clashdaily--2020-05-12--What Does The Second Amendment Have In Common With Back To Work Protests?

It all goes back to the foundational reasons behind the rights .
If you ask around , why do we have the right to bear arms , you could almost get a different answer every time you ask it .
Gun-grabbers will probably trot out their usual smug dig about ‘ overcompensating ’ for a specifically masculine shortcoming .
Or they might drop in their favorite made-up word , ‘ ammosexual ’ .
Those are unserious people and can be dismissed as such .
More thoughtful answers will center around the practical uses of the gun itself .
Avid hunters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in their answer .
Others might prioritize home defense .
‘ When seconds count , the police are minutes away.
’ Others might have the Minutemen in mind .
‘ Sic semper tyrannis ’ .
America was a nation forged by individuals taking a stand against a global power to defend their personal rights from tyrannical rule — and many will gladly do so again if it becomes necessary .
Here are a few of the Founders ’ and Framers ’ thoughts on the Second Amendment specifically , ( and rights more generally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ debarred the use of arms [ within his own lands or tenements ] .
• Laws that forbid the carrying of arms… disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants ; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides , for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man .
• A free people [ claim ] their rights as derived from the laws of nature , and not as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ See the rest of the list these were lifted from , here . ]
That last point about the laws of nature is key to this discussion .
For gun ownership , the law of nature argument is simple .
It goes something like this : At no time does a man forfeit the right to protect his life from that which may threaten it .
This framing of the question takes us beyond specific application arguments to the broader principle upon which gun ownership is founded , and moves it into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ , mentioned above .
Certain specific conditions might disqualify a person from lawful gun ownership , but his natural state is liberty until the State can show just cause otherwise .
Then the other reasons follow .
A gun helps a free citizen to defend himself against wild animals .
Or defend his home and person against burglars and criminals with violent intent .
Or defend his freedom against tyrants who would rob him of it .
Hunting falls in this same argument .
It is the means by which a hunter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want .
And unless that hunter has done something to disqualify him from owning a firearm to do so , he has a right to use his firearm to feed his family , so long as various conservation laws are heeded .
And that ’ s where we see the parallel to the Back To Work protests .
Whether we see Shelly Luther opening her nail salon , Elon Musk reopening Tesla , Doctor Hotze leading a back-to-work rebellion , or a desperate-to-survive Colorado restauranteur reopening her restaurant for Mothers ’ day , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ idea .
Some rights are theirs by birth , whether the government likes it or not .
And that includes the right to put food on your table through any lawful employment .
If a government wants to stand in the way of that right , they ’ d better produce a damned compelling reason , because the burden of proof is on their reasons to block our rights , NOT on ours to exercise them .
And the evidence for the protracted ‘ pause ’ in the lives of millions of Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply put food on their kids ’ tables is looking less and less justifiable as time goes on .
Politicians are scared to take a chance at being wrong .
Most fear the panic-mongering press and would rather destroy lives and livelihoods under the cover of ‘ abundance of caution ’ than trusting their fellow Americans to take risks the rest of us might mutually agree on as being generally acceptable .
It ’ s up Citizens to let them know that the ‘ safe ’ choice isn ’ t always the safe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ politicians to put up or shut up… or pay a price at the polls .
They must lay out , in explicit detail , something better than the bumper-sticker aphorisms they ’ ve been churning out .
Give us a specific ( and compelling ) rationale why you are absolutely CERTAIN that putting the government ’ s boot on the neck of our economy serves a meaningful larger purpose , how much longer you expect this ‘ fifteen days to flatten the curve ’ to last and what the ‘ exit plan ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can ’ t do that ?
Then get the hell out of our way .
Because we ’ ve got work to do .

It all goes back to the foundational reasons behind the rights.
If you ask around, why do we have the right to bear arms, you could almost get a different answer every time you ask it.
Gun-grabbers will probably trot out their usual smug dig about ‘overcompensating’ for a specifically masculine shortcoming. Or they might drop in their favorite made-up word, ‘ammosexual’. Those are unserious people and can be dismissed as such.
More thoughtful answers will center around the practical uses of the gun itself.
Avid hunters might prioritize putting the bam to Bambi in their answer.
Others might prioritize home defense. ‘When seconds count, the police are minutes away.’
Others might have the Minutemen in mind. ‘Sic semper tyrannis’.
America was a nation forged by individuals taking a stand against a global power to defend their personal rights from tyrannical rule — and many will gladly do so again if it becomes necessary.
Here are a few of the Founders’ and Framers’ thoughts on the Second Amendment specifically, (and rights more generally):
No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms [within his own lands or tenements].
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms… disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.
[See the rest of the list these were lifted from, here.]
That last point about the laws of nature is key to this discussion.
For gun ownership, the law of nature argument is simple. It goes something like this:
At no time does a man forfeit the right to protect his life from that which may threaten it.
This framing of the question takes us beyond specific application arguments to the broader principle upon which gun ownership is founded, and moves it into the realm of ‘laws of nature’, mentioned above.
Certain specific conditions might disqualify a person from lawful gun ownership, but his natural state is liberty until the State can show just cause otherwise.
Then the other reasons follow.
A gun helps a free citizen to defend himself against wild animals. Or defend his home and person against burglars and criminals with violent intent. Or defend his freedom against tyrants who would rob him of it.
Hunting falls in this same argument. It is the means by which a hunter can defend his family from hunger and want.
And unless that hunter has done something to disqualify him from owning a firearm to do so, he has a right to use his firearm to feed his family, so long as various conservation laws are heeded.
And that’s where we see the parallel to the Back To Work protests.
Whether we see Shelly Luther opening her nail salon, Elon Musk reopening Tesla, Doctor Hotze leading a back-to-work rebellion, or a desperate-to-survive Colorado restauranteur reopening her restaurant for Mothers’ day, Americans are waking up to an old idea.
Some rights are theirs by birth, whether the government likes it or not. And that includes the right to put food on your table through any lawful employment.
If a government wants to stand in the way of that right, they’d better produce a damned compelling reason, because the burden of proof is on their reasons to block our rights, NOT on ours to exercise them.
And the evidence for the protracted ‘pause’ in the lives of millions of Americans who want nothing more sinister than to simply put food on their kids’ tables is looking less and less justifiable as time goes on.
Politicians are scared to take a chance at being wrong.
Most fear the panic-mongering press and would rather destroy lives and livelihoods under the cover of ‘abundance of caution’ than trusting their fellow Americans to take risks the rest of us might mutually agree on as being generally acceptable.
It’s up Citizens to let them know that the ‘safe’ choice isn’t always the safe choice. The onus is on the politicians to put up or shut up… or pay a price at the polls.
They must lay out, in explicit detail, something better than the bumper-sticker aphorisms they’ve been churning out.
Give us a specific (and compelling) rationale why you are absolutely CERTAIN that putting the government’s boot on the neck of our economy serves a meaningful larger purpose, how much longer you expect this ‘fifteen days to flatten the curve’ to last and what the ‘exit plan’ back to normalcy looks like…
If you can’t do that? Then get the hell out of our way. Because we’ve got work to do.


clashdaily--2020-05-12--Kamala Harris Reported To Be Top Contestant In The Biden ‘Running Mate’ Pageant

Apparently , verbally shivving your former-opponent onstage during a debate isn ’ t enough to burn the bridge to become the Vice Presidential candidate .
Former Vice President Joe Biden , the presumptive nominee , is considering who will join him on the Democratic ticket .
Democrats , who have embraced whole-heartedly identity politics and Joe Biden has had to do the same .
With the defeat of Hillary Clinton in 2016 and the rise of the Old , White Men™ in 2020 , Joe has to ensure that the vocal , female demographic is appeased .
He ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ running mate .
It ’ s a wee bit sexist , but that doesn ’ t matter–after all , he is a Democrat .
The race to become Biden ’ s running mate has already been pretty weird–between failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams ’ s shameless self-promotion , Pocahontas Warren ’ s quiet lobbying and the promise that she could ramp up her small-donation fundraising machine , and the news that Michigan ’ s dictator , Gretchen “ No Seeds For You !
” Whitmer , is also in the running , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very strange .
Those are just a handful of the candidates .
A number of names have been floated–some of them household names as well as some lesser-known entities such as Nevada Senator Catherine Cortez Masto and the Governor of New Mexico , Michelle Lujan Grisham .
The candidates have been parading themselves trying to put their best foot forward , and–it all seems a bit…fake .
And yet , familiar .
It ’ s a bit like the worst beauty pageant that you ’ ve ever seen where contestants aren ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intelligence , or ability , but by what intersectional boxes they can tick off and how well they are the right complement to the candidate .
As long as there ’ s no swimsuit competition , I think we ’ re good .
At first , it was looking like Liz Warren was the clear favorite–but soon Joe was being warned by donors to not choose her .
Besides , President Trump had essentially endorsed her , so that meant that Democrats would have their knee-jerk reaction to simply oppose what Trump has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kamala Harris has jumped to the front of the pack despite how she humiliated him on the debate stage some time ago .
That ’ s because the right choice for an “ old white man ” is a “ young , woman of color.
” She must feel so special knowing that it ’ s a quirk of genetics that has thrust her into this position rather than her ability , political acumen , or that she is indeed the most qualified for the job .
Harris could be the Vice Presidential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It ’ as all so very progressive to judge someone by the color of their skin rather than by the content of their character .
According to POLITICO , Harris is now a serious contender .
“ Biden aides , surrogates , and major donors see her as the best fit ” to join him at the top of the ticket .
Influential donors see that her qualifications as a “ woman of color ” have put her way ahead of the competition according to influential Democrat donors , “ the daughter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the most logical choice to balance a ticket led by a white man in his late 70s.
” Biden and his family were stung by the June debate exchange over his record on school busing .
The attack was particularly hurtful because of Harris ’ bond with Biden ’ s late son Beau , also a one-time state attorney general .
But Biden and others close to him have come to view Harris ’ debate knockdown as part of the rough and tumble of presidential campaigning .
Even before Harris ended her own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Biden were already stealing warm moments together .
And friends of former second lady Jill Biden — who as recently as March described Harris ’ attack as a “ punch to the gut ” — said they ’ ve mulled ways for her to telegraph that it wasn ’ t a deal breaker for the California senator ’ s chances , perhaps by sharing her posts on social media .
“ I believe strongly that people make mistakes when they allow the heat of a political campaign and things said during a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jim Clyburn ( D-S.C. ) told POLITICO .
“ We ’ re at a point now where whoever was part of the scrimmage needs to be on the same team .
And I think they are .
“ Joe Biden is a big boy , ” Clyburn added .
“ I ’ ve never seen Joe have any animus toward Kamala for what may have been said during the campaign.
” This is unbelievably hilarious–we ’ ve got a man “ credibly accused ” of sexual assault and a vast history of creepy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , possibly choosing a woman who slept her way into politics in order to run a “ moral ” campaign against President Trump .
How is that gon na work , exactly ?
In this MeToo era , Democrats are looking like damned hypocrites for willing to toss aside their ridiculous “ Believe All Women ” standard that was adopted during the Kavanaugh confirmation circus in order to embrace the Title IX advocate , Joe Biden .
Kamala Harris is a very interesting choice to be Joe Biden ’ s running mate .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , political hack who couldn ’ t seem to gain enough traction in the Primary race to crack the single-digits in polls despite the number of intersectional boxes that she ticks and the giggly Media ( D ) cheering her on .
Her attempts to be “ cool ” are just cringe-inducing , and her fake cackle is even worse .
This is the winning ticket for Democrats ?
• Who Will Joe Pick As A Running Mate ?
The Women On His Short List Are Committed To ‘ Believe All Women ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kamala Harris – Stick A Fork In Him • President Trump Says That Biden ‘ Owes ’ Elizabeth Warren And Should Make Her His Running Mate • JOECHELLE ?
Biden Says That He Would Take Michelle Obama As His Running Mate ‘ In A Heartbeat ’ • Stacey Abrams Is The PERFECT Running Mate For Joe Biden–Just Ask Her !
• Hey CNN : Biden ’ s Campaign Advisor Memory-Holed All Her MeToo Tweets — Is That News ?
• Joe Biden ’ s Defense Of Title IX As He ’ s Accused @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Apparently, verbally shivving your former-opponent onstage during a debate isn’t enough to burn the bridge to become the Vice Presidential candidate.
Former Vice President Joe Biden, the presumptive nominee, is considering who will join him on the Democratic ticket.
Democrats, who have embraced whole-heartedly identity politics and Joe Biden has had to do the same. With the defeat of Hillary Clinton in 2016 and the rise of the Old, White Men™ in 2020, Joe has to ensure that the vocal, female demographic is appeased. He’s doing that by insisting on a female running mate. It’s a wee bit sexist, but that doesn’t matter–after all, he is a Democrat.
The race to become Biden’s running mate has already been pretty weird–between failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams’s shameless self-promotion, Pocahontas Warren’s quiet lobbying and the promise that she could ramp up her small-donation fundraising machine, and the news that Michigan’s dictator, Gretchen “No Seeds For You!” Whitmer, is also in the running, it’s all been very, very strange. Those are just a handful of the candidates. A number of names have been floated–some of them household names as well as some lesser-known entities such as Nevada Senator Catherine Cortez Masto and the Governor of New Mexico, Michelle Lujan Grisham.
The candidates have been parading themselves trying to put their best foot forward, and–it all seems a bit…fake. And yet, familiar.
It’s a bit like the worst beauty pageant that you’ve ever seen where contestants aren’t judged on their beauty, poise, intelligence, or ability, but by what intersectional boxes they can tick off and how well they are the right complement to the candidate.
As long as there’s no swimsuit competition, I think we’re good.
If you think that this is an unfair and sexist characterization of Biden’s hunt for a running mate, well, here’s what the New York Times reported today:
It is not lost on Mr. Biden that whomever he chooses might well be elected the nation’s first female president after his turn, or at least become a new front-runner for the distinction. He has called himself a “bridge” to the next generation of Democratic leaders, a transitional figure whose chief goal is the removal of President Trump. That Mr. Biden is a 77-year-old man likely to accept the nomination during a pandemic has attached even weightier stakes to his decision. In private encounters before this campaign, Mr. Biden has likened running-mate evaluation to deciding among calendar models, with three broad categories (and outdated honorifics): Contenders can be a “Mr. August” (a shot of momentum in the summer), a “Mr. October” (a reliable and effective campaigner for the fall) or a “Mr. January” (a governing partner, politics notwithstanding). Source: New York Times
I see your “binders full of women” attack and raise you “calendar models with three broad categories.” At best, Joe is calling to mind the big-haired, pouty woman in Daisy Dukes and a painted-on halter-top that adorn the wall calendar in a 1980s mechanic’s shop in any Hollywood flick from that era revealing the apparent sexism of grease-monkeys. It’s all very classy stuff.
Of course, if we go by his own behavior, Biden’s categories would extend past gender and race to likely include how soft his running mate’s skin is and how great her hair smells.
At first, it was looking like Liz Warren was the clear favorite–but soon Joe was being warned by donors to not choose her. Besides, President Trump had essentially endorsed her, so that meant that Democrats would have their knee-jerk reaction to simply oppose what Trump has said.
Now, it seems that Kamala Harris has jumped to the front of the pack despite how she humiliated him on the debate stage some time ago. That’s because the right choice for an “old white man” is a “young, woman of color.”
She must feel so special knowing that it’s a quirk of genetics that has thrust her into this position rather than her ability, political acumen, or that she is indeed the most qualified for the job. Harris could be the Vice Presidential nominee simply because of her melanin production. It’as all so very progressive to judge someone by the color of their skin rather than by the content of their character.
According to POLITICO, Harris is now a serious contender. “Biden aides, surrogates, and major donors see her as the best fit” to join him at the top of the ticket. Influential donors see that her qualifications as a “woman of color” have put her way ahead of the competition according to influential Democrat donors, “the daughter of immigrants from India and Jamaica as the most logical choice to balance a ticket led by a white man in his late 70s.”
Biden and his family were stung by the June debate exchange over his record on school busing. The attack was particularly hurtful because of Harris’ bond with Biden’s late son Beau, also a one-time state attorney general. But Biden and others close to him have come to view Harris’ debate knockdown as part of the rough and tumble of presidential campaigning. Even before Harris ended her own campaign last year, aides said she and Biden were already stealing warm moments together. And friends of former second lady Jill Biden — who as recently as March described Harris’ attack as a “punch to the gut” — said they’ve mulled ways for her to telegraph that it wasn’t a deal breaker for the California senator’s chances, perhaps by sharing her posts on social media. “I believe strongly that people make mistakes when they allow the heat of a political campaign and things said during a contest to define you,” Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) told POLITICO. “We’re at a point now where whoever was part of the scrimmage needs to be on the same team. And I think they are. “Joe Biden is a big boy,” Clyburn added. “I’ve never seen Joe have any animus toward Kamala for what may have been said during the campaign.” Source: POLITICO
This is unbelievably hilarious–we’ve got a man “credibly accused” of sexual assault and a vast history of creepy, predatory behavior with women and girls, possibly choosing a woman who slept her way into politics in order to run a “moral” campaign against President Trump. How is that gonna work, exactly?
In this MeToo era, Democrats are looking like damned hypocrites for willing to toss aside their ridiculous “Believe All Women” standard that was adopted during the Kavanaugh confirmation circus in order to embrace the Title IX advocate, Joe Biden.
Kamala Harris is a very interesting choice to be Joe Biden’s running mate. She’s a preening, lecturing, political hack who couldn’t seem to gain enough traction in the Primary race to crack the single-digits in polls despite the number of intersectional boxes that she ticks and the giggly Media(D) cheering her on. Her attempts to be “cool” are just cringe-inducing, and her fake cackle is even worse.
This is the winning ticket for Democrats?
Good luck with that, Dems!
Related:


clashdaily--2020-05-12--China’s Newest Anti-US Policy Could Derail KEY Medical Research, Including COVID Vaccine

In case you actually needed another reason to realize that China is NOT our friend and has ZERO intention of ‘ playing nice ’ … here you go .
While the global body count for a disease they unleashed on the world rises , they are messing with the supply chain again .
The PHARMACEUTICAL supply chain .
American pharmaceutical companies based in China have been forbidden to bring their own monkeys out of the country .
The Chinese Communist Party ( CCP ) is impeding United States research into COVID-19 by recently adopting a policy to deny the exportation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ essential in the development of vaccines and treatments for the disease , SaraACarter.com has learned .
China ’ s actions come on the heels of evidence from U.S. intelligence , which suggests the communist government is mounting a series of intense hacking efforts to steal U.S. advances in coronavirus therapies and research .
The cynomolgus macaques , also known as the crab-eating macaque monkey , are owned by the American pharmaceutical companies in China but the new CCP policy is prohibiting the ability to export the monkeys outside of the country .
Matthew @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Association for Biomedical Research , noted that the monkeys played a key role in new treatments for cancer , cancer drugs , research into hepatitis C , and rare diseases that affect the nervous system .
This new CCP policy has directly threatened necessary biomedical research , said Bailey , who has pleaded directly to U.S .
Ambassador to China Terry Branstad , as well as directly with President Donald Trump to address the matter .
Moreover , last week , Bailey put in a request for a White House meeting on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speak directly with Chinese President Xi Jinping , he said .
“ Every day that goes by that a researcher goes without the resources that they need we go without a treatment or cure for COVID-19 , more people are going to die , ” Bailey told this reporter on Saturday .
“ It ’ s critically important that the researchers have access…We ’ re quickly facing a crisis if this doesn ’ t get fixed .
When you ’ re in the middle of a research project you can ’ t switch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monkey has been used in many successful clinical trials for humans.
” “ It ’ s entirely possible that this is administrative non-sense , ” he said , referring to the Chinese government ’ s bureaucratic block on the monkeys .
“ But the fact that the U.S .
Ambassador raised the issue with the Chinese government is concerning because nothing has changed .
It raises the question whether this is administrative or stonewalling ?
The bigger question is why ?
” — SaraACarter The monkeys already belong to US companies .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And suddenly , with the stroke of a pen , they cut that research off .
It ’ s time the Press stops looking for ways to maximize damage on Trump and look for the real malicious intent .
Of course , with so many members of the press financially entangled with China , do any of them still remember how to be critical of their benefactor ?
Courageously ‘ Speaking truth to power ’ is so much easier when there isn ’ t a price to pay , isn ’ t it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of cowardice that lets Xi continue with his various abuses — foreign and domestic .
Remember when everyone mocked Trump for saying we needed to rethink our trade arrangement with China ?
After everything that ’ s happened since is anyone still mocking him now ?

