clashdaily--2020-11-27--Johns Hopkins University Newsletter DELETES Report Examining The Data Of COVID-19 Deaths In The U.S.

Is this about “ The Science ” or about something else ?
A stunning article published in the Johns Hopkins University News-Letter stated that coronavirus deaths appear to have been exaggerated and that the death rate in total in the United States hasn ’ t increased significantly this year .
Genevieve Briand , assistant program director of the Applied Economics master ’ s degree program at Hopkins analyzed the deaths due to COVID-19 and what she found was astounding .
In a presentation , she shared the results of the study .
Surprisingly , the deaths of older people stayed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly , experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups .
However , this increase is not seen from the CDC data .
In fact , the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same… …Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19 , indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged .
Therefore , according to Briand , not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it has also not increased the total number of deaths .
These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people ’ s assumptions , the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming .
In fact , it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States .
That ’ s pretty shocking considering CNN has a running total of COVID-19 cases and deaths on the screen 24/7 .
But hey , it ’ s all about The Science™ and not pushing Pandemic Porn for ratings , right ?
Briand notes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the deaths due to heart disease and other causes with a corresponding number of deaths due to COVID-19 .
She adds that there needs to be significantly more analysis and examination of COVID-19 deaths to get a proper picture .
Genevieve Briand is not a “ medical expert ” she ’ s a number-cruncher looking at the data .
But isn ’ t that a good thing ?
It takes the personal stakes out of it .
There are financial incentives to inflate the COVID-19 numbers A USA Today Fact Check determined that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hospitals for COVID-positive patients on ventilators .
The Johns Hopkins article written by Yanni Gu is now being shoved down the memory hole .
The article is available on the Wayback Machine but we have published it in full below .
Read the whole thing for yourself and make your own decisions on the results .
According to new data , the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases , new cases per day and deaths .
Genevieve Briand , assistant program director of the Applied Economics master ’ s degree program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) in her webinar titled “ COVID-19 Deaths : A Look at U.S. Data.
” From mid-March to mid-September , U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million , of which 200,000 , or 12 % of total deaths , are COVID-19-related .
Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths , Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States .
After retrieving data on the CDC website , Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September , which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared .
Surprisingly , the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19 .
Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly , experts expected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in older age groups .
However , this increase is not seen from the CDC data .
In fact , the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same .
“ The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals , ” Briand said .
Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19 , indicating that this number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emerged .
Therefore , according to Briand , not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people , but it has also not increased the total number of deaths .
These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people ’ s assumptions , the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming .
In fact , it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States .
This comes as a shock to many people .
How is it that the data lie so far @ @ @ @ @ @ @ question , Briand shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020 .
There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19 .
This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the U.S. in early 2020 , and thus COVID-19-related deaths increased drastically afterward .
Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes , with the top three being heart disease , respiratory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is true every year .
Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs , we have an increase of deaths due to all causes , ” Briand pointed out .
When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period , COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases .
This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths .
However , when taking a closer look at the death numbers , she noted something strange .
As Briand compared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that period in 2020 to 2018 , she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes , there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease .
Even more surprising , as seen in the graph below , this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes .
This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years .
Interestingly , as depicted in the table below , the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Briand , that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading .
Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases , respiratory diseases , influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19 .
The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths .
Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths .
This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that COVID-19 created any excess deaths .
Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers .
We found no evidence to the contrary , ” Briand concluded .
In an interview with The News-Letter , Briand addressed the question of whether COVID-19 deaths can be called misleading since the infection might have exacerbated and even led to deaths by other underlying diseases .
“ If [ the COVID-19 death toll ] was not misleading at all , what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn ’ t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification , ” Briand replied .
In other words , the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the U.S. is considered problematic only when it increases the total number of deaths or the true death burden by a significant amount in addition to the expected deaths by other causes .
Since the crude number of total deaths by all causes before and after COVID-19 has stayed the same , one can hardly say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that COVID-19 deaths are concerning .
Briand also mentioned that more research and data are needed to truly decipher the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States .
Throughout the talk , Briand constantly emphasized that although COVID-19 is a serious national and global problem , she also stressed that society should never lose focus of the bigger picture — death in general .
The death of a loved one , from COVID-19 or from other causes , is always tragic , Briand explained .
Each life is equally important and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a global pandemic we should not forget about the tragic loss of lives from other causes .
According to Briand , the over-exaggeration of the COVID-19 death number may be due to the constant emphasis on COVID-19-related deaths and the habitual overlooking of deaths by other natural causes in society .
During an interview with The News-Letter after the event , Poorna Dharmasena , a master ’ s candidate in Applied Economics , expressed his opinion about Briand ’ s concluding remarks .
“ At the end of the day , it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over-exaggeration or not , to a certain degree , is irrelevant , ” Dharmasena said .
When asked whether the public should be informed about this exaggeration in death numbers , Dharmasena stated that people have a right to know the truth .
However , COVID-19 should still continuously be treated as a deadly disease to safeguard the vulnerable population .
The reaction in those who are skeptical of the prevailing COVID-19 narrative was swift… …which resulted in JHU News-Letter removing the article from the website .
They admitted that it was removed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the spread of misinformation about COVID-19.
” This was simply an examination of the data and the numbers .
Apparently , we ’ re no longer allowed to question anything , just obey .
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time .
Don ’ t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here : Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness .
If you ’ re still on Facebook , check out our ClashBriefing page .

Is this about “The Science” or about something else?
***UPDATE: The video with the presentation slides and audio is included below.****
A stunning article published in the Johns Hopkins University News-Letter stated that coronavirus deaths appear to have been exaggerated and that the death rate in total in the United States hasn’t increased significantly this year.
Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins analyzed the deaths due to COVID-19 and what she found was astounding. In a presentation, she shared the results of the study.
From the article:
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same… …Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths. These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.
That’s pretty shocking considering CNN has a running total of COVID-19 cases and deaths on the screen 24/7.
But hey, it’s all about The Science™ and not pushing Pandemic Porn for ratings, right?
Briand notes that there was an apparent reduction in the deaths due to heart disease and other causes with a corresponding number of deaths due to COVID-19. She adds that there needs to be significantly more analysis and examination of COVID-19 deaths to get a proper picture.
“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded… …According to Briand, the over-exaggeration of the COVID-19 death number may be due to the constant emphasis on COVID-19-related deaths and the habitual overlooking of deaths by other natural causes in society.
Genevieve Briand is not a “medical expert” she’s a number-cruncher looking at the data. But isn’t that a good thing? It takes the personal stakes out of it.
There are financial incentives to inflate the COVID-19 numbers A USA Today Fact Check determined that Medicare was indeed paying more money to hospitals for COVID-positive patients on ventilators.
The Johns Hopkins article written by Yanni Gu is now being shoved down the memory hole.
Fortunately, the internet is forever.
The article is available on the Wayback Machine but we have published it in full below.
Read the whole thing for yourself and make your own decisions on the results.
Here is the video of the presentation with the slides and audio:
**********BEGINNING OF ARTICLE**********
According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”
From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.
She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States.
After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.
“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.
Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths.
These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.
This comes as a shock to many people. How is it that the data lie so far from our perception?
To answer that question, Briand shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020. There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19. This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the U.S. in early 2020, and thus COVID-19-related deaths increased drastically afterward.
Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes, with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.
“This is true every year. Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes,” Briand pointed out.
When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.
COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIANDGraph depicts the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018.
This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19.
COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIANDGraph depicts the total decrease in deaths by various causes, including COVID-19.
The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease.
“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded.
In an interview with The News-Letter, Briand addressed the question of whether COVID-19 deaths can be called misleading since the infection might have exacerbated and even led to deaths by other underlying diseases.
“If [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,” Briand replied.
In other words, the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the U.S. is considered problematic only when it increases the total number of deaths or the true death burden by a significant amount in addition to the expected deaths by other causes. Since the crude number of total deaths by all causes before and after COVID-19 has stayed the same, one can hardly say, in Briand’s view, that COVID-19 deaths are concerning.
Briand also mentioned that more research and data are needed to truly decipher the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States.
Throughout the talk, Briand constantly emphasized that although COVID-19 is a serious national and global problem, she also stressed that society should never lose focus of the bigger picture — death in general.
The death of a loved one, from COVID-19 or from other causes, is always tragic, Briand explained. Each life is equally important and we should be reminded that even during a global pandemic we should not forget about the tragic loss of lives from other causes.
According to Briand, the over-exaggeration of the COVID-19 death number may be due to the constant emphasis on COVID-19-related deaths and the habitual overlooking of deaths by other natural causes in society.
During an interview with The News-Letter after the event, Poorna Dharmasena, a master’s candidate in Applied Economics, expressed his opinion about Briand’s concluding remarks.
“At the end of the day, it’s still a deadly virus. And over-exaggeration or not, to a certain degree, is irrelevant,” Dharmasena said.
When asked whether the public should be informed about this exaggeration in death numbers, Dharmasena stated that people have a right to know the truth. However, COVID-19 should still continuously be treated as a deadly disease to safeguard the vulnerable population.
**********END OF ARTICLE**********
The reaction in those who are skeptical of the prevailing COVID-19 narrative was swift…
“These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”
–The Johns Hopkins News Letter 11/26/20https://t.co/57izcxgDfe#coronavirus — Larry Elder (@larryelder) November 26, 2020
“The total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading.” ? https://t.co/lz6pWk4mDA pic.twitter.com/ckRtNy1JrL — SecondOpinion (@DaFeid) November 26, 2020
Dear friends, you are in for a shock so prepare yourselves. I’ve been looking at data all year but nothing prepares me for this: “The total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19.” https://t.co/myGtjms6XO — Jeffrey A Tucker (@jeffreyatucker) November 26, 2020
…which resulted in JHU News-Letter removing the article from the website. They admitted that it was removed because it “may have contributed to the spread of misinformation about COVID-19.”
Though making clear the need for further research, the article was being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies about the impact of the pandemic. We regret that this article may have contributed to the spread of misinformation about COVID-19. — JHU News-Letter (@JHUNewsLetter) November 26, 2020
This was simply an examination of the data and the numbers.
Apparently, we’re no longer allowed to question anything, just obey.
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Become a Clash Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness.
If you’re still on Facebook, check out our ClashBriefing page.
Stay Rowdy!


clashdaily--2020-11-27--SO DIRTY: Proof That Partisan Press Impacted Democrat Voters’ Choices… Bigly!

One-in-six Biden voters would NEVER have supported him had they know about any of these several news stories — flipping the results red in several battleground states .
And for anyone who seriously thinks this was not intentional on the part of the Media ( D ) , we ’ ve got a bridge to sell ya .
NewsBusters followed up with more than 1000 Biden voters in battleground states , and what they ’ ve learned was exactly the reason we have been blasting the defacto AV department of the Democrat party as ‘ fake news ’ for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden voters were largely ignorant of some key news that would be favorable to Trump as well as news that would be harmful to Biden .
The full article can be found here , but here is a summary of some key takeaways .
More than one-third of Biden voters didn ’ t know about the allegations by Tara Reade that Joe Biden ’ s hand had violated his ( lifelong Democrat ! )
female staffer body against her will , with 8.9 % saying they would have voted differently had they known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enough to shift six battleground states from Biden ’ s column to Trump ’ s , giving him 311 Electoral College votes . )
How about that Hunter Biden story ?
Turns out 45.1 % of Biden voters were kept in the dark about that one .
( Thanks to a coordinated effort from traditional media and social media throwing a cone of silence over it .
That would have impacted the choice of 9.4 % of Dem voters , likewise flipping 6 states , giving Trump 311 Electoral College votes . )
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ hadn ’ t a sweet clue about Kamala ’ s voting record being further left than even Bernie Sanders .
That would be a 4.1 % difference and 5 states .
Trump up with 295 . )
That ’ s only half of the story .
The other half was the good news they were never told .
Pre-election jobs reports .
Democrats were in the dark that jobs were well on their way to bouncing back from the shutdowns , with 11 Million jobs coming back from June to October .
39.4 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s a 5.4 % changed vote , for 295 Electoral College votes .
Economic growth , Trump ’ s signature promise .
Like jobs , rebounding nicely after the obligatory shutdown .
Record jump in growth all but unreported , 49.0 % in the dark , 5.6 % shift .
Trump 295 .
Multiple Middle East Peace Agreements / 3 Nobel Peace Prize nominations ( Actually , there is now a 5th nomination ) : 43.5 % of Biden voters had no idea about any of it .
5 % of voters would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 5 states , giving Trump 295 .
Energy Independence ?
Same story .
50.5 % of Biden voters did not know America had achieved the long-sought-after goal of energy independence , and 5.8 would have changed their mind about Biden/Trump over this issue .
Trump 295 .
Facebook , Twitter and the media have been blowing smoke about ‘ propaganda ’ for a very long time , claiming that the Right has been dishonest and required censorship .
Rush Limbaugh , on the other hand , has long called Democrat voters ‘ low-information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Framers understood that a free people must necessarily be an informed people .
If the media keeps voters in the dark with the explicit intent of pushing their will on the public ’ s voting , it ’ s time to ask about their motives for manipulating what the public knows .
If their reason is that they want to blind citizens to the facts to manipulate citizens into supporting the media ’ s personal political agenda , they are not respecting the free people to behave as truly free people .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrong with the criticism that the press is the ‘ enemy of the people ’ ?
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time .
Don ’ t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here : Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness .
If you ’ re still on Facebook , check out our ClashBriefing page .

One-in-six Biden voters would NEVER have supported him had they know about any of these several news stories — flipping the results red in several battleground states.
And for anyone who seriously thinks this was not intentional on the part of the Media(D), we’ve got a bridge to sell ya.
NewsBusters followed up with more than 1000 Biden voters in battleground states, and what they’ve learned was exactly the reason we have been blasting the defacto AV department of the Democrat party as ‘fake news’ for the past 4 years.
They discovered that Biden voters were largely ignorant of some key news that would be favorable to Trump as well as news that would be harmful to Biden.
This lack of information proved crucial: One of every six Biden voters we surveyed (17%) said they would have abandoned the Democratic candidate had they known the facts about one or more of these news stories. A shift of this magnitude would have changed the outcome in all six of the swing states won by Joe Biden, and Donald Trump would have comfortably won a second term as president.-NewsBusters
The full article can be found here, but here is a summary of some key takeaways.
The Biden bad news:
More than one-third of Biden voters didn’t know about the allegations by Tara Reade that Joe Biden’s hand had violated his (lifelong Democrat!) female staffer body against her will, with 8.9% saying they would have voted differently had they known. (This alone would have been enough to shift six battleground states from Biden’s column to Trump’s, giving him 311 Electoral College votes.)
How about that Hunter Biden story? Turns out 45.1% of Biden voters were kept in the dark about that one. (Thanks to a coordinated effort from traditional media and social media throwing a cone of silence over it. That would have impacted the choice of 9.4% of Dem voters, likewise flipping 6 states, giving Trump 311 Electoral College votes.)
Hard Left politics. Most Democrat voters hadn’t a sweet clue about Kamala’s voting record being further left than even Bernie Sanders. That would be a 4.1% difference and 5 states. Trump up with 295.)
That’s only half of the story. The other half was the good news they were never told.
The Trump good news:
Pre-election jobs reports. Democrats were in the dark that jobs were well on their way to bouncing back from the shutdowns, with 11 Million jobs coming back from June to October. 39.4% in the dark. That’s a 5.4% changed vote, for 295 Electoral College votes.
Economic growth, Trump’s signature promise. Like jobs, rebounding nicely after the obligatory shutdown. Record jump in growth all but unreported, 49.0% in the dark, 5.6% shift. Trump 295.
Multiple Middle East Peace Agreements / 3 Nobel Peace Prize nominations (Actually, there is now a 5th nomination): 43.5% of Biden voters had no idea about any of it. 5% of voters would have changed over this question, flipping 5 states, giving Trump 295.
Energy Independence? Same story. 50.5% of Biden voters did not know America had achieved the long-sought-after goal of energy independence, and 5.8 would have changed their mind about Biden/Trump over this issue. Trump 295.
See a pattern forming here?
Facebook, Twitter and the media have been blowing smoke about ‘propaganda’ for a very long time, claiming that the Right has been dishonest and required censorship.
Rush Limbaugh, on the other hand, has long called Democrat voters ‘low-information’ voters.
The Founding Fathers and the Framers understood that a free people must necessarily be an informed people.
If the media keeps voters in the dark with the explicit intent of pushing their will on the public’s voting, it’s time to ask about their motives for manipulating what the public knows.
If their reason is that they want to blind citizens to the facts to manipulate citizens into supporting the media’s personal political agenda, they are not respecting the free people to behave as truly free people.
In that case, what would be wrong with the criticism that the press is the ‘enemy of the people’?
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Become a Clash Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness.
If you’re still on Facebook, check out our ClashBriefing page.
Stay Rowdy!


clashdaily--2020-11-27--Quid Pro Joe Picks China Booster For National Security Advisor … Is That News?

Hey Biden , is this a payoff for all those lucrative business deals your family had with its Chinese Communist connections ?
Are you representing American interests or your own ?
There is a reason we were calling Joe Biden a security risk .
No serious investigative attention had been given to significant evidence indicating Chinese influence attempts to Joe and Hunter Biden involving millions of dollars .
And now , it might be too late .
For all the media hand-wringing about Trump being a ‘ Manchurian Candidate ’ based on debunked allegations of Russian Collusion , Biden ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dollars from their relationships with Chinese and Russian billionaires .
We ’ ve raised a few concerns about Biden ’ s National Security advisor pick already , here : NATIONAL SECURITY : Biden ’ s Pick For Advisor Has Some Strange Views About Al Qaeda But now we know Jake Sullivan ’ s take on China is every bit as bad as his other takes : “ We need to strike a middle course – one that encourages China ’ s rise in a manner consistent with an open , fair , rules-based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ This will require care and prudence and strategic foresight , and maybe even more basically it will require sustained attention .
It may not have escaped your notice that these are not in ample supply in Washington right now.
” Sullivan added that U.S. policy on China , which has been under communist control for more than 70 years , needed to be about more than bilateral relations and it “ needs to be about our ties to the region that create an environment more conducive to a peaceful and positive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the world is starting to wake up to the fact that China is a threat to international stability… And Joe is picking people who want a STRONGER China for the role of national security advisor ?
What could POSSIBLY go wrong ?
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time .
Don ’ t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here : Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness .
If you ’ re still on Facebook , check out @ @ @ @

Hey Biden, is this a payoff for all those lucrative business deals your family had with its Chinese Communist connections? Are you representing American interests or your own?
There is a reason we were calling Joe Biden a security risk.
No serious investigative attention had been given to significant evidence indicating Chinese influence attempts to Joe and Hunter Biden involving millions of dollars.
And now, it might be too late.
For all the media hand-wringing about Trump being a ‘Manchurian Candidate’ based on debunked allegations of Russian Collusion, Biden’s immediate family actually received millions of dollars from their relationships with Chinese and Russian billionaires.
We’ve raised a few concerns about Biden’s National Security advisor pick already, here:
NATIONAL SECURITY: Biden’s Pick For Advisor Has Some Strange Views About Al Qaeda
But now we know Jake Sullivan’s take on China is every bit as bad as his other takes:
“We need to strike a middle course – one that encourages China’s rise in a manner consistent with an open, fair, rules-based, regional order,” Sullivan said. “This will require care and prudence and strategic foresight, and maybe even more basically it will require sustained attention. It may not have escaped your notice that these are not in ample supply in Washington right now.” Sullivan added that U.S. policy on China, which has been under communist control for more than 70 years, needed to be about more than bilateral relations and it “needs to be about our ties to the region that create an environment more conducive to a peaceful and positive sum Chinese rise.” –DailyWire
The rest of the world is starting to wake up to the fact that China is a threat to international stability…
And Joe is picking people who want a STRONGER China for the role of national security advisor?
What could POSSIBLY go wrong?
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Become a Clash Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness.
If you’re still on Facebook, check out our ClashBriefing page.
Stay Rowdy!


clashdaily--2020-11-27--ELECTION CORRUPTION: Hearing Room Gasps When Rudy Presents This Damning Evidence

Who eventually becomes POTUS in January is only part of the story here .
Americans have a right to know if the result itself can be trusted .
That ’ s what audits and hearings are for .
Regardless who you think the real rightful winner of the General Election might be , public confidence in that election result requires a widespread belief that the results that have been made public really does reflect the actual will of the people .
That ’ s where audits and court challenges have their proper place .
Any dirty dealing , any lawful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all play a part in shedding doubt on the election result .
If we truly are going to have a ‘ less divided ’ America , we need some measure of confidence that those results are valid .
This is why the full-court press of the media to rush ahead to Joe ’ s coronation is not serving the national interest .
Letting the process play out in the cool light of day was deliberately built into the system for precisely this sort of a contested situation .
No , that wasn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ given was just as damning as this .
Here ’ s a thread : If there is evidence like this , that takes us beyond the realm of the improbable and into the realm of the impossible , the public deserves to have those questions answered before we proceed to the next step .
After all , elections are the civil and peaceful alternative to an armed revolt by a public whose voices are not heard in the halls of power .
Any nation or group that would destabilize that process does so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is clamping down on conservative media big time .
Don ’ t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here : Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness .
If you ’ re still on Facebook , check out our ClashBriefing page .

Who eventually becomes POTUS in January is only part of the story here. Americans have a right to know if the result itself can be trusted. That’s what audits and hearings are for.
Regardless who you think the real rightful winner of the General Election might be, public confidence in that election result requires a widespread belief that the results that have been made public really does reflect the actual will of the people.
That’s where audits and court challenges have their proper place. Any dirty dealing, any lawful votes suppress, or invalid votes counted all play a part in shedding doubt on the election result.
If we truly are going to have a ‘less divided’ America, we need some measure of confidence that those results are valid. This is why the full-court press of the media to rush ahead to Joe’s coronation is not serving the national interest.
Letting the process play out in the cool light of day was deliberately built into the system for precisely this sort of a contested situation.
.@RudyGiuliani: Of the 600K votes added during curious "spikes" in PA, how many went to Biden? Witness: "I think our figures were about 570-some-odd-thousand." "And how much for Trump? Witness: "I think it was a little over 3,200." *crowd erupts in gasps, laughter* pic.twitter.com/jV3BOI3qY2 — The First (@TheFirstonTV) November 25, 2020
No, that wasn’t all, either. Other testimony given was just as damning as this. Here’s a thread:
PENNSYLVANIA? "In all cases the chain of custody was broken." "It was broken for the mail in ballots, the drop box ballots, the election day USB card flash drives, in all cases they didn't follow any of the procedures defined by the Board of Delaware County of Elections." pic.twitter.com/v9mP8QRqnL — Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) November 25, 2020
PENNSYLVANIA? "I observed in the locked room in the back office 70k unopened mail in ballots. The problem was by that time the mail in ballots had already been counted. So 120k mail in counted, posted, done. My question is, where did the 70k ballots go? And nobody knows."? pic.twitter.com/UxPJR2ITYA — Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) November 25, 2020
PENNSYLVANIA? "People ask me all the time, 'how do people commit crimes'? I always look for the simplest things –people sticking USBs in, putting ballots in, very simple things– only takes a couple of people. Doesn't take a big conspiracy."? pic.twitter.com/gLGlit2iXT — Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) November 25, 2020
PENNSYLVANIA? "People ask me all the time, 'how do people commit crimes'? I always look for the simplest things –people sticking USBs in, putting ballots in, very simple things– only takes a couple of people. Doesn't take a big conspiracy."? pic.twitter.com/gLGlit2iXT — Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) November 25, 2020
PENNSYLVANIA? "So we have 100k-120k ballots in question. If the democrats had followed there own procedures which they created they could exonerate themselves. But they can't do that. So if you can't certify 100k out of 300k votes — then you can't certify Delaware county."? pic.twitter.com/Ht89Lm8Efz — Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) November 25, 2020
If there is evidence like this, that takes us beyond the realm of the improbable and into the realm of the impossible, the public deserves to have those questions answered before we proceed to the next step.
After all, elections are the civil and peaceful alternative to an armed revolt by a public whose voices are not heard in the halls of power.
Any nation or group that would destabilize that process does so at their own risk.
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Become a Clash Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness.
If you’re still on Facebook, check out our ClashBriefing page.
Stay Rowdy!


clashdaily--2020-11-27--Chris Evans Took YEARS Building A ‘Bipartisan’ Political Website — Now He’s Calling For A List Of Tr

Chris Evans Took YEARS Building A ‘Bipartisan’ Political Website — Now He’s Calling For A List Of Trump ‘Enablers’

I think we ’ ve found Hollywood ’ s Worst Chris and it ’ s not even close .
Remember how there was this thing going around on Twitter about “ Hollywood ’ s Worst Chris ” and Chris Pratt was selected by leftists as the “ winner ” of that distinction ?
It ’ s because they had their panties in a bunch because Pratt is openly Christian , pro-America , pro-hunting , and the horror of horrors , he didn ’ t attend a Biden fundraiser featuring Kamala Harris .
It ’ s pretty clear , though that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chris .
The man that played Captain America , though… eh , not so much .
I really want to like Chris Evans and then he does things that remind me that he ’ s just another stupid , ideological leftist albeit much better looking than most .
He does things that I really want to applaud .
In July , Evans launched a “ bipartisan ” website to help inform voters called “ A Starting Point.
” It took him two years to build it because lawmakers didn ’ t think that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s honestly a really good idea .
It gets lawmakers to weigh in on issues directly .
There is a Point/Counterpoint section with discussions between Republican and Democrat politicians , 2-minute answers by lawmakers on relevant issues such as : He posted a video about the website on his Instagram account .
Chris was so proud of his accomplishment .
He ’ s talked about it on Jimmy Kimmel ’ s show .
In short — he did a good thing .
I think it ’ s important to know both sides @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an ideological bubble .
Chances are Evans , devout leftist that he is , thought that the 60+ million people that voted for Trump in 2016 were “ low information voters ” and he wanted to “ help ” with that .
Unfortunately , that ’ s not the case .
Rightwingers are more informed on the issues .
It was true in 2012 and confirmed in 2016 .
It seems that the Partisan Press and Big Tech kept voters uninformed in 2020 which may have shifted the results of the election .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ now Evans is ( rather obliquely ) calling for an “ Enemies List.
” I ’ m so disappointed right now .
The tweet is rather vague , but it is likely a reference to the Trump supporters that are backing recounts and legal challenges and urging the President not to concede , or perhaps it ’ s those that supported the President ’ s agenda .
Who knows ?
It ’ s not very clear .
After years of working on a “ bipartisan ” website to inform voters , he still @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and “ they ” need to be held accountable for what… disagreeing ?
What the heck is the point of the website , then ?
This is the man that donned the uniform of the great Marvel superhero , Captain America .
As an actor , you ’ d think that perhaps playing the role so many times and examining who Cap was created to be would ’ ve given him a bit of perspective — but no .
I ’ m apparently not the only one who saw the deep disconnect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ role .
“ Remember who said nothing ?
” What is this ?
Is Evans trying to indicate that Trump advocates are enemies of the state ?
Is he encouraging big brother government , where machines daily spy on people who have been labeled as “ dangerous ” to monitor their every action ?
Didn ’ t Evans condemn stuff like that as his titular role in Captain America : The Winter Soldier ?
He ’ s starting to make Trump adherents sound like bystanders to a crime .
Who else is wondering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just another resentful anti-Trumper who feels the need to voice his indignation .
Consequently , he ’ s egging on an already volatile leftist base to engage in behavior that threatens the safety of right-wingers .
He should take a lesson from his most notable film role .
Or a lesson from Hollywood history .
Who could forget the infamous Hollywood Blacklist in the years after World War II ?
How long until people are demanded to answer , “ Are you now , or have you ever been , a supporter of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I ’ m pretty confident that if the roles were reversed and Biden was the one challenging the results of the election , Evans would be tweeting something completely different — probably about Russian election meddling or some other exaggerated leftwing conspiracy theory .
I have been a fan of Captain America since I was a child .
I had a somewhat dorky childhood in a small town in Canada .
One of the things I loved to do was reading my older brother ’ s comic books , and Captain America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cap stood for the best things in America — strength , liberty , resilience , faithfulness , and doing what is right , even if it means it ’ s America against the world .
He was the epitome of American Exceptionalism .
Chris Evans is clearly no Captain America .
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time .
Don ’ t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here : Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness .
If you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out our ClashBriefing page .

I think we’ve found Hollywood’s Worst Chris and it’s not even close.
Remember how there was this thing going around on Twitter about “Hollywood’s Worst Chris” and Chris Pratt was selected by leftists as the “winner” of that distinction? It’s because they had their panties in a bunch because Pratt is openly Christian, pro-America, pro-hunting, and the horror of horrors, he didn’t attend a Biden fundraiser featuring Kamala Harris. It’s pretty clear, though that Chris Pratt is the very Best Hollywood Chris.
The man that played Captain America, though… eh, not so much.
I really want to like Chris Evans and then he does things that remind me that he’s just another stupid, ideological leftist albeit much better looking than most.
He does things that I really want to applaud.
Like this…
In July, Evans launched a “bipartisan” website to help inform voters called “A Starting Point.” It took him two years to build it because lawmakers didn’t think that he was serious at first.
It’s honestly a really good idea. It gets lawmakers to weigh in on issues directly. There is a Point/Counterpoint section with discussions between Republican and Democrat politicians, 2-minute answers by lawmakers on relevant issues such as:
the Economy
Education
Rights
Immigration
Government
He posted a video about the website on his Instagram account.
Chris was so proud of his accomplishment.
Today’s the day!!!! After two years of work I’m SO excited to finally launch ASP! ??
Our panel w @FastCompany goes up in a couple hours. Hopefully we answer any questions you might have! @MarkKassen @JoeKiani @MiaCharity @ASP #AStartingPoint pic.twitter.com/NFnPFC5UgI — Chris Evans (@ChrisEvans) July 14, 2020
He’s talked about it on Jimmy Kimmel’s show.
In short — he did a good thing. I think it’s important to know both sides of an issue and not live in an ideological bubble.
Chances are Evans, devout leftist that he is, thought that the 60+ million people that voted for Trump in 2016 were “low information voters” and he wanted to “help” with that. Unfortunately, that’s not the case. Rightwingers are more informed on the issues. It was true in 2012 and confirmed in 2016. It seems that the Partisan Press and Big Tech kept voters uninformed in 2020 which may have shifted the results of the election.
Fast forward to November 2020, and now Evans is (rather obliquely) calling for an “Enemies List.”
Actors Zach Braff and Chris Evans publicized their determination on Twitter to “remember” the supporters of President Donald Trump, since apparently they are to blame for his actions… …Chris Evans, who is famous for his portrayal of Captain America in Marvel Cinematic Universe films, tweeted similar sentiments on November 19: “#RememberWhoSaidNothing”
I’m so disappointed right now.
The tweet is rather vague, but it is likely a reference to the Trump supporters that are backing recounts and legal challenges and urging the President not to concede, or perhaps it’s those that supported the President’s agenda. Who knows? It’s not very clear.
After years of working on a “bipartisan” website to inform voters, he still sees “us” vs “them” and “they” need to be held accountable for what… disagreeing? What the heck is the point of the website, then?
This is the man that donned the uniform of the great Marvel superhero, Captain America. As an actor, you’d think that perhaps playing the role so many times and examining who Cap was created to be would’ve given him a bit of perspective — but no.
I’m apparently not the only one who saw the deep disconnect between the actor and his most famous role.
“Remember who said nothing?” What is this? Is Evans trying to indicate that Trump advocates are enemies of the state? Is he encouraging big brother government, where machines daily spy on people who have been labeled as “dangerous” to monitor their every action? Didn’t Evans condemn stuff like that as his titular role in Captain America: The Winter Soldier? He’s starting to make Trump adherents sound like bystanders to a crime. Who else is wondering if that was intended? Evans is just another resentful anti-Trumper who feels the need to voice his indignation. Consequently, he’s egging on an already volatile leftist base to engage in behavior that threatens the safety of right-wingers. He should take a lesson from his most notable film role. Or a lesson from Hollywood history. Who could forget the infamous Hollywood Blacklist in the years after World War II? How long until people are demanded to answer, “Are you now, or have you ever been, a supporter of President Donald J. Trump?” SOurce: Newsbusters
Now, I’m pretty confident that if the roles were reversed and Biden was the one challenging the results of the election, Evans would be tweeting something completely different — probably about Russian election meddling or some other exaggerated leftwing conspiracy theory.
I have been a fan of Captain America since I was a child. I had a somewhat dorky childhood in a small town in Canada. One of the things I loved to do was reading my older brother’s comic books, and Captain America was actually one of my favorites.
Cap stood for the best things in America — strength, liberty, resilience, faithfulness, and doing what is right, even if it means it’s America against the world. He was the epitome of American Exceptionalism.
Chris Evans is clearly no Captain America.
Hollywood’s. Worst. Chris.
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Become a Clash Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness.
If you’re still on Facebook, check out our ClashBriefing page.
Stay Rowdy!


clashdaily--2020-11-27--Hey Mattis: Why Didn’t You Mention Your China Connection While Denouncing America First?

Was Mattis ’ criticism of President Trump coming from his deep patriotism ?
Or was he upset that Trump was hurting the DC gravy train ?
As ClashDaily reported in a recent story where Pompeo pushed back at Mattis for being ‘ dead wrong ’ on the op-ed he co-wrote , criticizing the America First policy as being , ultimately , ‘ America Alone ’ — while supplying chapter and verse to back that up .
See : WATCH : Mattis Slammed ‘ America First ’ … But Then Pompeo Pushed Back But there ’ s something else fishy about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the press .
How is it he didn ’ t mention his lobbyist connections ?
In an online column denouncing President Trump ’ s “ America First ” policy that includes measures regarding Beijing , ex-Defense Secretary James Mattis did not disclose his affiliation with an organization that fosters international business deals with communist China .
As coauthor with three other writers in a Nov. 23 Foreign Affairs column , Mattis did not mention that he works for the [ sic ] The Cohen Group consulting firm .
Nor did he challenge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policies regarding Taiwan , nor the strict economic retaliation Beijing levied against Australia .
His op-ed denounced Trump in terms that made it sound like he was concerned that the President was not working in the American national interest .
But was that his REAL concern ?
Was Mattis GENUINELY concerned about American interests in throwing America First under the bus ?
Or has he sold out to another interest ?
In 2019 , Mattis linked up with the Cohen Group .
Are you familiar with their work ?
Can you guess what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Had he filled in that detail , we might have seen his criticism of Trump in a slightly different light .
“ China is a market of enormous opportunity and complexity , ” the group states on its website , adding that the group ’ s China Practice “ has a solid record of success with professionals in offices in Beijing , Tianjin and Washington , DC.
” The Cohen Group is run by another former Defense Secretary .
William Cohen , who has been involved with China since 1978 , when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leader Deng Xiaoping , according to the organization .
“ Since then , he has been a constant presence in the U.S.-China relationship , including commercial development and security cooperation , ” the organization states , noting that Cohen serves on the Board of Directors of the U.S.-China Business Council .
Mattis joined The Cohen Group in 2019 as a senior counselor .
Former military execs working to build ties with China .
Despite the fact that China is openly hostile to many American interests , including a long history of stealing corporate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American jobs and supply chains .
Supply chains whose vulnerabilities were very much exposed over since everything hit the fan in February of 2020 .
We ’ re not really interested about whether you wore that uniform ‘ once upon a time ’ , Mattis .
We ’ re more interested in where your loyalties lie NOW… Do you care about the citizens of the country you pledged to defend ?
Or have you been corrupted to the point you are willing to throw them to the wolves now that a hostile Communist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your wallet ?
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time .
Don ’ t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here : Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness .
If you ’ re still on Facebook , check out our ClashBriefing page .

Was Mattis’ criticism of President Trump coming from his deep patriotism? Or was he upset that Trump was hurting the DC gravy train?
As ClashDaily reported in a recent story where Pompeo pushed back at Mattis for being ‘dead wrong’ on the op-ed he co-wrote, criticizing the America First policy as being, ultimately, ‘America Alone’ — while supplying chapter and verse to back that up.
See: WATCH: Mattis Slammed ‘America First’… But Then Pompeo Pushed Back
But there’s something else fishy about that op-ed that came to the attention of the press.
How is it he didn’t mention his lobbyist connections?
In an online column denouncing President Trump’s “America First” policy that includes measures regarding Beijing, ex-Defense Secretary James Mattis did not disclose his affiliation with an organization that fosters international business deals with communist China. As coauthor with three other writers in a Nov. 23 Foreign Affairs column, Mattis did not mention that he works for the [sic] The Cohen Group consulting firm. Nor did he challenge China’s tough talk against U.S. policies regarding Taiwan, nor the strict economic retaliation Beijing levied against Australia.
His op-ed denounced Trump in terms that made it sound like he was concerned that the President was not working in the American national interest. But was that his REAL concern?
Was Mattis GENUINELY concerned about American interests in throwing America First under the bus? Or has he sold out to another interest?
In 2019, Mattis linked up with the Cohen Group.
Are you familiar with their work? Can you guess what the Cohen Group’s role is?
Had he filled in that detail, we might have seen his criticism of Trump in a slightly different light.
“China is a market of enormous opportunity and complexity,” the group states on its website, adding that the group’s China Practice “has a solid record of success with professionals in offices in Beijing, Tianjin and Washington, DC.” The Cohen Group is run by another former Defense Secretary. William Cohen, who has been involved with China since 1978, when he went there to meet with Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping, according to the organization. “Since then, he has been a constant presence in the U.S.-China relationship, including commercial development and security cooperation,” the organization states, noting that Cohen serves on the Board of Directors of the U.S.-China Business Council. Mattis joined The Cohen Group in 2019 as a senior counselor.
Former military execs working to build ties with China.
Despite the fact that China is openly hostile to many American interests, including a long history of stealing corporate and military secrets, and siphoning off American jobs and supply chains. Supply chains whose vulnerabilities were very much exposed over since everything hit the fan in February of 2020.
We’re not really interested about whether you wore that uniform ‘once upon a time’, Mattis.
We’re more interested in where your loyalties lie NOW…
Do you care about the citizens of the country you pledged to defend?
Or have you been corrupted to the point you are willing to throw them to the wolves now that a hostile Communist regime is offering a chance to fatten your wallet?
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Become a Clash Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness.
If you’re still on Facebook, check out our ClashBriefing page.
Stay Rowdy!


clashdaily--2020-11-27--RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: Barista, Fired For NOT Wearing Political Message, Sues Starbucks

Let ’ s see if the media who defended the NFL players ’ right to kneel during the anthem while in uniform at a televised game will similarly defend this barista ’ s right to disagree with a corporate message .
With considerable help from a complicit media , the NFL eventually buckled to demands of a few agitator players that they be permitted to kneel during the national anthem as a sign of protest against a country they believed pretty much sucked .
Anyone who agreed with our side of the argument saying political statements should be made on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , rather than a corporate platform you didn ’ t build , and on the company ’ s dime was met with a form-letter answer .
An employee doesn ’ t give up his first amendment .
He ’ s an employee , not a slave .
That misses the point , but it gives us a good reference point for this story about corporate demands to wear a political message that offends one ’ s private beliefs .
Making someone wear a message they disagree with is the same as compelling speech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s far more intrusive than telling employees to act professional and hold getting on a soapbox with your personal opinions until after business hours .
Betsy Fresse , from Newark , who started at the Glen Ridge store in 2019 , claimed she was wrongfully dismissed for refusing to wear an official Starbucks Pride T-shirt .
Ms Fresse , who started at the company in 2015 , was invited to a meeting with her co-workers and manager in June last year where she spotted the box of Pride T-shirts .
In the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey , Ms Fresse allegedly asked her manager if she would be required to wear one but was told she would not .
The barista claimed she was contacted weeks later by the Starbucks ’ ethics and compliance helpline concerning her request to not wear a Pride T-shirt .
She told the representative that she did not want to wear the T-shirt ‘ because her religious beliefs prevented her from doing so ’ , in the lawsuit according to NBC .
Ms Fresse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she had been dismissed because ‘ her comportment was not in compliance with Starbucks ’ core values ’ .
–DailyMail The lawsuit got a green light from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission after lodging an official complaint .
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time .
Don ’ t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here : Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness .
If you ’ re still on Facebook , check out our ClashBriefing page .

Let’s see if the media who defended the NFL players’ right to kneel during the anthem while in uniform at a televised game will similarly defend this barista’s right to disagree with a corporate message.
With considerable help from a complicit media, the NFL eventually buckled to demands of a few agitator players that they be permitted to kneel during the national anthem as a sign of protest against a country they believed pretty much sucked.
Anyone who agreed with our side of the argument saying political statements should be made on your private platform and your own dime, rather than a corporate platform you didn’t build, and on the company’s dime was met with a form-letter answer. An employee doesn’t give up his first amendment. He’s an employee, not a slave.
That misses the point, but it gives us a good reference point for this story about corporate demands to wear a political message that offends one’s private beliefs.
Making someone wear a message they disagree with is the same as compelling speech they don’t believe. That’s far more intrusive than telling employees to act professional and hold getting on a soapbox with your personal opinions until after business hours.
Betsy Fresse, from Newark, who started at the Glen Ridge store in 2019, claimed she was wrongfully dismissed for refusing to wear an official Starbucks Pride T-shirt. Ms Fresse, who started at the company in 2015, was invited to a meeting with her co-workers and manager in June last year where she spotted the box of Pride T-shirts. In the lawsuit, which was filed last week by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, Ms Fresse allegedly asked her manager if she would be required to wear one but was told she would not. The barista claimed she was contacted weeks later by the Starbucks’ ethics and compliance helpline concerning her request to not wear a Pride T-shirt. She told the representative that she did not want to wear the T-shirt ‘because her religious beliefs prevented her from doing so’, in the lawsuit according to NBC. Ms Fresse was notified on August 22 2019 that she had been dismissed because ‘her comportment was not in compliance with Starbucks’ core values’. –DailyMail
The lawsuit got a green light from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission after lodging an official complaint.
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Become a Clash Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness.
If you’re still on Facebook, check out our ClashBriefing page.
Stay Rowdy!


clashdaily--2020-11-27--South Florida Reporter Explains Connection Between 2018 Voting SNAFUs And Today

Florida , ground zero for some serious election controversy in the past , had smooth sailing this year when smaller states did not .
What did they do right ?
For one thing , they changed systems .
For all tut-tutting Trump ’ s court challenges are getting from the chattering class on TV , radio , and in print , one South Florida journalist who ’ s personally dug into the election issues in 2000 and in 2018 has produced a direct link between those elections and this year ’ s SNAFUs .
Have you heard of Sequoia ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Florida , you ’ re about to hear a lot more about it .
Because Sequoia is directly connected to the embarrassingly bad election results two years ago in Palm Beach County ( remember that ? )
as well as the Bush V. Gore nonsense with all those hanging and dimpled chads .
Sequoia voting systems has one heck of an awful elections track record .
You asked if any related voting systems are used in Florida ?
Thankfully not anymore .
Now what company was responsible for the ballots in 2000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chads ?
Sequoia .
And when they released their next generation products , the problems only grew .
By 2004 they were working with a Venezuelan owned company called Smartmatic .
The Sequoia voting systems , programmed by Smartmatic , were first used in the 2004 recall election of Hugo Chavez .
Chavez won that election by 20 % in a vote which was deemed not credible by most outside observers in addition to most Venezuelan voters .
Subsequently government watchdogs began investigating the Sequoia systems and in 2006 the US Committee on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sequoia systems determined the following : The role of the young Venezuelan engineers who founded Smartmatic has become less visible in public documents as the company has been restructured into an elaborate web of offshore companies and foreign trusts .
Additionally , it was found that the systems could be manipulated by users to flip votes from one candidate to another and could be easily hacked .
With worldwide attention on these systems , led by the Bush administration at the time , Smartmatic sold Sequoia in December of 2006 .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dominion .
–BrianMudd The company itself has changed hands , but the core of their system remained largely unchanged .
Sequoia had a sizeable footprint in the United States with the paper ballot systems , a la Florida 2000 .
When they rolled out the electronic systems in 2004 , many local governments across the country simply upgraded to their new electronic version rather than doing their homework on who was behind the systems and how reliable they may or may not be .
By the way , Palm Beach County was one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Sequoia ’ s highly questionable Venezuelan programmed voting systems were deployed across the United States .
So , fast-forward to today .
If a local government implemented the Sequoia voting system around 2004 but hasn ’ t replaced those systems – they ’ re still being used .
In fact , that was still the case in Palm Beach County as recently as the 2018 election debacle .
It was the Sequoia software which was replaced by Wendy Sartory Link as one of her first acts after taking over as PBC ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bucher .
Here ’ s the bottom line .
There aren ’ t many Sequoia systems left across the country – but they exist .
In counties where you ’ ve heard of tabulations which seemingly flipped Trump votes to Biden votes , that ’ s not only possible with compromised Sequoia systems , it ’ s what ’ s believed to have occurred from the beginning in the election of Chavez in 2004 –BrianMudd Florida , with their sketchy history of past election issues , cut ties with the company at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ act of their reforms .
( Ballot harvesting was a separate issue that came up . )
And just like that , they turned it around for this year .
Makes you think that questions about the system at the heart of the same issue elsewhere deserves a fair hearing , don ’ t you think ?
HOPE & BS : More Voter Fraud As 3000 Florida Registrations Show UPS Stores As Residence Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time .
Don ’ t let Big Tech pre-chew your news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here : Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness .
If you ’ re still on Facebook , check out our ClashBriefing page .

Florida, ground zero for some serious election controversy in the past, had smooth sailing this year when smaller states did not. What did they do right? For one thing, they changed systems.
For all tut-tutting Trump’s court challenges are getting from the chattering class on TV, radio, and in print, one South Florida journalist who’s personally dug into the election issues in 2000 and in 2018 has produced a direct link between those elections and this year’s SNAFUs.
Have you heard of Sequoia?
Thanks to Brian Mudd, a reporter from Florida, you’re about to hear a lot more about it.
Because Sequoia is directly connected to the embarrassingly bad election results two years ago in Palm Beach County (remember that?) as well as the Bush V. Gore nonsense with all those hanging and dimpled chads.
Brian explains:
Sequoia voting systems has one heck of an awful elections track record. You asked if any related voting systems are used in Florida? Thankfully not anymore. Now what company was responsible for the ballots in 2000 which created pregnant, hanging and dimpled chads? Sequoia. And when they released their next generation products, the problems only grew. By 2004 they were working with a Venezuelan owned company called Smartmatic. The Sequoia voting systems, programmed by Smartmatic, were first used in the 2004 recall election of Hugo Chavez. Chavez won that election by 20% in a vote which was deemed not credible by most outside observers in addition to most Venezuelan voters. Subsequently government watchdogs began investigating the Sequoia systems and in 2006 the US Committee on Foreign Investment investigation into the Smartmatic programmed Sequoia systems determined the following: The role of the young Venezuelan engineers who founded Smartmatic has become less visible in public documents as the company has been restructured into an elaborate web of offshore companies and foreign trusts. Additionally, it was found that the systems could be manipulated by users to flip votes from one candidate to another and could be easily hacked. With worldwide attention on these systems, led by the Bush administration at the time, Smartmatic sold Sequoia in December of 2006. This is the root of the Venezuelan conspiracy involving Dominion. –BrianMudd
The company itself has changed hands, but the core of their system remained largely unchanged.
Sequoia had a sizeable footprint in the United States with the paper ballot systems, a la Florida 2000. When they rolled out the electronic systems in 2004, many local governments across the country simply upgraded to their new electronic version rather than doing their homework on who was behind the systems and how reliable they may or may not be. By the way, Palm Beach County was one of those governments. As a result, Sequoia’s highly questionable Venezuelan programmed voting systems were deployed across the United States. So, fast-forward to today. If a local government implemented the Sequoia voting system around 2004 but hasn’t replaced those systems – they’re still being used. In fact, that was still the case in Palm Beach County as recently as the 2018 election debacle. It was the Sequoia software which was replaced by Wendy Sartory Link as one of her first acts after taking over as PBC’s election’s supervisor from Susan Bucher. Here’s the bottom line. There aren’t many Sequoia systems left across the country – but they exist. In counties where you’ve heard of tabulations which seemingly flipped Trump votes to Biden votes, that’s not only possible with compromised Sequoia systems, it’s what’s believed to have occurred from the beginning in the election of Chavez in 2004 –BrianMudd
Florida, with their sketchy history of past election issues, cut ties with the company at the heart of their controversies as the first act of their reforms. (Ballot harvesting was a separate issue that came up.)
And just like that, they turned it around for this year.
Makes you think that questions about the system at the heart of the same issue elsewhere deserves a fair hearing, don’t you think?
Related:
FLORIDA VOTER FRAUD: Now Palm Beach Dems Want Non-Citizens’ Votes Counted
HOPE & BS: More Voter Fraud As 3000 Florida Registrations Show UPS Stores As Residence
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Become a Clash Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness.
If you’re still on Facebook, check out our ClashBriefing page.
Stay Rowdy!


clashdaily--2020-11-28--Pennsylvania Judge Rules To Halt Certification, Says Widespread Mail-In Voting Likely Violated State

Pennsylvania Judge Rules To Halt Certification, Says Widespread Mail-In Voting Likely Violated State Constitution

This is a massive win for anyone who is concerned about the integrity of elections .
Which seems to be limited to Republicans these days .
Pennsylvania state Judge Patricia McCollough has issued an injunction to prevent the state from taking any further steps in certifying the election results including “ appointment of electors and transmission of necessary paperwork to the Electoral College ” until further court hearings and rulings are complete .
The case before Judge McCollough was one that hasn ’ t received much attention because it doesn ’ t allege election fraud but was focused on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Pennsylvania .
The lawsuit was filed by several plaintiffs including U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly ( R ) and Sean Parnell , a GOP congressional candidate who lost his race after the bizarre halt in counting that occurred on election night .
You might remember Parnell from our ClashDaily report on the vandalism of his home just days before the election .
Hey Leftists : If The RIGHT Are The Threat To Democracy , Please Explain THIS … Parnell has not conceded his race and is fighting the questionable practices in Pennsylvania just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rather ballsy move , the lawsuit takes aim at the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania , the entire Pennsylvania General Assembly , Governor Tom Wolf , and Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania , Kathy Boockvar .
Gregory H. Teufel , an attorney for the plaintiffs , maintained that the complaint seeks to uphold elections in compliance with the state Constitution .
The effort attempts not to block the certification of “ proper mail-in absentee ballots , ” but to prevent certification of results that would include mail-votes out of line with constitutional requirements , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ limits the extent of allowable mail-in voting and requires in-person voting ” apart from specific and limited circumstances , Mr. Teufel said .
The state received some 266,200 civilian mail-in and absentee ballots for the general election in 2016 , the last presidential election year before Act 77 took effect .
The lawsuit was a simple and powerful one — Act 77 , the bill that was signed into law in 2019 by Governor Wolf to allow “ no-excuse ” mail-in voting was itself a violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution .
It states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face because , in the state of Pennsylvania , changes to voting require a constitutional amendment .
• Pursuant to Article XI , Section 1 , a proposed constitutional amendment must be approved by a majority vote of the members of both the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate in two consecutive legislative sessions ; • the proposed amendment must be published for three months ahead of the next general election in two newspapers in each county ; • it must be submitted to the qualified electors as a ballot question in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ majority of those voting on the amendment .
Act 77 bypassed all of those steps and was just voted on in the legislature .
This lawsuit is rather significant because it could make all of the “ no-excuse ” mail-in ballots illegitimate , and would force the General Assembly to establish next steps including how to determine the election results for all of the November 3 races in the state .
Democrats are saying that this will disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters , Republicans say that Act 77 was passed unconstitutionally .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pennsylvania ’ s expansion of mail-in voting .
This just shows that Democrats in Pennsylvania just like Democrats in Congress don ’ t think much about the Constitution — state or federal — and just impose their will hoping that the courts will vindicate their actions .
Well , not so fast , PA Dems… The Judge found , among other things , that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail on their PA constitutional claims , and that the matter was not moot even though PA had “ certified ” the results , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken [ emphasis added ] : Accordingly , in careful consideration [ on November 25 ] of the exigencies and time constraints in this matter of statewide and national import , and the longstanding constitutional mandate that every citizen of this Commonwealth is entitled to no less than a fair and free election , it was necessary [ on November 25 ] to preliminarily enjoin , on an emergency and temporary basis , Executive Respondents from undertaking any other actions with respect to the certification of the results of the presidential and vice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ needs to be done , pending an evidentiary hearing to ascertain the facts of this matter and to determine if the dispute is moot… .
Based upon the record before it , this Court has sufficient grounds to enjoin Respondents from further certification activities on an emergency preliminary basis , pending the results of the evidentiary hearing it had scheduled for this date , after which the Court would have determined if a preliminary injunction should issue.4 Since the Court is sitting in equity it has the power to fashion such relief as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quo be preserved pending further judicial scrutiny… .
Additionally , Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment .
Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const .
Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77 .
Since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties , this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim .
You can read the full decision here .
Legal Insurrection also notes that the judge is unclear on if the ruling does go in the way of the plaintiffs , it may not actually change the results , but it does mean that it could be headed to a much higher court .
Don ’ t like what ’ s been happening with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a way Big Media can ’ t suppress : Don ’ t wait , get yours now !
To get the shirt , click here .
To get the mug , click here .

This is a massive win for anyone who is concerned about the integrity of elections.
Which seems to be limited to Republicans these days.
Pennsylvania state Judge Patricia McCollough has issued an injunction to prevent the state from taking any further steps in certifying the election results including “appointment of electors and transmission of necessary paperwork to the Electoral College” until further court hearings and rulings are complete.
The case before Judge McCollough was one that hasn’t received much attention because it doesn’t allege election fraud but was focused on the constitutionality of the change in mail-in voting in Pennsylvania.
The lawsuit was filed by several plaintiffs including U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly (R) and Sean Parnell, a GOP congressional candidate who lost his race after the bizarre halt in counting that occurred on election night. You might remember Parnell from our ClashDaily report on the vandalism of his home just days before the election.
Hey Leftists: If The RIGHT Are The Threat To Democracy, Please Explain THIS …
Parnell has not conceded his race and is fighting the questionable practices in Pennsylvania just like President Trump is.
In a rather ballsy move, the lawsuit takes aim at the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the entire Pennsylvania General Assembly, Governor Tom Wolf, and Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Kathy Boockvar.
Gregory H. Teufel, an attorney for the plaintiffs, maintained that the complaint seeks to uphold elections in compliance with the state Constitution. The effort attempts not to block the certification of “proper mail-in absentee ballots,” but to prevent certification of results that would include mail-votes out of line with constitutional requirements, he said. “The Pennsylvania Constitution limits the extent of allowable mail-in voting and requires in-person voting” apart from specific and limited circumstances, Mr. Teufel said. The state received some 266,200 civilian mail-in and absentee ballots for the general election in 2016, the last presidential election year before Act 77 took effect. Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The lawsuit was a simple and powerful one — Act 77, the bill that was signed into law in 2019 by Governor Wolf to allow “no-excuse” mail-in voting was itself a violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution. It states that Act 77 is unconstitutional on its face because, in the state of Pennsylvania, changes to voting require a constitutional amendment.
Here’s the process for a constitutional amendment.
Pursuant to Article XI, Section 1, a proposed constitutional amendment must be approved by a majority vote of the members of both the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate in two consecutive legislative sessions;
the proposed amendment must be published for three months ahead of the next general election in two newspapers in each county;
it must be submitted to the qualified electors as a ballot question in the next general election and approved by a majority of those voting on the amendment.
Act 77 bypassed all of those steps and was just voted on in the legislature.
This lawsuit is rather significant because it could make all of the “no-excuse” mail-in ballots illegitimate, and would force the General Assembly to establish next steps including how to determine the election results for all of the November 3 races in the state.
Democrats are saying that this will disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters, Republicans say that Act 77 was passed unconstitutionally.
Republican Attorneys General have been critical of Pennsylvania’s expansion of mail-in voting.
GOP Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS Ruling Describes ‘Breathtaking Abuse’ In Pennsylvania Mail-In Voting
This just shows that Democrats in Pennsylvania just like Democrats in Congress don’t think much about the Constitution — state or federal — and just impose their will hoping that the courts will vindicate their actions.
Well, not so fast, PA Dems…
According to Legal Insurrection:
The Judge found, among other things, that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail on their PA constitutional claims, and that the matter was not moot even though PA had “certified” the results, because there were more steps to be taken [emphasis added]: Accordingly, in careful consideration [on November 25] of the exigencies and time constraints in this matter of statewide and national import, and the longstanding constitutional mandate that every citizen of this Commonwealth is entitled to no less than a fair and free election, it was necessary [on November 25] to preliminarily enjoin, on an emergency and temporary basis, Executive Respondents from undertaking any other actions with respect to the certification of the results of the presidential and vice presidential elections, if indeed anything else needs to be done, pending an evidentiary hearing to ascertain the facts of this matter and to determine if the dispute is moot…. Based upon the record before it, this Court has sufficient grounds to enjoin Respondents from further certification activities on an emergency preliminary basis, pending the results of the evidentiary hearing it had scheduled for this date, after which the Court would have determined if a preliminary injunction should issue.4 Since the Court is sitting in equity it has the power to fashion such relief as it is vitally important that the status quo be preserved pending further judicial scrutiny…. Additionally, Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77. Since this presents an issue of law which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties, this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim.
You can read the full decision here.
Legal Insurrection also notes that the judge is unclear on if the ruling does go in the way of the plaintiffs, it may not actually change the results, but it does mean that it could be headed to a much higher court.
Given how the PA Supreme Court has ruled previously on election matters, expanding procedures beyond what even the legislature adopted, I don’t see how this survives the PA Supreme Court. From there, the next stop is the U.S. Supreme Court where we know John Roberts and the three liberal Justice will defer to the state supreme court. But the Court is now 6-3, so a Roberts defection would not result in a 4-4 deadlock again if the 5 conservative Justices voted together. Source: Legal Insurrection
Don’t like what’s been happening with the election meddling? Have your say in a way Big Media can’t suppress:
Put it on a T-shirt…
Or a mug…
Don’t wait, get yours now!
To get the shirt, click here.
To get the mug, click here.


clashdaily--2020-11-28--HEY CNN: Arab Nation Denounces Muslim Brotherhood As ‘Terrorist Group’… Is This News?

The United Arab Emirates has officially denounced the Muslim Brotherhood in a fatwa and urges Muslims to reject any connections with them .
Some of their neighbors , on the other hand , not so much .
While some of their motives for rejecting the Muslim Brotherhood may not exactly align with Western priorities and sensibilities , the fact that they are denouncing them is still a very good thing .
( For example , MB likes elections — not because they have any great love for the consent of the governed , but they see opportunities to exploit elections @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for example , in Egypt after the so-called Arab Spring . )
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time .
Don ’ t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here : Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness .
If you ’ re still on Facebook , check out our ClashBriefing page .
Why is this denounciation a good thing ?
The Muslim Brotherhood ’ s stated goal in North America is as follows : The process of settlement is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the word means .
The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “ sabotaging ” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God ’ s religion is made victorious over all other religions .
Without this level of understanding , we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet .
It is a Muslim ’ s destiny to perform @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wherever he lands until the final hour comes , and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack .
But , would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal .
That particular subset of Islam is not coming here simply to be one among many equals in a system that allows everyone to flourish according to their own merit .
They have an agenda to break down what we have and replace it with values and systems more agreeable to their own .
It ’ s worth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elected officials , secular and otherwise , who hold a similarly dim view of America , and will willingly work together with such people to tear down what is , in hopes of building what might be .
A little about the role MB has been playing in America… Although the Fatwa Council of the UAE urged Muslims to steer clear of the MB , the situation is just the opposite in Western countries , where Muslim Brotherhood affiliates have managed to position themselves as the chief representatives of Muslims .
A lengthy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ unindicted co-conspirators ” in the Holy Land Foundation trial , see the list HERE ) was discovered to be funding the violent Muslim Brotherhood offshoot Hamas .
These groups nevertheless have been heavily involved in Leftist government initiatives , as was seen in the Obama administration .
Last year , there were attempts by the Trump Administration to designate the Muslim Brotherhood in America a terrorist organization , which would serve to ends its affiliated groups ’ persistent political interference , including their lobbying against the freedom of speech and promotion of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , however , this was not done .
The failure of this initiative was unsurprising given the complex dynamics of the Muslim Brotherhood and its influence , which can be seen at almost every level of society , and the ever-shifting role of Muslim Brotherhood operatives from country to country , as they continue to manipulate the rule of law against the West in both the public and private sectors .
–JihadWatch A little more about the denunciation itself , and how it was received regionally : The UAE Fatwa Council , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is used by the repressive Gulf monarchy to rubber stamp its policies , has declared the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organisation .
The highly controversial decision came during a virtual meeting on Monday led by Sheikh Abdullah Bin Bayyah , chairman of the council .
The move follows a similar pronouncement earlier this month by Saudi Arabia ’ s Council of Senior Scholars .
Eighteen scholar and ulama unions , including the International Union of Muslim Scholars ( IUMS ) , issued a joint statement against the decision of the Council of Senior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a terrorist organisation .
Meanwhile , Israel ’ s Foreign Ministry Arabic Twitter account hailed the Saudi council ’ s statement and said that it was “ pleased ” with the decision .
In its decision , the UAE Fatwa Council declared its full support for the Saudi council statement and called on all Muslims to reject the Brotherhood which they claimed “ works to divide the ranks and inflame discord and bloodshed ” .
–JihadWatch What else should we notice about the Muslim Brotherhood , from that same article ?
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ denouncing it , and which ones are actively supporting it .
Denouncing it are nations like UAE , Saudia Arabia , and Egypt .
Strengthening and arming it are nations like Qatar and Turkey .
Turkey is allegedly a NATO ally .
That could be an issue , don ’ t you think ?
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg .
While you ’ re at it , here ’ s his latest book : Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who endorses their agenda .
This book blows that nonsense all to hell .
From the stonking laptop of bestselling author , Doug Giles , comes a new book that focuses on Jesus ’ overt masculine traits like no other books have heretofore .
It ’ s informative , bold , hilarious , and scary .
Giles has concluded , after many years of scouring the scripture that , If Masculinity Is ‘ Toxic ’ , Call Jesus Radioactive .

The United Arab Emirates has officially denounced the Muslim Brotherhood in a fatwa and urges Muslims to reject any connections with them. Some of their neighbors, on the other hand, not so much.
While some of their motives for rejecting the Muslim Brotherhood may not exactly align with Western priorities and sensibilities, the fact that they are denouncing them is still a very good thing. (For example, MB likes elections — not because they have any great love for the consent of the governed, but they see opportunities to exploit elections to gain power like they did, for example, in Egypt after the so-called Arab Spring.)
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news — subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Become a Clash Insider! Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.
Join our MeWe group to get all the ClashDaily goodness.
If you’re still on Facebook, check out our ClashBriefing page.
Stay Rowdy!
Why is this denounciation a good thing?
The Muslim Brotherhood’s stated goal in North America is as follows:
The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Process” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal.
That particular subset of Islam is not coming here simply to be one among many equals in a system that allows everyone to flourish according to their own merit. They have an agenda to break down what we have and replace it with values and systems more agreeable to their own. It’s worth noting that we have no shortage of elected officials, secular and otherwise, who hold a similarly dim view of America, and will willingly work together with such people to tear down what is, in hopes of building what might be.
A little about the role MB has been playing in America…
Although the Fatwa Council of the UAE urged Muslims to steer clear of the MB, the situation is just the opposite in Western countries, where Muslim Brotherhood affiliates have managed to position themselves as the chief representatives of Muslims. A lengthy list of Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organizations (designated “unindicted co-conspirators” in the Holy Land Foundation trial, see the list HERE) was discovered to be funding the violent Muslim Brotherhood offshoot Hamas. These groups nevertheless have been heavily involved in Leftist government initiatives, as was seen in the Obama administration. Last year, there were attempts by the Trump Administration to designate the Muslim Brotherhood in America a terrorist organization, which would serve to ends its affiliated groups’ persistent political interference, including their lobbying against the freedom of speech and promotion of the “Islamophobia” subterfuge. Ultimately, however, this was not done. The failure of this initiative was unsurprising given the complex dynamics of the Muslim Brotherhood and its influence, which can be seen at almost every level of society, and the ever-shifting role of Muslim Brotherhood operatives from country to country, as they continue to manipulate the rule of law against the West in both the public and private sectors. –JihadWatch
A little more about the denunciation itself, and how it was received regionally:
The UAE Fatwa Council, a state led religious body which critics say is used by the repressive Gulf monarchy to rubber stamp its policies, has declared the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organisation. The highly controversial decision came during a virtual meeting on Monday led by Sheikh Abdullah Bin Bayyah, chairman of the council. The move follows a similar pronouncement earlier this month by Saudi Arabia’s Council of Senior Scholars. Eighteen scholar and ulama unions, including the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), issued a joint statement against the decision of the Council of Senior Scholars rejecting the designation of the Brotherhood as a terrorist organisation. Meanwhile, Israel’s Foreign Ministry Arabic Twitter account hailed the Saudi council’s statement and said that it was “pleased” with the decision. In its decision, the UAE Fatwa Council declared its full support for the Saudi council statement and called on all Muslims to reject the Brotherhood which they claimed “works to divide the ranks and inflame discord and bloodshed”. –JihadWatch
What else should we notice about the Muslim Brotherhood, from that same article?
We should take note of which countries are denouncing it, and which ones are actively supporting it.
Denouncing it are nations like UAE, Saudia Arabia, and Egypt.
Strengthening and arming it are nations like Qatar and Turkey.
Turkey is allegedly a NATO ally. That could be an issue, don’t you think?
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg. While you’re at it, here’s his latest book:
Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to paint Jesus as a non-offensive bearded woman who endorses their agenda. This book blows that nonsense all to hell. From the stonking laptop of bestselling author, Doug Giles, comes a new book that focuses on Jesus’ overt masculine traits like no other books have heretofore. It’s informative, bold, hilarious, and scary. Giles has concluded, after many years of scouring the scripture that, If Masculinity Is ‘Toxic’, Call Jesus Radioactive.