thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--Pro-Iranian Regime US Senator Held Secret Meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif in Munich, Ger

Pro-Iranian Regime US Senator Held Secret Meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif in Munich, Germany

Pro-Iranian Regime US Senator Held Secret Meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif in Munich , Germany In early January the United States killed General Qassim Soleimani , a top commander of Iran ’ s al-Quds Force , in an airstrike at Baghdad ’ s International Airport .
The strike also killed Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis , the deputy commander of Iran-backed militias known as the Popular Mobilization Forces .
Seven people were reportedly killed in the airstrike .
Following the death of Commander Soleimani Democrat Senator Chris Murphy ( D-Conn. ) lashed out at President Trump for assassinating the Iranian al-Quds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths and maiming of HUNDREDS of US soldiers .
It soon became apparent why Murphy was sooo upset with Soleimani ’ s death .
Senator Murphy has a history of supporting Iran ’ s mullahs .
Murphy is a routine speaker at the NIAC Council , the regime ’ s lobby house in the US .
In fact , Trita Parsi , the regime ’ s top activist at NIAC , has praised Senator Murphy for his support of NIAC ’ s efforts .
NIAC ’ s Trita Parsi praised Sen. Murphy in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Iran deal .
It would be interesting to discover Senator Murphy ’ s financial links to this group and others .
This past weekend Senator Murphy was caught meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Zarif in a secret meeting in Munich .
Another clear Logan Act violator….who will likely be ignored by most media , not even be reprimanded by his peers , much less punished .
Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut and other Democratic senators had a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security @ @ @ @ @ @ @ source briefed by the French delegation to the conference .
Murphy ’ s office did not respond to repeated requests for comment by press time .
Such a meeting would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump ’ s administration .
In February 2017 , Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia .

In early January the United States killed General Qassim Soleimani, a top commander of Iran’s al-Quds Force, in an airstrike at Baghdad’s International Airport. The strike also killed Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the deputy commander of Iran-backed militias known as the Popular Mobilization Forces. Seven people were reportedly killed in the airstrike.
Following the death of Commander Soleimani Democrat Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) lashed out at President Trump for assassinating the Iranian al-Quds terrorist leader who was responsible for the deaths and maiming of HUNDREDS of US soldiers.
It soon became apparent why Murphy was sooo upset with Soleimani’s death.
Senator Murphy has a history of supporting Iran’s mullahs.
Murphy is a routine speaker at the NIAC Council, the regime’s lobby house in the US.
In fact, Trita Parsi, the regime’s top activist at NIAC, has praised Senator Murphy for his support of NIAC’s efforts.
NIAC’s Trita Parsi praised Sen. Murphy in 2015 for being a “hero” of the Iran deal.
It would be interesting to discover Senator Murphy’s financial links to this group and others.
This past weekend Senator Murphy was caught meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Zarif in a secret meeting in Munich.
Another clear Logan Act violator….who will likely be ignored by most media, not even be reprimanded by his peers, much less punished.
The Federalist reported:
Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut and other Democratic senators had a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference last week, according to a source briefed by the French delegation to the conference. Murphy’s office did not respond to repeated requests for comment by press time. Such a meeting would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia.


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--New Book Reveals Explosive Details About Loretta Lynch-Bill Clinton Tarmac Meeting

Remember that coincidental meeting in 2016 of Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on a tarmac in Phoenix ?
The two just chatted about their grandchildren and golf and , whoosh , off they went , each to their own destination .
At least , that ’ s what they said .
But the timing was always odd .
The former president ’ s wife , former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton , was under FBI investigation over her secret email server and her deletion of more than 30,000 emails ; Lynch just happened to be Attorney General — the nation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the time .
“ We knew something had occurred that was a bit unusual .
It was a planned meeting .
It was not a coincidence , ” journalist Christopher Sign told “ Fox & Friends ” on Monday .
Sign is the author of a new book , “ Secret on the Tarmac , ” in which he reveals new details about the supposedly coincidental meeting — when the planes of Bill Clinton and Lynch just happened to be on the same tarmac and the two met for 37 minutes ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grand kids and golf ) .
The meeting happened just a few days before the FBI decided it would not recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton .
Those recommendations would have gone to Lynch , but after word emerged that she and Bill Clinton had met on the tarmac , Lynch recused herself , saying she would simply accept whatever recommendation the FBI made .
Then-FBI Director Jim Comey recommended no charges and Lynch washed her hands of the probe .
Sign said : the book “ details everything that they don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they think you forgot , but Bill Clinton was on that plane for 20 minutes and it wasn ’ t just about golf , grandkids , and Brexit .
There ’ s so much that doesn ’ t add up , ” Fox News reports .
He said that his source who was there outlined that when Clinton arrived at the airport , he was waiting for Lynch .
“ He then sat and waited in his car with the motorcade , her airstairs come down , most of her staff gets off @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Secret Service and FBI are figuring out ‘ How in the world are we supposed to handle this ?
What are we supposed to do ?
’ ” Sign said .
“ As journalists , you have to ask yourself , why are people not delving into this ?
Why are we not looking into what exactly happened ?
Sign said that Lynch in December of 2018 testified before the House Oversight Committee .
“ She mentioned that Bill Clinton flattered her , talked about Eric Holder , talked about how things were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ job performance , not this golf-grandkids , Brexit.
” Lynch was interviewed by lawmakers and staff of the House Judiciary Committee and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on Dec. 19 , 2018 .
While a transcript was not released , Real Clear Politics got a copy .
“ The day after the tarmac meeting , Lynch held a press conference to talk about local police policies , ” RCP wrote last May .
“ Christopher Sign , the morning anchor for the ABC affiliate in Phoenix , asked her what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about on her jet the evening before .
She said it was just pleasantries : ‘ Our conversation was a great deal about his grandchildren , ’ she said to reporters .
They also talked about their travels , golf , former Attorney General Janet Reno and West Virginia .
‘ It was primarily social , ’ Lynch said , assuring everyone “ there was no discussion of any matter pending for the [ Justice ] department or any matter pending for any other body.
” According to the way the airport tarmac @ @ @ @ @ @ @ downplay the get-together , Lynch and Clinton somehow crossed paths coming to and from Phoenix on their private planes .
Typical was a “ person familiar with the meeting ” who tried to explain it to the press like this : “ The former president , who was departing the airport on a private jet , noticed Lynch ’ s plane had arrived and decided to go over and say hello.
” The suggestion was that it was a chance meeting .
It was anything but .
Loretta Lynch described to the joint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Phoenix , where the next day she would be visiting the local police department .
She explained there was a standard protocol for getting everyone off the plane : They would always deplane in a series , “ security detail first , my staff [ next ] , and then I would leave and go immediately to the car.
” Security exited , then the staff , all as per normal .
But before Lynch and her husband , Stephen Hargrove , who was travelling with her , could get out of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the standard procedure .
“ As we walked to the door , the head of my security detail came to me and said : ‘ Ma ’ am , I ’ ve been informed … that former President Clinton is also at the airfield and would like to say hello.
’ ” According to Lynch ’ s testimony , she didn ’ t have the opportunity to think about whether that was a good idea : Her head of security had barely finished talking and “ former President Clinton was standing in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to work the room ( or perhaps we should say the fuselage ) .
After a cursory hello to Lynch and her husband , Clinton greeted her “ security detail officer , shook his hand , and then stepped toward the back of the plane ” where there “ were two members of the flight crew.
” Clinton lavished them with attention .
According to the former AG ’ s congressional interview , Clinton “ said hello to them , shook their hand , spent about five minutes talking with both of those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with this : Let ’ s assume for the sake of argument that Lynch was not lying to Congress .
If so , it seems to have dawned on her rather late that Clinton had compromised her , had put her in a jam .
What if that ’ s exactly what he set out to do ?
It would explain the ex-president ’ s otherwise inexplicable behavior — how one of the great glad-handers of all time leapt onto a plane in order to bore everyone to death .
He was anything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the attorney general that he could cause her real trouble , and could do so with cheerful impunity .
He didn ’ t have to make heavy-handed threats or otherwise put himself at risk of an obstruction of justice charge .
No , all he had to do was darken the airplane doorway and prattle on with seeming obliviousness about grandkids , travel plans , coal mining , golf , and Brexit .
In the wake of that bravura performance , Lynch had to convene working groups to determine whether she needed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ She would untimately decide against recusal , but said she would accept the decision of career staff and the FBI on whether to prosecute .
What a mess .
And what a splendidly innocent way of causing mayhem and conveying menace .
Give Bill Clinton his due — the man is no amateur .

Remember that coincidental meeting in 2016 of Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on a tarmac in Phoenix?
The two just chatted about their grandchildren and golf and, whoosh, off they went, each to their own destination.
At least, that’s what they said. But the timing was always odd. The former president’s wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was under FBI investigation over her secret email server and her deletion of more than 30,000 emails; Lynch just happened to be Attorney General — the nation’s highest law enforcement official — at the time.
“We knew something had occurred that was a bit unusual. It was a planned meeting. It was not a coincidence,” journalist Christopher Sign told “Fox & Friends” on Monday.
Sign is the author of a new book, “Secret on the Tarmac,” in which he reveals new details about the supposedly coincidental meeting — when the planes of Bill Clinton and Lynch just happened to be on the same tarmac and the two met for 37 minutes (an awful long time to talk about grand kids and golf).
The meeting happened just a few days before the FBI decided it would not recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton. Those recommendations would have gone to Lynch, but after word emerged that she and Bill Clinton had met on the tarmac, Lynch recused herself, saying she would simply accept whatever recommendation the FBI made. Then-FBI Director Jim Comey recommended no charges and Lynch washed her hands of the probe.
Sign said: the book “details everything that they don’t want you to know and everything they think you forgot, but Bill Clinton was on that plane for 20 minutes and it wasn’t just about golf, grandkids, and Brexit. There’s so much that doesn’t add up,” Fox News reports.
He said that his source who was there outlined that when Clinton arrived at the airport, he was waiting for Lynch. “He then sat and waited in his car with the motorcade, her airstairs come down, most of her staff gets off, he then gets on as the Secret Service and FBI are figuring out ‘How in the world are we supposed to handle this? What are we supposed to do?’” Sign said. “As journalists, you have to ask yourself, why are people not delving into this? Why are we not looking into what exactly happened? Sign said that Lynch in December of 2018 testified before the House Oversight Committee. “She mentioned that Bill Clinton flattered her, talked about Eric Holder, talked about how things were going at Justice, talked about her job performance, not this golf-grandkids, Brexit.”
Lynch was interviewed by lawmakers and staff of the House Judiciary Committee and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on Dec. 19, 2018. While a transcript was not released, Real Clear Politics got a copy.
“The day after the tarmac meeting, Lynch held a press conference to talk about local police policies,” RCP wrote last May. “Christopher Sign, the morning anchor for the ABC affiliate in Phoenix, asked her what she had been talking with Bill Clinton about on her jet the evening before. She said it was just pleasantries: ‘Our conversation was a great deal about his grandchildren,’ she said to reporters. They also talked about their travels, golf, former Attorney General Janet Reno and West Virginia. ‘It was primarily social,’ Lynch said, assuring everyone “there was no discussion of any matter pending for the [Justice] department or any matter pending for any other body.”
According to the way the airport tarmac meeting is described by those trying to downplay the get-together, Lynch and Clinton somehow crossed paths coming to and from Phoenix on their private planes. Typical was a “person familiar with the meeting” who tried to explain it to the press like this: “The former president, who was departing the airport on a private jet, noticed Lynch’s plane had arrived and decided to go over and say hello.” The suggestion was that it was a chance meeting. It was anything but. Loretta Lynch described to the joint House committees landing on a hot evening in Phoenix, where the next day she would be visiting the local police department. She explained there was a standard protocol for getting everyone off the plane: They would always deplane in a series, “security detail first, my staff [next], and then I would leave and go immediately to the car.” Security exited, then the staff, all as per normal. But before Lynch and her husband, Stephen Hargrove, who was travelling with her, could get out of the plane there was an interruption of the standard procedure. “As we walked to the door, the head of my security detail came to me and said: ‘Ma’am, I’ve been informed … that former President Clinton is also at the airfield and would like to say hello.’” According to Lynch’s testimony, she didn’t have the opportunity to think about whether that was a good idea: Her head of security had barely finished talking and “former President Clinton was standing in the doorway of the plane.” He proceeded to work the room (or perhaps we should say the fuselage). After a cursory hello to Lynch and her husband, Clinton greeted her “security detail officer, shook his hand, and then stepped toward the back of the plane” where there “were two members of the flight crew.” Clinton lavished them with attention. According to the former AG’s congressional interview, Clinton “said hello to them, shook their hand, spent about five minutes talking with both of those two individuals.”
The RCP piece concluded with this:


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--WikiLeaks Locked Out of Twitter Account One Week Before Julian Assange’s Extradition Hearing Begins

WikiLeaks Locked Out of Twitter Account One Week Before Julian Assange ’ s Extradition Hearing Begins WikiLeaks has been locked out of their Twitter account just one week before Julian Assange ’ s extradition hearing is scheduled to begin in the UK .
WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief Kristinn Hrafnsson tweeted on Monday that “ all attempts to get it reopened via regular channels have been unsuccessful .
It has been impossible to reach a human at twitter to resolve the issue.
” A source familiar with the situation explained to the Gateway Pundit that WikiLeaks social media admins received an automated email @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to reset their password to regain access , but were not able to do so .
They were unsure about the reason for the email in the first place — whether it was a glitch from Twitter , a targeted effort , or a hack .
The source said that when the WikiLeaks admins attempted to change the password and log in they received responses from Twitter saying that they were unable to verify them as the owner of the account and that the email on file did not match the one that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are indeed using the same email that has been associated with the account for years .
Efforts by WikiLeaks to reach someone at Twitter , since the 9th , have been unsuccessful .
Assange ’ s extradition hearing is scheduled to begin on February 24 at Belmarsh Magistrates Courts , which is a court under the jurisdiction of South London Magistrates Courts .
Assange faces charges under the Espionage Act in the United States for his publication of the Iraq and Afghan War Logs .
If extradited and convicted , he could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the “ crime ” of publishing material that the US government did not want the public to know .
The Gateway Pundit has reached out to Twitter ’ s press office and will update this article if more information is provided .

WikiLeaks has been locked out of their Twitter account just one week before Julian Assange’s extradition hearing is scheduled to begin in the UK.
WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief Kristinn Hrafnsson tweeted on Monday that “all attempts to get it reopened via regular channels have been unsuccessful. It has been impossible to reach a human at twitter to resolve the issue.”
WikiLeaks twitter account has been locked, shortly before Assange extradition hearing. All attempts to get it reopened via regular channels have been unsuccessful. It has been impossible to reach a human at twitter to resolve the issue. Can someone fix this?@twittersupport @jack — Kristinn Hrafnsson (@khrafnsson) February 17, 2020
A source familiar with the situation explained to the Gateway Pundit that WikiLeaks social media admins received an automated email on February 9 saying that they needed to reset their password to regain access, but were not able to do so. They were unsure about the reason for the email in the first place — whether it was a glitch from Twitter, a targeted effort, or a hack.
The source said that when the WikiLeaks admins attempted to change the password and log in they received responses from Twitter saying that they were unable to verify them as the owner of the account and that the email on file did not match the one that they were using. WikiLeaks maintains that they are indeed using the same email that has been associated with the account for years.
Efforts by WikiLeaks to reach someone at Twitter, since the 9th, have been unsuccessful.
Assange’s extradition hearing is scheduled to begin on February 24 at Belmarsh Magistrates Courts, which is a court under the jurisdiction of South London Magistrates Courts.
Assange faces charges under the Espionage Act in the United States for his publication of the Iraq and Afghan War Logs. If extradited and convicted, he could face a maximum sentence of 175 years for the “crime” of publishing material that the US government did not want the public to know.
On Monday evening, a Twitter spokesperson confirmed to The Gateway Pundit that the “account was locked due to indicators it was compromised.”
The Gateway Pundit has responded to Twitter’s statement with additional questions and will update this article if more information is provided.


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--Impeachment Documents Signed By President Donald Trump Are Up For Auction

Impeachment Documents Signed By President Donald Trump Are Up For Auction A copy of the Committee of the Judiciary House of Representatives ’ motion to impeach President Donald Trump is up for auction by Goldin Auctions .
The current high bid is $ 20,400 , including buyer ’ s premium , with five days left of bidding .
The full report is signed in Trump ’ s signature Sharpie across the front page .
President Trump was impeached on December 18 , while at a rally in Battle Creek , Michigan , when he was asked to sign a copy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jonathan Moore , a member of the U.S. Department of State .
“ While at the rally , while the House was debating the impeachment and just prior to the full votes , according the notarized letter of provenance that accompanies this thick packet , Trump signed the title page of this multi-hundred-page document in black pen , ” the auction description reads .
“ Trump signed his name in bold black marker across the page .
A unique piece of history having the sitting US President multi-signing the document that led to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his letter of provenance that he “ attended President Trump ’ s rally in Battle Creek , Michigan on December 17th , 2019 and asked him to sign the Articles of Impeachment that I handed him , and he happily complied .
The President had been impeached by Congress just hours earlier.
” While signing the articles of impeachment , House Speaker Nancy Pelosi used 30 different pens to sign her name .
Those pens are estimated to be worth some $ 1.5 million .
“ Maryland-based Alexander Historical Auctions said that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pelosi used to sign the articles of impeachment against President Trump could fetch up to $ 50,000 each at auction , ” The Washington Examiner reported .

A copy of the Committee of the Judiciary House of Representatives’ motion to impeach President Donald Trump is up for auction by Goldin Auctions.
The current high bid is $20,400, including buyer’s premium, with five days left of bidding.
The full report is signed in Trump’s signature Sharpie across the front page.
President Trump was impeached on December 18, while at a rally in Battle Creek, Michigan, when he was asked to sign a copy of the document by a man named Jonathan Moore, a member of the U.S. Department of State.
Donald Trump signed a copy of his impeachment documents. @GoldinAuctions is selling it. Top bid is $20,400, including buyer’s premium, with a week to go. pic.twitter.com/mZgC1i4ux4 — Darren Rovell (@darrenrovell) February 17, 2020
“While at the rally, while the House was debating the impeachment and just prior to the full votes, according the notarized letter of provenance that accompanies this thick packet, Trump signed the title page of this multi-hundred-page document in black pen,” the auction description reads. “Trump signed his name in bold black marker across the page. A unique piece of history having the sitting US President multi-signing the document that led to his historic impeachment.”
Moore states in his letter of provenance that he “attended President Trump’s rally in Battle Creek, Michigan on December 17th, 2019 and asked him to sign the Articles of Impeachment that I handed him, and he happily complied. The President had been impeached by Congress just hours earlier.”
While signing the articles of impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi used 30 different pens to sign her name. Those pens are estimated to be worth some $1.5 million.
“Maryland-based Alexander Historical Auctions said that the 30 customized, black and gold pens Pelosi used to sign the articles of impeachment against President Trump could fetch up to $50,000 each at auction,” The Washington Examiner reported.


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--What is Wrong with Old Joe? Biden in Las Vegas: ‘We Need New Technologies Just Like Here in Californ

What is Wrong with Old Joe? Biden in Las Vegas: ‘We Need New Technologies Just Like Here in California!’ (VIDEO)

What is Wrong with Old Joe ?
Biden in Las Vegas : ‘ We Need New Technologies Just Like Here @ @ @ @ @ VIDEO ) 77-year-old Joe Biden confused Nevada and California this weekend while talking to a @ @ @ @ @ “ The new technologies are capable of doing so much more .
For example , @ @ @ @ @ why at our ports we don ’ t have solar capacity to be able to @ @ @ @ @ lot of energy , create a lot of new jobs for people out there , @ @ @ @ @ – I mean – here in Nevada , ” said Biden .
Joe Biden is @ @ @ @ @ be president and he knows it .
Biden recently told an Iowa crowd that he @ @ @ @ @ because he ’ s old and may die in office .
“ Whomever I pick @ @ @ @ @ “ be capable of being president , because I ’ m an old guy — @ @ @ @ @ !
” Biden said .

77-year-old Joe Biden confused Nevada and California this weekend while talking to a crowd in Las Vegas.
“The new technologies are capable of doing so much more. For example, there’s no reason why at our ports we don’t have solar capacity to be able to make sure we save a lot of energy, create a lot of new jobs for people out there, just like here in California – I mean – here in Nevada,” said Biden.
WATCH:
"Here in California" – Joe Biden, while in Nevada pic.twitter.com/77zMaSWynG — Abigail Marone 🇺🇸 (@abigailmarone) February 16, 2020
Joe Biden is too old and demented to be president and he knows it.
Biden recently told an Iowa crowd that he needs a strong Vice President because he’s old and may die in office.
“Whomever I pick” for VP, must “be capable of being president, because I’m an old guy — no I’m serious!” Biden said.


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--Lawmakers Introduce Bill That Would Stop Grants to Sanctuary States That Give Driver’s Licenses to I

Lawmakers Introduce Bill That Would Stop Grants to Sanctuary States That Give Driver’s Licenses to Illegal Immigrants

Lawmakers Introduce Bill That Would Stop Grants to Sanctuary States That Give Driver ’ s Licenses to Illegal Immigrants House and Senate Republicans have introduced legislation that would block certain federal funds from sanctuary states that allow illegal aliens to obtain driver ’ s licenses .
The Stop Greenlighting Driver Licenses for Illegal Immigrants Act would stop Justice Department ( DOJ ) grants that are a top source of federal criminal justice funding for states .
The legislation would target states that “ defy federal immigration enforcement or that allow illegal aliens to get driver licenses without proof of lawful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or restrict a local or State government entity or official from collecting or sending to or receiving from the Department of Homeland Security immigration enforcement information.
” In the Senate , the legislation is being introduced by Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn and co-sponsored by Sens .
Tom Cotton , R-Ark .
; Kevin Cramer , R-N.D. ; Shelley Moore Capito , R-W.Va. ; Kelly Loeffler , R-Ga. ; Joni Ernst , R-Iowa , and Mike Rounds , R-S.D .
Companion legislation is being introduced in the House by Colorado Rep. Ken Buck .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawmakers .
“ Tennesseans know all too well what can happen when illegal immigrants are granted driver licenses , ” Blackburn said in a statement .
“ While Tennessee and many other states prohibit driver licenses for illegal aliens , a growing number of states are moving in the opposite direction and unleashing dangerous open borders policies .
Immigrants must follow the proper federal process and obtain citizenship or lawful status before obtaining a state driver license.
” “ In America , no one is above the law , ” she added .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that issued licenses to illegal aliens received nearly $ 53 million that would be impacted by this new legislation during the 2019 fiscal year .
The NCSL reports that fifteen states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws to allow unauthorized immigrants to obtain drivers licenses .
These states—California , Colorado , Connecticut , Delaware , Hawaii , Illinois , Maryland , Nevada , New Jersey , New Mexico , New York , Oregon , Utah , Vermont and Washington—issue a license if an applicant provides certain documentation , such as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or consular card and evidence of current residency in the state .
“ In 2019 , New Jersey , New York and Oregon became the most recent states to enact legislation extending drivers licenses and identification cards to those without proof of lawful presence , ” their report noted .

House and Senate Republicans have introduced legislation that would block certain federal funds from sanctuary states that allow illegal aliens to obtain driver’s licenses.
The Stop Greenlighting Driver Licenses for Illegal Immigrants Act would stop Justice Department (DOJ) grants that are a top source of federal criminal justice funding for states.
The legislation would target states that “defy federal immigration enforcement or that allow illegal aliens to get driver licenses without proof of lawful presence” and those that “prohibit or restrict a local or State government entity or official from collecting or sending to or receiving from the Department of Homeland Security immigration enforcement information.”
In the Senate, the legislation is being introduced by Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn and co-sponsored by Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.; Kevin Cramer, R-N.D.; Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va.; Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga.; Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, and Mike Rounds, R-S.D. Companion legislation is being introduced in the House by Colorado Rep. Ken Buck. His bill is co-sponsored by 21 other lawmakers.
Lawless sanctuary jurisdictions are dangerous and jeopardize our national security. Liberal politicians are allowing illegal aliens to obtain official state government-issued, taxpayer funded driver licenses when we can't even verify their true identities or intentions. pic.twitter.com/exIdHwp2gQ — Sen. Marsha Blackburn (@MarshaBlackburn) February 14, 2020
“Tennesseans know all too well what can happen when illegal immigrants are granted driver licenses,” Blackburn said in a statement. “While Tennessee and many other states prohibit driver licenses for illegal aliens, a growing number of states are moving in the opposite direction and unleashing dangerous open borders policies. Immigrants must follow the proper federal process and obtain citizenship or lawful status before obtaining a state driver license.”
“In America, no one is above the law,” she added.
Blackburn’s office estimated that states that issued licenses to illegal aliens received nearly $53 million that would be impacted by this new legislation during the 2019 fiscal year.
The NCSL reports that fifteen states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws to allow unauthorized immigrants to obtain drivers licenses. These states—California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Washington—issue a license if an applicant provides certain documentation, such as a foreign birth certificate, foreign passport, or consular card and evidence of current residency in the state.
“In 2019, New Jersey, New York and Oregon became the most recent states to enact legislation extending drivers licenses and identification cards to those without proof of lawful presence,” their report noted.


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--London Billboard Uses Image of President Trump and Melania to Encourage Women to Cheat on Their Husb

London Billboard Uses Image of President Trump and Melania to Encourage Women to Cheat on Their Husbands A billboard near the Westminster Bridge in central London advertising a website for women to find “ discreet affairs ” features President Donald Trump , First Lady Melania Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau .
The website , encouraging women to cheat on their spouses , shows Melania glancing at Trudeau while standing between him and her husband .
“ Married to one man , but fantasizing about others ?
” the tagline on the billboard reads .
“ You need to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Created by women .
For women .
To have discreet affairs.
” According to a user on Reddit , the ad has also been spotted on a Billboard in Melbourne earlier this month .
The ad is also launching in Spain , where it will be published in Spanish .
According to a study of 47,000 people by GlobalWebIndex , 30 % of Tinder users are married and 12 % are in a serious relationship .
Eveeda claims that they are simply catering to a market of cheaters that already exists .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ many anti-marriage and family ads to appear in the city in recent times .
Summit News reports that in November , there were also billboards encouraging white people to get sterilized .
“ The advertisement betrays a noticeable lack of ‘ diversity ’ as it only features caricatures of white people and no people of color , ” Summit noted .

A billboard near the Westminster Bridge in central London advertising a website for women to find “discreet affairs” features President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
The website, encouraging women to cheat on their spouses, shows Melania glancing at Trudeau while standing between him and her husband.
“Married to one man, but fantasizing about others?” the tagline on the billboard reads. “You need to try…EVEEDA.com.”
Eveeda’s slogan is “Created by women. For women. To have discreet affairs.”
According to a user on Reddit, the ad has also been spotted on a Billboard in Melbourne earlier this month.
The ad is also launching in Spain, where it will be published in Spanish.
According to a study of 47,000 people by GlobalWebIndex, 30% of Tinder users are married and 12% are in a serious relationship. Eveeda claims that they are simply catering to a market of cheaters that already exists.
This ad campaign is just one of many anti-marriage and family ads to appear in the city in recent times.
Summit News reports that in November, there were also billboards encouraging white people to get sterilized.
“The advertisement betrays a noticeable lack of ‘diversity’ as it only features caricatures of white people and no people of color,” Summit noted.


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--Corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson Schedules Tuesday Conference Call – Is Likely Another Attempt by Di

Corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson Schedules Tuesday Conference Call – Is Likely Another Attempt by Dirty DC Judge to Trash Trump Admin …MUST READ The writing is on the wall .
The corrupt Democrats , their corrupt mainstream media and corrupt attorneys from the criminal and fraudulent Mueller investigation are launching Round 3 of their corrupt and criminal destruction of the constitution and their next coup of the Trump Administration and the US government .
This too has been planned for some time .
The corrupt attorneys from the Mueller gang who were involved in the 5 am arrest of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brigade of FBI agents at gunpoint are now giving a final finger to Roger Stone , Attorney General Bill Barr , President Trump and all the good and patriotic citizens of this great nation .
Stone was arrested and brought to Washington D.C. where he was placed in the court of America ’ s most corrupt living judge , Obama appointee Judge Amy Berman Jackson .
The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on this corrupt and demonic person .
Judge Amy Berman Jackson , an Obama appointed corrupt liberal judge with an angry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Obama , continues to put her own distorted interpretation of US law ahead of the US Constitution .
In February 2019 we reported that the judge ’ s actions with Paul Manafort alone are ample cause for her to be removed or impeached .
It looked then like she would kill Manafort before being brought to justice !
In 2013 Judge Jackson rejected arguments from the Catholic Church that Obamacare ’ s requirements that employers provide cost free coverage to contraceptive services in spite of being contrary to their religious beliefs .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In 2017 Judge Jackson dismissed the wrongful death suit against Hillary Clinton filed by two of the families who lost loved ones in Benghazi .
The families argued that Clinton had done little to help their sons and then lied to cover it up .
Then on January 19 , 2018 , Paul Manafort ’ s case was reassigned to Judge Jackson on January 19th , a few weeks after being filed .
It is unknown why she was assigned to this case or by whom .
What is clear is that with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Deep State and the Mueller team certainly wanted Judge Jackson overseeing the Manafort case .
On January 3 , 2018 , we reported that Paul Manafort filed a suit against the “ Deep State ” DOJ ( Jeff Sessions ) , Assistant AG Rod Rosenstein and Corrupt Investigator Robert Mueller that should have shut down Mueller ’ s corrupt investigation !
We reported for months on the many criminal and corrupt actions taken by numerous parties related to the Mueller investigation .
Mueller never should have taken on the job in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He is best friends with fired leaker and former FBI Director James Comey .
He met with Comey shortly before Comey testified with Congress and strategized with him .
For this alone he should have recused himself .
The team Mueller built to attack President Trump , and have him removed , is comprised of all Deep State leftie attorneys and crooks .
Mueller ’ s record in the past is scattered with actions that let the Clintons off scot-free on numerous occasions when they should have been put in jail .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ illegally obtained documents related to the Trump transition team and these emails were protected under attorney-client privilege .
Mueller and his entire team should have resigned after this .
But perhaps one of the most damning aspects of the Mueller investigation was that it was not legal .
The corrupt Mueller investigation is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law .
It was a legal impossibility .
Mueller was being asked to do something that was manifestly unattainable .
Manafort sued the DOJ , Mueller and Rosenstein because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by US Law .
Manafort ’ s case argued in paragraph 33 of its filing that the special counsel put in place by crooked Rosenstein gave crooked and criminal Mueller powers that are not permitted by law .
Mueller was given the latitude to investigate whatever he wanted to and that is not permitted by the law .
Manafort ’ s filing paragraph 33 stated – Manafort ’ s case was solid but the judge was Obama ’ s corrupt liberal Judge Jackson .
On April 27 , 2018 , Judge Jackson dismissed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was not only wrong in her judgments , she was also overly abusive to Manafort .
She scolded Manafort and his team for a statement his spokesman issued maintaining his innocence and said the comments appeared to run afoul of the order she issued limiting public statements about the case by lawyers involved and by the defendants .
Of course she said nothing about the many leaks from the corrupt Mueller team .
In May 2018 Judge Jackson addressed another argument from the Manafort team and basically threw it out as well .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ clear that there ’ s no way Manafort was getting a fair trial with Judge Jackson overseeing his case . )
The corrupt and criminal Mueller team next worked with Obama Appointed Judge Amy Berman Jackson to place President Trump ’ s former Campaign Manager Paul Manafort in solitary confinement .
This was a conscious action to literally torture Manafort for working with Trump during the campaign .
Bernard Kerik at Newsmax wrote an excellent post on why Manafort was placed in solitary confinement .
According to Kerik – In a very small @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sits Bob Mueller ’ s big fish , Paul Manafort .
Mueller , the U.S. Department of Justice Special Counsel appointed to investigate any possible collusion between Russia and President Donald Trump ’ s campaign , has charged Manafort with multiple counts of conspiracy , money laundering , tax crimes , false statements , and anything else they can wad into a big ball and throw up against the wall to see what sticks .
After his arrest , Manafort was placed on house arrest on a $ 10 million-dollar bail , until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tampering and convinced U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson to revoke his bail , and remand him to jail pending trail .
To a casual observer , this would seem justified , however , to anyone that has been through it , or has witnessed the government ’ s selective and political prosecutions over the past few decades , they would tell you that it is all a part of a prosecutorial strategy .
Solitary confinement in prison lingo is also referred to as a special housing unit ( SHU ) , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and their individual cells are called a box , hole , or cage .
It ’ s basically a deathtrap .
A 12′ x 8′ solid steel or concrete box with a metal bed , stainless steel sink and toilet , and if you ’ re lucky , a small concrete or metal writing table and stool .
On the solid steel metal door , there may be a 4 x 24-inch window that gives the inmate a slight view of the outside corridor , that can be blackened out by the correction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Where prison itself demeans , degrades , and demoralizes a defendant , solitary confinement goes far beyond the normal deprivation of freedom , where the strain of isolation can cause a prisoner to suffer from manic depression , hopelessness and despair , paranoia , anxiety and , quite often experience hallucinations .
It can send suicidal prisoners over the edge , and incite juveniles to act out .
Pre-trial inmates can easily be manipulated into confessions and or guilty pleas , with promises or suggestions of being released from the box , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be freed from the mentally and emotionally breaking cell , including lying , and pleading guilty to something they never did .
Again later in 2018 , corrupt Judge Jackson – Friends of Trump go to solitary – Friends of Obama walk free !
Next somehow after being assigned to Paul Manfort ’ s case Judge Jackson was assigned to Obama White House counsel Greg Craig ’ s case related to the Mueller investigation .
The only individual related to Obama that was indicted in the investigation was then let go after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counts the Feds filed against him and then ultimately let him go .
After this Judge Jackson tossed a lawsuit over SPLC ’ s ‘ Hate Group ’ labels .
Next Judge Jackson was somehow assigned to Roger Stone ’ s case where he was indicted by the Mueller gang after being arrested a 5 in the morning in Florida by 20+ FBI Agents live on CNN !
Judge Jackson quickly put a gag order on Stone similar to what she did with Manafort .
Next when Stone argued that he committed no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ther Stone was accused of making a false statement related to the Russian collusion canard but Judge Jackson said his defense lawyers were not allowed to bring up the fact that the government was never able to show proof the Russians were behind the ‘ stolen ’ emails given to WikiLeaks .
This was central to Stone ’ s case .
If there was no evidence that Russia hacked the DNC then Stone could not have been prosecuted by Mueller .
Stone ’ s charge was lying to Congress but Congress lies to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recently Judge Jackson was magically assigned to most corrupt FBI Agent in US History , Peter Strzok ‘ s case where he is suing for wrongful termination .
He likely will win his case even if he ’ s behind bars for his criminal actions while working at the FBI .
Judge Amy Berman Jackson should be impeached and thrown in jail for their blatant abuse of the US judicial system in torturing and destroying the lives of those who worked with President Trump .
She should be held to the same criminal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s a banana republic judge at a time when Americans want justice !
Roger Stone never had a chance .
Mueller ’ s goons were willing to arrest him at 5am at gun point for allegedly lying to Congress ( something that Adam Schiff and many Democrat politicians do every day ) .
Last week , first Aaron Zelinsky abruptly resigned , then Jonathan Kravis resigned , according to a court filing in Washington federal court .
Then it was reported that a third Mueller prosecutor Adam Jed announced he will withdraw from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a fourth and final prosecutor on Roger Stone ’ s case was OUT !
Federal Prosecutors on Monday recommended Trump confidante Roger Stone serve 7-9 years in prison for process crimes during the Mueller witch hunt .
Roger Stone is a non-violent 67-year-old man who was caught up in Mueller ’ s abusive witch hunt .
In a rare move , the Department of Justice backed down from its abusive sentencing recommendation for Roger Stone .
All four prosecutors signed Roger Stone ’ s sentencing memo seeking an excessive prison term of 7 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now off the case .
The Department of Justice said it was “ shocked ” at the excessive prison term being sought by Mueller ’ s prosecutors because it wasn ’ t what the DOJ was initially briefed on .
“ The Department was shocked to see the sentencing recommendation in the filing in the Stone case last night , ” the official told Fox News .
“ The sentencing recommendation was not what had been briefed to the Department.
” President Trump on Tuesday blasted the sentencing recommendation for Roger Stone as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Trump should pardon Roger Stone and everyone else caught up in Mueller ’ s witch hunt .
Of course this was all a set up !
According to Law and Order – If Mueller attorneys , Judge Amy Berman Jackson and Preet Bharara are involved , then this is going to be another fraudulent sham from the the most corrupt judge in the country .
Let ’ s hope these goons lose in the next election 100,000,000 to 1 .

The writing is on the wall.
The corrupt Democrats, their corrupt mainstream media and corrupt attorneys from the criminal and fraudulent Mueller investigation are launching Round 3 of their corrupt and criminal destruction of the constitution and their next coup of the Trump Administration and the US government.
This too has been planned for some time.
The corrupt attorneys from the Mueller gang who were involved in the 5 am arrest of Roger Stone in his home by a brigade of FBI agents at gunpoint are now giving a final finger to Roger Stone, Attorney General Bill Barr, President Trump and all the good and patriotic citizens of this great nation.
Stone was arrested and brought to Washington D.C. where he was placed in the court of America’s most corrupt living judge, Obama appointee Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson
On Tuesday President Trump TORCHED demon Judge Amy Berman Jackson!
Is this the Judge that put Paul Manafort in SOLITARY CONFINEMENT, something that not even mobster Al Capone had to endure? How did she treat Crooked Hillary Clinton? Just asking! https://t.co/Fe7XkepJNN — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 12, 2020
The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on this corrupt and demonic person. Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointed corrupt liberal judge with an angry disposition towards Americans who think differently than Obama, continues to put her own distorted interpretation of US law ahead of the US Constitution.
In February 2019 we reported that the judge’s actions with Paul Manafort alone are ample cause for her to be removed or impeached. It looked then like she would kill Manafort before being brought to justice!
In 2013 Judge Jackson rejected arguments from the Catholic Church that Obamacare’s requirements that employers provide cost free coverage to contraceptive services in spite of being contrary to their religious beliefs. This was overturned by the Supreme Court.
In 2017 Judge Jackson dismissed the wrongful death suit against Hillary Clinton filed by two of the families who lost loved ones in Benghazi. The families argued that Clinton had done little to help their sons and then lied to cover it up.
Then on January 19, 2018, Paul Manafort’s case was reassigned to Judge Jackson on January 19th, a few weeks after being filed.
It is unknown why she was assigned to this case or by whom. What is clear is that with her atrocious and slanted record to date, the Deep State and the Mueller team certainly wanted Judge Jackson overseeing the Manafort case.
On January 3, 2018, we reported that Paul Manafort filed a suit against the “Deep State” DOJ (Jeff Sessions), Assistant AG Rod Rosenstein and Corrupt Investigator Robert Mueller that should have shut down Mueller’s corrupt investigation!
We reported for months on the many criminal and corrupt actions taken by numerous parties related to the Mueller investigation. Mueller never should have taken on the job in the first place due to numerous conflicts. He is best friends with fired leaker and former FBI Director James Comey. He met with Comey shortly before Comey testified with Congress and strategized with him. For this alone he should have recused himself. The team Mueller built to attack President Trump, and have him removed, is comprised of all Deep State leftie attorneys and crooks. Mueller’s record in the past is scattered with actions that let the Clintons off scot-free on numerous occasions when they should have been put in jail.
We know that Mueller’s team illegally obtained documents related to the Trump transition team and these emails were protected under attorney-client privilege. Mueller and his entire team should have resigned after this.
But perhaps one of the most damning aspects of the Mueller investigation was that it was not legal. The corrupt Mueller investigation is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It was a legal impossibility. Mueller was being asked to do something that was manifestly unattainable.
Manafort sued the DOJ, Mueller and Rosenstein because what they are doing was not supported by US Law.
Manafort’s case argued in paragraph 33 of its filing that the special counsel put in place by crooked Rosenstein gave crooked and criminal Mueller powers that are not permitted by law. Mueller was given the latitude to investigate whatever he wanted to and that is not permitted by the law. Manafort’s filing paragraph 33 stated –
But paragraph (b)(ii) of the Appointment Order purports to grant Mr. Mueller further authority to investigate and prosecute “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation.” That grant of authority is not authorized by DOJ’s special counsel regulations. It is not a “specific factual statement of the matter to be investigated.” Nor is it an ancillary power to address efforts to impede or obstruct investigation under 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
Manafort’s case was solid but the judge was Obama’s corrupt liberal Judge Jackson. On April 27, 2018, Judge Jackson dismissed Manafort’s plea.
Judge Jackson was not only wrong in her judgments, she was also overly abusive to Manafort. She scolded Manafort and his team for a statement his spokesman issued maintaining his innocence and said the comments appeared to run afoul of the order she issued limiting public statements about the case by lawyers involved and by the defendants. Of course she said nothing about the many leaks from the corrupt Mueller team.
In May 2018 Judge Jackson addressed another argument from the Manafort team and basically threw it out as well. (Back then it was more than clear that there’s no way Manafort was getting a fair trial with Judge Jackson overseeing his case.)
Manafort’s legal team had argued in a Washington, D.C., court that he was being charged twice for the same offense of lying to federal officials. Manafort maintained that the stacking up charges could negatively influence a jury against him, The Associated Press reported. U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, however, said in a ruling Friday that any harm or prejudice Manafort could face would be handled by giving the jury “proper” instructions, according to the AP. The judge dismissed the motion from Manafort without prejudice, meaning he can revisit it after his trial in the case, which is scheduled for September, the AP noted.
The corrupt and criminal Mueller team next worked with Obama Appointed Judge Amy Berman Jackson to place President Trump’s former Campaign Manager Paul Manafort in solitary confinement.
This was a conscious action to literally torture Manafort for working with Trump during the campaign.
Bernard Kerik at Newsmax wrote an excellent post on why Manafort was placed in solitary confinement. According to Kerik –
In a very small regional jail in Warsaw, Virginia, sits Bob Mueller’s big fish, Paul Manafort. Mueller, the U.S. Department of Justice Special Counsel appointed to investigate any possible collusion between Russia and President Donald Trump’s campaign, has charged Manafort with multiple counts of conspiracy, money laundering, tax crimes, false statements, and anything else they can wad into a big ball and throw up against the wall to see what sticks. After his arrest, Manafort was placed on house arrest on a $10 million-dollar bail, until the government recently accused him of witness tampering and convinced U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson to revoke his bail, and remand him to jail pending trail. To a casual observer, this would seem justified, however, to anyone that has been through it, or has witnessed the government’s selective and political prosecutions over the past few decades, they would tell you that it is all a part of a prosecutorial strategy. Solitary confinement in prison lingo is also referred to as a special housing unit (SHU), or punitive segregation unit (PSU), and their individual cells are called a box, hole, or cage. It’s basically a deathtrap. A 12′ x 8′ solid steel or concrete box with a metal bed, stainless steel sink and toilet, and if you’re lucky, a small concrete or metal writing table and stool. On the solid steel metal door, there may be a 4 x 24-inch window that gives the inmate a slight view of the outside corridor, that can be blackened out by the correction staff at a moment’s notice. Kerik continued – Where prison itself demeans, degrades, and demoralizes a defendant, solitary confinement goes far beyond the normal deprivation of freedom, where the strain of isolation can cause a prisoner to suffer from manic depression, hopelessness and despair, paranoia, anxiety and, quite often experience hallucinations. It can send suicidal prisoners over the edge, and incite juveniles to act out. Pre-trial inmates can easily be manipulated into confessions and or guilty pleas, with promises or suggestions of being released from the box, and quite often they will do anything to be freed from the mentally and emotionally breaking cell, including lying, and pleading guilty to something they never did.
Again later in 2018, corrupt Judge Jackson –
…denied a request by President Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort to suppress evidence seized by the FBI from his home as part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s ongoing probe into whether Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign colluded with Russia.
Manafort’s lawyers had sought to limit the scope of evidence that prosecutors can rely on for his upcoming September trial in Washington, D.C., claiming that the search warrant was overly broad and unconstitutional. “Given the nature of the investigation, the warrant was not too broad in scope,” wrote Judge Amy Berman Jackson for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in her ruling.
Friends of Trump go to solitary – Friends of Obama walk free!
Next somehow after being assigned to Paul Manfort’s case Judge Jackson was assigned to Obama White House counsel Greg Craig’s case related to the Mueller investigation. The only individual related to Obama that was indicted in the investigation was then let go after Judge Jackson dismissed one of the two counts the Feds filed against him and then ultimately let him go.
After this Judge Jackson tossed a lawsuit over SPLC’s ‘Hate Group’ labels.
Next Judge Jackson was somehow assigned to Roger Stone’s case where he was indicted by the Mueller gang after being arrested a 5 in the morning in Florida by 20+ FBI Agents live on CNN!
Judge Jackson quickly put a gag order on Stone similar to what she did with Manafort. Next when Stone argued that he committed no crime related to knowing that WikiLinks because ther
Stone was accused of making a false statement related to the Russian collusion canard but Judge Jackson said his defense lawyers were not allowed to bring up the fact that the government was never able to show proof the Russians were behind the ‘stolen’ emails given to WikiLeaks. This was central to Stone’s case. If there was no evidence that Russia hacked the DNC then Stone could not have been prosecuted by Mueller.
Stone’s charge was lying to Congress but Congress lies to Americans every day with immunity.
In November Tucker Carlson discussed the corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
Most recently Judge Jackson was magically assigned to most corrupt FBI Agent in US History, Peter Strzok‘s case where he is suing for wrongful termination. He likely will win his case even if he’s behind bars for his criminal actions while working at the FBI.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson should be impeached and thrown in jail for their blatant abuse of the US judicial system in torturing and destroying the lives of those who worked with President Trump. She should be held to the same criminal treatment that she promotes. She’s a banana republic judge at a time when Americans want justice!
Mueller Gang Attorneys
Roger Stone never had a chance. Mueller’s goons were willing to arrest him at 5am at gun point for allegedly lying to Congress (something that Adam Schiff and many Democrat politicians do every day).
Last week, first Aaron Zelinsky abruptly resigned, then Jonathan Kravis resigned, according to a court filing in Washington federal court. Then it was reported that a third Mueller prosecutor Adam Jed announced he will withdraw from the Roger Stone case. Finally, a fourth and final prosecutor on Roger Stone’s case was OUT!
Federal Prosecutors on Monday recommended Trump confidante Roger Stone serve 7-9 years in prison for process crimes during the Mueller witch hunt.
Roger Stone is a non-violent 67-year-old man who was caught up in Weissmann’s Mueller’s abusive witch hunt.
In a rare move, the Department of Justice backed down from its abusive sentencing recommendation for Roger Stone.
All four prosecutors signed Roger Stone’s sentencing memo seeking an excessive prison term of 7 to 9 years and all four are now off the case.
CNBC reported:
Four federal prosecutors dramatically quit the criminal case against Republican operative Roger Stone as the Department of Justice reduced their recommendation that a judge sentence the longtime ally of President Donald Trump to up to nine years in prison. Jonathan Kravis, who delivered the closing argument at Stone’s trial last fall, resigned as an assistant U.S. Attorney, according to a court filing in Washington federal court. Kravis, who did not give a reason in the filing, will no longer work as a prosecutor for the federal government. The other three prosecutors, Aaron Zelinsky, Adam Jed and Michael Marando, also withdrew from Stone’s case, according to their own separate filings, which did not explain their decision. But those three all will continue working for the federal government.
The Department of Justice said it was “shocked” at the excessive prison term being sought by Mueller’s prosecutors because it wasn’t what the DOJ was initially briefed on.
“The Department was shocked to see the sentencing recommendation in the filing in the Stone case last night,” the official told Fox News. “The sentencing recommendation was not what had been briefed to the Department.”
President Trump on Tuesday blasted the sentencing recommendation for Roger Stone as an “insult to our country!”
Trump should pardon Roger Stone and everyone else caught up in Weissmann’s Mueller’s witch hunt.
Of course this was all a set up!
According to Law and Order –
The judge in the Roger Stone criminal wants to speak to both sides in a conference call scheduled for Tuesday. The conference call was scheduled on Sunday. The reason behind this is unclear from the records, but um, there’s been a lot of activity in the case as of late. Prosecutors originally recommended seven-to-nine years in prison for Stone, a 67-year-old Trump campaign surrogate convicted of witness tampering, lying to Congress, and obstruction. President Donald Trump complained about it on Twitter. The Department of Justice, as an institution, walked back the sentencing recommendation. The prosecutors on the case withdrew. It remains to be seen what U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson wants to discuss. Preet Bharara, a former U.S. Attorney who served in the Obama administration and was famously fired by Trump, suggested that the court will look into why the prosecutors left.
If Mueller attorneys, Judge Amy Berman Jackson and Preet Bharara are involved, then this is going to be another fraudulent sham from the the most corrupt judge in the country.
Let’s hope these goons lose in the next election 100,000,000 to 1.


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--DISCOVERED: Roger Stone Lead Juror, Tomeka Hart, Posted a Second Article Bashing Roger Stone in Janu

DISCOVERED: Roger Stone Lead Juror, Tomeka Hart, Posted a Second Article Bashing Roger Stone in January 2019 — Lied to the Court

DISCOVERED : Roger Stone Lead Juror , Tomeka Hart , Posted a Second Article Bashing Roger Stone in January 2019 — Lied to the Court Juror Tomeka Hart , on the Roger Stone case , is a radical Democrat with a long list of Democrat connections .
She now may be the reason that Roger Stone ’ s attorneys may be calling for a new trial .
Tomeka posted several attacks on President Trump , including conspiracy theories about Trump and Russia .
Mike Cernovich tweeted many conflicts juror Hart had in the Stone case : Yaacov Apelbaum has some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hart currently works for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation : She ran for office before and in January 2019 , when she retweeted a nasty tweet about Roger Stone : She also was all-in on the Russia collusion hoax : She also has numerous social media posts that are anti-President Trump : Hart should never have been involved in the Roger Stone case , along with Judge Amy Berman Jackson .
There was no way Roger Stone was going to get a fair trial for the bogus crimes he was accused of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ jury selection that she had no biases against Roger Stone and that she ‘ hardly paid attention ’ to the Russia investigation , but she specifically attacked Stone on Twitter shortly after he was arrested .
And now we have another article , from NPR , posted by Tomeka Hart in January 2019 attacking Roger Stone .
This woman lied to the court and never should have been seated on the jury against Roger Stone .
This entire lynching of Roger Stone is a travesty of justice .

Juror Tomeka Hart, on the Roger Stone case, is a radical Democrat with a long list of Democrat connections. She now may be the reason that Roger Stone’s attorneys may be calling for a new trial.
Tomeka posted several attacks on President Trump, including conspiracy theories about Trump and Russia.
Mike Cernovich tweeted many conflicts juror Hart had in the Stone case:
The author of this article was a juror on the Roger Stone case. She has an active social media profile. How in the F-CK did a judge approve this far left wing activist as a fair and impartial juror? https://t.co/4JCbz7hmxb pic.twitter.com/AYWZ5AEmVS — Cernovich (@Cernovich) February 13, 2020
Juror Hart with former Democrat Chair, Donna Brazile:
Yaacov Apelbaum has some additional information on juror Hart today. Hart currently works for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation:
She ran for office before and in January 2019, when she retweeted a nasty tweet about Roger Stone:
She also was all-in on the Russia collusion hoax:
She also has numerous social media posts that are anti-President Trump:
Hart should never have been involved in the Roger Stone case, along with Judge Amy Berman Jackson. There was no way Roger Stone was going to get a fair trial for the bogus crimes he was accused of committing.
Tomeka Hart testified during the jury selection that she had no biases against Roger Stone and that she ‘hardly paid attention’ to the Russia investigation, but she specifically attacked Stone on Twitter shortly after he was arrested.
BREAKING: Here is the Roger Stone jury foreman retweeting a blatantly anti-Roger Stone tweet from the time of his arrest The fact that she mentioned him by name shows her anti-Trump bias extended to Stone, mocked his supporters, and directly contradicts her impartiality pic.twitter.com/L6MzkbrB9C — Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) February 13, 2020
And now we have another article, from NPR, posted by Tomeka Hart in January 2019 attacking Roger Stone.
This woman lied to the court and never should have been seated on the jury against Roger Stone.
This entire lynching of Roger Stone is a travesty of justice.


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--Virginia Governor Northam’s Assault Weapons Ban Fails After Several Democrats Vote with Senate Repub

Virginia Governor Northam’s Assault Weapons Ban Fails After Several Democrats Vote with Senate Republicans

Virginia Governor Northam ’ s Assault Weapons Ban Fails After Several Democrats Vote with Senate Republicans Tens of thousands of Second Amendment supporters attended a pro-gun rally in Richmond , Virginia in January .
The Democrats in Virginia , after millions of Bloomberg donations flipped the House/Senate to blue , are pushing for gun control legislation , and KKK-Blackface Governor Ralph Northam declared a state of emergency to ban guns at Monday ’ s rally , Jan. 20 , 2020 .
Northam banned all weapons from inside the Capitol Square on Jan. 20 , 2020 , citing “ credible and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elaborate .
The rally has been peaceful and a law enforcement source tells The Gateway Pundit that an estimated 25,000 people attended that Monday rally .
Sheriffs at the pro-gun rally were seen holding a sign that read , “ We Support the Second Amendment.
” Today several Virginia senate Democrats joined Republicans to block Governor Northam ’ s ban on assault weapons in the state .
Virginia Gov .
Ralph Northam ’ s push to ban the sale of assault weapons failed on Monday after some of his fellow Democrats balked at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bill for the year and ask the state crime commission to study the issue , an outcome that drew cheers from a committee room packed with gun advocates .
Four moderate Democrats joined Republicans in Monday ’ s committee vote , rejecting legislation that would have prohibited the sale of certain semiautomatic firearms , including popular AR-15 style rifles , and banned the possession of magazines that hold more than 12 rounds .

Tens of thousands of Second Amendment supporters attended a pro-gun rally in Richmond, Virginia in January.
The Democrats in Virginia, after millions of Bloomberg donations flipped the House/Senate to blue, are pushing for gun control legislation, and KKK-Blackface Governor Ralph Northam declared a state of emergency to ban guns at Monday’s rally, Jan. 20, 2020.
Northam banned all weapons from inside the Capitol Square on Jan. 20, 2020, citing “credible and serious threats,” but did not elaborate.
The rally has been peaceful and a law enforcement source tells The Gateway Pundit that an estimated 25,000 people attended that Monday rally.
Sheriffs at the pro-gun rally were seen holding a sign that read, “We Support the Second Amendment.”
Via Jack Posobiec.
Virginia Sheriffs: We Support the Second Amendment #VirginiaRally pic.twitter.com/uaDpBvVWdT — Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) January 20, 2020
Today several Virginia senate Democrats joined Republicans to block Governor Northam’s ban on assault weapons in the state.
The AP reported:


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--East Coast Elitist Mike Bloomberg: “Anyone in This Room Can Be a Farmer” – You Need “Gray Matter” to

East Coast Elitist Mike Bloomberg: “Anyone in This Room Can Be a Farmer” – You Need “Gray Matter” to be in Information Economy (VIDEO)

East Coast Elitist Mike Bloomberg : “ Anyone in This Room Can Be a Farmer ” – You Need “ Gray Matter ” to be in Information Economy ( VIDEO ) New York elitist Mike Bloomberg is in hot water again .
The Democrat hopeful had a rough weekend after several of his offensive comments surfaced online .
On Sunday night The Gateway Pundit reported on Bloomberg ’ s explanation on how it will be necessary to deny elderly health care in order to save money .
And then another clip surfaced from 2016 of Bloomberg attacking ignorant farmers for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ I could teach anybody in this room to be a farmer .
It ’ s a process here , you dig a hole , you put a seed in , you put dirt on , add water , up comes the corn .
You can learn that .
Then you have 300 years of the industrial society… Now comes the information economy .
And the information economy is fundamentally different , because it ’ s built around replacing people with technology and the skill sets you have to learn are how to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whole degree level different , you need to have different skill set , you have to have a lot more gray matter .
”

New York elitist Mike Bloomberg is in hot water again.
The Democrat hopeful had a rough weekend after several of his offensive comments surfaced online.
On Sunday night The Gateway Pundit reported on Bloomberg’s explanation on how it will be necessary to deny elderly health care in order to save money.
And then another clip surfaced from 2016 of Bloomberg attacking ignorant farmers for lacking gray matter.
Mike Bloomberg: “I could teach anybody in this room to be a farmer. It’s a process here, you dig a hole, you put a seed in, you put dirt on, add water, up comes the corn. You can learn that. Then you have 300 years of the industrial society… Now comes the information economy. And the information economy is fundamentally different, because it’s built around replacing people with technology and the skill sets you have to learn are how to think and analyze and that is a whole degree level different, you need to have different skill set, you have to have a lot more gray matter.”
Well, the hard-working American farmers and machinists mocked by diminutive billionaire #MichaelBloomberg for being bereft of “grey matter” may have a few thoughts walking into the voting booth this November. #MiniMike pic.twitter.com/ykINEPdx1E — James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) February 17, 2020


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--EXCLUSIVE: ’60 Minutes’ Pushes Complete BS on the American Public Again in a Shoddy Crowdstrike Segm

EXCLUSIVE: ’60 Minutes’ Pushes Complete BS on the American Public Again in a Shoddy Crowdstrike Segment While Smearing President Trump and The Gateway Pundit

EXCLUSIVE : ’ 60 Minutes ’ Pushes Complete BS on the American Public Again in a Shoddy Crowdstrike Segment While Smearing President Trump and The Gateway Pundit Last night 60 Minutes attacked President Donald Trump and The Gateway Pundit in another shoddy hit piece .
The news magazine claimed Crowdstrike was correct in assessing that the DNC was hacked by Russians in 2016 .
But all they offer as proof is hearsay and weak arguments .
60 Minutes and Crowdstrike are dead wrong AND WE HAVE THE PROOF .
For years now the FBI and Mueller investigation claimed that Russia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the 2016 election .
This is central to the Russia-Collusion narrative .
But the actual evidence shows the Russia collusion scam is one of the biggest lies pushed on the American people in US history .
Last night 60 Minutes had a report authored by Scott Pelley , regarding Crowdstrike ’ s claims that Russia hacked the DNC in 2016 before the Podesta emails were published by Wikileaks .
In their piece the far left media outlet suggested The Gateway Pundit ( TGP ) pushes conspiracy theories and flashed an image of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a bold move considering the topic of the 60 Minutes segment .
60 Minutes insinuated that what TGP posted in 2017 that was conspiratorial , but our 2017 post shared a chart that was also published by WikiLeaks at that time .
In 2017 we correctly reported that the website Cyber Berkut had published links and a chart showing connections between the Ukrainian officials and the Clintons : Of course 60 Minutes can not point to any conspiracy with our 2017 post linked to above .
We took the information directly from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on to push the discredited Trump-Russia conspiracy .
The segment is the first report that we are aware of where the media actually addresses the fact that the favor President Trump asked of the Ukraine in a recent call was related to Crowdstrike .
President Trump only discussed the Bidens on his call with Ukrainian President Zelensky after they were brought up by the Ukrainian President .
60 Minutes says , “ Mr .
Trump asked for [ Crowdstrike ] even before his request that Ukraine also investigate the son of Vice President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ call transcript you can see that the President ’ s request was regarding Crowdstrike and the Bidens only came up after their corrupt actions were noted by the Ukrainian leader .
This is a major misrepresentation by Scott Pelley .
Pelley , from 60 Minutes , uses former anti-Trump Ambassador Bill Taylor , from the sham impeachment fiasco , as his expert witness on the Ukraine .
Taylor claims he knows of no connection between Crowdstrike and the Ukraine .
Pelley then shared the following in his report [ emphasis added ] : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as an investigator of the DNC hack for CrowdStrike , a leading cyber security company hired by the Democrats .
He told us the FBI didn ’ t physically examine the DNC servers because CrowdStrike gave the bureau copies of the data from the servers .
“ If there is a server or a computer system of any kind that ’ s involved in the incident you can take an exact bit for bit digital copy of what ’ s on that system .
Now that digital copy is just as good as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
“ As far as you know , the FBI got what it needed and what it wanted ?
” Pelley asked Johnston .
“ Exactly and evidence of that is you don ’ t hear the FBI complaining , ” Johnston said .
He ’ s right .
A former senior government official , familiar with the investigation , told us the FBI would have preferred to work alongside CrowdStrike ’ s investigators , but the Democratic National Committee decided to give the bureau digital copies of its servers instead .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ acceptable , ” in fact even typical in FBI investigations .
How pathetic is 60 Minutes in spreading these ridiculous Crowdstrike statements ?
We know that Crowdstike is related to the Ukraine and this is through Ukrainian billionaire and longtime contributor to the Clinton Foundation Victor Pinchuk .
We also know Crowdstrike is connected to James Clapper and the Atlantic Group : We know that in July 2015 Google invested $ 100 million into Crowdstrike – There are many holes with the ‘ Russia hacked the DNC emails ’ claim , much of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ TGP .
Several individuals previously shared they have sources who claim that the DNC servers were never examined by Crowdstrike : It was also uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “ draft reports ” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took their word for it .
It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike ’ s reports : Former NSA whistleblower Bill Binney previously reported he has evidence the DNC emails @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on to a flashdrive or something similar .
Binney has proof for his assertion but Crowdstrike and the DNC to date have provided no support that it was Russia who hacked the DNC .
Binney also claims that the Mueller gang wouldn ’ t even look at his data because they knew it would show something different than what they presented in their final bogus report ( i.e .
Mueller ’ s dossier as referred to by Devin Nunes ) .
Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum says the 60 Minutes and Crowdstrike claims are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FBI any data it was drive images ( we don ’ t even know which ones ) .
This did not include memory dumps , network pocket captures , firewall activity , etc .
This type of data is crucial and should have been examined in real-time by the FBI .
If indeed any drive images were given to the FBI , these would have been contaminated because they continued to use these drives for weeks after the alleged hack .
Crowd Strike was completely wrong ( most likely intentionally ) about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And we know for a fact that they used the same forensic techniques to reach that conclusion as they did on the DNC hack .
Apelbaum posted a report in January 2019 , with information basically proving that the DNC was not hacked by the Russians .
Apelbaum ’ s first argument is this – According to the WaPo ( using CrowdStrike , DOJ , and their other usual hush-hush government sources in the know ) , the attack was perpetrated by a Russian unit lead by Lieutenant Captain Nikolay Kozachek who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used it to get into the network and install keystroke loggers on several PCs .
This allowed them to see what the employees were typing and take screenshots of the employees ’ computer .
This is pretty detailed information , but if this was the case , then how did the DOJ learn all of these ‘ details ’ and use them in the indictments without the FBI ever forensically evaluating the DNC/HRC computers ?
And since when does the DOJ , an organization that only speaks the language of indictments use hearsay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Matt Tait ( a former GCHQ collector and a connoisseur of all things related to Russian collusion ) , CrowdStrike , or any other evidence lacking chain of custody certification as a primary source for prosecution ?
A second point by Apelbaum is – Above are pictures of the individuals the FBI says were working on both the DNC/HRC email hacking and the Olympic doping projects .
The same guys were working on both projects which is all but impossible .
( Do we really know if they ’ re even real or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Mueller gang ’ s assertion that the ‘ hacker ’ named Guccifer 2.0 was a Russian – After providing a couple more examples of why the Russian story doesn ’ t stick , Apelbaum closes with this –

Last night 60 Minutes attacked President Donald Trump and The Gateway Pundit in another shoddy hit piece.
The news magazine claimed Crowdstrike was correct in assessing that the DNC was hacked by Russians in 2016. But all they offer as proof is hearsay and weak arguments.
60 Minutes and Crowdstrike are dead wrong AND WE HAVE THE PROOF.
For years now the FBI and Mueller investigation claimed that Russia hacked the DNC during the lead up to the 2016 election. This is central to the Russia-Collusion narrative. But the actual evidence shows the Russia collusion scam is one of the biggest lies pushed on the American people in US history.
60 Minutes Yesterday
Last night 60 Minutes had a report authored by Scott Pelley, regarding Crowdstrike’s claims that Russia hacked the DNC in 2016 before the Podesta emails were published by Wikileaks. In their piece the far left media outlet suggested The Gateway Pundit (TGP) pushes conspiracy theories and flashed an image of a 2017 TGP report.
This was a bold move considering the topic of the 60 Minutes segment. 60 Minutes insinuated that what TGP posted in 2017 that was conspiratorial, but our 2017 post shared a chart that was also published by WikiLeaks at that time.
In 2017 we correctly reported that the website Cyber Berkut had published links and a chart showing connections between the Ukrainian officials and the Clintons:
Tonight in one of their shoddy @RealDonaldTrump hit pieces @60Minutes flashed a shot of a @GatewayPundit post from 2017 they claimed was a conspiracy… @Wikileaks also posted same graphic at the time. So what was the conspiracy guys? Where's your proof? https://t.co/F8B1Lup5Nt pic.twitter.com/zEM25EsR2i — The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) February 17, 2020
Of course 60 Minutes cannot point to any conspiracy with our 2017 post linked to above. We took the information directly from the Cyber Berkut webpage.
60 Minutes went on to push the discredited Trump-Russia conspiracy.
The segment is the first report that we are aware of where the media actually addresses the fact that the favor President Trump asked of the Ukraine in a recent call was related to Crowdstrike. President Trump only discussed the Bidens on his call with Ukrainian President Zelensky after they were brought up by the Ukrainian President. 60 Minutes says, “Mr. Trump asked for [Crowdstrike] even before his request that Ukraine also investigate the son of Vice President Biden.”
Clearly if you read the call transcript you can see that the President’s request was regarding Crowdstrike and the Bidens only came up after their corrupt actions were noted by the Ukrainian leader.
This is a major misrepresentation by Scott Pelley.
Pelley, from 60 Minutes, uses former anti-Trump Ambassador Bill Taylor, from the sham impeachment fiasco, as his expert witness on the Ukraine. Taylor claims he knows of no connection between Crowdstrike and the Ukraine.
Pelley then shared the following in his report [emphasis added]:
Robert Johnston dealt directly with the FBI as an investigator of the DNC hack for CrowdStrike, a leading cyber security company hired by the Democrats. He told us the FBI didn’t physically examine the DNC servers because CrowdStrike gave the bureau copies of the data from the servers. “If there is a server or a computer system of any kind that’s involved in the incident you can take an exact bit for bit digital copy of what’s on that system. Now that digital copy is just as good as having the real thing,” Johnston said. “As far as you know, the FBI got what it needed and what it wanted?” Pelley asked Johnston. “Exactly and evidence of that is you don’t hear the FBI complaining,” Johnston said. He’s right. A former senior government official, familiar with the investigation, told us the FBI would have preferred to work alongside CrowdStrike’s investigators, but the Democratic National Committee decided to give the bureau digital copies of its servers instead. The official told us this was “acceptable,” in fact even typical in FBI investigations.
What shameless liars!
How pathetic is 60 Minutes in spreading these ridiculous Crowdstrike statements?
Who Is Crowdstrike?
We know that Crowdstike is related to the Ukraine and this is through Ukrainian billionaire and longtime contributor to the Clinton Foundation Victor Pinchuk. We also know Crowdstrike is connected to James Clapper and the Atlantic Group:
Pinchuk serves on the International Advisory Board of a Washington-based think tank called the Atlantic Council. This group is “connected to Ukrainian interests through its “Ukraine in Europe Initiative,” which is designed to galvanize international support for an independent Ukraine within secure borders whose people will determine their own future.” Also serving on the International Advisory Board of the Atlantic Council is James Clapper, who served as Obama’s Director of National Intelligence. Funnily enough, Bongino discovered that the Chief Technology Officer of “the only company that investigated the hacking of the DNC’s servers and quickly determined it was the Russians, is a nonresident senior fellow in cybersecurity” at the Atlantic Council. His name is Dmitri Alperovitch (owner of CrowdStrike).”
We know that in July 2015 Google invested $100 million into Crowdstrike –
Google Capital, the two-year-old growth equity arm of search giant Google (GOOG), announced its first security investment on Monday morning. The fund has pumped $100 million into cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike. It was joined by cloud computing company Rackspace (RAX), which is a customer, and the firm’s existing investors Accel and Warburg Pincus. The new infusion represents a Series C round for the Irvine, Calif.-based company, bringing its total funding raised to date to $156 million.
Holes in Crowdstike’s Claims –
There are many holes with the ‘Russia hacked the DNC emails’ claim, much of what has already been posted here at TGP.
Several individuals previously shared they have sources who claim that the DNC servers were never examined by Crowdstrike:
After speaking w/ my @FBI sources & a @nytimes reporter with direct knowledge of the handling of the @DNC server it's true – there was no direct examination or physically custody of the DNC server – an "image" (i.e. copy) of the server was examined only: https://t.co/yDJKCYmUQC — Tony Shaffer (@T_S_P_O_O_K_Y) May 12, 2019
It was also uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took their word for it. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports:
The DNC's lawyer provided the Crowdstrike reports to the Govt. He said the redacted parts weren't relevant to the investigation. The FBI never looked into it. Full DOJ response here: https://t.co/4LdwvWZzef pic.twitter.com/81cQTgfk7V — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) June 15, 2019
Former NSA whistleblower Bill Binney previously reported he has evidence the DNC emails were not hacked but copied most likely on to a flashdrive or something similar.
NSA Whistleblower and longtime intelligence analyst Bill Binney on continuation of #RussiaGate fever: "The problem with the Mueller Report & the Rosenstein indictment is it's based on lies." FULL INTERVIEW: https://t.co/qiTOpvNd2q pic.twitter.com/tDSSSg0j0H — Status Coup News (@StatusCoup) June 3, 2019
(Binney is brilliant. See the documentary on Binney entitled: “A Good American” – it will astound you.)
Binney has proof for his assertion but Crowdstrike and the DNC to date have provided no support that it was Russia who hacked the DNC.
Binney also claims that the Mueller gang wouldn’t even look at his data because they knew it would show something different than what they presented in their final bogus report (i.e. Mueller’s dossier as referred to by Devin Nunes).
Apelbaum’s Argument
Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum says the 60 Minutes and Crowdstrike claims are completely false:
If Crowdstrike gave the FBI any data it was drive images (we don’t even know which ones). This did not include memory dumps, network pocket captures, firewall activity, etc. This type of data is crucial and should have been examined in real-time by the FBI. If indeed any drive images were given to the FBI, these would have been contaminated because they continued to use these drives for weeks after the alleged hack. Crowd Strike was completely wrong (most likely intentionally) about the Russian hack of the Ukrainian Artillery allegation. And we know for a fact that they used the same forensic techniques to reach that conclusion as they did on the DNC hack.
Apelbaum posted a report in January 2019, with information basically proving that the DNC was not hacked by the Russians. Apelbaum’s first argument is this –
According to the WaPo (using CrowdStrike, DOJ, and their other usual hush-hush government sources in the know), the attack was perpetrated by a Russian unit lead by Lieutenant Captain Nikolay Kozachek who allegedly crafted a malware called X-Agent and used it to get into the network and install keystroke loggers on several PCs. This allowed them to see what the employees were typing and take screenshots of the employees’ computer. This is pretty detailed information, but if this was the case, then how did the DOJ learn all of these ‘details’ and use them in the indictments without the FBI ever forensically evaluating the DNC/HRC computers? And since when does the DOJ, an organization that only speaks the language of indictments use hearsay and 3rd parties like the British national Matt Tait (a former GCHQ collector and a connoisseur of all things related to Russian collusion), CrowdStrike, or any other evidence lacking chain of custody certification as a primary source for prosecution?
A second point by Apelbaum is –
… that three of the Russian GRU officers on the DOJ “Wanted by the FBI” list were allegedly working concurrently on multiple non-related projects like interfering with the 2016 United States elections (both HRC and DNC) while at the same time they were also allegedly hacking anti-doping agencies (Images 2-3).
Above are pictures of the individuals the FBI says were working on both the DNC/HRC email hacking and the Olympic doping projects.
The same guys were working on both projects which is all but impossible. (Do we really know if they’re even real or even Russians?)
Apelbaum argues –
The fact that the three had multiple concurrent high impact and high visibility project assignments is odd because this is not how typical offensive cyber intelligence teams operate. These units tend to be compartmentalized, they are assigned to a specific mission, and the taskforce stays together for the entire duration of the project.
Next Apelbaum questions the Mueller gang’s assertion that the ‘hacker’ named Guccifer 2.0 was a Russian –
Any evidence that Guccifer 2.0 is Russian should be evaluated while keeping these points in mind:
He used a Russian VPN service to cloak his IP address, but did not use TOR. Using a proxy to conduct cyber operations is a SOP [Standard Operating Procedure] in all intelligence and LEA [Law Enforcement Agency] agencies. [i.e. Russia would have masked their VPN service]
He used the AOL email service that captured and forwarded his IP address and the same AOL email to contact various media outlets on the same day of the attack. This is so overt and amateurish that its unlikely to be a mistake and seems like a deliberate attempt to leave traceable breadcrumbs.
He named his Office User account Феликс Эдмундович (Felix Dzerzhinsky), after the founder of the Soviet Secret Police. Devices and accounts used in offensive cyberspace operations use random names to prevent tractability and identification. Why would anyone in the GRU use this pseudonym (beside the obvious reason) is beyond comprehension.
He copied the original Trump opposition research document and pasted it into a new .dotm template (with an editing time of about 2 minutes). This resulted in a change of the “Last Modified by” field from “Warren Flood” to “Феликс Эдмундович” and the creation of additional Russian metadata in the document. Why waste the time and effort doing this?
About 4 hours after creating the ‘Russian’ version of the document, he exported it to a PDF using LibreOffice 4.2 (in the process he lost/removed about 20 of the original pages). This was most likely done to show additional ‘Russian fingerprints’ in the form of broken hyperlink error messages in Russian (Images 4 and 5). Why bother with re-formatting and converting the source documents? Why not just get the raw data out in the original format ASAP?
Apelbaum next discusses Guccifer 2.0 –
In June 21, 2016, Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai from Vice Motherboard interviewed a person who identified himself as “Guccifer 2.0”. During their on-line chat session, the individual claimed that he was Romanian (see transcript of the interview below). His poor Romanian language skills were later used to unmask his Russian identify. …I’m not a scientific linguist nor do I even know where to find one if my life depended on it, but I’m certain that you can’t reliably determine nationality based on someone impersonating another language or from the use of fake metadata in files. This elaborate theory also has the obvious flaw of assuming that the Russian intelligence services are dumb enough to show up to an interview posing as Romanians without actually being able to read and write flaunt Romanian.
After providing a couple more examples of why the Russian story doesn’t stick, Apelbaum closes with this –


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--UPDATE FROM HONG KONG: Over 71,000 Now Infected with Coronavirus – Hubei Province on Lock Down Til A

UPDATE FROM HONG KONG: Over 71,000 Now Infected with Coronavirus – Hubei Province on Lock Down Til April 15 – China Economy Devastated

UPDATE FROM HONG KONG : Over 71,000 Now Infected with Coronavirus – Hubei Province on Lock Down Til April 15 @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Wuhan coronavirus has reached over 71,000 confirmed cases and over 1,700 confirmed deaths @ @ @ @ @ is now reporting that citizens will be allowed to travel starting on April 15 – @ @ @ @ @ isolation .
The local communities are being shut off from any sort of travel in @ @ @ @ @ a clip from flights traveling back to the US : Locals throughout China and Hong @ @ @ @ @ , only going out for bare necessities : Air travel across China and Hong Kong @ @ @ @ @ : The only real theory for how this started is out of a lab in @ @ @ @ @ of Hubei stated that citizens will be free to travel starting April 15 .
This @ @ @ @ @ .
It ’ s doubtful China ’ s economy can recover .

Live from Hong Kong
China’s Wuhan coronavirus has reached over 71,000 confirmed cases and over 1,700 confirmed deaths. China’s Hubei is now reporting that citizens will be allowed to travel starting on April 15 – only two more months of isolation.
The local communities are being shut off from any sort of travel in Hubei province.
https://twitter.com/IsChinar/status/1225654487563399168
Below was a clip from flights traveling back to the US:
https://twitter.com/IsChinar/status/1225642223506579457
Locals throughout China and Hong Kong are all staying inside, only going out for bare necessities:
https://twitter.com/IsChinar/status/1225599416721080321
Air travel across China and Hong Kong is nearly totally shut down:
https://twitter.com/IsChinar/status/1225583222194655234
The only real theory for how this started is out of a lab in Wuhan:
There is also no proof for any other theory of the origin of #COVID19. Read the January 24 Lancet article, which shows that the wet-market theory holds little water. #China #coronavirus @SenTomCotton @jaketapper https://t.co/8tz8XQbljc — Gordon G. Chang (@GordonGChang) February 17, 2020
Today the province of Hubei stated that citizens will be free to travel starting April 15.
This will not be over soon. It’s doubtful China’s economy can recover.
Hat tip Doug Ross


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--7 Dump Truck Loads Of Crap Hauled From Massive Homeless Camp In Oregon

7 Dump Truck Loads Of Crap Hauled From Massive Homeless Camp In Oregon A rural county along the Oregon coast had it with the transients who built a massive homeless camp on county property .
Curry County officials cleared out the area using heavy machinery and dump trucks , to the tune of $ 20,000 .
The Democrat run shith*le states that make up the west coast have been experiencing a growing homeless crisis for several years .
You can expect the governors to continue to make it look like they are doing something about the problem with their little @ @ @ @ @ @ @ together to examine the issue and make recommendations , which usually result in some new plan to raise taxes to create a new bureau of paper-pusher government employees who do nothing of added value .
Anyways , Linda Pinkham for The Curry Pilot reports : Tarps and makeshift tents covered hundreds of square feet of county property along the South Bank Chetco River Road at the South Bank Underpass Road .
Propped up with poles , the long row of the structures wrapped around the curvature of the bank and sheltered piles of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and heaps of trash .

A rural county along the Oregon coast had it with the transients who built a massive homeless camp on county property. Curry County officials cleared out the area using heavy machinery and dump trucks, to the tune of $20,000.
The Democrat run shith*le states that make up the west coast have been experiencing a growing homeless crisis for several years. You can expect the governors to continue to make it look like they are doing something about the problem with their little task forces and special commissions they put together to examine the issue and make recommendations, which usually result in some new plan to raise taxes to create a new bureau of paper-pusher government employees who do nothing of added value.
Anyways, Linda Pinkham for The Curry Pilot reports:


thegatewaypundit--2020-02-17--Virginia Dems Pass Several RADICAL Bills You Have To See To Believe (VIDEO)

Virginia Dems Pass Several RADICAL Bills You Have To See To Believe ( VIDEO ) Virginia is quickly becoming the @ @ @ @ @ of the Virginia legislature passed radical anti-American bills to allow illegal aliens to obtain a @ @ @ @ @ proof of citizenship .
If Democrat Governor Ralph Northam , aka Governor Blackface , signs @ @ @ @ @ become the 15th state to allow illegal aliens to obtain driver ’ s licenses .

Virginia is quickly becoming the new California.
Both chambers of the Virginia legislature passed radical anti-American bills to allow illegal aliens to obtain a driver’s license without proof of citizenship.
If Democrat Governor Ralph Northam, aka Governor Blackface, signs the bill, Virginia will become the 15th state to allow illegal aliens to obtain driver’s licenses.
WATCH: