welovetrump--2020-12-12--Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò Brings Powerful Prayer At Jericho March!  “The Walls Will Come Down!”

I ’ m not a fan of the Luciferian currently heading the Catholic Church ( you know who I ’ m talking about ) but there are some good people high up in the ranks .
One of those is Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò who brought the message and a powerful prayer today at the Jericho March in D.C .
This is so good .
I am with you at this historic moment for the future of the United States of America and the whole world .
The forces of Evil have gathered in a coalition against God , against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Country , against the family , against order and law , against the values for which our forefathers fought and gave their lives .
Against all mankind , in order to subjugate it to its infernal tyranny .
As Christians , we are citizens of the heavenly Jerusalem ; as Americans , you are citizens – under God – of this great Nation .
Be proud to courageously defend , as true patriots , the values that have made America great and which form the basis of your country ’ s freedom and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children of darkness have sought to subvert the outcome of the presidential elections , through such deception and fraud as to suggest a real attack on the very foundations of human social coexistence .
As lawyers and magistrates investigate the abuses and crimes committed , let us turn to the Lord , the Supreme Judge , through the intercession of Mary Most Holy , our powerful Advocate .
This is the “ Supreme Court ” to which we can and must appeal , that the Will of God may be fulfilled , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more below on the Jericho March .
The walls must come down .
Kind of reminds me of this : You can try to prop him up all you want , but he will topple !
You know what else made the walls fall ?
When God told the Israelites to walk around Jericho 7 times and then shout loudly after the 7th trip .
Not a great military strategy , you wouldn ’ t think .
Except the walls fell into a heap of rubble .
Patriots today took to the streets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are calling very appropriately “ Jericho Marches ” .
Now do you get it ?
And do you notice that we ’ re not burning anything or rioting or looting ?
A series of “ Jericho Marches ” is set to take place around the country at contested state capitols on Saturday with the main event being held in Washington , DC , at locations including the U.S. Capitol , the Supreme Court , and the Department of Justice .
Those who take part in the marches are being asked to select one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group to pray and walk around ” by 9:00 a.m. At 10:00 a.m. , Alice Butler-Short of Virginia Women for Trump , Jo Reitkopp of California Women for Trump , and others will host the “ One Nation Under God ” Grassroots Rally at the Supreme Court , which includes an appearance from Lt. General Michael Flynn , who received a pardon from President Donald Trump late last month .
Following the event held at the Supreme Court with Flynn , from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. , the “ Let the Church @ @ @ @ @ @ @ held on the National Mall .
According to reports , the event will welcome national faith leaders , political leaders , and praise and worship musicians .
Flynn is also set to speak at this event , which includes appearances from My Pillow founder and CEO Mike Lindell , pro-life activist Abby Johnson , talk show host Dennis Prager , Congressman Paul Gosar ( R-AZ ) , Ali Alexander , and others .
According to the rally ’ s website , “ ROAR !
” Prayer Rallies and Jericho Marches will begin at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Pennsylvania , Michigan , Wisconsin , Nevada , and Arizona .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
14,180 views
I’m not a fan of the Luciferian currently heading the Catholic Church (you know who I’m talking about) but there are some good people high up in the ranks.
One of those is Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò who brought the message and a powerful prayer today at the Jericho March in D.C.
This is so good.
Take a look:
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò is bringing the message learned from the original #JerichoMarch and how God brings walls down when His people act in obedience, graciously saving even nations. America, let's turn back to this gracious God!
And he leads a prayer for America! pic.twitter.com/kYuwPswzTz — Ed Martin 🦅 (@EagleEdMartin) December 12, 2020
From the Catholic Family News:
Dear brothers and sisters in Christ,
I am with you at this historic moment for the future of the United States of America and the whole world. The forces of Evil have gathered in a coalition against God, against our Christian Civilization, against our beloved Country, against the family, against order and law, against the values for which our forefathers fought and gave their lives. Against all mankind, in order to subjugate it to its infernal tyranny. As Christians, we are citizens of the heavenly Jerusalem; as Americans, you are citizens – under God – of this great Nation. Be proud to courageously defend, as true patriots, the values that have made America great and which form the basis of your country’s freedom and peace, harmony and prosperity. The children of darkness have sought to subvert the outcome of the presidential elections, through such deception and fraud as to suggest a real attack on the very foundations of human social coexistence. As lawyers and magistrates investigate the abuses and crimes committed, let us turn to the Lord, the Supreme Judge, through the intercession of Mary Most Holy, our powerful Advocate. This is the “Supreme Court” to which we can and must appeal, that the Will of God may be fulfilled, and Truth may triumph over falsehood. + Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop
More here:
And more below on the Jericho March.
This was a powerful movement today!
The walls must fall.
The walls must come down.
Kind of reminds me of this:
You can try to prop him up all you want, but he will topple!
You know what else made the walls fall?
When God told the Israelites to walk around Jericho 7 times and then shout loudly after the 7th trip.
Not a great military strategy, you wouldn’t think.
Except the walls fell into a heap of rubble.
Patriots today took to the streets in Washington D.C. for marches which they are calling very appropriately “Jericho Marches”.
Now do you get it?
And do you notice that we’re not burning anything or rioting or looting?
Imagine that.
Take a look:
Trump supporters march to US Supreme court https://t.co/uQ1KCH4BIM — Jenn Pellegrino OAN 🇺🇸 (@JennPellegrino) December 12, 2020
#JerichoMarch & #StopTheSteal stage being set up on the National Mall.
See you tomorrow! pic.twitter.com/7HWu7ZN32t — Brick Suit (@Brick_Suit) December 11, 2020
The #JerichoMarch and #StopTheSteal prayer rally TODAY at the National Mall. President Trump is noticing! https://t.co/4QTHOLcnmo — TheSteal.com 🟧🛑 (@TheStealMovie) December 12, 2020
https://twitter.com/USAPerfectUnion/status/1337818072535674884
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò is bringing the message learned from the original #JerichoMarch and how God brings walls down when His people act in obedience, graciously saving even nations. America, let's turn back to this gracious God!
And he leads a prayer for America! pic.twitter.com/kYuwPswzTz — Ed Martin 🦅 (@EagleEdMartin) December 12, 2020
Brietbart had more details:


welovetrump--2020-12-12--Trump Patriots March On Supreme Court in “Jericho Marches”….Goliath Must Fall


welovetrump--2020-12-12--Is It Time To Declare The Insurrection Act and Martial Law?  Here’s What That Means…

Ok folks , this is a very special article .
A few days ago I ran a poll asking if you think President Trump should declare the Insurrection Act and implement Martial Law to save the election and the country .
I bet you may have heard those terms before .
But do you know what they mean ?
I ’ m about to tell you .
But first , here was the poll : NATIONAL POLL : Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now ?
Thousands of you voted and here are the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than that , I received HUNDREDS of emails asking “ what is the Insurrection Act ?
” And what Martial Law really means .
There is a ton of confusion out there about those topics and since I can ’ t reply to every email when there are literally hundreds , I wrote this article .
I was researching and trying to find the best way to explain it to you and then I came across this solid gold .
This is a thread from Q that explains exactly what all of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only way out .
It ’ s so good you ’ re probably going to want to bookmark this article and show your family and friends .
The formatting is a little hard to follow but trust me , just tread through it in order and it will ALL make sense .
14\ The Trump legal team , along with Sidney Powell and the white hats all know that these legal issues will end up in front of SCOTUS .
They are using this time now in the lower courts to build their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much of it as they can ) far and wide .
22\ So what does this mean for we Patriots right now ?
Do we sit back and do nothing ?
No .
We stand and we fight !
We continue protesting and shouting and calling our reps to support each other .
We share the truth of the evidence far and wide .
We push back against the MSM narrative .
You can read the full thread here .
And if you ’ re more of a visual learner , you can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all down here : NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Have Trump 's Back 100 % ?
Before you go , please vote in my poll now that you know what it means !
NATIONAL POLL : Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
77,814 views
Ok folks, this is a very special article.
A few days ago I ran a poll asking if you think President Trump should declare the Insurrection Act and implement Martial Law to save the election and the country.
I bet you may have heard those terms before.
But do you know what they mean?
I’m about to tell you.
But first, here was the poll:
NATIONAL POLL: Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now?
Thousands of you voted and here are the results (wow!):
But more than that, I received HUNDREDS of emails asking “what is the Insurrection Act?”
And what Martial Law really means.
There is a ton of confusion out there about those topics and since I can’t reply to every email when there are literally hundreds, I wrote this article.
I was researching and trying to find the best way to explain it to you and then I came across this solid gold.
This is a thread from Q that explains exactly what all of this means and why this is the only way out.
It’s so good you’re probably going to want to bookmark this article and show your family and friends.
The formatting is a little hard to follow but trust me, just tread through it in order and it will ALL make sense.
Enjoy:
1\ As we’ve been watching the hearings on election fraud in these contested states, I keep thinking about the phrase “The military is the only way.” There are several related drops, but D36 stands out to me. Everything is so corrupt, there is no other way than the military.
2\ If the military is the only way, tho, why bother with lawsuits and fights with the MSM? Why not just invoke the Insurrection Act and take down these traitors? Because the people won’t accept it. They must first see it for themselves.
3\ Before Nov 3rd, most people still believed the elections were mostly fair and honest. Minor attempts at fraud existed, sure, but nothing like widespread national vote rigging. That fairytale has since been thoroughly and completely shattered these last several weeks.
4\ This mass blackpilling of people concerning our elections reminds me of another drop we saw a lot of during the riots and violence just a couple short months ago: D4461. Did you think “you must show them” was only about the riots?
5\ We all had to be shown just how thoroughly corrupt our elections had become and just how deep that corruption had spread. We all know there is corruption in D.C., but we also had to see the corruption at the state and local levels too. Even Republicans were in on it.
6\ Evidence was collected and lawsuits were filed, only for us to run into yet another level of corruption: the courts. Anons already know the level of corruption in these courts with activist judges running cover for the [DS]. But most others still needed to see it.
7\ We’ve seen flagrantly asinine rulings from these judges, and obviously biased refusals to even consider the evidence in some cases. Here and there a normal judge appears, but they are almost always overruled by corrupted higher courts.
8\ All along this time, we’ve also been witnessing yet another level of corruption in the mainstream media (MSM). The full on suppression and refusal to cover any of these lawsuits fairly and accurately to keep the info from the people is criminal. Even Fox News has thrown in.
9\ And joining their more traditional MSM brethren, are the Big Tech tyrants, who happily label anything speaking honestly and factually as ‘disputed’. They’re also quite happy in outright suspending or banning accounts that get a little too close to the truth.
10\ In an effort to combat these corrupt and fraudulent acts, we reach out to our corrupted DOJ and FBI for assistance in restraining these bad actors, and are responded to with silence. It’s as if these agencies are also in on the fraud and do not want to get involved.
11\ Every step of the way, we are met with fierce opposition and resistance. Integrity has no bearing and truth does not matter. We are like Sisyphus, forever pushing the same infinitely heavy boulder up the same insurmountable hill.
12\ We hold hearings with republican reps and senators from state legislatures presenting the evidence we’ve collected of widespread fraud. Afterward, they’re fully engaged, but there’s only so many of them and the remaining legislature doesn’t want the fight.
13\ Unfortunately, the state legislatures will most likely fail at their attempts to reclaim the electoral power. But this is known and expected. Why pursue it then, along with these hearings? Because WTP and these legislatures need to know the truth being kept from them.
14\ The Trump legal team, along with Sidney Powell and the white hats all know that these legal issues will end up in front of SCOTUS. They are using this time now in the lower courts to build their cases and spread the information (as much of it as they can) far and wide.
15\ The MAGA legal team needs to have the people and the state legislatures on board when the real hammer drops after SCOTUS rules in favor of Trump. Do you think Soros, et al. and the [DS] will simply accept a SCOTUS ruling that awards Trump his rightfully earned second term?
16\ The [DS] and the Soros bunch, along with the MSM, will cry bloody murder when the SCOTUS ruling drops. They will not accept it. They will blame ACB and refuse to concede. The riots will start again. The fires, the looting, the violence. The WH will be surrounded.
17\ The [DS] will have their ghoulish black bloc brigades thoroughly convinced the election was stolen by Trump and that they need to remove him by force. Tensions will rise until the hoards overrun the WH grounds and attempt to remove the POTUS, who will be absent.
18\ It is around this time we will get the message via Twitter: “My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us.” and the Insurrection Act will be finally invoked. The military and federalized NG will restore order to the streets, and will conduct all investigations into the fraud.
19\ What evidence do you think they’ll use to conduct these investigations? Possibly all the evidence being collected now and being displayed for all to see in these hearings? Would they add more of their own evidence? Treason will be declared and perp walks will begin.
20\ If you don’t think POTUS has these authorities under the Insurrection Act, I’d refer you to D11, where the authority is directly implied.
21\ So we’re just waiting on the SCOTUS rulings and the invocation of the Insurrection Act. That’s what all this is leading up to. POTUS and white hats had to show the people the truth and that all options to correct the fraud had been expended before invoking the Act, however.
22\ So what does this mean for we Patriots right now? Do we sit back and do nothing? No. We stand and we fight! We continue protesting and shouting and calling our reps to support each other. We share the truth of the evidence far and wide. We push back against the MSM narrative.
23\ We must let our supportive reps know that we stand with them, and we must let other Patriots know they are not alone. Do not hang your head when the “losses” come for we knew they would. They must to prove the necessity of the actions to be taken later.
24\ Stand tall, Patriot, knowing your voice will be heard. Stand tall, Patriot, knowing the truth will be shown. Stand tall, Patriot, knowing the corruption is nearing its end. This is not another 4-year election. No war. No civil unrest. Clean and swift. God wins.
You can read the full thread here.
And if you’re more of a visual learner, you can listen to my friend Daniel break it all down here:
Before you go, please vote in my poll now that you know what it means!
Vote here….👇
NATIONAL POLL: Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now?


welovetrump--2020-12-12--Everything You Need To Know About “Faithless Electors” and How They Could Hand President Trump The W

Everything You Need To Know About “Faithless Electors” and How They Could Hand President Trump The Win (it’s happened before!)

Have you heard about “ faithless electors ” ?
You probably have , but do you know how they work ?
The most basic way to explain it is the people who actually vote in the Electoral College vote are not legally bound to vote the same way as the popular vote in that state .
In other words , if they think the vote was wrong or should not be followed through in some way , they have the legal right to vote however they want .
So if they feel the fraud has been proven , they have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ duty — to vote their conscience and they could absolutely vote for Donald Trump !
Remember “ faithless electors ” — those almost mythical rogues who Hillary Clinton fans once desperately hoped could save them from a victorious Donald Trump four years ago ?
Well , there is still such a thing as faithless electors , they are still an incredible longshot , and Trump fans too can now place the very slimmest of hopes in them .
So what are faithless electors again ?
As a refresher , when we fill in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we are actually selecting a slate of “ electors , ” human beings who are bound to vote for a particular party ’ s candidate when they meet next month in their respective state capitals .
For example , the president won Florida ’ s 29 electoral votes on Tuesday night after a majority of voters there , more than 5.6 million people , filled in the oval for President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence .
But those millions of Floridians were actually voting for their state ’ s Republican @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chosen by their state GOP leaders .
“ When a voter casts a vote for a candidate for President of the United States , s/he is in actuality casting a vote for the presidential electors who were selected by that candidate ’ s party , ” as the National Conference of State Legislatures explains .
All 29 of Florida ’ s electors are bound to vote for Trump and Pence — and will head to Florida ’ s statehouse and cast their pledged vote for the GOP ticket on Dec. 14 .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country — in New York , for instance , which also has 29 Electoral College votes and which was easily won by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris .
As in Florida , on Dec. 14 , New York ’ s 29 electors — loyalists chosen by state Democratic leaders — will dutifully report to Albany .
They ’ ll cast their votes for Biden-Harris .
As a formality , Congress will then meet in joint session on Jan. 6 for the official tally of the Electoral College votes .
That ’ s what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ almost always does , without a hitch or surprise .
But that ’ s where “ faithless electors ” could come in — rogues who vote for someone else , or who abstain entirely .
It ’ s happened 85 times in America ’ s history , according to Fairvote.org , which advocates for the abolishment of the Electoral College .
That number includes three electors who abstained .
“ The other 82 Electoral votes were changed on the personal initiative of the Elector , ” Fairvote.org says .
Most of the faithlessness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defection in 1836 , for example , when 23 Virginia electors revolted .
But it has happened as recently as 2016 , when 10 electors went rogue — and seven of those votes actually stuck .
Trump lost two electoral votes that year .
But Clinton lost five — in any event not enough to alter what happened at the polls , as Fortune.com notes .
It happened again in 2004 , when one Minnesota elector declined to vote , as pledged , for Democrat John Kerry and instead voted for Kerry ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That bit of lone roguishness had also no bearing on the election , as the incumbent Republican president , George W. Bush , had already handily won .
Most states — 32 — have laws on the books governing faithless electors , typically allowing the rogue ’ s removal and replacement , plus a low fine .
But a unanimous Supreme Court ruling from July stiffened the rights of states to replace rogues who refuse to cast their votes for the presidential candidate they are pledged to support , NPR.org reported then .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ so strong that it would seem to allow states to remove faithless electors even without a state law , ” NPR reported of the ruling .
The Supreme Court was acting in response to the 2016 rogue rebellion — but also looking ahead .
The possibility of overturning an Electoral College victory by faithless electors “ changing just a few votes ” would lead to chaos , Justice Samuel Alito wrote .
It would “ prompt the losing party … to launch a massive campaign to try to influence electors , and there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about who the next president was going to be .
Last month ’ s election turns out to have been the pre-season .
The real election for president is set for Monday , when groups large and small will gather in state capitals across the country and cast their votes as part of the Electoral College , effectively appointing the next chief executive .
The outcome is not in doubt .
According to the results certified in each state , Democrat Joseph R. Biden won 25 states and the District of Columbia and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ won 25 states , too , but his are more sparsely populated and earned just 232 electoral votes .
The electors themselves were chosen by the parties earlier in the year , in many cases well before Democrats even knew Mr. Biden and his running mate , Kamala D. Harris , would be their nominees .
The system of electors was created by the Constitution ’ s Article II and solidified in the 12th and 23rd Amendments — though the term Electoral College doesn ’ t actually appear in the founding document .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the president by direct popular election , by a vote of state legislatures , or by Congress .
As the founders envisioned it , the average voter might not know enough to make an informed decision about national candidates , but he could select local leaders who would be capable .
Thus when voters went to the polls last month , they were actually casting ballots for a slate of electors .
Since Mr. Biden won Virginia , his electors will be the ones voting for president in that state on Monday .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Carolina , so his electors will be the ones voting there .
“ It is a very convoluted process that has evolved over time and is something quite different from what the Founders envisioned , ” said Rebecca Green , a professor and co-director of the Election Law Program at William & Mary Law School .
“ When you look at the certification of the vote , the safe harbor , and the Electoral College , these are all just one more step by which the results become more and more finalized.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or anyone holding “ an office of trust or profit under the United States , ” but can be most anyone else the party chooses .
The Congressional Research Service said they turn out to be “ a mixture of state and local elected officials , party activists , celebrities and ordinary citizens.
” “ With the electors you ’ ll see a lot of variation , ” said Louis Gurvich , chairman of the Louisiana GOP , which picked its electors by caucus in February .
“ It ’ s not an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ around , quietly , that you ’ d be interested in being an elector .
It ’ s something you can put on your political resume.
” Generally , the electors gather in their state capitols and hold two votes : one for president , another for vice president .
The only change that COVID appears to have made is moving the votes to a bigger room .
Every state has a winner-take-all approach to electors , save for Maine and Nebraska , which dole out two electors to the statewide winner , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two in the case of Maine , three in Nebraska — based on the victor in each congressional district .
In this year , as has happened more often in recent years , both of those states will split their electoral votes , with Mr. Trump winning one of Maine ’ s four votes and Mr. Biden collecting one of Nebraska ’ s five votes .
The Hill has a more negative view : Although The Hill admits it has happened before , they cast doubt on Trump ’ s chances ( have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ become ?
I have . )
: Donald Trump ’ s options continue to narrow .
The president lost the Electoral College vote to Joe Biden , 306 to 232 .
Trump has sought , unsuccessfully , to delay certification in states that Biden narrowly won , including Michigan , Georgia , Arizona and Pennsylvania .
His legal team ’ s allegations of voter fraud have not fared any better , failing to produce evidence that meets a legal standard .
Now time itself no longer is on the president ’ s side @ @ @ @ @ @ @ electors will gather in their states and cast their ballots on Dec. 14 , the penultimate step before Congress finalizes the count on Jan. 6 , 2021 .
So what might the president still do ?
Given that Trump seems disinterested in any traditional concession — and that many of his media allies and supporters are invested in struggling on , no matter the odds — one of his few remaining strategies might be an appeal for electors to “ turn rogue ” and support him , even if they are pledged to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this is not a promising path for the president , either .
A quick civics refresher : As Tom Goldstein reported on SCOTUSblog , Remember that when we vote for president , we are not actually voting for the candidate we prefer , but rather for a slate of electors .
Almost every state — except for Maine and Nebraska , which allocate a single elector via winning the popular vote in a congressional district — awards every elector to the statewide popular vote victor .
The U.S. Constitution provides latitude to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the person of their choosing .
On paper , that ’ s where it could get interesting .
Biden ’ s lead in the popular vote is approaching 7 million .
Nevertheless , under the rules of the game , Trump ’ s campaign would need to convince 37 electors pledged to Biden to vote for Trump instead , rather than the winner of their state ’ s popular vote , in order to tie the Electoral College and pitch the election into the U.S. House .
It ’ s the longest of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the District of Columbia require electors to vote for the candidate to which they are pledged .
Nineteen of those states , as well as Washington , D.C. , went for Biden — which means that 199 electors of the 270 are pledged by law to the former vice president .
While many states do not provide a penalty for a “ faithless elector , ” 14 states do allow for the vote to be canceled and the immediate replacement of the elector .
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ called Chiafalo v Washington .
Trump , then , faces a shrinking pool .
He would need 37 of the remaining 106 Biden electors to switch sides .
History shows how unlikely this would be .
Faithless electors , after all , never have changed the outcome of a presidential election .
More than that , so far , only one elector in the nation ’ s history has ever cast a vote for the opposite party ’ s nominee instead of his or her own in a close race .
For that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way back to 1796 , the very first contested presidential election , when Samuel Miles , a Federalist from Pennsylvania , voted for Thomas Jefferson rather than his own party ’ s candidate , John Adams .
Indeed , there have been a total of 23,507 electoral votes cast across 58 presidential elections .
Only 90 of them have been cast as “ deviant ” votes .
And 63 of those were cast for another candidate because of the death of a losing candidate — Horace Greeley , in 1872 — between the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
8,416 views
Have you heard about “faithless electors”?
You probably have, but do you know how they work?
The most basic way to explain it is the people who actually vote in the Electoral College vote are not legally bound to vote the same way as the popular vote in that state.
In other words, if they think the vote was wrong or should not be followed through in some way, they have the legal right to vote however they want.
So if they feel the fraud has been proven, they have a legal right — if not a duty — to vote their conscience and they could absolutely vote for Donald Trump!
Take a look:
Faithless electors could put Donald J. Trump in for a second term! Here's what happens next….https://t.co/u8mxfc7hNi — DailyTruthReport (@DailyTruthRpt) December 12, 2020
From the NY Post:
Remember “faithless electors” — those almost mythical rogues who Hillary Clinton fans once desperately hoped could save them from a victorious Donald Trump four years ago? Well, there is still such a thing as faithless electors, they are still an incredible longshot, and Trump fans too can now place the very slimmest of hopes in them. So what are faithless electors again? As a refresher, when we fill in those ballot ovals to select a president, we are actually selecting a slate of “electors,” human beings who are bound to vote for a particular party’s candidate when they meet next month in their respective state capitals. For example, the president won Florida’s 29 electoral votes on Tuesday night after a majority of voters there, more than 5.6 million people, filled in the oval for President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence. But those millions of Floridians were actually voting for their state’s Republican “electors” — 29 party loyalists chosen by their state GOP leaders. “When a voter casts a vote for a candidate for President of the United States, s/he is in actuality casting a vote for the presidential electors who were selected by that candidate’s party,” as the National Conference of State Legislatures explains. All 29 of Florida’s electors are bound to vote for Trump and Pence — and will head to Florida’s statehouse and cast their pledged vote for the GOP ticket on Dec. 14. The same scenario will play out across the country — in New York, for instance, which also has 29 Electoral College votes and which was easily won by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. As in Florida, on Dec. 14, New York’s 29 electors — loyalists chosen by state Democratic leaders — will dutifully report to Albany. They’ll cast their votes for Biden-Harris. As a formality, Congress will then meet in joint session on Jan. 6 for the official tally of the Electoral College votes. That’s what is supposed to happen — and what almost always does, without a hitch or surprise. But that’s where “faithless electors” could come in — rogues who vote for someone else, or who abstain entirely. It’s happened 85 times in America’s history, according to Fairvote.org, which advocates for the abolishment of the Electoral College. That number includes three electors who abstained. “The other 82 Electoral votes were changed on the personal initiative of the Elector,” Fairvote.org says. Most of the faithlessness happened long ago, including a mass defection in 1836, for example, when 23 Virginia electors revolted. But it has happened as recently as 2016, when 10 electors went rogue — and seven of those votes actually stuck. Trump lost two electoral votes that year. But Clinton lost five — in any event not enough to alter what happened at the polls, as Fortune.com notes. It happened again in 2004, when one Minnesota elector declined to vote, as pledged, for Democrat John Kerry and instead voted for Kerry’s running mate, John Edwards. That bit of lone roguishness had also no bearing on the election, as the incumbent Republican president, George W. Bush, had already handily won. Most states — 32 — have laws on the books governing faithless electors, typically allowing the rogue’s removal and replacement, plus a low fine. But a unanimous Supreme Court ruling from July stiffened the rights of states to replace rogues who refuse to cast their votes for the presidential candidate they are pledged to support, NPR.org reported then. The court’s decision “is so strong that it would seem to allow states to remove faithless electors even without a state law,” NPR reported of the ruling. The Supreme Court was acting in response to the 2016 rogue rebellion — but also looking ahead. The possibility of overturning an Electoral College victory by faithless electors “changing just a few votes” would lead to chaos, Justice Samuel Alito wrote. It would “prompt the losing party … to launch a massive campaign to try to influence electors, and there would be a long period of uncertainty about who the next president was going to be.
Even with some state laws that allow states to fire faithless electors, Trump can still deny Sleepy Joe the presidency if he flips 37 Biden electors on December 14 — Patrick Howley (@HowleyReporter) December 12, 2020
Under the Constitution, there is no rule binding electors to vote for the candidate they were attached to on the ballot, and indeed “faithless electors” sometimes defy their voters’ wishes. #ElectoralCollege https://t.co/NTQw9mPRkn — The Washington Times (@WashTimes) December 12, 2020
From the Washington Times:
Last month’s election turns out to have been the pre-season. The real election for president is set for Monday, when groups large and small will gather in state capitals across the country and cast their votes as part of the Electoral College, effectively appointing the next chief executive. The outcome is not in doubt. According to the results certified in each state, Democrat Joseph R. Biden won 25 states and the District of Columbia and earned 306 electoral votes. President Trump won 25 states, too, but his are more sparsely populated and earned just 232 electoral votes. The electors themselves were chosen by the parties earlier in the year, in many cases well before Democrats even knew Mr. Biden and his running mate, Kamala D. Harris, would be their nominees. The system of electors was created by the Constitution’s Article II and solidified in the 12th and 23rd Amendments — though the term Electoral College doesn’t actually appear in the founding document. Using electors was a compromise between selecting the president by direct popular election, by a vote of state legislatures, or by Congress. As the founders envisioned it, the average voter might not know enough to make an informed decision about national candidates, but he could select local leaders who would be capable. Thus when voters went to the polls last month, they were actually casting ballots for a slate of electors. Since Mr. Biden won Virginia, his electors will be the ones voting for president in that state on Monday. Mr. Trump, meanwhile, won North Carolina, so his electors will be the ones voting there. “It is a very convoluted process that has evolved over time and is something quite different from what the Founders envisioned,” said Rebecca Green, a professor and co-director of the Election Law Program at William & Mary Law School. “When you look at the certification of the vote, the safe harbor, and the Electoral College, these are all just one more step by which the results become more and more finalized.” Electors cannot be federal elected officials or anyone holding “an office of trust or profit under the United States,” but can be most anyone else the party chooses. The Congressional Research Service said they turn out to be “a mixture of state and local elected officials, party activists, celebrities and ordinary citizens.” “With the electors you’ll see a lot of variation,” said Louis Gurvich, chairman of the Louisiana GOP, which picked its electors by caucus in February. “It’s not an election, but you can put it around, quietly, that you’d be interested in being an elector. It’s something you can put on your political resume.” Generally, the electors gather in their state capitols and hold two votes: one for president, another for vice president. The only change that COVID appears to have made is moving the votes to a bigger room. Every state has a winner-take-all approach to electors, save for Maine and Nebraska, which dole out two electors to the statewide winner, but then award the other electors — two in the case of Maine, three in Nebraska — based on the victor in each congressional district. In this year, as has happened more often in recent years, both of those states will split their electoral votes, with Mr. Trump winning one of Maine’s four votes and Mr. Biden collecting one of Nebraska’s five votes.
The Hill has a more negative view:
Although The Hill admits it has happened before, they cast doubt on Trump’s chances (have you noticed how far-left The Hill has become? I have.):


welovetrump--2020-12-13--Hunter Biden Failed To Report Over $400,000 Of Payments From Ukrainian Energy Company Burisma

Hunter Biden ’ s crooked business dealings are being exposed yet again .
According to recent reports Hunter Biden failed to reveal over $ 400,000 in payments he received from the Ukrainian energy company Burisma on his 2014 tax returns .
If you don ’ t remember in 2014 Joe Biden was the Vice resident of the United States .
Joe Biden also made a visit to Ukraine in 2015 and warned Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko that , if he did not fire Shokin the sitting prosecutor general , then Obama was prepared to withhold $ 1 billion in loan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is that Viktor Shokin the prosecutor general was literally investigating Burisma Energy Company the same company Joe Biden ’ s son was receiving a nice check from before he was fired .
There ’ s a reason Hunter failed to pay taxes on that $ 400,000 and it was to cover his family ’ s dirty tracks .
The New York Post exclusively covered the story and shared these details : Hunter Biden failed to disclose $ 400,000 in payments he received from the Ukrainian energy company Burisma on his tax returns according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Delaware laptop , according to NBC News .
“ In 2014 you joined the Burisma board and we still need to amend your 2014 returns to reflect the unreported Burisma income , ” wrote Hunter Biden ’ s business partner Eric Schwerin in a 2017 email , NBC reported .
In 2014 , Hunter Biden ’ s father — President-elect Joe Biden — was serving as vice president of the United States .
Hunter Biden sat on the board of Burisma from 2014 to 2019 .
The story bandwagons onto a series of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by The Post in October .
NATIONAL POLL : Are You Happy Melania Replaced Michelle As First Lady ?
President-elect Joe Biden ’ s son Hunter Biden failed to disclose $ 400,000 in payments from Ukrainian energy company Burisma on his 2014 tax returns , according to an email from his notorious subpoenaed laptop .
Eric Schwerin , president of Biden ’ s firm Rosemont Seneca , sent the email on January 16 , 2017 , noting that Hunter Biden ’ s total income for 2014 was more than $ 1.2 million , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ confirmation earlier this week that the Justice Department is investigating Hunter Biden ’ s tax matters , including his lucrative dealings with China .
‘ In 2014 you joined the Burisma board and we still need to amend your 2014 returns to reflect the unreported Burisma income , ’ says the email from Schwerin .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
2,159 views
Hunter Biden’s crooked business dealings are being exposed yet again.
According to recent reports Hunter Biden failed to reveal over $400,000 in payments he received from the Ukrainian energy company Burisma on his 2014 tax returns.
If you don’t remember in 2014 Joe Biden was the Vice resident of the United States.
Joe Biden also made a visit to Ukraine in 2015 and warned Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko that, if he did not fire Shokin the sitting prosecutor general, then Obama was prepared to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees.
The crazy part about it is that Viktor Shokin the prosecutor general was literally investigating Burisma Energy Company the same company Joe Biden’s son was receiving a nice check from before he was fired.
Talk about a major conflict of interest!
There’s a reason Hunter failed to pay taxes on that $400,000 and it was to cover his family’s dirty tracks.
An email obtained by @NBCNews indicates President-elect Biden’s son was told he did not disclose $400,000 in income from the Burisma gas company on his 2014 tax returns. https://t.co/vV1i7LVab3 — NBC News (@NBCNews) December 12, 2020
Hunter never paid $400k on taxes from the compnay his dad Joe Biden said he never worked for . come #CNN. do you job! pic.twitter.com/eNtk1AlJCm — Joe (@lipmannj) December 11, 2020
Everything the Democrats accuse trump of they’re actually doing! https://t.co/zEA06KCrRo — mustang girl (@Marco15Trump) December 12, 2020
The New York Post exclusively covered the story and shared these details:
Hunter Biden failed to disclose $400,000 in payments he received from the Ukrainian energy company Burisma on his tax returns according to yet more revelations contained on his Delaware laptop, according to NBC News. “In 2014 you joined the Burisma board and we still need to amend your 2014 returns to reflect the unreported Burisma income,” wrote Hunter Biden’s business partner Eric Schwerin in a 2017 email, NBC reported. In 2014, Hunter Biden’s father — President-elect Joe Biden — was serving as vice president of the United States. Hunter Biden sat on the board of Burisma from 2014 to 2019. The story bandwagons onto a series of exclusive reports about the Biden laptop published by The Post in October.
Reminder: Burisma paid Hunter Biden a million a year despite the fact that he had *zero* expertise or industry experience…but he did have a father who got an investigator looking into Burisma sacked by threatening to withhold a billion dollar loan guarantee to Ukraine. https://t.co/sBmCHqaUzI — Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) December 12, 2020
https://twitter.com/zero_to_here_oh/status/1337901849039532034
The Daily Mail shared these details:
President-elect Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden failed to disclose $400,000 in payments from Ukrainian energy company Burisma on his 2014 tax returns, according to an email from his notorious subpoenaed laptop. Eric Schwerin, president of Biden’s firm Rosemont Seneca, sent the email on January 16, 2017, noting that Hunter Biden’s total income for 2014 was more than $1.2 million, according to NBC News. It follows confirmation earlier this week that the Justice Department is investigating Hunter Biden’s tax matters, including his lucrative dealings with China. ‘In 2014 you joined the Burisma board and we still need to amend your 2014 returns to reflect the unreported Burisma income,’ says the email from Schwerin.


welovetrump--2020-12-13--Antifa Militant Who Stabbed Trump Supporters Gets Beat Up By The Proud Boys

Last night was absolute chaos in D.C. Over 10,000 Trump supporters made their way to D.C. to support President Trump in the Stop the Steally rally and the Jericho March and the day was mostly peaceful .
A large number of Antifa militants took the streets and started to attack Trump supporters .
One Antifa member was carrying a knife around the city and was stabbing Trump supporters and eventually stabbed a Proud Boy member who was trying to stop the man .
Word got out about the stabbing and Proud Boys members immediately got justice and started beating up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump supporters .
NBC Washington covered the violence that took place and added these details : Nine people have been injured — including four who were stabbed — and at least 23 arrests have been made during a volatile night of clashes between supporters of President Donald Trump and counterprotesters in Washington , D.C. Saturday night ’ s chaotic scenes follow a day of rallies that brought crowds of Trump supporters to town .
In late afternoon , police said that beyond minor scuffles , there had been no major acts of violence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
After sunset , however , tense moments began to unfold , with sporadic clashes breaking out between Trump supporters and counterprotesters .
Officers attempted to keep members from opposing groups separated .
One Christian Couple was simply walking to their hotel when Antifa started harassing them .
New York Post added details about the Stabbing incident : Violence erupted in Washington , D.C. , on Saturday night as Proud Boys and Antifa clashed after a day of pro-Trump demonstrations , leaving a female cop injured and at least four people stabbed — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The video shows a lone African American counter-protester , dressed all in black , as he is surrounded outside Harry ’ s Bar at 11th and F streets NW by a group of shouting white men .
But when he ’ s shoved from behind , the lone counter-protester pulls what appears to be a gravity knife from his right coat pocket .
He flicks it open and holds it down at his side as he continues trying to walk off — and the group surrounding him bursts into screams and shouts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to him .
“ He ’ s got a knife !
” they shout .
Others in the crowd shout , “ Get back !
Get back !
” The counter-protester appears to be swinging his knife and running away as some in the crowd then give chase and tackle him .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
16,879 views
Last night was absolute chaos in D.C.
Over 10,000 Trump supporters made their way to D.C. to support President Trump in the Stop the Steally rally and the Jericho March and the day was mostly peaceful.
When night hit things changed immediately.
A large number of Antifa militants took the streets and started to attack Trump supporters.
One Antifa member was carrying a knife around the city and was stabbing Trump supporters and eventually stabbed a Proud Boy member who was trying to stop the man.
Word got out about the stabbing and Proud Boys members immediately got justice and started beating up the man who was running around stabbing Trump supporters.
Photos of a Proud Boy member being stabbed in DC by Antifa/BLM member. pic.twitter.com/Pn76e9ksDr — Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 (@MarinaMedvin) December 13, 2020
Cops just watching as Proud Boys beat the hell out of an Antifa militant who was stabbing Trump supporters. https://t.co/3fXSZcXptW — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) December 13, 2020
BREAKING 4 Stabbed in Downtown DC as President Trump Supporters, Counterprotesters Clash.@nbcwashington’s @darcyspencer reports. https://t.co/wSofNKOwHq — Shomari Stone (@shomaristone) December 13, 2020
Several people were stabbed in Washington D.C. and one was shot in Olympia, Wash., as Trump supporters and opponents clashed at pro-Trump protests. https://t.co/Cs2vg6bbMh — The New York Times (@nytimes) December 13, 2020
NBC Washington covered the violence that took place and added these details:
Nine people have been injured — including four who were stabbed — and at least 23 arrests have been made during a volatile night of clashes between supporters of President Donald Trump and counterprotesters in Washington, D.C. Saturday night’s chaotic scenes follow a day of rallies that brought crowds of Trump supporters to town. In late afternoon, police said that beyond minor scuffles, there had been no major acts of violence or criminal activity as of late afternoon. After sunset, however, tense moments began to unfold, with sporadic clashes breaking out between Trump supporters and counterprotesters. Officers attempted to keep members from opposing groups separated.
One Christian Couple was simply walking to their hotel when Antifa started harassing them.
DC: Christian Trump Supporting Couple physically assaulted and maced by Antifa/BLM militants #tatumreport #drewhernandez pic.twitter.com/m4CSy2dZOc — Drew Hernandez (@DrewHLive) December 12, 2020
https://twitter.com/NewRightNetwork/status/1337975780937256968
New York Post added details about the Stabbing incident:


welovetrump--2020-12-13--Exposed: Facebook’s “Independent Fact-Checker” Is A Huge Hillary Clinton Supporter

A Facebook independent fact-checker who has spoken critically about President Trump has now been revealed as a big Hillary Clinton supporter .
According to Facebook , a fact-checker must be “ non-partisan ” but Margot Susca has been anything but non-partisan .
Evidence has revealed Susca has repeatedly posted about her distrust towards Trump and has even appeared on Russia Today to criticize President Trump .
Susca holds a key position in the Fact-Checking Network group who partnered with Facebook to censor anything that doesn ’ t resonate with the Left ’ s agenda .
Sky News broke the story @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Twitter activist critical of Donald Trump who brags about being on “ team ” Hillary Clinton is the supposedly independent expert in charge of who can become a Facebook fact-checker .
The process of becoming a fact-checker is described as “ non-partisan ” by Facebook but a Sky News Australia investigation has uncovered disturbing evidence of political bias and lack of accountability at the top levels of the certification process .
International Fact-Checking Network certifier and American University School of Communication professor Margot Susca is unashamedly politically biased but she was responsible for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organisations to become fact-checkers .
This includes the Associated Press , Check Your Fact , Decrypteurs , Lead Stories , Media Wise and The Dispatch .
Ms Susca has appeared on propaganda network Russia Today to criticise President Trump and has tweeted that it would be a “ dereliction of duty ” to broadcast his speeches .
NATIONAL POLL : Should Nancy Pelosi Be Removed From Office ?
At this point , Zuckerberg is lying thru his teeth if he thinks these “ independent fact-checkers ” aren ’ t picking sides .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
3,011 views
Surprise, surprise.
A Facebook independent fact-checker who has spoken critically about President Trump has now been revealed as a big Hillary Clinton supporter.
According to Facebook, a fact-checker must be “non-partisan” but Margot Susca has been anything but non-partisan.
Evidence has revealed Susca has repeatedly posted about her distrust towards Trump and has even appeared on Russia Today to criticize President Trump.
Susca holds a key position in the Fact-Checking Network group who partnered with Facebook to censor anything that doesn’t resonate with the Left’s agenda.
An outspoken Twitter activist critical of Donald Trump who brags about being on “team” Hillary Clinton is the supposedly *independent expert* in charge of who can become a Facebook fact-checker.
https://t.co/bhwkj9EgBb — Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) December 11, 2020
An outspoken anti-Trump Twitter activist who bragged about being on Hillary Clinton's team is the expert in charge of certifying Facebook fact-checkers. https://t.co/BRGWXdgxUQ — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) December 11, 2020
EXCLUSIVE: An outspoken Twitter activist critical of @realDonaldTrump who brags about being on “team” Hillary Clinton is the supposedly independent expert in charge of who can become a Facebook fact-checker. @Houghtontweets https://t.co/YLBwbsVGKq — Sky News Australia (@SkyNewsAust) December 10, 2020
Sky News broke the story and released these details:
An outspoken Twitter activist critical of Donald Trump who brags about being on “team” Hillary Clinton is the supposedly independent expert in charge of who can become a Facebook fact-checker. The process of becoming a fact-checker is described as “non-partisan” by Facebook but a Sky News Australia investigation has uncovered disturbing evidence of political bias and lack of accountability at the top levels of the certification process. NATIONAL POLL: Do You Still Support President Trump? International Fact-Checking Network certifier and American University School of Communication professor Margot Susca is unashamedly politically biased but she was responsible for issuing 19 fact-check licenses or reviews for organisations to become fact-checkers. This includes the Associated Press, Check Your Fact, Decrypteurs, Lead Stories, Media Wise and The Dispatch. Ms Susca has appeared on propaganda network Russia Today to criticise President Trump and has tweeted that it would be a “dereliction of duty” to broadcast his speeches.
Facebook “Fact Checker” Bragged About Being on “Team Hillary” https://t.co/aD8iLTXSZa — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) December 11, 2020
FACEBOOK'S FACT CHECKER IN CHIEF IS A CLINTON FANATIC https://t.co/sTGv57Iq0s — ZippyTheChicken@GAB 🇺🇸 (@ZippyTheChicken) December 11, 2020
At this point, Zuckerberg is lying thru his teeth if he thinks these “independent fact-checkers” aren’t picking sides.


welovetrump--2020-12-13--President Trump Makes Christmas Eve A Federal Holiday

How has this not happened yet !
President Trump has signed an executive order that says “ all executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government shall be closed and their employees excused from duty on Thursday , December 24 , 2020″ .
Obama and Clinton both only gave half days to Federal workers on Christmas Eve but President Trump has one-upped them and has given federal workers a full day off .
The New York Post covered Trump ’ s Executive Order and added these details : President Trump on Friday signed an order giving federal workers a paid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The news was a welcome surprise for workers who expected at most a half day .
Trump ’ s order says , “ All executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government shall be closed and their employees excused from duty on Thursday , December 24 , 2020 , the day before Christmas Day.
” Former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton only gave half days when Christmas fell on a Friday , as it does this year .
Obama allowed a half day in 2015 and 2009 , GovExec reported .
Clinton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
NATIONAL POLL : Is CNN The Enemy Of The People ?
The Daily Mail didn ’ t stay behind and added to the story too : Trump ’ s order allows that certain employees may be required to work on Christmas Eve ‘ for reasons of national security , defense , or other public need.
’ When Trump closed federal agencies last year , he became the first president since Franklin D. Roosevelt make Christmas Eve a full holiday when it fell on a Tuesday .
Trump also gave federal employees Christmas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fell on a Monday .
Although Christmas Day is a designated federal holiday , there is no guarantee that federal workers will get extra time off for Christmas Eve .
Trump made support for Christmas part of his campaign in 2016 , vowing that he would support the holiday against the ‘ war on Christmas .
’

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
3,917 views
How has this not happened yet!
President Trump has signed an executive order that says “all executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government shall be closed and their employees excused from duty on Thursday, December 24, 2020″.
Obama and Clinton both only gave half days to Federal workers on Christmas Eve but President Trump has one-upped them and has given federal workers a full day off.
Donald Trump makes Christmas Eve a full holiday for federal workers for third year in a row https://t.co/kmSNVVqODn — Daily Mail US (@DailyMail) December 12, 2020
Trump makes Christmas Eve a federal holiday with full day off for government workers https://t.co/baKZvXb247 — The Sun (@TheSun) December 12, 2020
Today’s Left can’t cancel everything. Merry Christmas! https://t.co/QVWGMO0Zm0 — Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) December 12, 2020
The New York Post covered Trump’s Executive Order and added these details:
President Trump on Friday signed an order giving federal workers a paid day off work on Christmas Eve. The news was a welcome surprise for workers who expected at most a half day. Trump’s order says, “All executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government shall be closed and their employees excused from duty on Thursday, December 24, 2020, the day before Christmas Day.” Former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton only gave half days when Christmas fell on a Friday, as it does this year. Obama allowed a half day in 2015 and 2009, GovExec reported. Clinton also allowed a half day in 1998.
Update on the War On Christmas: President Trump makes Christmas Eve a federal holidayhttps://t.co/rGoxpzFmmi — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) December 11, 2020
The Daily Mail didn’t stay behind and added to the story too:
PRAYER CHAIN FOR TRUMP: Please add your name and a prayer to support our President! Trump’s order allows that certain employees may be required to work on Christmas Eve ‘for reasons of national security, defense, or other public need.’ When Trump closed federal agencies last year, he became the first president since Franklin D. Roosevelt make Christmas Eve a full holiday when it fell on a Tuesday. Trump also gave federal employees Christmas Eve off in 2018, when it fell on a Monday. Although Christmas Day is a designated federal holiday, there is no guarantee that federal workers will get extra time off for Christmas Eve. Trump made support for Christmas part of his campaign in 2016, vowing that he would support the holiday against the ‘war on Christmas.’


welovetrump--2020-12-14--Former Aide Says Governor Andrew Cuomo Sexually Harassed Her “For Years”

There ’ s a saying that ’ s been used by leftists for several years now : “ Believe all @ @ @ @ @ whenever any woman accuses a man of sexual assault , her accusations are to be @ @ @ @ @ default ( guilty until proven innocent ) .
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo was just @ @ @ @ @ by former aide Lindsey Boylan .
Let ’ s see if the lefties hold true @ @ @ @ @ I ’ m not going to hold my breath…

There’s a saying that’s been used by leftists for several years now: “Believe all women.”
This means that whenever any woman accuses a man of sexual assault, her accusations are to be taken as the truth by default (guilty until proven innocent).
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo was just credibly accused of sexual harassment by former aide Lindsey Boylan.
Let’s see if the lefties hold true to their own rules.
I’m not going to hold my breath…


welovetrump--2020-12-14--Powell Says Trump Could Trigger Executive Order on Foreign Interference From 2018

The 2020 presidential election is still very much undecided , but an executive order from two years ago may be @ @ @ @ @ in President Donald Trump ’ s favor .
In 2018 , president Trump signed an @ @ @ @ @ sanctions on foreign countries that interfere in U.S. elections .
Lawyer Sidney Powell argued on @ @ @ @ @ s 2018 executive order could come into play now .
Powell stated that due to @ @ @ @ @ ’ s election “ it ’ s more than sufficient to trigger ” the president @ @ @ @ @

The 2020 presidential election is still very much undecided, but an executive order from two years ago may be able to turn the tides in President Donald Trump’s favor.
In 2018, president Trump signed an executive order that would authorize sanctions on foreign countries that interfere in U.S. elections.
This order declared foreign election meddling as a national emergency.
Lawyer Sidney Powell argued on Sunday that President Trump’s 2018 executive order could come into play now.
Powell stated that due to the interference in this year’s election “it’s more than sufficient to trigger” the president’s executive order.