welovetrump--2020-03-02--Sandmann Strikes Back: Files 5 More Lawsuits Against Media Companies

After these lawsuits , hopefully the media will think twice before rushing to judgement on a story .
The impact of Sandmann 's cases will hopefully protect other conservatives from being falsely villainized by the left-wing media .
At 16 years old , Sandmann 's life was turned upside down by the viral nature of the news story .
While Sandmann is respected at school , in his community , and by his friends and family , the story has damaged his reputation and at times even threatened his safety .
The Daily Wire has more insight into the long-term @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media treatment around him : “ CNN was probably more vicious in its direct attacks on Nicholas than The Washington Post .
And CNN goes into millions of individuals ’ homes , ” Wood told Fox News ’ Mark Levin last year .
“ CNN couldn ’ t resist the idea that here ’ s a guy with a young boy , with that Make America Great Again cap on .
So they go after him.
” “ They really went after Nicholas with the idea that he was part of a mob @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , yelling racist slurs at the Black Hebrew Israelites .
Totally false , ” Wood continued .
“ Now you say you ’ ve seen the tape ; if you took the time to look at the full context of what happened that day , Nicholas Sandmann did absolutely nothing wrong .
He was , as I ’ ve said to others , he was the only adult in the room.
” In an interview on Fox News last year , McMurtry told anchor Sandra Smith , “ Well , what CNN ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ And what we believe their reporting was in this circumstance was lies first , cover up second , and facts not yet determined by that organization .
So the difference between this lawsuit and the other lawsuit that we have filed is that CNN is a very significant media organization with a much broader reach than , say , the Washington Post .
It has Twitter followers of 41 million people .
It published four videos .
Nine online articles that were tweeted out .
So that ’ s millions and millions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and falsehoods that CNN spread.
” “ Well , we ’ ve talked about the impact on Nicholas Sandmann a number of times and it — it is significant , ” McMurtry continued .
“ Nicholas Sandmann was a 16-year-old man who had a perfect reputation .
He was loved by his parents , respected at his school , and had many good friends at Covington Catholic High School .
So he was a person that was doing very well in life , and due to his strong character , he still is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now been determined by the lies issued by CNN .
So the facts were not first , the lies were .
”

After these lawsuits, hopefully the media will think twice before rushing to judgement on a story.
The impact of Sandmann's cases will hopefully protect other conservatives from being falsely villainized by the left-wing media.
At 16 years old, Sandmann's life was turned upside down by the viral nature of the news story.
While Sandmann is respected at school, in his community, and by his friends and family, the story has damaged his reputation and at times even threatened his safety.
The Daily Wire has more insight into the long-term impact of Sandmann's case against the media treatment around him:
“CNN was probably more vicious in its direct attacks on Nicholas than The Washington Post. And CNN goes into millions of individuals’ homes,” Wood told Fox News’ Mark Levin last year. “CNN couldn’t resist the idea that here’s a guy with a young boy, with that Make America Great Again cap on. So they go after him.”
“They really went after Nicholas with the idea that he was part of a mob that was attacking the Black Hebrew Israelites, yelling racist slurs at the Black Hebrew Israelites. Totally false,” Wood continued. “Now you say you’ve seen the tape; if you took the time to look at the full context of what happened that day, Nicholas Sandmann did absolutely nothing wrong. He was, as I’ve said to others, he was the only adult in the room.”
In an interview on Fox News last year, McMurtry told anchor Sandra Smith, “Well, what CNN’s tagline is is ‘facts first.’ And what we believe their reporting was in this circumstance was lies first, cover up second, and facts not yet determined by that organization. So the difference between this lawsuit and the other lawsuit that we have filed is that CNN is a very significant media organization with a much broader reach than, say, the Washington Post. It has Twitter followers of 41 million people. It published four videos. Nine online articles that were tweeted out. So that’s millions and millions and millions of repetitions of the lies and falsehoods that CNN spread.”
“Well, we’ve talked about the impact on Nicholas Sandmann a number of times and it — it is significant,” McMurtry continued. “Nicholas Sandmann was a 16-year-old man who had a perfect reputation. He was loved by his parents, respected at his school, and had many good friends at Covington Catholic High School. So he was a person that was doing very well in life, and due to his strong character, he still is. But nevertheless, his character has now been determined by the lies issued by CNN. So the facts were not first, the lies were.”


welovetrump--2020-03-02--Defiant Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Doubles Down: Refuses to Cooperate with ICE Despite Sex Assault

Defiant Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Doubles Down: Refuses to Cooperate with ICE Despite Sex Assault Case

It ’ s well known that Chicago is a corrupt city .
We just didn ’ t know how cold @ @ @ @ @ behave .
Defiant Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot held a press conference where she made this @ @ @ @ @ ’ re a welcoming city , we ’ re a sanctuary city , Chicago police @ @ @ @ @ ICE on any immigration related business.
” Well… this statement comes after outrage over the @ @ @ @ @ year-old girl inside a McDonald ’ s bathroom .
The perpetrator was Christopher Puente , @ @ @ @ @ by ICE .
That ’ s right : the mayor of Chicago is still refusing @ @ @ @ @ an assault on one of our most innocent and helpless citizens .
Why do liberals @ @ @ @ @ break the law over their own citizens ?
More details on this developing case can @ @ @ @

It’s well known that Chicago is a corrupt city.
We just didn’t know how cold its leaders could appear to behave.
Defiant Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot held a press conference where she made this eye-popping statement: “We’re a welcoming city, we’re a sanctuary city, Chicago police department will not co-operate with ICE on any immigration related business.”
The context?
Well… this statement comes after outrage over the sexual assault of a 3 year-old girl inside a McDonald’s bathroom.
The perpetrator was Christopher Puente, who had previously been deported by ICE.
That’s right: the mayor of Chicago is still refusing to cooperate with ICE after an assault on one of our most innocent and helpless citizens.
Why do liberals continue to prioritize those who break the law over their own citizens?
More details on this developing case can be viewed below:


welovetrump--2020-03-03--Denver Councilwoman Candi CdeBaca Cheers Using Coronavirus on Trump Supporters; Faces Calls to Resig

Denver Councilwoman Candi CdeBaca Cheers Using Coronavirus on Trump Supporters; Faces Calls to Resign

Did Denver Democrat Candi CdeBaca just endorse using coronavirus as a bioweapon against supporters of the president ?
Well… based @ @ @ @ @ , it appears as though she “ cheers ” on the idea .
CdeBaca , @ @ @ @ @ a post suggesting that coronavirus should be spread and used against Trump supporters .
She @ @ @ @ @ suggesting that she would laugh at Trump supporters catching the virus .
She also included @ @ @ @ @ , which some users understood as an endorsement .

Did Denver Democrat Candi CdeBaca just endorse using coronavirus as a bioweapon against supporters of the president?
Well… based on her government Twitter account, it appears as though she “cheers” on the idea.
CdeBaca, a Denver councilwoman, re-tweeted a post suggesting that coronavirus should be spread and used against Trump supporters.
In her re-tweet, CdeBaca wrote “#Solidarity Yaaaas!!”
She also included a few emojis suggesting that she would laugh at Trump supporters catching the virus. She also included the “ok” symbol, which some users understood as an endorsement.
See CdeBaca’s tone-deaf tweet below:


welovetrump--2020-03-03--Red Wave Growing: Videos Show Massive Overflow for Trump Charlotte Rally

The Bojangles ’ Coliseum was packed to capacity and thousands were in overflow , watching the rally outside on giant @ @ @ @ @ emerging , showing just how big the crowd was .
There was a momentary question @ @ @ @ @ media ’ s fear-mongering around the coronavirus impact attendance at Trump rallies ?
Not if @ @ @ @ @ have anything to say about it !
Take a look at the lines hours before @ @ @ @

Enthusiasm. Is. GROWING.
Charlotte, North Carolina showed up big time for President Trump.
The Bojangles’ Coliseum was packed to capacity and thousands were in overflow, watching the rally outside on giant screens.
Video clips are emerging, showing just how big the crowd was.
There was a momentary question in the air… Will the media’s fear-mongering around the coronavirus impact attendance at Trump rallies?
Not if the people of North Carolina have anything to say about it!
Take a look at the lines hours before the rally began!


welovetrump--2020-03-03--Political Pope Calls for Global Wealth Redistribution, Says Trump Tax Cuts a “Structure of Sin”

It appears to be a classic case of do as I say but not as I do .
The statements were aimed at the United Nations as he urged them to create a solution that realizes a `` legitimate redistribution '' of wealth .
This is one of the most economically charged statements made by the pope .
MSNBC has more on the pope 's controversial statements : Pope Francis on Friday called on United Nations leaders to take better care of the poor and advocated for a “ legitimate redistribution ” of wealth .
“ Equitable economic and social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific and technical abilities with an unfailing commitment to solidarity ” with the poor , the Pope said , in addition to a new spirit of generosity , according to a transcript published by Vatican Radio .
In one of the most economically liberal statements made by any Pope , Francis called for “ the legitimate redistribution of economic benefits by the State , as well as indispensable cooperation between the private sector and civil society.
” Francis criticized global wealth inequality and the growing level of poverty and hunger .
“ An @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be satisfied with current results and to press forward , ” he said .
“ Much more needs to be achieved , since an important part of humanity does not share in the benefits of progress and is in fact relegated to the status of second-class citizens.
” While we can all agree that more can be done to help the poor , we should acknowledge that the so-called `` wealth gap '' appears to be an exaggeration .
Most people live `` in the middle . ''
It 's not as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ super wealthy people , then a huge number of immensely poor people .
Rather , the majority of citizens globally are neither very rich nor very poor .
They 're right in the middle .

It appears to be a classic case of do as I say but not as I do.
The statements were aimed at the United Nations as he urged them to create a solution that realizes a "legitimate redistribution" of wealth.
This is one of the most economically charged statements made by the pope.
MSNBC has more on the pope's controversial statements:
Pope Francis on Friday called on United Nations leaders to take better care of the poor and advocated for a “legitimate redistribution” of wealth.
“Equitable economic and social progress can only be attained by joining scientific and technical abilities with an unfailing commitment to solidarity” with the poor, the Pope said, in addition to a new spirit of generosity, according to a transcript published by Vatican Radio.
In one of the most economically liberal statements made by any Pope, Francis called for “the legitimate redistribution of economic benefits by the State, as well as indispensable cooperation between the private sector and civil society.”
Francis criticized global wealth inequality and the growing level of poverty and hunger.
“An essential principle of management is the refusal to be satisfied with current results and to press forward,” he said. “Much more needs to be achieved, since an important part of humanity does not share in the benefits of progress and is in fact relegated to the status of second-class citizens.”
While we can all agree that more can be done to help the poor, we should acknowledge that the so-called "wealth gap" appears to be an exaggeration.
Most people live "in the middle." It's not as though there's a huge number of super wealthy people, then a huge number of immensely poor people.
Rather, the majority of citizens globally are neither very rich nor very poor. They're right in the middle.


welovetrump--2020-03-03--Trump Administration: No Green Cards for Those Abusing Welfare System

Some are calling the new public rule charge a `` tax cut in disguise . ''
By eliminating welfare abuse and fraud , this will save $ 54.7 billion for legal American taxpayers .
The `` public charge '' has already been part of U.S. immigration law .
However , there has n't been a standard to define what `` self-suficiency '' is .
Now , the administration is cracking down on immigrants who have received 1 or more welfare benefits in a 1-year or 36 month period .
This includes food stamps , Medicaid , and Supplemental Security Income @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the public charge : The Trump administration on Monday is implementing the long-awaited “ public charge ” rule that restricts green cards for immigrants deemed likely to be reliant on welfare — a rule furiously opposed by Democrats , but one that officials argue will protect taxpayers and align with American principles .
“ It ’ s consistent with our law for over 140 years , it 's a core American value of self-sufficiency , and it ’ s just plain old logic — what country wants to bring welfare problems into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to do that , ” acting Deputy Homeland Security Secretary Ken Cuccinelli told Fox News ahead of the rule going into effect .
`` We ’ re happy to open our doors to people from all over the world but we expect them to stand on their own two feet . ''
The Trump administration had published the rule in August , scheduled to go into effect in October , but it was blocked amid a series of court challenges .
The Supreme Court lifted preliminary injunctions in January in a 5-4 vote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a separate injunction for the state of Illinois on Friday , allowing the rule to go into effect across the country on Monday .
`` This final rule will protect hardworking American taxpayers , safeguard welfare programs for truly needy Americans , reduce the Federal deficit , and re-establish the fundamental legal principle that newcomers to our society should be financially self-reliant and not dependent on the largess of United States taxpayers , '' White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said in a statement Friday .
While a `` public charge '' standard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and immigrants have regularly had to provide documents to demonstrate self-sufficiency , the standard has been lacking a formal statutory definition .
Officials have been working on interim guidance published in 1999 , but have been without a final rule .
The new rule defines a “ public charge ” as an immigrant who received one or more designated benefits for more than 12 months in a 36-month period .
Those benefits that would be designated included Supplemental Security Income ( SSI ) , Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ( TANF ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ( SNAP ) , commonly known as food stamps .
The rule expands the number of benefits that can be considered from interim guidance issued in 1999 .
As he has said many times on the campaign trail , `` There is dignity in work . ''
The American dream is one of hard work and success , not laziness and abuse !

Some are calling the new public rule charge a "tax cut in disguise."
By eliminating welfare abuse and fraud, this will save $54.7 billion for legal American taxpayers.
The "public charge" has already been part of U.S. immigration law.
However, there hasn't been a standard to define what "self-suficiency" is.
Now, the administration is cracking down on immigrants who have received 1 or more welfare benefits in a 1-year or 36 month period. This includes food stamps, Medicaid, and Supplemental Security Income.
Fox News outlines the new implementation of the public charge:
The Trump administration on Monday is implementing the long-awaited “public charge” rule that restricts green cards for immigrants deemed likely to be reliant on welfare — a rule furiously opposed by Democrats, but one that officials argue will protect taxpayers and align with American principles.
“It’s consistent with our law for over 140 years, it's a core American value of self-sufficiency, and it’s just plain old logic — what country wants to bring welfare problems into its society? We don't want to do that,” acting Deputy Homeland Security Secretary Ken Cuccinelli told Fox News ahead of the rule going into effect. "We’re happy to open our doors to people from all over the world but we expect them to stand on their own two feet."
The Trump administration had published the rule in August, scheduled to go into effect in October, but it was blocked amid a series of court challenges. The Supreme Court lifted preliminary injunctions in January in a 5-4 vote. It ruled the same way on a separate injunction for the state of Illinois on Friday, allowing the rule to go into effect across the country on Monday.
"This final rule will protect hardworking American taxpayers, safeguard welfare programs for truly needy Americans, reduce the Federal deficit, and re-establish the fundamental legal principle that newcomers to our society should be financially self-reliant and not dependent on the largess of United States taxpayers," White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said in a statement Friday.
While a "public charge" standard is already part of U.S. immigration law, and immigrants have regularly had to provide documents to demonstrate self-sufficiency, the standard has been lacking a formal statutory definition. Officials have been working on interim guidance published in 1999, but have been without a final rule.
The new rule defines a “public charge” as an immigrant who received one or more designated benefits for more than 12 months in a 36-month period. Those benefits that would be designated included Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), as well as most forms of Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps. The rule expands the number of benefits that can be considered from interim guidance issued in 1999.
Trump is making self-sufficiency great again!
As he has said many times on the campaign trail, "There is dignity in work."
The American dream is one of hard work and success, not laziness and abuse!


welovetrump--2020-03-04--Black Pastor Calls Out “Woke” Culture and Planned Parenthood, Tells The Truth About Margaret Sanger

Black Pastor Calls Out “Woke” Culture and Planned Parenthood, Tells The Truth About Margaret Sanger and Abortion

I was not familiar with Bishop Wooden before watching this video , but I sure am now !
And all @ @ @ @ @ wow ” !
He brings the truth and he ’ s not afraid to ruffle @ @ @ @ @ sermon against so-called “ woke ” churches who are silent on abortion and the absolute @ @ @ @ @ black community :

Preach on Pastor!
I was not familiar with Bishop Wooden before watching this video, but I sure am now!
And all I can say is “wow”!
He brings the truth and he’s not afraid to ruffle feathers.
Check out his sermon against so-called “woke” churches who are silent on abortion and the absolute devestation it causes to the black community:


welovetrump--2020-03-05--Pelosi Delayed Coronavirus Funding to Run Attack Ads Against Republicans, House Minority Leader Kevi

Pelosi Delayed Coronavirus Funding to Run Attack Ads Against Republicans, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy Claims

Are we understanding this correctly ?
The House of Representatives could have passed a bill sooner that would provide more funding to fight the coronavirus .
But according to Kevin McCarthy , Nancy Pelosi held up the bill so that the DCCC could play politics and accuse Republicans of inaction .
If this is true ... it 's not a good look for Pelosi .
The Hill has more details on McCarthy 's claims : House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy ( R-Calif. ) on Tuesday blasted the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee ( DCCC ) for running ads against Republican House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ response to the coronavirus , accusing Democrats of playing politics as the U.S. faces a potential health crisis .
The California Republican argued that Speaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-Calif. ) should have brought a supplemental funding bill to address the looming pandemic to the floor last week .
He added that Republicans don ’ t have control of the floor and , therefore , should not be subjected to attacks the matter .
“ We are not in the majority , we can not determine the floor so Speaker Pelosi left and had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we hope we 're able to bring it up , ” he told reporters at a press conference on Tuesday .
“ And why now is ... the DCCC running ads against seven Republicans on something they could not vote on ? ''
he added .
`` Are they playing politics and holding the money up so their political arm can attack Republicans on this issue ?
Can they for one time put people before politics ?
” McCarthy also called on Pelosi to issue an apology and for the DCCC to refrain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ GOP lawmakers are working to make sure the resources needed to combat the virus from spreading are available .
“ I think they owe the American public an apology .
I think the Speaker needs to apologize , Cheri Bustos needs to take those ads down and stop playing politics with this .
America is nervous , we 've been preparing for years in advance , ” he said , referring to the DCCC chairwoman , a Democratic representative from Illinois .
“ We 've got to make sure we have all the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the floor .
You 've seen Republicans in every single meeting , trying to work through this to get this done now .
You do not see ads coming out for Republicans , but we do see from the Democratic Congressional Committee , '' he added .
`` I do n't believe anybody should be a part of [ these ] attacks ... it 's not a partisan issue .
”

Are we understanding this correctly?
The House of Representatives could have passed a bill sooner that would provide more funding to fight the coronavirus.
But according to Kevin McCarthy, Nancy Pelosi held up the bill so that the DCCC could play politics and accuse Republicans of inaction.
If this is true... it's not a good look for Pelosi.
The Hill has more details on McCarthy's claims:
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Tuesday blasted the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) for running ads against Republican House members over the Trump administration’s response to the coronavirus, accusing Democrats of playing politics as the U.S. faces a potential health crisis.
The California Republican argued that Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) should have brought a supplemental funding bill to address the looming pandemic to the floor last week. He added that Republicans don’t have control of the floor and, therefore, should not be subjected to attacks the matter.
“We are not in the majority, we cannot determine the floor so Speaker Pelosi left and had us leave Congress. This week, we hope we're able to bring it up,” he told reporters at a press conference on Tuesday.
“And why now is ... the DCCC running ads against seven Republicans on something they could not vote on?" he added. "Are they playing politics and holding the money up so their political arm can attack Republicans on this issue? Can they for one time put people before politics?”
McCarthy also called on Pelosi to issue an apology and for the DCCC to refrain from running the ads, adding that GOP lawmakers are working to make sure the resources needed to combat the virus from spreading are available.
“I think they owe the American public an apology. I think the Speaker needs to apologize, Cheri Bustos needs to take those ads down and stop playing politics with this. America is nervous, we've been preparing for years in advance,” he said, referring to the DCCC chairwoman, a Democratic representative from Illinois.
“We've got to make sure we have all the needed resources there so bring the bill to the floor. You've seen Republicans in every single meeting, trying to work through this to get this done now. You do not see ads coming out for Republicans, but we do see from the Democratic Congressional Committee," he added. "I don't believe anybody should be a part of [these] attacks ... it's not a partisan issue.”


welovetrump--2020-03-05--Schumer Doubles Down on Threatening Comments Towards Kavanaugh, Gorsuch Before Claiming He Misspoke

McConnell was among the first to condemn Schumer , pointing out that instead of apologizing he doubled-down on his comments .
Schumer responded to McConnell 's critique , claiming that Republicans are `` manufacturing outrage over these comments . ''
The Hill has more on the exchange between the Senate Majority Leader and Minority Leader : McConnell called the comments `` astonishingly , astonishingly reckless and ... irresponsible . ''
He added that the subsequent explanation was an attempt to `` gaslight the entire country and stated that he was actually threatening fellow senators , as though that would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leader appearing to threaten or incite violence on the steps of the Supreme Court could literally be a matter of deadly seriousness .
So I fully anticipate our colleague would quickly withdraw his comments and apologize .
...
Instead , our colleague doubled down .
Doubled down , '' McConnell added .
Schumer knocked McConnell in a subsequent speech , saying his speech had a `` glaring omission . ''
`` He did not mention what the rally yesterday , my speech , or the case before the court was about , '' @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` A women 's constitutional right to choose .
To the women of America , what we 're talking about here , what I am fighting for here , is your right to choose . ''
But he also offered a caveat while accusing Republicans of `` manufacturing outrage . ''
Chief Justice John Roberts weighed in and chastised the Senate Minority Leader .
In a rare and unusual move , the Chief Justice issued a written statement late Wednesday night .
He wrote : `` Statements of this sort from the highest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they are dangerous . ''
Roberts also added , `` All members of the Court will continue to do their job , without fear or favor , from whatever quarter . ''
Instead of issuing a geniune apology , Schumer claimed that Chief Justice Roberts intentionally misrepresented his words , according to NBC News : Schumer 's office later issued a second statement on Wednesday in which the senator criticized Roberts .
`` For Justice Roberts to follow the right wing 's deliberate misinterpretation of what Sen. Schumer said , while remaining @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Ginsburg last week , shows Justice Roberts does not just call balls and strikes , '' said Schumer spokesman Justin Goodman , referring to Trump 's criticism of the two liberal justices and his call for them not to participate in any rulings involving him .
There are many reasons he 's called `` Cryin ' Chuck Schumer . ''
Pretending and crying to be a victim is one of them !

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer made threatening comments towards Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
The Supreme Court is deliberating its first case related to abortion since Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were appointed as justices.
In a speech to radical pro-abortion activists, Schumer said that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh would “pay the price” if they voted against his wishes.
“You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions,” Schumer added.
Given that Supreme Court justices are lifetime appointments that don’t require re-election, many fear that Schumer’s “pay the price” comments were “dog whistles” to pro-abortion activists.
See Schumer’s disgraceful comments below:


welovetrump--2020-03-05--Fox News Allows Debate Cheater Donna Brazile to Tell RNC Chair: “Ronna, Go to Hell”

Many commentators are agitated that Fox News allowed Brazile to come back that same day for Super Tuesday analysis .
Within 24 hours of cursing out the GOP chairwoman , Brazile appeared on the network at least 3 separate times .
Some are asking : would n't a conservative analyst who said the exact same thing towards the DNC chair be immediately taken off the air or put on probation ?
Daniel John Sobieski of the American Thinker is a former editorial writer for Investor 's Business Daily who found Fox News ' lack of a response ... odd : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leader and newly minted Fox News contributor who leaked debate questions to Hillary Clinton , got away with swearing at RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel on Tuesday morning , instead of being pulled from the air immediately , as Fox would have cheerfully done to any conservative analyst who had similarly ranted before telling , say , the DNC Chair , to similarly `` go to Hell . ''
McDaniel had appeared earlier on America 's Newsroom and opined that perhaps the withdrawal of Amy Klobuchar and Pete Buttigieg and the support of Beto @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future Cabinet positions and other future considerations in exchange for their endorsements and conveniently all showing up together at Joe Biden 's rally before the crucial Texas primary .
McDaniel suggested , based on the 2016 nominating shenanigans , that perhaps the DNC was once again conspiring to deny Bernie Sanders its nomination for president .
This was the partisan analysis of a political operative in an election year , an opinion she was entitled to express , an opinion well grounded in the historical record .
This struck a nerve with Brazile @ @ @ @ @ @ @ McDaniel 's analysis , went off on a borderline incoherent rant that stunned newsroom co-hosts Ed Henry and Sandra Smith , who said nothing to correct the record or apologize to an equally stunned audience as Brazile went off the rails : Again , it is hard to imagine a GOP or conservative getting away with this vitriol .
Russian talking points ?
Really ?
Fox 's idea of analysis is to provide a forum for Brazile to cry , `` Russia , Russia , Russia '' ?
So impressed was Fox with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she was back in the evening for post-election analysis and on Fox and Friends the following morning .
This is typical for a Fox News that has been veering to the left of late , a recent example being Neil Cavuto 's rewriting of history when he agreed with guest A.B .
Stoddatd that Trump lost all his 2016 debates with `` cringe-worthy '' performances .
See responses on Twitter calling for Donna to be fired and for Fox News to take action .

Many commentators are agitated that Fox News allowed Brazile to come back that same day for Super Tuesday analysis.
Within 24 hours of cursing out the GOP chairwoman, Brazile appeared on the network at least 3 separate times.
Some are asking: wouldn't a conservative analyst who said the exact same thing towards the DNC chair be immediately taken off the air or put on probation?
Daniel John Sobieski of the American Thinker is a former editorial writer for Investor's Business Daily who found Fox News' lack of a response... odd:
Donna Brazile, the disgraced former DNC leader and newly minted Fox News contributor who leaked debate questions to Hillary Clinton, got away with swearing at RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel on Tuesday morning, instead of being pulled from the air immediately, as Fox would have cheerfully done to any conservative analyst who had similarly ranted before telling, say, the DNC Chair, to similarly "go to Hell."
McDaniel had appeared earlier on America's Newsroom and opined that perhaps the withdrawal of Amy Klobuchar and Pete Buttigieg and the support of Beto O'Rourke were part of deal-making that included future Cabinet positions and other future considerations in exchange for their endorsements and conveniently all showing up together at Joe Biden's rally before the crucial Texas primary. McDaniel suggested, based on the 2016 nominating shenanigans, that perhaps the DNC was once again conspiring to deny Bernie Sanders its nomination for president. This was the partisan analysis of a political operative in an election year, an opinion she was entitled to express, an opinion well grounded in the historical record.
This struck a nerve with Brazile, who, asked to comment on McDaniel's analysis, went off on a borderline incoherent rant that stunned newsroom co-hosts Ed Henry and Sandra Smith, who said nothing to correct the record or apologize to an equally stunned audience as Brazile went off the rails:
Again, it is hard to imagine a GOP or conservative getting away with this vitriol. Russian talking points? Really? Fox's idea of analysis is to provide a forum for Brazile to cry, "Russia, Russia, Russia"? So impressed was Fox with Brazile's eloquent and cogent analysis that she was back in the evening for post-election analysis and on Fox and Friends the following morning. This is typical for a Fox News that has been veering to the left of late, a recent example being Neil Cavuto's rewriting of history when he agreed with guest A.B. Stoddatd that Trump lost all his 2016 debates with "cringe-worthy" performances.
See responses on Twitter calling for Donna to be fired and for Fox News to take action.


welovetrump--2020-03-05--Trump Administration to Begin Withholding Federal Funds from Sanctuary Cities

Withholding millions in federal grants is just a part of the fight against sanctuary cities and states .
The Trump administration is also utilizing legal action to help protect American citizens .
According to Newsweek , federal appeals courts are challenging the ruling , but the Trump administration is standing its ground and going on the offense : Three federal appeals courts in Chicago , Philadelphia and San Francisco have upheld injunctions barring enforcement of at least some of the administration 's conditions on the funds .
In addition to the funding threats , the administration is now opening up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cities , filing lawsuits and issuing subpoenas in what Attorney General William Barr called part of a `` significant escalation '' in the fight against uncooperative jurisdictions .
The funds are typically utilized to support state local criminal justice efforts .
But if states do not go non-sancutary , then they will no longer be eligible for the grant , per the Federal Court ruling .
Brandon Judd of Fox News highlights how this policy will help protect American citizens : “ President Trump ’ s latest retaliation against his hometown ( New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the number one terrorist target in America , ” de Blasio said in a statement , “ all because we refuse to play by his arbitrary rules.
” Those so-called arbitrary rules are the literal law of the land , requirements specifically added by Congress for cities that want to receive Bryne grants , whether Mr. de Blasio likes it or not .
And the notion that a mayor who as a matter of policy refuses to hand over criminal illegal aliens to federal law enforcement — instead unleashing them to wreak @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suddenly pretend to care about the security of his city is quite frankly offensive .
Yet to Mr. de Blasio and his allies , President Trump ’ s efforts to enforce the law of the land and protect American lives amounts to “ retaliation.
” This is the essence of their position against the Trump administration ’ s policy .
They truly believe that they have the right to take federal money intended to help them enforce the law while simultaneously refusing to assist federal law enforcement .
They actually have the gall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safety while actively undermining public safety with their sanctuary policies .
In addition to highlighting the morally indefensible position of sanctuary jurisdictions and their supporters , the circuit court decision also highlights the importance of President Trump ’ s efforts to reshape the judiciary .
We have seen the lengths to which proponents of sanctuary cities are willing to go to maintain their state of lawlessness and protect their reckless practices .
We have seen that there are activist judges on various courts willing to support them .
And we have just seen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be our last line of defense against those who wish to replace the American Dream with American Anarchy .
Thank you , Mr. President , for staying true to your word !
It 's about time that our politicians put their own constituents first !

Withholding millions in federal grants is just a part of the fight against sanctuary cities and states.
The Trump administration is also utilizing legal action to help protect American citizens.
According to Newsweek, federal appeals courts are challenging the ruling, but the Trump administration is standing its ground and going on the offense:
In addition to the funding threats, the administration is now opening up new fronts in the battle against the cities, filing lawsuits and issuing subpoenas in what Attorney General William Barr called part of a "significant escalation" in the fight against uncooperative jurisdictions.
The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program dispenses $250 million per year.
The funds are typically utilized to support state local criminal justice efforts.
But if states do not go non-sancutary, then they will no longer be eligible for the grant, per the Federal Court ruling.
Brandon Judd of Fox News highlights how this policy will help protect American citizens:
“President Trump’s latest retaliation against his hometown (New York City) takes away security funding from the number one terrorist target in America,” de Blasio said in a statement, “all because we refuse to play by his arbitrary rules.”
Those so-called arbitrary rules are the literal law of the land, requirements specifically added by Congress for cities that want to receive Bryne grants, whether Mr. de Blasio likes it or not. And the notion that a mayor who as a matter of policy refuses to hand over criminal illegal aliens to federal law enforcement — instead unleashing them to wreak more havoc on law-abiding citizens — would suddenly pretend to care about the security of his city is quite frankly offensive.
Yet to Mr. de Blasio and his allies, President Trump’s efforts to enforce the law of the land and protect American lives amounts to “retaliation.” This is the essence of their position against the Trump administration’s policy. They truly believe that they have the right to take federal money intended to help them enforce the law while simultaneously refusing to assist federal law enforcement. They actually have the gall to demand federal money intended for public safety while actively undermining public safety with their sanctuary policies.
In addition to highlighting the morally indefensible position of sanctuary jurisdictions and their supporters, the circuit court decision also highlights the importance of President Trump’s efforts to reshape the judiciary.
We have seen the lengths to which proponents of sanctuary cities are willing to go to maintain their state of lawlessness and protect their reckless practices. We have seen that there are activist judges on various courts willing to support them. And we have just seen that sound, constitutionally-based legal judgments may be our last line of defense against those who wish to replace the American Dream with American Anarchy.


welovetrump--2020-03-05--FISA Abuse “Deep Dive” Begins: Lindsey Graham Conducting Closed-Door Depositions

We deserve accountability from leaders in our government .
Lindsey Graham 's investigation will help reduce the possibility of the Deep State attempting to interfere in the 2020 election .
Graham has stated that his investigation proceedings could potentially last for a few weeks .
Fox News has some insight on the questions that Graham wants to ask during these depositions : Sen. Lindsey Graham , R-S.C. , revealed key questions he has going into the Senate Judiciary Committee 's investigation of the initiation of the Russia probe and the FBI 's use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump campaign adviser Carter Page .
Graham 's investigation comes after the Justice Department Inspector General released a report detailing significant inaccuracies and omissions on the part of the FBI in their FISA warrant applications , misleading the court in the process .
A major aspect of the report exposed the degree to which the FBI had relied on the unverified dossier compiled by British ex-spy Christopher Steele as part of opposition research for Hillary Clinton 's campaign .
`` Now I want to know , what did McCabe and Comey know , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was unreliable ? ''
Graham told `` Sunday Morning Futures '' host Maria Bartiromo , referring to former FBI Director James Comey and former Acting Director Andrew McCabe .
Comey has insisted that he was not aware of what was going on at the time .
Graham mentioned that Steele 's primary sub-source had told the FBI that the information in the dossier was not credible .
The Senate Judiciary Committee chairman expressed doubt that this information did not reach the upper levels of the FBI .
“ I find it hard to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way up to Comey and McCabe , '' he said .
To get to the bottom of this , Graham said that he wants to begin his investigation by calling the four individuals who met with the sub-source to speak to the committee .
Graham said he also wanted to know who else was aware of the problems with the dossier , and when they found out , particularly acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein .
“ Did Rosenstein know that the dossier had been debunked by the time he signed the warrant ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Graham asked .

We deserve accountability from leaders in our government.
Lindsey Graham's investigation will help reduce the possibility of the Deep State attempting to interfere in the 2020 election.
Graham has stated that his investigation proceedings could potentially last for a few weeks.
Fox News has some insight on the questions that Graham wants to ask during these depositions:
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., revealed key questions he has going into the Senate Judiciary Committee's investigation of the initiation of the Russia probe and the FBI's use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to conduct surveillance of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
Graham's investigation comes after the Justice Department Inspector General released a report detailing significant inaccuracies and omissions on the part of the FBI in their FISA warrant applications, misleading the court in the process. A major aspect of the report exposed the degree to which the FBI had relied on the unverified dossier compiled by British ex-spy Christopher Steele as part of opposition research for Hillary Clinton's campaign.
"Now I want to know, what did McCabe and Comey know, when did they know that the dossier was unreliable?" Graham told "Sunday Morning Futures" host Maria Bartiromo, referring to former FBI Director James Comey and former Acting Director Andrew McCabe. Comey has insisted that he was not aware of what was going on at the time.
Graham mentioned that Steele's primary sub-source had told the FBI that the information in the dossier was not credible. The Senate Judiciary Committee chairman expressed doubt that this information did not reach the upper levels of the FBI.
“I find it hard to believe that that did not work its way up to Comey and McCabe," he said.
To get to the bottom of this, Graham said that he wants to begin his investigation by calling the four individuals who met with the sub-source to speak to the committee.
Graham said he also wanted to know who else was aware of the problems with the dossier, and when they found out, particularly acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.
“Did Rosenstein know that the dossier had been debunked by the time he signed the warrant? How could he not know?” Graham asked.


welovetrump--2020-03-06--Untold Story: Trump Was Super Tuesday’s Biggest Winner By Over 1 Million Votes

On Super Tuesday , the media was focused on the unfolding Democrat circus .
Would Bloomberg ’ s spending blitz @ @ @ @ @ carve a path to the nomination ?
Would Bernie become unstoppable ?
The answer to @ @ @ @ @ , “ No.
” But while everyone was focused on the Democrats in disarray , @ @ @ @ @ Republican primaries .
The Trump campaign has touted the enthusiasm surge behind Republican voters , @ @ @ @ @ untold story ” of Super Tuesday .
For example , Trump easily won Texas with @ @ @ @ @ is “ one million more than every incumbent in the past 40 years and three @ @ @ @ @ Bush.
” With all the talk of Texas potentially becoming a “ purple ” state @ @ @ @ @ in Texas is yet another signal that the president is in a strong position heading @ @ @ @ @ See the following update from Kayleigh McEnany , the president ’ s 2020 national press @ @ @ @

On Super Tuesday, the media was focused on the unfolding Democrat circus.
Would Bloomberg’s spending blitz pay off? Could Warren carve a path to the nomination? Would Bernie become unstoppable?
The answer to all of those question was, “No.”
But while everyone was focused on the Democrats in disarray, Trump made history in the Republican primaries.
The Trump campaign has touted the enthusiasm surge behind Republican voters, branding it as the “untold story” of Super Tuesday.
For example, Trump easily won Texas with 1.9 million votes, which is “one million more than every incumbent in the past 40 years and three times more than George W. Bush.”
With all the talk of Texas potentially becoming a “purple” state, Trump’s dominance in Texas is yet another signal that the president is in a strong position heading into the 2020 election.
See the following update from Kayleigh McEnany, the president’s 2020 national press secretary, below:


welovetrump--2020-03-06--Romney Hints He May Single-Handedly Derail Subpoena in Biden-Burisma Probe

The mittens are off : Romney has hinted that he may single-handedly block the subpoena in the Biden-Burisma probe .
@ @ @ @ @ vote from a Republican would result in a tie and block the subpoena .
Romney @ @ @ @ @ the lone Republican to vote to convict President Trump during the political impeachment effort .
@ @ @ @ @ announced a final decision , his comments certainly suggest he will vote against the subpoena @ @ @ @ @ can view the comments Romney made to CNN below :

The mittens are off: Romney has hinted that he may single-handedly block the subpoena in the Biden-Burisma probe.
A single “no” vote from a Republican would result in a tie and block the subpoena.
Romney, of course, was the lone Republican to vote to convict President Trump during the political impeachment effort.
Though Romney hasn’t announced a final decision, his comments certainly suggest he will vote against the subpoena investigating Biden-Burisma ties.
You can view the comments Romney made to CNN below:


welovetrump--2020-03-06--AZ Rep. Andy Biggs Introduces Resolution to Condemn Schumer Over Threatening SCOTUS Comments

Chuck Schumer is the minority leader in the Senate .
While debate is a healthy part of the political discource , threatening violence is rhetoric that should never be tolerated , especially when its towards members of the judiciary .
To make matters worse , Schumer doubled-down on his comments before issuing a non-apology apology .
He then claimed that Republicans were creating a controversy out of nothing .
Biggs ' move is an effort to keep our political leaders in check and to make sure that civil servants to do not incite violence .
The Hill has more on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chairman Andy Biggs ( R-Ariz. ) introduced a resolution on Thursday to formally condemn Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer ( D-N.Y. ) over his remarks that two Supreme Court justices would “ pay the price ” for their decisions on an abortion rights case .
Schumer ’ s comments , made during a rally outside the Supreme Court on Wednesday before justices heard arguments over a Louisiana abortion law , sparked outrage from Republicans , who called the remarks a threat .
“ Minority Leader Schumer is the leader of his conference , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ criticism about decisions with which he disagrees , he should not use rhetoric that is threatening and intimidating towards members of our independent judiciary , ” Biggs said in a statement to The Hill .
“ Even after he was called out by many of his own colleagues and the Chief Justice , Leader Schumer would not apologize for his threats .
I am introducing this resolution today to send a message that this threatening rhetoric has no place in the U.S. Congress — especially from a leader of one of our parties @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me on this resolution.
” The resolution argues Schumer should be held to a higher standard due to his position in leadership and says the comments are in “ direct conflict with the Constitutional process by which cases are deliberated and verdicts are issued by the U.S. Supreme Court ” and “ do not contribute anything positive to the public dialogue.
” The resolution also calls on Schumer to issue a formal apology to the Supreme Court Justices and to issue a public statement denouncing violence against any of the three branches of @ @

Chuck Schumer is the minority leader in the Senate.
While debate is a healthy part of the political discource, threatening violence is rhetoric that should never be tolerated, especially when its towards members of the judiciary.
To make matters worse, Schumer doubled-down on his comments before issuing a non-apology apology. He then claimed that Republicans were creating a controversy out of nothing.
Biggs' move is an effort to keep our political leaders in check and to make sure that civil servants to do not incite violence.
The Hill has more on Biggs' resolution:
House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) introduced a resolution on Thursday to formally condemn Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) over his remarks that two Supreme Court justices would “pay the price” for their decisions on an abortion rights case.
Schumer’s comments, made during a rally outside the Supreme Court on Wednesday before justices heard arguments over a Louisiana abortion law, sparked outrage from Republicans, who called the remarks a threat.
“Minority Leader Schumer is the leader of his conference, and, while he may offer public criticism about decisions with which he disagrees, he should not use rhetoric that is threatening and intimidating towards members of our independent judiciary,” Biggs said in a statement to The Hill.
“Even after he was called out by many of his own colleagues and the Chief Justice, Leader Schumer would not apologize for his threats. I am introducing this resolution today to send a message that this threatening rhetoric has no place in the U.S. Congress — especially from a leader of one of our parties. I hope my colleagues will join me on this resolution.”
The resolution argues Schumer should be held to a higher standard due to his position in leadership and says the comments are in “direct conflict with the Constitutional process by which cases are deliberated and verdicts are issued by the U.S. Supreme Court” and “do not contribute anything positive to the public dialogue.”
The resolution also calls on Schumer to issue a formal apology to the Supreme Court Justices and to issue a public statement denouncing violence against any of the three branches of government.
Schumer's comments have set off a political firestorm.


welovetrump--2020-03-06--Middle School Forced Kids to Remove MAGA Hats, Students Say

Students at Marshall Middle School are saying that school officials ordered them to remove their MAGA hats .
Some students @ @ @ @ @ “ targeted ” for wearing the signature hat .
Students were able to pay $ @ @ @ @ @ fundraiser to wear a hat to school .
After donating $ 1 to the fundraiser @ @ @ @ @ wear any hat to school and wear it throughout the day .
It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ dozen students wore MAGA hats to show their support for the President of the United @ @ @ @ @ officials suddenly changed their minds by lunch time and ordered the students to remove their @ @ @ @ @ on the growing controversy are below :

Students at Marshall Middle School are saying that school officials ordered them to remove their MAGA hats.
Some students even claim that they felt “targeted” for wearing the signature hat.
Students were able to pay $1 as part of a fundraiser to wear a hat to school.
After donating $1 to the fundraiser, students were allowed to wear any hat to school and wear it throughout the day.
It’s reported that fewer than a dozen students wore MAGA hats to show their support for the President of the United States.
However, school officials suddenly changed their minds by lunch time and ordered the students to remove their MAGA hats.
More details on the growing controversy are below:


welovetrump--2020-03-06--Breaking: Judicial Watch Files Major Lawsuit Against Adam Schiff Over Subpoenas

Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch rang the alarm at a speech he presented at CPAC , claiming that `` our Republic is under assault '' from the Deep State , including figures like Schiff .
CPAC brings together thousands of conservative leaders from across the country .
Many of these activists look up to Fitton as a leader and invaluable voice of the cause .
At CPAC , Tom Fitton tore into Schiff , warning that if his abuse goes unexposed , then it will enable future abusers to harrass Trump : And let ’ s not forget our favorite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ethically compromised and lied six ways to Sunday about Russia , Trump , and Schiff ’ s leaker ally in the CIA .
We ’ re suing to hold him accountable .
But the DOJ should also be looking at him , too .
And President Trump should cut off Schiff ’ s access to classified information !
And , of course , there is the heavy lifting by Judicial Watch to expose the abuse of the president .
Who needs an IG when you have Judicial Watch ?
We exposed that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Clinton campaign , paid the foreign spy Steele for dirt on Trump .
That ’ s right – your tax dollars helped pay for Hillary Clinton ’ s foreign spy to target President Trump .
We also exposed that the FISA warrant fraud and the fact the FISA court held not one darn hearing on spy warrants targeting candidate Trump and then President Trump .
And we exposed how Bruce and Nellie Ohr funneled misinformation into the DOJ and FBI in order to try to implicate Trump .
We uncovered that Bruce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the middle of the Russiagate spying on Trump – and then got a raise AFTER he was removed for improperly colluding with Clinton spy Christopher Steele .
Why is Ohr still at DOJ !
I tell you what – the best FISA reform would be to prosecute those who illegally spied on President Trump ( and Lord knows who else ) – to prosecute the Spygate ring and put them in jail .
Unfortunately , the Justice Department has been frozen when it comes to prosecuting the REAL bad guys .
Comey got @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And there ’ s no evidence of major prosecutions against any other significant players .
Worse yet , the Justice Department is STILL protecting Hillary Clinton as Judicial Watch forces out more emails and more evidence of criminal conduct .
The statue of limitations has not run on Hillary Clinton , by the way !
I offer a compromise – perhaps President Trump can stop tweeting when the Justice Department starts prosecuting .

Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch rang the alarm at a speech he presented at CPAC, claiming that "our Republic is under assault" from the Deep State, including figures like Schiff.
CPAC brings together thousands of conservative leaders from across the country.
Many of these activists look up to Fitton as a leader and invaluable voice of the cause.
At CPAC, Tom Fitton tore into Schiff, warning that if his abuse goes unexposed, then it will enable future abusers to harrass Trump:
And let’s not forget our favorite – Adam Schiff. Adam Schiff is ethically compromised and lied six ways to Sunday about Russia, Trump, and Schiff’s leaker ally in the CIA. We’re suing to hold him accountable. But the DOJ should also be looking at him, too. And President Trump should cut off Schiff’s access to classified information!
And, of course, there is the heavy lifting by Judicial Watch to expose the abuse of the president. Who needs an IG when you have Judicial Watch? We exposed that the FBI, in a joint operation with the Clinton campaign, paid the foreign spy Steele for dirt on Trump. That’s right – your tax dollars helped pay for Hillary Clinton’s foreign spy to target President Trump. We also exposed that the FISA warrant fraud and the fact the FISA court held not one darn hearing on spy warrants targeting candidate Trump and then President Trump. And we exposed how Bruce and Nellie Ohr funneled misinformation into the DOJ and FBI in order to try to implicate Trump. We uncovered that Bruce Ohr got a $28k bonus in the middle of the Russiagate spying on Trump – and then got a raise AFTER he was removed for improperly colluding with Clinton spy Christopher Steele. Why is Ohr still at DOJ!
I tell you what – the best FISA reform would be to prosecute those who illegally spied on President Trump (and Lord knows who else) – to prosecute the Spygate ring and put them in jail.
Unfortunately, the Justice Department has been frozen when it comes to prosecuting the REAL bad guys. Comey got a pass. McCabe got a pass. And there’s no evidence of major prosecutions against any other significant players. Worse yet, the Justice Department is STILL protecting Hillary Clinton as Judicial Watch forces out more emails and more evidence of criminal conduct. The statue of limitations has not run on Hillary Clinton, by the way!
I offer a compromise – perhaps President Trump can stop tweeting when the Justice Department starts prosecuting.


welovetrump--2020-03-06--4 Squad Members Voted AGAINST Bill That Would Stop Terrorists, Sexual Predators from Working at TSA

Fortunately , thanks to overwhelming Republican support , the bill was able to pass the House .
Still , it is so shocking that the radical left-wing of the Democrat party was able to convince 174 members to vote against a bill that would protect TSA workers , federal employees , and all American citizens .
The Free Beacon highlights exactly how the vote unfolded : Forty-two House Democrats bucked party leadership on Thursday to pass an amendment ensuring that individuals convicted of sex crimes , terrorism , and other violent offenses can not be employed by the TSA .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ movement against sexual misconduct , 174 House Democrats voted against an amendment to the Rights for Transportation Security Officers Act that alters the way TSA disciplines and fires workers .
The amendment divided Democrats on Thursday despite the fact that it was written by Democratic Rep. Lauren Underwood ( Ill. ) .
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy ( R. , Calif. ) criticized liberal lawmakers for attempting to sabotage efforts to safeguard the public from sexual predators .
`` [ The amendment ] was pulled back by leadership because the socialist wing of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that amendment go forward on this bill , '' McCarthy said on Thursday .
`` When it was offered , overwhelmingly the majority of the House would like to see the TSA not hire terrorists or those who have been convicted of sexual misconduct with minors and others .
But the socialist wing of the party , that controls now the Democratic Party , said that that could not be offered . ''
Republicans were able to include the amendment in the bill only after Underwood and 41 other Democrats broke ranks to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a 227-175 vote .
Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ( D. , N.Y. ) , Ilhan Omar ( D , Minn. ) , Rashida Tlaib ( D. , Mich. ) , and Ayanna Pressley ( D. , Mass . )
, as well as House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer ( D. , Md . )
, all voted against Underwood 's amendment when Rep. Debbie Lesko ( R. , Ariz. ) put it forward in a motion to recommit—the last opportunity for a House bill to be amended before a final passage vote .
House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) did not vote on the motion .
A top Republican aide criticized Democratic leaders for bowing to party leaders on the measure .
`` It 's no surprise that Democrat logic in 2020 means taking marching orders from Justice Democrats to give TSA the ability to hire the Harvey Weinsteins of the world , '' the aide said .
`` A ‘ second chance ' for sex offenders should n't include patting down traveling families . ''
Where is the outrage ?
!
Is n't the Democrat party supposed to be the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sexual predators ?
And what 's the logic in voting to allow the TSA to refuse to hire a terrorist ?
Many took to Twitter to express their astonishment .

Fortunately, thanks to overwhelming Republican support, the bill was able to pass the House.
Still, it is so shocking that the radical left-wing of the Democrat party was able to convince 174 members to vote against a bill that would protect TSA workers, federal employees, and all American citizens.
The Free Beacon highlights exactly how the vote unfolded:
Forty-two House Democrats bucked party leadership on Thursday to pass an amendment ensuring that individuals convicted of sex crimes, terrorism, and other violent offenses cannot be employed by the TSA.
Despite their support for the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct, 174 House Democrats voted against an amendment to the Rights for Transportation Security Officers Act that alters the way TSA disciplines and fires workers. The amendment divided Democrats on Thursday despite the fact that it was written by Democratic Rep. Lauren Underwood (Ill.). House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) criticized liberal lawmakers for attempting to sabotage efforts to safeguard the public from sexual predators.
"[The amendment] was pulled back by leadership because the socialist wing of the party did not want to have that amendment go forward on this bill," McCarthy said on Thursday. "When it was offered, overwhelmingly the majority of the House would like to see the TSA not hire terrorists or those who have been convicted of sexual misconduct with minors and others. But the socialist wing of the party, that controls now the Democratic Party, said that that could not be offered."
Republicans were able to include the amendment in the bill only after Underwood and 41 other Democrats broke ranks to insert the language into the bill in a 227-175 vote. Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (D, Minn.), Rashida Tlaib (D., Mich.), and Ayanna Pressley (D., Mass.), as well as House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D., Md.), all voted against Underwood's amendment when Rep. Debbie Lesko (R., Ariz.) put it forward in a motion to recommit—the last opportunity for a House bill to be amended before a final passage vote. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) did not vote on the motion. A top Republican aide criticized Democratic leaders for bowing to party leaders on the measure.
"It's no surprise that Democrat logic in 2020 means taking marching orders from Justice Democrats to give TSA the ability to hire the Harvey Weinsteins of the world," the aide said. "A ‘second chance' for sex offenders shouldn't include patting down traveling families."
Where is the outrage?!
Isn't the Democrat party supposed to be the "woke" when it comes to sexual predators? And what's the logic in voting to allow the TSA to refuse to hire a terrorist?
Many took to Twitter to express their astonishment.


welovetrump--2020-03-06--Ilhan Omar’s Tweetstorm Calls Kavanaugh and Gorsuch “Accused Sexual Predators”

Representative Ilhan Omar , who has been notably accused of marrying her brother , just defamed the Supreme Court of @ @ @ @ @ a crazed tweetstorm , Omar lashed out and called Kavanaugh and Gorsuch “ accused sexual @ @ @ @ @ suggestion , Omar then claimed that abortion is a Constitutional right .
And we thought @ @ @ @ @ party couldn ’ t get any crazier !
See Omar ’ s tone-deaf tweets for @ @

Representative Ilhan Omar, who has been notably accused of marrying her brother, just defamed the Supreme Court of the United States.
In a crazed tweetstorm, Omar lashed out and called Kavanaugh and Gorsuch “accused sexual predators.”
After the grotesque suggestion, Omar then claimed that abortion is a Constitutional right.
Wow…
And we thought the AOC-branch of the Democratic party couldn’t get any crazier!
See Omar’s tone-deaf tweets for yourself:


welovetrump--2020-03-07--Trump’s Fox News Town Hall Breaks Most-Watched Viewership Record, 4.2 Million Tune In

President Trump participated in a town hall on Fox News and made history… again !
This time , Trump helped @ @ @ @ @ for any town hall in history .
According to data from Nielsen Media Research , @ @ @ @ @ the town hall with the president , which was hosted in Scanton , PA. Of @ @ @ @ @ tuned into Fox News , 744,000 were in the coveted 25-54 age demographic .
To @ @ @ @ @ 1.4 million viewers tuned in to MSNBC and fewer than 1 million viewers tuned into @ @ @ @ @ .
See more details below !

President Trump participated in a town hall on Fox News and made history… again!
This time, Trump helped deliver the highest ratings ever for any town hall in history.
According to data from Nielsen Media Research, 4.2 million viewers tuned into the town hall with the president, which was hosted in Scanton, PA.
Of the 4.2 million viewers who tuned into Fox News, 744,000 were in the coveted 25-54 age demographic.
To put this into perspective, 1.4 million viewers tuned in to MSNBC and fewer than 1 million viewers tuned into CNN during the same time.
See more details below!


welovetrump--2020-03-07--Dr. Ben Carson Brilliantly Defends Mike Pence Against Dems’ Coronavirus Attacks

During a news conference , Dr. Carson slammed Democrats for their partisan politcal attacks against the Trump administration .
Prior to pursuing a career in politics and public service , he was famous in the medical field for separating conjoined twins .
Dr. Carson used his credentials as a physician to defende the Vice President and scold the Democrats for shallow attacks .
The Western Journal has details on the press conference where Dr. Carson spoke : Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson defended the coronavirus task force ’ s handling of the virus from partisan political attacks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Carson , who recently joined the task force , defended its efforts to contain the spread of the potentially deadly infectious disease .
“ I want to thank the vice president and the president for a very aggressive and careful leadership , ” he said Wednesday .
Carson , who was a renowned neurosurgeon before beginning his career in politics and public service , added : “ I was involved throughout my neurosurgical career in a lot of very , very complex cases and dealt with a lot of renowned physicians .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on this task force are extremely impressive , have been considering all of the various different possibilities , outlining scenarios for all the possibilities that can occur.
” Carson added he believes the risks associated with contracting the disease are low , “ largely because of the aggressive actions that have been taken and are continuing to be taken every day.
” The HUD secretary also praised pharmaceutical companies for working together “ voluntarily ” in order to help to find a way to manage potential outbreaks .
“ Wouldn ’ t that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
” he joked .
Carson ’ s comments came in response to partisan criticism of President Donald Trump ’ s handling of his administration ’ s preparedness of a possible outbreak of the virus .
Criticism of the Trump administration 's response is especially questionable since Trump took strong action early-on to limit travel from China .
Scientists have quietly admited that Trump 's early actions have helped save lives .
Rather than focusing on the credentials of Trump 's coronavirus task force , the media would rather focus on non-issues like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Take a look at CNN 's criticism that many have called `` race-baiting . ''

During a news conference, Dr. Carson slammed Democrats for their partisan politcal attacks against the Trump administration.
Carson is a highly regarded and renowned neurosurgeon.
Prior to pursuing a career in politics and public service, he was famous in the medical field for separating conjoined twins.
Dr. Carson used his credentials as a physician to defende the Vice President and scold the Democrats for shallow attacks.
The Western Journal has details on the press conference where Dr. Carson spoke:
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson defended the coronavirus task force’s handling of the virus from partisan political attacks this week at a news conference.
Carson, who recently joined the task force, defended its efforts to contain the spread of the potentially deadly infectious disease.
“I want to thank the vice president and the president for a very aggressive and careful leadership,” he said Wednesday.
Carson, who was a renowned neurosurgeon before beginning his career in politics and public service, added: “I was involved throughout my neurosurgical career in a lot of very, very complex cases and dealt with a lot of renowned physicians.
“But I must say that the people on this task force are extremely impressive, have been considering all of the various different possibilities, outlining scenarios for all the possibilities that can occur.”
Carson added he believes the risks associated with contracting the disease are low, “largely because of the aggressive actions that have been taken and are continuing to be taken every day.”
The HUD secretary also praised pharmaceutical companies for working together “voluntarily” in order to help to find a way to manage potential outbreaks.
“Wouldn’t that be a great lesson for the politicians?” he joked.
Carson’s comments came in response to partisan criticism of President Donald Trump’s handling of his administration’s preparedness of a possible outbreak of the virus.
Criticism of the Trump administration's response is especially questionable since Trump took strong action early-on to limit travel from China.
Scientists have quietly admited that Trump's early actions have helped save lives.
But Ben Carson has a point.
Rather than focusing on the credentials of Trump's coronavirus task force, the media would rather focus on non-issues like the racial diversity of the force itself.
Take a look at CNN's criticism that many have called "race-baiting."


welovetrump--2020-03-07--Joe Biden is “Mentally Deteriorating,” Warns Prominent Democrat Strategist Justin Horwitz

This is n't the first time that Horwitz has raised questions about Biden 's fitness for office .
Aside from appearing on Tucker Carlson 's show , he also made similar remarks to Breitbart in February , saying that it was `` obvious '' that the presumptive Democrat nominee is `` not all there anymore . ''
That 's a stinging rebuke from a strategist in your own party , especially as the fight for the nomination enters its final phases .
Breitbart has more on Horwitz 's warning : Democrat strategist and backer of Sen. Bernie Sanders ( I-VT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appearance on Tucker Carlson Tonight that Joe Biden ( D ) is “ mentally deteriorating ” and that it will be a “ disaster ” if the Democrat establishment ’ s purported efforts to “ shield ” the former vice president prevail , leading to a head to head matchup with President Trump .
Horwitz , an outspoken Sanders supporter , spoke with Tucker Carlson Thursday night and discussed the Democrat establishment ’ s purported efforts to “ shield ” a “ mentally deteriorating ” Biden from the public .
“ He is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ People in the Democratic establishment say , ‘ Oh don ’ t say that.
’ They really believe that they can shield Joe Biden from public scrutiny and the reality is , they can ’ t , ” he said .
“ We all see what ’ s going on here and it ’ s going to be a disaster if we nominate Joe Biden , ” he added .
When asked by Carlson if he believes that the Democrat establishment is “ perfectly aware ” of what is happening with Biden , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aware with what is happening with Joe Biden , ” calling him a “ candidate in decline.
” “ We all see it .
He can ’ t get on stage without making some type of gaffe , and these aren ’ t the same gaffes that he made in his previous two failed presidential runs , ” he said .
“ These gaffes are a lot more serious .
These gaffes clearly indicate that he is not all there anymore.
” It would be one thing if Joe Biden had an occassional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trail ...
But his gaffes have increased in frequency and severity .
See some of the latest examples below :

This isn't the first time that Horwitz has raised questions about Biden's fitness for office.
Aside from appearing on Tucker Carlson's show, he also made similar remarks to Breitbart in February, saying that it was "obvious" that the presumptive Democrat nominee is "not all there anymore."
Ouch.
That's a stinging rebuke from a strategist in your own party, especially as the fight for the nomination enters its final phases.
Breitbart has more on Horwitz's warning:
Democrat strategist and backer of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) Justin Horwitz said during a Thursday appearance on Tucker Carlson Tonight that Joe Biden (D) is “mentally deteriorating” and that it will be a “disaster” if the Democrat establishment’s purported efforts to “shield” the former vice president prevail, leading to a head to head matchup with President Trump.
Horwitz, an outspoken Sanders supporter, spoke with Tucker Carlson Thursday night and discussed the Democrat establishment’s purported efforts to “shield” a “mentally deteriorating” Biden from the public. “He is a candidate that is mentally deteriorating. People in the Democratic establishment say, ‘Oh don’t say that.’ They really believe that they can shield Joe Biden from public scrutiny and the reality is, they can’t,” he said. “We all see what’s going on here and it’s going to be a disaster if we nominate Joe Biden,” he added. When asked by Carlson if he believes that the Democrat establishment is “perfectly aware” of what is happening with Biden, Horwitz noted that “everyone is perfectly aware with what is happening with Joe Biden,” calling him a “candidate in decline.” “We all see it. He can’t get on stage without making some type of gaffe, and these aren’t the same gaffes that he made in his previous two failed presidential runs,” he said. “These gaffes are a lot more serious. These gaffes clearly indicate that he is not all there anymore.”
It would be one thing if Joe Biden had an occassional slip of the tongue on the campaign trail...
But his gaffes have increased in frequency and severity.
See some of the latest examples below:


welovetrump--2020-03-07--Trump Nominates First-Ever Black Air Force Chief of Staff, Gets High Praise from Military Leaders

While the media paints President Trump as a racist , he is making the case to the American people that @ @ @ @ @ .
Trump has enacted policies that have significantly benefited minority communities , leading to the @ @ @ @ @ Americans in history .
Now… Trump has made history yet again !
The president has @ @ @ @ @ Chief of Staff : General Charles Q Brown Jr .
He would be the first @ @ @ @ @ hold the position .
Attention mainstream media : this is the kind of story that @ @ @ @ @ !

While the media paints President Trump as a racist, he is making the case to the American people that actions speak louder than words.
Trump has enacted policies that have significantly benefited minority communities, leading to the lowest unemployment rates for African Americans in history.
Now… Trump has made history yet again!
The president has nominated the first-ever black Airforce Chief of Staff: General Charles Q Brown Jr.
He would be the first black man in history to hold the position.
Attention mainstream media: this is the kind of story that should be getting national attention!


welovetrump--2020-03-07--Rejected: Jussie Smollet Can’t Throw Out New Charges, Illinois High Court Rules

Charges that formally accuse Jussie Smollett of lying about a hate crime in Chicago can not be thrown out , @ @ @ @ @ ruled .
Smollett attempted to have the case halted and thrown out , but the @ @ @ @ @ has thwarted his attempt .
It was just a year ago when Smollett alleged that @ @ @ @ @ attacked him in the middle of the night in Chicago yelling , “ This is @ @ @ @ @ , of course , is one of the most reliably blue , liberal cities in @ @ @ @ @ on the state ’ s rulings below :

It’s time to face the music, Jussie.
Charges that formally accuse Jussie Smollett of lying about a hate crime in Chicago cannot be thrown out, the Illinois Supreme Court has ruled.
Smollett attempted to have the case halted and thrown out, but the state’s high court has thwarted his attempt.
It was just a year ago when Smollett alleged that Trump supporters wearing MAGA hats attacked him in the middle of the night in Chicago yelling, “This is Trump Country!”
Chicago, of course, is one of the most reliably blue, liberal cities in the country.
More details on the state’s rulings below:


welovetrump--2020-03-07--SCOTUS Protects American Consumers: States Can Prosecute Illegals for Identity Theft

The ruling protects the Constitution as well as American citizens .
Furthermore , the decision actually helps promote state 's rights .
The case brought before the Supreme Court came from Kansas , where an illegal alien was conviced under a state identity theft law .
CNN has more on the case from Kansas and the ruling by SCOTUS : In the challenge at hand , Ramiro Garcia , an undocumented immigrant , used the Social Security number of someone else in order to get a job in a restaurant .
After it was discovered that he had worked illegally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ identity theft law .
But lawyers for Garcia challenged the conviction , arguing that he could not be convicted under state law because it is preempted by the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 that establishes a framework for the regulation of the employment of undocumented immigrants .
Under the law , an employee must submit documents establishing work authorization and an employer must attest to their employee 's status .
`` While Kansas may prosecute a wide range of offenses , '' a lawyer for Garcia told the justices , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have its own individual immigration policy and immigration offenses.
`` The Kansas Supreme Court threw out Garcia 's conviction , and that of two others , holding that the state prosecution , based in part on information from a federal form , could not occur because the state law intruded on an area governed by federal law .
Kansas brought its appeal to the Supreme Court , arguing that even though its prosecution was based on information available on federal forms , that same information had been submitted to the state .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the federal government , but instead enforcing its own identity theft regulation .
`` We are n't targeting folks because of their status , '' an attorney for Kansas argued in court .
`` We are enforcing our employment identity theft laws , and we do n't want to give special exception to people because of their status . ''
The state said that the lower court opinion swept too broadly , infringing upon states ' rights to enforce their laws and that the opinion `` defies common sense '' and could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the scope of congressional power to override the States ' traditionally broad police power to enact criminal laws , '' including those to punish identity theft .
Significantly , the federal government sides with Kansas in the case , arguing in briefs that the federal law and state law at issue are not in conflict and that the lower court ignored the fact that the state prosecution could have gone forward without ever relying upon federal forms .
In briefs , Solicitor General Noel Francisco said that the lower court opinion `` raises @ @ @ @ @ @ @ results '' by blocking a state from enforcing identity threat prosecutions .
`` Kansas ' prosecutions , '' Francisco argued , `` neither invade a federally occupied field nor conflict with Congress ' purposes '' in passing the federal law .

The ruling protects the Constitution as well as American citizens.
Furthermore, the decision actually helps promote state's rights.
The case brought before the Supreme Court came from Kansas, where an illegal alien was conviced under a state identity theft law.
CNN has more on the case from Kansas and the ruling by SCOTUS:
In the challenge at hand, Ramiro Garcia, an undocumented immigrant, used the Social Security number of someone else in order to get a job in a restaurant. After it was discovered that he had worked illegally, he was convicted under a state identity theft law.
But lawyers for Garcia challenged the conviction, arguing that he could not be convicted under state law because it is preempted by the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 that establishes a framework for the regulation of the employment of undocumented immigrants. Under the law, an employee must submit documents establishing work authorization and an employer must attest to their employee's status.
"While Kansas may prosecute a wide range of offenses," a lawyer for Garcia told the justices, "what Kansas might not do is have its own individual immigration policy and immigration offenses. "
The Kansas Supreme Court threw out Garcia's conviction, and that of two others, holding that the state prosecution, based in part on information from a federal form, could not occur because the state law intruded on an area governed by federal law.
Kansas brought its appeal to the Supreme Court, arguing that even though its prosecution was based on information available on federal forms, that same information had been submitted to the state. It also argued that it was not interfering with the federal government, but instead enforcing its own identity theft regulation.
Obamacare arguments put Supreme Court and health care in presidential election spotlight
Obamacare arguments put Supreme Court and health care in presidential election spotlight
"We aren't targeting folks because of their status," an attorney for Kansas argued in court. "We are enforcing our employment identity theft laws, and we don't want to give special exception to people because of their status."
The state said that the lower court opinion swept too broadly, infringing upon states' rights to enforce their laws and that the opinion "defies common sense" and could lead to "serious constitutional questions about the scope of congressional power to override the States' traditionally broad police power to enact criminal laws," including those to punish identity theft.
Significantly, the federal government sides with Kansas in the case, arguing in briefs that the federal law and state law at issue are not in conflict and that the lower court ignored the fact that the state prosecution could have gone forward without ever relying upon federal forms. In briefs, Solicitor General Noel Francisco said that the lower court opinion "raises federalism concerns" and "produces untenable results" by blocking a state from enforcing identity threat prosecutions.
"Kansas' prosecutions," Francisco argued, "neither invade a federally occupied field nor conflict with Congress' purposes" in passing the federal law.


welovetrump--2020-03-07--Major Trump Announcement: Mark Meadows Named Chief of Staff

So what does this mean ?
What will Mark Meadows bring with him as he serves as Chief of Staff ?
Well , he has a lot of unique qualities and qualifications that will benefit the Trump Administration .
For example , Meadows is a known savvy strategist who is adeptly skilled at negotiating and operating behind the scenes .
He can get things done !
Meadows also has incredible relationships with people on capitol hill .
Both Democrats and Republicans have respect for Meadows , so he can leverage those relationships to help achieve bipartisan accomplishments for the Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to how Meadows will benefit the White House : WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF for TRUMP is a job that is perfectly suited for how MEADOWS sees himself .
It ’ s made for a savvy strategist who can operate behind the scenes , manage a Game of Thrones-like environment and occasionally burst into the limelight to defend the president and blast his enemies .
It ’ s long overdue that TRUMP made this move , since he ’ s been listening to MEADOWS over PAUL RYAN and other party stalwarts for years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yes , there are some , mostly in the GOP -- see this job as the ultimate moment that will finally reveal the North Carolina Republican as a top-notch fraud who couldn ’ t find his way out of a wet paper bag .
And , to be fair , he has never managed a crisis like this , so he ’ s starting with quite the challenge staring him down .
MEADOWS DOES HAVE considerable talents he can deploy here .
Even people who don ’ t like him acknowledge his deep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ understanding of how the levers of power work .
He understands the small tokens that can be distributed to win lawmakers ’ support and loyalty -- and can find his way to temporarily trading or loaning his ideology to achieve a larger end .
PERHAPS MOST NOTABLY FOR TRUMP , he has relationships with Democrats .
People make a lot of MEADOWS ’ relationship with the widely respected ELIJAH CUMMINGS .
That relationship is instructive of his across-the-aisle bonds .
CUMMINGS didn ’ t see MEADOWS as a saint .
But the late @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was : an operator who was open for business .
MEADOWS has a relationship with STENY HOYER , which will be useful for him .
His relationship with KEVIN MCCARTHY is , well , how to put this lightly ?
It ’ s complicated , but at this point it ’ s functional .
MEADOWS , more than anything , understands Washington ’ s power games , how to play them to maximum impact and what they actually mean .
For example , MEADOWS was quite public with us for our book about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In his mind , it was the opening clash between NANCY PELOSI and TRUMP that would set the stage for the rest of his first term .
He was right on that front .
Many took to Twitter to congratulation Meadow 's on the new position !
Are you as excited as we are ?

So what does this mean?
What will Mark Meadows bring with him as he serves as Chief of Staff?
Well, he has a lot of unique qualities and qualifications that will benefit the Trump Administration.
For example, Meadows is a known savvy strategist who is adeptly skilled at negotiating and operating behind the scenes. He can get things done!
Meadows also has incredible relationships with people on capitol hill. Both Democrats and Republicans have respect for Meadows, so he can leverage those relationships to help achieve bipartisan accomplishments for the Trump administration.
Politico has more insight as to how Meadows will benefit the White House:
WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF for TRUMP is a job that is perfectly suited for how MEADOWS sees himself. It’s made for a savvy strategist who can operate behind the scenes, manage a Game of Thrones-like environment and occasionally burst into the limelight to defend the president and blast his enemies. It’s long overdue that TRUMP made this move, since he’s been listening to MEADOWS over PAUL RYAN and other party stalwarts for years.
MEADOWS’ DETRACTORS -- and, yes, there are some, mostly in the GOP -- see this job as the ultimate moment that will finally reveal the North Carolina Republican as a top-notch fraud who couldn’t find his way out of a wet paper bag. And, to be fair, he has never managed a crisis like this, so he’s starting with quite the challenge staring him down.
MEADOWS DOES HAVE considerable talents he can deploy here. Even people who don’t like him acknowledge his deep relationships in Washington, and his uncanny understanding of how the levers of power work. He understands the small tokens that can be distributed to win lawmakers’ support and loyalty -- and can find his way to temporarily trading or loaning his ideology to achieve a larger end.
PERHAPS MOST NOTABLY FOR TRUMP, he has relationships with Democrats. People make a lot of MEADOWS’ relationship with the widely respected ELIJAH CUMMINGS. That relationship is instructive of his across-the-aisle bonds. CUMMINGS didn’t see MEADOWS as a saint. But the late Baltimore Democrat saw MEADOWS for what he was: an operator who was open for business. MEADOWS has a relationship with STENY HOYER, which will be useful for him. His relationship with KEVIN MCCARTHY is, well, how to put this lightly? It’s complicated, but at this point it’s functional.
MEADOWS, more than anything, understands Washington’s power games, how to play them to maximum impact and what they actually mean. For example, MEADOWS was quite public with us for our book about the fight for the border wall: In his mind, it was the opening clash between NANCY PELOSI and TRUMP that would set the stage for the rest of his first term. He was right on that front.
Many took to Twitter to congratulation Meadow's on the new position!
Are you as excited as we are?
This is HUGE news!


welovetrump--2020-03-09--GA Republican Introduces Bill To Stop Child Transgender Surgeries, Make Cross-Sex Hormone Drugs Ille

GA Republican Introduces Bill To Stop Child Transgender Surgeries, Make Cross-Sex Hormone Drugs Illegal for Minors

Rather , there is an interested to protect children who are young , vulnerable , and may be pressured by influences in pop culture , media , and society at large .
This conversation comes at a time when Democrats assure us that `` gender is a social construct . ''
Breitbart has more on HB 1060 and what it would mean for child transgender surgers and drugs : A Georgia Republican lawmaker has introduced a bill that would make child transgender surgeries and drugs illegal .
On February 27 , Georgia State Rep. Ginny Ehrhart ( R ) introduced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1060 ) in the Georgia House of Representatives .
The legislation would ban health care professionals from performing transgender surgeries on a minor child – such as mastectomy , vaginoplasty , castration , penectomy , etc .
– “ for the purpose of attempting to affirm the minor ’ s perception of such minor ’ s sex , if that perception is inconsistent with such minor ’ s sex.
” The legislation would ban health care professionals from performing transgender surgeries on a minor child – such as mastectomy , vaginoplasty , castration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the purpose of attempting to affirm the minor ’ s perception of such minor ’ s sex , if that perception is inconsistent with such minor ’ s sex.
” In addition , the bill would make illegal the administering of medications , such as puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones , to children for the same purpose .
“ This form of child abuse is becoming a serious problem in Georgia and is evolving into a national crisis , ” Ehrhart told the local CBS affiliate about her bill in October .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ children who have not reached the legal age of consent yet are being subjected to life-altering , irreversible surgeries and drug treatments that render them sterile and permanently disfigured .
The psychological damage this does to innocent children must come to an end .
This legislation makes such abusive actions criminal .
Vernadette Broyles , president and general counsel of the Child and Parental Rights Campaign ( CPRC ) , told Breitbart News in an interview the bill was partly modeled after one that came close to passing in South Dakota .
While @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are finally coming out to support the bill and her effort .
Many say that children should be protected and that they should be taught the truth about science and biology .

A transgender procedure is irreversable.
Republicans aren't fighting to ban it altogether.
Rather, there is an interested to protect children who are young, vulnerable, and may be pressured by influences in pop culture, media, and society at large.
This conversation comes at a time when Democrats assure us that "gender is a social construct."
Huh.
Breitbart has more on HB 1060 and what it would mean for child transgender surgers and drugs:
A Georgia Republican lawmaker has introduced a bill that would make child transgender surgeries and drugs illegal.
On February 27, Georgia State Rep. Ginny Ehrhart (R) introduced the Vulnerable Child Protection Act (HB 1060) in the Georgia House of Representatives.
The legislation would ban health care professionals from performing transgender surgeries on a minor child – such as mastectomy, vaginoplasty, castration, penectomy, etc. – “for the purpose of attempting to affirm the minor’s perception of such minor’s sex, if that perception is inconsistent with such minor’s sex.”
The legislation would ban health care professionals from performing transgender surgeries on a minor child – such as mastectomy, vaginoplasty, castration, penectomy, etc. – “for the purpose of attempting to affirm the minor’s perception of such minor’s sex, if that perception is inconsistent with such minor’s sex.”
In addition, the bill would make illegal the administering of medications, such as puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones, to children for the same purpose.
“This form of child abuse is becoming a serious problem in Georgia and is evolving into a national crisis,” Ehrhart told the local CBS affiliate about her bill in October. She added:
We are talking about children who have not reached the legal age of consent yet are being subjected to life-altering, irreversible surgeries and drug treatments that render them sterile and permanently disfigured. The psychological damage this does to innocent children must come to an end. This legislation makes such abusive actions criminal.
Vernadette Broyles, president and general counsel of the Child and Parental Rights Campaign (CPRC), told Breitbart News in an interview the bill was partly modeled after one that came close to passing in South Dakota.
While Ehrhart started the charge, many Republicans are finally coming out to support the bill and her effort.
Many say that children should be protected and that they should be taught the truth about science and biology.


welovetrump--2020-03-09--Tennessee Tornado Victims Rally Around Trump During Visit, Shouting “Amen!”

A string of violent storms hit Tennessee last week , producing 7 tornados that roared through the middle of the @ @ @ @ @ .
A State of Emergency was declared in Tennessee and the damage was devastating , @ @ @ @ @ with at least 2 dozen still missing .
President Trump visited the state on Friday @ @ @ @ @ people who had lost everything .
He even made time to meet with volunteers .
@ @ @ @ @ week for Tennessee as hundreds of families lost everything they owned , Trump ’ s @ @ @ @ @ to the state .
Video shows shouts of “ Amen !
” as victims of @ @ @ @ @ Tennessee .
See more below :

A string of violent storms hit Tennessee last week, producing 7 tornados that roared through the middle of the state, including downtown Nashville.
A State of Emergency was declared in Tennessee and the damage was devastating, claiming at least 25 lives with at least 2 dozen still missing.
President Trump visited the state on Friday, touring wreckage and comforting people who had lost everything.
He even made time to meet with volunteers.
While it was a somber week for Tennessee as hundreds of families lost everything they owned, Trump’s visit brought hope and inspiration to the state.
Video shows shouts of “Amen!” as victims of the tornado greeted Trump in Tennessee.
See more below:


welovetrump--2020-03-09--Video: Joe Biden Appears to “Endorse” Donald Trump for President In Yet Another Gaffe

In an odd , gaffe-riddled speech that lasted less than 10 minutes , Joe Biden appeared to endorse none other @ @ @ @ @ !
Speaking to supporters in St. Louis , Missouri , Biden said that “ we @ @ @ @ @ — we can not win this re-election — excuse me .
We can only re-elect @ @ @ @ @ in fact , we get engaged in this circular firing squad here .
Got ta @ @ @ @ @ so join us.
” Though Biden is known to be gaffe-prone , he ’ s @ @ @ @ @ the campaign trail within the last week .
The unintended endorsement caught the attention of @ @ @ @ @ the only thing Biden has said correctly since he started his campaign below :

We agree Joe!
In an odd, gaffe-riddled speech that lasted less than 10 minutes, Joe Biden appeared to endorse none other than… Donald Trump for President!
Speaking to supporters in St. Louis, Missouri, Biden said that “we cannot get — re-elect — we cannot win this re-election — excuse me. We can only re-elect Donald Trump — if, in fact, we get engaged in this circular firing squad here. Gotta be a positive campaign, so join us.”
Say what?!
Though Biden is known to be gaffe-prone, he’s been unusually sloppy on the the campaign trail within the last week.
The unintended endorsement caught the attention of the president himself!
See the only thing Biden has said correctly since he started his campaign below: