21stcenturywire--2020-12-05--Rishi Sunak Pressured to Reveal Links to Firm with £380m Stake in Vaccine Mogul Moderna

When it comes to the government ’ s preferred vaccine manufactures , all the firms are riddled with scandals , but none more so than biotechnology company Moderna .
From its not-so-humble beginnings being bankrolled by the planet ’ s most wealthy insider investment funds , it was referred to as “ biotech ’ s most secretive startups.
” We also just learned this week this vaccine mogul has already begun testing its experimental mRNA COVID vaccine on children as young as 12 .
Also , drug giant Pfizer has already started testing in order to “ see its effects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ create opportunities to guarantee profits for these transnational giants by pre-ordering tens of millions of doses of unproven COVID-19 vaccines , the company ’ s executives have been busy getting rich of their initial share bounce , selling off shares at record levels , as NPR reports : “ Whether the coronavirus vaccine developed by Moderna succeeds or not , executives at the small biotech company have already made tens of millions of dollars by cashing in their stock .
An NPR examination of official company disclosures has revealed additional irregularities and potential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ probe Boris Johnson ’ s government for links to Big Pharma of all of its ministers , science advisors and coronavirus task force members – they ’ ll no doubt find copious amounts of evidence revealing their real conflicts of interest with the predatory pharmaceutical industry .
This has already been proven with Johnson ’ s two chief medical and science advisors and lockdown architects Chris Whitty and Sir Patrick Vallance .
Tory Chancellor Rishi Sunak , one of the architects of his government ’ s gutting of the country ’ s economy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and SME business sector , middle and workings classes – also appears to have a potentially jarring conflict of interest relating to Moderna , one of his government ’ s main corporate partners .
Labour has demanded to know if Rishi Sunak still has links to a firm with a £380million stake in US Covid-19 vaccine maker Moderna .
The Chancellor was a founder of investment firm Theleme Partners before leaving for politics in 2013 .
Theleme gained after Moderna ’ s value soared from £4.7billion to £32bn due to its vaccine success @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of its jab this month .
Mr Sunak ’ s investments are in a “ blind trust ” , which protects against conflicts of interest as he himself does not know what he is invested in .
James Murray , Shadow Financial Secretary to the Treasury , urged Mr Sunak to reveal any links to Moderna , saying : “ If [ he ] has nothing to hide , he should come clean.
” The Cabinet Office has said it was satisfied with what Mr Sunak put in the register of financial interests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s wife Akshata Murty , who has £430million of shares in family business Infosys , is richer than the Queen , worth £350 million , according to the Sunday Times Rich List .
The Moderna row comes amid questions after Infosys won Government contracts worth £22million .
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV

By
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.
When it comes to the government’s preferred vaccine manufactures, all the firms are riddled with scandals, but none more so than biotechnology company Moderna.
From its not-so-humble beginnings being bankrolled by the planet’s most wealthy insider investment funds, it was referred to as “biotech’s most secretive startups.”
We also just learned this week this vaccine mogul has already begun testing its experimental mRNA COVID vaccine on children as young as 12.
Also, drug giant Pfizer has already started testing in order to “see its effects in teens and children.”
As governments create opportunities to guarantee profits for these transnational giants by pre-ordering tens of millions of doses of unproven COVID-19 vaccines, the company’s executives have been busy getting rich of their initial share bounce, selling off shares at record levels, as NPR reports:
“Whether the coronavirus vaccine developed by Moderna succeeds or not, executives at the small biotech company have already made tens of millions of dollars by cashing in their stock. An NPR examination of official company disclosures has revealed additional irregularities and potential warning signs.”
If one was to probe Boris Johnson’s government for links to Big Pharma of all of its ministers, science advisors and coronavirus task force members – they’ll no doubt find copious amounts of evidence revealing their real conflicts of interest with the predatory pharmaceutical industry. This has already been proven with Johnson’s two chief medical and science advisors and lockdown architects Chris Whitty and Sir Patrick Vallance.
Tory Chancellor Rishi Sunak, one of the architects of his government’s gutting of the country’s economy and crushing of its entire High Street and SME business sector, middle and workings classes – also appears to have a potentially jarring conflict of interest relating to Moderna, one of his government’s main corporate partners.
The Mirror reports…
Labour has demanded to know if Rishi Sunak still has links to a firm with a £380million stake in US Covid-19 vaccine maker Moderna.
The Chancellor was a founder of investment firm Theleme Partners before leaving for politics in 2013.
Theleme gained after Moderna’s value soared from £4.7billion to £32bn due to its vaccine success.
The Government bought five million doses of its jab this month. Mr Sunak’s investments are in a “blind trust”, which protects against conflicts of interest as he himself does not know what he is invested in.
James Murray, Shadow Financial Secretary to the Treasury, urged Mr Sunak to reveal any links to Moderna, saying: “If [he] has nothing to hide, he should come clean.”
The Cabinet Office has said it was satisfied with what Mr Sunak put in the register of financial interests.
Meanwhile, it emerged Mr Sunak’s wife Akshata Murty, who has £430million of shares in family business Infosys, is richer than the Queen, worth £350 million, according to the Sunday Times Rich List.
The Moderna row comes amid questions after Infosys won Government contracts worth £22million.
***
READ MORE CORONAVIRUS NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Coronavirus Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-12-06--Episode #352 – ‘Revenge of the Nerds’ with guest Basil Valentine

Episode # 352 of SUNDAY WIRE SHOW resumes on this week , December 6 , 2020 with host Patrick Henningsen , broadcasting LIVE on the Alternate Current Radio Network ( ACR ) … 4pm-7pm UK Time ( Daylight Savings ) | 12pm-3pm EST ( US ) | 9am-12pm PST ( US ) This week the SUNDAY WIRE broadcasts LIVE on ACR this week with host Patrick Henningsen , covering the top stories in the US , Europe and internationally .
Now more than ever , the both the political and media establishments are pushing the COVID-19 as the ‘ path @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lockdowns , school shutdowns , restricted travel and so on .
But are they correct ?
We ’ re told this is a consensus , but is it ?
Never before in history has there been so much talk of mandatory vaccinations , and all for a seasonal respiratory virus with at least a 99.7 % survival rate of those who have actually fallen ill from it .
Should we continue to put our faith and lives in the hands of men on TV in white doctors coats , or multi billionaire computer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
In the final hour , we ’ ll connect with our Roving Correspondent for Culture & Sport , Basil Valentine , for his take on this week ’ s biggest stories at home and away .
All this and much , more .
Enjoy the show… PLEASE HELP SUPPORT OUR HERE AND ALSO BECOME A TEAM MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV *NOTE : THIS EPISODE MAY CONTAIN STRONG LANGUAGE AND MATURE THEMES*

By
Episode #352 of SUNDAY WIRE SHOW resumes on this week, December 6, 2020 with host Patrick Henningsen, broadcasting LIVE on the Alternate Current Radio Network (ACR)…
LISTEN LIVE ON THIS PAGE – START TIMES:
4pm-7pm UK Time (Daylight Savings) | 12pm-3pm EST (US) | 9am-12pm PST (US)
This week the SUNDAY WIRE broadcasts LIVE on ACR this week with host Patrick Henningsen, covering the top stories in the US, Europe and internationally. Now more than ever, the both the political and media establishments are pushing the COVID-19 as the ‘path to freedom’ – freedom from government-imposed lockdowns, school shutdowns, restricted travel and so on. But are they correct? We’re told this is a consensus, but is it? Never before in history has there been so much talk of mandatory vaccinations, and all for a seasonal respiratory virus with at least a 99.7% survival rate of those who have actually fallen ill from it. Should we continue to put our faith and lives in the hands of men on TV in white doctors coats, or multi billionaire computer nerds with an unusual global savior complex? In the final hour, we’ll connect with our Roving Correspondent for Culture & Sport, Basil Valentine, for his take on this week’s biggest stories at home and away. All this and much, more. Enjoy the show…
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT OUR
WINTER FUNDRAISING DRIVE HERE
AND ALSO BECOME A TEAM MEMBER @21WIRE.TV
*NOTE: THIS EPISODE MAY CONTAIN STRONG LANGUAGE AND MATURE THEMES*
Download the most recent Episode #352
Sunday Wire Radio Show Archives


21stcenturywire--2020-12-07--UN Report: 233,000 Yemenis Dead After 6-Year Saudi-US Coalition Bombings

The War on Yemen continues to be very much a ‘ forgotten war ’ – six years on from when @ @ @ @ @ began bombing the country endlessly .
This has resulted in the deaths of an estimated @ @ @ @ @ in a recent United Nations report .
It ’ s a painful reminder , even @ @ @ @ @ daily onslaught of COVID-related ‘ grim milestones ’ peddled by mainstream media , that an @ @ @ @ @ has seen more death and destruction visited upon it by foreign invaders than any ‘ @ @ @ @ @ : Almost a quarter of a million people have died in Yemen ’ s war @ @ @ @ @ the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs ( OCHA ) said on its website on Tuesday , @ @ @ @ @ a conflict that has ravaged Yemen ’ s economy and created the world ’ s @ @ @ @ @ pictures from the ground in Yemen tell the horrific story on its own – no @ @ @ @ @ HELP SUPPORT OUR WINTER FUNDRAISING DRIVE HERE

By
The War on Yemen continues to be very much a ‘forgotten war’ – six years on from when the United States-Saudi Arabia coalition began bombing the country endlessly. This has resulted in the deaths of an estimated 233,000 people, now admitted in a recent United Nations report.
It’s a painful reminder, even in the midst of a daily onslaught of COVID-related ‘grim milestones’ peddled by mainstream media, that an entire population of a country has seen more death and destruction visited upon it by foreign invaders than any ‘pandemic’ could ever do:
Almost a quarter of a million people have died in Yemen’s war, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said on its website on Tuesday, confirming the huge toll from a conflict that has ravaged Yemen’s economy and created the world’s worst humanitarian crisis.
The pictures from the ground in Yemen tell the horrific story on its own – no media spin required:
https://twitter.com/Bridge__z/status/1334447723173404674
READ MORE YEMEN NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Yemen Files
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT OUR WINTER FUNDRAISING DRIVE HERE


21stcenturywire--2020-12-07--REVEALED: The Hypocrisy of Lockdowns Across America

The new and special dictatorial powers conferred to politicians and media by this pandemic are unprecedented in modern history .
Democratic Party ’ s presumptive winner Joe Biden took to the airwaves this past weekend in intimidating fashion , telling the American public that a further “ 250,000 more Americans will be dead ” in next 30 days , unless they follow his diktats and wear a mask everywhere and stay at home locked-down over the holiday season .
Biden offered so rational explanation as to how he came up with such a big number .
In his scathing attack @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not to travel to see their families for Christmas , as he employed a somewhat blunt emotional blackmail tactic , wildly claiming that “ with all the trouble you ’ re going through , you can not be traveling during these holidays , as much as you want to.
” Critics have accused him of using demagoguery to bully the public .
In Los Angeles , Democrat Mayor Eric Garcetti has declared that any movement outside of the home is now illegal and that residents will be subject to arrest unless they can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” or that they are going to purchase “ essential goods.
” In San Francisco , Democrat Mayor London Breed has declared all family holiday gatherings as “ super spreader events ” – parroting the widely held myth that every person is a potential ‘ asymptomatic spreader ’ of COVID 19 .
Like California Governor Gavin Newsom , Mayor Breed was caught dining at the ultra-luxurious 5-star French Laundry restaurant – while she was ordering her residents to lockdown .
Stephen Adler , the ultra-liberal Democrat Mayor of ultra liberal Austin , Texas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ordering his city tpo lockdown and stay at home – from a luxury resort in Cabo San Lucas , Mexico .
Host Tucker Carlson calls out the hypocrisy of COVID-19 lockdown polices by their liberal lawmakers across America .
Watch : SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV

By
The new and special dictatorial powers conferred to politicians and media by this pandemic are unprecedented in modern history.
Democratic Party’s presumptive winner Joe Biden took to the airwaves this past weekend in intimidating fashion, telling the American public that a further “250,000 more Americans will be dead” in next 30 days, unless they follow his diktats and wear a mask everywhere and stay at home locked-down over the holiday season. Biden offered so rational explanation as to how he came up with such a big number.
In his scathing attack on the public, Biden urged Americans not to travel to see their families for Christmas, as he employed a somewhat blunt emotional blackmail tactic, wildly claiming that “with all the trouble you’re going through, you cannot be traveling during these holidays, as much as you want to.” Critics have accused him of using demagoguery to bully the public.
In Los Angeles, Democrat Mayor Eric Garcetti has declared that any movement outside of the home is now illegal and that residents will be subject to arrest unless they can prove that their journey is “essential” or that they are going to purchase “essential goods.”
In San Francisco, Democrat Mayor London Breed has declared all family holiday gatherings as “super spreader events” – parroting the widely held myth that every person is a potential ‘asymptomatic spreader’ of COVID 19.
Like California Governor Gavin Newsom, Mayor Breed was caught dining at the ultra-luxurious 5-star French Laundry restaurant – while she was ordering her residents to lockdown.
Stephen Adler, the ultra-liberal Democrat Mayor of ultra liberal Austin, Texas, was caught delivering a video message ordering his city tpo lockdown and stay at home – from a luxury resort in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico.
Host Tucker Carlson calls out the hypocrisy of COVID-19 lockdown polices by their liberal lawmakers across America. Watch:
READ MORE COVID NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire COVID Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-12-07--Michigan Judge Orders Forensic Audit of 22 Dominion Machines

This past weekend saw the first positive sign in the effort for more accountability in electronic voting in the United States , after a Michigan State Court Administrative Office ordered Antrim County officials to preserve their election records , and to allow for proper forensic images to be taken from 22 of their Dominion Voting tabulators .
This is being hailed as the first of many investigative forays into the controversial and highly suspect electronic voting systems currently used across America since the year 2000 .
Ever since Joe Biden incredible 4am comeback on November 4th , the Trump campaign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ role of an electronic voting systems , namely Dominion Voting Systems , as being partly responsible for possible widespread election fraud in the United States .
The Trump team ’ s accusations range from networked security vulnerabilities , chain of custody of USB sticks on election night , to vote switching , percentage vote shaving , vote deletion , as well as ‘ inappropriate influence ‘ over the company by various Democratic Party operatives .
On every count , the mainstream media has automatically dismissed out of hand any concerns regarding the integrity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ systems .
The obvious question here is : why wouldn ’ t the corporate media be interested in such accusations when they themselves have flagged-up this same issue many times in the past ?
Remember when CRIMINAL # Elections RIGGING PR & Ads Campaign Pay4Play platform # CNN which ran ILLEGAL Suppression polling & LIED to all the voters & world actually exposed # Election machines like # Smartmatic & # Dominion back in 2006 even ?
Now they are LYING as CRIMINAL Accomplices pic.twitter.com/jm0dRotZOy This week , the Trump legal team finally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ systems front .
Trump campaign attorneys are celebrating after a Michigan judge ordered a forensic investigation of Dominion voting machines .
Attorney Jenna Ellis told “ Fox & Friends ” on Sunday morning that Circuit Judge Kevin Eisenheimer has given investigators eight hours to conduct a forensic examination of Dominion voting machines used by Antrim County , Michigan in the Nov. 3 election .
The Trump campaign ’ s senior legal advisor expects the results of the examination to be available in about 48 hours .
“ And that ’ ll tell us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ellis told Fox News .
The order stems from a case brought by a Michigan voter , William Baily , who claims ballots were damaged during a recount concerning a marijuana proposal that narrowly passed in Village of Central Lake , Michigan , Fox News reported .
While the order makes no mention of the presidential race , Antrim County ignited controversy after an error caused Joe Biden to be shown as the winner of the county .
But after correcting for the error , President Trump was determined to have won the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republican county clerk said human error was responsible for the mixup , and other election officials have said Dominion voting machines operated properly in the election .
Trump lawyer and former New York City Mayor Rudy Guiliani called the order a “ BIG WIN FOR HONEST ELECTIONS , ” alleging that Dominion spiked votes “ all over the state.
” A spokesperson for the county told the Detroit Free Press that forensic images will be collected of county precinct tabulators used in the Nov. 3 election .
The judge ’ s order further @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , preserve and protect all records in its possession used to tabulate votes in Antrim County , to not turn on the Dominion tabulator in its possession and to not connect the Dominion tabulator in its possession to the internet , ” according to Detroit News .
The error in Antrim County has raised concerns about the accuracy of Dominion Voting Systems , which were used in 47 Michigan counties on Nov. 3 .
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV

By
This past weekend saw the first positive sign in the effort for more accountability in electronic voting in the United States, after a Michigan State Court Administrative Office ordered Antrim County officials to preserve their election records, and to allow for proper forensic images to be taken from 22 of their Dominion Voting tabulators. This is being hailed as the first of many investigative forays into the controversial and highly suspect electronic voting systems currently used across America since the year 2000. Ever since Joe Biden incredible 4am comeback on November 4th, the Trump campaign’s legal team has criticized the role of an electronic voting systems, namely Dominion Voting Systems, as being partly responsible for possible widespread election fraud in the United States.
The Trump team’s accusations range from networked security vulnerabilities, chain of custody of USB sticks on election night, to vote switching, percentage vote shaving, vote deletion, as well as ‘inappropriate influence‘ over the company by various Democratic Party operatives. On every count, the mainstream media has automatically dismissed out of hand any concerns regarding the integrity of these and any other electronic voting systems. The obvious question here is: why wouldn’t the corporate media be interested in such accusations when they themselves have flagged-up this same issue many times in the past? https://twitter.com/AOECOIN/status/1335753079723937792?s=20 This week, the Trump legal team finally scored their first victory on the e-voting systems front.
Bronson Stocking from Townhall reports…
Trump campaign attorneys are celebrating after a Michigan judge ordered a forensic investigation of Dominion voting machines.
Attorney Jenna Ellis told “Fox & Friends” on Sunday morning that Circuit Judge Kevin Eisenheimer has given investigators eight hours to conduct a forensic examination of Dominion voting machines used by Antrim County, Michigan in the Nov. 3 election. The Trump campaign’s senior legal advisor expects the results of the examination to be available in about 48 hours.
“And that’ll tell us a lot about these machines,” Ellis told Fox News.
The order stems from a case brought by a Michigan voter, William Baily, who claims ballots were damaged during a recount concerning a marijuana proposal that narrowly passed in Village of Central Lake, Michigan, Fox News reported.
While the order makes no mention of the presidential race, Antrim County ignited controversy after an error caused Joe Biden to be shown as the winner of the county. But after correcting for the error, President Trump was determined to have won the county by several thousand votes. The Republican county clerk said human error was responsible for the mixup, and other election officials have said Dominion voting machines operated properly in the election.
BIG WIN FOR HONEST ELECTIONS. Antrim County Judge in Michigan orders forensic examination of 22 Dominion voting machines. This is where the untrustworthy Dominion machine flipped 6000 votes from Trump to Biden. Spiking of votes by Dominion happenned all over the state. — Rudy W. Giuliani (@RudyGiuliani) December 5, 2020
Trump lawyer and former New York City Mayor Rudy Guiliani called the order a “BIG WIN FOR HONEST ELECTIONS,” alleging that Dominion spiked votes “all over the state.”
A spokesperson for the county told the Detroit Free Press that forensic images will be collected of county precinct tabulators used in the Nov. 3 election. The judge’s order further instructs Antrim County officials to “maintain, preserve and protect all records in its possession used to tabulate votes in Antrim County, to not turn on the Dominion tabulator in its possession and to not connect the Dominion tabulator in its possession to the internet,” according to Detroit News.
The error in Antrim County has raised concerns about the accuracy of Dominion Voting Systems, which were used in 47 Michigan counties on Nov. 3.
Visit 2020 Election Edge LIVE Blog Here
READ MORE 2020 ELECTION NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire 2020 Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-12-08--Biden Nominates Raytheon Board Member for Secretary of Defense

With Biden ’ s pick of retired four-star Army Gen. Lloyd Austin to lead the Pentagon , it ’ s on to business as usual in Washington – the Business of War… According to a report from Politico , Joe Biden has picked retired Army Gen. Lloyd Austin to head the incoming administration ’ s Defense Department .
Austin served as the head of US Central Command ( CENTCOM ) from 2013 to 2016 , overseeing US operations in the Middle East .
After retiring from the Army in 2016 , Austin joined the board of Raytheon , one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also serves on the board of the Nucor Corporation , a major US steel producer , and Tenet Healthcare .
Since Austin has not been out of the military for seven years , he will require a waiver from Congress to take the position .
President Trump had to secure a waiver for Jim Mattis in 2017 , the current administration ’ s first Pentagon chief , who also served on the board of a US arms company before his appointment .
The Biden transition team was under fire from progressives over rumors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ head the Pentagon .
One of the gripes progressives had with Flournoy is her deep ties with the arms industry .
Flournoy serves on the board of the defense firm Booz Allen Hamilton and co-founded the Center for a New American Security ( CNAS ) , a hawkish think tank that receives hefty contributions from weapons makers .
In November , two progressive House Democrats penned a letter to Joe Biden , urging him not to appoint a secretary of defense who has previously worked in the weapons industry .
In the letter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Rep. Mark Pocan ( D-WI ) cited Trump ’ s appointment of Mattis and his successors Patrick Shanahan and Mark Esper , who also worked in the arms industry .
The Biden transition team was also under pressure from the Congressional Black Caucus to choose a black secretary of defense .
If appointed , Austin would be the first black Pentagon chief .
Reports said Biden was also considering former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson for the position .
Johnson , another black man , serves on the board of Lockheed Martin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DRIVE HERE

By
With Biden’s pick of retired four-star Army Gen. Lloyd Austin to lead the Pentagon, it’s on to business as usual in Washington – the Business of War…
Dave DeCamp from Antiwar.com reports…
According to a report from Politico, Joe Biden has picked retired Army Gen. Lloyd Austin to head the incoming administration’s Defense Department.
Austin served as the head of US Central Command (CENTCOM) from 2013 to 2016, overseeing US operations in the Middle East. After retiring from the Army in 2016, Austin joined the board of Raytheon, one of the largest US defense contractors. He also serves on the board of the Nucor Corporation, a major US steel producer, and Tenet Healthcare.
Since Austin has not been out of the military for seven years, he will require a waiver from Congress to take the position. President Trump had to secure a waiver for Jim Mattis in 2017, the current administration’s first Pentagon chief, who also served on the board of a US arms company before his appointment.
The Biden transition team was under fire from progressives over rumors that Michele Flournoy would be picked to head the Pentagon. One of the gripes progressives had with Flournoy is her deep ties with the arms industry. Flournoy serves on the board of the defense firm Booz Allen Hamilton and co-founded the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), a hawkish think tank that receives hefty contributions from weapons makers.
A sitting board member of military industrial contractor Raytheon should NOT be heading the Pentagon. Terrible choice. I hope progessives in Congress will speak up loudly. https://t.co/9P3l7iMDc7 — Marianne Williamson (@marwilliamson) December 8, 2020
In November, two progressive House Democrats penned a letter to Joe Biden, urging him not to appoint a secretary of defense who has previously worked in the weapons industry. In the letter, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) and Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI) cited Trump’s appointment of Mattis and his successors Patrick Shanahan and Mark Esper, who also worked in the arms industry.
The Biden transition team was also under pressure from the Congressional Black Caucus to choose a black secretary of defense. If appointed, Austin would be the first black Pentagon chief. Reports said Biden was also considering former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson for the position. Johnson, another black man, serves on the board of Lockheed Martin.
READ MORE PENTAGON NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Pentagon Files
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT OUR WINTER FUNDRAISING DRIVE HERE


21stcenturywire--2020-12-08--New Peer Review Report Finds PCR Test ‘Useless’, Further Debunking Asymptomatic ‘Superspreader’ Theo

New Peer Review Report Finds PCR Test ‘Useless’, Further Debunking Asymptomatic ‘Superspreader’ Theory

Now more than ever , it ’ s time to do the one thing that COVID-aligned media have been asking for almost a year now – follow the science .
Well , here it is for all the world to see .
Not only is the following scientific evidence damning for the ‘ New Normal ’ lockdown culture that ’ s been perpetuated , the primary method for reporting ‘ cases ’ that public health officials and politicians have been using to wield their newfound power – the PCR test – has just been summarily rendered “ useless ” by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new report .
The “ Corman-Drosten Review Report “ was authored by the International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences ( ICSLS ) , and is an external peer review report that reveals ’ 10 fatal flaws ’ in the PCR test – the main test used for COVID : The authors reference the term “ useless ” eight different times in their report and concluded that a major consequence of the flawed PCR testing protocol is false positives .
Here is a brief summary of the report ’ s findings on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the molecular and methodological level , originally compiled here : • can not discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments • has no positive or negative controls • does not seem to have been properly peer reviewed The authors conclude their report by asking the publisher of the original Corman-Drosten study on novel coronavirus detection using the PCR test , Eurosurveillance , to retract the paper .
If PCR tests are useless as this new report finds , then how can they possibly be relied upon to accurately determine the true nature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on this from Mercola.com… According to media reports , COVID-19 “ cases , ” meaning positive PCR test results , are soaring across the U.S. and around the world , leading to the implementation of measures that in some cases are stricter than what we endured during the initial wave .
However , as detailed in several recent articles , including “ Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste , ” PCR tests are being used incorrectly , resulting in the false appearance of widespread transmission .
In reality , the vast majority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positive test will not develop symptoms and aren ’ t infectious .
Needless to say , if you ’ re not infectious , you pose no health risk to anyone , and being placed under what amounts to house arrest is nothing but cruel and unusual punishment for no reason whatsoever .
Positive Test Rates Have No Bearing on Mortality Rates In The Highwire report above , Del Bigtree breaks down how excessively high test sensitivity leads to falsely elevated “ case ” numbers that in reality tell us nothing about the situation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , what ’ s missing from the COVID-19 conversation is the actual death rate .
“ If COVID is a deadly virus , what should we see when cases increase ?
” he asks .
The answer , of course , is an increase in deaths .
However , that ’ s not what ’ s happening .
Aside from a small bump at the beginning , when doctors were unsure of the appropriate treatment and some states recklessly and irresponsibly sent infected patients into ill equipped nursing homes , the death rate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rates have dramatically risen and fallen in intervals .
In the video , Bigtree features a November 4 , 2020 , tweet1 by White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas showing the number of positive tests ( aka “ cases ” ) in blue and COVID-19 related deaths in red , since the start of the pandemic up until the end of October 2020 .
As you can see , there ’ s no correlation between the positive test rate and subsequent deaths .
One of the explanations for why positive test rates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hand is the simple fact that a vast majority of those testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic .
They simply aren ’ t sick .
The PCR test is merely picking up inactive ( noninfectious ) viral particles .
In one study,2 which looked at pregnant women admitted for delivery , 87.9 % of the women who tested positive for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 had no symptoms .
Another study3 looked at a large homeless shelter in Boston .
After a cluster of COVID-19 cases was observed there , researchers conducted symptoms assessments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the shelter over a two-day period .
Of 408 people tested , 147 , or 36 % , were positive , yet symptoms were conspicuously absent .
Cough occurred in only 7.5 % of cases , shortness of breath in 1.4 % and fever in 0.7 % .
All symptoms were “ uncommon among COVID-positive individuals , ” the researchers noted .
During a June 8 , 2020 , press briefing , Maria Van Kerkhove , the World Health Organization ’ s technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic , made it very clear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meaning an individual who tests positive but does not exhibit symptoms is highly unlikely to transmit live virus to others .
“ We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing .
They ’ re following asymptomatic cases , they ’ re following contacts , and they ’ re not finding secondary transmission … it ’ s very rare , and much of that is not published in the literature , ” Van Kerkhove said .
Just one day later , Dr. Mike Ryan , executive director @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , backpedaled Van Kerkhove ’ s statement , saying the remarks were “ misinterpreted.
” 4 Needless to say , when you ’ re trying to justify the implementation of a vast surveillance network , it ’ s no good to admit a vast majority of people are having their privacy infringed upon for no good reason whatsoever .
Asymptomatic People Pose No Risk to Others Most recently , a study5 in Nature Communications assessed the risk posed by asymptomatic people by looking at the data from a mass screening program in Wuhan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under strict lockdown between January 23 and April 8 , 2020 .
Between May 14 and June 1 , 2020 , 9,899,828 residents of Wuhan city over the age of 6 underwent PCR testing .
In all , 92.9 % of the entire city population participated in the testing .
Of these , 9,865,404 had no previous diagnosis of COVID-19 and 34,424 were recovered COVID-19 patients .
Not a single one of the 1,174 people who had been in close contact with an asymptomatic individual tested positive .
In all , there were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cases detected .
( The overall detection rate was 0.3 per 10,000 . )
Importantly , not a single one of the 1,174 people who had been in close contact with an asymptomatic individual tested positive .
Additionally , of the 34,424 participants with a history of COVID-19 , 107 individuals ( 0.310 % ) tested positive again , but none were symptomatic .
As noted by the authors:6 “ Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and repositive cases , indicating no ‘ viable virus ’ in positive cases detected in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ persons aged from 10 to 89 years … The asymptomatic positive rate was the lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below ( 0.124/10,000 ) , and the highest among the elderly aged 60 years and above ( 0.442/10,000 ) .
The asymptomatic positive rate in females ( 0.355/10,000 ) was higher than that in males ( 0.256/10,000 ) .
” Interestingly , when they further tested asymptomatic patients for antibodies , they discovered that 190 of the 300 , or 63.3 % , had actually had a “ hot ” or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ antibodies .
Still , none of their contacts had been infected .
In other words , even though asymptomatics were ( or had been ) carriers of apparently live virus , they still did not transmit it to others .
As noted by the authors , “ there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts.
” They further added:7 “ Compared with symptomatic patients , asymptomatic infected persons generally have low quantity of viral loads and a short duration of viral shedding , which decrease the transmission @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study , virus culture was carried out on samples from asymptomatic positive cases , and found no viable SARS-CoV-2 virus .
All close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases tested negative , indicating that the asymptomatic positive cases detected in this study were unlikely to be infectious.
” Reinfected Individuals Are Not Infectious Either The same held true for people who tested positive a second time after having recovered from an active infection .
“ Results of virus culturing and contract [ sic ] tracing found no evidence that repositive cases in recovered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consistent with evidence from other sources , ” the authors said.8 The researchers also pointed out that virus cultures and genetic studies have shown the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 appears to be weakening over time , and that newly infected individuals are more likely to be asymptomatic and have a lower viral load than the cases seen earlier in the outbreak .
What does all of this tell us ?
It tells us there ’ s no reason to panic simply because the number of positive tests are on the rise .
Remember , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PCR test that is set to an excessive cycle threshold , the more false positives you ’ ll get .
As explained in “ Asymptomatic ‘ Casedemic ’ Is a Perpetuation of Needless Fear , ” by using an excessive cycle threshold that amplifies the viral RNA to the point that it detects inactive ( noninfectious ) particles is at the heart of this so-called pandemic .
It ’ s what keeps the pandemic narrative going , when in fact it ’ s long since over .
Interestingly , the same day the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance9,10 on mask wearing , claiming asymptomatic people account for more than half of all transmissions .
Where did they get that from ?
The two references listed as support for that claim include a study11 from July 2020 , and CDC data that haven ’ t even been published yet.12 It just says it was “ submitted ” for publication sometime in 2020 , therefore , we are unable to provide any source link .
The CDC makes no mention of the China study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
CNN , which reported the CDC ’ s update , parroting the idea that asymptomatic spread is why it ’ s so important to wear a mask , also made no mention of the landmark study from China .
Curious , don ’ t you think ?
It ’ s almost as though the CDC doesn ’ t want us to know we have nothing to fear from healthy people .
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT OUR WINTER FUNDRAISING DRIVE HERE

By
Now more than ever, it’s time to do the one thing that COVID-aligned media have been asking for almost a year now – follow the science. Well, here it is for all the world to see.
Not only is the following scientific evidence damning for the ‘New Normal’ lockdown culture that’s been perpetuated, the primary method for reporting ‘cases’ that public health officials and politicians have been using to wield their newfound power – the PCR test – has just been summarily rendered “useless” by a global team of experts in this new report.
The “Corman-Drosten Review Report“ was authored by the International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS), and is an external peer review report that reveals ’10 fatal flaws’ in the PCR test – the main test used for COVID:
In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.
The authors reference the term “useless” eight different times in their report and concluded that a major consequence of the flawed PCR testing protocol is false positives.
SEE ALSO: “Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.”
Here is a brief summary of the report’s findings on the PCR test’s scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level, originally compiled here:
is non-specific, due to erroneous primer design
is enormously variable
cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments
has no positive or negative controls
has no standard operating procedure
does not seem to have been properly peer reviewed
The authors conclude their report by asking the publisher of the original Corman-Drosten study on novel coronavirus detection using the PCR test, Eurosurveillance, to retract the paper.
If PCR tests are useless as this new report finds, then how can they possibly be relied upon to accurately determine the true nature of the ‘pandemic’?
More on this from Mercola.com…
According to media reports, COVID-19 “cases,” meaning positive PCR test results, are soaring across the U.S. and around the world, leading to the implementation of measures that in some cases are stricter than what we endured during the initial wave.
However, as detailed in several recent articles, including “Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste,” PCR tests are being used incorrectly, resulting in the false appearance of widespread transmission.
In reality, the vast majority of people who end up with a positive test will not develop symptoms and aren’t infectious. Needless to say, if you’re not infectious, you pose no health risk to anyone, and being placed under what amounts to house arrest is nothing but cruel and unusual punishment for no reason whatsoever.
Positive Test Rates Have No Bearing on Mortality Rates
In The Highwire report above, Del Bigtree breaks down how excessively high test sensitivity leads to falsely elevated “case” numbers that in reality tell us nothing about the situation at hand. As noted by Bigtree, what’s missing from the COVID-19 conversation is the actual death rate.
“If COVID is a deadly virus, what should we see when cases increase?” he asks. The answer, of course, is an increase in deaths. However, that’s not what’s happening.
Aside from a small bump at the beginning, when doctors were unsure of the appropriate treatment and some states recklessly and irresponsibly sent infected patients into ill equipped nursing homes, the death rate has remained relatively flat while positive test rates have dramatically risen and fallen in intervals.
In the video, Bigtree features a November 4, 2020, tweet1 by White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas showing the number of positive tests (aka “cases”) in blue and COVID-19 related deaths in red, since the start of the pandemic up until the end of October 2020. As you can see, there’s no correlation between the positive test rate and subsequent deaths.
Vast Majority of ‘COVID-19 Patients’ Are Asymptomatic
One of the explanations for why positive test rates and mortality do not go hand in hand is the simple fact that a vast majority of those testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic. They simply aren’t sick. The PCR test is merely picking up inactive (noninfectious) viral particles.
In one study,2 which looked at pregnant women admitted for delivery, 87.9% of the women who tested positive for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 had no symptoms. Another study3 looked at a large homeless shelter in Boston. After a cluster of COVID-19 cases was observed there, researchers conducted symptoms assessments and testing among all guests residing at the shelter over a two-day period.
Of 408 people tested, 147, or 36%, were positive, yet symptoms were conspicuously absent. Cough occurred in only 7.5% of cases, shortness of breath in 1.4% and fever in 0.7%. All symptoms were “uncommon among COVID-positive individuals,” the researchers noted.
Asymptomatic Transmission Is Very Rare During a June 8, 2020, press briefing, Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization’s technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that asymptomatic transmission is very rare, meaning an individual who tests positive but does not exhibit symptoms is highly unlikely to transmit live virus to others. “We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They’re following asymptomatic cases, they’re following contacts, and they’re not finding secondary transmission … it’s very rare, and much of that is not published in the literature,” Van Kerkhove said. Just one day later, Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO’s emergencies program, backpedaled Van Kerkhove’s statement, saying the remarks were “misinterpreted.”4 Needless to say, when you’re trying to justify the implementation of a vast surveillance network, it’s no good to admit a vast majority of people are having their privacy infringed upon for no good reason whatsoever. Asymptomatic People Pose No Risk to Others Most recently, a study5 in Nature Communications assessed the risk posed by asymptomatic people by looking at the data from a mass screening program in Wuhan, China. The city had been under strict lockdown between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Between May 14 and June 1, 2020, 9,899,828 residents of Wuhan city over the age of 6 underwent PCR testing. In all, 92.9% of the entire city population participated in the testing. Of these, 9,865,404 had no previous diagnosis of COVID-19 and 34,424 were recovered COVID-19 patients. Not a single one of the 1,174 people who had been in close contact with an asymptomatic individual tested positive. In all, there were zero symptomatic cases and only 300 asymptomatic cases detected. (The overall detection rate was 0.3 per 10,000.) Importantly, not a single one of the 1,174 people who had been in close contact with an asymptomatic individual tested positive. Additionally, of the 34,424 participants with a history of COVID-19, 107 individuals (0.310%) tested positive again, but none were symptomatic. As noted by the authors:6 “Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and repositive cases, indicating no ‘viable virus’ in positive cases detected in this study … The 300 asymptomatic positive persons aged from 10 to 89 years … The asymptomatic positive rate was the lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below (0.124/10,000), and the highest among the elderly aged 60 years and above (0.442/10,000). The asymptomatic positive rate in females (0.355/10,000) was higher than that in males (0.256/10,000).” Asymptomatic People Have Low Viral Load Interestingly, when they further tested asymptomatic patients for antibodies, they discovered that 190 of the 300, or 63.3%, had actually had a “hot” or productive infection resulting in the production of antibodies. Still, none of their contacts had been infected. In other words, even though asymptomatics were (or had been) carriers of apparently live virus, they still did not transmit it to others. As noted by the authors, “there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts.” They further added:7 “Compared with symptomatic patients, asymptomatic infected persons generally have low quantity of viral loads and a short duration of viral shedding, which decrease the transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2. In the present study, virus culture was carried out on samples from asymptomatic positive cases, and found no viable SARS-CoV-2 virus. All close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases tested negative, indicating that the asymptomatic positive cases detected in this study were unlikely to be infectious.” Reinfected Individuals Are Not Infectious Either The same held true for people who tested positive a second time after having recovered from an active infection. “Results of virus culturing and contract [sic] tracing found no evidence that repositive cases in recovered COVID-19 patients were infectious, which is consistent with evidence from other sources,” the authors said.8 The researchers also pointed out that virus cultures and genetic studies have shown the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 appears to be weakening over time, and that newly infected individuals are more likely to be asymptomatic and have a lower viral load than the cases seen earlier in the outbreak. What does all of this tell us? It tells us there’s no reason to panic simply because the number of positive tests are on the rise. Remember, the more people you test using a PCR test that is set to an excessive cycle threshold, the more false positives you’ll get. As explained in “Asymptomatic ‘Casedemic’ Is a Perpetuation of Needless Fear,” by using an excessive cycle threshold that amplifies the viral RNA to the point that it detects inactive (noninfectious) particles is at the heart of this so-called pandemic. It’s what keeps the pandemic narrative going, when in fact it’s long since over.
CDC Uses Questionable Sources to Counter China Study
Interestingly, the same day the China study came out, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance9,10 on mask wearing, claiming asymptomatic people account for more than half of all transmissions. Where did they get that from?
The two references listed as support for that claim include a study11 from July 2020, and CDC data that haven’t even been published yet.12 It just says it was “submitted” for publication sometime in 2020, therefore, we are unable to provide any source link. The CDC makes no mention of the China study, which included nearly 10 million individuals.
CNN, which reported the CDC’s update, parroting the idea that asymptomatic spread is why it’s so important to wear a mask, also made no mention of the landmark study from China. Curious, don’t you think? It’s almost as though the CDC doesn’t want us to know we have nothing to fear from healthy people.
Read more at Mercola.com…
READ MORE COVID NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire COVID Files
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT OUR WINTER FUNDRAISING DRIVE HERE


21stcenturywire--2020-12-09--Urgent Safety Warning: Health Experts Petition to Stop All COVID-19 Human Vaccine Trials

On December 1 , 2020 , the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA , the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval , for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies , in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b ( EudraCT number 2020-002641-42 ) .
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design .
On the one hand , the petitioners demand that , due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study , a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used .
This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19 .
On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality , neither the risk of disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ determined with the necessary certainty , which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se .
Furthermore , they demand that it must be excluded , e.g .
by means of animal experiments , that risks already known from previous studies , which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses , can be realized .
The concerns are directed in particular to the following points : • The formation of so-called “ non-neutralizing antibodies ” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction , especially when the test person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wild ” virus after vaccination .
This so-called antibody-dependent amplification , ADE , has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats , for example .
In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus .
• The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 .
However , spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins , which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans .
It must be absolutely ruled out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an immune reaction against syncytin-1 , as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women .
• The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol ( PEG ) .
70 % of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic , potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination .
• The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects .
As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination , millions of healthy people would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow .
Nevertheless , BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1 , 2020 .
CALL FOR HELP : Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA .
Betreff : Co-signing the petition of Dr. Wodarg , Germany , and Dr. Yeadon , UK ( submitted on 1-Dec-2020 ) Dear Sir or Madam @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon to support their urgent request to stay the Phase III clinical trial ( s ) of BNT162b ( EudraCT Number 2020-002641-42 ) and other clinical trials .
The full text of the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon can be found here : https : //2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf I hereby respectfully request that EMA act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon immediately .
Regards .
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV

By
As governments and corporate media around the world shift into public relations overdrive promoting the new COVID-19 vaccine – in the hopes of fast-tracking the controversial product’s approval, it seems that neither politicians nor journalists are very interested in addressing the mounting concerns over the rushed nature of its adoption, as well as scientifically-grounded concerns over the experimental product’s lack of long-term safety data.
Normally, a vaccine product would take between four to ten years to develop and properly test in order to ensure its long-term viability and safety before being deployed into the general population. However, due to emotive claims being made by western governments, public health officials and media outlets saying, ‘we cannot wait that long for a vaccine,’ massive political pressure has been put to bear on government regulators to allow pharmaceutical firms to bypass, or ‘fast-track’ normal testing and trial protocols in order to release their brand new mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine as early as December 2020. This means that after effectively skipping over normal long-term clinical animal safety trials followed by long-range clinical human trials, firms like Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna are being allowed to release their as yet unproven experimental mRNA technology into the population – after only spending a few months in development and human testing.
As US infectious disease expert Dr Tim Lahey remarked back in April, “In the desperation to save lives in the coronavirus pandemic, we have already begun to relax scientific standards in the hope of finding a treatment without waiting to prove that it works.”
There have been multiple reports of serious side effects, and even deaths, suffered by human subjects taking part in their fast-tracked studies. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) admitted this week that that six trial participants had died, four of who were in the control group, after receiving the Pfizer mRNA vaccine. Despite this and other reports, the FDA still claim that there are ‘no specific safety concerns’ that would prevent the mRNA vaccine being approved.
Leading the way in pushing for an unusual rapid roll-out of the experimental vaccine are the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia.
“There’s a long list of things we don’t know,” said Maria Sundaram, from the Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases at the University of Toronto.
Health Canada is currently reviewing early findings from Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech and, more recently, the University of Oxford/AstraZeneca, but none of the three firms have shared their full data yet, and instead have simply issued a series of press releases making confident claims of “safety” and “effectiveness.” Some leading health officials are beginning to speak publicly on the matter, but the topic is being treated as a fait accompli by the media and political leaders.
While politicians, government regulators and the media seem to be accepting the word of Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna, believing that their new nRNA vaccines have indeed ‘worked’ in clinical trials, the reality is there is still still no way of actually knowing if any of the corporations’ broad claims about effectiveness or safety will actually hold up in real-world scenarios. The attitude seems to be one of, “We’ll know more about the effects later on, after we vaccinate the population.” In this sense, politicians and media are effectively allowing the pharmaceutical firms to use the general population as one giant clinical study – something which is unprecedented in history on such a mammoth scale.
As yet, few appear to be brave enough to challenge this obvious problem, probably for fear of being attacked in the media, or being accused of ‘holding up the approval of this much needed solution to the pandemic.’
Unfortunately, these general safety concerns are only the beginning in a long list of specific concerns and dangers which have since raised by leading life science and medical professionals.
The following press release and call to action was published last week by Germany’s 2020 News…
On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42). Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design. On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se. Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points: The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
.
The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
.
The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
.
The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020. LINK: Dr Wolfgang Wodarg and Dr Michael Yeadon’s letter outlining serious vaccine safety concerns CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA. Nachtrag: Wegen teilweiser Überlastung der Server hier der Inhalt der E-Mail und die Kontaktadressen zum späteren Selbst-Versenden: An: [email protected]; [email protected] Betreff: Co-signing the petition of Dr. Wodarg, Germany, and Dr. Yeadon, UK (submitted on 1-Dec-2020) Dear Sir or Madam, I am hereby co-signing the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon to support their urgent request to stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b (EudraCT Number 2020-002641-42) and other clinical trials. The full text of the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon can be found here: https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf I hereby respectfully request that EMA act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon immediately. Regards. READ MORE VACCINE NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire VACCINE Files SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-12-09--Discussion: Is America About to Lose it All?

As political and ideological culture wars continue to pull the country to new depths of divisiveness , the overall picture does not appear to be heading in a positive direction for America .
With totalitarian policies like ‘ lockdowns ’ and economic shutdowns , and radical ideological agendas like cultural Marxism currently in the ascendancy in mainstream circles , the United States will continue to fracture along partisan lines , and may soon become the divided states of America .
Many scholars now believe that this new radical partisanship is also signalling the death of ethics and morals , punctuated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Christianity , and even against America ’ s once sacrosanct Constitutional Rights .
Is the Left taking their long march too far ?
In their pursuit of cultural and political dominance , will they eventually undermine the very fabric of society , its freedoms , and the rule of law itself ?
Can America strike any kind of balance between long-standing conservative principles and free markets – against the statist and socialist impulses of the political left ?
The current trends have also been exacerbated by COVID lockdowns , which has seen new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ governors like Andrew Andrew Cuomo in New York , Gavin Newsom in California , and the radical Los Angeles Mayor , Eric Garcetti – all of whom have used the air a ‘ pandemic ’ to consolidate political and state power .
By shutting down schools and businesses , the new authoritarian class has managed to gain unprecedented control over peoples ’ lives and work .
These same radical politicians are now making overtures about coercing ( and in some cases , forcing ) their citizens to take an experimental COVID-19 vaccines – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has a similar infectious fatality rate ( IRF ) as the seasonal flu , and with an approximate 99.75 % recovery rate .
Meanwhile , the corporate media are attacking any dissenters who are questioning governments ’ radical measures .
That said , can America survive intact as a bona fide constitutional republic through the current political and social upheaval ?
Which sort of qualities would a prospective leader need in order hold the country together through this tumultuous epoch ?
Host Patrick Bet-David has a virtual sit down with Larry Arnn , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Hillsdale College , where he is a Professor of History and Politics .
Watch : SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV

By
As political and ideological culture wars continue to pull the country to new depths of divisiveness,the overall picture does not appear to be heading in a positive direction for America. With totalitarian policies like ‘lockdowns’ and economic shutdowns, and radical ideological agendas like cultural Marxism currently in the ascendancy in mainstream circles, the United States will continue to fracture along partisan lines, and may soon become the divided states of America.
Many scholars now believe that this new radical partisanship is also signalling the death of ethics and morals, punctuated by an the attack on religions like Christianity, and even against America’s once sacrosanct Constitutional Rights. Is the Left taking their long march too far? In their pursuit of cultural and political dominance, will they eventually undermine the very fabric of society, its freedoms, and the rule of law itself? Can America strike any kind of balance between long-standing conservative principles and free markets – against the statist and socialist impulses of the political left?
The current trends have also been exacerbated by COVID lockdowns, which has seen new dictatorial powers given to openly authoritarian state governors like Andrew Andrew Cuomo in New York, Gavin Newsom in California, and the radical Los Angeles Mayor, Eric Garcetti – all of whom have used the air a ‘pandemic’ to consolidate political and state power. By shutting down schools and businesses, the new authoritarian class has managed to gain unprecedented control over peoples’ lives and work. These same radical politicians are now making overtures about coercing (and in some cases, forcing) their citizens to take an experimental COVID-19 vaccines – all for a seasonal respiratory virus which has a similar infectious fatality rate (IRF) as the seasonal flu, and with an approximate 99.75% recovery rate. Meanwhile, the corporate media are attacking any dissenters who are questioning governments’ radical measures.
That said, can America survive intact as a bona fide constitutional republic through the current political and social upheaval? Which sort of qualities would a prospective leader need in order hold the country together through this tumultuous epoch?
Host Patrick Bet-David has a virtual sit down with Larry Arnn, an American Educator, writer and President of Hillsdale College, where he is a Professor of History and Politics. Watch:
Visit 2020 Election Edge LIVE Blog Here
READ MORE 2020 ELECTION NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire 2020 Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-12-09--Will Their New Normal Become ‘Never Normal Again?’

One of the most disturbing aspects of the ongoing COVID craze , is that the legions of supposed ‘ experts @ @ @ @ @ are now doubling-down on their failed strategies from the last nine months .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ and their vaunted science advisors are intent on re-running the same script and playbook again @ @ @ @ @ miracle , their faith-based predictions of doom will finally materialize – giving them additional license @ @ @ @ @ rules , laws and social engineering agendas like the ‘ New Normal ’ technocracy diktats @ @ @ @ @ governments by the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) .
Host Laura Ingraham explains why @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus ‘ pandemic ’ and panic-driven lockdown policies , the obsession with masks , and @ @ @ @ @ are all nothing more than convenient authoritarian devices designed to breakdown society , constitutional law @ @ @ @ @ READ MORE NEW NORMAL NEWS AT : 21st Century Wire New Normal Files SUPPORT OUR @ @ @ @ @ A MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV

By
One of the most disturbing aspects of the ongoing COVID craze, is that the legions of supposed ‘experts’ in government and media are now doubling-down on their failed strategies from the last nine months. It’s as if government technocrats and their vaunted science advisors are intent on re-running the same script and playbook again, hoping that by some miracle, their faith-based predictions of doom will finally materialize – giving them additional license to implement even more draconian rules, laws and social engineering agendas like the ‘New Normal’ technocracy diktats currently being pushed through individual governments by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
Host Laura Ingraham explains why the current hysteria over the coronavirus ‘pandemic’ and panic-driven lockdown policies, the obsession with masks, and the attack on Christmas – are all nothing more than convenient authoritarian devices designed to breakdown society, constitutional law and democracy. Watch:
READ MORE NEW NORMAL NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire New Normal Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-12-11--UKC News: Brexit Leads to TPP, Vaccine Confusion, Hancock’s Lockdown Folly

As the next deadline looms , Brexit is back in the headlines , with Britain uncertain where they are with @ @ @ @ @ heading directly for globalist regimes like TPP and TTIP .
Matt Hancock ’ s lockdown @ @ @ @ @ bad acting for the cameras , and vaccine confusion in Australia leaves a clue to @ @ @ @ @ Bill Gates and the pharmaceutical industry ’ s breakneck gambit for a globally adopted COVID @ @ @ @ @ Biden takes to the podium to unveil his bold new “ masking plan ” by @ @ @ @ @ mask compliance ” from the US population after he becomes president .
All this and @ @ @ @ @ and Patrick Henningsen with the end of week news round-up .
Watch : SUPPORT OUR @ @ @ @ @ A MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV

By
As the next deadline looms, Brexit is back in the headlines, with Britain uncertain where they are with the EU but most certainly heading directly for globalist regimes like TPP and TTIP. Matt Hancock’s lockdown folly continues along with some bad acting for the cameras, and vaccine confusion in Australia leaves a clue to what might be behind the Bill Gates and the pharmaceutical industry’s breakneck gambit for a globally adopted COVID vaccination. Also, Joe Biden takes to the podium to unveil his bold new “masking plan” by demanding 100 days of “mask compliance” from the US population after he becomes president. All this and more.
Co-hosts Mike Robinson and Patrick Henningsen with the end of week news round-up. Watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GOVSjwtAT0
READ MORE COVID NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire COVID Files
SUPPORT OUR WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV


21stcenturywire--2020-12-11--Florida Becomes First US State to Mandate Reporting of CT Values for PCR Tests

The State of Florida ’ s Department of Health has now mandated PCR test “ Cycle threshold ( CT ) values and their reference ranges , as applicable , must be reported by laboratories to FDOH via electronic laboratory reporting or by fax immediately ” – a new requirement that was sent out in a memo via email to COVID-19 testing labs across the state in the last week .
The mandate , sent on letterhead from both Florida Surgeon General , Scott A. Rivkees , MD , and Governor Ron DeSantis , is historic since it marks the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has acknowledged the critical importance of counting cycle thresholds when reporting PCR test results that drive COVID-19 ‘ case ’ numbers : A cycle threshold , or “ CT value ” is defined here by the Center for Disease Control ( CDC ) in a FAQ : It ’ s long been known and well-documented that the higher number of cycles used in the PCR test , the lower the amount of “ viral load ” likely to be found in the testing sample – and often non-existent , resulting in a false-positive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flaws , can render the PCR test basically “ useless ” in testing for COVID-19 .
Without being able to know the CT values on PCR tests , where they can be widely variable in their reference ranges , using only a “ positive ” test result to determine if a person is infectious or even a ‘ case ’ is highly problematic .
Even The New York Times , back in August of 2020 , published a report that essentially knee-capped the credibility of the PCR test with the headline “ Your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Shouldn ’ t Be.
” A short video review of the NYT report ’ s findings is available here .
Also , 21WIRE editor and co-host Patrick Henningsen explained on an episode of UKC News how PCR tests have been used to create a ‘ Case-demic ’ : Would We Still Be Under Lockdown ?
When news of this mandate first broke in Florida , the obvious question became if CT values had been required to be reported from the very beginning of the COVID crisis , would people , businesses and entire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a lockdown ?
Clearly , the resulting data reported out as ‘ cases ’ using these high CT values have created an unmitigated disaster for both public policy & media discourse about the actual community spread of the virus .
And that has resulted in the perpetual ‘ New Normal ’ lockdown culture we find ourselves in today .
Back in July of 2020 , on an episode of the “ This Week in Virology ” podcast , Dr. Anthony Fauci , who ’ s become to many as something of a Patron @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an interview that when the PCR test is run at 35 cycles or higher , a positive result at that level ( the metric that ’ s being used to indicate an infection ) simply can not be considered “ replication-confident ” : Watch at 4m , 20s mark , directly from Saint Fauci himself : Has Florida smartened up to the game now ?
It ’ s right to be skeptical of this latest move by Florida , but it ’ s also encouraging to see .
This could all just be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so that a Biden-Harris administration can declare a surreptitious victory over COVID in the Spring of 2021 – with a sudden and dramatic drop in the number of new cases .
Or , hopefully , it will get other states to follow Florida ’ s lead and push for more accurate reporting so we can finally put an end to this so-called pandemic .
NOTE : Please forward this news and information to your state or local government and ask whether they too will follow Florida ’ s lead on maintaining an accurate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HELP SUPPORT OUR WINTER FUNDRAISING DRIVE HERE

By
The State of Florida’s Department of Health has now mandated PCR test “Cycle threshold (CT) values and their reference ranges, as applicable, must be reported by laboratories to FDOH via electronic laboratory reporting or by fax immediately” – a new requirement that was sent out in a memo via email to COVID-19 testing labs across the state in the last week.
The mandate, sent on letterhead from both Florida Surgeon General, Scott A. Rivkees, MD, and Governor Ron DeSantis, is historic since it marks the first time a U.S. state public health department has acknowledged the critical importance of counting cycle thresholds when reporting PCR test results that drive COVID-19 ‘case’ numbers:
A cycle threshold, or “CT value” is defined here by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in a FAQ:
The cycle threshold (Ct value) is the point at which a reaction reaches a fluorescent intensity above background levels. The Ct value indicates when the nucleic acid target is detectable in the amplification process. There is a correlation between the Ct value and the amount of viral genetic material that was present in the specimen.
The Problem with PCR Tests
It’s long been known and well-documented that the higher number of cycles used in the PCR test, the lower the amount of “viral load” likely to be found in the testing sample – and often non-existent, resulting in a false-positive. This fact, along with other flaws, can render the PCR test basically “useless” in testing for COVID-19.
Without being able to know the CT values on PCR tests, where they can be widely variable in their reference ranges, using only a “positive” test result to determine if a person is infectious or even a ‘case’ is highly problematic.
The New York Times, back in August of 2020, published a report that essentially knee-capped the credibility of the PCR test with the headline “Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.”
A short video review of the NYT report’s findings is available here.
Also, 21WIRE editor and co-host Patrick Henningsen explained on an episode of UKC News how PCR tests have been used to create a ‘Case-demic’:
Would We Still Be Under Lockdown?
When news of this mandate first broke in Florida, the obvious question became if CT values had been required to be reported from the very beginning of the COVID crisis, would people, businesses and entire states still be under any form of a lockdown?
This is huge. Imagine if they had been doing this, using PCR Tests properly, since March. Would anyone be under #lockdown? Of course not… https://t.co/qXbBEpBUYb — Patrick Henningsen (@21WIRE) December 10, 2020
Clearly, the resulting data reported out as ‘cases’ using these high CT values have created an unmitigated disaster for both public policy and media discourse about the actual community spread of the virus. And that has resulted in the perpetual ‘New Normal’ lockdown culture we find ourselves in today.
“Saint Fauci’s” Summer Tell
Back in July of 2020, on an episode of the “This Week in Virology” podcast, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who’s become to many as something of a Patron Saint of COVID Truth, revealed in an interview that when the PCR test is run at 35 cycles or higher, a positive result at that level (the metric that’s being used to indicate an infection) simply cannot be considered “replication-confident”:
“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more… the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule… you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”
Watch at 4m, 20s mark, directly from Saint Fauci himself:
Has Florida smartened up to the game now?
It’s right to be skeptical of this latest move by Florida, but it’s also encouraging to see.
This could all just be a ploy to eventually cut CT values so that a Biden-Harris administration can declare a surreptitious victory over COVID in the Spring of 2021 – with a sudden and dramatic drop in the number of new cases.
Or, hopefully, it will get other states to follow Florida’s lead and push for more accurate reporting so we can finally put an end to this so-called pandemic.
NOTE: Please forward this news and information to your state or local government and ask whether they too will follow Florida’s lead on maintaining an accurate PCR Testing standard going forward.
READ MORE COVID NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire COVID Files
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT OUR WINTER FUNDRAISING DRIVE HERE