thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-09--Ted Cruz Has Dire Warning For Republicans: Without Optimism, Election Could Be ‘Bloodbath’

Senator Ted Cruz commented on the volatility he ’ s sensing in the upcoming election , saying President Trump could win big or it could be a Republican “ bloodbath.
” Cruz ( R-TX ) , speaking on CNBC ’ s “ Squawk Box , ” said the election will hinge on how the American people perceive the economy and Trump ’ s handling of the pandemic .
“ If people are going back to work , if they ’ re optimistic , if they ’ re positive about the future , we could see a fantastic election.
” Those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the president getting reelected with a big margin ” and “ Republicans winning both houses of Congress.
” RELATED : Voters Overwhelmingly Agree They ’ re Better Off Now Than They Were Four Years Ago Cruz : Trump Could Win Or It Could Be a Bloodbath It ’ s safe to say Senator Cruz doesn ’ t think there is a middle ground in this election – predicting either Democrats will win big or Republicans will .
While saying a GOP sweep is still a possibility , Cruz also said economic and pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ completely opposite direction .
Pessimism could usher in a defeat of historic proportions .
“ I also think if on Election Day people are angry and they ’ ve given up hope and they ’ re depressed , which is what [ Speaker Nancy ] Pelosi and [ Senate Minority Leader Charles ] Schumer want them to be , I think it could be a terrible election , ” he added .
“ I think we could lose the White House and both houses of Congress , that it could be a bloodbath @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Debate Moderator Steve Scully Posts Strange Tweet About Trump , C-SPAN Claims He Was Hacked Both topics Cruz mentions – COVID and the economy – loomed large at this week ’ s vice presidential debate .
Should President Trump prove his case that he is more adept at leading the country out of the pandemic and back to the roaring economy he helped create prior to the pandemic , the election will be his to win .
Trump “ turned this economy around by cutting taxes , rolling back regulation , unleashing American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trade , ” Vice President Mike Pence argued .
“ All of that is on the line if Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are in the White House.
” A new poll from Pew Research suggests the economy remains the one area where President Trump holds an edge over Biden .
Additionally , a new Gallup survey shows that registered voters overwhelmingly believe they are better off under Trump than they were four years ago under the Obama-Biden administration .
With an historic level of voters believing they are better off under his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s to lose .

Senator Ted Cruz commented on the volatility he’s sensing in the upcoming election, saying President Trump could win big or it could be a Republican “bloodbath.”
Cruz (R-TX), speaking on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” said the election will hinge on how the American people perceive the economy and Trump’s handling of the pandemic.
“It’s volatile, it’s highly volatile,” he explained.
“If people are going back to work, if they’re optimistic, if they’re positive about the future, we could see a fantastic election.”
Those ‘fantastic’ results could include “the president getting reelected with a big margin” and “Republicans winning both houses of Congress.”
Cruz said, “I think that’s a real possibility.”
Ted Cruz says he’s worried about the election pic.twitter.com/WWtoaxoRrJ — Acyn Torabi (@Acyn) October 7, 2020
RELATED: Voters Overwhelmingly Agree They’re Better Off Now Than They Were Four Years Ago
Cruz: Trump Could Win Or It Could Be a Bloodbath
It’s safe to say Senator Cruz doesn’t think there is a middle ground in this election – predicting either Democrats will win big or Republicans will.
While saying a GOP sweep is still a possibility, Cruz also said economic and pandemic numbers could swing the election in a completely opposite direction.
Pessimism could usher in a defeat of historic proportions.
“I also think if on Election Day people are angry and they’ve given up hope and they’re depressed, which is what [Speaker Nancy] Pelosi and [Senate Minority Leader Charles] Schumer want them to be, I think it could be a terrible election,” he added.
“I think we could lose the White House and both houses of Congress, that it could be a bloodbath of Watergate proportions.”
Ted Cruz warns the election ‘could be a bloodbath of Watergate proportions’ for GOP https://t.co/L2VIhrDghE — CNBC (@CNBC) October 9, 2020
RELATED: Second Debate Moderator Steve Scully Posts Strange Tweet About Trump, C-SPAN Claims He Was Hacked
It’s The Economy, Stupid!
Both topics Cruz mentions – COVID and the economy – loomed large at this week’s vice presidential debate.
Should President Trump prove his case that he is more adept at leading the country out of the pandemic and back to the roaring economy he helped create prior to the pandemic, the election will be his to win.
Trump “turned this economy around by cutting taxes, rolling back regulation, unleashing American energy, fighting for free and fair trade,” Vice President Mike Pence argued.
“All of that is on the line if Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are in the White House.”
Biden/Harris will raise your taxes. Fact Check: True. VP Biden said so last week when he said he would repeal the Trump tax cuts. Their $3T tax hike is the wrong medicine for our economy anytime, but especially harmful during this pandemic. — Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) October 8, 2020
A new poll from Pew Research suggests the economy remains the one area where President Trump holds an edge over Biden.
Additionally, a new Gallup survey shows that registered voters overwhelmingly believe they are better off under Trump than they were four years ago under the Obama-Biden administration.
With an historic level of voters believing they are better off under his Presidency, the election is Trump’s to lose.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-09--Voters Overwhelmingly Agree They’re Better Off Now Than They Were Four Years Ago

A new Gallup survey shows registered voters overwhelmingly believe they are better off under President Trump than they were four years ago under Obama-Biden .
The numbers are rather startling considering national polls show former Vice President Joe Biden leading Trump by wide margins nationally .
A summary of the poll reads : “ Gallup ’ s most recent survey found a clear majority of registered voters ( 56 % ) saying they are better off now than they were four years ago , while 32 % said they are worse off.
” That is an 11 point increase over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2012 .
It should be noted that this survey was conducted prior to two events that may have hurt Trump in the polls – the presidential debate , and the President ’ s coronavirus diagnosis .
RELATED : Squad , Progressive Group Roll Out Plan To Force Biden to Implement Their Far-Left Agenda America is Better Off Under Trump Than They Were Under Biden It was Ronald Reagan who famously asked during his presidential campaign in 1980 , “ Are you better off today than you were four years ago ?
” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against Democrat President Jimmy Carter and launched Reagan to a huge popular vote and Electoral College victory .
Remarkably , according to Gallup , Reagan ’ s “ better off ” percentage was only at 44 percent in 1984 .
He still went on to obliterate Walter Mondale , 525 electoral votes to 13 .
In fact , Trump ’ s ‘ better off ’ numbers are higher than any poll conducted since then – George H.W .
Bush in 1992 ( 38 % ) , George W. Bush in 2004 ( 47 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( 45 % ) .
Trump ’ s numbers are the only clear majority – well over 50 percent – whereas , two of the previously mentioned Presidents easily won re-election .
RELATED : Trump Hits Back At Michelle Obama With ‘ World On Fire ’ Video After She Calls Him ‘ Racist ’ Approval Ratings On Par With Other Presidents Who Won Re-Election The ‘ better off ’ poll comes despite a global pandemic and Democrat-led shutdowns that have ruined the economy .
Even after everything the country has gone through , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being in a better position than they were under the Obama administration .
Could the media be wrong about the President ?
President Trump aggressively responded to the coronavirus by shutting down travel with China and launching the greatest mobilization of American industry since World War II .
Meanwhile , his policy agenda of cutting taxes for the middle class has created the conditions for what the Trump campaign describes as the Great American Comeback .
Trump ’ s latest approval rating is dead-on with Obama ’ s average at 46 % and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % .
The Gallup poll also shows 49 percent of registered voters agree with the President on the issues , compared to 46 percent who side with Biden .
When it comes to presidential qualities , however , Biden leads Trump 49-44 percent .

A new Gallup survey shows registered voters overwhelmingly believe they are better off under President Trump than they were four years ago under Obama-Biden.
The numbers are rather startling considering national polls show former Vice President Joe Biden leading Trump by wide margins nationally.
A summary of the poll reads: “Gallup’s most recent survey found a clear majority of registered voters (56%) saying they are better off now than they were four years ago, while 32% said they are worse off.”
That is an 11 point increase over the numbers the Obama-Biden administration received in 2012.
It should be noted that this survey was conducted prior to two events that may have hurt Trump in the polls – the presidential debate, and the President’s coronavirus diagnosis.
The Gallup Poll has just come out with the incredible finding that 56% of you say that you are better off today, during a pandemic, than you were four years ago (OBiden). Highest number on record! Pretty amazing! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 9, 2020
RELATED: Squad, Progressive Group Roll Out Plan To Force Biden to Implement Their Far-Left Agenda
America is Better Off Under Trump Than They Were Under Biden
It was Ronald Reagan who famously asked during his presidential campaign in 1980, “Are you better off today than you were four years ago?”
The question was posed during a tight race against Democrat President Jimmy Carter and launched Reagan to a huge popular vote and Electoral College victory.
Remarkably, according to Gallup, Reagan’s “better off” percentage was only at 44 percent in 1984.
He still went on to obliterate Walter Mondale, 525 electoral votes to 13.
Gallup: “Most Say They Are Better Off Now Than Four Years Ago” (by over 10 points)https://t.co/GMzAahXhcf pic.twitter.com/wfeNyYwK99 — Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) October 9, 2020
In fact, Trump’s ‘better off’ numbers are higher than any poll conducted since then – George H.W. Bush in 1992 (38%), George W. Bush in 2004 (47%) and Barack Obama in 2012 (45%).
Trump’s numbers are the only clear majority – well over 50 percent – whereas, two of the previously mentioned Presidents easily won re-election.
Gallup: 56% say they’re better off than they were four years ago, and Trump leads Biden 49/46 on the “I agree with him on issues” metric. But Trump tumbles eight net points on the question of “presidential qualities.” That’s the ballgame right now. *He* is why he’s trailing. — Guy Benson (@guypbenson) October 9, 2020
RELATED: Trump Hits Back At Michelle Obama With ‘World On Fire’ Video After She Calls Him ‘Racist’
Approval Ratings On Par With Other Presidents Who Won Re-Election
The ‘better off’ poll comes despite a global pandemic and Democrat-led shutdowns that have ruined the economy.
Even after everything the country has gone through, the American people still view themselves as being in a better position than they were under the Obama administration.
Could the media be wrong about the President?
President Trump aggressively responded to the coronavirus by shutting down travel with China and launching the greatest mobilization of American industry since World War II.
Meanwhile, his policy agenda of cutting taxes for the middle class has created the conditions for what the Trump campaign describes as the Great American Comeback.
Another great jobs report! Unemployment fell to 7.9% and over a half a million jobs were added. Thanks to @realDonaldTrump the Great American Comeback is STILL happening! — Tommy Hicks (@TommyHicksGOP) October 2, 2020
Trump’s latest approval rating is dead-on with Obama’s average at 46% and higher than Bush’s at 36%.
The Gallup poll also shows 49 percent of registered voters agree with the President on the issues, compared to 46 percent who side with Biden.
When it comes to presidential qualities, however, Biden leads Trump 49-44 percent.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-09--90 Percent Of Protesters Arrested In Portland In The Past Month Have Had Charges Dropped

Over the past month , police in Portland , Oregon have arrested over 200 people involved in the radically leftwing protests that have continued to overtake the city .
However , it has since been revealed that a whopping 90 percent of those who have been taken into custody have had charges dropped .
The Portland Police Bureau , as well as Oregon State Police , made 213 arrests in September , according to KOIN .
This was down from the 295 arrests that were made in August , which was a record for the city .
In both August @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demonstrators were arrested on was interfering with a police officer , followed by disorderly conduct and riot .
The Multnomah County District Attorney ’ s Office has decided to “ presumptively decline to prosecute ” on all three of these charges , which is how 90 percent of those who were arrested have gotten off scot free .
RELATED : Portland Cop Drives Motorcycle Into Leftwing Rioter Blocking His Path – Her Comrades Go Wild The district attorney ’ s office explained that this policy was designed to “ focus limited prosecution resources @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , assaultive behavior and actions that create a risk of injury or property destruction during a mass demonstration.
” It was reported that as of October 5 , charges had been dropped in around 90 % of the cases that stemmed from September ’ s protest activity .
Nearly 10 percent of those who were arrested in September had been arrested before .
Perhaps one of the main reasons that these protests are still happening in Portland is that word has gotten around that nothing will happen to you if you are arrested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ left-wingers stop what they are doing when there are absolutely no consequences for bringing about this level of chaos ?
These protests have been ongoing all over the country ever since the death of George Floyd back in May .
The riots have gotten particularly out of control in Democrat-run cities like Portland , where there are virtually no consequences for this atrocious behavior .
This all serves as a grim reminder of what could happen nationally , should a Democrat be put in the White House .
This piece was written by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : Fact Check : Kamala Harris Lied About Lincoln And Supreme Court During Debate Chilling Moment Stranger Kidnaps 9 Year-Old After She Gets Off School Bus In Rhode Island Nancy Pelosi Comes Unglued After Trump Decides To End Stimulus Talks The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider .

Over the past month, police in Portland, Oregon have arrested over 200 people involved in the radically leftwing protests that have continued to overtake the city.
However, it has since been revealed that a whopping 90 percent of those who have been taken into custody have had charges dropped.
90 Percent Of Charges Dropped In Portland
The Portland Police Bureau, as well as Oregon State Police, made 213 arrests in September, according to KOIN. This was down from the 295 arrests that were made in August, which was a record for the city. In both August and September, the most common charge demonstrators were arrested on was interfering with a police officer, followed by disorderly conduct and riot.
The Multnomah County District Attorney’s Office has decided to “presumptively decline to prosecute” on all three of these charges, which is how 90 percent of those who were arrested have gotten off scot free.
RELATED: Portland Cop Drives Motorcycle Into Leftwing Rioter Blocking His Path – Her Comrades Go Wild
The district attorney’s office explained that this policy was designed to “focus limited prosecution resources on violent crimes that include property damage, assaultive behavior and actions that create a risk of injury or property destruction during a mass demonstration.”
It was reported that as of October 5, charges had been dropped in around 90% of the cases that stemmed from September’s protest activity. Nearly 10 percent of those who were arrested in September had been arrested before.
No Consequences For Violent Protests
Perhaps one of the main reasons that these protests are still happening in Portland is that word has gotten around that nothing will happen to you if you are arrested for rioting. Why would these radical left-wingers stop what they are doing when there are absolutely no consequences for bringing about this level of chaos?
These protests have been ongoing all over the country ever since the death of George Floyd back in May. The riots have gotten particularly out of control in Democrat-run cities like Portland, where there are virtually no consequences for this atrocious behavior.
This all serves as a grim reminder of what could happen nationally, should a Democrat be put in the White House.
READ NEXT: Trump-Supporting Trans Woman Infiltrates Antifa In Portland
This piece was written by James Samson on October 9, 2020. It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Fact Check: Kamala Harris Lied About Lincoln And Supreme Court During Debate
Chilling Moment Stranger Kidnaps 9 Year-Old After She Gets Off School Bus In Rhode Island
Nancy Pelosi Comes Unglued After Trump Decides To End Stimulus Talks
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Second Debate Moderator Steve Scully Posts Strange Tweet About Trump, C-SPAN Claims He Was Hacked
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-09--Second Debate Moderator Steve Scully Posts Strange Tweet About Trump, C-SPAN Claims He Was Hacked

The Twitter account of Steve Scully , the moderator for the second presidential debate , posted an eyebrow-raising tweet to Anthony Scaramucci regarding President Trump .
Scaramucci , at one time a popular supporter for the President and briefly having served as White House Communications Director , has since joined the ‘ Never Trump ’ movement , voicing his support for Biden ’ s candidacy .
“ @ Scaramucci should I respond to trump , ” he wrote .
The Scully tweet has since been deleted , prompting rampant online speculation .
Scully ’ s employer C-SPAN says that Scully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ RELATED : Chris Wallace Blames The President For Debate Disaster , Trump Responds On Twitter Why Would Debate Moderator Steve Scully Tweet at Scarmaucci About Trump ?
Scully , a political editor for C-SPAN and host of “ Washington Journal , ” already has some background that makes his impartiality leading up to the debate a major question mark .
This tweet didn ’ t help those perceptions .
Many conservatives on Twitter were perplexed by the tweet – before the claims of a hacked account came into play .
The Daily Caller @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was trying to send a personal direct message to Scaramucci , but may have erred .
Politico reporter Alex Thompson called the message an “ odd thing , ” while NewsBusters editor Curtis Houck argued , “ This is not going to help the idea that Scully is *in any way* an objective and unbiased journalist and moderator.
” Joe Concha , a reporter for The Hill , described the optics of the tweet as “ horrible , ” and somethings that “ underscore ( s ) mistrust is [ sic ] media.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scully ’ s account may have been hacked .
Fox News reports that while they claimed “ Scully ’ s Twitter account had been hacked , ” the commission “ did not give specifics on its claim.
” Former Fox News personality Megyn Kelly wasn ’ t buying that excuse asking , “ How stupid do they think we are ?
” Finally , Scully ’ s employer , C-SPAN , put out a statement in which they say Scully himself “ believes ” his account had been hacked .
RELATED : Squad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Force Biden to Implement Their Far-Left Agenda Trump Supporters Have Already Questioned Steve Scully ’ s Ability to Moderate a Debate Fairly Scully ’ s impartiality was already a concern before the Scaramucci Tweeting incident .
Scully was actually an intern for one of the debate participants – Democrat nominee Joe Biden .
He also worked for Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy .
He addressed those roles in a 2011 interview with the Cable Center .
“ I worked for Joe Biden , Senator from Delaware at the time , as an intern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to really see politics up close in Washington , D.C. , ” he noted .
“ I worked for Senator Kennedy , ” Scully continued .
“ I was involved in his ill-fated campaign in 1980 , which was interesting ; having worked as a high school student in the Carter campaign in 1976 , I saw from two different perspectives.
” Scully posted an image of he and Biden in 2016 grinning from ear to ear .
White House deputy communications director Brian Morgenstern had this to say about Scully : “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ president at this point .
And now to have a debate moderator seeking his advice – I think the cat ’ s out of the bag , ” he added .
President Trump weighed in , as well .
President Trump himself , in an interview with Sean Hannity , called Scully a “ never-Trumper , and I think somebody said he worked for Biden at one point.
” If that wasn ’ t enough , Scully also tweeted an opinion piece titled ‘ No , Not Trump , Not Ever , ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to basic standards of honesty , virtue and citizenship.
” Whether or not Scully ’ s Twitter account was hacked , as has been claimed , his expressed views on Biden and Trump make it very difficult to see how he could be impartial in any debate .

The Twitter account of Steve Scully, the moderator for the second presidential debate, posted an eyebrow-raising tweet to Anthony Scaramucci regarding President Trump.
Scaramucci, at one time a popular supporter for the President and briefly having served as White House Communications Director, has since joined the ‘Never Trump’ movement, voicing his support for Biden’s candidacy.
Scully’s account published a Tweet that caught people’s attention.
“@Scaramucci should I respond to trump,” he wrote.
Roughly 20 minutes later, Scaramucci replied:
Ignore. He is having a hard enough time. Some more bad stuff about to go down. https://t.co/cMphfQJELL — Anthony Scaramucci (@Scaramucci) October 9, 2020
The Scully tweet has since been deleted, prompting rampant online speculation.
Scully’s employer C-SPAN says that Scully claimed his Twitter account was hacked.
Interesting tweet from debate moderator Steve Scully to Anthony Scaramucci. https://t.co/3iRN9lidR6 pic.twitter.com/gImyfTCz9C — Mollie (@MZHemingway) October 9, 2020
RELATED: Chris Wallace Blames The President For Debate Disaster, Trump Responds On Twitter
Why Would Debate Moderator Steve Scully Tweet at Scarmaucci About Trump?
Scully, a political editor for C-SPAN and host of “Washington Journal,” already has some background that makes his impartiality leading up to the debate a major question mark.
This tweet didn’t help those perceptions.
Many conservatives on Twitter were perplexed by the tweet – before the claims of a hacked account came into play.
Steve Scully, the moderator for the next debate, has now deleted this tweet where he appears to be coordinating with Scaramucci and posted publicly instead of DM. pic.twitter.com/jKvGivOSHM — Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) October 9, 2020
The Daily Caller’s Greg Price speculated that Scully was trying to send a personal direct message to Scaramucci, but may have erred.
It appears that our moderator for the next debate thinks he’s dm’ing with Scaramucci but accidentally tweeted at him. I’m sure he’ll be a fair and unbiased moderator. https://t.co/gjbulY01dY — Greg Price (@greg_price11) October 9, 2020
Politico reporter Alex Thompson called the message an “odd thing,” while NewsBusters editor Curtis Houck argued, “This is not going to help the idea that Scully is *in any way* an objective and unbiased journalist and moderator.”
Joe Concha, a reporter for The Hill, described the optics of the tweet as “horrible,” and somethings that “underscore(s) mistrust is [sic] media.”
What? Why is the next presidential debate moderator publicly asking one of Trump’s staunchest critics in Anthony Scaramucci if he should respond to the president? In a related story, Scully once interned for Sen. Joe Biden. Optics here are horrible & underscore mistrust is media. https://t.co/Ipkv0CVUCA — Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) October 9, 2020
The debate commission responded by saying Scully’s account may have been hacked.
Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) co-chair Frank Fahrenkopf tells me that he was told debate moderator Steve Scully’s Twitter account was hacked but adds he has no direct knowledge. — Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) October 9, 2020
Fox News reports that while they claimed “Scully’s Twitter account had been hacked,” the commission “did not give specifics on its claim.”
Former Fox News personality Megyn Kelly wasn’t buying that excuse asking, “How stupid do they think we are?”
They can’t possibly go with this. How stupid do they think we are? https://t.co/RyMqBcYWUc — Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) October 9, 2020
Finally, Scully’s employer, C-SPAN, put out a statement in which they say Scully himself “believes” his account had been hacked.
C-SPAN official statement on Scully: pic.twitter.com/tHd2CADgNz — Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) October 9, 2020
RELATED: Squad, Progressive Group Roll Out Plan To Force Biden to Implement Their Far-Left Agenda
Trump Supporters Have Already Questioned Steve Scully’s Ability to Moderate a Debate Fairly
Scully’s impartiality was already a concern before the Scaramucci Tweeting incident.
Scully was actually an intern for one of the debate participants – Democrat nominee Joe Biden.
He also worked for Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy.
He addressed those roles in a 2011 interview with the Cable Center.
“I worked for Joe Biden, Senator from Delaware at the time, as an intern, so I had my first chance to really see politics up close in Washington, D.C.,” he noted.
“I worked for Senator Kennedy,” Scully continued. “I was involved in his ill-fated campaign in 1980, which was interesting; having worked as a high school student in the Carter campaign in 1976, I saw from two different perspectives.”
Scully posted an image of he and Biden in 2016 grinning from ear to ear.
Gotta love the @VP at the Biden Beach Bash ’16 pic.twitter.com/Z9gdC6Cmi1 — Steve Scully (@SteveScully) June 4, 2016
White House deputy communications director Brian Morgenstern had this to say about Scully:
“He is a wild-eyed critic of the president at this point. And now to have a debate moderator seeking his advice – I think the cat’s out of the bag,” he added.
“I don’t think Mr. Scully is impartial.”
President Trump weighed in, as well.
Steve Scully, the second Debate Moderator, is a Never Trumper, just like the son of the great Mike Wallace. Fix!!! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 9, 2020
President Trump himself, in an interview with Sean Hannity, called Scully a “never-Trumper, and I think somebody said he worked for Biden at one point.”
If that wasn’t enough, Scully also tweeted an opinion piece titled ‘No, Not Trump, Not Ever,’ which called the President an “affront to basic standards of honesty, virtue and citizenship.”
No, Not Trump, Not Ever https://t.co/PFvHTeQSZu — Steve Scully (@SteveScully) March 18, 2016
Whether or not Scully’s Twitter account was hacked, as has been claimed, his expressed views on Biden and Trump make it very difficult to see how he could be impartial in any debate.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-09--Democrat Legend James Carville Says Pelosi ‘Has A Point’ Regarding The 25th Amendment

On Thursday , veteran Democratic strategist and friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton , James Carville , said that something was “ really wrong ” with President Donald Trump .
The “ ragin ’ Cajun ” made his comments after agreeing with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ’ s recent announcement that she was going to explore the 25th Amendment .
The 25th Amendment , ratified in 1967 , allows for the removal of the President from power .
RELATED : What If Trump Becomes Too Ill ?
Here ’ s What Happened When Past Presidents Had Emergencies Carville : ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This Race ’ Carville made his comments on MSNBC ’ s “ All In , ” with Chris Hayes .
“ You ’ re really starting to see separation with these Republican candidates from Trump .
All along , people say when are they going to say something ?
” “ Look , he wants to arrest Barack Obama , ” Carville said .
“ You know what that ’ s going to do to Lindsey Graham ?
Do you know what that will mean , African-American turnout and South Carolina ?
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do for African-American turnout in Georgia or North Carolina ?
” “ Donald Trump is not trying to win this race , ” Carville insisted .
“ He really isn ’ t .
I have no idea who would give him money because the guy is just going all over the place on the debate , all over the place on the stimulus.
” Then Carville said Pelosi “ has a point ” regarding the recently announced 25th Amendment push , which could feasibly remove the President from office if it is determined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his constitutional duties .
Pelosi said Thursday to reporters , “ Tomorrow , by the way , tomorrow — come here tomorrow .
We ’ re going to be talking about the 25th Amendment.
” Again , the 25th Amendment specifically focuses on installing an Acting President should the current president no longer be able to perform his or her duties .
Carville said , apparently of Pelosi ’ s announcement , “ I think Speaker Pelosi has a point , that ’ s something really , really wrong with a politician who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s not trying to win.
” This move by Pelosi comes after four years of Democrats doing everything they can to overturn the results of the 2016 presidential election .
Between three years of trying to impeach President Trump on a bogus “ Russian collusion ” charge , and now exploring if he can be removed via the 25th Amendment–shouldn ’ t the Democrats now remove “ democrat ” from their party ’ s name ?
RELATED : Pelosi Suggests Using 25th Amendment To Remove Trump From Office Before Election Carville To @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ Get Rid Of All Of Them ’ Regardless , Carville encouraged Democrats to keep driving hard until November .
“ The Democrats are going to drive this home so hard , and they better not take their foot off the gas , ” Carville advised .
“ Just drive it home and get rid of all of them , ” he finished .

On Thursday, veteran Democratic strategist and friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton, James Carville, said that something was “really wrong” with President Donald Trump.
The “ragin’ Cajun” made his comments after agreeing with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s recent announcement that she was going to explore the 25th Amendment.
The 25th Amendment, ratified in 1967, allows for the removal of the President from power.
To Democrats, or anyone terrified of Trump’s re-election: We are on the precipice of winning by margins so big that progress will happen in the next 4 years. Let that hope, not fear of Trump’s re-election, be your inspiration as we head into final weeks https://t.co/gAsrENCYfo — James Carville (@JamesCarville) October 8, 2020
RELATED: What If Trump Becomes Too Ill? Here’s What Happened When Past Presidents Had Emergencies
Carville: ‘Donald Trump Is Not Trying To Win This Race’
Carville made his comments on MSNBC’s “All In,” with Chris Hayes.
“You’re really starting to see separation with these Republican candidates from Trump. All along, people say when are they going to say something?”
“Look, he wants to arrest Barack Obama,” Carville said.
“You know what that’s going to do to Lindsey Graham? Do you know what that will mean, African-American turnout and South Carolina? You know what that’s going to do for African-American turnout in Georgia or North Carolina?”
“Donald Trump is not trying to win this race,” Carville insisted.
“He really isn’t. I have no idea who would give him money because the guy is just going all over the place on the debate, all over the place on the stimulus.”
Pelosi: "We're going to be talking about the 25th Amendment." https://t.co/KgPQdDxkDG — All In with Chris Hayes (@allinwithchris) October 8, 2020
Carville Backs Pelosi Exploring 25th Amendment
Then Carville said Pelosi “has a point” regarding the recently announced 25th Amendment push, which could feasibly remove the President from office if it is determined that he is unable to carry out his constitutional duties.
Pelosi said Thursday to reporters, “Tomorrow, by the way, tomorrow — come here tomorrow. We’re going to be talking about the 25th Amendment.”
Again, the 25th Amendment specifically focuses on installing an Acting President should the current president no longer be able to perform his or her duties.
Pelosi says at her weekly press conference: "By the way, tomorrow — come here tomorrow. We're going to be talking about the 25th Amendment." 25th Amendment lays out succession if the president is incapacitated or deemed unable to carry out his duties https://t.co/Sk39EHPIL5 pic.twitter.com/qtnNc3NAD0 — CBS News (@CBSNews) October 8, 2020
Carville said, apparently of Pelosi’s announcement, “I think Speaker Pelosi has a point, that’s something really, really wrong with a politician who’s running for an election who’s not trying to win.”
This move by Pelosi comes after four years of Democrats doing everything they can to overturn the results of the 2016 presidential election.
Between three years of trying to impeach President Trump on a bogus “Russian collusion” charge, and now exploring if he can be removed via the 25th Amendment–shouldn’t the Democrats now remove “democrat” from their party’s name?
Democratic strategist James Carville on Pres. Trump's electoral strength: "He got 44.8% in 2018. He suffered the worst electoral defeat in the House ever … but yet, the media is going, 'Oh, he's so strong, he's so powerful, he's so this.' No he's not!" pic.twitter.com/YbTcNPXgjg — MSNBC (@MSNBC) February 8, 2020
RELATED: Pelosi Suggests Using 25th Amendment To Remove Trump From Office Before Election
Carville To Democrats Taking On Republicans In 2020: ‘Get Rid Of All Of Them’
Regardless, Carville encouraged Democrats to keep driving hard until November.
“The Democrats are going to drive this home so hard, and they better not take their foot off the gas,” Carville advised.
“Just drive it home and get rid of all of them,” he finished.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-09--Tucker Carlson: Kamala Harris ‘Most Secular Candidate Ever To Run’ For Vice President

After watching the first and only vice presidential debate , Fox News ’ Tucker Carlson said that despite Kamala Harris insisting she is a person of faith , the Democratic nominee “ seems like the most secular candidate ever to run.
” Analyzing Wednesday ’ s debate , Carlson observed , “ At one point , Pence pointed out that Democrats have attacked Amy Coney Barrett for the crime of being Catholic .
That seems out of bounds .
How did Harris respond ?
She responded by describing herself as a person of faith.
” Tucker : ‘ What Exactly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Power ?
’ Harris said , “ First of all , Joe Biden and I are both people of faith ” in a clip Carlson featured .
“ And it ’ s insulting to suggest that we would knock anyone for their faith , ” she added .
“ Oh , come on , ” Carlson reacted to Harris ’ comments .
“ A person of faith now ?
How ?
” “ What exactly does Kamala Harris worship , apart from power ?
, ” Carlson continued .
“ Honestly , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you know , tell us.
” Tucker Carlson : The Left Is Ruled By Identity Politics Then Carlson said , “ She seems like the most secular candidate ever to run for national office .
That ’ s not an attack on her , by the way .
Plenty of decent secular people .
But it ’ s true.
” “ Not that truth matters in this case , ” Carlson added .
“ For the purposes of last night ’ s debate , Kamala Harris identified as a ‘ person of faith @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that matters.
” Carlson then explained how the Democratic Party prioritizes identity politics .
“ The progressive Left understands race and gender and , yes , religious faith as means to an end .
They ’ re identities , ” Carlson said .
“ They don ’ t have independent meanings .
They are tools used to win arguments and achieve power.
” “ Kamala Harris cycled through various identities last night , ” Carlson added .
“ I ’ m speaking , ’ she barked again and again when Mike Pence tried @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kamala Harris was in a debate .
That ’ s what happens in a debate .
But never let the Democratic Party miss a chance to indulge in senseless identity politics .
Yet the one identity category the left despises ?
People of the Christian faith .
This is especially true of Catholics when it comes to Kamala Harris .
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich tweeted in late September , “ If President Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett , Notre Dame Law Professor , Appeals Court judge , mother of 7 ( 2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scalia , devout Catholic , it will pose a unique challenge for Kamala Harris—the most anti-Catholic bigot nominated in over a century.
” Senator Harris has already attacked a different Catholic judge .
When District Court nominee Brian Buescher was before the Senate , Harris focused on his Catholic faith .
Specifically , Buescher ’ s membership in a Catholic charitable organization , and his Christian views on the right to life .
Harris wrote that “ the Knights of Columbus , an all-male society comprised of primarily Catholic men … opposes a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Such anti-Catholic bias represents not just a discriminatory affront , but also an unconstitutional religious litmus test for appointees , ” he concluded .
According to National Review , Harris “ … went on to ask Buescher whether he was “ aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed marriage equality when [ he ] joined the organization ” and whether he had “ ever , in any way , assisted with or contributed to advocacy against women ’ s reproductive rights.
” Gingrich added in a follow-up tweet , “ Are Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by definition unfit to serve on the Supreme Court ?
If no pro-life Justice is acceptable , then no faithful Catholic , Evangelical or Orthodox Jew can be considered .
Are Democrats really prepared to alienate that many Americans ?
” Democrats are prepared to do just about anything to defeat Trump-Biden this election .
But in the end , it ’ s possible they find that constantly alienating religious Americans the worst possible move .

After watching the first and only vice presidential debate, Fox News’ Tucker Carlson said that despite Kamala Harris insisting she is a person of faith, the Democratic nominee “seems like the most secular candidate ever to run.”
Analyzing Wednesday’s debate, Carlson observed, “At one point, Pence pointed out that Democrats have attacked Amy Coney Barrett for the crime of being Catholic. That seems out of bounds. How did Harris respond? She responded by describing herself as a person of faith.”
TUCKER: Kamala Harris is a "person of faith"? How? What does she worship except for power? She's the most secular candidate ever to run for office. pic.twitter.com/NGWdAON182 — August Takala (@AugustTakala) October 9, 2020
RELATED: Tucker Exposes Democrats’ Plan To Stop Trump’s SCOTUS Pick – ‘Burn The Entire F***ing Thing Down’
Tucker: ‘What Exactly Does Kamala Harris Worship, Apart From Power?’
Harris said, “First of all, Joe Biden and I are both people of faith” in a clip Carlson featured.
“And it’s insulting to suggest that we would knock anyone for their faith,” she added.
Tucker wasn’t having it.
“Oh, come on,” Carlson reacted to Harris’ comments. “A person of faith now? How?”
“What exactly does Kamala Harris worship, apart from power?,” Carlson continued. “Honestly, we’d like to know. If you know, tell us.”
Tucker Carlson: The Left Is Ruled By Identity Politics
Then Carlson said, “She seems like the most secular candidate ever to run for national office. That’s not an attack on her, by the way. Plenty of decent secular people. But it’s true.”
“Not that truth matters in this case,” Carlson added.
“For the purposes of last night’s debate, Kamala Harris identified as a ‘person of faith,’ and that’s all that matters.”
Carlson then explained how the Democratic Party prioritizes identity politics.
“The progressive Left understands race and gender and, yes, religious faith as means to an end. They’re identities,” Carlson said.
“They don’t have independent meanings. They are tools used to win arguments and achieve power.”
“Kamala Harris cycled through various identities last night,” Carlson added. “I’m speaking,’ she barked again and again when Mike Pence tried to respond to her.”
Thanks to Kamala Harris, anti-Catholic bigotry is alive and well in the U.S. Senate https://t.co/D6xvl1WNxR #VPDebate — Trump War Room – Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) October 8, 2020
“In other words, I’m a woman,” Harris charged, “that’s why you’re interrupting me.”
Please. Kamala Harris was in a debate. That’s what happens in a debate.
But never let the Democratic Party miss a chance to indulge in senseless identity politics.
Newt Gingrich: Harris ‘Most Anti-Catholic Bigot Nominated In Over A Century’
Yet the one identity category the left despises? People of the Christian faith.
This is especially true of Catholics when it comes to Kamala Harris.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich tweeted in late September, “If President Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett, Notre Dame Law Professor, Appeals Court judge, mother of 7 (2 adopted from Haiti), clerk for Scalia, devout Catholic, it will pose a unique challenge for Kamala Harris—the most anti-Catholic bigot nominated in over a century.”
If President Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett, Notre Dame Law Professor, Appeals Court judge, mother of 7(2 adopted from Haiti), clerk for Scalia,devout Catholic it will pose a unique challenge for Kamala Harris-the most anti-Catholic bigot nominated in over a century. — Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) September 21, 2020
Senator Harris has already attacked a different Catholic judge.
When District Court nominee Brian Buescher was before the Senate, Harris focused on his Catholic faith.
Specifically, Buescher’s membership in a Catholic charitable organization, and his Christian views on the right to life.
Harris wrote that “the Knights of Columbus, an all-male society comprised of primarily Catholic men … opposes a woman’s right to choose.”
Real Clear Politics’ Steve Cortes chronicled Harris’ views:
“Anyone who ever pledged a college fraternity or sorority, take note — Harris does not seem to approve of your membership in a single-sex organization. Anyone who further dares to personally embrace longstanding Christian doctrine on the sanctity of life, including the unborn, should also seek employment outside of the federal bench.”
“Such anti-Catholic bias represents not just a discriminatory affront, but also an unconstitutional religious litmus test for appointees,” he concluded.
According to National Review, Harris “… went on to ask Buescher whether he was “aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed marriage equality when [he] joined the organization” and whether he had “ever, in any way, assisted with or contributed to advocacy against women’s reproductive rights.”
Gingrich added in a follow-up tweet, “Are Democrats prepared to say a devout Catholic is by definition unfit to serve on the Supreme Court? If no pro-life Justice is acceptable, then no faithful Catholic, Evangelical or Orthodox Jew can be considered. Are Democrats really prepared to alienate that many Americans?”
Are Democrats prepared to say a devout Catholic is by definition unfit to serve on the Supreme Court? If no pro-life Justice is acceptable then no faithful Catholic, Evangelical or Orthodox Jew can be considered. Are Democrats really prepared to alienate that many Americans? — Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) September 21, 2020
RELATED: Trump Slams ‘Anti-Catholic’ Attacks Against SCOTUS Nominee Amy Coney Barrett
Democrats are prepared to do just about anything to defeat Trump-Biden this election.
But in the end, it’s possible they find that constantly alienating religious Americans the worst possible move.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-09--If Biden Won’t Tell You Where He Stands on Packing the Supreme Court, He Doesn’t Deserve Your Vote

It is hard to imagine a serious candidate for President refusing to tell you where he stands on the future of the Supreme Court of the United States , but here we are .
On Thursday , former Vice President Joe Biden was – once again – asked whether or not he would support legislation to pack the Supreme Court with additional Justices .
Biden ’ s response was , “ You ’ ll know my position on court-packing the day after the election.
” RELATED : Biden Refuses To Reveal His Stance On Packing Supreme Court Until After Election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ On Court Packing Biden ’ s justification for refusing to tell voters where he stands on the future of the Supreme Court until he is elected is , in his own words , “ The moment I answer that question , the headline in every one of your papers will be about that rather than focusing on what ’ s happening now.
” Court-packing was attempted once before .
In 1937 , President Franklin Roosevelt proposed expanding the Supreme Court to include as many as 15 justices in response to a series of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s New Deal program were unconstitutional .
During the previous two years , the high court had struck down several key pieces of New Deal legislation on the grounds that the laws delegated an unconstitutional amount of authority to the executive branch and the federal government .
Flushed with his landslide reelection in 1936 , President Roosevelt issued a proposal in February 1937 to provide retirement at full pay for all members of the court over 70 .
If a justice refused to retire , an “ assistant ” with full voting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ensuring Roosevelt a liberal majority .
Most Republicans and many Democrats in Congress opposed the so-called “ court-packing ” plan .
Until very recently , Roosevelt ’ s court-packing effort was viewed as one of FDR ’ s most high-profile missteps and almost universally dismissed by historians and legal scholars as a terrible idea .
The current court-packing scheme is supported by liberals who once described court-packing as “ institutionally corrosive ” and “ politically unserious.
” RELATED : ‘ Woke ’ Politics Poses the First Serious Challenge To Our Constitutional Democracy Since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Reason Is Simple What was institutionally corrosive has suddenly become a cause celebre on the left for one reason : conservatives are poised to take control of the Court for a generation .
The death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to replace her poses an existential threat to liberals ’ control over their favorite and most reliable weapon : the Supreme Court .
With prominent liberals pushing for court-packing and with polling showing that 60 % of Democrats support the court-packing scheme , you would think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take a position , one way or the other , on the issue .
Biden ’ s refusal , and the refusal of his running mate Kamala Harris , to take a position on the future of the Supreme Court is not simply unacceptable .
Democrats are telling voters that the future of same-sex marriage , healthcare , abortion , and the environment all hang in the balance as a result of the vacancy on the Supreme Court .
“ You Have To Vote For Joe Biden So You Can Find Out What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doing this while their own nominee refuses to even answer the question about whether or not he would support efforts to pack the Supreme Court .
“ We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.
” It ’ s absolutely preposterous .
The American people deserve to know where a Presidential candidate stands on the future of the Supreme Court .
RELATED : Kamala Harris Didn ’ t Make One Mention Of Impeachment During Debate – But Mike Pence Did By nominating Amy Coney Barrett @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people exactly what kind of Supreme Court they would get by voting for him .
Joe Biden is refusing to do the same .
If you can ’ t tell voters where you stand on an issue as critical as this – you don ’ t deserve to be President .

It is hard to imagine a serious candidate for President refusing to tell you where he stands on the future of the Supreme Court of the United States, but here we are.
On Thursday, former Vice President Joe Biden was – once again – asked whether or not he would support legislation to pack the Supreme Court with additional Justices.
Biden’s response was, “You’ll know my position on court-packing the day after the election.”
Joe Biden Says You Have To Elect Him BEFORE He Will Admit He’ll Pack The Supreme Court pic.twitter.com/KdS0cp0dJa — The Federalist (@FDRLST) October 9, 2020
RELATED: Biden Refuses To Reveal His Stance On Packing Supreme Court Until After Election
Biden Is Trying To Hide His Views On Court Packing
Biden’s justification for refusing to tell voters where he stands on the future of the Supreme Court until after he is elected is, in his own words, “The moment I answer that question, the headline in every one of your papers will be about that rather than focusing on what’s happening now.”
Court-packing was attempted once before.
In 1937, President Franklin Roosevelt proposed expanding the Supreme Court to include as many as 15 justices in response to a series of rulings finding that certain parts of Roosevelt’s New Deal program were unconstitutional.
During the previous two years, the high court had struck down several key pieces of New Deal legislation on the grounds that the laws delegated an unconstitutional amount of authority to the executive branch and the federal government. Flushed with his landslide reelection in 1936, President Roosevelt issued a proposal in February 1937 to provide retirement at full pay for all members of the court over 70. If a justice refused to retire, an “assistant” with full voting rights was to be appointed, thus ensuring Roosevelt a liberal majority. Most Republicans and many Democrats in Congress opposed the so-called “court-packing” plan.
Until very recently, Roosevelt’s court-packing effort was viewed as one of FDR’s most high-profile missteps and almost universally dismissed by historians and legal scholars as a terrible idea.
With her pack-the-court dodge tonight, Kamala and Joe have dodged the question 10 times: pic.twitter.com/CkOCT5MZMv — John Kartch (@johnkartch) October 8, 2020
The current court-packing scheme is supported by liberals who once described court-packing as “institutionally corrosive” and “politically unserious.”
RELATED: ‘Woke’ Politics Poses the First Serious Challenge To Our Constitutional Democracy Since Communism
Why Support Court Packing Now? The Reason Is Simple
What was institutionally corrosive has suddenly become a cause celebre on the left for one reason: conservatives are poised to take control of the Court for a generation.
The death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to replace her poses an existential threat to liberals’ control over their favorite and most reliable weapon: the Supreme Court.
With prominent liberals pushing for court-packing and with polling showing that 60% of Democrats support the court-packing scheme, you would think that the Democratic nominee for President would take a position, one way or the other, on the issue.
Alas, Joe Biden refuses to.
Biden’s refusal, and the refusal of his running mate Kamala Harris, to take a position on the future of the Supreme Court is not simply unacceptable.
It is disqualifying.
This is why they wouldn’t answer the question, “will you pack the court”😉 pic.twitter.com/XJXfbnKbED — Harold Keith (@HaroldK02614531) October 8, 2020
Democrats are telling voters that the future of same-sex marriage, healthcare, abortion, and the environment all hang in the balance as a result of the vacancy on the Supreme Court.
“You Have To Vote For Joe Biden So You Can Find Out What’s In Him”
They are doing this while their own nominee refuses to even answer the question about whether or not he would support efforts to pack the Supreme Court.
Biden’s outrageous response recalls Nancy Pelosi’s now infamous line about Obamacare:
“We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”
It’s absolutely preposterous. The American people deserve to know where a Presidential candidate stands on the future of the Supreme Court.
RELATED: Kamala Harris Didn’t Make One Mention Of Impeachment During Debate – But Mike Pence Did
By nominating Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump has told the American people exactly what kind of Supreme Court they would get by voting for him.
Joe Biden is refusing to do the same.
If you can’t tell voters where you stand on an issue as critical as this – you don’t deserve to be President.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-09--Squad, Progressive Group Roll Out Plan To Force Biden to Implement Their Far-Left Agenda

The Working Families Party and all four members of the ‘ Squad ’ unveiled an agenda Thursday evening designed to push Joe Biden to the far-left should he win the presidency in November .
Known as the “ People ’ s Charter , ” the plan seeks universal health care , re-allocation of resources away from policing , canceling student debt , and advancing the tenets behind the Green New Deal .
Fox News reports that “ a number of local and federal lawmakers have signed on , including the four members of the freshman squad.
” Those four members @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) , Ayanna Pressley ( D-MA ) , Ilhan Omar ( D-MN ) , and Rashida Tlaib ( D-MI ) .
“ The vision laid out in the People ’ s Charter is exactly why we ’ re going to beat Donald Trump in November , ” Omar said in a statement .
“ Organizing people around the promise of something better – that ’ s how we ’ ll win .
And when we do , we ’ ll be ready to fulfill that promise.
” Politico writes “ the policy platform @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden to the left if he wins the presidency.
” RELATED : Trump Hits Back At Michelle Obama With ‘ World On Fire ’ Video After She Calls Him ‘ Racist ’ The plan , which seems to indicate that the Squad views Biden as little more than a vessel to implement their radical agenda , comes as signs of fracturing in the temporary alliance have become evident .
The Democrat nominee , during the presidential debate last week , distanced himself from the far-left Green New Deal .
“ The Green New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden insisted , before adding “ I don ’ t support the Green New Deal.
” Of course , Biden ’ s own campaign website , in fact , says he – at least tacitly – support the radical Green New Deal .
At this week ’ s vice presidential debate , Kamala Harris made a false claim that under their administration , fracking would not be opposed .
Both she and Biden have stated the opposite on multiple occasions .
Harris debate comments , clearly conveying a less radical environmentalist stance to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positions , caught the eye of Ocasio-Cortez .
RELATED : Bernie Sanders Predicts He ’ ll Be In Charge Of Health Care If Democrats Retake The Senate AOC Belives Biden Can Be Pushed to the Far-Left Ocasio-Cortez and the Squad have expressed confidence that she can push Biden further to the left , implementing policies such as the Green New Deal which has a price tag in the trillions .
“ What is most important is to make sure that we ensure a Democratic victory in November and that we continue to push @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to climate change to foreign policy , ” she revealed in an interview with Just the News .
Ocasio-Cortez added , “ I think , overall , we can likely push Vice President Biden in a more progressive direction across policy issues.
” Biden and Senator Bernie Sanders have published a “ unity platform ” that put forth “ a good policy blueprint that will move this country in a much-needed progressive direction.
” The move prompted Sanders to brag that he had forced Biden to adopt many of his own radical socialist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up with if implemented , will make Biden the most progressive president since FDR , ” Sanders proclaimed .
The “ People ’ s Charter ” differs little from Biden ’ s policies and platforms for when he was previously trying to earn his party ’ s nomination by bowing to the far-left extremists .
• He wants to implement the Green New Deal and supports jailing climate deniers .
• Will institute a federal “ assault weapons ” ban , with Biden vowing to put Beto O ’ Rourke in charge of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ massive disruptions to private ( health insurance ) coverage.
” One of the plan ’ s backers , Rep. Ro Khanna ( D-CA ) , believes the charter will push Biden even further left .
“ It ’ s putting a stake in the ground that we believe Joe Biden can become a New Deal 2.0 president , ” Khanna said .
Maurice “ Moe ” Mitchell , national director of the Working Families Party , believes the charter will help increase enthusiasm for radical Democrat voters not necessarily inspired by Biden .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to articulate that this election was a referendum on this agenda , ” he claimed .
In reality , Biden ’ s nomination itself was a referendum on that extreme agenda , something even Democrat voters rejected .

The Working Families Party and all four members of the ‘Squad’ unveiled an agenda Thursday evening designed to push Joe Biden to the far-left should he win the presidency in November.
Known as the “People’s Charter,” the plan seeks universal health care, re-allocation of resources away from policing, canceling student debt, and advancing the tenets behind the Green New Deal.
Fox News reports that “a number of local and federal lawmakers have signed on, including the four members of the freshman squad.”
Those four members consist of Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI).
“The vision laid out in the People’s Charter is exactly why we’re going to beat Donald Trump in November,” Omar said in a statement.
“Organizing people around the promise of something better – that’s how we’ll win. And when we do, we’ll be ready to fulfill that promise.”
Politico writes “the policy platform is part of a strategy to push Biden to the left if he wins the presidency.”
Organizing people around the promise of something better – that’s how we’ll win. The vision laid out in the People’s Charter is exactly why we’re going to beat Donald Trump in November. Join @WorkingFamilies for the launch of the #PeoplesCharter: https://t.co/F62UNMTRva — Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) October 8, 2020
RELATED: Trump Hits Back At Michelle Obama With ‘World On Fire’ Video After She Calls Him ‘Racist’
The Squad and Joe Biden – A Tenuous Radical Alliance
The plan, which seems to indicate that the Squad views Biden as little more than a vessel to implement their radical agenda, comes as signs of fracturing in the temporary alliance have become evident.
The Democrat nominee, during the presidential debate last week, distanced himself from the far-left Green New Deal.
“The Green New Deal is not my plan,” Biden insisted, before adding “I don’t support the Green New Deal.”
Joe Biden: “The Green New Deal is not my plan … No, I don’t support the Green New Deal.” #Debates2020 pic.twitter.com/Dkq8Xcdj12 — NBC News (@NBCNews) September 30, 2020
Of course, Biden’s own campaign website, in fact, says he does – at least tacitly – support the radical Green New Deal.
At this week’s vice presidential debate, Kamala Harris made a false claim that under their administration, fracking would not be opposed.
Both she and Biden have stated the opposite on multiple occasions.
“I’m in favor of banning fracking.” – Kamala Harris on video. pic.twitter.com/698djLevUw — James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) October 8, 2020
Harris debate comments, clearly conveying a less radical environmentalist stance to appeal to average American voters despite her past positions, caught the eye of Ocasio-Cortez.
“Fracking is bad, actually,” she tweeted.
Fracking is bad, actually — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) October 8, 2020
RELATED: Bernie Sanders Predicts He’ll Be In Charge Of Health Care If Democrats Retake The Senate
AOC Belives Biden Can Be Pushed to the Far-Left
Ocasio-Cortez and the Squad have expressed confidence that she can push Biden further to the left, implementing policies such as the Green New Deal which has a price tag in the trillions.
“What is most important is to make sure that we ensure a Democratic victory in November and that we continue to push Vice President Biden on issues from marijuana to climate change to foreign policy,” she revealed in an interview with Just the News.
Ocasio-Cortez added, “I think, overall, we can likely push Vice President Biden in a more progressive direction across policy issues.”
Biden and Senator Bernie Sanders have published a “unity platform” that put forth “a good policy blueprint that will move this country in a much-needed progressive direction.”
The move prompted Sanders to brag that he had forced Biden to adopt many of his own radical socialist policies.
“The compromise they came up with if implemented, will make Biden the most progressive president since FDR,” Sanders proclaimed.
Socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders brags that the policies Joe Biden has adopted “will make Biden the most progressive president since FDR”https://t.co/Ej6m1Jqv7F pic.twitter.com/R2YwLo20kX — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 9, 2020
The “People’s Charter” differs little from Biden’s policies and platforms for when he was previously trying to earn his party’s nomination by bowing to the far-left extremists.
He wants to implement the Green New Deal and supports jailing climate deniers.
Seeks free college.
Will institute a federal “assault weapons” ban, with Biden vowing to put Beto O’Rourke in charge of weapons reform.
Will cause “massive disruptions to private (health insurance) coverage.”
One of the plan’s backers, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), believes the charter will push Biden even further left.
“It’s putting a stake in the ground that we believe Joe Biden can become a New Deal 2.0 president,” Khanna said.
Maurice “Moe” Mitchell, national director of the Working Families Party, believes the charter will help increase enthusiasm for radical Democrat voters not necessarily inspired by Biden.
“It … sets up conditions postelection to articulate that this election was a referendum on this agenda,” he claimed.
In reality, Biden’s nomination itself was a referendum on that extreme agenda, something even Democrat voters rejected.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-08--Biden Refuses To Reveal His Stance On Packing Supreme Court Until After Election

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden spoke out on Thursday to say that he will not be revealing his stance on packing the Supreme Court until after the election is over .
While campaigning in the battleground state of Arizona , Biden continued to dodge questions about whether he would be in favor of packing more than nine justices on the Supreme Court .
“ You ’ ll know my opinion on court packing when the election is over , ” Biden told reporters , according to the New York Post .
He went on to nonsensically claim that he only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on this because it would become a headline .
“ I know it ’ s a great question and I don ’ t blame you for asking it , but you know the moment I answer that question , the headline in every one of your papers will be about that , other than focusing on what ’ s happening now , ” he said , seemingly referring to the COVID-19 pandemic .
“ The election has begun , ” Biden added .
“ There ’ s never been a court appointment once @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wake of the death of Ruth Bader Ginsgburg and President Donald Trump nominating Amy Coney Barrett to fill her seat , many Democrats have come out in favor of stacking the Supreme Court .
Biden , however , continues to dodge giving his opinion on this issue .
“ Four million or so people have already voted .
They ’ re denying the American people the one shot they have under constitutional law to be able to have their input , ” Biden said .
“ I will be happy to lay out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to do after that , if I ’ m the president .
If I ’ m not the president , he gets to pick it.
” Kamala Harris Dodges These Questions As Well Kamala Harris also dodged questions about packing the Supreme Court when asked her opinion on this by CNN on Tuesday .
“ We are 35 days away from an election that is probably the most important election of our lifetime and our children ’ s lifetime , ” she said .
“ There is nothing about these next 35 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for granted , and so the focus right now is on reminding people that we have this election that is very much in play.
” “ We are in the midst of an election , and the Republican leader of the Senate together with Donald Trump are , in the spirit of hypocrisy , trying to push through a nominee while the American people are voting , ” Harris added .
“ So Joe has been really clear — let ’ s focus on what ’ s happening right now , deal with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s happening right now , which is the American people are voting , ” she concluded .
“ And they should be the ones to decide who will have the next lifetime appointment to the United States Supreme Court .
Let ’ s not get distracted.
” This piece was written by James Samson on October 8 , 2020 .
It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : Ted Cruz Shuts Down Reporter Who Said He ‘ Felt Safer ’ In North Korea Than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Moment Stranger Kidnaps 9 Year-Old After She Gets Off School Bus In Rhode Island The Fake Biden Momentum Campaign Starts to Roll Out The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider .

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden spoke out on Thursday to say that he will not be revealing his stance on packing the Supreme Court until after the election is over.
Biden Dodges SCOTUS Questions
While campaigning in the battleground state of Arizona, Biden continued to dodge questions about whether he would be in favor of packing more than nine justices on the Supreme Court.
“You’ll know my opinion on court packing when the election is over,” Biden told reporters, according to the New York Post.
He went on to nonsensically claim that he only does not want to reveal his stance on this because it would become a headline.
“I know it’s a great question and I don’t blame you for asking it, but you know the moment I answer that question, the headline in every one of your papers will be about that, other than focusing on what’s happening now,” he said, seemingly referring to the COVID-19 pandemic.
“The election has begun,” Biden added. “There’s never been a court appointment once an election has begun.”
RELATED: Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court Nomination In Jeopardy As GOP Senators Test Positive
Joe Biden AGAIN refuses to say whether he supports packing the Supreme Court. "You'll know my opinion on court packing when the election is over… The moment I answer that question, the headline in every one of your papers will be about that." Give me a break. So bogus. pic.twitter.com/PQY80WEMyy — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) October 8, 2020
In the wake of the death of Ruth Bader Ginsgburg and President Donald Trump nominating Amy Coney Barrett to fill her seat, many Democrats have come out in favor of stacking the Supreme Court. Biden, however, continues to dodge giving his opinion on this issue.
“Four million or so people have already voted. They’re denying the American people the one shot they have under constitutional law to be able to have their input,” Biden said. “I will be happy to lay out in detail what what I’m going to do after that, if I’m the president. If I’m not the president, he gets to pick it.”
Kamala Harris Dodges These Questions As Well
Kamala Harris also dodged questions about packing the Supreme Court when asked her opinion on this by CNN on Tuesday.
“We are 35 days away from an election that is probably the most important election of our lifetime and our children’s lifetime,” she said. “There is nothing about these next 35 days that Joe or I will take for granted, and so the focus right now is on reminding people that we have this election that is very much in play.”
“We are in the midst of an election, and the Republican leader of the Senate together with Donald Trump are, in the spirit of hypocrisy, trying to push through a nominee while the American people are voting,” Harris added.
“So Joe has been really clear — let’s focus on what’s happening right now, deal with later, later, focus on what’s happening right now, which is the American people are voting,” she concluded. “And they should be the ones to decide who will have the next lifetime appointment to the United States Supreme Court. Let’s not get distracted.”
READ NEXT: It’s Starting: Democrats Introduce Bill To Limit Supreme Court Terms
This piece was written by James Samson on October 8, 2020. It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Ted Cruz Shuts Down Reporter Who Said He ‘Felt Safer’ In North Korea Than He Does At The White House
Chilling Moment Stranger Kidnaps 9 Year-Old After She Gets Off School Bus In Rhode Island
The Fake Biden Momentum Campaign Starts to Roll Out
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Fact Check: Kamala Harris Lied About Lincoln And Supreme Court During Debate
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-08--Fact Check: Kamala Harris Lied About Lincoln And Supreme Court During Debate

During last night ’ s vice presidential debate , Kamala Harris ( D-CA ) cited Abraham Lincoln in arguing that President Donald Trump should not have nominated Amy Coney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court seat that was vacated by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg .
Unfortunately for Harris , however , it has since been revealed that she was not being so honest about “ Honest Abe ’ s ” record in this situation .
“ In 1864… Abraham Lincoln was up for reelection , and it was 27 days before the election , and a seat became @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Abraham Lincoln ’ s party was in charge not only of the White House but the Senate , ” Harris said on the debate stage .
“ But Honest Abe said , ‘ It ’ s not the right thing to do .
The American people deserve to make the decision about who will be the next president of the United States and then that person can select who will serve for a lifetime on the highest court of our land , ' ” she added .
RELATED : Trump Says Kamala @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A ‘ Communist ’ Who Will Replace Biden ‘ Within Months ’ It has since been confirmed that Lincoln never said anything like this .
The polarization of the Supreme Court is still fairly new , basically dating back to the 1973 Roe V. Wade decision .
Before that , nominations to the Supreme Court typically proceeded as a matter of course , according to PJ Media .
Harris was telling the truth about Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney dying on October 12 , 1864 , and Lincoln not naming a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this decision had nothing to do with allowing “ the next president ” to choose the nominee .
Instead , Lincoln only delayed the decision because the Senate was not in session at the time of Taney ’ s death .
That year , the Senate session ended on the Fourth of July , and did not convene again until December .
“ It was once common for the Senate to be out of session for much of the summer and fall , ” Dan McLaughlin wrote for the National Review .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chase to fill Taney ’ s seat on the day the Senate reconvened , and he was confirmed that very day .
In fact , historian David Donald has alleged that Lincoln strategically dangled the possibility of a Supreme Court nomination in front of Chase , a former senator , governor , secretary of the Treasury , and presidential candidate , in the hopes that he would support his reelection .
It worked , as Chase did end up supporting him , and Lincoln followed through with the deal by nominating him .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ said , Lincoln did not delay his Supreme Court nomination because of some big democratic principle .
Instead , he only did so because the Senate was not in session , and he saw the opportunity to benefit himself politically by using the nomination strategically to reel in Chase .
So much for honesty , Kamala Harris .
This piece was written by James Samson on October 8 , 2020 .
It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : Ted Cruz Shuts Down Reporter Who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ North Korea Than He Does At The White House Chilling Moment Stranger Kidnaps 9 Year-Old After She Gets Off School Bus In Rhode Island The Fake Biden Momentum Campaign Starts to Roll Out The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider .

During last night’s vice presidential debate, Kamala Harris (D-CA) cited Abraham Lincoln in arguing that President Donald Trump should not have nominated Amy Coney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court seat that was vacated by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Unfortunately for Harris, however, it has since been revealed that she was not being so honest about “Honest Abe’s” record in this situation.
Harris Brings Up Lincoln
“In 1864… Abraham Lincoln was up for reelection, and it was 27 days before the election, and a seat became open on the United States Supreme Court. Abraham Lincoln’s party was in charge not only of the White House but the Senate,” Harris said on the debate stage.
“But Honest Abe said, ‘It’s not the right thing to do. The American people deserve to make the decision about who will be the next president of the United States and then that person can select who will serve for a lifetime on the highest court of our land,'” she added.
RELATED: Trump Says Kamala Harris Is A ‘Monster’ And A ‘Communist’ Who Will Replace Biden ‘Within Months’
Sen. Kamala Harris refuses to answer if Joe Biden would pack the Supreme Courthttps://t.co/9RfKCOYPDZ pic.twitter.com/zmcWNecaeA — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) October 8, 2020
Harris Was Lying
It has since been confirmed that Lincoln never said anything like this. The polarization of the Supreme Court is still fairly new, basically dating back to the 1973 Roe V. Wade decision. Before that, nominations to the Supreme Court typically proceeded as a matter of course, according to PJ Media.
Harris was telling the truth about Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney dying on October 12, 1864, and Lincoln not naming a successor until after the election. However, this decision had nothing to do with allowing “the next president” to choose the nominee.
Instead, Lincoln only delayed the decision because the Senate was not in session at the time of Taney’s death. That year, the Senate session ended on the Fourth of July, and did not convene again until December.
“It was once common for the Senate to be out of session for much of the summer and fall,” Dan McLaughlin wrote for the National Review. He added that Lincoln nominated Salmon P. Chase to fill Taney’s seat on the day the Senate reconvened, and he was confirmed that very day.
RELATED: Kamala Harris Pushes Debunked Claim That President Trump Called Coronavirus A ‘Hoax’
Lincoln Strategically Used SCOTUS Seat
In fact, historian David Donald has alleged that Lincoln strategically dangled the possibility of a Supreme Court nomination in front of Chase, a former senator, governor, secretary of the Treasury, and presidential candidate, in the hopes that he would support his reelection. It worked, as Chase did end up supporting him, and Lincoln followed through with the deal by nominating him.
This shows that contrary to what Harris said, Lincoln did not delay his Supreme Court nomination because of some big democratic principle. Instead, he only did so because the Senate was not in session, and he saw the opportunity to benefit himself politically by using the nomination strategically to reel in Chase.
So much for honesty, Kamala Harris.
This piece was written by James Samson on October 8, 2020. It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Ted Cruz Shuts Down Reporter Who Said He ‘Felt Safer’ In North Korea Than He Does At The White House
Chilling Moment Stranger Kidnaps 9 Year-Old After She Gets Off School Bus In Rhode Island
The Fake Biden Momentum Campaign Starts to Roll Out
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-10--Pelosi Slams Trump’s Pandemic Talks – ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back’

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-CA ) spoke out on Saturday to once again blast Donald Trump ’ s latest $ 1.8 trillion coronavirus relief offer as “ insufficient , ” saying that the president ’ s proposal still falls short when it comes to state and local aid , unemployment benefits and measures to fight the COVID-19 pandemic .
“ This proposal amounted to one step forward , two steps back , ” Pelosi wrote in a letter to her fellow Democratic lawmakers , according to Fox News .
However , she made sure to add that she is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about finding a help American workers and businesses that have been impacted by COVID-19 .
“ At this point , we still have disagreement on many priorities , and Democrats are awaiting language from the Administration on several provisions as the negotiations on the overall funding amount continue , ” Pelosi continued .
This came one day after Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin made his biggest offer yet to Pelosi , giving a figure between $ 1.8 and $ 1.9 trillion .
This was an increase from the White House ’ s previous offer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ included a “ reload of the Paycheck Protection Program , an employee retention tax credit , a second round of direct stimulus payments , and support for the airlines and school reopenings , ” according to Tyler Goodspeed , acting chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers .
“ We think that this was a very solid offer , and it ’ s up to the speaker to be reasonable , ” Goodspeed added .
Pelosi Reveals Her Problems With New Proposal In her letter to Democrats , however , Pelosi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problems with this proposal : • “ absence of any response on a strategic plan to crush the virus ” • $ 200 billion less than what Democrats want for expanded unemployment benefits • the inclusion of coronavirus lawsuit liability protections for businesses and not including stronger new worker safety standards • a $ 25 billion offer on child case assistance when Democrats want $ 57 billion “ At this point , the Trump proposal is insufficient in meeting families ’ needs , in stark contrast to the Heroes Act , which secured @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refundable credits , ” the Speaker wrote , referring to the $ 2.2 trillion legislation the House passed .
Lawmakers have been unable to come up with a deal for months when it comes to coronavirus aid deals .
While lawmakers like Pelosi play political games , millions of Americans continue to suffer .
READ NEXT : Nancy Pelosi Comes Unglued After Trump Decides To End Stimulus Talks This piece was written by James Samson on October 10 , 2020 .
It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kamala Harris Lied About Lincoln And Supreme Court During Debate Black Driver Lets Loose On BLM Protesters Blocking Street – ‘ I ’ m Blacker Than You !
’ Disgraced Democrat Congresswoman Gets Hollywood Makeover The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider .

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) spoke out on Saturday to once again blast Donald Trump’s latest $1.8 trillion coronavirus relief offer as “insufficient,” saying that the president’s proposal still falls short when it comes to state and local aid, unemployment benefits and measures to fight the COVID-19 pandemic.
Pelosi Pens Letter To Democrats
“This proposal amounted to one step forward, two steps back,” Pelosi wrote in a letter to her fellow Democratic lawmakers, according to Fox News.
However, she made sure to add that she is still in talks with the White House about finding a help American workers and businesses that have been impacted by COVID-19.
“At this point, we still have disagreement on many priorities, and Democrats are awaiting language from the Administration on several provisions as the negotiations on the overall funding amount continue,” Pelosi continued.
RELATED: Pelosi Announces 25th Amendment Bill To Give Commission Power To Remove President
This came one day after Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin made his biggest offer yet to Pelosi, giving a figure between $1.8 and $1.9 trillion.
This was an increase from the White House’s previous offer of $1.6 trillion, and it included a “reload of the Paycheck Protection Program, an employee retention tax credit, a second round of direct stimulus payments, and support for the airlines and school reopenings,” according to Tyler Goodspeed, acting chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.
“We think that this was a very solid offer, and it’s up to the speaker to be reasonable,” Goodspeed added.
Pelosi Reveals Her Problems With New Proposal
In her letter to Democrats, however, Pelosi laid out what she feels are the problems with this proposal:
“absence of any response on a strategic plan to crush the virus”
funding for state and local governments “remains sadly inadequate”
$200 billion less than what Democrats want for expanded unemployment benefits
the inclusion of coronavirus lawsuit liability protections for businesses and not including stronger new worker safety standards
plan doesn’t include additional refundable tax credits: Earned Income Tax Credit, Child Tax Credit and Child Dependent Care Tax Credit
a $25 billion offer on child case assistance when Democrats want $57 billion
“At this point, the Trump proposal is insufficient in meeting families’ needs, in stark contrast to the Heroes Act, which secured tens of billions for direct relief and refundable credits,” the Speaker wrote, referring to the $2.2 trillion legislation the House passed.
Lawmakers have been unable to come up with a deal for months when it comes to coronavirus aid deals. While lawmakers like Pelosi play political games, millions of Americans continue to suffer.
READ NEXT: Nancy Pelosi Comes Unglued After Trump Decides To End Stimulus Talks
This piece was written by James Samson on October 10, 2020. It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Fact Check: Kamala Harris Lied About Lincoln And Supreme Court During Debate
Black Driver Lets Loose On BLM Protesters Blocking Street – ‘I’m Blacker Than You!’
Disgraced Democrat Congresswoman Gets Hollywood Makeover
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-10--Kathy Griffin Says She Wants To ‘Watch Trump’s Rally Saturday’ To ‘See Him Croak’

The radically leftwing comedian Kathy Griffin just took her hatred for President Donald Trump to a whole new level when she said she wants to watch his rally on Saturday night just to “ see him croak.
” “ I kinda wan na watch trump ’ s rally Saturday night to see him croak , ” Griffin tweeted on Thursday to her 2.1 million followers .
Instead of apologizing to this horrendous tweet wishing death upon a sitting president , Griffin doubled down the next day , when she wrote that she was “ patiently waiting for trump ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Suspends Kathy Griffin ’ s Account For Tweet About Stabbing Trump With Syringe Full Of Air Trump Is Recovering Well From COVID Griffin will undoubtedly be unhappy to learn that Trump is actually recovering well from COVID-19 after testing positive last week .
He revealed on Friday that he is “ medication-free ” after receiving treatment for coronavirus .
“ Right now I ’ m medication free – not taking any medications as of probably eight hours , ” Trump told Fox News .
“ I am medication free , which frankly makes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t like medication.
” The president went on to say that he felt both “ really good ” and “ really , really strong.
” Trump had said on Thursday that he is feeling so much better that he is eager to resume his campaign rallies , wanting to do his first one on Saturday night .
“ I think I ’ m going to try doing a rally on Saturday night if we can — if we have enough time to put it together .
But we want to do a rally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” he told Fox News host Sean Hannity .
“ I might come back and do one in Pennsylvania in — the following night .
And it ’ s incredible what ’ s going on .
I feel so good.
” Griffin Has Launched Vile Attacks On Trump Before Of course , this is far from the first time that Griffin has wished death upon President Trump .
You might remember that back in 2017 , she posed with the severed head of Trump ’ s for a disturbing photoshoot .
Since then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the victim in that situation , whining that she had to be investigated by the Secret Service and that she was left “ unemployable and uninsurable.
” After her latest tweet , perhaps the Secret Service should pay Griffin another visit .
READ NEXT : Kathy Griffin Says She Was Reduced to ‘ Begging ’ For Roles To Distance Herself From Trump Controversy This piece was written by PopZette Staff on October 10 , 2020 .
It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : Fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And Supreme Court During Debate Black Driver Lets Loose On BLM Protesters Blocking Street – ‘ I ’ m Blacker Than You !
’ Disgraced Democrat Congresswoman Gets Hollywood Makeover The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider .

The radically leftwing comedian Kathy Griffin just took her hatred for President Donald Trump to a whole new level when she said she wants to watch his rally on Saturday night just to “see him croak.”
Pelosi Wants To Watch Trump ‘Croak’
“I kinda wanna watch trump’s rally Saturday night to see him croak,” Griffin tweeted on Thursday to her 2.1 million followers.
I kinda wanna watch trump’s rally Saturday night to see him croak. — Kathy Griffin (@kathygriffin) October 9, 2020
Instead of apologizing to this horrendous tweet wishing death upon a sitting president, Griffin doubled down the next day, when she wrote that she was “patiently waiting for trump’s coma to commence.”
RELATED: Twitter Suspends Kathy Griffin’s Account For Tweet About Stabbing Trump With Syringe Full Of Air
Patiently waiting for trump’s coma to commence. — Kathy Griffin (@kathygriffin) October 9, 2020
Trump Is Recovering Well From COVID
Griffin will undoubtedly be unhappy to learn that Trump is actually recovering well from COVID-19 after testing positive last week. He revealed on Friday that he is “medication-free” after receiving treatment for coronavirus.
“Right now I’m medication free – not taking any medications as of probably eight hours,” Trump told Fox News. “I am medication free, which frankly makes me feel good. I don’t like medication.”
The president went on to say that he felt both “really good” and “really, really strong.”
Trump had said on Thursday that he is feeling so much better that he is eager to resume his campaign rallies, wanting to do his first one on Saturday night.
“I think I’m going to try doing a rally on Saturday night if we can — if we have enough time to put it together. But we want to do a rally probably in Florida on Saturday night,” he told Fox News host Sean Hannity. “I might come back and do one in Pennsylvania in — the following night. And it’s incredible what’s going on. I feel so good.”
Griffin Has Launched Vile Attacks On Trump Before
Of course, this is far from the first time that Griffin has wished death upon President Trump. You might remember that back in 2017, she posed with the severed head of Trump’s for a disturbing photoshoot.
Since then, Griffin has somehow painted herself as the victim in that situation, whining that she had to be investigated by the Secret Service and that she was left “unemployable and uninsurable.”
After her latest tweet, perhaps the Secret Service should pay Griffin another visit.
READ NEXT: Kathy Griffin Says She Was Reduced to ‘Begging’ For Roles To Distance Herself From Trump Controversy
This piece was written by PopZette Staff on October 10, 2020. It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Fact Check: Kamala Harris Lied About Lincoln And Supreme Court During Debate
Black Driver Lets Loose On BLM Protesters Blocking Street – ‘I’m Blacker Than You!’
Disgraced Democrat Congresswoman Gets Hollywood Makeover
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Black Driver Lets Loose On BLM Protesters Blocking Street – ‘I’m Blacker Than You!’
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thepoliticalinsider--2020-10-10--Black Driver Lets Loose On BLM Protesters Blocking Street – ‘I’m Blacker Than You!’

A video is going viral today showing the moment a black motorist confronted Black Lives Matter protesters who were blocking a road in Tacoma , Washington on Thursday .
The video shows the motorist , who is wearing a red shirt , jeans , and dark baseball cap , standing next to a blue pickup truck at an intersection that the protesters seem to have blocked .
The rioters can be seen yelling at him , but he gives it right back to them .
Holding nothing back , the motorist tells the protesters that what they are doing is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lives they claim to care about so much .
“ I ’ m blacker than you !
” he screams at the rioters .
“ I ’ m blacker than you !
” One of the female protesters can comically be heard begging over and over to “ de-escalate !
” before she apparently starts fearing for her fellow rioters ’ safety and yells at the motorist to “ stop , man !
” and “ just get in your f***ing truck and go !
” RELATED : I Knew The BLM Marriage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – So Did Many Others The video continues to escalate as other black people show up to take the motorist ’ s side against the Black Lives Matter protesters .
We must warn you that there is explicit language in this video .
Black Lives Matter rioters reportedly blocked southbound Interstate 5 in Tacoma , according to the News Tribune .
They had rallied in front of Tacoma police headquarters earlier in the day , with some holding signs that referenced Manuel Ellis , a Tacoma man who died while being restrained by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ around 5:30pm , the protesters began moving down South Pine Street toward South 38th Street , and they proceeded to start blocking traffic .
A police spokeswoman stated that protesters moved onto I-5 sometime after 7 p.m .
In the video below , which also contains explicit language , the very same protesters who were arguing with the motorist can be seen standing in the freeway lanes and chanting “ Hands up !
Don ’ t shoot !
” and “ No justice , no peace !
” RELATED : Portland Cop Drives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – Her Comrades Go Wild This piece was written by James Samson on October 10 , 2020 .
It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : Fact Check : Kamala Harris Lied About Lincoln And Supreme Court During Debate Chilling Moment Stranger Kidnaps 9 Year-Old After She Gets Off School Bus In Rhode Island Disgraced Democrat Congresswoman Gets Hollywood Makeover The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider .

A video is going viral today showing the moment a black motorist confronted Black Lives Matter protesters who were blocking a road in Tacoma, Washington on Thursday.
Motorist Confronts Black Lives Matter Protesters
The video shows the motorist, who is wearing a red shirt, jeans, and dark baseball cap, standing next to a blue pickup truck at an intersection that the protesters seem to have blocked.
The rioters can be seen yelling at him, but he gives it right back to them. Holding nothing back, the motorist tells the protesters that what they are doing is having a negative impact on the black lives they claim to care about so much.
“I’m blacker than you!” he screams at the rioters. “I’m blacker than you!”
One of the female protesters can comically be heard begging over and over to “de-escalate!” before she apparently starts fearing for her fellow rioters’ safety and yells at the motorist to “stop, man!” and “just get in your f***ing truck and go!”
RELATED: I Knew The BLM Marriage With Professional Sports Was Just For Show – So Did Many Others
The video continues to escalate as other black people show up to take the motorist’s side against the Black Lives Matter protesters.
We must warn you that there is explicit language in this video.
A black man gets out of his truck to confront Black Lives Matter protesters in Tacoma who are blocking the roads. pic.twitter.com/JTj1JaKdgQ — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) October 9, 2020
Black Lives Matter Rioters Block Traffic
Black Lives Matter rioters reportedly blocked southbound Interstate 5 in Tacoma, according to the News Tribune. They had rallied in front of Tacoma police headquarters earlier in the day, with some holding signs that referenced Manuel Ellis, a Tacoma man who died while being restrained by Tacoma police back in March.
At around 5:30pm, the protesters began moving down South Pine Street toward South 38th Street, and they proceeded to start blocking traffic. A police spokeswoman stated that protesters moved onto I-5 sometime after 7 p.m.
In the video below, which also contains explicit language, the very same protesters who were arguing with the motorist can be seen standing in the freeway lanes and chanting “Hands up! Don’t shoot!” and “No justice, no peace!”
RELATED: Portland Cop Drives Motorcycle Into Leftwing Rioter Blocking His Path – Her Comrades Go Wild
This piece was written by James Samson on October 10, 2020. It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Fact Check: Kamala Harris Lied About Lincoln And Supreme Court During Debate
Chilling Moment Stranger Kidnaps 9 Year-Old After She Gets Off School Bus In Rhode Island
Disgraced Democrat Congresswoman Gets Hollywood Makeover
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.