welovetrump--2020-11-10--The Washington Post Corroborates Watermarked Ballots Story!

To everyone who says the watermarked ballot story is “ fake news ” ….the evidence just keeps piling up !
And as new evidence arises , I will report it here !
This is becoming a MEGA article !
There is a lot to take in here , but I ’ m going to start with the newest piece of evidence , and it ’ s from the far-left WaPo of all places .
Here ’ s the key part of the article ( I ’ ve highlighted the key word for you ) : And here is more of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Washington Post of all places : An 11- page assessment of mail voting risks released by the Department of Homeland Security ’ s cybersecurity division outlines dangers including cyberattacks that could undermine mail ballot processing .
It also warns of possible delays in tabulating ballots that arrive after Election Day .
It even cautions that U.S. adversaries might use partisan differences over mail voting to undermine faith in the election .
But it doesn ’ t mention fraud once .
That stands in stark contrast to the president , who has repeatedly claimed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to widespread fraud .
More recently Trump has pared back his attacks by saying mail voting will be done well in Florida and Arizona but is still dangerous elsewhere — seemingly because that is politically advantageous for him .
The document from DHS ’ s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ( CISA ) is dramatic evidence of the jarring difference between Trump ’ s views of mail voting and the assessments of security professionals in his own government .
Trump , for example , has slammed mail voting because late-arriving mail ballots may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Election results on the night of the Election , not days , months , or even years later !
” he tweeted .
CISA , by contrast , acknowledges there might be delays and says “ election officials , media , candidates , and non-governmental organizations are working collaboratively to educate voters and set the expectations that the results on election night will be less comprehensive and it will take days , if not weeks , to determine the outcome of many races.
” A CISA spokesperson told me “ CISA assesses a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mail does not create a net increase in cybersecurity risk to voting infrastructure but instead moves risk to centralized processing infrastructure and additional third-party support .
While this report examines those risks to infrastructure , issues of criminal abuses and fraud are outside the scope of the assessment.
” The document makes no mention of Trump ’ s attacks on mail voting .
But it does note that “ mail-in voting has already become an issue among partisan political voices ” and warns that makes it a juicy target for Russia and other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Specifically , “ threat actors may exploit a delay in [ election ] results to sow discord , manipulate public discourse , and discredit the electoral system , all to undermine the U.S. democratic system , ” the assessment notes .
“ To mitigate the risk of disinformation , voters should receive accurate information about mail-in voting to increase their understanding of the process along with reminders to rely on authoritative sources such as their state and local election officials when questions arise , ” it adds .
CISA ’ s assessment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the possibility of delayed election results – and the opportunity that could create for Trump or someone else to sow doubts .
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg , for example , warned during an employee meeting the social media giant may need to add explanatory labels to posts by media and political figures that claim victory in races where results aren ’ t final , BuzzFeed ’ s Craig Silverman and Ryan Mac report .
Zuckerberg didn ’ t have a plan for Trump declaring victory before there are valid results , BuzzFeed reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re in unprecedented territory with the president saying some of the things that he ’ s saying that I find quite troubling , ” Zuckerberg said .
“ We ’ re thinking through what policy may be appropriate here .
This is obviously going to be a sensitive thing to work through.
” The CISA assessment doesn ’ t deny there are risks to states dramatically increasing mail voting during the pandemic .
But it treats those risks as natural byproducts of any major undertaking , warning that “ all forms of voting…bring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” For each risk , the document also lists “ compensating controls ” that state and local election officials can implement to make mail voting safer .
It also lists nine different “ procedural controls ” that should give voters confidence their votes are being tabulated correctly and phony ballots can ’ t sneak in .
Those include verifying voters ’ signatures against another signature on record , a privacy envelope preventing anyone from giving different treatment to ballots marked for particular candidates , specialized codes allowing voters to track their ballots , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ When implemented properly , mail-in voting has a series of layered safeguards to defend the process from manipulation , ” the assessment states .
A surge in mail voting may actually make the election more secure against hacking .
That ’ s because it probably will reduce the number of people who vote on outdated machines that lack a paper record .
Those machines make it impossible for officials to audit votes after the election and ensure they were recorded accurately and not manipulated by hackers .
There is a LOT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ watermarked ballots has proven to be one of the most controversial stories we have ever covered .
And we are continuing to investigate and report on it here at WeLoveTrump .
The biggest complaint most people have is they say “ DHS doesn ’ t print the ballots.
” If that ’ s all you ’ ve got to discredit the story , that just shows ignorance .
Do you have any idea how often the governments partners with ( or commandeers ) private business when it is conducting a sting ?
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will do this ” .
Just because DHS doesn ’ t print the ballots itself , does not mean they didn ’ t exert control over them .
And we ’ re starting to see a bunch of new evidence come out that this may be the case .
Let ’ s start with BCP , who has repeatedly given us reliable information over the years , and has been endorsed by Don Jr .
He is validating the theory : The Gateway Pundit explained more about what I told you above with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Twitter and liberals freaked out thinking they might have gotten caught in their attempt to steal this year ’ s election .
Shaffer has a credible record and one of the first to confirm that President Trump was being spied on back in March 2017 .
We covered this in prior posts : Based on his impressive record , we were curious about Shaffer ’ s tweets and so we contacted him and he shared the following comments : The tweets were questions for people to think about .
We know that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russia collusion scam were still around and to think that they were going to allow the President to freely win the 2020 election was foolish .
Of course there would be a major effort to prevent President Trump from winning .
Certainly the President ’ s team prepared for this year ’ s election and would have considered possible voter fraud on a large scale due to the current environment in the US .
Tony posed his questions and the left went crazy and based on this they must know what they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decide this election and the Constitution is on the side of the President .
Any illegal votes should not be counted and when this is addressed the President will win the election .
There are many actions by the Democrats that indicate they are attempting to steal the election .
( We have reported numerous stories on this subject since the election . )
The Constitution requires that all valid ballots be received and counted on the first Tuesday in November .
Any efforts to drag the election out after this date are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrats to prevent oversight and transparency are likely due to corruption .
Why has the Biden campaign not urged for transparency during this process ?
Where there is no transparency there is something being hidden .
How come Texas and Florida can be transparent and provide results on Election eve but other states could not and even stopped counting ?
Historically Iowa and Wisconsin , Pennsylvania and Ohio and Florida and Georgia vote very similarly .
What happened this year to break this connection ?
Why were things changed late at night in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is an ongoing investigation into any of this would the President comment on it or would it be more proper not to ?
Finally Shaffer pointed out that the Democrats again put us in a position we have never been in before .
Then I ask you this… .
Does Trump look worried to you ?
And then there is this .
Read this whole thread here .
Have you heard a lot about CISA recently ?
What is it ?
Is it real ?
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ( CISA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advisor , working with partners to defend against today ’ s threats and collaborating to build more secure and resilient infrastructure for the future .
• The blue outer ring and the inner red ring indicate CISA ’ s unity with DHS and a nod to our efforts to cut through government red tape , while the three blue lines in the outer ring represent the Agency ’ s three congressionally mandated missions : cybersecurity , infrastructure security , and emergency communications .
• The eagle faces to the right , signifying CISA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and forward posture .
• The center shield represents CISA ’ s commitment to “ Defend Today , Secure Tomorrow , ” while the eagle ’ s folded wings reinforce CISA ’ s protection and defense of our nation .
• The image includes wavelengths representing the emergency communications mission , which emanate from buildings that signify the infrastructure security mission , while the nodes in the eagle ’ s arm indicate the cybersecurity mission .
• The bridge represents the vital , two-way connection , communication , and collaboration between the public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ key to CISA ’ s mission success .
CISA ’ s new logo officially launched April 30 and has layers of meaning representing the Agency and its mission .
The threats we face—digital and physical , man-made , technological , and natural—are more complex , and the threat actors more diverse , than at any point in our history .
CISA is at the heart of mobilizing a collective defense as we lead the Nation ’ s efforts to understand and manage risk to our critical infrastructure .
What We Do CISA builds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attacks and works with the federal government to provide cybersecurity tools , incident response services and assessment capabilities to safeguard the ‘ .gov ’ networks that support the essential operations of partner departments and agencies .
We coordinate security and resilience efforts using trusted partnerships across the private and public sectors , and deliver technical assistance and assessments to federal stakeholders as well as to infrastructure owners and operators nationwide .
CISA also delivers insights on these assessments related to current capabilities to identify gaps , which—along with an examination of emerging technologies—help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both near- and long-term ) .
CISA enhances public safety interoperable communications at all levels of government to help partners across the country develop their emergency communications capabilities .
Working with stakeholders across the country , CISA conducts extensive , nationwide outreach to support and promote the ability of emergency response providers and relevant government officials to continue to communicate in the event of a natural disaster , act of terrorism , or other man-made disaster .
The National Risk Management Center ( NRMC ) is housed within the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a planning , analysis , and collaboration center working to identify and address the most significant risks to our nation ’ s critical infrastructure .
NRMC works in close coordination with the private sector and other key stakeholders in the critical infrastructure community to : Identify ; Analyze ; Prioritize ; and Manage the most strategic risks to our National Critical Functions—the functions of government and the private sector so vital to the United States that their disruption , corruption , or dysfunction would have a debilitating impact on security , national economic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , or any combination .
CISA published this official statement on November 4 : Following the final day of voting , Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency , Christopher Krebs , issued the following statement : “ Over the last four years , the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ( CISA ) has been a part of a whole-of-nation effort to ensure American voters decide American elections .
Importantly , after millions of Americans voted , we have no evidence any foreign adversary was capable of preventing Americans from voting or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only here because of the hard work of state and local election officials and private sector partners who have focused efforts on enhancing the security and resilience of elections .
The United States government supported these partners throughout the election , bringing the full range of capabilities to bear in securing systems and pushing back against malicious actors seeking to disrupt our process and interfere in our election .
CISA will continue to support our state and local partners as they move toward their certification deadlines and the official outcome of the 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for any attempts by foreign actors to target or disrupt the ongoing vote counting and final certification of results .
The American people are the last line of defense against foreign influence efforts and we encourage continued patience in the coming days and weeks .
Keep calm , continue to look to your state and local election officials for trusted information on election results and visit CISA.gov/rumorcontrol for facts on election security.
” But what about the watermarks ?
Is it true that ballots are watermarked or is that just “ fake news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CISA.gov and find this : Now , what else do we know ?
First , two new videos came out today and I ’ m giving you the Bitchute links .
First up is from Dr. Steve Pieczenik and it ’ s a bombshell if true : The second is from Charlie Ward .
I don ’ t know if either of those men are “ in the know ” or telling the truth , I ’ m just reporting what I am finding .
Here are more Tweets from today , November @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reporting on the story ?
Check out this recent interview with Mark Taylor on the Daily Truth Report : And in case that doesn ’ t work or gets taken down , I have a backup .
In case you ’ re coming into this story late , the rest of this article is what I originally first reported on November 4 : I ’ m not reporting this as true , I don ’ t know .
But I do find it VERY interesting .
And it just seems like something my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reporting is that we are FAR from the end of this story .
There is a whole lot to still play out , and I believe Trump will be standing as the victor in the end .
We all know President Trump is not dumb .
He ’ s a military strategist who spent most of his career studying The Art of War by Sun Tzu….and then implementing it to perfection .
Do you really want me to believe he couldn ’ t predict they would try to steal the election through the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t do anything about it ?
Just sat there helpless as they stole it from him ?
I don ’ t buy that for a second .
I repeat….I DO NOT know if this is true , but I find it incredibly interesting .
Is this what happened ?
Are we witnessing the greatest military sting operation of all time starting to play out before our very eyes ?
That makes A LOT of sense , doesn ’ t it ?
As # 17 always says , sometimes you can ’ t TELL @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them .
What better way to “ show ” the fraud than to let it play out on a grand scale ?
Always knowing you held the “ Trump card ” .
How beautiful it would be !
And after all the fraud was stripped away , would we come to find out President Trump won in a massive landslide ?
The numbers just don ’ t add up .
Is anyone buying this ?
So…what do you think ?
Does it feel right to you ?
Is President Trump about to go @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history of our country ?
I can ’ t think of anything more legendary than if this is truly how things play out .
NATIONAL POLL : Should Ilhan Omar Be IMPEACHED and Removed From Office ?
All will be exposed soon , hang in there .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
83,009 views
To everyone who says the watermarked ballot story is “fake news”….the evidence just keeps piling up!
And as new evidence arises, I will report it here!
This is becoming a MEGA article!
There is a lot to take in here, but I’m going to start with the newest piece of evidence, and it’s from the far-left WaPo of all places.
Check this out:
Washington Post CONFIRMS Watermarked Ballots sting OP from a story published this past August! pic.twitter.com/pbPiptAzOM — Daniel Lee (@dnajlion7) November 9, 2020
Here’s the key part of the article (I’ve highlighted the key word for you):
And here is more of the article in context, from the Washington Post of all places:
An 11- page assessment of mail voting risks released by the Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity division outlines dangers including cyberattacks that could undermine mail ballot processing. It also warns of possible delays in tabulating ballots that arrive after Election Day.
It even cautions that U.S. adversaries might use partisan differences over mail voting to undermine faith in the election. But it doesn’t mention fraud once. That stands in stark contrast to the president, who has repeatedly claimed without evidence that mail voting will lead to widespread fraud. More recently Trump has pared back his attacks by saying mail voting will be done well in Florida and Arizona but is still dangerous elsewhere — seemingly because that is politically advantageous for him. The document from DHS’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is dramatic evidence of the jarring difference between Trump’s views of mail voting and the assessments of security professionals in his own government. Trump, for example, has slammed mail voting because late-arriving mail ballots may delay election results. “Must know Election results on the night of the Election, not days, months, or even years later!” he tweeted. CISA, by contrast, acknowledges there might be delays and says “election officials, media, candidates, and non-governmental organizations are working collaboratively to educate voters and set the expectations that the results on election night will be less comprehensive and it will take days, if not weeks, to determine the outcome of many races.” A CISA spokesperson told me “CISA assesses a shift to absentee voting or voting by mail does not create a net increase in cybersecurity risk to voting infrastructure but instead moves risk to centralized processing infrastructure and additional third-party support. While this report examines those risks to infrastructure, issues of criminal abuses and fraud are outside the scope of the assessment.” The document makes no mention of Trump’s attacks on mail voting. But it does note that “mail-in voting has already become an issue among partisan political voices” and warns that makes it a juicy target for Russia and other U.S. adversaries to exploit with disinformation campaigns. Specifically, “threat actors may exploit a delay in [election] results to sow discord, manipulate public discourse, and discredit the electoral system, all to undermine the U.S. democratic system,” the assessment notes. “To mitigate the risk of disinformation, voters should receive accurate information about mail-in voting to increase their understanding of the process along with reminders to rely on authoritative sources such as their state and local election officials when questions arise,” it adds. CISA’s assessment reflects how many groups are grappling with the possibility of delayed election results – and the opportunity that could create for Trump or someone else to sow doubts. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, for example, warned during an employee meeting the social media giant may need to add explanatory labels to posts by media and political figures that claim victory in races where results aren’t final, BuzzFeed’s Craig Silverman and Ryan Mac report. Zuckerberg didn’t have a plan for Trump declaring victory before there are valid results, BuzzFeed reported.
“This is where we’re in unprecedented territory with the president saying some of the things that he’s saying that I find quite troubling,” Zuckerberg said. “We’re thinking through what policy may be appropriate here. This is obviously going to be a sensitive thing to work through.” The CISA assessment doesn’t deny there are risks to states dramatically increasing mail voting during the pandemic. But it treats those risks as natural byproducts of any major undertaking, warning that “all forms of voting…bring a variety of cyber and infrastructure risks.” For each risk, the document also lists “compensating controls” that state and local election officials can implement to make mail voting safer. It also lists nine different “procedural controls” that should give voters confidence their votes are being tabulated correctly and phony ballots can’t sneak in. Those include verifying voters’ signatures against another signature on record, a privacy envelope preventing anyone from giving different treatment to ballots marked for particular candidates, specialized codes allowing voters to track their ballots, and watermarks linking ballots to particular jurisdictions. “When implemented properly, mail-in voting has a series of layered safeguards to defend the process from manipulation,” the assessment states. A surge in mail voting may actually make the election more secure against hacking. That’s because it probably will reduce the number of people who vote on outdated machines that lack a paper record. Those machines make it impossible for officials to audit votes after the election and ensure they were recorded accurately and not manipulated by hackers.
A TON more here:
Now let’s keep going…
There is a LOT more to go.
The theory of watermarked ballots has proven to be one of the most controversial stories we have ever covered.
And we are continuing to investigate and report on it here at WeLoveTrump.
The biggest complaint most people have is they say “DHS doesn’t print the ballots.”
If that’s all you’ve got to discredit the story, that just shows ignorance.
Do you have any idea how often the governments partners with (or commandeers) private business when it is conducting a sting?
The government comes in and says “you will do this”.
Just because DHS doesn’t print the ballots itself, does not mean they didn’t exert control over them.
And we’re starting to see a bunch of new evidence come out that this may be the case.
Let’s start with BCP, who has repeatedly given us reliable information over the years, and has been endorsed by Don Jr.
He is validating the theory:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5ar_P1fNY0
The Gateway Pundit explained more about what I told you above with private contractors:
President Trump has a great case and will win this election based on the Constitution per retired Intel Operative Tony Shaffer.
Tony Shaffer is a retired Intelligence Operative and current President of the London Center for Policy Research and a member of President Trump’s 2020 Advisory Board. He believes the President won the election and has a great case in the courts to prove it. Shaffer created a fire on Twitter yesterday when he questioned whether the President may have marked all the ballots in this year’s election which would indicate if a ballot counted was legitimate or not. Shaffer tweeted this:
A hypothetical question for all the Democrat trolls following my feed…
What if DHS anticipated DNC counting fraud.
What if they "tagged" each legitimate ballot.
What would happen if DHS does an audit of all counted ballots and find ballots without the tag – what happens then? — Tony Shaffer (@T_S_P_O_O_K_Y) November 6, 2020
A hypothetical question for all the Democrat trolls following my feed…
What if DHS anticipated DNC counting fraud.
What if they “tagged” each legitimate ballot.
What would happen if DHS does an audit of all counted ballots and find ballots without the tag – what happens then? Next Shaffer made some comments and asked another question: It’s done in known contracted sights…you do understand law enforcement asks for cooperation all the time from companies, right?
It's done in known contracted sights…you do understand law enforcement asks for cooperation all the time from companies, right? — Tony Shaffer (@T_S_P_O_O_K_Y) November 6, 2020
A third tweet from Shaffer indicated that there are numerous ways to mark documents without the markings clearly identifiable: Oh, there is more than that now…
People don’t understand how light works…and what they don’t see can be seen in infrared and ultraviolet…we had a whole block of instruction at “the Farm” on secret writing…it is amazing…
Oh, there is more than that now…
People don't understand how light works…and what they don't see can be seen in infrared and ultraviolet…we had a whole block of instruction at "the Farm" on secret writing…it is amazing… — Tony Shaffer (@T_S_P_O_O_K_Y) November 6, 2020
This caused an uproar on Twitter and liberals freaked out thinking they might have gotten caught in their attempt to steal this year’s election. Shaffer has a credible record and one of the first to confirm that President Trump was being spied on back in March 2017. We covered this in prior posts: Based on his impressive record, we were curious about Shaffer’s tweets and so we contacted him and he shared the following comments: The tweets were questions for people to think about. We know that the same people who were behind the Russia collusion scam were still around and to think that they were going to allow the President to freely win the 2020 election was foolish. Of course there would be a major effort to prevent President Trump from winning. Certainly the President’s team prepared for this year’s election and would have considered possible voter fraud on a large scale due to the current environment in the US. Tony posed his questions and the left went crazy and based on this they must know what they are doing is unjust. The courts will decide this election and the Constitution is on the side of the President. Any illegal votes should not be counted and when this is addressed the President will win the election. There are many actions by the Democrats that indicate they are attempting to steal the election. (We have reported numerous stories on this subject since the election.) The Constitution requires that all valid ballots be received and counted on the first Tuesday in November. Any efforts to drag the election out after this date are likely not legitimate. Efforts by the Democrats to prevent oversight and transparency are likely due to corruption. Why has the Biden campaign not urged for transparency during this process? Where there is no transparency there is something being hidden. How come Texas and Florida can be transparent and provide results on Election eve but other states could not and even stopped counting? Historically Iowa and Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Ohio and Florida and Georgia vote very similarly. What happened this year to break this connection? Why were things changed late at night in some of these states? If there is an ongoing investigation into any of this would the President comment on it or would it be more proper not to?
Finally Shaffer pointed out that the Democrats again put us in a position we have never been in before. The President’s son tweeted yesterday something similar:
When America sees everything we are uncovering they will be disgusted and even the media won’t be able to pretend voter fraud isn’t real. Ending this crap once and for all will be fundamental to preserving our republic and faith in democracy. — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) November 6, 2020
When America sees everything we are uncovering they will be disgusted and even the media won’t be able to pretend voter fraud isn’t real. Ending this crap once and for all will be fundamental to preserving our republic and faith in democracy. Let’s pray for the country and that the demons trying to destroy it are caught and justice is served.
Then I ask you this….
Does Trump look worried to you?
https://twitter.com/flasher_mig/status/1325158748164300800
Official Statements:
https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1324721472347262977
Statement from President Trump: "this election is far from over. Joe Biden has not been certified as the winner of any states, let alone any of the highly contested states headed for mandatory recounts, or states where our campaign has valid and legitimate legal challenges" pic.twitter.com/GTnqhxYizy — Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) November 7, 2020
And then there is this.
Read this whole thread here.
Watch my friend Daniel here:
Now let’s talk about CISA.
Have you heard a lot about CISA recently?
What is it? Is it real?
Yes, it’s real.
From CISA.gov:
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is the Nation’s risk advisor, working with partners to defend against today’s threats and collaborating to build more secure and resilient infrastructure for the future.• The blue outer ring and the inner red ring indicate CISA’s unity with DHS and a nod to our efforts to cut through government red tape, while the three blue lines in the outer ring represent the Agency’s three congressionally mandated missions: cybersecurity, infrastructure security, and emergency communications. • The eagle faces to the right, signifying CISA’s keen eye on the future and forward posture. • The center shield represents CISA’s commitment to “Defend Today, Secure Tomorrow,” while the eagle’s folded wings reinforce CISA’s protection and defense of our nation. • The image includes wavelengths representing the emergency communications mission, which emanate from buildings that signify the infrastructure security mission, while the nodes in the eagle’s arm indicate the cybersecurity mission. • The bridge represents the vital, two-way connection, communication, and collaboration between the public and private sectors, which is so key to CISA’s mission success. CISA’s new logo officially launched April 30 and has layers of meaning representing the Agency and its mission. The threats we face—digital and physical, man-made, technological, and natural—are more complex, and the threat actors more diverse, than at any point in our history. CISA is at the heart of mobilizing a collective defense as we lead the Nation’s efforts to understand and manage risk to our critical infrastructure. What We Do
CISA builds the national capacity to defend against cyber attacks and works with the federal government to provide cybersecurity tools, incident response services and assessment capabilities to safeguard the ‘.gov’ networks that support the essential operations of partner departments and agencies. We coordinate security and resilience efforts using trusted partnerships across the private and public sectors, and deliver technical assistance and assessments to federal stakeholders as well as to infrastructure owners and operators nationwide. CISA also delivers insights on these assessments related to current capabilities to identify gaps, which—along with an examination of emerging technologies—help determine the demand for future capabilities (both near- and long-term). CISA enhances public safety interoperable communications at all levels of government to help partners across the country develop their emergency communications capabilities. Working with stakeholders across the country, CISA conducts extensive, nationwide outreach to support and promote the ability of emergency response providers and relevant government officials to continue to communicate in the event of a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster. The National Risk Management Center (NRMC) is housed within the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). NRMC is a planning, analysis, and collaboration center working to identify and address the most significant risks to our nation’s critical infrastructure. NRMC works in close coordination with the private sector and other key stakeholders in the critical infrastructure community to: Identify; Analyze; Prioritize; and Manage the most strategic risks to our National Critical Functions—the functions of government and the private sector so vital to the United States that their disruption, corruption, or dysfunction would have a debilitating impact on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination.
CISA published this official statement on November 4:
Following the final day of voting, Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Christopher Krebs, issued the following statement: “Over the last four years, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has been a part of a whole-of-nation effort to ensure American voters decide American elections. Importantly, after millions of Americans voted, we have no evidence any foreign adversary was capable of preventing Americans from voting or changing vote tallies. “We are only here because of the hard work of state and local election officials and private sector partners who have focused efforts on enhancing the security and resilience of elections. The United States government supported these partners throughout the election, bringing the full range of capabilities to bear in securing systems and pushing back against malicious actors seeking to disrupt our process and interfere in our election. CISA will continue to support our state and local partners as they move toward their certification deadlines and the official outcome of the 2020 election. “We will remain vigilant for any attempts by foreign actors to target or disrupt the ongoing vote counting and final certification of results. The American people are the last line of defense against foreign influence efforts and we encourage continued patience in the coming days and weeks. Keep calm, continue to look to your state and local election officials for trusted information on election results and visit CISA.gov/rumorcontrol for facts on election security.” #Protect2020
But what about the watermarks?
Is it true that ballots are watermarked or is that just “fake news”?
Again, we go to CISA.gov and find this:
Note I highlighted “watermarks” for you.
That’s straight from the .gov website folks!
Now, what else do we know?
First, two new videos came out today and I’m giving you the Bitchute links.
First up is from Dr. Steve Pieczenik and it’s a bombshell if true:
The second is from Charlie Ward.
Bitchute video here:
I don’t know if either of those men are “in the know” or telling the truth, I’m just reporting what I am finding.
I report, you decide!
Here are more Tweets from today, November 6:
https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1324758542881038338
You know who else is reporting on the story?
Mark Taylor.
Check out this recent interview with Mark Taylor on the Daily Truth Report:
And in case that doesn’t work or gets taken down, I have a backup.
View here on Rumble:
In case you’re coming into this story late, the rest of this article is what I originally first reported on November 4:
Ok folks, buckle up!
I’m not reporting this as true, I don’t know.
But I do find it VERY interesting.
And it just seems like something my President would do.
What I am reporting is that we are FAR from the end of this story.
There is a whole lot to still play out, and I believe Trump will be standing as the victor in the end.
We all know President Trump is not dumb.
He’s a military strategist who spent most of his career studying The Art of War by Sun Tzu….and then implementing it to perfection.
He’s always five steps ahead.
Do you really want me to believe he couldn’t predict they would try to steal the election through the mail in ballots and he didn’t do anything about it?
Didn’t have a plan in place?
Just sat there helpless as they stole it from him?
I don’t buy that for a second.
I repeat….I DO NOT know if this is true, but I find it incredibly interesting.
Is this what happened?
Are we witnessing the greatest military sting operation of all time starting to play out before our very eyes?
Take a look:
https://twitter.com/jdburney1/status/1324066917376761857
https://twitter.com/jdburney1/status/1324086430600232961
That makes A LOT of sense, doesn’t it?
As #17 always says, sometimes you can’t TELL the people, you have to SHOW them.
What better way to “show” the fraud than to let it play out on a grand scale?
Always knowing you held the “Trump card”.
Oh my!
How beautiful it would be!
And after all the fraud was stripped away, would we come to find out President Trump won in a massive landslide?
400 electoral votes?
500 electoral votes?
Keep watching.
https://twitter.com/PlastiksurgeonE/status/1323930156965253121
Our President is a brilliant man:
https://twitter.com/skyzbabe3/status/1323985008995012608
https://twitter.com/skyzbabe3/status/1323983874049904641
So reports that there were hidden watermarks on genuine polling cards and dems put whole load of fake in as they didn’t know….Court action could get interesting. Please be true 😂😂😂 — Janekin24 #EndLockdowns. #UsForThem GAB same name (@janekin24) November 4, 2020
https://twitter.com/PlastiksurgeonE/status/1323972051632345089
The numbers just don’t add up.
Is anyone buying this?
https://twitter.com/KodaiOkuda/status/1323931264622145536
https://twitter.com/jdburney1/status/1324161636182228992
https://twitter.com/jdburney1/status/1324123546822549513
https://twitter.com/hueygirl474/status/1324123955196735495
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1324123192529723392
So…what do you think?
Does it make sense?
Does it feel right to you?
Is President Trump about to go down as the best President in the history of our country?
I can’t think of anything more legendary than if this is truly how things play out.
Oh my!
All will be exposed soon, hang in there.
Keep watching.
Keep the faith.
Keep fighting!


welovetrump--2020-11-10--Bill Barr Makes His Move, Authorizes DOJ To Go After Voter Fraud!

He waited for the dust to settle , and now it looks like he ’ s swooping in….with the full power of the DOJ behind him .
Here are more details , from Breitbart : Attorney General William Barr in a memo issued on Monday authorized the Justice Department ( DOJ ) to look into voting irregularities in the 2020 presidential election .
The memo was addressed and signed from Barr to U.S .
Attorneys , the assistant attorneys general for the DOJ ’ s criminal division , civil rights division , the national security division , and the director @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FBI ) , Christopher Wray .
“ Now that the voting has concluded , it is imperative that the American people can trust that our elections were conducted in such a way that the outcomes accurately reflect the will of the voters , ” the memo read .
Barr ’ s memo comes after 39 House Republicans pressed Barr in a letter on Friday to allow available DOJ resources to look into allegations of voting irregularities across the country in several key battleground states .
The Trump campaign has filed a number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Barr said in his memo that , although the states have the primary responsibility to conduct and supervise elections , the DOJ has “ an obligation to ensure that federal elections are conducted in such a way that the American people can have full confidence in their electoral process and their government.
” He added that while “ most allegations ” of purported election misconduct are of such a scale that they would not impact the outcome of an election that their investigation can be deferred , “ that is not always the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actions taken by the DOJ in this case are greatly minimized , since the voting has concluded .
He also said he has already authorized the DOJ to pursue substantial allegations of voting and voting tabulation irregularities in specific instances .
“ Given this , and given that voting in our current elections has now concluded , I authorize you to pursue substantial allegations of voting and vote tabulation irregularities prior to the certification of elections in your jurisdictions in certain cases , as I have already done in specific instances , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reviews may be conducted if there are clear and apparently-credible allegations of irregularities that , if true , could potentially impact the outcome of a federal election in an individual state .
“ While U.S .
Attorneys maintain their inherent authority to conduct inquiries and investigations as they deem appropriate , it will likely be prudent to commence any election-related matters as a preliminary inquiry , so as to assess whether available evidence warrants further investigative steps , ” he said .
He also urged for the DOJ to exercise “ great care @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on “ specious , speculative , fanciful or far-fetched claims .
”

Bill Barr is finally making his move!
He waited for the dust to settle, and now it looks like he’s swooping in….with the full power of the DOJ behind him.
Take a look:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325973224522473475
Here are more details, from Breitbart:
Attorney General William Barr in a memo issued on Monday authorized the Justice Department (DOJ) to look into voting irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.
The memo was addressed and signed from Barr to U.S. Attorneys, the assistant attorneys general for the DOJ’s criminal division, civil rights division, the national security division, and the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Christopher Wray.
“Now that the voting has concluded, it is imperative that the American people can trust that our elections were conducted in such a way that the outcomes accurately reflect the will of the voters,” the memo read.
Barr’s memo comes after 39 House Republicans pressed Barr in a letter on Friday to allow available DOJ resources to look into allegations of voting irregularities across the country in several key battleground states. The Trump campaign has filed a number of lawsuits in some of those states.
Barr said in his memo that, although the states have the primary responsibility to conduct and supervise elections, the DOJ has “an obligation to ensure that federal elections are conducted in such a way that the American people can have full confidence in their electoral process and their government.”
He added that while “most allegations” of purported election misconduct are of such a scale that they would not impact the outcome of an election that their investigation can be deferred, “that is not always the case.”
He said concerns that overt actions taken by the DOJ in this case are greatly minimized, since the voting has concluded.
He also said he has already authorized the DOJ to pursue substantial allegations of voting and voting tabulation irregularities in specific instances.
“Given this, and given that voting in our current elections has now concluded, I authorize you to pursue substantial allegations of voting and vote tabulation irregularities prior to the certification of elections in your jurisdictions in certain cases, as I have already done in specific instances,” he said.
He said inquiries and reviews may be conducted if there are clear and apparently-credible allegations of irregularities that, if true, could potentially impact the outcome of a federal election in an individual state.
“While U.S. Attorneys maintain their inherent authority to conduct inquiries and investigations as they deem appropriate, it will likely be prudent to commence any election-related matters as a preliminary inquiry, so as to assess whether available evidence warrants further investigative steps,” he said.
He also urged for the DOJ to exercise “great care and judgment’ and not launch inquiries on “specious, speculative, fanciful or far-fetched claims.”


welovetrump--2020-11-10--Trump Allies Say He Will Not Concede Any Time Soon

Allies close to president Trump say he will not concede anytime soon .
After the declaration on Saturday that Democrat Joe Biden had won the race for the White House , Republican President Donald Trump and his allies made one thing clear : he does not plan to concede anytime soon .
The president , who has spent months trying to undermine the election results with unproven allegations of fraud , pledged on Saturday to go forward with a legal strategy that he hopes will overturn state results that gave Biden the win in Tuesday ’ s vote .
Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conflicted on how to proceed , largely supported his strategy or remained silent .
“ The simple fact is this election is far from over .
Joe Biden has not been certified as the winner of any states , let alone any of the highly contested states headed for mandatory recounts , or states where our campaign has valid and legitimate legal challenges that could determine the ultimate victor , ” Trump said in a statement released by his campaign around midday .
The president ’ s allies and advisers privately admitted that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chances of overturning the election results and staying in the White House were slim .
While preparing for an eventual concession , they called for time to let the legal challenges run their course .
“ He should allow the recounts to go forward , file whatever claims there are , and then if nothing changes he should concede , ” said one Trump advisor .
The Trump campaign and Republicans have brought numerous lawsuits over alleged election irregularities .
Judges tossed cases in Georgia , Michigan and Nevada .
In Pennsylvania , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provisional ballots set aside and granted Republican observers greater access to vote counting .
Legal experts said the legal challenges were too narrow in scope to have an impact on the outcome of the election .
Meanwhile , Republicans are trying to raise at least $ 60 million to fund legal challenges , sources told Reuters .
“ He should make sure every vote is counted and demand transparency .
That puts him on solid rhetorical grounds , ” said another former White House official .

Allies close to president Trump say he will not concede anytime soon.
Here's the story from Reuters:
After the declaration on Saturday that Democrat Joe Biden had won the race for the White House, Republican President Donald Trump and his allies made one thing clear: he does not plan to concede anytime soon.
The president, who has spent months trying to undermine the election results with unproven allegations of fraud, pledged on Saturday to go forward with a legal strategy that he hopes will overturn state results that gave Biden the win in Tuesday’s vote. Trump aides and Republican allies, while somewhat conflicted on how to proceed, largely supported his strategy or remained silent.
“The simple fact is this election is far from over. Joe Biden has not been certified as the winner of any states, let alone any of the highly contested states headed for mandatory recounts, or states where our campaign has valid and legitimate legal challenges that could determine the ultimate victor,” Trump said in a statement released by his campaign around midday.
The president’s allies and advisers privately admitted that the former New York businessman’s chances of overturning the election results and staying in the White House were slim. While preparing for an eventual concession, they called for time to let the legal challenges run their course.
“He should allow the recounts to go forward, file whatever claims there are, and then if nothing changes he should concede,” said one Trump advisor.
The Trump campaign and Republicans have brought numerous lawsuits over alleged election irregularities. Judges tossed cases in Georgia, Michigan and Nevada.
In Pennsylvania, judges sided with Republicans and ordered some provisional ballots set aside and granted Republican observers greater access to vote counting. Legal experts said the legal challenges were too narrow in scope to have an impact on the outcome of the election.
Meanwhile, Republicans are trying to raise at least $60 million to fund legal challenges, sources told Reuters.
“He should make sure every vote is counted and demand transparency. That puts him on solid rhetorical grounds,” said another former White House official.


welovetrump--2020-11-10--Dick Morris:  Here’s How Trump Can Still Win!

He ’ s probably forgotten more about elections than most people will ever know !
Trending : WATCH : Election Fraud Caught LIVE on the Air on CNN on Election Night !
Hammer/Scorecard And he just went on record saying Trump can still win this .
In fact , it ’ s not far fetched at all , it ’ s likely !
Could Trump still win ?
> > Thread by @ realChrisMBowen : 1 .
Long thread but I need everyone to read this and absorb .
Dick Morris points out what should he blaring my obvious to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Only the Electoral…… https : //t.co/MVZPA06hzl My friends over at Newsmax published his full analysis : President Donald Trump can still win the presidency .
Only the Electoral College or the various state legislatures can declare a candidate the winner .
To base this decision on network vote totals and projections and to call Biden the president-elect is irresponsible .
The recounts in Arizona , Georgia , and the other states are likely to go heavily for Trump .
Most of the likely errors or invalid votes took place on mailed in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to tamper with ) .
Since Biden won upwards of two-thirds of mail-in votes and absentee ballots , it ’ s likely that most of the discarded mail ballots will be subtracted from Biden ’ s total .
The networks currently give Trump 214 electorate voters ( 270 is the victory level ) .
Alaska , where Trump has led by 2:1 all week and is now more than half counted will likely throw its 3 votes to Trump giving him 217 .
Trump has likewise led in North Carolina ( 15 votes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 75,000 has not diminished .
He will undoubtedly carry North Carolina .
Like Alaska , the media will not call it for Trump to promote the illusion of a Biden victory .
North Carolina would bring Trump ’ s vote to 232 .
The vote count in Arizona shows Trump ’ s deficit shrinking from 30,000 on Friday to 18,500 on Saturday with about 100K left to count .
After Arizona ( 11 votes ) .
is fully counted , it will go through a recount subject to the pro-Trump bias identified in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Arizona , he would have 243 votes .
In Georgia ( 16 votes ) , Biden leads by only 8400 votes , a margin that has been dropping .
Like Arizona , Trump may still win the count and , if not , would have a very good chance of prevailing in the recount .
With Georgia , Trump would have 259 votes .
Wisconsin ( 10 votes ) is tallied as having been won by Biden by 21,000 votes but a recanvass is in the offing .
Given the facts enumerated earler @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump will carry Wisconsin .
The recount process in Wisconsin is uniquely fair and transparent — a model for the nation — so Trump may well flip the state .
If he does , he will have 269 votes — one shy of victory .
Then , it comes down Pennsylvania and its 20 votes .
The Supreme Court provisionally allowed ballots to be counted if they arrived before Friday , Nov. 6 and were postmarked before election day , Nov. 3 , and ordered late votes to be segregated .
When Justice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not segregated the late votes , as required in the Court ’ s decision , Alito reaffirmed the necessity of enforcing the court order .
Joe Biden currently leads by 37,000 votes in Pennsylvania .
The number of late arriving ballots likely far exceeds this total ( the state has not published this information ) .
Justice Alioto and a Court majority may throw out the late ballots , likely delivering the state to Trump .
Additionally , for the reasons stated above , a recanvass is likely to give Trump a decisive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he would have 289 votes and a victory .
Will there be a recount in Pennsylvania ?
The current law requires one if the margin is under 0 ; .5 % and in Pennsylvania it likely will be slightly greater .
There are two ways to trigger a recount : —First , the U.S. Supreme Court could order one after the vote counters so flagrantly violated Alito ’ s order to segregate the votes that he had to re-issue it .
And remember , four Justices wanted to reconsider whether to allow late @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 4-4 .
Now with Justice Barrett in the mix it may take a different view , particularly iff the presidency hangs in the balance .
—Second , Article II Section 1 of the US Constitution reads : “ Each State shall appoint , in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct , a Number of Electors , equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.
” The Pennsylvania State Legislature , solidly in Republican hands ( both houses ) may choose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
To build the case for doing so , it may hold hearings into the allegations of fraud so as to help the voters of the state understand how flagrantly their votes were mishandled .
Already , the leader of the State Senate in Pennsylvania and the Speaker of the State Assembly have held a press conference announcing their intention to “ audit ” the vote counting process .
So , as the great Yogi Berra said , “ It ain ’ t over ’ til the fat lady sings .
”

Dick Morris knows a LOT about politics.
And elections.
He’s probably forgotten more about elections than most people will ever know!
And he just went on record saying Trump can still win this.
In fact, it’s not far fetched at all, it’s likely!
Check this out:
Could Trump still win? >> Thread by @realChrisMBowen : 1. Long thread but I need everyone to read this and absorb. Dick Morris points out what should he blaring my obvious to most but deliberately ignored by the left. Only the Electoral…… https://t.co/MVZPA06hzl
My friends over at Newsmax published his full analysis:
President Donald Trump can still win the presidency.
Here’s how:
Only the Electoral College or the various state legislatures can declare a candidate the winner. To base this decision on network vote totals and projections and to call Biden the president-elect is irresponsible.
The recounts in Arizona, Georgia, and the other states are likely to go heavily for Trump.
Most of the likely errors or invalid votes took place on mailed in ballots. (Machine votes are harder to tamper with). Since Biden won upwards of two-thirds of mail-in votes and absentee ballots, it’s likely that most of the discarded mail ballots will be subtracted from Biden’s total.
The networks currently give Trump 214 electorate voters (270 is the victory level).
Alaska, where Trump has led by 2:1 all week and is now more than half counted will likely throw its 3 votes to Trump giving him 217.
Trump has likewise led in North Carolina (15 votes) all week and his margin of 75,000 has not diminished. He will undoubtedly carry North Carolina.
Like Alaska, the media will not call it for Trump to promote the illusion of a Biden victory. North Carolina would bring Trump’s vote to 232.
The vote count in Arizona shows Trump’s deficit shrinking from 30,000 on Friday to 18,500 on Saturday with about 100K left to count.
After Arizona (11 votes). is fully counted, it will go through a recount subject to the pro-Trump bias identified in point 2. Were he to win Arizona, he would have 243 votes.
In Georgia (16 votes), Biden leads by only 8400 votes, a margin that has been dropping.
Like Arizona, Trump may still win the count and, if not, would have a very good chance of prevailing in the recount. With Georgia, Trump would have 259 votes.
Wisconsin (10 votes) is tallied as having been won by Biden by 21,000 votes but a recanvass is in the offing. Given the facts enumerated earler, there is a very good chance Trump will carry Wisconsin. The recount process in Wisconsin is uniquely fair and transparent — a model for the nation — so Trump may well flip the state.
If he does, he will have 269 votes — one shy of victory.
Then, it comes down Pennsylvania and its 20 votes. The Supreme Court provisionally allowed ballots to be counted if they arrived before Friday, Nov. 6 and were postmarked before election day, Nov. 3, and ordered late votes to be segregated. When Justice Alito was informed that the state had not segregated the late votes, as required in the Court’s decision, Alito reaffirmed the necessity of enforcing the court order.
Joe Biden currently leads by 37,000 votes in Pennsylvania. The number of late arriving ballots likely far exceeds this total (the state has not published this information).
Justice Alioto and a Court majority may throw out the late ballots, likely delivering the state to Trump.
Additionally, for the reasons stated above, a recanvass is likely to give Trump a decisive advantage. If he wins Pennsylvania, he would have 289 votes and a victory.
Will there be a recount in Pennsylvania? The current law requires one if the margin is under 0;.5% and in Pennsylvania it likely will be slightly greater.
There are two ways to trigger a recount:
—First, the U.S. Supreme Court could order one after the vote counters so flagrantly violated Alito’s order to segregate the votes that he had to re-issue it. And remember, four Justices wanted to reconsider whether to allow late ballots entirely but the high court deadlocked 4-4. Now with Justice Barrett in the mix it may take a different view, particularly iff the presidency hangs in the balance.
—Second, Article II Section 1 of the US Constitution reads:
“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.”
The Pennsylvania State Legislature, solidly in Republican hands (both houses) may choose to demand a recount before appointing electors. To build the case for doing so, it may hold hearings into the allegations of fraud so as to help the voters of the state understand how flagrantly their votes were mishandled.
Already, the leader of the State Senate in Pennsylvania and the Speaker of the State Assembly have held a press conference announcing their intention to “audit” the vote counting process.
So, as the great Yogi Berra said, “It ain’t over ’til the fat lady sings.”
She hasn’t.


welovetrump--2020-11-10--“World Knows Trump Won #MAGA” Banner Flown Above Everton v Manchester Game

A massive “ World Knows Trump Won # MAGA ” banner was flown before the Everton v. Manchester Game .
The stadium , which has a capacity of 39,000 people , had a front row to the incredible display .
Fans and journalists were in attendance .
It was impossible to miss .
While the mainstream media the in US is pushing the narrative that Biden won , this is yet another example of the growing backlash .
More and more people believe that President Trump won the election fair and square .
# StopTheSteal continues to be one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that social media giants have appeared to “ shadowban ” the hashtag .
More details on this epic plane banner below : More and more people are doubting the media narrative that Joe Biden has “ won ” the election .
Remember , the media doesn ’ t get to choose who the next President will be !
A plane carrying the message “ World knows Trump won # MAGA ” was spotted flying over Goodison Park ahead of the Premier League match between Everton and Manchester United .
The banner grabbed the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 39,000-capacity stadium before the Saturday lunch-time kick-off .
It appeared to call into question the result of the US election which was leaning heavily towards Mr Trump ’ s Democratic rival Joe Biden as votes continued to be counted in a handful of battleground states .
The MAGA hashtag stands for Make America Great Again .
Despite trailing heavily in the race , Mr Trump has twice claimed he has actually won the vote and on Thursday night claimed without evidence that ‘ illegal votes ’ were threatening to deny him a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to support the President .
Chants of “ We won !
” and “ Stop the steal ” are prevalent at these rallies !
There is still no indication of who flew the plane… Or who paid for the banner… The reality is , however , that people want the truth to be known !
People love Donald Trump because he fights for FREEDOM !
Express has more details on the massive banner : Mr Trump is currently trailing in the Electoral College and the popular vote , and with Mr Biden holding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mr Trump has indicated he will not accept defeat , and has alleged voter fraud – without providing evidence .
The acronym MAGA stands for Make America Great Again , which was Mr Trump ’ s slogan four years ago .
There is no indication as of yet as to who has paid for the banner .
Despite the banner ’ s claims , Mr Trump ’ s prospects of victory appear to be remote , given the uphill task he would face to win a second term in the White House .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a series of legal challenges… Speaking to Express.co.uk yesterday , Mr Trump ’ s former National Security Adviser John Bolton told Express.co.uk suggested such was the billionaire ’ s antipathy to defeat , he would probably have to be persuaded to leave the White House by relative .
He added : “ This is Donald Trump we are talking about , he is not going to go graciously.
” Precisely why the match was chosen for the bizarre stunt is unclear , especially given Mr Trump has shown little interest in football over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You Like To See `` The Squad '' Voted Out of Office ?
We must continue to stand with him so that he can protect and serve the country that we love !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
889 views
This is epic!
A massive “World Knows Trump Won #MAGA” banner was flown before the Everton v. Manchester Game.
The stadium, which has a capacity of 39,000 people, had a front row to the incredible display.
Fans and journalists were in attendance.
It was impossible to miss.
While the mainstream media the in US is pushing the narrative that Biden won, this is yet another example of the growing backlash.
More and more people believe that President Trump won the election fair and square.
#StopTheSteal continues to be one of the most popular hashtags…
Despite the fact that social media giants have appeared to “shadowban” the hashtag.
More details on this epic plane banner below:
‘World knows Trump won #MAGA’ banner flown over Liverpool earlier today https://t.co/2Hp5ZhuAZD — Evening Standard (@standardnews) November 7, 2020
https://twitter.com/KING_SLAUGHTER1/status/1325060919160942593
https://twitter.com/chestercat011/status/1325054799407091712
More and more people are doubting the media narrative that Joe Biden has “won” the election.
Remember, the media doesn’t get to choose who the next President will be!
The Standard confirms this epic display:
A plane carrying the message “World knows Trump won #MAGA” was spotted flying over Goodison Park ahead of the Premier League match between Everton and Manchester United. The banner grabbed the attention of club staff and journalists inside the 39,000-capacity stadium before the Saturday lunch-time kick-off. It appeared to call into question the result of the US election which was leaning heavily towards Mr Trump’s Democratic rival Joe Biden as votes continued to be counted in a handful of battleground states. The MAGA hashtag stands for Make America Great Again. Despite trailing heavily in the race, Mr Trump has twice claimed he has actually won the vote and on Thursday night claimed without evidence that ‘illegal votes’ were threatening to deny him a rightful victory.
Trump supporters are rallying to support the President.
Chants of “We won!” and “Stop the steal” are prevalent at these rallies!
Chants of STOP THE STEAL in Harrisburg pic.twitter.com/Z5UZbrDtEr — Christopher Mathias (@letsgomathias) November 7, 2020
President @realDonaldTrump supporters car rally in Long Island, New York, call for “Stop The Steal”. #StopTheSteal pic.twitter.com/maf7kEpqVD — Aric Chen (@aricchen) November 9, 2020
There is still no indication of who flew the plane…
Or who paid for the banner…
The reality is, however, that people want the truth to be known!
People love Donald Trump because he fights for FREEDOM!
Express has more details on the massive banner:
Mr Trump is currently trailing in the Electoral College and the popular vote, and with Mr Biden holding leads in four US states… However, Mr Trump has indicated he will not accept defeat, and has alleged voter fraud – without providing evidence. The acronym MAGA stands for Make America Great Again, which was Mr Trump’s slogan four years ago. There is no indication as of yet as to who has paid for the banner. Despite the banner’s claims, Mr Trump’s prospects of victory appear to be remote, given the uphill task he would face to win a second term in the White House. SIGN THE PETITION: We Need National Voter ID! He has ordered his lawyers to launch a series of legal challenges… Speaking to Express.co.uk yesterday, Mr Trump’s former National Security Adviser John Bolton told Express.co.uk suggested such was the billionaire’s antipathy to defeat, he would probably have to be persuaded to leave the White House by relative. He added: “This is Donald Trump we are talking about, he is not going to go graciously.” Precisely why the match was chosen for the bizarre stunt is unclear, especially given Mr Trump has shown little interest in football over the years.
President Trump is a FIGHTER!
We must continue to stand with him so that he can protect and serve the country that we love!


welovetrump--2020-11-10--DITCH FOX:  Here’s Your Channel Guide For Finding Newsmax

Do you want to DITCH Fox News ?
If you want to ditch Fox but don ’ t know how @ @ @ @ @ you covered !
You ’ re going to want to print this out or bookmark @ @ @ @ @ over to Newsmax and here ’ s how to find them : You can also @ @ @ @ @ NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Have Trump 's Back 100 % ?
NATIONAL POLL @ @ @ @ @ Fox News to Newsmax ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
18,728 views
Do you want to DITCH Fox News?
Tired of that smug bastard Chris Wallace?
I can’t stand him!
If you want to ditch Fox but don’t know how, I’ve got you covered!
You’re going to want to print this out or bookmark it.
Everyone is switching over to Newsmax and here’s how to find them:
Channel Guide for Newsmax! Here's how you DITCH FOX! pic.twitter.com/FyeFr9ORHx — DailyTruthReport (@DailyTruthRpt) November 10, 2020
Find Newsmax TV on:
Satellite & Cable DirecTV Ch. 349
Dish Network Ch. 216
Comcast Xfinity Ch. 1115
Spectrum (TWC/Charter/BHH)
AT&T U-verse Ch. 1220
Verizon FiOS Ch. 615HD / 115SD
T-Vision Ch. 152
Cox Media
Optimum Ch. 102
Suddenlink Ch. 102
Mediacom Ch. 277
WOW! TV
Orby TV Ch. 308
Fision TV (Hotwire) Ch. 540HD / 121SD
Armstrong Ch. 118
SimulTV
You can also get the Newsmax app!
Or online streaming:
Online Streaming (OTT) Services
So….have you ditched Fox News?
Tap here to vote….👇
NATIONAL POLL: Have you switched from Fox News to Newsmax?


welovetrump--2020-11-10--Fall of the Cabal:  FULL Video Archived Here, Parts 1-10

YouTube has deleted almost every version of Fall of the Cabal out there so I am giving you the full @ @ @ @ @ video .
Use this link from Bitchute .
And please spread this around because CLEARLY @ @ @ @ @ information getting out .
Have to ask yourself “ why ” ?
SIGN THE PETITION @ @ @ @ @ ID !
Here you go :

YouTube has deleted almost every version of Fall of the Cabal out there so I am giving you the full 10 parts all in one video.
Use this link from Bitchute.
Please enjoy.
And please spread this around because CLEARLY they do not want this information getting out.
Have to ask yourself “why”?
The answer is obvious.
Here you go, from Bitchute:


welovetrump--2020-11-10--Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos: “I Am Directing The Committee To Immediately Review How The El

Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos: “I Am Directing The Committee To Immediately Review How The Election Was Administered”

We have been saying it here for quite a while… .
This election is JUST getting started .
Amid a @ @ @ @ @ over the country of voter fraud and election irregularity there are reports coming in of @ @ @ @ @ in many states and districts .
Wisconson is just one of several battleground states that @ @ @ @ @ blue in the middle of the night .
Concerned with the obvious red flags , @ @ @ @ @ misconduct nationwide has prompted Wisconson assembly speaker Robin Vos to direct a commitee to investigate @

We have been saying it here for quite a while….
This election is JUST getting started.
Amid a hailstorm of reports from all over the country of voter fraud and election irregularity there are reports coming in of investigations and action being taken in many states and districts.
Wisconson is just one of several battleground states that mysteriously “flipped” to blue in the middle of the night.
Concerned with the obvious red flags, glitches and reports of election misconduct nationwide has prompted Wisconson assembly speaker Robin Vos to direct a commitee to investigate.
Check it out:


welovetrump--2020-11-09--While Fact-Checkers Claim “False”, Real Americans Hold Press Conference Saying Their Dead Relatives

While Fact-Checkers Claim “False”, Real Americans Hold Press Conference Saying Their Dead Relatives Voted In The Election!

What happens when the “ fact checkers ” start blatantly lying ?
And more importantly , what punishment is there when it is proven that the “ fact checkers ” are themselves grossly lying to the American public ?
I think these questions will soon be answered .
Real Americans are rising up and presenting evidence that the so-called “ fact checkers ” are flat out liars .
And go here : The Trump campaign announced they are filing a lawsuit to stop the vote count in Nevada , alleging that up to 10,000 people voted fraudulently by mail .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ many voters in this group of mail-in people that are not proper voters , ” former Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt said in a news conference this morning .
“ We are also confident that there are thousands of people whose votes have been counted that have moved out of Clark County during the pandemic.
” Laxalt also claimed that there have been dead voters counted throughout the state , and that some voters received up to 18 ballots at their homes .
The campaign announced they are filing a lawsuit in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ stop the counting of improper votes ” due to alleged irregularities .
“ It is unacceptable in this country to have illegal votes counted , ” said Former Acting Director of the Office of National Intelligence Richard Grenell .
So far , the Trump campaign has claimed multiple counts of voter fraud throughout Michigan , Arizona , and Wisconsin that have all been debunked .
The Trump campaign held a Sunday afternoon press conference outside the Clark County Elections Department in Las Vegas to denounce alleged irregularities in last week ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Attorney General Adam Laxalt and American Conservative Union chairman Matt Schlapp .
Laxalt attacked the state ’ s signature verification process as being insufficient at protecting against supposed fraud , pointing out that Trump ’ s campaign could not observe the authenticity of some 600,000 votes that have been counted in Nevada through the mailing system .
“ This campaign has not observed , has not laid our eyes … on an envelope signature , and a voter roll signature , on a single one of those 600,000 voters , ” Laxalt said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Laxalt further criticized the Clark County Registrar ’ s use of a signature verification machine called the “ Agilis system.
” “ At least 200,000 voters were counted through the signature verification process of this machine only , ” Laxalt said .
“ I will repeat for the media : No human beings looked at those signature matches to confirm they were , in fact , matches .
Schlapp claimed that there were instances of underage voters , dead people , and at least 9,000 non-Nevadans who voted in Tuesday ’ s election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voted in this most recent election .
How difficult would it have been to make it clear that nobody would have been mailed a ballot if they had a birth date after a certain year ?
” Schalpp asked .
He said that more than 100,000 people have left amid an economic shutdown , “ yet through our due diligence , we ’ ve able to find that at least 9,000 of them voted in this election .
Non-Nevadans voted in Nevada.
” Both Laxalt and Schlapp stopped short of calling for specific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continue to review their options and put forth all evidence of wrong-doing that they find .
A Clark County official who wished to remain anonymous told Fox News that Laxalt ’ s claims about the Agilis machine were “ successfully refuted ” in a recent lawsuit in which a judge upheld the legality of the county using it .
Laxalt and Schlapp ’ s appearance comes after a U.S. federal court judge on Friday denied an emergency motion from Nevada Republicans seeking to change the signature verification process used in the state .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
14,788 views
What happens when the “fact checkers” start blatantly lying?
Who fact-checks the fact-checkers?
And more importantly, what punishment is there when it is proven that the “fact checkers” are themselves grossly lying to the American public?
I think these questions will soon be answered.
Real Americans are rising up and presenting evidence that the so-called “fact checkers” are flat out liars.
Watch this:
And this:
So many serious election integrity concerns: -Signed affidavits attesting to illegal activity in Pennsylvania and Nevada;
-Computer glitches flipping Republican votes to Democrats in Michigan;
-Dead people voting in Pennsylvania;
-And more. Let the legal process play out. pic.twitter.com/a8BAma7HYu — Governor Kristi Noem (@govkristinoem) November 8, 2020
And this:
"There are hundreds of dead people who voted in Clark County," said Matt Schlapp, the chairman of the American Conservative Union https://t.co/sULm1VPe0W — CBS Austin (@cbsaustin) November 9, 2020
And this:
Go back to strictly voting booths and fingerprint every individual. Watch ""DEAD PEOPLE VOTING" President Trump Team Says VOTER FRAUD In Nevada" on YouTube https://t.co/Cz2QwDNnWL — Mary Mendonca Raymond (@MaryRay42617188) November 8, 2020
And this:
WE CALL THIS “EVIDENCE.” https://t.co/esj7nNsGLr — Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) November 7, 2020
And this:
Oh so it’s baseless fraud claims you said I thought.. how about people who have been dead for years voting in Nevada and Michigan you total frauds! I was starting to think you were a legit source but your just another garbage so called media source.. subscription cancelled! pic.twitter.com/SIVBiiDgut — Tom Nappi (@TheRealTomNappi) November 6, 2020
And this:
And go here:
https://rumble.com/vazkmc-dead-people-cant-vote-nevada-conference-8-nov.html
And from Newsweek:
The Trump campaign announced they are filing a lawsuit to stop the vote count in Nevada, alleging that up to 10,000 people voted fraudulently by mail. “We firmly believe that there are many voters in this group of mail-in people that are not proper voters,” former Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt said in a news conference this morning. “We are also confident that there are thousands of people whose votes have been counted that have moved out of Clark County during the pandemic.” Laxalt also claimed that there have been dead voters counted throughout the state, and that some voters received up to 18 ballots at their homes. The campaign announced they are filing a lawsuit in a federal district court in Las Vegas to “stop the counting of improper votes” due to alleged irregularities. “It is unacceptable in this country to have illegal votes counted,” said Former Acting Director of the Office of National Intelligence Richard Grenell. So far, the Trump campaign has claimed multiple counts of voter fraud throughout Michigan, Arizona, and Wisconsin that have all been debunked.
And from Fox News:


welovetrump--2020-11-09--Let The Purge Begin:  President Trump FIRES Mark Esper

The first of what I assume will be many firings ( and soon to be arrests ? )
has begun .
Secretary of Defense , Mark Esper , just got terminated by Trump .
President Donald Trump announced on Twitter Monday that he has fired Secretary of Defense Mark Esper , and that Christopher Miller , who serves as director of the National Counterterrorism Center , will become acting secretary “ effective immediately.
” Esper ’ s increasingly tense relationship with Trump led him to prepare a letter of resignation weeks ago , an attempt to fashion a graceful exit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President decided to fire him , several defense sources , including one senior defense official , told CNN .
Tensions between Esper and Trump also played out publicly and had been simmering long enough that the defense secretary had prepared a letter of resignation weeks ago , aware that the President could fire him by tweet at any time .
Esper had been on shaky ground with the White House for months , a rift that deepened after he said in June that he did not support using active-duty troops to quell the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the death of George Floyd at the hands of police .
Esper also said military forces should be used in a law enforcement role only as a last resort .
His remarks from the Pentagon briefing room were seen by many as an effort to distance himself from Trump ’ s threats to deploy the military to enforce order on American city streets and went over poorly at the White House , multiple people familiar with the matter said .
According to multiple administration officials , White House sentiment about Esper had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both Trump and national security adviser Robert O ’ Brien viewing him as not entirely committed to the President ’ s vision for the military .
For months , Trump and O ’ Brien had been frustrated by Esper ’ s tendency to avoid offering a full-throated defense of the President or his policies , the administration officials said .
One administration source told CNN that Trump had no respect for Esper , leaving the defense secretary with little influence and little choice but to take his lead from Secretary of State Mike @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to mock his defense chief ’ s derisive nickname of “ Yesper ” during a news conference in August , a moniker bestowed upon Esper by defense officials who believed he did not go far enough in standing up to the President ’ s more controversial decisions .
Privately , Trump had expressed frustrations about Esper for months , venting about him at length during a trip to Camp David earlier this year , according to multiple sources .
The Pentagon did not immediately respond to CNBC ’ s request for comment .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to accept the results of the U.S Presidential Election and on the heels of an NBC News report that Esper had prepped his resignation letter , bracing for an inevitable termination from the Trump administration .
In an extraordinary break with Trump , Esper told reporters in June that he did not support the invoking the Insurrection Act , a law from 1807 that would allow Trump to deploy active-duty U.S. troops to respond to civil unrest stemming from protests against police brutality across the country .
“ I say this not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a former soldier and a former member of the National Guard , the option to use active-duty forces in a law enforcement role should only be used as a matter of last resort , and only in the most urgent and dire situations .
We are not in one of those situations now , ” Esper said .
“ I do not support invoking the Insurrection Act , ” he added .
Hours later , White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said Trump has the “ sole authority ” to move forward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the president was peeved by Esper ’ s comments at the Pentagon , McEnany gave a lukewarm response .

The first of what I assume will be many firings (and soon to be arrests?) has begun.
Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, just got terminated by Trump.
Take a look:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325859406349799424
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325859407620689922
From CNN:
President Donald Trump announced on Twitter Monday that he has fired Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, and that Christopher Miller, who serves as director of the National Counterterrorism Center, will become acting secretary “effective immediately.”
Esper’s increasingly tense relationship with Trump led him to prepare a letter of resignation weeks ago, an attempt to fashion a graceful exit in the widely expected event that the President decided to fire him, several defense sources, including one senior defense official, told CNN.
Tensions between Esper and Trump also played out publicly and had been simmering long enough that the defense secretary had prepared a letter of resignation weeks ago, aware that the President could fire him by tweet at any time.
Esper had been on shaky ground with the White House for months, a rift that deepened after he said in June that he did not support using active-duty troops to quell the large-scale protests across the United States triggered by the death of George Floyd at the hands of police. Esper also said military forces should be used in a law enforcement role only as a last resort.
His remarks from the Pentagon briefing room were seen by many as an effort to distance himself from Trump’s threats to deploy the military to enforce order on American city streets and went over poorly at the White House, multiple people familiar with the matter said.
According to multiple administration officials, White House sentiment about Esper had been souring for some time, with both Trump and national security adviser Robert O’Brien viewing him as not entirely committed to the President’s vision for the military.
For months, Trump and O’Brien had been frustrated by Esper’s tendency to avoid offering a full-throated defense of the President or his policies, the administration officials said.
One administration source told CNN that Trump had no respect for Esper, leaving the defense secretary with little influence and little choice but to take his lead from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
Trump went as far as to mock his defense chief’s derisive nickname of “Yesper” during a news conference in August, a moniker bestowed upon Esper by defense officials who believed he did not go far enough in standing up to the President’s more controversial decisions.
Privately, Trump had expressed frustrations about Esper for months, venting about him at length during a trip to Camp David earlier this year, according to multiple sources.


welovetrump--2020-11-09--Kavanaugh, Roberts, And Barrett Were All Attorneys Representing Bush In Bush Vs. Gore

Most of you remember Bush vs. Gore in 2000 right ?
Just to give you a recap the 2000 election between Bush vs. Gore was decided by United States Supreme Court and ultimately sided with George Bush on a recount dispute in Florida .
An unknown fact is that Chief Supreme Court Justice John Roberts , Justices Brett Kavanaugh , and Amy Coney Barrett were all Bush ’ s attorneys .
Trump has nominated two of the three current Justices who were on Bush ’ s legal team during the 2000 election .
See what CNN had to share about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , will be one of three current Supreme Court justices who assisted the legal team of then-Texas Gov .
George W. Bush in the Florida ballot-recount battle that came down to a single vote at the Supreme Court .
The court ’ s December 12 , 2000 , decision cutting off Florida recounts tore apart the justices and the nation , and the case hovers in the air today as America approaches the November 3 presidential election .
Other current justices benefited from the decision giving Bush the White House over Vice President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bush appointees to the bench .
Conversely , a pending judgeship for one of the current members was derailed by Bush v. Gore — temporarily .
The Washington Post reported this before Barret ’ s confirmation : Amy Coney Barrett was just three years out of law school , a 28-year-old associate at a boutique Washington law firm , when she was dispatched to Florida to help George W. Bush ’ s legal team rescue thousands of Republican absentee ballots .
At issue were thousands of absentee ballot request forms in Martin County @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , home of the notorious “ butterfly ballot ” — that had missing voter registration information .
As both parties brace for the possibility of another contested election that Trump has suggested could go to the high court , the previously unreported role of his Supreme Court nominee in the absentee ballot fight is more than a historical footnote .
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh also played a role in Bush v. Gore — meaning that if Barrett is confirmed , three of the nine justices will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only presidential contest to be decided by the high court .
“ Here we are , two decades after Bush v. Gore , and it ’ s as if it was yesterday , ” said Daniel Smith , a University of Florida political science professor .
“ It divided the nation 20 years ago , and it ’ s amazing how it continues to be a specter in national politics.
” NATIONAL POLL : Should Nancy Pelosi Be Removed From Office ?
Trump is always two steps ahead of the Democrats .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like but the reality is Trump is in the driver ’ s seat in this election .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
7,880 views
Trump is literally playing 4-d chess.
Most of you remember Bush vs. Gore in 2000 right?
Just to give you a recap the 2000 election between Bush vs. Gore was decided by United States Supreme Court and ultimately sided with George Bush on a recount dispute in Florida.
An unknown fact is that Chief Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, Justices Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett were all Bush’s attorneys.
https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1325796204547072001
BREAKING REPORT: Three CURRENT SUPREME COURT JUSTICES were on the Bush legal team from the 2000 Election, Chief Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett… — Chuck Callesto (@ChuckCallesto) November 9, 2020
Reminder – should #Election2020 go to the Supreme Court – three of the current justices were involved in the 2000 Bush V Gore litigation twenty years ago – John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — Suzanne Lynch (@suzannelynch1) November 5, 2020
Speaker Pelosi says that all three Supreme Court justices appointed by Trump should recuse themselves from cases tied to potential election disputes because they have a conflict of interest. "I don't trust the Supreme Court one bit." https://t.co/f6aygUOXWi — Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) November 2, 2020
Trump has nominated two of the three current Justices who were on Bush’s legal team during the 2000 election.
See what CNN had to share about the story:
Judge Amy Coney Barrett, will be one of three current Supreme Court justices who assisted the legal team of then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush in the Florida ballot-recount battle that came down to a single vote at the Supreme Court. The court’s December 12, 2000, decision cutting off Florida recounts tore apart the justices and the nation, and the case hovers in the air today as America approaches the November 3 presidential election. Other current justices benefited from the decision giving Bush the White House over Vice President Al Gore, as they eventually became Bush appointees to the bench. Conversely, a pending judgeship for one of the current members was derailed by Bush v. Gore — temporarily.
Twenty years ago, three young lawyers joined the GOP legal army in Florida for the Bush/Gore recount battle. They’re known today as Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts. https://t.co/hoKta3PYoz — Dan Diamond (@ddiamond) November 6, 2020
The Washington Post reported this before Barret’s confirmation:
PRAYER CHAIN FOR TRUMP: Please add your name and a prayer to support our President! Amy Coney Barrett was just three years out of law school, a 28-year-old associate at a boutique Washington law firm, when she was dispatched to Florida to help George W. Bush’s legal team rescue thousands of Republican absentee ballots. At issue were thousands of absentee ballot request forms in Martin County — just north of Palm Beach County, home of the notorious “butterfly ballot” — that had missing voter registration information. As both parties brace for the possibility of another contested election that Trump has suggested could go to the high court, the previously unreported role of his Supreme Court nominee in the absentee ballot fight is more than a historical footnote. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh also played a role in Bush v. Gore — meaning that if Barrett is confirmed, three of the nine justices will have participated in litigation related to the only presidential contest to be decided by the high court. “Here we are, two decades after Bush v. Gore, and it’s as if it was yesterday,” said Daniel Smith, a University of Florida political science professor. “It divided the nation 20 years ago, and it’s amazing how it continues to be a specter in national politics.”
Trump is always two steps ahead of the Democrats.
The media can paint the situation however they like but the reality is Trump is in the driver’s seat in this election.


welovetrump--2020-11-09--Giuliani Says There is Enough Evidence to Overturn the Pennsylvania Election Results

The Washington Examiner has more on this unfolding story : In a Sunday interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo , Giuliani said the lawsuits being filed by the Trump campaign might reveal that up to 900,000 invalid ballots were cast in the state of Pennsylvania , a key election swing state several news outlets projected presumptive President-elect Joe Biden would win .
`` Do you believe that you have enough to actually change the fate of the election ? ''
Bartiromo asked .
`` Well , I think we have enough to change Pennsylvania .
The Pennsylvania election was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` We have people that observed people being pushed out of the polling place .
We have people who were suggested to vote the other way and shown how to do it .
I 'm giving you the big picture . ''
Giuliani described details of its investigation in Pennsylvania , which may translate to new lawsuits this week , as early as Monday .
He alleged Republican observers in Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , were `` kept out of the room or kept away from the room '' for 24-hours where mail-in ballots @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were counted during that time period .
`` Even though we went to court , and we were allowed to move 6 feet closer , the Democrat-machine people moved the counting place six feet further away .
This is documented on videotape .
There are upwards of 50 witnesses , '' Giuliani said , which would be the subject of a Monday civil rights lawsuit on Monday .
Giuliani said the Trump team was also looking into whether ballots were cast in the name of people who are already dead and if ballots @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have evidence now , from not only the Post Office but from others , that there was back-dating .
I can only tell you right now that that amounts to about 2,000 or 3,000 votes , '' Giuliani said .

The Washington Examiner has more on this unfolding story:
In a Sunday interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Giuliani said the lawsuits being filed by the Trump campaign might reveal that up to 900,000 invalid ballots were cast in the state of Pennsylvania, a key election swing state several news outlets projected presumptive President-elect Joe Biden would win. "Do you believe that you have enough to actually change the fate of the election?" Bartiromo asked.
"Well, I think we have enough to change Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania election was a disaster," Giuliani said. "We have people that observed people being pushed out of the polling place. We have people who were suggested to vote the other way and shown how to do it. I'm giving you the big picture."
Giuliani described details of its investigation in Pennsylvania, which may translate to new lawsuits this week, as early as Monday. He alleged Republican observers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, were "kept out of the room or kept away from the room" for 24-hours where mail-in ballots were counted, adding that 135,000 ballots were counted during that time period.
"Even though we went to court, and we were allowed to move 6 feet closer, the Democrat-machine people moved the counting place six feet further away. This is documented on videotape. There are upwards of 50 witnesses," Giuliani said, which would be the subject of a Monday civil rights lawsuit on Monday.
Giuliani said the Trump team was also looking into whether ballots were cast in the name of people who are already dead and if ballots were "back-dated."
"We have evidence now, from not only the Post Office but from others, that there was back-dating. I can only tell you right now that that amounts to about 2,000 or 3,000 votes," Giuliani said.