thegatewaypundit--2020-12-23--EXCLUSIVE: Roger Stone on ‘The Special Counsel’s Redacted Justice’

Late in the night on election day 2020 , just hours before the legal deadline imposed , the U.S. Department of Justice complied with a federal court decision ordering it to release the last remaining redacted sections of the so-called ‘ Mueller Report ’ that had been hidden since the report ’ s publication nearly 18 months earlier .
TRENDING : JUST IN : President Trump Announces 26 New Christmas Pardons Including Paul Manafort and Roger Stone At midnight on election day November 3rd , 2020- the busiest news day of the year and timed to get as little press @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department of Justice released the remaining unredacted sections of the Mueller Report regarding me specifically , in which they had admitted that despite two years of intense investigation , spending millions to pour through every aspect of my life , dragging 36 witnesses to the grand jury and after obtaining all my electronic communications for four years ( literally millions of e-mails and pages of documents , tax returns , banking and financial records –they found no factual evidence of any collaboration or coordination between me and WikiLeaks regarding the release of emails @ @ @ @ @ @ @ committee or Hillary Clinton or that I had any advance knowledge of the timing , content or source of their disclosures ) .
Even BuzzFeed , who won the release of the data in a lawsuit actually said I was “ vindicated ” .
The rest of the media ?
They reported nothing at all .
The report is a voluminous effort by the ‘ Special ’ Counsel ’ s unethical , if not criminally-corrupt , lawyers , as their prolonged , baseless , partisan-motivated legal fishing expedition finally came to an end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the public that the entire corrupt multi-year multi-million dollar boondoggle was in reality a malicious fraud against President Donald Trump and anyone who supported him and a runaway purveyor of kangaroo “ justice ” against its unfortunate political targets .
For it ’ s hundreds of pages tediously propping up a convoluted defamatory narrative now known to be nothing more than a brazen fabrication by the Democrat Party and Hillary Clinton ’ s failed presidential campaign , the report is rife with highly-parsed wording , deceitful innuendo , and presumptuous , conclusory leaps @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minutiae , engaging in misleading factual cherry-picking and employing officious-sounding spin as dishonest substitutes for evidence that never existed .
Despite this sugar-coating what the unredacted documents do show is shocking .
Judge Amy Berman withheld this from my lawyers at trial .
The Mueller ’ s dirty cops concluded in their report that even if they had found evidence that I had received documents from Assange of WikiLeaks and passed them to anyone , which I did not and for which they found no evidence whatsoever , it would not have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hoax .
For three years the fake News media has insisted that Julian Assange ( a journalist who has never had the accuracy of anything he has published questioned ) is actually an asset for the Russians and that his website Wikileaks got the documents and e-mails via a hack via the Russians .
Worse they insisted that I had served as the link between Assange and WikiLeaks and the Trump campaign .
I was called a traitor and a Russian spy .
The left insisted that my colorful Twitter feed and some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I had advance knowledge of the source and content of the WikiLeaks disclosures that so roiled the 2016 campaign .
I was falsely accused of having advance knowledge of the publication of John Podesta ’ s e-mails .
The only three news outlets who reported on this shocking election day admission that there was no evidence found that would support this narrative were BuzzFeed , who successfully brought the lawsuit for the release of this material , the Washington Examiner and ZeroHedge .
Where were the the Washington Post , the Wall Street @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Atlantic , The Hill , Politico , Salon , Vox , Vice , CNN , MSNBC , NBC and the Business Insider – all of who were quick to smear me as a “ go-between for WikiLeaks and the Trump Campaign ” but none of whom reported on the stunning conclusions of Mueller ’ s thugs .
It is important to note that the only communication I had with Wikileaks was via Twitter direct message and was fully disclosed and supplied to the House Intelligence Committee at the time of my testimony in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yet Mueller ’ s thugs tried to pretend it was some kind of bombshell .
The media lynch mob that smeared me is a typical example of the bias and the fraudulence of the corporately-owned fake news media .
The headlines below reflect just a small sample of the inaccurate and malicious reporting by the fake news media .
Everyone of these stories is disproven by the November 3rd disclosure by the US Department of Justice .
Every one of these stories includes fundamental falsehoods , Inaccurate leaks from the Special Counsel ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ facts , and the relentless pushing of an entire false narrative .
NY TIMES – Indicting Roger Stone , Mueller Shows Link Between Trump Campaign and Wikileaks NY TIMES – Roger Stone Sold Himself to Trump ’ s Campaign as a WikiLeaks Pipeline .
Was He ?
NY TIMES – Roger Stone Was in Contact With Julian Assange in 2017 , documents show NY TIMES – Stone Trial Links Trump More Closely to 2016 Effort to Obtain Stolen Emails CNN – Mueller indicts Roger Stone , says he was coordinating with Trump officials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Special counsel prosecutors say they have communications of Stone with WikiLeaks The Guardian – I saw Roger Stone as ‘ access point ’ to WikiLeaks in 2016 , Bannon tells court Huffington Post – How WikiLeaks , Paul Manafort And Roger Stone Fit Into The Mueller Investigation Huffington Post – Roger Stone Pressed For Damaging Emails About Hillary Clinton From WikiLeaks : Report Business Insider & AP – FBI documents reveal that Roger Stone was in direct communication with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange Business Insider – Mueller is looking into a stunning claim @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a meeting with Julian Assange Business Insider – Roger Stone communicated with WikiLeaks about hacked Democratic emails , says Mueller investigation New York Intelligencer – Mueller Investigating Whether Roger Stone Had Dinner With Assange New York Intelligencer – Roger Stone Sought Clinton Emails From Assange in September 2016 New York Intelligencer – Roger Stone Knew in Advance About About the Stolen Emails .
Did He Tell Trump ?
Washington Post – The Roger Stone indictment fills in new details about WikiLeaks and the Trump campaign VICE – Why Roger Stone could be Mueller @ @ @ @ @ @ @ probe VICE – Roger Stone says he doesn ’ t “ think ” he discussed WikiLeaks with Paul Manafort MSNBC – Roger Stone Tried to Walk Back Claims About Julian Assange Sharon LaFrontiere of the New York Times , Roz Helderman of the Washington Post , Shelby Holliday of the Wall Street Journal , the odious Natasha Bertrand , then of Atlantic Magazine , now at Politico , the vile Jonathan Chiat of New York Magazine , Daniel Friedman at Mother Jones , Andrew Prokop of Vox , Sara Murray of CNN , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NBC propaghadist and long -time CIA plant Ken Dilanian , ( who was actually fired by the Chicago Tribune for clearing his stories with the Agency ) -are just a handful of the “ reporters ” who defamed me repeatedly with a torrent of lies and distortions , none of whom had the couresy or professionalism to report the Nov 3 disclosures which prove that virtually all of their reporting on my case and the Mueller witch hunt efforts to destroy me , were flawed , distorted and based on the fundamental principles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or corrected .
I won ’ t hold my breath .
It wasn ’ t just the nut jobs like Mother Jones , the Daily Beast , Salon and nutty bloggers like Marcy Wheeler but allegedly responsible media outlets like the New York Times , the Washington Post , the Wall Street Journal and CNN and MSNBC became obsessed with the idea that I was working with WikiLeaks and WikiLeaks was working with the Russians .
I often joke with some of my associates as to what newspaper in the United States is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the main stream media narrative in which they told us that the Trump campaign had colluded with Russian intelligence in the 2020 elections and repeatedly asserted the questionable claim by US Intelligence that Julian Assange was a Russian asset and that the Democratic National Committee ’ s servers were hacked by the Russians .
Not surprisingly , none of these reporters or outlets reported on the declassified documents ultimately liberated from the national security bureaucrats by acted DNI Director , Rick Grenell which prove that now not even Crowdstrike stands behind the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Russians hacked the DNC .
The intelligence services and the FBI knew from the beginning that the Steele dossier had been compiled with the assistance of Russian intelligence and paid for by Hillary Clinton ’ s campaign .
Actually , there is no question whatsoever that the Washington Post is the most dishonest and blatant purveyor of falsehoods .
This timeline , for example , compiled by Phillip Bump is a perfect example of a completely false narrative now disproved in the actual words of the Mueller report .
Bump ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the most dishonest , inaccurate , contrived , defamatory coverage of the ordeal I went through .
This timeline , for example at the Washington Post – “ A timeline of the Roger Stone-WikiLeaks question ” should be nominated for a fiction writing prize .
Bump is of course , the ‘ journalist ” who insisted in the pages of the worst newspaper in America that there was never any evidence that Bill Clinton ever sexually assaulted any woman .
I was also vilified for in innocuous Twitter direct message exchange with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Intelligence Chiefs insist is a Russian operative and responsible for the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton campaign emails on behalf of the Russians .
In fact the identity of Guccifer 2.0 and the claim that he is a Russian assets is based on a series of cyber fingerprints that no real Russian Spy who wanted to have his intrusions undetected would leave and the CIA ’ s extensive report on how to hack a server and make it look like it came from elsewhere in the Vault 7 disclosures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Roger Stone admits contact with Russian Intelligence ” the headlines falsely screamed .
Even if he was Vladimir Putin himself the fact that the entire exchange took place long after the Clinton documents had been obtained and published by Wikileaks -meaning my involvement in the alleged hack of those would be impossible and the exchange itself proves no collaboration or collusion- because I released SCREEN SHOTS of the entire exchange in 2017 .
The left never lets facts get in the way of a good smear .
So in other words @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exchange with the persona of Guccifer 2.0 on Twitter DM which I myself released publicly , was proof of collusion between the GRU and the Trump campaign is disproved by the context , timing and content of the exchange which took place after the release of DNC documents by Wikileaks Mueller himself revived this chestnut in the Washington Post Op-Ed written for him by little Andy Weissmann .
For two years leaked stories predicting that although I had no formal role in the President ’ s campaign I would be charged with “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foreign Contribution Ban ” “ Fraud and Related Activities in Connection with Computers ” “ Wire Fraud ” “ Aiding and Abetting a conspiracy ” “ Unauthorized Access of a Protected Computer ” “ Accessory After the Fact to the commission of a felony .
Indeed , Aaron Zelinsky the prosecutor on the Mueller team who previously worked as Deputy Counsel for Hillary Clinton at the State Department , would represent to multiple Federal Judges and magistrates that he had probable cause to investigate me on these ridiculous charges to obtain search warrants @ @ @ @ @ @ @ computers , my cell phone , my text messages , my paper files , my business records , my Florida home , my Florida studio and my New York City Apartment .
This is why they had to find something else , anything else , to charge me with .
The ‘ Lying to Congress ” charges are a tortured stretch .
The witness tampering charge is a bogus concoction .
The witness I alledgedly tampered with- Randy Credico- threatened to put a bullet in the head of one of my associates who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if he contradicted Credico ’ s ( false ) testimony .
No misstatement I made to the House Intelligence Committee hid any underlying crime , meaning I had no motive to lie .
The argument made by prosecutors at my trial , that I lied to hide the Trump campaigns interest in the Wikileaks disclosures because it would ” look bad ” for Donald Trump is ludicrous in view of the fact that candidate Trump himself discussed the wikileaks disclosures 142 times in September and October of 2016 according to MSNBC .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with an honest Judge who did not bar every powerful defense and had an honest unbiased jury , I might have been acquitted .
The report ’ s previously blacked-out pages reveal what is , in effect , a confession by Special Counsel operatives that they had absolutely nothing to substantiate any prosecutable offenses against myself , Wikileaks or the Trump campaign , despite their efforts to torture the law to its limits to obtain their desired outcomes .
Most astonishingly , after explaining they had no evidence to support criminal charges @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perfectly-legal efforts to raise awareness and promote public scrutiny of Democrat corruption , as chronicled in an authentic record of the Democrats ’ own communications , the report further confesses that their investigative targets like me had substantial 1st Amendment-based defenses , likely to overcome any attempted criminal prosecution .
In other words the Mueller gang now admits that my efforts to promote public awareness of the Wikileaks disclosures was perfectly legal .
Shove that up your ass , Natasha Bertand .
My constitutional rights to freedom of speech and press , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ activities attempting to inform the public about Clinton Democrat corruption ahead of a presidential election , were maliciously violated by cynical , criminally power-abusive Special Counsel thugs .
The same goes for the rights of the President and those in the Trump Campaign who likewise sought to legally bring public light to information highly-relevant to the 2016 presidential election .
It is clear from the recently-unredacted materials that the Special Counsel , by its own admission , was fully aware it had no probable cause , or even reasonable suspicion , that either @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had done anything illegal concerning the Clinton-DNC email corruption expose .
Moreover , they admit that our efforts were in fact constitutionally-protected political and journalistic activities .
The short of this is that the malicious prosecution visited on me as a parting shot by the failed Special Counsel , just as it finally ended its nearly two-year witch hunt , was nothing more than a sensationalist ass-covering distraction and a cynical ploy intended to superficially justify the Special Counsel ’ s pointless , prolonged existence , after spending almost two years to come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ substance or credibility to support the BIG LIE on which it was dishonestly founded and perpetuated .
When this ulterior-motivated , malicious prosecution against me entered the federal court system it was before a hostile partisan judge whom the Special Counsel had purposefully “ shopped ” into the case through one of the prosecution team ’ s many false , misleading representations made to the U.S. District Court throughout the case .
They knew quite well what they were doing when they fraudulently secured Amy Berman-Jackson as the trial judge in my case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be tried before Judge Jackson because it was ‘ related ” to the case of the 17 alleged Russian Intelligence officers who they claim hacked the DNC and gave the purloined data to Wikileaks , a contention of the Government which they relied totally on an analysis by Crowdstrike , a Clinton-friendly IT Security firm .
Except Crowdstrike now denies that conclusion .
In fact prosecutors promised Judge Jackson they would introduce evidence obtained by search warrant in that case at my trial .
They didn ’ t produce any such thing but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and lied to do it .
My attorneys were successful in getting the government to admit that the only “ evidence ” they had that Russian intelligence agents had computer hacked the Democratic National Committee was this redacted draft report from the Democratic aligned IT Firm Crowdstrike and that the FBI had never actually examined the DNC servers .
When this news hit the media like a bombshell , out-of-control left wing Judge Amy Berman Jackson tightened the unconstitutional gag order on me to prevent me from discussing the shocking revelation and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a former Deputy White House Counsel to President Barack Obama after clerking for left-wing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer and failed Supreme Court nominee and far-left D.C .
Circuit Judge Merrick Garland , filed a sur reply with the court falsely claiming that the US Government and the Mueller investigation had additional evidence to bolster their claim that the Russians hacked the DNC .
We now know based on the documents declassified to date that no such proof exists and that Kravis defrauded the court .
The secrecy of this entire process @ @ @ @ @ @ @ e-mails turned over to BuzzFeed News by the Executive Office of US Attorneys were heavily redacted .
The agency withheld 152 pages in releasing the emails Nov. 3rd and indicated some of those records are sealed and others were referred to the FBI for review .
These many redactions need to be explained or removed .
This isn ’ t some national security case .
There are no sensitive intelligence , diplomatic or military implications .
All parties involved are U.S. citizens .
There is no continuing investigation nor other pending cases involving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ domestic criminal prosecution of a sole defendant by jury trial in a federal district court for offenses implicating only legislative oversight of domestic political activities .
A prosecutor in the case made a public protest of withdrawing from the case over the government ’ s alleged handling of the sentencing .
He then volunteered public testimony to a legislative oversight committee alleging that the handling of the sentencing by his prosecution team was subject to undue influence by DOJ officials for ulterior political motives .
Yet according to the Washington Post three top @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the under oath testimony of Rougue prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky in which he claimed all three had told him of ‘ political pressure to ‘ go easy ” on Roger Stone .
When will Zelinsky be indicted for lying to Congress ?
Why is Zelinsky still working in the Trump Justice Department ?
Loose cannon Aaron Zelinsky isn ’ t the only one who lied under oath .
When Steve Bannon ’ s House Intelligence Committee testimony was declassified we learned that his testimony at my trial in which he was Mueller ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sworn testimony before the House Committee .
In fact George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley who reviewed both transcripts told the New York Post “ “ There does appear a glaring and irreconcilable conflict in what Bannon stated in testimony before Congress and the court .
What is striking is that this was not a peripheral point but one of the main areas of inquiry.
” Turley said .
“ He ( Bannon ) has two diametrically opposite sworn statements in a high-profile controversy with dozens of attorneys in attendance , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an obligation under the law to inform us that Steve Bannon was actively under investigation and knew this to be the case at the time that he offered false testimony against me .
The prosecutors in my case who were well aware of the discrepancies between Bannon ’ s house testimony and his testimony understand my trial knowingly suborned perjury .
Specifically , in the summer before trial , my defense team asked Berman-Jackson to order the DOJ to disgorge the Mueller report ’ s many redacted sections about me for our evaluation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if not as evidence of prosecutorial deceit and manipulation in violation of my constitutional rights as a criminal defendant .
Berman-Jackson ’ s response to this motion was to withhold her ruling and order the DOJ to turn over the unredacted report to her for her ‘ in camera ’ ( or behind closed doors ) evaluation of the contents before deciding whether to grant or deny our motion .
After receiving the unredacted report from the DOJ , per her order , and reviewing its contents out of view of the defense @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in it ) , Berman-Jackson summarily denied our motion , gave us numerous unredacted sections of the hidden material that was innocuous or meaningless without context but withheld the material that even Buzzfeed said ” vindicated “ me .
Berman-Jackson fully understood that evidence from the Special Counsel ’ s own report which unequivocally negated the entire premise of its pending prosecution against me — namely , a nefarious conspiracy to steal Democrat emails and collude with the Russians — would likely be devastating to the case against me for false statements to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Special Counsel knew to be legal , constitutionally-protected political and press activities .
Berman-Jackson knew what a death blow it would likely be to the Special Counsel ’ s inflated charges against me for purported false statements and witness tampering , if it came to light that this prosecution was entirely based on an effort to violate , suppress and punish my 1st Amendment protected political activities , and that the Special Counsel knew all along that this was what they were doing .
Many people incorrectly believe the President pardoned me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my sentence it is for these reasons that I am praying that President Trump will grant me a full pardon to end this Kafkaesque nightmare .

Guest post by Roger Stone
(In this exclusive report from Roger Stone, he explains his entire ordeal after being targeted by the Mueller gang and placed in front of Obama Judge Amy Berman Jackson. In this lengthy and detailed account of what he endured, Stone lays out his case and then asks that he be fully pardoned by President Trump.)
The Special Counsel’s Redacted Justice
Late in the night on election day 2020, just hours before the legal deadline imposed, the U.S. Department of Justice complied with a federal court decision ordering it to release the last remaining redacted sections of the so-called ‘Mueller Report’ that had been hidden since the report’s publication nearly 18 months earlier.
At midnight on election day November 3rd, 2020- the busiest news day of the year and timed to get as little press coverage as possible, the United States Department of Justice released the remaining unredacted sections of the Mueller Report regarding me specifically, in which they had admitted that despite two years of intense investigation, spending millions to pour through every aspect of my life, dragging 36 witnesses to the grand jury and after obtaining all my electronic communications for four years ( literally millions of e-mails and pages of documents, tax returns, banking and financial records –they found no factual evidence of any collaboration or coordination between me and WikiLeaks regarding the release of emails regarding John Podesta, the Democratic National committee or Hillary Clinton or that I had any advance knowledge of the timing, content or source of their disclosures).
Even BuzzFeed , who won the release of the data in a lawsuit actually said I was “vindicated”. The rest of the media? They reported nothing at all.
The report is a voluminous effort by the ‘Special’ Counsel’s unethical, if not criminally-corrupt, lawyers, as their prolonged, baseless, partisan-motivated legal fishing expedition finally came to an end, to blunt the logical conclusion by the public that the entire corrupt multi-year multi-million dollar boondoggle was in reality a malicious fraud against President Donald Trump and anyone who supported him and a runaway purveyor of kangaroo “justice” against its unfortunate political targets.
For it’s hundreds of pages tediously propping up a convoluted defamatory narrative now known to be nothing more than a brazen fabrication by the Democrat Party and Hillary Clinton’s failed presidential campaign, the report is rife with highly-parsed wording, deceitful innuendo, and presumptuous, conclusory leaps of illogic, often delving into irrelevant minutiae, engaging in misleading factual cherry-picking and employing officious-sounding spin as dishonest substitutes for evidence that never existed. Despite this sugar-coating what the unredacted documents do show is shocking.
Specifically the newly unveiled documents say:
On Page 178,
“The Office’s determination that it could not charge WikiLeaks or Stone as part of the Section 1030 conspiracy was also informed by the constitutional issues that such a prosecution would present. Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001), the First Amendment protects a party’s publication of illegally intercepted communications on a matter of public concern, even when the publishing parties knew or had reason to know of the intercepts’ unlawful origin.”
Also Page 178,
“The Office determined that it could not pursue a Section 1030 conspiracy charge against Stone for some of the same legal reasons. The most fundamental hurdles, though, are factual ones.1279 As explained in Volume I, Section III.D.1, supra, Corsi’s accounts of his interactions with Stone on October 7, 2016 are not fully consistent or corroborated. Even if they were, neither Corsi’s testimony nor other evidence currently available to the Office is sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Stone knew or believed that the computer intrusions were ongoing at the time he ostensibly encouraged or coordinated the publication of the Podesta emails. Stone’s actions would thus be consistent with (among other things) a belief that he was aiding in the dissemination of the fruits of an already completed hacking operation perpetrated by a third party, which would be a level of knowledge insufficient to establish conspiracy liability. See State v. Phillips, 82 S.E.2d 762, 766 (N.C. 1954) (“In the very nature of things, persons cannot retroactively conspire to commit a previously consummated crime.”) (quoted in Model Penal Code and Commentaries § 5.03, at 442 (1985).
“Regardless, success would also depend upon evidence of WikiLeaks’s and Stone’s knowledge of ongoing or contemplated future computer intrusions-the proof that is currently lacking.”
Judge Amy Berman withheld this from my lawyers at trial. The Mueller’s dirty cops concluded in their report that even if they had found evidence that I had received documents from Assange of WikiLeaks and passed them to anyone, which I did not and for which they found no evidence whatsoever, it would not have been illegal. The whole thing was a hoax.
For three years the fake News media has insisted that Julian Assange ( a journalist who has never had the accuracy of anything he has published questioned) is actually an asset for the Russians and that his website Wikileaks got the documents and e-mails via a hack via the Russians.
Worse they insisted that I had served as the link between Assange and WikiLeaks and the Trump campaign. I was called a traitor and a Russian spy. The left insisted that my colorful Twitter feed and some of my speeches and interviews proved that I had advance knowledge of the source and content of the WikiLeaks disclosures that so roiled the 2016 campaign. I was falsely accused of having advance knowledge of the publication of John Podesta’s e-mails.
The only three news outlets who reported on this shocking election day admission that there was no evidence found that would support this narrative were BuzzFeed, who successfully brought the lawsuit for the release of this material, the Washington Examiner and ZeroHedge. Where were the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, the Huffington Post, The Atlantic, The Hill, Politico, Salon, Vox, Vice, CNN, MSNBC, NBC and the Business Insider – all of who were quick to smear me as a “go-between for WikiLeaks and the Trump Campaign” but none of whom reported on the stunning conclusions of Mueller’s thugs.
It is important to note that the only communication I had with Wikileaks was via Twitter direct message and was fully disclosed and supplied to the House Intelligence Committee at the time of my testimony in 2017. Even this exchange proves nothing- yet Mueller’s thugs tried to pretend it was some kind of bombshell.
The media lynch mob that smeared me is a typical example of the bias and the fraudulence of the corporately-owned fake news media. The headlines below reflect just a small sample of the inaccurate and malicious reporting by the fake news media. Everyone of these stories is disproven by the November 3rd disclosure by the US Department of Justice. Every one of these stories includes fundamental falsehoods, Inaccurate leaks from the Special Counsel’s office, the omission of important facts, and the relentless pushing of an entire false narrative.
NY TIMES – Indicting Roger Stone, Mueller Shows Link Between Trump Campaign and Wikileaks
NY TIMES – Roger Stone Sold Himself to Trump’s Campaign as a WikiLeaks Pipeline. Was He?
NY TIMES – Roger Stone Was in Contact With Julian Assange in 2017, documents show
NY TIMES – Stone Trial Links Trump More Closely to 2016 Effort to Obtain Stolen Emails
CNN – Mueller indicts Roger Stone, says he was coordinating with Trump officials about WikiLeaks’ stolen emails
CNN – Special counsel prosecutors say they have communications of Stone with WikiLeaks
Reuters – Mueller says searches yielded evidence of Stone-WikiLeaks communications
The Hill – FBI releases documents showing Roger Stone, Julian Assange communications
The Atlantic – Roger Stone’s Secret Messages with WikiLeaks
The Guardian – I saw Roger Stone as ‘access point’ to WikiLeaks in 2016, Bannon tells court
POLITICO – Steve Bannon: Roger Stone was our unused WikiLeaks ‘access point’
Huffington Post – FBI Documents Reveal Communication Between Roger Stone, Julian Assange
Huffington Post – How WikiLeaks, Paul Manafort And Roger Stone Fit Into The Mueller Investigation
Huffington Post – Roger Stone Pressed For Damaging Emails About Hillary Clinton From WikiLeaks: Report
Business Insider & AP – FBI documents reveal that Roger Stone was in direct communication with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange
Business Insider – Mueller is looking into a stunning claim former Trump associate Roger Stone made about a meeting with Julian Assange
Business Insider – Roger Stone communicated with WikiLeaks about hacked Democratic emails, says Mueller investigation
New York Intelligencer – Mueller Investigating Whether Roger Stone Had Dinner With Assange
New York Intelligencer – Trump Floats Pardon of Russia-Scandal Accomplice Roger Stone
New York Intelligencer – Roger Stone Sought Clinton Emails From Assange in September 2016
New York Intelligencer – Roger Stone Knew in Advance About About the Stolen Emails. Did He Tell Trump?
Washington Post – The Roger Stone indictment fills in new details about WikiLeaks and the Trump campaign
VICE – Why Roger Stone could be Mueller’s next target in the Russia probe
VICE – Roger Stone says he doesn’t “think” he discussed WikiLeaks with Paul Manafort
VICE – Trump surrogate Roger Stone claims ‘devastating’ WikiLeaks bombshells to come
MSNBC – Roger Stone Tried to Walk Back Claims About Julian Assange
MSNBC – Stone trial testimony sheds new light on Trump, WikiLeaks connections
MSNBC – Roger Stone faces new questions about alleged WikiLeaks connections
MSNBC – Roger Stone link to WikiLeaks and Julian Assange Uncovered
NBC – Text messages show Roger Stone and friend discussing WikiLeaks plans
Salon-Roger Stone admits to 2016 phone conversation with Julian Assange: Report
Sharon LaFrontiere of the New York Times, Roz Helderman of the Washington Post, Shelby Holliday of the Wall Street Journal, the odious Natasha Bertrand, then of Atlantic Magazine, now at Politico, the vile Jonathan Chiat of New York Magazine, Daniel Friedman at Mother Jones, Andrew Prokop of Vox, Sara Murray of CNN, congenital liar Ari Melber of MSNBC, NBC propaghadist and long -time CIA plant Ken Dilanian, ( who was actually fired by the Chicago Tribune for clearing his stories with the Agency)-are just a handful of the “reporters” who defamed me repeatedly with a torrent of lies and distortions, none of whom had the couresy or professionalism to report the Nov 3 disclosures which prove that virtually all of their reporting on my case and the Mueller witch hunt efforts to destroy me, were flawed, distorted and based on the fundamental principles of honest journalism should now be retracted or corrected. I won’t hold my breath.
It wasn’t just the nut jobs like Mother Jones ,the Daily Beast , Salon and nutty bloggers like Marcy Wheeler but allegedly responsible media outlets like the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal and CNN and MSNBC became obsessed with the idea that I was working with WikiLeaks and WikiLeaks was working with the Russians.
I often joke with some of my associates as to what newspaper in the United States is the worst when it comes to trafficking in the main stream media narrative in which they told us that the Trump campaign had colluded with Russian intelligence in the 2020 elections and repeatedly asserted the questionable claim by US Intelligence that Julian Assange was a Russian asset and that the Democratic National Committee’s servers were hacked by the Russians.
Not surprisingly, none of these reporters or outlets reported on the declassified documents ultimately liberated from the national security bureaucrats by acted DNI Director, Rick Grenell which prove that now not even Crowdstrike stands behind the claim that there is forensic proof that the Russians hacked the DNC. The intelligence services and the FBI knew from the beginning that the Steele dossier had been compiled with the assistance of Russian intelligence and paid for by Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
Actually, there is no question whatsoever that the Washington Post is the most dishonest and blatant purveyor of falsehoods. This timeline, for example, compiled by Phillip Bump is a perfect example of a completely false narrative now disproved in the actual words of the Mueller report. Bump’s reporting at the Washington Post stands out as the most dishonest, inaccurate, contrived ,defamatory coverage of the ordeal I went through. This timeline , for example at the Washington Post – “A timeline of the Roger Stone-WikiLeaks question” should be nominated for a fiction writing prize.
Bump is of course, the ‘journalist” who insisted in the pages of the worst newspaper in America that there was never any evidence that Bill Clinton ever sexually assaulted any woman.
I was also vilified for in innocuous Twitter direct message exchange with the persona of Guccifer 2.0 who our Intelligence Chiefs insist is a Russian operative and responsible for the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton campaign emails on behalf of the Russians. In fact the identity of Guccifer 2.0 and the claim that he is a Russian assets is based on a series of cyber fingerprints that no real Russian Spy who wanted to have his intrusions undetected would leave and the CIA’s extensive report on how to hack a server and make it look like it came from elsewhere in the Vault 7 disclosures of CIA dirty laundry published by Wikileaks.
“Roger Stone admits contact with Russian Intelligence” the headlines falsely screamed. Even if he was Vladimir Putin himself the fact that the entire exchange took place long after the Clinton documents had been obtained and published by Wikileaks -meaning my involvement in the alleged hack of those would be impossible and the exchange itself proves no collaboration or collusion- because I released SCREEN SHOTS of the entire exchange in 2017.
The left never lets facts get in the way of a good smear.
So in other words the claim that my innocent and innocuous exchange with the persona of Guccifer 2.0 on Twitter DM which I myself released publicly, was proof of collusion between the GRU and the Trump campaign is disproved by the context, timing and content of the exchange which took place after the release of DNC documents by Wikileaks Mueller himself revived this chestnut in the Washington Post Op-Ed written for him by little Andy Weissmann.
For two years leaked stories predicting that although I had no formal role in the President’s campaign I would be charged with “Conspiracy Against the United States” “Foreign Contribution Ban” “Fraud and Related Activities in Connection with Computers” “Wire Fraud” “Aiding and Abetting a conspiracy” “Unauthorized Access of a Protected Computer” “Accessory After the Fact to the commission of a felony. Indeed, Aaron Zelinsky the prosecutor on the Mueller team who previously worked as Deputy Counsel for Hillary Clinton at the State Department, would represent to multiple Federal Judges and magistrates that he had probable cause to investigate me on these ridiculous charges to obtain search warrants to access (and trash) my computers, my cell phone, my text messages, my paper files, my business records, my Florida home, my Florida studio and my New York City Apartment.
This is why they had to find something else, anything else, to charge me with. The ‘Lying to Congress” charges are a tortured stretch. The witness tampering charge is a bogus concoction. The witness I alledgedly tampered with- Randy Credico- threatened to put a bullet in the head of one of my associates who was subpoenaed to the grand jury, if he contradicted Credico’s ( false) testimony.
No misstatement I made to the House Intelligence Committee hid any underlying crime, meaning I had no motive to lie. The argument made by prosecutors at my trial, that I lied to hide the Trump campaigns interest in the Wikileaks disclosures because it would ” look bad” for Donald Trump is ludicrous in view of the fact that candidate Trump himself discussed the wikileaks disclosures 142 times in September and October of 2016 according to MSNBC. If I had been given a fair trial, with an honest Judge who did not bar every powerful defense and had an honest unbiased jury, I might have been acquitted.
The report’s previously blacked-out pages reveal what is, in effect, a confession by Special Counsel operatives that they had absolutely nothing to substantiate any prosecutable offenses against myself, Wikileaks or the Trump campaign, despite their efforts to torture the law to its limits to obtain their desired outcomes.
Most astonishingly, after explaining they had no evidence to support criminal charges for what they knew full well were perfectly-legal efforts to raise awareness and promote public scrutiny of Democrat corruption, as chronicled in an authentic record of the Democrats’ own communications, the report further confesses that their investigative targets like me had substantial 1st Amendment-based defenses, likely to overcome any attempted criminal prosecution. In other words the Mueller gang now admits that my efforts to promote public awareness of the Wikileaks disclosures was perfectly legal. Shove that up your ass, Natasha Bertand.
My constitutional rights to freedom of speech and press, as exercised in totally-legal political and election campaign activities attempting to inform the public about Clinton Democrat corruption ahead of a presidential election, were maliciously violated by cynical, criminally power-abusive Special Counsel thugs.
The same goes for the rights of the President and those in the Trump Campaign who likewise sought to legally bring public light to information highly-relevant to the 2016 presidential election.
It is clear from the recently-unredacted materials that the Special Counsel, by its own admission, was fully aware it had no probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion, that either WikiLeaks, the Trump Campaign or I had done anything illegal concerning the Clinton-DNC email corruption expose. Moreover, they admit that our efforts were in fact constitutionally-protected political and journalistic activities.
The short of this is that the malicious prosecution visited on me as a parting shot by the failed Special Counsel, just as it finally ended its nearly two-year witch hunt, was nothing more than a sensationalist ass-covering distraction and a cynical ploy intended to superficially justify the Special Counsel’s pointless, prolonged existence, after spending almost two years to come up with literally nothing whatsoever of any substance or credibility to support the BIG LIE on which it was dishonestly founded and perpetuated.
When this ulterior-motivated, malicious prosecution against me entered the federal court system it was before a hostile partisan judge whom the Special Counsel had purposefully “shopped” into the case through one of the prosecution team’s many false, misleading representations made to the U.S. District Court throughout the case. They knew quite well what they were doing when they fraudulently secured Amy Berman-Jackson as the trial judge in my case.
Prosecutors insisted that my case must be tried before Judge Jackson because it was ‘related” to the case of the 17 alleged Russian Intelligence officers who they claim hacked the DNC and gave the purloined data to Wikileaks, a contention of the Government which they relied totally on an analysis by Crowdstrike, a Clinton-friendly IT Security firm. Except Crowdstrike now denies that conclusion. In fact prosecutors promised Judge Jackson they would introduce evidence obtained by search warrant in that case at my trial. They didn’t produce any such thing but they got the Trump-hating Judge they wanted- and lied to do it.
My attorneys were successful in getting the government to admit that the only “evidence” they had that Russian intelligence agents had computer hacked the Democratic National Committee was this redacted draft report from the Democratic aligned IT Firm Crowdstrike and that the FBI had never actually examined the DNC servers.
When this news hit the media like a bombshell, out-of-control left wing Judge Amy Berman Jackson tightened the unconstitutional gag order on me to prevent me from discussing the shocking revelation and the prosecutor in my case Jonathan Kravis , a former Deputy White House Counsel to President Barack Obama after clerking for left-wing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer and failed Supreme Court nominee and far-left D.C. Circuit Judge Merrick Garland, filed a sur reply with the court falsely claiming that the US Government and the Mueller investigation had additional evidence to bolster their claim that the Russians hacked the DNC. We now know based on the documents declassified to date that no such proof exists and that Kravis defrauded the court.
The secrecy of this entire process is obsessive. The 76 pages of e-mails turned over to BuzzFeed News by the Executive Office of US Attorneys were heavily redacted. The agency withheld 152 pages in releasing the emails Nov. 3rd and indicated some of those records are sealed and others were referred to the FBI for review. These many redactions need to be explained or removed. This isn’t some national security case. There are no sensitive intelligence, diplomatic or military implications. All parties involved are U.S. citizens. There is no continuing investigation nor other pending cases involving its subject matter.
This is a domestic criminal prosecution of a sole defendant by jury trial in a federal district court for offenses implicating only legislative oversight of domestic political activities. A prosecutor in the case made a public protest of withdrawing from the case over the government’s alleged handling of the sentencing. He then volunteered public testimony to a legislative oversight committee alleging that the handling of the sentencing by his prosecution team was subject to undue influence by DOJ officials for ulterior political motives. Yet according to the Washington Post three top senior non-political Officers at DOJ have denied the under oath testimony of Rougue prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky in which he claimed all three had told him of ‘political pressure to ‘go easy” on Roger Stone. When will Zelinsky be indicted for lying to Congress? Why is Zelinsky still working in the Trump Justice Department?
Loose cannon Aaron Zelinsky isn’t the only one who lied under oath. When Steve Bannon’s House Intelligence Committee testimony was declassified we learned that his testimony at my trial in which he was Mueller’s star witness was directly contradicted by his sworn testimony before the House Committee. In fact George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley who reviewed both transcripts told the New York Post ““There does appear a glaring and irreconcilable conflict in what Bannon stated in testimony before Congress and the court. What is striking is that this was not a peripheral point but one of the main areas of inquiry.” Turley said. “He (Bannon) has two diametrically opposite sworn statements in a high-profile controversy with dozens of attorneys in attendance,” Turley noted.
Additionally federal prosecutors had an obligation under the law to inform us that Steve Bannon was actively under investigation and knew this to be the case at the time that he offered false testimony against me. The prosecutors in my case who were well aware of the discrepancies between Bannon’s house testimony and his testimony understand my trial knowingly suborned perjury.
Specifically, in the summer before trial, my defense team asked Berman-Jackson to order the DOJ to disgorge the Mueller report’s many redacted sections about me for our evaluation and possible use as exculpatory evidence, if not as evidence of prosecutorial deceit and manipulation in violation of my constitutional rights as a criminal defendant.
Berman-Jackson’s response to this motion was to withhold her ruling and order the DOJ to turn over the unredacted report to her for her ‘in camera’ (or behind closed doors) evaluation of the contents before deciding whether to grant or deny our motion. After receiving the unredacted report from the DOJ, per her order, and reviewing its contents out of view of the defense (the prosecution already knew what was in it), Berman-Jackson summarily denied our motion, gave us numerous unredacted sections of the hidden material that was innocuous or meaningless without context but withheld the material that even Buzzfeed said ” vindicated “me.
Berman-Jackson fully understood that evidence from the Special Counsel’s own report which unequivocally negated the entire premise of its pending prosecution against me — namely, a nefarious conspiracy to steal Democrat emails and collude with the Russians — would likely be devastating to the case against me for false statements to a partisan committee supposedly investigating what they and Special Counsel knew to be legal, constitutionally-protected political and press activities.
Berman-Jackson knew what a death blow it would likely be to the Special Counsel’s inflated charges against me for purported false statements and witness tampering, if it came to light that this prosecution was entirely based on an effort to violate, suppress and punish my 1st Amendment protected political activities, and that the Special Counsel knew all along that this was what they were doing.
Many people incorrectly believe the President pardoned me back in July when he actually commuted my sentence it is for these reasons that I am praying that President Trump will grant me a full pardon to end this Kafkaesque nightmare.


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-23--Fox News Failing — Newsmax: “We’ll Probably Overtake Them In The Next Six Months”

One America News and Newsmax have filled the gap .
Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy predicts they will soon overtake Fox News in total audience .
TRENDING : JUST IN : President Trump Announces 26 New Christmas Pardons Including Paul Manafort and Roger Stone Newsmax TV CEO Christopher Ruddy has a bold prediction about his rivalry with Fox News : “ We ’ ll probably overtake them in the next six months in total audience , ” he told Newsweek .
Newsmax TV has , indeed , surged in ratings… In the wake of the election , loyal viewers of Fox @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than they were getting at Fox , with the exception of primetime , where Sean Hannity , Laura Ingraham and Tucker Carlson are still largely in the president ’ s corner .
The Gateway Pundit has previously reported on Fox ’ s ratings drop : • Neil Cavuto drew 2.192 million viewers in August .
By November he was attracting only 1.3 million .
• The Five also suffered a big loss , going from 3.772 million in August to 2.883 million in November–minus 889,000 viewers .
• Bret Baier suffered a significant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 2.117 million in November .
• Martha MacCallum fared worse—she shed 50 % of her audience , collapsing from 3.201 million to 1.613 million .
• Tucker Carlson also has taken a big hit–dropping from 5.719 million in August to 3.444 million in November .
That is a drop of 2.275 million .
• Sean Hannity ’ s shining star is flaming out .
His viewership plummeted from 6.838 million to 2.839 million .
That means almost 4 million people fled his show .
• And Laura Ingraham bled out–she dropped from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2.706 viewers .

Fox News betrayed conservatives and continues a downward spiral.
One America News and Newsmax have filled the gap.
Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy predicts they will soon overtake Fox News in total audience.
Newsweek: Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy has a bold prediction about his rivalry with Fox News https://t.co/HWLgt4jv9T pic.twitter.com/6BhhoDp5Mo — Newsmax (@newsmax) December 23, 2020
Newsweek reported:
Newsmax TV CEO Christopher Ruddy has a bold prediction about his rivalry with Fox News: “We’ll probably overtake them in the next six months in total audience,” he told Newsweek.
Newsmax TV has, indeed, surged in ratings… In the wake of the election, loyal viewers of Fox News searched for more pro-Donald Trump coverage than they were getting at Fox, with the exception of primetime, where Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Tucker Carlson are still largely in the president’s corner.
The Gateway Pundit has previously reported on Fox’s ratings drop:
(From November 30th)


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-23--Liberal Democrats Support Trump’s Plan To Increase Payments To $2,000

Democrats ’ bill has billions of wasteful spending — it only gave Americans $ 600 .
In his speech , @ @ @ @ @ for hard-working Americans .
TRENDING : JUST IN : President Trump Announces 26 New Christmas @ @ @ @ @ Roger Stone President Trump gave an address Tuesday evening from the White House on the @ @ @ @ @ he called on Congress to redo the $ 900 billion , 5593 pages long bill @ @ @ @ @ of negotiations by providing payments to Americans of $ 2000 per adult or $ 4000 @ @ @ @ @ passed by the House and Senate contains payments of only $ 600 per adult American @ @ @ @ @ 1800 for the families of illegal aliens married to American citizens .
The address was @ @ @ @ @ this : Liberal Democrats have come out in support of increasing payments to $ 2,000 @ @ @ @ @ the economy , and people need help .
Is it Mitch or Pelosi standing in @ @ @

President Trump will veto Democrats’ COVID relief bill.
Democrats’ bill has billions of wasteful spending — it only gave Americans $600.
In his speech, President Trump demanded $2,000 for hard-working Americans.
JUST IN: President @realDonaldTrump says the coronavirus relief bill is a “DISGRACE” with a lot of wasteful spending, calls for direct payments to be increased from $600 to $2000.#VETO pic.twitter.com/0YDHUHtWBF — WW News 🚨 (@WW_NEWS_) December 23, 2020
The Gateway Pundit previously reported:
President Trump gave an address Tuesday evening from the White House on the COVID relief bill in which he called on Congress to redo the $900 billion, 5593 pages long bill passed Monday night after months of negotiations by providing payments to Americans of $2000 per adult or $4000 per couple. The bill passed by the House and Senate contains payments of only $600 per adult American but giving up to $1800 for the families of illegal aliens married to American citizens. The address was posted to Twitter.
Now this: Liberal Democrats have come out in support of increasing payments to $2,000.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez:
Let’s do it. @RashidaTlaib and I already co-wrote the COVID amendment for $2,000 checks, so it’s ready to go. Glad to see the President is willing to support our legislation. We can pass $2k checks this week if the Senate GOP agrees to stand down. https://t.co/GprwrUPali pic.twitter.com/nFFs1ExqCK — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) December 23, 2020
Bernie Sanders:
That’s great! I first introduced a bill to provide a $2,000 direct payment with @SenKamalaHarris & @EdMarkey 7 months ago. Now, Mr. President, get Mitch McConnell and your Republican friends to stop opposing it and we can provide working class Americans with $2,000. Let’s do it. https://t.co/fKvqBsqM0k — Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) December 23, 2020
Rashida Tlaib:
Me and @AOC have the amendment ready. Send the bill back, and we will put in the $2,000 we’ve been fighting for that your party has been blocking. pic.twitter.com/GGXtJt77D9 — Rashida Tlaib (@RashidaTlaib) December 23, 2020
Ayanna Pressley:
The Occupant of the White House taking a hard line in support of what Progressives have been fighting for, literally all year, to spite McConnell. Honestly, whatever gets my constituents survival checks. People’s lives are at stake. Survival checks now. pic.twitter.com/FsADptgffS — Ayanna Pressley (@AyannaPressley) December 23, 2020
Ilhan Omar:
Mitch don’t be the only reason people don’t get $2000, let’s do this. https://t.co/yuvsYUQX6m — Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) December 23, 2020
The government shut down the economy, and people need help.
Is it Mitch or Pelosi standing in the way?


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-23--LIVE STREAM VIDEO: Georgia House Of Representatives Holds Hearing On Election Fraud

The Georgia House Of Representatives is holding a hearing on election fraud in the 2020 election .
The committee likely is going to consider whether or not Georgia ’ s presidential election results should be decertified .
Here is the live RSBN feed : The Election Wizard is live-tweeting the hearing here .
The Gateway Pundit previously reported on a report released by Georgia State Senator William T. Ligon which said the results of the 2020 election in Georgia were “ untrustworthy ” : TRENDING : JUST IN : President Trump Announces 26 New Christmas Pardons Including Paul Manafort and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposing the massive fraud that took place in Georgia during the 2020 election .
Georgia State Senator William T. Ligon chairs a subcommittee of the State Judiciary committee that heard witness testimony on the fraud in Georgia .
In Ligon ’ s summary of the hearings , he said , “ The November 3 , 2020 General Election ( the “ Election ” ) was chaotic and any reported results must be viewed as untrustworthy.
“ Ligon released a report outlining the reasons to question the results coming out of Georgia .
Here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the report : -The Secretary of State and the State Elections Board failed to enforce the law as written in the Georgia Code .
They created policies that contravened Georgia State law .
-The Secretary of State failed to have a transparent process for the verification of signatures for absentee ballots .
This wasn ’ t only on election day but also during the subsequent recount and audit .
-The Secretary of State instituted an unconstitutional gag order which blocked poll monitors from using photography or video recording devices during the recount .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of custody for these ballots , both prior to and after voting and throughout the recount .
-Hostile behavior of workers toward citizen volunteer monitors during the recount process was not stopped by election officials .
-Oral and written testimony “ provided ample evidence ” that the 2020 Georgia General Election was compromised .

The Georgia House Of Representatives is holding a hearing on election fraud in the 2020 election.
The committee likely is going to consider whether or not Georgia’s presidential election results should be decertified.
Here is the live RSBN feed:
The Election Wizard is live-tweeting the hearing here.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported on a report released by Georgia State Senator William T. Ligon which said the results of the 2020 election in Georgia were “untrustworthy”:
A Georgia State Senator is exposing the massive fraud that took place in Georgia during the 2020 election.
Georgia State Senator William T. Ligon chairs a subcommittee of the State Judiciary committee that heard witness testimony on the fraud in Georgia.
In Ligon’s summary of the hearings, he said, “The November 3, 2020 General Election (the “Election”) was chaotic and any reported results must be viewed as untrustworthy.“
Ligon released a report outlining the reasons to question the results coming out of Georgia.
Here is a summary of the findings in the report:


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-23--Has the FBI Spoken with Ruby Freeman or Ralph Jones Yet? And If Not, Why in the Hell Do we Have an F

Has the FBI Spoken with Ruby Freeman or Ralph Jones Yet? And If Not, Why in the Hell Do we Have an FBI?

On Tuesday night President Trump tweeted out an OANN report on a Gateway Pundit investigation of the Atlanta suitcase voter fraud scandal .
The Gateway Pundit was first to identify Ruby Freeman , her daughter Wandrea “ Shaye ” Moss , and their boss Ralph Jones , Sr. in the infamous suitcase ballot hoist .
We later reported on Ruby Freeman running the same batch of ballots through the counting machines at least three times after these Democrat operatives cleared the room of observers !
On Tuesday night President Trump tweeted this OANN and Gateway Pundit video .
TRENDING : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New Christmas Pardons Including Paul Manafort and Roger Stone Shaye Moss is the same person who called out for observers to go home late on election night before the ballot hoist .
Ralph Jones , Sr. is ON AUDIO telling reporters he was going to shut down the State Farm Center early and send observers home .
This was BEFORE the suitcase ballot hoist !
It was a carefully planned event !
They had NO IDEA they would get caught !
At this time there is no evidence that FBI or the Georgia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ruby Freeman , Shaye Ross , or Ralph Jones , Sr .
They were able to flip Georgia for Beijing Biden by their actions .
Why is the FBI or DOJ not involved ?
This tells you everything you need to know about your federal government .

On Tuesday night President Trump tweeted out an OANN report on a Gateway Pundit investigation of the Atlanta suitcase voter fraud scandal.
The Gateway Pundit was first to identify Ruby Freeman, her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, and their boss Ralph Jones, Sr. in the infamous suitcase ballot hoist.
We later reported on Ruby Freeman running the same batch of ballots through the counting machines at least three times after these Democrat operatives cleared the room of observers!
On Tuesday night President Trump tweeted this OANN and Gateway Pundit video.
Shaye Moss is the same person who called out for observers to go home late on election night before the ballot hoist.
Ralph Jones, Sr. is ON AUDIO telling reporters he was going to shut down the State Farm Center early and send observers home. This was BEFORE the suitcase ballot hoist!
It was a carefully planned event!
They had NO IDEA they would get caught!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/now-audio-georgia-election-official-ralph-jones-sr-announced-nov-3rd-evening-counting-stop-11-pm-led-team-count-stashed-suitcase-ballots/
At this time there is no evidence that FBI or the Georgia Bureau of Investigations have interviewed or arrested Ruby Freeman, Shaye Ross, or Ralph Jones, Sr.
They were able to flip Georgia for Beijing Biden by their actions.
Why is the FBI or DOJ not involved?
This tells you everything you need to know about your federal government.


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-23--Anti-Trump Georgia Election Official Catches Woman Trying To Vote Illegally Using His Home Address

Georgia Elections official Gabriel Sterling has attacked Trump and Republicans for claiming the November Georgia election was fraudulent .
Now @ @ @ @ @ official challenge stating that a woman has tried to vote illegally from his home address @ @ @ @ @ : President Trump Announces 26 New Christmas Pardons Including Paul Manafort and Roger Stone Sterling @ @ @ @ @ Fissha requested and returned an absentee ballot in the November general election .
But , @ @ @ @ @ in the house listed on her voting records .
Gabriel Sterling ’ s house .
@ @ @ @ @ him attacking Trump and the GOP from December 1st : Sterling also had a history @ @ @ @ @ : The Gateway Pundit previously reported on this : In February 2016 Sterling tweeted out @ @ @ @ @ !
And in April 2016 Gabriel Sterling admitted he was # NeverTrump If it happened @ @ @ @ @ how many other times has it happened ?
Will Gabriel Sterling admit that the November @ @ @ @ @ with fraud ?

Georgia Elections official Gabriel Sterling has attacked Trump and Republicans for claiming the November Georgia election was fraudulent.
Now this: Sterling filed an official challenge stating that a woman has tried to vote illegally from his home address.
The woman I bought my home from over 2 yrs ago trying to vote from it absentee 1/5. I’ve filed official challenge to stop her from casting an apparently illegal vote. https://t.co/V8KzuWBuYL #gapol — Gabriel Sterling (@GabrielSterling) December 22, 2020
The Fulton Elections Board has acted and stated that my challenge to the qualifications of the woman attempting to vote from the house I purchased from her 2 years ago meets probable cause. — Gabriel Sterling (@GabrielSterling) December 22, 2020
Fox5 Atlanta reported:
Sterling says voting records show Meron Fissha requested and returned an absentee ballot in the November general election. But, she wasn’t living in the house listed on her voting records. Gabriel Sterling’s house.
Here is a clip of him attacking Trump and the GOP from December 1st:
Sterling also had a history of anti-Trump social media posts:
The Gateway Pundit previously reported on this:
In February 2016 Sterling tweeted out that Trump must be stopped!
And in April 2016 Gabriel Sterling admitted he was #NeverTrump
If it happened to an elections official, how many other times has it happened?
Will Gabriel Sterling admit that the November election in Georgia was rife with fraud?


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-23--President Trump Tweets Gateway Pundit Video Showing Poll Workers Stuffing Ballots Into Tabulators Nu

President Trump Tweets Gateway Pundit Video Showing Poll Workers Stuffing Ballots Into Tabulators Numerous Times on Election Night

President Trump tweeted a Gateway Pundit video where we identified Georgia ballot workers jamming ballots into tabulators multiple times late @ @ @ @ @ Trump just now retweeted our video where we show Georgia poll workers jamming multiple ballots @ @ @ @ @ The video aired on OAN : TRENDING : JUST IN : President Trump Announces 26 @ @ @ @ @ Manafort and Roger Stone We shared this video on December 4 , when we pointed @ @ @ @ @ participants in the ballots under the desk scandal grabbed the ballots and started jamming the @ @ @ @ @ three times .
The Democrats using people like these poll workers stole the election for @ @ @ @ @ thousands of ballots in Georgia are fraudulent .

President Trump tweeted a Gateway Pundit video where we identified Georgia ballot workers jamming ballots into tabulators multiple times late on election night.
President Trump just now retweeted our video where we show Georgia poll workers jamming multiple ballots through tabulators multiple times. The video aired on OAN:
We shared this video on December 4, when we pointed out that one of the participants in the ballots under the desk scandal grabbed the ballots and started jamming the ballots into the Dominion tabulators three times.
Georgia’s results are a total fraud.
The Democrats using people like these poll workers stole the election for Joe Biden.
Tens of thousands of ballots in Georgia are fraudulent.


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-24--Democrats, Several Republicans, China and Other Foreign Entities Are Planning to Run Out the Clock t

Democrats, Several Republicans, China and Other Foreign Entities Are Planning to Run Out the Clock to Steal the Election – We Won’t Let Them

Of course , the President ’ s opponent was very weak .
This is why it is totally ridiculous unreasonable nonsense to even suggest that senile and basement dwelling Joe Biden overcame this record and won the 2020 election .
This was a steal .
It was the biggest criminal steal in world history and it must not be allowed .
Watkins Xerxes put together a piece at Medium ( which they will no doubt soon take down ) that makes some excellent points : TRENDING : JUST IN : President Trump Announces 26 New Christmas Pardons Including Paul Manafort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them or not the CCP has well skilled , polished and professional lawyers .
These attorneys obviously set up and planned these procedures , likely months in advance .
With the goal of overthrowing our elected form of government with a game of procedure .
Each step of the way , as they approach the next Boss in this game , the goal has been to run out the clock .
Denying the President and his team from having any time with the ball .
It is a bold position , but has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ successfully .
With a big enough offensive team , the defense can be neglected , or even ignored .
Since the offense has total control of the ball .
This game played to conclusion will leave the offense in a position of permanent offensiveness .
Which will result in a win for team .
Rules can even be ignored , because in this game the winning team writes the rules .
Surely new rules will be instituted .
That will nullify any fouls that were dealt the opposing team during the game .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ all forever in this game .
However , they forgot something .
They made some strategic errors in their game plan .
The biggest one being .
This is not a game .
It is an election .
The election to determine the path of the greatest nation on earth .
By continuing to treat it as a game .
The defense allows the offense to simply run out the clock .
Even though the defense is strong .
The defense has all the current law and resources of the nation on its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ game the defense just allows the clock to run out in the offenses imaginary game .
The playing field the offense set up is completely rigged to their advantage .
The referees have been paid to look the other way , and allow the clock to continue to run .
The offense has been caught with to many players on the field , yet the referees look the other way .
Even when the instant replay is clearly in favor of the defense .
The referees are to busy counting their money to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ run down .
There will be pardons waiting at the end of the game for those that committed publicly visible crimes during the election .
With the only requirement being that Joe Biden wins and is inaugurated in January 2021 .

Of course, the President’s opponent was very weak. This is why it is totally ridiculous unreasonable nonsense to even suggest that senile and basement dwelling Joe Biden overcame this record and won the 2020 election. This was a steal. It was the biggest criminal steal in world history and it must not be allowed.
Watkins Xerxes put together a piece at Medium (which they will no doubt soon take down) that makes some excellent points:
Whether you agree with them or not the CCP has well skilled, polished and professional lawyers. These attorneys obviously set up and planned these procedures, likely months in advance. With the goal of overthrowing our elected form of government with a game of procedure. Each step of the way, as they approach the next Boss in this game, the goal has been to run out the clock. Denying the President and his team from having any time with the ball. It is a bold position, but has been played before by many football coaches successfully. With a big enough offensive team, the defense can be neglected, or even ignored. Since the offense has total control of the ball. This game played to conclusion will leave the offense in a position of permanent offensiveness. Which will result in a win for team. Rules can even be ignored, because in this game the winning team writes the rules. Surely new rules will be instituted. That will nullify any fouls that were dealt the opposing team during the game. Why not, since the winner takes all forever in this game.
However, they forgot something. They made some strategic errors in their game plan. The biggest one being. This is not a game. It is an election. The election to determine the path of the greatest nation on earth. By continuing to treat it as a game. The defense allows the offense to simply run out the clock. Even though the defense is strong. The defense has all the current law and resources of the nation on its side. Yet, by playing the game the defense just allows the clock to run out in the offenses imaginary game.
The playing field the offense set up is completely rigged to their advantage. The referees have been paid to look the other way, and allow the clock to continue to run. The offense has been caught with to many players on the field, yet the referees look the other way. Even when the instant replay is clearly in favor of the defense. The referees are to busy counting their money to notice, and the clock continues to run down.
There will be pardons waiting at the end of the game for those that committed publicly visible crimes during the election. With the only requirement being that Joe Biden wins and is inaugurated in January 2021.


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-24--House Majority Caught On Call Urging House Reps to Kill Trump’s $2000 Check Demand

First no response from the Republicans on the most obvious and corrupt election in world history and now Congressional Republicans want to stop the President ’ s wishes for providing more in COVID payments to the people .
Joe Biden manufactured 20 million or more votes in the 2020 election in November to steal the race away from record setter President Trump and the Republicans in the House and Senate say nothing .
Now this same group wants to prevent Americans from receiving more than $ 600 in payments in a COVID package ?
These individuals are not for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election with more votes than any candidate ever .
He crushed the old record set by Barack Obama in 2008 of 69 million .
President Trump became the first candidate in US history to surpass 70 million votes .
His rallies and unscripted boat parades , car parades and more indicated a big win , but his win was extraordinary .
Of course , the President ’ s opponent was very weak .
This is why it is totally ridiculous unreasonable nonsense to even suggest that senile and basement dwelling Joe Biden overcame @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This was a steal .
It was the biggest criminal steal in world history and it must not be allowed .
TRENDING : JUST IN : President Trump Announces 26 New Christmas Pardons Including Paul Manafort and Roger Stone But the Republicans in the House and Senate are blind to the results .
They believe Biden won 20 million or more votes than he really received reaching over 80 million to become the first candidate in history to do so .
They remain silent as if they are part of the steal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this as the Republicans in Congress were caught acting behind the scenes attempting to stop President Trump ’ s ask to give Americans more money due to Americans challenges with COVID .
It ’ s time to let these politicians know we won ’ t put up with a steal and we won ’ t all China to run our country .
Americans must demand that these people do their job .
They are there for us not for themselves and China .
Americans won this election and own this country .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s time they acted like they do .

First no response from the Republicans on the most obvious and corrupt election in world history and now Congressional Republicans want to stop the President’s wishes for providing more in COVID payments to the people.
Joe Biden manufactured 20 million or more votes in the 2020 election in November to steal the race away from record setter President Trump and the Republicans in the House and Senate say nothing. Now this same group wants to prevent Americans from receiving more than $600 in payments in a COVID package? These individuals are not for the people.
President Trump won the 2020 election with more votes than any candidate ever. He crushed the old record set by Barack Obama in 2008 of 69 million. President Trump became the first candidate in US history to surpass 70 million votes. His rallies and unscripted boat parades, car parades and more indicated a big win, but his win was extraordinary.
Of course, the President’s opponent was very weak. This is why it is totally ridiculous unreasonable nonsense to even suggest that senile and basement dwelling Joe Biden overcame this record and won the 2020 election. This was a steal. It was the biggest criminal steal in world history and it must not be allowed.
But the Republicans in the House and Senate are blind to the results. They believe Biden won 20 million or more votes than he really received reaching over 80 million to become the first candidate in history to do so. They remain silent as if they are part of the steal.
Yesterday, there was more proof of this as the Republicans in Congress were caught acting behind the scenes attempting to stop President Trump’s ask to give Americans more money due to Americans challenges with COVID.
Mediaite reports:
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) on Wednesday ended a call with House Republicans after they began leaking to the media about his effort to kill a proposal that would include direct $2,000 payments to Americans.
It’s time to let these politicians know we won’t put up with a steal and we won’t allow China to run our country.
.@realdonaldtrump deserves his day in court, AND we are definitely going to give him his day in Congress. We have a rapidly growing group of House Members and Senators. Jan 6 challenge is on. 🇺🇸 Call your Rep: 202-225-3121 Call your Senators: 202-224-3121#FightForTrump! pic.twitter.com/O9YvytKlrS — Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) December 21, 2020
Americans must demand that these people do their job. They are there for us not for themselves and China. Americans won this election and own this country. They work for us. It’s time they acted like they do.


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-24--NY Times’ Maggie Haberman Attacks President Trump Over White House Reporters Having to Work Early on

NY Times’ Maggie Haberman Attacks President Trump Over White House Reporters Having to Work Early on Christmas Eve

President Trump left the White House Wednesday afternoon to spend Christmas at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach , Florida .
The White House press office released the daily guidance and press schedule for Thursday that noted a call time for the out of town press pool of 7:30 a.m. That triggered New York Times White House reporter Maggie Haberman to lash out at Trump , accusing him of sticking it to the press out of hatred by setting an early morning start time on Christmas Eve .
“ A way to stick it to the WH press corps he hates is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Eve for a currently empty public schedule ” Reporters were also put out that the notice also included a statement on the President ’ s work activities .
TRENDING : JUST IN : President Trump Announces 26 New Christmas Pardons Including Paul Manafort and Roger Stone On a related note , President Trump signed a bill Wednesday for a memorial to fallen journalists .
On Wednesday , December 23 , 2020 , the President signed into law : H.R .
3465 , the “ Fallen Journalist Memorial Act , which authorizes the Fallen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work in the District of Columbia to commemorate America ’ s commitment to a free press by honoring journalist who sacrificed their lives to that cause ;

President Trump left the White House Wednesday afternoon to spend Christmas at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida. The White House press office released the daily guidance and press schedule for Thursday that noted a call time for the out of town press pool of 7:30 a.m. That triggered New York Times White House reporter Maggie Haberman to lash out at Trump, accusing him of sticking it to the press out of hatred by setting an early morning start time on Christmas Eve.
“A way to stick it to the WH press corps he hates is a 7:30 AM call time on Christmas Eve for a currently empty public schedule”
A way to stick it to the WH press corps he hates is a 7:30 AM call time on Christmas Eve for a currently empty public schedule https://t.co/yqdfyBYMeL — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) December 24, 2020
Reporters were also put out that the notice also included a statement on the President’s work activities.
Examples of reaction to Haberman:
Reporters complaining about working near the beach in 70° sunshine while millions of Americans can’t work is about as out of touch as it gets https://t.co/VYsWLXIsOA — Jon Street (@JonStreet) December 24, 2020
People who've never missed a paycheck, who spent the year lecturing people to stay home and shut up as they went broke, whining about someone having to show up to their overpaid job early is my favorite Twitter. #Caring https://t.co/lPj7Mm3MYX — Derek Hunter (@derekahunter) December 24, 2020
There are U.S. troops all over the world, many with young families, who will not be home for Christmas. I think the WH press corps will be okay. https://t.co/fEqfAxjkBN — Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) December 24, 2020
On a related note, President Trump signed a bill Wednesday for a memorial to fallen journalists.


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-24--Newt Gingrich Says He ‘Will Not Accept Joe Biden As President’

Millions of Americans do not accept the outcome of the 2020 election .
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is one of them .
The irregularities in voting , the flooding of the country with mail-in ballots , the pausing of vote counting in the middle of the night and more .
When you put it all together , it ’ s just too much to bear .
Gingrich made his thoughts known in a recent op-ed for the Washington Times : Why I will not accept Joe Biden as president TRENDING : JUST IN : President Trump Announces 26 New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Stone A smart friend of mine who is a moderate liberal asked why I was not recognizing Joe Biden ’ s victory .
The friend made the case that Mr. Biden had gotten more votes , and historically we recognize the person with the most votes .
Normally , we accept the outcome of elections just as we accept the outcomes of sporting events .
So , my friend asked why was 2020 different ?
Having spent more than four years watching the left # Resist President Donald Trump and focus entirely on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it took me several days to understand the depth of my own feelings .
As I thought about it , I realized my anger and fear were not narrowly focused on votes .
My unwillingness to relax and accept that the election grew out of a level of outrage and alienation unlike anything I had experienced in more than 60 years involvement in public affairs .
The challenge is that I — and other conservatives — are not disagreeing with the left within a commonly understood world .
We live in alternative worlds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way .

Millions of Americans do not accept the outcome of the 2020 election. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is one of them.
The irregularities in voting, the flooding of the country with mail-in ballots, the pausing of vote counting in the middle of the night and more. When you put it all together, it’s just too much to bear.
Gingrich made his thoughts known in a recent op-ed for the Washington Times:
Why I will not accept Joe Biden as president A smart friend of mine who is a moderate liberal asked why I was not recognizing Joe Biden’s victory. The friend made the case that Mr. Biden had gotten more votes, and historically we recognize the person with the most votes. Normally, we accept the outcome of elections just as we accept the outcomes of sporting events. So, my friend asked why was 2020 different? Having spent more than four years watching the left #Resist President Donald Trump and focus entirely on undoing and undermining the 2016 election, it took me several days to understand the depth of my own feelings. As I thought about it, I realized my anger and fear were not narrowly focused on votes. My unwillingness to relax and accept that the election grew out of a level of outrage and alienation unlike anything I had experienced in more than 60 years involvement in public affairs. The challenge is that I — and other conservatives — are not disagreeing with the left within a commonly understood world. We live in alternative worlds.
Read the rest here.
Trump tweeted about it:
“@NewtGingrich Pens Op-Ed on Election Saying he will not Accept Joe Biden as President” @OANN Newt Gingrich gets it, we are going to WIN! https://t.co/PBHZo2LLNu pic.twitter.com/uG2HjCEo9G — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 23, 2020
Millions of Americans feel the same way.
Cross posted from American Lookout.


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-24--Weissmann Lashes Out at Trump Over Manafort, Stone Pardons – Cooks Up New Plot to Prosecute Them for

Weissmann Lashes Out at Trump Over Manafort, Stone Pardons – Cooks Up New Plot to Prosecute Them for Perjury and Obstruction

President Trump on Wednesday evening asserted his authority and announced 26 new Christmas pardons including ones to Paul Manafort and Roger Stone .
Trump ’ s 2016 campaign manager Paul Manafort was hunted down by Mueller ’ s goons after he helped President Trump win the 2016 election .
Manafort was sentenced to 7 years in prison for tax evasion and other crimes stemming from his Ukrainian lobbying .
Andrew Weissmann , the real prosecutor in charge of Mueller ’ s witch hunt lashed out at President Trump on Wednesday night following his pardon of Manafort and Stone .
TRENDING @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 26 New Christmas Pardons Including Paul Manafort and Roger Stone Weissmann took the pardons personally since he ’ s the one who hunted down people in Trump ’ s orbit and persecuted them .
Weissmann cooked up a new plot to prosecute both Manafort and Stone .
“ Easy enough to beat Trump at his game : put Stone and Manafort in the grand jury after 1/20/21 to get at what they have hidden from the government about Trump- and if they then lie , they can be prosecuted for perjury and obstruction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wednesday night .
When people suggested that Paul Manafort and Roger Stone could just invoke their 5th Amendment rights , he said it ’ s a non issue .
“ The fifth amendment issue is a non issue .
Yes , those pardoned may still have a colorable fifth amendment claim but , even if they do , the government can immunize them and require them to testify in the grand jury .
If they then lie they face criminal prosecution , ” Weissmann said .

Andrew Weissmann
President Trump on Wednesday evening asserted his authority and announced 26 new Christmas pardons including ones to Paul Manafort and Roger Stone.
Trump’s 2016 campaign manager Paul Manafort was hunted down by Mueller’s goons after he helped President Trump win the 2016 election.
Manafort was sentenced to 7 years in prison for tax evasion and other crimes stemming from his Ukrainian lobbying.
Andrew Weissmann, the real prosecutor in charge of Mueller’s witch hunt lashed out at President Trump on Wednesday night following his pardon of Manafort and Stone.
Weissmann took the pardons personally since he’s the one who hunted down people in Trump’s orbit and persecuted them.
Weissmann cooked up a new plot to prosecute both Manafort and Stone.
“Easy enough to beat Trump at his game: put Stone and Manafort in the grand jury after 1/20/21 to get at what they have hidden from the government about Trump- and if they then lie, they can be prosecuted for perjury and obstruction,” Weissmann said in a tweet Wednesday night.
Easy enough to beat Trump at his game: put Stone and Manafort in the grand jury after 1/20/21 to get at what they have hidden from the government about Trump- and if they then lie, they can be prosecuted for perjury and obstruction. — Andrew Weissmann (@AWeissmann_) December 24, 2020
When people suggested that Paul Manafort and Roger Stone could just invoke their 5th Amendment rights, he said it’s a non issue.
“The fifth amendment issue is a non issue. Yes, those pardoned may still have a colorable fifth amendment claim but, even if they do, the government can immunize them and require them to testify in the grand jury. If they then lie they face criminal prosecution,” Weissmann said.


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-25--A Focus on the Georgia Election Fraud – President Trump Won This State By a Landslide – Current Resu

A Focus on the Georgia Election Fraud – President Trump Won This State By a Landslide – Current Results Are Totally Fraudulent (VIDEO)

Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP 's founder , Jim Hoft .
His posts have been retweeted by @ @ @ @ @ the headlines at the Drudge Report .
Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong @ @ @ @ @ for his work , which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current @ @ @ @ @ degrees or designations and is the author of three books .
His new book : @ @ @ @ @ Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics ' is out now - please take a look and @ @ @ @

Joe Hoft is a Radio Host at TNTRadio.live, Author, Former International Corporate Executive in Hong Kong for a Decade, and a Contributor at TGP since 2016. Joe is the author of five books, including his new bestseller, "The Steal: Volume II - The Impossible Occurs" which addresses the stolen 2020 Election and provides an inventory of issues that prove that the 2020 Election was uncertifiable and never should have been certified for Joe Biden.
You can email Joe Hoft here, and read more of Joe Hoft's articles here.


thegatewaypundit--2020-12-25--THEY’RE LYING TO YOU: WHO Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity from Their Website

TGP first reported on March 17 , 2020 , on the controversial Ethiopian politician and WHO Director General , Tedros , and his irresponsible and criminal fear mongering .
Tedros claimed in a press conference in early March that the fatality rate for the coronavirus was 3.4 % .
He then compared this rate to the rate of the common flu which is estimated to be around 0.1 % .
This was a lie .
We knew it then and reported on it .
He manipulated data to make this statement .
This egregiously false premise led to the greatest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Barack Obama Relaxes as Michelle Obama Does All the Work and Muscles Through Christmas Kayak Trip in Hawaii Here is the video of Dr. Ghebreyesus ’ s remarks .
The problems with his claims were that he didn ’ t explain that the estimate of mortality rates for the flu included millions of individuals who had the flu but were not tested or identified with the flu .
( Every year there are millions of Americans in this category . )
The calculation he used for COVID-19 was different and not adjusted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similarly have COVID-19 and not be confirmed or tested for it .
We were criticized for this observation but then in June , the CDC announced a similar estimated number of Americans had the China coronavirus but have not been tested and confirmed for having it .
The CDC estimated a minimum of 20 million Americans at that time had COVID-19 resulting in the mortality rates for the China coronavirus in the US being very similar to that of the common flu confirming what we reported in March .
The WHO continues to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and health care organization second or third .
The WHO recently redefined herd immunity in their attempt to promote the global COVID19 vaccine .
This is a sinister and dishonest attempt to rewrite science in order to favor their vaccination scheme .
Via The American Institute of Economic Research : The World Health Organization , for reasons unknown , has suddenly changed its definition of a core conception of immunology : herd immunity .
Its discovery was one of the major achievements of 20th century science , gradually emerging in the 1920s and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 20th century .
Herd immunity is a fascinating observation that you can trace to biological reality or statistical probability theory , whichever you prefer .
( It is certainly not a “ strategy ” so ignore any media source that describes it that way . )
Herd immunity speaks directly , and with explanatory power , to the empirical observation that respiratory viruses are either widespread and mostly mild ( common cold ) or very severe and short-lived ( Ebola ) … …This strange institution called the World Health Organization – once glorious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eradication of smallpox – has suddenly decided to delete everything I just wrote from cell biology basics .
It has literally changed the science in a Soviet-like way .
It has removed with the delete key any mention of natural immunities from its website .
It has taken the additional step of actually mischaracterizing the structure and functioning of vaccines .
So that you will believe me , I will try to be as precise as possible .
Here is the website from June 9 , 2020 .
You can see it here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down the page and click on the question about herd immunity .
You see the following .
…However , in a screenshot dated November 13 , 2020 , we read the following note that somehow pretends as if human beings do not have immune systems at all but rather rely entirely on big pharma to inject things into our blood .

TGP first reported on March 17, 2020, on the controversial Ethiopian politician and WHO Director General, Tedros, and his irresponsible and criminal fear mongering. Tedros claimed in a press conference in early March that the fatality rate for the coronavirus was 3.4%. He then compared this rate to the rate of the common flu which is estimated to be around 0.1%.
This was a lie. We knew it then and reported on it. He manipulated data to make this statement. This egregiously false premise led to the greatest global panic in world history.
Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected.
Here is the video of Dr. Ghebreyesus’s remarks.
The problems with his claims were that he didn’t explain that the estimate of mortality rates for the flu included millions of individuals who had the flu but were not tested or identified with the flu. (Every year there are millions of Americans in this category.) The calculation he used for COVID-19 was different and not adjusted for the millions of individuals who would similarly have COVID-19 and not be confirmed or tested for it.
We were criticized for this observation but then in June, the CDC announced a similar estimated number of Americans had the China coronavirus but have not been tested and confirmed for having it. The CDC estimated a minimum of 20 million Americans at that time had COVID-19 resulting in the mortality rates for the China coronavirus in the US being very similar to that of the common flu confirming what we reported in March.
The WHO continues to show it is a political organization first and health care organization second or third.
The WHO recently redefined herd immunity in their attempt to promote the global COVID19 vaccine.
This is a sinister and dishonest attempt to rewrite science in order to favor their vaccination scheme.
Via The American Institute of Economic Research: