thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--Senate Intel Report: FBI’s ‘Unjustified’ Use Of Anti-Trump Dossier ‘Deeply Troubling’

The Senate Intelligence Committee has determined that the FBI gave the unverified anti-Trump dossier “ unjustified credence , ” and that Russia “ took advantage ” of members of the Trump transition team ’ s “ relative inexperience in government.
” In its final report as part of a years-long bipartisan into whether Russia sought to influence the 2016 election , the Committee found “ absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump ” colluded with Russia .
“ Over the last three years , the Senate Intelligence Committee conducted a bipartisan and thorough investigation into Russian efforts to influence the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Acting Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Marco Rubio ( R-FL ) said in a statement Tuesday .
“ We interviewed over 200 witnesses and reviewed over 1 million pages of documents.
” “ No probe into this matter has been more exhaustive , ” he added .
TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) “ We can say , without any hesitation , that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election , ” Rubio said .
“ What the Committee did find , however , is very troubling.
” Rubio said the committee ’ s found “ deeply troubling actions taken ” by the FBI , “ particularly their acceptance and willingness to rely on the ‘ Steele Dossier ’ without verifying its methodology or sourcing.
” “ The committee found that the FBI gave the dossier , authored by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele , ‘ unjustified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Steele ’ s past reporting record , ' ” Fox News reported .
The committee found that former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort ’ s “ presence on the Trump campaign and proximity to then-candidate Trump created opportunities for Russian intelligence services to exert influence over , and acquire confidential information on , the Trump campaign.
” The committee noted that prior to Manafort joining the Trump campaign in March 2016 , Manafort “ directly and indirectly communicated ” with Russian national , Konstantin Kilimnik and other pro-Russian oligarchs in Ukraine .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to secretly share internal Campaign information with Kilimnik , ” the report stated , while noting that the committee was “ unable to reliably determine why Manafort shared sensitive internal polling data or Campaign strategy with Kilimnik or with whom Kilimnik further shared that information.
” The committee noted that it had “ limited insight ” into Kilimnik ’ s communications with Manafort and into Kilimnik ’ s communications with other individuals connected to Russian influence operations , all of whom used communications security practices .
“ The Committee obtained some information suggesting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ GRU ’ s hack and leak operation targeting the 2016 U.S. election , ” the report stated .

The Senate Intelligence Committee has determined that the FBI gave the unverified anti-Trump dossier “unjustified credence,” and that Russia “took advantage” of members of the Trump transition team’s “relative inexperience in government.”
In its final report as part of a years-long bipartisan into whether Russia sought to influence the 2016 election, the Committee found “absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump” colluded with Russia.
“Over the last three years, the Senate Intelligence Committee conducted a bipartisan and thorough investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election and undermine our democracy,” Acting Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Marco Rubio (R-FL) said in a statement Tuesday. “We interviewed over 200 witnesses and reviewed over 1 million pages of documents.”
“No probe into this matter has been more exhaustive,” he added.
“We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election,” Rubio said. “What the Committee did find, however, is very troubling.”
Rubio said the committee’s found “deeply troubling actions taken” by the FBI, “particularly their acceptance and willingness to rely on the ‘Steele Dossier’ without verifying its methodology or sourcing.”
“The committee found that the FBI gave the dossier, authored by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, ‘unjustified credence, based on an incomplete understanding of Steele’s past reporting record,'” Fox News reported.
The committee found that former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s “presence on the Trump campaign and proximity to then-candidate Trump created opportunities for Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump campaign.”


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--Democrat Convention Dumpster Fire: Fake Indian Elizabeth Warren Speaks at DNC Native American Caucus

Democrat Convention Dumpster Fire: Fake Indian Elizabeth Warren Speaks at DNC Native American Caucus Meeting

You just can ’ t make this stuff up .
Fake Indian Elizabeth Warren participated in the DNC ’ s Native American Caucus meeting on Tuesday .
TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) The Commie Convention kicked off on Monday and it ’ s a total dumpster fire .
The Democrat Senator in Massachusetts lied about her Native American heritage to get ahead in life .
Warren ’ s registration card @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Warren identified as an “ American Indian.
” Elizabeth Warren has made up all kinds of elaborate stories over the years in an effort to bolster her claims she is Native American .
Warren claimed her parents had to elope because her father ’ s parents were racist and didn ’ t approve of their son ’ s Cherokee girlfriend .
Senator Warren also previously claimed her Pawpaw ’ s high cheekbones were proof she is of Native American descent .
Two years ago Elizabeth ‘ Pocahontas ’ Warren released a DNA study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That ’ s 0.0009765625 .
The average white person in America has nearly double the amount of American Indian DNA ( 0.18 % ) as Elizabeth Warren ( 0.098 % ) , who claims to be Cherokee .
But the Democrats included Elizabeth Warren as one of the participants in its Native American Caucus meeting anyway .

You just can’t make this stuff up.
Fake Indian Elizabeth Warren participated in the DNC’s Native American Caucus meeting on Tuesday.
I’m excited for the DNC Native American Caucus meeting today. Please join @Deb4CongressNM, @sharicedavids, @ewarren, and me (and whole bunch of other good folks) today! https://t.co/LLcjb6ZQJR — Peggy Flanagan (@peggyflanagan) August 18, 2020
The Commie Convention kicked off on Monday and it’s a total dumpster fire.
The Democrat Senator in Massachusetts lied about her Native American heritage to get ahead in life.
Warren’s registration card for the State Bar of Texas revealed Warren identified as an “American Indian.”
Elizabeth Warren has made up all kinds of elaborate stories over the years in an effort to bolster her claims she is Native American.
Warren claimed her parents had to elope because her father’s parents were racist and didn’t approve of their son’s Cherokee girlfriend.
Senator Warren also previously claimed her Pawpaw’s high cheekbones were proof she is of Native American descent.
It’s all a lie. She’s a complete fraud.
Two years ago Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren released a DNA study that claimed she is 1/1,024 Native America. That’s 0.0009765625.
The average white person in America has nearly double the amount of American Indian DNA (0.18%) as Elizabeth Warren (0.098%), who claims to be Cherokee.
But the Democrats included Elizabeth Warren as one of the participants in its Native American Caucus meeting anyway.


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--S&P 500 Hits New High Today – The US Is In Its Greatest Stock Market Increase in History

We are in the greatest recovery in US history right now .
The statistics are record breaking !
We previously reported that the St Louis FRED reported that July ’ s Unemployment was down nearly 5 % since the economy collapsed as a result of the intentional shut down due to the China coronavirus .
The unemployment rate reached 14.8 % and now it is down to 10.2 % : The FRED also reported that there are now 139.6 million Americans working .
In April the FRED reported that there were only 130.3 working Americans .
This increase in working @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shattering .
Nearly 10 million more people are working now than in April .
The total number of Americans working is now more than any month since September 2014 and before : TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) Today the S & P 500 closed at 3,389 – a new all-time high .
Housing starts are up more than 22 % in July over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up to all-time highs or near all time highs since the markets reached their peaks in February this year !
The markets have never grown so much in such a short period of time .
NEVER !
This is record breaking !
Overall , more new jobs were created in the past three months than any time in history and the markets have grown more in the past three months than any time in history .
This is the greatest recovery ever !

We are in the greatest recovery in US history right now. The statistics are record breaking!
We previously reported that the St Louis FRED reported that July’s Unemployment was down nearly 5% since the economy collapsed as a result of the intentional shut down due to the China coronavirus. The unemployment rate reached 14.8% and now it is down to 10.2%:
The FRED also reported that there are now 139.6 million Americans working. In April the FRED reported that there were only 130.3 working Americans. This increase in working Americans in only three months is record shattering. Nearly 10 million more people are working now than in April. The total number of Americans working is now more than any month since September 2014 and before:
Today the S&P 500 closed at 3,389 – a new all-time high. Housing starts are up more than 22% in July over June. All the markets are now up to all-time highs or near all time highs since the markets reached their peaks in February this year!
The markets have never grown so much in such a short period of time. NEVER! This is record breaking!
Overall, more new jobs were created in the past three months than any time in history and the markets have grown more in the past three months than any time in history. This is the greatest recovery ever!


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--IMPORTANT: Doctor’s Forum on HCQ Fights Back Against Facebook — Obliterates Garbage ‘Fact-Check’ Sit

IMPORTANT: Doctor’s Forum on HCQ Fights Back Against Facebook — Obliterates Garbage ‘Fact-Check’ Site on Deeply Flawed Analysis that Has Killed Thousands

At some point the people in America and the world will wake up and see they were lied to about the coronavirus and its treatment .
And at some point the so-called experts and their supporters will be held to account .
As The Gateway Pundit reported earlier .
The latest international analysis of hydroxychloroquine treatment on the coronavirus shows countries that endorsed early use of the drug had a 77.4 % lower mortality rate than countries that banned the use of the safe malaria drug .
This means that Dr. Fauci , Dr. Birx , the CDC , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ giants have been pushing a complete lie with deadly consequences !
TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) That could have been lowered , by possibly tens of thousands of lives , if HCQ use would have been promoted in the United States .
As a result of Dr. Fauci ’ s lies the US has a worse coronavirus record than numerous third world countries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compiled all of this international data .
Even developing nations Ukraine , Greece , Cuba , Morocco , Indonesia and Algeria fared better than the US under Dr. Fauci !
To this day Dr. Fauci , Dr. Birx , the CDC and the FDA refuse to promote the use of HCQ in the early treatment of hydroxychloroquine .
After TGP posted this information Facebook started banning and deleting the information .
Facebook based their response on the garbage “ fact check ” website “ Health Feedback ” and their highly flawed reporting .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trial and they obliterated the bogus report by “ Health Feedback.
” This was a methodical take-down of a very corrupt group used by Facebook to shut down life-saving reporting on the coronavirus .
Incorrectly claims that we assume all individuals in treatment countries are treated .
We don ’ t .
Anyone reading as far as the second sentence of the paper will know this .
For the analysis to be useful , we only need to know that usage is significantly higher in treatment countries , which is supported by hundreds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clearly not in either group .
Authors did not read the paper .
They claim cherry picking for Brazil , Spain , and Italy .
However , the study compares countries that made clear decisions for the majority of their outbreak .
Brazil , for example , started usage relatively late and has increasing but very mixed use .
Extensive supporting references are provided in the Appendix .
Authors are correct that Indonesia should have been excluded ( this has been corrected ) .
Baseless claims of misprepresention of other clinical trials .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ claim in our paper , while misrepresenting our study and other studies themselves .
It is true that a few studies have claims unsupported by the data , which we note .
Interestingly , authors here appear to believe that certain studies could not have any errors , a standard which is apparently selectively applied to benefit their conclusion .
False analysis claims .
“ The authors made all of their calculations using the sample size of 2.7 billion people , based on the population sizes of countries in both groups , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conclusions they drew from them.
” Nothing about this is correct .
The entire population is used in only one instance , where we present the relative risk for the entire population in each group ( which is approximately the same as when averaging across countries ) .

You can’t hide the truth forever.
At some point the people in America and the world will wake up and see they were lied to about the coronavirus and its treatment.
And at some point the so-called experts and their supporters will be held to account.
As The Gateway Pundit reported earlier.
The latest international analysis of hydroxychloroquine treatment on the coronavirus shows countries that endorsed early use of the drug had a 77.4% lower mortality rate than countries that banned the use of the safe malaria drug.
This means that Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx, the CDC, the liberal fake news media and the tech giants have been pushing a complete lie with deadly consequences!
America has lost (reportedly) over 150,000 lives.
That could have been lowered, by possibly tens of thousands of lives, if HCQ use would have been promoted in the United States.
As a result of Dr. Fauci’s lies the US has a worse coronavirus record than numerous third world countries.
Here is the website that has compiled all of this international data.
Even developing nations Ukraine, Greece, Cuba, Morocco, Indonesia and Algeria fared better than the US under Dr. Fauci!
To this day Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx, the CDC and the FDA refuse to promote the use of HCQ in the early treatment of hydroxychloroquine.
* * * * * * * * * * *
After TGP posted this information Facebook started banning and deleting the information.
Facebook based their response on the garbage “fact check” website “Health Feedback” and their highly flawed reporting.
On Monday we reached out to HCQ Trial and they obliterated the bogus report by “Health Feedback.”
This was a methodical take-down of a very corrupt group used by Facebook to shut down life-saving reporting on the coronavirus.
Via HCQ Trial:
Clearly biased review. Double quotes around “analysis” and “study” show the authors’ bias.
Did not (and have not) contacted us. Authors have never contacted us, questioning their interest in accurate reporting.
Incorrectly claims that we assume all individuals in treatment countries are treated. We don’t. Anyone reading as far as the second sentence of the paper will know this. For the analysis to be useful, we only need to know that usage is significantly higher in treatment countries, which is supported by hundreds of references.
Claims 100% adherence in RCTs. Claims that 100% adherence is required in an RCT, however imperfect adherence is common. For example, adherence in the NEJM PEP study was 75%.
Claims cherry-picking on countries clearly not in either group. Authors did not read the paper. They claim cherry picking for Brazil, Spain, and Italy. However, the study compares countries that made clear decisions for the majority of their outbreak. Brazil, for example, started usage relatively late and has increasing but very mixed use. Extensive supporting references are provided in the Appendix. Authors are correct that Indonesia should have been excluded (this has been corrected).
Incorrectly claims we stated HCQ was 100% effective. We never stated this, and it makes no sense. While at this time, 100% of papers in certain categories present positive results, we very clearly state that the nature and degree of these results varies widely.
Baseless claims of misprepresention of other clinical trials. Authors provide no details of any incorrect claim in our paper, while misrepresenting our study and other studies themselves. It is true that a few studies have claims unsupported by the data, which we note. Interestingly, authors here appear to believe that certain studies could not have any errors, a standard which is apparently selectively applied to benefit their conclusion.
Authors cherry-pick 5 of over 70 studies. Authors cherry-pick 5 studies to support their claim of inefficacy, neglecting to mention the other 65+ studies, and neglecting to mention that every one of the 5 they cite is discussed in detail in our paper (and we reference all of the 65+ other studies as well).
This site has cherry-picked and misrepresented research in the past. We note this site has a history of cherry-picking and misrepresenting research in this area, see We note this site has a history of cherry-picking and misrepresenting research in this area, see [this report] for example, where authors conveniently cherry pick less than one third of studies supporting their conclusion, and claim flaws in studies not supporting their conclusion, while ignoring flaws in studies supporting their conclusion. For example, authors say one study “concluded that HCQ did not prevent COVID-19 infection within four days after exposure”, however the treatment in that study (an Internet survey RCT) was not even administered within four days – medication was actually shipped to patients, and shipping was not done over the weekend. It appears unlikely that authors read the studies they are using. In another example they note a trial of “mild to moderate” patients showing no improvement, while neglecting to mention that “mild to moderate” in this study refers to hospitalized patients with 14% randomized in the ICU, and neglecting to mention the very late treatment.
Claims intense debate on safety. While debate continues on efficacy, the majority of those closely following the research (on both sides) agree that early safety concerns (largely from the retracted Lancet study), were unfounded and not supported by subsequent trials, especially for early treatment.
Relies on Twitter personalities. Authors refer to extremely inaccurate analysis from an extremely biased Twitter personality. See our Authors refer to extremely inaccurate analysis from an extremely biased Twitter personality. See our response
Random claims about connections. They make random claims about connections with other Twitter accounts because they were referenced as providing feedback, an implied ad hominem attack.
False analysis claims. “The authors made all of their calculations using the sample size of 2.7 billion people, based on the population sizes of countries in both groups, which invalidates all their statistical analyses and the conclusions they drew from them.” Nothing about this is correct. The entire population is used in only one instance, where we present the relative risk for the entire population in each group (which is approximately the same as when averaging across countries).
Claims a sample size of 19. The number of deaths alone in the countries analyzed is over 300,000.
Claims missing details with no examples. However, this is a very simple analysis and we believe that all data and details to reproduce the results are provided.
Incorrectly claims IFR should be used. Authors apparently did not read the paper which explains why case statistics are not reliable.
Incorrectly claims not a randomized clinical trial. Indeed, it’s not a clinical trial, but we have never said it is. Authors are confusing “clinical” with “controlled”. It’s a trial – a medication is certainly being trialed. It’s controlled – there is a control group. It’s randomized – the group a person gets is random and chosen in advance, independent of their medical status or the membership of the other group (in contrast to a retrospective observational study). Irrelevent ecological fallacy discussion. Claims ecological fallacy (you cannot directly infer the properties of individuals from the average of a group), however the study does not do this.
Claims “observational ecological analysis”. However this is a prospective study – assignments were done in advance, a person’s assigment was random, independent of their medical status, and there is a control group.
Ignores adjustments. Authors note the demographic differences between countries, failing to note that we actually adjust for these.
Claims “numerous large and robust clinical trials which suggest no beneficial effect of hydroxychloroquine treatment in COVID-19 patients”. While there are negative trials for late stage treatment, all trials concerning early treatment are either positive or inconclusive.


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--Democrat Convention Week: DNC LGBTQ Caucus Member Says: ‘We’re Talking About Abolishing Police, Abol

Democrat Convention Week: DNC LGBTQ Caucus Member Says: ‘We’re Talking About Abolishing Police, Abolishing ICE and Abolishing Prisons’ (VIDEO)

It ’ s Democrat convention week and the radical Marxist wing of the party has completely taken over .
The @ @ @ @ @ they are neo-Marxists .
Democrats spent the last month denying their unhinged party wants to @ @ @ @ @ Tuesday , Democrats in a virtual LGBTQ Caucus meeting straight up called for prisons , @ @ @ @ @ abolished .
TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
@ @ @ @ @ Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( @ @ @ @ @ re talking about abolishing the police , we ’ re talking about abolishing ICE , @ @ @ @ @ about abolishing prisons .
”

It’s Democrat convention week and the radical Marxist wing of the party has completely taken over.
The Democrats are now openly admitting they are neo-Marxists.
Democrats spent the last month denying their unhinged party wants to abolish the police.
On Tuesday, Democrats in a virtual LGBTQ Caucus meeting straight up called for prisons, police and ICE to be abolished.
“We’re talking about abolishing the police, we’re talking about abolishing ICE, and we’re talking about abolishing prisons.”
WATCH:


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--Terrific! New Documentary on Russiagate Scandal Against President Trump in the Works — PREVIEW VIDEO

Terrific! New Documentary on Russiagate Scandal Against President Trump in the Works — PREVIEW VIDEO IS AMAZING!

Amanda Milius , daughter of legendary screenwriter-director John Milius , has directed The Plot Against the President , based on Lee Smith ’ s 2019 best-seller of the same name .
The documentary has been filmed in private and includes such conservative luminaries as Rudy Giuliani , John Solomon , Corey Lewandowski , Roger Stone , Sidney Powell , Mike Cernovich , Kim Guilfoyle and Donald Trump Jr .
The film , the first of its kind , exposes and explains the attempted coup against President Donald Trump by Democrats , the fake news media , James Comey ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The trailer was released and it is INCREDIBLE !
TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) There ’ s a hush-hush Russiagate documentary on the horizon from a director who hails from Hollywood royalty .
But this one makes the case for President Trump .
Amanda Milius , daughter of legendary screenwriter-director John Milius and a State Department alum , has directed The Plot Against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s 2019 best-seller of the same name .
Milius , who optioned the book in manuscript form last summer and stepped down in early March from her post as the deputy assistant secretary for content in the State Department ’ s Bureau of Global Public Affairs , began working on the doc in secrecy shortly thereafter .
Over the past three months , she interviewed Russiagate critics including Rep. Devin Nunes , Donald Trump Jr. , Rudy Giuliani , Kimberly Guilfoyle , Mike Cernovich and Roger Stone as well as Gen. Michael @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Milius ’ father , the screenwriter of such classics as Apocalypse Now and Dirty Harry , is such a larger-than-life figure in Hollywood that he has inspired characters in at least two films : The Big Lebowski ( played by John Goodman ) and Zeroville ( Seth Rogen ) .
His politics have long deviated from the industry ’ s centrist Democratic leanings ( he and Charlton Heston served on the board of the NRA at the same time ) .
Amanda , who attended USC ’ s School of Cinematic Arts and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decade , shares his pro-Trump sentiments .
“ Weirdly , I ’ ve had random people in and out of L.A. claim my father somehow got me my job in politics when I began working for the administration , which is really odd , ” she tells THR .
“ I never got accused of nepotism in Hollywood , which is where it lives , you ’ d think .
But that ’ s definitely not what happened .
I walked into a campaign office and volunteered .
My dad is not buddies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But they don ’ t know each other .
Though they would absolutely get along .
Actually , my dad would make a great defense secretary .
Full Dr. Strangelove energy.
” The elder Milius wasn ’ t involved in Plot Against the President , but his daughter says he ’ s excited to see it and is “ very obsessed with the story as it unfolds in the news.
” The film was financed by a handful of private investors that the Washington-based director declines to name .
She produced alongside @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wollman Prods .
and 1AMDC Prods .
The producers are currently in talks with a few distributors and are planning an Oct. 1 release in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election .
Milius says the film will offer several additional bombshells that weren ’ t included in the book , whose thesis is that a coup was engineered by the American establishment elite , including the media , and targeted the president as well as the democratic process .
( The author is a Middle East correspondent for The Weekly Standard .
@

Amanda Milius, daughter of legendary screenwriter-director John Milius, has directed The Plot Against the President, based on Lee Smith’s 2019 best-seller of the same name.
The documentary has been filmed in private and includes such conservative luminaries as Rudy Giuliani, John Solomon, Corey Lewandowski, Roger Stone, Sidney Powell, Mike Cernovich, Kim Guilfoyle and Donald Trump Jr.
The film, the first of its kind, exposes and explains the attempted coup against President Donald Trump by Democrats, the fake news media, James Comey’s FBI and the Obama deep state.
The trailer was released and it is INCREDIBLE!
Trailer For The New Pro-Trump Russiagate Documentary: The Plot Against The President pic.twitter.com/12Nl9yUfxg — The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) August 18, 2020
Via The Hollywood Reporter:
There’s a hush-hush Russiagate documentary on the horizon from a director who hails from Hollywood royalty. But this one makes the case for President Trump. Amanda Milius, daughter of legendary screenwriter-director John Milius and a State Department alum, has directed The Plot Against the President, based on Lee Smith’s 2019 best-seller of the same name. Milius, who optioned the book in manuscript form last summer and stepped down in early March from her post as the deputy assistant secretary for content in the State Department’s Bureau of Global Public Affairs, began working on the doc in secrecy shortly thereafter. Over the past three months, she interviewed Russiagate critics including Rep. Devin Nunes, Donald Trump Jr., Rudy Giuliani, Kimberly Guilfoyle, Mike Cernovich and Roger Stone as well as Gen. Michael Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell. Milius’ father, the screenwriter of such classics as Apocalypse Now and Dirty Harry, is such a larger-than-life figure in Hollywood that he has inspired characters in at least two films: The Big Lebowski (played by John Goodman) and Zeroville (Seth Rogen). His politics have long deviated from the industry’s centrist Democratic leanings (he and Charlton Heston served on the board of the NRA at the same time). Amanda, who attended USC’s School of Cinematic Arts and worked in the film industry for a decade, shares his pro-Trump sentiments. “Weirdly, I’ve had random people in and out of L.A. claim my father somehow got me my job in politics when I began working for the administration, which is really odd,” she tells THR. “I never got accused of nepotism in Hollywood, which is where it lives, you’d think. But that’s definitely not what happened. I walked into a campaign office and volunteered. My dad is not buddies with the president. He loves him. But they don’t know each other. Though they would absolutely get along. Actually, my dad would make a great defense secretary. Full Dr. Strangelove energy.” The elder Milius wasn’t involved in Plot Against the President, but his daughter says he’s excited to see it and is “very obsessed with the story as it unfolds in the news.” The film was financed by a handful of private investors that the Washington-based director declines to name. She produced alongside Jonathan Eisenman. The production companies are Wollman Prods. and 1AMDC Prods. The producers are currently in talks with a few distributors and are planning an Oct. 1 release in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election. Milius says the film will offer several additional bombshells that weren’t included in the book, whose thesis is that a coup was engineered by the American establishment elite, including the media, and targeted the president as well as the democratic process. (The author is a Middle East correspondent for The Weekly Standard.)
Read the rest here.


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--Portland Police Announce Manhunt for Marquise Love in Brutal Attack on Driver Pulled From Pickup by

Portland Police Announce Manhunt for Marquise Love in Brutal Attack on Driver Pulled From Pickup by Antifa and Black Lives Matter Thugs

Portland , Oregon police announced Tuesday they have identified Marquise Love as a suspect in the brutal attack on Adam Haner Sunday night in Portland .
Haner crashed his pickup truck while trying to flee violent Antifa and Black Lives Matter thugs who then pulled him out of his truck , beating and kicking him until Love kicked him upside the head and knocked him out cold .
Love was sussed out by 4Chan posters who noted he goes by Keese Love .
TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) Police , who have not named the victim , said he is out of the hospital and is recovering .
TGP reported earlier Tuesday the victim ’ s brother , Brian Haner named him and started a GoFundMe for his brother , Adam .
Brian posted a photo of his brother home sleeping , but showing a black eye and swollen face .
Portland police are also looking for the trans woman whom Adam Haner was seen assisting shortly before he was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contact Love and about the spreading of incorrect information .
The Portland airport said Monday that Love has not worked there for years and was never a security officer there .
Yesterday , the Portland Police Bureau ( PPB ) began investigation of an assault that occurred in the downtown area where an adult male associated to a white pick-up truck was violently assaulted .
Investigators positively identified the suspect as 25 year-old Marquise Love .
Investigators made attempts to contact Love but could not locate him .
Investigators have left messages for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continue to look for him as there is probable cause for his arrest .
PPB Investigators have been made aware of attempts by members of the public to contact Love after possible personal information was posted online .
Investigators urge the public to not do this as it can be dangerous .
Also , the information circulating on social media is not always accurate .
Other reports around social media claim that the victim in this case is not recovering or has succumbed to the injuries .
These reports are false .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and is recovering .
Investigators are still trying to locate a transgender female who had some of her things stolen in the area of Southwest Taylor and 4th Ave , the location where this incident began .
That person has not been contacted and their identity is unknown .
Investigators would like to speak to this person .
Anyone with information about this incident is asked to call Detective Brent Christensen at 503-823-2087 or at [ email protected ] PPB understands the high public interest in cases such as these .
The release @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the public would like .
Social media platforms make it quick to circulate information but investigators often need to make other connections not seen in videos .
Investigators need to protect the integrity of the cases they are assigned in order to present the best case to prosecutors and sometimes an early release of unverified information can hinder that process .
“ The Portland Police Bureau is taking this assault and other incidents of violence extremely seriously , ” said Chief Lovell .
“ Our Detectives continue to investigate this assault as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ toward protestors , but we need more than just videos from social media .
In order to hold individuals responsible for criminal acts , we need the public to provide information and refrain from tampering with evidence.
” …Anyone with information about this incident is asked to call Detective Brent Christensen at 503-823-2087 or at Brent .
[ email protected ]

Portland, Oregon police announced Tuesday they have identified Marquise Love as a suspect in the brutal attack on Adam Haner Sunday night in Portland. Haner crashed his pickup truck while trying to flee violent Antifa and Black Lives Matter thugs who then pulled him out of his truck, beating and kicking him until Love kicked him upside the head and knocked him out cold. Love was sussed out by 4Chan posters who noted he goes by Keese Love.
Marquise Love, wanted photo released by Portland police.
#BLM & #antifa militants violently assault man after car accident in downtown Portland. This kick to the head came after several heavy blows from fists. pic.twitter.com/pyLWFOniSF — Kalen’s old account (@fromkalen_old) August 17, 2020
Police, who have not named the victim, said he is out of the hospital and is recovering.
TGP reported earlier Tuesday the victim’s brother, Brian Haner named him and started a GoFundMe for his brother, Adam. Brian posted a photo of his brother home sleeping, but showing a black eye and swollen face.
Portland police are also looking for the trans woman whom Adam Haner was seen assisting shortly before he was attacked.
Police cautioned against trying to contact Love and about the spreading of incorrect information.
The Portland airport said Monday that Love has not worked there for years and was never a security officer there.
The individual you reference does not work at PDX and has not for a number of years. The individual was also not employed as a security officer when he worked at the airport. — flypdx (@flypdx) August 17, 2020
Statement by police:


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--Biden Repeatedly Forgets He Was First Inaugurated as VP in 2009: “January of 2018… I Mean Excuse Me

Biden Repeatedly Forgets He Was First Inaugurated as VP in 2009: “January of 2018… I Mean Excuse Me 2012” (VIDEO)

What is wrong with Joe Biden ?
77-year-old Joe Biden on Tuesday held a virtual “ Grassroots Fest ” fundraiser @ @ @ @ @ convention week with actor Tom Hanks and other Hollywood elitists .
Joe Biden repeatedly forgot @ @ @ @ @ vice president in 2009 .
“ January of 2018…I mean excuse me 2012 , ” @ @ @ @ @ looked like he was going to pass out from boredom .
TRENDING : `` This @ @ @ @ @ 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown @ @ @ @ @ Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) Biden spoke gibberish as he talked about the good @ @ @ @ @ public defender .

What is wrong with Joe Biden?
77-year-old Joe Biden on Tuesday held a virtual “Grassroots Fest” fundraiser in the middle of Dem convention week with actor Tom Hanks and other Hollywood elitists.
Joe Biden repeatedly forgot he was first inaugurated as vice president in 2009.
“January of 2018…I mean excuse me 2012,” Biden said as Tom Hanks looked like he was going to pass out from boredom.
Biden spoke gibberish as he talked about the good old days of being a public defender.
WATCH:


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--“You Don’t Have a Great Reputation” – SICK — Anderson Cooper Calls Trump-Supporter Mike Lindell a “S

“You Don’t Have a Great Reputation” – SICK — Anderson Cooper Calls Trump-Supporter Mike Lindell a “Snake Oil Salesman” in Grotesque Attack (VIDEO)

This is CNN .
Anderson Cooper invited Trump-supporting business owner Mike Lindell on his show last night and spent the entire segment attacking him .
Mike Lindell is the owner of My Pillow USA and a staunch Trump supporter .
Cooper attacked Lindell for promoting a drug Mike believes fights the China coronavirus .
Mike Lindell promotes oleandrin that has proven successful in a lab .
So Cooper attacked the idea .
Cooper said to Mike Lindell , “ You ’ re not a scientist.
” Either is Anderson Cooper .
TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) During the segment Cooper accused Mike Lindell of being a snake-oil salesman .
He then attacked Lindell for having a bad rating with the Better Business Bureau .
This was after Mike Lindell came under attack by leftists who ruined his name online after he openly supported President Donald Trump .
Mike Lindell is not surprisingly a victim of Democrat dirty tricks .
Anyone who sticks their head up gets their throat slit .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the interview .

This is CNN.
Anderson Cooper invited Trump-supporting business owner Mike Lindell on his show last night and spent the entire segment attacking him.
Mike Lindell is the owner of My Pillow USA and a staunch Trump supporter.
Cooper attacked Lindell for promoting a drug Mike believes fights the China coronavirus.
Mike Lindell promotes oleandrin that has proven successful in a lab.
So Cooper attacked the idea.
Cooper said to Mike Lindell, “You’re not a scientist.”
Either is Anderson Cooper.
During the segment Cooper accused Mike Lindell of being a snake-oil salesman.
He then attacked Lindell for having a bad rating with the Better Business Bureau. This was after Mike Lindell came under attack by leftists who ruined his name online after he openly supported President Donald Trump.
Mike Lindell is not surprisingly a victim of Democrat dirty tricks. Anyone who sticks their head up gets their throat slit.
Mike Lindell was no wilting flower during the interview.
CNN should suspend Anderson Cooper immediately.


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--“This is a Warning For What’s Coming!” – Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Loc

“This is a Warning For What’s Coming!” – Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice (VIDEO)

A veteran and business owner living in Shasta County , California is completely fed up with the authoritarian Covid lockdown orders so he gave a stern warning to the Board of Supervisors .
Residents and business owners last week held a rally outside of the Board of Supervisors chamber and demanded Shasta County re-open and lift its ridiculous mask mandate .
Shasta County officials however pointed the finger at Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom .
“ Our local health officer has not made any restrictions over and above what the state of California has , so we are doing all that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ open as possible , ” Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency Director Donnell Ewert said , according to Redding.com .
“ We are one of roughly 20 counties that still are not on the ( state ) monitoring list…so Shasta County is open ; it is , again , in the category of most open counties in California.
” TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Coronavirus in the Northern California county so the residents have had it with the tyranny .
More than 80 citizens spoke last week asking the Board of Supervisors to open up Shasta County , but one business owner stood out for his bravery and stern warning to the tyrants .
Carlos Zapata warned the masked officials in the Board of Supervisors chamber that a revolution is brewing .
“ At first we sat as concerned citizens….as we realized that [ Covid ] is not as quite as dangerous as we thought it would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the cowardice — and you guys are sitting here with your masks on — I don ’ t blame you for wearing masks because I would be hiding my face if I was you for what you ’ re doing , ” Zapata said .
He continued , “ I ’ m a business owner and I ’ m telling you , our families are starving — you guys can sit here with your jobs — you ’ re gon na sit here and get paid to fall asleep in your chair like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mask right there.
” Zapata then put the officials on notice .
“ Right now we ’ re being peaceful and you better be happy we ’ re good citizens , that we ’ re peaceful citizens but it ’ s not gon na be peaceful much longer — and this isn ’ t a threat — I ’ m not a criminal , I ’ ve never been a criminal but I ’ m telling you real good citizens are going to turn into real concerned and revolutionary citizens real soon .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that .
I ’ m probably the only person that has the balls to say what I ’ m saying right now.
” “ We ’ re building and we ’ re organizing and we ’ ll work with law enforcement or without law enforcement but you won ’ t stop us when the time comes because our families are starving !
” he said .
“ This is a warning for what ’ s coming because it ’ s not going to be peaceful for much longer !
It ’ s gon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adding he went to war for this country and he ’ s ready to fight for this country even if it ’ s against its own citizens .

A veteran and business owner living in Shasta County, California is completely fed up with the authoritarian Covid lockdown orders so he gave a stern warning to the Board of Supervisors.
Residents and business owners last week held a rally outside of the Board of Supervisors chamber and demanded Shasta County re-open and lift its ridiculous mask mandate.
Shasta County officials however pointed the finger at Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom.
“Our local health officer has not made any restrictions over and above what the state of California has, so we are doing all that we can to keep the county as open as possible,” Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency Director Donnell Ewert said, according to Redding.com. “We are one of roughly 20 counties that still are not on the (state) monitoring list…so Shasta County is open; it is, again, in the category of most open counties in California.”
Ten people have died from Coronavirus in the Northern California county so the residents have had it with the tyranny.
More than 80 citizens spoke last week asking the Board of Supervisors to open up Shasta County, but one business owner stood out for his bravery and stern warning to the tyrants.
Carlos Zapata warned the masked officials in the Board of Supervisors chamber that a revolution is brewing.
“At first we sat as concerned citizens….as we realized that [Covid] is not as quite as dangerous as we thought it would be, I was absolutely appalled at the cowardice — and you guys are sitting here with your masks on — I don’t blame you for wearing masks because I would be hiding my face if I was you for what you’re doing,” Zapata said.
He continued, “I’m a business owner and I’m telling you, our families are starving — you guys can sit here with your jobs — you’re gonna sit here and get paid to fall asleep in your chair like that gentleman’s doing behind his mask right there.”
Zapata then put the officials on notice.
“Right now we’re being peaceful and you better be happy we’re good citizens, that we’re peaceful citizens but it’s not gonna be peaceful much longer — and this isn’t a threat — I’m not a criminal, I’ve never been a criminal but I’m telling you real good citizens are going to turn into real concerned and revolutionary citizens real soon. And nobody else is gonna say that. I’m probably the only person that has the balls to say what I’m saying right now.”
“We’re building and we’re organizing and we’ll work with law enforcement or without law enforcement but you won’t stop us when the time comes because our families are starving!” he said.
“This is a warning for what’s coming because it’s not going to be peaceful for much longer! It’s gonna get real!” Zapata said adding he went to war for this country and he’s ready to fight for this country even if it’s against its own citizens.
WATCH:


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--BREAKING: Bill Clinton Pictured Getting Neck Massage From Epstein Victim, ‘Would You Mind Giving it

BREAKING: Bill Clinton Pictured Getting Neck Massage From Epstein Victim, ‘Would You Mind Giving it a Crack?’

Pictures of former President Bill Clinton getting a neck massage from Jeffrey Epstein ’ s victim have surfaced .
The Daily Mail exclusively obtained photos of Slick Willie enjoying a neck massage from 22-year-old massage therapist , Chauntae Davies .
Clinton was reportedly complaining of a stiff neck after falling asleep on Epstein ’ s private jet dubbed “ Lolita Express ” during a ‘ humanitarian ’ trip to Africa in 2002 .
Clinton reportedly said to the massage therapist , ‘ Would you mind giving it a crack ?
’ TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) Bill Clinton is seen with a satisfied smile as he leans back to enjoy a neck massage from a Jeffrey Epstein victim in never-before-seen photographs obtained exclusively by DailyMail.com .
The pictures emerged as Clinton is set to make a rallying speech in support of Joe Biden at the Democratic convention on Tuesday night .
In the photos , the former President sits comfortably and laughs as Chauntae Davies , then a 22-year-old massage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ personal masseuse , rubs her hands into his shoulders to get out the kinks in his neck .
Clinton , then 56 , had complained of having a stiff neck after falling asleep on Epstein ’ s infamous private jet , nicknamed The Lolita Express , while on a humanitarian trip with the pedophile to Africa in September of 2002 .
Epstein ’ s accused madam Ghislaine Maxwell , who is now in prison on sex trafficking charges , repeatedly encouraged Davies to give Clinton a massage while the group was refueling at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in from New York .
After Maxwell ’ s insistence , Clinton asked the twenty-something : ‘ Would you mind giving it a crack ?
’ Last month a judge unsealed Ghislaine Maxwell documents revealing a witness spotted Bill Clinton on Epstein ’ s St. James Island with two young girls .
Epstein ’ s pimp , Ghislaine Maxwell is currently in federal custody awaiting trial .
A witness interview revealed Bill Clinton was at Epstein ’ s pedophile island with Jeffrey Epstein , Ghislaine Maxwell and “ 2 young girls.
” Clinton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been to Epstein ’ s pedophile island .

Photos via The Daily Mail
Pictures of former President Bill Clinton getting a neck massage from Jeffrey Epstein’s victim have surfaced.
The Daily Mail exclusively obtained photos of Slick Willie enjoying a neck massage from 22-year-old massage therapist, Chauntae Davies.
Clinton was reportedly complaining of a stiff neck after falling asleep on Epstein’s private jet dubbed “Lolita Express” during a ‘humanitarian’ trip to Africa in 2002.
Clinton reportedly said to the massage therapist, ‘Would you mind giving it a crack?’
The Daily Mail reported:
Bill Clinton is seen with a satisfied smile as he leans back to enjoy a neck massage from a Jeffrey Epstein victim in never-before-seen photographs obtained exclusively by DailyMail.com. The pictures emerged as Clinton is set to make a rallying speech in support of Joe Biden at the Democratic convention on Tuesday night. In the photos, the former President sits comfortably and laughs as Chauntae Davies, then a 22-year-old massage therapist who acted as Epstein’s personal masseuse, rubs her hands into his shoulders to get out the kinks in his neck. Clinton, then 56, had complained of having a stiff neck after falling asleep on Epstein’s infamous private jet, nicknamed The Lolita Express, while on a humanitarian trip with the pedophile to Africa in September of 2002. Epstein’s accused madam Ghislaine Maxwell, who is now in prison on sex trafficking charges, repeatedly encouraged Davies to give Clinton a massage while the group was refueling at a small airport in Portugal after flying in from New York. After Maxwell’s insistence, Clinton asked the twenty-something: ‘Would you mind giving it a crack?’
Last month a judge unsealed Ghislaine Maxwell documents revealing a witness spotted Bill Clinton on Epstein’s St. James Island with two young girls.
Epstein’s pimp, Ghislaine Maxwell is currently in federal custody awaiting trial.
A witness interview revealed Bill Clinton was at Epstein’s pedophile island with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and “2 young girls.”
Clinton released a statement claiming he has never been to Epstein’s pedophile island.


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Roger Stone on Why He Decided to Drop His Appeal of the Unjust Conviction in the

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Roger Stone on Why He Decided to Drop His Appeal of the Unjust Conviction in the Mueller Witch Hunt

On the strong advice of my attorneys and after giving the decision considerable thought , I have reluctantly decided to dismiss the appeal of what I believe to be a wrongful conviction in a trial tainted by judicial bias , egregious and blatant juror bias and misconduct and prosecutorial misconduct .
Therefore , I directed my attorneys to withdraw my appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C .
Circuit .
I Could Never Get a Fair Hearing Before this Court of Appeals , Given its Political Agenda TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) First , I have come to the firm conclusion based on their previous actions in my case to date and based on their recent actions in the Flynn case , that it would be impossible for me to ever get a fair hearing from this appellate court for the vitally important , fundamental constitutional issues my case raises .
Although I believe the gag order issued in my case was patently unconstitutional and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Mandamus with the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C .
Circuit , by one of the most prominent First Amendment lawyers in the country were fairly straightforward , the Court waited many weeks before granting the Government ’ s request for more time .
During this time , while the Washington Post ( the dominant newspaper in the jurisdiction from which the jury was selected ) as well as CNN , MSNBC and others attacked me with falsehoods , I was prohibited from responding .
Let there be no doubt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I sustained serious damage .
The Appeals Court after an unreasonable delay , took no action but rather sent the decision back to Judge Berman Jackson , as if there was any possibility that she would vacate her own order .
I also base this conclusion on other recent developments .
After I filed my appeal , I sought a simple sixty-day extension of time to report to prison based on the COVID-19 pandemic and the very real risk of death based on my age and health I faced at the facility to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That risk was demonstrated by undisputed medical evidence and reports of a rapidly burgeoning COVID-19 positive population at the facility .
The Justice Department had a uniform policy of consenting to such extensions in every other case , and judges in DC and around the country had ordered such extensions routinely for every other defendant who had yet to report .
Notwithstanding this undisputed , documented , imminent risk of death , the uniform DOJ policy applied to every other defendant , the government ’ s own statistics showing the rapid increase of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and recent decisions directly on point from other federal courts of appeal , as well as unequivocal evidence of deception and an outright lie by the prosecutors in my case in opposing my request after earlier agreeing to it , this Court of Appeals ignored the precedents in all circuits including DC.
, the current DOJ/BOP policies , the facts regarding my health and the proven danger at the facility I was assigned to and denied the request , knowing it was very likely sending me to my death .
This must be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say I got .
That decision led the President to intervene , thankfully , and commute my sentence ; but there is no way to know how many other defendants will be hurt if this lawless , politically motivated decision in my case is applied to anyone else .
My conclusion about this Court of Appeals is also supported by recent actions taken by the court in other cases that demonstrate that the court has become completely politicized and that the rule of law has become secondary to a political agenda .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ court grant rehearing en banc in two cases involving officials associated with the Trump administration .
Judges on the court felt the need to vacate their previous order to Judge Sullivan to dismiss the Flynn case and for the whole court to rehear decisions that panels of the court had made concerning the judge ’ s abuse of his power in General Flynn ’ s case as well as efforts by Congress to force former White House counsel McGann to testify .
This is truly extraordinary .
On the other hand , this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s decision that Hillary Clinton must answer questions at a deposition about her very troubling conduct .
I could not come to any conclusion from these exceptional events other than that this court at present is motivated more by a political agenda than by adherence to the rule of law or concern for fundamental constitutional rights and so I decided to withdraw my appeal from its consideration .
Winning My Appeal Would Mean a New Trial Before the Same Biased , Politically driven Judge Secondly , my lawyers have made it clear to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trial made a number of rulings on fundamentally important issues that can not be reconciled with my constitutionally protected fair trial rights , the absolute best case scenario that would result from winning my appeal would be to have the case sent back to this same judge who has proven over and over again in my case that she simply can not and will not ever permit me to have a fair trial in her courtroom .
She denied my lawyers ’ motion to disqualify her from my case , notwithstanding her outrageous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before her through the last day and notwithstanding her blatantly political , anti-Trump diatribe at my sentencing that bore little relationship to reality .
I can not take the risk of having to go before her again for a new trial , just to be denied , once again , any ability to pursue a full and robust defense against the meritless charges I have faced and to give her a second chance to ensure my conviction for crimes I did not commit and perhaps impose an even stiffer sentence .
Consider just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what this judge did .
First , as was widely reported and “ somehow ” was captured by a CNN news crew already on the scene , I was arrested at my home in a pre-dawn raid by dozens of agents , including commando units , who descended on our house by land and sea in a manner otherwise reserved only for the leader of an international drug cartel .
This judge cut off all efforts at challenging this arrest or even at investigating who ordered it and why .
The judge also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leaked a draft of the sealed indictment before it was unsealed later in the day .
Next as cited previously she entered the most Draconian gag order imaginable against my lawyers , my supporters , my family and me , prohibiting any of us at any time from in any way , shape , or form , in any forum whatsoever , from responding to inaccurate media reports regarding my case or the actions of ethically bankrupt Mueller team , its investigation , its agenda , or its methods .
Indeed , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prohibited by her again , even after winning a new trial , from in any way challenging the Mueller team and its efforts to extort me and get me to falsely implicate the President in illegal conduct they knew never occurred .
Next , the trial judge granted the prosecution ’ s motion to prohibit me from raising in my defense misconduct by the Office of Special Counsel , the FBI , the DOJ or any Member of Congress in bringing the criminal case against me .
This is unprecedented and contradicts a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ court in the land recognizing the sanctity in our criminal justice system of permitting a defendant in a criminal case from pursuing a theory of defense .
The trial court ’ s ruling can not be reconciled with the fundamental constitutional right in any criminal case to challenge the integrity of the investigation and the investigating team .
The judge in my case simply ignored the many years of legal precedent on this point and would let no fundamental principle interfere with her decision to protect Mueller at all costs and to deny @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a ruling in place in the Flynn trial we would not now know of the withholding of exculpatory evidence from Flynn ’ s Lawyer and documentation from the FBI which prove they knew Flynn violated no law and was politically targeted .
The trial judge ’ s commitment to deny me a fair trial and her political motivation were perhaps best on display with her astonishing political diatribe at my sentencing and with her reckless handling of the outrageous juror misconduct that only came to light after my trial , when we first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attacking me by name on both Twitter and Facebook starting with my arrest and subsequently as well as attacking the President in 2019 .
These social media posts were on a private setting during jury selection and during the trial and were deleted-actually the pages were shut down- after the trial .
A request by my attorneys to subpoena this deleted material from the social media companies was denied by Judge Jackson .
Indeed , where most federal judges would be outraged to learn that a juror had engaged in the kind of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out public attention for , and would demand answers from the juror and impose consequences , the judge in my case reserved her ire exclusively for my lawyers and me for even daring to raise the issue and dismissed it all out of hand , ignoring her intended role as a neutral arbiter , charged with ensuring the integrity of the criminal process in her courtroom .
Despite the US Supreme Court ’ s decision that all defendants are entitled to an “ impartial and indifferent ” jury Judge Jackson ruled that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ constitute bias and denied me a new trial .
At sentencing , the judge announced that it did not at all matter that there was no evidence in my case about Russia or Russian “ collusion ” – the issue most Americans understand the Mueller Team ’ s mandate to be focused on .
Rather , she declared , I was prosecuted for seeking access to Hillary Clinton ’ s emails .
If that were the case , then what was Mueller doing prosecuting the case ?
His law firm represented Hillary Clinton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was Hillary Clinton ’ s personal lawyer in that very case .
That clear conflict of interests was ignored by the Judge .
Judge Jackson also said “ there was nothing phony about the ( Mueller ) investigation , ” something we now know from declassified documents to be untrue , but reflected the Judge ’ s personal political bias .
Next , she announced that I was convicted of “ covering up for President Trump .
“ This was not among the charges nor what I was convicted of .
There was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conclusion .
The judge went one step further and announced that because of my conduct , Congressman Nunes ’ s Committee had been thwarted in its Russian “ collusion ” investigation .
But immediately after the sentencing , Congressman Nunes announced through his spokesman that there was not one iota of truth to what the judge said in this regard .
He made clear that nothing I testified to before his Committee was at all material to or in any way impacted his Committee ’ s work .
How , then , one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been prosecuted for supposedly lying to that Committee when the charge against me required as a necessary element , whether any statement at issue was material and any misstatement required intent .
My lawyers and I have asked that same question from the day the charges were brought through today and there is no legitimate answer .
I Could Not Justify Spending Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars Pursuing a Futile Appeal Given the risk and the chances to prevail in a politically corrupted system I could not justify having to raise the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appeal , given that I would never get a fair appellate hearing and that even if I were to win the appeal , the best-case scenario would be a repeat of a trial marked by the complete denial of my constitutional rights .
All in front of a judge who has invested herself in my conviction in order to try to send a political message that supports her anti-Trump agenda , and who would perhaps impose an even more outrageous sentence on me the next time around if she were able to secure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in my first trial .
It is time for me to move on with my life with my family , friends , and supporters .
I regret not going forward with the appeal to fully expose all that happened , with the hope that by doing so , I could help prevent it from happening to anyone else ever again ; but I had to decide based on what is best for me and my family .
My attorneys have convinced me that the odds of victory were slim and the risk of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and perhaps an unfair second trial before the same Judge was just too great a risk .
The threshold premises behind appealing the unjust result of an unjust judicial process are 1 ) that the injustice was anomalous and 2 ) the unjust result can be ameliorated if the process can be repeated , in a 2nd chance , with the unjust elements removed or otherwise remediated , before the same tribunal .
What an appeal does not and can not remedy is an unjust result that is the product of intrinsic partisan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at a particular defendant based on their identity , for whatever reason , unless the remedy involves a new judge in a different venue .
If this does not occur , ( and it very rarely does ) , and the defendant must simply go through the same process with the same intrinsic biases before the same distempered judge , then even the most meritorious appeal is not only an exercise in futility but also a highly-risky gambit for which the only sure thing is that I would face the same jeopardy and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unmitigated .
The political taint that exists in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia , from the prosecutors to the judge to the jury pool , is so deep and abiding that the possibility of achieving a just result on the merits is as nonexistent as it was when this process played out the first time .
I am eternally grateful that the President saw the injustices in my case , and given my age and health , commuted my sentence , literally to save my life .
He never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of having to do so , but he was , because of the decisions by the trial judge and the Court of Appeals .
Allegations by Hillary Clinton , Rep. Jerry Nadler , Rep. Adam Schiff and Rep. Eric Swallwell that I “ traded my silence regarding misconduct by the President for Presidential clemency “ in my case is categorically false .
Mueller ’ s dirty cops had $ 30M and three years to prove this false narrative and could find no evidence to support it at all while they did seek my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President , an offer I declined .
Therefore , the rational choice , most protective of [ my ] rights and the welfare of my family , is to no longer subject myself to the dispositive authority of this court , even if that means forfeiting my right and desire to demonstrate the outrageous politically-motivated treatment and prosecutorial misconduct that suffused my case and my trial , making them a matter of permanent record , regardless of the outcome of an appeal .
We support Roger Stone and agree that he was set @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a kangaroo court led by a biased judge and a biased jury .
Stone ’ s indictment was a stain on the US system of justice .
Please support the Roger Stone Legal Defense Fund and help him pay off the legal expenses from this charade of injustice .

(above FBI Agents with guns cocked knock on Roger Stone’s front door to arrest him for process crime)
Guest post by Roger Stone:
On the strong advice of my attorneys and after giving the decision considerable thought, I have reluctantly decided to dismiss the appeal of what I believe to be a wrongful conviction in a trial tainted by judicial bias, egregious and blatant juror bias and misconduct and prosecutorial misconduct. Therefore, I directed my attorneys to withdraw my appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
I Could Never Get a Fair Hearing Before this Court of Appeals, Given its Political Agenda
First, I have come to the firm conclusion based on their previous actions in my case to date and based on their recent actions in the Flynn case, that it would be impossible for me to ever get a fair hearing from this appellate court for the vitally important, fundamental constitutional issues my case raises.
(above Roger Stone answering his door early in the morning on January 25, 2019)
Although I believe the gag order issued in my case was patently unconstitutional and the free speech issues filed in a Writ of Mandamus with the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, by one of the most prominent First Amendment lawyers in the country were fairly straightforward, the Court waited many weeks before granting the Government’s request for more time. During this time, while the Washington Post (the dominant newspaper in the jurisdiction from which the jury was selected) as well as CNN, MSNBC and others attacked me with falsehoods, I was prohibited from responding. Let there be no doubt the jury pool was seriously tainted and I sustained serious damage. The Appeals Court after an unreasonable delay, took no action but rather sent the decision back to Judge Berman Jackson, as if there was any possibility that she would vacate her own order.
(Judge Amy Berman Jackson whose actions in the Stone case alone were impeachable.)
I also base this conclusion on other recent developments. After I filed my appeal, I sought a simple sixty-day extension of time to report to prison based on the COVID-19 pandemic and the very real risk of death based on my age and health I faced at the facility to which I was designated to report. That risk was demonstrated by undisputed medical evidence and reports of a rapidly burgeoning COVID-19 positive population at the facility. The Justice Department had a uniform policy of consenting to such extensions in every other case, and judges in DC and around the country had ordered such extensions routinely for every other defendant who had yet to report. Notwithstanding this undisputed, documented, imminent risk of death, the uniform DOJ policy applied to every other defendant, the government’s own statistics showing the rapid increase of COVID-19 positive tests at the facility, and recent decisions directly on point from other federal courts of appeal, as well as unequivocal evidence of deception and an outright lie by the prosecutors in my case in opposing my request after earlier agreeing to it, this Court of Appeals ignored the precedents in all circuits including DC., the current DOJ/BOP policies, the facts regarding my health and the proven danger at the facility I was assigned to and denied the request, knowing it was very likely sending me to my death. This must be part of the special treatment the Democrats say I got.
That decision led the President to intervene, thankfully, and commute my sentence; but there is no way to know how many other defendants will be hurt if this lawless, politically motivated decision in my case is applied to anyone else.
My conclusion about this Court of Appeals is also supported by recent actions taken by the court in other cases that demonstrate that the court has become completely politicized and that the rule of law has become secondary to a political agenda. In recent days, I have seen this court grant rehearing en banc in two cases involving officials associated with the Trump administration. Judges on the court felt the need to vacate their previous order to Judge Sullivan to dismiss the Flynn case and for the whole court to rehear decisions that panels of the court had made concerning the judge’s abuse of his power in General Flynn’s case as well as efforts by Congress to force former White House counsel McGann to testify. This is truly extraordinary. On the other hand, this same court just reversed a judge’s decision that Hillary Clinton must answer questions at a deposition about her very troubling conduct. I could not come to any conclusion from these exceptional events other than that this court at present is motivated more by a political agenda than by adherence to the rule of law or concern for fundamental constitutional rights and so I decided to withdraw my appeal from its consideration.
Winning My Appeal Would Mean a New Trial Before the Same Biased, Politically driven Judge
Secondly, my lawyers have made it clear to me that while the judge at my trial made a number of rulings on fundamentally important issues that cannot be reconciled with my constitutionally protected fair trial rights, the absolute best case scenario that would result from winning my appeal would be to have the case sent back to this same judge who has proven over and over again in my case that she simply cannot and will not ever permit me to have a fair trial in her courtroom. She denied my lawyers’ motion to disqualify her from my case, notwithstanding her outrageous conduct from the first day I appeared before her through the last day and notwithstanding her blatantly political, anti-Trump diatribe at my sentencing that bore little relationship to reality. I cannot take the risk of having to go before her again for a new trial, just to be denied, once again, any ability to pursue a full and robust defense against the meritless charges I have faced and to give her a second chance to ensure my conviction for crimes I did not commit and perhaps impose an even stiffer sentence.
(Obama appointed Judge Amy Berman Jackson)
Consider just a few of the outrageous examples of what this judge did. First, as was widely reported and “somehow” was captured by a CNN news crew already on the scene, I was arrested at my home in a pre-dawn raid by dozens of agents, including commando units, who descended on our house by land and sea in a manner otherwise reserved only for the leader of an international drug cartel. This judge cut off all efforts at challenging this arrest or even at investigating who ordered it and why. The judge also would not let me determine who illegally leaked a draft of the sealed indictment before it was unsealed later in the day.
(Roger Stone taken away by FBI Agents after their pre-dawn raid on his house.)
Next as cited previously she entered the most Draconian gag order imaginable against my lawyers, my supporters, my family and me, prohibiting any of us at any time from in any way, shape, or form, in any forum whatsoever, from responding to inaccurate media reports regarding my case or the actions of ethically bankrupt Mueller team, its investigation, its agenda, or its methods.
Indeed, we were prohibited, and undoubtedly would be prohibited by her again, even after winning a new trial, from in any way challenging the Mueller team and its efforts to extort me and get me to falsely implicate the President in illegal conduct they knew never occurred.
Next, the trial judge granted the prosecution’s motion to prohibit me from raising in my defense misconduct by the Office of Special Counsel, the FBI, the DOJ or any Member of Congress in bringing the criminal case against me. This is unprecedented and contradicts a long line of precedent from the highest court in the land recognizing the sanctity in our criminal justice system of permitting a defendant in a criminal case from pursuing a theory of defense. The trial court’s ruling cannot be reconciled with the fundamental constitutional right in any criminal case to challenge the integrity of the investigation and the investigating team. The judge in my case simply ignored the many years of legal precedent on this point and would let no fundamental principle interfere with her decision to protect Mueller at all costs and to deny me a fair trial. Were such a ruling in place in the Flynn trial we would not now know of the withholding of exculpatory evidence from Flynn’s Lawyer and documentation from the FBI which prove they knew Flynn violated no law and was politically targeted.
(Roger Stone after being released by the courts after his arrest)
The trial judge’s commitment to deny me a fair trial and her political motivation were perhaps best on display with her astonishing political diatribe at my sentencing and with her reckless handling of the outrageous juror misconduct that only came to light after my trial, when we first learned that the jury foreperson had been attacking me by name on both Twitter and Facebook starting with my arrest and subsequently as well as attacking the President in 2019. These social media posts were on a private setting during jury selection and during the trial and were deleted-actually the pages were shut down- after the trial. A request by my attorneys to subpoena this deleted material from the social media companies was denied by Judge Jackson.
(Stone and jury foreperson who ran as a Democrat and used social media to condemn the President multiple times.)
Indeed, where most federal judges would be outraged to learn that a juror had engaged in the kind of conduct she engaged in and then sought out public attention for, and would demand answers from the juror and impose consequences, the judge in my case reserved her ire exclusively for my lawyers and me for even daring to raise the issue and dismissed it all out of hand, ignoring her intended role as a neutral arbiter, charged with ensuring the integrity of the criminal process in her courtroom. Despite the US Supreme Court’s decision that all defendants are entitled to an “impartial and indifferent” jury Judge Jackson ruled that the Jury forewoman’s conduct did not constitute bias and denied me a new trial.
At sentencing, the judge announced that it did not at all matter that there was no evidence in my case about Russia or Russian “collusion” – the issue most Americans understand the Mueller Team’s mandate to be focused on. Rather, she declared, I was prosecuted for seeking access to Hillary Clinton’s emails. If that were the case, then what was Mueller doing prosecuting the case? His law firm represented Hillary Clinton and the lead prosecutor in my case was Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer in that very case. That clear conflict of interests was ignored by the Judge. Judge Jackson also said “there was nothing phony about the (Mueller) investigation,” something we now know from declassified documents to be untrue, but reflected the Judge’s personal political bias.
(Roger Stone)
Next, she announced that I was convicted of “covering up for President Trump. “This was not among the charges nor what I was convicted of. There was no such evidence to support such a conclusion. The judge went one step further and announced that because of my conduct, Congressman Nunes’s Committee had been thwarted in its Russian “collusion” investigation. But immediately after the sentencing, Congressman Nunes announced through his spokesman that there was not one iota of truth to what the judge said in this regard. He made clear that nothing I testified to before his Committee was at all material to or in any way impacted his Committee’s work.
(Roger Stone and President Trump)
How, then, one might ask, could I ever even have been prosecuted for supposedly lying to that Committee when the charge against me required as a necessary element, whether any statement at issue was material and any misstatement required intent. My lawyers and I have asked that same question from the day the charges were brought through today and there is no legitimate answer.
I Could Not Justify Spending Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars Pursuing a Futile Appeal
Given the risk and the chances to prevail in a politically corrupted system I could not justify having to raise the hundreds of thousands more to pursue the appeal, given that I would never get a fair appellate hearing and that even if I were to win the appeal, the best-case scenario would be a repeat of a trial marked by the complete denial of my constitutional rights. All in front of a judge who has invested herself in my conviction in order to try to send a political message that supports her anti-Trump agenda, and who would perhaps impose an even more outrageous sentence on me the next time around if she were able to secure my conviction with the same tactics used in my first trial.
It is time for me to move on with my life with my family, friends, and supporters. I regret not going forward with the appeal to fully expose all that happened, with the hope that by doing so, I could help prevent it from happening to anyone else ever again; but I had to decide based on what is best for me and my family. My attorneys have convinced me that the odds of victory were slim and the risk of being subjected to both an unfair appeal and perhaps an unfair second trial before the same Judge was just too great a risk.
(Roger Stone with his lovely wife)
The threshold premises behind appealing the unjust result of an unjust judicial process are 1) that the injustice was anomalous and 2) the unjust result can be ameliorated if the process can be repeated, in a 2nd chance, with the unjust elements removed or otherwise remediated, before the same tribunal. What an appeal does not and cannot remedy is an unjust result that is the product of intrinsic partisan bias and corrupt judicial bias uniquely directed at a particular defendant based on their identity, for whatever reason, unless the remedy involves a new judge in a different venue. If this does not occur, (and it very rarely does), and the defendant must simply go through the same process with the same intrinsic biases before the same distempered judge, then even the most meritorious appeal is not only an exercise in futility but also a highly-risky gambit for which the only sure thing is that I would face the same jeopardy and costs, but with the essential problems unmitigated.
The political taint that exists in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia, from the prosecutors to the judge to the jury pool, is so deep and abiding that the possibility of achieving a just result on the merits is as nonexistent as it was when this process played out the first time.
I am eternally grateful that the President saw the injustices in my case, and given my age and health, commuted my sentence, literally to save my life. He never should have been put in the position of having to do so, but he was, because of the decisions by the trial judge and the Court of Appeals. Allegations by Hillary Clinton, Rep. Jerry Nadler, Rep. Adam Schiff and Rep. Eric Swallwell that I “traded my silence regarding misconduct by the President for Presidential clemency “in my case is categorically false. Mueller’s dirty cops had $30M and three years to prove this false narrative and could find no evidence to support it at all while they did seek my co-operation to bear false witness against the President, an offer I declined.
Therefore, the rational choice, most protective of [my] rights and the welfare of my family, is to no longer subject myself to the dispositive authority of this court, even if that means forfeiting my right and desire to demonstrate the outrageous politically-motivated treatment and prosecutorial misconduct that suffused my case and my trial, making them a matter of permanent record, regardless of the outcome of an appeal.
We support Roger Stone and agree that he was set up for false and immaterial crimes in a kangaroo court led by a biased judge and a biased jury. Stone’s indictment was a stain on the US system of justice.
Please support the Roger Stone Legal Defense Fund and help him pay off the legal expenses from this charade of injustice.


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--The Moment Trump Won Re-Election: The Cringiest Part of the Dem Convention Everyone is Talking About

The Moment Trump Won Re-Election: The Cringiest Part of the Dem Convention Everyone is Talking About (VIDEO)

The Democrat convention kicked off Monday evening and it was a total dumpster fire .
The Democrat party has embraced @ @ @ @ @ for the destruction of Capitalism and the defunding of the police .
Socialist Bernie Sanders @ @ @ @ @ and bragged about how far left the Democrat party has moved .
TRENDING : `` @ @ @ @ @ What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid @ @ @ @ @ of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) The cringiest part of the online convention was @ @ @ @ @ closing performance .
This was the moment Trump won re-election .
The reaction from Twitter @ @ @ @

The Commie Democrat convention kicked off Monday evening and it was a total dumpster fire.
The Democrat party has embraced neo-Marxists who are openly calling for the destruction of Capitalism and the defunding of the police.
Classless Michelle Obama trashed President Trump last night in a pre-recorded speech.
Socialist Bernie Sanders lashed out at President Trump and bragged about how far left the Democrat party has moved.
The Dem convention resembled an online awards show.
The cringiest part of the online convention was Billy Porters’s bizarre closing performance.
This was the moment Trump won re-election.
WATCH:
The moment Trump won re-election pic.twitter.com/nEuUp8F0zp — Secular Talk (@KyleKulinski) August 18, 2020
The reaction from Twitter users was hilarious.
Another WTF moment at #CommieCon — 🇺🇸 Tiff 🇺🇸 (@LATiffani1) August 18, 2020
Holy shit, is this REAL? lol — The🐰FOO (@PolitiBunny) August 18, 2020
Dems thinking this was a good idea.. is the result of Locking themselves in an Ultra-Woke echo chamber, for 4+ years.. And now the rest of the country is looking at them like the mutated, out-of-touch mess they've become. — TrippyLibertyॐ (Notable Exception) (@TrippyLiberty) August 18, 2020


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--Even Liberal Media Can’t Defend Her Lies: AP ROASTS Michelle Obama on Her Dishonest ‘Kids in Cages’

Even Liberal Media Can’t Defend Her Lies: AP ROASTS Michelle Obama on Her Dishonest ‘Kids in Cages’ Speech at DNC

Last night former First Lady Michelle Obama slammed President Trump for his atrocious act of holding illegal alien children in cages .
The left was very disturbed by this Trumpian practice when the story broke in 2017 .
But then it was soon pointed out the kids in cages photos were from the Obama years .
Obama locked up the kids in cages .
The photos were from 2014 .
TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ didn ’ t stop Michelle Obama from , again , pushing this lie , during her DNC convention speech last night .
What is surprising is that the AP actually reported honestly and trashed the former First Lady over her lies .
The Associated Press via The Seattle Times reported : Michelle Obama assailed President Donald Trump on Monday for ripping migrant children from their parents and throwing them into cages , picking up on a frequent and distorted point made widely by Democrats .
She ’ s right that Trump ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thousands of children from their families in ways that had not been done before .
But what she did not say is that the very same “ cages ” were built and used in her husband ’ s administration , for the same purpose of holding migrant kids temporarily .
A look at her remark in the keynote address at the opening night of the remote Democratic National Convention : MICHELLE OBAMA , on Americans : “ They watch in horror as children are torn from their families and thrown into cages.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is misleading and a matter that Democrats have persistently distorted .
Trump used facilities that were built during the Obama-Biden administration to house children at the border .
They are chain-link enclosures inside border facilities where migrants were temporarily housed , separated by sex and age .
At the height of the controversy over Trump ’ s zero-tolerance policy at the border , photos that circulated online of children in the enclosures generated great anger .
But those photos — by The Associated Press — were taken in 2014 and depicted some of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President Barack Obama .
When that fact came to light , some Democrats and activists who had tweeted the photos deleted their tweets .
But prominent Democrats have continued to cite cages for children as a distinctive cruelty of Trump .

Last night former First Lady Michelle Obama slammed President Trump for his atrocious act of holding illegal alien children in cages.
The left was very disturbed by this Trumpian practice when the story broke in 2017.
But then it was soon pointed out the kids in cages photos were from the Obama years.
Obama locked up the kids in cages.
The photos were from 2014.
But this didn’t stop Michelle Obama from, again, pushing this lie, during her DNC convention speech last night.
What is surprising is that the AP actually reported honestly and trashed the former First Lady over her lies.
The Associated Press via The Seattle Times reported:


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--“Sit Back and Watch!” – President Trump ROASTS Michelle Obama After Convention Speech

Monday night was a COMPLETE DISASTER for the Democrat Party .
Democrats promoted the rioting in the streets , open @ @ @ @ @ New Deal .
Then Michelle Obama proudly urged her fellow Democrats break the law and @ @ @ @ @ GO VOTE IN PERSON !
Michelle used her time to attack President Trump .
Classy @ @ @ @ @ is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner @ @ @ @ @ Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) On Tuesday morning President @ @ @ @ @ Michelle .
The intrepid President didn ’ t shy away from criticizing classless Michelle Obama @ @ @ @ @ the women ’ s right to vote .
“ Well she ’ s in over @ @ @ @ @ , she should ’ ve made the speech live , which she didn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ Tuesday when asked his reaction to Obama ’ s remarks , calling her speech “ @ @ @

Monday night was a COMPLETE DISASTER for the Democrat Party.
Democrats promoted the rioting in the streets, open borders and the insane Green New Deal.
Then Michelle Obama proudly urged her fellow Democrats break the law and to vote early AND THEN GO VOTE IN PERSON!
Michelle used her time to attack President Trump.
Classy.
On Tuesday morning President Trump dropped the hammer on Michelle.
The intrepid President didn’t shy away from criticizing classless Michelle Obama during the centennial celebration of the women’s right to vote.


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--Democrat Dumpster Fire: On Day One of DNC Democrats Promote Violent Protests, Open Borders and the D

Democrat Dumpster Fire: On Day One of DNC Democrats Promote Violent Protests, Open Borders and the Devastating and Foolish Green New Deal

After Democrat Rep. Ayanna Pressley called for targeting GOP officials with “ unrest in the streets ” over the weekend @ @ @ @ @ violence in Portland emerged , Joe Biden ’ s Squad member applauded the rioters in @ @ @ @ @ ” Here are the kind of activities Rep. Pressley is applauding : TRENDING : `` @ @ @ @ @ What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid @ @ @ @ @ of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) Rev .
Dr. Freddie Haynes , who has @ @ @ @ @ said , America “ may well go to hell ” if we don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ the Democrats promoted the Green New Deal which would destroy the world ’ s greatest @ @ @ @ @ ’ s first day was a dumpster fire .
If they win , America and @ @ @ @ @ generations .

After Democrat Rep. Ayanna Pressley called for targeting GOP officials with “unrest in the streets” over the weekend and more shocking footage of violence in Portland emerged, Joe Biden’s Squad member applauded the rioters in Portland for “rising up.”
During the virtual DNC, Squad member Democrat Rep. Ayanna Pressley applauds the rioters in Portland for “rising up” and pushing “divestment”https://t.co/e8nGloxVpN pic.twitter.com/C5LWxHtfHJ — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 17, 2020
Here are the kind of activities Rep. Pressley is applauding:
GRAPHIC: Rioters in downtown Portland detain man who had a car crash. They force him to sit on the ground while they search his belongings. One of them runs up and kicks him in the head, instantly knocking him out. There are no police. Video by @FromKalen https://t.co/x646QheCV0 — Andy Ngô 🏳🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) August 17, 2020
Rev. Dr. Freddie Haynes, who has frequently praised anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan said, America “may well go to hell” if we don’t have open borders.
Pastor at the virtual Democratic National Convention says America “may well go to hell” if we don’t have open bordershttps://t.co/PE4ICW2Umg pic.twitter.com/9H01ZY3xau — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 17, 2020
Then the Democrats promoted the Green New Deal which would destroy the world’s greatest economy ever:
DNC panelist: use the Green New Deal to further the “destruction” of capitalismhttps://t.co/87P7uivETo pic.twitter.com/Ua4UYaUHgO — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 17, 2020
The DNC’s first day was a dumpster fire. If they win, America and the world will suffer for generations.


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--UPDATE: President Trump Pardons Susan B. Anthony on Centennial of 19th Amendment, Giving Women the R

UPDATE: President Trump Pardons Susan B. Anthony on Centennial of 19th Amendment, Giving Women the Right to Vote

NEW : On the flight home from Wisconsin , the President told us he plans to pardon someone “ very @ @ @ @ @ who is not Edward Snowden or Michael Flynn .
President Trump said on Monday that @ @ @ @ @ “ very , very important ” on Tuesday , but would not go into details @ @ @ @ @ TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran @ @ @ @ @ Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on Notice ( VIDEO ) @ @ @ @ @ Force One while on his way back to Washington from a tour of battleground states @ @ @ @ @ dropped the news about the upcoming pardon – saying only that it would not be @ @ @ @ @ or Trump ’ s former national security adviser Michael Flynn .
Trump over the weekend @ @ @ @ @ pardoning Snowden , the former National Security Agency contractor who has been living in Russia @ @ @ @ @ vast domestic and international surveillance operations carried out by the NSA .

CBS reporter Weijia Jiang shared this last night:
NEW: On the flight home from Wisconsin, the President told us he plans to pardon someone “very, very important” tomorrow who is not Edward Snowden or Michael Flynn.
FOX News reported:
President Trump said on Monday that he plans to pardon someone “very, very important” on Tuesday, but would not go into details about who it is.
Speaking to reporters on Air Force One while on his way back to Washington from a tour of battleground states in the Midwest, Trump dropped the news about the upcoming pardon – saying only that it would not be former NSA staffer Edward Snowden or Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
Trump over the weekend hinted that he was considering pardoning Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor who has been living in Russia since he leaked information on vast domestic and international surveillance operations carried out by the NSA.


thegatewaypundit--2020-08-18--Democrat Dumpster Fire: First Night Like “Bringing All the Energy of the Bob Dole Campaign…Today”

The first night of the Democrat Convention went off like an infomercial for the 1990 ’ s Republican Party .
The mistakes were many and the content was boring and old .
Not a good start for the Democrats who are backing a terrible candidate for President .
Democrat Presidential candidate Marianne Williamson said it all in one tweet : The comments related to her tweet were hilarious : TRENDING : `` This is a Warning For What 's Coming ! ''
- Veteran and California Business Owner Fed Up with Covid Lockdown Orders Puts County Board of Supervisors on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the DNC of attempting to redress the failed 1996 Bob Dole campaign : Viewers of the first hour or so of the 2020 Democratic National Convention were likely asking themselves what they were watching and why .
The CNN telecast was indistinguishable from a 1990s infomercial : bad video quality , cheesy music , almost improbably absurd dialogue ( “ Joe Biden is a healer and a unifier ” ) delivered by bored-sounding C-list celebrities .
The whole experiment made April ’ s awkward socially distanced NFL draft seem like classic television .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ paid late-night spot for Ross Perot , the vibe was very much “ MTV circa 1982.
” Eva Longoria stood in front of a painfully low-budget set and mumbled banalities in between Bruce Springsteen music videos .
One thing the start of the convention did not resemble even remotely was the posted schedule on the official website .
The first speaker , Mayor Muriel Bowser of Washington , D.C. , did not even appear in the itinerary .
The two names actually at the top of the schedule , Sens .
Amy Klobuchar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( D-Nev. ) , appeared to be skipped in favor of Gov .
Andrew Cuomo ( D-N.Y. ) .
And the Democrats somehow thought this was going to win over the Midwest : The first day of the DNC was a mess .
But then again , it may be better than the last DNC in 2016 when the Head of the DNC was forced to resign for the aiding and abetting Hillary Clinton in the primaries over Bernie Sanders and the Clinton campaign seeing their quagmire started pushing a Trump – Russia @ @ @

Democrat Presidential candidate Marianne Williamson said it all in one tweet:
The comments related to her tweet were hilarious:
I keep expecting her to say “if you to were buy the albums to collect these songs, it would cost u thousands, but we put all ur favorite songs together right here on DNCrock.
Some comments accused the DNC of attempting to redress the failed 1996 Bob Dole campaign:
https://twitter.com/Brendelbored/status/1295415213064441857?s=20
Reviews from the left weren’t good:
Viewers of the first hour or so of the 2020 Democratic National Convention were likely asking themselves what they were watching and why. The CNN telecast was indistinguishable from a 1990s infomercial: bad video quality, cheesy music, almost improbably absurd dialogue (“Joe Biden is a healer and a unifier”) delivered by bored-sounding C-list celebrities. The whole experiment made April’s awkward socially distanced NFL draft seem like classic television.
When it did not feel like a paid late-night spot for Ross Perot, the vibe was very much “MTV circa 1982.” Eva Longoria stood in front of a painfully low-budget set and mumbled banalities in between Bruce Springsteen music videos.
One thing the start of the convention did not resemble even remotely was the posted schedule on the official website. The first speaker, Mayor Muriel Bowser of Washington, D.C., did not even appear in the itinerary. The two names actually at the top of the schedule, Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), appeared to be skipped in favor of Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.).