thedailyexpress--2020-01-21--Keir Starmer: Why is Keir Starmer a Sir? Why was he knighted?

The election candidates were grilled at a hustings in Liverpool on Saturday , giving Labour party members an opportunity to ask the MPs questions .
Keir Starmer is already on the final ballot .
The new leader will be announced at a special conference on April 4 .
Sir Keir became a barrister in 1987 after studying law at the University of Leeds then doing a postgraduate course at the University of Oxford where he graduated with a Bachelor of Civil Law .
He later became the MP for Holborn and St Pancras in May 2015 and joined Jeremy Corbyn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Prior to his election , Sir Keir was knighted in 2014 for “ services to law and criminal justice ” .
In July 2008 , Sir Keir was named the new Head of the Crown Prosecution Service ( CPS ) and Director of Public Prosecutions ( DPP ) by the Attorney General .
The DPP is the head of the CPS so Sir Keir was responsible for the 7,000 staff and approximately 800,000 prosecutions undertaken by the department each year .
He held the role for five years between 2008 and 2013 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because of the work he did to abolish the death penalty in several Caribbean countries .
Sir Keir was knighted in part because of the work he did to abolish the death penalty in several Caribbean countries Although he accepted the knighthood the Holborn and St Pancras MP prefers not to be called Sir .
He said : “ I ’ ve never liked titles .
When I was DPP , everyone called me director and I said , ‘ Please don ’ t call me director , call me Keir Starmer.
’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now.
” He has worked on a number of high-profile cases in his career .
These include the successful retrial of the Stephen Lawrence case .
Sir Keir also worked on the case involving the death of Ian Tomlinson .
The newspaper vendor died after being struck by a police officer Simon Harwood at a G20 protest in London in 2009 .
Initially , Sir Keir announced there would not be a criminal investigation into the death .
However , after an inquest concluded Mr Tomlinson was unlawfully killed , Sir Keir brought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Harwood was found not guilty but dismissed by the Metropolitan Police for gross misconduct .
Another case involving Sir Keir was In February 2012 , when he announced that Energy Secretary Chris Huhne and his former wife , Vicky Pryce , would be prosecuted for perverting the course of justice .
Huhne was the first Cabinet Minister in British history to resign because of criminal proceedings .
Starmer had previously said in relation to the case that “ where there is sufficient evidence we do not shy away from prosecuting politicians ” .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Labour leadership alongside Rebecca Long-Bailey , Lisa Nandy , Jess Phillips and Emily Thornberry .
The candidates were at a hustings in Liverpool on Saturday where Labour Party members quizzed them on issues from anti-Semitism to Brexit .
All five acknowledged that Labour had suffered from division and in-fighting .
Between now and February 14 , the five candidates will seek to obtain the nominations from Constituency Labour Parties and affiliates ( including trade unions ) .
The candidates must get the backing of five percent of constituency parties or three affiliated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trade unions , to stand in the leadership election .
Sir Keir has already secured the support required to get him on the final ballot ; he has been backed by the Union of Shop , Distributive and Allied Workers ( Usdaw ) , Unison and affiliate group Sera .
The ballot opens on February 21 and will remain so until April 2 .
The Labour Party will then hold a special conference to announce the winner on April 4 .
The result of the deputy leadership election will also be announced on @ @ @

Keir Starmer labelled ‘boring’ by Andrew Pierce during GMB chat
Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer will face a barrage of uncomfortable and personal questions on Piers Morgan's Life Stories on ITV tonight. The series sees Piers interview a host of famous faces, often touching on taboo topics, uncomfortable truths and revelations.
Sir Keir Starmer, 58, will speak to Mr Morgan about his family life, the loss of his mother to a rare disease and his career before politics. One sad moment from the interview shows Sir Keir speaking to the former Good Morning Britain host about the devastating loss of his mother Josephine. Sir Keir revealed the moment his father rang him from the hospital to tell him his mum gravely ill. He said: "My dad was totally devoted to her and I remember being at home and he phoned and he said, 'your mum’s not going to make it, can you tell the others', and that hit me. READ MORE: Piers Morgan humiliated Keir Starmer in tense showdown: 'Grow a pair'
Keir Starmer: Why is Keir Starmer a Sir? Why was he knighted?
READ MORE 'He is boring!' Andrew Pierce slams Keir Starmer opening up in GMB dig Asked if he was able to say everything he wanted to say before his mother died, Sir Keir said "no", adding he would liked to have said to her: "I love you." His mother was a life-long Labour supporter and suffered from Still’s disease . She died in 2015 – just weeks before Sir Keir was elected MP for Holborn and St Pancras. The Labour leader also discusses his life before politics, including his career in law. But why exactly was Keir Starmer given a knighthood?
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Keir Starmer: Sir Keir Starmer will face a barrage of uncomfortable and personal questions on Piers Morgan's Life Stories tonight
Why is Keir Starmer a Sir? Sir Keir became a barrister in 1987 after studying law at the University of Leeds then doing a postgraduate course at the University of Oxford where he graduated with a Bachelor of Civil Law. He later became the MP for Holborn and St Pancras in May 2015 and joined Jeremy Corbyn’s shadow cabinet in October 2016. Before his election, Sir Keir was knighted in 2014 for “services to law and criminal justice”.
Trending
READ MORE ‘Antisemitism on rise again’ in Labour warns ex-MP In July 2008, Sir Keir was named the new Head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) by the Attorney General. The DPP is the head of the CPS so Sir Keir was responsible for the 7,000 staff and approximately 800,000 prosecutions undertaken by the department each year. He held the role for five years between 2008 and 2013. Sir Keir was knighted in part because of the work he did to abolish the death penalty in several Caribbean countries.
Keir Starmer: Sir Keir was knighted in part because of the work he did to abolish the death penalty in several Caribbean countries
Keir Starmer: Although he accepted the knighthood the Labour leader prefers not to be called Sir
Although he accepted the knighthood the Labour leader prefers not to be called Sir. He said: “I’ve never liked titles. When I was DPP, everyone called me director and I said, ‘Please don’t call me director, call me Keir Starmer.’ It’s a very similar battle now.” He has worked on a number of high-profile cases in his career, including the successful retrial of the Stephen Lawrence case. Sir Keir also worked on the case involving the death of Ian Tomlinson. The newspaper vendor died after being struck by a police officer Simon Harwood at a G20 protest in London in 2009.


thedailyexpress--2020-01-22--Brexit is happening! Boris' deal to pass FINAL hurdle today as MPs overturn Lords' defeats

The Withdrawal Agreement Bill - the legislation needed to make Brexit happen on January 31 - is set to be passed by MPs in the House of Commons .
They are expected to vote to remove changes made by peers as the draft law enters the “ ping pong ” process which will see it go back and forth between the Commons and the House of Lords until both houses can agree to what is in it .
The final parliamentary showdown comes after the Government suffered a fourth defeat in the Lords yesterday as peers backed a move to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The upper chamber voted by 300 to 220 , a majority of 80 , in favour of an amendment designed to protect the rights of unaccompanied refugee children to be reunited with family members living in the UK .
However , the Government is adamant it will not accept any of the changes to the WAB .
The Prime Minister 's official spokesman said the Government will seek to overturn all of the amendments imposed by the upper chamber .
He said : `` We 're disappointed the Lords have chosen to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Commons passed unamended with a majority of 99 .
`` Protecting vulnerable children will remain our priority after Brexit and the Withdrawal Agreement Bill reaffirms our commitment while clarifying the role of Parliament and government in negotiations .
`` We will seek to overturn this amendment as the Bill returns to the Commons . ''
If Mr Johnson insists that the changes made must be stripped out of the legislation then convention dictates the Lords will ultimately have to retreat because the wishes of the democratically-elected Commons must take precedence .
Removing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will not be difficult for the government given Mr Johnson has an 80-seat majority .
Once it has been approved by parliament it will swiftly move on to the Queen for her to approve it and keep the UK on course to leave the EU next week .
The amendment on child refugees was tabled by Labour peer Alf Dubs .
He had urged his fellow peers to support the move “ for the sake of the children stranded in Calais and Greece , who simply want to reach the safety of their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ urged MPs not to remove the provision from the bill .
“ I am enormously grateful to the Lords and of course to the public who have been so supportive of the moral argument for providing safe routes for children to be reunited with their families here , ” he said .
Brexit minister Lord Callanan , rejecting the amendments , said an important principle was involved that “ UK courts should be able to interpret UK law ” .
Lord Callanan assured peers the government would implement the policy in a sensible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He said the power could only be used before the end of the implementation period and there was no way a minister could 'interfere with a live case ' - allowing time to consult , consider and 'soberly extend the jurisdiction of UK courts to the historic case law of the ECJ ' .
“ It 's now the turn of the Commons to show what they 're made of .
”

Brexit: House of Lords vote to amend Johnson’s WAB
The Withdrawal Agreement Bill - the legislation needed to make Brexit happen on January 31 - is set to be passed by MPs in the House of Commons. They are expected to vote to remove changes made by peers as the draft law enters the “ping pong” process which will see it go back and forth between the Commons and the House of Lords until both houses can agree to what is in it. The final parliamentary showdown comes after the Government suffered a fourth defeat in the Lords yesterday as peers backed a move to protect help for refugee children after Brexit.
Trending
The upper chamber voted by 300 to 220, a majority of 80, in favour of an amendment designed to protect the rights of unaccompanied refugee children to be reunited with family members living in the UK. However, the Government is adamant it will not accept any of the changes to the WAB. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said the Government will seek to overturn all of the amendments imposed by the upper chamber. He said: "We're disappointed the Lords have chosen to amend the Withdrawal Agreement Bill that the Commons passed unamended with a majority of 99. "Protecting vulnerable children will remain our priority after Brexit and the Withdrawal Agreement Bill reaffirms our commitment while clarifying the role of Parliament and government in negotiations.
Boris' deal to pass final hurdle today
Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal is expected to pass today
"We will seek to overturn this amendment as the Bill returns to the Commons." If Mr Johnson insists that the changes made must be stripped out of the legislation then convention dictates the Lords will ultimately have to retreat because the wishes of the democratically-elected Commons must take precedence. Removing the amendments from the WAB in the Commons will not be difficult for the government given Mr Johnson has an 80-seat majority. Once it has been approved by parliament it will swiftly move on to the Queen for her to approve it and keep the UK on course to leave the EU next week. The amendment on child refugees was tabled by Labour peer Alf Dubs. He had urged his fellow peers to support the move “for the sake of the children stranded in Calais and Greece, who simply want to reach the safety of their families”.
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Labour peer Lord Alf Dubs


thedailyexpress--2020-01-21--Lisa Nandy leaves Long-Bailey and Starmer rattled with surprise backing for leadership

The Wigan MP , seen as an underdog in the Labour Party leadership contest to replace Jeremy Corbyn , is said to have impressed the trade union in a hustings event held this morning .
Sir Keir Starmer and Rebecca Long-Bailey , the front-runners in the contest , were snubbed by the important Labour affiliated body , who called Ms Nandy a `` breath of fresh air '' .
The GMB trade union is one of the largest in the UK with more than 600,000 members - and its backing is set have a big influence on the outcome in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , GMB General Secretary , said : `` Lisa Nandy is a breath of fresh air in the debate over Labour ’ s future .
`` The more members see of Lisa in this contest the more impressed they will be by her ambition , optimism and decisive leadership .
GMB is proud to nominate her . ''
“ Lisa won ’ t shy away from the tough challenges or bold decisions that lie ahead , because she knows that after fifteen years of losing elections , more of the same won ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entrenched in the union movement , Lisa gets the scale of the challenge .
“ She will raise Labour ’ s game with a bold agenda that puts people first and grounds politics in their lives . ''
Following her nomination , Ms Nandy said : `` To win again we 'll have to up our game , recover our ambition and inspire a movement .
`` I could not be more proud that the GMB - representing more than half a million workers - has given me their backing . ''
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deputy leader of the Labour Party .
Mr Roache continued : “ For the members I represent , Angela Rayner shows that politics is about them and rooted in real life .
READ MORE : Nicola Sturgeon : Gordon Brown argues there is 'no case ' for indy ref “ To those people who believe that politics is not for the likes of them or have been told their whole lives not to get ideas above their station , Angela Rayner is a role model and an inspiration .
One who walks the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would send for a former minimum wage care worker to go from looking after people as a home help to being Deputy Leader of the Labour Party – that ’ s what our party was founded on , it ’ s who we should be .
`` Angela is not just an inspiring activist and fearless organiser , she gets the scale of the challenge Labour faces and the need for a team effort that brings unity and takes the party forward to win again .
“ With Lisa and Angela at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Party can be relevant , bold , and truly grounded in their lives.
” The news of Ms Nandy 's nomination came just minutes after Jess Phillips quit the Labour leadership race .
DO N'T MISS Jess Phillips quits : Why has Labour leadership candidate quit ?
[ ANALYSIS ] Keir Starmer : Why is Keir Starmer a Sir ?
Why was he knighted ?
[ EXPLAINER ] Jon Ashworth squirms as BBC brutally make him re-watch prediction [ VIDEO ] The Birmingham Yardley MP admitted she was not the person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at this time '' .
In a video message - hours after pulling out of the latest hustings event hosted by the GMB - she said : `` The Labour Party will need to select a candidate who can unite all parts of our movement , the union movement , members and elected representatives .
`` And I have to also be honest with myself , as I said I always would be throughout this campaign .
At this time , that person is not me .
`` In order to win the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to find a candidate , in this race , who can do all of that , and then take that message out to the country .
`` A message of hope and change , that things can be better . ''
At the first hustings event in Liverpool on Saturday , Ms Phillips admitted her campaign has got off to an “ awful ” start and conceded she is unlikely to succeed Jeremy Corbyn as leader .
The backbench MP was also very critical of the event and described the format as “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ candidates were given just 40 seconds to answer a question .

Labour: Lisa Nandy endorsement explained by GMB Union boss
The Wigan MP, seen as an underdog in the Labour Party leadership contest to replace Jeremy Corbyn, is said to have impressed the trade union in a hustings event held this morning. Sir Keir Starmer and Rebecca Long-Bailey, the front-runners in the contest, were snubbed by the important Labour affiliated body, who called Ms Nandy a "breath of fresh air". The GMB trade union is one of the largest in the UK with more than 600,000 members - and its backing is set have a big influence on the outcome in the Labour leadership contest.
Lisa won’t shy away from the tough challenges or bold decisions that lie ahead, because she knows that after fifteen years of losing elections, more of the same won’t cut it Tim Roache
Tim Roache, GMB General Secretary, said: "Lisa Nandy is a breath of fresh air in the debate over Labour’s future. "The more members see of Lisa in this contest the more impressed they will be by her ambition, optimism and decisive leadership. GMB is proud to nominate her." “Lisa won’t shy away from the tough challenges or bold decisions that lie ahead, because she knows that after fifteen years of losing elections, more of the same won’t cut it. “A candidate entrenched in the union movement, Lisa gets the scale of the challenge. “She will raise Labour’s game with a bold agenda that puts people first and grounds politics in their lives."
Lisa Nandy has won the surprise backing of GMB in the Labour leadership race
Tim Roache described Lisa Nandy as a 'breath of fresh air in the debate over Labour’s future'
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Following her nomination, Ms Nandy said: "To win again we'll have to up our game, recover our ambition and inspire a movement. "I could not be more proud that the GMB - representing more than half a million workers - has given me their backing." The GMB has also nominated Angela Rayner for deputy leader of the Labour Party. Mr Roache continued: “For the members I represent, Angela Rayner shows that politics is about them and rooted in real life. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Gordon Brown argues there is 'no case' for indy ref
Lisa Nandy tweeted 'she could not be more proud' the GMB had given her their backing
Angela Rayner has received the backing of the GMB trade union for the deputy Labour leader position
Sir Keir Starmer has been backed by the Usdaw shopworkers' union
The Birmingham Yardley MP admitted she was not the person to "unite" the party "at this time". In a video message - hours after pulling out of the latest hustings event hosted by the GMB - she said: "The Labour Party will need to select a candidate who can unite all parts of our movement, the union movement, members and elected representatives. "And I have to also be honest with myself, as I said I always would be throughout this campaign. At this time, that person is not me. "In order to win the country, we are going to have to find a candidate, in this race, who can do all of that, and then take that message out to the country.
Rebecca Long-Bailey has also secured the nomination of a trade union
"A message of hope and change, that things can be better." At the first hustings event in Liverpool on Saturday, Ms Phillips admitted her campaign has got off to an “awful” start and conceded she is unlikely to succeed Jeremy Corbyn as leader. The backbench MP was also very critical of the event and described the format as “ridiculous” as each of the five candidates were given just 40 seconds to answer a question. She admitted her responses “fell flat”.
What the policies of each Labour candidate would be like if they win the leadership race
Ms Phillips, who has been an outspoken critic of Mr Corbyn, also admitted she “probably won’t win” the contest. The Labour leadership candidates are now battling to make it to the final round having initially being required to secure the support of Labour MPs and MEPs. They can do this via one of two routes - get the nominations of three Labour affiliates, including at least two trade unions, or secure endorsements from at least five percent of constituency Labour parties (CLPs). The candidates have until February 14 to secure their place on this ballot, before the new Labour leader is named on April 4.
Lisa Nandy withdrew from the race to become the next Labour leader
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-01-21--Boris Johnson defeated AGAIN: Lords sabotage Bill as they continue anti-Brexit crusade

Peers backed an amendment to ensure the rights of unaccompanied child refugees to be reunited with their families in the UK after Brexit .
The Lords voted by 300 to 220 , a majority of 80 , to support the bid by Labour 's Lord Dubs .
It follows three defeats for the Prime Minister on Monday night as the European Union ( Withdrawal Agreement ) Bill was debated in the Lords .
The legislation is set to return to the Commons tomorrow , where Mr Johnson is expected to use his 80-strong majority to overturn the amendments .
Lord @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a child on the Kindertransport , urged ministers not to use the youngsters as `` bargaining chips '' in negotiations .
He accused the Government of dropping earlier protections for child refugees in a previous version of the Brexit legislation .
Lords Dubs called on the Government not to `` close the door '' on the children affected .
By providing them with a safe , legal route to the UK , peers would be `` thwarting the traffickers '' and avoiding the need for youngsters to take more dangerous options to get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DUH !
We got it wrong !
IMF FINALLY admits Brexit Britain will boom The Bishop of Durham , the Rt Rev Paul Butler , said the law as it stood was `` hard fought for , not easily won '' and warned ministers against sending a negative message .
He said the issue acted as a `` moral bellwether for the future of our country '' , adding : `` We want to be known as a country that is welcoming and passionate and committed to playing our full part in responding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the reality of refugees around the world . ''
Liberal Democrat Baroness Hamwee said : `` There is a strong feeling that Parliament should not reduce our commitment to these children or to safe and legal routes . ''
DO N'T MISS ‘ Travesty of democracy ’ Brexiteers vent fury at House of Lords [ INSIGHT ] ‘ So much for Brexit disaster !
’ UK economy set to trounce eurozone [ VIDEO ] Brexit LIVE : Boris Johnson ’ s team FURIOUS at fourth Lords defeat [ LIVE BLOG ] The Prime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seek to overturn the amendments by the Lords .
Mr Johnson ’ s first defeat was over the right of EU citizens lawfully residing in the UK after Brexit .
Peers backed a cross-party amendment to the legislation by 270 to 229 , majority 41 , allowing them to be given physical proof of their status .

Brexit: House of Lords vote to amend Johnson’s WAB
Peers backed an amendment to ensure the rights of unaccompanied child refugees to be reunited with their families in the UK after Brexit. The Lords voted by 300 to 220, a majority of 80, to support the bid by Labour's Lord Dubs.
It follows three defeats for the Prime Minister on Monday night as the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill was debated in the Lords. The legislation is set to return to the Commons tomorrow, where Mr Johnson is expected to use his 80-strong majority to overturn the amendments. Lord Dubs, who fled the Nazis as a child on the Kindertransport, urged ministers not to use the youngsters as "bargaining chips" in negotiations.
Boris Johnson has been handed a fourth defeat in the Lords in just 24 hours over his Brexit deal
He accused the Government of dropping earlier protections for child refugees in a previous version of the Brexit legislation. Lords Dubs called on the Government not to "close the door" on the children affected. By providing them with a safe, legal route to the UK, peers would be "thwarting the traffickers" and avoiding the need for youngsters to take more dangerous options to get to their families. READ MORE: DUH! We got it wrong! IMF FINALLY admits Brexit Britain will boom
Peers backed a move to ensure the rights of child refugees to be reunited with their families in the UK post-Brexit
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
The Bishop of Durham, the Rt Rev Paul Butler, said the law as it stood was "hard fought for, not easily won" and warned ministers against sending a negative message. He said the issue acted as a "moral bellwether for the future of our country", adding: "We want to be known as a country that is welcoming and passionate and committed to playing our full part in responding to the deep issues that arise from the reality of refugees around the world." Liberal Democrat Baroness Hamwee said: "There is a strong feeling that Parliament should not reduce our commitment to these children or to safe and legal routes." DON'T MISS
‘Travesty of democracy’ Brexiteers vent fury at House of Lords [INSIGHT]
‘So much for Brexit disaster!’ UK economy set to trounce eurozone [VIDEO]
Brexit LIVE: Boris Johnson’s team FURIOUS at fourth Lords defeat [LIVE BLOG]
Lord Dubs urged ministers not to use the children as "bargaining chips" in negotiations
The Prime Minister's spokesman said the Government will seek to overturn the amendments by the Lords
The Prime Minister's spokesman said the Government will seek to overturn the amendments by the Lords. Mr Johnson’s first defeat was over the right of EU citizens lawfully residing in the UK after Brexit. Peers backed a cross-party amendment to the legislation by 270 to 229, majority 41, allowing them to be given physical proof of their status.
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-01-21--BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg silences Nicola Sturgeon’s Scottish independence call with warning

In an opinion piece , the BBC ’ s political editor said : “ The SNP again swept the board in Scotland and is arguing forcefully for another referendum , but there is a new prime minister who is promising to reset the lopsided UK .
There is not a chance that Boris Johnson will grant the SNP that second vote.
” She illuminated the current predicament that faces the Government when dealing with Nicola Sturgeon ’ s requests for a second referendum as , “ senior figures are aware they can ’ t just stick with a position of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ again ” .
The BBC anchor referred to Gordon Brown when she asked the question of whether Prime Minister Boris Johnson will “ come forward anytime soon with anything that might satisfy the former occupant of the job ?
” She is referring to the ex-Labour leader Gordon Brown ’ s suggestions , “ that if Westminster ’ s tribes don ’ t take the notion of giving power away seriously , they might find that before too long , the people who give them their votes may make decisions they don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Prime Minister Mr Brown has spoken that , “ unless the UK changes from top to bottom and recognises the importance of the regions and the nations and giving respect to the regions , then I think the United Kingdom could end ” .
Mr Brown warned the Conservatives election win was not “ a signal that the country is at ease ” .
Mrs Kuenssberg explained how a Government source suggested there is “ no point trying to go to war ” with the SNP in Holyrood , but better to try @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two sides to work together more fruitfully .
She said : “ Another Tory insider suggested the important thing is to make it feel as if Scotland is being taken into consideration properly by No 10 , with a much more proactive attitude ” .
The statement from Mrs Kuenssberg has come amid claims by polling guru John Curtice that the SNP has no mandate for a second Scottish independence referendum .
Mr Curtice dismissed Nicola Sturgeon ’ s view that there is a mandate from the Scottish people for a second referendum @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in fiery FMQs clash over Scottish education The polling expert said Mrs Sturgeon ’ s request was a “ highly dubious exercise ” .
Professor Curtice , who teaches at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow , said the election result was an inadequate way of judging support for a second poll .
Instead , the professor said , two polls done during the election campaign were a better way of quantifying public feeling towards the policy .
In a blog on his website What Scotland Thinks , Professor Curtice said using the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does not take into account the effect of the first past the post system , and how it calculates seats from votes .
Nicola Sturgeon nightmare : SNP set for disaster and collapse in 2020 [ INSIGHT ] SNP accused of plot to ‘ make up ’ economic figures to boost indyref [ INSIGHT ] Ruth Davidson explains why SNP have NO mandate for Indyref2 [ VIDEO ] Neither , the blog said , should the SNP claim a mandate based on the share of the vote at the December election because voters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stance on the referendum , but still voted for them regardless .
The SNP won 47 seats in the December vote , an increase of 12 from their previous tally , leading to senior figures in the party claiming it is time for a second independence referendum .
A week later , the First Minister formally asked for the powers to hold a referendum from the Prime Minister , something he rejected this week .
However , Professor Curtice claims in his blog that two polls conducted during the election campaign present a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than the general election .

