thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-23--Trump First President in History to Speak at March for Life

On Friday President Donald Trump will be the first president to address the March for Life rally in DC in the 47 years the event has taken place .
The rally brings together Americans from all over the nation who oppose abortion .
About 100,000 attend and last year Vice-President Mike Pence made an unscheduled appearance , much to the delight of the audience .
This announcement came on the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion .
RELATED : Why 2020 Will Be a Vital Year for the Supreme Court Jeanne Mancini , president of the group @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to say : “ From the appointment of pro-life judges and federal workers , to cutting taxpayer funding for abortions here and abroad , to calling for an end to late-term abortions , President Trump and his administration have been consistent champions for life and their support for the March for Life has been unwavering .
We are grateful for all these pro-life accomplishments and look forward to gaining more victories for life in the future.
” The president ’ s canny media move will rain on the PR parade of House Dems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against him in the Senate impeachment trial .
In a further goading of the Left , his participation will draw out the vicious criticism of the abortion on demand and partial-birth abortion crowd .
The abortion hardliners will want their share of air time as well , thus also contributing to a lack of attention for the House Dem impeachment managers .
While it must be granted that many have sadly come to view abortion as a legal right , many also draw the line at partial-birth abortion and agree with numerous state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The president will no doubt also be talking to those relatively moderate voters in his address to the rally .
RELATED : Trump Heads into New Year of 2020 with ‘ Historic ’ Number of Judicial Appointments Pro-life and social conservative groups were first leery of Trump when he joined the 2016 race for the presidency .
He had been a registered Democrat , an outspoken supporter of and donor to Dem campaigns , and was not viewed as reliable on social issues .
His personal life also left some traditionalists aghast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proven his pro-life bona fides and social conservatives largely and enthusiastically have come to support him for reelection .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47 Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial

By David Kamioner | January 22, 2020
On Friday President Donald Trump will be the first president to address the March for Life rally in DC in the 47 years the event has taken place.
The rally brings together Americans from all over the nation who oppose abortion. About 100,000 attend and last year Vice-President Mike Pence made an unscheduled appearance, much to the delight of the audience. This announcement came on the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion.
RELATED: Why 2020 Will Be a Vital Year for the Supreme Court
Jeanne Mancini, president of the group that organizes the march, had this to say:
“From the appointment of pro-life judges and federal workers, to cutting taxpayer funding for abortions here and abroad, to calling for an end to late-term abortions, President Trump and his administration have been consistent champions for life and their support for the March for Life has been unwavering. We are grateful for all these pro-life accomplishments and look forward to gaining more victories for life in the future.”
The president’s canny media move will rain on the PR parade of House Dems who will be wrapping up their arguments against him in the Senate impeachment trial.
In a further goading of the Left, his participation will draw out the vicious criticism of the abortion on demand and partial-birth abortion crowd.
The abortion hardliners will want their share of air time as well, thus also contributing to a lack of attention for the House Dem impeachment managers.
While it must be granted that many have sadly come to view abortion as a legal right, many also draw the line at partial-birth abortion and agree with numerous state laws restricting access to the fatal procedure. The president will no doubt also be talking to those relatively moderate voters in his address to the rally.
RELATED: Trump Heads into New Year of 2020 with ‘Historic’ Number of Judicial Appointments
Pro-life and social conservative groups were first leery of Trump when he joined the 2016 race for the presidency. He had been a registered Democrat, an outspoken supporter of and donor to Dem campaigns, and was not viewed as reliable on social issues.
His personal life also left some traditionalists aghast.
But his actions as president have proven his pro-life bona fides and social conservatives largely and enthusiastically have come to support him for reelection.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47
Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning
Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Judge Demands Hunter Biden Appear In Court After Failing To Hand Over Financial Documents
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-22--States Speak Up Asking Senate to Throw Out Impeachment

Fox News reports on Wednesday that 21 GOP Attorneys General have requested that the U.S. Senate bounce both articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump , saying that the impeachment and trial , “ establishes a dangerous historical precedent.
” “ If not expressly repudiated by the Senate , the theories animating both Articles will set a precedent that is entirely contrary to the Framers ’ design and ruinous to the most important governmental structure protections contained in our Constitution : the separation of powers , ” the AGs said .
They continued .
“ Even an unsuccessful effort to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 2020 presidential election because it weaponizes a process that should only be initiated in exceedingly rare circumstances and should never be used for partisan purposes.
” In conclusion , they noted , “ It can not be a legitimate basis to impeach a President for acting in a legal manner that may also be politically advantageous .
Such a standard would be cause for the impeachment of virtually every President , past , present , and future.
” The letter was signed by the GOP Attorneys General of Alabama , Alaska , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Kansas , Kentucky , Louisiana , Mississippi , Missouri , Montana , Nebraska , Ohio , Oklahoma , South Carolina , South Dakota , Tennessee , Texas , Utah , and West Virginia .
The states have hit upon a point also stated by the president ’ s lawyers in the trial and by Senator Marsha Blackburn ( R-TN ) last week .
At least three of the “ jurors ” in the Senate , Warren , Sanders , and Klobuchar , would directly benefit from a partisan guilty verdict .
How @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conflict of interest sit on the jury ?
In fact , the entire 47 member Senate Dem caucus would benefit .
How indeed can they sit in judgment of the man they have already said they desperately want removed from office before he is reelected ?
The GOP is in the same boat , you say .
They directly benefit from the president ’ s acquittal .
But the GOP didn ’ t bring these charges , they did not initiate this fiasco and weaponize a process that should be reserved for solemn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to pack the Supreme Court to ram through more socialism ?
Sure , impeach and convict him .
Jimmy Carter , well , just on general principle ?
He ’ s history .
But this president has done nothing wrong and these states know it .
As does , the American people .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47 Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial

By David Kamioner | January 22, 2020
Fox News reports on Wednesday that 21 GOP Attorneys General have requested that the U.S. Senate bounce both articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, saying that the impeachment and trial, “establishes a dangerous historical precedent.”
They pulled no punches.
“If not expressly repudiated by the Senate, the theories animating both Articles will set a precedent that is entirely contrary to the Framers’ design and ruinous to the most important governmental structure protections contained in our Constitution: the separation of powers,” the AGs said. They continued.
RELATED: Tulsi Gabbard Announces $50M Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton
“Even an unsuccessful effort to impeach the President undermines the integrity of the 2020 presidential election because it weaponizes a process that should only be initiated in exceedingly rare circumstances and should never be used for partisan purposes.”
In conclusion, they noted, “It cannot be a legitimate basis to impeach a President for acting in a legal manner that may also be politically advantageous.
Such a standard would be cause for the impeachment of virtually every President, past, present, and future.”
The letter was signed by the GOP Attorneys General of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia.
The states have hit upon a point also stated by the president’s lawyers in the trial and by Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) last week. At least three of the “jurors” in the Senate, Warren, Sanders, and Klobuchar, would directly benefit from a partisan guilty verdict.
RELATED: Chief Justice Roberts Forced to Play Referee During Impeachment Trials
How can a person with that kind of conflict of interest sit on the jury? In fact, the entire 47 member Senate Dem caucus would benefit.
How indeed can they sit in judgment of the man they have already said they desperately want removed from office before he is reelected?
The GOP is in the same boat, you say. They directly benefit from the president’s acquittal. But the GOP didn’t bring these charges, they did not initiate this fiasco and weaponize a process that should be reserved for solemn and dangerous constitutional questions.
Like these:
FDR trying to pack the Supreme Court to ram through more socialism? Sure, impeach and convict him.
John Kennedy’s 1960 election stealing and intimate mob ties? Boot him.
Jimmy Carter, well, just on general principle? He’s history.
But this president has done nothing wrong and these states know it. As does, the American people.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47
Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning
Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Limbaugh: Trump Gives One Of Best Speeches Of His Presidency As Impeachment Trial Begins
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-22--Trump Trial Winners and Losers: We’ll Help You Decide

In a couple of hours , we ’ re again diving into what may become another late-night session in the Senate trial of President Donald Trump .
But before that news eclipses last night ’ s events , let ’ s look at an overview of Monday ’ s hijinks and see how they played out legally and politically .
Presidential lawyers Pat Cipollone and Jay Sekulow knocked it out of the park yesterday in their defense of the president .
Cipollone especially shined as he had just the right mix of scholarly demeanor and lawyerly aggression .
He knocked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gnats and his consistent success at the podium drove Dems to fits of agitation .
That agita made Jerry Nadler lose it at the end , as we covered in a previous piece .
RELATED : President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47 Adam Schiff fared no better , as his personal mannerisms got truly odd as the trial wore on .
He seemed not to know what to do with his hands at the rostrum , first holding them together , then kneading them against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ look like Lady MacBeth in a bad suit .
The Dems used a PowerPoint demonstration that would have embarrassed a third grader as they trudged from point to redundant point not ever moving enough Republicans by their exertions to win the vote on a single amendment .
In fact , during the entire night , they got one Republican one time , Susan Collins of Maine , to break ranks .
It didn ’ t matter and the GOP won that vote too .
RELATED : Hillary Clinton Slams Bernie : ‘ Nobody @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Misogynists It seems the Dems are not playing to the Senate , as they almost admitted a couple of times .
They are playing to the media , to give them their talking points , and to the fall election .
The agitprop bullets you see on the screen at the trial you will see again in Dem messaging in the fall election .
Speaking of that benighted political group , three of their coterie , Senators Warren , Sanders , and Klobuchar , must be seething in their seats as the trial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ longer nights , and has the potential to go weeks .
That will keep the trio off the campaign trail in Iowa and New Hampshire and is a serious boon to Joe Biden and the rest of the Dem field .
Whether Chuck Schumer has intentionally designed it that way is an interesting idea to contemplate .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47 Tim Tebow Officially Tied the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial

By David Kamioner | January 22, 2020
In a couple of hours, we’re again diving into what may become another late-night session in the Senate trial of President Donald Trump.
But before that news eclipses last night’s events, let’s look at an overview of Monday’s hijinks and see how they played out legally and politically.
Presidential lawyers Pat Cipollone and Jay Sekulow knocked it out of the park yesterday in their defense of the president. Cipollone especially shined as he had just the right mix of scholarly demeanor and lawyerly aggression.
He knocked down Dem arguments like swatting away slow-learning gnats and his consistent success at the podium drove Dems to fits of agitation. That agita made Jerry Nadler lose it at the end, as we covered in a previous piece.
RELATED: President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47
Adam Schiff fared no better, as his personal mannerisms got truly odd as the trial wore on.
He seemed not to know what to do with his hands at the rostrum, first holding them together, then kneading them against one another in scenes that made him look like Lady MacBeth in a bad suit.
The Dems used a PowerPoint demonstration that would have embarrassed a third grader as they trudged from point to redundant point not ever moving enough Republicans by their exertions to win the vote on a single amendment.
In fact, during the entire night, they got one Republican one time, Susan Collins of Maine, to break ranks. It didn’t matter and the GOP won that vote too.
RELATED: Hillary Clinton Slams Bernie: ‘Nobody Likes Him’ and His Supporters are Misogynists
It seems the Dems are not playing to the Senate, as they almost admitted a couple of times. They are playing to the media, to give them their talking points, and to the fall election. The agitprop bullets you see on the screen at the trial you will see again in Dem messaging in the fall election.
Speaking of that benighted political group, three of their coterie, Senators Warren, Sanders, and Klobuchar, must be seething in their seats as the trial promises to bleed into long days, longer nights, and has the potential to go weeks.
That will keep the trio off the campaign trail in Iowa and New Hampshire and is a serious boon to Joe Biden and the rest of the Dem field.
Whether Chuck Schumer has intentionally designed it that way is an interesting idea to contemplate.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47
Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning
Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Trump Torches Clinton Over Her Anti-Bernie Sanders Remark
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-22--Tulsi Gabbard Announces $50M Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton

Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard is suing Hillary Clinton on charges of defamation .
Last October Clinton referred to Gabbard as a “ Russian asset ” during an interview .
“ Clinton lied about her perceived rival Tulsi Gabbard…She did so publicly , unambiguously , and with obvious malicious intent .
Tulsi has been harmed by Clinton ’ s lies — and American democracy has suffered as well.
” The two have sparred publically over social media during Gabbard ’ s campaign .
The day after Clinton ’ s interview remarks , Gabbard fired back on Facebook : “ Great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You , the queen of warmongers , embodiment of corruption , and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long , have finally come out from behind the curtain .
From the day I announced my candidacy , there has been a concerted campaign to destroy my reputation .
We wondered who was behind it and why .
Now we know — it was always you , through your proxies and powerful allies in the corporate media and war machine , afraid of the threat I pose .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ primary is between you and me .
Don ’ t cowardly hide behind your proxies .
Join the race directly.
” Gabbard has been described as a moderate Democrat , which for some had made her less favorable , while more favorable with others .
Hillary didn ’ t get elected in 2016 , but that hasn ’ t stopped her from intervening in the 2020 election .
On top of her remarks about Gabbard , she has also attacked her 2016 colleague , Bernie Sanders , calling his supporters “ misogynistic.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47 Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial

By John Wesley Reid | January 22, 2020
Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard is suing Hillary Clinton on charges of defamation. Last October Clinton referred to Gabbard as a “Russian asset” during an interview.
Aan excerpt from the lawsuit reads:
“Clinton lied about her perceived rival Tulsi Gabbard…She did so publicly, unambiguously, and with obvious malicious intent. Tulsi has been harmed by Clinton’s lies — and American democracy has suffered as well.”
RELATED: Tulsi Gabbard Calls Hillary Clinton “Warmonger” on Tucker Carlson
The two have sparred publically over social media during Gabbard’s campaign. The day after Clinton’s interview remarks, Gabbard fired back on Facebook:
“Great! Thank you, Hillary Clinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain.
From the day I announced my candidacy, there has been a concerted campaign to destroy my reputation. We wondered who was behind it and why. Now we know — it was always you, through your proxies and powerful allies in the corporate media and war machine, afraid of the threat I pose.
It’s now clear that this primary is between you and me. Don’t cowardly hide behind your proxies. Join the race directly.”
Great! Thank you, Hillary Clinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the… Posted by Tulsi Gabbard on Friday, October 18, 2019
RELATED: Trump Praises Democrat Tulsi Gabbard for Voting ‘Present’ on Impeachment
Gabbard has been described as a moderate Democrat, which for some had made her less favorable, while more favorable with others.
Hillary didn’t get elected in 2016, but that hasn’t stopped her from intervening in the 2020 election. On top of her remarks about Gabbard, she has also attacked her 2016 colleague, Bernie Sanders, calling his supporters “misogynistic.”
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47
Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning
Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Chief Justice Roberts Forced to Play Referee During Impeachment Trials
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-22--Chief Justice Roberts Forced to Play Referee During Impeachment Trials

Tuesday ’ s first day of the Senate trial of President Donald Trump was a relatively boring affair , up until almost the end .
The GOP shield wall held up on vote after vote , losing only one member , Collins of Maine , one time on a small procedural matter .
At the end of the night , the score was Trump 11 , the Dems 0 .
Fans of the president cheered and chortled on social media as 11 out of 11 , save the one noted above , pathetic Schumer amendments were shot down in flames @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47 After a night of that kind of battering the Dems started to lose their equilibrium .
You could see it in Schiff .
He began to oddly glare at the GOP lawyers as if he could conjure up a death stare that would make them cease and desist legally beating him like a rug .
They didn ’ t seem to even notice him .
At almost the end , not long before 1am , the Dems could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they were convincing no Republican in the Senate to break party ranks enough to give them even one victory overwhelmed the already delicate sensibilities of Dem House Manager Jerry Nadler .
He let loose .
He called GOP legal actions “ treacherous.
” Nadler claimed the Senate was engaged in a “ cover-up ” and that “ only guilty people try to hide evidence.
” He went on to say that “ the Senate is on trial ” and asked if they would “ betray your pledge to be an impartial juror.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ First Disastrous Day of Impeachment Trial and It ’ s Beyond Hilarious “ We ’ ve made our arguments to you .
And you don ’ t deserve , and we don ’ t deserve , what just happened .
Mr. Nadler came up here and made false allegations against our team .
He made false allegations against all of you ; he accused you of a cover-up .
He ’ s been making false allegations against the president .
The only one who should be embarrassed , Mr. Nadler is you , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States Senate .
This is the United States Senate .
You ’ re not in charge here .
… It ’ s about time we bring this power trip in for a landing , ” said Cipollone .
It got so heated that Chief Justice John Roberts , presiding over the trial , had to warn both sides on their language .
He scolded , “ Those addressing the Senate should remember where they are.
” The night ended soon after with complete GOP victory and Dem loss .
Day two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47 Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial

By David Kamioner | January 22, 2020
Tuesday’s first day of the Senate trial of President Donald Trump was a relatively boring affair, up until almost the end.
The GOP shield wall held up on vote after vote, losing only one member, Collins of Maine, one time on a small procedural matter. At the end of the night, the score was Trump 11, the Dems 0.
Fans of the president cheered and chortled on social media as 11 out of 11, save the one noted above, pathetic Schumer amendments were shot down in flames on 53-47 party line votes.
RELATED: President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47
After a night of that kind of battering the Dems started to lose their equilibrium. You could see it in Schiff. He began to oddly glare at the GOP lawyers as if he could conjure up a death stare that would make them cease and desist legally beating him like a rug.
They didn’t seem to even notice him.
At almost the end, not long before 1am, the Dems could stand it no longer.
The frustration that they were convincing no Republican in the Senate to break party ranks enough to give them even one victory overwhelmed the already delicate sensibilities of Dem House Manager Jerry Nadler. He let loose.
He called GOP legal actions “treacherous.” Nadler claimed the Senate was engaged in a “cover-up” and that “only guilty people try to hide evidence.” He went on to say that “the Senate is on trial” and asked if they would “betray your pledge to be an impartial juror.”
RELATED: Twitter Reacts to Dems First Disastrous Day of Impeachment Trial and It’s Beyond Hilarious
The president’s personal lawyer struck back hard.
“We’ve made our arguments to you. And you don’t deserve, and we don’t deserve, what just happened. Mr. Nadler came up here and made false allegations against our team. He made false allegations against all of you; he accused you of a cover-up. He’s been making false allegations against the president. The only one who should be embarrassed, Mr. Nadler is you, for the way you’ve addressed the United States Senate. This is the United States Senate. You’re not in charge here. … It’s about time we bring this power trip in for a landing,” said Cipollone.
It got so heated that Chief Justice John Roberts, presiding over the trial, had to warn both sides on their language. He scolded, “Those addressing the Senate should remember where they are.”
The night ended soon after with complete GOP victory and Dem loss. Day two starts in mere hours.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47
Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning
Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Tulsi Gabbard Slams Hillary Over Bernie Comments: You Need to Grow Up
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-23--Elizabeth Warren Vows To Fill Her Cabinet With Women And ‘NON-BINARY’ People

Elizabeth Warren announced that a potential Warren cabinet would be comprised of at least 50 % women and “ non-binary ” individuals .
In a post on Medium entitled , “ Restoring Integrity and Competence to Government After Trump , ” Warren set out her priorities if she was elected as President in November .
“ My agenda would make our government and our economy work for everyone , ” she wrote .
Warren first attacked President Trump for having unfilled positions in the cabinet and government that required Senate confirmation .
She ignored the fact that Democratic senators have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as Justice Kavanaugh .
One of her first acts would be to “ establish a Justice Department Task Force to investigate corruption during the Trump administration and to hold government officials accountable for illegal activity , ” claiming the President is running “ the most corrupt administration in history.
” But did not supply any evidence to support her outrageous claims .
A future Warren cabinet and senior leadership team would be built to “ reflect the full diversity of America , including having at least 50 % of Cabinet positions filled by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the federal government currently “ does a dismal job on diversity and inclusion.
” For those of you who are not caught up on the woke lingo , non-binary individuals do not identify as being either a man or a woman , but somewhere in between on the so-called “ gender spectrum.
” This would not necessarily be an empty promise , as Warren currently employs 31 women and 20 men in her Senate offices .
And women outnumber men in the vast majority of her campaign team as well .
Warren would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minister Justin Trudeau who first tried to create a “ diverse ” cabinet when he was elected in 2015 .
Warren would also “ ensure representation of LGBTQ+ people across all levels of government , including in leadership roles.
” And , she would create “ new paid fellowship programs for federal jobs for people from marginalized communities and low-income applicants , including formerly incarcerated individuals.
” And , she would “ open up promotion pathways by requiring every federal agency to incorporate diversity as part of their core strategic plan and creating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that centers Black and Brown employees.
” Fauxcahontas is at it again it seems !
Not content with pushing the boundaries on who can identify as a Native American , she ’ s also decided to be the first person to demand non-binary people are represented in government !
It makes me wonder though how committed to diversity she really is .
She says the cabinet needs to “ reflect the full diversity of America , ” which is understandable .
But , for some reason I don ’ t think she ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of all – diversity of thought !
When are you going to ensure half of your cabinet are conservatives Senator Warren ?
If you want to be reflective of the country at large , that ’ s only fair .
Unless , of course , you only care what someone looks like , or what ’ s between their legs , instead of what ’ s in their brains .
For some reason , I doubt you worry too much about the latter .

Elizabeth Warren announced that a potential Warren cabinet would be comprised of at least 50% women and “non-binary” individuals.
Warren Attacks President Trump
In a post on Medium entitled, “Restoring Integrity and Competence to Government After Trump,” Warren set out her priorities if she was elected as President in November. “My agenda would make our government and our economy work for everyone,” she wrote.
Warren first attacked President Trump for having unfilled positions in the cabinet and government that required Senate confirmation. She ignored the fact that Democratic senators have attacked many of his appointees, such as Justice Kavanaugh. One of her first acts would be to “establish a Justice Department Task Force to investigate corruption during the Trump administration and to hold government officials accountable for illegal activity,” claiming the President is running “the most corrupt administration in history.” But did not supply any evidence to support her outrageous claims.
RELATED: Elizabeth Warren Vows to Create DOJ Task Force to Investigate Trump
A Very “Diverse” Cabinet
A future Warren cabinet and senior leadership team would be built to “reflect the full diversity of America, including having at least 50% of Cabinet positions filled by women and non-binary people,” as the federal government currently “does a dismal job on diversity and inclusion.”
For those of you who are not caught up on the woke lingo, non-binary individuals do not identify as being either a man or a woman, but somewhere in between on the so-called “gender spectrum.”
This would not necessarily be an empty promise, as Warren currently employs 31 women and 20 men in her Senate offices. And women outnumber men in the vast majority of her campaign team as well. Warren would be following the example of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau who first tried to create a “diverse” cabinet when he was elected in 2015.
Warren would also “ensure representation of LGBTQ+ people across all levels of government, including in leadership roles.” And, she would create “new paid fellowship programs for federal jobs for people from marginalized communities and low-income applicants, including formerly incarcerated individuals.” And, she would “open up promotion pathways by requiring every federal agency to incorporate diversity as part of their core strategic plan and creating support networks through a government-wide mentorship program that centers Black and Brown employees.”
RELATED: Elizabeth Warren’s Son-in-Law Made Movie Funded By Iran’s Government
Classic Fauxcahontas!
Fauxcahontas is at it again it seems! Not content with pushing the boundaries on who can identify as a Native American, she’s also decided to be the first person to demand non-binary people are represented in government!
It makes me wonder though how committed to diversity she really is. She says the cabinet needs to “reflect the full diversity of America,” which is understandable. But, for some reason I don’t think she’s talking about the most important diversity of all – diversity of thought!
When are you going to ensure half of your cabinet are conservatives Senator Warren? If you want to be reflective of the country at large, that’s only fair. Unless, of course, you only care what someone looks like, or what’s between their legs, instead of what’s in their brains. For some reason, I doubt you worry too much about the latter.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-23--Elizabeth Warren Confronted About Refund For College Education

A self-described father of a college graduate was caught on video asking Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren about her “ plan to cancel student loan debt.
” He wanted to know if he will be able to get his money back after “ working a double shift ” to pay for his daughter ’ s college education .
Needless to say , Warren ’ s answer did not appear to satisfy the man .
In a video featured at Twitchy , Warren is approached by the father who asks her about the senator ’ s student loan cancellation plan .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Her Male Colleagues “ My daughter ’ s getting out of school , I saved all my money , so she doesn ’ t have any student debt , ” the man says .
“ Am I going to get my money back ?
” “ So , we end up paying for people who didn ’ t save any money , then those who did the right thing get screwed , ” the father says .
Then he talks about his “ buddy ” who he says makes more money than him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Meanwhile he has worked a “ double shift ” and saved his hard-earned dollars to make sure his daughter wasn ’ t in debt .
“ So , you ’ re laughing , ” the man says , replying to Warren ’ s reaction .
“ Yes , that ’ s exactly what you ’ re doing , ” he says after Warren appears to reject the idea that she ’ s laughing .
“ We did the right thing — and we get screwed , ” the frustrated man says who then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign site features a “ plan to cancel student loan debt on day one of my presidency ” which includes giving debt relief to “ 42 million Americans.
” “ I will start to use existing laws on day one of my presidency to implement my student loan debt cancellation plan that offers relief to 42 million Americans — in addition to using all available tools to address racial disparities in higher education , crack down on for-profit institutions , and eliminate predatory lending ” the Warren campaign website declares .
“ Here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” it continues .
“ I ’ ll direct the Secretary of Education to use their authority to begin to compromise and modify federal student loans consistent with my plan to cancel up to $ 50,000 in debt for 95 % of student loan borrowers ( about 42 million people ) .
” RELATED : ‘ Debts Must Be Repaid , ’ Elizabeth Warren Said Before Proposing Elimination Of Student Debt , Free College The Father Was Right Warren also claims , “ I ’ ll also direct the Secretary of Education to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the for-profit college industry , crack down on predatory student lending , and combat the racial disparities in our higher education system.
” There is more to her plan which you can read in its entirety .
But the one thing you won ’ t find is where this hardworking father and others like him who have paid for their children ’ s education can get a refund .
No , chances are their taxes would go up under a President Warren to pay for others ’ schooling .
The father was @ @ @ @ @

RELATED: Warren Goes Full Sexist On Her Male Colleagues
These socialists claim to be on the side of the people and fairness. It's obvious they are not. Just pandering and attempted to buy votes. https://t.co/LHe3qZJGD9 — Eric Davis (@esdavis74) January 23, 2020
He Asks A Legitimate Question
“My daughter’s getting out of school, I saved all my money, so she doesn’t have any student debt,” the man says. “Am I going to get my money back?”
“Of course not,” Warren replied.
“So, we end up paying for people who didn’t save any money, then those who did the right thing get screwed,” the father says.
Then he talks about his “buddy” who he says makes more money than him but is irresponsible with his earnings. Meanwhile he has worked a “double shift” and saved his hard-earned dollars to make sure his daughter wasn’t in debt.
Warren Laughing?
“So, you’re laughing,” the man says, replying to Warren’s reaction. “Yes, that’s exactly what you’re doing,” he says after Warren appears to reject the idea that she’s laughing.
“We did the right thing — and we get screwed,” the frustrated man says who then just walked away.
A Father confronts @SenWarren Father : My daughter is in school, I saved all my money just to pay student loans Can I have my money back? Warren: of course not Father: so you want to help those who don't save any money and the ones that do the right thing get screwed? pic.twitter.com/EY8M57tj9F — JiveBunny (@JiveBunnyMuzik) January 21, 2020
Warren’s campaign site features a “plan to cancel student loan debt on day one of my presidency” which includes giving debt relief to “42 million Americans.”
“I will start to use existing laws on day one of my presidency to implement my student loan debt cancellation plan that offers relief to 42 million Americans — in addition to using all available tools to address racial disparities in higher education, crack down on for-profit institutions, and eliminate predatory lending” the Warren campaign website declares.
“Here’s how it will work,” it continues. “I’ll direct the Secretary of Education to use their authority to begin to compromise and modify federal student loans consistent with my plan to cancel up to $50,000 in debt for 95% of student loan borrowers (about 42 million people).”
RELATED: ‘Debts Must Be Repaid,’ Elizabeth Warren Said Before Proposing Elimination Of Student Debt, Free College
Warren confronted in Iowa! 💥https://t.co/gQi8V1mibF — Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) January 23, 2020
The Father Was Right
Warren also claims, “I’ll also direct the Secretary of Education to use every existing authority available to rein in the for-profit college industry, crack down on predatory student lending, and combat the racial disparities in our higher education system.”
There is more to her plan which you can read in its entirety.
But the one thing you won’t find is where this hardworking father and others like him who have paid for their children’s education can get a refund.
No, chances are their taxes would go up under a President Warren to pay for others’ schooling.
The father was right to be angry.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-23--Virginia Senate Passes Bill Allowing Transgender Individuals To Change Sex On Birth Certificate

The Virginia State Senate has passed a bill that would allow transgender individuals to alter their birth certificate to match the sex they “ truly are.
” Virginia Senate Bill 657 allows transgender individuals to obtain a new birth certificate , showing a change in sex .
And , if necessary , a change in name , too , if accompanied by a court order .
There is no need for the individual in question to hand over “ evidence or documentation of any medical procedure , ” like genital surgery .
But , there is a requirement that “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ birth submit an affidavit provided by a health care provider from whom the person has received treatment stating that the person has undergone clinically appropriate treatment for the purpose of gender transition.
” RELATED : Hillary Clinton Says Women Have ‘ Legitimate Concern ’ About Transgender Issue According to the office of state Senator Jennifer Boysko , who has tried to introduce the bill for the past three years , the “ treatment ” required could range from “ counseling , hormone therapy , sex reassignment surgery , or a patient-specific approach ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I just think it ’ s important to try to make life easier for people without being discriminated [ against ] or bullied , ” Boysko said : Allowing an individual who is transgender to change their birth certificate without having to go through the full surgery allows them to live the life that they are due to have .
I believe that we have a more open and accepting General Assembly then we ’ ve had in the past , where people are more comfortable working with the LGBTQ community and have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some of these long overdue changes .
The decision was applauded by Vee Lamneck , the executive director of Equality Virginia , an “ LGTBTQ ” advocacy group .
Lamneck said that they were “ really pleased that this bill is moving through , ” as it is “ really important for the transgender community .
Right now many transgendered people do not have identity documents … this is really problematic when people apply for jobs or try to open a bank account.
” This bill , if successful , would make Virginia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legislation .
To me , this seems rather strange .
A birth certificate is a record of you when you were born , not how you are now .
There are already laws on the books that allow you to change your identification on your passport and drivers licences – is this not enough ?
Do we have to go back and rewrite history ?
Surely this opens problems with doctors – knowing the biological sex of their patient is crucial to treat them properly , and if their records are based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ genuine harm to transgendered individuals .

The Virginia State Senate has passed a bill that would allow transgender individuals to alter their birth certificate to match the sex they “truly are.”
Virginia Is Going Woke
Virginia Senate Bill 657 allows transgender individuals to obtain a new birth certificate, showing a change in sex. And, if necessary, a change in name, too, if accompanied by a court order. There is no need for the individual in question to hand over “evidence or documentation of any medical procedure,” like genital surgery. But, there is a requirement that “the person requesting the new certificate of birth submit an affidavit provided by a health care provider from whom the person has received treatment stating that the person has undergone clinically appropriate treatment for the purpose of gender transition.”
RELATED: Hillary Clinton Says Women Have ‘Legitimate Concern’ About Transgender Issue
According to the office of state Senator Jennifer Boysko, who has tried to introduce the bill for the past three years, the “treatment” required could range from “counseling, hormone therapy, sex reassignment surgery, or a patient-specific approach” provided by a medical professional. “I just think it’s important to try to make life easier for people without being discriminated [against] or bullied,” Boysko said:
Allowing an individual who is transgender to change their birth certificate without having to go through the full surgery allows them to live the life that they are due to have. I believe that we have a more open and accepting General Assembly then we’ve had in the past, where people are more comfortable working with the LGBTQ community and have expressed more of an interest in addressing some of these long overdue changes.
The decision was applauded by Vee Lamneck, the executive director of Equality Virginia, an “LGTBTQ” advocacy group. Lamneck said that they were “really pleased that this bill is moving through,” as it is “really important for the transgender community. Right now many transgendered people do not have identity documents … this is really problematic when people apply for jobs or try to open a bank account.”
RELATED: Don Jr.’s New Book Includes A Warning About Transgender Athletes
Don’t Rewrite History!
This bill, if successful, would make Virginia the 23rd state to introduce such pro-transgender legislation. To me, this seems rather strange.
A birth certificate is a record of you when you were born, not how you are now.
There are already laws on the books that allow you to change your identification on your passport and drivers licences – is this not enough? Do we have to go back and rewrite history? Surely this opens problems with doctors – knowing the biological sex of their patient is crucial to treat them properly, and if their records are based on their birth certificates, this could cause genuine harm to transgendered individuals.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-23--Steven Mnuchin Tells Greta Thunberg to Get An Education, Then Talk Economics

U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin had no interest in discussing the economic ideas of climate activist Greta Thunberg , instead suggesting she get an education instead of pretending to be an authority on the matter .
Mnuchin made his comments at a press briefing at the World Economic Forum in Davos , Switzerland .
Thunberg , in an op-ed published in the Guardian , demanded the world ’ s businesses eliminate the use of fossil fuels “ right now.
” “ We demand that at this year ’ s forum , participants from all companies , banks , institutions and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fuel exploration and extraction , immediately end all fossil fuel subsidies and immediately and completely divest from fossil fuels , ” she wrote .
Reporters wanted Mnuchin ’ s thoughts and the Trump cabinet member wasn ’ t having it .
RELATED : Greta Thunberg Says She Wouldn ’ t Waste Her Time Meeting With Trump When asked how Thunberg ’ s suggestion to eliminate fossil fuels would affect the U.S. economy – Hint : It would collapse – Mnuchin couldn ’ t contain his condescension .
“ Is she the chief economist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m confused , ” he said adding that his comments were meant as “ a joke.
” The Treasury Secretary then suggested Thunberg get herself an education before lecturing the world on things involving the economy .
“ After she goes and studies economics in college , she can come back and explain that to us , ” he advised .
Doesn ’ t he know by now , with the example set by global warming extremist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , that even a degree in economics doesn ’ t necessarily make you a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Tlaib : Kids Know Better on Climate Change Isn ’ t it something that climate extremists look to emotionally troubled children to promote their alarmism ?
Perhaps it ’ s because they share similar emotionally stunted thoughts .
Rep. Rashida Tlaib ( D-MN ) recently claimed her son is her policy adviser , bragging that he thinks the world will end by 2030 .
Ocasio-Cortez ( D-NY ) has fretted about the world ending in 10 years as well .
These sound like comments that would come from children .
That is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leader because her underdeveloped mind creates thoughts and ideas that validate the left ’ s extreme , low-information platforms .
“ It doesn ’ t take a college degree in economics to [ realize ] that our remaining 1,5° carbon budget and ongoing fossil fuel subsidies and investments don ’ t add up , ” a tweet from Thunberg ’ s account reads .
Odd that she ’ s interested in engaging with the Trump administration now .
It was just a few weeks ago that Thunberg claimed she wouldn ’ t bother @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ d be a waste of her time .
“ Honestly , I don ’ t think I would have said anything because obviously he ’ s not listening to scientists and experts , so why would he listen to me ?
” she exclaimed .
“ So I probably wouldn ’ t have said anything , I wouldn ’ t have wasted my time.
” Trump mocked her by suggesting she “ work on her Anger Management problem ” and “ go to a good old fashioned movie with a friend .
@

U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin had no interest in discussing the economic ideas of climate activist Greta Thunberg, instead suggesting she get an education instead of pretending to be an authority on the matter.
Mnuchin made his comments at a press briefing at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
Thunberg, in an op-ed published in the Guardian, demanded the world’s businesses eliminate the use of fossil fuels “right now.”
“We demand that at this year’s forum, participants from all companies, banks, institutions and governments immediately halt all investments in fossil fuel exploration and extraction, immediately end all fossil fuel subsidies and immediately and completely divest from fossil fuels,” she wrote.
Reporters wanted Mnuchin’s thoughts and the Trump cabinet member wasn’t having it.
Treasury Secretary Mnuchin says Greta Thunberg can criticize ‘after she studies economics’ – Yahoo Finance https://t.co/xBhT9Ru1Bi via @GoogleNews — Equal Justice For All – USMC Vet – DAV – Profiler (@AthenaAcropolis) January 23, 2020
RELATED: Greta Thunberg Says She Wouldn’t Waste Her Time Meeting With Trump
‘Who is She?’
When asked how Thunberg’s suggestion to eliminate fossil fuels would affect the U.S. economy – Hint: It would collapse – Mnuchin couldn’t contain his condescension.
“Is she the chief economist? Who is she? I’m confused,” he said adding that his comments were meant as “a joke.”
The Treasury Secretary then suggested Thunberg get herself an education before lecturing the world on things involving the economy.
“After she goes and studies economics in college, she can come back and explain that to us,” he advised.
Doesn’t he know by now, with the example set by global warming extremist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, that even a degree in economics doesn’t necessarily make you a brilliant mind on the matter?
RELATED: Tlaib: Kids Know Better on Climate Change
AOC to the Rescue
Isn’t it something that climate extremists look to emotionally troubled children to promote their alarmism? Perhaps it’s because they share similar emotionally stunted thoughts.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MN) recently claimed her son is her policy adviser, bragging that he thinks the world will end by 2030.
Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has fretted about the world ending in 10 years as well.
These sound like comments that would come from children.
That is why they look to Thunberg as a leader because her underdeveloped mind creates thoughts and ideas that validate the left’s extreme, low-information platforms.
Naturally, AOC leaped to Thunberg’s defense.
If you don’t have an economics degree like Greta, they’ll mock you for not having one. If you DO have one, as I do, they’ll claim it’s illegitimate. Haters gonna hate & deniers will deny. They will deny logic, science, and environmental consensus in order to protect oligarchy. https://t.co/6b0S40MQk2 — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) January 23, 2020
“It doesn’t take a college degree in economics to [realize] that our remaining 1,5° carbon budget and ongoing fossil fuel subsidies and investments don’t add up,” a tweet from Thunberg’s account reads.
Odd that she’s interested in engaging with the Trump administration now.
It was just a few weeks ago that Thunberg claimed she wouldn’t bother to meet with President Trump because it’d be a waste of her time.
“Honestly, I don’t think I would have said anything because obviously he’s not listening to scientists and experts, so why would he listen to me?” she exclaimed. “So I probably wouldn’t have said anything, I wouldn’t have wasted my time.”
Trump mocked her by suggesting she “work on her Anger Management problem” and “go to a good old fashioned movie with a friend.”
“Chill Greta, Chill!” he added.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-23--Joe Biden Loses Cool After Reporter Needles Him About His Feud with Bernie Sanders

On Wednesday , 2020 Democratic frontrunner Joe Biden became miffed at a reporter who asked about his ongoing feud with Bernie Sanders .
While Biden was trying to leave a campaign stop in Mason City , Iowa , CBS reporter Ed O ’ Keefe confronted him with questions about his many criticisms of Sanders in an exchange caught on video .
“ Yesterday , yesterday , you said you accepted Bernie ’ s apology .
Now you ’ re attacking him .
Why are you doing that ?
Why wasn ’ t his apology enough , Mr. Vice President ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Keefe asked as he followed the former vice president .
That ’ s when Biden stopped and spun around to answer O ’ Keefe .
And you could tell he was irritated .
RELATED : Michael Moore Blasts Warren For Choosing To ‘ Stick A Knife ’ In Bernie ’ s Back – Says She ’ s Helping Trump Win In 2020 “ Why , why , why , why , why , why , why !
You ’ re getting nervous , man .
Calm down !
It ’ s OK !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ on O ’ Keefe ’ s chest as he continued to explain .
“ He apologized for saying that I was corrupt , ” Biden said , seeming to calm himself down .
“ He didn ’ t mention anything about whether or not I was telling the truth about Social Security , ” he said .
The tension between Biden and Sanders was something Obama ’ s former right-hand man tried to ease after the two 2020 Dems exchanged several quips over Social Security and other matters .
Biden recognized that Sanders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his supporters wrote that the former veep has a “ corruption ” problem .
“ Sometimes campaign staff gets a little ahead of the candidate , ” Biden said , adding , “ I accept his apology , and I hope we can argue on the facts.
” Yet , Biden still insisted that he has never supported cutting Social Security .
RELATED : Biden on the Hot Seat : How Many More Gaffes Does He Need to Commit Before He ’ s Out ?
Will ‘ Uncle Joe ’ Be Able To @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democratic primary rolls on and Senator Sanders continues to be in that top tier conversation , expect tension between the outspoken socialist and frontrunner Biden to become more tense , not less .
The Democratic nominee is still not decided .
This is still anyone ’ s game .
Joe Biden has everything to lose and Bernie Sanders everything to gain .
In the meantime , we ’ ll see how cool “ Uncle Joe ” can remain .

RELATED: Michael Moore Blasts Warren For Choosing To ‘Stick A Knife’ In Bernie’s Back – Says She’s Helping Trump Win In 2020
“Why, why, why, why, why, why, why! You’re getting nervous, man. Calm down! It’s OK!” Biden blared, laying his palms on O’Keefe’s chest as he continued to explain.
“He apologized for saying that I was corrupt,” Biden said, seeming to calm himself down.
“He didn’t mention anything about whether or not I was telling the truth about Social Security,” he said.
Before moving on, Biden gave O’Keefe a fist bump.
Can Trump Beat Joe Biden in 2020? Yes! No. Your Email By voting, you agree to receive email communication from The Political Insider. Click HERE for more information. Vote By voting, you agree to receive email communication from The Political Insider. Click HERE for more information.
Tension Between Biden and Sanders
The tension between Biden and Sanders was something Obama’s former right-hand man tried to ease after the two 2020 Dems exchanged several quips over Social Security and other matters. Biden recognized that Sanders had apologized to him after one of his supporters wrote that the former veep has a “corruption” problem.
“Sometimes campaign staff gets a little ahead of the candidate,” Biden said, adding, “I accept his apology, and I hope we can argue on the facts.”
Yet, Biden still insisted that he has never supported cutting Social Security.
‘What in the hot mess was that?’ Joe Biden got ‘very close to fully freaking out on’ CBS News’ Ed O’Keefe over question about Bernie Sanders https://t.co/LJvwWI9NGe — Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) January 23, 2020
RELATED: Biden on the Hot Seat: How Many More Gaffes Does He Need to Commit Before He’s Out?
Will ‘Uncle Joe’ Be Able To Keep His Cool?
As the 2020 Democratic primary rolls on and Senator Sanders continues to be in that top tier conversation, expect tension between the outspoken socialist and frontrunner Biden to become more tense, not less.
The Democratic nominee is still not decided. This is still anyone’s game. Joe Biden has everything to lose and Bernie Sanders everything to gain.
In the meantime, we’ll see how cool “Uncle Joe” can remain.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-23--Hillary: Democrats Need to Expand Media Control In Order to Influence Thinking of Americans

Hillary Clinton , in an interview with The Hollywood Reporter , said she believes Democrats need to get greater control of the media as a means to “ influence the thinking of Americans.
” In the discussion , THR ’ s reporter asked the former First Lady how the left can combat Fox News .
Because the lone right-of-center mainstream media outlet needs to be stopped , apparently .
Hillary was all too eager to offer up her thoughts , lamenting how Fox has allegedly produced “ propaganda ” and the left needs to step up their game as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We do have some well-off people who support Democratic candidates , there ’ s no doubt about that , but they ’ ve never bought a TV station , ” she replied .
“ They ’ ve never gobbled up radio stations.
” “ They ’ ve never created newspapers in local communities to put out propaganda , ” Clinton added , suggesting people like Rupert Murdoch at Fox and the dreaded Koch brothers have and have “ played a long game about how we really influence the thinking of Americans.
” She @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own perceived fire .
Completely ignoring the fact that while Fox leans right , NBC , CBS , ABC , CNN , MSNBC , Vox , and most major print newspapers are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Democrat party .
RELATED : Hillary Slams Bernie : ‘ Nobody Likes Him ’ and His Supporters are Misogynists Blames the Media For Her Failures Among the myriad of other excuses Mrs. Clinton has offered over the past few years for her embarrassing election loss to President Trump , the media has been a particular target @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New York Times for reporting on her email scandal saying it ultimately “ affected the outcome of the election.
” The former Democratic presidential candidate also suggested – ridiculously – that the media didn ’ t cover her in a positive light nearly as much as they should have .
“ When you have a presidential campaign and the total number of minutes on TV news … was 32 minutes , I don ’ t blame voters , ” she told the ladies of The View .
“ Voters are going to hear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t get a broad base of information to make judgments on.
” Maybe they couldn ’ t cover her as much because they spent 90 percent of their coverage manufacturing scandals for Clinton ’ s opponent and covering him in a strictly negative light .
RELATED : CNN Panelist : It ’ s the Media ’ s Job to Change Voters Minds in 2020 Wants to Control What Americans Believe Perhaps even more chilling than suggesting the left needs to step in and influence the way people think , is Hillary ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emulate Barack and Michelle Obama by using Hollywood to “ impact the culture and what people see and therefore what they believe.
” While nothing has been finalized , Clinton says she is in talks about launching a production company like the Obama ’ s have with Netflix and Spotify .
“ The Obamas are absolutely right that you ’ ve got to impact the culture and what people see and therefore what they believe if you ’ re going to impact the politics and to preserve our democracy , ” Hillary expressed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made a very smart decision , and maybe someday we will , too , ” she warned .
This past summer a guest on CNN suggested : “ We [ the media ] can change voters ’ minds for 2020 , that ’ s what we can do if we keep speaking forcefully , and we talk about morality.
” Hillary and the media are in lockstep on this topic .
Clinton didn ’ t lose because she ’ s a terrible candidate , American cities aren ’ t being decimated because of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t successful in making America great again because of conservative platforms .
It ’ s because you ’ re too dumb to know what ’ s good for you .
In their minds , that has to change .

Hillary Clinton, in an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, said she believes Democrats need to get greater control of the media as a means to “influence the thinking of Americans.”
In the discussion, THR’s reporter asked the former First Lady how the left can combat Fox News. Because the lone right-of-center mainstream media outlet needs to be stopped, apparently.
Hillary was all too eager to offer up her thoughts, lamenting how Fox has allegedly produced “propaganda” and the left needs to step up their game as a means of controlling the narrative.
“We do have some well-off people who support Democratic candidates, there’s no doubt about that, but they’ve never bought a TV station,” she replied. “They’ve never gobbled up radio stations.”
“They’ve never created newspapers in local communities to put out propaganda,” Clinton added, suggesting people like Rupert Murdoch at Fox and the dreaded Koch brothers have and have “played a long game about how we really influence the thinking of Americans.”
She’s suggesting fighting fire with her own perceived fire. Completely ignoring the fact that while Fox leans right, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, Vox, and most major print newspapers are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Democrat party.
**Move over FBI, James Comey, Google, Facebook, Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama, sexism, racism, media, DNC, Electoral College, local newspapers, gerrymandering, voter suppression, Russia… Hillary now blames SUPREME COURT for her 2016 loss.** https://t.co/1xBq8FZc4Q — Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) September 17, 2019
RELATED: Hillary Slams Bernie: ‘Nobody Likes Him’ and His Supporters are Misogynists
Blames the Media For Her Failures
Among the myriad of other excuses Mrs. Clinton has offered over the past few years for her embarrassing election loss to President Trump, the media has been a particular target of her scorn.
She blamed the New York Times for reporting on her email scandal saying it ultimately “affected the outcome of the election.”
The former Democratic presidential candidate also suggested – ridiculously – that the media didn’t cover her in a positive light nearly as much as they should have.
“When you have a presidential campaign and the total number of minutes on TV news … was 32 minutes, I don’t blame voters,” she told the ladies of The View. “Voters are going to hear what they hear … They don’t get a broad base of information to make judgments on.”
Maybe they couldn’t cover her as much because they spent 90 percent of their coverage manufacturing scandals for Clinton’s opponent and covering him in a strictly negative light.
Think you’re biased!? @DavidZurawik on CNN: “He’s so far down this road of evil….We can change voters’ minds for 2020. That’s what we can do if we keep speaking forcefully….Journalists do not talk enough about morality because we think people will think we’re biased.” pic.twitter.com/qMrbLrsV37 — Brent Baker (@BrentHBaker) July 28, 2019
RELATED: CNN Panelist: It’s the Media’s Job to Change Voters Minds in 2020
Wants to Control What Americans Believe
Perhaps even more chilling than suggesting the left needs to step in and influence the way people think, is Hillary’s suggestion that she’d like to emulate Barack and Michelle Obama by using Hollywood to “impact the culture and what people see and therefore what they believe.”
While nothing has been finalized, Clinton says she is in talks about launching a production company like the Obama’s have with Netflix and Spotify.
“The Obamas are absolutely right that you’ve got to impact the culture and what people see and therefore what they believe if you’re going to impact the politics and to preserve our democracy,” Hillary expressed.
“So, I think they made a very smart decision, and maybe someday we will, too,” she warned.
This past summer a guest on CNN suggested: “We [the media] can change voters’ minds for 2020, that’s what we can do if we keep speaking forcefully, and we talk about morality.”
Hillary and the media are in lockstep on this topic. Clinton didn’t lose because she’s a terrible candidate, American cities aren’t being decimated because of liberal policies, and President Trump isn’t successful in making America great again because of conservative platforms.
It’s because you’re too dumb to know what’s good for you. In their minds, that has to change.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-23--Chinese Virus May Have Been Exposed to 21 Students in Virginia

Like a scene from a classic sci-fi thriller like “ The Andromeda Strain , ” a fatal Chinese coronavirus that has broken out in the city and province of Wuhan may be present in America .
Inadvertently causing this possible threat are 21 Chinese exchange students from the same province in China .
They were scheduled on Wednesday to attend classes in Falls Church , VA .
Multiple media outlets confirm this information .
RELATED : DOJ : Down Syndrome Is No Justification for Abortion Fairfax County Public Schools , the students are at Longfellow Middle School , last night @ @ @ @ @ @ @ class until February 3rd .
The just-arrived students will instead stay at hotels and visit tourist and cultural sites , which is odd because if they have the virus won ’ t the chance of contagion be greater at public venues ?
At this point , there have not been signs of the virus amongst students or staff .
The incubation period is three to 14 days .
The Chinese regime has restricted travel in several cities and suspended public transportation in the Wuhan epicenter of the virus .
The government is trying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that has killed 17 and sickened 500 and counting .
18 million people are thought to be potentially affected by the spread of the disease , 11 million in Wuhan immediately so .
In a nation like China , where hundreds of millions reside in the close quarters of its teeming cities , that number could grow exponentially to a level that would classify it as a pandemic readily able to surmount national boundaries in a single bound .
Gauden Galea , of the World Health Organization , told The Associated Press , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To my knowledge , trying to contain a city of 11 million people is new to science .
It has not been tried before as a public health measure .
We can not at this stage say it will or it won ’ t work.
” If the peril were to spread outside of Wuhan , perhaps even outside of China and Asia , and successfully jump to the U.S. , the public health threat could be grim .
If the virus goes airborne , spread by American travelers from China already back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ visit to a movie theater or a grocery store could act as the accelerant to a health brushfire that could turn into a conflagration making the plot of the film “ Outbreak ” seem gentle by comparison .
U.S. public health officials are closely monitoring the situation .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47 Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning Liberals Shamelessly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ During Visit to MLK Memorial

By David Kamioner | January 23, 2020
Like a scene from a classic sci-fi thriller like “The Andromeda Strain,” a fatal Chinese coronavirus that has broken out in the city and province of Wuhan may be present in America.
Inadvertently causing this possible threat are 21 Chinese exchange students from the same province in China.
They were scheduled on Wednesday to attend classes in Falls Church, VA. Multiple media outlets confirm this information.
RELATED: DOJ: Down Syndrome Is No Justification for Abortion
Fairfax County Public Schools, the students are at Longfellow Middle School, last night decided to bar the students from attending class until February 3rd.
The just-arrived students will instead stay at hotels and visit tourist and cultural sites, which is odd because if they have the virus won’t the chance of contagion be greater at public venues?
At this point, there have not been signs of the virus amongst students or staff. The incubation period is three to 14 days.
The Chinese regime has restricted travel in several cities and suspended public transportation in the Wuhan epicenter of the virus. The government is trying to stop the spread of the pestilence that has killed 17 and sickened 500 and counting.
18 million people are thought to be potentially affected by the spread of the disease, 11 million in Wuhan immediately so.
In a nation like China, where hundreds of millions reside in the close quarters of its teeming cities, that number could grow exponentially to a level that would classify it as a pandemic readily able to surmount national boundaries in a single bound.
RELATED: Pro-Life Advocates Arrested Outside Nancy Pelosi’s Office
Gauden Galea, of the World Health Organization, told The Associated Press, concerning the quarantine of Wuhan, “To my knowledge, trying to contain a city of 11 million people is new to science. It has not been tried before as a public health measure. We cannot at this stage say it will or it won’t work.”
If the peril were to spread outside of Wuhan, perhaps even outside of China and Asia, and successfully jump to the U.S., the public health threat could be grim.
If the virus goes airborne, spread by American travelers from China already back from that country, then a simple visit to a movie theater or a grocery store could act as the accelerant to a health brushfire that could turn into a conflagration making the plot of the film “Outbreak” seem gentle by comparison.
U.S. public health officials are closely monitoring the situation.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47
Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning
Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com DOJ: Down Syndrome Is No Justification for Abortion
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-23--DOJ: Down Syndrome Is No Justification for Abortion

In a move that is sure to win favor with pro-lifers present at the March for Life in DC on Friday , the Trump Department of Justice Wednesday announced it was siding with the state of Ohio regarding a controversial bill that does not permit doctors to perform abortions solely on the basis of a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome .
A physician performing the procedure on a child with the condition would face a fourth-degree felony charge , loss of their medical license , and other legal damages .
The law will be brought before the 6th Court of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Supreme Court has found that any legislative measure that “ substantially burdens ” a female from terminating a pregnancy through abortion is unconstitutional .
The Trump DOJ argues that “ nothing in Ohio ’ s [ Down syndrome ] law creates a substantial obstacle to women obtaining an abortion.
” RELATED : Trump First President in History to Speak at March for Life It is stupefying that , after totalitarian experiments in eugenics ( the supposed process of improving races and the species by selective breeding and birth ) , and our own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ early 20th century , that there are those who would advocate killing unborn infants on the basis of health superiority .
Though sadly , there is precedence .
The eugenics movement was once so influential in America that even a respected jurist such as Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes , Jr. said in the majority opinion in the 1927 Buck v. Bell case , the case concerned eugenics measures in Virginia , that “ It would be strange if it ( Virginia ) could not call upon those who already sap the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sacrifices , often not felt to be such by those concerned , to prevent our being swamped with incompetence .
It is better for all the world , if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime , or to let them starve for their imbecility , society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.
” Holmes concluded , “ Three generations of imbeciles are enough ” .
Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger , along with many other prominent individuals and organizations , also supported eugenics .
After @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States it was employed en masse by Nazi Germany to genocidal results .
That is the legacy those who wish to abort Down syndrome babies take on as their own .
However , the state of Ohio and the Trump DOJ do not ascribe to these inhumane notions .
We are a better nation because they don ’ t .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial

By David Kamioner | January 23, 2020
In a move that is sure to win favor with pro-lifers present at the March for Life in DC on Friday, the Trump Department of Justice Wednesday announced it was siding with the state of Ohio regarding a controversial bill that does not permit doctors to perform abortions solely on the basis of a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome.
A physician performing the procedure on a child with the condition would face a fourth-degree felony charge, loss of their medical license, and other legal damages. The law will be brought before the 6th Court of Appeals for a decision.
The U.S. Supreme Court has found that any legislative measure that “substantially burdens” a female from terminating a pregnancy through abortion is unconstitutional. The Trump DOJ argues that “nothing in Ohio’s [Down syndrome] law creates a substantial obstacle to women obtaining an abortion.”
RELATED: Trump First President in History to Speak at March for Life
It is stupefying that, after totalitarian experiments in eugenics (the supposed process of improving races and the species by selective breeding and birth), and our own dangerous walk down that path in the early 20th century, that there are those who would advocate killing unborn infants on the basis of health superiority.
Though sadly, there is precedence.
The eugenics movement was once so influential in America that even a respected jurist such as Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. said in the majority opinion in the 1927 Buck v. Bell case, the case concerned eugenics measures in Virginia, that “It would be strange if it (Virginia) could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, to prevent our being swamped with incompetence.
It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.” Holmes concluded, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough”.
RELATED: Pro-Life Advocates Arrested Outside Nancy Pelosi’s Office
Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, along with many other prominent individuals and organizations, also supported eugenics.
After the cold-blooded theory thankfully lost credence in the United States it was employed en masse by Nazi Germany to genocidal results.
That is the legacy those who wish to abort Down syndrome babies take on as their own.
However, the state of Ohio and the Trump DOJ do not ascribe to these inhumane notions. We are a better nation because they don’t.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47
Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning
Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Steven Mnuchin Tells Greta Thunberg to Get An Education, Then Talk Economics
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-23--Schiff Resurrects Domino Theory

Schiff Resurrects Domino Theory

This article is far too short a space to list all of the instances from 1945-1991 that the U.S. Democratic Party hosted communist agents of influence or worse or took the communist line in national security matters .
From Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White to Henry Wallace , from Tom Hayden to the Dear Commandante Letter , from Ted Kennedy asking the Soviets to intervene in the 1984 American presidential election to the modern socialist ideals of today ’ s Dems , this party has tilted hard left even at the expense of U.S. combat troops in the field @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in bringing up the scary Russians now , especially after said Russians were defanged by GOP defense and foreign policies they consistently opposed for decades .
But credibility and the massive lack of it does not concern Dems .
Hence why Adam Schiff felt comfortable invoking the Domino Theory ( the idea that if one nation falls others will as well , leading right up to our shores .
It was used by LBJ to rationalize our involvement in the Vietnam War ) in a Senate impeachment trial diatribe against President Trump .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Throw Out Impeachment This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47 Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial

By David Kamioner | January 23, 2020
This article is far too short a space to list all of the instances from 1945-1991 that the U.S. Democratic Party hosted communist agents of influence or worse or took the communist line in national security matters.
From Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White to Henry Wallace, from Tom Hayden to the Dear Commandante Letter, from Ted Kennedy asking the Soviets to intervene in the 1984 American presidential election to the modern socialist ideals of today’s Dems, this party has tilted hard left even at the expense of U.S. combat troops in the field.
So that gives them little credibility in bringing up the scary Russians now, especially after said Russians were defanged by GOP defense and foreign policies they consistently opposed for decades.
But credibility and the massive lack of it does not concern Dems.
Hence why Adam Schiff felt comfortable invoking the Domino Theory (the idea that if one nation falls others will as well, leading right up to our shores. It was used by LBJ to rationalize our involvement in the Vietnam War) in a Senate impeachment trial diatribe against President Trump.
RELATED: States Speak Up Asking Senate to Throw Out Impeachment
“As one witness put it during our impeachment inquiry, the United States aids Ukraine and her people so that we can fight Russia over there, and we don’t have to fight Russia here,” Schiff incredibly said. Wow. Just wow. It is akin to Martin Bormann standing in front of a synagogue and vowing, “Never Again.” Aside from Schiff’s unintentionally comic highlight day two proceeded much like day one, substituting nonstop Dem babbling for a GOP 11-0 rout of the disloyal opposition. Schiff, in his amazing capacity to shock with sheer stupidity, also made the argument that the president needed to be removed because he poses a threat to an election that hasn’t happened yet and which the outline of is nowhere near clear. Yes, Trump has already, by Schiff’s reasoning, fixed the 2020 bout. RELATED: Chief Justice Roberts Forced to Play Referee During Impeachment Trials Neat trick, that. Well, by that logic, let’s exclude any candidate from any future election because they potentially could “cheat” (Schiff’s favorite word as of late) and thus render democracy impotent. Does the hair bronzer-using guy ever listen to his own words? Or are they drowned by the sharply pinging sounds of his mental process throwing pistons? Either way, we only have another two days of it and the GOP mercifully comes to bat. Proof, there is a God.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47
Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning
Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com CNN Analyst: Yeah, I Made Up That Conversation Between Two Senators Shocked At Trump’s Action
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-24--Dems Have Had A Chance To Show They Care For The Rule Of Law For Over 20 Years — And Failed

The Articles of Impeachment were a forgone conclusion , from the morning after the election , and before the then-GOP candidate , Donald Trump took over the Presidency .
The only question was which specific charges would be included .
But , as Nancy Pelosi has infamously said earlier , you have to vote FOR them , to find out what they may contain .
The Democrat party has proven itself wholly and utterly unfit to lead .
IF they had any involvement in the incredible past three years of economic development and wealth creation , they would at least @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of value .
RELATED : Opinion : If The Dems Case Is So Strong And So Obvious , As They Insist , Why Need More Docs And Witnesses ?
Still , they did nothing but “ protest , ” complain , and lie to the American people at every turn .
The results of the upcoming election will be theirs to own , as voters take them to task for their failures .
Seventy-five million ( 75,000,0000 ) , that ’ s the number of votes Trump will get this election .
Mark @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least one more seat in the Senate , and the Democrats will lose the House .
You ’ ll see .
Democrats had the chance to show how much they care about Rule of Law numerous times over the past 20 years , starting in the late 90s with Clinton ’ s impeachment , and their vote that obstruction of justice didn ’ t warrant impeachment , to “ sanctuary laws ” and pretending immigration law is exempt from the concept of Rule of Law .
Rep. Adam Schiff keeps saying that there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and “ the extensive evidence ” that was collected in the House impeachment process will be given .
So if the House has done its job , there ’ s no need for additional witnesses , and the Senate can make their determination on the case the House managers present .
Remember , every “ star ” witness called by the Democrats was asked on cross-examination if they witnessed the president committing any crimes – and everyone said “ no.
” Let ’ s say this again .
It is NOT the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That task is up to the House of Reps , which is what they are supposed to use to decide whether to bring Articles of Impeachment .
Obviously , they ’ ve decided to bring Articles of Impeachment and then try to find evidence to support them .
RELATED : Opinion : This Impeachment Is Based Only On Political Desire And Opinion , Not The Constitution Or The Law This is just a bunch of nervous Democrats fearing that if they don ’ t get rid of a president that is getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ affecting their bank accounts , they will be out of a job .
Senate trials have ONE purpose .
To remove officials who have done very serious crimes .
Bill Clinton committed a felony ( lying under oath ) , and he was not removed .
Nixon committed a felony and resigned instead of going through a Senate trial in which he would have been pronounced guilty .
What we are looking at here are hardly crimes , if crimes at all .
They certainly are not worthy of a Senate trial .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that this could be nothing other than a sham .
• Internet Explodes Over Shocking Photo of Schiff From Senate Trial “ Looks Like He ’ s on a 7 Day Meth Binge ” • VIDEO : Three Teens Killed As Suspect Intentionally Slams His Car Into Their Car During “ Ding-Dong-Ditch ” ‘ Prank

The Articles of Impeachment were a forgone conclusion, from the morning after the election, and before the then-GOP candidate, Donald Trump took over the Presidency.
The only question was which specific charges would be included. But, as Nancy Pelosi has infamously said earlier, you have to vote FOR them, to find out what they may contain.
The Democrat party has proven itself wholly and utterly unfit to lead. IF they had any involvement in the incredible past three years of economic development and wealth creation, they would at least be able to say they did something of value.
RELATED: Opinion: If The Dems Case Is So Strong And So Obvious, As They Insist, Why Need More Docs And Witnesses?
Still, they did nothing but “protest,” complain, and lie to the American people at every turn. The results of the upcoming election will be theirs to own, as voters take them to task for their failures. Seventy-five million (75,000,0000), that’s the number of votes Trump will get this election. Mark my word. Republicans will win at least one more seat in the Senate, and the Democrats will lose the House. You’ll see.
Democrats had the chance to show how much they care about Rule of Law numerous times over the past 20 years, starting in the late 90s with Clinton’s impeachment, and their vote that obstruction of justice didn’t warrant impeachment, to “sanctuary laws” and pretending immigration law is exempt from the concept of Rule of Law.
Rep. Adam Schiff keeps saying that there is overwhelming evidence that has been presented, and “the extensive evidence” that was collected in the House impeachment process will be given. So if the House has done its job, there’s no need for additional witnesses, and the Senate can make their determination on the case the House managers present.
Remember, every “star” witness called by the Democrats was asked on cross-examination if they witnessed the president committing any crimes – and everyone said “no.”
Let’s say this again. It is NOT the responsibility of the Senate to find evidence. That task is up to the House of Reps, which is what they are supposed to use to decide whether to bring Articles of Impeachment. Obviously, they’ve decided to bring Articles of Impeachment and then try to find evidence to support them.
RELATED: Opinion: This Impeachment Is Based Only On Political Desire And Opinion, Not The Constitution Or The Law
This is just a bunch of nervous Democrats fearing that if they don’t get rid of a president that is getting closer to exposing their dirty games and affecting their bank accounts, they will be out of a job.
Senate trials have ONE purpose. To remove officials who have done very serious crimes. Bill Clinton committed a felony (lying under oath), and he was not removed. Nixon committed a felony and resigned instead of going through a Senate trial in which he would have been pronounced guilty. What we are looking at here are hardly crimes, if crimes at all. They certainly are not worthy of a Senate trial.
Once you understand that, you know that this could be nothing other than a sham.
More Stories From WayneDupree.com


thepoliticalinsider--2020-01-23--Bloomberg Trolls Trump and then Loses the Ball

President Trump and Dem primary candidate Mike Bloomberg traded barbs over Twitter Thursday , as Trump accused the former NYC mayor of covertly planning to abandon the Dems if he doesn ’ t get the nomination .
Bloomberg is currently promising to fund the Dem campaign all the way through November , which Trump says is buying him a waiver on political strikes .
Also included in the tweet is a story about a campaign spot Bloomberg is running against Trump .
In the spot Bloomberg , very shrewdly , hits Trump from the right to appeal to moderate Dem @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in keeping with Bloomberg ’ s hold your fire until Super Tuesday strategy of playing rope-a-dope until that group of primaries on March 3rd .
RELATED : States Speak Up Asking Senate to Throw Out Impeachment But still more interesting is his succinct tweet response to the president .
No histrionics , no drama , no weird screaming leftism .
What we see there from the Bloomberg team is concise calculated on target sarcasm .
He seems to have bought a sharp media team with his billions .
Party-hopping Manhattan mogul vs. party-hopping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interesting fall race .
But all is not rosy for the former GOP and then Independent mayor .
Wednesday he inexplicably went after Texas hero Jack Wilson .
Wilson ’ s quickdraw response saved countless lives when a gunman opened fire in a church last month .
Bloomberg opined on Wilson , “ Yes , it may be true — I wasn ’ t there and I don ’ t know the facts — that somebody in the congregation had their own gun and killed the person who murdered two other people .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ law enforcement to have guns and to decide when to shoot .
You just do not want the average citizen carrying a gun in a crowded place.
” Either the same media team that produced the superb response to the tweet dropped the ball bigtime on this one , insulting a national hero and a man wildly popular especially in the south , or the candidate was solo riffing off-script and reverted to his Manhattan nanny state tendencies .
Which Bloomberg will we see before and after Super Tuesday ?
The canny operator @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to say it to a moderate audience , as in the tweet , or the liberal NYC politician who is handicapped by his quiche and Chardonnay political ideology ?
Stay tuned to LZ for the answer .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47 Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK @

By David Kamioner | January 23, 2020
President Trump and Dem primary candidate Mike Bloomberg traded barbs over Twitter Thursday, as Trump accused the former NYC mayor of covertly planning to abandon the Dems if he doesn’t get the nomination.
Bloomberg is currently promising to fund the Dem campaign all the way through November, which Trump says is buying him a waiver on political strikes.
Here’s the president’s attack.
Mini Mike Bloomberg is playing poker with his foolhardy and unsuspecting Democrat rivals. He says that if he loses (he really means when!) in the primaries, he will spend money helping whoever the Democrat nominee is. By doing this, he figures, they won’t hit him as hard…. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 23, 2020
And Bloomberg’s response.
Obsessed much? It shouldn't be this easy to distract the President of the United States. https://t.co/rCSIBIKbkF https://t.co/LMgqvV9PAH — Mike Bloomberg (@MikeBloomberg) January 23, 2020
Also included in the tweet is a story about a campaign spot Bloomberg is running against Trump. In the spot Bloomberg, very shrewdly, hits Trump from the right to appeal to moderate Dem votes in the south. This is in keeping with Bloomberg’s hold your fire until Super Tuesday strategy of playing rope-a-dope until that group of primaries on March 3rd.
RELATED: States Speak Up Asking Senate to Throw Out Impeachment
But still more interesting is his succinct tweet response to the president.
No histrionics, no drama, no weird screaming leftism. What we see there from the Bloomberg team is concise calculated on target sarcasm. He seems to have bought a sharp media team with his billions.
Party-hopping Manhattan mogul vs. party-hopping Manhattan mogul. It would be an interesting fall race.
But all is not rosy for the former GOP and then Independent mayor.
Wednesday he inexplicably went after Texas hero Jack Wilson. Wilson’s quickdraw response saved countless lives when a gunman opened fire in a church last month.
Bloomberg opined on Wilson, “Yes, it may be true — I wasn’t there and I don’t know the facts — that somebody in the congregation had their own gun and killed the person who murdered two other people. But it’s the job of law enforcement to have guns and to decide when to shoot. You just do not want the average citizen carrying a gun in a crowded place.”
Either the same media team that produced the superb response to the tweet dropped the ball bigtime on this one, insulting a national hero and a man wildly popular especially in the south, or the candidate was solo riffing off-script and reverted to his Manhattan nanny state tendencies.
RELATED: Tulsi Gabbard Announces $50M Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton
Which Bloomberg will we see before and after Super Tuesday?
The canny operator who knows what to say and when to say it to a moderate audience, as in the tweet, or the liberal NYC politician who is handicapped by his quiche and Chardonnay political ideology?
Stay tuned to LZ for the answer.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
President Trump Wins His First Impeachment Trial Victory as Senate Votes 53 to 47
Tim Tebow Officially Tied the Knot and Their Wedding Photos Are Stunning
Liberals Shamelessly Boo President Trump and Vice President Pence During Visit to MLK Memorial
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Boston Poll Puts Sanders on Top in New Hampshire
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.