westernjournal--2020-12-11--Multiple Businesses Linked to Gavin Newsom Received Unusually Large Federal Pandemic Loans

Eight companies owned in part by California Gov .
Gavin Newsom received almost $ 3 million in loans from the Paycheck Protection Program , according to a new report .
According to a report from KGO-TV , when the station analyzed Small Business Administration data , it found that several businesses that are part of the PlumpJack Group received PPP loans .
Although the report noted that Newsom placed his ownership interests in the business into a blind trust , he remains publicly listed as the group ’ s founder .
His sister , Hilary Newsom , is listed as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Partners Limited Partnership , linked to the PlumpJack winery in Napa , received a loan for $ 918,720 on April 14 .
According to SBA data , 14 employees were retained through the funding .
“ It ’ s unexpected for a 14-employee organization to get nearly $ 1 million , ” said Sean Moulton , a senior policy analyst with Project on Government Oversight .
“ The purpose behind this program was to save entry-level jobs , people going in and working on that paycheck .
That was what we put this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Erin Burke , who owns the Millbrae Pancake House , said something seems off because under the terms of its PPP loan , her restaurant received $ 431,400 and retained 53 employees .
“ That seems unfair because there are small family businesses like ours that need that money , ” Burke said .
An official with the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce said most businesses felt they did not get enough through the PPP process .
“ I think it ’ s heartbreaking , ” said Jay Cheng , the chamber @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We see huge discrepancies between small business and the kind of loans they got and their ability to get loans and larger companies that are well-resourced and well-staffed and had strong relationships with their banks.
” Another company affiliated with the PlumpJack Group , Balboa Café Partners LP , received a $ 506,799 loan on April 29 .
“ A commercial data firm estimated in June 2020 that Balboa Café Partners employed seven individuals , but SBA data associated with their loan application states they retained 55 employees , ” KGO reported .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ station ’ s inquiries with a statement .
“ Like many other companies facing extreme financial duress during the pandemic , we used loan monies to protect our workers and keep them employed .
Our staff members and their loved ones have depended on these programs for their livelihoods .
Gavin Newsom is not affiliated with the operation of the companies in any way .
Any suggestion otherwise is unequivocally false , ” spokesperson Jeff Nead said .
KGO estimated that each of the 14 employees retained by Villa Encinal Partners would have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a year based on the size of the loan .
When it asked the company for payroll records , it received another statement from Nead .
RELATED : California Rolls Out COVID Tracking System That Uses Residents ' Smart Phones “ Plumpjack Management Group is operating within the federal guidelines created for COVID-19 SBA loan recipients .
These funds have been critical in keeping our staff employed and continuing our operations .
Any implication that we have done anything outside of the guidelines ( or that we have filed for forgiveness on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
If the company does apply to have the loan forgiven , “ they have to certify when they apply that they retained their employees , ” said Miryam Barajas , SBA Region 9 Communications Director .
“ That ’ s going to include payroll records , documentation filings , there ’ s a lot of proof that these businesses have to show proving they paid their employees.
” However , the PPP loans are still a sweet deal even if a company repays the money .
“ They were able to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the government was providing , ” said Danielle Brian , the executive director of the Project on Government Oversight .
“ These are one percent loans … it ’ s essentially free money for them.
” Small business owners said the process passed them by .
“ It seems as if a lot of the large companies were being taken care of by the banks first and the small guys like me were kind of left on the sidelines , ” small business owner Joe Field told KGO .
“ The entire process @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to figure it out yourself or get professional help , ” said Steve Mayer , an accountant and financial consultant .
“ The little guy , mom-and-pop people were completely passed over.
” “ If somebody ended up with close to $ 1 million and had 14 employees , the math just doesn ’ t work.
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Eight companies owned in part by California Gov. Gavin Newsom received almost $3 million in loans from the Paycheck Protection Program, according to a new report.
According to a report from KGO-TV, when the station analyzed Small Business Administration data, it found that several businesses that are part of the PlumpJack Group received PPP loans.
Although the report noted that Newsom placed his ownership interests in the business into a blind trust, he remains publicly listed as the group’s founder. His sister, Hilary Newsom, is listed as president.
The report said Villa Encinal Partners Limited Partnership, linked to the PlumpJack winery in Napa, received a loan for $918,720 on April 14. According to SBA data, 14 employees were retained through the funding.
“It’s unexpected for a 14-employee organization to get nearly $1 million,” said Sean Moulton, a senior policy analyst with Project on Government Oversight. “The purpose behind this program was to save entry-level jobs, people going in and working on that paycheck. That was what we put this out there for, to stop unemployment.”
Erin Burke, who owns the Millbrae Pancake House, said something seems off because under the terms of its PPP loan, her restaurant received $431,400 and retained 53 employees.
“That seems unfair because there are small family businesses like ours that need that money,” Burke said.
An official with the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce said most businesses felt they did not get enough through the PPP process.
Should these businesses have accepted the loans? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 7% (13 Votes) No: 93% (177 Votes)
“I think it’s heartbreaking,” said Jay Cheng, the chamber’s public policy director. “We see huge discrepancies between small business and the kind of loans they got and their ability to get loans and larger companies that are well-resourced and well-staffed and had strong relationships with their banks.”
Another company affiliated with the PlumpJack Group, Balboa Café Partners LP, received a $506,799 loan on April 29.
“A commercial data firm estimated in June 2020 that Balboa Café Partners employed seven individuals, but SBA data associated with their loan application states they retained 55 employees,” KGO reported.
The PlumpJack Management Group responded to the station’s inquiries with a statement.
“Like many other companies facing extreme financial duress during the pandemic, we used loan monies to protect our workers and keep them employed. Our staff members and their loved ones have depended on these programs for their livelihoods. Gavin Newsom is not affiliated with the operation of the companies in any way. Any suggestion otherwise is unequivocally false,” spokesperson Jeff Nead said.
KGO estimated that each of the 14 employees retained by Villa Encinal Partners would have had to be making about $160,000 a year based on the size of the loan. When it asked the company for payroll records, it received another statement from Nead.
“Plumpjack Management Group is operating within the federal guidelines created for COVID-19 SBA loan recipients. These funds have been critical in keeping our staff employed and continuing our operations. Any implication that we have done anything outside of the guidelines (or that we have filed for forgiveness on the loan) is irresponsible,” Nead said.
If the company does apply to have the loan forgiven, “they have to certify when they apply that they retained their employees,” said Miryam Barajas, SBA Region 9 Communications Director. “That’s going to include payroll records, documentation filings, there’s a lot of proof that these businesses have to show proving they paid their employees.”
However, the PPP loans are still a sweet deal even if a company repays the money.
“They were able to benefit from this extremely low interest rate the government was providing,” said Danielle Brian, the executive director of the Project on Government Oversight. “These are one percent loans … it’s essentially free money for them.”
Small business owners said the process passed them by.
“It seems as if a lot of the large companies were being taken care of by the banks first and the small guys like me were kind of left on the sidelines,” small business owner Joe Field told KGO.
“The entire process was a mess unless you were able to figure it out yourself or get professional help,” said Steve Mayer, an accountant and financial consultant. “The little guy, mom-and-pop people were completely passed over.”
“If somebody ended up with close to $1 million and had 14 employees, the math just doesn’t work.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-11--Netflix Slammed with Yet Another Lawsuit, Accused of Ignoring ‘Ethical and Legal Obligations’

Societal dependency on online streaming services such as Netflix may have increased , but the company ’ s growing influence has not shielded it from several high-profile controversies .
The most recent one involves a lawsuit filed against Netflix by the video game corporation Activision Blizzard accusing the streaming service of engaging in business practices without “ regard to its ethical and legal obligations.
” In a lawsuit obtained by Deadline , Activsion alleged that Netflix illegally poached its chief financial officer , Spencer Neumann , in 2018 .
“ To shape its workforce to its desires , Netflix not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it deems ‘ adequate , ’ but is engaged in a years-long campaign of unlawfully poaching executives from Netflix ’ s competitors regardless of their contractual obligations , ” the lawsuit reads .
According to the 13-page lawsuit , Netflix allegedly recruited Neumann just as Activision was “ negotiating with Netflix over a commercial partnership to distribute Activision ’ s linear media content.
” Netflix has faced lawsuits like this before from corporations such as Fox and ViacomCBS , with both companies taking legal action against the streaming service for similar accusations of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actions by claiming not to be bound by the state of California ’ s employment statutes , citing employee “ freedom ” against the “ Hollywood establishment.
” Attorneys for Activision refuted this in the complaint , writing , “ Netflix ’ s unlawful conduct is not trailblazing or innovative — it is just reflective of Netflix ’ s contempt for the law of the State of California.
” It should be noted Netflix ’ s expansion into creating feature films , according to TechCrunch , led to 24 Oscar nominations for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an honor that ’ s usually reserved for Hollywood studios .
In addition to some of the controversies happening behind the scenes , Netflix has also been subjected to backlash for streaming “ Cuties , ” a foreign film that many people felt was sexually exploitative of children .
The movie included close-up shots of underage girls in compromising positions , and one scene showed a young girl taking a picture of her genitalia .
Back in September , Netflix ’ s subscription cancellations reached a multi-year high in response to the streamer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , according to research YipitData shared with Variety magazine .
The content of “ Cuties ” was considered to be so graphic that a Texas grand jury indicted Netflix for promoting “ visual material which depicts the lewd exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of a clothed or partially clothed child who was younger than 18 years of age at the time the visual material was created.
” Debates about the film ’ s portrayal of minors even attracted the attention of several prominent politicians , such as Republican Sens .
Josh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Arkansas , as well as Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii .
RELATED : Major Credit Card Companies Cut Ties with Pornhub After Monetized Child Sex Abuse Comes to Light Hawley questioned in a tweet why Netflix would distribute a film that “ appears to sexually exploit children , ” and Cotton noted even if one categorizes the movie as “ social commentary , ” that wouldn ’ t excuse the “ real-life children performing extended , pornographic dance routines.
” Gabbard accused Netflix of being “ complicit ” in “ the child @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the fact that her friend ’ s 13-year-old daughter had been a victim of the practice .
However , in a Q & A at the virtual Mipcom conference in October , Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos defended the choice to promote “ Cuties , ” saying the movie was a “ coming-of-age film ” that had been “ misunderstood ” by American audiences .
Whether it ’ s on-screen or behind the scenes , Netflix appears to be unable to avoid controversy in 2020 .
We are committed to truth and accuracy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our editorial standards .

Societal dependency on online streaming services such as Netflix may have increased, but the company’s growing influence has not shielded it from several high-profile controversies.
The most recent one involves a lawsuit filed against Netflix by the video game corporation Activision Blizzard accusing the streaming service of engaging in business practices without “regard to its ethical and legal obligations.”
In a lawsuit obtained by Deadline, Activsion alleged that Netflix illegally poached its chief financial officer, Spencer Neumann, in 2018.
“To shape its workforce to its desires, Netflix not only ruthlessly fires its own employees that it deems ‘adequate,’ but is engaged in a years-long campaign of unlawfully poaching executives from Netflix’s competitors regardless of their contractual obligations,” the lawsuit reads.
According to the 13-page lawsuit, Netflix allegedly recruited Neumann just as Activision was “negotiating with Netflix over a commercial partnership to distribute Activision’s linear media content.”
Netflix has faced lawsuits like this before from corporations such as Fox and ViacomCBS, with both companies taking legal action against the streaming service for similar accusations of “executive snatching.”
Netflix justified its actions by claiming not to be bound by the state of California’s employment statutes, citing employee “freedom” against the “Hollywood establishment.”
Attorneys for Activision refuted this in the complaint, writing, “Netflix’s unlawful conduct is not trailblazing or innovative — it is just reflective of Netflix’s contempt for the law of the State of California.”
It should be noted Netflix’s expansion into creating feature films, according to TechCrunch, led to 24 Oscar nominations for the company at the 2019 awards show, an honor that’s usually reserved for Hollywood studios.
Is Netflix's behavior unethical? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 93% (75 Votes) No: 7% (6 Votes)
In addition to some of the controversies happening behind the scenes, Netflix has also been subjected to backlash for streaming “Cuties,” a foreign film that many people felt was sexually exploitative of children.
The movie included close-up shots of underage girls in compromising positions, and one scene showed a young girl taking a picture of her genitalia.
Back in September, Netflix’s subscription cancellations reached a multi-year high in response to the streamer’s decision to promote the film, according to research YipitData shared with Variety magazine.
The content of “Cuties” was considered to be so graphic that a Texas grand jury indicted Netflix for promoting “visual material which depicts the lewd exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of a clothed or partially clothed child who was younger than 18 years of age at the time the visual material was created.”
Debates about the film’s portrayal of minors even attracted the attention of several prominent politicians, such as Republican Sens. Josh Hawley of Missouri and Tom Cotton of Arkansas, as well as Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii.
.@Netflix should explain to the public why it is distributing a film, “Cuties,” that appears to sexually exploit children and endanger child welfare pic.twitter.com/OZH4HCLy0Y — Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) September 11, 2020
Claiming that ‘Cuties’ is “social commentary” doesn’t excuse the depiction of real-life children performing extended, pornographic dance routines. https://t.co/AQDVl634DU — Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) September 15, 2020
Hawley questioned in a tweet why Netflix would distribute a film that “appears to sexually exploit children,” and Cotton noted even if one categorizes the movie as “social commentary,” that wouldn’t excuse the “real-life children performing extended, pornographic dance routines.”
Gabbard accused Netflix of being “complicit” in “the child sex trafficking trade,” calling attention to the fact that her friend’s 13-year-old daughter had been a victim of the practice.
However, in a Q&A at the virtual Mipcom conference in October, Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos defended the choice to promote “Cuties,” saying the movie was a “coming-of-age film” that had been “misunderstood” by American audiences.
Whether it’s on-screen or behind the scenes, Netflix appears to be unable to avoid controversy in 2020.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-11--Food Network Star Has Perfect Response to Mommy Shamer

The world of social media has opened the floodgates for communication between people that might never actually meet in person .
The literal and figurative distance that creates means many people say things they might not if they were face to face .
But there are some people who are just a bit too helpful no matter what the context .
“ Mommy shaming ” isn ’ t a new thing , but the label and online variant has picked up speed in recent years .
Unless there ’ s a clear and immediate issue that needs to be addressed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of an even mildly critical nature are best left unspoken .
But there will always be “ that person , ” and this week , Food Network ’ s Katie Lee , who co-hosts “ The Kitchen , ” was the recipient of a comment she found rather judgmental .
TRENDING : State Lawmaker Who Called on 'Soldiers ' To Target 'Trumpers ' Gets Devastating News After Head of Legislature Sees Video Lee , 39 , and her husband , TV producer Ryan Biegel , welcomed Iris Marion Biegel into the world this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ IVF .
It seems , based on what Lee has shared , that motherhood suits her and she can ’ t get enough of her sweet Iris .
“ I want her as close as possible , ” she posted with a photo of her babywearing on Oct. 20 .
“ Wish I could hold her like this forever , ” she shared on Nov. 24 .
But there to rain on her baby-snuggling parade was a stranger whose concern perhaps outweighed their common sense .
And Lee responded head-on , sharing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Instagram Story following a Q & A session she had on Thursday , according to a photo obtained by People .
“ I ’ m sure you ’ ve been told this but it ’ s not good to hold Iris so much , ” the unnamed person wrote to Lee .
“ She needs time for her back/spine/stomach and muscles to develop… not a ‘ Karen ’ just trying to help.
” The smiley face tagged on at the end of the message did nothing to mitigate the mama bear response that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much ?
” Lee wrote .
“ Not to worry , my baby gets plenty of tummy time , activity time , etc.
” RELATED : Revealed : Dolly Parton Saved the Life of Child Actress While Filming New Christmas Movie According to many doctors , there ’ s no such thing as holding a baby “ too much ” while a parent is awake and alert .
ABC ’ s “ Good Morning America ” spoke with primary care pediatrician Dr. Edith Bracho-Sanchez , who said the snuggles are good for baby @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fussier than others , more colicky , more gassy or simply more used to being close to mom , ” she said .
“ Some moms and dads enjoy the snuggles and there ’ s absolutely nothing wrong with that.
” Other fans and followers reached out to Lee to reassure her and voice their support , messages which she did appreciate , and she ’ ll go right on cuddling that precious bundle of joy that she ’ s waited so long for .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ editorial standards .

The world of social media has opened the floodgates for communication between people that might never actually meet in person. The literal and figurative distance that creates means many people say things they might not if they were face to face.
But there are some people who are just a bit too helpful no matter what the context. “Mommy shaming” isn’t a new thing, but the label and online variant has picked up speed in recent years.
Unless there’s a clear and immediate issue that needs to be addressed, most of the time, comments of an even mildly critical nature are best left unspoken.
But there will always be “that person,” and this week, Food Network’s Katie Lee, who co-hosts “The Kitchen,” was the recipient of a comment she found rather judgmental.
Lee, 39, and her husband, TV producer Ryan Biegel, welcomed Iris Marion Biegel into the world this year after struggling with infertility and failed IVF.
It seems, based on what Lee has shared, that motherhood suits her and she can’t get enough of her sweet Iris.
“I want her as close as possible,” she posted with a photo of her babywearing on Oct. 20.
“Wish I could hold her like this forever,” she shared on Nov. 24.
But there to rain on her baby-snuggling parade was a stranger whose concern perhaps outweighed their common sense.
And Lee responded head-on, sharing the original message and her reply on her Instagram Story following a Q&A session she had on Thursday, according to a photo obtained by People.
“I’m sure you’ve been told this but it’s not good to hold Iris so much,” the unnamed person wrote to Lee. “She needs time for her back/spine/stomach and muscles to develop… not a ‘Karen’ just trying to help.”
The smiley face tagged on at the end of the message did nothing to mitigate the mama bear response that was coming.
“Mom shame, much?” Lee wrote. “Not to worry, my baby gets plenty of tummy time, activity time, etc.”
According to many doctors, there’s no such thing as holding a baby “too much” while a parent is awake and alert. ABC’s “Good Morning America” spoke with primary care pediatrician Dr. Edith Bracho-Sanchez, who said the snuggles are good for baby and parent.
“Some babies are fussier than others, more colicky, more gassy or simply more used to being close to mom,” she said. “Some moms and dads enjoy the snuggles and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that.”
Other fans and followers reached out to Lee to reassure her and voice their support, messages which she did appreciate, and she’ll go right on cuddling that precious bundle of joy that she’s waited so long for.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-11--NJ Gym Owner Has Been Fined Over $1.2 Million, Says Not a Single COVID Case Has Been Linked to the G

NJ Gym Owner Has Been Fined Over $1.2 Million, Says Not a Single COVID Case Has Been Linked to the Gym

You may remember Atilis Gym , a workout spot in Camden County , New Jersey , that has made headlines over the past few months due to owners Ian Smith and Frank Trumbetti ’ s refusal to comply with the government ’ s coronavirus orders .
In May , a gym-goer was arrested outside Atilis when he refused to give police his name .
In July , Smith and Trumbetti were arrested and charged with contempt , obstruction and violating a disaster control act .
A few days later , they reopened their gym , kicking down the plywood panels @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Despite the government ’ s best efforts , Atilis remains open — but racked up fines of over $ 1.2 million for their trouble , Smith told Fox News .
TRENDING : State Lawmaker Who Called on 'Soldiers ' To Target 'Trumpers ' Gets Devastating News After Head of Legislature Sees Video “ We open every single day .
Gov .
Murphy has thrown everything he possibly could to shut us down , ” Smith said .
“ He has arrested my partner and I.
He ’ s given us over 60 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He fines us $ 15,497.76 per day for every day that we ’ re in operation.
” $ 15,497.76 in fines a day , over $ 1.2 million total — and yet not a single case of the coronavirus has been connected to Atilis .
According to Smith , the gym sees approximately 500 to 700 visitors a day , for a total of over 83,000 visits since May .
While Atilis does utilize safety protocols like social distancing and proper sanitation , masks are not required .
Smith said less than one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mask while working out .
Despite the high traffic and lack of masks , there has been no coronavirus outbreak traced back to Atilis , Smith said .
That ’ s a pretty damning indictment of the necessity of both masks and lockdowns .
Nevertheless , Atilis , Smith and Trumbetti have been hit with over a million dollars in fines .
Hopefully , Smith and Trumbetti can serve as a beacon of hope to the rest of America , especially those who have similarly suffered from their businesses being forcibly shut down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to fight the lockdowns – especially in the face of such hefty fines – is commendable .
And they ’ re not done yet .
In addition to continually defying lockdown orders , Smith is working on a national directory of other businesses that are pushing back .
RELATED : Dan Crenshaw Goes to War with Pelosi on the House Floor , Says She 's 'Holding the American People Hostage' “ Think of it as a Yelp directory for businesses that are defying any and all COVID restrictions , ” Smith said on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” “ Whether that be complete shutdowns , arbitrary time limits on when they can and can not serve alcohol or when they can ’ t serve food.
” “ We ’ re going to hit that critical point where there ’ s too many businesses open to punish , and this whole thing will fall apart like a house of cards.
” Here ’ s hoping Smith and Trumbetti can keep up the good work without too much more government interference .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

You may remember Atilis Gym, a workout spot in Camden County, New Jersey, that has made headlines over the past few months due to owners Ian Smith and Frank Trumbetti’s refusal to comply with the government’s coronavirus orders.
In May, a gym-goer was arrested outside Atilis when he refused to give police his name.
In July, Smith and Trumbetti were arrested and charged with contempt, obstruction and violating a disaster control act.
A few days later, they reopened their gym, kicking down the plywood panels that had been placed across the entrance.
Despite the government’s best efforts, Atilis remains open — but racked up fines of over $1.2 million for their trouble, Smith told Fox News.
“We open every single day. Gov. Murphy has thrown everything he possibly could to shut us down,” Smith said. “He has arrested my partner and I. He’s given us over 60 citations, some of them criminal. He fines us $15,497.76 per day for every day that we’re in operation.”
$15,497.76 in fines a day, over $1.2 million total — and yet not a single case of the coronavirus has been connected to Atilis.
According to Smith, the gym sees approximately 500 to 700 visitors a day, for a total of over 83,000 visits since May.
While Atilis does utilize safety protocols like social distancing and proper sanitation, masks are not required. Smith said less than one percent of gym-goers opt to don a mask while working out.
Despite the high traffic and lack of masks, there has been no coronavirus outbreak traced back to Atilis, Smith said.
That’s a pretty damning indictment of the necessity of both masks and lockdowns.
Nevertheless, Atilis, Smith and Trumbetti have been hit with over a million dollars in fines.
Hopefully, Smith and Trumbetti can serve as a beacon of hope to the rest of America, especially those who have similarly suffered from their businesses being forcibly shut down. Their bravery and resilience in continuing to fight the lockdowns – especially in the face of such hefty fines – is commendable.
And they’re not done yet. In addition to continually defying lockdown orders, Smith is working on a national directory of other businesses that are pushing back.
“Think of it as a Yelp directory for businesses that are defying any and all COVID restrictions,” Smith said on FOX Business‘ “Varney and Co.” “Whether that be complete shutdowns, arbitrary time limits on when they can and cannot serve alcohol or when they can’t serve food.”
“We’re going to hit that critical point where there’s too many businesses open to punish, and this whole thing will fall apart like a house of cards.”
Here’s hoping Smith and Trumbetti can keep up the good work without too much more government interference.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-11--Pelosi Finally Breaks Silence on Swalwell Chinese Spy Scandal and Her Response Is Pathetic

No one can blame Republicans for feeling a sense of schadenfreude when the story about California Rep. Eric Swalwell ’ s relationship with a suspected Chinese spy broke on Tuesday .
The irony , after all , is rich .
Following a one-year investigation , Axios reported that a “ suspected Chinese intelligence operative ” named Christine Fang , or Fang Fang , “ developed extensive ties with local and national politicians , including a U.S. congressman , in what U.S. officials believe was a political intelligence operation run by China ’ s main civilian spy agency between 2011 and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fang “ targeted up-and-coming local politicians in the Bay Area and across the country who had the potential to make it big on the national stage.
” Swalwell has been one of President Donald Trump ’ s most vocal critics in the House of Representatives .
Swalwell , who serves on the House Intelligence Committee , has relentlessly attacked Trump for his supposed ties to the Russians throughout his presidency .
After Donald Trump Jr. ’ s infamous June 2016 meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya came to light , Swalwell pounced on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Swalwell himself has been caught in the headlights , House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tells reporters there ’ s nothing to see here .
“ I don ’ t have any concern about Mr. Swalwell , ” Pelosi said Thursday at her weekly news conference .
Well , she should have some concern about Swalwell .
Fang knew Swalwell well enough to be “ friends ” on Facebook with his father and brother .
( Fox News reported Wednesday that both Swalwell Sr. and Joshua Swalwell only stopped appearing on her “ friends ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ according to Axios , Fang “ helped place at least one intern in Swalwell ’ s office.
” That prompted Fox News ’ Chad Pergram to ask Pelosi if she believes that background checks should be required for all staff and interns .
She replied , “ I don ’ t know that it means that we have background checks for every intern who comes into the Capitol.
” RELATED : Rep. Swalwell Blames Trump for Report Detailing His Relationship with Suspected Chinese Spy At a time when the Chinese are trying to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our government , our financial system , our universities and our technology , doesn ’ t the role of a suspected Chinese spy in placing an intern at an office where exposure to sensitive information is all in a day ’ s work raise a red flag ?
If Swalwell were a Republican , Pelosi no doubt would have responded much differently .
Swalwell claims he had no idea Fang was a spy at the time of their relationship and that may be true .
But don ’ t we look to our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entrust with our government ’ s secrets , to exercise a certain level of discernment ?
I would expect a member of Congress to be a bit more thoughtful about this sort of thing .
Pelosi ’ s spokesman , Drew Hammill , said in a statement to Fox that “ The Speaker has full confidence in Congressman Swalwell ’ s service in the Congress and on the Intelligence Committee.
” Meanwhile , a Swalwell spokesperson said in a statement to Axios : “ Long ago , [ Swalwell ] provided information about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than eight years ago , and whom he hasn ’ t seen in nearly six years — to the FBI .
To protect information that might be classified , he will not participate in your story.
” And that was just about all they had to say on the subject .
So , neither the House speaker nor the congressman in question are at all concerned about this .
Well , Eric Swalwell is reaping what he has sown , and this scandal may be more difficult to dismiss than he or the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

No one can blame Republicans for feeling a sense of schadenfreude when the story about California Rep. Eric Swalwell’s relationship with a suspected Chinese spy broke on Tuesday.
The irony, after all, is rich.
Following a one-year investigation, Axios reported that a “suspected Chinese intelligence operative” named Christine Fang, or Fang Fang, “developed extensive ties with local and national politicians, including a U.S. congressman, in what U.S. officials believe was a political intelligence operation run by China’s main civilian spy agency between 2011 and 2015.”
That congressman was Eric Swalwell.
The Axios report indicated that Fang “targeted up-and-coming local politicians in the Bay Area and across the country who had the potential to make it big on the national stage.”
Swalwell has been one of President Donald Trump’s most vocal critics in the House of Representatives. Swalwell, who serves on the House Intelligence Committee, has relentlessly attacked Trump for his supposed ties to the Russians throughout his presidency. After Donald Trump Jr.’s infamous June 2016 meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya came to light, Swalwell pounced on him as well.
But now that Swalwell himself has been caught in the headlights, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tells reporters there’s nothing to see here.
“I don’t have any concern about Mr. Swalwell,” Pelosi said Thursday at her weekly news conference.
Nancy Pelosi: “I don’t have any concern about Mr. Swalwell”
pic.twitter.com/b8ILNqbR4s — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) December 10, 2020
Well, she should have some concern about Swalwell.
Fang knew Swalwell well enough to be “friends” on Facebook with his father and brother. (Fox News reported Wednesday that both Swalwell Sr. and Joshua Swalwell only stopped appearing on her “friends” list that day.)
And, according to Axios, Fang “helped place at least one intern in Swalwell’s office.”
That prompted Fox News’ Chad Pergram to ask Pelosi if she believes that background checks should be required for all staff and interns.
She replied, “I don’t know that it means that we have background checks for every intern who comes into the Capitol.”
At a time when the Chinese are trying to infiltrate almost every American institution, including our government, our financial system, our universities and our technology, doesn’t the role of a suspected Chinese spy in placing an intern at an office where exposure to sensitive information is all in a day’s work raise a red flag?
If Swalwell were a Republican, Pelosi no doubt would have responded much differently.
Swalwell claims he had no idea Fang was a spy at the time of their relationship and that may be true. But don’t we look to our elected officials, especially those whom we entrust with our government’s secrets, to exercise a certain level of discernment? I would expect a member of Congress to be a bit more thoughtful about this sort of thing.
Do you believe Swalwell should be removed from the House Intelligence Committee? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 100% (611 Votes) No: 0% (3 Votes)
Pelosi’s spokesman, Drew Hammill, said in a statement to Fox that “The Speaker has full confidence in Congressman Swalwell’s service in the Congress and on the Intelligence Committee.”
Meanwhile, a Swalwell spokesperson said in a statement to Axios: “Long ago, [Swalwell] provided information about this person — whom he met more than eight years ago, and whom he hasn’t seen in nearly six years — to the FBI. To protect information that might be classified, he will not participate in your story.”
And that was just about all they had to say on the subject.
So, neither the House speaker nor the congressman in question are at all concerned about this.
Well, Eric Swalwell is reaping what he has sown, and this scandal may be more difficult to dismiss than he or the speaker believes.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-10--Representative Announces He Will Propose Bill To Allow Texas To Secede from United States

Amid a contested presidential election , a toxic national political climate and threats to violate individual liberties from top Democrats , talk of secession is escalating .
Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh on Wednesday used a portion of his program to talk about a national breakup .
“ I actually think that we ’ re trending toward secession , ” Limbaugh stunningly said .
“ I see more and more people asking , ‘ What in the world do we have in common with the people who live in , say , New York ?
What is there that makes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us there to even have a chance at winning New York , ’ especially if you ’ re talking about votes , ” the host added .
Texas , which brags of being a former independent republic before it joined the union in 1845 , should walk away from the country and its dysfunctional ways , says a state representative from the Lone Star State ’ s Hill Country region .
Might we soon see amusement parks renamed to Seven Flags ?
Who knows for now , but # Texit is being revived @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the state capital in Austin .
State Rep. Kyle Biedermann , a Republican representing District 73 in the state House , wrote on Facebook Tuesday that he intends to introduce a bill allowing for a referendum on secession .
Biedermann blasted the federal government in a post calling for an independent Texas .
“ The federal government is out of control and does not represent the values of Texans , ” Biedermann wrote .
“ That is why I am committing to file legislation this session that will allow a referendum to give @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Texas to reassert its status as an independent nation.
” Biedermann wrote that a move to secede “ perfectly aligns ” with Article 1 Section 2 of the Texas Constitution .
“ All political power is inherent in the people , and all free governments are founded on their authority , and instituted for their benefit , ” that article reads .
“ The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government , and , subject to this limitation only , they have at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.
” The state representative then invoked the # Texit tag , which was popular for a short while some years ago online during the administration of former President Barack Obama — of which we might soon see a third term if Democrat Joe Biden is inaugurated .
If you ’ ve never visited Biedermann ’ s district , which covers Comal , Gillespie and Kendall counties in Texas , then you might not know the state lawmaker likely represents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hill country runs west of Austin and north and northwest of the major population center of San Antonio .
The residents of the unique region generally don ’ t align politically with people in New York ’ s five boroughs , as Limbaugh alluded to Wednesday .
RELATED : Trump Calls on 'Certain Very Important People ' To Help Him Win Election But would Biedermann and his fellow Texans really take such an extreme measure , such as promoting secession , to escape the madness in Washington ?
That remains to be seen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yet expounded on what he intends to propose in writing .
That could be because the next legislative session doesn ’ t begin until next month .
There are also serious legal questions that haven ’ t been answered about Texas waving goodbye to the blue states and their baggage .
In Texas v. White in 1869 , post-Civil War , the Supreme Court ruled that Texas entered an “ indestructible union ” upon admission into the United States , and therefore would remain part of the family .
It ’ s also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ board with such a drastic move .
While secession would technically be unlawful , so too , arguably , are the Democrats ’ plans for the country .
Should they take the White House and the GOP ’ s Senate majority next month , they ’ ve signaled it might be open season on the Constitution and the liberties of their political adversaries .
Perhaps Biedermann ’ s statement might simply be symbolic .
Democrats could feel less justified in enacting their radical agendas if half of those they intend to rule over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way from the table .
Maybe the threat of Texan secession , should it become widely popular , will help to keep a few people in Washington from feeling as if they hold all the cards .
In any event , secession proposals have grown more popular , and more serious , in recent years as the country ’ s political and cultural divide has deepened .
A number of Californians started an unsuccessful secession movement after President Donald Trump was inaugurated in 2017 .
The California Independence from the United States Initiative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” sought to declare the Golden State independent from the U.S .
While the movement went nowhere , it was shockingly popular .
Texans , led by Biedermann , might also discuss such a measure in the coming months .
Right now , Texas is leading the charge against questionable election results in other states .
The state , in a lawsuit filed this week , is asking the Supreme Court to mandate the battleground states of Georgia , Wisconsin , Michigan and Pennsylvania to change their slates of electors .
Texas has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its lawsuit .
If the idea of secession catches on in the Lone Star State , how long might it be before similar proposals are introduced in the legislatures of some of those other states that are backing Texas in the fight for election integrity ?
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Amid a contested presidential election, a toxic national political climate and threats to violate individual liberties from top Democrats, talk of secession is escalating.
Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh on Wednesday used a portion of his program to talk about a national breakup.
“I actually think that we’re trending toward secession,” Limbaugh stunningly said.
“I see more and more people asking, ‘What in the world do we have in common with the people who live in, say, New York? What is there that makes us believe that there is enough of us there to even have a chance at winning New York,’ especially if you’re talking about votes,” the host added.
Texas, which brags of being a former independent republic before it joined the union in 1845, should walk away from the country and its dysfunctional ways, says a state representative from the Lone Star State’s Hill Country region.
Might we soon see amusement parks renamed to Seven Flags? Who knows for now, but #Texit is being revived in the hills and valleys west of the state capital in Austin.
State Rep. Kyle Biedermann, a Republican representing District 73 in the state House, wrote on Facebook Tuesday that he intends to introduce a bill allowing for a referendum on secession. Biedermann blasted the federal government in a post calling for an independent Texas.
“The federal government is out of control and does not represent the values of Texans,” Biedermann wrote. “That is why I am committing to file legislation this session that will allow a referendum to give Texans a vote for the State of Texas to reassert its status as an independent nation.”
Biedermann wrote that a move to secede “perfectly aligns” with Article 1 Section 2 of the Texas Constitution.
“All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit,” that article reads. “The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.”
The state representative then invoked the #Texit tag, which was popular for a short while some years ago online during the administration of former President Barack Obama — of which we might soon see a third term if Democrat Joe Biden is inaugurated.
If you’ve never visited Biedermann’s district, which covers Comal, Gillespie and Kendall counties in Texas, then you might not know the state lawmaker likely represents his constituents quite well.
The Texas Hill country runs west of Austin and north and northwest of the major population center of San Antonio. The residents of the unique region generally don’t align politically with people in New York’s five boroughs, as Limbaugh alluded to Wednesday.
But would Biedermann and his fellow Texans really take such an extreme measure, such as promoting secession, to escape the madness in Washington? That remains to be seen.
KSAT-TV reported the lawmaker has not yet expounded on what he intends to propose in writing. That could be because the next legislative session doesn’t begin until next month.
There are also serious legal questions that haven’t been answered about Texas waving goodbye to the blue states and their baggage.
Would you support Texas seceding from the union? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 88% (1854 Votes) No: 12% (262 Votes)
In Texas v. White in 1869, post-Civil War, the Supreme Court ruled that Texas entered an “indestructible union” upon admission into the United States, and therefore would remain part of the family. It’s also unclear if other Texans would be on board with such a drastic move.
While secession would technically be unlawful, so too, arguably, are the Democrats’ plans for the country. Should they take the White House and the GOP’s Senate majority next month, they’ve signaled it might be open season on the Constitution and the liberties of their political adversaries.
Perhaps Biedermann’s statement might simply be symbolic.
Democrats could feel less justified in enacting their radical agendas if half of those they intend to rule over with an iron fist threaten to walk way from the table. Maybe the threat of Texan secession, should it become widely popular, will help to keep a few people in Washington from feeling as if they hold all the cards.
In any event, secession proposals have grown more popular, and more serious, in recent years as the country’s political and cultural divide has deepened.
A number of Californians started an unsuccessful secession movement after President Donald Trump was inaugurated in 2017. The California Independence from the United States Initiative, or the “Calexit Initiative,” sought to declare the Golden State independent from the U.S. While the movement went nowhere, it was shockingly popular.
Texans, led by Biedermann, might also discuss such a measure in the coming months. Right now, Texas is leading the charge against questionable election results in other states.
The state, in a lawsuit filed this week, is asking the Supreme Court to mandate the battleground states of Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to change their slates of electors. Texas has been joined by 17 other states in its lawsuit.
If the idea of secession catches on in the Lone Star State, how long might it be before similar proposals are introduced in the legislatures of some of those other states that are backing Texas in the fight for election integrity?
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-10--Revealed: Dolly Parton Saved the Life of Child Actress While Filming New Christmas Movie

Part of the holiday fun for many people is enjoying a selection of films , from romances to family favorites .
This year , “ Christmas on the Square ” featuring Dolly Parton will be played on many screens across the country .
The story follows along as an “ embittered ‘ Scrooge ’ of a woman plans to sell her small town , regardless of the consequences to the people who live there , ” according to IMDb .
Of course , Parton isn ’ t the grump — she plays an angel .
During the filming , though @ @ @ @ @ @ @ white and act the part .
She actually did save a life .
One of the young actresses on set was 9-year-old Talia Hill .
She and her brothers — Tristan , 16 , and Tyson , 13 — were all part of the cast .
Their mother Tonia Hill was an entertainer with Walt Disney World for 26 years , and has fostered their interest in the arts since before they were born .
She met their father , Travis Hill , at Disney , where he worked as an audio designer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say these kids were destined to follow in their parents ’ footsteps .
“ I have actually performed with all three of them when I was pregnant for each of them , in the early trimester so they were dancing right along with me , ” Tonia told Inside Edition .
“ She makes me grow as a dancer , ” Talia said .
“ She tells me if something doesn ’ t look good or if it is the wrong note.
” “ She gives us tips and tricks and how to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ helps , ” Tyson said .
During a break in filming , Talia decided to run for a quick cup of cocoa , and when the cast got called back she raced to get to her mark .
She didn ’ t see the car that was coming toward her , but thankfully , a guardian angel did , and yanked her out of the way of the oncoming vehicle .
“ I looked up and it was Dolly Parton , ” Talia said , “ and I was like , surprised , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” “ And she ’ s like , ‘ Well , I am an angel , you know.
’ Cause she plays an angel in the movie .
And I was in shock .
She hugged me and shook me and said , ‘ I saved your life ! '
” Obviously Tonia was grateful for Dolly ’ s intervention , and all of them had a story to take with them after filming was over .
They have nothing but positive things to say about her .
“ When you think of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ‘ It is Dolly Parton , ’ but when you actually see her you are like , ‘ Wow , it ’ s Dolly Parton , ’ being in her presence lifts you , ” Tristan said .
“ When Dolly walked in she smelled like heaven , ” Talia added .
“ She greeted everyone even if you were a trashcan person .
It was such a great feeling.
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Part of the holiday fun for many people is enjoying a selection of films, from romances to family favorites. This year, “Christmas on the Square” featuring Dolly Parton will be played on many screens across the country.
The story follows along as an “embittered ‘Scrooge’ of a woman plans to sell her small town, regardless of the consequences to the people who live there,” according to IMDb.
Of course, Parton isn’t the grump — she plays an angel.
During the filming, though, she did more than dress in white and act the part. She actually did save a life.
One of the young actresses on set was 9-year-old Talia Hill. She and her brothers — Tristan, 16, and Tyson, 13 — were all part of the cast.
Their mother Tonia Hill was an entertainer with Walt Disney World for 26 years, and has fostered their interest in the arts since before they were born. She met their father, Travis Hill, at Disney, where he worked as an audio designer, so it’s safe to say these kids were destined to follow in their parents’ footsteps.
“I have actually performed with all three of them when I was pregnant for each of them, in the early trimester so they were dancing right along with me,” Tonia told Inside Edition.
“She makes me grow as a dancer,” Talia said. “She tells me if something doesn’t look good or if it is the wrong note.”
“She gives us tips and tricks and how to make people feel something and it really helps,” Tyson said.
During a break in filming, Talia decided to run for a quick cup of cocoa, and when the cast got called back she raced to get to her mark. She didn’t see the car that was coming toward her, but thankfully, a guardian angel did, and yanked her out of the way of the oncoming vehicle.
“I looked up and it was Dolly Parton,” Talia said, “and I was like, surprised, I was like [gasp].”
“And she’s like, ‘Well, I am an angel, you know.’ Cause she plays an angel in the movie. And I was in shock. She hugged me and shook me and said, ‘I saved your life!'”
Obviously Tonia was grateful for Dolly’s intervention, and all of them had a story to take with them after filming was over. They have nothing but positive things to say about her.
“When you think of Dolly Parton, you are just like, ‘It is Dolly Parton,’ but when you actually see her you are like, ‘Wow, it’s Dolly Parton,’ being in her presence lifts you,” Tristan said.
“She is so amazing.”
“When Dolly walked in she smelled like heaven,” Talia added. “She greeted everyone even if you were a trashcan person. It was such a great feeling.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-10--US ‘Ally’ Offers Chinese Troops Training on North American Terrain, Trump’s DOD Puts an Immediate St

US ‘Ally’ Offers Chinese Troops Training on North American Terrain, Trump’s DOD Puts an Immediate Stop to It

Troops from China ’ s People ’ s Liberation Army would have had access to North American terrain and experts who are skilled at navigating the landscape thanks to a reckless U.S. ally .
Thankfully , the Pentagon put a stop to the training of an adversary ’ s military in our own backyard .
The plan to train Chinese soldiers was revealed after the Canadian outlet Rebel News made an information request to the Canadian government for records corroborating an April 2019 report in state-owned Russian media outlet Sputnik that claimed Canada had sent a delegation to an event @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s navy .
Nineteen months later , the Canadian government finally responded with a trove of redacted documents both confirming the delegation ’ s attendance and outlining planned PLA activities in Canada .
Although the documents contain sensitive military information , it appears censors tasked with redacting the classified information failed at blacking out most of the text .
Much of the released information is perfectly visible , despite being marked “ secret.
” The documents reveal plans for a training engagement between members of the PLA and the Canadian Armed Forces — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a small detachment at Canadian Forces Base Petawawa , Ontario , some 150 miles from the country ’ s border with New York state .
This training was planned for winter of 2019 , but “ paused ” after pressure from the United States .
“ The decision to pause the winter survival training was communicated to [ Global Affairs Canada ] at the [ director general ] level on the margins of the last Government of Canada DG China Committee , ” one ineffectively redacted secret email from January 2019 read .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cindy and Sarah Taylor that the [ Chief of the Defence Staff ] had decided to pause this training due to security concerns , including concerns that were discussed with the US.
” Another email from that same month had noted that the U.S. “ approach hs shifted under the Trump administration ] and that “ back in December [ 2018 ] [ Department of National Defence ] /CAF were keen to cancel the PLA ’ s participation in the winter survival training following the request from [ the U.S. Department of Defense @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any surprise that President Donald Trump ’ s administration didn ’ t take kindly to Chinese troops getting the lay of the land less than 200 miles from America ?
Potential but unscheduled engagements between Canadian and Chinese forces included high-level meetings on defense cooperation and military education .
These were planned to be offered to delegations of foreign soldiers led by high-level PLA officers .
Although the numbers of PLA troops allowed in would have been small , crucial information about operating in one of North America ’ s harshest conditions could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ soldiers training in China .
Canada ’ s inability to censor secret information also raises questions about the country ’ s chance at keeping sensitive information from falling into the hands of PLA agents .
RELATED : Pelosi Finally Breaks Silence on Swalwell Chinese Spy Scandal and Her Response Is Pathetic Even before China ’ s lies allowed a small outbreak of a novel coronavirus to burn across the globe earlier this year , there were plenty of reasons to distrust the People ’ s Republic .
From the ruling communist party ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threats of conquest against neighboring countries , it ’ s clear that it ’ s in nobody ’ s best interest to give the Chinese military a helping hand .
While Trump ’ s stance on halting communist China is clear , presumptive President-elect Joe Biden has historically taken a different approach to the Asian powerhouse .
After paving the way for a rising China , Biden now sits dangerously close to the presidency .
If left unchecked , there ’ s little doubt that China ’ s global ambitions will play out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Troops from China’s People’s Liberation Army would have had access to North American terrain and experts who are skilled at navigating the landscape thanks to a reckless U.S. ally.
Thankfully, the Pentagon put a stop to the training of an adversary’s military in our own backyard.
The plan to train Chinese soldiers was revealed after the Canadian outlet Rebel News made an information request to the Canadian government for records corroborating an April 2019 report in state-owned Russian media outlet Sputnik that claimed Canada had sent a delegation to an event celebrating the 70th anniversary of China’s navy.
Nineteen months later, the Canadian government finally responded with a trove of redacted documents both confirming the delegation’s attendance and outlining planned PLA activities in Canada.
Although the documents contain sensitive military information, it appears censors tasked with redacting the classified information failed at blacking out most of the text. Much of the released information is perfectly visible, despite being marked “secret.”
The documents reveal plans for a training engagement between members of the PLA and the Canadian Armed Forces — more specifically, winter survival training for a small detachment at Canadian Forces Base Petawawa, Ontario, some 150 miles from the country’s border with New York state.
This training was planned for winter of 2019, but “paused” after pressure from the United States.
“The decision to pause the winter survival training was communicated to [Global Affairs Canada] at the [director general] level on the margins of the last Government of Canada DG China Committee,” one ineffectively redacted secret email from January 2019 read.
“General [Derek] Joyce informed Cindy and Sarah Taylor that the [Chief of the Defence Staff] had decided to pause this training due to security concerns, including concerns that were discussed with the US.”
Do you think that American allies should be allowed to cooperate with the Chinese military? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 2% (10 Votes) No: 98% (579 Votes)
Another email from that same month had noted that the U.S. “approach hs shifted under the Trump administration] and that “back in December [2018] [Department of National Defence]/CAF were keen to cancel the PLA’s participation in the winter survival training following the request from [the U.S. Department of Defense] to do so.”
Is it any surprise that President Donald Trump’s administration didn’t take kindly to Chinese troops getting the lay of the land less than 200 miles from America?
Potential but unscheduled engagements between Canadian and Chinese forces included high-level meetings on defense cooperation and military education. These were planned to be offered to delegations of foreign soldiers led by high-level PLA officers.
Although the numbers of PLA troops allowed in would have been small, crucial information about operating in one of North America’s harshest conditions could be effectively learned and passed on to soldiers training in China.
Canada’s inability to censor secret information also raises questions about the country’s chance at keeping sensitive information from falling into the hands of PLA agents.
Even before China’s lies allowed a small outbreak of a novel coronavirus to burn across the globe earlier this year, there were plenty of reasons to distrust the People’s Republic.
From the ruling communist party’s torturous treatment of ethnic minorities to threats of conquest against neighboring countries, it’s clear that it’s in nobody’s best interest to give the Chinese military a helping hand.
While Trump’s stance on halting communist China is clear, presumptive President-elect Joe Biden has historically taken a different approach to the Asian powerhouse. After paving the way for a rising China, Biden now sits dangerously close to the presidency.
If left unchecked, there’s little doubt that China’s global ambitions will play out in disastrous fashion in the coming years.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-10--Mike Huckabee: Here Are 4 Major Points About the Texas Lawsuit the Establishment Media Won’t Tell Yo

Mike Huckabee: Here Are 4 Major Points About the Texas Lawsuit the Establishment Media Won’t Tell You

All 50 states have now certified their votes , but the electors have yet to meet .
As of this writing , Arizona has become the 18th state to join Texas ’ lawsuit against Georgia , Michigan , Wisconsin and Pennsylvania , seeking to delay the selection of their slates of electors .
If you look at the states that have joined the lawsuit blocked out on a map , it looks like about half the landmass of the U.S .
I would hope that would make the Supreme Court reluctant to simply turn them down , because it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voting practices in , basically , four Democrat-run cities , is rising , and we ’ ve already learned it ’ s not going away just because the people are told , “ You ’ re wrong , shut up.
” If you do a Google search for the Texas lawsuit , you get back a lot of sneering articles from liberal media outlets dismissing it as a “ Hail Mary ” pass or a “ doomed stunt.
” But I assume that my readers would rather get factual information than overheated opinions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m referring you to this excellent analysis for The Federalist by Margot Cleveland , who spent 25 years as a law clerk to a federal appellate court judge .
She explains clearly what the lawsuit says , what the basis of it is ( including quotes from case precedents that make it obvious that this is something the court should address ) and why Texas and the other states have standing to claim that they have been damaged by the actions of the states they ’ re suing .
And despite what you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , she ’ s impressed by what an excellent job the Texas attorney general ’ s office did in writing this lawsuit .
You should read the whole article , but here are just four of the major points you ’ re probably not hearing from most media outlets : 1 .
This case doesn ’ t hinge on showing evidence of vote fraud , which could have been wiped or shredded by now .
It ’ s based on the defendant states letting officials unilaterally change voting laws that only the legislature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ means the vote tallies , whether fraudulent or not , were derived through illegal and unconstitutional means .
In this case , the argument doesn ’ t depend on whether fraud can be proven beyond a doubt , but on the undeniable fact that laws that made fraud easier to commit were created unconstitutionally .
2 .
Texas is not asking that the election be handed to Trump .
They are asking the court to order the states to give the duty of selecting electors to their legislatures because that ’ s what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vote is tainted by illegal and unconstitutional actions , which the lawsuit clearly describes ( for instance , officials unilaterally changing ballot laws that can only be changed by the legislature , or imposing different standards for accepting ballots in Democrat-run counties than in Republican counties . )
The legislatures are free to choose Trump or Biden electors , but at least then , the choice will be made legally .
3 .
Texas has standing to sue the other states over this because , just as the House represents individual citizens , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election also picks the vice president , who settles any tie votes .
That means that any illegal actions that affect the results of this election also affect all states through control of the Senate .
4 .
As for the argument that the SCOTUS would be taking unprecedented action to interfere in a national election , the suit cites numerous quotes showing precedent for the plaintiff ’ s arguments .
It sounds as if the SCOTUS might have a harder time simply dismissing this case than media people who haven ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website .
If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal , you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

All 50 states have now certified their votes, but the electors have yet to meet.
As of this writing, Arizona has become the 18th state to join Texas’ lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, seeking to delay the selection of their slates of electors.
If you look at the states that have joined the lawsuit blocked out on a map, it looks like about half the landmass of the U.S.
I would hope that would make the Supreme Court reluctant to simply turn them down, because it’s obvious that the fury over the voting practices in, basically, four Democrat-run cities, is rising, and we’ve already learned it’s not going away just because the people are told, “You’re wrong, shut up.”
If you do a Google search for the Texas lawsuit, you get back a lot of sneering articles from liberal media outlets dismissing it as a “Hail Mary” pass or a “doomed stunt.”
But I assume that my readers would rather get factual information than overheated opinions masquerading as news. So I’m referring you to this excellent analysis for The Federalist by Margot Cleveland, who spent 25 years as a law clerk to a federal appellate court judge.
She explains clearly what the lawsuit says, what the basis of it is (including quotes from case precedents that make it obvious that this is something the court should address) and why Texas and the other states have standing to claim that they have been damaged by the actions of the states they’re suing.
And despite what you’re hearing from other media outlets, she’s impressed by what an excellent job the Texas attorney general’s office did in writing this lawsuit.
Do you think the Supreme Court will accept the Texas lawsuit? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 85% (703 Votes) No: 15% (124 Votes)
You should read the whole article, but here are just four of the major points you’re probably not hearing from most media outlets:
1. This case doesn’t hinge on showing evidence of vote fraud, which could have been wiped or shredded by now.
It’s based on the defendant states letting officials unilaterally change voting laws that only the legislature has the power to change, which means the vote tallies, whether fraudulent or not, were derived through illegal and unconstitutional means.
In this case, the argument doesn’t depend on whether fraud can be proven beyond a doubt, but on the undeniable fact that laws that made fraud easier to commit were created unconstitutionally.
2. Texas is not asking that the election be handed to Trump.
They are asking the court to order the states to give the duty of selecting electors to their legislatures because that’s what is required under the Constitution when the vote is tainted by illegal and unconstitutional actions, which the lawsuit clearly describes (for instance, officials unilaterally changing ballot laws that can only be changed by the legislature, or imposing different standards for accepting ballots in Democrat-run counties than in Republican counties.)
The legislatures are free to choose Trump or Biden electors, but at least then, the choice will be made legally.
3. Texas has standing to sue the other states over this because, just as the House represents individual citizens, the Senate represents states.
The national election also picks the vice president, who settles any tie votes. That means that any illegal actions that affect the results of this election also affect all states through control of the Senate.
4. As for the argument that the SCOTUS would be taking unprecedented action to interfere in a national election, the suit cites numerous quotes showing precedent for the plaintiff’s arguments.
It sounds as if the SCOTUS might have a harder time simply dismissing this case than media people who haven’t read it do.
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-10--Pfizer’s COVID Vaccine Clears Final Hurdle Before FDA Authorization

The FDA ’ s advisory panel voted 17-4 to approve Pfizer ’ s COVID-19 vaccine for use , clearing the way for its authorization and distribution nationwide .
After scouring over data during a multi-hour meeting on Thursday , the panel determined the vaccine was safe and voted to recommend approval .
Though the panel ’ s decision is merely an advisory one , the FDA is expected to heed its recommendation and approve Pfizer ’ s vaccine as early as Friday .
The agency touted the vaccine ’ s safety and effectiveness on Tuesday , a sign that it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ following the panel ’ s recommendation .
Distribution could begin within 24 hours of FDA authorization , and vaccinations could begin as soon as next week .
Pfizer said that vaccines could be shipped “ within hours ” of being granted approval and is standing by to distribute millions of doses from its plant outside Kalamazoo , Michigan , the Detroit Free Press reported Thursday .
The panel ’ s meeting was broadcast live on YouTube in hopes that full transparency would increase public confidence in the vaccine .
Confidence in possible COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ summer but has steadily increased throughout the fall , with 63 percent of Americans surveyed in November saying they would receive a vaccine .
Earlier this week , Canada authorized Pfizer ’ s vaccine for emergency use and the U.K. became the first country to embark on a mass vaccination campaign in an effort to end the coronavirus pandemic .
Pfizer ’ s vaccine , developed with Germany ’ s BioNTech , will likely secure government approval only 11 months after the drugmakers began working on it , shattering all records related to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pfizer last month released the results of clinical trials showing its vaccine to be safe and over 90 percent effective .
The United States has seen record case counts , hospitalizations and deaths in recent days .
The virus has infected nearly 15.5 million Americans to date and killed over 290,000 , according to a Johns Hopkins University database .
A version of this article appeared on the Daily Caller News Foundation website .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

The FDA’s advisory panel voted 17-4 to approve Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for use, clearing the way for its authorization and distribution nationwide.
After scouring over data during a multi-hour meeting on Thursday, the panel determined the vaccine was safe and voted to recommend approval.
Though the panel’s decision is merely an advisory one, the FDA is expected to heed its recommendation and approve Pfizer’s vaccine as early as Friday.
The agency touted the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness on Tuesday, a sign that it is prepared to swiftly grant emergency authorization following the panel’s recommendation.
Distribution could begin within 24 hours of FDA authorization, and vaccinations could begin as soon as next week.
Pfizer said that vaccines could be shipped “within hours” of being granted approval and is standing by to distribute millions of doses from its plant outside Kalamazoo, Michigan, the Detroit Free Press reported Thursday.
The panel’s meeting was broadcast live on YouTube in hopes that full transparency would increase public confidence in the vaccine.
Confidence in possible COVID-19 vaccines hit a low point in late summer but has steadily increased throughout the fall, with 63 percent of Americans surveyed in November saying they would receive a vaccine.
Earlier this week, Canada authorized Pfizer’s vaccine for emergency use and the U.K. became the first country to embark on a mass vaccination campaign in an effort to end the coronavirus pandemic.
Will you receive a COVID-19 vaccine when it becomes available? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 27% (3 Votes) No: 73% (8 Votes)
Pfizer’s vaccine, developed with Germany’s BioNTech, will likely secure government approval only 11 months after the drugmakers began working on it, shattering all records related to vaccine development, authorization and distribution.
Pfizer last month released the results of clinical trials showing its vaccine to be safe and over 90 percent effective.
The United States has seen record case counts, hospitalizations and deaths in recent days. The virus has infected nearly 15.5 million Americans to date and killed over 290,000, according to a Johns Hopkins University database.
Content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of their original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
A version of this article appeared on the Daily Caller News Foundation website.
Did you know that The Western Journal now publishes some content in Spanish as well as English, for international audiences? Click here to read this article on The Western Journal en Español!
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-10--‘WJ Live’: Crenshaw Blasts Pelosi and Other Dems for ‘Unscientific, Unconstitutional’ Lockdowns

Support Christian , conservative journalism at The Western Journal by joining our subscription service .
Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw of @ @ @ @ @ Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California for refusing to pass bipartisan relief bills and subsequently “ @ @ @ @ @ for political gain.
” ► Click HERE to subscribe to “ WJ Live ” : @ @ @ @ @ Journal ’ s mission is to equip readers with the truth , and we ’ @ @ @ @ @ same passion to the listeners of “ WJ Live.
” You ’ ll hear from @ @ @ @ @ guests on the most important topics of the day : coronavirus , lockdowns , riots @ @ @ @ @ elitism and the 2020 election .
TRENDING : State Lawmaker Who Called on 'Soldiers ' @ @ @ @ @ Devastating News After Head of Legislature Sees Video ► Don ’ t miss an episode @ @ @ @ @ ” Click HERE to get it delivered directly to your inbox : http : //w-j.co/s/ef7f7 @ @ @ @ @ and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Support Christian, conservative journalism at The Western Journal by joining our subscription service.
Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw of Texas also called out House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California for refusing to pass bipartisan relief bills and subsequently “holding the American people hostage for political gain.”
► Click HERE to subscribe to “WJ Live”: http://w-j.co/s/51c85
The Western Journal’s mission is to equip readers with the truth, and we’re excited to bring that same passion to the listeners of “WJ Live.” You’ll hear from writers, editors and special guests on the most important topics of the day: coronavirus, lockdowns, riots, government overreach, Hollywood elitism and the 2020 election.
► Don’t miss an episode of “WJ Live!” Click HERE to get it delivered directly to your inbox: http://w-j.co/s/ef7f7
Follow The Western Journal on social media:
► Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WesternJournal
► Twitter: https://twitter.com/WestJournalism
► Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wjlivepodcast/
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-10--Rush Limbaugh Issues Dire Prediction for America’s Future

Americans , divided along ideological and cultural lines following the still-contested presidential election , are at a dangerous fork in the road , according to conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh .
Limbaugh , on his program Wednesday , suggested that the country ’ s inability to unite around any common or shared vision for America ’ s future — or past — might actually lead to a national breakup .
It ’ s hard to disagree with that assessment , especially when you look at the separation between conservatives and the American left .
After the Sept. 11 , 2001 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ together in an inspiring way .
On that terrible day and for months afterward , every citizen of the country was a New Yorker .
But in the years since , that sense of unity has dissipated .
Some New Yorkers are no longer New Yorkers following an ongoing exodus from the state ’ s leftist politics and taxes .
In March , when the coronavirus pandemic arrived on America shores , tribalism won the day , as the establishment media politicized the illness and weaponized it against President Donald Trump .
Once-trusted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year unmasking themselves as leftist partisans to even casual media observers .
The Constitution itself is no longer a unifying document for the country , either .
Conservatives , generally speaking , use the country ’ ’ s founding document as a road map to play within the rules , while Democrats and the left are more prone to subverting the law and viewing that same document as a roadblock .
America is at a stalemate , and Limbaugh doesn ’ t see a way out .
After some discussion about media bias @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between warring factions of Americans , Limbaugh on Wednesday concluded he did not see a clear scenario in which the country finds a place of unity .
“ I actually think that we ’ re trending toward secession , ” Limbaugh said .
“ I see more and more people asking , ‘ What in the world do we have in common with the people who live in , say , New York ?
What is there that makes us believe that there is enough of us there to even have a chance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if you ’ re talking about votes , ” he added .
Many Americans are dug in , and per Limbaugh , a people so entrenched ideologically can not easily meet in the middle .
More importantly , the radio host questioned if people are even aware of what “ the middle ” is at this point in the country ’ s history .
“ I see a lot of bloggers … have written extensively about how distant and separated and how much more separated our culture is becoming politically and that it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” he said .
“ There can not be a peaceful coexistence of two completely different theories of life , theories of government , theories of how we manage our affairs.
” RELATED : Representative Announces He Will Propose Bill To Allow Texas To Secede from United States “ We can ’ t be in this dire a conflict without something giving somewhere along the way , ” Limbaugh said .
Limbaugh has always had a firm grasp on the pulse of national politics , and has one of the most vast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mind , the radio host stated that even he simply doesn ’ t know right now whether he would oppose a national divorce .
“ I know that there is a sizable and growing sentiment for people who believe that [ secession ] is where we ’ re headed whether we want to or not .
Whether we want to go there or not .
I myself haven ’ t made up my mind , ” he said .
“ I still haven ’ t given up the idea that we are the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do is find a way to unite and win .
And our problem is the fact that there are just so many RINOs , so many Republicans in the Washington establishment who will do anything to maintain their membership in the establishment because of the perks and the opportunities that are presented for their kids and so forth , ” he concluded on the subject .
Ironically , hours after Limbaugh ’ s comments on the division in the country , the tag # CivilWar became the number one trend on Twitter Wednesday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a point of conflict in and of itself online , as conservatives and leftists sparred with one another in a battle of words over how badly each side saw the other losing a hypothetical conflict .
One gentleman on the platform seemed to capture the mood of those watching in disbelief : We ’ re definitely living in a divided country , so it ’ s difficult to argue that Limbaugh wasn ’ t on the mark regarding sentiment in favor of a national separation .
If a once-in-a-century pandemic can ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anything at this point that could ?
The president himself was hospitalized , and even that became a topic for fighting , as many wished him death .
While not a comfortable thought , if Americans no longer share the same values , language and facts , then at this point wouldn ’ t secession just be a formality ?
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Americans, divided along ideological and cultural lines following the still-contested presidential election, are at a dangerous fork in the road, according to conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh.
Limbaugh, on his program Dec. 9, suggested that the country’s inability to unite around any common or shared vision for America’s future — or past — might actually lead to a national breakup.
It’s hard to disagree with that assessment, especially when you look at the separation between conservatives and the American left.
After the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, the country came together in an inspiring way. On that terrible day and for months afterward, every citizen of the country was a New Yorker.
But in the years since, that sense of unity has dissipated. Some New Yorkers are no longer New Yorkers following an ongoing exodus from the state’s leftist politics and taxes.
In March, when the coronavirus pandemic arrived on America shores, tribalism won the day, as the establishment media politicized the illness and weaponized it against President Donald Trump. Once-trusted media outlets have since spent the entire year unmasking themselves as leftist partisans to even casual media observers.
The Constitution itself is no longer a unifying document for the country, either.
Conservatives, generally speaking, use the country’’s founding document as a road map to play within the rules, while Democrats and the left are more prone to subverting the law and viewing that same document as a roadblock.
America is at a stalemate, and Limbaugh doesn’t see a way out.
Do you agree with Limbaugh on secession? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 91% (3822 Votes) No: 9% (367 Votes)
After some discussion about media bias and a fundamental disagreement on the facts between warring factions of Americans, Limbaugh on Dec. 9 concluded he did not see a clear scenario in which the country finds a place of unity.
“I actually think that we’re trending toward secession,” Limbaugh said.
“I see more and more people asking, ‘What in the world do we have in common with the people who live in, say, New York? What is there that makes us believe that there is enough of us there to even have a chance at winning New York,’ especially if you’re talking about votes,” he added.
Many Americans are dug in, and per Limbaugh, a people so entrenched ideologically cannot easily meet in the middle. More importantly, the radio host questioned if people are even aware of what “the middle” is at this point in the country’s history.
“I see a lot of bloggers … have written extensively about how distant and separated and how much more separated our culture is becoming politically and that it can’t go on this way,” he said. “There cannot be a peaceful coexistence of two completely different theories of life, theories of government, theories of how we manage our affairs.”
“We can’t be in this dire a conflict without something giving somewhere along the way,” Limbaugh said.
Limbaugh has always had a firm grasp on the pulse of national politics, and has one of the most vast audiences in media. With that in mind, the radio host stated that even he simply doesn’t know right now whether he would oppose a national divorce.
“I know that there is a sizable and growing sentiment for people who believe that [secession] is where we’re headed whether we want to or not. Whether we want to go there or not. I myself haven’t made up my mind,” he said.
“I still haven’t given up the idea that we are the majority and that all we have to do is find a way to unite and win. And our problem is the fact that there are just so many RINOs, so many Republicans in the Washington establishment who will do anything to maintain their membership in the establishment because of the perks and the opportunities that are presented for their kids and so forth,” he concluded on the subject.
Ironically, hours after Limbaugh’s comments on the division in the country, the tag #CivilWar became the No. 1 trend on Twitter. Naturally, the trend became a point of conflict in and of itself online, as conservatives and leftists sparred with one another in a battle of words over how badly each side saw the other losing a hypothetical conflict.
One gentleman on the platform seemed to capture the mood of those watching in disbelief:
If y’all could stop making Civil War trend pic.twitter.com/UrGyWmNEIm — Mr. Turner (@mitchelldturner) December 9, 2020
We’re definitely living in a divided country, so it’s difficult to argue that Limbaugh wasn’t on the mark regarding sentiment in favor of a national separation.
If a once-in-a-century pandemic can’t broadly unite Americans, then is there anything at this point that could? The president himself was hospitalized, and even that became a topic for fighting, as many wished him death.
While not a comfortable thought, if Americans no longer share the same values, language and facts, then at this point wouldn’t secession just be a formality?
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-10--GOP Senator Introduces Bill To Send Significant Relief Checks to Most Americans

GOP Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri has introduced a targeted coronavirus relief bill for struggling American individuals and families .
Amid months of stalled negotiations between the Democrat-run House , the GOP-controlled Senate , and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin , Hawley on Wednesday introduced a bill that would offer immediate relief to individuals and families .
In the chess match that has become relief talks , Hawley is seeking a targeted and bipartisan agreement .
Hawley stated quite strongly that he is opposed to any bill that doesn ’ t offer direct checks to Americans .
In fact , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ relief , according to The Hill .
Signaling his approval of the CARES Act which was passed in March with bipartisan support , Hawley said he again wants the federal government to send each American making less than $ 75,000 annually a $ 1,200 stimulus check , and more for those with minor children .
“ It ’ s what every single senator has already supported , so there should be no fiddling about ‘ Oh I don ’ t know this is different.
’ It ’ s exactly what every senator has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ If the negotiators can ’ t reach some sort of compromise I will go to the floor next week and I ’ ll ask for an up or down vote on that.
” Hawley also spoke with Fox News on Thursday , and said he would ask for an up or down vote on a bill for direct payments should Congress fail to reach a deal by the week ’ s end .
He also stated he has the support of President Trump .
According to The Hill , Hawley said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ past weekend on the phone about such a bill , and encouraged him to veto bills that do not include stimulus payments .
“ I ’ m continuing to be flummoxed as to why there aren ’ t any direct payments .
Everybody supported this in March .
It ’ s the most useful , helpful and frankly popular aspect .
So I told [ the president ] that , and … I encouraged him to veto it , ” Hawley stated .
Hawley wrote on Twitter that the payments for individuals and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sent out beginning in April .
“ Today I am introducing legislation to provide direct # COVID19 relief for every working family in need – $ 1200/ person , $ 2400/ couple , $ 500/ child .
If the Senate will not include this help in a relief package , I will go to the floor & ask for up or down vote , ” Hawley wrote .
“ This is exactly the relief every Senator voted for in March .
Working families should not be an afterthought now .
They should be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” he added .
Hawley also criticized his peers in Congress for failing to come together , and cited rising unemployment numbers for his motivation to get checks sent out .
“ Americans need direct payments now .
Families are struggling .
Unemployment claims are rising and food lines are growing .
It ’ s time Congress finally acts , ” Hawley said in a statement obtained by Fox News .
“ Direct payments should be at the center of any Covid relief legislation that Congress passes .
If Congress doesn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in it by next week , I will go to the Senate floor to demand a vote on my legislation.
” Hawley signaled last week he is willing to reach across the aisle , and even work with Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , if necessary , to get a direct payment deal inked .
NBC News correspondent Garrett Haake tweeted that he had spoken with Ocasio-Cortez , and she had informed him that she and Hawley had spoken .
Haake quoted the New York Democrat as saying she would be “ happy to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Party ” with regard to direct payments .
Hawley did not dispute the report in a response on Twitter .
“ I will gladly work w/ @ AOC and anyone else who wants to help working families .
Families and working people in need should be the FIRST consideration in COVID relief , not last , ” the Missouri Republican wrote .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

GOP Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri has introduced a targeted coronavirus relief bill for struggling American individuals and families.
Amid months of stalled negotiations between the Democrat-run House, the GOP-controlled Senate, and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Hawley on Wednesday introduced a bill that would offer immediate relief to individuals and families.
In the chess match that has become relief talks, Hawley is seeking a targeted and bipartisan agreement.
Hawley stated quite strongly that he is opposed to any bill that doesn’t offer direct checks to Americans. In fact, he said his bill would only include such relief, according to The Hill.
Signaling his approval of the CARES Act which was passed in March with bipartisan support, Hawley said he again wants the federal government to send each American making less than $75,000 annually a $1,200 stimulus check, and more for those with minor children.
“It’s what every single senator has already supported, so there should be no fiddling about ‘Oh I don’t know this is different.’ It’s exactly what every senator has voted for once,” Hawley said.
“If the negotiators can’t reach some sort of compromise I will go to the floor next week and I’ll ask for an up or down vote on that.”
Hawley also spoke with Fox News on Thursday, and said he would ask for an up or down vote on a bill for direct payments should Congress fail to reach a deal by the week’s end. He also stated he has the support of President Trump.
Do you think Americans should receive another round of stimulus checks? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 92% (768 Votes) No: 8% (67 Votes)
According to The Hill, Hawley said he spoke with President Donald Trump this past weekend on the phone about such a bill, and encouraged him to veto bills that do not include stimulus payments.
“I’m continuing to be flummoxed as to why there aren’t any direct payments. Everybody supported this in March. It’s the most useful, helpful and frankly popular aspect. So I told [the president] that, and … I encouraged him to veto it,” Hawley stated.
Hawley wrote on Twitter that the payments for individuals and families should mirror payments that were first sent out beginning in April.
This is exactly the relief every Senator voted for in March. Working families should not be an afterthought now. They should be first in line for #COVID19 relief — Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) December 10, 2020
“Today I am introducing legislation to provide direct #COVID19 relief for every working family in need – $1200/ person, $2400/ couple, $500/ child. If the Senate will not include this help in a relief package, I will go to the floor & ask for up or down vote,” Hawley wrote.
“This is exactly the relief every Senator voted for in March. Working families should not be an afterthought now. They should be first in line for #COVID19 relief,” he added.
Hawley also criticized his peers in Congress for failing to come together, and cited rising unemployment numbers for his motivation to get checks sent out.
“Americans need direct payments now. Families are struggling. Unemployment claims are rising and food lines are growing. It’s time Congress finally acts,” Hawley said in a statement obtained by Fox News.
“Direct payments should be at the center of any Covid relief legislation that Congress passes. If Congress doesn’t pass relief legislation with direct payments in it by next week, I will go to the Senate floor to demand a vote on my legislation.”
Hawley signaled last week he is willing to reach across the aisle, and even work with Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, if necessary, to get a direct payment deal inked.
NBC News correspondent Garrett Haake tweeted that he had spoken with Ocasio-Cortez, and she had informed him that she and Hawley had spoken. Haake quoted the New York Democrat as saying she would be “happy to work with that element of the Republican Party” with regard to direct payments.
In the department of strange bedfellows, she noted that Senator @HawleyMO has been a big proponent of stimulus checks, and that she’d be “happy to work with that element of the Republican Party” to get direct payments to people who need them. — Garrett Haake (@GarrettHaake) December 4, 2020
Hawley did not dispute the report in a response on Twitter.
I will gladly work w/ @AOC and anyone else who wants to help working families. Families and working people in need should be the FIRST consideration in COVID relief, not last https://t.co/q8bPFtBeDl — Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) December 4, 2020
“I will gladly work w/ @AOC and anyone else who wants to help working families. Families and working people in need should be the FIRST consideration in COVID relief, not last,” the Missouri Republican wrote.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.