welovetrump--2020-12-29--DC Hotel Harrington REFUSES to Accommodate Pro-Trump Guests for January 6 Rally!

Just when you thought the Swamp couldn ’ t get any worse .
Hotel Harrington in Washington DC has announced that it will CLOSE on January 4 , 5 , and 6 , 2021 .
This is not a coincidence .
The hotel has CONFIRMED that it will NOT be accommodating Trump supporters .
If you ’ ve already made reservations at the hotel for the January 6 , 2021 protest , Hotel Harrington will be giving you a refund .
Washington D.C. has been our home for 106 years and we join with all of our guests , visitors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and desire for everyone ’ s health and safety .
We greatly appreciate the trust our guests have placed in Hotel Harrington over the years and we wish to continue to earn that trust .
While we can not control what happens outside of the hotel , we are taking additional steps to protect the safety of our visitors , guests and employees .
Hotel Harrington will be closed on January 4 , 5 and 6 .
We will not be accommodating guests , with the exception of our long-term residents who call @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made for pre-paid reservations .
Notifications are being sent to all reservation-holders beginning today .
Did Hotel Harrington close for the Women ’ s March ?
Did they close for the countless BLM marches over the summer ?
If not , then why are they refusing service to Trump supporters ?
Is that not discrimination ?
!
Many Trump supporters who are traveling to the DC area have been finding accommodations a little outside of downtown .
It appears that their concern was warranted .
Hopefully Hotel Harrington ’ s actions don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ follow suit .
Local FOX 5 DC confirms the hotel ’ s move , which some have claimed is discriminatory : Hotel Harrington and Harry ’ s bar – magnets for right-wing protesters who ’ ve flocked to D.C. for pro-Trump presidents in recent months – will be closed during the next planned demonstration .
The hotel posted a statement on its Facebook page on Monday indicating that it will close Jan. 4 , 5 and 6 .
Last week , the Washington Post reported that activists were planning protests that weekend – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ results of the election .
Protesters have poured into D.C. twice since the election to protest the results , which indicated that former Vice President Joe Biden had defeated President Donald Trump .
Fury over the closure is beginning to build on social media .
Many people are slamming Hotel Harrington for closing for Trump supporters , but accommodating other protests .
The liberal media has been criticizing Hotel Harrington .
They ’ ve also been misrepresenting the Proud Boys .
Is this why the hotel caved ?
Here ’ s an example @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Seattle Times : Located five blocks from the White House , the Hotel Harrington is the city ’ s oldest continuously operating hotel and has a long-standing reputation as one of the most affordable hotels in the heart of the District of Columbia .
But over the past few months , the Harrington has been gaining a new reputation : Proud Boys hangout .
The militant right-wing organization that supports President Donald Trump , which has clashed in violent street battles with members of anti-fascist groups and others who oppose Trump , has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ members come to the city .
Several hundred Proud Boys recently stayed at the hotel while in town for the Dec. 12 protest of Joe Biden ’ s election .
More protests by pro-Trump groups are planned in downtown D.C. on Jan. 6 .
Wearing their signature black and gold colors , large numbers of the group spent much of the afternoon of Dec. 12 drinking openly and chanting on the street in front of the hotel .
They ranged in age from late teenagers to 50- and 60-year-olds , though most appeared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Others filled the outdoor patio at Harry ’ s , the hotel bar , where they had gathered on previous protest weekends and on the Fourth of July .
Harry ’ s closed midafternoon , but the patio and street in front of it remained crowded throughout the night .
The repeated and growing presence of Proud Boys at the bar and hotel has unnerved some guests and workers , many of whom are Black and Hispanic and were intimidated by their presence , according to two employees who spoke on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authorized to speak publicly .
In the past three months , Harry ’ s has been cited three times for violating social distancing and mask regulations .
The violations occurred on weekends when large numbers of Proud Boys and other pro-Trump supporters , in town for demonstrations , were in the bar .
For the hotel and the bar , there seems to be uncertainty about what steps they can or should take .
Ann Terry , the general manager of the hotel , declined to comment .
During a brief phone call @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Harry ’ s , declined to comment other than to say that the bar closed early on Dec. 11 and 12 because of concerns over not being able to maintain coronavirus social distancing guidelines .
The bar ’ s website announced that it will be closed on Jan. 5 and 6 .
If they caved due to media pressure , that really would be a shame .
Don ’ t we have a right to free speech ?
And a right to vote ?
If so , then why would a hotel block @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
It especially doesn ’ t look right when you consider that the hotel was likely open during the Women ’ s March and BLM protests .
NATIONAL POLL : Should Ilhan Omar Be IMPEACHED and Removed From Office ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
2,941 views
Just when you thought the Swamp couldn’t get any worse.
Hotel Harrington in Washington DC has announced that it will CLOSE on January 4, 5, and 6, 2021.
And no…
This is not a coincidence.
The hotel has CONFIRMED that it will NOT be accommodating Trump supporters.
If you’ve already made reservations at the hotel for the January 6, 2021 protest, Hotel Harrington will be giving you a refund.
Their statement reads:
Washington D.C. has been our home for 106 years and we join with all of our guests, visitors, staff and neighbors in our concern and desire for everyone’s health and safety. We greatly appreciate the trust our guests have placed in Hotel Harrington over the years and we wish to continue to earn that trust. While we cannot control what happens outside of the hotel, we are taking additional steps to protect the safety of our visitors, guests and employees. Hotel Harrington will be closed on January 4, 5 and 6. We will not be accommodating guests, with the exception of our long-term residents who call our hotel home. Refunds will be made for pre-paid reservations. Notifications are being sent to all reservation-holders beginning today.
We have a simple question…
Did Hotel Harrington close for the Women’s March?
Did they close for the countless BLM marches over the summer?
If not, then why are they refusing service to Trump supporters?
Is that not discrimination?!
Hotel Harrington and its connected “Harry’s Bar” in Washington DC are known as the hangout spot for conservatives in Washington DC. As Trump supporters plan one last pre-inauguration protest for January 6th to “Stop the Steal,” Hotel Harrington is announcing Jan 4-6 closures. pic.twitter.com/tvSA9Kkqgh — Ford Fischer (@FordFischer) December 29, 2020
The Proud Boys have made Hotel Harrington their gathering spot when they're in D.C. The hotel just put out a statement that they'll close January 4th-6th, when thousands of Trump supporters are expected to come to the capitol for a last-ditch rally. Many just lost reservations pic.twitter.com/t9UQov7loQ — philip lewis (@Phil_Lewis_) December 29, 2020
https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1343775371188170757
https://twitter.com/pittman_george/status/1343784801250242560
Many Trump supporters who are traveling to the DC area have been finding accommodations a little outside of downtown.
It appears that their concern was warranted.
Hopefully Hotel Harrington’s actions don’t “inspire” other hotels to follow suit.
Local FOX 5 DC confirms the hotel’s move, which some have claimed is discriminatory:
Hotel Harrington and Harry’s bar – magnets for right-wing protesters who’ve flocked to D.C. for pro-Trump presidents in recent months – will be closed during the next planned demonstration. The hotel posted a statement on its Facebook page on Monday indicating that it will close Jan. 4, 5 and 6. Last week, the Washington Post reported that activists were planning protests that weekend – when Congress is slated to certify the results of the election. Protesters have poured into D.C. twice since the election to protest the results, which indicated that former Vice President Joe Biden had defeated President Donald Trump.
Fury over the closure is beginning to build on social media.
Many people are slamming Hotel Harrington for closing for Trump supporters, but accommodating other protests.
Close for the proud boys but not #BLM? @patriots #rememberthis DC's Hotel Harrington Closes for January 6 Pro-Trump March After Pressure Over Proud Boys https://t.co/fPfGoQ4v8a via @gatewaypundit — 7card21 (@7card21) December 29, 2020
https://twitter.com/KTopski/status/1343794110851915777
https://twitter.com/ImBryanWhite/status/1343791484177248257
The liberal media has been criticizing Hotel Harrington.
They’ve also been misrepresenting the Proud Boys.
Is this why the hotel caved?
Here’s an example of the media coverage a la The Seattle Times:
Located five blocks from the White House, the Hotel Harrington is the city’s oldest continuously operating hotel and has a long-standing reputation as one of the most affordable hotels in the heart of the District of Columbia. But over the past few months, the Harrington has been gaining a new reputation: Proud Boys hangout. The militant right-wing organization that supports President Donald Trump, which has clashed in violent street battles with members of anti-fascist groups and others who oppose Trump, has made the Harrington its unofficial headquarters when members come to the city. Several hundred Proud Boys recently stayed at the hotel while in town for the Dec. 12 protest of Joe Biden’s election. More protests by pro-Trump groups are planned in downtown D.C. on Jan. 6. Wearing their signature black and gold colors, large numbers of the group spent much of the afternoon of Dec. 12 drinking openly and chanting on the street in front of the hotel. They ranged in age from late teenagers to 50- and 60-year-olds, though most appeared to be in their 30s and 40s. Others filled the outdoor patio at Harry’s, the hotel bar, where they had gathered on previous protest weekends and on the Fourth of July. Harry’s closed midafternoon, but the patio and street in front of it remained crowded throughout the night. The repeated and growing presence of Proud Boys at the bar and hotel has unnerved some guests and workers, many of whom are Black and Hispanic and were intimidated by their presence, according to two employees who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. In the past three months, Harry’s has been cited three times for violating social distancing and mask regulations. The violations occurred on weekends when large numbers of Proud Boys and other pro-Trump supporters, in town for demonstrations, were in the bar. For the hotel and the bar, there seems to be uncertainty about what steps they can or should take. Ann Terry, the general manager of the hotel, declined to comment. During a brief phone call, John Boyle, the owner of Harry’s, declined to comment other than to say that the bar closed early on Dec. 11 and 12 because of concerns over not being able to maintain coronavirus social distancing guidelines. The bar’s website announced that it will be closed on Jan. 5 and 6.
If they caved due to media pressure, that really would be a shame.
Isn’t this America?
Don’t we have a right to free speech?
And a right to vote?
If so, then why would a hotel block people for staying during a political protest?
It especially doesn’t look right when you consider that the hotel was likely open during the Women’s March and BLM protests.
https://twitter.com/DrNealHouston/status/1343782940392759301


welovetrump--2020-12-30--Why Is President Trump So Calm?  Sometimes The Simplest Explanation Is The Right One…

This is something I ’ ve touched on many times in recent articles and in my Newsletter .
It ’ s something I can ’ t quite get over .
There is a lot happening right now that doesn ’ t make sense .
I think there are a lot of dots out there not yet connected and the fog of war is making things hard to see .
But one thing we can see and to me it ’ s been one of the most glaring clues of anything… .
It ’ s how absolutely calm ( and quiet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election .
Have you noticed it ?
Almost to the point of seeming disengaged .
Yes , he still goes on some Tweet storms .
But overall he seems fairly calm and complacent .
And that means one of two things : Either ( 1 ) he ’ s lost and he ’ s basically admitted defeat and he ’ s just riding out the time until January 20 .
Or ( 2 ) he has it ALL and he ’ s just letting them continue to hang themselves and he ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ card when he ’ s damn well good and ready .
Given his Tweet storms and continuing legal challenges , # 1 just doesn ’ t ring true to me .
So that means it must be # 2….and can you even imagine ?
I ’ ve actually been saying it all along .
President Trump looks to me like a man who already holds all the cards and he knows it .
Remember all the things we ’ re not hearing about anymore .
Remember the raid on the Scytl server in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him all the real election results , undeniable proof of Trump ’ s win ?
Remember how he watched the election results live in that SCIFF and then Tweeted out that he watched the fraud happen live in realtime on election night ?
Will it be the watermarked ballots ?
Don ’ t forget about all these gems !
Well , enough of me rambling .
My friend Daniel Lee read an article from someone who pieced this all together much better than I just did .
It ’ s absolutely incredible and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ starts at about 12:30 minute mark : And be sure to follow my friend Daniel on Rumble .
You can find his channel right here : Love to hear what you think of this !

This is something I’ve touched on many times in recent articles and in my Newsletter.
It’s something I can’t quite get over.
There is a lot happening right now that doesn’t make sense.
I think there are a lot of dots out there not yet connected and the fog of war is making things hard to see.
But one thing we can see and to me it’s been one of the most glaring clues of anything….
It’s how absolutely calm (and quiet) President Trump has been since the election.
Have you noticed it?
Almost to the point of seeming disengaged.
Yes, he’s given a couple big press conferences.
Yes, he still goes on some Tweet storms.
But overall he seems fairly calm and complacent.
And that means one of two things:
Either (1) he’s lost and he’s basically admitted defeat and he’s just riding out the time until January 20.
Or (2) he has it ALL and he’s just letting them continue to hang themselves and he’s he will play the “Trump” card when he’s damn well good and ready.
Given his Tweet storms and continuing legal challenges, #1 just doesn’t ring true to me.
So that means it must be #2….and can you even imagine?
I’ve actually been saying it all along.
President Trump looks to me like a man who already holds all the cards and he knows it.
Remember all the things we’re not hearing about anymore.
Remember the raid on the Scytl server in Frankfurt, Germany?
Did that give him all the real election results, undeniable proof of Trump’s win?
Remember how he watched the election results live in that SCIFF and then Tweeted out that he watched the fraud happen live in realtime on election night?
Will it be the watermarked ballots?
Don’t forget about all these gems!
Well, enough of me rambling.
My friend Daniel Lee read an article from someone who pieced this all together much better than I just did.
It’s absolutely incredible and you have to hear it.
It starts at about 12:30 minute mark:
And be sure to follow my friend Daniel on Rumble.
You can find his channel right here:
Love to hear what you think of this!
For those of you that want to read instead of listening to the video, here is the full text.
Enjoy:
I have been following you for a few weeks now. I appreciate your efforts and enthusiasm. I have had a few thoughts that I wanted to share with you that you may want to consider as you make your analysis. I share these below:
I have been thinking about this a lot. Mainly because I believe we are actually at war and our country and families and future and in some ways our very lives are at stake and this is worth fighting for. It may be moving slowly and it may be obscured and hidden but deceivers and whisperers like for their deeds to be hidden like that.
It has been frustrating to watch because there is a lot of disinformation and confusing communications and theories and conclusions being thrown out there on both sides. We expect this from the swamp people but it also seems to be happening or at least being allowed by the Trump camp as well. This causes a wide range of things to be discussed and followed and like and tweeted and echoed, etc. However, if this deception and attack and subversion is as wide and deep and bad and dangerous as it appears to be to me then Trump does know the stakes and assuming he does, he knows better than us that we are in the most dangerous time for our country since WWII or perhaps some near nuclear event that we don’t know about.
We tend to get caught up in the day to day news and information drops. The big picture goes back to what activated all this—election day. Right now Trump appears to be pursuing multiple strategies simultaneously and all at once. It looks like he has no real overall plan but is trying anything he think might work and everyone is analyzing all these options. He is trying the courts, he is trying the states, he is trying by dripping out info., he is trying the Pence card, he is trying to get Congress to act, he has Guiliani doing hearings and filing suits, he has Lin Wood out there going nuts, he has Sydney Powell in the White House, he has Flynn calling for insurrection act—he is messaging and pushing all these things—but none of these things are breaking through and he actually seems powerless in many ways because the DS and MSM and politicians are all standing in his way and people are coming out of the woodwork to oppose all of this…..(some of this opposition is real some of this is acting—we just don’t know what is what—which is why we should be careful about calling certain people traitors while we are in the shadows stage of this battle). All the while the other side seems to be holding on by obstruction and lies—which has worked so well up until now why would they change anything. He is working hard though—they are suing to get machines, they are holding hearings. They are collecting and showing evidence. He has gone to the Supreme Court. He has made speeches to the American people. He has called out congress for their pork spending and disregard for the people. But nothing seems to be breaking through. He seems powerless. And though Trump is working hard, he seems to be getting nowhere and is just hoping for something to happen but not taking direct action. He could order some federal units to seize machines but isn’t. He could invoke the Insurrection Act but isn’t. He could declassify stuff but isn’t. He could call on the people to rise up and/or activate the militias. He could take many actions—but isn’t. Is that because the DS is so strong that Trump has no one on his side? Is Trump totally powerless? Is he just talking a big game and has no sand to back it up? Is he being neutered by his staff? Is he so weak he can’t even get a phone call out to Sydney Powell and a chief of staff blocks her from seeing him? Is he one of a few voices crying for justice only to be drowned out by the swamp? His proxies are suing to get access to the machines, and showing real fraud but not having success bc they are being blocked. The are suing over many valid offenses but not getting heard. They are calling for investigations but nothing big is happening. They seem powerless. The opposition seems to be successful at slow rolling and running out the clock.
It may look that way but I don’t think it is. Consider what happens when Trump does take decisive action—The 2018 EO is a signal marker. He calls out congress directly and they agree to $2,000 overnight. He appoints Chris Miller and immediately special forces are moved to DOD and they cut off supporting the CIA. He gets Durham appointed a special prosecutor and then moves Barr out of the way. There is serious military action happening behind the scenes. He is warning foreign powers to leave us alone and they know he means it. He put all the tools he needs in effect in advance—the EO of 2018, the 305th unit, Flynn pardon, He seized the servers in Germany. He watched the election intel in a SCIF. He has tools to take direct action if he wanted to—and perhaps a more desperate man with no other options would. Yet, it’s also curious what he is NOT doing or calling for. He is not calling for the Insurrection Act. He is not calling for military intervention. He is not sending federal agents to seize machines (could he? of course he could—he sent federal agents to Portland and other areas to take care of the riots and liberals went nuts over this because they couldn’t control the feds— Trump has federal assets he can employ and he has proven he will do it when he decides to). Even so, he is not taking direct actions but is calling for people to come clean and do the right thing and he is trying to follow the rules to get it done. It looks weak and ineffective but is it?
Remember the Normany invasion. The Germans knew the Allies were planning something big. They knew it had to be an invasion. They just didn’t know when or where exactly. The Allies were putting out all this disinformation and even had fake tanks and fake ships and feints and deception going on. And they also had cracked the German codes. They were listening and they even let people die without acting on their intel so the Germans wouldn’t know their code was broken. They had to wait to use it on something big. War winning big. Bigly as Trump would say. So they used deception and took losses and endured bombings and death until they had everything ready to commit to the ultimate invasion—they waited because it HAD to work.
In particular, Trump has never even hinted at new elections that some people are calling for. He is also not going nuts over the Georgia runoffs that seem to me to have incredibly important ramifications and that it appears they will use the same fraudulent tactics to try and steal these also—potentially resulting in the loss of presidency, House and senate. He doesn’t seem too worried about this. Why?
Normally when someone is against the wall they panic and follow anything that seems to be working well and rush down that path. Then they rush down the next path if that one stops working, etc. and they are here and there and all over the map and acting frenetic. Trump is not doing that. So far, he actually seems to be just politely participating in the game with them. If the stakes are so high, why isn’t he calling for new elections, calling for people to rise up and get involved, desperately pushing and yelling and well……just acting like the old Trump?
It’s because he is either already beaten or compromised and is faking it to play a role and save face—or he is already holding all the winning cards. If you listen to what his camp has said previously (that we seem to have forgotten in the fog of war and chaos and disinformation) they said they “have it all” and “saw it all” and “won in a landslide” and “watched it happen”. Trump doesn’t want another election because there is no need for another election if he clearly won this one. The people should not be interested in another election because he won the actual election fair and square! We don’t need a do-over, we just need to remove the enemy interference. Why worry about the runoff if there shouldn’t be one in the first place? Why be worried about the court cases if you don’t need them? Why seize the machines if you don’t need them? Why worry about the Supreme Court or docket times being after the 20th if you don’t need them? Why wouldn’t Trump really care if the Supreme Court gives a decision or doesn’t give a decision? Why is Trump so seemingly ambivalent about disloyal staff, disloyal AG, disloyal VP, disloyal courts, disloyal everything? Why isn’t he addressing the people and telling them to rise up and to arms? Why in the world is he so relaxed about this?
I think it’s because he can absolutely and convincingly without any doubt prove he won the election and he is just waiting for the right time to put this out and is using all this other time to prepare and to play “chicken” with the other side and run all types of counter intel ops and accomplish as much as he can under a position of passive-aggressive noncommittal disinformation deception ops to disguise his “D-Day” invasion. When he puts out the actual election numbers it is like launching D-Day. He will provide irrefutable proof that the actual winner of the election was Trump and probably other actual down ballot race winners as well. He will have tried every logical, legal, and honorable way to present his case and tell the truth and everyone on the other side who stood against Trump in this will have to face the fact that they supported liars and cheaters and enemies of the country. They will have to face the fact that they were lied to and went along because they were willing to compromise as well and they will have to make a cognitive decision to support the constitution, be loyal to the country and support the properly elected president or be a traitor, liar, cheater, and insurrectionist—whether they be senator, congressman, judge, journalist or Joe Citizen.
We haven’t heard squat about the Scytl servers. We haven’t heard squat from the DNI report. We haven’t heard squat about the foreign country intelligence on the election Flynn reported. Soon Trump is going to unveil the actual election results. That is why he doesn’t care about a new election or a runoff or Pence or Barr or any of this. He has not been acting like a desperate man who is being railroaded and has no options and no friends. He is acting like a man who holds all the cards and has a bunch of his biker buddies just outside the back door waiting to back him up. Trump knows he won the election and he knows he can prove it. He is being careful about disguising when and how he launches the P-Day (Patriot day) invasion. This is how it appears when looking at it dispassionately and in light of how Trump is acting—not talking.
Pelosi recently said that anyone who votes against her legislation would be voting against helping the people or something like that. She was trying to shame people into doing her will. Her words will be turned against her and it will be such that anyone who stands or votes against the real election results when they are disclosed will be viewed as a traitor. It may be that Biden concedes as part of this after seeing it all come out and may even be playing a part in that to be able to say he did the “honorable” thing in light of this “overwhelming” evidence of fraud and cheating because he loves truth and the constitution and his country.
Sometimes the simplest explanation is the best one to make sense of an unsolvable riddle. And the only thing that seems to explain all this craziness and deception and confusion and chaos and Trump’s steadiness in the midst of it all is that he knows he won, has the evidence to prove it and is going to bring it out at the right time. Another way to confirm this is to not only look forwards as to what would fit with what’s happening now but also to look backwards across the same explanation to see if his actions now fit looking back at it in hindsight. Taking that approach, even his actions when looked at in hindsight will be clean (meaning when it does come out people will say “you knew this all the while?”) and they will look at what he did and said in light of that. And looking back to date, it does appear to me that he has acted honorably and tried to get everyone to do the right thing and everything he said was true and in line exactly with proper action in light of an attack on our election and the country. He will gain incredible, amazing credibility and trust with the people.
And then he will be in great danger if he does not give the glory to God and continue to humble himself.
Trump is acting, not speaking, like a man who has already lost and is trying to save face; or like a man who has already won and is waiting for the right time for it to be revealed. I believe it is the latter.


welovetrump--2020-12-30--RESULTS ARE IN, Here’s What You Think About The Stimulus

Over the last 24 hours , I ’ ve asked you two important questions about the COVID Stimulus .
I wanted to see what your opinions were and whether I was being too “ heartless ” in my thinking .
Turns out we are ALL on the same page .
“ Big league ” you might even say !
The first question was : With nearly 2,000 of you voting , the results are clear : NO .
And I agree with you !
And then I had a similar , follow up question : NATIONAL POLL : Would You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ During The Pandemic ?
I thought this one might be a little different , but it was also a landslide .
With over 2,000 also voting on this one , you were resoundingly in favor of cutting off all foreign aid : And once again , I agree with you .
I know one of those 5 people who voted “ No ” was because they wanted to cut off all aid except to Israel .
BOOKMARK IT : Check Out My New Site , NoahReport.com !
But I am sick and tired @ @ @ @ @ @ @ friends of mine lose their businesses because of a fake planned-demic and tyrannical Governors only to take MILLIONS or even BILLIONS of dollars that could go to them and sending it to the Sudan or to Pakistan for “ gender studies ” .
We have lost our minds !
Every single American should be furious about this .
Why are we not rising up ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
11,873 views
Hi friends,
Over the last 24 hours, I’ve asked you two important questions about the COVID Stimulus.
I wanted to see what your opinions were and whether I was being too “heartless” in my thinking.
Turns out we are ALL on the same page.
In a big way.
“Big league” you might even say!
The first question was:
NATIONAL POLL: Do Illegal Immigrants Deserve Federal Stimulus Checks?
With nearly 2,000 of you voting, the results are clear: NO.
99.1% say absolutely not:
And I agree with you!
And then I had a similar, follow up question:
NATIONAL POLL: Would You Support President Trump Eliminating ALL Foreign Aid During The Pandemic?
I thought this one might be a little different, but it was also a landslide.
With over 2,000 also voting on this one, you were resoundingly in favor of cutting off all foreign aid:
And once again, I agree with you.
I know one of those 5 people who voted “No” was because they wanted to cut off all aid except to Israel.
I guess that’s undertandable.
But I am sick and tired of being taxed to death and seeing friends of mine lose their businesses because of a fake planned-demic and tyrannical Governors only to take MILLIONS or even BILLIONS of dollars that could go to them and sending it to the Sudan or to Pakistan for “gender studies”.
We have lost our minds!
Every single American should be furious about this.
Why are we not rising up?


welovetrump--2020-12-30--BREAKING NEWS: First Case of “Significantly More Contagious” U.K. Variant of COVID-19 Found in Ameri

BREAKING NEWS: First Case of “Significantly More Contagious” U.K. Variant of COVID-19 Found in America

Get ready for the tyrants to unleash their fury !
Within the United States , they ’ ve detected the variant of COVID-19 that has caused a chaotic mess and ramped up restrictions in the United Kingdom .
The patient in question is a young man in his 20s who lives in tiny Elbert County , on the outskirts of Denver .
He has no travel history .
Since the strain was discovered in a rural inland county and in a person with no travel history , it appears the strain has likely been in America for a while .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
It may be more transmissible , but it ’ s no more dangerous .
The same therapeutics and vaccines are believed to be equally as effective against this variant .
Still , you can bet that tyrannical governors and mayors will use the new variant as an excuse to tighten their grips against American citizens .
They ’ ll certainly use it to enforce more draconian lockdowns , mask mandates , and strip the American people of their civil liberties .
That ’ s why it is more important than ever to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ POLL : Should Ilhan Omar Be IMPEACHED and Removed From Office ?
If we don ’ t , they ’ ll take full advantage of every “ emergency ” at their disposal .
The mainstream media is already ramping up the fear campaigns to scare the public .
From the Associated Press : “ There is a lot we don ’ t know about this new COVID-19 variant , but scientists in the United Kingdom are warning the world that it is significantly more contagious .
The health and safety of Coloradans is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ closely monitor this case , as well as all COVID-19 indicators , very closely , ” Polis said .
The discovery of the new variant led the CDC to issue new rules on Christmas Day for travelers arriving to the U.S. from the U.K. , requiring they show proof of a negative COVID-19 test .
Worry has been growing about the variant since the weekend before Christmas , when Britain ’ s prime minister said a new strain of the coronavirus seemed to spread more easily than earlier ones and was moving rapidly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first variant case was identified in southeast England .
Dozens of countries barred flights from the U.K. , and southern England was placed under strict lockdown measures .
Scientists say there is reason for concern but the new strains should not cause alarm .
Japan announced Monday it would bar entry of all nonresident foreign nationals as a precaution against the new strain .
New variants of the coronavirus have been seen almost since the virus was first detected in China nearly a year ago .
It is common for viruses to undergo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through a population .
The slight modifications are how scientists track the spread of a virus from one place to another .
But if the virus has significant mutations , one concern is that current vaccines might no longer offer the same protections .
Although that ’ s a possibility to watch for over time with the coronavirus , experts say they don ’ t believe it will be the case with the latest variant .
The U.K. variant , known as B.1.1.7 , has also been found in Canada , Italy , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And from the Washington Post : The Colorado case involves a man in his 20s , who is in isolation in Elbert County , about 50 miles southeast of Denver , and has no travel history , according to a tweet from the office of Gov .
Jared Polis ( D ) .
“ The individual has no close contacts identified so far but public health officials are working to identify other potential cases and contacts through thorough contact tracing interviews , ” the statement said .
A federal scientist familiar with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of known travel — in contrast with most confirmed cases outside the United Kingdom — indicates this is probably not an isolated case .
“ We can expect that it will be detected elsewhere , ” said the official , who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the broader context of the announcement .
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed as much in a statement Tuesday afternoon , saying additional cases with the new variant will be detected in the United States in coming days .
The variant ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lead to more cases and place greater demand on already strained health care resources , ” the agency said in a statement .
Researchers have detected the more transmissible variant in at least 17 countries outside the United Kingdom , including as far away as Australia and South Korea , as of Tuesday afternoon .
Officials in Canada had previously said they had identified two cases .
Although the U.K. variant appears more contagious , it is not leading to higher rates of hospitalizations or deaths , according to a report from Public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nor is there any sign that people who were infected months ago with the coronavirus are more likely to be reinfected if exposed to the variant , according to the report .
All available evidence indicates that vaccines , and immunity built up in the population , should be protective against this variant .
The Colorado case occurred in a county of about 27,000 , which is currently classified , along with much of the state , in the “ red ” level for the virus , denoting serious but not extreme risk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people gathered at a community church in the county seat of Kiowa to consider whether to pursue legal actions against Polis and other state officials for imposing coronavirus-related restrictions , according to the Elbert County News .
County commissioners and the county sheriff have declined to enforce restrictions emanating from Denver .
“ I was expecting to see it in ski country first because those areas are where people from across Colorado , the U.S. and internationally , gather , ” said Elizabeth Carlton , an assistant professor of environmental and occupational health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The absence of any apparent travel history associated with the infected person , she said , suggests he “ can ’ t be the only case in Colorado .
”

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
3,285 views
Get ready for the tyrants to unleash their fury!
Again.
Within the United States, they’ve detected the variant of COVID-19 that has caused a chaotic mess and ramped up restrictions in the United Kingdom.
Today we discovered Colorado’s first case of the COVID-19 variant B.1.1.7, the same variant discovered in the UK. The health and safety of Coloradans is our top priority and we will monitor this case, as well as all COVID-19 indicators, very closely. pic.twitter.com/fjyq7QhzBi — Governor Jared Polis (@GovofCO) December 29, 2020
BREAKING: A variant of COVID-19 first discovered in the UK has been found in Colorado, according to reports. https://t.co/CDjgoTuIJa — WSOCTV (@wsoctv) December 29, 2020
BREAKING: The first reported U.S. case of the COVID-19 variant that's been seen in the United Kingdom has been discovered in Colorado, the governor says. https://t.co/qZwtDBWyb3 — The Associated Press (@AP) December 29, 2020
JUST IN: The first known US case of a variant coronavirus strain — recently identified in the UK — has been found in Colorado, Governor Jared Polis announced on Tuesday. https://t.co/dBxVH4NLPo — NewsWatch 12 (@KDRV) December 29, 2020
The patient in question is a young man in his 20s who lives in tiny Elbert County, on the outskirts of Denver.
He has no travel history.
Since the strain was discovered in a rural inland county and in a person with no travel history, it appears the strain has likely been in America for a while.
Colorado reports finding the UK variant #SARSCoV2 virus in a resident who did not travel. In other words, someone who did not bring the case to this country. So, there's more. https://t.co/7dWo4yBa6l — Helen Branswell (@HelenBranswell) December 29, 2020
It was only a matter of time. Epidemiologists believe it is likely that the more contagious UK #COVID19 variant is in several states but Colorado is the first to confirm a case #CovidVaccine pic.twitter.com/0J7dMZIEDn — Gerald Posner (@geraldposner) December 29, 2020
Should this be a cause for panic?
Not really.
It may be more transmissible, but it’s no more dangerous.
The same therapeutics and vaccines are believed to be equally as effective against this variant.
The néw COVID-19 variant that came out of the United Kingdom has now been found in Colorado. I’m not panicked. This strain is more contagious but less severe. There is no cause for panic. The same therapeutics and vaccines can treat this strain as well. Stay calm. — Dr. David Samadi, MD (@drdavidsamadi) December 29, 2020
Still, you can bet that tyrannical governors and mayors will use the new variant as an excuse to tighten their grips against American citizens.
They’ll certainly use it to enforce more draconian lockdowns, mask mandates, and strip the American people of their civil liberties.
That’s why it is more important than ever to stand up to these authoritarians.
If we don’t, they’ll take full advantage of every “emergency” at their disposal.
The mainstream media is already ramping up the fear campaigns to scare the public.
From the Associated Press:
“There is a lot we don’t know about this new COVID-19 variant, but scientists in the United Kingdom are warning the world that it is significantly more contagious. The health and safety of Coloradans is our top priority, and we will closely monitor this case, as well as all COVID-19 indicators, very closely,” Polis said. Polis and state health officials are expected hold a news conference Wednesday. The discovery of the new variant led the CDC to issue new rules on Christmas Day for travelers arriving to the U.S. from the U.K., requiring they show proof of a negative COVID-19 test. Worry has been growing about the variant since the weekend before Christmas, when Britain’s prime minister said a new strain of the coronavirus seemed to spread more easily than earlier ones and was moving rapidly through England. The nation’s first variant case was identified in southeast England. Dozens of countries barred flights from the U.K., and southern England was placed under strict lockdown measures. Scientists say there is reason for concern but the new strains should not cause alarm. Japan announced Monday it would bar entry of all nonresident foreign nationals as a precaution against the new strain. New variants of the coronavirus have been seen almost since the virus was first detected in China nearly a year ago. It is common for viruses to undergo minor changes as they reproduce and move through a population. The slight modifications are how scientists track the spread of a virus from one place to another. But if the virus has significant mutations, one concern is that current vaccines might no longer offer the same protections. Although that’s a possibility to watch for over time with the coronavirus, experts say they don’t believe it will be the case with the latest variant. The U.K. variant, known as B.1.1.7, has also been found in Canada, Italy, India and the United Arab Emirates.
And from the Washington Post:


welovetrump--2020-12-30--Joe Biden Refers to Kamala Harris as “President-Elect” Yet Again

Joe Biden keeps accidentally telling us all the truth .
The man who is essentially Bernie from Weekend at Bernie @ @ @ @ @ himself only a heartbeat away from the presidency .
of course , we all know @ @ @ @ @ elected , Kamala Harris is the one who will really serve in the Oval Office @ @ @ @ @ this to be true , and he just again let it slip at a press @ @ @ @ @ he took the Covid vaccine , Biden said that “ President-elect Harris took hers today.
@ @ @ @ @ the first time Joe Biden has admitted that he ’ s a pawn .

Joe Biden keeps accidentally telling us all the truth.
The man who is essentially Bernie from Weekend at Bernie’s has somehow gotten himself only a heartbeat away from the presidency.
of course, we all know that if Biden is indeed elected, Kamala Harris is the one who will really serve in the Oval Office.
Joe Biden also knows this to be true, and he just again let it slip at a press conference.
After saying that he took the Covid vaccine, Biden said that “President-elect Harris took hers today.”
This isn’t the first time Joe Biden has admitted that he’s a pawn.


welovetrump--2020-12-29--Lockdowns Proven to be Based on TOTAL LIES: Study of 10 Million People from Wuhan Finds No Asymptoma

Lockdowns Proven to be Based on TOTAL LIES: Study of 10 Million People from Wuhan Finds No Asymptomatic Spread of COVID-19

Aren ’ t you tired of these idiotic lockdowns ?
2020 has morphed into 1984 thanks to the authoritarian rule of tyrants who think they can “ protect ” us better than ourselves .
It ’ s maddening and I ’ m sick of it .
Democrats blindly shouting science just because con-man Fauci and creepy Bill Gates of Hell spew their propaganda from their Big Pharma thrones .
Well , we have the science to counter the medical tyranny that has a stranglehold on our country .
The mainstream media won ’ t dare touch it , but a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million residents in the original ground zero of COVID-19 .
And look at what the scientists from mostly China , but also Australia and the United Kingdom found : You mean there was never asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 ?
That ’ s what it looks like folks .
If you remember , asymptomatic spread was the primary reason for the draconian lockdowns in the first place .
They said carrying on with our normal lives would cause a medical catastrophe and kill over 2 million people in America alone .
Asymptomatic spread is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to decide for ourselves how to protect our loved ones .
It ’ s why they systematically destroyed over 100,000 American small businesses .
It was all a lie .
The screening of Wuhan residents was completed in MAY and the study results were released in NOVEMBER .
Yet , their lies continue and too many Americans won ’ t put their foot down to end the authoritarian rule of these tyrants .
Many places in America are still under strict lockdowns and nonsense mask mandates are still in effect .
The science @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lockdowns .
But too many Americans continue to go through the motions .
Many places within the country are rotting minute by minute the longer we wait to demand our freedom back .
If these latest developments don ’ t wake up the science believers , I don ’ t know what will .
Life Site News further elaborated on the narrative-shattering study : WUHAN , China , December 23 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – A study of almost 10 million people in Wuhan , China , found that asymptomatic spread @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , thus undermining the need for lockdowns , which are built on the premise of the virus being unwittingly spread by infectious , asymptomatic people .
Published in November in the scientific journal Nature Communications , the paper was compiled by 19 scientists , mainly from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan , but also from scientific institutions across China as well as in the U.K. and Australia .
It focused on the residents of Wuhan , ground zero for COVID-19 , where 9,899,828 people took part in a screening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which provided clear results as to the possibility of any asymptomatic transmission of the virus .
Asymptomatic transmission has been the underlying justification of lockdowns enforced all across the world .
The most recent guidance from the Centers for Disease Control ( CDC ) still states that the virus “ can be spread by people who do not have symptoms.
” In fact , the CDC claimed that asymptomatic people “ are estimated to account for more than 50 percent of transmissions.
” U.K. Health Secretary Matt Hancock also promoted this message @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spread of COVID-19 led to the U.K. advocating masks and referring to the “ problem of asymptomatic transmission.
” However , the new study in Nature Communications , titled “ Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly 10 million residents of Wuhan , China , ” debunked the concept of asymptomatic transmission .
It stated that out of the nearly 10 million people in the study , “ 300 asymptomatic cases ” were found .
Contact tracing was then carried out and of those 300 , no cases of COVID-19 were detected in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced , and they all tested negative for the COVID-19.
” Both the asymptomatic patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for two weeks , and after the fortnight , the results remained the same .
“ None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period.
” Further evidence showed that “ virus cultures ” in the positive and repositive asymptomatic cases were all negative , “ indicating no ‘ viable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this study.
” Ages of those found to be asymptomatic ranged between 10 and 89 , with the asymptomatic positive rate being “ lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below ” and highest rate found among people older than 60 .
The study also made the realization that due to a weakening of the virus itself , “ newly infected persons were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower viral load than earlier infected cases.
” These results are not without precedent .
In June , Dr. Maria Van @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Organization ’ s ( WHO ) emerging diseases and zoonosis unit , shed doubt upon asymptomatic transmission .
Speaking at a press conference , Van Kerkhove explained , “ From the data we have , it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.
” She then repeated the words “ It ’ s very rare , ” but despite her word choice of “ rare , ” Van Kerkhove could not point to a single case of asymptomatic transmission , noting that numerous reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Her comments went against the predominant narrative justifying lockdowns , and at the time the American Institute for Economic Research ( AIER ) highlighted that “ she undermined the last bit of rationale there could be for lockdowns , mandated masks , social distancing regulation , and the entire apparatus of compulsion and coercion under which we ’ ve lived for three months.
” Swift to act , the WHO performed a U-turn , and the next day Van Kerkhove then declared that asymptomatic transmission was a “ really complex question … @ @ @ @ @ @ @ answer yet.
” “ I think that that ’ s misunderstanding to state that asymptomatic transmission globally is very rare .
I was referring to a small subset of studies , ” she added .
However , the new Wuhan study seems to present solid , scientific evidence that asymptomatic transmission is not just rare but nonexistent .
Given that it found “ no evidence that the identified asymptomatic positive cases were infectious , ” the study raises important questions about lockdowns .
Commenting on the study , The Conservative Tree House noted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regulations , mask wearing requirements and social distancing rules/decrees are based on a complete fallacy of false assumptions.
” The evidence presented in the study shows that “ ‘ very rare ’ actually means ‘ never ’ asymptomatic spread just doesn ’ t happen – EVER.
” Such a large scientific study of 10 million people should not be overlooked , Jeffrey Tucker argued in the AIER , as it should be “ huge news , ” paving the way “ to open up everything immediately.
” Yet media reports have been virtually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact that Tucker explained : “ The lockdown lobby ignores whatever contradicts their narrative , preferring unverified anecdotes over an actual scientific study of 10 million residents in what was the world ’ s first major hotspot for the disease we are trying to manage.
” The recent findings should enable society to reopen once more , according to the AIER .
Without asymptomatic transmission , “ the whole basis for post-curve-flattening lockdowns , ” life should resume and “ we could take comfort in our normal intuition that healthy people can get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ others.
” NATIONAL POLL : Would You Like To See `` The Squad '' Voted Out of Office ?
And I ’ m talking by the millions !
Believe me , it ’ s the only way we will return to sanity .
Share this message to wake up the sleeping masses !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
1,460 views
Aren’t you tired of these idiotic lockdowns?
2020 has morphed into 1984 thanks to the authoritarian rule of tyrants who think they can “protect” us better than ourselves.
It’s maddening and I’m sick of it.
Democrats blindly shouting science just because con-man Fauci and creepy Bill Gates of Hell spew their propaganda from their Big Pharma thrones.
Well, we have the science to counter the medical tyranny that has a stranglehold on our country.
The mainstream media won’t dare touch it, but a comprehensive study from Wuhan observed roughly 10 million residents in the original ground zero of COVID-19.
And look at what the scientists from mostly China, but also Australia and the United Kingdom found:
A study of 10 million in Wuhan found no spread of Covid from people having no symptoms; why continue the lockdowns ? Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn’t occur at all, study of 10 million finds | News | LifeSite https://t.co/rC6ZhShHSg — JESUSisComingBack🕚 (@GoodShepherd316) December 28, 2020
https://twitter.com/NatyLiy/status/1343286942473994240
While this article says they don't know if the virus can be spread by asymptomatic carriers… "A city-wide prevalence study of almost 10 million people in Wuhan found no evidence of asymptomatic transmission." There is NO evidence of asymptomatic spread. https://t.co/GF7tIXFuxt — Naomi (@girly_GRRRL) December 29, 2020
Another study showing the same thing: asymptomatic spread is exceedingly rare. "There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases." STAY HOME WHEN SICK! (That's how COVID spreads.)https://t.co/ZQwEdQ4AuT https://t.co/QpFUypj7tX — U.S. Army Garrison Daegu (@USAGDaegu) December 28, 2020
Wait a minute?
You mean there was never asymptomatic spread of COVID-19?
Even in Wuhan, China?
That’s what it looks like folks.
If you remember, asymptomatic spread was the primary reason for the draconian lockdowns in the first place.
They said carrying on with our normal lives would cause a medical catastrophe and kill over 2 million people in America alone.
Asymptomatic spread is why they stole our freedom and ability to decide for ourselves how to protect our loved ones.
It’s why they systematically destroyed over 100,000 American small businesses.
More than 100,000 small businesses have closed forever b/c of the pandemic & lockdowns. They need more than a relief bill. They need the FREEDOM to open. https://t.co/3hdK4KUBV5 — Stand For America (@standamericanow) December 21, 2020
It was all a lie.
Are you listening?
Asymptomatic spread was all a LIE!
Lockdowns were based on a lie.
The screening of Wuhan residents was completed in MAY and the study results were released in NOVEMBER.
Yet, their lies continue and too many Americans won’t put their foot down to end the authoritarian rule of these tyrants.
Many places in America are still under strict lockdowns and nonsense mask mandates are still in effect.
BREAKING! Do mask mandates work? Our analysis below.
We looked at cases on days where mask mandates were in place vs when they were not. We calculated the cases per day adjusted for population and: WITH MASK MANDATE:
27 cases per day per 100K people NO MASK MADATE
17 cases 1/ pic.twitter.com/IALibl5nmg — Justin Hart (@justin_hart) December 20, 2020
The science agrees with freedom of choice and ending the lockdowns.
But too many Americans continue to go through the motions.
Many places within the country are rotting minute by minute the longer we wait to demand our freedom back.
If these latest developments don’t wake up the science believers, I don’t know what will.
Life Site News further elaborated on the narrative-shattering study:
WUHAN, China, December 23, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A study of almost 10 million people in Wuhan, China, found that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 did not occur at all, thus undermining the need for lockdowns, which are built on the premise of the virus being unwittingly spread by infectious, asymptomatic people. Published in November in the scientific journal Nature Communications, the paper was compiled by 19 scientists, mainly from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, but also from scientific institutions across China as well as in the U.K. and Australia. It focused on the residents of Wuhan, ground zero for COVID-19, where 9,899,828 people took part in a screening program between May 14 and June 1, which provided clear results as to the possibility of any asymptomatic transmission of the virus. Asymptomatic transmission has been the underlying justification of lockdowns enforced all across the world. The most recent guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) still states that the virus “can be spread by people who do not have symptoms.” In fact, the CDC claimed that asymptomatic people “are estimated to account for more than 50 percent of transmissions.” U.K. Health Secretary Matt Hancock also promoted this message, explaining that the concept of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 led to the U.K. advocating masks and referring to the “problem of asymptomatic transmission.” However, the new study in Nature Communications, titled “Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly 10 million residents of Wuhan, China,” debunked the concept of asymptomatic transmission. It stated that out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, “300 asymptomatic cases” were found. Contact tracing was then carried out and of those 300, no cases of COVID-19 were detected in any of them. “A total of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19.” Both the asymptomatic patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for two weeks, and after the fortnight, the results remained the same. “None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period.” Further evidence showed that “virus cultures” in the positive and repositive asymptomatic cases were all negative, “indicating no ‘viable virus’ in positive cases detected in this study.” Ages of those found to be asymptomatic ranged between 10 and 89, with the asymptomatic positive rate being “lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below” and highest rate found among people older than 60. The study also made the realization that due to a weakening of the virus itself, “newly infected persons were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower viral load than earlier infected cases.” These results are not without precedent. In June, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, shed doubt upon asymptomatic transmission. Speaking at a press conference, Van Kerkhove explained, “From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.” She then repeated the words “It’s very rare,” but despite her word choice of “rare,” Van Kerkhove could not point to a single case of asymptomatic transmission, noting that numerous reports “were not finding secondary transmission onward.” Her comments went against the predominant narrative justifying lockdowns, and at the time the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) highlighted that “she undermined the last bit of rationale there could be for lockdowns, mandated masks, social distancing regulation, and the entire apparatus of compulsion and coercion under which we’ve lived for three months.” Swift to act, the WHO performed a U-turn, and the next day Van Kerkhove then declared that asymptomatic transmission was a “really complex question … We don’t actually have that answer yet.” “I think that that’s misunderstanding to state that asymptomatic transmission globally is very rare. I was referring to a small subset of studies,” she added. However, the new Wuhan study seems to present solid, scientific evidence that asymptomatic transmission is not just rare but nonexistent. Given that it found “no evidence that the identified asymptomatic positive cases were infectious,” the study raises important questions about lockdowns. Commenting on the study, The Conservative Tree House noted that “all of the current lockdown regulations, mask wearing requirements and social distancing rules/decrees are based on a complete fallacy of false assumptions.” The evidence presented in the study shows that “‘very rare’ actually means ‘never’ asymptomatic spread just doesn’t happen – EVER.” NATIONAL POLL: Will You Vote For Trump A THIRD Time? Such a large scientific study of 10 million people should not be overlooked, Jeffrey Tucker argued in the AIER, as it should be “huge news,” paving the way “to open up everything immediately.” Yet media reports have been virtually nonexistent and “ignored,” a fact that Tucker explained: “The lockdown lobby ignores whatever contradicts their narrative, preferring unverified anecdotes over an actual scientific study of 10 million residents in what was the world’s first major hotspot for the disease we are trying to manage.” The recent findings should enable society to reopen once more, according to the AIER. Without asymptomatic transmission, “the whole basis for post-curve-flattening lockdowns,” life should resume and “we could take comfort in our normal intuition that healthy people can get out and about with no risk to others.”
It’s long past time for mass civil disobedience.
And I’m talking by the millions!
Believe me, it’s the only way we will return to sanity.
Share this message to wake up the sleeping masses!


welovetrump--2020-12-29--Step Aside Obama, Trump Has Been Named “The Most Admired Man of 2020”

Well , this is a fun turn of events .
According to a new Gallup poll , President Donald Trump @ @ @ @ @ of 2020 .
In doing so , President Trump just ended Barack Obama ’ s @ @ @ @ @ .
Last year , the president found himself in a tie with Obama for the @ @ @ @ @ despite Obama ’ s massive ego , his popularity is beginning to fade .
Somehow @ @ @ @ @ Michelle is still the most admired woman .
It must be very awkward for Barack @ @ @ @ @ is the one sharing that title with Michelle .

Well, this is a fun turn of events.
According to a new Gallup poll, President Donald Trump is the most admired man of 2020.
In doing so, President Trump just ended Barack Obama’s 12-year run with the title.
Last year, the president found himself in a tie with Obama for the title.
It seems that despite Obama’s massive ego, his popularity is beginning to fade.
Somehow, Obama’s wife Michelle is still the most admired woman.
It must be very awkward for Barack Obama now that President Trump is the one sharing that title with Michelle.


welovetrump--2020-12-29--The List of Possible Side Effects To The COVID Vaccine Should Terrify You!

Before you get the COVID vaccine….IF you are planning on getting the COVID vaccine , you might want to read this .
No , this is not hype .
No , this is not scare tactics .
This is good old fashioned reporting .
You know , the kind they used to do maybe 50-60 years ago , where you actually go out and investigate and then report what you find ?
I know that must sound very foreign to anyone who currently works in a newsroom where they don ’ t investigate so much as they just read the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ owners .
But that ’ s not what we do here at WeLoveTrump .
And then we share it with you and we let YOU decide .
Kind of like how Fox News used to be before they sold out .
Before we get to the list of side effects , let ’ s start with a couple stories and videos .
Because stories and videos can convey something much better than words sometimes .
So let ’ s start with the story you ’ ve probably seen by now .
This brave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID vaccine right away…..and then this happened : Please understand I am not making light .
I feel so bad for these people !
But do not let this happen to you or your family !
By all accounts the woman was in perfect health before getting this toxic shot .
And then there ’ s this woman who now has a paralyzed bells palsy face : Now let ’ s get right to it .
So what are the published list of side effects ?
Here you go : And before you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ posting on Twitter , how can we trust that ?
What she posted came directly from the FDA website that you can visit for yourself here : https : //www.fda.gov/media/143557/download And let me make it even easier for you .
I went to that link myself and took a screenshot of the exact page with the FDA link showing in the browser .
Here you go : I like how “ Death ” is listed .
I think I might just take my chance with the sniffles .
Even the people who are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ online about the serious risk of anaphylactic shock : And I love how this woman admits it ’ s a big risk but she ’ s ok with it because everyone who has went into anaphylactic shock was able to be treated in time before they died .
Oh , and then there ’ s this…..according to CNBC , if you get a serious injury or die , you have NO REMEDY because the vaccine makers are immune ( no pun intended ) from lawsuits : If you experience severe side effects after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CNBC there is basically no one to blame in a U.S. court of law .
The federal government has granted companies like Pfizer and Moderna immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their vaccines .
“ It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed , ” said Rogge Dunn , a Dallas labor and employment attorney .
“ Pharmaceutical companies typically aren ’ t offered much liability protection under the law.
“ You also can ’ t sue the Food and Drug Administration for authorizing a vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hold your employer accountable if they mandate inoculation as a condition of employment .
Congress created a fund specifically to help cover lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses for people who have been irreparably harmed by a “ covered countermeasure , ” such as a vaccine .
But it is difficult to use and rarely pays .
Attorneys say it has compensated less than 6 % of the claims filed in the last decade .
In February , Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act @ @ @ @ @ @ @ secretary to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies , such as vaccines and treatments , unless there ’ s “ willful misconduct ” by the company .
The protection lasts until 2024 .
That means that for the next four years , these companies “ can not be sued for money damages in court ” over injuries related to the administration or use of products to treat or protect against Covid .
Dunn thinks a big reason for the unprecedented protection has to do with the expedited timeline @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ We want you to develop this four or five times faster than you normally do , ’ most likely the manufacturers said to the government , ‘ We want you , the government , to protect us from multimillion-dollar lawsuits , ’ ” said Dunn .
It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed .
… Pharmaceutical companies typically aren ’ t offered much liability protection under the law .
The quickest vaccine ever developed was for mumps .
It took four years and was licensed in 1967 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ developed and cleared for emergency use in eight months — a fact that has fueled public mistrust of the coronavirus inoculation in the U.S .
Roughly 4 in 10 Americans say they would “ definitely ” or “ probably ” not get vaccinated , according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center .
While this is lower than it was two months ago , it still points to a huge trust gap .
But drugmakers like Pfizer continue to reassure the public no shortcuts were taken .
“ This is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” CEO Dr. Albert Bourla said in an interview with CNBC ’ s “ Squawk Box ” on Monday .
“ This is a vaccine that is getting approved by all authorities in the world .
That should say something.
” The legal immunity granted to pharmaceutical companies doesn ’ t just guard them against lawsuits .
Dunn said it helps lower the cost of the immunizations .
“ The government doesn ’ t want people suing the companies making the Covid vaccine .
Because then , the manufacturers would probably charge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ per dose , ” Dunn explained .
Pfizer and Moderna did not return CNBC ’ s request for comment on their legal protections .
Remember , vaccine manufacturers aren ’ t the ones approving their product for mass distribution .
That is the job of the FDA .
Which begs the question , can you sue the U.S. government if you have an extraordinarily bad reaction to a vaccine ?
“ You can ’ t sue the FDA for approving or disapproving a drug , ” said Dorit Reiss , a professor at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Law .
“ That ’ s part of its sovereign immunity.
” Ok , now if you ’ re easily offended don ’ t watch this last one .
NATIONAL POLL : Is CNN The Enemy Of The People ?
Don ’ t email me saying you were offended by this .
Since this article has been very serious , I thought we should end with this one and all have a little laugh ( even though the planned-demic and vaccine are no laughing matter ) :

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
27,025 views
Before you get the COVID vaccine….IF you are planning on getting the COVID vaccine, you might want to read this.
No, this is not hype.
No, this is not scare tactics.
This is good old fashioned reporting.
You know, the kind they used to do maybe 50-60 years ago, where you actually go out and investigate and then report what you find?
I know that must sound very foreign to anyone who currently works in a newsroom where they don’t investigate so much as they just read the talking points that come in from their owners.
But that’s not what we do here at WeLoveTrump.
We investigate.
And then we share it with you and we let YOU decide.
We report, you decide.
Kind of like how Fox News used to be before they sold out.
So let’s dig right in….
Before we get to the list of side effects, let’s start with a couple stories and videos.
Because stories and videos can convey something much better than words sometimes.
So let’s start with the story you’ve probably seen by now.
This brave front-line nurse who wanted to take the COVID vaccine right away…..and then this happened:
https://twitter.com/vuxle/status/1339765938225172482?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1339765938225172482%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwelovetrump.com%2F2020%2F12%2F19%2Fa-nurse-faints-during-a-live-interview-after-taking-covid-vaccine%2F
Please understand I am not making light.
I feel so bad for these people!
But do not let this happen to you or your family!
By all accounts the woman was in perfect health before getting this toxic shot.
And then there’s this woman who now has a paralyzed bells palsy face:
Now let’s get right to it.
So what are the published list of side effects?
Here you go:
A “working list” of side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, according to the FDA, include: -death
-brain swelling
-stroke
-convulsions See for yourself before it’s taken down: https://t.co/AVg20RoU62 pic.twitter.com/HFEms42EuM — Sara Gonzales (@SaraGonzalesTX) December 5, 2020
And before you say that’s just some woman posting on Twitter, how can we trust that?
No it’s not.
What she posted came directly from the FDA website that you can visit for yourself here: https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
And let me make it even easier for you.
I went to that link myself and took a screenshot of the exact page with the FDA link showing in the browser.
Here you go:
That’s quite the list!
I like how “Death” is listed.
Yeah, that’s one hell of a side effect!
I think I might just take my chance with the sniffles.
Even the people who are in favor of the vaccine are posting online about the serious risk of anaphylactic shock:
Getting the Covid vaccine is a good thing, I am all for it, just be careful to have a medical professional around when you get the injection, in case you are one of the very few who get a serious reaction to it. #Anaphalaxis pic.twitter.com/QmWQGf9DuA — Robin Pierce (@Wildmoonsister) December 17, 2020
And I love how this woman admits it’s a big risk but she’s ok with it because everyone who has went into anaphylactic shock was able to be treated in time before they died.
She thinks.
Wow:
The incidence of anaphalaxis with this vaccine is concerning. However all of the people who had severe reactions were able to be treated immediately with adrenaline shots and kept in hospital until they recovered. I'll be consulting my doctor about it. https://t.co/at8EIg0Y8F — Veronika Sain (@VeronikaSain) December 23, 2020
Oh, and then there’s this…..according to CNBC, if you get a serious injury or die, you have NO REMEDY because the vaccine makers are immune (no pun intended) from lawsuits:
If you experience severe side effects after getting a Covid vaccine, lawyers tell CNBC there is basically no one to blame in a U.S. court of law. The federal government has granted companies like Pfizer and Moderna immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their vaccines. “It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed,” said Rogge Dunn, a Dallas labor and employment attorney. “Pharmaceutical companies typically aren’t offered much liability protection under the law.“ You also can’t sue the Food and Drug Administration for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use, nor can you hold your employer accountable if they mandate inoculation as a condition of employment. Congress created a fund specifically to help cover lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses for people who have been irreparably harmed by a “covered countermeasure,” such as a vaccine. But it is difficult to use and rarely pays. Attorneys say it has compensated less than 6% of the claims filed in the last decade. Immune to lawsuits In February, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act. The 2005 law empowers the HHS secretary to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies, such as vaccines and treatments, unless there’s “willful misconduct” by the company. The protection lasts until 2024. That means that for the next four years, these companies “cannot be sued for money damages in court” over injuries related to the administration or use of products to treat or protect against Covid. HHS declined CNBC’s request for an interview. Dunn thinks a big reason for the unprecedented protection has to do with the expedited timeline. “When the government said, ‘We want you to develop this four or five times faster than you normally do,’ most likely the manufacturers said to the government, ‘We want you, the government, to protect us from multimillion-dollar lawsuits,’” said Dunn. It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed. … Pharmaceutical companies typically aren’t offered much liability protection under the law. The quickest vaccine ever developed was for mumps. It took four years and was licensed in 1967. Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine was developed and cleared for emergency use in eight months — a fact that has fueled public mistrust of the coronavirus inoculation in the U.S. Roughly 4 in 10 Americans say they would “definitely” or “probably” not get vaccinated, according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center. While this is lower than it was two months ago, it still points to a huge trust gap. But drugmakers like Pfizer continue to reassure the public no shortcuts were taken. “This is a vaccine that was developed without cutting corners,” CEO Dr. Albert Bourla said in an interview with CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Monday. “This is a vaccine that is getting approved by all authorities in the world. That should say something.” The legal immunity granted to pharmaceutical companies doesn’t just guard them against lawsuits. Dunn said it helps lower the cost of the immunizations. “The government doesn’t want people suing the companies making the Covid vaccine. Because then, the manufacturers would probably charge the government a higher price per person per dose,” Dunn explained. Pfizer and Moderna did not return CNBC’s request for comment on their legal protections. Is anyone liable? Remember, vaccine manufacturers aren’t the ones approving their product for mass distribution. That is the job of the FDA. Which begs the question, can you sue the U.S. government if you have an extraordinarily bad reaction to a vaccine? Again, the answer is no. “You can’t sue the FDA for approving or disapproving a drug,” said Dorit Reiss, a professor at the University of California Hastings College of Law. “That’s part of its sovereign immunity.”
Covid vaccine: You can't sue Pfizer or Moderna over side effects https://t.co/w2EF9vYA72 pic.twitter.com/dIbgANnc0g — Barb Loe, NVIC (@NVICLoeDown) December 22, 2020
MSM vaccine propaganda continues with no mention of the CDC figure of 2.8% who suffer serious debilitating side effects, or that 99.7% of people can fight off SARS-Cov-2 with their own immune system. I will not be taking an experimental Covid vaccine and I am not recommending it. — David Kurten (@davidkurten) December 28, 2020
More:
"I'm not getting the COVID vaccine, I don't trust it."
Birth control side effects and risks: pic.twitter.com/dBds2Pb9Zm — K.🧚🏻♀ (@quelokait) December 22, 2020
Ok, now if you’re easily offended don’t watch this last one.
You’ve been warned.
Don’t email me saying you were offended by this.
Since this article has been very serious, I thought we should end with this one and all have a little laugh (even though the planned-demic and vaccine are no laughing matter):


welovetrump--2020-12-29--Here’s What The Q Anon Movement Stands For….What Is Wrong With This?

The real question is , what are the major news networks and the democrats really afraid of ?
If QAnon is just a silly conspiracy group , why are they so desperate to silence the group ?
Why does anything QAnon related get people banned from social media , while wishing death upon the president after his brother passes away trends ?
And if you want even more , watch this .
Now that you know the TRUTH , let ’ s take a look at what the MSM is trying to tell you .
Does any of this remotely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Ask yourself why they are lying .
And also ask yourself like President Trump did , why would you be against what Q stands for ?
Unless…..well , I ’ ll let you fill in the answer to that question .
I think you know it .
And it ’ s very dark and ugly .
A dark and ugly reality of the world ’ s elites .
Here ’ s what CBS News wants you to beLIEve : What started as a fringe movement among President Trump ’ s supporters , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ internet , has taken a mainstream turn .
The QAnon conspiracy theory started on 4chan , the bulletin board known for creating and spreading memes , but has moved to larger social media platforms .
Facebook has taken action against QAnon groups and pages , while Twitter removed several thousand QAnon-linked accounts in 2020 .
The FBI has warned that fringe conspiracy theories like QAnon pose a growing domestic terrorism threat .
What is the QAnon conspiracy theory ?
What do its followers believe ?
Those questions have become more difficult to answer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inception in 2017 .
QAnon purports that America is run by a cabal of pedophiles and Satan-worshippers who run a global child sex-trafficking operation and that President Trump is the only person who can stop them .
The information supposedly comes from a high-ranking government official who posts cryptic clues on 4chan and the even more unfettered site 8chan under the name “ Q.
” That ’ s the central gist of the theory .
The rest is open to some degree of interpretation , which is necessary because Q ’ s posts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ YouTube videos created by QAnon believers help fill in the gaps and create a storyline that ’ s more-or-less comprehensible .
QAnon exists as a kind of parallel history , in which a “ deep state ” took over decades ago .
An all-encompassing theory of the world , it appears to tie together and explain everything from “ Pizzagate ” to ISIS to the prevalence of mass shootings and the JFK assassination .
It claims the military , supposedly eager to see the deep state overthrown , recruited President Trump to run @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which controls the media , quickly tried to smear him through “ fake news ” and unfounded allegations of collusion with Russia .
It goes on to insist that despite the deep state ’ s best efforts , however , President Trump is winning , and that Q is releasing sanctioned leaks to the public in order to galvanize them ahead of “ The Storm , ” which is the moment when the deep state ’ s leaders are arrested and sent to Guantanamo Bay .
QAnon believers have called this process @ @ @ @ @ @ @ takes its name from President Trump ’ s enigmatic comment from October 2018 about “ the calm before the storm.
” Q began posting soon after and said that the storm Mr. Trump referenced is a coming series of mass arrests that would end the deep state forever .
In QAnon lore , President Trump was secretly working with special counsel Robert Mueller to bring the deep state down , and the storm is a kind of Judgment Day in which the evildoers are punished and the faithful are redeemed .
Q has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the very near future and has even said certain people would be arrested at certain dates .
When those dates come and go without any arrests , Q says that they needed to be delayed for one reason or another , but that President Trump still has the situation well in hand .
Q ’ s posts tend to be either vague or totally incomprehensible , but QAnon believers are more than happy to try and decipher them .
Last year , for example , Q posted a photo of an unnamed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reasoning behind the post , QAnon adherents tried to “ prove ” that the photo must have been taken on Air Force One and thus that Q was traveling with the president .
The Q posts are known to the faithful as “ breadcrumbs.
” The people who then try to figure out what they mean are called “ bakers.
” According to The Daily Beast ’ s Will Sommer , QAnon believers also spend a lot of time trying to figure out who in the government is a “ white hat ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ black hat ” in league with the deep state .
Their rallying cry is “ where we go one , we go all , ” a line from the 1996 Jeff Bridges sailing adventure “ White Squall ” that they misattribute to President Kennedy .
The phrase is frequently abbreviated to “ WWG1WGA , ” which Roseanne Barr — one of several celebrity QAnon supporters — tweeted in June 2018 .
Former Red Sox pitcher and current right-wing radio host Curt Schilling has also promoted QAnon online .
The name refers to Q-level @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who ’ s behind the posts is anybody ’ s guess .
According to Sommer , the QAnon faithful sometimes point to former national security adviser Michael Flynn and White House aide Dan Scavino as possibilities .
Others believe it ’ s Mr. Trump himself .
Another theory is that John F. Kennedy Jr. faked his death and now posts on 8chan as QAnon .
On November 3 , Election Day , 8chan ( now 8kun ) administrator Ron Watkins resigned from his post .
Q did not post for the next week @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In November 2017 , a small-time YouTube video creator and two moderators of the 4chan website , one of the most extreme message boards on the internet , banded together and plucked out of obscurity an anonymous and cryptic post from the many conspiracy theories that populated the website ’ s message board .
Over the next several months , they would create videos , a Reddit community , a business and an entire mythology based off the 4chan posts of “ Q , ” the pseudonym of a person claiming to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they espoused would become Qanon , and it would eventually make its way from those message boards to national media stories and the rallies of President Donald Trump .
Now , the people behind that effort are at the center of a fractious debate among conspiracy enthusiasts , some of whom believe the three people who first popularized the Qanon theory are promoting it in order to make a living .
Others suggest that these original followers actually wrote Q ’ s mysterious posts .
While the identity of the original author or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unknown , the history of the conspiracy theory ’ s spread is well-documented — through YouTube videos , social media posts , Reddit archives , and public records reviewed by NBC News .
NBC News has found that the theory can be traced back to three people who sparked some of the first conversation about Qanon and , in doing so , attracted followers who they then asked to help fund Qanon “ research.
” Qanon is a convoluted conspiracy theory with no apparent foundation in reality .
The heart of it asserts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Q ” has taken to the fringe internet message boards of 4chan and 8chan to leak intelligence about Trump ’ s top-secret war with a cabal of criminals run by politicians like Hillary Clinton and the Hollywood elite .
There is no evidence for these claims .
In addition to peeking into the mainstream , the theory has been increasingly linked to real-world violence .
In recent months , Qanon followers have allegedly been involved in a foiled presidential assassination plot , a devastating California wildfire , and an armed standoff with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Part of the Qanon appeal lies in its game-like quality .
Followers wait for clues left by “ Q ” on the message board .
When the clues appear , believers dissect the riddle-like posts alongside Trump ’ s speeches and tweets and news articles in an effort to validate the main narrative that Trump is winning a war against evil .
There are now dozens of commentators who dissect “ Q ” posts — on message boards , in YouTube videos and on their personal pages — but the theory was first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worked together to stir discussion of the “ Q ” posts , eventually pushing the theory on to bigger platforms and gaining followers — a strategy that proved to be the key to Qanon ’ s spread and the originators ’ financial gain .
Before Q , there was a wide variety of “ anon ” 4chan posters all claiming to have special government access .
In 2016 , there was FBIAnon , a self-described “ high-level analyst and strategist ” offering intel about the 2016 investigation into the Clinton Foundation .
Then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Level Insider , who posted about various dubious conspiracies in riddles , including one that claimed Princess Diana had been killed because she found out about 9/11 “ beforehand ” and had “ tried to stop it.
” Then “ CIAAnon ” and “ CIA Intern ” took to the boards in early 2017 , and last August one called WH Insider Anon offered a supposed preview that something that was “ going to go down ” regarding the DNC and leaks .
Qanon was just another unremarkable part of the “ anon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two moderators of the 4chan board where Q posted predictions , who went by the usernames Pamphlet Anon and BaruchtheScribe , reached out to Tracy Diaz , according to Diaz ’ s blogs and YouTube videos .
BaruchtheScribe , in reality a self-identified web programmer from South Africa named Paul Furber , confirmed that account to NBC News .
“ A bunch of us decided that the message needed to go wider so we contacted Youtubers who had been commenting on the Q drops , ” Furber said in an email .
Diaz @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hosted a talk show on the fringe right-wing network Liberty Movement Radio , had found moderate popularity with a couple of thousand views for her YouTube videos analyzing WikiLeaks releases and discussing the “ pizzagate ” conspiracy , a baseless theory that alleged a child sex ring was being run out of a Washington pizza shop .
As Diaz tells it in a blog post detailing her role in the early days of Qanon , she banded together with the two moderators .
Their goal , according to Diaz , was to build @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mean bigger followings for them as well .
On Nov. 3 , 2017 , just six days after the first 4chan post from “ Q , ” Diaz posted a video entitled “ /POL/- Q Clearance Anon – Is it # happening ?
?
?
” in which she introduced the conspiracy theory to her audience .
“ I do not typically do videos like this , ” she said , but citing Q ’ s “ very specific and kind of eerie ” posts , Diaz explained that she would be covering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ case this stuff turns out to be legit because honestly it kind of seems legit .
”

The real question is, what are the major news networks and the democrats really afraid of?
If QAnon is just a silly conspiracy group, why are they so desperate to silence the group?
Why does anything QAnon related get people banned from social media, while wishing death upon the president after his brother passes away trends?
And if you want even more, watch this.
THIS….is Q:
https://rumble.com/embed/v8epol/?pub=2oodx
Now that you know the TRUTH, let’s take a look at what the MSM is trying to tell you.
Does any of this remotely line up with what you just learned?
Ask yourself why they are lying.
And also ask yourself like President Trump did, why would you be against what Q stands for?
Unless…..well, I’ll let you fill in the answer to that question. I think you know it. And it’s very dark and ugly. A dark and ugly reality of the world’s elites.
Here’s what CBS News wants you to beLIEve:
What started as a fringe movement among President Trump’s supporters, confined to the shadier corners of the internet, has taken a mainstream turn. The QAnon conspiracy theory started on 4chan, the bulletin board known for creating and spreading memes, but has moved to larger social media platforms. Facebook has taken action against QAnon groups and pages, while Twitter removed several thousand QAnon-linked accounts in 2020. The FBI has warned that fringe conspiracy theories like QAnon pose a growing domestic terrorism threat. What is the QAnon conspiracy theory? What do its followers believe? Those questions have become more difficult to answer as the movement has expanded since its inception in 2017. The story of Q QAnon purports that America is run by a cabal of pedophiles and Satan-worshippers who run a global child sex-trafficking operation and that President Trump is the only person who can stop them. The information supposedly comes from a high-ranking government official who posts cryptic clues on 4chan and the even more unfettered site 8chan under the name “Q.” That’s the central gist of the theory. The rest is open to some degree of interpretation, which is necessary because Q’s posts tend to read like riddles. But YouTube videos created by QAnon believers help fill in the gaps and create a storyline that’s more-or-less comprehensible. QAnon exists as a kind of parallel history, in which a “deep state” took over decades ago. An all-encompassing theory of the world, it appears to tie together and explain everything from “Pizzagate” to ISIS to the prevalence of mass shootings and the JFK assassination. It claims the military, supposedly eager to see the deep state overthrown, recruited President Trump to run for president. But the deep state, which controls the media, quickly tried to smear him through “fake news” and unfounded allegations of collusion with Russia. It goes on to insist that despite the deep state’s best efforts, however, President Trump is winning, and that Q is releasing sanctioned leaks to the public in order to galvanize them ahead of “The Storm,” which is the moment when the deep state’s leaders are arrested and sent to Guantanamo Bay. QAnon believers have called this process “The Great Awakening.” Enter “the storm” The storm takes its name from President Trump’s enigmatic comment from October 2018 about “the calm before the storm.” Q began posting soon after and said that the storm Mr. Trump referenced is a coming series of mass arrests that would end the deep state forever. In QAnon lore, President Trump was secretly working with special counsel Robert Mueller to bring the deep state down, and the storm is a kind of Judgment Day in which the evildoers are punished and the faithful are redeemed. Q has repeatedly suggested that the storm would hit in the very near future and has even said certain people would be arrested at certain dates. When those dates come and go without any arrests, Q says that they needed to be delayed for one reason or another, but that President Trump still has the situation well in hand. Bakers and breadcrumbs Q’s posts tend to be either vague or totally incomprehensible, but QAnon believers are more than happy to try and decipher them. Last year, for example, Q posted a photo of an unnamed island chain. Eager to divine the reasoning behind the post, QAnon adherents tried to “prove” that the photo must have been taken on Air Force One and thus that Q was traveling with the president. The Q posts are known to the faithful as “breadcrumbs.” The people who then try to figure out what they mean are called “bakers.” According to The Daily Beast’s Will Sommer, QAnon believers also spend a lot of time trying to figure out who in the government is a “white hat” Trump supporter and who is a “black hat” in league with the deep state. Their rallying cry is “where we go one, we go all,” a line from the 1996 Jeff Bridges sailing adventure “White Squall” that they misattribute to President Kennedy. The phrase is frequently abbreviated to “WWG1WGA,” which Roseanne Barr — one of several celebrity QAnon supporters — tweeted in June 2018. Former Red Sox pitcher and current right-wing radio host Curt Schilling has also promoted QAnon online. Q’s identity The name refers to Q-level clearance at the Energy Department. But who’s behind the posts is anybody’s guess. According to Sommer, the QAnon faithful sometimes point to former national security adviser Michael Flynn and White House aide Dan Scavino as possibilities. Others believe it’s Mr. Trump himself. Another theory is that John F. Kennedy Jr. faked his death and now posts on 8chan as QAnon. On November 3, Election Day, 8chan (now 8kun) administrator Ron Watkins resigned from his post. Q did not post for the next week, raising questions about a connection.
And the NBC News propaganda:


welovetrump--2020-12-29--9/11 Explained In 5 Minutes….Do You BeLIEve This?

Last night in my Newsletter , I mentioned that I don ’ t really know what is going with the explosion in Nashville , but I know one thing : I don ’ t really trust the official FBI story .
I don ’ t trust that they knew exactly who did it within what , 24-48 hours ?
They had already matched DNA , determined he died in the explosion , and pretty much figured out the whole rest of the story in 24-48 hours ?
And then I said in the Newsletter that after 9/11 and the Las @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t really buy ANYTHING that the FBI puts out there .
The same FBI that has spent the last 4 years trying everything they can to frame President Trump and Michael Flynn ( and failing at it , by the way ) .
A couple people emailed me and asked what I meant when I said I didn ’ t trust the official 9/11 story .
I really appreciate the question .
And the best way for me to explain it to you is to just show you this video .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it moves so fast you might need to watch it 3 or 4 times to let everything sink in .
It ’ s one of my favorite videos .
The video doesn ’ t tell you what to think or what conclusions to draw , it just lists the “ official story ” that the media has pushed and pulls it all together so you can listen to exactly what they want you to believe .
And as you listen , if you ’ re like me eventually you reach a point where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stupid do they think we are ?
” And that ’ s the point when you realize you ’ ve likely been fed a huge pile of horse shit with the “ official FBI story.
” But that ’ s just my conclusion , you can judge for yourself .
And thanks to a reader suggestion , I am now putting the Rumble video first ( above ) and the YouScared video second as a “ backup ” source .
I will probably start dropping the YouTube source altogether soon .
NATIONAL POLL @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Holdovers ?
YES or NO But for now I ’ d rather give you two versions to make sure you see it .
So here is YT : I ’ d love to know what you think .
Do you buy what they ’ re trying to sell you ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
53,108 views
Last night in my Newsletter, I mentioned that I don’t really know what is going with the explosion in Nashville, but I know one thing: I don’t really trust the official FBI story.
I don’t trust that they knew exactly who did it within what, 24-48 hours?
They had already matched DNA, determined he died in the explosion, and pretty much figured out the whole rest of the story in 24-48 hours?
Sorry, I don’t buy it.
And then I said in the Newsletter that after 9/11 and the Las Vegas Mandalay Bay shooting, I don’t really buy ANYTHING that the FBI puts out there.
The same FBI that has spent the last 4 years trying everything they can to frame President Trump and Michael Flynn (and failing at it, by the way).
A couple people emailed me and asked what I meant when I said I didn’t trust the official 9/11 story.
I really appreciate the question.
And the best way for me to explain it to you is to just show you this video.
This video is truly only 5 minutes but it moves so fast you might need to watch it 3 or 4 times to let everything sink in.
It’s one of my favorite videos.
The video doesn’t tell you what to think or what conclusions to draw, it just lists the “official story” that the media has pushed and pulls it all together so you can listen to exactly what they want you to believe.
And as you listen, if you’re like me eventually you reach a point where you have to say, “how stupid do they think we are?”
And that’s the point when you realize you’ve likely been fed a huge pile of horse shit with the “official FBI story.”
But that’s just my conclusion, you can judge for yourself.
Please enjoy:
And thanks to a reader suggestion, I am now putting the Rumble video first (above) and the YouScared video second as a “backup” source.
I will probably start dropping the YouTube source altogether soon.
But for now I’d rather give you two versions to make sure you see it.
So here is YT:
I’d love to know what you think.
Do you buy what they’re trying to sell you?