welovetrump--2020-09-19--Video: Newt Gingrich is Cut Off By Fox News Anchors While Exposing George Soros

Okay , you ’ re really going to want to watch this one .
Newt Gingrich was recently interviewed by Fox News anchors Harris Faulkner and Melissa Francis but things turned awkward real quick .
Gingrich started stating facts that George Soros ( Billionaire philanthropist ) was funding the recent riots and has used his money to get Progressive district attorneys that are anti-police , pro-criminal , in power .
Fox News Anchor Mellisa Francis spoke up and said “ I ’ m not sure we need to bring George Soros into this , ” Gingrich went on to say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for it .
I mean , why can ’ t we discuss the fact that millions of dollars… ” Then he was cut off by both Fox News anchors .
Check out the video your self and decide whether these anchors are protecting Soros or not .
Glenn Beck weighed in and had this to say about the situation : The Hill reported the story and added this to the story : On Wednesday , Gingrich argued that money provided by the billionaire progressive activist Soros was helping to fuel riots in multiple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis .
“ Progressive district attorneys are anti-police , pro-criminal , and overwhelmingly elected with George Soros ’ s money .
And they ’ re a major cause of the violence we ’ re seeing because they keep putting the violent criminals back on the street , ” Gingrich said Wednesday .
“ I ’ m not sure we need to bring George Soros into this , ” said co-host Melissa Francis .
“ I was going to say you get the last word , Speaker , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for it .
I mean , why can ’ t we discuss the fact that millions of dollars… ” Gingrich said before co-host Marie Harf injected .
“ No , he didn ’ t .
I agree with Melissa .
George Soros doesn ’ t need to be a part of this conversation , ” Harf said .
The crazy part about it is Fox News even wrote a story about how George Sors was funding different District Attorneys Soros , through the Justice & Public Safety PAC and other groups , has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ races in recent years , with a number of beneficiaries making headlines since their elections .
St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner , who was boosted by Soros in her campaign , drew controversy when she announced her office was bringing felony charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey , the couple who brandished guns outside their home as protesters marched by in June .
NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Support President Trump ?
Newt Gingrich was silenced for speaking the truth .
It isn ’ t a conspiracy that George Soros it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ facts !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
7,701 views
Okay, you’re really going to want to watch this one.
Newt Gingrich was recently interviewed by Fox News anchors Harris Faulkner and Melissa Francis but things turned awkward real quick.
Gingrich started stating facts that George Soros(Billionaire philanthropist) was funding the recent riots and has used his money to get Progressive district attorneys that are anti-police, pro-criminal, in power.
Fox News Anchor Mellisa Francis spoke up and said “I’m not sure we need to bring George Soros into this,”
Gingrich went on to say “He(George Soros) paid for it. I mean, why can’t we discuss the fact that millions of dollars…”
Then he was cut off by both Fox News anchors.
Check out the video your self and decide whether these anchors are protecting Soros or not.
This is one of the weirdest exchanges I’ve ever seen on TV. @newtgingrich correctly points out that George Soros threw an unprecedented amount of money into DA races all over the country to elect radicals and Fox News basically told him to shut up. WTF? pic.twitter.com/IxwcLG2gOH — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) September 16, 2020
Glenn Beck weighed in and had this to say about the situation:
What Newt Gingrich said yesterday on Fox News about George Soros' influence on many district attorneys is TRUE, documented, and must be reported. I WILL NOT play this game with Soros. pic.twitter.com/5TWY7BC6Xx — Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) September 17, 2020
Newt Gingrich proved George Soros is the enemy of state. — Omar Navarro (@RealOmarNavarro) September 17, 2020
Why are some in the left so afraid of our mentioning George Soros’ name that they scream anti-semitic? It IS his name. He IS funding pro-criminal,anti police district attorneys. Why is the left afraid of the facts? — Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) September 9, 2020
The Hill reported the story and added this to the story:
On Wednesday, Gingrich argued that money provided by the billionaire progressive activist Soros was helping to fuel riots in multiple U.S. cities throughout the summer following the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. “Progressive district attorneys are anti-police, pro-criminal, and overwhelmingly elected with George Soros’s money. And they’re a major cause of the violence we’re seeing because they keep putting the violent criminals back on the street,” Gingrich said Wednesday. “I’m not sure we need to bring George Soros into this,” said co-host Melissa Francis. “I was going to say you get the last word, Speaker,” Faulker said. “He paid for it. I mean, why can’t we discuss the fact that millions of dollars…” Gingrich said before co-host Marie Harf injected. “No, he didn’t. I agree with Melissa. George Soros doesn’t need to be a part of this conversation,” Harf said. “OK. So it’s verboten,” Gingrich replied.
In one smaller DA race alone George Soros pumped in $800,000. He’s done this all over the country to elect extremists. This has been widely reported. I’ve always had a lot of respect for you @HARRISFAULKNER but why was Newt shut down for pointing this out?https://t.co/hQKJI3d43x — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) September 16, 2020
The crazy part about it is Fox News even wrote a story about how George Sors was funding different District Attorneys
Soros, through the Justice & Public Safety PAC and other groups, has been spending millions of dollars on prosecutorial races in recent years, with a number of beneficiaries making headlines since their elections. St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, who was boosted by Soros in her campaign, drew controversy when she announced her office was bringing felony charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who brandished guns outside their home as protesters marched by in June.
Democrats love to accuse Republicans of anti-Semitism if we discuss George Soros massive expenditures and influence. It’s ironic because they’re being anti-Semitic: Assuming criticism of a man’s spending who happens to be Jewish = criticism of Judaism. What a horrible assumption. — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) September 16, 2020
Newt Gingrich was silenced for speaking the truth.
It isn’t a conspiracy that George Soros it’s funding radical leftists is straight facts!


welovetrump--2020-09-19--FLASHBACK: Trump Prophet Mark Taylor Says “Donald Won’t Be The Only Trump To Be President”

I absolutely love it when there ’ s a new Mark Taylor interview out , and one just landed !
For those of you may not have seen it yet , you HAVE TO check this out .
This interview is about an hour long and covers so many topics it ’ s hard to list them all here .
But trust me , it ’ s well worth your time .
For those of you who don ’ t know him , Taylor is the famous Firefighter-turned-Prophet who prophesied that Donald Trump would become President before it happened .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that incredible , you have to know this part : he said it back in 2011 .
You also have to keep in mind that while hindsight is always 20/20 , President Trump was NEVER favored to win .
From his initial announcement , he was always labeled as the underdog against the field of 17 Republican challengers , until he eventually knocked them all out !
Only when he was the last one standing did he reluctantly get the RNC ’ s support .
You do remember that , right ?
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ morning , there were polls being posted on major news networks saying Hillary Clinton had a 70 % or even 90 % chance of winning !
You remember all of those , right ?
So for Taylor to have prophesied this and been right is amazing .
To have done it four years before Trump even announced he was running is even more incredible .
So people tend to take note and listen when he speaks .
Here are just a few of the things he covers in this interview with Greg Hunter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says at least 3 more Supreme Court justices will be replaced by Donald Trump • He thinks a key in the whole thing will be Chief Justice Roberts , and that a lot more will play out there soon , including FISA court abuses • He says Donald Trump WILL NOT be removed from office • He says Donald Trump will sail into re-election in 2020 because the LORD ’ s righteous right hand is upon him • He says Donald Trump was put into office by God • He said the LORD @ @ @ @ @ @ @ odds seem impossible , and wipe out the U.S. debt , leading to prosperity beyon anything we ’ ve seen before Those are just a few highlights , there is a lot more that I can ’ t even list .
But here ’ s one more biggie… .
And I ’ m a little dismayed that Hunter didn ’ t immediately follow up with a question , it was a huge interview blunder by him .
Near the end of the interview , Taylor abruptly changes course and says , “ Would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here today on this interview ?
Ok…..Donald Trump will not be the only Trump to occupy the Presidency.
” Of course the immediate follow up questions from Hunter should have been , did I hear you right ?
Did you really just say that ?
And then most important : WHO ?
Which other Trump ?
Melania is not qualified because she ’ s not a natural born citizen , so it ’ s not her .
Plus as wonderful as she is as FLOTUS , this isn ’ t the job for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ivanka .
That ’ s my guess .
And how incredible would it be for the Dems to have to deal with the First Woman President being a Republican ?
It would be perfectly poetic .
Kind of like how God likes to work , isn ’ t it ?
It reminds me of Psalm 37 : 12 The wicked plots against the righteous And gnashes at him with his teeth .
13 The Lord laughs at him , For He sees his day is coming .
14 The wicked have drawn the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down the afflicted and the needy , To slay those who are upright in conduct .
15 Their sword will enter their own heart , And their bows will be broken .
But if not Ivanka , then that leaves us with Eric , Don Jr. or…..Barron .
I don ’ t see Eric or Don Jr. having the gravitas for the position .
Love them both , but I don ’ t see it .
Barron is a real candidate .
Growing up with a father who is President and seeing it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ himself on an intimate first-hand basis couldn ’ t hurt .
But we ’ d be 20 years from that happening .
Could be .
Perhaps Ivanka and then Barron later on .
Anyway , enough of my speculation , let ’ s get to the interview itself .
I ’ ve copied the full video below for you .
NATIONAL POLL : Should President Trump Fire All Obama Holdovers ?
YES or NO I recommend you listen to the whole thing , but if you want to jump to the part about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the 40 minute mark and go from there .