Sturgeon has 'no case' for a second referendum says Brown
In an opinion piece, the BBC’s political editor said: “The SNP again swept the board in Scotland and is arguing forcefully for another referendum, but there is a new prime minister who is promising to reset the lopsided UK. There is not a chance that Boris Johnson will grant the SNP that second vote.” She illuminated the current predicament that faces the Government when dealing with Nicola Sturgeon’s requests for a second referendum as, “senior figures are aware they can’t just stick with a position of saying no to a referendum again and again”.
The BBC anchor referred to Gordon Brown when she asked the question of whether Prime Minister Boris Johnson will “come forward anytime soon with anything that might satisfy the former occupant of the job?” She is referring to the ex-Labour leader Gordon Brown’s suggestions, “that if Westminster’s tribes don’t take the notion of giving power away seriously, they might find that before too long, the people who give them their votes may make decisions they don’t like very much”. Former Prime Minister Mr Brown has spoken that, “unless the UK changes from top to bottom and recognises the importance of the regions and the nations and giving respect to the regions, then I think the United Kingdom could end”. Mr Brown warned the Conservatives election win was not “a signal that the country is at ease”.
Laura Kuenssberg has commented on the Scottish referendum
Mrs Kuenssberg explained how a Government source suggested there is “no point trying to go to war” with the SNP in Holyrood, but better to try to find practical ways of getting the two sides to work together more fruitfully. She said: “Another Tory insider suggested the important thing is to make it feel as if Scotland is being taken into consideration properly by No 10, with a much more proactive attitude”. The statement from Mrs Kuenssberg has come amid claims by polling guru John Curtice that the SNP has no mandate for a second Scottish independence referendum. Mr Curtice dismissed Nicola Sturgeon’s view that there is a mandate from the Scottish people for a second referendum. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon savaged in fiery FMQs clash over Scottish education
Nicola Sturgeon wants the Government to accept her independence request
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
The polling expert said Mrs Sturgeon’s request was a “highly dubious exercise”. Professor Curtice, who teaches at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow, said the election result was an inadequate way of judging support for a second poll. Instead, the professor said, two polls done during the election campaign were a better way of quantifying public feeling towards the policy. In a blog on his website What Scotland Thinks, Professor Curtice said using the number of seats to claim a mandate does not take into account the effect of the first past the post system, and how it calculates seats from votes. DON'T MISS Nicola Sturgeon nightmare: SNP set for disaster and collapse in 2020 [INSIGHT]
SNP accused of plot to ‘make up’ economic figures to boost indyref [INSIGHT]
Ruth Davidson explains why SNP have NO mandate for Indyref2 [VIDEO]
Nicola Sturgeon wants the Government to accept her independence request
Neither, the blog said, should the SNP claim a mandate based on the share of the vote at the December election because voters may not have agreed with the SNP stance on the referendum, but still voted for them regardless. The SNP won 47 seats in the December vote, an increase of 12 from their previous tally, leading to senior figures in the party claiming it is time for a second independence referendum. A week later, the First Minister formally asked for the powers to hold a referendum from the Prime Minister, something he rejected this week. However, Professor Curtice claims in his blog that two polls conducted during the election campaign present a better picture of attitudes towards another referendum than the general election.
Nicola Sturgeon wants the Government to accept her independence request
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-01-21--‘Travesty of democracy!’ Britons furious over House of Lords bid to change Brexit

And their calls have been backed by Brexiteer MP Daniel Kawczynski , who said the Lords needed to replaced by a legislature of elected senators - much like the United States - as well as pointing the finger at former Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg .
Despite last month ’ s emphatic general election victory , and the Withdrawal Agreement Bill ’ s safe passage through the House of Commons , Mr Johnson is still racing against the clock to deliver Brexit by January 31 , and suffered three defeats in the Lords last night - with more losses anticipated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ further amendments .
The Lords backed a Liberal Democrat amendment offering eligible EU citizens in Britain an automatic right to stay after Brexit , rather than having to apply to the government to do so , by 270 to 229 .
After that they voted by 241 to 205 , to delete powers which would allow lower courts to overturn rulings of the European Court of Justice .
Almost immediately after that , the House approved an amendment which permitting cases to be referred to the Supreme Court to adjudicate on whether to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Express.co.uk ’ s Facebook page , Tony Reid said : “ The House of Lords trying to justify how important they are .
“ An absolute waste of time and finance keeping this shower in work .
“ They need to be disbanded , a complete shambles.
” Tony Gurney said : “ Just proves that the Lords needs to be changed or abolished .
It ’ s a joke and a travesty of democracy .
JUST IN : DUH !
We got it wrong !
IMF FINALLY admits Brexit Britain will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peers are NOT elected , our MPs were , to carry out our wishes .
Abolish the house of lords immediately !
” David Hulmes was also angry , saying : “ Despite what they say , the unelected elite are still up to their dirty tricks to try and frustrate the will of the people .
Pond life !
Terry Wallace claimed : “ Here we go again remainers at it again in house of lords we should close this establishment down.
” DO N'T MISS : BBC bias : How John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ INSIGHT ] Ruth Davidson explains why SNP have NO mandate for Indyref2 [ REVEALED ] John Bercow claimed £367 for car to Luton – to give speech on expenses [ ANALYSIS ] Meanwhile Stephen Dibben took the opportunity to make a point about controversial House of Commons Speaker John Bercow .
He said : “ That ’ s why we don ’ t want Bercow in the Lords .
He will block everything.
” Not everybody was quite so emphatic though - Colin J Moon said : “ The Lords can ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anyway without reading up on this , isn ’ t this a good idea as it would stop EU citizens not already here coming here after Brexit and saying that they were here already and so can work ?
” Shrewsbury and Atcham MP Mr Kawczynski , who previously hit the headlines after meeting with barristers to discuss a possible legal challenge to the Benn Act which sought to prevent a no-deal Brexit , said : “ We have a system whereby Nick Clegg could stuff the Lords with countless new Lib Dem @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Cameron government .
“ Despite the Lib Dem being totally rejected by electorate , Clegg ’ s legacy lives on making the Lords unrepresentative .
“ The sooner we have an elected Senate of 100 Senators the better , reducing the costs associated with it and making this chamber representative of the Electorate .
”

Brexit: Lords vote to amend Withdrawal Agreement Bill
And their calls have been backed by Brexiteer MP Daniel Kawczynski, who said the Lords needed to replaced by a legislature of elected senators - much like the United States - as well as pointing the finger at former Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg. Despite last month’s emphatic general election victory, and the Withdrawal Agreement Bill’s safe passage through the House of Commons, Mr Johnson is still racing against the clock to deliver Brexit by January 31, and suffered three defeats in the Lords last night - with more losses yesterday as peers seek to tack on further amendments. The Lords backed a Liberal Democrat amendment offering eligible EU citizens in Britain an automatic right to stay after Brexit, rather than having to apply to the government to do so, by 270 to 229.
After that they voted by 241 to 205, to delete powers which would allow lower courts to overturn rulings of the European Court of Justice. Almost immediately after that, the House approved an amendment which permitting cases to be referred to the Supreme Court to adjudicate on whether to depart from EU case law. Posting on Express.co.uk’s Facebook page, Tony Reid said: “The House of Lords trying to justify how important they are.
Boris Johnson suffered three defeats in the Lords yesterday
The State opening of Parliament
It’s a joke and a travesty of democracy Tony Gurney
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
“An absolute waste of time and finance keeping this shower in work. “They need to be disbanded, a complete shambles.” Tony Gurney said: “Just proves that the Lords needs to be changed or abolished. It’s a joke and a travesty of democracy. JUST IN: DUH! We got it wrong! IMF FINALLY admits Brexit Britain will boom
Former Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg
Daniel Kawczynski MP
Meanwhile Stephen Dibben took the opportunity to make a point about controversial House of Commons Speaker John Bercow. He said: “That’s why we don’t want Bercow in the Lords. He will block everything.” Not everybody was quite so emphatic though - Colin J Moon said: “The Lords can’t defeat, just delay, but anyway without reading up on this, isn’t this a good idea as it would stop EU citizens not already here coming here after Brexit and saying that they were here already and so can work?”
The passage of a Bill through Parliament
Shrewsbury and Atcham MP Mr Kawczynski, who previously hit the headlines after meeting with barristers to discuss a possible legal challenge to the Benn Act which sought to prevent a no-deal Brexit, said: “We have a system whereby Nick Clegg could stuff the Lords with countless new Lib Dem Peers in exchange for agreeing to support a Cameron government. “Despite the Lib Dem being totally rejected by electorate, Clegg’s legacy lives on making the Lords unrepresentative. “The sooner we have an elected Senate of 100 Senators the better, reducing the costs associated with it and making this chamber representative of the Electorate.”
John Bercow has been tipped for a seat in the House of Lords
Jeremy Vine: House of Lords should be ‘closed down’ says caller
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-01-21--Boris Johnson overwhelmingly told to remove House of Lords NOW in poll

Boris Johnson ’ s Brexit Bill faced more turmoil last night after the Prime Minister suffered three defeats in the House of Lords .
Peers voted in favour of five amendments to the Withdrawal Agreement .
The Prime Minister was urged to remove the House of Lords by more than 18,000 people taking part in the Express.co.uk poll .
The survey , asking “ Should Boris Johnson act now to remove the House of Lords ?
” , was carried out between 2.30pm to 8pm on Janaury 21 .
It saw a total of 19,139 people participate in the voting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 95 percent believed Mr Johnson should act now .
One voter claimed the House of Lords was “ no longer fit for purpose and needs to be scrapped completely forthwith ” .
Another added : “ The House of Lords has to have a purpose other than a place of partisan disruption , serving political negativity.
” A poll user commented : “ My understanding was that the purpose of the House of Lords was to act as a relatively independent advisor on proposed legislation , not to change or reverse government decisions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the House of Lords with new peers , whether deserved or not , the House of Lords has turned into a place that is basically unfit for purpose.
” One voter added : “ We need some form of scrutiny , checks and balances , but the system as is isn ’ t working for us , and the way the Lords are appointed is all wrong.
” JUST IN : Brexit Day party to attract 'overwhelming ' crowd say organisers A poll voter commented : “ Let the country have a people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get rid of them.
” Another also called for “ referendum to get rid of the Lords ” .
One voter said : “ Should the House of Lords be abolished ?
Probably , but not until its constitutional role has been examined and an alternative has been developed.
” A further added : “ A second legislative chamber is required and whilst the current chamber requires significant reform we should be careful as to how and when this is done .
“ This is a constitutional matter and should not be rushed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I think this would bit of an over-reaction .

Brexit: House of Lords vote to amend Johnson’s WAB
Boris Johnson’s Brexit Bill faced more turmoil last night after the Prime Minister suffered three defeats in the House of Lords. Peers voted in favour of five amendments to the Withdrawal Agreement. The Prime Minister was urged to remove the House of Lords by more than 18,000 people taking part in the Express.co.uk poll.
The survey, asking “Should Boris Johnson act now to remove the House of Lords?”, was carried out between 2.30pm to 8pm on Janaury 21. It saw a total of 19,139 people participate in the voting. Of the people taking part, 95 percent believed Mr Johnson should act now. One voter claimed the House of Lords was “no longer fit for purpose and needs to be scrapped completely forthwith”.
An Express.co.uk poll urged Boris Johnson to abolish the House of Lords
Over 18,000 (95 percent) voted yes
Another added: “The House of Lords has to have a purpose other than a place of partisan disruption, serving political negativity.” A poll user commented: “My understanding was that the purpose of the House of Lords was to act as a relatively independent advisor on proposed legislation, not to change or reverse government decisions. “Since successive governments have packed the House of Lords with new peers, whether deserved or not, the House of Lords has turned into a place that is basically unfit for purpose.” One voter added: “We need some form of scrutiny, checks and balances, but the system as is isn’t working for us, and the way the Lords are appointed is all wrong.” JUST IN: Brexit Day party to attract 'overwhelming' crowd say organisers
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
The House of Lords voted to amend the Withdrawal Bill
Boris suffered three defeats in the House of Lords
Many voters called for a referendum on the House of Lords
A poll voter commented: “Let the country have a people’s vote to decide wether to get rid of them.” Another also called for “referendum to get rid of the Lords”. One voter said: “Should the House of Lords be abolished? Probably, but not until its constitutional role has been examined and an alternative has been developed.”
Brexit timeline
A further added: “A second legislative chamber is required and whilst the current chamber requires significant reform we should be careful as to how and when this is done. “This is a constitutional matter and should not be rushed into.” Another voter claimed: “I think this would bit of an over-reaction.
Voters felt the House of Lords was trying to hinder Boris Johnson's Brexit Bill
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-01-21--Brexit deal at risk: Boris Johnson issued major threat from Trump official ahead of talks

Steve Mnuchin , the US Treasury Secretary , delivered a potential sledgehammer blow to US-UK trade discussions when he warned of the large costs Britain could incur if it chose to pursue a so-called ‘ digital tax ’ .
Mr Mnuchin ’ s statement follows a complex and politically fraught discussion between the US and France .
French President Emmanuel Macron was forced by his US counterpart to delay the imposition of taxes on American digital giants such as Amazon , Facebook and Google .
France had announced its plans to impose a digital tax last year , to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Mr Macron ’ s hand was ultimately forced , however , by Mr Trump ’ s vow to slap huge tariffs of up to 100 percent on over £1.8billion ( $ 2.4billion ) worth of French imports .
Products included French staples such as champagne , designer handbags and Roquefort cheese .
In response to Mr Macron turning down the heat on plans , Mr Trump promised to hold fire on his revenge tariffs .
The agreement between Mr Trump and Mr Macron seems to place a pause on a trade war @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the relationship between the US and China .
However , Mr Mnuchin , instrumental to US-China discussions , warned that the UK and Italy could face similar tariffs if they refuse to co-operate with Mr Trump ’ s government .
Boris Johnson ’ s manifesto promised to introduce a digital services tax to the UK .
READ MORE : ‘ Come to your senses !
’ Furious France lashes out at Trump over trade A plan first divided by then-Chancellor Philip Hammond would hit digital organisations with global sales of £500m and more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sales .
These companies would be forced to pay a tax of two percent on those UK sales .
Italy , which Mr Mnuchin mentioned could be at risk , had proposed a three percent digital services tax , alongside Austria who also put forward the idea of a tax .
DO N'T MISS : Macron ally sends Boris huge warning as no deal looms [ REVEALED ] Macron outlines demands for international tax system at G7 [ INSIGHT ] Macron crisis : French president approval ratings catastrophically low [ SHOCK ] But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mnuchin warned countries to suspend their plans .
Speaking to the Wall Street Journal , he said : “ If not , they ’ ll find themselves faced with President Trump ’ s tariffs .
We ’ ll be having similar conversations with them.
” Britain ’ s tax was set to be introduced in April , at the start of the new tax year .
It is expected to raise up to £500million per year .
A similar warning was issued last month by Robert Lighthizer , Mr Trump ’ s trade @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could be a very tangible reality for those who imposed taxes on US digital companies .
The discussions could , however , prove particularly difficult for Brexit trade negotiations .
Mr Johnson has frequently spoken of the “ special relationship ” between Britain and the US .

Donald Trump slams 'prophets of doom' in keynote speech
Steve Mnuchin, the US Treasury Secretary, delivered a potential sledgehammer blow to US-UK trade discussions when he warned of the large costs Britain could incur if it chose to pursue a so-called ‘digital tax’. Mr Mnuchin’s statement follows a complex and politically fraught discussion between the US and France. French President Emmanuel Macron was forced by his US counterpart to delay the imposition of taxes on American digital giants such as Amazon, Facebook and Google.
France had announced its plans to impose a digital tax last year, to the dismay and annoyance of the American government. Mr Macron’s hand was ultimately forced, however, by Mr Trump’s vow to slap huge tariffs of up to 100 percent on over £1.8billion ($2.4billion) worth of French imports. Products included French staples such as champagne, designer handbags and Roquefort cheese.
Donald Trump has threatened to slap huge taxes on anyone who backs a digital services tax
Mr Trump and Mr Macron got into a row over a digital services tax
In response to Mr Macron turning down the heat on plans, Mr Trump promised to hold fire on his revenge tariffs. The agreement between Mr Trump and Mr Macron seems to place a pause on a trade war between the US and France, unlike the relationship between the US and China. However, Mr Mnuchin, instrumental to US-China discussions, warned that the UK and Italy could face similar tariffs if they refuse to co-operate with Mr Trump’s government. Boris Johnson’s manifesto promised to introduce a digital services tax to the UK. READ MORE: ‘Come to your senses!’ Furious France lashes out at Trump over trade
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
France and Britain could be slapped with huge retaliatory tariffs by the US
A plan first divided by then-Chancellor Philip Hammond would hit digital organisations with global sales of £500m and more, with at least £25m of UK sales. These companies would be forced to pay a tax of two percent on those UK sales. Italy, which Mr Mnuchin mentioned could be at risk, had proposed a three percent digital services tax, alongside Austria who also put forward the idea of a tax. DON'T MISS:
Macron ally sends Boris huge warning as no deal looms [REVEALED]
Macron outlines demands for international tax system at G7 [INSIGHT]
Macron crisis: French president approval ratings catastrophically low [SHOCK]
Steven Mnuchin warned that any digital services tax was 'unfair'
Mr Mnuchin said similar conversations to France could be had with the UK, Italy and Austria
But describing the tax as unfair, Mr Mnuchin warned countries to suspend their plans. Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, he said: “If not, they’ll find themselves faced with President Trump’s tariffs. We’ll be having similar conversations with them.” Britain’s tax was set to be introduced in April, at the start of the new tax year. It is expected to raise up to £500million per year.
The US and China have a complicated tariff arrangement
A similar warning was issued last month by Robert Lighthizer, Mr Trump’s trade representative. He warned that retaliatory tariffs could be a very tangible reality for those who imposed taxes on US digital companies. The discussions could, however, prove particularly difficult for Brexit trade negotiations. Mr Johnson has frequently spoken of the “special relationship” between Britain and the US.
Mr Johnson hopes to build a trade relationship with the US after Brexit
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-01-21--Brexit BLOCKED: Will Brexit ever happen? Has the new deal been approved?

