westernjournal--2020-03-21--Advice Pence Gave 7 Months Ago About Prayer Seems Almost Prophetic Today

Seven months ago , Vice President Mike Pence spoke at an event on religious freedom where he was asked for advice about handling political , even personal attacks .
His simple response went viral : Pray more , internet less .
“ I would just say maybe a couple of things , ” Pence said at a meeting of the conservative legal organization Alliance Defending Freedom .
“ Number one is spend more time on your knees than on the internet.
” At the moment , the deck seems stacked against us : worldwide pandemic ; growing numbers of sick @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with fear , ordering its folks to “ shelter in place.
” And let us not forget the inevitable fallout of personal and financial tragedies that await us in the aftermath .
TRENDING : In Priceless Exchange , Trump Tells Press He Should Get Rid of 75 % of Them To Keep Virus From Spreading In the midst of all this chaos , Pence ’ s words are more timely than ever : Trust in a higher power .
As conservative political commentator David French recently wrote , “ The president of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prayer on one of the most fateful days in American ( and world ) history—June 6 , 1944.
” “ If you haven ’ t heard Franklin D. Roosevelt ’ s D-Day prayer , ” French continued , “ I ’ d encourage you to listen .
It captures the terrible gravity and danger of the moment.
” “ The job of a politician , pundit , or activist isn ’ t just to determine what ’ s true , but also what ’ s important.
” Pence and French could not be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are those who recognize innately that they do not know it all .
In times of war , they turn to warriors who have fought it .
In times of illness , they turn to healers who have cured the sick .
Yet in all times , the wisest leaders understand that conflict coexists with the dread of such matters — a fear that can not be resolutely confronted by earthly means , be it knowledge , experience or strength .
It takes courage to recognize that it is humility that moors faith @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because reason is simply not enough .
“ Only so much about life can be understood by reason ; so much falls far short of any reasonable explanation , ” speaker and author Ravi Zacharias once wrote .
RELATED : While Dems Push Coronavirus Panic , Pence Gets Things Done - Announces Free Testing for 240 Million “ Prayer then becomes the irrepressible cry of the heart at the times we most need it.
” Prayer goes a step further than mere good will and practical safety measures to protect us and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of humility , an admission that ultimately , we must place our faith in God .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Seven months ago, Vice President Mike Pence spoke at an event on religious freedom where he was asked for advice about handling political, even personal attacks.
His simple response went viral: Pray more, internet less.
“I would just say maybe a couple of things,” Pence said at a meeting of the conservative legal organization Alliance Defending Freedom. “Number one is spend more time on your knees than on the internet.”
At the moment, the deck seems stacked against us: worldwide pandemic; growing numbers of sick and dying; a nation shut down with fear, ordering its folks to “shelter in place.”
And let us not forget the inevitable fallout of personal and financial tragedies that await us in the aftermath.
In the midst of all this chaos, Pence’s words are more timely than ever: Trust in a higher power.
As conservative political commentator David French recently wrote, “The president of the United States led the American people in prayer on one of the most fateful days in American (and world) history—June 6, 1944.”
“If you haven’t heard Franklin D. Roosevelt’s D-Day prayer,” French continued, “I’d encourage you to listen. It captures the terrible gravity and danger of the moment.”
“The job of a politician, pundit, or activist isn’t just to determine what’s true, but also what’s important.”
Do you think our national leaders should encourage prayer during this crisis? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 99% (893 Votes) No: 1% (6 Votes)
Pence and French could not be more correct. The smartest of leaders are those who recognize innately that they do not know it all.
In times of war, they turn to warriors who have fought it. In times of illness, they turn to healers who have cured the sick.
Yet in all times, the wisest leaders understand that conflict coexists with the dread of such matters — a fear that cannot be resolutely confronted by earthly means, be it knowledge, experience or strength.
It takes courage to recognize that it is humility that moors faith and prayer to the importance of reason because reason is simply not enough.
“Only so much about life can be understood by reason; so much falls far short of any reasonable explanation,” speaker and author Ravi Zacharias once wrote.
“Prayer then becomes the irrepressible cry of the heart at the times we most need it.”
Prayer goes a step further than mere good will and practical safety measures to protect us and the most vulnerable.
Prayer is an act of humility, an admission that ultimately, we must place our faith in God.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-21--National Guard Bureau Chief Issues Warning: Don’t Federalize This Force

National Guard Bureau Chief Gen. Joseph Lengyel cautioned against a federal National Guard activation as the Trump administration considers the move to continue to fight the COVID-19 pandemic .
“ I think you can get everything you need from the National Guard more efficiently and more effectively if you leave them in a state status , ” the Air Force general said at a news conference Thursday , according to Air Force Magazine .
As of Saturday morning , governors across 28 states had mobilized components of the Army and Air National Guard , according to the Military Times .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ not make sense in this situation ” for President Donald Trump to call for federal activation of the National Guard .
Secretary of Defense Mark Esper has not committed to federal activation at this time .
TRENDING : In Priceless Exchange , Trump Tells Press He Should Get Rid of 75 % of Them To Keep Virus From Spreading “ As we get requests in , we will look at activating , if we need to , at the federal level or using the reserves , whatever the case may be , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Military Times reported .
“ We want to be very supportive with regard to our prioritization in terms of supporting the American people and the governors.
” Federal National Guard activation , known as Title 10 , would place guardsmen under the president ’ s control rather than the state governor ’ s , Politico reported .
This would mean the guardsmen could be deployed to another state and that deployment would be funded by the federal government , which would “ cost billions and billions and billions of dollars , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Guard was activated to Title 10 status when guardsmen were used to support military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq , The Atlantic reported .
They were also federally activated in response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005 .
Lengyel said that in the current situation , “ a lot of people won ’ t have things to do ” under Title 10 status .
“ There is no need right now to have 450,000 guardsmen on duty in any given state , ” he said , according to Air Force Magazine .
“ As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to this kind of pandemic , governors have the authority to bring them on active duty , as there are tasks and purpose for them to be used.
” RELATED : As Baltimore Locks Down , Military Vehicles and Troops Appear on City Streets Lengyel emphasized that the control of the National Guard should remain at the state level at this time .
“ The best use of the National Guard is to use the National Guard for the unique authorities that it has , and that is to remain under the command @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states , ” he said .
As of Thursday , every state and territory in the United States had declared a state of emergency , and there were 2,050 National Guard troops on state activation to help combat COVID-19 .
“ Thus far , six members of the National Guard have tested positive for COVID-19 , ” Lengyel added .
“ We have force health-protection measures in place , and will continue to keep our NG members informed as the situation develops.
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

National Guard Bureau Chief Gen. Joseph Lengyel cautioned against a federal National Guard activation as the Trump administration considers the move to continue to fight the COVID-19 pandemic.
“I think you can get everything you need from the National Guard more efficiently and more effectively if you leave them in a state status,” the Air Force general said at a news conference Thursday, according to Air Force Magazine.
As of Saturday morning, governors across 28 states had mobilized components of the Army and Air National Guard, according to the Military Times.
However, Lengyel said it “would not make sense in this situation” for President Donald Trump to call for federal activation of the National Guard.
Secretary of Defense Mark Esper has not committed to federal activation at this time.
“As we get requests in, we will look at activating, if we need to, at the federal level or using the reserves, whatever the case may be,” Esper said at a news conference Tuesday, the Military Times reported.
“We want to be very supportive with regard to our prioritization in terms of supporting the American people and the governors.”
Federal National Guard activation, known as Title 10, would place guardsmen under the president’s control rather than the state governor’s, Politico reported.
This would mean the guardsmen could be deployed to another state and that deployment would be funded by the federal government, which would “cost billions and billions and billions of dollars,” according to Lengyel.
Do you think Trump needs to federally activate the National Guard? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 11% (326 Votes) No: 89% (2722 Votes)
The National Guard was activated to Title 10 status when guardsmen were used to support military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, The Atlantic reported.
They were also federally activated in response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
Lengyel said that in the current situation, “a lot of people won’t have things to do” under Title 10 status.
“There is no need right now to have 450,000 guardsmen on duty in any given state,” he said, according to Air Force Magazine.
“As states need the National Guard to react to this kind of pandemic, governors have the authority to bring them on active duty, as there are tasks and purpose for them to be used.”
Lengyel emphasized that the control of the National Guard should remain at the state level at this time.
“The best use of the National Guard is to use the National Guard for the unique authorities that it has, and that is to remain under the command and control of the networks in the states,” he said.
As of Thursday, every state and territory in the United States had declared a state of emergency, and there were 2,050 National Guard troops on state activation to help combat COVID-19.
“Thus far, six members of the National Guard have tested positive for COVID-19,” Lengyel added. “We have force health-protection measures in place, and will continue to keep our NG members informed as the situation develops.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-21--KrisAnne Hall: Coronavirus or No Coronavirus, Feds Cannot Shut Down Churches

