welovetrump--2020-12-15--Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla Says He Will NOT Get the Vaccine — For Now, That Is

The CEO of Pfizer has announced that he will NOT be taking the COVID-19… For now , that is .
Albert Bourla insists he is waiting on taking the vaccine so that healthcare workers can get it first .
Specifically , the Independent reports that Bourla said : This is not a good look coming from the CEO of a company that developed the vaccine .
Many people are worried about the safety of a vaccine that has been developed quickly .
To be clear , the clinical trials and studies appear to suggest that the vaccine is safe and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Why wouldn ’ t the CEO of the company itself take the vaccine to prove that the vaccine is safe and effective ?
Many on social media have already taken notice : You would think that the CEO of the vaccine company would want to build trust in the vaccine !
But this “ publicity stunt ” appears to have backfired .
Many people are even more nervous than before about the vaccine .
CNBC has more details on the CEO ’ s comments : Monday he and other executives will not “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kick off a massive effort to distribute the vaccine across the country .
The vaccine , which Pfizer developed in partnership with Germany-based BioNTech , is the first approved for emergency use in the U.S. to prevent Covid-19 .
The Food and Drug Administration on Friday authorized the vaccine for use in people 16 and older , and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Sunday officially recommended its use .
However , there are limited doses available and as such , the CDC has recommended states prioritize health-care workers and long-term @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bourla ’ s company developed the vaccine , he is not a frontline health-care worker himself .
He said he ’ s also 59 and in relatively good health , so it ’ s not entirely appropriate for him to receive the vaccine before other people who need it more .
If he was vaccinated on camera , he said it might help increase the public ’ s willingness to receive it , citing Pfizer ’ s internal research .
But he emphasized that “ none of the executives and board members will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Americans to “ trust science ” and encouraged people to get vaccinated when appropriate , based on their age and occupation .
“ This is a vaccine that was developed without cutting corners from a company with 171 years of credentials , ” Bourla said Monday on “ Squawk Box.
” “ This is a vaccine that was developed in the spotlight , in the daylight , with all the data being put in a server.
” Bourla ’ s comments come as the first deliveries of doses are set to arrive at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s 636 pre-determined distribution sites .
Some frontline health-care workers are due to be vaccinated as soon as Monday morning and vaccination is set to begin among long-term care residents next week , according to Operation Warp Speed officials .
It ’ s a monumental logistical challenge .
The federal government has partnered with UPS , FedEx , McKesson , CVS , Walgreens , among others , to help distribute the vaccine and actually administer it .
But state immunization officials have warned that the so-called last-mile delivery of the vaccine will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ largely responsible for that effort .
State officials have repeatedly called on the federal government to provide more funding to hasten the effort .
In order to get the public on board , leaders will need to get vaccinated .
Even if Bourla is being authentic , it ’ s not a good look for the CEO .
Especially in an age where people are worried about the substances they are putting into their body .
The news of Bourla ’ s comments comes just a day after President Trump reversed a plan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Initially , the White House staff would be one of the first vaccinated .
Now , that plan has been rescinded thanks to President Trump .
The New York Times has more details : President Trump said on Sunday night that he would delay a plan for senior White House staff members to receive the coronavirus vaccine in the coming days , hours after The New York Times reported that the administration was planning to rapidly distribute the vaccine to its staff at a time when the first doses are generally being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mr. Trump , who tested positive for the coronavirus in October and recovered after being hospitalized , also implied that he would get the vaccine himself at some point in the future , but said he had no immediate plans to do so .
“ People working in the White House should receive the vaccine somewhat later in the program , unless specifically necessary , ” Mr. Trump tweeted , hours after a National Security Council spokesman had defended the plan .
“ I have asked that this adjustment be made .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but look forward to doing so at the appropriate time .
Thank you !
” It was not immediately clear why the president decided to change the policy , or whether he had even been aware of it ahead of time .
But White House staff members who work in close quarters with him had been told that they were scheduled to receive injections of the coronavirus vaccine soon , two people familiar with the distribution plans said .
The goal of distributing the vaccine in the West Wing was to prevent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the final weeks of the Trump administration .
The hope was to eventually distribute the vaccine to everyone who works in the White House , one of the people said .
It was not clear how many doses were being allocated to the White House or how many were needed , since many staff members had already tested positive for the virus and recovered .
While many Trump officials said they were eager to receive the vaccine and would take it if it were offered , others said they were concerned it would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appear as if Trump staff members were hopping the line to protect a president who has already recovered from the virus and bragged that he is now “ immune.
” Vaccine deployment is now underway across the country .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
18,308 views
The CEO of Pfizer has announced that he will NOT be taking the COVID-19…
For now, that is.
Albert Bourla insists he is waiting on taking the vaccine so that healthcare workers can get it first.
Specifically, the Independent reports that Bourla said:
I’m 59 years old, in good health, I’m not working in the front line. So, my type is not recommended to get vaccinated… So, none of the executives or board members will cut the line, they will take it as their age and occupation type is.
This is not a good look coming from the CEO of a company that developed the vaccine.
Many people are worried about the safety of a vaccine that has been developed quickly.
To be clear, the clinical trials and studies appear to suggest that the vaccine is safe and effective.
But with so much doubt…
Why wouldn’t the CEO of the company itself take the vaccine to prove that the vaccine is safe and effective?
It’s an odd look.
Many on social media have already taken notice:
See this shit here!!! CEO said he not taking it right now he a healthy 59 year old 😂😂😂 Dude knows that vaccine ain’t no good … #Pfizer y’all ain’t fooling nobody pic.twitter.com/FuGI1Bp7df — only for black born americans (@ANP457475) December 15, 2020
Pfizer's CEO when they asked him to take his own vaccine… pic.twitter.com/QbPy7Fmpoz — SuperBlackman (@OVOBheedie) December 14, 2020
The Pfizer CEO hasn't taken the COVID vaccine yet? Again, I'm gonna pass on getting my shot.https://t.co/YML55lxIzZ — Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) December 15, 2020
Me As Pfizer CEO Omo I no too trust this Vaccine ooo. Make I lie say I no want 'cut line' pic.twitter.com/WbxG4jcJVY — Prospective Billionaire ✌🏿✌🏿 (@abaidaboss) December 14, 2020
You would think that the CEO of the vaccine company would want to build trust in the vaccine!
But this “publicity stunt” appears to have backfired.
Many people are even more nervous than before about the vaccine.
CNBC has more details on the CEO’s comments:
Monday he and other executives will not “cut the line” as U.S. officials kick off a massive effort to distribute the vaccine across the country. The vaccine, which Pfizer developed in partnership with Germany-based BioNTech, is the first approved for emergency use in the U.S. to prevent Covid-19. The Food and Drug Administration on Friday authorized the vaccine for use in people 16 and older, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Sunday officially recommended its use. However, there are limited doses available and as such, the CDC has recommended states prioritize health-care workers and long-term care residents for initial distribution. While Bourla’s company developed the vaccine, he is not a frontline health-care worker himself. He said he’s also 59 and in relatively good health, so it’s not entirely appropriate for him to receive the vaccine before other people who need it more. If he was vaccinated on camera, he said it might help increase the public’s willingness to receive it, citing Pfizer’s internal research. But he emphasized that “none of the executives and board members will cut the line.” Bourla also urged Americans to “trust science” and encouraged people to get vaccinated when appropriate, based on their age and occupation. “This is a vaccine that was developed without cutting corners from a company with 171 years of credentials,” Bourla said Monday on “Squawk Box.” “This is a vaccine that was developed in the spotlight, in the daylight, with all the data being put in a server.” Bourla’s comments come as the first deliveries of doses are set to arrive at more than 100 of the country’s 636 pre-determined distribution sites. Some frontline health-care workers are due to be vaccinated as soon as Monday morning and vaccination is set to begin among long-term care residents next week, according to Operation Warp Speed officials. It’s a monumental logistical challenge. The federal government has partnered with UPS, FedEx, McKesson, CVS, Walgreens, among others, to help distribute the vaccine and actually administer it. But state immunization officials have warned that the so-called last-mile delivery of the vaccine will be the most challenging, and states are largely responsible for that effort. State officials have repeatedly called on the federal government to provide more funding to hasten the effort.
In order to get the public on board, leaders will need to get vaccinated.
Even if Bourla is being authentic, it’s not a good look for the CEO.
Especially in an age where people are worried about the substances they are putting into their body.
Why the CEO of @pfizer wouldn't take the vaccine? Millions of Americans are about to receive #Covid19Vaccine … Yet the man at the helm of the pharmaceutical who produced the vaccine has NOT taken it? What is he waiting for? A committee to decide? pic.twitter.com/mZCfHC5GsS — Trish Regan (@trish_regan) December 14, 2020
That’s great. Just out of curiosity, which country was it that developed the vaccine? Wonder why. https://t.co/tv8CjuyqTN — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) December 12, 2020
The news of Bourla’s comments comes just a day after President Trump reversed a plan to get the White House staff vaccinated.
Initially, the White House staff would be one of the first vaccinated.
Now, that plan has been rescinded thanks to President Trump.
The New York Times has more details:
President Trump said on Sunday night that he would delay a plan for senior White House staff members to receive the coronavirus vaccine in the coming days, hours after The New York Times reported that the administration was planning to rapidly distribute the vaccine to its staff at a time when the first doses are generally being reserved for high-risk health care workers. Mr. Trump, who tested positive for the coronavirus in October and recovered after being hospitalized, also implied that he would get the vaccine himself at some point in the future, but said he had no immediate plans to do so. NATIONAL POLL: Do You Still Support President Trump? “People working in the White House should receive the vaccine somewhat later in the program, unless specifically necessary,” Mr. Trump tweeted, hours after a National Security Council spokesman had defended the plan. “I have asked that this adjustment be made. I am not scheduled to take the vaccine, but look forward to doing so at the appropriate time. Thank you!” It was not immediately clear why the president decided to change the policy, or whether he had even been aware of it ahead of time. But White House staff members who work in close quarters with him had been told that they were scheduled to receive injections of the coronavirus vaccine soon, two people familiar with the distribution plans said. The goal of distributing the vaccine in the West Wing was to prevent additional government officials from falling ill in the final weeks of the Trump administration. The hope was to eventually distribute the vaccine to everyone who works in the White House, one of the people said. It was not clear how many doses were being allocated to the White House or how many were needed, since many staff members had already tested positive for the virus and recovered. While many Trump officials said they were eager to receive the vaccine and would take it if it were offered, others said they were concerned it would send the wrong message by making it appear as if Trump staff members were hopping the line to protect a president who has already recovered from the virus and bragged that he is now “immune.”
Vaccine deployment is now underway across the country.
This story is developing.


welovetrump--2020-12-15--SCOTUS Sides with Colorado Church Over COVID Attendance Caps

It appears the Supreme Court is finally defending our Constitutional rights .
The Supreme Court has sided with a Colorado church over attendance limitations due to COVID-19 .
The decision was made in a significant 6-3 conservative majority .
Blue states have been limiting attendance at churches across the country .
Critics have pointed out the hypocrisy .
Many of these states allow bars and strip clubs to remain open… But in some cases , they ’ ve limited attendance at churches !
The right to exercise religious freedom is guaranteed by the First Amendment !
Now , it appears @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right .
As a result of this ruling , it appears that the state of Colorado will be forced to lift its caps on church attendance .
CBS News has more details on this case : The Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with a Colorado church challenging the state ’ s capacity restrictions on houses of worship during the coronavirus pandemic , the latest order from the high court , now with a 6-3 conservative majority , in favor of churches and synagogues seeking to hold worship services during the ongoing crisis .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the high court tossed out an August decision from the federal district court in Colorado that kept the attendance limits in place and sent the dispute back to the lower courts for further consideration in light of its November order barring New York from enforcing capacity restrictions at houses of worship .
In that case , the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of churches and synagogues that argued New York Governor Andrew Cuomo ’ s limitations on attendance at religious institutions in coronavirus hotspots were unconstitutional .
Justice Elena Kagan , joined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dissented in the Colorado case , writing it is moot because Colorado lifted the attendance limits in response to the Supreme Court ’ s ruling in the challenge to New York ’ s coronavirus restrictions .
“ Absent our issuing different guidance , there is no reason to think Colorado will reverse course — and so no reason to think Harvest Church will again face capacity limits , ” Kagan wrote .
“ When ‘ subsequent events ’ thus show that a challenged action can not ‘ reasonably be expected to recur , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over .
” In a similar case involving New Jersey ’ s limits on attendance at houses of worship , the Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered the lower courts to revisit the dispute in light of its decision blocking the restrictions in the New York case .
The dispute over the capacity restrictions was brought by High Plains Harvest Church , a church in Ault , Colorado , and its pastor , Mark Hotaling .
Colorado capped attendance at houses of worship to 25 % of their posted occupancy limit , not to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ zones as part of its efforts to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus .
But the church argued the limitations violated the First Amendment and claimed the state was discriminating against religious gatherings in favor of secular gatherings .
But the federal district court in August and the 10th U.S .
Circuit Court of Appeals in November declined to block enforcement of the capacity restrictions .
In its filing with the Supreme Court asking it to lift the cap , High Plains Harvest Church said “ it is difficult to imagine more blatantly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of secular gatherings.
” “ Applicants feel as though they have stepped through the looking glass into a world where the right to shop for gardening supplies is a favored activity , while meeting as a body to worship God corporately has been relegated to the category of unnecessary of even superfluous , ” lawyers for the church wrote in their request .
It is now being reported that Colorado is categorizing all houses of worship as critical and “ essential businesses.
” This suggests that churches will be able to remain open @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this Supreme Court decision , there will not be limitations on peoples ’ ability to practice their faith !
Now that the Supreme Court has ruled on the Colorado case , will other blue states follow suit ?
Colorado isn ’ t the only state that has limited the ability to exercise religious freedom .
The Washington Examiner confirms that the state of Colorado has now dropped restrictions due to the Supreme Court ruling : Colorado Gov .
Jared Polis on Wednesday said that the Supreme Court ’ s decision in a New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restrictions on houses of worship .
In a brief filed to the court , attorneys for Polis responded to a suit raised by High Plains Harvest Church , which was seeking injunctive relief from his 50 % capacity limit on churches .
Polis urged the court to dismiss the case , pointing to the fact that his administration removed all limitations on the church this week .
“ After careful consideration and consultation with counsel , Colorado amended its public health order to ensure that it complied with the Court ’ s free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restrictions from houses of worship , no matter which level of the public health order dial applies in a particular county , ” attorneys wrote .
“ Houses of worship remain categorized as critical businesses in Colorado — but now with no more , or different , restrictions than any other critical business.
” Colorado ’ s reversal comes shortly after the court signaled a major change in its attitude toward houses of worship seeking relief from state and local restrictions .
The Supreme Court shortly before Thanksgiving decided in favor of Catholic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gov .
Andrew Cuomo of violating the First Amendment by implementing heavier restrictions on churches and synagogues than he did on businesses .
That decision , in which Justice Amy Coney Barrett was the decisive vote , paved the way for a similar decision favoring California churches and opened the door for appeals from churches in New Jersey and Nevada .
Barrett ’ s vote changed the consensus reached this summer in rulings against two churches in California and Nevada seeking injunctions against gathering restrictions .
In both cases , Chief Justice John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ churches .
NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Support President Trump ?
It appears that common sense and Constitutionality are coming back to America .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
1,241 views
Finally!
It appears the Supreme Court is finally defending our Constitutional rights.
The Supreme Court has sided with a Colorado church over attendance limitations due to COVID-19.
The decision was made in a significant 6-3 conservative majority.
Blue states have been limiting attendance at churches across the country.
Critics have pointed out the hypocrisy.
Many of these states allow bars and strip clubs to remain open…
But in some cases, they’ve limited attendance at churches!
The right to exercise religious freedom is guaranteed by the First Amendment!
Now, it appears that the Supreme Court is defending that right.
More details below:
NEW: The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled in favor of a northern Colorado church that sued Gov. Jared Polis over capacity limits on religious gatherings, reiterating a stance the highest court took in a similar case last month.https://t.co/xWKrbmLYe7 — The Denver Post (@denverpost) December 15, 2020
The Supreme Court has sided with a Colorado church challenging the state's capacity limits for houses of worship. Justice Kagan leads the liberal trio in dissent, arguing the case is moot. #SCOTUS pic.twitter.com/S2gIv4BLxR — Kevin Daley 🏛 (@KevinDaleyDC) December 15, 2020
As a result of this ruling, it appears that the state of Colorado will be forced to lift its caps on church attendance.
CBS News has more details on this case:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with a Colorado church challenging the state’s capacity restrictions on houses of worship during the coronavirus pandemic, the latest order from the high court, now with a 6-3 conservative majority, in favor of churches and synagogues seeking to hold worship services during the ongoing crisis. In an order with three dissents, the high court tossed out an August decision from the federal district court in Colorado that kept the attendance limits in place and sent the dispute back to the lower courts for further consideration in light of its November order barring New York from enforcing capacity restrictions at houses of worship. In that case, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of churches and synagogues that argued New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s limitations on attendance at religious institutions in coronavirus hotspots were unconstitutional. Justice Elena Kagan, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer dissented in the Colorado case, writing it is moot because Colorado lifted the attendance limits in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in the challenge to New York’s coronavirus restrictions. “Absent our issuing different guidance, there is no reason to think Colorado will reverse course — and so no reason to think Harvest Church will again face capacity limits,” Kagan wrote. “When ‘subsequent events’ thus show that a challenged action cannot ‘reasonably be expected to recur,’ a case is well and truly over. ” In a similar case involving New Jersey’s limits on attendance at houses of worship, the Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered the lower courts to revisit the dispute in light of its decision blocking the restrictions in the New York case. The dispute over the capacity restrictions was brought by High Plains Harvest Church, a church in Ault, Colorado, and its pastor, Mark Hotaling. Colorado capped attendance at houses of worship to 25% of their posted occupancy limit, not to exceed 50 people, in specific geographic zones as part of its efforts to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus. But the church argued the limitations violated the First Amendment and claimed the state was discriminating against religious gatherings in favor of secular gatherings. But the federal district court in August and the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in November declined to block enforcement of the capacity restrictions. In its filing with the Supreme Court asking it to lift the cap, High Plains Harvest Church said “it is difficult to imagine more blatantly unconstitutional discrimination against religious gatherings in favor of secular gatherings.” “Applicants feel as though they have stepped through the looking glass into a world where the right to shop for gardening supplies is a favored activity, while meeting as a body to worship God corporately has been relegated to the category of unnecessary of even superfluous,” lawyers for the church wrote in their request.
It is now being reported that Colorado is categorizing all houses of worship as critical and “essential businesses.”
This suggests that churches will be able to remain open during the pandemic.
And now… with this Supreme Court decision, there will not be limitations on peoples’ ability to practice their faith!
On Monday, Colorado reclassified houses of worship as “critical businesses,” exempting them from capacity limits that non-essential businesses are subject to. https://t.co/Fu9D6iGj1K — Catholic News Agency (@cnalive) December 10, 2020
This is a step in the right direction. What we need to do is let them do fully as they please.https://t.co/9vQ654s3Ym — Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) December 9, 2020
Now that the Supreme Court has ruled on the Colorado case, will other blue states follow suit?
Colorado isn’t the only state that has limited the ability to exercise religious freedom.
The Washington Examiner confirms that the state of Colorado has now dropped restrictions due to the Supreme Court ruling:
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis on Wednesday said that the Supreme Court’s decision in a New York case prompted him to drop coronavirus restrictions on houses of worship. In a brief filed to the court, attorneys for Polis responded to a suit raised by High Plains Harvest Church, which was seeking injunctive relief from his 50% capacity limit on churches. Polis urged the court to dismiss the case, pointing to the fact that his administration removed all limitations on the church this week. “After careful consideration and consultation with counsel, Colorado amended its public health order to ensure that it complied with the Court’s free exercise framework by removing all numerical capacity restrictions from houses of worship, no matter which level of the public health order dial applies in a particular county,” attorneys wrote. “Houses of worship remain categorized as critical businesses in Colorado — but now with no more, or different, restrictions than any other critical business.” 99.9% Pure Investor Grade Silver Trump Collector Coins! Colorado’s reversal comes shortly after the court signaled a major change in its attitude toward houses of worship seeking relief from state and local restrictions. The Supreme Court shortly before Thanksgiving decided in favor of Catholic churches and Jewish synagogues accusing New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo of violating the First Amendment by implementing heavier restrictions on churches and synagogues than he did on businesses. That decision, in which Justice Amy Coney Barrett was the decisive vote, paved the way for a similar decision favoring California churches and opened the door for appeals from churches in New Jersey and Nevada. Barrett’s vote changed the consensus reached this summer in rulings against two churches in California and Nevada seeking injunctions against gathering restrictions. In both cases, Chief Justice John Roberts cast a swing vote against the churches.
Finally…
It appears that common sense and Constitutionality are coming back to America.
We hope this trend continues!


welovetrump--2020-12-15--Hillary Calls For Electoral College to be Abolished After Casting Her NY Electoral Vote for Biden

Hillary Clinton just cast her NY electoral vote for Joe Biden .
That ’ s no surprise of course .
@ @ @ @ @ she jumped on Twitter and once again , called for it to be abolished .
@ @ @ @ @ abolish the Electoral College and select our president by the winner of the popular vote @ @ @ @ @ office.
” She followed that up with this : “ But while it still exists @ @ @ @ @ cast my vote in New York for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
” I ’ @ @ @ @ @ Hillary , if not also jeoulous that you ’ re still not president .

Hillary Clinton just cast her NY electoral vote for Joe Biden.
That’s no surprise of course.
Right after doing so, she jumped on Twitter and once again, called for it to be abolished.
Clinton tweeted:
“I believe we should abolish the Electoral College and select our president by the winner of the popular vote, same as every other office.”
She followed that up with this:
“But while it still exists, I was proud to cast my vote in New York for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.”
I’ll bet you are proud Hillary, if not also jeoulous that you’re still not president.


welovetrump--2020-12-15--Rep. Elise Stefanik Of New York Calls For Investigation Of Cuomo’s Alleged Sexual Harassment Of Form

Rep. Elise Stefanik Of New York Calls For Investigation Of Cuomo’s Alleged Sexual Harassment Of Former Aide

I have said it before and I will say it again : Andrew Cuomo is one of the three people @ @ @ @ @ , along with De Blasio and Newsom which are hell bent on tearing down America @ @ @ @ @ totalitarian , statist regime .
His views on the role of government are appalling , @ @ @ @ @ of women .
The New York Governor , has recently been called out by a @ @ @ @ @ harassment , and now at least one Congresswoman is calling for further investigation Here is @ @ @ @

I have said it before and I will say it again:
Andrew Cuomo is one of the three people in The Axis of Evil, along with De Blasio and Newsom which are hell bent on tearing down America and replacing it with a totalitarian, statist regime.
His views on the role of government are appalling, and so is his treatment of women.
The New York Governor, has recently been called out by a former aide for alleged sexual harassment, and now at least one Congresswoman is calling for further investigation
Here is what we know:


welovetrump--2020-12-15--Democrats Are Seeking To Destroy The Religious Freedoms President Trump Advanced, Replacing Them Wit

Democrats Are Seeking To Destroy The Religious Freedoms President Trump Advanced, Replacing Them With Marxist Beliefs

There are two places that immediatly come to mind when I think of a lack of religious freedom .
The other is Marxist Russia , more commonly known as The Soviet Union .
Neither of these places are exactly bastions of peace and prosperity .
In fact one is not even around anymore , because Marxism is simply not a sustainable philosophy .
The other only trudges along , because they have adopted our western capitalism , while stealing our western inventions , again Marxism and communism are not sustainable beleifs .
Democrats , who are now a Marxist party @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very simple premise , choosing instead to fully embrace Marxism and identitarian politics .
Many in the party are now calling for religious freedoms advanced under President Trump , to be rolled back , citing them “ as a national security risk.
” Now , I am not a religious man , but i do know this : wherever they may seek to replace God with the State , the people suffer , the country collapses , and there is nothing left but a bleak and endless grey .
Here is what people @ @ @

There are two places that immediatly come to mind when I think of a lack of religious freedom.
One is Communist China.
The other is Marxist Russia, more commonly known as The Soviet Union.
Neither of these places are exactly bastions of peace and prosperity. In fact one is not even around anymore, because Marxism is simply not a sustainable philosophy.
The other only trudges along, because they have adopted our western capitalism, while stealing our western inventions, again Marxism and communism are not sustainable beleifs.
Democrats, who are now a Marxist party, do not seem to understand this very simple premise, choosing instead to fully embrace Marxism and identitarian politics.
Many in the party are now calling for religious freedoms advanced under President Trump, to be rolled back, citing them “as a national security risk.”
Now, I am not a religious man, but i do know this: wherever they may seek to replace God with the State, the people suffer, the country collapses, and there is nothing left but a bleak and endless grey.
Here is what people are saying:


welovetrump--2020-12-15--Joy Behar: “I Think We’ve Been Respectful to Melania”

Whenever they think they get what they want , leftists re-write history by pretending that they ’ ve been decent @ @ @ @ @ during the latter ’ s leadership .
The ladies on the View are notorious for @ @ @ @ @ an attempt to fend off conservative criticism of Jill Biden , Joy Behar just made @ @ @ @ @ full fledged lie .
In regards to the left-wing media ’ s treatment of First @ @ @ @ @ said “ I think we ’ ve been respectful to Melania .
”

This is a classic leftist move.
Whenever they think they get what they want, leftists re-write history by pretending that they’ve been decent and respectful to their opposition during the latter’s leadership.
The ladies on the View are notorious for using this tactic.
In an attempt to fend off conservative criticism of Jill Biden, Joy Behar just made a claim that is a full fledged lie.
In regards to the left-wing media’s treatment of First Lady Melania Trump, Behar said “I think we’ve been respectful to Melania.”
Really now Joy?


welovetrump--2020-12-16--How Long Will You Continue To “Mask up” Before You Say NO MORE?

It ’ s Noah here and I have a question for you .
How long are you willing to be a good little citizen and “ mask up ” … .
Have you ever thought of it ?
They ’ ve got you so sidetracked about the “ greater good ” that you ’ ve probably forgotten how this all started .
Remember two weeks to flatten the curve ?
That ’ s how it always happens .
How do you boil a frog ?
And I ’ m afraid that by the time everyone finally wakes up and says @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
How long will you continue to mask up ?
How long will you continue to breathe your own carbon dioxide all day ?
How long will you continue to give yourself bad breath and “ mask rot ” in your mouth ?
How long will you take all emotion and human connection out of society ?
In other words , this : Our Founding Fathers would have hung these bastards by now .
And we don ’ t even have the courage to slip the mask off .
To quote a man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Come on , man !
” So I ’ m asking you to please tell me your personal opinion : NATIONAL POLL : How long will you continue to wear a mask before you REFUSE To Continue Wearing One ?
There is an option for “ OTHER ” where you can type in your own answer if you don ’ t see it listed .
BOOKMARK IT : Check Out My New Site , NoahReport.com !
I will publish all the results later tonight .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
8,711 views
Hey friends,
It’s Noah here and I have a question for you.
How long are you willing to be a good little citizen and “mask up”….
Have you ever thought of it?
They’ve got you so sidetracked about the “greater good” that you’ve probably forgotten how this all started.
Remember two weeks to flatten the curve?
Well:
That’s how it always happens.
How do you boil a frog?
Slowly.
One degree at a time.
And I’m afraid that by the time everyone finally wakes up and says no more, we might be boiled.
So I’m asking you….
How long will you continue to mask up?
How long will you continue to breathe your own carbon dioxide all day?
How long will you continue to give yourself bad breath and “mask rot” in your mouth?
How long will you take all emotion and human connection out of society?
In other words, this:
Our Founding Fathers would have hung these bastards by now.
And we don’t even have the courage to slip the mask off.
To quote a man who will never be President: “Come on, man!”
So I’m asking you to please tell me your personal opinion:
NATIONAL POLL: How long will you continue to wear a mask before you REFUSE To Continue Wearing One?
There is an option for “OTHER” where you can type in your own answer if you don’t see it listed.
Vote here….👇
Thank you!
I will publish all the results later tonight.
Check back.


welovetrump--2020-12-16--San Fransico Committee Wants To Remove Abraham Lincoln’s Name Claims “Black Lives Didn’t Matter To H

San Fransico Committee Wants To Remove Abraham Lincoln’s Name Claims “Black Lives Didn’t Matter To Him”

Cancel Culture strikes again and this time their coming for Honest Abe .
A San Fransico Committee is recommending former President Abraham Lincoln ’ s name be removed from a San Fransico highschool due to his alleged treatment of Native Americans .
The chairman of the committee Jeremiah Jefferies even went as far to say “ Lincoln , did not show through policy or rhetoric that Black lives ever mattered to them outside of human capital and as casualties of wealth building.
” Lincoln literally made the Emancipation Proclamation that freed slaves but “ black lives never mattered to him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and had this to say : A San Francisco committee is recommending the removal of former President Abraham Lincoln ’ s name from a high school due to his past treatment of Native Americans .
Lincoln High School was one of many that the San Francisco School Names Advisory Committee found to have a problematic title , according to the San Francisco Chronicle .
Others included George Washington High School , Herbert Hoover Middle School and Paul Revere K-8 .
Lincoln famously led the Union ’ s defeat of the Confederacy in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which freed slaves in southern states .
Jefferies told the Chronicle that “ Lincoln , like the presidents before him and most after , did not show through policy or rhetoric that Black lives ever mattered to them outside of human capital and as casualties of wealth building.
” Lincoln has come under fire for constructing the transcontinental railroad , which affected indigenous lands .
He also declined to commute the sentences of 39 Native Americans who were sentenced to hanging .
Thirty-eight were ultimately hanged in a mass execution after one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Daily Mail chipped in too : San Francisco district is planning to rename a school named after Abraham Lincoln because the former president did not demonstrate that ‘ black lives mattered to him ’ .
The president , who is often held up as an American hero for abolishing slavery , is just one of 44 historical figures soon to have their names scratched off schools within the San Francisco Unified School District .
NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Have Trump 's Back 100 % ?
It ’ s clear the far @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a new America .
Abraham Lincoln used to be a figure all people could look up to no matter what their political affliation was and now it looks like the left has to cancel him too .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
2,187 views
Cancel Culture strikes again and this time their coming for Honest Abe.
A San Fransico Committee is recommending former President Abraham Lincoln’s name be removed from a San Fransico highschool due to his alleged treatment of Native Americans.
The chairman of the committee Jeremiah Jefferies even went as far to say “Lincoln, did not show through policy or rhetoric that Black lives ever mattered to them outside of human capital and as casualties of wealth building.”
Lincoln literally made the Emancipation Proclamation that freed slaves but “black lives never mattered to him”.
Give us break!
San Francisco to rename Abraham Lincoln High School because former president did not demonstrate that 'black lives mattered to him' https://t.co/EhjC0uD5pC — Daily Mail US (@DailyMail) December 15, 2020
Abraham Lincoln’s Name To Be Removed From San Francisco School As He Did Not Show That Black Lives Mattered To Himhttps://t.co/rIbJQpklLU — Swarajya (@SwarajyaMag) December 16, 2020
If the Emancipation Declaration isn't sufficient to demonstrate that black lives mattered to ABRAHAM LINCOLN then is it *just possible* that the bar has deliberately set so high that nothing will satisfy critics? https://t.co/qGkDaXodLt — The Real O'Neil (@NeilView) December 16, 2020
Fox News covered the insanity and had this to say:
A San Francisco committee is recommending the removal of former President Abraham Lincoln’s name from a high school due to his past treatment of Native Americans. Lincoln High School was one of many that the San Francisco School Names Advisory Committee found to have a problematic title, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. Others included George Washington High School, Herbert Hoover Middle School and Paul Revere K-8. Lincoln famously led the Union’s defeat of the Confederacy in the Civil War and signed the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed slaves in southern states. Jefferies told the Chronicle that “Lincoln, like the presidents before him and most after, did not show through policy or rhetoric that Black lives ever mattered to them outside of human capital and as casualties of wealth building.” Lincoln has come under fire for constructing the transcontinental railroad, which affected indigenous lands. He also declined to commute the sentences of 39 Native Americans who were sentenced to hanging. Thirty-eight were ultimately hanged in a mass execution after one was granted a last-minute reprieve.
I am just sick and tired of people destroying history San Francisco committee wants to remove Abraham Lincoln's name from high schoolhttps://t.co/stKoc9dxJj — PATRIOT SHIRLEY/TRUMP2024 (@Shirley36474465) December 16, 2020
The Daily Mail chipped in too:
San Francisco district is planning to rename a school named after Abraham Lincoln because the former president did not demonstrate that ‘black lives mattered to him’. The president, who is often held up as an American hero for abolishing slavery, is just one of 44 historical figures soon to have their names scratched off schools within the San Francisco Unified School District.
It’s clear the far left wants to rewrite history and create a new America.
Abraham Lincoln used to be a figure all people could look up to no matter what their political affliation was and now it looks like the left has to cancel him too.


welovetrump--2020-12-16--Welcome To The Future: NYPD Introduces Their New Robot Dog

This looks like something straight out of a sci-fi movie .
The New York Police Department has recently released videos of its new Robot Dog named Digidog .
It ’ s reported that the robot dog is able to use its artificial intelligence to navigate things and use its built-in cameras to give police officers eyes in places where it would be too dangerous to go themselves .
Digidog was put to the test already in October , when officers used it for the first time when a man in Brooklyn barricaded himself in the house with a gun .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ policing yourself : ABC 7 News covered the story and shared these details about NYPD ’ s new addition to the force : Eyewitness News got an exclusive look at a new tool the NYPD has at its disposal for responding to emergency situations .
“ This dog is going to save lives , protect people , and protect officers and that ’ s our goal , ” NYPD Technical Assistance Response Unit Inspector Frank Digiacomo said .
It weighs in at 70 pounds and is able to run about three and a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ climb stairs .
“ This robot is able to use its artificial intelligence to navigate things , very complex environments , ” NYPD TARU ’ s Deepu John said .
John , one of many officers trained to operate the robot dog , says it ’ s as simple as playing a video game .
It ’ s covered with cameras and lights which allows police to get a real-time look at things .
It has actually bee used too , see what the New York Post had to add about the Robot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spot ended with one combatant ’ s wife getting accidentally shot — and cops later deployed a robot “ dog ” when the gunman holed up in a nearby basement , according to police sources and photos from the scene .
The NYPD ’ s Emergency Services Unit responded , along with the robot — developed by Boston Dynamics and known as Spot , photos from the scene show .
The Robot Dog was created by Boston Dynamics and they not only have a Robot Dog but they robots in human shape form @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Still Support President Trump ?
Just take a look : Most technology is intended for good but it seems like it always gets misused .
Let ’ s hope these AI robots don ’ t get too smart and into the wrong hands because then we ’ ll have a big problem .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
2,190 views
This looks like something straight out of a sci-fi movie.
The New York Police Department has recently released videos of its new Robot Dog named Digidog.
It’s reported that the robot dog is able to use its artificial intelligence to navigate things and use its built-in cameras to give police officers eyes in places where it would be too dangerous to go themselves.
Digidog was put to the test already in October, when officers used it for the first time when a man in Brooklyn barricaded himself in the house with a gun.
Take a look at the future of policing yourself:
Exclusive: A look at the NYPD's new robot dog https://t.co/RAR0VkBcjL pic.twitter.com/J301RC4EYJ — Eyewitness News (@ABC7NY) December 11, 2020
ABC 7 News covered the story and shared these details about NYPD’s new addition to the force:
Eyewitness News got an exclusive look at a new tool the NYPD has at its disposal for responding to emergency situations. It’s a robot dog known as “Digidog.” “This dog is going to save lives, protect people, and protect officers and that’s our goal,” NYPD Technical Assistance Response Unit Inspector Frank Digiacomo said. It weighs in at 70 pounds and is able to run about three and a half miles per hour and can even climb stairs. “This robot is able to use its artificial intelligence to navigate things, very complex environments,” NYPD TARU’s Deepu John said. John, one of many officers trained to operate the robot dog, says it’s as simple as playing a video game. It’s covered with cameras and lights which allows police to get a real-time look at things.
THIS IS WILD https://t.co/cUhPWj8dXv — Alex Ciccarone (@AlexABC7NY) December 11, 2020
NYPD deploys robot dog after Brooklyn shooting fight over a parking spot ended with one combatant’s wife getting accidentally shot — and cops later deployed a robot “dog” when the gunman holed up in a nearby basement, according to photos from the scene. https://t.co/1ILp1KLZew — Bill Schrier (@billschrier) October 31, 2020
It has actually bee used too, see what the New York Post had to add about the Robot Dog:
A fight over a parking spot ended with one combatant’s wife getting accidentally shot — and cops later deployed a robot “dog” when the gunman holed up in a nearby basement, according to police sources and photos from the scene. NATIONAL POLL: Do You Trust Fox News? The NYPD’s Emergency Services Unit responded, along with the robot — developed by Boston Dynamics and known as Spot, photos from the scene show.
The Robot Dog was created by Boston Dynamics and they not only have a Robot Dog but they robots in human shape form too.
Just take a look:
Most technology is intended for good but it seems like it always gets misused.
Let’s hope these AI robots don’t get too smart and into the wrong hands because then we’ll have a big problem.


welovetrump--2020-12-16--ILLEGAL: Facebook and Twitter Caught Donating To Biden While Blocking Hunter Story, Massive FEC Viol

ILLEGAL: Facebook and Twitter Caught Donating To Biden While Blocking Hunter Story, Massive FEC Violation?

Big Tech is getting exposed for their supposedly “ non-bias ” approach to the 2020 election .
Reports have come out that Facebook and Twitter executives have poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into the Biden campaign .
Their donations came around the same time Conservative voices were being censored for reporting the Hunter Biden story .
Federal Election Commission reports show Facebook ’ s vice president of public policy Erin Egan gave close to $ 100,000 around the same time the Hunter Biden story was being censored .
The FEC ( Federal Election Commission ) should lay down the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ due to the fact their donations and actions from both companies ’ executives show that they clearly had a special interest in one political candidate and censored accordingly .
The New York Post broke the story exclusively : Facebook and Twitter executives poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into Joe Biden ’ s presidential campaign , all while blocking the New York Post ’ s exposé about Hunter Biden ’ s overseas business dealings .
The revelation comes amid accusations from President Trump and other Republicans that Silicon Valley is censoring conservative voices @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to lose their liability protections .
A review of Federal Election Commission records show Facebook ’ s vice president of public policy and chief privacy officer , Erin Egan , donated $ 99,440.01 to Democrats and Biden in the final weeks of the race .
Egan donated the maximum contribution of $ 2,800 to the former veep ’ s White House bid on Sept. 8 and Oct. 1 before ponying up a whopping $ 55,000 for the Biden Victory Fund and $ 35,500 for the Democratic National Committee .
Fox News covered the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Top executives at Facebook and Twitter donated tens of thousands of dollars to President-elect Joe Biden ’ s campaign , Federal Election Commission records reviewed by Fox News reveal , as the social media platforms come under fire for limiting the circulation of reports surrounding Hunter Biden ’ s business dealings in the weeks leading up to Election Day .
A Fox News review of FEC records shows that top executives at the social media companies made large donations to the Biden campaign , including several who gave the legal maximum of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Facebook vice president of public policy , Erin Egan , donated $ 2,800 to Biden ’ s campaign on Oct. 1 , in addition to the $ 2,800 she donated to the campaign during the Democratic primaries .
Facebook chief revenue officer David Fischer donated $ 2,800 to Biden during the primary , and an additional $ 750 during the general election , according to FEC records .
Over at Twitter , vice president Matt Derella donated $ 2,000 to Biden ’ s campaign in September .
And the executives were not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Twitter and Facebook employees with “ manager ” or “ director ” in their titles donated at least $ 1,000 to Biden ’ s campaign .
Newly appointed Attorney General Jeff Rosen has a history of dealing with Big Tech companies .
In October , Rosen led the Department of Justice ’ s antitrust case against Google .
Hopefully , Rosen will step up to the plate and prosecute the communist operatives that have overtaken Facebook and Twitter too .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
12,090 views
Big Tech is getting exposed for their supposedly “non-bias” approach to the 2020 election.
Reports have come out that Facebook and Twitter executives have poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into the Biden campaign.
Their donations came around the same time Conservative voices were being censored for reporting the Hunter Biden story.
Federal Election Commission reports show Facebook’s vice president of public policy Erin Egan gave close to $100,000 around the same time the Hunter Biden story was being censored.
The FEC(Federal Election Commission) should lay down the hammer on both Twitter and Facebook, due to the fact their donations and actions from both companies’ executives show that they clearly had a special interest in one political candidate and censored accordingly.
Facebook, Twitter execs donated big bucks to Biden while blocking Hunter news https://t.co/q79kC7HXA7 pic.twitter.com/6ZSg4IHsRA — New York Post (@nypost) December 15, 2020
Why’s #BigTech trying to cover for Hunter Biden? And why don’t Democrats want to get to the bottom of Hunter’s business dealings? https://t.co/JrbGKP2okR — Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) December 15, 2020
Facebook and Twitter need to be investigated for censoring the Hunter Biden story and all communications that led to their decision to suppress it should be made public. Election Interference by Big Tech cannot be tolerated. — Benny (@bennyjohnson) December 10, 2020
The New York Post broke the story exclusively:
Facebook and Twitter executives poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into Joe Biden’s presidential campaign, all while blocking the New York Post’s exposé about Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings. The revelation comes amid accusations from President Trump and other Republicans that Silicon Valley is censoring conservative voices, sparking a push for the companies to lose their liability protections. A review of Federal Election Commission records show Facebook’s vice president of public policy and chief privacy officer, Erin Egan, donated $99,440.01 to Democrats and Biden in the final weeks of the race. Egan donated the maximum contribution of $2,800 to the former veep’s White House bid on Sept. 8 and Oct. 1 before ponying up a whopping $55,000 for the Biden Victory Fund and $35,500 for the Democratic National Committee.
Of course Silicon Valley billionaires donated to Joe Biden. But their political bias doesn’t end at their checkbooks. By censoring President Trump and news organizations, Big Tech stacked the deck for the Democrat Party and against the American people.https://t.co/K1BizNWKq8 — Senator Ted Cruz (@SenTedCruz) December 15, 2020
The censoring of Hunter Biden articles and photos are soft money donations to the Biden campaign by Twitter & Facebook and should be reported to the FEC. — Alex Marlow (@AlexMarlow) October 15, 2020
Fox News covered the story see what they had to share:
Top executives at Facebook and Twitter donated tens of thousands of dollars to President-elect Joe Biden’s campaign, Federal Election Commission records reviewed by Fox News reveal, as the social media platforms come under fire for limiting the circulation of reports surrounding Hunter Biden’s business dealings in the weeks leading up to Election Day. A Fox News review of FEC records shows that top executives at the social media companies made large donations to the Biden campaign, including several who gave the legal maximum of $2,800. According to FEC records, Facebook vice president of public policy, Erin Egan, donated $2,800 to Biden’s campaign on Oct. 1, in addition to the $2,800 she donated to the campaign during the Democratic primaries. Facebook chief revenue officer David Fischer donated $2,800 to Biden during the primary, and an additional $750 during the general election, according to FEC records. Over at Twitter, vice president Matt Derella donated $2,000 to Biden’s campaign in September. BOOKMARK IT: Check Out My New Site, NoahReport.com! And the executives were not alone. FEC records revealed that dozens of Twitter and Facebook employees with “manager” or “director” in their titles donated at least $1,000 to Biden’s campaign.
Your daily reminder that Twitter & Facebook STIFLED the Hunter Biden laptop story before the election, claiming it was fake news, when actually it was true. — Liz Wheeler (@Liz_Wheeler) December 15, 2020
Candace Owens says Facebook and Twitter 'intervened' in election by 'suppressing' Hunter Biden story https://t.co/dp4coJFWoL — Jessica Kwong (@JessicaGKwong) December 16, 2020
Newly appointed Attorney General Jeff Rosen has a history of dealing with Big Tech companies.
In October, Rosen led the Department of Justice’s antitrust case against Google.
Hopefully, Rosen will step up to the plate and prosecute the communist operatives that have overtaken Facebook and Twitter too.


welovetrump--2020-12-17--Biden Campaign Manager Melts Down: “Bunch of f**kers!”

“ When they go low , we go high !
” I seem to remember someone saying that , now who was it ?
I guess Biden and his team weren ’ t paying much attention because instead of “ going high ” they ’ re just calling you and me a “ bunch of f**kers ” .
You know what it really tells me ?
Because they know the jig is almost up , and Biden will NEVER be president .
“ The president-elect was able to connect with people over this sense of unity .
In the primary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ‘ You think you can work with Republicans ?
’ I ’ m not saying they ’ re not a bunch of f**kers .
Mitch McConnell is terrible , ” she said .
“ But this sense that you couldn ’ t wish for that , you couldn ’ t wish for this bipartisan ideal ?
He rejected that .
From start to finish , he set out with this idea that unity was possible , that together we are stronger , that we , as a country , need healing , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President-elect Joe Biden ’ s incoming deputy chief of staff called GOP lawmakers are “ a bunch of f—ers ” and said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell ( R-Ky. ) is “ terrible , ” but expressed optimism that the new administration could still work with Republicans to pass legislation .
In a new interview with Glamour , Jen O ’ Malley Dillon , who also served as Biden ’ s campaign manager , defended Biden from criticism from the left over his insistence that Republicans would warm to the idea of working @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ The president-elect was able to connect with people over this sense of unity , ” O ’ Malley Dillon said .
“ In the primary , people would mock him , like , ‘ You think you can work with Republicans ?
’ I ’ m not saying they ’ re not a bunch of f—ers .
Mitch McConnell is terrible .
But this sense that you couldn ’ t wish for that , you couldn ’ t wish for this bipartisan ideal ?
He rejected that .
From start to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ idea that unity was possible , that together we are stronger , that we , as a country , need healing , and our politics needs that too.
” McConnell ( R-Ky. ) , the Senate majority leader , for the first time on Tuesday recognized Biden ’ s victory over President Trump after the Electoral College certified the election results in all 50 states .
Biden said he called McConnell to thank him for recognizing his victory and said that they had a “ good conversation.
” McConnell and Biden served in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ relationship .
They also cut deals together when Biden was vice president in the Obama administration .
There ’ s a furious battle going on over control of the Senate , which will be determined by two runoff elections in Georgia on Jan. 5 .
But Biden has repeatedly said he can get things done even with a GOP majority in the Senate .
During the primary and general elections , Biden repeatedly insisted that his decades in the Senate and longstanding relationships with some GOP lawmakers would position him to be able @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the left expressed skepticism about this , as McConnell has a reputation for being a political figure and Republicans over the past four years have increasingly become the party of Trump .
Biden spokeswoman defends incoming deputy chief of staff ’ s ‘ spicy… George Clooney : ‘ Just put a f—— mask on ’ O ’ Malley Dillon acknowledged it will be a heavy lift .
“ Which is not to say it is easy .
It is like a relationship .
You can ’ t do politics alone .
If the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the work , then that becomes really hard , ” she said .
Jen O ’ Malley Dillon , who served as President-elect Joe Biden ’ s campaign manager and is slated to serve as his deputy chief of staff in the White House , referred to Republicans as “ f–kers ” in a conversation about working across the political aisle .
In an interview with Glamour , O ’ Malley Dillon said Biden was able to connect with voters through his willingness to work with GOP leaders .
“ The president-elect was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sense of unity , ” she said .
“ In the primary , people would mock him , like , ‘ You think you can work with Republicans ?
’ “ I ’ m not saying they ’ re not a bunch of f–kers , ” she continued .
“ Mitch McConnell is terrible .
But this sense that you couldn ’ t wish for that , you couldn ’ t wish for this bipartisan ideal ?
[ Biden ] rejected that .
From start to finish , he set out with this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ together we are stronger , that we , as a country , need healing , and our politics needs that too.
” On Tuesday , McConnell acknowledged Biden ’ s win for the first time since the election .
Biden called the Senate Majority Leader to thank him , saying “ I told him that while we disagree on a lot of things there are things we can work together on .
We agreed to get together sooner than later .
And I ’ m looking forward to working with him .
”

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
12,921 views
Stay classy Dems!
“When they go low, we go high!”
I seem to remember someone saying that, now who was it?
Oh right, Mike Obama!
I guess Biden and his team weren’t paying much attention because instead of “going high” they’re just calling you and me a “bunch of f**kers”.
Classy.
You know what it really tells me?
They’re losing their cool.
Why?
Because they know the jig is almost up, and Biden will NEVER be president.
THEY. KNOW.
Take a look:
https://twitter.com/LVNancy/status/1339245092926750720
“The president-elect was able to connect with people over this sense of unity. In the primary, people would mock him, like, ‘You think you can work with Republicans?’ I’m not saying they’re not a bunch of f**kers. Mitch McConnell is terrible,” she said. “But this sense that you couldn’t wish for that, you couldn’t wish for this bipartisan ideal? He rejected that. From start to finish, he set out with this idea that unity was possible, that together we are stronger, that we, as a country, need healing, and our politics needs that too.”
From The Hill:
President-elect Joe Biden’s incoming deputy chief of staff called GOP lawmakers are “a bunch of f—ers” and said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is “terrible,” but expressed optimism that the new administration could still work with Republicans to pass legislation. In a new interview with Glamour, Jen O’Malley Dillon, who also served as Biden’s campaign manager, defended Biden from criticism from the left over his insistence that Republicans would warm to the idea of working with him once President Trump leaves office. “The president-elect was able to connect with people over this sense of unity,” O’Malley Dillon said. “In the primary, people would mock him, like, ‘You think you can work with Republicans?’ I’m not saying they’re not a bunch of f—ers. Mitch McConnell is terrible. But this sense that you couldn’t wish for that, you couldn’t wish for this bipartisan ideal? He rejected that. From start to finish, he set out with this idea that unity was possible, that together we are stronger, that we, as a country, need healing, and our politics needs that too.” McConnell (R-Ky.), the Senate majority leader, for the first time on Tuesday recognized Biden’s victory over President Trump after the Electoral College certified the election results in all 50 states. Biden said he called McConnell to thank him for recognizing his victory and said that they had a “good conversation.” McConnell and Biden served in the Senate together and have a decades-long relationship. They also cut deals together when Biden was vice president in the Obama administration. There’s a furious battle going on over control of the Senate, which will be determined by two runoff elections in Georgia on Jan. 5. But Biden has repeatedly said he can get things done even with a GOP majority in the Senate. During the primary and general elections, Biden repeatedly insisted that his decades in the Senate and longstanding relationships with some GOP lawmakers would position him to be able to work with Republicans. Many on the left expressed skepticism about this, as McConnell has a reputation for being a political figure and Republicans over the past four years have increasingly become the party of Trump. Biden spokeswoman defends incoming deputy chief of staff’s ‘spicy…
George Clooney: ‘Just put a f—— mask on’
O’Malley Dillon acknowledged it will be a heavy lift. “Which is not to say it is easy. It is like a relationship. You can’t do politics alone. If the other person is not willing to do the work, then that becomes really hard,” she said.
Incoming Biden WH deputy Chief of Staff Omalley Dillon says she thinks big bipartisan deals are possible even though the Republicans are a “bunch of fuckers” and “mitch McConnell is terrible”https://t.co/1spD5B734q pic.twitter.com/I631xo97nm — Alex Thompson (@AlexThomp) December 16, 2020
Close up:
Thank you Mark:
And you’re a POShttps://t.co/bb9MLUOeCi — Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) December 16, 2020
And from Newsweek:


welovetrump--2020-12-17--A Group of Black Pastors Expose Democrat GA Senate Runoff Candidate Raphael Warnock for Pro-Choice S

A Group of Black Pastors Expose Democrat GA Senate Runoff Candidate Raphael Warnock for Pro-Choice Stance

There ’ s no such thing as a pro-choice pastor .
Real pastors support life and protecting the rights of the unborn .
This type of reality-inverting statement isn ’ t surprising coming from a Marxist poser like Warnock .
He spews nothing but hatred , division , and race-bait .
Warnock stirred up heated debates across the country when he said America was fighting two pandemics , Covid-19 and Covid-1619 .
Nothing more than Critical Race Theory/Project 1619 nonsense that purposely attempts to incite racial division .
That tactic is textbook from the Marxist playbook and it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Other black pastors aren ’ t falling for Warnock ’ s immorality and divisive tactics .
And they ’ re calling him out .
You can read the letter here : If Pastor Warnock cared about systematic racism like he claims , he would research the history of Planned Parenthood .
The wicked organization was founded by eugenicist Margaret Sanger and they still target minority communities .
The Blaze reported on the letter calling out this fraud : A coalition of more than 25 black pastors — mainly from Georgia — recently called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Warnock over his support for abortion ahead of the Peach State ’ s Jan. 5 runoff elections .
In a letter obtained by Fox News and sent last Friday , the pastors said they felt “ compelled to confront ” the reverend after he recently made public comments supporting abortion , which they said represented “ grave errors of judgment and a lapse in pastoral responsibility.
” In November , Warnock tweeted , “ I will always fight for reproductive justice.
” Then in another tweet , he said , “ I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believe that a hospital room is way too small for a woman , her doctor , and the United States government.
” The tweets followed an earlier public statement the reverend made during a podcast interview in which he argued that abortion is an exercise of “ human agency and freedom ” and is “ consistent with ” his beliefs as a minister .
“ Can you in good conscience defend abortion , knowing that abortion kills 474 Black babies for every 1000 live births ?
” the pastors asked .
“ For @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entreat you to reconsider your public advocacy for abortion , ” they concluded .
“ We implore you to uphold the Biblical defense of life and to fight against the systemic racism of abortion.
” It ’ s not the first time that Warnock has been confronted over his support for abortion .
Last week , former NFL coach Tony Dungy questioned Warnock ’ s faith over the issue .
Don ’ t expect Warnock to back down on his pro-choice position .
NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Have Trump 's Back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against the wicked principles of the Democrat Party that he ’ s running on .
But real Christians and protectors of the unborn see right through his horrific rhetoric .
Warnock is nothing but a radical Marxist fraud who ’ s speaking from a pulpit to brainwash naïve believers .
We ’ ll never fall for it .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
1,848 views
Pastor Raphael Warnock tweeted this blasphemous statement last week:
I am a pro-choice pastor. — Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock (@ReverendWarnock) December 9, 2020
There’s no such thing as a pro-choice pastor.
Real pastors support life and protecting the rights of the unborn.
This type of reality-inverting statement isn’t surprising coming from a Marxist poser like Warnock.
He spews nothing but hatred, division, and race-bait.
Warnock stirred up heated debates across the country when he said America was fighting two pandemics, Covid-19 and Covid-1619.
"We've been trying to beat back this virus of racism since 1619 when 20 slaves arrived on the shores of Jamestown, Virginia" "You don't have to be shot down by an officer for racism to kill you," says pastor at the funeral of Rayshard Brookshttps://t.co/nacspVr5Dh pic.twitter.com/t8PWFSlE0K — BBC News (World) (@BBCWorld) June 23, 2020
"…We've also been dealing with what I called in my sermon last week, COVID 1619. It is this virus we've been doing battle with… since the day 50 Africans arrived on the shores of Jamestown, Virginia." @ReverendWarnock pic.twitter.com/lfiObdp80r — Way Too Early with Kasie Hunt (@WayTooEarly) June 8, 2020
Nothing more than Critical Race Theory/Project 1619 nonsense that purposely attempts to incite racial division.
That tactic is textbook from the Marxist playbook and it’s been used in America for decades.
Other black pastors aren’t falling for Warnock’s immorality and divisive tactics.
And they’re calling him out.
You can't water down the Word of God to please man…There’s nothing in Bible that excuses abortion. And there's definitely nothing in the Bible that says MAN or WOMAN should have a CHOICE whether they sin or not. @ReverendWarnock, You are a Pro-Sin pastor! Shame on you! pic.twitter.com/H2F2EQ1rvA — Diante Johnson (@BCFPresident) December 16, 2020
Two Dozen Black Pastors Write Letter To Raphael Warnock Decrying His Abortion Views https://t.co/MvGzPeNXbk pic.twitter.com/yV5DDp7lhf — The Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) December 15, 2020
Over 25 Black Pastors Urge Raphael Warnock to Fight ‘Systemic Racism of Abortion’ https://t.co/vVB7vs3E6B — super czar (@Kristokoff) December 17, 2020
In an open letter, 25 Black pro-life pastors condemn Georgia Senate candidate @ReverendWarnock over his support of #abortion. “Your open advocacy of abortion is a scandal to the faith and to the Black community,” the letter states.https://t.co/1MTtiv3GcJ — The Daily Citizen (@FocusCitizen) December 16, 2020
You can read the letter here:
Black pastors urge US Senate candidate Warnock to repent: "As a Christian pastor & Black leader, you have a duty to denounce the evil of abortion, which kills a disproportionate number of Black children. Your advocacy of abortion is a scandal to the faith" https://t.co/lCKYe3sfpG — TheChurchCatholic (@_ChurchCatholic) December 14, 2020
If Pastor Warnock cared about systematic racism like he claims, he would research the history of Planned Parenthood.
The wicked organization was founded by eugenicist Margaret Sanger and they still target minority communities.
https://twitter.com/RosaryAdvoc8/status/1336513654943064064
Also a lot of people who say “black lives matter” also have no problem supporting an organization (planned parenthood) that was founded by a racist eugenicist and which still targets minority communities. https://t.co/eUF3iklVsB — Inspiring Christendom (@IChristendom) December 12, 2020
Planned Parenthood targets the black community. How much help do they offer women who want to keep their babies or offer them for adoption? None. — ♱🇺🇸⭐Good to Hear ❌🇺🇸♱ (@goodtohear) December 10, 2020
GREAT NEWS: Black pro-lifers have filed a racial discrimination claim against Planned Parenthood because the org targets black mothers and babies. This would be true justice for all. https://t.co/69G0akRmkj — Students for Life of America (@StudentsforLife) October 31, 2020
The Blaze reported on the letter calling out this fraud:
A coalition of more than 25 black pastors — mainly from Georgia — recently called out Democratic Senate candidate Rev. Raphael Warnock over his support for abortion ahead of the Peach State’s Jan. 5 runoff elections. In a letter obtained by Fox News and sent last Friday, the pastors said they felt “compelled to confront” the reverend after he recently made public comments supporting abortion, which they said represented “grave errors of judgment and a lapse in pastoral responsibility.” In November, Warnock tweeted, “I will always fight for reproductive justice.” Then in another tweet, he said, “I’m a pro-choice pastor, and I believe that a hospital room is way too small for a woman, her doctor, and the United States government.” The tweets followed an earlier public statement the reverend made during a podcast interview in which he argued that abortion is an exercise of “human agency and freedom” and is “consistent with” his beliefs as a minister.
The article also states:
“Can you in good conscience defend abortion, knowing that abortion kills 474 Black babies for every 1000 live births?” the pastors asked. “For all of the above reasons, we entreat you to reconsider your public advocacy for abortion,” they concluded. “We implore you to uphold the Biblical defense of life and to fight against the systemic racism of abortion.” STRONG AND COURAGEOUS: Your Children Need This…TAP HERE It’s not the first time that Warnock has been confronted over his support for abortion. Last week, former NFL coach Tony Dungy questioned Warnock’s faith over the issue.
Don’t expect Warnock to back down on his pro-choice position.
Doing so would go against the wicked principles of the Democrat Party that he’s running on.
But real Christians and protectors of the unborn see right through his horrific rhetoric.
Warnock is nothing but a radical Marxist fraud who’s speaking from a pulpit to brainwash naïve believers.
We’ll never fall for it.


welovetrump--2020-12-17--Kim Clement’s Final Word Over America

Kim Clement’s Final Word Over America

Many of you know of Kim Clement .
He was an incredible prophet , who is widely credited with prophesying @ @ @ @ @ MANY years before Trump even announced he was running .
But do you know his @ @ @ @ @ I actually had never heard this before , but it ’ s so powerful .
@ @ @ @ @ to Israel , which happened right before his death .
You know what I found @ @ @ @ @ he and Hank Kunneman sound so similar !
The part about “ I was there @ @ @ @ @ Now a skeptic could say the Hank is just copying Kim but I don ’ @ @ @ @ @ were actually friends and ministered together early on , did you know that ?
Listen @ @ @ @ @ me it doesn ’ t remind you so much of Kim : If you want @ @ @ @ @ Kim said about Donald Trump I have it for you right here .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
50,862 views
Many of you know of Kim Clement.
He was an incredible prophet, who is widely credited with prophesying the presidency of Donald Trump MANY years before Trump even announced he was running.
But do you know his FINAL word over America?
I actually had never heard this before, but it’s so powerful.
This is from his trip to Israel, which happened right before his death.
Enjoy:
You know what I found absolutely fascinating?
How much he and Hank Kunneman sound so similar!
The part about “I was there” is eerily similar.
Now a skeptic could say the Hank is just copying Kim but I don’t think so.
They were actually friends and ministered together early on, did you know that?
It’s true.
Listen to this next and tell me it doesn’t remind you so much of Kim:
If you want to hear more about what Kim said about Donald Trump I have it for you right here.
Enjoy:
And three bonus videos.
From my friend Trey Smith:
And:
And last:
Comments:


welovetrump--2020-12-17--President Trump STILL Has More Paths To Victory Than Joe Biden!

First , ask yourself , how many paths to victory does Joe Biden have ?
I mean paths to the finish line .
Joe Biden only has one…..continue to pray ( to Lucifer , most likely ) that Americans continue to buy the lie that you “ won ” thanks to the MSM pushing their propaganda hard , and continue to pressure judges and justices to refuse to even hear any legal challenge .
As soon as a crack emerges in any part of that plan then his ship takes on water fast .
Multiple different avenues are still in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump victory and the saving of our nation .
Take a look at this : Here ’ s more from my friends at 100percentFdUp : With the media ’ s non-stop efforts to coronate Basement Joe as our next president , and the efforts of activist judges to discredit brave whistleblowers who ’ ve come forward to share their stories of voter fraud and intimidation they witnessed , it ’ s difficult to remain hopeful about President Trump ’ s chances of re-election .
It ’ s hard to imagine good and honest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defeat decades of dirty , organized voter fraud in America .
In one brilliant , heartfelt explanation , Michigan patriot Matt Sealy has given Trump supporters some very good reasons to keep hope alive .
In spite of the many setbacks by unfair court rulings and pushback from the media , Democrats , and RINOs , President Trump still has several paths to victory .
Yesterday , Matt Sealy brilliantly laid out his explanation of why this fight is far from over : The Electoral College votes were sealed and sent by special @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remain sealed until January 6th when the House and Senate will come into a joint session to open the votes .
The media is going to make you believe that it ’ s all over , and Joe Biden is now officially president .
On January 6th , Nancy Pelosi will sit down with the rest of the House members as she has no special power or authority over the hearing… Vice President Mike Pence will have all the authority as president of the Senate for that day and will accept or reject @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the assembly .
Remember… Mike Pence is in full authority that day as written in the Constitution .
The ballots will be certified today , but that means nothing .
The votes will be opened , and at that point , one House member could , and most likely will , raise their hand to object to the Vice President on the state of elector ’ s votes .
That objection could cover fraud or any other reason , and with the seconding of that objection , everything changes .
Everything !
!
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ two hours ( at least ) to debate , then vote .
The vote will be per Senator , with the Vice President being the deciding vote if needed in the Senate , while the vote in the House will only be ONE vote per delegation , per state , not per House member !
!
!
The Republicans have 30 delegation votes compared to the Democrats with 20 delegation votes .
If this scenario runs true , President Trump gets re-elected .
The Democrats , the media , social networks , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and chaos will erupt .
Bigly !
President Trump is trying to do the right thing and go through the courts first , expose all the fraud , but we all knew that none of the courts , even the Supreme Court wanted to touch this issue with a 10-ft pole !
This is why our forefathers were so brilliant because they knew something like this could happen someday .
So , don ’ t listen to the media and all their deception and lies .
All you have to do is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the law , policies , and procedures , in the end , are on our side .
Greg Kelly had even more .
In other words , “ 46 does NOT exist.
” Not now , not ever .
At least until we get to Mike Pence ?
Who ’ s your pick to go after our man Donald ?
My friend Daniel had a lot of additional info that is really helpful .
Here ’ s even more on how it may play out ( looking more and more likely every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ electors have been sent to D.C. ) : Watch this and prepare to have your mind blown : And in case that gets taken down , I have a backup on Rumble .
Here you go : Full Text of the 12th Amendment , from Law.Cornell.edu : The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President , one of whom , at least , shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves ; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the person voted for as Vice-President , and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President , and of all persons voted for as Vice-President , and of the number of votes for each , which lists they shall sign and certify , and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States , directed to the President of the Senate ; –The President of the Senate shall , in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives , open all the certificates and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ person having the greatest number of votes for President , shall be the President , if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed ; and if no person have such majority , then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President , the House of Representatives shall choose immediately , by ballot , the President .
But in choosing the President , the votes shall be taken by states , the representation from each state having one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states , and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice .
And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them , before the fourth day of March next following , then the Vice-President shall act as President , as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President .
The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President , shall be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a majority of the whole number of electors appointed , and if no person have a majority , then from the two highest numbers on the list , the Senate shall choose the Vice-President ; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators , and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice .
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States .
Remember , President Trump has said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ backed down : Does this look like a many ready to concede ?
States allow the popular vote to determine the appointment of electors , but Trump and his allies could use friendly state legislatures and governors to send alternate—or in the case of states with Republican legislatures and Democratic governors , additional—electors .
When the electoral college convenes on Dec. 14 , states with competing electors would cast double their allotted votes , forcing Senate president Mike Pence to figure out what to do with the doubled-up votes .
If Pence threw @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hit 270 , the decision goes to the House .
There , each state delegation gets one vote ; currently , in 27 states , a majority of delegates are Republican .
NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Have Trump 's Back 100 % ?
Congress will open and record the votes of the Electoral College in Washington , DC , on January 6 , 2021 .
But this time when , as per the 12th amendment of the US Constitution , “ the President of the Senate shall , in the presence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , open all the certificates , ” the procedure may not be a simple formality .
Because each house is controlled by a different party , each may approve their own list , or both houses may reject the electors from some states .
The legal framework is so vague that no one outcome can be certain .
In case of a tie , the 12th Amendment states that “ the House of Representatives shall choose immediately , by ballot , the President ” and that “ the votes shall be taken by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ having one vote ” .
As things stand , this method of adding up state representations rather that the individual votes of the 435 representatives would give the Republicans a majority to reelect their candidate .
But everything hinges on the elections in the House and Senate , also on November 3 , since the final decision would be up to the members of the new Congress , to be installed on January 3 , 2021 .
Incidentally , the current Speaker of the House , Nancy Pelosi , is an unparalleled strategist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrats must win on November 3 in order to have not only a seat majority but also a majority of blue states in the House of Representatives .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
35,912 views
Yes, it’s true.
Don’t believe me?
Let’s dig in.
First, ask yourself, how many paths to victory does Joe Biden have?
I don’t mean paths to 270.
I mean paths to the finish line.
Joe Biden only has one…..continue to pray (to Lucifer, most likely) that Americans continue to buy the lie that you “won” thanks to the MSM pushing their propaganda hard, and continue to pressure judges and justices to refuse to even hear any legal challenge.
That’s it.
As soon as a crack emerges in any part of that plan then his ship takes on water fast.
As for President Trump?
Multiple different avenues are still in play, all leading to an ultimate Trump victory and the saving of our nation.
Take a look at this:
ProTrumpNews parleyed. — ProTrumpNews ProTrumpNews Wednesday, December 16, 2020
Here’s more from my friends at 100percentFdUp:
With the media’s non-stop efforts to coronate Basement Joe as our next president, and the efforts of activist judges to discredit brave whistleblowers who’ve come forward to share their stories of voter fraud and intimidation they witnessed, it’s difficult to remain hopeful about President Trump’s chances of re-election. It’s hard to imagine good and honest Americans will prevail in their efforts to defeat decades of dirty, organized voter fraud in America. In one brilliant, heartfelt explanation, Michigan patriot Matt Sealy has given Trump supporters some very good reasons to keep hope alive. In spite of the many setbacks by unfair court rulings and pushback from the media, Democrats, and RINOs, President Trump still has several paths to victory. Yesterday, Matt Sealy brilliantly laid out his explanation of why this fight is far from over: The Electoral College votes were sealed and sent by special carrier to Washington, where they will remain sealed until January 6th when the House and Senate will come into a joint session to open the votes. The media is going to make you believe that it’s all over, and Joe Biden is now officially president. On January 6th, Nancy Pelosi will sit down with the rest of the House members as she has no special power or authority over the hearing… Vice President Mike Pence will have all the authority as president of the Senate for that day and will accept or reject motions to decide the next steps by the assembly. Remember… Mike Pence is in full authority that day as written in the Constitution. The ballots will be certified today, but that means nothing. The votes will be opened, and at that point, one House member could, and most likely will, raise their hand to object to the Vice President on the state of elector’s votes. That objection could cover fraud or any other reason, and with the seconding of that objection, everything changes. Everything!! The House and Senate will divide for two hours (at least) to debate, then vote. The vote will be per Senator, with the Vice President being the deciding vote if needed in the Senate, while the vote in the House will only be ONE vote per delegation, per state, not per House member!!! The Republicans have 30 delegation votes compared to the Democrats with 20 delegation votes. If this scenario runs true, President Trump gets re-elected. The Democrats, the media, social networks, and globalists around the world will come unhinged, and chaos will erupt. Bigly! President Trump is trying to do the right thing and go through the courts first, expose all the fraud, but we all knew that none of the courts, even the Supreme Court wanted to touch this issue with a 10-ft pole! This is why our forefathers were so brilliant because they knew something like this could happen someday. So, don’t listen to the media and all their deception and lies. All you have to do is read the Constitution, and you know that the law, policies, and procedures, in the end, are on our side.
Greg Kelly had even more.
Watch:
ProTrumpNews parleyed. — ProTrumpNews ProTrumpNews Wednesday, December 16, 2020
From Rumble:
In other words, “46 does NOT exist.”
Not now, not ever.
At least until we get to Mike Pence?
Or Ivanka?
Or Don Jr.?
Who’s your pick to go after our man Donald?
My friend Daniel had a lot of additional info that is really helpful.
Watch:
Here’s even more on how it may play out (looking more and more likely every day, now that two slates of electors have been sent to D.C.):
Watch this and prepare to have your mind blown:
And in case that gets taken down, I have a backup on Rumble.
Too important to miss.
Here you go:
Full Text of the 12th Amendment, from Law.Cornell.edu:
12th Amendment Amendment XII The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;–The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;–the person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
Remember, President Trump has said he WON and he hasn’t backed down:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325099845045071873?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1325099845045071873%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcms.qz.com%2Fembed-sandbox%2F1928848%2Ftwitter.com%2FrealDonaldTrump%2Fstatus%2F1325099845045071873
Does this look like a many ready to concede?
Nope!
And from CNBC:
He then offered an answer to the question many have been asking: What if Trump refuses to ever concede? “He may never concede; he doesn’t have to concede,” Yoo said. “The thing about the American Constitution is that it doesn’t actually require the sitting president to do anything one way or the other. On January 20th, Donald Trump’s term ends and Joe Biden’s, I believe, will begin.”
QZ.com confirms how the 12th Amendment works:
PRAYER CHAIN FOR TRUMP: Please add your name and a prayer to support our President! States allow the popular vote to determine the appointment of electors, but Trump and his allies could use friendly state legislatures and governors to send alternate—or in the case of states with Republican legislatures and Democratic governors, additional—electors. When the electoral college convenes on Dec. 14, states with competing electors would cast double their allotted votes, forcing Senate president Mike Pence to figure out what to do with the doubled-up votes. If Pence threw out the extra votes and neither candidate hit 270, the decision goes to the House. There, each state delegation gets one vote; currently, in 27 states, a majority of delegates are Republican. (For a trip down memory lane: Back in 2000, Florida’s Republican legislature was on the cusp of appointing new electors to vote for Bush as the court-ordered recount dragged on. The SCOTUS decision rendered that preparation moot. Also, in 1876, states sent competing electoral college delegations and after Congress failed for months to agree on which was valid, a last-minute deal was struck that made Rutherford B. Hayes president as long as he agreed to end Reconstruction.)
And from TheConversation.com:


welovetrump--2020-12-17--HACK ATTACK:  Dr. Fauci Tells Parents Not To See Their Kids On Christmas

To call this guy a “ hack ” would be too generous .
I knew it was a lie at the time you said it , but America went along with you .
Welcome to day 280 of two weeks to flatten the curve .
Then it was the virus spreads on surfaces .
Then it can only go one way down the aisles at the grocery store .
Then it was it can ’ t get you if you ’ re seated at a restaurant , but it will if you ’ re not wearing a mask while you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the virus gets really dangerous in bars after 10:00pm but before that no big deal .
It ’ s VERY dangerous for Americans to see their children during Christmas .
People have not been taking the advice too well .
Fox News had more details on the Fauci faux paux : Dr. Anthony Fauci , the nation ’ s top infectious disease expert , said this week that he and his wife will not be seeing his three adult children for Christmas or for his birthday on Christmas Eve amid the ongoing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to do the same .
Fauci made the comments during an interview with the Washington Post ’ s Power Up newsletter .
He said it would mark the first Christmas not spent with his three daughters since they were born .
“ I ’ m going to be with my wife – period , ” Fauci told the outlet on Monday .
“ The Christmas holiday is a special holiday for us because Christmas Eve is my birthday , ” said Fauci , who is turning 80 .
“ And Christmas Day is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to come home … That ’ s painful .
We don ’ t like that .
But that ’ s just one of the things you ’ re going to have to accept as we go through this unprecedented challenging time.
” Fauci , noting that many Americans ignored health guidelines over Thanksgiving , warned that Christmas can not be “ business as usual.
” “ Stay at home as much as you can , keep your interactions to the extent possible to members of the same household , ” Fauci said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as usual this Christmas because we ’ re already in a very difficult situation , and we ’ re going to make it worse , if we don ’ t do something about it.
” Fauci urged resilience , qualifying that the pandemic is “ an unusual situation ” and is “ not going to last forever.
” “ It is highly likely that with vaccines being distributed , that we will be back to normal by next Christmas , ” Fauci said .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
3,504 views
To call this guy a “hack” would be too generous.
More like a medical tyrant.
Hey Fauch, remember “two weeks to flatten the curve”?
I do.
I knew it was a lie at the time you said it, but America went along with you.
Welcome to day 280 of two weeks to flatten the curve.
Then it was the virus spreads on surfaces.
Then not surfaces.
Then it can only go one way down the aisles at the grocery store.
Then it was it can’t get you if you’re seated at a restaurant, but it will if you’re not wearing a mask while you walk to your table!
Then it was the virus gets really dangerous in bars after 10:00pm but before that no big deal.
The latest lie?
It’s VERY dangerous for Americans to see their children during Christmas.
What a piece of work!
Take a look:
https://twitter.com/GusMccrayTXRNGR/status/1339376902176436226
https://twitter.com/RonWatterson2/status/1339374115933872132
People have not been taking the advice too well.
One man wrote poetry:
'Twas the night before Christmas, and in Fauci's house / He'll celebrate 80, holed up with his spouse / The children send greetings by FaceTime and Zoom / To spare their aged parents a virulent doom https://t.co/Q0foWszbjR — Fark (@fark) December 8, 2020
Others resorted to profanity:
Oh, %#&$ no. “But that’s just one of the things you’re going to have to accept as we go through this unprecedented challenging time." https://t.co/x6pXwJUvow — VM Swiderski (@VMSwiderski) December 17, 2020
This guy is a fucking dirt bag. Fauci tells Americans not to see their kids for Christmashttps://t.co/QLrF3WsnmL — Mike (@fuctmind) December 17, 2020
Fauci tells Americans not to see their kids for Christmashttps://t.co/Vjma6sXWoo
Fuck this asshole — Deplorable Jim (@JamesElliott) December 17, 2020
Fox News had more details on the Fauci faux paux: