welovetrump--2020-12-28--Are You Still Watching? FOX News and Tucker Carlson Now Losing to Rachel Maddow, Cuomo, and Wolf Bli

Are You Still Watching? FOX News and Tucker Carlson Now Losing to Rachel Maddow, Cuomo, and Wolf Blitzer in the Ratings!

Oh… how the mighty have fallen !
For DECADES… literally decades… Fox News was undeniably the # 1 name in news .
They had more viewers than CNN , MSNBC , and the rest of their competitors .
It was never even close .
But ever since Fox News appeared to backstab President Trump on election night , their ratings are down the toilet .
If any of the “ establishment ” politicians think that they can “ return to normal ” with Biden , Fox News ’ ratings should be the warning sign that this movement is bigger than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ News ’ ratings struggles below : So where are Fox News viewers going ?
Obviously , they ’ re turning to online sources such as WeLoveTrump !
But they ’ re also going to TV alternatives like Newsmax and One America News .
USA Today confirms that Newsmax is gaining BIG LEAGUE on Fox : A surge of post-election momentum for pro-Trump networks suggests that Fox News ’ status as the primary cable news destination of far-right conservative viewers may not be as solid as previously thought .
But it ’ s unclear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ One America News ( OAN ) is sustainable – and experts question whether those networks can lure the type of advertisers that have enriched Fox News .
In the period leading up to the election and in the weeks thereafter , Newsmax and OAN have attracted a growing audience of far-right conservatives by amplifying President Donald Trump ’ s false declaration of victory and his unfounded accusations of election fraud .
Newsmax , the larger of the two , appears to have made a dent in Fox News ’ ratings since then , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Bea Quirk , a 76-year-old retiree from Colonial Beach , Virginia , said she switched from Fox News to Newsmax after Fox News “ pushed Trump aside ” by declaring Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election .
“ I have watched Fox News since long before Trump walked down the aisle , ” she said .
“ I ’ m a Trump fan .
I don ’ t like the way he was treated.
” In the last full week before the election , primetime ratings for Fox News @ @ @ @ @ @ @ primetime ratings for Newsmax , according to ratings tracker Nielsen .
But in the first full week after the election , Fox News ’ lead had declined to less than nine times the ratings of Newsmax .
And by the week of Nov. 30 , the lead was down to less than seven times .
“ Fox News is being forced to actually compete for its audience for the first time in years , ” said Matt Gertz , senior fellow at Media Matters for America , a liberal watchdog group that closely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had more or less a monopoly over right-wing cable news and have been the focal point of the overall conservative media ecosystem for decades – and now they are needing to deal with competitors coming from the right and trying to take away some of their market share.
” To be sure , Fox News has remained the most-watched cable news network in primetime , also besting CNN and MSNBC despite recent growth for those networks .
But the momentum is undeniable for Newsmax , which averaged 401,000 viewers in primetime the week @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the week before the election and 233,000 the week of the election , according to Nielsen .
The surge for Newsmax in recent weeks even attracted the attention of “ Saturday Night Live , ” which spoofed the network in a skit about a sports channel that won ’ t acknowledge that the woeful New York Jets have ever lost a football game .
Fox News declined to comment for this story .
But Steve Tomsic , chief financial officer of Fox News owner Fox Corp. , recently told analysts and investors that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ loyalty ” with a broad base of support that extends beyond the primetime lineup to its daytime shows and an extensive online and TV newsgathering operation .
“ We don ’ t take lightly the potential for competition , whether it ’ s the existing sort of classic MSNBC or CNN , or the sort of emerging ones like Newsmax and OAN , ” Tomsic said at an investment conference , adding that “ we kind of welcome it because it sharpens us up and gives us a real focus.
” The only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and consistently covered the accusations of voter fraud is Sean Hannity .
Other hosts have appeared to scoff at the idea .
And Tucker Carlson even infamously appeared to mock Sidney Powell .
That certainly did not sit well with the Trump base .
So why are former Fox News loyalists switching to alternative sources for information ?
The Washington Post attempted to dissect the dynamic : On the morning after Election Day , Greg and Jenny Brethen , loyal viewers of Fox News who watched the channel religiously for almost 20 years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ Fox & Friends , ” and thought they saw something fishy .
The Tennessee couple sensed that their favorite Fox personalities , weekday co-host Brian Kilmeade and weekend co-host Pete Hegseth , who appeared in a segment , were holding back .
“ Like they were both instructed to keep their mouth shut , that ’ s how I felt , ” Jenny said .
The previous evening , the nonpartisan Fox News Decision Desk was the first network prognosticator to call the state of Arizona for Joe Biden , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but ultimately held up .
On Nov. 7 , the network called the election for the former vice president , although Hegseth won ’ t call him the president-elect and Kilmeade has qualified his presidency with an uncertain “ if.
” Whatever it was , Greg said the couple “ felt duped.
” At that moment , they decided to stop watching Fox News forever and look for an alternative .
After hearing about the conservative upstart Newsmax during a pro-Trump rally , they chose to give the channel a shot .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jenny , 46 , said in a recent phone interview .
“ We ’ re not going back .
Once you do something like that , you ’ re done in our book.
” Jenny , who said she now watches Newsmax from the time she gets up to the time she goes to bed , was among the 15 longtime Fox News loyalists who spoke with The Post in depth about why they have flipped the channel to Newsmax in recent weeks and months .
Their stories lend texture to what has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people who watch Newsmax , a much-smaller , would-be competitor network that has seen a dramatic uptick in viewers in the weeks since the election by capitalizing on conservative frustration with Fox , and , some say , a desire from President Trump ’ s fans to keep alive the flailing narrative that he will ultimately serve a second term , despite Biden ’ s coming inauguration .
Although Trump has criticized Fox ’ s news division and encouraged his followers to flip the channel to Newsmax or One America News , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump supporters , said they learned of Newsmax from word-of-mouth or from online research .
“ I jumped on it and haven ’ t looked back , ” said 40-year-old technical engineer Jeremy Arant , who was introduced to Newsmax by his friends after the election .
Newsmax stunned industry observers when host Greg Kelly ’ s 7 p.m. show beat Fox ’ s 7 p.m. show , hosted by anchor Martha MacCallum , among viewers between the age of 25 and 54 on Dec. 7 — though it has not repeated the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before the election and a post-election period , between Nov. 9 and Dec. 17 , Kelly ’ s show has experienced a 486 percent increase in viewership ( up an average of 667,000 viewers ) , while McCallum ’ s show has declined by 44 percent , or down an average of about 1.4 million total viewers , according to Nielsen data .
McCallum ’ s “ The Story ” program still has a big lead over “ Greg Kelly Reports , ” however .
Comparing Newsmax ’ s weekday performance between 4 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s , though , Newsmax has experienced a 497 percent viewership increase — during the post-election period , but excluding Thanksgiving — while Fox has experienced a 38 percent decline .
( In the most recently measurable week , however , Newsmax was down from its post-election ratings highs in mid-November . )
While Fox called the election for Biden shortly after the rest of the mainstream media did so , Newsmax waited 37 additional days , only adopting the president-elect moniker after the electoral college confirmed his victory on Dec. 14 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Newsmax ’ s biggest star , a bomb-thrower in the mold of Fox News star Sean Hannity , doesn ’ t agree with the decision .
Kelly acknowledged that some of his colleagues have referred to Biden as president-elect , but said recently , “ I personally feel they ’ re wrong.
” “ The night of the election completely did it .
I haven ’ t turned on Fox News since , ” said Jami Salamida , 43 , a paralegal who lives in West Virginia .
She watched Fox for two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eight and 10 hours of Newsmax each day .
This should be a warning to any Republican Senators and House representatives who don ’ t intend on fighting for President Trump on January 6 .
We are your base !
You are supposed to represent WE THE PEOPLE !
President Trump has clearly UNITED the Republican voters together .
It ’ s time that our representatives finally began fighting for us !
NATIONAL POLL : Is CNN The Enemy Of The People ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
6,621 views
Oh… how the mighty have fallen!
For DECADES… literally decades… Fox News was undeniably the #1 name in news.
They had more viewers than CNN, MSNBC, and the rest of their competitors.
It was never even close.
But ever since Fox News appeared to backstab President Trump on election night, their ratings are down the toilet.
We’re not talking about a minor dip…
They’ve TANKED.
Big time.
If any of the “establishment” politicians think that they can “return to normal” with Biden, Fox News’ ratings should be the warning sign that this movement is bigger than you think.
More details on Fox News’ ratings struggles below:
Eric Bolling Says Employees At Fox News Are ‘Nervous’ About Drop In Ratings https://t.co/wTv0jej3By pic.twitter.com/Ek7Q6gAJqD — The Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) December 23, 2020
🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊
Fox News ratings have dropped by 40%, and they don’t know how to turn it around…. "Very, Very Nervous About It" — Former Host Says Fox News Is Tanking, Lost 40% Of Audience https://t.co/iT6tGyxRRo — Andrew C ™ (@Sheckyi) December 22, 2020
Attention ALL REPUBLICANS take a look at the FOX NEWS ratings. We can and will do to you what we did to Fox news if you do not get on board and start fighting for President Trump. This will be your last year in office I PROMISE. — Robert Philmore (@PhilmoreRobert) December 24, 2020
I love watching Fox News's ratings tank. They deserve every bit of this and more for what they did to President Trump and their viewers. — C3 (@C_3C_3) December 22, 2020
https://twitter.com/PamelaGeller/status/1342530937322496002
So where are Fox News viewers going?
Obviously, they’re turning to online sources such as WeLoveTrump!
But they’re also going to TV alternatives like Newsmax and One America News.
USA Today confirms that Newsmax is gaining BIG LEAGUE on Fox:
A surge of post-election momentum for pro-Trump networks suggests that Fox News’ status as the primary cable news destination of far-right conservative viewers may not be as solid as previously thought. But it’s unclear whether recent audience growth for Newsmax and One America News (OAN) is sustainable – and experts question whether those networks can lure the type of advertisers that have enriched Fox News. In the period leading up to the election and in the weeks thereafter, Newsmax and OAN have attracted a growing audience of far-right conservatives by amplifying President Donald Trump’s false declaration of victory and his unfounded accusations of election fraud. Newsmax, the larger of the two, appears to have made a dent in Fox News’ ratings since then, although Fox News remains the far-and-away leader. Bea Quirk, a 76-year-old retiree from Colonial Beach, Virginia, said she switched from Fox News to Newsmax after Fox News “pushed Trump aside” by declaring Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election. “I have watched Fox News since long before Trump walked down the aisle,” she said. “I’m a Trump fan. I don’t like the way he was treated.” In the last full week before the election, primetime ratings for Fox News were more than 90 times greater than primetime ratings for Newsmax, according to ratings tracker Nielsen. But in the first full week after the election, Fox News’ lead had declined to less than nine times the ratings of Newsmax. And by the week of Nov. 30, the lead was down to less than seven times. “Fox News is being forced to actually compete for its audience for the first time in years,” said Matt Gertz, senior fellow at Media Matters for America, a liberal watchdog group that closely tracks cable news. “They have had more or less a monopoly over right-wing cable news and have been the focal point of the overall conservative media ecosystem for decades – and now they are needing to deal with competitors coming from the right and trying to take away some of their market share.” To be sure, Fox News has remained the most-watched cable news network in primetime, also besting CNN and MSNBC despite recent growth for those networks. But the momentum is undeniable for Newsmax, which averaged 401,000 viewers in primetime the week of Nov. 30, compared with 57,000 the week before the election and 233,000 the week of the election, according to Nielsen. The surge for Newsmax in recent weeks even attracted the attention of “Saturday Night Live,” which spoofed the network in a skit about a sports channel that won’t acknowledge that the woeful New York Jets have ever lost a football game. Fox News declined to comment for this story. But Steve Tomsic, chief financial officer of Fox News owner Fox Corp., recently told analysts and investors that the network “has got amazing brand loyalty” with a broad base of support that extends beyond the primetime lineup to its daytime shows and an extensive online and TV newsgathering operation. “We don’t take lightly the potential for competition, whether it’s the existing sort of classic MSNBC or CNN, or the sort of emerging ones like Newsmax and OAN,” Tomsic said at an investment conference, adding that “we kind of welcome it because it sharpens us up and gives us a real focus.”
The only Fox News host that has seriously covered and consistently covered the accusations of voter fraud is Sean Hannity.
Other hosts have appeared to scoff at the idea.
And Tucker Carlson even infamously appeared to mock Sidney Powell.
That certainly did not sit well with the Trump base.
And it’s showing in Fox’s ratings.
Ratings are in and they are bad for FOX.https://t.co/wkimUiDHmN — David J Harris Jr (@DavidJHarrisJr) December 27, 2020
So why are former Fox News loyalists switching to alternative sources for information?
The Washington Post attempted to dissect the dynamic:
On the morning after Election Day, Greg and Jenny Brethen, loyal viewers of Fox News who watched the channel religiously for almost 20 years, turned on their go-to morning show, “Fox & Friends,” and thought they saw something fishy. The Tennessee couple sensed that their favorite Fox personalities, weekday co-host Brian Kilmeade and weekend co-host Pete Hegseth, who appeared in a segment, were holding back. “Like they were both instructed to keep their mouth shut, that’s how I felt,” Jenny said. The previous evening, the nonpartisan Fox News Decision Desk was the first network prognosticator to call the state of Arizona for Joe Biden, a call that to some was early — but ultimately held up. On Nov. 7, the network called the election for the former vice president, although Hegseth won’t call him the president-elect and Kilmeade has qualified his presidency with an uncertain “if.” Whatever it was, Greg said the couple “felt duped.” At that moment, they decided to stop watching Fox News forever and look for an alternative. After hearing about the conservative upstart Newsmax during a pro-Trump rally, they chose to give the channel a shot. “We’re permanently switched,” Jenny, 46, said in a recent phone interview. “We’re not going back. Once you do something like that, you’re done in our book.” Jenny, who said she now watches Newsmax from the time she gets up to the time she goes to bed, was among the 15 longtime Fox News loyalists who spoke with The Post in depth about why they have flipped the channel to Newsmax in recent weeks and months. Their stories lend texture to what has been a quantifiable shift in the number of people who watch Newsmax, a much-smaller, would-be competitor network that has seen a dramatic uptick in viewers in the weeks since the election by capitalizing on conservative frustration with Fox, and, some say, a desire from President Trump’s fans to keep alive the flailing narrative that he will ultimately serve a second term, despite Biden’s coming inauguration. Although Trump has criticized Fox’s news division and encouraged his followers to flip the channel to Newsmax or One America News, the majority of those interviewed, all Trump supporters, said they learned of Newsmax from word-of-mouth or from online research. “I jumped on it and haven’t looked back,” said 40-year-old technical engineer Jeremy Arant, who was introduced to Newsmax by his friends after the election. Newsmax stunned industry observers when host Greg Kelly’s 7 p.m. show beat Fox’s 7 p.m. show, hosted by anchor Martha MacCallum, among viewers between the age of 25 and 54 on Dec. 7 — though it has not repeated the feat. Still, comparing the month before the election and a post-election period, between Nov. 9 and Dec. 17, Kelly’s show has experienced a 486 percent increase in viewership (up an average of 667,000 viewers), while McCallum’s show has declined by 44 percent, or down an average of about 1.4 million total viewers, according to Nielsen data. McCallum’s “The Story” program still has a big lead over “Greg Kelly Reports,” however. Comparing Newsmax’s weekday performance between 4 p.m. and 8 p.m. to Fox’s, though, Newsmax has experienced a 497 percent viewership increase — during the post-election period, but excluding Thanksgiving — while Fox has experienced a 38 percent decline. (In the most recently measurable week, however, Newsmax was down from its post-election ratings highs in mid-November.) While Fox called the election for Biden shortly after the rest of the mainstream media did so, Newsmax waited 37 additional days, only adopting the president-elect moniker after the electoral college confirmed his victory on Dec. 14. But Kelly, who has emerged as Newsmax’s biggest star, a bomb-thrower in the mold of Fox News star Sean Hannity, doesn’t agree with the decision. Kelly acknowledged that some of his colleagues have referred to Biden as president-elect, but said recently, “I personally feel they’re wrong.” “The night of the election completely did it. I haven’t turned on Fox News since,” said Jami Salamida, 43, a paralegal who lives in West Virginia. She watched Fox for two decades and now said she watches between eight and 10 hours of Newsmax each day.
This should be a warning to any Republican Senators and House representatives who don’t intend on fighting for President Trump on January 6.
We are your base!
You are supposed to represent WE THE PEOPLE!
President Trump has clearly UNITED the Republican voters together.
It’s time that our representatives finally began fighting for us!
Eric Bolling has said that “Fox lost about 40% of their audience. 40%. That’s a big number.” In recent weeks, Fox has disputed such claims, pointing out that while some programs have dropped a third of their viewers since election night, they still atop the cable news ratings. pic.twitter.com/bpmpdp3rMp — Tony Caruso (@Caruso_tony) December 27, 2020
Look at what happened to the rest of the people on FOX all of their ratings have gone down dramatically, because they lie to the people instead of report on the actual news. — Dr. Dawn Michael💗 (@SexCounseling) December 24, 2020


welovetrump--2020-12-28--Here’s the Video Twitter Removed of a Nurse Allegedly Getting Facial Paralysis (Bell’s Palsy) from C

Here’s the Video Twitter Removed of a Nurse Allegedly Getting Facial Paralysis (Bell’s Palsy) from COVID Vaccine

A heartbreaking video is going viral on social media .
A nurse filmed herself getting the COVID-19 vaccine .
When she received the vaccine , she developed Bell ’ s Palsy .
For those not familiar with the medical term , Bell ’ s Palsy is facial paralysis .
That ’ s right : the Nashville nurse is no longer able to move one half of her face .
But the story gets worse .
The video was posted on Twitter to warn the public about the risks associated with the vaccine .
And you can guess what happened next… @ @ @ @ @ @ @ video , according to claims from social media users .
Fortunately , the video is still on YouTube .
Please watch it and share it before the Big Tech oligarchs decide to take it down !
In case that first video gets deleted , here is a backup copy .
The Bell ’ s Palsy side effect is not a secret .
It has happened in the clinical trials and is well publicized .
However , the media has appeared to go on an apologist tour for the vaccine .
Take a look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Bell ’ s Palsy in COVID-19 Vaccine Trials : Why You Shouldn ’ t Worry .
Reports released from Pfizer and Moderna show that seven COVID-19 vaccine trial participants experienced a type of facial paralysis , called Bell ’ s palsy , in the weeks after vaccination .
This rare side effect , in tandem with three reports of severe allergic reactions , has raised some alarm about the safety of the new vaccines .
An analysis of the number of Bell ’ s palsy incidents reported so far , however , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the number of people who experience Bell ’ s palsy in the general population .
According to the National Institutes of Health , Bell ’ s palsy affects about 40,000 people in the United States every year , which is 0.01 % of Americans.1 In the Pfizer-BioNTech clinical trial , which included 44,000 participants , 4 people reported experiencing Bell ’ s palsy , which is 0.0091 % of participants .
The incidents were reported 3,9 , 37 , and 48 days after vaccination .
No cases of Bell ’ s palsy were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Moderna clinical trial , which included 30,400 participants , 3 people reported experiencing Bell ’ s palsy , which is 0.099 % of participants .
One person was in the placebo group .
Among the three not in the placebo group , the Bell ’ s palsy incidents were reported 32 , 28 , and 22 days after vaccination.3 While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) briefing documents provided by Pfizer and Moderna indicate these rates of Bell ’ s palsy “ do not represent a frequency above that expected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FDA recommends surveillance for Bell ’ s palsy as the vaccines are distributed among the general population .
For anyone who does experience Bell ’ s palsy , the condition is treatable .
Oral steroids , especially if administered within 72 hours of symptom onset , are highly effective at restoring nerve function .
Shouldn ’ t we be concerned about potential side effects ?
Isn ’ t that the point of clinical trials ?
To prove to the public that the vaccine is safe ?
It doesn ’ t help build trust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ banning certain videos but refusing to “ fact check ” other claims .
The CDC website itself confirms that Bell ’ s Palsy is a risk .
That ’ s right : you could potentially suffer FACIAL PARALYSIS from the vaccine… which is protecting us from a virus that is 99 % survivable .
According to the CDC : To be clear , we are not making any claims that are not already verified by the authorities .
But how much have you heard the media talk about these side effects ?
SIGN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ID !
People should have the FREEDOM to take the vaccine if they WANT to .
But it shouldn ’ t be forced on anyone !
And people should have all the details and information regarding the safety of the vaccine before taking it .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
20,671 views
A heartbreaking video is going viral on social media.
A nurse filmed herself getting the COVID-19 vaccine.
When she received the vaccine, she developed Bell’s Palsy.
For those not familiar with the medical term, Bell’s Palsy is facial paralysis.
That’s right: the Nashville nurse is no longer able to move one half of her face.
But the story gets worse.
The video was posted on Twitter to warn the public about the risks associated with the vaccine.
And you can guess what happened next…
Twitter has appeared to have REMOVED the video, according to claims from social media users.
Fortunately, the video is still on YouTube.
Please watch it and share it before the Big Tech oligarchs decide to take it down!
In case that first video gets deleted, here is a backup copy.
The Bell’s Palsy side effect is not a secret.
It has happened in the clinical trials and is well publicized.
However, the media has appeared to go on an apologist tour for the vaccine.
Take a look at Very Well Health’s headline: Bell’s Palsy in COVID-19 Vaccine Trials: Why You Shouldn’t Worry.
The article states:
Reports released from Pfizer and Moderna show that seven COVID-19 vaccine trial participants experienced a type of facial paralysis, called Bell’s palsy, in the weeks after vaccination. This rare side effect, in tandem with three reports of severe allergic reactions, has raised some alarm about the safety of the new vaccines. An analysis of the number of Bell’s palsy incidents reported so far, however, shows the rate is no higher than the number of people who experience Bell’s palsy in the general population. According to the National Institutes of Health, Bell’s palsy affects about 40,000 people in the United States every year, which is 0.01% of Americans.1 In the Pfizer-BioNTech clinical trial, which included 44,000 participants, 4 people reported experiencing Bell’s palsy, which is 0.0091% of participants. The incidents were reported 3,9, 37, and 48 days after vaccination. No cases of Bell’s palsy were reported in the placebo group.2 In the Moderna clinical trial, which included 30,400 participants, 3 people reported experiencing Bell’s palsy, which is 0.099% of participants. One person was in the placebo group. Among the three not in the placebo group, the Bell’s palsy incidents were reported 32, 28, and 22 days after vaccination.3 While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) briefing documents provided by Pfizer and Moderna indicate these rates of Bell’s palsy “do not represent a frequency above that expected in the general population,” the FDA recommends surveillance for Bell’s palsy as the vaccines are distributed among the general population. For anyone who does experience Bell’s palsy, the condition is treatable. Oral steroids, especially if administered within 72 hours of symptom onset, are highly effective at restoring nerve function.
Shouldn’t we be concerned about potential side effects?
Isn’t that the point of clinical trials?
To prove to the public that the vaccine is safe?
It doesn’t help build trust either when social media decides to start banning certain videos but refusing to “fact check” other claims.
So, if I say I'm worried about Covid, with 99.9% survivality, I'm normal and if I'm worried about an experimental vaccine, that gives people anaphylaxis and Bell's palsy, I'm crazy….. 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 — Dennis O'C: Nurse Consultant NO Meds 😊 (@MMMHappiness1) December 25, 2020
It appears it will be rather EASY to recognize some individuals who unfortunately decided to try out these longitudinally untested mRNA vaccines. Pfizer reports Bell's Palsy and facial paralysis after 37 days post inoculation… pic.twitter.com/TRwhRPpPea — Doc Lindenbrook (@ProfLindenbrk) December 24, 2020
So the masses trust their governments and the medical institutions again, volunteerily take a COVID19 vaccine, that caused Bell's palsy in only the vaccinated group but not the placebo one Not to mention that it hits your DNA and there isn't enough safety studies on it 🤔 — AbdulrahmanAlSultan 🇸🇦 (@welcomehier) December 25, 2020
The CDC website itself confirms that Bell’s Palsy is a risk.
That’s right: you could potentially suffer FACIAL PARALYSIS from the vaccine… which is protecting us from a virus that is 99% survivable.
According to the CDC:
Cases of Bell’s palsy were reported in participants in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not consider these to be above the rate expected in the general population. They have not concluded these cases were caused by vaccination. Therefore, persons who have previously had Bell’s Palsy may receive an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.
To be clear, we are not making any claims that are not already verified by the authorities.
But how much have you heard the media talk about these side effects?
People should have the FREEDOM to take the vaccine if they WANT to.
But it shouldn’t be forced on anyone!
And people should have all the details and information regarding the safety of the vaccine before taking it.
It’s just common sense!


welovetrump--2020-12-29--Louie Gohmert Sues Mike Pence

Louie Gohmert Sues Mike Pence

Representative Louis Gohmert A Republican of Texas just filed a lawsuit against Vice President Mike Pence .
Gohmert ’ s lawsuit requests a federal judge in Texas to strike down the Electoral Count Act of 1887 as unconstitutional , and to grant Pence full authority to choose pro-Trump electors .
If passed by the Supreme Court , Trump will without a doubt remain in office .
Representative Louis Gohmert ( R. , Texas ) filed a lawsuit against Vice President Mike Pence on Monday , in an attempt to grant Pence the authority to overturn the results of the general @ @ @ @ @ @ @ results on January 6 , in a session presided over by the vice president .
The Electoral Count Act of 1887 requires the vice president to affirm the winner of the elections , in a largely ceremonial capacity .
However , Gohmert ’ s suit requests a federal judge in Texas to strike down the 1887 law as unconstitutional , and to grant Pence authority to appoint pro-Trump electors .
The move would effectively ensure that Trump returns to office .
A group of congressional Republicans led by Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him from confirming Joe Biden ’ s victory in the 2020 presidential election .
On Jan. 6 , Pence is set to preside over Congress ’ meeting to count the Electoral College votes , which will officially cement Biden as the next president , according to the 1887 Electoral Count Act that designates the vice president as the official to preside over the meeting .
The lawsuit , which lists Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward among almost a dozen additional plaintiffs , claims that any action that declares Biden the winner of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ POLL : Is CNN The Enemy Of The People ?

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
19,566 views
Wait, what?
Representative Louis Gohmert A Republican of Texas just filed a lawsuit against Vice President Mike Pence.
Don’t worry friends, it’s actually a good thing!
Gohmert’s lawsuit requests a federal judge in Texas to strike down the Electoral Count Act of 1887 as unconstitutional, and to grant Pence full authority to choose pro-Trump electors.
If passed by the Supreme Court, Trump will without a doubt remain in office.
Rep. Louie Gohmert sues Vice President Pence https://t.co/BLI0cPnr9s — Newsmax (@newsmax) December 28, 2020
Leading New Texas Rebellion, Louie Gohmert Sues Mike Pence Because VP Lacks Authority to Overturn Joe Biden’s Election Winhttps://t.co/NLu6IwJrPN — Law & Crime (@lawcrimenews) December 29, 2020
Yahoo News covered Gohmert’s suit and shared these details:
Representative Louis Gohmert (R., Texas) filed a lawsuit against Vice President Mike Pence on Monday, in an attempt to grant Pence the authority to overturn the results of the general elections. Congress will certify the election results on January 6, in a session presided over by the vice president. The Electoral Count Act of 1887 requires the vice president to affirm the winner of the elections, in a largely ceremonial capacity. However, Gohmert’s suit requests a federal judge in Texas to strike down the 1887 law as unconstitutional, and to grant Pence authority to appoint pro-Trump electors. The move would effectively ensure that Trump returns to office.
Congressman Louie Gohmert is a patriot who loves this country and a dear friend of mine. God bless him for exploring every single opportunity to support our great President and election integrity. We need more Members of Congress like Louie Gohmert! pic.twitter.com/R51c0DDVEJ — Brigitte Gabriel (@ACTBrigitte) December 28, 2020
Newsmax chipped in too:
A group of congressional Republicans led by Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert are suing Vice President Mike Pence to prevent him from confirming Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 presidential election. On Jan. 6, Pence is set to preside over Congress’ meeting to count the Electoral College votes, which will officially cement Biden as the next president, according to the 1887 Electoral Count Act that designates the vice president as the official to preside over the meeting. The lawsuit, which lists Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward among almost a dozen additional plaintiffs, claims that any action that declares Biden the winner of the election will be fraudulent.


welovetrump--2020-12-29--Trump Just Used The Impoundment Control Act Here’s What That Means To Americans

Trump just made a huge move to help benefit many struggling Americans .
The President just enacted the Impoundment Control Act .
What exactly is that ?
Well , the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is a piece of legislation that allows the President to request that Congress repeal funds in a bill that he doesn ’ t agree with .
In a statement released from the White House President Trump stated “ As President , I have told Congress that I want far less wasteful spending and more money going to the American people in the form of $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ per child.
” The House of Representatives has already passed the request made by President Trump , and now the Senate must vote on the new changes .
Here is the official statement by the President from Whitehouse : As President I am demanding many rescissions under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 .
The Act provides that , “ whenever the President determines that all or part of any budget authority will not be required to carry out the full objectives or scope of programs for which it is provided , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for fiscal policy or other reasons ( including termination of authorized projects or activities for which budget authority has been provided ) , the President shall transmit to both Houses of Congress a special message ” describing the amount to be reserved , the relevant accounts , the reasons for the rescission , and the economic effects of the rescission .
2 U.S.C .
§ 683 .
I will sign the Omnibus and Covid package with a strong message that makes clear to Congress that wasteful items need to be removed .
On @ @ @ @ @ @ @ payments to individuals from $ 600 to $ 2,000 .
Therefore , a family of four would receive $ 5,200 .
Additionally , Congress has promised that Section 230 , which so unfairly benefits Big Tech at the expense of the American people , will be reviewed and either be terminated or substantially reformed .
Likewise , the House and Senate have agreed to focus strongly on the very substantial voter fraud which took place in the November 3 Presidential election .
Friends not only did he sign the Compound Act to cut @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Congress has “ promised ” to terminate or reform Section 230 .
It doesn ’ t stop there though .
According to the White House Statement Congress will look more into the voter fraud that took place on November 3rd too .
So , this Compoun Act isn ’ t just about money after all .
In the President ’ s signing statement , accompanying his signature of the COVID aid/government funding plan , he points out he wants “ far less wasteful spending and more money going to the American people in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adult and $ 600 per child.
” Under the Budget Act of 1974 , the President is required to submit a “ budget request ” to Congress in the winter .
Many of the spending requests flagged by the President were consistent with his own budget request to Capitol Hill earlier this year .
But , the President goes on to say he is “ demanding many rescissions under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 .
The Act provides that , ‘ whenever the President determines that all or part of any budget @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out the full objectives or scope of programs for which it is provided , or that such budget authority should be rescinded for fiscal policy or other reasons ( including termination of authorized projects or activities for which budget authority has been provided ) , the President shall transmit to both Houses of Congress a special message ’ describing the amount to be reserved , the relevant accounts , the reasons for the rescission , and the economic effects of the rescission .
2 U.S.C .
§ 683.
” SIGN THE PETITION : @ @ @ @ @ @

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
69,318 views
Trump just made a huge move to help benefit many struggling Americans.
The President just enacted the Impoundment Control Act.
What exactly is that?
Well, the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is a piece of legislation that allows the President to request that Congress repeal funds in a bill that he doesn’t agree with.
In a statement released from the White House President Trump stated “As President, I have told Congress that I want far less wasteful spending and more money going to the American people in the form of $2,000 checks per adult and $600 per child.”
The House of Representatives has already passed the request made by President Trump, and now the Senate must vote on the new changes.
“I want far less wasteful spending and more money going to the American people” President Trump said he would use the #ImpoundmentControlAct to increase the #StimulusChecks amount to $2,000 and remove “wasteful spending” from the #ReliefBill. https://t.co/s4I3NVyZrk — The Epoch Times (@EpochTimes) December 28, 2020
Trump Sends Democrats a Major Curveball — Planning To Use 'Impoundment Control Act' https://t.co/FMF8XlHmH7 — Chuck Woolery (@chuckwoolery) December 28, 2020
Trump says he's signing the stimulus bill "with a strong message that makes clear to Congress that wasteful items need to be removed." "I will send back to Congress a redlined version, item by item… insisting that those funds be removed from the bill." pic.twitter.com/mBwNihEIvs — Andrew Solender (@AndrewSolender) December 28, 2020
Here is the official statement by the President from Whitehouse:
As President I am demanding many rescissions under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974. The Act provides that, “whenever the President determines that all or part of any budget authority will not be required to carry out the full objectives or scope of programs for which it is provided, or that such budget authority should be rescinded for fiscal policy or other reasons (including termination of authorized projects or activities for which budget authority has been provided), the President shall transmit to both Houses of Congress a special message” describing the amount to be reserved, the relevant accounts, the reasons for the rescission, and the economic effects of the rescission. 2 U.S.C. § 683. I will sign the Omnibus and Covid package with a strong message that makes clear to Congress that wasteful items need to be removed. On Monday the House will vote to increase payments to individuals from $600 to $2,000. Therefore, a family of four would receive $5,200. Additionally, Congress has promised that Section 230, which so unfairly benefits Big Tech at the expense of the American people, will be reviewed and either be terminated or substantially reformed. Likewise, the House and Senate have agreed to focus strongly on the very substantial voter fraud which took place in the November 3 Presidential election.
Friends not only did he sign the Compound Act to cut wasteful spending but he also stated that Congress has “promised” to terminate or reform Section 230.
It doesn’t stop there though.
According to the White House Statement Congress will look more into the voter fraud that took place on November 3rd too.
So, this Compoun Act isn’t just about money after all.
Congress will vote on additional stimulus checks and repealing Section 230 — all wins for the American people. Well done Mr. President! — Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) December 28, 2020
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1342813418177392649
Fox News covered the story too:
In the President’s signing statement, accompanying his signature of the COVID aid/government funding plan, he points out he wants “far less wasteful spending and more money going to the American people in the form of $2,000 checks per adult and $600 per child.” Under the Budget Act of 1974, the President is required to submit a “budget request” to Congress in the winter. Many of the spending requests flagged by the President were consistent with his own budget request to Capitol Hill earlier this year. But, the President goes on to say he is “demanding many rescissions under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974. The Act provides that, ‘whenever the President determines that all or part of any budget authority will not be required to carry out the full objectives or scope of programs for which it is provided, or that such budget authority should be rescinded for fiscal policy or other reasons (including termination of authorized projects or activities for which budget authority has been provided), the President shall transmit to both Houses of Congress a special message’ describing the amount to be reserved, the relevant accounts, the reasons for the rescission, and the economic effects of the rescission. 2 U.S.C. § 683.”


welovetrump--2020-12-28--Here’s Why President Trump Signed The Relief Bill, and Realize What This Means….

All day long I ’ ve seen people panicking about why President Trump signed the COVID relief bill .
Many of you emailed me about it .
Some of you didn ’ t understand… One person even told me they think this is evidence Trump has been a Deep State operator since the very beginning .
Are you kidding me ?
Once again , our President is the ONLY man , or woman for that matter , in Washington fighting for the American public .
He ’ s fighting against the entire Congress , except maybe 6 honorable Senators , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at nearly every turn .
I was trying to find the best way to explain to you what is going on and then I found this video that I think is perfect .
Please watch this and understand the real move here : Now read this Statement directly from the President and check out the part I put in bold for you so you can see this is the real deal — we do our research here at WeLoveTrump !
As President of the United States it is my responsibility to protect the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ devastation and hardship that was caused by the China Virus .
I understand that many small businesses have been forced to close as a result of harsh actions by Democrat-run states .
Many people are back to work , but my job is not done until everyone is back to work .
Fortunately , as a result of my work with Congress in passing the CARES Act earlier this year , we avoided another Great Depression .
Under my leadership , Project Warp Speed has been a tremendous success , my Administration and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of wildest expectations , and we are distributing these vaccines , and others soon coming , to millions of people .
As President , I have told Congress that I want far less wasteful spending and more money going to the American people in the form of $ 2,000 checks per adult and $ 600 per child .
As President I am demanding many rescissions under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 .
The Act provides that , “ whenever the President determines that all or part of any budget authority will not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ objectives or scope of programs for which it is provided , or that such budget authority should be rescinded for fiscal policy or other reasons ( including termination of authorized projects or activities for which budget authority has been provided ) , the President shall transmit to both Houses of Congress a special message ” describing the amount to be reserved , the relevant accounts , the reasons for the rescission , and the economic effects of the rescission .
2 U.S.C .
§ 683 .
I will sign the Omnibus and Covid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clear to Congress that wasteful items need to be removed .
I will send back to Congress a redlined version , item by item , accompanied by the formal rescission request to Congress insisting that those funds be removed from the bill .
I am signing this bill to restore unemployment benefits , stop evictions , provide rental assistance , add money for PPP , return our airline workers back to work , add substantially more money for vaccine distribution , and much more .
On Monday the House will vote to increase @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 2,000 .
Therefore , a family of four would receive $ 5,200 .
Additionally , Congress has promised that Section 230 , which so unfairly benefits Big Tech at the expense of the American people , will be reviewed and either be terminated or substantially reformed .
Likewise , the House and Senate have agreed to focus strongly on the very substantial voter fraud which took place in the November 3 Presidential election .
The Senate will start the process for a vote that increases checks to $ 2,000 , repeals Section @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voter fraud .
Big Tech must not get protections of Section 230 !
Much more money is coming .
I will never give up my fight for the American people !
And check out this next part .
You have to realize what this means .
This means that President Trump must be expecting a DRASTIC shift in Congress in a few weeks .
Something dramatically different than what we see right now .
Because he ’ s basically banking on a future Congress totally re-doing this piece of garbage .
Now ask @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will WE know ?
Read this from the House website : What is the Impoundment Control Act ?
The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 ( ICA ) reasserted Congress ’ power of the purse .
Specifically , Title X of the Act – “ Impoundment Control ” – established procedures to prevent the President and other government officials from unilaterally substituting their own funding decisions for those of the Congress .
The Act also created the House and Senate Budget Committees and the Congressional Budget Office .
Why was the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in response to President Nixon ’ s executive overreach – his Administration refused to release Congressionally appropriated funds for certain programs he opposed .
While the U.S. Constitution broadly grants Congress the power of the purse , the President – through the White House Office of Management and Budget ( OMB ) and executive agencies – is responsible for the actual spending of funds .
The ICA created a process the President must follow if he or she seeks to delay or cancel funding that Congress has provided .
What does it mean @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ impoundment ” is any action – or inaction – by an officer or employee of the federal government that precludes federal funds from being obligated [ 1 ] or spent , either temporarily or permanently .
How does the ICA work ?
The ICA lays out procedures the President must follow to reduce , delay , or eliminate funding in an account .
The Act divides impoundments into two categories : rescissions and deferrals .
Rescissions Put simply , if the President wants to spend less money than Congress provided for a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first secure a law providing Congressional approval to rescind the funding in question .
The ICA requires that the President send a special message to Congress identifying the amount of the proposed rescission ; the reasons for it ; and the budgetary , economic , and programmatic effects of the rescission .
Upon transmission of such special message , the President may withhold certain funding in the affected accounts for up to 45 legislative session days .
If a law approving the rescission is not enacted within the 45 days , any withheld @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A 2018 Government Accountability Office legal opinion holds that if the President proposes a rescission , he or she must make the affected funds available to be prudently obligated before the funds expire , even if the 45-day clock is still running .
This means , for example , that the President can not strategically time a rescission request for late in the fiscal year and withhold the funding until it expires , thus achieving a rescission without Congressional approval .
Deferrals The ICA defines a “ deferral ” as withholding , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ action or inaction – effectively precluding funding from being obligated or spent .
The ICA prescribes three narrow circumstances in which the President may propose to defer funding for a program : ( 1 ) providing for contingencies ; ( 2 ) achieving budgetary savings made possible through improved operational efficiency ; and ( 3 ) as specifically provided by law .
The ICA requires that the President send a special message to Congress identifying the amount of the proposed deferral ; the reasons for it ; and the period of the proposed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ message , the funds may be deferred without further action by Congress ; however , the deferral can not extend beyond the end of the fiscal year in which the special message is sent .
The ICA language on deferrals is long-standing budget law that allows the Executive branch to delay the obligation or expenditure of funding only for the specified reasons rather than policy reasons .
Why is the ICA important ?
Today , 45 years after the ICA became law , Congress once again confronts a President attempting to push past @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This year , for the second straight year , the Trump Administration reportedly considered issuing rescission requests for certain foreign aid and security assistance accounts less than 45 days before the end of the fiscal year , when the funds in question would expire .
In the closing weeks of fiscal 2019 , OMB withheld funding in these accounts in a manner inconsistent with longstanding procedures and policies .
The House Budget and Appropriations Committees have serious concerns that President Trump and his administration violated the ICA in withholding these funds .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and how these funds were withheld ; and whether these actions prevented agencies from spending the full amount that Congress provided for these activities , thus thwarting the will of Congress .
Congress will not bend to executive overreach .
It will defend its constitutional power of the purse and the fundamental checks and balances that are critical to our constitutional republic .
[ 1 ] To “ obligate ” funds means to incur a legal obligation to pay , such as by entering into a contract for services .
Last , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In the President ’ s signing statement , accompanying his signature of the COVID aid/government funding plan , he points out he wants “ far less wasteful spending and more money going to the American people in the form of $ 2,000 checks per adult and $ 600 per child.
” Under the Budget Act of 1974 , the President is required to submit a “ budget request ” to Congress in the winter .
Many of the spending requests flagged by the President were consistent with his own budget request to Capitol @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the President goes on to say he is “ demanding many rescissions under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 .
The Act provides that , ‘ whenever the President determines that all or part of any budget authority will not be required to carry out the full objectives or scope of programs for which it is provided , or that such budget authority should be rescinded for fiscal policy or other reasons ( including termination of authorized projects or activities for which budget authority has been provided ) , the President shall transmit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ message ’ describing the amount to be reserved , the relevant accounts , the reasons for the rescission , and the economic effects of the rescission .
2 U.S.C .
§ 683.
” Like the President ’ s budget request , a rescission is a “ budget-cutting request.
” Rescissions bills aren ’ t unheard of .
But the administration must now send to Capitol Hill a list of items that it wants to be cut .
It ’ s then up to Congress to advance a potential rescissions bill .
And , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this Congress , such a request is nearly out of the question .
It ’ s possible Congress could address the proposal before Mr. Trump leaves office January 20 .
But doubtful .
Congress does not have to vote on a rescissions bill and often ignores such requests .
But , technically , an administration can only withhold ( impound , thus the name of the act ) funds for a month and a half .
If Congress doesn ’ t act on the rescission request , the Treasury has to spend the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Constitution gives Congress ultimate control over the federal “ purse.
” It says “ No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury , but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law.
” This is why a “ line-item veto ” is unconstitutional at the federal level .
Congress approved the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 to curb some of the type of spending flagged by Mr. Trump .
In other words , Congress could pass a bill .
A President could sign it , but veto specific “ lines , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1998 , the Supreme Court found the line-item veto unconstitutional in Clinton v. New York .
Article I , Section 7 of the Constitution includes the “ presentment clause.
” It states that once the House and Senate have passed a bill it shall “ be presented to the President of the United States .
If he approves , he shall sign it , but if not , he shall return it , with his Objections.
” In other words , the “ presentment clause ” gives the President a binary choice .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ veto a bill .
He can ’ t just veto “ part ” of a bill .
That would be a “ line-item veto .
”

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
71,170 views
All day long I’ve seen people panicking about why President Trump signed the COVID relief bill.
Many of you emailed me about it.
Some of you didn’t understand…
Some thought he caved….
One person even told me they think this is evidence Trump has been a Deep State operator since the very beginning.
Are you kidding me?
Complete nonsense.
Once again, our President is the ONLY man, or woman for that matter, in Washington fighting for the American public.
He’s fighting against the entire Congress, except maybe 6 honorable Senators, and he’s still beating them at nearly every turn.
I was trying to find the best way to explain to you what is going on and then I found this video that I think is perfect.
Please watch this and understand the real move here:
Comments:
Now read this Statement directly from the President and check out the part I put in bold for you so you can see this is the real deal — we do our research here at WeLoveTrump!
As President of the United States it is my responsibility to protect the people of our country from the economic devastation and hardship that was caused by the China Virus. I understand that many small businesses have been forced to close as a result of harsh actions by Democrat-run states. Many people are back to work, but my job is not done until everyone is back to work. Fortunately, as a result of my work with Congress in passing the CARES Act earlier this year, we avoided another Great Depression. Under my leadership, Project Warp Speed has been a tremendous success, my Administration and I developed a vaccine many years ahead of wildest expectations, and we are distributing these vaccines, and others soon coming, to millions of people. As President, I have told Congress that I want far less wasteful spending and more money going to the American people in the form of $2,000 checks per adult and $600 per child. As President I am demanding many rescissions under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974. The Act provides that, “whenever the President determines that all or part of any budget authority will not be required to carry out the full objectives or scope of programs for which it is provided, or that such budget authority should be rescinded for fiscal policy or other reasons (including termination of authorized projects or activities for which budget authority has been provided), the President shall transmit to both Houses of Congress a special message” describing the amount to be reserved, the relevant accounts, the reasons for the rescission, and the economic effects of the rescission. 2 U.S.C. § 683. I will sign the Omnibus and Covid package with a strong message that makes clear to Congress that wasteful items need to be removed. I will send back to Congress a redlined version, item by item, accompanied by the formal rescission request to Congress insisting that those funds be removed from the bill. I am signing this bill to restore unemployment benefits, stop evictions, provide rental assistance, add money for PPP, return our airline workers back to work, add substantially more money for vaccine distribution, and much more. On Monday the House will vote to increase payments to individuals from $600 to $2,000. Therefore, a family of four would receive $5,200. Additionally, Congress has promised that Section 230, which so unfairly benefits Big Tech at the expense of the American people, will be reviewed and either be terminated or substantially reformed. Likewise, the House and Senate have agreed to focus strongly on the very substantial voter fraud which took place in the November 3 Presidential election. The Senate will start the process for a vote that increases checks to $2,000, repeals Section 230, and starts an investigation into voter fraud. Big Tech must not get protections of Section 230! Voter Fraud must be fixed! Much more money is coming. I will never give up my fight for the American people!
And check out this next part.
You have to realize what this means.
This means that President Trump must be expecting a DRASTIC shift in Congress in a few weeks.
Something dramatically different than what we see right now.
Because he’s basically banking on a future Congress totally re-doing this piece of garbage.
Now ask yourself what does he know and when will WE know?
Soon, I believe.
Read this from the House website:
What is the Impoundment Control Act?
The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (ICA) reasserted Congress’ power of the purse. Specifically, Title X of the Act – “Impoundment Control” – established procedures to prevent the President and other government officials from unilaterally substituting their own funding decisions for those of the Congress. The Act also created the House and Senate Budget Committees and the Congressional Budget Office. Why was the ICA necessary?
Congress passed the ICA in response to President Nixon’s executive overreach – his Administration refused to release Congressionally appropriated funds for certain programs he opposed. While the U.S. Constitution broadly grants Congress the power of the purse, the President – through the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and executive agencies – is responsible for the actual spending of funds. The ICA created a process the President must follow if he or she seeks to delay or cancel funding that Congress has provided. What does it mean to ‘impound’ funds?
An “impoundment” is any action – or inaction – by an officer or employee of the federal government that precludes federal funds from being obligated[1] or spent, either temporarily or permanently. How does the ICA work?
The ICA lays out procedures the President must follow to reduce, delay, or eliminate funding in an account. The Act divides impoundments into two categories: rescissions and deferrals. Rescissions
Put simply, if the President wants to spend less money than Congress provided for a particular purpose, he or she must first secure a law providing Congressional approval to rescind the funding in question. The ICA requires that the President send a special message to Congress identifying the amount of the proposed rescission; the reasons for it; and the budgetary, economic, and programmatic effects of the rescission. Upon transmission of such special message, the President may withhold certain funding in the affected accounts for up to 45 legislative session days. If a law approving the rescission is not enacted within the 45 days, any withheld funds must be made available for obligation. A 2018 Government Accountability Office legal opinion holds that if the President proposes a rescission, he or she must make the affected funds available to be prudently obligated before the funds expire, even if the 45-day clock is still running. This means, for example, that the President cannot strategically time a rescission request for late in the fiscal year and withhold the funding until it expires, thus achieving a rescission without Congressional approval. Deferrals
The ICA defines a “deferral” as withholding, delaying, or – through other Executive action or inaction – effectively precluding funding from being obligated or spent. The ICA prescribes three narrow circumstances in which the President may propose to defer funding for a program: (1) providing for contingencies; (2) achieving budgetary savings made possible through improved operational efficiency; and (3) as specifically provided by law. The ICA requires that the President send a special message to Congress identifying the amount of the proposed deferral; the reasons for it; and the period of the proposed deferral. Upon transmission of such special message, the funds may be deferred without further action by Congress; however, the deferral cannot extend beyond the end of the fiscal year in which the special message is sent. The ICA language on deferrals is long-standing budget law that allows the Executive branch to delay the obligation or expenditure of funding only for the specified reasons rather than policy reasons. Why is the ICA important?
Today, 45 years after the ICA became law, Congress once again confronts a President attempting to push past the long-recognized boundaries of executive budgetary power. This year, for the second straight year, the Trump Administration reportedly considered issuing rescission requests for certain foreign aid and security assistance accounts less than 45 days before the end of the fiscal year, when the funds in question would expire. In the closing weeks of fiscal 2019, OMB withheld funding in these accounts in a manner inconsistent with longstanding procedures and policies. The House Budget and Appropriations Committees have serious concerns that President Trump and his administration violated the ICA in withholding these funds. The committees are examining when, why, and how these funds were withheld; and whether these actions prevented agencies from spending the full amount that Congress provided for these activities, thus thwarting the will of Congress. Congress will not bend to executive overreach. It will defend its constitutional power of the purse and the fundamental checks and balances that are critical to our constitutional republic. [1] To “obligate” funds means to incur a legal obligation to pay, such as by entering into a contract for services.
Last, here is Fox News with more:


welovetrump--2020-12-28--Trump: “Time for Republican Senators to Step Up and Fight for The Presidency,” Lists ‘Irrefutable Pr

Trump: “Time for Republican Senators to Step Up and Fight for The Presidency,” Lists ‘Irrefutable Proof’ of Rigged Election

The time for talk is over .
The time for action is now .
President Donald Trump is calling on @ @ @ @ @ and fight for the presidency .
President Trump laid out “ irrefutable proof ” of @ @ @ @ @ .
He touted videos of ballot boxes being stuffed , deceased voters , double voters @ @ @ @ @ the massive ballot drops in several of the swing states .
He also criticized GOP @ @ @ @ @ this election is stolen .

The time for talk is over.
The time for action is now.
President Donald Trump is calling on Republican Senators to step up and fight for the presidency.
President Trump laid out “irrefutable proof” of massive irregularities in this election.
He touted videos of ballot boxes being stuffed, deceased voters, double voters, fake signatures, and the massive ballot drops in several of the swing states.
He also criticized GOP lawmakers for remaining silent while this election is stolen.


welovetrump--2020-12-28--Over 500,000 ‘Phantom Voters’ Discovered in PA by Mathematician Who Was Suspended From Twitter After

Over 500,000 ‘Phantom Voters’ Discovered in PA by Mathematician Who Was Suspended From Twitter After Testifying in AZ Voter Fraud Hearing

If you ’ ve been following this farce of a presidential election for the last two months , chances are @ @ @ @ @ Bobby Piton .
Just one month ago , Mr. Pitton testified at the Arizona voter @ @ @ @ @ claimed that up to 300,000 fake people voted in the AZ election .
That same @ @ @ @ @ his account .
Once again , a social media corporation worked hand-in-hand with the fake @ @ @ @ @ in order to silence the truth and steal the election .
Now , Bobby has @ @ @ @ @ from the battleground state of Pennsylvania .
After examining over 9 million records in the @ @ @ @ @ unique last names who voted .
This means all of these people have absolutely ZERO @ @ @ @ @ same last name .
In other words , over 500,000 phantom voters voted in PA @

If you’ve been following this farce of a presidential election for the last two months, chances are you have heard the name Bobby Piton.
Just one month ago, Mr. Pitton testified at the Arizona voter fraud hearing, where he claimed that up to 300,000 fake people voted in the AZ election.
That same day, Twitter promptly suspended his account.
Once again, a social media corporation worked hand-in-hand with the fake news media and the democrats in order to silence the truth and steal the election.
Now, Bobby has discovered even bigger voter irregularities from the battleground state of Pennsylvania.
After examining over 9 million records in the state, he discovered 521,879 unique last names who voted.
This means all of these people have absolutely ZERO family members who share the same last name.
In other words, over 500,000 phantom voters voted in PA.


welovetrump--2020-12-29--Jeffery Epstein’s Last Cellmate Found Dead

I don ’ t think this catches anyone by surprise .
The last person to share a cell with convicted pedophile Jeffery Epstein has died .
According to multiple reports Efrain Reyes was found dead inside his mother ’ s apartment in New York .
Reyes was Epstein ’ s roommate but was removed to a private prison just the day before Epstein allegedly “ hanged himself ” ( we all know he was really taken out by the deep state ) .
The MSM claimed he died of the Coronavirus although according to prison records he contracted the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shortly after .
The Washington Examiner had the scoop and shared these details : The last inmate to share a cell with the late convicted sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein reportedly died after contracting the coronavirus last month .
Efrain Reyes , 51 , was found dead in bed in his mother ’ s New York City apartment on Nov. 27 , the New York City Police Department confirmed to the New York Daily News .
Reyes shared a cell with Epstein in August 2019 but was transferred to a different facility just a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reyes was literally moved a day before Epstein died and now reports are saying Reyes died of the Coronavirus even though he contracted the virus in April .
The last man known to have shared a jail cell with the late Jeffrey Epstein reportedly has died from the coronavirus .
Efrain Reyes , 51 , was found dead on Nov. 27 inside his mother ’ s apartment in New York City , police confirmed to the New York Daily News .
The Daily News reports that Reyes was transferred to a private prison @ @ @ @ @ @ @ August 2019 – and it was there that he contracted the coronavirus .
BOOKMARK IT : Check Out My New Site , NoahReport.com !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
8,610 views
I don’t think this catches anyone by surprise.
The last person to share a cell with convicted pedophile Jeffery Epstein has died.
According to multiple reports Efrain Reyes was found dead inside his mother’s apartment in New York.
Reyes was Epstein’s roommate but was removed to a private prison just the day before Epstein allegedly “hanged himself” (we all know he was really taken out by the deep state).
The MSM claimed he died of the Coronavirus although according to prison records he contracted the virus and was releases in April and recovered shortly after.
Epstein’s Last Cellmate Found Dead After Catching COVID-19, Authorities Say https://t.co/NObk0rZ6oB — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) December 28, 2020
The inmate shared a cell with Jeffrey Epstein in August 2019. He was transferred to a different facility just a day before Epstein was found dead. https://t.co/495sBnwuom — Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) December 29, 2020
The Washington Examiner had the scoop and shared these details:
The last inmate to share a cell with the late convicted sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein reportedly died after contracting the coronavirus last month. Efrain Reyes, 51, was found dead in bed in his mother’s New York City apartment on Nov. 27, the New York City Police Department confirmed to the New York Daily News. Reyes shared a cell with Epstein in August 2019 but was transferred to a different facility just a day before Epstein was found dead.
Reyes was literally moved a day before Epstein died and now reports are saying Reyes died of the Coronavirus even though he contracted the virus in April.
This definitely raises eyebrows.
https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1343620193608749056
In yet more Epstein news, his cell mate, who was transferred the day before he was found hanged, died of COVID-19 in November… https://t.co/j81A89H0om — Harriet Alexander (@h_alexander) December 29, 2020
Fox News chipped in also:


welovetrump--2020-12-29--Eerie Similarities: Tennessee Bomber Looks Like Missing Minnesota Man

A missing person photo of a Minessota man named David Dahl has many people across the internet saying he looks exactly like the accused Tennessee Bomber Anthony Quinn Warner .
David was last seen in Ramsey , Minnesota on November of 2017 and has been missing ever since .
Missing in Minnesota reported these details about Dahl ’ s disappearance : David was last seen near the 7600 block of 181st Avenue northwest in Ramsey , Minnesota at 3:00 a.m. on November 14 , 2017 .
He was on foot at the time , didn ’ t have a vehicle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ properly dressed for the winter weather .
He has never been heard from again .
According to his daughter , Dahl had been released from the hospital just a few days before his disappearance .
He has a history of homelessness , sleeping in a tent during the winter of 2016-2017 , and has good survival skills .
It ’ s possible he sought shelter in a local barn .
According to Yahoo News the FBI declared Anthony Quinn Warner the man behind the Nashville Bombing : Anthony Quinn Warner is the person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Christmas day explosion in Nashville , police chief John Drake confirmed Sunday .
Warner , 63 , is a longtime Nashvillian who held several IT jobs throughout his life .
Federal authorities are scouring the city for evidence on Warner .
Public records show he had extensive experience with electronics and alarm systems .
He recently worked as an independent computer technician with the real estate firm Fridrich & Clark .
SIGN THE PETITION : We Need National Voter ID !
I ’ m not trying to push a conspiracy theory down your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the CIA during the Cold War used MK-Ultra on several missing persons in order to study the effects of mind control and see if they could break a person down to do something against their will .
Anyway , do you think they look alike ?
Let us know your opinion in the comments down below .

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
16,686 views
This is a bit strange.
A missing person photo of a Minessota man named David Dahl has many people across the internet saying he looks exactly like the accused Tennessee Bomber Anthony Quinn Warner.
David was last seen in Ramsey, Minnesota on November of 2017 and has been missing ever since.
Why does the #NashvilleBomber look exactly like David Dahl, missing from Minnesota since November 🤔https://t.co/B5AQsxjheu pic.twitter.com/iVbDkIoWlv — Pat McGroin (@PhilMcCrotch4) December 28, 2020
Missing in Minnesota reported these details about Dahl’s disappearance:
David was last seen near the 7600 block of 181st Avenue northwest in Ramsey, Minnesota at 3:00 a.m. on November 14, 2017. He was on foot at the time, didn’t have a vehicle or a cell phone, and not properly dressed for the winter weather. He has never been heard from again. According to his daughter, Dahl had been released from the hospital just a few days before his disappearance. He has a history of homelessness, sleeping in a tent during the winter of 2016-2017, and has good survival skills. It’s possible he sought shelter in a local barn.
The #FBI and #ATF are seeking info concerning the owner of the RV, Anthony Quinn Warner, linked to the explosion in downtown Nashville on Friday morning. Recognize him? Call 1-800-CALL-FBI or submit tips online at https://t.co/hG6KFmQ7dG. @FBI @ATFHQ @ATFNashville pic.twitter.com/o8fqiHkATl — FBI Memphis (@FBIMemphis) December 28, 2020
#MISSING –
Can you help the Ramsey Police Department find David Dahl, missing since November 14th? Call the Ramsey PD at 763-427-6812 or dial 911. https://t.co/UTWljfxklP — Ramsey Sheriff (MN) (@RamseySheriff) November 21, 2017
According to Yahoo News the FBI declared Anthony Quinn Warner the man behind the Nashville Bombing:
GET THE TRUTH: DailyTruthReport.com Anthony Quinn Warner is the person of interest investigators have linked with the Christmas day explosion in Nashville, police chief John Drake confirmed Sunday. Warner, 63, is a longtime Nashvillian who held several IT jobs throughout his life. Federal authorities are scouring the city for evidence on Warner. Public records show he had extensive experience with electronics and alarm systems. He recently worked as an independent computer technician with the real estate firm Fridrich & Clark.
I’m not trying to push a conspiracy theory down your throat but on a side note, the CIA during the Cold War used MK-Ultra on several missing persons in order to study the effects of mind control and see if they could break a person down to do something against their will.
Anyway, do you think they look alike?
Let us know your opinion in the comments down below.


welovetrump--2020-12-29--17 Pennsylvania Lawmakers Claim 202,377 More Votes Than Registered Voters

Before you attempt to “ fact check ” us , try reading what we ’ re actually saying instead of drawing your own conclusion .
Let us be very clear : we are not making any claims about voter fraud .
We are simply reporting the news .
And what is that news ?
Well , 17 Pennsylvania lawmakers are now ON THE RECORD saying that 202,377 more votes were cast than there were registered voters .
That is coming from at least 17 ELECTED government officials .
These 17 representatives sponsored an analysis on the 2020 presidential election and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unaccounted for .
Why does this matter ?
The Constitution expressly gives state legislatures the responsibility to run their own elections .
And it is clear that more and more Pennsylvania representatives are UNCOMFORTABLE with the “ official ” results .
Local WJAC TV News has more details on the findings of this groundbreaking study : A group of Republican lawmakers say they ’ ve performed an extensive analysis of election day data and they ’ ve found “ troubling ” discrepancies .
According to State Rep. Frank Ryan ( R-Lebanon ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ analysis .
Ryan , who is a certified public accountant , says they discovered discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election which is making them question how the results could have been certified by Gov .
Tom Wolf and Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar .
According to Ryan , the analysis compared official county election results to the total number of voters who voted Nov. 3 , as recorded by the Department of State .
Ryan says they found @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being cast , while DoS/SURE system records indicated that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted .
Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast , 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race , including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates , according to Ryan .
He says the difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting , together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race , adds up to a discrepancy of 170,830 votes , which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between Donald @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s election results were certified Nov. 24 and Gov .
Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors stating that Biden received 80,555 more votes than Trump .
The group of lawmakers released the following joint statement : “ We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania , the Executive branch , and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification , postmarks , and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers , all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.
” “ However , we are now seeing discrepancies on the retail level which raise even more troubling questions regarding irregularities in the election returns .
These findings call into question the accuracy of the SURE system , consistency in the application of the Pennsylvania Election Code from county to county , and the competency of those charged with oversight of elections in our Commonwealth .
“ These numbers just don @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alleged certification of Pennsylvania ’ s presidential election results was absolutely premature , unconfirmed , and in error.
” In a little over a week , the United States Congress will meet to certify the Electoral College votes .
Will Pennsylvania ’ s legislature be able to gain enough momentum to decertify their own votes ?
But if 2020 has taught us anything , anything is possible .
And hey , this is a good first step in the right direction .
Could the findings of this analysis be what President Trump tweeted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Trump ’ s tweet was fact checked , but it appears the leftwing mainstream media isn ’ t aware… or reporting… on the representatives ’ analysis : A dubious tweet from President Trump about the election results in Pennsylvania prompted confusion and fact checks on Monday .
He issued a missive in the afternoon that appeared to quote someone saying , “ Breaking News : In Pennsylvania there were 205,000 more votes than there were voters .
This alone flips the state to President Trump.
” Trump did not say where he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the tweet with a message that said , “ Election officials have certified Joe Biden as the winner of the U.S. Presidential election.
” The tweet was sent after a group of Pennsylvania state lawmakers , all Republicans , released an analysis that claims data from Election Day shows the “ numbers don ’ t add up.
” One finding the group highlighted was how there were 202,377 “ more votes cast than voters voting ” when comparing county data to Department of State data on Nov. 3 .
The figure mentioned in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ alleged certification of Pennsylvania ’ s presidential election results was absolutely premature , unconfirmed , and in error , ” is relatively close to the one Trump tweeted , but if this was the statistic the president was talking about , he confused “ voters voting ” with how many voters are actually in the state .
As multiple journalists pointed out in response to Trump ’ s tweet , there are more than 9 million voters registered in Pennsylvania and more than 6,900,000 votes cast in the 2020 election , according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did not immediately return a request for comment on whether Trump was tweeting about the GOP analysis in Pennsylvania .
NATIONAL POLL : Would You Like To See `` The Squad '' Voted Out of Office ?
We hope that more evidence continues to come to light !
And we hope that more Constitution-loving patriots continue to stand up and fight for our country !

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here
21,598 views
Dear social media oligarchs…
Before you attempt to “fact check” us, try reading what we’re actually saying instead of drawing your own conclusion.
Let us be very clear: we are not making any claims about voter fraud.
We are simply reporting the news.
And what is that news?
Well, 17 Pennsylvania lawmakers are now ON THE RECORD saying that 202,377 more votes were cast than there were registered voters.
Again… that’s not our claim.
That’s not our analysis.
That is coming from at least 17 ELECTED government officials.
These 17 representatives sponsored an analysis on the 2020 presidential election and found that 202, 377 votes were unaccounted for.
https://twitter.com/Bubblebathgirl/status/1343693300050628608
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1343732761211719680
Pennsylvania election vote totals don’t add up, State rep Russ Diamond report Dec 29, 2020, “202,377 more votes cast than voters voting”, Certification error https://t.co/gaKwGOBSg7 — Recycle Uses (@RecycleUses) December 28, 2020
Why does this matter?
Well…
The Constitution expressly gives state legislatures the responsibility to run their own elections.
And it is clear that more and more Pennsylvania representatives are UNCOMFORTABLE with the “official” results.
Local WJAC TV News has more details on the findings of this groundbreaking study:
A group of Republican lawmakers say they’ve performed an extensive analysis of election day data and they’ve found “troubling” discrepancies. According to State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon), 17 lawmakers sponsored and participated in the analysis. Ryan, who is a certified public accountant, says they discovered discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election which is making them question how the results could have been certified by Gov. Tom Wolf and Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar. According to Ryan, the analysis compared official county election results to the total number of voters who voted Nov. 3, as recorded by the Department of State. Ryan says they found that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicated that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted. Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates, according to Ryan. He says the difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to a discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Pennsylvania’s election results were certified Nov. 24 and Gov. Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors stating that Biden received 80,555 more votes than Trump. The group of lawmakers released the following joint statement: “We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.” “However, we are now seeing discrepancies on the retail level which raise even more troubling questions regarding irregularities in the election returns. These findings call into question the accuracy of the SURE system, consistency in the application of the Pennsylvania Election Code from county to county, and the competency of those charged with oversight of elections in our Commonwealth. “These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”
In a little over a week, the United States Congress will meet to certify the Electoral College votes.
Will Pennsylvania’s legislature be able to gain enough momentum to decertify their own votes?
It’s unlikely…
But if 2020 has taught us anything, anything is possible.
And hey, this is a good first step in the right direction.
Could the findings of this analysis be what President Trump tweeted about earlier?
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1343663159085834248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1343663159085834248%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fconfusion-trump-tweets-nonexistent-vote-discrepancy-pennsylvania
The Washington Examiner confirms that Trump’s tweet was fact checked, but it appears the leftwing mainstream media isn’t aware… or reporting… on the representatives’ analysis:
A dubious tweet from President Trump about the election results in Pennsylvania prompted confusion and fact checks on Monday. He issued a missive in the afternoon that appeared to quote someone saying, “Breaking News: In Pennsylvania there were 205,000 more votes than there were voters. This alone flips the state to President Trump.” Trump did not say where he got the quote, and Twitter flagged the tweet with a message that said, “Election officials have certified Joe Biden as the winner of the U.S. Presidential election.” The tweet was sent after a group of Pennsylvania state lawmakers, all Republicans, released an analysis that claims data from Election Day shows the “numbers don’t add up.” One finding the group highlighted was how there were 202,377 “more votes cast than voters voting” when comparing county data to Department of State data on Nov. 3. The figure mentioned in the press release, which claims the “alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error,” is relatively close to the one Trump tweeted, but if this was the statistic the president was talking about, he confused “voters voting” with how many voters are actually in the state. SIGN THE PETITION: Release The Epstein Client List! As multiple journalists pointed out in response to Trump’s tweet, there are more than 9 million voters registered in Pennsylvania and more than 6,900,000 votes cast in the 2020 election, according to state data. The White House did not immediately return a request for comment on whether Trump was tweeting about the GOP analysis in Pennsylvania.
A lot can change in a week.
January 6, 2021 is quickly approaching.
We hope that more evidence continues to come to light!
And we hope that more Constitution-loving patriots continue to stand up and fight for our country!