21stcenturywire--2020-11-23--COVID 19: Mounting Evidence of International Fraud

COVID 19 , and the subsequent governmental responses , appear to be part of an international conspiracy to commit fraud .
It seems there is no evidence that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19 .
Sometimes you have to go with your gut .
I am not an expert in genetics and , as ever , stand to be corrected .
However my attention was drawn to some research published by the Spanish medical journal D-Salud-Discovery .
Their advisory board of eminently qualified physicians and scientists lends further credibility to their research .
Their claim is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used in RT-PCR tests to identify SARS-CoV-2 do not target anything specific .
I followed the search techniques outlined in this English translation of their report and can corroborate the accuracy of their claims about the nucleotide sequences listed in the World Health Organisations protocols .
You can do the same .
D-Salud-Discovery state there are no tests capable of identifying SARS-CoV-2 .
Consequently all claims about the alleged impact of COVID 19 on population health are groundless .
The entire official COVID 19 narrative is a deception .
Ostensibly , there is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
If these claims are accurate we can state that there is no evidence of a pandemic , merely the illusion of one .
We have suffered incalculable loss for no evident reason , other than the ambitions of unscrupulous despots who wish to transform the global economy and our society to suit their purposes .
In doing so this “ parasite class ” have potentially committed countless crimes .
These crimes can and should be investigated and prosecuted in a court of law .
Identification of What Exactly ?
The World @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( COronaVIrus Disease 2019 ) .
They declared a global COVID 19 pandemic on March 11th 2020 .
“ The etiologic agent [ causation for the disease ] responsible for the cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan has been identified as a novel betacoronavirus , ( in the same family as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV ) via next generation sequencing ( NGS ) from cultured virus or directly from samples received from several pneumonia patients.
” The WHO ’ s claim is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus causes the disease COVID-19 .
They also allege @ @ @ @ @ @ @ researchers in Wuhan .
In the WHO ’ s Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCov Situation Report 1 , they state : “ The Chinese authorities identified a new type of coronavirus , which was isolated on 7 January 2020……On 12 January 2020 , China shared the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus for countries to use in developing specific diagnostic kits.
” These two statements from the WHO clearly suggest the SARS-CoV-2 virus was isolated ( meaning purified for study ) and then genetic sequences were identified from the isolated sample .
From this , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to test for the virus in towns , cities and communities around the world .
According to the WHO and Chinese researchers , these tests will find the virus that causes COVID 19 .
Yet the WHO also state : “ Working directly from sequence information , the team developed a series of genetic amplification ( PCR ) assays used by laboratories.
” The Wuhan scientists developed their genetic amplification assays from “ sequence information ” because there was no isolated , purified sample of the so called SARS-CoV-2 virus .
They also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discovered virions ( the spiky protein ball containing the viral RNA . )
However , such protein structures are not unique .
They look just like other round vesicles , such as endocytic vesicles and exosomes .
Virologists claim that it is not possible to “ isolate ” a virus because they only replicate inside host cells .
They add that Koch ’ s postulates do not apply because they relate to bacteria ( which are living organisms ) .
Instead , virologists observe the virus ’ cytopathogenic effects ( CPE ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cell cultures .
When Chinese researchers first sequenced the full SARS-CoV-2 genome they observed CPE in Vero E6 and Huh7 cells .
Vero E6 are an immortalised monkey cell line and Huh7 are immortalised cancer ( tumorigenic ) cells .
Meaning they have been maintained in vitro ( in petri dish cultures ) for many years .
Central to the official SARS-CoV-2 story is the idea that it is a zoonotic virus , capable of bridging the species gap from animals to humans .
When scientists from the U.S. CDC “ infected ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ noted the following : “ We examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines , including human adenocarcinoma cells ( A549 ) [ lung celles ] , human liver cells ( HUH7.0 ) , and human embryonic kidney cells ( HEK-293T ) , in addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 [ monkey cells ] ……No cytopathic effect was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells [ monkey cells ] …….HUH7.0 and 293T cells showed only modest viral replication and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] were incompatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
” The CDC did not observe any CPE in human cells .
They saw no evidence that this alleged virus caused any human illness .
Nor did this supposed human virus show any notable replication in human cells , suggesting human to human infection would be impossible .
Noting this problem , a team of Polish scientists introduced this sequenced “ virus ” to human epithethelium ( airway ) cells .
They observed the effects on these HAE cultures for 5 days .
They noted much greater @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stated : “ We did not observe any release of the virus from the basolateral side of the HAE culture.
” Meaning they did not see any evidence of the supposed virions breaching the cell wall membrane .
Again suggesting this so called virus isn ’ t infectious in human beings .
It is not clear that SARS-CoV-2 is a human virus capable of causing illness .
It may not even physically exist .
Is it nothing more than a concept based upon predictive genetic sequences ?
The Wuhan Center for Disease Control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clinical Centre published the first full SARS-CoV-2 genome ( MN908947.1 ) .
This has been updated many times .
However , MN908947.1 was the first genetic sequence describing the alleged COVID 19 etiologic agent ( SARS-CoV-2 ) .
All subsequent claims , tests , treatments , statistics , vaccine development and resultant policies are based upon this sequence .
If the tests for this novel virus don ’ t identify anything capable of causing illness in human beings , the whole COVID 19 narrative is nothing but a charade .
The WUHAN researchers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence together by matching fragments found in samples with other , previously discovered , genetic sequences .
From the gathered material they found an 87.1 % match with SARS coronavirus ( SARS-Cov ) .
They used de novo assembly and targeted PCR and found 29,891-base-pair which shared a 79.6 % sequence match to SARS-CoV .
They had to use de novo assembly because they had no priori knowledge of the correct sequence or order of those fragments .
Quite simply , the WHO ’ s statement that Chinese researchers isolated the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Wuhan team used 40 rounds of RT-qPCR amplification to match fragments of cDNA ( complimentary DNA constructed from sampled RNA fragments ) with the published SARS coronavirus genome ( SARS-CoV ) .
Unfortunately it isn ’ t clear how accurate the original SARS-CoV genome is either .
In 2003 a team of researchers from from Hong Kong studied 50 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome ( SARS ) .
They took samples from 2 of these patients and developed a culture in fetal monkey liver cells .
They created 30 clones @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Unable to find evidence of any other known virus , in just one of these cloned samples they found genetic sequences of “ unkown origin.
” Examining these unknown RNA sequences they found 57 % match to bovine coronavirus and murine hepatitis virus and deduced it was of the family Coronaviridae .
Considering these sequences to suggest a newly discovered SARS-CoV virus ( new discoveries being ambrosia for scientists ) , they designed RT-PCR primers to test for this novel virus .
The researchers stated : “ Primers for detecting the new virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ human pneumonia-associated coronavirus genome in clinical samples .
Of the 44 nasopharyngeal samples available from the 50 SARS patients , 22 had evidence of human pneumonia-associated coronavirus RNA.
” Half of the tested patients , who all had the same symptoms , tested positive for this new alleged virus .
No one knows why the other half tested negative for this novel SARS-CoV virus .
The question wasn ’ t asked .
This supposed virus had just a 57 % sequence match to allegedly known coronavirus .
The other 43 % was just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and recorded as a new genome as GenBank Accession No .
AY274119 .
The Wuhan researchers subsequently found an 79.6 % sequence match to AY274119 and therefore called it a novel strain of SARS-CoV ( 2019-nCoV – eventually renamed SARS-CoV-2 ) .
No one , at any stage of this process , had produced any isolated , purified sample of any virus .
All they had were percentage sequence matches to other percentage sequence matches .
Scientists are very annoyed because they keep saying the virus has been isolated but no one believes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yet , no one has provided a single purified sample of the SARS-CoV-2 virus .
What we have instead is a completed genome and , as we are about to discover , it isn ’ t particularly convincing .
Investigative journalists Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter asked some of the scientists who said they had images of SARS-C0V-2 virions to confirm these were images of an isolated , purified , virus .
None of them could .
In Australia scientists from the Doherty Institute , announced that they had isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said : “ We have short ( RNA ) sequences from the diagnostic test that can be used in the diagnostic tests ” This explains why the Australian government state : “ The reliability of COVID-19 tests is uncertain due to the limited evidence base…There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests.
” In The UK , in July , a group of concerned academics wrote a letter to the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson in which they asked him to : “ Produce independently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Covid-19 virus has been isolated.
” To date they have not received a reply .
Similarly , UK researcher Andrew Johnson made a Freedom of Information Request to Public Health England ( PHE ) .
He asked them to provide him with their records describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus .
To which they responded : “ PHE can confirm it does not hold information in the way suggested by your request.
” Canadian researcher Christine Massey made a similar freedom of information request , asking the Canadian government the same .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Having completed a thorough search , we regret to inform you that we were unable to locate any records responsive to your request.
” In the U.S. the Centre For Disease Control ( CDC ) RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel state : “ …No quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available……..Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.
” Last updated on 13th July 2020 , the CDC are yet to obtain any pure viral sample from any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 .
They openly admit their tests don ’ t necessarily show if SARS-CoV-2 is either present or causes COVID 19 .
We are told that none of this matters .
That we are ignorant and just don ’ t understand virology .
Therefore , we must except pictures of things we know could be something else and genetic sequences ( which could be anything else ) as conclusive proof that this virus , and the disease it is supposed to cause , are real .
The WHO , and every government , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government scientific advisor , supranational institutions and others who promote the official COVID 19 narrative , assert that SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID 19 .
While no one has ever produced a sample of this supposed virus , the alleged SARS-CoV-2 genome has been published .
It is in the public domain .
Key genetic sequences , in the SARS-CoV-2 genome , are said to have specific functions .
These are the target proteins that scientists test for to identify the presence of the “ virus ” .
These include : • RNA-polymerase ( Rd-Rp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ RNA to replicate inside the cytoplasm of COVID 19 diseased epithelial cells .
• S gene ( Orf2 ) – this glycoprotein forms the spike on the SARS-CoV-2 virion surface which supposedly facilitates SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE2 receptors on cells , allowing the RNA inside the virion protein shell ( capsid ) to pass into the now infected cell .
• N gene ( Orf9a ) – the nucleocapsid gene which binds the RNA in capsid formation The WHO maintain a publicly available record of the RT-PCR primers and probes used to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ specific nucleotide sequences that bind ( anneal ) to the antisense and sense strands of the synthesised cDNA ( called forward and reverse primers respectively . )
The cDNA strands separate when heated and reform when cooled .
Prior to cooling , nucleotide sequences called probes are introduced to anneal to specific target regions of the suspected viral genome .
During amplification , as the regions between primers elongate , when a primer strikes a probe , the probe decays releasing a fluorescent or dye which can then be read by researchers .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ which scientists claim to prove the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in a sample .
Something else which is publicly available is the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool ( BLAST ) .
This allows anyone to compare published nucleotide sequences with all those stored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) genetic database called GenBank .
Therefore we can BLAST the claimed SARS-CoV-2 primers , probes and target gene sequences .
The WHO ’ s forward , reverse primers and probe protocols , for the alleged SARS-CoV-2 viral genome , are based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ E gene profiles .
Anyone can run them through BLAST to see what we find .
The vital RdRP nucleotide sequence , used as a forward primer is – ATGAGCTTAGTCCTGTTG .
If we run a nucleotide BLAST this is recorded as a complete SARS-CoV-2 isolate with a 100 % matched sequence identity .
Similarly the reverse E gene primer sequence – ATATTGCAGCAGTACGCACACA – reveals the presence of the Orf1ab sequence which also identifies SARS-CoV-2 .
However , BLAST also enables us to search the nucleotide sequences of the microbial and human genomes .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ sequence it reveals 99 human chromosome with a 100 % sequence identity match .
The Orf1ab ( E gene ) returns 90 with a 100 % sequence identity match to human chromosomes .
Doing the same for these sequences with a microbial search finds 92 microbes with a 100 % match to the SARS-CoV-2 E gene and 100 matched microbes , with a 100 % sequence identity , to the vital SARS-CoV-2 RdRp gene .
Whenever we check the so called unique genetic markers for SARS-CoV-2 , recorded in the WHO protocols , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with various fragments of the human genome .
This suggests that the genetic sequences , which are supposed to identify SARS-CoV-2 , are not unique .
They could be anything from microbial sequences to fragments of human chromosomes .
So called fact checkers , like Reuters ’ Health Feedback project , have been quick to dismiss the claims of those who have noticed the apparent lack of specificity in the supposed SARS-CoV-2 genome .
Using a slew of strawman arguments like , “ this claim suggests every test should be positive , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their debunking attempt runs something like this : Primers are designed to bind to specific nucleotide sequences that are unique to the virus .
The forward primer may bind to a particular chromosome but the reverse primer doesn ’ t bind to the same chromosome and so the chromosome is not present in the SARS-CoV-2 virus .
Moreover because the forward and perverse primers envelop the sequence to be amplified the cDMA sequence between primers is unique to the virus .
This seems to deliberately misrepresent the significance of these findings by forwarding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than the fact checkers themselves , are making .
BLAST searches show that these target sequences are not unique to SARS-CoV-2 .
Nor do all targets need to be found for a result to be deemed positive .
Moroccan researchers investigated the epidemiology of Moroccan alleged cases of SARS-CoV-2 .
Nine percent were positive for three genes , eighteen percent were positive for two genes and seventy three percent for just one .
As we have just discussed , many may have been positive for none .
This is entirely in keeping with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state : Regardless of the spurious arguments of well funded fact checkers , if the forward and reverse primers identify junk , perhaps one being the fragment of a chromosome and the other a microbial sequence , then the amplified region between them is probably junk too .
The argument that RT-PCR only finds RNA is specious .
Natural transcription ( the separation of DNA strands ) occurs during gene expression .
No one is saying whole chromosomes or microbes are sequenced in the alleged SARS-CoV-2 genome .
Though they may , for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the alleged markers , used to test for this supposed virus , are not fit for purpose .
RT-PCR tests do not sequence the entire genome .
They look for incidents of specific probe florescence to indicate the presence of sequences said to exist .
These sequences are defined by MN908947.1 and the subsequent updates .
These primers and probes could reveal nothing but RNA matches extracted from non-coding , sometimes called “ junk , ” DNA ( cDNA . )
For example the SARS-CoV-2 S gene is meant to be highly specific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ target sequence is – TTGGCAAAATTCAAGACTCACTTTC .
A microbial BLAST search returns 97 microbial matches with 100 % identity sequence match .
The lowest identity percentage match , within the top 100 , is 95 % .
A human genome BLAST also finds a 100 % sequence match to 86 human chromosome fragments .
No matter where you look in the supposed genome of SARS-CoV-2 , there is nothing in the WHO ’ s test protocols that clearly identifies what it is .
The whole genome could be false .
The tests do not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they reveal is a soup of unspecified genetic material .
If so , as there are no isolates or purified samples of the virus , without a viable test , there is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exists .
Therefore , nor is there any evidence that a disease called COVID 19 exists .
This infers that there is no scientific basis for any claims about COVID 19 case numbers , hospital admissions or mortality figures .
All measures taken to combat this deadly virus are quite possibly founded upon nothing .
Fraud is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of fraud is : “ Some deceitful practice or willful device , resorted to with intent to deprive another of his right , or in some manner to do him an injury.
” The Legal definition of a conspiracy is : “ A combination or confederacy between two or more persons formed for the purpose of committing , by their joint efforts , some unlawful or criminal act ” It seems , those who claim we face a pandemic have not provided any evidence to show that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the information strongly suggesting this possibility is readily available in the public domain .
Anyone can read it .
For there to be a fraud the deceit must be wilful .
The intention must be to deliberately deprive others of their rights or injure them in some other way .
If there is evidence of collusion between individuals ad/or organisations to commit fraud , then this is a conspiracy ( in Common Law jurisdictions ) or a Joint Criminal Enterprise ( JCE ) under International Law .
It seems COVID 19 has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wage war on humanity .
We have been imprisoned in our own homes , our freedom to roam restricted , freedom of speech and expression eroded , rights to protest curtailed , separated from loved ones , our businesses destroyed , psychologically bombarded , muzzled and terrorised .
Prince Charles and World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab , planning their ‘ Great Reset ’ in Jan 2020 ( Image Credit : REUTERS/Denis Balibouse ) Worse still , while there is no evidence of unprecedented all cause mortality , there were unseasonable spikes in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ measures which saw the withdrawal of the health services we pay for and a reorientation of public health services to treat one alleged disease at the exclusion of all others .
Further , it is proposed by those who have forwarded the COVID 19 story , that this alleged disease provides justification for the complete restructuring of the global economy , our political systems , societies , cultures and humanity itself .
To be allowed to participate in their so called “ new normal , ” which is the wholesale transformation of our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ insist we submit to their conditions .
These include , but aren ’ t limited to , bio-metric surveillance of everyone , the centralised control and monitoring of all of our transactions , oppressive business and social restrictions and an effective demand that we have no right to sovereignty over our own bodies .
This constitutes the condition of slavery .
There is no doubt that we have been deprived of our rights and injured .
In Common Law jurisdictions innocence is presumed , but the evidence that harm has been deliberately caused @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Destructive policies , enacted by governments across the world , clearly originated among globalist think tanks and supranational institutions long before the emergence of this non existent pandemic .
In Napoleonic Code jurisdictions , guilt is presumed .
In order for the accused conspirators to prove their innocent they must show that , despite their immeasurable resources , they have collectively been unable to access or understand any of the freely available evidence suggesting COVID 19 is a myth .
Those responsible for the crime of conspiracy to commit global fraud should be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be imprisoned while the rest of us get on with trying to repair the damage they have already inflicted .
*** Author Iain Davis is an independent researcher and short filmmaker and the author of the new book , A Dangerous Ideology .
See more of Iain ’ s work at his blog site In This Together and follow him at Twitter & Steemit & MINDS .
Also you can watch his short films and videos on YouTube , DTube and BitChute .
An original version of the article was previously published at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV

By
Iain Davis
21st Century Wire
COVID 19, and the subsequent governmental responses, appear to be part of an international conspiracy to commit fraud. It seems there is no evidence that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19.
Sometimes you have to go with your gut. I am not an expert in genetics and, as ever, stand to be corrected. However my attention was drawn to some research published by the Spanish medical journal D-Salud-Discovery. Their advisory board of eminently qualified physicians and scientists lends further credibility to their research. Their claim is astounding.
The genetic primers and probes used in RT-PCR tests to identify SARS-CoV-2 do not target anything specific. I followed the search techniques outlined in this English translation of their report and can corroborate the accuracy of their claims about the nucleotide sequences listed in the World Health Organisations protocols. You can do the same.
D-Salud-Discovery state there are no tests capable of identifying SARS-CoV-2. Consequently all claims about the alleged impact of COVID 19 on population health are groundless.
The entire official COVID 19 narrative is a deception. Ostensibly, there is no scientific foundation for any part of it.
If these claims are accurate we can state that there is no evidence of a pandemic, merely the illusion of one. We have suffered incalculable loss for no evident reason, other than the ambitions of unscrupulous despots who wish to transform the global economy and our society to suit their purposes.
In doing so this “parasite class” have potentially committed countless crimes. These crimes can and should be investigated and prosecuted in a court of law.
Identification of What Exactly?
The World Health Organisation (WHO) classified COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). They declared a global COVID 19 pandemic on March 11th 2020.
The WHO’s Laboratory testing guidance states:
“The etiologic agent [causation for the disease] responsible for the cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan has been identified as a novel betacoronavirus, (in the same family as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV) via next generation sequencing (NGS) from cultured virus or directly from samples received from several pneumonia patients.”
The WHO’s claim is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus causes the disease COVID-19. They also allege this virus has been clearly identified by researchers in Wuhan.
In the WHO’s Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCov Situation Report 1, they state:
“The Chinese authorities identified a new type of coronavirus, which was isolated on 7 January 2020……On 12 January 2020, China shared the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus for countries to use in developing specific diagnostic kits.”
These two statements from the WHO clearly suggest the SARS-CoV-2 virus was isolated (meaning purified for study) and then genetic sequences were identified from the isolated sample. From this, diagnostic kits were developed and distributed globally to test for the virus in towns, cities and communities around the world. According to the WHO and Chinese researchers, these tests will find the virus that causes COVID 19.
Yet the WHO also state:
“Working directly from sequence information, the team developed a series of genetic amplification (PCR) assays used by laboratories.”
The Wuhan scientists developed their genetic amplification assays from “sequence information” because there was no isolated, purified sample of the so called SARS-CoV-2 virus. They also showed electron microscope images of the newly discovered virions (the spiky protein ball containing the viral RNA.)
However, such protein structures are not unique. They look just like other round vesicles, such as endocytic vesicles and exosomes.
Virologists claim that it is not possible to “isolate” a virus because they only replicate inside host cells. They add that Koch’s postulates do not apply because they relate to bacteria (which are living organisms). Instead, virologists observe the virus’ cytopathogenic effects (CPE), causing cell mutation and degradation, in cell cultures.
When Chinese researchers first sequenced the full SARS-CoV-2 genome they observed CPE in Vero E6 and Huh7 cells. Vero E6 are an immortalised monkey cell line and Huh7 are immortalised cancer (tumorigenic) cells. Meaning they have been maintained in vitro (in petri dish cultures) for many years.
Central to the official SARS-CoV-2 story is the idea that it is a zoonotic virus, capable of bridging the species gap from animals to humans. When scientists from the U.S. CDC “infected” various cells with the novel virus they noted the following:
“We examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549) [lung celles], human liver cells (HUH7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T), in addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 [monkey cells]……No cytopathic effect was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells [monkey cells]…….HUH7.0 and 293T cells showed only modest viral replication and A549 cells [human lung tissue cells] were incompatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection.”
The CDC did not observe any CPE in human cells. They saw no evidence that this alleged virus caused any human illness. Nor did this supposed human virus show any notable replication in human cells, suggesting human to human infection would be impossible.
It is not clear that SARS-CoV-2 is a human virus capable of causing widespread illness. It may not even physically exist. Is it nothing more than a concept based upon predictive genetic sequences?”
Voyage Of Discovery
The Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre published the first full SARS-CoV-2 genome (MN908947.1 ). This has been updated many times. However, MN908947.1 was the first genetic sequence describing the alleged COVID 19 etiologic agent (SARS-CoV-2).
All subsequent claims, tests, treatments, statistics, vaccine development and resultant policies are based upon this sequence. If the tests for this novel virus don’t identify anything capable of causing illness in human beings, the whole COVID 19 narrative is nothing but a charade.
The WUHAN researchers stated that they had effectively pieced the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence together by matching fragments found in samples with other, previously discovered, genetic sequences. From the gathered material they found an 87.1% match with SARS coronavirus (SARS-Cov). They used de novo assembly and targeted PCR and found 29,891-base-pair which shared a 79.6% sequence match to SARS-CoV.
They had to use de novo assembly because they had no priori knowledge of the correct sequence or order of those fragments. Quite simply, the WHO’s statement that Chinese researchers isolated the virus on the 7th January is false.
The Wuhan team used 40 rounds of RT-qPCR amplification to match fragments of cDNA (complimentary DNA constructed from sampled RNA fragments) with the published SARS coronavirus genome (SARS-CoV). Unfortunately it isn’t clear how accurate the original SARS-CoV genome is either.
In 2003 a team of researchers from from Hong Kong studied 50 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). They took samples from 2 of these patients and developed a culture in fetal monkey liver cells.
They created 30 clones of the genetic material they found. Unable to find evidence of any other known virus, in just one of these cloned samples they found genetic sequences of “unkown origin.”
CHART: E Gene target sequence
Examining these unknown RNA sequences they found 57% match to bovine coronavirus and murine hepatitis virus and deduced it was of the family Coronaviridae. Considering these sequences to suggest a newly discovered SARS-CoV virus (new discoveries being ambrosia for scientists), they designed RT-PCR primers to test for this novel virus. The researchers stated:
“Primers for detecting the new virus were designed for RT-PCR detection of this human pneumonia-associated coronavirus genome in clinical samples. Of the 44 nasopharyngeal samples available from the 50 SARS patients, 22 had evidence of human pneumonia-associated coronavirus RNA.”
Half of the tested patients, who all had the same symptoms, tested positive for this new alleged virus. No one knows why the other half tested negative for this novel SARS-CoV virus. The question wasn’t asked.
This supposed virus had just a 57% sequence match to allegedly known coronavirus. The other 43% was just “there.” Sequenced data was produced and recorded as a new genome as GenBank Accession No. AY274119.
The Wuhan researchers subsequently found an 79.6% sequence match to AY274119 and therefore called it a novel strain of SARS-CoV (2019-nCoV – eventually renamed SARS-CoV-2). No one, at any stage of this process, had produced any isolated, purified sample of any virus. All they had were percentage sequence matches to other percentage sequence matches.
Isolate Nothing
Scientists are very annoyed because they keep saying the virus has been isolated but no one believes them. This is because, as yet, no one has provided a single purified sample of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. What we have instead is a completed genome and, as we are about to discover, it isn’t particularly convincing.
Investigative journalists Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter asked some of the scientists who said they had images of SARS-C0V-2 virions to confirm these were images of an isolated, purified, virus. None of them could.
In Australia scientists from the Doherty Institute, announced that they had isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus. When asked to clarify the scientists said:
“We have short (RNA) sequences from the diagnostic test that can be used in the diagnostic tests”
This explains why the Australian government state:
“The reliability of COVID-19 tests is uncertain due to the limited evidence base…There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests.”
In The UK, in July, a group of concerned academics wrote a letter to the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson in which they asked him to:
“Produce independently peer reviewed scientific evidence proving that the Covid-19 virus has been isolated.”
To date they have not received a reply.
Similarly, UK researcher Andrew Johnson made a Freedom of Information Request to Public Health England (PHE). He asked them to provide him with their records describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus. To which they responded:
“PHE can confirm it does not hold information in the way suggested by your request.”
Canadian researcher Christine Massey made a similar freedom of information request, asking the Canadian government the same. To which the Canadian government replied:
“Having completed a thorough search, we regret to inform you that we were unable to locate any records responsive to your request.”
In the U.S. the Centre For Disease Control (CDC) RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel state:
“…No quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available……..Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”
Last updated on 13th July 2020, the CDC are yet to obtain any pure viral sample from any patient said to have the disease of COVID-19. They openly admit their tests don’t necessarily show if SARS-CoV-2 is either present or causes COVID 19.
We are told that none of this matters. That we are ignorant and just don’t understand virology. Therefore, we must except pictures of things we know could be something else and genetic sequences (which could be anything else) as conclusive proof that this virus, and the disease it is supposed to cause, are real.
Testing For Nothing
The WHO, and every government, think tank, policy steering committee, government scientific advisor, supranational institutions and others who promote the official COVID 19 narrative, assert that SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID 19. While no one has ever produced a sample of this supposed virus, the alleged SARS-CoV-2 genome has been published. It is in the public domain.
Key genetic sequences, in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, are said to have specific functions. These are the target proteins that scientists test for to identify the presence of the “virus”. These include:
RNA-polymerase (Rd-Rp) gene – This enables the SARS-CoV-2 RNA to replicate inside the cytoplasm of COVID 19 diseased epithelial cells.
S gene (Orf2) – this glycoprotein forms the spike on the SARS-CoV-2 virion surface which supposedly facilitates SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE2 receptors on cells, allowing the RNA inside the virion protein shell (capsid) to pass into the now infected cell.
E gene (Orf1ab) – small membrane protein used in viral assembly
N gene (Orf9a) – the nucleocapsid gene which binds the RNA in capsid formation
The WHO maintain a publicly available record of the RT-PCR primers and probes used to test for SARS-CoV-2. The primers are specific nucleotide sequences that bind (anneal) to the antisense and sense strands of the synthesised cDNA (called forward and reverse primers respectively.)
The cDNA strands separate when heated and reform when cooled. Prior to cooling, nucleotide sequences called probes are introduced to anneal to specific target regions of the suspected viral genome. During amplification, as the regions between primers elongate, when a primer strikes a probe, the probe decays releasing a fluorescent or dye which can then be read by researchers.
It is the identification of these markers which scientists claim to prove the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in a sample.
Something else which is publicly available is the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). This allows anyone to compare published nucleotide sequences with all those stored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) genetic database called GenBank. Therefore we can BLAST the claimed SARS-CoV-2 primers, probes and target gene sequences.
The WHO’s forward, reverse primers and probe protocols, for the alleged SARS-CoV-2 viral genome, are based upon RdRp, Orf1, N and E gene profiles. Anyone can run them through BLAST to see what we find.
The vital RdRP nucleotide sequence, used as a forward primer is – ATGAGCTTAGTCCTGTTG. If we run a nucleotide BLAST this is recorded as a complete SARS-CoV-2 isolate with a 100% matched sequence identity. Similarly the reverse E gene primer sequence – ATATTGCAGCAGTACGCACACA – reveals the presence of the Orf1ab sequence which also identifies SARS-CoV-2.
However, BLAST also enables us to search the nucleotide sequences of the microbial and human genomes. If we search for the RdRp SARS-CoV-2 sequence it reveals 99 human chromosome with a 100% sequence identity match. The Orf1ab (E gene) returns 90 with a 100% sequence identity match to human chromosomes.
Doing the same for these sequences with a microbial search finds 92 microbes with a 100% match to the SARS-CoV-2 E gene and 100 matched microbes, with a 100% sequence identity, to the vital SARS-CoV-2 RdRp gene.
Whenever we check the so called unique genetic markers for SARS-CoV-2, recorded in the WHO protocols, we find complete or high percentage matches with various fragments of the human genome. This suggests that the genetic sequences, which are supposed to identify SARS-CoV-2, are not unique. They could be anything from microbial sequences to fragments of human chromosomes.
So called fact checkers, like Reuters’ Health Feedback project, have been quick to dismiss the claims of those who have noticed the apparent lack of specificity in the supposed SARS-CoV-2 genome. Using a slew of strawman arguments like, “this claim suggests every test should be positive,” (which it doesn’t) their debunking attempt runs something like this:
Primers are designed to bind to specific nucleotide sequences that are unique to the virus. The forward primer may bind to a particular chromosome but the reverse primer doesn’t bind to the same chromosome and so the chromosome is not present in the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Moreover because the forward and perverse primers envelop the sequence to be amplified the cDMA sequence between primers is unique to the virus.
This seems to deliberately misrepresent the significance of these findings by forwarding an argument that no one, other than the fact checkers themselves, are making. BLAST searches show that these target sequences are not unique to SARS-CoV-2. Nor do all targets need to be found for a result to be deemed positive.
Moroccan researchers investigated the epidemiology of Moroccan alleged cases of SARS-CoV-2. Nine percent were positive for three genes, eighteen percent were positive for two genes and seventy three percent for just one. As we have just discussed, many may have been positive for none.
This is entirely in keeping with WHO’s test guidelines. They state:
“An optimal diagnosis consists of a NAAT [nucleic acid amplification test] with at least two genome-independent targets of the SARS-CoV-2; however, in areas where transmission is widespread, a simple single-target algorithm can be used……One or more negative results do not necessarily rule out the SARS-CoV-2 infection.”
Regardless of the spurious arguments of well funded fact checkers, if the forward and reverse primers identify junk, perhaps one being the fragment of a chromosome and the other a microbial sequence, then the amplified region between them is probably junk too.
The argument that RT-PCR only finds RNA is specious. Natural transcription (the separation of DNA strands) occurs during gene expression. No one is saying whole chromosomes or microbes are sequenced in the alleged SARS-CoV-2 genome. Though they may, for all we know. They are saying the alleged markers, used to test for this supposed virus, are not fit for purpose.
RT-PCR tests do not sequence the entire genome. They look for incidents of specific probe florescence to indicate the presence of sequences said to exist. These sequences are defined by MN908947.1 and the subsequent updates. These primers and probes could reveal nothing but RNA matches extracted from non-coding, sometimes called “junk,” DNA (cDNA.)
For example the SARS-CoV-2 S gene is meant to be highly specific to the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome. The target sequence is – TTGGCAAAATTCAAGACTCACTTTC. A microbial BLAST search returns 97 microbial matches with 100% identity sequence match. The lowest identity percentage match, within the top 100, is 95%. A human genome BLAST also finds a 100% sequence match to 86 human chromosome fragments.
No matter where you look in the supposed genome of SARS-CoV-2, there is nothing in the WHO’s test protocols that clearly identifies what it is. The whole genome could be false. The tests do not prove the existence of SARS-CoV-2. All they reveal is a soup of unspecified genetic material.
If so, as there are no isolates or purified samples of the virus, without a viable test, there is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exists. Therefore, nor is there any evidence that a disease called COVID 19 exists.
This infers that there is no scientific basis for any claims about COVID 19 case numbers, hospital admissions or mortality figures. All measures taken to combat this deadly virus are quite possibly founded upon nothing.
Conclusive Fraud
Fraud is a criminal act. The legal definition of fraud is:
“Some deceitful practice or willful device, resorted to with intent to deprive another of his right, or in some manner to do him an injury.”
The Legal definition of a conspiracy is:
“A combination or confederacy between two or more persons formed for the purpose of committing, by their joint efforts, some unlawful or criminal act”
It seems, those who claim we face a pandemic have not provided any evidence to show that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19. All of the information strongly suggesting this possibility is readily available in the public domain. Anyone can read it.
For there to be a fraud the deceit must be wilful. The intention must be to deliberately deprive others of their rights or injure them in some other way. If there is evidence of collusion between individuals ad/or organisations to commit fraud, then this is a conspiracy (in Common Law jurisdictions) or a Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) under International Law.
It seems COVID 19 has been deliberately used as a casus belli to wage war on humanity. We have been imprisoned in our own homes, our freedom to roam restricted, freedom of speech and expression eroded, rights to protest curtailed, separated from loved ones, our businesses destroyed, psychologically bombarded, muzzled and terrorised.
Prince Charles and World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab, planning their ‘Great Reset’ in Jan 2020 (Image Credit: REUTERS/Denis Balibouse)
Worse still, while there is no evidence of unprecedented all cause mortality, there were unseasonable spikes in deaths. These correlate precisely with Lockdown measures which saw the withdrawal of the health services we pay for and a reorientation of public health services to treat one alleged disease at the exclusion of all others.
Further, it is proposed by those who have forwarded the COVID 19 story, that this alleged disease provides justification for the complete restructuring of the global economy, our political systems, societies, cultures and humanity itself.
To be allowed to participate in their so called “new normal,” which is the wholesale transformation of our entire society without our consent, they insist we submit to their conditions.
These include, but aren’t limited to, bio-metric surveillance of everyone, the centralised control and monitoring of all of our transactions, oppressive business and social restrictions and an effective demand that we have no right to sovereignty over our own bodies. This constitutes the condition of slavery.
There is no doubt that we have been deprived of our rights and injured. In Common Law jurisdictions innocence is presumed, but the evidence that harm has been deliberately caused by an international conspiracy is overwhelming. Destructive policies, enacted by governments across the world, clearly originated among globalist think tanks and supranational institutions long before the emergence of this non existent pandemic.
In Napoleonic Code jurisdictions, guilt is presumed. In order for the accused conspirators to prove their innocent they must show that, despite their immeasurable resources, they have collectively been unable to access or understand any of the freely available evidence suggesting COVID 19 is a myth.
Those responsible for the crime of conspiracy to commit global fraud should be tried. If found guilty they should be imprisoned while the rest of us get on with trying to repair the damage they have already inflicted.
***
Author Iain Davis is an independent researcher and short filmmaker and the author of the new book, A Dangerous Ideology. See more of Iain’s work at his blog site In This Together and follow him at Twitter & Steemit & MINDS. Also you can watch his short films and videos on YouTube, DTube and BitChute. An original version of the article was previously published at In This Together.
READ MORE COVID-19 NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire COVID-19 Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-11-25--UK Thought Police: When Questioning Official Narratives Becomes ‘Terrorism’

Whoever controls the ideological landscape controls the world .
are from the Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police , Neil Basu , published in the Evening Standard on 19th November .
I have highlighted some keywords in capitals which I will refer to later in the analysis .
“ Britain ’ s top counter-terrorism officer today called for a NATIONWIDE DEBATE on the introduction of new laws to punish people who spread ANTI-VACCINATION CONSPIRACY THEORIES.
” “ Met Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu said that there should be a DISCUSSION about whether it is “ the correct thing for society to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ THAT COULD COST PEOPLE ’ S LIVES ” as he responded to concern that false claims online could undermine the take up of Covid-19 vaccines.
” “ There is a DEBATE FOR SOCIETY to have about FREE SPEECH and responsibility and people who are spreading misinformation that could cost people ’ s lives ” Do you see what they ’ re trying to achieve ?
This propagandised message from the Met is attempting to reconstruct the ideological landscape , reframe the parameters of what a debate is , reclassify free speech , weaponise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ principle : ‘ Innocent until proven guilty.
’ In other words , the government is attempting to whitewash free speech towards the kind of one world ideology that was endemic in the former Soviet Union , where thinking contrary to the ideology of the Communist Party was criminalised .
But there is something even more odious concealed within this Goebbelsian public service announcement : here we have a senior police officer using threatening language to intimidate and shakedown the general population .
This is on the very same day that Boris Johnson flexed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for laser guns , direct energy weapons , an artificial intelligence agency and the creation of a national cyber force ( a group of computer hackers to conduct offensive operations ) .
Offensive operations against who exactly ?
Britain is not currently at war , but according to the Assistant Commissioner of the MET , the government is waging an ideological war against anti vaccination conspiracy theorists .
Ideological wars of this nature typically take place online , which is where much of the government ’ s military budget is being invested .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the government is at war with ?
These strong arm tactics by a fledgling totalitarian regime , learning its trade , could be interpreted as coercion against the British public , and it is likely that the government is not only targeting dissenters , skeptics or those unwilling to wear the uniform of the Red Army , they are in fact threatening the entire population .
We can therefore interpret the stern warning from the Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police , as follows : 1 ) , DEBATES and DISCUSSIONS are permissible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extent of punishment to be served on those publicly voicing concerns or questioning the legitimacy or safety of vaccinations .
2 ) , Despite the fact that a DEBATE and DISCUSSION is being proposed and this DEBATE is apparently open to all ( NATIONWIDE ) , ANTI-VACCINATION CONSPIRACY THEORISTS are not authorised to participate in this discussion .
In other words : if your own set of ideologies conflicts with state doctrine , you effectively have no voice .
In fact , your voice has already been criminalised , and it is only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so far undetermined .
3 ) , The proposed NATIONWIDE DEBATE is in fact a fiction , when the definition of debate is : ‘ a regulated discussion between opposing views.
’ What ’ s more , there can be no debate without FREE SPEECH , which it is implied , does not exist anymore , because the war on MISINFORMATION and the ANTI-VACCINATION CONSPIRACY THEORISTS has established that the principle of free speech is , as a result of the threat of COVID , no longer permissible .
As the Met ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ side of the DEBATE has already been silenced and criminalised .
Needless to say , the DEBATE does not involve the other side of the DEBATE .
This in turn implies that what is being proposed here is in fact a witch hunt and not a DEBATE .
4 ) , An important legal precedent has now been established that overrides the principle of ‘ innocent until Proven guilty.
’ due to the implied guilt of ‘ ANTI-VACCINATION CONSPIRACY THEORISTS , without the enactment of legislation .
In other words , this witch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ convened .
We can therefore assume that some kind of Kangaroo Court has taken place behind closed doors , without scrutiny or DEBATE from the legislative or judicial branches of government .
This in turn implies that the legal process for enacting laws is surpassed by arbitrary policing by preference .
5 ) .
Despite the word ‘ NATIONWIDE ’ implying an open and transparent culture of DEBATE for everyone , as we have already established : the DEBATE will be mediated and directed by a small constituent belonging to one side of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ branch of government ( the police ) , and its public relations agency ( the media ) .
6 ) , The emergency powers which the government granted itself back in March , under the Public Health ( Control of Disease Act ) 1984 and the Coronavirus Act 2020 , not only abolished debates and scrutiny in parliament , these measures dissolved parliament from 650 MP ’ s to 50 MP ’ s .
Therefore , If the constitutional affairs of this country can not be determined by lawmakers in parliament through DEBATE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ population would be invited into such a DEBATE .
Therefore what is implicitly meant by the word DEBATE is official diktat .
7 ) .
The notion that MISINFORMATION COULD COST PEOPLE ’ S LIVES , is one of the most dangerous legal propositions in the history of democracy .
Implying the government has decreed a new category of criminal activity , equivalent to thought-crime .
Granting the government powers to regulate our thoughts and communications .
If it can be argued that a person could be killed by misinformation , then the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ premeditation ’ , ‘ motive ’ , and in turn ‘ guilt ’ , are transformed into something else , and each of these parameters of guilt could be preceded by ‘ thought ’ or ‘ word ’ , as an incitement to cause injury or death .
This kind of legal precedent could therefore become an important weapon of censorship , the likes of which has not been attempted previously , and Orwell ’ s concept of Thought Crime might become a reality in the 21st century .
The intervention of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this debate is especially alarming , because it presents evidence that the state is looking to brand anyone questioning the official narrative , with what it deems MISINFORMATION , as a terrorist .
8 ) .
All systems of ideological control are concerned with dissolving the power of their opposition .
Whether a political party looking to gain more seats in parliament or the Chinese Communist Party ( CCP ) prohibiting other political parties altogether .
The idea that a CONSPIRACY THEORIST presents a threat to people ’ s lives , grants unprecedented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , criminalise and prosecute its opposition .
Unlike apartheid in South Africa – where a social segment was discrimanated against because of the colour of their skin – a conspiracy theorist is not identifiable by any incontrovertible features , and are instead singled out on the basis of the governments interpretation of their dissenting ideological stance .
It could therefore be argued that anyone disagreeing with the state , is in fact a CONSPIRACY THEORIST and open to prosecution .
*** This article was originally published at Dustin Broadbery ’ s blog www.thecogent.org @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV

By
Whoever controls the ideological landscape controls the world.
.
Dustin Broadbery
21st Century Wire
The following quotes are from the Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Neil Basu, published in the Evening Standard on 19th November . I have highlighted some keywords in capitals which I will refer to later in the analysis.
“Britain’s top counter-terrorism officer today called for a NATIONWIDE DEBATE on the introduction of new laws to punish people who spread ANTI-VACCINATION CONSPIRACY THEORIES.”
“Met Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu said that there should be a DISCUSSION about whether it is “the correct thing for society to allow” people to spread “MISINFORMATION THAT COULD COST PEOPLE’S LIVES” as he responded to concern that false claims online could undermine the take up of Covid-19 vaccines.”
“There is a DEBATE FOR SOCIETY to have about FREE SPEECH and responsibility and people who are spreading misinformation that could cost people’s lives”
Do you see what they’re trying to achieve?
This propagandised message from the Met is attempting to reconstruct the ideological landscape, reframe the parameters of what a debate is, reclassify free speech, weaponise information, and obfuscate the important legal principle: ‘Innocent until proven guilty.’
In other words, the government is attempting to whitewash free speech towards the kind of one world ideology that was endemic in the former Soviet Union, where thinking contrary to the ideology of the Communist Party was criminalised.
But there is something even more odious concealed within this Goebbelsian public service announcement: here we have a senior police officer using threatening language to intimidate and shakedown the general population.
This is on the very same day that Boris Johnson flexed his own military muscle, announcing: record defence spending for laser guns, direct energy weapons, an artificial intelligence agency and the creation of a national cyber force (a group of computer hackers to conduct offensive operations).
Offensive operations against who exactly?
Britain is not currently at war, but according to the Assistant Commissioner of the MET, the government is waging an ideological war against anti vaccination conspiracy theorists. Ideological wars of this nature typically take place online, which is where much of the government’s military budget is being invested.
What does that tell us about who the government is at war with?
These strong arm tactics by a fledgling totalitarian regime, learning its trade, could be interpreted as coercion against the British public, and it is likely that the government is not only targeting dissenters, skeptics or those unwilling to wear the uniform of the Red Army, they are in fact threatening the entire population.
We can therefore interpret the stern warning from the Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, as follows:
1), DEBATES and DISCUSSIONS are permissible only when it comes to determining the extent of punishment to be served on those publicly voicing concerns or questioning the legitimacy or safety of vaccinations.
2), Despite the fact that a DEBATE and DISCUSSION is being proposed and this DEBATE is apparently open to all (NATIONWIDE), ANTI-VACCINATION CONSPIRACY THEORISTS are not authorised to participate in this discussion. In other words: if your own set of ideologies conflicts with state doctrine, you effectively have no voice. In fact, your voice has already been criminalised, and it is only the extent of your punishment that is so far undetermined.
3), The proposed NATIONWIDE DEBATE is in fact a fiction, when the definition of debate is: ‘a regulated discussion between opposing views.’ What’s more, there can be no debate without FREE SPEECH, which it is implied, does not exist anymore, because the war on MISINFORMATION and the ANTI-VACCINATION CONSPIRACY THEORISTS has established that the principle of free speech is, as a result of the threat of COVID, no longer permissible. As the Met’s Assistant Commissioner points out: one side of the DEBATE has already been silenced and criminalised. Needless to say, the DEBATE does not involve the other side of the DEBATE. This in turn implies that what is being proposed here is in fact a witch hunt and not a DEBATE.
4), An important legal precedent has now been established that overrides the principle of ‘innocent until Proven guilty.’ due to the implied guilt of ‘ANTI-VACCINATION CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, without the enactment of legislation. In other words, this witch hunt commenced before the rule of law convened. We can therefore assume that some kind of Kangaroo Court has taken place behind closed doors, without scrutiny or DEBATE from the legislative or judicial branches of government. This in turn implies that the legal process for enacting laws is surpassed by arbitrary policing by preference.
5). Despite the word ‘NATIONWIDE’ implying an open and transparent culture of DEBATE for everyone, as we have already established: the DEBATE will be mediated and directed by a small constituent belonging to one side of the DEBATE. Namely, the executive branch of government (the police), and its public relations agency (the media).
6), The emergency powers which the government granted itself back in March, under the Public Health (Control of Disease Act) 1984 and the Coronavirus Act 2020, not only abolished debates and scrutiny in parliament, these measures dissolved parliament from 650 MP’s to 50 MP’s. Therefore, If the constitutional affairs of this country cannot be determined by lawmakers in parliament through DEBATE, it is improbable that the general population would be invited into such a DEBATE. Therefore what is implicitly meant by the word DEBATE is official diktat.
7). The notion that MISINFORMATION COULD COST PEOPLE’S LIVES, is one of the most dangerous legal propositions in the history of democracy. Implying the government has decreed a new category of criminal activity, equivalent to thought-crime. Granting the government powers to regulate our thoughts and communications. If it can be argued that a person could be killed by misinformation, then the very principles of ‘intent,’ ‘premeditation’, ‘motive’, and in turn ‘guilt’, are transformed into something else, and each of these parameters of guilt could be preceded by ‘thought’ or ‘word’, as an incitement to cause injury or death. This kind of legal precedent could therefore become an important weapon of censorship, the likes of which has not been attempted previously, and Orwell’s concept of Thought Crime might become a reality in the 21st century. The intervention of Britain’s top anti-terrorist officer in this debate is especially alarming, because it presents evidence that the state is looking to brand anyone questioning the official narrative, with what it deems MISINFORMATION, as a terrorist.
8). All systems of ideological control are concerned with dissolving the power of their opposition. Whether a political party looking to gain more seats in parliament or the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) prohibiting other political parties altogether. The idea that a CONSPIRACY THEORIST presents a threat to people’s lives, grants unprecedented emergency powers to the government to censor, criminalise and prosecute its opposition. Unlike apartheid in South Africa – where a social segment was discrimanated against because of the colour of their skin – a conspiracy theorist is not identifiable by any incontrovertible features, and are instead singled out on the basis of the governments interpretation of their dissenting ideological stance.
It could therefore be argued that anyone disagreeing with the state, is in fact a CONSPIRACY THEORIST and open to prosecution.
***
This article was originally published at Dustin Broadbery’s blog www.thecogent.org. Follow him on Twitter @TheCogent1
READ MORE FREE SPEECH NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Free Speech Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-11-25--New York Gym Owner Rips Up His $15K Government Fine on Live TV

It ’ s now obvious that the most draconian state in America for lockdown is New York , as Governor Andrew Cuomo and NYC Mayor Bill de Blassio work in concert to try and shutter their state ’ s economy and keep citizens under house arrest , supposedly to keep people “ safe from the virus.
” This is spelling disaster for millions of New Yorkers now facing social and financial ruin .
The problem is the numbers do not add up – neither the epidemiological numbers , nor the economic ones .
One business owner fought back this week @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gym in Buffalo took to the airwaves this week to make his protest known , as he ripped up his $ 15,000 fine issued by the Erie County Health Department .
His protest has jarred state officials fearing other lawful businesses may also rebel against the state ’ s authoritarian diktats .
BUFFALO ( WKBW ) — The Erie County Health Department confirms it has fined Robby Dinero , the owner of Athletes Unleashed in Orchard Park , after a confrontation with health sanitarians .
Dinero told Fox News on Tuesday that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then appeared to rip up the fine up on live television .
According to a spokesperson for the ECDOH , “ our department delivered a stipulation and fine to that facility today.
” Dinero was hosting a protest inside Athletes Unleashed Friday night for local business owners concerned about their livelihood after the State shut down portions of Erie County .
Acting on a tip , representatives from the Erie County Department of Health and deputies from the Erie County Sheriff ’ s office , showed up to Athletes Unleashed to investigate .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ health sanitarians came onto private property , and had no business being there .
“ They found out they messed with the wrong bunch of patriots , ” said Dinero in a previous interview with 7 Eyewitness News .
“ I ’ m not here to argue with the Governor or the County Executive about spike rates—I don ’ t care , ” he said .
“ Freedom can never be subjugated to fear , ” he said .
Watch : Erie County Comptroller Stefan Mychajliw released a statement on the situation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mark Poloncarz crossed a line .
Punitively punishing a small business owner that served our country is despicable .
People are fed up .
The resistance against power hungry politicians destroying businesses with arbitrary COVID rules they make up as they go along has begun .
Enough is enough .
Mark Poloncarz is a bully that cares more about shutting down the economy , closing schools , regulating churches and damaging families than protecting the health of our community.
” During Dinero ’ s interview with Fox News , he says the restrictions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on our liberty goes too far .
We were born with inalienable rights bestowed on us by our creator .
They are guaranteed by the Constitution , specifically the Bill of Rights , ” says Dinero on Fox News .
“ Our freedom can not end where people ’ s fear starts.
” A GoFundMe has also been created to help pay Dinero ’ s fine .
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV

By
It’s now obvious that the most draconian state in America for lockdown is New York, as Governor Andrew Cuomo and NYC Mayor Bill de Blassio work in concert to try and shutter their state’s economy and keep citizens under house arrest, supposedly to keep people “safe from the virus.” This is spelling disaster for millions of New Yorkers now facing social and financial ruin. The problem is the numbers do not add up – neither the epidemiological numbers, nor the economic ones.
One business owner fought back this week. The owner of of Athletes Unleased gym in Buffalo took to the airwaves this week to make his protest known, as he ripped up his $15,000 fine issued by the Erie County Health Department. His protest has jarred state officials fearing other lawful businesses may also rebel against the state’s authoritarian diktats.
WKBW reports…
BUFFALO (WKBW) — The Erie County Health Department confirms it has fined Robby Dinero, the owner of Athletes Unleashed in Orchard Park, after a confrontation with health sanitarians. Dinero told Fox News on Tuesday that the fine was for $15,000. Dinero then appeared to rip up the fine up on live television.
According to a spokesperson for the ECDOH, “our department delivered a stipulation and fine to that facility today.”
Dinero was hosting a protest inside Athletes Unleashed Friday night for local business owners concerned about their livelihood after the State shut down portions of Erie County. Acting on a tip, representatives from the Erie County Department of Health and deputies from the Erie County Sheriff’s office, showed up to Athletes Unleashed to investigate.
Dinero told 7 Eyewitness News that the health sanitarians came onto private property, and had no business being there.
“They found out they messed with the wrong bunch of patriots,” said Dinero in a previous interview with 7 Eyewitness News. “I’m not here to argue with the Governor or the County Executive about spike rates—I don’t care,” he said. “Freedom can never be subjugated to fear,” he said. Watch:
Erie County Comptroller Stefan Mychajliw released a statement on the situation. It reads, in part:
“Mark Poloncarz crossed a line. Punitively punishing a small business owner that served our country is despicable. People are fed up. The resistance against power hungry politicians destroying businesses with arbitrary COVID rules they make up as they go along has begun. Enough is enough. Mark Poloncarz is a bully that cares more about shutting down the economy, closing schools, regulating churches and damaging families than protecting the health of our community.”
During Dinero’s interview with Fox News, he says the restrictions go too far.
“Any infringement on our liberty goes too far. We were born with inalienable rights bestowed on us by our creator. They are guaranteed by the Constitution, specifically the Bill of Rights,” says Dinero on Fox News. “Our freedom cannot end where people’s fear starts.”
A GoFundMe has also been created to help pay Dinero’s fine.
READ MORE LOCKDOWN NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Lockdown Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-11-25--Peter Hitchens: ‘People Need to Stop Swallowing This Garbage of COVID Restrictions’

UK health secretary Matt Hancock warned that his government ’ s Covid measures will be needed through the winter despite @ @ @ @ @ .
British journalist and historian Peter Hitchens responded to the government saying , “ Unless @ @ @ @ @ was wrong from the start , we ’ re stuck with it until at least @ @ @ @ @ possibly forever.
” In this segment , Peter Hitchens talks with TalkRadio host Mike Graham @ @ @ @ @ government ’ s failed lockdown policy .
Watch : SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & @ @ @ @ @

By
UK health secretary Matt Hancock warned that his government’s Covid measures will be needed through the winter despite dropping ICU and death figures. British journalist and historian Peter Hitchens responded to the government saying, “Unless we can show this thing was wrong from the start, we’re stuck with it until at least the spring, and quite possibly forever.”
In this segment, Peter Hitchens talks with TalkRadio host Mike Graham about the futility of the government’s failed lockdown policy. Watch:
READ MORE LOCKDOWN NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Lockdown Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-11-25--UKC News: ‘Get Ready for a Vaccine Debacle’

It ’ s now clear that the British government has gone all-in on vaccines as the thing which can rescue @ @ @ @ @ the last nine months .
The only problem is , their break-neck push for a @ @ @ @ @ increasingly problematic and will very likely mimic the failed H1NI Swine Flu disaster and the @ @ @ @ @ ’ s money-spinning flu jab .
Meanwhile , the MSM is still shilling for Orwellian @ @ @ @ @ Johnson ’ s government has revived its old plan to allow broadcasting regulator Ofcom to @ @ @ @ @ video sharing platforms.
” All this and more .
Co-hosts Brian Gerrish , Mike Robinson @ @ @ @ @ early week news round-up .
Watch : SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A @ @ @

By
It’s now clear that the British government has gone all-in on vaccines as the thing which can rescue their suicidal lockdown policies over the last nine months. The only problem is, their break-neck push for a mass vaccination campaign is looking increasingly problematic and will very likely mimic the failed H1NI Swine Flu disaster and the perennial failure of Big Pharma’s money-spinning flu jab. Meanwhile, the MSM is still shilling for Orwellian immunity passports, and Boris Johnson’s government has revived its old plan to allow broadcasting regulator Ofcom to censor YouTube and other “video sharing platforms.” All this and more.
Co-hosts Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson and David Scott with the early week news round-up. Watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlNQoKUSyYY
READ MORE VACCINE NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Vaccine Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-11-25--John Anderson Talks with Laurence Fox on ‘Reclaiming British Culture’

Eminent actor and musician Laurence Fox , known for his many distinguished roles in film and television , has recently @ @ @ @ @ called Reclaim , which sets out to uphold fundamental principles like free speech , defend @ @ @ @ @ Marxism and promote a positive image of the United Kingdom and its many achievements .
@ @ @ @ @ John Anderson hosts an in-depth conversation with Laurence Fox the culture wars and how people @ @ @ @ @ to overcome the current cultural impasse .
Watch : SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & @ @ @ @ @

By
Eminent actor and musician Laurence Fox, known for his many distinguished roles in film and television, has recently launched a new political party called Reclaim, which sets out to uphold fundamental principles like free speech, defend British institutions from creeping cultural Marxism and promote a positive image of the United Kingdom and its many achievements.
Former Australian Deputy Prime Minister John Anderson hosts an in-depth conversation with Laurence Fox the culture wars and how people and society can come together to overcome the current cultural impasse. Watch:
READ MORE CULTURE WARS NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Culture Wars Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-11-24--Tucker: The System Was Rigged Against One Candidate

The post-mortem on this election goes deeper by the day .
Between using the COVID to rewrite election laws , @ @ @ @ @ and Big Tech meddling and censoring , the deck was overwhelmingly stacked against the incumbent @ @ @ @ @ what just happened , albeit in plain sight .
Watch : SUPPORT OUR WORK BY @ @ @ @ @ @ 21WIRE.TV

By
The post-mortem on this election goes deeper by the day. Between using the COVID to rewrite election laws, continuous one-sided press coverage, and Big Tech meddling and censoring, the deck was overwhelmingly stacked against the incumbent.
Host Tucker Carlson explains what just happened, albeit in plain sight. Watch:
Visit 2020 Election Edge LIVE Blog Here
READ MORE 2020 ELECTION NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire 2020 Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-11-24--How Malta’s a Thriving Civilization Collapsed 4,000 Years Ago

The mysteries of an ancient civilization that survived for more than a millennium on the island of Malta—and then collapsed within two generations—have been unravelled by archaeologists who analyzed pollen buried deep within the earth and ancient DNA from skulls and bones .
It ’ s part of a field of work that is expanding the use of archaeological techniques into environments where they were previously thought to be unusable .
The Temple Culture of the Maltese archipelago in the Mediterranean began nearly 6,000 years ago and at its height probably numbered several thousand people—far denser than the people of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The island people constructed elaborate sacred sites , such as the famous Ġgantija temple complex , and their buildings are among the earliest free-standing buildings known .
But , after 1,500 years , they were gone .
Caroline Malone , prehistory specialist at Queen ’ s University Belfast , Northern Ireland , wanted to understand how the fragile island ecology sustained the people for so long despite drought , violent storms , and soil erosion—and why it ultimately failed .
She ran an ambitious project , Fragsus , which drew on multiple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drilled earth cores ranging from eight to 30 meters deep , dating the sediment using carbon dating to understand which time period it referred to .
They counted the pollen at two-centimeter intervals and analyzed individual pollen grains using chemical signatures imprinted by the surrounding environment to understand what nutrients the parent plants were absorbing from the ground .
Molluscs embedded in the soil revealed glimpses of the landscape since “ snails , ” Malone said , “ are very particular about where they live and don ’ t move far.
” Meanwhile @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tear on tens of thousands of human bones from a burial site to understand the islanders ’ lifestyles .
The team broke new ground by analyzing bone with a technique called ancient DNA ( aDNA ) analysis , says Malone .
It had previously been thought that the warmth of any climate south of the Alps would destroy such old DNA .
But it turned out that skulls buried at a relatively cool five meters ’ depth still harbored aDNA within thick bone behind the ear .
From what they ’ ve uncovered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ understood the importance of soil management to fend off starvation .
Within a hundred years of their arrival on the tiny , 316 square-kilometer archipelago they had felled most of the trees , exposing the ground to drastic erosion .
To survive , they reared dairy animals rather than prioritizing meat—killing off newborn livestock before they had a chance to graze .
They mixed livestock manure back into the soil and may even have made back-breaking journeys carting soil washed into the valleys back uphill to refresh the upland fields .
The evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ruts in the ground that may be cart tracks , as well as signs from the skeletons that soft tissue had sometimes been worn completely away by hard , repetitive activity .
Oddly , says Malone , they ate almost no fish .
To achieve such complex collaborative effort something powerful must have held the community together : the temples .
Until now , the Temple Culture was thought to have centered on the worship of a mother goddess , but Malone thinks it was more of a clubhouse culture , focused on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a deity—was revered .
In the complexes it is now clear that the people displayed their livestock and harvests on special benches and altars , feasted , and also stored food .
There is no skeletal evidence of violent death and no fortifications , said Malone .
Instead the society appears to have survived through cooperation and sharing .
Despite the society ’ s strength and success , as centuries passed the soil erosion and climate conditions worsened , as evidenced by the different types of pollen in the soil , the diminishing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bones wracked with evidence of dietary deficiencies .
In the final centuries of the Temple Culture , between 2600 BC and 2400 BC , half of those dying were children .
Other factors likely contributed , said Malone .
Adult skulls from this time are greatly varied , their DNA indicating the arrival of immigrants from as far as the Eurasian Steppes and sub-Saharan Africa , possibly causing population pressure and new diseases .
The decisive blow may have been an unknown catastrophe that occurred around 2350 BC , a period during which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the whole region suffered a catastrophic climate event—possibly a dust cloud caused by a volcanic eruption .
Islands can be used as laboratories for understanding change in the wider world , Malone says .
However , the geographical peculiarities of islands can also present problems by rendering conventional research techniques redundant .
In Spain ’ s Canary Islands , for example , ancient pollen is not well-preserved in the local terrain .
What ’ s more , many important plants on the islands—such as its emblematic laurel trees—produce no , or little , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also eroded other pieces of evidence , such as macrofossils .
Lea de Nascimento , a specialist in ecology at the Universidad de La Laguna in Tenerife said : “ We lack ( good preservation of ) all the conventional proxies.
” She wants to piece together the history of vegetation on the Canaries—in particular , what they were like before humans arrived over 2,000 years ago .
To do so , she is using a new palaeoecological technique called palaeoenvironmental DNA analysis… SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @ @

By
Aisling Irwin
Horizon Magazine
The mysteries of an ancient civilization that survived for more than a millennium on the island of Malta—and then collapsed within two generations—have been unravelled by archaeologists who analyzed pollen buried deep within the earth and ancient DNA from skulls and bones. It’s part of a field of work that is expanding the use of archaeological techniques into environments where they were previously thought to be unusable.
The Temple Culture of the Maltese archipelago in the Mediterranean began nearly 6,000 years ago and at its height probably numbered several thousand people—far denser than the people of mainland Europe could manage at the time. The island people constructed elaborate sacred sites, such as the famous Ġgantija temple complex, and their buildings are among the earliest free-standing buildings known. But, after 1,500 years, they were gone.
Islands can be used as laboratories for understanding change in the wider world.
Caroline Malone, prehistory specialist at Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland, wanted to understand how the fragile island ecology sustained the people for so long despite drought, violent storms, and soil erosion—and why it ultimately failed. She ran an ambitious project, Fragsus, which drew on multiple tools to find some answers. Scientists drilled earth cores ranging from eight to 30 meters deep, dating the sediment using carbon dating to understand which time period it referred to. They counted the pollen at two-centimeter intervals and analyzed individual pollen grains using chemical signatures imprinted by the surrounding environment to understand what nutrients the parent plants were absorbing from the ground. Molluscs embedded in the soil revealed glimpses of the landscape since “snails,” Malone said, “are very particular about where they live and don’t move far.”
Meanwhile, other specialists assessed the wear and tear on tens of thousands of human bones from a burial site to understand the islanders’ lifestyles. The team broke new ground by analyzing bone with a technique called ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis, says Malone. It had previously been thought that the warmth of any climate south of the Alps would destroy such old DNA. But it turned out that skulls buried at a relatively cool five meters’ depth still harbored aDNA within thick bone behind the ear.
From what they’ve uncovered, the team thinks that these people understood the importance of soil management to fend off starvation. Within a hundred years of their arrival on the tiny, 316 square-kilometer archipelago they had felled most of the trees, exposing the ground to drastic erosion.
To survive, they reared dairy animals rather than prioritizing meat—killing off newborn livestock before they had a chance to graze. They mixed livestock manure back into the soil and may even have made back-breaking journeys carting soil washed into the valleys back uphill to refresh the upland fields. The evidence for this lies in strange, parallel ruts in the ground that may be cart tracks, as well as signs from the skeletons that soft tissue had sometimes been worn completely away by hard, repetitive activity. Oddly, says Malone, they ate almost no fish.
To achieve such complex collaborative effort something powerful must have held the community together: the temples. Until now, the Temple Culture was thought to have centered on the worship of a mother goddess, but Malone thinks it was more of a clubhouse culture, focused on ritual and feasting but where food—rather than a deity—was revered. In the complexes it is now clear that the people displayed their livestock and harvests on special benches and altars, feasted, and also stored food. There is no skeletal evidence of violent death and no fortifications, said Malone. Instead the society appears to have survived through cooperation and sharing.
Despite the society’s strength and success, as centuries passed the soil erosion and climate conditions worsened, as evidenced by the different types of pollen in the soil, the diminishing number of tree remains and the human bones wracked with evidence of dietary deficiencies. In the final centuries of the Temple Culture, between 2600 BC and 2400 BC, half of those dying were children. Other factors likely contributed, said Malone. Adult skulls from this time are greatly varied, their DNA indicating the arrival of immigrants from as far as the Eurasian Steppes and sub-Saharan Africa, possibly causing population pressure and new diseases.
The decisive blow may have been an unknown catastrophe that occurred around 2350 BC, a period during which, according to tree ring analysis, the whole region suffered a catastrophic climate event—possibly a dust cloud caused by a volcanic eruption.
Islands can be used as laboratories for understanding change in the wider world, Malone says. However, the geographical peculiarities of islands can also present problems by rendering conventional research techniques redundant. In Spain’s Canary Islands, for example, ancient pollen is not well-preserved in the local terrain. What’s more, many important plants on the islands—such as its emblematic laurel trees—produce no, or little, pollen, and the environmental conditions have also eroded other pieces of evidence, such as macrofossils.
Lea de Nascimento, a specialist in ecology at the Universidad de La Laguna in Tenerife said: “We lack (good preservation of) all the conventional proxies.” She wants to piece together the history of vegetation on the Canaries—in particular, what they were like before humans arrived over 2,000 years ago. To do so, she is using a new palaeoecological technique called palaeoenvironmental DNA analysis…
Continue this story at Horizon Magazine
READ MORE HISTORY NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire History Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV