thedailyexpress--2020-02-17--Boris Johnson will tell the EU to follow BRITISH laws after bloc demanded UK copy Brussels

The Prime Minister ’ s chief negotiator challenged his European counterparts to respond to similar demands they have set out that would see the EU policing UK state aid rules , regulating UK taxes and permanently aligning Britain with its standards .
In a speech tonight at the Universite Libre de Bruxelles , David Frost said : “ We bring to the negotiations not some clever tactical positioning but the fundamentals of what it means to be an independent country .
“ It is central to our vision that we must have the ability to set laws that suit us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other non-EU country in the world has .
“ So to think that we might accept EU supervision on so called level playing field issues simply fails to see the point of what we are doing .
“ It isn ’ t a simple negotiating position which might move under pressure – it is the point of the whole project .
That ’ s also why we will not extend the transition beyond the end of this year .
At that point we recover our political and economic independence in full – why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ In short , we only want what other independent countries have.
” Mr Frost , who has been put in charge of dozens of officials as part of Task Force Europe , will negotiate the UK ’ s future terms with Brussels .
Addressing academics and students , he said Britain would maintain higher standards on workers ’ rights , environmental protections and health than many of the EU ’ s remaining 27 member states .
In talks with Michel Barnier , the bloc ’ s chief negotiator , he will argue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minimum wage than 23 out of the 27 EU countries .
Mr Frost said : “ Boris Johnson ’ s speech in Greenwich two weeks ago set out a record of consistently high standards of regulation and behaviour in the UK , in many cases better than EU norms or practice .
READ MORE : EU makes ridiculous Brexit demands for UK in shock resolution “ How would you feel if the UK demanded that , to protect ourselves , the EU dynamically harmonise with our national laws set in Westminster and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
“ The more thoughtful would say that such an approach would compromise the EU ’ s sovereign legal order ; that there would be no democratic legitimacy in the EU for the decisions taken in the UK to which the EU would be bound ; and that such regulations and regulatory decisions are so fundamental to the way the population of a territory feels bound into the legitimacy of its government , that this structure would be simply unsustainable : at some point democratic consent would snap – dramatically and finally.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Mr Frost conceded that Britain would sign up to “ open and fair competition provisions ” based on the bloc ’ s other free-trade agreements .
He called on the bloc to “ build on ” its current relations with Britain .
DO N'T MISS : Two-year Brexit DELAY must be agreed by July 1 – EU document [ INSIGHT ] Boris Johnson rubbishes EU with THREE examples of backtracking [ LIVE BLOG ] How Boris Johnson could sign US trade deal ‘ promise ’ before November [ LATEST ] “ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ open and fair competition provisions based on FTA precedent is not that we want a minimalist outcome on competition laws , ” he said .
“ It is that the model of an FTA and the precedents contained in actual agreed FTAs are the most appropriate ones for the relationship of sovereign entities in highly sensitive areas relating to how their jurisdictions are governed and how their populations give consent to that government .
“ So if it is true , as we hear from our friends in the Commission and the 27 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and sustainable relationship in this highly sensitive area , the only way forward is to build on this approach of a relationship of equals.
” David Frost also said : `` In a country like Britain where institutions just evolved , it was going to feel a bit unnatural to a lot of people to belong to an organisation whose institutions were created by design .
`` That ’ s why ‘ take back control ’ became such a powerful slogan .
To be honest , that ’ s not really understood here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to find it odd that people from would support Brexit .
`` We were never really in my view committed to the same goals at all .
Some people now argue the UK had itself in the sweet spot on in the Union… Carelessly cast aside in 2016 – that ’ s not entirely realistic .
`` The UK was like a guest who had enough at the party and was trying to find a way of slipping out .
We were already in the hallway .
`` We never knew what we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other countries doing what other countries wanted to do .
`` It ’ s so bizarre that people told themselves that Britain was winning the arguments or the EU is a British project .
It ’ s clearly not .
Brexit was a reality .
‘ Take back control ’ was the slogan because we had lost that control .
`` Barnier said last month that Brexit was always damage limitation .
I believe that ’ s wrong and I will explain why .
`` This unproven decline in trade will have implausibly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future .
But that ’ s evidence that productivity drives trade . ''
The tough words from the UK ’ s negotiator will be seen as a challenge by France ’ s President Emmanuel Macron , who is understood to be prepared to pursue a no-deal scenario if his demands aren ’ t met .
Paris wants to make any deal conditional on European trawlermen being granted continued access to British fishing waters .
Mr Macron also wants tough terms imposed on future access to European markets for the City of London .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ balanced ” approach to the EU ’ s demands .
EU ambassadors are expected to conclude the bloc ’ s negotiating mandate on Wednesday with the “ level-playing field ” still an outstanding issue .
They are hoping to conclude their internal discussions so Mr Barnier ’ s guidelines can be adopted at an EU ministerial council on February 25 .

Brexit: Johnson 'refuses to accept level playing field' says expert
The Prime Minister’s chief negotiator challenged his European counterparts to respond to similar demands they have set out that would see the EU policing UK state aid rules, regulating UK taxes and permanently aligning Britain with its standards. In a speech tonight at the Universite Libre de Bruxelles, David Frost said: “We bring to the negotiations not some clever tactical positioning but the fundamentals of what it means to be an independent country.
“It is central to our vision that we must have the ability to set laws that suit us – to claim the right that every other non-EU country in the world has. “So to think that we might accept EU supervision on so called level playing field issues simply fails to see the point of what we are doing. “It isn’t a simple negotiating position which might move under pressure – it is the point of the whole project. That’s also why we will not extend the transition beyond the end of this year. At that point we recover our political and economic independence in full – why would we want to postpone it? “In short, we only want what other independent countries have.”
Boris Johnson has challenged the EU to follow UK laws after Brexit
Mr Frost, who has been put in charge of dozens of officials as part of Task Force Europe, will negotiate the UK’s future terms with Brussels. Addressing academics and students, he said Britain would maintain higher standards on workers’ rights, environmental protections and health than many of the EU’s remaining 27 member states. In talks with Michel Barnier, the bloc’s chief negotiator, he will argue that the UK already has a higher minimum wage than 23 out of the 27 EU countries. Mr Frost said: “Boris Johnson’s speech in Greenwich two weeks ago set out a record of consistently high standards of regulation and behaviour in the UK, in many cases better than EU norms or practice. READ MORE: EU makes ridiculous Brexit demands for UK in shock resolution
Boris Johnson's EU negotiator David Frost set out the PM's demands
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
“How would you feel if the UK demanded that, to protect ourselves, the EU dynamically harmonise with our national laws set in Westminster and the decisions of our own regulators and courts? “The more thoughtful would say that such an approach would compromise the EU’s sovereign legal order; that there would be no democratic legitimacy in the EU for the decisions taken in the UK to which the EU would be bound; and that such regulations and regulatory decisions are so fundamental to the way the population of a territory feels bound into the legitimacy of its government, that this structure would be simply unsustainable: at some point democratic consent would snap – dramatically and finally.” But after a dramatic challenge to Brussels, Mr Frost conceded that Britain would sign up to “open and fair competition provisions” based on the bloc’s other free-trade agreements. He called on the bloc to “build on” its current relations with Britain. DON'T MISS:
Two-year Brexit DELAY must be agreed by July 1 – EU document [INSIGHT]
Boris Johnson rubbishes EU with THREE examples of backtracking [LIVE BLOG]
How Boris Johnson could sign US trade deal ‘promise’ before November [LATEST]
Michel Barnier and David Frost will start trade deal negotiations in March
Brexit: Von der Leyen makes dig at Johnson over Australia deal
“The reason we expect – for example - open and fair competition provisions based on FTA precedent is not that we want a minimalist outcome on competition laws,” he said. “It is that the model of an FTA and the precedents contained in actual agreed FTAs are the most appropriate ones for the relationship of sovereign entities in highly sensitive areas relating to how their jurisdictions are governed and how their populations give consent to that government. “So if it is true, as we hear from our friends in the Commission and the 27, that the EU wants a durable and sustainable relationship in this highly sensitive area, the only way forward is to build on this approach of a relationship of equals.” David Frost also said: "In a country like Britain where institutions just evolved, it was going to feel a bit unnatural to a lot of people to belong to an organisation whose institutions were created by design. "That’s why ‘take back control’ became such a powerful slogan. To be honest, that’s not really understood here in Brussels. So many commentators seem to find it odd that people from would support Brexit. "We were never really in my view committed to the same goals at all. Some people now argue the UK had itself in the sweet spot on in the Union… Carelessly cast aside in 2016 – that’s not entirely realistic.
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-02-17--How much?! Parliament spends £28k of taxpayer money on lavish Westminster furniture

Swanky new tables , armchairs and sofas appeared in the Westminster office building emerged at the office today , sparking fury on social media when Cabinet minister Therese Coffey criticised the move on Twitter .
She said : “ I see House authorities have brought in sofas and luxury armchairs to the Atrium in Portcullis House .
I ’ m not a skinflint but really ?
?
I hope these are donated/pro nono ( sic ) as an advert not taxpayers ’ money.
” The Work and Pensions Secretary added : “ These are the same House authorities that don @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lighting for a working environment , helped by the fact that we are in a Royal Palace and not technically subject to health and safety legislation ( though they take a lot of it seriously ) .
” One commenter said : “ Of course the tax payer paid , but they should last 20 years.
” Another asked : “ Perhaps you could update here when you find out Therese ?
” A third said simply : “ So do we !
” The bill is believed to have amounted to £27,766 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken from an existing budget .
Eight armchairs worth more than £1,000 each were part of the haul from manufacturer Orangebox .
Teal sofas and six leather chairs were also included .
A House of Commons spokesman said : “ Portcullis House is a hugely popular and valued building on the estate used by MPs and staff for dining , cafe facilities and as a meeting place .
“ In recent years Portcullis House has become a central point for parliamentary business .
“ In view of the increasing demand , we have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” The Taxpayers ’ Alliance campaign group said the Commons should be “ saving every penny of taxpayer cash possible ” following news of the refurbishment .
Duncan Simpson , its research director , said : “ If Parliament is sitting on this kind of cash then it shouldn ’ t be splashing it on sofas just so that MPs can sit and slope in slightly greater comfort .
“ Plenty of politicians are perfectly happy with what they already have in Portcullis House and if anything would probably prefer more office equipment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ day jobs .
DO N'T MISS : Strictly Come Dancing : John Bercow grilled on joining 2020 line-up [ NEWS ] Big Ben restoration costs soar to £80MILLION – thanks to John Bercow [ INSIGHT ] John Bercow makes brutal dig at ‘ deeply snobbish ’ David Cameron [ ANALYSIS ]

John Bercow says he is 'astonished' at bullying allegations
Swanky new tables, armchairs and sofas appeared in the Westminster office building emerged at the office today, sparking fury on social media when Cabinet minister Therese Coffey criticised the move on Twitter. She said: “I see House authorities have brought in sofas and luxury armchairs to the Atrium in Portcullis House. I’m not a skinflint but really?? I hope these are donated/pro nono (sic) as an advert not taxpayers’ money.”
The Work and Pensions Secretary added: “These are the same House authorities that don’t provide appropriate office chairs or lighting for a working environment, helped by the fact that we are in a Royal Palace and not technically subject to health and safety legislation (though they take a lot of it seriously).” Her remarks triggered anger on social media. One commenter said: “Of course the tax payer paid, but they should last 20 years.” Another asked: “Perhaps you could update here when you find out Therese?” A third said simply: “So do we!”
Swanky new tables, armchairs and sofas appeared in the Westminster office
The bill is believed to have amounted to £27,766, excluding VAT
The bill is believed to have amounted to £27,766, excluding VAT. The amount was taken from an existing budget. Eight armchairs worth more than £1,000 each were part of the haul from manufacturer Orangebox. Teal sofas and six leather chairs were also included. A House of Commons spokesman said: “Portcullis House is a hugely popular and valued building on the estate used by MPs and staff for dining, cafe facilities and as a meeting place. READ NOW: John Bercow addresses bullying claims calling victims ‘entitled’ [NEWS]
John Bercow was condemned for using taxpayer money on a new washing machine for his nanny
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
“In recent years Portcullis House has become a central point for parliamentary business. “In view of the increasing demand, we have adapted the courtyard to increase its capacity.” The Taxpayers’ Alliance campaign group said the Commons should be “saving every penny of taxpayer cash possible” following news of the refurbishment. Duncan Simpson, its research director, said: “If Parliament is sitting on this kind of cash then it shouldn’t be splashing it on sofas just so that MPs can sit and slope in slightly greater comfort. “Plenty of politicians are perfectly happy with what they already have in Portcullis House and if anything would probably prefer more office equipment to help them get on with their day jobs. DON'T MISS:
Strictly Come Dancing: John Bercow grilled on joining 2020 line-up [NEWS]
Big Ben restoration costs soar to £80MILLION – thanks to John Bercow [INSIGHT]
John Bercow makes brutal dig at ‘deeply snobbish’ David Cameron [ANALYSIS]
I see House authorities have brought in sofas and luxury armchairs to the Atrium in Portcullis House. I'm not a skinflint but really?? I hope these are donated/pro nono as an advert not taxpayers' money. — Therese Coffey (@theresecoffey) February 17, 2020
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-02-17--Labour civil war: Long-Bailey sparks sexism row by attacking Nandy for maternity leave

Ms Long-Bailey ’ s campaign team have been accused of starting a sexism row after a secret document emerged highlighting how to attack Ms Nandy .
An internal document used by Ms Long-Bailey instructed volunteers to claim Ms Nandy was the only one of the remaining three candidates “ who opposed the 2015 welfare bill ” .
But supporters of Ms Nandy hit back by pointing out the reason the Wigan MP missed the vote was because she had just given birth .
They also added Ms Nandy voted after having the child .
The document is believed to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign Momentum , who are pushing for Ms Long-Bailey to be the next leader of the Labour Party .
Website Red Roar uncovered the document that aims to boost support for Ms Long-Bailey while smearing her rivals .
In the section called “ Trust ” it refers to Ms Nandy as being “ the only candidate who provided consistent support to Jeremy Corbyn , nominating him in 2015 and 2016 , serving in the Shadow Cabinet 2016-2019 , and regularly defending his policies and vision on the national media.
” It added : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Group MPs , and two of the UK ’ s biggest unions .

Labour: Lisa Nandy admits party 'hasn’t learned its lessons'
Ms Long-Bailey’s campaign team have been accused of starting a sexism row after a secret document emerged highlighting how to attack Ms Nandy. An internal document used by Ms Long-Bailey instructed volunteers to claim Ms Nandy was the only one of the remaining three candidates “who opposed the 2015 welfare bill”. But supporters of Ms Nandy hit back by pointing out the reason the Wigan MP missed the vote was because she had just given birth.
They also added Ms Nandy voted after having the child. The document is believed to have been created by the far left grassroots campaign Momentum, who are pushing for Ms Long-Bailey to be the next leader of the Labour Party. Website Red Roar uncovered the document that aims to boost support for Ms Long-Bailey while smearing her rivals. In the section called “Trust” it refers to Ms Nandy as being “the only candidate who provided consistent support to Jeremy Corbyn, nominating him in 2015 and 2016, serving in the Shadow Cabinet 2016-2019, and regularly defending his policies and vision on the national media.” It added: “Backed by nearly all Socialist Campaign Group MPs, and two of the UK’s biggest unions.
Ms Long-Bailey’s campaign team have been accused of starting a sexism row
The sexism row comes on the same day Ms Nandy sparked a debate of transgender rights
“The only leadership candidate who opposed the 2015 welfare bill.” Momentum has also produced a video attacking Ms Nandy for missing the vote. Ms Nandy campaign chairwoman Louise Haigh said: “It is really disappointing to see Momentum continue to attack a leadership candidate for having been on maternity leave. “What message does this send to young women worried about balancing politics with having a family?” A spokesman for the Long-Bailey campaign refused to comment on the document. READ NOW: Labour leadership odds latest: Who will be the next Labour leader? [ANALYSIS]
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
The document is believed to have been created by the far left grassroots campaign Momentum
Momentum last month balloted their members on who they wanted as leader of the party - but Ms Long-Bailey was the only candidate option for the role in the grassroots survey. Jon Lansman, who leads the group, is also advising Ms Long-Bailey on her campaign. The sexism row comes on the same day Ms Nandy sparked a debate of transgender rights. The leadership candidate said male child rapists who transition to become women should be allowed to serve their sentences in female-only prisons. Critics of the idea said it could put female inmates at harm. DON'T MISS:
Long-Bailey backs Corbyn for future Labour role despite poll disaster [NEWS]
John McDonnell told off by BBC's Pienaar for calling Sunak a 'stooge' [INSIGHT]
GMB’s Richard Madeley slams Dawn Butler over Labour election defeat [ANAYSIS]
Emily Thornberry is out of the contest
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-02-17--Labour leadership odds latest: Who will be the next Labour Party leader?

Just three candidates remain in the running - shadow business secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey , Wigan MP Lisa Nandy and shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer .
Whoever wins faces a major challenge ahead , with the party holding its lowest number of seats in the House of Commons since 1935 .
Labour ’ s own internal review , leaked to the Financial Times , points the finger of blame at divisions over the party ’ s Brexit policy - and dismisses criticism of its “ radical ” manifesto and leader Jeremy Corbyn .
The three contenders to replace Mr Corbyn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ version of what went wrong and how they ’ d fix it - below is a look at each candidate and their odds , courtesy of The Pools .
READ MORE : Labour leadership debate : How to watch debate LIVE tonight Odds : Polling as most likely to take the job , with 1/8 odds ( 88.5 percent ) Who is he ?
Sir Keir was born in 1962 in Southwark , London , to his parents Rod - a toolmaker , and Josephine - a nurse .
Named after Labour ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he was one of four children and the first to pass the 11-plus , getting him a place at Reigate Grammar School .
From there , he went on to study law at the University of Leeds , graduating with a first in 1985 , before moving onto post-graduate qualifications at St Edmund Hall , Oxford .
He married solicitor Victoria Alexander in 2007 and the couple have two children .
The 57-year-old shadow Brexit secretary was the first to make it on to the final ballot .
Sir Kier won the backing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Usdaw , and the Socialist Environment and Resources Association ( Sera ) , an affiliate group , and workers ’ union Community .
A supporter of remaining in the EU , Sir Keir was director of public prosecutions before becoming MP for Holborn and St Pancras in 2015 .
But critics have accused him of pushing Labour into its “ renegotiate then referendum ” Brexit position ahead of the 2019 election , which produced the worst electoral defeat since 1935 .
In his candidate statement , Sir Kier said : “ I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our Labour Party because I ’ m determined to unite our movement , take on the Tories and build a better future .
“ Labour only wins when we ’ re united and when we have a radical vision of the future that people can trust.
” Odds : Polling as second most likely to take the job , with 7/1 odds ( 12.5 percent ) Who is she ?
Mrs Long-Bailey was born in Old Trafford , Greater Manchester , in 1979 .
Her father was a former docker and she has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her politics .
She started work in a pawn shop and also worked in call centres , a furniture factory and the post service .
Mrs Long-Bailey studied politics and sociology at Manchester Metropolitan University , and later studied law via part-time courses .
Her husband Stephen works for a chemicals company and they have a six-year-old son .
The 40-year-old shadow business secretary was the third candidate to make it on to the members ’ ballot after securing backing from Unite , the Bakers , Food and Allied Workers Union , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Union .
Seen as a Corbyn loyalist , she was one of a new generation of MPs on the left of the party .
She formed part of Mr Corbyn ’ s inner circle and represented Labour in an election TV debate last year .
She is widely regarded as the preferred candidate of Mr Corbyn and his shadow chancellor , John McDonnell .
But critics of the current leadership have accused her of representing “ continuity Corbyn ” .
In her candidate statement , Mrs Long-Bailey said : “ To realise collective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interests , not accommodate them .
“ Whether we live Blyth or Brixton , my vision of aspirational socialism and a democratic revolution will excite a movement for renewal.
” Odds : Polling as least likely to take the job , with 12/1 odds ( 7.69 percent ) Who is she ?
Ms Nandy was born in 1979 in Manchester to Louise and Dipak Nandy .
Her grandfather was the Liberal MP for North Dorset in the 1940s , and she has described her father as “ one of the few remaining ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the mixed comprehensive Parrs Wood High School before moving to Holy Cross College in Bury .
From there , she went on to study politics at Newcastle University , followed by a master ’ s degree in public policy from Birkbeck , University of London .
Her partner is public relations consultant Andy Collis and in April 2015 they had a son .
The 40-year-old MP for Wigan became the second candidate to secure her place on the members ’ ballot when she won the backing of affiliate group Chinese for Labour , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ GMB union and the National Union of Mineworkers .
On Friday , she also won the backing of the Jewish Labour Movement .
Ms Nandy worked in the charitable sector before entering politics in 2010 , and became one of a group of shadow ministers who resigned from Jeremy Corbyn ’ s frontbench after the Brexit referendum .
She has become known for her support of smaller towns , saying the party needs to appeal to voters outside big cities if it is to win at the next election .
In her candidate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In December , voters sent us a clear message – change , or die .
“ There are no more second chances for Labour .
”

Rebecca Long-Bailey is a ‘continuation of Corbyn’ says Marr
Nominations from MPs, party members and affiliates have now closed, and up next the ballot opens for wider party members - some 485,000 - to cast their vote. Voting will close on April 2, and the new Labour Party leader will be announced on Saturday, April 4.
Trending
Just three candidates remain in the running - shadow business secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey, Wigan MP Lisa Nandy and shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer. Whoever wins faces a major challenge ahead, with the party holding its lowest number of seats in the House of Commons since 1935. Labour’s own internal review, leaked to the Financial Times, points the finger of blame at divisions over the party’s Brexit policy - and dismisses criticism of its “radical” manifesto and leader Jeremy Corbyn. The three contenders to replace Mr Corbyn as leader have each given their own version of what went wrong and how they’d fix it - below is a look at each candidate and their odds, courtesy of The Pools. READ MORE: Labour leadership debate: How to watch debate LIVE tonight
Labour leadership odds latest: The party will elect its new leader after Corbyn
1. Sir Kier Starmer
Labour leadership odds latest: Shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Odds: Polling as most likely to take the job, with 1/8 odds (88.5 percent) Who is he? Sir Keir was born in 1962 in Southwark, London, to his parents Rod - a toolmaker, and Josephine - a nurse. Named after Labour’s first MP, Keir Hardie, he was one of four children and the first to pass the 11-plus, getting him a place at Reigate Grammar School. From there, he went on to study law at the University of Leeds, graduating with a first in 1985, before moving onto post-graduate qualifications at St Edmund Hall, Oxford. He married solicitor Victoria Alexander in 2007 and the couple have two children. Candidacy: The 57-year-old shadow Brexit secretary was the first to make it on to the final ballot. Sir Kier won the backing of Unison, the shopworkers’ union Usdaw, and the Socialist Environment and Resources Association (Sera), an affiliate group, and workers’ union Community. A supporter of remaining in the EU, Sir Keir was director of public prosecutions before becoming MP for Holborn and St Pancras in 2015. But critics have accused him of pushing Labour into its “renegotiate then referendum” Brexit position ahead of the 2019 election, which produced the worst electoral defeat since 1935. In his candidate statement, Sir Kier said: “I’m now standing to be leader of our Labour Party because I’m determined to unite our movement, take on the Tories and build a better future. “Labour only wins when we’re united and when we have a radical vision of the future that people can trust.” 2. Rebecca Long-Bailey
Labour leadership odds latest: Shadow business secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey
Odds: Polling as second most likely to take the job, with 7/1 odds (12.5 percent) Who is she? Mrs Long-Bailey was born in Old Trafford, Greater Manchester, in 1979. Her father was a former docker and she has often spoken about how his experiences influenced her politics. She started work in a pawn shop and also worked in call centres, a furniture factory and the post service. Mrs Long-Bailey studied politics and sociology at Manchester Metropolitan University, and later studied law via part-time courses. Her husband Stephen works for a chemicals company and they have a six-year-old son. Candidacy: The 40-year-old shadow business secretary was the third candidate to make it on to the members’ ballot after securing backing from Unite, the Bakers, Food and Allied Workers Union, the Communication Workers Union and the Fire Brigades Union. Seen as a Corbyn loyalist, she was one of a new generation of MPs on the left of the party. She formed part of Mr Corbyn’s inner circle and represented Labour in an election TV debate last year. She is widely regarded as the preferred candidate of Mr Corbyn and his shadow chancellor, John McDonnell. But critics of the current leadership have accused her of representing “continuity Corbyn”. In her candidate statement, Mrs Long-Bailey said: “To realise collective aspiration, Labour must take on vested interests, not accommodate them. “Whether we live Blyth or Brixton, my vision of aspirational socialism and a democratic revolution will excite a movement for renewal.” 3. Lisa Nandy
Labour leadership odds latest: Wigan MP Lisa Nandy


thedailyexpress--2020-02-17--Varadkar digs heels in as he BLOCKS grand coalition – but ‘relishes’ clinging on as leader

The outgoing Taoiseach 's ( Irish PM ) said he was opposed to his party – Fine Gael – forming a grand coalition with Fianna Fail amid continuing speculation over when the upcoming election will be held .
And despite calls for him to step down as party after his devastating defeat , Leo Varadakar insisted he would relish the challenge of leading an opposition party , according to Ireland ’ s national broadcaster RTE .
He said Fine Gael , which recorded the second-worst result in its history , would only participate in the government at a last resort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Speaking on RTE ’ s Morning Ireland , Martin Heydon , Chair of the Fine Gael Parliamentary Party , said : `` The people have spoken .
They have voted for change .
“ Fine Gael is preparing for the opposition and I think the people will need a strong and effective opposition '' .
He said his party will `` consider '' returning to Government `` as a last resort if that 's what is needed '' .
Mr Varadkar ’ s Fine Gael was the elections biggest loser , winning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the largest party on 47 .
Fine Gael got just under 20.9 percent of the vote , trailing behind rivals Fianna Fail and Sinn Fein .
Mr Varadkar has previously said the responsibility is now on Sinn Fein to form a Government , having won the highest percentage of first-preference votes .
READ MORE : Leo Varadkar ’ s contradiction has ‘ caught up with him ’ Sinn Fein has already held talks with the Greens and People Before Profit .
The outgoing Irish PM also ruled out any alliance with Sinn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an option '' as `` nobody can be forced into a forced marriage or a forced coalition '' .
He said : `` It seems that we have now a three-party system and that 's going to make forming a government quite difficult . ''
DO N'T MISS Varadkar condemned : PM 's last-ditch bid to cling to power [ INSIGHT ] Leo Varadkar ’ s true disappointment exposed in leaked emails [ OPINION ] Really , Leo ?
Varadkar to make OUTRAGEOUS demand in bid to cling on [ COMMENT ] Sinn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ told Sky News she wants to form a government without Fianna Fail or Fine Gael , the two big beast parties who have dominated Irish politics in recent decades .
She added : `` The political establishment , including Fianna Fail or Fine Gael , are in a state of denial , they 're still not listening to what the people want .
Sinn Fein surged from the fringes of the country ’ s political scene to become a mainstream party after voters flocked to support the nationalists who want to reunite the @ @ @ @

Irish election: Sinn Fein coalition ‘not an option’ says Varadkar
The outgoing Taoiseach's (Irish PM) said he was opposed to his party – Fine Gael – forming a grand coalition with Fianna Fail amid continuing speculation over when the upcoming election will be held. And despite calls for him to step down as party after his devastating defeat, Leo Varadakar insisted he would relish the challenge of leading an opposition party, according to Ireland’s national broadcaster RTE.
He said Fine Gael, which recorded the second-worst result in its history, would only participate in the government at a last resort and “if we are needed”. Speaking on RTE’s Morning Ireland, Martin Heydon, Chair of the Fine Gael Parliamentary Party, said: "The people have spoken. They have voted for change. “Fine Gael is preparing for the opposition and I think the people will need a strong and effective opposition".
Leo Varadkar has ruled out a grand coalition
He said his party will "consider" returning to Government "as a last resort if that's what is needed". Mr Varadkar’s Fine Gael was the elections biggest loser, winning only 35 seats having entered the campaign as the largest party on 47. Fine Gael got just under 20.9 percent of the vote, trailing behind rivals Fianna Fail and Sinn Fein. Mr Varadkar has previously said the responsibility is now on Sinn Fein to form a Government, having won the highest percentage of first-preference votes. READ MORE: Leo Varadkar’s contradiction has ‘caught up with him’
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Leo Varadkar's party were the biggest losers in the Irish election
Sinn Fein president Mary Lou McDonald has also told Sky News she wants to form a government without Fianna Fail or Fine Gael, the two big beast parties who have dominated Irish politics in recent decades. She added: "The political establishment, including Fianna Fail or Fine Gael, are in a state of denial, they're still not listening to what the people want. Sinn Fein surged from the fringes of the country’s political scene to become a mainstream party after voters flocked to support the nationalists who want to reunite the island of Ireland.
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-02-17--Labour leadership debate: How to watch debate LIVE tonight - who is participating?

The role of Labour Party leader is up for grabs after Jeremy Corbyn announced he would step down following the party ’ s disastrous general election results in December .
Now , the party must decide who tries to rebuild Labour support and form a strong opposition government .
How to watch the debate The Labour leadership debate will air live on Monday , February 17 at 8pm on Channel 4 .
You can catch the debate on your TV , or head to the website HERE to watch live .
READ MORE : Corbyn comeback : Disgraced leader could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remaining candidates will participate in Monday ’ s debate .
Shadow business secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey , Wigan MP Lisa Nandy and shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer are all still in the running .
We ’ ll find out who takes the top job on April 4 .
A brief profile on each candidate : The 40-year-old shadow business secretary was the third candidate to make it on to the members ’ ballot after securing backing from Unite , the Bakers , Food and Allied Workers Union , the Communication Workers Union and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Corbyn loyalist , she was one of a new generation of MPs on the left of the party .
She formed part of Mr Corbyn ’ s inner circle and represented Labour in an election TV debate last year .
She is widely regarded as the preferred candidate of Mr Corbyn and his shadow chancellor , John McDonnell .
But critics of the current leadership have accused her of representing “ continuity Corbyn ” .
In her candidate statement , Ms Long-Bailey said : “ To realise collective aspiration , Labour must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them .
“ Whether we live Blyth or Brixton , my vision of aspirational socialism and a democratic revolution will excite a movement for renewal.
” The 40-year-old MP for Wigan became the second candidate to secure her place on the members ’ ballot when she won the backing of affiliate group Chinese for Labour , on top of being backed by the GMB union and the National Union of Mineworkers .
On Friday , she also won the backing of the Jewish Labour Movement .
Ms Nandy worked in the charitable sector @ @ @ @ @ @ @ became one of a group of shadow ministers who resigned from Jeremy Corbyn ’ s frontbench after the Brexit referendum .
She has become known for her support of smaller towns , saying the party needs to appeal to voters outside big cities if it is to win at the next election .
In her candidate statement , Ms Nandy said : “ In December , voters sent us a clear message – change , or die .
“ There are no more second chances for Labour .
”

Labour leadership: Starmer is 'not politically defined' says peer
The role of Labour Party leader is up for grabs after Jeremy Corbyn announced he would step down following the party’s disastrous general election results in December. Now, the party must decide who tries to rebuild Labour support and form a strong opposition government.
Trending
How to watch the debate The Labour leadership debate will air live on Monday, February 17 at 8pm on Channel 4. You can catch the debate on your TV, or head to the website HERE to watch live. Channel 4 news anchor Krishnan Guru-Murthy will chair the debate. READ MORE: Corbyn comeback: Disgraced leader could be offered top front bench
Labour leadership debate: The three remaining candidates will participate
Labour leadership debate: Tonight's host Krishnan Guru-Murthy with current leader Jeremy Corbyn
READ MORE Long-Bailey backs Corbyn for future Labour role despite poll disaster Who will participate? All three remaining candidates will participate in Monday’s debate. Shadow business secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey, Wigan MP Lisa Nandy and shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer are all still in the running. We’ll find out who takes the top job on April 4. A brief profile on each candidate: Rebecca Long-Bailey
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Labour leadership debate: Shadow business secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey
The 40-year-old shadow business secretary was the third candidate to make it on to the members’ ballot after securing backing from Unite, the Bakers, Food and Allied Workers Union, the Communication Workers Union and the Fire Brigades Union. Seen as a Corbyn loyalist, she was one of a new generation of MPs on the left of the party. She formed part of Mr Corbyn’s inner circle and represented Labour in an election TV debate last year. She is widely regarded as the preferred candidate of Mr Corbyn and his shadow chancellor, John McDonnell.
But critics of the current leadership have accused her of representing “continuity Corbyn”. In her candidate statement, Ms Long-Bailey said: “To realise collective aspiration, Labour must take on vested interests, not accommodate them. “Whether we live Blyth or Brixton, my vision of aspirational socialism and a democratic revolution will excite a movement for renewal.” Lisa Nandy
Labour leadership debate: Wigan MP Lisa Nandy
The 40-year-old MP for Wigan became the second candidate to secure her place on the members’ ballot when she won the backing of affiliate group Chinese for Labour, on top of being backed by the GMB union and the National Union of Mineworkers. On Friday, she also won the backing of the Jewish Labour Movement. Ms Nandy worked in the charitable sector before entering politics in 2010, and became one of a group of shadow ministers who resigned from Jeremy Corbyn’s frontbench after the Brexit referendum. She has become known for her support of smaller towns, saying the party needs to appeal to voters outside big cities if it is to win at the next election. In her candidate statement, Ms Nandy said: “In December, voters sent us a clear message – change, or die. “There are no more second chances for Labour.” Sir Keir Starmer
Labour leadership debate: Shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer


thedailyexpress--2020-02-18--Labour leadership latest POLL: Who won the Labour leadership debate last night? VOTE HERE

Sir Keir Starmer , Rebecca Long-Bailey and Lisa Nandy took part in the Channel 4 debate on Monday night , hosted by Krishnan Guru-Murthy .
Topics of debate included antisemitism , transgender rights , and how to win back voters after the worst electoral defeat for the Labour Party since 1935 .
So who do you think ‘ won ’ the debate ?
Televised debates of this nature don ’ t have official winners , and it ’ s up to the public to decide who emerged victorious .
We ’ re asking Express.co.uk readers to vote in our poll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the comment section at the bottom of the article on your thoughts - please note any comments which violate our policies will be reported and deleted .
You can scroll down to continue reading some highlights from the debate .
• Labour ’ s Barry Gardiner torn apart for lefty whining to rejoin EU Some highlights from the debate 1 .
No-one really wanted to criticise Corbyn Asked by an audience member if Labour will simply “ try Corbynism again ” , all candidates tried to deal with the question delicately .
Sir @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vilified in the press ” , and praised him for boosting the size of the party .
Ms Nandy struck the most critical tone , saying she laid the blame for the election defeat at the foot of the leader , saying voters did not believe Jeremy Corbyn was “ for ” them .
Mrs Long-Bailey avoided the issue altogether by claiming there was “ no such thing as Corbynism ” .
She said : “ There ’ s our Labour values .
If we believe in building more council homes , investing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ’ s not Corbynism.
” 2 .
Sir Keir wouldn ’ t explain why he didn ’ t sign the trans rights pledge Of the three candidates , Sir Keir was the only one not to have signed a pledge calling some organisations , such as Woman ’ s Place , “ trans-exclusionist hate groups ” and calling on Labour to expel “ transphobic ” members .
Sir Keir echoed his comments in the last TV debate , saying “ trans rights are human rights ” and points out he signed a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his position .
He said part of the problem with the debate on this issue is that it has been used as a “ political football ” and refused to be drawn further , saying he didn ’ t want to get to a place where the candidates were “ attacking each other publicly ” .
Ms Nandy explained her support for trans women being held in prisons designated for females , saying she backed that – but not holding people who are a risk to the safety of women in such areas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the debate to become a “ zero-sum game ” .
Mrs Long-Bailey calls on people to recognise the “ dehumanising ” process many trans people face in transitioning .
3 .
None of the candidates would decriminalise cannabis In a quick-fire question round , they were asked if they ’ d decriminalise cannabis .
All three said no , but with slight disclaimers .
Mrs Long-Bailey said : “ No , but I think we need to have a conversational nationally because the war on drugs isn ’ t working.
” .
Sir @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t immediately ” , while Ms Nandy said : “ No , let ’ s have a proper review.
” 4 .
Lisa Nandy would vote to abolish the monarchy Ms Nandy said she ’ d vote to abolish the monarchy a view at odds with the other two candidates .
All three , however , agreed it wasn ’ t a priority for the country right now .
Asked if they would vote to scrap the monarchy in the quick-fire round , Ms Nandy said : “ I ’ m a democrat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
“ But this is not the priority of the country.
” And Mrs Long-Bailey replied : “ I think we have got more important things to worry about .

