welovetrump--2020-05-09--AG Barr: Mueller “Ignored” Evidence Of Russian Lies In Steele Dossier

The case of General Flynn is yet another example of misconduct from corrupt leaders at the FBI and other government agencies .
Newly revealed documents indicate that the FBI was attempting to `` set up '' Flynn or get him fired .
The Washington Examiner has more details on Barr 's view of what motivates investigators : In their interview , Herridge pressed Barr to assess what motivated the investigators .
“ These are very smart people who were working in the special counsel 's office and in senior levels of the FBI — so what drove them here ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ I think one of the things you have to guard against , both as a prosecutor and , I think , as an investigator , is that , if you get too wedded to a particular outcome and you 're pursuing a particular agenda , you close your eyes to anything that sort of does n't fit with your preconception , ” Barr said .
“ And I think that 's probably the phenomenon we 're looking at here.
” House Intelligence Committee witness interview transcripts , which were released to the public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s spy chief and other top national security and law enforcement officials from his administration testified that they did not see direct evidence of Trump-Russia collusion .
The attorney general also shed some light on the Justice Department ’ s decision to drop its case against Flynn over false statements he ’ d allegedly made to FBI agents in January 2017 related to his conversations with Russia ’ s ambassador .
“ But it 's on the question of materiality that we feel really that a crime can not be established here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ view , a legitimate investigation going on , ” Barr said .
“ They did not have a basis for a counterintelligence investigation against Flynn at that stage , based on a perfectly legitimate and appropriate call he made as a member of the transition.
” It is deeply disheartening to see politics infect justice .
Fortunately , Attorney General Barr is working to restore law and order within the highest levels of government .
Just as President Trump promised to drain the swamp , Barr is working to undo corrupt political investigations @ @ @ @ @ @

Mueller was appointed to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election.
However, it appears that Mueller might have ignored evidence that the Steele dossier was unreliable.
The Daily Caller has more on AG Barr's accusations:
Attorney General William Barr said in an interview aired Friday that special counsel Robert Mueller and his investigators “ignored” evidence of possible Russian disinformation in the Steele dossier.
“I think that’s one of the most troubling aspects of this whole thing,” Barr told CBS News when asked about the possibility that the Kremlin fed disinformation to Christopher Steele, a former British spy who investigated the Trump campaign.
Barr said he was “very concerned” at the possibility that the dossier and Steele “were used as a vector for the Russians to inject disinformation into the political campaign.”
The FBI relied heavily on information from Steele to obtain warrants to wiretap Trump campaign aide Carter Page. Multiple news outlets and Democrats in Congress also touted Steele’s information as evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government.
Despite Trump critics’ early confidence in the dossier, many of its allegations have come under scrutiny or been outright debunked over the past year or so. Mueller said in a report of his investigation released on April 18, 2019 that his investigators found no evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.
A Justice Department inspector general’s report on the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation did even more damage to Steele’s reputation, while raising questions about Mueller’s investigation.
[...] Barr said in his CBS interview that Mueller should have investigated the dossier further, especially since the point of the special counsel’s investigation was to uncover Russia’s interference in the U.S. political system.
As with General Flynn's case, it appears that the prosecutors appear more likely to pursue an agenda than they are to pursue the truth.
Barr has been investigating the origins of the Russia probe and has been exposing the corruption in the highest levels of government.


welovetrump--2020-05-09--Nicholas Sandmann: “Very Excited to Say I Will Be Graduating! … Don’t Back Down and Keep Winning!”

Sandmann was the center of a fake news controversy , where the media falsely accused him of harrassing an elderly Native American activist .
The accusations were created from a video clip that was taken out of context .
The story went viral after late night comedians accused Sandmann , a young white male , of `` smirking '' and getting in the path of the activist .
When the full video surfaced , however , it proved that Sandmann was innocent and was the victim of harrassment , not its perpetrator .
The Washington Examiner has more details on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ high school student who was the subject of controversial media coverage in 2019 because of a misleading video clip announced he is headed to college on a scholarship .
In a message posted on Friday , Nicholas Sandmann said he was `` very excited '' to share that he had been awarded a scholarship to attend college in the fall .
`` Very excited to say I will be graduating ! ''
Sandmann wrote .
`` After being told I would never get into college and my life was done , I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a scholarship !
Don ’ t back down and keep winning ! ''
Sandmann was swept up in controversy in early 2019 when CNN and several media figures accused the MAGA hat-wearing teenager of ridiculing a minority after a video showed him smiling in the face of a Native American man at the Lincoln Memorial during his school 's trip to the annual March for Life .
More video was later released that showed the entirety of the event , showing Sandmann and his peers being verbally accosted by a group of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ man approached and beat a drum close to Sandmann 's face .
Ever since the highly publicized incident , Sandmann has lived under constant threat .
Though the story was proven false , Sandmann 's life has been forever upended by the vicious and relentless media coverage .

Sandmann was the center of a fake news controversy, where the media falsely accused him of harrassing an elderly Native American activist.
The accusations were created from a video clip that was taken out of context.
The story went viral after late night comedians accused Sandmann, a young white male, of "smirking" and getting in the path of the activist.
When the full video surfaced, however, it proved that Sandmann was innocent and was the victim of harrassment, not its perpetrator.
The Washington Examiner has more details on Sandmann's future plans:
The Catholic high school student who was the subject of controversial media coverage in 2019 because of a misleading video clip announced he is headed to college on a scholarship.
In a message posted on Friday, Nicholas Sandmann said he was "very excited" to share that he had been awarded a scholarship to attend college in the fall.
"Very excited to say I will be graduating!" Sandmann wrote. "After being told I would never get into college and my life was done, I’ll be going to an amazing school on a scholarship! Don’t back down and keep winning!"
Sandmann was swept up in controversy in early 2019 when CNN and several media figures accused the MAGA hat-wearing teenager of ridiculing a minority after a video showed him smiling in the face of a Native American man at the Lincoln Memorial during his school's trip to the annual March for Life.
More video was later released that showed the entirety of the event, showing Sandmann and his peers being verbally accosted by a group of Black Hebrew Israelites before the Native American man approached and beat a drum close to Sandmann's face.
Ever since the highly publicized incident, Sandmann has lived under constant threat.
Though the story was proven false, Sandmann's life has been forever upended by the vicious and relentless media coverage.


welovetrump--2020-05-08--Ilhan Omar: U.S. “Needs” Universal Housing, Mail-In Ballots, and Basic Income

Never let a crisis go to waste , right ?
More and more Democrats appear to be taking Rahm Emanuel @ @ @ @ @ the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic .
Rather than protecting American lives and livelihoods , @ @ @ @ @ prioritizing partisan policies .
Representative Ilhan Omar is the latest Democrat leader to push a @ @ @ @ @ as a scapegoat to push the nation further to the left .
Omar took to @ @ @ @ @ Here ’ s what we need to make universal , as a start : Healthcare @ @ @ @ @ , Housing , Basic Income . ''
Ilhan Omar 's comments come just weeks after @ @ @ @ @ over $ 7 trillion to protect the economy from falling into a depression .
The @ @ @ @ @ out massive economic and job gains .
Democrats like Omar appear to be attempting to @ @ @ @ @ .
See what Omar wrote on Twitter :

Never let a crisis go to waste, right?
More and more Democrats appear to be taking Rahm Emanuel's words to heart in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Rather than protecting American lives and livelihoods, Democrat leaders appear to be prioritizing partisan policies.
Representative Ilhan Omar is the latest Democrat leader to push a progressive agenda, using COVID-19 as a scapegoat to push the nation further to the left.
Omar took to Twitter and posted, "Here’s what we need to make universal, as a start: Healthcare, School meals, Vote-by-mail, Housing, Basic Income."
Ilhan Omar's comments come just weeks after the federal government has spent over $7 trillion to protect the economy from falling into a depression.
The forced government shutdowns have wiped out massive economic and job gains.
Democrats like Omar appear to be attempting to make this government growth permanent.
See what Omar wrote on Twitter:


welovetrump--2020-05-08--Better Than Sarah Huckabee? New WH Press Sec. Kayleigh McEnany Hits The Press and Then Walks Off Sta

Better Than Sarah Huckabee? New WH Press Sec. Kayleigh McEnany Hits The Press and Then Walks Off Stage

While the media would prefer to play gotcha questions with the pandemic , Kayleigh McEnany is n't afraid to throw the fire right back at them .
Deadline has the details on McEnany 's second day on the job : In her second official briefing before the White House press corps , Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany was asked about a comment she made on Feb. 25 on Fox Business Channel , in which she said that because of President Donald Trump , “ we will not see diseases like the coronavirus come here.
” At the time , McEnany was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ press secretary .
On Wednesday , Reuters White House correspondent Jeff Mason asked her whether she would take the comment back , given what has happened since then .
But McEnany tried to turn the tables on the media , suggesting that a number of outlets also downplayed the threat of the coronavirus .
“ I was asked a question on Fox Business about the president ’ s travel restrictions , ” she said .
“ I noted what was the intent behind those travel restrictions , which is , we will not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not see terrorism come here , referring to an earlier set of travel restrictions.
” She added , “ I guess I would turn the question back on the media , and ask similar questions .
Does Vox want to take back that they proclaimed the coronavirus would not be a deadly pandemic ?
Does The Washington Post want to take back that they told Americans to get a grip , the flu is bigger than the coronavirus .
Does The Washington Post likewise want to take back that our brains are causing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus .
Does The New York Times want to take back that fear of the virus may be spreading faster than the virus itself .
Does NPR want to take back that the flu was a much bigger threat than the coronavirus ?
And finally , once again The Washington Post , would they like to take back that the government should not respond aggressively to the coronavirus.
” She then wrapped up the briefing and left .
While the media was reporting data from the `` experts , '' it 's important @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrong multiple times during the pandemic .
The WHO blindly parotted China 's claim , for example , that human-to-human transmission of the COVID-19 virus was impossible .
The data was wrong ... or at the very best , incomplete .
Even new models appear to fluctuate every day .
But rather than partnering with the Trump administration to fight the pandemic , the media as well as prominent Democrat leaders appear poised to undermine the adminsitration instead .

Amazing, indeed!
While the media would prefer to play gotcha questions with the pandemic, Kayleigh McEnany isn't afraid to throw the fire right back at them.
Deadline has the details on McEnany's second day on the job:
In her second official briefing before the White House press corps, Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany was asked about a comment she made on Feb. 25 on Fox Business Channel, in which she said that because of President Donald Trump, “we will not see diseases like the coronavirus come here.”
At the time, McEnany was working for the Trump campaign as national press secretary.
On Wednesday, Reuters White House correspondent Jeff Mason asked her whether she would take the comment back, given what has happened since then.
But McEnany tried to turn the tables on the media, suggesting that a number of outlets also downplayed the threat of the coronavirus.
“I was asked a question on Fox Business about the president’s travel restrictions,” she said. “I noted what was the intent behind those travel restrictions, which is, we will not see coronavirus come here. We will not see terrorism come here, referring to an earlier set of travel restrictions.”
She added, “I guess I would turn the question back on the media, and ask similar questions. Does Vox want to take back that they proclaimed the coronavirus would not be a deadly pandemic? Does The Washington Post want to take back that they told Americans to get a grip, the flu is bigger than the coronavirus. Does The Washington Post likewise want to take back that our brains are causing us to exaggerate the threat of the coronavirus. Does The New York Times want to take back that fear of the virus may be spreading faster than the virus itself. Does NPR want to take back that the flu was a much bigger threat than the coronavirus? And finally, once again The Washington Post, would they like to take back that the government should not respond aggressively to the coronavirus.” She then wrapped up the briefing and left.
While the media was reporting data from the "experts," it's important to note that authoritative voices have been wrong multiple times during the pandemic.
The WHO blindly parotted China's claim, for example, that human-to-human transmission of the COVID-19 virus was impossible.
The data was wrong... or at the very best, incomplete.
Even new models appear to fluctuate every day.
But rather than partnering with the Trump administration to fight the pandemic, the media as well as prominent Democrat leaders appear poised to undermine the adminsitration instead.


welovetrump--2020-05-08--FLYNN WIN: Justice Department Drops General Flynn’s Trump-Russia Case

The newly revealed FBI documents show that agents were attempting to `` get him [ Flynn ] to lie , so we can prosecute him or get him fired . ''
The case has long been under scrutiny , especially as many conservatives fear that Flynn was unfairly targeted for simply being associated with President Trump .
Fox News has more details on the DOJ 's decision to drop the case as well as Flynn 's response : The Justice Department on Thursday moved to drop its case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn , in a stunning development @ @ @ @ @ @ @ raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynn ’ s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI .
The announcement came in a court filing `` after a considered review of all the facts and circumstances of this case , including newly discovered and disclosed information , '' as the department put it .
DOJ officials said they concluded that Flynn 's interview by the FBI was `` untethered to , and unjustified by , the FBI 's counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn '' and that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legitimate investigative basis . ''
Later Thursday afternoon , Flynn tweeted a video of his grandson reciting The Pledge of Allegiance , along with the message , `` and JUSTICE for ALL . ''
The federal judge overseeing the case would have to make the final determination to dismiss it .
The retired Army lieutenant general for months has been trying to withdraw his plea , aided by a new attorney aggressively challenging the prosecution ’ s case and conduct .
But , the case has been plodding through the court system with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , even amid speculation about whether President Trump himself could extend a pardon .
The DOJ move to dismiss the case would appear to put an end to that process .
Earlier Thursday , the top prosecutor on the case , Brandon Van Grack , abruptly withdrew from the case , without explanation , in a brief filing with the court .
Breadcrumbs were being dropped in the days preceding the decision that his case could be reconsidered .
Documents unsealed a week ago by the Justice Department revealed agents discussed their motivations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – questioning whether they wanted to `` get him to lie '' so he 'd be fired or prosecuted , or get him to admit wrongdoing .
Flynn allies howled over the revelations , arguing that he essentially had been set up in a perjury trap .
In that interview , Flynn did not admit wrongdoing and instead was accused of lying about his contacts with the then-Russian ambassador – to which he pleaded guilty .
The latest DOJ filing noted Flynn 's false statement plea pertained to a crime that required a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but 'materially ' false with respect to a matter under investigation . ''
The filing showed that the government `` is not persuaded that the January 24 , 2017 interview was conducted with a legitimate investigative basis and therefore does not believe Mr. Flynn 's statements were material even if untrue . ''
The U.S. attorney reviewing the Flynn case , Jeff Jensen , recommended dropping the case to Attorney General William Barr last week and formalized the recommendation in a document this week .
`` Through the course of my review @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case , '' Jensen said in a statement .
`` I briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings , advised him on these conclusions , and he agreed . ''
President Trump reacted from the Oval Office just minutes after the DOJ filing surfaced .
`` He was an innocent man ... Now , in my book , he 's an even greater warrior , '' Trump said , while criticizing Obama administration officials .
`` They 're human scum .
...
It @ @ @ @ @

The newly revealed FBI documents show that agents were attempting to "get him [Flynn] to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired."
The case has long been under scrutiny, especially as many conservatives fear that Flynn was unfairly targeted for simply being associated with President Trump.
Fox News has more details on the DOJ's decision to drop the case as well as Flynn's response:
The Justice Department on Thursday moved to drop its case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, in a stunning development that comes after internal memos were released raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynn’s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI.
The announcement came in a court filing "after a considered review of all the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information," as the department put it. DOJ officials said they concluded that Flynn's interview by the FBI was "untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI's counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn" and that the interview was "conducted without any legitimate investigative basis."
Later Thursday afternoon, Flynn tweeted a video of his grandson reciting The Pledge of Allegiance, along with the message, "and JUSTICE for ALL."
The federal judge overseeing the case would have to make the final determination to dismiss it.
The retired Army lieutenant general for months has been trying to withdraw his plea, aided by a new attorney aggressively challenging the prosecution’s case and conduct. But, the case has been plodding through the court system with no resolution ever since his original plea, even amid speculation about whether President Trump himself could extend a pardon.
The DOJ move to dismiss the case would appear to put an end to that process.
Earlier Thursday, the top prosecutor on the case, Brandon Van Grack, abruptly withdrew from the case, without explanation, in a brief filing with the court.
Breadcrumbs were being dropped in the days preceding the decision that his case could be reconsidered. Documents unsealed a week ago by the Justice Department revealed agents discussed their motivations for interviewing him in the Russia probe – questioning whether they wanted to "get him to lie" so he'd be fired or prosecuted, or get him to admit wrongdoing. Flynn allies howled over the revelations, arguing that he essentially had been set up in a perjury trap. In that interview, Flynn did not admit wrongdoing and instead was accused of lying about his contacts with the then-Russian ambassador – to which he pleaded guilty.
The latest DOJ filing noted Flynn's false statement plea pertained to a crime that required a statement "to be not simply false, but 'materially' false with respect to a matter under investigation." The filing showed that the government "is not persuaded that the January 24, 2017 interview was conducted with a legitimate investigative basis and therefore does not believe Mr. Flynn's statements were material even if untrue."
The U.S. attorney reviewing the Flynn case, Jeff Jensen, recommended dropping the case to Attorney General William Barr last week and formalized the recommendation in a document this week.
"Through the course of my review of General Flynn's case, I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case," Jensen said in a statement. "I briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings, advised him on these conclusions, and he agreed."
President Trump reacted from the Oval Office just minutes after the DOJ filing surfaced. "He was an innocent man... Now, in my book, he's an even greater warrior," Trump said, while criticizing Obama administration officials. "They're human scum. ... It’s treason."


welovetrump--2020-05-08--Sen. Ted Cruz Gets a Haircut at Salon A La Mode After Owner Shelley Luther Released from Jail

During Cruz 's visit , Luther broke down in tears .
She has received tremendous support not only in Texas , but from observers from across the entire country .
A GoFundMe campaign raised $ 500,000 to help Luther pay for her legal bills .
The New York Post has more details on Luther 's appreciation of nationwide support : At one point during his visit to the Salon à la Mode , Luther began crying and thanked Cruz for his support .
“ When people reach out with true authenticity , it ’ s huge , ” she said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gesture .
His family actually called my boyfriend and prayed for him for 20 minutes while I was in jail , ” Luther told the news outlet .
“ To me that ’ s not political… that ’ s just really nice people reaching out and making sure that our family is OK , ” she said .
Luther was jailed Tuesday by Dallas County State District Judge Eric Moyé , but was sprung after Gov .
Greg Abbott ’ s executive order retroactively eliminating jail time for violating the state ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to seven days in the slammer with a fine of $ 1,000 per day — $ 500 per day for a contempt charge and $ 500 per day for each day her business was open .
On Wednesday , Cruz said on Twitter : “ 7 days in jail for cutting hair ?
?
This is NUTS .
And government officials don ’ t get to order citizens to apologize to them for daring to earn a living.
” Meanwhile , Luther said in an interview on “ Hannity ” on Thursday night @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brush with the law , adding that she stands by her decision not to apologize as Moyé had instructed her to .
“ That was the last thing I was going to do , honestly , ” she told Sean Hannity .
” … I just couldn ’ t , I couldn ’ t bring myself to apologize.
” The judge had given her the option of avoiding prison if she apologized for what he described as her “ selfish ” behavior , paid a fine and kept her salon closed until Friday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ open with restrictions .
“ We were shut down March 22 , so it had been several weeks that the government was kind of telling us the [ small business ] money was coming , ” Luther said .
“ The Dallas County Judge , Clay Jenkins , kept pushing back the date of when we would open weeks out in advance , before we would hear any new comings of what was going on with masks or whatever .
“ When he finally pushed it back a final time I just woke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ I have to open , my stylists are calling me , they ’ re not making their mortgage , ' ” she continued .
” … I ’ m two months behind on my mortgage.
” “ My stylists were telling me that they wanted [ to go ] underground and go to people ’ s houses , ” Luther added .
“ I just said , ‘ You know , that ’ s not a good idea because we can ’ t control the environment there .
We don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or anything like that , ’ and I just decided I would open.
” She stressed that during the time her business was open in defiance of the order , it instituted strict sanitation and social-distancing measures .
Luther said her short stint in jail was “ not pleasant , ” although she did have a cell to herself .

During Cruz's visit, Luther broke down in tears.
She has received tremendous support not only in Texas, but from observers from across the entire country.
A GoFundMe campaign raised $500,000 to help Luther pay for her legal bills.
The New York Post has more details on Luther's appreciation of nationwide support:
At one point during his visit to the Salon à la Mode, Luther began crying and thanked Cruz for his support.
“When people reach out with true authenticity, it’s huge,” she said.
“It’s a nice gesture. His family actually called my boyfriend and prayed for him for 20 minutes while I was in jail,” Luther told the news outlet.
“To me that’s not political… that’s just really nice people reaching out and making sure that our family is OK,” she said.
Luther was jailed Tuesday by Dallas County State District Judge Eric Moyé, but was sprung after Gov. Greg Abbott’s executive order retroactively eliminating jail time for violating the state’s coronavirus restrictions.
The judge sentenced Luther to seven days in the slammer with a fine of $1,000 per day — $500 per day for a contempt charge and $500 per day for each day her business was open.
On Wednesday, Cruz said on Twitter: “7 days in jail for cutting hair?? This is NUTS. And government officials don’t get to order citizens to apologize to them for daring to earn a living.”
Meanwhile, Luther said in an interview on “Hannity” on Thursday night that she felt much better after her brush with the law, adding that she stands by her decision not to apologize as Moyé had instructed her to.
“That was the last thing I was going to do, honestly,” she told Sean Hannity. ” … I just couldn’t, I couldn’t bring myself to apologize.”
The judge had given her the option of avoiding prison if she apologized for what he described as her “selfish” behavior, paid a fine and kept her salon closed until Friday, when hair salons across Texas could open with restrictions.
“We were shut down March 22, so it had been several weeks that the government was kind of telling us the [small business] money was coming,” Luther said.
“The Dallas County Judge, Clay Jenkins, kept pushing back the date of when we would open weeks out in advance, before we would hear any new comings of what was going on with masks or whatever.
“When he finally pushed it back a final time I just woke up one day and I said, ‘I have to open, my stylists are calling me, they’re not making their mortgage,'” she continued. ” … I’m two months behind on my mortgage.”
“My stylists were telling me that they wanted [to go] underground and go to people’s houses,” Luther added. “I just said, ‘You know, that’s not a good idea because we can’t control the environment there. We don’t know if it’s been disinfected or anything like that,’ and I just decided I would open.”
She stressed that during the time her business was open in defiance of the order, it instituted strict sanitation and social-distancing measures.
Luther said her short stint in jail was “not pleasant,” although she did have a cell to herself.


welovetrump--2020-05-09--Ilhan Omar Cries Racism in Dropped Case Against Flynn

Meanwhile , President Trump lauded the DOJ 's decision to drop charges against Flynn .
Trump has long criticized the chastising Flynn has undergone , particularly since he was such a distinguised military officer .
More from The Hill on the President 's comments below : President Trump on Thursday cheered the Justice Department ’ s move to drop the criminal case against Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn , calling his former national security adviser an “ innocent man ” and a “ warrior.
” '' He was an innocent man , ” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ great gentleman .
He was targeted by the Obama administration and he was targeted in order to try and take down a president , and what they 've done is a disgrace , and I hope a big price is going to be paid.
” “ Now in my book he ’ s an even greater warrior , ” Trump said of Flynn .
The Justice Department moved to dismiss the case against Flynn just minutes before Trump was asked about the decision , saying it no longer believed it could prove the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t aware of the Justice Department 's move ahead of time but said he “ felt it was going to happen ” based on recent developments .
The department said it had concluded that the interview during which Flynn later admitted he lied was “ untethered to , and unjustified by , the FBI ’ s counterintelligence investigation ” into the former national security adviser .
The Justice Department also said it was “ not persuaded that the January 24 , 2017 interview was conducted with a legitimate investigative basis and therefore does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were material even if untrue.
” U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan , a Clinton appointee who is overseeing Flynn ’ s case , will need to approve the decision to withdraw the case .
Elie Honig , a legal analyst and former federal prosecutor , said it was very unlikely Sullivan would reject the department ’ s bid to drop the case .
The development would mark a sudden end to the criminal case against Flynn more than two years after he pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his contacts with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interview as part of a deal to cooperate with former special counsel Robert Mueller ’ s investigation .
Flynn sought to withdraw his guilty plea earlier this year , alleging prosecutorial misconduct .
Trump , who has long castigated the Russia investigation as a “ witch hunt , ” on Thursday decried FBI officials as “ dishonest , crooked people ” and “ scum ” and accused the Obama administration of unfairly targeting his campaign , suggesting at one point agents were guilty of treason .
A Justice Department inspector general review completed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agents were motivated by bias in the decision to open the Russia probe , however .
The Justice Department ’ s move Thursday was met with cheers from the president ’ s allies .
“ Finally justice has been done in the case of General Flynn , ” tweeted Rudy Giuliani , Trump ’ s personal attorney who represented him during the Mueller investigation .

Whenever you hear certain buzz words trotted out by a liberal, you know you’ve won the argument.
In this case, the phrase is “white privilege.”
On Thursday, the Justice Department decided to drop charges against Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, a controversy that liberals have talked about for quite some time now.
Were the charges dropped because the Justice Department believed Michael Flynn did nothing wrong or was unfairly targeted?
Absolutely not according to Representative Ilhan Omar!
In response to news about the case dismissal, Omar tweeted the following:


welovetrump--2020-05-09--Watch Jon Voight’s “Message Of Hope” Video: Trump Is A ‘Man Of Great Integrity,’ ‘A Man Who Took On

Watch Jon Voight’s “Message Of Hope” Video: Trump Is A ‘Man Of Great Integrity,’ ‘A Man Who Took On Evil’

These can seem like dark times .
The COVID-19 pandemic has taken an incredible toll on human life , not to mention the economic toll that is impacting virtually everyone across the globe .
Recent developments around General Flynn indicate corruption within the FBI and the highest levels of government .
And Democratic leaders appear intent to use this crisis to pass partisan policies .
Still… despite all of this… there is always hope .
It is a message that Jon Voight does n't want us to forget .
In a video message posted to social media , Jon Voight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for those who follow him .
In the video , Voight praised Trump as a `` man of great integrity '' and a `` man who took on evil . ''
Voight also declared , `` Yes , he will go down as the historic president of this millennium , he will be etched in stone with a gold medal , a hero , and a President of the United States who won the battle , the war of 2020 .
He is Donald Trump .
God bless . ''
See the `` @ @ @ @ @ @ @ :

These can seem like dark times.
The COVID-19 pandemic has taken an incredible toll on human life, not to mention the economic toll that is impacting virtually everyone across the globe.
Recent developments around General Flynn indicate corruption within the FBI and the highest levels of government.
And Democratic leaders appear intent to use this crisis to pass partisan policies.
Still… despite all of this… there is always hope.
It is a message that Jon Voight doesn’t want us to forget.
In a video message posted to social media, Jon Voight shared a “Message of Hope” for those who follow him.
In the video, Voight praised Trump as a “man of great integrity” and a “man who took on evil.”
Voight also declared, “Yes, he will go down as the historic president of this millennium, he will be etched in stone with a gold medal, a hero, and a President of the United States who won the battle, the war of 2020. He is Donald Trump. God bless.”
See the “Message of Hope” for yourself below:


welovetrump--2020-05-09--Ginsburg Writes UNANIMOUS Supreme Court Opinion Overturning the 9th Circuit In Illegal Immigration C

Ginsburg Writes UNANIMOUS Supreme Court Opinion Overturning the 9th Circuit In Illegal Immigration Case

Democrats often like to bash the Supreme Court as politicized after Trump was able to successfully appoint two justices .
However , the ruling was unanimous and Ginsberg , the liberal firebrand , rebuked the 9th Circuit Panel .
According to the National Law Journal : In an opinion Thursday , Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg , speaking for a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court , had unusually harsh criticism of a federal appellate panel for a practice that some court experts say the justices often embrace themselves .
Violation of the “ party presentation ” principle—central to Thursday ’ s ruling—is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ high court case .
The principle refers to the long-standing feature of the court system that the parties involved in litigation , and not judges , are responsible for raising the legal issues a court must resolve .
That principle rarely appears in a Supreme Court decision , and the ruling was all the more remarkable that its author—Ginsburg—rebuked a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in accusatory terms that said the court ’ s “ transformation ” of a case went “ well beyond the pale.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ case United States v. Sineneng-Smith .
Evelyn Sineneng-Smith , who operated an immigration consulting firm in San Jose , California , was convicted of violating a federal law making it a felony to “ encourage or induce an alien to come to , enter , or reside in the United States , knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to , entry , or residence is or will be in violation of law.
” Sineneng-Smith helped undocumented immigrants apply for labor certification even though she knew they did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ services , she collected more than $ 3.3 million from them between 2001 and 2008 .
In appealing her conviction , her attorney raised the same arguments presented to the district court , but then her appeal moved “ onto a different track , ” according to Ginsburg .
“ Instead of adjudicating the case presented by the parties , the appeals court named three amici and invited them to brief and argue issues framed by the panel , including a question Sineneng-Smith herself never raised earlier : ‘ Whether the statute of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Amendment , ’ ” Ginsburg wrote .
Lawyers for the parties to the appeal were assigned a secondary role , Ginsburg said .
The three amici appointed to brief and argue were the circuit ’ s Federal Defender Organizations ( as a group ) , the Immigrant Defense Project , and the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild .
The panel identified three issues for the briefing and gave amici 20 minutes to argue and 10 minutes to Sineneng-Smith ’ s counsel .
“ The party presentation principle is supple , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ There are no doubt circumstances in which a modest initiating role for a court is appropriate .
But this case scarcely fits that bill.
” Although a court is not “ hide-bound ” by a party ’ s counsel ’ s precise arguments , Ginsburg said “ the Ninth Circuit ’ s radical transformation of this case goes well beyond the pale.
” The Ninth Circuit ’ s judgment was vacated and the case remanded “ for reconsideration shorn of the overbreadth inquiry interjected by the appellate panel and bearing a fair @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parties.
” The court , in another unusual move , issued an addendum identifying cases from 2015 to 2020 in which the justices called for supplemental briefing or appointed an amicus curiae .
Ginsburg , in a footnote , wrote : “ None of them bear any resemblance to the redirection ordered by the Ninth Circuit panel in this case.
” In the addendum , the court highlighted cases where it sought supplemental briefing to decide whether a controversy existed to support review in the first place ; to determine whether a case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ question presented ; and whether a constitutional issue was implicated by the question presented , among other reasons .

Democrats often like to bash the Supreme Court as politicized after Trump was able to successfully appoint two justices.
However, the ruling was unanimous and Ginsberg, the liberal firebrand, rebuked the 9th Circuit Panel.
According to the National Law Journal:
In an opinion Thursday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, speaking for a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court, had unusually harsh criticism of a federal appellate panel for a practice that some court experts say the justices often embrace themselves.
Violation of the “party presentation” principle—central to Thursday’s ruling—is not often the basis for deciding a high court case. The principle refers to the long-standing feature of the court system that the parties involved in litigation, and not judges, are responsible for raising the legal issues a court must resolve.
That principle rarely appears in a Supreme Court decision, and the ruling was all the more remarkable that its author—Ginsburg—rebuked a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in accusatory terms that said the court’s “transformation” of a case went “well beyond the pale.”
Ginsburg’s opinion was in the case United States v. Sineneng-Smith. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith, who operated an immigration consulting firm in San Jose, California, was convicted of violating a federal law making it a felony to “encourage or induce an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.”
Sineneng-Smith helped undocumented immigrants apply for labor certification even though she knew they did not meet the application-filing deadline. For her services, she collected more than $3.3 million from them between 2001 and 2008. In appealing her conviction, her attorney raised the same arguments presented to the district court, but then her appeal moved “onto a different track,” according to Ginsburg.
“Instead of adjudicating the case presented by the parties, the appeals court named three amici and invited them to brief and argue issues framed by the panel, including a question Sineneng-Smith herself never raised earlier: ‘Whether the statute of conviction is overbroad … under the First Amendment,’” Ginsburg wrote.
Lawyers for the parties to the appeal were assigned a secondary role, Ginsburg said. The three amici appointed to brief and argue were the circuit’s Federal Defender Organizations (as a group), the Immigrant Defense Project, and the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild. The panel identified three issues for the briefing and gave amici 20 minutes to argue and 10 minutes to Sineneng-Smith’s counsel.
“The party presentation principle is supple, not ironclad,” Ginsburg wrote. “There are no doubt circumstances in which a modest initiating role for a court is appropriate. But this case scarcely fits that bill.”
Although a court is not “hide-bound” by a party’s counsel’s precise arguments, Ginsburg said “the Ninth Circuit’s radical transformation of this case goes well beyond the pale.” The Ninth Circuit’s judgment was vacated and the case remanded “for reconsideration shorn of the overbreadth inquiry interjected by the appellate panel and bearing a fair resemblance to the case shaped by the parties.”
The court, in another unusual move, issued an addendum identifying cases from 2015 to 2020 in which the justices called for supplemental briefing or appointed an amicus curiae. Ginsburg, in a footnote, wrote: “None of them bear any resemblance to the redirection ordered by the Ninth Circuit panel in this case.”
In the addendum, the court highlighted cases where it sought supplemental briefing to decide whether a controversy existed to support review in the first place; to determine whether a case could be resolved more narrowly than the question presented; and whether a constitutional issue was implicated by the question presented, among other reasons.


welovetrump--2020-05-09--What Did Obama and Biden Know About Flynn & When Did They Know It? Mark Levin Demands Answers!

The new documents also suggest that a meeting at the Obama White House on January 6 , 2017 was of paramount importance .
An analysis of the timeline suggests that key law enforcement and intelligence officials were coordinating to undermine the incoming Trump administration 's ability to run the country .
According to The Federalist : Information released in the Justice Department ’ s motion to dismiss the case it brought against Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn confirms the significance of a January 5 , 2017 , meeting at the Obama White House .
It was at this meeting that Obama @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be tasked with protecting his administration ’ s utilization of secretly funded Clinton campaign research , which alleged Trump was involved in a treasonous plot to collude with Russia , from being discovered or stopped by the incoming administration .
“ President Obama said he wants to be sure that , as we engage with the incoming team , we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we can not share information fully as it relates to Russia , ” National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote in an unusual email @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also attended by Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates , FBI Director James Comey , and Vice President Joe Biden .
A clearer picture is emerging of the drastic steps that were taken to accomplish Obama ’ s goal in the following weeks and months .
Shortly thereafter , high-level operatives began intensely leaking selective information supporting a supposed Russia-Trump conspiracy theory , the incoming National Security Advisor was ambushed , and the incoming Attorney General was forced to recuse himself from oversight of investigations of President Trump .
At each major point in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a key strategy in the operation to take down Trump .
Not only was information on Russia not fully shared with the incoming Trump team , as Obama directs , the leaks and ambushes made the transition chaotic , scared quality individuals away from working in the administration , made effective governance almost impossible , and materially damaged national security .
When Comey was finally fired on May 9 , in part for his duplicitousness regarding his handling of the Russia collusion theory , he orchestrated the launch of a Special Counsel probe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years .
That probe ended with Mueller finding no evidence of any American colluding with Russia to steal the 2016 election , much less Trump or anyone connected to him .
While the Trump-Russia hoax was covered breathlessly by the news media , much less attention has been given to General Michael Flynn .
Furthermore , many of the liberal mouthpieces have accused Trump of `` politicizing '' the justice system , though it was the DOJ itself that dropped the charges .
Had Trump wanted to interfere , he could have issued @ @ @ @ @ @ @ documents reveal that Flynn was victimized for simply being an associate of President Trump .

A fish rots from the head down, so they say…
If that's the case, then FBI misconduct in the case of General Michael Flynn was likely not an anomaly, but perhaps part of the culture under President Barack Obama.
Corrupt FBI attempted to frame and "set up" General Flynn, new documents suggest.
Their goal?
Well, it wasn't to get Flynn to tell the truth. Rather, these FBI agents explicity stated that they wanted to get Flynn "to lie" so they could take him down.
So… this raises the question…
What exactly did former President Barack Obama and former VP Joe Biden know about the fraudulent case against General Flynn? And when did they know it?
Mark Levin demanded these answers on Fox News' Hannity.
Watch the interview below:


welovetrump--2020-05-09--Chuck Schumer Vows to “Fight Like the Devil” for Mail-In Voting in Next Coronavirus Stimulus

In the interview , Schumer said of voter-ID : It ’ s aimed at stopping people of color and poor people from voting .
We feel extremely strongly that everyone should be able to vote , that the COVID crisis should not stand in the way of what is the hallmark , the wellspring of America , which is free , fair , and open elections , and that will be a very important part of the legislation that we ’ re going to put forward , and we are going to fight like the devil for it .
Ummm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voting block from being able to cast a vote ... Voter ID only stops illegitimate voters and non-citizens from participating in our elections .
A leader in the Senate should NOT be fighting `` like the devil '' for anyone to be able to vote in U.S. elections .
After years of investigating alleged Trump-Russia collusion , you 'd think that Democrats would be more concerned about election security !
According to the Baltimore Sun , voting by mail fails to secure the integrity of the vote : Some Americans believe opening the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ idea ; all foxes believe opening the gate to the chicken house is a good idea .
The commonality , of course , is that temptation sometimes proves to be irresistible — both to foxes and humans .
Superficially , voting by mail sounds like a panacea designed to lower costs and spare the American voter the “ inconvenience ” of trekking off to the polls every two years only to find himself wending his way to the voting area through a battery of last-minute solicitations meant to sway his vote .
Further @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over his preferences at home rather than mulling over his selections at the voting station and holding up a line of people who want to cast their vote and go .
But before we buy into mail-in voting , let ’ s carefully consider the potential complications associated with a panacea that could later find us struggling to extricate ourselves from a quagmire .
First .
Verification of every voter and his right to vote should be confirmed — before he casts a vote .
Those who criticize the requirement of photo/voter ID @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about to participate in a privilege bought with a sea of American blood , amaze me .
If I ’ m stopped by a police officer while driving , that officer wants to see my license/photo ID .
When I show up for any medical procedure , I need to produce my photo ID .
If I want to travel out of the country , I need my passport — photo attached .
In each of these examples , we are compliant because we understand the issues of safety and security .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know that his vote is protected by that same level of security , that it will not be diluted by illegally cast votes of non-citizens , dead citizens , and multiple votes by the same voter using different identities .
Second .
While absentee mail-in ballots are available ( and necessary ) upon request to those who are unable to appear in person to vote by reason of distance ( e.g.
, military service or employment requirements ) or infirmity ( the elderly or medically compromised ) , the system is wide open @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In 2018 , “ ballot harvesting , ” the practice in which workers or volunteers collect absentee ballots and deliver them to polling places or the election office , became an issue in California .
Questions and accusations arose concerning how much “ help ” those volunteers gave to the elderly or those less informed in completing their ballots .
Whether any fraud was actually involved is irrelevant .
The problem lies with the appearance , the ease with which ballot tampering could occur .
After complaining that Russians interfered in the 2016 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrats would be the first in line to require voter ID !
Furthermore , should n't the next COVID-19 stimulus package be focused on actually protecting American lives and livelihoods ?
!
Instead , the Democrats appear to be prioritizing partisan policies like vote by mail !

In the interview, Schumer said of voter-ID:
It’s aimed at stopping people of color and poor people from voting. We feel extremely strongly that everyone should be able to vote, that the COVID crisis should not stand in the way of what is the hallmark, the wellspring of America, which is free, fair, and open elections, and that will be a very important part of the legislation that we’re going to put forward, and we are going to fight like the devil for it.
Ummm... voter ID does not prevent any voting block from being able to cast a vote...
Voter ID only stops illegitimate voters and non-citizens from participating in our elections.
A leader in the Senate should NOT be fighting "like the devil" for anyone to be able to vote in U.S. elections.
After years of investigating alleged Trump-Russia collusion, you'd think that Democrats would be more concerned about election security!
According to the Baltimore Sun, voting by mail fails to secure the integrity of the vote:
Some Americans believe opening the gate to mail-in voting is a good idea; all foxes believe opening the gate to the chicken house is a good idea. The commonality, of course, is that temptation sometimes proves to be irresistible — both to foxes and humans.
Superficially, voting by mail sounds like a panacea designed to lower costs and spare the American voter the “inconvenience” of trekking off to the polls every two years only to find himself wending his way to the voting area through a battery of last-minute solicitations meant to sway his vote. Further, it allows the voter to luxuriate over his preferences at home rather than mulling over his selections at the voting station and holding up a line of people who want to cast their vote and go.
But before we buy into mail-in voting, let’s carefully consider the potential complications associated with a panacea that could later find us struggling to extricate ourselves from a quagmire.
First. Verification of every voter and his right to vote should be confirmed — before he casts a vote.
Those who criticize the requirement of photo/voter ID, the ability to identify the person about to participate in a privilege bought with a sea of American blood, amaze me. If I’m stopped by a police officer while driving, that officer wants to see my license/photo ID. When I show up for any medical procedure, I need to produce my photo ID. If I want to travel out of the country, I need my passport — photo attached. In each of these examples, we are compliant because we understand the issues of safety and security.
The American citizen is no less entitled to know that his vote is protected by that same level of security, that it will not be diluted by illegally cast votes of non-citizens, dead citizens, and multiple votes by the same voter using different identities.
Second. While absentee mail-in ballots are available (and necessary) upon request to those who are unable to appear in person to vote by reason of distance (e.g., military service or employment requirements) or infirmity (the elderly or medically compromised), the system is wide open to potential fraud and misdirected ballots.
In 2018, “ballot harvesting,” the practice in which workers or volunteers collect absentee ballots and deliver them to polling places or the election office, became an issue in California. Questions and accusations arose concerning how much “help” those volunteers gave to the elderly or those less informed in completing their ballots.
Whether any fraud was actually involved is irrelevant. The problem lies with the appearance, the ease with which ballot tampering could occur.
After complaining that Russians interfered in the 2016 presidential election, you'd think that Democrats would be the first in line to require voter ID!
Furthermore, shouldn't the next COVID-19 stimulus package be focused on actually protecting American lives and livelihoods?!
Instead, the Democrats appear to be prioritizing partisan policies like vote by mail!


welovetrump--2020-05-09--Obama Bashes Trump for Draining the Swamp: “Rule of Law Is At Risk”

Former President Barack Obama has launched a new attack on President Donald Trump , accusing him of `` fixing '' @ @ @ @ @ Michael Flynn .
Rather than pardoning Flynn , Trump allowed the justice system to play @ @ @ @ @ did justice decide ?
Well , due to new never-before-seen exculpatory evidence , the Department @ @ @ @ @ charges against Michael Flynn .
The worst you could say is that Barr 's decision @ @ @ @ @ was that it was a political decision .
But the facts show that the FBI @ @ @ @ @ '' Flynn .
Furthermore , the basis for the investigation itself appears to be based @ @ @ @ @ .
And while President Trump and his administration continue to clean the swamp or corruption @ @ @ @ @ undermines him by accusing him of threatening the law itself .
More details on Obama @ @ @ @ @

Methinks thou dost protest too much…
Former President Barack Obama has launched a new attack on President Donald Trump, accusing him of "fixing" the dropped charges against General Michael Flynn.
Rather than pardoning Flynn, Trump allowed the justice system to play its role.
And what did justice decide?
Well, due to new never-before-seen exculpatory evidence, the Department of Justice dropped all its charges against Michael Flynn.
The worst you could say is that Barr's decision to drop charges against Flynn was that it was a political decision.
But the facts show that the FBI attempted to "set up" Flynn.
Furthermore, the basis for the investigation itself appears to be based on lies and Russian disinformation.
And while President Trump and his administration continue to clean the swamp or corruption and dirty agents, Obama undermines him by accusing him of threatening the law itself.
More details on Obama's wild accusation below:


welovetrump--2020-05-11--Flynn’s Attorney Claims Obama Part of Plot to Frame Flynn

Well here ’ s one for the books .
What we know at this point is that officials at the FBI specifically manuevered their investigation of Michael Flynn in such a way to catch him in the crime of “ lying to investigators.
” Day by day , we ’ re learning more and more about the deep-state corruption that was occuring at the FBI during Obama ’ s presidency .
It ’ s pretty clear that some officials at the FBI used their power to go after the Trump campaign and anyone associated with it .
Of course , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was Michael Flynn .
Charges against Flynn for “ lying to investigators ” have since been dropped by the DOJ .
Now , Flynn ’ s top attorney claims that President Obama had information that the FBI was in the act of framing Flynn .
Former National Security Adviser Gen. Michael Flynn ’ s lead attorney accused top officials of orchestrating a plot to frame her client , insisting that former President Barack Obama himself was in on it .
Flynn had initially pleaded guilty to providing a false statement to the FBI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but later changed his story and pushed back by questioning the FBI ’ s tactics .
“ These agents specifically schemed and planned with each other how to not tip him off , that he was even the person being investigated , ” Powell told Fox News ’ “ Sunday Morning Futures , ” pointing to evidence that FBI agents took a casual approach with Flynn , not telling him they were investigating him and not warning him that it would be a federal crime to lie during their conversation .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deliberately as part of their effort to set him up and frame him , ” Powell said .
According to recently released testimony , President Obama revealed during an Oval Office meeting weeks before the interview that he knew about Flynn ’ s phone call with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak , apparently surprising then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates .
After the meeting , Obama asked Yates and then-FBI Director James Comey to “ stay behind.
” Obama “ specified that he did not want any additional information on the matter , but was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should be treating Flynn any differently , given the information.
” “ The whole thing was orchestrated and set up within the FBI , [ former Director of National Intelligence James ] Clapper , [ Former CIA Director John ] Brennan , and in the Oval Office meeting that day with President Obama , ” Powell said .
When asked if she believes that Flynn was the victim of a plot that went all the way up to Obama , Powell said , “ Absolutely.
” If this is true and President Obama @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would represent a disgusting abuse of presidential power .

Well here’s one for the books.
What we know at this point is that officials at the FBI specifically manuevered their investigation of Michael Flynn in such a way to catch him in the crime of “lying to investigators.”
Day by day, we’re learning more and more about the deep-state corruption that was occuring at the FBI during Obama’s presidency. It’s pretty clear that some officials at the FBI used their power to go after the Trump campaign and anyone associated with it.
Of course, the most high-profile victim of all this was Michael Flynn.
Charges against Flynn for “lying to investigators” have since been dropped by the DOJ.
Now, Flynn’s top attorney claims that President Obama had information that the FBI was in the act of framing Flynn.
Here’s the latest details from Fox News:
Former National Security Adviser Gen. Michael Flynn’s lead attorney accused top officials of orchestrating a plot to frame her client, insisting that former President Barack Obama himself was in on it. Flynn had initially pleaded guilty to providing a false statement to the FBI regarding his contact with a Russian ambassador, but later changed his story and pushed back by questioning the FBI’s tactics. “These agents specifically schemed and planned with each other how to not tip him off, that he was even the person being investigated,” Powell told Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” pointing to evidence that FBI agents took a casual approach with Flynn, not telling him they were investigating him and not warning him that it would be a federal crime to lie during their conversation. “So they kept him relaxed and unguarded deliberately as part of their effort to set him up and frame him,” Powell said. According to recently released testimony, President Obama revealed during an Oval Office meeting weeks before the interview that he knew about Flynn’s phone call with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, apparently surprising then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates. After the meeting, Obama asked Yates and then-FBI Director James Comey to “stay behind.” Obama “specified that he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information.” “The whole thing was orchestrated and set up within the FBI, [former Director of National Intelligence James] Clapper, [Former CIA Director John] Brennan, and in the Oval Office meeting that day with President Obama,” Powell said. When asked if she believes that Flynn was the victim of a plot that went all the way up to Obama, Powell said, “Absolutely.”
If this is true and President Obama inserted himself into this matter, it would represent a disgusting abuse of presidential power.
Support for Flynn erupted on Twitter:


welovetrump--2020-05-10--Tucker Carlson Calls for “Sociopath” Schiff to Resign Over Russia Investigation in Fiery Monologue

It has not been a good week for Adam Schiff… First , Trey Gowdy threatened to reveal the names of news reporters who `` aided and abetted '' Schiff in the Russian collusion hoax .
Gowdy appeared on Hannity on Friday night and hinted that CNN and Politico were at least 2 news organizations where reporters colluded with Schiff .
Specific names of reporters are expected to be revealed by Gowdy in the upcoming days or weeks .
Now , Tucker Carlson has called for `` Sociopath '' Adam Schiff to resign over his role in the Russia investigation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ or say anything in order to get more power .
Specifically , Carlson slammed Schiff for claiming that he had damning evidence of Russian collusion , when the reality was that he did n't have a single shred of evidence .
Schiff knowingly went on news networks proclaiming that he had proof of Russian collusion… But the problem is that those claims of proof never materialized .
Yes , it appears that Schiff LIED about having evidence even as he presided over the Russia investigations .
And that 's exaclty why Tucker Carlson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fiery monologue .

It has not been a good week for Adam Schiff…
At all.
First, Trey Gowdy threatened to reveal the names of news reporters who "aided and abetted" Schiff in the Russian collusion hoax.
Gowdy appeared on Hannity on Friday night and hinted that CNN and Politico were at least 2 news organizations where reporters colluded with Schiff.
Specific names of reporters are expected to be revealed by Gowdy in the upcoming days or weeks.
Now, Tucker Carlson has called for "Sociopath" Adam Schiff to resign over his role in the Russia investigation.
Carlson warned viewers that Schiff will do or say anything in order to get more power.
Specifically, Carlson slammed Schiff for claiming that he had damning evidence of Russian collusion, when the reality was that he didn't have a single shred of evidence.
Schiff knowingly went on news networks proclaiming that he had proof of Russian collusion…
But the problem is that those claims of proof never materialized.
Yes, it appears that Schiff LIED about having evidence even as he presided over the Russia investigations.
And that's exaclty why Tucker Carlson called for him to resign in a fiery monologue.
Watch it below:


welovetrump--2020-05-10--Trey Gowdy Threatens to Expose Reporters Who Colluded with Adam Schiff on Russian Investigation

When he was a prosecutor , Gowdy was well known for never losing a case .
He has experience to understand how insider business works and what happens behind the scenes on Capitol Hill .
Real Clear Politics has the transcript of Gowdy 's take on the validity of the Russian dossier that has come under intense scrutiny : SEAN HANNITY , FOX NEWS : Mr. Gowdy , I actually am very impressed .
I 've always known .
You were a prosecutor that never lost a case and as I read parts of these 6,000 pages , I 'm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and I 'm even cranky tonight .
But I see that you grilled Andrew McCabe .
At what point did the bureau ask Steele , why did you do this research , who were you doing it for , is anyone paying you to do it ?
When did those questions came up ?
Well , his answer , Trey Gowdy , am I reading this correctly ?
The answer to your question is `` I do n't know '' the answer to that ?
Is that possible at this point ?
Did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ TREY GOWDY , FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR : Yes , it happened .
We spent a long time with Andy McCabe .
The dossier , not only was it not verified they had not even begun to verify it when we talked to Andy McCabe .
It was after it was used .
Now , granted they used it in a court proceeding , in a pleading , but they had not even taken the first step towards trying to verify that when we interviewed Andy McCabe .
You know , Sean , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ n't just that we asked Susan Rice and Samantha Power and Ben Rhodes and Sally Yates , we did n't just say give us all the evidence of collusion coordination and conspiracy , I asked every one of them , even if it 's hearsay , even if it 's something you heard that you did n't believe , even if it 's inadmissible in court , tell me everything you 've ever heard about Trump , his campaign or even the groupies and the hangers-on in his campaign conspiring with Russia , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Adam Schiff are very low .
He still does n't meet him but they 're very low my invitations of the D.C. media was a little bit higher and they aided and abetted him for the entire year we conducted this investigation .

Indeed, without the fake news media spreading lies about the Russian conspiracy theory, Adam Schiff wouldn't have been able to perpetrate his hoax against President Trump.
Just this week, more dominoes fell in the case AGAINST Trump-Russia collussion.
Newly unveiled FBI documents show that dirty FBI agents were intentionally setting up General Michael Flynn with the goal of getting him to lie.
That is politics, not a pursuit of justice!
Adam Schiff needs to be held accountable.
And to ensure that no other radical Democratic leader can do this again, the media who helped spread this hoax must be held responsible.
Now, Gowdy is threatening to expose the names of the reporters who colluded with Adam Schiff, the Washington Examiner reports:
Former federal prosecutor Trey Gowdy says voting out Democratic California Rep. Adam Schiff is not enough punishment for the damage he has done to President Trump and the intelligence community.
During a Friday night appearance on Hannity, Gowdy told the Fox News host he also wants reporters who advanced the fake Russian collusion story to be named publicly and that he's willing to do it.
"The media, not only did they not provide scrutiny over Adam Schiff, they aided and abetted him," Gowdy said. "Politico, the Hill, Washington Post, New York Times, I'll come on and even give you the reporters' names sometimes. The reporters who sat there and helped Adam Schiff perpetrate this fraud, next time I'm with you I'll give you the names of the reporters."
Gowdy recounted questioning officials in the Obama administration about evidence they had, which would prove the Kremlin worked to get Trump elected in 2016.
"I asked every one of them. Even if it's hearsay, even if it's something you heard that you didn't believe. Even if it's inadmissible in court, tell me everything you've ever heard about Trump, his campaign, or even the groupies and the hangers-on in his campaign, and there was nothing, so my expectations of Adam Schiff are very low. He still doesn't meet them, but they're very low. My expectation of the D.C. media was a little higher, and they aided and abetted him for the entire year we conducted this investigation."
Gowdy added that he would like to see members of the media dig deeper into the ouster of former national security adviser Michael Flynn after it was revealed that partisan agents in the FBI attempted to get him to lie so they could then prosecute him.
On Sunday, Gowdy told Fox News's Maria Bartiromo that reporters at at least 2 outlets are among them.
They are CNN and Politico.
See below:


welovetrump--2020-05-09--Jon Voight’s “Message of Hope”: Trump Is A ‘Man Of Great Integrity,’ ‘A Man Who Took On Evil’

These can seem like dark times .
The COVID-19 pandemic has taken an incredible toll on human life , not to mention the economic toll that is impacting virtually everyone across the globe .
Recent developments around General Flynn indicate corruption within the FBI and the highest levels of government .
And Democratic leaders appear intent to use this crisis to pass partisan policies .
Still… despite all of this… there is always hope .
It is a message that Jon Voight doesn ’ t want us to forget .
In a video message posted to social media , Jon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” for those who follow him .
In the video , Voight praised Trump as a “ man of great integrity ” and a “ man who took on evil.
” Voight also declared , “ Yes , he will go down as the historic president of this millennium , he will be etched in stone with a gold medal , a hero , and a President of the United States who won the battle , the war of 2020 .
He is Donald Trump .
God bless.
” See the “ Message @ @ @ @ @ @ @


welovetrump--2020-05-11--Ginsburg Writes UNANIMOUS Supreme Court Opinion Overturning the 9th Circuit In Illegal Immigration C


welovetrump--2020-05-11--#ObamaGate: John Durham Moves “Full-Throttle” on Russian Probe Review, Top Fed Prosecutors Involved

Every day , it appears that more and more evidence is released that undermines the origins of the Russia probe .
First , newly unveiled FBI documents showed that General Flynn was `` set up '' and that dirty FBI agents were TRYING to get him to lie .
Then over 50 pages of material were declassified by the House , showing that James Clapper claimed he never briefed Obama on Flynn-Russia phone calls .
Former FBI Director James Comey claimed that it was Clapper himself who briefed Obama .
Now , it appears that there 's even more evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Russia probe .
Per Fox News : U.S. Attorney for Connecticut John Durham is going “ full throttle ” with his review into the origins of the investigation into suspected Russia-Trump coordination in the 2016 election , with additional top prosecutors involved in looking at different components of the original probe , sources told Fox News .
Two sources told Fox News that Jeff Jensen , the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri who was tapped by the Justice Department in February to review the case of former National @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to help with Durham ’ s investigation even after the DOJ ’ s move last week to drop the case against Flynn .
The sources told Fox News that interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Timothy Shea is also assisting with components of the investigation .
“ They farmed the investigation out because it is too much for Durham and he didn ’ t want to be distracted , ” one of the sources told Fox News .
“ He ’ s going full throttle , and they ’ re looking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fox News .
The Justice Department declined to comment on Jensen and Shea ’ s involvement .
Any indication that Durham could be building a case against anyone involved in the original Russia probe , however , is sure to inflame tensions between the Trump administration and congressional Democrats -- who already are ramping up accusations that these Justice Department reviews have become politicized .
They slammed Attorney General Bill Barr for the DOJ ’ s decision Thursday to drop the Flynn case .
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler , D-N.Y. , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's impeachment proceedings , called the decision “ outrageous . ''
vThe retired Army lieutenant general for months has been trying to withdraw his plea , aided by a new attorney aggressively challenging the prosecution ’ s case and conduct .
Breadcrumbs were being dropped in the days preceding the decision that his case could be reconsidered .
Documents unsealed the prior week by the Justice Department revealed agents discussed their motivations for interviewing him in the Russia probe – questioning whether they wanted to `` get him to lie '' so he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get him to admit wrongdoing .
Flynn allies howled over the revelations , arguing that he essentially had been set up in a perjury trap .
In that interview , Flynn did not admit wrongdoing and instead was accused of lying about his contacts with the then-Russian ambassador – to which he pleaded guilty .
Jensen reportedly was the one who recommended dropping the case to Barr .
President Trump promised to drain the swamp , and if this new report is any indication , the swamp has a massive reckoning coming its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and impeachments attempts have not damaged President Trump .
Rather , they 've only deepened political divisions and have exposed corruption at the highest levels of government .

Every day, it appears that more and more evidence is released that undermines the origins of the Russia probe.
First, newly unveiled FBI documents showed that General Flynn was "set up" and that dirty FBI agents were TRYING to get him to lie.
Then over 50 pages of material were declassified by the House, showing that James Clapper claimed he never briefed Obama on Flynn-Russia phone calls.
The problem?
Former FBI Director James Comey claimed that it was Clapper himself who briefed Obama.
Andrew McCabe confirmed Comey's statements in his recently published book.
Now, it appears that there's even more evidence for John Durham to review in regards to the Russia probe. Per Fox News:
U.S. Attorney for Connecticut John Durham is going “full throttle” with his review into the origins of the investigation into suspected Russia-Trump coordination in the 2016 election, with additional top prosecutors involved in looking at different components of the original probe, sources told Fox News.
Two sources told Fox News that Jeff Jensen, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri who was tapped by the Justice Department in February to review the case of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, is continuing to help with Durham’s investigation even after the DOJ’s move last week to drop the case against Flynn.
The sources told Fox News that interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Timothy Shea is also assisting with components of the investigation.
“They farmed the investigation out because it is too much for Durham and he didn’t want to be distracted,” one of the sources told Fox News.
“He’s going full throttle, and they’re looking at everything,” the source told Fox News.
The Justice Department declined to comment on Jensen and Shea’s involvement.
Any indication that Durham could be building a case against anyone involved in the original Russia probe, however, is sure to inflame tensions between the Trump administration and congressional Democrats -- who already are ramping up accusations that these Justice Department reviews have become politicized. They slammed Attorney General Bill Barr for the DOJ’s decision Thursday to drop the Flynn case.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., who was a key figure during Trump's impeachment proceedings, called the decision “outrageous."
vThe retired Army lieutenant general for months has been trying to withdraw his plea, aided by a new attorney aggressively challenging the prosecution’s case and conduct.
Breadcrumbs were being dropped in the days preceding the decision that his case could be reconsidered. Documents unsealed the prior week by the Justice Department revealed agents discussed their motivations for interviewing him in the Russia probe – questioning whether they wanted to "get him to lie" so he'd be fired or prosecuted, or get him to admit wrongdoing. Flynn allies howled over the revelations, arguing that he essentially had been set up in a perjury trap. In that interview, Flynn did not admit wrongdoing and instead was accused of lying about his contacts with the then-Russian ambassador – to which he pleaded guilty.
Jensen reportedly was the one who recommended dropping the case to Barr.
President Trump promised to drain the swamp, and if this new report is any indication, the swamp has a massive reckoning coming its way!
Divisive investigations, witchhunts, and impeachments attempts have not damaged President Trump.
Rather, they've only deepened political divisions and have exposed corruption at the highest levels of government.


welovetrump--2020-05-11--Newly Declassified Evidence Suggests James Clapper Lied to Congress About Briefing Obama On Flynn’s

Newly Declassified Evidence Suggests James Clapper Lied to Congress About Briefing Obama On Flynn’s Phone Calls

It looks like the dropped charges against General Michael Flynn were just the beginning !
Every day , more and more information comes out about just how corrupt the swamp truly is !
On Thursday , the House Intelligence Committee released over 50 pages of never-before-seen documents from its Russia investigation .
The House Intelligence Committee on Thursday released thousands of pages of transcripts from more than 50 of its closed-door interviews from the panel 's two-year Russia investigation in 2017 and 2018 .
The transcripts posted online Thursday , along with some of the committee 's correspondence , marked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election interference that was marred by partisan infighting , setting the stage for an even bigger fight over the Ukraine impeachment inquiry , led by House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff , a California Democrat .
Clapper , who was director of national intelligence in the Obama administration , told the committee in July 2017 that while there had been concerns about anecdotal evidence of meetings between Trump 's team and Russian officials , he had seen no direct evidence the Trump campaign was plotting with the Russian government .
`` I never saw @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election , '' Clapper said .
`` That 's not to say that there were n't concerns about the evidence we were seeing , anecdotal evidence .
… But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence of the content of these meetings .
It 's just the frequency and prevalence of them was of concern . ''
Clapper explained he had a `` visceral reaction '' to the number of meetings that members of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including Flynn 's contacts during the transition that prompted his initial guilty plea to the special counsel for lying to the FBI in 2017 .
Did you catch that ?
Clapper told the House Intelligence Committee that he had no direct evidence of these meetings .
Presumably , if he had no evidence , then he would not have had to brief Obama on the meetings .
After all… if there were no meetings or no evidence of meetings , then there would have been nothing to brief Obama on .
However , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the one who briefed Obama about the Flynn phone calls !
This is what led to the `` pivotal Oval Office metting about the matter '' between Obama , Susan Rice , Comey , and Sally Yates .
So which was it ?
Did James Clapper NOT brief Obama like he claims ?
Or did Clapper lie , as suggested by Comey ?
It was Comey who claimed Clapper briefed Obama on Flynn 's phone calls !

It looks like the dropped charges against General Michael Flynn were just the beginning!
Every day, more and more information comes out about just how corrupt the swamp truly is!
On Thursday, the House Intelligence Committee released over 50 pages of never-before-seen documents from its Russia investigation.
CNN confirms the release of newly declassified evidence:
The House Intelligence Committee on Thursday released thousands of pages of transcripts from more than 50 of its closed-door interviews from the panel's two-year Russia investigation in 2017 and 2018. The transcripts posted online Thursday, along with some of the committee's correspondence, marked another endpoint to an investigation into Russian election interference that was marred by partisan infighting, setting the stage for an even bigger fight over the Ukraine impeachment inquiry, led by House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat. […] Clapper, who was director of national intelligence in the Obama administration, told the committee in July 2017 that while there had been concerns about anecdotal evidence of meetings between Trump's team and Russian officials, he had seen no direct evidence the Trump campaign was plotting with the Russian government. "I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election," Clapper said. "That's not to say that there weren't concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. … But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence of the content of these meetings. It's just the frequency and prevalence of them was of concern." Clapper explained he had a "visceral reaction" to the number of meetings that members of the Trump campaign were having with Russians, including Flynn's contacts during the transition that prompted his initial guilty plea to the special counsel for lying to the FBI in 2017.
Did you catch that?
Clapper told the House Intelligence Committee that he had no direct evidence of these meetings.
Presumably, if he had no evidence, then he would not have had to brief Obama on the meetings.
After all… if there were no meetings or no evidence of meetings, then there would have been nothing to brief Obama on.
The Federalist confirms:
“Did you ever brief President Obama on the phone call, the Flynn-Kislyak phone calls?” Rooney asked. “No,” Clapper replied.
However, James Comey himself testified that Clapper was the one who briefed Obama about the Flynn phone calls!
This is what led to the "pivotal Oval Office metting about the matter" between Obama, Susan Rice, Comey, and Sally Yates.
So which was it?
Did James Clapper NOT brief Obama like he claims?
Or did Clapper lie, as suggested by Comey? It was Comey who claimed Clapper briefed Obama on Flynn's phone calls!


welovetrump--2020-05-11--Rashawn Smith Arrested for Setting Up FAKE Facebook Page in Support of Ahmaud Arbery’s Two Killers t

Rashawn Smith Arrested for Setting Up FAKE Facebook Page in Support of Ahmaud Arbery’s Two Killers to Threaten Protesters

As though the Ahmaud Arbery case didn ’ t need more gasoline thrown on the fire… The Georgia Burea of @ @ @ @ @ they arrested Rashawn Smith , 20 , for creating a fake Facebook page in support @ @ @ @ @ two killers .
Smith is accused of “ dissemination of information relating to terroristic acts.
@ @ @ @ @ a fake Facebook support page , Smith has also been accused of using the page @ @ @ @ @ and threat messages against # BlackLivesMatter protesters .
There have already been many protests in @ @ @ @ @ more were planned in the future .
Smith used Facebook to send threats to those @ @ @ @ @ pro-Arbery events .
If the accusations against Smith are true , then he has made @ @ @ @ @ to be racist to presumably stoke racial tensions .

Oh boy…
As though the Ahmaud Arbery case didn’t need more gasoline thrown on the fire…
The Georgia Burea of Investigation announced on Sunday that they arrested Rashawn Smith, 20, for creating a fake Facebook page in support of Ahmaud Arbery’s two killers.
Smith is accused of “dissemination of information relating to terroristic acts.”
Aside from setting up a fake Facebook support page, Smith has also been accused of using the page to send out hate maile and threat messages against #BlackLivesMatter protesters.
Interestingly, Rashawn Smith is a young black man.
There have already been many protests in support of Ahmaud Arbery and more were planned in the future.
Smith used Facebook to send threats to those saying they would attend future pro-Arbery events.
If the accusations against Smith are true, then he has made the controversy worse by pretending to be racist to presumably stoke racial tensions.
More details below:


welovetrump--2020-05-12--Out for the Attack: Representative Lee Zeldin Calls for Schiff’s Resignation

This isn ’ t the first time Zeldin ’ s gone after Schiff .
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff , D-Calif. , is treating the American public like `` idiots '' by relying on hearsay and circumstantial evidence to impeach President Trump , Rep. Lee Zeldin , R-N.Y. , said Sunday on `` America 's News Headquarters . ''
`` The people who are pushing for impeachment have been pushing for impeachment since Donald Trump was elected -- since he was getting sworn into office , '' Zeldin told Fox News ' Eric Shawn .
`` Adam Schiff really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
`` If you remember March 22nd , 2017 , he goes on another network , and he says that he has more than circumstantial evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians .
This is evidence that he has n't yet produced , [ that ] I have n't seen , [ former Special Counsel Robert ] Mueller could n't find , '' he continued .
`` He made up what he called a parody version of the [ July 25 ] call transcript , but he only said that after he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attempted to clarify in September , `` Of course , the president never said , 'If you do n't understand me , I 'm going to say it seven more times . '
My point is , that 's the message that the Ukraine president was receiving in not so many words . ''
Zeldin also challenged Schiff for failing to disclose that his congressional team met in private with the whistleblower who sparked the impeachment inquiry .
The Republican also said the facts of the case remained on the president 's side @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Schiff 's ] team was in contact with the whistleblower before this person had even filed the whistleblower complaint or had even hired an attorney , '' he said .
`` He 's made claims during his opening statements and his closing statements -- trying to write the world 's greatest parody ... trying to connect dots that are n't actually connected , '' Zeldin added .
`` He 'll say something 's a firsthand truth that should n't be doubted and then you dig deeper and you realize it 's actually Ambassador @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Tim Morrison told him that [ Amb .
Gordon ] Sondland told Morrison -- the president told Sondland , give me a break ...
The facts are on the president 's side .
”

At least some politicians in Washington believe in accountability!
Representative Lee Zeldin is fighting for the resignation of Adam Schiff from the House Intelligence Committee. Documents from the secret impeachment hearings show that Schiff was living in a fantasy land and completely destroyed the Democrats’ case against the President for impeachment.
Naturally, Adam Schiff vigorously pushed to keep those documents from the hearings under wraps.
If Schiff did purposefully mislead the American public, he should be severely punished.
Read the details on calls for Schiff to be removed from the Washington Examiner:
Rep. Lee Zeldin demanded that Rep. Adam Schiff be stripped of his post as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and resign because of his role in the Russia investigation. “Adam Schiff should not be the chair of the House Intelligence Committee. His gavel should be removed. He should be censured. He should resign,” Zeldin said Monday on Fox News. “There’s a lot that should happen, but Nancy Pelosi isn’t going to punish Adam Schiff. In fact, that’s the reason why he has the gavel in the first place.” Republicans have been critical of Schiff in recent weeks after reports suggested that Schiff was trying to block the release of some of the transcripts of the investigation’s 53 witness interviews. Some of the transcripts were eventually released and undercut claims used by Democrats to push for impeachment. “He’s the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, which became the House Impeachment Committee because of the way he writes these fairy-tale parodies,” Zeldin said.
Watch Zeldin’s full appearance on Fox News here:


welovetrump--2020-05-12--New Questions Arise Regarding Mysterious Email Sent by Susan Rice on Flynn Case

The word amazing doesn ’ t even begin to sum up the case with Michael Flynn .
Here we have a decorated general who suffered financial and repetitional loss over years , all because FBI officials wanted to frame him as an anti-Trump tactic .
Thankfully , the DOJ has since dropped all charges from Flynn and he ’ s a free man again .
But in looking back at the reports from the Flynn case , heads are starting to turn toward Susan Rice .
On Trump ’ s inauguration day , Rice sent an email to herself regarding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The subject of the meeting ?
Why , the ongoing investigation of Trump campaign officials !
The email proves interesting because Rice appears to almost be reassuring herself that the Obama administration was playing everything by the books .
Did she perhaps send the email to herself because she knew at some point she ’ d have to explain herself and the administration ’ s actions ?
Fox News has the latest to report on Rice ’ s email : Russia probe files released as part of the Justice Department ’ s move @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Security Adviser Michael Flynn are raising new questions about a mysterious Inauguration Day email sent by Flynn ’ s predecessor in the Obama administration , Susan Rice .
An exhibit in the DOJ ’ s motion to dismiss the Flynn case last week detailed a special counsel interview of former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates .
The interview indicated outgoing President Barack Obama was aware of Flynn ’ s intercepted December 2016 phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition period .
The document noted Yates learned about the calls @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Oval Office meeting with Obama , Rice , then-FBI Director James Comey , then-CIA Director John Brennan , and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper .
After the briefing , Obama asked Yates and Comey to “ stay behind , ” and said he had “ learned of the information about Flynn ” and his conversation with Russia ’ s ambassador about sanctions .
Obama “ specified that he did not want any additional information on the matter , but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that point , the document said , “ Yates had no idea what the president was talking about , but figured it out based on the conversation .
Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act , but can ’ t recall if he specified there was an ‘ investigation.
’ Comey did not talk about prosecution in the meeting.
” This would eventually lead to Flynn being interviewed , amid supposed concern he had violated the obscure and never-successfully-enforced Logan Act , and later pleading guilty to lying to investigators about his Kislyak @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Oval Office meeting aligns with an email that Rice — on Jan. 20 , 2017 , the day President Trump was sworn into office — sent herself documenting Obama ’ s guidance , evidently in the same meeting , about how law enforcement should investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential race .
Rice ’ s office downplayed the significance of that email when it first surfaced in early 2018 , raising questions at the time from congressional Republicans .
A source close to the Senate Judiciary Committee told Fox News on Monday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a closer look at that email .
Take a look at what ’ s circulating on Twitter about Susan Rice :

The word amazing doesn’t even begin to sum up the case with Michael Flynn.
Here we have a decorated general who suffered financial and repetitional loss over years, all because FBI officials wanted to frame him as an anti-Trump tactic.
Thankfully, the DOJ has since dropped all charges from Flynn and he’s a free man again.
But in looking back at the reports from the Flynn case, heads are starting to turn toward Susan Rice. On Trump’s inauguration day, Rice sent an email to herself regarding a meeting earlier in the month.
The subject of the meeting? Why, the ongoing investigation of Trump campaign officials!
The email proves interesting because Rice appears to almost be reassuring herself that the Obama administration was playing everything by the books. Did she perhaps send the email to herself because she knew at some point she’d have to explain herself and the administration’s actions?
Fox News has the latest to report on Rice’s email:
Russia probe files released as part of the Justice Department's move to drop its case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn are raising new questions about a mysterious Inauguration Day email sent by Flynn's predecessor in the Obama administration, Susan Rice. An exhibit in the DOJ's motion to dismiss the Flynn case last week detailed a special counsel interview of former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates. The interview indicated outgoing President Barack Obama was aware of Flynn’s intercepted December 2016 phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition period. The document noted Yates learned about the calls during a Jan 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting with Obama, Rice, then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. After the briefing, Obama asked Yates and Comey to "stay behind," and said he had "learned of the information about Flynn" and his conversation with Russia's ambassador about sanctions. Obama "specified that he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information.” At that point, the document said, "Yates had no idea what the president was talking about, but figured it out based on the conversation. Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act, but can't recall if he specified there was an 'investigation.' Comey did not talk about prosecution in the meeting.” This would eventually lead to Flynn being interviewed, amid supposed concern he had violated the obscure and never-successfully-enforced Logan Act, and later pleading guilty to lying to investigators about his Kislyak talks. But the mention of that Oval Office meeting aligns with an email that Rice — on Jan. 20, 2017, the day President Trump was sworn into office — sent herself documenting Obama’s guidance, evidently in the same meeting, about how law enforcement should investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential race. Rice's office downplayed the significance of that email when it first surfaced in early 2018, raising questions at the time from congressional Republicans. A source close to the Senate Judiciary Committee told Fox News on Monday that GOP Senate investigators are now taking a closer look at that email.
Take a look at what’s circulating on Twitter about Susan Rice: