welovetrump--2020-04-23--SCOTUS Delivers Major Victory for Trump: Approves Deporting Jamaican Immigrant for Crimes

There are an estimated 1.9 million non-citizens in the United States who have criminal convictions .
Based on the new ruling , these 1.9 million non-citizens would be considered deportable .
The topic of immigration has once again become a hot-button issue after President Trump announced that he would temporarily suspend immigration for 60 days due to the COVID-19 pandemic .
Reuters has more details on the case , its history , and the dissent written by liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor : The court ruled 5-4 to uphold a lower court decision that found a legal permanent resident from Jamaica @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his deportation canceled under a U.S. law that lets some longtime legal residents avoid expulsion .
The conservative justices were in the majority , with the liberal justices dissenting .
Barton , a 42-year-old car repair shop manager and father of four , was targeted for deportation after criminal convictions in Georgia for drug and gun crimes .
The decision could affect thousands of immigrants with criminal convictions - many for minor offenses - who reside legally in the United States .
There are more than 13 million legal U.S. permanent residents , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ holders , according to the Department of Homeland Security .
Glenn Fogle , an attorney for Barton , called the ruling “ extremely disappointing ” and expressed concern for his client , who has already been sent back to Jamaica .
“ My heart goes out to Mr. Barton and his family as he is now effectively barred from ever rejoining them in the United States , ” Fogle said .
The Trump administration argued against Barton ’ s bid to avoid deportation .
Trump ’ s hardline stance on both legal and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of his presidency and his 2020 re-election campaign .
He has justified his immigration crackdown in part by citing crimes committed by immigrants .
Permanent residents selected for deportation may apply to have their removal canceled if they have been living continuously in the United States for at least seven years , except if they have committed certain serious felonies .
At issue in the case was the meaning of a 1996 change - known as the “ stop-time rule ” - in U.S. immigration law .
This provision disqualifies immigrants who commit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stopping the clock on their period of continuous residency .
The federal government had said the rule was triggered in Barton ’ s case because his assault charge would bar his admission into the country , even though as of 1996 he had resided in the United States too long to be declared deportable for that crime .
Barton argued that he could not be found inadmissible because he had already been lawfully admitted .
While noting that deporting a permanent resident is a “ wrenching process , ” conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , disagreed .
“ Removal is particularly difficult when it involves someone such as Barton who has spent most of his life in the United States , ” wrote Kavanaugh , appointed to the court by Trump in 2018 .
“ Congress made a choice , however , to authorize removal of noncitizens - even lawful permanent residents - who have committed certain serious crimes.
” In a dissent , liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the ruling “ at odds with common sense.
” Sotomayor noted that the immigration judge who heard Barton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ preferred to grant Barton ’ s bid to avoid deportation , noting that he had rehabilitated and that his four children were all U.S. citizens .

There are an estimated 1.9 million non-citizens in the United States who have criminal convictions.
Based on the new ruling, these 1.9 million non-citizens would be considered deportable.
The topic of immigration has once again become a hot-button issue after President Trump announced that he would temporarily suspend immigration for 60 days due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Reuters has more details on the case, its history, and the dissent written by liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor:
The court ruled 5-4 to uphold a lower court decision that found a legal permanent resident from Jamaica named Andre Martello Barton ineligible to have his deportation canceled under a U.S. law that lets some longtime legal residents avoid expulsion. The conservative justices were in the majority, with the liberal justices dissenting.
Barton, a 42-year-old car repair shop manager and father of four, was targeted for deportation after criminal convictions in Georgia for drug and gun crimes.
The decision could affect thousands of immigrants with criminal convictions - many for minor offenses - who reside legally in the United States. There are more than 13 million legal U.S. permanent residents, also known as “green card” holders, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
Glenn Fogle, an attorney for Barton, called the ruling “extremely disappointing” and expressed concern for his client, who has already been sent back to Jamaica.
“My heart goes out to Mr. Barton and his family as he is now effectively barred from ever rejoining them in the United States,” Fogle said.
The Trump administration argued against Barton’s bid to avoid deportation.
Trump’s hardline stance on both legal and illegal immigration has been a key feature of his presidency and his 2020 re-election campaign. He has justified his immigration crackdown in part by citing crimes committed by immigrants.
Permanent residents selected for deportation may apply to have their removal canceled if they have been living continuously in the United States for at least seven years, except if they have committed certain serious felonies.
At issue in the case was the meaning of a 1996 change - known as the “stop-time rule” - in U.S. immigration law. This provision disqualifies immigrants who commit certain crimes from this discretionary benefit by stopping the clock on their period of continuous residency.
The federal government had said the rule was triggered in Barton’s case because his assault charge would bar his admission into the country, even though as of 1996 he had resided in the United States too long to be declared deportable for that crime.
Barton argued that he could not be found inadmissible because he had already been lawfully admitted.
While noting that deporting a permanent resident is a “wrenching process,” conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the majority on Thursday, disagreed.
“Removal is particularly difficult when it involves someone such as Barton who has spent most of his life in the United States,” wrote Kavanaugh, appointed to the court by Trump in 2018. “Congress made a choice, however, to authorize removal of noncitizens - even lawful permanent residents - who have committed certain serious crimes.”
In a dissent, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the ruling “at odds with common sense.” Sotomayor noted that the immigration judge who heard Barton’s case said she would have preferred to grant Barton’s bid to avoid deportation, noting that he had rehabilitated and that his four children were all U.S. citizens.


welovetrump--2020-04-23--“I Will NOT Resign”: Pro-Trump Democrat Vernon Jones Changes Mind, Decides to Fight Against Liberal

“I Will NOT Resign”: Pro-Trump Democrat Vernon Jones Changes Mind, Decides to Fight Against Liberal “Bullies”

How quickly the tides can turn !
Yesterday , we reported that pro-Trump Democrat Vernon Jones announced that he would @ @ @ @ @ re-election .
Jones decided to resign after overwhelming pressure from the Democratic base .
After @ @ @ @ @ Trump , he received fierce backlash from the far left , many of whom used @ @ @ @ @ But after announcing his resignation , Jones received so much support from Republicans , centrist @ @ @ @ @ he has changed his mind !
In a recorded video statement on Twitter , Jones @ @ @ @ @ NOT resign !
” He has also vowed to fight against liberal “ bullies ” @ @ @ @ @ for the reelection of President Trump .
More details on this rapidly developing story below @

How quickly the tides can turn!
Yesterday, we reported that pro-Trump Democrat Vernon Jones announced that he would resign immediately rather than seek re-election.
Jones decided to resign after overwhelming pressure from the Democratic base.
After the Georgia representative endorsed President Trump, he received fierce backlash from the far left, many of whom used racial slurs against him.
But after announcing his resignation, Jones received so much support from Republicans, centrist Democrats, and Independents that he has changed his mind!
In a recorded video statement on Twitter, Jones declared, “I will NOT resign!”
He has also vowed to fight against liberal “bullies” and plans to continue fighting for the reelection of President Trump.
More details on this rapidly developing story below:


welovetrump--2020-04-25--New Evidence Supporting Sexual Assault Allegation Against Biden Emerges

This whole story on the sexual assault allegation against Biden just got a lot more interesting .
New evidence has emerged today that potentially corroborates the sexual assault allegation by Tara Reade against Joe Biden .
Reade was a senate aide and has accused Biden of forcefully pushing her against a wall , kissing her , and penetrating her with his fingers in 1993 .
Apparently , Reade told her mother , brother , and close friend about the incident with Biden .
Reade ’ s mother has since passed , but both her brother and friend confirm that Reade @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incident .
What gets even more interesting is that Reade ’ s mother possibly made a call in to the Larry King Live show in 1993 .
During the call , the woman hints that something happened to her daughter , a senate staffer , on Capitol Hill .
Read the latest details on the new evidence from The Intercept : of evidence has emerged buttressing the credibility of Tara Reade ’ s claim that she told her mother about allegations of sexual harassment and assault related to her former boss , then-Sen. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spokesperson , has denied the allegations .
Reade has claimed to various media outlets , including The Intercept , that she told her mother , a close friend , and her brother about both the harassment and , to varying degrees of detail , the assault at the time .
Her brother , Collin Moulton , and her friend , who has asked to remain anonymous , both confirmed that they heard about the allegations from Reade at the time .
Reade ’ s mother died in 2016 , but both her brother @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her mother , and that her mother , a longtime feminist and activist , urged her to go to the police .
In interviews with The Intercept , Reade also mentioned that her mother had made a phone call to “ Larry King Live ” on CNN , during which she made reference to her daughter ’ s experience on Capitol Hill .
Reade told The Intercept that her mother called in asking for advice after Reade , then in her 20s , left Biden ’ s office .
“ I remember it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my daughter was sexually harassed and retaliated against and fired , where can she go for help ?
I was mortified , ” Reade told me .
Reade couldn ’ t remember the date or the year of the phone call , and King didn ’ t include the names of callers on his show .
I was unable to find the call , but mentioned it in an interview with Katie Halper , the podcast host who first aired Reade ’ s allegation .
After the podcast aired , a listener managed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to The Intercept .
While it hasn ’ t been confirmed that the woman in the call is indeed Reade ’ s mother , details about the call indicate it could quite possibly be her .
A piece by New York Magazine has further information on the call : Though the Intercept story doesn ’ t confirm that the Larry King caller was indeed Reade ’ s mother , some biographical details do match up .
The caller and Reade ’ s mother , who died in 2016 , lived in San Luis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reade would have just left Biden ’ s office around the time of the call .
Reade told the Intercept in previous interviews that her mother had called into the Larry King Show , though she couldn ’ t recall the date .
Hours after the Intercept published its report , the conservative Media Research Group published a clip of the episode in question ; Reade confirmed to Holly Otterbein of Politico that she could hear her mother ’ s voice .
Reade has said that in 1993 , Biden pushed her up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , kissed her , and then digitally penetrated her underneath her skirt .
In 2019 , she told reporters that the former vice president had touched her neck and ran his fingers through her hair on several occasions , which made her one of over a half dozen women to say that Biden had kissed or touched them in ways that made them uncomfortable .
Through representatives , Biden has consistently denied assaulting Reade , and it is generally difficult for journalists to prove that a sexual assault definitively occurred .
Deficiencies in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stigma associated with public identification as a victim of sexual abuse can also prevent a person from reporting an attack to the police , let alone the press .
But key aspects of Reade ’ s account — namely , that she told friends and relatives about the incident — have proven true .
The New York Times previously confirmed that Reade told a friend about the attack when it allegedly occurred .
“ Another friend and a brother of Ms. Reade ’ s said she told them over the years about a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” the Times reported .
The Washington Post confirmed another Reade claim : that her professional responsibilities changed around the time of the alleged assault .
Reade initially oversaw internships in Biden ’ s Senate office .
But two former interns “ recalled that Reade abruptly stopped overseeing them in April — just a few weeks after the interns arrived — but neither was aware of the circumstances that led to her departure , ” the Post found .
You can watch the full clip from the Larry King Live show right here @

This whole story on the sexual assault allegation against Biden just got a lot more interesting.
New evidence has emerged today that potentially corroborates the sexual assault allegation by Tara Reade against Joe Biden. Reade was a senate aide and has accused Biden of forcefully pushing her against a wall, kissing her, and penetrating her with his fingers in 1993.
Apparently, Reade told her mother, brother, and close friend about the incident with Biden. Reade’s mother has since passed, but both her brother and friend confirm that Reade did in fact tell them about the incident.
What gets even more interesting is that Reade’s mother possibly made a call in to the Larry King Live show in 1993. During the call, the woman hints that something happened to her daughter, a senate staffer, on Capitol Hill.
Read the latest details on the new evidence from The Intercept:
A NEW PIECE of evidence has emerged buttressing the credibility of Tara Reade’s claim that she told her mother about allegations of sexual harassment and assault related to her former boss, then-Sen. Joe Biden. Biden, through a spokesperson, has denied the allegations. Reade has claimed to various media outlets, including The Intercept, that she told her mother, a close friend, and her brother about both the harassment and, to varying degrees of detail, the assault at the time. Her brother, Collin Moulton, and her friend, who has asked to remain anonymous, both confirmed that they heard about the allegations from Reade at the time. Reade’s mother died in 2016, but both her brother and friend also confirmed Reade had told her mother, and that her mother, a longtime feminist and activist, urged her to go to the police. In interviews with The Intercept, Reade also mentioned that her mother had made a phone call to “Larry King Live” on CNN, during which she made reference to her daughter’s experience on Capitol Hill. Reade told The Intercept that her mother called in asking for advice after Reade, then in her 20s, left Biden’s office. “I remember it being an anonymous call and her saying my daughter was sexually harassed and retaliated against and fired, where can she go for help? I was mortified,” Reade told me. Reade couldn’t remember the date or the year of the phone call, and King didn’t include the names of callers on his show. I was unable to find the call, but mentioned it in an interview with Katie Halper, the podcast host who first aired Reade’s allegation. After the podcast aired, a listener managed to find the call and sent it to The Intercept.
While it hasn’t been confirmed that the woman in the call is indeed Reade’s mother, details about the call indicate it could quite possibly be her.
A piece by New York Magazine has further information on the call:
Though the Intercept story doesn’t confirm that the Larry King caller was indeed Reade’s mother, some biographical details do match up. The caller and Reade’s mother, who died in 2016, lived in San Luis Obispo County in August 1993, and Reade would have just left Biden’s office around the time of the call. Reade told the Intercept in previous interviews that her mother had called into the Larry King Show, though she couldn’t recall the date. Hours after the Intercept published its report, the conservative Media Research Group published a clip of the episode in question; Reade confirmed to Holly Otterbein of Politico that she could hear her mother’s voice. Reade has said that in 1993, Biden pushed her up against a wall in the Senate complex, kissed her, and then digitally penetrated her underneath her skirt. In 2019, she told reporters that the former vice president had touched her neck and ran his fingers through her hair on several occasions, which made her one of over a half dozen women to say that Biden had kissed or touched them in ways that made them uncomfortable. Through representatives, Biden has consistently denied assaulting Reade, and it is generally difficult for journalists to prove that a sexual assault definitively occurred. Deficiencies in the criminal-justice system and the fear and stigma associated with public identification as a victim of sexual abuse can also prevent a person from reporting an attack to the police, let alone the press. But key aspects of Reade’s account — namely, that she told friends and relatives about the incident — have proven true. The New York Times previously confirmed that Reade told a friend about the attack when it allegedly occurred. “Another friend and a brother of Ms. Reade’s said she told them over the years about a traumatic sexual incident involving Mr. Biden,” the Times reported. The Washington Post confirmed another Reade claim: that her professional responsibilities changed around the time of the alleged assault. Reade initially oversaw internships in Biden’s Senate office. But two former interns “recalled that Reade abruptly stopped overseeing them in April — just a few weeks after the interns arrived — but neither was aware of the circumstances that led to her departure,” the Post found.
You can watch the full clip from the Larry King Live show right here:


welovetrump--2020-04-25--AOC Has Meltdown on Congressional Floor Over Stimulus Bill

If she weren ’ t a politician with power , it ’ d almost be hilarious to see Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ’ s rants .
Yesterday on the House floor , AOC went into a full-blown tamper tantrum , claiming the latest $ 484 billion stimulus bill is “ too small.
” This just after Congress passed a stimulus bill in excess of $ 2 trillion dollars last month !
What would be enough ?
Another trillion ?
Two trillion ?
At some point we have to be concerned about the massive debt our country is accumulating .
The New York @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to vote against the bill .
Fox News reports on AOC ’ s decision to vote “ nay ” on the latest stimulus bill : Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , D-N.Y. , defended her “ nay ” vote during the House ’ s largely bipartisan passage of a $ 484 billion coronavirus relief package on Thursday , calling it “ too small.
” The progressive lawmaker — whose state has been ravaged by the coronavirus , with the highest numbers of infections and deaths in the country — said the bill left out any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rent or purchase necessities including food after being left jobless or stranded due to the virus .
That , compounded with the lack of a timeline for another vote on additional aid , made her the single Democrat in the House to vote against the bill , she said .
“ My concern is that we are giving away the farm , ” Ocasio-Cortez told reporters after the vote .
“ I can not go back to my communities and tell them to just wait for CARES four because we have now passed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s related to coronavirus .
And every time it ’ s the next one , the next one , the next one , and my constituents are dying.
” That , compounded with the lack of a timeline for another vote on additional aid , made her the single Democrat in the House to vote against the bill , she said .
“ My concern is that we are giving away the farm , ” Ocasio-Cortez told reporters after the vote .
“ I can not go back to my communities and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ four because we have now passed three , four pieces of legislation that ’ s related to coronavirus .
And every time it ’ s the next one , the next one , the next one , and my constituents are dying.
” Check out some of the latest responses to AOC on Twitter :

If she weren’t a politician with power, it’d almost be hilarious to see Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s rants.
Yesterday on the House floor, AOC went into a full-blown tamper tantrum, claiming the latest $484 billion stimulus bill is “too small.”
This just after Congress passed a stimulus bill in excess of $2 trillion dollars last month!
What would be enough? Another trillion? Two trillion? At some point we have to be concerned about the massive debt our country is accumulating.
The New York representative ended up being the only Democrat to vote against the bill.
Fox News reports on AOC’s decision to vote “nay” on the latest stimulus bill:
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., defended her “nay” vote during the House’s largely bipartisan passage of a $484 billion coronavirus relief package on Thursday, calling it “too small.” The progressive lawmaker — whose state has been ravaged by the coronavirus, with the highest numbers of infections and deaths in the country — said the bill left out any real aid for Americans struggling to pay rent or purchase necessities including food after being left jobless or stranded due to the virus. That, compounded with the lack of a timeline for another vote on additional aid, made her the single Democrat in the House to vote against the bill, she said. “My concern is that we are giving away the farm,” Ocasio-Cortez told reporters after the vote. “I cannot go back to my communities and tell them to just wait for CARES four because we have now passed three, four pieces of legislation that’s related to coronavirus. And every time it’s the next one, the next one, the next one, and my constituents are dying.” That, compounded with the lack of a timeline for another vote on additional aid, made her the single Democrat in the House to vote against the bill, she said. “My concern is that we are giving away the farm,” Ocasio-Cortez told reporters after the vote. “I cannot go back to my communities and tell them to just wait for CARES four because we have now passed three, four pieces of legislation that’s related to coronavirus. And every time it’s the next one, the next one, the next one, and my constituents are dying.”
Check out some of the latest responses to AOC on Twitter:


welovetrump--2020-04-24--Trump Will Lose in a “Landslide” Due to “Mental Illness,” Rosie O’Donnell Predicts

The fued between Donald Trump and Rosie O'Donnell goes back decades .
In 2016 , she publicly said demeaning things about Barron Trump , suggesting that he has autism .
She even said that her and her wife would move out of the United States if Trump was elected president ... but like all the other Hollywood celebs who made that `` threat , '' they 're still here .
The Hill has more details on O'Donnell 's `` landslide '' prediction : Rosie O'Donnell , a longtime critic of President Trump , said in a recent interview she thinks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by a `` landslide , '' adding that she firmly believes the voters will “ rise to the occasion ” and vote him out in November .
When asked about the coming election during an appearance on Marc Maron 's `` WTF '' podcast that aired on Monday , O ’ Donnell said : `` I think November we 're gon na be a landslide and take him out , that 's what I have to believe . ''
“ I firmly believe that the heart of the nation is bigger than his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the occasion and vote him out , ” she continued .
“ That ’ s what I hope.
” During the interview , O ’ Donnell , who said last year that she believed the president would be arrested before this year ’ s election , also spoke on her feud with Trump , which dates back to years before he became president .
O ’ Donnell said that she had only ever met Trump on two occasions — once when during his wedding to Marla Maples in the early '90s and another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Survivor.
” “ I met him once , twice , once at his wedding , because when he was marrying Marla Maples , we had shared a mutual leading man , ” she said .
“ She was in ‘ Will Rogers Follies ’ and I did ‘ Grease.
’ And we had the same guy , well , he invited me to be his date.
” “ I met him , he shook my hand , ” she continued .
“ And then I met him once at the celebrity , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I was the host of the ‘ Survivor ’ finale and he was in talking terms with Mark Burnett to see about doing ‘ The Apprentice.
’ ” Talking about Barnett , a TV producer who created “ The Apprentice , ” O'Donnell said that she blames him “ for the vast majority of the problems this nation has , coming to terms with who he is in actuality.
” Polling suggests that Biden may have a lead in key battleground states , but these same polls were proven dramatically wrong in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , making inroads with communities that Republicans have traditionally struggled to gain traction with .
As Democrats continue to politicize the pandemic and make far-off predictions , President Trump is focused on protecting American lives and livelihoods .

The fued between Donald Trump and Rosie O'Donnell goes back decades.
In 2016, she publicly said demeaning things about Barron Trump, suggesting that he has autism.
She even said that her and her wife would move out of the United States if Trump was elected president... but like all the other Hollywood celebs who made that "threat," they're still here.
The Hill has more details on O'Donnell's "landslide" prediction:
Rosie O'Donnell, a longtime critic of President Trump, said in a recent interview she thinks the president will lose the 2020 election by a "landslide," adding that she firmly believes the voters will “rise to the occasion” and vote him out in November.
When asked about the coming election during an appearance on Marc Maron's "WTF" podcast that aired on Monday, O’Donnell said: "I think November we're gonna be a landslide and take him out, that's what I have to believe."
“I firmly believe that the heart of the nation is bigger than his mental illness and people will rise to the occasion and vote him out,” she continued. “That’s what I hope.”
During the interview, O’Donnell, who said last year that she believed the president would be arrested before this year’s election, also spoke on her feud with Trump, which dates back to years before he became president.
O’Donnell said that she had only ever met Trump on two occasions — once when during his wedding to Marla Maples in the early '90s and another time in 2002 when she hosted “Survivor.”
“I met him once, twice, once at his wedding, because when he was marrying Marla Maples, we had shared a mutual leading man,” she said. “She was in ‘Will Rogers Follies’ and I did ‘Grease.’ And we had the same guy, well, he invited me to be his date.”
“I met him, he shook my hand,” she continued. “And then I met him once at the celebrity, I mean at the ‘Survivor’ finale. I was the host of the ‘Survivor’ finale and he was in talking terms with Mark Burnett to see about doing ‘The Apprentice.’ ”
Talking about Barnett, a TV producer who created “The Apprentice,” O'Donnell said that she blames him “for the vast majority of the problems this nation has, coming to terms with who he is in actuality.”
Polling suggests that Biden may have a lead in key battleground states, but these same polls were proven dramatically wrong in 2016.
Trump coalition continues to grow, making inroads with communities that Republicans have traditionally struggled to gain traction with.
As Democrats continue to politicize the pandemic and make far-off predictions, President Trump is focused on protecting American lives and livelihoods.


welovetrump--2020-04-24--Biden-Whitmer Would Defeat Trump-Pence in Michigan by 8 Percent, New Fox Poll Shows

Even as Michigan Governor Whitmer ’ s unpopularity grows , she holds considerable sway in her state , according to @ @ @ @ @ .
Democrat Governor Whitmer has been under fire for draconian lockdown policies , which even @ @ @ @ @ fruit and vegetable seeds .
The seeds had been labeled “ non-essential , ” but @ @ @ @ @ were permitted .
Many Michiganders accused Whitmer of “ overreach , ” which led to @ @ @ @ @ Despite her soaring unpopularity , a new Fox News poll suggests that a Biden-Whitmer ticket @ @ @ @ @ by at least 8 percentage points .
President Trump destroyed the fabled Democratic blue wall @ @ @ @ @ as Michigan and Pennsylvania in 2016 .
More details on this new poll below :

Even as Michigan Governor Whitmer’s unpopularity grows, she holds considerable sway in her state, according to a new Fox News poll.
Democrat Governor Whitmer has been under fire for draconian lockdown policies, which even prevented Michigan residents from purchasing fruit and vegetable seeds.
The seeds had been labeled “non-essential,” but lottery tickets and marijuana sales were permitted.
Many Michiganders accused Whitmer of “overreach,” which led to protests across the state.
Despite her soaring unpopularity, a new Fox News poll suggests that a Biden-Whitmer ticket would defeat Trump-Pence in Michigan by at least 8 percentage points.
President Trump destroyed the fabled Democratic blue wall when he won states such as Michigan and Pennsylvania in 2016.
More details on this new poll below:


welovetrump--2020-04-26--Mark Cuban:  Trump Is Right On Infrastructure

And from the Business Insider : In a Sunday night post on his blog , Blog Maverick , Cuban said a `` big chunk '' of the $ 1 trillion Trump proposal should be spent on research and development , software , and design for robots `` and every other facet of the robotics industry . ''
Cuban said that if he were spending the money , he 'd allocate 10 % — or about $ 100 billion — to the effort .
`` Unfortunately , none of the companies that actually make the robotics are based here in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ owner of the NBA 's Dallas Mavericks .
`` That 's a problem that needs to be solved .
We need to help develop domestic companies much like we did the electric-car and wind and solar industries .
Even if it means trying to help pick winners . ''
`` We have to win the robotics race , '' he continued .
`` We are not even close right now . ''
Cuban added that China , South Korea , and European countries are offering billions in credits to support their robotics industries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of that .
`` That ai n't gon na work , '' he wrote .
`` The good news , if there is any , is that according to the report , China is only spending $ 3 billion dollars a year on robotics .
We need to quickly pass them by . ''
`` Why is this so important ? ''
he continued .
`` Because technological change always accelerates .
It never stagnates over time .
Which means we are going to face the fact that if nothing in the States @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on other countries for almost everything that can and will be manufactured in a quickly approaching future . ''
While many Americans voted for Trump in hopes of stunting globalization or stunting the rapidly increasing automation of jobs , Cuban said Americans `` have to face the fact '' that jobs are going to be lost to robotics .
`` The only question that needs to be answered is which country will create and own the best robotic technology and have the infrastructure necessary to enable it , '' he wrote .
`` @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and that needs to change .
Our 'infrastructure ' spending should look forwards , not backwards , so that we can be the robotics hub of the world . ''
Trump 's infrastructure plan calls for $ 550 billion of the $ 1 trillion proposal to be publicly funded , and his push for increased infrastructure spending has been more vocally favored by congressional Democrats rather than Republicans .
Cuban , who was a prominent supporter of Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and a critic of Trump on the campaign trail , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ No .
1 draft pick . ''
`` He 's who we put our hopes and dreams with , and we 're going to believe in him , '' he said .
`` Right now it 's a little bit easier because we have n't played a game yet . ''

Here are more details, from AOL:
Mark Cuban says President Trump is right on the need for infrastructure spending. But the billionaire entrepreneur argues it needs to be "infrastructure 4.0," which would be "looking towards the future rather than trying to recreate the past” as the pace of technology accelerates.
On Tuesday, Trump called for a $2 trillion infrastructure bill to boost the economy reeling from the COVID-19 pandemic.
"With interest rates for the United States being at ZERO, this is the time to do our decades long awaited Infrastructure Bill. It should be VERY Big & Bold, Two Trillion Dollars, and be focused solely on jobs and rebuilding the once great infrastructure of our Country! Phase 4," the president tweeted.
"He's right,” Cuban told Yahoo Finance in an interview on Tuesday. “But, the question is: How do we do it and what do we do? I don't think we can just do it the old school way of just rebuilding roads and bridges. We need to look and say, 'Can we do a complete reset? What do we need to do going forward?’”
Cuban argued that "you can't just bring over manufacturing and expect it to be competitive." However, the first step would be investing in robotics as an example.
"We are not the leader in robotics in the world. So, when we talk about infrastructure, we can talk about building the new factories that incorporate robotics and building software. So then, we can start bringing over those jobs from China and manufacture the critical PPE and other products that we need to have manufactured here. That's part 1."
The second part is to be mindful of climate change and keep emissions low for the future.
"When we talk about rebuilding infrastructure, I think we need to start asking about having self-driving cars-only lanes on roads,” he said. “We need to talk about on highways, how do we make sure self-driving trucks and autonomous vehicles can operate with cross-country carrying and load-carrying?"
Cuban said part of this process will involve getting people comfortable with self-driving cars, especially within cities. He suggested putting bridges over the top of roads like in Las Vegas for pedestrians crossing the street.


welovetrump--2020-04-26--DeBlasio’s “Snitch Line” Shut Down After Being Flooded With Resistance By Patriots

The NY Post had more details : If you see someone failing to practice social distancing , rat them out , Mayor Bill de Blasio urged Saturday as part of a new city effort to corral the coronavirus .
“ We still know there ’ s some people who need to get the message .
And that means sometimes making sure the enforcement is there to educate people and make clear we ’ ve got to have social distancing , ” Hizzoner said in a video posted to Twitter To do that , is “ simple , ” he explained @ @ @ @ @ @ @ person or crowd , set the location on the image , and text it to 311-692 .
“ Sending that photo in is going to help make sure that people are kept apart , and that ’ s going to stop the disease from spreading .
And that ’ s going to save lives , ” he said .
Repeat offenders face fines as high as $ 1,000 — and that could make the ‘ New Squeal ’ plan more dangerous than COVID-19 .
Pitting stranger vs. stranger with such high stakes “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” warned retired NYPD sergeant Joseph Giacalone .
“ Maybe he should be figuring out why he didn ’ t have enough PPEs for cops and EMS workers , ” the ex-sarge said of the mayor .
“ I ’ d rather yell at them , ” said out-of-work waiter Edwin Mendoza .
“ If you take a picture , that could cause a scene … People can hurt you.
” But Chris Colon , 26 , works as a hospital clerk , and felt differently .
“ With the way thing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anybody , ” said Colon .
“ Have you seen how many people died in New York ?
”

The NY Post had more details:
If you see someone failing to practice social distancing, rat them out, Mayor Bill de Blasio urged Saturday as part of a new city effort to corral the coronavirus.
“We still know there’s some people who need to get the message. And that means sometimes making sure the enforcement is there to educate people and make clear we’ve got to have social distancing,” Hizzoner said in a video posted to Twitter
To do that, is “simple,” he explained.
Snap a photo of an offending person or crowd, set the location on the image, and text it to 311-692.
“Action will ensue,” de Blasio vowed.
“Sending that photo in is going to help make sure that people are kept apart, and that’s going to stop the disease from spreading. And that’s going to save lives,” he said.
Repeat offenders face fines as high as $1,000 — and that could make the ‘New Squeal’ plan more dangerous than COVID-19.
Pitting stranger vs. stranger with such high stakes “could result in acts of random violence,” warned retired NYPD sergeant Joseph Giacalone.
“Maybe he should be figuring out why he didn’t have enough PPEs for cops and EMS workers,” the ex-sarge said of the mayor.
“I’d rather yell at them,” said out-of-work waiter Edwin Mendoza. “If you take a picture, that could cause a scene … People can hurt you.”
But Chris Colon, 26, works as a hospital clerk, and felt differently.
“With the way thing are now, I would snitch on anybody,” said Colon. “Have you seen how many people died in New York?”


welovetrump--2020-04-25--Mark Cuban:  “Right Now I’m Supporting The President…I’m All In”

Billionaire Mark Cuban said Wednesday that he is fully committed to helping President Trump reopen the U.S. economy that was attacked by the coronavirus .
`` Right now I 'm supporting the president , '' Cuban told FOX Business ’ Stuart Varney referring to hinting at running for the presidency .
`` I 'm here to help him on his council .
Whatever I can do as an American – I 'm all in . ''
Trump on Tuesday named Cuban as one of the leaders that he would be meeting by telephone to help resurrect the ailing U.S. economy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , photo , a woman walks by local stores during the coronavirus pandemic in New York .
( AP Photo/Mark Lennihan ) ( Associated Press ) While the Dallas Mavericks owner would not discuss plans for a presidential run , he did float some economic ideas that he believes “ conservatives would be very interested ” in hearing .
First , Cuban said he isn ’ t sure whether the Small Business Administration 's Paycheck Protection Program and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan programs are working and there should be a “ friction-free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ I 'd work with the Fed and the Treasury and banks to install an overdraft protection program and that allows small businesses and medium-sized businesses , in particular , to continue business as usual , ” he said .
Cuban also believes investing in robotics would create an “ America 2.0 ” that established the U.S. as the economic leader of the world .
“ I think we have to start talking about robotics taxes , because when we get back to work if we 're really going to bring manufacturing back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recreate the manufacturing of the past where we put everybody in the assembly line and pretend that there 's going to be a lot of manufacturing jobs .
We have to invest as a country in robotics because that 's the way we 're going to be able to bring manufacturing over here and beat the pants off the Chinese at what they do best , which is low-cost manufacturing , ” he said .

Mark Cuban and Donald Trump have a rollercoaster history as “frenemies”.
Some days they seem close, like when Cuban let Trump host a rally in his Mavericks Stadium early in the 2016 presidential campaign.
Those iconic photos still circulate to this day, and it was a big boost for Trump from a fellow friendly billionaire.
But other times have not been so friendly, and Cuban has been quick to share his criticisms of President Trump.
Perhaps it should not be surprising.
These are two absolute Alpha Males.
And they have a lot in common.
Both rich. Both strong willed. Both driven. Both comfortable in front of the camera. Both very outspoken.
So it’s nice to see them teaming up instead of attacking each other.
And the cooperation comes courtesy of President Trump’s invitation….and Cuban’s acceptance.
Take a look:


welovetrump--2020-04-25--Failed Candidate Stacey Abrams Goes After Trump, Claims “He’s Illegitimate”

Has any more attention been paid to a losing candidate than Stacey Abrams ?
She lost a gubernational race by tens of thousands of votes , and yet we have to hear her plastered all over the mainstream media as if she actually were elected the governor of Georgia .
On Thursday , Abrams appeared on a podcast hosted by David Axelrod , a former Obama advisor .
During the show , Abrams remarked that the country must have widespread mail-in voting .
She also claimed that Trump ’ s hesitation towards mail-in voting shows that he ’ s “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he ’ s simply concerned that mail-in voting could increase voter fraud ?
That ’ s been the view that he ’ s relayed to the public and it does make sense that mail-in voting erects new hurdles in maintaining the integrity of elections .
Check out details on the interview from Breitbart : Thursday during an interview with CNN analyst David Axelrod on his podcast “ The Axe Files , ” former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams ( D ) accused President Donald Trump of being “ afraid ” of vote-by-mail because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and show that Trump was “ illegitimate ” and “ should not hold office.
” Abrams said , “ What ’ s happened in the last twenty years has been an acceleration by the right to constrict access to the vote because they no longer believe they can persuade the demographic majority of the country to agree with their ideas .
So let ’ s start with that as a baseline .
What we face with COVID-19 is an exacerbation of but also a concentration of the challenge that we face in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ faced in 2018 , the voters in Ohio and Wisconsin and Florida have continually faced .
And that is an artificial attempt to break the connection between being a citizen and having the right to express your views and choose your leaders.
” She continued , “ We are pushing for in the vote by mail compulsion that we are trying to push up , that we are hearing that we need in the next CARES package is this , vote by mail is one way to ensure that we have safe , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voting in person .
There is no legitimate reason to remove both unless you are a state that has been doing this so long you have solved the issues of mass in-person voting .
So instead , what we have is that we have to imagine a hundred people crowding into a polling place on Election Day were some number of those people may or may or be asymptomatic and where COVID has not gone .
The goal is to get at least 75 percent of those people out of line .
Get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the way to accomplish that is to allow them to vote by mail .
Every state in our nation has the capacity for vote-by-mail .
The issue is making sure it is affordable and that the excuses are lifted , the requirements for excuses are lifted by the states who limit who has access .
Of the remaining 25 % , you want at least 10 of them to vote early because if you can spread out timing , then you can limit the likelihood that they are going to infect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the number of personnel that you need in order to serve them .
So by the time you get to election day , the only people who need to be voting in person are those who have no other choice.
” Fox News reported on Abrams ’ appearance earlier this week on MSNBC , where she discussed the same topic : Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams claimed on Tuesday that voter fraud was mostly a myth and that President Trump was actually afraid of mail-in voting because it would help people participate in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ere ’ s the thing .
Voter fraud is , by and large , a myth .
The president of the United States , number one , voted by mail just recently , and so it worked for him , ” Abrams told MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski .
“ The concern he has is that it will actually work for every American .
Our elections are not partisan .
The choices we make are , but the elections themselves should be available to every eligible American citizen.
” Since losing her gubernatorial bid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against voter suppression – something she blamed for her loss to former Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp .
Trump has repeatedly expressed concerns about voter fraud , including while considering ways to maintain social distancing in elections during the coronavirus pandemic .
Does it make sense that we have to keep hearing the opinion of a failed candidate ?
Clearly , she hasn ’ t accepted her loss , as evidenced by her continued blaming of voter suppression for costing her the governor ’ s seat .
Many on Twitter shared the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a bit overplayed :

Has any more attention been paid to a losing candidate than Stacey Abrams?
She lost a gubernational race by tens of thousands of votes, and yet we have to hear her plastered all over the mainstream media as if she actually were elected the governor of Georgia.
On Thursday, Abrams appeared on a podcast hosted by David Axelrod, a former Obama advisor. During the show, Abrams remarked that the country must have widespread mail-in voting. She also claimed that Trump’s hesitation towards mail-in voting shows that he’s “afraid” and “illegitimate.”
Perhaps he’s simply concerned that mail-in voting could increase voter fraud? That’s been the view that he’s relayed to the public and it does make sense that mail-in voting erects new hurdles in maintaining the integrity of elections.
Check out details on the interview from Breitbart:
Thursday during an interview with CNN analyst David Axelrod on his podcast “The Axe Files,” former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams (D) accused President Donald Trump of being “afraid” of vote-by-mail because she argued it would “increase turnout and show that Trump was “illegitimate” and “should not hold office.” Abrams said, “What’s happened in the last twenty years has been an acceleration by the right to constrict access to the vote because they no longer believe they can persuade the demographic majority of the country to agree with their ideas. So let’s start with that as a baseline. What we face with COVID-19 is an exacerbation of but also a concentration of the challenge that we face in this country the challenge that voters in Georgia faced in 2018, the voters in Ohio and Wisconsin and Florida have continually faced. And that is an artificial attempt to break the connection between being a citizen and having the right to express your views and choose your leaders.” She continued, “We are pushing for in the vote by mail compulsion that we are trying to push up, that we are hearing that we need in the next CARES package is this, vote by mail is one way to ensure that we have safe, accessible voting and it is coupled with voting in person. There is no legitimate reason to remove both unless you are a state that has been doing this so long you have solved the issues of mass in-person voting. So instead, what we have is that we have to imagine a hundred people crowding into a polling place on Election Day were some number of those people may or may or be asymptomatic and where COVID has not gone. The goal is to get at least 75 percent of those people out of line. Get 75% of them out of line, and the way to accomplish that is to allow them to vote by mail. Every state in our nation has the capacity for vote-by-mail. The issue is making sure it is affordable and that the excuses are lifted, the requirements for excuses are lifted by the states who limit who has access. Of the remaining 25%, you want at least 10 of them to vote early because if you can spread out timing, then you can limit the likelihood that they are going to infect one another, and you can limit the number of personnel that you need in order to serve them. So by the time you get to election day, the only people who need to be voting in person are those who have no other choice.”
Fox News reported on Abrams’ appearance earlier this week on MSNBC, where she discussed the same topic:
Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams claimed on Tuesday that voter fraud was mostly a myth and that President Trump was actually afraid of mail-in voting because it would help people participate in the upcoming elections. “[H]ere’s the thing. Voter fraud is, by and large, a myth. The president of the United States, number one, voted by mail just recently, and so it worked for him,” Abrams told MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski. “The concern he has is that it will actually work for every American. Our elections are not partisan. The choices we make are, but the elections themselves should be available to every eligible American citizen.” Since losing her gubernatorial bid in 2018, Abrams has been fighting against voter suppression – something she blamed for her loss to former Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp. Trump has repeatedly expressed concerns about voter fraud, including while considering ways to maintain social distancing in elections during the coronavirus pandemic.
Does it make sense that we have to keep hearing the opinion of a failed candidate? Clearly, she hasn’t accepted her loss, as evidenced by her continued blaming of voter suppression for costing her the governor’s seat.
Many on Twitter shared the sentiment that Abrams’ may be getting a bit overplayed:


welovetrump--2020-04-27--Singer Richard Marx Claims He’d Rather Have Serial Killer Jeffrey Dahmer Over Trump as President

Hereeee we go again !
Another liberal Hollywood celebrity wants to lecture the rest of us about his knowledge on @ @ @ @ @ best .
Singer Richard Marx slammed President Trump , stating “ I ’ d rather @ @ @ @ @ Trump.
” Dahmer is a serial killer and sex offender who committed the murder and @ @ @ @ @ men and boys .
Marx continued to slam Trump , saying that he is “ @ @ @ @ @ ” The attacks come as President Trump attempts to unify the country in the face @ @ @ @ @ Currently , the administration is coordinating with states to safely phase into the opening of @ @ @ @ @ on Marx ’ s outlandish claims below :

Hereeee we go again!
Another liberal Hollywood celebrity wants to lecture the rest of us about his knowledge on politics and how he knows best.
Singer Richard Marx slammed President Trump, stating “I’d rather have Jeffrey Dahmer than Donald Trump.”
Dahmer is a serial killer and sex offender who committed the murder and dismemberment of at least 17 men and boys.
Marx continued to slam Trump, saying that he is “a despicable piece of trash.”
The attacks come as President Trump attempts to unify the country in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Currently, the administration is coordinating with states to safely phase into the opening of the economy.
More details on Marx’s outlandish claims below:


welovetrump--2020-04-27--Supreme Court Eases Path to Deportation for Crimes in Major Victory for Trump

Predictably , rather than reporting on the ruling , many on the left have tried to politicize the Court 's interpretation of the law .
CNN 's headline covering the story reads , `` How the Supreme Court has enabled Trump on immigration . ''
However , what the media failed to report is that the Supreme Court also ruled that serious criminal convictions reached by non-unanimous juries are unconstitutional .
Civil rights activists claim that this will help reduce the number of wrongful convictions , including those that may result in the deportation of immigrants .
CNBC has more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Monday ruled that serious criminal convictions reached by non-unanimous juries are unconstitutional , delivering a win for civil rights advocates who traced the connections between split jury convictions to racist state efforts to minimize the role of black jurors .
Justice Neil Gorsuch , writing for a divided court , said there “ can be no question ” that the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution requires unanimity in state courts .
The court had previously held that the requirement only applied at the federal level .
Gorsuch was joined in part by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Sonia Sotomayor and Brett Kavanaugh .
Justice Clarence Thomas agreed with the judgement but didn ’ t join Gorsuch ’ s opinion .
Justice Samuel Alito dissented , joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and in part by Justice Elena Kagan .
The decision was widely expected and will have limited impact nationwide , as the only two states that have allowed split jury convictions in recent years are Louisiana and Oregon .
Those two states could now face more than a thousand requests for retrials , according to documents they submitted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brought by Evangelisto Ramos , who in 2016 was convicted on a murder charge in Louisiana by a vote of 10-2 from a 12-person jury .
Ramos has maintained he is innocent of the crime .
The case is known as Ramos v. Louisiana , No .
18-5924 .
As Ramos ’ case was working its way through the legal system , a local Louisiana newspaper published an extensive investigation into split juries , finding that they disproportionately harmed black defendants .
Voters in Louisiana outlawed split juries in 2018 , for crimes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Oregon as the only state where it was still possible to face conviction from a divided panel .
Gorsuch pointed to the racist origins of split juries in his opinion striking them down , writing that courts in both states had “ frankly acknowledged ” the history .
“ Why do Louisiana and Oregon allow nonunanimous convictions ?
Though it ’ s hard to say why these laws persist , their origins are clear , ” he wrote .
The Trump appointee cited comments from a committee chairman at the state ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s non-unanimous verdicts were first endorsed , who said the purpose of the convention was to “ establish the supremacy of the white race.
” Oregon ’ s rule , Gorsuch wrote , “ can be similarly traced to the rise of the Ku Klux Klan ” and efforts to dilute the influence of racial , ethnic and religious minorities on Oregon juries .
The court ’ s majority opinion overturned the 1972 case Apodaca v. Oregon , which applied the unanimity requirement to federal juries but not the states .
Apodaca was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exception to its general rule of applying Bill of Rights protections equally at the state and federal level , Ginsburg remarked in an opinion handed down in February .

Predictably, rather than reporting on the ruling, many on the left have tried to politicize the Court's interpretation of the law.
CNN's headline covering the story reads, "How the Supreme Court has enabled Trump on immigration."
However, what the media failed to report is that the Supreme Court also ruled that serious criminal convictions reached by non-unanimous juries are unconstitutional.
In other words, a criminal conviction requires a unanimous jury.
Civil rights activists claim that this will help reduce the number of wrongful convictions, including those that may result in the deportation of immigrants.
CNBC has more on this ruling:
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that serious criminal convictions reached by non-unanimous juries are unconstitutional, delivering a win for civil rights advocates who traced the connections between split jury convictions to racist state efforts to minimize the role of black jurors.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for a divided court, said there “can be no question” that the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution requires unanimity in state courts. The court had previously held that the requirement only applied at the federal level.
Gorsuch was joined in part by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Brett Kavanaugh. Justice Clarence Thomas agreed with the judgement but didn’t join Gorsuch’s opinion. Justice Samuel Alito dissented, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and in part by Justice Elena Kagan.
The decision was widely expected and will have limited impact nationwide, as the only two states that have allowed split jury convictions in recent years are Louisiana and Oregon. Those two states could now face more than a thousand requests for retrials, according to documents they submitted to the justices.
The case was brought by Evangelisto Ramos, who in 2016 was convicted on a murder charge in Louisiana by a vote of 10-2 from a 12-person jury. Ramos has maintained he is innocent of the crime. The case is known as Ramos v. Louisiana, No. 18-5924.
As Ramos’ case was working its way through the legal system, a local Louisiana newspaper published an extensive investigation into split juries, finding that they disproportionately harmed black defendants.
Voters in Louisiana outlawed split juries in 2018, for crimes committed in 2019 and beyond, leaving Oregon as the only state where it was still possible to face conviction from a divided panel.
Gorsuch pointed to the racist origins of split juries in his opinion striking them down, writing that courts in both states had “frankly acknowledged” the history.
“Why do Louisiana and Oregon allow nonunanimous convictions? Though it’s hard to say why these laws persist, their origins are clear,” he wrote.
The Trump appointee cited comments from a committee chairman at the state’s 1898 constitutional convention, where Louisiana’s non-unanimous verdicts were first endorsed, who said the purpose of the convention was to “establish the supremacy of the white race.”
Oregon’s rule, Gorsuch wrote, “can be similarly traced to the rise of the Ku Klux Klan” and efforts to dilute the influence of racial, ethnic and religious minorities on Oregon juries.
The court’s majority opinion overturned the 1972 case Apodaca v. Oregon, which applied the unanimity requirement to federal juries but not the states. Apodaca was the Supreme Court’s last remaining exception to its general rule of applying Bill of Rights protections equally at the state and federal level, Ginsburg remarked in an opinion handed down in February.


welovetrump--2020-04-27--After Failed Impeachment Attempt, Schiff and Nadler Target Barr with Investigation

The Democratics are at it yet again .
Now that they have spectacularly failed to remove President Trump through the @ @ @ @ @ history , they have set their eyes on his trusted and respected Attorney General : @ @ @ @ @ targeting the nation ’ s attorney general , they ’ re attempting to once again @ @ @ @ @ out a duly elected president .
Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler have asked the Justice @ @ @ @ @ to investigate comments that Barr made concerning the firing of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael @ @ @ @ @ are Schiff and Nadler accusing Barr of doing ?
They want the independent monitor to @ @ @ @ @ Barr made about the firing of Atkinson .
That ’ s right : they ’ @ @ @ @ @ about the actual firing of Atkinson , but are attempting to investigate the nature of @ @ @ @ @ More details on the latest politicized investigation below :

The Democratics are at it yet again.
Now that they have spectacularly failed to remove President Trump through the most political impeachment process in history, they have set their eyes on his trusted and respected Attorney General: Bill Barr.
Make no mistake.
Their ultimate goal remains President Trump.
But by targeting the nation’s attorney general, they’re attempting to once again work their way to taking out a duly elected president.
Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler have asked the Justice Department’s independent monitor to investigate comments that Barr made concerning the firing of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson.
So exactly what are Schiff and Nadler accusing Barr of doing?
They want the independent monitor to investigate “misleading” comments Barr made about the firing of Atkinson.
That’s right: they’re not making any accusations about the actual firing of Atkinson, but are attempting to investigate the nature of Barr’s comments.
More details on the latest politicized investigation below:


welovetrump--2020-04-27--Candace Owens Goes Nuclear on AOC: “You’re a racist, radical communist that wants to expand governme

Candace Owens Goes Nuclear on AOC: “You’re a racist, radical communist that wants to expand government control and dependency”

Now that Joe Biden is the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee , Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is once again the face of the @ @ @ @ @ Sanders has lit the torch that yearns from Democratic socialism , then AOC seems poised @ @ @ @ @ But not if Candace Owens has anything to say about it !
The conservative commentator @ @ @ @ @ is running for political office , held nothing back when attacking AOC ’ s radical @ @ @ @ @ a firestorm of tweets , Owens declared : “ You ’ re a racist , @ @ @ @ @ expand government control and dependency.
” This comes after AOC has claimed that the novel @ @ @ @ @ hits black and brown communities the hardest .
See the epic showdown below !

Go get em, Candace!
Now that Joe Biden is the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is once again the face of the radical left-wing.
If Bernie Sanders has lit the torch that yearns from Democratic socialism, then AOC seems poised to bring radicalism to America…
But not if Candace Owens has anything to say about it!
The conservative commentator, who recently announced she is running for political office, held nothing back when attacking AOC’s radical politics on Twitter.
In a firestorm of tweets, Owens declared: “You’re a racist, radical communist that wants to expand government control and dependency.”
This comes after AOC has claimed that the novel coronavirus is racist because it hits black and brown communities the hardest.
See the epic showdown below!


welovetrump--2020-04-26--Death Rumors Swirl Around Kim Jong-un, Online Mockery

And from the website itself , with a time stamp of March 10 , 2018 you can read this from Charlie : We can see by a study of the Bible that God has many ways of communicating with His sons and daughters .
Throughout the scriptures we see various ways in which God relayed detailed information about future events and situations for people and nations , things that He had set in order in the future for the benefit of mankind .
One of His miraculous ways of speaking to us is through the avenue of dreams .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how God speaks through dreams , `` For God speaketh once , yea twice , yet man perceiveth it not .
In a dream , in a vision of the night , when deep sleep falleth upon men , in slumberings upon the bed ; Then he openeth the ears of men , and sealeth their instruction , That he may withdraw man from his purpose , and hide pride from man .
He keepeth back his soul from the pit , and his life from perishing by the sword . ''
( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but it is our job to distinguish His ways of communication especially when it comes to delicate matters involving nations and world leaders .
On March 5 , 2018 , I had one of the most fascinating and in depth dreams about Kim Jong Un and his sister Kim Yo-jong .
In this dream a pristine 1953 white Cadillac Eldorado convertible pulled up in front of my home .
Driving the car was none other then the North Korean dictator , Kim Jong Un .
I walked out of my house to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as though we had known each other for many many years and I was a close family friend .
He came to show me the latest car that he had recently purchased .
I jumped into the passenger seat and we were off cruising through the streets .
While he seemed content to just want to talk about the car and life .
I , on the other hand , was sent to discuss a much more important and delicate matter .
While it was Kim driving the car in the dream I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Unknown to him I had worked out a secret location with the United States government to open up a discussion between Kim and President Donald Trump .
After awhile we finally reached our destination and he placed the car in park .
Again , it seemed as though I had known this man for many years and that we were very close .
I looked at Kim and said , `` I have a most urgent matter I must discuss with you and this is why I have brought you here to this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I had been working diligently with the CIA and the United States for many years relaying information concerning him and his family .
He looked at me in shock as I disclosed many things to him about my dealings with the United States .
I also spoke to him about several different options that the United States government was presently looking at to remove him from power , which I can not discuss in detail publicly in this prophetic word .
I gave him several different options on how to precede in what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with several different nations .
Suddenly , he broke down and began to weep uncontrollably .
We embraced and I began to speak of great change that needed to take place in North Korea if it was to survive .
I told Kim of his destiny and purpose as not a dictator , but a liberator .
That Jesus Christ was calling him to change his nation in one generation , to liberate the nation and break down the walls of separation between the North and South .
We prayed together and he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It was a sight to see , even his face was changed as liberty came !
I reached into my pocket and pulled out my cellphone to make a call to President Donald Trump and the Pentagon , but my phone would not work .
I tried several times to make the call , but they all failed .
I even tried to take a picture of Kim and I together and send a text , but it would not go through .
The dream fades to another scene and I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Suddenly the scenario plays out again only this time it is Kim Yo-jong , his sister driving the car .
The dream plays out again exactly the same with his sister and ending with me attempting to make connection with the United States government only to fail to make the call because of the cellphone .
In the dream I found both him and his sister to be broken and wanting change for North Korea .
It felt as though they were weary and hoped for a new day for the nation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coming from North Korea that none of us could have expected , but we must pray !
Since this was a dream there were a few symbols that I feel were significant that I want to discuss in an attempt to draw out information for us to pray into over the next several months .
We understand that there are layers within dreams , as well as there are three distinct pieces to anything God says .
First , there is the initial revelation then there is the interpretation and finally there is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in deciphering anything that God is saying .
There are mainly two points of interest that I want to key in on .
First , the automobile that was driven by both Kim and his sister , the pristine 1953 white Cadillac Eldorado convertible , I believe is something significant .
El Dorado is Spanish for “ the golden one ” , which would describe the position that Both Kim and his sister have been placed in as leaders of the nation .
I believe overall the car represented the Nation of North @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a decision making style that is focused on appearing impressive to others .
This would make sense in the case of North Korea because they are always presenting the nation to others as a powerful force in the world .
They have made a decision to deceive others into believing they have power when in fact the dynasty is very broken .
They are at a crossroads and a decision must be made .
I believe the Convertible represents a change and conversion that can take place both with Kim , his sister @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I believe it speaks to converts to Christianity and a possible open heaven coming over the nation of North Korea , this is God ’ s greatest desire !
The color white and year of the car also is significant in that 1953 was the year of the cease fire and seemingly the end of the Korean war .
I believe the Lord is wanting to wash away the pain of that war and bring a pure discussion of reunification of the North and South .
Finally my greatest concern was this issue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me deeply that the enemy would love to bring a miscommunication and cut communications between North Korea and America before a true discussion can be brought forth .
I can even see hindrances being connected to the media and how they tend to twist things .
I believe we are at a critical time in human history and we desperately need to pray this situation through to victory .
We need to pray for the conversion of Kim and his sister to the Lord , as well as , pray all forms of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s will can come to pass for this nation .
It is my deepest desire to see transformation for Korea .
Please let us stay focused and pray through this dream and all that the Lord is speaking at this time .

And from the website itself, with a time stamp of March 10, 2018 you can read this from Charlie:
We can see by a study of the Bible that God has many ways of communicating with His sons and daughters. Throughout the scriptures we see various ways in which God relayed detailed information about future events and situations for people and nations, things that He had set in order in the future for the benefit of mankind. One of His miraculous ways of speaking to us is through the avenue of dreams. The book of Job chapter thirty three describes how God speaks through dreams, "For God speaketh once, yea twice, yet man perceiveth it not. In a dream, in a vision of the night, when deep sleep falleth upon men, in slumberings upon the bed; Then he openeth the ears of men, and sealeth their instruction, That he may withdraw man from his purpose, and hide pride from man. He keepeth back his soul from the pit, and his life from perishing by the sword." (Job 33:14-18)
God is always speaking, but it is our job to distinguish His ways of communication especially when it comes to delicate matters involving nations and world leaders.
On March 5, 2018, I had one of the most fascinating and in depth dreams about Kim Jong Un and his sister Kim Yo-jong. In this dream a pristine 1953 white Cadillac Eldorado convertible pulled up in front of my home. Driving the car was none other then the North Korean dictator, Kim Jong Un. I walked out of my house to meet and greet him, it felt as though we had known each other for many many years and I was a close family friend. He came to show me the latest car that he had recently purchased. I jumped into the passenger seat and we were off cruising through the streets. While he seemed content to just want to talk about the car and life. I, on the other hand, was sent to discuss a much more important and delicate matter. While it was Kim driving the car in the dream I was directing him where to go. Unknown to him I had worked out a secret location with the United States government to open up a discussion between Kim and President Donald Trump. After awhile we finally reached our destination and he placed the car in park. Again, it seemed as though I had known this man for many years and that we were very close. I looked at Kim and said, "I have a most urgent matter I must discuss with you and this is why I have brought you here to this place." I told him that I had been working diligently with the CIA and the United States for many years relaying information concerning him and his family. He looked at me in shock as I disclosed many things to him about my dealings with the United States. I also spoke to him about several different options that the United States government was presently looking at to remove him from power, which I can not discuss in detail publicly in this prophetic word. I gave him several different options on how to precede in what was about to be a long negotiation with several different nations. Suddenly, he broke down and began to weep uncontrollably. We embraced and I began to speak of great change that needed to take place in North Korea if it was to survive. I told Kim of his destiny and purpose as not a dictator, but a liberator. That Jesus Christ was calling him to change his nation in one generation, to liberate the nation and break down the walls of separation between the North and South. We prayed together and he accepted the Lord as his personal Savior. It was a sight to see, even his face was changed as liberty came! I reached into my pocket and pulled out my cellphone to make a call to President Donald Trump and the Pentagon, but my phone would not work. I tried several times to make the call, but they all failed. I even tried to take a picture of Kim and I together and send a text, but it would not go through.
The dream fades to another scene and I’m once again back at my house. Suddenly the scenario plays out again only this time it is Kim Yo-jong, his sister driving the car. The dream plays out again exactly the same with his sister and ending with me attempting to make connection with the United States government only to fail to make the call because of the cellphone. In the dream I found both him and his sister to be broken and wanting change for North Korea. It felt as though they were weary and hoped for a new day for the nation. I truly believe something shocking is coming from North Korea that none of us could have expected, but we must pray!
Since this was a dream there were a few symbols that I feel were significant that I want to discuss in an attempt to draw out information for us to pray into over the next several months. We understand that there are layers within dreams, as well as there are three distinct pieces to anything God says. First, there is the initial revelation then there is the interpretation and finally there is the application. These three are essential in deciphering anything that God is saying. There are mainly two points of interest that I want to key in on.
First, the automobile that was driven by both Kim and his sister, the pristine 1953 white Cadillac Eldorado convertible, I believe is something significant. El Dorado is Spanish for “the golden one”, which would describe the position that Both Kim and his sister have been placed in as leaders of the nation. I believe overall the car represented the Nation of North Korea. Cadillacs often represent in dreams a decision making style that is focused on appearing impressive to others. This would make sense in the case of North Korea because they are always presenting the nation to others as a powerful force in the world. They have made a decision to deceive others into believing they have power when in fact the dynasty is very broken. They are at a crossroads and a decision must be made.
I believe the Convertible represents a change and conversion that can take place both with Kim, his sister and the nation as a whole. I believe it speaks to converts to Christianity and a possible open heaven coming over the nation of North Korea, this is God’s greatest desire! The color white and year of the car also is significant in that 1953 was the year of the cease fire and seemingly the end of the Korean war. I believe the Lord is wanting to wash away the pain of that war and bring a pure discussion of reunification of the North and South.
Finally my greatest concern was this issue with the cellphone. It spoke to me deeply that the enemy would love to bring a miscommunication and cut communications between North Korea and America before a true discussion can be brought forth. I can even see hindrances being connected to the media and how they tend to twist things. I believe we are at a critical time in human history and we desperately need to pray this situation through to victory. We need to pray for the conversion of Kim and his sister to the Lord, as well as, pray all forms of communication stay open so that God’s will can come to pass for this nation. It is my deepest desire to see transformation for Korea. Please let us stay focused and pray through this dream and all that the Lord is speaking at this time.
-Prophet Charlie Shamp


welovetrump--2020-04-26--Death Rumors Swirl Around Kim Jong-un; Prophetic Update


welovetrump--2020-04-26--Trump Right Again?  Colorado Company Already Exploring UV Light Treatments “Inside The Body”

Imagine that….President Trump was right again ?
It looks like it .
The Crooked Media has run wild with stories @ @ @ @ @ should injest bleach to kill the virus .
Actually , that ’ s not at @ @ @ @ @ He actually said something pretty intelligent….and as usual , it was just far enough above @ @ @ @ @ that they mocked him for it rather than trying to understand what he was saying @ @ @ @ @ President Trump commented how he was interested in the fact that sunlight kills the virus @ @ @ @ @ like bleach and lysol .
And he asked his medical panel if they knew of @ @ @ @ @ ideas medically .
And the Media took it and ran with it , mocking him @ @ @ @ @ days .
Except….I guess no one knew about this .
Thank you to a real @ @ @ @ @ for making THIS report on a Colorado company already exploring exactly what President Trump asked @ @

Imagine that….President Trump was right again?
It looks like it.
The Crooked Media has run wild with stories saying President Trump thinks you should injest bleach to kill the virus.
Actually, that’s not at all what he said.
He actually said something pretty intelligent….and as usual, it was just far enough above the intellect of the reporters that they mocked him for it rather than trying to understand what he was saying.
At a presser, President Trump commented how he was interested in the fact that sunlight kills the virus quickly, as do things like bleach and lysol.
And he asked his medical panel if they knew of any way to explore these ideas medically.
They didn’t.
And the Media took it and ran with it, mocking him mercilessly for the past several days.
Except….I guess no one knew about this.
Thank you to a real reporter, John Roberts, for making THIS report on a Colorado company already exploring exactly what President Trump asked about.
Take a look:


welovetrump--2020-04-27--NYC Mayor Bill DeBlasio’s Wife “Can’t Account For” $850 MILLION of Taxpayer Money

The NY Post reports that among multiple failed programs and `` bad accounting '' , the figure is actually not $ 850 million but rather $ 1.8 BILLION !
Well , Bill de Blasio for sure .
But also mayoral spouse Chirlane McCray , who has just been revealed as a world-class boondoggler in her own right .
Hey , the family that preys together stays together , right ?
And it ’ s only ( your ) money — even if it is quite a lot of it .
McCray is the proprietress of ThriveNYC , a mental-health-related something-or-other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ little heft to the conceit that Bill and Chirlane were elected as co-mayors — which is nonsense on stilts .
That is , once upon a time , first spouses were content to pretend to be in charge of prettifying highways and things .
It was honorable “ work , ” it didn ’ t cost very much and it filled up the spouse ’ s free time .
But this is 2019 , and the general feeling — at least in the de Blasio administration — is that if there ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the spousal sinecure , it doesn ’ t really matter enough .
So , ipso presto , co-Mayor Bill coughed up enough cash to break a pack mule ’ s back and sent it off to co-Mayor Chirlane — who then went forth to cure Gotham ’ s mental-illness problems .
Fast-forward to Wednesday , when the City Council was startled to discover that McCray and Team Thrive are closing in on having spent an eye-popping $ 900 million since the program ’ s inception — and nobody seems to have a clue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appears to have kept receipts ; the subways and street corners are still overrun with crazy people , and nobody in charge knows what ’ s to happen next .
But let ’ s be clear : If your boondogglery sets the New York City Council back on its heels , you truly are soaring with the eagles .
Right up there with co-Mayor Bill , who started the week on his own sour note — announcing that his signature Renewal school program was closing up shop after pounding $ 773 million down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t actually say “ rathole , ” and the price tag has doubtless been lowballed — but he also had no credible explanation for the debacle , nor did he apologize for it .
“ We did not say everything would be perfect , ” burbled the co-mayor — as if anybody outside his immediate orbit expected an outcome even close to competent .
That ’ s because there never was any doubt what the program was about .
That is , reversing Bloomberg administration plans to shut down 100 miserably malfunctioning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ barely competent teachers and administrators and shutting up small bands of noisy parents who loved the schools despite their failings .
Think Stockholm syndrome , rolled into a big ball with the United Federation of Teachers .
But the co-mayor made performance promises when he initiated the Renewal program , few of which even remotely were met , and presently gravity prevailed : The program caved in on itself .
How many other big-bucks initiatives are in similar straits is unknowable — mostly because bureaucrats never blow the whistle on themselves and also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ city Comptroller Scott Stringer , is among the most incurious individuals ever to hold the office .
That the co-mayors could fly under the radar to burn through $ 1.6 billion to no obvious good effect is an embarrassment — but understandable in the abstract .
Things happen .
That Stringer could sleep through it all is the real scandal ; why does the city even have a comptroller , if that ’ s the standard of performance ?
It is not , in the end , just about money .
The programs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ particularly challenged people — the helpless , often homeless , mentally ill and small children whose futures are forfeited because they landed in shamefully nonfunctional schools , an experience from which they will never recover .
But there are other mysteries out there , too .
Does anybody know how well — more likely , how poorly — the co-mayors ’ hugely expensive pre-K program is working , especially that portion consigned to the city ’ s notoriously problematic not-for-profit sector ?
How about the Hurricane Sandy recovery effort — six years , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Has anybody even looked ?

The NY Post reports that among multiple failed programs and "bad accounting", the figure is actually not $850 million but rather $1.8 BILLION!
Who’s got a billion to burn?
Well, Bill de Blasio for sure.
But also mayoral spouse Chirlane McCray, who has just been revealed as a world-class boondoggler in her own right.
Hey, the family that preys together stays together, right? And it’s only (your) money — even if it is quite a lot of it.
McCray is the proprietress of ThriveNYC, a mental-health-related something-or-other created four-plus years ago to give a little heft to the conceit that Bill and Chirlane were elected as co-mayors — which is nonsense on stilts.
That is, once upon a time, first spouses were content to pretend to be in charge of prettifying highways and things. It was honorable “work,” it didn’t cost very much and it filled up the spouse’s free time.
But this is 2019, and the general feeling — at least in the de Blasio administration — is that if there’s not a lot of dough attached to the spousal sinecure, it doesn’t really matter enough.
So, ipso presto, co-Mayor Bill coughed up enough cash to break a pack mule’s back and sent it off to co-Mayor Chirlane — who then went forth to cure Gotham’s mental-illness problems.
Fast-forward to Wednesday, when the City Council was startled to discover that McCray and Team Thrive are closing in on having spent an eye-popping $900 million since the program’s inception — and nobody seems to have a clue on what.
That is, nobody appears to have kept receipts; the subways and street corners are still overrun with crazy people, and nobody in charge knows what’s to happen next.
But let’s be clear: If your boondogglery sets the New York City Council back on its heels, you truly are soaring with the eagles.
Right up there with co-Mayor Bill, who started the week on his own sour note — announcing that his signature Renewal school program was closing up shop after pounding $773 million down a rathole.
Well, he didn’t actually say “rathole,” and the price tag has doubtless been lowballed — but he also had no credible explanation for the debacle, nor did he apologize for it.
“We did not say everything would be perfect,” burbled the co-mayor — as if anybody outside his immediate orbit expected an outcome even close to competent.
That’s because there never was any doubt what the program was about. That is, reversing Bloomberg administration plans to shut down 100 miserably malfunctioning schools, thus saving the jobs of barely competent teachers and administrators and shutting up small bands of noisy parents who loved the schools despite their failings. Think Stockholm syndrome, rolled into a big ball with the United Federation of Teachers.
But the co-mayor made performance promises when he initiated the Renewal program, few of which even remotely were met, and presently gravity prevailed: The program caved in on itself.
How many other big-bucks initiatives are in similar straits is unknowable — mostly because bureaucrats never blow the whistle on themselves and also because Gotham’s formal watchdog, city Comptroller Scott Stringer, is among the most incurious individuals ever to hold the office.
That the co-mayors could fly under the radar to burn through $1.6 billion to no obvious good effect is an embarrassment — but understandable in the abstract. Things happen.
That Stringer could sleep through it all is the real scandal; why does the city even have a comptroller, if that’s the standard of performance?
It is not, in the end, just about money. The programs at issue ostensibly are meant to assist particularly challenged people — the helpless, often homeless, mentally ill and small children whose futures are forfeited because they landed in shamefully nonfunctional schools, an experience from which they will never recover.
But there are other mysteries out there, too. Does anybody know how well — more likely, how poorly — the co-mayors’ hugely expensive pre-K program is working, especially that portion consigned to the city’s notoriously problematic not-for-profit sector?
How about the Hurricane Sandy recovery effort — six years, uncountable delays and billions of dollars later?
Has anybody even looked?


welovetrump--2020-04-28--Michigan Governor Allegedly Sent Rude Text Messages to Democrat Representative Who Praised Trump for

Michigan Governor Allegedly Sent Rude Text Messages to Democrat Representative Who Praised Trump for Drug

Democrats are some of the most petty people you will ever meet .
Karen Whitsett , a Democrat state representative from Michigan , contracted COVID and fought for her life last month .
Her doctor administered the drug , hydroxychloroquine , after her condition worsened .
Whitsett later praised President Trump for bringing up the drug during his press conferences , saying that he saved her life by doing so .
What did Michigan Democrats do in return ?
They certainly didn ’ t congratulate Whitsett for defeating COVID .
Instead , they unanimously voted to censure her .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to give the President credit and then later meet with him .
While Michigan Democrats certainly don ’ t wish Whitsett any ill will , it ’ s almost as if they wish she had succumbed to COVID .
The Detroit News reports on the vote to censure Whitsett : Detroit Democrats unanimously passed a resolution Saturday to censure a Democratic lawmaker who credited President Donald Trump with advocating for the drug that she said cured her of COVID-19 .
State Rep. Karen Whitsett , D-Detroit , broke protocol by meeting with President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during an April 14 meeting of COVID-19 survivors , where she credited hydroxychloroquine for saving her life , a Democratic district leader said .
“ Thank you for everything that you have done , ” Whitsett told Trump at the meeting .
“ I did not know that saying thank you had a political line .
… I ’ m telling my story and my truth , and this how I feel and these are my words.
” Whitsett ’ s comments landed her in hot water with the 13th Congressional District Democratic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 15-delegate vote via Zoom Saturday ousting the first-term lawmaker representing the 9th Michigan House District .
“ We have the ability to be the referee when we see our leaders out there attacking and not being willing to have a discussion to find common ground , ” said Jonathan Kinloch , chairman of the organization .
“ Based on her actions and recent statements , she ’ s chosen to be a stand-alone Democrat with the goals of a Republican.
” The resolution states Whitsett has “ misrepresented the needs and priorities ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public .
The resolution also notes she ’ s participated in events with the Republican Women ’ s Federation of Michigan to express gratitude to the president .
Whitsett , the resolution said , “ has repeatedly and publicly praised the president ’ s delayed and misguided COVID-19 response efforts in contradiction with the scientifically based and action-oriented response ” from Michigan ’ s Democratic leadership , “ endangering the health , safety and welfare of her constituents , the city of Detroit and the state of Michigan.
” The admonition means she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ endorsement for this year nor will she be able to engage in the group ’ s activities for the next two election cycles .
Whitsett received an outpouring of support on Twitter , with many criticizing the Democrats for their actions :

Democrats are some of the most petty people you will ever meet.
Karen Whitsett, a Democrat state representative from Michigan, contracted COVID and fought for her life last month. Her doctor administered the drug, hydroxychloroquine, after her condition worsened. Whitsett later praised President Trump for bringing up the drug during his press conferences, saying that he saved her life by doing so.
What did Michigan Democrats do in return? They certainly didn’t congratulate Whitsett for defeating COVID. Instead, they unanimously voted to censure her.
They censured her because she had the audacity to give the President credit and then later meet with him.
While Michigan Democrats certainly don’t wish Whitsett any ill will, it’s almost as if they wish she had succumbed to COVID.
The Detroit News reports on the vote to censure Whitsett:
Detroit Democrats unanimously passed a resolution Saturday to censure a Democratic lawmaker who credited President Donald Trump with advocating for the drug that she said cured her of COVID-19. State Rep. Karen Whitsett, D-Detroit, broke protocol by meeting with President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence during an April 14 meeting of COVID-19 survivors, where she credited hydroxychloroquine for saving her life, a Democratic district leader said. “Thank you for everything that you have done,” Whitsett told Trump at the meeting. “I did not know that saying thank you had a political line. … I’m telling my story and my truth, and this how I feel and these are my words.” Whitsett’s comments landed her in hot water with the 13th Congressional District Democratic Party organization, which unanimously passed the 15-delegate vote via Zoom Saturday ousting the first-term lawmaker representing the 9th Michigan House District. “We have the ability to be the referee when we see our leaders out there attacking and not being willing to have a discussion to find common ground,” said Jonathan Kinloch, chairman of the organization. “Based on her actions and recent statements, she’s chosen to be a stand-alone Democrat with the goals of a Republican.” The resolution states Whitsett has “misrepresented the needs and priorities” of Democratic leadership to the president and public. The resolution also notes she’s participated in events with the Republican Women’s Federation of Michigan to express gratitude to the president. Whitsett, the resolution said, “has repeatedly and publicly praised the president’s delayed and misguided COVID-19 response efforts in contradiction with the scientifically based and action-oriented response” from Michigan’s Democratic leadership, “endangering the health, safety and welfare of her constituents, the city of Detroit and the state of Michigan.” The admonition means she will not get the group’s endorsement for this year nor will she be able to engage in the group’s activities for the next two election cycles.
Whitsett received an outpouring of support on Twitter, with many criticizing the Democrats for their actions:


welovetrump--2020-04-27--Could Michael Flynn Be Exonerated This Week? Explosive Report Suggests Mueller’s Case Will Implode,

Could Michael Flynn Be Exonerated This Week? Explosive Report Suggests Mueller’s Case Will Implode, Was “Set Up” by FBI

This week could be a milestone week for retired Lt. General Michael Flynn .
Reports have surfaced indicating that there @ @ @ @ @ on Michael Flynn that could potentially allow the charges against him to be dropped !
@ @ @ @ @ new court documents , which have officially been handed over to Flynn ’ s lawyer @ @ @ @ @ to sue his persecurtors !
It is now beyond dispute that Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn @ @ @ @ @ , it appears that top FBI officials and prosecutors may have .
Evidence was concealed @ @ @ @ @ is unconscionable behavior .
While the mainstream media focuses on all things related to the @ @ @ @ @ are going on the record to state that Michael Flynn will be “ completely exonerated @ @ @ @ @ also call into question the voluntariness of Flynn ’ s “ guilty ” plea , @ @ @ @ @ or coerced into it .
More news on how Robert Mueller ’ s case against @ @ @ @ @

This week could be a milestone week for retired Lt. General Michael Flynn.
Reports have surfaced indicating that there is new, never-before-seen evidence on Michael Flynn that could potentially allow the charges against him to be dropped!
Gregg Jarrett says that these new court documents, which have officially been handed over to Flynn’s lawyer, should also allow him to sue his persecurtors!
In a piece for Fox News, Jarrett writes:
It is now beyond dispute that Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn committed no crimes. But, it appears that top FBI officials and prosecutors may have. Evidence was concealed and justice obstructed. This is unconscionable behavior.
While the mainstream media focuses on all things related to the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple sources are going on the record to state that Michael Flynn will be “completely exonerated this week.”
New facts also call into question the voluntariness of Flynn’s “guilty” plea, or if he was pressured or coerced into it.
More news on how Robert Mueller’s case against Flynn may potentially implode: