westernjournal--2020-03-31--Trump’s FDA Okays Malaria Drugs To Treat COVID-19 as Media Tries To Limit Their Use

When COVID-19 first began to spread , governments across the world didn ’ t have much of a clue as to what the best treatment would be .
Fox News host Tucker Carlson , along with his colleague Laura Ingraham , were some of the first media personalities in the U.S. to bring on guests claiming that the anti-malarial drugs hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were helping people infected with the virus .
President Donald Trump , an avid Fox viewer , must have been watching .
During a news conference at the White House last week , Trump touted the drug @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anthony Fauci , the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , saying there was only “ anecdotal ” evidence to suggest that they are .
TRENDING : While Dems Lie About Trump 's CDC Budget , Turns Out Obama Requested Millions in Cuts After the president endorsed the drugs , the anti-Trump corporate media instantly leapt into action to discredit him .
CNN ran an “ analysis ” piece with the headline “ Trump peddles unsubstantiated hope in dark times.
” NBC reporter Peter Alexander asked Trump whether he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people infected with COVID-19 by expressing his support for hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin .
The New Yorker ran two articles accusing the president of pushing bogus science .
One article was titled , “ Trump ’ s Dangerous Messaging About a Possible Coronavirus Treatment.
” The other , “ The Meaning of Donald Trump ’ s Coronavirus Quackery.
” Meanwhile , Twitter took down a Rudy Giuliani tweet that said hydroxychloroquine was a possible way to treat the virus .
On Sunday , the Department of Health and Human Services announced it has accepted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one million doses of chloroquine phosphate from a pair of pharmaceutical companies in order to treat patients hospitalized by COVID-19 .
The HHS statement explained that the Food and Drug Administration had issued an “ emergency use authorization ” so the drugs can be distributed and prescribed by doctors to hospitalized teen and adult patients with coronavirus when a clinical trial is not available or feasible .
RELATED : Private Sector Comes to the Rescue as J & J Plans To Distribute 1B Doses of COVID-19 Vaccine This is a game changer in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is mounting first-hand proof the drug is indeed an effective way to cure those who are suffering from the virus .
One such case is a Michigan man who said hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin cured him from his symptoms .
Laura Cox , the chairwomen of the Michigan Republican Party , shared his story on Twitter .
Democratic Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer has already requested access to the HHS stockpile so other COVID-19 patients in her state can be prescribed them .
Margaret Novins , a woman in her 50s from New Jersey , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ story was covered in Forbes .
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko of New York allegedly has a 100 percent cure rate with the drugs .
But the Trump Derangement Syndrome-infected media continues to push back .
The Guardian published an article with the headline “ Trump touted hydroxychloroquine as a cure for Covid-19 .
Don ’ t believe the hype.
” CNN again emphasized that there is “ little scientific evidence ” behind the claim that these drugs are effective in treating coronavirus .
It seems as though the corporate media would rather people die @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for pushing hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a possible cure to the COVID-19 virus .
Carlson said it best when in a monologue last week he explained that the real reason the media is taking such a negative approach to the possible cure is quite simple — the president supports it .
“ At the very least we should all be following developments in hydroxychloroquine ’ s use with interest and measured hope .
Why wouldn ’ t we be ?
” he asked .
“ Well , ” he continued , “ here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for it.
” “ Several days ago , the president expressed confidence in hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for the epidemic .
That was it for the media .
If Trump is for it , they ’ re against it , even if it might save American lives .
What reactive children they are .
And they immediately began a sustained push to discredit the drug long before the clinical results were in.
” It sure seems Tucker is going to have the last laugh on this one .
We are committed to truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Read our editorial standards .

When COVID-19 first began to spread, governments across the world didn’t have much of a clue as to what the best treatment would be.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson, along with his colleague Laura Ingraham, were some of the first media personalities in the U.S. to bring on guests claiming that the anti-malarial drugs hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were helping people infected with the virus.
President Donald Trump, an avid Fox viewer, must have been watching.
During a news conference at the White House last week, Trump touted the drug combination as a possible cure despite Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, saying there was only “anecdotal” evidence to suggest that they are.
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. The FDA has moved mountains – Thank You! Hopefully they will BOTH (H works better with A, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents)….. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 21, 2020
After the president endorsed the drugs, the anti-Trump corporate media instantly leapt into action to discredit him.
CNN ran an “analysis” piece with the headline “Trump peddles unsubstantiated hope in dark times.”
NBC reporter Peter Alexander asked Trump whether he was giving “false hope” to people infected with COVID-19 by expressing his support for hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.
Do you think the establishment media would rather attack Trump than help save lives? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 99% (3207 Votes) No: 1% (26 Votes)
The New Yorker ran two articles accusing the president of pushing bogus science.
One article was titled, “Trump’s Dangerous Messaging About a Possible Coronavirus Treatment.” The other, “The Meaning of Donald Trump’s Coronavirus Quackery.”
Meanwhile, Twitter took down a Rudy Giuliani tweet that said hydroxychloroquine was a possible way to treat the virus.
On Sunday, the Department of Health and Human Services announced it has accepted 30 million doses of hydroxychloroquine sulfate and one million doses of chloroquine phosphate from a pair of pharmaceutical companies in order to treat patients hospitalized by COVID-19.
The HHS statement explained that the Food and Drug Administration had issued an “emergency use authorization” so the drugs can be distributed and prescribed by doctors to hospitalized teen and adult patients with coronavirus when a clinical trial is not available or feasible.
Hydroxychloroquine, as President Trump suggested, is an important development in treating patients with the coronavirus.https://t.co/4cpWJw73Gh — newtgingrich (@newtgingrich) March 30, 2020
This is a game changer in the fight against COVID-19, as there is mounting first-hand evidence the drug is indeed an effective way to cure those who are suffering from the virus.
One such case is a Michigan man who said hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin cured him from his symptoms. Laura Cox, the chairwomen of the Michigan Republican Party, shared his story on Twitter.
Amazing news out of Michigan! Jim Santilli, of Macomb County, says Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin saved him. Thank you to @realDonaldTrump for cutting red tape at the FDA that allowed these drugs to help patients like Jim combat coronavirus! https://t.co/ngIXYP6vQH — Laura Cox (@MIGOPChair) March 31, 2020
Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has already requested access to the HHS stockpile so other COVID-19 patients in her state can be prescribed them.
The state of Michigan has requested hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine distributions from the Strategic National Stockpile for use on certain patients with #COVID19. https://t.co/O6CAcuChm0 — The Detroit News (@detroitnews) March 31, 2020
Margaret Novins, a woman in her 50s from New Jersey, also improved after taking hydroxychloroquine. Her story was covered in Forbes.
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko of New York allegedly has a 100 percent cure rate with the drugs.
#coronavirus News Alert: Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, a board-certified family practitioner in NY, has now treated 699 Covid-19 patients with 100% success using Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate, Zinc and Z-Pak. All symptoms of shortness of breath resolved within 4-6 hr https://t.co/siCvNg845Q pic.twitter.com/lOrUvBHp0A — Adam Milstein (@AdamMilstein) March 29, 2020
But the Trump Derangement Syndrome-infected media continues to push back.
The Guardian published an article with the headline “Trump touted hydroxychloroquine as a cure for Covid-19. Don’t believe the hype.”
Politico took a swipe at Ingraham.
Earlier this month, Fox News host Laura Ingraham tweeted praise for hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malaria drug championed by President Trump as a potential treatment for the virus, despite little evidence to that effecthttps://t.co/k4A7Mc9Hp7 — POLITICO (@politico) March 31, 2020
CNN again emphasized that there is “little scientific evidence” behind the claim that these drugs are effective in treating coronavirus.
Why does CNN not recognize the COVID patients all over the world who have walked out of hospitals testing negative after being treated with hydroxychloroquine? https://t.co/yiuGQ9TyB2 — Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) March 30, 2020
It seems as though the corporate media would rather people die than give Trump an ounce of credit for pushing hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a possible cure to the COVID-19 virus.
Carlson said it best when in a monologue last week he explained that the real reason the media is taking such a negative approach to the possible cure is quite simple — the president supports it.
“At the very least we should all be following developments in hydroxychloroquine’s use with interest and measured hope. Why wouldn’t we be?” he asked.
“Well,” he continued, “here’s why: Donald Trump is for it.”
“Several days ago, the president expressed confidence in hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for the epidemic. That was it for the media. If Trump is for it, they’re against it, even if it might save American lives. What reactive children they are. And they immediately began a sustained push to discredit the drug long before the clinical results were in.”
.@DrMarcSiegel gives a “shout-out” to Tucker Carlson for bringing attention to hydroxychloroquine as a potential coronavirus treatment: “I believe our focus on this drug has led directly to FDA emergency approval, which may save many lives.” pic.twitter.com/LBuZkgDe42 — Scott Morefield (@SKMorefield) March 31, 2020
It sure seems Tucker is going to have the last laugh on this one.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-31--Children’s TV Network Nickelodeon Celebrates ‘Transgender Day of Visibility’

