clashdaily--2020-06-25--True Biblical Greatness vs. Vapid Religious Bulls**t

If even the apostles needed to be straightened out on this point , don ’ t you think we might need to hear the same warning from time to time ?
There is a world of difference between being a Big Shot and being someone that Christ would call ‘ great ’ .
Even the apostles need that explained to them .
That ’ s the text Warriors and Wildmen uses as today ’ s jumping-off point .
The Kingdom of God plays by different rules and different standards than the Ivy League crowd jockeying to make partner in that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about prestige .
It ’ s not about being noticed .
It ’ s about being faithful to the things that really need doing .
Trending : This Painting Of Teddy Roosevelt Will Make Easily Triggered Leftists Weep Is it about having the right attitude to the task ?
Sure , but that ’ s missing the point .
More importantly , it ’ s about having the right attitude to the PEOPLE .
Doug and Rich break share some of their own anecdotes about getting this right and getting this very , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which really puts Biblical Greatness in proper perspective .
Rich ’ s story about what happened in that Biker Bar is gold .
Prefer to stream the video ?
We ’ ve got you covered : Roku — FireTV — AndroidTV ) Don ’ t miss the next one !
Subscribe for the podcast on your favorite platform : Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg .
While you ’ re at it , here ’ s his latest book :

If even the apostles needed to be straightened out on this point, don’t you think we might need to hear the same warning from time to time?
There is a world of difference between being a Big Shot and being someone that Christ would call ‘great’. Even the apostles need that explained to them. That’s the text Warriors and Wildmen uses as today’s jumping-off point.
The Kingdom of God plays by different rules and different standards than the Ivy League crowd jockeying to make partner in that law firm.
It’s not about prestige. It’s not about being noticed. It’s about being faithful to the things that really need doing.
Is it about having the right attitude to the task? Sure, but that’s missing the point. More importantly, it’s about having the right attitude to the PEOPLE.
Doug and Rich break share some of their own anecdotes about getting this right and getting this very, very wrong in today’s show which really puts Biblical Greatness in proper perspective.
Rich’s story about what happened in that Biker Bar is gold.
Prefer to stream the video? We’ve got you covered: Roku — FireTV — AndroidTV)
Don’t miss the next one! Subscribe for the podcast on your favorite platform:
Apple Podcasts
Google Play Music
Spotify
Soundcloud
Stitcher
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg. While you’re at it, here’s his latest book:


clashdaily--2020-06-25--Hey Seattle: Companies Screwed Over By ‘Your Summer Of Love’ Have Lawyered Up… Now What?

Remember how they scolded America , asking why we were ‘ afraid of Democracy ’ ?
Now it ’ s time to pay the piper .
Maybe literally .
You see , in a Democracy , when someone gets screwed over — even if it ’ s by their own government — the courts are a viable course of action .
And in the process of having downtown becoming a no-go zone for anyone NOT participating in the lawless takeover of Seattle ’ s core , plenty of people paid a price .
In particular , the local businesses have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re not taking this laying down .
Trending : This Painting Of Teddy Roosevelt Will Make Easily Triggered Leftists Weep They ’ ve gotten themselves lawyers and they are taking action against the city for the price they had to pay for city officials turning a blind eye to this lawlessness .
If you thought Seattle ’ s budget blown half to hell over COVID and the protests , just wait until you see what happens when the lawsuits finally get resolved .
Elections have consequences , we are told .
The consequences @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and mental midgets in charge will have some serious ones .
Keep that in mind next time you all head out to the polls , would you ?
And don ’ t expect America to bail you out for your little experiment in Anarchy .
Each State has a certain degree of sovereignty… and with that comes the expectation that you will clean up your own mess when those ideas blow up in your faces .

Remember how they scolded America, asking why we were ‘afraid of Democracy’? Now it’s time to pay the piper. Maybe literally.
You see, in a Democracy, when someone gets screwed over — even if it’s by their own government — the courts are a viable course of action.
And in the process of having downtown becoming a no-go zone for anyone NOT participating in the lawless takeover of Seattle’s core, plenty of people paid a price. In particular, the local businesses have paid a price.
And they’re not taking this laying down.
They’ve gotten themselves lawyers and they are taking action against the city for the price they had to pay for city officials turning a blind eye to this lawlessness.
DEVELOPING: More than a dozen businesses inside CHOP zone, on Seattle's Capitol Hill, file 56-page class action lawsuit against the City of Seattle. They're seeking unspecified damages, to be determined at trial. pic.twitter.com/RPlsW3DuNv — Preston Phillips (@PrestonTVNews) June 25, 2020
If you thought Seattle’s budget blown half to hell over COVID and the protests, just wait until you see what happens when the lawsuits finally get resolved.
Elections have consequences, we are told. The consequences of Seattle putting a gaggle of ideologues and mental midgets in charge will have some serious ones.
Keep that in mind next time you all head out to the polls, would you?
And don’t expect America to bail you out for your little experiment in Anarchy. Each State has a certain degree of sovereignty… and with that comes the expectation that you will clean up your own mess when those ideas blow up in your faces.


clashdaily--2020-06-25--Leftist Protester Blasts Black Cop, He Sets Her Straight Without Breaking A Sweat (Video)

Where are all these scream-y self-righteous white chicks coming from , and why are they so quick to pick fights with black cops ?
Another day , another shrill drill that cops with the patience of Job have to suffer through .
This time , a white chick blasts a cop as racist .
The fact that his wife is black and their kids are mixed is no defense against her accusation that he ’ s racist .
She ’ s operating at top-tier smug and self-righteous , and she starts goading a black cop .
He ’ s not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flips the script on her , says some things she might never have heard before .
As a black cop , he was in a position to challenge her assumptions about racism .
But he went further than that .
It ’ s exactly the kind of thing she NEEDED to hear too .
It included some reality checks , and some insights about human nature that looks deeper than retread political talking points and finger-pointing .
One that actually points to a possible solution to the stalemate we find ourselves in .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ retribution .
Some will chafe at it , but kudos to this cop for handling this situation the way he did .
If you liked that , you ’ ll LOVE this : Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg .
While you ’ re at it , here ’ s his latest book :

Where are all these scream-y self-righteous white chicks coming from, and why are they so quick to pick fights with black cops?
Another day, another shrill drill that cops with the patience of Job have to suffer through.
This time, a white chick blasts a cop as racist. The fact that his wife is black and their kids are mixed is no defense against her accusation that he’s racist.
She’s operating at top-tier smug and self-righteous, and she starts goading a black cop. He’s not interested in playing her game and he flips the script on her, says some things she might never have heard before.
As a black cop, he was in a position to challenge her assumptions about racism. But he went further than that. It’s exactly the kind of thing she NEEDED to hear too.
It included some reality checks, and some insights about human nature that looks deeper than retread political talking points and finger-pointing. One that actually points to a possible solution to the stalemate we find ourselves in.
One that focuses on redemption and not retribution.
Some will chafe at it, but kudos to this cop for handling this situation the way he did.
If you liked that, you’ll LOVE this:
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg. While you’re at it, here’s his latest book:


clashdaily--2020-06-25--VINDICATED? Gen Flynn Calls In To Rush Limbaugh’s Show After Favorable Ruling

General Flynn has had a long , hard fight .
Now a court has finally ruled in his favor .
That doesn ’ t mean the fight is over .
The judge who stood in his way has some more devious tricks to play .
The nightmare is not yet over .
A cynic might almost believe the judge was deliberately running out the clock until after November… for some reason .
It was looking like a vindication when the Appeals court ordered Judge Sullivan to dismiss Flynn ’ s case .
( That ’ s where things were standing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s program . )
But the slippery judge hasn ’ t yet run out of cards to play to take Flynn through the wringer .
Trending : This Painting Of Teddy Roosevelt Will Make Easily Triggered Leftists Weep While we all wait so see what will happen when that finally plays out , here is the transcript of the optimism we saw in his call with El Rushbo .
RUSH : I ’ m told that we have General Flynn on the phone .
Michael Flynn , you are here on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FLYNN : How about that , Rush ?
Yeah , this is Mike Flynn .
How you doing ?
FLYNN : Well , I want to just tell you , first of all , you got a lot of prayers coming from the Flynn family for you and all the things that you ’ re going through , so just know that .
And I just want to say from the bottom of our hearts , you know , you ’ ve been right from the beginning .
And we can ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all the support that they have given us through this fight .
And , you know , obviously the fight ’ s not over , as you ’ ve been highlighting for not just today , but for a long time .
FLYNN : And the decision today is really , it ’ s a good thing for General Flynn , it ’ s a good thing for me , it ’ s a good thing for my family , but it ’ s really a great boost of confidence for the American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ’ s what this really comes down to , is whether or not our justice system is going to have the confidence of the American people .
And , boy , your listeners know this .
RUSH : You had to have your doubts in it for the longest time .
I can ’ t imagine what it ’ s been like .
FLYNN : ( laughing ) Well , I ’ ll tell you what , maybe there will be another time that we can get into the details of it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that I have always believed and fought for our rule of law .
The most important thing that we have in this country , bar none , is that .
And we have to make it work whether we like it or not , and it has to work with the right people and the right leaders and the people of our country to step up to the plate .
You know , and elections matter , right ?
Voting matters .
So , anyway , I just wanted to get my two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you that we think about you often and we pray for you and that we are so happy with the decision , not only for our family , but for our country .
RUSH : General Flynn , thank you so much .
I ’ m still a little stunned here that I ’ m talking to you .
Have you signed anything ?
Is this really over ?
Or is it just we just assume it ’ s gon na be ?
FLYNN : No , yeah , I mean , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your listeners have been talking about it today .
It never ends .
You know , the struggle for this country — FLYNN : — will never end .
You know this , Rush .
You know this .
We ’ re a country that ’ s an experiment based on some great ideas from some terrific , you know , founding citizens of our country .
So it ’ s never over .
I do not expect it to be over .
You know , this is another — this is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will go into another phase .
But , you know , I ’ m from good Irish stock , so my family has really stuck with us and behind us , and I think a lot of Americans have seen that .
And then people like yourselves , leaders like yourselves have stepped up to the plate to guide the American people through what has happened , what has happened .
So there will be more to say in the future , but I just mainly wanted to say to you thank you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ done for my family and , frankly , for our country .
RUSH : Well , it ’ s been an honor , General Flynn .
And everybody is so happy for you here .
It ’ s actually justice deserved and justice served .
We only wish the best for you and your family , sir , and God bless .
RUSH : Thank you for calling .
FLYNN : Yeah .
Well , one last thing that I will say , that ’ s for all your listeners , and that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ behalf of my family and frankly for our country , is that Ms. Sidney Powell , who ’ s been my terrific lawyer , she is the American guardian of justice .
That ’ s what she is .
And she is somebody who you want in your corner , boy , when you ’ re in the middle of a knife fight , which I have been in .
So I call her American guardian of justice .
Why is this being slow-walked now that we know it was a frame-job ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ he is in trial , he can ’ t go talking about the details publicly .
Don ’ t forget what his credentials are , and why Obama wanted him gone in the first place .
He was trying to audit some of those government slush funds .
Some of what this General might have to say could create some particularly noxious conversations , especially for a nominee who served in that same administration .

General Flynn has had a long, hard fight. Now a court has finally ruled in his favor. That doesn’t mean the fight is over.
The judge who stood in his way has some more devious tricks to play. The nightmare is not yet over. A cynic might almost believe the judge was deliberately running out the clock until after November… for some reason.
It was looking like a vindication when the Appeals court ordered Judge Sullivan to dismiss Flynn’s case. (That’s where things were standing when he called in to Rush Limbaugh’s program.) But the slippery judge hasn’t yet run out of cards to play to take Flynn through the wringer.
JUST IN: SULLIVAN delays all proceedings in the Flynn case. Could be awaiting appeal or a move to hear decision en banc. pic.twitter.com/n3Q0XN8Gd6 — Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) June 24, 2020
While we all wait so see what will happen when that finally plays out, here is the transcript of the optimism we saw in his call with El Rushbo.
Begin transcript:
RUSH: I’m told that we have General Flynn on the phone. Michael Flynn, you are here on the EIB Network, is that right?
FLYNN: How about that, Rush? Yeah, this is Mike Flynn. How you doing?
RUSH: I’m great. I’m a little stunned.
FLYNN: Well, I want to just tell you, first of all, you got a lot of prayers coming from the Flynn family for you and all the things that you’re going through, so just know that. And I just want to say from the bottom of our hearts, you know, you’ve been right from the beginning. And we can’t thank you and your listeners enough for all the support that they have given us through this fight. And, you know, obviously the fight’s not over, as you’ve been highlighting for not just today, but for a long time.
RUSH: Right.
FLYNN: And the decision today is really, it’s a good thing for General Flynn, it’s a good thing for me, it’s a good thing for my family, but it’s really a great boost of confidence for the American people and our justice system, because that’s what this really comes down to, is whether or not our justice system is going to have the confidence of the American people. And, boy, your listeners know this.
RUSH: You had to have your doubts in it for the longest time. I can’t imagine what it’s been like.
FLYNN: (laughing) Well, I’ll tell you what, maybe there will be another time that we can get into the details of it, but I will just tell you that I have always believed and fought for our rule of law. The most important thing that we have in this country, bar none, is that. And we have to make it work whether we like it or not, and it has to work with the right people and the right leaders and the people of our country to step up to the plate. You know, and elections matter, right? Voting matters. So, anyway, I just wanted to get my two cents in with you today and tell you that we think about you often and we pray for you and that we are so happy with the decision, not only for our family, but for our country.
RUSH: General Flynn, thank you so much. I’m still a little stunned here that I’m talking to you. Have you signed anything? Is this really over? Or is it just we just assume it’s gonna be?
FLYNN: No, yeah, I mean, it’s not over. Some of your listeners have been talking about it today. It never ends. You know, the struggle for this country —
RUSH: Right.
FLYNN: — will never end. You know this, Rush. You know this. We’re a country that’s an experiment based on some great ideas from some terrific, you know, founding citizens of our country. So it’s never over. I do not expect it to be over. You know, this is another — this is a phase that has ended. And we will go into another phase.
But, you know, I’m from good Irish stock, so my family has really stuck with us and behind us, and I think a lot of Americans have seen that. And then people like yourselves, leaders like yourselves have stepped up to the plate to guide the American people through what has happened, what has happened. So there will be more to say in the future, but I just mainly wanted to say to you thank you so much for all that you have done for my family and, frankly, for our country.
RUSH: Well, it’s been an honor, General Flynn. And everybody is so happy for you here. It’s actually justice deserved and justice served. We only wish the best for you and your family, sir, and God bless.
FLYNN: Yeah.
RUSH: Thank you for calling.
FLYNN: Yeah. Well, one last thing that I will say, that’s for all your listeners, and that’s for me to say on behalf of my family and frankly for our country, is that Ms. Sidney Powell, who’s been my terrific lawyer, she is the American guardian of justice. That’s what she is. And she is somebody who you want in your corner, boy, when you’re in the middle of a knife fight, which I have been in. So I call her American guardian of justice.
End transcript.
Why is this being slow-walked now that we know it was a frame-job?
For one thing, as long as he is in trial, he can’t go talking about the details publicly. Don’t forget what his credentials are, and why Obama wanted him gone in the first place. He was trying to audit some of those government slush funds. Some of what this General might have to say could create some particularly noxious conversations, especially for a nominee who served in that same administration.


clashdaily--2020-06-25--WATCH: 2 Feelgood Stories The Racial Division-Stoking Media(D) Will NOT Be Featuring On TV

To hear the media tell it , the entire world has taken sides in a pile-on demonizing one group , based on their immutable characteristic of race .
But like so many *other* stories they tell , that isn ’ t the whole story .
When they talk about lethal interactions with police , they highlight the times when black civilians are unjustly killed and underreport the times when white civilians are likewise killed , reinforcing the beliefs of some that police are in the habit of murdering black Americans .
( Is it any wonder we have seen a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ambush situations ? )
The NYTimes have been pushing a revisionist 1619 Project which reimagines the entirety of US history through a lens of racial hostility… as though every American through history has been so crassly one-dimensional that this would make sense , even if it were NOT being discredited by historians .
Well-meaning Americans wanting to show their rejection of racism have thrown support behind a group that has leveraged that goodwill to bankroll an ideology VERY hostile to the American Way of Life .
Its founders are openly admitting they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Of Teddy Roosevelt Will Make Easily Triggered Leftists Weep Between that , and the violent racially-charged mobs running riot in major American cities , you might believe that there is open war between White people and Black people .
Or , if not open war , then perhaps you might have wondered whether it ’ s open season on white people .
Here are a couple of young black guys going above and beyond to help an elderly white couple they most likely didn ’ t know from Adam .
Most likely , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Humans who needed some help .
Another video showed a couple of people coming to the rescue of an elderly white man who had been robbed of about $ 100 by some ‘ raggedy-ass ’ punk .
The rescuers were black .
So was the thief they brought to face the man he robbed from .
Good guys can come in all colors .
So can the bad guys .
Do NOT let your faith in what made America great be shaken .
Here are just two examples among many to remind us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that LOVE America than there are those who hate it .
And if we all stand up together , we can put an end to the agitation that is almost certainly being bankrolled by big-money financiers who live safely behind some kind of a security fence .
People who see ordinary Americans and the local shops that are burned and looted as expendable pawns on a political chessboard .

To hear the media tell it, the entire world has taken sides in a pile-on demonizing one group, based on their immutable characteristic of race. But like so many *other* stories they tell, that isn’t the whole story.
When they talk about lethal interactions with police, they highlight the times when black civilians are unjustly killed and underreport the times when white civilians are likewise killed, reinforcing the beliefs of some that police are in the habit of murdering black Americans. (Is it any wonder we have seen a recent spike in police being murdered in ambush situations?)
The NYTimes have been pushing a revisionist 1619 Project which reimagines the entirety of US history through a lens of racial hostility… as though every American through history has been so crassly one-dimensional that this would make sense, even if it were NOT being discredited by historians.
Well-meaning Americans wanting to show their rejection of racism have thrown support behind a group that has leveraged that goodwill to bankroll an ideology VERY hostile to the American Way of Life. Its founders are openly admitting they are trained Marxists.
Between that, and the violent racially-charged mobs running riot in major American cities, you might believe that there is open war between White people and Black people. Or, if not open war, then perhaps you might have wondered whether it’s open season on white people.
It isn’t.
Here are a couple of young black guys going above and beyond to help an elderly white couple they most likely didn’t know from Adam. Most likely, they just saw a couple of fellow Humans who needed some help.
Two elderly folks were struggling to get back into their car following a stop for gasoline. These three young men saw what was happening and immediately stepped-in to assist. Humanity.?❤ pic.twitter.com/bEi9l2hdaJ — Rex Chapman?? (@RexChapman) June 21, 2020
Another video showed a couple of people coming to the rescue of an elderly white man who had been robbed of about $100 by some ‘raggedy-ass’ punk.
Gothems good citizens are stepping up? pic.twitter.com/5dXS0ghttC — ??????? ??? (@RealDealAxelrod) June 23, 2020
The rescuers were black. So was the thief they brought to face the man he robbed from.
Good guys can come in all colors. So can the bad guys.
Do NOT let your faith in what made America great be shaken. Here are just two examples among many to remind us all that there are more of us that LOVE America than there are those who hate it. And if we all stand up together, we can put an end to the agitation that is almost certainly being bankrolled by big-money financiers who live safely behind some kind of a security fence.
People who see ordinary Americans and the local shops that are burned and looted as expendable pawns on a political chessboard.


clashdaily--2020-06-26--EPIC: No-Nonsense Black Lady Takes La Fayette’s Lincoln Monument-Topplers To Truthtown

There is a big world out there that the Molotov Cocktail chuckers are too blind and ignorant to see .
If they cared to listen , an educated mind like the one this older lady has could quickly set them straight .
In art , there is this thing called ‘ imagery ’ .
The angry mouth-breathers see this Lincoln monument in the shallowest possible terms .
They see a black man in chains kneeling .
They see Lincoln standing .
And they see red .
An important clue to this story would be the fact that Lincoln is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in America to a full and complete end .
They were now , and always , to be free men .
Trending : WATCH : 2 Feelgood Stories The Racial Division-Stoking Media ( D ) Will NOT Be Featuring On TV Any monument involving Lincoln , a slave , and chains should keep this in mind .
The lady , whose name we sadly do not know , or we would gladly credit her for it , took all of a moment to walk us all through the imagery .
A first glance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But look a little closer and you will see something more .
This monument was intended to capture a moment of transformation .
His head is not downcast , with a bowed back as a slave ’ s might be depicted in an art piece .
His head — and his eyes — are upraised and looking forward .
They are looking toward what lies ahead in his boundless future .
The chains are indeed present on the man ’ s wrist .
But look again , and you will see they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any power over him .
Real art , quality art , contains subtlety .
It often takes an attentive eye and an interest in the material to truly appreciate the richness of what can be found in it .
Even simple art pieces often have complex relationships between light and shadow , bold or muted color palette , perspective , or even the choice of what was included or excluded from the image .
If you appreciate artwork , ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg , Doug Giles has an art site that includes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
From serious portraits to Nature in the raw .
His collection comingles great figures from the modern world and great hunters of ancient warrior tribes .
He treads where the timid dare not follow , expressing himself freely in the topics of Religion and Politics .
Check out his collection at DougGiles Art .

There is a big world out there that the Molotov Cocktail chuckers are too blind and ignorant to see. If they cared to listen, an educated mind like the one this older lady has could quickly set them straight.
In art, there is this thing called ‘imagery’.
The angry mouth-breathers see this Lincoln monument in the shallowest possible terms. They see a black man in chains kneeling. They see Lincoln standing. And they see red.
An important clue to this story would be the fact that Lincoln is the President who brought the blight of slavery in America to a full and complete end. They were now, and always, to be free men.
Any monument involving Lincoln, a slave, and chains should keep this in mind.
The lady, whose name we sadly do not know, or we would gladly credit her for it, took all of a moment to walk us all through the imagery.
"That man is not kneeling on two knees with his head bowed. He is in the act of getting up." It's important to know our history.pic.twitter.com/w1IRjIPaNj — The First (@TheFirstonTV) June 24, 2020
A first glance at the kneeling figure may see servitude. But look a little closer and you will see something more. This monument was intended to capture a moment of transformation.
His head is not downcast, with a bowed back as a slave’s might be depicted in an art piece.
His head — and his eyes — are upraised and looking forward. They are looking toward what lies ahead in his boundless future.
The chains are indeed present on the man’s wrist. But look again, and you will see they are broken, and no longer hold any power over him.
Real art, quality art, contains subtlety. It often takes an attentive eye and an interest in the material to truly appreciate the richness of what can be found in it. Even simple art pieces often have complex relationships between light and shadow, bold or muted color palette, perspective, or even the choice of what was included or excluded from the image.
If you appreciate artwork, ClashDaily’s Big Dawg, Doug Giles has an art site that includes a wide variety of styles and genres. From serious portraits to Nature in the raw. His collection comingles great figures from the modern world and great hunters of ancient warrior tribes. He treads where the timid dare not follow, expressing himself freely in the topics of Religion and Politics. Check out his collection at DougGiles Art.


clashdaily--2020-06-26--ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION: SCOTUS Hands Trump A Huge Win With Bogus Asylum Seekers

For a long time , it ’ s been obvious that interested parties have been providing tons of would-be asylum seekers with all the required answers to trigger asylum status .
Those days are now over .
It just got a LOT harder to game the system .
And you don ’ t get to lie your way in and park your ass on American soil while you wait for your case to work through the system .
Just as we would make a difference in our own homes , Trump has always been quick to differentiate foreigners who entered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ slip over the fence .
If you have a legitimate reason to be here , welcome !
If you ’ re lying through your teeth to game the system ?
Hard pass .
Trending : WATCH : 2 Feelgood Stories The Racial Division-Stoking Media ( D ) Will NOT Be Featuring On TV Now , after the courts have been choked for years with bogus claims of Asylum with the specific intent of gaming the system , the Supreme Court has finally delivered a ruling that will help back the President up .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ said people who fail to make a valid case for asylum in their initial screenings , by credibly claiming that they fear persecution at home , can be fast-tracked for deportation and can not challenge that decision in federal court .
The ruling was a defeat for Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam of Sri Lanka , who was detained by federal agents 25 yards north of the U.S.-Mexico border .
He said that as a member of his home country ’ s Tamil minority , he faced harm if returned and had once been kidnapped and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t sure why he was assaulted .
When his asylum claim was rejected , he sought help in federal court by filing a habeas corpus petition , invoking the Constitution ’ s guarantee against unlawful detention .
But the Supreme Court said the option wasn ’ t open to him .
Writing for the majority , Justice Samuel Alito said that form of relief is intended to be used for those seeking release from detention , not as an avenue to get into federal court .
And other constitutional rights of due @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply because they set foot on U.S. soil and have not been legally admitted .
The dissenting votes , for those keeping score at home , were Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan .
We ’ ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with a less than stellar past , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @

For a long time, it’s been obvious that interested parties have been providing tons of would-be asylum seekers with all the required answers to trigger asylum status. Those days are now over.
It just got a LOT harder to game the system. And you don’t get to lie your way in and park your ass on American soil while you wait for your case to work through the system.
Just as we would make a difference in our own homes, Trump has always been quick to differentiate foreigners who entered America through the door from those who slip over the fence.
If you have a legitimate reason to be here, welcome! If you’re lying through your teeth to game the system? Hard pass.
Now, after the courts have been choked for years with bogus claims of Asylum with the specific intent of gaming the system, the Supreme Court has finally delivered a ruling that will help back the President up.
In a 7-2 vote, the court said people who fail to make a valid case for asylum in their initial screenings, by credibly claiming that they fear persecution at home, can be fast-tracked for deportation and cannot challenge that decision in federal court. The ruling was a defeat for Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam of Sri Lanka, who was detained by federal agents 25 yards north of the U.S.-Mexico border. He said that as a member of his home country’s Tamil minority, he faced harm if returned and had once been kidnapped and beaten, though he said he wasn’t sure why he was assaulted. When his asylum claim was rejected, he sought help in federal court by filing a habeas corpus petition, invoking the Constitution’s guarantee against unlawful detention. But the Supreme Court said the option wasn’t open to him. Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito said that form of relief is intended to be used for those seeking release from detention, not as an avenue to get into federal court. And other constitutional rights of due process do not automatically apply to migrants simply because they set foot on U.S. soil and have not been legally admitted.
The dissenting votes, for those keeping score at home, were Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-06-25--Cute Chick Warns Patriots That The Left’s Toppling Of Statues Is Only The Beginning–She’s Seen It Be

Cute Chick Warns Patriots That The Left’s Toppling Of Statues Is Only The Beginning–She’s Seen It Before (VIDEO)

As night after night , monuments across the nation are hauled down by the ropes of triumphant and lawless mobs , the question we hear from both sides is some version of ‘ who cares ’ ?
Are they just hurrying the process of removing some monuments that no longer have a place in modern civil society ?
Or is there something else going on that should be treated as a legitimate threat to the American way of life ?
Nothing quite puts questions like this one in perspective quite like the voice of experience , especially when that experience @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This young woman has seen this story play out once before when she was too young and naive to worry about any possible ramifications .
She grew up in Venezuela .
There ’ s a reason she doesn ’ t live there anymore .
She can ’ t .
The folks who tore down THOSE statues and renamed THOSE streets didn ’ t stop there .
They went after the school curriculum .
And then another thing , and another , and another .
Did you notice what she said about when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who had suffered under similar tactics by Marxist revolutionaries in Cuba ?
Marxist revolutionaries that our own hard-left politicians actually admire .
The warnings fell on deaf ears , and Venezuela became the nation that Bernie Sanders praised on his official Senate website in 2011 : He somehow ignored the fact that ‘ man of the people ’ Chavez somehow managed to have a multi-billionaire daughter while Venezuela ’ s economy circled the toilet .
So far as we are aware , Democrats have STIL not found the political will to oppose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , who has killed his own citizens rather than relinquish his ill-gotten power .
Will America pay more attention to this young woman ’ s warning than her nation did to Cubas ?
We all see how well the revolution worked out for the people of Venezuela .
Their ‘ man of the people ’ revolutionary leader ground one of the Western Hemisphere ’ s most successful economies into a smoking crater where citizens were eating the animals out of the zoo , and cities had no running water .
Paper currency was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was in a store… if anything could be found in that store to buy .
It was just a couple of nights ago that we heard the mob speaking plainly about their intent : We have it in their own words .
This is not a riot .
It ’ s a revolution .
Will we put it down the way every sovereign nation puts down revolutions , or will we let it ignite into a genuine shooting war over the future of the nation ?

As night after night, monuments across the nation are hauled down by the ropes of triumphant and lawless mobs, the question we hear from both sides is some version of ‘who cares’?
That’s the debate we’re hearing.
Are they just hurrying the process of removing some monuments that no longer have a place in modern civil society?
Or is there something else going on that should be treated as a legitimate threat to the American way of life?
This is really all you need to watch today. It can happen here too. pic.twitter.com/aRTijiBTRX — Dave Rubin (@RubinReport) June 25, 2020
Nothing quite puts questions like this one in perspective quite like the voice of experience, especially when that experience was acquired by enduring some soul-crushing suffering.
This young woman has seen this story play out once before when she was too young and naive to worry about any possible ramifications.
She grew up in Venezuela. There’s a reason she doesn’t live there anymore. She can’t. The folks who tore down THOSE statues and renamed THOSE streets didn’t stop there. They went after the school curriculum. And then another thing, and another, and another.
Did you notice what she said about when her friends and neighbors were warned by those who had suffered under similar tactics by Marxist revolutionaries in Cuba? Marxist revolutionaries that our own hard-left politicians actually admire.
The warnings fell on deaf ears, and Venezuela became the nation that Bernie Sanders praised on his official Senate website in 2011:
These days, the American dream is more apt to be realized in South America, in places such as Ecuador, Venezuela and Argentina, where incomes are actually more equal today than they are in the land of Horatio Alger. Who’s the banana republic now?
He somehow ignored the fact that ‘man of the people’ Chavez somehow managed to have a multi-billionaire daughter while Venezuela’s economy circled the toilet. So far as we are aware, Democrats have STIL not found the political will to oppose Venezuela’s current despot, Maduro, who has killed his own citizens rather than relinquish his ill-gotten power.
Will America pay more attention to this young woman’s warning than her nation did to Cubas?
We all see how well the revolution worked out for the people of Venezuela. Their ‘man of the people’ revolutionary leader ground one of the Western Hemisphere’s most successful economies into a smoking crater where citizens were eating the animals out of the zoo, and cities had no running water. Paper currency was worth more woven into fabric than it was in a store… if anything could be found in that store to buy.
It was just a couple of nights ago that we heard the mob speaking plainly about their intent:
Crowd is standing off with police now, chanting, “This is not a riot, this is a revolution.” pic.twitter.com/PIsEMHdTma — Emily Hamer (@ehamer7) June 24, 2020
We have it in their own words. This is not a riot. It’s a revolution.
Will we put it down the way every sovereign nation puts down revolutions, or will we let it ignite into a genuine shooting war over the future of the nation?


clashdaily--2020-06-25--Man Shot In Seattle’s Anarchist Utopia Wants To Sue The Police For This Ridiculous Reason (VIDEO)

This guy clearly isn ’ t the coldest beer in the fridge .
We all watched the drama unfold in Seattle on the national stage .
Police and ‘ protesters ’ with a decidedly violent streak stood toe-to-toe for weeks after the ( allegedly ) George Floyd riots , which quickly morphed into a very different thing .
( Almost like a group was laying in wait for just the right moment to capture and redirect the energy and outrage of the public whipped up about a righteous cause . )
Politicians got cold feet , and gave a stand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ filed out quietly , leaving control to the mob who have been demanding the decommissioning of Seattle ’ s police ever since .
They envision a police-less society .
That was one of the key demands of the squatters who took over Seattle ’ s downtown , threw up a wall , and forbade police to enter .
Trending : WATCH : 2 Feelgood Stories The Racial Division-Stoking Media ( D ) Will NOT Be Featuring On TV What happens when you have an area in which no laws are enforced ?
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were several shootings… but the ambulance was NOT entering that space without police backup , and the police themselves were chased out by the mob .
And that is exactly the ‘ utopia ’ they were fighting for… right ?
Sure it was .
Until… Of course , it should go without saying that him being shot was a bad thing , we hope the guilty party gets caught and punished , and we hope the guy in this clip recovers .
In this video , he is airing grievances about the incident @ @ @ @ @ @ @ good citizens of CHOPistan to mete out appropriate justice upon whoever it was that sent him out of Paradise and into an American hospital ?
No .
That would require being intellectually consistent .
That is something this crowd isn ’ t exactly known for being .
Instead , he ’ s calling out the police for ( no , we aren ’ t kidding ) failing to protect and serve .
You can ’ t make this stuff up , folks .
He wants legal advice .
“ …the cops left me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actually , your friends kept them from coming to your help .

This guy clearly isn’t the coldest beer in the fridge.
We all watched the drama unfold in Seattle on the national stage. Police and ‘protesters’ with a decidedly violent streak stood toe-to-toe for weeks after the (allegedly) George Floyd riots, which quickly morphed into a very different thing. (Almost like a group was laying in wait for just the right moment to capture and redirect the energy and outrage of the public whipped up about a righteous cause.)
Politicians got cold feet, and gave a stand down order to the police, who filed out quietly, leaving control to the mob who have been demanding the decommissioning of Seattle’s police ever since.
They envision a police-less society. That was one of the key demands of the squatters who took over Seattle’s downtown, threw up a wall, and forbade police to enter.
What happens when you have an area in which no laws are enforced? A lot of bad things happen. There were several shootings… but the ambulance was NOT entering that space without police backup, and the police themselves were chased out by the mob.
And that is exactly the ‘utopia’ they were fighting for… right? Sure it was. Until…
A man who got shot in CHAZ now wants to sue the police for not responding fast enough to the "autonomous zone" where they have up barricades barring the police from entering.pic.twitter.com/6udR8zekik — Jason Howerton (@jason_howerton) June 24, 2020
Until this guy survives a shooting.
Of course, it should go without saying that him being shot was a bad thing, we hope the guilty party gets caught and punished, and we hope the guy in this clip recovers.
In this video, he is airing grievances about the incident itself.
Is he calling upon the good citizens of CHOPistan to mete out appropriate justice upon whoever it was that sent him out of Paradise and into an American hospital? No. That would require being intellectually consistent. That is something this crowd isn’t exactly known for being.
Instead, he’s calling out the police for (no, we aren’t kidding) failing to protect and serve.
You can’t make this stuff up, folks. He wants legal advice.
“…the cops left me out there to die…”
No, actually, your friends kept them from coming to your help.
Next time, pick better friends.
Sincerely, Everyone.


clashdaily--2020-06-25--Republican Senator Tim Scott Responds To Pelosi’s Disgusting ‘They’re Trying To Get Away With Murder

Republican Senator Tim Scott Responds To Pelosi’s Disgusting ‘They’re Trying To Get Away With Murder’ Comment

Senate Democrats blocked the GOP police reform bill and their reasons/talking points are absolutely disgusting and divisive .
They have been deploying a new catchphrase to attack Republicans .
You know that police reform both parties have been pitching since , well , almost immediately after those few moments in which the entire country — and beyond !
— was unified in horror at those ghastly final moments of George Floyd ’ s life ?
That life cut short by the actions of one rogue cop and 3 other guys who failed to intervene ?
They have all face criminal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Keep that in mind as we listen to what Pelosi ’ s newest talking point is .
Pelosi said , while describing Senate reforms put forward by Republicans , “ they were trying to get away with murder , the murder of George Floyd.
” So , to recap : the only people personally responsible for the death of George Floyd are facing criminal prosecution .
The Republicans were putting forward reforms ( whether Democrats agreed that they are the correct ones or not is a separate issue ) that would protect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ situation that cost Floyd his life .
And the Democrats ’ coordinated talking point is that the Republicans are… … and it ’ s right there in the video clip… … ’ trying to get away with the murder of George Floyd ’ .
That ’ s not merely dishonest , that is slanderous , and a transparently cynical attempt to play on racial fears and prejudices to suppress the vote of any black voter who has lost confidence in the Democrat party .
Senator Tim Scott , a Republican , has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lately .
Some of us need to hear his experiences as a black man in America who has been racially profiled but still thinks that the vast majority of law enforcement officers are good people .
This video is worth every second to watch : Democrats , from the beginning , said the Reform bill was ‘ unsalvageable ’ …despite the fact that the Senate Bill addressed most of the issues they complained needed fixing .
Senator Scott was used to situations where things get shot down because it ’ s the ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was just used to it as a racial issue .
Now he ’ s getting the same ‘ wrong guy ’ treatment because of the party affiliation .
In the video , above , he ripped the mask off the Democrats ’ duplicitous tactic , showing the ugly faces behind their ‘ altruistic ’ intent .
They don ’ t want to SOLVE this problem , they want to CAMPAIGN on it .
Which prompts the question : which party is it that is ACTUALLY indifferent to the death and suffering of George @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making the rounds on social media was , will it be a Tim Scott/Nikki Haley Republican ticket in 2024 or Nikki Haley/Tim Scott ?
Sure , it ’ s a little early to be looking that far out .
But it IS good to know we still have some people on our side who know how to put the Democrat ’ s feet to the fire when they start slinging their usual Bulls**t. After all , even if we DO win in November , Trump is just one guy .
He can ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by himself .

Senate Democrats blocked the GOP police reform bill and their reasons/talking points are absolutely disgusting and divisive.
They have been deploying a new catchphrase to attack Republicans.
You know that police reform both parties have been pitching since, well, almost immediately after those few moments in which the entire country — and beyond! — was unified in horror at those ghastly final moments of George Floyd’s life? That life cut short by the actions of one rogue cop and 3 other guys who failed to intervene?
They have all face criminal charges, including murder over the event. Keep that in mind as we listen to what Pelosi’s newest talking point is.
.@SenatorTimScott is spot on about why Democrats filibustered common sense police reforms that the vast majority of Americans support. “The actual problem is not WHAT is being offered, it is WHO is offering it.” pic.twitter.com/fL8l29Vb9J — Ronna McDaniel (@GOPChairwoman) June 25, 2020
Pelosi said, while describing Senate reforms put forward by Republicans, “they were trying to get away with murder, the murder of George Floyd.”
So, to recap: the only people personally responsible for the death of George Floyd are facing criminal prosecution. The Republicans were putting forward reforms (whether Democrats agreed that they are the correct ones or not is a separate issue) that would protect civilians from finding themselves in the same situation that cost Floyd his life.
And the Democrats’ coordinated talking point is that the Republicans are…
… and it’s right there in the video clip…
…’trying to get away with the murder of George Floyd’.
That’s not merely dishonest, that is slanderous, and a transparently cynical attempt to play on racial fears and prejudices to suppress the vote of any black voter who has lost confidence in the Democrat party.
Senator Tim Scott, a Republican, has been right on a whole lot of things lately.
Some of us need to hear his experiences as a black man in America who has been racially profiled but still thinks that the vast majority of law enforcement officers are good people.
This video is worth every second to watch:
Democrats, from the beginning, said the Reform bill was ‘unsalvageable’…despite the fact that the Senate Bill addressed most of the issues they complained needed fixing.
Senator Scott was used to situations where things get shot down because it’s the ‘wrong guy’ doing it. He was just used to it as a racial issue. Now he’s getting the same ‘wrong guy’ treatment because of the party affiliation.
In the video, above, he ripped the mask off the Democrats’ duplicitous tactic, showing the ugly faces behind their ‘altruistic’ intent. They don’t want to SOLVE this problem, they want to CAMPAIGN on it.
Which prompts the question: which party is it that is ACTUALLY indifferent to the death and suffering of George Floyd.
So, the big question making the rounds on social media was, will it be a Tim Scott/Nikki Haley Republican ticket in 2024 or Nikki Haley/Tim Scott?
Sure, it’s a little early to be looking that far out. But it IS good to know we still have some people on our side who know how to put the Democrat’s feet to the fire when they start slinging their usual Bulls**t.
After all, even if we DO win in November, Trump is just one guy. He can’t be expected to fight them all by himself.


clashdaily--2020-06-25--HEY PATRIOTS: BLM Leader Makes Dangerous Ultimatum On TV… Is That News?

He ’ s speaking as the New York chair of BLM .
And he said his words could be taken either figuratively or literally .
The Ultimatum he was being asked about was this one : “ If this country doesn ’ t give us what we want , then we will burn down this system.
” He says he could mean that figuratively or he could mean that literally .
Here is the clip in question : For transparency , here is the broader context of his quote : The conversation leading up to it… “ You … have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these situations , ” host Martha MacCallum told Newsome .
“ What exactly is it that you hope to achieve through violence ?
” “ Wow , it ’ s interesting that you would pose that question like that , ” Newsome responded , “ because this country is built upon violence .
What was the American Revolution , what ’ s our diplomacy across the globe ?
“ We go in and we blow up countries and we replace their leaders with leaders who we like .
So for any American to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hypocritical.
” She reframed it , and tried again , which we can hear in the short clip .
He goes on to explain after that… “ I said , ” Newsome told the host , “ if this country doesn ’ t give us what we want , then we will burn down this system and replace it .
All right ?
And I could be speaking … figuratively .
I could be speaking literally .
It ’ s a matter of interpretation .
“ Let ’ s observe the history of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rioting , ” he went on .
“ We had the highest growth in wealth , in property ownership .
Think about the last few weeks since we started protesting .
There have been eight cops fired across the country.
” “ I don ’ t condone nor do I condemn rioting , ” Newsome added .
“ But I ’ m just telling you what I observed.
” So , this leader in a movement whose founders have described themselves as ‘ trained Marxists ’ has absolutely no official opinion on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ characteristic of Marxist uprisings through history ?
As for his claim about violence being inherent in American life ?
The toppling of governments of a foreign power with whom we are in conflict — is an act of war .
What we saw in 1776 was also a toppling of government , demanding self-rule .
America already HAS that self-rule .
Every four years , and even more frequently than that , America stages a coup and topples the government in a smooth transfer of power .
It ’ s called an election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NOT ‘ what democracy looks like ’ .
It ’ s what sedition looks like .
It ’ s also known by another name : terrorism .
America has laws against such things because the orderly toppling and reforming of government every four years DESERVES to be protected by those who would disenfranchise the public by forcing their own will with expressions of raw force and power .

He’s speaking as the New York chair of BLM. And he said his words could be taken either figuratively or literally.
The Ultimatum he was being asked about was this one:
“If this country doesn’t give us what we want, then we will burn down this system.”
He says he could mean that figuratively or he could mean that literally.
Greater New York Black Lives Matter president Hawk Newsome joined “The Story” Wednesday to discuss the direction of the movement in the wake of George Floyd’s death in police custody and the subsequent demonstrations across the country, many of which have sparked destruction and violence.
Here is the clip in question:
This is the leader of Black Lives Matter… Talking about burning down this country if they don’t get the outcome they want. This is terrorism. pic.twitter.com/HBbPAqnuSY — Ryan Fournier (@RyanAFournier) June 25, 2020
For transparency, here is the broader context of his quote:
The conversation leading up to it…
“You … have said that violence is sometimes necessary in these situations,” host Martha MacCallum told Newsome. “What exactly is it that you hope to achieve through violence?” “Wow, it’s interesting that you would pose that question like that,” Newsome responded, “because this country is built upon violence. What was the American Revolution, what’s our diplomacy across the globe? “We go in and we blow up countries and we replace their leaders with leaders who we like. So for any American to accuse us of being violent is extremely hypocritical.”
She reframed it, and tried again, which we can hear in the short clip. He goes on to explain after that…
“I said,” Newsome told the host, “if this country doesn’t give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it. All right? And I could be speaking … figuratively. I could be speaking literally. It’s a matter of interpretation. “Let’s observe the history of the 1960s, when black people were rioting,” he went on. “We had the highest growth in wealth, in property ownership. Think about the last few weeks since we started protesting. There have been eight cops fired across the country.” “I don’t condone nor do I condemn rioting,” Newsome added. “But I’m just telling you what I observed.”
So, this leader in a movement whose founders have described themselves as ‘trained Marxists’ has absolutely no official opinion on the kind of violent revolts and upheavals so characteristic of Marxist uprisings through history?
That seems … implausible.
As for his claim about violence being inherent in American life? The toppling of governments of a foreign power with whom we are in conflict — is an act of war. What we saw in 1776 was also a toppling of government, demanding self-rule.
America already HAS that self-rule. Every four years, and even more frequently than that, America stages a coup and topples the government in a smooth transfer of power.
It’s called an election. Violent actions for political purposes is NOT ‘what democracy looks like’. It’s what sedition looks like. It’s also known by another name: terrorism.
America has laws against such things because the orderly toppling and reforming of government every four years DESERVES to be protected by those who would disenfranchise the public by forcing their own will with expressions of raw force and power.


clashdaily--2020-06-25--Nothing To See Here…Move Along

Nothing To See Here…Move Along

You may , at one time or another , come up on some event and hear that from a police officer or a firefighter .
Most people , and I ’ m one of them , drive slowly past whatever it is because they want to see it , and silently say a prayer that it wasn ’ t them .
That is part of what I could call human nature .
Human nature takes many forms , depending on what the person is experiencing…and sometimes that “ human ” part gets lost in whatever is taking place at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the thinking , reasoning , animal…but there are times and people where humanity completely disappears .
Fifteen months back , in March of 2019 , an altercation occurred .
It wasn ’ t really much of an altercation because the victim was eighty-five years old .
He was holding a banner expressing his view of abortion , which was for it .
The pro-lifer was participating in a peaceful 40 Days for Life campaign when the assailant stole the victim ’ s banner and viciously beat the victim .
The same assailant had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two days prior .
The elderly man tried to stop the theft of the banner by putting a stick holding the banner into the spokes of the bicycle .
The perpetrator shoved the man to the ground and began violently and repeatedly kicking and threatening him .
“ We are appalled by this brazen assault against an elderly man who was simply exercising his First Amendment rights on a public sidewalk , ” said Life Legal Executive Director Alexandra Snyder .
“ The vicious attack against our elderly client is intolerable , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Police took statements from the pro-lifers assaulted , but it isn ’ t likely the police in such a left-wing city will be much interested in doing anything about the attack .
At the time this assault took place I don ’ t believe anyone had a clue as to what was coming down the pike to America…but we ’ re in the morass now , up to our eyeballs , aren ’ t ’ we ?
Trending : WATCH : 2 Feelgood Stories The Racial Division-Stoking Media ( D ) Will NOT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Breitbart News had a story about the MANY violent things put up against President Trump .
They reported that when not calling Trump supporters “ Nazis ” as a means to dehumanize us , the establishment media like to whine about the lack of civility in American politics , even as they cover up , ignore , downplay , or straight-up approve of the wave of violence and public harassment we are seeing against supporters of President Trump .
It is open season on Trump supporters , and the media is only fomenting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for more .
The media are now openly calling Trump supporters “ Nazis ” and are blaming Trump for a mass murder he had nothing to do with .
This , of course , is a form of harassment because it incites and justifies mob violence .
There is a list of these things , and it ’ s 639 individual mentions .
There ’ s a Twitter note actually threatening the President ’ s family…but Twitter didn ’ t take it down .
A cadre of Hollyweird people , among them James @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ Blood in the Streets ’ Unless Trump Stopped ” .
A New Jersey GOP Congressional Candidate Receives Letter Threatening His Children…his children !
Think of that .
Do you remember Mitch McConnell and his wife being threatened and chased out of a restaurant where they were simply trying to have a quiet meal ?
Rosie O ’ Donnell calls on the military to remove Trump , as if she had any pull with the armed forces…even though she ’ s got a lot of moxie to make statements like that .
Threats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and , unless I ’ m mistaken , members of the administration , are felonies .
Why aren ’ t these people making these outrageous statements being picked up and jailed , while they await trial ?
Surely the evidence is there in plain sight .
Republican State Rep. Sarah Anderson was assaulted in Minnesota , so October of 2018 was a very busy month for people that I would have no problem labeling as anti-American .
A Minnesota DFL staffer has been suspended from his job after suggesting in a social media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nov. 6 election .
In response to a Facebook post that listed Nov. 6 as the day to “ take back your country , ” DFL deputy communications director William Davis wrote “ 11.7-bring them to the guillotines.
” Vandals targeted the Metropolitan Republican Club in Manhattan on Thursday evening ( October 12 , 2018 ) in an apparent politically-motivated intimidation campaign .
The Metropolitan Republican Club said Antifa had been trying to shut down their event on Friday evening with conservative pundit Gavin McInnes .
The official spokesperson for the club said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to get the Metropolitan Republican Club to cancel the McInnes speech .
The group ’ s latest attempt to shut down the event involved vandalizing the club ’ s 1930s , pre-war building and leaving a threatening letter , part of which said , “ Tonight , we put the Republican Party on notice , ” the letter begins , labeling McInnes a “ hipster-fascist clown ” and accused the club members of “ treachery against humanity .
Our attack is merely a beginning .
We are not passive , we are not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” the letter continues .
“ Those of good conscience and clear mind know this state of oppression can not remain.
” Parting shot : I said at the beginning that the human part of our nature has sometimes gone missing .
At this time in our history , it seems to have departed from our psyche entirely .
Unless , and until , we take positive , strong , action…we are lost .

You may, at one time or another, come up on some event and hear that from a police officer or a firefighter. Most people, and I’m one of them, drive slowly past whatever it is because they want to see it, and silently say a prayer that it wasn’t them. That is part of what I could call human nature. Human nature takes many forms, depending on what the person is experiencing…and sometimes that “human” part gets lost in whatever is taking place at the time. Humans are supposed to be the thinking, reasoning, animal…but there are times and people where humanity completely disappears.
Fifteen months back, in March of 2019, an altercation occurred. It wasn’t really much of an altercation because the victim was eighty-five years old. He was holding a banner expressing his view of abortion, which was for it. The pro-lifer was participating in a peaceful 40 Days for Life campaign when the assailant stole the victim’s banner and viciously beat the victim. The same assailant had assaulted the victim and another man just two days prior. The elderly man tried to stop the theft of the banner by putting a stick holding the banner into the spokes of the bicycle. The perpetrator shoved the man to the ground and began violently and repeatedly kicking and threatening him.
“We are appalled by this brazen assault against an elderly man who was simply exercising his First Amendment rights on a public sidewalk,” said Life Legal Executive Director Alexandra Snyder.
“The vicious attack against our elderly client is intolerable,” Life Legal Senior Counsel Allison Arand. Police took statements from the pro-lifers assaulted, but it isn’t likely the police in such a left-wing city will be much interested in doing anything about the attack. At the time this assault took place I don’t believe anyone had a clue as to what was coming down the pike to America…but we’re in the morass now, up to our eyeballs, aren’t’ we?
July of 2018 Breitbart News had a story about the MANY violent things put up against President Trump. They reported that when not calling Trump supporters “Nazis” as a means to dehumanize us, the establishment media like to whine about the lack of civility in American politics, even as they cover up, ignore, downplay, or straight-up approve of the wave of violence and public harassment we are seeing against supporters of President Trump. It is open season on Trump supporters, and the media is only fomenting, encouraging, excusing, and hoping for more. The media are now openly calling Trump supporters “Nazis” and are blaming Trump for a mass murder he had nothing to do with. This, of course, is a form of harassment because it incites and justifies mob violence. There is a list of these things, and it’s 639 individual mentions. There’s a Twitter note actually threatening the President’s family…but Twitter didn’t take it down. A cadre of Hollyweird people, among them James Cromwell said, “There will Be ‘Blood in the Streets’ Unless Trump Stopped”. A New Jersey GOP Congressional Candidate Receives Letter Threatening His Children…his children! Think of that.
Do you remember Mitch McConnell and his wife being threatened and chased out of a restaurant where they were simply trying to have a quiet meal? Rosie O’Donnell calls on the military to remove Trump, as if she had any pull with the armed forces…even though she’s got a lot of moxie to make statements like that. Threats against the President, his family, and, unless I’m mistaken, members of the administration, are felonies. Why aren’t these people making these outrageous statements being picked up and jailed, while they await trial? Surely the evidence is there in plain sight. Republican State Rep. Sarah Anderson was assaulted in Minnesota, so October of 2018 was a very busy month for people that I would have no problem labeling as anti-American. A Minnesota DFL staffer has been suspended from his job after suggesting in a social media post that Republicans face beheading after the Nov. 6 election. In response to a Facebook post that listed Nov. 6 as the day to “take back your country,” DFL deputy communications director William Davis wrote “11.7-bring them to the guillotines.”
Vandals targeted the Metropolitan Republican Club in Manhattan on Thursday evening (October 12, 2018)in an apparent politically-motivated intimidation campaign. The Metropolitan Republican Club said Antifa had been trying to shut down their event on Friday evening with conservative pundit Gavin McInnes. The official spokesperson for the club said Antifa had “desperately” been trying to get the Metropolitan Republican Club to cancel the McInnes speech. The group’s latest attempt to shut down the event involved vandalizing the club’s 1930s, pre-war building and leaving a threatening letter, part of which said, “Tonight, we put the Republican Party on notice,” the letter begins, labeling McInnes a “hipster-fascist clown” and accused the club members of “treachery against humanity. Our attack is merely a beginning. We are not passive, we are not civil, and we will not apologize,” the letter continues. “Those of good conscience and clear mind know this state of oppression cannot remain.”
Parting shot: I said at the beginning that the human part of our nature has sometimes gone missing. At this time in our history, it seems to have departed from our psyche entirely. Unless, and until, we take positive, strong, action…we are lost.


clashdaily--2020-06-26--It Took Just 4 Months For Americans To Lay Aside Their Rights

Have you taken a look around , lately ?
A lot has changed in 4 months .
Is this still the America you THOUGHT it was ?
If our founders were around right now they would stomp on this current crop of micro-managers like a narc at a biker party .
Literally .
Yep , from a freedom standpoint , our founders were a horse of a different stripe .
Trending : Cute Chick Warns Patriots That The Left ’ s Toppling Of Statues Is Only The Beginning–She ’ s Seen It Before ( VIDEO ) Anti-Patriots have been pushing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time .
That change looks an awful lot like a Marxist Revolution .
Is this still Partick Henry ’ s America ?
Is this still the Greatest Generation ’ s America ?
Is this even still Ronald Reagan ’ s America ?
When did Americans become so timid that we would accept voluntary servitude to those openly hostile to us and our way of life , rather than stand and defend what ’ s ours ?
Did the Old Soviets actually find a way to beat us after all ?
And without firing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ still something left of the Spirit that first led America out of obscurity and into a position of Global leadership ?
Something left of that fighting spirit in the Partiots who still call this home .
The other side is organized and goal-oriented .
They know what they want and are willing to pay a price to get there .
They don ’ t give a damn about playing by laws or quaint , antiquated rules .
They don ’ t care about your feelings .
They don ’ t care about social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to bully , intimidate , work in a pack , and refuse to take ‘ no ’ for an answer .
Exactly what are America ’ s defenders willing to do to stop them from creating chaos and , they hope , toppling the government to put something else in its place ?
The game is already begun , and they are hoping to win by forfeit .
Will they ?
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg .
While you ’ re at it , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to paint Jesus as a non-offensive bearded woman who endorses their agenda .
This book blows that nonsense all to hell .
From the stonking laptop of bestselling author , Doug Giles , comes a new book that focuses on Jesus ’ overt masculine traits like no other books have heretofore .
It ’ s informative , bold , hilarious , and scary .
Giles has concluded , after many years of scouring the scripture that , If Masculinity Is ‘ Toxic ’ , @ @ @ @

Have you taken a look around, lately? A lot has changed in 4 months. Is this still the America you THOUGHT it was?
If our founders were around right now they would stomp on this current crop of micro-managers like a narc at a biker party. Literally.
Yep, from a freedom standpoint, our founders were a horse of a different stripe.
They hated control freaks.
They loathed tyrants.
Anti-Patriots have been pushing ‘Fundamental Change’ for a long time. That change looks an awful lot like a Marxist Revolution.
Is this still Partick Henry’s America?
Is this still the Greatest Generation’s America?
Is this even still Ronald Reagan’s America?
When did Americans become so timid that we would accept voluntary servitude to those openly hostile to us and our way of life, rather than stand and defend what’s ours?
Did the Old Soviets actually find a way to beat us after all? And without firing g a shot?
Or is there still something left of the Spirit that first led America out of obscurity and into a position of Global leadership? Something left of that fighting spirit in the Partiots who still call this home.
The other side is organized and goal-oriented. They know what they want and are willing to pay a price to get there.
They don’t give a damn about playing by laws or quaint, antiquated rules. They don’t care about your feelings. They don’t care about social expectations. They are more than willing to bully, intimidate, work in a pack, and refuse to take ‘no’ for an answer.
Exactly what are America’s defenders willing to do to stop them from creating chaos and, they hope, toppling the government to put something else in its place?
The game is already begun, and they are hoping to win by forfeit. Will they?
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg. While you’re at it, here’s his latest book:
Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to paint Jesus as a non-offensive bearded woman who endorses their agenda. This book blows that nonsense all to hell. From the stonking laptop of bestselling author, Doug Giles, comes a new book that focuses on Jesus’ overt masculine traits like no other books have heretofore. It’s informative, bold, hilarious, and scary. Giles has concluded, after many years of scouring the scripture that, If Masculinity Is ‘Toxic’, Call Jesus Radioactive.


clashdaily--2020-06-26--Cancel Joe? Biden’s Slaveholding Ancestry Is Right There In His Name

It ’ s only been a few weeks since Al Sharpton made a big deal in Floyd ’ s Eulogy that his name was evidence of his own family ’ s history as slaves .
Can he still vote for Joe Biden ?
Seriously , if the Cancel Culture is toppling monuments to abolitionists and religious figures over ‘ wokeness ’ issues , how could Biden survive this latest revelation ?
Anna Slatz of Rebel News reported that one of Joe Biden ’ s ancestors was a slaveholder .
Does this mean that Joe needs to step back since he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s the New Rules as wokescold leftists have made perfectly clear .
It ’ s especially egregious since Joe ’ s middle name bears the name of his slave-holding ancestor .
Is he proud of his slaveholding ancestor ?
The least he could do is change his name , right ?
If George Washington and Thomas Jefferson can be erased despite their own personal positions on slavery , and Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant are also suddenly “ problematic ” despite their role in freeing slaves , surely someone who still @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be forced to change it to show his contrition for his ancestor ’ s actions , right ?
What ’ s worse is that of the 7 slaves held by Biden ’ s great-great-great-grandfather , Jesse Robinette , in the 1830 census he reported that 5 of his slaves were minors–3 boys under the age of 15 and 2 girls under the age of 10 .
Biden ’ s ancestor wasn ’ t just a slaveholder , he had children as his slaves .
[ It ’ s taking quite a bit of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Uncle Joe ” joke right here , so a link will have to do . ]
As ClashDaily has reported many , many times , Joe Biden has a history of racially insensitive remarks that are tone-deaf at best and racist at worst .
• Dear Leftists : Old Video Of Joe Biden Surfaces Where He Says The N-Word Twice–Is He ‘ Canceled ’ ?
• ‘ Then You Ain ’ t Black ’ : Biden On Breakfast Club Disses Anyone Not Voting For Him ( Video ) • Sleepy Joe : The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ With A ‘ Racist ’ Statement • Hey Biden : Can You Explain Why You Called These KKK Supporters ‘ Fine People ’ ?
( Video ) But clearly the best thing that could happen in the 2020 race is if Joe Biden takes another descendant of slave owners to join him on the Democratic ticket , and she ’ s already on his “ short list ” –California Senator Kamala Harris .
REPARATIONS : Kamala Harris ’ s Dad Reveals They Are Descended From A SLAVE OWNER What ’ s ironic is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for slavery and Biden has been criticized for not supporting reparations .
How will they square that circle ?
Let ’ s just get this Biden-Harris 2020 thing going right now .

It’s only been a few weeks since Al Sharpton made a big deal in Floyd’s Eulogy that his name was evidence of his own family’s history as slaves. Can he still vote for Joe Biden?
Seriously, if the Cancel Culture is toppling monuments to abolitionists and religious figures over ‘wokeness’ issues, how could Biden survive this latest revelation?
Anna Slatz of Rebel News reported that one of Joe Biden’s ancestors was a slaveholder.
Biden’s lineage was traced by genealogical expert William Addams Reitwiesner, an American genealogist who was best known for tracing the ancestry of celebrities, U.S Political figures, and English royalty. In an extensive tree created by Reitweinser prior to his 2010 death, he attempted to detail Biden’s heritage to the 9th-extended great grandparent, but it is the well-documented section on Biden’s alleged great-great-great grandparents that have caught the attention of some internet sleuths. Jesse Robinette, whose surname is shared with Joe Biden’s middle name, was a slaveowner. Source: Rebel News (Emphasis added)
Does this mean that Joe needs to step back since he has “problematic” ancestry? Them’s the New Rules as wokescold leftists have made perfectly clear. It’s especially egregious since Joe’s middle name bears the name of his slave-holding ancestor. Is he proud of his slaveholding ancestor? The least he could do is change his name, right? If George Washington and Thomas Jefferson can be erased despite their own personal positions on slavery, and Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant are also suddenly “problematic” despite their role in freeing slaves, surely someone who still holds the name of a slaveholder should be forced to change it to show his contrition for his ancestor’s actions, right?
What’s worse is that of the 7 slaves held by Biden’s great-great-great-grandfather, Jesse Robinette, in the 1830 census he reported that 5 of his slaves were minors–3 boys under the age of 15 and 2 girls under the age of 10.
Biden’s ancestor wasn’t just a slaveholder, he had children as his slaves.
[It’s taking quite a bit of restraint to not make a “Creepy Uncle Joe” joke right here, so a link will have to do.]
As ClashDaily has reported many, many times, Joe Biden has a history of racially insensitive remarks that are tone-deaf at best and racist at worst.
Here’s a sample:
But clearly the best thing that could happen in the 2020 race is if Joe Biden takes another descendant of slave owners to join him on the Democratic ticket, and she’s already on his “short list”–California Senator Kamala Harris.
ClashDaily reported on Harris’s slave-owning ancestry here:
REPARATIONS: Kamala Harris’s Dad Reveals They Are Descended From A SLAVE OWNER
That’ll help heal race-relations, eh?
What’s ironic is that wokescold Harris is advocating for reparations for slavery and Biden has been criticized for not supporting reparations. How will they square that circle?
C’mon, Joe…do it!
Let’s just get this Biden-Harris 2020 thing going right now.
We’re ready for it!


clashdaily--2020-06-26--California Legislature Votes To Remove Non-Discrimination Clause From State Constitution

Will California legalize racial discrimination in these racially sensitive times ?
It appears that it ’ s well on its way .
During this highly-charged moment where race is playing a significant part of public discourse , some very strange things are happening–America seems to be reverting to its pre-Civil Rights history , but it ’ s all in the name of anti-racism .
We ’ ve seen voluntary segregation , white protesters berating black cops , and ahistorical nutters tearing down statues of abolitionists and Union heroes like President Abraham Lincoln and General Ulysses S. Grant .
Now , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legislature remove a provision in their state constitution that prevents discrimination in order to pave the way to restoring Affirmative Action .
Trending : Cute Chick Warns Patriots That The Left ’ s Toppling Of Statues Is Only The Beginning–She ’ s Seen It Before ( VIDEO ) There is a movement afoot to repeal Proposition 209 which ended Affirmative Action in California in 1996 .
The text in question reads , “ The State shall not discriminate against , or grant preferential treatment to , any individual or group on the basis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ethnicity , or national origin in the operation of public employment , public education , or public contracting.
” The repeal Prop 209 motion will be on the November 2020 ballot .
ACA 5 would repeal Section 31 , Article 1 of the state constitution .
The entire text of Section 31 , Article 1 reads as follows : ( a ) The State shall not discriminate against , or grant preferential treatment to , any individual or group on the basis of race , sex , color , ethnicity , or national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , public education , or public contracting .
( b ) This section shall apply only to action taken after the section ’ s effective date .
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting bona fide qualifications based on sex which are reasonably necessary to the normal operation of public employment , public education , or public contracting .
( d ) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as invalidating any court order or consent decree which is in force as of the effective date of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting action which must be taken to establish or maintain eligibility for any federal program , where ineligibility would result in a loss of federal funds to the State .
( f ) For the purposes of this section , “ State ” shall include , but not necessarily be limited to , the State itself , any city , county , city and county , public university system , including the University of California , community college district , school district , special district , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of or within the State .
( g ) The remedies available for violations of this section shall be the same , regardless of the injured party ’ s race , sex , color , ethnicity , or national origin , as are otherwise available for violations of then-existing California antidiscrimination law .
( h ) This section shall be self-executing .
If any part or parts of this section are found to be in conflict with federal law or the United States Constitution , the section shall be implemented to the maximum @ @ @ @ @ @ @ States Constitution permit .
Any provision held invalid shall be severable from the remaining portions of this section .
ACA 5 also includes widely disputed and blatantly ideological statements such as : WHEREAS , As a result of the passage of Proposition 209 , women and people of color continue to face discrimination and disparity in opportunities to participate in numerous forms of association and work that are crucial to the development of talents and capabilities that enable people to contribute meaningfully to , and benefit from , the collective possibilities of national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , particularly women of color , continue to face unequal pay for equal work .
White women are paid 80 cents to every dollar paid to white men doing the same work .
Black women are paid 60 cents for every dollar paid to white men doing the same work and would theoretically have to work an extra seven months every year to overcome that differential .
This persistent gender wage gap continues to harm women , their families , and communities ; … According to Ballotpedia , a “ yes ” vote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or grant preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race , sex , color , ethnicity , or national origin in the operation of public employment , public education , or public contracting .
Proponents of the move say that this will provide “ equity ” by reasserting Affirmative Action to ensure that minority quotas are reinstated in college admissions and hiring practices .
Opponents say that this would simply cause discrimination against other groups , such as Asians who are discriminated against in college and university admissions .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Animal Farm , that ’ s just fine because some races are just “ more equal than others.
” What these geniuses haven ’ t figured out is that this isn ’ t just about race , but also includes , “ sex , color , ethnicity , or national origin ” that can be used as metrics for discrimination .
Just wait until they realize that .
The “ progressives ” also don ’ t seem to realize that this kind of legislation turns the clock backward , not forward .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1964 Civil Rights Act .
Civil rights legislation was championed by President John F. Kennedy after the violence inflicted on peaceful protesters in Alabama in 1963 .
Kennedy said that the United States “ will not be fully free until all of its citizens are free.
” Kenndy didn ’ t get to see the fruit of his proposed legislation because he was assassinated , but his cause was quickly picked up by his successor .
The Civil Rights Act was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964 .
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legislation to end discrimination based on race such as the 1965 Voting Rights Act and the 1968 Fair Housing Act .
But the Civil Rights Act wasn ’ t an easy thing to get passed because of opposition from…Democrats .
Rev .
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. called the Civil Rights Act nothing less than a “ second emancipation.
” And now Cali is looking to repeal words to the same effect in their state constitution to quell the rage of the wokescolds that are pushing to judge people based on the color @ @ @ @ @ @ @ content of their character .

Will California legalize racial discrimination in these racially sensitive times? It appears that it’s well on its way.
During this highly-charged moment where race is playing a significant part of public discourse, some very strange things are happening–America seems to be reverting to its pre-Civil Rights history, but it’s all in the name of anti-racism.
We’ve seen voluntary segregation, white protesters berating black cops, and ahistorical nutters tearing down statues of abolitionists and Union heroes like President Abraham Lincoln and General Ulysses S. Grant.
Now, we’re seeing the California State legislature remove a provision in their state constitution that prevents discrimination in order to pave the way to restoring Affirmative Action.
There is a movement afoot to repeal Proposition 209 which ended Affirmative Action in California in 1996. The text in question reads, “The State shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.” The repeal Prop 209 motion will be on the November 2020 ballot.
ACA 5 would repeal Section 31, Article 1 of the state constitution.
The entire text of Section 31, Article 1 reads as follows:
(a) The State shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. (b) This section shall apply only to action taken after the section’s effective date. (c) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting bona fide qualifications based on sex which are reasonably necessary to the normal operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. (d) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as invalidating any court order or consent decree which is in force as of the effective date of this section. (e) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as prohibiting action which must be taken to establish or maintain eligibility for any federal program, where ineligibility would result in a loss of federal funds to the State. (f) For the purposes of this section, “State” shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the State itself, any city, county, city and county, public university system, including the University of California, community college district, school district, special district, or any other political subdivision or governmental instrumentality of or within the State. (g) The remedies available for violations of this section shall be the same, regardless of the injured party’s race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin, as are otherwise available for violations of then-existing California antidiscrimination law. (h) This section shall be self-executing. If any part or parts of this section are found to be in conflict with federal law or the United States Constitution, the section shall be implemented to the maximum extent that federal law and the United States Constitution permit. Any provision held invalid shall be severable from the remaining portions of this section. Source: Justia
The California legislature has now voted to strike these words from our state
constitution: “The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin.” I’m speechless. pic.twitter.com/X09mWlM9sX — Steve Miller (@SteveMillerOC) June 24, 2020
Yes, this is real. Assembly Constitutional Amendment 5 (“ACA5”) has only one clause: delete Section 31 from the California state constitution.https://t.co/WiXT1N0Mku pic.twitter.com/qdZJiELGfl — Steve Miller (@SteveMillerOC) June 26, 2020
ACA 5 also includes widely disputed and blatantly ideological statements such as:
WHEREAS, As a result of the passage of Proposition 209, women and people of color continue to face discrimination and disparity in opportunities to participate in numerous forms of association and work that are crucial to the development of talents and capabilities that enable people to contribute meaningfully to, and benefit from, the collective possibilities of national life; and
… WHEREAS, Women, particularly women of color, continue to face unequal pay for equal work. White women are paid 80 cents to every dollar paid to white men doing the same work. Black women are paid 60 cents for every dollar paid to white men doing the same work and would theoretically have to work an extra seven months every year to overcome that differential. This persistent gender wage gap continues to harm women, their families, and communities; …
According to Ballotpedia, a “yes” vote would permit the state to discriminate against or grant preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.
Proponents of the move say that this will provide “equity” by reasserting Affirmative Action to ensure that minority quotas are reinstated in college admissions and hiring practices. Opponents say that this would simply cause discrimination against other groups, such as Asians who are discriminated against in college and university admissions. But, as in Orwell’s Animal Farm, that’s just fine because some races are just “more equal than others.”
What these geniuses haven’t figured out is that this isn’t just about race, but also includes, “sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin” that can be used as metrics for discrimination.
Just wait until they realize that.
The “progressives” also don’t seem to realize that this kind of legislation turns the clock backward, not forward. It’s in direct contradiction to the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Civil rights legislation was championed by President John F. Kennedy after the violence inflicted on peaceful protesters in Alabama in 1963. Kennedy said that the United States “will not be fully free until all of its citizens are free.” Kenndy didn’t get to see the fruit of his proposed legislation because he was assassinated, but his cause was quickly picked up by his successor. The Civil Rights Act was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964. That paved the way for additional Civil Rights legislation to end discrimination based on race such as the 1965 Voting Rights Act and the 1968 Fair Housing Act.
But the Civil Rights Act wasn’t an easy thing to get passed because of opposition from…Democrats.
The bill then moved to the U.S. Senate, where southern and border state Democrats staged a 75-day filibuster—among the longest in U.S. history. On one occasion, Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, a former Ku Klux Klan member, spoke for over 14 consecutive hours. But with the help of behind-the-scenes horse-trading, the bill’s supporters eventually obtained the two-thirds votes necessary to end debate. One of those votes came from California Senator Clair Engle, who, though too sick to speak, signaled “aye” by pointing to his own eye. Source: History.com (Emphasis added)
Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. called the Civil Rights Act nothing less than a “second emancipation.”
And now Cali is looking to repeal words to the same effect in their state constitution to quell the rage of the wokescolds that are pushing to judge people based on the color of their skin rather than on the content of their character.
Good job, Cali. Good job.