In case you actually needed another reason to realize that China is NOT our friend and has ZERO intention of ‘playing nice’… here you go.
While the global body count for a disease they unleashed on the world rises, they are messing with the supply chain again. The PHARMACEUTICAL supply chain.
American pharmaceutical companies based in China have been forbidden to bring their own monkeys out of the country.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is impeding United States research into COVID-19 by recently adopting a policy to deny the exportation of monkeys used for research that are essential in the development of vaccines and treatments for the disease, SaraACarter.com has learned. China’s actions come on the heels of evidence from U.S. intelligence, which suggests the communist government is mounting a series of intense hacking efforts to steal U.S. advances in coronavirus therapies and research. The cynomolgus macaques, also known as the crab-eating macaque monkey, are owned by the American pharmaceutical companies in China but the new CCP policy is prohibiting the ability to export the monkeys outside of the country. Matthew Bailey, the president of the National Association for Biomedical Research, noted that the monkeys played a key role in new treatments for cancer, cancer drugs, research into hepatitis C, and rare diseases that affect the nervous system. This new CCP policy has directly threatened necessary biomedical research, said Bailey, who has pleaded directly to U.S. Ambassador to China Terry Branstad, as well as directly with President Donald Trump to address the matter. Moreover, last week, Bailey put in a request for a White House meeting on the critical matter and has asked Trump to speak directly with Chinese President Xi Jinping, he said. “Every day that goes by that a researcher goes without the resources that they need we go without a treatment or cure for COVID-19, more people are going to die,” Bailey told this reporter on Saturday. “It’s critically important that the researchers have access…We’re quickly facing a crisis if this doesn’t get fixed. When you’re in the middle of a research project you can’t switch horses midstream – this ‘cyno’ monkey has been used in many successful clinical trials for humans.” “It’s entirely possible that this is administrative non-sense,” he said, referring to the Chinese government’s bureaucratic block on the monkeys. “But the fact that the U.S. Ambassador raised the issue with the Chinese government is concerning because nothing has changed. It raises the question whether this is administrative or stonewalling? The bigger question is why?” — SaraACarter
The monkeys already belong to US companies. They are already being used for research. And suddenly, with the stroke of a pen, they cut that research off.
It’s time the Press stops looking for ways to maximize damage on Trump and look for the real malicious intent.
Of course, with so many members of the press financially entangled with China, do any of them still remember how to be critical of their benefactor?
Courageously ‘Speaking truth to power’ is so much easier when there isn’t a price to pay, isn’t it?
That’s exactly the kind of cowardice that lets Xi continue with his various abuses — foreign and domestic.
Remember when everyone mocked Trump for saying we needed to rethink our trade arrangement with China?
After everything that’s happened since is anyone still mocking him now?


clashdaily--2020-05-12--WATCH: Inmates In L.A. County Jail Share Water Bottle, Rub The Same Mask On Their Faces To Contract

WATCH: Inmates In L.A. County Jail Share Water Bottle, Rub The Same Mask On Their Faces To Contract COVID To Force Their Release

Many of them are in prison precisely BECAUSE they are opportunistic and prey on perceived weakness .
Why should this tactic surprise literally anybody ?
You ’ ve heard the phrase ‘ one man ’ s trash is another man ’ s treasure ’ ?
There are a wide variety of applications to that little proverb .
In this case what most people do NOT want , but is valuable to this group of people is a get out of jail free card .
COVID is very scary .
For some people .
But apart from the handful of people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been proven to be a comparatively minor illness for anyone who is otherwise medically uncompromised .
There are a lot of people not terribly worried about contracting it .
Especially if the benefits of contracting it might outweigh the risks .
And since all of human existence is a complex balancing act of risk versus reward , of immediate gain versus long-term benefit , some inmates have found a way to use the public fears of this illness as their very own get-out-of-jail-free card .
Watch these guys sharing water bottles and masks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sure what the endgame was .
Early release ?
A lawsuit against the jail for getting infected ?
Get the guards infected and cause staffing chaos ?
Some other motivation ?
Who knows , really ?
Seeing how many inmates have been released from prison due to the simple fear of COVID , it ’ s probably just a case of playing on the fears and humanity of people running the jails who might otherwise look like they are responsible for ‘ endangering ’ inmates with this ‘ dread disease ’ .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these guys are deliberately exposing themselves to the disease .
Whatever their end game was , as far as their short-term goal of getting infected ?
Mission accomplished — 21 took ill with CCP Coronavirus .

Many of them are in prison precisely BECAUSE they are opportunistic and prey on perceived weakness. Why should this tactic surprise literally anybody?
You’ve heard the phrase ‘one man’s trash is another man’s treasure’? There are a wide variety of applications to that little proverb. In this case what most people do NOT want, but is valuable to this group of people is a get out of jail free card.
COVID is very scary. For some people.
But apart from the handful of people with underlying conditions, it’s been proven to be a comparatively minor illness for anyone who is otherwise medically uncompromised.
There are a lot of people not terribly worried about contracting it. Especially if the benefits of contracting it might outweigh the risks.
And since all of human existence is a complex balancing act of risk versus reward, of immediate gain versus long-term benefit, some inmates have found a way to use the public fears of this illness as their very own get-out-of-jail-free card.
Watch these guys sharing water bottles and masks for deliberate exposure.
NEW: The LA County Sheriff says video surveillance shows inmates at a jail in Castaic sharing a water bottle, then rubbing the same mask on their faces to purposely infect themselves w/ #COVID19 because they thought it would force their release. 21 ended up infected. @FOXLA pic.twitter.com/7XuqSM7OXY — Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) May 11, 2020
Who knows for sure what the endgame was.
Early release? A lawsuit against the jail for getting infected? Get the guards infected and cause staffing chaos? Some other motivation?
Who knows, really? Seeing how many inmates have been released from prison due to the simple fear of COVID, it’s probably just a case of playing on the fears and humanity of people running the jails who might otherwise look like they are responsible for ‘endangering’ inmates with this ‘dread disease’.
But they got busted. The video shows these guys are deliberately exposing themselves to the disease.
Whatever their end game was, as far as their short-term goal of getting infected? Mission accomplished — 21 took ill with CCP Coronavirus.


clashdaily--2020-05-12--This Isn’t a Public Health Problem

This Isn’t a Public Health Problem

We were told that the police have to force us to behave certain ways because of a public health emergency .
That doesn ’ t make sense .
The actions of our politicians don ’ t match their words .
• If cops who are not wearing a mask , arrest you for not wearing a mask , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If we release violent criminals from jail , and then jail peaceful shop owners , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If you ’ re standing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arrest you for not social distancing , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If police threaten to give tickets to a husband and wife because they are sitting next to each other in public , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If police ticket couples who are driving together during a mandatory lockdown , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If you can walk on the beach , but you ’ ll get arrested for sitting down on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t a public health problem .
• If you can walk on the beach , but can ’ t swim alone , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If you can go to the beach , but you can ’ t fish from the shore , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If churches are closed but abortion centers are open , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If people die of preventable causes because we shut down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t a public health problem .
• If the liquor store clerk can serve thousands of people a day , but you can ’ t open your business for a few dozen customers , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If golf courses are open , but shooting ranges are closed , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If the grocery clerk can see over a thousand people a day , but your priest can only have 9 other people his his church @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public health problem .
• If the court is open for marriage or divorce , but not to renew your concealed carry permit , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If counties who shelter in place have the same death rate as counties who don ’ t , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If we treat counties that have never seen a death from Covid-19 the same way we treat New York City , then this isn ’ t a public health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people back to nursing homes , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If politicians demand help , and then refuse to use emergency hospitals staffed by volunteers , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If you ’ re told to socially isolate even after you ’ ve had covid-19 and are now immune from it , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
• If politicians say we shouldn ’ t jail people for disobeying the regulations that the politician @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t a public health problem .
• If politicians go to the gym , go get their hair cut , and go to a nail salon , but you can ’ t , then this isn ’ t a public health problem .
We have a political problem during an epidemic , but not because of the epidemic .
Politicians want to control you .
Please get off the couch and solve it , or we won ’ t have a country by the November elections .
Give your elected representatives a call @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I gave you 500 words .
Please share them with a friend and leave a comment .
RM

We were told that the police have to force us to behave certain ways because of a public health emergency. That doesn’t make sense. The actions of our politicians don’t match their words.
If cops who are not wearing a mask, arrest you for not wearing a mask, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If we release violent criminals from jail, and then jail peaceful shop owners, then this isn’t a public health problem.
Salon owner Shelley Luther. (AP Photo/LM Otero)
If you’re standing alone and cops gather around you to arrest you for not social distancing, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If police threaten to give tickets to a husband and wife because they are sitting next to each other in public, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If police ticket couples who are driving together during a mandatory lockdown, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If you can walk on the beach, but you’ll get arrested for sitting down on the beach, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If you can walk on the beach, but can’t swim alone, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If you can go to the beach, but you can’t fish from the shore, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If churches are closed but abortion centers are open, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If people die of preventable causes because we shut down our hospitals, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If the liquor store clerk can serve thousands of people a day, but you can’t open your business for a few dozen customers, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If golf courses are open, but shooting ranges are closed, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If the grocery clerk can see over a thousand people a day, but your priest can only have 9 other people his his church, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If the court is open for marriage or divorce, but not to renew your concealed carry permit, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If counties who shelter in place have the same death rate as counties who don’t, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If we treat counties that have never seen a death from Covid-19 the same way we treat New York City, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If politicians send sick people back to nursing homes, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If politicians demand help, and then refuse to use emergency hospitals staffed by volunteers, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If you’re told to socially isolate even after you’ve had covid-19 and are now immune from it, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If politicians say we shouldn’t jail people for disobeying the regulations that the politician just wrote, then this isn’t a public health problem.
If politicians go to the gym, go get their hair cut, and go to a nail salon, but you can’t, then this isn’t a public health problem.
We have a political problem during an epidemic, but not because of the epidemic. Politicians want to control you. Please get off the couch and solve it, or we won’t have a country by the November elections.
Give your elected representatives a call today, and demand your freedom.
Let us go.
~_~_
I gave you 500 words. Please share them with a friend and leave a comment. RM


clashdaily--2020-05-12--China: Friend Or Foe

China: Friend Or Foe

Virus from China … help or horror ?
Being in self-imposed lockdown and only going out for essential shopping ( mask and gloves on ) has made me think about some things during this odd time .
Politics , of course , will continue its march no matter what the world is going through .
There are those that have been “ bold ” enough to compare our locking-down experience to a preview of a Socialist government .
I don ’ t know about that .
On the surface it appears to be a logical comparison and I ’ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the stores .
There were entire aisles of empty shelves and , having seen similar photos from other Socialist countries , it ’ s a verifiable comparison .
Now , on the other hand , the lockdown MAY have saved hundreds of thousands of lives that would otherwise have been lost .
Perhaps , and we ’ ll never really know , if Belgium didn ’ t act as if their government heads were up their nether regions , many more people might have been saved .
This supreme culmination of the ineptitude @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found online on the personal website of Health Minister Maggie De Block : “ Wearing masks to protect yourself from the coronavirus makes little sense ” .
So , there were no masks , the government decided to announce that no masks were needed .
Was this a rational move on the part of the government ?
Many people were left to die in nursing homes , and that has been Belgium ’ s situation in the middle of the worst pandemic since the Spanish Influenza of 1918 .
This Belgian carnage is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Belgian governing “ elites ” — and was completely avoidable .
It is too soon to make a final assessment on the management of COVID-19 by the countries of the world , but one thing is sure : Belgium is in the middle of a great carnage .
China is going to go down in history as one of the great horror stories of the 21st Century .
According to Radio Free Asia , local Wuhan residents routinely heard screams coming from inside the several funeral crematoriums as patients were being burned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in that city .
Burned alive !
Stories coming out of China , when they are successfully smuggled out , are absolutely blood-curdling and I would be remiss if I didn ’ t compare them to the Nazi extermination programs .
RFA ( Radio Free Asia ) quoted a source “ close to the funeral industry ” identified only as Ma who said that he had heard reports of “ people restrained and forced into body bags when they were still moving.
” “ Some people are saying that … there are video @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , from inside the furnaces … which tells us that some people were taken to the funeral homes while they were still alive , ” Ma added .
This , then , is a country with which we should NOT be doing business .
They have been quietly buying up America … land , businesses , even members of Congress , I believe , given their support for that country .
We should , as quickly as possible , sever relations with China , and make whatever plans necessary , to regain those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re more than a thorn in our side , they are a living entity that will bore into our body and kill us eventually .
As reported recently , in Spain , the Ministry of Health revealed that 640,000 coronavirus tests that it had purchased from a Chinese supplier were defective .
In addition , a further million coronavirus tests delivered to Spain on March 30 by another Chinese manufacturer were also defective .
The Czech news site iRozhlas reported that 300,000 coronavirus test kits delivered by China had an error rate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Interior had paid $ 2.1 million for the kits .
A spokesperson for a hospital in Dutch city of Eindhoven said that Chinese suppliers were selling “ a lot of junk… at high prices.
” Is anyone but me REALLY uncomfortable finding out about these sales of defective products ?
“ No .
10 [ the residence of the British prime minister ] believes China is seeking to build its economic power during the pandemic with ‘ predatory offers of help ’ to countries around the world.
” — The Daily Mail @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The brutal truth is that China seems to flout the normal rules of behavior in every area of life — from healthcare to trade and from currency manipulation to internal repression .
For too long , nations have lamely kowtowed to China in the desperate hope of winning trade deals .
But once we get clear of this terrible pandemic , it is imperative that we all rethink that relationship and put it on a much more balanced and honest basis.
” — Former UK Conservative Party leader Iain Duncan Smith .
Here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sends defective health materials to countries that have no bone to pick with them , for what HAS to be an attempt to reduce the population .
My theory is that China is on a course for world domination , both economic and militarily , and that reducing some of the populations of potential enemies , they may make it easier to conquer .
A growing number of countries are reporting that millions of pieces of medical equipment donated by , or purchased from , China to defeat the pandemic are defective and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ risk of alienating a lot of our “ friends ” , if I was President , all connections with China would immediately cease .
That would cause some Chinese reaction , I ’ m sure…but of what kind ?

Virus from China …
help or horror?
Being in self-imposed lockdown and only going out for essential shopping (mask and gloves on) has made me think about some things during this odd time. Politics, of course, will continue its march no matter what the world is going through. There are those that have been “bold” enough to compare our locking-down experience to a preview of a Socialist government. I don’t know about
that. On the surface it appears to be a logical comparison and I’m basing that observation on personal experience in the stores. There were entire aisles of empty shelves and, having seen similar photos from other Socialist countries, it’s a verifiable comparison. Now, on the other
hand, the lockdown MAY have saved hundreds of thousands of lives that would otherwise have been lost.
Perhaps, and we’ll never really know, if Belgium didn’t act as if their government heads were up their nether regions, many more people might have been saved. This supreme culmination of the ineptitude of the Belgian government still can be found online on the personal website of Health Minister Maggie De Block: “Wearing masks to protect yourself from the coronavirus makes little sense”. So, there were no masks, the government decided to announce that no masks were needed. Was this a rational move on the part of the government? Many people were left to die in nursing homes, and that has been Belgium’s situation in the middle of the worst pandemic since the Spanish Influenza of 1918. This Belgian carnage is entirely due to the tragic incompetence of the Belgian governing “elites” — and was completely avoidable. It is too soon to make a final assessment on the management of COVID-19 by the countries of the world, but one thing is sure: Belgium is in the middle of a great carnage.
China is going to go down in history as one of the great horror stories of the 21st Century. According to Radio Free Asia, local Wuhan residents routinely heard screams coming from inside the several funeral crematoriums as patients were being burned alive during the worst of the outbreak in that city. Burned alive! Stories coming out of China, when they are successfully smuggled out, are absolutely blood-curdling and I would be remiss if I didn’t compare them to the Nazi extermination programs. RFA(Radio Free Asia) quoted a source “close to the funeral industry” identified only as Ma who said that he had heard reports of “people restrained and forced into body bags when they were still moving.” “Some people are saying that … there are video clips of screams coming from funeral homes, from inside the furnaces … which tells us that some people were taken to the funeral homes while they were still alive,” Ma added.
This, then, is a country with which we should NOT be doing business. They have been quietly buying up America … land, businesses, even members of Congress, I believe, given their support for that country.
We should, as quickly as possible, sever relations with China, and make whatever plans necessary, to regain those properties they’ve bought. They’re more than a thorn in our side, they are a living entity that will bore into our body and kill us eventually.
As reported recently, in Spain, the Ministry of Health revealed that 640,000 coronavirus tests that it had purchased from a Chinese supplier were defective. In addition, a further million coronavirus tests delivered to Spain on March 30 by another Chinese manufacturer were also defective. The Czech news site iRozhlas reported that 300,000 coronavirus test kits delivered by China had an error rate of 80%. The Czech Ministry of Interior had paid $2.1 million for the kits.
A spokesperson for a hospital in Dutch city of Eindhoven said that Chinese suppliers were selling “a lot of junk… at high prices.” Is anyone but me REALLY uncomfortable finding out about these sales of defective products? “No. 10 [the residence of the British prime minister] believes China is seeking to build its economic power during the pandemic with ‘predatory offers of help’ to countries around the world.” — The Daily Mail, March 28, 2020.
“The brutal truth is that China seems to flout the normal rules of behavior in every area of life — from healthcare to trade and from currency manipulation to internal repression. For too long, nations have lamely kowtowed to China in the desperate hope of winning trade deals. But once we get clear of this terrible pandemic, it is imperative that we all rethink that relationship and put it on a much more balanced and honest basis.” — Former UK Conservative Party leader Iain Duncan Smith. Here we have solid evidence that China deliberately sends defective health materials to countries that have no bone to pick with them, for what HAS to be an attempt to reduce the population. My theory is that China is on a course for world domination, both economic and militarily, and that reducing some of the populations of potential enemies, they may make it easier to conquer. A growing number of countries are reporting that millions of pieces of medical equipment donated by, or purchased from, China to defeat the pandemic are defective and unusable.
Parting shot: At the risk of alienating a lot of our “friends”, if I was President, all connections with China would immediately cease. That would cause some Chinese reaction, I’m sure…but of what kind?


clashdaily--2020-05-12--Jimmy Kimmel’s Apology For ‘Deceptive Video’ Includes Claim ‘Lunatic’ MAGA Hats Are Threatening Him

Do you believe him , or is this a Jussie Smollett-level hoax ?
First of all , Jimmy Kimmel is a sad , pathetic excuse for a late-night talk show host .
He ’ s not even really doing comedy anymore , it ’ s all political commentary as he looks down his nose at the “ lunatics ” that could possibly have an opinion that diverges from his own enlightened worldview .
He ’ s a one-trick pony with a single joke that his left-tilting audience finds hilarious–mock the President and the rubes that support him .
Kimmel is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Stewart without the wit , comedic timing , or likeability .
Kimmel has no humor , no creativity , and no balls to step up and actually admit that he ’ s wrong on occasion .
He deserves every scathing word of mockery that he gets .
He does not , however , ever deserve a threat of violence , let alone death threat .
He ’ s a stupid , loudmouth , jerk that has suddenly seen the light that women should be treated as human beings instead of just watching their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ jump on a trampoline , or feel what ’ s in his pocket .
Trending : Coronavirus Scam is about Power , Control and Money Late last week , Kimmel posted a video of Vice President Mike Pence allegedly caught on a “ hot mic ” saying that he was carrying empty boxes of personal protective equipment to an Alexandria , Virginia medical facility .
The thing is , the video mischaracterized the situation and the Vice President was making a joke .
FAKE NEWS : Jimmy Kimmel Posts Video Of V.P .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Of PPE–Journos Retweet It The video got Kimmel in a bit of a Twitter feud with the President and a public apology was requested by the Office of the Vice President .
It seems like a reasonable request since it was retweeted by the Serious Journalists™ and not just some pathetic , crying former comedians-turned-political commentators on late-night television .
He does have a pretty big audience and name recognition , after all .
That ’ s how the video spread in the first place .
Kimmel then went on to make his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump administration for spreading untruth is like apologizing to Barry Bonds for using steroids .
It ’ s hard.
” Kimmel joked .
“ But the outrage from the MAGA hats , the outpouring of venom , was disgusting .
Stupid too , but mostly disgusting .
Some of these lunatics have the audacity to use the word Christian in their bios , but that didn ’ t stop them from wishing death on me , on my family , on my son.
” It ’ s rather convenient that a bunch of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Christian ” in their bios are threatening him with violence .
I ’ m skeptical .
Of course , he couldn ’ t stop the digs .
Kimmel said , “ spreading misinformation is their thing and I stepped on their toes.
” He then went on to spout off on a whole lot of things that the Trump administration has lied about–but some of them have been debunked like the Charlottesville Hoax , the child separation policy that began under the Obama administration , and “ Russian collusion.
” But hey , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former-comedian who spreads disinformation to put a priority on truth and facts , do we ?
KIMMEL : We would like an apology for separating thousands of migrant children from their parents , inviting the Taliban to Camp David , siding with Vladimir Putin over U.S. intelligence , calling Neo-nazis ‘ very fine people , ’ using campaign money to pay off a porn star , mocking a 16-year-old climate activist , mocking Christine Blasey Ford , obstruction of justice , ignoring warnings on coronavirus , downplaying the dangers of coronavirus , mishandling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t have tests for the coronavirus , why are we opening the country when we have no tests for coronavirus ?
Apparently I ’ m not the only doubter that smells meatball on Italian herb and cheese .
I ’ d love to see who those MAGA supporters that threatened him were–chances are that they ’ re dummy accounts owned by libs trying to make Trump supporters look bad .
It ’ s not like that would be anything new , it ’ s literally the that Jussie Smollett and so many others @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jussie Smollett CHARGED With Federal Crime For Hoax Hate Attack — Here ’ s The COMPLETE Timeline BREAKING : Bi-Sexual Chick Said Trump Supporters Sent Her ANTI-GAY Slurs – Here ’ s What COPS Discovered DEAR CNN : The Jack @ ss That Made 8 BOMB Threats To Jewish Center Is A LIBERAL & A MUSLIM ANOTHER HOAX : Look Who Got Caught For ‘ White Supremacist ’ Hate Crime… HATE CRIME : College Student Arrested For ANTI-SEMITIC Graffiti After TRUMP Supporters Were BLAMED Black Chicks LIE About “ Hate Crime ” , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WICKEDLY Delicious Muslim Woman Admits to LYING About Fake Attack — Police Say She Was Slashed By… DEAR MEDIA BS ARTISTS : The Anti-Muslim Portland Stabber Is NOT A Trump Supporter – Here ’ s THE TRUTH FAKE HATE : Leftist Claiming She Was Attacked By A Trump Supporter — LIED

Do you believe him, or is this a Jussie Smollett-level hoax?
First of all, Jimmy Kimmel is a sad, pathetic excuse for a late-night talk show host. He’s not even really doing comedy anymore, it’s all political commentary as he looks down his nose at the “lunatics” that could possibly have an opinion that diverges from his own enlightened worldview. He’s a one-trick pony with a single joke that his left-tilting audience finds hilarious–mock the President and the rubes that support him. Kimmel is a cheap, dollar-store knock-off of Jon Stewart without the wit, comedic timing, or likeability.
Kimmel has no humor, no creativity, and no balls to step up and actually admit that he’s wrong on occasion. He deserves every scathing word of mockery that he gets.
He does not, however, ever deserve a threat of violence, let alone death threat. He’s a stupid, loudmouth, jerk that has suddenly seen the light that women should be treated as human beings instead of just watching their ta-tas bounce up and down as they jump on a trampoline, or feel what’s in his pocket.
Late last week, Kimmel posted a video of Vice President Mike Pence allegedly caught on a “hot mic” saying that he was carrying empty boxes of personal protective equipment to an Alexandria, Virginia medical facility. The thing is, the video mischaracterized the situation and the Vice President was making a joke.
ClashDaily covered that here:
FAKE NEWS: Jimmy Kimmel Posts Video Of V.P. Mike Pence Delivering ‘Empty Boxes’ Of PPE–Journos Retweet It
(We noted that we’re not surprised that Kimmel can no longer recognize a joke when he hears one.)
The video got Kimmel in a bit of a Twitter feud with the President and a public apology was requested by the Office of the Vice President. It seems like a reasonable request since it was retweeted by the Serious Journalists™ and not just some pathetic, crying former comedians-turned-political commentators on late-night television. He does have a pretty big audience and name recognition, after all. That’s how the video spread in the first place.
Kimmel then went on to make his public apology.
“Apologizing to the Trump administration for spreading untruth is like apologizing to Barry Bonds for using steroids. It’s hard.” Kimmel joked. “But the outrage from the MAGA hats, the outpouring of venom, was disgusting. Stupid too, but mostly disgusting. Some of these lunatics have the audacity to use the word Christian in their bios, but that didn’t stop them from wishing death on me, on my family, on my son.” Source: Mediaite
It’s rather convenient that a bunch of “lunatic” MAGA hats with “Christian” in their bios are threatening him with violence. I’m skeptical.
Of course, he couldn’t stop the digs. Kimmel said, “spreading misinformation is their thing and I stepped on their toes.”
He then went on to spout off on a whole lot of things that the Trump administration has lied about–but some of them have been debunked like the Charlottesville Hoax, the child separation policy that began under the Obama administration, and “Russian collusion.”
But hey, we don’t expect some lefty former-comedian who spreads disinformation to put a priority on truth and facts, do we?
KIMMEL: We would like an apology for separating thousands of migrant children from their parents, inviting the Taliban to Camp David, siding with Vladimir Putin over U.S. intelligence, calling Neo-nazis ‘very fine people,’ using campaign money to pay off a porn star, mocking a 16-year-old climate activist, mocking Christine Blasey Ford, obstruction of justice, ignoring warnings on coronavirus, downplaying the dangers of coronavirus, mishandling the coronavirus, we still don’t have tests for the coronavirus, why are we opening the country when we have no tests for coronavirus?
Apparently I’m not the only doubter that smells meatball on Italian herb and cheese.
Did he eat a subway sandwich right after this? https://t.co/PX207ALMNW — Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) May 12, 2020
I’d love to see who those MAGA supporters that threatened him were–chances are that they’re dummy accounts owned by libs trying to make Trump supporters look bad. It’s not like that would be anything new, it’s literally the that Jussie Smollett and so many others have been doing since November 2016.
Here’s a partial list of the fake hate:
Jussie Smollett CHARGED With Federal Crime For Hoax Hate Attack — Here’s The COMPLETE Timeline
BREAKING: Bi-Sexual Chick Said Trump Supporters Sent Her ANTI-GAY Slurs – Here’s What COPS Discovered
DEAR CNN: The Jack@ss That Made 8 BOMB Threats To Jewish Center Is A LIBERAL & A MUSLIM
ANOTHER HOAX: Look Who Got Caught For ‘White Supremacist’ Hate Crime…
HATE CRIME: College Student Arrested For ANTI-SEMITIC Graffiti After TRUMP Supporters Were BLAMED
Black Chicks LIE About “Hate Crime”, Karma Finds Them And It’s WICKEDLY Delicious
Muslim Woman Admits to LYING About Fake Attack — Police Say She Was Slashed By…
DEAR MEDIA BS ARTISTS: The Anti-Muslim Portland Stabber Is NOT A Trump Supporter – Here’s THE TRUTH
YES! NY Muslim Yasmin Seweid ARRESTED For Filing BOGUS ‘Islamaphobia Report’
FAKE HATE: Leftist Claiming She Was Attacked By A Trump Supporter — LIED


clashdaily--2020-05-12--WATCH: Michelle O. Says That Having Children Was A ‘Concession’ That Cost Her ‘Aspirations And Dream

WATCH: Michelle O. Says That Having Children Was A ‘Concession’ That Cost Her ‘Aspirations And Dreams’

Imagine how Malia and Sasha feel after hearing this !
Actually , it probably won ’ t shock them–after all , it was their dad that said in 2008 that he was pro-abortion because he didn ’ t want his daughters “ punished with a baby ” if they made a mistake .
Michelle Obama ’ s bestselling book Becoming has been turned into a Netflix special .
For some of us that are terrified of attempting to read something that was written by the former First Lady , perhaps checking out the Netflix special is the right move .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ find some clips online that were posted by others so that you don ’ t actually have to subject yourself to an entire Michelle Obama hagiography as narrated by the woman herself .
Trending : Coronavirus Scam is about Power , Control and Money Michelle has been praised for being incredibly candid in her biography .
This moment of honesty , however , was a bit too much for a special that premiered just a few days before Mother ’ s Day .
She says that the birth of the children put her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she “ made the concession ” and “ dialed back ” her aspirations and dreams in order to raise the two girls .
How a mother could say those things is completely beyond me .
Michelle admits that she couldn ’ t do it all , despite the lies of feminism saying that she could .
Gee , what happened ?
Was it a standard that is unattainable to the masses ?
The choices between motherhood and a career is made by millions of women all the time , but many of us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a stifling of who we are , but rather a call to be something better than we imagined–a mother .
Sure , there are tough times .
There are absolutely days of frustration , but whatever hardship , heartache , career or financial loss , many wouldn ’ t change a darned thing because their kids are worth the sacrifice .
It ’ s interesting that Michelle ’ s admission that she rather reluctantly made sacrifices to her dreams , and feels “ unequal ” to Barack because she became a mom , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was announced .
What does that have to do with anything ?
It has everything to do with it .
For some people , like Michelle , it seems that motherhood is viewed as a burden , but for others , it ’ s an unparalleled joy .
Case in point , Courtney Earl who , along with her husband , Russell , has built a family through adoption .
Their youngest adopted daughter , Magnolia , was just chosen as 2020 ’ s Gerber baby .
The Earls see the value of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Today Show accidentally allowed an adorable pro-life argument on national television in flesh and blood .
And it was such a beautiful thing , especially when Courtney Earl praised Magnolia ’ s birth parents for choosing life and the joy that they have for their little girl .
How different from the view of the Obamas that the unexpected baby is “ punishment ” that should just be exterminated like it ’ s a pest .
It ’ s telling .
It is utterly shocking to me that Michelle , who suffered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a miscarriage , would still view motherhood as some sort of second-place prize .
It would appear from her statements that , to Michelle , being a mother is work–likely described in those neo-Marxist feminist terms of “ unpaid labor.
” Although there were clearly some rewards for Michelle , the niggling feeling that she could have been more , achieved more , and be an accomplished woman separate from her identity with Barack , doesn ’ t seem to be far from her mind .
It ’ s sad , really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lady , that is well-respected and adored on the Left , and yet , she still seems to view herself as a failure for not being able to achieve the near-impossible standard held by modern feminists of “ having it all.
” Maybe , just maybe , not considering what women want from their lives and holding them to the same standards as men isn ’ t actually “ feminist ” at all .
Maybe it just makes some women feel like failures when they ’ re clearly not .

Imagine how Malia and Sasha feel after hearing this!
Actually, it probably won’t shock them–after all, it was their dad that said in 2008 that he was pro-abortion because he didn’t want his daughters “punished with a baby” if they made a mistake.
Michelle Obama’s bestselling book Becoming has been turned into a Netflix special. For some of us that are terrified of attempting to read something that was written by the former First Lady, perhaps checking out the Netflix special is the right move.
Or, you might get lucky and find some clips online that were posted by others so that you don’t actually have to subject yourself to an entire Michelle Obama hagiography as narrated by the woman herself.
Michelle has been praised for being incredibly candid in her biography. This moment of honesty, however, was a bit too much for a special that premiered just a few days before Mother’s Day.
She says that the birth of the children put her on unequal footing with Barack, and she “made the concession” and “dialed back” her aspirations and dreams in order to raise the two girls.
How a mother could say those things is completely beyond me.
Michelle admits that she couldn’t do it all, despite the lies of feminism saying that she could. Gee, what happened? Was it a standard that is unattainable to the masses?
The choices between motherhood and a career is made by millions of women all the time, but many of us don’t think of it as a stifling of who we are, but rather a call to be something better than we imagined–a mother. Sure, there are tough times. There are absolutely days of frustration, but whatever hardship, heartache, career or financial loss, many wouldn’t change a darned thing because their kids are worth the sacrifice.
It’s interesting that Michelle’s admission that she rather reluctantly made sacrifices to her dreams, and feels “unequal” to Barack because she became a mom, aired just as the latest Gerber baby was announced.
What does that have to do with anything?
It has everything to do with it.
For some people, like Michelle, it seems that motherhood is viewed as a burden, but for others, it’s an unparalleled joy.
Case in point, Courtney Earl who, along with her husband, Russell, has built a family through adoption. Their youngest adopted daughter, Magnolia, was just chosen as 2020’s Gerber baby.
It's official, the next #GerberBaby for 2020 is the adorable Magnolia Earl! She is Gerber's first adoptive spokes-baby, congratulations! pic.twitter.com/jDl7QpOYI4 — 3rd Hour of TODAY (@3rdHourTODAY) May 8, 2020
The Earls see the value of Magnolia’s life, and, the Today Show accidentally allowed an adorable pro-life argument on national television in flesh and blood. And it was such a beautiful thing, especially when Courtney Earl praised Magnolia’s birth parents for choosing life and the joy that they have for their little girl.
How different from the view of the Obamas that the unexpected baby is “punishment” that should just be exterminated like it’s a pest. It’s telling.
It is utterly shocking to me that Michelle, who suffered the devastating loss of a child due to a miscarriage, would still view motherhood as some sort of second-place prize.
It would appear from her statements that, to Michelle, being a mother is work–likely described in those neo-Marxist feminist terms of “unpaid labor.” Although there were clearly some rewards for Michelle, the niggling feeling that she could have been more, achieved more, and be an accomplished woman separate from her identity with Barack, doesn’t seem to be far from her mind.
It’s sad, really. Here we have a former First Lady, that is well-respected and adored on the Left, and yet, she still seems to view herself as a failure for not being able to achieve the near-impossible standard held by modern feminists of “having it all.”
Maybe, just maybe, not considering what women want from their lives and holding them to the same standards as men isn’t actually “feminist” at all. Maybe it just makes some women feel like failures when they’re clearly not.


clashdaily--2020-05-12--WATCH: Clinton Crony Turned ‘Serious Journalist’ Lets Joe Biden Call Tara Reade A Liar On National T

WATCH: Clinton Crony Turned ‘Serious Journalist’ Lets Joe Biden Call Tara Reade A Liar On National Television

Remember , this “ journalist ” called Bill Clinton ’ s predatory behavior a bunch of “ bimbo eruptions ” … and helped quash them .
How do we take this guy as a serious news anchor ?
And yet , here we are .
George Stephanopoulos , who was close with the Clintons and continues to be an absolute political hack , is the main news anchor at ABC .
Trending : Coronavirus Scam is about Power , Control and Money Wasn ’ t it ABC that squashed the Jeffrey Epstein story and then went after the person that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on camera ?
Oh , how strange .
Wasn ’ t it Stephanopoulos who was shocked–shocked , I tell you !
–that the Hillary campaign canceled an interview with Ronan Farrow allegedly over his exposé on serial Hollywood predator , Harvey Weinstein ?
That ’ s double strange considering that ’ s precisely the kind of thing that Stephanopoulos did to tamp down all those “ bimbo eruptions ” back when Bill was Governor of Arkansas with ambitions for the White House .
From his memoir “ All Too Human ” Stephanopoulos writes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s “ character witness ” and how morally gray and just plain icky that was : Some of these alleged “ bimbo eruptions ” weren ’ t consensual affairs–they were accusations of sexual assault , and , in the case of Juanita Broaddrick , rape .
But , here is Stephanopoulos , nearly 30 years later , and he ’ s got another Democrat nominee burdened with a woman alleging that he behaved in ungentlemanly conduct with her behind closed doors .
What ’ s the Serious Journalist™ going to do ?
Well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truth ” of course !
And on Good Morning America , no less .
Biden says that a woman should be believed , but he ’ s assuring everyone that the “ credible accusation ” just didn ’ t happen despite what Reade says .
Joe Biden basically called Tara Reade a liar on national television , just as he did when he was grilled by Mika Brzezinski , but this time , there wasn ’ t a smidgeon of pushback .
STEPHANOPOULOS : On these allegations from Tara Reade , I know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also said that women should be believed .
So , what do you say to Americans that believe Tara Reade and won ’ t vote for you because of it ?
BIDEN : Well , that ’ s their right .
Look , here–look , I think that women should be believed .
They should have an opportunity to have their case and state it just forthrightly–what their case is .
That ’ s the responsibility of responsible journalists , like you , and everyone else to investigate those .
At the end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the truth .
That ’ s what should prevail .
And the truth is , this never happened .
This never happened , I assure you .
STEPHANOPOULOS : Mr. Vice President , thank you for your time this morning .
What a coward and a hack to just let that go without a challenge !
An actual journalist would ask : • why Joe doesn ’ t “ believe ALL women ” when they come forward • why he flip-flopped on the standard that all women have an “ essence of truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sexual assault • if he should be held to the ridiculous Title IX standard that the Obama administration imposed on colleges • why he won ’ t release all of his political records • what he ’ s hiding in his political records It goes without saying that this interview would be a very different one if Joe had an “ R ” after his name instead of a “ D ” .
George Stephanopoulos isn ’ t a journalist , he ’ s a Democratic hack–just like the rest of them .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden ’ s Good Morning America appearance here :

Remember, this “journalist” called Bill Clinton’s predatory behavior a bunch of “bimbo eruptions”… and helped quash them.
How do we take this guy as a serious news anchor?
And yet, here we are.
George Stephanopoulos, who was close with the Clintons and continues to be an absolute political hack, is the main news anchor at ABC.
Wasn’t it ABC that squashed the Jeffrey Epstein story and then went after the person that leaked the Amy Robach video admitting it on camera? Oh, how strange.
Wasn’t it Stephanopoulos who was shocked–shocked, I tell you!–that the Hillary campaign canceled an interview with Ronan Farrow allegedly over his exposé on serial Hollywood predator, Harvey Weinstein?
That’s double strange considering that’s precisely the kind of thing that Stephanopoulos did to tamp down all those “bimbo eruptions” back when Bill was Governor of Arkansas with ambitions for the White House.
From his memoir “All Too Human” Stephanopoulos writes about his role as Bill Clinton’s “character witness” and how morally gray and just plain icky that was:
“I didn’t believe Clinton, and I couldn’t buy the party line — which meant I was the enemy now,” Stephanopoulos wrote. “I didn’t think I was a hypocrite, because my defense of Clinton against past bimbo eruptions had been predicated on my belief that he wouldn’t create new ones … For several years, I had served as Clinton’s character witness. Now I felt like a dupe.”
Some of these alleged “bimbo eruptions” weren’t consensual affairs–they were accusations of sexual assault, and, in the case of Juanita Broaddrick, rape.
But, here is Stephanopoulos, nearly 30 years later, and he’s got another Democrat nominee burdened with a woman alleging that he behaved in ungentlemanly conduct with her behind closed doors. What’s the Serious Journalist™ going to do?
Well, let the man share “his truth” of course! And on Good Morning America, no less. Biden says that a woman should be believed, but he’s assuring everyone that the “credible accusation” just didn’t happen despite what Reade says. Joe Biden basically called Tara Reade a liar on national television, just as he did when he was grilled by Mika Brzezinski, but this time, there wasn’t a smidgeon of pushback.
STEPHANOPOULOS: On these allegations from Tara Reade, I know you’ve denied them, but also said that women should be believed. So, what do you say to Americans that believe Tara Reade and won’t vote for you because of it?
BIDEN: Well, that’s their right. Look, here–look, I think that women should be believed. They should have an opportunity to have their case and state it just forthrightly–what their case is. That’s the responsibility of responsible journalists, like you, and everyone else to investigate those. At the end of the day, the truth is the truth. That’s what should prevail. And the truth is, this never happened. This never happened, I assure you.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Mr. Vice President, thank you for your time this morning.
“That’s their right,” former Vice Pres. Joe Biden says of people who choose not to vote for him because of Tara Reade’s allegations. “I think women should be believed … at the end of the day, the truth is the truth … this never happened.” https://t.co/m7Cp8PQBBH pic.twitter.com/e2N0Mw1jLY — ABC News (@ABC) May 12, 2020
What a coward and a hack to just let that go without a challenge!
An actual journalist would ask:
if he’s calling Tara Reade a liar
why Joe doesn’t “believe ALL women” when they come forward
what makes a woman’s accusation “credible”
why he flip-flopped on the standard that all women have an “essence of truth” when they make an accusation of sexual assault
if he should be held to the ridiculous Title IX standard that the Obama administration imposed on colleges
why he won’t release all of his political records
what he’s hiding in his political records
It goes without saying that this interview would be a very different one if Joe had an “R” after his name instead of a “D”.
George Stephanopoulos isn’t a journalist, he’s a Democratic hack–just like the rest of them.
You can watch the full clip of Biden’s Good Morning America appearance here:


clashdaily--2020-05-13--Tucker Carlson Lays Out DEVASTING Case Against Obama Administration’s Russiagate Corruption

So much for that ‘ scandal-free ’ administration .
The big question is who — if anyone — will take the fall ?
Obama is now clearly and directly implicated in the politics of personal destruction unleashed on General Flynn .
He knew .
He even knew more than underlings who OUGHT to have known .
That fits neatly with what Strzok and Page were saying about POTUS and the White House being directly involved in what they were since summer of 2016… during the election .
This isn ’ t just a little wrongdoing , this is flagrant and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ allies and hurt political foes .
Worse still , some of these same players already privately knew that Putin ’ s preferred candidate wasn ’ t Trump at all , but was actually Hillary Clinton .
That , of course , didn ’ t stop them from building up their lies against Trump .
And the lies were the foundation of a conspiracy which — as some have already described it — might one day make Watergate look like a parking ticket .
Ted Cruz makes this great point to sum it up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monologue is powerful & very much worth watching .
It explains in detail the bombshell revelation—which the media is desperately trying to ignore—that Obama PERSONALLY directed the FBI to target his political opponent @ realDonaldTrump This isn ’ t just Comey or Brennan going rogue… they were acting under the direct instruction of an outgoing president to hamstring an incoming president .
Obviously , Obama missed Hillary ’ s lecture on a ‘ smooth transition of power ’ .
And his wife ’ s one about ‘ when they go low , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that too ?
We ’ ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a less than stellar past , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

So much for that ‘scandal-free’ administration. The big question is who — if anyone — will take the fall?
Obama is now clearly and directly implicated in the politics of personal destruction unleashed on General Flynn. He knew. He even knew more than underlings who OUGHT to have known.
That fits neatly with what Strzok and Page were saying about POTUS and the White House being directly involved in what they were since summer of 2016… during the election.
This isn’t just a little wrongdoing, this is flagrant and corrupt abuse of power to help political allies and hurt political foes.
Worse still, some of these same players already privately knew that Putin’s preferred candidate wasn’t Trump at all, but was actually Hillary Clinton.
That, of course, didn’t stop them from building up their lies against Trump.
And the lies were the foundation of a conspiracy which — as some have already described it — might one day make Watergate look like a parking ticket.
Ted Cruz makes this great point to sum it up in a tweet:
This @TuckerCarlson monologue is powerful & very much worth watching. It explains in detail the bombshell revelation—which the media is desperately trying to ignore—that Obama PERSONALLY directed the FBI to target his political opponent @realDonaldTrump
That ‘personally’ part is a game-changer.
This isn’t just Comey or Brennan going rogue… they were acting under the direct instruction of an outgoing president to hamstring an incoming president.
Obviously, Obama missed Hillary’s lecture on a ‘smooth transition of power’.
And his wife’s one about ‘when they go low, we go high’.
What, missed that too?
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-05-13--FLYNN: Don’t Pop Any Corks Just Yet… Judge Just Threw A Wrench Into The Process

The judge who once scolded Flynn for being a ‘ traitor ’ did not dismiss the case after DOJ withdrew .
He did something else , instead .
He is inviting ‘ amicus ’ submissions on a freaking criminal trial .
The defendant has withdrawn his plea , claiming that he was pressured against his will to provide it… offering evidence of prosecutorial malfeasance that violated his rights in the process .
The DOJ has withdrawn their charges , agreeing with the Defendant that there was no lawful predicate upon which this case against General Flynn was built… and worse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the DOJ ’ s intent to entrap him .
It should be open-and-shut , right ?
Nope .
Not with the judge that once called the man even DOJ now calls innocent a ‘ traitor ’ .
He has taken the step of inviting amicus submissions .
D.C. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order Tuesday indicating he ’ ll soon accept “ amicus curiae , ” or “ friend of the court ” submissions , in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn — drawing immediate scrutiny and a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had previously refused to hear amicus briefs in the case .
Sullivan ’ s order indicated that an upcoming scheduling order would clarify the parameters of who specifically could submit the amicus briefs , which are submissions by non-parties that claim an interest in the case .
Sullivan specifically said he anticipated that “ individuals and organizations ” will file briefs “ for the benefit of the court , ” as he prepares to rule on the government ’ s motion to dismiss the case .
“ Judge Sullivan , who denied leave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ third parties would have spoken favorably of Flynn , now solicits briefs critical of Flynn , ” independent journalist Michael Cernovich wrote on Twitter Tuesday evening .
“ This is a violation of the judicial oath and applicable ethical rules .
We will be filing a complaint against Sullivan .
… [ He ] is acting as a politician , not a judge.
” Sullivan had previously held in the Flynn case that “ [ o ] ptions exist for a private citizen to express his views about matters of public interest , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not an available option.
” Will Chamberlain , a lawyer and the editor-in-chief of Human Events , noted that case law in the circuit generally prohibits trial court judges from second-guessing the government ’ s decision not to prosecute a defendant .
— FoxNews Turley had some interesting observations in a tweet thread .
Interesting development just in the Flynn case .
Judge Sullivan just issued an order saying “ at the appropriate time , the Court will enter an Order governing the submission of any amicus curiae briefs.
” That certainly does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ motion… …The Court is faced with an unopposed motion where the Justice Department no longer believes the case can be ethically prosecuted .
Judge Sullivan appears incline to bring in third parties to argue against an unopposed motion where the defendant and prosecutors agree… …It is hard to imagine the court insisting on sentencing a defendant to jail when prosecutors believe he was unjustly charged .
Ironically , Judge Sullivan made this motion easier due to the controversy over his prior sentencing hearing… …due to the controversy , Flynn opted not to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That left him unsentenced , which ironically made this motion easier .
Otherwise , Flynn would have faced a more difficult post-conviction motion while on appeal .
No amicus can change that record… Amicus can certainly add more heat but not light .
More importantly , it is unlikely to change the outcome .
I previously stated that I thought Judge Sullivan would call a hearing .
This appears to confirm that he is unlikely to go quietly into the night with a ruling on the papers .
He also linked a story @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should be dismissed in the name of justice .

The judge who once scolded Flynn for being a ‘traitor’ did not dismiss the case after DOJ withdrew. He did something else, instead.
He is inviting ‘amicus’ submissions on a freaking criminal trial.
The defendant has withdrawn his plea, claiming that he was pressured against his will to provide it… offering evidence of prosecutorial malfeasance that violated his rights in the process.
The DOJ has withdrawn their charges, agreeing with the Defendant that there was no lawful predicate upon which this case against General Flynn was built… and worse, that there is documentary evidence of the DOJ’s intent to entrap him.
It should be open-and-shut, right?
Nope. Not with the judge that once called the man even DOJ now calls innocent a ‘traitor’. He has taken the step of inviting amicus submissions.
D.C. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order Tuesday indicating he’ll soon accept “amicus curiae,” or “friend of the court” submissions, in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn — drawing immediate scrutiny and a planned ethics complaint against Sullivan, who had previously refused to hear amicus briefs in the case. Sullivan’s order indicated that an upcoming scheduling order would clarify the parameters of who specifically could submit the amicus briefs, which are submissions by non-parties that claim an interest in the case. Sullivan specifically said he anticipated that “individuals and organizations” will file briefs “for the benefit of the court,” as he prepares to rule on the government’s motion to dismiss the case. “Judge Sullivan, who denied leave to file amicus briefs when he knew third parties would have spoken favorably of Flynn, now solicits briefs critical of Flynn,” independent journalist Michael Cernovich wrote on Twitter Tuesday evening. “This is a violation of the judicial oath and applicable ethical rules. We will be filing a complaint against Sullivan. … [He] is acting as a politician, not a judge.” Sullivan had previously held in the Flynn case that “[o]ptions exist for a private citizen to express his views about matters of public interest, but the Court’s docket is not an available option.” Will Chamberlain, a lawyer and the editor-in-chief of Human Events, noted that case law in the circuit generally prohibits trial court judges from second-guessing the government’s decision not to prosecute a defendant. — FoxNews
Turley had some interesting observations in a tweet thread.
Interesting development just in the Flynn case. Judge Sullivan just issued an order saying “at the appropriate time, the Court will enter an Order governing the submission of any amicus curiae briefs.” That certainly does not suggest quick order granting an unopposed motion… …The Court is faced with an unopposed motion where the Justice Department no longer believes the case can be ethically prosecuted. Judge Sullivan appears incline to bring in third parties to argue against an unopposed motion where the defendant and prosecutors agree… …It is hard to imagine the court insisting on sentencing a defendant to jail when prosecutors believe he was unjustly charged. Ironically, Judge Sullivan made this motion easier due to the controversy over his prior sentencing hearing… …due to the controversy, Flynn opted not to be sentenced by Sullivan at that time. That left him unsentenced, which ironically made this motion easier. Otherwise, Flynn would have faced a more difficult post-conviction motion while on appeal. No amicus can change that record… Amicus can certainly add more heat but not light. More importantly, it is unlikely to change the outcome. I previously stated that I thought Judge Sullivan would call a hearing. This appears to confirm that he is unlikely to go quietly into the night with a ruling on the papers.
He also linked a story where he argued that the Flynn case should be dismissed in the name of justice.


clashdaily--2020-05-13--HEY CNN: Putin Wanted Hillary To Win And Your Boy Brennan Knew It… Care To Comment?

Newly declassified docs show that Brennan was lying about Russian collusion from the beginning .
That Russia narrative is getting blown to hell six ways past Sunday .
So what happens to the frauds who peddled it for the last 3 years .
In particular , what happens to the folks with access to classified docs who KNEW it was a lie from the beginning ?
CNN ’ s Russian Collusion spewing employee , John Brennan , for example ?
Do they get a pass ?
Or will they pay some sort of a meaningful price for the chaos they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ Ed Henry reported Tuesday evening that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump .
Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggested John Brennan , who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama , “ also had intel saying , actually , Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity , she had been secretary of state , and Vladimir Putin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ malleable , while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.
” Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22 : House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers , they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election .
Instead , the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House Intelligence Committee staff revealed .
They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed , substandard information in the assessment .
On Tuesday , Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report .
—Breitbart Well , so much for those ‘ seventeen agencies ’ that supposedly agreed that Russia had interfered to help Trump .
Hillary was half-right .
Putin really WAS trying to mess with the election .
Just not the way she SAID he was .
Could we please @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reaction to this news ?
That would be just precious .

Newly declassified docs show that Brennan was lying about Russian collusion from the beginning.
That Russia narrative is getting blown to hell six ways past Sunday. So what happens to the frauds who peddled it for the last 3 years.
In particular, what happens to the folks with access to classified docs who KNEW it was a lie from the beginning? CNN’s Russian Collusion spewing employee, John Brennan, for example?
Do they get a pass? Or will they pay some sort of a meaningful price for the chaos they unleashed on the nation?
Fox News’ Ed Henry reported Tuesday evening that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has declassified information calling into question the conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump. Henry told Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Tonight that the new information would suggested John Brennan, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency under President Barack Obama, “also had intel saying, actually, Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win because she was a known quantity, she had been secretary of state, and Vladimir Putin’s team thought she was more malleable, while candidate Donald Trump was unpredictable.” Former National Security Council chief of staff Fred Fleitz made a similar claim in an article on FoxNews.com April 22: House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election. Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment. On Tuesday, Henry said that he had obtained independent confirmation of the claims made by Fleitz in that report. —Breitbart
Well, so much for those ‘seventeen agencies’ that supposedly agreed that Russia had interfered to help Trump.
Hillary was half-right. Putin really WAS trying to mess with the election.
Just not the way she SAID he was.
Could we please get someone to film Hillary’s reaction to this news?
That would be just precious.


clashdaily--2020-05-13--WATCH: Rand Paul Isn’t Kissing Little Lord Fauci’s Ring At The Hearings… Asks Tough Questions

Some folks are quick to sweep Fauci ’ s botched medical predictions under the rug — but DOCTOR Rand Paul is not one of them .
If anyone is cognizant of the potential risks involved with this virus , it would be a Doctor ( missing part of his lung , mind you ) who has already survived an encounter with this much-feared illness .
So he could hardly be said to be taking the risks unseriously when he challenged the media ’ s new favorite doctor about whether public school should proceed as normal , come November .
Paul @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said that however much he might respect Dr. Fauci , he doesn ’ t think Fauci should be the end-all or the one to make this decision .
He argued for a decentralization of the decision-making to the local level , specifically because so many ‘ experts ’ have gotten it wrong .
“ The mortality between 0 and 18 in the New York data approaches zero .
It ’ s not going to be absolutely zero , but it almost approaches zero .
Between 18-45 , the mortality rate was 10 out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we do need to be thinking about that , we need to observe with an open mind what went on in Sweden where kids kept going to school .
The mortality per capita in Sweden is actually less than France , less than Italy , less than Spain , less than Belgium , less than the Netherlands , about the same as Switzerland .
But basically , I don ’ t hear anyone saying that what happened in Sweden is an unacceptable result .
I think people are intrigued by it and we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think any of us are certain when we do up these modelings .
There have been more people wrong with modellings than right .
We ’ re opening up a lot of economies around the US , and I hope that people who are predicting gloom and doom and saying ‘ we can ’ t do this , there ’ s going to be a surge ’ will admit that they were wrong if there is no surge .
Senator Paul was later asked about the exchange on Fox News .
“ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I think he wants what ’ s best for the country , but he ’ s an extremely cautious person , ” the senator added .
“ I don ’ t think any of these experts are omniscient .
I think they have a basis of knowledge but when you prognosticate about the future or advocate for things dramatic and drastic , like closing all the schools , you should look at all the information.
” …In one of the more tense moments of Tuesday ’ s hearing , Paul – the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ confirmed case of COVID-19 – said the public health response to the pandemic has been riddled with “ wrong prediction after wrong prediction ” and that Fauci should not be the one making decisions on issues outside his purview .
…Paul , who is an ophthalmologist , argued that advice from Fauci and other medical experts over when and how to reopen the country should be taken “ with a grain of salt.
” “ We have to take with a grain of salt these experts and their prognostication , ” he said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but turning down and closing the entire economy has been devastating and that is a fact.
” —FoxNews

Some folks are quick to sweep Fauci’s botched medical predictions under the rug — but DOCTOR Rand Paul is not one of them.
If anyone is cognizant of the potential risks involved with this virus, it would be a Doctor (missing part of his lung, mind you) who has already survived an encounter with this much-feared illness.
So he could hardly be said to be taking the risks unseriously when he challenged the media’s new favorite doctor about whether public school should proceed as normal, come November.
Paul came back to Fauci with facts and said that however much he might respect Dr. Fauci, he doesn’t think Fauci should be the end-all or the one to make this decision. He argued for a decentralization of the decision-making to the local level, specifically because so many ‘experts’ have gotten it wrong.
Sen. Rand Paul: "The history of this when we look back will be wrong prediction after wrong prediction after wrong prediction… As much as I respect you, Dr. Fauci, I don't think you're the end all, I don't think you're the one person that gets to make a decision." pic.twitter.com/SP9T638y2B — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) May 12, 2020
“The mortality between 0 and 18 in the New York data approaches zero. It’s not going to be absolutely zero, but it almost approaches zero. Between 18-45, the mortality rate was 10 out of 100 thousand. So really, we do need to be thinking about that, we need to observe with an open mind what went on in Sweden where kids kept going to school. The mortality per capita in Sweden is actually less than France, less than Italy, less than Spain, less than Belgium, less than the Netherlands, about the same as Switzerland. But basically, I don’t hear anyone saying that what happened in Sweden is an unacceptable result. I think people are intrigued by it and we should be. I don’t think any of us are certain when we do up these modelings. There have been more people wrong with modellings than right. We’re opening up a lot of economies around the US, and I hope that people who are predicting gloom and doom and saying ‘we can’t do this, there’s going to be a surge’ will admit that they were wrong if there is no surge.
Senator Paul was later asked about the exchange on Fox News.