The Withdrawal Agreement is nearing the final stages of approval , after passing through the House of Commons .
Now @ @ @ @ @ had its say , and Boris Johnson faces a setback after peers voted for several @ @ @ @ @ The Lords backed five amendments in total to the European Union ( Withdrawal Agreement ) @ @ @ @ @ scrutiny .
The first three amendments came on Monday and were on the rights of @ @ @ @ @ the UK and the power of courts to depart from European Court of Justice rulings @ @ @ @ @ workers should be given physical proof of their right to remain .
On Tuesday , @ @ @ @ @ to ensure the rights of unaccompanied child refugees to be reunited with their families in @ @ @ @ @ More : Brexit deal WILL be done in 2020 - EU drops threat to take @

Brexit: Lords vote in favour of Withdrawal Bill amendment 19
The Withdrawal Agreement is nearing the final stages of approval, after passing through the House of Commons. Now the House of Lords has had its say, and Boris Johnson faces a setback after peers voted for several amendments to the Bill.
The Lords backed five amendments in total to the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill across two days of scrutiny. The first three amendments came on Monday and were on the rights of EU workers legally residing in the UK and the power of courts to depart from European Court of Justice rulings. One amendment said EU workers should be given physical proof of their right to remain. On Tuesday, peers voted for a move to ensure the rights of unaccompanied child refugees to be reunited with their families in the UK post-Brexit. Read More: Brexit deal WILL be done in 2020 - EU drops threat to take years
Brexit BLOCKED: The House of Lords have voted for five amendments to Mr Johnson's deal
Brexit BLOCKED: The House of Lords amendments will now be discussed by the Commons
READ MORE Boris Johnson defeated AGAIN: Lords sabotage Bill for 4th time Labour’s Lord Dubs led the bid to restore the right of unaccompanied child refugees in the EU to be reunited with their families in the UK after Brexit. Lord Dubs suggested his amendment would help alter the view of the Tories being the “mean and nasty” party. The latest reversal saw peers narrowly back a move underlining the commitment to the so-called Sewel Convention. The Sewel Convention asserts UK Parliament “will not normally” legislate for devolved matters without the consent of the devolved legislature affected.
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Brexit BLOCKED: One amendment was Lord Dubs' bid to restore the right of unaccompanied child refugees in the EU
READ MORE Boris told he must pass fisheries 'litmus test' to secure true Brexit However, it will then be up to peers to decide whether to continue the parliamentary tennis match or bow to the will of the elected House, which seems the most likely. Labour, Liberal Democrat and independent cross-bench peers ignored repeated ministerial warnings not to amend the Bill, insisting their objection was not to stop Brexit but to ensure the legislation was better drafted. The Prime Minister’s official spokesman told reporters: “We are disappointed that the Lords has chosen to amend the Withdrawal Agreement Bill after the Commons passed it unamended. “We will seek to overturn this amendment as the Bill returns to the Commons.”
Brexit BLOCKED: After the Commons, it will be up to the House of Lords whether to continue scrutinising the Bill or bow to Mr Johnson
Brexit BLOCKED: Mr Johnson is hoping to overturn the amendments with his 80-strong majority
The role of the House of Lords is primarily to scrutinise the work of the Government and pass bills into UK law. The exit date for the UK to leave the European Union is just days away, falling on January 31. There are plans in place to mark the historic occasion, with a clock counting down to 11pm will be projected onto Downing Street on January 31. Downing Street has also confirmed next week’s cabinet meeting will take place in the north of England to mark Britain’s exit from the bloc.
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-01-21--Nicola Sturgeon to pile pressure on Boris Johnson by revealing independence plans IN DAYS

A spokesman for Scotland ’ s First Minister and the SNP leader confirmed she will set out her Government ’ s plans next week .
He said : “ The First Minister will seek to update before the end of the month , as she indicated.
” Nicola Sturgeon ’ s spokesman insisted ministers are still committed to holding a referendum this year , despite the latest refusal from Boris Johnson last week .
He said the SNP ’ s position was “ endorsed ” by voters in last month ’ s general election , when Scotland ’ s ruling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ available in the country .
The spokesman added : ” It will be an update following the Prime Minister ’ s reply to the First Minister , which was delivered this time last week .
“ It will be an update from our side on how we intend to move things forward in light of that reply.
” Ms Sturgeon is continuing her campaign for a second referendum on Scottish independence - more than five years after the country voted 55 percent to 45 percent in favour of remaining in the UK .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the SNP ’ s gains at last month ’ s general election mean it now has a mandate to hold Indyref2 this year .
But last week Mr Johnson wrote to Ms Sturgeon , highlighting how the SNP had promised the referendum had been a “ once-in-a-generation event ” .
In the letter , the Prime Minister said the UK Government “ will continue to uphold the democratic decision of the Scottish people and the promise that you made to them ” .
He added “ for that reason , I can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of power that would lead to further independence referendums ” .
READ MORE : SNP MP brutally shut down by Andrea Leadsom against Brexit pessimism This sparked a furious response from Ms Sturgeon , who raged : “ The problem for the Tories is the longer they try to block democracy , the more they show the Westminster union is not one of equals and fuel support for independence .
“ This response is predictable - but also unsustainable and self defeating .
Scotland will have the right to choose.
” She said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ response and the next steps it will take before the end of January - adding she would also ask MSPs at Holyrood to “ back Scotland ’ s right to choose our own future ” .
Ms Sturgeon has requested powers to be transferred , insisting there was a “ democratic case ” for a second ballot to be held on the issue .
DO N'T MISS Sturgeon stunned as SNP claim for independence mandate is dismantled [ VIDEO ] Nicola Sturgeon nightmare : SNP set for disaster and collapse in 2020 [ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ support within her party ' [ INSIGHT ] Last week , a senior SNP politician called on the Scottish Parliament to bypass the Prime Minister and Westminster by calling its own second Scottish independence referendum .
Former Health Secretary Alex Neil told the Daily Record bypassing Westminster would be a legal move if the Lord Advocate gave it the go-ahead .
When asked what the response from ministers should be if they were told Holyrood could stage their own referendum , he beamed : “ Do it !
” The comments from Mr @ @ @ @ @ @ @ push from the party on Indyref2 , with Constitutional Relations Secretary Mike Russell claiming there are “ many options ” available to them .

Sturgeon has 'no case' for a second referendum says Brown
A spokesman for Scotland’s First Minister and the SNP leader confirmed she will set out her Government’s plans next week. He said: “The First Minister will seek to update before the end of the month, as she indicated.” Nicola Sturgeon’s spokesman insisted ministers are still committed to holding a referendum this year, despite the latest refusal from Boris Johnson last week.
He said the SNP’s position was “endorsed” by voters in last month’s general election, when Scotland’s ruling party won 47 of the 59 seats available in the country. The spokesman added: ”It will be an update following the Prime Minister’s reply to the First Minister, which was delivered this time last week. “It will be an update from our side on how we intend to move things forward in light of that reply.” Ms Sturgeon is continuing her campaign for a second referendum on Scottish independence - more than five years after the country voted 55 percent to 45 percent in favour of remaining in the UK.
Nicola Sturgeon will look to fight back against Boris Johnson's refusal for a second referendum
Scotland's First Minister will step up her plans for a second referendum on independence next week
Scotland’s First Minister has argued the SNP’s gains at last month’s general election mean it now has a mandate to hold Indyref2 this year. But last week Mr Johnson wrote to Ms Sturgeon, highlighting how the SNP had promised the referendum had been a “once-in-a-generation event”. In the letter, the Prime Minister said the UK Government “will continue to uphold the democratic decision of the Scottish people and the promise that you made to them”. He added “for that reason, I cannot agree to any request for a transfer of power that would lead to further independence referendums”. READ MORE: SNP MP brutally shut down by Andrea Leadsom against Brexit pessimism
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Nicola Sturgeon has been left furious by the response from Boris Johnson over a second independence referendum
This sparked a furious response from Ms Sturgeon, who raged: “The problem for the Tories is the longer they try to block democracy, the more they show the Westminster union is not one of equals and fuel support for independence. “This response is predictable - but also unsustainable and self defeating. Scotland will have the right to choose.” She said the Scottish Government would set out its response and the next steps it will take before the end of January - adding she would also ask MSPs at Holyrood to “back Scotland’s right to choose our own future”. Ms Sturgeon has requested powers to be transferred, insisting there was a “democratic case” for a second ballot to be held on the issue. DON'T MISS
Sturgeon stunned as SNP claim for independence mandate is dismantled [VIDEO]
Nicola Sturgeon nightmare: SNP set for disaster and collapse in 2020 [INTERVIEW]
How Nicola Sturgeon 'silenced Brexit support within her party' [INSIGHT]
Boris Johnson has refused to bow to the demands from Nicola Sturgeon
The Prime Minister wrote to Scotland's First Minister to again outline his position on Scottish independence
Last week, a senior SNP politician called on the Scottish Parliament to bypass the Prime Minister and Westminster by calling its own second Scottish independence referendum. Former Health Secretary Alex Neil told the Daily Record bypassing Westminster would be a legal move if the Lord Advocate gave it the go-ahead. When asked what the response from ministers should be if they were told Holyrood could stage their own referendum, he beamed: “Do it!” The comments from Mr Neil are the latest in an aggressive push from the party on Indyref2, with Constitutional Relations Secretary Mike Russell claiming there are “many options” available to them.
Scottish people are largely divided over the prospect of independence
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-01-21--Boris Johnson to scrap plans for £30k minimum earning requirement for migrants post-Brexit

The proposal , which was a flagship promise of the Theresa May government , is seemingly being scrapped .
This is because , Number 10 has suggested , it would not fit in with Mr Johnson ’ s plans to introduce an Australian-style immigration system post-Brexit .
In a Cabinet meeting this morning , Mr Johnson set out his ‘ key guiding principles ’ for his new immigration system .
He promised that unskilled immigration would be significantly reduced as part of the new system .
Mr Johnson also vowed that the number of people moving to the UK would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is due to be rolled out in full in January 2021 , with old plans for border control changes to be ditched .
The £30,000 figure drew controversy , as it was stated that those who were not particularly well-paid , but were highly skilled , could be barred from entering the UK .
When asked about whether the figure was discussed in the Cabinet meeting , a spokesman for the Prime Minister said : “ It wasn ’ t .
That is something we asked MAC ( Migration Advisory Committee ) to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and I would expect that to be published shortly as well .
“ I think it is worth pointing out that that obviously reflects the immigration system set out by the former government .
“ The Prime Minister is looking at an Australian-style points-based system which is something slightly different.
” READ MORE : Boris will END health tourism charging non-Brits £625 to use NHS The Migration Advisory Committee which the spokesman refers to , was approached by then Home Secretary Sajid Javid last summer .
Mr Javid is understood to have demanded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether Mrs May ’ s original immigration plans were achievable .
The MAC will be publishing a report on the matter in the near future , with a government review to be released next week .
It is the findings of these combined reports which will assist and advise the government going forward .
DO N'T MISS : Dominic Cummings ’ brilliant point about immigration outside EU [ REVEALED ] Tory minister squirms over Boris Johnson 's immigration plans [ INTERVIEW ] Boris 's firm message to illegal immigrants : 'We 'll send @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Prime Minister ’ s spokesman added : “ The public have been clear that they want us to end freedom of movement and take back control of our borders and it is our duty to deliver on this promise .
“ The Prime Minister said that the key guiding principles of the new system would be taking back control , unleashing global talent , and attracting the brightest and the best , and reducing unskilled immigration.
” The new system is expected to come into force on New Year ’ s Day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exiting the EU comes to an end .
Mrs May ’ s government had suggested that new immigration policy could be slowly phased in , but Mr Johnson ’ s government seems to have scrapped this idea as well .
Freedom of movement rules will continue to be in force until an agreement is reached by the UK and EU .
Under current rules , citizens of EU member states are entitled to look for a job in another EU country , work there without a permit , reside there for that purpose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has finished .

Iain Duncan Smith discusses post-Brexit immigration
The proposal, which was a flagship promise of the Theresa May government, is seemingly being scrapped. This is because, Number 10 has suggested, it would not fit in with Mr Johnson’s plans to introduce an Australian-style immigration system post-Brexit. In a Cabinet meeting this morning, Mr Johnson set out his ‘key guiding principles’ for his new immigration system.
He promised that unskilled immigration would be significantly reduced as part of the new system. Mr Johnson also vowed that the number of people moving to the UK would also be cut. The replacement system is due to be rolled out in full in January 2021, with old plans for border control changes to be ditched. The £30,000 figure drew controversy, as it was stated that those who were not particularly well-paid, but were highly skilled, could be barred from entering the UK.
Mr Johnson has ditched Mrs May's plans on immigration
Mr Johnson wishes to implement an Australian-style points-based system
When asked about whether the figure was discussed in the Cabinet meeting, a spokesman for the Prime Minister said: “It wasn’t. That is something we asked MAC (Migration Advisory Committee) to do a separate piece of work on and I would expect that to be published shortly as well. “I think it is worth pointing out that that obviously reflects the immigration system set out by the former government. “The Prime Minister is looking at an Australian-style points-based system which is something slightly different.” READ MORE: Boris will END health tourism charging non-Brits £625 to use NHS
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Sajid Javid is instrumental in these immigration plans
The Migration Advisory Committee which the spokesman refers to, was approached by then Home Secretary Sajid Javid last summer. Mr Javid is understood to have demanded that the independent Migration Advisory Committee examine whether Mrs May’s original immigration plans were achievable. The MAC will be publishing a report on the matter in the near future, with a government review to be released next week. It is the findings of these combined reports which will assist and advise the government going forward. DON'T MISS:
Dominic Cummings’ brilliant point about immigration outside EU [REVEALED]
Tory minister squirms over Boris Johnson's immigration plans [INTERVIEW]
Boris's firm message to illegal immigrants: 'We'll send you back!' [SHOCK]
Mr Johnson and Mr Javid are expected to work together to chart a new immigration path
Mrs May planned to phase in new immigration plans
The Prime Minister’s spokesman added: “The public have been clear that they want us to end freedom of movement and take back control of our borders and it is our duty to deliver on this promise. “The Prime Minister said that the key guiding principles of the new system would be taking back control, unleashing global talent, and attracting the brightest and the best, and reducing unskilled immigration.” The new system is expected to come into force on New Year’s Day 2021, once the transition period of exiting the EU comes to an end.
The economics of a hard Brexit
Mrs May’s government had suggested that new immigration policy could be slowly phased in, but Mr Johnson’s government seems to have scrapped this idea as well. Freedom of movement rules will continue to be in force until an agreement is reached by the UK and EU. Under current rules, citizens of EU member states are entitled to look for a job in another EU country, work there without a permit, reside there for that purpose, and stay there even after employment has finished.
Mr Johnson did not discuss the £300k figure in cabinet today
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-01-22--BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg silences Nicola Sturgeon’s Scottish independence call with warning


thedailyexpress--2020-01-22--‘Travesty of democracy!’ Britons furious over House of Lords bid to change Brexit

And their calls have been backed by Brexiteer MP Daniel Kawczynski , who said the Lords needed to replaced by a legislature of elected senators - much like the United States - as well as pointing the finger at former Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg .
Despite last month ’ s emphatic general election victory , and the Withdrawal Agreement Bill ’ s safe passage through the House of Commons , Mr Johnson is still racing against the clock to deliver Brexit by January 31 , and suffered three defeats in the Lords last night - with more losses yesterday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amendments .
The Lords backed a Liberal Democrat amendment offering eligible EU citizens in Britain an automatic right to stay after Brexit , rather than having to apply to the government to do so , by 270 to 229 .
After that they voted by 241 to 205 , to delete powers which would allow lower courts to overturn rulings of the European Court of Justice .
Almost immediately after that , the House approved an amendment which permitting cases to be referred to the Supreme Court to adjudicate on whether to depart @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Express.co.uk ’ s Facebook page , Tony Reid said : “ The House of Lords trying to justify how important they are .
“ An absolute waste of time and finance keeping this shower in work .
“ They need to be disbanded , a complete shambles.
” Tony Gurney said : “ Just proves that the Lords needs to be changed or abolished .
It ’ s a joke and a travesty of democracy .
JUST IN : DUH !
We got it wrong !
IMF FINALLY admits Brexit Britain will boom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are NOT elected , our MPs were , to carry out our wishes .
Abolish the house of lords immediately !
” David Hulmes was also angry , saying : “ Despite what they say , the unelected elite are still up to their dirty tricks to try and frustrate the will of the people .
Pond life !
Terry Wallace claimed : “ Here we go again remainers at it again in house of lords we should close this establishment down.
” DO N'T MISS : BBC bias : How John Major @ @ @ @ @ @ @ INSIGHT ] Ruth Davidson explains why SNP have NO mandate for Indyref2 [ REVEALED ] John Bercow claimed £367 for car to Luton – to give speech on expenses [ ANALYSIS ] Meanwhile Stephen Dibben took the opportunity to make a point about controversial House of Commons Speaker John Bercow .
He said : “ That ’ s why we don ’ t want Bercow in the Lords .
He will block everything.
” Not everybody was quite so emphatic though - Colin J Moon said : “ The Lords can ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without reading up on this , isn ’ t this a good idea as it would stop EU citizens not already here coming here after Brexit and saying that they were here already and so can work ?
” Shrewsbury and Atcham MP Mr Kawczynski , who previously hit the headlines after meeting with barristers to discuss a possible legal challenge to the Benn Act which sought to prevent a no-deal Brexit , said : “ We have a system whereby Nick Clegg could stuff the Lords with countless new Lib Dem Peers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cameron government .
“ Despite the Lib Dem being totally rejected by electorate , Clegg ’ s legacy lives on making the Lords unrepresentative .
“ The sooner we have an elected Senate of 100 Senators the better , reducing the costs associated with it and making this chamber representative of the Electorate .
”


thedailyexpress--2020-01-22--Brexit deal latest: Will the House of Lords approve the Brexit deal today?

After two days of debating in the Lords , the house voted in favour of five amendments to the bill @ @ @ @ @ of Commons must now debate and vote on the peers ’ proposed changes .
Can @ @ @ @ @ House of Lords role explained Will the House of Lords approve the Brexit deal today @ @ @ @ @ voted in favour of three amendments to the Withdrawal Agreement Bill on Tuesday .
One @ @ @ @ @ of Lords would allow EU citizens in the UK an automatic right to stay , @ @ @ @ @ apply to the Home Office .
This would ensure the EU nationals they can get @ @ @ @ @ .
The Upper House voted by 241 to 205 to delete powers allowing lower courts @ @ @ @ @ European Court of Justice .
READ MORE : EU civil war : Commission sparks backlash @ @ @ @ @ EU after Brexit

Brexit: House of Lords vote to amend Johnson’s WAB
After two days of debating in the Lords, the house voted in favour of five amendments to the bill. That means the House of Commons must now debate and vote on the peers’ proposed changes.
Will the House of Lords approve the Brexit deal today? The House of Lords voted in favour of three amendments to the Withdrawal Agreement Bill on Tuesday. One change passed by the House of Lords would allow EU citizens in the UK an automatic right to stay, as opposed to having to apply to the Home Office. This would ensure the EU nationals they can get physical proof of their rights. The Upper House voted by 241 to 205 to delete powers allowing lower courts to overturn rulings of the European Court of Justice. READ MORE: EU civil war: Commission sparks backlash with watered-down plans to reform EU after Brexit
Brexit deal latest: Will the House of Lords approve the Brexit deal today?
READ MORE ‘Travesty of democracy’ Brexiteers vent fury at House of Lords And later it approved an amendment which permits cases to be referred to the Supreme Court to adjudicate on whether to depart from EU case law. Peers have also voted in favour of an amendment that would require the Government to maintain the principle of family reunion for child refugees fleeing from conflict. The House of Lords also backed calls to reassure Scotland and Wales on devolution powers. All of the UK’s devolved law-making bodies have voted against the withdrawal agreement legislation.
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Passage of a bill through Parliament
No 10 said it was “disappointed” with the amendments
READ MORE Don’t trust slippery Boris on Brexit - here’s why No 10 said it was “disappointed” with the amendments and committed to protecting vulnerable children. The Prime Minister’s spokesman said: “We are disappointed the Lords have chosen to amend the withdrawal agreement bill, which the Commons passed unamended with a majority of 99. “Protecting vulnerable children will remain our priority after Brexit, and the withdrawal agreement bill reaffirms our commitment while clarifying the role of parliament and government in negotiations. “We will seek to overturn this amendment as the bill returns to the Commons.”
Lord Alf Dubs, opposition member of the House of Lords, wants to stop a watering down of the government's future commitments to unaccompanied children
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-01-22--Nicola Sturgeon left red-faced as Scotland ‘underperforms in key areas’ since devolution

A new report has shown how Scotland fell five places between 2006 and 2018 in the list of 32 countries which are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ( OECD ) .
The ranking relates to tests on a string of measures including income , life expectancy and education .
The nation , which now sits in the bottom half of the list , has “ underperformed ” in many fields since Scots voted for devolution in a 1997 referendum .
The Index of Social and Economic Wellbeing ( ISEW ) report lays out how Scotland scored @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 0.5 since 2006 .
It ranks number 21 in a list topped by Switzerland ( 3.38 ) , Norway ( 2.01 ) and Japan ( 3.00 ) .
Greece finished last in the ranking , as it was given a score of 0.66 , below Hungary ( 0.88 ) and Slovakia ( 0.92 ) .
The average life expectancy , which stands at 79 years , was noted as Scotland ’ s weakest area of performance .
Economist John McLaren of the Scottish Trends website produced the report .
He pointed to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reason for the decline in the policy .
He wrote : “ There is a lack of being held to account over policy decisions , in other words too little scrutiny and proper evaluation of the actions of the Scottish government .
“ This is down to a variety of shortcomings , including a weak committee system in the parliament , a lack of academic involvement , a dearth of think tanks , poorly funded political parties and a declining and underfunded media presence.
” READ MORE : SNP MP brutally shut down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also argued that badly-funded opposition parties in the Scottish parliament in Edinburgh had meant a lack of competition for Ms Sturgeon ’ s Scottish National Party ( SNP ) .
Mr McLaren explained : “ Outside of the SNP , Scotland ’ s political parties are either small operations or in effect branch operations of UK parties and in both cases poorly funded .
“ This has inhibited the development of alternative policy ideas and led to a lack of political competition , as their operations are relatively ineffectual in challenging the well-funded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) , SNP-led government.
” DO N'T MISS Nicola Sturgeon : Gordon Brown argues there is 'no case ' for indy ref [ INSIGHT ] SNP 's independence bid could trigger Greece-style economic collapse [ ANALYSIS ] Polling guru John Curtice shocks Nicola Sturgeon with independence [ SHOCK ] MSP and former leader of the Scottish Conservatives Ruth Davidson responded to the report by slamming the Government for a recent debate on the flying of an EU flag outside Holyrood .
She tweeted : “ Underperformance in health , education , life expectancy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Yet last week ’ s big , synthetic fight from the Scottish government was not on how to improve these failings , but on which squares of cloth flap out the front of Holyrood.
” Managers of the Scottish parliament have said the EU flag will be removed from outside Holyrood when the UK leaves the bloc on January 31 .
Conservative MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine , Andrew Bowie , blamed the SNP for the poor performance .
He said : “ Scotland can and must do better than this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve fallen behind in almost every key area .
“ We must end this downward spiral .
Let ’ s stop the constitutional grievance and actually get on making Scotland a better place to live , work and invest.
” Meanwhile , Ms Sturgeon clashed with Boris Johnson last week after he slapped down her formal request for another indyref .

Sturgeon has 'no case' for a second referendum says Brown
A new report has shown how Scotland fell five places between 2006 and 2018 in the list of 32 countries which are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The ranking relates to tests on a string of measures including income, life expectancy and education. The nation, which now sits in the bottom half of the list, has “underperformed” in many fields since Scots voted for devolution in a 1997 referendum.
The Index of Social and Economic Wellbeing (ISEW) report lays out how Scotland scored 2.08 in 2018, a drop of 0.5 since 2006. It ranks number 21 in a list topped by Switzerland (3.38), Norway (2.01) and Japan (3.00). Greece finished last in the ranking, as it was given a score of 0.66, below Hungary (0.88) and Slovakia (0.92). The average life expectancy, which stands at 79 years, was noted as Scotland’s weakest area of performance.
A new report has shown the wellbeing of Scots is now on par with Slovenia
Nicola Sturgeon has repeatedly called for another Scottish independence referendum
Economist John McLaren of the Scottish Trends website produced the report. He pointed to a lack of accountability in Holyrood as the reason for the decline in the policy. He wrote: “There is a lack of being held to account over policy decisions, in other words too little scrutiny and proper evaluation of the actions of the Scottish government. “This is down to a variety of shortcomings, including a weak committee system in the parliament, a lack of academic involvement, a dearth of think tanks, poorly funded political parties and a declining and underfunded media presence.” READ MORE: SNP MP brutally shut down by Andrea Leadsom against Brexit pessimism
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Economist John McLaren said poorly-funded opposition parties were to blame for a lack of competition in Holyrood
He also argued that badly-funded opposition parties in the Scottish parliament in Edinburgh had meant a lack of competition for Ms Sturgeon’s Scottish National Party (SNP). Mr McLaren explained: “Outside of the SNP, Scotland’s political parties are either small operations or in effect branch operations of UK parties and in both cases poorly funded. “This has inhibited the development of alternative policy ideas and led to a lack of political competition, as their operations are relatively ineffectual in challenging the well-funded and civil service-supported (in technical terms), SNP-led government.” DON'T MISS
Nicola Sturgeon: Gordon Brown argues there is 'no case' for indy ref [INSIGHT]
SNP's independence bid could trigger Greece-style economic collapse [ANALYSIS]
Polling guru John Curtice shocks Nicola Sturgeon with independence [SHOCK]
Nicola Sturgeon speaks at an event on Monday to announce further funding for the 'Stay in Scotland' campaign
SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon has been blamed for the fall in Scots' wellbeing
MSP and former leader of the Scottish Conservatives Ruth Davidson responded to the report by slamming the Government for a recent debate on the flying of an EU flag outside Holyrood. She tweeted: “Underperformance in health, education, life expectancy and a clutch of other areas. “Yet last week’s big, synthetic fight from the Scottish government was not on how to improve these failings, but on which squares of cloth flap out the front of Holyrood.” Managers of the Scottish parliament have said the EU flag will be removed from outside Holyrood when the UK leaves the bloc on January 31.
Nicola Sturgeon's formal request for another indyref was slapped down by Boris Johnson
Conservative MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, Andrew Bowie, blamed the SNP for the poor performance. He said: “Scotland can and must do better than this. Under the SNP, we’ve fallen behind in almost every key area. “We must end this downward spiral. Let’s stop the constitutional grievance and actually get on making Scotland a better place to live, work and invest.” Meanwhile, Ms Sturgeon clashed with Boris Johnson last week after he slapped down her formal request for another indyref.
Former Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson slammed the SNP after the report was published
Trending