clashdaily--2020-02-26--Chuck Schumer Tries To Smear Trump On ‘Virus Crisis’… But Facts Are Stubborn Things

Never let a crisis go to waste , is the Democrat wisdom .
And since nothing else has stuck , you just KNEW this tactic was coming .
They ’ re going to try ( again ) to get that ‘ Trump ’ s Katrina ’ hashtag trending… because unless they can create a scandal — ANY scandal — they are absolutely SCREWED if they have to take Trump head-on .
Here is the sort of thing Schumer is saying trying to set up a crisis in America , with the implication that if the virus does manage to hit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sFault™ .
The narrative he ’ s trying to write is that Trump isn ’ t taking this threat seriously , and he ’ s doing nothing about it .
Officials at the World Health Organization are now warning world governments to begin preparing for a pandemic , a pandemic .
But here in the United States , the Trump administration has been caught flat-footed .
The administration has no plan to deal with the Coronavirus , no plan , and seemingly no urgency to develop one .
Even now after the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with rapidly-growing economic risk , the Trump administration is scrambling to respond .
We have a crisis , and the Trump administration is trying to build an airplane while already in mid-flight .
The harsh fact of the matter is the Trump administration has shown towering and dangerous incompetence when it comes to the Coronavirus .
— HughHewittShow Hugh Hewitt had a guest on his show that was able to address the allegations ol ’ Chucky was trying to level at the president .
And Chuck was taken apart point-by-point… by Peter Navarro @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
PN : Cryin ’ Chuck .
Well , let ’ s see – no plan , no urgency .
We have a plan .
We ’ ve been moving in Trump time , which is to say as quickly as possible , since January 29 when the President courageously pulled down those flights from China .
Let me lay the plan out for you , Hugh .
And it ’ s a four-pronged strategy that we have to deal with .
The first thing is on the front lines , the personal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for our health professionals , folks in nursing facilities , things like that .
What are that ?
That ’ s the gloves , that ’ s the goggles , that ’ s Tyvek suits .
It ’ s the masks , the N95 masks .
The second thing that we need are treatment options .
The third is the vaccine development , and the fourth is the point of care diagnostics .
Hugh , we ’ ve been moving very rapidly on all four fronts .
Today , for example , on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ putting out a half a billion dollar proposal to rapidly get manufacturers of face masks in to get that done .
If you look at the treatment options , this is what ’ s interesting , Hugh .
If somebody gets Corona , and they ’ re moderately to severely infected , there ’ s , first of all , there ’ s a drug called Remdesivir .
It ’ s made by Gilead .
What we ’ ve done there are a number of things .
First of all , we ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have .
In addition , as a cost of almost $ 200 million , we ’ re moving to secure the other 90,000 doses they have in involved material .
Now the Chinese have been famously uncooperative , so what we ’ re doing with that drug is going to clinical trials in Japan as well as in Nebraska , where we have some patients .
And we ’ re hoping that within 60 days , we ’ ll have an idea whether that drug ’ s efficacious .
Secondly , on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interesting , Hugh , there ’ s a couple of thousand drugs that have been FDA-approved that we ’ re going to sequentially and rapidly screen to see if they have any efficacy .
And the good news about these , this process is they ’ re already FDA-approved .
So if we find something , we can quickly get that to the American people .
As a third treatment , there ’ s something called monoclonal antibodies .
Basically what they do when you inject them as a serum , they strengthen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and they slow down the rate of proliferation in the body of the virus .
There ’ s a company called Regeneron , and again , we ’ re working closely with them on the treatment option .
If you move to the vaccine development… HH : Can I ask you a question in between before the vaccine ?
HH : The respirators came up with Alex Azar yesterday .
PN : Yes .
This is important .
HH : In The Great Influenza by John Barry , he said that is one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ today is that we lack sufficient numbers of respirators .
Are you in charge of that supply chain as well ?
PN : Yeah , one of the things , the first thing I did , Hugh , was ask the question what do we need to treat a Corona patient .
So let me walk through that .
There ’ s 30 different elements .
If you have somebody who ’ s moderately to severely infected , you ’ re likely going to have to use a ventilator to intubate them .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ you obviously have to have these ventilators .
But you also have to have the bronchodilators .
You have to have the drugs you use for sedation and induction .
When you intubate a patient , that raises the possibility of secondary bacteria infections .
So you need a bunch of antibiotics .
And interestingly enough , you need a whole suite of them , because depending on where , what region of the country people live in , one antibiotic might be better than another .
In addition to that , when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intubate them , you can also have blood pressure issues .
So you need hypertensive impresser agents .
And finally , in some cases , a small percent , there ’ s going to be renal failure issues .
So you need that .
So what I found immediately in looking at this , Hugh , was just how dependent we are on foreign supplies for just about all of our medical supply , medical equipment , and pharmaceutical chain .
And it ’ s China a lot , but it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would note here just parenthetically that we have no friends our allies when there ’ s a crisis like this .
Back when we had the Swine flu in 2009 , our , one of our best friends , Australia , refused to send us 35 million doses of a vaccine and kept them for their own people .
And we had similar problems with the UK and Canada .
HH : Again , that was noted by John Barry .
In the middle of a health crisis , all countries hoard .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to that when it comes to a vaccine .
HH : But I ’ m talking with Peter Navarro if you ’ re just joining us , assistant to the President for trade and manufacturing .
Do you believe Team Trump is 100 % poised and ready , and in fact deployed ?
And do you believe it needs any kind of uptick in visibility ?
I wrote for the Post I would put the Vice President in charge of making statements every day .
Do you think the CDC is adequately communicating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s look at what we ’ re doing .
We have a task force that meets on a daily basis .
This is fairly unprecedented in an administration .
At the same time the task force meets at the principal level , there ’ s a deputy level task force that meets every day as well .
So if you ask if we ’ re poised to do what we need to do , the answer is yes .
Every day , we ’ re moving on these four different fronts that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know , Azar is the lead face of this .
Fauci ’ s out there talking about the health issues .
And as this develops , certainly we need to communicate more about exactly what ’ s going on .
HH : Now Larry Kudlow went on yesterday and gave a great interview on CNBC .
He noted that the human suffering is tragic , but he did not see any economic downside to this .
Do you agree with Larry Kudlow ’ s analysis ?
PN : I think that we need @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s a couple dimensions to this , Hugh .
First of all , I think if we learned anything in the trade negotiations with China , it ’ s that our economy can be very , very strong in the presence of tariffs and reduced imports from China .
So the fact that China is struggling is not likely to materially harm this economy .
The bigger issue is how that ’ s going to ripple through in the supply chains for everything else , just not pharmaceuticals .
So we ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The focus , I think , needs to be at this point is making sure we have everything we need in order to address this crisis .
And vaccine development… HH : Yeah , go back to vaccine for the last minute , yeah .
PN : Yeah .
So what we have there is a four company horse race , to mix metaphors , multiple shots on goal .
And what we ’ ve done is lay out a roadmap to get a vaccine if we are able to score on that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ’ s usually done .
And you do that through a combination of synergies in the private sector in terms of how they usually operate , and streamlining the regulations without harming safety prospects .
So… HH : So Chuck Schumer , to just wrap up , Schumer is just wrong , Peter Navarro ?
He ’ s just wrong ?
PN : He ’ s flat-out wrong .
I mean , if you sat , if you interviewed him and me , he ’ d just mouth a bunch of partisan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I just did , was tell you in granular detail everything we ’ re doing under the President ’ s leadership from day one and let your listeners decide .
HH : And so Tom Cotton said yesterday every conversation he ’ s had with the President for the last month has involved Coronavirus .
Is that the same with you , Peter Navarro , when you meet with the President ?
PN : Yes , indeed .
He ’ s , this is a hands-on president .
As I said , January @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to take those planes down from China .
He was widely criticized .
It ’ s genius in hindsight .
It ’ s exactly what we needed to do .
So… HH : Peter Navarro , assistant to the president for trade manufacturing , thanks .
Come back .
Keep us posted on Coronavirus .
And I hope the visibility of the administration effort gets higher , not lower .
— HughHewittShow

Never let a crisis go to waste, is the Democrat wisdom. And since nothing else has stuck, you just KNEW this tactic was coming.
They’re going to try (again) to get that ‘Trump’s Katrina’ hashtag trending… because unless they can create a scandal — ANY scandal — they are absolutely SCREWED if they have to take Trump head-on.
Here is the sort of thing Schumer is saying trying to set up a crisis in America, with the implication that if the virus does manage to hit America, it will be AllTrump’sFault™.
The narrative he’s trying to write is that Trump isn’t taking this threat seriously, and he’s doing nothing about it.
Here’s Chuck’s quote:
Officials at the World Health Organization are now warning world governments to begin preparing for a pandemic, a pandemic. But here in the United States, the Trump administration has been caught flat-footed. The administration has no plan to deal with the Coronavirus, no plan, and seemingly no urgency to develop one. Even now after the virus has already become a worldwide health crisis with rapidly-growing economic risk, the Trump administration is scrambling to respond. We have a crisis, and the Trump administration is trying to build an airplane while already in mid-flight. The harsh fact of the matter is the Trump administration has shown towering and dangerous incompetence when it comes to the Coronavirus. — HughHewittShow
Hugh Hewitt had a guest on his show that was able to address the allegations ol’ Chucky was trying to level at the president. And Chuck was taken apart point-by-point… by Peter Navarro. Peter is involved in Coronavirus preparation.
PN: Cryin’ Chuck. Well, let’s see – no plan, no urgency. We have a plan. We’ve been moving in Trump time, which is to say as quickly as possible, since January 29 when the President courageously pulled down those flights from China. Let me lay the plan out for you, Hugh. And it’s a four-pronged strategy that we have to deal with. The first thing is on the front lines, the personal protective equipment that we need to have for our health professionals, folks in nursing facilities, things like that. What are that? That’s the gloves, that’s the goggles, that’s Tyvek suits. It’s the masks, the N95 masks. The second thing that we need are treatment options. The third is the vaccine development, and the fourth is the point of care diagnostics. Hugh, we’ve been moving very rapidly on all four fronts. Today, for example, on the personal equipment front, HHS is putting out a half a billion dollar proposal to rapidly get manufacturers of face masks in to get that done. If you look at the treatment options, this is what’s interesting, Hugh. If somebody gets Corona, and they’re moderately to severely infected, there’s, first of all, there’s a drug called Remdesivir. It’s made by Gilead. What we’ve done there are a number of things. First of all, we’ve secured the 4,500 doses that they have. In addition, as a cost of almost $200 million, we’re moving to secure the other 90,000 doses they have in involved material. Now the Chinese have been famously uncooperative, so what we’re doing with that drug is going to clinical trials in Japan as well as in Nebraska, where we have some patients. And we’re hoping that within 60 days, we’ll have an idea whether that drug’s efficacious. Secondly, on the treatment front, and this is really interesting, Hugh, there’s a couple of thousand drugs that have been FDA-approved that we’re going to sequentially and rapidly screen to see if they have any efficacy. And the good news about these, this process is they’re already FDA-approved. So if we find something, we can quickly get that to the American people. As a third treatment, there’s something called monoclonal antibodies. Basically what they do when you inject them as a serum, they strengthen the immune system of a patient, and they slow down the rate of proliferation in the body of the virus. There’s a company called Regeneron, and again, we’re working closely with them on the treatment option. If you move to the vaccine development…
HH: Can I ask you a question in between before the vaccine?
PN: Sure. Absolutely.
HH: The respirators came up with Alex Azar yesterday.
PN: Yes. This is important.
HH: In The Great Influenza by John Barry, he said that is one of the big gaps in 1918 and today is that we lack sufficient numbers of respirators. Are you in charge of that supply chain as well?
PN: Yeah, one of the things, the first thing I did, Hugh, was ask the question what do we need to treat a Corona patient. So let me walk through that. There’s 30 different elements. If you have somebody who’s moderately to severely infected, you’re likely going to have to use a ventilator to intubate them. So in order to do that, you obviously have to have these ventilators. But you also have to have the bronchodilators. You have to have the drugs you use for sedation and induction. When you intubate a patient, that raises the possibility of secondary bacteria infections. So you need a bunch of antibiotics. And interestingly enough, you need a whole suite of them, because depending on where, what region of the country people live in, one antibiotic might be better than another. In addition to that, when you put somebody on a sedation to intubate them, you can also have blood pressure issues. So you need hypertensive impresser agents. And finally, in some cases, a small percent, there’s going to be renal failure issues. So you need that. So what I found immediately in looking at this, Hugh, was just how dependent we are on foreign supplies for just about all of our medical supply, medical equipment, and pharmaceutical chain. And it’s China a lot, but it’s also India and Europe. And I would note here just parenthetically that we have no friends our allies when there’s a crisis like this. Back when we had the Swine flu in 2009, our, one of our best friends, Australia, refused to send us 35 million doses of a vaccine and kept them for their own people. And we had similar problems with the UK and Canada.
HH: Again, that was noted by John Barry. In the middle of a health crisis, all countries hoard. And so I want to come back to that when it comes to a vaccine.
PN: Yeah.
HH: But I’m talking with Peter Navarro if you’re just joining us, assistant to the President for trade and manufacturing. Do you believe Team Trump is 100% poised and ready, and in fact deployed? And do you believe it needs any kind of uptick in visibility? I wrote for the Post I would put the Vice President in charge of making statements every day. Do you think the CDC is adequately communicating information?
PN: Well, let’s look at what we’re doing. We have a task force that meets on a daily basis. This is fairly unprecedented in an administration. At the same time the task force meets at the principal level, there’s a deputy level task force that meets every day as well. So if you ask if we’re poised to do what we need to do, the answer is yes. Every day, we’re moving on these four different fronts that I described. I think that you know, Azar is the lead face of this. Fauci’s out there talking about the health issues. And as this develops, certainly we need to communicate more about exactly what’s going on.
HH: Now Larry Kudlow went on yesterday and gave a great interview on CNBC. He noted that the human suffering is tragic, but he did not see any economic downside to this. Do you agree with Larry Kudlow’s analysis?
PN: I think that we need to see how this unfolds. There’s a couple dimensions to this, Hugh. First of all, I think if we learned anything in the trade negotiations with China, it’s that our economy can be very, very strong in the presence of tariffs and reduced imports from China. So the fact that China is struggling is not likely to materially harm this economy. The bigger issue is how that’s going to ripple through in the supply chains for everything else, just not pharmaceuticals. So we’re looking at that really carefully. The focus, I think, needs to be at this point is making sure we have everything we need in order to address this crisis. And vaccine development…
HH: Yeah, go back to vaccine for the last minute, yeah.
PN: Yeah. So what we have there is a four company horse race, to mix metaphors, multiple shots on goal. And what we’ve done is lay out a roadmap to get a vaccine if we are able to score on that in half the time, Hugh, that’s usually done. And you do that through a combination of synergies in the private sector in terms of how they usually operate, and streamlining the regulations without harming safety prospects. So…
HH: So Chuck Schumer, to just wrap up, Schumer is just wrong, Peter Navarro? He’s just wrong?
PN: He’s flat-out wrong. I mean, if you sat, if you interviewed him and me, he’d just mouth a bunch of partisan slogans. And I would do what I just did, was tell you in granular detail everything we’re doing under the President’s leadership from day one and let your listeners decide.
HH: And so Tom Cotton said yesterday every conversation he’s had with the President for the last month has involved Coronavirus. Is that the same with you, Peter Navarro, when you meet with the President?
PN: Yes, indeed. He’s, this is a hands-on president. As I said, January 29, he took a courageous decision to take those planes down from China. He was widely criticized. It’s genius in hindsight. It’s exactly what we needed to do. So…
HH: Peter Navarro, assistant to the president for trade manufacturing, thanks. Come back. Keep us posted on Coronavirus. And I hope the visibility of the administration effort gets higher, not lower. — HughHewittShow


clashdaily--2020-02-26--Is Preachy Pete Using A Practiced ‘Obama Voice’? Watch This Video And Decide…

The currency of the realm on the Left is some ephemeral thing called ‘ authenticity ’ .
So what if it turns out that Peter Pander has been a faker wearing a cynical mask all this time ?
He desperately wanted the job as President , right ?
Did he want it enough to pretend he is someone he ’ s not ?
If Obama ’ s ‘ hope and change ’ approach was enough to catapult POTUS44 into high office , all he has to do is recreate that winning formula , and he ’ s off to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a voice coach in order to LARP this campaign as PseudObama ?
One anonymous Twitter account ( that is clearly on the left ) claims that Mayor Pete ’ s new voice is very different from what it used to be .
( If your browser has trouble opening the following link , the original source can be found here . )
It ’ s being run through the memes… And that meme just happens to be backed up with evidence .
Sorry there , Peter Pander .
You can ’ t just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President hoping that duplicating his formula will make you the first openly gay one .
Nobody cares who you are PRETENDING to be… they want to know who you are .
And if you ’ re so insecure in who you are that you need to pretend to be Obama… maybe you should save everyone the trouble and just bow out now .

The currency of the realm on the Left is some ephemeral thing called ‘authenticity’. So what if it turns out that Peter Pander has been a faker wearing a cynical mask all this time?
He desperately wanted the job as President, right? Did he want it enough to pretend he is someone he’s not?
Is "Pete Obama voice" a thing? pic.twitter.com/IWU0tdg7xb — The Recount (@therecount) February 25, 2020
If Obama’s ‘hope and change’ approach was enough to catapult POTUS44 into high office, all he has to do is recreate that winning formula, and he’s off to the races… right?
Did he take on a voice coach in order to LARP this campaign as PseudObama?
One anonymous Twitter account (that is clearly on the left) claims that Mayor Pete’s new voice is very different from what it used to be. (If your browser has trouble opening the following link, the original source can be found here.)
Here’s how Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s voice sounded before his focus-grouped Obama makeover. pic.twitter.com/01KXgiwVbW — #BeTheMedia????? (@Bernie_Or_Vest) February 25, 2020
Hmmmmm, seems pretty damning, doesn’t it?
Some Twitter reaction:
OMG! Its all an act folks… hes literally acting to try to duplicate Obama for a win… There is nothing real or organic here, in fact its like a scary movie. https://t.co/f1q6JWGXye — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) February 25, 2020
It’s being run through the memes…
Mayor Pete: Hey man, can I copy your homework? Obama: Sure, just don’t make it too obvious. Mayor Pete:
pic.twitter.com/e2AaaN4GaM — Students For Trump (@TrumpStudents) February 25, 2020
And that meme just happens to be backed up with evidence.
https://publish.twitter.com/?hideConversation=on&query=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FTheRightMelissa%2Fstatus%2F1232359821745238016&widget=Tweet
Ouch.
Sorry there, Peter Pander. You can’t just ride the coattails of the First Black President hoping that duplicating his formula will make you the first openly gay one.
Nobody cares who you are PRETENDING to be… they want to know who you are. And if you’re so insecure in who you are that you need to pretend to be Obama… maybe you should save everyone the trouble and just bow out now.


clashdaily--2020-02-26--WATCH: It Didn’t Take Long For Liz Warren’s ‘Kill It’ Attack On Bloomberg To Boomerang

Of all the things she could have attacked him on … what possessed her to pick one that could come back and bite her ?
Are these people REALLY that ill-prepared ?
Or is it that nobody on their team can even see their ideological blind spots anymore .
Liz Warren wanted to keep going after Bloomberg and she picked the ‘ he treats women badly ’ angle .
Fair enough , especially with Democrats , there ’ s an appetite for than kind of an exchange .
But with all the cards she had been dealt , why did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not only defends a policy of allowing abortion until literally seconds before natural childbirth would otherwise have occurred but they oppose legislation that would compel doctors to provide-saving medical care on any infant fortunate enough to survive the attempt on its life , and manage to fill his or her tiny lungs with air .
By invoking Bloomberg ’ s alleged statement ‘ kill it ’ , she ’ s setting up Bloomberg as a heartless monster who wanted to see that unborn baby killed for , well , whatever his reasons would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unborn life with outrage that someone would dare to treat it as disposable , Warren is giving the game away , and showing her own intellectual dishonesty .
Don ’ t worry .
we ’ re getting to that , too .
And people in the Media wonder why Christians can look past Trump ’ s personal failings ?
Maybe go back and read this a couple of times until you find a clue about what might *possibly* invoke Christians to look beyond a few ‘ harsh tweets ’ and a couple of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

Of all the things she could have attacked him on … what possessed her to pick one that could come back and bite her? Are these people REALLY that ill-prepared?
Or is it that nobody on their team can even see their ideological blind spots anymore.
Liz Warren wanted to keep going after Bloomberg and she picked the ‘he treats women badly’ angle. Fair enough, especially with Democrats, there’s an appetite for than kind of an exchange.
But with all the cards she had been dealt, why did she pick THIS one?
Warren says Bloomberg told a pregnant women to "kill it". Impossible to kill a fetus. Shame on you, Senator warren. — Norm Macdonald (@normmacdonald) February 26, 2020
That’s right.
Her party not only defends a policy of allowing abortion until literally seconds before natural childbirth would otherwise have occurred but they oppose legislation that would compel doctors to provide-saving medical care on any infant fortunate enough to survive the attempt on its life, and manage to fill his or her tiny lungs with air.
By invoking Bloomberg’s alleged statement ‘kill it’, she’s setting up Bloomberg as a heartless monster who wanted to see that unborn baby killed for, well, whatever his reasons would have been.
In dignifying that little unborn life with outrage that someone would dare to treat it as disposable, Warren is giving the game away, and showing her own intellectual dishonesty.
Wow. @ewarren just criticized @MikeBloomberg for allegedly telling a pregnant female employee to “kill it.” Warren literally voted NO today on a bill to protect babies born alive after failed abortions from being killed The cognitive dissonance is astounding#DemDebate2020 pic.twitter.com/hQtZMwcqyt — Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) February 26, 2020
But… but… but… what about choice, bruh?
Don’t worry. we’re getting to that, too.
You’re missing the point, Lila. The pregnant Bloomberg employee WANTED her child, thus conferring value upon it because of choice magic. Babies that survive abortion attempts have no value. They aren’t even babies, just born fetuses. Remember, kids: Life begins at choice magic. https://t.co/DKAaRbdfg2 — Jeremy Boreing (@JeremyDBoreing) February 26, 2020
And people in the Media wonder why Christians can look past Trump’s personal failings? Maybe go back and read this a couple of times until you find a clue about what might *possibly* invoke Christians to look beyond a few ‘harsh tweets’ and a couple of divorces.
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-02-26--Marianne Williamson Was ‘Harnessing Love’ To Beat Trump — Now She’s Endorsing Bernie And ‘Really Pis

Marianne Williamson Was ‘Harnessing Love’ To Beat Trump — Now She’s Endorsing Bernie And ‘Really Pissed’

Well , who can blame her ?
I ’ d be pissed too if my party was about to select Bernie Sanders as the nominee .
After all , he ’ s a septuagenarian Socialist who can ’ t even cost out his campaign promises and had a heart attack a few months ago .
Some of his supporters are vile online trolls and his campaign leaders have been caught on video extolling the virtues of gulags , censorship , and political violence .
Somehow I don ’ t think that ’ s what she is pissed about , though @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at President Trump , the Bad Orange Man that the Democrats must defeat at any cost .
Back in June 2019 , quirky New Age-y author and self-help guru , Marianne Williamson was on stage at one of the early Democratic debates .
At the time she said , “ So , Mr. President , if you ’ re listening , I want you to hear me , please .
You have harnessed fear for political purposes and only love can cast that out .
So I sir , I have a feeling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I ’ m going to harness love for political purposes .
I will meet you on that field .
And , sir , love will win.
” Well , that ’ s down the crapper .
It seems that Williamson has tossed aside her plan to “ harness love ” for political purposes and has instead joined the angry Bernie Bros in their rage at everything and everyone .
On Sunday , Williamson joined Bernie at a rally in Austin , Texas and gave him her endorsement explaining that it was because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she alleges is taking place in America under Trump .
She said , “ I put my hand in front of my heart and I pledged allegiance to liberty and justice for all .
Turned me into a woman who gets really pissed when I see it not happening.
” “ We ’ re going to say to all those who say liberty and justice can not be done , Sure as hell can be — because we ’ re here and we ’ re with Bernie , ” she concluded .
Well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Marianne .
The concept of “ liberty and justice for all ” doesn ’ t seem to be a key component to the socialist dictatorships that Bernie has heaped effusive praise on .
He hasn ’ t met a communist dictatorship that he didn ’ t like .
He ’ s always found a way to find that “ silver lining ” that makes the authoritarian nature of the socialist regimes somehow acceptable .
Bernie has applauded the Castro communists for the literacy rate and healthcare system after the revolution in Cuba @ @ @ @ @ @ @ imprisoning of dissidents .
He was quite vocal in his condemnation of President Reagan and support for the Sandinistas in Nicaragua in the 1980s .
Bernie even met with Daniel Ortega , who had assumed power in 1979 and is the current President .
It should be noted that Ortega did spend 17 years as the opposition but has been President since 2007 .
On Sanders ’ s Senate website , an article from 2011 was posted in the “ Must Read ” section .
The piece , written by the Valley News @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dream was more easily realized in places like “ Equador , Venezuela , and Argentina ” where “ incomes are more equal today ” than in America .
More recently , he ’ s praised China for addressing extreme poverty but fails to acknowledge that the reason that people are no longer poor is because of the introduction of capitalist economic reforms .
And sure , Bernie says that he means European socialism , but even the country that he claims is a successful “ socialist ” country , Denmark , denies that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is the guy that Ms. “ Harness Love ” is throwing her support to .
That ’ s quite a great plan you ’ ve got there , Marianne !

Well, who can blame her? I’d be pissed too if my party was about to select Bernie Sanders as the nominee.
After all, he’s a septuagenarian Socialist who can’t even cost out his campaign promises and had a heart attack a few months ago. Some of his supporters are vile online trolls and his campaign leaders have been caught on video extolling the virtues of gulags, censorship, and political violence.
Somehow I don’t think that’s what she is pissed about, though. I think her rage is aimed at President Trump, the Bad Orange Man that the Democrats must defeat at any cost.
Back in June 2019, quirky New Age-y author and self-help guru, Marianne Williamson was on stage at one of the early Democratic debates. At the time she said, “So, Mr. President, if you’re listening, I want you to hear me, please. You have harnessed fear for political purposes and only love can cast that out. So I sir, I have a feeling you know what you’re doing. I’m going to harness love for political purposes. I will meet you on that field. And, sir, love will win.”
Well, that’s down the crapper.
It seems that Williamson has tossed aside her plan to “harness love” for political purposes and has instead joined the angry Bernie Bros in their rage at everything and everyone.
On Sunday, Williamson joined Bernie at a rally in Austin, Texas and gave him her endorsement explaining that it was because she was angry with the injustice that she alleges is taking place in America under Trump.
She said, “I put my hand in front of my heart and I pledged allegiance to liberty and justice for all. Turned me into a woman who gets really pissed when I see it not happening.”
“We’re going to say to all those who say liberty and justice cannot be done, Sure as hell can be — because we’re here and we’re with Bernie,” she concluded.
WATCH: Marianne Williamson went from "harnessing love" to getting "really pissed" as she endorsed Bernie Sanders. pic.twitter.com/wo0Y0CNnUm — MRCTV.org (@mrctv) February 24, 2020
Well, that’s certainly a take, Marianne.
The concept of “liberty and justice for all” doesn’t seem to be a key component to the socialist dictatorships that Bernie has heaped effusive praise on. He hasn’t met a communist dictatorship that he didn’t like. He’s always found a way to find that “silver lining” that makes the authoritarian nature of the socialist regimes somehow acceptable.
Bernie has applauded the Castro communists for the literacy rate and healthcare system after the revolution in Cuba but ignored the firing squads and the imprisoning of dissidents.
He was quite vocal in his condemnation of President Reagan and support for the Sandinistas in Nicaragua in the 1980s. Bernie even met with Daniel Ortega, who had assumed power in 1979 and is the current President. It should be noted that Ortega did spend 17 years as the opposition but has been President since 2007.
On Sanders’s Senate website, an article from 2011 was posted in the “Must Read” section. The piece, written by the Valley News Editorial Board, stated that the American Dream was more easily realized in places like “Equador, Venezuela, and Argentina” where “incomes are more equal today” than in America.
More recently, he’s praised China for addressing extreme poverty but fails to acknowledge that the reason that people are no longer poor is because of the introduction of capitalist economic reforms.
And sure, Bernie says that he means European socialism, but even the country that he claims is a successful “socialist” country, Denmark, denies that it is in fact, socialist.
This is the guy that Ms. “Harness Love” is throwing her support to.
That’s quite a great plan you’ve got there, Marianne!


clashdaily--2020-02-26--Get Woke Go Broke: How Trudeau’s PC Economy Compares To Trump’s ‘America First’

Even the Democrat-friendly media has been forced to admit that Trump ’ s economy has been doing very , very well .
That fundamental stability has ( thus far ) helped big-name investors look past current short-term disruptions to supply-lines in China and elsewhere with optimism that we will be able to bounce back once the health crisis is over and world business patterns normalize .
Canada , meanwhile , is getting its ass kicked economically .
And these differences are directly tied to the leaders of each country .
Trending : FAKE NEWS ON NOTICE : The NY Times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump Campaign Files A Libel Lawsuit While Trump went looking for ways to take the brakes off of business , turning it loose through reduced regulations and tax burden , Canada went a different direction .
They went ‘ woke ’ .
The Trudeau government buckled to protesters on multiple oil pipeline projects that would help get their major resource — oil and natural gas — to ports for export , costing thousands of Canadian jobs .
And when other companies came along with in an interest in investing in Canada ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hands while protesters illegally blocked rail lines , keeping trains from hauling products to market .
The only oil Canada CAN export goes South to the US , who have plenty already , and are only willing to buy it for well below market prices .
Supply-and-demand principles come into play .
What is the result of five years of ‘ woke ’ politics ?
According to a report by Maclean ’ s magazine , since the market peak in 2008 just before the great recession , and out of 106 world stock @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It ’ s the worst performer next to , now catch this , Venezuela .
The energy sub-index has fallen by more than a third as the TSX has gained only 14 per cent in the last 10 years , whereas the S & P 500 rose 101 per cent .
— Global News A country that has America as its primary export customer has fallen on hard times .
Obviously this isn ’ t because their American customers are suddenly struggling financially — we ’ re doing very well , thank you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the top .
There are 106 stock markets in the world , and the ONLY one of the other 105 markets they are outperforming at the moment is , yes , Venezuela .
And Democrats want us to be more like them.. ?

Even the Democrat-friendly media has been forced to admit that Trump’s economy has been doing very, very well.
That fundamental stability has (thus far) helped big-name investors look past current short-term disruptions to supply-lines in China and elsewhere with optimism that we will be able to bounce back once the health crisis is over and world business patterns normalize.
Canada, meanwhile, is getting its ass kicked economically.
And these differences are directly tied to the leaders of each country.
While Trump went looking for ways to take the brakes off of business, turning it loose through reduced regulations and tax burden, Canada went a different direction.
They went ‘woke’. The Trudeau government buckled to protesters on multiple oil pipeline projects that would help get their major resource — oil and natural gas — to ports for export, costing thousands of Canadian jobs. And when other companies came along with in an interest in investing in Canada’s largest resource, Trudeau sat on his hands while protesters illegally blocked rail lines, keeping trains from hauling products to market.
The only oil Canada CAN export goes South to the US, who have plenty already, and are only willing to buy it for well below market prices. Supply-and-demand principles come into play.
What is the result of five years of ‘woke’ politics?
According to a report by Maclean’s magazine, since the market peak in 2008 just before the great recession, and out of 106 world stock markets, Canada stands at 105th. It’s the worst performer next to, now catch this, Venezuela. The energy sub-index has fallen by more than a third as the TSX has gained only 14 per cent in the last 10 years, whereas the S&P 500 rose 101 per cent. — Global News
A country that has America as its primary export customer has fallen on hard times. Obviously this isn’t because their American customers are suddenly struggling financially — we’re doing very well, thank you very much.
The difference is leadership at the top.
There are 106 stock markets in the world, and the ONLY one of the other 105 markets they are outperforming at the moment is, yes, Venezuela.
Get Woke. Go Broke.
And Democrats want us to be more like them..?
That’s a hard pass.


clashdaily--2020-02-26--Preachy Pete At Planned Parenthood Event Says ‘We Are All Lifted Up’ By Stories Of Abortion (VIDEO)

Why should any woman care what a gay man has to say about women ’ s reproductive rights ?
Buttigieg , who is wrapping himself up in his Christianity , lauds killing babies in the womb as he tries to clinch the baby butcher vote .
What happened to “ no vagina , no opinion ” with regard to abortion ?
Personally , I think that ’ s ridiculous because we should all be concerned about how we treat the most vulnerable in society , but the standard that abortion is a “ women ’ s issue ” seems to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ left when men support abortion .
It ’ s even more egregious in Pete ’ s case — he has no chance of ever being involved in this decision .
Unless you count the incessant lecturing that it ’ s wrong to impose your view that taking the life of the unborn for convenience is morally reprehensible .
And yet , Preachy Pete wants to impose his rather extreme views on abortion on the rest of us .
But Pete is a married gay man , so he ’ s not likely going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her face this difficult decision .
This means that he literally has even less at stake than a man who created a life that a woman chooses to snuff out .
You ’ d think that the women that shriek “ my body , my choice ” while holding a sign saying “ get your rosaries off my ovaries ” would also say that a religious gay man should have zero say in abortion .
And yet… here he is applauding abortionists for their good work without anyone on the left batting an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ courageous ” woman who was grateful that she killed her child in the womb so that she could pursue her own goals by saying that “ we are all lifted up ” when we hear stories like this .
Preachy Pete then says that it ’ s important for “ a candidate like him to stand strong for women ’ s reproductive freedom.
” Notice that he couches it all in as an issue of freedom and takes a shot at Republicans for their “ narrow ” view of freedom .
Why does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to stand firm on killing babies ?
Is it because he ’ s gay or because he ’ s put the banner of “ Christian ” all over his campaign ?
Preachy Pete refuses to acknowledge that the lives of innocent children are snuffed out through abortion .
During the debate last night , Senator Elizabeth Warren accidentally said this out loud .
Many pro-lifers can clearly comprehend the argument that a woman has the right to bodily autonomy but that doesn ’ t extend to killing a life inside her , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and completely refuse to acknowledge that there is a unique life that is terminated when a woman has an abortion .
This is precisely what is wrong with the abortion debate on the left ; it completely erases one person from the debate — the child who has no voice .
It is also antithetical to the faith that Preachy Pete wears on his sleeve .
This view of people is ultimately utilitarian and not as individuals made in the image of God .
In this clip , Buttigieg is stating that it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ child and pursue an education rather than bring that child into the world .
This is a complete disregard for the unique individual in the womb .
It ’ s truly ghoulish , and it doesn ’ t sound very Christian to me .

Why should any woman care what a gay man has to say about women’s reproductive rights?
Buttigieg, who is wrapping himself up in his Christianity, lauds killing babies in the womb as he tries to clinch the baby butcher vote.
What happened to “no vagina, no opinion” with regard to abortion? Personally, I think that’s ridiculous because we should all be concerned about how we treat the most vulnerable in society, but the standard that abortion is a “women’s issue” seems to be easily discarded by those on the left when men support abortion.
It’s even more egregious in Pete’s case — he has no chance of ever being involved in this decision. Unless you count the incessant lecturing that it’s wrong to impose your view that taking the life of the unborn for convenience is morally reprehensible. And yet, Preachy Pete wants to impose his rather extreme views on abortion on the rest of us.
But Pete is a married gay man, so he’s not likely going to get some woman pregnant and have her face this difficult decision. This means that he literally has even less at stake than a man who created a life that a woman chooses to snuff out. You’d think that the women that shriek “my body, my choice” while holding a sign saying “get your rosaries off my ovaries” would also say that a religious gay man should have zero say in abortion. And yet… here he is applauding abortionists for their good work without anyone on the left batting an eye.
Buttigieg even thanked a “courageous” woman who was grateful that she killed her child in the womb so that she could pursue her own goals by saying that “we are all lifted up” when we hear stories like this.
Preachy Pete then says that it’s important for “a candidate like him to stand strong for women’s reproductive freedom.” Notice that he couches it all in as an issue of freedom and takes a shot at Republicans for their “narrow” view of freedom. Why does “a candidate like him” need to stand firm on killing babies? Is it because he’s gay or because he’s put the banner of “Christian” all over his campaign?
And now here’s Very Good Christian and Biblical Scholar Pete Buttigieg praising baby butchers and thanking them for the excellent job they do in killing human beings pic.twitter.com/ugnAtln5hA — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) February 25, 2020
Preachy Pete refuses to acknowledge that the lives of innocent children are snuffed out through abortion. During the debate last night, Senator Elizabeth Warren accidentally said this out loud.
Many pro-lifers can clearly comprehend the argument that a woman has the right to bodily autonomy but that doesn’t extend to killing a life inside her, but pro-choice advocates focus only on the woman and completely refuse to acknowledge that there is a unique life that is terminated when a woman has an abortion.
This is precisely what is wrong with the abortion debate on the left; it completely erases one person from the debate — the child who has no voice. It is also antithetical to the faith that Preachy Pete wears on his sleeve. This view of people is ultimately utilitarian and not as individuals made in the image of God.
In this clip, Buttigieg is stating that it is a better choice to abort a child and pursue an education rather than bring that child into the world. This is a complete disregard for the unique individual in the womb.
It’s truly ghoulish, and it doesn’t sound very Christian to me.


clashdaily--2020-02-26--The Early Church Was Not Socialist

The Early Church Was Not Socialist

With the rise of Sen. Bernie Sanders ( I-VT ) in the Democrat presidential primary , socialism is being discussed a lot .
Sanders is , in case you ’ ve missed it , a self-described “ Democrat-Socialist.
” Bernie ’ s view of “ socialism ” includes Universal Health Care , the Green New Deal , “ free ” public college tuition and student loan debt forgiveness , “ free ” childcare and pre-K , opposition to pro-life judges , support for Planned Parenthood , a major overhaul of the criminal justice system which lays a lot of blame @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 2nd Amendment rights , and a promotion of open borders and restricting ICE .
These policies will be vetted by the American people .
Most reading here will join me in noting the absurdity of Crazy Bernie ’ s policies .
What has bothered me lately has been the attempt by some who have tried to justify socialism by arguing the early church practiced it .
That is simply just not true .
Some have cited progressive Catholic Gregory Paul ’ s essay that asserts the early church practiced socialism .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how non-capitalistic Christianity is supposed to be we turn to the first chapter after the gospels , Acts , which describes the events of the early church .
Chapters 2 and 4 state that all ‘ the believers were together and had everything in common .
Selling their possessions and goods , they gave to anyone as he had need .
.
.
.
No one claimed that any of his possessions was his own , but they shared everything they had .
.
.
.
There were no needy persons among them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ owned lands or houses sold them , brought the money from the sales and put it at the apostles ’ feet , and it was distributed to anyone as he had need.
’ ” Gregory Paul and all who would claim the early church conducted socialism are simply wrong .
Socialism , by definition , is “ any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.
” Note that the ownership and administration of the means of production in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collective or the government .
They control production , sale , and distribution .
Socialism denies the right of private capital .
This isn ’ t how the early church functioned .
Each individual still controlled his own property and wealth .
While it is true that they sold what they had and gave to those who had need , notice that they weren ’ t compelled to do it .
Acts 4:36-37 says , “ Joseph , a Levite from Cyprus , whom the apostles called Barnabas ( which means “ son @ @ @ @ @ @ @ field he owned and brought the money and put it at the apostles ’ feet.
” Barnabas sold a field he owned .
He chose to do it .
He received the money and chose to bring it to the apostles .
He was not mandated to do it .
He wasn ’ t forced to sell and give the money .
He wanted to do it .
In Acts 5 we find the story of Ananias and Sapphira who also sold a piece of land .
It was their choice .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ money and only brought part , acting as if they ’ d brought it all .
Peter rebukes them and they pay a high price for their lie .
Notice , though , what he tells Ananias in Acts 5:4 , “ Didn ’ t it belong to you before it was sold ?
And after it was sold , wasn ’ t the money at your disposal ?
What made you think of doing such a thing ?
You have not lied just to human beings but to God.
” Notice he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disposal .
There was no requirement to give .
The early church had no connection with socialism or any kind of socialist program .
Why is this important ?
Because of Crazy Bernie , socialism is back in the news .
51 % of young people in 2018 had a positive view of socialism .
Progressive Christianity is rearing its head in the United States and trying to exert influence and promote socialist ideas .
We must stand strong .
Jesus Christ and his church have nothing in common with socialist policies or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not now .

With the rise of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) in the Democrat presidential primary, socialism is being discussed a lot. Sanders is, in case you’ve missed it, a self-described “Democrat-Socialist.” Bernie’s view of “socialism” includes Universal Health Care, the Green New Deal, “free” public college tuition and student loan debt forgiveness, “free” childcare and pre-K, opposition to pro-life judges, support for Planned Parenthood, a major overhaul of the criminal justice system which lays a lot of blame on law enforcement, elimination and limitation of 2nd Amendment rights, and a promotion of open borders and restricting ICE.
These policies will be vetted by the American people. Most reading here will join me in noting the absurdity of Crazy Bernie’s policies. What has bothered me lately has been the attempt by some who have tried to justify socialism by arguing the early church practiced it. That is simply just not true.
Some have cited progressive Catholic Gregory Paul’s essay that asserts the early church practiced socialism. He writes, “But to understand just how non-capitalistic Christianity is supposed to be we turn to the first chapter after the gospels, Acts, which describes the events of the early church. Chapters 2 and 4 state that all ‘the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need. . . . No one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they shared everything they had. . . . There were no needy persons among them. From time to time those who owned lands or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone as he had need.’”
Gregory Paul and all who would claim the early church conducted socialism are simply wrong. Socialism, by definition, is “ any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.”
Note that the ownership and administration of the means of production in a socialist system are held by a collective or the government. They control production, sale, and distribution. Socialism denies the right of private capital.
This isn’t how the early church functioned. Each individual still controlled his own property and wealth. While it is true that they sold what they had and gave to those who had need, notice that they weren’t compelled to do it. Acts 4:36-37 says, “Joseph, a Levite from Cyprus, whom the apostles called Barnabas (which means “son of encouragement”), sold a field he owned and brought the money and put it at the apostles’ feet.”
Barnabas sold a field he owned. He chose to do it. He received the money and chose to bring it to the apostles. He was not mandated to do it. He wasn’t forced to sell and give the money. He wanted to do it.
In Acts 5 we find the story of Ananias and Sapphira who also sold a piece of land. It was their choice. They, though, kept part of the money and only brought part, acting as if they’d brought it all. Peter rebukes them and they pay a high price for their lie. Notice, though, what he tells Ananias in Acts 5:4, “Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied just to human beings but to God.” Notice he told him the money was at his disposal. There was no requirement to give.
The early church had no connection with socialism or any kind of socialist program. Why is this important?
Because of Crazy Bernie, socialism is back in the news. 51% of young people in 2018 had a positive view of socialism. Progressive Christianity is rearing its head in the United States and trying to exert influence and promote socialist ideas. We must stand strong. Jesus Christ and his church have nothing in common with socialist policies or theories; not in the past and not now.


clashdaily--2020-02-26--Once Again — Maybe For The Last Time

Once Again — Maybe For The Last Time

It ’ s been a while since I did a column .
Over the years , when I was doing a radio show , along with a column , and presenting my not-so-humble opinions on Facebook , the question was always “ Is anybody paying attention ?
” Now and then a reader will write me and say nice things , on something that they saw .
To say that it gladdens my heart is somewhat of a cliché , but that ’ s the truth .
Slowly , ever so slowly , the question has changed over the years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I preaching to anyone BUT the choir ?
” To that , and regretfully , I must answer , “ No.
” .
Anyone that follows my “ stuff ” knows the things that need talking about , and that I don ’ t mince words .
There ’ s a few caveats that should be dropped in .
One , there ’ s no point in lying because in this day and age just about everything that occurs , or has occurred , can be found somewhere .
Two , to anyone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peaceful or not ( which it isn ’ t ) , look up the definition of a cult , and you ’ ll discover that it IS a cult…large , dangerous , and patient .
Three , the Second Amendment is very important because without IT , all the rest of them are “ toothless ” .
Now then , let ’ s see what ’ s going on in the world .
The headline screams Six-year-old boy BEHEADED in front of screaming mother ‘ for being wrong religion ’ …from that you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it has to do with Islam and Muslims , and of course you ’ d be correct .
Oh , the boy WAS a Muslim , of that there ’ s no doubt…just the wrong kind of Muslim .
He was a Shia , and the local bad guys were Sunnis .
Where was this , you may ask ?
It was in Saudi Arabia…yeah , that one on February 17th .
Our buddies .
That ’ s like saying because you ’ re a Christian , but you ’ re Catholic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I am going to kill you and because your parents are with you that will make it even better .
If they try to interfere we ’ ll kill them too .
Not horrified yet ?
Hold on , we ’ ve got another one for you .
This one is more common , even in America now .
Sharia in America – Iraqi refugee burnt his wife to death as an act of “ honor killing ” An Iraqi “ refugee ” burned his wife , after he strangled her to death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she did to deserve that punishment ?
Oh , yes , it was that she wanted a divorce .
Imagine that ?
If all the women in the United States that wanted a divorce were murdered , we might lose a million or so , I think .
According to Islamic tradition , the “ honor ” of the entire family is measured by women ’ s behavior .
Any action that may be perceived as harming the family ’ s honor may cost the woman her life .
In other words , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obey Islam including its strict codes of modesty but also to completely obey her husband , father , brother and even her uncle .
Do you see who has dominion over the woman ?
An Islamic woman is little more than a talking animal like a camel or a goat .
Question : Why are these barbarians in our country ?
Answer : There ’ s a two-part answer to that and it ’ s this : WAY back in the 1950 ’ s a law was passed and , while it didn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DID ban people who would be acting in opposition to our government and “ traditions ” .
Had Congress and the Supreme Court done their jobs , we wouldn ’ t have a tenth of the problems .
The second part of that answer is that Hussein made sure that the followers of his faith came to this country , in LARGE numbers .
Those two actions have allowed persons who are anti-American to permeate our various government levels .
American Academia , from kindergarten to college and beyond , has swung so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ considered as government indoctrination centers .
When subjects are taught , the content is SO far out from “ center ” one could think that they were making it up as they go along .
College , where a person once was taught to question and examine everything , has become a place where free speech means that my speech is free , and yours is too , as long as you agree with me completely .
That ’ s the First Amendment , and so long we are ( mostly ) free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from any viewpoint .
Now the Second Amendment , which is the one that we all know about…right ?
THAT one , because it denies the government from infringing on our RIGHT to keep and bear arms , is the one that makes all the others set-in-stone , so to speak .
Then there ’ s the military .
Lately , there ’ s been a lot Admirals making cotton-candy types of speeches .
Here ’ s what has been discovered lately…it appears that the Marine Corps , backed by specific types of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that centers around amphibious landings .
If you ’ re old enough , try to remember what you saw and heard of D-Day 1944 .
Back then , the Navy floated a couple of miles offshore and , with their BIG guns , pounded the enemy defenses .
Then , when they thought the time was right , the barrages stopped and the landing craft started to the shore .
Now , getting back to the present and future war…planning for an amphibious assault WITHOUT the big guns to soften the enemy is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ d call a suicide mission .

It’s been a while since I did a column. Over the years, when I was doing a radio show, along with a column, and presenting my not-so-humble opinions on Facebook, the question was always “Is anybody paying attention?” Now and then a reader will write me and say nice things, on something that they saw. To say that it gladdens my heart is somewhat of a cliché, but that’s the truth. Slowly, ever so slowly, the question has changed over the years. Now my question is…”Am I preaching to anyone BUT the choir?” To that, and regretfully, I must answer, “No.”.
Anyone that follows my “stuff” knows the things that need talking about, and that I don’t mince words. There’s a few caveats that should be dropped in. One, there’s no point in lying because in this day and age just about everything that occurs, or has occurred, can be found somewhere. Two, to anyone that considers Islam a religion, whether peaceful or not(which it isn’t), look up the definition of a cult, and you’ll discover that it IS a cult…large, dangerous, and patient. Three, the Second Amendment is very important because without IT, all the rest of them are “toothless”.
Now then, let’s see what’s going on in the world. The headline screams Six-year-old boy BEHEADED in front of screaming mother ‘for being wrong religion’…from that you’d automatically know that, somehow, it has to do with Islam and Muslims, and of course you’d be correct. Oh, the boy WAS a Muslim, of that there’s no doubt…just the wrong kind of Muslim. He was a Shia, and the local bad guys were Sunnis. Where was this, you may ask? It was in Saudi Arabia…yeah, that one on February 17th. Our buddies. That’s like saying because you’re a Christian, but you’re Catholic and I’m a Protestant, I am going to kill you and because your parents are with you that will make it even better. If they try to interfere we’ll kill them too.
Not horrified yet? Hold on, we’ve got another one for you. This one is more common, even in America now. Sharia in America – Iraqi refugee burnt his wife to death as an act of “honor killing” An Iraqi “refugee” burned his wife, after he strangled her to death. What was the awful thing that she did to deserve that punishment? Oh, yes, it was that she wanted a divorce. Imagine that? If all the women in the United States that wanted a divorce were murdered, we might lose a million or so, I think. According to Islamic tradition, the “honor” of the entire family is measured by women’s behavior. Any action that may be perceived as harming the family’s honor may cost the woman her life. In other words, a woman is required not only to obey Islam including its strict codes of modesty but also to completely obey her husband, father, brother and even her uncle. Do you see who has dominion over the woman? An Islamic woman is little more than a talking animal like a camel or a goat. Question: Why are these barbarians in our country? Answer: There’s a two-part answer to that and it’s this: WAY back in the 1950’s a law was passed and, while it didn’t specify banning Muslims, it DID ban people who would be acting in opposition to our government and “traditions”. Had Congress and the Supreme Court done their jobs, we wouldn’t have a tenth of the problems. The second part of that answer is that Hussein made sure that the followers of his faith came to this country, in LARGE numbers.
Those two actions have allowed persons who are anti-American to permeate our various government levels.
American Academia, from kindergarten to college and beyond, has swung so far to the left that schools are considered as government indoctrination centers. When subjects are taught, the content is SO far out from “center” one could think that they were making it up as they go along. College, where a person once was taught to question and examine everything, has become a place where free speech means that my speech is free, and yours is too, as long as you agree with me completely. That’s the First Amendment, and so long we are(mostly) free, we can speak on any subject from any viewpoint. Now the Second Amendment, which is the one that we all know about…right? THAT one, because it denies the government from infringing on our RIGHT to keep and bear arms, is the one that makes all the others set-in-stone, so to speak.
Then there’s the military. Lately, there’s been a lot Admirals making cotton-candy types of speeches. Here’s what has been discovered lately…it appears that the Marine Corps, backed by specific types of ships, is preparing for a war that centers around amphibious landings. If you’re old enough, try to remember what you saw and heard of D-Day 1944. Back then, the Navy floated a couple of miles offshore and, with their BIG guns, pounded the enemy defenses. Then, when they thought the time was right, the barrages stopped and the landing craft started to the shore. Now, getting back to the present and future war…planning for an amphibious assault WITHOUT the big guns to soften the enemy is going to be something that I’d call a suicide mission.


clashdaily--2020-02-25--LMAO: Trump’s Favorite Meme Maker Strikes Again… Is It His Best Yet? (Video)

The quality of these parody videos just keeps getting better .
This one looks like a movie trailer for the @ @ @ @ @ twist .
It opens like one of those action flicks where the opening credits get @ @ @ @ @ who the main characters are .
But this isn ’ t your usual rogue ’ @ @ @ @ @ anti-heroes .
These are the 2020 Democrats .
This was done up with appropriately hilarious @ @ @ @ @ s *ahem* ‘ special ’ qualities .
And because it ’ s a Carpe Donktum @ @ @ @ @ a twist at the end .
You might even call it MAGA-nificent .
And if @ @ @ @ @ , you can tell them : yes , this video has been edited .
Because @ @ @ @ @ work .
Did you love that ?
Then you ’ ll love this : “ @ @ @ @ @ by ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg , Doug Giles .

Hogg is once again proving there is a difference between having an Ivy League degree and being actually educated.


clashdaily--2020-02-25--Joe Biden Worked On Paris Climate Accord With — A VERY Dead Chinese President…?

This , Biden says , is one of the things he ’ s ‘ most proud of ’ … and just like the Nelson Mandela thing , it never actually happened .
Biden keeps bragging about how many push-ups he can do .
Somebody should let him know , it isn ’ t Joe ’ s physical health that alarms us .
Maybe he should take a little less time out for push-ups and a little more for the mental acuity exercises that are available .
Biden just made another insane boast in the most casually off-handed of ways .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Paris Climate Accord was signed in 2016 .
Joe was Veep from Jan 2009 to Jan 2017 .
Deng Xiaoping , ended his term as China ’ s head of state in 1992 .
At the age of 92 , he died in 1997 .
A bold claim like that one raises some questions .
For example , when Joe worked with Deng Xiaoping on getting the Paris Climate Accord rolling , did his methods involve an Ouija board or a seance ?
Biden Drops Nelson Mandela ’ s Name In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Out For Lying

This, Biden says, is one of the things he’s ‘most proud of’… and just like the Nelson Mandela thing, it never actually happened.
Biden keeps bragging about how many push-ups he can do.
Somebody should let him know, it isn’t Joe’s physical health that alarms us. Maybe he should take a little less time out for push-ups and a little more for the mental acuity exercises that are available.
Biden just made another insane boast in the most casually off-handed of ways.
This is, truly, becoming routine.
In his words… ‘no joke’.
The Paris Climate Accord was signed in 2016.
Joe was Veep from Jan 2009 to Jan 2017.
Deng Xiaoping, ended his term as China’s head of state in 1992. At the age of 92, he died in 1997.
A bold claim like that one raises some questions. For example, when Joe worked with Deng Xiaoping on getting the Paris Climate Accord rolling, did his methods involve an Ouija board or a seance?
Related…
Biden Drops Nelson Mandela’s Name In Crazy Story — Even NYT Calls Him Out For Lying


clashdaily--2020-02-25--Mueller Report: House Republicans To Be Making Criminal Referrals Over Prosecutorial Abuses

Nunes made this announcement during an interview with John Solomon .
Yes , we know… a criminal referral only has as much in the way of teeth as the DOJ has the willingness to prosecute it .
So our optimism is muted , to say the least .
Depending on what happens as the result of the Durham investigation , we either have a system where the inner circle can flaunt the law with impunity , or we do not .
And the Mueller Report had evidence of abuses just as egregious as the others .
For one thing , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proven to be unlawful — and the Mueller investigation would have made active use of the final one — that alone is a red flag .
Another one is that Weissman ( the guy who was present at Hillary ’ s ‘ victory party ’ and who some consider the REAL leader of the investigation ) knew the Russian Dossier was sketchy and worthless as evidence very early on .
In fact , there are solid reasons to ask why the investigation dragged on long after they would have conclusively known there were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump and Russian operatives .
It has every appearance of being an effort to weaponize the DOJ as an instrument to hamper Trump politically for as long as they possibly could .
They created a cloud of suspicion over the Presidency — most likely affecting the outcome of 2018 midterms , costing Republicans the House .
But there are now other , more concrete reasons to put forward criminal referrals… Rep. Devin Nunes , R-Calif. , the former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee , told Just the News that his team has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FBI , including witness reports known as 302s , and found glaring evidence that contradicts claims the Mueller team made to courts and Congress .
“ We ’ re now going through these 302s , and we ’ re going to be making criminal referrals on the Mueller dossier team , the people that put this Mueller report together , ” Nunes said during an interview on the John Solomon Reports podcast set to air on Tuesday .
Nunes specifically reacted to a story in Just the News disclosing that FBI interview memos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was helpful in trying to locate a witness named Joseph Mifsud but that Mueller ’ s prosecutors portrayed Papdopoulos as trying to thwart or frustrate the investigation ’ s efforts to question Mifsud .
The new FBI memos provide “ our first evidence of the Mueller team lying to the court .
It a lie .
It ’ s a total lie , ” the lawmaker said , referring to the Mueller team ’ s claim that Papadopoulos tried to hinder efforts to locate and question Mifsud .
“ I always assumed that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he ’ s kind of alluded to that , that he offered to be helpful , but we had never seen the actual 302s , ” Nunes said .
— JustTheNews The prosecutors that went so far out of their way to lock up Trump supporters for lying in the course of an investigation have been caught in one of their own .
Trump has been claiming the Russian Collusion prosecution is bogus and has using the term ‘ witch-hunt ’ from Day One .
The more we learn about prosecutorial misconduct @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the stronger his claim becomes .

Nunes made this announcement during an interview with John Solomon.
Yes, we know… a criminal referral only has as much in the way of teeth as the DOJ has the willingness to prosecute it. So our optimism is muted, to say the least.
Depending on what happens as the result of the Durham investigation, we either have a system where the inner circle can flaunt the law with impunity, or we do not. And the Mueller Report had evidence of abuses just as egregious as the others.
For one thing, since the last two FISA warrants were proven to be unlawful — and the Mueller investigation would have made active use of the final one — that alone is a red flag. Another one is that Weissman (the guy who was present at Hillary’s ‘victory party’ and who some consider the REAL leader of the investigation) knew the Russian Dossier was sketchy and worthless as evidence very early on.
In fact, there are solid reasons to ask why the investigation dragged on long after they would have conclusively known there were no connections or ‘collusion’ between Trump and Russian operatives. It has every appearance of being an effort to weaponize the DOJ as an instrument to hamper Trump politically for as long as they possibly could. They created a cloud of suspicion over the Presidency — most likely affecting the outcome of 2018 midterms, costing Republicans the House.
But there are now other, more concrete reasons to put forward criminal referrals…
Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told Just the News that his team has been scouring recent documents released by the FBI, including witness reports known as 302s, and found glaring evidence that contradicts claims the Mueller team made to courts and Congress.
“We’re now going through these 302s, and we’re going to be making criminal referrals on the Mueller dossier team, the people that put this Mueller report together,” Nunes said during an interview on the John Solomon Reports podcast set to air on Tuesday.
Nunes specifically reacted to a story in Just the News disclosing that FBI interview memos of key figure George Papadopoulos show he was helpful in trying to locate a witness named Joseph Mifsud but that Mueller’s prosecutors portrayed Papdopoulos as trying to thwart or frustrate the investigation’s efforts to question Mifsud.
The new FBI memos provide “our first evidence of the Mueller team lying to the court. It a lie. It’s a total lie,” the lawmaker said, referring to the Mueller team’s claim that Papadopoulos tried to hinder efforts to locate and question Mifsud.
“I always assumed that Papadopolis probably was helpful. I mean, he’s kind of alluded to that, that he offered to be helpful, but we had never seen the actual 302s,” Nunes said. — JustTheNews
The prosecutors that went so far out of their way to lock up Trump supporters for lying in the course of an investigation have been caught in one of their own.
Trump has been claiming the Russian Collusion prosecution is bogus and has using the term ‘witch-hunt’ from Day One.
The more we learn about prosecutorial misconduct and manipulated or even manufactured evidence, the stronger his claim becomes.


clashdaily--2020-02-25--Briefer ‘Overstated Intelligence’ About Putin’s Desire To ‘Help’ Trump

Of course , the retraction won ’ t matter .
The damage is already done .
The View was repeating the ‘ Putin ’ s Puppet ’ line , as were supposed ‘ news ’ outlets .
This is the game they play .
Yet another manufactured anti-Trump scandal just blew up in their faces .
This time it ’ s the claim that Trump is Putin ’ s preferred candidate and will be doing what he can to help Trump win in 2020 .
Truth doesn ’ t matter .
Political gain , helping your team and hurting theirs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been playing this game for years .
Trending : FAKE NEWS ON NOTICE : The NY Times Just Got Some BAD News — The Trump Campaign Files A Libel Lawsuit The only part they can ’ t understand is why it isn ’ t working as well as it used to .
Normally , a super-heated report like this one… … would be enough to make a Republican cry ‘ uncle ’ and desperately swerve to the Left to ‘ prove ’ how he isn ’ t ‘ that ’ kind of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their little game , and his supporters no longer buy the lie .
The fake news media types have been exposed as the duplicitous hacks that we have long suspected they were .
And now they ’ ve been caught red-handed — again and again and again .
They run with unvetted anti-Trump reports , eat up Schiff ’ s outrageously dishonest leaks , but call people like Nunes ‘ conspiracy theorists ’ .
And time after time after time , the media are shown to have been on the wrong side of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Like it says on Mulder ’ s poster… they WANT to believe .
Contrary to numerous recent media reports , there is no evidence to suggest that Russia is making a specific “ play ” to boost President Trump ’ s reelection bid , a U.S. intelligence official told Fox News on Sunday .
In addition , top U.S. election official Shelby Pierson , who briefed Congress on Russian election interference efforts , may have overstated intelligence regarding the issue when speaking to the House Intelligence Committee earlier this month , the source @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last week , citing people familiar with her work , that Pierson “ has a reputation for being injudicious with her words and not appreciating the delicate work of corralling federal agencies , technology firms and state election officials to collaborate on election security.
” U.S. intelligence officials have publicly testified only that the Russians have been using “ information warfare ” ahead of the election .
Fox News is told Democrats pressed Pierson on whether Russia was trying to help Trump , and accurate context or perspective to her responses failed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strides in preventing Russian interference this year , Fox News also was told .
—FoxNews What story did the media want us to believe ?
Following Sanders ’ big win in the Nevada caucuses on Sunday , pundit James Carville declared on MSNBC that Russian President Vladimir Putin was the real winner in the race — a claim that drew mockery online , even as it remained a dominant theme among establishment pundits .
For example , Dan Pfeiffer , a onetime adviser to former President Obama , went so far as to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ win in order to “ give Trump the opponent that Trump wants ” in November .
And , CNN national security analyst Asha Rangappa , who briefly served in the FBI before becoming a university admissions officer , asserted that “ Russia loves Bernie ” because “ He , like Trump , plays the ‘ us vs. them ’ game , and the ‘ them ’ is anyone who doesn ’ t support him , personally .
It ’ s destructive , divisive , and encourages disillusionment in our institutions .
Sound familiar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reality , there are a lot more forces out there besides Russia that would love to mess with our elections .
Rival nation-states , non-state actors , hacktivists and even some domestic players each have their own reasons for wanting to tilt the outcome , or even just throw the whole thing into confusion .

Of course, the retraction won’t matter. The damage is already done. The View was repeating the ‘Putin’s Puppet’ line, as were supposed ‘news’ outlets.
This is the game they play. Yet another manufactured anti-Trump scandal just blew up in their faces.
This time it’s the claim that Trump is Putin’s preferred candidate and will be doing what he can to help Trump win in 2020.
Truth doesn’t matter. Political gain, helping your team and hurting theirs is what matters. They’ve been playing this game for years.
The only part they can’t understand is why it isn’t working as well as it used to. Normally, a super-heated report like this one…
Gonna be a tough 4 years for unhinged lunatics like this MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell: ‘Donald Trump Is a Russian Operative’ :: Grabien News https://t.co/JlsD4aZt0L — John Steigerwald (@Steigerworld) February 22, 2020
… would be enough to make a Republican cry ‘uncle’ and desperately swerve to the Left to ‘prove’ how he isn’t ‘that’ kind of a Republican.
Trump isn’t playing their little game, and his supporters no longer buy the lie.
The fake news media types have been exposed as the duplicitous hacks that we have long suspected they were. And now they’ve been caught red-handed — again and again and again.
They run with unvetted anti-Trump reports, eat up Schiff’s outrageously dishonest leaks, but call people like Nunes ‘conspiracy theorists’. And time after time after time, the media are shown to have been on the wrong side of the story… for exactly one reason:
Like it says on Mulder’s poster… they WANT to believe.
Contrary to numerous recent media reports, there is no evidence to suggest that Russia is making a specific “play” to boost President Trump’s reelection bid, a U.S. intelligence official told Fox News on Sunday.
In addition, top U.S. election official Shelby Pierson, who briefed Congress on Russian election interference efforts, may have overstated intelligence regarding the issue when speaking to the House Intelligence Committee earlier this month, the source added.
The Wall Street Journal reported last week, citing people familiar with her work, that Pierson “has a reputation for being injudicious with her words and not appreciating the delicate work of corralling federal agencies, technology firms and state election officials to collaborate on election security.”
U.S. intelligence officials have publicly testified only that the Russians have been using “information warfare” ahead of the election. Fox News is told Democrats pressed Pierson on whether Russia was trying to help Trump, and accurate context or perspective to her responses failed to emerge.
Intelligence agencies have made great strides in preventing Russian interference this year, Fox News also was told. —FoxNews
What story did the media want us to believe?
Following Sanders’ big win in the Nevada caucuses on Sunday, pundit James Carville declared on MSNBC that Russian President Vladimir Putin was the real winner in the race — a claim that drew mockery online, even as it remained a dominant theme among establishment pundits.
For example, Dan Pfeiffer, a onetime adviser to former President Obama, went so far as to say Sunday that Russians wanted Sanders to win in order to “give Trump the opponent that Trump wants” in November.
And, CNN national security analyst Asha Rangappa, who briefly served in the FBI before becoming a university admissions officer, asserted that “Russia loves Bernie” because “He, like Trump, plays the ‘us vs. them’ game, and the ‘them’ is anyone who doesn’t support him, personally. It’s destructive, divisive, and encourages disillusionment in our institutions. Sound familiar?” —FoxNews
Of course, in reality, there are a lot more forces out there besides Russia that would love to mess with our elections. Rival nation-states, non-state actors, hacktivists and even some domestic players each have their own reasons for wanting to tilt the outcome, or even just throw the whole thing into confusion.


clashdaily--2020-02-25--WINNING: ‘Trump Has Effectively Flipped 9th Circuit’, Left Is Getting Frustrated

This certainly gives context to the bleating we ’ re hearing from a certain ‘ wise Latina ’ about the politicization of the judiciary , doesn ’ t it ?
She blasted her peers for carrying Trump ’ s water but somehow had nothing to say about the Chief Justice jumping through hoops to make ObamaCare ‘ comply ’ with the law , in direct contradiction of specific descriptions about the policy made by the government itself .
But now that the pendulum has started shifting AWAY from the Progressive wing of the courts , NOW , Sotomayor ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is she suddenly speaking out ?
Probably because she sees the Left losing a valuable tool in their power base .
Even as they have been making cultural inroads , they have been losing their LEGAL enforcement tools… including politically friendly courts .
In few places has the effect been felt more powerfully than in the sprawling 9th Circuit , which covers California and eight other states .
Because of Trump ’ s success in filling vacancies , the San Francisco-based circuit , long dominated by Democratic appointees , has suddenly shifted to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pronounced tilt expected in the years ahead .
Trump has now named 10 judges to the 9th Circuit — more than one-third of its active judges — compared with seven appointed by President Obama over eight years .
“ Trump has effectively flipped the circuit , ” said 9th Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith Jr. , an appointee of President George W. Bush .
…To be sure , some of the new appointees to the 9th Circuit have quickly won the respect of their colleagues .
But the rapid influx of so many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has put strains upon the court and stirred criticism among judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents .
“ Ten new people at once sends a shock wave through the system , ” a 9th Circuit judge said .
— LA Times Many of the Trump appointees ( not surprisingly ) are not the kind who will step-and-fetch to the political party line .
They know their own mind , and are not afraid to dissent from the prevailing opinion if they believe they are in the right .
We are seeing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the overall court system , having previously had a reputation for being frequently overturned on appeal .
The 9th Circuit court has been dominated by Democratic appointees for decades .
In 1978 , a federal law created 10 new judgeships on the court , allowing President Carter to fill them all .
The liberal Carter appointees were followed by judges named by three Republican presidents and two Democrats .
Clinton ’ s and Obama ’ s appointees were not uniformly liberal , however , and the 9th Circuit has been growing more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years 2010 to 2015 , found that the 9th Circuit was the third most reversed by the Supreme Court , following the Ohio-based 6th and Georgia-based 11th circuits .
Still , with Democratic nominees heavily outnumbering Republicans , there were usually enough votes to overturn conservative decisions by three-judge panels .
— LA Times Trump was elected , in part , to reign in the runaway activism we ’ ve seen in the courts .
If even the ‘ 9th Circus ’ is feeling ‘ a shock wave through the system ’ , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of ‘ promises made , promises kept ’ .

This certainly gives context to the bleating we’re hearing from a certain ‘wise Latina’ about the politicization of the judiciary, doesn’t it?
She blasted her peers for carrying Trump’s water but somehow had nothing to say about the Chief Justice jumping through hoops to make ObamaCare ‘comply’ with the law, in direct contradiction of specific descriptions about the policy made by the government itself.
But now that the pendulum has started shifting AWAY from the Progressive wing of the courts, NOW, Sotomayor’s political scruples are suddenly offended.
Why is she suddenly speaking out? Probably because she sees the Left losing a valuable tool in their power base. Even as they have been making cultural inroads, they have been losing their LEGAL enforcement tools… including politically friendly courts.
In few places has the effect been felt more powerfully than in the sprawling 9th Circuit, which covers California and eight other states. Because of Trump’s success in filling vacancies, the San Francisco-based circuit, long dominated by Democratic appointees, has suddenly shifted to the right, with an even more pronounced tilt expected in the years ahead.
Trump has now named 10 judges to the 9th Circuit — more than one-third of its active judges — compared with seven appointed by President Obama over eight years.
“Trump has effectively flipped the circuit,” said 9th Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith Jr., an appointee of President George W. Bush.
…To be sure, some of the new appointees to the 9th Circuit have quickly won the respect of their colleagues. But the rapid influx of so many judges — most without judicial experience — has put strains upon the court and stirred criticism among judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents.
“Ten new people at once sends a shock wave through the system,” a 9th Circuit judge said. — LA Times
Many of the Trump appointees (not surprisingly) are not the kind who will step-and-fetch to the political party line. They know their own mind, and are not afraid to dissent from the prevailing opinion if they believe they are in the right.
We are seeing a shift toward moderation in the make-up of the overall court system, having previously had a reputation for being frequently overturned on appeal.
The 9th Circuit court has been dominated by Democratic appointees for decades. In 1978, a federal law created 10 new judgeships on the court, allowing President Carter to fill them all. The liberal Carter appointees were followed by judges named by three Republican presidents and two Democrats.
Clinton’s and Obama’s appointees were not uniformly liberal, however, and the 9th Circuit has been growing more moderate. One study, examining the years 2010 to 2015, found that the 9th Circuit was the third most reversed by the Supreme Court, following the Ohio-based 6th and Georgia-based 11th circuits.
Still, with Democratic nominees heavily outnumbering Republicans, there were usually enough votes to overturn conservative decisions by three-judge panels. — LA Times
Trump was elected, in part, to reign in the runaway activism we’ve seen in the courts.
If even the ‘9th Circus’ is feeling ‘a shock wave through the system’, you could say this is another example of ‘promises made, promises kept’.


clashdaily--2020-02-25--Chris Matthews Gives Grovelling Apology To Bernie… But Trump, Not So Much

Chris Matthews committed the Cardinal Sin of mainstream journalism — he described a Leftist he didn ’ t like the same way they do a Republican .
And now he ’ s doing a mea culpa .
Chris ‘ Tingle down my leg ’ Matthews just ran into the Bernie Buzzsaw .
He is convinced that a Bernie win will lead to a second Trump term… a fate worse than death .
And blinded by his Trump Derangement Syndrome , Chris expanded his ‘ literally Hitler ’ anti-Trump metaphor to include Bernie winning the delegate count in Nevada .
Trending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NY Times Just Got Some BAD News — The Trump Campaign Files A Libel Lawsuit Bernie winning was seen as comparable to the Maginot Line falling .
We covered that story here — Chris Matthews Freaks Out Over Bernie ’ s Nevada Win… Invokes Hitler Whatever the reason , an apology was wrung out of him only days later .
One in which he pledged to do a ‘ better job ’ of ‘ elevating the discourse ’ .
Sure you will , Chris .
Has he ever once owned up to anything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Meh , probably not .
But nobody on the right watches MSNBC anyway , so what does he care ?
How did Chris make this kind of a faux pas in the first place ?
Maybe he forgot that Sanders is on the Left should be treated as an ally on his network ?
Maybe he forgot that there is a reason that you don ’ t make Hitler comparisons to a guy of Jewish ancestry ?
Whatever the reason , there were calls for Matthew ’ s head on a plate .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ reaction he ’ s getting from the Left .
We notice Rosie O ’ Donnel never got to ‘ apologize ’ her way out of the maw of Cancel Culture .
Then again , Chris didn ’ t have a hit show that made Trump supporters look relatable , either .
But one Jewish voice is throwing a wrench in the poor-me-victim-of-antisemitism narrative… Ben Shapiro .
One key difference between Ben and Bernie is that Ben actually LIVES as a Jew in terms of culture , tradition and ( especially ) religion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the mainstream media dare not touch :

Chris Matthews committed the Cardinal Sin of mainstream journalism — he described a Leftist he didn’t like the same way they do a Republican. And now he’s doing a mea culpa.
Mea Culpa. Mea Maxima culpa.
Chris ‘Tingle down my leg’ Matthews just ran into the Bernie Buzzsaw.
He is convinced that a Bernie win will lead to a second Trump term… a fate worse than death. And blinded by his Trump Derangement Syndrome, Chris expanded his ‘literally Hitler’ anti-Trump metaphor to include Bernie winning the delegate count in Nevada.
Bernie winning was seen as comparable to the Maginot Line falling.
We covered that story here — Chris Matthews Freaks Out Over Bernie’s Nevada Win… Invokes Hitler
Whatever the reason, an apology was wrung out of him only days later. One in which he pledged to do a ‘better job’ of ‘elevating the discourse’. Sure you will, Chris.
Has he ever once owned up to anything he was wrong about with Trump? Meh, probably not. But nobody on the right watches MSNBC anyway, so what does he care?
MSNBC’s Chris Matthews apologizes to Bernie Sanders for comparing his Frontrunner status after winning Nevada to when the Nazis took France. pic.twitter.com/pRBJppkzvy — ALX ?? (@alx) February 25, 2020
How did Chris make this kind of a faux pas in the first place? Maybe he forgot that Sanders is on the Left should be treated as an ally on his network? Maybe he forgot that there is a reason that you don’t make Hitler comparisons to a guy of Jewish ancestry?
Whatever the reason, there were calls for Matthew’s head on a plate.
How bad has it gotten? Democrats are actually calling for Chris Matthews' resignation for being TOO FAR RIGHT. Just wow. P.S. This is hilarious. — Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) February 24, 2020
Here is the ‘all is forgiven’ reaction he’s getting from the Left.
Watershed moment?: Chris Matthews apologizes to Bernie Sanders for comparing his NV win to Nazi invasion. “I’m sorry for comparing anything from that tragic era in which so many suffered, esp the Jewish people, to an electoral result in which you were the well-deserved winner.” — Holly Otterbein (@hollyotterbein) February 25, 2020
We notice Rosie O’Donnel never got to ‘apologize’ her way out of the maw of Cancel Culture. Then again, Chris didn’t have a hit show that made Trump supporters look relatable, either.
But one Jewish voice is throwing a wrench in the poor-me-victim-of-antisemitism narrative… Ben Shapiro.
One key difference between Ben and Bernie is that Ben actually LIVES as a Jew in terms of culture, tradition and (especially) religion.
Ben brings up an awkward point that the mainstream media dare not touch:
So here's the deal: spare me the crocodile tears about anti-Semitism, you ridiculous cretins. Matthews was clearly not being anti-Semitic, and you guys care as much about anti-Semitism as you do about the plight of Cuban dissenters under Castro. — Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) February 24, 2020
Castro, eh?
Yep. Ben went there.