welovetrump--2020-12-04--Lin Wood Fires Back After Apparent “Backstabbing” by Breitbart

Don ’ t do this to us .
We have enough Fake News already .
And the apparent betrayal by Fox News hurts enough as it is .
In case you missed it , Breitbart ran what appeared to be a hit piece on attorney Lin Wood .
Not only was it a hit piece .
But they had MULTIPLE main headlines against Lin Wood .
Wood , of course , has been among those leading the charge for President Trump !
Below is a screenshot of the controversial headlines and article : The headlines quickly drew attention from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against Breitbart , which is typically considered a reliably conservative news outlet .
Below are some of the responses : The article apparently caught the attention of Lin Wood himself .
Wood took to Twitter to fire back against Breitbart .
He wanted to set the record straight… and we are glad that he did !
Here is what Lin Wood had to say : Conservatives have already lost 1 reliably conservative outlet : The Drudge Report .
Many people have noticed that Drudge appears to be radically liberal these days .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is very concerning… and for good reason .
This is just some of what Breitbart posted about Lin Wood : Georgia-based attorney Lin Wood is getting lots of attention for urging supporters of President Donald Trump to break with the president and not vote for GOP Sens .
David Perdue ( R-GA ) and Kelly Loeffler ( R-GA ) in the upcoming January 5 runoff elections .
Wood ’ s public comments run counter to President Trump ’ s own public statements and wishes , as the president has repeatedly urged his supporters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heading to Valdosta , Georgia , on Saturday to rally with the GOP senators .
Wood ’ s comments are also in line with what top national Democrats are pushing for , as Breitbart News has reported a national anti-Trump Democrat Super PAC called “ Really American PAC ” is running billboards carrying a message nearly identical to what Wood is saying .
While Wood made his comments purportedly as a self-described supporter of Trump , while donning a red “ Make America Great Again ” ball cap , the real story here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Republican and there is no record in Georgia of him ever voting for President Trump—in 2016 or in 2020—in the Republican primaries .
While Wood did vote in the 2020 and 2016 general elections in Georgia—there are no records in Georgia of him pulling a GOP primary ballot in 2016 or 2020 , the two years President Trump was on the ticket .
Ironically , in both the 2020 and 2016 general elections , state records show that Wood voted absentee—by mail—in Georgia , part of the same system he is now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ himself , Vice President Mike Pence is making a second trip to Georgia later this week to campaign for Loeffler and Perdue and the president ’ s eldest son Donald Trump Jr. has been vocal in his support for them as well .
That ’ s what is so interesting about these people claiming to support the president ’ s interests telling Georgians not to back the president ’ s candidates for Senate in the runoffs .
But maybe it is not so complicated when looking at the voting history and political donation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ narrative , Wood .
Wood has long supported Democrats in the state of Georgia , and now with U.S. Senate hanging in the balance he has positioned himself as a leading voice of the MAGA movement .
Republicans currently have at least 50 seats in the Senate going into next year and Democrats currently have at least 48 seats .
If Democrats were to take both of these runoff elections and tie the Senate 50-50 next year , then assuming Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden emerges victorious from President Trump ’ s election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control of the upper chamber of Congress .
While Trump is still pursuing challenges , every state in which he is contesting the results has certified a win for Biden–making the president ’ s battle even more of a long shot .
In a scenario where Biden emerges victorious , and the Democrat candidates Jon Ossoff and Rev .
Raphael Warnock win these Senate seats in Georgia ’ s runoffs , that would mean now Sen. Kamala Harris ( D-CA ) –who would be Vice President of the United States in that situation–would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minority Leader Chuck Schumer ( D-NY ) would become the majority leader and control the floor and committees of the Senate .
Maybe that ’ s why Wood , who backed Democrats for years until Trump , is urging Trump supporters to throw the election to the Democrats .
Georgia records show that Wood has voted in every general election dating back to 2000 , in person in 2000 , 2002 , 2004 , 2006 , 2008 , 2010 , 2012 , and 2014—and then via absentee or mail ballot in 2016 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also show that Wood has not voted in a Republican primary since 2004 , but did request Democrat ballots in the 2006 , 2008 , 2010 , and 2018 primary elections in Georgia .
That means that even when Trump was president , in the 2018 midterm elections , Wood requested a Democrat primary ballot in Georgia and voted for Democrats in the primary in the state while Trump was universally backing Republicans there .
Wood also did not request primary ballots of either party , the records show , in 2016 or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the GOP primary .
Wood also has a long history of donating to top Democrats ’ presidential , gubernatorial , senatorial , and congressional campaigns .
While he did shift a little bit during the Trump era and made some donations to Trump and some congressional Republicans and to the Republican National Committee , per Federal Election Commission ( FEC ) records , Wood has long backed Democrats for federal office and especially for Georgia offices .
Donations to Democrat Party politicians from Wood over a decade plus total more than $ 40,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as 2004 through as recently as 2018 .
Campaign finance records show that Wood has donated thousands and thousands of dollars to top Democrats like former President Barack Obama , who he gave $ 2,300 to in 2008 over two separate donations .
In 2004 , Wood funded the Democrat presidential campaign of then-Sen. John Edwards ( D-NC ) with $ 500 split over two separate donations .
If PAST donations were the true litmus test in politics , then President Trump would have never become the Republican nominee… let alone President of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Trump supporters are “ delusional ” for investigating voter fraud .
NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Support President Trump ?
They want to spin their own conspiracies about the lawyers representing President Trump .
Now is not the time for infighting .
Now is the time to unite against a common enemy : those who would subvert the integrity of our elections !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
29,529 views
Come on, Breitbart.
Don’t do this to us.
We have enough Fake News already.
And the apparent betrayal by Fox News hurts enough as it is.
In case you missed it, Breitbart ran what appeared to be a hit piece on attorney Lin Wood.
Not only was it a hit piece.
But they had MULTIPLE main headlines against Lin Wood.
Wood, of course, has been among those leading the charge for President Trump!
Below is a screenshot of the controversial headlines and article:
The headlines quickly drew attention from the MAGA faithful.
But…
The tides turned quickly against Breitbart, which is typically considered a reliably conservative news outlet.
Below are some of the responses:
The whole “LiN wOoD vOtEd dEmOcRaT!” thing is actually neoliberal signalling. The GOP establishment puts party over country. Remember they dinged Trump for the same thing in 15/16. I don’t know Wood or his background. But I know this is a dumb hack reason to write someone off. — Raheem Kassam (@RaheemKassam) December 3, 2020
As an addendum to this I see Breitbart is going big on this tonight. But do an archive search and it’s interesting how they promoted Lin Wood until they didn’t. pic.twitter.com/NlEq0xNGV8 — Raheem Kassam (@RaheemKassam) December 3, 2020
And yes…
The article apparently caught the attention of Lin Wood himself.
Wood took to Twitter to fire back against Breitbart.
He wanted to set the record straight… and we are glad that he did!
Here is what Lin Wood had to say:
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1334337607451422722?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1334337607451422722%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.citizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Flin-wood-fires-back-at-breitbart%2F
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1334333082682449920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1334333082682449920%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.citizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Flin-wood-fires-back-at-breitbart%2F
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1334333082682449920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1334333136457658368%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es2_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.citizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Flin-wood-fires-back-at-breitbart%2F
Conservatives have already lost 1 reliably conservative outlet: The Drudge Report.
Many people have noticed that Drudge appears to be radically liberal these days.
Will Breitbart follow in Drudge’s footsteps?
We hope not!
But their apparent hit piece on Lin Wood is very concerning… and for good reason.
This is just some of what Breitbart posted about Lin Wood:
Georgia-based attorney Lin Wood is getting lots of attention for urging supporters of President Donald Trump to break with the president and not vote for GOP Sens. David Perdue (R-GA) and Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) in the upcoming January 5 runoff elections. Wood’s public comments run counter to President Trump’s own public statements and wishes, as the president has repeatedly urged his supporters to support Loeffler and Perdue and is heading to Valdosta, Georgia, on Saturday to rally with the GOP senators. Wood’s comments are also in line with what top national Democrats are pushing for, as Breitbart News has reported a national anti-Trump Democrat Super PAC called “Really American PAC” is running billboards carrying a message nearly identical to what Wood is saying. While Wood made his comments purportedly as a self-described supporter of Trump, while donning a red “Make America Great Again” ball cap, the real story here is that Wood is by no means a Republican and there is no record in Georgia of him ever voting for President Trump—in 2016 or in 2020—in the Republican primaries. While Wood did vote in the 2020 and 2016 general elections in Georgia—there are no records in Georgia of him pulling a GOP primary ballot in 2016 or 2020, the two years President Trump was on the ticket. Ironically, in both the 2020 and 2016 general elections, state records show that Wood voted absentee—by mail—in Georgia, part of the same system he is now railing against. In addition to Trump himself, Vice President Mike Pence is making a second trip to Georgia later this week to campaign for Loeffler and Perdue and the president’s eldest son Donald Trump Jr. has been vocal in his support for them as well. That’s what is so interesting about these people claiming to support the president’s interests telling Georgians not to back the president’s candidates for Senate in the runoffs. But maybe it is not so complicated when looking at the voting history and political donation history of the chief instigator of this narrative, Wood. Wood has long supported Democrats in the state of Georgia, and now with U.S. Senate hanging in the balance he has positioned himself as a leading voice of the MAGA movement. Republicans currently have at least 50 seats in the Senate going into next year and Democrats currently have at least 48 seats. If Democrats were to take both of these runoff elections and tie the Senate 50-50 next year, then assuming Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden emerges victorious from President Trump’s election results challenges the Democrats would then take control of the upper chamber of Congress. While Trump is still pursuing challenges, every state in which he is contesting the results has certified a win for Biden–making the president’s battle even more of a long shot. In a scenario where Biden emerges victorious, and the Democrat candidates Jon Ossoff and Rev. Raphael Warnock win these Senate seats in Georgia’s runoffs, that would mean now Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA)–who would be Vice President of the United States in that situation–would cut ties in the Senate and now Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) would become the majority leader and control the floor and committees of the Senate. Maybe that’s why Wood, who backed Democrats for years until Trump, is urging Trump supporters to throw the election to the Democrats. Georgia records show that Wood has voted in every general election dating back to 2000, in person in 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014—and then via absentee or mail ballot in 2016, 2018, and 2020. State records also show that Wood has not voted in a Republican primary since 2004, but did request Democrat ballots in the 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2018 primary elections in Georgia. That means that even when Trump was president, in the 2018 midterm elections, Wood requested a Democrat primary ballot in Georgia and voted for Democrats in the primary in the state while Trump was universally backing Republicans there. Wood also did not request primary ballots of either party, the records show, in 2016 or 2020–when Trump was on the ballot in the GOP primary. Wood also has a long history of donating to top Democrats’ presidential, gubernatorial, senatorial, and congressional campaigns. While he did shift a little bit during the Trump era and made some donations to Trump and some congressional Republicans and to the Republican National Committee, per Federal Election Commission (FEC) records, Wood has long backed Democrats for federal office and especially for Georgia offices. Donations to Democrat Party politicians from Wood over a decade plus total more than $40,000, and span from as far back as 2004 through as recently as 2018. Campaign finance records show that Wood has donated thousands and thousands of dollars to top Democrats like former President Barack Obama, who he gave $2,300 to in 2008 over two separate donations. In 2004, Wood funded the Democrat presidential campaign of then-Sen. John Edwards (D-NC) with $500 split over two separate donations.
If PAST donations were the true litmus test in politics, then President Trump would have never become the Republican nominee… let alone President of the United States.
News outlets say that Trump supporters are “delusional” for investigating voter fraud.
Yet…
They want to spin their own conspiracies about the lawyers representing President Trump.
Now is not the time for infighting.
Now is the time to unite against a common enemy: those who would subvert the integrity of our elections!


welovetrump--2020-12-04--HOLY EVIDENCE! Raw Video of Secret Ballots in Suitcases Counted AFTER Poll Workers “Stopped” in GA R

HOLY EVIDENCE! Raw Video of Secret Ballots in Suitcases Counted AFTER Poll Workers “Stopped” in GA Released!

