welovetrump--2020-02-05--INVESTIGATION: Does 18 US Code 2071 Suggests Pelosi Could Lose Her Office As Penalty For Destroying

INVESTIGATION: Does 18 US Code 2071 Suggests Pelosi Could Lose Her Office As Penalty For Destroying Official Documents?


welovetrump--2020-02-05--DOJ Backs Down From Jail Time In Flynn Case

Fox News confirms the positive turn in the case : The Department of Justice backed down from seeking jail time Wednesday and made clear that prosecutors would accept mere probation in the case of former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn -- a shift that comes as Flynn moves to withdraw his guilty plea leveraging accusations of government misconduct .
Just weeks ago , the DOJ said it would seek up to six months of prison time for the retired Army lieutenant general who spent just 24 days at his post in the Trump administration .
Represented by an aggressive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moved to withdraw his guilty plea for making false statements to two FBI agents in 2017 -- statements that eventually wrapped him up in former Special Counsel Robert Mueller 's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election .
`` In truth , I never lied , '' Flynn wrote in a new supplemental motion to withdraw his guilty plea filed Wednesday .
`` My guilty plea has rankled me throughout this process , and while I allowed myself to succumb to the threats from the government to save my family , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ really happened . ''
Flynn also blamed his former lawyers for providing him with bad information that led him to plead guilty .
`` One of the ways a person becomes a 3-star general is by being a good soldier , taking orders , being part of a team , and trusting the people who provide information and support , '' Flynn wrote .
`` Lori and I trusted Mr. Kelner and Mr. Anthony to guide us through the most stressful experience in our lives , in a completely incomprehensible situation .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ While the DOJ 's stance is technically the same -- it is seeking a sentence of zero-to-six months -- the department 's new filing makes clear that it would not oppose a sentence imposing zero jail time if that is what the judge decides .
In support of a potential sentence of probation , the government notes two `` similarly-situated '' high-ranking officials who committed similar crimes and got probation .
Former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger , who stole classified information then lied about it to investigators , and Gen. David Petraeus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ documents he should not have had , both were sentenced to probation .
It was not clear why the Justice Department appeared to soften its position , though prosecutors did suggest Flynn deserves credit for his decades-long military service .

The good news keeps coming my friends!
Last night we had the historic State of the Union address, where President Trump assured the nation that “the State of this Union is STRONG!”
Today we have the expected final vote to dismiss impeachment altogether!
And now more good news to share….
It looks like the government is backing off the Mike Flynn case big time!
It used to be that they were demanding multiple years in jail.
The report out today is that they may now accept no jail time and only probation.


welovetrump--2020-02-05--Newt Gingrich Says Nancy Pelosi Should Be Censured For Ripping Up Trump Speech

Here 's more from The Hill : Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich ( R-Ga. ) on Wednesday called on current @ @ @ @ @ D-Calif. ) to be censured for her actions in ripping up a copy of President @ @ @ @ @ Union address after his speech Tuesday night .
Pelosi has been a hot topic of @ @ @ @ @ online after tearing up the copy of Trump 's remarks .
Gingrich tweeted that her @ @ @ @ @ or cute ” and called Pelosi “ childish.
” “ As Speaker of the House @ @ @ @ @ Unions by a President of the other party I am disgusted and insulted by the @ @ @ @ @ Pelosi tearing up the speech , ” Gingrich tweeted to his 2.1 million followers .
@ @ @ @ @ clever or cute her childishness insults our American traditions -should be censured .
”

Here's more from The Hill:
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) on Wednesday called on current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to be censured for her actions in ripping up a copy of President Trump's State of the Union address after his speech Tuesday night.
Pelosi has been a hot topic of debate on cable news and online after tearing up the copy of Trump's remarks.
Gingrich tweeted that her actions were not “clever or cute” and called Pelosi “childish.”
“As Speaker of the House for four State of the Unions by a President of the other party I am disgusted and insulted by the viciously partisan action of Nancy Pelosi tearing up the speech,” Gingrich tweeted to his 2.1 million followers. “She isn’t clever or cute her childishness insults our American traditions -should be censured.”


welovetrump--2020-02-05--President Trump’s Full SOTU Address; Pence Reaction

In case you missed it , I ’ ve got the full State of the Union Address from President Trump @ @ @ @ @ This was one for the history books my friends .
I ’ d love to @ @ @ @ @

In case you missed it, I’ve got the full State of the Union Address from President Trump for you right here.
This was one for the history books my friends.
WOW!
I’d love to hear what you thought.


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Don Jr. Says Nancy Pelosi Broke The Law (18 US Code 2071), Should Be Removed From Office As Penalty

The preliminary question is whether the copy of the speech meets the definition of a `` ... record , proceeding , map , book , paper , document , or other thing ... '' .
The next question is whether it was `` ... filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States , or in any public office , or with any judicial or public officer of the United States ... '' .
Don Jr. is right about one thing .
If the tables were turned , you can bet the Democrats would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could find .
And let 's be honest ... .this Code Section and application to Nancy Pelosi ripping up the copy of the speech , is stronger than any actual claim made by Democrats in the impeachment procedings .
That really says a lot .
But would charging Nancy Pelosi with this really hold up ?
My guess is no .
And as any good prosecutor would tell you , the last thing you want to do is over-charge a crime and not be able to prove it .
My suspicion is that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an ORIGINAL record of some office of the government .
Think of Birth Certificates , Deeds , Death Records , Titles , stuff like that .
Probably a bit of a stretch , but that 's just my opinion .
With multiple other copies existing , plus the video recording of the speech , it 's unlikely any true history was lost or altered .

You may have noticed some articles and Tweets floating around today suggesting that Nancy Pelosi could be in for a serious penalty after ripping up President Trump’s speech last night.
Those penalties are prison time and loss of office.
No one would be happier than me if Pelosi was REMOVED FROM OFFICE, but….is it true?
Let’s take a look.
The idea seems to have been started by this Tweet from Carl Higbie:


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Nadler Says The House Will Likely Subpoena John Bolton Next

Meanwhile , Politico reports Pelosi says she has no `` immediate '' plans to do so : Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday signaled Democrats have no immediate plans to summon former national security adviser John Bolton for testimony — but she made clear the House would not abandon its investigations into President Donald Trump despite him being acquitted in his impeachment trial .
Pelosi pointed to a slew of ongoing legal battles against Trump — including to obtain his tax returns and a long-ignored subpoena related to Robert Mueller ’ s probe — that are still moving through the courts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no plans right now ” to begin a fight over Bolton .
“ We will continue to do our oversight to protect and defend the Constitution , ” Pelosi told reporters at her weekly news conference .
“ We have some cases in court now , ” Pelosi said .
“ If there are others we see as an opportunity , we ’ ll make a judgment at that time , but we have no plans right now.
” Bolton ’ s fate has been one of the biggest lingering questions for Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trial this week .
New revelations from Bolton ’ s upcoming book tying Trump closer to the Ukraine scandal threatened to upend the trial , but Senate Republicans defeated a Democratic push for witnesses and the GOP stood firmly behind Trump .
Most Democrats say they want to hear what Bolton has to say .
But some are also wary of launching a new chapter of investigations just as they ’ ve closed one and believe they must tread carefully as the November election approaches .
Even if Democrats do nothing , Bolton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ released on March 17 unless the White House blocks it — potentially dragging the caucus back to the subject after the Senate trial .
House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler told reporters on Wednesday that Democrats “ will likely ” subpoena Bolton .
But other top Democrats have been more cautious in their answers .
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said this week that the House ’ s investigative panels will evaluate whether “ there is still relevant information that needs to be uncovered.
” “ The committees may well want to hear from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked about a potential Bolton subpoena .
“ But they ’ re going to make that decision .
We ’ re going to have discussions about it .
”

Here's more, from the NY Mag:
On the very day that the U.S. Senate is expected to acquit President Trump in his impeachment trial, House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler said investigations into Trump’s pressure campaign against Ukraine will continue. And a key part of those investigations will involve issuing a subpoena to Trump’s former national security adviser John Bolton, Nadler told reporters.
Democrats have long wanted to hear from Bolton regarding the Ukraine saga, but their interest increased last week when the New York Timesreported on claims Bolton makes in a forthcoming book. In the book, Bolton writes that Trump explicitly told him that congressionally appropriated military aid to Ukraine was being held up to force an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden.
READ MORE: Are These Anti-Trumpers Demon-Possessed? [WARNING: graphic content]
Bolton’s claim is important, but not because it proves anything about Trump’s Ukraine scheme. That has already been established by Trump’s public statements, the admission of his chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, and the testimony of many other administration officials. Bolton, however, is the first person to claim that Trump flatly told him that the aid was being withheld in exchange for the investigations. His testimony would blow up the central argument made by Trump’s defense.
“Not a single witness testified that the president himself said that there was any connection between any investigations and security assistance, a presidential meeting or anything else,” Trump lawyer Mike Purpura said last week.


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Trump Wins Iowa Youth Straw Poll With Over Two Times The Votes Of Closest Democrat!

President Trump is shattering every mold , breaking every stereotype .
Proving he can do what the so-called “ experts @ @ @ @ @ be done .
And now you can add another group to the list : the @ @ @ @ @ long been thought that young people vote Democrat , and they ’ d never go @ @ @ @ @ Certainly they ’ d never support Donald Trump , after all the indoctrination in the @ @ @ @ @ youth are a lot more perceptive than we give them credit for .
And they @ @ @ @ @ see one .
They know a witch hunt when they see one .
And they @ @ @ @ @ America when they see one .
The results of a new Iowa Youth Straw are @ @ @ @ @ a runaway landslide for President Donald John Trump !

President Trump is shattering every mold, breaking every stereotype.
Proving he can do what the so-called “experts” say can’t be done.
He’s winning black voters.
He’s winning women voters.
He’s winning life-long Democrats.
And now you can add another group to the list: the Youth.
It’s long been thought that young people vote Democrat, and they’d never go for a stodgy Republican.
Certainly they’d never support Donald Trump, after all the indoctrination in the schools and media.
Except……except something funny is happening.
Our youth are a lot more perceptive than we give them credit for.
And they know a leader when they see one.
They know a witch hunt when they see one.
And they know a guy who loves America when they see one.
The results of a new Iowa Youth Straw are in and it’s a runaway landslide for President Donald John Trump!
Take a look:


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Angry Democrats Call Into C-Span And Say They’re Voting Trump After The State of the Union Address

Here 's more , from the Gateway Pundit : President Trump delivered his third State of the Union Address Tuesday night .
The President honored one of our oldest living Tuskegee airmen , mourned the families of Rocky Jones and Kayla Mueller and reunited a service member with his beautiful wife and children .
First Lady Melania awarded conservative radio icon Rush Limbaugh with the Presidential Medal of Freedom .
Bitter Democrats sat on their butts for record black unemployment , for record jobs numbers , for record wage gains and near the end of President Trump ’ s speech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ Hand of Almighty God ” for blessing this great nation .
In an appalling lack of respect for the House , the country and the President , Speaker Pelosi ripped up President Trump ’ s SOTU speech .
READ MORE : Why Do All Liberals Have The Same Bug-Eyed Look ?
“ I ’ ve been a Democrat for 77 years and what I ’ ve seen tonight of the Democrat party , I am changing my mind.. ” one caller said .
Another angry Democrat caller ripped Pelosi and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dems , who voted for Hillary in 2016 , will NEVER vote Dem again .
“ I ’ m a Democrat as well , but no longer will I vote Democrat .
I think it ’ s outrageous that they sat there when all these good things are happening to our country and how much we love our country and they look like they hated our country , ” the caller said .
“ And Nancy Pelosi sitting up there the whole time with a disgusting look on her face .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrat again and I ’ m sick of it !
And my whole family feels the same way…all former Democrats — we all voted for Hillary last time and therefore NEVER EVER will we ever vote Democrat again.
” “ Our Democrat party has been stolen from us by a bunch of Communists , ” the angry caller added .
Another woman from Washington called in and said , “ I am literally disgusted with Pelosi and the Democrats ’ behavior — the way she teared up the speech behind [ Trump ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I ’ ve gone Independent and I ’ m leaning GOP now .
”

Here's more, from the Gateway Pundit:
President Trump delivered his third State of the Union Address Tuesday night.
The President honored one of our oldest living Tuskegee airmen, mourned the families of Rocky Jones and Kayla Mueller and reunited a service member with his beautiful wife and children.
First Lady Melania awarded conservative radio icon Rush Limbaugh with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Bitter Democrats sat on their butts for record black unemployment, for record jobs numbers, for record wage gains and near the end of President Trump’s speech they even sat when President Trump thanked the “Hand of Almighty God” for blessing this great nation.
In an appalling lack of respect for the House, the country and the President, Speaker Pelosi ripped up President Trump’s SOTU speech.
READ MORE: Why Do All Liberals Have The Same Bug-Eyed Look?
Pelosi’s stunt cost her Democrat voters.
“I’ve been a Democrat for 77 years and what I’ve seen tonight of the Democrat party, I am changing my mind..” one caller said.
Another angry Democrat caller ripped Pelosi and the Dems and said her entire family of Dems, who voted for Hillary in 2016, will NEVER vote Dem again.
“I’m a Democrat as well, but no longer will I vote Democrat. I think it’s outrageous that they sat there when all these good things are happening to our country and how much we love our country and they look like they hated our country,” the caller said. “And Nancy Pelosi sitting up there the whole time with a disgusting look on her face. It’s outrageous and I will never vote Democrat again and I’m sick of it! And my whole family feels the same way…all former Democrats — we all voted for Hillary last time and therefore NEVER EVER will we ever vote Democrat again.”
“Our Democrat party has been stolen from us by a bunch of Communists,” the angry caller added.
Another woman from Washington called in and said, “I am literally disgusted with Pelosi and the Democrats’ behavior — the way she teared up the speech behind [Trump]. I was a registered Democrat, I’ve gone Independent and I’m leaning GOP now.”


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Republicans Vow To EXPUNGE Impeachment From The Books If They Take Back The House

Here 's more , from the NY Post : As the Senate is set to vote Wednesday on the removal from office of President Trump — with acquittal all but assured — Republicans are already plotting to expunge his impeachment if they retake the House .
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi may have taunted that impeachment “ will last forever , ” but GOP Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy , in line to be speaker if Republicans regain the majority in the November election , doesn ’ t agree .
“ This is the fastest , weakest , most political impeachment in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Wednesday .
“ I don ’ t think it should stay on the books.
” If McCarthy ( R-Calif. ) does indeed take the gavel from Pelosi ( D-Calif. ) in 2021 , he will hold immense power to pass legislation — and a vote on expungement almost certainly would yield party-line support .
McCarthy and other Republicans say that investigating how Democrats — led by Pelosi , Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff ( D-Calif. ) and Judiciary Committee Chair Jerrold Nadler ( D-NY ) — pursued their impeachment of Trump could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expungement effort .
“ I think [ if ] we take the majority , some of the key priorities for us are infrastructure , lowering prescription drugs and others .
But I think when you look at what the Democrats have done , I also think we have to get to the bottom of it , ” McCarthy said .
READ MORE : Why Do So Many Politicians and Celebrities Have Black Eyes ?
“ There ’ s still an 18th transcript that was never released about the inspector general .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there was 179 pages , did Adam Schiff know the whistleblower ?
Did he meet with the whistleblower ?
I think a lot of questions are raised about whether that individual , Adam Schiff , was a fact witness.
” Republicans need to flip 18 seats to retake the House and have the majority needed to pass such a measure along party lines .
With Trump on the ballot in November , they are expecting an enthusiasm boost among voters .
“ We feel very , very confident that come November [ voters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decision and Speaker Pelosi ’ s term as speaker of the House will not go beyond this year , ” said House Republican Conference Chair Rep. Liz Cheney ( R-Wyo . )
on Wednesday .
The notion of expungement is likely to please Trump , who has been stung by being the third president in history to be impeached .
His defense team told senators it was reasonable for Trump to ask Ukraine to investigate Democrats including former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter , who scored a cushy board job @ @ @ @ @ @ @ father led the Obama administration ’ s push to rid Ukraine of corruption .
Trump denies stalling nearly $ 400 million in foreign aid as leverage .
Unlike other impeached presidents , Trump is poised to potentially serve another full term , increasing the political value of expungement for him and for GOP lawmakers .
Backers of the notion point to the House voting in 1837 to expunge a censure of President Andrew Jackson , though some legal experts believe expungement would be only symbolic .
Rep. Louie Gohmert ( R-Texas ) told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doing it in a later Congress , ” citing the Jackson censure vote .
Gohmert said he ’ s thought a lot about the possibility and he ’ s convinced Republicans would do it .
“ The president is there and I think ultimately with the things that are going to be coming out in the months ahead , it will be all the more appropriate .
More and more people will see that , ” Gohmert said .
“ So then I think by next year it will be an appropriate thing @ @ @ @ @ @

Here's more, from the NY Post:
As the Senate is set to vote Wednesday on the removal from office of President Trump — with acquittal all but assured — Republicans are already plotting to expunge his impeachment if they retake the House.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi may have taunted that impeachment “will last forever,” but GOP Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, in line to be speaker if Republicans regain the majority in the November election, doesn’t agree.
“This is the fastest, weakest, most political impeachment in history,” McCarthy told The Post on Wednesday. “I don’t think it should stay on the books.”
If McCarthy (R-Calif.) does indeed take the gavel from Pelosi (D-Calif.) in 2021, he will hold immense power to pass legislation — and a vote on expungement almost certainly would yield party-line support.
McCarthy and other Republicans say that investigating how Democrats — led by Pelosi, Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Judiciary Committee Chair Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) — pursued their impeachment of Trump could provide the factual basis to underpin an expungement effort.
“I think [if] we take the majority, some of the key priorities for us are infrastructure, lowering prescription drugs and others. But I think when you look at what the Democrats have done, I also think we have to get to the bottom of it,” McCarthy said.
READ MORE: Why Do So Many Politicians and Celebrities Have Black Eyes?
“There’s still an 18th transcript that was never released about the inspector general. It’s interesting to know, in there there was 179 pages, did Adam Schiff know the whistleblower? Did he meet with the whistleblower? I think a lot of questions are raised about whether that individual, Adam Schiff, was a fact witness.”
Republicans need to flip 18 seats to retake the House and have the majority needed to pass such a measure along party lines. With Trump on the ballot in November, they are expecting an enthusiasm boost among voters.
“We feel very, very confident that come November [voters] are going to make the right decision and Speaker Pelosi’s term as speaker of the House will not go beyond this year,” said House Republican Conference Chair Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) on Wednesday.
The notion of expungement is likely to please Trump, who has been stung by being the third president in history to be impeached. His defense team told senators it was reasonable for Trump to ask Ukraine to investigate Democrats including former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who scored a cushy board job at a Ukrainian energy company while his father led the Obama administration’s push to rid Ukraine of corruption. Trump denies stalling nearly $400 million in foreign aid as leverage.
Unlike other impeached presidents, Trump is poised to potentially serve another full term, increasing the political value of expungement for him and for GOP lawmakers.
Backers of the notion point to the House voting in 1837 to expunge a censure of President Andrew Jackson, though some legal experts believe expungement would be only symbolic.
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) told The Post “there is precedent for doing it in a later Congress,” citing the Jackson censure vote. Gohmert said he’s thought a lot about the possibility and he’s convinced Republicans would do it.
“The president is there and I think ultimately with the things that are going to be coming out in the months ahead, it will be all the more appropriate. More and more people will see that,” Gohmert said. “So then I think by next year it will be an appropriate thing to file and do.”


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Trump Victory Speech: “I’ve Beaten Them All Of My Life, And I’ll Beat Them Again If I Have To”

President Trump just gave one of the most incredible speeches I have ever seen from him .
He actually said it wasn ’ t a speech , wasn ’ t a press conference….it was just a celebration , and boy was he right !
It was part speech , part press conference , part celebration , part roast , part toast and something so much more , something intangible that made the moment special .
I really can ’ t summarize the whole thing for you because I couldn ’ t do it justice but I urge you to watch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it will be well worth your time .
I think the parts that were roasts were some of my favorite moments .
When special to and about Steve Scalise , President Trump recounted the harrowing story of the shooting during the baseball practice .
He told the story of him and Melania visiting Scalise in the hospital and being told by the doctors he would not survive .
He then recounted the story of the shooting and how two police officers came flying in from outfield to save the day .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serious and heavy , President Trump then shifted gears and said : “ And Steve , you really look good today !
You look better now than before .
I mean , before you weren ’ t such a good looking guy , but now you really look good !
” Only Trump could manage to pull that off and have the whole room laughing !
In another moment , he spoke directly about the impeachment and what would happen next .
He suspected that they will continue to attack him by any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ I ’ ve beaten them my whole life , and I ’ ll do it again if I have to.
” The will and the resolve of this man is unreal .
I truly do believe it is supernatural .

President Trump just gave one of the most incredible speeches I have ever seen from him.
He actually said it wasn’t a speech, wasn’t a press conference….it was just a celebration, and boy was he right!
It was part speech, part press conference, part celebration, part roast, part toast and something so much more, something intangible that made the moment special.
I really can’t summarize the whole thing for you because I couldn’t do it justice but I urge you to watch the video below.
I promise you, it will be well worth your time.
I think the parts that were roasts were some of my favorite moments.
When special to and about Steve Scalise, President Trump recounted the harrowing story of the shooting during the baseball practice.
He told the story of him and Melania visiting Scalise in the hospital and being told by the doctors he would not survive.
He then recounted the story of the shooting and how two police officers came flying in from outfield to save the day.
As if sensing the moment had become very serious and heavy, President Trump then shifted gears and said: “And Steve, you really look good today! You look better now than before. I mean, before you weren’t such a good looking guy, but now you really look good!”
Only Trump could manage to pull that off and have the whole room laughing!
In another moment, he spoke directly about the impeachment and what would happen next.
He suspected that they will continue to attack him by any means possible, but then he said “I’ve beaten them my whole life, and I’ll do it again if I have to.”
The will and the resolve of this man is unreal.
I truly do believe it is supernatural.


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Incredibly Inspirational Trump Video:  Never Give Up!

This is so good !
I ’ ve watched it three times in a row now .
Trust me , @ @ @ @ @ want to bookmark this and watch it often .
❤ Can you imagine how often @ @ @ @ @ give up ?
After all the Fake News , all the Fake Witch Hunts , @ @ @ @ @ he never gave up .
He stands on truth and justice !
Please let this @ @ @ @ @ life and live the same way .

This is so good!
I’ve watched it three times in a row now.
Every single line is quotable!
“We don’t worship government, we worship God.”
“Never, ever, ever give up!”
Trust me, you’re going to want to bookmark this and watch it often. ❤
Can you imagine how often President Trump probably wanted to give up?
After all the Fake News, all the Fake Witch Hunts, all the Fake Impeaching…
But he never gave up.
He stands strong!
He fights back!
He stands on truth and justice!
Please let this inspire you in your own life and live the same way.
Enjoy:


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Q Video – The Plan to Save the World

Q Video – The Plan to Save the World

Friends…you need to see this .
More importantly , your friends and family need to see this .
All voters need to see this !
As “ Deplorables ” we have a certain view of the world .
That view includes things like understanding how the Deep State pulls the strings behind the scene , how many politicians and famous people are deeply corrupted , and on and on .
Have you ever struggled to share that view with others ?
Because there are just so many moving pieces and it ’ s hard to pull it all together ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that puts the whole story together in 13 minutes .
And it will get your adrenaline pumping !
Because the good guys are about to strike back .
The plan has been laid and the good guys in government and in the military are ready to restore our country .
Many people don ’ t know what to make of Q , but many recent posts have shown whoever it is has a deep connection deep inside the White House .
READ MORE > > Is This Donald Trump In The Bible ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ it like crazy :

Friends…you need to see this.
More importantly, your friends and family need to see this.
All voters need to see this!
As “Deplorables” we have a certain view of the world.
That view includes things like understanding how the Deep State pulls the strings behind the scene, how many politicians and famous people are deeply corrupted, and on and on.
Have you ever struggled to share that view with others?
Because there are just so many moving pieces and it’s hard to pull it all together?
We’ve got you covered.
We just came across this AMAZING video that puts the whole story together in 13 minutes.
It’s brilliant.
And it will get your adrenaline pumping!
Because the good guys are about to strike back. The plan has been laid and the good guys in government and in the military are ready to restore our country.
Many people don’t know what to make of Q, but many recent posts have shown whoever it is has a deep connection deep inside the White House.
And they’re the white knights.
READ MORE >> Is This Donald Trump In The Bible?
Please enjoy this video and please SHARE it like crazy:
They fear the truth.
So here’s a backup from Bitchute if that gets taken down:
And here is one more backup.
One last backup, from Rumble:
https://rumble.com/embed/v8epol/?pub=2oodx


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Trump with Pelosi On Stage: I Don’t Like People Who Say ‘I pray for you’ When They Know That’s Not S

Trump with Pelosi On Stage: I Don’t Like People Who Say ‘I pray for you’ When They Know That’s Not So

President Trump proudly displayed two newspapers with blaring “ Acquitted ” headlines Thursday morning , waving them before a National Prayer Breakfast audience in his first appearance since he was declared not guilty in his Senate impeachment trial .
The president brandished the headlines mere feet from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , D-Calif. , after both arrived at the breakfast .
President Donald Trump holds up a newspaper with the headline that reads `` Trump acquitted '' during the 68th annual National Prayer Breakfast , at the Washington Hilton , Thursday , Feb. 6 , 2020 , in Washington .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ first picked up a USA Today newspaper and presented it before the audience .
He then put it down and picked up a copy of Thursday ’ s Washington Post , which had a similar headline .
He later addressed the audience and took some not-so-subtle swipes at Pelosi once more .
`` I do n't like people who use their faith as justification for doing what they know is wrong , nor do I like people who say ' I pray for you ' when you know that is not so , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said during the impeachment process that she and fellow Democrats were `` prayerful '' and that she prays for the president .
Trump also called impeachment a `` terrible ordeal by some very dishonest and corrupt people . ''
For Trump , the moment was payback not only for impeachment but her conduct at the close of Tuesday 's State of the Union address .
Following his speech , Pelosi tore up the pages of the speech in full view of the cameras , shocking lawmakers .
The Senate , meanwhile , on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impeachment against him—abuse of power and obstruction of Congress—following a weeks-long trial .

President Trump took a well-deserved victory lap at a Prayer Breakfast this morning.
But I think it was much more than that.
I think he was putting the entire Deep State cabal on notice that he’s ready to fight back.
They all got to take their best shot at him for over 3 years and nothing stuck.
And I think he just told them the tables are about to be turned.
With Pelosi in attendance just five seats down, he said this:


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Now Rep. Gaetz Says He’s Filing Charges Against Pelosi For Destroying Official Document

Our friends over at the Western Journal had more on the story : House Speaker Nancy Pelosi generated plenty of headlines and video coverage when she dramatically ripped up a written copy of President Donald Trump ’ s State of the Union address on Tuesday .
But , according to Rep. Matt Gaetz , she might have done something more .
The Florida firebrand says the grandstanding gesture might have violated the law .
“ I will be filing charges against Nancy Pelosi in the House Ethics Committee , ” Gaetz said Wednesday on Fox News ’ “ The Ingraham @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Representatives , she embarrassed our country and she destroyed official records , ” Gaetz said .
“ The law does not allow the speaker of the House to destroy the records of the House .
“ And the rules of the House do not permit some little temper tantrum just because you don ’ t like what the president of the United States says.
” Gaetz put his complaint in writing , too .
In a letter he posted to Twitter on Wednesday , he asked House Ethics Committee Chairman Rep. Theodore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ranking Republican member Rep. Kenny Marchant of Texas , to open an investigation into the speaker ’ s conduct .
He also requested “ a criminal referral for her potential violation of 18 U.S.C .
2071 ( Concealment , removal , or mutilation of documents ) following President Trump ’ s recent State of the Union address … Her unseemly behavior certainly warrants censure.
” The letter quoted the part of the law stating that anyone who “ willfully and unlawfully conceals , removes , mutilates , obliterates , falsifies or destroys ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s been “ filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States , or in any public office , or with any judicial or public officer of the United States ” — shall , under the law , “ be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years or both ; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.
” “ There is no question that Speaker Pelosi ‘ mutilated , obliterated , or destroyed ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ address provided to her at the beginning of the evening , ” Gaetz wrote .
“ The video evidence is clear and abundant , and the Speaker herself told reporters that she tore up this document because it was the ‘ courteous thing to do given the alternatives.
’ ” Given the fact that the ethics committee is controlled by Pelosi ’ s Democrats , it might seem unlikely that Gaetz will get it to agree to go along with his call to seek prosecution of Pelosi by the Department of Justice .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ are questions about whether Pelosi ripping up a copy of Trump ’ s speech would qualify as destroying a “ formal record.
” “ I heard murmurs that , ‘ this is cute , but it ’ s not really going to work , ’ ” she said .
But the action makes it clear that Pelosi ’ s made-for-TV moment isn ’ t going to be forgotten anytime soon on Capitol Hill .
Gaetz and Rep. Lee Zeldin , a New York Republican who joined Gaetz on “ The Ingraham Angle , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republican Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina , who yelled “ You lie !
” during a 2009 speech by then-President Barack Obama to a joint session of Congress .

Our friends over at the Western Journal had more on the story:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi generated plenty of headlines and video coverage when she dramatically ripped up a written copy of President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address on Tuesday.
But, according to Rep. Matt Gaetz, she might have done something more.
The Florida firebrand says the grandstanding gesture might have violated the law.
“I will be filing charges against Nancy Pelosi in the House Ethics Committee,” Gaetz said Wednesday on Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle.”
“She disgraced the House of Representatives, she embarrassed our country and she destroyed official records,” Gaetz said. “The law does not allow the speaker of the House to destroy the records of the House.
“And the rules of the House do not permit some little temper tantrum just because you don’t like what the president of the United States says.”
Gaetz put his complaint in writing, too. In a letter he posted to Twitter on Wednesday, he asked House Ethics Committee Chairman Rep. Theodore Deutch, a Florida Democrat, and ranking Republican member Rep. Kenny Marchant of Texas, to open an investigation into the speaker’s conduct.
He also requested “a criminal referral for her potential violation of 18 U.S.C. 2071 (Concealment, removal, or mutilation of documents) following President Trump’s recent State of the Union address … Her unseemly behavior certainly warrants censure.”
The letter quoted the part of the law stating that anyone who “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys” a government record — one that’s been “filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States” — shall, under the law, “be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”
“There is no question that Speaker Pelosi ‘mutilated, obliterated, or destroyed’ the copy of the President’s address provided to her at the beginning of the evening,” Gaetz wrote. “The video evidence is clear and abundant, and the Speaker herself told reporters that she tore up this document because it was the ‘courteous thing to do given the alternatives.’”
Given the fact that the ethics committee is controlled by Pelosi’s Democrats, it might seem unlikely that Gaetz will get it to agree to go along with his call to seek prosecution of Pelosi by the Department of Justice.
And as Ingraham pointed out, there are questions about whether Pelosi ripping up a copy of Trump’s speech would qualify as destroying a “formal record.”
“I heard murmurs that, ‘this is cute, but it’s not really going to work,’” she said.
But the action makes it clear that Pelosi’s made-for-TV moment isn’t going to be forgotten anytime soon on Capitol Hill.
Gaetz and Rep. Lee Zeldin, a New York Republican who joined Gaetz on “The Ingraham Angle,” compared the action to that of Republican Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina, who yelled “You lie!” during a 2009 speech by then-President Barack Obama to a joint session of Congress.


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Trump at Prayer Breakfast: “I don’t like people who use their faith as justification for doing what

Trump at Prayer Breakfast: “I don’t like people who use their faith as justification for doing what they know is wrong.”


welovetrump--2020-02-06--Results Show Trump Wins Undecided Voters After SOTU Address

Could this week get any better for the President ?
On top of the Senate ’ s acquittal and the @ @ @ @ @ , results from focus groups now show undecided voters back Trump after his State of @ @ @ @ @ note Democrats , this President won ’ t be easily stopped !

Could this week get any better for the President?
On top of the Senate’s acquittal and the Democrats’ disastrous Iowa caucuses, results from focus groups now show undecided voters back Trump after his State of the Union address.
Take note Democrats, this President won’t be easily stopped!


welovetrump--2020-02-07--Laura Ingraham Calls For Mitt Romney to Resign, Says She Might Run Against Him!

The popular Fox News host Laura Ingraham has come out swinging .
Backlash has continued to grow ever since Romney broke ranks with his fellow GOP colleagues and voted to convict President Trump .
Ingraham had a lot to say when she weighed in .
According to Fox News : “ If he were up for reelection this year , the people of Utah would have their own payback against him because they were defrauded by Romney .
For when he had to choose , he chose [ Charles ] Schumer and Kamala [ Harris ] over common sense and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If you ’ re one of Romney ’ s constituents in Utah , you ’ re out of luck .
If you ’ re a business in need of a regulation reexamined , don ’ t bother calling his office .
He has no power anymore.
” Ingraham brought up Romney ’ s previous presidential runs saying , “ we thought you ’ d be better for America and the way you repay millions of people , the millions who did vote for you in 2012 is to throw in with the very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ goals , who hate us .
And by the way , who still hate you.
” “ Like all the other bitter ‘ Never Trumpers ’ , he ’ d rather see the entire American economy go down the drain than give Trump a victory , ” Ingraham said .
Now , that ’ s a race we ’ d love to see !
Ingraham has been exposing Romeny for several weeks .
She is an equal-opportunity truth-teller , calling out liars both left and right .
Watch as she tears into Nancy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ segment !
Just last night , Ingraham had a guest from Utah who was calling on Republican colleagues to censure Mitt Romney .
The would-be failed-presidential candidate ’ s career ended long before he voted to convict Trump .
Just last week , he was dis-invited from the largest gathering of conservatives in the country .
How quickly the stars can fall .
We shouldn ’ t be surprised that America doesn ’ t want back-stabbers as leaders or role models .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
Run, Laura, Run!
The popular Fox News host Laura Ingraham has come out swinging. Backlash has continued to grow ever since Romney broke ranks with his fellow GOP colleagues and voted to convict President Trump.
Ingraham had a lot to say when she weighed in. According to Fox News:
“If he were up for reelection this year, the people of Utah would have their own payback against him because they were defrauded by Romney. For when he had to choose, he chose [Charles] Schumer and Kamala [Harris] over common sense and conservatism,” Ingraham said. “If you’re one of Romney’s constituents in Utah, you’re out of luck. If you’re a business in need of a regulation reexamined, don’t bother calling his office. He has no power anymore.” Trending: Updated Clinton Kill List: The List of People “Who Mysteriously Died” After Being Associates With The Clintons Ingraham brought up Romney’s previous presidential runs saying, “we thought you’d be better for America and the way you repay millions of people, the millions who did vote for you in 2012 is to throw in with the very people who don’t share our goals, who hate us. And by the way, who still hate you.” “Like all the other bitter ‘Never Trumpers’, he’d rather see the entire American economy go down the drain than give Trump a victory,” Ingraham said.
Ouch!
Now, that’s a race we’d love to see!
Ingraham has been exposing Romeny for several weeks. She is an equal-opportunity truth-teller, calling out liars both left and right.
Watch as she tears into Nancy Pelosi and Mitt Romney in the same segment!
Just last night, Ingraham had a guest from Utah who was calling on Republican colleagues to censure Mitt Romney.
He joins us tonight on the #IngrahamAngle! “Utah state lawmaker files resolution to censure Romney over impeachment vote” https://t.co/UvanniIZXH — Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) February 7, 2020
The would-be failed-presidential candidate’s career ended long before he voted to convict Trump. Just last week, he was dis-invited from the largest gathering of conservatives in the country.
***Support We Love Trump and Mike Lindell plus get up to 66% off -- use promo code WLT at MyPillow.com*** After breaking ranks with Senate Republicans and calling for additional testimony from witnesses in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, Utah Senator Mitt Romney has been “formally NOT invited” to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) expected to take place in February 2020 in Fort Washington, Maryland. American Conservative Union (ACU) Chairman Matt Schlapp made the announcement on Twitter Friday.
BREAKING: The "extreme conservative" and Junior Senator from the great state of Utah, @SenatorRomney is formally NOT invited to #CPAC2020. pic.twitter.com/f35tYy73V1 — Matt Schlapp (@mschlapp) January 31, 2020
How quickly the stars can fall.
We shouldn’t be surprised that America doesn’t want back-stabbers as leaders or role models.
Better luck next time, Mittens.


welovetrump--2020-02-07--Anti-Trump Witness, Alexander Vindman, Has Been Fired

What goes around comes around .
Anti-Trump impeachment witness Alexander Vindman and his brother were seen being escorted out of the White House .
For those who didn ’ t watch the impeachment snoozefest , Alexander Vindman was accused of being coached by Adam Schiff during his testimony .
Rep. Devin Nunes claims that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff was coaching Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman , the director of European affairs at the National Security Council ( NSC ) , as he told House committees that he “ did not think it was proper ” for President Trump to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former VP Joe Biden during a July 25 phone call .
“ I have never in my life seen anything like what happened today , during the testimony of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman , ” Nunes told Fox News ’ “ Hannity.
” “ It was unprecedented , ” Nunes continued .
“ I mean , they ’ ve been bad at most of these depositions , but to interrupt us continually to coach the witness , to decide… what we ’ re going to be able to ask the witness.
” Schiff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can be found here : Representative Jordan had the opportunity to question Vindman during the hearings .
Jordan discovered that Vindman spoke with an attorney after the phone call and instead of expressing his concern through the appropriate chain of command .
Even more alarmingly , the New York Times revealed that Ukraine sought Vindman out to counter Trump ’ s foreign policy .
That raises the question : why would a foreign nation think that Vindman would be willing to help their goals ?
Naturally , the media and the Democrats will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But let ’ s be honest , this is just another campaign promise that has been kept .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
2 views
What goes around comes around.
Anti-Trump impeachment witness Alexander Vindman and his brother were seen being escorted out of the White House.
News — Lt. Col. Vindman was just escorted out of the White House by security and told his services were no longer needed. — Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) February 7, 2020
For those who didn’t watch the impeachment snoozefest, Alexander Vindman was accused of being coached by Adam Schiff during his testimony.
Zero Hedge reports:
Rep. Devin Nunes claims that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff was coaching Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, the director of European affairs at the National Security Council (NSC), as he told House committees that he “did not think it was proper” for President Trump to ask Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky to investigate former VP Joe Biden during a July 25 phone call. “I have never in my life seen anything like what happened today, during the testimony of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman,” Nunes told Fox News’ “Hannity.” “It was unprecedented,” Nunes continued. “I mean, they’ve been bad at most of these depositions, but to interrupt us continually to coach the witness, to decide… what we’re going to be able to ask the witness.”
Schiff’s “questioning” of Vindman can be found here:
Representative Jordan had the opportunity to question Vindman during the hearings. Jordan discovered that Vindman spoke with an attorney after the phone call and instead of expressing his concern through the appropriate chain of command.
CNN had more on the firing:
President Donald Trump fired two key impeachment witnesses Friday, dismissing Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the top Ukraine expert at the National Security Council, and US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland.
An adviser to Trump said the firings of the major impeachment witnesses was meant to send a message that siding against the President will not be tolerated. “Flushing out the pipes,” the adviser told CNN. “It was necessary.” Vindman was pushed out of his role Friday months earlier than expected, according to a statement from his attorney. Vindman was not slated to leave until July, but had been telling colleagues in recent weeks he would likely leave soon. Sondland said in a statement Friday that he is being recalled from his post. “I was advised today that the President intends to recall me effective immediately as United States Ambassador to the European Union,” Sondland said. “I am grateful to President Trump for having given me the opportunity to serve, to Secretary Pompeo for his consistent support, and to the exceptional and dedicated professionals at the U.S. Mission to the European Union. I am proud of our accomplishments. Our work here has been the highlight of my career.” The dismissals appear to be retribution for Vindman and Sondland’s explosive testimonies to the House impeachment probe late last year, both of which were done under subpoena. The duo gave some of the most damning testimony to House impeachment investigators during last fall’s public hearings and quickly became targets for Trump’s supporters, both inside and outside of government. The firings come two days after the Senate voted to acquit Trump on two articles of impeachment in votes that were largely along party lines. Trump had continued to fume privately about Vindman’s testimony during the impeachment inquiry and foreshadowed his dismissal earlier Friday. “Well, I’m not happy with him,” Trump said. “You think I’m supposed to be happy with him? I’m not.” Even more alarmingly, the New York Times revealed that Ukraine sought Vindman out to counter Trump’s foreign policy.
That raises the question: why would a foreign nation think that Vindman would be willing to help their goals?
The NYT reported:
His heritage gave Colonel Vindman, who is fluent in both Ukrainian and Russian, unique insight into Mr. Trump’s pressure campaign; on numerous occasions, Ukrainian officials sought him out for advice about how to deal with Mr. Giuliani.
Naturally, the media and the Democrats will accuse Trump of extracting “revenge.”
But let’s be honest, this is just another campaign promise that has been kept.
Drain the swamp!


welovetrump--2020-02-07--Republicans Press Forward Investigation Into Hunter Biden; Dept. of Treasury Is Reportedly Cooperati

Republicans Press Forward Investigation Into Hunter Biden; Dept. of Treasury Is Reportedly Cooperating

Republicans are moving forward with investigations into Hunter Biden .
Now that the impeachment hoax is over , Republican Senators @ @ @ @ @ and Ron Johnson ( Wis. ) have asked for the traven records of Joe Biden @ @ @ @ @ part of their request , the senators specifically want to know what sort of security @ @ @ @ @ his father served as vice president , and a list of all dates and places @ @ @ @ @ protective detail .
They specifically want to know if he traveled on Air Force One @ @ @ @ @ the presidential and vice presidential aircraft , or on another government aircraft and whether additional @ @ @ @ @ each trip .
It turns out that the Treasury Department is cooperating with the investigation @

Make no mistake folks, things are happening behind the scenes!
According to new reports, Republicans are moving forward with investigations into Hunter Biden and the wheels of justice are turning.
Now that the impeachment hoax is over, Republican Senators Chuck Grassley (Iowa) and Ron Johnson (Wis.) have asked for the traven records of Joe Biden’s son.
The Hill reports:
As part of their request, the senators specifically want to know what sort of security detail Hunter Biden received while his father served as vice president, and a list of all dates and places Hunter Biden traveled with a protective detail. They specifically want to know if he traveled on Air Force One or Air Force Two, the presidential and vice presidential aircraft, or on another government aircraft and whether additional family members were present for each trip.
It turns out that the Treasury Department is even cooperating with the investigation!


welovetrump--2020-02-07--Appeals Court Sides with Trump In 3-0 Decision As Democrats Lose Emoluments Case

And here 's more on the breaking story , from The Hill : A federal appeals court in Washington , D.C. , threw out a lawsuit accusing President Trump of illegally profiting off his private businesses while in office , ruling that the Democratic lawmakers who brought the suit lack legal standing .
A three-judge panel on the D.C .
Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday did not rule on whether the president was violating the Constitution by profiting off foreign governments ' spending at his hotels .
The judges unanimously said in a brief 12-page decision that the dispute @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has no place in the court system .
`` The Members can , and likely will , continue to use their weighty voices to make their case to the American people , their colleagues in the Congress and the President himself , all of whom are free to engage that argument as they see fit , '' the judges wrote .
`` But we will not—indeed we can not —participate in this debate . ''
Two of the three judges were appointed by Republican presidents and the other by a Democrat .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , who unlike every recent president , has refused to relinquish control over his business assets by placing them in a blind trust .
And it comes just two days after the president 's acquittal in his three-week long impeachment trial over accusations that he had sought help from the Ukrainian government in investigating former Vice President Joe Biden , a potential rival in the 2020 presidential race .
Trump learned of the decision just before speaking with reporters at the White House Friday morning as he prepared to leave for a speech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ came out a few minutes ago , so I 'll be reading it on the helicopter but it was a total win , '' he said .
`` It was another phony case and we won it three to nothing .
We won it unanimously . ''

And here's more on the breaking story, from The Hill:
A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., threw out a lawsuit accusing President Trump of illegally profiting off his private businesses while in office, ruling that the Democratic lawmakers who brought the suit lack legal standing.
A three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday did not rule on whether the president was violating the Constitution by profiting off foreign governments' spending at his hotels. The judges unanimously said in a brief 12-page decision that the dispute centering around the Constitution's emoluments clauses has no place in the court system.
"The Members can, and likely will, continue to use their weighty voices to make their case to the American people, their colleagues in the Congress and the President himself, all of whom are free to engage that argument as they see fit," the judges wrote. "But we will not—indeed we cannot—participate in this debate."
Two of the three judges were appointed by Republican presidents and the other by a Democrat.
The decision is a major win for Trump, who unlike every recent president, has refused to relinquish control over his business assets by placing them in a blind trust. And it comes just two days after the president's acquittal in his three-week long impeachment trial over accusations that he had sought help from the Ukrainian government in investigating former Vice President Joe Biden, a potential rival in the 2020 presidential race.
Trump learned of the decision just before speaking with reporters at the White House Friday morning as he prepared to leave for a speech in North Carolina.
"It just came out a few minutes ago, so I'll be reading it on the helicopter but it was a total win," he said. "It was another phony case and we won it three to nothing. We won it unanimously."


welovetrump--2020-02-07--Jim Jordan Given Big Promotion To Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee

News broke today that Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows would both be receiving big promotions to powerful positions .
Two @ @ @ @ @ biggest allies on Capitol Hill have been selected for top GOP roles on a pair @ @ @ @ @ GOP Steering Committee met Thursday and recommended that Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan serve as ranking @ @ @ @ @ Judiciary Committee effective March 12 , and that North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows take Jordan @ @ @ @ @ Committee ranking member for the remainder of this Congress , Fox News has confirmed .
@ @ @ @ @ to ratify the recommendation , which was first reported by The Hill .
Current House @ @ @ @ @ , R-Ga. , will step down from that post as he pursues a Senate seat @ @ @ @ @ among Trump ’ s strongest defenders during the impeachment proceedings and served on his legal @ @ @

Congratulations Jim!
News broke today that Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows would both be receiving big promotions to powerful positions.
From Fox News:
Two of President Trump’s biggest allies on Capitol Hill have been selected for top GOP roles on a pair of committees.
The House GOP Steering Committee met Thursday and recommended that Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan serve as ranking member of the powerful House Judiciary Committee effective March 12, and that North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows take Jordan’s spot as Oversight Committee ranking member for the remainder of this Congress, Fox News has confirmed.
The full conference now has to ratify the recommendation, which was first reported by The Hill. Current House Judiciary Committee Chairman Doug Collins, R-Ga., will step down from that post as he pursues a Senate seat.
Jordan and Meadows were among Trump’s strongest defenders during the impeachment proceedings and served on his legal defense team.


welovetrump--2020-02-07--Appeals Court Sides with Trump Giving Major Win In Emoluments Case

Another big win for President Trump this week !
The D.C. Court of Appeals completely tossed the Democrats ’ case @ @ @ @ @ the Emolments Clause .
The vote was 3-0 in the President ’ s favor – @ @ @ @ @ and the Democrats must be feeling pretty disheartened right now with all these Trump wins @ @ @ @ @ what ’ s being said right now :

Another big win for President Trump this week!
The D.C. Court of Appeals completely tossed the Democrats’ case alleging that Trump is violating the Emolments Clause.
The vote was 3-0 in the President’s favor – not even close!
Nancy and the Democrats must be feeling pretty disheartened right now with all these Trump wins stacking up.
Check out what’s being said right now:


welovetrump--2020-02-07--Stacey Abrams Says She’ll Be President By 2040, If Not Sooner

Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams said today that she had long seen 2028 as the `` earliest '' she could see herself running for president but later tweeted `` 2020 is definitely on the table '' as she weighs her next political move .
Abrams , in an interview at SXSW in Austin , Texas , referred to a quote from her book where she said she keeps a spreadsheet to document her goals .
`` In the spreadsheet with all the jobs I wanted to do , 2028 would be the earliest I would be ready to stand for president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I thought necessary to be effective in that job , '' Abrams said .
After the interview , Abrams insisted in a tweet that the comment did not mean she has ruled out running for president next year .
`` In # LeadFromTheOutside , I explore how to be intentional about plans , but flexible enough to adapt .
20 years ago , I never thought I ’ d be ready to run for POTUS before 2028 .
But life comes at you fast , '' Abrams tweeted .
`` 2020 is definitely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former campaign manager , Lauren Groh-Wargo , also tweeted after the interview that the quote referring to the old spreadsheet did not mean Abrams was ruling out running for president next year .
Abrams remarks `` were in reference to her years-old spreadsheet , not her current considerations .
She is taking a look at all options on the table in 2020 and beyond , '' Groh-Wargo tweeted .

Do you remember Stacey Abrams?
You might recall she ran for Governor of Georgia in 2018 and was defeated.
Well, I’m not sure what planet she’s living on, but in a new interview she now thinks she’ll be President by 2040, if not much sooner!
Memo to Stacey: you might want to win a single state before you try to win all 50!
Check out what she Tweeted:


welovetrump--2020-02-07--Stacy Abrams Says She’ll Be President By 2040, If Not Sooner

Stacey Abrams , the former Georgia gubernatorial nominee whose name has been floated as a possible Democratic vice presidential pick , predicted in an interview published Friday that she will become president within the next two decades .
After Abrams said she “ absolutely ” believed Americans would send a black woman to the Oval Office in the next 20 years , journalist Clare Malone of FiveThirtyEight asked : “ Do you think they ’ ll elect you ?
” “ Yes .
I do , ” Abrams responded .
“ That ’ s my plan .
And I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Abrams , a former Georgia state representative , adds to the political intrigue and professional speculation surrounding one of the Democratic Party ’ s most rapidly ascending stars .
Abrams , who lost a close 2018 race to be governor of Georgia , has been mentioned by several White House hopefuls as a potential running mate .
Prior to her declaration Friday that she will seek the presidency before 2040 , Abrams said in a March interview that 2028 “ would be the earliest I would be ready to stand for president .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , she wrote that “ 2020 is definitely on the table ” — a run she has since ruled out .
In August , Abrams announced she would not enter the current Democratic primary and would instead focus her efforts on combating voter suppression and boosting participation in the 2020 census .
But she also said in an interview that same month that she would be “ honored to be considered by any nominee ” as a vice presidential contender .

Stacey Abrams, the former Georgia gubernatorial nominee whose name has been floated as a possible Democratic vice presidential pick, predicted in an interview published Friday that she will become president within the next two decades.
After Abrams said she “absolutely” believed Americans would send a black woman to the Oval Office in the next 20 years, journalist Clare Malone of FiveThirtyEight asked: “Do you think they’ll elect you?”
“Yes. I do,” Abrams responded. “That’s my plan. And I’m very pragmatic.”
The declaration from Abrams, a former Georgia state representative, adds to the political intrigue and professional speculation surrounding one of the Democratic Party’s most rapidly ascending stars. Abrams, who lost a close 2018 race to be governor of Georgia, has been mentioned by several White House hopefuls as a potential running mate.
Prior to her declaration Friday that she will seek the presidency before 2040, Abrams said in a March interview that 2028 “would be the earliest I would be ready to stand for president." In a subsequent tweet, however, she wrote that “2020 is definitely on the table” — a run she has since ruled out.
In August, Abrams announced she would not enter the current Democratic primary and would instead focus her efforts on combating voter suppression and boosting participation in the 2020 census. But she also said in an interview that same month that she would be “honored to be considered by any nominee” as a vice presidential contender.


welovetrump--2020-02-07--Mayor Pete Faces Backlash Over Failure To Say He’s Against Infanticide

If you want to talk about radical , this is the article for you .
Mayor Pete has branded himself in the public eye as a “ Mayor from the Heartland ” .
A guy who is relatively milktoast and inoffensive .
Yet the more America learns , the more people are beginning to question just how radical his policies actually are .
The issue in question dates back to an old statement where he said some people don ’ t consider a baby to be a person until it takes its first breath .
And he used the Bible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s more on that , from our friends over at the Daily Caller : Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg suggested Friday that unborn babies can be aborted up until they draw their first breath , saying parts of the Bible mention “ how life begins with breath.
” The South Bend , Indiana , mayor spoke with “ The Breakfast Club ” on Friday morning about his comprehensive Douglass Plan , his thoughts on whether America is ready for a gay president , and whether black voters should vote for him .
Buttigieg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ beginning with breath , and suggested this would be one way to determine when life began in relation to abortion debates .
He said Republicans hold everyone in line with doctrine about abortion .
” … which is obviously a tough issue for a lot of people to think through morally , ” Buttigieg said .
“ Then again , there ’ s a lot of parts of the Bible that talk about how life begins with breath , and so even that is something that we can interpret differently.
” “ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the kind of cosmic question of how life begins , most Americans can get on board with the idea of , alright , I might draw the line here , you might draw the line there , but the most important thing is the person who should be drawing the line is the woman making the decision , ” the South Bend mayor continued .
This is not the first time Buttigieg has spoken out about his views on abortion .
He criticized pro-life Republicans on Aug. 21 at a town hall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unplanned parenthood.
” “ They are so busy attacking Planned Parenthood , ” Buttigieg said .
“ I ’ d like to know what they think of unplanned parenthood.
” Buttigieg also defended a woman ’ s right to late-term abortions at a Fox News town hall in May .
“ I think the dialogue has gotten so caught up on where you draw the line , that we ’ ve gotten away from the fundamental question of who gets to draw the line , and I trust women to draw the line @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Buttigieg told Fox News ’ Chris Wallace .
Wallace then asked if he would be “ okay with a woman , well into the third trimester , deciding to abort her pregnancy.
” “ The bottom line is , as horrible as that choice is , that woman , that family , may seek spiritual guidance , they may seek medical guidance , but that decision isn ’ t going to be made any better , medically or morally , because the government is dictating how that decision should be made , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to put himself in the shoes of the woman in that situation .

If you want to talk about radical, this is the article for you.
Mayor Pete has branded himself in the public eye as a “Mayor from the Heartland”.
A guy who is relatively milktoast and inoffensive.
Yet the more America learns, the more people are beginning to question just how radical his policies actually are.
The issue in question dates back to an old statement where he said some people don’t consider a baby to be a person until it takes its first breath.
And he used the Bible to support that position.
Here’s more on that, from our friends over at the Daily Caller:


welovetrump--2020-02-09--Vindman “an Operative with an Agenda,” According to Navy SEAL Who Killed Bin Laden

War heroes slammed Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman , a National Security Council official who testified Tuesday in the impeachment @ @ @ @ @ hearing .
Vindman , who served as director of Eurasia at the NSC , testified @ @ @ @ @ July 25 phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenksy , he went @ @ @ @ @ report his concerns about the call .
Specifically , Vindman testified that he thought it @ @ @ @ @ up investigations into allegations of whether Ukraine interfered in the 2016 elections as well as @ @ @ @ @ s seat on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas company whose executive was being @ @ @ @ @ testified that he did not have concerns whether it was illegal or a crime , @ @ @ @ @ morally wrong .
He also testified that he advised the Ukrainians not to get involved @ @ @ @ @ Vindman ’ s testimony rubbed some military veterans the wrong way , including prominent war @ @

More from Breitbart:
War heroes slammed Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council official who testified Tuesday in the impeachment inquiry’s third public hearing. Vindman, who served as director of Eurasia at the NSC, testified that after listening to the July 25 phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenksy, he went to the NSC lawyer to report his concerns about the call.
Specifically, Vindman testified that he thought it was wrong that Trump brought up investigations into allegations of whether Ukraine interfered in the 2016 elections as well as allegations surrounding Hunter Biden’s seat on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas company whose executive was being investigated for corruption.
Vindman testified that he did not have concerns whether it was illegal or a crime, but said he found it morally wrong. He also testified that he advised the Ukrainians not to get involved in U.S. domestic politics.
Vindman’s testimony rubbed some military veterans the wrong way, including prominent war heroes.


welovetrump--2020-02-09--Trump Haters Want Him Impeached Again For Sondland Firing

Guess what , snowflakes : When you serve at the pleasure of the President , you can be fired at the displeasure of the president .
Trump has long wanted to fire Sondland , but has displayed great restraint and refused to do so during the impeachment process .
Sondland , who donated $ 1 million to Trump ’ s inaugural committee , fell out of favor with the president after his testimony in November alleging that the president pursued an improper “ quid pro quo ” tying military aid for Ukraine to political investigations .
Trump has long wanted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doing so during the impeachment process , according to officials who , like others , spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal administration deliberations .
Trump ’ s push to remove Sondland and Vindman — and to exact punishment on other figures involved in the nearly five-month impeachment process — underscored how his fixation with settling scores is outweighing any effort to move on to less divisive issues in the wake of his acquittal .
Vindman ’ s twin brother , Lt. Col. Yevgeny Vindman , was also removed from his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ where he worked as a lawyer , and was escorted off the grounds Friday afternoon .
The firings of Sondland and Alexander Vindman amounted to a post-impeachment bloodletting of key figures who complied with congressional subpoenas and testified in a process that Trump sought to delegitimize as a “ hoax ” and a “ witch hunt.
” “ I ’ m not happy with him , ” Trump said earlier Friday when asked about Vindman ’ s future .
“ You think I ’ m supposed to be happy with him ?
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resistance from within the Republican Party to the idea of punishing Vindman , a Purple Heart recipient and Ukraine expert , after The Washington Post reported Thursday night that he could soon be removed from his White House job .
Some GOP lawmakers egged the president on — a sign of how much Trump has asserted his influence on the party .
Many lawmakers appeared to take it as a given that a president who fired an FBI director during a federal investigation into his campaign and who attacked the religious sincerity of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this week would set out for revenge in the wake of an effort to end his presidency .
“ I think the president ’ s entitled to have whoever he wants on the NSC , ” said Rep. Paul Mitchell ( R-Mich. ) .
“ It ’ s not like they ’ re being put on the street , they ’ ll go back to — in Vindman ’ s case , he goes back to the Pentagon .
”

