westernjournal--2020-12-22--Americans Bought an Astonishing Number of Guns in 2020

Americans bought a record number of firearms in 2020 amid a year that challenged our conventional wisdom about civil liberties , showed us the delicate balance between law and order and even strained the country ’ s supply chains .
While gun sales generally increase in presidential election years , 2020 has been one for the record books , and it still isn ’ t over .
President Donald Trump has vowed to continue fighting to challenge the Nov. 3 election results that show he lost to Democrat Joe Biden in a number of key swing states .
Additionally , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the thumb of some form of draconian lockdown due to the coronavirus pandemic .
While the waves of civil unrest , rioting and looting that overtook many cities in the country over the spring and summer has subsided , those events , too , reminded us of the importance of exercising our Second Amendment rights to buy and own firearms .
Collectively , Americans bought an estimated 21 million guns this year , an increase of 73 percent from 2019 , according to an analysis of FBI background check data from the anti-firearms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information from the National Instant Criminal Background Check System and applying methodology to how many of those checks generally equate to gun sales historically , the outlet estimated more than 21 million legal gun sales occurred from January to Nov , 30 .
The biggest month for actual firearms sales was June , when The Trace estimated 2.7 million guns were sold .
Nearly 1 million of those were estimated to be shotguns or rifles , while more than 1.7 million were estimated to be handguns .
The following month , in July @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sold .
The numbers for long guns and handguns sold were nearly identical to those in June , The Trace found .
The surge in sales began in March , when an estimated 2 million guns were sold , according to The Trace .
That number dwarfed the 1.1 million that were estimated sold in February .
March was , of course , the first month of the coronavirus pandemic in the U.S .
In November , Americans bought an estimated 1.7 million guns , compared to the 1.1 million sold during the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Trace .
The Trace was originally funded by Everytown for Gun Safety , the anti-gun group established by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg , according to the liberal site website HuffPost .
The tone of its gun sale piece makes it clear The Trace finds nothing to celebrate about the sale of so many guns , but of course , the groaning of leftists is generally cause for celebration among rational people .
That is definitely the case here .
Arguably , there might have been more guns sold in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t for shortages of weapons and ammunition .
If you ’ ve ventured into a gun or sporting good store since summer , you ’ ve probably seen barren shelves and walls .
Both guns and ammo seem to be in short supply nationwide .
The American Rifleman publication , which is owned by the National Rifle Association , reported this month that a national shortage of ammunition is expected to last well into 2021 .
“ We have cleaned inventory in all retail and wholesale locations , ” Vista Outdoor CEO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ earnings call , according to The American Rifleman .
“ Despite us producing flat out for six months , there is no buildup of inventory at any of our customers .
In fact , every one of them would like significantly more .
Simply put , consumer demand continues to outpace our ability to supply , ” Metz also said .
Another metric for looking at Americans ’ interest in exercising their Second Amendment rights this year are raw NICS background checks .
The numbers , while they don ’ t always equate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ astounding .
The FBI reported that in the first 11 months of 2020 , a stunning 35.7 million background checks were conducted in the country .
For some context , only 27.5 million such checks were conducted in all of 2016 , the year anti-gun Democrat Hillary Clinton was expected to win the presidential election .
Now , after a harrowing year and faced with the prospect of an anti-gun Democrat in the House in Biden , Americans are still buying firearms at record numbers , and those numbers could arguably be sagging @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inability to keep up with the demand .
Biden , of course , has vowed sweeping new firearms laws , including banning high-capacity magazines and outlawing so-called “ weapons of war ” or “ assault weapons , ” which are essentially just sporting rifles , and he has promised to require universal background checks for all gun transfers .
These intrusive proposals and more are on his website .
Biden and Democrats are seeking to wage a war on individual liberties through banning some weapons and accessories , and through making others cost-prohibitive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will give Biden and his Democratic Party cause for hesitation , should they get full government control next month .
Americans of all backgrounds discovered the benefits of gun ownership this year , though .
While the surge did not occur in the best of circumstances , appreciation for the Second Amendment right now seems unparalleled compared to any other time on record .
That is welcome news for Americans who enjoy shooting for sport , hunting or for those who simply like to be in a position to protect themselves from threats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Americans bought a record number of firearms in 2020 amid a year that challenged our conventional wisdom about civil liberties, showed us the delicate balance between law and order and even strained the country’s supply chains.
While gun sales generally increase in presidential election years, 2020 has been one for the record books, and it still isn’t over. President Donald Trump has vowed to continue fighting to challenge the Nov. 3 election results that show he lost to Democrat Joe Biden in a number of key swing states.
Additionally, many states still have their residents under the thumb of some form of draconian lockdown due to the coronavirus pandemic.
While the waves of civil unrest, rioting and looting that overtook many cities in the country over the spring and summer has subsided, those events, too, reminded us of the importance of exercising our Second Amendment rights to buy and own firearms.
Collectively, Americans bought an estimated 21 million guns this year, an increase of 73 percent from 2019, according to an analysis of FBI background check data from the anti-firearms sales watchdog group The Trace.
Using information from the National Instant Criminal Background Check System and applying methodology to how many of those checks generally equate to gun sales historically, the outlet estimated more than 21 million legal gun sales occurred from January to Nov, 30.
The biggest month for actual firearms sales was June, when The Trace estimated 2.7 million guns were sold. Nearly 1 million of those were estimated to be shotguns or rifles, while more than 1.7 million were estimated to be handguns.
The following month, in July, an estimated 2.5 million guns were sold. The numbers for long guns and handguns sold were nearly identical to those in June, The Trace found.
The surge in sales began in March, when an estimated 2 million guns were sold, according to The Trace. That number dwarfed the 1.1 million that were estimated sold in February. March was, of course, the first month of the coronavirus pandemic in the U.S.
Did you or someone you know buy a gun this year? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 79% (1068 Votes) No: 21% (277 Votes)
In November, Americans bought an estimated 1.7 million guns, compared to the 1.1 million sold during the same month in 2019, according to The Trace.
The Trace was originally funded by Everytown for Gun Safety, the anti-gun group established by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, according to the liberal site website HuffPost. The tone of its gun sale piece makes it clear The Trace finds nothing to celebrate about the sale of so many guns, but of course, the groaning of leftists is generally cause for celebration among rational people. That is definitely the case here.
Arguably, there might have been more guns sold in the country this year if it weren’t for shortages of weapons and ammunition. If you’ve ventured into a gun or sporting good store since summer, you’ve probably seen barren shelves and walls. Both guns and ammo seem to be in short supply nationwide.
The American Rifleman publication, which is owned by the National Rifle Association, reported this month that a national shortage of ammunition is expected to last well into 2021.
“We have cleaned inventory in all retail and wholesale locations,” Vista Outdoor CEO Christopher Metz said on a recent company earnings call, according to The American Rifleman.
“Despite us producing flat out for six months, there is no buildup of inventory at any of our customers. In fact, every one of them would like significantly more. Simply put, consumer demand continues to outpace our ability to supply,” Metz also said.
Vista Outdoor produces a number of popular ammunition brands, including CCI, Remington and American Eagle.
Another metric for looking at Americans’ interest in exercising their Second Amendment rights this year are raw NICS background checks. The numbers, while they don’t always equate to final sales of guns, are astounding.
The FBI reported that in the first 11 months of 2020, a stunning 35.7 million background checks were conducted in the country. For some context, only 27.5 million such checks were conducted in all of 2016, the year anti-gun Democrat Hillary Clinton was expected to win the presidential election.
Now, after a harrowing year and faced with the prospect of an anti-gun Democrat in the House in Biden, Americans are still buying firearms at record numbers, and those numbers could arguably be sagging due to the gun industry’s inability to keep up with the demand.
Biden, of course, has vowed sweeping new firearms laws, including banning high-capacity magazines and outlawing so-called “weapons of war” or “assault weapons,” which are essentially just sporting rifles, and he has promised to require universal background checks for all gun transfers. These intrusive proposals and more are on his website.
Biden and Democrats are seeking to wage a war on individual liberties through banning some weapons and accessories, and through making others cost-prohibitive. Perhaps the growing popularity of guns will give Biden and his Democratic Party cause for hesitation, should they get full government control next month.
Americans of all backgrounds discovered the benefits of gun ownership this year, though. While the surge did not occur in the best of circumstances, appreciation for the Second Amendment right now seems unparalleled compared to any other time on record.
That is welcome news for Americans who enjoy shooting for sport, hunting or for those who simply like to be in a position to protect themselves from threats.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-22--Singer Reveals Truth All Christians Need To Hear: People Are Believing ‘They Can Reach Heaven withou

Singer Reveals Truth All Christians Need To Hear: People Are Believing ‘They Can Reach Heaven without Jesus’ Help’

John Cooper has been entertaining audiences for more than two decades as the lead singer of popular rock band Skillet , but now he ’ s adding a new mission into the mix : combating cultural relativism .
Cooper , who has been increasingly vocal on issues plaguing Christianity and America , is out with a new book titled “ Awake and Alive to Truth : Finding Truth in the Chaos of a Relativistic World ” — and he ’ s intent on driving home truth in an era of biblical apathy .
“ We have gotten so scared about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has caused a crisis , ” the singer recently said on the “ Edifi With Billy Hallowell ” podcast .
“ It has caused a crisis of people believing that they are good and that they can reach heaven without Jesus ’ help.
” Listen to Cooper discuss faith , relativism and more : Cooper has become more vocal in recent months about issues plaguing culture — a move that came after he started seeing friends around him struggle with their faith and make comments that didn ’ t quite align with biblical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ friends started to say , “ I don ’ t think that Jesus is the only way , ” or make other unbiblical claims , Cooper ’ s fears about the watering down of faith sparked in him a desire to speak out and help others navigate the ebbs and flows of an increasingly chaotic culture .
“ There is chaos happening for a reason , and we need to be bold about what those reasons are , ” Cooper said .
“ If you just ground your life in the truth of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this chaos.
” He said there ’ s a disturbing trend in which too many people have come to believe that “ nothing in the world is absolutely 100 percent true , ” saying things such as “ your truth ” and “ my truth.
” “ Relativism is something that Christians can not believe , ” he said , going on to note that there are many inside churches who don ’ t quite realize this .
“ We are in war where the church is losing so much ground within the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like Christianity anymore.
” Cooper knows that there ’ s a risk to extending outside of music to address the issues of the day — but he believes the stakes are too high to back down .
“ What we are losing is so great , ” he said .
“ If it costs me fans , we have to start trying to save as many as we can .
It ’ s that kind of a time.
” Find out more about Cooper ’ s mission in “ Awake and Alive to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a Relativistic World.
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

John Cooper has been entertaining audiences for more than two decades as the lead singer of popular rock band Skillet, but now he’s adding a new mission into the mix: combating cultural relativism.
Cooper, who has been increasingly vocal on issues plaguing Christianity and America, is out with a new book titled “Awake and Alive to Truth: Finding Truth in the Chaos of a Relativistic World” — and he’s intent on driving home truth in an era of biblical apathy.
“We have gotten so scared about saying things that are true that it has caused a crisis,” the singer recently said on the “Edifi With Billy Hallowell” podcast. “It has caused a crisis of people believing that they are good and that they can reach heaven without Jesus’ help.”
Listen to Cooper discuss faith, relativism and more:
Cooper has become more vocal in recent months about issues plaguing culture — a move that came after he started seeing friends around him struggle with their faith and make comments that didn’t quite align with biblical truth.
As some of his Christian friends started to say, “I don’t think that Jesus is the only way,” or make other unbiblical claims, Cooper’s fears about the watering down of faith sparked in him a desire to speak out and help others navigate the ebbs and flows of an increasingly chaotic culture.
“There is chaos happening for a reason, and we need to be bold about what those reasons are,” Cooper said. “If you just ground your life in the truth of Christ, you can escape all of this chaos.”
He said there’s a disturbing trend in which too many people have come to believe that “nothing in the world is absolutely 100 percent true,” saying things such as “your truth” and “my truth.”
“Relativism is something that Christians cannot believe,” he said, going on to note that there are many inside churches who don’t quite realize this. “We are in war where the church is losing so much ground within the church … the church is not looking like Christianity anymore.”
Cooper knows that there’s a risk to extending outside of music to address the issues of the day — but he believes the stakes are too high to back down.
“What we are losing is so great,” he said. “If it costs me fans, we have to start trying to save as many as we can. It’s that kind of a time.”
Find out more about Cooper’s mission in “Awake and Alive to Truth: Finding Truth in the Chaos of a Relativistic World.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-22--Out-of-Touch Pelosi Blasted After Idiotic Comment on Struggling Americans

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is rightly being chastised online after she celebrated the $ 600 stimulus checks most Americans can expect from the latest COVID relief bill as a “ significant ” sum of money .
Pelosi was speaking on the House floor Monday when she showcased her trademark snootiness by way of touting direct payments from the latest stimulus package as something that will greatly impact those affected by the economic impacts of the coronavirus pandemic .
In case Americans had forgotten how out of touch she is with everyday people , the career politician belittled them — this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ice cream freezer .
“ I would like them to have been bigger , but they are significant , and they will be going out soon , ” she said of the checks .
“ The president may insist on having his name on the check .
But make no mistake , those checks are from the American people , ” the California Democrat added in her floor speech .
TRENDING : Joe Biden 's Niece Caroline Receives Zero Jail Time After Pleading Guilty to DUI Pelosi ’ s comments come off as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Marie Antoinette .
The only thing missing from her disingenuous posturing about the pathetic bill was a proclamation to “ Let them eat cake !
” The relief bill agreed upon by congressional leaders on Sunday will send direct payments of $ 600 to individuals who earned less than $ 75,000 in 2019 , and $ 1,200 to married couples who made less than $ 150,000 combined .
Families with children under the age of 17 will receive an additional $ 600 per child , according to CNBC .
A family of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , while individuals will receive half of the $ 1,200 they did earlier this year from the CARES Act .
Of course , $ 600 is not enough to cover the median monthly rental rate in any state , according to data compiled by Experian .
The company noted that the cheapest median rent per month in the country was in West Virginia , at $ 866 per month as of the second quarter of 2019 .
The median monthly rental rate in California , Pelosi ’ s state , was $ 2,542 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amount she bragged on Monday was “ significant.
” It ’ s also worth noting that while Pelosi believes the $ 600 stimulus checks are “ significant , ” she called bonuses of $ 1,000 or more that were given to many workers by their employers as a result of the successful GOP-led and Trump-supported effort to reform the nation ’ s tax code in 2017 “ crumbs.
” “ In terms of the bonus that corporate America received versus the crumbs that they are giving to workers to kind of put the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pathetic , ” she said in January 2018 , according to Fox Business .
“ I think it ’ s insignificant.
” RELATED : Pelosi Reveals Her Bizarre Plan To Get Trump Out of the White House : Report Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told CNBC on Monday that Americans can expect to begin receiving their checks by next week .
In addition to the direct relief payments , which are likely to barely cover the cost of basic utilities for some families , the latest relief bill will include a $ 300 weekly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 284 billion for the Paycheck Protection Program .
Of course , with how little the direct payment sums are , and with how much the outlandish bill will add to the national debt , most Americans — and the country at large — would be better off if people could simply return to working full time .
While the unemployment rate has decreased significantly since April , millions of Americans are still out of work or underemployed thanks to unscientific and ineffective lockdowns in many areas of the country .
Small businesses also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s all occurred as our elected officials have continued to get paid handsomely .
Salaries for House representatives and senators are quite significant .
It seems as though the only person in Washington who hasn ’ t been getting paid while many Americans languish through no fault of their own is President Donald Trump , who gives his salary away quarterly to causes that help those in need .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is rightly being chastised online after she celebrated the $600 stimulus checks most Americans can expect from the latest COVID relief bill as a “significant” sum of money.
Pelosi was speaking on the House floor Monday when she showcased her trademark snootiness by way of touting direct payments from the latest stimulus package as something that will greatly impact those affected by the economic impacts of the coronavirus pandemic.
In case Americans had forgotten how out of touch she is with everyday people, the career politician belittled them — this time without showcasing her reported $24,000 ice cream freezer.
“I would like them to have been bigger, but they are significant, and they will be going out soon,” she said of the checks.
“The president may insist on having his name on the check. But make no mistake, those checks are from the American people,” the California Democrat added in her floor speech.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the $600 direct payment checks in the new stimulus bill: “I would like them to have been bigger, but they are significant.”https://t.co/Mho7Iud9Ui pic.twitter.com/NmevbNaoMj — CBS News (@CBSNews) December 21, 2020
Pelosi’s comments come off as disturbingly reminiscent of the tyrannical French queen, Marie Antoinette. The only thing missing from her disingenuous posturing about the pathetic bill was a proclamation to “Let them eat cake!”
The relief bill agreed upon by congressional leaders on Sunday will send direct payments of $600 to individuals who earned less than $75,000 in 2019, and $1,200 to married couples who made less than $150,000 combined. Families with children under the age of 17 will receive an additional $600 per child, according to CNBC.
Would $600 be a significant help to you or your family? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 9% (90 Votes) No: 91% (945 Votes)
A family of four can expect to receive $2,400, while individuals will receive half of the $1,200 they did earlier this year from the CARES Act.
Of course, $600 is not enough to cover the median monthly rental rate in any state, according to data compiled by Experian. The company noted that the cheapest median rent per month in the country was in West Virginia, at $866 per month as of the second quarter of 2019.
The median monthly rental rate in California, Pelosi’s state, was $2,542 — or roughly four times the one-time amount she bragged on Monday was “significant.”
It’s also worth noting that while Pelosi believes the $600 stimulus checks are “significant,” she called bonuses of $1,000 or more that were given to many workers by their employers as a result of the successful GOP-led and Trump-supported effort to reform the nation’s tax code in 2017 “crumbs.”
“In terms of the bonus that corporate America received versus the crumbs that they are giving to workers to kind of put the schmooze on — it’s so pathetic,” she said in January 2018, according to Fox Business. “I think it’s insignificant.”
Pelosi received a massive bipartisan backlash for her recent comments.
In 2018, Nancy Pelosi called $1,200 bonuses as a result of @realDonaldTrump‘s tax cuts “crumbs.” Today, she called the $600 stimulus checks after 8 months “significant.” Is there anyone in politics worse than this woman? https://t.co/k3KssC9qLm — Dinesh D’Souza (@DineshDSouza) December 21, 2020
And y’all wonder why I criticize the Democratic Party. And y’all wonder why I criticize Nancy Pelosi and say she has NO business being speaker. Electeds argued over $600 and then called it a “significant” amount for families in this country. This is a joke. https://t.co/Zv7oYXaHnp — Preston Mitchum (@PrestonMitchum) December 21, 2020
These may be her most tone-deaf remarks since she joked about her luxury freezer full of gourmet ice cream on a late night comedy show https://t.co/EfU1OsYeJd — Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) December 21, 2020
I’m old enough to remember when @SpeakerPelosi called $2500 or so from the Trump Tax Cuts “crumbs” — and now she’s bragging about getting everyone $600. — Virginia Kruta (@VAKruta) December 21, 2020
Nancy Pelosi is worth $114 million dollars. https://t.co/laaufc2TE3 — Cora Harrington (@lingerie_addict) December 21, 2020
Nancy Pelosi is a millionaire who has been clueless about what is or isn’t significant for working families, and marginalized people generally, for a long time. $600 is a slap in the face to those who keep these people in office with cushy salaries. https://t.co/j8ZrS4LBQz — Frederick Joseph (@FredTJoseph) December 21, 2020
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told CNBC on Monday that Americans can expect to begin receiving their checks by next week.
In addition to the direct relief payments, which are likely to barely cover the cost of basic utilities for some families, the latest relief bill will include a $300 weekly federal unemployment supplement and will allocate $284 billion for the Paycheck Protection Program.
Of course, with how little the direct payment sums are, and with how much the outlandish bill will add to the national debt, most Americans — and the country at large — would be better off if people could simply return to working full time.
While the unemployment rate has decreased significantly since April, millions of Americans are still out of work or underemployed thanks to unscientific and ineffective lockdowns in many areas of the country.
Small businesses also continue to go under, and it’s all occurred as our elected officials have continued to get paid handsomely. Salaries for House representatives and senators are quite significant.
It seems as though the only person in Washington who hasn’t been getting paid while many Americans languish through no fault of their own is President Donald Trump, who gives his salary away quarterly to causes that help those in need.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-22--Newsom Selects Kamala Harris’ Replacement in the Senate

California Gov .
Gavin Newsom appointed Secretary of State Alex Padilla on Tuesday as the state ’ s next U.S. senator to fill the seat being vacated by presumptive vice president-elect Kamala Harris .
“ Through his tenacity , integrity , smarts and grit , California is gaining a tested fighter in their corner who will be a fierce ally in D.C. , lifting up our state ’ s values and making sure we secure the critical resources to emerge stronger from this pandemic , ” Newsom said in a statement .
Padilla was widely expected to be Newsom ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ longtime political allies .
“ I am honored and humbled by the trust placed in me by Governor Newsom , and I intend to work each and every day to honor that trust and deliver for all Californians , ” Padilla said in a statement .
Padilla , 47 , has been California ’ s top elections official since 2015 .
In that position , he ’ s overseen a vast expansion of California ’ s mail-in voting system .
In the November election , California mailed a ballot to every single registered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oversaw the implementation of the Voter ’ s Choice Act , a 2016 law that allowed counties to mail all registered voters a ballot .
He ’ ll hold the Senate seat through 2022 , when he will have to run for re-election .
Harris hasn ’ t given a date for her resignation , but she appears set to be inaugurated as vice president on Jan. 20 .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

California Gov. Gavin Newsom appointed Secretary of State Alex Padilla on Tuesday as the state’s next U.S. senator to fill the seat being vacated by presumptive vice president-elect Kamala Harris.
“Through his tenacity, integrity, smarts and grit, California is gaining a tested fighter in their corner who will be a fierce ally in D.C., lifting up our state’s values and making sure we secure the critical resources to emerge stronger from this pandemic,” Newsom said in a statement.
Padilla was widely expected to be Newsom’s pick, as the two are longtime political allies.
“I am honored and humbled by the trust placed in me by Governor Newsom, and I intend to work each and every day to honor that trust and deliver for all Californians,” Padilla said in a statement.
Padilla, 47, has been California’s top elections official since 2015. In that position, he’s overseen a vast expansion of California’s mail-in voting system.
In the November election, California mailed a ballot to every single registered voter. Prior to that, he oversaw the implementation of the Voter’s Choice Act, a 2016 law that allowed counties to mail all registered voters a ballot.
He’ll hold the Senate seat through 2022, when he will have to run for re-election.
Harris hasn’t given a date for her resignation, but she appears set to be inaugurated as vice president on Jan. 20.
He lives in Los Angeles.
Do you support this pick? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 2% (2 Votes) No: 98% (103 Votes)
[jwplayer AetKtOwv]
The Western Journal has reviewed this Associated Press story and may have altered it prior to publication to ensure that it meets our editorial standards.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-22--Russia and China Intrude on US Ally’s Air Defense Space with Joint Military Maneuver

Nineteen Chinese and Russian aircraft intruded into South Korea ’ s air defense identification zone on Tuesday , forcing the United States ally to scramble fighter jets in response .
Four Chinese warplanes followed by 15 Russian aircraft entered the Korea Air Defense Identification Zone , South Korea ’ s Joint Chiefs of Staff told Reuters .
South Korean air force fighters were dispatched to take tactical measures in response .
The Chinese military had reportedly told South Korea that it would be carrying out routine training prior to entering the airspace , but the Joint Chiefs of Staff said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ This incident seems to be a joint military drill between China and Russia but requires a further analysis , ” the JCS said in a statement .
TRENDING : Joe Biden 's Niece Caroline Receives Zero Jail Time After Pleading Guilty to DUI China and Russia have been contacted and directed to not let this happen again , Reuters reported .
This is not the first incident where Russian and Chinese aircraft appeared to be testing South Korea ’ s air defenses .
In July 2019 , a joint patrol by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with South Korean fighter planes , The Wall Street Journal reported .
The bomber patrol flew over the waters between the Korean Peninsula and Japan , and other warplanes flew several miles outside South Korean airspace , according to the report .
South Korean pilots fired warning shots and flares in response to the incursion .
The United States has military bases in Japan and South Korea .
Its regular drills with the South Korean military are often a cause for conflict with North Korea .
After the July incident , Russia ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and blamed South Korean fighters for engaging in dangerous maneuvers .
“ South Korea has previously unsuccessfully tried to interfere with Russia ’ s flight above the neutral waters of the Sea of Japan , ” the ministry said in a statement , according to The Journal .
Later , South Korean officials said Moscow had admitted the mistake and blamed it on a “ technical glitch , ” BBC reported .
“ Moscow said if the aircraft flew according to an initially planned route , this incident would not have occurred , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House , Yoon Do-han , said .
Russia , however , denied any intrusion even took place , according to the BBC .
Meanwhile , China Defense ministry spokesman Wu Qian defended the exercise and said his country “ strictly abided by the relevant regulations of international law and did not enter the airspace of other countries , ” the BBC reported .
A researcher at the Sejong Institute said the July flyover served as a warning , according to The Wall Street Journal .
“ This is a message to the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ If you strengthen the U.S.-Japan military alliance , we have no choice but to react militarily as well , ” Hong Hyun-ik told the newspaper .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Nineteen Chinese and Russian aircraft intruded into South Korea’s air defense identification zone on Tuesday, forcing the United States ally to scramble fighter jets in response.
Four Chinese warplanes followed by 15 Russian aircraft entered the Korea Air Defense Identification Zone, South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff told Reuters.
South Korean air force fighters were dispatched to take tactical measures in response.
The Chinese military had reportedly told South Korea that it would be carrying out routine training prior to entering the airspace, but the Joint Chiefs of Staff said it will have to investigate the situation.
“This incident seems to be a joint military drill between China and Russia but requires a further analysis,” the JCS said in a statement.
China and Russia have been contacted and directed to not let this happen again, Reuters reported.
This is not the first incident where Russian and Chinese aircraft appeared to be testing South Korea’s air defenses.
In July 2019, a joint patrol by Russian and Chinese bombers triggered a clash with South Korean fighter planes, The Wall Street Journal reported.
The bomber patrol flew over the waters between the Korean Peninsula and Japan, and other warplanes flew several miles outside South Korean airspace, according to the report.
Does this make you worried about future conflict in South Korea? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 84% (433 Votes) No: 16% (83 Votes)
South Korean pilots fired warning shots and flares in response to the incursion.
The United States has military bases in Japan and South Korea. Its regular drills with the South Korean military are often a cause for conflict with North Korea.
China, meanwhile, is growing increasingly aggressive.
After the July incident, Russia’s Defense Ministry denied violating the airspace and blamed South Korean fighters for engaging in dangerous maneuvers.
“South Korea has previously unsuccessfully tried to interfere with Russia’s flight above the neutral waters of the Sea of Japan,” the ministry said in a statement, according to The Journal.
Later, South Korean officials said Moscow had admitted the mistake and blamed it on a “technical glitch,” BBC reported.
“Moscow said if the aircraft flew according to an initially planned route, this incident would not have occurred,” a spokesman for the presidential Blue House, Yoon Do-han, said.
Russia, however, denied any intrusion even took place, according to the BBC.
Meanwhile, China Defense ministry spokesman Wu Qian defended the exercise and said his country “strictly abided by the relevant regulations of international law and did not enter the airspace of other countries,” the BBC reported.
A researcher at the Sejong Institute said the July flyover served as a warning, according to The Wall Street Journal.
“This is a message to the U.S., Japan, and South Korea: ‘If you strengthen the U.S.-Japan military alliance, we have no choice but to react militarily as well,” Hong Hyun-ik told the newspaper.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-22--Trump Admin Cranks Up the Pressure on Violent Syrian Regime Over Years of ‘Atrocities’

The Trump administration on Tuesday announced more sanctions on Syria , intensifying pressure on President Bashar Assad to end the country ’ s vicious , nearly decade-long conflict .
The sanctions target Syria ’ s central bank , an aide to Assad and others .
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said the United States was intent on “ holding accountable the Assad regime for the atrocities it has committed against its own people.
” “ The Treasury Department will continue to use all of its tools to expose those who stand with the Assad regime and enable these crimes to continue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The State Department and other international governments and independent rights groups say Assad and his regime are responsible for the killings of hundreds of thousands of civilians through aerial bombing campaigns , torture , armed attacks , hunger and other targeted campaigns .
The violence began when Assad ’ s fighters brutally quashed civilian protests during the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings .
The Treasury Department said the aim “ was to discourage future investment in government-controlled areas of Syria ” as part of the broader effort to compel Assad ’ s government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new sanctions also target Lina Mohammed Nazir al-Kinayeh , whom the Treasury identified as an official in Assad ’ s presidential office , her husband and their businesses , and others .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

The Trump administration on Tuesday announced more sanctions on Syria, intensifying pressure on President Bashar Assad to end the country’s vicious, nearly decade-long conflict.
The sanctions target Syria’s central bank, an aide to Assad and others.
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said the United States was intent on “holding accountable the Assad regime for the atrocities it has committed against its own people.”
“The Treasury Department will continue to use all of its tools to expose those who stand with the Assad regime and enable these crimes to continue,” Mnuchin said in a statement.
The State Department and other international governments and independent rights groups say Assad and his regime are responsible for the killings of hundreds of thousands of civilians through aerial bombing campaigns, torture, armed attacks, hunger and other targeted campaigns.
The violence began when Assad’s fighters brutally quashed civilian protests during the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings.
Tuesday’s announcement deepens sanctions on the central bank.
The Treasury Department said the aim “was to discourage future investment in government-controlled areas of Syria” as part of the broader effort to compel Assad’s government to end human rights violations.
Do you support these sanctions? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 94% (16 Votes) No: 6% (1 Votes)
The new sanctions also target Lina Mohammed Nazir al-Kinayeh, whom the Treasury identified as an official in Assad’s presidential office, her husband and their businesses, and others.
[jwplayer rxTu1Eph]
The Western Journal has reviewed this Associated Press story and may have altered it prior to publication to ensure that it meets our editorial standards.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-22--Pelosi Reveals Her Bizarre Plan To Get Trump Out of the White House: Report

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi sounded absolutely unhinged over the weekend when she discussed her plan for getting Donald Trump out of the White House , a new report suggests .
According to Politico , Pelosi told her leadership team as they strategized over coronavirus relief legislation that she plans to pull Trump “ out of there by his hair , his little hands and his feet.
” Obviously , Pelosi wasn ’ t speaking literally , but nevertheless , these reported comments made the California Democrat sound insane .
“ I ’ m counting down the hours ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pelosi reportedly said .
“ I plan to pull him out of there by his hair , his little hands and his feet.
” Remember , this is the president of the United States of America she ’ s talking about .
Just imagine , for one second , that someone had said this about Barack Obama when he was still in office .
If a Republican had made such threats against Obama , that person would have been condemned , likely by both parties .
However , because Pelosi is on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pass .
These reported comments are far from the only outlandish remarks Nancy Pelosi has made in recent days .
While speaking on the House floor Monday , Pelosi disparaged “ faith-oriented ” people on the right by saying they don ’ t believe in science .
“ People say around here sometimes , ‘ I ’ m faith-oriented so I don ’ t believe in science , ’ ” she claimed .
“ And I say , well , you can do both .
Science is an answer to our prayers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prayers have been answered with a vaccine.
” She then went on to debase the very real concept of herd immunity while making a series of similarly absurd claims about the Trump administration .
“ We couldn ’ t pass legislation until now because the administration simply did not believe in testing , tracing , treatment , wearing masks , sanitation , separation and the rest — scientific approach , ” Pelosi said .
One fact that seems to be lost on Pelosi in all of this is that the Trump-led Operation Warp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distribute a COVID-19 vaccine in record time .
If that doesn ’ t qualify as the work of a science-oriented president , nothing does .
Nevertheless , Pelosi and her Democratic cohorts will continue to obfuscate and take credit for the work of Donald Trump , all the while disparaging him and his supporters .
Let ’ s see how that strategy works out for Democrats in the 2022 elections .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi sounded absolutely unhinged over the weekend when she discussed her plan for getting Donald Trump out of the White House, a new report suggests.
According to Politico, Pelosi told her leadership team as they strategized over coronavirus relief legislation that she plans to pull Trump “out of there by his hair, his little hands and his feet.”
Obviously, Pelosi wasn’t speaking literally, but nevertheless, these reported comments made the California Democrat sound insane.
“I’m counting down the hours ‘til he’s gone,” Pelosi reportedly said.
“I plan to pull him out of there by his hair, his little hands and his feet.”
Remember, this is the president of the United States of America she’s talking about.
Just imagine, for one second, that someone had said this about Barack Obama when he was still in office.
If a Republican had made such threats against Obama, that person would have been condemned, likely by both parties.
Were Pelosi's reported comments over the top? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 99% (4948 Votes) No: 1% (38 Votes)
However, because Pelosi is on the left, she essentially gets a free pass.
These reported comments are far from the only outlandish remarks Nancy Pelosi has made in recent days.
While speaking on the House floor Monday, Pelosi disparaged “faith-oriented” people on the right by saying they don’t believe in science.
Fact check: nobody has ever said that https://t.co/g69hkfxguz — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) December 21, 2020
“People say around here sometimes, ‘I’m faith-oriented so I don’t believe in science,’” she claimed.
“And I say, well, you can do both. Science is an answer to our prayers,” Pelosi said.
“And our prayers have been answered with a vaccine.”
She then went on to debase the very real concept of herd immunity while making a series of similarly absurd claims about the Trump administration.
“We couldn’t pass legislation until now because the administration simply did not believe in testing, tracing, treatment, wearing masks, sanitation, separation and the rest — scientific approach,” Pelosi said.
One fact that seems to be lost on Pelosi in all of this is that the Trump-led Operation Warp Speed was responsible for helping develop and distribute a COVID-19 vaccine in record time.
If that doesn’t qualify as the work of a science-oriented president, nothing does.
Nevertheless, Pelosi and her Democratic cohorts will continue to obfuscate and take credit for the work of Donald Trump, all the while disparaging him and his supporters.
Let’s see how that strategy works out for Democrats in the 2022 elections.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-22--Major City Sues Black Lives Matter Leaders for ‘Civil Conspiracy’

In at least one city , the fighting in the streets over the summer has evolved into conflict in the courts .
The city of Detroit has filed a countersuit against Black Lives Matter leaders , alleging the demonstrators who took to the streets following the death of George Floyd are part of a “ civil conspiracy.
” According to the countersuit , the Detroit demonstrators “ conspired to disturb the peace , engage in disorderly conduct , incite riots , destroy public property , resist or obstruct officers in charge of duty , or otherwise commit acts of violence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also says protesters “ defamed ” the mayor and police and asked the court to award the city damages .
The counter-complaint was filed in September , but is getting new attention thanks to an article sympathetic to the protesters that was published by the website The Intercept on Monday .
The suit is the first of its kind since the Black Lives Matter movement swept the country this summer , The Intercept reported .
It came in response to an August complaint from the Black Lives Matter movement collective Detroit Will Breathe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unreasonable , and excessive force ” when they tried to control the protests and asked a judge to keep police from using “ tools of excessive force.
” In September , a federal court issued temporary orders restricting the use of force , like chemical weapons , sound cannons and rubber bullets , and the city responded with its countersuit .
The countersuit from the Detroit Police Department , Chief James Craig , the City of Detroit and Mayor Michael Duggan states the activists “ falsely characterized [ Detroit police ] officers ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the suit points to a tweet from leader Nakia Wallace about the “ murderous and brutal nature of the Detroit Police Department.
” The city also accused the movement of pushing a “ false narrative to rile the public ” in its discussions of the shooting of 20-year-old Hakim Littleton — a case in which police say that body and dashcam footage “ shows the man fire a gun at an officer before police shot him.
” Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib , a Democrat and member of the group known as the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a November opinion piece in the Detroit Free Press .
RELATED : Joe Biden Snaps at Reporter Who Asks About Hunter “ It is as disturbing as it is heartbreaking that in 2020 , in a city where every corner is a reminder of those fights for racial , economic and social justice , city and police leaders are meeting protesters with violence and intimidating rhetoric meant to turn the public against our own young people who are demanding a better future for us all , ” she wrote .
“ It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ took an oath of office to serve the people are aiding and abetting in their suppression.
” In an interview with The Intercept , protest leader Tristan Taylor said the city ’ s actions “ are a way of attempting to minimize our ability to go on the offensive and call for transparency and accountability.
” Craig responded to the court ’ s initial temporary orders in an interview with Fox News .
“ When you resist , and there is video that supports our claim , I mean , you can see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grabbing on officers so they can free their comrades from being arrested .
That ’ s not peaceful , ” Craig said .
“ That ’ s resisting a lawful arrest .
The judge also includes arrests must be made on probable cause .
That ’ s exactly what we were doing , and so , I ’ m confident we ’ re going to continue to move forward.
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

In at least one city, the fighting in the streets over the summer has evolved into conflict in the courts.
The city of Detroit has filed a countersuit against Black Lives Matter leaders, alleging the demonstrators who took to the streets following the death of George Floyd are part of a “civil conspiracy.”
According to the countersuit, the Detroit demonstrators “conspired to disturb the peace, engage in disorderly conduct, incite riots, destroy public property, resist or obstruct officers in charge of duty, or otherwise commit acts of violence” against police officers.
The countersuit also says protesters “defamed” the mayor and police and asked the court to award the city damages.
The counter-complaint was filed in September, but is getting new attention thanks to an article sympathetic to the protesters that was published by the website The Intercept on Monday.
The suit is the first of its kind since the Black Lives Matter movement swept the country this summer, The Intercept reported.
It came in response to an August complaint from the Black Lives Matter movement collective Detroit Will Breathe that alleged police used “unnecessary, unreasonable, and excessive force” when they tried to control the protests and asked a judge to keep police from using “tools of excessive force.”
In September, a federal court issued temporary orders restricting the use of force, like chemical weapons, sound cannons and rubber bullets, and the city responded with its countersuit.
The countersuit from the Detroit Police Department, Chief James Craig, the City of Detroit and Mayor Michael Duggan states the activists “falsely characterized [Detroit police] officers” in Twitter statements.
In particular, the suit points to a tweet from leader Nakia Wallace about the “murderous and brutal nature of the Detroit Police Department.”
I can’t for the life of me understand the type of person who has not yet woken up to understand the murderous and brutal nature of the Detroit Police Department. ? Another Black Man Was Lynched last night. — Nakia Wallace (@NakiaRWallace) July 24, 2020
The city also accused the movement of pushing a “false narrative to rile the public” in its discussions of the shooting of 20-year-old Hakim Littleton — a case in which police say that body and dashcam footage “shows the man fire a gun at an officer before police shot him.”
Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat and member of the group known as the “squad,” responded to the countersuit in a November opinion piece in the Detroit Free Press.
Do you think more cities will follow Detroit's example? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 94% (2948 Votes) No: 6% (200 Votes)
“It is as disturbing as it is heartbreaking that in 2020, in a city where every corner is a reminder of those fights for racial, economic and social justice, city and police leaders are meeting protesters with violence and intimidating rhetoric meant to turn the public against our own young people who are demanding a better future for us all,” she wrote.
“It is even more appalling that those who took an oath of office to serve the people are aiding and abetting in their suppression.”
In an interview with The Intercept, protest leader Tristan Taylor said the city’s actions “are a way of attempting to minimize our ability to go on the offensive and call for transparency and accountability.”
Craig responded to the court’s initial temporary orders in an interview with Fox News.
“When you resist, and there is video that supports our claim, I mean, you can see in the video where protesters are literally grabbing on officers so they can free their comrades from being arrested. That’s not peaceful,” Craig said.
“That’s resisting a lawful arrest. The judge also includes arrests must be made on probable cause. That’s exactly what we were doing, and so, I’m confident we’re going to continue to move forward.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


Orange Man Good

For more A.F .
Branco cartoons , go to WesternJournal.com/cartoons .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all @ @ @ @ @ our editorial standards .

Bradley Cooper's latest role has not gone down well with everyone, particularly with regard to his use of a prosthetic nose.


westernjournal--2020-12-22--Rand Paul Slams ‘So-Called Conservatives’ While Opposing COVID Bill on Senate Floor

Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky on Monday denounced the $ 900 billion COVID-19 relief legislation that was later passed by the Senate as “ free money ” that will doom future generations to drown in the nation ’ s debt .
The bill was approved 92-6 , with Paul joined in opposition by Republican Sens .
Rick Scott of Florida , Mike Lee of Utah , Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee , Ted Cruz of Texas and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin , according to Fox News .
In a floor speech on Monday , the libertarian-leaning Paul said the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ today is not just a deficits-don ’ t-matter disaster , it is everything Republicans say they don ’ t believe in.
” Paul said the bill is rooted in the concept that deficits do not matter .
“ Most Republicans rightly lampoon this quackery — that is , when they ’ re not practicing the quackery themselves , ” he said .
TRENDING : Joe Biden 's Niece Caroline Receives Zero Jail Time After Pleading Guilty to DUI “ This bill is free money for everyone , ” he said .
“ Proponents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re fully employed , or own your own house , or own your own business .
‘ Free money for everyone , ’ they cry .
And yet , if free money were the answer , if money really grew on trees , why not give more free money ?
Why not give it out all the time ?
” Paul said .
In a speech laden with sarcasm , Paul said if the goal of the legislation was to dole out as many dollars as possible , the limits it included should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 600 a person ?
Why not $ 1,000 ?
Why not $ 2,000 ?
Maybe these new free-money Republicans should join the Everybody-Gets-a-Guaranteed-Income Caucus ?
Why not $ 20,000 a year for everybody , why not $ 30,000 ?
” he asked .
“ If we can print up money with impunity , why not do it ?
” Paul said .
“ The Treasury can just keep printing the money .
That is , until somebody points out that the emperor has no clothes and that the dollar no longer has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bill ’ s passage are great .
“ To so-called conservatives who are quick to identify the socialism of Democrats : If you vote for this spending monstrosity , you are no better , ” Paul said .
RELATED : Rand Paul : Masks Mandates Are 'All About Submission ’ “ When you vote to pass out free money , you lose your soul and you abandon forever any semblance of moral or fiscal integrity.
” Paul continued his attack on the bill on Twitter .
In his speech , Paul noted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spend what he termed “ tomorrow ’ s money.
” “ We are $ 27 trillion in debt today .
How do we expect a child to have the economic opportunity when this crushing debt is their inheritance from Congress ?
” he said .
Paul later said that America needs less government , not more , to recover .
“ It ’ s clear that government has worsened the economic damage and acted as the biggest obstacle to economic recovery , ” he said .
And Congress is making it worse , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and worsening this debt crisis , in part , because too many governors and mayors have imposed heavy-handed restrictions that crush business , ” Paul said .
“ It isn ’ t the pandemic that ’ s killing the economy , it ’ s the government ’ s over-zealous response that is killing the economy .
The pandemic itself was disruptive , but Congress is being asked to help perpetuate these lockdowns , ” he added .
“ Every bailout dollar printed and passed out to the governors only allows these tinpot dictators @ @ @ @ @ @ @ committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky on Monday denounced the $900 billion COVID-19 relief legislation that was later passed by the Senate as “free money” that will doom future generations to drown in the nation’s debt.
The bill was approved 92-6, with Paul joined in opposition by Republican Sens. Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah, Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Ted Cruz of Texas and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, according to Fox News.
In a floor speech on Monday, the libertarian-leaning Paul said the “monstrous spending bill we are presented with today is not just a deficits-don’t-matter disaster, it is everything Republicans say they don’t believe in.”
Paul said the bill is rooted in the concept that deficits do not matter.
“Most Republicans rightly lampoon this quackery — that is, when they’re not practicing the quackery themselves,” he said.
“This bill is free money for everyone,” he said.
“Proponents don’t care if you’re fully employed, or own your own house, or own your own business. ‘Free money for everyone,’ they cry. And yet, if free money were the answer, if money really grew on trees, why not give more free money? Why not give it out all the time?” Paul said.
In a speech laden with sarcasm, Paul said if the goal of the legislation was to dole out as many dollars as possible, the limits it included should be raised.
Do you agree with Sen. Rand Paul? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 96% (2186 Votes) No: 4% (80 Votes)
“Why stop at $600 a person? Why not $1,000? Why not $2,000? Maybe these new free-money Republicans should join the Everybody-Gets-a-Guaranteed-Income Caucus? Why not $20,000 a year for everybody, why not $30,000?” he asked.
“If we can print up money with impunity, why not do it?” Paul said.
“The Treasury can just keep printing the money. That is, until somebody points out that the emperor has no clothes and that the dollar no longer has value.”
Paul said the stakes of the bill’s passage are great.
“To so-called conservatives who are quick to identify the socialism of Democrats: If you vote for this spending monstrosity, you are no better,” Paul said.
“When you vote to pass out free money, you lose your soul and you abandon forever any semblance of moral or fiscal integrity.”
Paul continued his attack on the bill on Twitter.
Great news: Congress will, in 3 years, quit sending stimulus checks to dead people!!! Strong work, Congress (sarcasm intended). Until then, the dead will continue to vote and to cash government checks. Wouldn’t want to rush something like that… — Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) December 22, 2020
In his speech, Paul noted that the nation cannot afford to spend what he termed “tomorrow’s money.”
“We are $27 trillion in debt today. How do we expect a child to have the economic opportunity when this crushing debt is their inheritance from Congress?” he said.
Paul later said that America needs less government, not more, to recover.
“It’s clear that government has worsened the economic damage and acted as the biggest obstacle to economic recovery,” he said.
And Congress is making it worse, he argued.
“We are borrowing and worsening this debt crisis, in part, because too many governors and mayors have imposed heavy-handed restrictions that crush business,” Paul said.
“It isn’t the pandemic that’s killing the economy, it’s the government’s over-zealous response that is killing the economy. The pandemic itself was disruptive, but Congress is being asked to help perpetuate these lockdowns,” he added.
“Every bailout dollar printed and passed out to the governors only allows these tinpot dictators to perpetuate the lockdowns.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-22--Dem New Mexico Sheriff Says He Will Not Enforce Orders That ‘Subvert Your Constitutional Rights’

A Democratic sheriff in New Mexico said he will not enforce any “ overreaching ” and “ oppressive ” coronavirus mandates .
In a moving video posted Friday , Bernalillo County Sheriff Manuel Gonzales said he sympathizes with the numerous families and small-business owners whose lives have been crushed by the panic-induced shutdowns .
“ This year , my office listened to numerous citizens concerned about what has been categorized as ‘ oppressive lockdown mandates , ’ ” the Marine Corps veteran said .
Gonzales said New Mexico ’ s draconian coronavirus restrictions “ significantly impacted countless New Mexicans ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he said his office will focus on pursuing actual criminals instead of harassing law-abiding Americans .
“ Some elected officeholders have prioritized turning everyday citizens into villains for simply attempting to live their lives in the pursuit of happiness , ” said Gonzales , who has worked in the Bernalillo County Sheriff ’ s Department for 24 years .
“ It is my opinion that the resources of the sheriff ’ s office should be focused on making our communities safe and more prosperous for everyday citizens , ” he said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the Bernalillo County citizens , I choose to direct this agency ’ s time and resources toward enforcing the laws deemed to keep the people free of crime.
” Democratic Gov .
Michelle Lujan Grisham has imposed strict coronavirus lockdown orders in New Mexico , including a two-week statewide shutdown over the Thanksgiving holidays .
But Gonzales said he will not enforce any infringements on people ’ s civil liberties .
“ Overreaching restrictions will only hurt our community , ” the sheriff said .
“ For that reason , we will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ subvert your constitutional rights , ” Gonzales said .
“ Therefore , my agency ’ s focus will continue to be public safety , apprehending actual criminals and not harassing everyday citizens attempting to make a life for themselves and their families in Bernalillo County.
” Sheriff Manuel Gonzales joins a growing chorus of Democratic law enforcement officials who are openly defying the oppressive coronavirus lockdowns mandated by their party ’ s leaders .
Last week , a Pennsylvania sheriff announced that he and his county ’ s district attorney — who were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , citing the Democrats ’ unreasonable lockdowns and “ defund the police ” hysteria .
RELATED : Second Wave of American Lockdowns Begin as State Orders 2-Week Quarantine for All Residents Fayette County Sheriff James Custer said his state ’ s “ unconstitutional ” coronavirus restrictions — coupled with the Democrats ’ escalating anti-police rhetoric and embrace of socialism — cemented his decision .
Custer said he refused to enforce Pennsylvania ’ s oppressive mandates because they run counter to his duty as a sheriff , which is to “ uphold and defend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fayette County District Attorney Rich Bower also abandoned the Democratic Party and joined the GOP for the same reasons , the Herald-Standard reported .
Bower blasted Democrats for fomenting anti-police animus , saying their incitement of riots and lawlessness was “ totally contrary to what we believe and our values ” as law enforcement officials .
In September , another Pennsylvania sheriff — also a lifelong Democrat — endorsed President Donald Trump and switched parties , saying the Democrats have shifted so far left he no longer recognized the party .
“ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the news media with the protests , the riots , the looting , burning , assaults on law enforcement … the silence of the Democratic Party was deafening , ” Albert said .
Did you know that The Western Journal now publishes some content in Spanish as well as English , for international audiences ?
Click here to read this article on The Western Journal en Español !
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

A Democratic sheriff in New Mexico said he will not enforce any “overreaching” and “oppressive” coronavirus mandates.
In a moving video posted Friday, Bernalillo County Sheriff Manuel Gonzales said he sympathizes with the numerous families and small-business owners whose lives have been crushed by the panic-induced shutdowns.
“This year, my office listened to numerous citizens concerned about what has been categorized as ‘oppressive lockdown mandates,’” the Marine Corps veteran said.
Gonzales said New Mexico’s draconian coronavirus restrictions “significantly impacted countless New Mexicans’ livelihoods, health and well-being.”
Accordingly, he said his office will focus on pursuing actual criminals instead of harassing law-abiding Americans.
“Some elected officeholders have prioritized turning everyday citizens into villains for simply attempting to live their lives in the pursuit of happiness,” said Gonzales, who has worked in the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Department for 24 years.
“It is my opinion that the resources of the sheriff’s office should be focused on making our communities safe and more prosperous for everyday citizens,” he said. “As the sheriff, duly elected by the Bernalillo County citizens, I choose to direct this agency’s time and resources toward enforcing the laws deemed to keep the people free of crime.”
Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham has imposed strict coronavirus lockdown orders in New Mexico, including a two-week statewide shutdown over the Thanksgiving holidays.
Do you agree with the sheriff's decision not to enforce coronavirus mandates? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 99% (317 Votes) No: 1% (2 Votes)
But Gonzales said he will not enforce any infringements on people’s civil liberties.
“Overreaching restrictions will only hurt our community,” the sheriff said.
“For that reason, we will not follow along with any orders that subvert your constitutional rights,” Gonzales said. “Therefore, my agency’s focus will continue to be public safety, apprehending actual criminals and not harassing everyday citizens attempting to make a life for themselves and their families in Bernalillo County.”
Sheriff Manuel Gonzales joins a growing chorus of Democratic law enforcement officials who are openly defying the oppressive coronavirus lockdowns mandated by their party’s leaders.
Last week, a Pennsylvania sheriff announced that he and his county’s district attorney — who were both lifelong Democrats — had switched parties, citing the Democrats’ unreasonable lockdowns and “defund the police” hysteria.
Fayette County Sheriff James Custer said his state’s “unconstitutional” coronavirus restrictions — coupled with the Democrats’ escalating anti-police rhetoric and embrace of socialism — cemented his decision.
The sheriff declared lockdown mandates ‘unconstitutional.’ https://t.co/CSEwPstyzt — The Western Journal (@WestJournalism) December 15, 2020
Custer said he refused to enforce Pennsylvania’s oppressive mandates because they run counter to his duty as a sheriff, which is to “uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Fayette County District Attorney Rich Bower also abandoned the Democratic Party and joined the GOP for the same reasons, the Herald-Standard reported.
Bower blasted Democrats for fomenting anti-police animus, saying their incitement of riots and lawlessness was “totally contrary to what we believe and our values” as law enforcement officials.
In September, another Pennsylvania sheriff — also a lifelong Democrat — endorsed President Donald Trump and switched parties, saying the Democrats have shifted so far left he no longer recognized the party.
“I didn’t leave the Democratic Party, it left me,” Westmoreland County Sheriff James Albert told Fox News’ “Fox & Friends Weekend.”
“The past few months with the goings-on in the news media with the protests, the riots, the looting, burning, assaults on law enforcement … the silence of the Democratic Party was deafening,” Albert said.
Did you know that The Western Journal now publishes some content in Spanish as well as English, for international audiences? Click here to read this article on The Western Journal en Español!
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-22--‘Squad’ Member Claims Inmates Should Be Prioritized for COVID Vaccine

Lawbreakers should move to the head of the line for the COVID-19 vaccine , according to one member of the House coterie of progressives who call themselves the “ squad.
” Democratic Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts said inmates deserve to be vaccinated due to the spread of COVID behind bars .
“ I ’ m going to continue to fight for our most vulnerable — communities who have been disproportionately impacted by the virus , for our health care workers , for our essential workers , for incarcerated men and women to be prioritized in the distribution of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CNN interview Sunday , according to Fox News .
Pressley had earlier tweeted her advocacy for inmates who remain behind bars even after the initial spread of the virus resulted in prisoners being released .
“ Covid-19 is rampant in our prisons , jails and detention centers .
Incarcerated individuals must be prioritized once a vaccine is available , ” she tweeted , linking to a commentary piece on NBC that called for vaccinating inmates .
That commentary argued , in part , that “ Vaccines need to reach people in ways that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those trapped within the prison and jail systems.
” Pressley has said the virus has “ raged out of control , ” blaming President Donald Trump and his Republican allies .
It “ has everything to do with the willful criminality of Donald Trump and I would add even his GOP-led senate .
They have dragged their feet on making the investments necessary to meet the scale and scope of this hurt and to invest in contact tracing and things like that , ” she told CNN .
Washington , D.C. , Mayor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also said that she believes inmates and homeless individuals should have top priority for the vaccine , according to The Washington Free Beacon .
But Democratic Colorado Gov .
Jared Polis is breaking with the progressive wing of his party on the issue .
“ There ’ s no way that prisoners are going to get it before members of a vulnerable population , ” Polis said , according to the Free Beacon .
“ There ’ s no way it ’ s going to go to prisoners before it goes to people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That ’ s obvious.
” However , Massachusetts will make inmates a priority group , according to The New York Times .
Dr. Simone Wildes , an infectious disease specialist who is on the COVID-19 vaccine advisory group , indicated it was part of the state ’ s effort to focus the vaccine on minority groups , The Times reported .
RELATED : Biden Selects Figure Loathed by Ocasio-Cortez , Omar and Tlaib for Key Role “ We used equity as a core principle in our recommendations , ” Wildes told the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lot of cases of COVID in the prisons , and we wanted to make sure those at highest risk were getting the vaccine first.
” “ Those at greatest need — we have to take care of them , ” Wildes said .
“ You can ’ t socially distance in prison.
” Carol Rose , executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts , said freeing inmates is also essential .
“ Prisons and jails are just petri dishes for the coronavirus , ” she said .
“ We need @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who aren ’ t a danger to society , so more people are alive to receive the vaccine when it becomes available.
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Lawbreakers should move to the head of the line for the COVID-19 vaccine, according to one member of the House coterie of progressives who call themselves the “squad.”
Democratic Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts said inmates deserve to be vaccinated due to the spread of COVID behind bars.
“I’m going to continue to fight for our most vulnerable — communities who have been disproportionately impacted by the virus, for our health care workers, for our essential workers, for incarcerated men and women to be prioritized in the distribution of the vaccine,” she said in a CNN interview Sunday, according to Fox News.
Pressley had earlier tweeted her advocacy for inmates who remain behind bars even after the initial spread of the virus resulted in prisoners being released.
COVID-19 is rampant in our prisons, jails, and detention centers. Incarcerated individuals must be prioritized once a vaccine is available.https://t.co/T1wqYTcAgc — Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (@RepPressley) December 11, 2020
“Covid-19 is rampant in our prisons, jails and detention centers. Incarcerated individuals must be prioritized once a vaccine is available,” she tweeted, linking to a commentary piece on NBC that called for vaccinating inmates.
That commentary argued, in part, that “Vaccines need to reach people in ways that uplift the common dignity and humanity of those trapped within the prison and jail systems.”
Pressley has said the virus has “raged out of control,” blaming President Donald Trump and his Republican allies.
It “has everything to do with the willful criminality of Donald Trump and I would add even his GOP-led senate. They have dragged their feet on making the investments necessary to meet the scale and scope of this hurt and to invest in contact tracing and things like that,” she told CNN.
Should prison inmates get priority in receiving the coronavirus vaccine? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 4% (3 Votes) No: 96% (65 Votes)
Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, has also said that she believes inmates and homeless individuals should have top priority for the vaccine, according to The Washington Free Beacon.
But Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis is breaking with the progressive wing of his party on the issue.
“There’s no way that prisoners are going to get it before members of a vulnerable population,” Polis said, according to the Free Beacon. “There’s no way it’s going to go to prisoners before it goes to people who haven’t committed any crime. That’s obvious.”
However, Massachusetts will make inmates a priority group, according to The New York Times.
Dr. Simone Wildes, an infectious disease specialist who is on the COVID-19 vaccine advisory group, indicated it was part of the state’s effort to focus the vaccine on minority groups, The Times reported.
“We used equity as a core principle in our recommendations,” Wildes told the newspaper. “We have had a lot of cases of COVID in the prisons, and we wanted to make sure those at highest risk were getting the vaccine first.”
“Those at greatest need — we have to take care of them,” Wildes said. “You can’t socially distance in prison.”
Carol Rose, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, said freeing inmates is also essential.
“Prisons and jails are just petri dishes for the coronavirus,” she said. “We need to reduce incarceration levels and release people who aren’t a danger to society, so more people are alive to receive the vaccine when it becomes available.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


westernjournal--2020-12-22--NYC Restaurants Join Together for Incredible Takedown of Andrew Cuomo

If Andrew Cuomo wants to pull a Gavin Newsom in New York City , there are a lot of restaurants looking to make it harder for him .
According to the Washington Examiner , a group of Gotham restaurants have joined together on social media to ban the state ’ s governor from their establishments over his lockdown policies .
“ He can eat at some sh—y roadside diner outside of Albany but he will not be served anywhere in New York City , known universally as the world ’ s greatest dining destination !
” bar owner Larry Baird @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If he has to use the restroom he can go pee on my street corner !
That ’ s what he wants anyway !
” Cuomo had reintroduced a ban on indoor dining in New York City earlier this month despite protests from the city ’ s eateries and bars .
“ In New York City , you put the CDC caution on indoor dining together with the rate of transmission and the density and the crowding , that is a bad situation , ” Gov .
Cuomo said Dec. 11 , according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is painful .
So many restaurants are struggling .
But we can ’ t allow this virus to reassert itself in our city , ” he said on Twitter .
New York City ’ s restauranteurs weren ’ t thrilled with this turn of events : “ This action will inevitably result in massive layoffs and vast closures right before the holidays , ” Melissa Fleischut , president and CEO of the New York State Restaurant Association , said in a statement .
She added the decision was a “ huge blow ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Bill de Blasio Says NYC Schools ' Goal Is To 'Redistribute Wealth' Danny Presti , owner of Mac ’ s Public House , has gotten desperate enough that he ’ s giving his food and drink away for free after an arrest earlier in December for breaking the lockdown orders .
“ It doesn ’ t seem like we can do business , ” he said .
“ So here ’ s what we ’ re going to do for everybody : We ’ re going to give away everything for free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mac ’ s Public House , and you can eat for free and you can drink for free .
We just ask that you do make a donation toward us so that we can still pay our bills.
” “ We refuse to abide by any rules and regulations put forth by the Mayor of NYC and the Governor of NY State , ” a sign in the bar ’ s window read .
Philippe Massoud , who owns Lebanese-American restaurant ilili in Midtown Manhattan , said that the restrictions would reduce his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what they were .
“ It ’ s going to be very , very difficult , ” said Massoud , a Lebanese immigrant .
“ I lived through 14 years of civil war , so it ’ s going to take a lot to extinguish me .
But this is very trying.
” He also wondered what would happen to restaurant workers who couldn ’ t make it in New York City .
“ If you can ’ t eat out in the city and you can ’ t have a semblance of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be in the city ?
” he said .
“ When social life and dining-out life is extinguished in the city , it ’ s no longer a city.
” If the members of NYC Restaurants Open on Facebook have anything to say about it , it won ’ t be a city where Cuomo can eat out anytime soon .
According to The Coney Island Blog , members of the group are supporting an “ executive order ” banning the governor from city eateries .
“ Completely schizophrenic behavior !
How are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ beyond any logical reasoning , ” one member said .
“ While I do not live in NYC or own a restaurant there or anywhere else in the US , I feel your pain , ” another commenter said .
“ I say the Cuomo ban should extend to ALL of his family members not only in NYC or NY State , but nationwide .
Should also do the same for de Blasio and his family.
” “ Why don ’ t you all just band together and stay open ?
” another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you with the liquor license .
You lose that you ’ re done and that dirtbag Cuomo knows it , ” a commenter remarked . )
How many restaurants are going to band together in the effort — and how long it lasts — is anyone ’ s guess .
What is clear is that , when this is all over , the governor isn ’ t going to be welcomed into his state ’ s biggest city with open arms , particularly by the hospitality industry .
We are committed to truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Read our editorial standards .

If Andrew Cuomo wants to pull a Gavin Newsom in New York City, there are a lot of restaurants looking to make it harder for him.
According to the Washington Examiner, a group of Gotham restaurants have joined together on social media to ban the state’s governor from their establishments over his lockdown policies.
“He can eat at some sh—y roadside diner outside of Albany but he will not be served anywhere in New York City, known universally as the world’s greatest dining destination!” bar owner Larry Baird told The Coney Island Blog.
“If he has to use the restroom he can go pee on my street corner! That’s what he wants anyway!”
Cuomo had reintroduced a ban on indoor dining in New York City earlier this month despite protests from the city’s eateries and bars.
“In New York City, you put the CDC caution on indoor dining together with the rate of transmission and the density and the crowding, that is a bad situation,” Gov. Cuomo said Dec. 11, according to The Associated Press.
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio supported the decision.
“This is painful. So many restaurants are struggling. But we can’t allow this virus to reassert itself in our city,” he said on Twitter.
As #COVID19 indicators continue to rise, it’s time to shut down indoor dining. This is painful. So many restaurants are struggling. But we can’t allow this virus to reassert itself in our city. I fully support @NYGovCuomo‘s decision. Together we’ll fight back this second wave. https://t.co/NWY9xmjGdh — Mayor Bill de Blasio (@NYCMayor) December 11, 2020
New York City’s restauranteurs weren’t thrilled with this turn of events:
Who is going to sit outside, 36 Degrees and snowing. Are you guys ok making these decisions? If you shut down , just shut down all. ( im a restaurant owner ). Because of outdoor dining, we spent $ 7000 to make this. pic.twitter.com/oAW7xtTsUj — Mark Erdo (@MurattiGs) December 11, 2020
“This action will inevitably result in massive layoffs and vast closures right before the holidays,” Melissa Fleischut, president and CEO of the New York State Restaurant Association, said in a statement.
She added the decision was a “huge blow” and “unfair and devastating.”
Danny Presti, owner of Mac’s Public House, has gotten desperate enough that he’s giving his food and drink away for free after an arrest earlier in December for breaking the lockdown orders.
“It doesn’t seem like we can do business,” he said. “So here’s what we’re going to do for everybody: We’re going to give away everything for free. So now you can come to Mac’s Public House, and you can eat for free and you can drink for free. We just ask that you do make a donation toward us so that we can still pay our bills.”
“We refuse to abide by any rules and regulations put forth by the Mayor of NYC and the Governor of NY State,” a sign in the bar’s window read.
Philippe Massoud, who owns Lebanese-American restaurant ilili in Midtown Manhattan, said that the restrictions would reduce his revenues to 8 to 15 percent of what they were.
“It’s going to be very, very difficult,” said Massoud, a Lebanese immigrant. “I lived through 14 years of civil war, so it’s going to take a lot to extinguish me. But this is very trying.”
He also wondered what would happen to restaurant workers who couldn’t make it in New York City.
“If you can’t eat out in the city and you can’t have a semblance of life, why are you going to be in the city?” he said. “When social life and dining-out life is extinguished in the city, it’s no longer a city.”
Should restaurants defy Cuomo's orders and stay open for indoor dining? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 99% (1128 Votes) No: 1% (12 Votes)
If the members of NYC Restaurants Open on Facebook have anything to say about it, it won’t be a city where Cuomo can eat out anytime soon. According to The Coney Island Blog, members of the group are supporting an “executive order” banning the governor from city eateries.
“Completely schizophrenic behavior! How are they coming up with these rules is beyond any logical reasoning,” one member said.
“While I do not live in NYC or own a restaurant there or anywhere else in the US, I feel your pain,” another commenter said. “I say the Cuomo ban should extend to ALL of his family members not only in NYC or NY State, but nationwide. Should also do the same for de Blasio and his family.”
“Why don’t you all just band together and stay open?” another individual asked. (“They threaten you with the liquor license. You lose that you’re done and that dirtbag Cuomo knows it,” a commenter remarked.)
How many restaurants are going to band together in the effort — and how long it lasts — is anyone’s guess. What is clear is that, when this is all over, the governor isn’t going to be welcomed into his state’s biggest city with open arms, particularly by the hospitality industry.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.