A bloody path was trod to bring religious freedom to modern America .
Christian martyrs and patriots secured our God-given right to freedom of religion with their suffering and even with their lives .
Religious freedom in America is not simply a fundamental right , but a foundational one .
The settlements of the first American colonies were established in the flight from oppressive religious persecution and the struggle continued even on these shores .
From the beating of Obadiah Holmes , the lynching of Quakers and the imprisonment of 50 Baptist preachers who were defended by a fiery attorney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been something American Christians have always been willing to stand for or even to die for .
This history and more gave us our First Amendment to the Constitution and its underlying principle of religious conscience , which has been part of the bedrock of our republic for more than two centuries .
The “ Father of the Constitution ” and fourth President James Madison wrote in 1792 , “ Conscience is the most sacred of all property … the exercise of that , being a natural and unalienable right .
To guard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ castle , to pay public and enforce private debts with the most exact faith , can give no title to invade a man ’ s conscience which is more sacred than his castle.
” Indeed prohibitions upon the government ’ s authority to infringe , limit or dictate the operation of the church had been codified in western law long before the settlement of American colonies .
TRENDING : In Priceless Exchange , Trump Tells Press He Should Get Rid of 75 % of Them To Keep Virus From Spreading Many American Christians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ famous letter to the Danbury Baptists ensuring them that America would never return to a time where the government sought to dictate the operations of the church .
But long before 1802 , Jefferson ’ s “ wall of separation of church and state ” that kept government outside the sacred walls of the church was one alluded to by King Henry I in the 1100 Charter of Liberties .
Henry declared the body of the church to be free from government intrusions .
Two centuries later , one of the tipping points @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Carta was the crown ’ s attempt to interfere in the free operation of the church .
This charter history of our founding documents continued its development through the Grand Remonstrance of 1641 and the English Bill of Rights of 1689 under which our founders arrived in this New World .
Each of these installments , which would later culminate in our founding documents ; all happened amid the fight for religious liberty .
However , even with the clear language of our First Amendment and the history that should inform our actions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right from the control of government continues to this day .
Modern lawmakers like to carve out excuses and causes for government intrusions into our inherent rights when some imagined need arises .
William Pitt , The Younger , warned in 1783 , “ Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom .
It is the argument of tyrants .
It is the creed of slaves.
” Necessity seems to always be the most powerful tool to persuade the masses into accepting these infringements .
Today , because of the coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ huge “ necessity plea ” in the form of limits upon assembly .
At least one church has been descended upon by police and threatened with the National Guard for having more than 250 people attend .
According to the courts , a law that infringes upon a fundamental right like freedom of religion must overcome certain challenges : The law must not be arbitrary , oppressive , or unreasonable .
The law must be equally applied to secular businesses and it must satisfy a qualification of being the least restrictive means necessary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The restrictions imposed by governors and municipalities upon the number of people who can assemble in a private church gathering appears to fail these tests .
First , these numerical restrictions are completely arbitrary in nature .
There has been no tested nor proven scientific or medical data to show us what “ number ” of people that congregate together are a danger to society .
The number has varied from place to place and moment by moment .
Somewhere it ’ s 50 , other places its 10 and there are still @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trust Trump To Defend Faith and Religious Liberty When politicians assign an “ acceptable ” number of people allowed in a private church , they are reducing our right to freedom of religion to a first come , first served privilege .
Our first foundational document reads : “ We hold these truths to be self-evident , that all men are created equal , that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.
” The government deciding who can attend a service by way of a numerical limit does not demonstrate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be seen as a per se violation of the principle of separation of church and state .
Secondly , these laws are not being applied equally upon secular businesses and other institutions .
When arbitrary number limits are applied to a church and not to a library , post office , grocery store or hotel gym , there is not equal application .
These laws try to justify unequal application based upon the definition of essential services .
By what authority does the government declare the church nonessential ?
The Church is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for comfort in a climate of fear and uncertainty .
In a time of crisis , people are fearful and in need of comfort and community , more than ever before .
Even people who do not attend church regularly , or perhaps never go to church , need to know that there is somewhere for them to go when they need help .
Throughout history , the church has been viewed as an essential part of society , a refuge in time of trouble or need , a place of peace and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a place of healing and provision .
More salient for believers is that the Bible pointedly addresses the issue of assembling during troubled times : “ not neglecting to meet together , as is the habit of some , but encouraging one another , and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.
” ( Heb .
10:25 , ESV ) Many in the church take this as a solemn command .
To deny a Christian his obligation to gather with his local body is to put him at odds with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ For a believer in Christ there are few things as essential as the gathering of the body of Christ in the study of God ’ s Word and worship of His Glory .
As a matter of fact , the Bible teaches that since we are eternal beings in this temporary world , God ’ s word is more essential than food : “ But he answered , ‘ It is written , “ Man shall not live by bread alone , but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ESV ) When those in government can assign a label of nonessential to the practice of religion , then government is taking a very serious and dangerous role of defining religion , which is expressly forbidden in our Bill of Rights and in a majority of our state constitutions .
Finally , these restrictions are not reasonable and not the least restrictive means necessary .
The case law used to define reasonableness in these laws are easily distinguishable .
In Moore v. Draper , the court held that Moore could be quarantined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had Tuberculosis .
The court also said that once he was healthy he could no longer be reasonably or legally quarantined and prevented from attending church .
The current laws restricting the number of attendees of a church are not restrictions on one unhealthy individual .
They are restrictions upon a group of healthy people , which the court said would be unreasonable .
Additionally , the court did not order the entire church to be shut down to keep Moore healthy , which is exactly what these laws are trying to suggest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Limiting an entire congregation of people for the safety of those who may be at risk of infection does not meet the standard of Moore , nor can it be seen as the least restrictive means necessary .
The case of Varholy v. Sweat can be distinguishable for the same reasons as Moore .
Finally , in Employment Division vs. Smith , the court held that the outlawed use of peyote is not an unreasonable interference upon freedom of religion as it was a “ neutral , generally applicable law.
” Because the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ generally applicable to every place where people will congregate , this case is not controlling .
Although it is argued the “ protection of the public health is one of the prime duties resting upon the State ” we can not escape the reality that the first prime duty of every state is codified in the Declaration of Independence : “ … that among these are Life , Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness .
— That to secure these rights , Governments are instituted among Men , deriving their just powers from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is nothing in the law or precedent to establish a blanket and arbitrary assertion of “ state of emergency ” as an unquestionable authority .
There is also nothing in the law or precedent to support a restriction on the number of people who can assemble in a church , for health reasons or otherwise , as a criterion for denying the essential right of freedom of religion .
There is , however , everything in history and experience that says such actions by government are unreasonable and oppressive restrictions upon the essential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Rev .
Jonathan Witherspoon , founder of Princeton University gave this warning : “ There is not a single instance in history in which civil liberty was lost , and religious liberty preserved entire.
” Indeed , when Peter and the apostles were told by law not to gather , preach or lay hands on the sick for God to grant them healing on threat of prison , they chose to continue to practice their faith .
After they escaped from prison and were told by God to go back and assemble @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they did exactly that .
And when they were questioned by the government as to why they continued to break this law , the apostles did not hesitate or make excuse , they simply said , “ We must obey God rather than men.
” ( Acts 5:29 , ESV ) True to the history that makes America great , our pastors and church members should not so easily surrender a fundamental rights so faithfully contended for by those who have gone before .
Who will stand and not let the landmarks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

A bloody path was trod to bring religious freedom to modern America. Christian martyrs and patriots secured our God-given right to freedom of religion with their suffering and even with their lives.
Religious freedom in America is not simply a fundamental right, but a foundational one. The settlements of the first American colonies were established in the flight from oppressive religious persecution and the struggle continued even on these shores. From the beating of Obadiah Holmes, the lynching of Quakers and the imprisonment of 50 Baptist preachers who were defended by a fiery attorney named Patrick Henry, religious liberty has been something American Christians have always been willing to stand for or even to die for.
This history and more gave us our First Amendment to the Constitution and its underlying principle of religious conscience, which has been part of the bedrock of our republic for more than two centuries.
The “Father of the Constitution” and fourth President James Madison wrote in 1792, “Conscience is the most sacred of all property … the exercise of that, being a natural and unalienable right. To guard a man’s house as his castle, to pay public and enforce private debts with the most exact faith, can give no title to invade a man’s conscience which is more sacred than his castle.”
Indeed prohibitions upon the government’s authority to infringe, limit or dictate the operation of the church had been codified in western law long before the settlement of American colonies.
Many American Christians have heard of Thomas Jefferson’s famous letter to the Danbury Baptists ensuring them that America would never return to a time where the government sought to dictate the operations of the church. But long before 1802, Jefferson’s “wall of separation of church and state” that kept government outside the sacred walls of the church was one alluded to by King Henry I in the 1100 Charter of Liberties.
Henry declared the body of the church to be free from government intrusions. Two centuries later, one of the tipping points in the fight that brought us Magna Carta was the crown’s attempt to interfere in the free operation of the church. This charter history of our founding documents continued its development through the Grand Remonstrance of 1641 and the English Bill of Rights of 1689 under which our founders arrived in this New World.
Each of these installments, which would later culminate in our founding documents; all happened amid the fight for religious liberty.
However, even with the clear language of our First Amendment and the history that should inform our actions, the struggle to maintain this essential right from the control of government continues to this day. Modern lawmakers like to carve out excuses and causes for government intrusions into our inherent rights when some imagined need arises.
Do you believe the federal government has the authority to shut down places of worship? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 13% (22 Votes) No: 87% (148 Votes)
William Pitt, The Younger, warned in 1783, “Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves.”
Necessity seems to always be the most powerful tool to persuade the masses into accepting these infringements. Today, because of the coronavirus scare, religious liberty is facing a huge “necessity plea” in the form of limits upon assembly. At least one church has been descended upon by police and threatened with the National Guard for having more than 250 people attend.
According to the courts, a law that infringes upon a fundamental right like freedom of religion must overcome certain challenges: The law must not be arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable. The law must be equally applied to secular businesses and it must satisfy a qualification of being the least restrictive means necessary to accomplish a compelling governmental interest.
The restrictions imposed by governors and municipalities upon the number of people who can assemble in a private church gathering appears to fail these tests.
First, these numerical restrictions are completely arbitrary in nature. There has been no tested nor proven scientific or medical data to show us what “number” of people that congregate together are a danger to society. The number has varied from place to place and moment by moment. Somewhere it’s 50, other places its 10 and there are still other variations.
When politicians assign an “acceptable” number of people allowed in a private church, they are reducing our right to freedom of religion to a first come, first served privilege. Our first foundational document reads: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.” The government deciding who can attend a service by way of a numerical limit does not demonstrate an equality of rights and ought to be seen as a per se violation of the principle of separation of church and state.
Secondly, these laws are not being applied equally upon secular businesses and other institutions. When arbitrary number limits are applied to a church and not to a library, post office, grocery store or hotel gym, there is not equal application.
These laws try to justify unequal application based upon the definition of essential services. By what authority does the government declare the church nonessential? The Church is a place where people turn for help and for comfort in a climate of fear and uncertainty. In a time of crisis, people are fearful and in need of comfort and community, more than ever before. Even people who do not attend church regularly, or perhaps never go to church, need to know that there is somewhere for them to go when they need help.
Throughout history, the church has been viewed as an essential part of society, a refuge in time of trouble or need, a place of peace and a sanctuary for the weary, even a place of healing and provision. More salient for believers is that the Bible pointedly addresses the issue of assembling during troubled times: “not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.” (Heb. 10:25, ESV) Many in the church take this as a solemn command.
To deny a Christian his obligation to gather with his local body is to put him at odds with a fundamental tenet of the faith. For a believer in Christ there are few things as essential as the gathering of the body of Christ in the study of God’s Word and worship of His Glory. As a matter of fact, the Bible teaches that since we are eternal beings in this temporary world, God’s word is more essential than food: “But he answered, ‘It is written, “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.”‘” (Mt. 4:4, ESV)
When those in government can assign a label of nonessential to the practice of religion, then government is taking a very serious and dangerous role of defining religion, which is expressly forbidden in our Bill of Rights and in a majority of our state constitutions.
Finally, these restrictions are not reasonable and not the least restrictive means necessary. The case law used to define reasonableness in these laws are easily distinguishable. In Moore v. Draper, the court held that Moore could be quarantined and prevented from attending church because he had Tuberculosis. The court also said that once he was healthy he could no longer be reasonably or legally
quarantined and prevented from attending church.
The current laws restricting the number of attendees of a church are not restrictions on one unhealthy individual. They are restrictions upon a group of healthy people, which the court said would be unreasonable.
Additionally, the court did not order the entire church to be shut down to keep Moore healthy, which is exactly what these laws are trying to suggest is a reasonable and constitutional solution.
Limiting an entire congregation of people for the safety of those who may be at risk of infection does not meet the standard of Moore, nor can it be seen as the least restrictive means necessary. The case of Varholy v. Sweat can be distinguishable for the same reasons as Moore.
Finally, in Employment Division vs. Smith, the court held that the outlawed use of peyote is not an unreasonable interference upon freedom of religion as it was a “neutral, generally applicable law.” Because the current restrictions upon church assemblies are not generally applicable to every place where people will congregate, this case is not controlling.
Although it is argued the “protection of the public health is one of the prime duties resting upon the State” we cannot escape the reality that the first prime duty of every state is codified in the Declaration of Independence: “… that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
There is nothing in the law or precedent to establish a blanket and arbitrary assertion of “state of emergency” as an unquestionable authority.
There is also nothing in the law or precedent to support a restriction on the number of people who can assemble in a church, for health reasons or otherwise, as a criterion for denying the essential right of freedom of religion.
There is, however, everything in history and experience that says such actions by government are unreasonable and oppressive restrictions upon the essential and inherent right of freedom of religion.
Rev. John Witherspoon, the only active clergyman to sign the Declaration of Independence, gave this warning: “There is not a single instance in history in which civil liberty was lost, and religious liberty preserved entire.”
Indeed, when Peter and the apostles were told by law not to gather, preach or lay hands on the sick for God to grant them healing on threat of prison, they chose to continue to practice their faith. After they escaped from prison and were told by God to go back and assemble with the people and preach and heal, they did exactly that.
And when they were questioned by the government as to why they continued to break this law, the apostles did not hesitate or make excuse, they simply said, “We must obey God rather than men.” (Acts 5:29, ESV)
True to the history that makes America great, our pastors and church members should not so easily surrender a fundamental rights so faithfully contended for by those who have gone before.
Who will stand and not let the landmarks be moved?
CORRECTION, Mar. 24, 2020: This Op-Ed originally identified “Rev. Jonathan Witherspoon” as the founder of Princeton University. Witherspoon’s first name was John, and he was the sixth president of the College of New Jersey in Princeton, which later became known as Princeton University. We have corrected Witherspoon’s first name and removed the reference to Princeton altogether, instead identifying him as a signer of the Declaration of Independence.
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-21--As Baltimore Locks Down, Military Vehicles and Troops Appear on City Streets

The Maryland National Guard has been deployed to the city of Baltimore in preparation to assist local authorities with humanitarian aid , as city leaders express frustration that citizens are refusing to follow orders to prevent the spread of the coronavirus .
City leaders told The Baltimore Sun on Friday that many citizens and businesses in the community have defied mandates by state and local officials prohibiting all social gatherings .
While citizens have yet to receive a “ shelter-in-place ” order , the city is quickly locking down , and a ban on all nonessential travel might not be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and shortsighted to see some disregarding the safety of their neighbors and risking the spread of COVID-19 for the purpose of socializing , ” Baltimore Police Chief Melissa Hyatt said in a statement .
“ We have a duty to enforce the law within the authority that we are granted for the community to understand the magnitude of this pandemic , ” Hyatt added .
TRENDING : CNN & MSNBC Commentator Literally Calls for Melania To Be Infected with Coronavirus Maryland Gov .
Larry Hogan has prohibited social gatherings of more than 10 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to close , as The Sun reported .
Yet many individuals and businesses in the city , despite warnings about the potential public health threat posed by the coronavirus , have defied the order to self-isolate .
“ These are not recommendations ; these are lifesaving measures that we will enforce , ” Baltimore County Executive Johnny Olszewski Jr. said in a statement .
“ These measures are necessary because we continue to see selfish and reckless behavior that jeopardizes the health and well-being of our loved ones , friends and neighbors , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vickie Warehime , meanwhile , told The Sun the department “ has been responding to reports of large social gatherings , mostly of teenagers , but also had to shut down some smaller gyms that remained open despite Hogan ’ s order.
” “ If you do violate the governor ’ s orders , we ’ re ready to take action , ” Warehime told the newspaper .
The presence of military vehicles in the streets of the city was reported Friday on Twitter and later by local media .
RELATED : Former @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Federal Prison for Children 's Book Scheme The Maryland National Guard attempted to quell rumors of a coming declaration of martial law .
“ To our neighbors , there is not a threat of martial law , ” the guard ’ s verified Twitter account posted .
“ If you see a @ MDNG Humvee on your street , know we are helping someone in need !
Whether it ’ s delivering much needed supplies or setting up tents for health screening stations , we are working for you !
” WBFF reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and its members are ready to carry out humanitarian missions .
“ The Guard ’ s deployment helps provide resources we need to support the work being done to keep Baltimore healthy , ” Baltimore Mayor Jack Young said in a statement .
“ I am confident that the deployment of the National Guard will help ensure Baltimore City has everything it needs to fully address COVID-19 .
I would like to thank Governor Hogan for working closely with , ” Young added .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ standards .

The Maryland National Guard has been deployed to the city of Baltimore in preparation to assist local authorities with humanitarian aid, as city leaders express frustration that citizens are refusing to follow orders to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
City leaders told The Baltimore Sun on Friday that many citizens and businesses in the community have defied mandates by state and local officials prohibiting all social gatherings.
While citizens have yet to receive a “shelter-in-place” order, the city is quickly locking down, and a ban on all nonessential travel might not be far off.
“It is frustrating and shortsighted to see some disregarding the safety of their neighbors and risking the spread of COVID-19 for the purpose of socializing,” Baltimore Police Chief Melissa Hyatt said in a statement.
“We have a duty to enforce the law within the authority that we are granted for the community to understand the magnitude of this pandemic,” Hyatt added.
Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan has prohibited social gatherings of more than 10 people and also ordered many nonessential businesses to close, as The Sun reported.
Yet many individuals and businesses in the city, despite warnings about the potential public health threat posed by the coronavirus, have defied the order to self-isolate.
“These are not recommendations; these are lifesaving measures that we will enforce,” Baltimore County Executive Johnny Olszewski Jr. said in a statement.
“These measures are necessary because we continue to see selfish and reckless behavior that jeopardizes the health and well-being of our loved ones, friends and neighbors,” Olszewski added.
Do you think the country's health crisis justifies the presence of the National Guard in American cities? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 53% (1980 Votes) No: 47% (1736 Votes)
Baltimore police spokeswoman Vickie Warehime, meanwhile, told The Sun the department “has been responding to reports of large social gatherings, mostly of teenagers, but also had to shut down some smaller gyms that remained open despite Hogan’s order.”
“If you do violate the governor’s orders, we’re ready to take action,” Warehime told the newspaper.
The presence of military vehicles in the streets of the city was reported Friday on Twitter and later by local media.
Military vehicles spotted in downtown Baltimore, near the stadiums… pic.twitter.com/YDwCUKJ51p — FOX Baltimore (@FOXBaltimore) March 20, 2020
The Maryland National Guard attempted to quell rumors of a coming declaration of martial law.
“To our neighbors, there is not a threat of martial law,” the guard’s verified Twitter account posted.
“If you see a @MDNG Humvee on your street, know we are helping someone in need! Whether it’s delivering much needed supplies or setting up tents for health screening stations, we are working for you!”
To our neighbors, there is not a threat of martial law. If you see a @MDNG Humvee on your street, know we are helping someone in need! Whether it’s delivering much needed supplies or setting up tents for health screening stations, we are working for you!https://t.co/CoD3ycAQ39 — MD National Guard (@MDNG) March 20, 2020
WBFF reported the guard is staging as a precaution and its members are ready to carry out humanitarian missions.
“The Guard’s deployment helps provide resources we need to support the work being done to keep Baltimore healthy,” Baltimore Mayor Jack Young said in a statement.
“I am confident that the deployment of the National Guard will help ensure Baltimore City has everything it needs to fully address COVID-19. I would like to thank Governor Hogan for working closely with,” Young added.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-21--In Stroke of Genius, Doctor Turns 1 Ventilator into 4

Doctors fighting the COVID-19 outbreak are finding new ways to combat a possible ventilator shortage by turning one ventilator into four .
Based on her study conducted in 2006 , Dr. Charlene Babcock , who practices in the Detroit area , demonstrated how one ventilator could be easily modified to provide ventilation for four adults .
“ Because of the COVID-19 pandemic , many health care providers are struggling with a situation where they may have more than one patient needing ventilation and not enough ventilators to go around , ” Babcock explained in her instructional video .
Using human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study that one ventilator could successfully provide equal ventilation to four adults at the same time .
TRENDING : CNN & MSNBC Commentator Literally Calls for Melania To Be Infected with Coronavirus Babcock said that while this has only been tried on test lungs thus far , the information could be used in an emergency situation .
“ First of all , you want to make sure the lung sizes are the same in all four portions of the cycle or the circuit , ” she said .
“ We wouldn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an adult patient , because that wouldn ’ t make sense.
” Doctors using this method would also need to make sure the resistance is the same , so putting a patient who has severe bronchospasm with one who does not would also not work .
Babcock also suggested using a “ half-star configuration ” with the ventilator in the middle and the hospital beds on the outside so the same length tubing could reach each patient .
In her video , she added that while this exact method hasn ’ t been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used following the 2017 Las Vegas shooting when the practicing physician ran out of ventilators .
Dr. Kevin Menes had trained with the co-author of Babcock ’ s study , Greg Neyman , and used one ventilator to supply air for two patients .
“ It was very successful , ” she said .
“ He was able to keep them alive for hours as they waited for outside ventilator support to come in and help them supply the patient need.
” Babcock cautioned physicians that the study did not look into possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but the risk is somewhat mitigated if the ventilators are being used on only COVID-19 patients .
“ Now here ’ s my disclaimer : This is off label use of the ventilator , ” she said .
“ The ventilator is made for one person , and I ’ m using it here in a simulation of four patients.
” “ I always hope that you would never need to use it in this way , but you can never predict what is going to happen in a disaster , ” she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Doctors fighting the COVID-19 outbreak are finding new ways to combat a possible ventilator shortage by turning one ventilator into four.
Based on her study conducted in 2006, Dr. Charlene Babcock, who practices in the Detroit area, demonstrated how one ventilator could be easily modified to provide ventilation for four adults.
“Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, many health care providers are struggling with a situation where they may have more than one patient needing ventilation and not enough ventilators to go around,” Babcock explained in her instructional video.
Using human lung simulators, she found in her study that one ventilator could successfully provide equal ventilation to four adults at the same time.
Babcock said that while this has only been tried on test lungs thus far, the information could be used in an emergency situation.
“First of all, you want to make sure the lung sizes are the same in all four portions of the cycle or the circuit,” she said.
Are you glad doctors are being innovative in case of emergency? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 100% (543 Votes) No: 0% (0 Votes)
“We wouldn’t want to put a pediatric patient with an adult patient, because that wouldn’t make sense.”
Doctors using this method would also need to make sure the resistance is the same, so putting a patient who has severe bronchospasm with one who does not would also not work.
This video explains how to modify an existing ventilator to ventilate several patients from the same machine. In the face of a shortage of life saving equipment, this modification is critical.#VentilatorShortage #Medical #CoronavirusUSA #COVIDー19 pic.twitter.com/gPbHVIaQIE https://t.co/Cllg1UvyJ5 — Colleen Fellows (@ColleenFellows) March 21, 2020
Babcock also suggested using a “half-star configuration” with the ventilator in the middle and the hospital beds on the outside so the same length tubing could reach each patient.
In her video, she added that while this exact method hasn’t been studied on humans, it had been used following the 2017 Las Vegas shooting when the practicing physician ran out of ventilators.
Dr. Kevin Menes had trained with the co-author of Babcock’s study, Greg Neyman, and used one ventilator to supply air for two patients.
“It was very successful,” she said. “He was able to keep them alive for hours as they waited for outside ventilator support to come in and help them supply the patient need.”
Babcock cautioned physicians that the study did not look into possible cross-contamination risks in the one-way circuit, but the risk is somewhat mitigated if the ventilators are being used on only COVID-19 patients.
“Now here’s my disclaimer: This is off label use of the ventilator,” she said. “The ventilator is made for one person, and I’m using it here in a simulation of four patients.”
“I always hope that you would never need to use it in this way, but you can never predict what is going to happen in a disaster,” she added.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-21--Normally Reserved Brit Hume Curses at David French Over Uncalled for Attack on Trump

Wanting to apologize for NeverTrumpers is like apologizing for some of your more wayward friends after college .
Seriously !
They ’ re going to get their stuff together .
OK , really , more than their stuff .
OK , so it ’ s their crap , but like , they ’ re really going to get it together this time .
Look , look , don ’ t say that s-word .
They ’ re going to do it , really .
They ’ re doing their own thing .
Don ’ t judge , all right ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the fact that they disagree with me .
I ’ m originally from New York City and I don ’ t spend most of my time in Bible study .
This means before I was quarantined , I spent time with liberals in their natural habitat .
It instead has to deal with the fact with the fact that so many RINOS are … well , like David French .
David French is legitimately the kind of NeverTrumper you want to like .
He ’ s not a bad guy — really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : In Priceless Exchange , Trump Tells Press He Should Get Rid of 75 % of Them To Keep Virus From Spreading He ’ s got the pedigree — law degree , National Review , a lo-fi podcast with his wife that you don ’ t mind listening to .
He ’ s even got that cutesy quote from Rush Limbaugh on his Twitter profile to remind you that he doesn ’ t take his position as a professional Trump-hater all that seriously !
( El Rushbo apparently called him a “ real @ @ @ @ @ @ @ life-changer for a man with 204,000 Twitter followers . )
And yet , he ’ s the kind of guy where you can understand why Brit Hume decided to curse at him — blanked-out curses though they may be have been .
So , here ’ s what French was commenting on — a furrowed-brow question from NBC News ’ Peter Alexander on Friday , purportedly about people who are concerned in the midst of the coronavirus epidemic .
This made Peter Alexander mildly famous .
See also : “ Peter Alexander : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Called ‘ Terrible ’ For Asking To Send Hopeful Message ” from Bonnie Fuller ’ s HollywoodLife.com .
( Not just any HollywoodLife.com… ! )
The subtext of the question , in case you didn ’ t get it , was that Trump couldn ’ t rise to the occasion .
I know this because a ) Peter Alexander is the kind of man who knew what the lowest common denominator was before he asked the question and b ) that wondrous , ad-festooned excavator of the lowest common denominator , Bonnie Fuller @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Instead of using the opportunity to rise to the occasion to deliver a Presidential message of reassurance and hope to the American people , Trump lashed out viciously at ” Peter Alexander .
French had the same thoughts about the question that HollywoodLife.com had ( yes , none other than Bonnie Fuller ’ s HollywoodLife.com ! )
: So anyway , Brit Hume said a somewhat more expletive-strewn version of what I was thinking , but it ’ ll do : RELATED : In Remarkably Open Interview , Brit Hume Says Biden Getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This Myself' More or less .
So the only way Peter Alexander ’ s question could have been more obnoxiously laden with Beltway-insider subtext was if he was holding an Apple Pencil while he intoned it .
And not the old-fangled Apple Pencil but the new one that adds more usefulness but mostly allows you to say that you have the new Apple Pencil and not the old one .
Oh , and it also only works with the iPad Pro .
Peter Alexander didn ’ t ask this because he wanted an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wanted a confrontation .
I don ’ t know whether President Trump should give a great “ there ’ s nothing to fear but fear itself ” speech as his reply .
I say that because , in a world where FDR never gave the “ there ’ s nothing to fear but fear itself ” speech , Donald Trump could give that — and also , the “ blood , sweat and tears ” speech and the “ I have a dream ” speech , all the while doing a version of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” with Dr. Anthony Fauci — and it wouldn ’ t matter .
He wouldn ’ t have moved America ’ s heart and tickled our funny bones enough for it to matter .
For that matter , this was a stupid question .
Rookie “ Superman ” writers would have shot this down as a query that a flustered Jimmy Olsen would have asked Lex Luthor at a news conference at Metropolis City Hall .
What would you tell Americans who are afraid because they ’ re fearful because this virus is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Any answer , President Luthor ?
I ’ m here with my Apple Pencil waiting for you to respond , sir .
Even if both Trump and Luthor dealt with the question equally as well with the question as they dealt with the loss of their hair , Alexander ’ s query wasn ’ t anything more than a useless inquiry by a man who thought it sounded way better in his head than it did coming out of his mouth .
Brit Hume is normally reserved .
Perhaps he doesn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this way .
It certainly beats the way David French dealt with it , however .
You don ’ t like the response ?
Fair enough .
“ Legitimate question ” isn ’ t just stretching it , it ’ s ignoring a subtext completely .
And that ’ s the thing : No matter how “ text ” the “ subtext ” was , David French would have still ignored it .
Peter Alexander : “ What do you say to Americans , right now , who think you ’ re directly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ David A. French : “ This was a legitimate question , the response is inexcusable .
Trump ’ s change in tone didn ’ t last long.
” Bonnie Fuller ’ s ThousandsOfHollywoodDeaths.com : “ 10 Things You Need to Know About How Donald Trump Caused < insert minor celebrity here > ‘ s Death.
” Really , David French isn ’ t that bad !
I swear .
He ’ s at least as good as , um , Bonnie Fuller .
Whoever she is .
We are committed to truth and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Read our editorial standards .

Wanting to apologize for NeverTrumpers is like apologizing for some of your more wayward friends after college.
Seriously! They’re going to get their stuff together. OK, really, more than their stuff. OK, so it’s their crap, but like, they’re really going to get it together this time. Look, look, don’t say that s-word. They’re going to do it, really. They’re doing their own thing. Don’t judge, all right?
It doesn’t have to do with the fact that they disagree with me. I’m originally from New York City and I don’t spend most of my time in Bible study. This means before I was quarantined, I spent time with liberals in their natural habitat.
It instead has to deal with the fact with the fact that so many RINOS are … well, like David French.
David French is legitimately the kind of NeverTrumper you want to like. He’s not a bad guy — really, he’s not!
He’s got the pedigree — law degree, National Review, a lo-fi podcast with his wife that you don’t mind listening to. He’s even got that cutesy quote from Rush Limbaugh on his Twitter profile to remind you that he doesn’t take his position as a professional Trump-hater all that seriously! (El Rushbo apparently called him a “real problem,” which was apparently a life-changer for a man with 204,000 Twitter followers.)
And yet, he’s the kind of guy where you can understand why Brit Hume decided to curse at him — blanked-out curses though they may be have been.
So, here’s what French was commenting on — a furrowed-brow question from NBC News’ Peter Alexander on Friday, purportedly about people who are concerned in the midst of the coronavirus epidemic.
This made Peter Alexander mildly famous. See also: “Peter Alexander: 5 Things To Know About Reporter Trump Called ‘Terrible’ For Asking To Send Hopeful Message” from Bonnie Fuller’s HollywoodLife.com. (Not just any HollywoodLife.com… !)
The subtext of the question, in case you didn’t get it, was that Trump couldn’t rise to the occasion. I know this because a) Peter Alexander is the kind of man who knew what the lowest common denominator was before he asked the question and b) that wondrous, ad-festooned excavator of the lowest common denominator, Bonnie Fuller’s HollywoodLife.com, said, “Instead of using the opportunity to rise to the occasion to deliver a Presidential message of reassurance and hope to the American people, Trump lashed out viciously at” Peter Alexander.
French had the same thoughts about the question that HollywoodLife.com had (yes, none other than Bonnie Fuller’s HollywoodLife.com!):
This was a legitimate question, the response is inexcusable. Trump’s change in tone didn’t last long. https://t.co/5M3L9PKVpJ — David French (@DavidAFrench) March 20, 2020
So anyway, Brit Hume said a somewhat more expletive-strewn version of what I was thinking, but it’ll do:
Legitimate question my a**. It was the kind of bullsh*t gotcha question which hack WH reporters have been asking for decades. But instead of going off on the reporter, Trump should have said the whole briefing in all its particulars was a message to people who are scared. https://t.co/Qg0lYC1fxk — Brit Hume (@brithume) March 20, 2020
More or less.
So the only way Peter Alexander’s question could have been more obnoxiously laden with Beltway-insider subtext was if he was holding an Apple Pencil while he intoned it. And not the old-fangled Apple Pencil but the new one that adds more usefulness but mostly allows you to say that you have the new Apple Pencil and not the old one. Oh, and it also only works with the iPad Pro.
Peter Alexander didn’t ask this because he wanted an answer. He asked this because he wanted a confrontation.
I don’t know whether President Trump should give a great “there’s nothing to fear but fear itself” speech as his reply. I say that because, in a world where FDR never gave the “there’s nothing to fear but fear itself” speech, Donald Trump could give that — and also, the “blood, sweat and tears” speech and the “I have a dream” speech, all the while doing a version of “Who’s on First?” with Dr. Anthony Fauci — and it wouldn’t matter.
He wouldn’t have moved America’s heart and tickled our funny bones enough for it to matter.
Do you think Brit Hume's attack was called for? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 94% (3347 Votes) No: 6% (212 Votes)
For that matter, this was a stupid question. Rookie “Superman” writers would have shot this down as a query that a flustered Jimmy Olsen would have asked Lex Luthor at a news conference at Metropolis City Hall. What would you tell Americans who are afraid because they’re fearful because this virus is fearsome and your leadership is scary? Any answer, President Luthor? I’m here with my Apple Pencil waiting for you to respond, sir.
Even if both Trump and Luthor dealt with the question equally as well with the question as they dealt with the loss of their hair, Alexander’s query wasn’t anything more than a useless inquiry by a man who thought it sounded way better in his head than it did coming out of his mouth.
Brit Hume is normally reserved. Perhaps he doesn’t deserve plaudits for dealing with the question this way.
It certainly beats the way David French dealt with it, however.
You don’t like the response? Fair enough. “Legitimate question” isn’t just stretching it, it’s ignoring a subtext completely.
And that’s the thing: No matter how “text” the “subtext” was, David French would have still ignored it.
Peter Alexander: “What do you say to Americans, right now, who think you’re directly responsible for thousands of deaths?”
Donald Trump: “That’s a nasty question.”
David A. French: “This was a legitimate question, the response is inexcusable. Trump’s change in tone didn’t last long.”
Bonnie Fuller’s ThousandsOfHollywoodDeaths.com: “10 Things You Need to Know About How Donald Trump Caused ‘s Death.”
Really, David French isn’t that bad! I swear. He’s at least as good as, um, Bonnie Fuller.
Whoever she is.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-21--Police Break Up 2 Large Weddings for Violating Coronavirus ‘Less Than 50’ Guideline

As the number of confirmed coronavirus cases in the U.S. continues to swell , lawmakers and public officials are taking more drastic action and enforcing restrictions on how many people are allowed to gather together at one time .
On Monday , Democratic New Jersey Gov .
Phil Murphy announced a ban on gatherings of 50 people or more , and requested that the people of New Jersey take social distancing seriously .
But two wedding parties in Lakewood , New Jersey , apparently didn ’ t get the memo .
Police were sent to break up not one , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the day after the new restrictions took effect , according to NJ.com .
“ We stress that the public do their part in reducing the spread of COVID-19 by obeying the guidelines set forth by the State of New Jersey and encourage cleaning your hands often , staying home if your sick , covering coughs and sneezes , consider wearing a face mask if you aren ’ t feeling well , clean and disinfect frequently touched surfaces and practice social distancing , ” Lakewood Police Department Capt .
Gregory Staffordsmith told NJ.com .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tells Press He Should Get Rid of 75 % of Them To Keep Virus From Spreading Police informed both venues ’ staff members that gatherings of 50 people or greater were prohibited by the governor , and everybody in attendance vacated the area .
Lakewood Township Mayor Raymond Coles said the two venues where the weddings took place were unaware that Murphy ’ s ban had already gone into effect .
But law enforcement officials in the area say they are concerned that such occurrences are indicators of how difficult it may be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic seriously .
Coles told NJ.com that the township attorney will be looking into whether the government can fine or otherwise penalize people who continue to gather in large groups .
He added that he understands how tough it must be to cancel a wedding after months of planning and preparation .
“ You ’ d hope you wouldn ’ t have to [ enact penalties ] with everything going on in the news , ” Coles said .
“ But if we stop this thing from spreading now , then we can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” “ We need to respect the restrictions , ” he said .
“ I take personal responsibility for the public health and safety of New Jersey , ” he tweeted Wednesday .
“ If you are unhappy about our aggressive social distancing measures , I ’ m sorry .
But your safety is my highest priority.
” As of Saturday morning , there were 890 confirmed cases of the the coronavirus in the state , and 11 deaths , according to Johns Hopkins University .
Murphy said Friday that the number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus tests become more available .
“ We ’ ve received 155 new positive test results since yesterday , bringing our statewide total to 890 , ” Murphy wrote .
“ To be clear : the number of positive tests is rising , in part , because of expanding capabilities from private labs .
“ We expected these numbers , and we expect them to keep rising , in the short-term , as greater testing capabilities come online.
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read @ @ @ @

As the number of confirmed coronavirus cases in the U.S. continues to swell, lawmakers and public officials are taking more drastic action and enforcing restrictions on how many people are allowed to gather together at one time.
On Monday, Democratic New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy announced a ban on gatherings of 50 people or more, and requested that the people of New Jersey take social distancing seriously.
But two wedding parties in Lakewood, New Jersey, apparently didn’t get the memo.
Police were sent to break up not one, but two different weddings on Tuesday, the day after the new restrictions took effect, according to NJ.com.
“We stress that the public do their part in reducing the spread of COVID-19 by obeying the guidelines set forth by the State of New Jersey and encourage cleaning your hands often, staying home if your sick, covering coughs and sneezes, consider wearing a face mask if you aren’t feeling well, clean and disinfect frequently touched surfaces and practice social distancing,” Lakewood Police Department Capt. Gregory Staffordsmith told NJ.com.
Police informed both venues’ staff members that gatherings of 50 people or greater were prohibited by the governor, and everybody in attendance vacated the area.
Lakewood Township Mayor Raymond Coles said the two venues where the weddings took place were unaware that Murphy’s ban had already gone into effect.
Earlier tonight at Fountain Ballroom in Lakewood, NJ Two weddings taking place with hundreds of people. So much for social distancing. pic.twitter.com/aUVFTiBj77 — ernie rokose (@ernierokose) March 18, 2020
Do you think bans on large gatherings are an overreaction? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 27% (148 Votes) No: 73% (402 Votes)
But law enforcement officials in the area say they are concerned that such occurrences are indicators of how difficult it may be to convince people to take the coronavirus pandemic seriously.
Coles told NJ.com that the township attorney will be looking into whether the government can fine or otherwise penalize people who continue to gather in large groups.
He added that he understands how tough it must be to cancel a wedding after months of planning and preparation.
“You’d hope you wouldn’t have to [enact penalties] with everything going on in the news,” Coles said. “But if we stop this thing from spreading now, then we can get back to our lives more quickly.”
“We need to respect the restrictions,” he said.
Murphy expressed similar sentiments on social media:
“I take personal responsibility for the public health and safety of New Jersey,” he tweeted Wednesday. “If you are unhappy about our aggressive social distancing measures, I’m sorry. But your safety is my highest priority.”
I take personal responsibility for the public health and safety of New Jersey. If you are unhappy about our aggressive social distancing measures, I’m sorry. But your safety is my highest priority. — Governor Phil Murphy (@GovMurphy) March 18, 2020
As of Saturday morning, there were 890 confirmed cases of the the coronavirus in the state, and 11 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University.
Murphy said Friday that the number of positive tests will continue to rise as coronavirus tests become more available.
To be clear: the number of positive tests is rising, in part, because of expanding capabilities from private labs. We expected these numbers, and we expect them to keep rising, in the short-term, as greater testing capabilities come online. — Governor Phil Murphy (@GovMurphy) March 20, 2020
“We’ve received 155 new positive test results since yesterday, bringing our statewide total to 890,” Murphy wrote. “To be clear: the number of positive tests is rising, in part, because of expanding capabilities from private labs.
“We expected these numbers, and we expect them to keep rising, in the short-term, as greater testing capabilities come online.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-21--Hillary Clinton Did a Shot with Celebrity Host Days Before His Positive COVID-19 Test

Hillary Clinton appeared on Andy Cohen ’ s Bravo talk show , “ Watch What Happens Live , ” days before the host tested positive for COVID-19 .
“ After a few days of self-quarantine , and not feeling great , I have tested positive for Coronavirus , ” he wrote .
“ I want to thank all the medical professionals who are working tirelessly for all of us , and urge everybody to stay home and take care of themselves.
” TRENDING : CNN & MSNBC Commentator Literally Calls for Melania To Be Infected with Coronavirus Clinton appeared on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( the episode was filmed March 4 ) to promote the “ Hillary ” documentary series streaming on Hulu .
Cohen asked Clinton about her tenure as first lady and about the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates , The Washington Post reported .
The most memorable moment of the show was when Clinton did a “ shotski ” — a shot taken off of a ski — with Cohen and former “ The Real Housewives of New York City ” star Dorinda Medley .
As a talk show host , Cohen has a lot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and it is possible he has been an asymptomatic coronavirus carrier throughout the month , as his last episode was filmed March 12 .
The 51-year-old had planned on hosting a home-edition of “ Watch What Happens Live ” this Sunday , but will now focus on recovering , Nexstar reported .
According to Dr. Shruti Gohil of the University of California Irvine Medical Center , asymptomatic carriers can be infectious for 14 days .
“ Once you acquire the illness , you may be infectious to other people for up to 14 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Now , those who are asymptomatic may not know when Day 1 starts to start counting to Day 14.
” Gohil added that asymptomatic carriers can spread the virus if they share things like drinks and utensils with other people , which is why people are encouraged to practice social distancing .
“ That is the reason why we ’ re doing this , not so much because coronavirus is in and of itself so dangerous to the vast majority of patients , ” she said .
“ It ’ s more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ common sense strategies like this will go far.
” The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said that while COVID-19 seems to be spreading easily in the community , people who show symptoms of the virus are currently thought to be the most contagious .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Hillary Clinton appeared on Andy Cohen’s Bravo talk show, “Watch What Happens Live,” days before the host tested positive for COVID-19.
Cohen revealed the test results in a Friday Instagram post.
“After a few days of self-quarantine, and not feeling great, I have tested positive for Coronavirus,” he wrote.
“I want to thank all the medical professionals who are working tirelessly for all of us, and urge everybody to stay home and take care of themselves.”
Clinton appeared on Cohen’s show on March 5 (the episode was filmed March 4) to promote the “Hillary” documentary series streaming on Hulu.
Cohen asked Clinton about her tenure as first lady and about the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates, The Washington Post reported.
The most memorable moment of the show was when Clinton did a “shotski” — a shot taken off of a ski — with Cohen and former “The Real Housewives of New York City” star Dorinda Medley.
Are you worried about being an asymptomatic carrier? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 23% (305 Votes) No: 77% (1001 Votes)
As a talk show host, Cohen has a lot of contact with celebrities like Clinton, and it is possible he has been an asymptomatic coronavirus carrier throughout the month, as his last episode was filmed March 12.
The 51-year-old had planned on hosting a home-edition of “Watch What Happens Live” this Sunday, but will now focus on recovering, Nexstar reported.
According to Dr. Shruti Gohil of the University of California Irvine Medical Center, asymptomatic carriers can be infectious for 14 days.
“Once you acquire the illness, you may be infectious to other people for up to 14 days,” she told LAist.
“Now, those who are asymptomatic may not know when Day 1 starts to start counting to Day 14.”
Gohil added that asymptomatic carriers can spread the virus if they share things like drinks and utensils with other people, which is why people are encouraged to practice social distancing.
“That is the reason why we’re doing this, not so much because coronavirus is in and of itself so dangerous to the vast majority of patients,” she said. “It’s more that [cutting] its circulation by common sense strategies like this will go far.”
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said that while COVID-19 seems to be spreading easily in the community, people who show symptoms of the virus are currently thought to be the most contagious.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-21--Light in the Darkness: Americans Hang Christmas Lights to Spread Joy During COVID-19 Outbreak

Even though three months have passed since Christmas , Americans are bringing back the most wonderful time of the year to spread joy in their neighborhoods during the COVID-19 outbreak .
People have been hanging their Christmas lights up again as a way to spread hope while maintaining social distance .
Lane Grindle , a broadcaster for the Milwaukee Brewers baseball team , suggested on Sunday that doing so would make for a fun and safe activity during this time of emergency .
“ What if we all put our Christmas lights back up ?
” Grindle tweeted .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and drive around and look at them .
That seems like a fair social distancing activity.
” TRENDING : CNN & MSNBC Commentator Literally Calls for Melania To Be Infected with Coronavirus Many Americans responded to the idea with enthusiasm , posting pictures of their redecorating in the comments .
For many , the decorations serve as a beacon of hope .
Some Americans are using their lights to display their patriotism .
Folks abroad have also joined in to spread holiday cheer amidst the widespread fear of the virus .
Unfortunately , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the festivities , as Fox News noted .
So far , California , New York , Connecticut and Illinois have all issued similar mandates asking residents to stay home save for essential travel , and other states may follow suit .
But if nothing else , that makes these small demonstrations of hope and community all the more important as America continues to grapple with coronavirus .
According to Johns Hopkins , there were nearly 20,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the United States and at least 260 deaths as of Saturday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ domestic travel , but has asked Americans to avoid “ discretionary travel ” through at least the end of March , according to USA Today .
In spite of all this , these Christmas light displays serve as another example of the resilience of Americans .
Ingenuity and creativity have always been a hallmark of the American people , particularly when their backs are up against the wall .
Putting up decorations is a very small action , but it serves as a beacon of hope and courage — the United States is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus pandemic and come out of it stronger .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Even though three months have passed since Christmas, Americans are bringing back the most wonderful time of the year to spread joy in their neighborhoods during the COVID-19 outbreak.
People have been hanging their Christmas lights up again as a way to spread hope while maintaining social distance.
Lane Grindle, a broadcaster for the Milwaukee Brewers baseball team, suggested on Sunday that doing so would make for a fun and safe activity during this time of emergency.
“What if we all put our Christmas lights back up?” Grindle tweeted. “Then we could get in the car and drive around and look at them. That seems like a fair social distancing activity.”
What if we all put our Christmas lights back up? Then we could get in the car and drive around and look at them. That seems like a fair social distancing activity. — Lane Grindle (@lanegrindle) March 15, 2020
Many Americans responded to the idea with enthusiasm, posting pictures of their redecorating in the comments.
Watson Louisiana is in! pic.twitter.com/iEu5MTWmIE — Amanda Boudreaux (@Aboudreaux13) March 18, 2020
For many, the decorations serve as a beacon of hope.
Sound On. Lights On. Hearts lifted. ❤ We had our first confirmed case of #COVID19 in Cheatham County, Tennessee today. Our response is to be the light, and stay home! #FlattenTheCurve y’all. Have yourself a Merry Little Quarantine. ?#CoronaVirusChallenge #christmaslights #love pic.twitter.com/HmkTCm5O2Q — Brenda Sparks (@theatreartist) March 19, 2020
Some Americans are using their lights to display their patriotism.
Folks abroad have also joined in to spread holiday cheer amidst the widespread fear of the virus.
Unfortunately, not everyone will be able to partake in the festivities, as Fox News noted. So far, California, New York, Connecticut and Illinois have all issued similar mandates asking residents to stay home save for essential travel, and other states may follow suit.
But if nothing else, that makes these small demonstrations of hope and community all the more important as America continues to grapple with coronavirus.
Will you put up Christmas lights to encourage your neighborhood? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 62% (48 Votes) No: 38% (30 Votes)
According to Johns Hopkins, there were nearly 20,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the United States and at least 260 deaths as of Saturday morning. President Trump has not banned domestic travel, but has asked Americans to avoid “discretionary travel” through at least the end of March, according to USA Today.
In spite of all this, these Christmas light displays serve as another example of the resilience of Americans. Ingenuity and creativity have always been a hallmark of the American people, particularly when their backs are up against the wall.
Putting up decorations is a very small action, but it serves as a beacon of hope and courage — the United States is determined to weather the effects of the coronavirus pandemic and come out of it stronger.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-21--IL Pizza Parlor Forced To Shut Down Posts Unmistakable Message to Dem Governor

The shutdown of bars and restaurants ordered by Democratic Illinois Gov .
J.B. Pritzker as part of his state ’ s effort to battle the coronavirus struck one restaurant operator as heavy-handed , and she let the world know it , to her cost .
After the order was promulgated by the governor , festooned across the front of the Rosati ’ s Pizza franchise in Taylorville was a spray-painted message short on polite language but long on emotion .
WARNING : The following image contains vulgar language that some viewers may find offensive .
Viewer discretion is advised .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pritzker ] had no business shutting my business down , ” restaurant owner Peggy Brandon , 57 , told the Decatur , Illinois-based Herald & Review .
TRENDING : CNN & MSNBC Commentator Literally Calls for Melania To Be Infected with Coronavirus Brandon has been operating the restaurant for a year , and said business has been good — until now .
She said she ’ s not sure if the 150-seat restaurant can survive the forced shutdown .
“ I just don ’ t know , I couldn ’ t tell you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” she said .
Not everyone saluted her response : The Illinois edict , much like those in other states , allows for deliveries and pick-up orders , but Brandon said neither make up much of her business .
As a result , she said , 20 employees have lost their paychecks .
“ Look , there have been no reported cases [ of coronavirus ] in Christian County .
And yet [ Pritzker ] wants me and my servers to go without income for two weeks .
Is the government going to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re not , ” she said , cursing Pritzker and adding , “ He needs to go.
” Instead , it was Brandon who went .
The chain did not appreciate her comments , and yanked her franchise agreement , according to the Herald & Review , calling her actions “ juvenile.
” A statement from Rosati ’ s said that Brandon ’ s “ disagreement with the Governor ’ s decision in no way represents our position.
” “ We stand with the Illinois Restaurant Association and the Governor in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and take extraordinary measures to halt the spread of COVID-19 , ” the statement said , according to WICS .
“ All of our locations are working hard to implement new safety measures to provide for the well-being of our customers and employees .
“ Regrettably , this one individual took an irresponsible approach.
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

The shutdown of bars and restaurants ordered by Democratic Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker as part of his state’s effort to battle the coronavirus struck one restaurant operator as heavy-handed, and she let the world know it, to her cost.
After the order was promulgated by the governor, festooned across the front of the Rosati’s Pizza franchise in Taylorville was a spray-painted message short on polite language but long on emotion.
“Gov Pritzker,” it read, “Screw You.”
WARNING: The following image contains vulgar language that some viewers may find offensive. Viewer discretion is advised.
“I did it myself because [Pritzker] had no business shutting my business down,” restaurant owner Peggy Brandon, 57, told the Decatur, Illinois-based Herald & Review.
Brandon has been operating the restaurant for a year, and said business has been good — until now.
Did Brandon's message go too far? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 23% (1050 Votes) No: 77% (3539 Votes)
She said she’s not sure if the 150-seat restaurant can survive the forced shutdown.
“I just don’t know, I couldn’t tell you if we’ll make it,” she said.
“But I doubt it.”
Not everyone saluted her response:
Unbelievable, this Taylorville IL Rosati’s Pizza putting making money over the health and lives of others! I hope @Rosatis_Pizza revokes this restaurants franchise because I’m appalled! Makes me want to never go to any Rosati’s pizza ever again! pic.twitter.com/Dm3i4CLAx6 — Autumn Temple (@AutumnTemple4) March 20, 2020
The Illinois edict, much like those in other states, allows for deliveries and pick-up orders, but Brandon said neither make up much of her business.
As a result, she said, 20 employees have lost their paychecks.
“Look, there have been no reported cases [of coronavirus] in Christian County. And yet [Pritzker] wants me and my servers to go without income for two weeks. Is the government going to pay us? Hell no, they’re not,” she said, cursing Pritzker and adding, “He needs to go.”
We apologize for the behavior of our Taylorville Franchisee. We will be taking strict action directly. — Rosati’s Pizza (@Rosatis_Pizza) March 16, 2020
Instead, it was Brandon who went.
The chain did not appreciate her comments, and yanked her franchise agreement, according to the Herald & Review, calling her actions “juvenile.”
A statement from Rosati’s said that Brandon’s “disagreement with the Governor’s decision in no way represents our position.”
“We stand with the Illinois Restaurant Association and the Governor in this difficult decision; we must work together and take extraordinary measures to halt the spread of COVID-19,” the statement said, according to WICS.
“All of our locations are working hard to implement new safety measures to provide for the well-being of our customers and employees.
“Regrettably, this one individual took an irresponsible approach.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-21--Former MMA Fighter Accused of Murdering 2 in Texas, Faces Additional Charges in Cold Case

If convicted , a 45-year-old former mixed martial arts fighter who went by the moniker “ Spider-Man ” in the ring could become known by a new descriptor : “ serial killer.
” Not only is Cedric “ Spider-Man ” Marks , whose last professional fight came in 2018 , accused of slaughtering two people in Texas last year , but authorities have also recently connected him to an 11-year-old cold case .
Marks is suspected of having strangled his ex-girlfriend , 28-year-old Jenna Scott , and 32-year-old Michael Swearingin in January 2019 .
However , new charges have surfaced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggest he may have killed before .
Marks and his alleged accomplice , Kellee Sorensen , are now facing charges for the 2009 abduction and murder of April Pease , the mother of one of Marks ’ children , The Associated Press reported .
TRENDING : CNN & MSNBC Commentator Literally Calls for Melania To Be Infected with Coronavirus The provoking factor in this previously unsolved mystery may have stemmed from an alleged custody dispute , according to the AP .
“ In 2009 , April Pease and her child relocated to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ several domestic assaults by Marks , ” the Bloomington Police Department in Minnesota said in a news release this week .
“ The investigation revealed that in March of 2009 , Marks and Sorensen traveled to Minnesota from Washington and located April Pease at the women ’ s shelter.
” “ Pease was taken against her will and driven southbound on I-35 , ” the statement added .
Citing statements made by detectives , police said the victim was murdered solely by Marks while Sorensen waited in the car .
Marks “ told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hands and teeth so she couldn ’ t be identified , ” the AP reported , citing court documents .
Both suspects are being charged with second-degree murder .
RELATED : Immigrants Arrested by ICE in 2019 Had Been Convicted of Over 1,500 Murders Texas prosecutors are already seeking the death penalty against Marks for his alleged role in the 2019 double-murder , CBS DFW reported , though Marks has pleaded not guilty .
The current whereabouts of Pease ’ s body , meanwhile , are currently unknown .
Police announced the latest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same day as the 11th anniversary of Pease ’ s disappearance .
“ Our thoughts are with her family as they reflect back on the eleven painful years since she went missing , ” the police statement read .
“ We would like to thank all the local , state , and federal law enforcement agencies that assisted with this homicide case that spanned over four different states .
“ We would also like to recognize our Detectives , both current and now retired , who worked on this missing person case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ They never gave up on trying to find April and hold those responsible for her disappearance accountable , ” the statement concluded .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

If convicted, a 45-year-old former mixed martial arts fighter who went by the moniker “Spider-Man” in the ring could become known by a new descriptor: “serial killer.”
Not only is Cedric “Spider-Man” Marks, whose last professional fight came in 2018, accused of slaughtering two people in Texas last year, but authorities have also recently connected him to an 11-year-old cold case.
Marks is suspected of having strangled his ex-girlfriend, 28-year-old Jenna Scott, and 32-year-old Michael Swearingin in January 2019.
However, new charges have surfaced in connection with the cold case that suggest he may have killed before.
Marks and his alleged accomplice, Kellee Sorensen, are now facing charges for the 2009 abduction and murder of April Pease, the mother of one of Marks’ children, The Associated Press reported.
The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office in Minnesota has charged two people with the second-degree murder of April Pease. One of them is Cedric Joseph Marks: https://t.co/HHeUv07H5R #fox44tx pic.twitter.com/iZRDMTKEVQ — KWKT FOX 44 (@KWKTFOX44) March 17, 2020
The provoking factor in this previously unsolved mystery may have stemmed from an alleged custody dispute, according to the AP.
“In 2009, April Pease and her child relocated to a women’s shelter in Bloomington following several domestic assaults by Marks,” the Bloomington Police Department in Minnesota said in a news release this week.
Do you think Marks deserves the death penalty? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 98% (385 Votes) No: 2% (7 Votes)
“The investigation revealed that in March of 2009, Marks and Sorensen traveled to Minnesota from Washington and located April Pease at the women’s shelter.”
“Pease was taken against her will and driven southbound on I-35,” the statement added.
Citing statements made by detectives, police said the victim was murdered solely by Marks while Sorensen waited in the car.
Marks “told Sorensen he killed Pease and removed her hands and teeth so she couldn’t be identified,” the AP reported, citing court documents.
Both suspects are being charged with second-degree murder.
Texas prosecutors are already seeking the death penalty against Marks for his alleged role in the 2019 double-murder, CBS DFW reported, though Marks has pleaded not guilty.
The current whereabouts of Pease’s body, meanwhile, are currently unknown.
Police announced the latest charges on Monday, March 16 — the same day as the 11th anniversary of Pease’s disappearance.
Two charged with murder of April Pease on 11th anniversary of her disappearancehttps://t.co/aSUav26Leu — FOX 9 (@FOX9) March 17, 2020
“Our thoughts are with her family as they reflect back on the eleven painful years since she went missing,” the police statement read.
“We would like to thank all the local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies that assisted with this homicide case that spanned over four different states.
“We would also like to recognize our Detectives, both current and now retired, who worked on this missing person case that today lead to murder charges.
“They never gave up on trying to find April and hold those responsible for her disappearance accountable,” the statement concluded.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-03-21--Country Music Legend Kenny Rogers Dead at 81

The Gambler just broke even .
Country music legend Kenny Rogers died Friday night at home at age 81 , according to a statement issued on Twitter by his family .
“ The Rogers family is sad to announce that Kenny Rogers passed away last night at 10:25PM at the age of 81 , ” the statement said .
“ Rogers passed away peacefully at home from natural causes under the care of hospice and surrounded by his family.
” TRENDING : In Priceless Exchange , Trump Tells Press He Should Get Rid of 75 % of Them To Keep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ step on the road to becoming an American musical legend in 1977 with the hit song “ Lucille.
” He followed that up in 1978 with “ The Gambler , ” a song that became an integral part of his performing persona and which included lines that became part of the fabric of America : “ You ’ ve got to know when to hold ’ em ; Know when to fold ’ em ; Know when to walk away ; And know when to run.
” The song about the encounter between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the poignant line : “ The best that you can hope for is to die in your sleep.
” The song later described the death of the gambler this way : “ Somewhere in the darkness ; The gambler he broke even.
” Rogers often collaborated with country icon Dolly Parton , making “ Islands in the Stream ” one of country music ’ s most famous duets .
Rogers recalled the making of the song in a 2017 interview with NBC ’ s “ Today.
” “ The story is the producer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of the Bee Gees , Barry Gibb , ” Rogers said .
“ And we had been singing this song in my studio in L.A. for four days .
And I finally said , ‘ Barry , I don ’ t even like this song anymore.
’ And he said , ‘ We need Dolly Parton.
” ’ RELATED : Hillary Clinton Did a Shot with Celebrity Host Days Before His Positive COVID-19 Test Parton was actually close by .
“ I said , ‘ Well , why not , you know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And Ken Kragen , my manager said , ‘ I saw her downstairs.
’ I said , ‘ Well , go get her.
’ And Dolly , in her inimitable fashion , marched into the room and the song was never the same.
” Parton posted her reaction to the death of her collaborator and friend on Twitter : Many others also mourned the passing of Rogers : “ Kenny Rogers left an indelible mark on the history of American music .
His songs have endeared music lovers and touched the lives of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Keith Hagan said in a statement .
Rogers will have a small private funeral , but when limits on large gatherings are lifted , his family members “ look forward to celebrating Kenny ’ s life publicly with his friends and fans at a later date , ” Hagan ’ s statement said .
“ I ’ ve been so lucky to have enjoyed such a long career and to have such amazing support from my fans and all who have helped me along the way , but there comes a time when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with my family , ” Rogers said as he began his final tour , ” according to his website .
“ My life is about my wife and my 11-year-old twin boys right now .
There are a lot of things I want to do together with them to create some special memories .
I don ’ t have a bucket list of my own , ” he added .
“ I have a bucket list of things I want to do with them.
” Over the course of his career , Rogers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ won six Country Music Association awards and also netted three Grammys , according to Fox News .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

The Gambler just broke even.
Country music legend Kenny Rogers died Friday night at home at age 81, according to a statement issued on Twitter by his family.
“The Rogers family is sad to announce that Kenny Rogers passed away last night at 10:25PM at the age of 81,” the statement said.
“Rogers passed away peacefully at home from natural causes under the care of hospice and surrounded by his family.”
The Rogers family is sad to announce that Kenny Rogers passed away last night at 10:25PM at the age of 81. Rogers passed away peacefully at home from natural causes under the care of hospice and surrounded by his family. https://t.co/adxAgiMW2s pic.twitter.com/nggWiiotMT — Kenny Rogers (@_KennyRogers) March 21, 2020
Rogers took his first step on the road to becoming an American musical legend in 1977 with the hit song “Lucille.”
He followed that up in 1978 with “The Gambler,” a song that became an integral part of his performing persona and which included lines that became part of the fabric of America: “You’ve got to know when to hold ’em; Know when to fold ’em; Know when to walk away; And know when to run.”
The song about the encounter between a drifter and a gambler also included the poignant line: “The best that you can hope for is to die in your sleep.”
The song later described the death of the gambler this way: “Somewhere in the darkness; The gambler he broke even.”
Rogers often collaborated with country icon Dolly Parton, making “Islands in the Stream” one of country music’s most famous duets.
Rogers recalled the making of the song in a 2017 interview with NBC’s “Today.”
“The story is the producer and the writer on the song was one of the Bee Gees, Barry Gibb,” Rogers said.
“And we had been singing this song in my studio in L.A. for four days. And I finally said, ‘Barry, I don’t even like this song anymore.’ And he said, ‘We need Dolly Parton.”’
Parton was actually close by.
“I said, ‘Well, why not, you know?”’ Rogers said.
“And Ken Kragen, my manager said, ‘I saw her downstairs.’ I said, ‘Well, go get her.’ And Dolly, in her inimitable fashion, marched into the room and the song was never the same.”
Parton posted her reaction to the death of her collaborator and friend on Twitter:
So you be safe with God and just know that I will always love you, dolly. — Dolly Parton (@DollyParton) March 21, 2020
Many others also mourned the passing of Rogers:
I’m very sad to learn that @_KennyRogers has passed away. Kenny was a friend who helped me in so many ways early on. He was always funny, kind and full of advice. Kenny’s legacy of great music will live on forever. My deepest condolences to Wanda & family. #RIPKennyRogers pic.twitter.com/lZo6XI3yma — Travis Tritt (@Travistritt) March 21, 2020
I feel like every time my dad drove me anywhere as a kid I heard The Gambler by Kenny Rogers. I loved it. I had no idea what
the words meant but I didn’t know that I didn’t know what the words meant. That song is a part of stunning body of work. ?❤ ? #RIPKennyRogers — Mike Birbiglia (@birbigs) March 21, 2020
“You never count your money when you’re sittin’ at the table.
There’ll be time enough for countin’ when the dealin’s done.”— Kenny Rogers 1938-2020. pic.twitter.com/cWPsNiizTS — Sean Mcdowell (@dvesean) March 21, 2020
“Kenny Rogers left an indelible mark on the history of American music. His songs have endeared music lovers and touched the lives of millions around the world,” publicist Keith Hagan said in a statement.
Rogers will have a small private funeral, but when limits on large gatherings are lifted, his family members “look forward to celebrating Kenny’s life publicly with his friends and fans at a later date,” Hagan’s statement said.
“I’ve been so lucky to have enjoyed such a long career and to have such amazing support from my fans and all who have helped me along the way, but there comes a time when I need to focus on spending time with my family,” Rogers said as he began his final tour,” according to his website.
“My life is about my wife and my 11-year-old twin boys right now. There are a lot of things I want to do together with them to create some special memories. I don’t have a bucket list of my own,” he added.
“I have a bucket list of things I want to do with them.”
Over the course of his career, Rogers had 24 No. 1 hits, won six Country Music Association awards and also netted three Grammys, according to Fox News.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.