Guess what, snowflakes: When you serve at the pleasure of the President, you can be fired at the displeasure of the president.
Trump has long wanted to fire Sondland, but has displayed great restraint and refused to do so during the impeachment process.
The Washington Post reports:
Sondland, who donated $1 million to Trump’s inaugural committee, fell out of favor with the president after his testimony in November alleging that the president pursued an improper “quid pro quo” tying military aid for Ukraine to political investigations. Trump has long wanted to remove Sondland but was counseled against doing so during the impeachment process, according to officials who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal administration deliberations.
Trump’s push to remove Sondland and Vindman — and to exact punishment on other figures involved in the nearly five-month impeachment process — underscored how his fixation with settling scores is outweighing any effort to move on to less divisive issues in the wake of his acquittal.
Vindman’s twin brother, Lt. Col. Yevgeny Vindman, was also removed from his job at the National Security Council, where he worked as a lawyer, and was escorted off the grounds Friday afternoon.
The firings of Sondland and Alexander Vindman amounted to a post-impeachment bloodletting of key figures who complied with congressional subpoenas and testified in a process that Trump sought to delegitimize as a “hoax” and a “witch hunt.”
“I’m not happy with him,” Trump said earlier Friday when asked about Vindman’s future. “You think I’m supposed to be happy with him? I’m not.”
There was little resistance from within the Republican Party to the idea of punishing Vindman, a Purple Heart recipient and Ukraine expert, after The Washington Post reported Thursday night that he could soon be removed from his White House job. Some GOP lawmakers egged the president on — a sign of how much Trump has asserted his influence on the party.
Many lawmakers appeared to take it as a given that a president who fired an FBI director during a federal investigation into his campaign and who attacked the religious sincerity of his perceived enemies during a prayer breakfast this week would set out for revenge in the wake of an effort to end his presidency.
“I think the president’s entitled to have whoever he wants on the NSC,” said Rep. Paul Mitchell (R-Mich.). “It’s not like they’re being put on the street, they’ll go back to — in Vindman’s case, he goes back to the Pentagon.”


welovetrump--2020-02-09--CLEANING HOUSE: A Day After Vindman, President Trump Recalls Amb. Sondland

Laura Ingraham celebrated what she called President Trump 's `` best week ever '' Friday on `` The Ingraham Angle , '' saying the president is winning `` on every front . ''
`` He 's winning , '' Ingraham said .
`` He 's winning on the economy , national security , judicial appointments and even legislatively his policies and his strategies are working and the American people are reaping huge benefits . ''
JAMES CARVILLE SOUNDS THE ALARM AS SANDERS SURGES IN PRIMARY : ' I 'M SCARED TO DEATH ' FOR DEMOCRATIC PARTY Ingraham also reacted to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Alexander Vindman and Ambassador Gordon Sondland by urging the president to continue the process .
`` Get rid of the radicals undermining from within and replace them with people who believe in your agenda , Mr. President , '' Ingraham said .
The also host celebrated the president 's economic numbers .
`` These are the good old days , folks , '' Ingraham said .
`` And surveys are showing that Americans are happier than they 've been for four decades , even happier than under Ronald Reagan .
This is great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's terrible news for the Democrats . ''

U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, who testified about President Trump’s Ukraine dealings during the House impeachment hearings, said Friday he had been recalled from his overseas position, hours after a National Security Council aide who testified against the president was also fired.
“I was advised today that the president intends to recall me effective immediately as United States ambassador to the European Union," Sondland said.
Sondland's recall follows the dismissal of another impeachment witness, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who was fired by the National Security Council and escorted off of the White House grounds on Friday.
IMPEACHMENT WITNESS VINDMAN FIRED, ESCORTED OUT OF WHITE HOUSE AFTER TRUMP ACQUITTAL
The moves come just two days after Trump was acquitted in the Senate on two articles of impeachment brought by the House last year over his dealings with Ukraine.
With Sondland and Vindman out, eight of 12 officials who testified publicly during the impeachment hearings have left their roles, been fired, or reassigned.


welovetrump--2020-02-09--Bernie Sanders: We Have a Racist Society From Top To Bottom

This anti-America , blame-America mob-think is taking over the Democrat party .
After Bernie 's remarks , the other candidates were quick to throw their hats into the race-baiting arena .
Do any of these candidates know how to think for themselves anymore ?
About an hour into the debate , they found their message : America , Bernie Sanders said , is “ a racist society from top to bottom.
” One by one , the candidates echoed the message that “ systemic racism ” characterizes America .
“ We can ’ t legislate away racism , ” said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deep in the American soul .
Joe Biden , verbatim ( poor Joe ) : “ The fact is that we in fact there is systemic racism.
” Elizabeth Warren even declared that “ we need race-conscious laws in education , in employment , in entrepreneurship to make this country a country for everyone.
” By which she means the law should actually be written to privilege people of color .
It ’ s one thing to trash Trump , which they did as they always do .
It ’ s one thing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stuff .
It ’ s another to spend an evening trashing the United States of America as a systematically unjust and even evil place whose rot reaches its very foundations .
You don ’ t win the presidency by telling a majority of voters — some of whom are the very voters you need to flip to win — that the system is unfairly rigged in their favor .
Even Trump , who began his presidency by talking about “ American carnage , ” did not say America was bad at its root @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ceased being great , and he was going to make it great again .

This anti-America, blame-America mob-think is taking over the Democrat party.
After Bernie's remarks, the other candidates were quick to throw their hats into the race-baiting arena. Do any of these candidates know how to think for themselves anymore?
From the NY Post:
About an hour into the debate, they found their message: America, Bernie Sanders said, is “a racist society from top to bottom.”
One by one, the candidates echoed the message that “systemic racism” characterizes America.
“We can’t legislate away racism,” said Andrew Yang, because racism runs so deep in the American soul.
Joe Biden, verbatim (poor Joe): “The fact is that we in fact there is systemic racism.”
Elizabeth Warren even declared that “we need race-conscious laws in education, in employment, in entrepreneurship to make this country a country for everyone.”
By which she means the law should actually be written to privilege people of color.
It’s one thing to trash Trump, which they did as they always do. It’s one thing to blame him for all kinds of stuff. It’s another to spend an evening trashing the United States of America as a systematically unjust and even evil place whose rot reaches its very foundations.
You don’t win the presidency by telling a majority of voters — some of whom are the very voters you need to flip to win — that the system is unfairly rigged in their favor.
Even Trump, who began his presidency by talking about “American carnage,” did not say America was bad at its root — rather, he said it had ceased being great, and he was going to make it great again.


welovetrump--2020-02-09--Pete Buttigieg Campaign Caught Adding Fake Applause Into CNN Town Hall Video Clips

Sharp observers noticed something odd when sneaky Pete Buttigieg shared clips from his town hall with CNN .
Turns out Pete add fake applause to a clip that the campaign uploaded to social media .
The Buttigieg campaign was called out on Friday over clips it shared from a CNN town hall for having fake applause added to the candidate ’ s remarks .
In one of the clips , shared by Team Pete HQ from a town hall last year , former South Bend , Ind.
, Mayor Pete Buttigieg pointed to statistical indicators that the current generation will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ financially well off as the previous generation .
“ To me , that is not just a concern for our generation , it ’ s a concern that calls on us to build an alliance among generations to try to make sure that the future really is better than the past , ” Buttigieg told an attendee , sparking audible applause with a graphic plugging Thursday night ’ s televised event .
However , the Center for Popular Democracy Action , a group supporting fellow Democratic candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders , I-Vt. , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feature any applause .
Buttigieg further elaborated with his response , which later did receive some applause .
The group also compared a second clip that was shared by the Buttigieg campaign of an exchange between Buttigieg and CNN anchor Jake Tapper over the candidate ’ s name .
“ Either way , it gets you there , ” Buttigieg responded , sparking some laughter and audible applause .
But the original clip of the exchange shows the laughter and no applause , with Buttigieg adding , “ Back home , they just @ @ @ @ @ @

Fake it… til you make it?
Sharp observers noticed something odd when sneaky Pete Buttigieg shared clips from his town hall with CNN.
Turns out Pete add fake applause to a clip that the campaign uploaded to social media.
According to Fox News,
The Buttigieg campaign was called out on Friday over clips it shared from a CNN town hall for having fake applause added to the candidate’s remarks.
In one of the clips, shared by Team Pete HQ from a town hall last year, former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg pointed to statistical indicators that the current generation will be the first to not be as financially well off as the previous generation.
“To me, that is not just a concern for our generation, it’s a concern that calls on us to build an alliance among generations to try to make sure that the future really is better than the past,” Buttigieg told an attendee, sparking audible applause with a graphic plugging Thursday night’s televised event.
However, the Center for Popular Democracy Action, a group supporting fellow Democratic candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., resurfaced the original clip which did not feature any applause. Buttigieg further elaborated with his response, which later did receive some applause.
The group also compared a second clip that was shared by the Buttigieg campaign of an exchange between Buttigieg and CNN anchor Jake Tapper over the candidate’s name.
“Not Boot-a-judge,” Tapper asked for clarification.
“Either way, it gets you there,” Buttigieg responded, sparking some laughter and audible applause.
But the original clip of the exchange shows the laughter and no applause, with Buttigieg adding, “Back home, they just call me Mayor Pete.”


welovetrump--2020-02-08--Jon Voight: “We will stand in the name of God. We will stand with President Trump!”

Here 's the full transcript of his remarks : '' This Pelosi woman and her cohorts are a threat to the United States of America .
She has a link that is corrupt .
Her soul has evil intent .
We will stand in the name of God .
We will stand with president Trump for he is the greatest President .
Watching his state of the union speech with pride and tears , I was moved by his words of wisdom .
Yes , my fellow Americans , words of truth and comfort .
He is the President .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ honor takes on and has done beyond his duties .
He is a father , a husband , a friend .
He has done what God has asked for to protect this country with open arms of love and protection for a nation that is being targeted against by some of its own , along with enemies from across the world .
The left radicals are trying , and I say trying to bring down the United States of America with lies and barbaric behavior .
This is not what God wants of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ let us stand in her glory , the glory of a nation that has been restored with the greatest president , Donald Trump , and we , the people of the Republican party gift our knowledge to the ignorant .
That they may open the door for truth and if they ca n't see this , let us continue our fight to keep our president of the United States of America in office because he is the greatest president since Abraham Lincoln .
God bless the USA . ''

Here's the full transcript of his remarks:
"This Pelosi woman and her cohorts are a threat to the United States of America. She has a link that is corrupt. Her soul has evil intent. We will stand in the name of God. We will stand with president Trump for he is the greatest President. Watching his state of the union speech with pride and tears, I was moved by his words of wisdom.
Yes, my fellow Americans, words of truth and comfort. He is the President. This is what a great man of honor takes on and has done beyond his duties. He is a father, a husband, a friend. He has done what God has asked for to protect this country with open arms of love and protection for a nation that is being targeted against by some of its own, along with enemies from across the world.
The left radicals are trying, and I say trying to bring down the United States of America with lies and barbaric behavior. This is not what God wants of his children. So my fellow Americans let us stand in her glory, the glory of a nation that has been restored with the greatest president, Donald Trump, and we, the people of the Republican party gift our knowledge to the ignorant.
That they may open the door for truth and if they can't see this, let us continue our fight to keep our president of the United States of America in office because he is the greatest president since Abraham Lincoln. God bless the USA."


welovetrump--2020-02-08--Top Romney Official and CIA Operative Served On Board of Burisma With Hunter Biden

Is it all starting to make sense now ?
Are the dots all starting to connect ?
Because they are for me .
The lone Republican to vote AGAINST President Trump and FOR impeachment was none other than RINO Romney .
But why did he do it ?
He claims it was out of morals and principle .
I ’ ve seen many say he ’ s just bitter and embarrassed that Trump is President and he ’ s not .
But did we just discover the real reason ?
Does it have much more to do with the fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Ukraine ?
Now before we go any further I want to make clear that “ guilt by association ” is a flimsy foundation to build a house on .
We ’ ve all probably had some contacts in our life we aren ’ t proud of .
Just because we had some connection to a person doesn ’ t mean we ’ re responsible for everything they ’ ve ever done .
But in this case , now that we ’ ve made this connection the question arises…..was there much more happening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t realize ?
THAT , my friends , is the million dollar question .
So here ’ s what we ’ ve now learned… .
Joseph Cofer Black is a CIA operative and former top level Senior Advisor to Mitt Romney .
He also happened to serve on the Burisma Board of Directors .
Of course we all know that Hunter Biden also was on the Board .

Is it all starting to make sense now?
Are the dots all starting to connect?
Because they are for me.
The lone Republican to vote AGAINST President Trump and FOR impeachment was none other than RINO Romney.
Or Benedict Romney.
Both names seem fitting.
But why did he do it?
He claims it was out of morals and principle.
Many don’t buy that story.
I’ve seen many say he’s just bitter and embarrassed that Trump is President and he’s not.
Perhaps.
But did we just discover the real reason?
Does it have much more to do with the fact that Romney has ties of his own to Ukraine?
Maybe so!
Now before we go any further I want to make clear that “guilt by association” is a flimsy foundation to build a house on.
We’ve all probably had some contacts in our life we aren’t proud of.
Just because we had some connection to a person doesn’t mean we’re responsible for everything they’ve ever done.
But in this case, now that we’ve made this connection the question arises…..was there much more happening behind the scenes that we don’t realize?
THAT, my friends, is the million dollar question.
So here’s what we’ve now learned….
Joseph Cofer Black is a CIA operative and former top level Senior Advisor to Mitt Romney.
He also happened to serve on the Burisma Board of Directors.
Of course we all know that Hunter Biden also was on the Board.


welovetrump--2020-02-08--Jim Jordan Given Big Promotion To Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee


welovetrump--2020-02-08--Utah Rep. Phil Lyman Moves to Censure Romney Over Impeachment Vote

After Utah Senator Mitt Romney voted to convict Trump , the state ’ s lawmakers moved quickly to distance themselves from the U.S .
Senator .
Utah lawmakers are asking their colleagues to send a message of support to President Donald Trump by censuring Sen. Mitt Romney over his impeachment vote and issuing a formal statement “ paying tribute ” to the nation ’ s chief executive .
State officials wasted no time Thursday in distancing themselves from Romney , R-Utah , who joined Senate Democrats on Wednesday in voting to convict Trump for abuse of power and remove the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only Republican to break ranks with his party during the impeachment process .
Rep. Phil Lyman , R-Blanding , early Thursday announced that he had filed a resolution to censure Romney , saying the senator ’ s judgment was questionable even if his motives were pure .
While the censure seemed to be a nonstarter with Senate leadership , a more conciliatory resolution surfaced later in the day .
After a “ tense ” meeting with Romney , House Speaker Brad Wilson revealed that he and Senate President Stuart Adams are jointly filing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supporting Utah .
The bill , Recall of United States Senator , is already public on the Utah State Legislature website for review .
Lyman drafted the bill in late January , but waited to make it public until it was clear which way Romney would vote .
Even Marco Rubio , who ran a bitter campaign against Trump in the 2016 primaries , was critical of Romney ’ s vote .
During the Democrat debate on Friday night , Romney received a standing ovation .
This is the exact reason conservatives don @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s be honest : we know the real reason Romney voted to convict Trump .
It has nothing to do with “ principle ” or morality .
Romney ’ s former press secretary said it best .
Is a senator who votes based on bitterness and jealousy who the people of Utah want to represent them ?
We ’ ll find out at the polls .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
49 views
Every action has a consequence.
After Utah Senator Mitt Romney voted to convict Trump, the state’s lawmakers moved quickly to distance themselves from the U.S. Senator.
The Salt Lake Tribute reports:
Utah lawmakers are asking their colleagues to send a message of support to President Donald Trump by censuring Sen. Mitt Romney over his impeachment vote and issuing a formal statement “paying tribute” to the nation’s chief executive. Trending: Updated Clinton Kill List: The List of People “Who Mysteriously Died” After Being Associates With The Clintons State officials wasted no time Thursday in distancing themselves from Romney, R-Utah, who joined Senate Democrats on Wednesday in voting to convict Trump for abuse of power and remove the president from office. He was the only Republican to break ranks with his party during the impeachment process. Rep. Phil Lyman, R-Blanding, early Thursday announced that he had filed a resolution to censure Romney, saying the senator’s judgment was questionable even if his motives were pure. While the censure seemed to be a nonstarter with Senate leadership, a more conciliatory resolution surfaced later in the day. After a “tense” meeting with Romney, House Speaker Brad Wilson revealed that he and Senate President Stuart Adams are jointly filing a resolution offering tribute to Trump for supporting Utah.
The bill, Recall of United States Senator, is already public on the Utah State Legislature website for review.
Lyman drafted the bill in late January, but waited to make it public until it was clear which way Romney would vote.
Even Marco Rubio, who ran a bitter campaign against Trump in the 2016 primaries, was critical of Romney’s vote.
I will be occasionally posting definitions of words & phrases used by political media in a series entitled #MediaWordOfTheDay Our first word is:
“prin·ci·pled”
:exhibiting,based on,or characterized by agreement with the views of the political left and/or their media enablers — Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) February 7, 2020
https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1226086084548927494
During the Democrat debate on Friday night, Romney received a standing ovation. This is the exact reason conservatives don’t trust RINOs.
But let’s be honest: we know the real reason Romney voted to convict Trump.
It has nothing to do with “principle” or morality.
Romney’s former press secretary said it best.
I believe Mitt Romney is motivated by bitterness and jealously that @realDonaldTrump accomplished what he has failed to do multiple times. His desire to pander to the chattering class has gotten the best of him…again. — Rick Gorka (@Rick_Gorka) February 5, 2020
Is a senator who votes based on bitterness and jealousy who the people of Utah want to represent them?
We’ll find out at the polls.


welovetrump--2020-02-08--Laura Ingraham Puts Mitt Romney On Notice That She Might Run Against Him

Here 's more on the developing story , from Fox News : '' If he were up for reelection this year , the people of Utah would have their own payback against him because they were defrauded by Romney .
For when he had to choose , he chose [ Charles ] Schumer and Kamala [ Harris ] over common sense and conservatism , '' Ingraham said .
`` If you 're one of Romney 's constituents in Utah , you 're out of luck .
If you 're a business in need of a regulation reexamined , do n't @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no power anymore . ''
Ingraham brought up Romney 's previous presidential runs saying , `` we thought you 'd be better for America and the way you repay millions of people , the millions who did vote for you in 2012 is to throw in with the very people who do n't share our goals , who hate us .
And by the way , who still hate you . ''
`` Like all the other bitter 'Never Trumpers ' , he 'd rather see the entire American economy go down the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' Ingraham said .
The host then called on Romney to resign from the Senate and said she 's considering moving to Utah in four years to oppose him .
`` Mitt , you made your stand .
Now should you should resign .
You committed a fraud on the people of Utah , on the Republican Party , on the Constitution , and a thoroughly embarrassed yourself , '' Ingraham said .
`` If I have to move there to run against him in four and a half years , I will @ @

Here's more on the developing story, from Fox News:
"If he were up for reelection this year, the people of Utah would have their own payback against him because they were defrauded by Romney. For when he had to choose, he chose [Charles] Schumer and Kamala [Harris] over common sense and conservatism," Ingraham said. "If you're one of Romney's constituents in Utah, you're out of luck. If you're a business in need of a regulation reexamined, don't bother calling his office. He has no power anymore."
Ingraham brought up Romney's previous presidential runs saying, "we thought you'd be better for America and the way you repay millions of people, the millions who did vote for you in 2012 is to throw in with the very people who don't share our goals, who hate us. And by the way, who still hate you."
"Like all the other bitter 'Never Trumpers', he'd rather see the entire American economy go down the drain than give Trump a victory," Ingraham said.
The host then called on Romney to resign from the Senate and said she's considering moving to Utah in four years to oppose him.
"Mitt, you made your stand. Now should you should resign. You committed a fraud on the people of Utah, on the Republican Party, on the Constitution, and a thoroughly embarrassed yourself," Ingraham said. "If I have to move there to run against him in four and a half years, I will."