welovetrump--2020-12-18--Is It Time To Declare The Insurrection Act and Martial Law?  Here’s What That Means…

Ok folks , this is a very special article .
A few days ago I ran a poll asking if you think President Trump should declare the Insurrection Act and implement Martial Law to save the election and the country .
I bet you may have heard those terms before .
But do you know what they mean ?
I ’ m about to tell you .
But first , here was the poll : NATIONAL POLL : Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now ?
Thousands of you voted and here are the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than that , I received HUNDREDS of emails asking “ what is the Insurrection Act ?
” And what Martial Law really means .
There is a ton of confusion out there about those topics and since I can ’ t reply to every email when there are literally hundreds , I wrote this article .
I was researching and trying to find the best way to explain it to you and then I came across this solid gold .
This is a thread from Q that explains exactly what all of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only way out .
It ’ s so good you ’ re probably going to want to bookmark this article and show your family and friends .
The formatting is a little hard to follow but trust me , just tread through it in order and it will ALL make sense .
14\ The Trump legal team , along with Sidney Powell and the white hats all know that these legal issues will end up in front of SCOTUS .
They are using this time now in the lower courts to build their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much of it as they can ) far and wide .
22\ So what does this mean for we Patriots right now ?
Do we sit back and do nothing ?
No .
We stand and we fight !
We continue protesting and shouting and calling our reps to support each other .
We share the truth of the evidence far and wide .
We push back against the MSM narrative .
You can read the full thread here .
And if you ’ re more of a visual learner , you can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all down here : Before you go , please vote in my poll now that you know what it means !
NATIONAL POLL : Should Nancy Pelosi Be Removed From Office ?
NATIONAL POLL : Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
9,485 views
Ok folks, this is a very special article.
A few days ago I ran a poll asking if you think President Trump should declare the Insurrection Act and implement Martial Law to save the election and the country.
I bet you may have heard those terms before.
But do you know what they mean?
I’m about to tell you.
But first, here was the poll:
NATIONAL POLL: Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now?
Thousands of you voted and here are the results (wow!):
But more than that, I received HUNDREDS of emails asking “what is the Insurrection Act?”
And what Martial Law really means.
There is a ton of confusion out there about those topics and since I can’t reply to every email when there are literally hundreds, I wrote this article.
I was researching and trying to find the best way to explain it to you and then I came across this solid gold.
This is a thread from Q that explains exactly what all of this means and why this is the only way out.
It’s so good you’re probably going to want to bookmark this article and show your family and friends.
The formatting is a little hard to follow but trust me, just tread through it in order and it will ALL make sense.
Enjoy:
1\ As we’ve been watching the hearings on election fraud in these contested states, I keep thinking about the phrase “The military is the only way.” There are several related drops, but D36 stands out to me. Everything is so corrupt, there is no other way than the military.
2\ If the military is the only way, tho, why bother with lawsuits and fights with the MSM? Why not just invoke the Insurrection Act and take down these traitors? Because the people won’t accept it. They must first see it for themselves.
3\ Before Nov 3rd, most people still believed the elections were mostly fair and honest. Minor attempts at fraud existed, sure, but nothing like widespread national vote rigging. That fairytale has since been thoroughly and completely shattered these last several weeks.
4\ This mass blackpilling of people concerning our elections reminds me of another drop we saw a lot of during the riots and violence just a couple short months ago: D4461. Did you think “you must show them” was only about the riots?
5\ We all had to be shown just how thoroughly corrupt our elections had become and just how deep that corruption had spread. We all know there is corruption in D.C., but we also had to see the corruption at the state and local levels too. Even Republicans were in on it.
6\ Evidence was collected and lawsuits were filed, only for us to run into yet another level of corruption: the courts. Anons already know the level of corruption in these courts with activist judges running cover for the [DS]. But most others still needed to see it.
7\ We’ve seen flagrantly asinine rulings from these judges, and obviously biased refusals to even consider the evidence in some cases. Here and there a normal judge appears, but they are almost always overruled by corrupted higher courts.
8\ All along this time, we’ve also been witnessing yet another level of corruption in the mainstream media (MSM). The full on suppression and refusal to cover any of these lawsuits fairly and accurately to keep the info from the people is criminal. Even Fox News has thrown in.
9\ And joining their more traditional MSM brethren, are the Big Tech tyrants, who happily label anything speaking honestly and factually as ‘disputed’. They’re also quite happy in outright suspending or banning accounts that get a little too close to the truth.
10\ In an effort to combat these corrupt and fraudulent acts, we reach out to our corrupted DOJ and FBI for assistance in restraining these bad actors, and are responded to with silence. It’s as if these agencies are also in on the fraud and do not want to get involved.
11\ Every step of the way, we are met with fierce opposition and resistance. Integrity has no bearing and truth does not matter. We are like Sisyphus, forever pushing the same infinitely heavy boulder up the same insurmountable hill.
12\ We hold hearings with republican reps and senators from state legislatures presenting the evidence we’ve collected of widespread fraud. Afterward, they’re fully engaged, but there’s only so many of them and the remaining legislature doesn’t want the fight.
13\ Unfortunately, the state legislatures will most likely fail at their attempts to reclaim the electoral power. But this is known and expected. Why pursue it then, along with these hearings? Because WTP and these legislatures need to know the truth being kept from them.
14\ The Trump legal team, along with Sidney Powell and the white hats all know that these legal issues will end up in front of SCOTUS. They are using this time now in the lower courts to build their cases and spread the information (as much of it as they can) far and wide.
15\ The MAGA legal team needs to have the people and the state legislatures on board when the real hammer drops after SCOTUS rules in favor of Trump. Do you think Soros, et al. and the [DS] will simply accept a SCOTUS ruling that awards Trump his rightfully earned second term?
16\ The [DS] and the Soros bunch, along with the MSM, will cry bloody murder when the SCOTUS ruling drops. They will not accept it. They will blame ACB and refuse to concede. The riots will start again. The fires, the looting, the violence. The WH will be surrounded.
17\ The [DS] will have their ghoulish black bloc brigades thoroughly convinced the election was stolen by Trump and that they need to remove him by force. Tensions will rise until the hoards overrun the WH grounds and attempt to remove the POTUS, who will be absent.
18\ It is around this time we will get the message via Twitter: “My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us.” and the Insurrection Act will be finally invoked. The military and federalized NG will restore order to the streets, and will conduct all investigations into the fraud.
19\ What evidence do you think they’ll use to conduct these investigations? Possibly all the evidence being collected now and being displayed for all to see in these hearings? Would they add more of their own evidence? Treason will be declared and perp walks will begin.
20\ If you don’t think POTUS has these authorities under the Insurrection Act, I’d refer you to D11, where the authority is directly implied.
21\ So we’re just waiting on the SCOTUS rulings and the invocation of the Insurrection Act. That’s what all this is leading up to. POTUS and white hats had to show the people the truth and that all options to correct the fraud had been expended before invoking the Act, however.
22\ So what does this mean for we Patriots right now? Do we sit back and do nothing? No. We stand and we fight! We continue protesting and shouting and calling our reps to support each other. We share the truth of the evidence far and wide. We push back against the MSM narrative.
23\ We must let our supportive reps know that we stand with them, and we must let other Patriots know they are not alone. Do not hang your head when the “losses” come for we knew they would. They must to prove the necessity of the actions to be taken later.
24\ Stand tall, Patriot, knowing your voice will be heard. Stand tall, Patriot, knowing the truth will be shown. Stand tall, Patriot, knowing the corruption is nearing its end. This is not another 4-year election. No war. No civil unrest. Clean and swift. God wins.
You can read the full thread here.
And if you’re more of a visual learner, you can listen to my friend Daniel break it all down here:
Before you go, please vote in my poll now that you know what it means!
Vote here….👇
NATIONAL POLL: Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now?
Cheers!


welovetrump--2020-12-18--Trump’s Martial Law: A New Hope For America; Barr’s Special Mission From Trump To Expose The DOJ

I just came across this video and thought it was incredible !
I ’ ve never heard of this man or his show before , but I ’ ll tell you it ’ s better than most of the propaganda I see on Fox News these days !
This is real , honest reporting and I think you ’ re gon na love it .
It ’ s only about 15 minutes long and worth every minute .
Listen as he breaks down what Martial Law means and how it would save our country .
Then he switches to Bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a plan to expose the DOJ and save America ?
I know some of you still think so .
Does Bill Barr and Trump have a secret agreement ?
Why did Barr suddenly gain praise from Trump , Pompeo , and Cruz ?
In this episode , we look at why Bill Barr resigned and what it means for the future of contesting the election .
We know that Trump will not just rely on the lawsuit , but has other plans .
As the electoral voting approaches the end , more than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has slowly turned away from him .
But he has a plan , the special 2018 order and the will of the people .
In today ’ s episode , we break down Bill Barr ’ s resignation as well as the Electoral voting .
And a backup in case that gets deleted by YouScared .
So , what do you think ?
NATIONAL POLL : Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now ?
Here ’ s more on how this all might go down : 14\ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sidney Powell and the white hats all know that these legal issues will end up in front of SCOTUS .
They are using this time now in the lower courts to build their cases and spread the information ( as much of it as they can ) far and wide .
22\ So what does this mean for we Patriots right now ?
Do we sit back and do nothing ?
No .
We stand and we fight !
We continue protesting and shouting and calling our reps to support each other .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ far and wide .
We push back against the MSM narrative .
You can read the full thread here .
And if you ’ re more of a visual learner , you can listen to my friend Daniel break it all down here : Before you go , please vote in my poll now that you know what it means !
NATIONAL POLL : Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now ?
NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Have Trump 's Back 100 % ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
33,699 views
I just came across this video and thought it was incredible!
I’ve never heard of this man or his show before, but I’ll tell you it’s better than most of the propaganda I see on Fox News these days!
This is real, honest reporting and I think you’re gonna love it.
It’s only about 15 minutes long and worth every minute.
Listen as he breaks down what Martial Law means and how it would save our country.
Then he switches to Bill Barr.
Is Bill Barr still working a plan to expose the DOJ and save America?
I know some of you still think so.
And guess what?
Zhang agrees:
Does Bill Barr and Trump have a secret agreement? Why did Barr suddenly gain praise from Trump, Pompeo, and Cruz? In this episode, we look at why Bill Barr resigned and what it means for the future of contesting the election. We know that Trump will not just rely on the lawsuit, but has other plans. As the electoral voting approaches the end, more than one former “allies” of Trump has slowly turned away from him. But he has a plan, the special 2018 order and the will of the people. In today’s episode, we break down Bill Barr’s resignation as well as the Electoral voting.
Watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sKS81GWGIs&t=301s
And a backup in case that gets deleted by YouScared.
From Rumble:
So, what do you think?
NATIONAL POLL: Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now?
Here’s more on how this all might go down:
Enjoy:
1\ As we’ve been watching the hearings on election fraud in these contested states, I keep thinking about the phrase “The military is the only way.” There are several related drops, but D36 stands out to me. Everything is so corrupt, there is no other way than the military.
2\ If the military is the only way, tho, why bother with lawsuits and fights with the MSM? Why not just invoke the Insurrection Act and take down these traitors? Because the people won’t accept it. They must first see it for themselves.
3\ Before Nov 3rd, most people still believed the elections were mostly fair and honest. Minor attempts at fraud existed, sure, but nothing like widespread national vote rigging. That fairytale has since been thoroughly and completely shattered these last several weeks.
4\ This mass blackpilling of people concerning our elections reminds me of another drop we saw a lot of during the riots and violence just a couple short months ago: D4461. Did you think “you must show them” was only about the riots?
5\ We all had to be shown just how thoroughly corrupt our elections had become and just how deep that corruption had spread. We all know there is corruption in D.C., but we also had to see the corruption at the state and local levels too. Even Republicans were in on it.
6\ Evidence was collected and lawsuits were filed, only for us to run into yet another level of corruption: the courts. Anons already know the level of corruption in these courts with activist judges running cover for the [DS]. But most others still needed to see it.
7\ We’ve seen flagrantly asinine rulings from these judges, and obviously biased refusals to even consider the evidence in some cases. Here and there a normal judge appears, but they are almost always overruled by corrupted higher courts.
8\ All along this time, we’ve also been witnessing yet another level of corruption in the mainstream media (MSM). The full on suppression and refusal to cover any of these lawsuits fairly and accurately to keep the info from the people is criminal. Even Fox News has thrown in.
9\ And joining their more traditional MSM brethren, are the Big Tech tyrants, who happily label anything speaking honestly and factually as ‘disputed’. They’re also quite happy in outright suspending or banning accounts that get a little too close to the truth.
10\ In an effort to combat these corrupt and fraudulent acts, we reach out to our corrupted DOJ and FBI for assistance in restraining these bad actors, and are responded to with silence. It’s as if these agencies are also in on the fraud and do not want to get involved.
11\ Every step of the way, we are met with fierce opposition and resistance. Integrity has no bearing and truth does not matter. We are like Sisyphus, forever pushing the same infinitely heavy boulder up the same insurmountable hill.
12\ We hold hearings with republican reps and senators from state legislatures presenting the evidence we’ve collected of widespread fraud. Afterward, they’re fully engaged, but there’s only so many of them and the remaining legislature doesn’t want the fight.
13\ Unfortunately, the state legislatures will most likely fail at their attempts to reclaim the electoral power. But this is known and expected. Why pursue it then, along with these hearings? Because WTP and these legislatures need to know the truth being kept from them.
14\ The Trump legal team, along with Sidney Powell and the white hats all know that these legal issues will end up in front of SCOTUS. They are using this time now in the lower courts to build their cases and spread the information (as much of it as they can) far and wide.
15\ The MAGA legal team needs to have the people and the state legislatures on board when the real hammer drops after SCOTUS rules in favor of Trump. Do you think Soros, et al. and the [DS] will simply accept a SCOTUS ruling that awards Trump his rightfully earned second term?
16\ The [DS] and the Soros bunch, along with the MSM, will cry bloody murder when the SCOTUS ruling drops. They will not accept it. They will blame ACB and refuse to concede. The riots will start again. The fires, the looting, the violence. The WH will be surrounded.
17\ The [DS] will have their ghoulish black bloc brigades thoroughly convinced the election was stolen by Trump and that they need to remove him by force. Tensions will rise until the hoards overrun the WH grounds and attempt to remove the POTUS, who will be absent.
18\ It is around this time we will get the message via Twitter: “My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us.” and the Insurrection Act will be finally invoked. The military and federalized NG will restore order to the streets, and will conduct all investigations into the fraud.
19\ What evidence do you think they’ll use to conduct these investigations? Possibly all the evidence being collected now and being displayed for all to see in these hearings? Would they add more of their own evidence? Treason will be declared and perp walks will begin.
20\ If you don’t think POTUS has these authorities under the Insurrection Act, I’d refer you to D11, where the authority is directly implied.
21\ So we’re just waiting on the SCOTUS rulings and the invocation of the Insurrection Act. That’s what all this is leading up to. POTUS and white hats had to show the people the truth and that all options to correct the fraud had been expended before invoking the Act, however.
22\ So what does this mean for we Patriots right now? Do we sit back and do nothing? No. We stand and we fight! We continue protesting and shouting and calling our reps to support each other. We share the truth of the evidence far and wide. We push back against the MSM narrative.
23\ We must let our supportive reps know that we stand with them, and we must let other Patriots know they are not alone. Do not hang your head when the “losses” come for we knew they would. They must to prove the necessity of the actions to be taken later.
24\ Stand tall, Patriot, knowing your voice will be heard. Stand tall, Patriot, knowing the truth will be shown. Stand tall, Patriot, knowing the corruption is nearing its end. This is not another 4-year election. No war. No civil unrest. Clean and swift. God wins.
You can read the full thread here.
And if you’re more of a visual learner, you can listen to my friend Daniel break it all down here:
Before you go, please vote in my poll now that you know what it means!
Vote here….👇
NATIONAL POLL: Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now?
Cheers!
Watch:


welovetrump--2020-12-18--Rep. Mo Brooks’ Plan Has Libs Scared: “It would be likely Mr Trump would receive a second term in th

Rep. Mo Brooks’ Plan Has Libs Scared: “It would be likely Mr Trump would receive a second term in that scenario.”

I ’ ve been telling you the route to a Trump victory may very well go through Congress using the 12th Amendment and NOT the Supreme Court .
I first reported on this four weeks ago .
Now Rep. Mo Brooks and Rand Paul appear to be getting on board .
The plan started with the Alternative Electors and then goes straight to Mike Pence !
Rep. Mo brooks is moving ahead with his plan to challenge the 2020 presidential election when Congress meets to certify the votes of the Electoral College on January 6th .
Brooks said he will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Electoral College and American voters voted in favor of President-Elect Joe Biden .
“ For Congressman Brooks it ’ s a politically advantageous move .
But the likelihood that it will alter the outcome of the Presidential Election is in my view very very very slight , ” said News 19 political analyst Jess Brown .
Brooks said he wants certain State ’ s electoral votes cast aside , based on the president ’ s allegations of mass voter fraud .
So far no evidence of any fraud at all has materialized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fraud at the state and Supreme Court levels have failed .
The Congressman still needs the support of a Senator to trigger a debate before Congress .
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell poured cold water on the idea this week and urged his Senate colleagues not to join the effort .
Local political analysts have different views on whether or not it is a shot Brooks should take .
“ This is what ’ s disturbing about these efforts , by Mo and others .
They don ’ t seem to have the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ address arguably the largest health crisis of the past 50 , 60 years , but they have all of the energy and all of the focus in the world to focus on an election that was lost , ” said political analyst and radio host David Person .
“ Not only does Congressman Brooks have a right to do it .
He has a duty to do it if he feels there is a problem with the election , then he should raise objections to it .
And I know there will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House of Representatives that will probably go along with Congressman Brooks on this , ” said political analyst and attorney Mark McDaniel .
You can watch Brooks talk about it here : Here ’ s more on the plan , from The Independent : Conservatives have been arguing for weeks that there was widespread election fraud in Arizona , Pennsylvania , Nevada , Georgia , and Wisconsin , although the paucity of evidence they have presented so far has led to a string of humiliations in the state and federal court systems .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ vote is Alabama Congressman Mo Brooks , who has been prowling around the US Capitol in recent weeks trying to drum up support for the scheme among conservative House members and senators .
He needs just one senator to support his and other House Republicans ’ challenge to the electoral results to force a two-hour debate period and then a vote series on scrapping a state ’ s Electoral College submission .
So far , the New York Times reported when it first broke the news of this scheme , no senator has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ GOP Senators Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky have shown some interest .
If Congress were to scrap the electoral results in the five states in question , neither Mr Trump nor Democratic President-elect Joe Biden would have the necessary 270 votes to claim the presidency .
The House of Representatives would then vote for president by state congressional delegation .
Republicans will control more state delegations than Democrats in the next Congress even though Democrats will have a slight overall majority in the chamber .
It would be likely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in that scenario .
Mr Brooks , a member of the hardline conservative House Freedom Caucus that has included the likes of Congressman Jim Jordan and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows , told the Times his primary aim is “ [ fixing ] a badly flawed American election system that too easily permits voter fraud and election theft.
” He added : “ A possible bonus from achieving that goal is that Donald Trump would win the Electoral College officially , as I believe he in fact did if you only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and exclude all illegal votes.
” But while Mr Brooks may be able to cajole a senator into forcing a vote on the Electoral College ’ s integrity , his master plan is doomed to ultimately fall short .
Mr Biden will become the 46th US president .
The motion to toss into the fire the Electoral College vote in the five states is certain to fail since majorities in both the Democratic-controlled House and Republican-held Senate are needed to pass it .
Democrats and even several Republicans in both chambers have roundly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the election results .
Actually overturning the will of the Electoral College — whose composition is determined by the American people ’ s vote on 3 November — would represent an even more momentous step away from democracy .
“ Madness , ” Utah GOP Senator Mitt Romney told reporters last Tuesday .
“ This is madness .
We have a process .
Recounts are appropriate .
Going to the court is appropriate .
Pursuing every legal avenue is appropriate .
But trying to get electors not to do what the people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mr Brooks and a GOP senator force such a vote in Congress , it would present Republicans with a final , crucial litmus test on their loyalty to an outgoing president whose cult of personality has subsumed their party ’ s identity over the last four years .
It would also put Republicans on the permanent record about Mr Trump ’ s allegations of election fraud that they have been abetting over the last several weeks .
Longtime GOP back-benchers like Mr Brooks — who has never chaired a congressional committee in his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does not contribute to the party as a prolific fundraiser , and placed a distant third in a 2017 run for Senate in Alabama — are relishing the opportunity to promote Mr Trump in such a high-profile fashion .
The failing NY Times wrote a hit piece about the plan , which only tells me it must be meritorious and have them scared : President Trump lost key swing states by clear margins .
His barrage of lawsuits claiming widespread voting fraud has been almost universally dismissed , most recently by the Supreme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Electoral College will formally cast a majority of its votes for President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr .
But as the president continues to refuse to concede , a small group of his most loyal backers in Congress is plotting a final-stage challenge on the floor of the House of Representatives in early January to try to reverse Mr. Biden ’ s victory .
Constitutional scholars and even members of the president ’ s own party say the effort is all but certain to fail .
But the looming battle on Jan. 6 is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deeply divisive spectacle that could thrust Vice President Mike Pence into the excruciating position of having to declare once and for all that Mr. Trump has indeed lost the election .
The fight promises to shape how Mr. Trump ’ s base views the election for years to come , and to pose yet another awkward test of allegiance for Republicans who have privately hoped that the Electoral College vote this week will be the final word on the election result .
For the vice president , whom the Constitution assigns the task @ @ @ @ @ @ @ winner , the episode could be particularly torturous , forcing him to balance his loyalty to Mr. Trump with his constitutional duties and considerations about his own political future .
The effort is being led by Representative Mo Brooks , Republican of Alabama , a backbench conservative .
Along with a group of allies in the House , he is eyeing challenges to the election results in five different states — Arizona , Pennsylvania , Nevada , Georgia and Wisconsin — where they claim varying degrees of fraud or illegal voting took place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and no evidence of widespread impropriety .
“ We have a superior role under the Constitution than the Supreme Court does , than any federal court judge does , than any state court judge does , ” Mr. Brooks said in an interview .
“ What we say , goes .
That ’ s the final verdict.
” Under rules laid out in the Constitution and the Electoral Count Act of 1887 , their challenges must be submitted in writing with a senator ’ s signature also affixed .
No Republican senator has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she will back such an effort , though a handful of reliable allies of Mr. Trump , including Senators Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky , have signaled they would be open to doing so .
The president has praised Mr. Brooks on Twitter , but has thus far taken no evident interest in the strategy .
Aides say he has been more focused on battling to overturn the results in court .