Labour leadership: Long-Bailey grilled over her ‘own policy’
Sir Keir Starmer, Rebecca Long-Bailey and Lisa Nandy took part in the Channel 4 debate on Monday night, hosted by Krishnan Guru-Murthy. Topics of debate included antisemitism, transgender rights, and how to win back voters after the worst electoral defeat for the Labour Party since 1935.
Trending
So who do you think ‘won’ the debate? Televised debates of this nature don’t have official winners, and it’s up to the public to decide who emerged victorious. We’re asking Express.co.uk readers to vote in our poll below, and leave a comment in the comment section at the bottom of the article on your thoughts - please note any comments which violate our policies will be reported and deleted. You can scroll down to continue reading some highlights from the debate. THIS POLL IS NOW CLOSED. Head here for results
Labour leadership latest
READ MORE Labour’s Barry Gardiner torn apart for lefty whining to rejoin EU Some highlights from the debate 1. No-one really wanted to criticise Corbyn Asked by an audience member if Labour will simply “try Corbynism again”, all candidates tried to deal with the question delicately. Sir Keir said the outgoing leader was “vilified in the press”, and praised him for boosting the size of the party. Ms Nandy struck the most critical tone, saying she laid the blame for the election defeat at the foot of the leader, saying voters did not believe Jeremy Corbyn was “for” them. Mrs Long-Bailey avoided the issue altogether by claiming there was “no such thing as Corbynism”. She said: “There’s our Labour values. If we believe in building more council homes, investing in our futures…that’s socialism, that’s not Corbynism.”
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Labour leadership latest: Candidates took part in the Channel 4 debate on Monday night, hosted by Krishnan Guru-Murthy
Labour leadership latest: Lisa Nandy said she'd vote to abolish the monarchy
2. Sir Keir wouldn’t explain why he didn’t sign the trans rights pledge Of the three candidates, Sir Keir was the only one not to have signed a pledge calling some organisations, such as Woman’s Place, “trans-exclusionist hate groups” and calling on Labour to expel “transphobic” members. Sir Keir echoed his comments in the last TV debate, saying “trans rights are human rights” and points out he signed a separate pledge he felt more accurately reflected his position. He said part of the problem with the debate on this issue is that it has been used as a “political football” and refused to be drawn further, saying he didn’t want to get to a place where the candidates were “attacking each other publicly”. Ms Nandy explained her support for trans women being held in prisons designated for females, saying she backed that – but not holding people who are a risk to the safety of women in such areas. She said she does not want the debate to become a “zero-sum game”. Mrs Long-Bailey calls on people to recognise the “dehumanising” process many trans people face in transitioning.
READ MORE Meghan Markle should be Queen claims Labour leadership hopeful Nandy 3. None of the candidates would decriminalise cannabis In a quick-fire question round, they were asked if they’d decriminalise cannabis. All three said no, but with slight disclaimers. Mrs Long-Bailey said: “No, but I think we need to have a conversational nationally because the war on drugs isn’t working.”. Sir Keir said: “I wouldn’t immediately”, while Ms Nandy said: “No, let’s have a proper review.”
Labour leadership latest: Rebecca Long-Bailey said there's “no such thing as Corbynism”
4. Lisa Nandy would vote to abolish the monarchy Ms Nandy said she’d vote to abolish the monarchy a view at odds with the other two candidates. All three, however, agreed it wasn’t a priority for the country right now. Asked if they would vote to scrap the monarchy in the quick-fire round, Ms Nandy said: “I’m a democrat, so I would vote to scrap it. “But this is not the priority of the country.” Sir Keir said: “No, I wouldn’t. I think I’d downsize it.” And Mrs Long-Bailey replied: “I think we have got more important things to worry about. “I wouldn’t vote to abolish the monarchy.”
Labour leadership latest: Sir Keir said Jeremy Corbyn was “vilified in the press”


thedailyexpress--2020-02-18--EU trade deal with Canada on verge of COLLAPSE amid political infighting

The EU-Canada free trade agreement ( CETA ) was seen by many as a blueprint for the bloc ’ s post-Brexit trading relationship with the UK but Dutch MPs are expected to throw it out when they vote on whether to ratify the accord later today .
Such a move would spark yet another political crisis in Brussels with the model for Brexit trade talks in tatters just as the EU ’ s beleaguered bosses are bracing themselves for some brutal negotiations with the British counterparts .
CETA was approved in 2016 and came into provisional force in 2017 and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trade agreements would normally be taken for granted .
But the Netherlands ’ main opposition parties — from both left and right — are against the deal .
And prime minister Mark Rutte faces an uphill struggle to get majority for the agreement among his own four-party coalition government .
The Dutch would be the first EU country to reject CETA and could be responsible for killing it off .
And even if it scrapes through today the Netherlands ’ upper house is almost certain to block it later this month .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ panic with the EU ’ s Irish Trade Commissioner Phil Hogan insisting protection for agriculture and the right of governments to regulate were watertight .
In a letter sent to Dutch Trade Minister Sigrid Kaag he said : “ While implementation of EU border controls falls within the competence of the member states , I am fully convinced that all countries including the Netherlands , will efficiently enforce compliance of this legislation at its borders.
” Ms Kaag warned Dutch MPs rejecting the Canada deal would trigger an EU crisis as well as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
She told them : “ You will inflict enormous damage on the Netherlands and the EU .
“ We will not be able to commit ourselves as a country to a good , balanced treaty with a country like Canada that has the same standards and values as we do .

CETA protestors block entry to the European Parliament
The EU-Canada free trade agreement (CETA) was seen by many as a blueprint for the bloc’s post-Brexit trading relationship with the UK but Dutch MPs are expected to throw it out when they vote on whether to ratify the accord later today. Such a move would spark yet another political crisis in Brussels with the model for Brexit trade talks in tatters just as the EU’s beleaguered bosses are bracing themselves for some brutal negotiations with the British counterparts.
You will inflict enormous damage on the Netherlands and the EU Sigrid Kaag
CETA was approved in 2016 and came into provisional force in 2017 and a Dutch green light for EU free trade agreements would normally be taken for granted. But the Netherlands’ main opposition parties — from both left and right — are against the deal. And prime minister Mark Rutte faces an uphill struggle to get majority for the agreement among his own four-party coalition government.
Anti-CETA protestors take to the street of The Hague
The Dutch would be the first EU country to reject CETA and could be responsible for killing it off. And even if it scrapes through today the Netherlands’ upper house is almost certain to block it later this month. The prospect of failure has thrown Brussels into panic with the EU’s Irish Trade Commissioner Phil Hogan insisting protection for agriculture and the right of governments to regulate were watertight. In a letter sent to Dutch Trade Minister Sigrid Kaag he said: “While implementation of EU border controls falls within the competence of the member states, I am fully convinced that all countries including the Netherlands, will efficiently enforce compliance of this legislation at its borders.” READ MORE: Macron-backed EU-Canada trade deal is a ‘disaster’
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Dutch prime minister Marke Rutte faces a struggle to get CETA ratified
Dutch Trade Minister Sigrid Kaag warned rejecting the Canada deal would trigger an EU crisis
Ms Kaag warned Dutch MPs thinking of rejecting the Canada deal would trigger an EU crisis as well as destroying the model for Brexit trade talks. She told them: “You will inflict enormous damage on the Netherlands and the EU. “We will not be able to commit ourselves as a country to a good, balanced treaty with a country like Canada that has the same standards and values as we do.
Trending
Support for CETA in the Netherlands has collapsed


thedailyexpress--2020-02-18--Labour’s Barry Gardiner torn apart for lefty 'pointless whining' to rejoin EU – 'We left!'

Labour ’ s Barry Gardiner insisted Boris Johnson ’ s Canada-style deal will lead to reduced trade as it moves towards misalignment .
The Shadow Trade Secretary faced a brutal backlash for his opinion as Twitter users believe he was campaigning to rejoin the EU .
Speaking to BBC Newsnight , Mr Gardiner said : “ I want the UK to come out of this better off .
“ Given where we are I want negotiations that are going to be a win for the UK .
“ The first thing you ’ ve got to do is understand that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the reduction of barriers and the consequence the flows from that is increased trade which is economically beneficial .
“ When the Government says let 's just have a Canada trade deal- that 's false .
“ We 're starting from alignment and moving to disalignment , increased barriers , the logical consequence is reduced trade.
” READ MORE : BBC Newsnight host silenced as Lord brilliantly exposes why Critics of his appearance have said he is “ pointlessly whingeing ” .
One wrote on Twitter : “ Barry really is pushing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incline .
“ He really ought to desist from this perverse approach.
” Another added : “ Pointless whingeing .
We left .
Coming up with the ideal deal would be better.
” A third person wrote : “ No Barry you are pushing alignment with a rejoin agenda sort yourself out man !
” It comes as the Prime Minister plans to challenge Brussels to follow UK laws as part of any future trade deal as the Prime Minister turns the EU 's demands on their head .
Mr Johnson ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ respond to similar demands they have set out that would see the EU policing UK state aid rules , regulating UK taxes and permanently aligning Britain with its standards .
In a speech at the Universite Libre de Bruxelles , David Frost said : “ We bring to the negotiations not some clever tactical positioning but the fundamentals of what it means to be an independent country .
Brexit LIVE : David Frost laughs at EU who still 'miss point of Leave ' [ LIVE ] Brussels misery : Envoy brilliantly exposes how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is the reason for Brussels ’ Brexit tactics says STEPHEN POLLARD [ COMMENT ] “ It is central to our vision that we must have the ability to set laws that suit us – to claim the right that every other non-EU country in the world has .
“ So to think that we might accept EU supervision on so-called level playing field issues simply fails to see the point of what we are doing .
“ It isn ’ t a simple negotiating position which might move under pressure – it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That ’ s also why we will not extend the transition beyond the end of this year .
At that point we recover our political and economic independence in full – why would we want to postpone it ?
“ In short , we only want what other independent countries have .
”

Brexit: Gardiner says Canada style trade deal won't work
Labour’s Barry Gardiner insisted Boris Johnson’s Canada-style deal will lead to reduced trade as it moves towards misalignment. The Shadow Trade Secretary faced a brutal backlash for his opinion as Twitter users believe he was campaigning to rejoin the EU. Speaking to BBC Newsnight, Mr Gardiner said: “I want the UK to come out of this better off.
“Given where we are I want negotiations that are going to be a win for the UK. “The first thing you’ve got to do is understand that most trade negotiations are about increased alignment, the reduction of barriers and the consequence the flows from that is increased trade which is economically beneficial. “When the Government says let's just have a Canada trade deal- that's false. “We're starting from alignment and moving to disalignment, increased barriers, the logical consequence is reduced trade.” READ MORE: BBC Newsnight host silenced as Lord brilliantly exposes why
Labour’s Barry Gardiner insisted Boris Johnson’s Canada-style deal will lead to reduced trade
The Shadow Trade Secretary faced a brutal backlash for his opinion
Critics of his appearance have said he is “pointlessly whingeing”. One wrote on Twitter: “Barry really is pushing the Remainer/Rejoin bandwagon uphill - A steep incline. “He really ought to desist from this perverse approach.” Another added: “Pointless whingeing. We left. Coming up with the ideal deal would be better.”
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Boris Johnson plans to challenge Brussels to follow UK laws
Brexit: Bernd Lange discusses Canada-style trade agreement
A third person wrote: “No Barry you are pushing alignment with a rejoin agenda sort yourself out man!” It comes as the Prime Minister plans to challenge Brussels to follow UK laws as part of any future trade deal as the Prime Minister turns the EU's demands on their head. Mr Johnson’s chief negotiator challenged his European counterparts to respond to similar demands they have set out that would see the EU policing UK state aid rules, regulating UK taxes and permanently aligning Britain with its standards. In a speech at the Universite Libre de Bruxelles, David Frost said: “We bring to the negotiations not some clever tactical positioning but the fundamentals of what it means to be an independent country. DON'T MISS Brexit LIVE: David Frost laughs at EU who still 'miss point of Leave' [LIVE]
Brussels misery: Envoy brilliantly exposes how Brexit will leave UK [INSIGHT]
This is the reason for Brussels’ Brexit tactics says STEPHEN POLLARD [COMMENT]
Labour chart
Trending


thedailyexpress--2020-02-18--Pension tax relief to be SLASHED for high earners in £10billion tax grab

Boris Johnson will meet his new Chancellor Rishi Sunak for detailed talks about the forthcoming statement amid suggestions the pair are keen to relax spending rules .
The Treasury is understood to have drawn up plans to slash the rate of relief for higher earners from 40 percent to 20 percent in a move that would raise £10billion a year .
Higher earners get 40 percent tax relief on pension contributions , compared with 20 percent for lower earners but the proposed changes would mean everyone would get 20 percent pension tax relief .
A report in the Financial Times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entirely convinced by the plan , which is likely to spark fierce opposition among the ranks of traditional Tories if introduced in the budget .
There are growing concerns on the Tory benches over hints Mr Johnson wants next month ’ s budget to mount a tax raid on Middle England .
Then Prime Minister has already had to scrap plans for a so-called “ mansion tax ” based on a nationwide revaluation of homes because of a backlash from Conservative MPs and grassroots supporters .
He is said to have “ cooled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ property levy to squeeze more cash out of high-earners following the outcry .
Downing Street has refused to comment on plans for the budget .
But Mr Sunak posted a picture of himself in his new office on Twitter and said : “ Cracking on with preparations for my first budget on March 11 .
“ It will deliver on the promises we made to the British people – levelling up and unleashing the country ’ s potential.
” READ MORE : Brexit warning : Brussels ready to cut off UK from single @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an interview on the BBC1 Andrew Marr Show , pointed out that the Tory manifesto for the general election last December “ rules out specific tax rises ” .
Former Tory chancellor Lord Lamont said many Tory supporters were “ horrified ” by the idea of tax increases including the so-called mansion tax .
He said : “ The UK ’ s tax burden is already near a historically high level.
” He said he hoped Mr Sunak would “ find ways to make economies , ensure infrastructure projects are properly managed and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that at least we avoid penal tax increases.
” Former Tory Cabinet minister John Redwood has also warned that a mansion tax could “ destroy ” optimism and growth .
Mr Redwood said instead of tax rises the Government should be drawing up a list of targeted tax cuts , including stamp duty , to stimulate growth .
DO N'T MISS Brexiteer Cabinet will send chills through EU , says PATRICK O ’ FLYNN [ OPINION ] Real reason Boris Johnson pushed Sajid Javid out REVEALED [ INSIGHT ] Rishi Sunak new Chancellor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SPOTLIGHT ]

Rishi Sunak labelled a 'stooge' by Labour's John McDonnell
Boris Johnson will meet his new Chancellor Rishi Sunak for detailed talks about the forthcoming statement amid suggestions the pair are keen to relax spending rules. The Treasury is understood to have drawn up plans to slash the rate of relief for higher earners from 40 percent to 20 percent in a move that would raise £10billion a year.
The UK’s tax burden is already near a historically high level Lord Lamont
Higher earners get 40 percent tax relief on pension contributions, compared with 20 percent for lower earners but the proposed changes would mean everyone would get 20 percent pension tax relief. A report in the Financial Times suggested previous Chancellor Sajid Javid was not entirely convinced by the plan, which is likely to spark fierce opposition among the ranks of traditional Tories if introduced in the budget. There are growing concerns on the Tory benches over hints Mr Johnson wants next month’s budget to mount a tax raid on Middle England.
Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak are holding detailed budget talks
Then Prime Minister has already had to scrap plans for a so-called “mansion tax” based on a nationwide revaluation of homes because of a backlash from Conservative MPs and grassroots supporters. He is said to have “cooled” on the idea of a high-value property levy to squeeze more cash out of high-earners following the outcry. Downing Street has refused to comment on plans for the budget. But Mr Sunak posted a picture of himself in his new office on Twitter and said: “Cracking on with preparations for my first budget on March 11. “It will deliver on the promises we made to the British people – levelling up and unleashing the country’s potential.” READ MORE:Brexit warning: Brussels ready to cut off UK from single market
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Rishi Sunak said he was 'cracking on' with preparations for his first budget
Rishi Sunak replaced Sajid Javiod as Chancellor last week
Boris Johnson has already scrapped the so-called mansion tax after a Tory backlash
Transport Secretary Grant Shapps, in an interview on the BBC1 Andrew Marr Show, pointed out that the Tory manifesto for the general election last December “rules out specific tax rises”. Former Tory chancellor Lord Lamont said many Tory supporters were “horrified” by the idea of tax increases including the so-called mansion tax. He said: “The UK’s tax burden is already near a historically high level.”
Trending
He said he hoped Mr Sunak would “find ways to make economies, ensure infrastructure projects are properly managed and keep spending under sufficiently tight control so that at least we avoid penal tax increases.” Former Tory Cabinet minister John Redwood has also warned that a mansion tax could “destroy” optimism and growth. Mr Redwood said instead of tax rises the Government should be drawing up a list of targeted tax cuts, including stamp duty, to stimulate growth. DON'T MISS
Brexiteer Cabinet will send chills through EU, says PATRICK O’FLYNN[OPINION]
Real reason Boris Johnson pushed Sajid Javid out REVEALED[INSIGHT]
Rishi Sunak new Chancellor: Who is Rishi Sunak? [SPOTLIGHT]
Sajid Javid walked out of the Cabinet last week


thedailyexpress--2020-02-18--Boris Johnson will tell the EU to follow BRITISH laws after bloc demanded UK copy Brussels


thedailyexpress--2020-02-19--Britain’s new immigration rules: Priti Patel unveils ‘significant’ tight restrictions

A policy document published by the Home Office set out details of the new points-based immigration system due to come into force from January 1 when the UK ’ s transition out of EU rules and regulations ends .
“ We will reduce overall levels of migration , ” the document pledged .
Under the new system , foreign nationals applying to come to the UK for work purposes will have to meet a strict set of criteria .
“ We will deliver a system that works in the interests of the whole of the UK and prioritises the skills @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they came from , ” the document adds .
The system will assign points for specific skills , qualifications , salaries or professions and visas will only be awarded to those who gain enough points .
Minimum requirements will include having a job offer from an approved sponsor that suits their skill level and being able to speak English .
Applicants meeting those criteria will be awarded 50 of the 70 points needed to successfully apply for an online “ e-visa ” to come to the UK under the new system .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they will have to meet other criteria based on salary , seeking to work in a sector with a recognised labour shortage or a having a PhD .
A minimum general salary threshold of £25,600 will set , although different levels could be set in some specific sectors of the economy .
The proposals , to be put to Parliament in a new Immigration Bill later this year , are designed to close the general route into the country for unskilled or temporary workers .
“ We will not introduce a general low-skilled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to shift the focus of our economy away from a reliance on cheap labour from Europe and instead concentrate on investment in technology and automation .
Employers will need to adjust , ” said the document .
Officials estimate that around 70 percent of EU migrants allowed into the UK under current rules would be blocked under the new rules , although 3.2million EU citizens already living the UK will be allowed to remain under a settlement scheme .
Some key public services with labour shortages , particularly the NHS and social care @ @ @ @ @ @ @ block on unskilled migrants however .
A scheme for allowing unskilled seasonal workers from abroad to work in agriculture will be expanded to around 10,000 places a year under the move .
Britain ’ s immigration system has been “ distorted by European free movement rights ” for too long and has been “ failing to meet the needs of the British people , ” the document said .
“ From January 1 2021 , EU and non-EU citizens will be treated equally .
“ We will reduce overall levels of migration and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ highest skills and the greatest talents : scientists , engineers , academics and other highly-skilled workers.
” In a warning to employers to prepare for the change , the document added : “ We recognise that these proposals represent a significant change for employers in the UK and we will deliver a comprehensive programme of communication and engagement in the coming months.
” Officials say the proposal shows the Government have listened to the messages from the electorate at the 2016 EU referendum and 2019 general election demanding an end to the country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ labour from abroad .
The plans seek to reduce the overall level of annual net migration from the 226,000 recorded last year .
A new “ global talent scheme ” to attract high-skilled newcomers including scientists , engineers and academics will also be launched , the policy paper said .
Professor Alice Gast , President of Imperial College London , said : “ British science is global .
The new post-study work and Global Talent visas will help us to attract the world ’ s brightest students and researchers , wherever they come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ develop a coronavirus vaccine to clean energy , British science ’ s international collaborations drive innovation and excellence.
” The proposals will also overhaul the skills threshold for applicants to allow migrants qualified up the equivalent of A-levels rather than degrees , which is currently the minimum for skilled migrants from outside the EU .
Student visa routes will also be points-based and be opened up to EU citizens , ensuring talent from around the globe has access to the UK ’ s world-class universities .
Those wishing to study in the UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an offer from an approved educational institution , that they can support themselves financially and that they speak English .
EU citizens and other non-visa nationals will not require a visa to enter the UK when visiting for up to six months under the shake up .
But the use of national identity cards will be phased out for travel to the UK is to be phased out .
On a visit to Imperial College in London , Miss Patel said the new system would ensure that immigration policy is back under the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first time in decades '' .
She said : `` On January 1 2021 , we 'll be ending the free movement of labour from the EU , but excitingly this will be our new system – an immigration system that enables the Government to take back control of our own immigration policy for the first time in decades .
“ It will mean that we will have a global immigration system that does n't discriminate between EU and non-EU , and it 'll basically mean that the brightest and the best will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kingdom to bring their real talents which we 'll recognise through a points-based system . ''
She added : “ It is right that people should speak English before they come to our country , that they should have a sponsored route , whether it 's through employment or a sponsored route through an academic institution . ''
Diane Abbott , Labour ’ s shadow home secretary , said : “ This isn ’ t an ‘ Australian points-based system ’ , which is a meaningless Government soundbite .
“ It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need to have so many exemptions , for the NHS , for social care and many parts of the private sector , that it will be meaningless .
“ Just as important is what rights will be attached to these visas .
If families are split up because spouses and children are denied entry , this will be terrible for them and will deter many of the workers we need .
If they are all short-term visas only the most desperate workers will come , and will have the effect of creating a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will also be very difficult to attract the workers we need at all skill levels while the Tories ’ hostile environment is in place .
It needs to go .
“ Labour will be pressing hard on all these points as the legislation proceeds.
” Alp Mehmet , chairman of the pressure group Migration Watch UK , criticised the proposals for failing to include an overall limit on migration .
He said : `` These proposals suggest that the Government is not serious about taking control of immigration .
“ Not only will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opened up to new or greater competition from overseas workers in much poorer countries but employers will no longer have to look to find anyone at home before searching abroad .
`` The main safeguard of a suitable pay threshold will be significantly lowered , with an added loophole that so-called 'new entrants ' – who might be workers with a decade of experience – could be paid little more than the UK minimum wage .
`` With no cap on numbers coming via the main route from the outset , this is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 30 million people who were expecting this government finally to deliver on their long-standing promises to reduce immigration and show belief in young Brits , rather than giving in to the demands of bosses . ''
Mike Cherry , chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses , said : “ We see the benefits of a points-based model , so long as it ’ s one that ’ s easy to use and affordable for small businesses – almost all of which have no experience of using our current immigration system .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , sluggish economic growth and an ageing population , it ’ s critical that we get this right , particularly as the timeframes are so short . ''
What are the new immigration rules ?
Britain 's new immigration rules will mean that foreign nationals applying to work in the UK will be rated for their eligibility for a visa under a points scheme .
For their application to be successful , they must score a minimum of 70 points .
Having a job offer from an approved sponsor that is appropriate to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speak English at a level specified by the Home Office are mandatory requirements that score a total of 50 points .
If the job is in an occupation with a labour shortage such as engineering or information technology the applicant can score a further 20 points .
Possessing a university doctorate gives 10 points with the figure rising to 20 points if the qualification is in science , technology , engineering or mathematics .
An annual salary between £23,040 awards 10 points , rising to 20 points over £25,600 .
For example , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speak English with an £18,000-a-year job offer will score just 20 points and not be allowed to come to the UK to work .
A skilled plumber with good English and a job offer with a £24,000 annual salary would score 20 and would also be blocked .
A Primary school teacher with £26,000-a-year job offer and good English would score 70 points and would secure a visa to work in the UK .
A university lecturer with a maths PhD with an offer of a £40,000-a-year post would score 90 points and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we 're setting out the biggest overhaul of our immigration system in a generation .
Our firmer and fairer points-based system will enable the UK to flourish .
At the heart of our new system is the UK ’ s national interest and our ability as a country to decide who comes here .
It will be based on the skills people have and the contribution they can make , not where they come from - EU and non-EU citizens will be treated equally .
This means an end to free movement and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has left local workers feeling overlooked .
The Government has listened to the clear message from the 2016 referendum and the 2019 General Election and will end the reliance on cheap , low-skilled labour coming into the country .
This will help bring the overall numbers down .
People coming here to work under our UK points-based system will have to speak English and they will have to contribute each year to our NHS .
Our goal is to attract the brightest and best talent from across the globe , including engineers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It will help more of our companies to compete on the world stage and will advance the UK ’ s global reputation as a leader in science , technology and innovation .
Yes , some businesses will need to adapt and this may mean investing in the local workforce across England , Wales , Scotland and Northern Ireland , rather than looking to cheap labour overseas .
But this is , without doubt , a historic opportunity for our country .
We will take back control of our borders .
We will restore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be building a high-skill , high-wage economy , where no region is left behind .
This is what the British public in their millions rightly demand and this is what the Government is delivering .

Priti Patel announced that foreign nationals will need a job offer
Pledging to cut annual net migration, she urged employers to prepare for a “significant change” with rules designed to shift the economy away from relying on cheap labour from Europe towards a “high-wage, high skill, high productivity” future. Miss Patel said: “Today is a historic moment for the whole country. We’re ending free movement, taking back control of our borders and delivering on the people’s priorities by introducing a new UK points-based immigration system, which will bring overall migration numbers down. We will attract the brightest and the best from around the globe, boosting the economy and our communities, and unleash this country’s full potential.”
A policy document published by the Home Office set out details of the new points-based immigration system due to come into force from January 1 when the UK’s transition out of EU rules and regulations ends. “We will reduce overall levels of migration,” the document pledged. Under the new system, foreign nationals applying to come to the UK for work purposes will have to meet a strict set of criteria. “We will deliver a system that works in the interests of the whole of the UK and prioritises the skills a person has to offer not where they came from,” the document adds.
The system will assign points for specific skills, qualifications, salaries or professions and visas will only be awarded to those who gain enough points. Minimum requirements will include having a job offer from an approved sponsor that suits their skill level and being able to speak English. Applicants meeting those criteria will be awarded 50 of the 70 points needed to successfully apply for an online “e-visa” to come to the UK under the new system. But to get over the minimum points threshold they will have to meet other criteria based on salary, seeking to work in a sector with a recognised labour shortage or a having a PhD.
A minimum general salary threshold of £25,600 will set, although different levels could be set in some specific sectors of the economy. The proposals, to be put to Parliament in a new Immigration Bill later this year, are designed to close the general route into the country for unskilled or temporary workers. “We will not introduce a general low-skilled or temporary work route. We need to shift the focus of our economy away from a reliance on cheap labour from Europe and instead concentrate on investment in technology and automation. Employers will need to adjust,” said the document. Officials estimate that around 70 percent of EU migrants allowed into the UK under current rules would be blocked under the new rules, although 3.2million EU citizens already living the UK will be allowed to remain under a settlement scheme.
Some key public services with labour shortages, particularly the NHS and social care system, will be exempt from the block on unskilled migrants however. A scheme for allowing unskilled seasonal workers from abroad to work in agriculture will be expanded to around 10,000 places a year under the move. Britain’s immigration system has been “distorted by European free movement rights” for too long and has been “failing to meet the needs of the British people,” the document said. “From January 1 2021, EU and non-EU citizens will be treated equally.
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
“We will reduce overall levels of migration and give top priority to those with the highest skills and the greatest talents: scientists, engineers, academics and other highly-skilled workers.” In a warning to employers to prepare for the change, the document added: “We recognise that these proposals represent a significant change for employers in the UK and we will deliver a comprehensive programme of communication and engagement in the coming months.” Officials say the proposal shows the Government have listened to the messages from the electorate at the 2016 EU referendum and 2019 general election demanding an end to the country’s reliance on cheap, low-skilled labour from abroad. The plans seek to reduce the overall level of annual net migration from the 226,000 recorded last year.
A new “global talent scheme” to attract high-skilled newcomers including scientists, engineers and academics will also be launched, the policy paper said. Professor Alice Gast, President of Imperial College London, said: “British science is global. The new post-study work and Global Talent visas will help us to attract the world’s brightest students and researchers, wherever they come from. “From the race to develop a coronavirus vaccine to clean energy, British science’s international collaborations drive innovation and excellence.” The proposals will also overhaul the skills threshold for applicants to allow migrants qualified up the equivalent of A-levels rather than degrees, which is currently the minimum for skilled migrants from outside the EU.
Priti Patel is Secretary of State for the Home Department
Student visa routes will also be points-based and be opened up to EU citizens, ensuring talent from around the globe has access to the UK’s world-class universities. Those wishing to study in the UK will need to demonstrate that they have an offer from an approved educational institution, that they can support themselves financially and that they speak English. EU citizens and other non-visa nationals will not require a visa to enter the UK when visiting for up to six months under the shake up. But the use of national identity cards will be phased out for travel to the UK is to be phased out.
On a visit to Imperial College in London, Miss Patel said the new system would ensure that immigration policy is back under the control of the Government for the "first time in decades". She said: "On January 1 2021, we'll be ending the free movement of labour from the EU, but excitingly this will be our new system – an immigration system that enables the Government to take back control of our own immigration policy for the first time in decades. “It will mean that we will have a global immigration system that doesn't discriminate between EU and non-EU, and it'll basically mean that the brightest and the best will be able to come to the United Kingdom to bring their real talents which we'll recognise through a points-based system." She added: “It is right that people should speak English before they come to our country, that they should have a sponsored route, whether it's through employment or a sponsored route through an academic institution."
Diane Abbott, Labour’s shadow home secretary, is not happy with the new scheme
Diane Abbott, Labour’s shadow home secretary, said: “This isn’t an ‘Australian points-based system’, which is a meaningless Government soundbite. “It’s a salary threshold system, which will need to have so many exemptions, for the NHS, for social care and many parts of the private sector, that it will be meaningless. “Just as important is what rights will be attached to these visas. If families are split up because spouses and children are denied entry, this will be terrible for them and will deter many of the workers we need. If they are all short-term visas only the most desperate workers will come, and will have the effect of creating a two-tier workforce. “Ultimately, it will also be very difficult to attract the workers we need at all skill levels while the Tories’ hostile environment is in place. It needs to go.
“Labour will be pressing hard on all these points as the legislation proceeds.” Alp Mehmet, chairman of the pressure group Migration Watch UK, criticised the proposals for failing to include an overall limit on migration. He said: "These proposals suggest that the Government is not serious about taking control of immigration. “Not only will millions of UK workers see their jobs opened up to new or greater competition from overseas workers in much poorer countries but employers will no longer have to look to find anyone at home before searching abroad. "The main safeguard of a suitable pay threshold will be significantly lowered, with an added loophole that so-called 'new entrants' – who might be workers with a decade of experience – could be paid little more than the UK minimum wage.
"With no cap on numbers coming via the main route from the outset, this is a massive risk that will alarm the 30 million people who were expecting this government finally to deliver on their long-standing promises to reduce immigration and show belief in young Brits, rather than giving in to the demands of bosses." Mike Cherry, chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses, said: “We see the benefits of a points-based model, so long as it’s one that’s easy to use and affordable for small businesses – almost all of which have no experience of using our current immigration system. “Against a backdrop of stifling skills shortages, sluggish economic growth and an ageing population, it’s critical that we get this right, particularly as the timeframes are so short."
Trending
What are the new immigration rules? Britain's new immigration rules will mean that foreign nationals applying to work in the UK will be rated for their eligibility for a visa under a points scheme. For their application to be successful, they must score a minimum of 70 points. Having a job offer from an approved sponsor that is appropriate to their skill level and being able to speak English at a level specified by the Home Office are mandatory requirements that score a total of 50 points. If the job is in an occupation with a labour shortage such as engineering or information technology the applicant can score a further 20 points.
Possessing a university doctorate gives 10 points with the figure rising to 20 points if the qualification is in science, technology, engineering or mathematics. An annual salary between £23,040 awards 10 points, rising to 20 points over £25,600. For example, a builder’s labourer unable to speak English with an £18,000-a-year job offer will score just 20 points and not be allowed to come to the UK to work. A skilled plumber with good English and a job offer with a £24,000 annual salary would score 20 and would also be blocked. A Primary school teacher with £26,000-a-year job offer and good English would score 70 points and would secure a visa to work in the UK. A university lecturer with a maths PhD with an offer of a £40,000-a-year post would score 90 points and would also secure a visa.


thedailyexpress--2020-02-18--Labour leadership poll RESULTS: Sir Keir Starmer reigns despite ‘lightweight’ candidates

Labour leadership candidates clashed in a television debate on Monday night , as the three spoke out on Channel 4 @ @ @ @ @ Labour Party .
The candidates hoped to attract positive attention before the final leadership vote @ @ @ @ @ viewers were left unconvinced any of them were suitable to lead .
The Labour leader @ @ @ @ @ issues pertinent to the party earlier this week , including trans rights , antisemitism and @ @ @ @ @ all three candidates distanced themselves from Jeremy Corbyn , as none named him the best @ @ @ @ @ 50 years .
Only one of the three , Lisa Nandy , said they would @ @ @ @ @ .
Express.co.uk readers watching the showdown last night concluded one of the three emerged victorious @ @ @ @ @ were declared .

Labour leadership: Starmer says he’s trying to win ‘every vote’
Labour leadership candidates will soon be whittled down to their final two, as Lisa Nandy, Rebecca Long-Bailey and Sir Keir Starmer work to attract votes from the party's base in public and televised debates. Many people have already decided on their chosen leader, but thousands of Express.co.uk voters remain unconvinced by any.
Trending
The Labour leader candidates debated a range of issues pertinent to the party earlier this week, including trans rights, antisemitism and cannabis decriminalisation. Notably, all three candidates distanced themselves from Jeremy Corbyn, as none named him the best Labour leader of the last 50 years. Only one of the three, Lisa Nandy, said they would choose to scrap the monarchy. Express.co.uk readers watching the showdown last night concluded one of the three emerged victorious, although no official winners were declared.
Labour leadership poll results: Keir Starmer reigns after Channel 4 debate
Labour leadership poll results: Keir Starmer was named favourite to win after the debate
READ MORE Labour overhaul revealed: Who you could see in Keir Starmer’s cabinet Results from an earlier Express.co.uk poll found most people believed Sir Keir Starmer, currently a favourite to take the leadership bid this year, emerged victorious. Of the 4,197 voters, a total of 1,307 put their weight behind the Shadow Brexit Secretary. Close behind was Lisa Nandy, the MP for Wigan, with 1,136 votes. The least popular was “Corbyn continuity” candidate Rebecca Long-Bailey, with just 446 votes.
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Labour leadership poll results: Lisa Nandy said she would scrap the monarchy
READ MORE Labour BOMBSHELL: Could Labour see return of ED MILIBAND if Keir wins? Another reader added they “pitied” Labour for their offering, adding they would not “waste their time” voting for any. One long term Labour supporter said they felt there weren’t any viable options to vote for. They said: “Nobody won....they are all losers. The next election will prove it. “I am a lifelong Labour supporter from a northern heartland.”
Labour leadership poll results: Rebecca Long-Bailey just received 446 votes from Express readers


thedailyexpress--2020-02-18--France dangles no deal Brexit threat ahead of crunch talks – ‘Won’t accept at any cost!’

France ’ s European Affairs Minister Amélie de Montchalin on Monday kept the threat of a no deal Brexit on the negotiating table , as she warned that the EU27 wanted to reach a post-divorce deal with Britain before the end of the year – “ but not at any cost ” .
Mlle de Montchalin said in a Twitter post : “ [ The EU27 ] remain united on one inviolable principle : we do not want to reach an accord at any cost .
What we want is a good deal for Europeans.
” She was reacting to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s chief Brexit negotiator , Michel Barnier , in which he said the EU was “ preparing to negotiate an ambitious and lasting partnership [ with Britain ] that will take into account European interests ” .
Negotiations for a deal on future EU-UK relations are not scheduled to start until next month , but London and Brussels have already clashed over trade .
French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian on Sunday warned Britain to expect a bitter battle in trade talks with the EU , saying the two sides would likely “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Le Drian said at the Munich Security Conference : “ I think that on trade issues and the mechanism for future relations , which we are going to start on , we are going to rip each other apart .
“ But that is part of negotiations , everyone will defend their own interests.
” Britain made equally cutting remarks , saying on Monday that London would not be cowed into following EU rules in the future by talk of an economic war and was ready to trade with the bloc on basic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Boris Johnson ’ s Europe advisor , David Frost , told a lecture at a Brussels university : “ We are not frightened by suggestions there will be trade frictions .
“ We are not asking for anything special ; we are asking for a simple free trade agreement.
” He added : “ It is central to our vision that we must have the ability to set laws that suit us .
To think that we might accept EU supervision on so-called level playing field issues simply fails to see the point @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a free trade deal not be possible because of the bloc ’ s insistence that Britain aligns itself with EU rules , London is ready to trade with the EU27 according to the same basic international rules as Europe now follows with Australia , Mr Frost stressed .
The EU has retorted that it has no problem with that , but that the further removed those rules are , the less advantageous the trade deal .
Mr Frost ’ s speech came as a response to one delivered recently in London by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ von der Leyen , who urged Mr Johnson to agree to level playing field guarantees of fair competition based on ambitious environmental and labour standards .

Brexit: EU and UK trade talks will be ‘tough’ says expert
France’s European Affairs Minister Amélie de Montchalin on Monday kept the threat of a no deal Brexit on the negotiating table, as she warned that the EU27 wanted to reach a post-divorce deal with Britain before the end of the year – “but not at any cost”. Mlle de Montchalin said in a Twitter post: “[The EU27] remain united on one inviolable principle: we do not want to reach an accord at any cost. What we want is a good deal for Europeans.”
She was reacting to an earlier post by the bloc’s chief Brexit negotiator, Michel Barnier, in which he said the EU was “preparing to negotiate an ambitious and lasting partnership [with Britain] that will take into account European interests”. Negotiations for a deal on future EU-UK relations are not scheduled to start until next month, but London and Brussels have already clashed over trade. French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian on Sunday warned Britain to expect a bitter battle in trade talks with the EU, saying the two sides would likely “rip each other apart”. M Le Drian said at the Munich Security Conference: “I think that on trade issues and the mechanism for future relations, which we are going to start on, we are going to rip each other apart.
France’s European Affairs Minister Amélie de Montchalin
“But that is part of negotiations, everyone will defend their own interests.” Britain made equally cutting remarks, saying on Monday that London would not be cowed into following EU rules in the future by talk of an economic war and was ready to trade with the bloc on basic international terms if necessary. Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Europe advisor, David Frost, told a lecture at a Brussels university: “We are not frightened by suggestions there will be trade frictions. “We are not asking for anything special; we are asking for a simple free trade agreement.”
He added: “It is central to our vision that we must have the ability to set laws that suit us. To think that we might accept EU supervision on so-called level playing field issues simply fails to see the point of what we are doing.” Should a free trade deal not be possible because of the bloc’s insistence that Britain aligns itself with EU rules, London is ready to trade with the EU27 according to the same basic international rules as Europe now follows with Australia, Mr Frost stressed. The EU has retorted that it has no problem with that, but that the further removed those rules are, the less advantageous the trade deal. Mr Frost’s speech came as a response to one delivered recently in London by the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, who urged Mr Johnson to agree to level playing field guarantees of fair competition based on ambitious environmental and labour standards.
SUBSCRIBE Invalid email We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Trending