As though there wasn ’ t enough reason to doubt the “ official ” election results… New SECURITY VIDEO FOOTAGE from Georgia has been released .
The video shows suitcases filled with “ secret ” ballots being brought out in the middle of the night .
Poll workers were told to go home .
Poll workers went home and were told that the counting was stopped for the night .
That ’ s when the secret suitcases were brought out and these mysterious ballots were counted .
Now , it ’ s available for the public to see .
More @ @ @ @ @ @ @ below : Again , if Democrats have nothing to hide , then why are they so afraid of a true audit ?
And why did so many shady activities seem to happen only in the swing states ?
But that ’ s what investigations are for : to get to the truth .
If Democrats are obstructing justice , it is certainly not a good look for them .
Breitbart has more details on this disturbing story : Video evidence that appears to show stashed cases of ballots in Georgia was played during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Donald Trump ’ s attorney , former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani , presented bombshell evidence from surveillance cameras that appeared to catch cases of “ absentee and military ” ballots being pulled out from under a table to be counted in Fulton County , Georgia .
The alleged incident occurred at 10:30 p.m. at State Farm Arena after counting allegedly stopped when the observers and other workers were told to go home .
The woman testifying said she witnessed four “ suitcases ” be pulled out from under the table .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ blond braids ” told poll workers to leave the room .
Four people , including the woman with the braids who told the others to leave , stayed behind to continue counting votes , according to the allegation .
“ So what are these ballots doing there separate from all the other ballots and why are they only counting them whenever the place is cleared out with no witnesses ?
” Jacki Pick , a Trump legal team volunteer , asked the Georgia Senate .
Pick said the unobserved counting went on from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The attorney alleged the counting resumed only after the Republican observers and members of the media left the room .
Jenna Ellis , a member of Trump ’ s legal team , said it indicated “ fraud.
” “ Thousands of ballots pulled from under a table in suitcases and scanned , ” she said about the “ shocking ” evidence .
This truly is shocking evidence .
What else does Team Trump have that the public doesn ’ t yet know about ?
Fortunately , the governor of Georgia appears to FINALLY @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than never , right ?
Governor Kemp has no responded to the video and is calling for an audit in Georgia .
He wants the signatures to be matched .
He wants all ballots investigated .
Now… will something actually come of his demands ?
But this is a good first step in the right direction .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
21,905 views
As though there wasn’t enough reason to doubt the “official” election results…
New SECURITY VIDEO FOOTAGE from Georgia has been released.
The video shows suitcases filled with “secret” ballots being brought out in the middle of the night.
The most alarming part?
Poll workers were told to go home.
That’s right.
Poll workers went home and were told that the counting was stopped for the night.
That’s when the secret suitcases were brought out and these mysterious ballots were counted.
No poll watchers present.
And… it’s all on camera.
Now, it’s available for the public to see.
More details, including the video evidence, below:
https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1334569329334083586?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1334569329334083586%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.citizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fdisturbing-video-from-georgia-suitcases-filled-with-ballots%2F
Again, if Democrats have nothing to hide, then why are they so afraid of a true audit?
And why did so many shady activities seem to happen only in the swing states?
Maybe there’s a benign explanation for this…
But that’s what investigations are for: to get to the truth.
If Democrats are obstructing justice, it is certainly not a good look for them.
Breitbart has more details on this disturbing story:
Video evidence that appears to show stashed cases of ballots in Georgia was played during a legislative hearing on Thursday. President Donald Trump’s attorney, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, presented bombshell evidence from surveillance cameras that appeared to catch cases of “absentee and military” ballots being pulled out from under a table to be counted in Fulton County, Georgia. The alleged incident occurred at 10:30 p.m. at State Farm Arena after counting allegedly stopped when the observers and other workers were told to go home. The woman testifying said she witnessed four “suitcases” be pulled out from under the table. That occurred after a supervisor “with blond braids” told poll workers to leave the room. Four people, including the woman with the braids who told the others to leave, stayed behind to continue counting votes, according to the allegation. “So what are these ballots doing there separate from all the other ballots and why are they only counting them whenever the place is cleared out with no witnesses?” Jacki Pick, a Trump legal team volunteer, asked the Georgia Senate. Pick said the unobserved counting went on from 10:30 p.m. until about 1:00 a.m. The attorney alleged the counting resumed only after the Republican observers and members of the media left the room. Jenna Ellis, a member of Trump’s legal team, said it indicated “fraud.” “Thousands of ballots pulled from under a table in suitcases and scanned,” she said about the “shocking” evidence.
The VIDEO EVIDENCE being shown in the Georgia Senate Hearing is SHOCKING. Room cleared at 10:30pm. 4 people stay behind. Thousands of ballots pulled from under a table in suitcases and scanned. FRAUD!!! — Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) December 3, 2020
This truly is shocking evidence.
What else does Team Trump have that the public doesn’t yet know about?
Fortunately, the governor of Georgia appears to FINALLY be paying attention.
Hey… better late than never, right?
Governor Kemp has no responded to the video and is calling for an audit in Georgia.
He wants the signatures to be matched.
He wants all ballots investigated.
FINALLY.
Now… will something actually come of his demands?
Time will tell.
But this is a good first step in the right direction.
See Kemp’s response below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCme9vXj8iA
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1334711509977608192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1334711509977608192%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.citizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fbreaking-governor-brian-kemp-responds-to-bombshell-video%2F
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1334707562042839041?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1334707562042839041%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.citizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fbreaking-governor-brian-kemp-responds-to-bombshell-video%2F
Georgia Gov. Kemp calls for a signature audit from Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger following surveillance video alleged to show ballot-counting irregularities at State Farm Arena in Fulton County (Atlanta). Predicts we'll see more in next 24 hours pic.twitter.com/vOHR8S8Ey2 — Daniel Chaitin (@danielchaitin7) December 4, 2020


welovetrump--2020-12-04--This Obscure Law Could Be Trump’s Last Chance to Overturn Election Results

