welovetrump--2020-01-20--Joe Biden:  Republicans Have Savaged My Only Surviving Son

Former Vice President Joe Biden said on Tuesday during the CNN Democratic presidential debate that President Donald Trump and the Republican Party have “ savaged his surviving son ” Hunter Biden with “ lies ” about his business dealings in Ukraine .
Wolf Blitzer asked , “ Vice President Biden if you ’ re the nominee , is it going to be harder to run against President Trump if he ’ s been acquitted and able to claim vindication especially after what he said about your family ?
” Biden said , “ It ’ s irrelevant .
There ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nancy Pelosi and the House to move .
He has , in fact , committed impeachable offenses .
Whether the Senate is for them to decide , by the way , I ’ m told that I say we have to unite the country , and it will be harder after this trial .
It may be.
” He added , “ But look , I understand how these guys are —this Republican Party —they have gone after , savaged my surviving son , gone after me , told lies your networks won @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are flat out lies and I did my job .
The question is whether or not he did his job ?
And he hasn ’ t done his job .
So it doesn ’ t really matter whether or not he is gone after me .
I have to be in a position I think of the American people .
I can ’ t hold a grudge .
I have to be able to not only fight but heal .
And as president of the United States , that is what I will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is going to be a more division after he ’ s defeated by me this next time .
”

Say what now, Joe?
Republicans have done what to you and your son?
You say Republicans have “savaged” your only surviving son?
How is that again?
Did they hold a gun to his head and force him to accept a job in the Ukraine that he was not remotely qualified for and then accept huge paychecks from the company?
Which Republican forced him to do that?
I want names!
Of course you can probably tell I am firmly mocking that claim.
How ridiculous!


welovetrump--2020-01-20--Crowd Erupts As Sheriff Deputy Tripp Kester Says “I’m Not Gonna Enforce an Unconstitutional Law”

A sheriff 's deputy in Davidson County , North Carolina , delivered a powerful speech in defense of the Second Amendment Tuesday , before the county 's Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to declare the county a Second Amendment sanctuary as the country watches Virginia 's Democrat-controlled legislature 's plans to impose a series of gun control measures .
The Winston-Salem Journal reported that 20 people spoke before commissioners and a `` standing-room-only crowd of more than 150 . ''
Each person who made a statement was in favor of the proposed resolution to make Davidson County a Second Amendment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` perhaps the biggest cheers of the night came for Davidson County Sheriff 's Deputy Tripp Kester , who spoke while wearing his sheriff 's office uniform . ''
`` I just want to personally and publicly go on record supporting this resolution before us , this evening , '' Deputy Kester began , saying , '' it 's simple , '' before making his case .
`` The Constitution needs no explanation .
It 's been enforced for several hundred years now .
It 's easy to understand .
It says what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says .
And the last time I read the Declaration of Independence , it specifically reminds all of us that we 're endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights , which means God-given . ''
`` Among these , life , liberty , and the pursuit of happiness , '' Kester continued .
`` And that governments are instituted among men specifically to secure our God-given rights .
And it says when government becomes destructive to these ends — meaning that they go above and beyond trying to secure our liberties and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the right of the people to alter or abolish that government , either by voting or ultimately , God forbid , to use our Second Amendment rights to protect ourselves from tyranny . ''
Deputy Kester then called for the Board of Commissioners to join the counties of Cherokee , Lincoln , Rowan , Stokes , Surry , and Wilkes in becoming Second Amendment sanctuaries .
`` Publicly demonstrate to us that you 're willing to uphold and honor the same oath I took when I put my hand on God 's Word @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Him and swore that I 'd give my life to defend that Constitution , '' Kester told the commission , adding that he was `` not trying to be disrespectful , but regardless of what you all do or do n't do , I 'm not going to enforce an unconstitutional law . ''
The room erupted with applause at that point , and the deputy received a standing ovation .

From the Blaze:
A sheriff's deputy in Davidson County, North Carolina, delivered a powerful speech in defense of the Second Amendment Tuesday, before the county's Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to declare the county a Second Amendment sanctuary as the country watches Virginia's Democrat-controlled legislature's plans to impose a series of gun control measures.
The Winston-Salem Journal reported that 20 people spoke before commissioners and a "standing-room-only crowd of more than 150." Each person who made a statement was in favor of the proposed resolution to make Davidson County a Second Amendment sanctuary.
According to the newspaper, "perhaps the biggest cheers of the night came for Davidson County Sheriff's Deputy Tripp Kester, who spoke while wearing his sheriff's office uniform."
"I just want to personally and publicly go on record supporting this resolution before us, this evening," Deputy Kester began, saying,"it's simple," before making his case.
"The Constitution needs no explanation. It's been enforced for several hundred years now. It's easy to understand. It says what it means, and means what it says. And the last time I read the Declaration of Independence, it specifically reminds all of us that we're endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, which means God-given."
"Among these, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," Kester continued. "And that governments are instituted among men specifically to secure our God-given rights. And it says when government becomes destructive to these ends — meaning that they go above and beyond trying to secure our liberties and trying to take them — it's the right of the people to alter or abolish that government, either by voting or ultimately, God forbid, to use our Second Amendment rights to protect ourselves from tyranny."
Deputy Kester then called for the Board of Commissioners to join the counties of Cherokee, Lincoln, Rowan, Stokes, Surry, and Wilkes in becoming Second Amendment sanctuaries.
"Publicly demonstrate to us that you're willing to uphold and honor the same oath I took when I put my hand on God's Word and held my other hand up to Him and swore that I'd give my life to defend that Constitution," Kester told the commission, adding that he was "not trying to be disrespectful, but regardless of what you all do or don't do, I'm not going to enforce an unconstitutional law."
The room erupted with applause at that point, and the deputy received a standing ovation.


welovetrump--2020-01-22--Politico: Schiff May Have Mischaracterized Parnas Evidence, According To Unredacted Docs

Here 's more details on Schiff being caught in seemingly another lie from the Politico report : House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga , according to documents obtained by POLITICO — a possible error the GOP will likely criticize as another example of the Democrats ’ rushed effort to impeach President Donald Trump .
The issue arose when Schiff ( D-Calif. ) sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler ( D-N.Y. ) last week summarizing a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas , an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ personal attorney Rudy Giuliani .
In one section of the letter , Schiff claims that Parnas “ continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky , ” citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani : “ trying to get us mr Z.
” The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff ’ s letter — was redacted .
But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later , Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Burisma , followed by a text message to Giuliani that states : “ mr Z answers my brother.
” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky .
The word document contains a series of questions and answers , but does n't identify who is doing the asking or answering .
Yet the questions center on the hiring practices at Burisma , while the responses include statements such as `` we wanted to build Burisma as [ an ] international company ” and `` we also thought it would help in Ukraine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” which seems to point to Zlochevsky — not the Ukrainian president — as the respondent .
The apparent mischaracterization , however , does not undercut Democrats ' argument that Trump withheld critical military aid to Ukraine as a way to pressure Zelenksy into opening up investigations into the Bidens , including Joe Biden ’ s son Hunter , who was once a board member on Burisma , a Ukrainian natural gas company .
A Democratic official working on the impeachment trial didn ’ t dispute the suggestion that the initial interpretation was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ z ” was commonly used as short-hand for “ Zelensky ” by those involved in the Ukraine pressure campaign , and noted that the word document does not reveal its author or source .

According to new unredacted documents reported on by Politico, Adam Schiff may have mischaracterized a text message Democrats tried to use as evidence against Trump.
Last week, Schiff sent a letter to Jerry Nadler with the intention of summarizing “evidence” from Lev Parnas, who was Guiliani’s former associate.
Schiff pulled up a text message from Parnas to Giuliani that said “trying to get us mr Z” and claimed it referred to Ukrainian President Zelensky.
However, a just-unredacted document showing the full exchange between Parnas and Giuliani contains notes of an interview with founder of Burisma Mykola Zlochevsky and another text message about “Mr Z” seeming to refer to Zlochevsky, whom Parnas interviewed a few days after the original text – a crucial detail which Schiff apparently chose to ignore and changes up his whole story!
Take a look at the breaking news:


welovetrump--2020-01-22--Biden Threatens To Fire Any ICE Agent Who Deports An Illegal Immigrant For Drunk Driving

Apparently , Joe Biden doesn ’ t , in his own words , “ count drunk driving as a felony @ @ @ @ @ immigrants should be deported for it .
In fact , Biden thinks that any ICE @ @ @ @ @ an illegal immigrant drunk driver should be fired…and that ’ s his latest campaign promise @ @ @ @ @ make this stuff up , folks .
See for yourself :

Apparently, Joe Biden doesn’t, in his own words, “count drunk driving as a felony” or believe that illegal immigrants should be deported for it.
In fact, Biden thinks that any ICE agent who arrests and deports an illegal immigrant drunk driver should be fired…and that’s his latest campaign promise!
You can’t make this stuff up, folks.
See for yourself:


welovetrump--2020-01-22--Schumer’s 7th Impeachment Amendment Gets Voted Down By Senate, Just Like Other 6

Bloomberg has more on how the impeachment trial has gone for Schumer and the Dems so far : Donald Trump ’ s impeachment trial began Tuesday , making him the third president in U.S. history to face possible removal from office by the Senate .
He is charged with abusing his office and obstructing the House investigation of his actions .
Here are the latest developments : Republicans Stick Together on Trial Rules ( 12:02 a.m. ) The Senate voted 53-47 to shelve the seventh amendment from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer , continuing a long day of straight party-line @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s impeachment trial .
Schumer then offered his eighth amendment , calling for the Senate to subpoena former National Security Adviser John Bolton .
The Senate voted by the same party-line margin , 53-47 , to shelve Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer ’ s sixth amendment to the resolution that will set the rules for the Senate trial .
Schumer previously rejected a request from McConnell to bundle his amendments together to speed the procedural debate .
Democrats said the discussion about calling witnesses and seeking new evidence is too important to cut @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its 10th hour , Schumer offered a seventh amendment regarding the admission of evidence .
All 53 Republican senators voted to shelve the fifth amendment from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer , which would have subpoenaed documents from the Department of Defense .
They overruled the 47 Democratic senators who wanted to include Schumer ’ s amendment to the trial rules offered by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell .
House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff , one of the impeachment managers , acknowledged that the night was getting long for senators who had been in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he said “ it ’ s not our job to make it easy for you ” to disagree with calls for additional testimony .
Schumer then offered a sixth amendment to subpoena two additional Trump administration officials .
The Senate once again voted on strict party lines to reject a Democratic amendment to subpoena acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney to testify in the impeachment trial .
Mulvaney is one of four Trump administration officials that Democrats say they want to call .
The vote was 53-47 .
Senate Minority Leader @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amendment to the resolution setting trial rules , which would have the Senate subpoena documents from the Department of Defense related to Trump ’ s hold on aid for Ukraine .
The Senate rejected the third Democratic amendment , which would have subpoenaed documents from the White House Office of Management and Budget .
The vote again was 53-47 .
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer then offered an amendment that would require a subpoena for testimony from acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney .
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ move to block it .
The Senate now will take a break until 8 p.m. for dinner before continuing into the evening .
The House managers and the White House team sparred Tuesday over how seriously House Democrats tried to get testimony from Trump ’ s former National Security Advisor John Bolton before the Senate trial began .
Lead House manager Adam Schiff disputed a claim by Trump ’ s lawyers that the House needs the Senate to help put together its case against the president by insisting on subpoenas for witnesses and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ready to prosecute its case .
“ The House calls John Bolton !
” said Schiff .
And , referring to the acting White House chief of staff , he added , “ The House calls Mick Mulvaney !
” Trump lawyer Pat Cipollone responded that Schiff may be making such declarations now , but that House investigators declined to subpoena Bolton during the House investigation .
“ And now they come here and they ask you to issue a subpoena for John Bolton .
It ’ s not right , ” Cipollone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House did invite Bolton to testify , but that Bolton ’ s lawyer said he wouldn ’ t appear and would sue if the House subpoenaed him .
Now , said Schiff , Bolton is willing to testify .
“ I can ’ t speak to his motivation , ” said Schiff .
But he said that Bolton , for whatever reason , is now willing to testify .
The Senate rejected Minority Leader Chuck Schumer ’ s amendment that would subpoena State Department documents on another 53-47 party-line vote .
Democratic House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the amendment , saying that Trump ordered his administration “ to defy every subpoena.
” “ The president engaged in this coverup because he is guilty and he knows it , ” said Demings of Florida , who served as Orlando ’ s first female police chief .
She said the Senate needs to see State Department officials ’ text and WhatsApp messages , emails and notes .
The agency has gathered the records and they ’ re ready to be turned over , Demings said .
Schumer proposed a third amendment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House Office of Management and Budget .
-- Laura Litvan , Steven T. Dennis The Senate blocked Minority Leader Chuck Schumer ’ s amendment that would subpoena White House documents about the Trump administration ’ s actions on Ukraine .
The vote was 53-47 .
Schumer offered another amendment that would subpoena State Department documents related to the articles of impeachment .
A statement from his office said the Trump administration prevented the State Department from turning over “ highly relevant records and communications ” that could shed light on the events in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his office .
-- Laura Litvan , Steven T. Dennis House impeachment manager Zoe Lofgren argued that Minority Leader Chuck Schumer ’ s amendment to subpoena White House documents would produce vital evidence that could get at the truth behind the allegations about Trump ’ s decision to delay aid to Ukraine .
Getting the documents “ would ensure a fair , legitimate trial based on the full evidentiary record , ” Lofgren said .
While she insisted the House had already produced “ powerful ” evidence that Trump is guilty of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refused to produce key witnesses or documents .
Lofgren is the first female House impeachment manager to speak at a presidential impeachment trial .
“ The amendment prevents the president from hiding evidence , as he has previously tried to do , ” Lofgren said .
She argued that the “ most important documents ” in the investigation would come from the White House .
She said those documents would reveal the extent of the administration ’ s coordination with people who acted on Trump ’ s behalf in Ukraine , and how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney , helped set up the deal by withholding the aid from Ukraine .
-- Laura Litvan , Steven T. Dennis Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer introduced an amendment that would order the White House to produce what could be thousands of pages of documents related to the charges against Trump , including material from Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney .
That includes any records related to meetings or calls between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy , and any inquiries regarding Ukraine including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ son Hunter and Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings , on whose board Hunter Biden served .
Other records that would be subpoenaed include those of then-White House National Security Advisor John Bolton and Robert Blair , a Mulvaney adviser , that relate to any efforts to coerce Ukraine ’ s leaders to investigate Biden in exchange for U.S. military assistance and a meeting between Zelenskiy and Trump .
In addition , the amendment seeks records related to efforts by Trump personal attorney Rudy Giuliani and his associates regarding the decision to recall former @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
-- Laura Litvan , Steven T. Dennis

Bloomberg has more on how the impeachment trial has gone for Schumer and the Dems so far:
Donald Trump’s impeachment trial began Tuesday, making him the third president in U.S. history to face possible removal from office by the Senate. He is charged with abusing his office and obstructing the House investigation of his actions.
Here are the latest developments:
Republicans Stick Together on Trial Rules (12:02 a.m.)
The Senate voted 53-47 to shelve the seventh amendment from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, continuing a long day of straight party-line votes on the rules for Trump’s impeachment trial.
Schumer then offered his eighth amendment, calling for the Senate to subpoena former National Security Adviser John Bolton.
Late-Night Amendment Again Shelved by GOP (11:17 p.m.)
The Senate voted by the same party-line margin, 53-47, to shelve Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s sixth amendment to the resolution that will set the rules for the Senate trial.
Schumer previously rejected a request from McConnell to bundle his amendments together to speed the procedural debate. Democrats said the discussion about calling witnesses and seeking new evidence is too important to cut short.
With the debate stretching into its 10th hour, Schumer offered a seventh amendment regarding the admission of evidence.
GOP Votes Down Another Democratic Amendment (10:29 p.m.)
All 53 Republican senators voted to shelve the fifth amendment from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, which would have subpoenaed documents from the Department of Defense. They overruled the 47 Democratic senators who wanted to include Schumer’s amendment to the trial rules offered by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, one of the impeachment managers, acknowledged that the night was getting long for senators who had been in the chamber since 1 p.m. But he said “it’s not our job to make it easy for you” to disagree with calls for additional testimony.
Schumer then offered a sixth amendment to subpoena two additional Trump administration officials.
GOP Shelves Amendment to Call Mulvaney (9:27 p.m.)
The Senate once again voted on strict party lines to reject a Democratic amendment to subpoena acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney to testify in the impeachment trial. Mulvaney is one of four Trump administration officials that Democrats say they want to call. The vote was 53-47.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer will also offered a fifth amendment to the resolution setting trial rules, which would have the Senate subpoena documents from the Department of Defense related to Trump’s hold on aid for Ukraine.
Third Democratic Amendment Rejected by GOP (7:32 p.m.)
The Senate rejected the third Democratic amendment, which would have subpoenaed documents from the White House Office of Management and Budget. The vote again was 53-47.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer then offered an amendment that would require a subpoena for testimony from acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that after debate on the amendment, he will move to block it.
The Senate now will take a break until 8 p.m. for dinner before continuing into the evening.
Both Sides Spar Over Bolton Testimony (6:56 p.m.)
The House managers and the White House team sparred Tuesday over how seriously House Democrats tried to get testimony from Trump’s former National Security Advisor John Bolton before the Senate trial began.
Lead House manager Adam Schiff disputed a claim by Trump’s lawyers that the House needs the Senate to help put together its case against the president by insisting on subpoenas for witnesses and documents. Schiff said the House is ready to prosecute its case.
“The House calls John Bolton!” said Schiff. And, referring to the acting White House chief of staff, he added, “The House calls Mick Mulvaney!”
Trump lawyer Pat Cipollone responded that Schiff may be making such declarations now, but that House investigators declined to subpoena Bolton during the House investigation.
“And now they come here and they ask you to issue a subpoena for John Bolton. It’s not right,” Cipollone said.
Later, Schiff said the House did invite Bolton to testify, but that Bolton’s lawyer said he wouldn’t appear and would sue if the House subpoenaed him.
Now, said Schiff, Bolton is willing to testify.
“I can’t speak to his motivation,” said Schiff. But he said that Bolton, for whatever reason, is now willing to testify.
Schumer Bid to Seek State Documents Rejected (6:31 p.m.)
The Senate rejected Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s amendment that would subpoena State Department documents on another 53-47 party-line vote.
Democratic House manager Val Demings had argued in favor of the amendment, saying that Trump ordered his administration “to defy every subpoena.”
“The president engaged in this coverup because he is guilty and he knows it,” said Demings of Florida, who served as Orlando’s first female police chief.
She said the Senate needs to see State Department officials’ text and WhatsApp messages, emails and notes. The agency has gathered the records and they’re ready to be turned over, Demings said.
Schumer proposed a third amendment that would subpoena documents from the White House Office of Management and Budget. -- Laura Litvan, Steven T. Dennis
GOP Defeats First Schumer Amendment to Rules (4:39 p.m.)
The Senate blocked Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s amendment that would subpoena White House documents about the Trump administration’s actions on Ukraine. The vote was 53-47.
Schumer offered another amendment that would subpoena State Department documents related to the articles of impeachment.
A statement from his office said the Trump administration prevented the State Department from turning over “highly relevant records and communications” that could shed light on the events in Ukraine underpinning the charge that Trump abused his office. -- Laura Litvan, Steven T. Dennis
Documents Vital to Fair Trial, Democrat Says (3:46 p.m.)
House impeachment manager Zoe Lofgren argued that Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s amendment to subpoena White House documents would produce vital evidence that could get at the truth behind the allegations about Trump’s decision to delay aid to Ukraine.
Getting the documents “would ensure a fair, legitimate trial based on the full evidentiary record,” Lofgren said.
While she insisted the House had already produced “powerful” evidence that Trump is guilty of the two articles, the White House has refused to produce key witnesses or documents.
Lofgren is the first female House impeachment manager to speak at a presidential impeachment trial.
“The amendment prevents the president from hiding evidence, as he has previously tried to do,” Lofgren said. She argued that the “most important documents” in the investigation would come from the White House.
She said those documents would reveal the extent of the administration’s coordination with people who acted on Trump’s behalf in Ukraine, and how key players in the White House, including acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, helped set up the deal by withholding the aid from Ukraine. -- Laura Litvan, Steven T. Dennis
Schumer Urges Senate to Subpoena Documents (2:51 p.m.)
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer introduced an amendment that would order the White House to produce what could be thousands of pages of documents related to the charges against Trump, including material from Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney.
That includes any records related to meetings or calls between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, and any inquiries regarding Ukraine including those related to Joe Biden, his son Hunter and Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings, on whose board Hunter Biden served.
Other records that would be subpoenaed include those of then-White House National Security Advisor John Bolton and Robert Blair, a Mulvaney adviser, that relate to any efforts to coerce Ukraine’s leaders to investigate Biden in exchange for U.S. military assistance and a meeting between Zelenskiy and Trump.
In addition, the amendment seeks records related to efforts by Trump personal attorney Rudy Giuliani and his associates regarding the decision to recall former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch. -- Laura Litvan, Steven T. Dennis


welovetrump--2020-01-22--Ivanka Trump Snubs Jim Acosta’s Impeachment Questions In Davos, Switzerland

Ivanka Trump kicked Jim Acosta ’ s massive ego down a peg or two earlier today in Davos , Switzerland @ @ @ @ @ her down asking her to comment on her father ’ s Senate impeachment trial .
@ @ @ @ @ want to and wasn ’ t going to talk to the CNN reporter who constantly @ @ @ @ @ She completely ignored Acosta and classfully walked away , giving Acosta exactly what he deserved @

Ivanka Trump kicked Jim Acosta’s massive ego down a peg or two earlier today in Davos, Switzerland, where Acosta rudely chased her down asking her to comment on her father’s Senate impeachment trial.
But Ivanka didn’t want to and wasn’t going to talk to the CNN reporter who constantly rails against her family.
She completely ignored Acosta and classfully walked away, giving Acosta exactly what he deserved.
Check it out:


welovetrump--2020-01-23--Joe Biden Snaps at CBS Reporter:  “Why, Why, Why, Why Why!”

So many people have asked `` how would the media respond if it were Trump who did this ? ''
I think they 'd have probably had him committed by now !
So how will they respond to Biden ?
Maybe instead of `` Joe 303303030303 '' he will now be known as `` Joe Why Why Why '' .
Here 's what our friends over at The Hill reported : Joe Biden told a CBS reporter to `` calm down '' after he asked the former vice president why he had attacked Sen. Bernie Sanders ( I-Vt. ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Democratic presidential nomination .
`` Yesterday , you said you accepted Bernie 's apology , now you 're attacking him , '' said Ed O'Keefe , the veteran reporter covering the 2020 presidential campaign for the network .
`` Why are you doing that ?
Why was n't his apology enough , Mr. Vice President ?
Why attack Sanders ? ''
After the last question , Biden , who had been ready to leave the press area , turned back to O'Keefe with a wide-eyed expression and walked back toward him .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ why , why , why , why ? ''
Biden said , waving his hands toward O'Keefe and bending toward him slightly .
`` You 're getting nervous , man .
Calm down , it 's OK ! ''
Biden said , putting his hands gently on O'Keefe 's shoulder .
`` He apologized for saying I was corrupt , he did n't say anything about whether or not I was telling the truth about Social Security , '' Biden then states , as O'Keefe recorded the conversation .
Biden proceeded to give @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fist before leaving the area .
Biden and Sanders have been battling over Social Security and an op-ed by a supporter of Sanders who called Biden corrupt .
Sanders apologized for the op-ed , but his campaign has pressed forward with its argument that Biden had supported efforts to cut Social Security .
Biden says he had only supported efforts to fix Social Security .
Earlier Wednesday on MSNBC 's `` Morning Joe , '' Biden accused Sanders and his campaign of taking statements he 'd made about Social Security decades ago out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amazing that we go back and look at statements and many of them , most of them [ are ] taken out of context of 10 , 30 , 35 years ago , '' Biden told co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski .

So many people have asked "how would the media respond if it were Trump who did this?"
I think they'd have probably had him committed by now!
So how will they respond to Biden?
Time will tell.
Maybe instead of "Joe 303303030303" he will now be known as "Joe Why Why Why".
You're welcome Hannity.
Here's what our friends over at The Hill reported:


welovetrump--2020-01-23--President Trump Say “Very Big” Middle Class Tax Cut Coming!

A lot of people have criticized President Trump for giving a huge tax cut to businesses and only a smaller @ @ @ @ @ .
Those people don ’ t understand how necessary this was to stimulate a dying @ @ @ @ @ this has already had on the middle class .
But President Trump has not forgotten @ @ @ @ @ .
In fact , he just announced a “ very big ” middle class tax @ @ @ @ @ !

A lot of people have criticized President Trump for giving a huge tax cut to businesses and only a smaller one to the middle class.
Those people don’t understand how necessary this was to stimulate a dying economy.
And the impact this has already had on the middle class.
But President Trump has not forgotten about the middle class directly.
Nope.
In fact, he just announced a “very big” middle class tax cut is on the way!


welovetrump--2020-01-23--Report Says Record-Breaking 100,000 Ticket Requests For Trump Rally in BLUE State New Jersey!

About 100,000 tickets have been requested for President Donald Trump ’ s rally at the Wildwoods Convention Center next week - the highest demand for any event the president has held , U.S. Rep. Jeff Van Drew told Fox News during an interview Sunday .
“ It ’ s been exciting and I ’ m proud to say for his event - of all the events he ’ s done in all the country - we ’ ve had the most ticket requests , ” said Van Drew , R-2nd Dist.
, who recently switched parties after losing support from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is slated to appear at the Wildwoods Convention Center at 7 p.m. on Jan. 28 .
Trump ’ s re-election campaign announced he was coming to Cape May County earlier this month to support Van Drew .
Van Drew was one of two Democratic congressman to vote against the president ’ s impeachment and changed parties officially soon after .
“ We ’ re proud to have him , ” Van Drew said .
“ It shows he cares about the big towns and big places and he also cars about the little @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jersey rally broke a record for ticket requests could not be independently verified .
While news organizations have reported on crowd sizes at other Trump rallies , news reports often do no include the number of people who requested tickets ahead of an event .
Tickets for the Wildwood rally were made available online for free .
Event organizers have said they are making plans for overflow crowds .
Wildwood Mayor Pete Byron said last week he had heard estimates that 40,000 tickets had been issued for an eventbeing held in a venue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is also the possibility another 10,000 may show up to the city .
About 150,000 people are in Wildwood on a typical summer day , a Cape May County spokeswoman said .
The city has about 5,000 year-round residents .

NJ.com reports:
About 100,000 tickets have been requested for President Donald Trump’s rally at the Wildwoods Convention Center next week - the highest demand for any event the president has held, U.S. Rep. Jeff Van Drew told Fox News during an interview Sunday.
“It’s been exciting and I’m proud to say for his event - of all the events he’s done in all the country - we’ve had the most ticket requests,” said Van Drew, R-2nd Dist., who recently switched parties after losing support from Democratic leaders for opposing impeachment.
Trump is slated to appear at the Wildwoods Convention Center at 7 p.m. on Jan. 28. Trump’s re-election campaign announced he was coming to Cape May County earlier this month to support Van Drew.
Van Drew was one of two Democratic congressman to vote against the president’s impeachment and changed parties officially soon after.
“We’re proud to have him,” Van Drew said. “It shows he cares about the big towns and big places and he also cars about the little places.”
The claim that the New Jersey rally broke a record for ticket requests could not be independently verified. While news organizations have reported on crowd sizes at other Trump rallies, news reports often do no include the number of people who requested tickets ahead of an event.
Tickets for the Wildwood rally were made available online for free. Event organizers have said they are making plans for overflow crowds.
Wildwood Mayor Pete Byron said last week he had heard estimates that 40,000 tickets had been issued for an eventbeing held in a venue that can hold 7,400 people. There is also the possibility another 10,000 may show up to the city.
About 150,000 people are in Wildwood on a typical summer day, a Cape May County spokeswoman said.
The city has about 5,000 year-round residents.


welovetrump--2020-01-23--21 State Attorneys General Band Together, Send Letter To U.S. Senate Demanding They REJECT Impeachme

21 State Attorneys General Band Together, Send Letter To U.S. Senate Demanding They REJECT Impeachment!

Fox News had more to report : The attorneys general of 21 states have come forward with a blistering rebuke of the impeachment of President Trump , asserting that it `` establishes a dangerous historical precedent . ''
The Republican attorneys general , in a letter submitted to the Senate Wednesday morning and obtained by Fox News , urged the chamber conducting Trump 's trial to `` reject '' the impeachment articles .
`` If not expressly repudiated by the Senate , the theories animating both Articles will set a precedent that is entirely contrary to the Framers ' design @ @ @ @ @ @ @ structure protections contained in our Constitution : the separation of powers , '' they wrote .
The letter accuses House Democrats of impeaching Trump as a politically motivated response to the 2016 election and warned that it poses a threat to the 2020 election as well .
`` Even an unsuccessful effort to impeach the President undermines the integrity of the 2020 presidential election because it weaponizes a process that should only be initiated in exceedingly rare circumstances and should never be used for partisan purposes , '' the letter continued .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impeachment articles themselves .
The abuse of power article , they claimed , `` is based upon a constitutionally-flawed theory '' that is `` infinitely expansive and subjective '' because it relies on the motivation the president had for `` exercising concededly lawful constitutional authority '' ( emphasis in original ) that Democrats deemed to be corrupt .
`` It can not be a legitimate basis to impeach a President for acting in a legal manner that may also be politically advantageous , '' they continued .
`` Such a standard would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President , past , present , and future . ''
The attorneys general claimed that the second article of impeachment , obstruction of Congress , is `` equally flawed , '' arguing that the House 's theory means that a president can be impeached for invoking executive privilege .
Doing so would render the privilege `` meaningless , '' they said , because it would place the privilege `` under unilateral control of the House . ''
Rather than impeach Trump for using privilege to block witnesses from testifying before the House 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to court to challenge the president and enforce subpoenas , they said .
The precedent set by this impeachment , they warned , `` will erode the separation of powers shared by the executive and legislative branches by subjugating future Presidents to the whims of the majority opposition party in the House of Representatives . ''
The letter comes as the trial moves into full swing , with opening arguments Wednesday following a heated floor session on the rules governing proceedings a day earlier .
House Democrats slammed Senate Republicans for turning back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , right out of the gate .

Fox News had more to report:
The attorneys general of 21 states have come forward with a blistering rebuke of the impeachment of President Trump, asserting that it "establishes a dangerous historical precedent."
The Republican attorneys general, in a letter submitted to the Senate Wednesday morning and obtained by Fox News, urged the chamber conducting Trump's trial to "reject" the impeachment articles.
"If not expressly repudiated by the Senate, the theories animating both Articles will set a precedent that is entirely contrary to the Framers' design and ruinous to the most important governmental structure protections contained in our Constitution: the separation of powers," they wrote.
The letter accuses House Democrats of impeaching Trump as a politically motivated response to the 2016 election and warned that it poses a threat to the 2020 election as well.
"Even an unsuccessful effort to impeach the President undermines the integrity of the 2020 presidential election because it weaponizes a process that should only be initiated in exceedingly rare circumstances and should never be used for partisan purposes," the letter continued.
The attorneys general proceeded to pick apart the impeachment articles themselves. The abuse of power article, they claimed, "is based upon a constitutionally-flawed theory" that is "infinitely expansive and subjective" because it relies on the motivation the president had for "exercising concededly lawful constitutional authority" (emphasis in original) that Democrats deemed to be corrupt.
"It cannot be a legitimate basis to impeach a President for acting in a legal manner that may also be politically advantageous," they continued. "Such a standard would be cause for the impeachment of virtually every President, past, present, and future."
The attorneys general claimed that the second article of impeachment, obstruction of Congress, is "equally flawed," arguing that the House's theory means that a president can be impeached for invoking executive privilege. Doing so would render the privilege "meaningless," they said, because it would place the privilege "under unilateral control of the House."
Rather than impeach Trump for using privilege to block witnesses from testifying before the House's impeachment inquiry, they should have gone to court to challenge the president and enforce subpoenas, they said.
The precedent set by this impeachment, they warned, "will erode the separation of powers shared by the executive and legislative branches by subjugating future Presidents to the whims of the majority opposition party in the House of Representatives."
The letter comes as the trial moves into full swing, with opening arguments Wednesday following a heated floor session on the rules governing proceedings a day earlier. House Democrats slammed Senate Republicans for turning back their calls for witnesses, for now, right out of the gate.


welovetrump--2020-01-23--Trump To Crack Down On Birth Tourism With New Visa Restrictions

President Trump is making his move to do something to stop the practice known as ‘ birth tourism ’ which @ @ @ @ @ from other countries travel to America in order to give birth so that their babies @ @ @ @ @ .
The main reason these women exploit such a loophole is to obtain a U.S. @ @ @ @ @ which is one of the most coveted in the world in terms of traveling ability @ @ @ @ @ a pathway towards getting the parents green cards .
So , the Trump administration is @ @ @ @ @ that would make it harder for women to travel to the U.S. while pregnant in @ @ @ @ @ practice altogether .
Check out the news on Twitter :

President Trump is making his move to do something to stop the practice known as ‘birth tourism’ which is essentially where pregnant women from other countries travel to America in order to give birth so that their babies are born with American citizenships.
The main reason these women exploit such a loophole is to obtain a U.S. passport for their newborn, which is one of the most coveted in the world in terms of traveling ability, and can act as a pathway towards getting the parents green cards.
So, the Trump administration is now proposing new visa rules that would make it harder for women to travel to the U.S. while pregnant in order to curb the unfair practice altogether.
Check out the news on Twitter:


welovetrump--2020-01-23--Taylor Swift Hopes New Music Will “Stoke Fires Politically” Against “Sinister” Republicans

In the fall of 2018 , Swift finally comes out of the closet politically to intervene on behalf of Democrats in a midterm election in her home state of Tennessee .
As the Washington Post put it , this announcement “ fell like a hammer across the Trump-worshipping subforums of the far-right Internet , where people had convinced themselves… that the world-famous pop star was a secret MAGA fan.
” Donald Trump goes on camera to smirk that he now likes Swift ’ s music a little less .
The singer is successful in enlisting tens of thousands of young @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her senatorial candidate of choice , Democrat Phil Bredesen , loses to Republican Marsha Blackburn , whom she ’ d called out as a flagrant enemy of feminism and gay rights .
“ Definitely , that was a bigger disappointment for me , ” Swift says , pitting the midterm snub against the Grammy snub .
“ I think what ’ s going on out in the world is bigger than who gets a prize at the party.
” It was not always thus for Swift — as the detractors who dragged her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election eagerly pointed out .
If you had to pick the most embarrassing or regrettable moment in “ Miss Americana , ” it might be the TV clip from “ The Late Show With David Letterman ” in which the host brings up politics and gets Swift to essentially advocate the “ Shut up and sing ” mantra .
As the studio audience roars approval of her vow to stay apolitical , Letterman gives her what now looks like history ’ s most dated fist bump .
Thinking back on it , Swift @ @ @ @ @ @ @ didn ’ t speak up about politics as a young person , I was applauded for it , ” she says .
“ It was wild .
I said , ‘ I ’ m a 22-year-old girl — people don ’ t want to hear what I have to say about politics.
’ And people would just be like , ‘ Yeahhhhh !
’ ” At that point , Swift was already starting to record isolated pop tracks , taking baby steps that would soon turn into full strides away from her initial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on switching lanes or not , the lesson of the Dixie Chicks ’ forced exile after Natalie Maines ’ comment against then-President George W. Bush had branded itself onto her brain at an earlier age , when she ’ d just planted her young-teen flag in Nashville and overheard a lot of the lamentations of older Music Row songwriters about how the Chicks had thrown it all away .
“ I saw how one comment ended such a powerful reign , and it terrified me , ” says Swift .
“ These days @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be so mad about something one day and then forget what they were mad about a couple weeks later .
That ’ s fake outrage .
But what happened to the Dixie Chicks was real outrage .
I registered it — that you ’ re always one comment away from being done being able to make music.
” Maybe the most transfixing scene in “ Miss Americana ” is one where Swift argues with her father and other members of her team about the statement she ’ s about to release coming out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clear from her references to White House opposition to the Equality Act — Donald Trump too .
The comments were so spontaneous that Wilson wasn ’ t there to film the moment , but the director had asked people to turn on the camera if anything interesting transpired , and here it most certainly did .
“ For 12 years , we ’ ve not got involved in politics or religion , ” an unnamed associate says to Swift , suggesting that going down the road of standing against a president as well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have the effect of halving her audience on tour .
Her father chimes in : “ I ’ ve read the entire [ statement ] and … right now , I ’ m terrified .
I ’ m the guy that went out and bought armored cars.
” But Swift is adamant about pressing the button to send a nearly internet-breaking Instagram post , saying that Blackburn has voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act as well as LGBTQ-friendly bills : “ I can ’ t see another commercial [ with ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ Tennessee Christian values.
’ I live in Tennessee .
I am Christian .
That ’ s not what we stand for.
” Pushing back tears , she laments not having come out against Trump two years earlier , “ but I can ’ t change that .
… I need to be on the right side of history .
… Dad , I need you to forgive me for doing it , because I ’ m doing it.
” Says Swift now , “ This was a situation where , from a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moral compass was telling me I needed to do , I knew I was right , and I really didn ’ t care about repercussions.
” She understands why she faced such heated opposition in the room : “ My dad is terrified of threats against my safety and my life , and he has to see how many stalkers we deal with on a daily basis , and know that this is his kid .
It ’ s where he comes from.
” Swift was recently announced as the recipient of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ name-checked the org in her basher-bashing single “ You Need to Calm Down , ” which was released as one of the teaser tracks for last fall ’ s more outwardly directed and socially conscious “ Lover ” album .
Part of her politicization , she says , is feeling it would be hypocritical to hang out with her gay friends while leaving them to their own devices politically .
In the film , she says , “ I think it is so frilly and spineless of me to stand onstage and go @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ’ and then not say this , when someone ’ s literally coming for their neck.
” A year and a half later , she elaborates : “ To celebrate but not advocate felt wrong for me .
Using my voice to try to advocate was the only choice to make .
Because I ’ ve talked about equality and sung about it in songs like ‘ Welcome to New York , ’ but we are at a point where human rights are being violated .
When you ’ re saying that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a restaurant because of who they love or how they identify , and these are actual policies that certain politicians vocally stand behind , and they disguise them as family values , that is sinister .
So , so dark .
”

Here's more from Swift's Variety interview:
In the fall of 2018, Swift finally comes out of the closet politically to intervene on behalf of Democrats in a midterm election in her home state of Tennessee. As the Washington Post put it, this announcement “fell like a hammer across the Trump-worshipping subforums of the far-right Internet, where people had convinced themselves… that the world-famous pop star was a secret MAGA fan.” Donald Trump goes on camera to smirk that he now likes Swift’s music a little less. The singer is successful in enlisting tens of thousands of young people to register to vote, but her senatorial candidate of choice, Democrat Phil Bredesen, loses to Republican Marsha Blackburn, whom she’d called out as a flagrant enemy of feminism and gay rights.
“Definitely, that was a bigger disappointment for me,” Swift says, pitting the midterm snub against the Grammy snub. “I think what’s going on out in the world is bigger than who gets a prize at the party.”
It was not always thus for Swift — as the detractors who dragged her for staying quiet during the last presidential election eagerly pointed out. If you had to pick the most embarrassing or regrettable moment in “Miss Americana,” it might be the TV clip from “The Late Show With David Letterman” in which the host brings up politics and gets Swift to essentially advocate the “Shut up and sing” mantra. As the studio audience roars approval of her vow to stay apolitical, Letterman gives her what now looks like history’s most dated fist bump.
Thinking back on it, Swift is incredulous. “Every time I didn’t speak up about politics as a young person, I was applauded for it,” she says. “It was wild. I said, ‘I’m a 22-year-old girl — people don’t want to hear what I have to say about politics.’ And people would just be like, ‘Yeahhhhh!’”
At that point, Swift was already starting to record isolated pop tracks, taking baby steps that would soon turn into full strides away from her initial genre. But whether she had designs on switching lanes or not, the lesson of the Dixie Chicks’ forced exile after Natalie Maines’ comment against then-President George W. Bush had branded itself onto her brain at an earlier age, when she’d just planted her young-teen flag in Nashville and overheard a lot of the lamentations of older Music Row songwriters about how the Chicks had thrown it all away.
“I saw how one comment ended such a powerful reign, and it terrified me,” says Swift. “These days, with social media, people can be so mad about something one day and then forget what they were mad about a couple weeks later. That’s fake outrage. But what happened to the Dixie Chicks was real outrage. I registered it — that you’re always one comment away from being done being able to make music.”
Maybe the most transfixing scene in “Miss Americana” is one where Swift argues with her father and other members of her team about the statement she’s about to release coming out against Blackburn and — it’s clear from her references to White House opposition to the Equality Act — Donald Trump too. The comments were so spontaneous that Wilson wasn’t there to film the moment, but the director had asked people to turn on the camera if anything interesting transpired, and here it most certainly did.
“For 12 years, we’ve not got involved in politics or religion,” an unnamed associate says to Swift, suggesting that going down the road of standing against a president as well as Republican gubernatorial and Senate candidates could have the effect of halving her audience on tour. Her father chimes in: “I’ve read the entire [statement] and … right now, I’m terrified. I’m the guy that went out and bought armored cars.”
But Swift is adamant about pressing the button to send a nearly internet-breaking Instagram post, saying that Blackburn has voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act as well as LGBTQ-friendly bills: “I can’t see another commercial [with] her disguising these policies behind the words ‘Tennessee Christian values.’ I live in Tennessee. I am Christian. That’s not what we stand for.” Pushing back tears, she laments not having come out against Trump two years earlier, “but I can’t change that. … I need to be on the right side of history. … Dad, I need you to forgive me for doing it, because I’m doing it.”
Says Swift now, “This was a situation where, from a humanity perspective, and from what my moral compass was telling me I needed to do, I knew I was right, and I really didn’t care about repercussions.” She understands why she faced such heated opposition in the room: “My dad is terrified of threats against my safety and my life, and he has to see how many stalkers we deal with on a daily basis, and know that this is his kid. It’s where he comes from.”
Swift was recently announced as the recipient of a Vanguard Award from GLAAD, and she name-checked the org in her basher-bashing single “You Need to Calm Down,” which was released as one of the teaser tracks for last fall’s more outwardly directed and socially conscious “Lover” album. Part of her politicization, she says, is feeling it would be hypocritical to hang out with her gay friends while leaving them to their own devices politically. In the film, she says, “I think it is so frilly and spineless of me to stand onstage and go ‘Happy Pride Month, you guys,’ and then not say this, when someone’s literally coming for their neck.”
A year and a half later, she elaborates: “To celebrate but not advocate felt wrong for me. Using my voice to try to advocate was the only choice to make. Because I’ve talked about equality and sung about it in songs like ‘Welcome to New York,’ but we are at a point where human rights are being violated. When you’re saying that certain people can be kicked out of a restaurant because of who they love or how they identify, and these are actual policies that certain politicians vocally stand behind, and they disguise them as family values, that is sinister. So, so dark.”


welovetrump--2020-01-23--Susan Collins First Republican To Side With Dems, But Schumer Amendment Still Fails

The Hill has more to say on Collins being the only Republican to side with Dems on a Schumer amendment : Sen. Susan Collins ( Maine ) became the only GOP senator to break with her party during a marathon session over the rules for the Senate 's impeachment trial of President Trump .
Democrats forced a 10th amendment vote early Wednesday morning that would extend the amount of time House impeachment managers and Trump 's legal team have to respond to motions .
Currently , both sides can file motions around 9 a.m. , including a potential motion to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the rules , the opposing side would have to respond by 11 a.m .
The amendment by Democrats would extend that time , giving them until Thursday to respond .
A spokeswoman for Collins did n't immediately respond to a request for comment about why she broke with her party and voted against tabling the amendment .
The early morning vote came after the first nine amendment votes failed , with senators voting along party lines to table the proposals from Democrats , including attempts to subpoena former national security adviser John Bolton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mick Mulvaney .

The Hill has more to say on Collins being the only Republican to side with Dems on a Schumer amendment:
Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) became the only GOP senator to break with her party during a marathon session over the rules for the Senate's impeachment trial of President Trump.
Democrats forced a 10th amendment vote early Wednesday morning that would extend the amount of time House impeachment managers and Trump's legal team have to respond to motions.
Currently, both sides can file motions around 9 a.m., including a potential motion to dismiss the charges against Trump. Under the rules, the opposing side would have to respond by 11 a.m. The amendment by Democrats would extend that time, giving them until Thursday to respond.
A spokeswoman for Collins didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about why she broke with her party and voted against tabling the amendment.
The early morning vote came after the first nine amendment votes failed, with senators voting along party lines to table the proposals from Democrats, including attempts to subpoena former national security adviser John Bolton and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.


welovetrump--2020-01-23--Schumer Shoots Down Bolton-Biden Witness Trade Deal: “Off The Table”

Chuck Schumer has spent the better part of the Senate impeachment trial against President Trump trying to get amendments passed @ @ @ @ @ they want : to hear from more witnesses in a desperate attempt to dig up @ @ @ @ @ ’ t there .
So , Senate Republicans proposed a deal on witnesses that would @ @ @ @ @ as being a top witness , like John Bolton , in exchange for also bringing @ @ @ @ @ Biden .
But , Schumer has just struck down that idea , saying it ’ @ @ @ @ @ , ” seeming to confirm what many are suspecting…that Democrats are terrified of what would @ @ @ @ @ to testify !
Take a look at the breaking news on Twitter :

Chuck Schumer has spent the better part of the Senate impeachment trial against President Trump trying to get amendments passed that would give Democrats what they want: to hear from more witnesses in a desperate attempt to dig up evidence against Trump that isn’t there.
So, Senate Republicans proposed a deal on witnesses that would subpoena an official Democrats see as being a top witness, like John Bolton, in exchange for also bringing in either Hunter or Joe Biden.
But, Schumer has just struck down that idea, saying it’s “off the table,” seeming to confirm what many are suspecting…that Democrats are terrified of what would happen if a Biden were to testify!
Take a look at the breaking news on Twitter:


welovetrump--2020-01-23--President Trump Surprises Texas Gov. Greg Abbott: “You Want To Come With Us?”

The Washington Examiner had more : President Trump and Texas Gov .
Greg Abbott shared a warm moment as Trump departed from the World Economic Forum in Davos , Switzerland .
“ A candid moment with  @ realDonaldTrump as he departs the @ WEF Conference in Davos , ” Abbott said in a tweet , along with a video of the two Republican leaders hugging and sharing a few words .
`` There 's nobody like him , '' Trump can be heard saying about the governor after embracing him .
The tweet received over 9,000 retweets and over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump addressed the conference on Tuesday in a speech , during which he touted U.S. trade deals and the strong American economy .
`` Today , I 'm proud to declare the United States is in the midst of an economic boom , the likes of which the world has never seen before , '' the president told other world leaders .
`` America is thriving .
America is flourishing , and yes , America is winning again like never before . ''
Gov .
Abbot was in Davos to discuss the success @ @ @ @ @ @ @ At an early meeting of world energy leaders @ wef in @ Davos I explained that if Texas was its own country we ’ d be the 4th largest producer of oil in the world .
Texas succeeds because our focus is on free markets & innovation .
We also lead America in wind power generation , '' he tweeted .

The Washington Examiner had more:
President Trump and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott shared a warm moment as Trump departed from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
“A candid moment with @realDonaldTrump as he departs the @WEF Conference in Davos,” Abbott said in a tweet, along with a video of the two Republican leaders hugging and sharing a few words.
"There's nobody like him," Trump can be heard saying about the governor after embracing him.
The tweet received over 9,000 retweets and over 38,000 likes as of midday Wednesday.
Trump addressed the conference on Tuesday in a speech, during which he touted U.S. trade deals and the strong American economy.
"Today, I'm proud to declare the United States is in the midst of an economic boom, the likes of which the world has never seen before," the president told other world leaders. "America is thriving. America is flourishing, and yes, America is winning again like never before."
Gov. Abbot was in Davos to discuss the success of the economy in Texas.
"At an early meeting of world energy leaders @wef in @Davos I explained that if Texas was its own country we’d be the 4th largest producer of oil in the world. Texas succeeds because our focus is on free markets & innovation. We also lead America in wind power generation," he tweeted.


welovetrump--2020-01-24--DOJ Declass:  DOJ Finds Carter Page FISA Warrant Lacked Probable Cause!

At least two of the FBI ’ s surveillance applications to secretly monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page lacked probable cause , according to a newly declassified summary of a Justice Department assessment released Thursday by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ( FISC ) .
The DOJ 's admission essentially means that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ( FISA ) warrant authorizations to surveil Page , when stripped of the FBI 's misinformation , did not meet the necessary legal threshold and should never have been issued .
The June 2017 Page FISA warrant renewal , which was among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , was approved by then-Acting FBI Director ( and now CNN contributor ) Andrew McCabe , as well as former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein .
The April 2017 warrant renewal was approved by then-FBI Director James Comey .
“ Today ’ s unprecedented court filing represents another step on the road to recovery for America ’ s deeply damaged judicial system , '' Page said in a statement to Fox News .
`` I hope that this latest admission of guilt for these civil rights abuses by the Justice Department marks continued @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reputationally ruinous injuries.
” Added Iowa GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley , who previously chaired the Judiciary Committee : “ It ’ s about time .
It ’ s about time federal authorities entrusted with our most powerful and intrusive surveillance tools begin to own up to their failures and abuses , and take steps to restore public confidence .
... Time will tell if the department will continue working to fix its errors and restore trust that it won ’ t disregard Americans ’ civil liberties .
Its admission and cooperation with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ direction . ''
FISC Presiding Judge James Boasberg , in the Jan. 7 order that was published for the first time Thursday , further required the government to explain in a written statement by Jan. 28 the `` FBI 's handling of information '' obtained through the Page warrants and subsequent renewals .
Boasberg specifically noted the DOJ found `` there was insufficient predication to establish probable cause to believe that Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power '' because of the `` material misstatements and omissions '' in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ technically only covered two of the applications to renew the Page FISA warrant , the DOJ `` apparently does not take a position on the validity '' on the first two Page FISA applications , Boasberg said , seemingly indicating that the DOJ seemingly did not want to defend their legality either .
The government `` intends to sequester information acquired pursuant to those '' FISA applications `` in the same manner as information acquired pursuant to the subsequent dockets , '' the judge said .

From Fox News:
At least two of the FBI’s surveillance applications to secretly monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page lacked probable cause, according to a newly declassified summary of a Justice Department assessment released Thursday by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).
The DOJ's admission essentially means that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant authorizations to surveil Page, when stripped of the FBI's misinformation, did not meet the necessary legal threshold and should never have been issued.
The June 2017 Page FISA warrant renewal, which was among the two deemed invalid by the DOJ, was approved by then-Acting FBI Director (and now CNN contributor) Andrew McCabe, as well as former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The April 2017 warrant renewal was approved by then-FBI Director James Comey.
“Today’s unprecedented court filing represents another step on the road to recovery for America’s deeply damaged judicial system," Page said in a statement to Fox News. "I hope that this latest admission of guilt for these civil rights abuses by the Justice Department marks continued progress towards restoring justice and remedying these reputationally ruinous injuries.”
Added Iowa GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley, who previously chaired the Judiciary Committee: “It’s about time. It’s about time federal authorities entrusted with our most powerful and intrusive surveillance tools begin to own up to their failures and abuses, and take steps to restore public confidence. ... Time will tell if the department will continue working to fix its errors and restore trust that it won’t disregard Americans’ civil liberties. Its admission and cooperation with the FISC is a step in the right direction."
FISC Presiding Judge James Boasberg, in the Jan. 7 order that was published for the first time Thursday, further required the government to explain in a written statement by Jan. 28 the "FBI's handling of information" obtained through the Page warrants and subsequent renewals.
Boasberg specifically noted the DOJ found "there was insufficient predication to establish probable cause to believe that Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power" because of the "material misstatements and omissions" in the warrant applications.
Although the DOJ assessment technically only covered two of the applications to renew the Page FISA warrant, the DOJ "apparently does not take a position on the validity" on the first two Page FISA applications, Boasberg said, seemingly indicating that the DOJ seemingly did not want to defend their legality either. The government "intends to sequester information acquired pursuant to those" FISA applications "in the same manner as information acquired pursuant to the subsequent dockets," the judge said.


welovetrump--2020-01-24--Rudy Giuliani Says He Has Evidence of Biden Corruption and Threatens To Go Public With It

Here 's more , from the NY Post : Rudy Giuliani , the personal attorney for President Trump , threatened Thursday to go public with information that would expose corruption by 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden .
“ Everything I tried to tell the press last March is now coming out , and more .
I will now start to reveal the evidence directly to you , the People , ” the former New York mayor tweeted .
“ The Biden Family Enterprise made millions by selling public office .
Then when Joe was Obama ’ s Point Man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s claim that he could reveal evidence detrimental to the former vice president follows his offer to testify in Trump ’ s impeachment trial taking place in the Senate .
“ I would love to see a trial .
I ’ d love to be a witness – because I ’ m a potential witness in the trial – and explain to everyone the corruption that I found in Ukraine , that far out-surpasses any that I ’ ve ever seen before , involving Joe Biden and a lot of other Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The Cats Roundtable ” with radio host John Catsimatidis on AM 970 .
Giuliani , who is at the center of the impeachment trial for his work on behalf of Trump in Ukraine , has alleged that Biden pressured Ukrainian officials to fire a top prosecutor by withholding millions in guaranteed loans .
He claims that Biden took the action against Viktor Shokin because he was going to investigate Burisma Holdings , a Ukrainian company that employed Biden ’ s son Hunteron its board .
Joe Biden , during a campaign stop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , saying “ no one has suggested my son did anything wrong.
” “ There ’ s nobody that ’ s indicated there ’ s a single solitary thing that he did that was inappropriate , wrong … or anything other than the appearance .
It looked bad that he was there , ” Biden said , according to the Washington Post .
“ He acknowledges that he in fact made a mistake going on the board.
” READ MORE : CBS Publishes List of “ Clinton Associates Who Allegedly Died Mysteriously ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a lead role among House Democrats presenting the case against Trump , said Trump has been trying to pin corruption on the Bidens , noting that the president called for Ukraine and China to launch investigations into them .
Schiff used as one example Trump ’ s comments from Oct. 3 .
“ They should investigate the Bidens .
Because how does a company that ’ s newly formed and all these companies , if you look — and by the way , likewise , China should start an investigation into the Bidens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine , ” Trump told reporters on the White House ’ s South Lawn .

Here's more, from the NY Post:
Rudy Giuliani, the personal attorney for President Trump, threatened Thursday to go public with information that would expose corruption by 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.
“Everything I tried to tell the press last March is now coming out, and more. I will now start to reveal the evidence directly to you, the People,” the former New York mayor tweeted. “The Biden Family Enterprise made millions by selling public office. Then when Joe was Obama’s Point Man, they ALL made millions.”
Giuliani’s claim that he could reveal evidence detrimental to the former vice president follows his offer to testify in Trump’s impeachment trial taking place in the Senate.
“I would love to see a trial. I’d love to be a witness – because I’m a potential witness in the trial – and explain to everyone the corruption that I found in Ukraine, that far out-surpasses any that I’ve ever seen before, involving Joe Biden and a lot of other Democrats,” he said Sunday morning on “The Cats Roundtable” with radio host John Catsimatidis on AM 970.
Giuliani, who is at the center of the impeachment trial for his work on behalf of Trump in Ukraine, has alleged that Biden pressured Ukrainian officials to fire a top prosecutor by withholding millions in guaranteed loans.
He claims that Biden took the action against Viktor Shokin because he was going to investigate Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian company that employed Biden’s son Hunteron its board.
Joe Biden, during a campaign stop in Iowa on Wednesday, defended Hunter, saying “no one has suggested my son did anything wrong.”
“There’s nobody that’s indicated there’s a single solitary thing that he did that was inappropriate, wrong … or anything other than the appearance. It looked bad that he was there,” Biden said, according to the Washington Post. “He acknowledges that he in fact made a mistake going on the board.”
READ MORE: CBS Publishes List of “Clinton Associates Who Allegedly Died Mysteriously”
Rep. Adam Schiff, who is playing a lead role among House Democrats presenting the case against Trump, said Trump has been trying to pin corruption on the Bidens, noting that the president called for Ukraine and China to launch investigations into them.
Schiff used as one example Trump’s comments from Oct. 3.
“They should investigate the Bidens. Because how does a company that’s newly formed and all these companies, if you look — and by the way, likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens. Because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine,” Trump told reporters on the White House’s South Lawn.


welovetrump--2020-01-24--USA Today Op Ed Asks:  “Should Trump get a third term if he’s impeached and acquitted?”

The ill-considered impeachment efforts against President Donald Trump have seriously interfered with his first term as president .
Thus , argues constitutional scholar William Mattox in The Wall Street Journal , if acquitted , Trump should be eligible for a third term , notwithstanding the two-term limit in the 22nd Amendment .
Mattox deploys a sports analogy : “ In the National Football League , teams can challenge a call on the field — but there ’ s a risk .
If instant replay doesn ’ t merit overturning the call , the challenging team loses one of its three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ keeps the game flowing , while also providing a way to reverse egregious errors.
” Hence , a third term for the president : “ That would allow him to make up for the time lost advancing the agenda that voters elected him to enact .
It would preserve impeachment for genuine offenses but discourage its use for disputed ones and for mere politics .
Absent such an amendment , and in an era when government is divided more often than not , impeachment seems likely to become an increasingly common means of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ radical , but actually , he ’ s a piker : He wants to accomplish this shift via a constitutional amendment .
How old-fashioned .
Doesn ’ t he know that the Constitution is a living thing , made to grow and change with the times ?
Over the past century , we have made dramatic changes in the extent of federal power , the redistricting of state legislatures , the constitutionalization of abortion and contraception and gay marriage , and much , much more , all without the tedious necessity of an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wait , you might ask — if a “ living , breathing Constitution ” would allow a third term after acquittal on impeachment , why didn ’ t President Bill Clinton , who was impeached but not removed over lying in a deposition , get a third term ?
Simple enough : He didn ’ t try .
And perhaps the Constitution hadn ’ t lived and breathed quite enough yet , in those primitive days of the 1990s .
However , had Clinton done so , he probably could have found some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ favor .
( A few names come to mind right away . )
But , of course , if Trump were eligible for a third term in 2024 , then I suppose Bill would perforce be as well , setting up — as Mattox notes — the possibility of another Trump/Clinton contest in 2024 , just with a different Clinton .
( Hey , it ’ s not crazy : Bill Clinton is a bit younger than Trump , and both are younger than Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders ) .

From the USA Today:
The ill-considered impeachment efforts against President Donald Trump have seriously interfered with his first term as president. Thus, argues constitutional scholar William Mattox in The Wall Street Journal, if acquitted, Trump should be eligible for a third term, notwithstanding the two-term limit in the 22nd Amendment.
Mattox deploys a sports analogy: “In the National Football League, teams can challenge a call on the field — but there’s a risk. If instant replay doesn’t merit overturning the call, the challenging team loses one of its three timeouts. That discourages frivolous challenges and keeps the game flowing, while also providing a way to reverse egregious errors.”
Hence, a third term for the president: “That would allow him to make up for the time lost advancing the agenda that voters elected him to enact. It would preserve impeachment for genuine offenses but discourage its use for disputed ones and for mere politics. Absent such an amendment, and in an era when government is divided more often than not, impeachment seems likely to become an increasingly common means of opposition.”
Third terms, no amendment needed?
Mattox’s proposal sounds radical, but actually, he’s a piker: He wants to accomplish this shift via a constitutional amendment. How old-fashioned. Doesn’t he know that the Constitution is a living thing, made to grow and change with the times? Over the past century, we have made dramatic changes in the extent of federal power, the redistricting of state legislatures, the constitutionalization of abortion and contraception and gay marriage, and much, much more, all without the tedious necessity of an actual amendment to the Constitution.
But wait, you might ask — if a “living, breathing Constitution” would allow a third term after acquittal on impeachment, why didn’t President Bill Clinton, who was impeached but not removed over lying in a deposition, get a third term? Simple enough: He didn’t try. And perhaps the Constitution hadn’t lived and breathed quite enough yet, in those primitive days of the 1990s.
However, had Clinton done so, he probably could have found some left-leaning legal scholars to argue in his favor. (A few names come to mind right away.) But, of course, if Trump were eligible for a third term in 2024, then I suppose Bill would perforce be as well, setting up — as Mattox notes — the possibility of another Trump/Clinton contest in 2024, just with a different Clinton. (Hey, it’s not crazy: Bill Clinton is a bit younger than Trump, and both are younger than Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders).


welovetrump--2020-01-24--Nadler Argues Trump Worse Than Nixon: “Not America First…Donald Trump First”

Fox News has more on this : House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler Thursday accused President Trump of putting his own personal interests above national security and American democracy and charged that Trump is the only president in history to violate his oath of office so flagrantly .
“ No president has ever used his office to compel a foreign nation to help him cheat in our elections -- prior presidents would be shocked to the core by such conduct and rightly so , ” Rep. Nadler , D-N.Y. , said in kicking off day two of the House impeachment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conduct is not America First , ” Nadler said , borrowing Trump ’ s campaign slogan .
“ It is Donald Trump first.
” Once Trump was caught pressuring Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election by seeking investigations into Joe and Hunter Biden , he launched an unprecedented effort to stonewall Congress ’ inquiry by denying documents and witnesses , Nadler charged .
“ It puts even President Nixon to shame , ” Nadler said .
Nadler 's tough talk set the scene for the second of three days of the House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a deep dive on the first article of impeachment , abuse of power .
On the first day of the opening arguments , Rep. Adam Schiff and his team used more than seven hours to make their case .
That left 16 hours and 42 minutes on the opening statement clock between Thursday and Friday for the House Democrats .
Then on Saturday , Trump 's lawyers take the floor .
As the public case continued before the camera , another political campaign was underway behind the scenes over the issue of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ four GOP senators to join them in demanding new evidence in the trial , but Republicans are actively trying to avoid any GOP defections .
No new witnesses would mean a speedy trial and a quicker vote to acquit the president .

Fox News has more on this:
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler Thursday accused President Trump of putting his own personal interests above national security and American democracy and charged that Trump is the only president in history to violate his oath of office so flagrantly.
“No president has ever used his office to compel a foreign nation to help him cheat in our elections -- prior presidents would be shocked to the core by such conduct and rightly so,” Rep. Nadler, D-N.Y., said in kicking off day two of the House impeachment managers' opening statements.
“This conduct is not America First,” Nadler said, borrowing Trump’s campaign slogan. “It is Donald Trump first.”
Once Trump was caught pressuring Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election by seeking investigations into Joe and Hunter Biden, he launched an unprecedented effort to stonewall Congress’ inquiry by denying documents and witnesses, Nadler charged.
“It puts even President Nixon to shame,” Nadler said.
Nadler's tough talk set the scene for the second of three days of the House managers' opening arguments against Trump, with a deep dive on the first article of impeachment, abuse of power.
On the first day of the opening arguments, Rep. Adam Schiff and his team used more than seven hours to make their case. That left 16 hours and 42 minutes on the opening statement clock between Thursday and Friday for the House Democrats. Then on Saturday, Trump's lawyers take the floor.
As the public case continued before the camera, another political campaign was underway behind the scenes over the issue of calling new witnesses. Democrats are seeking four GOP senators to join them in demanding new evidence in the trial, but Republicans are actively trying to avoid any GOP defections. No new witnesses would mean a speedy trial and a quicker vote to acquit the president.


welovetrump--2020-01-24--New CNN Poll Shows All Top 6 Democrats Beating Trump Nationwide

USA Today said the following on CNN 's latest prediction for 2020 : The CNN poll found every top Democratic @ @ @ @ @ a hypothetical matchup .
Here 's how those broke down : The Monmouth poll found @ @ @ @ @ happy with the current calendar for their party 's primaries and caucuses .
Fifty-eight percent @ @ @ @ @ national primary , while just 11 % favored keeping the current system .
The CNN @ @ @ @ @ with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points .
The margin @ @ @ @ @ and Democratic-leaning independents was 5.3 percentage points .

USA Today said the following on CNN's latest prediction for 2020:
The CNN poll found every top Democratic candidate would beat Trump in a hypothetical matchup. Here's how those broke down:
Biden 53%, Trump 44%
Sanders 52%, Trump 45%
Warren 50%, Trump 45%
Bloomberg 52%, Trump 43%
Buttigieg 49%, Trump 45%
Klobuchar 48%, Trump 45%
The Monmouth poll found that Democratic voters are not happy with the current calendar for their party's primaries and caucuses. Fifty-eight percent said they would prefer a national primary, while just 11% favored keeping the current system.
The CNN poll was conducted Jan. 16-19 with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points. The margin of error for Democratic voters and Democratic-leaning independents was 5.3 percentage points.


welovetrump--2020-01-24--Schiff “Jokes” About Imprisoning Senators After Almost 2-Dozen Walked Out During His Speech

Politico via Yahoo has more details on senators leaving during Schiff 's talking time : It was only day two , but the restlessness was palpable on the Senate floor on Wednesday as Democrats made their opening arguments against President Donald Trump .
Senators were expecting their first recess at 3:08 p.m. , roughly two hours after the trial got underway .
But House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff declared around 3:15 p.m. that he still had 10 minutes left , and several Republicans — including a half-dozen who had been waiting near the door — bolted to the exits .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ presentation , there were as many as two dozen Republican senators out of their seats at once — a clear violation of the rules that bar senators from leaving their seats during the trial .
“ The end is in sight , ” Schiff quipped on the floor , as senators began shuffling out of the chamber en masse .
Even before that scheduled recess break , a half dozen Republicans had decided to stand in the back — like Sens .
Tim Scott of South Carolina and Ben Sasse of Nebraska — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A half-dozen Democrats , too , were in and out of the chamber .
That includes Sen. Bernie Sanders ( I-Vt. ) , who left the room three times — including once for more than 10 minutes .
But nearly all Democrats remained in the chamber to listen to Schiff , even as some , like Sens .
Chris Murphy ( D-Conn. ) , Cory Booker ( D-N.J. ) , and Joe Manchin ( D-W.V . )
, stood near the back of the room to lean against a railing or wall .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ flagrant the rule violations on the floor .
There were several whispered conversations , with several senators going in and out of the chamber every minute or so .
The Senate eventually recessed around 3:30 p.m .

Politico via Yahoo has more details on senators leaving during Schiff's talking time:
4:30 P.M.
Empty seats in the trial
It was only day two, but the restlessness was palpable on the Senate floor on Wednesday as Democrats made their opening arguments against President Donald Trump.
Senators were expecting their first recess at 3:08 p.m., roughly two hours after the trial got underway. But House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff declared around 3:15 p.m. that he still had 10 minutes left, and several Republicans — including a half-dozen who had been waiting near the door — bolted to the exits.
As Schiff finished up his roughly three-hour presentation, there were as many as two dozen Republican senators out of their seats at once — a clear violation of the rules that bar senators from leaving their seats during the trial.
“The end is in sight,” Schiff quipped on the floor, as senators began shuffling out of the chamber en masse.
Even before that scheduled recess break, a half dozen Republicans had decided to stand in the back — like Sens. Tim Scott of South Carolina and Ben Sasse of Nebraska — rather than remain in their seats.
A half-dozen Democrats, too, were in and out of the chamber. That includes Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who left the room three times — including once for more than 10 minutes. But nearly all Democrats remained in the chamber to listen to Schiff, even as some, like Sens. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Joe Manchin (D-W.V.), stood near the back of the room to lean against a railing or wall.
The longer Schiff spoke, the more flagrant the rule violations on the floor. There were several whispered conversations, with several senators going in and out of the chamber every minute or so. The Senate eventually recessed around 3:30 p.m.


welovetrump--2020-01-24--Mayor Pete Has His Jeb Bush Moment As Crowd Fails To Clap For Him

It was my absolutely favorite moment of the 2016 campaign .
Do you remember it ?
It was wooden and @ @ @ @ @ “ rally ” .
When good old Jeb delivered a line that was supposed to @ @ @ @ @ happened .
Honestly , I wasn ’ t sure if I was watching the real @ @ @ @ @ impersonation on SNL because that ’ s what it felt like .
If you don @ @ @ @ @ want to laugh again ( like I did ) , here you go :

“Please clap”.
It was my absolutely favorite moment of the 2016 campaign.
Do you remember it?
It was wooden and low-energy Jeb Bush at a “rally”.
When good old Jeb delivered a line that was supposed to result in applause, nothing happened.
So Jeb uttered those famous words: “Please clap…”
Honestly, I wasn’t sure if I was watching the real Jeb or a Will Ferrell impersonation on SNL because that’s what it felt like.
If you don’t remember or just want to laugh again (like I did), here you go:


welovetrump--2020-01-24--Rudy Giuliani Says On Friday He Will Start “Cracking through the…cover-up of TOP level Democrats sel

Rudy Giuliani Says On Friday He Will Start “Cracking through the…cover-up of TOP level Democrats selling their public office”!


welovetrump--2020-01-24--Rand Paul Says 45 GOP Senators Are Already Ready To Dismiss Impeachment

Sen. Rand Paul ( R-KY ) said on Wednesday that 45 GOP senators are prepared to dismiss the charges against President Trump and effectively end the Senate impeachment trial .
The Kentucky senator told the Washington Post on day two of the Senate impeachment trial that 45 Republicans are ready to dismiss the charges against Trump .
( Republicans hold a 53-47 majority in the upper chamber . )
He estimated that “ five to eight ” want to “ hear a little more.
” “ There are 45 , with about five to eight wanting to hear a little @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ I still would like to dismiss it , but there aren ’ t the votes to do it just yet.
” However , Paul said he is not pushing the point just yet .
“ I will push it at some point , ” he told the paper , adding , “ The more Adam Schiff speaks , the more we become unified.
” Paul has openly rejected the Democrats ’ calls for additional witnesses and has issued a political threat to his GOP colleagues , in the event they side @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against Hunter Biden , you ’ re voting to lose your election , basically .
Seriously .
That ’ s what it is , ” Paul said , according to Politico .
He continued : If you don ’ t want to vote and you think you ’ re going to have to vote against Hunter Biden , you should just vote against witnesses , period .
My first preference would be to be done with it as soon as possible and not to have any witnesses .

Breitbartadded more details:
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said on Wednesday that 45 GOP senators are prepared to dismiss the charges against President Trump and effectively end the Senate impeachment trial.
The Kentucky senator told the Washington Post on day two of the Senate impeachment trial that 45 Republicans are ready to dismiss the charges against Trump. (Republicans hold a 53-47 majority in the upper chamber.) He estimated that “five to eight” want to “hear a little more.”
“There are 45, with about five to eight wanting to hear a little more,” Paul told the Post. “I still would like to dismiss it, but there aren’t the votes to do it just yet.”
However, Paul said he is not pushing the point just yet.
“I will push it at some point,” he told the paper, adding, “The more Adam Schiff speaks, the more we become unified.”
Paul has openly rejected the Democrats’ calls for additional witnesses and has issued a political threat to his GOP colleagues, in the event they side with Democrats.
“If you vote against Hunter Biden, you’re voting to lose your election, basically. Seriously. That’s what it is,” Paul said, according to Politico. He continued:


welovetrump--2020-01-24--HISTORIC: President Trump Will Be The First President To Speak At The March For Life!

President Trump announced Wednesday that he plans to attend the March for Life this week , which would make him the first president in history to speak at the largest annual gathering of pro-life activists .
`` See you on Friday ... Big Crowd ! ''
Trump tweeted .
The event is scheduled for Friday in Washington .
Organizers confirmed the president 's attendance .
“ We are deeply honored to welcome President Trump to the 47th annual March for Life , '' March for Life president Jeanne Mancini said in a statement provided to Fox News .
`` He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to attend and we are so excited for him to experience in person how passionate our marchers are about life and protecting the unborn . ''
The march is expected to draw 100,000 activists to the nation 's capital as Republicans like Trump pursue an ambitious pro-life agenda .
While pro-life activists have heaped praise on the president for his pro-life policies , his actions have sparked lawsuits and condemnation from groups like Planned Parenthood .
`` From the appointment of pro-life judges and federal workers , to cutting taxpayer funding for abortions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an end to late-term abortions , President Trump and his Administration have been consistent champions for life and their support for the March for Life has been unwavering .
We are grateful for all these pro-life accomplishments and look forward to gaining more victories for life in the future , '' Mancini wrote .
Trump 's announcement came after another unprecedented move .
During a video message in 2018 , Trump became the first sitting American president to address the March for Life .
Planned Parenthood responded critically .
`` Further confirmation that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is determined to end the American people 's ability to access abortion , '' Acting President and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson tweeted .
The March for Life 's timing is significant as it takes place around the anniversary of Roe v. Wade -- the landmark Supreme Court decision that prohibited states from banning the procedure at certain points during pregnancy .
On the actual anniversary of the decision , President Trump appeared to flout that legacy by declaring it the National Sanctity of Human Life Day .
`` Today , I call on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and defending the dignity of every human life , including those not yet born , '' Trump said in a proclamation Wednesday .
`` I call on the American people to continue to care for women in unexpected pregnancies and to support adoption and foster care in a more meaningful way , so every child can have a loving home . ''
His speech will take place as both sides of the abortion debate prepared to pour vast sums of money and resources into the 2020 elections .
Last week , Planned Parenthood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to date , warning about an unprecedented attack from Republicans .
The operation will include everything from grassroots organizing and building its volunteer base to polling and paid advertisements .
Several pro-life organizations will be spending millions of dollars -- $ 52 million from Susan B. Anthony List -- on the election as well .
The unprecedented spending likely came in response to a wave of state-level laws restricting abortion in addition to what pro-choice advocates say is a serious , federal assault on the organization .
Pro-life activists have claimed they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restrictions like the heartbeat bill , which would prohibit abortions after a doctor can detect a heartbeat .
Planned Parenthood responded to pro-life measures with a long list of legal challenges -- approximately 40 open cases , according to its most recent annual report -- and was able to salvage Missouri 's last abortion clinic amid restrictive legislation .

Even CNN covered the historic event:
President Donald Trump will attend Friday's March for Life, an annual anti-abortion event in Washington, he announced on Twitter.
"See you on Friday...Big Crowd!" Trump tweeted Wednesday, sharing a video from last year's march.
Trump will be the first president to attend the march, according to Jeanne Mancini, president of March for Life. Trump was also the first president to speak at the march via video feed when he addressed participants in the 2018 march.
The administration has consistently worked to regulate or restrict abortion access since Trump assumed office. His expected attendance at the march comes on the heels of his return from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and as the Senate impeachment trial into his conduct regarding Ukraine is underway.
Mancini said in a statement Wednesday that March for Life is "deeply honored" to welcome Trump to the group's 47th annual march.
"He will be the first president in history to attend and we are so excited for him to experience in person how passionate our marchers are about life and protecting the unborn," she said. A press release for the march says Trump will speak at the event.
Mancini called Trump and his administration "consistent champions for life," adding that "their support for the March for Life has been unwavering."
During his tenure, Trump has appointed anti-abortion judges and opposed abortions later in pregnancy, and his administration has taken efforts to further separate federal funds from abortion services.
The Friday event -- themed "Life Empowers: Pro-Life is Pro-Woman" -- will kick off with a rally on the National Mall followed by a march that concludes at the steps of the Supreme Court. House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, and GOP Rep. Chris Smith of New Jersey also are slated to speak at the march.
Marjorie Dannenfelser, the president of the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List, said the President's "presence at the March for Life, the world's largest pro-life event, signals a watershed moment for the Pro-life Movement." Dannenfelser previously served as the national chairwoman of the 2016 Trump campaign's Pro-life Coalition.
Abortion rights activists slammed Trump's announcement as a ploy to appeal to a minority of supporters on the issue.
NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue called Trump's move "an act of desperation, plain and simple," accusing him of "turning to deception and disinformation about abortion to gin up a vocal and extreme minority as he faces the escalating reality that his presidency is crumbling around him."