Even if a senator did agree , constitutional scholars say the process is intended to be an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heard from a member of each house of Congress , senators and representatives will retreat to their chambers on opposite sides of the Capitol for a two-hour debate and then a vote on whether to disqualify a state ’ s votes .
Both the Democratic-controlled House and Republican-controlled Senate would have to agree to toss out a state ’ s electoral votes — something that has not happened since the 19th century .
Several Senate Republicans — including Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania , Susan Collins of Maine , Lisa Murkowski of Alaska @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forcefully rejected the idea of overturning the results , and their votes would be enough for Mr. Biden to prevail with the support of Democrats .
“ The Jan. 6 meeting is going to confirm that regardless of how many objections get filed and who signs on , they are not going to affect the outcome of the process , ” said Edward B. Foley , a constitutional law professor at Ohio State University who has written extensively on the electoral process .
“ We can say that with clear confidence.
” But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carry consequences for the next few years .
If even one Republican senator backed the effort , it could ensure that the partisan cloud hanging over the election would darken Mr. Biden ’ s presidency for years to come .
If none did , it could send a definitive message to the country that despite Mr. Trump ’ s bluster , the party trusted the results of the electoral process and was finally ready to recognize Mr. Biden as the rightful winner .
Mr. Brooks is far from the first lawmaker to try @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the results of a bitter election loss .
House Democrats made attempts in 2001 , 2005 and even 2017 , but they were essentially acts of protest after their party ’ s nominee had already accepted defeat .
What is different now is Mr. Trump ’ s historic defiance of democratic norms and his party ’ s willing acquiescence .
If Mr. Trump were to bless the effort to challenge the congressional tally , he could force Republicans into a difficult decision about whether to support an assault on the election results that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Many Republicans are already fearful of being punished by voters for failing to keep up his fight .
The dilemma is particularly acute for Mr. Pence , who is eyeing his own presidential run in 2024 .
As president of the Senate , he has the constitutionally designated task of opening and tallying envelopes sent from all 50 states and announcing their electoral results .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
33,333 views
I’ve been telling you the route to a Trump victory may very well go through Congress using the 12th Amendment and NOT the Supreme Court.
I first reported on this four weeks ago.
Now Rep. Mo Brooks and Rand Paul appear to be getting on board.
The plan started with the Alternative Electors and then goes straight to Mike Pence!
IMHO, Joe Biden DID NOT win lawful vote majority in Georgia. Per its right & duty, Congress should reject any Georgia submission of 16 electoral college votes for Joe Biden. That is EXACTLY what I hope to help do. See below lawsuit for more! SORDID!https://t.co/B4wxjGZaaB — Mo Brooks (@RepMoBrooks) November 27, 2020
CBS News19 had more details:
Rep. Mo brooks is moving ahead with his plan to challenge the 2020 presidential election when Congress meets to certify the votes of the Electoral College on January 6th. Brooks said he will follow through with the threat even though the Electoral College and American voters voted in favor of President-Elect Joe Biden. “For Congressman Brooks it’s a politically advantageous move. But the likelihood that it will alter the outcome of the Presidential Election is in my view very very very slight,” said News 19 political analyst Jess Brown. Brooks said he wants certain State’s electoral votes cast aside, based on the president’s allegations of mass voter fraud. So far no evidence of any fraud at all has materialized, and dozens of court cases claiming fraud at the state and Supreme Court levels have failed. The Congressman still needs the support of a Senator to trigger a debate before Congress. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell poured cold water on the idea this week and urged his Senate colleagues not to join the effort. Local political analysts have different views on whether or not it is a shot Brooks should take. “This is what’s disturbing about these efforts, by Mo and others. They don’t seem to have the focus or the energy to try to address arguably the largest health crisis of the past 50, 60 years, but they have all of the energy and all of the focus in the world to focus on an election that was lost,” said political analyst and radio host David Person. “Not only does Congressman Brooks have a right to do it. He has a duty to do it if he feels there is a problem with the election, then he should raise objections to it. And I know there will be a number of other members of The House of Representatives that will probably go along with Congressman Brooks on this,” said political analyst and attorney Mark McDaniel.
You can watch Brooks talk about it here:
Here’s more on the plan, from The Independent:
Conservatives have been arguing for weeks that there was widespread election fraud in Arizona, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Georgia, and Wisconsin, although the paucity of evidence they have presented so far has led to a string of humiliations in the state and federal court systems. Leading the effort to overturn the electoral vote is Alabama Congressman Mo Brooks, who has been prowling around the US Capitol in recent weeks trying to drum up support for the scheme among conservative House members and senators. He needs just one senator to support his and other House Republicans’ challenge to the electoral results to force a two-hour debate period and then a vote series on scrapping a state’s Electoral College submission. So far, the New York Times reported when it first broke the news of this scheme, no senator has stepped up to the plate, although GOP Senators Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky have shown some interest. If Congress were to scrap the electoral results in the five states in question, neither Mr Trump nor Democratic President-elect Joe Biden would have the necessary 270 votes to claim the presidency. The House of Representatives would then vote for president by state congressional delegation. Republicans will control more state delegations than Democrats in the next Congress even though Democrats will have a slight overall majority in the chamber. It would be likely Mr Trump would receive a second term in that scenario. Mr Brooks, a member of the hardline conservative House Freedom Caucus that has included the likes of Congressman Jim Jordan and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, told the Times his primary aim is “[fixing] a badly flawed American election system that too easily permits voter fraud and election theft.” He added: “A possible bonus from achieving that goal is that Donald Trump would win the Electoral College officially, as I believe he in fact did if you only count lawful votes by eligible American citizens and exclude all illegal votes.” But while Mr Brooks may be able to cajole a senator into forcing a vote on the Electoral College’s integrity, his master plan is doomed to ultimately fall short. Mr Biden will become the 46th US president. The motion to toss into the fire the Electoral College vote in the five states is certain to fail since majorities in both the Democratic-controlled House and Republican-held Senate are needed to pass it. Democrats and even several Republicans in both chambers have roundly rejected the GOP’s legal challenges to the election results. Actually overturning the will of the Electoral College — whose composition is determined by the American people’s vote on 3 November — would represent an even more momentous step away from democracy. “Madness,” Utah GOP Senator Mitt Romney told reporters last Tuesday. “This is madness. We have a process. Recounts are appropriate. Going to the court is appropriate. Pursuing every legal avenue is appropriate. But trying to get electors not to do what the people voted to do is madness.” If Mr Brooks and a GOP senator force such a vote in Congress, it would present Republicans with a final, crucial litmus test on their loyalty to an outgoing president whose cult of personality has subsumed their party’s identity over the last four years. It would also put Republicans on the permanent record about Mr Trump’s allegations of election fraud that they have been abetting over the last several weeks. Longtime GOP back-benchers like Mr Brooks — who has never chaired a congressional committee in his nearly 10 years in the House, does not contribute to the party as a prolific fundraiser, and placed a distant third in a 2017 run for Senate in Alabama — are relishing the opportunity to promote Mr Trump in such a high-profile fashion.
The failing NY Times wrote a hit piece about the plan, which only tells me it must be meritorious and have them scared:


welovetrump--2020-12-18--Here’s What The “Alternative Electors” Means and How It Will Work

Have you heard a lot about President Trump ’ s “ alternative electors ” but don ’ t understand what it means ?
I have never in my life heard of this but it may just be the path to President Trump ’ s second term .
And merely judging by how much liberals are melting down over the idea tells me it actually has merit .
In case you missed this today , Newsmax just did an interview and explained what the Alternative Electors are , how they work , and how it may lead to a Trump win @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down , I have a backup saved .
Here ’ s more on the Alternative Electors : And this guy is awesome ( toot toot ! )
: The Hill had more : President Trump ’ s allies are preparing to send an “ alternate ” slate of electors to Congress , senior White House adviser Stephen Miller said Monday , signaling Trump will drag out his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election even after the Electoral College certifies Joe Biden as the winner .
Miller , appearing on Fox @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump campaign , brushed off the idea that the Electoral College vote marked any kind of end to the process .
“ The only date in the Constitution is Jan. 20 .
So we have more than enough time to right the wrong of this fraudulent election result and certify Donald Trump as the winner of the election , ” Miller said on “ Fox & Friends.
” “ As we speak , today , an alternate slate of electors in the contested states is going to vote and we ’ re going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” he continued .
“ This will ensure that all of our legal remedies remain open .
That means that if we win these cases in the courts , that we can direct that the alternate state of electors be certified.
” Electors from every state will meet on Monday to formally elect Biden as the next president .
Those results will be certified by the states and submitted to Congress .
Miller indicated that Trump supporters will act as “ alternates ” in a handful of contested states , including Georgia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their own , unofficial results .
Should the Trump campaign succeed in overturning the outcome in any of those states , Miller said , the alternate electors could then be recognized by Congress .
Nothing in the Constitution or state electoral processes allows for such an “ alternate ” slate of electors .
Miller also raised the idea of state legislatures stepping in to overturn the results or of Congress interceding .
Here ’ s even more about what happens next on January 6… .
Watch this and prepare to have your mind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken down , I have a backup on Rumble .
Here you go : Full Text of the 12th Amendment , from Law.Cornell.edu : The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President , one of whom , at least , shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves ; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President , and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President , and they shall make distinct lists of all persons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all persons voted for as Vice-President , and of the number of votes for each , which lists they shall sign and certify , and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States , directed to the President of the Senate ; –The President of the Senate shall , in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives , open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted ; –the person having the greatest number of votes for President , shall be the President , if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whole number of electors appointed ; and if no person have such majority , then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President , the House of Representatives shall choose immediately , by ballot , the President .
But in choosing the President , the votes shall be taken by states , the representation from each state having one vote ; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states , and a majority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a choice .
And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them , before the fourth day of March next following , then the Vice-President shall act as President , as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President .
The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President , shall be the Vice-President , if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed , and if no person have a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ numbers on the list , the Senate shall choose the Vice-President ; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators , and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice .
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States .
The Twelfth Amendment ( Amendment XII ) to the United States Constitution provides the procedure for electing the president and vice president .
It replaced the procedure provided in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3 , by which the Electoral College originally functioned .
The amendment was proposed by the Congress on December 9 , 1803 , and was ratified by the requisite three-fourths of state legislatures on June 15 , 1804 .
The new rules took effect for the 1804 presidential election and have governed all subsequent presidential elections .
Under the original rules of the Constitution , each member of the Electoral College cast two electoral votes , with no distinction made between electoral votes for president and electoral votes for vice president .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ votes—provided that number equaled a majority of the electors—was elected president , while the presidential candidate receiving the second-most votes was elected vice president .
In cases where no individual won a vote from a majority of the electors , as well as in cases where multiple individuals won votes from a majority of electors but tied each other for the most votes , the House of Representatives would hold a contingent election to select the president .
In cases where multiple candidates tied for the second-most votes , the Senate would hold @ @ @ @ @ @ @ president .
The first four presidential elections were conducted under these rules .
The experiences of the 1796 and 1800 presidential elections – showing that the original system caused the election of a President and Vice-President who were political opponents of each other , constantly acting at cross-purposes – spurred legislators to amend the presidential election process , requiring each member of the Electoral College to cast one electoral vote for president and one electoral vote for vice president .
Under the new rules , a contingent election is still held by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a presidential electoral vote from a majority of the electors , but there is no longer any possibility of multiple candidates winning presidential electoral votes from a majority of electors .
The Twelfth Amendment also lowered the number of candidates eligible to be selected by the House in a presidential contingent election from five to three , established that the Senate would hold a contingent election for vice president if no candidate won a majority of the vice presidential electoral vote , and provided that no individual constitutionally ineligible to the office of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vice president .
Remember , President Trump has said he WON and he hasn ’ t backed down : Does this look like a many ready to concede ?
Congress will open and record the votes of the Electoral College in Washington , DC , on January 6 , 2021 .
But this time when , as per the 12th amendment of the US Constitution , “ the President of the Senate shall , in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives , open all the certificates , ” the procedure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Because each house is controlled by a different party , each may approve their own list , or both houses may reject the electors from some states .
The legal framework is so vague that no one outcome can be certain .
In case of a tie , the 12th Amendment states that “ the House of Representatives shall choose immediately , by ballot , the President ” and that “ the votes shall be taken by states , the representation from each state having one vote ” .
As things stand , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rather that the individual votes of the 435 representatives would give the Republicans a majority to reelect their candidate .
But everything hinges on the elections in the House and Senate , also on November 3 , since the final decision would be up to the members of the new Congress , to be installed on January 3 , 2021 .
Incidentally , the current Speaker of the House , Nancy Pelosi , is an unparalleled strategist who has already mapped the districts the Democrats must win on November 3 in order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also a majority of blue states in the House of Representatives .
Here is even more on the history and working of the 12th Amendment , from the ConstitutionCenter.org : The Twelfth Amendment can not be understood outside of the Electoral College , which was set out in the 1787 Constitution as the mechanism by which Americans select their presidents .
There were four crucial aspects of that mechanism .
The first was that the electors would vote for two persons ( at least one of whom had to be from outside the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The second was that the electors did not differentiate between the two persons as potential presidents or vice presidents .
Electors should simply vote for the two persons they viewed as most qualified to become president .
The person gaining the most votes ( if a majority ) would become president .
The runner-up ( presumably the second-most-qualified person ) would become vice president .
The third assumption was that the electors—at least following the completely predictable ( and unanimous ) election of George Washington as our first president—would quite often fail to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; in that case , according to the original Constitution , the decision would be made by the House of Representatives , with each state ’ s delegation having one vote .
The Constitution also provided that the House would choose in case of a tie vote between two candidates each of whom had received a majority of votes .
Finally , because the Constitution , until amended in 1933 , provided that newly elected representatives would meet for the first time only a full year after election , the choice would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ include a number of “ lame-ducks , ” including representatives who had been defeated in the recent elections .
All of these features were on display in 1801 .
The election of 1800 was one of the most important in American history and , arguably , even in world history , for it represented the first time that an incumbent leader was defeated in an election .
The incumbent was John Adams , who had been Washington ’ s Vice President for two terms and was then elected in his own right in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jefferson .
This result reflects the desire of the Framers of 1787 to avoid development of political parties and focus indeed on some notion of “ best men.
” Any such hopes were quickly frustrated , however .
Even by 1796 , Adams was associated with the Federalist Party , while Jefferson was supported by the Democratic-Republican Party .
They ran against each other again in 1800 , and both Adams and Jefferson had “ running mates , ” Charles Cotesworth Pinckney from South Carolina in the case of Adams ( and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New York , for Jefferson .
The Federalist Party electors figured out that it was important not to cast both of their votes for Adams and Pinckney , for that would create a tie and , if both got a majority of the vote , throw the election into the House ; the Democratic-Republican electors were not so sagacious .
They dutifully cast both of their votes for their party ’ s champions , creating a tie majority vote that forced the House to choose between Jefferson and Burr .
The tie vote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The one-state/one-vote rule had the practical effect of giving Delaware ’ s sole Representative Bayard , an ardent Federalist , the same voting power as Virginia , then the largest state ( and home , of course , of Jefferson ) .
And what if a state had an even number of representatives who split evening on their choice ?
In that case , the state ’ s vote was not cast at all .
Given that there were 16 states in the Union in 1801 , nine delegations had to agree @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 36th ballot did Bayard agree to vote for Jefferson and to break the deadlock ( by which time at least two Jeffersonian governors , from Pennsylvania and Virginia , were threatening to call out their state militias and order them to march on the new national capitol in Washington , D.C. ) .
Jefferson was peacefully inaugurated on March 4 , and the all-important precedent was set for peaceful transfer of power .
Yet the original electoral college system was exposed as problematic , and there was widespread agreement that something had to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possibility , obviously , was to adopt the suggestion of Pennsylvania ’ s James Wilson at the Philadelphia Convention that presidents be elected by a national popular vote .
That was rejected in 1787 and did not become a serious possibility in the early 19th century ( nor , of course , has it been adopted since then ) .
Still , it had become clear that political parties had become a feature of American politics and that the electoral college system should be modified to reflect this .
How was this accomplished @ @ @ @ @ @ @ electors would in the future continue to cast two votes ( and one of them , as before , would have to be for a non-native of the elector ’ s home state ) , but , crucially , one of the two votes would explicitly be to fill the presidency , while the other designated who should become vice president .
Never again could presidential candidates and their running mates face the embarrassing kind of tie vote that forced the House to choose between Jefferson and Burr .
The Twelfth Amendment was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 9 , 1803 and submitted to the states three days later .
There being seventeen states in the Union at that time , thirteen had to ratify it .
Secretary of State James Madison declared that the Amendment had been added to the Constitution on September 25 , 1804 , at which time fourteen of the seventeen states had ratified it .
Delaware , Connecticut , and Massachusetts had rejected it ( though Massachusetts in fact ratified it in 1961 ! )
.
The election of 1804 and all subsequent elections were carried @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Amendment .
This splitting of the presidency and vice-presidency did not go uncontested .
At least two senators expressed their reservations about the quality of vice presidential candidates .
Rather than asking of a candidate “ Is he capable ?
Is he honest ?
” , Delaware ’ s Senator White suggested that the question instead would be “ Can he by his name , by his connections , by his wealth , by his local situation , by his influence , or his intrigues , best promote the election of a President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ Will the ambitious , aspiring candidate for the Presidency , will his friends and favorites promote the election of a man of talents , probity and popularity for Vice President , and who may prove his rival ?
No !
They will seek a man of moderate talents.
” One might well ask how often such fears have been realized in our history .
In addition to its implicit recognition of the existence of political parties , the Amendment made another important change : The original Constitution provided that the failure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would require the House to choose as president one of the five top-ranking candidates , with the person coming in second to serve as vice-president unless there was tie for second place , in which case the Senate would choose between them .
Now , however , the House would choose only the President from the top three choices of the electors ; the Senate would now choose the Vice President from the top two choices of the electors for that specific office .
Among other things , this guaranteed , in effect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vice president , who could presumably take the reins of the presidency should the House be hopelessly divided among the top three candidates for the presidency .
This aspect of the Twelfth Amendment became crucial in 1824 , the only time since 1800 that the House in fact selected the president as the result of the inability of any of the presidential candidates to achieve a majority of electoral votes .
Andrew Jackson had won 99 , John Quincy Adams 84 , William Crawford 41 , and Henry Clay 37 .
Under the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been able to choose among all four , and one might plausibly believe that Clay might have prevailed .
Under the Twelfth Amendment , however , Clay was out of the running , and the choice was reduced to Jackson , Adams , and Crawford .
Although no election since 1824 has been decided in the House of Representatives , a shift of relatively few votes in a small number of key states might well have led to that result in 1948 , 1968 , and 2000 .
What this means , practically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Wyoming , the smallest state with under 600,000 people , would have the same say in choosing a new president as California , with a population nearly 70 times that of Wyoming .
As much to the point , perhaps , it is quite easy to imagine the popular vote winner losing to the runner-up in part because gerrymandered delegations in the House of Representatives voted for their party ’ s favorite rather than the person who actually received a majority of their state ’ s popular vote .
Because of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the result of the electoral vote ( or potential vote in the House ) , there have been recurrent proposals simply to elect the president by popular vote .
If , though , one shares any of White ’ s or Tracy ’ s concerns about the vice presidency , popular election would not necessarily assuage them if one were forced to vote for the president and vice-president as a single ticket .
( Political scientists have determined that voters rarely cast their vote on the basis of the vice presidential candidate .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the practice in many states and “ unbundle ” the election of our two top executive branch officials .
That is , just as in many states candidates for governor and lieutenant governor run entirely separate campaigns , meaning that sometimes the governor is from one party and the lieutenant governor from another , one could imagine separate elections for the president and vice president .
Even within the electoral college , we could imagine voting for two slates of electors , one charged with choosing the president , the other picking the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , of course , voters would pick the slates of the same political party .
But one can imagine that at least on occasion voters might be so put off by the vice presidential candidate that they would “ split ” their ticket .
That very possibility might serve to discipline presidential candidates more than is now the case , especially because candidates who win the presidential nomination today basically exercise unlimited discretion in choosing their running mates .
This was not the case before the 20th century , when political conventions often @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

13,335 views
Have you heard a lot about President Trump’s “alternative electors” but don’t understand what it means?
You’re not alone.
I have never in my life heard of this but it may just be the path to President Trump’s second term.
And merely judging by how much liberals are melting down over the idea tells me it actually has merit.
In case you missed this today, Newsmax just did an interview and explained what the Alternative Electors are, how they work, and how it may lead to a Trump win.
Watch:
And in case YouScared takes that down, I have a backup saved.
From Rumble:
Here’s more on the Alternative Electors:
Stephen Miller on Fox & Friends says "an alternative" group of electors is also voting today: "As we speak, an alternate slate of electors in the contested states is going to vote and we are going to send those results to Congress."pic.twitter.com/5kIkfsbOFw — Travis Akers (@travisakers) December 14, 2020
And this guy is awesome (toot toot!):
The absolute meltdown in January is going to be insane pic.twitter.com/CVEwgj8LwI — Right Wing Cope (@RightWingCope) December 15, 2020
Stephen Miller: "Alternate" electors will keep Trump election challenge alive https://t.co/YbjaV1gRJ4 pic.twitter.com/C46JreN3MQ — The Hill (@thehill) December 15, 2020
The Hill had more:
President Trump’s allies are preparing to send an “alternate” slate of electors to Congress, senior White House adviser Stephen Miller said Monday, signaling Trump will drag out his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election even after the Electoral College certifies Joe Biden as the winner. Miller, appearing on Fox News as a senior adviser to the Trump campaign, brushed off the idea that the Electoral College vote marked any kind of end to the process. “The only date in the Constitution is Jan. 20. So we have more than enough time to right the wrong of this fraudulent election result and certify Donald Trump as the winner of the election,” Miller said on “Fox & Friends.” “As we speak, today, an alternate slate of electors in the contested states is going to vote and we’re going to send those results up to Congress,” he continued. “This will ensure that all of our legal remedies remain open. That means that if we win these cases in the courts, that we can direct that the alternate state of electors be certified.” Electors from every state will meet on Monday to formally elect Biden as the next president. Those results will be certified by the states and submitted to Congress. Miller indicated that Trump supporters will act as “alternates” in a handful of contested states, including Georgia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, to submit their own, unofficial results. Should the Trump campaign succeed in overturning the outcome in any of those states, Miller said, the alternate electors could then be recognized by Congress. Nothing in the Constitution or state electoral processes allows for such an “alternate” slate of electors. Miller also raised the idea of state legislatures stepping in to overturn the results or of Congress interceding.
Here’s even more about what happens next on January 6….
It’s called the 12th Amendment.
Watch this and prepare to have your mind blown:
And in case that gets taken down, I have a backup on Rumble.
Too important to miss.
Here you go:
Full Text of the 12th Amendment, from Law.Cornell.edu:
12th Amendment Amendment XII The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;–The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;–the person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
And from Wikipedia:
The Twelfth Amendment (Amendment XII) to the United States Constitution provides the procedure for electing the president and vice president. It replaced the procedure provided in Article II, Section 1, Clause 3, by which the Electoral College originally functioned. The amendment was proposed by the Congress on December 9, 1803, and was ratified by the requisite three-fourths of state legislatures on June 15, 1804. The new rules took effect for the 1804 presidential election and have governed all subsequent presidential elections. Under the original rules of the Constitution, each member of the Electoral College cast two electoral votes, with no distinction made between electoral votes for president and electoral votes for vice president. The presidential candidate receiving the greatest number of votes—provided that number equaled a majority of the electors—was elected president, while the presidential candidate receiving the second-most votes was elected vice president. In cases where no individual won a vote from a majority of the electors, as well as in cases where multiple individuals won votes from a majority of electors but tied each other for the most votes, the House of Representatives would hold a contingent election to select the president. In cases where multiple candidates tied for the second-most votes, the Senate would hold a contingent election to select the vice president. The first four presidential elections were conducted under these rules. The experiences of the 1796 and 1800 presidential elections – showing that the original system caused the election of a President and Vice-President who were political opponents of each other, constantly acting at cross-purposes – spurred legislators to amend the presidential election process, requiring each member of the Electoral College to cast one electoral vote for president and one electoral vote for vice president. Under the new rules, a contingent election is still held by the House of Representatives if no candidate wins a presidential electoral vote from a majority of the electors, but there is no longer any possibility of multiple candidates winning presidential electoral votes from a majority of electors. The Twelfth Amendment also lowered the number of candidates eligible to be selected by the House in a presidential contingent election from five to three, established that the Senate would hold a contingent election for vice president if no candidate won a majority of the vice presidential electoral vote, and provided that no individual constitutionally ineligible to the office of president would be eligible to serve as vice president.
Remember, President Trump has said he WON and he hasn’t backed down:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325099845045071873?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1325099845045071873%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcms.qz.com%2Fembed-sandbox%2F1928848%2Ftwitter.com%2FrealDonaldTrump%2Fstatus%2F1325099845045071873
Does this look like a many ready to concede?
Nope!
And from CNBC:
He then offered an answer to the question many have been asking: What if Trump refuses to ever concede? “He may never concede; he doesn’t have to concede,” Yoo said. “The thing about the American Constitution is that it doesn’t actually require the sitting president to do anything one way or the other. On January 20th, Donald Trump’s term ends and Joe Biden’s, I believe, will begin.”
QZ.com confirms how the 12th Amendment works:
States allow the popular vote to determine the appointment of electors, but Trump and his allies could use friendly state legislatures and governors to send alternate—or in the case of states with Republican legislatures and Democratic governors, additional—electors. When the electoral college convenes on Dec. 14, states with competing electors would cast double their allotted votes, forcing Senate president Mike Pence to figure out what to do with the doubled-up votes. If Pence threw out the extra votes and neither candidate hit 270, the decision goes to the House. There, each state delegation gets one vote; currently, in 27 states, a majority of delegates are Republican. (For a trip down memory lane: Back in 2000, Florida’s Republican legislature was on the cusp of appointing new electors to vote for Bush as the court-ordered recount dragged on. The SCOTUS decision rendered that preparation moot. Also, in 1876, states sent competing electoral college delegations and after Congress failed for months to agree on which was valid, a last-minute deal was struck that made Rutherford B. Hayes president as long as he agreed to end Reconstruction.)
And from TheConversation.com:
Congress will open and record the votes of the Electoral College in Washington, DC, on January 6, 2021. But this time when, as per the 12th amendment of the US Constitution, “the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates,” the procedure may not be a simple formality. Because each house is controlled by a different party, each may approve their own list, or both houses may reject the electors from some states. The legal framework is so vague that no one outcome can be certain. In case of a tie, the 12th Amendment states that “the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President” and that “the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote”. As things stand, this method of adding up state representations rather that the individual votes of the 435 representatives would give the Republicans a majority to reelect their candidate. But everything hinges on the elections in the House and Senate, also on November 3, since the final decision would be up to the members of the new Congress, to be installed on January 3, 2021. Incidentally, the current Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, is an unparalleled strategist who has already mapped the districts the Democrats must win on November 3 in order to have not only a seat majority but also a majority of blue states in the House of Representatives.
Here is even more on the history and working of the 12th Amendment, from the ConstitutionCenter.org:


welovetrump--2020-12-17--Attorney Lin Wood Slams Justice Roberts, Suspects That He Went To Epstein’s Island And Is In The Fli

Attorney Lin Wood Slams Justice Roberts, Suspects That He Went To Epstein’s Island And Is In The Flight Log!

Aside from being a star attorney , who has won numerous high profile cases , he is not one to @ @ @ @ @ why these suspicions are pretty serious , he is not going to throw words around @ @ @ @ @ , There are of course legal loopholes when suspecting something vs stating it as fact @ @ @ @ @ is probably not going to risk it , simply as a cheap publicity stunt .
@ @ @ @ @ Attorney Wood had to say :

Lin Wood is a pretty serious man.
Aside from being a star attorney, who has won numerous high profile cases, he is not one to mince words.
Which is why these suspicions are pretty serious, he is not going to throw words around and risk a slander lawsuit, There are of course legal loopholes when suspecting something vs stating it as fact,
But still, he is probably not going to risk it, simply as a cheap publicity stunt.
Take a look at what Attorney Wood had to say:


welovetrump--2020-12-17--Director Of Intelligence John Ratcliffe Confirms Foreign Election Interference, Names CCP, Iran And

Director Of Intelligence John Ratcliffe Confirms Foreign Election Interference, Names CCP, Iran And Russia

Those of you who have been following recent events closely , understand that the DNI Ratcliffe has issued dire warning @ @ @ @ @ Chinese Communist Party ’ s targeting of America .
Now The Director of National Intelligence @ @ @ @ @ by foreign actors DID in fact occur , contrary to repeated denial by the intelligence @ @ @ @ @ be related to the deep state ?
Or could it be the obvious fact that @ @ @ @ @ , or a group of people , you do not tell them you are investigating @ @ @ @ @ a look through the facts , and come to your own conclusions

The ground is shifting…..
Those of you who have been following recent events closely, understand that the DNI Ratcliffe has issued dire warning after dire warning on The Chinese Communist Party’s targeting of America.
Now The Director of National Intelligence has confirmed that election interference by foreign actors DID in fact occur, contrary to repeated denial by the intelligence community.
Could this denial be related to the deep state? Or could it be the obvious fact that if you are investigating someone, or a group of people, you do not tell them you are investigating?
As always, take a look through the facts, and come to your own conclusions
Take a look:


welovetrump--2020-12-17--Hunter Biden Text Thread: “He Strengthens Our USP To Chinese, As It Looks Like A Truly Family Busine

Hunter Biden Text Thread: “He Strengthens Our USP To Chinese, As It Looks Like A Truly Family Business”

Recent texts relating to the Biden-China investigation have revealed that Hunter ’ s business partners had no qualms about involving @ @ @ @ @ thier dealings with Chinese nationals .
In fact they welcomed it , as it appears @ @ @ @ @ Biden to join in to give an apparent cover for what must be some sort @ @ @ @ @ The text thread indicates that the partners wanted this to look like some sort of @ @ @ @ @ it was in fact , not .
This comes after denials have been made by @ @ @ @ @ , repeatedly over various aspects of thier Chinese business dealings , and attempts to thwart @ @ @ @ @ also further implicated Joe Biden in the scandal .
Here is the latest :

Breaking News here tonight everyone
Recent texts relating to the Biden-China investigation have revealed that Hunter’s business partners had no qualms about involving his father Joe Biden in thier dealings with Chinese nationals.
In fact they welcomed it, as it appears that they wanted the elder Biden to join in to give an apparent cover for what must be some sort of shady business dealings.
The text thread indicates that the partners wanted this to look like some sort of innocent family business, when it was in fact, not.
This comes after denials have been made by both Hunter and Joe Biden, repeatedly over various aspects of thier Chinese business dealings, and attempts to thwart congressional investigation.
Earlier emails also further implicated Joe Biden in the scandal.
Here is the latest:


welovetrump--2020-12-17--Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer Uses Santa Claus to Coerce Children to Obey Lockdown Rules

I ’ ve been juggling the debate of most evil , corrupt governor in America for months .
Those have been my top 3 candidates for the grand prize .
I thought Cuomo and Newsom were pulling away but wicked witch Whitmer catapulted herself back in the picture with this disgusting clip .
Using Santa Claus to mind-warp these little children to become good little servants of her authoritative rule over Michigan .
Where are the parents ?
Did they force their children to listen to her and this lefty Santa ?
Or , were they paid by the state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
All the elves are masking up .
This is how we lose generations of Americans to this propaganda .
These cultural Marxists prey on the innocent minds of children and use joyful figures like Santa to turn them into obedient sheep .
It ’ s sick and disgusting what this woman is doing to these children and she ’ s climbing the ladder for most wicked governor in America .
This utter insanity is psychologically damaging the minds of our children .
The future of this country .
And the left is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government .
Michigan Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer ( D ) hosted a video conference call with Santa Claus for children on Wednesday , during which he encouraged the children to “ social distance , wash your hands and make sure you wear your mask.
” The video began with Whitmer introducing Santa to the various children who had gathered virtually for the call .
One little boy asked Santa if he had to wear a mask , to which he replied , “ When I ’ m in my workshop with all my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and social distancing.
” Another told Santa he would set out hand sanitizer along with cookies and milk , which Whitmer called “ a good suggestion.
” And a group of children asked Santa if the coronavirus had reached the North Pole .
“ Everyone has been testing negative .
We ’ re still getting tested , ” said Santa .
“ I think we ’ re so far north that it might not be getting to us , but we ’ re not gon na take any chances .
We ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re all going to wash our hands and we ’ re all going to stay six feet apart.
” “ What I would suggest to do is what the governor is telling all the people of the great state of Michigan to do : Social distance , wash your hands and make sure you wear your mask when you ’ re outside your home , ” he added .
In November , Michigan GOP lawmakers announced they would begin the process of calling for Whitmer ’ s impeachment .
State Rep. Matt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had “ crossed the line ” with her coronavirus restrictions and “ violated our Constitutional rights.
” Whitmer has defended her authority to call for restrictions and lockdowns if necessary .
Last week she extended Michigan ’ s statewide lockdown until Dec. 20 .
The state has seen a slight decline in coronavirus numbers since the lockdown , but health care experts have warned that the progress is fragile .
NATIONAL POLL : Are You Happy Melania Replaced Michelle As First Lady ?
And they ’ re instilling that into the minds of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is back in the race for worst governor .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
1,872 views
I’ve been juggling the debate of most evil, corrupt governor in America for months.
Cuomo, Newsom, Whitmer.
Those have been my top 3 candidates for the grand prize.
I thought Cuomo and Newsom were pulling away but wicked witch Whitmer catapulted herself back in the picture with this disgusting clip.
.@GovWhitmer invites Santa Claus… to tell children to obey her lockdown rulespic.twitter.com/TyYaerQe4q — Young Americans for Liberty (@YALiberty) December 16, 2020
Using Santa Claus to mind-warp these little children to become good little servants of her authoritative rule over Michigan.
Where are the parents?
Did they force their children to listen to her and this lefty Santa?
Or, were they paid by the state to fill their heads with this nonsense?
All the elves are masking up.
Give me a break.
This is how we lose generations of Americans to this propaganda.
These cultural Marxists prey on the innocent minds of children and use joyful figures like Santa to turn them into obedient sheep.
It’s sick and disgusting what this woman is doing to these children and she’s climbing the ladder for most wicked governor in America.
Nasty anti human being Democrat MI Governor Gretchen Whitmer is propagandizing children, using Santa Claus to push for no celebration of Christmas with family and friends. Sick wicked evil woman. 😎✨ https://t.co/foQO5UC05U — Henry Kringle 🆓🎁✨ (@ICanPlainlySee) December 17, 2020
https://twitter.com/PaulsWalls2/status/1339648004874244096
It's hilarious that right after Santa says, ”We’re all gonna stay six feet apart,” you see a group of kids altogether 😂🤣. They don't even have coherence within their leftist videos. Poor kids! 🤦🏻♀ — Eva B.C. (@eva2712) December 17, 2020
https://twitter.com/jenb327/status/1339643150537809920
https://twitter.com/ScottAChapman/status/1339641687954628609
This utter insanity is psychologically damaging the minds of our children.
The future of this country.
And the left is poisoning their minds to never question their government.
The Hill touched on Whitmer’s Santa Claus charade:
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) hosted a video conference call with Santa Claus for children on Wednesday, during which he encouraged the children to “social distance, wash your hands and make sure you wear your mask.” The video began with Whitmer introducing Santa to the various children who had gathered virtually for the call. One little boy asked Santa if he had to wear a mask, to which he replied, “When I’m in my workshop with all my elves, we all are masked up and social distancing.” Another told Santa he would set out hand sanitizer along with cookies and milk, which Whitmer called “a good suggestion.” And a group of children asked Santa if the coronavirus had reached the North Pole. “Everyone has been testing negative. We’re still getting tested,” said Santa. “I think we’re so far north that it might not be getting to us, but we’re not gonna take any chances. We’re all gonna mask up, we’re all going to wash our hands and we’re all going to stay six feet apart.” “What I would suggest to do is what the governor is telling all the people of the great state of Michigan to do: Social distance, wash your hands and make sure you wear your mask when you’re outside your home,” he added.
The article also added:
NATIONAL POLL: Should Fauci Be Prosecuted For LYING To Congress? In November, Michigan GOP lawmakers announced they would begin the process of calling for Whitmer’s impeachment. State Rep. Matt Maddock (R) claimed that she had “crossed the line” with her coronavirus restrictions and “violated our Constitutional rights.” Whitmer has defended her authority to call for restrictions and lockdowns if necessary. Last week she extended Michigan’s statewide lockdown until Dec. 20. The state has seen a slight decline in coronavirus numbers since the lockdown, but health care experts have warned that the progress is fragile.
Nothing but fear, fear, fear!
And they’re instilling that into the minds of children.
It’s disgusting.
After this stunt, Whitmer is back in the race for worst governor.


welovetrump--2020-12-17--ESPN Analyst Wants Bill’s QB To Fail Because His Fanbase Loves The American Flag

ESPN has really changed over the years .
When I was younger , I would wake up extra earlier to hear the stat lines of my favorite athletes but nowadays all the ESPN analysts just argue about whether or not an athlete ’ s tweet is politically correct or not .
Well , just when things couldn ’ t get worse over at ESPN they just did .
ESPN analyst Dominique Foxworth when talking about Bill ’ s starting QB Josh Allen said he gets happy when Josh Allen makes mistakes and was on record saying the reason he ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is “ because the people who are telling me that Josh is the second coming and Josh is better than everybody are people with American flags ” .
Bills players didn ’ t take Foxworth ’ s comments lightly and defended Allen right away .
The Buffalo Bills are one of the best teams in the NFL and are not taking any type of criticism lightly .
Bills players heard the Josh Allen bashing from ESPN personality Dominque Foxworth , a former NFL cornerback and chief operating officer of the National Basketball Players @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week .
“ I am fully aware that I have biases .
And my biases are not based on Josh Allen .
It ’ s based on the people that are defending Josh Allen .
I would be 100 % lying if I said that when Josh does something dumb , a little part of me doesn ’ t get happy .
And it ’ s not because I don ’ t want Josh to succeed , ” Foxworth said on Bomani Jones ’ podcast , via Outkick .
“ It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Josh is the second coming and Josh is better than everybody are people with American flags and dogs and skulls and crossbones .
… If you go just take a dip into their tweet history , it ’ s some really concerning retweets and likes .
… It ’ s not about Josh.
” The Washington Examiner commented on the story too : Former NFL player and ESPN host Dominique Foxworth took issue with supporters of NFL quarterback Josh Allen because they are “ people with American flags and dogs and skull @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aware that I have biases , and my biases are not based on Josh Allen , ” Foxworth said during a conversation with ESPN ’ s Bomani Jones before criticizing those who support Allen .
“ It ’ s based on the people that are defending Josh Allen , ” Foxworth continued .
“ I would be 100 % lying if I said that when Josh does something dumb , a little part of me doesn ’ t get happy … because the people who are telling me that Josh is the Second @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are people with American flags and dogs and skull and crossbones.
” NATIONAL POLL : Is CNN The Enemy Of The People ?
I think ESPN should make sure analyst don ’ t spill out anti-America rhetoric .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
4,979 views
ESPN has really changed over the years.
When I was younger, I would wake up extra earlier to hear the stat lines of my favorite athletes but nowadays all the ESPN analysts just argue about whether or not an athlete’s tweet is politically correct or not.
Well, just when things couldn’t get worse over at ESPN they just did.
ESPN analyst Dominique Foxworth when talking about Bill’s starting QB Josh Allen said he gets happy when Josh Allen makes mistakes and was on record saying the reason he’s not a big fan of Allen is “because the people who are telling me that Josh is the second coming and Josh is better than everybody are people with American flags”.
Bills players didn’t take Foxworth’s comments lightly and defended Allen right away.
Bills players are firing back at an ESPN analyst who said he roots for quarterback Josh Allen to fail because Allen’s fans have the American flag in their profile pic. ESPN declines comment on issue: https://t.co/sZvwieMNbQ — Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) December 16, 2020
Hey #BillsMafia 👀@BuffaloBills players were defending their fans after @espn commentator, Domonique Foxworth, was on “The Right Time with Bomani Jones" on Wednesday.
Foxworth said he is rooting *against* Josh Allen b/c of #Bills fans “concerning” tweets & likes
Listen below 👇🏻 pic.twitter.com/F8Lvr3Onw9 — Jeannie McBride (@jeanniemcbride_) December 17, 2020
Hold up bruh… 🧐we not jus letting this slide, yeah?! @espn this what we on now in the sports world!? @Foxworth24 we gotta do better my brother… cause this ain’t it https://t.co/xsAHO6hiqH — Jordan poyer (@J_poyer21) December 16, 2020
Fox News covered Foxworth’s hateful comments:
The Buffalo Bills are one of the best teams in the NFL and are not taking any type of criticism lightly. Bills players heard the Josh Allen bashing from ESPN personality Dominque Foxworth, a former NFL cornerback and chief operating officer of the National Basketball Players Association, on a podcast earlier this week. “I am fully aware that I have biases. And my biases are not based on Josh Allen. It’s based on the people that are defending Josh Allen. I would be 100% lying if I said that when Josh does something dumb, a little part of me doesn’t get happy. And it’s not because I don’t want Josh to succeed,” Foxworth said on Bomani Jones’ podcast, via Outkick. “It’s because the people who are telling me that Josh is the second coming and Josh is better than everybody are people with American flags and dogs and skulls and crossbones. … If you go just take a dip into their tweet history, it’s some really concerning retweets and likes. … It’s not about Josh.”
ay @Foxworth24 are you talking about the fans that just raise over 700k for a hospital during a pandemic? Ppl do/say the corniest things to try n get ahead — Jonathan Feliciano (@MongoFeliciano) December 16, 2020
ESPN analyst says he roots for Bills quarterback Josh Allen to fail because Allen’s supporters are the kind of guys who have American flags on their profile pics. How dare they?! https://t.co/dMwskkMjRm — Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) December 15, 2020
The Washington Examiner commented on the story too:
Former NFL player and ESPN host Dominique Foxworth took issue with supporters of NFL quarterback Josh Allen because they are “people with American flags and dogs and skull and crossbones.” “I am fully aware that I have biases, and my biases are not based on Josh Allen,” Foxworth said during a conversation with ESPN’s Bomani Jones before criticizing those who support Allen. “It’s based on the people that are defending Josh Allen,” Foxworth continued. “I would be 100% lying if I said that when Josh does something dumb, a little part of me doesn’t get happy … because the people who are telling me that Josh is the Second Coming and Josh is better than everybody are people with American flags and dogs and skull and crossbones.”
I think ESPN should make sure analyst don’t spill out anti-America rhetoric.
Sport talk shows have sadly turned into CNN.


welovetrump--2020-12-18--This Alabama Senator Was Called A Hero By Trump And Here’s Why

Senator Tommy Tuberville has just suggested that he plans to defy Mitch McConnell ’ s orders to not contest the election and object Biden ’ s Electoral College “ win ” .
Tuberville who was the former football coach of Auburn University just defeated Democrat Doug Jones and will take office on January 3rd .
This is just in time for Tuberville to reject Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election when Lawmakers meet on January 6th .
After Tuberville ’ s statements , Trump took to Twitter and was quoted saying “ Tommy will be more popular @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ .
Rep. Mo Brooks from Alabama has already come out saying he will object Biden ’ s “ victory ” .
With both Brooks and Tuberville reject Biden as the winner this would lead to a vote in each house of Congress on a motion to overturn the election results .
USA Today covered the story and dropped these details : As Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell tries to tamp down efforts in the Senate to reject President-elect Joe Biden ’ s election victory , some Republican senators are suggesting they might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weeks before a joint session of Congress convenes Jan. 6 to count votes cast by the Electoral College , which elected Biden over President Donald Trump by a 306-232 vote margin Monday .
Some House Republicans have said they intend to object to Biden ’ s slate of electors in some states .
“ You ’ ll see what ’ s coming , ” Sen.-elect Tommy Tuberville , R-Ala. , said this week .
“ You ’ ve been reading about in the House .
We ’ re going to have to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in with these details : Senator-elect Tommy Tuberville ( R-Ala. ) may be joining Republican efforts to challenge the electoral college vote count on January 6 .
According to reports on Thursday , Tuberville is likely to join Rep. Mo Brooks ( R-Ala. ) in this effort to push against votes for Joe Biden .
When both chambers of Congress meet , Brooks indicated he plans to reject the electoral college vote submissions from states with flawed election systems .
It looks like the state of Alabam hasn ’ t turned its back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Out My New Site , NoahReport.com !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
12,406 views
Huge news!
Senator Tommy Tuberville has just suggested that he plans to defy Mitch McConnell’s orders to not contest the election and object Biden’s Electoral College “win”.
Tuberville who was the former football coach of Auburn University just defeated Democrat Doug Jones and will take office on January 3rd.
This is just in time for Tuberville to reject Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election when Lawmakers meet on January 6th.
After Tuberville’s statements, Trump took to Twitter and was quoted saying “Tommy will be more popular than ever before – a hero!’.
Rep. Mo Brooks from Alabama has already come out saying he will object Biden’s “victory”.
With both Brooks and Tuberville reject Biden as the winner this would lead to a vote in each house of Congress on a motion to overturn the election results.
Sen.-elect Tommy Tuberville defies Mitch McConnell, opens door to Electoral College challenge in Senate #ICYMI https://t.co/hOcm0lZ4us — TheBlaze (@theblaze) December 18, 2020
WATCH: Sen.-elect Tuberville suggests he'll back effort to challenge Electoral College vote despite McConnell pleas https://t.co/YGBkE0JDTA pic.twitter.com/4QI9vvnHdj — The Hill (@thehill) December 18, 2020
Sen-Elect Tommy Tuberville suggested he would back Rep. Mo Brooks to challenge the results of the Electoral College on Jan 6 "You'll see what's coming. You've been reading about in the House. We're going to have to do it in the Senate" pic.twitter.com/xu5KcUWcn0 — Mona Salama (@MonaSalama_) December 18, 2020
USA Today covered the story and dropped these details:
As Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell tries to tamp down efforts in the Senate to reject President-elect Joe Biden’s election victory, some Republican senators are suggesting they might buck his warning. The discord comes weeks before a joint session of Congress convenes Jan. 6 to count votes cast by the Electoral College, which elected Biden over President Donald Trump by a 306-232 vote margin Monday. Some House Republicans have said they intend to object to Biden’s slate of electors in some states. “You’ll see what’s coming,” Sen.-elect Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., said this week. “You’ve been reading about in the House. We’re going to have to do it in the Senate.”
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1339748940380577792
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1339758142381551629
OANN chipped in with these details:
Senator-elect Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) may be joining Republican efforts to challenge the electoral college vote count on January 6. According to reports on Thursday, Tuberville is likely to join Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) in this effort to push against votes for Joe Biden. When both chambers of Congress meet, Brooks indicated he plans to reject the electoral college vote submissions from states with flawed election systems.
It looks like the state of Alabam hasn’t turned its back on Trump!
Sen.-elect @TTuberville: "I'm always going to support President @realDonaldTrump. He’s the best president of my lifetime and has done more for the people of this country and the state of Alabama than anybody. "We want to make sure we do the right thing.” https://t.co/Gwvc8IZvRv — Kyle Morris (@RealKyleMorris) December 18, 2020
https://twitter.com/Raiklin/status/1339754325309054976