What happens if the Trump campaign ’ s lawsuits fail in court ?
What happens if the Supreme Court refuses to hear any of the appeals ?
What happens if a contingent election in Congress doesn ’ t happen ?
Is it over ?
Or is there still a path to re-inauguration for President Trump .
No matter what the media says , this race isn ’ t over .
This obscure law could be Trump ’ s final gambit to rightfully claim the presidency .
It is called the Electoral Count Act .
In fact , the Democrats tried @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2016 and 2000 elections .
But with widespread allegations of voter fraud and data irregularities , President Trump could succeed with this route .
In short , Congress must certify the election results after each state certifies its results .
But the certification process can be challenged .
It just takes 1 member from the House of Representatives and 1 Senator to join forces .
Together , they can challenge the electors from any state , forcing a debate on the House floors .
YouTuber StateOfDaniel explains more .
The relevant section starts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Politico has started reporting on the story .
There are multiple allies on Capitol Hill who are willing to fight for President Trump .
President Donald Trump ’ s arsenal for overturning the election will soon be down to one final , desperate maneuver : pressing his Republican allies on Capitol Hill to step in and derail Joe Biden ’ s presidency .
Although the Electoral College casts the official vote for president on Dec. 14 , it ’ s up to Congress to certify the results a few weeks later .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House and Senate the power to challenge the results from the floor — a rarely used mechanism meant to be the last of all last resorts to safeguard an election .
But several House Republican lawmakers and aides now tell POLITICO they ’ re considering this option to aid Trump ’ s quest .
“ Nothing is off the table , ” said Rep. Matt Gaetz ( R-Fla. ) .
Gaetz pointed out that in January 2017 , a handful of House Democrats took this precise procedural step before their efforts flamed out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over by none other than Biden , then the outgoing vice president .
“ It is over , ” Biden said at the time , gaveling down Democrats as Republicans cheered .
This time , Vice President Mike Pence will be in the chair for any potential challenges — a potentially awkward scenario as his boss continues to deny the reality of the election he lost .
Indeed , Trump lost the election .
His legal battles have failed to stop states from certifying his defeat .
And his bid to pressure state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appears to be going nowhere .
Congress — where Republicans are still largely in lockstep with Trump — is the last institution that could be a factor .
Here ’ s how Trump ’ s defenders in Congress may take a final shot at subverting the election , who might carry Trump ’ s mantle and why it ’ s almost certain to be more of a spectacle than a solution for Trump .
The framers declared that the presidential election isn ’ t official until lawmakers certify the winner .
The voters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ electors for Biden and 232 for Trump .
Those electors will cast their formal votes for president on Dec. 14 .
An obscure 1887 law called the Electoral Count Act , and several subsequent updates , spell out the process , setting Jan. 6 after a presidential election as the official certification date and outlining vague , complicated procedures .
On that day , the House and Senate meet in a joint session at 1 p.m. — just three days after a newly constituted Congress is sworn in .
One of their first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the Electoral College vote .
That same federal law also gives a tiny number of lawmakers enormous power to challenge the results .
If a single House member and a single senator join forces , they can object to entire slates of presidential electors .
They must do so in writing and provide an explanation , though there are no guidelines on how detailed it must be .
If they do , the House and Senate must retreat to their chambers and debate the outcome for up to two hours before voting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s electors are certified separately , meaning lawmakers bent on challenging the results have multiple chances to force lengthy delays .
If the Democrat-run House and GOP-controlled Senate disagree ?
That outcome has never been tested before , though it would likely give governors in key states — including the Democrats who lead Pennsylvania , Wisconsin and Michigan — a larger role .
There have been whispers of the Electoral Count Act .
However , it appears that most mainstream media members are refusing to cover the possibility .
The New York Times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump ’ s last-ditch efforts to reverse the election seem to come down to a far-fetched scenario , one in which Republican-led state legislatures choose the members of the Electoral College , overturning the will of voters .
Could it work ?
Election law experts are highly skeptical .
And leaders of the Republican majorities in legislatures in key states , including Pennsylvania , Michigan , Arizona and Georgia , told The New York Times this week through their offices that they saw no role for themselves in picking electors .
That has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ president , including the talk radio host Mark Levin and Gov .
Ron DeSantis of Florida , from suggesting that Republican-led legislatures should consider ignoring the popular vote in close-fought states won by President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. and handing their electoral votes to Mr. Trump .
This political gambit , to the degree that it ’ s an organized strategy at all , has a theoretical basis in law , according to experts .
But if it were to proceed , it could cause widespread outrage and be seen as an attempt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ginsberg , until recently one of the Republican Party ’ s top elections lawyers , called the strategy an act of desperation , one that many Republican lawmakers would not buy into .
“ The most partisan Trump legislators might , but I believe enough would rebel at hijacking their constituents ’ votes that such actions would fail , ” he said .
Here ’ s how such a scheme would theoretically play out .
The Constitution gives state legislatures the power to determine the “ manner ” in which electors are appointed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 538 people who formally choose the president .
Every state has already done that , by specifying in its laws that the winner of the statewide popular vote is entitled to the state ’ s presidential electors ( Maine and Nebraska apportion some electors by congressional district ) .
The Electoral Count Act , a 19th-century law , sets up the mechanism for how that takes place .
It directs governors to certify both the election results and a slate of presidential electors to represent the will of the people .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the party of the presidential candidate who won their state .
The Electoral Count Act also says that in the event of “ failed elections , ” in which voters have not made a choice for president , state legislatures are empowered to step in and appoint electors .
The 1876 law is ambiguous about what constitutes a “ failed ” election .
But the law does contain a deadline for states to certify elections : the “ safe harbor ” date , which this year is Dec. 8 .
Electors chosen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Congress .
A flurry of lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign , most of which have been defeated in court , appear aimed at slowing down states ’ certification timelines and possibly providing a pretext to declare a “ failed ” election .
Time will tell whether this will happen .
PRAYER CHAIN FOR TRUMP : Please add your name and a prayer to support our President !
Hopefully it doesn ’ t get to the Electoral Count Act .
We hope that state legislatures resolve this issue , especially with all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s also the possibility of lawsuits moving forward .
But if worst comes to worst , then the Electoral Count Act is there as a final safety measure !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
22,845 views
What happens if the Trump campaign’s lawsuits fail in court?
What happens if the Supreme Court refuses to hear any of the appeals?
What happens if a contingent election in Congress doesn’t happen?
Is it over?
Or is there still a path to re-inauguration for President Trump.
No matter what the media says, this race isn’t over.
This obscure law could be Trump’s final gambit to rightfully claim the presidency.
It is called the Electoral Count Act.
The concept is simple.
In fact, the Democrats tried it in 2017 and 2001 after the 2016 and 2000 elections.
Obviously, Democrats failed.
But with widespread allegations of voter fraud and data irregularities, President Trump could succeed with this route.
In short, Congress must certify the election results after each state certifies its results.
But the certification process can be challenged.
It just takes 1 member from the House of Representatives and 1 Senator to join forces.
Together, they can challenge the electors from any state, forcing a debate on the House floors.
YouTuber StateOfDaniel explains more. The relevant section starts around the 29 minute mark:
https://youtu.be/0KEh2Zsflmo?t=1749
Even Politico has started reporting on the story.
There are multiple allies on Capitol Hill who are willing to fight for President Trump.
Politico explains:
President Donald Trump’s arsenal for overturning the election will soon be down to one final, desperate maneuver: pressing his Republican allies on Capitol Hill to step in and derail Joe Biden’s presidency. Although the Electoral College casts the official vote for president on Dec. 14, it’s up to Congress to certify the results a few weeks later. And federal law gives individual members of the House and Senate the power to challenge the results from the floor — a rarely used mechanism meant to be the last of all last resorts to safeguard an election. But several House Republican lawmakers and aides now tell POLITICO they’re considering this option to aid Trump’s quest. “Nothing is off the table,” said Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.). Gaetz pointed out that in January 2017, a handful of House Democrats took this precise procedural step before their efforts flamed out during a joint session of Congress presided over by none other than Biden, then the outgoing vice president. “It is over,” Biden said at the time, gaveling down Democrats as Republicans cheered. This time, Vice President Mike Pence will be in the chair for any potential challenges — a potentially awkward scenario as his boss continues to deny the reality of the election he lost. Indeed, Trump lost the election. His legal battles have failed to stop states from certifying his defeat. And his bid to pressure state legislators to overturn Biden’s victory appears to be going nowhere. Congress — where Republicans are still largely in lockstep with Trump — is the last institution that could be a factor. Here’s how Trump’s defenders in Congress may take a final shot at subverting the election, who might carry Trump’s mantle and why it’s almost certain to be more of a spectacle than a solution for Trump. The framers declared that the presidential election isn’t official until lawmakers certify the winner. The voters, on Nov. 3, picked 306 electors for Biden and 232 for Trump. Those electors will cast their formal votes for president on Dec. 14. An obscure 1887 law called the Electoral Count Act, and several subsequent updates, spell out the process, setting Jan. 6 after a presidential election as the official certification date and outlining vague, complicated procedures. On that day, the House and Senate meet in a joint session at 1 p.m. — just three days after a newly constituted Congress is sworn in. One of their first orders of business is to pass judgment on the Electoral College vote. That same federal law also gives a tiny number of lawmakers enormous power to challenge the results. If a single House member and a single senator join forces, they can object to entire slates of presidential electors. They must do so in writing and provide an explanation, though there are no guidelines on how detailed it must be. If they do, the House and Senate must retreat to their chambers and debate the outcome for up to two hours before voting on the matter. Each state’s electors are certified separately, meaning lawmakers bent on challenging the results have multiple chances to force lengthy delays. If the Democrat-run House and GOP-controlled Senate disagree? That outcome has never been tested before, though it would likely give governors in key states — including the Democrats who lead Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan — a larger role.
There have been whispers of the Electoral Count Act.
However, it appears that most mainstream media members are refusing to cover the possibility.
Any concerns about The Electoral Count Act if 1887?? https://t.co/uA7VAVbqN0 — trudy wonder (@tru_wonder) November 26, 2020
It's never happened but the Electoral Count Act of 1887 allows state legislators to give electoral votes to the candidate they want instead of the winner. Trump was talking with MI and PA legislators. No confirmation in 5 weeks that law can apply. It's asinine but true! — Benji (@NealGoodman8) November 26, 2020
It’s not just Politico.
The New York Times confirms this is a possibility:
President Trump’s last-ditch efforts to reverse the election seem to come down to a far-fetched scenario, one in which Republican-led state legislatures choose the members of the Electoral College, overturning the will of voters. Could it work? Election law experts are highly skeptical. And leaders of the Republican majorities in legislatures in key states, including Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona and Georgia, told The New York Times this week through their offices that they saw no role for themselves in picking electors. That has not stopped some high-profile supporters of the president, including the talk radio host Mark Levin and Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, from suggesting that Republican-led legislatures should consider ignoring the popular vote in close-fought states won by President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. and handing their electoral votes to Mr. Trump. This political gambit, to the degree that it’s an organized strategy at all, has a theoretical basis in law, according to experts. But if it were to proceed, it could cause widespread outrage and be seen as an attempt to subvert the democratic process. Benjamin Ginsberg, until recently one of the Republican Party’s top elections lawyers, called the strategy an act of desperation, one that many Republican lawmakers would not buy into. “The most partisan Trump legislators might, but I believe enough would rebel at hijacking their constituents’ votes that such actions would fail,” he said. Here’s how such a scheme would theoretically play out. The Constitution gives state legislatures the power to determine the “manner” in which electors are appointed to the Electoral College, the body of 538 people who formally choose the president. Every state has already done that, by specifying in its laws that the winner of the statewide popular vote is entitled to the state’s presidential electors (Maine and Nebraska apportion some electors by congressional district). The Electoral Count Act, a 19th-century law, sets up the mechanism for how that takes place. It directs governors to certify both the election results and a slate of presidential electors to represent the will of the people. In general practice, governors certify electors chosen by the party of the presidential candidate who won their state. The Electoral Count Act also says that in the event of “failed elections,” in which voters have not made a choice for president, state legislatures are empowered to step in and appoint electors. The 1876 law is ambiguous about what constitutes a “failed” election. But the law does contain a deadline for states to certify elections: the “safe harbor” date, which this year is Dec. 8. Electors chosen before that date cannot be challenged by Congress. Try An "Extreme Altitude Wine" ... From Patriot Wines A flurry of lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign, most of which have been defeated in court, appear aimed at slowing down states’ certification timelines and possibly providing a pretext to declare a “failed” election.
Time will tell whether this will happen.
Hopefully it doesn’t get to the Electoral Count Act.
We hope that state legislatures resolve this issue, especially with all the evidence coming out.
There’s also the possibility of lawsuits moving forward.
But if worst comes to worst, then the Electoral Count Act is there as a final safety measure!


welovetrump--2020-12-05--Nevada and Arizona Native Americans Were Given Gift Cards, Jewelry and Electronics By Democrat Opera

Nevada and Arizona Native Americans Were Given Gift Cards, Jewelry and Electronics By Democrat Operatives In Exchange For Votes For Biden

Bribery is usually hidden but Democrat operatives in Nevada showcased their deeds right on social media .
Native American leaders working with the Biden campaign offered tribal members and Visa gift cards ranging from $ 25- $ 500 , jewelry , and other items in exchange for turning in your ballot in Nevada .
The Trump campaign reported that they “ have discovered that groups claiming to support the Native American community ’ s voice at the polls have engaged in blatantly illegal bribery ” and will present their evidence in court .
The Nevada Native Vote Project posted these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them down : The Washington Examiner covered the story and added these details : Key Native American leaders working with the Biden campaign offered tribal members and associates Visa gift cards , jewelry , and other “ swag ” to vote in the presidential election , according to several videos being used by the Trump campaign ’ s effort to challenge Nevada ’ s vote .
In one long video , officials from the Reno-Sparks Indian Colony are shown offering a raffle for gift cards in values of $ 25 , $ 100 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to those who can prove they voted .
Other gifts for voting include bracelets , necklaces , earrings , T-shirts , and masks .
“ If you come here to vote or if you voted already , RSIC is having a raffle , ” said RSIC spokeswoman Bethany Sam in one of the videos .
In the same video , she is shown wearing a Biden-Harris anti-virus mask and in front of the Biden-Harris campaign bus .
The Trump campaign is expected to present the videos today in a Carson City court as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ votes to overturn the state ’ s election of Joe Biden .
The Gateway Pundit covered the story exclusively and added these details : Native Americans in Arizona were provided with electronics , resort stays and monetary gifts in exchange for registering to vote or actually voting at events that were also promoting Joe Biden Any monetary exchange for votes , whether partisan or not , is illegal .
As the Gateway Pundit previously reported , the Nevada Native Vote Project used gift cards , electronics and other gifts to bribe Native Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Biden and Mark Kelly signs were prominently displayed during events offering giveaways .
The Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona were treated to giveaways of resort stays , golf outings , FitBits , tablets , televisions , soundbars and more on September 22 .
NATIONAL POLL : Should Obama Be Arrested and Tried For Treason ?
The National File reported the same groups that were bribing Native Americans to vote were partially funded by liberal globalist George Soros .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
1,237 views
Bribery is usually hidden but Democrat operatives in Nevada showcased their deeds right on social media.
Native American leaders working with the Biden campaign offered tribal members and Visa gift cards ranging from $25-$500, jewelry, and other items in exchange for turning in your ballot in Nevada.
The Trump campaign reported that they “have discovered that groups claiming to support the Native American community’s voice at the polls have engaged in blatantly illegal bribery” and will present their evidence in court.
Key Native American leaders working with the @JoeBiden's campaign offered tribal members and associates Visa gift cards, jewelry and other “swag” to vote.https://t.co/tTYQm94yDc — Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) December 4, 2020
The Nevada Native Vote Project posted these pictures on their Facebook page before taking them down:
The Washington Examiner covered the story and added these details:
Key Native American leaders working with the Biden campaign offered tribal members and associates Visa gift cards, jewelry, and other “swag” to vote in the presidential election, according to several videos being used by the Trump campaign’s effort to challenge Nevada’s vote. In one long video, officials from the Reno-Sparks Indian Colony are shown offering a raffle for gift cards in values of $25, $100, $250, and $500 to those who can prove they voted. Other gifts for voting include bracelets, necklaces, earrings, T-shirts, and masks. “If you come here to vote or if you voted already, RSIC is having a raffle,” said RSIC spokeswoman Bethany Sam in one of the videos. In the same video, she is shown wearing a Biden-Harris anti-virus mask and in front of the Biden-Harris campaign bus. The Trump campaign is expected to present the videos today in a Carson City court as it presses its case to challenge enough votes to overturn the state’s election of Joe Biden.
The Gateway Pundit covered the story exclusively and added these details:
Native Americans in Arizona were provided with electronics, resort stays and monetary gifts in exchange for registering to vote or actually voting at events that were also promoting Joe Biden Any monetary exchange for votes, whether partisan or not, is illegal. As the Gateway Pundit previously reported, the Nevada Native Vote Project used gift cards, electronics and other gifts to bribe Native Americans to register to vote. In Arizona, Biden and Mark Kelly signs were prominently displayed during events offering giveaways. SIGN THE PETITION: Release The Epstein Client List! The Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona were treated to giveaways of resort stays, golf outings, FitBits, tablets, televisions, soundbars and more on September 22.
EXCLUSIVE: Native American Voter Bribe Efforts Were Partially Funded By Soros and Government Agencies — Powered By Act Blue https://t.co/taZFXsp3KC — Chuck Woolery (@chuckwoolery) November 30, 2020
US gov't Deep State depts & agencies bribed Native Americans in several states to get them to vote for Joe Biden. Native Americans were given TVs, gift cards, electronics, goodie bags full of merchandise & resort starys for promising to vote for Biden.https://t.co/0sa0u4oDAm — Cheri Berens (@Cheri_Berens) December 1, 2020
The National File reported the same groups that were bribing Native Americans to vote were partially funded by liberal globalist George Soros.
No surprise there.


welovetrump--2020-12-05--Michigan Deep State Democrat Gets His Ass Handed To Him By Patriotic Woman Whistleblower

This guy just got torn a new asshole .
And I ’ m sorry to anyone who doesn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ I wish I could rip him a third one .
This Swamp Rat Deep State @ @ @ @ @ possible question : “ why aren ’ t more witnesses coming forward to talk about @ @ @ @ @ First of all you fat , unkempt bastard , hundreds if not thousands are coming @ @ @ @ @ you living on ?
But if that question somehow actually deserved a response , he @ @ @ @ @ this woman who ripped him a new one .
This is not a game .
@ @ @ @ @ lives and their families on the line to save our country .
I give this @ @ @ @ @ this is absolutely the PERFECT response .
NATIONAL POLL : Are You Happy Melania Replaced @ @ @ @ @ And one more here :

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
18,031 views
This guy just got torn a new asshole.
And I’m sorry to anyone who doesn’t like that language, but I wish I could rip him a third one.
This Swamp Rat Deep State Creator just asked the dumbest possible question: “why aren’t more witnesses coming forward to talk about fraud they saw?”
First of all you fat, unkempt bastard, hundreds if not thousands are coming forward!
What planet are you living on?
But if that question somehow actually deserved a response, he got the perfect one from this woman who ripped him a new one.
This is not a game.
These are people’s lives.
These are people putting their lives and their families on the line to save our country.
I give this woman a standing ovation, this is absolutely the PERFECT response.
Please enjoy:
https://twitter.com/MajorPatriot/status/1334303711208894464
And one more here:


welovetrump--2020-12-05--WATCH As Witness In Michigan Explains How She Was Instructed to Backdate Absentee Ballots!

All across the country !
Hundreds of them , if not thousands !
Oh , and these are real eyewitness @ @ @ @ @ “ hearsay fake whistleblowers ” that the Media slobbered all over in the impeachment hearings @ @ @ @ @ difference ?
An eyewitness testifies about what THEY actually saw or heard .
A “ @ @ @ @ @ term I had never even heard of before because it really doesn ’ t exist @ @ @ @ @ person saying “ I heard someone else saw or heard this.
” NATIONAL POLL : @ @ @ @ @ Tried For Treason ?
Well , this is the real deal folks .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
4,283 views
The eyewitness whistleblowers are coming forward.
All across the country!
In all 5 disputed swing states!
Hundreds of them, if not thousands!
Oh, and these are real eyewitness testimony whistleblowers, not the “hearsay fake whistleblowers” that the Media slobbered all over in the impeachment hearings.
Do you know the difference?
An eyewitness testifies about what THEY actually saw or heard.
A “hearsay whistleblower” is a term I had never even heard of before because it really doesn’t exist.
It’s a person saying “I heard someone else saw or heard this.”
It’s completely bogus.
Well, this is the real deal folks.
Watch:
https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1334285711994998784


welovetrump--2020-12-05--Here’s What The Insurrection Act Really Means and Why Martial Law Is The Only Way [From Noah]

Ok folks , this is a very special article .
A few days ago I ran a poll asking if you think President Trump should declare the Insurrection Act and implement Martial Law to save the election and the country .
NATIONAL POLL : Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now ?
Thousands of you voted and here are the results ( wow ! )
: But more than that , I received HUNDREDS of emails asking “ what is the Insurrection Act ?
” And what Martial Law really means .
There is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those topics and since I can ’ t reply to every email when there are literally hundreds , I wrote this article .
I was researching and trying to find the best way to explain it to you and then I came across this solid gold .
This is a thread from Q that explains exactly what all of this means and why this is the only way out .
It ’ s so good you ’ re probably going to want to bookmark this article and show your family and friends .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ follow but trust me , just tread through it in order and it will ALL make sense .
14\ The Trump legal team , along with Sidney Powell and the white hats all know that these legal issues will end up in front of SCOTUS .
They are using this time now in the lower courts to build their cases and spread the information ( as much of it as they can ) far and wide .
22\ So what does this mean for we Patriots right now ?
Do we sit back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stand and we fight !
We continue protesting and shouting and calling our reps to support each other .
We share the truth of the evidence far and wide .
We push back against the MSM narrative .
You can read the full thread here .
And if you ’ re more of a visual learner , you can listen to my friend Daniel break it all down here : BOOKMARK IT : Check Out My New Site , NoahReport.com !
Before you go , please vote in my poll now that you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
269,806 views
Ok folks, this is a very special article.
A few days ago I ran a poll asking if you think President Trump should declare the Insurrection Act and implement Martial Law to save the election and the country.
NATIONAL POLL: Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now?
Thousands of you voted and here are the results (wow!):
But more than that, I received HUNDREDS of emails asking “what is the Insurrection Act?”
And what Martial Law really means.
There is a ton of confusion out there about those topics and since I can’t reply to every email when there are literally hundreds, I wrote this article.
I was researching and trying to find the best way to explain it to you and then I came across this solid gold.
This is a thread from Q that explains exactly what all of this means and why this is the only way out.
It’s so good you’re probably going to want to bookmark this article and show your family and friends.
The formatting is a little hard to follow but trust me, just tread through it in order and it will ALL make sense.
Enjoy:
1\ As we’ve been watching the hearings on election fraud in these contested states, I keep thinking about the phrase “The military is the only way.” There are several related drops, but D36 stands out to me. Everything is so corrupt, there is no other way than the military.
2\ If the military is the only way, tho, why bother with lawsuits and fights with the MSM? Why not just invoke the Insurrection Act and take down these traitors? Because the people won’t accept it. They must first see it for themselves.
3\ Before Nov 3rd, most people still believed the elections were mostly fair and honest. Minor attempts at fraud existed, sure, but nothing like widespread national vote rigging. That fairytale has since been thoroughly and completely shattered these last several weeks.
4\ This mass blackpilling of people concerning our elections reminds me of another drop we saw a lot of during the riots and violence just a couple short months ago: D4461. Did you think “you must show them” was only about the riots?
5\ We all had to be shown just how thoroughly corrupt our elections had become and just how deep that corruption had spread. We all know there is corruption in D.C., but we also had to see the corruption at the state and local levels too. Even Republicans were in on it.
6\ Evidence was collected and lawsuits were filed, only for us to run into yet another level of corruption: the courts. Anons already know the level of corruption in these courts with activist judges running cover for the [DS]. But most others still needed to see it.
7\ We’ve seen flagrantly asinine rulings from these judges, and obviously biased refusals to even consider the evidence in some cases. Here and there a normal judge appears, but they are almost always overruled by corrupted higher courts.
8\ All along this time, we’ve also been witnessing yet another level of corruption in the mainstream media (MSM). The full on suppression and refusal to cover any of these lawsuits fairly and accurately to keep the info from the people is criminal. Even Fox News has thrown in.
9\ And joining their more traditional MSM brethren, are the Big Tech tyrants, who happily label anything speaking honestly and factually as ‘disputed’. They’re also quite happy in outright suspending or banning accounts that get a little too close to the truth.
10\ In an effort to combat these corrupt and fraudulent acts, we reach out to our corrupted DOJ and FBI for assistance in restraining these bad actors, and are responded to with silence. It’s as if these agencies are also in on the fraud and do not want to get involved.
11\ Every step of the way, we are met with fierce opposition and resistance. Integrity has no bearing and truth does not matter. We are like Sisyphus, forever pushing the same infinitely heavy boulder up the same insurmountable hill.
12\ We hold hearings with republican reps and senators from state legislatures presenting the evidence we’ve collected of widespread fraud. Afterward, they’re fully engaged, but there’s only so many of them and the remaining legislature doesn’t want the fight.
13\ Unfortunately, the state legislatures will most likely fail at their attempts to reclaim the electoral power. But this is known and expected. Why pursue it then, along with these hearings? Because WTP and these legislatures need to know the truth being kept from them.
14\ The Trump legal team, along with Sidney Powell and the white hats all know that these legal issues will end up in front of SCOTUS. They are using this time now in the lower courts to build their cases and spread the information (as much of it as they can) far and wide.
15\ The MAGA legal team needs to have the people and the state legislatures on board when the real hammer drops after SCOTUS rules in favor of Trump. Do you think Soros, et al. and the [DS] will simply accept a SCOTUS ruling that awards Trump his rightfully earned second term?
16\ The [DS] and the Soros bunch, along with the MSM, will cry bloody murder when the SCOTUS ruling drops. They will not accept it. They will blame ACB and refuse to concede. The riots will start again. The fires, the looting, the violence. The WH will be surrounded.
17\ The [DS] will have their ghoulish black bloc brigades thoroughly convinced the election was stolen by Trump and that they need to remove him by force. Tensions will rise until the hoards overrun the WH grounds and attempt to remove the POTUS, who will be absent.
18\ It is around this time we will get the message via Twitter: “My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us.” and the Insurrection Act will be finally invoked. The military and federalized NG will restore order to the streets, and will conduct all investigations into the fraud.
19\ What evidence do you think they’ll use to conduct these investigations? Possibly all the evidence being collected now and being displayed for all to see in these hearings? Would they add more of their own evidence? Treason will be declared and perp walks will begin.
20\ If you don’t think POTUS has these authorities under the Insurrection Act, I’d refer you to D11, where the authority is directly implied.
21\ So we’re just waiting on the SCOTUS rulings and the invocation of the Insurrection Act. That’s what all this is leading up to. POTUS and white hats had to show the people the truth and that all options to correct the fraud had been expended before invoking the Act, however.
22\ So what does this mean for we Patriots right now? Do we sit back and do nothing? No. We stand and we fight! We continue protesting and shouting and calling our reps to support each other. We share the truth of the evidence far and wide. We push back against the MSM narrative.
23\ We must let our supportive reps know that we stand with them, and we must let other Patriots know they are not alone. Do not hang your head when the “losses” come for we knew they would. They must to prove the necessity of the actions to be taken later.
24\ Stand tall, Patriot, knowing your voice will be heard. Stand tall, Patriot, knowing the truth will be shown. Stand tall, Patriot, knowing the corruption is nearing its end. This is not another 4-year election. No war. No civil unrest. Clean and swift. God wins.
You can read the full thread here.
And if you’re more of a visual learner, you can listen to my friend Daniel break it all down here:
Before you go, please vote in my poll now that you know what it means!
Vote here….👇
NATIONAL POLL: Should President Trump Use The Insurrection Act and Declare Martial Law Right Now?


welovetrump--2020-12-04--Biden Seems To Have No Plan, Says People Should “Wear A Mask For 100 Days”

Folks let me ask you something Have most people been wearing masks these last three months ?
Where I am @ @ @ @ @ “ Yes ” and I am guessing that you can too .
In fact , @ @ @ @ @ I can tell have been wearing masks since the start of the pandemic .
So @ @ @ @ @ proposal that people wear maks for the first 100 days of his administration so revolutionary @

Folks let me ask you something
Have most people been wearing masks these last three months?
Where I am, I can definetly answer “Yes” and I am guessing that you can too.
In fact, most people, from what I can tell have been wearing masks since the start of the pandemic.
So what makes Biden’s proposal that people wear maks for the first 100 days of his administration so revolutionary?
Absolutely nothing.
Check it out: