clashdaily--2020-01-26--Satan Loves An Effeminate Church

Satan Loves An Effeminate Church

Think it ’ s normal for a Church to look like the lingerie section in Walmart ?
Guess again .
In fact , every time in history that God raised up His Church to advance His kingdom purposes , and leave His mark on society , men were right in the thick of it .
God gave us courageous , self-sacrificing , masculine men ready to take up a cause and face impossible odds .
When that spirit dries up , and men become sappy , sloppy me-monkeys , things go terribly , terribly wrong in a hurry .
Trending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Medic In Afghanistan Is A Keynote Speaker At University Check it out in today ’ s two-minute ClashRadio blast .
Did you love that ?
You bet you did !
There ’ s lots more where that came from .
Check out ClashRadio.com for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg .
Also , don ’ t miss out on this : Pussification : The Effeminization Of The American Male Doug Giles , best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog , ClashDaily.com , has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity .
That is , if the man-child will put down his frappuccino ; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome .
Buy Now : Pussification : The Effeminization Of The American Male

Think it’s normal for a Church to look like the lingerie section in Walmart? Guess again.
In fact, every time in history that God raised up His Church to advance His kingdom purposes, and leave His mark on society, men were right in the thick of it.
God gave us courageous, self-sacrificing, masculine men ready to take up a cause and face impossible odds.
When that spirit dries up, and men become sappy, sloppy me-monkeys, things go terribly, terribly wrong in a hurry.
Check it out in today’s two-minute ClashRadio blast.
Did you love that? You bet you did!
There’s lots more where that came from.
Check out ClashRadio.com for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg.
Also, don’t miss out on this:
Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now: Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male


clashdaily--2020-01-27--WaPo Suspends Reporter Over Kobe Tweets After News Of His Death — Here’s The 411

News about Kobe ’ s death in a helicopter crash sent shockwaves through social media .
But what one WaPo reporter tweeted got her suspended .
Was that the right call , or not ?
Depending on your perspective , outrage over a WaPo reporter retweeting an old headline about Kobe shortly after the tragic deaths of both him and his daughter cause WaPo to either grow a conscience or surrender to woke activists .
For anyone who was offline yesterday , Kobe Bryant and his 13-year-old daughter were in a fatal helicopter crash over the weekend .
Their deaths @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
As so often happens when a famous figure dies , people start looking back over their lives .
Some focussed on his family .
Some focused on his various areas of accomplishment since retiring from sports .
Trending : WATCH : Will Smith Has A Message About Gun Safety That Hollywood WON ’ T Love Most folks , obviously , talked about how he played the game .
But when you ’ re famous , a retrospective on your life won ’ t only focus on your accomplishments .
Scandals come up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ MeToo world we now live in , you can guess which of his scandals one WaPo reporter brought up for conversation .
Felicia Sonmez , who covers national politics for the Post , took to Twitter shortly after the world learned of Bryant ’ s death along with eight others aboard his private helicopter which crashed outside of Los Angeles .
She posted a link to an April 2016 story from the news site The Daily Beast which carried the headline : ‘ Kobe Bryant ’ s Disturbing Rape Case : The DNA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the Half-Confession.
’ …Bryant , who was 27 years old at the time , was arrested and charged with sexual assault and false imprisonment – crimes which could have landed him in prison for the rest of his life .
The accuser agreed to drop the charges on condition that Bryant issue a formal apology in court .
Bryant accepted the terms and had his lawyer read the apology .
Sonmez posted a link to an article by The Daily Beast which included details about the alleged rape , including statements @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Source : DailyMail The victim ’ s testimony was quite graphic , including details like her protesting that she needs to leave , telling him no , and crying while he proceeded with grabbing her by the throat , grabbing her chest and butt , grabbing at/rubbing her crotch with his hand for a few minutes , him removing his pants , lifting her skirt , removing her panties and ‘ coming inside ’ her .
Felica Sonmez was NOT the one to write the original stories .
She merely retweeted them .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ while the world is still reeling from the news of his death ?
Well , this might explain it : After David Klion tweeted the link to a story about this suspension with the following quote : He followed up the thread with two more posts .
These two posts give us ‘ the rest of the story ’ … Sorry , David , I don ’ t think the reaction to this story breaks neatly along ideological lines .
It ’ s more of a ‘ is now the right time to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who you are pulling the lever for in November .
Some will say that even supposing he is guilty of everything he was accused of , it ’ s cruel to his grieving family to bring it up again .
The flip side of that same coin would be that supposing he was guilty , it is cruel to the victim to see him cheered him as a national icon while the harm he did gets swept quietly under the rug .
Say the death announcement was about Bill Cosby instead of Kobe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ America ’ s Dad ’ ?
Celebrated for his ground-breaking role in Television and comedy ?
Or would he be remembered as that creepy serial rapist who passed himself off as a harmless goofball ?
Was this topic ‘ out of bounds ’ and something a WaPo reporter ( who was herself a victim of sexual assault ) should be suspended for mentioning or not ?

News about Kobe’s death in a helicopter crash sent shockwaves through social media. But what one WaPo reporter tweeted got her suspended. Was that the right call, or not?
Depending on your perspective, outrage over a WaPo reporter retweeting an old headline about Kobe shortly after the tragic deaths of both him and his daughter cause WaPo to either grow a conscience or surrender to woke activists.
For anyone who was offline yesterday, Kobe Bryant and his 13-year-old daughter were in a fatal helicopter crash over the weekend. Their deaths hit onlookers on social media particularly hard.
As so often happens when a famous figure dies, people start looking back over their lives. Some focussed on his family. Some focused on his various areas of accomplishment since retiring from sports.
Most folks, obviously, talked about how he played the game.
But when you’re famous, a retrospective on your life won’t only focus on your accomplishments. Scandals come up, too.
And, in this MeToo world we now live in, you can guess which of his scandals one WaPo reporter brought up for conversation.
Felicia Sonmez, who covers national politics for the Post, took to Twitter shortly after the world learned of Bryant’s death along with eight others aboard his private helicopter which crashed outside of Los Angeles. She posted a link to an April 2016 story from the news site The Daily Beast which carried the headline: ‘Kobe Bryant’s Disturbing Rape Case: The DNA Evidence, the Accuser’s Story, and the Half-Confession.’ …Bryant, who was 27 years old at the time, was arrested and charged with sexual assault and false imprisonment – crimes which could have landed him in prison for the rest of his life. The accuser agreed to drop the charges on condition that Bryant issue a formal apology in court. Bryant accepted the terms and had his lawyer read the apology. Sonmez posted a link to an article by The Daily Beast which included details about the alleged rape, including statements to police made by the accuser.
Source: DailyMail
The victim’s testimony was quite graphic, including details like her protesting that she needs to leave, telling him no, and crying while he proceeded with grabbing her by the throat, grabbing her chest and butt, grabbing at/rubbing her crotch with his hand for a few minutes, him removing his pants, lifting her skirt, removing her panties and ‘coming inside’ her.
A detective testified in a preliminary hearing that the accuser underwent an examination at a local hospital. ‘[The nurse] stated that there were several lacerations to the victim’s posterior fourchette or vaginal area, and two of those lacerations were approximately one centimeter in length,’ testified Detective Doug Winters of the Eagle County Sheriff’s Office. ‘And there were many, I believe, 2 millimeter lacerations. Too many to count… ‘[The nurse] stated that the injuries were consistent with penetrating genital trauma. ‘That it’s not consistent with consensual sex.’
Source: DailyMail
Felica Sonmez was NOT the one to write the original stories. She merely retweeted them.
Why would she do such a thing while the world is still reeling from the news of his death? Well, this might explain it:
After David Klion tweeted the link to a story about this suspension with the following quote:
“It’s outrageous and cowardly that the Washington Post is suspending a reporter for tweeting factual, reported information about a public figure who was credibly accused of rape.”
He followed up the thread with two more posts. These two posts give us ‘the rest of the story’…
NYT and the Atlantic will do nothing to their employees who smear a reporter (relying on a debunked report by their friend) on Twitter; meanwhile WaPo will suspend that same reporter for tweeting facts about Kobe Bryant and setting off the MAGA crowd. It's sickening. — David Klion? (@DavidKlion) January 27, 2020
Sorry, David, I don’t think the reaction to this story breaks neatly along ideological lines. It’s more of a ‘is now the right time to talk about this’ question… regardless of who you are pulling the lever for in November.
Some will say that even supposing he is guilty of everything he was accused of, it’s cruel to his grieving family to bring it up again.
The flip side of that same coin would be that supposing he was guilty, it is cruel to the victim to see him cheered him as a national icon while the harm he did gets swept quietly under the rug.
Say the death announcement was about Bill Cosby instead of Kobe. Would he have been fêted as ‘America’s Dad’? Celebrated for his ground-breaking role in Television and comedy? Or would he be remembered as that creepy serial rapist who passed himself off as a harmless goofball?
Was this topic ‘out of bounds’ and something a WaPo reporter (who was herself a victim of sexual assault) should be suspended for mentioning or not?


clashdaily--2020-01-27--WATCH: Trump Team Releases New Pro-America Video… Do You Love This Message?

“ For too long , a small group in our nation ’ s capital has reaped the rewards of government , while the people have borne the cost .
The Forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer.
” “ What truly matters , is not which party controls our government , but if our government is controlled by the people.
” How does the message in this video , one of energy and optimism , compare and contrast to the grim warnings and heckling we hear on the other side ?
Is this the sort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A message that , to use the old cliché , ‘ moves and inspires ’ you ?
Here are some more of the quotes you can find inside : “ We will face challenges .
We will confront hardships , but we will get the job done.
” The Bumper sticker ‘ America First ’ is now taken beyond just a slogan and expressed as a quantifiable strategy : “ Every decision on trade , on taxes , on immigration , on foreign affairs will be made to benefit American workers and American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the ravages of other countries making our products , stealing our companies and destroying our jobs .
America will start winning again.
” What is the foundational principle ?
“ At the bedrock of our policies , will be a total allegiance to the United States of America .
And through our loyalty to our country , we will rediscover our loyalty to each other .
We must speak our minds openly , debate our disagreements honestly , but always pursue solidarity .
Do not allow anyone to tell you it can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meet the heart and fight and spirit of America.
” Sounds like a soaring view of a great and unified people , stepping up to their full potential as a great nation in the world , doesn ’ t it ?
Sort of like a ‘ shining city on a hill ’ , isn ’ t it ?
Who was it that used to talk like that ?
And how did he do in his reelection bid ?
It ’ s not time to take our foot off the gas , by any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of things to come , let ’ s just say I like our chances .
What do you think ?
We ’ ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with a less than stellar past , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

“For too long, a small group in our nation’s capital has reaped the rewards of government, while the people have borne the cost. The Forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer.”
“What truly matters, is not which party controls our government, but if our government is controlled by the people.”
How does the message in this video, one of energy and optimism, compare and contrast to the grim warnings and heckling we hear on the other side?
Is this the sort of message that stirs your blood? A message that, to use the old cliché, ‘moves and inspires’ you?
Here are some more of the quotes you can find inside:
“We will face challenges. We will confront hardships, but we will get the job done.”
The Bumper sticker ‘America First’ is now taken beyond just a slogan and expressed as a quantifiable strategy:
“Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs will be made to benefit American workers and American families. We must protect our borders from the ravages of other countries making our products, stealing our companies and destroying our jobs. America will start winning again.”
What is the foundational principle?
“At the bedrock of our policies, will be a total allegiance to the United States of America. And through our loyalty to our country, we will rediscover our loyalty to each other.
We must speak our minds openly, debate our disagreements honestly, but always pursue solidarity. Do not allow anyone to tell you it cannot be done. No challenge can meet the heart and fight and spirit of America.”
Sounds like a soaring view of a great and unified people, stepping up to their full potential as a great nation in the world, doesn’t it?
Sort of like a ‘shining city on a hill’, isn’t it?
Who was it that used to talk like that? And how did he do in his reelection bid?
It’s not time to take our foot off the gas, by any means. But if this any indication of things to come, let’s just say I like our chances.
What do you think?
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-01-27--FBI Is Looking Into Whether Ilhan Married Her Brother … Will ICE Get The Last Laugh?

FBI agents sat for hours with someone who handed over a ‘ trove ’ of documents alleging Ilhan committed marriage fraud , a serious felony .
For a ‘ freshman ’ Congresswoman who spends most of her time pointing a finger of blame at other people , when she isn ’ t railing about how horrible American institutions are , and against ICE , this could get awkward for both her and her party .
How would it really reflect on the Democrats if it turns out that the America-hating antisemitic chick , soft on terrorist regimes , who has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Quatar and Iran ’ , has also committed immigration fraud ?
Trending : WATCH : Will Smith Has A Message About Gun Safety That Hollywood WON ’ T Love Is now a bad time to point out that she ’ s sitting on a Foreign Affairs committee with all the security clearances that go with it ?
Isn ’ t the central accusation in their Impeachment mantra , the danger it poses to National Security ?
It ’ s not like any of these accusations are coming out of the blue .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact , she is hardly the only squad member to have had red flags raised about her compliance with US law .
The Federal Bureau of Investigation is reviewing claims Rep. Ilhan Omar married her brother , The Post has learned .
Two FBI agents held an hours-long meeting in Minnesota in mid-October with a concerned party who handed over a trove of documents regarding Omar ’ s 2009 marriage to Ahmed Nur Said Elmi , a source with knowledge of the event said .
At the meeting , first reported by website @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Somali-born Democrat married Elmi , a British citizen rumored to be her brother , so he could obtain a green card and study in America , the source said .
Source : NYPost Rep Steve King was pulled from all committee work after something he said in an interview that was deemed offensive .
But the Democrats can ’ t even bring themselves to call out Ilhan Omar by name for any of the long list of things she ’ s said and done since getting elected .
But we ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outrage seriously when they sharpen their pointing-fingers and stick them in the face of their rivals , right ?
If Democrats care so deeply about ‘ national security ’ , how about they start by pulling her off of any committee work until they have looked into these ‘ asset of Quatar ’ allegations by the Immam of Peace who claims to have corroborating evidence .
Isn ’ t that the sort of thing the Intelligence Committee was actually formed to look into , rather than highjacking the legitimate responsibilities of the Judicial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many OTHER security matters have been put on the back burner so that Schiff could tilt at windmills in his little impeachment party ?
• Was Ilhan Omar Married To Her BROTHER ?
– New Docs Shed Light On This SCANDAL • Corroboration : 2nd Witness Testifies To Ilhan Omar Being Asset For Qatar & Iran • Should Ilhan Omar ’ s Support For This Terrorist Organization Disqualify Her From Committee Work ?
• Ilhan Omar Confronted Over Terror Stats In Home District And Bravely Runs Away

FBI agents sat for hours with someone who handed over a ‘trove’ of documents alleging Ilhan committed marriage fraud, a serious felony.
The two agents said they would share the information with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the US Department of Education, but did not commit to opening an investigation into the firebrand lawmaker, the source said.
Source: NYPost
For a ‘freshman’ Congresswoman who spends most of her time pointing a finger of blame at other people, when she isn’t railing about how horrible American institutions are, and against ICE, this could get awkward for both her and her party.
How would it really reflect on the Democrats if it turns out that the America-hating antisemitic chick, soft on terrorist regimes, who has been accused of ‘being an Asset for Quatar and Iran’, has also committed immigration fraud?
Is now a bad time to point out that she’s sitting on a Foreign Affairs committee with all the security clearances that go with it?
Isn’t the central accusation in their Impeachment mantra, the danger it poses to National Security? It’s not like any of these accusations are coming out of the blue. They’re adding up.
In fact, she is hardly the only squad member to have had red flags raised about her compliance with US law.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation is reviewing claims Rep. Ilhan Omar married her brother, The Post has learned. Two FBI agents held an hours-long meeting in Minnesota in mid-October with a concerned party who handed over a trove of documents regarding Omar’s 2009 marriage to Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, a source with knowledge of the event said. At the meeting, first reported by website The Blaze, the agents discussed concerns the Somali-born Democrat married Elmi, a British citizen rumored to be her brother, so he could obtain a green card and study in America, the source said.
Source: NYPost
Rep Steve King was pulled from all committee work after something he said in an interview that was deemed offensive.
But the Democrats can’t even bring themselves to call out Ilhan Omar by name for any of the long list of things she’s said and done since getting elected.
But we’re all supposed to take Democrats’ moral outrage seriously when they sharpen their pointing-fingers and stick them in the face of their rivals, right?
If Democrats care so deeply about ‘national security’, how about they start by pulling her off of any committee work until they have looked into these ‘asset of Quatar’ allegations by the Immam of Peace who claims to have corroborating evidence.
Isn’t that the sort of thing the Intelligence Committee was actually formed to look into, rather than highjacking the legitimate responsibilities of the Judicial Committee to oversee impeachment proceedings?
How many OTHER security matters have been put on the back burner so that Schiff could tilt at windmills in his little impeachment party?
Related Stories…


Auschwitz

This week marks the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz , the most notorious of all the concentration camps .
It consisted of Auschwitz I ( the main camp located in Oswiecim ) , Auschwitz II-Birkenau ( which was both a concentration and extermination camp ) , Auschwitz III-Monowitz ( a labor camp established in order to provide staff for a factory owned by the chemical conglomerate IG Farben ) , and dozens of subcamps .
Originally a camp for Polish political prisoners , its inmates would eventually consist of Jews , Soviet prisoners of war , Gypsies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hoss from May 1940 to January 27 , 1945 , Auschwitz held at least 1.3 million inmates , of which 1.1 million would perish .
Most of the inmates at Auschwitz died in the gas chambers .
The other inmates were either shot or beaten to death , while others died of starvation , exhaustion , disease , or from being subject to medical experiments .
Although medical experiments were carried out at other concentration camps , those done at Auschwitz were the most infamous , especially if they were conducted by Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Death .
Mengele believed that such experiments were the key to unlocking the secrets of genetics , and in order to so , twins became the ideal ( and hence most frequently used ) guinea pigs for his experiments .
These experiments consisted of injections ( either with various substances or pathogens ) , unnecessary surgery , body probes , taking blood samples , and attempts to change the eye color of various inmates via injection or eye drops .
In addition to his experiments , Mengele had to tend to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in not healing but death for the inmates .
According to an inmate who had been transferred from Treblinka , Mengele would approach those who were ill and ask them how they wanted to die .
Most of them were sent to the gas chambers .
Trending : WATCH : Will Smith Has A Message About Gun Safety That Hollywood WON ’ T Love Mengele was also involved in the selection process for the newly arrived inmates , thus deciding who would live and who would die .
Mengele also decided to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
When it was Yom Kippur Day , Mengele ( referring to a Jewish prayer stating that on the day of judgment the flock would pass underneath the rod of the shepherd who then decided which sheep would live ) had one of the camp ’ s guards attach a piece of wood to a goal post , and then had a group of two thousand Jewish boys walk underneath it .
Those whose heads touched the level of the marker would die , and those whose heads didn ’ t would live @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mengele tried to complete as much research as possible before trying to escape .
Not only was he worried about being captured , but also because he feared his research would wind up in Soviet hands .
Mengele managed to flee to South America , where he died in 1979 .
Auschwitz was liberated on January 27 , 1945 , thus ending the horror for the surviving inmates .
Hoss and various other SS personnel stationed there were brought to justice , and most of whom were executed for their crimes .
Auschwitz @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the day of its liberation became International Holocaust Remembrance Day .
Thus , those who died in the Holocaust , as well as those who survived , should be remembered .

This week marks the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, the most notorious of all the concentration camps. It consisted of Auschwitz I (the main camp located in Oswiecim), Auschwitz II-Birkenau (which was both a concentration and extermination camp), Auschwitz III-Monowitz (a labor camp established in order to provide staff for a factory owned by the chemical conglomerate IG Farben), and dozens of subcamps. Originally a camp for Polish political prisoners, its inmates would eventually consist of Jews, Soviet prisoners of war, Gypsies, and other Europeans. Commanded by Rudolph Hoss from May 1940 to January 27, 1945, Auschwitz held at least 1.3 million inmates, of which 1.1
million would perish.
Most of the inmates at Auschwitz died in the gas chambers. The other inmates were either shot or beaten to death, while others died of starvation, exhaustion, disease, or from being subject to medical experiments.
Although medical experiments were carried out at other concentration camps, those done at Auschwitz were the most infamous, especially if they were conducted by Dr. Josef Mengele, a.k.a. the Angel of Death. Mengele believed that such experiments were the key to unlocking the secrets of genetics, and in order to so, twins became the ideal (and hence most frequently used) guinea pigs for his experiments. These experiments consisted of injections (either with various substances or pathogens), unnecessary surgery, body probes, taking blood samples, and attempts to change the eye color of various inmates via injection or eye drops.
In addition to his experiments, Mengele had to tend to the sick, a task that would result in not healing but death for the inmates. According to an inmate who had been transferred from Treblinka, Mengele would approach those who were ill and ask them how they wanted to die. Most of them were sent to the gas chambers.
Mengele was also involved in the selection process for the newly arrived inmates, thus deciding who would live and who would die. Mengele also decided to be the God of the Jews at Auschwitz. When it was Yom Kippur Day, Mengele (referring to a Jewish prayer stating that on the day of judgment the flock would pass underneath the rod of the shepherd who then decided which sheep would live) had one of the camp’s guards attach a piece of wood to a goal post, and then had a group of two thousand Jewish boys walk underneath it. Those whose heads touched the level of the marker would die, and those whose heads didn’t would live.
As the Soviets approached Auschwitz, Mengele tried to complete as much research as possible before trying to escape. Not only was he worried about being captured, but also because he feared his research would wind up in Soviet hands. Mengele managed to flee to South America, where he died in 1979.
Auschwitz was liberated on January 27, 1945, thus ending the horror for the surviving inmates. Hoss and various other SS personnel stationed there were brought to justice, and most of whom were executed for their crimes.
Auschwitz is a main symbol of the Holocaust, and the day of its liberation became International Holocaust Remembrance Day.
Thus, those who died in the Holocaust, as well as those who survived, should be remembered.


clashdaily--2020-01-27--Goodbye Sammy, Our Patriot Greyhound

Goodbye Sammy, Our Patriot Greyhound

Sadly , my wife Mary and I had to euthanize Sammy , our beloved 15-and-a-half-year-old greyhound .
Due to his unusually large size , his former owner named him Samson .
We called him Sammy .
After Rush , our border collie and Puppy , our cocker spaniel died of old age , Mary said her next dog would be small enough to carry in her purse .
Around 13 years ago , I was sitting on my sofa watching NFL football when I felt a presence in the room .
Upon turning around , I was face to face @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on his broken hind leg .
A vendor at the convention Mary attended was looking for homes for greyhounds who were retired from racing .
If not adopted , the beautiful dogs could be euthanized .
So much for Mary ’ s plan for a dog to fit into her purse .
Trending : WATCH : Will Smith Has A Message About Gun Safety That Hollywood WON ’ T Love I believe our pets come to us via divine assignment .
Every pet we have had came to us through unexpected circumstances .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ people and socializing with other dogs .
He would never fight another dog unless in self-defense .
I like to think of Sammy as our patriot dog because of what he endured for our country .
For several years , Mary and I spent a large amount of time traveling the country with the Tea Party and the Conservative Campaign Committee .
We were working to elect conservatives in house and senate races .
We also worked to elect President Trump .
For a while , Sammy was home alone with a pet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feed and walk him .
The sitter reported to us that she thought Sammy was sad and lonely .
We found Ms Sue , a great new pet sitter .
She would move into our home whenever we left town on another campaign adventure to save America from socialist/progressive anti-American Democrats .
Sammy loved Ms Sue .
Sammy always greeted us with great excitement every time we returned home .
After Ms Sue began staying with him in our absence , Sammy did not even raise his head from his bed or look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the front door .
That was annoying .
Had this wicked woman stolen my dog ’ s affection ?
Just kidding .
Old age caused Sammy to lose mobility and control of his body .
Though it pained her deeply , Mary knew it was time to let Sammy go .
The veterinarian was wonderful , making Sammy ’ s passing painless and peaceful .
He said it was rare for such a large greyhound to live 15 and a half years .
Mary always fed Sammy bones and raw meat which is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Sammy ’ s time home alone without us contributed to Republicans winning the senate and Trump winning the White House .
Mary and I went to lunch to celebrate the life of Sammy , our patriot greyhound .

Sadly, my wife Mary and I had to euthanize Sammy, our beloved 15-and-a-half-year-old greyhound. Due to his unusually large size, his former owner named him Samson. We called him Sammy.
After Rush, our border collie and Puppy, our cocker spaniel died of old age, Mary said her next dog would be small enough to carry in her purse.
Around 13 years ago, I was sitting on my sofa watching NFL football when I felt a presence in the room. Upon turning around, I was face to face with a huge dog with a cast on his broken hind leg.
A vendor at the convention Mary attended was looking for homes for greyhounds who were retired from racing. If not adopted, the beautiful dogs could be euthanized. So much for Mary’s plan for a dog to fit into her purse.
I believe our pets come to us via divine assignment. Every pet we have had came to us through unexpected circumstances.
Sammy was a gentle giant who loved people and socializing with other dogs. He would never fight another dog unless in self-defense.
I like to think of Sammy as our patriot dog because of what he endured for our country. For several years, Mary and I spent a large amount of time traveling the country with the Tea Party and the Conservative Campaign Committee. We were working to elect conservatives in house and senate races. We also worked to elect President Trump.
For a while, Sammy was home alone with a pet sitter stopping in twice a day to feed and walk him. The sitter reported to us that she thought Sammy was sad and lonely.
We found Ms Sue, a great new pet sitter. She would move into our home whenever we left town on another campaign adventure to save America from socialist/progressive anti-American Democrats. Sammy loved Ms Sue.
Sammy always greeted us with great excitement every time we returned home. After Ms Sue began staying with him in our absence, Sammy did not even raise his head from his bed or look in our direction when we came through the front door. That was annoying.
Had this wicked woman stolen my dog’s affection? Just kidding.
Old age caused Sammy to lose mobility and control of his body. Though it pained her deeply, Mary knew it was time to let Sammy go.
The veterinarian was wonderful, making Sammy’s passing painless and peaceful. He said it was rare for such a large greyhound to live 15 and a half years. Mary always fed Sammy bones and raw meat which is called BARF.
In a small way, Sammy’s time home alone without us contributed to Republicans winning the senate and Trump winning the White House. Mary and I went to lunch to celebrate the life of Sammy, our patriot greyhound.
Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American
Help Lloyd spread the Truth
http://LloydMarcus.com


clashdaily--2020-01-27--WATCH: John Voight Calls Impeachment ‘A Crime’ Attacking American Success

Not everyone in Hollywood defaults to the same contempt for the nation we ’ re so used to hearing .
John Voight is a top-tier name who is also about as conservative as they get .
Here ’ s John Voight with a few things on his mind that he thinks America needs to hear .
He ’ s concerned that too many Americans have forgotten what it is that those who fought for Independence left as a legacy to the generations that follow .
Trending : WATCH : Trump Team Releases New Pro-America Video… Do You Love This Message @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as follows : Let us stand among the greatest statues that stand on the White House grounds , where truths were spoken long ago by our forefathers .
Let us remember what this house stands for , this White House .
It stands for trust , and stands for moral obligation .
It stands for safety of the United States of America .
Now listen here my fellow Americans of the USA , the President is in much danger from this radical left-wing group .
I say radical because this group as only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truths that have been written .
The truth , my friends , the truth that holds the greatest scripture , that is the Declaration of Independence .
We as a nation have gained this back with President Trump , and what does the Left want to do ?
To knock down a nation of God ’ s glory .
This is a disgrace to mankind and a disgrace to the people of the United States of America .
This is a crime .
An impeachment to take down a nation ’ s success @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disgusting lies against our President Trump who held to his promise for our country , his word for our country ’ s love .
We call upon our highest prayers , and ask Jesus , Moses , and all saints to save the truth that has been taken down by these cruel individuals of the left , and ask God to place his hands upon this nation of the United States of America and bless and protect the truth for our President Donald Trump so he can continue his legacy as one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

Not everyone in Hollywood defaults to the same contempt for the nation we’re so used to hearing. John Voight is a top-tier name who is also about as conservative as they get.
Here’s John Voight with a few things on his mind that he thinks America needs to hear.
He’s concerned that too many Americans have forgotten what it is that those who fought for Independence left as a legacy to the generations that follow.
"This is a disgrace to mankind and a disgrace to the people of the United States of America. This is a crime: an impeachment to take down a nation's success." @JonVoight pic.twitter.com/20oEsqa20V — Dan Scavino (@DanScavino) January 25, 2020
The text of his message is as follows:
Let us stand among the greatest statues that stand on the White House grounds, where truths were spoken long ago by our forefathers. Let us remember what this house stands for, this White House. It stands for trust, and stands for moral obligation. It stands for safety of the United States of America. Now listen here my fellow Americans of the USA, the President is in much danger from this radical left-wing group. I say radical because this group as only filthy lies and distortion of the mighty truths that have been written. The truth, my friends, the truth that holds the greatest scripture, that is the Declaration of Independence. We as a nation have gained this back with President Trump, and what does the Left want to do? To knock down a nation of God’s glory. This is a disgrace to mankind and a disgrace to the people of the United States of America. This is a crime. An impeachment to take down a nation’s success. For their control of deceit and disgusting lies against our President Trump who held to his promise for our country, his word for our country’s love. We call upon our highest prayers, and ask Jesus, Moses, and all saints to save the truth that has been taken down by these cruel individuals of the left, and ask God to place his hands upon this nation of the United States of America and bless and protect the truth for our President Donald Trump so he can continue his legacy as one of our greatest presidents. God bless.
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-01-27--Joy Villa’s Pro-Trump Grammy Dress Has A Special Message For Democrats Pushing Impeachment…

This singer isn ’ t shy about stating her support for President Trump among the leftists in the music world .
For the past several years , Joy Villa has been using the red carpet as a way to spread her MAGA message .
In 2017 , she wore a blue “ Make America Great Again ” dress , in 2018 , it was a pro-life message with an image of a baby in the womb , and in 2019 , it was a “ Build the Wall ” dress with a red MAGA purse .
Villa often has her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her photograph taken has a “ big reveal ” as she tosses off the cloak or coat covering the gown .
This year she arrived in a full-length white coat which she unbuttoned to reveal a red gown with “ Trump ” written down the front in capital letters and 2020 along the bottom .
When she turned , she revealed that the back of her dress had the words “ Impeached & Re-Elected.
” Villa accessorized with a small black purse with the GOP logo on it .
Trending : WATCH : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You Love This Message ?
Her message was clear — they can keep on going with the partisan impeachment , but it isn ’ t going to make a difference in November .
Villa says that she contacts the White House and Ivanka Trump that she ’ s planning on a “ supportive ” message but keeps the details a secret .
‘ I just told Ivanka and the White House that I ’ m going to wear something to be supportive , ’ she told THR.com .
‘ I don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Villa told the outlet that she did the stunt in partnership with ViralPAC , an organization that funds conservative artists to support Trump ’ s re-election in 2020 .
Here is the big reveal : Villa wasn ’ t the only one with a pro-Trump message .
Ricky Rebel had a very “ cheeky ” message when he revealed his red patent leather chaps on the red carpet : Yes , we all think that the impeachment thing is filled with asses , but we really didn ’ t need to see that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rebel had a more tasteful ( yet equally flashy ) look with a “ Keep America Great ” dinner jacket .
In a venue where everyone else is pushing their leftist bona fides it ’ s something to see some pushback by a couple of folks who are walking the same red carpet .

This singer isn’t shy about stating her support for President Trump among the leftists in the music world.
For the past several years, Joy Villa has been using the red carpet as a way to spread her MAGA message. In 2017, she wore a blue “Make America Great Again” dress, in 2018, it was a pro-life message with an image of a baby in the womb, and in 2019, it was a “Build the Wall” dress with a red MAGA purse.
Villa often has her dress hidden and as she is having her photograph taken has a “big reveal” as she tosses off the cloak or coat covering the gown.
This year she arrived in a full-length white coat which she unbuttoned to reveal a red gown with “Trump” written down the front in capital letters and 2020 along the bottom. When she turned, she revealed that the back of her dress had the words “Impeached & Re-Elected.” Villa accessorized with a small black purse with the GOP logo on it.
Her message was clear — they can keep on going with the partisan impeachment, but it isn’t going to make a difference in November.
Villa says that she contacts the White House and Ivanka Trump that she’s planning on a “supportive” message but keeps the details a secret.
‘I just told Ivanka and the White House that I’m going to wear something to be supportive,’ she told THR.com. ‘I don’t let anyone know the message beforehand.’ Villa told the outlet that she did the stunt in partnership with ViralPAC, an organization that funds conservative artists to support Trump’s re-election in 2020. Source: Daily Mail
Here is the big reveal:

Villa wasn’t the only one with a pro-Trump message.
Ricky Rebel had a very “cheeky” message when he revealed his red patent leather chaps on the red carpet:
Yes, we all think that the impeachment thing is filled with asses, but we really didn’t need to see that in that way.
Last year, Rebel had a more tasteful (yet equally flashy) look with a “Keep America Great” dinner jacket.
In a venue where everyone else is pushing their leftist bona fides it’s something to see some pushback by a couple of folks who are walking the same red carpet.


clashdaily--2020-01-27--Is The NYT ‘Breaking News’ About The Bolton Book Just Impeachment ‘Kavanaugh-ing’?

The Partisan Press loves to leak a story when it can do maximum damage to anyone and anything that stands in the way of Democrat objectives… was this ‘ leak ’ another coordinated hit ?
Bolton and his book are in the news , with a salacious news ‘ revelation ’ about Ukraine just in time for the Senate Impeachment hearings .
Is it a coincidence ?
Or is this the Kavanaugh strategy all over again ?
The same press that will dismiss very specific and documented questions about conflicts of interest involving Democrats like Biden as ‘ debunked ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have zero objections to running with unverified ( and later debunked ) stories like Julie Swetnick ’ s allegations against Kavanaugh and the now-disproven Russian Collusion story .
Trending : WATCH : Trump Team Releases New Pro-America Video… Do You Love This Message ?
In fact , the NYT and WaPo earned themselves Pulitzer Prizes over what literally proved to be a bogus story critical of the President .
So , what about this new Bolton story that already has the squishy Republican Senators chomping at the bit to call Bolton as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ team burned much of Schiff ’ s case to the ground in two short hours of rebuttal , the New York Times rushed to the rescue of the Impeachment project .
Here is how NYTimes pitched their story : Even Brit Hume is calling BS here : That ’ s the first reaction of Mr. ‘ Fair and Balanced ’ himself , Brit Hume .
He DOES admit it ’ s a big story .
But clearly the timing looks suspicious , even to him .
It ’ s easy to say this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of opportunism .
There are several competing explanations for what ’ s REALLY happening here : Here are the top contenders .
Explanation # 1 ) NYTimes got a tip from some random ‘ resister ’ who caught wind of this story , and the accuracy is every bit as uncertain as that of the supposed ‘ whistleblower ’ himself , whose story , as it turns out , did not align with the transcript .
This explanation has the benefit of Occam ’ s Razor level simplicity .
It takes only one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NYTimes was cooperating with someone on the inside of the Deep State , working ( whether directly or indirectly ) in concert with the cabal aligned with Schiff to take down Trump .
One might point to the GAO report that ‘ conveniently ’ released their report damaging to Trump on the very first day of the Senate hearings , with bold claims that Trump ‘ broke the law ’ while just as conveniently failing to mention that Obama , by that same standard , had done so at least seven times .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If this WAS Vindman ’ s handiwork , he ’ d best be VERY certain that he hasn ’ t stumbled into a Canary trap .
Or it just might be himself he ’ s hurting most .
Explanation # 3 ) Bolton , or someone on his team , is creating buzz to sell his book .
A question has been raised the answer to which can not be found anywhere other than within the pages of his book .
Before rushing off to demand Bolton as a witness , here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ raised that would fall in favor of the President , presenting potential explanations of him exercising power within the lawful scope of his Article II responsibilities .
First , with respect to concerns about Ukranian Corruption : And second , with respect to claims that this line of questioning was to destroy a 2020 political rival , if we have evidence of his concern predating Biden ’ s presidential run , that would potentially be a powerful refutation of the central claim Schiff has been making against Trump .

The Partisan Press loves to leak a story when it can do maximum damage to anyone and anything that stands in the way of Democrat objectives… was this ‘leak’ another coordinated hit?
Bolton and his book are in the news, with a salacious news ‘revelation’ about Ukraine just in time for the Senate Impeachment hearings.
Is it a coincidence? Or is this the Kavanaugh strategy all over again?
The same press that will dismiss very specific and documented questions about conflicts of interest involving Democrats like Biden as ‘debunked’ or ‘conspiracy theories’ seem to have zero objections to running with unverified (and later debunked) stories like Julie Swetnick’s allegations against Kavanaugh and the now-disproven Russian Collusion story.
In fact, the NYT and WaPo earned themselves Pulitzer Prizes over what literally proved to be a bogus story critical of the President.
They should convert those Pulitzer’s to #fakenews awards. How do you win a reporting award for reporting fake news? There should be a recall. Those Pulitzer’s were earned like Liz Warren’s tenure. https://t.co/5Bak6VTQ5G — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) March 24, 2019
So, what about this new Bolton story that already has the squishy Republican Senators chomping at the bit to call Bolton as a witness.
Now that Trump’s team burned much of Schiff’s case to the ground in two short hours of rebuttal, the New York Times rushed to the rescue of the Impeachment project.
Here is how NYTimes pitched their story:
Even Brit Hume is calling BS here:
This came along right about on schedule. https://t.co/cSXZDVKpNB — Brit Hume (@brithume) January 27, 2020
That’s the first reaction of Mr. ‘Fair and Balanced’ himself, Brit Hume. He DOES admit it’s a big story. But clearly the timing looks suspicious, even to him.
It’s easy to say this conveniently-timed ‘bombshell’ bears the fingerprints of opportunism. There are several competing explanations for what’s REALLY happening here:
Here are the top contenders.
Explanation #1) NYTimes got a tip from some random ‘resister’ who caught wind of this story, and the accuracy is every bit as uncertain as that of the supposed ‘whistleblower’ himself, whose story, as it turns out, did not align with the transcript.
This explanation has the benefit of Occam’s Razor level simplicity. It takes only one motivated leaker.
Explanation #2) NYTimes was cooperating with someone on the inside of the Deep State, working (whether directly or indirectly) in concert with the cabal aligned with Schiff to take down Trump.
One might point to the GAO report that ‘conveniently’ released their report damaging to Trump on the very first day of the Senate hearings, with bold claims that Trump ‘broke the law’ while just as conveniently failing to mention that Obama, by that same standard, had done so at least seven times.
Maybe this could offer a clue…
Source: Alexander Vindman’s Brother, Yevgeny, Clears Publications by NSC Officials https://t.co/O7Utqn5j83 via @BreitbartNews — Joel B. Pollak (@joelpollak) January 27, 2020
Ouch. If this WAS Vindman’s handiwork, he’d best be VERY certain that he hasn’t stumbled into a Canary trap. Or it just might be himself he’s hurting most.
Explanation #3) Bolton, or someone on his team, is creating buzz to sell his book. A question has been raised the answer to which cannot be found anywhere other than within the pages of his book.
Amazing how this happened immediately after The New York Times ran their story, almost like it was coordinated to promote book sales! This tweet from Stelter was posted 25 minutes ago: pic.twitter.com/PXxWOyLJQu — Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) January 27, 2020
The Bolton preorder went up within minutes of me posting this It’s like magic! https://t.co/YCBiO9NoGv — Jack Posobiec?? (@JackPosobiec) January 27, 2020
Before rushing off to demand Bolton as a witness, here are a couple of points that were raised that would fall in favor of the President, presenting potential explanations of him exercising power within the lawful scope of his Article II responsibilities.
First, with respect to concerns about Ukranian Corruption:
Bolton's book manuscript clears Trump of all impeachment allegations by demonstrating that the President believed Ukraine interfered in US elections. Given that belief, right or wrong, pressuring Zelensky was completely within the job description of the presidency. #GameOver — Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) January 27, 2020
And second, with respect to claims that this line of questioning was to destroy a 2020 political rival, if we have evidence of his concern predating Biden’s presidential run, that would potentially be a powerful refutation of the central claim Schiff has been making against Trump.


clashdaily--2020-01-27--‘Pocahontas’ Warren Is TANKING In The Polls, But She Has A Plan For That — Play The Woman Card!

Senator Elizabeth Warren ( D-MA ) was a rising star in the race to be the Democratic nominee… then she started talking .
The more Warren spoke , the more of a liar she was revealed to be .
She has lied about : • saying that claim to Native American heritage didn ’ t benefit her • her children exclusively attending public school ( her son attended an elite private school for several years ) • being fired from a teaching job when she was “ visibly pregnant ” And that ’ s just her personal history .
Trending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pro-America Video… Do You Love This Message ?
Her refrain on the campaign trail was that she “ had a plan for that ” right up until it came to talking specifics .
It turns out that ( shocker ! )
Liz Warren undervalued the cost of Medicare For All and said that her plan would only include a tax on “ The Rich.
” Not only that , she failed to calculate the losses that would occur once Medicare For All was adopted .
Still , her plan included $ 20.5 trillion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Warren began to fade and there was a surge in support for the Democratic nominee that had the primary rigged against him in 2016 , she decided to toss Bernie under the bus and attempt to steal his support .
Many people ( rightly ) believe that Bernie was robbed in 2016 because he dared run a campaign against the rightful heir of Obama ’ s Progressive legacy , “ Crooked ” Hillary .
She claimed that Bernie told her that a woman can ’ t win in 2020 .
Her plan didn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Voters don ’ t like that kind of cattiness and Warren is a known liar .
But she ’ s doubling down on the claim now that her poll numbers in Iowa are taking a serious nose-dive .
According to a WaPo/ABC News poll , she ’ s lost more than half of her support among women ahead of the Iowa caucus , a critical voting block for Warren .
Overall , her support is down almost half nationally .
The support seems to have gone straight to Bernie .
Ahead of Iowa @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Post-ABC News national poll found that 12 percent of Democratic-leaning registered voters would back Warren in their state ’ s primary or caucus , down from 23 percent in October .
The Massachusetts Democrat has lost support among women aged 18 to 49 , sliding sharply from 27 percent to 12 percent , The Washington Post reported .
The poll also revealed an increase in support for Sanders in the past few months , with 23 percent of Democratic-leaning registered voters backing the Vermont independent compared to 17 percent in the October survey @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social media basically saying that women win elections , so vote for a woman .
Jimmy James seems to have it precisely correct — statistics don ’ t care about your feelings , Liz .
• # CNNisTrash Trends On Twitter As Debate Moderator Picks A Side In Bernie Vs. Warren Feud • Bill Gates Refuses To Overtly Support Elizabeth Warren Over President Trump — Leftists Are Furious • Pocahontas : When Questioned About Ethics And Biden , Ms ‘ I Have A Plan ’ Warren Is Suddenly Flustered • The Millionaire Vs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s New Campaign Ad Attacks The Super Rich

Senator Elizabeth Warren(D-MA) was a rising star in the race to be the Democratic nominee… then she started talking.
The more Warren spoke, the more of a liar she was revealed to be.
She has lied about:
having Native American heritage
saying that claim to Native American heritage didn’t benefit her
her children exclusively attending public school (her son attended an elite private school for several years)
being fired from a teaching job when she was “visibly pregnant”
And that’s just her personal history.
Her refrain on the campaign trail was that she “had a plan for that” right up until it came to talking specifics.
It turns out that (shocker!) Liz Warren undervalued the cost of Medicare For All and said that her plan would only include a tax on “The Rich.” Not only that, she failed to calculate the losses that would occur once Medicare For All was adopted. Still, her plan included $20.5 trillion in new spending.
As support for Warren began to fade and there was a surge in support for the Democratic nominee that had the primary rigged against him in 2016, she decided to toss Bernie under the bus and attempt to steal his support.
Many people (rightly) believe that Bernie was robbed in 2016 because he dared run a campaign against the rightful heir of Obama’s Progressive legacy, “Crooked” Hillary.
She claimed that Bernie told her that a woman can’t win in 2020.
Her plan didn’t work out so well. Voters don’t like that kind of cattiness and Warren is a known liar.
HOT MIC: Post-Debate Comments Catch Exchange Between Bernie And Pinocchiohantas… Who’s Lying?
But she’s doubling down on the claim now that her poll numbers in Iowa are taking a serious nose-dive.
According to a WaPo/ABC News poll, she’s lost more than half of her support among women ahead of the Iowa caucus, a critical voting block for Warren. Overall, her support is down almost half nationally. The support seems to have gone straight to Bernie.
Ahead of Iowa’s precinct caucuses, a Washington Post-ABC News national poll found that 12 percent of Democratic-leaning registered voters would back Warren in their state’s primary or caucus, down from 23 percent in October. The Massachusetts Democrat has lost support among women aged 18 to 49, sliding sharply from 27 percent to 12 percent, The Washington Post reported. The poll also revealed an increase in support for Sanders in the past few months, with 23 percent of Democratic-leaning registered voters backing the Vermont independent compared to 17 percent in the October survey. Source: Newsweek
So, she’s playing the “Woman Card.”
She posted a 4-minute video on social media basically saying that women win elections, so vote for a woman.
Women candidates have been outperforming men candidates in competitive elections since Donald Trump was elected. Women win. pic.twitter.com/azVeSLNuwI — Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) January 27, 2020
The reactions were pretty spectacular.
Jimmy James seems to have it precisely correct — statistics don’t care about your feelings, Liz.
Related:


clashdaily--2020-01-27--HERO STUFF: Crowd Cooperates To Save Woman Trapped Under SUV (Video)

Well done , New Yorkers .
That was awesome !
How do we know that human life is uniquely different from every other class of animal life ?
Because when a human life is in danger , we drop what we are doing to help a stranger .
For all the grief New Yorkers get for being brash and selfish when the chips are down , they can really step up .
In this video that ’ s exactly what they did .
Trending : WATCH : Trump Team Releases New Pro-America Video… Do You Love This Message ?
When @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , crowds literally ran to her aid .
They assessed the situation and didn ’ t wait around for authorities to come to the rescue , they put their backs into it , and did what needed doing before it was too late .
We can give you some good news about the pedestrian who was under that SUV , too : A spokesperson for the New York City Police Department told Insider that the victim , a 25-year-old woman , escaped the situation without serious injury .
Police said that the driver @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , turned from Norfolk Street to Delancey Street , hit the pedestrian while she crossed the street at a crosswalk , and then hit another car that was stopped at a traffic light .
The victim was alert and conscious when first responders arrived and was taken to the city ’ s Bellevue Hospital to treat pains , cuts , and bruises , the spokesperson said .
The driver was issued a summons for failing to yield , according to police .

Well done, New Yorkers. That was awesome!
How do we know that human life is uniquely different from every other class of animal life? Because when a human life is in danger, we drop what we are doing to help a stranger.
For all the grief New Yorkers get for being brash and selfish when the chips are down, they can really step up.
In this video that’s exactly what they did.
When a pedestrian was caught under an SUV, crowds literally ran to her aid.
They assessed the situation and didn’t wait around for authorities to come to the rescue, they put their backs into it, and did what needed doing before it was too late.
Just now at Delancey and Norfolk in the Lower East Side an accident ran over a pedestrian trapping them under an SUV. Onlookers just lifted the SUV, dragging the victim out. pic.twitter.com/uq1IHcSJ9k — help how do i change this (@colbydroscher) January 26, 2020
We can give you some good news about the pedestrian who was under that SUV, too:
A spokesperson for the New York City Police Department told Insider that the victim, a 25-year-old woman, escaped the situation without serious injury.
Police said that the driver of the SUV, a 65-year-old woman, turned from Norfolk Street to Delancey Street, hit the pedestrian while she crossed the street at a crosswalk, and then hit another car that was stopped at a traffic light.
The victim was alert and conscious when first responders arrived and was taken to the city’s Bellevue Hospital to treat pains, cuts, and bruises, the spokesperson said. The driver was issued a summons for failing to yield, according to police.


clashdaily--2020-01-27--Pro-Abortion Pete Asked By Pro-Life Democrat If Her Views Are Still Acceptable By The Party. Here’s

Pro-Abortion Pete Asked By Pro-Life Democrat If Her Views Are Still Acceptable By The Party. Here’s What He Said…

The “ Party of Tolerance ” doesn ’ t seem to be so tolerant with this particular issue .
At a Fox News town hall over the weekend , Mayor Pete Buttigieg was confronted by a self-described “ proud , pro-life Democrat ” about where pro-life Democrats fit in the modern Democratic party .
Kristen Day , 50 , from Oakton , Virginia has pro-life views but is still a Democrat .
She ’ s not alone .
There are millions of pro-life Democrats that are uncomfortable with the party ’ s shift from “ safe , legal , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weeks , government-funded , and without apology.
” The exchange between Day and Buttigieg was fascinating .
At one point , Buttigieg “ mansplains ” to Day that the choice to kill a child lies with a woman and her doctor and men and other women shouldn ’ t have a say in that .
It ’ s the classic “ bodily autonomy of the woman ” argument that conveniently sidesteps the central argument of the pro-life movement — the child is a separate life and is it wrong to extinguish that life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump Team Releases New Pro-America Video… Do You Love This Message ?
The Democratic Party is the party of death — change my mind .
DAY : I ’ m a proud pro-life Democrat .
Do you want the support of pro-life Democratic voters ?
There are about 21 million of us .
And if so , would you support more moderate platform language in the Democratic party to ensure that the party of diversity and inclusion does include everybody ?
BUTTIGIEG : Well , I respect where you ’ re coming from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But I ’ m not going to try to earn your vote by tricking you .
I am pro-choice .
I believe a woman ought to be able to make that decision .
Here ’ s what I — I know that the difference of opinion that you and I have is one that we have come by honestly .
And , the best that I can offer — and it may win your vote , and if not , I understand — the best that I can offer is that if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to draw the line , the next best thing we can do is agree on who should draw the line .
In my view it ’ s the woman faced with that decision in her own life .
Moderator Chris Wallace then jumps in and mentions that President Trump was the first American President to attend the March For Life and addressed the crowd there .
Wallace then asked Day if she was satisfied with Mayor Pete ’ s answer .
DAY : I was not because he didn ’ t answer the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ second part was the Democratic platform contains language that basically says that we don ’ t belong — we have no part in the party because it says abortion should be legal up to months and the government should pay for it .
And there ’ s nothing that says that people have a diversity of views on this issue should be included in the party .
In 1996 , and several years after that , there was language in the Democratic platform that said that we understand that people have very differing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are a “ big tent ” party that includes everybody , and therefore , we welcome people like you — people like me — into the party so we can work on issues that we agree on .
And so , my question for you is , would you be open on language like that in the Democratic platform that really did say that our party is diverse and inclusive and we want everybody ?
BUTTIGIEG : I support the position of my party that this kind of medical care needs to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Roe vs Wade framework that holds that early in pregnancy there are very few restrictions and late in pregnancy there are very few exceptions .
And again , the best I can offer is that we may disagree on that very important issue , and hopefully , we will be able to partner on other issues .
WALLACE : What do you say to Democrats who are pro-life ?
And obviously , there are millions of them as well .
What do you say to them on an issue of such deep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ particular issue and look at the whole sum of views or go find another party ?
BUTTIGIEG : Look , I never encountered a politician — or another person — that I agreed with 100 % of the time .
Even on very important things .
At the end of the day , this is what I believe .
People I care about and respect view it differently .
But this is something I believe is so important .
Especially because I ’ m never going have to make that decision .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but I can not imagine that a decision that a woman confronts is ever going to be better — medically or morally — because it ’ s being dictated by a government official .
That ’ s just where I am on the issue .
Imagine what the “ progressive ” Democratic party will be like in just a few years .
Governor Blackface Northam gave it away right before his yearbook photo scandal — he believes in abortion after delivery .
I can just hear the new slogan , “ It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and her kid ’ s pediatrician.
” These folks aren ’ t just completely disingenuous , they ’ re also ghoulish .

The “Party of Tolerance” doesn’t seem to be so tolerant with this particular issue.
At a Fox News town hall over the weekend, Mayor Pete Buttigieg was confronted by a self-described “proud, pro-life Democrat” about where pro-life Democrats fit in the modern Democratic party.
Kristen Day, 50, from Oakton, Virginia has pro-life views but is still a Democrat. She’s not alone. There are millions of pro-life Democrats that are uncomfortable with the party’s shift from “safe, legal, and rare” to “up to 40 weeks, government-funded, and without apology.”
The exchange between Day and Buttigieg was fascinating. At one point, Buttigieg “mansplains” to Day that the choice to kill a child lies with a woman and her doctor and men and other women shouldn’t have a say in that. It’s the classic “bodily autonomy of the woman” argument that conveniently sidesteps the central argument of the pro-life movement — the child is a separate life and is it wrong to extinguish that life for convenience?
The Democratic Party is the party of death — change my mind.
DAY: I’m a proud pro-life Democrat. Do you want the support of pro-life Democratic voters? There are about 21 million of us. And if so, would you support more moderate platform language in the Democratic party to ensure that the party of diversity and inclusion does include everybody?
BUTTIGIEG: Well, I respect where you’re coming from and I hope to ensure your vote. But I’m not going to try to earn your vote by tricking you. I am pro-choice. I believe a woman ought to be able to make that decision. Here’s what I — I know that the difference of opinion that you and I have is one that we have come by honestly. And, the best that I can offer — and it may win your vote, and if not, I understand — the best that I can offer is that if we can’t agree on where to draw the line, the next best thing we can do is agree on who should draw the line. In my view it’s the woman faced with that decision in her own life.
Moderator Chris Wallace then jumps in and mentions that President Trump was the first American President to attend the March For Life and addressed the crowd there. Wallace then asked Day if she was satisfied with Mayor Pete’s answer.
DAY: I was not because he didn’t answer the second part of my question. The second part was the Democratic platform contains language that basically says that we don’t belong — we have no part in the party because it says abortion should be legal up to months and the government should pay for it. And there’s nothing that says that people have a diversity of views on this issue should be included in the party. In 1996, and several years after that, there was language in the Democratic platform that said that we understand that people have very differing views on this issue, but we are a “big tent” party that includes everybody, and therefore, we welcome people like you — people like me — into the party so we can work on issues that we agree on. And so, my question for you is, would you be open on language like that in the Democratic platform that really did say that our party is diverse and inclusive and we want everybody?
BUTTIGIEG: I support the position of my party that this kind of medical care needs to be available to everyone. And I support the Roe vs Wade framework that holds that early in pregnancy there are very few restrictions and late in pregnancy there are very few exceptions. And again, the best I can offer is that we may disagree on that very important issue, and hopefully, we will be able to partner on other issues.
WALLACE: What do you say to Democrats who are pro-life? And obviously, there are millions of them as well. What do you say to them on an issue of such deep conscience? That they should overlook this particular issue and look at the whole sum of views or go find another party?
BUTTIGIEG: Look, I never encountered a politician — or another person — that I agreed with 100% of the time. Even on very important things. At the end of the day, this is what I believe. People I care about and respect view it differently. But this is something I believe is so important. Especially because I’m never going have to make that decision. And so, I may have my views, but I cannot imagine that a decision that a woman confronts is ever going to be better — medically or morally — because it’s being dictated by a government official. That’s just where I am on the issue.
Watch:
Imagine what the “progressive” Democratic party will be like in just a few years. Governor Blackface Northam gave it away right before his yearbook photo scandal — he believes in abortion after delivery.
I can just hear the new slogan, “It’s a choice between a woman and her kid’s pediatrician.”
These folks aren’t just completely disingenuous, they’re also ghoulish.


clashdaily--2020-01-28--ABRACADABRA: GM Pouring Billions Into Detroit Assembly Plant, Providing 2200 Jobs

GM ’ s newest and most advanced assembly plant will be setting up shop in Detroit , and bringing new jobs with it .
Trump and Obama are two very different presidents who work some very different magic .
Obama announced , when he won the Presidential primary , that this was the day the Earth began to heal and the waters began to recede .
This will come as welcome news to one Greta Thunberg , who has yet to get that memo .
Trump , on the other hand , works a very different sort of magic .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ New Pro-America Video… Do You Love This Message ?
AFter years of Obama telling us we needed to get used to the fact that manufacturing jobs had gone the way of the buggy-whip , Trump said he would bring the jobs back .
Obama mocked him , asking what kind of a magic wand he would use to accomplish that .
That ’ s why every time we see stories like this one about manufacturing jobs coming back , the mocking reply is ‘ abracadabra ’ .
Trump negotiated trade , leveraged tariffs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tape .
Just like he said it would .
And the results were precisely the sort he had promised us .
Now that GM and their Union have hammered out their differences , they are charting their new path forward together .
General Motors is investing $ 2.2 billion in its Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly plant to make it a state-of-the-art facility building electric and self-driving cars .
The automaker said Monday the plant will provide 2,200 jobs as it shifts to become the company ’ s first all-electric vehicle plant .
Detroit-Hamtramck will start @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2021 , then build the Cruise Origin , an all-electric self-driving car .
“ This will be General Motors ’ most technically advanced assembly plant , ” GM President Mark Reuss said in a news conference at the facility .
“ That ’ s really amazing.
” Source : DetroitFreePress

GM’s newest and most advanced assembly plant will be setting up shop in Detroit, and bringing new jobs with it.
Trump and Obama are two very different presidents who work some very different magic.
Obama announced, when he won the Presidential primary, that this was the day the Earth began to heal and the waters began to recede. This will come as welcome news to one Greta Thunberg, who has yet to get that memo.
Trump, on the other hand, works a very different sort of magic.
AFter years of Obama telling us we needed to get used to the fact that manufacturing jobs had gone the way of the buggy-whip, Trump said he would bring the jobs back.
Obama mocked him, asking what kind of a magic wand he would use to accomplish that. That’s why every time we see stories like this one about manufacturing jobs coming back, the mocking reply is ‘abracadabra’.
Trump negotiated trade, leveraged tariffs, cut taxes, and reduced red tape. Just like he said it would. And the results were precisely the sort he had promised us.
Now that GM and their Union have hammered out their differences, they are charting their new path forward together.


clashdaily--2020-01-28--Dear MAGA Peeps: Here Is Your Daily Reminder That CNN Absolutely HATES You (Video)

But Mr. hands-in-his-pants Don Lemon is a ‘ serious ’ journalist .
He ’ s convinced he has every RIGHT to mock the rest of us ‘ rubes ’ like this… because he is CNN .
The reason the Left is so viciously anti-Trump is because he figured out early on exactly what he ’ s dealing with .
The media is NOT our friend .
They are the scorpion on the back of the frog in that parable , and they need to be treated as such .
That ’ s why he blasts them every chance he gets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everything so very wrong .
Here is the sometimes-sober and not-biased-at-all CNN host Don Lemon giving us a proud display of his down-the-middle dispassionate and professional journalism .
Don Lemon ’ s guests were CNN contributor and NYT op-ed writer , Wajahat Ali and Never-Trump self-described “ apostate GOP media guy ” Rick Wilson .
Trending : WATCH : Trump Team Releases New Pro-America Video… Do You Love This Message ?
Now , as you watch this clip mocking the ‘ credulous ’ right , keep in mind that these are the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years that Trump was *absolutely* Putin ’ s puppet and anyonw who couldn ’ t see that was blind to the obvious .
And then the Mueller Report blew that lie halfway to hell .
These are the very same guys who just paid out a defamation settlement to Nick Sandmann over the Covington Kids incident last year ; who went all-in on the laughable Jussie Smollett hoax .
These guys really do believe they are above the rest of us .
Smarter than the rest of us .
They even believe they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us .
As though they believe America can ’ t see right through them .
Oh , and the President saw the clip too .
What did he have to say about it ?
Well , pretty much what you ’ d expect .
Although we ’ re not sure about calling him the dumbest .
There is some really stiff competition from Cuomo and Stelter for that one .
And Chuck Todd for that matter .
• CNN ’ s Don Lemon Is Triggered By A Meme — And It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Meme… Now He ’ s IN One • Don Lemon Gets Very , Very Drunk Ringing In The New Year On Live CNN Broadcast

But Mr. hands-in-his-pants Don Lemon is a ‘serious’ journalist. He’s convinced he has every RIGHT to mock the rest of us ‘rubes’ like this… because he is CNN.
The reason the Left is so viciously anti-Trump is because he figured out early on exactly what he’s dealing with. The media is NOT our friend. They are the scorpion on the back of the frog in that parable, and they need to be treated as such.
That’s why he blasts them every chance he gets. And he mocks them for getting everything so very wrong.
Here is the sometimes-sober and not-biased-at-all CNN host Don Lemon giving us a proud display of his down-the-middle dispassionate and professional journalism. Don Lemon’s guests were CNN contributor and NYT op-ed writer, Wajahat Ali and Never-Trump self-described “apostate GOP media guy” Rick Wilson.
Now, as you watch this clip mocking the ‘credulous’ right, keep in mind that these are the same MENSA rejects that assured us for two years that Trump was *absolutely* Putin’s puppet and anyonw who couldn’t see that was blind to the obvious.
And then the Mueller Report blew that lie halfway to hell.
Don Lemon, the dumbest man on television (with terrible ratings!). https://t.co/iQXCc7lvCt — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 28, 2020
These are the very same guys who just paid out a defamation settlement to Nick Sandmann over the Covington Kids incident last year; who went all-in on the laughable Jussie Smollett hoax.
These guys really do believe they are above the rest of us.
Smarter than the rest of us.
They even believe they are better people than the rest of us.
As though they believe America can’t see right through them.
Oh, and the President saw the clip too. What did he have to say about it? Well, pretty much what you’d expect.
Don Lemon, the dumbest man on television (with terrible ratings!). https://t.co/iQXCc7lvCt — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 28, 2020
Although we’re not sure about calling him the dumbest. There is some really stiff competition from Cuomo and Stelter for that one. And Chuck Todd for that matter.
Related:


clashdaily--2020-01-28--Withdraw The Book: Bolton’s COS Worried About Setting Dangerous Precedent

Fred Fleitz sees Bolton ’ s book as setting a dangerous election-year precedent .
And has written an op-ed to say so .
He ’ s writing this , not as a hit piece , but as a close friend and former staffer of Bolton .
As we know , the whole point of being an advisor to the President is the ability to have the hard conversations where you candidly express your opinions to get the best possible advice .
If this precedent is set that advisors rush off to get a tell-all book deal in an election year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ free Presidents will be to have the candid conversations they need to truly grapple with complex issues in the future ?
Sure Bolton may get his multi-million book deal ( especially if it throws Trump under the bus ) … but at what cost to the American national interest ?
Trending : WATCH : Trump Team Releases New Pro-America Video… Do You Love This Message ?
Fleitz reminds us that Bolton knew — or ought to have known — that the manuscript would need to be vetted by National Security Counsel for compliance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — our ought to have known — that there are any number of moles in the NSC , eager to rush off to the press with anything even remotely damaging to the President .
Fleitz is more than happy to recount the many successes of Bolton in helping Trump implement important policies and even the criticisms of Bolton ’ s role as advisor were ( in his view ) overblown and at least partly owed to his rocky relationship with Obama holdovers .
His column speaks respectfully of an advisor under Obama who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ run its course before releasing his book critical of what he saw as Obama ’ s failings as President .
Bolton should have done the same .
With the release of this book , he ’ s not only thrown himself — and his ax to grind — into the center of this election cycle , but he ’ s turned him own story into a sideshow in Schiff ’ s impeachment circus .
How is that really in the best interests of the country ?
Here is the real meat of his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by a former national security adviser ahead of a president ’ s reelection bid may set a dangerous precedent since it could discourage future presidents from seeking advice from expert advisers on sensitive national security matters .
This is why executive privilege exists : to allow the president and other senior officials to keep certain communications and internal deliberations private if disclosing them would disrupt the functions or decision-making processes of the executive branch .
I haven ’ t seen Bolton ’ s book manuscript and I don ’ t know what ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and his staff at their word that they did not leak the manuscript to the New York Times .
But I believe they are still responsible for this leak since Bolton ’ s explosive book was sent to the leak-prone National Security Council for a security review in December 2019 so the book could be published in the spring of 2020 .
It also is inexplicable how such a sensitive manuscript could be sent to the NSC in the middle of the impeachment process .
Under such circumstances , a leak of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a manuscript of this sensitivity was to be published at all , this should happen after the election , not in the spring of 2020 .
I don ’ t understand the need for a former National Security Adviser to publish a tell-all book critical of a president he served , especially during a presidential reelection campaign that will determine the fate of the country .
There will be a time for Bolton to speak out without appearing to try to tip a presidential election .
Would he listen to that advice ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ friend ’ s reasoning , is he even ABLE to pull the plug on it at this point ?
Or is the damage already done ?

Fred Fleitz sees Bolton’s book as setting a dangerous election-year precedent. And has written an op-ed to say so. He’s writing this, not as a hit piece, but as a close friend and former staffer of Bolton.
As we know, the whole point of being an advisor to the President is the ability to have the hard conversations where you candidly express your opinions to get the best possible advice.
If this precedent is set that advisors rush off to get a tell-all book deal in an election year, what will that mean for how free Presidents will be to have the candid conversations they need to truly grapple with complex issues in the future?
Sure Bolton may get his multi-million book deal (especially if it throws Trump under the bus) … but at what cost to the American national interest?
Fleitz reminds us that Bolton knew — or ought to have known — that the manuscript would need to be vetted by National Security Counsel for compliance with security protocols. He also knows — our ought to have known — that there are any number of moles in the NSC, eager to rush off to the press with anything even remotely damaging to the President.
Fleitz is more than happy to recount the many successes of Bolton in helping Trump implement important policies and even the criticisms of Bolton’s role as advisor were (in his view) overblown and at least partly owed to his rocky relationship with Obama holdovers.
His column speaks respectfully of an advisor under Obama who waited until AFTER the 2012 election had run its course before releasing his book critical of what he saw as Obama’s failings as President.
Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who stepped down in June 2011, published a devastating book titled “Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War” that detailed the incompetence of Vice President Joe Biden and the Obama National Security Council staff. But because he did not want his internal knowledge of the workings of the Obama administration and his interactions with President Obama to affect the outcome of the 2012 presidential election, Gates did not publish his book until January 2014.
Bolton should have done the same. With the release of this book, he’s not only thrown himself — and his ax to grind — into the center of this election cycle, but he’s turned him own story into a sideshow in Schiff’s impeachment circus.
How is that really in the best interests of the country?
Here is the real meat of his open letter to Bolton:
A book by a former national security adviser ahead of a president’s reelection bid may set a dangerous precedent since it could discourage future presidents from seeking advice from expert advisers on sensitive national security matters. This is why executive privilege exists: to allow the president and other senior officials to keep certain communications and internal deliberations private if disclosing them would disrupt the functions or decision-making processes of the executive branch. I haven’t seen Bolton’s book manuscript and I don’t know what’s in it. I take Bolton and his staff at their word that they did not leak the manuscript to the New York Times. But I believe they are still responsible for this leak since Bolton’s explosive book was sent to the leak-prone National Security Council for a security review in December 2019 so the book could be published in the spring of 2020. It also is inexplicable how such a sensitive manuscript could be sent to the NSC in the middle of the impeachment process. Under such circumstances, a leak of the manuscript was all but certain. If a manuscript of this sensitivity was to be published at all, this should happen after the election, not in the spring of 2020. I don’t understand the need for a former National Security Adviser to publish a tell-all book critical of a president he served, especially during a presidential reelection campaign that will determine the fate of the country. There will be a time for Bolton to speak out without appearing to try to tip a presidential election.
Here’s his closing thought:
Gates established a principled precedent on how senior advisers to presidents should write about their experiences. Given Ambassador Bolton’s long and distinguished record of government service, I believe it is vital that he follow this precedent.
Would he listen to that advice?
Suppose Bolton was won over by his friend’s reasoning, is he even ABLE to pull the plug on it at this point? Or is the damage already done?


clashdaily--2020-01-28--WATCH: Ted Cruz Lights Up Reporter For Suggesting His Young Kids Should Be In Prison

Reporters are working so hard to NOT report on the Biden family ’ s obvious conflicts of interest that they ’ re making ludicrous accusations to deflect from it .
Isn ’ t this the same press that cheered for the boycotts on the Trump family ’ s businesses , who under-reported the death threats against his kids , who amplified bogus allegations against Donald Trump Jr , looked the other way at illegal leaks from Schiff ’ s circles and threw around the phrase ‘ Emoluments Clause ’ like a midget in a mosh pit ?
But suddenly , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a ( D ) after his name come up and the Media ( D ) avoid it like radioactive waste .
But the free press ‘ speaks truth to power ’ , don ’ t you see ?
They ’ re just very selective on how they use words like ‘ truth ’ or ‘ power ’ .
Trending : WATCH : Trump Team Releases New Pro-America Video… Do You Love This Message ?
Now that Trump ’ s defense team took direct aim at any claims that the conflicts of interest between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Oligarchs are ‘ debunked ’ , blowing that theory halfway to Hell , reporters were frantically trying to reclaim the narrative .
Since they could no longer shield Biden , their fallback position was ‘ everybody does it ’ .
One reporter was dumb enough to try that line of argument with Ted Cruz , and Cruz saw it coming a mile away .
The reporter , whoever it was , didn ’ t stop to consider the fact that Ted ’ s kids aren ’ t even teenagers yet .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ real reporter might dig a little deeper and wonder which politicians have relatives getting fat wallets out of the nepotistic government connections , and if there are any patterns in their voting records , party affiliations and so forth .
If you want to talk about ‘ dark money ’ THIS is where it ’ s really at .
Biden himself has been connected to reports of 5 relatives benefiting from his role as Vice President .
Kerry and Pelosi had relatives working for Energy companies in Ukraine , too .
If there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from high office , go ahead and report on that , too .
We ’ d be glad to get rid of those RINOs .
We actually WANT the swamp drained , and want control put back in the hands of We The People , rather than some faceless backroom DC powerbrokers .
If they wonder why we call them fake news , it ’ s not just because of what they DO report , but just as importantly , it ’ s what they REFUSE to report on .
They ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get upset at Fox News who is up-front about their opinion side being explicitly partisan , but their news coverage more down-the-middle .

Reporters are working so hard to NOT report on the Biden family’s obvious conflicts of interest that they’re making ludicrous accusations to deflect from it.
Isn’t this the same press that cheered for the boycotts on the Trump family’s businesses, who under-reported the death threats against his kids, who amplified bogus allegations against Donald Trump Jr, looked the other way at illegal leaks from Schiff’s circles and threw around the phrase ‘Emoluments Clause’ like a midget in a mosh pit?
But suddenly, conflicts of interest surrounding a politician with a (D) after his name come up and the Media(D) avoid it like radioactive waste.
But the free press ‘speaks truth to power’, don’t you see? They’re just very selective on how they use words like ‘truth’ or ‘power’.
Now that Trump’s defense team took direct aim at any claims that the conflicts of interest between the Biden family, Burisma and Ukraine Oligarchs are ‘debunked’, blowing that theory halfway to Hell, reporters were frantically trying to reclaim the narrative.
Since they could no longer shield Biden, their fallback position was ‘everybody does it’.
One reporter was dumb enough to try that line of argument with Ted Cruz, and Cruz saw it coming a mile away.
https://twitter.com/search?q=ted+cruz+kid+jail
The reporter, whoever it was, didn’t stop to consider the fact that Ted’s kids aren’t even teenagers yet.
This is highlight-reel level of journalistic self-owning.
A real reporter might dig a little deeper and wonder which politicians have relatives getting fat wallets out of the nepotistic government connections, and if there are any patterns in their voting records, party affiliations and so forth.
If you want to talk about ‘dark money’ THIS is where it’s really at. Biden himself has been connected to reports of 5 relatives benefiting from his role as Vice President. Kerry and Pelosi had relatives working for Energy companies in Ukraine, too.
If there are swamp critters on the right profiting from high office, go ahead and report on that, too. We’d be glad to get rid of those RINOs. We actually WANT the swamp drained, and want control put back in the hands of We The People, rather than some faceless backroom DC powerbrokers.
If they wonder why we call them fake news, it’s not just because of what they DO report, but just as importantly, it’s what they REFUSE to report on.
They’re entirely partisan and yet, somehow, get upset at Fox News who is up-front about their opinion side being explicitly partisan, but their news coverage more down-the-middle.