thegatewaypundit--2020-09-21--Why Is FOX News Preventing Negative Reporting of George Soros? Gingrich and Toensing Speak Out

We ’ ve reported on Creepy George Soros and his actions that have destroyed the inner cities in the US .
Anti American George Soros was interviewed by 60 Minutes years ago .
In this infamous interview Soros claimed to have no shame for turning in fellow Jews to the Nazis in World War II Hungary .
The Nazis stole from the Jews and Soros claimed that if he didn ’ t do it , someone else would .
This is the man many believe is behind today ’ s modern corrupt Democrat Party : Soros was reportedly behind the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election .
A week before that Soros was reportedly behind 50 Groups involved in the ‘ Women ’ s Protests ’ the day after the inauguration .
Before that , Soros was connected to the groups demanding election recounts after the November 8th election and Soros money was funding more protests during these efforts .
And there was information showing that Soros funded Black Lives Matter protests across the country .
TRENDING : FBI Agent Who Uncovered Weiner Laptop with Hillary 's Emails says FBI Leadership Told Him to Erase All of His @ @ @ @ @ @ @ left billionaire George Soros has been systematically targeting district attorney races throughout the United States .
Many of his backed candidates have won their races and are causing havoc across the country .
US Attorney General Bill Barr spoke with Martha MacCallum on FOX News .
Bill Barr called out George Soros for subverting the legal system in the US and creating more crime and violence .
Attorney Bill Barr is right – Soros-backed District Attorneys are causing mayhem across the US : Soros also backed the new District Attorney in San Francisco @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It is no wonder why Soros groups are banned from entire countries .
So it ’ s strange that FOX News prevents George Soros from being discussed on its programs .
It ’ s like Soros is the name “ Voldemort ” from Harry Potter – the name that must not be said .
This past week Newt Gingrich was on FOX and he talked about the fact that George Soros gave massive financial backing to radical leftists who ran for district attorney in various states , and Gingrich basically got shut @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A few days later , former FOX News host Bill O ’ Reilly stood up for Gingrich .
Newt Gingrich also wrote a column about this subject .
I have been watching a truly curious phenomenon over the past few days .
It seems there is suddenly a movement in media to silence anyone who speaks out against George Soros—and , specifically , his funding of radical prosecutors seeking to change the criminal justice system by simply ignoring certain crimes .
This happened to me personally this week while I was being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When I brought up Soros ’ s plan to get pro-criminal , anti-police prosecutors elected across the country , two of the show ’ s participants interrupted me and forcefully asserted that Soros was not involved .
Host Harris Faulkner , it seemed , was stunned by the interruptions , and did her part to move the show forward after some awkward silence .
The next day , she addressed the strange moment during the show and condemned censorship .
Immediately after the show , Twitter and other social media went crazy .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Soros ’ s political involvement is automatically false , anti-Semitic , or both .
This is ludicrous .
Soros ’ s plan to elect these prosecutors has been well documented already—and it has nothing to do with his spiritual or ethnic background .
The treatment Gingrich received on FOX News made absolutely no sense .
Glenn Beck said he too was treated badly by FOX News for mentioning the Soros name : The great Joe DiGenova and his wife Victoria Toensing were reportedly banned by FOX News as well for calling out George @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sharing the truth about George Soros on the air ?

We’ve reported on Creepy George Soros and his actions that have destroyed the inner cities in the US.
Anti American George Soros was interviewed by 60 Minutes years ago. In this infamous interview Soros claimed to have no shame for turning in fellow Jews to the Nazis in World War II Hungary. The Nazis stole from the Jews and Soros claimed that if he didn’t do it, someone else would. This is the man many believe is behind today’s modern corrupt Democrat Party:
Soros was reportedly behind the airport protests after President Trump’s election. A week before that Soros was reportedly behind 50 Groups involved in the ‘Women’s Protests’ the day after the inauguration. Before that, Soros was connected to the groups demanding election recounts after the November 8th election and Soros money was funding more protests during these efforts. And there was information showing that Soros funded Black Lives Matter protests across the country.
We also have reported that far left billionaire George Soros has been systematically targeting district attorney races throughout the United States. Many of his backed candidates have won their races and are causing havoc across the country.
US Attorney General Bill Barr spoke with Martha MacCallum on FOX News. Bill Barr called out George Soros for subverting the legal system in the US and creating more crime and violence.
Via Jack Posobiec.
AG Barr calls out how Soros is subverting our legal system and leading to more crime and violence pic.twitter.com/fAdCQY6BEi — Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) December 21, 2019
Attorney Bill Barr is right – Soros-backed District Attorneys are causing mayhem across the US:
St. Louis–
Chicago–
St. Louis again–
Boston–
Philly–
And St. Louis again–
Soros also backed the new District Attorney in San Francisco — Bill Ayers’ stepson Chesa Boudin.
It is no wonder why Soros groups are banned from entire countries.
So it’s strange that FOX News prevents George Soros from being discussed on its programs.
It’s like Soros is the name “Voldemort” from Harry Potter – the name that must not be said.
This past week Newt Gingrich was on FOX and he talked about the fact that George Soros gave massive financial backing to radical leftists who ran for district attorney in various states, and Gingrich basically got shut down by some of the network hosts.
A few days later, former FOX News host Bill O’Reilly stood up for Gingrich.
Watch below:
You can’t keep the truth under the carpet !!! Bill O’Reilly on Fox News’ Awkward George Soros Moment He blames Melissa Francis directly and FOX News. “Soros is using his billions of dollars to undermine the justice system in the United States—and you can’t discuss that?” pic.twitter.com/124lZrw0t2 — ™ (@EMKA17 on PARLER) (@EM_KA_17) September 18, 2020
Newt Gingrich also wrote a column about this subject.
From The American Mind:
The Soros Cover-Up I have been watching a truly curious phenomenon over the past few days. Trending: Newt Gingrich Issues Stark Warning on Trump Georgia Indictment (Video) It seems there is suddenly a movement in media to silence anyone who speaks out against George Soros—and, specifically, his funding of radical prosecutors seeking to change the criminal justice system by simply ignoring certain crimes. This happened to me personally this week while I was being interviewed on Fox’s Outnumbered. When I brought up Soros’s plan to get pro-criminal, anti-police prosecutors elected across the country, two of the show’s participants interrupted me and forcefully asserted that Soros was not involved. Host Harris Faulkner, it seemed, was stunned by the interruptions, and did her part to move the show forward after some awkward silence. The next day, she addressed the strange moment during the show and condemned censorship. Immediately after the show, Twitter and other social media went crazy. People were alleging that any criticism of Soros’s political involvement is automatically false, anti-Semitic, or both. This is ludicrous. Soros’s plan to elect these prosecutors has been well documented already—and it has nothing to do with his spiritual or ethnic background.
The treatment Gingrich received on FOX News made absolutely no sense. Glenn Beck said he too was treated badly by FOX News for mentioning the Soros name:
The great Joe DiGenova and his wife Victoria Toensing were reportedly banned by FOX News as well for calling out George Soros:
For those who have asked why we are not on @FoxNews: Hubby said on @LouDobbs accurate statement…that @georgesoros controls part of StateDept. Victoria Nuland had open door policy with him. Can’t criticize Soros on Fox. Just ask @newtgingrich. #maga2020 — Victoria Toensing (@VicToensing) September 17, 2020
Why is FOX afraid of sharing the truth about George Soros on the air?


thegatewaypundit--2020-09-21--More Shady Actions with the Democrats’ Clearinghouse ActBlue – Is China Funding the Biden Campaign?

The Gateway Pundit reported on May 30th that the recent riots in Democrat-led cities around the country were coordinated and linked to domestic terrorists , foreign entities , and other radical groups and Marxists linked to the Democrat Party .
Black Lives Matter ( BLM ) was one of these groups .
The Gateway Pundit was also the first to report that ActBlue was raising money using BLM as its front group .
The Daily Caller confirmed this and reported that BLM is not a non-profit organization and instead nonprofit organization ( Thousand Currents ) said it provides ‘ fiduciary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ administrative services to BLM ’ .
Candice Owen reported on the BLM – ActBlue relationship and was targeted by a bogus fact-checker .
Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch jumped in and stated that the findings confirmed what we and Candice Owen reported : TRENDING : FBI Agent Who Uncovered Weiner Laptop with Hillary 's Emails says FBI Leadership Told Him to Erase All of His Findings “ Thousand Currents ” is a supposedly non-profit organization and Susan Rosenberg served on its Board .
Susan Rosenberg was a member of the Weather Underground terrorist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ayers .
President Bill Clinton gave her a pardon on his last day in office .
Contributions to BLM are funneled through ActBlue , the major resource for Democrat donations , and then funneled to at least one organization run by a member of a domestic terrorist group .
We know that ActBlue in Texas is paying , not only candidates , but thousands of other unidentified individuals .
We question if these unidentified individuals are rioters paid for their attempts to destroy American cities .
Per FOX News half of all donations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , unemployed donors : A preliminary computer analysis by the Take Back Action Fund , obtained exclusively by Fox News , has found that nearly half of all 2019 donations to ActBlue were made by people claiming to be unemployed .
Action Fund President John Pudner questioned the veracity of those donations and called it a loophole that must be closed for the sake of election integrity .
“ After downloading hundreds of millions of [ dollars in ] donations to the Take Back Action Fund servers , we were shocked to see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ActBlue in 2019 claimed to be unemployed individuals , ” he said .
“ The name of employers must be disclosed when making political donations , but more than 4.7 million donations came from people who claimed they did not have an employer .
Those 4.7 million donations totaled $ 346 million ActBlue raised and sent to liberal causes.
” The trend is continuing this year : An Action Fund examination of 2020 data from January through August showed an uptick in “ unemployed ” donations through ActBlue , to 50.1 % this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ActBlue can not confirm if donations to its site are US or foreign donations : “ When Take Back Our Republic first pointed out in 2015 that foreign interests could potentially use gift cards to flood money in through ActBlue ’ s unverified credit card system , more than 100 members of Congress stopped using the system and 31 Democrats joined 52 Republicans in trying to outlaw the practice , ” said John Pudner , president of Take Back Action Fund .
“ It took vendors only a few hours to change @ @ @ @ @ @ @ verify if donations were really from Americans , ” Pudner added .
“ Unfortunately , as things turned harshly partisan after Trump ’ s election , ActBlue doubled down and moved more and more candidates onto an unverified system at a time when intelligence officials are warning that foreign interests want to impact who wins our elections .
TBAF asks ActBlue to join the hundreds who have stopped using this system.
” Today we can report that ActBlue doesn ’ t even require a CVV Code for credit card payments of as little @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When you make a $ 5 contribution to Biden ’ s campaign you are not required to enter your card ’ s CVV code .
Are most of Biden ’ s campaign contributions illegal ?
Biden claims to have hauled in millions last month .
Were these contributions made legally ?
Biden ’ s contribution site raises suspicions .
Biden ’ s page does not require the cardholder to enter his CVV .
The CVV reduces the incidents of fraud .
The lack of a CVV code input field permits fraud to take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tens of thousands of cards numbers with $ 50 donations through his site .
Foreigners could easily donate .
If I were in the RNC , I would definitely cry foul and force Biden ’ s campaign to put in the CVV code requirement .
MOTO merchants ( mail order telephone order , which includes online ) are allowed to store the 16 digits for credit cards ( under certain security constraints ) .
They aren ’ t allowed to store the CVV .
This prevents a thief from obtaining credit card data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a security intrusion in the credit card vault of a merchant , fraudsters wouldn ’ t be able to steal the CVV .
This makes card numbers useless – since you can ’ t use the 16 digits for “ card present ” transactions ( the mag stripe contains more information ) or for “ card not present ” transactions ( since issuers would decline a CNP authorization request that wasn ’ t coming with a CVV ) .
Biden campaign can just load a set of cards with money and run them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t because you have to enter the CVV .
You can get prepaid debit cards online .
You have a program that loads money onto the cards and makes contributions .
There is currently no way of knowing whether China , Iran , Russia , Middle East oil barons or others are donating to the Democrats which leads us to believe they probably are .
Is anything the Democrats do legit and why do Republicans and the Justice Department put up with this ?
This should have been investigated months ago .

The Gateway Pundit reported on May 30th that the recent riots in Democrat-led cities around the country were coordinated and linked to domestic terrorists, foreign entities, and other radical groups and Marxists linked to the Democrat Party. Black Lives Matter (BLM) was one of these groups.
The Gateway Pundit was also the first to report that ActBlue was raising money using BLM as its front group.
The Daily Caller confirmed this and reported that BLM is not a non-profit organization and instead nonprofit organization (Thousand Currents) said it provides ‘fiduciary oversight, financial management, and other administrative services to BLM’.
Candice Owen reported on the BLM – ActBlue relationship and was targeted by a bogus fact-checker. Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch jumped in and stated that the findings confirmed what we and Candice Owen reported:
Transparency? So if you want to make a tax-deductible charitable donation directly to Black Lives Matter, you can't. You donate to Act Blue Charities. Act Blue Charities sends this money, allegedly, to another charity, Thousand Currents, which runs BLM as a "fiscal sponsorship." — Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) June 20, 2020
“Thousand Currents” is a supposedly non-profit organization and Susan Rosenberg served on its Board. Susan Rosenberg was a member of the Weather Underground terrorist group, which included Obama friend Bill Ayers. President Bill Clinton gave her a pardon on his last day in office.
Contributions to BLM are funneled through ActBlue, the major resource for Democrat donations, and then funneled to at least one organization run by a member of a domestic terrorist group.
We know that ActBlue in Texas is paying, not only candidates, but thousands of other unidentified individuals. We question if these unidentified individuals are rioters paid for their attempts to destroy American cities.
Per FOX News half of all donations to ActBlue in 2019 came from untraceable, unemployed donors:
A preliminary computer analysis by the Take Back Action Fund, obtained exclusively by Fox News, has found that nearly half of all 2019 donations to ActBlue were made by people claiming to be unemployed. Action Fund President John Pudner questioned the veracity of those donations and called it a loophole that must be closed for the sake of election integrity. “After downloading hundreds of millions of [dollars in] donations to the Take Back Action Fund servers, we were shocked to see that almost half of the donations to ActBlue in 2019 claimed to be unemployed individuals,” he said. “The name of employers must be disclosed when making political donations, but more than 4.7 million donations came from people who claimed they did not have an employer. Those 4.7 million donations totaled $346 million ActBlue raised and sent to liberal causes.” The trend is continuing this year: An Action Fund examination of 2020 data from January through August showed an uptick in “unemployed” donations through ActBlue, to 50.1% this year.
Action Fund’s Pudner said:
“It is hard to believe that at a time when the U.S. unemployment rate was less than 4 percent, that unemployed people had $346 million dollars to send to ActBlue for liberal causes,” Pudner said, adding that “4.7 million donations from people without a job … raised serious concerns.”
According to Real Clear Politics, ActBlue cannot confirm if donations to its site are US or foreign donations:
“When Take Back Our Republic first pointed out in 2015 that foreign interests could potentially use gift cards to flood money in through ActBlue’s unverified credit card system, more than 100 members of Congress stopped using the system and 31 Democrats joined 52 Republicans in trying to outlaw the practice,” said John Pudner, president of Take Back Action Fund. “It took vendors only a few hours to change their setup to allow the banks to verify if donations were really from Americans,” Pudner added. “Unfortunately, as things turned harshly partisan after Trump’s election, ActBlue doubled down and moved more and more candidates onto an unverified system at a time when intelligence officials are warning that foreign interests want to impact who wins our elections. TBAF asks ActBlue to join the hundreds who have stopped using this system.”
Today we can report that ActBlue doesn’t even require a CVV Code for credit card payments of as little as $5 to their site.
When you make a $5 contribution to Biden’s campaign you are not required to enter your card’s CVV code.
Are most of Biden’s campaign contributions illegal?
Biden claims to have hauled in millions last month. Were these contributions made legally? Biden’s contribution site raises suspicions. Biden’s page does not require the cardholder to enter his CVV. The CVV reduces the incidents of fraud. The lack of a CVV code input field permits fraud to take place. A simple program could run tens of thousands of cards numbers with $50 donations through his site. Foreigners could easily donate.
President Trump’s site requires donors to enter their CVV:
If I were in the RNC, I would definitely cry foul and force Biden’s campaign to put in the CVV code requirement.
MOTO merchants (mail order telephone order, which includes online) are allowed to store the 16 digits for credit cards (under certain security constraints). They aren’t allowed to store the CVV.
This prevents a thief from obtaining credit card data and using it because if there is a security intrusion in the credit card vault of a merchant, fraudsters wouldn’t be able to steal the CVV. This makes card numbers useless – since you can’t use the 16 digits for “card present” transactions (the mag stripe contains more information) or for “card not present” transactions (since issuers would decline a CNP authorization request that wasn’t coming with a CVV).
Biden campaign can just load a set of cards with money and run them any time they want. Trump can’t because you have to enter the CVV. You can get prepaid debit cards online. You have a program that loads money onto the cards and makes contributions.
There is currently no way of knowing whether China, Iran, Russia, Middle East oil barons or others are donating to the Democrats which leads us to believe they probably are.
Is anything the Democrats do legit and why do Republicans and the Justice Department put up with this?
This should have been investigated months ago.
Hat tip Michael O


thegatewaypundit--2020-09-21--MUST SEE VIDEO: True the Vote Founder Catherine Engelbrecht: What You Can Do These Next 44 Days to S

MUST SEE VIDEO: True the Vote Founder Catherine Engelbrecht: What You Can Do These Next 44 Days to SAVE THIS ELECTION FOR TRUMP AND AMERICA!

Catherine Engelbrecht is the Founder and President of True The Vote the nation ’ s largest voters ’ rights group .
The organization for over ten years now has been on the front lines of election fraud prevention by building action-oriented election integrity movements in key states , counties , and precincts .
‘ True the Vote ’ does not advocate for particular parties or candidates only for fair elections at all levels .
The voter rights organization was so successful that True the Vote and its founder Catherine Engelbrecht , were targeted by top federal government agencies including the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , OSHA by the Obama regime .
Under the Obama Administration , those agencies launched 23 audits , investigations , and inquiries , persistently attacking the patriotic group .
Engelbrecht and her organization were harassed by the Obama IRS for months .
The Obama IRS wanted to know Facebook posts , tweets and where Catherine intended to speak .
In June 2019 , after nearly a decade-long battle against the IRS , True the Vote won a major decision in federal court and was awarded maximum attorney fees .
TRENDING : FBI Agent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Emails says FBI Leadership Told Him to Erase All of His Findings Engelbrecht told Breitbart News after the decision , “ This is a huge victory for every American who thinks that they can ’ t go up against the government and get what they deserve.
” As you can imagine this year Democrats are pushing a full throttle assault against the American election system .
Our dearest right as a citizen in this great nation – our right to cast one vote per citizen — is under assault by the Marxist left @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stop at nothing to corrupt this system in their favor .
They are attempting a coup in plain sight on our election system .
This past weekend we spoke with Catherine Engelbrecht and she told us the first thing we can do to save the election for Donald Trump and America ’ s future in the next 44 days !
Catherine and True the Vote offered much needed advice to those Americans worried about this 2020 election .
And here are two important takes : ** First of all you must understand that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NOT END on Election Day on November 3rd !
** And secondly — CHOOSE IN RIGHT NOW !
Go to True the Vote and find our local election official offices .
VOLUNTEER TODAY !
True the Vote has the complete county list on who to call , what to say .
This year just voting IS NOT ENOUGH !
Catherine Engelbrecht : “ We need everyone who can serve , to serve !
” We will continue our discussion with Catherine in the coming days so that the Trump Army is prepared for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ November .

Catherine Engelbrecht is the Founder and President of True The Vote the nation’s largest voters’ rights group.
The organization for over ten years now has been on the front lines of election fraud prevention by building action-oriented election integrity movements in key states, counties, and precincts. ‘True the Vote’ does not advocate for particular parties or candidates only for fair elections at all levels.
The voter rights organization was so successful that True the Vote and its founder Catherine Engelbrecht, were targeted by top federal government agencies including the IRS, DOJ, FBI, ATF, OSHA by the Obama regime. Under the Obama Administration, those agencies launched 23 audits, investigations, and inquiries, persistently attacking the patriotic group. Engelbrecht and her organization were harassed by the Obama IRS for months. The Obama IRS wanted to know Facebook posts, tweets and where Catherine intended to speak.
In June 2019, after nearly a decade-long battle against the IRS, True the Vote won a major decision in federal court and was awarded maximum attorney fees.
Engelbrecht told Breitbart News after the decision, “This is a huge victory for every American who thinks that they can’t go up against the government and get what they deserve.”
As you can imagine this year Democrats are pushing a full throttle assault against the American election system.
Our dearest right as a citizen in this great nation – our right to cast one vote per citizen — is under assault by the Marxist left.
We see already that they will stop at nothing to corrupt this system in their favor.
They are attempting a coup in plain sight on our election system.
This past weekend we spoke with Catherine Engelbrecht and she told us the first thing we can do to save the election for Donald Trump and America’s future in the next 44 days!
Catherine and True the Vote offered much needed advice to those Americans worried about this 2020 election.
Please watch this video!
And here are two important takes:
** First of all you must understand that unlike other years the 2020 election will NOT END on Election Day on November 3rd!
** And secondly — CHOOSE IN RIGHT NOW! Go to True the Vote and find our local election official offices. VOLUNTEER TODAY! True the Vote has the complete county list on who to call, what to say. This year just voting IS NOT ENOUGH!
Catherine Engelbrecht: “We need everyone who can serve, to serve!”
We will continue our discussion with Catherine in the coming days so that the Trump Army is prepared for the corruption the left is planning for November.


thegatewaypundit--2020-09-22--Unhinged Quebec Woman Pascale Ferrier Identified as Suspect in Case of Ricin Letter Sent to Trump Wh

Unhinged Quebec Woman Pascale Ferrier Identified as Suspect in Case of Ricin Letter Sent to Trump White House

A female suspect was arrested by Customs and Border Patrol Agents trying to enter the United States from Canada .
The New York Times reported on Saturday that authorities were seeking an unidentified Canadian woman suspect .
The letter addressed to President Trump was intercepted Saturday by federal agents .
TRENDING : FBI Agent Who Uncovered Weiner Laptop with Hillary 's Emails says FBI Leadership Told Him to Erase All of His Findings Quebec officials identified Pascale Ferrier as the suspect in the case of the ricin letter sent to President Trump last week .
She also sent a ricin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pascale Ferrier has been identified as the suspect alleged to have sent letters containing the poisonous substance ricin to the White House and different locations in Texas , including a police department , CTV News has confirmed .
A team that specializes in biohazards swarmed a Montreal-area condo Monday morning , evacuating several units as they looked for evidence connected to the ricin-laced letter sent to U.S. President Donald Trump .
The letters were intercepted before reaching their destination , and the exact number is “ in flux , ” officials say .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the New York-Ontario border on Sunday while trying to cross the border into Buffalo , N.Y. Ferrier was initially expected to appear in court Monday afternoon in Buffalo to face federal charges in the U.S. , but sources tell CTV News the appointment was postponed to tomorrow .

A female suspect was arrested by Customs and Border Patrol Agents trying to enter the United States from Canada.
The New York Times reported on Saturday that authorities were seeking an unidentified Canadian woman suspect.
The letter addressed to President Trump was intercepted Saturday by federal agents.
Quebec officials identified Pascale Ferrier as the suspect in the case of the ricin letter sent to President Trump last week.
Yup, that’s her.
She also sent a ricin letter to Texas officials.
CTVNews reported:


thegatewaypundit--2020-09-22--Deep State General H.R. McMaster on 60 Minutes Shows He’s Still Part of the Rolling Coup

Former White House NSA General H. R. McMaster was on 60 Minutes Sunday night in another attempt to denigrate the President of the United States , Donald J. Trump .
Although he was as touted as non-political , Deep State McMaster has connections to George Soros , brought future whistleblower Eric Ciaramella into the White House and is apparently still part of the rolling coup to remove the President from office .
General H. R. McMaster came into the White House as General Michael Flynn ’ s replacement .
We don ’ t know who recommended he be brought in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ McMaster could not be trusted .
We reported in December 2017 that former CIA paramilitary officer and member of the Trump transition team , John R. Maguire , reportedly revealed during a fund raising meeting for an intelligence gathering operation in Afghanistan , that National Security Advisor H.R .
McMaster “ authorized surveillance of Stephen Bannon and Trump family members , including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump.
” TRENDING : FBI Agent Who Uncovered Weiner Laptop with Hillary 's Emails says FBI Leadership Told Him to Erase All of His Findings “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inside the CIA who joined in the previous eight years [ under Obama ] and inside the government and they were failing to give the president the intelligence he needed , ” said a person who was pitched by Maguire and other Amyntor personnel .
To support his claim , Maguire told at least two people that National Security Advisor H.R .
McMaster , in coordination with a top official at the National Security Agency , authorized surveillance of Steven Bannon and Trump family members , including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Maguire told the potential donors he also had evidence H.R .
McMaster used a burner phone to send information gathered through the surveillance to a facility in Cyprus owned by George Soros .
McMaster did all he could in the coup to remove President Trump from office and had positions that were the opposite of President Trump ’ s .
As we reported , McMaster purged Trump loyalists who supported Israel and were critical of Iran and radical Islamic terrorism from the National Security Council .
Cernovich reported in June , 2017 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ White House in spite of being connected to Susan Rice in Obama ’ s White House – Eventually , and not soon enough the pro-Iran deal , anti-Israel and pro Afghanistan war general left the White House in early 2018 .
After McMaster left the White House , he was in Munich in early 2018 and he spoke about Russia in a speech at a Munich Security Conference .
The New York Times reported on McMaster ’ s speech : Just hours after the Justice Department indicted 13 Russians in what it charged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2016 election , President Trump ’ s national security adviser , Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster , accused Moscow of engaging in a campaign of “ disinformation , subversion and espionage ” that he said Washington would continue to expose .
The evidence of a Russian effort to interfere in the election “ is now incontrovertible , ” General McMaster said at the Munich Security Conference , an annual meeting of European and American diplomats and security experts , including several senior Russian officials .
On Friday , just hours before the indictment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cyberissues accused Russia of “ the most destructive cyberattack in human history , ” against Ukraine last summer .
Of course we don ’ t even know if the 13 individuals indicted by Mueller were real people .
We knew then and still today that they will never be convicted in a US court of law .
The indictments were a joke .
President Trump replied to McMaster ’ s comments : But in the continuing efforts to remove President Trump from office in a ‘ rolling coup ’ , McMaster showed up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ portrayed as a non-biased decorated general , not a Trump hater .
60 Minutes started off claiming McMaster “ brought a world of experience to the job ” and then presented his accolades before mentioning McMaster ’ s new book .
Then 60 Minutes claimed McMaster was “ a disciple of neither political party ” .
The entire interview was staged as if the Deep State was attempting to build a case of McMaster ’ s goodwill towards all men .
( See full interview here ) .
During the interview McMaster had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not one of those in the White House who were after the President : McMaster also indicated the war in Afghanistan should continue : The entire interview was a shame and supports the impression for many years now that 60 Minutes can not be trusted for non-biased , non-agenda driven , relevant news stories .
Shame on McMaster and 60 Minutes .

Former White House NSA General H. R. McMaster was on 60 Minutes Sunday night in another attempt to denigrate the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.
Although he was as touted as non-political, Deep State McMaster has connections to George Soros, brought future whistleblower Eric Ciaramella into the White House and is apparently still part of the rolling coup to remove the President from office.
General H. R. McMaster came into the White House as General Michael Flynn’s replacement. We don’t know who recommended he be brought in, but the decision was horrible. McMaster could not be trusted.
We reported in December 2017 that former CIA paramilitary officer and member of the Trump transition team, John R. Maguire, reportedly revealed during a fund raising meeting for an intelligence gathering operation in Afghanistan, that National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster “authorized surveillance of Stephen Bannon and Trump family members, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump.”
The Intercept reported:
“[Maguire] said there were people inside the CIA who joined in the previous eight years [under Obama] and inside the government and they were failing to give the president the intelligence he needed,” said a person who was pitched by Maguire and other Amyntor personnel. To support his claim, Maguire told at least two people that National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster, in coordination with a top official at the National Security Agency, authorized surveillance of Steven Bannon and Trump family members, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump. Adding to these unsubstantiated claims, Maguire told the potential donors he also had evidence H.R. McMaster used a burner phone to send information gathered through the surveillance to a facility in Cyprus owned by George Soros.
McMaster did all he could in the coup to remove President Trump from office and had positions that were the opposite of President Trump’s. As we reported, McMaster purged Trump loyalists who supported Israel and were critical of Iran and radical Islamic terrorism from the National Security Council.
Cernovich reported in June, 2017, that McMaster promoted Eric Ciaramella in the White House in spite of being connected to Susan Rice in Obama’s White House –
West Wing officials confirmed to Cernovich Media that Eric Ciaramella, who worked closely with Susan Rice while at NSC, was recently promoted to be H.R. McMaster’s personal aide. Ciaramella will have unfettered access to McMaster’s conversations with foreign leaders.
(Ciaramella was suspected later of being the whistleblower in Rep. Adam Schiff’s criminal and unconstitutional impeachment hearings. McMaster, was in the news siding with the whistleblower when the news of the fake whistleblower was released to the press.)
Eventually, and not soon enough the pro-Iran deal, anti-Israel and pro Afghanistan war general left the White House in early 2018.
After McMaster left the White House, he was in Munich in early 2018 and he spoke about Russia in a speech at a Munich Security Conference. The New York Times reported on McMaster’s speech:
Just hours after the Justice Department indicted 13 Russians in what it charged was a broad conspiracy to alter the 2016 election, President Trump’s national security adviser, Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, accused Moscow of engaging in a campaign of “disinformation, subversion and espionage” that he said Washington would continue to expose. The evidence of a Russian effort to interfere in the election “is now incontrovertible,” General McMaster said at the Munich Security Conference, an annual meeting of European and American diplomats and security experts, including several senior Russian officials. On Friday, just hours before the indictment, the top White House official for cyberissues accused Russia of “the most destructive cyberattack in human history,” against Ukraine last summer.
Of course we don’t even know if the 13 individuals indicted by Mueller were real people. We knew then and still today that they will never be convicted in a US court of law. The indictments were a joke. President Trump replied to McMaster’s comments:
General McMaster forgot to say that the results of the 2016 election were not impacted or changed by the Russians and that the only Collusion was between Russia and Crooked H, the DNC and the Dems. Remember the Dirty Dossier, Uranium, Speeches, Emails and the Podesta Company! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 18, 2018
But in the continuing efforts to remove President Trump from office in a ‘rolling coup’, McMaster showed up on 60 Minutes this weeked and was portrayed as a non-biased decorated general, not a Trump hater.
60 Minutes started off claiming McMaster “brought a world of experience to the job” and then presented his accolades before mentioning McMaster’s new book. Then 60 Minutes claimed McMaster was “a disciple of neither political party”.
The entire interview was staged as if the Deep State was attempting to build a case of McMaster’s goodwill towards all men. (See full interview here).
During the interview McMaster had the gall to indicate that he was not one of those in the White House who were after the President:
Regarding competing groups in the West Wing, former national security adviser H.R. McMaster says there’s one group of advisors “who cast themselves in the role of saving the country and maybe the world from the president.” https://t.co/YBUCccl25v pic.twitter.com/w7UMrFBGBx — 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) September 21, 2020
McMaster also indicated the war in Afghanistan should continue:
On recent Afghan peace talks, H.R. McMaster says President Trump is, in effect, partnering with the Taliban against the Afghan government. McMaster writes in his book that POTUS “cheapened” the sacrifice of the Americans who have died in Afghanistan. https://t.co/758m6JGVpL pic.twitter.com/DIEU9dZmCE — 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) September 21, 2020
The entire interview was a shame and supports the impression for many years now that 60 Minutes cannot be trusted for non-biased, non-agenda driven, relevant news stories. Shame on McMaster and 60 Minutes.


thegatewaypundit--2020-09-22--GOOD! DOJ REFUSES to Send Top Civil Rights Official and Heads of Border Patrol and US Marshals to Te

GOOD! DOJ REFUSES to Send Top Civil Rights Official and Heads of Border Patrol and US Marshals to Testify Before Nadler’s Committee after Bill Barr Debacle

In July US Attorney General Bill Barr was called in to testify before Jerry Nandler and the Democrat idiots running @ @ @ @ @ Chairman Jerry Nadler opened the hearing with several baseless attacks on Attorney General Barr .
@ @ @ @ @ attacked the Attorney General , hurled insults and accused him of all kinds of baseless @ @ @ @ @ the Republican members in the hearing .
TRENDING : FBI Agent Who Uncovered Weiner Laptop @ @ @ @ @ FBI Leadership Told Him to Erase All of His Findings And Rep. Nadler refused to @ @ @ @ @ lunch .
And then to top it off Jerry Nadler took a nap .
So @ @ @ @ @ really that the Department of Justice refused a request by Jerry Nadler and Democrats to @ @ @ @ @ DOJ Civil Rights Division and the heads of the Border Patrol and US Marshals Service @ @ @ @ @ week before the committee .
Here is a copy of the DOJ refusal .

In July US Attorney General Bill Barr was called in to testify before Jerry Nandler and the Democrat idiots running the House Judiciary Committee.
Chairman Jerry Nadler opened the hearing with several baseless attacks on Attorney General Barr.
Nadler and his fellow Democrats attacked the Attorney General, hurled insults and accused him of all kinds of baseless atrocities.
Crazy Nadler abused the Republican members in the hearing.
And Rep. Nadler refused to allow AG Barr from taking lunch.
And then to top it off Jerry Nadler took a nap.
It was a complete sham.
So it should be no surprise really that the Department of Justice refused a request by Jerry Nadler and Democrats to interrogate the top of the DOJ Civil Rights Division and the heads of the Border Patrol and US Marshals Service to come and testify next week before the committee.
It’s a complete waste of time.
Here is a copy of the DOJ refusal.
page 1
page 2
page 3
Via Buzzfeed reporter Zoe Tillman.


thegatewaypundit--2020-09-22--Analysis: Senate Russiagate Report Left Big Stones Unturned – Two Being Mifsud and Assange

Guest post by Aaron Maté , RealClearInvestigations and republished by permission Part 2 of a two-article analysis ( Part 1 here ) .
Above , Julian Assange .
Like the Special Counsel ’ s team before it , the Senate Intelligence Committee passed up an interview with the WikiLeaks founder .
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence ’ s fifth and final Russia report has been widely greeted as a vindication of the Russia intrigue that has gripped the nation since 2016 .
Democratic Sen. Mark Warner says the report cataloged “ a breathtaking level of contacts between Trump officials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very real counterintelligence threat to our elections.
” The SSCI report , however , fails to show any coordinated activity between Trump , his campaign , and Russia .
A companion article by RealClearInvestigations , for example , reports that its bombshell allegation – that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort worked closely and shared information with a Russian intelligence officer – is based on innuendo rather than hard evidence .
TRENDING : FBI Agent Who Uncovered Weiner Laptop with Hillary 's Emails says FBI Leadership Told Him to Erase All of His @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shows other instances where broad claims are made based on innocuous facts or heavily redacted material , making independent verification impossible .
As was the case with the report issued by Special Counsel Robert Mueller , the Senate document minimizes or entirely omits countervailing information that calls into question its explosive suppositions , while including testimony that does not hold up to scrutiny .
The Senate report also failed to document key facts because the committee did not interview important witnesses .
The report has been widely described as bipartisan , but it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ R-Idaho ) , the lone senator to vote against the committee ’ s findings , claims the report relies heavily on speculation , not evidence .
“ Yes , I disagree with the report ’ s ‘ assessment , ’ as there was no factual substantiation of it , ” Risch said in a statement .
“ The report assumes much.
” A spokesperson for Risch declined further comment .
Warner ’ s office did not respond to emailed questions about the panel ’ s work .
The FBI maintains that the years-long @ @ @ @ @ @ @ barroom conservation .
Over drinks in London in May 2016 , a low-level Trump campaign adviser named George Papadopoulos reportedly told an Australian diplomat that he had been tipped off that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton .
Papadopoulos later told the FBI that the information came from a Maltese academic named Joseph Mifsud .
The Senate report , however , casts doubt on this origin story , only going so far as to say Papadopoulos “ likely learned about the Russian active measures campaign as early as April 2016 from Joseph Mifsud.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ 500 pages later , contradicting itself , the report drops the qualifier : “ The Committee found Mifsud was aware of an aspect of Russia ’ s active measures campaign in the 2016 election and that Mifsud told Papadopoulos what he knew.
” The FBI maintains that the years-long Trump-Russia probe was triggered by a single barroom conservation .
Over drinks in London in May 2016 , a low-level Trump campaign adviser named George Papadopoulos reportedly told an Australian diplomat that he had been tipped off that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the information came from a Maltese academic named Joseph Mifsud .
The report spends dozens of pages on Mifsud , yet adds no new information to support the suspicion that he had advance knowledge of a Russian interference plot .
Instead the report falls back on vague , equivocal language and insinuation .
It describes Papadopoulos ’ interactions with Mifsud as “ highly suspicious , ” and claims that Mifsud “ exhibited behavior consistent with intelligence tradecraft ” while maintaining “ significant ties to Russian government and business circles.
” As with its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russian agent , the report ignores Mifsud ’ s far more extensive public contacts with Western diplomats , including the FBI , CIA and State Department .
Mifsud ’ s U.S. government ties even brought him to Washington in February 2017 , where he spoke at a State Department-sponsored conference .
Despite Mifsud ’ s allegedly central role in its investigation , the FBI held just one known interview with him , in a D.C. hotel lobby .
While the Senate report quotes extensively from the FBI ’ s interview summaries ( known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including Papadopoulos , it contains no visible reference to the FBI ’ s 302 on Mifsud ( other references may be redacted ) .
Mifsud ’ s FBI 302 , however , was publicly disclosed just days after the Senate report ’ s release .
The Mifsud 302 provides two pieces of evidence that raise new questions about the origins of Russiagate .
First , Mifsud denied having advance knowledge of Russian dirt on Hillary Clinton or offering help to Papadopoulos .
Second , and remarkably , the summary of this lone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contains no indication of any follow-up questions by the interviewing agents .
By contrast , the FBI ’ s 302 of its January 2017 interview with Michael Flynn ran five pages and contained multiple follow-up questions about Flynn ’ s recollection of events .
In another curious contrast , while the Mueller team indicted Flynn for making false statements to the FBI , it never indicted Mifsud despite later claiming , in its final report , that he had committed the same offense .
Mifsud , the Mueller report claimed , falsely denied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2016 .
The Senate report gives no indication that it sought to answer the many unanswered questions regarding Mifsud ’ s identity and actions .
The Senate report reveals a similar lack of investigative zeal regarding the other key episode that launched Russiagate : WikiLeaks ’ release of stolen Democratic Party emails .
According to the FBI , Alexander Downer , the Australian diplomat whom Papadopoulos supposedly spoke to in London , thought nothing of the conversation until weeks later in July 2016 , when Julian Assange and WikiLeaks published the first tranche @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russia was using the website to publish the dirt Papadopoulos had mentioned .
The Senate committee states in its report simply that it “ requested but did not obtain an interview with Julian Assange , ” the WikiLeaks founder now fighting extradition from Britain to the U.S. A source close to WikiLeaks told RealClearInvestigations that Assange ’ s U.S. legal team agreed to an interview but that the Senate committee never followed-up on his response .
Attorney Adam Waldman , who had served as an intermediary between Assange and the U.S. government , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ranking Democrat , Warner , told him to cut off talks with Assange in April 2017 .
According to Waldman , Warner was acting at the behest of then-FBI Director James Comey , who reportedly told the Virginia senator to “ stand down.
” Comey has never commented on the incident .
The Senate report once again relies on speculative language , contending that WikiLeaks “ likely knew it was assisting a Russian intelligence influence effort ” when it obtained and released Democratic Party emails during the 2016 campaign .
It is unclear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
What is clear is that , just like the Mueller team before it , the committee passed up an opportunity to seek answers from the WikiLeaks publisher himself .
Waldman ’ s contacts with Sen. Warner extended beyond the issue of Assange .
They reveal more of the Senate report ’ s missed opportunities with key witnesses .
Waldman also spoke to Warner about securing the testimony of his client Oleg Deripaska , the Russian oligarch best known for his association with Paul Manafort .
In 2017 , after Deripaska ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him and Manafort to potential collusion , the aluminum tycoon took out newspapers ads offering to testify before Congress .
The Senate panel does not explain why it did not take up Deripaska ’ s offer .
Waldman has claimed that the committee lost interest after he relayed that his client would not testify about collusion because “ he doesn ’ t know anything about that theory and actually doesn ’ t believe it occurred.
” Waldman also accused members of the Senate of masking their disinterest by leaking false claims that Deripaska @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appearance .
“ Clearly , they did not want him to testify , ” Waldman said .
The Committee ’ s approach to Deripaska also reveals more inconsistencies in how it scrutinizes Russian connections .
The committee accuses Deripaska of acting as “ proxy ” for the Kremlin and conducting “ influence operations ” on its behalf , and says that his associates ’ proximity to Manafort constituted a “ grave counterintelligence threat.
” Yet the committee adopts a very different tone when it comes to Deripaska ’ s other U.S. connections – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russia investigation .
In 2009 , when Robert Mueller headed the FBI , Deripaska funded a secret effort to rescue a captured CIA operative , Robert Levinson , in Iran .
The Senate report mentions this in passing , and reduces it to “ Deripaska ’ s alleged cooperation with the FBI.
” But the cooperation was so substantial that the FBI repaid the favor by securing a U.S. visa for Deripaska – a fact unmentioned in the report .
Also omitted is the fact that the FBI even tried to recruit Deripaska @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The effort was abandoned two years later after the Russian tycoon informed agents that he had nothing to offer on Trump-Russia collusion , a theory he found “ preposterous.
” While Deripaska did not become an FBI source , he employed a key figure who did .
The committee states that it found “ multiple links ” between Deripaska and Christopher Steele , the former British spy whose discredited Trump-Russia dossier was used for FBI surveillance applications and investigative leads .
The report found that Steele worked for Deripaska from at least 2012 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to recover money from Paul Manafort .
The report also quietly mentions that several people behind the dissemination of the Steele dossier have Deripaska ties .
In a footnote , the committee recounts testimony from former John McCain aide David Kramer that Glenn Simpson — co-founder of Fusion GPS , the DNC contractor that hired Steele — worked for Deripaska .
Simpson downplayed this connection , a “ discrepancy ” that the committee says it did not resolve .
( Kramer , was also a key figure in publicizing the dossier , leaking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
Simpson also refused to answer the Senate panel ’ s additional questions about Steele ’ s work for Deripaska .
Also relegated to a footnote is the fact that Jonathan Winer , a State Department official who also used his position to spread the Steele dossier , acknowledged that he is a former Deripaska employee as well .
The committee acknowledges that the Deripaska-Steele connection may have provided a “ direct channel for Russian influence ” on the dossier , and accordingly the FBI investigation that used it .
Yet despite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conclude that Deripaska ’ s proximity to the dossier ’ s author , not to mention several key individuals who disseminated it , amounts to a grave counterintelligence threat .
A key component of the Trump/Russia conspiracy theory was that the Trump campaign conspired with , or had privileged information about , WikiLeaks ’ email releases .
Like the Mueller team before it , the Senate committee fans the flames of this explosive claim in the dozens of pages it devotes to the actions of the veteran GOP operative Roger Stone .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ report says , Stone “ likely ” shared “ additional information about WikiLeaks directly with Trump , ” and the two “ likely spoke about WikiLeaks.
” But the Senate committee also acknowledges that it “ could not reliably determine the extent of authentic , non-public knowledge about WikiLeaks that Stone obtained and shared with the Campaign.
” That is because , as the Mueller investigation made clear , Stone never obtained any non-public knowledge about WikiLeaks .
His two suspected intermediaries , Jerome Corsi and Randy Credico , had no actual contact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information to share .
Nonetheless , the Senate report goes to great lengths to suggest that WikiLeaks ’ Oct. 7 , 2016 release of emails stolen from Clinton ’ s campaign manager , John Podesta , was coordinated with Stone and Corsi in order to blunt the impact of the so-called “ Access Hollywood ” tape in which Trump made extremely coarse comments about women .
While it pores over Corsi ’ s statements and recounts in granular detail his communications with Stone , the Senate report ignores countervailing , open source information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , an Italian journalist who worked with WikiLeaks on the Podesta release , has recounted that the timing of the Podesta publication was decided the day before its release .
Maurizi confirmed to RealClearInvestigations that she was not invited to testify .
The Senate report ’ s section on former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen reveals a willingness to include false information that fuels the Russiagate narrative .
A popular theory – advanced most recently by former FBI agent Peter Strzok — contends that Trump is beholden to Russia financially , and thus subject @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s supposed financial entanglements with Moscow is his aborted effort to build a Trump Tower in Moscow .
The Senate report repeatedly cites this project but never reveals anything beyond what was already known : The effort was entirely prospective , and never advanced beyond a non-binding letter of intent as well as — in Cohen ’ s angry words to a colleague — “ a bullshit garbage invite ” to Russia “ by some no name clerk at a third-tier bank.
” As Cohen told MSNBC earlier this month : “ There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ financing of this project .
There was never a piece of property to put it on.
” Nevertheless , the report includes Cohen ’ s implausible testimony describing the campaign period up until June 2016 , when the Trump Tower Moscow project was abandoned for good .
Cohen told the committee : It is certainly true that Trump did not disclose the Trump Tower Moscow project on the campaign trail .
But the public record is clear that it would have been impossible for Trump to claim “ no Russian collusion ” in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Moscow in private .
Up until June 2016 , Trump ’ s dealings with Russia were barely a public issue , and “ collusion ” was not one at all .
Collusion would only arise publicly many months later , after the 2016 election , making Cohen ’ s account untenable .
Cohen made similarly false statements to the House Intelligence Committee in early 2019 .
Yet , despite being indicted for false statements to Congress that the Mueller team claimed were aimed at protecting Trump , he has faced no scrutiny or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Trump ’ s illicit Russian ties .
Instead of providing clarity , the Senate report creates new confusion regarding a central question : Did the Russians actually steal Democratic Party emails by hacking into the DNC servers ?
The FBI never directly examined the servers that housed the purloined emails .
Jim Comey said he made “ multiple requests ” to the DNC for the servers but was rebuffed .
It is not clear why he took no for answer .
As a result , the bureau – as well as Mueller @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a forensic analysis performed by a DNC contractor , CrowdStrike .
The report recounts that during his interview with the committee , CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry said his firm had found evidence of Russian hacking .
It states : Henry ’ s claim that Crowdstrike was “ able to see some exfiltration ” is at odds with his testimony to the House Intelligence Committee in December 2017 .
As RealClearInvestigations has previously reported , Henry testified then that CrowdStrike “ did not have concrete evidence ” that Russian hackers exfiltrated data from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s circumstantial evidence , but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated , ” he told the House panel .
“ There are times when we can see data exfiltrated , and we can say conclusively .
But in this case , it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated , but we just don ’ t have the evidence that says it actually left.
” Asked by RCI to explain the discrepancy , a CrowdStrike representative referred RealClearInvestigation to the firm ’ s blog post in response to the release of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stated in his testimony to the House Intelligence Committee that CrowdStrike had indicators of exfiltration and that data had clearly left the network , ” the post says .
The SSCI also draws heavily on CrowdStrike ’ s analysis of the DNC server in reports that have never been publicly released .
Justice Department officials have previously disclosed that CrowdStrike ’ s reports were delivered in draft form , and redacted by DNC attorneys .
Both CrowdStrike and the DNC claim to have fully cooperated with the FBI , but the Senate report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 31 , 2016 , as the FBI ’ s investigation of the DNC server breach was in full swing , CrowdStrike delivered a draft report that an unidentified FBI official described as “ heavily redacted.
” James Trainor , then-assistant director of the FBI ’ s Cyber Division , told the SSCI that he was “ frustrated ” with the CrowdStrike report and “ doubted its completeness.
” Although the committee claims that the FBI ultimately obtained the data it sought , Trainor testified that the DNC ’ s cooperation was “ moderate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in many respects.
” Trainor singled out the fact that Perkins Coie , the DNC law firm that hired CrowdStrike ( as well as Fusion GPS , the firm behind the Steele dossier ) , “ scrubbed ” the CrowdStrike information before it was delivered to the FBI : From an investigatory point of view , it is also not optimal that the two core allegations at the heart of Russiagate – the alleged Russian theft of Democratic Party emails and the Trump campaign ’ s potential collusion with the Kremlin – were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Fusion GPS .
Yet despite criticizing the FBI for failing to properly vet Christopher Steele , the SSCI report does not take issue with the outsized role and partisan conflicts of these two private firms .
Although the Senate report has been widely interpreted as a bipartisan endorsement of the Trump-Russia collusion theory , that picture is misleading .
Six Republican members state unequivocally in an addendum that the investigation “ found no evidence ” that the Trump campaign “ colluded with the Russian government ” in 2016 .
In early 2019 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a Democratic aide on the committee acknowledged to CNN that it had “ not uncovered direct evidence of collusion.
” The Senate committee itself has also had a direct role in the selective leaks that fueled the collusion narrative .
In 2018 , James Wolfe — the SSCI ’ s longtime director of security – was convicted of lying to the FBI about his contacts with journalists about classified information before the committee .
Wolfe had a romantic relationship with one of those reporters , Ali Watkins , now at the New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for BuzzFeed about Carter Page ’ s contacts with alleged Russian spies .
In what is perhaps a nod to the fact that its final report is heavy on speculation and light on new evidence , the SSCI opens the nearly 1,000-page document with the disclaimer that it “ does not describe the final result as a complete picture.
” In an addendum , five of the committee ’ s Democratic members note that the panel ’ s “ power to investigate — which does not include search warrants or wiretaps — falls @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So too do its staffing , resources , and technical capabilities.
” As a result , far from being treated as a breakthrough in the years-long Trump-Russia saga , the SSCI ’ s main contribution to the available picture is its own creative interpretation of previously known information .
Its release comes while another major investigation with far greater investigative powers is believed to be near completion .
The review by U.S. Attorney John Durham into the origins of the Russia probe recently yielded its first indictment .
Whether more are forthcoming or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Senate intelligence panel ’ s last word on the Russia investigation underscores that the full story has yet to be told .

Guest post by Aaron Maté, RealClearInvestigations and republished by permission
Part 2 of a two-article analysis (Part 1 here). Above, Julian Assange. Like the Special Counsel’s team before it, the Senate Intelligence Committee passed up an interview with the WikiLeaks founder.
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’s fifth and final Russia report has been widely greeted as a vindication of the Russia intrigue that has gripped the nation since 2016. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner says the report cataloged “a breathtaking level of contacts between Trump officials and Russian government operatives that is a very real counterintelligence threat to our elections.”
The SSCI report, however, fails to show any coordinated activity between Trump, his campaign, and Russia. A companion article by RealClearInvestigations, for example, reports that its bombshell allegation – that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort worked closely and shared information with a Russian intelligence officer – is based on innuendo rather than hard evidence.
A close reading of the report shows other instances where broad claims are made based on innocuous facts or heavily redacted material, making independent verification impossible. As was the case with the report issued by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, the Senate document minimizes or entirely omits countervailing information that calls into question its explosive suppositions, while including testimony that does not hold up to scrutiny. The Senate report also failed to document key facts because the committee did not interview important witnesses.
The report has been widely described as bipartisan, but it was not unanimous. Jim Risch (R-Idaho), the lone senator to vote against the committee’s findings, claims the report relies heavily on speculation, not evidence. “Yes, I disagree with the report’s ‘assessment,’ as there was no factual substantiation of it,” Risch said in a statement. “The report assumes much.”
A spokesperson for Risch declined further comment. Warner’s office did not respond to emailed questions about the panel’s work.
The Missing Mifsud 302
The FBI maintains that the years-long Trump-Russia probe was triggered by a single barroom conservation. Over drinks in London in May 2016, a low-level Trump campaign adviser named George Papadopoulos reportedly told an Australian diplomat that he had been tipped off that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton. Papadopoulos later told the FBI that the information came from a Maltese academic named Joseph Mifsud.
The Senate report, however, casts doubt on this origin story, only going so far as to say Papadopoulos “likely learned about the Russian active measures campaign as early as April 2016 from Joseph Mifsud.” (emphasis added.) Nearly 500 pages later, contradicting itself, the report drops the qualifier: “The Committee found Mifsud was aware of an aspect of Russia’s active measures campaign in the 2016 election and that Mifsud told Papadopoulos what he knew.”
The FBI maintains that the years-long Trump-Russia probe was triggered by a single barroom conservation. Over drinks in London in May 2016, a low-level Trump campaign adviser named George Papadopoulos reportedly told an Australian diplomat that he had been tipped off that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton. Papadopoulos later told the FBI that the information came from a Maltese academic named Joseph Mifsud.
The report spends dozens of pages on Mifsud, yet adds no new information to support the suspicion that he had advance knowledge of a Russian interference plot. Instead the report falls back on vague, equivocal language and insinuation. It describes Papadopoulos’ interactions with Mifsud as “highly suspicious,” and claims that Mifsud “exhibited behavior consistent with intelligence tradecraft” while maintaining “significant ties to Russian government and business circles.” As with its handling of Konstantin Kilimnik, another supposedly Russian agent, the report ignores Mifsud’s far more extensive public contacts with Western diplomats, including the FBI, CIA and State Department.
Mifsud’s U.S. government ties even brought him to Washington in February 2017, where he spoke at a State Department-sponsored conference. Despite Mifsud’s allegedly central role in its investigation, the FBI held just one known interview with him, in a D.C. hotel lobby. While the Senate report quotes extensively from the FBI’s interview summaries (known as 302s) of multiple Mueller witnesses, including Papadopoulos, it contains no visible reference to the FBI’s 302 on Mifsud (other references may be redacted).
Mifsud’s FBI 302, however, was publicly disclosed just days after the Senate report’s release.
The Mifsud 302 provides two pieces of evidence that raise new questions about the origins of Russiagate. First, Mifsud denied having advance knowledge of Russian dirt on Hillary Clinton or offering help to Papadopoulos. Second, and remarkably, the summary of this lone interview runs just two pages long and contains no indication of any follow-up questions by the interviewing agents. By contrast, the FBI’s 302 of its January 2017 interview with Michael Flynn ran five pages and contained multiple follow-up questions about Flynn’s recollection of events. In another curious contrast, while the Mueller team indicted Flynn for making false statements to the FBI, it never indicted Mifsud despite later claiming, in its final report, that he had committed the same offense. Mifsud, the Mueller report claimed, falsely denied having two meetings with Papadopoulos in April 2016.
The Senate report gives no indication that it sought to answer the many unanswered questions regarding Mifsud’s identity and actions.
Assange: Another Missed Opportunity
The Senate report reveals a similar lack of investigative zeal regarding the other key episode that launched Russiagate: WikiLeaks’ release of stolen Democratic Party emails.
According to the FBI, Alexander Downer, the Australian diplomat whom Papadopoulos supposedly spoke to in London, thought nothing of the conversation until weeks later in July 2016, when Julian Assange and WikiLeaks published the first tranche of stolen emails. Downer suspected that Russia was using the website to publish the dirt Papadopoulos had mentioned.
The Senate committee states in its report simply that it “requested but did not obtain an interview with Julian Assange,” the WikiLeaks founder now fighting extradition from Britain to the U.S. A source close to WikiLeaks told RealClearInvestigations that Assange’s U.S. legal team agreed to an interview but that the Senate committee never followed-up on his response. Attorney Adam Waldman, who had served as an intermediary between Assange and the U.S. government, has claimed that the committee’s ranking Democrat, Warner, told him to cut off talks with Assange in April 2017. According to Waldman, Warner was acting at the behest of then-FBI Director James Comey, who reportedly told the Virginia senator to “stand down.” Comey has never commented on the incident.
The Senate report once again relies on speculative language, contending that WikiLeaks “likely knew it was assisting a Russian intelligence influence effort” when it obtained and released Democratic Party emails during the 2016 campaign. It is unclear how the committee arrived at this conclusion. What is clear is that, just like the Mueller team before it, the committee passed up an opportunity to seek answers from the WikiLeaks publisher himself.
Different Standards on Deripaska
Waldman’s contacts with Sen. Warner extended beyond the issue of Assange. They reveal more of the Senate report’s missed opportunities with key witnesses.
Waldman also spoke to Warner about securing the testimony of his client Oleg Deripaska, the Russian oligarch best known for his association with Paul Manafort. In 2017, after Deripaska’s name surfaced in media reports that tied him and Manafort to potential collusion, the aluminum tycoon took out newspapers ads offering to testify before Congress. The Senate panel does not explain why it did not take up Deripaska’s offer. Waldman has claimed that the committee lost interest after he relayed that his client would not testify about collusion because “he doesn’t know anything about that theory and actually doesn’t believe it occurred.” Waldman also accused members of the Senate of masking their disinterest by leaking false claims that Deripaska had demanded immunity as a condition of appearance. “Clearly, they did not want him to testify,” Waldman said.
The Committee’s approach to Deripaska also reveals more inconsistencies in how it scrutinizes
Russian connections. The committee accuses Deripaska of acting as “proxy” for the Kremlin and conducting “influence operations” on its behalf, and says that his associates’ proximity to Manafort constituted a “grave counterintelligence threat.”
Yet the committee adopts a very different tone when it comes to Deripaska’s other U.S. connections – most notably to the FBI and the Russia investigation. In 2009, when Robert Mueller headed the FBI, Deripaska funded a secret effort to rescue a captured CIA operative, Robert Levinson, in Iran. The Senate report mentions this in passing, and reduces it to “Deripaska’s alleged cooperation with the FBI.” But the cooperation was so substantial that the FBI repaid the favor by securing a U.S. visa for Deripaska – a fact unmentioned in the report. Also omitted is the fact that the FBI even tried to recruit Deripaska as an informant starting in 2014. The effort was abandoned two years later after the Russian tycoon informed agents that he had nothing to offer on Trump-Russia collusion, a theory he found “preposterous.”
While Deripaska did not become an FBI source, he employed a key figure who did. The committee states that it found “multiple links” between Deripaska and Christopher Steele, the former British spy whose discredited Trump-Russia dossier was used for FBI surveillance applications and investigative leads. The report found that Steele worked for Deripaska from at least 2012 to 2017, including for an attempt to recover money from Paul Manafort.
The report also quietly mentions that several people behind the dissemination of the Steele dossier have Deripaska ties. In a footnote, the committee recounts testimony from former John McCain aide David Kramer that Glenn Simpson — co-founder of Fusion GPS, the DNC contractor that hired Steele — worked for Deripaska. Simpson downplayed this connection, a “discrepancy” that the committee says it did not resolve. (Kramer, was also a key figure in publicizing the dossier, leaking it to Buzzfeed and other media outlets). Simpson also refused to answer the Senate panel’s additional questions about Steele’s work for Deripaska. Also relegated to a footnote is the fact that Jonathan Winer, a State Department official who also used his position to spread the Steele dossier, acknowledged that he is a former Deripaska employee as well.
The committee acknowledges that the Deripaska-Steele connection may have provided a “direct channel for Russian influence” on the dossier, and accordingly the FBI investigation that used it. Yet despite this risk, the committee does not conclude that Deripaska’s proximity to the dossier’s author, not to mention several key individuals who disseminated it, amounts to a grave counterintelligence threat.
‘Authentic, Non-Public Knowledge’
A key component of the Trump/Russia conspiracy theory was that the Trump campaign conspired with, or had privileged information about, WikiLeaks’ email releases. Like the Mueller team before it, the Senate committee fans the flames of this explosive claim in the dozens of pages it devotes to the actions of the veteran GOP operative Roger Stone. In June and October 2016, the Senate report says, Stone “likely” shared “additional information about WikiLeaks directly with Trump,” and the two “likely spoke about WikiLeaks.”
But the Senate committee also acknowledges that it “could not reliably determine the extent of authentic, non-public knowledge about WikiLeaks that Stone obtained and shared with the Campaign.”
That is because, as the Mueller investigation made clear, Stone never obtained any non-public knowledge about WikiLeaks. His two suspected intermediaries, Jerome Corsi and Randy Credico, had no actual contact with WikiLeaks, and accordingly had no information to share.
Nonetheless, the Senate report goes to great lengths to suggest that WikiLeaks’ Oct. 7, 2016 release of emails stolen from Clinton’s campaign manager, John Podesta, was coordinated with Stone and Corsi in order to blunt the impact of the so-called “Access Hollywood” tape in which Trump made extremely coarse comments about women.
While it pores over Corsi’s statements and recounts in granular detail his communications with Stone, the Senate report ignores countervailing, open source information that undermines the innuendo. Stefania Maurizi, an Italian journalist who worked with WikiLeaks on the Podesta release, has recounted that the timing of the Podesta publication was decided the day before its release. Maurizi confirmed to RealClearInvestigations that she was not invited to testify.
‘How’s Things Going With Russia?’
The Senate report’s section on former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen reveals a willingness to include false information that fuels the Russiagate narrative. A popular theory – advanced most recently by former FBI agent Peter Strzok — contends that Trump is beholden to Russia financially, and thus subject to compromise. Chief among Trump’s supposed financial entanglements with Moscow is his aborted effort to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. The Senate report repeatedly cites this project but never reveals anything beyond what was already known: The effort was entirely prospective, and never advanced beyond a non-binding letter of intent as well as — in Cohen’s angry words to a colleague — “a bullshit garbage invite” to Russia “by some no name clerk at a third-tier bank.” As Cohen told MSNBC earlier this month: “There was never discussion with anybody about the financing of this project. There was never a piece of property to put it on.”
Nevertheless, the report includes Cohen’s implausible testimony describing the campaign period up until June 2016, when the Trump Tower Moscow project was abandoned for good. Cohen told the committee:
In other words, Mr. Trump is out there on the rally, in the public, stating there’s no Russian collusion, there’s no involvement, there’s no deals, there’s no connection. And yet, the following day, as we’re walking to his car, he’s asking me, “How’s things going with Russia?”
It is certainly true that Trump did not disclose the Trump Tower Moscow project on the campaign trail. But the public record is clear that it would have been impossible for Trump to claim “no Russian collusion” in public while simultaneously asking about Trump Tower Moscow in private. Up until June 2016, Trump’s dealings with Russia were barely a public issue, and “collusion” was not one at all. Collusion would only arise publicly many months later, after the 2016 election, making Cohen’s account untenable. Cohen made similarly false statements to the House Intelligence Committee in early 2019. Yet, despite being indicted for false statements to Congress that the Mueller team claimed were aimed at protecting Trump, he has faced no scrutiny or charges for statements that fueled the narrative of Trump’s illicit Russian ties.
New Questions for CrowdStrike
Instead of providing clarity, the Senate report creates new confusion regarding a central question: Did the Russians actually steal Democratic Party emails by hacking into the DNC servers? The FBI never directly examined the servers that housed the purloined emails. Jim Comey said he made “multiple requests” to the DNC for the servers but was rebuffed. It is not clear why he took no for answer.
As a result, the bureau – as well as Mueller and the Senate committee – relied heavily on a forensic analysis performed by a DNC contractor, CrowdStrike. The report recounts that during his interview with the committee, CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry said his firm had found evidence of Russian hacking. It states:
Henry testified that CrowdStrike was “able to see some exfiltration and the types of files that had been touched” but not the content of those files.
Henry’s claim that Crowdstrike was “able to see some exfiltration” is at odds with his testimony to the House Intelligence Committee in December 2017. As RealClearInvestigations has previously reported, Henry testified then that CrowdStrike “did not have concrete evidence” that Russian hackers exfiltrated data from the DNC servers. “There’s circumstantial evidence, but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated,” he told the House panel. “There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case, it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left.” Asked by RCI to explain the discrepancy, a CrowdStrike representative referred RealClearInvestigation to the firm’s blog post in response to the release of his House testimony. “Shawn Henry stated in his testimony to the House Intelligence Committee that CrowdStrike had indicators of exfiltration and that data had clearly left the network,” the post says.
The SSCI also draws heavily on CrowdStrike’s analysis of the DNC server in reports that have never been publicly released. Justice Department officials have previously disclosed that CrowdStrike’s reports were delivered in draft form, and redacted by DNC attorneys. Both CrowdStrike and the DNC claim to have fully cooperated with the FBI, but the Senate report tells a different story.
On Aug. 31, 2016, as the FBI’s investigation of the DNC server breach was in full swing, CrowdStrike delivered a draft report that an unidentified FBI official described as “heavily redacted.” James Trainor, then-assistant director of the FBI’s Cyber Division, told the SSCI that he was “frustrated” with the CrowdStrike report and “doubted its completeness.” Although the committee claims that the FBI ultimately obtained the data it sought, Trainor testified that the DNC’s cooperation was “moderate” overall and “slow and laborious in many respects.” Trainor singled out the fact that Perkins Coie, the DNC law firm that hired CrowdStrike (as well as Fusion GPS, the firm behind the Steele dossier), “scrubbed” the CrowdStrike information before it was delivered to the FBI:
As Trainor told the Committee: “having that information [raw data about the computer intrusion] collected, fully viewed by an attorney, scrubbed, sent over to the FBI in a stripped-down version three weeks later is not optimal.”
From an investigatory point of view, it is also not optimal that the two core allegations at the heart of Russiagate – the alleged Russian theft of Democratic Party emails and the Trump campaign’s potential collusion with the Kremlin – were generated by Democratic Party contractors, CrowdStrike and Fusion GPS. Yet despite criticizing the FBI for failing to properly vet Christopher Steele, the SSCI report does not take issue with the outsized role and partisan conflicts of these two private firms.
‘The Power to Investigate’
Although the Senate report has been widely interpreted as a bipartisan endorsement of the Trump-Russia collusion theory, that picture is misleading. Six Republican members state unequivocally in an addendum that the investigation “found no evidence” that the Trump campaign “colluded with the Russian government” in 2016. In early 2019, as the investigation neared its end, a Democratic aide on the committee acknowledged to CNN that it had “not uncovered direct evidence of collusion.”
The Senate committee itself has also had a direct role in the selective leaks that fueled the collusion narrative. In 2018, James Wolfe — the SSCI’s longtime director of security – was convicted of lying to the FBI about his contacts with journalists about classified information before the committee. Wolfe had a romantic relationship with one of those reporters, Ali Watkins, now at the New York Times, who wrote a story for BuzzFeed about Carter Page’s contacts with alleged Russian spies.
In what is perhaps a nod to the fact that its final report is heavy on speculation and light on new evidence, the SSCI opens the nearly 1,000-page document with the disclaimer that it “does not describe the final result as a complete picture.” In an addendum, five of the committee’s Democratic members note that the panel’s “power to investigate — which does not include search warrants or wiretaps — falls short of the FBI’s. So too do its staffing, resources, and technical capabilities.”
As a result, far from being treated as a breakthrough in the years-long Trump-Russia saga, the SSCI’s main contribution to the available picture is its own creative interpretation of previously known information.
Its release comes while another major investigation with far greater investigative powers is believed to be near completion. The review by U.S. Attorney John Durham into the origins of the Russia probe recently yielded its first indictment. Whether more are forthcoming or not, the innuendo that fills the Senate intelligence panel’s last word on the Russia investigation underscores that the full story has yet to be told.


thegatewaypundit--2020-09-22--Trump Bashing 2020 Emmys Show With Jimmy Kimmel Gets Lowest Ratings Ever

The 2020 Emmy Awards show took place this weekend .
If you didn ’ t watch it , you are far from alone .
The show delivered its lowest ratings ever .
Perhaps it had something to do with the constant Trump bashing and attempts to insult half of the country .
TRENDING : FBI Agent Who Uncovered Weiner Laptop with Hillary 's Emails says FBI Leadership Told Him to Erase All of His Findings The virtual 72nd Emmy Awards hosted by Jimmy Kimmel on ABC drew 6.1 million viewers , a 20 % drop compared to last year ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ A new low for the annual awards show , ” TheWrap ’ s Tony Maglio reported .
Kimmel , who hosted the awards for the third time , used his opening monologue to note how there was no audience at the Emmys this year due to the health and safety procedures in place amid the coronavirus pandemic .
“ This isn ’ t a MAGA rally , it ’ s the Emmys .
Instead of the live audience , we took a page from baseball and did cardboard cutouts of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hosted a similarly politically charged 2018 Academy Awards , which set an all-time low for the Oscars telecast .
Idiots like Kimmel still think that bashing Trump and his supporters is somehow edgy and brave .
With jokes like these it ’ s a real wonder how they lost the night .
How much worse will the ratings have to get for them to cancel the Emmys altogether ?
Keep making fun of half of the country Hollywood , and you ’ ll find out .

The 2020 Emmy Awards show took place this weekend.
If you didn’t watch it, you are far from alone. The show delivered its lowest ratings ever.
Perhaps it had something to do with the constant Trump bashing and attempts to insult half of the country.
FOX News reports:
Jimmy Kimmel’s Emmy Awards telecast plummets to record low ratings The virtual 72nd Emmy Awards hosted by Jimmy Kimmel on ABC drew 6.1 million viewers, a 20% drop compared to last year’s host-less version, according to TheWrap. “A new low for the annual awards show,” TheWrap’s Tony Maglio reported. Kimmel, who hosted the awards for the third time, used his opening monologue to note how there was no audience at the Emmys this year due to the health and safety procedures in place amid the coronavirus pandemic. “This isn’t a MAGA rally, it’s the Emmys. Instead of the live audience, we took a page from baseball and did cardboard cutouts of the nominees,” Kimmel said. Kimmel hosted a similarly politically charged 2018 Academy Awards, which set an all-time low for the Oscars telecast.
Idiots like Kimmel still think that bashing Trump and his supporters is somehow edgy and brave.
With jokes like these it’s a real wonder how they lost the night.
"Of course I'm here all alone. Of course we don't have an audience," Kimmel said. "This isn't a MAGA rally — it's the Emmys." https://t.co/lSuVCLrxSR — The Hill (@thehill) September 21, 2020
Wanna see what the end game of social justice looks like? Here’s pathetic, timid, emasculated Jimmy Kimmel clapping like a seal and repeating phrases on command like a parrot. pic.twitter.com/iVUogHTg0U — Dave Rubin (@RubinReport) September 21, 2020
Jimmy Kimmel opened the 'pand-Emmys' to a completely empty arena — watch his monologue here pic.twitter.com/FnLZvmcEaT — NowThis (@nowthisnews) September 21, 2020
How much worse will the ratings have to get for them to cancel the Emmys altogether?
Keep making fun of half of the country Hollywood, and you’ll find out.
Cross posted from American Lookout.


thegatewaypundit--2020-09-22--Senator Lindsey Graham: “We’ve Got the Votes to Confirm the Justice on the Floor of the Senate BEFOR

Senator Lindsey Graham: “We’ve Got the Votes to Confirm the Justice on the Floor of the Senate BEFORE the Election” (VIDEO)

During their discussion Graham said the Republicans have 50 votes to confirm the next Supreme Court Justice on the floor @ @ @ @ @ the November election !
Senator Cory Gardner ( R-CO ) announced Monday he would vote @ @ @ @ @ the election .
Senator Grassley from Iowa also said he would vote for a Trump @ @ @ @ @ .
Senator Graham : “ We ’ ve got the votes to confirm the Justice @ @ @ @ @ Senate BEFORE the election & that ’ s what is coming.
” TRENDING : FBI @ @ @ @ @ with Hillary 's Emails says FBI Leadership Told Him to Erase All of His Findings

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) joined Sean Hannity on Monday night.
During their discussion Graham said the Republicans have 50 votes to confirm the next Supreme Court Justice on the floor of the US Senate before the November election!
Senator Cory Gardner (R-CO) announced Monday he would vote for a GOP nominee before the election. Senator Grassley from Iowa also said he would vote for a Trump nominee for the highest court.
Senator Graham: “We’ve got the votes to confirm the Justice on the floor of the Senate BEFORE the election & that’s what is coming.”
Via The Columbia Bugle:
Senator Lindsey Graham Announcing On Hannity That They Have The Votes For Trump's SCOTUS Pick "We've got the votes to confirm the Justice on the floor of the Senate BEFORE the election & that's what is coming." pic.twitter.com/L1Nwr1wBjd — The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) September 22, 2020
More from Charlie Kirk:


thegatewaypundit--2020-09-22--King James Couldn’t “Last 10 Seconds with Me” – MMA Champ Colby Covington Doubles Down – Challenges

King James Couldn’t “Last 10 Seconds with Me” – MMA Champ Colby Covington Doubles Down – Challenges “Spineless Coward” LeBron James to Bout

THIS WAS INCREDIBLE !
WHAT A WINNER !
MMA Champion Colby Covington wearing a US flag in his post-win interview @ @ @ @ @ WENT ROGUE– Colby cheered President Trump and the Silent Majority — And warned Sleepy Joe @ @ @ @ @ !
!
Colby Covington : “ Ladies and gentleman , the silent majority is ready @ @ @ @ @ If you thought that was a beating wait until November 3rd , when Donald Trump @ @ @ @ @ Joe .
That ’ s gon na be a landslide.
” Then he went on @ @ @ @ @ James !
TRENDING : FBI Agent Who Uncovered Weiner Laptop with Hillary 's Emails says @ @ @ @ @ Erase All of His Findings On Monday Colby Covington doubled-down and challenged LeBron James to @ @ @ @ @ He wouldn ’ t last 10 seconds with me !
” Now that would be @ @ @

THIS WAS INCREDIBLE!
WHAT A WINNER!
MMA Champion Colby Covington wearing a US flag in his post-win interview, interrupted the host and WENT ROGUE– Colby cheered President Trump and the Silent Majority — And warned Sleepy Joe of what he is facing!!
Colby Covington: “Ladies and gentleman, the silent majority is ready to make some noise. If you thought that was a beating wait until November 3rd, when Donald Trump gets his hands on Sleepy Joe. That’s gonna be a landslide.”
Then he went on to SLAM spineless coward LeBron James!
Holy Smokes this was AWESOME!
CHAOS 👀🔥 “Ladies and gentleman, the silent majority is ready to make some noise. If you thought that was a beating wait until November 3rd, when Donald Trump gets his hands on Sleepy Joe. That’s gonna be a landslide.” – @ColbyCovMMA pic.twitter.com/0b518NdgV2 — Andrew Surabian (@Surabees) September 20, 2020
On Monday Colby Covington doubled-down and challenged LeBron James to a bout saying, “He wouldn’t last 10 seconds with me!”
Now that would be a sell-out!


thegatewaypundit--2020-09-23--BREAKING: Burisma Investigation to be Released within 24 Hours — FINDS BIDEN FAMILY GUILTY LIKELY CR

BREAKING: Burisma Investigation to be Released within 24 Hours — FINDS BIDEN FAMILY GUILTY LIKELY CRIMINAL ACTIONS (VIDEO)

In March Senator Ron Johnson told reporters that Senate Republicans are entering a new phase of their investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden and their ties to a corrupt Ukrainian natural gas company , Burisma .
After leaving office in 2017 , Vice President Joe Biden Bragged about strong-arming the government of Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor .
Joe Biden made the remarks during a meeting of foreign policy specialists .
Biden said he , “ Threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $ 1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees , sending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if it didn ’ t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.
” Biden suggested during his talk that Barack Obama was in on the threat .
Reporter John Solomon later revealed what Biden did not tell his audience .
Joe Biden had Shokin fired because he was investigating Joe Biden ’ s son Hunter .
TRENDING : Unhinged Quebec Woman Pascale Ferrier Identified as Suspect in Case of Ricin Letter Sent to Trump White House On Tuesday night investigative reporter John Solomon told Lou Dobbs the Burisma investigation will be released in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the expected findings in the Burisma report that is expected to be released Wednesday .
John Solomon : Here is what the report is likely to reveal .
First — The State Department under Joe Biden and Obama believed Joe Biden was engaging in a conflict of interest .
Second — The State Department detected a $ 7 million bribe being paid by Burisma , the company that hired Hunter Biden on its board .
Third — There was a pressure campaign inside the Obama State Department and inside the White House invoking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to pressure the US government to make the Burisma corruption allegations go away .
Finally — It wasn ’ t just the State Department , the Treasury Department flagged several transactions , foreign money flowing into companies connected to Hunter Biden as suspicious transactions .
This ought to be big !

In March Senator Ron Johnson told reporters that Senate Republicans are entering a new phase of their investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden and their ties to a corrupt Ukrainian natural gas company, Burisma.
After leaving office in 2017, Vice President Joe Biden Bragged about strong-arming the government of Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor.
Joe Biden made the remarks during a meeting of foreign policy specialists. Biden said he, “Threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.” Biden suggested during his talk that Barack Obama was in on the threat.
Reporter John Solomon later revealed what Biden did not tell his audience. Joe Biden had Shokin fired because he was investigating Joe Biden’s son Hunter.
On Tuesday night investigative reporter John Solomon told Lou Dobbs the Burisma investigation will be released in the next 24 hours.
John Solomon discussed the expected findings in the Burisma report that is expected to be released Wednesday.
John Solomon: Here is what the report is likely to reveal.
First — The State Department under Joe Biden and Obama believed Joe Biden was engaging in a conflict of interest.
Second — The State Department detected a $7 million bribe being paid by Burisma, the company that hired Hunter Biden on its board.
Third — There was a pressure campaign inside the Obama State Department and inside the White House invoking Hunter Biden’s name in trying to pressure the US government to make the Burisma corruption allegations go away.
Finally — It wasn’t just the State Department, the Treasury Department flagged several transactions, foreign money flowing into companies connected to Hunter Biden as suspicious transactions.
This ought to be big!
Via Lou Dobbs Tonight: