welovetrump--2020-07-22--CA Gov. Newsom Sued By Parents Over Distance Learning Mandate

Although mass `` protests '' have been permitted in the state of California , the governor , Gavin Newsom has been imposing increasingly Draconian restrictions on just about every other aspect of citizens ' lives .
But a group of parents in CA are taking him to court over his in person schooling restrictions .
Nine California parents are suing the state over a plan announced by Gov .
Gavin Newsom last week that would keep most schools closed for the beginning of the coming school year .
The 35-page complaint alleges parents and children are being denied their right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ basic minimum education ” because of COVID-19 prevention measures that will continue distance learning for the vast majority of the state ’ s schoolchildren .
The suit also claims the guidelines violate the Equal Protection Clause by allowing certain schools , summer camps and childcare centers to remain open while forcing others to stay closed .
Newsom unveiled the new guidelines on Friday , which order public and private schools in counties on the state ’ s watch list to continue distance learning when the school year starts back up .
Schools can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ county remains off the state ’ s monitoring list for 14 consecutive days .
Currently , there are 34 counties on the state ’ s monitoring list which are home to more than 37 million Californians .
Harmeet Dhillon , the plaintiffs ’ attorney , said parents and elected school board leaders should be the ones driving decisions about whether to continue remote learning , return to in-person classes , or have some combination of the two .
“ The governor took that choice away , ” she said .
“ It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Dhillon and her nonprofit group Center for American Liberty have also challenged a number of Newsom ’ s early pandemic restrictions on churches , beaches , protests and other measures .
“ I frankly thought we were reaching the end of having to litigate these issues in the courts , ” she said .
But the San Francisco attorney and Republican Party official argues her group ’ s litigation strategy has worked .
“ In response to our lawsuits , the Governor of California and the state have , in some cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in other cases , unilaterally gone and changed their orders ” on churches , protests and certain businesses , Dhillon said .
The lawsuit argues distance learning adversely affects racial minorities , lower-income families , and special needs children . ''

In California: Riots Good. Church Bad. School Bad.
Although mass "protests" have been permitted in the state of California, the governor, Gavin Newsom has been imposing increasingly Draconian restrictions on just about every other aspect of citizens' lives.
But a group of parents in CA are taking him to court over his in person schooling restrictions.
From CAPRadio:
Nine California parents are suing the state over a plan announced by Gov. Gavin Newsom last week that would keep most schools closed for the beginning of the coming school year.
The 35-page complaint alleges parents and children are being denied their right under the California Constitution to a “basic minimum education” because of COVID-19 prevention measures that will continue distance learning for the vast majority of the state’s schoolchildren.
The suit also claims the guidelines violate the Equal Protection Clause by allowing certain schools, summer camps and childcare centers to remain open while forcing others to stay closed.
Newsom unveiled the new guidelines on Friday, which order public and private schools in counties on the state’s watch list to continue distance learning when the school year starts back up. Schools can welcome students back to campus when their county remains off the state’s monitoring list for 14 consecutive days.
Currently, there are 34 counties on the state’s monitoring list which are home to more than 37 million Californians.
Harmeet Dhillon, the plaintiffs’ attorney, said parents and elected school board leaders should be the ones driving decisions about whether to continue remote learning, return to in-person classes, or have some combination of the two.
“The governor took that choice away,” she said. “It’s devastating and it must be stopped.”
Dhillon and her nonprofit group Center for American Liberty have also challenged a number of Newsom’s early pandemic restrictions on churches, beaches, protests and other measures.
“I frankly thought we were reaching the end of having to litigate these issues in the courts,” she said.
But the San Francisco attorney and Republican Party official argues her group’s litigation strategy has worked.
“In response to our lawsuits, the Governor of California and the state have, in some cases worked with us, [and] in other cases, unilaterally gone and changed their orders” on churches, protests and certain businesses, Dhillon said.
The lawsuit argues distance learning adversely affects racial minorities, lower-income families, and special needs children."


welovetrump--2020-07-22--Don Lemon: “The Availability Of Guns” Biggest Problem In Crime Ridden Cities

Leftist personalities on TV never miss a chance to conflate lawful gun ownership with illegal gun activities in our communities .
Don Lemon , stalwart of all things absurd , and his sidekick , Chris Cuomo , did n't miss their chance to do so last night .
From our friends at Fox News : CNN anchor Don Lemon suggested Tuesday night that the `` availability of guns '' is what has contributed to the rise in Chicago crime .
Chicago has witnessed an alarming increase in shootings and homicides in recent weeks , including Tuesday night 's shootout at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 14 injured , according to police .
The Trump administration has also repeatedly clashed with Chicago Democrat Mayor Lori Lightfoot , who has slammed the White House for offering to send the feds to quell the violence .
During the nightly handoff with `` Cuomo Prime Time '' anchor Chris Cuomo , Lemon expressed gratitude that crime in Chicago is being discussed but warned that political motivations could be behind it .
`` I 'm glad that people are starting to pay attention to crime , especially in cities like Chicago .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it in a year where they can use it as a political cudgel to hurt someone and try to help someone else , '' Lemon said .
`` Listen , there 's spikes in crime and there 's real work that needs to be done , right ?
Needs to be fixed .
I lived in Chicago for a while .
Every night when I lived in Chicago , there was a crime story , a shooting story .
I 've been doing stories about crime at this network for so long .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to it but it 's been an issue for a long time .
And do you know one of the biggest issues is ?
The availability of guns .
And you wo n't hear that from some people . ''

Leftist personalities on TV never miss a chance to conflate lawful gun ownership with illegal gun activities in our communities.
Don Lemon, stalwart of all things absurd, and his sidekick, Chris Cuomo, didn't miss their chance to do so last night.
From our friends at Fox News:
CNN anchor Don Lemon suggested Tuesday night that the "availability of guns" is what has contributed to the rise in Chicago crime. Trending: Updated Clinton Kill List: The List of People “Who Mysteriously Died” After Being Associates With The Clintons Chicago has witnessed an alarming increase in shootings and homicides in recent weeks, including Tuesday night's shootout at a funeral home that left at least 14 injured, according to police. The Trump administration has also repeatedly clashed with Chicago Democrat Mayor Lori Lightfoot, who has slammed the White House for offering to send the feds to quell the violence. During the nightly handoff with "Cuomo Prime Time" anchor Chris Cuomo, Lemon expressed gratitude that crime in Chicago is being discussed but warned that political motivations could be behind it. "I'm glad that people are starting to pay attention to crime, especially in cities like Chicago. But it is sad that they're doing it in a year where they can use it as a political cudgel to hurt someone and try to help someone else," Lemon said. "Listen, there's spikes in crime and there's real work that needs to be done, right? Needs to be fixed. I lived in Chicago for a while. Every night when I lived in Chicago, there was a crime story, a shooting story. I've been doing stories about crime at this network for so long. I'm glad people are paying attention to it but it's been an issue for a long time. And do you know one of the biggest issues is? The availability of guns. And you won't hear that from some people."


welovetrump--2020-07-22--Marco Rubio: “China’s Houston Consulate Is A Massive Spy Center”

President Trump has been saying for years that China spies and China Lies .
They are our greatest existential threat that both parties have been coddling for decades as they plot our destruction .
Now the Trump Administration has closed down its consulate in Houston .
Our friends at Fox News reports that according to Senator Marco Rubio , the Houston location was part of a massive Chinese espionage operation : Sen. Marco Rubio , R-Fla. , tweeted his support Wednesday for the shuttering of a Chinese consulate in Houston , claiming that spying activity was carried out through the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the consulate on Tuesday .
The Chinese government said Wednesday morning that they had been instructed to do so without warning , but Rubio claims the move was `` long overdue . ''
`` # China ’ s Houston consulate is a massive spy center , forcing it to close is long overdue , '' he said , describing it as a `` central node '' of the Chinese Communist Party 's spy operations .
`` This needed to happen , '' he tweeted .
China called the closure an “ unprecedented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threatened to retaliate , according to the South China Morning Post .
“ China demands the U.S. revoke the wrong decision .
If the U.S. went ahead , China would take necessary countermeasures , ” said Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin .
State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus said in a statement to Fox News that the closure directive was issued `` to protect American intellectual property and Americans ' private information.
” The U.S. `` will not tolerate the PRC ’ s violations of our sovereignty and intimidation of our people , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PRC ’ s unfair trade practices , theft of American jobs , and other egregious behavior , '' she added .
`` President Trump insists on fairness and reciprocity in U.S.-China relations . ''

President Trump has been saying for years that China spies and China Lies.
They are our greatest existential threat that both parties have been coddling for decades as they plot our destruction.
Now the Trump Administration has closed down its consulate in Houston.
Our friends at Fox News reports that according to Senator Marco Rubio, the Houston location was part of a massive Chinese espionage operation:
Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., tweeted his support Wednesday for the shuttering of a Chinese consulate in Houston, claiming that spying activity was carried out through the facility. The U.S. directed the closure of the consulate on Tuesday. The Chinese government said Wednesday morning that they had been instructed to do so without warning, but Rubio claims the move was "long overdue." "#China’s Houston consulate is a massive spy center, forcing it to close is long overdue," he said, describing it as a "central node" of the Chinese Communist Party's spy operations. "This needed to happen," he tweeted. China called the closure an “unprecedented escalation" by the United States and threatened to retaliate, according to the South China Morning Post. “China demands the U.S. revoke the wrong decision. If the U.S. went ahead, China would take necessary countermeasures,” said Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin. State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus said in a statement to Fox News that the closure directive was issued "to protect American intellectual property and Americans' private information.” The U.S. "will not tolerate the PRC’s violations of our sovereignty and intimidation of our people, just as we have not tolerated the PRC’s unfair trade practices, theft of American jobs, and other egregious behavior," she added. "President Trump insists on fairness and reciprocity in U.S.-China relations."


welovetrump--2020-07-22--NFL To Allow “Victims of Police Brutality” & “Systemic Racism” Helmet Decals

Since the death of George Floyd , the NFL has decided our nation 's anthem is n't good enough , so they will play `` The Black National Anthem '' along with it .
Then they backtrack on the kneeling controversy .
Now they are considering allowing players to put decals on their helmets against `` police brutality '' and `` systemic racism . ''
The NFL is reportedly considering allowing players to wear `` decals on helmets or patches on jerseys '' in honor of victims of systemic racism and police brutality , according to Jason Reid of The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ produce educational programs about victims , among other plans . ''
NFL.com noted that if the decal idea was approved by the players and the league , `` a player could wear a helmet decal with ' G.F . '
for George Floyd , whose death in May while in Minneapolis police custody has sparked a global reckoning over police brutality and racial prejudice . ''
Reid also reported that the league is expected to play `` Lift Ev'ry Voice And Sing '' before the playing of `` The Star-Spangled Banner '' at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has traditionally been considered the Black national anthem .
The NFL announced earlier in June it would be committing $ 250 million over the next 10 years to combat systemic racism and support social justice causes and charities .
NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell acknowledged that the league 's response to many of those issues in recent years should have been better and that the league should have listened more to its players .
That came in response to a video produced by a number of star players demanding changes around the league .
@

Since the death of George Floyd, the NFL has decided our nation's anthem isn't good enough, so they will play "The Black National Anthem" along with it.
Then they backtrack on the kneeling controversy.
Now they are considering allowing players to put decals on their helmets against "police brutality" and "systemic racism."
From Bleacher Report:
The NFL is reportedly considering allowing players to wear "decals on helmets or patches on jerseys" in honor of victims of systemic racism and police brutality, according to Jason Reid of The Undefeated. The league may also "produce educational programs about victims, among other plans." NFL.com noted that if the decal idea was approved by the players and the league, "a player could wear a helmet decal with 'G.F.' for George Floyd, whose death in May while in Minneapolis police custody has sparked a global reckoning over police brutality and racial prejudice." Reid also reported that the league is expected to play "Lift Ev'ry Voice And Sing" before the playing of "The Star-Spangled Banner" at the start of games. The song has traditionally been considered the Black national anthem. The NFL announced earlier in June it would be committing $250 million over the next 10 years to combat systemic racism and support social justice causes and charities. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell acknowledged that the league's response to many of those issues in recent years should have been better and that the league should have listened more to its players. That came in response to a video produced by a number of star players demanding changes around the league."


welovetrump--2020-07-22--Pelosi: Trump Will Be “Fumigated” Out Of Office

Pelosi 's noxious comments are just the newest additions to a completely unfounded Left Wing Conspiracy Theory that President Trump wo n't leave office .
One of the oddest things about our political moment is that President Trump regularly says and does things in the open that are easily criticized , and yet his opponents still manufacture wild conspiracy theories about him .
To my mind the dumbest theory currently being floated is the idea that if Trump loses in 2020 , he simply will refuse to leave the White House .
To those pushing the theory , this is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prospect that we should all be very worried about and so we need to start preparing .
Asked by CNN 's Chris Cuomo for his political predictions , Bill Maher declared , `` One of those things ... that I 've been talking about for years now , almost three years , that a lot of people are talking about now , is that if [ Trump ] loses ... he wo n't go . ''
He said , `` We have to worry about that . ''
It would be easy to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only being advanced by an unfunny comedian , but it actually keeps coming up .
Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen testified that he 's worried there wo n't be a `` peaceful transition of power '' if Trump loses .
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi warned the New York Times that Trump wo n't accept defeat unless he 's beaten by a large enough margin .
`` We have to inoculate against that , we have to be prepared for that , '' she said .
There 's also been a flood of articles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump loses but refuses to leave the White House ?
We have to start to contemplate the possibility , '' read an op-ed in the New York Daily News .
The Washington Monthly published a `` step-by-step guide '' under the title , `` How Trump Could Lose the Election and Remain President . ''
There was , it should be said , a similar conspiracy theory involving President George W. Bush canceling the 2008 election in the name of the war on terror .
This even inspired some fan fiction in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future under the headline , `` Bush Postpones 2008 Election . ''
But the anti-Trump conspiracy has gained more traction , and is being floated by more prominent figures ( though in Pelosi 's case , it 's likely more of a cynical calculation given that promoting the conspiracy is helpful to voter turnout efforts ) .
In reality , there is simply no reason to have a legitimate fear about Trump somehow refusing to go .
Sure , it 's difficult to see a scenario in which he 's a gracious loser @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to claim widespread fraud , lash out at the fake news media , Robert Mueller , and vent in all sorts of ways .
But there 's no reason to believe he 'd somehow refuse to leave the White House , or that he 'd successfully remain as president were he to do so .
Trump 's presidency has provided plenty of examples of him making bombastic statements about fake news being the `` enemy of the people '' and threatening or contemplating all sorts of actions .
But he does n't typically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bashing , he is not jailing journalists , or actually revisiting libel laws — something he has routinely floated rhetorically .
For all his attacks on the Mueller `` witch hunt , '' he never took the step of firing the special counsel , even though he could have done so .
Yes , he 's taken many executive actions , including ones that I 've criticized him for .
But when he 's been slapped down by courts , while he 's bashed the judges , he has n't simply routinely ignored @ @ @ @ @ @ @ argue that he does n't deserve praise for simply not jailing journalists .
But the point is that refusing to leave the White House after losing the election would follow a pattern of behavior of a president who is willing to jail journalists and routinely ignore court orders , not somebody who likes to pop off on Twitter . ''

Pelosi's noxious comments are just the newest additions to a completely unfounded Left Wing Conspiracy Theory that President Trump won't leave office.
From The Washington Examiner:
One of the oddest things about our political moment is that President Trump regularly says and does things in the open that are easily criticized, and yet his opponents still manufacture wild conspiracy theories about him. To my mind the dumbest theory currently being floated is the idea that if Trump loses in 2020, he simply will refuse to leave the White House. To those pushing the theory, this is all a very real and super serious prospect that we should all be very worried about and so we need to start preparing.
Asked by CNN's Chris Cuomo for his political predictions, Bill Maher declared, "One of those things ... that I've been talking about for years now, almost three years, that a lot of people are talking about now, is that if [Trump] loses ... he won't go."
He said, "We have to worry about that."
It would be easy to dismiss this if the conspiracy theory were only being advanced by an unfunny comedian, but it actually keeps coming up.
Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen testified that he's worried there won't be a "peaceful transition of power" if Trump loses. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi warned the New York Times that Trump won't accept defeat unless he's beaten by a large enough margin. "We have to inoculate against that, we have to be prepared for that," she said.
There's also been a flood of articles entertaining this possibility.
"What if Trump loses but refuses to leave the White House? We have to start to contemplate the possibility," read an op-ed in the New York Daily News. The Washington Monthly published a "step-by-step guide" under the title, "How Trump Could Lose the Election and Remain President."
There was, it should be said, a similar conspiracy theory involving President George W. Bush canceling the 2008 election in the name of the war on terror. This even inspired some fan fiction in the Nation imagining a news article from the future under the headline, "Bush Postpones 2008 Election."
But the anti-Trump conspiracy has gained more traction, and is being floated by more prominent figures (though in Pelosi's case, it's likely more of a cynical calculation given that promoting the conspiracy is helpful to voter turnout efforts).
In reality, there is simply no reason to have a legitimate fear about Trump somehow refusing to go.
Sure, it's difficult to see a scenario in which he's a gracious loser. He'd likely take to Twitter to claim widespread fraud, lash out at the fake news media, Robert Mueller, and vent in all sorts of ways. But there's no reason to believe he'd somehow refuse to leave the White House, or that he'd successfully remain as president were he to do so.
Trump's presidency has provided plenty of examples of him making bombastic statements about fake news being the "enemy of the people" and threatening or contemplating all sorts of actions. But he doesn't typically follow through.
For all his media bashing, he is not jailing journalists, or actually revisiting libel laws — something he has routinely floated rhetorically. For all his attacks on the Mueller "witch hunt," he never took the step of firing the special counsel, even though he could have done so. Yes, he's taken many executive actions, including ones that I've criticized him for. But when he's been slapped down by courts, while he's bashed the judges, he hasn't simply routinely ignored court orders.
Sure, one could argue that he doesn't deserve praise for simply not jailing journalists. But the point is that refusing to leave the White House after losing the election would follow a pattern of behavior of a president who is willing to jail journalists and routinely ignore court orders, not somebody who likes to pop off on Twitter."


welovetrump--2020-07-22--Diamond & Silk: “Mayor Lightfoot Needs To Resign!”

Pro MAGA sisters , Diamond & Silk have been staunch supporters of the President for many years .
They are @ @ @ @ @ mob of the Left .
Now they are taking aim at inept mayors like Chicago @ @ @ @

Pro MAGA sisters, Diamond & Silk have been staunch supporters of the President for many years.
They are prominent African-American voices against the mob of the Left.
Now they are taking aim at inept mayors like Chicago's Lori Lightfoot.


welovetrump--2020-07-22--Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf Votes Against Defund The Police Measure

Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf has sent clear message to the vandals who defaced her home with `` Defund The Police '' graffiti .
Although she has voiced support for the BLM movement , she cast the deciding vote against defunding her police department .
In a late night vote Tuesday , the Oakland City Council were deadlocked on whether to slash millions from the police budget with Mayor Libby Schaaf casting the deciding vote , hours after vandals sent her a message loud and clear .
The City Council meeting began at 1:30 Tuesday afternoon and the vote was taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police reform is a must , but there was major disagreement over slashing roughly $ 150 million from the police department ’ s budget .
The issue of police funding in Oakland has been growing increasingly contentious .
In fact , there is heated disagreement over how much money the city council ’ s June 23 budget agreement actually cut from the Oakland Police Department .
Some will say that number is a bit more than $ 2 million while others argue the figure is $ 14 million .
Amid that level of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were pushing for a budget amendment that would bring more cuts .
“ There will be a reduction in OPD spending by about $ 11.5 million , ” said former mayoral candidate and co-founder of the Anti Police-Terror Project Cat Brooks , before Tuesday night ’ s vote .
“ It ’ s the most significant reduction in spending that we ’ ve ever seen in Oakland history.
” “ We ’ re talking about taking dollars away from things police do not need to do , ” Brooks said earlier .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mental health .
They do not need to respond to traffic stops .
They do not need to respond to interpersonal violence , they do not need to respond to issues of substance-abuse treatment.
” Tuesday ’ s vote was the latest push for defunding Oakland Police , but this time with a more concerted pushback .
“ We had another murder again last night , three murders over the weekend making it four since just Friday , ” said Oakland Police Officers Association President Barry Donelan .
“ A more than 20 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” “ You know , adding resources to things like mental health and homelessness are all positive , ” Donelan said .
“ But the idea of taking it from the police department that is already strapped , dealing with those issues in public safety as it is , just seems foolhardy .
”

Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf has sent clear message to the vandals who defaced her home with "Defund The Police" graffiti.
Although she has voiced support for the BLM movement, she cast the deciding vote against defunding her police department.
From Bay Area CBS affiliate, KPIX5:
In a late night vote Tuesday, the Oakland City Council were deadlocked on whether to slash millions from the police budget with Mayor Libby Schaaf casting the deciding vote, hours after vandals sent her a message loud and clear.
The City Council meeting began at 1:30 Tuesday afternoon and the vote was taken just before 11 p.m. Council members agreed police reform is a must, but there was major disagreement over slashing roughly $150 million from the police department’s budget.
Related: Oakland Police Investigating Vandalism Attack On Mayor Libby Schaaf’s Home
The issue of police funding in Oakland has been growing increasingly contentious. In fact, there is heated disagreement over how much money the city council’s June 23 budget agreement actually cut from the Oakland Police Department.
Some will say that number is a bit more than $2 million while others argue the figure is $14 million. Amid that level of disagreement, two Oakland City Council members were pushing for a budget amendment that would bring more cuts.
“There will be a reduction in OPD spending by about $11.5 million,” said former mayoral candidate and co-founder of the Anti Police-Terror Project Cat Brooks, before Tuesday night’s vote. “It’s the most significant reduction in spending that we’ve ever seen in Oakland history.”
“We’re talking about taking dollars away from things police do not need to do,” Brooks said earlier. “Police do not bother to respond to mental health. They do not need to respond to traffic stops. They do not need to respond to interpersonal violence, they do not need to respond to issues of substance-abuse treatment.”
Tuesday’s vote was the latest push for defunding Oakland Police, but this time with a more concerted pushback.
“We had another murder again last night, three murders over the weekend making it four since just Friday,” said Oakland Police Officers Association President Barry Donelan. “A more than 20 percent increase in murders and shootings combined.”
“You know, adding resources to things like mental health and homelessness are all positive,” Donelan said. “But the idea of taking it from the police department that is already strapped, dealing with those issues in public safety as it is, just seems foolhardy.”


welovetrump--2020-07-22--Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Criticized on Twitter for Saying She Won’t Allow Trump to Send in Troop

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Criticized on Twitter for Saying She Won’t Allow Trump to Send in Troops to “Terrorize” Her Residents

After a frenzied 24 hours during which Mayor Lori Lightfoot threatened to sue if President Donald Trump tried to send federal agents into Chicago without her permission , she acknowledged Tuesday that the city would be working with federal agents to fight crime but warned that her administration would be vigilant against abuses of power .
Lightfoot changed her tone after talking with U.S. Attorney John Lausch , a former colleague who she has said she respects and admires , who assured her an influx of law enforcement would be working “ collaboratively ” with Chicago cops against violent crime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at this point ” won ’ t resemble the situation playing out in Portland , Oregon , where unidentified federal agents wearing camouflage uniforms have been denounced by local leaders for their actions , Lightfoot said at an unrelated news conference .
Instead , Lightfoot said she expects Chicago will receive resources that will plug into existing federal agencies that already work with the city , including the FBI , Drug Enforcement Administration and the Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco , Firearms and Explosives .
Still , Lightfoot was careful not to put @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and an administration with which she ’ s had a mostly adversarial relationship since she took office last year .
“ I don ’ t put anything past this administration , which is why we will continue to be diligent and why we will continue to be ready , ” Lightfoot said .
“ If we need to stop them and use the courts to do so , we are ready to do that.
” For Lightfoot , the prospect of increased federal assistance for anti-crime efforts is a thorny proposition .
More @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s skyrocketing violence , but the unfolding controversy in Portland and Trump ’ s repeated harsh rhetoric toward Chicago has led to high public mistrust in the federal government .
The announcement about federal agents coming to Chicago is the latest development in an ongoing war of words between the Republican president and Democratic mayor .
Last month , Trump lashed out at Lightfoot and Illinois Gov .
J.B. Pritzker over Chicago ’ s gun violence , saying the two had put their “ own political interests ” ahead of the lives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and order ” was needed .
Lightfoot , who has ripped Trump , his daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law Jared Kushner , responded with a statement saying she doesn ’ t “ need leadership lessons ” from the president and accused him of using victims of gun violence to try to score “ cheap political points.
” In recent weeks , Lightfoot repeatedly has questioned the sincerity of Trump ’ s offer to help Chicago and denounced his response to George Floyd ’ s killing by a Minneapolis police officer .
“ What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump … begins with F and it ends with U , ” she said in May after Floyd was killed .
On Monday , the Tribune reported that the Department of Homeland Security is crafting plans to deploy about 150 federal agents to the city this week .

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot's statements about federal law enforcement agents' presence in Portland are "devoid of any fact or truth," acting U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Mark Morgan stated Wednesday.
In an interview on "Fox & Friends," Morgan said he would "completely dismiss" Lightfoot's Tuesday claims the administration was acting unconstitutionally in the Oregon city, accusing the federal agencies of "authoritarianism."
"Well, first of all, I completely dismiss her reference [to] what's happening in Portland. Those are misinformed, irresponsible and reckless statements," he asserted. "And, they're just devoid of any fact or truth."
"Again, our presence in Portland is to respond to violent criminals who are willfully, knowingly, with intent, attacking federal property and the federal law enforcement that's there to defend that property. Hard stop on that," Morgan stated.
However, many warn Lightfoot has cause for concern when it comes to the presence of federal agents in the city. President Trump has insisted they are necessary to protect government assets in the city, but local officials and citizens are denouncing the use of often unidentified officers using military tactics.
In a Tuesday interview on "The Story," acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf said his agents were "having to go out and proactively arrest individuals" after now more than 50 days of protests, citing the destruction of federal property and attacks on officers.
"Attacking federal police officers and law enforcement officers which they have done for 52 nights in a row is a federal crime. And so the department, because we don't have that local support, that local law enforcement support, we are having to go out and proactively arrest individuals," he told host Martha MacCallum.
On Tuesday, Lightfoot tweeted that "under no circumstances" would she "allow Donald Trump’s troops to come to Chicago and terrorize [her] residents."
But that same night bullets flew once again on the mayor's streets outside a South Side funeral home, a shocking fusillade of gunfire that left at least 15 people wounded.


welovetrump--2020-07-24--Manhattan Judge Rules To Unseal Epstein/Maxwell Docs

As Ghislaine Maxwell sits in a federal detention center in Brooklyn , New York , facing allegations that she conspired with the late Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse three minor girls , her attorney is vowing an emergency appeal of a federal judge 's decision Thursday to make public a cache of sealed court documents from a civil lawsuit against Maxwell that was settled three years ago .
Citing `` great concerns '' about Maxwell 's ability to get a fair trial if the records are released , Maxwell 's lawyer , Laura Menninger , asked for a delay of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ruling .
The judge gave her one week .
`` We are in a vastly different position , '' now that Maxwell has been criminally charged , Menninger said , `` and certainly have great concerns about our client 's ability to seek and receive an impartial and fair trial and jury , given the intense media scrutiny around anything that is unsealed , '' she said .
MORE : Ghislaine Maxwell 's lawyers want a court order to muzzle prosecutors and lawyers for accusers The court filings in the case -- @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Roberts Giuffre against Maxwell in 2015 -- are said to contain the names of hundreds of people , some famous and some not , who socialized , traveled or worked with Epstein over the span of more than a decade .
The late financier has previously been linked to a coterie of high-profile business leaders , scientists , royalty and politicians , including former President Bill Clinton and current President Donald Trump .
Senior U.S. District Court Judge Loretta Preska ruled Thursday during a remote court hearing that the public is legally entitled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the case , including transcripts and excerpts from depositions of Maxwell and Giuffre .
Maxwell 's lawyers had previously argued to keep those records under seal .
`` This series of pleadings concerns [ Giuffre 's ] attempt to compel Ms. Maxwell to answer intrusive questions about her sex life , '' Maxwell 's attorney , Jeffrey Pagliuca , wrote last month .
`` The subject matter of these [ documents ] is extremely personal , confidential , and subject to considerable abuse by the media . ''
In her ruling Thursday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had failed to raise objections sufficient to overcome the presumption of public access to judicial documents .
`` In the context of this case , especially its allegations of sex trafficking of young girls , '' Preska said , `` the Court finds that any minor embarrassment or annoyance resulting from disclosure of Ms. Maxwell 's mostly non-testimony about behavior that has been widely reported in the press is far outweighed by the presumption of public access . ''
`` The sealed testimony or summaries may inappropriately influence potential witnesses or alleged victims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But Preska rejected those arguments , too .
`` Ms. Maxwell has not explained how this sealed material , if released , could , as she posits , 'inappropriately influence potential witnesses or victims , ' '' Preska said .
`` Again , the Court finds that this interest is entitled to little weight under the facts of this case . ''
Among the items Preska ordered unsealed are transcripts and excerpts from at least one of Maxwell 's multi-hour depositions in the case , which Maxwell 's attorneys argued were given under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agreed to by both sides in the dispute , according to Maxwell 's court filing objecting to the records release .
Limited excerpts of those depositions were released last year . ''

Here's more from ABC:
As Ghislaine Maxwell sits in a federal detention center in Brooklyn, New York, facing allegations that she conspired with the late Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse three minor girls, her attorney is vowing an emergency appeal of a federal judge's decision Thursday to make public a cache of sealed court documents from a civil lawsuit against Maxwell that was settled three years ago.
Citing "great concerns" about Maxwell's ability to get a fair trial if the records are released, Maxwell's lawyer, Laura Menninger, asked for a delay of two weeks to file an appeal of the ruling. The judge gave her one week.
"We are in a vastly different position," now that Maxwell has been criminally charged, Menninger said, "and certainly have great concerns about our client's ability to seek and receive an impartial and fair trial and jury, given the intense media scrutiny around anything that is unsealed," she said.
MORE: Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers want a court order to muzzle prosecutors and lawyers for accusers
The court filings in the case -- a civil defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts Giuffre against Maxwell in 2015 -- are said to contain the names of hundreds of people, some famous and some not, who socialized, traveled or worked with Epstein over the span of more than a decade. The late financier has previously been linked to a coterie of high-profile business leaders, scientists, royalty and politicians, including former President Bill Clinton and current President Donald Trump.
Senior U.S. District Court Judge Loretta Preska ruled Thursday during a remote court hearing that the public is legally entitled to access dozens of previously sealed records of the case, including transcripts and excerpts from depositions of Maxwell and Giuffre. Maxwell's lawyers had previously argued to keep those records under seal.
"This series of pleadings concerns [Giuffre's] attempt to compel Ms. Maxwell to answer intrusive questions about her sex life," Maxwell's attorney, Jeffrey Pagliuca, wrote last month. "The subject matter of these [documents] is extremely personal, confidential, and subject to considerable abuse by the media."
In her ruling Thursday, Preska said that Maxwell's team had failed to raise objections sufficient to overcome the presumption of public access to judicial documents.
"In the context of this case, especially its allegations of sex trafficking of young girls," Preska said, "the Court finds that any minor embarrassment or annoyance resulting from disclosure of Ms. Maxwell's mostly non-testimony about behavior that has been widely reported in the press is far outweighed by the presumption of public access."
"The sealed testimony or summaries may inappropriately influence potential witnesses or alleged victims," Pagliuca wrote last month.
But Preska rejected those arguments, too.
"Ms. Maxwell has not explained how this sealed material, if released, could, as she posits, 'inappropriately influence potential witnesses or victims,'" Preska said. "Again, the Court finds that this interest is entitled to little weight under the facts of this case."
Among the items Preska ordered unsealed are transcripts and excerpts from at least one of Maxwell's multi-hour depositions in the case, which Maxwell's attorneys argued were given under an expectation of confidentiality that had been agreed to by both sides in the dispute, according to Maxwell's court filing objecting to the records release. Limited excerpts of those depositions were released last year."


welovetrump--2020-07-23--Viral Photo Shows BLM Supporter Kneeling On The Neck Of Helpless White Baby

We 've all seen the footage of a Minneapolis police officer kneeling on George Floyd 's neck .
But how many of us have seen BLM supporter , Isaiah Jackson , kneeling on the neck of a crying white baby while a currently unknown accomplice holds the child 's arms back ?
From our friends at Fox News : An Ohio man who was out on parole has been thrown in jail and awaits new felony charges after a photo circulated on social media showing him posing with his knee to the neck of a crying , White 2-year-old boy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Clark County Sheriff ’ s Office first became aware of the photo circulating social media on Tuesday and appears to be a direct reference to the former Minnesota cop , Derek Chauvin , who leaned on the neck of George Floyd before he died , sparking months of protests and unrest across the U.S .
The photo shows a man , who has since been identified as 20-year-old Isaiah Jackson , with his knee on the neck of a crying white toddler who is only wearing a diaper .
Another person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his back .
The banner across the photo read : “ Blm now mf . ''
Patrol units were able to determine the location where the incident took place and made contact with both the mother and the child , as well as the male subject seen kneeling in the image , the Clark County Sheriff ’ s Office said in an update on Facebook Thursday .
The relationship between Jackson and the child 's mother is unknown .
Jackson , a parole authority holder from the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incarcerated in the Clark County Jail .
He is waiting for the county prosecutor “ to provide a determination on the scope and breadth of the felony charges that will be supported by that office for presentation in court , ” according to the sheriff ’ s office .
The child , who has not been identified by authorities , was taken to a local hospital for examination , where he was found to have no injuries related to the incident .
The sheriff 's office said the mother , who also has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ she was unaware of the photo having been taken , or its contents , until she had been informed by other parties while the Sheriff 's Office was enroute to her home to begin the investigation into this incident.
” The investigation is ongoing . ''

We've all seen the footage of a Minneapolis police officer kneeling on George Floyd's neck.
But how many of us have seen BLM supporter, Isaiah Jackson, kneeling on the neck of a crying white baby while a currently unknown accomplice holds the child's arms back?
From our friends at Fox News:
An Ohio man who was out on parole has been thrown in jail and awaits new felony charges after a photo circulated on social media showing him posing with his knee to the neck of a crying, White 2-year-old boy alongside a message referencing Black Lives Matter.
The Clark County Sheriff’s Office first became aware of the photo circulating social media on Tuesday and appears to be a direct reference to the former Minnesota cop, Derek Chauvin, who leaned on the neck of George Floyd before he died, sparking months of protests and unrest across the U.S.
The photo shows a man, who has since been identified as 20-year-old Isaiah Jackson, with his knee on the neck of a crying white toddler who is only wearing a diaper. Another person holds the child’s hands behind his back. The banner across the photo read: “Blm now mf."
Patrol units were able to determine the location where the incident took place and made contact with both the mother and the child, as well as the male subject seen kneeling in the image, the Clark County Sheriff’s Office said in an update on Facebook Thursday. The relationship between Jackson and the child's mother is unknown.
Jackson, a parole authority holder from the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, was taken into custody and remains incarcerated in the Clark County Jail. He is waiting for the county prosecutor “to provide a determination on the scope and breadth of the felony charges that will be supported by that office for presentation in court,” according to the sheriff’s office.
The child, who has not been identified by authorities, was taken to a local hospital for examination, where he was found to have no injuries related to the incident.
The sheriff's office said the mother, who also has not been identified, told deputies that “she was unaware of the photo having been taken, or its contents, until she had been informed by other parties while the Sheriff's Office was enroute to her home to begin the investigation into this incident.” The investigation is ongoing."


welovetrump--2020-07-23--Chinese Reportedly Hiding Fugitive Scientist In SF Consulate

A researcher who lied about her affiliation with a Chinese military university entered the Chinese consulate in San Francisco after being interviewed by the FBI on June 20 about alleged visa fraud and has remained there , according to an FBI assessment in court filings dated July 20 .
Why it matters : Using a diplomatic facility to shelter someone charged with a federal crime could cause serious tension between the U.S. and China , especially as the U.S. is seeking to crack down on Chinese espionage and research theft .
`` It is highly unusual for a Chinese diplomatic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suspect in an intellectual property theft-related case , '' said Minyao Wang , a New York-based lawyer who has worked on IP theft cases related to China .
`` Sheltering a defendant in a criminal case by using the diplomatic immunity of a consular building , if true , is really extraordinary . ''
Context : On July 21 , the U.S. told China that it must close its Houston consulate within 72 hours .
State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus said the move was intended to `` protect American intellectual property and American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : According to documents filed on July 20 in the San Francisco division of the U.S. district court for the Northern District of California , Tang Juan came to the U.S. on a J-1 visa and was a researcher at the University of California , Davis .
On her visa application , Tang stated that she did not have any affiliation with the People 's Liberation Army ( PLA ) , the Chinese military .
But an investigation revealed that she worked at the Air Force Military Medical University ( FMMU ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she is considered to be active military personnel .
After obtaining a warrant , the FBI searched her home and found evidence of her affiliation with the PLA .
On June 26 , Tang was charged with visa fraud .
Tang appears to have taken refuge inside the San Francisco consulate .
Federal prosecutors wrote that `` at some point following the search and interview of Tang on June 20 , 2020 , Tang went to the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco , where the FBI assesses she has remained , '' according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tang case demonstrates , the Chinese consulate in San Francisco provides a potential safe harbor for a PLA official intent on avoiding prosecution in the United States , '' prosecutors stated .
What they 're saying : `` We made the Chinese government aware that she is a charged individual , so it unquestionable that they know the defendant is a fugitive from Justice , '' a Department of Justice official told Axios .
The Chinese embassy in Washington , DC and the Chinese consulate in San Francisco did not respond to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ declined to comment .
The big picture : Federal prosecutors believe this is n't an isolated case .
Tang 's case is listed among several similar recent ones that appear `` to be part of a program conducted by the PLA — and specifically , FMMU or associated institutions—to send military scientists to the United States on false pretenses with false covers or false statements about their true employment , '' the court filing states .
At least one among this group of cases involved a military scientist who had allegedly been directed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a U.S. institution .
In other cases , the Chinese government directed military scientists to destroy evidence , and had helped them leave the U.S , according to court filings .

And from Axios:
A researcher who lied about her affiliation with a Chinese military university entered the Chinese consulate in San Francisco after being interviewed by the FBI on June 20 about alleged visa fraud and has remained there, according to an FBI assessment in court filings dated July 20.
Why it matters: Using a diplomatic facility to shelter someone charged with a federal crime could cause serious tension between the U.S. and China, especially as the U.S. is seeking to crack down on Chinese espionage and research theft.
"It is highly unusual for a Chinese diplomatic post to associate so closely with a suspect in an intellectual property theft-related case," said Minyao Wang, a New York-based lawyer who has worked on IP theft cases related to China.
"Sheltering a defendant in a criminal case by using the diplomatic immunity of a consular building, if true, is really extraordinary."
Context: On July 21, the U.S. told China that it must close its Houston consulate within 72 hours.
State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus said the move was intended to "protect American intellectual property and American’s private information."
Details: According to documents filed on July 20 in the San Francisco division of the U.S. district court for the Northern District of California, Tang Juan came to the U.S. on a J-1 visa and was a researcher at the University of California, Davis.
On her visa application, Tang stated that she did not have any affiliation with the People's Liberation Army (PLA), the Chinese military.
But an investigation revealed that she worked at the Air Force Military Medical University (FMMU), a PLA-affiliated university in China, and she is considered to be active military personnel.
After obtaining a warrant, the FBI searched her home and found evidence of her affiliation with the PLA.
On June 26, Tang was charged with visa fraud.
Tang appears to have taken refuge inside the San Francisco consulate.
Federal prosecutors wrote that "at some point following the search and interview of Tang on June 20, 2020, Tang went to the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco, where the FBI assesses she has remained," according to court filings.
"As the Tang case demonstrates, the Chinese consulate in San Francisco provides a potential safe harbor for a PLA official intent on avoiding prosecution in the United States," prosecutors stated.
What they're saying: "We made the Chinese government aware that she is a charged individual, so it unquestionable that they know the defendant is a fugitive from Justice," a Department of Justice official told Axios.
The Chinese embassy in Washington, DC and the Chinese consulate in San Francisco did not respond to a request for comment.
The State Department declined to comment.
The big picture: Federal prosecutors believe this isn't an isolated case.
Tang's case is listed among several similar recent ones that appear "to be part of a program conducted by the PLA — and specifically, FMMU or associated institutions—to send military scientists to the United States on false pretenses with false covers or false statements about their true employment," the court filing states.
At least one among this group of cases involved a military scientist who had allegedly been directed by military superiors to steal information from a U.S. institution.
In other cases, the Chinese government directed military scientists to destroy evidence, and had helped them leave the U.S, according to court filings.


welovetrump--2020-07-23--Prosecutor’s Office May Have Tampered With McCloskey Evidence

Most Constitutionally minded Americans have viewed the case of the McCloskey couple for what it really is .
A politically driven persecution of Law Abiding Citizens and an affront on the 2nd Amendment .
Now it is being reported that the handgun that was seized by local authorities may have been tampered with by the Prosecutor .
The handgun held by Patricia McCloskey at her home in the Central West End was not capable of firing when seized by police , according to a document obtained by News 4 .
It ’ s a new development in the case against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their Central West End home last month .
And it ’ s one that legal experts say raises very serious questions about whether the entire case can proceed .
The document was sent to News 4 anonymously , but it appears to be the lab report from the firearms analysis in the case .
According to the lab , it fired when tested .
But the gun Patricia McCloskey had , a small handgun , examiners say , could not be test-fired as submitted .
At the request of prosecutor Chris Hinkley , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stripped and found to have been assembled incorrectly .
It was then re-assembled properly , test fired and functioned as designed .
Charging documents said the gun was capable of lethal use .
“ It would be disheartening to learn , if accurate , that the authorities tampered with evidence in order to bring charges against an innocent member of the community , ” the McCloskey ’ s attorney Joel Schwartz said .
He declined to comment further .
A previous attorney for the McCloskey ’ s had indicated the gun had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it had been used as an exhibit in previous lawsuits .
That attorney , Al Watkins , had the gun in his possession for a short time , but turned it over to police .
”

Most Constitutionally minded Americans have viewed the case of the McCloskey couple for what it really is.
A politically driven persecution of Law Abiding Citizens and an affront on the 2nd Amendment.
Now it is being reported that the handgun that was seized by local authorities may have been tampered with by the Prosecutor.
FromKMOV4 in St. Louis:
The handgun held by Patricia McCloskey at her home in the Central West End was not capable of firing when seized by police, according to a document obtained by News 4. It’s a new development in the case against the local couple seen pointing guns outside their Central West End home last month. And it’s one that legal experts say raises very serious questions about whether the entire case can proceed. The document was sent to News 4 anonymously, but it appears to be the lab report from the firearms analysis in the case. According to the lab, it fired when tested. But the gun Patricia McCloskey had, a small handgun, examiners say, could not be test-fired as submitted. At the request of prosecutor Chris Hinkley, the report says, the firearm was stripped and found to have been assembled incorrectly. It was then re-assembled properly, test fired and functioned as designed. Charging documents said the gun was capable of lethal use. “It would be disheartening to learn, if accurate, that the authorities tampered with evidence in order to bring charges against an innocent member of the community,” the McCloskey’s attorney Joel Schwartz said. He declined to comment further. A previous attorney for the McCloskey’s had indicated the gun had been rendered inoperable long before the incident because it had been used as an exhibit in previous lawsuits. That attorney, Al Watkins, had the gun in his possession for a short time, but turned it over to police.”


welovetrump--2020-07-23--Joe Biden Calls Trump “1st Racist President”

If you do n't support Donald Trump you ai n't black !
Well , what about when Trump called Obama the first `` clean '' mainstream Black politician ?
Trending : Dixon Police Have Pictures of the Suspects In The Ronald Reagan Statue Vandalism Yet somehow , Joe Biden has the audacity to call Donald Trump `` The First Racist President . ''
Former Vice President Joe Biden on Wednesday called President Donald Trump the first racist president in U.S. history .
Speaking at a virtual town hall organized by the Service Employees International Union , Biden offered the assessment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a South Korean immigrant , detailed an experience she had being racially profiled at a supermarket and expressed concern over Trump ’ s coronavirus rhetoric , including referring to COVID-19 as the “ China virus.
” The presumptive 2020 Democratic presidential nominee said he was “ so angry ” after learning of her experience before criticizing Trump for “ his spreading of racism.
” “ The way he deals with people based on the color of their skin , their national origin , where they ’ re from , is absolutely sickening , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ president has ever done this , never , never , never.
” “ No Republican president has done this , this no Democratic president , ” he continued .
“ We ’ ve had racists and they ’ ve existed , they ’ ve tried to get elected president but he ’ s the first one that has .
And the way he pits people against one another is all designed to divide the country , divide people , not pull them together . ''

If you don't support Donald Trump you ain't black!
0, wait, Joe Biden said that.
Well, what about when Trump called Obama the first "clean" mainstream Black politician?
Sorry, Joe again.
Yet somehow, Joe Biden has the audacity to call Donald Trump "The First Racist President."
From CNBC:
Former Vice President Joe Biden on Wednesday called President Donald Trump the first racist president in U.S. history.
Speaking at a virtual town hall organized by the Service Employees International Union, Biden offered the assessment of the president after Suk Kim, a South Korean immigrant, detailed an experience she had being racially profiled at a supermarket and expressed concern over Trump’s coronavirus rhetoric, including referring to COVID-19 as the “China virus.”
The presumptive 2020 Democratic presidential nominee said he was “so angry” after learning of her experience before criticizing Trump for “his spreading of racism.”
“The way he deals with people based on the color of their skin, their national origin, where they’re from, is absolutely sickening,” Biden said. “No sitting president has ever done this, never, never, never.”
“No Republican president has done this, this no Democratic president,” he continued. “We’ve had racists and they’ve existed, they’ve tried to get elected president but he’s the first one that has. And the way he pits people against one another is all designed to divide the country, divide people, not pull them together."


welovetrump--2020-07-23--Rapper T.I. Calls For $44T In “Reparations”

The volitile racial tension in this country has had many side-effects in recent months .
One of them is the renewed push by Leftists to demand Reparations for Slavery .
While there are numbers floating all around , each bigger than the next , popular rapper T.I .
recently named his price tag .
Rapper T.I .
has put a heavy price tag on slavery reparations : $ 1 million for every descendant of slavery , equal up to $ 44 trillion .
Speaking with radio host Charlamagne tha God on “ The Breakfast Club , ” T.I .
outlined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people be represented equally across the board in the United States .
“ This is my goal , ” he said .
“ My goal is to get every black person in America that ’ s a descendant of slavery one million dollars , at least .
That take about $ 44 trillion .
So that ’ s my goal , so I ’ m working up on $ 44 trillion.
” “ Everything black people spend money on , it should be a black company that provides it , ” he continued @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 13 % of this nation ’ s population , we should make up for 13 % of the ownership of land .
We should be representing at least 13 % , 14 % on boards [ of ] financial institutions , and so on and so forth .
That should be persistent or consistent throughout , but it is not.
” The rapper did , however , say that black communities need to be exposed to more education so that children could have the option to dream about jobs beyond just entertainment , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other professions .
T.I .
said that white supremacists are becoming “ irate ” because they know their reign of power is over .
“ Your grandchildren are little brown babies , and society , nobody likes you , bro .
You take that little d**k energy , ” he continued .
“ Nobody likes you .
You ’ re not cool and fun and hip to be around .
You got no sauce , no drip , no flavor , it ’ s literally food with no flavor , so it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seeing that their grip is loosening , and it ’ s our time now.
” Earlier in the interview , T.I .
said that poverty , crime , mass incarceration , and drug addiction in black communities are the result of slavery . ''

The volitile racial tension in this country has had many side-effects in recent months.
One of them is the renewed push by Leftists to demand Reparations for Slavery.
While there are numbers floating all around, each bigger than the next, popular rapper T.I. recently named his price tag.
From The Daily Wire:
Rapper T.I. has put a heavy price tag on slavery reparations: $1 million for every descendant of slavery, equal up to $44 trillion.
Speaking with radio host Charlamagne tha God on “The Breakfast Club,” T.I. outlined his reparations goal and demanded that black people be represented equally across the board in the United States.
“This is my goal,” he said. “My goal is to get every black person in America that’s a descendant of slavery one million dollars, at least. That take about $44 trillion. So that’s my goal, so I’m working up on $44 trillion.”
“Everything black people spend money on, it should be a black company that provides it,” he continued. “If we make up for 13% of this nation’s population, we should make up for 13% of the ownership of land. We should be representing at least 13%, 14% on boards [of] financial institutions, and so on and so forth. That should be persistent or consistent throughout, but it is not.”
The rapper did, however, say that black communities need to be exposed to more education so that children could have the option to dream about jobs beyond just entertainment, such as sciences, tech, and other professions.
T.I. said that white supremacists are becoming “irate” because they know their reign of power is over.
“Your grandchildren are little brown babies, and society, nobody likes you, bro. You take that little d**k energy,” he continued. “Nobody likes you. You’re not cool and fun and hip to be around. You got no sauce, no drip, no flavor, it’s literally food with no flavor, so it’s up. … They’re seeing that their grip is loosening, and it’s our time now.”
Earlier in the interview, T.I. said that poverty, crime, mass incarceration, and drug addiction in black communities are the result of slavery."


welovetrump--2020-07-23--Washington Redskins Now Known As  “The Washington Football Team”

Nope , NFL team formerly known as “ The Washington Redskins , ” will henceforth be known simply as “ The Washington Football Team.
” Effective immediately , Washington will call itself the “ Washington Football Team ” pending the adoption of a new name , the NFL franchise announced Thursday .
This is not a final renaming and rebranding for the team ; this is the name it wants to use until the adoption of a new name at some point .
The team will continue the process of retiring the former name and hopes to be entirely rid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the next 50 days , by the Sept. 13 regular-season opener against the Philadelphia Eagles .
Washington will not have any change to its color scheme .
It will still use burgundy and gold , and the logo on the helmet will be replaced by each player ’ s number in gold .
The Washington Football Team will debut its home uniforms in Week 1 against the Eagles , and its road uniforms in Week 2 against the Arizona Cardinals .
While the Washington Football Team uses these uniforms and helmets for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seeking the feedback of players , alumni , fans , sponsors and the community for the team name it will use in the future .
Terry Bateman , the franchise ’ s new executive vice president and chief marketing officer , said the team wants to include fans , business partners and alumni in the process .
That takes time .
“ You ’ re doing a rebranding process that correctly takes 12 to 18 months .
If you want to do it right , you have to take a deep breath , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the process , ” he said .
“ We want to do it right , we want something thoughtful and inclusive and smart and bring a lot of points of views into this and come out the other side with something everyone is proud of and can rally behind .
“ It feels organic and natural to do this .
I love the look of what we ’ ve done .
It ’ s really strong .
I like the logo and the uniforms and the colors .
… There ’ s a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the next 50 days to do all this .
It ’ s a tremendous amount of work to go through this .
The new will go up and the old will go down .
”

DC Sentinels?
Capitol WOKEsters?
Nope, NFL team formerly known as “The Washington Redskins,” will henceforth be known simply as “The Washington Football Team.”
From ESPN:
Effective immediately, Washington will call itself the “Washington Football Team” pending the adoption of a new name, the NFL franchise announced Thursday.
This is not a final renaming and rebranding for the team; this is the name it wants to use until the adoption of a new name at some point.
The team will continue the process of retiring the former name and hopes to be entirely rid of it on physical and digital spaces in the next 50 days, by the Sept. 13 regular-season opener against the Philadelphia Eagles.
Washington will not have any change to its color scheme. It will still use burgundy and gold, and the logo on the helmet will be replaced by each player’s number in gold. The Washington Football Team will debut its home uniforms in Week 1 against the Eagles, and its road uniforms in Week 2 against the Arizona Cardinals.
While the Washington Football Team uses these uniforms and helmets for the 2020 season, it will be seeking the feedback of players, alumni, fans, sponsors and the community for the team name it will use in the future.
Terry Bateman, the franchise’s new executive vice president and chief marketing officer, said the team wants to include fans, business partners and alumni in the process. That takes time.
“You’re doing a rebranding process that correctly takes 12 to 18 months. If you want to do it right, you have to take a deep breath, take a step back and go through the process,” he said. “We want to do it right, we want something thoughtful and inclusive and smart and bring a lot of points of views into this and come out the other side with something everyone is proud of and can rally behind.
“It feels organic and natural to do this. I love the look of what we’ve done. It’s really strong. I like the logo and the uniforms and the colors. … There’s a tremendous amount of work to do for the next 50 days to do all this. It’s a tremendous amount of work to go through this. The new will go up and the old will go down.”


welovetrump--2020-07-23--Michael Cohen Released From Prison…Again

Michael Cohen will be released from prison in the coming days .
The former Trump lawyer was released earlier this summer into house arrest , due to fears over Covid-19 infecting inmates .
He was swiftly sent back after he was spotted out to dinner while on house arrest .
It is being reported that Cohen was asked to sign an agreement stating he would not work on a book he intends to write on his time working for President Trump , and now a judge has ruled that this was a violation of his 1st Amendment Rights , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prison .
Shortly before being taken into custody earlier this month , he had been posting on social media about his upcoming book , which is going to be critical of Trump .
During Thursday ’ s hearing , Hellerstein was highly skeptical of arguments by a federal prosecutor that Cohen was not locked up in retaliation for the book or that the book-related condition was not sought by officials for a specific reason in his case .
At one point , when another prosecutor tried to come to the aid of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s questions , Hellerstein angrily cut him off , reminding him of the rule that only one lawyer argued for each side in a case .
Hellerstein in ordering Cohen ’ s release , said that he found that “ the purpose of transferring Mr. Cohen from furlough and home confinement to jail is retaliatory , and it ’ s retaliatory because of his desire to exercise his First Amendment rights to publish a book and discuss anything about the book or anything else he wants on social media and others.
” Cohen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Otisville since his arrival there , will be released by 2 p.m. after being tested for the coronavirus and will be driven back to his home on Manhattan ’ s Upper East Side by his son , Hellerstein said .
After his release into home confinement , he will be subject to a number of restrictions on his movement , employment and contact with other people . ''

Michael Cohen will be released from prison in the coming days.
The former Trump lawyer was released earlier this summer into house arrest, due to fears over Covid-19 infecting inmates.
He was swiftly sent back after he was spotted out to dinner while on house arrest.
It is being reported that Cohen was asked to sign an agreement stating he would not work on a book he intends to write on his time working for President Trump, and now a judge has ruled that this was a violation of his 1st Amendment Rights, and he should be allowed back out of prison.
From CNBC:
Shortly before being taken into custody earlier this month, he had been posting on social media about his upcoming book, which is going to be critical of Trump. During Thursday’s hearing, Hellerstein was highly skeptical of arguments by a federal prosecutor that Cohen was not locked up in retaliation for the book or that the book-related condition was not sought by officials for a specific reason in his case. At one point, when another prosecutor tried to come to the aid of the prosecutor who was answering the judge’s questions, Hellerstein angrily cut him off, reminding him of the rule that only one lawyer argued for each side in a case. Hellerstein in ordering Cohen’s release, said that he found that “the purpose of transferring Mr. Cohen from furlough and home confinement to jail is retaliatory, and it’s retaliatory because of his desire to exercise his First Amendment rights to publish a book and discuss anything about the book or anything else he wants on social media and others.” Cohen, who has been in quarantine in Otisville since his arrival there, will be released by 2 p.m. after being tested for the coronavirus and will be driven back to his home on Manhattan’s Upper East Side by his son, Hellerstein said. After his release into home confinement, he will be subject to a number of restrictions on his movement, employment and contact with other people."


welovetrump--2020-07-23--Portland Mayor Joins Rioters, Gets Boo’d And Tear Gassed!

Portland Mayor , Ted Wheeler , wanted to show his city just how WOKE he is .
Instead of showing solidarity with the law enforcement getting attacked in his city on a nightly basis , he decided to join in with the rioters in front of Portland ’ s Federal Courthouse .
Much to his dismay , I ’ m sure , not only did his Antifa Bros boo him , he got a faceful of teargas from the Feds along with them .
From our friends at Fox News : A riot was declared in Portland just after midnight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s tense visit with protesters– where he was booed , told to resign , given a list of demands and tear-gassed by federal agents .
His visit ended with his security detail engaging in a struggle with protesters late Wednesday night as they worked to get the mayor to safety , a report said .
Earlier , he moved with protesters to the fence outside of the federal courthouse where he stood at the front and was tear-gassed along with the crowd , according to New York Times correspondent Mike Baker .
Wheeler @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” telling Baker he didn ’ t see anything in the crowd that warranted the reaction by federal officers .
“ This is not a de-escalation strategy , ” he said .
“ This is flat-out urban warfare and it ’ s being brought on this country by the president and it ’ s got to stop now.
” As Wheeler left , a few protesters following him tried to push against his security team once he had entered a building .
Others threw water bottles and other projectiles at the glass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s City Council passed new policies on Wednesday that immediately bans all police bureau members from working with federal law enforcement and prevents them from intentionally arresting or using force on journalists and legal observers .
”

Portland Mayor, Ted Wheeler, wanted to show his city just how WOKE he is.
Instead of showing solidarity with the law enforcement getting attacked in his city on a nightly basis, he decided to join in with the rioters in front of Portland’s Federal Courthouse.
Much to his dismay, I’m sure, not only did his Antifa Bros boo him, he got a faceful of teargas from the Feds along with them.
From our friends at Fox News:
A riot was declared in Portland just after midnight Thursday morning after Mayor Ted Wheeler’s tense visit with protesters– where he was booed, told to resign, given a list of demands and tear-gassed by federal agents. His visit ended with his security detail engaging in a struggle with protesters late Wednesday night as they worked to get the mayor to safety, a report said. Earlier, he moved with protesters to the fence outside of the federal courthouse where he stood at the front and was tear-gassed along with the crowd, according to New York Times correspondent Mike Baker. Wheeler called the tear-gassing an “egregious overreaction,” telling Baker he didn’t see anything in the crowd that warranted the reaction by federal officers. “This is not a de-escalation strategy,” he said. “This is flat-out urban warfare and it’s being brought on this country by the president and it’s got to stop now.” As Wheeler left, a few protesters following him tried to push against his security team once he had entered a building. Others threw water bottles and other projectiles at the glass door, according to Baker. Portland’s City Council passed new policies on Wednesday that immediately bans all police bureau members from working with federal law enforcement and prevents them from intentionally arresting or using force on journalists and legal observers.”


welovetrump--2020-07-23--Durham Report Bombshell! Joe DiGenova Says Durham “In Negotiations” For Plea Deals

It seems like no matter the evidence which is unearthed , no one is being held accountable for the crimes committed against the Trump Campaign , and subsequent frame job .
That ’ s why the upcoming report by US Attorney John Durham on the origins on the Russia Probe are so important .
And according to former US Attorney Joe DiGenova there could be some bombshells coming !
Joe DiGenova then dropped some huge news regarding the Durham investigation : DiGenova : I ’ m all for it .
I hope they [ Durham ] issue the report as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ occur thereafter .
I ’ m fascinated by the sequence but I ’ m delighted with what ’ s happening .
When the interviewer suggested that the report and the indictments might happen at the same time , diGenova replied : DiGenova : Of course , yes , that ’ s exactly what could happen .
You got it right Vince [ Coglianese ] .
I suspected all along that Durham was going to do his best to get something done by September .
Actually , I suspected it would be June , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time table but the COVID-19 virus put off some grand jury appearances .
And I do know that they are in negotiations with some people for some guilty pleas .
So it may very well be that some guilty pleas occur initially at the same time that the report is issued .
They may piggyback those together simultaneously .
”

It seems like no matter the evidence which is unearthed, no one is being held accountable for the crimes committed against the Trump Campaign, and subsequent frame job.
That’s why the upcoming report by US Attorney John Durham on the origins on the Russia Probe are so important.
And according to former US Attorney Joe DiGenova there could be some bombshells coming!
From The Patriots Report:
Joe DiGenova then dropped some huge news regarding the Durham investigation: DiGenova: I’m all for it. I hope they [Durham] issue the report as soon as possible and that criminal charges occur thereafter. I’m fascinated by the sequence but I’m delighted with what’s happening. When the interviewer suggested that the report and the indictments might happen at the same time, diGenova replied: DiGenova: Of course, yes, that’s exactly what could happen. You got it right Vince [Coglianese]. I suspected all along that Durham was going to do his best to get something done by September. Actually, I suspected it would be June, indeed I knew that that was the time table but the COVID-19 virus put off some grand jury appearances. And I do know that they are in negotiations with some people for some guilty pleas. So it may very well be that some guilty pleas occur initially at the same time that the report is issued. They may piggyback those together simultaneously.”


welovetrump--2020-07-25--Dr. Mask-less: Anthony Fauci Enjoys Nationals Game Mask Free

That 's right , Mr .
Shut Down America was neither social distancing nor wearing his life saving face mask .
White House coronavirus task force member Dr. Anthony Fauci on Friday defended himself from charges of hypocrisy after he was seen not wearing a mask or social distancing while watching baseball .
Fauci wore his mask on his chin in multiple images from Nationals Park stadium on Thursday after he threw out the opening pitch of the Yankees-Nationals game .
The infectious diseases expert , celebrated by President Trump ’ s critics for his willingness to fault the US @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between two other people in the virtually empty stadium .
But Fauci rejected social media criticism as “ mischievous ” in a Fox News interview .
“ I had my mask around my chin .
I had taken it down .
I was totally dehydrated and I was drinking water , trying to rehydrate myself , ” Fauci insisted .
“ And by the way , I was negative COVID literally the day before .
So I guess people want to make a big event .
I wear a mask all the time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pull it down to take some sips of water and put it back up again , I guess if people want to make something about that , they can .
But to me , I think that ’ s just mischievous.
” In one image , Fauci was seen with his mask on his chin grinning at a friend to his right .
In another image , Fauci looked straight ahead watching the game , with empty hands pointed toward the field .
Fauci ’ s mask-free spectating drew criticism from people who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on others .
“ Fauci is just giving us a preview of life under a Biden Administration : They ’ ll never subject themselves to rules they impose on the ‘ little people , ' ” tweeted Fox News host Laura Ingraham .
Podcast host Wayne Dupree wrote , “ Americans demand to know why Dr. Fauci doesn ’ t have to social distance or wear a mask after damning photo emerges .
”

That's right, Mr. Shut Down America was neither social distancing nor wearing his life saving face mask.
From The NYPost:
White House coronavirus task force member Dr. Anthony Fauci on Friday defended himself from charges of hypocrisy after he was seen not wearing a mask or social distancing while watching baseball.
Fauci wore his mask on his chin in multiple images from Nationals Park stadium on Thursday after he threw out the opening pitch of the Yankees-Nationals game. The infectious diseases expert, celebrated by President Trump’s critics for his willingness to fault the US pandemic response, was seen sandwiched shoulder-to-shoulder between two other people in the virtually empty stadium.
But Fauci rejected social media criticism as “mischievous” in a Fox News interview.
“I had my mask around my chin. I had taken it down. I was totally dehydrated and I was drinking water, trying to rehydrate myself,” Fauci insisted. “And by the way, I was negative COVID literally the day before. So I guess people want to make a big event. I wear a mask all the time when I’m outside. To pull it down to take some sips of water and put it back up again, I guess if people want to make something about that, they can. But to me, I think that’s just mischievous.”
In one image, Fauci was seen with his mask on his chin grinning at a friend to his right. In another image, Fauci looked straight ahead watching the game, with empty hands pointed toward the field.
Fauci’s mask-free spectating drew criticism from people who view him as eager to impose rules on others.
“Fauci is just giving us a preview of life under a Biden Administration: They’ll never subject themselves to rules they impose on the ‘little people,'” tweeted Fox News host Laura Ingraham.
Podcast host Wayne Dupree wrote, “Americans demand to know why Dr. Fauci doesn’t have to social distance or wear a mask after damning photo emerges.”


welovetrump--2020-07-25--SF Giants Pitcher Refuses To Kneel Before BLM: “I’m A Christian”

Professional sports teams and players across the country are submitting themselves before the altar of Black Lives Matter .
But one pitcher for the San Francisco Giants , Sam Coonrod , refused to bend his knee .
Gabe Kapler spent most of this week delivering powerful messages with his actions and his words , but inside the Giants ' clubhouse , the manager was crystal clear with his players .
They did not have to do anything with which they were uncomfortable .
They would not be viewed any differently if they chose to take a knee during the national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stand .
On Thursday night , before the season opener against the Dodgers , many of the Giants again chose to kneel during the anthem .
But it was a moment before that which really stood out .
Every player and coach from both teams took a knee before the anthem and held a long piece of black fabric in a moment of unity , with the exception of one .
The outlier was Sam Coonrod , a second-year Giants reliever who said after the game that he is a Christian and `` @ @ @ @ @ @ @ . ''
He also said he does not agree with some of what he has heard about the Black Lives Matter movement .
`` I 'm a Christian , like I said , and I just ca n't get on board with a couple of things that I have read about Black Lives Matter , '' Coonrod said .
`` How they lean toward Marxism and they 've said some negative things about the nuclear family .
I just ca n't get on board with that . ''
Coonrod said he did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including African-American outfielder Jaylin Davis , a leading voice in recent weeks , before the game because he did not know about the display until very late in the day , when a teammate informed him of what was going to happen .
Coonrod said he decided he could not kneel , and `` it was too late '' at that point to talk to anyone about the decision . ''

Professional sports teams and players across the country are submitting themselves before the altar of Black Lives Matter.
But one pitcher for the San Francisco Giants, Sam Coonrod, refused to bend his knee.
From NBC Sports:
Gabe Kapler spent most of this week delivering powerful messages with his actions and his words, but inside the Giants' clubhouse, the manager was crystal clear with his players.
They did not have to do anything with which they were uncomfortable. They would not be viewed any differently if they chose to take a knee during the national anthem, or if they chose to stand.
On Thursday night, before the season opener against the Dodgers, many of the Giants again chose to kneel during the anthem. But it was a moment before that which really stood out. Every player and coach from both teams took a knee before the anthem and held a long piece of black fabric in a moment of unity, with the exception of one.
The outlier was Sam Coonrod, a second-year Giants reliever who said after the game that he is a Christian and "can't kneel before anything besides God." He also said he does not agree with some of what he has heard about the Black Lives Matter movement.
"I'm a Christian, like I said, and I just can't get on board with a couple of things that I have read about Black Lives Matter," Coonrod said. "How they lean toward Marxism and they've said some negative things about the nuclear family. I just can't get on board with that."
Coonrod said he did not have a chance to talk to teammates, including African-American outfielder Jaylin Davis, a leading voice in recent weeks, before the game because he did not know about the display until very late in the day, when a teammate informed him of what was going to happen. Coonrod said he decided he could not kneel, and "it was too late" at that point to talk to anyone about the decision."


welovetrump--2020-07-24--The Washington Redskins Are Now Known As The “Washington Football Team”

It was only a matter of time before the Washington Redskins craved to the political correctness mob .
The NFL as a whole has already endorsed Black Lives Matter and now encourages kneeling during the anthem .
And now the Washington Redskins are officially no more .
Instead , the team will go by the completely uncreative name of “ The Washington Football Team.
” Here ’ s the details on the story from Fox News : The Washington NFL franchise is one step closer to forming a new identity after retiring its former name and logo earlier this month @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now go by the “ Washington Football Team.
” The name will serve as a placeholder until the franchise can decide on an official team name but the classic gold and burgundy color scheme will remain the same , according to an ESPN report .
The logo on the helmets will be replaced by player numbers as the team relies on the community and its players to pick a more permanent solution .
Terry Bateman was hired Monday as executive vice president and chief marketing officer to oversee the name change and re-branding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be able to purchase Washington Football Team merchandise as the franchise attempts to remove all traces of its former logo from physical and digital spaces by the season-opener against the Philadelphia Eagles on Sept. 13 , ESPN reported .
The franchise that began in Boston in 1932 had the name Redskins since 1933 .
Trouble for Washington began when the team faced mounting pressure to retire its former name and logo over the negative connotations associated with the symbol .
Shortly after majority owner Dan Snyder announced the name change , a bombshell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ several sexual harassment allegations leveled by 15 former female employees against the organization .
You can watch Coach Ron Rivera explain the ridiculous process right here :

It was only a matter of time before the Washington Redskins craved to the political correctness mob.
The NFL as a whole has already endorsed Black Lives Matter and now encourages kneeling during the anthem.
And now the Washington Redskins are officially no more.
Instead, the team will go by the completely uncreative name of “The Washington Football Team.”
Here’s the details on the story from Fox News:
The Washington NFL franchise is one step closer to forming a new identity after retiring its former name and logo earlier this month, announcing on Thursday that it will now go by the “Washington Football Team.” The name will serve as a placeholder until the franchise can decide on an official team name but the classic gold and burgundy color scheme will remain the same, according to an ESPN report. The logo on the helmets will be replaced by player numbers as the team relies on the community and its players to pick a more permanent solution. Terry Bateman was hired Monday as executive vice president and chief marketing officer to oversee the name change and re-branding process. For now, fans will be able to purchase Washington Football Team merchandise as the franchise attempts to remove all traces of its former logo from physical and digital spaces by the season-opener against the Philadelphia Eagles on Sept. 13, ESPN reported. The franchise that began in Boston in 1932 had the name Redskins since 1933. Trouble for Washington began when the team faced mounting pressure to retire its former name and logo over the negative connotations associated with the symbol. Shortly after majority owner Dan Snyder announced the name change, a bombshell Washington Post report was dropped that detailed several sexual harassment allegations leveled by 15 former female employees against the organization.
You can watch Coach Ron Rivera explain the ridiculous process right here:


welovetrump--2020-07-24--Report: India Shifts Nuclear Focus To China

The skirmishes between Indian and Chinese troops have been well documented over the summer .
But a new report suggests a more dramatic turn in the tense relations between the two Asian powers .
Breitbart News shares a report by The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists , which says India has refocused its Nuclear deterrents onto China : A recent analysis by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists suggests that India has recently refocused its nuclear strategy on China , positioning new missiles “ that indicate their primary target as China , ” India ’ s WION news outlet reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the non-profit ’ s study revealed that recent additions to India ’ s nuclear arsenal suggest that New Delhi ’ s defense focus has shifted from its traditional foe , fellow nuclear state Pakistan , to China .
“ India ’ s nuclear strategy , which has traditionally focused on Pakistan , now appears to place increased emphasis on China , and Beijing is now in range of Indian missiles , ” the study ’ s authors noted .
“ [ T ] he change in posture resulted in all-new Agni missiles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] having ranges that indicate their primary target as China.
” According to the analysis , India ’ s nuclear buildup represents an effort to combat China ’ s increasingly “ aggressive ” development of its own defensive forces following the deadliest military conflict between the two countries in at least 45 years last month .
On the night of June 15 , Indian and Chinese border regiments engaged in brutal hand-to-hand combat that killed 20 Indian soldiers .
The Indian army accuses Chinese forces of instigating the attack , describing it as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to officially acknowledge casualties during the incident , leaving the number of Chinese troops killed unknown , though Indian military sources estimate about 40 of China ’ s People ’ s Liberation Army soldiers died in the conflict .
Over the past several decades , the Asian neighbors have occasionally fought over their disputed border , engaging in a full-on war in 1962 .
The threat of nuclear retaliation by either country , both armed , has so far deterred the escalation of sporadic border skirmishes over the years .
Monday ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to take extra precautions following its most recent border conflict with China , reinforcing its defensive arsenal . ''

The skirmishes between Indian and Chinese troops have been well documented over the summer.
But a new report suggests a more dramatic turn in the tense relations between the two Asian powers.
Breitbart News shares a report by The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists ,which says India has refocused its Nuclear deterrents onto China:
A recent analysis by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists suggests that India has recently refocused its nuclear strategy on China, positioning new missiles “that indicate their primary target as China,” India’s WION news outlet reported on Wednesday. Published on July 20, the non-profit’s study revealed that recent additions to India’s nuclear arsenal suggest that New Delhi’s defense focus has shifted from its traditional foe, fellow nuclear state Pakistan, to China. “India’s nuclear strategy, which has traditionally focused on Pakistan, now appears to place increased emphasis on China, and Beijing is now in range of Indian missiles,” the study’s authors noted. “[T]he change in posture resulted in all-new Agni missiles [medium to intercontinental range ballistic missiles] having ranges that indicate their primary target as China.” According to the analysis, India’s nuclear buildup represents an effort to combat China’s increasingly “aggressive” development of its own defensive forces following the deadliest military conflict between the two countries in at least 45 years last month. On the night of June 15, Indian and Chinese border regiments engaged in brutal hand-to-hand combat that killed 20 Indian soldiers. The Indian army accuses Chinese forces of instigating the attack, describing it as an “ambush.” Beijing has refused to officially acknowledge casualties during the incident, leaving the number of Chinese troops killed unknown, though Indian military sources estimate about 40 of China’s People’s Liberation Army soldiers died in the conflict. Over the past several decades, the Asian neighbors have occasionally fought over their disputed border, engaging in a full-on war in 1962. The threat of nuclear retaliation by either country, both armed, has so far deterred the escalation of sporadic border skirmishes over the years. Monday’s nuclear analysis suggests that India has begun to take extra precautions following its most recent border conflict with China, reinforcing its defensive arsenal."