clashdaily--2020-01-15--#CNNisTrash Trends On Twitter As Debate Moderator Picks A Side In Bernie Vs. Warren Feud

CNN has their fingerprints all over the dispute between Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren .
On Sunday , CNN published a story claiming that Senator Bernie Sanders ( D-VT ) told Senator Elizabeth Warren ( D-MA ) that he didn ’ t think that a woman could win .
The private December 2018 meeting , the pair met to discuss how they would interact if they faced off against each other to become the Democratic nominee in 2020 .
They agreed that they would remain civil to avoid hurting the progressive movement and discussed the best strategies to take on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fed by the Warren campaign , as CNN ’ s “ sources ” said that it was after Warren put forward two main points on why she ’ d be a good candidate — that she could make a “ robust argument ” about the economy as well as gain widespread support from women — that Sanders allegedly said that he did not believe a woman could win .
Once the story was made public , Bernie flatly denied the claim pointing to his statement in 1988 where he said he believed that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doubled-down , however , and issued a statement saying that it did indeed happen .
This made for an awkward couple of moments at the debate .
The first was when CNN ’ s debate moderator Abby Phillip first asked Bernie about the statement .
PHILLIP : CNN reported yesterday and senator warren confirmed in a statement that in 2018 you told her that you did not believe a woman could win the presidential election .
Why did you say that ?
SANDERS : Well , as a matter of fact , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I don ’ t want to waste a whole lot of time on this because this is what Donald Trump and maybe some of the media want .
Anybody [ who ] knows me , knows that it ’ s incomprehensible that I would think that a woman could not become president of the United States .
Go to YouTube today , there ’ s a video of me 30 years ago talking about how a woman could become president of the United States .
In 2015 , I deferred , in fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a movement to draft Senator Warren to run for president .
And you know what ?
I said , “ Stay back.
” Senator Warren decided not to run and I did .
I did run afterwards .
Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by 3 million votes .
How could anybody in a million years not think that a woman could be President of the United States ?
And let me be very clear , if any of the women on this stage , or any of the men on this stage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s not the case , I hope it ’ s me — but if they do , I will do everything in my power to make sure that they are elected in order to defeat the most dangerous President in the history of our country .
PHILLIP : So Sen. Sanders , I do want to be clear here , you ’ re saying that you never told Sen. Warren that a woman could not win the election ?
Phillips then immediately asked Warren what she thought when Bernie made the statement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Well , it looks like Abby Phillip is clearly Team Warren , or at least Team Not Bernie .
This is typical of CNN ’ s journalism — just ignore the thing that goes against the narrative and pretend that it doesn ’ t exist .
But that wasn ’ t the end of the Sanders/Warren dispute .
Check out how Warren snubbed Sanders at the end of the debate — Sanders offers his hand and Warren refuses the handshake .
Tom Steyer got in the middle of the awkward situation… …but told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know what the pair were talking about .
The whole thing really angered the Bernie Bros who finally realize that CNN is in fact trash .
Well , look at that .
At least we can agree on something , Bernie Bros !

CNN has their fingerprints all over the dispute between Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.
On Sunday, CNN published a story claiming that Senator Bernie Sanders(D-VT) told Senator Elizabeth Warren(D-MA) that he didn’t think that a woman could win. The private December 2018 meeting, the pair met to discuss how they would interact if they faced off against each other to become the Democratic nominee in 2020. They agreed that they would remain civil to avoid hurting the progressive movement and discussed the best strategies to take on President Trump.
The story was clearly fed by the Warren campaign, as CNN’s “sources” said that it was after Warren put forward two main points on why she’d be a good candidate — that she could make a “robust argument” about the economy as well as gain widespread support from women — that Sanders allegedly said that he did not believe a woman could win.
Once the story was made public, Bernie flatly denied the claim pointing to his statement in 1988 where he said he believed that a woman could become President.
“In my view a woman could be elected president of the United States.” — Bernie Sanders, 1988 pic.twitter.com/WJd847DdmA — Meagan Day (@meaganmday) January 13, 2020
Warren doubled-down, however, and issued a statement saying that it did indeed happen.
“Among the topics that came up [during the meeting] was what would happen if Democrats nominated a female candidate. I thought a woman could win; he disagreed. I have no interest in discussing this private meeting any further because Bernie and I have far more in common than our differences on punditry,” Warren said. Source: The Daily Caller
This made for an awkward couple of moments at the debate.
The first was when CNN’s debate moderator Abby Phillip first asked Bernie about the statement.
PHILLIP: CNN reported yesterday and senator warren confirmed in a statement that in 2018 you told her that you did not believe a woman could win the presidential election. Why did you say that?
SANDERS: Well, as a matter of fact, I didn’t say it. And I don’t want to waste a whole lot of time on this because this is what Donald Trump and maybe some of the media want. Anybody [who] knows me, knows that it’s incomprehensible that I would think that a woman could not become president of the United States. Go to YouTube today, there’s a video of me 30 years ago talking about how a woman could become president of the United States. In 2015, I deferred, in fact, to Senator Warren, there was a movement to draft Senator Warren to run for president. And you know what? I said, “Stay back.” Senator Warren decided not to run and I did. I did run afterwards. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by 3 million votes. How could anybody in a million years not think that a woman could be President of the United States? And let me be very clear, if any of the women on this stage, or any of the men on this stage win the nomination — I hope that’s not the case, I hope it’s me — but if they do, I will do everything in my power to make sure that they are elected in order to defeat the most dangerous President in the history of our country.
PHILLIP: So Sen. Sanders, I do want to be clear here, you’re saying that you never told Sen. Warren that a woman could not win the election?
SANDERS: That is correct.
WATCH: Bernie Sanders responds to reports that he told Elizabeth Warren that a woman couldn't win the election: "Well, as a matter of fact, I didn't say it." pic.twitter.com/ZxwDqiQhfC — Axios (@axios) January 15, 2020
Phillips then immediately asked Warren what she thought when Bernie made the statement that he just flat-out denied saying.
CNN: “Sen. Sanders, I do want to be clear here, you’re saying that you never told senator Warren that a woman could not win the election?"
SANDERS: "That is correct."
CNN: “Sen. Warren, what did you think when senator Sanders told you a woman could not win the election?" pic.twitter.com/BZ1NajmQE9 — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) January 15, 2020
Well, it looks like Abby Phillip is clearly Team Warren, or at least Team Not Bernie.
This is typical of CNN’s journalism — just ignore the thing that goes against the narrative and pretend that it doesn’t exist.
But that wasn’t the end of the Sanders/Warren dispute.
Check out how Warren snubbed Sanders at the end of the debate — Sanders offers his hand and Warren refuses the handshake.
At the end of the debate, Bernie Sanders reached out to shake hands with Elizabeth Warren and Warren just rejected it. AWKWARD. pic.twitter.com/DDM9Y8vb8R — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) January 15, 2020
Tom Steyer got in the middle of the awkward situation…
…but told CNN hosts that he doesn’t know what the pair were talking about.
Tom Steyer, who ended up in the middle of an awkward moment between Sens. Warren and Sanders after the #DemDebate, says he “really wasn’t listening” to their conversation. “It was one of the awkward moments where I felt like, ‘You know what? I need to move on as fast possible.’” pic.twitter.com/AL7dGxq5HC — CNN (@CNN) January 15, 2020
The whole thing really angered the Bernie Bros who finally realize that CNN is in fact trash.
In times when our democracy needs transparent and unbiased journalism, CNN decides to take the worst route of them all. #CNNisTrash pic.twitter.com/ozl1WslVKS — Sam ?? (@SamirLevi) January 15, 2020
Left wing Bernie supporters are upset with tonight’s rigged CNN debate and are tweeting #CNNisTrash. https://t.co/99GxIqDHbm — Mike Cernovich (@Cernovich) January 15, 2020
Well, look at that. At least we can agree on something, Bernie Bros!


clashdaily--2020-01-15--The Arrogance Of Speaker Pelosi

The Arrogance Of Speaker Pelosi

Years ago , Solomon wrote , “ Pride goes before destruction , a haughty spirit before a fall.
” ( Proverbs 16:18 ) This truth is about to be played out in real-time with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-CA ) .
Speaker Pelosi has been in Congress for over thirty-one years and has served three times as House Speaker .
Throughout her time , she ’ s advocated liberal , Democrat policies .
As bad as she ’ s been over the years ( and that ’ s pretty awful ) , Pelosi ’ s arrogant , dishonest actions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pelosi somehow believes that she has the moral high ground .
That would be a laughable sentence if it wasn ’ t so damaging to the country .
She led off the impeachment fiasco by asserting that it had to be bipartisan .
In March of 2019 she said in an interview , “ impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there ’ s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan , I don ’ t think we should go down that path.
” It seems Nancy was lying .
She @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bipartisan thing .
It was always the Democrat plan and as soon as the country gave them control of the House , the impeachment machine got rolling .
It was an action looking for a crime to fuel it .
In the end , having nothing and running out of time , the Democrats impeached the president because they hate him , and by extension , those of us who voted for him .
Trending : NASTY : CDC Names US Cities With Highest STD Rates ... Is Yours On The List ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of impeachment on January 15th knowing that , constitutionally , the Senate makes the rules for the impeachment hearing .
She also knows that the House managers have no case and that President Trump will not be removed from office .
She ’ s angry , agitated , and frustrated .
In an ABC interview over the weekend , she bitterly spat , “ This president is impeached for life regardless of any gamesmanship on the part of Mitch McConnell .
There is nothing the Senate can do to ever erase that.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hate , this statement drips with loathing .
Pelosi and her Democrat cronies in the House told us that impeachment was urgent .
On December 5 , 2019 , Stephen Collinson , writing in a CNN blog , wrote , “ House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ’ s Democrats are injecting an urgent new argument into their already fast-moving impeachment drive : President Donald Trump poses such a flagrant threat to American governance and democracy that there is no time to waste.
” They were lying again .
President Trump is such a flagrant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Democrats held the articles of impeachment four weeks before sending them to the Senate !
The arrogance of Pelosi and the Democrats knows no bounds .
They think we can ’ t see through this charade .
They think we can ’ t see their real motive .
Impeachment is a 2020 campaign tool .
Pelosi also demonstrated her arrogance in sending over the articles of impeachment .
Earlier this week , in an interview , she declared , “ senators will pay a price if they block new witnesses from testifying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump.
” She said Americans expect a fair trial .
It ’ s hard to see how she would know a fair trial if she saw one .
Certainly , the Schiff show that masqueraded as an impeach inquiry was anything but fair .
She then doubled down , arrogantly adding , “ The House will now proceed with a vote on transmitting the articles of impeachment and naming impeachment managers on Wednesday .
The president and the senators will be held accountable.
” Let ’ s look at that last statement just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ president accountable would fit , but how will the Senate be held accountable ?
Clearly what she means is if the Senate doesn ’ t agree with her , they are covering up .
Where I come from , demanding that others see things as you do is the height of arrogance .
That ’ s the position of the Democrats and their despicable media accomplices .
Their hatred of Trump has blinded them and rendered them incapable of objectivity .
How else can their lack of support for the Iranian protestors be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It might be a lesson Speaker Pelosi and her Democrat party should consider .

Years ago, Solomon wrote, “Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall.” (Proverbs 16:18) This truth is about to be played out in real-time with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). Speaker Pelosi has been in Congress for over thirty-one years and has served three times as House Speaker. Throughout her time, she’s advocated liberal, Democrat policies. As bad as she’s been over the years (and that’s pretty awful), Pelosi’s arrogant, dishonest actions regarding impeachment are over the top.
Pelosi somehow believes that she has the moral high ground. That would be a laughable sentence if it wasn’t so damaging to the country.
She led off the impeachment fiasco by asserting that it had to be bipartisan. In March of 2019 she said in an interview, “impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path.”
It seems Nancy was lying. She never intended for it to be a bipartisan thing. It was always the Democrat plan and as soon as the country gave them control of the House, the impeachment machine got rolling. It was an action looking for a crime to fuel it. In the end, having nothing and running out of time, the Democrats impeached the president because they hate him, and by extension, those of us who voted for him.
She’s sending over the articles of impeachment on January 15th knowing that, constitutionally, the Senate makes the rules for the impeachment hearing. She also knows that the House managers have no case and that President Trump will not be removed from office. She’s angry, agitated, and frustrated. In an ABC interview over the weekend, she bitterly spat, “This president is impeached for life regardless of any gamesmanship on the part of Mitch McConnell. There is nothing the Senate can do to ever erase that.”
As much as she claims to not hate, this statement drips with loathing.
Pelosi and her Democrat cronies in the House told us that impeachment was urgent. On December 5, 2019, Stephen Collinson, writing in a CNN blog, wrote, “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s Democrats are injecting an urgent new argument into their already fast-moving impeachment drive: President Donald Trump poses such a flagrant threat to American governance and democracy that there is no time to waste.”
They were lying again. President Trump is such a flagrant threat to American governance that Pelosi and the Democrats held the articles of impeachment four weeks before sending them to the Senate! The arrogance of Pelosi and the Democrats knows no bounds. They think we can’t see through this charade. They think we can’t see their real motive. Impeachment is a 2020 campaign tool.
Pelosi also demonstrated her arrogance in sending over the articles of impeachment. Earlier this week, in an interview, she declared, “senators will pay a price if they block new witnesses from testifying in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.” She said Americans expect a fair trial. It’s hard to see how she would know a fair trial if she saw one. Certainly, the Schiff show that masqueraded as an impeach inquiry was anything but fair. She then doubled down, arrogantly adding, “The House will now proceed with a vote on transmitting the articles of impeachment and naming impeachment managers on Wednesday. The president and the senators will be held accountable.”
Let’s look at that last statement just a second. I suppose holding the president accountable would fit, but how will the Senate be held accountable? Clearly what she means is if the Senate doesn’t agree with her, they are covering up. Where I come from, demanding that others see things as you do is the height of arrogance.
That’s the position of the Democrats and their despicable media accomplices. Their hatred of Trump has blinded them and rendered them incapable of objectivity. How else can their lack of support for the Iranian protestors be explained?
Pride goes before a fall. It might be a lesson Speaker Pelosi and her Democrat party should consider.


clashdaily--2020-01-15--Alec Baldwin Blames Trump Supporters For ‘Near Moral Collapse Of This Country’ — Is He High?

Actor John Wilkes Booth clearly wasn ’ t a fan of the first Republican President and thus has been with actors and GOP presidents ever since .
Your moral betters in Hollywood have made it very clear that they truly despise President Trump .
In 2016 , they appeared in ads telling you to vote and which candidate was the “ correct ” choice .
They fearmongered , they begged , but they were wrong .
Despite what you think of Donald J. Trump as a human being , what his tweets are like , and how he has treated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ done one helluva good job as President .
And the left hates it .
In just the past week , they ’ ve outdone themselves .
If you thought the partisan impeachment-in-search-of-a-crime was bad , we ’ ve just witnessed Trump Derangement Syndrome push Democrats and their Media ( D ) sycophants to come running to praise an Iranian terrorist to “ own Trump.
” It ’ s embarrassing .
Trending : WATCH : Project Veritas Video Exposes Bernie 's Campaign Organizer As PRO-Gulag And PRO-Reeducation But , the Hollywood pretty people are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has broken our entire democracy — at least that ’ s what they claim he has done .
Yes , the people that want to get rid of the Electoral College , erase Constitutional amendments , disregard immigration law , cede control of our country to the United Nations , and criminalize actually living out either Christian or Jewish faith , are upset that President Trump is “ upsetting the norms.
” Alec Baldwin , who won an Emmy for his Saturday Night Live appearances as President Trump , is now blaming Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the country .
American democracy has always been a struggle between the misaligned protections of specific freedoms and a raging , at times intoxicating , 12 cylinder economy .
It demanded vigilant/consistent regulation , compassion for the disenfranchised , and the periodic display of a necessary sacrifice that allowed for the long term health of our society at the expense of short term whims .
The declaration of those ideals and the near moral collapse of this country falls squarely on the lap of Trump supporters as opposed to Trump himself , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ objective negative function.
” Like fire , floods and earthquakes , it destroys , and only destroys , by its very nature .
Without prejudice .
It is Trump voters , particularly those who would re-elect him who bear the blame .
For the undeniable and colossal destruction of everything that matters to us as Americans that can not be merely monetized .
Did you catch that , Trump supporters ?
You ’ re need for stupid things like jobs and financial security are putting the moral health of our nation at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” that is espoused by avowed leftists who want to impose their leftism on the rest of us with an iron fist .
These folks would criminalize dissenting speech , and ban guns because they can say what they like while hiding behind their personal security detail .
They lecture about an impending “ climate catastrophe ” and how “ immoral ” a border wall is as they jet around the world and live in luxurious mansions behind high walls .
These Hollywood “ betters ” have lived in a leftist bubble where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Harvey Weinstein ’ s office .
There ’ s a reason that the “ casting couch ” has been a known entity since the earliest days of Hollywood .
Yes , the man that spent 40 years on-screen rubbing elbows with Woody Allen , Harvey Weinstein , and Kevin Spacey — he was even listed in Jeffrey Epstein ’ s infamous black book — while turning a blind eye to their predation , is lecturing the rest of us on our morals .
Alec Baldwin told PBS that he had heard rumors about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anything specific .
Pardon me if I ’ m not taking the moral preening by Alec Baldwin very seriously .
He ’ s just one more actor following the leftist script instead of thinking for himself .
After all , that ’ s what actors do .
We ’ ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with a less than stellar past , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .
Don ’ t let Big Tech pre-chew your news .
Subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here : If you ’ re still on Facebook , check out our ClashBriefing page .
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness .

Actor John Wilkes Booth clearly wasn’t a fan of the first Republican President and thus has been with actors and GOP presidents ever since.
Your moral betters in Hollywood have made it very clear that they truly despise President Trump. In 2016, they appeared in ads telling you to vote and which candidate was the “correct” choice. They fearmongered, they begged, but they were wrong.
Despite what you think of Donald J. Trump as a human being, what his tweets are like, and how he has treated women in the past, he has done one helluva good job as President.
And the left hates it. In just the past week, they’ve outdone themselves. If you thought the partisan impeachment-in-search-of-a-crime was bad, we’ve just witnessed Trump Derangement Syndrome push Democrats and their Media(D) sycophants to come running to praise an Iranian terrorist to “own Trump.” It’s embarrassing.
But, the Hollywood pretty people are absolutely despising the way that President Trump has broken our entire democracy — at least that’s what they claim he has done. Yes, the people that want to get rid of the Electoral College, erase Constitutional amendments, disregard immigration law, cede control of our country to the United Nations, and criminalize actually living out either Christian or Jewish faith, are upset that President Trump is “upsetting the norms.”
Alec Baldwin, who won an Emmy for his Saturday Night Live appearances as President Trump, is now blaming Trump supporters for the “moral collapse” of the country.
Yes, really.
In a tweet thread on Monday, Baldwin wrote:
American democracy has always been a struggle between the misaligned protections of specific freedoms and a raging, at times intoxicating, 12 cylinder economy.
It demanded vigilant/consistent regulation, compassion for the disenfranchised, and the periodic display of a necessary sacrifice that allowed for the long term health of our society at the expense of short term whims.
The declaration of those ideals and the near moral collapse of this country falls squarely on the lap of Trump supporters as opposed to Trump himself, who is merely what psychology labels the “objective negative function.” Like fire, floods and earthquakes, it destroys, and only destroys, by its very nature. Without prejudice.
It is Trump voters, particularly those who would re-elect him who bear the blame.
For the undeniable and colossal destruction of everything that matters to us as Americans that cannot be merely monetized.
2- …and the periodic display of a necessary sacrifice that allowed for the long term health of our society at the expense of short term whims.
The desecration of those ideals and the near moral collapse of this country falls squarely in the lap of Trump’s supporters, as opposed — HABFoundation (@ABFalecbaldwin) January 13, 2020
3- …as opposed to Trump himself, who is merely what psychology labels the “objective negative function.” Like fire, floods and earthquakes, it destroys, and only destroys, by its very nature. Without prejudice.
It is Trump voters, particularly those who would re-elect him… — HABFoundation (@ABFalecbaldwin) January 13, 2020
4- …who bear the blame.
For the undeniable and colossal destruction of everything that matters to us as Americans that cannot be merely monetized. — HABFoundation (@ABFalecbaldwin) January 13, 2020
Did you catch that, Trump supporters? You’re need for stupid things like jobs and financial security are putting the moral health of our nation at risk. The same “moral health” that is espoused by avowed leftists who want to impose their leftism on the rest of us with an iron fist.
These folks would criminalize dissenting speech, and ban guns because they can say what they like while hiding behind their personal security detail. They lecture about an impending “climate catastrophe” and how “immoral” a border wall is as they jet around the world and live in luxurious mansions behind high walls.
These Hollywood “betters” have lived in a leftist bubble where women were knowingly used and discarded in Harvey Weinstein’s office. There’s a reason that the “casting couch” has been a known entity since the earliest days of Hollywood.
Yes, the man that spent 40 years on-screen rubbing elbows with Woody Allen, Harvey Weinstein, and Kevin Spacey — he was even listed in Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous black book — while turning a blind eye to their predation, is lecturing the rest of us on our morals.
Alec Baldwin told PBS that he had heard rumors about Harvey Weinstein but didn’t know anything specific.
Told you everyone knew. No one cared. Men ran the show. Women toed the line. No more. #ROSEARMY https://t.co/ixjnndLnEH — rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) November 4, 2017
Pardon me if I’m not taking the moral preening by Alec Baldwin very seriously. He’s just one more actor following the leftist script instead of thinking for himself. After all, that’s what actors do.
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.
Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news. Subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Become a Clash Insider! Sign up for our free email newslettaer, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
If you’re still on Facebook, check out our ClashBriefing page.
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness.
Stay Rowdy!


clashdaily--2020-01-15--Project Veritas: Bernie’s Sanders’ Staffer Round 2, Kyle Jurek, Self-Described Anarcho-Communist

Kyle Jurek , Field Organizer for Bernie describes himself as being ‘ as far left as you can go ’ .
Yesterday ’ s release covered his violence .
Today builds on that… there are many others like him .
“ If you can ’ t handle me at my most communist , then you don ’ t deserve me at my most anarchist.
” He is describing himself as further left than the Democratic Socialists of America .
And there are plenty more like him in this campaign .
He even names names .
In his mind , anyone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go to the gulags where they can learn to be a ‘ Comrade ’ .
He actually admired Stalin for doing that .
Trending : WATCH : Project Veritas Video Exposes Bernie 's Campaign Organizer As PRO-Gulag And PRO-Reeducation This is the same Kyle who stopped himself halfway through saying ‘ eliminating ’ people that were insidious to the state , and replacing that word with ‘ removing ’ .
He transitioned directly from there go Gulags .
He LOVES himself an authoritarian police state .
The same d-bag who spoke approvingly of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ beaches , and talked about dragging MSNBC members out by their hair and setting them on fire .
Here is the short ‘ Teaser film ’ version of the video .
The full-length follow-up will be added when it becomes available .
Updated : the full-length version is now available : One example of what ’ s in it .
Anderson Cooper was asked about the video that dropped yesterday .
Curiously , he had no comment .
By the way… Gulags are NOT the utopian human work camps this extremist is describing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gulag survivor and author of Gulag Archipeligo , Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn .
Or he could familiarize himself with data like this , widely available across the internet : According to Soviet and NKVD records unearthed in 1993 , the number is 1,053,829 people who died in the Gulags , or state-run forced labor-prison camps in the USSR from 1934–53 ( Stalin era ) .
However , going back to 1921 ( not included in the Stalin era ) until 1953 the number is 1.7 million people dead , of which there were 799,455 executions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ natural causes ” from either malnutrition , disease , hypothermia etc .
Most Western historians differ on the death toll , and the numbers I just gave you are those acknowledged by the Soviets .
Most historians find these numbers to be credible however the death toll by some is in the several millions , as there could have been many more deaths not reported by the NKVD .
— Source : Quora Here is the first of the series .
And if we ’ ve learned anything about how Project Veritas rolls @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ass there are plenty more videos coming .
WATCH : Project Veritas Video Exposes Bernie ’ s Campaign Organizer As PRO-Gulag And PRO-Reeducation

Kyle Jurek, Field Organizer for Bernie describes himself as being ‘as far left as you can go’. Yesterday’s release covered his violence. Today builds on that… there are many others like him.
“If you can’t handle me at my most communist, then you don’t deserve me at my most anarchist.”
He is describing himself as further left than the Democratic Socialists of America. And there are plenty more like him in this campaign. He even names names.
In his mind, anyone who disagrees with his political agenda should go to the gulags where they can learn to be a ‘Comrade’. He actually admired Stalin for doing that.
Holly Hallman, Sanders Field Organizer thinks Kyle is ‘fabulous’.
This is the same Kyle who stopped himself halfway through saying ‘eliminating’ people that were insidious to the state, and replacing that word with ‘removing’. He transitioned directly from there go Gulags.
He LOVES himself an authoritarian police state.
The same d-bag who spoke approvingly of Cuba killing ‘reactionaries’ on the beaches, and talked about dragging MSNBC members out by their hair and setting them on fire.
Here is the short ‘Teaser film’ version of the video.
BREAKING: Bernie Staffer Kyle Jurek “I’m an Anarcho-communist…I'm as far left as you can possibly get…There’s a lot of me’s in the @BernieSanders campaign…” "He's(Kyle Jurek) fabulous" – Holly Hallman, Bernie Iowa Field Organizer PART 2 12:00PM: https://t.co/BFGnoCwkvF pic.twitter.com/65xhItTprD — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) January 15, 2020
The full-length follow-up will be added when it becomes available.
Updated: the full-length version is now available:
BREAKING: #Expose2020 – PART II: Sanders 2020 Organizer “There Are Things That Are More Important Than the Rule of Law in the USA”; Declares His Views Are Shared by Many Others Within the Campaign; Secret Service Notified Over POTUS Assassination Concernpic.twitter.com/qAXxMkRU9i — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) January 15, 2020
One example of what’s in it.
BREAKING: @BernieSanders 2020 staffer "In Fact…Four of the organizers in this office…Justin, Me, Derek, Danielle, Jessica, are all definitely further left than Democratic Socialists…" #Expose2020 pic.twitter.com/driWZBxgtu — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) January 15, 2020
Anderson Cooper was asked about the video that dropped yesterday. Curiously, he had no comment.
Outside the #DemDebate Anderson Cooper is asked by @allidoisowen if he will comment on the @PVeritas_Action #Expose2020 tape and the calls for political violence by @BernieSanders staffer Kyle Jurek. Cooper refused to comment. pic.twitter.com/HA3UKtcXrU — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) January 15, 2020
By the way… Gulags are NOT the utopian human work camps this extremist is describing. He could read Nobel Peace Prize-winning Gulag survivor and author of Gulag Archipeligo, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. Or he could familiarize himself with data like this, widely available across the internet:
According to Soviet and NKVD records unearthed in 1993, the number is 1,053,829 people who died in the Gulags, or state-run forced labor-prison camps in the USSR from 1934–53 (Stalin era). However, going back to 1921 (not included in the Stalin era) until 1953 the number is 1.7 million people dead, of which there were 799,455 executions, while the rest died of “natural causes” from either malnutrition, disease, hypothermia etc. Most Western historians differ on the death toll, and the numbers I just gave you are those acknowledged by the Soviets. Most historians find these numbers to be credible however the death toll by some is in the several millions, as there could have been many more deaths not reported by the NKVD. — Source: Quora
Here is the first of the series.
And if we’ve learned anything about how Project Veritas rolls these out, you can bet your ass there are plenty more videos coming.
WATCH: Project Veritas Video Exposes Bernie’s Campaign Organizer As PRO-Gulag And PRO-Reeducation


clashdaily--2020-01-15--Is The Church Driving Men Away?

Is The Church Driving Men Away?

The church wasn ’ t always filled with thumb-sucking pajama-boys .
We were once lead by bold men of courage who would rather be devoured by lions than back down from the gospel .
Something ’ s changed along the way… and it ’ s not for the better .
If you ’ ve ever looked around on a Sunday morning and began to wonder if you ’ d taken a wrong turn and accidentally stepped onto the set of a feminine hygiene commercial , then you know what we ’ re talking about .
Whatever happened to the moxy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fearless in the beginning ?
Trending : WATCH : Project Veritas Video Exposes Bernie 's Campaign Organizer As PRO-Gulag And PRO-Reeducation These two minutes of spiritual adrenalin tackle that issue head-on .
Are you up for it ?
Are you SURE ?
Did you love that ?
You bet you did !
There ’ s lots more where that came from .
Check out ClashRadio.com for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg .
Also , don ’ t miss out on this : Pussification : The Effeminization Of The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog , ClashDaily.com , has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity .
That is , if the man-child will put down his frappuccino ; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome .
Buy Now : Pussification : The Effeminization Of The American Male

The church wasn’t always filled with thumb-sucking pajama-boys. We were once lead by bold men of courage who would rather be devoured by lions than back down from the gospel.
Something’s changed along the way… and it’s not for the better.
If you’ve ever looked around on a Sunday morning and began to wonder if you’d taken a wrong turn and accidentally stepped onto the set of a feminine hygiene commercial, then you know what we’re talking about.
Whatever happened to the moxy that made the Church so strong and fearless in the beginning?
These two minutes of spiritual adrenalin tackle that issue head-on. Are you up for it?
Are you SURE?
Did you love that? You bet you did!
There’s lots more where that came from.
Check out ClashRadio.com for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg.
Also, don’t miss out on this:
Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now: Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male


clashdaily--2020-01-15--NAVARRO: Trump Gained UNPRECEDENTED Concessions From China In This Trade Deal

One of the big promises that Trump made in 2016 was that he would rebalance our trade deals with nations including China .
He ’ s taken a big step in that direction .
Peter Navarro , Assistant to the President , and Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy joined Hugh Hewitt to explain just what made this new trade deal so different from the status quo as we had it before .
We gain some insights not only into the President ’ s philosophy relating to trade and national security , we find out what steps have been made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and ( crucially ) what enforcement mechanisms have been put in place .
Note : anything in bold is not in the original text .
Trending : WATCH : Project Veritas Video Exposes Bernie 's Campaign Organizer As PRO-Gulag And PRO-Reeducation We join the interview already in progress… HH : …while I hate the tariffs on our allies like France , that ’ s for another day , I want to talk about this China deal , because tariffs in the context of China are national security policy , not economic policy .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Peter Navarro , that this is not about economics , it ’ s about national security ?
PN : So the more subtle framing of that , which is kind of a foundation of the whole Trump administration , is that economic security is national security .
So the two are ineluctably intertwined .
And too many times in the past , our leaders have been willing to sacrifice our economy to gain national security benefits .
What this president understands is if we cede the technology high ground to China by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we will not only be weaker economically , but also be weaker from the national security point of view .
So I think we ’ re on the same page on that , but I see the two as one and the same , and perhaps that ’ s where our disagreement might lie .
HH : Well , our disagreement is primarily geographical .
I don ’ t want to have tariffs on France , but I want you to continue to hammer the Chinese , and that ’ s where I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I ’ ve read the New York Times story about it .
I haven ’ t read the agreement , yet .
Michael Pillsbury was on last hour , one of my great experts on China .
I quote him .
“ The Chinese are addicted to technology theft.
” I agree with that .
I know you agree with that .
How does this agreement break that addiction ?
PN : Let ’ s distinguish between intellectual property theft and force technology transfer , which are the two big things in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ technology transfer , Hugh , is a particularly virulent kind of form of economic aggression .
China ’ s always promised this 1.3 billion consumer market , lured our companies over there , but in exchange for that market access , they ’ ve had to surrender their technology .
Totally against the rules of the WTO .
We were never able to enforce that rule .
In this agreement , we will be able to enforce the rule , and that critically , the most important part of phase one is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 90 day clock .
If we ’ ve got , if a company ’ s got a problem , they come to Lighthizer , who ’ s the United States Trade Representative .
It gets adjudicated in 90 days .
And if we don ’ t like the result , then we get to take measures to deal with that , and China can ’ t retaliate .
That ’ s what they ’ re signing today .
So that ’ s… HH : By the way , that ’ s huge .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ huge , and it will be one of the great feathers in the President ’ s cap .
HH : But that ’ s 90 days down .
Let me pause for a moment , and by the way , Lighthizer ’ s from Ashtabula , Ohio .
That ’ s why he ’ s effective , Peter .
PN : I love the guy .
He is the best trade representative we ever had .
But I don ’ t want his head to get swollen , because we ’ ve only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So it ’ s not… HH : He ’ s from Ashtabula .
He ’ s just tough .
Just understand the winters in Ashtabula make you tough .
Now let me talk to you about the fact that American companies , though , are still subject to what Michael Pillsbury called mafia-like tactics .
Were you disappointed that the NBA caved when China threatened them over the comments of the Houston Rockets general manager ?
PN : I was gloriously amused watching people like LeBron James and Steve Kerr and all these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of our president , and they folded like a cheap tent .
I mean , it was like you ’ ve got to be kidding .
And you know , the only one who really spoke up , I thought beautifully , was Shaquille O ’ Neal , who I always loved when he was back in L.A. Yeah , I mean that was a disgrace , Hugh .
That was an absolute disgrace the way those people behaved .
[ …some light banter about the ‘ woke ’ NBA ’ s servile @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by a reference to the President listening to Hugh Hewitt ’ s show .
… ] HH : Oh , good .
I ’ m glad he is listening .
Tell him he can come on anytime .
And I know that he keeps saying he ’ s going to , but we haven ’ t seen him , yet .
Peter , the reason I bring up the NBA is because of what Pillsbury said .
They are the most easily understood example of the mafia-like threat that the PRC exercises over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And it was brought up specifically by the , Michael Pillsbury that GM suffers under the same threat that does the NBA .
What are we going to do about that ?
If they can crush companies , if they can force the NBA and LeBron James to their knees , they can do it to a small company in America , can ’ t they ?
PN : So that ’ s what the enforcement mechanism is all about .
That ’ s the ultimate protection here , Hugh .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what Lighthizer has said in this , because it ’ s really interesting .
I mean , he says this deal hinges basically on what happens in China .
And he distinguishes between a group of reformers in China who legitimately know that their economic model is a disaster and needs to change .
That ’ s represented by Liu He , the vice premier , who will be in town today signing that deal .
But there ’ s also the hawks , the mercantilist , basically Chinese Communist Party protectionist , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way to rise up while the Chinese economy is on the backs of everybody else .
And so there ’ s going to be a struggle there .
And the good news here , Hugh , is that if the mercantilists in China win , we ’ ve got our tariffs , and we ’ ve got our tough stance .
If the reformers win , then we ’ ve got a deal that works for the whole world .
So this is the best you can do .
The President has changed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mean , I don ’ t know how long you ’ ve talked about China in the light , in the clear light of day what they do to this country .
But it ’ s been an epiphany for a lot of folks in this country .
And in the last three years , the attitudes on China has completely changed .
HH : Oh , no , it is the great achievement in foreign policy to have brought clarity to the relationship between the PRC and the U.S… .
So to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ security as intrinsically intertwined and sees the defense or failure to defend one as the failure to defend both .
Does anyone REALLY think Hillary would have even ATTEMPTED to get this done , let alone have pushed hard to pull some real concessions out of officials in China ?
While the Democrats are busy trying to figure out how to fleece Americans for everything they own , Trump is giving American companies a fighting chance in the markets , where R & D and innovations will NOT be stolen by rivals in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ process .

One of the big promises that Trump made in 2016 was that he would rebalance our trade deals with nations including China. He’s taken a big step in that direction.
Peter Navarro, Assistant to the President, and Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy joined Hugh Hewitt to explain just what made this new trade deal so different from the status quo as we had it before.
We gain some insights not only into the President’s philosophy relating to trade and national security, we find out what steps have been made to secure the interests of Americans, and (crucially) what enforcement mechanisms have been put in place.
Note: anything in bold is not in the original text.
We join the interview already in progress…
HH: …while I hate the tariffs on our allies like France, that’s for another day, I want to talk about this China deal, because tariffs in the context of China are national security policy, not economic policy. Do you agree with me on that, Peter Navarro, that this is not about economics, it’s about national security?
PN: So the more subtle framing of that, which is kind of a foundation of the whole Trump administration, is that economic security is national security. So the two are ineluctably intertwined. And too many times in the past, our leaders have been willing to sacrifice our economy to gain national security benefits. What this president understands is if we cede the technology high ground to China by allowing them to attack us economically, we will not only be weaker economically, but also be weaker from the national security point of view. So I think we’re on the same page on that, but I see the two as one and the same, and perhaps that’s where our disagreement might lie.
HH: Well, our disagreement is primarily geographical. I don’t want to have tariffs on France, but I want you to continue to hammer the Chinese, and that’s where I want to turn to the agreement today. I’ve read the New York Times story about it. I haven’t read the agreement, yet. Michael Pillsbury was on last hour, one of my great experts on China. I quote him. “The Chinese are addicted to technology theft.” I agree with that. I know you agree with that. How does this agreement break that addiction?
PN: Let’s distinguish between intellectual property theft and force technology transfer, which are the two big things in this phase one deal. The force technology transfer, Hugh, is a particularly virulent kind of form of economic aggression. China’s always promised this 1.3 billion consumer market, lured our companies over there, but in exchange for that market access, they’ve had to surrender their technology. Totally against the rules of the WTO. We were never able to enforce that rule. In this agreement, we will be able to enforce the rule, and that critically, the most important part of phase one is the enforcement mechanism. It’s a 90 day clock. If we’ve got, if a company’s got a problem, they come to Lighthizer, who’s the United States Trade Representative. It gets adjudicated in 90 days. And if we don’t like the result, then we get to take measures to deal with that, and China can’t retaliate. That’s what they’re signing today. So that’s…
HH: By the way, that’s huge. If it works, it’s huge, and it will be one of the great feathers in the President’s cap.
PN: It’s huge. It’s huge.
HH: But that’s 90 days down. Let me pause for a moment, and by the way, Lighthizer’s from Ashtabula, Ohio. That’s why he’s effective, Peter.
PN: I love the guy. He is the best trade representative we ever had. But I don’t want his head to get swollen, because we’ve only had a trade representative since 1960. So it’s not…
HH: He’s from Ashtabula. He’s just tough. Just understand the winters in Ashtabula make you tough. Now let me talk to you about the fact that American companies, though, are still subject to what Michael Pillsbury called mafia-like tactics. Were you disappointed that the NBA caved when China threatened them over the comments of the Houston Rockets general manager?
PN: I was gloriously amused watching people like LeBron James and Steve Kerr and all these people who are just so pious critics of our president, and they folded like a cheap tent. I mean, it was like you’ve got to be kidding. And you know, the only one who really spoke up, I thought beautifully, was Shaquille O’Neal, who I always loved when he was back in L.A. Yeah, I mean that was a disgrace, Hugh. That was an absolute disgrace the way those people behaved.
[…some light banter about the ‘woke’ NBA’s servile capitulation to China’s authoritarianism followed by a reference to the President listening to Hugh Hewitt’s show. …]
HH: Oh, good. I’m glad he is listening. Tell him he can come on anytime. And I know that he keeps saying he’s going to, but we haven’t seen him, yet. Peter, the reason I bring up the NBA is because of what Pillsbury said. They are the most easily understood example of the mafia-like threat that the PRC exercises over every American company doing business in China. And it was brought up specifically by the, Michael Pillsbury that GM suffers under the same threat that does the NBA. What are we going to do about that? If they can crush companies, if they can force the NBA and LeBron James to their knees, they can do it to a small company in America, can’t they?
PN: So that’s what the enforcement mechanism is all about. That’s the ultimate protection here, Hugh. But let me talk a little bit about what Lighthizer has said in this, because it’s really interesting. I mean, he says this deal hinges basically on what happens in China. And he distinguishes between a group of reformers in China who legitimately know that their economic model is a disaster and needs to change. That’s represented by Liu He, the vice premier, who will be in town today signing that deal. But there’s also the hawks, the mercantilist, basically Chinese Communist Party protectionist, mercantilist, who think that the only way to rise up while the Chinese economy is on the backs of everybody else. And so there’s going to be a struggle there. And the good news here, Hugh, is that if the mercantilists in China win, we’ve got our tariffs, and we’ve got our tough stance. If the reformers win, then we’ve got a deal that works for the whole world. So this is the best you can do. The President has changed the whole discussion about China. I mean, I don’t know how long you’ve talked about China in the light, in the clear light of day what they do to this country. But it’s been an epiphany for a lot of folks in this country. And in the last three years, the attitudes on China has completely changed.
HH: Oh, no, it is the great achievement in foreign policy to have brought clarity to the relationship between the PRC and the U.S….
PN: It is
End Transcript. — Source: HughHewitt
So to conclude, Trump sees economic and national security as intrinsically intertwined and sees the defense or failure to defend one as the failure to defend both.
Does anyone REALLY think Hillary would have even ATTEMPTED to get this done, let alone have pushed hard to pull some real concessions out of officials in China?
While the Democrats are busy trying to figure out how to fleece Americans for everything they own, Trump is giving American companies a fighting chance in the markets, where R&D and innovations will NOT be stolen by rivals in China, killing jobs here in the process.


clashdaily--2020-01-15--DISGUSTING: House Democrats Block Vote Supporting Iranian Protesters

Trump Derangement Syndrome is real folks .
Rather than support Iranians protesting for their freedom , they would ( effectively ) side with Iran ’ s regime .
How jacked up does your anti-American , anti-Freedom have to get to take you to this point ?
This is the same party , after all , that claims to love protesters of every stripe .
Just not the freedom-loving ones in totalitarian Hellscapes like Iran .
The Iranian people are ‘ speaking Truth to power ’ in a state where doing so can get you jailed or shot .
They are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down a passenger plane filled with nearly 200 people , including children .
There is no excuse for the killing of everyone on board that plane , and the oppressed people of Iran know it .
They are tearing down pictures of Soleimani .
They are showing respect to symbols of America and Israel ( that ’ s a big deal in Iran ) , and they are denouncing in the strongest terms their own country ’ s despotic leadership .
In looking for the tweet above to quantify the danger these protesters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that really drive home the point of what ’ s happening right now in Iran .
We ’ ll add them after describing the actual resolution Democrats were opposing .
In light of all this , and more , Rep Kevin McCarthy quite naturally put forward a resolution in support of the protesters .
Democrats promptly blocked it .
Consideration and a vote on House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy ’ s resolution was blocked because Democrats advanced the previous question , by a vote of 226-191 .
The resolution would have condemned the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ citizens who were protesting their government , as well as condemned the Government of Iran for shooting down Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 , killing 176 people .
In addition , the resolution ; “ ( 3 ) condemns the Government of Iran for repeatedly lying to its people and to the world about its responsibility for the downing of Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 ; ( 4 ) calls on the Government of Iran to— ( A ) refrain from the use of violence ; and ( B ) protect the rights @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; and ( 5 ) supports the protestors in Iran , their demands for accountability , and their desire for the Government of Iran to respect freedom and human rights.
” Source : DailyCaller They won ’ t touch that issue with a 10′ pole .
Weird , eh ?
When Antifa attacks journalists and tourists , the Squad will gladly help fundraise for bail money .
( Which , in light of the latest Project Veritas video exposing Bernie Sanders Iowa organizer , that suddenly makes a TON of sense . )
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ regime in ( first ) Venezuela and ( now ) Iran ?
The Democrats absolutely will not stand for it .
They will refuse ANYTHING that could possibly put Trump or his policies in a positive light , even when that means refusing to do the RIGHT thing .
Even Amnesty International was ( finally ) shamed into speaking up about it .
But absolutely Bupkis from the Democrats .
Here ’ s a quick recap of what the Iranians are dealing with : Democrats have zero — ZERO — claim to any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and suffering after this disgraceful display .
And a party with priorities like THIS wants Americans to give them back the Presidency ?
The Presidency ?
Oh , please , we wouldn ’ t trust them to run the Tilt-a-Whirl at the fair .

Trump Derangement Syndrome is real folks. Rather than support Iranians protesting for their freedom, they would (effectively) side with Iran’s regime.
How jacked up does your anti-American, anti-Freedom have to get to take you to this point?
This is the same party, after all, that claims to love protesters of every stripe. Just not the freedom-loving ones in totalitarian Hellscapes like Iran.
The Iranian people are ‘speaking Truth to power’ in a state where doing so can get you jailed or shot. They are doing so in response to Iran shooting down a passenger plane filled with nearly 200 people, including children.
?? Iran protests in past two months:
1,500 protesters killed by regime
4,800 Injured
7,000 arrested ?? Reaction from U.N. Human Rights Council:
0 resolutions
0 urgent sessions
0 commissions of inquiry Why, @mbachelet? — Hillel Neuer (@HillelNeuer) January 13, 2020
There is no excuse for the killing of everyone on board that plane, and the oppressed people of Iran know it. They are tearing down pictures of Soleimani. They are showing respect to symbols of America and Israel (that’s a big deal in Iran), and they are denouncing in the strongest terms their own country’s despotic leadership.
In looking for the tweet above to quantify the danger these protesters face, we came across several others that really drive home the point of what’s happening right now in Iran. We’ll add them after describing the actual resolution Democrats were opposing.
In light of all this, and more, Rep Kevin McCarthy quite naturally put forward a resolution in support of the protesters. Democrats promptly blocked it.
LR @RepMcCaul: "It is a resolution, telling the Iranian people and the protesters in #Iran that we support them, that the American people have their back. Democrats would not allow a vote on this resolution.” pic.twitter.com/YeMXvFeNSP — House Foreign Affairs GOP (@HouseForeignGOP) January 14, 2020
Consideration and a vote on House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s resolution was blocked because Democrats advanced the previous question, by a vote of 226-191. The resolution would have condemned the Government of Iran for killing 1,500 Iranian citizens who were protesting their government, as well as condemned the Government of Iran for shooting down Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752, killing 176 people. In addition, the resolution; “(3) condemns the Government of Iran for repeatedly lying to its people and to the world about its responsibility for the downing of Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752; (4) calls on the Government of Iran to— (A) refrain from the use of violence; and (B) protect the rights of freedom of expression and peaceful assembly; and (5) supports the protestors in Iran, their demands for accountability, and their desire for the Government of Iran to respect freedom and human rights.”
Source: DailyCaller
They won’t touch that issue with a 10′ pole. Weird, eh?
When Antifa attacks journalists and tourists, the Squad will gladly help fundraise for bail money. (Which, in light of the latest Project Veritas video exposing Bernie Sanders Iowa organizer, that suddenly makes a TON of sense.)
But people standing up to an oppressive regime in (first) Venezuela and (now) Iran? The Democrats absolutely will not stand for it.
They will refuse ANYTHING that could possibly put Trump or his policies in a positive light, even when that means refusing to do the RIGHT thing.
Even Amnesty International was (finally) shamed into speaking up about it. But absolutely Bupkis from the Democrats.
Here’s a quick recap of what the Iranians are dealing with:
“Soleimani was a murderer, his Leader is also a murderer!”
“Soleimani was a murderer, his Leader is also a murderer!”
“Soleimani was a murderer, his Leader is also a murderer!”
“Soleimani was a murderer, his Leader is also a murderer!” Bravest people in the world. pic.twitter.com/xjCav4reQi — Hillel Neuer (@HillelNeuer) January 11, 2020
It may be hard to believe but I have experienced it personally!
When u r protesting peacefully but suddenly get attacked by several huge men with batons & tasers, d 1st thought in your mind – even before feeling the pain – is: “Where does this hatred come from?”#IranProtests2020 pic.twitter.com/8XoEwxU2WD — Maryam shariatmadari (@Maryamshariatm) January 14, 2020
In my interview with @euronews 1) Many Iranians think that the Revolutionary Guards are an Iranian version of ISIS. I hear this commonly from the people who contact me from inside Iran. 2) The regime had to admit to downing the plane because there were foreign nationals in it pic.twitter.com/sMA96lip2x — Masih Alinejad ? (@AlinejadMasih) January 14, 2020
Peaceful protesters in Iran faced tear gas and live fire this week. Here's how they described it: https://t.co/YNC4jLwMa7. #IranProtests2020 pic.twitter.com/pJi9CwPNVx — IranHumanRights.org (@ICHRI) January 14, 2020
The New York Times just called Iranian President Hassan Rouhani—whose regime just massacred 1,500 of his own people for protesting, and helped Assad murder 500,000 Syrian men, women and children—"a moderate."https://t.co/UhNcX3BG3H — Hillel Neuer (@HillelNeuer) January 15, 2020
Democrats have zero — ZERO — claim to any moral high ground in terms of victims and suffering after this disgraceful display.
And a party with priorities like THIS wants Americans to give them back the Presidency? The Presidency? Oh, please, we wouldn’t trust them to run the Tilt-a-Whirl at the fair.


clashdaily--2020-01-16--Wolf Blitzer Interview Of Mike Pence In Israel Nixed Because CNN Is ‘All Impeachment, All Of The Tim

Wolf Blitzer Interview Of Mike Pence In Israel Nixed Because CNN Is ‘All Impeachment, All Of The Time’

The exclusive interview was to mark the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz where Blitzer ’ s paternal grandparents were killed .
At a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise worldwide , it seems like an important moment to commemorate , especially by someone who has lost family members there .
In a 2018 interview , Blitzer spoke emotionally about his own family history .
While ripping the “ family separation ” border policy that has been in place for quite some time which the Trump administration has been following , Blitzer said , “ My grandparents were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but two of his brothers and two of his sisters were killed .
They weren ’ t separated to go to another facility .
They were separated to die.
” The White House had offered the exclusive interview to Blitzer scheduled for next Thursday at the World Holocaust Forum where world leaders were gathering to remember the Holocaust .
Trending : Is The Church Driving Men Away ?
Page Six reports that Wolf Blitzer had jumped at the opportunity when it was offered by the White House .
However , CNN ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in and banned Blitzer from leaving the country because of the “ urgent ” partisan impeachment of President Trump .
Now that Speaker Pelosi has finally signed the Articles of Impeachment , appointed the managers , and delivered them to the Senate , Blitzer will be needed to lead the coverage of the upcoming Senate Impeachment trial .
The source said that the cable news network ’ s anti-Trump bias is keeping them from broadcasting a sympathetic interview to remember the Holocaust , and the coverage is going to be “ all impeachment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week .
A CNN source said : “ Wolf really wanted to do the Pence interview personally .
He cares deeply because of his family background , which is why Wolf was offered it by the White House .
But Zucker stepped in and said Wolf isn ’ t going anywhere because the network will be ‘ all impeachment , all of the time ’ next week .
CNN ’ s anti-Trump bias is so intense , they can ’ t even broadcast a sympathetic interview for Holocaust remembrance.
” Dozens of world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including Vladimir Putin and Emmanuel Macron .
A separate CNN source confirmed : “ Wolf was offered the interview .
We declined because the Senate impeachment trial is next week and Wolf will be leading our coverage .
So he can ’ t be out of the country .
And frankly , we wouldn ’ t be in a position to send any of our anchors on an overseas trip taking them off the air for days next week when the Senate trial will be underway.
” They can go on about being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re refusing an exclusive interview to commemorate the liberation of Auschwitz at a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise because you ’ d rather laugh at the supposed demise of President Trump , you should perhaps check your priorities .
Where Trump Derangement Syndrome determines what is broadcast .

The exclusive interview was to mark the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz where Blitzer’s paternal grandparents were killed.
At a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise worldwide, it seems like an important moment to commemorate, especially by someone who has lost family members there.
In a 2018 interview, Blitzer spoke emotionally about his own family history. While ripping the “family separation” border policy that has been in place for quite some time which the Trump administration has been following, Blitzer said, “My grandparents were murdered at Auschwitz. My dad survived, but two of his brothers and two of his sisters were killed. They weren’t separated to go to another facility. They were separated to die.”
The White House had offered the exclusive interview to Blitzer scheduled for next Thursday at the World Holocaust Forum where world leaders were gathering to remember the Holocaust.
Page Six reports that Wolf Blitzer had jumped at the opportunity when it was offered by the White House. However, CNN’s head honcho, Jeff Zucker stepped in and banned Blitzer from leaving the country because of the “urgent” partisan impeachment of President Trump. Now that Speaker Pelosi has finally signed the Articles of Impeachment, appointed the managers, and delivered them to the Senate, Blitzer will be needed to lead the coverage of the upcoming Senate Impeachment trial.
The source said that the cable news network’s anti-Trump bias is keeping them from broadcasting a sympathetic interview to remember the Holocaust, and the coverage is going to be “all impeachment, all of the time” next week.
A CNN source said: “Wolf really wanted to do the Pence interview personally. He cares deeply because of his family background, which is why Wolf was offered it by the White House. But Zucker stepped in and said Wolf isn’t going anywhere because the network will be ‘all impeachment, all of the time’ next week. CNN’s anti-Trump bias is so intense, they can’t even broadcast a sympathetic interview for Holocaust remembrance.” Dozens of world leaders are expected at the forum, including Vladimir Putin and Emmanuel Macron. A separate CNN source confirmed: “Wolf was offered the interview. We declined because the Senate impeachment trial is next week and Wolf will be leading our coverage. So he can’t be out of the country. And frankly, we wouldn’t be in a position to send any of our anchors on an overseas trip taking them off the air for days next week when the Senate trial will be underway.” Source: Page Six
They can go on about being “Facts First” but when you’re refusing an exclusive interview to commemorate the liberation of Auschwitz at a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise because you’d rather laugh at the supposed demise of President Trump, you should perhaps check your priorities.
This is CNN.
Where Trump Derangement Syndrome determines what is broadcast.
Great work, Zucker.


clashdaily--2020-01-16--5 Key Takeaways From Trump’s Historic China Trade Deal

Trump promised to fix the broken trade deal with China .
Here are five specific ways he has made good on that promise .
What ’ s so different and so good about Trump ’ s new trade deal with China ?
Here are Five specific categories .
Intellectual property is now protected under this trade deal in ways that it was not previously .
Additionally , there are remedies available to companies who believe their IP rights are being violated .
Trending : Is The Church Driving Men Away ?
Compared to the 2017 baseline , China is committing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by no less than $ 200 Billion .
China will no longer force companies to involuntarily give their technologies to the Chinese Government .
Any transaction will be voluntary and market-based .
Trump campaigned on China engaging in unfair currency manipulation practices .
This deal gives a mechanism and some leverage that can be used against China if they go back to such practices .
American financial service companies have wanted access to Chinese markets for the longest time .
They will now have it .
“ China shall allow U.S. financial services @ @ @ @ @ @ @ licenses that would permit them to acquire non-performing loans directly from Chinese banks , beginning with provincial licenses .
When additional national licenses are granted , China shall treat U.S. financial services suppliers on a non-discriminatory basis with Chinese suppliers , including with respect to the granting of such licenses.
” “ No later than April 1 , 2020 , China shall remove the foreign equity cap in the life , pension , and health insurance sectors and allow wholly U.S.-owned insurance companies to participate in these sectors .
China affirms that there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S.-owned insurance companies established in China to wholly own insurance asset management companies in China.
” “ No later than April 1 , 2020 , China shall eliminate foreign equity limits and allow wholly U.S.-owned services suppliers to participate in the securities , fund management , and futures sectors.
” “ China affirms that a wholly U.S.-owned credit rating services supplier has been allowed to rate domestic bonds sold to domestic and international investors , including for the interbank market .
China commits that it shall continue to allow U.S. service suppliers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to rate all types of domestic bonds sold to domestic and international investors .
Within three months after the date of entry into force of this Agreement , China shall review and approve any pending license applications of U.S. service suppliers to provide credit rating services .
Each Party shall allow a supplier of credit rating services of the other Party to acquire a majority ownership stake in the supplier ’ s existing joint venture.
” Source : Bloomberg Peter Navarro goes even further .
In an interview he gave on Hugh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ underlying economic political philosophy .
You can check that out here : NAVARRO : Trump Gained UNPRECEDENTED Concessions From China In This Trade Deal

Trump promised to fix the broken trade deal with China. Here are five specific ways he has made good on that promise.
What’s so different and so good about Trump’s new trade deal with China? Here are Five specific categories.
1) Intellectual Property Protection
Intellectual property is now protected under this trade deal in ways that it was not previously. Additionally, there are remedies available to companies who believe their IP rights are being violated.
2) China Boosting US purchases
Compared to the 2017 baseline, China is committing to increase their purchase of US goods by no less than $200 Billion.
3) Tech Transfer
China will no longer force companies to involuntarily give their technologies to the Chinese Government. Any transaction will be voluntary and market-based.
4) Currency Enforcement
Trump campaigned on China engaging in unfair currency manipulation practices. This deal gives a mechanism and some leverage that can be used against China if they go back to such practices.
5) Financial Services
American financial service companies have wanted access to Chinese markets for the longest time. They will now have it.
“China shall allow U.S. financial services suppliers to apply for asset management company licenses that would permit them to acquire non-performing loans directly from Chinese banks, beginning with provincial licenses. When additional national licenses are granted, China shall treat U.S. financial services suppliers on a non-discriminatory basis with Chinese suppliers, including with respect to the granting of such licenses.” “No later than April 1, 2020, China shall remove the foreign equity cap in the life, pension, and health insurance sectors and allow wholly U.S.-owned insurance companies to participate in these sectors. China affirms that there are no restrictions on the ability of U.S.-owned insurance companies established in China to wholly own insurance asset management companies in China.” “No later than April 1, 2020, China shall eliminate foreign equity limits and allow wholly U.S.-owned services suppliers to participate in the securities, fund management, and futures sectors.” “China affirms that a wholly U.S.-owned credit rating services supplier has been allowed to rate domestic bonds sold to domestic and international investors, including for the interbank market. China commits that it shall continue to allow U.S. service suppliers, including wholly U.S.-owned credit rating services suppliers, to rate all types of domestic bonds sold to domestic and international investors. Within three months after the date of entry into force of this Agreement, China shall review and approve any pending license applications of U.S. service suppliers to provide credit rating services. Each Party shall allow a supplier of credit rating services of the other Party to acquire a majority ownership stake in the supplier’s existing joint venture.”
Source: Bloomberg
Peter Navarro goes even further. In an interview he gave on Hugh Hewitt he touched on Trump’s underlying economic political philosophy. You can check that out here: NAVARRO: Trump Gained UNPRECEDENTED Concessions From China In This Trade Deal


clashdaily--2020-01-16--Virginia Governor Declares State Of Emergency Ahead Of Pro-Gun Rally

Do you believe his reasons ?
Or is Gov Blackface/KKK just finding new and creative ways to trample the lawful rights of his citizens ?
Gov Northam knows there is a demonstration planned to oppose his position on gun-grabbing .
He ’ s scared — or claims to be — that things will get out of hand .
He ’ s even invoking Charlottesville to do it .
As though a march to defend a Constitutional right has anything in common with the events and actions taken in Charlottesville , the unmentioned violence by Black Block protesters , and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violent action based on hatred isn ’ t already behind bars .
Trending : Is The Church Driving Men Away ?
But here we are .
A demonstration is planned and Northam is running scared .
Northam said law enforcement intelligence analysts identified credible threats of violence , as well as white nationalist rhetoric and out-of-state militia plans that appeared similar to plans that led up to the deadly ‘ Unite the Right ’ rally in Charlottesville in 2017 .
A massive rally has been planned for weeks in Richmond on Jan. 20 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bills that are being considered in the General Assembly , including bans on ‘ assault weapons ’ ( one of which was already pulled by its sponsor ) , red flag laws , and universal background checks .
According to a press release from Northam ’ s office , “ credible intelligence gathered by Virginia ’ s law enforcement agencies indicates that tens of thousands of advocates plan to converge on Capitol Square for events culminating on January 20 , 2020 .
Available information suggests that a substantial number of these demonstrators are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , may be armed , and have as their purpose not peaceful assembly but violence , rioting , and insurrection.
” Specifically , Northam said they ’ ve received threats including people detailing plans to storm the Capitol Building , use weaponized drones , and more .
A state official cited one posting that included a photo of an AR-15 with a caption that said there are “ great sight angles from certain buildings ” near Capitol Square .
The State of Emergency issued by Northam effectively bans all weapons , including guns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and shields ( which were carried in the ‘ Unite the Right ’ rally by white nationalists ) from the grounds of the state capitol building .
Weapons listed in the declaration include “ any handgun , pistol , revolver , or other weapon designed or intended to propel or expel a projectile or missile of any kind by action of an explosion of any combustible material ; rifle , shotgun , automatic or semi-automatic gun ; assault firearm as defined in § 18.2-308.2:2 of the Code ; machine gun ; 3D printed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ specifically exempts “ all on-duty sworn law enforcement personnel providing security ” for the Capitol grounds , as well as “ any other person otherwise acting in coordination with the Division of Capitol Police.
” Source : WHSV The Effeminization Of The American Male by Doug Giles Doug Giles , best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog , ClashDaily.com , has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity .
That is , if the man-child will put down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome .
Buy Now : The Effeminization Of The American Male

Do you believe his reasons? Or is Gov Blackface/KKK just finding new and creative ways to trample the lawful rights of his citizens?
Gov Northam knows there is a demonstration planned to oppose his position on gun-grabbing.
He’s scared — or claims to be — that things will get out of hand. He’s even invoking Charlottesville to do it.
As though a march to defend a Constitutional right has anything in common with the events and actions taken in Charlottesville, the unmentioned violence by Black Block protesters, and the fact that the one guy who took violent action based on hatred isn’t already behind bars.
But here we are. A demonstration is planned and Northam is running scared.
We have received credible intelligence from our law enforcement agencies of threats of violence surrounding the demonstration planned for Monday, January 20. This includes extremist rhetoric similar to what has been seen before major incidents, such as Charlottesville in 2017. — Ralph Northam (@GovernorVA) January 15, 2020
Based on these threats, I am declaring a state of emergency in Richmond from Friday evening until Tuesday evening. This will include a ban on weapons of any kind in Capitol Square during that time. Learn more here: https://t.co/k8bxLj6odF — Ralph Northam (@GovernorVA) January 15, 2020
For more information about the steps we're taking to keep the public safe in light of credible threats of violence at Virginia's capitol on Monday, watch the video of today’s announcement here: https://t.co/qxFen99W0g — Ralph Northam (@GovernorVA) January 15, 2020
I’m outlining our efforts to keep the public safe ahead of a planned demonstration on January 20th. Posted by Governor of Virginia on Wednesday, January 15, 2020
Northam said law enforcement intelligence analysts identified credible threats of violence, as well as white nationalist rhetoric and out-of-state militia plans that appeared similar to plans that led up to the deadly ‘Unite the Right’ rally in Charlottesville in 2017. A massive rally has been planned for weeks in Richmond on Jan. 20 to protest a series of proposed gun bills that are being considered in the General Assembly, including bans on ‘assault weapons’ (one of which was already pulled by its sponsor), red flag laws, and universal background checks. According to a press release from Northam’s office, “credible intelligence gathered by Virginia’s law enforcement agencies indicates that tens of thousands of advocates plan to converge on Capitol Square for events culminating on January 20, 2020. Available information suggests that a substantial number of these demonstrators are expected to come from outside the Commonwealth, may be armed, and have as their purpose not peaceful assembly but violence, rioting, and insurrection.” Specifically, Northam said they’ve received threats including people detailing plans to storm the Capitol Building, use weaponized drones, and more. A state official cited one posting that included a photo of an AR-15 with a caption that said there are “great sight angles from certain buildings” near Capitol Square. The State of Emergency issued by Northam effectively bans all weapons, including guns, as well as items like helmets and shields (which were carried in the ‘Unite the Right’ rally by white nationalists) from the grounds of the state capitol building. Weapons listed in the declaration include “any handgun, pistol, revolver, or other weapon designed or intended to propel or expel a projectile or missile of any kind by action of an explosion of any combustible material; rifle, shotgun, automatic or semi-automatic gun; assault firearm as defined in § 18.2-308.2:2 of the Code; machine gun; 3D printed gun; or similar weapon.” It specifically exempts “all on-duty sworn law enforcement personnel providing security” for the Capitol grounds, as well as “any other person otherwise acting in coordination with the Division of Capitol Police.”
Source: WHSV
The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now:The Effeminization Of The American Male


clashdaily--2020-01-16--‘Progressive’Transgender Doll With Pigtails And A Johnson Sparks Outrage

In what possible nightmare world is it important for children ’ s dolls to be anatomically correct ?
Or weirder still , to make a ‘ statement ’ on gender norms ?
Whatever happened to letting kids be kids ?
You know , letting a doll ’ s ‘ naughty bits ’ be left blank because really , kids haven ’ t developed to the point where they ’ ve got any awareness of what those parts are for , seeing as they are , you know , KIDS and all .
But NO .
For some reason , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just play pretend with toys that leave private parts blank .
Trending : Is The Church Driving Men Away ?
Someone went ahead and made what looks like a baby ‘ Jessica Yaniv ’ doll .
As far as we know , it ’ s the world ’ s first transgender doll .
A transgender children ’ s doll – believed to be the world ’ s first – has gone on sale in Russia .
The doll – pictured with a penis and wearing a dress – sparked debate after being spotted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the doll at the Planeta Igrushek ( Planet Of Toys ) shop in the city of Novosibirsk went viral after being posted online .
The images show the doll with long blonde hair and an apparently female face .
It is shown wearing a red dress with what appears to be male genitalia underneath Source : Daily Star Look Who ’ s Back : ‘ Wax My Balls ’ Activist Punches Out Reporter ( Video )

In what possible nightmare world is it important for children’s dolls to be anatomically correct? Or weirder still, to make a ‘statement’ on gender norms?
Whatever happened to letting kids be kids?
You know, letting a doll’s ‘naughty bits’ be left blank because really, kids haven’t developed to the point where they’ve got any awareness of what those parts are for, seeing as they are, you know, KIDS and all.
But NO. For some reason, it’s not enough for kids to just play pretend with toys that leave private parts blank.
Someone went ahead and made what looks like a baby ‘Jessica Yaniv’ doll.
As far as we know, it’s the world’s first transgender doll.
A transgender children’s doll – believed to be the world’s first – has gone on sale in Russia . The doll – pictured with a penis and wearing a dress – sparked debate after being spotted in a Siberian toyshop. Pictures of the doll at the Planeta Igrushek (Planet Of Toys) shop in the city of Novosibirsk went viral after being posted online. The images show the doll with long blonde hair and an apparently female face. It is shown wearing a red dress with what appears to be male genitalia underneath
Source: Daily Star
Related…
Look Who’s Back: ‘Wax My Balls’ Activist Punches Out Reporter (Video)


clashdaily--2020-01-17--GHOULISH: Mexico Is Paying Women To Get Pregnant Via IVF And Then Abort For ‘Embryonic Research’

Looks like we ’ ve found a REAL ‘ Handmaid ’ s Tale ’ story… and no , it isn ’ t the RIGHT that it is implicating .
Is this just another example of economic interests with deep pockets exploiting the vulnerability of poor women in other countries ?
Where is AOC decrying this exploitation of ‘ women oour readers olor ’ ?
Let ’ s use Yale ’ s observations about surrogate parenting in India as a benchmark against which we can compare this story about women being paid to intentionally get pregnant and then abort ( emphasis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2002 and is one of the few countries where women can be paid for carrying another ’ s child .
Women ’ s rights groups criticize the $ 400 million industry for exploiting poor women and endangering their health to produce babies for rich clients , mostly from other nations : “ The low-cost technology , skilled doctors , scant bureaucracy and a plentiful supply of surrogates have made India a preferred destination for fertility tourism , attracting nationals from Britain , the United States , Australia and Japan , to name @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A government-funded survey found that the surrogate mothers are not assured a standard rate of compensation or post-delivery health insurance .
Proposed legislation would restrict surrogacy to women aged 21 to 35 , with insurance , and a notarized contract with the commissioning parents .
Critics suggest that too much regulation may hurt both prospective parents and also surrogates who earn a living through the industry .
India now prohibits surrogacy for foreign same-sex couples and individuals .
– YaleGlobal And THAT story was centered around the exploitation of women proceeding through their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about medical researchers hiring women in a macabre version of fetus farming ?
An ethically dubious study in a hospital close to Puerto Vallarta pays them $ 1400 to have their ovaries hyperstimulated , causing the release of multiple eggs , which are then inseminated… not artificially in a lab , but with actual sperm .
Later , the pregnant women are then subjected to a procedure to ‘ flush ’ ( the procedure is called ‘ lavage ’ ) the resulting still-viable embryos out of their wombs , to be used afterward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also had to get injections of powerful hormones to stimulate their ovaries , which can pose some risk .
In addition , some women underwent surgical or chemical abortions afterward , when tests indicated some of the embryos might not have been successfully removed .
“ I think this research was unethical , ” Zoloth says .
Source : NPR What about the ethics ?
This “ experiment ” was very wrong on at least four fronts .
First , it created human life for the purpose of experimenting upon it .
Second @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( when all the embryos were not flushed ) .
Third , it treated women as objects , merely as “ a Petri dish , ” to quote bioethicist Lorie Zoloth ( with whom I have had my differences in the past , but not here ) .
Fourth , hyperstimulation can have serious side effects , even leading to occasional death .
Add in the likelihood that the women were very poor , and you have a real exploitive circumstance .
My friend , the bioethicist William Hurlbut of Stanford , calls @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” that is , scientists conduct immoral or questionable studies out of the country that would probably not be allowed — or dared — to be pursued in the United States .
Source : NPR What do you think ?

Looks like we’ve found a REAL ‘Handmaid’s Tale’ story… and no, it isn’t the RIGHT that it is implicating.
Is this just another example of economic interests with deep pockets exploiting the vulnerability of poor women in other countries? Where is AOC decrying this exploitation of ‘women oour readers olor’?
Let’s use Yale’s observations about surrogate parenting in India as a benchmark against which we can compare this story about women being paid to intentionally get pregnant and then abort (emphasis added):
India legalized commercial surrogacy in 2002 and is one of the few countries where women can be paid for carrying another’s child. Women’s rights groups criticize the $400 million industry for exploiting poor women and endangering their health to produce babies for rich clients, mostly from other nations: “The low-cost technology, skilled doctors, scant bureaucracy and a plentiful supply of surrogates have made India a preferred destination for fertility tourism, attracting nationals from Britain, the United States, Australia and Japan, to name a few,” reports Reuters. A government-funded survey found that the surrogate mothers are not assured a standard rate of compensation or post-delivery health insurance. Proposed legislation would restrict surrogacy to women aged 21 to 35, with insurance, and a notarized contract with the commissioning parents. Critics suggest that too much regulation may hurt both prospective parents and also surrogates who earn a living through the industry. India now prohibits surrogacy for foreign same-sex couples and individuals. – YaleGlobal
And THAT story was centered around the exploitation of women proceeding through their pregnancy to its natural conclusion.
What about medical researchers hiring women in a macabre version of fetus farming?
An ethically dubious study in a hospital close to Puerto Vallarta pays them $1400 to have their ovaries hyperstimulated, causing the release of multiple eggs, which are then inseminated… not artificially in a lab, but with actual sperm.
Later, the pregnant women are then subjected to a procedure to ‘flush’ (the procedure is called ‘lavage’) the resulting still-viable embryos out of their wombs, to be used afterward for research or IVF.
The women also had to get injections of powerful hormones to stimulate their ovaries, which can pose some risk. In addition, some women underwent surgical or chemical abortions afterward, when tests indicated some of the embryos might not have been successfully removed. “I think this research was unethical,” Zoloth says.
Source: NPR
What about the ethics?
This “experiment” was very wrong on at least four fronts. First, it created human life for the purpose of experimenting upon it. Second, it paid women to have abortions (when all the embryos were not flushed). Third, it treated women as objects, merely as “a Petri dish,” to quote bioethicist Lorie Zoloth (with whom I have had my differences in the past, but not here). Fourth, hyperstimulation can have serious side effects, even leading to occasional death. Add in the likelihood that the women were very poor, and you have a real exploitive circumstance. My friend, the bioethicist William Hurlbut of Stanford, calls experiments such as this “outsourcing ethics,” that is, scientists conduct immoral or questionable studies out of the country that would probably not be allowed — or dared — to be pursued in the United States.
Source: NPR
What do you think?


clashdaily--2020-01-17--Dark Money Group With Ties To AOC To Spend $500K On Ads Attacking Biden And Buttigieg

Didn ’ t AOC say that dark money is used to manipulates electorates and is the enemy of democracy ?
It ’ s weird that she ’ d be ok with this then… Dark money groups are bad — unless they are targeting the Democrats on AOC ’ s list who aren ’ t tilting left far enough .
Then it ’ s totally fine .
A dark money group tied to the Justice Democrats PAC announced on Tuesday that it was planning on spending $ 500,000 on digital ads targeting former Vice President Joe Biden and Mayor Pete Buttigieg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thrown her support behind fellow “ Democratic Socialist ” Senator Bernie Sanders ( D-VT ) in his second bid to become the Democratic nominee .
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ( D-NY ) has made it clear that she doesn ’ t tolerate “ moderate ” Democrats and isn ’ t a fan of reaching across the aisle .
Last March AOC said that she was making a “ list ” of Democrats that voted the “ wrong ” way ( ie .
with Republicans ) in order to primary them .
It seems that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democratic Primary as well .
The group , Organize for Justice , is a 501 ( c ) ( 4 ) nonprofit organization , meaning it can raise unlimited sums of money without having to disclose the identity of its donors to the public .
Organize for Justice calls itself the “ sister organization ” of Justice Democrats , a PAC whose board Ocasio-Cortez served on throughout most of her pivotal 2018 primary campaign .
Organize for Justice plans on spending $ 500,000 on Facebook ads promoting news articles that highlight Biden and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , according to HuffPost .
The dark money group has already spent about $ 20,000 on about 40 Facebook ads , all of which were run on a month-old page called “ Watercooler Politics , ” Quartz reported .
The ads targeted voters in the early caucus and primary states of Iowa , New Hampshire and South Carolina .
Remember , it was just noted that AOC has withheld dues from the DNC because she is supporting her own progressive and democratic socialist PACs .
AOC didn ’ t comment on the move @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s made her view on “ dark money ” groups very clear .
Speaking of transparency in campaign finance , it ’ s not something that Occasional-Cortex seems to hold herself to .
AOC and her former campaign manager Saikat Chakrabarti had both served on the three-member board of the Justice Democrats PAC which coincidentally was supporting AOC ’ s primary campaign in 2018 , but didn ’ t disclose this info to the Federal Election Commission .
The Coolidge Reagan Foundation , a conservative watchdog group , filed an FEC complaint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unreported affiliation with Justice Democrats .
A total of three FEC complaints were filed against Ocasio-Cortez over her relationship with Justice Democrats .
Ocasio-Cortez acknowledged in August 2019 that she was “ in conversation ” with the FEC over the complaints , saying she was in “ total compliance ” with the law while dismissing the measures as a “ form of legal trolling ” from “ fringe , Republican groups.
” That ’ s why her buddy Saikat disappeared so quickly , right ?
It didn ’ t have anything to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made its way from far-left PACs to company accounts headed by her deliberately underpaid Chief of Staff .
Nor did it have anything to do with his open war against moderate Democrats .
Apparently AOC thinks that principles are all well and good — until they become inconvenient .
AOC has quickly adapted to the Swamp .
• SELF-AWARENESS FAIL : AOC Rants About Identity Politics… Claims She Doesn ’ t Weaponize Hers • Campaign Finance : Is CNN ’ s Beloved Occasional Cortex Just Another ‘ Swamp Thing ’ ?

Didn’t AOC say that dark money is used to manipulates electorates and is the enemy of democracy? It’s weird that she’d be ok with this then…
Dark money groups are bad — unless they are targeting the Democrats on AOC’s list who aren’t tilting left far enough. Then it’s totally fine.
A dark money group tied to the Justice Democrats PAC announced on Tuesday that it was planning on spending $500,000 on digital ads targeting former Vice President Joe Biden and Mayor Pete Buttigieg in the Democratic Primary.
AOC has thrown her support behind fellow “Democratic Socialist” Senator Bernie Sanders(D-VT) in his second bid to become the Democratic nominee.
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez(D-NY) has made it clear that she doesn’t tolerate “moderate” Democrats and isn’t a fan of reaching across the aisle. Last March AOC said that she was making a “list” of Democrats that voted the “wrong” way (ie. with Republicans) in order to primary them.
It seems that this fervent push left extends to the Democratic Primary as well.
The group, Organize for Justice, is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization, meaning it can raise unlimited sums of money without having to disclose the identity of its donors to the public. Organize for Justice calls itself the “sister organization” of Justice Democrats, a PAC whose board Ocasio-Cortez served on throughout most of her pivotal 2018 primary campaign. Organize for Justice plans on spending $500,000 on Facebook ads promoting news articles that highlight Biden and Buttigieg’s lack of progressive bonafides, according to HuffPost. The dark money group has already spent about $20,000 on about 40 Facebook ads, all of which were run on a month-old page called “Watercooler Politics,” Quartz reported. The ads targeted voters in the early caucus and primary states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina.
Remember, it was just noted that AOC has withheld dues from the DNC because she is supporting her own progressive and democratic socialist PACs.
AOC didn’t comment on the move by Organize for Justice, but she’s made her view on “dark money” groups very clear.
Dark money is used to manipulate electorates. It is the enemy to democracy. Period. When politicians and corporations weaved their dark web of campaign finance, they created a ticking time bomb for foreign adversaries. To make our democracy safer, we need to get big money OUT. https://t.co/OYX62jboZH — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) February 17, 2018
Speaking of transparency in campaign finance, it’s not something that Occasional-Cortex seems to hold herself to.
AOC and her former campaign manager Saikat Chakrabarti had both served on the three-member board of the Justice Democrats PAC which coincidentally was supporting AOC’s primary campaign in 2018, but didn’t disclose this info to the Federal Election Commission.
The Coolidge Reagan Foundation, a conservative watchdog group, filed an FEC complaint against Ocasio-Cortez in April 2019 over her unreported affiliation with Justice Democrats. A total of three FEC complaints were filed against Ocasio-Cortez over her relationship with Justice Democrats. Ocasio-Cortez acknowledged in August 2019 that she was “in conversation” with the FEC over the complaints, saying she was in “total compliance” with the law while dismissing the measures as a “form of legal trolling” from “fringe, Republican groups.” Source: The Daily Caller
That’s why her buddy Saikat disappeared so quickly, right? It didn’t have anything to do with the cool million buckaroos that somehow made its way from far-left PACs to company accounts headed by her deliberately underpaid Chief of Staff. Nor did it have anything to do with his open war against moderate Democrats.
Apparently AOC thinks that principles are all well and good — until they become inconvenient.
AOC has quickly adapted to the Swamp.
Related: