welovetrump--2020-12-15--Lin Wood AGAIN Asks President Trump To Declare Martial Law To Save Our Country!

This is an update to a story I brought you yesterday… .
So this apparently happened a few days ago but I never saw it .
I ’ m guessing you may not have either .
Attorney L. Lin Wood went on record saying if the Supreme Court won ’ t act , then President Trump should hold a new , fair and honest election under Military Law .
And wouldn ’ t it be FASCINATING to see how different the results could be ?
Lin Wood said this before the Texas case was declined by SCOTUS , so he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time .
And here we are .
He also apparently said the same thing on Newsmax in an interview .
So….what do you think ?
I am curious if you support this idea because it might be necessary .
Do 80 million Americans have Trump ’ s back on this one ?
Tap here to add your vote…..👇 NATIONAL POLL : Lin Wood Says President Trump Should Declare Martial Law and Hold a New Election If The Supreme Court Won ’ t Act…Do You Agree ?
Can ’ t wait to see how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to see the second Revolution in our country ?
Or maybe a second Civil War ?
One fought in the Media and online ?
We are with you Mr. President .
We will always have your back .
Do what ’ s right for America .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
11,068 views
This is an update to a story I brought you yesterday….
Here’s the latest from Lin Wood
Our Nation is at a crossroad. Are we a nation of laws or a nation of lawlessness? If US Supreme Court does not stay Electoral College, @realDonaldTrump is bound by his oath to do so by imposing partial martial law. President has duty to make certain our laws are faithfully executed. Trending: Updated Clinton Kill List: The List of People “Who Mysteriously Died” After Being Associates With The Clintons — LLinWood linwood Sunday, December 13, 2020
And here’s what I wrote yesterday:
So this apparently happened a few days ago but I never saw it.
I’m guessing you may not have either.
Attorney L. Lin Wood went on record saying if the Supreme Court won’t act, then President Trump should hold a new, fair and honest election under Military Law.
And wouldn’t it be FASCINATING to see how different the results could be?
Lin Wood said this before the Texas case was declined by SCOTUS, so he appears to have been ahead of his time.
And here we are.
Take a look:
https://twitter.com/RyanAFournier/status/1333848685592121361
BREAKING: Attorney Lin Wood Suggests President Trump DECLARE MARTIAL LAW to Hold New Election. What are your thoughts? — Joey Saladino Show FAN (@SaladinoShow) December 1, 2020
SHOTS FIRED! Lin Wood Urges President Trump to Declare Martial Law and Hold New Elections https://t.co/qvehGDBCyC — Matt Couch (@RealMattCouch) December 2, 2020
Here was Wood’s actual Tweet:
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1333788036815937537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1333788036815937537%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthedcpatriot.com%2Fshots-fired-lin-wood-urges-president-trump-to-declare-martial-law-and-hold-new-elections%2F
He also apparently said the same thing on Newsmax in an interview.
So….what do you think?
I am curious if you support this idea because it might be necessary.
Do 80 million Americans have Trump’s back on this one?
Tap here to add your vote…..👇
NATIONAL POLL: Lin Wood Says President Trump Should Declare Martial Law and Hold a New Election If The Supreme Court Won’t Act…Do You Agree?
Can’t wait to see how this turns out!
Are we about to see the second Revolution in our country?
Or maybe a second Civil War?
One fought in the Media and online?
We are with you Mr. President.
We will always have your back.
Do what’s right for America.
https://twitter.com/pam_sands/status/1333800239703023617


welovetrump--2020-12-15--Banned on Facebook:  Proud Boys Beat The Hell Out of ANTIFA

The far-left communist , Chinese-partnered , NAZI ’ s at Facebook have banned this video .
They don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ .
Which is a good enough reason for me to blast it everywhere !
Share @ @ @ @ @ Echo if you support the Proud Boys !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
51,489 views
The far-left communist, Chinese-partnered, NAZI’s at Facebook have banned this video.
They don’t want you to see it.
Which is a good enough reason for me to blast it everywhere!
Hope you enjoy:
Share if you enjoyed this!
Echo if you support the Proud Boys!


welovetrump--2020-12-15--Hank Kunneman: The Thumb Was The Sign!  Major Prophetic Update.

I know many of you ware wanting an update from what the prophetic voices are saying as we sit here on December 14 .
Well you don ’ t get any better than Hank Kunneman , and boy was he fired up this weekend !
I ’ ve listened to both the 9am message and the 11:30am message and they are on fire !
Here ’ s the quick summary : he ’ s not backing down one inch !
He says God is not paying attention to the enemies plans .
He is not paying attention to the Media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to what the electors do .
And he won ’ t even pay attention to the inauguration — if it gets that far .
Hank says the LORD has his own plan here and he is going to play it out the way he sees fit !
He then talks about the parallels to the Israelites and the Red Sea ( what I have been telling you for weeks ! )
He breaks it all down .
Spoiler alert : the wheels to the Egyptian Chariots are about to be knocked off very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was going to be a major sign of a turning point in the victory .
But he actually said that almost a year ago in a prophecy !
How true that has become !
In case you aren ’ t tracking , have you heard anything about THUMB-drives in the news recently ?
Prophecy….so accurate it ’ s better than your morning newspaper !
This is so good , I really encourage you to listen to the whole thing .
And here is the 11:30 am service where he goes even deeper and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t want to miss either of these !
NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Support President Trump ?
Here are some the comments from YouScared : Thank you Hank for your courage and your boldness !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
17,607 views
I know many of you ware wanting an update from what the prophetic voices are saying as we sit here on December 14.
Well you don’t get any better than Hank Kunneman, and boy was he fired up this weekend!
I’ve listened to both the 9am message and the 11:30am message and they are on fire!
Here’s the quick summary: he’s not backing down one inch!
He says God is not paying attention to the enemies plans.
He is not paying attention to the Media.
He’s not paying attention to what the electors do.
And he won’t even pay attention to the inauguration — if it gets that far.
Hank says the LORD has his own plan here and he is going to play it out the way he sees fit!
He then talks about the parallels to the Israelites and the Red Sea (what I have been telling you for weeks!)
He breaks it all down.
Spoiler alert: the wheels to the Egyptian Chariots are about to be knocked off very soon!
He also said the thumb was going to be a major sign of a turning point in the victory.
But he actually said that almost a year ago in a prophecy!
How true that has become!
In case you aren’t tracking, have you heard anything about THUMB-drives in the news recently?
Yup.
Prophecy….so accurate it’s better than your morning newspaper!
This is so good, I really encourage you to listen to the whole thing.
Enjoy
And here is the 11:30 am service where he goes even deeper and really lets loose!
You don’t want to miss either of these!
Here are some the comments from YouScared:
Thank you Hank for your courage and your boldness!
THIS is real preaching!


welovetrump--2020-12-15--A Special Second Amendment 1791 Dark Camo Hat For FREE

BOOKMARK IT : Check Out My New Site , NoahReport.com !
We need to institute universal background checks .
We @ @ @ @ @ weapons .
We need to ban high-capacity magazines .
This is a national emergency .
@ @ @ @ @ She even said she ’ d send police into homes to confiscate guns .

We need to institute universal background checks. We need to ban military-style assault weapons. We need to ban high-capacity magazines. This is a national emergency. We need to act.” She even said she’d send police into homes to confiscate guns.


welovetrump--2020-12-15--GOP Electors In All 7 Swing States Cast Votes For President Trump, Opening Way For a 12th Amendment

GOP Electors In All 7 Swing States Cast Votes For President Trump, Opening Way For a 12th Amendment Trump Victory!

A few weeks ago I brought you the story titled : Here ’ s What Happens Next If Trump REFUSES To Concede… .
( it ’ s happened twice before in history ) That article ( copied below ) explains exactly what happens if there is a dispute among the electors in the Electoral College .
GOP electors in 7 swing states just gave President Trump a wide open door to a win via the 12th Amendment .
And for those of you who say “ this isn ’ t real ” …..you ’ d be wrong .
Here is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ friends at The Gateway Pundit had even more details to confirm : The Electoral Count Act ( ECA ) of 1887 says each chamber of Congress will separately decide which slate of ‘ dueling electors ’ to accept .
The new congress that will be sworn in on January 3 will be the ones doing the count .
The Senate would vote for the Vice President .
Republicans currently hold the Senate .
The House of Representatives would choose the President however it is not one vote per lawmaker like it is in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state gets one vote and with the new Congress , Republicans will have the advantage with 27 of the state delegations – a candidate needs 26 votes to win the White House .
If the two chambers disagree , we could end up in uncharted territory , though experts typically say that electors approved by each state ’ s “ executive ” should prevail .
Want more details on how the 12th Amendment will work ?
Most people don ’ t have any idea that it even exists .
Ok folks , get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A friend of mine sent me this video and as I was watching I thought “ wait….that can ’ t be true.
” But the guy who sent it to me is very smart and he does his homework .
So I did some more digging and it looks like it IS true .
I actually read the 12th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and it ’ s all in there !
Have you ever read it ?
I bet 999 out of 1,000 people couldn ’ t even tell you what the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s in there and it ’ s real .
Watch this and prepare to have your mind blown : And in case that gets taken down , I have a backup on Rumble .
Here you go : Full Text of the 12th Amendment , from Law.Cornell.edu : The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President , one of whom , at least , shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves ; they shall name in their ballots the person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President , and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President , and of all persons voted for as Vice-President , and of the number of votes for each , which lists they shall sign and certify , and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States , directed to the President of the Senate ; –The President of the Senate shall , in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives , open all the certificates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; –the person having the greatest number of votes for President , shall be the President , if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed ; and if no person have such majority , then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President , the House of Representatives shall choose immediately , by ballot , the President .
But in choosing the President , the votes shall be taken by states , the representation from each state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states , and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice .
And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them , before the fourth day of March next following , then the Vice-President shall act as President , as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President .
The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed , and if no person have a majority , then from the two highest numbers on the list , the Senate shall choose the Vice-President ; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators , and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice .
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States .
The Twelfth Amendment ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Constitution provides the procedure for electing the president and vice president .
It replaced the procedure provided in Article II , Section 1 , Clause 3 , by which the Electoral College originally functioned .
The amendment was proposed by the Congress on December 9 , 1803 , and was ratified by the requisite three-fourths of state legislatures on June 15 , 1804 .
The new rules took effect for the 1804 presidential election and have governed all subsequent presidential elections .
Under the original rules of the Constitution , each member of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with no distinction made between electoral votes for president and electoral votes for vice president .
The presidential candidate receiving the greatest number of votes—provided that number equaled a majority of the electors—was elected president , while the presidential candidate receiving the second-most votes was elected vice president .
In cases where no individual won a vote from a majority of the electors , as well as in cases where multiple individuals won votes from a majority of electors but tied each other for the most votes , the House of Representatives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the president .
In cases where multiple candidates tied for the second-most votes , the Senate would hold a contingent election to select the vice president .
The first four presidential elections were conducted under these rules .
The experiences of the 1796 and 1800 presidential elections – showing that the original system caused the election of a President and Vice-President who were political opponents of each other , constantly acting at cross-purposes – spurred legislators to amend the presidential election process , requiring each member of the Electoral College to cast one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vote for vice president .
Under the new rules , a contingent election is still held by the House of Representatives if no candidate wins a presidential electoral vote from a majority of the electors , but there is no longer any possibility of multiple candidates winning presidential electoral votes from a majority of electors .
The Twelfth Amendment also lowered the number of candidates eligible to be selected by the House in a presidential contingent election from five to three , established that the Senate would hold a contingent election for vice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the vice presidential electoral vote , and provided that no individual constitutionally ineligible to the office of president would be eligible to serve as vice president .
Remember , President Trump has said he WON and he hasn ’ t backed down : Does this look like a many ready to concede ?
Congress will open and record the votes of the Electoral College in Washington , DC , on January 6 , 2021 .
But this time when , as per the 12th amendment of the US Constitution , “ the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives , open all the certificates , ” the procedure may not be a simple formality .
Because each house is controlled by a different party , each may approve their own list , or both houses may reject the electors from some states .
The legal framework is so vague that no one outcome can be certain .
In case of a tie , the 12th Amendment states that “ the House of Representatives shall choose immediately , by ballot , the President ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken by states , the representation from each state having one vote ” .
As things stand , this method of adding up state representations rather that the individual votes of the 435 representatives would give the Republicans a majority to reelect their candidate .
But everything hinges on the elections in the House and Senate , also on November 3 , since the final decision would be up to the members of the new Congress , to be installed on January 3 , 2021 .
Incidentally , the current Speaker of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unparalleled strategist who has already mapped the districts the Democrats must win on November 3 in order to have not only a seat majority but also a majority of blue states in the House of Representatives .
Here is even more on the history and working of the 12th Amendment , from the ConstitutionCenter.org : The Twelfth Amendment can not be understood outside of the Electoral College , which was set out in the 1787 Constitution as the mechanism by which Americans select their presidents .
There were four crucial aspects of that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ electors would vote for two persons ( at least one of whom had to be from outside the elector ’ s home state ) .
The second was that the electors did not differentiate between the two persons as potential presidents or vice presidents .
Electors should simply vote for the two persons they viewed as most qualified to become president .
The person gaining the most votes ( if a majority ) would become president .
The runner-up ( presumably the second-most-qualified person ) would become vice president .
The third assumption @ @ @ @ @ @ @ completely predictable ( and unanimous ) election of George Washington as our first president—would quite often fail to reach majority approval of a specific candidate ; in that case , according to the original Constitution , the decision would be made by the House of Representatives , with each state ’ s delegation having one vote .
The Constitution also provided that the House would choose in case of a tie vote between two candidates each of whom had received a majority of votes .
Finally , because the Constitution , until amended @ @ @ @ @ @ @ representatives would meet for the first time only a full year after election , the choice would be made by a House that would likely include a number of “ lame-ducks , ” including representatives who had been defeated in the recent elections .
All of these features were on display in 1801 .
The election of 1800 was one of the most important in American history and , arguably , even in world history , for it represented the first time that an incumbent leader was defeated in an election .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been Washington ’ s Vice President for two terms and was then elected in his own right in 1796 .
His Vice President was Thomas Jefferson .
This result reflects the desire of the Framers of 1787 to avoid development of political parties and focus indeed on some notion of “ best men.
” Any such hopes were quickly frustrated , however .
Even by 1796 , Adams was associated with the Federalist Party , while Jefferson was supported by the Democratic-Republican Party .
They ran against each other again in 1800 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ running mates , ” Charles Cotesworth Pinckney from South Carolina in the case of Adams ( and the Federalist Party ) and Aaron Burr of New York , for Jefferson .
The Federalist Party electors figured out that it was important not to cast both of their votes for Adams and Pinckney , for that would create a tie and , if both got a majority of the vote , throw the election into the House ; the Democratic-Republican electors were not so sagacious .
They dutifully cast both of their votes for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a tie majority vote that forced the House to choose between Jefferson and Burr .
The tie vote exposed deep problems in the 1787 system .
The one-state/one-vote rule had the practical effect of giving Delaware ’ s sole Representative Bayard , an ardent Federalist , the same voting power as Virginia , then the largest state ( and home , of course , of Jefferson ) .
And what if a state had an even number of representatives who split evening on their choice ?
In that case , the state ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Given that there were 16 states in the Union in 1801 , nine delegations had to agree on their choice .
Only on the 36th ballot did Bayard agree to vote for Jefferson and to break the deadlock ( by which time at least two Jeffersonian governors , from Pennsylvania and Virginia , were threatening to call out their state militias and order them to march on the new national capitol in Washington , D.C. ) .
Jefferson was peacefully inaugurated on March 4 , and the all-important precedent was set for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ original electoral college system was exposed as problematic , and there was widespread agreement that something had to be done .
But what ?
One possibility , obviously , was to adopt the suggestion of Pennsylvania ’ s James Wilson at the Philadelphia Convention that presidents be elected by a national popular vote .
That was rejected in 1787 and did not become a serious possibility in the early 19th century ( nor , of course , has it been adopted since then ) .
Still , it had become clear that political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ politics and that the electoral college system should be modified to reflect this .
How was this accomplished ?
The answer is quite simple : electors would in the future continue to cast two votes ( and one of them , as before , would have to be for a non-native of the elector ’ s home state ) , but , crucially , one of the two votes would explicitly be to fill the presidency , while the other designated who should become vice president .
Never again could presidential candidates and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of tie vote that forced the House to choose between Jefferson and Burr .
The Twelfth Amendment was proposed by the Eighth Congress on December 9 , 1803 and submitted to the states three days later .
There being seventeen states in the Union at that time , thirteen had to ratify it .
Secretary of State James Madison declared that the Amendment had been added to the Constitution on September 25 , 1804 , at which time fourteen of the seventeen states had ratified it .
Delaware , Connecticut , and Massachusetts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact ratified it in 1961 ! )
.
The election of 1804 and all subsequent elections were carried out under the terms of the Twelfth Amendment .
This splitting of the presidency and vice-presidency did not go uncontested .
At least two senators expressed their reservations about the quality of vice presidential candidates .
Rather than asking of a candidate “ Is he capable ?
Is he honest ?
” , Delaware ’ s Senator White suggested that the question instead would be “ Can he by his name , by his connections @ @ @ @ @ @ @ local situation , by his influence , or his intrigues , best promote the election of a President ?
” Senator Tracy of Connecticut agreed : “ Will the ambitious , aspiring candidate for the Presidency , will his friends and favorites promote the election of a man of talents , probity and popularity for Vice President , and who may prove his rival ?
No !
They will seek a man of moderate talents.
” One might well ask how often such fears have been realized in our history .
In addition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of political parties , the Amendment made another important change : The original Constitution provided that the failure of any candidate to achieve a majority would require the House to choose as president one of the five top-ranking candidates , with the person coming in second to serve as vice-president unless there was tie for second place , in which case the Senate would choose between them .
Now , however , the House would choose only the President from the top three choices of the electors ; the Senate would now choose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ choices of the electors for that specific office .
Among other things , this guaranteed , in effect , that there would always be a vice president , who could presumably take the reins of the presidency should the House be hopelessly divided among the top three candidates for the presidency .
This aspect of the Twelfth Amendment became crucial in 1824 , the only time since 1800 that the House in fact selected the president as the result of the inability of any of the presidential candidates to achieve a majority of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 99 , John Quincy Adams 84 , William Crawford 41 , and Henry Clay 37 .
Under the original Constitution , the House would have been able to choose among all four , and one might plausibly believe that Clay might have prevailed .
Under the Twelfth Amendment , however , Clay was out of the running , and the choice was reduced to Jackson , Adams , and Crawford .
Although no election since 1824 has been decided in the House of Representatives , a shift of relatively few votes in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have led to that result in 1948 , 1968 , and 2000 .
What this means , practically speaking , is that in contemporary America , Wyoming , the smallest state with under 600,000 people , would have the same say in choosing a new president as California , with a population nearly 70 times that of Wyoming .
As much to the point , perhaps , it is quite easy to imagine the popular vote winner losing to the runner-up in part because gerrymandered delegations in the House of Representatives voted for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the person who actually received a majority of their state ’ s popular vote .
Because of the potential disconnect between the popular vote and the result of the electoral vote ( or potential vote in the House ) , there have been recurrent proposals simply to elect the president by popular vote .
If , though , one shares any of White ’ s or Tracy ’ s concerns about the vice presidency , popular election would not necessarily assuage them if one were forced to vote for the president and vice-president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientists have determined that voters rarely cast their vote on the basis of the vice presidential candidate . )
One possible reform is to adopt the practice in many states and “ unbundle ” the election of our two top executive branch officials .
That is , just as in many states candidates for governor and lieutenant governor run entirely separate campaigns , meaning that sometimes the governor is from one party and the lieutenant governor from another , one could imagine separate elections for the president and vice president .
Even within @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voting for two slates of electors , one charged with choosing the president , the other picking the vice president .
Most of the time , of course , voters would pick the slates of the same political party .
But one can imagine that at least on occasion voters might be so put off by the vice presidential candidate that they would “ split ” their ticket .
That very possibility might serve to discipline presidential candidates more than is now the case , especially because candidates who win the presidential nomination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their running mates .
This was not the case before the 20th century , when political conventions often exercised real choice in picking both candidates .

97,467 views
A few weeks ago I brought you the story titled:
Here’s What Happens Next If Trump REFUSES To Concede….(it’s happened twice before in history)
That article (copied below) explains exactly what happens if there is a dispute among the electors in the Electoral College.
And guess what?
Today it got WILD!
GOP electors in 7 swing states just gave President Trump a wide open door to a win via the 12th Amendment.
Check this out:
HISTORIC AND UNPARALLELED – PA, GA, MI, WI, AZ, NV, and NM all had GOP electors cast votes for @realDonaldTrump. That preserves @POTUS’ right to remedy fraud with his own electors. — Bernard B. Kerik (@BernardKerik) December 14, 2020
https://twitter.com/AntonioSabatoJr/status/1338567498208337922
PA, GA, MI, WI, AZ, NV, and NM all had GOP electors cast votes for @realDonaldTrump. Both sets of electors cast votes in these states. That preserves @POTUS’ right to remedy fraud with his own electors. — Christina Bobb (@christina_bobb) December 14, 2020
As of right now, to my knowledge, GOP Electors have submitted ballots for President Trump in the following States:
• Nevada (6)
• Pennsylvania (20)
• Georgia (16)
42 Electoral Votes total.
Contested.
Congress decides.
Could be 274–266 Trump victory.
Michigan?
Wisconsin? — Aaron J. Carpenter🇺🇸 (@aaronjcarpenter) December 14, 2020
https://twitter.com/TheRightMelissa/status/1338651454635175946
https://twitter.com/TheRightMelissa/status/1338572701787623427
https://twitter.com/PamelaGeller/status/1338618286007672832
And for those of you who say “this isn’t real”…..you’d be wrong.
Here is Rudy himself confirming the story:
My friends at The Gateway Pundit had even more details to confirm:
The Electoral Count Act (ECA) of 1887 says each chamber of Congress will separately decide which slate of ‘dueling electors’ to accept. The new congress that will be sworn in on January 3 will be the ones doing the count. Advertisement – story continues below The Senate would vote for the Vice President. Republicans currently hold the Senate. The House of Representatives would choose the President however it is not one vote per lawmaker like it is in the senate. The House in each state gets one vote and with the new Congress, Republicans will have the advantage with 27 of the state delegations – a candidate needs 26 votes to win the White House. If the two chambers disagree, we could end up in uncharted territory, though experts typically say that electors approved by each state’s “executive” should prevail.
Want more details on how the 12th Amendment will work?
Most people don’t have any idea that it even exists.
My original article is below….
Enjoy!
Ok folks, get ready to have your mind blown!
A friend of mine sent me this video and as I was watching I thought “wait….that can’t be true.”
But the guy who sent it to me is very smart and he does his homework.
So I did some more digging and it looks like it IS true.
Oh my.
I actually read the 12th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and it’s all in there!
Have you ever read it?
I bet 999 out of 1,000 people couldn’t even tell you what the 12th Amendment is about, but it’s in there and it’s real.
Watch this and prepare to have your mind blown:
And in case that gets taken down, I have a backup on Rumble.
Too important to miss.
Here you go:
Full Text of the 12th Amendment, from Law.Cornell.edu:
12th Amendment Amendment XII The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;–The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;–the person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
And from Wikipedia:
The Twelfth Amendment (Amendment XII) to the United States Constitution provides the procedure for electing the president and vice president. It replaced the procedure provided in Article II, Section 1, Clause 3, by which the Electoral College originally functioned. The amendment was proposed by the Congress on December 9, 1803, and was ratified by the requisite three-fourths of state legislatures on June 15, 1804. The new rules took effect for the 1804 presidential election and have governed all subsequent presidential elections. Under the original rules of the Constitution, each member of the Electoral College cast two electoral votes, with no distinction made between electoral votes for president and electoral votes for vice president. The presidential candidate receiving the greatest number of votes—provided that number equaled a majority of the electors—was elected president, while the presidential candidate receiving the second-most votes was elected vice president. In cases where no individual won a vote from a majority of the electors, as well as in cases where multiple individuals won votes from a majority of electors but tied each other for the most votes, the House of Representatives would hold a contingent election to select the president. In cases where multiple candidates tied for the second-most votes, the Senate would hold a contingent election to select the vice president. The first four presidential elections were conducted under these rules. The experiences of the 1796 and 1800 presidential elections – showing that the original system caused the election of a President and Vice-President who were political opponents of each other, constantly acting at cross-purposes – spurred legislators to amend the presidential election process, requiring each member of the Electoral College to cast one electoral vote for president and one electoral vote for vice president. Under the new rules, a contingent election is still held by the House of Representatives if no candidate wins a presidential electoral vote from a majority of the electors, but there is no longer any possibility of multiple candidates winning presidential electoral votes from a majority of electors. The Twelfth Amendment also lowered the number of candidates eligible to be selected by the House in a presidential contingent election from five to three, established that the Senate would hold a contingent election for vice president if no candidate won a majority of the vice presidential electoral vote, and provided that no individual constitutionally ineligible to the office of president would be eligible to serve as vice president.
Remember, President Trump has said he WON and he hasn’t backed down:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325099845045071873?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1325099845045071873%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcms.qz.com%2Fembed-sandbox%2F1928848%2Ftwitter.com%2FrealDonaldTrump%2Fstatus%2F1325099845045071873
Does this look like a many ready to concede?
Nope!
And from CNBC:
He then offered an answer to the question many have been asking: What if Trump refuses to ever concede? “He may never concede; he doesn’t have to concede,” Yoo said. “The thing about the American Constitution is that it doesn’t actually require the sitting president to do anything one way or the other. On January 20th, Donald Trump’s term ends and Joe Biden’s, I believe, will begin.”
QZ.com confirms how the 12th Amendment works:
States allow the popular vote to determine the appointment of electors, but Trump and his allies could use friendly state legislatures and governors to send alternate—or in the case of states with Republican legislatures and Democratic governors, additional—electors. When the electoral college convenes on Dec. 14, states with competing electors would cast double their allotted votes, forcing Senate president Mike Pence to figure out what to do with the doubled-up votes. If Pence threw out the extra votes and neither candidate hit 270, the decision goes to the House. There, each state delegation gets one vote; currently, in 27 states, a majority of delegates are Republican. (For a trip down memory lane: Back in 2000, Florida’s Republican legislature was on the cusp of appointing new electors to vote for Bush as the court-ordered recount dragged on. The SCOTUS decision rendered that preparation moot. Also, in 1876, states sent competing electoral college delegations and after Congress failed for months to agree on which was valid, a last-minute deal was struck that made Rutherford B. Hayes president as long as he agreed to end Reconstruction.)
And from TheConversation.com:
Congress will open and record the votes of the Electoral College in Washington, DC, on January 6, 2021. But this time when, as per the 12th amendment of the US Constitution, “the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates,” the procedure may not be a simple formality. Because each house is controlled by a different party, each may approve their own list, or both houses may reject the electors from some states. The legal framework is so vague that no one outcome can be certain. In case of a tie, the 12th Amendment states that “the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President” and that “the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote”. As things stand, this method of adding up state representations rather that the individual votes of the 435 representatives would give the Republicans a majority to reelect their candidate. But everything hinges on the elections in the House and Senate, also on November 3, since the final decision would be up to the members of the new Congress, to be installed on January 3, 2021. Incidentally, the current Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, is an unparalleled strategist who has already mapped the districts the Democrats must win on November 3 in order to have not only a seat majority but also a majority of blue states in the House of Representatives.
Here is even more on the history and working of the 12th Amendment, from the ConstitutionCenter.org:


welovetrump--2020-12-15--DNI John Radcliffe:  “We’ll See If There IS a Biden Administration…”

Bill Barr proved himself to be a Swamp Rat .
But Director of National Intelligence John Radcliffe has proven the exact opposite… .
And I love what he told Maria Bartiromo recently when asked about Biden and his alleged incoming administration : “ We ’ ll see if there IS one !
” he said .
Ask yourself , what does he know ?
The left is already melting down : The Trump administration ’ s director of national intelligence on Sunday refused to acknowledge a Biden administration , the latest denial as the president and his allies launch increasingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transfer of power .
“ Well , these election issues , we ’ ll see who ’ s in what seats and whether there is a Biden administration , ” said DNI director John Ratcliffe , after Fox News host Maria Bartiromo asked what the official thought of Mr Biden ’ s cabinet picks and their approach to China .
During the interview , Mr Ratcliffe also cast doubt on the use of mail-in voting , long considered safe and used by the president himself this election , and further echoed conspiracies from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have continued to spread false claims about the integrity of the election even though federal officials have declared it was secure and no evidence of meaningful voter fraud has been found .
Mr Ratcliffe called on federal authorities to reassure the public about the integrity of the election .
“ I would hope that the leadership at the FBI and the Department of Justice would speak to those things , directly to the American people , because there is a lack of confidence there , ” he said .
“ There are a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t think the votes were counted fairly.
” Earlier this month , Trump appointee attorney general William Barr told the Associated Press that federal authorities were following through on complaints about election issues , but hadn ’ t found anything meaningful .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
19,601 views
Bill Barr proved himself to be a Swamp Rat.
But Director of National Intelligence John Radcliffe has proven the exact opposite….
A friend of Trump, a patriot, and a fighter!
And I love what he told Maria Bartiromo recently when asked about Biden and his alleged incoming administration: “We’ll see if there IS one!” he said.
Ask yourself, what does he know?
The left is already melting down:
We'll see if Radcliffe has a job come Jan. 21, 2021! Highly doubtful!
@DNI_Ratcliffe Trump’s intelligence director says ‘we’ll see’ if there’s a Biden administration https://t.co/ThfdXf1C1A via @Yahoo — Firewire (@1Firewire) December 7, 2020
Trump’s intelligence director says ‘we’ll see’ if there’s a Biden administration. What is with this Radcliffe Clown? What does he have to gain. He knows he’s lying. Everyone knows he’s lying. BIDEN WON THE ELECTION. PERIOD! https://t.co/AJeD0vrgl6 — Billy Amonette (@AmonetteBilly) December 8, 2020
Watch the clip here:
And from Yahoo News:


welovetrump--2020-12-15--Bill Barr Is OUT and You’re Gonna Love His Replacements!

Can you see the puzzle pieces fitting into place ?
For two years we ’ ve all wondered if Bill Barr was a white hat or a Deep State shill .
The jury may still be out on that .
I tend to lean towards Deep State shill because I can ’ t point to one thing he actually did for the patriots while in office .
Yet President Trump gave him a very warm Tweet on the way out the door , which is more than others have received .
So who are these new guys ?
Well , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ !
How do you like that ?
Sometimes it helps me to see what the other side is saying .
And when the Black Lives Matter people have this to say about someone , I know they must actually be a great patriot : I do have some concerns about Rosen .
Rosen is from the same globalist law firm as Barr .
Here ’ s what CNN had to say ( and note that they are not celebrating Barr ’ s departure , which is interesting ) : For much of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regarded as Donald Trump ’ s most-valued wingman .
The attorney general enabled the President ’ s darkest instincts on the possibility of vote fraud in mail-in ballots .
He compared lockdown orders as a result of the coronavirus pandemic to slavery .
He tried to have the Justice Department take over the President ’ s defense in a defamation suit filed against Trump .
Given all of that , there might be a tendency to believe that Barr ’ s resignation as the nation ’ s top cop Monday night — a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the President was considering firing him — marks the end of a era in which the Department of Justice was used ( and misused ) to further the political whims of the President .
While there ’ s no doubt that Barr , on a number of occasions , made himself a willing participant in Trump ’ s efforts to turn the Justice Department into his own private score-settling agency , there ’ s been several examples of late in which Barr bucked the President ’ s wishes in critical moments .
* @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Barr went out of his way this past fall to ensure that the federal investigation into Hunter Biden ’ s financial dealings never went public in the course of a presidential campaign in which Trump sought to make the son of his Democratic opponent a major issue .
* Earlier this month , Barr directly contradicted Trump ’ s repeated claims that there was widespread voter fraud in the presidential election .
“ To date , we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Press in an interview .
Those twin moves suggest that , while he was willing to bend to Trump ’ s will , Barr ’ s ultimate loyalty — at least in these instances — was with the rule of law .
Which , of course , made Trump angry .
And made him want to get rid of Barr .
Which , effectively , he did on Monday night — as Barr ’ s resignation is rightly understood as one forced by the President ’ s repeated public attacks on him .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggested , in an interview with Fox ’ s Maria Bartiromo that both the FBI and Department of Justice might be involved in the attempt to keep him from winning .
He offered no proof of this massive claim . )
All of which begs this question : If Barr wasn ’ t loyal enough to Trump or willing to do everything the President asked of him , what will the post-Barr DOJ look like for the final weeks of the Trump presidency ?
In announcing Barr ’ s resignation , the President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rosen would serve as the acting attorney general — although he did not specify whether Rosen would hold that job for the remainder of Trump ’ s term .
Trump has previously expressed his preference for “ acting ” officials in key roles .
“ I like acting because I can move so quickly , ” he said in 2019 .
“ it gives me more flexibility.
” It also gives him more control over the broader government apparatus as he can place unquestioning loyalists in posts without having to worry about those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ What that means for the DOJ is that Trump is very likely to enjoy something close to unfettered control over the department between now and January 20 .
That could mean the appointment of a special counsel to ensure the Hunter Biden investigation continues beyond the Trump presidency .
It could mean increased pressure on special counsel John Durham , who is investigating the origins of the Russia counter-intelligence probe in 2016 , to announce his findings and/or bring charges .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
34,186 views
Can you see the puzzle pieces fitting into place?
I can.
For two years we’ve all wondered if Bill Barr was a white hat or a Deep State shill.
The jury may still be out on that.
I tend to lean towards Deep State shill because I can’t point to one thing he actually did for the patriots while in office.
Yet President Trump gave him a very warm Tweet on the way out the door, which is more than others have received.
Take a look:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1338614499981602819?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1338614514493878273%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es2_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.khq.com%2Fnews%2Fattorney-general-bill-barr-to-resign-before-the-holidays%2Farticle_28f7c180-3e5e-11eb-9862-c773d4872ffd.html
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1338614514493878273
So who are these new guys?
Well, they have close ties to General Flynn!
How do you like that?
Take a look:
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1338623839719333890
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1338624644434292737
I like his replacement. Deputy AG to be Richard Donoghue, who served as a paratrooper in the 82nd Airborne Division – the same military unit General Michael Flynn was part of. — Tom Greeves (@GreevesTom) December 14, 2020
Sometimes it helps me to see what the other side is saying.
And when the Black Lives Matter people have this to say about someone, I know they must actually be a great patriot:
Corrupt Deputy Attorney General Jeff Rosen, an outlandish person, will become a worse Attorney General.
Lowly & disrespected Richard Donoghue will be taking over the duties of degrading the Deputy Attorney General’s office. DAMN you to all, especially #CrybabyTrump!
🖕🏽 pic.twitter.com/y2sRVX20ma — Donood J. Twump #BlackLivesMatter (@WealDonoodTwump) December 14, 2020
I do have some concerns about Rosen.
Rosen is from the same globalist law firm as Barr.
From the DOJ:
Jeffrey A. Rosen is the 38th Deputy Attorney General of the United States. In this role, he acts as the Department of Justice’s Chief Operating Officer and advises and assists the Attorney General in leading the Department’s more than 110,000 employees. President Trump announced his intent to nominate Mr. Rosen to this position on February 19, 2019, and the U.S. Senate confirmed the nomination on May 16, 2019. As the Justice Department’s second-ranking official, Mr. Rosen oversees all of the Department’s components, including its law enforcement agencies, litigating divisions, ninety-four U.S. Attorney offices, and its management, policy and other staff offices. Mr. Rosen maintains a strong focus on implementation of the Department’s key priorities, including protection of national security, protection of public safety by combatting violent crime and drugs, safeguarding civil rights and liberties, and maintaining the rule of law. Mr. Rosen has guided numerous initiatives, including an antitrust review of online technology platforms, criminal and civil opioids enforcement and legislation, investigations and prosecutions of IP theft and of cyberhacking, counter-UAS measures to facilitate safe use of drones, redress of pandemic-related fraud, and reform of regulatory and administrative law, among others. In February 2020 Mr. Rosen presented oral argument to the U.S. Supreme Court in a case involving prison inmate litigation (Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez). Though most of Mr. Rosen’s nearly four-decade career was in the private sector, he has almost a decade of public sector experience, including U.S. Senate confirmations on two previous occasions. Prior to arriving at the Department of Justice, Mr. Rosen served as the Deputy Secretary of Transportation (2017-2019), where he was the Chief Operating Officer of a Cabinet Department with more than 55,000 employees and a budget in excess of $80 billion. Other appointed public sector positions include General Counsel and Senior Policy Advisor for the White House Office of Management and Budget (2006-2009) and General Counsel at the U.S. Department of Transportation (2003-2006). He was also an appointed Public Member of the Administrative Conference of the United States (2013-2017). In the private sector, Mr. Rosen first joined the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis as an associate in 1982 and became a partner in 1988. He was elected to that firm’s global management committee in 1999. After his public-service appointments during 2003-2009, Mr. Rosen returned to Kirkland & Ellis LLP as a partner from 2009-2017. Throughout his years in private practice, Mr. Rosen handled complex litigation across the United States, including jury trials, bench evidentiary hearings, arbitrations, and appellate arguments. Among his wide-ranging litigation practice were cases involving antitrust, securities, RICO, business torts, trade secrets, contracts, government enforcement actions, and product liability, including class actions, as well as regulatory matters. Mr. Rosen served as the Chair of the American Bar Association’s Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice during 2015-2016. In addition, he previously served as an adjunct professor at Georgetown University Law Center, where he taught Professional Responsibility and Legal Ethics. Mr. Rosen received a B.A. (economics) with highest distinction from Northwestern University (1979) and a J.D., magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School (1982).
Here’s what CNN had to say (and note that they are not celebrating Barr’s departure, which is interesting):


welovetrump--2020-12-14--Just In: President Trump Announces Attorney General Bill Barr Has Resigned

President Trump has announced that Bill Barr has resigned from his role as the Attorney General and will be leaving just before Christmas .
His resignation comes at an interesting time considering the fact that multiple sources have recently stated that Barr had knowledge of the Hunter Biden laptop in the spring but failed to report any information on it .
Attorney General William Barr will leave his position later this month , President Donald Trump said in a tweet on Monday .
The news comes not long after Barr said there was no widespread fraud in the 2020 election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ baseless claims the basis of a failed legal bid to overturn the results and stay in power .
“ Just had a very nice meeting with Attorney General Bill Barr at the White House , ” Trump tweeted .
“ Our relationship has been a very good one , he has done an outstanding job !
As per letter , Bill will be leaving just before Christmas to spend the holidays with his family.
” Barr “ resigned on his own accord ” and “ wasn ’ t pushed out or forced to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House official .
His afternoon meeting with Trump was described as “ very amicable ” by this official .
Barr ’ s resignation comes days after the President sent out these tweets : Attorney General William Barr , is resigning amid lingering tension with the president over the president ’ s claims of election fraud and the investigation into President-elect Joe Biden ’ s son .
Barr went Monday to the White House , where Trump said the attorney general submitted his letter of resignation .
“ As per letter , Bill will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the holidays with his family , ” Trump tweeted .
Trump has publicly expressed his anger about Barr ’ s statement to The Associated Press earlier this month that the Justice Department had found no widespread election fraud that would change the outcome of the election .
Trump has also been angry that the Justice Department did not publicly announce it was investigating Hunter Biden ahead of the election , despite department policy against such a pronouncement .
NATIONAL POLL : Should Ilhan Omar Be IMPEACHED and Removed From Office ?
Maybe we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrats by the new Attorney General Jeff Rosen .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
438 views
Breaking News!
United States Attorney General William Barr has officially resigned.
President Trump has announced that Bill Barr has resigned from his role as the Attorney General and will be leaving just before Christmas.
His resignation comes at an interesting time considering the fact that multiple sources have recently stated that Barr had knowledge of the Hunter Biden laptop in the spring but failed to report any information on it.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1338614514493878273
“As per letter, Bill will be leaving just before Christmas to spend the holidays with his family.” President Trump announced #AGBarr will be leaving his position, and Deputy Attorney General #JeffRosen will take his spot. https://t.co/bOql1o900A — The Epoch Times (@EpochTimes) December 14, 2020
BREAKING: President Trump says AG Barr will step down before Christmas; Deputy AG Jeff Rosen to become Acting AG. pic.twitter.com/Ac296kGhYP — NBC News (@NBCNews) December 14, 2020
NBC News covered Barr’s resignation and added these details:
Attorney General William Barr will leave his position later this month, President Donald Trump said in a tweet on Monday. The news comes not long after Barr said there was no widespread fraud in the 2020 election, defying Trump, who has made baseless claims the basis of a failed legal bid to overturn the results and stay in power. “Just had a very nice meeting with Attorney General Bill Barr at the White House,” Trump tweeted. “Our relationship has been a very good one, he has done an outstanding job! As per letter, Bill will be leaving just before Christmas to spend the holidays with his family.” Barr “resigned on his own accord” and “wasn’t pushed out or forced to resign,” according to a White House official. His afternoon meeting with Trump was described as “very amicable” by this official.
Barr’s resignation comes days after the President sent out these tweets:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1337772511870799872
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1337755490563010560
The AP News dropped these details:
Attorney General William Barr, is resigning amid lingering tension with the president over the president’s claims of election fraud and the investigation into President-elect Joe Biden’s son. Barr went Monday to the White House, where Trump said the attorney general submitted his letter of resignation. “As per letter, Bill will be leaving just before Christmas to spend the holidays with his family,” Trump tweeted. Trump has publicly expressed his anger about Barr’s statement to The Associated Press earlier this month that the Justice Department had found no widespread election fraud that would change the outcome of the election. Trump has also been angry that the Justice Department did not publicly announce it was investigating Hunter Biden ahead of the election, despite department policy against such a pronouncement.
Maybe we will start seeing some prosecutions of corrupt Democrats by the new Attorney General Jeff Rosen.


welovetrump--2020-12-15--Left Wing Henchmen Shut Down Local Businessman’s Shop. His Response: “Are You Going To Pay My Rent?”

“ The more numerous the laws , the more corrupt the state ” -Tacitus Gavin Newsom is cannibalizing his own people .
While he wines and dines in upscale resturants while he keeps his own business open .
He is doing all of this on the dime of the good people of California who pay the highest income taxes in The United States .
And now , some of the highest fines levied for “ pandemic ” regulations .
There is a term for this kind of behavior : parasitic .
Gavin Newsom is a parasite , and the army @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these “ laws ” who also live on the dime of California taxpayers , are also parasites .
Cuomo and De Blasio of New York , are also no different .
Together these three form the Axis Of Evil , which is hellbent on turning this country into thier own personal checking gulag .
It ’ s a wonder why people are leaving these states in droves , in a mass exodus if you will .
Small business owners , and citizens in California are now rising up , whether it be the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some good old civil disobedience , people are rising up .

“The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state” -Tacitus
Gavin Newsom is cannibalizing his own people. While he wines and dines in upscale resturants while he keeps his own business open.
He is doing all of this on the dime of the good people of California who pay the highest income taxes in The United States. And now, some of the highest fines levied for “pandemic” regulations.
There is a term for this kind of behavior: parasitic.
Gavin Newsom is a parasite, and the army of government minders and useless beauracrats enforcing these “laws” who also live on the dime of California taxpayers, are also parasites.
Cuomo and De Blasio of New York, are also no different. Together these three form the Axis Of Evil, which is hellbent on turning this country into thier own personal checking gulag.
It’s a wonder why people are leaving these states in droves, in a mass exodus if you will.
Small business owners, and citizens in California are now rising up, whether it be the petition to recall Gavin Newsom, or some good old civil disobedience, people are rising up.
Take a look:


welovetrump--2020-12-15--Mass Exodus: The Democratic Party Is Hemorrhaging Supporters, As The Party Sinks Deeper Into Radical

Mass Exodus: The Democratic Party Is Hemorrhaging Supporters, As The Party Sinks Deeper Into Radical Marxism

A spiritual disease , a mental cancer , and in many cases an intellectual disability , as Michaeal Savage so @ @ @ @ @ people are beginning to wake up to this .
Whether it be the mass exodus @ @ @ @ @ York or California , the growing calls to recall Gavin Newsom , or the rejection @ @ @ @ @ Fragility , people are taking notice .
They are voting with thier feet , by @ @ @ @ @ of America , Texas .
They are voting by the ballot by voting for President @ @ @ @ @ , you can only use semantic word games to delude people for only so long @ @ @ @ @ said : “ You can fool some people all of the time , you can @ @ @ @ @ some of the time , but you can not fool all of the people all @ @ @ @ @ newest figure to publicly voice their divorce from The American Marxist Party is Sheriff James @ @ @ @ @ , is switching his party affliation to the GOP .

Marxism is a disease.
A spiritual disease, a mental cancer, and in many cases an intellectual disability, as Michaeal Savage so rightly pointed out.
And people are beginning to wake up to this.
Whether it be the mass exodus from blue states like New York or California , the growing calls to recall Gavin Newsom, or the rejection of left wing Tyranny By Fragility, people are taking notice.
They are voting with thier feet, by moving to the beating heart of America, Texas. They are voting by the ballot by voting for President Trump.
The thing is, you can only use semantic word games to delude people for only so long.
A wise man once said: “You can fool some people all of the time, you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.”
The newest figure to publicly voice their divorce from The American Marxist Party is Sheriff James Custer, formerly a democrat, is switching his party affliation to the GOP.
Check it out:


welovetrump--2020-12-15--Michigan Electoral College Opens Up Proceedings With The Black National Anthem

There ’ s one national anthem for all people of America but the Dems are once again trying to segregate Americans .
Before the start of the Michigan Electoral College proceedings , Electors were asked to stand for the National Anthem and the Black National Anthem .
The left continues to preach unity but in reality they are clearly dividing people .
A national anthem is supposed to bring everyone together , having two national anthems just creates division .
The National File covered the story and reported these details : Democrat officials in Michigan ordered the entire floor to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for a “ black national anthem ” during Monday ’ s ceremony to confirm the votes of sixteen Democrat electors for Democrat presidential and vice-presidential hopefuls Joe Biden and Kamala Harris .
Attendees were ordered to “ please remain standing for the National Anthem and the “ black national anthem ” by the Turner Sisters , Jeliah and Jemilah Turner.
” The official proceedings were then halted for a melancholy rendition of “ Lift Every Voice and Sing , ” which was declared to be the “ Negro National Anthem ” by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The United States government does officially recognize any “ black national anthem , ” as the only federally recognized national anthem is “ The Star-Spangled Banner.
” The Washington Post covered the story also : Michigan ’ s presidential electors cast their 16 votes for Biden on Monday afternoon .
The ceremonial event opened with the national anthem , followed by “ Lift Every Voice and Sing , ” often referred to as the “ Black national anthem.
” A diverse group of Michigan religious leaders then led the gathering in prayer @

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
730 views
There’s one national anthem for all people of America but the Dems are once again trying to segregate Americans.
Before the start of the Michigan Electoral College proceedings, Electors were asked to stand for the National Anthem and the Black National Anthem.
The left continues to preach unity but in reality they are clearly dividing people.
A national anthem is supposed to bring everyone together, having two national anthems just creates division.
https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1338589226661711874
What a mess!! There is one national anthem!! They claim white people are racist. BLACK NATIONAL ANTHEM IS RACIST https://t.co/jDUQDUVcAW — Brandon Tatum (@TheOfficerTatum) December 14, 2020
The democrats know there is going to be serious backlash from this election because many ppl believe there was voter fraud. So they are continuing to make Black ppl the face of this, by singing the "Black National Anthem" before the Electoral College proceedings in Michigan today pic.twitter.com/TFVY6KRTj3 — Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸 (@tariqnasheed) December 14, 2020
The National File covered the story and reported these details:
Democrat officials in Michigan ordered the entire floor to rise to their feet and remain standing for a “black national anthem” during Monday’s ceremony to confirm the votes of sixteen Democrat electors for Democrat presidential and vice-presidential hopefuls Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
Attendees were ordered to “please remain standing for the National Anthem and the “black national anthem” by the Turner Sisters, Jeliah and Jemilah Turner.” The official proceedings were then halted for a melancholy rendition of “Lift Every Voice and Sing,” which was declared to be the “Negro National Anthem” by the National Association of Colored People in 1919. The United States government does officially recognize any “black national anthem,” as the only federally recognized national anthem is “The Star-Spangled Banner.”
“Black” National Anthem? Really? Next up … Gay National Anthem. Then Lesbian National Anthem. Then Trans Anthem. Let’s work on some suggestions. — Neal Boortz. Puddin’ Stick (@Talkmaster) December 14, 2020
https://twitter.com/toddstarnes/status/1338601529008394241
https://twitter.com/PamelaGeller/status/1338606330861420547
The Washington Post covered the story also:
Michigan’s presidential electors cast their 16 votes for Biden on Monday afternoon. The ceremonial event opened with the national anthem, followed by “Lift Every Voice and Sing,” often referred to as the “Black national anthem.” A diverse group of Michigan religious leaders then led the gathering in prayer.


welovetrump--2020-12-16--The Results Are In…..How Long Will YOU Continue To Wear a Mask Before You Refuse?

3 days
A couple months for those that vaccines get them but not me.
A few months
After I receive vaccine.
After the state has started the vaccine program
Age and conditions put me and wife in high risk category and we will be wearing masks and following status of infections as vaccination takes effect avoiding flu also part of reason to wear for us
ALL would have to agree to quit as of a certain day in order for the Police to not cope.
Already had Covid. Don’t wear one.
As a care giver I have to ,because they would not have the help that’s needed
As Christians, we are called to obey the “law”!UNLESS it goes against God’s law. So I guess if it becomes law….I might not have a choice.
As I choose daily and soon will be sans the fabric
As long as I’m under threat of arrest.
as long as mandated
As long as needed but not forever.
At work, they make us
BIDEN SAYS HE’LL ASK THE PUBLIC TO USE THE MASK FOR HIS FIRST 100 DAYS, AFTER THAT IT’S HISTORY.
Can’t go in a store without one. No choice. Bah Humbug. HATE IT
Can’t go to Mass or grocery store without one, so I will till I don’t have to in those 2 places. It’s okay to be a rebel, but we need Jesus and I will not give up Mass!
Case by case. Less and less.
Common Sense strikes!
depends on the circumstance
Don’t wear one very much
Don’t wear unless told to
done come summer 2021
E
Forced to wear for work
Gov Ivey wants us wear masks through Jan 22. I’d say that’s it.
Grocery store will not permit admittance unless wearing a mask.
Hardly ever
Have COPD. As long as I can breath while wearing it.
Haven’t ever worn one and won’t ever start.
Hopefully not long!
I wear the mask part-time now, when I’m around strangers. I would wear it as needed until the vaccine is administered.
I am 71 with very high risk conditions – I wear for “my” safety only
I am a kidney dialysis patient so my doctor feels I should wear one when I am out in public
I am over this and only wear when required (i.e. grocery, doctor appt’s)
I deliver pharmacy meds to assisted living and rehabs and have to be protected and cautious. some of the places I go to are infected with covid.
I do not wear unless I’m refused service
I don’t wear or bring one with me when going into places now. However, if they give me one in order to enter, I still take it. I haven’t refused and made a scene yet but it’s coming.
I don’t now unless it’s required for entry
I don’t wear one outside but all the stores require them so hopefully they stop requiring them soon
I have NEVER wore one!!!
I have never worn a mask and never will. Muzzles are for dogs not humans
I have to wear one for my job. Otherwise, I refuse to wear one
I have to wear one to shop for food. If they didn’t force that on me I would never wear it.
I have to wear to get food and necessities at least until the spring but after that I’m done.
I have trouble breathing now, I only wear one for a long as I am able to stand it!
I haven’t worn a mask with the exception of a handful of times
I heard the mandate to wear the mask goes HIGHER than Trump No l dont like wearing it either..
I honestly don’t know how long at this point.
I just don’t know. Living in CA, it’s hard to make a stand.
I live in NY and will wear one in stores because it is required but I will not waer it otherwise.
I need groceries and to buy Christmas presents for the family.
I only do at work cause I need to work
I only have to go into the store for shopping. They won’t let me in if I don’t have one on. Other than that the GOVERNMENT/GOVERNOR can kiss my ass.
I only put it on when entering a business in areas where it’s been mandated and businesses must require them out of respect for the business owners. They have enough to contend with as it is. I’ll help them get through the Christmas shopping season and then it’s over.
I only put it on when I go in a store,
I only put one on when entering a business. Off as soon as Im at the door going out.
I only ware one when I have to.
I only wear a mask right before I enter the door of the establishment that requires one to enter. I absolutely HATE wearing one (I have trouble breathing with one) and if it’s not required for entry, I will stop wearing one immediately!
I only wear a mask when I go to the grocery store other than that I do not wear on. It is stupid and political and just another way to try to dominate the people of the USA to become a communist nation. Do not believe the mask helps anything.
I only wear a mask when I need to go into a business requiring one.
I only wear a mask when it is required. In grocery store, other stores, going into the restaurants required before I sit down to take it off.
I only wear in stores or at Dr office
I only wear it if the owners required it.
I only wear it To access a store that I must access.. And I have been kicked out of many
I only wear it when a place of business requires it.
I only wear it when I absolutely have too
I only wear it when I go in a store where you have to wear it I am over this pandemic open up the country
I only wear it when the store requires it
I only wear my mask to go shopping. Can’t get buy groceries otherwise.
I only wear now when mandated and forced upon me! Example when told I can’t enter an establishment without one! Otherwise I enter without a mask!
I ONLY wear one in medical facilities.
I only wear one in small businesses that have signs posted. Out of respect for the owner, so that they stay open. My medical professional has already told me that they don’t block the virus.
i only wear one in stores
I only wear one in stores I need to go into and have to. I basically dont wear one unless that happens.
I only wear one inside a store that refuses service without one. I grudgibgly put one on in that case. No other time.
I only wear one to enter a business that makes it mandatory. I don’t want them to get in trouble.
I only wear one when entering a store that requires one. It’s just a form form of control by the CCP.
I only wear one when I go into an establishment that requires one.
I only wear one when I grocery shop because it’s required–they won’t let me shop. Otherwise I don’t wear one.
I only wear one when it is required to enter an establishment I want to go into…
I only wear one when ordered to do so at my job
I only wear one when required.
I ONLY WEAR ONE WHERE IT’S “REQUIRED”.
I only wear one where it’s required to get in.
I only wear the mask if it is required at an office/establishment I have to enter.
I only wear the mask to my doctor appointments.
I only wear them going into grocery stores so mein fhurer doesn’t close the store down. I live in NM
I only wear them when it’s 100% required, but thankfully I live in FL so they don’t make too big of a stink about it
i rarely have worn it
I think enough is enough and when you can’t depend on what the experts say then it’s up to the individual. I personally am not in favor of continuing to force people to do something that they wouldn’t do any other tiem.
I think it’s a scam for control! I will not wear it unless I’m in a large crowd…and only because we have to.
I was thinking until I got the shot but now I am not sure if I will get the shot, because I have had the COVID-19
I wear it because of my age
I wear it only at work as I’m mandated to do. I’m ready for the damn things to be gone
I wear one if stores have a sign saying to wear face mask
I wear one only when I enter a store, that is only, I do not wear one when driving or outside in my yard. I really think it is a BOGUS demo-commie BULL-S**T ploy, a sick social experiment, all of their ploys to take out THE REAL POTUS D.J.THUMP has failed, to stop this, The shot callers need to be arrested and tried and convicted and sentenced, obama,clinton,soro,biden,harris,pelosi,schiff,nadler,swalwell,
I wear one when I know I will be around other people I don’t know.
i will comply until i have had the vaccine. although i don’t see that they help any at all there is the chance i could be wrong. i am an elder with a compromised immunity so i basically stay home anyway so i hardly ever wear one.
I will continue to wear one around people I know are susceptible to have other health issues if they contract Covid.
I will not wear one now!!
I will only wear a mask when around a crowd of people. Until I’ve gotten my vaccine
I will only wear one to stop Governor from blackmailing a small business into closure if I don’t wear it in the store.
I will wear a mask in order to attend church, shop and share my love for God in Religious education at church. BTW, why aren’t they talking about washing hands anymore?
I will wear a mask until it is mandated, then I will use civil disobedience and no longer wear one if I am forced to wear it.
I will wear them if required in a store but not anywhere else and if Biden gets in I refuse to wear one at all!
I will wear them ONLY if I have to…getting groceries or a store I need to enter.
I wore one for a little wie at the very beginning in March/April but have refused to wear one since. I use exemption badges. This Convid is BS!!
I’m 100% mask but with that being said, my wife has 2 or 3 underlining health conditions that make her susceptible to Covid. I wear one only because my wife asked me to and because I love her I do it. If it wasn’t for that I’d tell them where they could shove it
I’m 74 and I’m going to do what I feel best doing
i’m hit and miss….mainly wear one at costco
I’m sick of it now, but am required to wear one at work. So, I guess I have to if want to keep my job
I’ve one a mask once, to vote.
I’ve never worn a mask from the start.
IF REQUIRED TO ENTER A STORE OR BUSINESS
If the store requires it ok. I take it off when the store doesn’t. I have to shop for groceries.
If you can smell food, the mask is useless, inhaling or exhaling!
In order to go shopping when thats the only way! not!
In stores, if required, until vaccine has been dispensed.
in the Spring of 2021 if not sooner
It depends. The only reason I wear it now is because the stores I work for my job require it. I feel that the masks are training grounds for other more invasive government controls.
It’s all in GOD Hands
It’s an irritant! I’m 86, and rarely go out, but it’s hard for me to get my breath!
January 20
Just when I am out in stores. Never outside
just where i have too to get things I need
Masking is the least of our problems!
Masks Proteckts against Backteria and Germs, Not against a Virus.!!
Maybe today
My hubby and son are immune-compromised so I must
My husband had a massive stroke I wear one too protect him
my job is important working with teens…its does me no harm to wear a mask at work…as long a the presidet wears one sometimes, I can do the same
My wife is very high risk! So I’ll keep wearing it!
NEVER
Never have worn one.
No mask except to get groceries.
No more
Not long after the Democraps take over if they do.
Not much longer.
Not sure
Not sure
Not sure, but NOT FOREVER!!!!
Not sure, cancer surviver, parkinson’s and diabetic
Not sure.
NOW!!!!!
Occasionally
Once the vaccine has been given to all who want it.
Online wear if I can’t enter a store or need to fly. Off as soon as possible!
ONLY 3-6 months max for me, more than that is crazy
Only around vulnerable people
Only as long as I go into a business that requires one
Only at medical places
Only establishments that require them
Only if a business requires one
Only if I go for Doctor visit & have no choice.
Only if I go into a store that requires me to have one otherwise never
Only in a crowed public place, I have Heart problems.
Only in crowded stores, because you have to
Only in public areas until I get the vaccine
Only in stores.
Only in the store
Only to board a commercial aircraft
Only to buy stuff cannot buy with out mask on to enter stores
Only to go in businesses.
Only wear a mask now where I have to, to get in
only wear it at Doctors or hospitals now
Only wear mask to appointments
Only wear now when it’s Required.
Only wear one work – work is mandatory but I refuse to wear one outside of my job
Only wear when forced.
ONLY WHEN ASKED
Only when asked to
Only when going to store or they
Only when I am where Democrats are around , they are the mass spreaders of misinformation!
Only when I go to crowed places
Only when I have to wear one to go into a store
Only when I have to.
Only when in a public setting that it is required . Other than that it’s not used.
Only when in public and it’s requested.
Only when necessary to get in a store I need to shop at.
Only when required
Only when required by the store or restaurant.
Only when someone is near me.
Only when the haircutters or store refuse to let me in! Otherwise I won’t!
Only where one if asked to
Only where required in order to receive products needed to live, such as food. I have no interest in pneumonia from wearing it all the time!
Only where required. Never voluntarily!!!
Out if courtesy to others I wear one in a store! Otherwise off it goes!
Panic attack, no mask
Permanent
Rarely wear one now. Still surprised when I go out that some people expects you to wear a mask. Masks DO NOT stop the virus. If it did,there would be no virus now!
Sick of it! Ready to stop now!
SINCE THEY HAVE THE VACCINE MAYBE THE SICK ONES WANT SPEAD IT SO MUCH
That’s a good question… They are absolutely useless! Guess I’ve just been a “good little drone”
Through this winter -thru March 2021
Til Cornovirus disappeared
Til my job says I don’t have to.
Til the end of February.
Till my birthday(may)
Till spring
To keep my job, I wear one 8 hrs
To protect my wife
Tough question! Fed up now! Mabey till Trump is ReElected!
Trump elected, it will all go away.
Unfortunately grocery and other stores won’t let you in without one. Otherwise, I abstain.
Unfortunately, I work for Wal-Mart so I’ll wear one for as long as they make me
Unsure
Unsure
Unsure, I can’t imagine more than a couple more months.
Until a vaccine is taken by the people living in the US.and anyone entering the U.S. has taken the vaccine
Until after the Flu season only! Maybe by Spring time. Or earlier.
Until at least April. I find it helps my breathing/lungs in cold temps.
Until case numbers are clearly much lower
Until Covid is under control
until end of 2020 had enough now
Until everyone that wants a vaccine gets one
until family members lose fear
Until Governor takes them out. I have to otherwise you are kick out
Until I am convinced it has just become a demand.
Until I don’t get fined for not wearing one
Until I feel it is safe to go without!
Until I feel like I don’t need one…I wear it for myself, not others.
Until I feel safe, I’ve a compromised immune system!
Until I get the vaccine.
Until I get vaccinated
Until I move out of communist Canada?
until I think its safe
Until it’s confirmed President Trump won the election.
until most of the populatioin is vaccinated
Until President Trump and his medical say its necessary
until President Trump and his medical staff tell me
Until President Trump is reinstated as President for 2021-2025 and Covid is debunked!
Until Saturday december 20th, big march on Sherbrooke Street in Montreal.
Until Spring 2021
Until Spring 2021
Until summer when vaccine is sufficiently distributed
Until Summer, then I am done.
Until the death rate in our area drops to a minimal level. I believe the labs are reporting many, many false positives.
Until the end of winter
Until the governor says it’s no longer mandatory.
Until the stores allow us to enter without a mask
Until the vaccine starts to become readily available
Until Trump is inaugurated again in January.
Until Trump is inaugurated.
Until Trump says don’t worry about wearing a mask. If you choose to that is your choice but not demanded.
Until vaccinated
Until vaccinated
Until vaccine
Until vaccine is available no reason to wear one after I have vaccine.
Until, the Emporer calls it off..
Until.I get the vaccine
Using a plastic face mask only when needed, or required.
Waer one now as little as possible. Only when needed to enter a business that requires it
We all need to raise up and say hell no I am taking the demons lies no longer that lying news media and those demoncrats
WEAR A MASK IS A TOTAL SOUMISSION TO THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, THE RIGHT TO THE DIGNITY OF THE BODY
wear one occasionally but not always
Wear them when needed in shops otherwise nope!
Wear to doctor’s appointments only
When 80% of Americans have received the vaccine
When forced
When I am ready!
When I feel it is safe! After vaccine? Been very sick, week lungs, so more risk!
when i get the shot,its gone
When I get vaccine
When it is okay to go to a store or business without one.
When my president stops.
When neccesary
When necessary., Hospitals, Dr. Offices.
When President Trump is shown the winner
When president Trump says no more!!! God Bless our Great President
When the cases of covid start going down.
when there are enough of us that we cant be denied
When we do’t have to…..mandated where I live
When will store and retail businesses stop making me wear mask to enter
Whenever I can get into places without one.
Where I live, there is a mandatory mask order in all the businesses. You cannot go grocery shopping without one. I put a mask on at the door and take it off when I walk out the door.
Whether it helps or nit I’m subject to my daughter as I don’t want her angry with me. I obey the mandate but I forget to wear it at times. 😀😀


welovetrump--2020-12-16--White House Press Secretary McEnany Indicates That President Trump Is Far From Conceding The Fight!

Those of our readers who watched the press briefing heard the tone of those reporters .
Sad to say , @ @ @ @ @ .
The fact of the matter is the electoral college is just one step in @ @ @ @ @ is neither 100 % binding nor the be all end all as these reporters suggest @ @ @ @ @ Hillary Clinton have recently called for the abolition of the electoral college altogether , so @ @ @ @ @ in the minds of career politicians as a sturdy institution .
The fact is President @ @ @ @ @ , this fight is FAR from over .

Those of our readers who watched the press briefing heard the tone of those reporters.
Many are uneducated.
Sad to say, but it’s true. The fact of the matter is the electoral college is just one step in a constitutional process, it is neither 100% binding nor the be all end all as these reporters suggest.
In fact Democrats like Hillary Clinton have recently called for the abolition of the electoral college altogether, so it is not exactly enshrined in the minds of career politicians as a sturdy institution.
The fact is President Trump is FAR from done, this fight is FAR from over.
Check it out:


welovetrump--2020-12-15--Rep. Mo Brooks: “Trump Won the Electoral College” — I Won’t Join the “Surrender Caucus,” I Will Figh

Rep. Mo Brooks: “Trump Won the Electoral College” — I Won’t Join the “Surrender Caucus,” I Will Fight!

Yes , the Electoral College has officially voted for Joe Biden .
However , the Congress has to certify the votes .
When does that happen .
Now , Representative Mo Brooks is saying that he will not go down without a fight .
Does this mean that he will attempt to initiate the Electoral Count Act on January 6 and attempt to stop the certification ?
But his words about the electoral college have definitely raised a few eyebrows .
It takes just 1 House Representative and 1 Senator to be able to initiate the Electoral Count Act .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mo Brooks ?
Monday during an appearance on FBN ’ s “ Lou Dobbs Tonight , ” Rep. Mo Brooks ( R-AL ) vowed not to go down without a fight despite states having certified Electoral College results earlier in the day , which paved the way for Joe Biden to become the President-elect .
Brooks told host Lou Dobbs about his effort to challenge the Electoral College , which has happened as recently as 2017 after Donald Trump won the presidential election .
“ Well , it ’ s happened many times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Apparently , some folks have not done their history .
By way of example , the Democrats in the House tried it in 2017 when they tried to strike Alabama ’ s votes for Donald Trump .
Georgia , the same way , the House Democrats tried to strike it .
Barbara Boxer tried to strike Ohio for George Bush back in 2005 , so this is not unusual .
The law is very clear , the House of Representatives in combination with the United States Senate has the lawful authority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ submissions from states that have such flawed election systems that they ’ re not worthy of our trust.
” The Alabama Republican congressman also pledged not to be a part of what he deemed the “ surrender caucus ” with the GOP , adding that he needs a U.S .
Senator to join his challenge to the Electoral College for it to be successful .
Well , where we ’ re headed as a country is this , quite simply , we ’ re a Republic , and the bedrock of a Republic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And if you don ’ t have an honest and accurate voting system , then you may as well throw out the claim that you ’ re a Republic .
You ’ ve lost that right .
You ’ ve lost the control of your government , and under those circumstances , those who can steal the most votes , who can engage in the most voter fraud and get away with it are going to be the ones that rule the roost in Washington , D.C. That ’ s not what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s not what a million or so Americans who have lost their lives in wars wanted , giving us this Republic , this democracy where we could control our own fate and our own destiny .
So I have a choice , I can either sit back and surrender and be a part of the surrender caucus , or I can fight for our country .
And that ’ s what I ’ m going to do .
So on January 6 , I ’ m going to object to the submissions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in my judgment , have such flawed election systems that their vote counts are unworthy of our ratification in the United States Congress .
What I need is a United States Senator who will join me .
If we have a House member and a senator , then by golly , that forces a House vote and a floor vote on whether to accept this systematically flawed election system or to reject it .
I want to reject it so that we can have an honest and fair and accurate election.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ include Rand Paul and Ted Cruz .
Are there others who would be willing to STAND UP ?
!
So far , no Senator has publicly confirmed whether or not they will join Mo Brooks .
We expect that there will be several examples of courage on January 6 .
The Hill confirms that Brooks is calling on other Republicans to join him : Rep. Mo Brooks ( R-Ala. ) on Monday called on fellow House Republicans to sign on to his effort to challenge the certification of the Electoral College ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President-elect Joe Biden ’ s election victory as “ illegitimate.
” During an interview with Fox Business Network ’ s Lou Dobbs , Brooks dismissed the idea that rejecting Electoral College submissions from states , a move that has not been made by Congress since the 1800s , was “ unusual ” and urged his fellow members to support the effort .
Brooks made the remarks shortly after Biden secured the number of electoral votes needed to secure his election , something expected but that received prominent media attention given President Trump ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ This is not unusual , the law is very clear , the House of Representatives in combination with the United States Senate has the lawful authority to accept or reject Electoral College submissions from states with such flawed election systems that they are not worthy of our trust , ” Brooks said .
If a single U.S. senator joins Brooks in challenging the certification , it would force a debate and vote in the House and Senate .
No senator has done so , and a number of Republicans the morning after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want the party to move in that direction .
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell ( R-Ky. ) on Tuesday congratulated Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris on their victories .
We must pray for COURAGE and CONVICTION among our representatives !
Who is willing to FIGHT with Mo Brooks ?
SIGN THE PETITION : We Need National Voter ID !
Fight FOR the Constitution AND the American people !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
12,068 views
Yes, the Electoral College has officially voted for Joe Biden.
However, the Congress has to certify the votes.
When does that happen.
On January 6, 2021.
Now, Representative Mo Brooks is saying that he will not go down without a fight.
He won’t join the “surrender caucus.”
Does this mean that he will attempt to initiate the Electoral Count Act on January 6 and attempt to stop the certification?
We don’t know…
But his words about the electoral college have definitely raised a few eyebrows.
More details below:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1338876692073426944
Representative Mo Brooks lays it out here. January 6th 2021. 3 USC section 15. 12th amendment of the Constitution. VP presides as chair of the count of the electoral college votes. Republicans can stop Biden’s electors if GOP keeps US Senate majority.pic.twitter.com/M9i3xNtCmn — Christian Lamar (@christianllamar) December 12, 2020
It takes just 1 House Representative and 1 Senator to be able to initiate the Electoral Count Act.
Will someone have the courage to join Mo Brooks?
We hope so!
Breitbart has more details:
Monday during an appearance on FBN’s “Lou Dobbs Tonight,” Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) vowed not to go down without a fight despite states having certified Electoral College results earlier in the day, which paved the way for Joe Biden to become the President-elect. Brooks told host Lou Dobbs about his effort to challenge the Electoral College, which has happened as recently as 2017 after Donald Trump won the presidential election. “Well, it’s happened many times in the past,” Brooks said. “Apparently, some folks have not done their history. By way of example, the Democrats in the House tried it in 2017 when they tried to strike Alabama’s votes for Donald Trump. Georgia, the same way, the House Democrats tried to strike it. Barbara Boxer tried to strike Ohio for George Bush back in 2005, so this is not unusual. The law is very clear, the House of Representatives in combination with the United States Senate has the lawful authority to accept or reject Electoral College vote submissions from states that have such flawed election systems that they’re not worthy of our trust.” […] The Alabama Republican congressman also pledged not to be a part of what he deemed the “surrender caucus” with the GOP, adding that he needs a U.S. Senator to join his challenge to the Electoral College for it to be successful. Well, where we’re headed as a country is this, quite simply, we’re a Republic, and the bedrock of a Republic is an honest and accurate voting system. And if you don’t have an honest and accurate voting system, then you may as well throw out the claim that you’re a Republic. You’ve lost that right. You’ve lost the control of your government, and under those circumstances, those who can steal the most votes, who can engage in the most voter fraud and get away with it are going to be the ones that rule the roost in Washington, D.C. That’s not what our founding fathers wanted. That’s not what a million or so Americans who have lost their lives in wars wanted, giving us this Republic, this democracy where we could control our own fate and our own destiny. So I have a choice, I can either sit back and surrender and be a part of the surrender caucus, or I can fight for our country. And that’s what I’m going to do. So on January 6, I’m going to object to the submissions of Electoral College votes from various states that, in my judgment, have such flawed election systems that their vote counts are unworthy of our ratification in the United States Congress. What I need is a United States Senator who will join me. If we have a House member and a senator, then by golly, that forces a House vote and a floor vote on whether to accept this systematically flawed election system or to reject it. I want to reject it so that we can have an honest and fair and accurate election.”
This makes us EXCITED!
Potential Senators we could see joining Brooks include Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.
Are there others who would be willing to STAND UP?!
https://twitter.com/natetendo83/status/1338585755246059524
https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1337591014228279296
In 1887, Congress passed the Electoral Count Act that said that the slate from states “made at least six days prior to said time of meeting of the electors, shall be conclusive, and shall govern in the counting of the electoral votes as provided in the Constitution.” — Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons) December 7, 2020
If you're celebrating the SCOTUS ruling. Don't. Think 1876. Dueling electors. The Electoral Count Act has never been tested and is marred with problems. GOP controlled congress, SCOTUS will be the dems best hope. SCOTUS just said – "we don't get involved in election issues". — Mario Hewardt (@MarioHewardt) December 11, 2020
So far, no Senator has publicly confirmed whether or not they will join Mo Brooks.
But…
We expect that there will be several examples of courage on January 6.
The Hill confirms that Brooks is calling on other Republicans to join him:
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) on Monday called on fellow House Republicans to sign on to his effort to challenge the certification of the Electoral College’s votes on Jan. 6, while blasting President-elect Joe Biden’s election victory as “illegitimate.” During an interview with Fox Business Network’s Lou Dobbs, Brooks dismissed the idea that rejecting Electoral College submissions from states, a move that has not been made by Congress since the 1800s, was “unusual” and urged his fellow members to support the effort. Brooks made the remarks shortly after Biden secured the number of electoral votes needed to secure his election, something expected but that received prominent media attention given President Trump’s refusal to concede his loss. “This is not unusual, the law is very clear, the House of Representatives in combination with the United States Senate has the lawful authority to accept or reject Electoral College submissions from states with such flawed election systems that they are not worthy of our trust,” Brooks said. If a single U.S. senator joins Brooks in challenging the certification, it would force a debate and vote in the House and Senate. No senator has done so, and a number of Republicans the morning after Brooks spoke were signaling they did not want the party to move in that direction. NATIONAL POLL: Should Fauci Be Prosecuted For LYING To Congress? Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday congratulated Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris on their victories.
We must pray for COURAGE and CONVICTION among our representatives!
Who is willing to FIGHT with Mo Brooks?
And by extension…
Fight FOR the Constitution AND the American people!