clashdaily--2020-05-13--WATCH: Cop Speaks Out Against Unconstitutional Covid-Related Police Action… Pays A Price

Greg Anderson , a cop and former soldier , posted a video explaining his support for upholding his oath .
He explained the importance of having the Constitution be the North Star that guides which directives a police officer will enforce , and why the excuse of ‘ only followed orders ’ is no excuse at all .
This video first caught fire on May 5th .
He cited some examples of police action against civilians across the country in this Covid lockdown that have no apparent basis in law , and he called on his fellow Law Enforcement Officers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He appealed to the Constitution , and he appealed to the need for healthy levels of trust and respect between the public and the police .
It was a message his superior officer supported and praised when there were a few thousand views at five am .
Here is the original video .
He raised concerns that such an erosion of that trust could create unnecessary conflict and raise the risk of physical danger in future interactions between police and the public they are sworn to protect .
That message his officer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a short three hours later .
Suddenly , they were insisting he take the video down .
What changed ?
It went nuclear on social media .
Now brass was breathing down his neck .
Officer Anderson — who , in this very video , called on his fellow officers to do the right thing , even if your integrity causes you to pay a personal price , was told to take down the video .
If he did so , they would let him get off with a letter of reprimand .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ on administrative leave and facing termination .
Here ’ s his explanation for ‘ why ’ .
His Chief told him ‘ if you openly defy your Governor , you can ’ t be a police officer in the state of Washington.
’ Anderson reminds us that case law like Marberry vs. Madison ( 1803 ) expressly states that any law in conflict with the Constitution is Null And Void .
Ultimately , that would make such laws unenforceable by police , regardless of who it is making orders to the contrary .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ refusing a direct order ’ and ‘ insubordination ’ because he was told to take down this video and he did not .
In a world full of chumps , this guy ’ s a champ .
You know what to do Clash Nation… let ’ s make him famous , and shine a light on the political hacks who think Obedience to Petty Potentates is more important in America than the Constitution that safeguards our rights .

Greg Anderson, a cop and former soldier, posted a video explaining his support for upholding his oath. He explained the importance of having the Constitution be the North Star that guides which directives a police officer will enforce, and why the excuse of ‘only followed orders’ is no excuse at all.
This video first caught fire on May 5th.
He cited some examples of police action against civilians across the country in this Covid lockdown that have no apparent basis in law, and he called on his fellow Law Enforcement Officers NOT to take any such illegitimate actions. He appealed to the Constitution, and he appealed to the need for healthy levels of trust and respect between the public and the police.
It was a message his superior officer supported and praised when there were a few thousand views at five am.
Here is the original video.
View this post on Instagram A post shared by Greg Anderson (@granderson33) on May 5, 2020 at 4:52pm PDT
He raised concerns that such an erosion of that trust could create unnecessary conflict and raise the risk of physical danger in future interactions between police and the public they are sworn to protect.
That message his officer had praised was suddenly ‘problematic’ a short three hours later. Suddenly, they were insisting he take the video down.
What changed? It went nuclear on social media. Now brass was breathing down his neck.
Officer Anderson — who, in this very video, called on his fellow officers to do the right thing, even if your integrity causes you to pay a personal price, was told to take down the video. If he did so, they would let him get off with a letter of reprimand.
He refused. Now he’s on administrative leave and facing termination.
Here’s his explanation for ‘why’. His Chief told him ‘if you openly defy your Governor, you can’t be a police officer in the state of Washington.’
Anderson reminds us that case law like Marberry vs. Madison (1803) expressly states that any law in conflict with the Constitution is Null And Void.
Ultimately, that would make such laws unenforceable by police, regardless of who it is making orders to the contrary.
Now he’s facing termination for ‘refusing a direct order’ and ‘insubordination’ because he was told to take down this video and he did not.
In a world full of chumps, this guy’s a champ.
You know what to do Clash Nation… let’s make him famous, and shine a light on the political hacks who think Obedience to Petty Potentates is more important in America than the Constitution that safeguards our rights.
As always — stay rowdy!
Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to paint Jesus as a non-offensive bearded woman who endorses their agenda. This book blows that nonsense all to hell. From the stonking laptop of bestselling author, Doug Giles, comes a new book that focuses on Jesus’ overt masculine traits like no other books have heretofore. It’s informative, bold, hilarious, and scary. Giles has concluded, after many years of scouring the scripture that, If Masculinity Is ‘Toxic’, Call Jesus Radioactive.


clashdaily--2020-05-13--Cancel Culture Comes For Leftist Rocker, Bryan Adams, Over ‘Racist’ Covid Tweet

It doesn ’ t matter how ‘ woke ’ you are , it only takes one wrong step before your supposed ‘ friends ’ and ‘ allies ’ throw you to the wolves .
Just ask woke 80s rocker Bryan Adams .
He ’ s feeling the blunt end of life ’ s pool cue at the moment , and no amount of his Progressive Pedigree is going to save him .
Adams transgressed a line that ( at the moment ) is part of a narrative .
And transgressing the narrative is an Unforgiveable Sin .
Even his animal-rights @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He has come face-to-face with the same issue so many of the rest of us in the whole CCP Wuhan Coronavirus crisis .
He just wants to get on with living his life and earning a living .
Naturally , ‘ earning a living ’ by filling stadiums looks a little different than it does for someone driving a truck or waiting tables , but the principle is the same .
This whole WuFlu issue threw a wrench into EVERYONE ’ s plans .
The folks ( like many government employees or desk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comparatively unaffected are mostly interested in the sickness side of this ledger .
Those who are getting hit in their pocketbook , or putting significant plans on hold , are seeing it through a very different lens .
And the anger is starting to bubble up .
Including Adams .
His tweet has , of course , been taken down now .
Here ’ s a taste of how the world reacted to it .
Most of the Left curb-stomped him over it .
Others found his criticism of China ’ s role @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his obligatory apology .
Apologies to any and all that took offence to my posting yesterday , ” Adams wrote .
“ No excuse , I just wanted to have a rant about the horrible animal cruelty in these wet-markets being the possible source of the virus , and promote veganism .
I have love for all people and my thoughts are with everyone dealing with this pandemic around the world.
” — IBTimes What did he say that was so terrible ?
Should he have apologized ?
Some say ‘ no ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to controversy , had a little friendly advice to Adams .
Bryan Adams is probably best remembered for some of his hits from the 80s : songs like ‘ Cuts Like A Knife ’ ( which he referenced in his tweet ) , ‘ Summer of ’ 69 ’ , ‘ Everything I Do , I Do It For You ’ , and ‘ Have You Ever Really Loved A Woman ’ .
To be honest , it is a little satisfying to see the perpetually-offended leftist Cancel Culture turn on their own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to bring that totalitarian cancel culture impulse to its knees is by unmasking its true diabolical nature .
That would require the Left seeing friendly fire destroy some people they really like , showing them how destructive it really is for a supposedly civil society .

It doesn’t matter how ‘woke’ you are, it only takes one wrong step before your supposed ‘friends’ and ‘allies’ throw you to the wolves. Just ask woke 80s rocker Bryan Adams.
He’s feeling the blunt end of life’s pool cue at the moment, and no amount of his Progressive Pedigree is going to save him.
Adams transgressed a line that (at the moment) is part of a narrative. And transgressing the narrative is an Unforgiveable Sin.
Even his animal-rights and vegan cred are no defense.
He has come face-to-face with the same issue so many of the rest of us in the whole CCP Wuhan Coronavirus crisis. He just wants to get on with living his life and earning a living.
Naturally, ‘earning a living’ by filling stadiums looks a little different than it does for someone driving a truck or waiting tables, but the principle is the same.
This whole WuFlu issue threw a wrench into EVERYONE’s plans. The folks (like many government employees or desk jockeys) who can ride this out comparatively unaffected are mostly interested in the sickness side of this ledger.
Those who are getting hit in their pocketbook, or putting significant plans on hold, are seeing it through a very different lens. And the anger is starting to bubble up. Including Adams.
His tweet has, of course, been taken down now. Here’s a taste of how the world reacted to it.
I didn’t have Bryan Adams going on an unnecessary xenophobic rant during a global pandemic on my COVID-19 bingo card. Did you? https://t.co/luknEQ1Qou — Katy Ingraham (@KatyIngraham) May 11, 2020
Most of the Left curb-stomped him over it. Others found his criticism of China’s role in this pandemic refreshing.
Naturally, that criticism didn’t last long.
Here is his obligatory apology.
Apologies to any and all that took offence to my posting yesterday,” Adams wrote. “No excuse, I just wanted to have a rant about the horrible animal cruelty in these wet-markets being the possible source of the virus, and promote veganism. I have love for all people and my thoughts are with everyone dealing with this pandemic around the world.” — IBTimes
What did he say that was so terrible?
Should he have apologized? Some say ‘no’.
The only thing Bryan Adams did this week to disappoint me was apologizing. — Cory Morgan (@CoryBMorgan) May 12, 2020
Katie Hopkins, herself no stranger to controversy, had a little friendly advice to Adams.
Bryan Adams is probably best remembered for some of his hits from the 80s: songs like ‘Cuts Like A Knife’ (which he referenced in his tweet), ‘Summer of ’69’, ‘Everything I Do, I Do It For You’, and ‘Have You Ever Really Loved A Woman’.
To be honest, it is a little satisfying to see the perpetually-offended leftist Cancel Culture turn on their own.
Realistically, the most likely way to bring that totalitarian cancel culture impulse to its knees is by unmasking its true diabolical nature. That would require the Left seeing friendly fire destroy some people they really like, showing them how destructive it really is for a supposedly civil society.


clashdaily--2020-05-13--BREAKING: Obama Officials Involved In Flynn ‘Unmasking’ Have Been Named–Here’s The 411

Things aren ’ t looking good for the presumptive Democratic nominee for President because he ’ s on The List .
The names of over three-dozen high-ranking Obama administration officials have been named as individuals who may have received General Michael Flynn ’ s “ unmasked ” identity in response to a request that was made between the day of the 2016 election and January 31 , 2017 .
The List includes President Obama ’ s Chief of Staff , Denis McDonough , former FBI Director James Comey , former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper , former CIA Director @ @ @ @ @ @ @ United Nations , Samantha Power , and the last person named is former Vice President Joe Biden , the presumptive Democratic nominee .
The list includes 37 individuals , but it ’ s clear that Obama knew even though he was not directly named .
Here ’ s the complete list in the order listed : • U.S .
Ambassador to the United Nations–Samatha Power • U.S .
Ambassador to Italy and the Republic of San Marco–John R. Phillips • U.S. Representative to the NATO Military Committee–VADM Christenson • Director of the Federal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Defense Advisor ( ODA ) Policy Advisor for Russia–Lt .
Col. Paul Greenhreng • U.S. Deputy Chief of U.S. Mission to NATO ( USNATO ) –Mr .
Litzenberger • Chief of Staff to the President of the United States–Denis McDonough Trending : HEY CNN : Putin Wanted Hillary To Win And Your Boy Brennan Knew It… Care To Comment ?
Last week , Acting DNI Rick Grenell declassified the list of individuals and delivered it to the DOJ .
It was then unclear if the list would be made public .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ intention of releasing the names .
DNI Grenell then sent The List to Senator Grassley ( R-IA ) and Senator Ron Johnson ( R-WI ) , who then released it to the public .
Grenell appeared to have delivered those files to the DOJ last week .
The declassified list showed recipients who “ may have received Lt. Gen Flynn ’ s identity in response to a request processed between 8 November 2016 and 31 January 2017 to unmask an identity that had been generically referred to in an NSA foreign intelligence report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fox News , read .
“ Each individual was an authorized recipient of the original report and the unmasking was approved through NSA ’ s standard process , which includes a review of the justification for the request , ” the document said .
“ Only certain personnel are authorized to submit unmasking requests into the NSA system .
In this case , 16 authorized individuals requested unmasking for [ REDACTED ] different NSA intelligence reports for select identified principals.
” The document added : “ While the principals are identified below , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unmasked information .
This response does not include any requests outside of the specified time-frame.
” The list revealed that then-U.S .
Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power made unmasking requests seven times between Nov. 30 , 2016 and Jan. 11 , 2017 .
The list revealed that Clapper made three requests from Dec. 2 , 2016 through Jan. 7 , 2017 ; that Brennan made two requests , one on Dec. 14 and one on Dec. 15 , 2016 .
Comey also made a request on Dec. 15 , 2016 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ made one request , and on Jan. 12 , 2017 , then-Vice President Biden made one request .
This comes at a really , really bad time as it was just yesterday morning that Democrat Hack Turned Serious Journalist™ George Stephanopoulos asked Sleepy Joe about this very thing and he flip-flopped on his response on live television .
Senator Rand Paul ( R-KY ) is on an absolute tear after the list was released : Get ready , folks !
Durham is still conducting his investigation , and this thing ain ’ t @ @ @

Things aren’t looking good for the presumptive Democratic nominee for President because he’s on The List.
The names of over three-dozen high-ranking Obama administration officials have been named as individuals who may have received General Michael Flynn’s “unmasked” identity in response to a request that was made between the day of the 2016 election and January 31, 2017.
The List includes President Obama’s Chief of Staff, Denis McDonough, former FBI Director James Comey, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former Ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, and the last person named is former Vice President Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee. The list includes 37 individuals, but it’s clear that Obama knew even though he was not directly named.
Here’s the complete list in the order listed:
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations–Samatha Power Director for National Intelligence–James R. Clapper Deputy Chief of Mission–Kelly Degnan U.S. Ambassador to Italy and the Republic of San Marco–John R. Phillips Director of the CIA–John O. Brennan OIA Director–Patrick Conlon Secretary of the Treasury–Jacob Lew Acting Assistant Secretary Treasury–Arthur “Danny” McGlynn Deputy Secretary of the Treasury–Sarah Raskin Under Secretary Treasury–Nathan Sheets Acting Under Secretary Treasury–Adam Szubin U.S.NATO Defense Advisor (DEFAD)–Mr. Robert Bell U.S. Representative to the NATO Military Committee–VADM Christenson Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation–James Comey Chief Syria Group–[REDACTED] Deputy Assistant Director of NEMC [REDACTED] U.S.NATO Office of the Defense Advisor (ODA) Policy Advisor for Russia–Lt. Col. Paul Greenhreng U.S.NATO [REDACTED] Advisor to Ambassador Douglas Lute–[REDACTED] U.S.NATO Deputy DEFAD–Mr. James Hursh Chief Syria Group–[REDACTED] U.S. Deputy Chief of U.S. Mission to NATO (USNATO)–Mr. Litzenberger U.S. Permanent Representative (PermRep) to NATO–Ambassador Douglas Lute U.S.A.-DOE-IN-Executive Briefer U.S.NATO Political Officer[REDACTED]–Mr. Scott Parrish U.S.A. – DOE – Deputy Secretary of Energy–Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall U.S.A.- DOE-IN – Executive Briefer–[REDACTED] U.S.NATO Political Advisor (POLAD)–Mr. Tamir Waser COS [REDACTED] CMO [REDACTED] DCOS [REDACTED] U.S. Ambassador to Russia–John Tefft CMO [REDACTED] U.S. Ambassador to Turkey–Ambassador Bass Chief of Staff to the President of the United States–Denis McDonough Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Intelligence Integration–Michael Dempsey CIA/CTMC–[REDACTED] Vice President of the United States–Joseph R. Biden
Last week, Acting DNI Rick Grenell declassified the list of individuals and delivered it to the DOJ. It was then unclear if the list would be made public. The DOJ said that they had no intention of releasing the names. DNI Grenell then sent The List to Senator Grassley(R-IA) and Senator Ron Johnson(R-WI), who then released it to the public.
Grenell appeared to have delivered those files to the DOJ last week. The declassified list showed recipients who “may have received Lt. Gen Flynn’s identity in response to a request processed between 8 November 2016 and 31 January 2017 to unmask an identity that had been generically referred to in an NSA foreign intelligence report,” the document, obtained by Fox News, read. “Each individual was an authorized recipient of the original report and the unmasking was approved through NSA’s standard process, which includes a review of the justification for the request,” the document said. “Only certain personnel are authorized to submit unmasking requests into the NSA system. In this case, 16 authorized individuals requested unmasking for [REDACTED] different NSA intelligence reports for select identified principals.” The document added: “While the principals are identified below, we cannot confirm hey saw the unmasked information. This response does not include any requests outside of the specified time-frame.” The list revealed that then-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power made unmasking requests seven times between Nov. 30, 2016 and Jan. 11, 2017. The list revealed that Clapper made three requests from Dec. 2, 2016 through Jan. 7, 2017; that Brennan made two requests, one on Dec. 14 and one on Dec. 15, 2016. Comey also made a request on Dec. 15, 2016. On Jan. 5, 2017, McDonough made one request, and on Jan. 12, 2017, then-Vice President Biden made one request. Source: Fox News
This comes at a really, really bad time as it was just yesterday morning that Democrat Hack Turned Serious Journalist™ George Stephanopoulos asked Sleepy Joe about this very thing and he flip-flopped on his response on live television.
"I know nothing about those moves [by the FBI] to investigate Michael Flynn," Joe Biden claimed. Reminded he was in a January 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting with President Obama and the FBI Director about investigating Flynn, Biden admits "I was aware… but that's all I know." pic.twitter.com/SImLNoqhd7 — Trump War Room – Text TRUMP to 88022 & get the APP (@TrumpWarRoom) May 12, 2020
Senator Rand Paul(R-KY) is on an absolute tear after the list was released:
BREAKING BOMBSHELL: Rand Paul: "Vice President Biden & more than a dozen Obama administration officials requested & received the power to unmask Flynn." "Unmasking involves revealing the identity of an American's private phone conversations without a constitutional warrant." pic.twitter.com/eRUUViCXE1 — Breaking911 (@Breaking911) May 13, 2020
Get ready, folks! Durham is still conducting his investigation, and this thing ain’t over yet!
It’s gonna get good…


clashdaily--2020-05-13--Open-Carry Restaurant In Colorado Opens Up Defying Cease And Desist Order

The owner tweeted , “ If you want freedom , you have to go out and take it.
” Colorado Governor Jared Polis ( D ) has said that the decision to reopen restaurants in the state and what precisely that would look like will be made on May 25 .
That ’ s quite a long time since the “ 30-day ” initial state-wide shutdown came into effect on March 17 .
How do businesses that rely on daily clients continue to survive a government shutdown that has persisted for 3 times longer than anticipated ?
Gov .
Polis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ open on May 25 , but the decision on when and how they will open will be made then .
Will they be permitted 50 percent capacity ?
30 percent ?
Less than that ?
No one knows .
Lauren Boebert , the owner of Shooter ’ s Grill in Rifle , Colorado , says that if her popular restaurant doesn ’ t open now , it may not open ever again .
In an effort to keep her small business going , she reopened the restaurant on Saturday .
Trending : HEY @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And Your Boy Brennan Knew It… Care To Comment ?
Shooter ’ s is an unusual gun-themed restaurant that allows the open-carry of firearms by customers as well as employees .
There ’ s a sign on the door that says , “ Guns are welcome on premises.
” Clearly , someone who owns a business like that isn ’ t going to like an infringement on their freedoms .
So far , Shooter ’ s has served between 300 and 400 customers .
Watch the Denver news report on this the reopening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to officials–the Sheriff , Chief of Police , public health , City of Rifle , commissioners–but didn ’ t get anywhere with any of that .
There was a whole lot of blame-shifting and nobody really knew who was in charge , so , as a business owner , she decided to take charge and open her business .
She can ’ t understand how some businesses are allowed to be open but others are not .
She also says that Garfield County has very low transmission of the virus , so she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should be held to the same standard as a region where the virus is widespread .
Boebert , who is running for Congress , posted a video explaining her reasoning : No one is forcing people to go to restaurants during a pandemic , but they are forcing businesses to close indefinitely with no real indication of what could allow them to reopen .
It also seems random that some can open with guidelines in place while others are not .
What do you think of Boebert ’ s decision to reopen ?

The owner tweeted, “If you want freedom, you have to go out and take it.”
Colorado Governor Jared Polis(D) has said that the decision to reopen restaurants in the state and what precisely that would look like will be made on May 25. That’s quite a long time since the “30-day” initial state-wide shutdown came into effect on March 17.
How do businesses that rely on daily clients continue to survive a government shutdown that has persisted for 3 times longer than anticipated? Gov. Polis isn’t saying that restaurants will open on May 25, but the decision on when and how they will open will be made then. Will they be permitted 50 percent capacity? 30 percent? Less than that? No one knows.
Lauren Boebert, the owner of Shooter’s Grill in Rifle, Colorado, says that if her popular restaurant doesn’t open now, it may not open ever again. In an effort to keep her small business going, she reopened the restaurant on Saturday.
Shooter’s is an unusual gun-themed restaurant that allows the open-carry of firearms by customers as well as employees. There’s a sign on the door that says, “Guns are welcome on premises.”
Clearly, someone who owns a business like that isn’t going to like an infringement on their freedoms.
Yesterday, I opened my restaurant in Rifle, CO. Small businesses everywhere deserve the chance to open up. We are the life blood of this nation’s economy. Thank you to #BikersForTrump and more for coming out and joining us at @ShootersGrill yesterday! ?? pic.twitter.com/4T2Icajl4G — Lauren Boebert for Congress (R-CO3) (@laurenboebert) May 10, 2020
The Garfield County Sheriff’s Office issued a cease and desist order on Tuesday. “There’s no difference into going into my restaurant for 20 minutes and someone going into a salon for an hour-and-a-half,” said Boebert. Boebert said she will do everything to keep her doors open and her staff employed. Source: CBS 4 Denver
So far, Shooter’s has served between 300 and 400 customers.
Watch the Denver news report on this the reopening:
Boebert says that she tried talking to officials–the Sheriff, Chief of Police, public health, City of Rifle, commissioners–but didn’t get anywhere with any of that. There was a whole lot of blame-shifting and nobody really knew who was in charge, so, as a business owner, she decided to take charge and open her business. She can’t understand how some businesses are allowed to be open but others are not. She also says that Garfield County has very low transmission of the virus, so she doesn’t believe that rural counties should be held to the same standard as a region where the virus is widespread.
Boebert, who is running for Congress, posted a video explaining her reasoning:
I’m not going to wait on the government to tell me what to do. The founders never had asterisks in the Constitution. If you want freedom, you have to go out and take it! Join My Team Here:https://t.co/l2IHcjY6tW pic.twitter.com/pk3iBBRoKQ — Lauren Boebert for Congress (R-CO3) (@laurenboebert) May 12, 2020
No one is forcing people to go to restaurants during a pandemic, but they are forcing businesses to close indefinitely with no real indication of what could allow them to reopen. It also seems random that some can open with guidelines in place while others are not.
What do you think of Boebert’s decision to reopen?


clashdaily--2020-05-13--Chelsea Clinton Parrots Chinese Propaganda To Criticize Trump–Twitter Takes Her To Truthtown

The Media ( D ) have been spouting CCP propaganda from the very beginning of the pandemic and leftists like Chelsea Clinton are happy to lend a hand .
After all , there ’ s a clear goal in mind here–make sure that President Trump looks less credible than the Chinese Communist Party .
Clearly , there are some leftists that are upset that communists didn ’ t win the Cold War , so they ’ re carrying water for one of the most brutal regimes in the history of mankind .
Yes , WaPo is taking its new slogan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to heart by deliberately covering up for the Chinese Communist Party .
Trending : HEY CNN : Putin Wanted Hillary To Win And Your Boy Brennan Knew It… Care To Comment ?
In a recent article , the Washington Post stated that Wuhan , where the COVID-19 coronavirus was first discovered , only has 6 new cases , but officials are preparing to test all 11 million residents over the next 10 days .
Anyone who has been paying any attention whatsoever realizes that these numbers are absolute garbage .
There is no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the spread of the virus so rapidly , even with their authoritarian tendencies .
Survivors and relatives of the deceased in Wuhan are being threatened and bribed to stay quiet about what happened and is continuing to happen in the city .
It ’ s interesting to note that some of the leftists in the media are trying to claim that President Trump ’ s reliance on tests is pointless , while also saying that he ’ s not testing enough .
Chelsea thought that this story–the massive ramp-up in testing in Wuhan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to just six new cases–is a great way to dunk on the Trump administration .
But Twitter users weren ’ t going to let Chelsea get away with it .
They blasted her for believing China ’ s bogus numbers .
In the back-and-forth of pointing out that China has been lying from the get-go and the ubiquitous “ Orange Man Bad ” responses by leftists , there was this one tweet that stood out apart from the others .
It was a reasonable , thoughtful response that is ( unfortunately ) uncharacteristic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seem to believe the CCP .
That ’ s the problem .
They believe the CCP rather than the President of the United States .
If that ’ s not the worst example of Trump Derangement Syndrome , I don ’ t know what is .

The Media(D) have been spouting CCP propaganda from the very beginning of the pandemic and leftists like Chelsea Clinton are happy to lend a hand.
After all, there’s a clear goal in mind here–make sure that President Trump looks less credible than the Chinese Communist Party. Clearly, there are some leftists that are upset that communists didn’t win the Cold War, so they’re carrying water for one of the most brutal regimes in the history of mankind.
Enter Chelsea Clinton and The Washington Post.
Yes, WaPo is taking its new slogan, “Democracy Dies In Darkness” to heart by deliberately covering up for the Chinese Communist Party.
In a recent article, the Washington Post stated that Wuhan, where the COVID-19 coronavirus was first discovered, only has 6 new cases, but officials are preparing to test all 11 million residents over the next 10 days.
Anyone who has been paying any attention whatsoever realizes that these numbers are absolute garbage.
There is no possible way that China managed to stop the spread of the virus so rapidly, even with their authoritarian tendencies. Survivors and relatives of the deceased in Wuhan are being threatened and bribed to stay quiet about what happened and is continuing to happen in the city.
It’s interesting to note that some of the leftists in the media are trying to claim that President Trump’s reliance on tests is pointless, while also saying that he’s not testing enough.
Chelsea thought that this story–the massive ramp-up in testing in Wuhan over a short period of time due to just six new cases–is a great way to dunk on the Trump administration.
Trump said yesterday that this week the U.S. will have performed 10 million #COVID19 tests – over more than three months. Wuhan is planning to perform 11 million tests in 10 days. https://t.co/jZKbxDiYpV — Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) May 12, 2020
But Twitter users weren’t going to let Chelsea get away with it.
They blasted her for believing China’s bogus numbers.
Of course you believe China. — InMyHumbleOpinion (@IMHO1969) May 12, 2020
And of course what China says is true. Like for example the lack of the threat of the virus in January or it’s origins, right? — Brian Mudd (@brianmuddradio) May 12, 2020
Your faith in the Chinese Communist Party is noted — Keith Maniac, from Guatemala (@CutItOutPutin) May 12, 2020
Chelsea and the CCP sitting in a tree P R O P A G A N D A — Kevin Dalton (@NextLAMayor) May 12, 2020
I’m sure its easy for them to “mass test” in a communist country since citizens are already connected to a “social credit” system. Are you suggesting we should have the same system? — COSMIC?M45 (@CosmicM45) May 12, 2020
China thanks you for your service. — IamMoose (@MooseMilk1985) May 12, 2020
Xi says, “Thanks for having our backs, big gal!” pic.twitter.com/RuviTLILAN — Phineas Fahrquar (@irishspy) May 12, 2020
In the back-and-forth of pointing out that China has been lying from the get-go and the ubiquitous “Orange Man Bad” responses by leftists, there was this one tweet that stood out apart from the others. It was a reasonable, thoughtful response that is (unfortunately) uncharacteristic of normal Twitter discourse.
Does anyone believe anything the CCP says though? Seems highly unlikely they can achieve this number and even more unlikely that the results will be of much relevance given many countries have returned China’s Covid tests and there is not yet a reliable antibody test — Ali (@2020Smiles) May 12, 2020
American journalists seem to believe the CCP. That’s the problem. They believe the CCP rather than the President of the United States.
If that’s not the worst example of Trump Derangement Syndrome, I don’t know what is.


clashdaily--2020-05-13--WTF? Gov. Jay Inslee Wants Restaurants To Keep A Log Of Customers When Washington State Allows Reope

WTF? Gov. Jay Inslee Wants Restaurants To Keep A Log Of Customers When Washington State Allows Reopening

“ Would you like a side order of governmental overreach with that ?
” In Washington , servers won ’ t even need to ask .
As Washington state begins the second phase of its 4-phase reopening process , restaurants who offer dine-in services are being required to adhere to draconian rules if they want to be open to the public .
So says the office of Washington Governor and former Democratic Presidential contender , Jay Inslee .
One of the new rules includes creating a “ daily log ” of customers who are dining in .
The log will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to include customer ’ s names , contact information , and the date and time that they were in the establishment .
This is to “ lay the groundwork ” so that the customer can be traced if the state government decides to start tracking its citizens .
Washington Gov .
Jay Inslee ’ s office on Monday issued a set of coronavirus requirements that restaurants must abide by when they reopen , one of which requires them to create a “ daily log ” of their customers ’ comings and goings .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a four-phase plan to reopen businesses in the state .
Restaurants that want to offer dine-in services must “ create a daily log of customers and maintain that daily log for 30 days , including telephone/email contact information , and time in , ” according to The Seattle Times .
Trending : HEY CNN : Putin Wanted Hillary To Win And Your Boy Brennan Knew It… Care To Comment ?
The measure is said to lay the groundwork for a trace program if the government decides to start tracking the movement of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that have been outlined by the state for dine-in service : • Hand sanitizer should be available at entry for all staff and patrons ( assuming supply availability ) .
• No bar seating is permitted during Phase 2 .
If an establishment has bar seating it must be closed off to prohibit use .
• If the establishment does not offer table service , they must have protocols in place to ensure adequate social distancing at food and drink pick-up stations , and seating within their dining area .
• All parties @ @ @ @ @ @ @ less .
• Guest occupancy must be 50 % of maximum building occupancy or lower as determined by the fire code .
Outdoor seating is permitted but must also be at 50 % capacity .
Outdoor seating does not count toward the building occupancy limit .
Outdoor seating must follow all other requirements in this document .
• Tables must be placed far enough apart when measured from occupied chair to occupied chair , to ensure dine-in guests seated at a table are a minimum of 6 feet away from guests at adjacent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ physical barrier or wall separating booths or tables .
• It is strongly suggested customers wear a cloth face covering anytime they are not seated at the table ( while being seated or leaving , or while going to the restroom ) .
8 .
Buffets and salad bars are not permitted at this time but may be addressed through subsequent interpretive guidance .
• If the establishment offers table service , create a daily log of all customers and maintain that daily log for 30 days , including telephone/email contact information , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any contact tracing that might need to occur .
• Any condiments typically left on the table ( ketchup , soy sauce , etc . )
must be single-use or sanitized after each use .
• Restaurants must have implemented a plan to ensure proper physical distancing in lobby/waiting areas/payment counters .
• Minimize the number of staff serving any given table .
It is strongly recommended that one staff person take a table ’ s order , bring all of their beverages/food/utensils , take their payment , etc .
Not included in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the daily screening of employees for the coronavirus before their shift begins .
Does this seem Constitutional to you ?
Can the government demand that private businesses–restaurants , at that–keep a log of their customers that can be requested at will by authorities ?
It seems like Washingtonians might be subjected to this kind of thing if they want to grab a cheeseburger at some greasy spoon : Washington state is at least being honest that they ’ re considering tracking their own citizens just like the Chinese government does .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) anonymized data that is already being gathered by Google and Apple , this is with names , phone numbers , email addresses .
Why would a restaurant comply with this for the privilege of reopening with restrictions ?
Simple : desperation .
The government knows it , so we ’ ve got some tinpot dictator wannabes like Inslee slipping on the jackboots and attempting to squash freedom under the guise of “ public health.
” It ’ s clear that these authoritarians don ’ t trust their own citizenry and want to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you notice that seems to be the go-to for these ( mostly ) Democrat governors ?
If a grocery store or a big box store can open safely without the same restrictive measures , surely pizza place can do it , too .

“Would you like a side order of governmental overreach with that?” In Washington, servers won’t even need to ask.
As Washington state begins the second phase of its 4-phase reopening process, restaurants who offer dine-in services are being required to adhere to draconian rules if they want to be open to the public. So says the office of Washington Governor and former Democratic Presidential contender, Jay Inslee.
One of the new rules includes creating a “daily log” of customers who are dining in. The log will be kept for 30 days and is to include customer’s names, contact information, and the date and time that they were in the establishment. This is to “lay the groundwork” so that the customer can be traced if the state government decides to start tracking its citizens.
Washington Gov. Jay Inslee’s office on Monday issued a set of coronavirus requirements that restaurants must abide by when they reopen, one of which requires them to create a “daily log” of their customers’ comings and goings. The state is now entering phase two of a four-phase plan to reopen businesses in the state. Restaurants that want to offer dine-in services must “create a daily log of customers and maintain that daily log for 30 days, including telephone/email contact information, and time in,” according to The Seattle Times. The measure is said to lay the groundwork for a trace program if the government decides to start tracking the movement of its citizens. Source: Fox News
There are 13 requirements that have been outlined by the state for dine-in service:
Hand sanitizer should be available at entry for all staff and patrons (assuming supply availability). No bar seating is permitted during Phase 2. If an establishment has bar seating it must be closed off to prohibit use. If the establishment does not offer table service, they must have protocols in place to ensure adequate social distancing at food and drink pick-up stations, and seating within their dining area. All parties and tables must be 5 guests or less. Guest occupancy must be 50% of maximum building occupancy or lower as determined by the fire code. Outdoor seating is permitted but must also be at 50% capacity. Outdoor seating does not count toward the building occupancy limit. Outdoor seating must follow all other requirements in this document. Tables must be placed far enough apart when measured from occupied chair to occupied chair, to ensure dine-in guests seated at a table are a minimum of 6 feet away from guests at adjacent table, or there must be a physical barrier or wall separating booths or tables. It is strongly suggested customers wear a cloth face covering anytime they are not seated at the table (while being seated or leaving, or while going to the restroom). 8. Buffets and salad bars are not permitted at this time but may be addressed through subsequent interpretive guidance. If the establishment offers table service, create a daily log of all customers and maintain that daily log for 30 days, including telephone/email contact information, and time in. This will facilitate any contact tracing that might need to occur. Single-use menus are required for in-person dining. Any condiments typically left on the table (ketchup, soy sauce, etc.) must be single-use or sanitized after each use. Restaurants must have implemented a plan to ensure proper physical distancing in lobby/waiting areas/payment counters. Minimize the number of staff serving any given table. It is strongly recommended that one staff person take a table’s order, bring all of their beverages/food/utensils, take their payment, etc.
Not included in the list, but still required, is the daily screening of employees for the coronavirus before their shift begins.
Does this seem Constitutional to you? Can the government demand that private businesses–restaurants, at that–keep a log of their customers that can be requested at will by authorities?
It seems like Washingtonians might be subjected to this kind of thing if they want to grab a cheeseburger at some greasy spoon:
Washington state is at least being honest that they’re considering tracking their own citizens just like the Chinese government does. This isn’t even the (allegedly) anonymized data that is already being gathered by Google and Apple, this is with names, phone numbers, email addresses.
Why would a restaurant comply with this for the privilege of reopening with restrictions? Simple: desperation. The government knows it, so we’ve got some tinpot dictator wannabes like Inslee slipping on the jackboots and attempting to squash freedom under the guise of “public health.”
It’s clear that these authoritarians don’t trust their own citizenry and want to impose regulations to restrict freedoms. Do you notice that seems to be the go-to for these (mostly) Democrat governors?
If a grocery store or a big box store can open safely without the same restrictive measures, surely pizza place can do it, too.


clashdaily--2020-05-13--All Roads Lead To Obama

All Roads Lead To Obama

At the end of his term , President Obama boasted , “ We didn ’ t have a scandal that embarrassed us.
” As we are finding out this week , that comment holds the same veracity as when Obama proclaimed , “ If you like your doctor , you can keep your doctor.
” He lied about keeping your doctor and he ’ s lied about scandals , too .
Attorney General William Barr ’ s courageous and bold move to drop the charges against Lt. General Michael Flynn has unearthed for public consumption a host of interesting and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s get a quick overview of what happened .
The Department of Justice , about a week ago , dismissed the prosecution of Michael Flynn , who briefly served as President Trump ’ s first national security adviser .
Andrew McCarthy explains why , “ In all the heated commentary over this decision , scant attention has been paid to the most compelling reason for vacating Flynn ’ s 2017 guilty plea to one count of making false statements to FBI agents : The government wouldn ’ t have a prayer of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on to add that an initial investigation into Flynn which began in August of 2016 was closed in January 4 , 2017 , a full twenty days before his infamous FBI interview .
There was nothing found in that initial six-month investigation .
Nothing .
Trending : HEY CNN : Putin Wanted Hillary To Win And Your Boy Brennan Knew It… Care To Comment ?
Simply put , Comey ’ s FBI interviewed ( or entrapped ) Flynn based on a false premise .
McCarthy notes , “ agents went out of their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the interview , at which they hoped to trip him up.
” Aside from correcting the injustice to Lt. Gen. Flynn and reiterating that President Trump was right , why does this matter ?
It matters because of where this all leads .
Joe Concha notes , “ The Wall Street Journal ’ s editorial board is asking why former President Obama commented on the Justice Department ’ s decision to drop the case against former national security adviser Michael Flynn , asking ‘ what he ’ s really worried about.
’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wall Street Journal editorial board ponders , that Obama is “ eager to distort the truth ” ahead of an investigation being conducted by U.S. Attorney John Durham into the origins of the Russia investigation ?
There are lots of questions that need to be addressed .
Who was behind the drive to get rid of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn , even though there was nothing wrong with his recorded conversation with the Russian ambassador ?
Who knew what was going on ?
Who unmasked Flynn in the first place and leaked it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they so determined to get Flynn out of the administration ?
Here ’ s some of what ’ s known .
There was a January 5 , 2017 meeting at the White House in which President Obama talked with then-FBI Director Jim Comey and then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates .
It ’ s been shown , from her testimony to the Mueller team , that Yates was surprised Obama was aware of the details of then-incoming national security adviser Michael Flynn ’ s intercepted December 2016 phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Flynn ?
Fox News reports , “ Obama personally had warned the Trump administration against hiring Flynn , and made clear he was ‘ not a fan , ’ according to multiple officials .
Obama had fired Flynn as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency in 2014.
” That might be it , but it does leave questions .
If Obama was aware of the baseless attack against Flynn , what else did he know about ?
Is there more to it ?
Was Obama aware of what Comey , Clapper , Brennan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Did he authorize it ?
FBI texts seem to indicate something .
Remember the Strzok/Page text that read , “ Obama wants to know everything we ’ re doing ?
” What does seem clear is Obama ’ s FBI , CIA , Department of Justice , director of national intelligence , and White House national security team were all involved in extensive , illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign and presidential transition .
It continued after Trump took office , thanks to holdover officials and anti-Trump bureaucrats .
We ’ ll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this goes .
Of course , it is important to note that Joe Biden was asked about all of this on Good Morning America on May 12 , 2020 .
Initially , he denied knowing about any of it saying to George Stephanopoulos , “ I know nothing about those moves to investigate Michael Flynn.
” Later in the same interview , when Stephanopoulos reminded Biden he ’ d been at a January 5 , 2017 meeting in the Oval Office , Biden suddenly remembered , “ I was aware that there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ investigation , but that ’ s all I know about.
” He claimed to have misunderstood the question .
Maybe he did .
I can believe that .
Attorney General William Barr and Special Prosecutor John Durham may have much more to say in the coming days .
For now , it does seem as if all roads lead to Obama .

At the end of his term, President Obama boasted, “We didn’t have a scandal that embarrassed us.” As we are finding out this week, that comment holds the same veracity as when Obama proclaimed, “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.”
He lied about keeping your doctor and he’s lied about scandals, too. Attorney General William Barr’s courageous and bold move to drop the charges against Lt. General Michael Flynn has unearthed for public consumption a host of interesting and sordid revelations about his case. Let’s get a quick overview of what happened.
The Department of Justice, about a week ago, dismissed the prosecution of Michael Flynn, who briefly served as President Trump’s first national security adviser. Andrew McCarthy explains why, “In all the heated commentary over this decision, scant attention has been paid to the most compelling reason for vacating Flynn’s 2017 guilty plea to one count of making false statements to FBI agents: The government wouldn’t have a prayer of convicting Flynn at trial.”
He goes on to add that an initial investigation into Flynn which began in August of 2016 was closed in January 4, 2017, a full twenty days before his infamous FBI interview. There was nothing found in that initial six-month investigation. Nothing.
Simply put, Comey’s FBI interviewed (or entrapped) Flynn based on a false premise. McCarthy notes, “agents went out of their way to deceive Flynn about the purpose of the interview, at which they hoped to trip him up.”
Aside from correcting the injustice to Lt. Gen. Flynn and reiterating that President Trump was right, why does this matter? It matters because of where this all leads.
Joe Concha notes, “The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board is asking why former President Obama commented on the Justice Department’s decision to drop the case against former national security adviser Michael Flynn, asking ‘what he’s really worried about.’”
Is it possible, as the Wall Street Journal editorial board ponders, that Obama is “eager to distort the truth” ahead of an investigation being conducted by U.S. Attorney John Durham into the origins of the Russia investigation?
There are lots of questions that need to be addressed.
Who was behind the drive to get rid of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, even though there was nothing wrong with his recorded conversation with the Russian ambassador? Who knew what was going on? Who unmasked Flynn in the first place and leaked it to Washington Post reporters? Why were they so determined to get Flynn out of the administration?
Here’s some of what’s known. There was a January 5, 2017 meeting at the White House in which President Obama talked with then-FBI Director Jim Comey and then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates.
It’s been shown, from her testimony to the Mueller team, that Yates was surprised Obama was aware of the details of then-incoming national security adviser Michael Flynn’s intercepted December 2016 phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
Did Obama have it in for Flynn? Fox News reports, “Obama personally had warned the Trump administration against hiring Flynn, and made clear he was ‘not a fan,’ according to multiple officials. Obama had fired Flynn as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency in 2014.”
That might be it, but it does leave questions. If Obama was aware of the baseless attack against Flynn, what else did he know about? Is there more to it? Was Obama aware of what Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Strzok, and Page were doing? Did he authorize it?
FBI texts seem to indicate something. Remember the Strzok/Page text that read, “Obama wants to know everything we’re doing?”
What does seem clear is Obama’s FBI, CIA, Department of Justice, director of national intelligence, and White House national security team were all involved in extensive, illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign and presidential transition. It continued after Trump took office, thanks to holdover officials and anti-Trump bureaucrats.
We’ll have to wait and see where all of this goes. Of course, it is important to note that Joe Biden was asked about all of this on Good Morning America on May 12, 2020. Initially, he denied knowing about any of it saying to George Stephanopoulos, “I know nothing about those moves to investigate Michael Flynn.”
Later in the same interview, when Stephanopoulos reminded Biden he’d been at a January 5, 2017 meeting in the Oval Office, Biden suddenly remembered, “I was aware that there was, that they asked for an investigation, but that’s all I know about.” He claimed to have misunderstood the question. Maybe he did. I can believe that.
Attorney General William Barr and Special Prosecutor John Durham may have much more to say in the coming days. For now, it does seem as if all roads lead to Obama.


clashdaily--2020-05-14--WATCH: Barstool Sports Founder Asks ‘When Did Flattening The Curve Turn Into Finding A Cure?’

Not every media personality has gone ‘ all-in ’ with the media mantra of hiding in a bunker until the world stops being a dangerous place to live .
Because — news flash !
— it will ALWAYS be a dangerous place to live .
Trending : HEY CNN : Putin Wanted Hillary To Win And Your Boy Brennan Knew It… Care To Comment ?
So when our health care ‘ experts ’ pop out of their hsole , see their own sh , adow and declare we ’ ve got six more weeks of shutdown , more and more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ version of ‘ oh , HELL no !
’ Barstool Sports has a viral video is resonating with a lot of people out there , where he goes on an epic rant about the ridiculous ( and changing ! )
rationale behind the lockdown .
Barstool founder Dave Portnoy , known by fans as “ El Presidente , ” went viral Wednesday on Twitter with a profane rant fighting back against coronavirus lockdowns .
Entitled “ Emergency Press Conference – When Did Flattening The Curve Turn Into Finding The Cure , ” Portnoy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ confused over whether to stay home or go back out in the world to make a living .
“ I would rather die of corona… or take my chances… I don ’ t want to start over , ” he yelled .
“ There are no great options but you can ’ t just decimate the entire economy.
” Watch the whole rant , but be warned that the language is a bit spicy .
The nanny-state can ’ t hold our hands forever .
It ’ s got to come to an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the tide of public opinion is finally beginning to turn against the hide-under-the-bed crowd .

Not every media personality has gone ‘all-in’ with the media mantra of hiding in a bunker until the world stops being a dangerous place to live.
Because — news flash! — it will ALWAYS be a dangerous place to live.
Period.
End of story.
So when our health care ‘experts’ pop out of their hsole, see their own sh,adow and declare we’ve got six more weeks of shutdown, more and more the answer is going to be some version of ‘oh, HELL no!’
Barstool Sports has a viral video is resonating with a lot of people out there, where he goes on an epic rant about the ridiculous (and changing!) rationale behind the lockdown.
Barstool founder Dave Portnoy, known by fans as “El Presidente,” went viral Wednesday on Twitter with a profane rant fighting back against coronavirus lockdowns. Entitled “Emergency Press Conference – When Did Flattening The Curve Turn Into Finding The Cure,” Portnoy emotionally warned about the plight of Americans confused over whether to stay home or go back out in the world to make a living. “I would rather die of corona… or take my chances… I don’t want to start over,” he yelled. “There are no great options but you can’t just decimate the entire economy.” Source: Fox News
Watch the whole rant, but be warned that the language is a bit spicy.
(I’d say the language is ‘NSFW’, but, well, most of us are working from home these days, so just make sure your kids are doing their online learning in another room.)
Emergency Press Conference – When Did Flattening The Curve Turn Into Finding The Cure pic.twitter.com/ZaSTxL6Tuc — Dave Portnoy (@stoolpresidente) May 14, 2020
The nanny-state can’t hold our hands forever. It’s got to come to an end sometime — and it looks like the tide of public opinion is finally beginning to turn against the hide-under-the-bed crowd.
It’s. About. Damned. Time.


clashdaily--2020-05-14--‘Moderate’ Biden Names AOC As A Co-Chair Of His Climate Change Task Force–Here’s The 411

Remember when the DNC bum-rushed Bernie out of contention so that ‘ moderate ’ Joe Biden could get the nom ?
And they thought we ’ d all buy it ?
That ’ s adorable .
Do these MENSA candidate strategists have the memory of a goldfish , or do they think the public does ?
Because now ‘ moderate ’ Joe Biden is building his ‘ dream team ’ .
Remember the Big-Time Bernie surrogate from The Squad ?
No , not Ilhan Omar , the other one .
The one who popped off about how she and Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same party ?
That ’ s right .
Alexandria Occasional-Cortex .
So deep are her personal convictions that she ’ s being picked for a role on Joe ’ s team , even though a short four months ago she made headlines by saying : Trending : HEY CNN : Putin Wanted Hillary To Win And Your Boy Brennan Knew It… Care To Comment ?
Asked for a profile by New York Magazine about what role she might play as a member of Congress should Biden capture the White House , the freshman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a groan .
“ Oh God , ” she said .
“ In any other country , Joe Biden and I would not be in the same party , but in America , we are.
” —Politico For someone who bleats so loudly about everyone else being in somebody ’ s pocket , she sure sells out easily given a whiff of a chance at wielding real political power .
Can you guess what her role will be ?
If you guessed ‘ New Green Deal Advocate ’ , you ’ re right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a panel advising Joe Biden on climate policy as the apparent Democratic nominee takes steps to unify the party , it was announced on Wednesday .
Biden said that Ocasio-Cortez is on one of the six policy panels in comments to Las Vegas CBS affiliate KLAS-TV on Tuesday , when the former vice president was asked what he was doing to bring supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders into the fold .
“ We ’ ve made some changes , we ’ ve listened to the Bernie supporters and , you know , for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she is on one of the panels as well , ” Biden said .
“ And so I think we ’ re going to have a very united party.
” —NBC We ’ ve seen what a ‘ united party ’ looks like to a Bernie Supporter , haven ’ t we ?
After all , AOC has refused to pay party dues and has threatened her own party members with being Primaried for not being sufficiently Leftist .
A United Party means that they bow and kiss the Democrat Socialist ring .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the supposedly ‘ moderate ’ Democrat alternative to Bernie is ACTUALLY a false face on movement that has been ideologically hijacked by team Bernie Bro .
If you thought that America could ill afford the crushing costs of the ‘ Democratic Socialist ’ utopian vision BEFORE the Wuhan Chinese Coronavirus gutted our economy , how much STRONGER does that objection become now that the cupboard is bare ?
If her vision of tomorrow was fully implemented , the comparisons to a Venezuelan economic future would be anything but hypothetical .
If you think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , just wait until she unveils her Green New Deal .

Remember when the DNC bum-rushed Bernie out of contention so that ‘moderate’ Joe Biden could get the nom? And they thought we’d all buy it? That’s adorable.
Do these MENSA candidate strategists have the memory of a goldfish, or do they think the public does? Because now ‘moderate’ Joe Biden is building his ‘dream team’.
Remember the Big-Time Bernie surrogate from The Squad? No, not Ilhan Omar, the other one. The one who popped off about how she and Biden shouldn’t even be in the same party?
That’s right. Alexandria Occasional-Cortex. So deep are her personal convictions that she’s being picked for a role on Joe’s team, even though a short four months ago she made headlines by saying:
Asked for a profile by New York Magazine about what role she might play as a member of Congress should Biden capture the White House, the freshman House Democrat from New York responded with a groan. “Oh God,” she said. “In any other country, Joe Biden and I would not be in the same party, but in America, we are.” —Politico
For someone who bleats so loudly about everyone else being in somebody’s pocket, she sure sells out easily given a whiff of a chance at wielding real political power.
Can you guess what her role will be? If you guessed ‘New Green Deal Advocate’, you’re right!
Progressive Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will co-chair a panel advising Joe Biden on climate policy as the apparent Democratic nominee takes steps to unify the party, it was announced on Wednesday. Biden said that Ocasio-Cortez is on one of the six policy panels in comments to Las Vegas CBS affiliate KLAS-TV on Tuesday, when the former vice president was asked what he was doing to bring supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders into the fold. “We’ve made some changes, we’ve listened to the Bernie supporters and, you know, for example, we have congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez, she is on one of the panels as well,” Biden said. “And so I think we’re going to have a very united party.” —NBC
We’ve seen what a ‘united party’ looks like to a Bernie Supporter, haven’t we? After all, AOC has refused to pay party dues and has threatened her own party members with being Primaried for not being sufficiently Leftist.
A United Party means that they bow and kiss the Democrat Socialist ring.
This is a serious red flag that the supposedly ‘moderate’ Democrat alternative to Bernie is ACTUALLY a false face on movement that has been ideologically hijacked by team Bernie Bro.
If you thought that America could ill afford the crushing costs of the ‘Democratic Socialist’ utopian vision BEFORE the Wuhan Chinese Coronavirus gutted our economy, how much STRONGER does that objection become now that the cupboard is bare?
If her vision of tomorrow was fully implemented, the comparisons to a Venezuelan economic future would be anything but hypothetical.
If you think COVID was disruptive to the supply chain, just wait until she unveils her Green New Deal.
Related…
This was AOC’s big priority in February… long AFTER the Coronavirus had become an issue.
AOC’s BIG Announcement — Launching A Rebel Group To Primary Moderate Dems
Just one month earlier, while impeachment was the big story, she made news by stiffing her own party…
‘DEADBEAT AOC’ Makes Accidental Case Against Compulsory Union Membership


clashdaily--2020-05-14--Tucker Carlson: Gaps In Flynn Unmasking Documents May Hint At Criminal Charges

Durham has explicitly said his investigation has become a criminal investigation .
Could that explain the redacted names on the unmasking list ?
Yesterday , ‘ The List ’ finally dropped , revealing the names and titles of persons who have had access to the unmasking of surveillance pertaining to General Flynn .
You can find the full list here : Obama Officials Involved In Flynn ‘ Unmasking ’ Have Been Named–Here ’ s The 411 Fox News host Tucker Carlson reported that “ relevant information ” is missing from the declassified memo on Obama administration officials who received information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ targeting retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn .
During his opening monologue , as he discussed the leaks of classified details of Flynn ’ s contacts with a Russian envoy , Carlson said this is an indicator that a grand jury has been impaneled .
Trending : HEY CNN : Putin Wanted Hillary To Win And Your Boy Brennan Knew It… Care To Comment ?
“ According to a knowledgeable source , a portion of the relevant information is missing from this latest document release , ” Carlson said on his show on Wednesday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a sign that some evidence is now in the hands of a grand jury impaneled to consider charges against whoever did this.
” He added a disclaimer , saying , “ We don ’ t know that ’ s true , we certainly hope it is.
” Sixteen officials made unmasking requests that pertained to Flynn in the time period between the 2016 election and President Trump ’ s inauguration .
This list , which was part of a memo released by GOP senators on Wednesday , has dozens of names , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ requests or who among these people looked at the information .
—Examiner For those of us getting impatient with waiting for proverbial heads to roll for obvious malfeasance , this could mean a glimmer of hope .
Or , like Groundhog Day , it could just mean six more weeks of putting money in that swear jar every time we read the news .
And let ’ s be honest — at this point , some of us are going to need a bigger swear jar .

Durham has explicitly said his investigation has become a criminal investigation. Could that explain the redacted names on the unmasking list?
Yesterday, ‘The List’ finally dropped, revealing the names and titles of persons who have had access to the unmasking of surveillance pertaining to General Flynn. You can find the full list here: Obama Officials Involved In Flynn ‘Unmasking’ Have Been Named–Here’s The 411
Fox News host Tucker Carlson reported that “relevant information” is missing from the declassified memo on Obama administration officials who received information in response to “unmasking” requests targeting retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. During his opening monologue, as he discussed the leaks of classified details of Flynn’s contacts with a Russian envoy, Carlson said this is an indicator that a grand jury has been impaneled. “According to a knowledgeable source, a portion of the relevant information is missing from this latest document release,” Carlson said on his show on Wednesday. “Now, that could be a sign that some evidence is now in the hands of a grand jury impaneled to consider charges against whoever did this.” He added a disclaimer, saying, “We don’t know that’s true, we certainly hope it is.” Sixteen officials made unmasking requests that pertained to Flynn in the time period between the 2016 election and President Trump’s inauguration. This list, which was part of a memo released by GOP senators on Wednesday, has dozens of names, and it is not clear who made the requests or who among these people looked at the information. —Examiner
For those of us getting impatient with waiting for proverbial heads to roll for obvious malfeasance, this could mean a glimmer of hope.
Or, like Groundhog Day, it could just mean six more weeks of putting money in that swear jar every time we read the news.
And let’s be honest — at this point, some of us are going to need a bigger swear jar.


clashdaily--2020-05-14--WATCH: Kevin James’s New Short Film Parodies The COVID Tyranny In Many Parts Of America

At least someone in Hollywood can see that there are problems with the “ new normal.
” During the pandemic , it seems that all of the ( mostly leftwing ) authoritarians came out of the woodwork to impose ridiculous restrictions on freedoms under the guise of a “ public health emergency.
” We ’ ve seen churches closed indefinitely , That Woman In Michigan™ restrict the sale of seeds and gardening supplies that were on store shelves ; parents arrested and handcuffed for taking their kids to a playground ; one-way “ social distancing ” sidewalks ; a hairstylist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to earn a living ; the SWAT team along with the rotund members of the Odessa Sheriff ’ s Office deployed to arrest a handful of anti-lockdown protesters ; restriction of “ window visits ” at nursing homes ; restaurants in Washington state are being required to log their customers in preparation for tracking citizens ’ movements–and that ’ s just the beginning .
There are so many more examples of outrageous overreach–like deploying police helicopters to catch people grabbing a beer on a roof , or telling California beachgoers to get off @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rise of the COVIDictators .
Trending : HEY CNN : Putin Wanted Hillary To Win And Your Boy Brennan Knew It… Care To Comment ?
And they ’ re enlisting the masses to help them out with snitch lines and rewards .
In his latest short film , James parodies the reality that many in America–and around the world–now find themselves in .
It ’ s a strange New World that many of us don ’ t understand .
Yes , the masked , gloved , sanitized COVIDiots are out there just waiting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ standing on the “ social distancing ” marker outside of a business or going the wrong way down the grocery store aisle .
You ’ ll get lectured if you ’ re not wearing a mask .
Neighbors look out their windows when a car pulls up into your driveway to see if you invite the visitors inside .
God alone help you if you shake someone ’ s hand out of reflex .
This doesn ’ t feel like America , and Kevin James captures that same Cold War in East Berlin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all .
This might be a parody , but it doesn ’ t seem to be all that far from reality these days .
Expect a fact-check from Snopes in the near future .

At least someone in Hollywood can see that there are problems with the “new normal.”
During the pandemic, it seems that all of the (mostly leftwing) authoritarians came out of the woodwork to impose ridiculous restrictions on freedoms under the guise of a “public health emergency.”
We’ve seen churches closed indefinitely, That Woman In Michigan™ restrict the sale of seeds and gardening supplies that were on store shelves; parents arrested and handcuffed for taking their kids to a playground; one-way “social distancing” sidewalks; a hairstylist in Dallas arrested and fined for trying to earn a living; the SWAT team along with the rotund members of the Odessa Sheriff’s Office deployed to arrest a handful of anti-lockdown protesters; restriction of “window visits” at nursing homes; restaurants in Washington state are being required to log their customers in preparation for tracking citizens’ movements–and that’s just the beginning. There are so many more examples of outrageous overreach–like deploying police helicopters to catch people grabbing a beer on a roof, or telling California beachgoers to get off the beach.
It’s the rise of the COVIDictators.
And they’re enlisting the masses to help them out with snitch lines and rewards.
In his latest short film, James parodies the reality that many in America–and around the world–now find themselves in.
It’s a strange New World that many of us don’t understand.
Watch Out of Touch:
Yes, the masked, gloved, sanitized COVIDiots are out there just waiting for you to slip up by not standing on the “social distancing” marker outside of a business or going the wrong way down the grocery store aisle. You’ll get lectured if you’re not wearing a mask. Neighbors look out their windows when a car pulls up into your driveway to see if you invite the visitors inside. God alone help you if you shake someone’s hand out of reflex.
This doesn’t feel like America, and Kevin James captures that same Cold War in East Berlin feeling that has taken hold of us all.
This might be a parody, but it doesn’t seem to be all that far from reality these days.
Expect a fact-check from Snopes in the near future.


clashdaily--2020-05-14--The GLOVES ARE OFF: Trump Tweet Calls For Obama To Testify Over OBAMAGATE Scandal… Under Oath

Has the smoking gun of this January 5th , 2017 meeting exposed the REAL Obama ?
And will he be called upon to explain himself under oath ?
It ’ s been the elephant in the room from the moment we knew about this quiet coup attempt against Trump : Where Did Obama fit in this drama ?
With the obvious direct involvement of so many Presidential Appointees in the Flynn and Spygate scandals from the beginning , many of us have long assumed that Obama was right in the thick of things .
It wasn ’ t clear whether @ @ @ @ @ @ @ merely looking on approvingly , but there was no way all of this was happening without his knowledge .
What ’ s more , the Page/Strzok texts have proven to be a goldmine of damning conversations .
Some of them are particularly interesting .
Trending : Open-Carry Restaurant In Colorado Opens Up Defying Cease And Desist Order “ The White House is running this , ” for one .
“ POTUS wants to know everything we are doing , ” for another .
It brings us right back to that infamous question , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and when did he know it ?
” Obviously , Obama isn ’ t worried about getting ousted from the White House .
But that doesn ’ t change the fact that political malfeasance — if it did occur — requires some sort of a remedy to set it right .
Otherwise , we risk political malfeasance becoming acceptable as the new normal .
If a crime was committed , a price must be paid .
Trump has some thoughts on that topic : There ’ s a new hashtag and everything : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it happening ?
Judging by Lindsey Graham ’ s reaction : the odds are ‘ slim and none ’ .
( And slim ’ s outta town . )
There ’ s a good chance that crossing that Rubicon of pressing charges against a former President is a bridge too far for many in D.C. — They fear setting a dangerous precedent .
They may fear opening up the possibility of every president from now until the end of time being bullied in the courts after their time in office as a punishment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agendas .
It seems like this is a dead end .
But there might be other ways to settle the matter .
Once the Durham investigation has run its course , we ’ ll have a much more detailed picture of who did what , to whom , and when .
This opens up a couple of other options .
The obvious first option is civil litigation on the part of wronged parties — Flynn , Papadopoulos , Page , Stone , and perhaps even Manafort could have potential standing for such a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ political in nature , it would be an explicit redressing of wrongs suffered .
The second possible option , ( if there is legal provision for it ) would hinge on Republicans getting a big win in November .
Use the Durham investigation findings ( if they are as damning as we suspect they are ) as the basis for a formal impeachment so that his name and legacy would be forever marred by having his wrongdoing indelibly connected to his office in a way that no amount of historical revisionism could obscure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the other abuses that the press refused to cover — for example , weaponizing IRS against his political rivals , Fast and Furious , spying on the Senate , his mistreatment of journalists , and Project Cassandra — could be included among the articles of impeachment , giving his malfeasance the airing the Press refused to report at the time , and exposing their malfeasance in the process .
Finally , the third option is kind of a longshot .
Supposing that evidence of a conspiracy is established , proceed with criminal action @ @ @ @ @ @ @ top-tier offenders in conspiracy charges .
( Perhaps RICO , if conditions are met . )
If anybody flips on Obama , that might draw him into the larger set of charges in righting this wrong without setting out to build a case against him per se .
Do you like one of these options ?
Can you think of another one ?
Let us know in the comments below !

Has the smoking gun of this January 5th, 2017 meeting exposed the REAL Obama? And will he be called upon to explain himself under oath?
It’s been the elephant in the room from the moment we knew about this quiet coup attempt against Trump: Where Did Obama fit in this drama?
With the obvious direct involvement of so many Presidential Appointees in the Flynn and Spygate scandals from the beginning, many of us have long assumed that Obama was right in the thick of things. It wasn’t clear whether he was calling the shots, or merely looking on approvingly, but there was no way all of this was happening without his knowledge.
What’s more, the Page/Strzok texts have proven to be a goldmine of damning conversations. Some of them are particularly interesting.
“The White House is running this,” for one.
“POTUS wants to know everything we are doing,” for another.
It brings us right back to that infamous question, “What did the president know, and when did he know it?”
Obviously, Obama isn’t worried about getting ousted from the White House. But that doesn’t change the fact that political malfeasance — if it did occur — requires some sort of a remedy to set it right. Otherwise, we risk political malfeasance becoming acceptable as the new normal.
If a crime was committed, a price must be paid.
Trump has some thoughts on that topic:
If I were a Senator or Congressman, the first person I would call to testify about the biggest political crime and scandal in the history of the USA, by FAR, is former President Obama. He knew EVERYTHING. Do it @LindseyGrahamSC, just do it. No more Mr. Nice Guy. No more talk! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 14, 2020
There’s a new hashtag and everything: #SubpoenaObama
What are the odds of it happening?
Judging by Lindsey Graham’s reaction: the odds are ‘slim and none’. (And slim’s outta town.)
Graham says he will conduct hearings on Flynn, "unmasking," the Carter Page case and whether Mueller should ever have been appointed in the first place. But he says he is worried about the precedent of calling Obama to testify, as Trump has demanded. — Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt) May 14, 2020
Here’s the key quote:
Graham: “Both presidents are welcome to come before the committee and share their concerns about each other. If nothing else it would make for great television. However, I have great doubts about whether it would be wise for the country.” — Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt) May 14, 2020
There’s a good chance that crossing that Rubicon of pressing charges against a former President is a bridge too far for many in D.C. — They fear setting a dangerous precedent. They may fear opening up the possibility of every president from now until the end of time being bullied in the courts after their time in office as a punishment for pushing the ‘wrong’ political agendas.
It seems like this is a dead end. But there might be other ways to settle the matter.
Once the Durham investigation has run its course, we’ll have a much more detailed picture of who did what, to whom, and when. This opens up a couple of other options.
The obvious first option is civil litigation on the part of wronged parties — Flynn, Papadopoulos, Page, Stone, and perhaps even Manafort could have potential standing for such a suit. It wouldn’t be political in nature, it would be an explicit redressing of wrongs suffered.
The second possible option, (if there is legal provision for it) would hinge on Republicans getting a big win in November. Use the Durham investigation findings (if they are as damning as we suspect they are) as the basis for a formal impeachment so that his name and legacy would be forever marred by having his wrongdoing indelibly connected to his office in a way that no amount of historical revisionism could obscure.
Going this route, some of the other abuses that the press refused to cover — for example, weaponizing IRS against his political rivals, Fast and Furious, spying on the Senate, his mistreatment of journalists, and Project Cassandra — could be included among the articles of impeachment, giving his malfeasance the airing the Press refused to report at the time, and exposing their malfeasance in the process.
Finally, the third option is kind of a longshot. Supposing that evidence of a conspiracy is established, proceed with criminal action against Obama’s lieutenants and other top-tier offenders in conspiracy charges. (Perhaps RICO, if conditions are met.) If anybody flips on Obama, that might draw him into the larger set of charges in righting this wrong without setting out to build a case against him per se.
Do you like one of these options? Can you think of another one?
Let us know in the comments below!
Which of these outcomes would you most expect or hope to see? Which of these outcomes would you expect/hope to see with respect to Obama? * Called In For Senate Testimony Civil Litigation Impeachment hearings after the fact Criminal Conspiracy Charges None of these
Enter your email to see the poll results: *


clashdaily--2020-05-14--Did Ambassador Yovanovitch, That ‘Star’ Impeachment Witness, Lie Under Oath?

Lying under oath during an impeachment hearing seems like it might be kind of a big deal , don ’ t you think ?
Especially when that lie hides evidence exculpatory to the guy being accused ?
Think back , WAY back .
All the way to October .
It seems like a lifetime ago , now , doesn ’ t it ?
Back then , we had the insufferable Mister Vindeman who was every bit the proud patriot as , say , James Comey .
We also had the Left ’ s flavor of the month , one Ambassador @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as she walked down that hall on her way to the hearings .
She was their darling , their proxy , perhaps even their champion in the media ’ s ongoing war against Orange Man Bad .
Trending : Open-Carry Restaurant In Colorado Opens Up Defying Cease And Desist Order Depending on whether there is an ( R ) or a ( D ) after your name ( which certainly explains the Media ( D ’ s ) biases ) she was either a whistleblower or a cold-blooded political snake .
Even back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under oath .
Now , new evidence published by one of the last remaining honest Journalists , John Solomon , lends credibility to the Right ’ s first instinct of distrusting of her : During President Trump ’ s impeachment , former U.S .
Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch testified to Congress that she knew little beyond an initial briefing and “ press reports ” about Burisma Holdings , the Ukrainian natural gas firm that had hired Vice President Joe Biden ’ s son Hunter and was dogged by a corruption investigation .
“ It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” she declared under oath on Oct. 11 , 2019 .
But newly unearthed State Department memos obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show Yovanovitch ’ s embassy in Kiev , including the ambassador herself , was engaged in several discussions and meetings about Burisma as the gas firm scrambled during the 2016 election and transition to settle a long-running corruption investigation and polish its image before President Trump took office .
Yovanovitch , for instance , was specifically warned in an email by her top deputy in September 2016 — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Burisma had hired an American firm with deep Democratic connections called Blue Star Strategies to “ rehabilitate the reputation ” of the Ukrainian gas firm and that it had placed “ Hunter Biden on its board , ” the memos show .
She also met directly with a representative for Burisma in her embassy office , less than 45 days before Trump took office , a contact she did not mention during her impeachment deposition .
The discussions about Burisma inside Yovanovitch ’ s embassy were so extensive , in fact , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emails , memos and correspondence in fall 2016 alone , according to the State Department records obtained under FOIA by the conservative group Citizens United .
The contacts included a detailed private letter hand-delivered to Yovanovitch by one of Burisma ’ s lawyers in September 2016 , a briefing later that month from her staff on Burisma ’ s issues , and a meeting scheduled between the ambassador and a Burisma representative shortly before Christmas 2016 as the Obama administration was preparing to leave office .
—JustTheNews It will be interesting to see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her testimony to the facts involved .
We have already seen how the media and the Left demands and even INSISTS that government officials have the book thrown at them for lying .
They are STILL trying to demonize Flynn .
We can only assume they would similarly approve of throwing the book at their beloved Ambassador as well .
Because they couldn ’ t POSSIBLY be motived by crass political opportunism…could they ?
WTF ?
Devin Nunes Says That There Were ‘ Irregular Requests ’ To MONITOR Journalists By Gov ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ukraine Ambassador ’ s Spying On US Citizens And Journos Did The Dems ’ ‘ Star Witness ’ Just Lie To Congress About Biden ?
Clash Poll : Is The Ukraine Ambassador A Witness , Or A Co-conspirator ?
Giuliani : Ambassador Yovanovitch Lied Under Oath And Impeachment Is A Democrat ‘ Cover-Up ’

Lying under oath during an impeachment hearing seems like it might be kind of a big deal, don’t you think? Especially when that lie hides evidence exculpatory to the guy being accused?
Think back, WAY back. All the way to October. It seems like a lifetime ago, now, doesn’t it?
Back then, we had the insufferable Mister Vindeman who was every bit the proud patriot as, say, James Comey. We also had the Left’s flavor of the month, one Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.
The media practically swooned as she walked down that hall on her way to the hearings. She was their darling, their proxy, perhaps even their champion in the media’s ongoing war against Orange Man Bad.
Depending on whether there is an (R) or a (D) after your name (which certainly explains the Media(D’s) biases) she was either a whistleblower or a cold-blooded political snake.
Even back then, we believed she was lying under oath.
Now, new evidence published by one of the last remaining honest Journalists, John Solomon, lends credibility to the Right’s first instinct of distrusting of her:
During President Trump’s impeachment, former U.S. Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch testified to Congress that she knew little beyond an initial briefing and “press reports” about Burisma Holdings, the Ukrainian natural gas firm that had hired Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter and was dogged by a corruption investigation. “It just wasn’t a big deal,” she declared under oath on Oct. 11, 2019. But newly unearthed State Department memos obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show Yovanovitch’s embassy in Kiev, including the ambassador herself, was engaged in several discussions and meetings about Burisma as the gas firm scrambled during the 2016 election and transition to settle a long-running corruption investigation and polish its image before President Trump took office. Yovanovitch, for instance, was specifically warned in an email by her top deputy in September 2016 — three years before her testimony — that Burisma had hired an American firm with deep Democratic connections called Blue Star Strategies to “rehabilitate the reputation” of the Ukrainian gas firm and that it had placed “Hunter Biden on its board,” the memos show. She also met directly with a representative for Burisma in her embassy office, less than 45 days before Trump took office, a contact she did not mention during her impeachment deposition. The discussions about Burisma inside Yovanovitch’s embassy were so extensive, in fact, that they filled more than 160 pages of emails, memos and correspondence in fall 2016 alone, according to the State Department records obtained under FOIA by the conservative group Citizens United. The contacts included a detailed private letter hand-delivered to Yovanovitch by one of Burisma’s lawyers in September 2016, a briefing later that month from her staff on Burisma’s issues, and a meeting scheduled between the ambassador and a Burisma representative shortly before Christmas 2016 as the Obama administration was preparing to leave office. —JustTheNews
It will be interesting to see how she squares that circle in reconciling her testimony to the facts involved.
We have already seen how the media and the Left demands and even INSISTS that government officials have the book thrown at them for lying. They are STILL trying to demonize Flynn.
We can only assume they would similarly approve of throwing the book at their beloved Ambassador as well.
Because they couldn’t POSSIBLY be motived by crass political opportunism…could they?
RELATED (in chronological order)…
WATCH: Rudy Giuliani Drops A BOMB On ‘Ukranian Collusion’ Story And It’s HUGE!
WTF? Devin Nunes Says That There Were ‘Irregular Requests’ To MONITOR Journalists By Gov’t Officials
More Details Emerge About Obama Holdover Ukraine Ambassador’s Spying On US Citizens And Journos
Did The Dems’ ‘Star Witness’ Just Lie To Congress About Biden?
Clash Poll: Is The Ukraine Ambassador A Witness, Or A Co-conspirator?
Giuliani: Ambassador Yovanovitch Lied Under Oath And Impeachment Is A Democrat ‘Cover-Up’


clashdaily--2020-05-14--WATCH: Senate Minority Leader Says That Joe Biden’s Denial Is ‘Sufficient’ To Move On From Tara Read

WATCH: Senate Minority Leader Says That Joe Biden’s Denial Is ‘Sufficient’ To Move On From Tara Reade’s Accusation

Gee , where have we heard the idea that we need to “ move on ” from a sexual assault allegation before ?
Oh , right !
MoveOn.org !
The 7 million-member progressive policy organization that was founded in response to Bill Clinton ’ s impeachment .
It urged the public to “ move on ” from the fact that ol ’ Billy-boy had used Monica Lewinsky as a humidor in the Oval Office , along with committing other sexual acts with the then 20-something White House intern .
Now , the smarmy Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer ( D-NY @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s denial is sufficient and that he ’ ll be a “ great candidate ” and a “ great president.
” Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer ( D-N.Y. ) on Tuesday said that he believes that former Vice President Joe Biden ‘ s explanation of a sexual assault allegation from a former staffer is “ sufficient.
” Trending : Open-Carry Restaurant In Colorado Opens Up Defying Cease And Desist Order “ I ’ ve heard Joe Biden ’ s explanation .
I think it ’ s sufficient .
I think he will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be a great President and I think he ’ ll help us take back the Senate , ” Schumer told reporters during a press conference .
Schumer ’ s remarks appear to be the first time he ’ s weighed in on the allegation from Tara Reade , who has alleged that Biden sexually assaulted her when she worked in his Senate office in 1993 .
But that doesn ’ t exactly jive with his previous stance with the much less credible accusations lobbed at then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to withdraw over the Christine Blasey Ford allegation and submit to an extensive FBI investigation beyond what he had already been subjected to .
Schumer was one of a number of Democrats who called for Kavanaugh to withdraw over allegations made by Christine Blasey Ford about an alleged assault at a high school party , or for him to submit to a lengthy new investigation by the FBI .
There eventually was an FBI investigation , but Democrats complained that it wasn ’ t detailed enough and all but one Democrat would vote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an appearance on “ The View ” in September 2018 , he called Blasey Ford ’ s claims “ extremely credible.
” “ I think the allegations of Professor Ford are extremely credible , ” he said .
“ She took a lie detector test .
She talked [ about ] this to her therapist .
They were having family counseling in part because of what happened to her five years ago and told all the details .
And third , to come out and say something like this puts you and your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brick bats at you and everything else .
“ She didn ’ t do it on a whim .
I don ’ t think she did it for political reasons .
She has a great deal of credibility , ” he said .
As an aside , have you noticed how much Senator Schumer is looking like the crypt keeper these days ?
It must be a result of the blatant corruption of his soul seeping out through his pores .
Back on May 3 , RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel was on ABC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and said that regarding Tara Reade ’ s sexual assault accusation against Joe Biden , the left went “ from Me Too , Me Too , Me Too , to Move On , Move On , Move On in a nanosecond because he ’ s a Democrat.
” It only got better from there .
McDaniel is right–the Democrats ’ and the Media ’ s sudden discovery of Due Process and the presumption of innocence is both rapid and stunning .
But they ’ re one-trick ponies , and we shouldn ’ t @ @ @ @

Gee, where have we heard the idea that we need to “move on” from a sexual assault allegation before?
Oh, right! MoveOn.org! The 7 million-member progressive policy organization that was founded in response to Bill Clinton’s impeachment. It urged the public to “move on” from the fact that ol’ Billy-boy had used Monica Lewinsky as a humidor in the Oval Office, along with committing other sexual acts with the then 20-something White House intern.
Now, the smarmy Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer(D-NY) is saying that Joe Biden’s denial is sufficient and that he’ll be a “great candidate” and a “great president.”
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday said that he believes that former Vice President Joe Biden‘s explanation of a sexual assault allegation from a former staffer is “sufficient.” “I’ve heard Joe Biden’s explanation. I think it’s sufficient. I think he will be a great candidate. I think he will be a great President and I think he’ll help us take back the Senate,” Schumer told reporters during a press conference. Schumer’s remarks appear to be the first time he’s weighed in on the allegation from Tara Reade, who has alleged that Biden sexually assaulted her when she worked in his Senate office in 1993. Source: The Hill
But that doesn’t exactly jive with his previous stance with the much less credible accusations lobbed at then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018. Sen. Schumer had called for Kavanaugh to withdraw over the Christine Blasey Ford allegation and submit to an extensive FBI investigation beyond what he had already been subjected to.
Schumer was one of a number of Democrats who called for Kavanaugh to withdraw over allegations made by Christine Blasey Ford about an alleged assault at a high school party, or for him to submit to a lengthy new investigation by the FBI. There eventually was an FBI investigation, but Democrats complained that it wasn’t detailed enough and all but one Democrat would vote against Kavanaugh’s confirmation. On an appearance on “The View” in September 2018, he called Blasey Ford’s claims “extremely credible.” “I think the allegations of Professor Ford are extremely credible,” he said. “She took a lie detector test. She talked [about] this to her therapist. They were having family counseling in part because of what happened to her five years ago and told all the details. And third, to come out and say something like this puts you and your family through incredible scrutiny. People throw brick bats at you and everything else. “She didn’t do it on a whim. I don’t think she did it for political reasons. She has a great deal of credibility,” he said. Source: Fox News
As an aside, have you noticed how much Senator Schumer is looking like the crypt keeper these days? It must be a result of the blatant corruption of his soul seeping out through his pores.
Back on May 3, RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel was on ABC’s This Week with Martha Raddatz and said that regarding Tara Reade’s sexual assault accusation against Joe Biden, the left went “from Me Too, Me Too, Me Too, to Move On, Move On, Move On in a nanosecond because he’s a Democrat.” It only got better from there.
McDaniel is right–the Democrats’ and the Media’s sudden discovery of Due Process and the presumption of innocence is both rapid and stunning.
But they’re one-trick ponies, and we shouldn’t expect anything less.