Prominent children ’ s television network Nickelodeon has made waves across the web once again this week , voicing public support for yet another LGBT day of celebration .
Tuesday marked the annual International Transgender Day of Visibility , according to The U.K .
Independent , and Nickelodeon was quick to celebrate , posting to its Twitter account words of encouragement for transgender individuals attempting to “ live their truth.
” “ Today is International # TransDayOfVisibility , ” the network tweeted .
“ We ’ re celebrating transgender people around the world and the courage it takes to live @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , International Transgender Day of Visibility was established in an effort to “ recognize the accomplishments of transgender and gender non-conforming people as well as bring attention to their continued struggles , ” according to Forbes .
The unofficial holiday has since seen wider support from the now expanded , and far more vocal , LGBT community , having been promoted by advocacy organizations such as the Human Rights Campaign and the Pride Foundation .
TRENDING : While Dems Lie About Trump 's CDC Budget , Turns Out Obama Requested Millions in Cuts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children and adolescent content producer to publicly mainstream this sort of concept .
Both Marvel Comics and Marvel Studios have received widespread media attention in the last year for announcing the addition of major LGBT characters into their critically acclaimed superhero comic books and cinematic universe .
According to The Guardian , Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige said last December that a transgender hero would be coming to the studio ’ s film universe “ very soon ” in a feature that had already entered production at the time .
( Variety later @ @ @ @ @ @ @ addition of “ LGBT+ characters , and he did not mean to imply that a trans character will be coming to the MCU ‘ very soon . '
” In the world of comic books , Marvel announced on March 17 that its upcoming series “ The New Warriors ” would include the twin heroes Safespace and Snowflake , the latter of whom would be “ non-binary ” and go by “ they/them ” pronouns .
The announcement sparked controversy on social media , with conservative fans panning the concept as progressive pandering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ backhanded , as the U.K. ’ s Evening Standard reported .
Nickelodeon is also familiar with backlash regarding its open support of the LGBT community and the increasing inclusion of LGBT themes in its content , according to The Daily Wire .
The network had previously made postings in recent years for the June celebration of LGBT pride month .
Similar to the celebratory postings of other industry giants , Nickelodeon ’ s public support generally included pictures of the company logo adorned with the rainbow color scheme synonymous with the LGBT pride @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Songwriter of ' I Love Rock and Roll ' Alan Merrill The network first included LGBT characters to its cartoon series in 2016 , when “ The Loud House ” introduced recurring character Clyde McBride ’ s biracial gay parents .
Harold and Howard McBride ’ s introductory scene was even preceded by tongue-in-cheek fourth wall break from protagonist Lincoln Loud , who told audiences , “ This is it .
Time to make history.
” Children ’ s networks like Disney Channel , Cartoon Network and PBS Kids have also made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ characters in their cartoon productions in recent years .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Prominent children’s television network Nickelodeon has made waves across the web once again this week, voicing public support for yet another LGBT day of celebration.
Tuesday marked the annual International Transgender Day of Visibility, according to The U.K. Independent, and Nickelodeon was quick to celebrate, posting to its Twitter account words of encouragement for transgender individuals attempting to “live their truth.”
“Today is International #TransDayOfVisibility,” the network tweeted. “We’re celebrating transgender people around the world and the courage it takes to live their truth.”
First celebrated in 2009, International Transgender Day of Visibility was established in an effort to “recognize the accomplishments of transgender and gender non-conforming people as well as bring attention to their continued struggles,” according to Forbes.
The unofficial holiday has since seen wider support from the now expanded, and far more vocal, LGBT community, having been promoted by advocacy organizations such as the Human Rights Campaign and the Pride Foundation.
Today is International #TransDayOfVisibility ? We’re celebrating transgender people around the world and the courage it takes to live their truth #TDOV pic.twitter.com/u4gZsThwlB — Nickelodeon (@Nickelodeon) March 31, 2020
Nickelodeon is far from the first popular children and adolescent content producer to publicly mainstream this sort of concept.
Both Marvel Comics and Marvel Studios have received widespread media attention in the last year for announcing the addition of major LGBT characters into their critically acclaimed superhero comic books and cinematic universe.
According to The Guardian, Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige said last December that a transgender hero would be coming to the studio’s film universe “very soon” in a feature that had already entered production at the time. (Variety later reported that he was talking about the addition of “LGBT+ characters, and he did not mean to imply that a trans character will be coming to the MCU ‘very soon.'”
Does Hollywood's willingness to push LGBT content on children concern you? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 100% (115 Votes) No: 0% (0 Votes)
In the world of comic books, Marvel announced on March 17 that its upcoming series “The New Warriors” would include the twin heroes Safespace and Snowflake, the latter of whom would be “non-binary” and go by “they/them” pronouns.
The announcement sparked controversy on social media, with conservative fans panning the concept as progressive pandering and pro-LGBT audiences finding the idea offensively backhanded, as the U.K.’s Evening Standard reported.
Nickelodeon is also familiar with backlash regarding its open support of the LGBT community and the increasing inclusion of LGBT themes in its content, according to The Daily Wire. The network had previously made postings in recent years for the June celebration of LGBT pride month.
Similar to the celebratory postings of other industry giants, Nickelodeon’s public support generally included pictures of the company logo adorned with the rainbow color scheme synonymous with the LGBT pride movement.
The network first included LGBT characters to its cartoon series in 2016, when “The Loud House” introduced recurring character Clyde McBride’s biracial gay parents.
Nickelodeon makes history by Introducing first Gay couple in children’s cartoon ‘The Loud House’ What’s your Take? pic.twitter.com/B4jXlLvH4o — Xtian Dela™ (@xtiandela) July 25, 2016
Harold and Howard McBride’s introductory scene was even preceded by tongue-in-cheek fourth wall break from protagonist Lincoln Loud, who told audiences, “This is it. Time to make history.”
Children’s networks like Disney Channel, Cartoon Network and PBS Kids have also made the push to include gay and transgender characters in their cartoon productions in recent years.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-31--Dem Impeachment Push Distracted Gov’t from Coronavirus Response: McConnell

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday that the Democrat-led impeachment effort against President Donald Trump diverted congressional attention away from all other matters , including the unfolding coronavirus pandemic .
Radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt noted during an interview with McConnell that GOP Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas was the first to sound the alarm in mid-January regarding reports coming out of China about the novel coronavirus .
“ He was first , and I think Tom was right on the mark , ” McConnell responded , “ And it came up while we were tied down on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it diverted the attention of the government , because everything , every day , was all about impeachment .
But Tom figured this out early , and he was absolutely right.
” Politico reported on Monday that it was just hours before the beginning of Trump ’ s impeachment trial on Jan. 21 that Cotton — a U.S. Army combat veteran who now serves on Senate Intelligence Committee — began to worry .
That was the same day the first coronavirus case was detected in the United States , according to a CNN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ About Trump 's CDC Budget , Turns Out Obama Requested Millions in Cuts “ So [ Cotton ] started badgering the White House to bar travel from China immediately .
Cotton called the president , his son-in-law Jared Kushner , Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar and other top officials , warning about the dangers of the virus and pressing them to ground flights , ” Politico reported .
Trump made the then-controversial decision to ban flights coming out of China into the U.S. on Jan. 31 , making the U.S. one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That same week , the president established a coronavirus task force to monitor the unfolding public health situation .
Even as the news coming out of China worsened , House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer were pushing for additional witnesses and documents to be included in the impeachment trial , which would have resulted in the proceedings continuing for weeks or perhaps months .
On Jan. 31 , the GOP-led Senate voted against additional witnesses being introduced and ultimately acquitted Trump on Feb. 5 .
McConnell expressed pride @ @ @ @ @ @ @ partisan-charged days of impeachment to come together and unanimously pass a $ 2.2 trillion coronavirus aid package , despite a last-minute intervention by Pelosi that nearly scuttled a deal Senate Republicans and Democrats had reached .
The speaker had called for so-called “ Green New Deal ” initiatives , measures to benefit labor unions , and changes to voting laws to be included in the legislation , which McConnell and other Republicans hammered as having nothing to do with the coronavirus outbreak .
“ This was a genuine national emergency , ” McConnell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to put together a $ 2 trillion dollar bill in a week was really a herculean task , as you can imagine .
“ The way I thought it would work best would be for those of us in the Senate to try to get started on a bipartisan basis , and we were doing really quite well , as you may recall , until the speaker of the House decided to insert herself into the process , which created a couple of days of unnecessary partisan sniping .
But we got past @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump of not working urgently enough to address the coronavirus pandemic .
“ We should be taking every precaution .
What the president , his denial at the beginning , was deadly , ” Pelosi told host Jake Tapper on CNN ’ s “ State of the Union.
” The speaker also referenced the question made famous during the 1973 Watergate impeachment hearings against then-President Richard Nixon : “ What did the president know and when did he know it ?
” “ I don ’ t know what the scientists said to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about this , and what did he know ?
What did he know and when did he know it ?
That ’ s for an after-action review , ” Pelosi said .
“ But as the president fiddles , people are dying .
And we just have to take every precaution , ” she added .
Pelosi asked the same question on MSNBC ’ s “ Morning Joe ” on Tuesday , wondering what and when scientists were advising Trump about COVID-19 .
Republican Party national spokeswoman Elizabeth Harrington responded to Pelosi ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are so impeachment obsessed , Pelosi is trying to turn a virus from Wuhan into Watergate .
“ ‘ What did he know & when did he know it ?
’ Is she talking about Xi ?
POTUS mobilized CDC , created task force , and stopped travel , while Dems wasted our time on a Ukraine witch hunt.
” Following Pelosi ’ s Sunday CNN interview , Trump called her a “ sick puppy ” and a “ disgrace , ” in response to her claim his administration is costing people ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wasn ’ t as critical of Pelosi ’ s MSNBC interview , writing in a Twitter post : “ I watched a portion of low rated ( very ) Morning Psycho ( Joe ) this Morning in order to see what Nancy Pelosi had to say , & what moves she was planning to further hurt our Country.
” “ Actually , other than her usual complaining that I ’ m a terrible person , she wasn ’ t bad .
Still praying !
” he added .
We are committed to truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Read our editorial standards .

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday that the Democrat-led impeachment effort against President Donald Trump diverted congressional attention away from all other matters, including the unfolding coronavirus pandemic.
Radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt noted during an interview with McConnell that GOP Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas was the first to sound the alarm in mid-January regarding reports coming out of China about the novel coronavirus.
“He was first, and I think Tom was right on the mark,” McConnell responded, “And it came up while we were tied down on the impeachment trial. And I think it diverted the attention of the government, because everything, every day, was all about impeachment. But Tom figured this out early, and he was absolutely right.”
Politico reported on Monday that it was just hours before the beginning of Trump’s impeachment trial on Jan. 21 that Cotton — a U.S. Army combat veteran who now serves on Senate Intelligence Committee — began to worry.
That was the same day the first coronavirus case was detected in the United States, according to a CNN timeline.
“So [Cotton] started badgering the White House to bar travel from China immediately. Cotton called the president, his son-in-law Jared Kushner, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar and other top officials, warning about the dangers of the virus and pressing them to ground flights,” Politico reported.
Trump made the then-controversial decision to ban flights coming out of China into the U.S. on Jan. 31, making the U.S. one of the first nations to do so.
That same week, the president established a coronavirus task force to monitor the unfolding public health situation.
Even as the news coming out of China worsened, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer were pushing for additional witnesses and documents to be included in the impeachment trial, which would have resulted in the proceedings continuing for weeks or perhaps months.
Do you agree with McConnell? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 98% (238 Votes) No: 2% (4 Votes)
On Jan. 31, the GOP-led Senate voted against additional witnesses being introduced and ultimately acquitted Trump on Feb. 5.
McConnell expressed pride in the Senate to pivot from the partisan-charged days of impeachment to come together and unanimously pass a $2.2 trillion coronavirus aid package, despite a last-minute intervention by Pelosi that nearly scuttled a deal Senate Republicans and Democrats had reached.
The speaker had called for so-called “Green New Deal” initiatives, measures to benefit labor unions, and changes to voting laws to be included in the legislation, which McConnell and other Republicans hammered as having nothing to do with the coronavirus outbreak.
“This was a genuine national emergency,” McConnell told Hewitt Tuesday. “And trying to put together a $2 trillion dollar bill in a week was really a herculean task, as you can imagine.
“The way I thought it would work best would be for those of us in the Senate to try to get started on a bipartisan basis, and we were doing really quite well, as you may recall, until the speaker of the House decided to insert herself into the process, which created a couple of days of unnecessary partisan sniping. But we got past that.”
On Sunday, Pelosi accused Trump of not working urgently enough to address the coronavirus pandemic.
“We should be taking every precaution. What the president, his denial at the beginning, was deadly,” Pelosi told host Jake Tapper on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
The speaker also referenced the question made famous during the 1973 Watergate impeachment hearings against then-President Richard Nixon: “What did the president know and when did he know it?”
“I don’t know what the scientists said to him, when did this president know about this, and what did he know? What did he know and when did he know it? That’s for an after-action review,” Pelosi said.
“But as the president fiddles, people are dying. And we just have to take every precaution,” she added.
Pelosi asked the same question on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” on Tuesday, wondering what and when scientists were advising Trump about COVID-19.
Republican Party national spokeswoman Elizabeth Harrington responded to Pelosi’s interview, tweeting, “Democrats are so impeachment obsessed, Pelosi is trying to turn a virus from Wuhan into Watergate.
“‘What did he know & when did he know it?’ Is she talking about Xi? POTUS mobilized CDC, created task force, and stopped travel, while Dems wasted our time on a Ukraine witch hunt.”
Democrats are so impeachment obsessed, Pelosi is trying to turn a virus from Wuhan into Watergate “What did he know & when did he know it?” Is she talking about Xi? POTUS mobilized CDC, created task force, and stopped travel, while Dems wasted our time on a Ukraine witch hunt pic.twitter.com/Erfee6VL4i — Elizabeth Harrington (@LizRNC) March 31, 2020
Following Pelosi’s Sunday CNN interview, Trump called her a “sick puppy” and a “disgrace,” in response to her claim his administration is costing people’s lives.
However, the president wasn’t as critical of Pelosi’s MSNBC interview, writing in a Twitter post:
“I watched a portion of low rated (very) Morning Psycho (Joe) this Morning in order to see what Nancy Pelosi had to say, & what moves she was planning to further hurt our Country.”
I watched a portion of low rated (very) Morning Psycho (Joe) this Morning in order to see what Nancy Pelosi had to say, & what moves she was planning to further hurt our Country. Actually, other than her usual complaining that I’m a terrible person, she wasn’t bad. Still praying! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 31, 2020
“Actually, other than her usual complaining that I’m a terrible person, she wasn’t bad. Still praying!” he added.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-31--CA Had 21,000 Emergency Hospital Beds Thanks to GOP Gov, But Dems Cut Them and Never Replaced

Whenever a Democratic politician controls the purse strings , money is no object for pet causes that can be funded to effectively buy votes .
When it comes to mundane , necessary expenditures such as preparing for a pandemic , however , Democrats suddenly become the biggest skinflints .
The coronavirus pandemic is laying bare all kinds of government failures , not the least of which is state governments that had the chance to prepare for the eventuality of a pandemic but refused .
One such example is in the state of California which previously had the supplies and government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but ultimately dismantled it .
Current California Democratic Gov .
Gavin Newsom spoke in front of the navy hospital ship Mercy on Friday about the importance of making “ good decisions ” in the effort to stop the spread of coronavirus , which has so far sickened 7,477 and killed 150 in the state , according to Johns Hopkins .
“ It ’ s our capacity , individual capacity , to continue to make good decisions on physical distancing and continue to maintain our strict standards in the state of CA — standards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that we must continue to advance , ” Newsom said .
TRENDING : While Dems Lie About Trump 's CDC Budget , Turns Out Obama Requested Millions in Cuts Despite the reassuring optics , what Newsom does not say is that his state is facing a crisis for which they are woefully unprepared despite the work of previous administrations .
According to the Los Angeles Times , beginning in 2006 when Republican Gov .
Arnold Schwarzenegger was in office , the state put millions of taxpayer dollars into disaster preparedness , citing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as earthquakes as well as possible flu pandemics and bioterrorism .
“ In light of the pandemic flu risk , it is absolutely a critical investment , ” Schwarzenegger stated during a news conference at the time .
“ I ’ m not willing to gamble with the people ’ s safety.
” The state spent the next several years and over $ 200 million dollars stockpiling medical supplies and preparing mobile hospital units in the event of a natural or widespread medical disaster .
Included in the stockpile were supplies that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic , such as protective masks and ventilators .
The three mobile hospital units would have had the capability of treating 600 COVID-19 patients at a time .
The total amount of medical equipment and supplies was enough to provide an additional 21,000 hospital beds over and above the mobile units .
All of that would have been very useful right now , but instead California coronavirus patients today are out of luck .
When Democratic Gov .
Jerry Brown took over , he slashed state funding required to maintain the stockpile and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for a $ 26 million budget shortfall .
The supplies were disbursed free of charge to hospitals which meant no funding was collected to pay to replenish them .
Whatever wasn ’ t distributed from the stockpile or used up during wildfire outbreaks was left to expire , including masks from the state ’ s stockpile of 50 million .
It would have cost around $ 5.8 million to maintain the existing stockpile , but when coronavirus hit , the number of masks was down to 21 million .
RELATED : Schwarzenegger Takes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Climate Change Meeting with Greta Thunberg Even after the state budget turned around , with some years ending with a budget surplus in the billions , disaster preparedness and pandemic readiness were not revived .
But after destroying the state ’ s ability to deal with a pandemic like coronavirus , one project Brown had no problem continuing to dump taxpayer dollars into was the money pit known as the California High-Speed Rail project .
The railroad was meant to connect Los Angeles to San Francisco , but Forbes reported that the colossal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , carried a hefty price tag of $ 100 billion .
Under President Donald Trump , federal funding for the fiscal disaster was revoked .
This year , California is on track to enjoy a $ 7 billion surplus for the 2020-2021 budget year , according to a November report from the Sacramento Bee , but the state seems more interested in allocating money anywhere but emergency preparedness .
Currently , Newsom has no trouble opening public coffers to give illegal immigrants free healthcare even as his administration refuses to cooperate with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illegal immigration in the first place .
Robby Starbuck , a Cuban American director and producer who shuns leftism because of its impact on his home country , summed up the frustration with this kind of government spending on those who aren ’ t even in the country lawfully .
“ How do citizens living in California feel about their taxes paying for illegal immigrant ’ s healthcare ?
Thoughts ?
” he tweeted .
“ As someone who left the state in 2019 it just reminds me why I left , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lives of foreign nationals who entered the U.S. illegally.
” The government of California had the chance to remain pandemic-ready long before coronavirus even surfaced , but instead simply squandered it .
Now that the state is facing the crisis head-on , their failure is shockingly apparent .
As the old adage often attributed to Benjamin Franklin rings true for California : “ If you fail to plan , you are planning to fail !
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial @ @

Whenever a Democratic politician controls the purse strings, money is no object for pet causes that can be funded to effectively buy votes. When it comes to mundane, necessary expenditures such as preparing for a pandemic, however, Democrats suddenly become the biggest skinflints.
The coronavirus pandemic is laying bare all kinds of government failures, not the least of which is state governments that had the chance to prepare for the eventuality of a pandemic but refused.
One such example is in the state of California which previously had the supplies and government infrastructure ready to deal with a pandemic but ultimately dismantled it.
Current California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom spoke in front of the navy hospital ship Mercy on Friday about the importance of making “good decisions” in the effort to stop the spread of coronavirus, which has so far sickened 7,477 and killed 150 in the state, according to Johns Hopkins.
“It’s our capacity, individual capacity, to continue to make good decisions on physical distancing and continue to maintain our strict standards in the state of CA — standards as it relates to our stay-at-home orders that we must continue to advance,” Newsom said.
“It’s our capacity, individual capacity, to continue to make good decisions on physical distancing and continue to maintain our strict standards in the state of CA — standards as it relates to our stay-at-home orders that we must continue to advance.” – Governor @GavinNewsom pic.twitter.com/Xle8ZbLtRE — Office of the Governor of California (@CAgovernor) March 29, 2020
Despite the reassuring optics, what Newsom does not say is that his state is facing a crisis for which they are woefully unprepared despite the work of previous administrations.
According to the Los Angeles Times, beginning in 2006 when Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger was in office, the state put millions of taxpayer dollars into disaster preparedness, citing the state’s vulnerability to natural disasters such as earthquakes as well as possible flu pandemics and bioterrorism.
Do you agree that the Democrats destroyed California's pandemic readiness? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 99% (2527 Votes) No: 1% (15 Votes)
“In light of the pandemic flu risk, it is absolutely a critical investment,” Schwarzenegger stated during a news conference at the time. “I’m not willing to gamble with the people’s safety.”
The state spent the next several years and over $200 million dollars stockpiling medical supplies and preparing mobile hospital units in the event of a natural or widespread medical disaster.
Included in the stockpile were supplies that would be useful during the current coronavirus pandemic, such as protective masks and ventilators. The three mobile hospital units would have had the capability of treating 600 COVID-19 patients at a time. The total amount of medical equipment and supplies was enough to provide an additional 21,000 hospital beds over and above the mobile units.
All of that would have been very useful right now, but instead California coronavirus patients today are out of luck. When Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown took over, he slashed state funding required to maintain the stockpile and mobile hospitals, hoping to make up for a $26 million budget shortfall.
The supplies were disbursed free of charge to hospitals which meant no funding was collected to pay to replenish them. Whatever wasn’t distributed from the stockpile or used up during wildfire outbreaks was left to expire, including masks from the state’s stockpile of 50 million. It would have cost around $5.8 million to maintain the existing stockpile, but when coronavirus hit, the number of masks was down to 21 million.
Even after the state budget turned around, with some years ending with a budget surplus in the billions, disaster preparedness and pandemic readiness were not revived.
But after destroying the state’s ability to deal with a pandemic like coronavirus, one project Brown had no problem continuing to dump taxpayer dollars into was the money pit known as the California High-Speed Rail project.
The railroad was meant to connect Los Angeles to San Francisco, but Forbes reported that the colossal failure, which remains unfinished at present, carried a hefty price tag of $100 billion. Under President Donald Trump, federal funding for the fiscal disaster was revoked.
This year, California is on track to enjoy a $7 billion surplus for the 2020-2021 budget year, according to a November report from the Sacramento Bee, but the state seems more interested in allocating money anywhere but emergency preparedness.
Currently, Newsom has no trouble opening public coffers to give illegal immigrants free healthcare even as his administration refuses to cooperate with the federal government to curb the influx of illegal immigration in the first place.
Robby Starbuck, a Cuban American director and producer who shuns leftism because of its impact on his home country, summed up the frustration with this kind of government spending on those who aren’t even in the country lawfully.
“How do citizens living in California feel about their taxes paying for illegal immigrant’s healthcare? Thoughts?” he tweeted. “As someone who left the state in 2019 it just reminds me why I left, it’s not our job to subsidize the lives of foreign nationals who entered the U.S. illegally.”
How do citizens living in California feel about their taxes paying for illegal immigrant’s healthcare? Thoughts? As someone who left the state in 2019 it just reminds me why I left, it’s not our job to subsidize the lives of foreign nationals who entered the U.S. illegally. https://t.co/eDxyVOUPwN — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) January 10, 2020
The government of California had the chance to remain pandemic-ready long before coronavirus even surfaced, but instead simply squandered it. Now that the state is facing the crisis head-on, their failure is shockingly apparent.
As the old adage often attributed to Benjamin Franklin rings true for California: “If you fail to plan, you are planning to fail!”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-31--Trump Calls for ‘Phase 4’ of Coronavirus Response ‘Focused Solely on Jobs’ and Infrastructure

President Donald Trump has called for a $ 2 trillion infrastructure bill as “ Phase 4 ” of the government ’ s coronavirus response efforts .
“ With interest rates for the United States being at ZERO , this is the time to do our decades long awaited Infrastructure Bill , ” Trump tweeted Tuesday .
“ It should be VERY BIG & BOLD , Two Trillion Dollars , and be focused solely on jobs and rebuilding the once great infrastructure of our Country !
Phase 4.
” TRENDING : While Dems Lie About Trump ’ s CDC Budget , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump has wanted a major infrastructure bill since he became president , and is now pitching the idea as a form of economic stimulus in response to the COVID-19 pandemic , Fox News reported .
Lawmakers in Congress are already seeking a fourth coronavirus response bill days after the Coronavirus Aid , Relief , and Economic Security Act was passed .
“ I think the odds are we ’ ll need more legislation , ” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said last week , according to The Hill .
“ First , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the crisis in terms of the magnitude , so that could rise .
But there are going to be problems that we don ’ t realize now that we ’ re going to have to grapple with.
” Democrats are reportedly seeking additional funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and emissions restrictions on airlines in the next stimulus package , Fox News reported .
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also wants to see pension protection language in the next bill .
“ Pension protections — we had a protection in the legislation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ she said on the House floor last week .
“ The president of The United States supported it , but [ Senate Majority Leader Mitch ] McConnell said he would save it for the bill .
So that ’ s why I ’ m mentioning it , for the next bill.
” Republican leaders , however , are waiting to see the impact of the first three phases before jumping onboard with a fourth .
“ I think we ’ ll have to wait and see , ” McConnell said Tuesday on “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this bill was only signed into law last Friday .
So it ’ s only been law for about four days .
And the speaker is already talking about another bill.
” When asked what the priorities were when tackling the coronavirus epidemic during a media conference last week , Trump did not hesitate to say that the government needed to take care of Americans first .
“ The priority is life and safety , and then the economy , ” Trump said .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ editorial standards .

President Donald Trump has called for a $2 trillion infrastructure bill as “Phase 4” of the government’s coronavirus response efforts.
“With interest rates for the United States being at ZERO, this is the time to do our decades long awaited Infrastructure Bill,” Trump tweeted Tuesday.
With interest rates for the United States being at ZERO, this is the time to do our decades long awaited Infrastructure Bill. It should be VERY BIG & BOLD, Two Trillion Dollars, and be focused solely on jobs and rebuilding the once great infrastructure of our Country! Phase 4 — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 31, 2020
“It should be VERY BIG & BOLD, Two Trillion Dollars, and be focused solely on jobs and rebuilding the once great infrastructure of our Country! Phase 4.”
Trump has wanted a major infrastructure bill since he became president, and is now pitching the idea as a form of economic stimulus in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Fox News reported.
Lawmakers in Congress are already seeking a fourth coronavirus response bill days after the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act was passed.
“I think the odds are we’ll need more legislation,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said last week, according to The Hill.
“First, we don’t know the extent of the crisis in terms of the magnitude, so that could rise. But there are going to be problems that we don’t realize now that we’re going to have to grapple with.”
Do you think Congress should wait to see how the first three phases play out before drafting a fourth? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 63% (511 Votes) No: 37% (306 Votes)
Democrats are reportedly seeking additional funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and emissions restrictions on airlines in the next stimulus package, Fox News reported.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also wants to see pension protection language in the next bill.
“Pension protections — we had a protection in the legislation. It was supported by everyone,” she said on the House floor last week.
“The president of The United States supported it, but [Senate Majority Leader Mitch] McConnell said he would save it for the bill. So that’s why I’m mentioning it, for the next bill.”
Republican leaders, however, are waiting to see the impact of the first three phases before jumping onboard with a fourth.
“I think we’ll have to wait and see,” McConnell said Tuesday on “The Hugh Hewitt Show.
“Remember, this bill was only signed into law last Friday. So it’s only been law for about four days. And the speaker is already talking about another bill.”
When asked what the priorities were when tackling the coronavirus epidemic during a media conference last week, Trump did not hesitate to say that the government needed to take care of Americans first.
Watch the latest video at foxnews.com
“The priority is life and safety, and then the economy,” Trump said.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-31--Bob Ehrlich: Coronavirus Offering Students a New Opportunity To Learn

Millions of America ’ s best and brightest students have returned home only midway through their spring semester .
Their coursework will continue , of course , as online education assumes center stage for the foreseeable future .
Only those of us of a certain age recall how “ distance learning ” was once such a curiosity .
The considerable downside of this course of events is obvious , especially for the talented athletes and artistic types forced to miss their spring performances or games .
A special sadness is reserved for the seniors , most of whom will choose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ again next year even if given the option .
The upside of this new normal for America ’ s undergraduates is an opportunity to step back and re-examine newly acquired opinions , to think anew — maybe even begin to question some of the progressive indoctrination they have been force-fed by overwhelmingly leftist professors in the social sciences and humanities and their administrative enablers .
Here , a First Amendment redux is long overdue .
Why not a reminder of how the ’ 60s-era free speech movement changed our culture — and how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made-up constructs such as “ trigger warnings ” and “ safe zones ” represent serious challenges to our First Amendment freedoms .
TRENDING : While Dems Lie About Trump 's CDC Budget , Turns Out Obama Requested Millions in Cuts You might also remind the kids there is no Constitutional right to proceed through life unbothered by those with opposing viewpoints — and that the simple dismissal of contrary opinions as “ racist ” or “ nativist ” or “ homophobic ” is intellectually dishonest , anti-intellectual and empty .
In lieu of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( an academic experience denied many high schoolers these days ) , a concerned parent might suggest Dr. Martin Luther King ’ s “ Letter from Birmingham Jail ” and Nat Hentoff ’ s “ Free Speech for Me — But Not for Thee ” as instructive , thought-provoking reads .
Another timely exercise would be to revisit the history of socialism , beginning with the impressive body counts compiled by a political philosophy that values government over the individual , egalitarianism over merit , autocracy over freedom .
There is an abundance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but a few “ have-to ’ s ” stand out : George Orwell ’ s “ Animal Farm , ” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn ’ s “ The Gulag Archipelago ” and Christopher Hudson ’ s “ The Killing Fields.
” Much of the material covered herein is disturbing — snowflakes might even label it triggering — but that is the point .
In-the-flesh socialism invariably kills ; its history is full of bloodshed and terror .
You can bet your son or daughter will be far less inclined to attend a Bernie rally after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ripe for re-visitation is basic economics — you know , the science of how market capitalism creates competition and wealth .
True , market economies have their shortcomings .
Not everyone is able to compete ( and win ) in a free economy .
But despite some well-analyzed warts , free market capitalism remains the reason our country is so rich , and why so many people from around the world continue to want to come here .
Again , there is a long list of texts worthy of a young person ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Milton Friedman ’ s “ Capitalism and Freedom ” and anything written by the brilliant economist Thomas Sowell .
The silliness ( and danger ) of political correctness is another timely exercise .
Indeed , examples abound in the time of the coronavirus .
Recall how quickly Joe Biden associated the president ’ s early travel restrictions on Chinese nationals with “ xenophobia , ” “ fear-mongering , ” and “ hysteria.
” A senior Biden campaign aide went so far as to say that labeling COVID-19 a “ Chinese virus ” was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ usual practice of associating a new disease with its point of origin ( “ German Measles , ” “ West Nile Virus , ” “ West African Ebola ” ) .
A compliant media of course piled on until the appropriateness of the executive order became apparent to all .
RELATED : Op-Ed : Universities Should Refund Students for Classes Lost to Coronavirus Finally , these challenging times remind us of how fragile life — and liberty — can be .
Such is a difficult lesson for the young and healthy , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the importance of self-sacrifice and selflessness in times of danger and uncertainty .
Such times also help us appreciate the importance of leaders , as opposed to mere politicians .
There are no better reads in this space than all three installments of William Manchester ’ s “ The Last Lion : Winston Spencer Churchill ” and David Herbert Donald ’ s “ Lincoln.
” Those who have raised children ( and paid the considerable freight for their education ) have the absolute right to instill their values into their sons and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are lost by attrition or indoctrination by the progressive elites that control American public secondary and higher education .
With the collective timeout recently imposed on our coronavirus-ridden society , now may be the right time to revisit the social and moral mores you instilled in them in the first place .
It may indeed be your last opportunity .
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website .
We are committed to truth and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Read our editorial standards .

Millions of America’s best and brightest students have returned home only midway through their spring semester.
Their coursework will continue, of course, as online education assumes center stage for the foreseeable future. Only those of us of a certain age recall how “distance learning” was once such a curiosity.
The considerable downside of this course of events is obvious, especially for the talented athletes and artistic types forced to miss their spring performances or games. A special sadness is reserved for the seniors, most of whom will choose to forgo their final opportunity to compete again next year even if given the option.
The upside of this new normal for America’s undergraduates is an opportunity to step back and re-examine newly acquired opinions, to think anew — maybe even begin to question some of the progressive indoctrination they have been force-fed by overwhelmingly leftist professors in the social sciences and humanities and their administrative enablers.
Here, a First Amendment redux is long overdue. Why not a reminder of how the ’60s-era free speech movement changed our culture — and how the political-correctness-inspired campaign to curtail speech through made-up constructs such as “trigger warnings” and “safe zones” represent serious challenges to our First Amendment freedoms.
You might also remind the kids there is no Constitutional right to proceed through life unbothered by those with opposing viewpoints — and that the simple dismissal of contrary opinions as “racist” or “nativist” or “homophobic” is intellectually dishonest, anti-intellectual and empty.
In lieu of a protracted remedial course in American history (an academic experience denied many high schoolers these days), a concerned parent might suggest Dr. Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and Nat Hentoff’s “Free Speech for Me — But Not for Thee” as instructive, thought-provoking reads.
Another timely exercise would be to revisit the history of socialism, beginning with the impressive body counts compiled by a political philosophy that values government over the individual, egalitarianism over merit, autocracy over freedom.
There is an abundance to read here, of course, but a few “have-to’s” stand out: George Orwell’s “Animal Farm,” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s “The Gulag Archipelago” and Christopher Hudson’s “The Killing Fields.”
Much of the material covered herein is disturbing — snowflakes might even label it triggering — but that is the point. In-the-flesh socialism invariably kills; its history is full of bloodshed and terror. You can bet your son or daughter will be far less inclined to attend a Bernie rally after these reading assignments.
A third area ripe for re-visitation is basic economics — you know, the science of how market capitalism creates competition and wealth. True, market economies have their shortcomings. Not everyone is able to compete (and win) in a free economy. But despite some well-analyzed warts, free market capitalism remains the reason our country is so rich, and why so many people from around the world continue to want to come here.
Again, there is a long list of texts worthy of a young person’s time, but must-reads here include Milton Friedman’s “Capitalism and Freedom” and anything written by the brilliant economist Thomas Sowell.
The silliness (and danger) of political correctness is another timely exercise. Indeed, examples abound in the time of the coronavirus. Recall how quickly Joe Biden associated the president’s early travel restrictions on Chinese nationals with “xenophobia,” “fear-mongering,” and “hysteria.”
A senior Biden campaign aide went so far as to say that labeling COVID-19 a “Chinese virus” was a racial slur, thereby ignoring the usual practice of associating a new disease with its point of origin (“German Measles,” “West Nile Virus,” “West African Ebola”). A compliant media of course piled on until the appropriateness of the executive order became apparent to all.
Finally, these challenging times remind us of how fragile life — and liberty — can be.
Such is a difficult lesson for the young and healthy, but our present circumstance serves to remind us of the importance of self-sacrifice and selflessness in times of danger and uncertainty. Such times also help us appreciate the importance of leaders, as opposed to mere politicians.
There are no better reads in this space than all three installments of William Manchester’s “The Last Lion: Winston Spencer Churchill” and David Herbert Donald’s “Lincoln.”
Those who have raised children (and paid the considerable freight for their education) have the absolute right to instill their values into their sons and daughters. Too often, those values are lost by attrition or indoctrination by the progressive elites that control American public secondary and higher education.
With the collective timeout recently imposed on our coronavirus-ridden society, now may be the right time to revisit the social and moral mores you instilled in them in the first place. It may indeed be your last opportunity.
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-31--Something Fishy: Woman Who Blamed Trump for Husband’s Poisoning Is a Democratic Donor

It ’ s a side of the story the national media will be studiously ignoring .
When an Arizona man died after ingesting fish tank cleaner as part of a twisted effort to avoid infection from the coronavirus shortly after President Donald Trump discussed potentially lifesaving drugs at a March 29 White House news conference , it didn ’ t take long for the media to start pinning the blame for the death on the president ’ s words .
It didn ’ t matter , obviously , that anyone who self-medicates with fish tank cleaner might not be making @ @ @ @ @ @ @ didn ’ t matter that Trump had discussed a different substance entirely from what the man and his wife ingested — the anti-malarial drug chloroquine , versus a fish tank cleaner containing chloroquine phosphate .
TRENDING : While Dems Lie About Trump 's CDC Budget , Turns Out Obama Requested Millions in Cuts What mattered was bashing Trump , and if that meant cynically using a 68-year-old man ’ s death to do it , the mainstream media has already proven its animosity to the president knows no bounds .
And the willingness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hold Trump responsible for her husband ’ s utterly avoidable death had to be irresistible .
“ Trump kept saying it was basically pretty much a cure , ” the unidentified woman told NBC ’ s Vaughn Hillyard in a March 23 interview from her intensive care unit .
“ Oh , my God .
Don ’ t take anything .
Don ’ t believe anything .
Don ’ t believe anything that the president says and his people.
” For the rest of the media , the narrative was set .
An @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the coronavirus , had foolishly listened to the president of the United States and innocently poisoned themselves on his misguided advice .
But as Alana Goodman wrote at the Washington Free Beacon on Monday , that wasn ’ t quite the whole story .
The woman , now identified only by the first name of Wanda , aged 61 , has been a reliable financial supporter of liberal causes during the Trump presidency , Goodman reported .
“ Federal Election Commission records show that Wanda has donated thousands of dollars to Democratic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two years , including Hillary Clinton , the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee , and EMILY ’ s List , a group that aims to elect pro-choice female candidates , ” Goodman wrote .
RELATED : While Dems Lie About Trump 's CDC Budget , Turns Out Obama Requested Millions in Cuts Tellingly , her interest in supporting Democrats seems to have coincided with the emergence of Trump .
Her first recorded donation was in 2016 — $ 150 to Hillary Clinton ’ s campaign , Goodman reported .
After Trump ’ s upset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 550 to the Democratic National Committee in 2017 , Goodman wrote .
Her financial commitment to the anti-Trump cause apparently kept rising .
Since 2018 , according to Goodman , Wanda has donated $ 6,000 to “ Democratic electoral groups.
” Obviously , this isn ’ t the story the media presented to the American people .
But is it reasonable to think that someone who apparently loathes the president is going to take his off-the-cuff medical advice to heart enough to put fish tank cleaner in a soda and drink it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
A large number of commenters on social media didn ’ t think so .
And if a woman who supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 and has donated more than $ 6,000 to Democratic causes during the Trump presidency suddenly decides to ingest poison because Trump said a similar-sounding drug just might have the potential to be effective against coronavirus infection , that ’ s her right .
But plenty of Americans are going to have trouble believing that — like the Twitter user Techno Fog , whose Monday evening Twitter thread was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ site Twitchy.com .
“ A curious media would get the 911 call and see if there was an autopsy , ” the Techno Fog thread concludes .
But that would require an American media that ’ s “ curious ” about anything that doesn ’ t involve damaging Donald Trump — and the American public should know all too well how that works .
While the mainstream media engaged in savage attacks on then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 , it had no interest in reporting on the many obvious holes in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or what might have been her motivation .
When former Vice President Joe Biden was accused only last week of a graphic sexual assault allegedly involving a young woman on his office staff in the early 1990s , the national media turned a blind eye — and has kept it turned .
As Fox News noted on Sunday , NBC ’ s Chuck Todd interviewed Biden on Sunday , and CNN ’ s Anderson Cooper hosted a virtual town hall with the former vice president on Friday , and the new allegations never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media marked more by its political agenda and intellectual dishonesty , voters know there ’ s going to be a side of the story that will be ignored – even if it ’ s crucial to understanding the whole .
In the fishy fish tank story , thanks to the Free Beacon , ignoring that side just got a lot harder .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

It’s a side of the story the national media will be studiously ignoring.
When an Arizona man died after ingesting fish tank cleaner as part of a twisted effort to avoid infection from the coronavirus shortly after President Donald Trump discussed potentially lifesaving drugs at a March 29 White House news conference, it didn’t take long for the media to start pinning the blame for the death on the president’s words.
It didn’t matter, obviously, that anyone who self-medicates with fish tank cleaner might not be making the best decisions in life.
It didn’t matter that Trump had discussed a different substance entirely from what the man and his wife ingested — the anti-malarial drug chloroquine, versus a fish tank cleaner containing chloroquine phosphate.
NBC News and CNN, your coverage is misleading and false! An Arizona man tragically died because he swallowed Fish Tank Cleaner and not these prescribed human medications. It doesn’t matter if you like @realDonaldTrump or not. You have a responsibility to report the facts! pic.twitter.com/RHr0v6TIEH — Price of Reason (@priceoreason) March 24, 2020
What mattered was bashing Trump, and if that meant cynically using a 68-year-old man’s death to do it, the mainstream media has already proven its animosity to the president knows no bounds.
And the willingness of the man’s wife to hold Trump responsible for her husband’s utterly avoidable death had to be irresistible.
“Trump kept saying it was basically pretty much a cure,” the unidentified woman told NBC’s Vaughn Hillyard in a March 23 interview from her intensive care unit. “Oh, my God. Don’t take anything. Don’t believe anything. Don’t believe anything that the president says and his people.”
For the rest of the media, the narrative was set.
An older couple, self-isolating to save themselves from the coronavirus, had foolishly listened to the president of the United States and innocently poisoned themselves on his misguided advice.
But as Alana Goodman wrote at the Washington Free Beacon on Monday, that wasn’t quite the whole story.
The woman, now identified only by the first name of Wanda, aged 61, has been a reliable financial supporter of liberal causes during the Trump presidency, Goodman reported.
“Federal Election Commission records show that Wanda has donated thousands of dollars to Democratic electoral groups and candidates over the past two years, including Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and EMILY’s List, a group that aims to elect pro-choice female candidates,” Goodman wrote.
Tellingly, her interest in supporting Democrats seems to have coincided with the emergence of Trump.
Her first recorded donation was in 2016 — $150 to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, Goodman reported.
After Trump’s upset victory in November 2016, she gave $550 to the Democratic National Committee in 2017, Goodman wrote.
Her financial commitment to the anti-Trump cause apparently kept rising. Since 2018, according to Goodman, Wanda has donated $6,000 to “Democratic electoral groups.”
Obviously, this isn’t the story the media presented to the American people.
But is it reasonable to think that someone who apparently loathes the president is going to take his off-the-cuff medical advice to heart enough to put fish tank cleaner in a soda and drink it to ward off the possibility of contagion?
A large number of commenters on social media didn’t think so.
If this woman trusted Trump, it would be the first time – sorry, not buying it.https://t.co/eNhNA9rfVe — Scott Farkus (@FarkusScott) March 31, 2020
WELL, THAT EXPLAINS A LOT — Wuhan Virus Watch: Woman Who Self-Medicated with Fius newspolsh Tank Cleaner and Blamed Trump, Donated Big to Democrats https://t.co/42Q1TqnafC — Cletus (@Cletus1942) March 31, 2020
Trump is hopeful about a drug, a Trump-hating woman “spontaneously” decides that Trump explicitly recommended eating fish tank cleaner, her husband dies, and the media has a ready-made headline. No matter how you spin it, it’s a fishy story, at best. https://t.co/r4hQAMFCt6 — Nicki Scroggin (@NickiScroggin) March 31, 2020
Of course, it’s a free country.
And if a woman who supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 and has donated more than $6,000 to Democratic causes during the Trump presidency suddenly decides to ingest poison because Trump said a similar-sounding drug just might have the potential to be effective against coronavirus infection, that’s her right.
But plenty of Americans are going to have trouble believing that — like the Twitter user Techno Fog, whose Monday evening Twitter thread was showcased Tuesday on the conservative Twitter aggregating site Twitchy.com.
“A curious media would get the 911 call and see if there was an autopsy,” the Techno Fog thread concludes.
But that would require an American media that’s “curious” about anything that doesn’t involve damaging Donald Trump — and the American public should know all too well how that works.
Does this revelation change your view of the poisoning story? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 62% (510 Votes) No: 38% (310 Votes)
While the mainstream media engaged in savage attacks on then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018, it had no interest in reporting on the many obvious holes in his main accuser’s story, or what might have been her motivation.
When former Vice President Joe Biden was accused only last week of a graphic sexual assault allegedly involving a young woman on his office staff in the early 1990s, the national media turned a blind eye — and has kept it turned.
As Fox News noted on Sunday, NBC’s Chuck Todd interviewed Biden on Sunday, and CNN’s Anderson Cooper hosted a virtual town hall with the former vice president on Friday, and the new allegations never came up.
With a modern American media marked more by its political agenda and intellectual dishonesty, voters know there’s going to be a side of the story that will be ignored – even if it’s crucial to understanding the whole.
In the fishy fish tank story, thanks to the Free Beacon, ignoring that side just got a lot harder.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-31--House Republicans Push Bill To Take Back the $25 Million Kennedy Center Received in Coronavirus Bill

House Republicans are planning to introduce a bill to take back the $ 25 million that the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts received in the COVID-19 response bill , citing the fact that the center furloughed orchestra members hours after the bill was signed into law .
Wisconsin Republican Rep. Bryan Steil said he planned to introduce the bill that would take back the money given to the center , according to the Washington Examiner .
“ This money should be spent fighting the virus or in taxpayers ’ pockets !
” Steil tweeted .
House Minority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the idea Monday night on Fox News .
“ Nancy Pelosi literally held the bill up for days to get her pet projects including the money for the Kennedy Center .
Interesting she ’ d use the choice of words ‘ fiddlers ’ because it was the fiddlers , the violin players , all the musicians at the Kennedy Center that got laid off right as the bill got signed , ” Scalise told Tucker Carlson .
TRENDING : While Dems Lie About Trump 's CDC Budget , Turns Out Obama Requested Millions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that money back , ” Scalise said .
“ But it shows you how misguided Pelosi ’ s priorities were , ” Scalise added .
The Democrats included $ 25 million in taxpayer funding for the Kennedy Center in the Coronavirus Aid , Relief , and Economic Security Act , which they were originally criticized for before winning the support of President Donald Trump himself .
“ That was a Democrat request .
That was not my request , ” Trump said .
“ But you got to give them something.
” Hours @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CARES Act into law Friday , an email obtained by the Washington Free Beacon said 96 members of the National Symphony Orchestra will no longer receive paychecks after April 3 .
“ The Covid-19 Advisory Committee was broadsided today during our conversation with [ Kennedy Center President ] Deborah Rutter , ” the email read .
“ Ms .
Rutter abruptly informed us today that the last paycheck for all musicians and librarians will be April 3 and that we will not be paid again until the Center reopens.
” The email added @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their April 3 paycheck will be their last .
“ We understand this will come [ as a ] shock to all of you , as it did us , ” the email read .
On March 12 , the Kennedy Center announced it would cancel all public performances and events and shut its doors to the public through March 31 .
The cancelations were later extended through May 10 .
In a statement to the Washington Examiner , the president of the Local 161-710 of the American Federation of Musicians criticized the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decision , from an organization with an endowment of nearly $ 100 million , is not only outrageous — coming after the musicians had expressed their willingness to discuss ways to accommodate the Kennedy Center during this challenging time — it is also blatantly illegal under the parties ’ collective bargaining agreement , ” Ed Malaga said .
“ That agreement specifically requires that the Center provide six weeks ’ notice before it can stop paying musicians for economic reasons.
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism @ @ @ @ @ @

House Republicans are planning to introduce a bill to take back the $25 million that the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts received in the COVID-19 response bill, citing the fact that the center furloughed orchestra members hours after the bill was signed into law.
Wisconsin Republican Rep. Bryan Steil said he planned to introduce the bill that would take back the money given to the center, according to the Washington Examiner.
“This money should be spent fighting the virus or in taxpayers’ pockets!” Steil tweeted.
House Minority Whip Steve Scalise voiced his support for the idea Monday night on Fox News.
“Nancy Pelosi literally held the bill up for days to get her pet projects including the money for the Kennedy Center. Interesting she’d use the choice of words ‘fiddlers’ because it was the fiddlers, the violin players, all the musicians at the Kennedy Center that got laid off right as the bill got signed,” Scalise told Tucker Carlson.
“They ought to give that money back,” Scalise said.
In the middle of a national emergency, Nancy Pelosi fought to give the Kennedy Center $25 MILLION…and then they stopped paying their musicians anyway. RT if you agree → Congress should take that money back and give it to hospitals and hardworking families in need. pic.twitter.com/RtY354yUoc — Steve Scalise (@SteveScalise) March 31, 2020
“But it shows you how misguided Pelosi’s priorities were,” Scalise added.
Do you think the center should give the money back? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 100% (4590 Votes) No: 0% (17 Votes)
The Democrats included $25 million in taxpayer funding for the Kennedy Center in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, which they were originally criticized for before winning the support of President Donald Trump himself.
“That was a Democrat request. That was not my request,” Trump said.
“But you got to give them something.”
Hours after Trump signed the $2 trillion CARES Act into law Friday, an email obtained by the Washington Free Beacon said 96 members of the National Symphony Orchestra will no longer receive paychecks after April 3.
“The Covid-19 Advisory Committee was broadsided today during our conversation with [Kennedy Center President] Deborah Rutter,” the email read.
“Ms. Rutter abruptly informed us today that the last paycheck for all musicians and librarians will be April 3 and that we will not be paid again until the Center reopens.”
The email added that orchestra members should continue as if their April 3 paycheck will be their last.
“We understand this will come [as a] shock to all of you, as it did us,” the email read.
On March 12, the Kennedy Center announced it would cancel all public performances and events and shut its doors to the public through March 31.
The cancelations were later extended through May 10.
In a statement to the Washington Examiner, the president of the Local 161-710 of the American Federation of Musicians criticized the center for its decision.
“This decision, from an organization with an endowment of nearly $100 million, is not only outrageous — coming after the musicians had expressed their willingness to discuss ways to accommodate the Kennedy Center during this challenging time — it is also blatantly illegal under the parties’ collective bargaining agreement,” Ed Malaga said.
“That agreement specifically requires that the Center provide six weeks’ notice before it can stop paying musicians for economic reasons.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-31--NFL team Owners Vote To Expand Playoffs Starting in 2020 Season

NFL team owners voted Tuesday to expand the playoffs next season by one team in each conference , for a total of 14 , as they continue to plan for the 2020 season to begin on time .
During a conference call to discuss league business after the annual meetings were canceled due to the new coronavirus , the owners also awarded one of those extra games to CBS and one to NBC .
Three-fourths of the 32 owners needed to approve the change , and the vote was unanimous , football operations chief Troy Vincent said .
TRENDING : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CDC Budget , Turns Out Obama Requested Millions in Cuts As for opening the season on Sept. 10 as scheduled , NFL lead counsel Jeff Pash said : “ All of our focus has been on a normal traditional season , starting on time , playing before fans in our regular stadiums and going through our full 16-game regular season and a full playoffs.
” Contingencies , however , are being discussed for potential interruptions caused by the coronavirus .
As for the first expansion of the postseason field since 1990 , when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 12 , only the teams with the best record in the AFC and NFC will get a bye under the new format ; the top two teams in each conference skipped wild-card weekend in the past .
The seventh seed will play No .
2 , the sixth will visit No .
3 , and the fifth will be at the fourth seed for wild-card games .
Three games are set for Saturday and Sunday , Jan. 9-10 — pending the NFL schedule going forward as planned , of course ; that schedule @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , according to Brian Rolapp , the league ’ s chief media and business officer , to give the NFL “ flexibility.
” CBS will broadcast one of the new games on Jan. 10 at approximately 4:40 p.m. EST .
The game will also be available via live stream on CBS All Access .
A separately produced telecast of the game tailored for a younger audience will air on Nickelodeon .
NBC , its new streaming service Peacock and Spanish-language Telemundo will broadcast the other new game on Jan. 10 at approximately 8:15 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ owners were involved in separate conference calls Tuesday lasting about one hour each .
They were advised of current plans for conducting the draft on April 23-25 .
RELATED : Tom Brady 's Son Reportedly Deciding Factor in Going to Buccaneers Peter O ’ Reilly , who oversees planning of major events such as the Super Bowl and draft , said all of the NFL ’ s preparations have been designed to “ ensure the selection process is sound.
” That means equitable arrangements for every team ; “ celebrating and welcoming ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ providing an escape for our fans and perhaps allowing virtual fan access ” ; and a fundraiser for people and communities affected by the pandemic .
O ’ Reilly stressed that social distancing will be maintained , with no more than 10 people together , remaining at least six feet apart .
Anyone who is ill will be kept away .
Commissioner Roger Goodell will make the first-round selection announcements from a central hub , and the telecasts will have connectivity at the 32 teams and potentially at some players ’ or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said Las Vegas , scheduled to host the draft this year , will get consideration for 2022 ; the 2021 draft will be held in Cleveland .
He said : “ 2022 is an option for Las Vegas.
” “ We need some time to work through that with Las Vegas and the Raiders , but that is something we are considering.
” The Associated Press contributed to this report .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

NFL team owners voted Tuesday to expand the playoffs next season by one team in each conference, for a total of 14, as they continue to plan for the 2020 season to begin on time.
During a conference call to discuss league business after the annual meetings were canceled due to the new coronavirus, the owners also awarded one of those extra games to CBS and one to NBC.
Three-fourths of the 32 owners needed to approve the change, and the vote was unanimous, football operations chief Troy Vincent said.
The NFL owners have confirmed, via a vote on today’s teleconference, that there will be expanded playoffs after the 2020 season, source said. Expected and now official. One more team per conference. — Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) March 31, 2020
As for opening the season on Sept. 10 as scheduled, NFL lead counsel Jeff Pash said: “All of our focus has been on a normal traditional season, starting on time, playing before fans in our regular stadiums and going through our full 16-game regular season and a full playoffs.”
Contingencies, however, are being discussed for potential interruptions caused by the coronavirus.
As for the first expansion of the postseason field since 1990, when the NFL went from 10 qualifiers to 12, only the teams with the best record in the AFC and NFC will get a bye under the new format; the top two teams in each conference skipped wild-card weekend in the past.
The seventh seed will play No. 2, the sixth will visit No. 3, and the fifth will be at the fourth seed for wild-card games.
Do you think expanding the NFL playoffs is a good idea? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 52% (63 Votes) No: 48% (59 Votes)
Three games are set for Saturday and Sunday, Jan. 9-10 — pending the NFL schedule going forward as planned, of course; that schedule likely will be released on May 9, according to Brian Rolapp, the league’s chief media and business officer, to give the NFL “flexibility.”
CBS will broadcast one of the new games on Jan. 10 at approximately 4:40 p.m. EST. The game will also be available via live stream on CBS All Access.
A separately produced telecast of the game tailored for a younger audience will air on Nickelodeon.
NBC, its new streaming service Peacock and Spanish-language Telemundo will broadcast the other new game on Jan. 10 at approximately 8:15 p.m. EST.
Team presidents and then owners were involved in separate conference calls Tuesday lasting about one hour each. They were advised of current plans for conducting the draft on April 23-25.
Wild Card Weekend for the 2020 NFL season now will consist of three games on Saturday, January 9, and three games on Sunday, January 10, 2021. pic.twitter.com/UsZrrbDj1j — Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) March 31, 2020
Peter O’Reilly, who oversees planning of major events such as the Super Bowl and draft, said all of the NFL’s preparations have been designed to “ensure the selection process is sound.”
That means equitable arrangements for every team; “celebrating and welcoming” draftees to the league; fan involvement “providing an escape for our fans and perhaps allowing virtual fan access”; and a fundraiser for people and communities affected by the pandemic.
O’Reilly stressed that social distancing will be maintained, with no more than 10 people together, remaining at least six feet apart. Anyone who is ill will be kept away.
Commissioner Roger Goodell will make the first-round selection announcements from a central hub, and the telecasts will have connectivity at the 32 teams and potentially at some players’ or fans’ homes.
O’Reilly said Las Vegas, scheduled to host the draft this year, will get consideration for 2022; the 2021 draft will be held in Cleveland.
He said: “2022 is an option for Las Vegas.”
“We need some time to work through that with Las Vegas and the Raiders, but that is something we are considering.”
The Western Journal has reviewed this Associated Press story and may have altered it prior to publication to ensure that it meets our editorial standards.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-31--Arrested Florida Pastor’s Legal Team Fires Back Against ‘Discriminatory Application of the Law’

Attorneys for a Florida pastor arrested Monday for holding services during a mandated lockdown are firing back at public officials in Tampa and arguing current policies are discriminatory against churches .
Pastor Rodney Howard-Browne of The River at Tampa Bay Church was arrested Monday on charges of unlawful assembly and violating Hillsborough County ’ s “ safer-at-home ” order , which bans groups of 10 people or more from gathering during the coronavirus outbreak .
The arrest was in response to local law enforcement officials targeting the pastor after images online showed hundreds of people attending a Sunday service at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s arrest , public officials held a news conference in which Hillsborough County Sheriff Chad Chronister and other officials publicly criticized Howard-Browne for his alleged “ reckless disregard for human life.
” “ I believe there ’ s nothing more important than faith during a time like this .
And as a sheriff ’ s office we would never impede someone ’ s ability to lean on their religious beliefs as a means of comfort , ” Chronister told reporters .
TRENDING : While Dems Lie About Trump 's CDC Budget , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ But practicing those beliefs has to be done safely , ” he added .
Howard-Browne bonded out of jail Monday and retained the legal services of the nonprofit Orlando-based Liberty Counsel .
A legal representative for the pastor is arguing the government is overreaching .
“ Sheriff Chad Chronister ’ s press conference was a shaming spectacle full of anger , lacking of facts , complete with a theological lecture about the Bible , ” Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver told Fox News .
“ This over a second-degree misdemeanor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sheriff and Hillsborough County will get a lesson on the Constitution and discriminatory application of the law , ” he said .
Liberty Counsel also released a statement defending the pastor and slamming public officials for clamping down on religious services while other “ essential ” businesses and services remain open .
In the statement , Staver argued that the order banning gatherings should not have applied to Howard-Browne or the church , as church officials maintained stringent social distancing guidelines during both of Sunday ’ s services .
“ Not only did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regarding six-foot distancing , it went above and beyond any other business to ensure the health and safety of the people , ” Staver said .
“ Contrary to Sheriff Chronister ’ s allegation that Pastor Howard-Browne was ‘ reckless , ’ the actions of Hillsborough Country and the Hernando County Sheriff are discriminatory against religion and church gatherings.
” Staver also added the Hillsborough County administrative order “ has so many exceptions it looks like swiss cheese.
” “ The order allows a wide range of commercial operations that are either specifically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a six-foot separation .
Yet , if the purpose of your meeting is religious , the county prohibits it with no exception for the six-foot separation , ” he said .
“ The problem with this administrative order is it was not reviewed by constitutional experts or vetted by a deliberative body .
Neither the Constitution nor Florida law protecting churches and the free exercise of religion disappear , ” Staver went on .
“ This order from Hillsborough County is not narrowly tailored to achieve its underlying objective.
” “ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his press conference before the arrest was completed .
I am astounded that Sheriff Chronister used his press conference to lecture about the Bible , ” Staver concluded .
“ This is entirely inappropriate for a government official to takes sides on religion.
” Liberty Counsel also noted the church took careful precautions to protect the health of its congregation , including enforcing six-foot distancing between groups , offering hand sanitizer , requiring staff to wear gloves and spending $ 100,000 on a “ hospital grade purification system ” designed to kill microbes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has joined other churches across the country in arguing that it is an “ essential ” business during the country ’ s health crisis .
“ The Church is another one of those essential services .
It is a place where people turn for help and for comfort in a climate of fear and uncertainty , ” the church wrote on Facebook .
Howard-Browne accused media outlets of “ stirring up religious bigotry and hate ” on Twitter Monday , but has since made his account private .
The pastor faces a punishment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and fines totaling up to $ 500 for violating Hillsborough County social distancing guidelines .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Attorneys for a Florida pastor arrested Monday for holding services during a mandated lockdown are firing back at public officials in Tampa and arguing current policies are discriminatory against churches.
Pastor Rodney Howard-Browne of The River at Tampa Bay Church was arrested Monday on charges of unlawful assembly and violating Hillsborough County’s “safer-at-home” order, which bans groups of 10 people or more from gathering during the coronavirus outbreak.
The arrest was in response to local law enforcement officials targeting the pastor after images online showed hundreds of people attending a Sunday service at his church.
Prior to the pastor’s arrest, public officials held a news conference in which Hillsborough County Sheriff Chad Chronister and other officials publicly criticized Howard-Browne for his alleged “reckless disregard for human life.”
“I believe there’s nothing more important than faith during a time like this. And as a sheriff’s office we would never impede someone’s ability to lean on their religious beliefs as a means of comfort,” Chronister told reporters.
“But practicing those beliefs has to be done safely,” he added.
Howard-Browne bonded out of jail Monday and retained the legal services of the nonprofit Orlando-based Liberty Counsel.
A legal representative for the pastor is arguing the government is overreaching.
Do you think churches should be deemed "essential" during the COVID-19 crisis? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 68% (450 Votes) No: 32% (216 Votes)
“Sheriff Chad Chronister’s press conference was a shaming spectacle full of anger, lacking of facts, complete with a theological lecture about the Bible,” Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver told Fox News. “This over a second-degree misdemeanor before the arrest occurred.”
“The sheriff and Hillsborough County will get a lesson on the Constitution and discriminatory application of the law,” he said.
Liberty Counsel also released a statement defending the pastor and slamming public officials for clamping down on religious services while other “essential” businesses and services remain open.
In the statement, Staver argued that the order banning gatherings should not have applied to Howard-Browne or the church, as church officials maintained stringent social distancing guidelines during both of Sunday’s services.
“Not only did the church comply with the administrative order regarding six-foot distancing, it went above and beyond any other business to ensure the health and safety of the people,” Staver said.
“Contrary to Sheriff Chronister’s allegation that Pastor Howard-Browne was ‘reckless,’ the actions of Hillsborough Country and the Hernando County Sheriff are discriminatory against religion and church gatherings.”
Staver also added the Hillsborough County administrative order “has so many exceptions it looks like swiss cheese.”
“The order allows a wide range of commercial operations that are either specifically exempt or exempt if they can comply with a six-foot separation. Yet, if the purpose of your meeting is religious, the county prohibits it with no exception for the six-foot separation,” he said.
“The problem with this administrative order is it was not reviewed by constitutional experts or vetted by a deliberative body. Neither the Constitution nor Florida law protecting churches and the free exercise of religion disappear,” Staver went on. “This order from Hillsborough County is not narrowly tailored to achieve its underlying objective.”
“I was shocked that Sheriff Chad Chronister held his press conference before the arrest was completed. I am astounded that Sheriff Chronister used his press conference to lecture about the Bible,” Staver concluded. “This is entirely inappropriate for a government official to takes sides on religion.”
Liberty Counsel also noted the church took careful precautions to protect the health of its congregation, including enforcing six-foot distancing between groups, offering hand sanitizer, requiring staff to wear gloves and spending $100,000 on a “hospital grade purification system” designed to kill microbes.
The River at Tampa Bay Church has joined other churches across the country in arguing that it is an “essential” business during the country’s health crisis.
“The Church is another one of those essential services. It is a place where people turn for help and for comfort in a climate of fear and uncertainty,” the church wrote on Facebook.
Howard-Browne accused media outlets of “stirring up religious bigotry and hate” on Twitter Monday, but has since made his account private.
The pastor faces a punishment of up to 60 days in jail and fines totaling up to $500 for violating Hillsborough County social distancing guidelines.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.