clashdaily--2020-02-06--More MAGA Winning: Gallup Poll Has NEVER Recorded This Level Of Economic Optimism

This is very good news for a President seeking re-election .
Americans feel better about their personal financial situation than they did under Obama , Clinton , or even Reagan .
This year-to-year number has been rising since 2018 and has hit a 44-year record high according to Gallup ’ s “ Mood of the Nation ” economic survey .
Gallup reports that 59 % of Americans — nearly six in 10 — say that they are better off financially than they were a year ago , which is up from 50 % last year .
These data come from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nation survey , conducted Jan. 2-15 .
The survey was completed after months of historically low levels of unemployment and as the Dow Jones Industrial Average neared the 30,000 mark for the first time .
The current 59 % of Americans who say they are better off financially than they were a year ago is essentially tied for the all-time high of 58 % in January 1999 .
That was recorded during the dot-com boom , with conditions similar to the current state of the economy — a stock market rocketing to then-record @ @ @ @ @ @ @ though GDP growth was higher at that time .
There has also been a sharp decline in the percentage of people who say that they are financially worse off than a year ago .
Only 20 % of Americans are stating that as their financial reality , and that is a record low .
In addition , Americans are quite optimistic about their longer-term future financial outlook with 3 in 4 respondents ( 74 % ) predicting that they ’ ll be in an even better position next year .
This is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ question in 1977 .
The previous high at 71 % was during the dot-com boom in 1998 .
Americans ’ levels of optimism about both their current financial situation and where it will be a year from now are at or near record highs .
These views align with President Donald Trump ’ s contention that Americans are doing better under his presidency , and with his use of the economy and job growth as key selling points for his reelection .
Republicans ’ positive views on their finances are something of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least during good economic times .
The majority levels of optimism among political independents are more significant for Trump ’ s reelection prospects — and something Trump will want to maintain in 2020 to stay competitive .
This fantastic economic boom is how President Trump is going to win the 2020 election .
Which of the Democrats running for President can assure voters that their financial future is secure when they ’ re running on full-blown socialism with “ free ” healthcare , student loan forgiveness , and proposing to completely overhaul the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This Gallup poll comes hot-on-the-heels of another poll they released showing that approval of President Trump ’ s job performance was at 49 % — four points higher than Obama ’ s at the same point in his presidency .
The poll was conducted between January 16-29 in the midst of the Senate impeachment hearing where the mainstream Media ( D ) coverage was 100 % negative of the President ’ s defense and 95 % positive of the Impeachment managers .
The coverage of the President himself was 93 % negative , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before the impeachment circus .
Imagine if the presstitutes weren ’ t so partisan and were actually “ fair and balanced ” with their coverage of President Trump .
His approval rating would likely be even higher .
• Just In Time For SOTU : Trump Riding High On Polls , Pelosi & Schiff , Not So Much • The Trump Economy CRUSHES All Expectations For Another Month – Here ’ s The 411 • LMAO : French Journo Asks POTUS The Secret Of Our Economy… His Answer Is Trumpian GOLD !
( @ @

This is very good news for a President seeking re-election.
Americans feel better about their personal financial situation than they did under Obama, Clinton, or even Reagan. This year-to-year number has been rising since 2018 and has hit a 44-year record high according to Gallup’s “Mood of the Nation” economic survey. Gallup reports that 59% of Americans — nearly six in 10 — say that they are better off financially than they were a year ago, which is up from 50% last year.
These data come from Gallup’s annual Mood of the Nation survey, conducted Jan. 2-15. The survey was completed after months of historically low levels of unemployment and as the Dow Jones Industrial Average neared the 30,000 mark for the first time. The current 59% of Americans who say they are better off financially than they were a year ago is essentially tied for the all-time high of 58% in January 1999. That was recorded during the dot-com boom, with conditions similar to the current state of the economy — a stock market rocketing to then-record highs and unemployment at multidecade lows — though GDP growth was higher at that time.
There has also been a sharp decline in the percentage of people who say that they are financially worse off than a year ago. Only 20% of Americans are stating that as their financial reality, and that is a record low.
In addition, Americans are quite optimistic about their longer-term future financial outlook with 3 in 4 respondents (74%) predicting that they’ll be in an even better position next year. This is the highest response since Gallup started asking this question in 1977. The previous high at 71% was during the dot-com boom in 1998.
In addition to U.S. adults’ highly positive report on their current financial situation, Americans are also expressing peak optimism about their future personal financial situation. About three in four U.S. adults (74%) predict they will be better off financially a year from now, the highest in Gallup’s trend since 1977.
Americans’ levels of optimism about both their current financial situation and where it will be a year from now are at or near record highs. These views align with President Donald Trump’s contention that Americans are doing better under his presidency, and with his use of the economy and job growth as key selling points for his reelection. Republicans’ positive views on their finances are something of a given for a GOP president, at least during good economic times. The majority levels of optimism among political independents are more significant for Trump’s reelection prospects — and something Trump will want to maintain in 2020 to stay competitive. Source: Gallup
This fantastic economic boom is how President Trump is going to win the 2020 election.
Which of the Democrats running for President can assure voters that their financial future is secure when they’re running on full-blown socialism with “free” healthcare, student loan forgiveness, and proposing to completely overhaul the economy under the Green New Deal?
This Gallup poll comes hot-on-the-heels of another poll they released showing that approval of President Trump’s job performance was at 49% — four points higher than Obama’s at the same point in his presidency.
The poll was conducted between January 16-29 in the midst of the Senate impeachment hearing where the mainstream Media(D) coverage was 100% negative of the President’s defense and 95% positive of the Impeachment managers. The coverage of the President himself was 93% negative, up from the already shocking 90% before the impeachment circus.
Imagine if the presstitutes weren’t so partisan and were actually “fair and balanced” with their coverage of President Trump. His approval rating would likely be even higher.
Related:


clashdaily--2020-02-07--IOWA CIRCUS: Mayor Pete Gave A ‘Victory’ Speech Monday — Then Bernie Gave One On Thursday

Two candidates are declaring victory in Iowa for two very different reasons .
It wasn ’ t exactly the come-from-behind win that Buttigieg was looking for , but he got the praise from the Media ( D ) anyway , while Bernie got shafted .
Again .
On Monday night , Democrat candidates waited and waited for the results of the Iowa caucuses .
They kept waiting because the results were delayed for hours .
Due to a combination of catastrophic technical errors , complicated caucus rules , the Iowa Democratic Party ’ s failure to properly train reporting officers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were no results to report .
Candidates then scrambled to take advantage of the desperate media organizations waiting to report something so they fought for airtime to give a victory speech .
Senator Amy Klobuchar ( D-MN ) was the first one up , but the rest quickly followed suit .
Trending : John Kerry Says That The ENTIRE Obama Admin Was Trying To Get Rid Of The Burisma Prosecutor Pete Buttigieg jumped the shark and grabbed the headlines for days after the Iowa caucus fiasco .
He gave a rousing speech to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ errors .
( More on that later . )
But the Media ( D ) didn ’ t say boo about those .
It turns out that the lead wasn ’ t as large as Mayor Pete claimed it was with zero precincts reporting .
It ’ s actually a real nail-biter — with 97 % of precincts reporting the Mayor of South Bend holds only a tenth-of a percent lead over Senator Bernie Sanders .
There were allegations that Mayor Pete ’ s campaign may have put their thumb on the scales @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that one of Buttigieg ’ s senior advisors is married to the woman who founded ACRONYM , the parent-company of Shadow Inc. which developed the app that the Iowa Democratic Party used to tabulate the results .
Shadow Inc. was launched by ACRONYM , a nonprofit corporation founded in 2017 by Tara McGowan , a political strategist who runs companies aimed at promoting Democratic candidates and priorities .
McGowan , 34 , is married to Michael Halle , a senior strategist for Pete Buttigieg ’ s presidential campaign , which records show has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ software .
McGowan sought to distance herself from Shadow ’ s IowaReporterApp on Monday night , characterizing the app developer as an “ independent ” company .
In a separate statement , an ACRONYM spokesman said the nonprofit organization is an investor in several companies , including Shadow , but was “ eagerly awaiting more information from the Iowa Democratic Party with respect to what happened.
” But business and tax records show ACRONYM and Shadow are registered at the same Washington , D.C. , street address , which belongs to a WeWork @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previously served as the chief operating officer and chief technology officer at ACRONYM , according to an online resume .
And on Sunday , McGowan tweeted pictures from a birthday celebration that included her husband and Troy Price , the chairman of the Iowa Democratic Party .
McGowan has denied any interference , but try convincing the Bernie Bros of that .
Bernie was robbed of the nomination by the DNC in 2016 and it ’ s going to be difficult to dismiss so many errors that are seemingly always at Bernie ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But Mayor Pete went ahead and gave his speech and tried to grab the momentum to propel him forward into New Hampshire .
Since the superior individuals in the Media ( D ) won ’ t do it , I guess I will fact-check a couple of choice nuggets from Mayor Pete ’ s speech .
QUICK FACT-CHECK : When Mayor Pete said , “ tonight , an improbable hope became an undeniable reality ” there was no data yet released .
He had no idea who had won .
It was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at this point .
” We don ’ t know all the results , but we know by the time it ’ s all said and done , Iowa , you have shocked the nation.
” This is actually true .
It ’ s clear everyone was shocked by the absolute cluster*bleep* that Iowa was .
“ By all indications , we are going on to New Hampshire victorious.
” No , actually .
You can ’ t claim victory with zero precincts reporting .
Buttigieg said , “ Tonight , Iowa chose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tell with no results released ?
He adds , that his campaign “ has room for everyone because no matter who you voted for in elections past .
For that matter , no matter who you caucused for tonight , we welcome you in our campaign and you belong in the future that we are building for America .
There ’ s room for you… unless you happen to be pro-life , because , in that instance , Mayor Pete thinks you shouldn ’ t be in the Democratic party at all .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is… It ain ’ t over , folks .
The errors were even worse than imagined .
According to a New York Times analysis , the results were “ riddled with errors.
” The results released by the Iowa Democratic Party on Wednesday were riddled with inconsistencies and other flaws .
According to a New York Times analysis , more than 100 precincts reported results that were internally inconsistent , that were missing data or that were not possible under the complex rules of the Iowa caucuses .
In some cases , vote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ others , precincts are shown allotting the wrong number of delegates to certain candidates .
And in at least a few cases , the Iowa Democratic Party ’ s reported results do not match those reported by the precincts .
Some of these inconsistencies may prove to be innocuous , and they do not indicate an intentional effort to compromise or rig the result .
There is no apparent bias in favor of the leaders Pete Buttigieg or Bernie Sanders , meaning the overall effect on the winner ’ s margin may be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ errors are minor , and they raise questions about whether the public will ever get a completely precise account of the Iowa results .
With Mr. Sanders closing to within 0.1 percentage points with 97 percent of 1,765 precincts reporting , the race could easily grow close enough for even the most minor errors to delay a final projection or raise doubts about a declared winner .
Source : New York Times On Wednesday , the New York Post reported that the DNC , frustrated with the “ dithering ” of Iowa Democratic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over ” the accounting of the results of the botched caucuses .
Then , at around noon on Thursday , DNC Chair Tom Perez is calling for a recanvass to ensure the accuracy of the results .
Late in the afternoon on Thursday , Andrew Yang tweeted that it looked like Bernie had actually won Iowa .
It seems that although Buttigieg had been leading in delegates , Bernie had won the popular vote .
The complicated rules of awarding delegates may mean that in the end , Buttigieg is awarded more delegates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the popular vote .
Sanders gave his own victory speech on Thursday dismissing the idea that the winner is the one with more state delegates .
“ What certainly is not going to change is the fact that in terms of the popular vote , we won a decisive victory , ” Sanders said .
“ Some 6,000 more Iowans came out on caucus night to support our candidacy than the candidacy of anyone else .
And when 6,000 more people come out for you in an election than your nearest opponent , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that a victory.
” Sanders acknowledged the final results could end up with Buttigieg being awarded a few more “ delegate equivalents ” — a traditional measure used to judge the victor of the caucus under its rules .
But he said those won ’ t be a factor when it comes to choosing the nominee , and that both men will have the same number of delegates at the Democratic convention in the summer .
When asked about it after his address , he said that as far as he ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ votes wins .
It looks like the gloves are off and the race to see who is going to be humiliated by President Trump in November is about to get interesting .

Two candidates are declaring victory in Iowa for two very different reasons.
It wasn’t exactly the come-from-behind win that Buttigieg was looking for, but he got the praise from the Media(D) anyway, while Bernie got shafted. Again.
On Monday night, Democrat candidates waited and waited for the results of the Iowa caucuses. They kept waiting because the results were delayed for hours. Due to a combination of catastrophic technical errors, complicated caucus rules, the Iowa Democratic Party’s failure to properly train reporting officers, and simple human error, there were no results to report.
Candidates then scrambled to take advantage of the desperate media organizations waiting to report something so they fought for airtime to give a victory speech. Senator Amy Klobuchar(D-MN) was the first one up, but the rest quickly followed suit.
Pete Buttigieg jumped the shark and grabbed the headlines for days after the Iowa caucus fiasco. He gave a rousing speech to his supporters that was jam-packed with factual errors. (More on that later.) But the Media(D) didn’t say boo about those.
It turns out that the lead wasn’t as large as Mayor Pete claimed it was with zero precincts reporting. It’s actually a real nail-biter — with 97% of precincts reporting the Mayor of South Bend holds only a tenth-of a percent lead over Senator Bernie Sanders.
Pete Buttigieg held onto an ever-so-narrow delegate lead in the Iowa caucus results late Wednesday, with 97% of precincts reporting. Buttigieg had 26.2% of State Delegate Equivalents — but Bernie Sanders was close behind with 26.1%. Elizabeth Warren remained in third place with 18.2%, Joe Biden was in fourth with 15.8% and Amy Klobuchar was in fifth with 12.2%. Source: CBS News
There were allegations that Mayor Pete’s campaign may have put their thumb on the scales in the election because it was revealed that one of Buttigieg’s senior advisors is married to the woman who founded ACRONYM, the parent-company of Shadow Inc. which developed the app that the Iowa Democratic Party used to tabulate the results.
The Associated Press reports:
Shadow Inc. was launched by ACRONYM, a nonprofit corporation founded in 2017 by Tara McGowan, a political strategist who runs companies aimed at promoting Democratic candidates and priorities. McGowan, 34, is married to Michael Halle, a senior strategist for Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaign, which records show has also paid Shadow Inc. $42,500 for software. McGowan sought to distance herself from Shadow’s IowaReporterApp on Monday night, characterizing the app developer as an “independent” company. In a separate statement, an ACRONYM spokesman said the nonprofit organization is an investor in several companies, including Shadow, but was “eagerly awaiting more information from the Iowa Democratic Party with respect to what happened.” But business and tax records show ACRONYM and Shadow are registered at the same Washington, D.C., street address, which belongs to a WeWork co-working location. Shadow CEO Gerard Niemira previously served as the chief operating officer and chief technology officer at ACRONYM, according to an online resume. And on Sunday, McGowan tweeted pictures from a birthday celebration that included her husband and Troy Price, the chairman of the Iowa Democratic Party.
McGowan has denied any interference, but try convincing the Bernie Bros of that. Bernie was robbed of the nomination by the DNC in 2016 and it’s going to be difficult to dismiss so many errors that are seemingly always at Bernie’s expense as complete and utter incompetence.
But Mayor Pete went ahead and gave his speech and tried to grab the momentum to propel him forward into New Hampshire.
Since the superior individuals in the Media(D) won’t do it, I guess I will fact-check a couple of choice nuggets from Mayor Pete’s speech.
QUICK FACT-CHECK: When Mayor Pete said, “tonight, an improbable hope became an undeniable reality” there was no data yet released. He had no idea who had won. It was totally deniable because zero precincts had reported at this point. ”
We don’t know all the results, but we know by the time it’s all said and done, Iowa, you have shocked the nation.” This is actually true. It’s clear everyone was shocked by the absolute cluster*bleep* that Iowa was. “By all indications, we are going on to New Hampshire victorious.” No, actually. You can’t claim victory with zero precincts reporting.
Buttigieg said, “Tonight, Iowa chose a new path.” How can he tell with no results released?
He adds, that his campaign “has room for everyone because no matter who you voted for in elections past. For that matter, no matter who you caucused for tonight, we welcome you in our campaign and you belong in the future that we are building for America.
There’s room for you… unless you happen to be pro-life, because, in that instance, Mayor Pete thinks you shouldn’t be in the Democratic party at all.
But enough about how wrong Mayor Pete is…
It ain’t over, folks. The errors were even worse than imagined.
According to a New York Times analysis, the results were “riddled with errors.”
The results released by the Iowa Democratic Party on Wednesday were riddled with inconsistencies and other flaws. According to a New York Times analysis, more than 100 precincts reported results that were internally inconsistent, that were missing data or that were not possible under the complex rules of the Iowa caucuses. In some cases, vote tallies do not add up. In others, precincts are shown allotting the wrong number of delegates to certain candidates. And in at least a few cases, the Iowa Democratic Party’s reported results do not match those reported by the precincts. Some of these inconsistencies may prove to be innocuous, and they do not indicate an intentional effort to compromise or rig the result. There is no apparent bias in favor of the leaders Pete Buttigieg or Bernie Sanders, meaning the overall effect on the winner’s margin may be small. But not all of the errors are minor, and they raise questions about whether the public will ever get a completely precise account of the Iowa results. With Mr. Sanders closing to within 0.1 percentage points with 97 percent of 1,765 precincts reporting, the race could easily grow close enough for even the most minor errors to delay a final projection or raise doubts about a declared winner.
Source: New York Times
On Wednesday, the New York Post reported that the DNC, frustrated with the “dithering” of Iowa Democratic Party officials, decided to “take over” the accounting of the results of the botched caucuses.
Then, at around noon on Thursday, DNC Chair Tom Perez is calling for a recanvass to ensure the accuracy of the results.
A recanvass is a review of the worksheets from each caucus site to ensure accuracy. The IDP will continue to report results. — Tom Perez (@TomPerez) February 6, 2020
A recanvass is essentially a double-checking of the vote. Iowa officials would have to hand audit the caucus worksheets and reporting forms to ensure that they were correctly calculated and reported. As of Thursday morning, former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg was clinging to the narrowest of leads in Iowa over Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., on Thursday, with 97 percent of the caucus vote released.
Source: NBC News
Late in the afternoon on Thursday, Andrew Yang tweeted that it looked like Bernie had actually won Iowa. It seems that although Buttigieg had been leading in delegates, Bernie had won the popular vote.
It sure looks like Bernie won Iowa. Excited to compete for the win in New Hampshire on Tuesday! — Andrew Yang? (@AndrewYang) February 6, 2020
The complicated rules of awarding delegates may mean that in the end, Buttigieg is awarded more delegates than Bernie even though Mayor Pete loses the popular vote.
Sanders gave his own victory speech on Thursday dismissing the idea that the winner is the one with more state delegates.
“What certainly is not going to change is the fact that in terms of the popular vote, we won a decisive victory,” Sanders said. “Some 6,000 more Iowans came out on caucus night to support our candidacy than the candidacy of anyone else. And when 6,000 more people come out for you in an election than your nearest opponent, we here in northern New England call that a victory.” Sanders acknowledged the final results could end up with Buttigieg being awarded a few more “delegate equivalents” — a traditional measure used to judge the victor of the caucus under its rules. But he said those won’t be a factor when it comes to choosing the nominee, and that both men will have the same number of delegates at the Democratic convention in the summer. Source: Los Angeles Times
When asked about it after his address, he said that as far as he’s concerned, the person with the most votes wins.
Question: Mayor Pete's been declaring a win for days now, why should people believe your victory speech over his? Bernie: Because I got 6,000 more votes, and from where I come from when you get 6,000 more votes that's generally regarded to be the winner #IowaCaucus #NotMeUs pic.twitter.com/Ts6lgS9G4d — People for Bernie (@People4Bernie) February 6, 2020
It looks like the gloves are off and the race to see who is going to be humiliated by President Trump in November is about to get interesting.


clashdaily--2020-02-07--James Woods Is BACK On Twitter And It’s SPECTACULAR

And his target was none other than AOC and her ridiculous bootstrap comment .
Trending : John Kerry Says That The ENTIRE Obama Admin Was Trying To Get Rid Of The Burisma Prosecutor He followed that up with a real beauty : He interacted with Juanita Broaddrick as she gushed about how awesome this week has been so far .
Woods was bombarded with love on Twitter… …and a wee bit of hate — but that just brought back the James Woods Twitter catchphrase : # Instablock !
Before his sudden return , the last tweet that Woods posted had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mueller report .
In early May , after being temporarily banned on Twitter , Woods decided to quit the platform altogether because he was tired of the social media site ’ s repeated attempts to censor him .
“ Twitter demanded that I rescind my tweet paraphrasing Emerson , ” Woods said .
“ It now seems they have chosen to delete that tweet from my account without my permission .
Until free speech is allowed on Twitter , I will not be permitted to participate in our democracy with my voice .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ coward he seems to be , my Twitter days are in the past.
” President Trump weighed in on the censorship of Woods : Senator Ted Cruz ( R-TX ) noted that it was interesting that James Woods was being banned for the wording of his tweet , but Jim Carrey , who posts unhinged “ art ” and anti-Trump hate screeds was not .
But now , Woods is back , baby !
That means that 2020 is going to be the best year ever !
It ’ s already had a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President acquitted , poll numbers rising , the economy booming , unemployment rates falling , financial optimism rising , the Democrats imploding on multiple levels , and now James Woods triggering libs on Twitter !

He immediately began trolling…
And his target was none other than AOC and her ridiculous bootstrap comment.
I’ve tried so hard this past year to live without the wealth of knowledge available on Twitter, but this kind of blazing insight can be found nowhere else, so… I’m back! #AOCStillAMoron pic.twitter.com/kB0oDXmArB — James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) February 7, 2020
He followed that up with a real beauty:
I was on vacation awhile, avoiding the news. How’d the #Mueller thing work out? The #impeachment scam? Who won the #Iowa caucuses? Is #MichaelAvenatti still a contender for the Democratic nomination for President? How’s #JeffreyEpstein doing? — James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) February 7, 2020
He interacted with Juanita Broaddrick as she gushed about how awesome this week has been so far.
And hopefully you will eventually be victorious in your quest to bring the #RapistClinton to justice. We will stand by you until he is behind bars (hopefully monitored by the same guards who watched over Jeffrey Epstein). https://t.co/SmgcJ1Mrhp — James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) February 7, 2020
Woods was bombarded with love on Twitter…
I simply can’t express how honored I am by the kindness and warmth I have received by so many of my Twitter friends tonight. You are genuinely such fine people. Thank you. I am in tears. — James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) February 7, 2020
…and a wee bit of hate — but that just brought back the James Woods Twitter catchphrase: #Instablock!
Before his sudden return, the last tweet that Woods posted had been in April and was about the Mueller report.
Yeah, a tad more than “likely….” https://t.co/Wsr7GTaBRD — James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) April 20, 2019
In early May, after being temporarily banned on Twitter, Woods decided to quit the platform altogether because he was tired of the social media site’s repeated attempts to censor him.
He told the Daily Wire:
“Twitter demanded that I rescind my tweet paraphrasing Emerson,” Woods said. “It now seems they have chosen to delete that tweet from my account without my permission. Until free speech is allowed on Twitter, I will not be permitted to participate in our democracy with my voice. As long as Jack Dorsey remains the coward he seems to be, my Twitter days are in the past.”
President Trump weighed in on the censorship of Woods:
How can it be possible that James Woods (and many others), a strong but responsible Conservative Voice, is banned from Twitter? Social Media & Fake News Media, together with their partner, the Democrat Party, have no idea the problems they are causing for themselves. VERY UNFAIR! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 4, 2019
Senator Ted Cruz(R-TX) noted that it was interesting that James Woods was being banned for the wording of his tweet, but Jim Carrey, who posts unhinged “art” and anti-Trump hate screeds was not.
How is it that @RealJamesWoods is currently being banned on Twitter, but @JimCarrey is not? It’s certainly not any standard based on “hate.” Carrey’s latest Twitter “art” shows Bill Barr drowning in a sea of vomit. @Jack – how ‘bout we let everybody speak and the People decide? — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) May 4, 2019
But now, Woods is back, baby!
That means that 2020 is going to be the best year ever! It’s already had a helluva start with impeachment over, the President acquitted, poll numbers rising, the economy booming, unemployment rates falling, financial optimism rising, the Democrats imploding on multiple levels, and now James Woods triggering libs on Twitter!
2020 is gonna be fan-freaking-tastic!


clashdaily--2020-02-07--Churches Need More MEN In Leadership Roles, Not Less

Bad things happen to a church — and to a culture — when men abandon their traditional masculine roles .
They get themselves into all sorts of trouble chasing after counterfeits .
And the good things God had ordained as the contribution to society good men were supposed to provide fall to the wayside .
Trending : John Kerry Says That The ENTIRE Obama Admin Was Trying To Get Rid Of The Burisma Prosecutor What role does the Church have in all of this ?
It can either be part of the problem , or part of the solution .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ did !
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg .
Also , don ’ t miss out on Doug Giles ’ best-selling book : Rules For Radical Christians is not a survival devotional designed to help the young Christian adult limp through life .
Rather , it is a road-tested , dominion blueprint that will equip the young adult with leadership skills and sufficient motivation to rise to a place of influence in an overtly non-Christian culture .
Rules For Radical Christians gives the reader the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into an anti-theistic environment and effectively influence it for the glory of God .
You can choose either the classic Paperback to trigger your college professors and quasi-communist classmates , or the Kindle edition to always have it on hand .

Bad things happen to a church — and to a culture — when men abandon their traditional masculine roles.
They get themselves into all sorts of trouble chasing after counterfeits.
And the good things God had ordained as the contribution to society good men were supposed to provide fall to the wayside.
Fatherhood, for example.
What role does the Church have in all of this?
It can either be part of the problem, or part of the solution.
Did you love that? Sure you did!
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg.
Also, don’t miss out on Doug Giles’ best-selling book:
Rules For Radical Christians is not a survival devotional designed to help the young Christian adult limp through life. Rather, it is a road-tested, dominion blueprint that will equip the young adult with leadership skills and sufficient motivation to rise to a place of influence in an overtly non-Christian culture. Rules For Radical Christians gives the reader the keys to become strategically equipped to move into an anti-theistic environment and effectively influence it for the glory of God.
Get yours today!
You can choose either the classic Paperback to trigger your college professors and quasi-communist classmates, or the Kindle edition to always have it on hand.


clashdaily--2020-02-07--LMAO: AOC Doesn’t Understand A Metaphor — Gets DRAGGED On Twitter

A video of bartender turned Congresswoman was getting a lot of attention on Twitter for all the wrong reasons .
It seems that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ( D-NY ) is very upset by a common metaphor for working hard — “ lift yourself up by your bootstraps.
” She explained that it ’ s “ a physical impossibility to lift yourself up by a bootstrap — by your shoelaces.
” Trending : John Kerry Says That The ENTIRE Obama Admin Was Trying To Get Rid Of The Burisma Prosecutor It is astounding that AOC can be so consistently wrong on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ statistically , she ’ d be correct at least occasionally .
But it seems that the old joke that “ even a stopped clock is right twice a day ” doesn ’ t seem applicable to AOC .
Of course , this is the kind of thing that happens when you get your opinions directly from articles on HuffPo : “ Pull yourself up by your bootstraps.
” It ’ s a common phrase in American political discourse , particularly present in conservative rhetoric about self-reliance .
The concept is simple : To @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to succeed or elevate yourself without any outside help .
But when you examine this expression and its current meaning , it doesn ’ t seem to make much sense .
To pull yourself up by your bootstraps is actually physically impossible .
In fact , the original meaning of the phrase was more along the lines of “ to try to do something completely absurd.
” After a few hours of mockery , AOC tweeted out a video of Rev .
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. speaking about the difficulty African Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bootstraps because of the legacy of slavery , institutional racism , and segregation — which were all still things that MLK ’ s civil rights movement was addressing .
Interestingly , even though he says that telling “ someone with no boots ” to lift themselves up by their own bootstraps ignores the legacy of slavery and segregation , MLK still says , “ Now I believe we ought to do all we can and seek to lift ourselves by our own bootstraps.
” She then takes a shot at President Trump and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her own story about how hard she worked to get elected but denying that her hard work was “ bootstrapping.
” Some mocked AOC ’ s bizarre literal take of the commonly used metaphor , but also that she didn ’ t even realize the irony of a woman who went from bartender to Congresswoman stating that you can ’ t accomplish things with hard work .
Admittedly , AOC worked very hard knocking on doors to win against Joe Crowley a 10-term incumbent and the Democratic Caucus Chair .
It was a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Daily Beast tweeted , “ Long gone are the days when , say , a lower-middle class , outer-borough bartender could ascend to the commanding heights of America ’ s ruling elite.
” Conservative commentator , Lauren Chen thought it was hilarious .
She wrote , “ Not sure what ’ s funnier : > AOC taking metaphors literally > AOC , a former bartender who is now a congressman , dismissing the idea of pulling yourself up by the bootstraps.
” There were also many tweets mocking Rep. Ocasio-Cortez by pretending to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the hashtag # AOCsplaining .
A couple of Twitter users had a whole lot of fun with this hashtag : The Media ( D ) keeps saying that conservatives are obsessed with AOC .
It ’ s not that it ’ s an obsession , it ’ s just that she says so many wrong things and does it in such a spectacularly bad way that it ’ s difficult to ignore her .
She has the singular ability of being a true believer of all things progressive , completely incapable of coherent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asserting her ignorance as knowledge .
If I didn ’ t know better , I ’ d think that this was just the best performance art that I ’ ve ever seen… but she ’ s simply not bright enough to pull off an act like that for this long .

A video of bartender turned Congresswoman was getting a lot of attention on Twitter for all the wrong reasons.
It seems that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez(D-NY) is very upset by a common metaphor for working hard — “lift yourself up by your bootstraps.” She explained that it’s “a physical impossibility to lift yourself up by a bootstrap — by your shoelaces.”
.@AOC on America’s rags-to-riches ideal: “It’s a physical impossibility to lift yourself up by a bootstrap, by your shoelaces? It’s physically impossible. The whole thing is a joke.” pic.twitter.com/9WNf8UE06T — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) February 6, 2020
It is astounding that AOC can be so consistently wrong on everything. You’d think that statistically, she’d be correct at least occasionally. But it seems that the old joke that “even a stopped clock is right twice a day” doesn’t seem applicable to AOC.
Of course, this is the kind of thing that happens when you get your opinions directly from articles on HuffPo:
“Pull yourself up by your bootstraps.” It’s a common phrase in American political discourse, particularly present in conservative rhetoric about self-reliance. The concept is simple: To pull yourself up by your bootstraps means to succeed or elevate yourself without any outside help. But when you examine this expression and its current meaning, it doesn’t seem to make much sense. To pull yourself up by your bootstraps is actually physically impossible. In fact, the original meaning of the phrase was more along the lines of “to try to do something completely absurd.” Source: Huffington Post
After a few hours of mockery, AOC tweeted out a video of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. speaking about the difficulty African Americans faced in pulling themselves up by their bootstraps because of the legacy of slavery, institutional racism, and segregation — which were all still things that MLK’s civil rights movement was addressing. Interestingly, even though he says that telling “someone with no boots” to lift themselves up by their own bootstraps ignores the legacy of slavery and segregation, MLK still says, “Now I believe we ought to do all we can and seek to lift ourselves by our own bootstraps.”
What does “bootstrapping” mean to the GOP?
That you didn’t go to public school?
That you didn’t enlist in the military, which is funded by the gov?
That you never got a tax break for starting a business or buying a home?
That your parents never used food assistance to feed you? — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) February 6, 2020
She then takes a shot at President Trump and his family for inheriting wealth and cites her own story about how hard she worked to get elected but denying that her hard work was “bootstrapping.”
I worked my butt off to get elected against all odds, without any special connections or money. I worked double shifts and wore through my shoes, outspent 10:1 to get elected. Even w/ all that hard work, it would be narcissistic to pretend I “bootstrapped” it alone & w/o others. — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) February 6, 2020
Some mocked AOC’s bizarre literal take of the commonly used metaphor, but also that she didn’t even realize the irony of a woman who went from bartender to Congresswoman stating that you can’t accomplish things with hard work. Admittedly, AOC worked very hard knocking on doors to win against Joe Crowley a 10-term incumbent and the Democratic Caucus Chair. It was a huge upset.
Lachlan Markay of the Daily Beast tweeted, “Long gone are the days when, say, a lower-middle class, outer-borough bartender could ascend to the commanding heights of America’s ruling elite.”
Long gone are the days when, say, a lower-middle class, outer-borough bartender could ascend to the commanding heights of America's ruling elite https://t.co/NCA8R28XkR — Lachlan Markay (@lachlan) February 6, 2020
Conservative commentator, Lauren Chen thought it was hilarious. She wrote, “Not sure what’s funnier: >AOC taking metaphors literally >AOC, a former bartender who is now a congressman, dismissing the idea of pulling yourself up by the bootstraps.”
Not sure what's funnier: >AOC taking metaphors literally >AOC, a former bartender who is now a congressman, dismissing the idea of pulling yourself up by the bootstraps https://t.co/VuMYnlEmtR — Lauren Chen (@TheLaurenChen) February 6, 2020
There were also many tweets mocking Rep. Ocasio-Cortez by pretending to not understand metaphors. They were under the hashtag #AOCsplaining.
Here’s a sample:
Did you have to get plastic surgery? Did your butt get caught in the bar's blender at work. How else would you work it off? It doesn't make any sense! It's so stupid! #Aocsplaining https://t.co/SwiO2cgh3R — Saving Ferris ⚕ (@StreetDoc_67) February 6, 2020
I worked my fingers to the bone, and now I'll never be able to play the guitar again.#AOCsplaining — Mike Out Yonder (@AmericanusMax) February 7, 2020
no one could actually bite a bullet. YOU WOULD DIE #AOCsplaining — Ryan "wheels" Casten (@rcasten1983) February 6, 2020
If you walk a mile in someone else's shoes, your feet might hurt and you're a mile away from your own shoes. #AOCsplaining — Russ Johnson (@RussJohnsonMD) February 7, 2020
How can a pen be mightier then the sword..when the sword is so much bigger then the pen, obviously the sword is mightier..#AOCsplaining — DragonHighLord76 The Duke-Captain ???☠☠⚔♤ (@Dragonhighking1) February 7, 2020
Make a mountain out of a molehill? That’s impossible. Do you know low large a mountain is? Do you know how small a molehill is? You’d be dead before you get enough molehills to make mountain. #AOCsplaining — Steve Campbell (@ReformedWriter) February 7, 2020
It is physically impossible to zip my lips. MY LIPS DO NOT HAVE A ZIPPER, MOM.#AOCsplaining — Gege (@Pomquat) February 7, 2020
How can you possibly pinch pennies??? I've held pennies between my fingers. They're, like hard, and junk! And even if you could, they don't let out a yelp or anything! As if….!!!! #AOCsplaining — Trad-Hubby (@Machovell1an) February 7, 2020
I mean, imagine how much blood you would have if you put your nose to the grindstone. No one does that. It would also make the grindstone messy. And what's a grindstone anyway? #AOCsplaining — Java Joe (@JavaJoeX) February 7, 2020
How can you believe any thing a little bird tells you? LITTLE BIRDS CAN’T TALK #AOCsplaining — Gege (@Pomquat) February 7, 2020
How does anyone wake up at the crack of dawn???? I never heard a crack when the Sun came up. It's totes quiet and you'll sleep right through it!!! #AOCsplaining — Trad-Hubby (@Machovell1an) February 7, 2020
A couple of Twitter users had a whole lot of fun with this hashtag:
A bird in the hand is not worth two in the bush. Everyone knows two of something is worth more than one of that thing.#AOCsplaining — Eric Spencer (@JustEric) February 7, 2020
A penny saved is not a penny earned because you already earned it and now you're saving it. Also, saving pennies is stupid because they're barely worth a nickel.#AOCsplaining — Eric Spencer (@JustEric) February 7, 2020
Birds of a feather flock together? All birds have feathers. Do you see them all flocking together? And what is flocking anyway?#AOCsplaining — Eric Spencer (@JustEric) February 7, 2020
If you beat a dead horse you'll get blood and stuff all over. #AOCsplaining pic.twitter.com/euCM8X10nX — T'ssaNga?FebruaryFeels? (@T_tothe2ndNGa) February 6, 2020
Straws are really light. They can't break a camel's back. #AOCsplaining — T'ssaNga?FebruaryFeels? (@T_tothe2ndNGa) February 7, 2020
You can't drive someone up the wall cause cars won't drive on walls. ?♀#AOCsplaining — T'ssaNga?FebruaryFeels? (@T_tothe2ndNGa) February 7, 2020
If you've got ants in your pants you need to stop sitting on the ground. Duh.#AOCsplaining — T'ssaNga?FebruaryFeels? (@T_tothe2ndNGa) February 7, 2020
The Media(D) keeps saying that conservatives are obsessed with AOC. It’s not that it’s an obsession, it’s just that she says so many wrong things and does it in such a spectacularly bad way that it’s difficult to ignore her.
She has the singular ability of being a true believer of all things progressive, completely incapable of coherent thought, while being loudly and obnoxiously asserting her ignorance as knowledge.
If I didn’t know better, I’d think that this was just the best performance art that I’ve ever seen… but she’s simply not bright enough to pull off an act like that for this long.


clashdaily--2020-02-07--American Communists Call for a Violent Takeover.. and the American People are Ready for Them

It is uncomfortable to face violent threats .
We endure that discomfort because it is better to face them than run from them .
Communists in the US have flocked to Senator Bernie Sanders ’ campaign , and the things they want to do are horrible .
Fortunately , we ’ ve faced threats like this before and we ’ re prepared to face them again .
The US model of limited government and an empowered people is up to the dangerous task of defending liberty .
We are made for this .
I ’ m not going to put @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Project Veritas recorded many Sanders ’ staffers in candid conversations .
These are their words , not mine .
Please see my sources and listen to the Communists in their own words .
It is worth your time to read what they said- “ Well , the Gulags were founded as Re-Education Camps…What will help is when we send all the Republicans to the Re-Education Camps.
” “ I ’ m ready to start tearing bricks up and start fighting..
I ’ ll straight up get armed..
I ’ m ready for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rich.
” Trending : John Kerry Says That The ENTIRE Obama Admin Was Trying To Get Rid Of The Burisma Prosecutor “ The Soviet Union was not horrible…I mean , for women ’ s rights the Soviet Union – I think – the most progressive place to date in the world.
” “ So , do we just cease – do we just dissolve the Senate , House of Representatives , the Judicial Branch , and have something Bernie Sanders and a cabinet of people , make all decisions for the climate ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” “ ..I think the goal is just to build a..coalition… Their politics fall outside of the American norm , so their politics are Marxist/Leninist.. they have more of a mind for ‘ direct action ’ for engaging in politics outside of the electoral system.
” “ …Once we break up Google , YouTube , Facebook , nationalize these things , then that would be a huge thing forward so far as education stuff goes.
” “ We would need a federal government and labor union movement that is working together to strip @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violence toward property.
” “ ..it ’ s gon na take militancy…like a militant labor movement that ’ s willing to…strike , and if necessary , you know , just destroy property and things like that.
” “ A militant labor movement is kind of.. our last real chance before we try other means.
” “ After we abolish landlords , we don ’ t have to kill them , that ’ s my feeling I think it ’ s damaging to the soul , but um , there were plenty of excesses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would hope to avoid.
” “ We don ’ t want to scare people off , you first have to feel it out before you get into the crazy stuff…You know we were talking about more extreme organizations like Antifa , you were talking about , Yellow Vests , all that but we ’ re kinda keeping that on the back-burner for now.
” “ It ’ s unfortunate that we have to make plans for extreme action but like I said , they ’ re not going to give it to us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Sanders campaign said they would take power by force once elected , or burn cities if the convention , or the voters , rejected their candidate .
Politicians who still call themselves Democrats also want ordinary citizens disarmed .
That strange coincidence is no coincidence at all .
Bernie ’ s campaign workers are not alone in their ideas .
Their fellow communists , the Ruling Council in China , said Americans should be disarmed .
Remember that the Chinese government killed over 10 thousand unarmed students who were protesting in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to bring that level of terror here .
I ’ ll remind you that 10 thousand dead students at is a mere dust mote when compared to the 45 million people the Chinese government killed during Mao ’ s “ Great Leap ” .
The Bernie Bros think a few million corpses here in the United States will bend us to their will .
Communists Utopia is always a few million corpses away .
Governments have power and governments have money .
They have both at the point of a gun .
Our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A was supposed to stop the excesses of government by leaving power , both political and martial , with the people .
No wonder the Communists want us disarmed .
When the one percent disarm the 99 percent , then the 1 percent have all the power .
We shouldn ’ t be surprised by this political turn towards totalitarianism .
The Sanders ’ approach is a logical extension of Obama ’ s ideas .
A government large enough to give you want you want has to be large enough to take everything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Democrats used the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice as political tools against their enemies .
Democrats broke the medical-service-sector in the US with Obamacare .
Today , Democrats propose to disarm and regulate honest US citizens .
Billionaires like Soros and Bloomberg buy state legislatures while political parties prostitute themselves for campaign donations .
Political operatives manipulate election results in the US .
Now , socialists want more power and more control.. and shallow headline surfers agree .
Senator and presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has some campaign staffers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elections .
They will take power at the end of a gun .
A public school teacher in North Carolina told her class that Vice President Mike Pence should be shot in the head .
I wonder if that point of view is fairly common amongst her union leaders .
It is time we listened to them and believed what they say .
The Socialists fantasy ignores the American People .
We are not going quietly .
In fact , we ’ re not going along with them at all .
We won @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and our children ’ s lives , to government thugs .
We were made for this , and the power lies with us , not with them .
I mean it .
The second amendment doesn ’ t leave us armed to hunt deer , but to hunt tyrants .
Read it for yourself .
It is a terrible power reserved for terrible times , times that violent communists want to bring here .
You won ’ t let it happen .
“ A well regulated Militia , being necessary to the security @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the people to keep and bear Arms , shall not be infringed.
” ~_~_~_

It is uncomfortable to face violent threats. We endure that discomfort because it is better to face them than run from them. Communists in the US have flocked to Senator Bernie Sanders’ campaign, and the things they want to do are horrible. Fortunately, we’ve faced threats like this before and we’re prepared to face them again. The US model of limited government and an empowered people is up to the dangerous task of defending liberty. We are made for this.
I’m not going to put words in the mouth of American Communists. Project Veritas recorded many Sanders’ staffers in candid conversations. These are their words, not mine. Please see my sources and listen to the Communists in their own words. It is worth your time to read what they said-
“Well, the Gulags were founded as Re-Education Camps…What will help is when we send all the Republicans to the Re-Education Camps.”
“I’m ready to start tearing bricks up and start fighting.. I’ll straight up get armed.. I’m ready for the f*cking revolution, bro.. Guillotine the rich.”
“The Soviet Union was not horrible…I mean, for women’s rights the Soviet Union – I think – the most progressive place to date in the world.”
“So, do we just cease – do we just dissolve the Senate, House of Representatives, the Judicial Branch, and have something Bernie Sanders and a cabinet of people, make all decisions for the climate? I mean, I’m serious.”
“..I think the goal is just to build a..coalition… Their politics fall outside of the American norm, so their politics are Marxist/Leninist.. they have more of a mind for ‘direct action’ for engaging in politics outside of the electoral system.”
“…Once we break up Google, YouTube, Facebook, nationalize these things, then that would be a huge thing forward so far as education stuff goes.”
“We would need a federal government and labor union movement that is working together to strip power away from capitalists and preferably directing violence toward property.”
“..it’s gonna take militancy…like a militant labor movement that’s willing to…strike, and if necessary, you know, just destroy property and things like that.”
“A militant labor movement is kind of.. our last real chance before we try other means.”
“After we abolish landlords, we don’t have to kill them, that’s my feeling I think it’s damaging to the soul, but um, there were plenty of excesses in 1917 (Russian Revolution) I would hope to avoid.”
“We don’t want to scare people off, you first have to feel it out before you get into the crazy stuff…You know we were talking about more extreme organizations like Antifa, you were talking about, Yellow Vests, all that but we’re kinda keeping that on the back-burner for now.”
“It’s unfortunate that we have to make plans for extreme action but like I said, they’re not going to give it to us even if Bernie is elected.”
Communists in the Sanders campaign said they would take power by force once elected, or burn cities if the convention, or the voters, rejected their candidate. Politicians who still call themselves Democrats also want ordinary citizens disarmed. That strange coincidence is no coincidence at all.
Bernie’s campaign workers are not alone in their ideas. Their fellow communists, the Ruling Council in China, said Americans should be disarmed. Remember that the Chinese government killed over 10 thousand unarmed students who were protesting in Tiananmen Square. The Bernie Bros want to bring that level of terror here. I’ll remind you that 10 thousand dead students at is a mere dust mote when compared to the 45 million people the Chinese government killed during Mao’s “Great Leap”. The Bernie Bros think a few million corpses here in the United States will bend us to their will.
Communists Utopia is always a few million corpses away.
Governments have power and governments have money. They have both at the point of a gun. Our system of government in the US of A was supposed to stop the excesses of government by leaving power, both political and martial, with the people. No wonder the Communists want us disarmed.
When the one percent disarm the 99 percent, then the 1 percent have all the power.
We shouldn’t be surprised by this political turn towards totalitarianism. The Sanders’ approach is a logical extension of Obama’s ideas. A government large enough to give you want you want has to be large enough to take everything you have. Under President’ Obama, the Democrats used the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice as political tools against their enemies. Democrats broke the medical-service-sector in the US with Obamacare. Today, Democrats propose to disarm and regulate honest US citizens. Billionaires like Soros and Bloomberg buy state legislatures while political parties prostitute themselves for campaign donations. Political operatives manipulate election results in the US.
Now, socialists want more power and more control.. and shallow headline surfers agree.
Senator and presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has some campaign staffers who want a simpler solution than winning elections. They will take power at the end of a gun. A public school teacher in North Carolina told her class that Vice President Mike Pence should be shot in the head. I wonder if that point of view is fairly common amongst her union leaders. It is time we listened to them and believed what they say.
The Socialists fantasy ignores the American People. We are not going quietly. In fact, we’re not going along with them at all. We won’t turn over our lives, and our children’s lives, to government thugs. We were made for this, and the power lies with us, not with them. I mean it.
The second amendment doesn’t leave us armed to hunt deer, but to hunt tyrants. Read it for yourself. It is a terrible power reserved for terrible times, times that violent communists want to bring here. You won’t let it happen.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
~_~_~_
Sources-
“https://amgreatness.com/2019/09/04/antifa-gives-progressives-a-tin-pot-dictator-high/
“https://www.projectveritasaction.com/2020/01/21/expose-2020-another-bernie-2020-field-organizer-ill-straight-up-get-armedim-ready-for-the-fing-revolutionguillotine-the-rich-praises-the-so/
“https://www.projectveritasaction.com/2020/01/28/expose-2020-two-more-bernie-2020-field-organizers-in-south-carolina-sanders-campaign-attracts-truly-radical-people-have-to-make-plans-for-extreme-action/
“https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-usa-guns-idUSKCN1G703W
“https://dailypoliticalnewswire.com/report-high-school-teacher-tells-class-mike-pence-needs-shot-in-the-head/
“https://www.redstate.com/diary/republican_michigander/2010/04/21/dont-let-soros-and-the-secretary-of-state-project-take-over-your-state/
“https://www.foxnews.com/politics/app-used-in-iowa-democratic-caucus-fiasco-linked-to-former-clinton-campaign


clashdaily--2020-02-07--Saying No to Black History Month

Saying No to Black History Month

Here we are again folks .
February , another Black History Month .
Progressives expect my fellow blacks and me to happily celebrate our month .
I will not .
BHM is nothing more than a political weapon for Democrats/progressives to spread racial hate and further their lie that America is the greatest source of evil on the planet .
Most American blacks do not realize that many original civil rights black freedom fighters who stood beside Dr Martin Luther King Jr sold their souls to the dark-side after Dr King died .
They joined the white Democrat/progressive movement , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The agenda of the dark-side is anti-Christianity and anti-American .
Black civil rights youths like Jesse Jackson abandoned Dr King ’ s divinely inspired mission for blacks to be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin .
Instead , the post MLK black civil rights movement became all about skin-color , exploiting it in every way .
Suddenly , Jesse Jackson and other racism-pimps became rich by claiming every problem plaguing blacks in America is the result of racism .
Terrified corporations paid-off Jackson and other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trending : John Kerry Says That The ENTIRE Obama Admin Was Trying To Get Rid Of The Burisma Prosecutor Remember , when Jesse Jackson tried to extort Major League baseball ?
Jackson claimed MLB was racist because not enough blacks attended games .
Scratching my head , I do not understand how MLB is at fault .
I don ’ t know if Jackson got paid or not .
Democrats gave Jesse Jackson , Al Sharpton and other black traitors seats of power at their table .
Their job was to keep convincing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of rabidly racist America .
Therefore , blacks ’ only hope is to keep voting for Democrats to push back against America ’ s mission to terminate them .
Sadly , blacks are terminating themselves by insanely supporting Democrat/progressives ’ support of Planned Parenthood .
Folks , Democrat/progressives ’ lie about America is extremely evil and destructive , generating racial-hate and violence .
America is the greatest land of opportunity on the planet for all who choose to pursue their dreams !
Cities controlled by Democrats for the past 40 years are a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , failing schools , high black incarceration and high fatherless black households .
And yet , anyone , black or white , who suggests solutions to empower blacks to fix their problems is immediately attacked by Democrats/progressives .
These compassionate Americans are branded either Uncle Tom or racist .
Democrats/progressives want blacks totally dependent and thus enslaved to government .
Black empowerment and liberation is not their goal .
Their goal is to transform America into the progressives ’ utopia .
This is why Democrats/progressives seek to destroy patriotic self-reliant black role models @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , education and making right choices ; Justice Clarence Thomas , GOP presidential candidates Dr. Ben Carson and Herman Cain to name a few .
Every Black History Month progressives beat us over the head with their insidious evil lie that America is still a hellhole of racism .
They ignore the huge elephant in the room that white America bypassed the normal vetting process to gift the first black president two terms .
Progressives love multimillionaire black celebs and billionaire Oprah who absurdly claim blacks are enduring the same discrimination they suffered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have many blacks believing Democrats ’ crazy lie that the 63 million who elected Trump are white supremacists .
A college professor black buddy teaches at two Maryland colleges , one is predominantly white and the other is predominantly black .
He worked his way through college and grad school , enjoying a successful career in advertising before becoming a professor .
In almost a whisper , he said , “ I have noticed that my white students don ’ t mind working for what they want .
My black students view themselves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ given to them.
” Tragically , my buddy ’ s black students are infected with poisoned mindsets , caused by causal contact at an indoctrination camp disguised as an institution of higher learning .
Black students are taught they are victims of racist white America .
Therefore , they are entitled .
“ MAGA ” cap wearers nor Republicans dare not set foot on their campus .
My younger brother Jerry is an extremely fearless and outspoken Christian and black conservative Republican .
He routinely verbally spars with members of his all-black Baltimore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opponents speechless because their arguments are rooted in emotion and Democrat/fake news media lies .
Jerry ’ s arguments are rooted in love , truth and facts .
Having a little fun , Jerry sent me this text .
“ Good morning .
I changed my mind .
I ’ m voting for the democrats .
My debts paid , free checks , don ’ t have to work , I can legally smoke weed , and no responsibility .
Plus , knowing the dems , there ’ s probably more benefits to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any better than that.
” Thank God Jerry understands that the Democratic Party has become a hateful mob of scam artists .
No , I will not be celebrating Democrats/progressives ’ Black History/America Sucks Month .

Here we are again folks. February, another Black History Month. Progressives expect my fellow blacks and me to happily celebrate our month. I will not.
BHM is nothing more than a political weapon for Democrats/progressives to spread racial hate and further their lie that America is the greatest source of evil on the planet.
Most American blacks do not realize that many original civil rights black freedom fighters who stood beside Dr Martin Luther King Jr sold their souls to the dark-side after Dr King died. They joined the white Democrat/progressive movement, metaphorically receiving 30 pieces of silver. The agenda of the dark-side is anti-Christianity and anti-American.
Black civil rights youths like Jesse Jackson abandoned Dr King’s divinely inspired mission for blacks to be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. Instead, the post MLK black civil rights movement became all about skin-color, exploiting it in every way. Suddenly, Jesse Jackson and other racism-pimps became rich by claiming every problem plaguing blacks in America is the result of racism. Terrified corporations paid-off Jackson and other race-hustlers to shut-up and back off.
Remember, when Jesse Jackson tried to extort Major League baseball? Jackson claimed MLB was racist because not enough blacks attended games. Scratching my head, I do not understand how MLB is at fault. I don’t know if Jackson got paid or not.
Democrats gave Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and other black traitors seats of power at their table. Their job was to keep convincing blacks that they will always be victims of rabidly racist America. Therefore, blacks’ only hope is to keep voting for Democrats to push back against America’s mission to terminate them. Sadly, blacks are terminating themselves by insanely supporting Democrat/progressives’ support of Planned Parenthood.
Folks, Democrat/progressives’ lie about America is extremely evil and destructive, generating racial-hate and violence. America is the greatest land of opportunity on the planet for all who choose to pursue their dreams!
Cities controlled by Democrats for the past 40 years are a mess; record-breaking black on black homicides, failing schools, high black incarceration and high fatherless black households. And yet, anyone, black or white, who suggests solutions to empower blacks to fix their problems is immediately attacked by Democrats/progressives. These compassionate Americans are branded either Uncle Tom or racist.
Democrats/progressives want blacks totally dependent and thus enslaved to government. Black empowerment and liberation is not their goal. Their goal is to transform America into the progressives’ utopia. This is why Democrats/progressives seek to destroy patriotic self-reliant black role models who achieved outstanding success via hard work, education and making right choices; Justice Clarence Thomas, GOP presidential candidates Dr. Ben Carson and Herman Cain to name a few.
Every Black History Month progressives beat us over the head with their insidious evil lie that America is still a hellhole of racism. They ignore the huge elephant in the room that white America bypassed the normal vetting process to gift the first black president two terms.
Progressives love multimillionaire black celebs and billionaire Oprah who absurdly claim blacks are enduring the same discrimination they suffered in the 1950s. These useful-idiot hatemongers have many blacks believing Democrats’ crazy lie that the 63 million who elected Trump are white supremacists.
A college professor black buddy teaches at two Maryland colleges, one is predominantly white and the other is predominantly black. He worked his way through college and grad school, enjoying a successful career in advertising before becoming a professor.
In almost a whisper, he said, “I have noticed that my white students don’t mind working for what they want. My black students view themselves as entitled and believe everything should be given to them.”
Tragically, my buddy’s black students are infected with poisoned mindsets, caused by causal contact at an indoctrination camp disguised as an institution of higher learning. Black students are taught they are victims of racist white America. Therefore, they are entitled. “MAGA” cap wearers nor Republicans dare not set foot on their campus.
My younger brother Jerry is an extremely fearless and outspoken Christian and black conservative Republican. He routinely verbally spars with members of his all-black Baltimore Trump-hating church. He always leaves his opponents speechless because their arguments are rooted in emotion and Democrat/fake news media lies. Jerry’s arguments are rooted in love, truth and facts.
Having a little fun, Jerry sent me this text. “Good morning. I changed my mind. I’m voting for the democrats. My debts paid, free checks, don’t have to work, I can legally smoke weed, and no responsibility. Plus, knowing the dems, there’s probably more benefits to come. It doesn’t get any better than that.”
Thank God Jerry understands that the Democratic Party has become a hateful mob of scam artists. No, I will not be celebrating Democrats/progressives’ Black History/America Sucks Month.
Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American
Help Lloyd spread the Truth
http://LloydMarcus.com


clashdaily--2020-02-06--Husband Claims He Threw $1M Cash In A Bonfire Rather Than Pay His Ex And Kids

This may sound like a crazy 80s movie plot , but it happened right here in our backyard .
One businessman in Canada ’ s capital took extreme action to keep his money from going to his ex in an ( obviously ) acrimonious divorce proceedings .
Less than 2 years ago , he was running to be mayor of Ottawa .
Now , he ’ s facing the wrath of a judge for what he did with all his money .
He was quite a rags-to-riches a success story .
An excerpt of a story about him from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : John Kerry Says That The ENTIRE Obama Admin Was Trying To Get Rid Of The Burisma Prosecutor McConville makes clear that he is not a run-of-the-mill garage owner , but a serious entrepreneur .
He started a business in a wooden shack in 1981 , and over the last 37 years built it into a successful 16-bay garage that is one of the largest independent repair shops in the city .
Today , his garage employs 11 full-time workers and five part-timers in the fall .
The garage has 33 loaners for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 2 million .
He also owns property around town .
Source : OttawaCitizen The divorce court judge took aim at his finances , and he was what you might call ‘ uncooperative ’ .
Bruce McConville , 55 , has long defied a court order to file an affidavit about the state of his finances , meaning authorities are unable to figure out what he owes in child and spousal support .
As a result , McConville hasn ’ t paid anything to his ex-wife .
He is also accused of ignoring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ court $ 300,000 as a security , and he has defied a further court order telling him not to sell his properties .
McConville appeared in court at a contempt motion on January 28 , where he told Superior Court Justice Kevin Phillips he sold both properties and businesses before withdrawing a total of $ 1,050,000 CAD ( £583,565 ) in cash through 25 withdrawals from six different bank accounts .
He said he had the ATM receipts to prove he withdrew the cash , but he no longer had the $ 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Phillips .
Source : EC So , where can $ 1 Million dollars disappear to ?
That depends who you believe .
If you buy the husband ’ s explanation , the short answer is this : McConville ’ s explanation that he set fire to the missing million was revealed during a contempt motion last week before Superior Court Justice Kevin Phillips .
McConville told Phillips he withdrew a total of $ 1,050,000 through as many as 25 withdrawals from six bank accounts — and had the receipts to back up his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cash .
“ You ’ ve lost me .
What do you mean ?
” the judge asked .
McConville rambled and spoke of anxiety about a relationship with a daughter .
“ Can I back you up a bit ?
When you say you destroyed it , what do you mean ?
” the judge asked .
“ To the tune of how much ?
” the judge probed .
“ In total , about a million and thirty-nine thousand dollars , ” McConville said .
( McConville later said he burned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Ottawa Citizen He didn ’ t film the destruction and has no way of proving it ever happened .
The Judge , therefore , is calling BS on his story , and threw him in the cooler for 30 days , to sort out his story , with threats of much worse to come if he doesn ’ t come clean with the courts .

This may sound like a crazy 80s movie plot, but it happened right here in our backyard.
One businessman in Canada’s capital took extreme action to keep his money from going to his ex in an (obviously) acrimonious divorce proceedings.
Less than 2 years ago, he was running to be mayor of Ottawa. Now, he’s facing the wrath of a judge for what he did with all his money.
He was quite a rags-to-riches a success story. An excerpt of a story about him from the time of his mayoral bid:
McConville makes clear that he is not a run-of-the-mill garage owner, but a serious entrepreneur. He started a business in a wooden shack in 1981, and over the last 37 years built it into a successful 16-bay garage that is one of the largest independent repair shops in the city. Today, his garage employs 11 full-time workers and five part-timers in the fall. The garage has 33 loaners for customers and his inventory is worth some $2 million. He also owns property around town.
Source: OttawaCitizen
The divorce court judge took aim at his finances, and he was what you might call ‘uncooperative’.
Bruce McConville, 55, has long defied a court order to file an affidavit about the state of his finances, meaning authorities are unable to figure out what he owes in child and spousal support. As a result, McConville hasn’t paid anything to his ex-wife. He is also accused of ignoring a Superior Court order to pay the court $300,000 as a security, and he has defied a further court order telling him not to sell his properties. McConville appeared in court at a contempt motion on January 28, where he told Superior Court Justice Kevin Phillips he sold both properties and businesses before withdrawing a total of $1,050,000 CAD (£583,565) in cash through 25 withdrawals from six different bank accounts. He said he had the ATM receipts to prove he withdrew the cash, but he no longer had the $1 million – a claim that confused Justice Phillips.
Source: EC
So, where can $1 Million dollars disappear to? That depends who you believe.
If you buy the husband’s explanation, the short answer is this:
McConville’s explanation that he set fire to the missing million was revealed during a contempt motion last week before Superior Court Justice Kevin Phillips. McConville told Phillips he withdrew a total of $1,050,000 through as many as 25 withdrawals from six bank accounts — and had the receipts to back up his claim — but no longer had the cash. “So where’s the money now? Phillips pressed. “I destroyed it,” McConville replied. “You’ve lost me. What do you mean?” the judge asked. McConville rambled and spoke of anxiety about a relationship with a daughter. “Can I back you up a bit? When you say you destroyed it, what do you mean?” the judge asked. “I burnt it,” McConville explained. “To the tune of how much?” the judge probed. “In total, about a million and thirty-nine thousand dollars,” McConville said. (McConville later said he burned $1,050,000 in all.)
Source: Ottawa Citizen
He didn’t film the destruction and has no way of proving it ever happened.
The Judge, therefore, is calling BS on his story, and threw him in the cooler for 30 days, to sort out his story, with threats of much worse to come if he doesn’t come clean with the courts.


clashdaily--2020-02-07--WATCH: Li’l Mike Bloomberg Has A Harvey Weinstein Problem

Will the Media ask the hard questions this brings up ?
Or will they run interference for this too ?
Most of us are old enough to remember when the Democrat media were desperately trying to tie Trump to an endorsement he got from antisemite David Duke , no matter HOW many times he has openly denounced Duke ’ s racism over the years .
These same Media ( D ) don ’ t seem to notice when David Duke endorsed Keith Ellison and Ilhan Omar .
The ( R ) vs ( D ) double-standard for Media guilt-by-association smears @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( D ) are trying to hide anymore .
And that ’ s not even getting into how the Democrats swept away their hero Robert Byrd ’ s ACTUAL record as a member of — and recruiter for — the KKK , while all the Democrat luminaries eulogized him .
Which brings us to Harvey Weinstein — another celebrated Democrat luminary with a scandalized history and his rather close associations with a billionaire Democrat 2020 hopeful .
How this will affect his attempt to woo the ‘ woke ’ Left that already have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anybody ’ s guess .
But his reputation for saying ‘ un-woke ’ things about women will not help him any .
Mini Mike is likewise accused of having a ‘ frat culture ’ in his company : Whether or not he ever sees the inside of a jail cell for the way he ’ s ever treated women , he has taken a hit that someone of his ego and prestige may find even harder to deal with .
A second woman has stated — under oath — that he wasn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Here ’ s the description one of his accusers gave : Mann told the court : ‘ The first time I saw him naked I thought he was deformed or intersex .
I didn ’ t know if he was a burn victim but it would make sense .
He does not have testicles and it appears like he has a vagina .
He does have a penis .
Mann added : ‘ He also peed on me once .
It was like being discarded after I served a purpose ’ .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mann said : ‘ It was bad .
He smelled like s*** , excuse me , poop ’ .
Source : DailyMail

Will the Media ask the hard questions this brings up? Or will they run interference for this too?
Most of us are old enough to remember when the Democrat media were desperately trying to tie Trump to an endorsement he got from antisemite David Duke, no matter HOW many times he has openly denounced Duke’s racism over the years. These same Media(D) don’t seem to notice when David Duke endorsed Keith Ellison and Ilhan Omar.
The (R) vs (D) double-standard for Media guilt-by-association smears isn’t even something the Media(D) are trying to hide anymore. And that’s not even getting into how the Democrats swept away their hero Robert Byrd’s ACTUAL record as a member of — and recruiter for — the KKK, while all the Democrat luminaries eulogized him.
Which brings us to Harvey Weinstein — another celebrated Democrat luminary with a scandalized history and his rather close associations with a billionaire Democrat 2020 hopeful.
?????? Harvey Weinstein thanking Mike Bloomberg for all the help before making some sex jokes on stage pic.twitter.com/cVnOg2j2oj — Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug) February 7, 2020
“Thank-you Mayor Bloomberg.”
How this will affect his attempt to woo the ‘woke’ Left that already have a natural hostility to wealthy businessmen is anybody’s guess. But his reputation for saying ‘un-woke’ things about women will not help him any.
‘I’d Do Her’: Mike Bloomberg and the Underbelly of #MeToo
Disparaging comments. Demeaning jokes. As the mogul reportedly considers a 2020 presidential run, it remains an open question whether his long-alleged history of undermining women will affect his chances.
Headline from TheAtlantic
‘Look at the ass on her’: Michael Bloomberg’s comments about women under scrutiny as he enters 2020 race
Former New York mayor is yet to apologise for sexist comments
Headline from Independent
Mini Mike is likewise accused of having a ‘frat culture’ in his company:
A former Bloomberg executive who took over the job of a man ousted in a sex scandal claims in court that she had to resign because of the company’s “fraternity-fashioned corporate culture.” — Source Courthouse News, 2018
Speaking of Weinstein…
Whether or not he ever sees the inside of a jail cell for the way he’s ever treated women, he has taken a hit that someone of his ego and prestige may find even harder to deal with.
A second woman has stated — under oath — that he wasn’t your ordinary guy below the belt. Here’s the description one of his accusers gave:


clashdaily--2020-02-07--STILL WINNING: Courts Give Trump Haters Some MORE Bad News

It ’ s already been a helluva week for Trump .
And it just got better again .
Another or the tactics to take Trump down just got slapped down .
They ’ re just grasping at straws now… and they keep coming up empty .
This time , it ’ s with the court decision against those who were trying to leverage the Emoluments Clause against President Trump .
A federal appeals court on Friday dismissed Democratic lawmakers ’ lawsuit against President Donald Trump alleging he has violated the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution on technical grounds .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Poll Has NEVER Recorded This Level Of Economic Optimism In the ruling , the three-judge panel of the U.S .
Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia found the members of Congress did not have legal standing to bring suit against the president for violating the clause , which bars federal officials from collecting payments from foreign governments without approval of Congress .
In their unsigned ruling , the judges cited Supreme Court precedent , noting the 215 lawmakers on the suit are not the majority of Congress , and that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had filed suit as a majority .
“ [ O ] nly an institution can assert an institutional injury , ” the ruling says .
“ Here , regardless of rigor , our conclusion is straightforward because the members — 29 senators and 186 members of the House of Representatives — do not constitute a majority of either body and are , therefore , powerless to approve or deny the president ’ s acceptance of foreign emoluments , ” the decision says .
Source : NBC So , the Democrats tried to take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the provisions of the Constitution got in their way .
They never learned that lesson from ‘ Batman Begins ’ : They ’ ve sacrificed sure footing for a killing stroke .
Then again , we shouldn ’ t expect rational behavior from a group so deeply afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome .
After all… Nadler is already looking to keep the Impeachment fight going .
It ’ s as though they ’ re trying to prove to even the harshest skeptics that yes , indeed , the Democrats are interested in destroying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rather than reasons of justice .
We ’ ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ choose someone , with a less than stellar past , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

It’s already been a helluva week for Trump. And it just got better again. Another or the tactics to take Trump down just got slapped down.
They’re just grasping at straws now… and they keep coming up empty.
This time, it’s with the court decision against those who were trying to leverage the Emoluments Clause against President Trump.
A federal appeals court on Friday dismissed Democratic lawmakers’ lawsuit against President Donald Trump alleging he has violated the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution on technical grounds. In the ruling, the three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia found the members of Congress did not have legal standing to bring suit against the president for violating the clause, which bars federal officials from collecting payments from foreign governments without approval of Congress. In their unsigned ruling, the judges cited Supreme Court precedent, noting the 215 lawmakers on the suit are not the majority of Congress, and that they might have had standing if they had filed suit as a majority. “[O]nly an institution can assert an institutional injury,” the ruling says. “Here, regardless of rigor, our conclusion is straightforward because the members — 29 senators and 186 members of the House of Representatives — do not constitute a majority of either body and are, therefore, powerless to approve or deny the president’s acceptance of foreign emoluments,” the decision says.
Source: NBC
So, the Democrats tried to take Trump down again.
And again, the provisions of the Constitution got in their way.
They never learned that lesson from ‘Batman Begins’: They’ve sacrificed sure footing for a killing stroke.
Then again, we shouldn’t expect rational behavior from a group so deeply afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome.
After all… Nadler is already looking to keep the Impeachment fight going.
It’s as though they’re trying to prove to even the harshest skeptics that yes, indeed, the Democrats are interested in destroying Trump for personal and political reasons, rather than reasons of justice.
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-02-07--You’re Fired: Alexander Vindman Turfed From National Security Council

The guy who played such a key role in the impeachment proceedings will soon be leaving the White House , say reports .
Alexander ‘ Don ’ t call me Mister ’ Vindman , who was instructed NOT to tell House Republicans which intelligence official he had shared his information with , was almost certainly the link that gave the ‘ whistleblower ’ the details he needed to kick off the Impeachment proceedings .
This announcement is no longer set to happen some time ‘ soon ’ .
It has now become a reality .
Per @ ALX of TPUSA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gallup Poll Has NEVER Recorded This Level Of Economic Optimism BREAKING : Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman has been escorted out of the White House by security and has been told his services are no longer needed .
We never got the chance to test the obvious theory that impeachment was a deliberate and coordinated conspiracy to oust the President because Schiff deliberately disallowed any such questions… even though he himself was implicated in any potential conspiracy as , at minimum , a ‘ fact witness ’ .
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s impeachment inquiry , has told colleagues he expects to leave the White House ’ s National Security Council in the coming weeks to return to the Defense Department , a source tells CNN .
Vindman said his departure from the council could come as soon as this month , the source said .
That would be well ahead of the scheduled end of his time at the White House , which was originally slated to last until July .
Vindman was appointed to his post in July 2018 and was asked to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did not say whether Vindman ’ s departure was voluntary or at the behest of the White House , though aides inside the West Wing had speculated it could come soon as the impeachment trial was over .
…Vindman ’ s duties were significantly curtailed after he testified — as were his those of his brother , an attorney for the council , according to sources familiar with the situation .
Source : StLouisPostDispatch WATCH : Rand Paul Won ’ t Be Silenced — Reads His ‘ Censored ’ Question Into The Public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ For Testifying In Uniform

The guy who played such a key role in the impeachment proceedings will soon be leaving the White House, say reports.
Alexander ‘Don’t call me Mister’ Vindman, who was instructed NOT to tell House Republicans which intelligence official he had shared his information with, was almost certainly the link that gave the ‘whistleblower’ the details he needed to kick off the Impeachment proceedings.
***Update***
This announcement is no longer set to happen some time ‘soon’. It has now become a reality. Per @ALX of TPUSA:
BREAKING: Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman has been escorted out of the White House by security and has been told his services are no longer needed.
**Update 2**
Vindman’s twin brother and Gordon Sondland have been thrown out.
***End Update***
We never got the chance to test the obvious theory that impeachment was a deliberate and coordinated conspiracy to oust the President because Schiff deliberately disallowed any such questions… even though he himself was implicated in any potential conspiracy as, at minimum, a ‘fact witness’.
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a key witness in President Donald Trump’s impeachment inquiry, has told colleagues he expects to leave the White House’s National Security Council in the coming weeks to return to the Defense Department, a source tells CNN. Vindman said his departure from the council could come as soon as this month, the source said. That would be well ahead of the scheduled end of his time at the White House, which was originally slated to last until July. Vindman was appointed to his post in July 2018 and was asked to stay for two years. The source did not say whether Vindman’s departure was voluntary or at the behest of the White House, though aides inside the West Wing had speculated it could come soon as the impeachment trial was over. …Vindman’s duties were significantly curtailed after he testified — as were his those of his brother, an attorney for the council, according to sources familiar with the situation.
Source: StLouisPostDispatch
Related…
WATCH: Rand Paul Won’t Be Silenced — Reads His ‘Censored’ Question Into The Public Record
Vindeman Takes Heat From Fellow Soldiers For Testifying In Uniform


clashdaily--2020-02-07--Chick Who Invoked Red Flag Law In Colorado Gets Arrested For Perjury

This was an example of precisely the malicious abuse of red flag laws that made 2A proponents object to them in the first place .
A woman whose son was shot dead on an encounter with police attempted to use Colorado ’ s Red Flag laws to strip one officer of his lawful right to bear arms .
The problem with her complaint was that she had to lie on her report to do it .
You see , officers were cleared of any wrongdoing in the death of her son .
“ Ms .
Holmes demonstrated enthusiasm to abuse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a red flag affidavit besmirching the name of an honorable CSU police corporal , ” [ Sheriff Justin ] Smith said in a statement to the Coloradoan on Friday .
“ In doing so , she sought to deprive the officer of his constitutional rights.
” Trending : More MAGA Winning : Gallup Poll Has NEVER Recorded This Level Of Economic Optimism Holmes filed the red flag case — known as an extreme risk protection order — against Colorado State University Cpl .
Philip Morris on Jan. 9 .
Morris was one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Holmes ’ 19-year-old son , Jeremy Holmes , on July 1 , 2017 .
The Larimer County district attorney cleared both officers of wrongdoing in the shooting .
In the petition , Holmes claimed under oath she is a family or household member of Morris , specifically that she has a child in common with him .
In a sworn written statement presented by Morris ’ attorney during the red flag hearing , Morris said he did not share a child with Holmes .
Source : Coloradoan She lied under oath in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a grudge against of his constitutional rights .
Isn ’ t this exactly the scenario we ’ ve raised concerns about ?
Brian Stelter Accidentally Gives Powerful Argument AGAINST The Red Flag Laws Red Flag Gun Laws- The Obvious Problems Politicians Want To Ignore Red Flag : An Insidious Way Of Allowing Unconstitutional Gun Control … Without Due Process Red-Flag Gun Laws- Public Safety or Abuse of the Innocent ?

This was an example of precisely the malicious abuse of red flag laws that made 2A proponents object to them in the first place.
A woman whose son was shot dead on an encounter with police attempted to use Colorado’s Red Flag laws to strip one officer of his lawful right to bear arms.
The problem with her complaint was that she had to lie on her report to do it. You see, officers were cleared of any wrongdoing in the death of her son.
“Ms. Holmes demonstrated enthusiasm to abuse the legal system when she fraudulently filed a red flag affidavit besmirching the name of an honorable CSU police corporal,” [Sheriff Justin] Smith said in a statement to the Coloradoan on Friday. “In doing so, she sought to deprive the officer of his constitutional rights.” Holmes filed the red flag case — known as an extreme risk protection order — against Colorado State University Cpl. Philip Morris on Jan. 9. Morris was one of two officers involved in the fatal shooting of Holmes’ 19-year-old son, Jeremy Holmes, on July 1, 2017. The Larimer County district attorney cleared both officers of wrongdoing in the shooting. In the petition, Holmes claimed under oath she is a family or household member of Morris, specifically that she has a child in common with him. In a sworn written statement presented by Morris’ attorney during the red flag hearing, Morris said he did not share a child with Holmes.
Source: Coloradoan
She lied under oath in order to deprive a citizen she had a grudge against of his constitutional rights.
Isn’t this exactly the scenario we’ve raised concerns about?
Related…
Brian Stelter Accidentally Gives Powerful Argument AGAINST The Red Flag Laws
Red Flag Gun Laws- The Obvious Problems Politicians Want To Ignore
Red Flag: An Insidious Way Of Allowing Unconstitutional Gun Control … Without Due Process
Red-Flag Gun Laws- Public Safety or Abuse of the Innocent?


clashdaily--2020-02-07--Husband Claims He Threw $1M Cash In A Bonfire Rather Than Pay His Ex And Kids

This may sound like a crazy 80s movie plot , but it happened right here in our backyard .
One businessman in Canada ’ s capital took extreme action to keep his money from going to his ex in an ( obviously ) acrimonious divorce proceedings .
Less than 2 years ago , he was running to be mayor of Ottawa .
Now , he ’ s facing the wrath of a judge for what he did with all his money .
He was quite a rags-to-riches a success story .
An excerpt of a story about him from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : More MAGA Winning : Gallup Poll Has NEVER Recorded This Level Of Economic Optimism McConville makes clear that he is not a run-of-the-mill garage owner , but a serious entrepreneur .
He started a business in a wooden shack in 1981 , and over the last 37 years built it into a successful 16-bay garage that is one of the largest independent repair shops in the city .
Today , his garage employs 11 full-time workers and five part-timers in the fall .
The garage has 33 loaners for customers and his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He also owns property around town .
Source : OttawaCitizen The divorce court judge took aim at his finances , and he was what you might call ‘ uncooperative ’ .
Bruce McConville , 55 , has long defied a court order to file an affidavit about the state of his finances , meaning authorities are unable to figure out what he owes in child and spousal support .
As a result , McConville hasn ’ t paid anything to his ex-wife .
He is also accused of ignoring a Superior Court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a security , and he has defied a further court order telling him not to sell his properties .
McConville appeared in court at a contempt motion on January 28 , where he told Superior Court Justice Kevin Phillips he sold both properties and businesses before withdrawing a total of $ 1,050,000 CAD ( £583,565 ) in cash through 25 withdrawals from six different bank accounts .
He said he had the ATM receipts to prove he withdrew the cash , but he no longer had the $ 1 million – a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : EC So , where can $ 1 Million dollars disappear to ?
That depends who you believe .
If you buy the husband ’ s explanation , the short answer is this : McConville ’ s explanation that he set fire to the missing million was revealed during a contempt motion last week before Superior Court Justice Kevin Phillips .
McConville told Phillips he withdrew a total of $ 1,050,000 through as many as 25 withdrawals from six bank accounts — and had the receipts to back up his claim — but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You ’ ve lost me .
What do you mean ?
” the judge asked .
McConville rambled and spoke of anxiety about a relationship with a daughter .
“ Can I back you up a bit ?
When you say you destroyed it , what do you mean ?
” the judge asked .
“ To the tune of how much ?
” the judge probed .
“ In total , about a million and thirty-nine thousand dollars , ” McConville said .
( McConville later said he burned $ 1,050,000 in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He didn ’ t film the destruction and has no way of proving it ever happened .
The Judge , therefore , is calling BS on his story , and threw him in the cooler for 30 days , to sort out his story , with threats of much worse to come if he doesn ’ t come clean with the courts .