thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-14--Judge Napolitano Suggests Jury Foreperson in Roger Stone Trial Could Be Jailed, Conviction Overturne

Judge Napolitano Suggests Jury Foreperson in Roger Stone Trial Could Be Jailed, Conviction Overturned

Judge Andrew Napolitano commented on the remarkable revelations coming out of the Roger Stone trial , namely that the jury foreperson had a significant anti-Trump and anti-Stone bias .
Facts regarding Tomeka Hart , the juror in question , have been coming out of late , facts that probably should have been known by the judge or prosecutors in the case long before now .
Hart , it has been revealed , donated to Democrat candidates rather frequently ( she donated $ 100 to Kamala Harris during the trial ) , actually ran for Congress as a Democrat , posted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President are racists , and even shared a post mocking Stone for decrying the ‘ excessive force ’ used in his arrest .
“ Then stop being racists , ” she wrote in response to one article about Trump supporters growing weary of being called the term .
“ Co-signing and defending a racist and his racist rhetoric makes you racist , ” Hart continued .
“ Point blank.
” Which begs the question , how in the hell was this woman , who very clearly has an animus towards Stone and anybody @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serve on the jury period , much less as foreperson ?
Napolitano has some opinions and if they ’ re right , suggests Hart could be looking at being charged with a crime .
RELATED : Gowdy to Dems Calling For Barr Resignation : “ Dumbest Damn Thing I ’ ve Ever Heard ” Did She Hide Her Bias ?
Judge Napolitano appeared with Fox News personality Tucker Carlson to discuss the case which has ignited Democrats to pursue new impeachment charges and investigations against the President and Attorney General Bill Barr .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to remain on the jury ?
” Carlson asked .
Hart , Napolitano believes , has a very serious problem if it is determined that she intentionally hid her bias .
“ This is information that she must have hidden from the lawyers and the judge who interrogated her before she was put on the jury , ” he explained , noting that federal cases require a judge interrogate the jurors .
“ The purpose of the interrogation is to weed out people that have a bias , prejudice , and knowledge of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Napolitano continued .
“ She obviously had a prejudice against Roger Stone , a bias in favor of his prosecution , and an interest in seeing him convicted.
” There is another scenario though less likely – that the judge and prosecutors knew of Hart ’ s mindset and were okay with it .
The reality is , in most courts in America this would be grounds for a mistrial .
Napolitano believes the judge in this trial needs to bring Hart back in , along with the prosecutors who recently attempted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the President , and interrogate her again .
If it is determined Hart lied about bias or prior knowledge of Stone in her initial interrogation , said Napolitano , “ It would be catastrophic for her.
” “ First of all , she is a lawyer , ” he said .
“ So she would be prosecuted for perjury since the statements are given under oath.
” “ And if convicted she would lose her license to practice law but that would be the least of her concerns , ” Napolitano continued @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time if she lied in order to affect the outcome of a case.
” He also proposed that if it is determined that Hart falsely represented herself , the conviction would be vacated and a new trial ordered .
Considering Democrats are hell-bent on taking down President Trump and AG Bill Barr over this , imagine their rage when one of their own resistance footsoldiers ends up getting Stone off .

Judge Andrew Napolitano commented on the remarkable revelations coming out of the Roger Stone trial, namely that the jury foreperson had a significant anti-Trump and anti-Stone bias.
Facts regarding Tomeka Hart, the juror in question, have been coming out of late, facts that probably should have been known by the judge or prosecutors in the case long before now.
Hart, it has been revealed, donated to Democrat candidates rather frequently (she donated $100 to Kamala Harris during the trial), actually ran for Congress as a Democrat, posted on social media that supporters of the President are racists, and even shared a post mocking Stone for decrying the ‘excessive force’ used in his arrest.
“Then stop being racists,” she wrote in response to one article about Trump supporters growing weary of being called the term.
“Co-signing and defending a racist and his racist rhetoric makes you racist,” Hart continued. “Point blank.”
Which begs the question, how in the hell was this woman, who very clearly has an animus towards Stone and anybody involved with President Trump, allowed to serve on the jury period, much less as foreperson?
Napolitano has some opinions and if they’re right, suggests Hart could be looking at being charged with a crime.
Hi @TennesseeBar! Are you aware one of your lawyers – Tomeka Hart – served as lead juror for the Roger Stone trial despite attacking him on twitter after he was arrested? During selection she testified she had no bias or specific information about Stonehttps://t.co/8DkdoH44wG — Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) February 13, 2020
RELATED: Gowdy to Dems Calling For Barr Resignation: “Dumbest Damn Thing I’ve Ever Heard”
Did She Hide Her Bias?
Judge Napolitano appeared with Fox News personality Tucker Carlson to discuss the case which has ignited Democrats to pursue new impeachment charges and investigations against the President and Attorney General Bill Barr.
“Why was someone like this allowed to remain on the jury?” Carlson asked.
Hart, Napolitano believes, has a very serious problem if it is determined that she intentionally hid her bias.
“This is information that she must have hidden from the lawyers and the judge who interrogated her before she was put on the jury,” he explained, noting that federal cases require a judge interrogate the jurors.
“The purpose of the interrogation is to weed out people that have a bias, prejudice, and knowledge of case or interest in the outcome,” Napolitano continued.
“She obviously had a prejudice against Roger Stone, a bias in favor of his prosecution, and an interest in seeing him convicted.”
There is another scenario though less likely – that the judge and prosecutors knew of Hart’s mindset and were okay with it.
Tomeka Hart said that Stone’s affiliation with Trump would “absolutely not” affect how she weighed evidence. She tweeted just months before the trial that all of Trump’s supporters are racist. Stone is of course a longtime Trump supporter who coaxed him into running for office. — Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) February 13, 2020
RELATED: Juanita Broaddrick Whacks ‘Bottom Dwelling Slug’ Hillary After She Calls Trump a ‘Failed-State Fascist’
Bring Her Back In
The reality is, in most courts in America this would be grounds for a mistrial.
Napolitano believes the judge in this trial needs to bring Hart back in, along with the prosecutors who recently attempted to resign in protest over perceived interference by the President, and interrogate her again.
If it is determined Hart lied about bias or prior knowledge of Stone in her initial interrogation, said Napolitano, “It would be catastrophic for her.”
“First of all, she is a lawyer,” he said. “So she would be prosecuted for perjury since the statements are given under oath.”
“And if convicted she would lose her license to practice law but that would be the least of her concerns,” Napolitano continued. “She probably would serve jail time if she lied in order to affect the outcome of a case.”
He also proposed that if it is determined that Hart falsely represented herself, the conviction would be vacated and a new trial ordered.
Considering Democrats are hell-bent on taking down President Trump and AG Bill Barr over this, imagine their rage when one of their own resistance footsoldiers ends up getting Stone off.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-14--NY Governor Andrew Cuomo Accuses ICE of Wanting to ‘Assault’ Illegal Aliens

Governor Andrew Cuomo , in an interview on Wednesday , has accused law enforcement at Immigration and Customs Enforcement ( ICE ) of wanting to ‘ assault ’ illegal immigrants .
Cuomo ( D-NY ) made the comments prior to a meeting with President Trump concerning the Trusted Traveler Program .
The administration has enacted a Global Entry freeze on the state of New York after the passage of a law allowing illegals to attain a driver ’ s license .
The so-called ‘ Green Light Law ’ prevents federal agencies like ICE and Customs and Border Protection ( CBP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department of Motor Vehicles databases .
Why is it so vital to keep that information from ICE according to Cuomo ?
“ They want access to the undocumenteds so they can give it to ICE , ” the governor told WAMC , “ and ICE can have a feeding frenzy assaulting undocumented people.
” RELATED : Cuomo Calls ICE ‘ A Bunch of Thugs , ’ Admits He ’ s a Liar in New York Governor ’ s Debate Following the comments , Cuomo referenced a recent case in which an illegal alien @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agents led to the shooting of another man close by .
What Cuomo won ’ t tell you is that the illegal in this case was no saint , having previously been deported in 2011 following a guilty plea to an assault charge .
He was arrested earlier in the week after being stopped for failing to signal a turn , driving without a license and improper license plates , according to court documents viewed by the Times .
ICE issued a statement saying the use of the stun gun and firing of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were “ physically attacked.
” So who is assaulting whom here , Mr. Cuomo ?
Listen to the interview below : RELATED : Ocasio-Cortez Claims She Feared For Her Safety Around Border Patrol Officers Cuomo likes to fancy himself a reasonable , level-headed , progressive who is the most intelligent person in the room .
He believes this because he ’ s surrounded by a fawning schoolgirl-level press corp in New York state that calls him out on absolutely nothing .
Take this interview for example .
WAMC host Alan Chartock asks Cuomo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the following manner : You ’ re actually going to go and sit across from the president , right ?
How can you do that ?
I mean , how can you look at that guy and talk to him .
I mean , I know it sounds presumptuous of me , but you know , he ’ s awful .
With a question designed to paint the President as a villain and the valley girl delivery from the interviewer , how can Cuomo not assume he ’ s the hero in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the governor to paint ICE with the broad brush of wanting to ‘ assault ’ illegals in a ‘ feeding frenzy.
’ It ’ s what allows Cuomo , minutes earlier , to describe federal officials as “ arsonists ” while Chartock nods in agreement , “ Yes , now they ’ re just arsonists.
” It ’ s the kind of mindset that lets the governor get away with calling the law enforcement officers of ICE “ a bunch of thugs ” during the 2018 debates .
It ’ s one thing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policies , it ’ s another when you are completely unable to distinguish yourself from radicals like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who has suggested ICE is an organization that “ incarcerates children and sexually assaults women with impunity.
” Cuomo is nothing close to reasonable .
He is a vile creature in the mold of radicals like AOC , despised by all but a handful of counties in New York that allow him to remain in power .

Governor Andrew Cuomo, in an interview on Wednesday, has accused law enforcement at Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) of wanting to ‘assault’ illegal immigrants.
Cuomo (D-NY) made the comments prior to a meeting with President Trump concerning the Trusted Traveler Program.
The administration has enacted a Global Entry freeze on the state of New York after the passage of a law allowing illegals to attain a driver’s license. The so-called ‘Green Light Law’ prevents federal agencies like ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) from accessing the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles databases.
Why is it so vital to keep that information from ICE according to Cuomo?
“They want access to the undocumenteds so they can give it to ICE,” the governor told WAMC, “and ICE can have a feeding frenzy assaulting undocumented people.”
Wonder how law enforcement at @ICEgov feel about @NYGovCuomo accusing them of wanting to ‘assault’ illegal immigrants. pic.twitter.com/Tpd6WyPTcL — Rusty Weiss 🇺🇸 (@rustyweiss74) February 13, 2020
RELATED: Cuomo Calls ICE ‘A Bunch of Thugs,’ Admits He’s a Liar in New York Governor’s Debate
Feeding Frenzy
Following the comments, Cuomo referenced a recent case in which an illegal alien reportedly involved in an altercation with ICE agents led to the shooting of another man close by.
The New York Times reports:
An altercation broke out in front of Mr. Avendaño’s [the illegal] home, according to witnesses and officials. As the officers, from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, tried to detain him, Mr. Avendaño was shot with a stun gun. One officer then fired a gun at a second man, the son of Mr. Avendaño’s longtime girlfriend, with the bullet piercing the young man’s cheek.
What Cuomo won’t tell you is that the illegal in this case was no saint, having previously been deported in 2011 following a guilty plea to an assault charge.
He was arrested earlier in the week after being stopped for failing to signal a turn, driving without a license and improper license plates, according to court documents viewed by the Times.
ICE issued a statement saying the use of the stun gun and firing of a weapon only occurred after the officers were “physically attacked.”
So who is assaulting whom here, Mr. Cuomo?
Listen to the interview below:
RELATED: Ocasio-Cortez Claims She Feared For Her Safety Around Border Patrol Officers
Cuomo is AOC Lite
Cuomo likes to fancy himself a reasonable, level-headed, progressive who is the most intelligent person in the room. He believes this because he’s surrounded by a fawning schoolgirl-level press corp in New York state that calls him out on absolutely nothing.
Take this interview for example. WAMC host Alan Chartock asks Cuomo about the upcoming meeting with Trump in the following manner:
You’re actually going to go and sit across from the president, right? How can you do that? I mean, how can you look at that guy and talk to him. I mean, I know it sounds presumptuous of me, but you know, he’s awful.
With a question designed to paint the President as a villain and the valley girl delivery from the interviewer, how can Cuomo not assume he’s the hero in this situation?
It’s what allows the governor to paint ICE with the broad brush of wanting to ‘assault’ illegals in a ‘feeding frenzy.’
It’s what allows Cuomo, minutes earlier, to describe federal officials as “arsonists” while Chartock nods in agreement, “Yes, now they’re just arsonists.”
It’s the kind of mindset that lets the governor get away with calling the law enforcement officers of ICE “a bunch of thugs” during the 2018 debates.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo slams ICE as “a bunch of thugs” in heated debate with opponent Cynthia Nixon pic.twitter.com/afW6Pj2Nck — FOX & friends (@foxandfriends) August 30, 2018
It’s one thing to oppose the President’s immigration policies, it’s another when you are completely unable to distinguish yourself from radicals like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who has suggested ICE is an organization that “incarcerates children and sexually assaults women with impunity.”
Cuomo is nothing close to reasonable. He is a vile creature in the mold of radicals like AOC, despised by all but a handful of counties in New York that allow him to remain in power.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-14--Maxine Waters Wants To Judge Banks On ‘Diversity,’ Not Only On Financial Stability

Not content with introducing racial quotas into many aspects of American life such as education , politics , and media , now Democrats want to make banks take into account “ diversity ” when they are judged by federal bank regulators .
Sure , the bank may be going under , maybe the top echelon of management is skimming .
But if it has the right PC gender and racial makeup in the boardroom and God knows where else , why then , they ’ re good as gold , shipshape and Bristol fashion .
It ’ ll never get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the president .
Even many Democrats see it as lunacy .
But that doesn ’ t stop Rep. Maxine Waters of CA .
Oh no , lunacy is her stock and trade .
She supports the “ Promoting Diversity and Inclusion Act of 2019.
” Federal bank regulators judge banks by a system known as “ CAMELS.
” It ’ s an acronym for capital , assets , management , earnings , liquidity , and sensitivity to risk .
Waters wants to add racial and gender quotas to the list .
And isn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of finance , like giving cheap home loans to people who wouldn ’ t usually qualify for them , the kind of thing that brought on the financial crisis of 2008 ?
Oh sure , the bank has about as much financial credibility as a wet sock .
But hey !
All is copacetic because the morons who have been running the joint are really really diverse !
Why is it only racial and gender quotas that the left seeks ?
Why are there no lower middle class workers on the board of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the top station of Planned Parenthood ?
I mean , if you really want diversity .
And why do the racial and gender quotas only cut one way ?
Where are all the NBA players of German heritage , since Americans of that ilk make up a significant portion of the population ?
I must have missed all the men running the Big Sister organization .
No , trans guys don ’ t count .
MORE NEWS : Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote All the lawsuits , marches , news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more Norwegians in the Congressional Black Caucus must still be on the drawing board .
They have about as much chance to see the light of reality as does this latest idiocy from Maxine Waters .
We can be thankful for both those results , as the CBC folks I know would totally not be into sardines .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : Mitt Romney hit with new Republican resolution that would force him to support Trump or give up his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to attack Fox News for ignoring major Trump story – it immediately backfires Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi

By David Kamioner | February 14, 2020
Not content with introducing racial quotas into many aspects of American life such as education, politics, and media, now Democrats want to make banks take into account “diversity” when they are judged by federal bank regulators.
Sure, the bank may be going under, maybe the top echelon of management is skimming. But if it has the right PC gender and racial makeup in the boardroom and God knows where else, why then, they’re good as gold, shipshape and Bristol fashion.
MORE NEWS: Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
It’ll never get into law given the GOP Senate and the president. Even many Democrats see it as lunacy. But that doesn’t stop Rep. Maxine Waters of CA. Oh no, lunacy is her stock and trade.
She supports the “Promoting Diversity and Inclusion Act of 2019.” Federal bank regulators judge banks by a system known as “CAMELS.” It’s an acronym for capital, assets, management, earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity to risk. Waters wants to add racial and gender quotas to the list.
Yeah, it’s crazy.
And isn’t toying with the natural conditions of finance, like giving cheap home loans to people who wouldn’t usually qualify for them, the kind of thing that brought on the financial crisis of 2008?
Oh sure, the bank has about as much financial credibility as a wet sock. But hey! All is copacetic because the morons who have been running the joint are really really diverse!
Why is it only racial and gender quotas that the left seeks? Why are there no lower middle class workers on the board of Comcast? Why no pro-life conservatives at the top station of Planned Parenthood? I mean, if you really want diversity.
And why do the racial and gender quotas only cut one way? Where are all the NBA players of German heritage, since Americans of that ilk make up a significant portion of the population? I must have missed all the men running the Big Sister organization. No, trans guys don’t count.
MORE NEWS: Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote
All the lawsuits, marches, news specials, and Hollywood blockbusters advocating for more Norwegians in the Congressional Black Caucus must still be on the drawing board.
They have about as much chance to see the light of reality as does this latest idiocy from Maxine Waters. We can be thankful for both those results, as the CBC folks I know would totally not be into sardines.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Mitt Romney hit with new Republican resolution that would force him to support Trump or give up his seat
CNN’s Brian Stelter tries to attack Fox News for ignoring major Trump story – it immediately backfires
Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Report: Florida Boasts About Success Of Their 2-Year Red Flag Law Policy
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-14--Report: Florida Boasts About Success Of Their 2-Year Red Flag Law Policy

I ’ m more interested in knowing how many of the firearms were returned after the owners were deemed not to be a threat .
According to the Associated Press , Florida ’ s “ Red Flag ” laws that have been in place for over two years have removed hundreds of guns .
Republican and conservative Americans have a problem with the “ Red Flag ” process as they feel it an attack on the 2nd amendment .
This “ red flag ” streamlines the “ who cares about Due Process , right ?
” You ’ re guilty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you or has a vendetta against you .
There ’ s nothing more unconstitutional than being guilty and having to prove your innocence .
Our system of law is based on innocent until proven guilty .
MORE NEWS : Ilhan Omar Introduces New Foreign Policy Bills That Would Allow Congress To Restrict Presidential Power Meanwhile , firearms violations occur every day in the U.S. , and federal officials don ’ t enforce laws that would put people in prison and take guns off the streets .
Thousands of illegal firearms have gone to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time .
Where is the law for a mandatory sentence for a stolen or illegal gun ?
Why are the gangs exempt from the laws ?
Red flag laws are effective if you accept the fact that politicians , unlike the rest of us , can look into the future see the crime and prevent it .
The law , supported by legislators of both parties , has been applied more than 3,500 times since , with the pace accelerating during the last half of 2019 .
Even so , an Associated Press @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is inconsistent , with some counties and cities using it rarely and others not at all .
Advocates of Florida ’ s red flag measure say before it existed , it was often difficult to remove firearms from those making threats or suffering severe mental breakdowns .
Investigators did not act on reports that the Parkland shooter was threatening to carry out a school massacre .
But even if they had , it is likely he would have been allowed to keep his guns because he had no felony convictions or involuntary , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri , who leads a commission that investigated the massacre ’ s causes , says the shooter would have easily qualified for a red flag order .
Gualtieri says while it is impossible to say that would have prevented the shooting , the gunman wouldn ’ t have been able to legally buy weapons or ammunition , making his preparation difficult .
“ We have needed this law for decades , ” said Gualtieri , who started a unit in his department that handles only red flag cases .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Bloomberg Fires Back at Trump : New Yorkers ’ Laugh at You & Call You a Carnival Barking Clown ’ What a great thing to brag about .
“ Hundreds of times , the state denied due process to its citizens ?
” Not defending them or what they said or did , but they were denied due process .
It would be interesting to know how many of them were convicted of criminal acts ?
The short of it is that Red Flag laws are inherently flawed .
If a person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t be trusted with a gun , why are they to be trusted in public around your children and family ?
If they have committed a crime , bring them to court , give due process , and jail if guilty .
For laws to work , they must be enforced .
Progressives will see that you can ’ t simultaneously make more stringent laws while being anti-law enforcement .
Existing laws that could have impeded Parkland were never implemented .
Mental illness seems to be at the root of many problems , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t look to arrest homeless people who are breaking any number of laws .
Get rid of guns , and other means of murder will take their place .
Crazies in France demonstrated that all you need is a big truck , which proved to be just as effective .
What People Are Reading On WayneDupree.com • [ VIDEO ] ‘ You ’ d Be Surprised !
’ – Trump Drops a Big Hint on the White House Leaker • Warren Mercilessly Shredded For Bragging About Accepting “ Last $ 3 Dollars @ @ @ @ @ @ @ VIDEO ] Pranksters in Hazmat Suits Scare the Daylights out of NYC Subway Goers by Pretending to “ Spill ” the Coronavirus • [ VIDEO ] Chaos Erupts at Bloomberg Event When Protester Literally Takes Over The Entire Podium

I’m more interested in knowing how many of the firearms were returned after the owners were deemed not to be a threat.
According to the Associated Press, Florida’s “Red Flag” laws that have been in place for over two years have removed hundreds of guns. Republican and conservative Americans have a problem with the “Red Flag” process as they feel it an attack on the 2nd amendment.
This “red flag” streamlines the “who cares about Due Process, right?” You’re guilty if your neighbor doesn’t like you or has a vendetta against you. There’s nothing more unconstitutional than being guilty and having to prove your innocence. Our system of law is based on innocent until proven guilty.
MORE NEWS: Ilhan Omar Introduces New Foreign Policy Bills That Would Allow Congress To Restrict Presidential Power
Meanwhile, firearms violations occur every day in the U.S., and federal officials don’t enforce laws that would put people in prison and take guns off the streets. Thousands of illegal firearms have gone to gang members in the same amount of time. Where is the law for a mandatory sentence for a stolen or illegal gun? Why are the gangs exempt from the laws?
Red flag laws are effective if you accept the fact that politicians, unlike the rest of us, can look into the future see the crime and prevent it.
The law, supported by legislators of both parties , has been applied more than 3,500 times since, with the pace accelerating during the last half of 2019. Even so, an Associated Press analysis of the law showed its use is inconsistent, with some counties and cities using it rarely and others not at all. Advocates of Florida’s red flag measure say before it existed, it was often difficult to remove firearms from those making threats or suffering severe mental breakdowns. Investigators did not act on reports that the Parkland shooter was threatening to carry out a school massacre. But even if they had, it is likely he would have been allowed to keep his guns because he had no felony convictions or involuntary, long-term mental commitments, they say. Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, who leads a commission that investigated the massacre’s causes, says the shooter would have easily qualified for a red flag order. Gualtieri says while it is impossible to say that would have prevented the shooting, the gunman wouldn’t have been able to legally buy weapons or ammunition, making his preparation difficult. “We have needed this law for decades,” said Gualtieri, who started a unit in his department that handles only red flag cases. [Associated Press/ABC Columbia]
MORE NEWS: Bloomberg Fires Back at Trump: New Yorkers’ Laugh at You & Call You a Carnival Barking Clown’
What a great thing to brag about. “Hundreds of times, the state denied due process to its citizens?” Not defending them or what they said or did, but they were denied due process. It would be interesting to know how many of them were convicted of criminal acts?
The short of it is that Red Flag laws are inherently flawed. If a person is dangerous enough that they shouldn’t be trusted with a gun, why are they to be trusted in public around your children and family? If they have committed a crime, bring them to court, give due process, and jail if guilty.
For laws to work, they must be enforced. Progressives will see that you can’t simultaneously make more stringent laws while being anti-law enforcement. Existing laws that could have impeded Parkland were never implemented.
MORE NEWS: Virginia Passes Bill Giving Electoral Votes To Popular Vote Winner
Mental illness seems to be at the root of many problems, including homelessness. Indeed, we don’t look to arrest homeless people who are breaking any number of laws. Get rid of guns, and other means of murder will take their place.
Crazies in France demonstrated that all you need is a big truck, which proved to be just as effective.
What People Are Reading On WayneDupree.com


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-14--Biden Once Again Threatens to Beat Up President Trump

In an interview with the ladies of “ The View , ” Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden once again threatened to beat up President Trump .
It is yet another example of the hypocrisy in the mainstream media when it comes to such rhetoric between Biden and the President .
Had the shoe been on the other foot , Trump would be pilloried in a 24/7 news cycle decrying his calls to violence .
But here – this is just good ol ’ harmless Uncle Joe .
Biden began harmlessly enough by telling the hosts Thursday that he “ can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the debate stage .
From there , things descended into a schoolyard taunt .
RELATED : Joe Biden On Debating Trump : ‘ I Can Hardly Wait ’ In the grand scheme of things , this isn ’ t that big of a deal .
Biden , a protective father , is defending his son Hunter when he resorts to cracking a joke .
The point here is that , while the ladies let out a bit of a laugh at Joe ’ s comments , they ’ d be the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the media – clutching their pearls if President Trump made the same exact joke , word-for-word .
The hosts of the show questioned Biden about the President ’ s frequent mention of Hunter who , a majority of voters think held a scandalous position with a Ukrainian gas company while his father led U.S. foreign policy initiatives as vice president under Barack Obama .
They mentioned Trump ’ s similar belief that Hunter is corrupt and whom he mocks for staying out of the public eye by asking , “ Where ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be able to be back in high school and just have he and I in a room , ” Biden replied .
This isn ’ t even vaguely the first time Biden has threatened President Trump .
He thinks he ’ s ‘ tough guy Joe ’ as opposed to ‘ average Joe.
’ At a campaign stop just weeks ago , Biden told supporters he “ can take a punch ” when it comes to criticism of his family .
“ And if I ’ m the nominee , he ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what punches mean , ” he added .
Of course , we ’ re looking forward to President Trump ’ s response to Biden this time around .
A response that will no doubt make the media apoplectic while Joe ’ s comments go ignored .
Back in 2018 , Biden famously lashed out at Trump saying : “ If we were in high school , I ’ d take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him.
” “ Crazy Joe Biden is trying to act like a tough @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Actually , he is weak , both mentally and physically , and yet he threatens me , for the second time , with physical assault.
” “ He doesn ’ t know me , but he would go down fast and hard , crying all the way .
”

In an interview with the ladies of “The View,” Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden once again threatened to beat up President Trump.
It is yet another example of the hypocrisy in the mainstream media when it comes to such rhetoric between Biden and the President. Had the shoe been on the other foot, Trump would be pilloried in a 24/7 news cycle decrying his calls to violence.
But here – this is just good ol’ harmless Uncle Joe.
Biden began harmlessly enough by telling the hosts Thursday that he “can hardly wait” to get President Trump on the debate stage.
From there, things descended into a schoolyard taunt.
Joe Biden on The View on his son Hunter: “And look, nobody has said he’s done anything wrong. This is a guy who has done nothing but good things his whole life, my son, and ran the food program USA, a whole range of things.”pic.twitter.com/yU1dy628t0 — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) February 13, 2020
RELATED: Joe Biden On Debating Trump: ‘I Can Hardly Wait’
Defending Hunter
In the grand scheme of things, this isn’t that big of a deal. Biden, a protective father, is defending his son Hunter when he resorts to cracking a joke.
The point here is that, while the ladies let out a bit of a laugh at Joe’s comments, they’d be the same people – along with the rest of the media – clutching their pearls if President Trump made the same exact joke, word-for-word.
The hosts of the show questioned Biden about the President’s frequent mention of Hunter who, a majority of voters think held a scandalous position with a Ukrainian gas company while his father led U.S. foreign policy initiatives as vice president under Barack Obama.
They mentioned Trump’s similar belief that Hunter is corrupt and whom he mocks for staying out of the public eye by asking, “Where’s Hunter?”
“I would like to be able to be back in high school and just have he and I in a room,” Biden replied.
Gasp!
Biden on his anger at Trump: “I would like to be back in high school and just have he and I in a room.” “It is hurtful, particularly when guys like Lindsey Graham, who was a friend of mine. … I plan on being president, and presidents can’t hold grudges. You’ve got to heal.” — Eric Bradner (@ericbradner) February 13, 2020
RELATED: Joe Biden Suggests Union President Should Rough Up Republican Lawmaker Kevin Cramer
Tough Guy Joe
This isn’t even vaguely the first time Biden has threatened President Trump. He thinks he’s ‘tough guy Joe’ as opposed to ‘average Joe.’
At a campaign stop just weeks ago, Biden told supporters he “can take a punch” when it comes to criticism of his family.
“And if I’m the nominee, he’s [Trump] going to understand what punches mean,” he added.
.@JoeBiden says of President Trump: As much as he’s trying to destroy me and my family – I hope I’ve demonstrated I can take a punch and if I’m our nominee, he’s gonna understand what punches mean. — Arlette Saenz (@ArletteSaenz) January 27, 2020
Of course, we’re looking forward to President Trump’s response to Biden this time around. A response that will no doubt make the media apoplectic while Joe’s comments go ignored.
Back in 2018, Biden famously lashed out at Trump saying: “If we were in high school, I’d take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him.”
Trump’s response was legendary …
“Crazy Joe Biden is trying to act like a tough guy,” he replied. “Actually, he is weak, both mentally and physically, and yet he threatens me, for the second time, with physical assault.”
“He doesn’t know me, but he would go down fast and hard, crying all the way.”


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-14--Manchin Comes Crawling Back After Trump Guilty Vote

By making the vote to acquit the president a partisan affair , and making the guilty vote a bipartisan action with the Romney defection , Joe Manchin had to know there would be a price to pay .
We did a piece on it in LifeZette .
It was obvious , as he had teased he might vote to acquit .
So now his olive branches to the White House just look like pathetic groveling .
Also , according to LifeZette sources on Capitol Hill , the phones have been ringing off the hook in Manchin ’ s office and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not been pretty .
Calls are running over 2 to 1 for the president and against Manchin on the vote .
MORE NEWS : Disturbing new report reveals FBI had multiple informants in Trump ’ s presidential campaign Oh no , says Joe .
Everything is hunky dory .
He and president will soon be buds again .
So not to burden with a lot of his blather , his rationale for the optimism is that when Trump did his best to unseat Manchin in 2018 they had lunch a week after his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is just a game on the part of the president and soon bygones will bygones .
Manchin said one of the reasons he voted guilty was because he didn ’ t like the president ’ s message at the State of the Union address the night before his impeachment vote , “ I saw the State of the Union , and I said : ‘ It ’ s not who we are.
’ There ’ s so many good things that we can do better .
I hope he changes , ” he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ looking for that person that has heart and soul and compassion.
” So the president does not currently have “ heart , and soul and compassion ” according to the senator .
But Manchin expects it to suddenly appear in his case ?
Oh , of course .
That ’ s a gim me because we all know Donald Trump is politically easygoing .
Doesn ’ t hold grudges at all .
Nahhhh… MORE NEWS : Biden stuns New Hampshire voter by calling her a ‘ lying , dog-faced pony soldier ’ Lindsey @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between the two .
He correctly points out that the GOP , with 53 votes , will need Democrat votes to achieve 60 and get GOP and presidential legislation out of the Senate and to the president ’ s desk for signature into law .
That ’ s true .
But it may be up to the GOP Senate to make nice with Manchin right now .
If Trump acts like Trump , always a good bet , then Manchin still has some time left in the dog house .
This piece originally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ permission .
Read more at LifeZette : Mitt Romney hit with new Republican resolution that would force him to support Trump or give up his seat CNN ’ s Brian Stelter tries to attack Fox News for ignoring major Trump story – it immediately backfires Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi

By David Kamioner | February 14, 2020
By making the vote to acquit the president a partisan affair, and making the guilty vote a bipartisan action with the Romney defection, Joe Manchin had to know there would be a price to pay.
We did a piece on it in LifeZette. It was obvious, as he had teased he might vote to acquit. So now his olive branches to the White House just look like pathetic groveling.
Also, according to LifeZette sources on Capitol Hill, the phones have been ringing off the hook in Manchin’s office and the response to his guilty vote has not been pretty. Calls are running over 2 to 1 for the president and against Manchin on the vote.
MORE NEWS: Disturbing new report reveals FBI had multiple informants in Trump’s presidential campaign
Oh no, says Joe. Everything is hunky dory. He and president will soon be buds again.
So not to burden with a lot of his blather, his rationale for the optimism is that when Trump did his best to unseat Manchin in 2018 they had lunch a week after his reelection. The insinuation is that this is just a game on the part of the president and soon bygones will bygones.
But hold on.
Manchin said one of the reasons he voted guilty was because he didn’t like the president’s message at the State of the Union address the night before his impeachment vote, “I saw the State of the Union, and I said: ‘It’s not who we are.’ There’s so many good things that we can do better. I hope he changes,” he told Politico. “I’m looking for that person that has heart and soul and compassion.”
So the president does not currently have “heart, and soul and compassion” according to the senator. But Manchin expects it to suddenly appear in his case? Oh, of course. That’s a gimme because we all know Donald Trump is politically easygoing. Doesn’t hold grudges at all. Nahhhh…
MORE NEWS: Biden stuns New Hampshire voter by calling her a ‘lying, dog-faced pony soldier’
Lindsey Graham is trying to smooth over feathers between the two. He correctly points out that the GOP, with 53 votes, will need Democrat votes to achieve 60 and get GOP and presidential legislation out of the Senate and to the president’s desk for signature into law.
That’s true. But it may be up to the GOP Senate to make nice with Manchin right now. If Trump acts like Trump, always a good bet, then Manchin still has some time left in the dog house.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Mitt Romney hit with new Republican resolution that would force him to support Trump or give up his seat
CNN’s Brian Stelter tries to attack Fox News for ignoring major Trump story – it immediately backfires
Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Joe Biden On Debating Trump: ‘I Can Hardly Wait’
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-14--CNN Caught Hiding Key Information About Roger Stone Juror

CNN has been exposed as fake news once again after they were caught hiding a crucial detail about a biased juror in the Roger Stone trial .
Back in November , former Donald Trump associate Stone was convicted of obstruction , witness tampering , and five counts of making false statements to Congress , according to The Daily Caller .
Prosecutors recommended a sentence of nine years , which many including President Trump felt was outrageous , so the Department of Justice has since intervened to lessen it .
It was revealed this week that one of the jurors in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ran for Congress as a Democrat and constantly posts her radically anti-Trump views on social media .
On Tuesday , she even took to her personal Facebook page to praise the four prosecutors who withdrew after the DOJ intervened to revise Stone ’ s sentence .
CNN did not include any of this background information in their article “ Stone juror says she ‘ stands with ’ the prosecutors , ” which was posted on Wednesday .
Instead , they focused only on Hart ’ s post , saying that she wants to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prosecutors .
“ I want to stand up for Aaron Zelinsky , Adam Jed , Michael Marando , and Jonathan Kravis — the prosecutors on the Roger Stone trial , ” Hart wrote in the Facebook post .
“ It pains me to see the DOJ now interfere with the hard work of the prosecutors .
They acted with the utmost intelligence , integrity , and respect for our system of justice .
As foreperson , I made sure we went through every element , of every charge , matching the evidence presented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ return a conviction of guilty on all 7 counts.
” A brief examination of Hart ’ s social media accounts make it clear that she is someone who followed the special counsel ’ s investigation closely , so she undoubtedly knew all about Stone before being named to his jury .
In fact , Hart retweeted CNN analyst Bakari Sellers ’ attack on Stone defenders after he was arrested in January of last year .
She also is a frequent Trump basher who has even called him “ # KlanPresident ” at times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information that should have been included in CNN ’ s article , yet they featured none of it .
This just goes to show that Trump has been right all along : CNN really is fake news .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : CNN ’ s Brian Stelter tries to attack Fox News for ignoring major Trump story – it immediately backfires Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi Bette Midler comes unhinged with attack on ‘ polite ’ Dems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thing ’ – ‘ men like to kill each other ’

By PoliZette Staff | February 14, 2020
CNN has been exposed as fake news once again after they were caught hiding a crucial detail about a biased juror in the Roger Stone trial.
Back in November, former Donald Trump associate Stone was convicted of obstruction, witness tampering, and five counts of making false statements to Congress, according to The Daily Caller. Prosecutors recommended a sentence of nine years, which many including President Trump felt was outrageous, so the Department of Justice has since intervened to lessen it.
It was revealed this week that one of the jurors in the case, Tomeka Hart, previously ran for Congress as a Democrat and constantly posts her radically anti-Trump views on social media. On Tuesday, she even took to her personal Facebook page to praise the four prosecutors who withdrew after the DOJ intervened to revise Stone’s sentence.
CNN did not include any of this background information in their article “Stone juror says she ‘stands with’ the prosecutors,” which was posted on Wednesday. Instead, they focused only on Hart’s post, saying that she wants to “stand up” for the four prosecutors.
“I want to stand up for Aaron Zelinsky, Adam Jed, Michael Marando, and Jonathan Kravis — the prosecutors on the Roger Stone trial,” Hart wrote in the Facebook post. “It pains me to see the DOJ now interfere with the hard work of the prosecutors. They acted with the utmost intelligence, integrity, and respect for our system of justice. As foreperson, I made sure we went through every element, of every charge, matching the evidence presented in the case that led us to return a conviction of guilty on all 7 counts.”
A brief examination of Hart’s social media accounts make it clear that she is someone who followed the special counsel’s investigation closely, so she undoubtedly knew all about Stone before being named to his jury. In fact, Hart retweeted CNN analyst Bakari Sellers’ attack on Stone defenders after he was arrested in January of last year.
She also is a frequent Trump basher who has even called him “#KlanPresident” at times.
All of this is crucial background information that should have been included in CNN’s article, yet they featured none of it. This just goes to show that Trump has been right all along: CNN really is fake news.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
CNN’s Brian Stelter tries to attack Fox News for ignoring major Trump story – it immediately backfires
Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
Bette Midler comes unhinged with attack on ‘polite’ Dems who ‘haven’t learned a thing’ – ‘men like to kill each other’
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Disgraced Lawyer Michael Avenatti Found Guilty of Extortion
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-14--Warren Comforts Supporters After New Hampshire Defeat By Saying Breathe Deep, Eat Chocolate, And ‘Hu

Warren Comforts Supporters After New Hampshire Defeat By Saying Breathe Deep, Eat Chocolate, And ‘Hug Your Pet’

Sen. Elizabeth Warren ( D-MA ) was humiliated last week when she came in fourth in the New Hampshire primary behind her fellow candidates Sen. Bernie Sanders ( D-VT ) , Pete Buttigieg , and Sen. Amy Klobuchar ( D-MN ) .
Afterwards , Warren sent an email to her supporters that was nothing short of pathetic , as she tried to comfort them by telling them to do things like hug a pet , eat chocolate , and “ watch videos of cats and dogs who are friends.
” No , this is not a joke .
“ Last @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we wanted it to go , ” Warren wrote in her sorrowful email .
“ We were hoping for a better resulting New Hampshire , and a lot of volunteers and grassroots supporters fought really hard to make it happen.
” MORE NEWS : Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote “ It hurts to cares much , work so hard , and still fall a little short , ” she continued , telling her supporters that it is “ okay to take a moment and feel that pain or process that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ways to cope with the results .
“ Take a walk around the block , eat an extra piece of chocolate , hug your pet , adopt a pet , watch videos of cats and dogs who are friends , call a friend — whatever works , ” the email states .
“ But once you ’ ve let it all out , take a deep breath , square our shoulders , and make a plan — a plan to fight back and win .
A plan to help make sure that we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way again.
” The email reads like a parody of a liberal snowflake .
Warren is essentially telling her supporters to run and hide in their safe spaces while they grieve her horrible showing in New Hampshire .
President Donald Trump would never send an email to his supporters telling them to “ watch videos of cats and dogs who are friends.
” We need a strong leader like him to lead our nation through the tough times , not a president who will tell us to hug our pets when things get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : CNN ’ s Brian Stelter tries to attack Fox News for ignoring major Trump story – it immediately backfires Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi Bette Midler comes unhinged with attack on ‘ polite ’ Dems who ‘ haven ’ t learned a thing ’ – ‘ men like to kill each other ’

By PoliZette Staff | February 14, 2020
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) was humiliated last week when she came in fourth in the New Hampshire primary behind her fellow candidates Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT), Pete Buttigieg, and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN). Afterwards, Warren sent an email to her supporters that was nothing short of pathetic, as she tried to comfort them by telling them to do things like hug a pet, eat chocolate, and “watch videos of cats and dogs who are friends.”
No, this is not a joke.
“Last night didn’t go the way we wanted it to go,” Warren wrote in her sorrowful email. “We were hoping for a better resulting New Hampshire, and a lot of volunteers and grassroots supporters fought really hard to make it happen.”
MORE NEWS: Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote
“It hurts to cares much, work so hard, and still fall a little short,” she continued, telling her supporters that it is “okay to take a moment and feel that pain or process that disappointment” before listing a variety of ways to cope with the results.
“Take a walk around the block, eat an extra piece of chocolate, hug your pet, adopt a pet, watch videos of cats and dogs who are friends, call a friend — whatever works,” the email states. “But once you’ve let it all out, take a deep breath, square our shoulders, and make a plan — a plan to fight back and win. A plan to help make sure that we won’t have to feel this way again.”
I can't imagine another candidate sending an email like this. I love her. pic.twitter.com/Unz2EIhivW — Courtney Enlow (@courtenlow) February 12, 2020
MORE NEWS: Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
The email reads like a parody of a liberal snowflake. Warren is essentially telling her supporters to run and hide in their safe spaces while they grieve her horrible showing in New Hampshire.
President Donald Trump would never send an email to his supporters telling them to “watch videos of cats and dogs who are friends.” We need a strong leader like him to lead our nation through the tough times, not a president who will tell us to hug our pets when things get rough.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
CNN’s Brian Stelter tries to attack Fox News for ignoring major Trump story – it immediately backfires
Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
Bette Midler comes unhinged with attack on ‘polite’ Dems who ‘haven’t learned a thing’ – ‘men like to kill each other’
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com DOJ Investigating if Obama Admin Officials Hid Evidence of Russian Election Interference
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-16--Thin-Skinned AOC Begins Reelection Bid, Republicans Can Take Advantage

Conservative icon Bill Buckley once said he would have a U.S. Senate composed of all conservatives , and Ted Kennedy .
Kennedy would remain as a reminder to the American people of the views of the hard left , thus insuring conservative senatorial hegemony .
The same may be said of Dem Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of NY , “ AOC ” in political shorthand .
With all due respect to the noble GOP challengers and even the Dems trying to take her out in the primary , she ’ s got a leg up on them .
Her screeching fame @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign ammo , she certainly has the energy for the race , and her bakers dozen primary opponents will just split up any anti-AOC vote in small increments leaving her to possibly win with nowhere near a majority .
The seat is also a Dem gim me .
However , that doesn ’ t mean the good guys shouldn ’ t fight it .
We just shouldn ’ t expect her to lose .
But in that win , we can profit .
One , by making her an example as noted above @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bronx bartender ’ s primary opponents as many indirect resources as we can muster .
Because their refusal to bow down to her will irritate her to no end and motivate her to do and say loony stuff .
She may utter some of that craziness against her own party establishment .
We can then use the lines in the fall against the same Dem stalwarts on a national basis .
Then whoever grabs the GOP nomination needs to have enough cash and staff to run a political commando op .
A hit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Since the GOP team will be liberated from trying to win they can focus on getting AOC mad in a series of stick and move message assaults .
This will push the thin-skinned AOC to even more flights of lunacy .
Those batty lines then can be used to nationally advocate for a GOP House , if AOC and her types are the alternative .
That tactic could play well for the Republicans in close House races across the country .
So we ’ ll need a berserker , a person who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way mission they can leverage later into a posh spot in the Trump administration , to fight the GOP November effort and a team that pulls no punches .
Given what AOC herself consistently says , she wants a slugfest against the party of Donald Trump .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : US Navy seizes Iranian weapons bound for Yemen , no Obama surrender to Iran this time Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations San Fran Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that helped Kamala Harris

By David Kamioner | February 16, 2020
Conservative icon Bill Buckley once said he would have a U.S. Senate composed of all conservatives, and Ted Kennedy. Kennedy would remain as a reminder to the American people of the views of the hard left, thus insuring conservative senatorial hegemony.
The same may be said of Dem Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of NY, “AOC” in political shorthand.
With all due respect to the noble GOP challengers and even the Dems trying to take her out in the primary, she’s got a leg up on them. Her screeching fame has brought her $5 million in campaign ammo, she certainly has the energy for the race, and her bakers dozen primary opponents will just split up any anti-AOC vote in small increments leaving her to possibly win with nowhere near a majority.
The seat is also a Dem gimme.
However, that doesn’t mean the good guys shouldn’t fight it. We just shouldn’t expect her to lose. But in that win, we can profit.
MORE NEWS: Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
One, by making her an example as noted above. Two, by giving the ultratouchy Bronx bartender’s primary opponents as many indirect resources as we can muster. Because their refusal to bow down to her will irritate her to no end and motivate her to do and say loony stuff. She may utter some of that craziness against her own party establishment. We can then use the lines in the fall against the same Dem stalwarts on a national basis.
Then whoever grabs the GOP nomination needs to have enough cash and staff to run a political commando op. A hit and run, a shoot and scoot. Since the GOP team will be liberated from trying to win they can focus on getting AOC mad in a series of stick and move message assaults. This will push the thin-skinned AOC to even more flights of lunacy. Those batty lines then can be used to nationally advocate for a GOP House, if AOC and her types are the alternative.
That tactic could play well for the Republicans in close House races across the country.
So we’ll need a berserker, a person who has no problem with a political one way mission they can leverage later into a posh spot in the Trump administration, to fight the GOP November effort and a team that pulls no punches.
Given what AOC herself consistently says, she wants a slugfest against the party of Donald Trump.
Let’s give her one.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
US Navy seizes Iranian weapons bound for Yemen, no Obama surrender to Iran this time
Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations
San Fran Democrats admit to various sexcapades, an affair that helped Kamala Harris
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com DOJ Launches Investigation Into Former Top FBI Officials James Comey, Peter Strzok, And Andrew McCabe
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-16--DOJ Launches Investigation Into Former Top FBI Officials James Comey, Peter Strzok, And Andrew McCab

DOJ Launches Investigation Into Former Top FBI Officials James Comey, Peter Strzok, And Andrew McCabe

An official with the Department of Justice has confirmed that a new investigation has been launched into multiple former top FBI officials , including James Comey , Andrew McCabe , and Peter Strzok .
Andrew Weissmann , a former top lawyer in the DOJ who played a major role in Robert Mueller ’ s investigation , told MSNBC host Chuck Todd on Friday that the Justice Department has launched a new investigation into Comey , McCabe , and Strzok .
He explained that the new case replaced the “ loser case ” against McCabe , in which the DOJ decided @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lying to investigators .
“ All they did was swapped out a loser case for starting an investigation that is going to be of Comey , McCabe , Pete Strzok , ” Weissmann said , according to The Washington Examiner .
All three of these officials played some kind of role in the investigation into President Donald Trump ’ s alleged collusion with Russia during the 2016 presidential election .
The investigation ended with no evidence of collusion being found , much to the dismay of Democrats .
MORE NEWS : Disturbing new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump ’ s presidential campaign The new investigation is being led by Jeffrey Jensen , the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri , who was picked by Attorney General William Barr .
Weissman , who is now a legal analyst for NBC News , described the appointment of Jensen as “ interesting ” given the fact that the judge who presided over the case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn had shot down claims that Flynn was set up by the FBI after going over the facts of the investigation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to lying to investigators about discussions he ’ d had with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak about U.S. sanctions on the nation .
“ What I would love to know is what the factual predicate , given that Judge Sullivan has found nothing there , ” Weissman said .
Comey , McCabe , and Strzok have all shown time and time again that they are as crooked as they come .
We ’ re glad to see that the Department of Justice will be looking into them once again with this new investigation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : US Navy seizes Iranian weapons bound for Yemen , no Obama surrender to Iran this time Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations San Fran Democrats admit to various sexcapades , an affair that helped Kamala Harris

By PoliZette Staff | February 16, 2020
An official with the Department of Justice has confirmed that a new investigation has been launched into multiple former top FBI officials, including James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Peter Strzok.
Andrew Weissmann, a former top lawyer in the DOJ who played a major role in Robert Mueller’s investigation, told MSNBC host Chuck Todd on Friday that the Justice Department has launched a new investigation into Comey, McCabe, and Strzok. He explained that the new case replaced the “loser case” against McCabe, in which the DOJ decided not to pursue charges against McCabe for lying to investigators.
“All they did was swapped out a loser case for starting an investigation that is going to be of Comey, McCabe, Pete Strzok,” Weissmann said, according to The Washington Examiner.
All three of these officials played some kind of role in the investigation into President Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia during the 2016 presidential election. The investigation ended with no evidence of collusion being found, much to the dismay of Democrats.
MORE NEWS: Disturbing new report reveals FBI had multiple informants in Trump’s presidential campaign
The new investigation is being led by Jeffrey Jensen, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, who was picked by Attorney General William Barr. Weissman, who is now a legal analyst for NBC News, described the appointment of Jensen as “interesting” given the fact that the judge who presided over the case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn had shot down claims that Flynn was set up by the FBI after going over the facts of the investigation.
Three years ago, Flynn pled guilty to lying to investigators about discussions he’d had with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak about U.S. sanctions on the nation.
“What I would love to know is what the factual predicate, given that Judge Sullivan has found nothing there,” Weissman said.
Comey, McCabe, and Strzok have all shown time and time again that they are as crooked as they come. We’re glad to see that the Department of Justice will be looking into them once again with this new investigation.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
US Navy seizes Iranian weapons bound for Yemen, no Obama surrender to Iran this time
Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations
San Fran Democrats admit to various sexcapades, an affair that helped Kamala Harris
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com For Hitting Hillary, Media Blacks Out Tulsi Gabbard Campaign
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-16--Government Watchdog Group Confirms There Is ‘Strong Evidence Of Criminal Misconduct By Hunter Biden

Tom Fitton , the president of government watchdog group Judicial Watch , has just spoken out to say that there is “ strong evidence of criminal misconduct ” by Hunter Biden in regards to his business dealings with Ukraine .
This comes as the U.S. Treasury Department has been turning over confidential bank records related to Biden to various Senate investigative committees that are looking into his activities .
These documents are known as “ suspicious activity reports , ” or “ banking alerts involving money laundering or fraud , related to Biden and his associates , ” according to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that these Senate investigative committees have also requested that the Secret Service to turn over Biden ’ s travel records , adding that this could be the beginning of a major criminal investigation .
“ This would be the basic investigative work one would do if you were trying to figure out where Hunter Biden was and who he was traveling with during the Obama presidency , ” Fitton said .
Fitton went on to question Biden ’ s role in Burisma .
“ There ’ s no evidence that it was a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the background or capability to serve on the board , ” he said , adding that “ the payments were out of the ordinary and extraordinary , suggesting some other improprieties .
Now we have Rudy Giuliani with documents , some of them from court cases here in the United States , suggesting that money he was receiving was , in part , laundered.
” A new Politico/Morning Consult survey shows that most Americans agree with Fitton , with 52 percent of voters saying it was inappropriate for Biden to take his job @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 18 percent said it was appropriate for him to do so .
Fitton also called on government investigators to look into former Vice President Joe Biden ’ s travels to China , which is another nation his son was working in .
Because of his father ’ s position in the Democratic Party , Hunter Biden has gotten a free pass in terms of his nefarious activities for years .
It ’ s time for him to be held accountable for what he did , and for these Senate investigative activities to show @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : US Navy seizes Iranian weapons bound for Yemen , no Obama surrender to Iran this time Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations San Fran Democrats admit to various sexcapades , an affair that helped Kamala Harris

By PoliZette Staff | February 16, 2020
Tom Fitton, the president of government watchdog group Judicial Watch, has just spoken out to say that there is “strong evidence of criminal misconduct” by Hunter Biden in regards to his business dealings with Ukraine.
This comes as the U.S. Treasury Department has been turning over confidential bank records related to Biden to various Senate investigative committees that are looking into his activities. These documents are known as “suspicious activity reports,” or “banking alerts involving money laundering or fraud, related to Biden and his associates,” according to The Washington Examiner.
Fitton pointed out that these Senate investigative committees have also requested that the Secret Service to turn over Biden’s travel records, adding that this could be the beginning of a major criminal investigation.
“This would be the basic investigative work one would do if you were trying to figure out where Hunter Biden was and who he was traveling with during the Obama presidency,” Fitton said.
MORE NEWS: Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
Fitton went on to question Biden’s role in Burisma.
“There’s no evidence that it was a legitimate business relationship or that Biden had the background or capability to serve on the board,” he said, adding that “the payments were out of the ordinary and extraordinary, suggesting some other improprieties. Now we have Rudy Giuliani with documents, some of them from court cases here in the United States, suggesting that money he was receiving was, in part, laundered.”
“This Biden scandal ain’t going away,” Fitton said.
A new Politico/Morning Consult survey shows that most Americans agree with Fitton, with 52 percent of voters saying it was inappropriate for Biden to take his job with Burisma. In contrast, just 18 percent said it was appropriate for him to do so.
Fitton also called on government investigators to look into former Vice President Joe Biden’s travels to China, which is another nation his son was working in.
Because of his father’s position in the Democratic Party, Hunter Biden has gotten a free pass in terms of his nefarious activities for years. It’s time for him to be held accountable for what he did, and for these Senate investigative activities to show the world that nobody is above the law.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
US Navy seizes Iranian weapons bound for Yemen, no Obama surrender to Iran this time
Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations
San Fran Democrats admit to various sexcapades, an affair that helped Kamala Harris
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com New Mexico State Employee ‘Heavily Involved’ With Democrats Is Arrested For Allegedly Vandalizing GOP Facility
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-16--New Mexico State Employee ‘Heavily Involved’ With Democrats Is Arrested For Allegedly Vandalizing GO

New Mexico State Employee ‘Heavily Involved’ With Democrats Is Arrested For Allegedly Vandalizing GOP Facility

A state employee of New Mexico who previously interned with Democratic Gov .
Michelle Lujan Grisham was just arrested for allegedly vandalizing the state ’ s GOP headquarters in Albuquerque .
Cameron Chase McCall was spotted on surveillance footage spray painting the words “ Still Traitors ” on a building last week , police said .
“ The [ criminal ] complaint says McCall is heavily involved with the Democratic Party , ” KOAT-TV reported .
McCall has been placed on leave from his job at Expo New Mexico , and a spokesman for them said that he will likely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be the person in the video .
GOP staffers said that it will cost about $ 4,000 to repair the vandalism , according to The Blaze .
A spokesman for Governor Grisham confirmed that McCall had once interned with her , and said that she condemned the vandalism as unacceptable behavior .
“ It ’ s flatly unacceptable behavior , ” the spokesman said in a statement .
“ The suspect was an intern in her Congressional office for a brief period , and that fact amplifies her already extreme disappointment in what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for this kind of juvenile nonsense in our politics – and it is entirely out of step with what the governor expects of employees , whether past , present or future.
” Police are now trying to figure out if McCall is the same individual who spray painted the word “ traitors ” on the GOP headquarters last March .
It was after this vandalism that Republicans decided to install cameras at their facility .
McCall has been released on bond since he had no prior arrests .
If a Republican operative had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democratic headquarters , it would be a national news story picked up by the mainstream media to show how “ deranged ” the right is .
Since it was a leftist who committed this crime , however , it ’ s not being reported at all on a national level .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : US Navy seizes Iranian weapons bound for Yemen , no Obama surrender to Iran this time Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sexcapades , an affair that helped Kamala Harris

By PoliZette Staff | February 16, 2020
A state employee of New Mexico who previously interned with Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham was just arrested for allegedly vandalizing the state’s GOP headquarters in Albuquerque.
Cameron Chase McCall was spotted on surveillance footage spray painting the words “Still Traitors” on a building last week, police said.
“The [criminal] complaint says McCall is heavily involved with the Democratic Party,” KOAT-TV reported.
McCall has been placed on leave from his job at Expo New Mexico, and a spokesman for them said that he will likely be terminated if he is proven to be the person in the video. GOP staffers said that it will cost about $4,000 to repair the vandalism, according to The Blaze.
A spokesman for Governor Grisham confirmed that McCall had once interned with her, and said that she condemned the vandalism as unacceptable behavior.
“It’s flatly unacceptable behavior,” the spokesman said in a statement. “The suspect was an intern in her Congressional office for a brief period, and that fact amplifies her already extreme disappointment in what took place. There is no space for this kind of juvenile nonsense in our politics – and it is entirely out of step with what the governor expects of employees, whether past, present or future.”
Police are now trying to figure out if McCall is the same individual who spray painted the word “traitors” on the GOP headquarters last March. It was after this vandalism that Republicans decided to install cameras at their facility.
McCall has been released on bond since he had no prior arrests.
If a Republican operative had been arrested for doing this to a Democratic headquarters, it would be a national news story picked up by the mainstream media to show how “deranged” the right is. Since it was a leftist who committed this crime, however, it’s not being reported at all on a national level.
Ah, the hypocrisy of liberals.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
US Navy seizes Iranian weapons bound for Yemen, no Obama surrender to Iran this time
Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations
San Fran Democrats admit to various sexcapades, an affair that helped Kamala Harris
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Democrat Cold War Heats Up As Sanders Targets Bloomberg
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-15--Bloomberg Reportedly Thinking About Making Hillary His Vice President

New reports are indicating that 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg , the former mayor of New York City , is considering making failed 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton his vice presidential pick .
An unnamed source within Bloomberg ’ s campaign reportedly told The Drudge Report that they were considering Clinton after polls they conducted internally found that a Bloomberg-Clinton ticket would be a “ formidable force.
” Drudge Report added that Bloomberg is even considering changing his residence from New York to a home he owns in Colorado or Florida , “ since the electoral college makes it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same state.
” “ Under the Twelfth Amendment to the US Constitution , which provides the procedure for electing the president and vice-president , it states that the two people could not both inhabit the same state as the elector , ” Daily Mail reported .
The Bloomberg campaign quickly spoke out to deny the report that he was already considering Clinton , however .
MORE NEWS : Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote “ We are focused on the primary and the debate , not VP speculation , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Earlier this month , Clinton was asked by Ellen DeGeneres if she would consider running alongside one of the Democratic presidential candidates as a Vice President , and she stopped just short of saying she would .
“ I never say never because I do believe in serving my country , but it ’ s not going to happen , ” Clinton replied .
Last month , Donald Trump claimed that Clinton had promised Bloomberg the position of Secretary of State if she had won the 2016 election .
“ He had a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to become secretary of State .
It was very simple .
People knew that , ” Trump said , adding that she never actually intended to follow through with this deal .
“ Wasn ’ t going to happen .
It was going to go to Terry McAuliffe , ” Trump said , referring to the former Virginia governor who is a close friend of the Clintons .
“ I mean , so they were playing with Michael .
And – it ’ s too bad , but he ’ s spending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cut from the same cloth as members of the New York liberal elite , so it would come as no surprise if they decide to run together against Trump .
Given how much Bloomberg is struggling in the race so far , however , it would be something of a surprise if he even gets far enough to name a running mate .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi Three House Dems on Judiciary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crawling back after Trump guilty vote

By PoliZette Staff | February 15, 2020
New reports are indicating that 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York City, is considering making failed 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton his vice presidential pick.
An unnamed source within Bloomberg’s campaign reportedly told The Drudge Report that they were considering Clinton after polls they conducted internally found that a Bloomberg-Clinton ticket would be a “formidable force.” Drudge Report added that Bloomberg is even considering changing his residence from New York to a home he owns in Colorado or Florida, “since the electoral college makes it hard for a POTUS and VPOTUS from the same state.”
“Under the Twelfth Amendment to the US Constitution, which provides the procedure for electing the president and vice-president, it states that the two people could not both inhabit the same state as the elector,” Daily Mail reported.
The Bloomberg campaign quickly spoke out to deny the report that he was already considering Clinton, however.
MORE NEWS: Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote
“We are focused on the primary and the debate, not VP speculation,” said Bloomberg communication director Jason Schechter.
Earlier this month, Clinton was asked by Ellen DeGeneres if she would consider running alongside one of the Democratic presidential candidates as a Vice President, and she stopped just short of saying she would.
“I never say never because I do believe in serving my country, but it’s not going to happen,” Clinton replied.
Last month, Donald Trump claimed that Clinton had promised Bloomberg the position of Secretary of State if she had won the 2016 election.
“He had a deal with Hillary Clinton that he was going to become secretary of State. It was very simple. People knew that,” Trump said, adding that she never actually intended to follow through with this deal.
“Wasn’t going to happen. It was going to go to Terry McAuliffe,” Trump said, referring to the former Virginia governor who is a close friend of the Clintons. “I mean, so they were playing with Michael. And – it’s too bad, but he’s spending a fortune.”
Clinton and Bloomberg are cut from the same cloth as members of the New York liberal elite, so it would come as no surprise if they decide to run together against Trump. Given how much Bloomberg is struggling in the race so far, however, it would be something of a surprise if he even gets far enough to name a running mate.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations
Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com San Fran Democrats Admit To Various Sexcapades, An Affair That Helped Kamala Harris
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-15--San Fran Democrats Admit To Various Sexcapades, An Affair That Helped Kamala Harris

With a city reputation for alternate lifestyles , two mayors of San Francisco have come clean on mundane conventional romantic adventures .
One , a past mayor , only confirmed what was already widely suspected and snickered about .
The other , the current mayor , is in hot water over hers .
It is no great epiphany to learn that past San Fran mayor Democrat Willie Brown had an extramarital relationship with present U.S .
Senator and past presidential candidate Kamala Harris of California .
Brown is thirty years her senior .
“ We dated .
It was more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recently said Brown .
He was married at the time .
But the comely Harris apparently did not find that an obstacle to dating .
“ Yes , I may have influenced her career by appointing her to two state commissions when I was Assembly speaker , ” said Brown , also commenting that he helped other area politicians as well .
“ The difference is that Harris is the only one who , after I helped her , sent word that I would be indicted if I ‘ so much as jaywalked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s politics for you.
” Upon hearing that Harris responded , “ His career is over ; I will be alive and kicking for the next 40 years .
I do not owe him a thing , ” she told a local magazine , vowing , “ If there is corruption , it will be prosecuted.
” The current mayor ’ s travails are not nearly as fun .
San Fran Democrat Mayor London Breed also dated a guy twenty years ago .
After they broke up they stayed friends .
Breed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ She then borrowed over $ 5,000 from him in 2019 for a car repair .
She hasn ’ t paid him back yet .
A relatively small loan between pals .
So , no big deal , right ?
MORE NEWS : Buttigieg hit by New Hampshire feminists Yup , except that past paramour Mohammed Nuru is a former director of city public works who is now under indictment for corruption .
She talked about the intimate relationship Friday and said she was never asked to do anything improper for the loan .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of America ’ s biggest cities , and certainly one of its richest cities , could not afford a car repair .
No matter the details , other city officials want her scalp .
City Supervisor Gordon Mar had this to say , “ ” Mayor Breed ’ s admission of thousands of dollars in unreported gifts from a subordinate is likely illegal , certainly unethical , and part of a culture of casual corruption that is eroding the faith of the public…I believe Mayor Breed should do the right thing and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a full , independent investigation can be completed.
” Gee , I wonder what job Gordon sees himself in soon , eh ?
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote

By David Kamioner | February 15, 2020
With a city reputation for alternate lifestyles, two mayors of San Francisco have come clean on mundane conventional romantic adventures. One, a past mayor, only confirmed what was already widely suspected and snickered about. The other, the current mayor, is in hot water over hers.
It is no great epiphany to learn that past San Fran mayor Democrat Willie Brown had an extramarital relationship with present U.S. Senator and past presidential candidate Kamala Harris of California. Brown is thirty years her senior.
“We dated. It was more than twenty years ago,” very recently said Brown. He was married at the time. But the comely Harris apparently did not find that an obstacle to dating.
MORE NEWS: Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
“Yes, I may have influenced her career by appointing her to two state commissions when I was Assembly speaker,” said Brown, also commenting that he helped other area politicians as well. “The difference is that Harris is the only one who, after I helped her, sent word that I would be indicted if I ‘so much as jaywalked’ while she was D.A. That’s politics for you.”
Upon hearing that Harris responded, “His career is over; I will be alive and kicking for the next 40 years. I do not owe him a thing,” she told a local magazine, vowing, “If there is corruption, it will be prosecuted.”
Mee-oww.
The current mayor’s travails are not nearly as fun.
San Fran Democrat Mayor London Breed also dated a guy twenty years ago. After they broke up they stayed friends. Breed was first elected mayor in 2018. She then borrowed over $5,000 from him in 2019 for a car repair. She hasn’t paid him back yet. A relatively small loan between pals. So, no big deal, right?
MORE NEWS: Buttigieg hit by New Hampshire feminists
Yup, except that past paramour Mohammed Nuru is a former director of city public works who is now under indictment for corruption. She talked about the intimate relationship Friday and said she was never asked to do anything improper for the loan. Though some wonder why the mayor of one of America’s biggest cities, and certainly one of its richest cities, could not afford a car repair.
No matter the details, other city officials want her scalp. City Supervisor Gordon Mar had this to say, “”Mayor Breed’s admission of thousands of dollars in unreported gifts from a subordinate is likely illegal, certainly unethical, and part of a culture of casual corruption that is eroding the faith of the public…I believe Mayor Breed should do the right thing and temporarily step back from her duties until a full, independent investigation can be completed.”
Gee, I wonder what job Gordon sees himself in soon, eh?
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations
Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Man Hilariously Trolls Michael Bloomberg By Asking Him To Say ‘Stop-And-Frisk’ For Selfie
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-15--Man Hilariously Trolls Michael Bloomberg By Asking Him To Say ‘Stop-And-Frisk’ For Selfie

Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg , the former mayor of New York City , found himself being hilariously trolled this week when a man asked him to say “ stop and frisk ” as he snapped a selfie with him .
In a video captured by the conservative group America Rising , a man walks up to Bloomberg and asks for a selfie as the candidate campaigns in North Carolina .
As Bloomberg starts to pose with him , the man says , “ Hey , Mike , say stop-and-frisk , ” using the typical tone of voice someone would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bloomberg doesn ’ t appear to realize what he ’ s being asked to say at first , and he does indeed seem to say “ stop and frisk ” before he processes the request .
As Bloomberg then hurries away , someone off camera can be heard exclaiming , “ racist piece of s*t. ” This comes days after a recording surfaced of a 2015 speech Bloomberg gave at the Aspen Institute in which he defended “ stop and frisk , ” his controversial strategy of tackling crime in minority neighborhoods .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ 95 percent of your murders , and murderers , and murder victims fit one [ description ] , ” he can be heard saying .
“ You can just take the description , Xerox it , and pass it out to all of the cops .
They are male , minorities , 15 to 25 .
That ’ s true in New York , it ’ s true in virtually every city in America.
” While campaigning in North Carolina , Bloomberg dodged questions about the recording and refused to discuss it in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which added that numerous people had told the network that they had hoped he would address it .
Given the obsession with race that the modern left has , it ’ s hard to imagine that Bloomberg will be able to come back from this tape .
It could not be more hilarious that a troll was able to get Bloomberg to say the very phrase that may just destroy his campaign forever .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : Challenger DeAnna @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote

By PoliZette Staff | February 15, 2020
Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York City, found himself being hilariously trolled this week when a man asked him to say “stop and frisk” as he snapped a selfie with him.
In a video captured by the conservative group America Rising, a man walks up to Bloomberg and asks for a selfie as the candidate campaigns in North Carolina. As Bloomberg starts to pose with him, the man says, “Hey, Mike, say stop-and-frisk,” using the typical tone of voice someone would use when saying “say cheese.”
Bloomberg doesn’t appear to realize what he’s being asked to say at first, and he does indeed seem to say “stop and frisk” before he processes the request. As Bloomberg then hurries away, someone off camera can be heard exclaiming, “racist piece of s*t.”
This comes days after a recording surfaced of a 2015 speech Bloomberg gave at the Aspen Institute in which he defended “stop and frisk,” his controversial strategy of tackling crime in minority neighborhoods.
“It’s controversial, but… 95 percent of your murders, and murderers, and murder victims fit one [description],” he can be heard saying. “You can just take the description, Xerox it, and pass it out to all of the cops. They are male, minorities, 15 to 25. That’s true in New York, it’s true in virtually every city in America.”
While campaigning in North Carolina, Bloomberg dodged questions about the recording and refused to discuss it in any way, according to CNN, which added that numerous people had told the network that they had hoped he would address it.
Given the obsession with race that the modern left has, it’s hard to imagine that Bloomberg will be able to come back from this tape. It could not be more hilarious that a troll was able to get Bloomberg to say the very phrase that may just destroy his campaign forever.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations
Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com US Navy Seizes Iranian Weapons Bound for Yemen, No Obama Surrender to Iran This Time
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-02-15--US Navy Seizes Iranian Weapons Bound for Yemen, No Obama Surrender to Iran This Time

The US Navy seems to have undergone a bit of an attitude adjustment in the last four years .
The naval force under Obama in January of 2016 suffered through the humiliation of having several American sailors taken prisoner by the Iranians in the Persian Gulf .
After permitting the Iranians to board their vessel without a shot fired , the U.S. personnel were forced on their knees , hands behind their heads .
The pictures of such were spread around the world .
It was a snapshot reminiscent of the Iranian hostage drama of 1979-81 .
Our fleet now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Iranians were reminded of that fact on Sunday , as the USS Normandy searched one of their innocent looking smuggling vessels , a dhow , and viola , made a nice catch of the day .
MORE NEWS : Disturbing new report reveals FBI had multiple informants in Trump ’ s presidential campaign They seized numerous items including 150 anti-tank guided missiles , SAMs , scopes , munitions , weapons parts , and other tools of war .
The cache was on its way to the Houthi rebels in Yemen .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the Saudis in Yemen and the Houthis are Iranian allies .
This is the second time recently the US Navy caught the Iranians in a smuggling operation to the Houthis .
In November the USS Forest Sherman made a similar haul , also in the Arabian Sea .
You almost have to feel sorry for leadership in Tehran .
For eight happy years they had a steadfast ally in the White House .
That de facto Baath Party member sent them cash , cut them a sweetheart nuke deal , and even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attack their nuclear program .
The Iranians responded to all of the Obama cuddling by sending Qassem Soleimani to kill our forces in Iraq and by seizing our sailors and parading the pics in front of all and sundry .
MORE NEWS : Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote But strangely now , when US forces board their boats , it ’ s the Iranians who do the surrendering .
We have here another instructive lesson in the tale of two presidents .
One who cowered in front of our enemies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one who asserts U.S. interests .
It ’ s a story Tehran is learning to their great distaste .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : CNN ’ s Brian Stelter tries to attack Fox News for ignoring major Trump story – it immediately backfires Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations

By David Kamioner | February 15, 2020
The US Navy seems to have undergone a bit of an attitude adjustment in the last four years.
The naval force under Obama in January of 2016 suffered through the humiliation of having several American sailors taken prisoner by the Iranians in the Persian Gulf. After permitting the Iranians to board their vessel without a shot fired, the U.S. personnel were forced on their knees, hands behind their heads. The pictures of such were spread around the world. It was a snapshot reminiscent of the Iranian hostage drama of 1979-81.
Our fleet now has a different Commander-in-Chief and it shows. The Iranians were reminded of that fact on Sunday, as the USS Normandy searched one of their innocent looking smuggling vessels, a dhow, and viola, made a nice catch of the day.
MORE NEWS: Disturbing new report reveals FBI had multiple informants in Trump’s presidential campaign
They seized numerous items including 150 anti-tank guided missiles, SAMs, scopes, munitions, weapons parts, and other tools of war. The cache was on its way to the Houthi rebels in Yemen. The Iranians are in a proxy war with the Saudis in Yemen and the Houthis are Iranian allies.
This is the second time recently the US Navy caught the Iranians in a smuggling operation to the Houthis. In November the USS Forest Sherman made a similar haul, also in the Arabian Sea.
You almost have to feel sorry for leadership in Tehran. For eight happy years they had a steadfast ally in the White House. That de facto Baath Party member sent them cash, cut them a sweetheart nuke deal, and even told the mullahs of Israeli plans to attack their nuclear program.
The Iranians responded to all of the Obama cuddling by sending Qassem Soleimani to kill our forces in Iraq and by seizing our sailors and parading the pics in front of all and sundry.
MORE NEWS: Manchin comes crawling back after Trump guilty vote
But strangely now, when US forces board their boats, it’s the Iranians who do the surrendering.
We have here another instructive lesson in the tale of two presidents. One who cowered in front of our enemies (and his covert pals) and one who asserts U.S. interests. It’s a story Tehran is learning to their great distaste.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
CNN’s Brian Stelter tries to attack Fox News for ignoring major Trump story – it immediately backfires
Challenger DeAnna Lorraine charging hard against Nancy Pelosi
Three House Dems on Judiciary Committee hit with ethics allegations
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Barbra Streisand Bizarrely Claims Trump Is ‘Directly Responsible’ For Growing Hate Against Children
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.