I absolutely love it when there’s a new Mark Taylor interview out, and one just landed!
For those of you may not have seen it yet, you HAVE TO check this out.
This interview is about an hour long and covers so many topics it’s hard to list them all here.
But trust me, it’s well worth your time.
For those of you who don’t know him, Taylor is the famous Firefighter-turned-Prophet who prophesied that Donald Trump would become President before it happened.
If that doesn’t sound all that incredible, you have to know this part: he said it back in 2011.
You also have to keep in mind that while hindsight is always 20/20, President Trump was NEVER favored to win. From his initial announcement, he was always labeled as the underdog against the field of 17 Republican challengers, until he eventually knocked them all out! Only when he was the last one standing did he reluctantly get the RNC’s support.
You do remember that, right?
And also remember that even on election day morning, there were polls being posted on major news networks saying Hillary Clinton had a 70% or even 90% chance of winning!
You remember all of those, right?
So for Taylor to have prophesied this and been right is amazing. To have done it four years before Trump even announced he was running is even more incredible.
So people tend to take note and listen when he speaks.
Here are just a few of the things he covers in this interview with Greg Hunter, the USA Watchdog:
Taylor says at least 3 more Supreme Court justices will be replaced by Donald Trump
He thinks a key in the whole thing will be Chief Justice Roberts, and that a lot more will play out there soon, including FISA court abuses
He says Donald Trump WILL NOT be removed from office
He says Donald Trump will sail into re-election in 2020 because the LORD’s righteous right hand is upon him
He says Donald Trump was put into office by God
He said the LORD will perform a miracle, when the odds seem impossible, and wipe out the U.S. debt, leading to prosperity beyon anything we’ve seen before
Those are just a few highlights, there is a lot more that I can’t even list.
But here’s one more biggie….
Really big.
And I’m a little dismayed that Hunter didn’t immediately follow up with a question, it was a huge interview blunder by him.
Near the end of the interview, Taylor abruptly changes course and says, “Would you like me to break some news here today on this interview? Ok…..Donald Trump will not be the only Trump to occupy the Presidency.”
WHAT!
Of course the immediate follow up questions from Hunter should have been, did I hear you right? Did you really just say that?
And then most important: WHO? Which other Trump?
Here’s my speculation….
Melania is not qualified because she’s not a natural born citizen, so it’s not her. Plus as wonderful as she is as FLOTUS, this isn’t the job for her.
The most obvious choice is Ivanka. That’s my guess. And how incredible would it be for the Dems to have to deal with the First Woman President being a Republican? It would be perfectly poetic. Kind of like how God likes to work, isn’t it?
It reminds me of Psalm 37:
12 The wicked plots against the righteous
And gnashes at him with his teeth.
13 The Lord laughs at him,
For He sees his day is coming.
14 The wicked have drawn the sword and bent their bow
To cast down the afflicted and the needy,
To slay those who are upright in conduct.
15 Their sword will enter their own heart,
And their bows will be broken.
But if not Ivanka, then that leaves us with Eric, Don Jr. or…..Barron.
I don’t see Eric or Don Jr. having the gravitas for the position. Love them both, but I don’t see it.
Barron is a real candidate. Growing up with a father who is President and seeing it all firsthand, and learning from Donald himself on an intimate first-hand basis couldn’t hurt. But we’d be 20 years from that happening. Could be. Perhaps Ivanka and then Barron later on.
Anyway, enough of my speculation, let’s get to the interview itself.
I’ve copied the full video below for you.
I recommend you listen to the whole thing, but if you want to jump to the part about another Trump becoming president, start at about the 40 minute mark and go from there.
Enjoy:


welovetrump--2020-09-19--Obama’s Message To The Senate When Filling Scalia’s Seat In 2016:  “Do Your Job”

Oh this smug face , I can barely stand it !
2020 Obama sure sounds a lot different than 2016 @ @ @ @ @ ?
Trending : After Ginsburg Death , Chuck Schumer Pleads : ” This vacancy should @ @ @ @ @ have a new president.
” Scalia had died and Obama was a lame duck President @ @ @ @ @ his appointee to replace Scalia before the election .
And in doing so he lectured @ @ @ @ @ DoYourJob '' .
Bet he wishes he never said that right about now !

Oh this smug face, I can barely stand it!
2020 Obama sure sounds a lot different than 2016 Obama, doesn't he?
Anyone remember 2016?
Scalia had died and Obama was a lame duck President.
He attempted to ramrod his appointee to replace Scalia before the election.
And in doing so he lectured the Senate to "#DoYourJob".
Bet he wishes he never said that right about now!
Take a look:


welovetrump--2020-09-19--President Trump Reacts To News of Ginsburg’s Death: “She Just Died?  Wow….”

I think this is an incredible moment .
Our President was on stage at a campaign rally when news of @ @ @ @ @ He had no idea until he stepped off stage and was told by a reporter @ @ @ @ @ the moment responding to the news .
Absolutely amazing to watch , you can see @ @ @ @ @ real time , probably a million things running through his mind .
He knows this @ @ @ @ @ the Supreme Court and he knows this news just….changed…..everything .
Watch him process and watch @ @ @ @ @ President :

I think this is an incredible moment.
Our President was on stage at a campaign rally when news of Ginsburg's death broke.
He had no idea until he stepped off stage and was told by a reporter.
Here he is in the moment responding to the news.
Absolutely amazing to watch, you can see him processing the news in real time, probably a million things running through his mind.
He knows this election is probably headed to the Supreme Court and he knows this news just….changed…..everything.
Watch him process and watch the kind reaction from our President:


welovetrump--2020-09-19--REMEMBER:  “Firefighter Prophet” Said Trump Will Get 5 or Maybe 6 Supreme Court Appointments!

Here is the full prophecy he posted in 2016 to his website : The Spirit of God says , `` Why do I sense fear in my people about the future ofAmerica ?
Have I not said that , ' l have heard your cries and will heal your land ? '
Standfirm !
Do not falter , put on the full armor of God !
Rake the enemy over the coals , for theend time battle is on for my 1 billion souls ! ''
The Spirit of God says , `` Do not fear that my servant Justice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crying out , why have I forsaken .
For I will show myself strong to prove that theso called wise are wrong .
For some will say that this is a miracle , for I am just gettingstarted , this is not even close to the pinnacle , for what I am going to do with MyAmerica .
For do not my people have eyes to see and ears to hear the two signs I gave , when they carried my servant 's body up the steps of the courthouse where to rest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Read the signs that were for allto see , and understand thewords in this prophecy . ''
The Spirit of God says , `` 5 , that 's right , 5 Supreme Court Justices will be appointed bymy new president , my anointed .
I will choose 5 through my anointed to keep thosealive .
I will stack the court with those that I choose , to send a clear message to theenemy , that you lose !
This is the miracle that I will perform , so that MY COURT will bereformed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , `` The cries , the cries that I have heard from the womb , havereached my eyes and ears like a sonic boom !
The five I appoint and the reform thatshall take place , the great I AM shall take on this case !
For it is my will and my way forall those that have prayed , that MY COURT SHALL OVERTURN ROE VS WADE !
The Spirit of God says , `` America , get ready , for I AM choosing from the top of thecream , for I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , from the president and hisadministration , to judges and congress to ease Americas frustrations ! ''
The Spirit of God says , `` Rise up my Army and get in the fight , for this is the generationthat 's taking flight .
This is the generation of warriors that those of old wanted to see , and the enemy will have no choice but to flee .
Rise up !
Stomp the enemies head withbliss ; send the enemy back to Hell and into the abyss .
This is the generation of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face and see , but I AM and all of Heaven is cheering you onwith glee !
`` Your Supreme Commander , GOD

Here is the full prophecy he posted in 2016 to his website:
2-24-16
Do not fear America
The Spirit of God says, "Why do I sense fear in my people about the future ofAmerica? Have I not said that, 'l have heard your cries and will heal your land?'
Standfirm! Do not falter, put on the full armor of God! Rake the enemy over the coals, for theend time battle is on for my 1 billion souls!"
The Spirit of God says, "Do not fear that my servant Justice Scalia has been taken, forsome are crying out, why have I forsaken. For I will show myself strong to prove that theso called wise are wrong.
For some will say that this is a miracle, for I am just gettingstarted, this is not even close to the pinnacle, for what I am going to do with MyAmerica. For do not my people have eyes to see and ears to hear the two signs I gave,when they carried my servant's body up the steps of the courthouse where to rest hewas laid? Read the signs! Read the signs that were for allto see, and understand thewords in this prophecy."
The Spirit of God says, "5, that's right, 5 Supreme Court Justices will be appointed bymy new president, my anointed. I will choose 5 through my anointed to keep thosealive. I will stack the court with those that I choose, to send a clear message to theenemy, that you lose! This is the miracle that I will perform, so that MY COURT will bereformed."
The Spirit of God says, "The cries, the cries that I have heard from the womb, havereached my eyes and ears like a sonic boom! The five I appoint and the reform thatshall take place, the great I AM shall take on this case! For it is my will and my way forall those that have prayed, that MY COURT SHALL OVERTURN ROE VS WADE!
The Spirit of God says, "America, get ready, for I AM choosing from the top of thecream, for I AM putting together America's dream team, from the president and hisadministration, to judges and congress to ease Americas frustrations!"
The Spirit of God says, "Rise up my Army and get in the fight, for this is the generationthat's taking flight. This is the generation of warriors that those of old wanted to see,and the enemy will have no choice but to flee. Rise up! Stomp the enemies head withbliss; send the enemy back to Hell and into the abyss.
This is the generation of warriorsthat all of Hell has feared to face and see, but I AM and all of Heaven is cheering you onwith glee!"Your Supreme Commander, GOD


welovetrump--2020-09-19--Trump Declares Another $14B In Aid To Farmers Affected By Covid-19

Without our farmers what would we do ?
Trump understands how important farmers our to America so that ’ s why the Trump administration decided to give 14 billion dollars to help assist farmers affected by Covid-19 .
This will be the second round of financial aid to farmers in April the financial aid was given to farmers too .
The New York Times had this to report about the financial aid that will be given to farmers : The Trump administration is expected to announce on Thursday that it will provide $ 14 billion in additional aid to American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economically from the coronavirus , according to a person familiar with the plans .
President Trump is expected to mention the aid during a campaign event in Wisconsin on Thursday evening .
The details of how the latest tranche of money will be deployed are expected to be announced Friday morning .
This would be the second round of aid that the Trump administration delivered to farmers out of the money and borrowing authority that was approved to support the agriculture sector in the economic relief legislation passed by Congress in March .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a $ 19 billion aid package to help farmers cope with supply chain disruptions and lost business from hotels and restaurants as a result of stay-at-home orders .
The Des Moines Register wasn ’ t kept silent and had these details to add : The federal government will send up to $ 14 billion in aid to U.S. farmers and ranchers struggling with falling prices , lost markets and other supply chain disruptions tied to the global pandemic , the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced Friday .
“ America ’ s agriculture communities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic , ” U.S. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said in a statement released Friday morning .
This is the second round of coronavirus assistance President Donald Trump ’ s administration will send to U.S. farmers .
Perdue announced the first $ 19 billion round in April as the coronavirus roiled the nation ’ s food supply chain .
“ The COVID-19 pandemic continues to create significant market and trade disruptions , and this poses very real challenges for Iowa farmers , ” said Iowa Agriculture Secretary Mike Naig @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but it will take time.
” Time after time Trump has shown that he legitimately cares about farmers in America and this is just another example .
I ’ m sure we all know who the farmers are voting for this November !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
307 views
Without our farmers what would we do?
Trump understands how important farmers our to America so that’s why the Trump administration decided to give 14 billion dollars to help assist farmers affected by Covid-19.
This will be the second round of financial aid to farmers in April the financial aid was given to farmers too.
Trump announces another $14 billion in aid to farmers affected by COVID-19: report https://t.co/kd6pk5OhNi pic.twitter.com/UaE8sYsdo0 — The Hill (@thehill) September 18, 2020
The Trump administration will begin paying farmers and ranchers a new round of coronavirus aid starting on
Monday https://t.co/NHJbXPZQrt — POLITICO (@politico) September 18, 2020
Trump promises $14 billion in pandemic aid to farmers ahead of US elections https://t.co/Yh3wIJ6wCz — Republic (@republic) September 19, 2020
The New York Times had this to report about the financial aid that will be given to farmers:
The Trump administration is expected to announce on Thursday that it will provide $14 billion in additional aid to American farmers, many of whom are suffering economically from the coronavirus, according to a person familiar with the plans. President Trump is expected to mention the aid during a campaign event in Wisconsin on Thursday evening. The details of how the latest tranche of money will be deployed are expected to be announced Friday morning. This would be the second round of aid that the Trump administration delivered to farmers out of the money and borrowing authority that was approved to support the agriculture sector in the economic relief legislation passed by Congress in March. In April, the Agriculture Department announced a $19 billion aid package to help farmers cope with supply chain disruptions and lost business from hotels and restaurants as a result of stay-at-home orders.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1306951764382490626
The Des Moines Register wasn’t kept silent and had these details to add:
NATIONAL POLL: Do You Trust Fox News? The federal government will send up to $14 billion in aid to U.S. farmers and ranchers struggling with falling prices, lost markets and other supply chain disruptions tied to the global pandemic, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced Friday. “America’s agriculture communities are resilient, but still face many challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic,” U.S. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said in a statement released Friday morning. This is the second round of coronavirus assistance President Donald Trump’s administration will send to U.S. farmers. Perdue announced the first $19 billion round in April as the coronavirus roiled the nation’s food supply chain. “The COVID-19 pandemic continues to create significant market and trade disruptions, and this poses very real challenges for Iowa farmers,” said Iowa Agriculture Secretary Mike Naig. “The agriculture economy will rebound, but it will take time.”
Time after time Trump has shown that he legitimately cares about farmers in America and this is just another example.
I’m sure we all know who the farmers are voting for this November!


welovetrump--2020-09-20--Reporters Call Out Biden in Minnesota and Say “What’s the Point Of Coming Here”

The local media in Minnesota took shots at presidential candidate Joe Biden recently .
Biden ’ s campaign disclosed information to the local media about the time and location of Biden ’ s arrival .
They also didn ’ t allow media inside the hall where Biden was giving his speech .
It seems like Biden ’ s handlers are protecting him from tough questions and only allowing him to answer questions that have been pre-determined .
A local Minnesota reporter lashed out against Biden in a series of tweets , check it out below : After finishing the speech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ask questions .
The reason being is because Biden just felt like wandering away .
Check out the video below and see for yourself .
Biden is just a pawn the far-left is using to complete their agenda .
He has read from teleprompters the last couple weeks and now he refuses the press to ask real questions .
It seems like everything is pre-planned when Biden hits the campaign trail .
Compared to Trump who answers questions from almost everybody .
Alpha News Minnesota covered the story and reported this : Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while President Donald Trump held a rally in Bemidji later in the evening .
Unlike Trump ’ s rally , Biden ’ s visit strictly limited media access .
The event was so controlled that The Star Tribune referred to it as “ Biden ’ s carefully choreographed small group encounter.
” A slew of mostly left-leaning Minnesota journalists from other outlets bemoaned the fact that the campaign denied them access and appeared to withhold details about the event for much longer than usual .
WCCO anchor Esme Murphy noted how the campaign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its press policy was “ really unusual , ” and compared it to Trump ’ s campaign which was forthcoming with reporters .
READER SURVEY : Should President Trump Make English The Official Language of the United States ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
11,812 views
The local media in Minnesota took shots at presidential candidate Joe Biden recently.
Biden’s campaign failed to disclose information to the local media about the time and location of Biden’s arrival.
They also didn’t allow media inside the hall where Biden was giving his speech.
So what’s the point?
Might as well broadcast it from his basement, right?
It seems like Biden’s handlers are protecting him from tough questions and only allowing him to answer questions that have been pre-determined.
A local Minnesota reporter lashed out against Biden in a series of tweets, check it out below:
The @JoeBiden camp still hasn’t released info to all media as far as exact time and location. We had to get it from NBC. Also, it’s pool only. No media inside the hall. They also yanked the only one-on-one interview. Begs the question: what’s the point of coming here at all?? 🤷🏻♂ — Dan Wolfe (@DanWolfeKBJR) September 18, 2020
A day after Joe Biden stiff-armed local media in Minnesota, his campaign declared there would be no activity at all today at 8:34 a.m. On a Saturday, 44 days from Election Day. pic.twitter.com/R0P6sIdF7F — Tim Murtaugh (@TimMurtaugh) September 19, 2020
Joe Biden’s handlers are playing “hide the candidate” from the local media in Minnesota. Local TV anchor/producer wonders “what’s the point of coming here at all?” pic.twitter.com/s7aeS6LWg6 — Tim Murtaugh (@TimMurtaugh) September 18, 2020
Joe Biden’s handlers are playing “hide the candidate” from the local media in Minnesota. Local TV anchor/producer wonders “what’s the point of coming here at all?” pic.twitter.com/s7aeS6LWg6 — Tim Murtaugh (@TimMurtaugh) September 18, 2020
After finishing the speech the Press weren’t allowed to ask questions.
The reason being is because Biden just felt like wandering away.
Check out the video below and see for yourself.
Biden is just a pawn the far-left is using to complete their agenda.
He has read from teleprompters the last couple weeks and now he refuses the press to ask real questions.
It seems like everything is pre-planned when Biden hits the campaign trail.
Compared to Trump who answers questions from almost everybody.
Alpha News Minnesota covered the story and reported this:
Biden visited union members in Duluth Friday afternoon while President Donald Trump held a rally in Bemidji later in the evening. Unlike Trump’s rally, Biden’s visit strictly limited media access. The event was so controlled that The Star Tribune referred to it as “Biden’s carefully choreographed small group encounter.” A slew of mostly left-leaning Minnesota journalists from other outlets bemoaned the fact that the campaign denied them access and appeared to withhold details about the event for much longer than usual. WCCO anchor Esme Murphy noted how the campaign’s hesitation to provide details about its press policy was “really unusual,” and compared it to Trump’s campaign which was forthcoming with reporters.


welovetrump--2020-09-20--Hollywood Star Samaire Armstrong Publicly Supports Trump

Hopefully , she won ’ t be blackballed by Hollywood Elites for sticking up for Trump .
“ The O.C.
” actress Samaire Armstrong posted a fiery video on Wednesday showing her support for President Trump .
She not only supported Trump in the video but she denounced the far-left too !
She ’ s completely going against the narrative in Hollywood that if you support Trump you ’ re racist and a bigot .
Fox News covered the story and contributed these details : “ The O.C.
” actress Samaire Armstrong posted a passionate video on Wednesday pledging her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presidential election .
Armstrong , 39 , also criticized the “ far-left mob ” for silencing Americans who hold conservative beliefs .
“ I ’ m voting # Trump2020 , and this is why , ” the actress captioned a lengthy video on Instagram .
“ This is MY opinion .
I am sharing it with you at the cost of everything , because it is my right .
It is your right to refute it .
What I hope comes from this , is that we are able to have an open @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are so many in our great country who have been bullied into silence at the doing of a far-left mob.
” The “ Stay Alive ” actress encouraged her followers to “ stop placating to the emotionally undeveloped , who have an inability to process the meaning of personal responsibility , as if they are the cultural guide of which we should follow.
” “ Freedom of speech must be restored .
Logic must be restored .
Critical thinking must be restored , ” she added in her caption .
She not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out BLM earlier in the week .
She is quoted saying “ Black lives , they matter !
!
However , BLM is a billion-dollar domestic terrorist organization.
” NATIONAL POLL : Are You Happy Melania Replaced Michelle As First Lady ?
The Daily Mail wasn ’ t silent and this to the story : Samaire Armstrong took to Instagram on Wednesday to pledge her support for Donald Trump in upcoming presidential election after expressing her ire for Black Lives Matter .
In a post earlier this week referring to the shooting of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Armstrong said that Black Lives Matter ‘ has taken us by our heart , has manipulated our mind and contorted our values .
She added : ‘ This is a act of warfare at the hands of Marxist criminals , “ woke ” white , angsty uneducated # ANTIFA , who do not have the bandwidth to navigate an indoor golf course , let alone life .
They are not bright .
They are manipulative criminals .
They are puppets , of an agenda .
We too have been puppets .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ White guilt , celebrity endorsement , and corporate pandering has funded this $ 1 billion domestic terrorist organization.
’ I guess time will tell if this will affect her career negatively .
But it ’ s much better to speak the truth than be controlled by Hollywood Elites .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
5,825 views
Welcome aboard the Trump train Samaire Armstrong.
Hopefully, she won’t be blackballed by Hollywood Elites for sticking up for Trump.
“The O.C.” actress Samaire Armstrong posted a fiery video on Wednesday showing her support for President Trump.
She not only supported Trump in the video but she denounced the far-left too!
Here’s the video below.
#SamaireArmstrong is known for her roles in #TheOC, #PartyOfFive and #Entourage, but she's rebranding as a #DonaldTrump cheerleader. Watch her explain why she's voting for him. This quote is juicy: "Taxing the rich gets in the way of providing jobs for people." Thoughts? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/AXEe0yFE7r — Perez (@ThePerezHilton) September 17, 2020
She’s completely going against the narrative in Hollywood that if you support Trump you’re racist and a bigot.
Fox guest Samaire Armstrong: "The fact that [Donald Trump] has filed bankruptcy, to me, speaks to his testament to the American values that we hold, that we should hold" pic.twitter.com/XQG5wGBccO — Jason Campbell (@JasonSCampbell) September 19, 2020
‘O.C.’ Actress Samaire Armstrong Backs Trump in Fiery Video: ‘Far-Left Mob’ Has Silenced Americans
https://t.co/a91qtPMeso‘o.c.’-actress-samaire-armstrong-backs-trump-in-fiery-video-‘far-left-mob’-has-silenced-americans/ — RedState (@RedState) September 19, 2020
Fox News covered the story and contributed these details:
“The O.C.” actress Samaire Armstrong posted a passionate video on Wednesday pledging her support for Donald Trump for the 2020 presidential election. Armstrong, 39, also criticized the “far-left mob” for silencing Americans who hold conservative beliefs. “I’m voting #Trump2020, and this is why,” the actress captioned a lengthy video on Instagram. “This is MY opinion. I am sharing it with you at the cost of everything, because it is my right. It is your right to refute it. What I hope comes from this, is that we are able to have an open dialogue.” Armstrong continued: “There are so many in our great country who have been bullied into silence at the doing of a far-left mob.” The “Stay Alive” actress encouraged her followers to “stop placating to the emotionally undeveloped, who have an inability to process the meaning of personal responsibility, as if they are the cultural guide of which we should follow.” “Freedom of speech must be restored. Logic must be restored. Critical thinking must be restored,” she added in her caption.
Not saying the 🔴 needs OUTSPOKEN support from #HollywoodElite but good to see a couple are not going with the same ol’ song and dance of the majority 🔵 side of Hollywood as well as not fearing to speak their voice now. 👍🏾 @samaire_samaire 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/eHmAza2UM3 — Jon Folse (@Jon_Folse) September 19, 2020
She not only showed her support for Trump but called out BLM earlier in the week.
She is quoted saying “Black lives, they matter!! However, BLM is a billion-dollar domestic terrorist organization.”
#TheOC star Samaire Armstong explains why she's voting for Trump and calls #BLM a "terrorist organization" https://t.co/7NDTJMRsWY — JustJared.com (@JustJared) September 17, 2020
The O.C.'s Samaire Armstrong blasts BLM calling it a 'terror organization funded by white guilt' https://t.co/E7MU8FwGEd — Daily Mail Celebrity (@DailyMailCeleb) September 18, 2020
The Daily Mail wasn’t silent and this to the story:
PRAYER CHAIN FOR TRUMP: Please add your name and a prayer to support our President! Samaire Armstrong took to Instagram on Wednesday to pledge her support for Donald Trump in upcoming presidential election after expressing her ire for Black Lives Matter. In a post earlier this week referring to the shooting of two Los Angeles Sheriff’s deputies, Armstrong said that Black Lives Matter ‘has taken us by our heart, has manipulated our mind and contorted our values. She added: ‘This is a act of warfare at the hands of Marxist criminals, “woke” white, angsty uneducated #ANTIFA, who do not have the bandwidth to navigate an indoor golf course, let alone life. They are not bright. They are manipulative criminals. They are puppets, of an agenda. We too have been puppets. This must end now.’ She added: ‘White guilt, celebrity endorsement, and corporate pandering has funded this $1 billion domestic terrorist organization.’
I guess time will tell if this will affect her career negatively.
But it’s much better to speak the truth than be controlled by Hollywood Elites.


welovetrump--2020-09-22--Twitter Users Question Bizarre Pelosi Moment:  “Did She Just Have a Stroke On TV?”

Let me make something very clear at the beginning of this article .
I do n't wish ill on anyone @ @ @ @ @ making fun of Pelosi .
I 'm truly asking…..WHAT THE HELL JUST HAPPENED ?
And @ @ @ @ @ after witnessing one of her more bizarre interviews , and that 's from a very @ @ @ @ @ look at what happens at the end of this clip , and keep in mind @ @ @ @ @ not altered in any way .

Let me make something very clear at the beginning of this article.
I don't wish ill on anyone.
And I'm not making fun of Pelosi.
I'm truly asking…..WHAT THE HELL JUST HAPPENED?
And so are many of you after witnessing one of her more bizarre interviews, and that's from a very high bar.
Take a look at what happens at the end of this clip, and keep in mind this is not edited and not altered in any way.
Watch:


welovetrump--2020-09-22--Trump Draws Another Massive Crowd In Ohio, Thousands In Line To Get In!

President Trump is once again outdoing himself on the campaign trail .
Meanwhile , Hiden Biden is still stuck in @ @ @ @ @ Check out the incredibly crowds that are turning out for Trump every single night !
@ @ @ @ @ and on for days !

President Trump is once again outdoing himself on the campaign trail.
Meanwhile, Hiden Biden is still stuck in his basement most days.
Check out the incredibly crowds that are turning out for Trump every single night!
Another line that goes on and on for days!


welovetrump--2020-09-21--FLASHBACK: RBG in 2016 said Senate should hold confirmation hearing during election year

The media and Democrats are going absolutely nuts at the idea of Trump filling RBG ’ s seat in the Supreme Court .
Many of them are issuing threats if Senate Republicans even attempt confirmation hearings .
And they ’ re also pointing to the alleged fact that Ginsburg ’ s dying wish was that she be replaced by the next president .
But what was Ginsburg ’ s opinion in 2016 when Scalia died and Obama tried to fill his seat ?
Why , she felt it was perfectly okay for Obama to fill a SCOTUS seat in an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the Fox News report on Ginsburg ’ s 2016 opinion : The death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg prompted key Washington figures to change their tune on whether a high-court vacancy should be filled so close to an election – and even the late jurist seems to have reversed herself on the issue .
Ginsburg , whose death was announced Friday , reportedly told her granddaughter Clara Spera , “ My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.
” That desire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joe Biden and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer , whose initial statements included both tributes to Ginsburg and warnings to President Trump that the next nominee could only be named by the winner of the November presidential election .
But in 2016 , when a lame-duck President Obama tabbed Merrick Garland to replace the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia , Democratic leaders had no problem with the move .
And neither did Ginsburg .
“ There ’ s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being the president in his last @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2016 New York Times interview in which she called for Garland to receive a confirmation vote in the Senate .
As for whether the Senate should take up a vote on Garland , Ginsburg said at the time , “ That ’ s their job.
” Who really knows if Ginsburg really had a dying wish to be replaced by the next president ?
But she was absolutely right in 2016 .
Trump is still the President until January 2021 at least and he has the constitutional right to fill the vacant SCOTUS @ @ @ @ @

The media and Democrats are going absolutely nuts at the idea of Trump filling RBG’s seat in the Supreme Court.
Many of them are issuing threats if Senate Republicans even attempt confirmation hearings.
And they’re also pointing to the alleged fact that Ginsburg’s dying wish was that she be replaced by the next president.
But what was Ginsburg’s opinion in 2016 when Scalia died and Obama tried to fill his seat?
Why, she felt it was perfectly okay for Obama to fill a SCOTUS seat in an election year!
Just take a look at the Fox News report on Ginsburg’s 2016 opinion:
The death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg prompted key Washington figures to change their tune on whether a high-court vacancy should be filled so close to an election – and even the late jurist seems to have reversed herself on the issue. Ginsburg, whose death was announced Friday, reportedly told her granddaughter Clara Spera, “My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.” That desire jibes with Democrats, including presidential nominee Joe Biden and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, whose initial statements included both tributes to Ginsburg and warnings to President Trump that the next nominee could only be named by the winner of the November presidential election. But in 2016, when a lame-duck President Obama tabbed Merrick Garland to replace the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, Democratic leaders had no problem with the move. And neither did Ginsburg. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being the president in his last year,” Ginsburg said in a 2016 New York Times interview in which she called for Garland to receive a confirmation vote in the Senate. As for whether the Senate should take up a vote on Garland, Ginsburg said at the time, “That’s their job.”
Who really knows if Ginsburg really had a dying wish to be replaced by the next president?
But she was absolutely right in 2016.
Trump is still the President until January 2021 at least and he has the constitutional right to fill the vacant SCOTUS seat left by Ginsburg.


welovetrump--2020-09-21--Huge “F–k Cuomo and de Blasio” painted on NYC street

New York must be absolutely fed up with these two .
They wrecked the city 's economy with their COVID shutdowns .
And they 've allowed BLM and ANTIFA protesters to essentially do whatever they want .
As the Daily Mail reports , some New Yorkers are calling on de Blasio to resign over his handling of re-opening the schools : The majority of the more than 1 million public school students in the city will be in the classroom one to three days a week and learning remotely the rest of the time .
The Mayor greeted pre-K students @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 'air of energy and spirit ' among teachers and pupils .
'To see those children so engaged , so happy to be there , it was truly inspiring , ' de Blasio said .
'This year was special ... because we 've had to overcome so much . '
He also tweeted : 'There 's nothing like the first day of school .
Welcome back to our 3-K , Pre-K and District 75 students starting in-person learning today !
'This school year will look different .
Make no mistake though , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safe environment , a strong learning curriculum and the continued spirit of community . '
His Twitter was immediately inundated with calls to resign from angry New Yorkers .
'First lesson of the school year : Resign , ' one tweeted .
Another said : 'Teachers and principals are going above and beyond .
You should be ashamed of yourself .
Just resign . '
After a fidgety spring of online pre-K , Jessica D'Amato 's 5-year-old son has been so excited about going back to in-person school that he keeps asking : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ' First the answer was September 10 before being pushed to Monday and then September 29 - much to the family 's frustration . '
I think that all the students are really , really at a disservice right now - because of the uncertainty , because of the lack of in-person instruction , ' D'Amato said .
She wondered why the city is still grappling with the staffing shortages cited for the latest delay after having months to plan , and how likely it is that the extra days will solve the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how they 're going to fix the issue in a week , and I 'll be very upset if then they push it again , ' she said , 'because this kid needs to be in school already . '

New York must be absolutely fed up with these two.
They wrecked the city's economy with their COVID shutdowns.
And they've allowed BLM and ANTIFA protesters to essentially do whatever they want.
As the Daily Mail reports, some New Yorkers are calling on de Blasio to resign over his handling of re-opening the schools:
The majority of the more than 1 million public school students in the city will be in the classroom one to three days a week and learning remotely the rest of the time.
The Mayor greeted pre-K students at a school in Queens and praised the 'air of energy and spirit' among teachers and pupils.
'To see those children so engaged, so happy to be there, it was truly inspiring,' de Blasio said. 'This year was special... because we've had to overcome so much.'
He also tweeted: 'There's nothing like the first day of school. Welcome back to our 3-K, Pre-K and District 75 students starting in-person learning today!
'This school year will look different. Make no mistake though, that our goals are the same. A safe environment, a strong learning curriculum and the continued spirit of community.'
His Twitter was immediately inundated with calls to resign from angry New Yorkers.
'First lesson of the school year: Resign,' one tweeted.
Another said: 'Teachers and principals are going above and beyond. You should be ashamed of yourself. Just resign.'
After a fidgety spring of online pre-K, Jessica D'Amato's 5-year-old son has been so excited about going back to in-person school that he keeps asking: 'When am I going to kindergarten?'
First the answer was September 10 before being pushed to Monday and then September 29 - much to the family's frustration.
'I think that all the students are really, really at a disservice right now - because of the uncertainty, because of the lack of in-person instruction,' D'Amato said.
She wondered why the city is still grappling with the staffing shortages cited for the latest delay after having months to plan, and how likely it is that the extra days will solve the problem.
'I can't see how they're going to fix the issue in a week, and I'll be very upset if then they push it again,' she said, 'because this kid needs to be in school already.'


welovetrump--2020-09-21--Does Joe Biden Agree He “Doesn’t Have a Chance” Before Being Rushed Away By Handlers?

It 's sad when you have to look to foreign media to cover the U.S. election fairly .
But that 's the state of our mainstream media today .
However , Aljazeera has made clear Biden is struggling among black voters : Racial inequality in the United States came into sharp focus this year , and became a defining topic of the national debate , after police killings of Black Americans ignited months of widespread protests and galvanised the nation to demand racial justice and police reforms .
The unrest has forced US President Donald Trump , a Republican who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law and order '' platform , and his main challenger , Democratic nominee Joe Biden , to wrestle with the complicated issue of race in America , and try to appeal to Black voters .
But with less than two months before the election , in the middle of a pandemic and record-high unemployment rates , whether Black Americans will be energised to come out in large numbers to vote remains uncertain - potentially defining the outcome of the 2020 election .
A recent poll shows Biden by far outperforming Trump among Black @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` Most Black voters are going to support Joe Biden , '' said Ravi Perry , professor and chair of the Department of Political Science at Howard University , a historically Black university .
`` But there are differences in enthusiasm , '' Perry tells Al Jazeera , `` where Black women , for instance , have far more enthusiasm towards Biden , and many young people , support him but with far less enthusiasm . ''
There is a segment of our community that thinks Kamala Harris ' record as district attorney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he said in reference to her years as a prosecutor when she embraced a `` top cop '' label .
`` But the overall feeling is definitely that is a step in the right direction , a sense that he recognises us . ''
While Biden is struggling with enthusiasm , the excitement for Trump has never been hotter !
Despite the pandemic , people are flocking just for the opportunity to see Trump in person !

It's sad when you have to look to foreign media to cover the U.S. election fairly.
But that's the state of our mainstream media today.
However, Aljazeera has made clear Biden is struggling among black voters:
Racial inequality in the United States came into sharp focus this year, and became a defining topic of the national debate, after police killings of Black Americans ignited months of widespread protests and galvanised the nation to demand racial justice and police reforms.
The unrest has forced US President Donald Trump, a Republican who is running for re-election on a "law and order" platform, and his main challenger, Democratic nominee Joe Biden, to wrestle with the complicated issue of race in America, and try to appeal to Black voters.
But with less than two months before the election, in the middle of a pandemic and record-high unemployment rates, whether Black Americans will be energised to come out in large numbers to vote remains uncertain - potentially defining the outcome of the 2020 election. A recent poll shows Biden by far outperforming Trump among Black voters, with 78 percent support.
"Most Black voters are going to support Joe Biden," said Ravi Perry, professor and chair of the Department of Political Science at Howard University, a historically Black university.
"But there are differences in enthusiasm," Perry tells Al Jazeera, "where Black women, for instance, have far more enthusiasm towards Biden, and many young people, support him but with far less enthusiasm." [...]" There is a segment of our community that thinks Kamala Harris' record as district attorney and attorney general is shaky," he said in reference to her years as a prosecutor when she embraced a "top cop" label. "But the overall feeling is definitely that is a step in the right direction, a sense that he recognises us."
While Biden is struggling with enthusiasm, the excitement for Trump has never been hotter!
Despite the pandemic, people are flocking just for the opportunity to see Trump in person!


welovetrump--2020-09-21--Trump Calls BS on Ginsburg’s Reported Dying Last Words: “That Sounds Like A Schumer Deal or Maybe Pe

Trump Calls BS on Ginsburg’s Reported Dying Last Words: “That Sounds Like A Schumer Deal or Maybe Pelosi”

Ruth Bader Ginsburg supposedly said that she wants the `` next president '' to pick her successor .
And one @ @ @ @ @ be President Trump .
During a phone interview with Fox and Friends , Trump appeared @ @ @ @ @ reports about RBG 's dying last words .
Look , I do n't know if @ @ @ @ @ was that written out by Schiff , Schumer and Pelosi ?
But that sounds like @ @ @ @ @ Pelosi , or maybe even Shifty Schiff .
Indeed , there is no recording of @ @ @ @ @ It was immediately reported by the media after news broke of RBG 's death .
@ @ @ @ @ the family has yet to publicly confirm the supposed statement .
See Trump 's appearance @ @ @ @ @ :

Ruth Bader Ginsburg supposedly said that she wants the "next president" to pick her successor.
Well…
A lot of people aren't buying it.
And one of those people appears to be President Trump.
During a phone interview with Fox and Friends, Trump appeared to call BS on the reports about RBG's dying last words.
Specifically, Trump said:
Look, I don't know if she said that. Or was that written out by Schiff, Schumer and Pelosi? […] But that sounds like a Schumer deal, or Pelosi, or maybe even Shifty Schiff.
Indeed, there is no recording of RBG's last words.
It was immediately reported by the media after news broke of RBG's death.
As of this writing, the family has yet to publicly confirm the supposed statement.
See Trump's appearance on Fox and Friends below:


welovetrump--2020-09-21--CDC “Mistakenly” Posts Then Deletes Article Saying COVID is Airborne and Can Travel Over 6 Feet, Mul

CDC “Mistakenly” Posts Then Deletes Article Saying COVID is Airborne and Can Travel Over 6 Feet, Multiple Reports Confirm

Democrats keep telling us to `` trust the science . ''
However , it appears that the scientists do n't even know what to publish !
First the CDC posts this article ... Then hours later , it retracts it !
And they wonder why the American public is wary to trust `` officials '' blindly !
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Monday abruptly reverted to its previous guidance about how coronavirus is transmitted , removing language about airborne transmission it had posted just days earlier .
`` A draft version of proposed changes to these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agency 's official website .
CDC is currently updating its recommendations regarding airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 ( the virus that causes COVID-19 ) .
Once this process has been completed , the update language will be posted , '' Jason McDonald , a CDC spokesman , said in a response emailed to CNN .
The guidance had been quietly updated on Friday , according to the CDC 's website .
CNN was first to report the change on Sunday .
The CDC responded to CNN just before noon on Monday to say it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Despite several studies that have shown the novel coronavirus can spread through small particles in the air , the CDC page now says that Covid-19 is thought to spread mainly between people in close contact -- about 6 feet -- and `` through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs , sneezes or talks . ''
This is the same language it posted months ago .
In language posted Friday and now removed , CDC said Covid-19 most commonly spread between people who are in close contact with one another , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to spread `` through respiratory droplets or small particles , such as those in aerosols , produced when an infected person coughs , sneezes , sings , talks or breathes . ''
These particles can cause infection when `` inhaled into the nose , mouth , airways , and lungs , '' the agency said .
`` This is thought to be the main way the virus spreads . ''
`` There is growing evidence that droplets and airborne particles can remain suspended in the air and be breathed in by others , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for example , during choir practice , in restaurants , or in fitness classes ) , '' the page said in the Friday update , which has since been removed .
`` In general , indoor environments without good ventilation increase this risk . ''
In the Friday update , the CDC had added new measures to protect yourself in others , including recommendations to use air purifiers to reduce airborne germs in indoors spaces and clear guidance to `` stay at least 6 feet away from others , whenever possible . ''
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ language around asymptomatic transmission , shifting from saying `` some people without symptoms may be able to spread the virus '' to saying `` people who are infected but do not show symptoms can spread the virus to others . ''
That language has now been removed .

Democrats keep telling us to "trust the science."
However, it appears that the scientists don't even know what to publish!
First the CDC posts this article...
Then hours later, it retracts it!
And they wonder why the American public is wary to trust "officials" blindly!
According to CNN:
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Monday abruptly reverted to its previous guidance about how coronavirus is transmitted, removing language about airborne transmission it had posted just days earlier.
"A draft version of proposed changes to these recommendations was posted in error to the agency's official website. CDC is currently updating its recommendations regarding airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19). Once this process has been completed, the update language will be posted," Jason McDonald, a CDC spokesman, said in a response emailed to CNN.
The guidance had been quietly updated on Friday, according to the CDC's website. CNN was first to report the change on Sunday. The CDC responded to CNN just before noon on Monday to say it was reverting to the previous guidance.
Despite several studies that have shown the novel coronavirus can spread through small particles in the air, the CDC page now says that Covid-19 is thought to spread mainly between people in close contact -- about 6 feet -- and "through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs, sneezes or talks." This is the same language it posted months ago.
In language posted Friday and now removed, CDC said Covid-19 most commonly spread between people who are in close contact with one another, and went on to say it's known to spread "through respiratory droplets or small particles, such as those in aerosols, produced when an infected person coughs, sneezes, sings, talks or breathes."
These particles can cause infection when "inhaled into the nose, mouth, airways, and lungs," the agency said. "This is thought to be the main way the virus spreads."
"There is growing evidence that droplets and airborne particles can remain suspended in the air and be breathed in by others, and travel distances beyond 6 feet (for example, during choir practice, in restaurants, or in fitness classes)," the page said in the Friday update, which has since been removed. "In general, indoor environments without good ventilation increase this risk."
In the Friday update, the CDC had added new measures to protect yourself in others, including recommendations to use air purifiers to reduce airborne germs in indoors spaces and clear guidance to "stay at least 6 feet away from others, whenever possible." The updated CDC page had also changed language around asymptomatic transmission, shifting from saying "some people without symptoms may be able to spread the virus" to saying "people who are infected but do not show symptoms can spread the virus to others." That language has now been removed.


welovetrump--2020-09-21--“Senate likely has 51 votes to confirm Trump nominee,” According to Ted Cruz

Despite predictions that several GOP senators will refuse to vote , when push comes to shove , most senators will likely stick with their party .
Five Thirty Eight agrees with that assessment : No matter what their electoral considerations are , however , expect most senators to align with their party .
That ’ s what usually happens on high-profile issues .
For example , the confirmation vote for Brett Kavanaugh ’ s Supreme Court nomination was also on the eve of an election ( Oct. 6 , 2018 ) .
West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin , up for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state , broke with his party to vote in favor of Kavanaugh ’ s nomination .
But the other nine Democrats who were up for reelection in 2018 in states that Trump won in 2016 voted against Kavanaugh.2 The one GOP senator up for reelection in 2018 in a state Hillary Clinton won in 2016 , Dean Heller of Nevada , also voted the party line , supporting Kavanagh .
Overall , Manchin was the only Senate Democrat to back Kavanaugh ; Alaska ’ s Lisa Murkowski was the only Republican who didn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Murkowski in a bit . )
Similarly , on the Trump impeachment votes in February , senators up for reelection this year aligned with their parties instead of their states ’ politics when the two conflicted .
( Collins and Gardner opposed both articles of impeachment , whereas Michigan ’ s Gary Peters and Jones voted in favor of both articles . )
Utah ’ s Mitt Romney was the only Republican to vote for Trump ’ s removal , which all Senate Democrats supported .
( More on Romney in a bit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of all , senators may put their personal ideological views ahead of their electoral considerations , particularly on judicial nominations .
After all , it ’ s likely that a Republican senator would be fairly aligned with someone like Kavanaugh on most issues while a Democratic senator would be opposed .
Second , the electoral effects of these kinds of votes are not totally clear .
For example , Montana is more Republican-leaning than Florida , but Montana Democratic incumbent Jon Tester won reelection in 2018 while longtime Florida Democrat Bill Nelson lost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) Manchin voted for Kavanaugh and won , but it ’ s not clear he won because he voted for Kavanaugh .
Third , members of Congress , particularly those in states where they are not electorally safe , must consider their futures if they lose those elections .
And the career incentives for politicians usually point toward sticking with your party on key votes .
Jones was a prominent U.S. attorney , so it ’ s easy to imagine him serving in some legal post in a Biden administration if he should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden should win .
But Democrats would probably be less eager to put Jones in a high-profile role in a Biden administration if Jones had voted for Kavanaugh , opposed impeachment and spent the weeks before the 2020 election urging the Senate to hold a vote on Trump ’ s nominee to replace Ginsburg .
Senators like Gardner and McSally who have been down in the polls for months are probably aware that they are unlikely to be in Congress next year .
So they might be positioning themselves for lobbying jobs ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the people in your party who are still in Congress ) or future runs for other offices .
So to keep doors open to them in GOP circles , Gardner and McSally may align with their party ’ s general posture in this nomination process , even if that approach slightly reduces their chances of winning reelection .

Despite predictions that several GOP senators will refuse to vote, when push comes to shove, most senators will likely stick with their party.
Five Thirty Eight agrees with that assessment:
No matter what their electoral considerations are, however, expect most senators to align with their party. That’s what usually happens on high-profile issues.
For example, the confirmation vote for Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination was also on the eve of an election (Oct. 6, 2018). West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin, up for reelection that November in a very pro-Trump state, broke with his party to vote in favor of Kavanaugh’s nomination. But the other nine Democrats who were up for reelection in 2018 in states that Trump won in 2016 voted against Kavanaugh.2 The one GOP senator up for reelection in 2018 in a state Hillary Clinton won in 2016, Dean Heller of Nevada, also voted the party line, supporting Kavanagh.
Overall, Manchin was the only Senate Democrat to back Kavanaugh; Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski was the only Republican who didn’t support him.3 (More on Murkowski in a bit.)
Similarly, on the Trump impeachment votes in February, senators up for reelection this year aligned with their parties instead of their states’ politics when the two conflicted. (Collins and Gardner opposed both articles of impeachment, whereas Michigan’s Gary Peters and Jones voted in favor of both articles.) Utah’s Mitt Romney was the only Republican to vote for Trump’s removal, which all Senate Democrats supported. (More on Romney in a bit.)
What explains this? First of all, senators may put their personal ideological views ahead of their electoral considerations, particularly on judicial nominations. After all, it’s likely that a Republican senator would be fairly aligned with someone like Kavanaugh on most issues while a Democratic senator would be opposed. Second, the electoral effects of these kinds of votes are not totally clear. For example, Montana is more Republican-leaning than Florida, but Montana Democratic incumbent Jon Tester won reelection in 2018 while longtime Florida Democrat Bill Nelson lost. (Both voted against Kavanaugh.) Manchin voted for Kavanaugh and won, but it’s not clear he won because he voted for Kavanaugh.
Third, members of Congress, particularly those in states where they are not electorally safe, must consider their futures if they lose those elections. And the career incentives for politicians usually point toward sticking with your party on key votes. Jones was a prominent U.S. attorney, so it’s easy to imagine him serving in some legal post in a Biden administration if he should lose reelection in Alabama in November and Biden should win. But Democrats would probably be less eager to put Jones in a high-profile role in a Biden administration if Jones had voted for Kavanaugh, opposed impeachment and spent the weeks before the 2020 election urging the Senate to hold a vote on Trump’s nominee to replace Ginsburg.
Senators like Gardner and McSally who have been down in the polls for months are probably aware that they are unlikely to be in Congress next year. So they might be positioning themselves for lobbying jobs (which usually involves maintaining strong relationships with the people in your party who are still in Congress) or future runs for other offices. So to keep doors open to them in GOP circles, Gardner and McSally may align with their party’s general posture in this nomination process, even if that approach slightly reduces their chances of winning reelection.


welovetrump--2020-09-21--Pelosi Says “We Could Impeach Trump Again” to Prevent SCOTUS Pick: “We Have Arrows in Our Quiver”

An election is less than two months away .
If Pelosi and the Democrats are willing to impeach Trump , then that must mean that they know something that we do n't ... Why would n't they just wait for Trump to lose , if they believe that 's what 's going to happen ?
CNBC confirms that a second impeachment is possible : House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Sunday did not rule out impeaching President Donald Trump or Attorney General William Barr if the Senate tries to push through a Supreme Court nomination during a lame-duck session if Joe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We have our options .
We have arrows in our quiver that I ’ m not about to discuss right now , but the fact is we have a big challenge in our country .
This president has threatened to not even accept the results of the election , ” Pelosi said Sunday on ABC ’ s “ This Week with George Stephanopoulos.
” “ So , right now , our main goal and I think Ruth Bader Ginsburg would want that to be , would be to protect the integrity of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the coronavirus , and that ’ s — I have faith in the American people on this Sunday morning , ” she said .
Only a day after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ’ s death , Trump vowed on Saturday he would pick his nominee in the upcoming week , likely a woman , and said that his administration wants to move ahead with the nomination before the election .
There are several leading contenders on Trump ’ s short list .
Judge Amy Coney Barrett of the 7th Circuit Court of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ front-runner , sources tell NBC News .
As Republicans move ahead in efforts to push a nominee through the Senate Judiciary Committee and to a Senate vote before the year ’ s end , Democrats have pledged to fight the nomination by convincing four Republicans to defect .
So far , two Senate Republicans — Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska — have opposed a vote on the nominee before the election .
When pressed by Stephanopoulos that she ’ s “ not ruling anything out ” regarding an impeachment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ requires Congress “ to use every arrow in our quiver.
” “ We have a responsibility , ” Pelosi said .
“ We take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States .
We have a responsibility to meet the needs of the American people.
” Pelosi also emphasized that Democrats would not shut down the government as leverage to slow the impending nomination .
“ None of us has any interest in shutting down government , that has such a harmful and shameful impact on so many people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ We ’ re not going to be shutting down government .
I do hope , though , that the focus on health care and what it means in terms of the courts will have public opinion be of such magnitude that the Republicans will finally , finally address the coronavirus crisis .
”

An election is less than two months away.
If Pelosi and the Democrats are willing to impeach Trump, then that must mean that they know something that we don't...
Why wouldn't they just wait for Trump to lose, if they believe that's what's going to happen?
CNBC confirms that a second impeachment is possible:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Sunday did not rule out impeaching President Donald Trump or Attorney General William Barr if the Senate tries to push through a Supreme Court nomination during a lame-duck session if Joe Biden wins the November election.
“We have our options. We have arrows in our quiver that I’m not about to discuss right now, but the fact is we have a big challenge in our country. This president has threatened to not even accept the results of the election,” Pelosi said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos.”
“So, right now, our main goal and I think Ruth Bader Ginsburg would want that to be, would be to protect the integrity of the election as we protect the American people from the coronavirus, and that’s — I have faith in the American people on this Sunday morning,” she said.
Only a day after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death, Trump vowed on Saturday he would pick his nominee in the upcoming week, likely a woman, and said that his administration wants to move ahead with the nomination before the election.
There are several leading contenders on Trump’s short list. Judge Amy Coney Barrett of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago has emerged as a front-runner, sources tell NBC News.
As Republicans move ahead in efforts to push a nominee through the Senate Judiciary Committee and to a Senate vote before the year’s end, Democrats have pledged to fight the nomination by convincing four Republicans to defect. So far, two Senate Republicans — Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska — have opposed a vote on the nominee before the election.
When pressed by Stephanopoulos that she’s “not ruling anything out” regarding an impeachment inquiry, Pelosi responded that the Constitution requires Congress “to use every arrow in our quiver.”
“We have a responsibility,” Pelosi said. “We take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. We have a responsibility to meet the needs of the American people.”
Pelosi also emphasized that Democrats would not shut down the government as leverage to slow the impending nomination.
“None of us has any interest in shutting down government, that has such a harmful and shameful impact on so many people in our country,” Pelosi said. “We’re not going to be shutting down government. I do hope, though, that the focus on health care and what it means in terms of the courts will have public opinion be of such magnitude that the Republicans will finally, finally address the coronavirus crisis.”


welovetrump--2020-09-23--Ruth Bader Ginsburg Was NOT The First Woman On The Supreme Court!

Recently in headlines , the left has tried to champion Ruth Bader Ginsburg as a trailblazer .
By definition , a trailblazer is a person who is the first to do something .
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was not the first woman on the Supreme Court by any means .
But you know who was ?
President Ronald Reagan on July 7 , 1981 , nominated O ’ Connor as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court to replace the retiring Potter Stewart .
After the nomination , she also received a unanimous Senate approval making her the first woman ever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court .
Sandra Day O ’ Connor is a trailblazer but being she was a Republican nominated by Reagan she doesn ’ t get much credit .
The left rather champion , Ruth Bader Ginsburg , a Democrat who was nominated by Bill Clinton as a trailblazer .
Things even get more interesting !
O ’ Connor was confirmed just 33 days after she was nominated .
The Supreme Court ’ s official website released this short bio on O ’ Connor : The Dems might of thought trailblazing is made through fashion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ try to rewrite history every chance they get .
The Senate , ending an all-male tradition nearly two centuries old , unanimously confirmed Sandra Day O ’ Connor as an associate justice of the Supreme Court yesterday .
O ’ Connor , a 51-year-old Arizona state appeals judge , will be sworn in Friday in time to join the court for the opening of its 1981-1982 term on Oct. 5 .
Thee vote was 99-0 .
Only Sen. Max Baucus , D-Mont .
who was attending an economic conference in his home state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He had supported O ’ Connor in earlier committee action .
After the vote , O ’ Connor appeared on the steps of the Capitol with Senate leaders , Vice President George Bush and Attorney General William French Smith .
Grinning jubilantly , she said she was overjoyed by the depth of Senate support for her nomination .
“ My hope is that after I ’ ve been across the street and worked for awhile that they ’ ll all feel glad for the wonderful vote they gave me today , ” she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , she said , “ I ’ m going to get very busy , very fast.
” “ Today is truly a historic occasion , ” said Sen. Strom Thurmond , R-S.C. , chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee , leading off a series of 22 speeches in warm praise of President Reagan ’ s first high court nominee .
READER SURVEY : Should President Trump Make English The Official Language of the United States ?
If you would like to learn more about Sandra Day O ’ Connor here is a great @ @

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
1,203 views
It’s time for a little history lesson friends.
Recently in headlines, the left has tried to champion Ruth Bader Ginsburg as a trailblazer.
What is a trailblazer?
By definition, a trailblazer is a person who is the first to do something.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was not the first woman on the Supreme Court by any means.
But you know who was?
Sandra Day O’Connor!
President Ronald Reagan on July 7, 1981, nominated O’Connor as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court to replace the retiring Potter Stewart. After the nomination, she also received a unanimous Senate approval making her the first woman ever to be appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Sandra Day O’Connor is a trailblazer but being she was a Republican nominated by Reagan she doesn’t get much credit. The left rather champion, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a Democrat who was nominated by Bill Clinton as a trailblazer.
On September 21, 1981, the United States Senate confirmed Sandra Day O’Connor, making her the first female Justice to serve on the United States Supreme Court. 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/BVLXwZ4LNb — Future Female Leaders (@FFL_of_America) September 21, 2020
#OTD in 1981, President Reagan’s nominee, Sandra Day O’Connor was officially confirmed, 99-0, as the first woman in history to serve on the Supreme Court! Sandra was an incredible legal mind and an huge inspiration to young girls and women around our country. pic.twitter.com/Ad2KcQOPMt — Marsha Blackburn (@VoteMarsha) September 21, 2020
Things even get more interesting!
O’Connor was confirmed just 33 days after she was nominated.
https://twitter.com/WHRapidResponse/status/1308083654099382272
The Supreme Court’s official website released this short bio on O’Connor:
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Ronald Reagan, and served from 1981 until 2006. Beginning with her childhood growing up on her family’s ranch, the exhibition recalls her life before joining the Supreme Court, her service and accomplishments on the Court, and her continuing legacy off the Court.
The Dems might of thought trailblazing is made through fashion statements.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg leveraged fashion to feminize her role as Supreme Court Justice, in the footsteps of Sandra Day O'Connor (1st woman appointed who wore a white lace jabot)… And she would also wear differing collars to express her judgements + thoughts pic.twitter.com/j4MwtbcoHZ — Shelby Ivey Christie (@bronze_bombSHEL) September 19, 2020
The left will continue to try to rewrite history every chance they get.
Let's have a chat about the notorious RBG and being a trailblazer and all that rot. Sandra Day O'Connor served on SCOTUS for 12 years before RBG was seated. RBG was not the first woman on the court and the writing O'Connor out of history is maddening. — alexandriabrown (@alexthechick) September 21, 2020
So many woman posting such touching tributes to Ruth Bader Ginsburg for leading the way for a woman to serve on the SCOTUS. Next week the same women will be trashing, degrading, spitting all over the woman President Trump nominates, for trying to serve on the SCOTUS. — MARK SIMONE (@MarkSimoneNY) September 20, 2020
Here’s an archive from San Diego Tribune:
The Senate, ending an all-male tradition nearly two centuries old, unanimously confirmed Sandra Day O’Connor as an associate justice of the Supreme Court yesterday. O’Connor, a 51-year-old Arizona state appeals judge, will be sworn in Friday in time to join the court for the opening of its 1981-1982 term on Oct. 5. Thee vote was 99-0. Only Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. who was attending an economic conference in his home state, was missing from the tally. He had supported O’Connor in earlier committee action. 99.9% Pure Investor Grade Silver Trump Collector Coins! After the vote, O’Connor appeared on the steps of the Capitol with Senate leaders, Vice President George Bush and Attorney General William French Smith. Grinning jubilantly, she said she was overjoyed by the depth of Senate support for her nomination. “My hope is that after I’ve been across the street and worked for awhile that they’ll all feel glad for the wonderful vote they gave me today,” she said. Once installed on the court, she said, “I’m going to get very busy, very fast.” “Today is truly a historic occasion,” said Sen. Strom Thurmond, R-S.C., chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, leading off a series of 22 speeches in warm praise of President Reagan’s first high court nominee.
If you would like to learn more about Sandra Day O’Connor here is a great video:


welovetrump--2020-09-23--Hundreds of Trump Supporters Parade On Route 30

Okay , my friends , it ’ s official .
The enthusiasm for Trump is totally off the charts !
In the swing state of Pennsylvania right smack on route 30 was a gigantic pro-Trump parade .
It was reported that hundreds of cars , trucks , and motorcycles traveled all along route 30 honking and waving their Trump 2020 flags .
Trib Live filled us in with these details : A convoy of hundreds of cars , trucks and motorcycles paraded down Route 30 on Sunday , with horns blaring , flags waving and shouts of “ four more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ensuing rally at Irwin Park , was held to support the reelection of President Trump .
Bruce Egan of North Huntingdon drove an antique tow truck decked out in Trump flags , Trump campaign signs and a sign saying “ Back the Blue.
” “ It ’ s a way that you can try to keep the country from going to hell , ” Egan said .
“ I think Trump has changed the direction in a lot of ways.
” Parade participants gathered Sunday morning in the Norwin Hills Shopping Center .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with participants tossing a football around , chatting with fellow Trump supporters and playing country music from their truck radios .
KDK Radio chipped in with this brief statement : The parade was escorted by Irwin police .
They then traveled down Route 30 to Norwin Town Square , then to Irwin Park for a rally where local Republican officials spoke .
The event was organized by area Trump supporters .
I ’ m sure the law enforcement officers were more than happy to escort the parade .
Organizers for Biden ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are always too small .
NATIONAL POLL : Is CNN The Enemy Of The People ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
803 views
Okay, my friends, it’s official.
The enthusiasm for Trump is totally off the charts!
In the swing state of Pennsylvania right smack on route 30 was a gigantic pro-Trump parade.
It was reported that hundreds of cars, trucks, and motorcycles traveled all along route 30 honking and waving their Trump 2020 flags.
https://twitter.com/GrrrGraphics/status/1308040511114993665
A convoy of hundreds of cars, trucks and motorcycles paraded down Route 30 on Sunday, with horns blaring, flags waving and shouts of “four more years.” https://t.co/CB0u1sRFSM — TribLIVE.com (@TribLIVE) September 21, 2020
@POTUS @realDonaldTrump rally in Irwin PA Sunday at Irwin Park. This was all after by a “Trump Parade” up and down Rt. 30 in North Huntington. Rally had close to 1000 people at it peak attend it. pic.twitter.com/Fn9hfKVhUj — Ed Thompson (@ThompsonFoto12) September 21, 2020
Absolutely MASSIVE Trump Car parade in North Huntingdon, Pennsylvania today 🇺🇸🚘 Pennsylvania is Trump country! https://t.co/mxHDau9CTd — Abigail Marone (@abigailmarone) September 21, 2020
Trib Live filled us in with these details:
A convoy of hundreds of cars, trucks and motorcycles paraded down Route 30 on Sunday, with horns blaring, flags waving and shouts of “four more years.” The parade, and the ensuing rally at Irwin Park, was held to support the reelection of President Trump. Bruce Egan of North Huntingdon drove an antique tow truck decked out in Trump flags, Trump campaign signs and a sign saying “Back the Blue.” “It’s a way that you can try to keep the country from going to hell,” Egan said. “I think Trump has changed the direction in a lot of ways.” Parade participants gathered Sunday morning in the Norwin Hills Shopping Center. The pre-parade atmosphere was like a tailgate, with participants tossing a football around, chatting with fellow Trump supporters and playing country music from their truck radios.
Supporters of President Donald Trump are planning a flag-waving vehicle parade along Route 30 in Irwin and North Huntingdon on Sunday with a rally afterward. https://t.co/Xu0WIDzKoL — TribWestmoreland (@TribWestmoreCo) September 14, 2020
KDK Radio chipped in with this brief statement:
The parade was escorted by Irwin police. They then traveled down Route 30 to Norwin Town Square, then to Irwin Park for a rally where local Republican officials spoke. NATIONAL POLL: Should Fauci Be Prosecuted For LYING To Congress? The event was organized by area Trump supporters.
I’m sure the law enforcement officers were more than happy to escort the parade.
Organizers for Biden’s parade never need an escort because they are always too small.
#BidenHarris2020 campaign attempts to replicate the @realDonaldTrump car parade format…resulting in Jill Biden& Doug Emhoff spectating a “parade” of 3 cars on a residential street: Democrats just don’t GET it🤣pic.twitter.com/3dd5AOZU1k — DrConservaMom🇺🇸🐸🌐 (@ConservaMomUSA) September 16, 2020
See!
Just three cars!


welovetrump--2020-09-24--Hysterical Liberals: F-CK RGB FOR NOT RETIRING!!!

It was only inevitbale that Leftist activists would find no one but RGB herself to blame for their current predicament @ @ @ @ @ She could have , afterall , retired long ago after years of ill health and @ @ @ @ @ to secure a replacement inder Barack Obama .
But she stayed , and the rest @ @ @ @ @ .
And some the her surviving ideologues are outright enraged .

It was only inevitbale that Leftist activists would find no one but RGB herself to blame for their current predicament in the Supreme Court.
She could have, afterall, retired long ago after years of ill health and the perfect oppurtinity for Democrats to secure a replacement inder Barack Obama.
But she stayed, and the rest as they, is history.
And some the her surviving ideologues are outright enraged.


welovetrump--2020-09-23--Louisville Vandalism Erupts: Restaurants Destroyed; Business Owner Surrounded By Protesters

An armed BLM protester almost pulled out his gun after the charges ( or lack thereof ) were announced .
@ @ @ @ @ was going to begin shooting people .
Fortunately , we never found out .
The @ @ @ @ @ forced him to stop and keep his gun away .

An armed BLM protester almost pulled out his gun after the charges (or lack thereof) were announced.
It is unclear if he was going to begin shooting people.
Fortunately, we never found out.
The crowd encircled the man and forced him to stop and keep his gun away.


welovetrump--2020-09-23--Losing It: Dems Call To Pack The Court

Losing It: Dems Call To Pack The Court

Over the last few days , Democrats have been having full blown panic attacks over the death of Supreme Court @ @ @ @ @ Because now , President Trump and the Republican led Senate can tilt the court in @ @ @ @ @ their preferred ideologue Liberal activists .
Now they are threatening to do whatever they have @ @ @ @ @ the impacts of this pivotal moment in history .
Their favorite is packing the Supreme @ @ @ @ @ of Justices serving .

Over the last few days, Democrats have been having full blown panic attacks over the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Why?
Because now, President Trump and the Republican led Senate can tilt the court in favor if textualists, not their preferred ideologue Liberal activists.
Now they are threatening to do whatever they have to to nullify or blunt the impacts of this pivotal moment in history.
Their favorite is packing the Supreme Court by expanding the number of Justices serving.


welovetrump--2020-09-23--BLM Battles Louisville Police in Broad Daylight: “All Y’all Get Ready to F****** Die!”

BLM `` peaceful protesters '' are battling Louisville police… RIGHT NOW .
It is official : Only 1 police officer @ @ @ @ @ case of Breonna Taylor .
The officer was charged with endangering the neighbors .
It @ @ @ @ @ her death .
Typically , the protests are peaceful during the day and then get @ @ @ @ @ , violence is already breaking out… in BROAD DAYLIGHT .
This is not a good @ @ @ @ @ nightfall comes .
See the first initial clash with police below :

BLM "peaceful protesters" are battling Louisville police… RIGHT NOW.
It is official:
Only 1 police officer has been charged in the case of Breonna Taylor.
The officer was charged with endangering the neighbors.
It has nothing to do with her death.
Now…
BLM activists are furious.
Typically, the protests are peaceful during the day and then get violent at night.
However, violence is already breaking out… in BROAD DAYLIGHT.
This is not a good sign for the city when nightfall comes.
See the first initial clash with police below:


welovetrump--2020-09-23--Dem Meltdown: “Unkind” Of McConnell To Move Forward With SCOUTUS Nomination

It 's quite legal , in fact required by the President of the United States to put forth a nomination @ @ @ @ @ Seat becomes vacant .
Despite what the left would have you believe , it is @ @ @ @ @ .
That being said , The Dems would have you believe it is not very @ @ @ @

It's quite legal, in fact required by the President of the United States to put forth a nomination when a Supreme Court Justice Seat becomes vacant.
Despite what the left would have you believe, it is quite legal and Constitutionally neccessary.
That being said, The Dems would have you believe it is not very "nice."


welovetrump--2020-09-23--BLM Protesters Form “Front Line” with Riot Shields Before Clashing with Police

The situation in Louisville is getting out of control… .
According to multiple posts on social media , BLM protesters @ @ @ @ @ line '' with riot shields .
This was before they clashed with the police .
@ @ @ @ @ Louisville have been charged for the death of Breonna Taylor .
Now , BLM activists @ @ @ @ @ .
See the fotoage below :

The situation in Louisville is getting out of control….
And fast!
According to multiple posts on social media, BLM protesters have created a "front line" with riot shields.
This was before they clashed with the police.
Why?
None of the officers in Louisville have been charged for the death of Breonna Taylor.
Now, BLM activists are taking to the streets.
See the fotoage below:


welovetrump--2020-09-23--Antifa Arrives in Louisville After Breonna Taylor Decision; U-Haul Riot Truck Unloaded Live on Socia

Antifa Arrives in Louisville After Breonna Taylor Decision; U-Haul Riot Truck Unloaded Live on Social Media

It 's official : no officers have been directly charged with Breonna Taylor 's death .
One of the officers @ @ @ @ @ her Taylor 's neighbors .
But none of the officers were charged with her death @ @ @ @ @ beginning to swell in Louisville .
And it gets worse than that… Videos and reports @ @ @ @ @ Antifa has arrived in Louisville .
One video shows a U-haul truck filled with riot @ @ @ @ @ , and other equipment being unloaded in the city .

It's official: no officers have been directly charged with Breonna Taylor's death.
One of the officers was charged with recklessly endangering her Taylor's neighbors.
But none of the officers were charged with her death.
Now… BLM protests are beginning to swell in Louisville.
And it gets worse than that…
Videos and reports on social media incidate that Antifa has arrived in Louisville.
One video shows a U-haul truck filled with riot shields, signs, hammers, and other equipment being unloaded in the city.


welovetrump--2020-09-23--Bodycam Footage Shows LAPD Cop Shooting Foam-Covered Bullet at BLM Protester’s Groin, Hitting Testic

Bodycam Footage Shows LAPD Cop Shooting Foam-Covered Bullet at BLM Protester’s Groin, Hitting Testicles

Police are now investigating the officer 's actions .
According to the Daily Mail : California police have released bodycam footage that shows a Black Lives Matter protester being shot in the groin with a foam bullet during a march in Los Angeles .
The video shows 28-year-old photographer Ben Montemayor being shot by a 40mm foam pellet gun along Hollywood Boulevard on June 20 .
Montemayor has already announced his intention to sue the LAPD , saying he required emergency surgery when one of his testicles swelled to twice its normal size after he was shot .
Police subsequently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The bodycam footage was released Friday , as part of the police probe .
The footage shows a group of officers who were sent to tackle protesters who were gathering on part of Hollywood Boulevard on June 20 .
In the video , officers run towards a junction of Hollywood Boulevard and another street as bottles are thrown at them , and attempt to clear the activists away .
Two protesters can be seen standing on the crosswalk holding a banner , one of whom has his hands raised in the air @ @ @ @ @ @ @ push the man with his hands up away from the crossing .
He takes a single step towards the officers , and is shot in the groin .
Montemayor told the LA Times that he was trying to help up a friend who had been pushed to the ground when he was shot .
He said fellow protesters helped him away from the scene , and that afterwards he went to hospital when one of his testicles swelled to twice its normal size .
He was taken in for emergency surgery which lasted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ preserve his ability to have children .
Montemayor has said he intends to file a lawsuit , and referred all questions to attorney Dan Stormer .
He described the shooting as a 'brutal assault ' and said the video shows that 'in some ways , it 's even worse than we thought . '
Dismissing the police investigation , he said the department were simply covering their own backs 'to protect themselves from the lawsuit that is coming ' .
LAPD policy states that crowd-control weapons , such as foam bullets , should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than five feet away .

Police are now investigating the officer's actions.
According to the Daily Mail:
California police have released bodycam footage that shows a Black Lives Matter protester being shot in the groin with a foam bullet during a march in Los Angeles.
The video shows 28-year-old photographer Ben Montemayor being shot by a 40mm foam pellet gun along Hollywood Boulevard on June 20.
Montemayor has already announced his intention to sue the LAPD, saying he required emergency surgery when one of his testicles swelled to twice its normal size after he was shot.
Police subsequently announced their own investigation into the shooting.
The bodycam footage was released Friday, as part of the police probe.
The footage shows a group of officers who were sent to tackle protesters who were gathering on part of Hollywood Boulevard on June 20.
In the video, officers run towards a junction of Hollywood Boulevard and another street as bottles are thrown at them, and attempt to clear the activists away.
Two protesters can be seen standing on the crosswalk holding a banner, one of whom has his hands raised in the air.
Officers take the banner away and push the man with his hands up away from the crossing. He takes a single step towards the officers, and is shot in the groin.
Montemayor told the LA Times that he was trying to help up a friend who had been pushed to the ground when he was shot.
He said fellow protesters helped him away from the scene, and that afterwards he went to hospital when one of his testicles swelled to twice its normal size.
He was taken in for emergency surgery which lasted around three hours in an attempt to preserve his ability to have children.
Montemayor has said he intends to file a lawsuit, and referred all questions to attorney Dan Stormer.
He described the shooting as a 'brutal assault' and said the video shows that 'in some ways, it's even worse than we thought.'
Dismissing the police investigation, he said the department were simply covering their own backs 'to protect themselves from the lawsuit that is coming'.
LAPD policy states that crowd-control weapons, such as foam bullets, should only be used on people that are more than five feet away.