clashdaily--2020-01-21--HEY AOC: Since Trump GAVE Puerto Rico Aid, And THEY Mismanaged It… When’s Your Apology?

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the rest of the Democrats made very public claims that Trump didn ’ t give Puerto Rico the aid they needed after a Hurricane .
She lied .
There were two competing narratives after Hurricane Maria smashed its way through Puerto Rico .
One of them was Trump claiming the requested aid had been delivered but was woefully mismanaged by the local government .
The other was Puerto Rican politicians who used the opportunity to showboat and proclaim their disdain for Trump .
One even had shirts made while the city she was elected to run was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
‘ Never let a crisis go to waste ’ , amirite ?
AOC even went to Copenhagen and blasted ‘ racist ’ America for the plight of Puerto Rico .
Trending : Total Trash : Compare What Conservative And Liberal Groups Did With Their Post-Protest Refuse At the 8 minute mark , she was throwing around words like ‘ Colonialism ’ and ‘ Imperialism ’ while falsely claiming that a storm whose aftermath ( not the actual storm , mind you ) killed her grandfather was somehow the result of climate change @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made of the role government ineptitude or obvious corruption played in the aftermath . )
Full story w/ video here : DRAMA QUEEN : AOC ’ s Weepy Copenhagen Speech Makes The ‘ How Dare You ’ One Seem Measured What ACTUALLY happened in Puerto Rico ?
Well , a government official was just fired for cause .
Is that interesting ?
It should be if you hear what the cause was .
Government officials in Puerto Rico began distributing much-needed disaster aid that went unused for years while residents suffered in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recently a batch of crippling earthquakes .
The once-abandoned supplies — which included thousands of sealed cases of water bottles , pallets of food , diapers , baby formula and cots — were distributed on Monday to shelters in communities where powerful earthquakes leveled homes in recent weeks and caused an estimated $ 110 million in damages , according to government officials .
The unused aid , believed to have been delivered during Hurricane Maria in 2017 , was discovered in an abandoned government-operated warehouse in the southwestern city of Ponce over the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protests .
Source : ABC Puerto Rico – Gov .
Wanda Vázquez fired the heads of Puerto Rico ’ s housing and family departments Sunday in the latest fallout over the discovery of a warehouse filled with emergency supplies dating from Hurricane Maria in 2017 .
The removal of Housing Secretary Fernando Gil and Department of Family Secretary Glorimar Andújar came a day after the governor fired the director of the emergency management agency .
Vázquez fired him hours after a Facebook video showed angry people breaking into the warehouse in an area @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an earthquake .
“ There have been actions by government officials that have been completely unacceptable , ” the governor said Sunday .
…When asked how it was possible that she did not know about the existence of the warehouse , Vázquez replied , “ That ’ s what the head of agencies are for … to inform the governor.
” Vázquez said she worried that the warehouse discovery and the fallout would affect the credibility of the territorial government in Washington , which has temporarily retained some federal funds for Maria relief @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Source : USAToday ‘ Worried that the warehouse discovery and the fallout would affect the credibility of the territorial government ?
‘ So , with some help from the complicit media , we went from an official story of Trump failing to deliver badly-needed supplies to Puerto Rico ( for reasons that were portrayed as explicitly racist ) and painting him as a liar when he claimed that help came , but was mismanaged by corrupt and or incompetent managers… to Trump being proven entirely right long after the damage was done .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ fake news ?

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the rest of the Democrats made very public claims that Trump didn’t give Puerto Rico the aid they needed after a Hurricane. She lied.
There were two competing narratives after Hurricane Maria smashed its way through Puerto Rico. One of them was Trump claiming the requested aid had been delivered but was woefully mismanaged by the local government. The other was Puerto Rican politicians who used the opportunity to showboat and proclaim their disdain for Trump.
One even had shirts made while the city she was elected to run was devastated. Because, well, priorities. ‘Never let a crisis go to waste’, amirite?
AOC even went to Copenhagen and blasted ‘racist’ America for the plight of Puerto Rico.
At the 8 minute mark, she was throwing around words like ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Imperialism’ while falsely claiming that a storm whose aftermath (not the actual storm, mind you) killed her grandfather was somehow the result of climate change. (We notice no mention was made of the role government ineptitude or obvious corruption played in the aftermath.)
Full story w/ video here: DRAMA QUEEN: AOC’s Weepy Copenhagen Speech Makes The ‘How Dare You’ One Seem Measured
What ACTUALLY happened in Puerto Rico?
Well, a government official was just fired for cause. Is that interesting? It should be if you hear what the cause was.
#Breaking: The Governor of Puerto Rico has been exposed by withholding Emergency aid disaster relief from Hurricane Maria. Local firefighters have discovered a warehouse stuffed full off aid supplies. #US #PuertoRico pic.twitter.com/oQFZHnadUJ — Sotiri Dimpinoudis (@sotiridi) January 19, 2020
Government officials in Puerto Rico began distributing much-needed disaster aid that went unused for years while residents suffered in the wake of a deadly hurricane and more recently a batch of crippling earthquakes. The once-abandoned supplies — which included thousands of sealed cases of water bottles, pallets of food, diapers, baby formula and cots — were distributed on Monday to shelters in communities where powerful earthquakes leveled homes in recent weeks and caused an estimated $110 million in damages, according to government officials. The unused aid, believed to have been delivered during Hurricane Maria in 2017, was discovered in an abandoned government-operated warehouse in the southwestern city of Ponce over the weekend, sparking a wave of angry protests.
Source: ABC
Puerto Ricans, understandably, are PISSED.
#NewsAlert: Thousands of protestors are taking it once again on the streets of Puerto Rico, after a 200.000 square feet warehouse full of emergency aid supplies were found rotting away, remember that previous summer the people of the island have protested… 1/2#PuertoRico pic.twitter.com/zjzqjT4bYm — Sotiri Dimpinoudis (@sotiridi) January 20, 2020
resulting in the ousting of the Governor of the Island of Puerto Rico “Ricardo Rosselló”, and that people are now furious off the current Governor “Wanda Vázquez Garced” who are now under investigation by the #FBI and others, for the mishandling of aid supplies. 2/2#PuertoRico pic.twitter.com/yUVHWAow4P — Sotiri Dimpinoudis (@sotiridi) January 20, 2020
Puerto Rico – Gov. Wanda Vázquez fired the heads of Puerto Rico’s housing and family departments Sunday in the latest fallout over the discovery of a warehouse filled with emergency supplies dating from Hurricane Maria in 2017. The removal of Housing Secretary Fernando Gil and Department of Family Secretary Glorimar Andújar came a day after the governor fired the director of the emergency management agency. Vázquez fired him hours after a Facebook video showed angry people breaking into the warehouse in an area where thousands have been in shelters since an earthquake. “There have been actions by government officials that have been completely unacceptable,” the governor said Sunday. …When asked how it was possible that she did not know about the existence of the warehouse, Vázquez replied, “That’s what the head of agencies are for … to inform the governor.” Vázquez said she worried that the warehouse discovery and the fallout would affect the credibility of the territorial government in Washington, which has temporarily retained some federal funds for Maria relief amid concerns of corruption and mismanagement.
Source: USAToday
‘Worried that the warehouse discovery and the fallout would affect the credibility of the territorial government?‘
Gee, ya think?
So, with some help from the complicit media, we went from an official story of Trump failing to deliver badly-needed supplies to Puerto Rico (for reasons that were portrayed as explicitly racist) and painting him as a liar when he claimed that help came, but was mismanaged by corrupt and or incompetent managers… to Trump being proven entirely right long after the damage was done.
And you wonder why we call them fake news?


clashdaily--2020-01-22--Did Rep. Adam Schiff Mischaracterize Evidence In Impeachment Hearing? New Documents Suggest He Did…

Was Schifty being sinister or just sloppy in getting this so very , very wrong ?
The Schiff-weasel was living down to his reputation in his handling ( ‘ massaging ’ ) of MORE evidence allegedly ‘ against ’ Trump .
It was the redacted the parts that made his allegations so obiously false .
Some of the information used in the House Impeachment fracas may have been ‘ mischaracterized ’ by Schiff .
Trending : Total Trash : Compare What Conservative And Liberal Groups Did With Their Post-Protest Refuse The problem stems from a letter that Schiff sent to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) last week that summarizes “ a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas , an indicted former associate of Trump ’ s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani , ” Politico reported .
“ In one section of the letter , Schiff claims that Parnas ‘ continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky , ’ citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani : ‘ trying to get us mr Z.
’ The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff ’ s letter — was redacted.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ version of the exchange shows that several days later , Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky , the founder of Burisma , followed by a text message to Giuliani that states : ‘ mr Z answers my brother.
’ That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.
” Democrat officials did not dispute the suggestion that Schiff ’ s claim was false .
Source : DailyWire Is there ANY portion of the case they are trying to throw at the President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ google-eyed weasel ’ s lies ?
Anything at all ?
Here ’ s what the Republicans said in response : “ The most charitable view of the situation is that [ Schiff ’ s ] staff committed the equivalent of Congressional malpractice by not looking more than an inch deep to determine the facts before foisting this erroneous information on his colleagues and the American public , ” one senior GOP aide told Politico .
“ But given the selective redactions and contextual clues , it seems as though Chairman Schiff sought to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mykola Zlochevsky as an insidious one with the President of Ukraine simply because both of their surnames start with the letter Z.
” Source : DailyWire As the saying goes , to a man with a hammer , every problem looks like a nail .
Schiff doesn ’ t have a hammer , but he is a writer of fiction .
So , yeah , there ’ s that .
This is why evidence needs to be open to scrutiny and cross-examination .
But of course , they were ‘ in a hurry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he went over to the Senate ?
Of course not .
The Effeminization Of The American Male by Doug Giles Doug Giles , best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog , ClashDaily.com , has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity .
That is , if the man-child will put down his frappuccino ; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome .
Buy Now : @ @ @ @ @ @

Was Schifty being sinister or just sloppy in getting this so very, very wrong?
The Schiff-weasel was living down to his reputation in his handling (‘massaging’) of MORE evidence allegedly ‘against’ Trump. It was the redacted the parts that made his allegations so obiously false.
Some of the information used in the House Impeachment fracas may have been ‘mischaracterized’ by Schiff.
The problem stems from a letter that Schiff sent to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) last week that summarizes “a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani,” Politico reported. “In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas ‘continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,’ citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: ‘trying to get us mr Z.’ The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.” Politico added, “But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: ‘mr Z answers my brother.’ That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.” Democrat officials did not dispute the suggestion that Schiff’s claim was false.
Source: DailyWire
Is there ANY portion of the case they are trying to throw at the President that ISN’T tainted by that google-eyed weasel’s lies?
Anything at all?
Here’s what the Republicans said in response:
“The most charitable view of the situation is that [Schiff’s] staff committed the equivalent of Congressional malpractice by not looking more than an inch deep to determine the facts before foisting this erroneous information on his colleagues and the American public,” one senior GOP aide told Politico. “But given the selective redactions and contextual clues, it seems as though Chairman Schiff sought to portray an innocuous meeting with Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky as an insidious one with the President of Ukraine simply because both of their surnames start with the letter Z.”
Source: DailyWire
As the saying goes, to a man with a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. Schiff doesn’t have a hammer, but he is a writer of fiction. So, yeah, there’s that.
This is why evidence needs to be open to scrutiny and cross-examination. But of course, they were ‘in a hurry’.
And was anything changed when he went over to the Senate? Of course not.
Watch Schiff make up more fake dialogue It was bad enough he made up the President's phone call in the House, now he's fabricating what the president of Ukraine said (no pressure) in the Senate Democrats have no case, so they just make schiff up pic.twitter.com/R2nNJrCiZt — Elizabeth Harrington (@LizRNC) January 22, 2020
The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now:The Effeminization Of The American Male


clashdaily--2020-01-22--Man Stabs And Kills His Pro-Trump Boss After Political Dispute

If bros in red MAGA hats are such a ‘ dangerous menace ’ , why are they so frequently the TARGETS of violence in these news stories ?
People get their hats stolen , or they are attacked by strangers in the street for wearing Trump swag .
Some guy pulled a gun in a Sam ’ s Club over it .
We just reported about a 40-something guy who spit on a retiree ( and cancer patient ) while he was minding his own business in a restaurant .
The attempted assassination of Scalise and others at the baseball @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just released videos about paid organizers from the Bernie Sanders team that are Communists openly daydreaming about dissolving our government and installing a dictator… even if it means taking up arms to do it .
Trending : Total Trash : Compare What Conservative And Liberal Groups Did With Their Post-Protest Refuse And now we have a murder .
Over freaking political differences .
Do these people not realize ( or care ? )
that elections are the PEACEFUL alternative to armed rebellion ?
The safety valve on the will of the people ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ‘ childhood friend and co-worker ’ that he gutted with a trowel : A construction worker with anti-government beliefs is accused of fatally stabbing his boss , who was a “ proud and outspoken American and pro-Donald Trump , ” according to an Orange County sheriff ’ s arrest affidavit .
Mason Trever Toney , 28 , was arrested Monday on murder charges in the death of his boss , William Knight , 28 .
…Witnesses said Toney and Knight were friends outside of the workplace , and Knight picked up Toney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Toney and Knight got into an argument , possibly over their opposing views of the U.S. government .
According to the affidavit , Toney is very outspoken about his beliefs and has said the government is out to get him .
Witnesses said they heard Knight yell for help and saw Toney repeatedly stabbing him with a trowel , according to the affidavit .
Source : ClickOrlando What makes it even worse than this guy stabbing his friend and employer with a trowel at ten in the morning over politcs ?
A ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the victim ’ s body .
Gee , does that ’ sound ‘ pre-meditated ’ to you ?
Yeah , these ‘ progressive ’ Democrats are the ‘ party of peace ’ in the same way that jihadi belong to a ‘ religion of peace ’ .
Some of the stories mentioned above : • Man Gets Jail Time For Spitting On A Senior With MAGA Hat • Chick SPITS On Eric Trump At Restaurant – What Should Happen To Her ?
• Dear CNN : The Entire Trump Family Has Received ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Is That News ?
And in case you think these are ‘ isolated incidents ’ here are some more… • Hey CNN : James Hodgkinson , The Bernie Bro Who Shot Scalise , Yelled Out “ This is For… ” • Omar Celebrates Violent Attack On Rand Paul – But It ’ s OK , She ’ s A Liberal Woman

If bros in red MAGA hats are such a ‘dangerous menace’, why are they so frequently the TARGETS of violence in these news stories?
People get their hats stolen, or they are attacked by strangers in the street for wearing Trump swag. Some guy pulled a gun in a Sam’s Club over it. We just reported about a 40-something guy who spit on a retiree (and cancer patient) while he was minding his own business in a restaurant.
The attempted assassination of Scalise and others at the baseball game was politically motivated.
Project Veritas just released videos about paid organizers from the Bernie Sanders team that are Communists openly daydreaming about dissolving our government and installing a dictator… even if it means taking up arms to do it.
And now we have a murder. Over freaking political differences.
Do these people not realize (or care?) that elections are the PEACEFUL alternative to armed rebellion? The safety valve on the will of the people?
The events themselves:
Report about the motivation and relationship with the ‘childhood friend and co-worker’ that he gutted with a trowel:
A construction worker with anti-government beliefs is accused of fatally stabbing his boss, who was a “proud and outspoken American and pro-Donald Trump,” according to an Orange County sheriff’s arrest affidavit. Mason Trever Toney, 28, was arrested Monday on murder charges in the death of his boss, William Knight, 28. …Witnesses said Toney and Knight were friends outside of the workplace, and Knight picked up Toney earlier in the day. Witnesses said Toney and Knight got into an argument, possibly over their opposing views of the U.S. government. According to the affidavit, Toney is very outspoken about his beliefs and has said the government is out to get him. Witnesses said they heard Knight yell for help and saw Toney repeatedly stabbing him with a trowel, according to the affidavit.
Source: ClickOrlando
What makes it even worse than this guy stabbing his friend and employer with a trowel at ten in the morning over politcs?
(Aside from the unarmed observers ‘throwing things’ at the killer as he ran away?)
A ‘brand new’ flag was draped over the victim’s body.
Gee, does that’ sound ‘pre-meditated’ to you?
Yeah, these ‘progressive’ Democrats are the ‘party of peace’ in the same way that jihadi belong to a ‘religion of peace’.
Some of the stories mentioned above:
And in case you think these are ‘isolated incidents’ here are some more…


clashdaily--2020-01-22--BOOM! Jay Sekulow Absolutely Destroys The Impeachment Schiff-Show (VIDEO)

If this opening is any indication , these hearings will be as lopsided as Mcgregor ’ s win in UFC 246 , with Sekulow playing the role of Connor ’ s left shoulder .
When this is finally over , the anti-constitutional Schiff-disturbers will look like they ’ ve been hit by a truck .
Now that we ’ re finally in a forum where the President ( the accused ) can have HIS side of the story heard , Schiff ’ s grandstanding isn ’ t quite as grandiose .
If anything , it gets shown up as silly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ someone who knows what the hell he is doing .
Trump ’ s team clearly knows what the Hell they are doing .
Trending : Total Trash : Compare What Conservative And Liberal Groups Did With Their Post-Protest Refuse After Schiff did his usual tapdancing and preening and melodrama in his opening comments , Sekulow answered back .
Here ’ s what he had to say : Riffing off of Schiff ’ s own statement about ‘ the eyes of the Founders ’ , he proceeded to take apart what Schiff had just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Manager Schiff , ‘ courts have no role ’ , privileges don ’ t apply , what happened in the past , we should just ignore .
In fact , Manager Schiff just said , ‘ to summarize my colleagues ’ defense of the President , not in those words of course ’ .
That ’ s not the first time Mr. Schiff has put words into transcripts that did not exist .
Mr. Schiff also talked about a trifecta .
I ’ ll give you a trifecta .
During the proceedings that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the President was denied the right to cross-examine witnesses .
The President was denied the right to access evidence , and the President was denied the right to have counsel present at hearings .
THAT ’ s a ‘ trifecta ’ .
A trifecta that violates the Constitution of the United States .
Mr. Schiff did say that the courts don ’ t really have a role in this .
Executive Privilege , why would that matter ?
It matters because it ’ s based in the Constitution of the United States .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that are on trial , the Senate .
He also said , and others did , that you are not capable of abiding by your oath .
And then we had the invocation of the ghost of the Muller Report .
I know something about that report .
It came up empty on the issue of ‘ Collusion with Russia ’ .
There was no obstruction , in fact , to the contrary of what these managers say today , came to the exact OPPOSITE conclusions of what they say .
As painful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that pencil-necked Schiff-weasel drone on , at least watching Trump ’ s team light him up like this will be the silver lining to an otherwise tedious process .

If this opening is any indication, these hearings will be as lopsided as Mcgregor’s win in UFC 246, with Sekulow playing the role of Connor’s left shoulder.
When this is finally over, the anti-constitutional Schiff-disturbers will look like they’ve been hit by a truck.
Now that we’re finally in a forum where the President (the accused) can have HIS side of the story heard, Schiff’s grandstanding isn’t quite as grandiose. If anything, it gets shown up as silly and sophomoric.
Especially when countered by someone who knows what the hell he is doing. Trump’s team clearly knows what the Hell they are doing.
After Schiff did his usual tapdancing and preening and melodrama in his opening comments, Sekulow answered back.
Here’s what he had to say:
Jay Sekulow, chief counsel for President Trump, criticizes lead House impeachment manager Adam Schiff and calls on senators to approve the impeachment resolution that sets up the rules for the Senate trial https://t.co/gSRupclymD pic.twitter.com/O8Dq2PUQFq — ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) January 21, 2020
Riffing off of Schiff’s own statement about ‘the eyes of the Founders’, he proceeded to take apart what Schiff had just said:
What we just heard from Manager Schiff, ‘courts have no role’, privileges don’t apply, what happened in the past, we should just ignore. In fact, Manager Schiff just said, ‘to summarize my colleagues’ defense of the President, not in those words of course’. That’s not the first time Mr. Schiff has put words into transcripts that did not exist. Mr. Schiff also talked about a trifecta. I’ll give you a trifecta. During the proceedings that took place before the judiciary committee, the President was denied the right to cross-examine witnesses. The President was denied the right to access evidence, and the President was denied the right to have counsel present at hearings. THAT’s a ‘trifecta’. A trifecta that violates the Constitution of the United States. Mr. Schiff did say that the courts don’t really have a role in this. Executive Privilege, why would that matter? It matters because it’s based in the Constitution of the United States. One manager said that it was YOU that are on trial, the Senate. He also said, and others did, that you are not capable of abiding by your oath. And then we had the invocation of the ghost of the Muller Report. I know something about that report. It came up empty on the issue of ‘Collusion with Russia’. There was no obstruction, in fact, to the contrary of what these managers say today, came to the exact OPPOSITE conclusions of what they say.
As painful as it will be to listen to that pencil-necked Schiff-weasel drone on, at least watching Trump’s team light him up like this will be the silver lining to an otherwise tedious process.


clashdaily--2020-01-22--WATCH: Tom Brokaw Confronts Joe Biden On Corruption Relating To Son Hunter In 2008

How come this story on Biden corruption was legitimate twelve years ago , but gets swept under the rug today ?
There was a time where having a ( D ) after your name wasn ’ t always enough to keep the tough questions at bay .
That was before today ’ s Media ( D ) started being open about the ( D ) after their industry name .
Trending : Total Trash : Compare What Conservative And Liberal Groups Did With Their Post-Protest Refuse It ’ s been a long time since those days in the PartisanPress .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ shaking the ‘ journalist ’ habit , or he lucked into this story and found it worth following .
Either way , there was a time only 12 years ago , where the Media on the Left asked Democrat politicians the hard questions about corruption .
During the years that Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. was helping the credit card industry win passage of a law making it harder for consumers to file for bankruptcy protection , his son had a consulting agreement that lasted five years with one of the largest companies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Senator Barack Obama ’ s presidential campaign acknowledged Sunday .
Mr. Biden ’ s son , Hunter , received consulting fees from the MBNA Corporation from 2001 to 2005 for work on online banking issues .
Aides to Mr. Obama , who chose Mr. Biden as his vice-presidential running mate on Saturday , would not say how much the younger Mr. Biden , who works as both a lawyer and lobbyist in Washington , had received , though a company official had once described him as having a $ 100,000 a year retainer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never lobbied for MBNA and that there was nothing improper about the payments .
Campaign officials acknowledged that the connection between the Bidens and MBNA , the enormous financial services company then based in their home state of Delaware , was one of the most sensitive issues they examined while vetting the senator for a spot on the ticket .
But now , despite mounting evidence to support Biden ’ s family being corrupt , the Media ( D ) have locked their shields and formed a defensive circle around Joe .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more interested in preserving his legacy than they are defending the truth .
What a sad admission to make about the ‘ Journalist ’ class today .
Now if we could only figure out why the ratings for these ‘ news ’ shows keep sinking like a sunset .
• SMOKING GUN : Rudy G Found Ukranian Accounting Records From 2017… Obama & Biden Have Some ‘ Splaining To Do • Hunter ’ s Not Alone : 5 Members Of Joe Biden ’ s Family Got Rich Through His Connections • New Court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Theft ’ Of His Deceased Brother , Beau • WATCH : Here ’ s The 60 Minutes Video Soros DOESN ’ T Want You To SEE

How come this story on Biden corruption was legitimate twelve years ago, but gets swept under the rug today?
Anyone?
Bueller?
There was a time where having a (D) after your name wasn’t always enough to keep the tough questions at bay. That was before today’s Media(D) started being open about the (D) after their industry name.
It’s been a long time since those days in the PartisanPress.
And either Brokow had a hard time shaking the ‘journalist’ habit, or he lucked into this story and found it worth following.
Either way, there was a time only 12 years ago, where the Media on the Left asked Democrat politicians the hard questions about corruption.
During the years that Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. was helping the credit card industry win passage of a law making it harder for consumers to file for bankruptcy protection, his son had a consulting agreement that lasted five years with one of the largest companies pushing for the changes, aides to Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign acknowledged Sunday. Mr. Biden’s son, Hunter, received consulting fees from the MBNA Corporation from 2001 to 2005 for work on online banking issues. Aides to Mr. Obama, who chose Mr. Biden as his vice-presidential running mate on Saturday, would not say how much the younger Mr. Biden, who works as both a lawyer and lobbyist in Washington, had received, though a company official had once described him as having a $100,000 a year retainer. But Obama aides said he had never lobbied for MBNA and that there was nothing improper about the payments. Campaign officials acknowledged that the connection between the Bidens and MBNA, the enormous financial services company then based in their home state of Delaware, was one of the most sensitive issues they examined while vetting the senator for a spot on the ticket. Source: New York Times, August 24, 2008.
Tom Brokaw calling out Joe-Hunter Biden’s corruption in 2008: “Wasn’t it inappropriate for someone like you in the middle of all this to have your son collecting money from this big credit card company while you were on the floor protecting its interests?” pic.twitter.com/CORqFD6w1a — Ibrahim (@ibrahimpols) October 5, 2019
But now, despite mounting evidence to support Biden’s family being corrupt, the Media(D) have locked their shields and formed a defensive circle around Joe.
It’s almost as if they are more interested in preserving his legacy than they are defending the truth.
What a sad admission to make about the ‘Journalist’ class today.
Now if we could only figure out why the ratings for these ‘news’ shows keep sinking like a sunset.
Related…


clashdaily--2020-01-23--CNN Political Analyst Makes Up A Conversation Between Two Republican Senators — Gets Dragged On Twit

CNN Political Analyst Makes Up A Conversation Between Two Republican Senators — Gets Dragged On Twitter

His defense is almost as lame as his tweets .
Almost .
Joe Lockhart is a political analyst at CNN who was a former Clinton White House official .
On Wednesday , Lockhart , who is covering the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump tweeted , “ Overheard convo between two Republican Senators who only watch Fox News .
‘ is this stuff real ?
I haven ’ t heard any of this before .
I thought it was all about a server .
If half the stuff Schiff is saying is true , we ’ re up shit ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has exculpatory evidence .
[ ‘ ] ” Trending : Man Stabs And Kills His Pro-Trump Boss After Political Dispute After the tweet started getting some pushback , he tweeted , “ Ok maybe I made up the convo , but you know that ’ s exactly what they ’ re thinking.
” Is it , Joe ?
Is that what Republican Senators are thinking ?
They ’ re not thinking that House Democrats that didn ’ t bother to do their work properly and impeached the President without a single criminal charge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their work for them ?
They ’ re not thinking that this is a bold attempt to overturn the 2016 election and interfere in the 2020 election ?
They ’ re not thinking that ?
Who knew .
It turns out that Joe isn ’ t just a former Clinton White House official and a CNN political analyst — as Stephen Miller pointed out , he also hosts a podcast called “ Words Matter.
” Some of the conservative blue-checks dragged him for his ridiculous tweets .
Lockhart attempted to diffuse the situation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” but Fox News is clearly a problem because Fox viewers are ignorant having been sheltered from the predominant leftwing news bias .
Sure , it could be that .
Or that the Media ( D ) is selectively covering the news and inserts bias into reportage , Mr. CNN Analyst Who Used To Work For A Democrat President .
Fox News and MSNBC can tilt right and left respectively , but CNN is supposed to be the middle-of-the-road , unbiased news that gives equal time to both sides .
Is that happening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like his CNN bosses clearly don ’ t comprehend what satire is .
Perhaps they should spend some time reading the Babylon Bee to grasp the nuance of satire instead of going after them .
Even the Babylon Bee commented on Lockhart ’ s original post .
Joe also tweeted that he thought it was funny that his “ joke ” poked a bear .
Here ’ s the thing , Joe , it wasn ’ t a joke .
You know how these things work .
The original tweet gets attention — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Jennifer Rubin had promoted the tweet — and the correction gets ignored .
Shortly after his “ relax ” tweet , he tweeted out that disinformation is being sown by those who are outside of the leftwing Media ( D ) bubble .
Not half an hour after he posts a fake conversation that he completely made up to push a narrative , he is railing against the Trump administration using a tweet by Associated Press White House reporter , Jill Colvin .
Finally , he made it clear that despite the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t supposed to be a means of entertainment .
Someone ought to tell Rep. Adam Schiff ( D-CA ) that this isn ’ t a forum for melodramatic grandstanding with his political thriller screenplay .
Hell , someone should tell Joe Lockhart who posted a fictional conversation pretending that it was real and insisting that even though it isn ’ t “ factually correct ” it ’ s clearly “ morally right .
”

His defense is almost as lame as his tweets. Almost.
Joe Lockhart is a political analyst at CNN who was a former Clinton White House official.
On Wednesday, Lockhart, who is covering the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump tweeted, “Overheard convo between two Republican Senators who only watch Fox News. ‘is this stuff real? I haven’t heard any of this before. I thought it was all about a server. If half the stuff Schiff is saying is true, we’re up shit’s creek. Hope the White House has exculpatory evidence.[‘]”
After the tweet started getting some pushback, he tweeted, “Ok maybe I made up the convo, but you know that’s exactly what they’re thinking.”
Is it, Joe? Is that what Republican Senators are thinking? They’re not thinking that House Democrats that didn’t bother to do their work properly and impeached the President without a single criminal charge are now hoping that Senate will do their work for them? They’re not thinking that this is a bold attempt to overturn the 2016 election and interfere in the 2020 election? They’re not thinking that? Who knew.
It turns out that Joe isn’t just a former Clinton White House official and a CNN political analyst — as Stephen Miller pointed out, he also hosts a podcast called “Words Matter.”
Some of the conservative blue-checks dragged him for his ridiculous tweets.
Yeah, this happened. Don’t take up screenwriting, Joe. You suck at dialogue. https://t.co/YhEO6NLToO — GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) January 22, 2020
You would think someone who's attempting to cover Trump's impeachment trial seriously wouldn't willingly mislead his audience and spread disinformation in a sad attempt at satire. https://t.co/B7L8E5HaiH — Siraj Hashmi (@SirajAHashmi) January 22, 2020
Hey, @CNN—will there be any consequences for your Political Analyst sharing fake news on Twitter? Or will he continue to be allowed on air just like the rest of the Never-Trump liars you give a platform to? ? https://t.co/VOgfbeinKm — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) January 22, 2020
Did I tell you the one about the CNN analyst who spread a false narrative, watched it go viral, then waited 10 minutes to admit he made it all up? This is the bullshit that discredits news organizations. — Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) January 22, 2020
Lockhart attempted to diffuse the situation by saying it was all “satire” but Fox News is clearly a problem because Fox viewers are ignorant having been sheltered from the predominant leftwing news bias.
Sure, it could be that. Or that the Media(D) is selectively covering the news and inserts bias into reportage, Mr. CNN Analyst Who Used To Work For A Democrat President. Fox News and MSNBC can tilt right and left respectively, but CNN is supposed to be the middle-of-the-road, unbiased news that gives equal time to both sides. Is that happening, genius?
Also, Lockhart, like his CNN bosses clearly don’t comprehend what satire is. Perhaps they should spend some time reading the Babylon Bee to grasp the nuance of satire instead of going after them.
Even the Babylon Bee commented on Lockhart’s original post.
Leave the satire to us; we'll leave the fake news to you. — The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) January 22, 2020
Joe also tweeted that he thought it was funny that his “joke” poked a bear.
Here’s the thing, Joe, it wasn’t a joke. You know how these things work. The original tweet gets attention — even WaPo’s “conservative blogger” Jennifer Rubin had promoted the tweet — and the correction gets ignored.
Seems like I poked the bear today. The purveyors of Pizzagate and the Seth Rich conspiracy are lecturing me on honesty. I told a joke, you guys are a destructive joke that is killing our democracy. Other than that, hope you’re enjoying the trial and have a nice evening — Joe Lockhart (@joelockhart) January 22, 2020
Shortly after his “relax” tweet, he tweeted out that disinformation is being sown by those who are outside of the leftwing Media(D) bubble.
Not half an hour after he posts a fake conversation that he completely made up to push a narrative, he is railing against the Trump administration using a tweet by Associated Press White House reporter, Jill Colvin.
Finally, he made it clear that despite the excitement by Democrats, impeachment isn’t supposed to be a means of entertainment.
Someone ought to tell Rep. Adam Schiff(D-CA) that this isn’t a forum for melodramatic grandstanding with his political thriller screenplay.
Hell, someone should tell Joe Lockhart who posted a fictional conversation pretending that it was real and insisting that even though it isn’t “factually correct” it’s clearly “morally right.”


clashdaily--2020-01-23--EPIC: Baby Ryan ‘Sings’ Thunderstruck And It’s AWESOME! (Video)

This is AC/DC like you ’ ve NEVER seen it before .
Yes .
That ’ s ‘ Classic Rock @ @ @ @ @ THAT happen ?
For anyone too young to have seen it the first time around @ @ @ @ @ original song .
It was one of the Rock ‘ Anthems ’ of its day @ @ @ @ @ And Kills His Pro-Trump Boss After Political Dispute One proud parent took video of his @ @ @ @ @ all the things babies do , and cut samples of the sounds he made into @ @ @ @ @ must have taken a TON of work getting it just right .
And when he @ @ @ @ @ AWESOME !
He isn ’ t the first person to give an unusual tribute to @ @ @ @ @ A few years back , we featured the ‘ 2 Cellos ’ version of it @ @ @ @ @ song stands apart , obviously .
But which of these two tributes do you like @ @

This is AC/DC like you’ve NEVER seen it before.
Fans of ‘Classic Rock’ will remember Thunderstruck.
Yes. That’s ‘Classic Rock’ now. How did THAT happen?
For anyone too young to have seen it the first time around, here’s the original song. It was one of the Rock ‘Anthems’ of its day.
One proud parent took video of his son ‘Ryan’ doing all the things babies do, and cut samples of the sounds he made into a music video.
It must have taken a TON of work getting it just right. And when he was finished, it was AWESOME!
He isn’t the first person to give an unusual tribute to this particular AC/DC track.
A few years back, we featured the ‘2 Cellos’ version of it, here.
The original song stands apart, obviously.
But which of these two tributes do you like best?


clashdaily--2020-01-23--AOC Says The Trump Administration Is ‘Targeting Pregnant Women’ — For Opposing Birth Tourism

This is precisely why she is derisively called “ Occasional-Cortex.
” There are times when you can read freshman Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ’ s tweets and dismiss them as the unhinged ramblings of a socialist ideologue .
This is not one of those times .
This is flat-out ignorance .
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ( D-NY ) was outraged — outraged , I tell you !
— to learn that the Trump administration is cracking down on birth tourism .
To everyone else that has been paying attention since 2015 , President Trump isn ’ t a fan of “ easy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both illegal border crossing and so-called “ anchor babies ” — children born to women who are not citizens and may have dubious immigration status .
Trending : Man Stabs And Kills His Pro-Trump Boss After Political Dispute Cracking down on issuing visas to pregnant women seems completely consistent with this view .
But not to AOC .
It ’ s a Cause Of Outrage because the administration is clearly targeting vulnerable , pregnant women just to be cruel .
Retweeting an NBC News article about restricting visas to pregnant women , AOC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ administration is now targeting pregnant women .
When you single out the most vulnerable , the cruelty is the point.
” She then added a couple of anti-immigration enforcement hashtags — # Abolish ICE # BreakUpCBP .
No word from AOC if pushing abortion on demand without apology is “ targeting ” unborn babies because “ when you single out the most vulnerable , the cruelty is the point.
” Birthright citizenship is a hotly debated issue in countries that still automatically grant it with no exception .
Both England and Australia have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the status and/or residency of the parent ( England ) or the immigration status/residency of the parent as well as the age and residency of the child ( Australia ) .
A couple of years ago , there was a big hullaballoo in the land up north when it was reported that Chinese nationals were advertising the benefits of Canadian citizenship and promoting birth tourism .
It was also reported that a case moving through the courts was attempting to determine if the children of Russian spies in Canada were to be considered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ larger debate in Canada about possibly curtailing the practice of automatic birthright citizenship .
Just a few weeks ago , the state broadcaster published an article stating that “ birth tourism ” in British Columbia is straining the publicly-funded healthcare system .
And that ’ s Canada , for crying out loud !
The bastion of leftism that knowingly elected a Castro-loving , blackface-wearing , male feminist with a # MeToo past , multiple ethics violations , corruption scandals , and a pitiful legislative record .
The article that AOC tweeted out included @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a lucrative business in both the U.S. and abroad .
American companies take out advertisements and charge up to $ 80,000 to facilitate the practice , offering hotel rooms and medical care .
Many of the women travel from Russia and China to give birth in the U.S .
The U.S. has been cracking down on the practice since before Trump took office .
Although there are scattered cases of authorities arresting operators of birth tourism agencies for visa fraud or tax evasion , coming to the U.S. to give birth is fundamentally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about their intentions when applying for visas and even show signed contracts with doctors and hospitals .
There are no figures on how many foreign women travel to the U.S. specifically to give birth .
The Center for Immigration Studies , a group that advocates for stricter immigration laws , estimated that in 2012 , about 36,000 foreign-born women gave birth in the U.S. , then left the country .
Maybe we should tell AOC that if she is for birth tourism she ’ s supporting capitalists preying on “ vulnerable pregnant women @ @ @ @ @ @ @ give birth in the United States .
She might suddenly find herself against it… but you never can tell with AOC .

This is precisely why she is derisively called “Occasional-Cortex.”
There are times when you can read freshman Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s tweets and dismiss them as the unhinged ramblings of a socialist ideologue. This is not one of those times. This is flat-out ignorance.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez(D-NY) was outraged — outraged, I tell you! — to learn that the Trump administration is cracking down on birth tourism.
To everyone else that has been paying attention since 2015, President Trump isn’t a fan of “easy” U.S. citizenship and has railed against both illegal border crossing and so-called “anchor babies” — children born to women who are not citizens and may have dubious immigration status.
Cracking down on issuing visas to pregnant women seems completely consistent with this view.
But not to AOC. It’s a Cause Of Outrage because the administration is clearly targeting vulnerable, pregnant women just to be cruel.
Retweeting an NBC News article about restricting visas to pregnant women, AOC wrote, “Pregnant women. This administration is now targeting pregnant women. When you single out the most vulnerable, the cruelty is the point.” She then added a couple of anti-immigration enforcement hashtags — #Abolish ICE #BreakUpCBP.
No word from AOC if pushing abortion on demand without apology is “targeting” unborn babies because “when you single out the most vulnerable, the cruelty is the point.”
Pregnant women. This administration is now targeting pregnant. women. When you single out the most vulnerable, the cruelty is the point. #AbolishICE #BreakUpCBP https://t.co/urb9WdOexV — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) January 23, 2020
Birthright citizenship is a hotly debated issue in countries that still automatically grant it with no exception. Both England and Australia have put restrictions on birthright citizenship based on the status and/or residency of the parent (England) or the immigration status/residency of the parent as well as the age and residency of the child (Australia).
A couple of years ago, there was a big hullaballoo in the land up north when it was reported that Chinese nationals were advertising the benefits of Canadian citizenship and promoting birth tourism. It was also reported that a case moving through the courts was attempting to determine if the children of Russian spies in Canada were to be considered Canadian citizens. It sparked a much larger debate in Canada about possibly curtailing the practice of automatic birthright citizenship. Just a few weeks ago, the state broadcaster published an article stating that “birth tourism” in British Columbia is straining the publicly-funded healthcare system.
And that’s Canada, for crying out loud! The bastion of leftism that knowingly elected a Castro-loving, blackface-wearing, male feminist with a #MeToo past, multiple ethics violations, corruption scandals, and a pitiful legislative record.
The article that AOC tweeted out included the following tidbit:
Birth tourism is a lucrative business in both the U.S. and abroad. American companies take out advertisements and charge up to $80,000 to facilitate the practice, offering hotel rooms and medical care. Many of the women travel from Russia and China to give birth in the U.S. The U.S. has been cracking down on the practice since before Trump took office. Although there are scattered cases of authorities arresting operators of birth tourism agencies for visa fraud or tax evasion, coming to the U.S. to give birth is fundamentally legal. And women are often honest about their intentions when applying for visas and even show signed contracts with doctors and hospitals. There are no figures on how many foreign women travel to the U.S. specifically to give birth. The Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for stricter immigration laws, estimated that in 2012, about 36,000 foreign-born women gave birth in the U.S., then left the country. Source: NBC News
Maybe we should tell AOC that if she is for birth tourism she’s supporting capitalists preying on “vulnerable pregnant women” to charge them exorbitant fees to give birth in the United States. She might suddenly find herself against it… but you never can tell with AOC.


clashdaily--2020-01-23--‘Wax My Balls’ Activist Arrested And Charged For Assaulting A Reporter

It looks like the law might not be on the side of the transgender activist with a litigious streak .
Jessica ( Jonathan ) Yaniv , the male-to-female transgender activist who made headlines around the world for filing human rights lawsuits against ( mostly ) immigrant women for refusing to wax male genitalia is in the news one more time .
Just over a week ago , Yaniv was back in court relating to an incident where Yaniv brandished a restricted weapon — a taser , which is illegal to own in Canada — on a YouTube livestream chat with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Outside the Surrey , British Columbia courthouse , Rebel News reporter , Keean Bexte , confronted Yaniv and was chased and attacked with Yaniv physically assaulting Bexte while being recorded .
Bexte filed a lawsuit against Yaniv who has physically attacked reporters in the past .
Trending : Man Stabs And Kills His Pro-Trump Boss After Political Dispute There were unconfirmed reports that Yaniv had been arrested over the weekend , but Bexte confirmed the arrest on Wednesday .
In a statement to The Post Millennial , Bexte said , “ Yaniv has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me , both directly and indirectly .
I can ’ t wait for the day when Yaniv is put away for the long haul .
He is dangerous and unpredictable.
” But that ’ s not all that Yaniv is in the news for .
Amy Eileen Hamm , a reporter from The Post Millennial , may pursue legal action against Yaniv for defamation for claiming that Hamm sexually assaulted Yaniv in the bathroom prompting Yaniv to contact a rape crisis center .
Hamm has retained an attorney who sent Yaniv a strongly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ came on the same day as that physical assault by Yaniv on Bexte .
Since becoming “ internet famous ” some of Yaniv ’ s more disturbing behavior has been exposed .
The creepy online behavior targeting teenage girls , the odd selfies in women ’ s public bathrooms , and the singularly disturbing topless “ all gender ” swim with no parents allowed .
Yaniv had filed 16 complaints against women in the first round of Human Rights complaints hearings , many of whom were visible minorities and entrepreneurs .
Yaniv only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawyer or paid a “ fee ” to Yaniv to drop the complaint .
The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal ruled against Yaniv in October for the frivolous complaints and ordered Yaniv to pay $ 2,000 to each of the women against which complaints had been filed .
Apparently , Yaniv didn ’ t learn anything from that experience .
Yaniv has filed more complaints against women who refuse to wax male genitals .
Human rights complaints were filed by Yaniv around the same time as Yaniv ’ s January 14 court date @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the civil litigations brought by Bexte and Hamm against Yaniv for assault and defamation respectively can proceed .
According to Bexte , Yaniv would be court-ordered to appear for the civil litigations as planned .
Yaniv was released back into the community after the arrest and will appear in court in February .
She will also appear in court in February for two prohibited weapons charges .
Yaniv could face up to 5 years in prison if found guilty of the assault on Bexte .
The question is — which prison would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Who ’ s Back : ‘ Wax My Balls ’ Activist Punches Out Reporter ( Video ) • BOOM : Judge Gives Wax My B*lls Activist Some BAD News • Male To Female Transgender Activist Demands Ladies Wax Male Genitals — Cries ‘ Discrimination ’ When They Refuse

It looks like the law might not be on the side of the transgender activist with a litigious streak.
Jessica (Jonathan) Yaniv, the male-to-female transgender activist who made headlines around the world for filing human rights lawsuits against (mostly) immigrant women for refusing to wax male genitalia is in the news one more time.
Just over a week ago, Yaniv was back in court relating to an incident where Yaniv brandished a restricted weapon — a taser, which is illegal to own in Canada — on a YouTube livestream chat with conservative transgender activist, Blair White. Outside the Surrey, British Columbia courthouse, Rebel News reporter, Keean Bexte, confronted Yaniv and was chased and attacked with Yaniv physically assaulting Bexte while being recorded. Bexte filed a lawsuit against Yaniv who has physically attacked reporters in the past.
J. Yaniv just punched me in the back of the head. Just spoke to police. Luckily there are two security cameras directly overhead at the courthouse. I need an advil. pic.twitter.com/3hfm2CfYhq — Keean Bexte ???? (@TheRealKeean) January 14, 2020
There were unconfirmed reports that Yaniv had been arrested over the weekend, but Bexte confirmed the arrest on Wednesday.
In a statement to The Post Millennial, Bexte said, “Yaniv has been ordered to cease all contact with me, both directly and indirectly. I can’t wait for the day when Yaniv is put away for the long haul. He is dangerous and unpredictable.”
But that’s not all that Yaniv is in the news for. Amy Eileen Hamm, a reporter from The Post Millennial, may pursue legal action against Yaniv for defamation for claiming that Hamm sexually assaulted Yaniv in the bathroom prompting Yaniv to contact a rape crisis center. Hamm has retained an attorney who sent Yaniv a strongly worded letter. This alleged sexual assault came on the same day as that physical assault by Yaniv on Bexte.
Thanks to all who contributed to the legal fund to sue JY. — Amy Eileen Hamm (@preta_6) January 23, 2020
Since becoming “internet famous” some of Yaniv’s more disturbing behavior has been exposed. The creepy online behavior targeting teenage girls, the odd selfies in women’s public bathrooms, and the singularly disturbing topless “all gender” swim with no parents allowed.
Yaniv had filed 16 complaints against women in the first round of Human Rights complaints hearings, many of whom were visible minorities and entrepreneurs. Yaniv only dropping them when the woman hired a lawyer or paid a “fee” to Yaniv to drop the complaint. The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal ruled against Yaniv in October for the frivolous complaints and ordered Yaniv to pay $2,000 to each of the women against which complaints had been filed.
Apparently, Yaniv didn’t learn anything from that experience. Yaniv has filed more complaints against women who refuse to wax male genitals. Human rights complaints were filed by Yaniv around the same time as Yaniv’s January 14 court date.
Even if Yaniv is behind bars, the civil litigations brought by Bexte and Hamm against Yaniv for assault and defamation respectively can proceed. According to Bexte, Yaniv would be court-ordered to appear for the civil litigations as planned. Yaniv was released back into the community after the arrest and will appear in court in February. She will also appear in court in February for two prohibited weapons charges. Source: The Post Millennial
Yaniv could face up to 5 years in prison if found guilty of the assault on Bexte. The question is — which prison would Yaniv be put in?
Related:


clashdaily--2020-01-23--#WINNING: Trump Will Be The First President To Attend The March For Life

Does this mean that the principled Evangelical Never-Trump peeps will cast their ballot for Trump in November ?
He ’ s been the most pro-life President in American history .
He has slowly made it clear that he supports the March For Life .
In 2017 , shortly after his inauguration , Vice President Mike Pence and Presidential Advisor Kellyanne Conway attended the March .
At the time , V.P .
Pence was the highest-ranking public official to address the March .
In 2018 President Trump addressed the Marchers via video , committing to veto any bill that would weaken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2019 Vice President Pence and his wife , Karen , attended the March along with a video address by the President .
The administration touted its positive steps to protect life by ending the Mexico City policy which would allow taxpayer money to fund abortions in foreign countries and nominating conservative judges to federal benches .
In addition , President Trump has followed the lead of other Republican Presidents beginning with Ronald Reagan declaring the anniversary of Roe v Wade , January 22 , National Sanctity of Human Life Day .
Every year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the pro-life cause .
Trending : Man Stabs And Kills His Pro-Trump Boss After Political Dispute Three years have led up to this moment — the sitting President will attend the March For Life and address the crowd .
The President of March For Life , Jeanne Mancini , made the announcement : We are deeply honored to welcome President Trump to the 47th annual March for Life .
He will be the first president in history to attend and we are so excited for him to experience in person how passionate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the unborn .
From the appointment of pro-life judges and federal workers , to cutting taxpayer funding for abortions here and abroad , to calling for an end to late-term abortions , President Trump and his Administration have been consistent champions for life and their support for the March for Life has been unwavering .
We are grateful for all these pro-life accomplishments and look forward to gaining more victories for life in the future .
This is YUGE .
In 46 years , no other President has attended the March For Life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Prepare yourself for the inevitable leftist outrage , because you know it ’ s coming .
Many pro-life activists consider President Trump the most pro-life President in history .
He has clearly given the pro-life cause a great deal of attention in both his domestic and foreign policies .
President Trump has been the unlikely champion of the pro-life movement , and it ’ s incredible .
Way to go , Mr. President !

Does this mean that the principled Evangelical Never-Trump peeps will cast their ballot for Trump in November?
He’s been the most pro-life President in American history. He has slowly made it clear that he supports the March For Life. In 2017, shortly after his inauguration, Vice President Mike Pence and Presidential Advisor Kellyanne Conway attended the March. At the time, V.P. Pence was the highest-ranking public official to address the March. In 2018 President Trump addressed the Marchers via video, committing to veto any bill that would weaken the protection of human life. In 2019 Vice President Pence and his wife, Karen, attended the March along with a video address by the President. The administration touted its positive steps to protect life by ending the Mexico City policy which would allow taxpayer money to fund abortions in foreign countries and nominating conservative judges to federal benches.
In addition, President Trump has followed the lead of other Republican Presidents beginning with Ronald Reagan declaring the anniversary of Roe v Wade, January 22, National Sanctity of Human Life Day.
Every year the Trump administration has reaffirmed its commitment to the pro-life cause.
Three years have led up to this moment — the sitting President will attend the March For Life and address the crowd.
The President of March For Life, Jeanne Mancini, made the announcement:
We are deeply honored to welcome President Trump to the 47th annual March for Life. He will be the first president in history to attend and we are so excited for him to experience in person how passionate our marchers are about life and protecting the unborn. From the appointment of pro-life judges and federal workers, to cutting taxpayer funding for abortions here and abroad, to calling for an end to late-term abortions, President Trump and his Administration have been consistent champions for life and their support for the March for Life has been unwavering. We are grateful for all these pro-life accomplishments and look forward to gaining more victories for life in the future.
This is YUGE. In 46 years, no other President has attended the March For Life.
The March for Life is honored to announce @realDonaldTrump will be the first U.S. President to speak at the March for Life Rally. Thank you, President Trump, for being a voice for the unborn and continuously working to build a culture of life. https://t.co/lojZssLeim — March for Life (@March_for_Life) January 22, 2020
President Trump tweeted about it himself:
See you on Friday…Big Crowd! https://t.co/MFyWLG4HFZ — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 22, 2020
Prepare yourself for the inevitable leftist outrage, because you know it’s coming.
Many pro-life activists consider President Trump the most pro-life President in history. He has clearly given the pro-life cause a great deal of attention in both his domestic and foreign policies.
President Trump has been the unlikely champion of the pro-life movement, and it’s incredible.
Way to go, Mr. President!


clashdaily--2020-01-23--Is The Church Driving Men Away?

Is The Church Driving Men Away?

The church wasn ’ t always filled with thumb-sucking pajama-boys .
We were once lead by bold men of courage who would rather be devoured by lions than back down from the gospel .
Something ’ s changed along the way… and it ’ s not for the better .
If you ’ ve ever looked around on a Sunday morning and began to wonder if you ’ d taken a wrong turn and accidentally stepped onto the set of a feminine hygiene commercial , then you know what we ’ re talking about .
Whatever happened to the moxy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fearless in the beginning ?
Trending : Man Stabs And Kills His Pro-Trump Boss After Political Dispute These two minutes of spiritual adrenalin tackle that issue head-on .
Are you up for it ?
Are you SURE ?
Did you love that ?
You bet you did !
There ’ s lots more where that came from .
Check out ClashRadio.com for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg .
Also , don ’ t miss out on this : Pussification : The Effeminization Of The American Male Doug Giles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog , ClashDaily.com , has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity .
That is , if the man-child will put down his frappuccino ; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome .
Buy Now : Pussification : The Effeminization Of The American Male

The church wasn’t always filled with thumb-sucking pajama-boys. We were once lead by bold men of courage who would rather be devoured by lions than back down from the gospel.
Something’s changed along the way… and it’s not for the better.
If you’ve ever looked around on a Sunday morning and began to wonder if you’d taken a wrong turn and accidentally stepped onto the set of a feminine hygiene commercial, then you know what we’re talking about.
Whatever happened to the moxy that made the Church so strong and fearless in the beginning?
These two minutes of spiritual adrenalin tackle that issue head-on. Are you up for it?
Are you SURE?
Did you love that? You bet you did!
There’s lots more where that came from.
Check out ClashRadio.com for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg.
Also, don’t miss out on this:
Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now: Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male


clashdaily--2020-01-23--Denver Post Writer Fired For Blasting The AP Stylebook As ‘Activism’ Pushing Progressivism

One conservative columnist wrote that the AP stylebook was ensuring that progressive values are pushed forward and journalists are ignorant of tipping the scales in the culture war .
John Caldera is the president of Libertarian Independence Institute , and until recently wrote for the Denver Post .
After he penned a piece condemning the AP Style Guide denying the gender binary — that there are only two sexes indicated by either XX or XY chromosomes — he was let go .
Caldera ’ s article was larger than that , though .
His assertion that the updated AP Stylebook @ @ @ @ @ @ @ handbook to keep reporting consistent , but instead “ codifies reporters ’ progressively loaded language ” and therefore determines which ideas are the acceptable ones .
He says that the press doesn ’ t seem to understand how the average American perceives them because they can not see how “ monolithically progressive ” the mainstream media is , nor do they recognize that they are actively pushing a progressive agenda simply by following the AP Stylebook .
He cites the example of the immigration debate where the AP says that calling those who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illegal aliens ” is no longer acceptable .
The word “ illegal ” should be used to describe an action , not a person , it says , so instead use the word “ undocumented.
” This clearly picks a winner in the immigration debate .
Trending : Man Stabs And Kills His Pro-Trump Boss After Political Dispute Caldera tells readers that the “ first rule in winning any political battle is winning the language used to define the issue ” and when it comes to that , the media “ plays judge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the built-up frustration to the main-stream media carried Trump to victory .
It ’ s more fascinating that the media has shown absolutely no introspection into their role in the phenomenon .
They really think most Americans see them as they see themselves — brave warriors of truth , not torchbearers for progressive ideology .
One only has to listen to NPR reporters and their pee-your-pants excitement at covering Trump ’ s impeachment to conclude they still have no idea so much of America considers them the enemy .
Caldera was pushing back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new insistence that gender is not a binary .
It reads , “ Not all people fall under one of two categories for sex and gender ” and accepts the pronoun “ they ” as singular or a gender-neutral pronoun .
He says that it ’ s commendable that the Associated Press ( and reporters at large ) want to be compassionate to transgender individuals , but AP reporters “ first have a duty to the truth ” and denying the gender binary as indicated by the XX or XY chromosomes is simply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rampant political correctness surrounding “ Race-related coverage.
” Caldera explains that although most definitions in the Stylebook take a phrase or short sentence to explain , the explanation of racial coverage “ takes more than four pages to bob-and-weave through political correctness .
No wonder the country can ’ t have a coherent conversation about race .
We ’ re not allowed to use words.
” He concludes his article with a scathing final thought , “ The AP is the conduit for propaganda .
If they don ’ t own up to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they may help re-elect the president they loathe.
” “ My column is not a soft voiced , sticky sweet NPR-styled piece which employs the language now mandated by the victim-centric , identity politics driven media , ” he said in a Facebook post.
“ What seemed to be the last straw for my column was my insistence that there are only two sexes and my frustration that to be inclusive of the transgendered ( even that word isn ’ t allowed ) we must lose our right to free speech.
” Caldara @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sex and gender are not binary .
“ There are only two sexes , identified by an XX or XY chromosome .
That is the very definition of binary .
The AP ruling it isn ’ t so doesn ’ t change science .
It ’ s a premeditative attempt to change culture and policy .
It ’ s activism , ” he wrote on Jan. 3 .
In a column two weeks later , Caldara also railed against a 2019 Colorado law that required elementary school children to be instructed in transgender @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t thrilled a couple of years back when during school their little ones in Boulder Valley School District were treated to videos staring [ sic ] a transgender teddy bear teaching the kids how to misuse pronouns or when Colorado ’ s ‘ Trans Community Choir ’ sang to kids about a transgender raven , ” Caldara wrote .
“ What are the protections for a parent who feels transgender singing groups and teddy bears with gender dysphoria might be ‘ stigmatizing ’ for their kid ?
” In an interview with Westword @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me I was the page ’ s most-read columnist .
But there ’ s now a permanently and perpetually offended class , and in order to speak , you need to use their terminology .
There ’ s a whole lot of you-can ’ t-say-that-ism going on right now.
” Caldera was fired for being honest and sharing his opinion and daring to say the things that aren ’ t said .
That used to be the role of the media .
By giving him his pink slip , the Denver Post just @ @ @ @ @ @ @

One conservative columnist wrote that the AP stylebook was ensuring that progressive values are pushed forward and journalists are ignorant of tipping the scales in the culture war.
John Caldera is the president of Libertarian Independence Institute, and until recently wrote for the Denver Post. After he penned a piece condemning the AP Style Guide denying the gender binary — that there are only two sexes indicated by either XX or XY chromosomes — he was let go.
Caldera’s article was larger than that, though. His assertion that the updated AP Stylebook, which is supposed to be a handbook to keep reporting consistent, but instead “codifies reporters’ progressively loaded language” and therefore determines which ideas are the acceptable ones.
He says that the press doesn’t seem to understand how the average American perceives them because they cannot see how “monolithically progressive” the mainstream media is, nor do they recognize that they are actively pushing a progressive agenda simply by following the AP Stylebook. He cites the example of the immigration debate where the AP says that calling those who cross the border without proper documentation “illegal aliens” is no longer acceptable. The word “illegal” should be used to describe an action, not a person, it says, so instead use the word “undocumented.” This clearly picks a winner in the immigration debate.
Caldera tells readers that the “first rule in winning any political battle is winning the language used to define the issue” and when it comes to that, the media “plays judge and jury.”
He writes:
It is fascinating how the built-up frustration to the main-stream media carried Trump to victory. It’s more fascinating that the media has shown absolutely no introspection into their role in the phenomenon. They really think most Americans see them as they see themselves — brave warriors of truth, not torchbearers for progressive ideology. One only has to listen to NPR reporters and their pee-your-pants excitement at covering Trump’s impeachment to conclude they still have no idea so much of America considers them the enemy. Source: Denver Post
Caldera was pushing back against the updated AP Styleguide’s new insistence that gender is not a binary. It reads, “Not all people fall under one of two categories for sex and gender” and accepts the pronoun “they” as singular or a gender-neutral pronoun. He says that it’s commendable that the Associated Press (and reporters at large) want to be compassionate to transgender individuals, but AP reporters “first have a duty to the truth” and denying the gender binary as indicated by the XX or XY chromosomes is simply activism.
He also wrote about the rampant political correctness surrounding “Race-related coverage.” Caldera explains that although most definitions in the Stylebook take a phrase or short sentence to explain, the explanation of racial coverage “takes more than four pages to bob-and-weave through political correctness. No wonder the country can’t have a coherent conversation about race. We’re not allowed to use words.”
He concludes his article with a scathing final thought, “The AP is the conduit for propaganda. If they don’t own up to it and try to change it, they may help re-elect the president they loathe.”
“My column is not a soft voiced, sticky sweet NPR-styled piece which employs the language now mandated by the victim-centric, identity politics driven media,” he said in a Facebook post.“What seemed to be the last straw for my column was my insistence that there are only two sexes and my frustration that to be inclusive of the transgendered (even that word isn’t allowed) we must lose our right to free speech.” Caldara criticized an Associated Press directive saying that sex and gender are not binary. “There are only two sexes, identified by an XX or XY chromosome. That is the very definition of binary. The AP ruling it isn’t so doesn’t change science. It’s a premeditative attempt to change culture and policy. It’s activism,” he wrote on Jan. 3. In a column two weeks later, Caldara also railed against a 2019 Colorado law that required elementary school children to be instructed in transgender ideology. “Some parents weren’t thrilled a couple of years back when during school their little ones in Boulder Valley School District were treated to videos staring [sic] a transgender teddy bear teaching the kids how to misuse pronouns or when Colorado’s ‘Trans Community Choir’ sang to kids about a transgender raven,” Caldara wrote. “What are the protections for a parent who feels transgender singing groups and teddy bears with gender dysphoria might be ‘stigmatizing’ for their kid?” Source: Washington Free Beacon
In an interview with Westword, Caldera said, “Megan told me I was the page’s most-read columnist. But there’s now a permanently and perpetually offended class, and in order to speak, you need to use their terminology. There’s a whole lot of you-can’t-say-that-ism going on right now.”
Caldera was fired for being honest and sharing his opinion and daring to say the things that aren’t said. That used to be the role of the media.
By giving him his pink slip, the Denver Post just proved that he’s right.


clashdaily--2020-01-23--Ted Cruz On Impeachment, Hunter Biden And How The Senate Can Legally COMPEL Testimony (Video)

Ted Cruz and Michael Knowles are giving us the inside baseball on what ’ s going on in the Senate hearings , what went right or wrong , and what ’ s coming next .
In the new after-hours special series ‘ The Verdict ’ , being recorded IMMEDIATELY after hearings conclude each day , Cruz and Knowles kicked over some interesting rocks , revealing possible outcomes the Press has NOT been talking about .
They also talk about what they think is the Schiff Show ’ s first major blunder .
( Well , aside from the impeachment itself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cruz begins describing their strategic blunder .
Trending : Man Stabs And Kills His Pro-Trump Boss After Political Dispute The Democrats brought up Biden and Burisma .
They asserted their spin that it was all bogus , but THEY introduced that topic into the conversation , basing his whole case on his claim that the investigations into Biden are a sham .
That ’ s an allegation .
Allegations get tested .
How would the President ’ s defense team test whether allegations against Biden are truly a ‘ sham ’ ?
By @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden and Burisma WERE corrupt — or more specifically , if Trump had any justifiable concern that this was the case — then Trump was entirely justified by inquiring into it .
And we can all go home .
First , they reminded listeners that the same Adam Schiff who now claims that not allowing the defendant to put forward evidence is proof of an unfair trial just presided over the Kangaroo court we all saw play out in the House late last year .
17 witnesses were called AGAINST Trump and zero @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s choosing could stand in his defense .
If Trump ’ s lawyers want to call Hunter Biden in their defense , there is nothing stopping them from doing so if they get 51 votes in support .
What happens if Hunter dosn ’ t want to testify , or if he refuses to answer questions , or pleads the fifth ?
That ’ s where the conversation gets interesting .
There ’ s a federal statute that gives the Senate authority to grant him what ’ s called ‘ transactional immunity ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him to testify , under the expectation that he can not be prosecuted for anything he divulges .
He is saying that witnesses can be forced to testify or be put in jail .
And naturally , if Biden did not cooperate , and still plead the fifth , he would be in legal jeopardy if we discover any criminal wrongdoing in which he HAS been involved .

Ted Cruz and Michael Knowles are giving us the inside baseball on what’s going on in the Senate hearings, what went right or wrong, and what’s coming next.
In the new after-hours special series ‘The Verdict’, being recorded IMMEDIATELY after hearings conclude each day, Cruz and Knowles kicked over some interesting rocks, revealing possible outcomes the Press has NOT been talking about.
They also talk about what they think is the Schiff Show’s first major blunder. (Well, aside from the impeachment itself.)
At about the 13:35 mark Cruz begins describing their strategic blunder.
The Democrats brought up Biden and Burisma. They asserted their spin that it was all bogus, but THEY introduced that topic into the conversation, basing his whole case on his claim that the investigations into Biden are a sham.
That’s an allegation. Allegations get tested. How would the President’s defense team test whether allegations against Biden are truly a ‘sham’? By testing those claims of corruption. If Biden and Burisma WERE corrupt — or more specifically, if Trump had any justifiable concern that this was the case — then Trump was entirely justified by inquiring into it.
And we can all go home.
Oops.
Naturally, the conversation turned toward Biden testifying.
First, they reminded listeners that the same Adam Schiff who now claims that not allowing the defendant to put forward evidence is proof of an unfair trial just presided over the Kangaroo court we all saw play out in the House late last year. 17 witnesses were called AGAINST Trump and zero … ZERO … witnesses of Trump’s choosing could stand in his defense.
If Trump’s lawyers want to call Hunter Biden in their defense, there is nothing stopping them from doing so if they get 51 votes in support.
What happens if Hunter dosn’t want to testify, or if he refuses to answer questions, or pleads the fifth?
That’s where the conversation gets interesting.
(At about the 20 minute mark)
There’s a federal statute that gives the Senate authority to grant him what’s called ‘transactional immunity’. It means the Senate can FORCE him to testify, under the expectation that he cannot be prosecuted for anything he divulges.
He is saying that witnesses can be forced to testify or be put in jail.
And naturally, if Biden did not cooperate, and still plead the fifth, he would be in legal jeopardy if we discover any criminal wrongdoing in which he HAS been involved.


clashdaily--2020-01-23--WATCH: Why Are These Cray-Cray Feminists Singing A Song About Their Naughty Bits?

And dare we ask what , in this context , they mean by there ’ s a ‘ party in my p*ssy ’ ?
We ’ re pretty sure you ’ re doing it wrong .
This weird ritual is almost as bizarro-world as that time Democrats had themselves an organized ‘ scream at the sky ’ party over the ‘ tragedy ’ of Trump being their President .
You ’ ve got a bunch of women gathered in some kind of a weird Kumbaya circle with some chick ( wearing clothes , fortunately ) laying down in the center @ @ @ @ @ @ @ His Pro-Trump Boss After Political Dispute Not a particularly DIVERSE group of liberals , is it ?
All of them are almost certainly liberal , obviously .
Who else would be caught dead in this particular brand of singing exercise ?
But oddly enough , they are also mostly — if not entirely — middle-aged white chicks .
We have no accounting for why that is .
Is there something about middle-aged white liberal chicks that makes them unusually susceptible to weird rituals like this one ?
Or is this just the next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a word ) of our political lives ?
The political extending into , and subsuming the role of both religion and philosophy in the lives of liberals ?
It ’ s hardly the first time we ’ ve seen something like this .
Remember that time some women got together to lift their skirts and ‘ yell at Trump through their Vaginas ‘ ?
What , did ALL of these chicks flunk out of Health Class ?
Do they know the difference between their mouth and their ‘ ladyparts ’ ?
News flash @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t actually speak any more than your elbow or your bellybutton .
We ’ re not exactly talking Rocket Science , here .
Liberal Women Gather To Yell At Trump Via Their Vajayjay – No , This Isn ’ t Satire CATE BLANCHETT : ‘ My MORAL Compass Is In My Vagina ’ Liberalism Is A Disease : VAGINA MONOLOGUES Gets Cancelled At College – The ‘ Reason ’ Is Funny AF Dear America : Liberals Say , ‘ Vagina ’ Is No Longer A ‘ Gender Inclusive Term ’ – So Call @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : TransActivists Threaten To Kill Women – So Much For Tolerance , Eh ?

And dare we ask what, in this context, they mean by there’s a ‘party in my p*ssy’? We’re pretty sure you’re doing it wrong.
This weird ritual is almost as bizarro-world as that time Democrats had themselves an organized ‘scream at the sky’ party over the ‘tragedy’ of Trump being their President.
You’ve got a bunch of women gathered in some kind of a weird Kumbaya circle with some chick (wearing clothes, fortunately) laying down in the center.
These people are sick. pic.twitter.com/YVcFNdiEVx — Rep. Steven Smith ?? (@RepStevenSmith) January 23, 2020
Not a particularly DIVERSE group of liberals, is it?
All of them are almost certainly liberal, obviously. Who else would be caught dead in this particular brand of singing exercise?
But oddly enough, they are also mostly — if not entirely — middle-aged white chicks. We have no accounting for why that is.
Is there something about middle-aged white liberal chicks that makes them unusually susceptible to weird rituals like this one?
Or is this just the next phase of the religion-ifying (to invent a word) of our political lives? The political extending into, and subsuming the role of both religion and philosophy in the lives of liberals?
It’s hardly the first time we’ve seen something like this.
Remember that time some women got together to lift their skirts and ‘yell at Trump through their Vaginas‘?
What, did ALL of these chicks flunk out of Health Class? Do they know the difference between their mouth and their ‘ladyparts’?
News flash: the one without teeth can’t actually speak any more than your elbow or your bellybutton.
We’re not exactly talking Rocket Science, here.
Liberal Women Gather To Yell At Trump Via Their Vajayjay – No, This Isn’t Satire
Other Related Stories…
CATE BLANCHETT: ‘My MORAL Compass Is In My Vagina’
Liberalism Is A Disease: VAGINA MONOLOGUES Gets Cancelled At College – The ‘Reason’ Is Funny AF
Dear America: Liberals Say, ‘Vagina’ Is No Longer A ‘Gender Inclusive Term’ – So Call It ‘Front Hole’ Instead
KUMBAYAH: TransActivists Threaten To Kill Women – So Much For Tolerance, Eh?
And a voice of sanity…
VIRAL: ‘Activist Mommy’ DESTROYS Liberal ‘Nasty Women’ In 3 LMAO Minutes


clashdaily--2020-01-23--Remember When 3 Dem Senators Did PRECISELY What Schiff Accused Trump Of Doing?

If they vote to convict and remove the President , we must demand three Senators ’ resignations the very same day .
Supposing this whole impeachment circus was NOT just a cynical ploy by the Democrats to smear the President , to drive wedges in the party , and to hurt the reelection chances of Republican senators in Blue States .
Supposing we could all suspend disbelief long enough to pretend this was all being done for the purest and most honorable of motives , what is being alleged ?
Well , everything hinges on that phone call , right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ His Pro-Trump Boss After Political Dispute The core of their argument is that our security interests and Ukraine ’ s security interests are intertwined .
If Ukraine is weakened , Russia is strengthened , and that hurts American interests .
Ukranian lives were ( at least hypothetically ) lost and endangered .
And for what.. ?
So that one political party could get dirt on the leadership of their rival .
Threatening the national security of foreign governments by withholding much-needed defense aid unless they help you to dirty up your political opponent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ corruption we have ever seen in impeachment cases , because it is the most cynical kind of partisanship for personal , rather than national gain .
Sound about right ?
That ’ s basically the line that Schiff has been feeding us , right ?
Let ’ s leave aside , for a moment , Schiff ’ s mystical psychic powers to definitively see into every private motive of every decision Trump has ever made .
Supposing we accept in general terms the idea that pressuring vulnerable foreign allies by withholding much-needed defense @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up their territory is a bad thing .
And let us suppose that is made orders of magnitude worse if it is done to ‘ get dirt on ’ a political opponent .
Can Senate Democrats really point an angry finger at TRUMP with a straight face ?
Have they forgotten what their own members did in 2018 ?
They sent a letter to Ukraine , specifically raising the issue of their non-cooperation with the Mueller Report .
The letter also appears to dangle U.S. support for Ukraine as a reason for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , stating , “ In four short years , Ukraine has made significant progress in building [ democratic ] institutions despite ongoing military , economic and political pressure from Moscow .
We have supported that capacity-building process and are disappointed that some in Kyiv appear to have cast aside these principles.
” Meanwhile , Democratic Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy delivered a similar message to Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky earlier this month , warning that Democratic support for the country could dwindle if he complied with the president ’ s requests to investigate former @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DailyCaller According to the ‘ new rules ’ we have been shown through these proceedings , a threat need not spoken openly and explicitly for it to be ‘ understood ’ as such and full compliance demanded… ‘ or else ’ .
If it ’ s perfectly OK for Schiff to ‘ read between the lines ’ and throw around terms like ‘ veiled threats ’ and ‘ for personal political gain ’ when examining Trump ’ s reasons for inquiring about corruption touching on – among other things — a future political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that a party whose entire motto and strategy has become ‘ The Resistance ’ from day one of Trump ’ s Presidency , and who have openly called for his ouster from the day he was elected were operating for precisely the cynical motives Schiff and Senator Schumer are so desperately trying to ascribe to Trump ?
If they cast a vote against Trump for ‘ endangering American security ’ , do they not likewise damn their OWN actions ?
Or should we REALLY believe the motives of Patrick Lehey , Dick Durbin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t convict me ‘ Menendez ?
As a side note , if it ’ s the Democrats ’ claim that Trump can be ‘ forever impeached ’ even if the Senate acquits him , doesn ’ t that cut both ways ?
Doesn ’ t that suggest that the DOJ dismissing charges rather than run a second trial against Menendez , despite ‘ compelling ’ evidence of guilt should likewise mean that HIS vindication means nothing ?
That we are free to assume he IS guilty , and only got off on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kind of America the Democrats want for us ?
One in which guilt is assumed , and innocence must be proven ?
Because that thinking has led many countries down some ugly — and bloody — roads .
And that ’ s the price tag that politics-by-smear comes with .

If they vote to convict and remove the President, we must demand three Senators’ resignations the very same day.
Supposing this whole impeachment circus was NOT just a cynical ploy by the Democrats to smear the President, to drive wedges in the party, and to hurt the reelection chances of Republican senators in Blue States.
Supposing we could all suspend disbelief long enough to pretend this was all being done for the purest and most honorable of motives, what is being alleged?
Well, everything hinges on that phone call, right?
The core of their argument is that our security interests and Ukraine’s security interests are intertwined. If Ukraine is weakened, Russia is strengthened, and that hurts American interests. Ukranian lives were (at least hypothetically) lost and endangered.
And for what..? So that one political party could get dirt on the leadership of their rival. Threatening the national security of foreign governments by withholding much-needed defense aid unless they help you to dirty up your political opponent is the ‘worst’ kind of corruption we have ever seen in impeachment cases, because it is the most cynical kind of partisanship for personal, rather than national gain.
Sound about right? That’s basically the line that Schiff has been feeding us, right?
Let’s leave aside, for a moment, Schiff’s mystical psychic powers to definitively see into every private motive of every decision Trump has ever made. Supposing we accept in general terms the idea that pressuring vulnerable foreign allies by withholding much-needed defense dollars when the Russians are literally gobbling up their territory is a bad thing. And let us suppose that is made orders of magnitude worse if it is done to ‘get dirt on’ a political opponent.
Can Senate Democrats really point an angry finger at TRUMP with a straight face? Have they forgotten what their own members did in 2018?
In May, three Democrat senators wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general urging him to help investigate President Trump. Their letter implied that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake. https://t.co/vJa8RKs8vq — Matt Wolking (Text TRUMP to 88022) (@MattWolking) September 25, 2019
They sent a letter to Ukraine, specifically raising the issue of their non-cooperation with the Mueller Report.
The letter also appears to dangle U.S. support for Ukraine as a reason for the country to continue cooperating with the investigation, stating, “In four short years, Ukraine has made significant progress in building [democratic] institutions despite ongoing military, economic and political pressure from Moscow. We have supported that capacity-building process and are disappointed that some in Kyiv appear to have cast aside these principles.” Meanwhile, Democratic Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy delivered a similar message to Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky earlier this month, warning that Democratic support for the country could dwindle if he complied with the president’s requests to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.
Source: DailyCaller
According to the ‘new rules’ we have been shown through these proceedings, a threat need not spoken openly and explicitly for it to be ‘understood’ as such and full compliance demanded… ‘or else’.
If it’s perfectly OK for Schiff to ‘read between the lines’ and throw around terms like ‘veiled threats’ and ‘for personal political gain’ when examining Trump’s reasons for inquiring about corruption touching on – among other things — a future political rival…
How is it any LESS likely that a party whose entire motto and strategy has become ‘The Resistance’ from day one of Trump’s Presidency, and who have openly called for his ouster from the day he was elected were operating for precisely the cynical motives Schiff and Senator Schumer are so desperately trying to ascribe to Trump?
If they cast a vote against Trump for ‘endangering American security’, do they not likewise damn their OWN actions?
Or should we REALLY believe the motives of Patrick Lehey, Dick Durbin, and Robert ‘The Jury didn’t convict me‘ Menendez?
As a side note, if it’s the Democrats’ claim that Trump can be ‘forever impeached’ even if the Senate acquits him, doesn’t that cut both ways?
Doesn’t that suggest that the DOJ dismissing charges rather than run a second trial against Menendez, despite ‘compelling’ evidence of guilt should likewise mean that HIS vindication means nothing? That we are free to assume he IS guilty, and only got off on a technicality?
Is this REALLY the kind of America the Democrats want for us? One in which guilt is assumed, and innocence must be proven?
Because that thinking has led many countries down some ugly — and bloody — roads.
And that’s the price tag that politics-by-smear comes with.