westernjournal--2020-11-29--Researcher Stumbles Across Worrying Discovery in Nevada, Look What She Says Was Listed as a Home Add

Researcher Stumbles Across Worrying Discovery in Nevada, Look What She Says Was Listed as a Home Address for Some Voters

I ’ m sure there are any number of people in the state of Nevada who could be said , in a manner of speaking , to live in a casino .
They wouldn ’ t list it as their place of residence , however — at least not unless they were filling out a new voter registration for the 2020 election .
Yet , apparently there were dozens of people registered in gambling parlors in the state ’ s 3rd Congressional District , according to the Washington Examiner columnist Paul Bedard .
That district covers most of the southern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Las Vegas and the state ’ s most populous county by a wide margin .
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Republican Dan Rodimer , who lost in the 3rd Congressional District by 13,000 votes to Democratic Rep. Susie Lee .
According to the Nevada Independent , a nonprofit news site founded in 2017 , the case was dismissed by a judge on Wednesday .
The court ruled it did not have jurisdiction in the matter .
Dorothy Morgan , identified as a data scientist in the Republican lawsuit challenging Nevada ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data from voter registrations in the congressional district “ historically strange ” due to the number of new registrations filed that didn ’ t contain information such as the birthdate of the voter or their sex , according to the Bedard .
“ This investigation found over 13K voters whose voter registration information revealed no sex or date of birth , ” Morgan wrote in a two-page affidavit , according to Bedard .
TRENDING : Researcher Stumbles Across Worrying Discovery in Nevada , Look What She Says Was Listed as a Home Address @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this mean we can not verify whether these voters are old enough to vote , it is also historically strange : While one does not expect voter registration information to be perfect , it is very strange that there were very , very few of these kinds of imperfect records with missing or invalid information until this year — when there are 13,372 of them.
” There were only 68 of those voter registrations in the 2016 election , Bedard wrote ; and 74 percent of the registrations with the incomplete registration information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And then there were the addresses on the voter registrations .
“ I have also identified dozens of voters who listed as their home or mailing addresses a temporary RV park and casino , ” Morgan wrote , according to Bedard .
“ Based on the results I have found in the limited time I have had to analyze this dataset , I expect to find additional oddities in the election data as I conduct further analysis.
” The affidavit was forwarded to President Donald Trump ’ s legal team , Bedard wrote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state — and its six electoral votes — by a margin of just over 33,000 votes .
In an interview on Thanksgiving Day , Bedard wrote , the Texas-based Morgan said that “ it ’ s weird .
So what I found was that there are just a lot of people who have zero birthdays , zero birth month , and then unknown sex.
” “ I saw is that you have a handful of people [ making that error in 2016 ] and then all of a sudden you have 13,000 people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ’ s just , that ’ s not right.
” There were other problems with the vote this year in Nevada , too .
RELATED : With Biden Edging Closer to White House , Mexican Ambassador Urges Resumption of Mass Migration Into USA At least one race in Clark County needs to be re-run because of 139 discrepancies in the vote , more than the tight margin of victory .
Overall , in Clark County , there were 936 discrepancies — nowhere near the total separating the two candidates in the presidential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , again , but also something worth taking note of .
Meanwhile , there were the usual issues with mail-in voting and questions about signature-matching .
The state of Nevada mailed a ballot to every registered voter in Nevada due to the exigencies of 2020 , something that raised eyebrows after how poorly Clark County did during a June primary .
In that election , 223,000 ballots were undeliverable .
Meanwhile , a Las Vegas Review-Journal columnist conducted a test to figure out how well election officials could catch ballots using signatures that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the letter of the law ) .
They couldn ’ t , so 89 percent of the ballots went through .
None of this necessarily constitutes proof anything in the state of Nevada would have changed , although it ’ s again a sign that the election of 2020 was a profoundly chaotic one where states had difficulties adjusting to the realities on the ground .
It ’ s one where , up until a month after Election Day , no one seemed to notice registered voters who “ lived in ” casinos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voters in one congressional district who registered with significant chunks of information missing .
This , mind you , is just Nevada .
There aren ’ t enough TED Talks in the world to go through all the voter irregularities we saw during the 2020 election process .
And yet , none of this seemed at all troubling to The New York Times , a paper whose editorial board declared this last Sunday : “ A Great Election , Against All Odds.
” “ The 2020 election was not simply free of fraud @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is braying about at this hour .
It was , from an administrative standpoint , a resounding success , ” the article read .
“ In the face of a raging pandemic and the highest turnout in more than a century , Americans enjoyed one of the most secure , most accurate and most well-run elections ever.
” Yes , an election in which , in just a single Nevada congressional district , 13,000 voter registration applications unencumbered by necessary information weren ’ t rejected .
Where people who live in casinos and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
One where signature matching was so inclusive that almost all of a small sample of ballots with deliberately incorrect signatures were accepted .
But stop questioning these sorts of things .
It was a great election , against all evidence .
I mean odds .
All odds .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

I’m sure there are any number of people in the state of Nevada who could be said, in a manner of speaking, to live in a casino. They wouldn’t list it as their place of residence, however — at least not unless they were filling out a new voter registration for the 2020 election.
Yet, apparently there were dozens of people registered in gambling parlors in the state’s 3rd Congressional District, according to the Washington Examiner columnist Paul Bedard. That district covers most of the southern part of Clark County, home to Las Vegas and the state’s most populous county by a wide margin.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Republican Dan Rodimer, who lost in the 3rd Congressional District by 13,000 votes to Democratic Rep. Susie Lee. According to the Nevada Independent, a nonprofit news site founded in 2017, the case was dismissed by a judge on Wednesday. The court ruled it did not have jurisdiction in the matter.
Dorothy Morgan, identified as a data scientist in the Republican lawsuit challenging Nevada’s election results, also called the data from voter registrations in the congressional district “historically strange” due to the number of new registrations filed that didn’t contain information such as the birthdate of the voter or their sex, according to the Bedard.
“This investigation found over 13K voters whose voter registration information revealed no sex or date of birth,” Morgan wrote in a two-page affidavit, according to Bedard.
“Not only does this mean we cannot verify whether these voters are old enough to vote, it is also historically strange: While one does not expect voter registration information to be perfect, it is very strange that there were very, very few of these kinds of imperfect records with missing or invalid information until this year — when there are 13,372 of them.”
There were only 68 of those voter registrations in the 2016 election, Bedard wrote; and 74 percent of the registrations with the incomplete registration information took place between July and September.
And then there were the addresses on the voter registrations.
“I have also identified dozens of voters who listed as their home or mailing addresses a temporary RV park and casino,” Morgan wrote, according to Bedard.
Do you think that these irregularities need to be investigated? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 100% (6307 Votes) No: 0% (4 Votes)
“Based on the results I have found in the limited time I have had to analyze this dataset, I expect to find additional oddities in the election data as I conduct further analysis.”
The affidavit was forwarded to President Donald Trump’s legal team, Bedard wrote. Democratic nominee Joe Biden won the state — and its six electoral votes — by a margin of just over 33,000 votes.
In an interview on Thanksgiving Day, Bedard wrote, the Texas-based Morgan said that “it’s weird. So what I found was that there are just a lot of people who have zero birthdays, zero birth month, and then unknown sex.”
“I saw is that you have a handful of people [making that error in 2016] and then all of a sudden you have 13,000 people making that error in 2020, and that’s just, that’s not right.”
There were other problems with the vote this year in Nevada, too.
At least one race in Clark County needs to be re-run because of 139 discrepancies in the vote, more than the tight margin of victory. Overall, in Clark County, there were 936 discrepancies — nowhere near the total separating the two candidates in the presidential race or even the 3rd Congressional District, again, but also something worth taking note of.
Meanwhile, there were the usual issues with mail-in voting and questions about signature-matching.
The state of Nevada mailed a ballot to every registered voter in Nevada due to the exigencies of 2020, something that raised eyebrows after how poorly Clark County did during a June primary. In that election, 223,000 ballots were undeliverable.
Meanwhile, a Las Vegas Review-Journal columnist conducted a test to figure out how well election officials could catch ballots using signatures that were deliberately off (while still following the letter of the law). They couldn’t, so 89 percent of the ballots went through.
None of this necessarily constitutes proof anything in the state of Nevada would have changed, although it’s again a sign that the election of 2020 was a profoundly chaotic one where states had difficulties adjusting to the realities on the ground.
It’s one where, up until a month after Election Day, no one seemed to notice registered voters who “lived in” casinos or RV parks, or over 10,000 voters in one congressional district who registered with significant chunks of information missing.
This, mind you, is just Nevada. There aren’t enough TED Talks in the world to go through all the voter irregularities we saw during the 2020 election process.
And yet, none of this seemed at all troubling to The New York Times, a paper whose editorial board declared this last Sunday: “A Great Election, Against All Odds.”
“The 2020 election was not simply free of fraud, or whatever cooked-up malfeasance the president is braying about at this hour. It was, from an administrative standpoint, a resounding success,” the article read.
“In the face of a raging pandemic and the highest turnout in more than a century, Americans enjoyed one of the most secure, most accurate and most well-run elections ever.”
Yes, an election in which, in just a single Nevada congressional district, 13,000 voter registration applications unencumbered by necessary information weren’t rejected. Where people who live in casinos and RV parks for vacationers were finally counted. One where signature matching was so inclusive that almost all of a small sample of ballots with deliberately incorrect signatures were accepted.
But stop questioning these sorts of things. It was a great election, against all evidence. I mean odds. All odds.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-11-29--Patriots Call Lib Mayor’s Bluff, Show up in Force and Dare Him To Follow Through with Threat

Residents of San Antonio , Texas , could not have chosen more appropriate setting to protest their mayor ’ s newly declared curfew : The Alamo , the site of the famous 1836 battle , is itself a symbol of resistance .
Due to the area ’ s rising number of COVID-19 cases , San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg , a political liberal who first won the officially non-partisan mayor ’ s office in 2017 , imposed a 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. curfew on city residents , which would carry a fine of $ 1,000 for violations .
WOAI-TV @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take effect on Thanksgiving and continue until Monday morning .
The full order can be viewed here .
“ The curfew specifically bans social gatherings , even in residents ’ backyards but still allows for curbside delivery and excuses essential work , ” according to KABB-TV .
TRENDING : Researcher Stumbles Across Worrying Discovery in Nevada , Look What She Says Was Listed as a Home Address for Some Voters In response , a group called “ This Is Texas Freedom Force ” organized a protest to defy the order .
In a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the group wrote , “ Our right to protest is protected by the Constitution !
No Boston liberal mayor & his unconstitutional curfew is going to take those rights from us .
We will [ be ] contacting our legal council Friday morning in preparation .
Join us at the Alamo on Saturday at 10:30pm .
Bring flags & signs.
” KABB reported , “ hundreds of Trump supporters gathered in front of the Alamo ” on Friday night .
According to the report , demonstrators began arriving at 11 p.m. and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ midnight.
” ( Note : The announcement of the event states it had been planned for Saturday night , but it actually took place on Friday night ) .
One protestor had a message for Mayor Nirenberg .
Speaking to the group , he said , “ Mayor Nirenberg , it ’ s 11 p.m. , we are outdoors doing a social gathering – this is illegal – I want you personally to come out here and fine me my $ 1,000 , because guess what ?
I ’ m not even paying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He told the crowd , “ Guys , we follow the law .
But we follow the law when it fits within our constitutional rights.
” He talked about getting more like-minded people elected to the city council .
He said , “ Let ’ s have some fun.
” RELATED : Dem Senators Give Us a Preview of What a Nationwide Mask Mandate Could Look Like with New Bill “ The Star-Spangled Banner ” played in the background , followed by a recording of President Trump delivering an America First speech .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ They broke into a chant of “ USA , USA ” and also gave a shout out to the military .
It was well after midnight when these remarks were made at the Alamo and there were no signs of a police presence .
The report makes no mention of any arrests or fines imposed upon the participants .
This event was a textbook example of a peaceful protest .
It ’ s heartening to see Americans pushing back against the overreach of politicians , mostly Democrats , who are using the pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I hope to see citizens all across the country rise up and fight the current Democratic power grab .
If we stop resisting , we will lose our freedom .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Residents of San Antonio, Texas, could not have chosen more appropriate setting to protest their mayor’s newly declared curfew: The Alamo, the site of the famous 1836 battle, is itself a symbol of resistance.
Due to the area’s rising number of COVID-19 cases, San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg, a political liberal who first won the officially non-partisan mayor’s office in 2017, imposed a 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. curfew on city residents, which would carry a fine of $1,000 for violations.
WOAI-TV reported that the curfew was scheduled to take effect on Thanksgiving and continue until Monday morning.
The full order can be viewed here.
“The curfew specifically bans social gatherings, even in residents’ backyards but still allows for curbside delivery and excuses essential work,” according to KABB-TV.
In response, a group called “This Is Texas Freedom Force” organized a protest to defy the order.
In a Nov. 25 announcement of the event, the group wrote, “Our right to protest is protected by the Constitution! No Boston liberal mayor & his unconstitutional curfew is going to take those rights from us. We will [be] contacting our legal council Friday morning in preparation. Join us at the Alamo on Saturday at 10:30pm. Bring flags & signs.”
Our right to protest is protected by the Constitution! No Boston liberal mayor & his unconstitutional curfew is going to take those rights from us.We will contacting our legal council Friday morning in preparation. Join us at the Alamo on Saturday at 10:30pm. Bring flags & signs. pic.twitter.com/sFfzyJb6Ky — This Is Texas Freedom Force (@ThisIsTexasFF) November 26, 2020
KABB reported, “hundreds of Trump supporters gathered in front of the Alamo” on Friday night. According to the report, demonstrators began arriving at 11 p.m. and the event “lasted until a little after midnight.”
(Note: The announcement of the event states it had been planned for Saturday night, but it actually took place on Friday night).
'Fine me!' Hundreds of Trump supporters gather in front of the Alamo to protest curfew https://t.co/q7BypuPckT — KABB FOX 29 (@KABBFOX29) November 28, 2020
One protestor had a message for Mayor Nirenberg. Speaking to the group, he said, “Mayor Nirenberg, it’s 11 p.m., we are outdoors doing a social gathering – this is illegal – I want you personally to come out here and fine me my $1,000, because guess what? I’m not even paying it anyway.”
The man continued. He told the crowd, “Guys, we follow the law. But we follow the law when it fits within our constitutional rights.”
He talked about getting more like-minded people elected to the city council.
He said, “Let’s have some fun.”
“The Star-Spangled Banner” played in the background, followed by a recording of President Trump delivering an America First speech.
There were calls for “freedom.” They broke into a chant of “USA, USA” and also gave a shout out to the military.
It was well after midnight when these remarks were made at the Alamo and there were no signs of a police presence. The report makes no mention of any arrests or fines imposed upon the participants.
Do you believe that liberal politicians are using COVID-19 as an excuse to increase their power? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 100% (4270 Votes) No: 0% (14 Votes)
This event was a textbook example of a peaceful protest. It’s heartening to see Americans pushing back against the overreach of politicians, mostly Democrats, who are using the pandemic to increase their power over us.
I hope to see citizens all across the country rise up and fight the current Democratic power grab. If we stop resisting, we will lose our freedom.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-11-29--With Biden Edging Closer to White House, Mexican Ambassador Urges Resumption of Mass Migration Into

With Biden Edging Closer to White House, Mexican Ambassador Urges Resumption of Mass Migration Into USA

With Democratic Joe Biden viewed as the presumed president-elect more than three weeks after the still-contested Nov. 3 election , those seeking to enter the country illegally are likely feeling emboldened to soon overwhelm the country ’ s immigration system .
They ’ re certainly not being discouraged to do so by Mexico ’ s ambassador to the U.S .
Despite the inroads the country has made the last four years with regard to border security and enforcement under President Donald Trump , the thought of a Democrat in the White House has border security opponents salivating .
Mexican Ambassador @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a forum for immigration last week , encouraged an official pivot on immigration that would see American border policy more or less revert back to the days of former President Barack Obama .
Addressing the National Immigration Forum on Nov. 17 , the ambassador advocated for an immigration policy that offers mass amnesty , more asylum protections and an influx of foreign refugees .
She even brushed off the notion that an open border is a national security issue .
TRENDING : Researcher Stumbles Across Worrying Discovery in Nevada , Look What She @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Some Voters Telling the forum that America ’ s immigration system must “ be based on facts and realities , ” Coqui said the country must embrace an immigration stance based on “ generosity.
” “ The facts and realities is the need to protect the most vulnerable , the need to keep open the generosity towards refugees , the need to recognize the complementarity of labor markets and demographic profiles , the need for temporary workers in the United States , ” she stated .
It ’ s not clear how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ benefit Americans struggling with a crime wave , unprecedented division and the loss of millions of jobs amid a once-in-a-century pandemic .
But that didn ’ t stop the diplomat from advising the country on how it should handle millions of illegal immigrants already here , and what she hopes happens , she said she ’ d like to see more enter the country in the years to come .
“ If you conceptualize migration as a national security issue , if you [ push for ] securitization of migration , and what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ migration , then your approach always be policing , contentious [ and ] reduction of migration , ” Coqui said .
Coqui concluded Americans must accept unchecked migration from Mexico and Central America , as it is “ an economic and social and political phenomena.
” “ What we would like to see , of course , is that the U.S. embassies in Central America could process even more of these requests for asylum , instead of having people crossing through Mexico and asking for asylum at the border , ” she added @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with regard to border security and with serving the American people , first .
But the rhetoric from Coqui is further evidence that the international community smells blood in the water , and they view America as ripe for the taking , should Democrats seize power in January , and it appears they will .
Biden , who has embraced the media ’ s crowning him as president-elect for the last several weeks , has already begun assembling a cabinet of globalist elites .
His current proposed cabinet is a who ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their failed policy positions .
Among them is former Obama Deputy National Security Advisor and swamp creature Antony Blinken , who has been linked to the role of Secretary of State .
Blinken is well-known for helping to look the other way as an estimated two million people entered the country illegally during the Obama administration .
Biden has also announced Alejandro Mayorkas could serve as the head of the Department of Homeland Security , The Washington Post reported .
GOP Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas quickly described Mayorkas as “ disqualified , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was “ found by Barack Obama ’ s Inspector General to be guilty of selling Green Cards to Chinese nationals on behalf of rich , democratic donors.
” Of course , a Biden administration has also announced former Secretary of State John Kerry would be going around manually ensuring your windows are energy-efficient and thus compliant with the Green New Deal as his climate czar .
That last bit was sarcasm , but you get the picture .
Biden apparently intends to assemble a dream team cabinet of lifelong establishment relics who are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the border and internationally .
The swamp creatures have waited for a day when President Trump ’ s four years of policies which restored American dignity and sovereignty could come to a quick end .
The international community has taken notice of the 2020 election , and the message being received is apparently that the border will soon be open , and the country will be akin to an unlocked cash register at a bodega in Harlem .
Acting Customs and Border Commissioner Mark Morgan warned earlier this month that an end to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a migration crisis as tens of thousands of people would be likely to immediately converge on the border .
Now , Coqui is apparently feeling emboldened enough to tell Americans how to approach new policies with regard to a policy at the border .
Thousands of migrants are apparently waiting for the moment they ’ re cleared to begin heading northward .
Meanwhile , there is still no signal from pro-lockdown Biden that his presidency would mean America would be open for business for American workers or families .
But apparently , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who wish to enter illegally and the opportunity to take American jobs amid an American jobs crisis .
Never mind the pandemic fear-mongering , adding more people who can ’ t be vetted as not being potential health or security risks makes us safer , we have to conclude .
Biden certainly hasn ’ t disavowed the comments from Coqui .
Not to worry , though .
Biden assured NBC News this week that if certified as the election winner , his term in office would not equate to a third Obama term @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about Biden over the last five decades , it ’ s that he never stretches the truth .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

With Democratic Joe Biden viewed as the presumed president-elect more than three weeks after the still-contested Nov. 3 election, those seeking to enter the country illegally are likely feeling emboldened to soon overwhelm the country’s immigration system.
They’re certainly not being discouraged to do so by Mexico’s ambassador to the U.S.
Despite the inroads the country has made the last four years with regard to border security and enforcement under President Donald Trump, the thought of a Democrat in the White House has border security opponents salivating.
Mexican Ambassador Martha Bárcena Coqui, when speaking at a forum for immigration last week, encouraged an official pivot on immigration that would see American border policy more or less revert back to the days of former President Barack Obama.
Addressing the National Immigration Forum on Nov. 17, the ambassador advocated for an immigration policy that offers mass amnesty, more asylum protections and an influx of foreign refugees. She even brushed off the notion that an open border is a national security issue.
Telling the forum that America’s immigration system must “be based on facts and realities,” Coqui said the country must embrace an immigration stance based on “generosity.”
“The facts and realities is the need to protect the most vulnerable, the need to keep open the generosity towards refugees, the need to recognize the complementarity of labor markets and demographic profiles, the need for temporary workers in the United States,” she stated.
It’s not clear how such a generous new immigration policy would benefit Americans struggling with a crime wave, unprecedented division and the loss of millions of jobs amid a once-in-a-century pandemic.
Do you think Biden will be inaugurated on Jan. 20? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 23% (399 Votes) No: 77% (1361 Votes)
But that didn’t stop the diplomat from advising the country on how it should handle millions of illegal immigrants already here, and what she hopes happens, she said she’d like to see more enter the country in the years to come.
“If you conceptualize migration as a national security issue, if you [push for] securitization of migration, and what is even worse, if you criminalize migration, then your approach always be policing, contentious [and] reduction of migration,” Coqui said.
Coqui concluded Americans must accept unchecked migration from Mexico and Central America, as it is “an economic and social and political phenomena.”
“What we would like to see, of course, is that the U.S. embassies in Central America could process even more of these requests for asylum, instead of having people crossing through Mexico and asking for asylum at the border,” she added.
We all know Democrats are weak with regard to border security and with serving the American people, first.
But the rhetoric from Coqui is further evidence that the international community smells blood in the water, and they view America as ripe for the taking, should Democrats seize power in January, and it appears they will.
Biden, who has embraced the media’s crowning him as president-elect for the last several weeks, has already begun assembling a cabinet of globalist elites.
His current proposed cabinet is a who’s who of recycled Obama era officials and their failed policy positions.
Among them is former Obama Deputy National Security Advisor and swamp creature Antony Blinken, who has been linked to the role of Secretary of State.
Blinken is well-known for helping to look the other way as an estimated two million people entered the country illegally during the Obama administration.
Biden has also announced Alejandro Mayorkas could serve as the head of the Department of Homeland Security, The Washington Post reported.
GOP Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas quickly described Mayorkas as “disqualified,” this past week, noting he was “found by Barack Obama’s Inspector General to be guilty of selling Green Cards to Chinese nationals on behalf of rich, democratic donors.”
Alejandro Mayorkas was found by Barack Obama’s Inspector General to be guilty of selling Green Cards to Chinese nationals on behalf of rich, democratic donors. He is disqualified from leading the Department of Homeland Security. pic.twitter.com/8XsPdvn30G — Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) November 25, 2020
Of course, a Biden administration has also announced former Secretary of State John Kerry would be going around manually ensuring your windows are energy-efficient and thus compliant with the Green New Deal as his climate czar.
That last bit was sarcasm, but you get the picture.
Biden apparently intends to assemble a dream team cabinet of lifelong establishment relics who are likely to wave a white flag at the border and internationally.
The swamp creatures have waited for a day when President Trump’s four years of policies which restored American dignity and sovereignty could come to a quick end.
The international community has taken notice of the 2020 election, and the message being received is apparently that the border will soon be open, and the country will be akin to an unlocked cash register at a bodega in Harlem.
Acting Customs and Border Commissioner Mark Morgan warned earlier this month that an end to Trump’s immigration policies would create a migration crisis as tens of thousands of people would be likely to immediately converge on the border.
Now, Coqui is apparently feeling emboldened enough to tell Americans how to approach new policies with regard to a policy at the border.
Thousands of migrants are apparently waiting for the moment they’re cleared to begin heading northward.
Meanwhile, there is still no signal from pro-lockdown Biden that his presidency would mean America would be open for business for American workers or families.
But apparently, the country would be open for all those who wish to enter illegally and the opportunity to take American jobs amid an American jobs crisis.
Never mind the pandemic fear-mongering, adding more people who can’t be vetted as not being potential health or security risks makes us safer, we have to conclude.
Biden certainly hasn’t disavowed the comments from Coqui.
Not to worry, though.
Biden assured NBC News this week that if certified as the election winner, his term in office would not equate to a third Obama term.
If we’ve learned anything about Biden over the last five decades, it’s that he never stretches the truth.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-11-29--Dem Senators Give Us a Preview of What a Nationwide Mask Mandate Could Look Like with New Bill

Can the president or Congress declare a nationwide mask mandate ?
Two Senate Democrats would like to find out .
Sens .
Edward Markey of Massachusetts and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut introduced the “ Encouraging Masks for All Act of 2020 ” on Wednesday , according to Forbes .
The bill would make $ 5 billion in federal funds , directed through the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund , available to the states via grants contingent on their having a program that encourages the wearing of masks in all public spaces .
Lacking only a tortuous name that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this is pretty much everything you ’ d expect from legislation designed to make quick headlines but that isn ’ t going to pass the Senate as the majority Republican body currently constituted .
This includes the usual groan-worthy pro forma statements from Sens .
Markey and Blumenthal .
“ Masks and face coverings are the essential public health tool to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic , ” Markey said in a news release with the ambitious headline : “ Senators Markey and Blumenthal Announced National Face Mask Mandate Legislation.
” TRENDING @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nevada , Look What She Says Was Listed as a Home Address for Some Voters “ As President-elect Biden recognizes , we need to use every technique available to us to encourage mask use , from clear communication of the need for masks , to providing masks to those who need them , to leading by example , and even to mandating mask use nationwide .
Our legislation would move us closer to goal of ensuring universal mask adoption during these dangerous winter months .
It would also ensure that essential workers in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ settings all over the country are protected with face masks .
Mask up !
” He demands it !
With an exclamation point !
If I could have formulated a less effective pitch for Americans who are recalcitrant about wearing masks , I don ’ t think I could have come up with anything more thuddingly terrible than how Markey ended his statement .
Blumenthal , meanwhile , said in the release that “ [ e ] ven with a vaccine , mask wearing is an essential tool in conquering COVID-19 , along @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public health steps .
This bill gives states the resources to encourage mask wearing in public and outdoors , to provide masks to those who need them , and to enforce mask mandates to protect public health.
” In terms of providing “ resources to encourage mask wearing in public and outdoors , ” it actually does very little of that , providing $ 75 million to states to promote mask wearing .
What it does is provide $ 5 billion to states as a very big carrot to adopt mask mandates , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is of questionable efficacy and constitutionality — and , if Joe Biden takes office on Jan. 20 , 2021 , it ’ d be an unpopular bill to throw political capital toward passing .
Beyond the fact that the first major study of mask protection from COVID-19 , DANMASK-19 , yielded inconclusive results , a nationwide mask mandate still remains a thorny issue with those yet unpersuaded to wear a face covering .
The 15 states Markey and Blumenthal are targeting with their legislation are all generally Republican-leaning ( only two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joe Biden , and those have mask mandates for state employees ) .
They are mostly large and in the South , Midwest or Great Plains .
In short , this isn ’ t a particularly easy area for Washington bureaucrats to make people believe they ’ re doing everyone a favor by interfering , no matter what the science may be .
The heavy hand of Congress , when decidedly unwelcome , always tends to provoke not just resentment but resistance — particularly when it comes to practically unenforceable edicts like mask @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the constitutionality of such measures .
Because of the expansive powers given to Congress under the Commerce Clause — which stipulates Congress can “ regulate Commerce .
.
.
among the several States ” — federal lawmakers could likely mandate or disburse funds based on which states have enacted legislation requiring masks to be worn in places of business .
All public places , however , would be a much trickier matter .
The legislation even calls for masks to be made mandatory on federal property .
Along with being bad news for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doesn ’ t like wearing a mask in the halls of Congress , that ’ s also going to be a thorny legal issue .
RELATED : Dem-Run City Defunds Police By $ 150 Million , Reaches Highest Homicide Rate in Over a Decade And then there ’ s the ability to get the legislation passed in the first place .
If the Republicans win one or both seats in the January Senate runoffs , they have the sheer numbers to vote down the legislation .
Even assuming several moderate Republicans voted for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problem of the filibuster .
While Democrats have floated doing away with the practice , which necessitates a 60-vote majority to pass legislation , it seems unlikely a $ 5 billion grant program designed to force states into adopting mask protocols is going to be where they plant their flag and say they ’ ll move no more .
Such a bill could be included in the federal budget and pass with a 50-vote margin via budget reconciliation , but that ’ s a long way off .
Nevertheless , it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ likely see from a prospective Biden administration .
On the campaign trail , Biden said he could and would issue a nationwide mask mandate via executive order , stating in September that “ [ o ] ur legal team thinks I can do that , based upon the degree to which there ’ s a crisis in those states , and how bad things are for the country.
” Whether Biden realized this would be unworkable politically or his legal team suddenly stopped thinking he could do that , Biden ’ s backed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , instead focusing on a hard sell of Republican governors and , failing that , mayors and county officials within those states , according to CNN .
That ’ s about the extent he can get away with right now , no matter what Sens .
Markey and Blumenthal might think .
Anything beyond that and things will get ugly — no matter how often we get the senator from Massachusetts imploring us all to “ [ m ] ask up !
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Can the president or Congress declare a nationwide mask mandate? Two Senate Democrats would like to find out.
Sens. Edward Markey of Massachusetts and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut introduced the “Encouraging Masks for All Act of 2020” on Wednesday, according to Forbes.
The bill would make $5 billion in federal funds, directed through the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund, available to the states via grants contingent on their having a program that encourages the wearing of masks in all public spaces.
Lacking only a tortuous name that can be easily turned into an acronym, this is pretty much everything you’d expect from legislation designed to make quick headlines but that isn’t going to pass the Senate as the majority Republican body currently constituted. This includes the usual groan-worthy pro forma statements from Sens. Markey and Blumenthal.
“Masks and face coverings are the essential public health tool to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic,” Markey said in a news release with the ambitious headline: “Senators Markey and Blumenthal Announced National Face Mask Mandate Legislation.”
“As President-elect Biden recognizes, we need to use every technique available to us to encourage mask use, from clear communication of the need for masks, to providing masks to those who need them, to leading by example, and even to mandating mask use nationwide. Our legislation would move us closer to goal of ensuring universal mask adoption during these dangerous winter months. It would also ensure that essential workers in transit, health care, and retail settings all over the country are protected with face masks. Mask up!”
He demands it! With an exclamation point! If I could have formulated a less effective pitch for Americans who are recalcitrant about wearing masks, I don’t think I could have come up with anything more thuddingly terrible than how Markey ended his statement.
Blumenthal, meanwhile, said in the release that “[e]ven with a vaccine, mask wearing is an essential tool in conquering COVID-19, along with physical distancing and other common sense public health steps. This bill gives states the resources to encourage mask wearing in public and outdoors, to provide masks to those who need them, and to enforce mask mandates to protect public health.”
In terms of providing “resources to encourage mask wearing in public and outdoors,” it actually does very little of that, providing $75 million to states to promote mask wearing. What it does is provide $5 billion to states as a very big carrot to adopt mask mandates, no matter what their situation may be. This is of questionable efficacy and constitutionality — and, if Joe Biden takes office on Jan. 20, 2021, it’d be an unpopular bill to throw political capital toward passing.
Would you accept a national mask mandate? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 2% (24 Votes) No: 98% (1098 Votes)
Beyond the fact that the first major study of mask protection from COVID-19, DANMASK-19, yielded inconclusive results, a nationwide mask mandate still remains a thorny issue with those yet unpersuaded to wear a face covering.
The 15 states Markey and Blumenthal are targeting with their legislation are all generally Republican-leaning (only two, Arizona and Georgia, went for Joe Biden, and those have mask mandates for state employees). They are mostly large and in the South, Midwest or Great Plains. In short, this isn’t a particularly easy area for Washington bureaucrats to make people believe they’re doing everyone a favor by interfering, no matter what the science may be.
The heavy hand of Congress, when decidedly unwelcome, always tends to provoke not just resentment but resistance — particularly when it comes to practically unenforceable edicts like mask mandates.
There are also issues regarding the constitutionality of such measures. Because of the expansive powers given to Congress under the Commerce Clause — which stipulates Congress can “regulate Commerce . . . among the several States” — federal lawmakers could likely mandate or disburse funds based on which states have enacted legislation requiring masks to be worn in places of business. All public places, however, would be a much trickier matter.
The legislation even calls for masks to be made mandatory on federal property. Along with being bad news for California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who apparently doesn’t like wearing a mask in the halls of Congress, that’s also going to be a thorny legal issue.
And then there’s the ability to get the legislation passed in the first place. If the Republicans win one or both seats in the January Senate runoffs, they have the sheer numbers to vote down the legislation. Even assuming several moderate Republicans voted for it, there’s still the problem of the filibuster.
While Democrats have floated doing away with the practice, which necessitates a 60-vote majority to pass legislation, it seems unlikely a $5 billion grant program designed to force states into adopting mask protocols is going to be where they plant their flag and say they’ll move no more. Such a bill could be included in the federal budget and pass with a 50-vote margin via budget reconciliation, but that’s a long way off.
Nevertheless, it’s a preview of what we’ll likely see from a prospective Biden administration.
On the campaign trail, Biden said he could and would issue a nationwide mask mandate via executive order, stating in September that “[o]ur legal team thinks I can do that, based upon the degree to which there’s a crisis in those states, and how bad things are for the country.”
Whether Biden realized this would be unworkable politically or his legal team suddenly stopped thinking he could do that, Biden’s backed off that kind of language since then, instead focusing on a hard sell of Republican governors and, failing that, mayors and county officials within those states, according to CNN.
That’s about the extent he can get away with right now, no matter what Sens. Markey and Blumenthal might think.
Anything beyond that and things will get ugly — no matter how often we get the senator from Massachusetts imploring us all to “[m]ask up!”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-11-29--Actor Who Played Darth Vader, Dave Prowse, Dead at Age 85

Dave Prowse , the British weightlifter-turned-actor who was the body , though not the voice , of arch-villain Darth Vader in the original “ Star Wars ” trilogy , has died .
He was 85 .
Prowse died Saturday after a short illness , his agent Thomas Bowington said Sunday .
Born in Bristol , southwest England , in 1935 , Prowse was a three-time British weightlifting champion and represented England in weightlifting at the 1962 Commonwealth Games before breaking into movies with roles that emphasized his commanding size , including Frankenstein ’ s monster in a pair of Hammer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ saw Prowse in a small part in “ A Clockwork Orange ” and asked the 6-foot-6-inch ( almost 2-meter ) actor to audition for the villainous Vader or the Wookie Chewbacca in “ Star Wars.
” Prowse later told the BBC he chose Darth Vader because “ you always remember the bad guys.
” TRENDING : Punk Slugs Cop Out of the Blue , Officer Opens Cruiser Door and Lets 'Lee ' Handle Him Physically , Prowse was perfect for the part .
His lilting English West Country accent was considered less ideal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ James Earl Jones .
Prowse donned Darth Vader ’ s black armor and helmet for “ Star Wars ” ( 1977 ) , “ The Empire Strikes Back ” ( 1980 ) and “ Return of the Jedi ” ( 1983 ) .
He expressed some regret that , thanks to Vader ’ s mask , “ I can walk around with complete anonymity.
” “ All actors crave recognition and I ’ d like to have some like Luke Skywalker and Han Solo , ” he told The Associated Press in 1980 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Prowse also worked as a trainer for other actors , helping Christopher Reeve prepare to be the Man of Steel in hit 1978 film “ Superman.
” Prowse was also known to a generation of British children as the Green Cross Code Man , a superhero in a series of road safety advertisements during the 1970s and ’ 80s .
He was a regular at “ Star Wars ” fan events , but was banned from official conventions by Lucas in 2010 after the pair fell out .
Mark Hamill , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wars ” films , tweeted that Prowse was “ a kind man & much more than Darth Vader.
” Hamill said the actor “ loved his fans as much as they loved him .
# RIP ” “ Ant-Man ” director Edgar Wright also paid tribute to Prowse on Twitter .
“ As a kid Dave Prowse couldn ’ t be more famous to me ; stalking along corridors as evil incarnate in the part of Darth Vader & stopping a whole generation of kiddies from being mown down in street as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrote .
“ Rest in Peace , Bristol ’ s finest.
” Prowse is survived by his wife Norma and their three children .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Dave Prowse, the British weightlifter-turned-actor who was the body, though not the voice, of arch-villain Darth Vader in the original “Star Wars” trilogy, has died. He was 85.
Prowse died Saturday after a short illness, his agent Thomas Bowington said Sunday.
Born in Bristol, southwest England, in 1935, Prowse was a three-time British weightlifting champion and represented England in weightlifting at the 1962 Commonwealth Games before breaking into movies with roles that emphasized his commanding size, including Frankenstein’s monster in a pair of Hammer Studios horror films.
Director George Lucas saw Prowse in a small part in “A Clockwork Orange” and asked the 6-foot-6-inch (almost 2-meter) actor to audition for the villainous Vader or the Wookie Chewbacca in “Star Wars.”
Prowse later told the BBC he chose Darth Vader because “you always remember the bad guys.”
Physically, Prowse was perfect for the part. His lilting English West Country accent was considered less ideal, and his lines were dubbed by James Earl Jones.
Prowse donned Darth Vader’s black armor and helmet for “Star Wars” (1977), “The Empire Strikes Back” (1980) and “Return of the Jedi” (1983).
He expressed some regret that, thanks to Vader’s mask, “I can walk around with complete anonymity.”
“All actors crave recognition and I’d like to have some like Luke Skywalker and Han Solo,” he told The Associated Press in 1980. “Fortune tends to follow fame.”
Prowse also worked as a trainer for other actors, helping Christopher Reeve prepare to be the Man of Steel in hit 1978 film “Superman.”
Prowse was also known to a generation of British children as the Green Cross Code Man, a superhero in a series of road safety advertisements during the 1970s and ’80s.
He was a regular at “Star Wars” fan events, but was banned from official conventions by Lucas in 2010 after the pair fell out.
Mark Hamill, who played Luke Skywalker in the “Star Wars” films, tweeted that Prowse was “a kind man & much more than Darth Vader.”
Hamill said the actor “loved his fans as much as they loved him. #RIP”
“Ant-Man” director Edgar Wright also paid tribute to Prowse on Twitter.
“As a kid Dave Prowse couldn’t be more famous to me; stalking along corridors as evil incarnate in the part of Darth Vader & stopping a whole generation of kiddies from being mown down in street as the Green Cross Code man,” he wrote. “Rest in Peace, Bristol’s finest.”
Prowse is survived by his wife Norma and their three children.
The Western Journal has reviewed this Associated Press story and may have altered it prior to publication to ensure that it meets our editorial standards.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-01--Melania Trump Unveils Spectacular Patriotic White House Christmas Decorations

The White House is paying tribute to the spirit of America and its everyday heroes in this year ’ s Christmas decorations , which were unveiled on Monday by first lady Melania Trump .
“ I am excited to announce this year ’ s White House holiday theme , ‘ America the Beautiful , ’ ” she said , according to a White House statement .
“ Over the past four years I have had the honor to travel to some of our nation ’ s most beautiful landmarks and meet some of the most compassionate and patriotic American citizens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bond that all Americans share is an appreciation for our traditions , values , and history , which were the inspiration behind the decorations this year , ” she said .
“ Thank you to all of the staff and volunteers who worked to make sure the People ’ s House was ready for the holiday season .
Wishing everyone a Merry Christmas and a happy and healthy New Year.
” The East Wing of the White House features the Gold Star Family Tree .
“ Draped in blue , the color of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to our American heroes and their families who walk beside them in service .
This year , families who decorated the tree placed the name of their fallen family member on ribbon that will adorn the tree , ” the White House statement said .
Along the East Colonnade , the White House included a piece of each state and territory with urns holding foliage representing all of the nation ’ s official trees .
The White House library honors the 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment and displays winning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lady ’ s 19th Amendment child art competition .
“ The East Room trees are hung with classic American vehicles , such as the Ford pickup truck , the Jeep , and the CAT dump truck , ” wrote Amber Athey for The Spectator .
The White House statement noted that transportation and the East Room have been connected for more than a century .
“ In a 1909 ceremony in this room , President William Taft recognized Wilbur and Orville Wright for their unprecedented achievements in aerodynamics .
As a country , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power of possibility , fueling the next chapter of our history at sea , on land , in skies , and beyond , ” the statement said .
“ The real showstopper is the over-18-foot-tall official Christmas tree in the Blue Room .
It is massive , ” Athey wrote .
The tree is decorated in children ’ s art .
“ Students across the country were asked to artistically depict what makes their state beautiful by highlighting the people , places , and things that capture the spirit of the state in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the branches , their mini masterpieces collectively showcase America , the beautiful , ” the White House statement said .
“ The gleaming tree , bedecked with rays of yellow and gold , unites us in our common goal of building a brighter future for America ’ s children , aligning closely with First Lady Melania Trump ’ s ‘ Be Best ’ initiative which focuses on giving all children the best opportunity to succeed in life.
” In this time of COVID-19 , it would be hard to avoid a mention of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nation .
The White House decorations in the Red Room “ salute America ’ s everyday heroes who serve as first responders and frontline workers .
Handmade ornaments highlight the many professionals and volunteers who serve their communities with a spirit of generosity.
” Athey noted that the final part of the media tour of the decorations was one of its best moments .
“ On the way out of the White House , visitors are greeted by the Marine band responsible for the lovely Christmas carols that floated down the halls during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not to feel touched by the Christmas spirit after such a display , ” she wrote .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

The White House paid tribute to the spirit of America and its everyday heroes in 2020’s Christmas decorations, which were unveiled on Nov. 30 last year by then-first lady Melania Trump.
“I am excited to announce this year’s White House holiday theme, ‘America the Beautiful,’” she said, according to a White House statement.
“Over the past four years I have had the honor to travel to some of our nation’s most beautiful landmarks and meet some of the most compassionate and patriotic American citizens. From coast to coast, the bond that all Americans share is an appreciation for our traditions, values, and history, which were the inspiration behind the decorations this year,” she said.
“Thank you to all of the staff and volunteers who worked to make sure the People’s House was ready for the holiday season. Wishing everyone a Merry Christmas and a happy and healthy New Year.”
During this special time of the year, I am delighted to share “America the Beautiful” and pay tribute to the majesty of our great Nation. Together, we celebrate this land we are all proud to call home. #WHChristmas pic.twitter.com/fdZmB3rdXL — Melania Trump (@FLOTUS) November 30, 2020
The East Wing of the White House featured the Gold Star Family Tree.
“Draped in blue, the color of perseverance and justice, it pays tribute to our American heroes and their families who walk beside them in service. This year, families who decorated the tree placed the name of their fallen family member on ribbon that will adorn the tree,” the White House statement said.
Along the East Colonnade, the White House included a piece of each state and territory with urns holding foliage representing all of the nation’s official trees.
Are these decorations a fitting salute to Christmas and America? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 99% (2421 Votes) No: 1% (16 Votes)
The White House library honored the 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment and displayed winning pieces of artwork submitted to the first lady’s 19th Amendment child art competition.
“The East Room trees are hung with classic American vehicles, such as the Ford pickup truck, the Jeep, and the CAT dump truck,” wrote Amber Athey for The Spectator.
The White House statement noted that transportation and the East Room have been connected for more than a century.
“In a 1909 ceremony in this room, President William Taft recognized Wilbur and Orville Wright for their unprecedented achievements in aerodynamics. As a country, we proudly commend those who embrace the power of possibility, fueling the next chapter of our history at sea, on land, in skies, and beyond,” the statement said.
“The real showstopper is the over-18-foot-tall official Christmas tree in the Blue Room. It is massive,” Athey wrote.
The tree was decorated in children’s art.
“Students across the country were asked to artistically depict what makes their state beautiful by highlighting the people, places, and things that capture the spirit of the state in which they call home. Glistening on the branches, their mini masterpieces collectively showcase America, the beautiful,” the White House statement said.
“The gleaming tree, bedecked with rays of yellow and gold, unites us in our common goal of building a brighter future for America’s children, aligning closely with First Lady Melania Trump’s ‘Be Best’ initiative which focuses on giving all children the best opportunity to succeed in life.”
In this time of COVID-19, it would be hard to avoid a mention of the impact of the pandemic on the nation.
The White House decorations in the Red Room “salute[d] America’s everyday heroes who serve as first responders and frontline workers. Handmade ornaments highlight the many professionals and volunteers who serve their communities with a spirit of generosity.”
Athey noted that the final part of the media tour of the decorations was one of its best moments.
“On the way out of the White House, visitors are greeted by the Marine band responsible for the lovely Christmas carols that floated down the halls during the tour. It’s hard not to feel touched by the Christmas spirit after such a display,” she wrote.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-11-30--WWII Vet Recreates Tear-Jerking Photo with an Old Friend

Mr. George “ Bunny ” Avery , a 98-year-old military veteran from Birmingham , England , has lived quite a life .
From 1942 to 1947 he was in the British Army , a Sapper in the Royal Engineers .
He served in several countries , including Greece , Palestine and Italy .
Four years ago , the D-Day hero was honored with the French Légion d ’ Honneur award for his involvement in liberating France .
In 1944 , when he was 23 , he spent time in Peer , Belgium , building Bailey bridges , and was in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ several others , including a young Belgian boy .
And last November , the veteran got the reunion of a lifetime when he was able to take a photo in the same spot , with the same person from the photo that had been taken 75 years prior .
It was all made possible by Avery ’ s daughter , 55-year-old Kathryn Balmford , whose sleuthing paid off in a big way .
Last year , Balmford came across a different photo she hadn ’ t seen before .
Old , black-and-white , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a tin her father had kept on his person during his time abroad .
Flipping the photo over , she noticed an address , which prompted her to reach out to a friend in that area .
“ I spoke to a friend in Belgium about the address and he said , ‘ Let me see if I can do some investigations , ' ” she told the Daily Mail .
“ He managed to find someone from a historical society in Peer .
“ The lady there managed to track down the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up a meeting between dad and Urbain , who was then a little boy.
” She said her father had spent a lot of time playing with the local kids , as he ’ d been the second-oldest of nine children .
In his later years he ’ s struggled with dementia , so he did not remember Urbain — but he did remember the bakery .
“ Dad said , ‘ Yes I remember staying in the bakery ’ and he remembered the street clearly , ” she said .
“ Bearing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ places and had seen some terrible things throughout the war , this bakery really stood out in his mind.
” While Avery may not have remembered him , Urbain brought a little piece of history with him that proved their connection .
He brought the black-and-white photo that showed a group standing outside the bakery , in which he and Avery were featured .
Marveling over the print , Kathryn made sure to snap a photo of the two in the same spot they ’ d stood 75 years ago .
“ We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is still a bakery and Urbain , who was the little boy [ in the image ] , had this photograph with him , ” she said .
“ It was incredibly emotional , particularly for Urbain who remembered dad well.
” “ We spent the whole day with [ Urbain ] and they talked and held hands .
It was just incredible.
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Mr. George “Bunny” Avery, a 98-year-old military veteran from Birmingham, England, has lived quite a life. From 1942 to 1947 he was in the British Army, a Sapper in the Royal Engineers.
He served in several countries, including Greece, Palestine and Italy.
Four years ago, the D-Day hero was honored with the French Légion d’Honneur award for his involvement in liberating France.
In 1944, when he was 23, he spent time in Peer, Belgium, building Bailey bridges, and was in a photo taken outside a bakery with several others, including a young Belgian boy.
And last November, the veteran got the reunion of a lifetime when he was able to take a photo in the same spot, with the same person from the photo that had been taken 75 years prior.
It was all made possible by Avery’s daughter, 55-year-old Kathryn Balmford, whose sleuthing paid off in a big way.
Last year, Balmford came across a different photo she hadn’t seen before. Old, black-and-white, of a bakery — tucked away in a tin her father had kept on his person during his time abroad.
Flipping the photo over, she noticed an address, which prompted her to reach out to a friend in that area.
“I spoke to a friend in Belgium about the address and he said, ‘Let me see if I can do some investigations,'” she told the Daily Mail. “He managed to find someone from a historical society in Peer.
“The lady there managed to track down the family from the bakery and we set up a meeting between dad and Urbain, who was then a little boy.”
She said her father had spent a lot of time playing with the local kids, as he’d been the second-oldest of nine children. In his later years he’s struggled with dementia, so he did not remember Urbain — but he did remember the bakery.
“Dad said, ‘Yes I remember staying in the bakery’ and he remembered the street clearly,” she said. “Bearing in mind he had stayed in many places and had seen some terrible things throughout the war, this bakery really stood out in his mind.”
While Avery may not have remembered him, Urbain brought a little piece of history with him that proved their connection.
He brought the black-and-white photo that showed a group standing outside the bakery, in which he and Avery were featured.
Marveling over the print, Kathryn made sure to snap a photo of the two in the same spot they’d stood 75 years ago.
“We met last year in Peer outside what is still a bakery and Urbain, who was the little boy [in the image], had this photograph with him,” she said.
“It was incredibly emotional, particularly for Urbain who remembered dad well.”
“We spent the whole day with [Urbain] and they talked and held hands. It was just incredible.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-11-30--Op-Ed: Kamala Can’t Claim To Support Small Businesses After Helping Violent Criminals Back Onto the

Op-Ed: Kamala Can’t Claim To Support Small Businesses After Helping Violent Criminals Back Onto the Street

This weekend , presumptive vice president-elect Kamala Harris tweeted out her supposed “ solidarity ” with small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic .
“ Small businesses , especially Black and minority-owned businesses , urgently need relief to survive the effects of coronavirus this winter .
@ JoeBiden and I are committed to helping these businesses during this pandemic and get them the support they need to thrive in years to come , ” she tweeted .
This is cringe-inducing when one remembers Harris ’ twisted efforts this summer to aid the radical Minnesota Freedom Fund to bail out rioters and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In fact , it was this deceptive “ Freedom Fund ” that paved the way for a twice-convicted sex offender to be released in July .
For juxtaposition , here ’ s what Harris tweeted in June .
“ If you ’ re able to , chip in now to the @ MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.
” I am both fascinated and disturbed by this mantra that somehow riots that caused the destruction of thousands of companies were “ mostly peaceful protests.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that nearly 1,500 businesses had been “ heavily damaged ” in Minneapolis and St. Paul .
An Aug. 12 NPR headline declared , “ Riots That Followed Anti-Racism Protests Come At Great Cost To Black-Owned Businesses.
” The Daily Wire noted that the damage in Minnesota would “ cost insurance companies up to $ 2 billion , making [ the riots ] the most expensive incident in insurance history.
” So , where was the noble Kamala Harris when the small businesses of this nation were being torched by radical antifa scoundrels ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ she ’ s always done .
She was lying to get elected to yet another political office .
This time to one of the highest .
In 2010 , it was Harris , then the San Francisco district attorney , who was lambasted by a judge for failing to speak out about a negligent police lab technician who was stealing narcotics .
Harris intentionally hid information pertaining to the case from prosecutors — resulting in 600 cases being thrown out .
In 2014 , Harris took an ardent stance against the release of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would lose an important labor pool , ” in the words of the Los Angeles Times .
RELATED : Victor Davis Hanson : If Trump Is Playing Politics with COVID , It Does n't Hold a Candle to What Dems Have Done Evidently , most of these inmates had been arrested for marijuana-related offenses .
But since cannabis is the hot issue for the progressive left , it is only fitting that she would have a “ commitment to decriminalizing marijuana and expunging the records of people who have been convicted of marijuana @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been beneficial for the thousands of Californians with dime bags who were forced into prison cells because of her policies .
In 2015 , Harris opposed efforts to make her office investigate shootings that involved officers .
She was also against body cameras being worn .
Of course , the presumptive VP-elect has conveniently become an ostentatious Black Lives Matter truther in the past year , or so , highlighting another instance of a swift opportunity to gain popularity with the voters .
During this presidential election , Harris has flip-flopped on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ changed her stance on fracking .
In a 2019 CNN town hall , Harris said , “ There ’ s no question I ’ m in favor of banning fracking.
” By the time the presidential election came around , Biden and Harris were still speaking out against fracking in speeches across the country .
They had been independently for years .
But then it backfired .
Because , evidently , this is a profession that employs millions and millions of hardworking Americans .
Harris eventually backtracked on that position before the election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” - on not banning fracking .
Now we are supposed to believe Harris is “ committed ” to helping small businesses .
If this is the case , it lacks evidence or substance — and contradicts the entire trajectory of her career .
Harris has demonstrated a ridiculous lack of moral fortitude throughout her career , specifically in partaking in the release of the antifa clowns who had good fun ruining people ’ s small business for nights on end .
Consider the facts .
Is this a politician committed to anything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website .
If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal , you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

This weekend, presumptive vice president-elect Kamala Harris tweeted out her supposed “solidarity” with small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Small businesses, especially Black and minority-owned businesses, urgently need relief to survive the effects of coronavirus this winter. @JoeBiden and I are committed to helping these businesses during this pandemic and get them the support they need to thrive in years to come,” she tweeted.
Small businesses, especially Black and minority-owned businesses, urgently need relief to survive the effects of coronavirus this winter. @JoeBiden and I are committed to helping these businesses during this pandemic and get them the support they need to thrive in years to come. — Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) November 28, 2020
This is cringe-inducing when one remembers Harris’ twisted efforts this summer to aid the radical Minnesota Freedom Fund to bail out rioters and looters who terrorized these very same businesses. In fact, it was this deceptive “Freedom Fund” that paved the way for a twice-convicted sex offender to be released in July. For juxtaposition, here’s what Harris tweeted in June.
“If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.”
If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota. https://t.co/t8LXowKIbw — Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) June 1, 2020
I am both fascinated and disturbed by this mantra that somehow riots that caused the destruction of thousands of companies were “mostly peaceful protests.”
Do you think Kamala Harris actually cares about small businesses? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 0% (1 Votes) No: 100% (280 Votes)
By Aug. 31, it was reported that nearly 1,500 businesses had been “heavily damaged” in Minneapolis and St. Paul. An Aug. 12 NPR headline declared, “Riots That Followed Anti-Racism Protests Come At Great Cost To Black-Owned Businesses.” The Daily Wire noted that the damage in Minnesota would “cost insurance companies up to $2 billion, making [the riots] the most expensive incident in insurance history.”
So, where was the noble Kamala Harris when the small businesses of this nation were being torched by radical antifa scoundrels? Simple. She was just doing what she’s always done.
She was lying to get elected to yet another political office. This time to one of the highest.
In 2010, it was Harris, then the San Francisco district attorney, who was lambasted by a judge for failing to speak out about a negligent police lab technician who was stealing narcotics. Harris intentionally hid information pertaining to the case from prosecutors — resulting in 600 cases being thrown out.
In 2014, Harris took an ardent stance against the release of nonviolent criminals — noting that “prisons would lose an important labor pool,” in the words of the Los Angeles Times.
Evidently, most of these inmates had been arrested for marijuana-related offenses. But since cannabis is the hot issue for the progressive left, it is only fitting that she would have a “commitment to decriminalizing marijuana and expunging the records of people who have been convicted of marijuana offenses.”
This “commitment” would have been beneficial for the thousands of Californians with dime bags who were forced into prison cells because of her policies.
In 2015, Harris opposed efforts to make her office investigate shootings that involved officers. She was also against body cameras being worn. Of course, the presumptive VP-elect has conveniently become an ostentatious Black Lives Matter truther in the past year, or so, highlighting another instance of a swift opportunity to gain popularity with the voters.
During this presidential election, Harris has flip-flopped on numerous issues. Most notably, she changed her stance on fracking. In a 2019 CNN town hall, Harris said, “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.”
By the time the presidential election came around, Biden and Harris were still speaking out against fracking in speeches across the country. They had been independently for years.
But then it backfired. Because, evidently, this is a profession that employs millions and millions of hardworking Americans. Harris eventually backtracked on that position before the election, saying she and Biden “aligned”- on not banning fracking.
Now we are supposed to believe Harris is “committed” to helping small businesses. If this is the case, it lacks evidence or substance — and contradicts the entire trajectory of her career.
Harris has demonstrated a ridiculous lack of moral fortitude throughout her career, specifically in partaking in the release of the antifa clowns who had good fun ruining people’s small businesses for nights on end.
Consider the facts. Is this a politician committed to anything but her own self-interest?
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-11-30--Report: New Orleans Saints Hit with Massive Fine, Draft Penalty for Celebrating Without Masks

The National Football League issued a massive fine to the New Orleans Saints over the weekend in its latest attempt to stay controversial and relevant .
On Nov. 8 , Saints players celebrated their 38-3 victory over the Tampa Bay Buccaneers without masks on in the team locker room , resulting in a $ 500,000 fine , ESPN reported .
In addition , the team was also stripped of its seventh-round pick for next season ’ s draft .
A video from Saints wide receiver Tre ’ quan Smith posted on Instagram showed players celebrating their big win by playing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
On Nov. 3 , the NFL sent out updated COVID-19 protocols to all teams , according to ESPN .
“ All players and staff must wear masks or double-layered gaiters in the locker room on gameday — prior to the game , during halftime , and post-game , ” the memo stated .
“ It was actions in the video with unmasked players in the locker room after the game , ” a league source told ESPN ’ s Mike Triplett .
“ The team also had previous violations and was provided @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in escalated discipline.
” Ian Rapoport of the NFL Network suggested that the league issuing fines for coronavirus slip-ups is now common , and that the Saints are not the first team to deal with this .
“ The # Saints were also found to have conducted a mask-less meeting , along with being repeat offenders .
The # Patriots fine of $ 350K is the same as the # Titans from earlier in the season , ” Rapoport tweeted .
Perhaps it ’ s just my anger from Deflategate talking ( # @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the NFL seems excessive .
The penalty , which is being appealed by the Saints , neglects one important detail .
NFL players are tested every day with the exception of game day .
Plenty of players have tested positive for the virus , but it is typically caught before the game .
RELATED : LeBron James More Outraged Over Defense of American Flag Than Death of Democracy Notably , there was an incident in August when 77 players tested positive , but it was later determined that they were all false @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Saints are the first team to celebrate like this after winning — they just happened to be the ones that were caught on video , and the NFL jumped at the chance to show how “ woke ” it is by following confusing and at-times backward safety protocols .
Realistically , these massive fines to teams are likely nothing more than a cash grab and publicity stunt from the NFL to stay relevant .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

The National Football League issued a massive fine to the New Orleans Saints over the weekend in its latest attempt to stay controversial and relevant.
On Nov. 8, Saints players celebrated their 38-3 victory over the Tampa Bay Buccaneers without masks on in the team locker room, resulting in a $500,000 fine, ESPN reported.
In addition, the team was also stripped of its seventh-round pick for next season’s draft.
A video from Saints wide receiver Tre’quan Smith posted on Instagram showed players celebrating their big win by playing music and dancing in the locker room.
On Nov. 3, the NFL sent out updated COVID-19 protocols to all teams, according to ESPN.
“All players and staff must wear masks or double-layered gaiters in the locker room on gameday — prior to the game, during halftime, and post-game,” the memo stated.
“It was actions in the video with unmasked players in the locker room after the game,” a league source told ESPN’s Mike Triplett. “The team also had previous violations and was provided ample warning that further actions would result in escalated discipline.”
Ian Rapoport of the NFL Network suggested that the league issuing fines for coronavirus slip-ups is now common, and that the Saints are not the first team to deal with this.
“The #Saints were also found to have conducted a mask-less meeting, along with being repeat offenders. The #Patriots fine of $350K is the same as the #Titans from earlier in the season,” Rapoport tweeted.
Should the New Orleans Saints get fined? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 29% (80 Votes) No: 71% (196 Votes)
Two notes:
— The #Saints were also found to have conducted a mask-less meeting, along with being repeat offenders.
— The #Patriots fine of $350K is the same as the #Titans from earlier in the season. https://t.co/HxfQkuFVO0 — Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) November 29, 2020
Perhaps it’s just my anger from Deflategate talking (#FreeBrady), but this massive fine from the NFL seems excessive.
The penalty, which is being appealed by the Saints, neglects one important detail.
NFL players are tested every day with the exception of game day. Plenty of players have tested positive for the virus, but it is typically caught before the game.
Notably, there was an incident in August when 77 players tested positive, but it was later determined that they were all false positives.
77 NFL players tested positive for the coronavirus. All of them were false positives. So how many people in America have tested positive but never actually had Covid? Most people don’t have the resources to get their tests double checked. — Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) August 24, 2020
It’s unlikely that the Saints are the first team to celebrate like this after winning — they just happened to be the ones that were caught on video, and the NFL jumped at the chance to show how “woke” it is by following confusing and at-times backward safety protocols.
Realistically, these massive fines to teams are likely nothing more than a cash grab and publicity stunt from the NFL to stay relevant.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-11-30--NYC Pub Takes Stand Against Cuomo, Makes Epic Move Against COVID Lockdowns

Two New York City businessmen have taken a page from the leftist playbook for defying government , and have declared their pub an “ autonomous zone ” in order to keep its doors open .
The New York Post reported Staten Island ’ s Mac ’ s Public House is open , which is in defiance of public health orders to partially close down amid a resurgence of reported infections amid the coronavirus pandemic .
Mac ’ s Public House is located in New York ’ s South Shore area , which was deemed an orange zone by Gov .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Emmy Award recipient for his “ leadership ” during the pandemic , declared the area to be zoned orange this past week .
According to New York City ’ s website , orange is bad — meaning “ restaurants , bars , cafes and other food service establishments can provide outdoor dining and takeout and delivery service only.
” Orange also means a “ four-person maximum per table , ” while “ No indoor dining is allowed.
” But Mac ’ s Public House co-owners Danny Presti and Keith McAlarney told the Post @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doors to their business .
Taking a cue from Seattle ’ s leftist Capital Hill neighborhood occupiers from this past summer , the two men declared the establishment an “ autonomous zone.
” That seemed to work out for Seattle ’ s CHAZ/CHOP anarchists and other leftists , as they were allowed by Seattle Democrats to operate under their own rules for roughly a month .
But Mac ’ s is a peaceful independent nation/pub , and freedom is on the menu , as are reasonably priced cheese-filled jalapeño poppers .
And unlike @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and McAlarney don ’ t seem intent on committing any egregious crimes .
They apparently just hope to avoid becoming financially destitute .
They ’ re fighting leftists like the left , adopting a “ come and get me ” approach to protesting perceived injustice .
RELATED : Biden Contradicts His Entire Stance on COVID in 1 Interview So far , the men have been hit with thousands of dollars in fines and have had their business liquor license revoked .
Neither man seems particularly afraid of the city , or its fines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a video on YouTube to update patrons on the status of their business .
They ’ re offering free food and drinks to guests in return for donations — apparently seeking to take advantage of a loophole which would potentially make them no longer a business , so long as they don ’ t receive cash directly for goods and service .
But the city expects them to pay dearly with fines .
On the issue of the mounting fines , Presti didn ’ t seem too concerned “ At this point , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because we ’ re not paying it , ” he said .
“ [ The Sheriff ’ s Department ] is issuing us $ 1,000 fines , so they keep coming back .
We ’ re still here .
We ’ re not letting them in , ” he added .
McAlarney , citing private property laws in a YouTube video , was quite clear that Mac ’ s Public House will remain open .
“ We ’ re not backing down .
You think you scared me by … saying I don @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serve liquor now ?
Well guess what ?
That liquor license is on the wall .
If that liquor license is going to come off the wall , it ’ s going to be done by Cuomo , ” McAlarney said .
“ You want to come down here and pull that license off the wall ?
” the man taunted Cuomo .
McAlarney also appeared to refer to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio as “ de Bozo.
” In a video appeal to the mayor , McAlarney said , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and we ’ ll end up having a conversation before you even think about stepping foot on my property .
I will not back down.
” New Yorkers have been hit hard by not only the coronavirus pandemic , but by their Democratic leadership ’ s overreaction to it .
The proprietors of Mac ’ s Public House aren ’ t giving in to the city ’ s demands — not with regard to locking up and going home .
Democrats have officially become so anti-small-business that opening up your doors to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Staten Island .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Two New York City businessmen have taken a page from the leftist playbook for defying government, and have declared their pub an “autonomous zone” in order to keep its doors open.
The New York Post reported Staten Island’s Mac’s Public House is open, which is in defiance of public health orders to partially close down amid a resurgence of reported infections amid the coronavirus pandemic.
Mac’s Public House is located in New York’s South Shore area, which was deemed an orange zone by Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Cuomo, a recent Emmy Award recipient for his “leadership” during the pandemic, declared the area to be zoned orange this past week.
According to New York City’s website, orange is bad — meaning “restaurants, bars, cafes and other food service establishments can provide outdoor dining and takeout and delivery service only.”
Orange also means a “four-person maximum per table,” while “No indoor dining is allowed.”
But Mac’s Public House co-owners Danny Presti and Keith McAlarney told the Post they won’t be closing the doors to their business.
Taking a cue from Seattle’s leftist Capital Hill neighborhood occupiers from this past summer, the two men declared the establishment an “autonomous zone.”
That seemed to work out for Seattle’s CHAZ/CHOP anarchists and other leftists, as they were allowed by Seattle Democrats to operate under their own rules for roughly a month.
Would you close down your business if ordered to by the government? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 5% (44 Votes) No: 95% (889 Votes)
There were sadly multiple causalities.
But Mac’s is a peaceful independent nation/pub, and freedom is on the menu, as are reasonably priced cheese-filled jalapeño poppers.
And unlike the former leaders of CHOP, Presti and McAlarney don’t seem intent on committing any egregious crimes.
They apparently just hope to avoid becoming financially destitute.
They’re fighting leftists like the left, adopting a “come and get me” approach to protesting perceived injustice.
So far, the men have been hit with thousands of dollars in fines and have had their business liquor license revoked.
Neither man seems particularly afraid of the city, or its fines, though.
The men have posted a video on YouTube to update patrons on the status of their business.
They’re offering free food and drinks to guests in return for donations — apparently seeking to take advantage of a loophole which would potentially make them no longer a business, so long as they don’t receive cash directly for goods and service.
But the city expects them to pay dearly with fines.
On the issue of the mounting fines, Presti didn’t seem too concerned
“At this point, we’re OK with it, because we’re not paying it,” he said.
“[The Sheriff’s Department] is issuing us $1,000 fines, so they keep coming back. We’re still here. We’re not letting them in,” he added.
McAlarney, citing private property laws in a YouTube video, was quite clear that Mac’s Public House will remain open.
“We’re not backing down. You think you scared me by … saying I don’t have a license now to serve liquor now? Well guess what? That liquor license is on the wall. If that liquor license is going to come off the wall, it’s going to be done by Cuomo,” McAlarney said.
“You want to come down here and pull that license off the wall?” the man taunted Cuomo.
McAlarney also appeared to refer to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio as “de Bozo.”
In a video appeal to the mayor, McAlarney said, “Feel free to end up coming down, and we’ll end up having a conversation before you even think about stepping foot on my property. I will not back down.”
New Yorkers have been hit hard by not only the coronavirus pandemic, but by their Democratic leadership’s overreaction to it.
The proprietors of Mac’s Public House aren’t giving in to the city’s demands — not with regard to locking up and going home.
Democrats have officially become so anti-small-business that opening up your doors to customers is now officially a crime in Staten Island.
McAlarney and Presti aren’t playing along.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-11-30--China’s New Stealth Bomber Could Bring Hawaii Into Striking Distance

China is developing a stealth bomber that would be capable of striking parts of the United States , a troubling prospect given the rising tensions between the two nations .
The H-20 bomber , which has been on the radar of the United States for months now , is expected to have a 5,280-mile striking range , putting Hawaii and the U.S. territory of Guam within its reach .
The U.S. Defense Department ’ s 2020 China Military Power Report gives insight into China ’ s aviation ambitions .
“ A number of reports suggest the new bomber , likely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the next decade with the following features : a stealthy design , employing many fifth-generation technologies ; a likely range of at least 8,500 km ; a payload of at least 10 metric tons ; and a capability to employ both conventional and nuclear weaponry , ” the DoD said in August .
A new report from the Royal United Services Institute , a United Kingdom-based think tank , makes it clear that the bomber would have significant power , according to the South China Morning Post .
“ Armed with nuclear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would represent a major break from previous People ’ s Liberation Army Air Force doctrine and equipment development practice , ” said the RUSI report , released in late October .
This is a major change for the Chinese People ’ s Liberation Army , which currently is only truly able to defend against and attack nations in Asia and islands in the Pacific Ocean , such as the Philippines and Japan .
“ The H-20 , by contrast , would give China a truly intercontinental power-projection capability , ” the report said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has raised concerns about China ’ s growing military power and how it is quickly becoming the nation ’ s largest adversary .
The report from the DOD makes it clear the communist juggernaut wants to best the United States in military prowess by 2049 .
“ Two decades later , the PLA ’ s objective is to become a ‘ world-class ’ military by the end of 2049 — a goal first announced by General Secretary Xi Jinping in 2017 , ” it said .
“ Although the CCP has not defined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , within the context of the PRC ’ s national strategy it is likely that Beijing will seek to develop a military by mid-century that is equal to — or in some cases superior to — the U.S. military , or that of any other great power that the PRC views as a threat.
” Tensions between the United States and China have soured since March , mostly because of the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic that originated there , the intense scrutiny over Uyghur Muslims being placed in forced labor camps @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on freedom protests in Hong Kong .
RELATED : Despite Obsessively Flagging Trump 's Posts , Twitter Silent as China Claims COVID Did n't Start in Wuhan As a result , the U.S. government sanctioned the communist nation by enacting the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act and the Hong Kong Autonomy Act .
The Trump administration also announced sanctions on Chinese companies that use slave labor .
China is poised to become the nation ’ s greatest enemy since the Soviet Union , so military developments such as a new stealth bomber should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Donald Trump has taken a tough approach to China after trying to negotiate trade deals with the global rival , it is unclear how Democrat Joe Biden ’ s administration would respond to the growing threat .
China plays an integral role in the global economy , so the United States needs the right leaders to navigate this rocky chapter in foreign policy .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

China is developing a stealth bomber that would be capable of striking parts of the United States, a troubling prospect given the rising tensions between the two nations.
The H-20 bomber, which has been on the radar of the United States for months now, is expected to have a 5,280-mile striking range, putting Hawaii and the U.S. territory of Guam within its reach.
The U.S. Defense Department’s 2020 China Military Power Report gives insight into China’s aviation ambitions.
“A number of reports suggest the new bomber, likely named the H-20, could debut sometime in the next decade with the following features: a stealthy design, employing many fifth-generation technologies; a likely range of at least 8,500 km; a payload of at least 10 metric tons; and a capability to employ both conventional and nuclear weaponry,” the DoD said in August.
A new report from the Royal United Services Institute, a United Kingdom-based think tank, makes it clear that the bomber would have significant power, according to the South China Morning Post.
“Armed with nuclear and conventional stand-off missiles, the H-20 would represent a major break from previous People’s Liberation Army Air Force doctrine and equipment development practice,” said the RUSI report, released in late October.
This is a major change for the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, which currently is only truly able to defend against and attack nations in Asia and islands in the Pacific Ocean, such as the Philippines and Japan.
“The H-20, by contrast, would give China a truly intercontinental power-projection capability,” the report said.
China’s H-20 stealth bomber will give PLA ‘truly intercontinental’ strike capacity, says report https://t.co/07icYQH4nx — SCMP News (@SCMPNews) November 26, 2020
This news comes as the Pentagon has raised concerns about China’s growing military power and how it is quickly becoming the nation’s largest adversary.
The report from the DOD makes it clear the communist juggernaut wants to best the United States in military prowess by 2049.
“Two decades later, the PLA’s objective is to become a ‘world-class’ military by the end of 2049 — a goal first announced by General Secretary Xi Jinping in 2017,” it said. “Although the CCP has not defined what a ‘world-class’ military means, within the context of the PRC’s national strategy it is likely that Beijing will seek to develop a military by mid-century that is equal to — or in some cases superior to — the U.S. military, or that of any other great power that the PRC views as a threat.”
Tensions between the United States and China have soured since March, mostly because of the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic that originated there, the intense scrutiny over Uyghur Muslims being placed in forced labor camps, and the government’s crackdown on freedom protests in Hong Kong.
Do you think Joe Biden would be tough on China? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 1% (3 Votes) No: 99% (248 Votes)
As a result, the U.S. government sanctioned the communist nation by enacting the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act and the Hong Kong Autonomy Act. The Trump administration also announced sanctions on Chinese companies that use slave labor.
China is poised to become the nation’s greatest enemy since the Soviet Union, so military developments such as a new stealth bomber should not be taken lightly.
While President Donald Trump has taken a tough approach to China after trying to negotiate trade deals with the global rival, it is unclear how Democrat Joe Biden’s administration would respond to the growing threat.
China plays an integral role in the global economy, so the United States needs the right leaders to navigate this rocky chapter in foreign policy.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.