clashdaily--2020-10-28--Tucker Blows Lid Off Biden Scandal, Hosts Long-Form Interview With Tony Bobulinski

Remember a year ago when whistleblowers were sacrosanct ?
Where is the media ’ s love of whistleblowers now that there is actual evidence to back up the allegations ?
Not just whistleblowers , but military servicemen .
A year ago , during The impeachment bull $ # ^t , the media closed ranks to protect the dignity and honor of Vindeman and ‘ the whistleblower ’ .
( Who are probably the same person . )
But now that a military serviceman has turned whistleblower and implicates a DEMOCRAT , those rules go out the window .
They were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , just a club they could use to bludgeon Trump .
What evidence does this whistleblower bring to bear ?
We ’ re talking numbers , correspondence , contracts , even the voice recording of another insider trying to talk Tony out of going public with the allegations .
Trending : WATCH : Joe Biden Struggles To Answer A Question , Campaign Staff Orders Reporters To Leave Here is the clip of that recording : Naturally , the media will continue to close ranks around Biden and dismiss his claims as unsubstantiated .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ touch this story with at 10′ pole .
These are the same media that slobbered over every one of Schiff ’ s unfounded allegations against the President .
Isn ’ t it just a beautiful irony that Schiff ’ s own big mouth and Russia fixation could well be the very torpedo that sinks Biden ’ s ship ?
It was Schiff ’ s invoking of that threadbare ‘ Russian Misinformation ’ allegation that made Tony take the nuclear option .
Plausible Deniability came up in the context of Tony ( a political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ business connections .
Here is the first few minutes of the interview with Tucker on one format… Here is the full Tucker interview — ( until YouTube yanks it , that is ) Hopefully , at least one of those video clips will remain live for you to watch them .
What ’ s in this interview ?
Quite a few explosive details , including China , Russia , plausible deniability , emails with dates and names , not to mention some detailed contracts .
Mollie Hemmingway live-tweeted the interview , which is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ someone who wants to know what was covered , but doesn ’ t have the time to watch the whole vide right now .
( We do recommend catching it when you get the chance… and sharing it with someone who only gets the sort of pre-chewed news that doesn ’ t bruise Democrat electoral chances . )
How do we take the country back from the corrupted and incestuous band of money or power-hungry elites ?
By having the courage to stand up — like Tony did — and shine a light @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the corrupted entities are .
The press used to call that ‘ speaking truth to power ’ — before they joined the favor-trading game themselves .

Remember a year ago when whistleblowers were sacrosanct? Where is the media’s love of whistleblowers now that there is actual evidence to back up the allegations?
Not just whistleblowers, but military servicemen. A year ago, during The impeachment bull$#^t, the media closed ranks to protect the dignity and honor of Vindeman and ‘the whistleblower’. (Who are probably the same person.)
But now that a military serviceman has turned whistleblower and implicates a DEMOCRAT, those rules go out the window. They were never really rules in the first place, just a club they could use to bludgeon Trump.
What evidence does this whistleblower bring to bear? We’re talking numbers, correspondence, contracts, even the voice recording of another insider trying to talk Tony out of going public with the allegations.
Here is the clip of that recording:
Naturally, the media will continue to close ranks around Biden and dismiss his claims as unsubstantiated.
Mysteriously, the Media won’t touch this story with at 10′ pole. These are the same media that slobbered over every one of Schiff’s unfounded allegations against the President.
Isn’t it just a beautiful irony that Schiff’s own big mouth and Russia fixation could well be the very torpedo that sinks Biden’s ship?
It was Schiff’s invoking of that threadbare ‘Russian Misinformation’ allegation that made Tony take the nuclear option.
He says when he saw Adam Schiff claiming that emails to him were Russian disinformation, he told Biden camp to get that retracted or he'd go on record. — Mollie (@MZHemingway) October 28, 2020
Plausible Deniability came up in the context of Tony (a political ally) mentioning risk exposure with these business connections.
Here is the first few minutes of the interview with Tucker on one format…
???BREAKING: We now have on the record testimony that @JoeBiden was KNOWINGLY involved in a massive corruption scandal with China.pic.twitter.com/nfsQEDnk3B — Rep. Doug Collins (@RepDougCollins) October 28, 2020
Here is the full Tucker interview — (until YouTube yanks it, that is)
Hopefully, at least one of those video clips will remain live for you to watch them.
What’s in this interview? Quite a few explosive details, including China, Russia, plausible deniability, emails with dates and names, not to mention some detailed contracts.
Mollie Hemmingway live-tweeted the interview, which is as good a summary as any for someone who wants to know what was covered, but doesn’t have the time to watch the whole vide right now. (We do recommend catching it when you get the chance… and sharing it with someone who only gets the sort of pre-chewed news that doesn’t bruise Democrat electoral chances.)
How do we take the country back from the corrupted and incestuous band of money or power-hungry elites?
By having the courage to stand up — like Tony did — and shine a light on wrongdoing, no matter HOW powerful the corrupted entities are.
The press used to call that ‘speaking truth to power’ — before they joined the favor-trading game themselves.


clashdaily--2020-10-28--Democrat Rage Against Confirmation

Democrat Rage Against Confirmation

In a wonderful twist of irony , on October 26 , 2020 , Hillary Clinton ’ s 73rd birthday , Justice Clarence Thomas , whom then Sen. Joe Biden ( D-DE ) maliciously smeared , swore in Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the United States Supreme Court .
President Trump tweeted about her confirmation , “ Last night , we made history and confirmed Amy Coney Barrett to the United States Supreme Court !
Justice Barrett will defend our rights , our liberties , and our God-Given FREEDOM !
” Sen. Tim Scott ( R-SC ) tweeted , “ It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Justice Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court !
We now have nine justices , let ’ s keep it that way !
” Justice Barrett was eminently qualified , and no Democrat senator could deny it .
The attacks on her religious faith fell flat .
The only stance the Democrats could take against Justice Barrett was that her nomination was inappropriate .
This stance , regurgitated by the left-wing media , is simply false .
When the Senate is controlled by the same party as the president ’ s , then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ approved .
When the Senate is led by the opposing party to the president , the facts are less than half are approved .
Trending : WATCH : Joe Biden Struggles To Answer A Question , Campaign Staff Orders Reporters To Leave The truth ?
There was absolutely nothing wrong , inappropriate , or broken about the Senate confirming Justice Barrett .
The truth , though , matters little to the Democrats and their media accomplices .
Sarah Jones whined in the Intelligencer , “ Barrett has little practical legal or judicial experience @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even other conservative justices on the bench .
She is deliberately evasive about her jurisprudential philosophy and her political views , though the public evidence that does exist suggests both are extreme.
” Joe Biden tweeted , “ The rushed and unprecedented confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett as Associate Justice to the Supreme Court , in the middle of an ongoing election , should be a stark reminder to every American that your vote matters.
” Kamala Harris tweeted , “ Today Republicans denied the will of the American people by confirming a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in their effort to gut the Affordable Care Act and strip health care from millions with pre-existing conditions.
” There ’ s a lot that ’ s offensive in the Democrats ’ stance .
First , there is no validity to the assertion that Barrett is “ significantly less qualified ” than anyone else on the Court .
The American Bar Association rated her “ well qualified.
” The attack on her qualifications smacks of religious intolerance and a lack of respect for conservative women .
As for having views in the extreme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than liberal icon RBG who , in my opinion , was about as extreme as they come .
As for candidate Biden ’ s statement , there was nothing unprecedented about a president appointing a Supreme Court justice nominee when there is a vacancy .
The president is elected for four years and has the constitutional responsibility to do so .
As we ’ ve note , the Senate has the responsibility to advise and consent .
This nomination was done in the normal way .
The truth is , Democrats would ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they been afforded the opportunity .
As President Obama once wryly noted , “ elections have consequences.
” Harris ’ tweet is also repugnant .
She claims the Senate “ denied the will of the American people ” by confirming Justice Barrett .
That , too , is patently false .
In 2016 Americans elected Donald Trump to be president .
In 2016 and in 2018 , Americans gave control of the Senate to Republicans .
That ’ s the will of the American people .
It just isn ’ t Harris ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Why does this matter ?
I mean , isn ’ t Justice Barrett on the Court now ?
Yes , she is .
However , the battle continues to rage .
The Democrats are fuming and promising to blow up the foundations of our country .
The New York Post reports , “ Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer ( D-NY ) warned in a speech on the Senate floor Monday that his Republican colleagues would come to regret their decision to move forward on Barrett ’ s nomination.
” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Omar ( D-MN ) have already called for expanding the Supreme Court .
The election is less than a week away .
Though it seems a bit hyperbolic , this election is huge .
The course of our nation will be set for years to come .
Conservatives have fought long and hard to set the direction of the court .
It could all be lost if Biden and his liberal elites pack the court .
Biden has said character is on the ballot .
If it is , then consider his own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bromides against an impeccable judge .
Consider the condescension the left has for regular people .
Consider the disrespect liberals show law enforcement .
Consider our nation ’ s values and vote .
Vote Red .
Vote Trump .

In a wonderful twist of irony, on October 26, 2020, Hillary Clinton’s 73rd birthday, Justice Clarence Thomas, whom then Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) maliciously smeared, swore in Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the United States Supreme Court.
President Trump tweeted about her confirmation, “Last night, we made history and confirmed Amy Coney Barrett to the United States Supreme Court! Justice Barrett will defend our rights, our liberties, and our God-Given FREEDOM!”
Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) tweeted, “It was an honor to vote to confirm Justice Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court! We now have nine justices, let’s keep it that way!”
Justice Barrett was eminently qualified, and no Democrat senator could deny it. The attacks on her religious faith fell flat. The only stance the Democrats could take against Justice Barrett was that her nomination was inappropriate. This stance, regurgitated by the left-wing media, is simply false. When the Senate is controlled by the same party as the president’s, then 87% of Supreme Court nominees are approved. When the Senate is led by the opposing party to the president, the facts are less than half are approved.
The truth? There was absolutely nothing wrong, inappropriate, or broken about the Senate confirming Justice Barrett.
The truth, though, matters little to the Democrats and their media accomplices. Sarah Jones whined in the Intelligencer, “Barrett has little practical legal or judicial experience; she is significantly less qualified than even other conservative justices on the bench. She is deliberately evasive about her jurisprudential philosophy and her political views, though the public evidence that does exist suggests both are extreme.”
Joe Biden tweeted, “The rushed and unprecedented confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett as Associate Justice to the Supreme Court, in the middle of an ongoing election, should be a stark reminder to every American that your vote matters.”
Kamala Harris tweeted, “Today Republicans denied the will of the American people by confirming a Supreme Court justice through an illegitimate process—all in their effort to gut the Affordable Care Act and strip health care from millions with pre-existing conditions.”
There’s a lot that’s offensive in the Democrats’ stance. First, there is no validity to the assertion that Barrett is “significantly less qualified” than anyone else on the Court. The American Bar Association rated her “well qualified.” The attack on her qualifications smacks of religious intolerance and a lack of respect for conservative women. As for having views in the extreme, Ms. Jones should look no further than liberal icon RBG who, in my opinion, was about as extreme as they come.
As for candidate Biden’s statement, there was nothing unprecedented about a president appointing a Supreme Court justice nominee when there is a vacancy. The president is elected for four years and has the constitutional responsibility to do so. As we’ve note, the Senate has the responsibility to advise and consent. This nomination was done in the normal way. The truth is, Democrats would’ve done exactly the same thing had they been afforded the opportunity. As President Obama once wryly noted, “elections have consequences.”
Harris’ tweet is also repugnant. She claims the Senate “denied the will of the American people” by confirming Justice Barrett. That, too, is patently false. In 2016 Americans elected Donald Trump to be president. In 2016 and in 2018, Americans gave control of the Senate to Republicans. That’s the will of the American people. It just isn’t Harris’ will or that of her far-left supporters.
Why does this matter? I mean, isn’t Justice Barrett on the Court now? Yes, she is. However, the battle continues to rage. The Democrats are fuming and promising to blow up the foundations of our country.
The New York Post reports, “Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) warned in a speech on the Senate floor Monday that his Republican colleagues would come to regret their decision to move forward on Barrett’s nomination.”
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (D-NY) and Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) have already called for expanding the Supreme Court.
The election is less than a week away. Though it seems a bit hyperbolic, this election is huge. The course of our nation will be set for years to come. Conservatives have fought long and hard to set the direction of the court. It could all be lost if Biden and his liberal elites pack the court.
Biden has said character is on the ballot. If it is, then consider his own corruption. Consider the Democrats’ bitter bromides against an impeccable judge. Consider the condescension the left has for regular people. Consider the disrespect liberals show law enforcement. Consider our nation’s values and vote. Vote Red. Vote Trump.


clashdaily--2020-10-28--Rush Limbaugh: “Justice Amy Coney Barrett Threw Down A Gauntlet” … Here’s What He Meant

The same news agencies that gave us wall-to-wall coverage of every slight and smear against Justice Kavanaugh have less than a minute to spare for the swearing in of a trailblazing Justice .
In the way the left likes talling up ‘ firsts ’ when it reflects well on their team , Justice Barrett had some firsts of her own .
Although the 5th woman appointed to the court , she is the first with school-age children living at home .
If she had been a Democrat appointee , they would count the two children she adopted from earthquake-ravaged Haiti @ @ @ @ @ @ @ among the ‘ credits ’ column .
We on the right are happy to count her actual relevant credentials .
Her strong mind , sound judgment , and commitment to judicial principles in the spirit of the Constitution as written .
The seemingly impeccable moral character she brings with her only serves to heighten our admiration .
Trending : WATCH : Joe Biden Struggles To Answer A Question , Campaign Staff Orders Reporters To Leave The Democrats , naturally , were ceremonially rending their garments and gnashing thier teeth .
In her acceptance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Limbaugh pointed to as her way of ‘ Throwing down a gauntlet ’ that are worth sharing here .
What follows are excerpts from his Transcript : RUSH : Amy Coney Barrett threw down the gauntlet last night in her acceptance speech at the White House after having been sworn in as the newest Supreme Court associate justice .
What an incredible statement .
What an incredible speech that was .
We will review it as the program unfolds before your very eyes and ears today .
But , I mean , she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people who have a totally jaundiced view of the role and purpose of the courts in our society and in our politics .
It was really , really well done , really great .
And we will be reviewing it in toto .
…BARRETT : It is the job duty of a judge to resist her policy preferences .
It would be a dereliction of duty for her to give into them .
Federal judges don ’ t stand for election .
Thus they have no basis for claiming that their preferences reflect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of duty from political preference is what makes the judiciary distinct among the three branches of government .
RUSH : This separation of duty from political preference is what makes the judiciary distinct among the three branches of government .
The judiciary is not political .
It ’ s the only branch of the three which isn ’ t .
Not supposed to be .
She said federal judges don ’ t stand for election .
Thus they have no basis for claiming that their preferences reflect those of the people .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s the next bite .
BARRETT : My fellow Americans , even though we judges don ’ t face elections , we still work for you .
It is your Constitution that establishes the rule of law and the judicial independence that is so central to it .
The oath that I have solemnly taken tonight means at its core that I will do my job without any fear or favor and that I will do so independently of both the political branches and of my own preferences .
I love the Constitution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and I will devote myself to preserving it .
RUSH : That ’ s Amy Coney Barrett in her acceptance speech .
The whole thing was just fabulous .
It was fantastic , and it is something that every student should be forced to read and to understand because it was the single greatest explanation of the role of a judge in the American political system today that I have ever heard .
Now , the Democrats are fit to be tied .
You have Dick Blumenthal from Connecticut who was threatening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to Amy Coney Barrett , saying , “ There will be consequences .
There will be consequences when you break the rules .
There will be consequences when you lie to us .
There will be consequences.
” I don ’ t know what he was talking about , but he was threatening her .
…SCHUMER : — and what this nomination will mean for their lives , their freedoms , their fundamental rights .
Monday , October 26 , 2020 .
It will go down as one of the darkest days @ @ @ @ @ @ @ States Senate .
RUSH : That means it was one of the biggest wins we could have ever hoped for , folks .
That ’ s all that means .
It means they lost , and they lost big , and they ’ re frustrated they were unable to stop it , and they are beside themselves .
The nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court — her confirmation and her swearing in — is one of the greatest things that ’ s ever happened to the Supreme Court .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ever happened to rule of law .
It ’ s one of the greatest things ever happened to separation of powers .
And I ’ m gon na tell you , her speech last night , I believe — as much as anyone — was targeting the chief justice , who has been so far outside the bounds in his recent rulings , I think… We ’ ll never know , but I think she had him in mind .
In fact , I think Nina Totenberg last night on Fredo Prime Time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ What could a Judge Barrett mean to jurisprudence going forward ?
” …TOTENBERG : You ’ re about to look at a court that is more conservative than any court has been in 80 or 90 years , dating back to the 1930s .
And what that means is that there ’ s going to be a 6-3 majority .
It also means that Chief Justice Roberts — who is , I think it ’ s fair to say , painfully aware of the danger to the courts if the Supreme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ institution .
If it means that he no longer has the kind of control he had in the last term when he was the fifth vote… RUSH : Well , that ’ s exactly what it means , and here ’ s Victor Davis Hanson , sound bite number 11 , with his take on that very assessment .
HANSON : I think it really diminishes the Hamlet “ to be or not to be ” role of Justice Roberts because he ’ s gon na be less relevant than he was in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Barrett .
It really tells the Republicans that they can make great appointments like Clarence Thomas and Justice Barrett , and they don ’ t have to highlight race , class , and gender , that these are incidental .
They ’ re not essential .
Merit is what counts .
RUSH : This is such an important point that I want to try to emphasize this , because what Victor Davis Hanson ’ s pointing out here is , Clarence Thomas a great judge , a great mind .
It doesn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It doesn ’ t matter where he grew up .
It doesn ’ t matter he ’ s African-American .
None of that matters .
It means he ’ s a brilliant jurist .
Justice Barrett , same thing .
You know that slogan , he uses , ‘ Rush is right ?
’ With a breakdown of the event like he just laid out , he ’ s proven it true , yet again .
In both senses of the word .

The same news agencies that gave us wall-to-wall coverage of every slight and smear against Justice Kavanaugh have less than a minute to spare for the swearing in of a trailblazing Justice.
In the way the left likes talling up ‘firsts’ when it reflects well on their team, Justice Barrett had some firsts of her own. Although the 5th woman appointed to the court, she is the first with school-age children living at home.
If she had been a Democrat appointee, they would count the two children she adopted from earthquake-ravaged Haiti and her youngest child with special needs among the ‘credits’ column.
We on the right are happy to count her actual relevant credentials. Her strong mind, sound judgment, and commitment to judicial principles in the spirit of the Constitution as written. The seemingly impeccable moral character she brings with her only serves to heighten our admiration.
The Democrats, naturally, were ceremonially rending their garments and gnashing thier teeth.
In her acceptance speech she made some statements that Rush Limbaugh pointed to as her way of ‘Throwing down a gauntlet’ that are worth sharing here.
What follows are excerpts from his Transcript:
RUSH: Amy Coney Barrett threw down the gauntlet last night in her acceptance speech at the White House after having been sworn in as the newest Supreme Court associate justice. What an incredible statement. What an incredible speech that was. We will review it as the program unfolds before your very eyes and ears today.
But, I mean, she really did throw down the gauntlet to people who have a totally jaundiced view of the role and purpose of the courts in our society and in our politics. It was really, really well done, really great. And we will be reviewing it in toto.
…BARRETT: It is the job duty of a judge to resist her policy preferences. It would be a dereliction of duty for her to give into them. Federal judges don’t stand for election. Thus they have no basis for claiming that their preferences reflect those of the people. This separation of duty from political preference is what makes the judiciary distinct among the three branches of government.
RUSH: This separation of duty from political preference is what makes the judiciary distinct among the three branches of government. The judiciary is not political. It’s the only branch of the three which isn’t. Not supposed to be. She said federal judges don’t stand for election. Thus they have no basis for claiming that their preferences reflect those of the people. And they shouldn’t. Here’s the next bite.
BARRETT: My fellow Americans, even though we judges don’t face elections, we still work for you. It is your Constitution that establishes the rule of law and the judicial independence that is so central to it. The oath that I have solemnly taken tonight means at its core that I will do my job without any fear or favor and that I will do so independently of both the political branches and of my own preferences. I love the Constitution and the democratic republic that it establishes, and I will devote myself to preserving it.
RUSH: That’s Amy Coney Barrett in her acceptance speech. The whole thing was just fabulous. It was fantastic, and it is something that every student should be forced to read and to understand because it was the single greatest explanation of the role of a judge in the American political system today that I have ever heard.
Now, the Democrats are fit to be tied. You have Dick Blumenthal from Connecticut who was threatening, I don’t know what, to Amy Coney Barrett, saying, “There will be consequences. There will be consequences when you break the rules. There will be consequences when you lie to us. There will be consequences.” I don’t know what he was talking about, but he was threatening her.
…SCHUMER: — and what this nomination will mean for their lives, their freedoms, their fundamental rights. Monday, October 26, 2020. It will go down as one of the darkest days in the 231-year history of the United States Senate.
RUSH: That means it was one of the biggest wins we could have ever hoped for, folks. That’s all that means. It means they lost, and they lost big, and they’re frustrated they were unable to stop it, and they are beside themselves. The nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court — her confirmation and her swearing in — is one of the greatest things that’s ever happened to the Supreme Court.
It’s one of the greatest things ever happened to rule of law.
It’s one of the greatest things ever happened to separation of powers.
And I’m gonna tell you, her speech last night, I believe — as much as anyone — was targeting the chief justice, who has been so far outside the bounds in his recent rulings, I think… We’ll never know, but I think she had him in mind. In fact, I think Nina Totenberg last night on Fredo Prime Time has the same fear. Fredo said, “What could a Judge Barrett mean to jurisprudence going forward?”
…TOTENBERG: You’re about to look at a court that is more conservative than any court has been in 80 or 90 years, dating back to the 1930s. And what that means is that there’s going to be a 6-3 majority. It also means that Chief Justice Roberts — who is, I think it’s fair to say, painfully aware of the danger to the courts if the Supreme Court is viewed as just a partisan institution. If it means that he no longer has the kind of control he had in the last term when he was the fifth vote…
RUSH: Well, that’s exactly what it means, and here’s Victor Davis Hanson, sound bite number 11, with his take on that very assessment.
HANSON: I think it really diminishes the Hamlet “to be or not to be” role of Justice Roberts because he’s gonna be less relevant than he was in the past with the addition of Justice Barrett. It really tells the Republicans that they can make great appointments like Clarence Thomas and Justice Barrett, and they don’t have to highlight race, class, and gender, that these are incidental. They’re not essential. Merit is what counts.
RUSH: This is such an important point that I want to try to emphasize this, because what Victor Davis Hanson’s pointing out here is, Clarence Thomas a great judge, a great mind. It doesn’t matter that he’s black. It doesn’t matter where he grew up. It doesn’t matter he’s African-American. None of that matters. It means he’s a brilliant jurist. Justice Barrett, same thing.
You know that slogan, he uses, ‘Rush is right?’
With a breakdown of the event like he just laid out, he’s proven it true, yet again.
In both senses of the word.


clashdaily--2020-10-28--DEGROFF: Winners And Losers

DEGROFF: Winners And Losers

By now , just a few days away from the 2020 Presidential election , there ’ s not much left to say .
A lot of people have taken the vote early option , but many are also waiting for November 3 to do so in person .
No one with even a few functioning brain cells believes the polls , and we all know how we feel about things at this point .
At least , every intelligent voter should .
With that in mind , there is also no reason to rehash all the pros and cons .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ on how the winning side will impact the losing side , with a small bit of commentary .
Plus a few empirical observations for extra credit .
Who are losers if the Dems win ?
What will the rest of us lose ?
• The Supreme Court .
They will “ pack ” it with Liberal/Socialist/Progressive judges to the point where no conservative will ever again have a voice .
It won ’ t happen overnight , but it will happen .
FDR wanted to do it and failed .
They have never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You can kiss this goodbye .
Small town America and lesser populated states will no longer have a say in Presidential elections .
• Bill Of Rights .
The Left is already incrementally chipping away at the First .
We know their plans for the Second .
You better believe they ’ ll go after the entire Bill Of Rights , and then the rest of The Constitution if they get the chance .
• Capitalism as we know it .
By now , we all know that the overreaction to the Wuhan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ masking , social distancing , contact tracing , “ the new normal ” , are all socialist ideas .
The lockdowns ( i.e .
business closures ) are not about health .
It ’ s about destroying the economy to the point where everyone except the elite have to rely on the government just to live .
• Safety .
Sen. Harris said it best in an interview when asked about the riots this past summer .
She openly stated that they should keep going , even after the election .
That one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know about the Left ’ s plan for America .
Conversely now , when Trump wins , what do the anti-American forces among us stand to lose ?
• Masks/lockdowns/kungflu overreaction .
The President has already called for opening the entire country back up .
The blue states and their socialist governors and mayors will resist , but it has to be done .
And if enough people start to take matters into their own hands , it will .
• Never Trumpers .
We know who they all are .
They ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There ’ s no logical way to keep bringing in millions of unskilled workers , mostly illegals who can ’ t even speak the language , and not have American workers start to revolt .
It ’ s past time to finish the wall .
And now we have the incentive and ability to do so .
• Censorship .
George Orwell couldn ’ t have even imagined the Big Tech power we deal with , or how permeated with political correctness and cancel culture all American institutions have become .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we ’ re at now with censorship on all levels overnight , but now we have the awareness and willingness to fight back .
Trump ’ s second term will enable us to do so .
Congress is starting to take notice as well .
• Safety .
Okay , so this was in the list of what America loses if the socialists win .
It will continue to be an issue even after Trump wins .
On one hand , though , this might really become an issue that the left will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have had it with Leftist governors and mayors doing nothing about riots .
If the riots start up again , there ’ s a growing portion of American citizens who are out of patience and won ’ t wait on the police to deal with the situation .
I ’ ve written before that there are only two things that will stop the riots : 1 ) the weather , and 2 ) when the rest of us start shooting .
Trending : WATCH : Joe Biden Struggles To Answer A Question , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are some things I expect that won ’ t change any time soon , no matter who wins .
( i.e .
the aforementioned empirical observations . )
• The Clintons brought to justice ?
Not likely • Coney and the FBI , Adam Schiff , and Nancy Pelosi dealt with or at least formally censured ?
( Again , ditto ) • The mainstream media will continue to be the PR department for the Democrats .
• Academia , or so-called “ higher learning ” , will continue to be nothing but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will continue to say democracy is in danger whenever they don ’ t get to control something or win even a local election .
• President Trump and all Republicans and conservatives will be under daily scrutiny and/or assault .
In closing , it ’ s not hyperbole to say this is the most important election in our history .
The Dems still haven ’ t gotten over 2016 , so expect some last-minute underhandedness , even fraud , on their part .
If you haven ’ t already voted , please do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , pray for the country like you never have before .
May God save The United States of America .
Instead of my usual moment of self-promotion , here are some photos of American patriots in Warsaw , Indiana .
I was honored to be a part of this .
Pray we continue to have this type of freedom to gather this way .

By now, just a few days away from the 2020 Presidential election, there’s not much left to say. A lot of people have taken the vote early option, but many are also waiting for November 3 to do so in person. No one with even a few functioning brain cells believes the polls, and we all know how we feel about things at this point. At least, every intelligent voter should.
With that in mind, there is also no reason to rehash all the pros and cons. What I want to do is focus on how the winning side will impact the losing side, with a small bit of commentary. Plus a few empirical observations for extra credit.
Who are losers if the Dems win? What will the rest of us lose?
The Supreme Court. They will “pack” it with Liberal/Socialist/Progressive judges to the point where no conservative will ever again have a voice. It won’t happen overnight, but it will happen. FDR wanted to do it and failed. They have never forgotten.
They will “pack” it with Liberal/Socialist/Progressive judges to the point where no conservative will ever again have a voice. It won’t happen overnight, but it will happen. FDR wanted to do it and failed. They have never forgotten. The Electoral College. You can kiss this goodbye. Small town America and lesser populated states will no longer have a say in Presidential elections.
You can kiss this goodbye. Small town America and lesser populated states will no longer have a say in Presidential elections. Bill Of Rights. The Left is already incrementally chipping away at the First. We know their plans for the Second. You better believe they’ll go after the entire Bill Of Rights, and then the rest of The Constitution if they get the chance.
The Left is already incrementally chipping away at the First. We know their plans for the Second. You better believe they’ll go after the entire Bill Of Rights, and then the rest of The Constitution if they get the chance. Capitalism as we know it. By now, we all know that the overreaction to the Wuhan Kungflu is prep for socialism. Enforced masking, social distancing, contact tracing, “the new normal”, are all socialist ideas. The lockdowns (i.e. business closures) are not about health. It’s about destroying the economy to the point where everyone except the elite have to rely on the government just to live.
By now, we all know that the overreaction to the Wuhan Kungflu is prep for socialism. Enforced masking, social distancing, contact tracing, “the new normal”, are all socialist ideas. The lockdowns (i.e. business closures) are not about health. It’s about destroying the economy to the point where everyone except the elite have to rely on the government just to live. Safety. Sen. Harris said it best in an interview when asked about the riots this past summer. She openly stated that they should keep going, even after the election. That one statement alone says all we need to know about the Left’s plan for America.
Conversely now, when Trump wins, what do the anti-American forces among us stand to lose?
Masks/lockdowns/kungflu overreaction. The President has already called for opening the entire country back up. The blue states and their socialist governors and mayors will resist, but it has to be done. And if enough people start to take matters into their own hands, it will.
The President has already called for opening the entire country back up. The blue states and their socialist governors and mayors will resist, but it has to be done. And if enough people start to take matters into their own hands, it will. Never Trumpers. We know who they all are. They’re done.
We know who they all are. They’re done. Open borders crowd. There’s no logical way to keep bringing in millions of unskilled workers, mostly illegals who can’t even speak the language, and not have American workers start to revolt. It’s past time to finish the wall. And now we have the incentive and ability to do so.
There’s no logical way to keep bringing in millions of unskilled workers, mostly illegals who can’t even speak the language, and not have American workers start to revolt. It’s past time to finish the wall. And now we have the incentive and ability to do so. Censorship. George Orwell couldn’t have even imagined the Big Tech power we deal with, or how permeated with political correctness and cancel culture all American institutions have become. We didn’t get to the point we’re at now with censorship on all levels overnight, but now we have the awareness and willingness to fight back. Trump’s second term will enable us to do so. Congress is starting to take notice as well.
George Orwell couldn’t have even imagined the Big Tech power we deal with, or how permeated with political correctness and cancel culture all American institutions have become. We didn’t get to the point we’re at now with censorship on all levels overnight, but now we have the awareness and willingness to fight back. Trump’s second term will enable us to do so. Congress is starting to take notice as well. Safety. Okay, so this was in the list of what America loses if the socialists win. It will continue to be an issue even after Trump wins. On one hand, though, this might really become an issue that the left will need to pay attention to. People have had it with Leftist governors and mayors doing nothing about riots. If the riots start up again, there’s a growing portion of American citizens who are out of patience and won’t wait on the police to deal with the situation. I’ve written before that there are only two things that will stop the riots: 1) the weather, and 2) when the rest of us start shooting.
Here are some things I expect that won’t change any time soon, no matter who wins. (i.e. the aforementioned empirical observations.)
The Clintons brought to justice? Not likely
Coney and the FBI, Adam Schiff, and Nancy Pelosi dealt with or at least formally censured? (Again, ditto)
The “new normal” to stop.
The mainstream media will continue to be the PR department for the Democrats.
Academia, or so-called “higher learning”, will continue to be nothing but expensive Communist/Socialist/Progressive training facilities.
Democrats will continue to say democracy is in danger whenever they don’t get to control something or win even a local election.
President Trump and all Republicans and conservatives will be under daily scrutiny and/or assault.
In closing, it’s not hyperbole to say this is the most important election in our history. The Dems still haven’t gotten over 2016, so expect some last-minute underhandedness, even fraud, on their part. If you haven’t already voted, please do so come Nov. 3rd. And everyone, pray for the country like you never have before. May God save The United States of America.
Instead of my usual moment of self-promotion, here are some photos of American patriots in Warsaw, Indiana. I was honored to be a part of this. Pray we continue to have this type of freedom to gather this way.


clashdaily--2020-10-28--Philly Riots Ramping Up: Reporter Hasn’t Seen Anything Like It Since May’s Riots In Minneapolis

Night two of the violent uprisings in Philly was worse than the first one .
Over a thousand rioters were said to have hit a targeted area to loot and destroy .
We ’ ve got plenty of footage from the swath of destruction , but first , let ’ s look into some precipitating factors .
Police are having a hard time of it .
Not only were at least 30 of them injured on the FIRST night , ( who knows how many on the second ) … But if this footage from the first night is any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If only we had some clue as to what was the hell was going wrong over there… Philadelphia City Council ’ s Public Safety Committee approved a proposal Tuesday that if signed into law would be among the first of its kind for a major US city .
The measure would effectively ban the use of non-lethal force against protesters .
That means law enforcement in Philadelphia would no longer be permitted to use resources like tear gas , pepper spray , and rubber bullets when people are exercising their First Amendment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Order Of Police said the only thing this proposal does is put public safety at risk .
FOP Vice President Roosevelt Poplar said the whole point of using non-lethal force for crowd control is to keep the public as safe as possible during a potentially dangerous situation .
“ So , basically , you ’ re taking away non-lethal munitions and you ’ re leaving them with only one tool , and that ’ s a deadly weapon tool , which is a gun , ” Poplar said .
–ABC That would count @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t helping any : How bad was the damage ?
One of the reporters present in the early days of the George Floyd riots ( remember that name ? )
says he hasn ’ t seen anything like it since Minnesota back in May .
Rosas wasn ’ t the only reporter on the scene .
Philly Erupts Into Violence Hours After Police Shoot Armed Man Dead … Truck Runs Over Cop

Night two of the violent uprisings in Philly was worse than the first one. Over a thousand rioters were said to have hit a targeted area to loot and destroy.
We’ve got plenty of footage from the swath of destruction, but first, let’s look into some precipitating factors.
Police are having a hard time of it. Not only were at least 30 of them injured on the FIRST night, (who knows how many on the second)…
But if this footage from the first night is any indication, they have been badly outnumbered.
Police run away and retreat from a mob of BLM rioters in Philadelphia. pic.twitter.com/mcRONzebDl — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) October 27, 2020
If only we had some clue as to what was the hell was going wrong over there…
Philadelphia City Council’s Public Safety Committee approved a proposal Tuesday that if signed into law would be among the first of its kind for a major US city. The measure would effectively ban the use of non-lethal force against protesters. That means law enforcement in Philadelphia would no longer be permitted to use resources like tear gas, pepper spray, and rubber bullets when people are exercising their First Amendment rights. …But officials from the Fraternal Order Of Police said the only thing this proposal does is put public safety at risk. FOP Vice President Roosevelt Poplar said the whole point of using non-lethal force for crowd control is to keep the public as safe as possible during a potentially dangerous situation. “So, basically, you’re taking away non-lethal munitions and you’re leaving them with only one tool, and that’s a deadly weapon tool, which is a gun,” Poplar said. –ABC
That would count as a clue.
This probably isn’t helping any:
The head of Philadelphia’s police department was the head of Portland’s police department until this year. — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) October 28, 2020
But wait, there’s more!
How bad was the damage?
One of the reporters present in the early days of the George Floyd riots (remember that name?) says he hasn’t seen anything like it since Minnesota back in May.
Stores being looted in Philadelphia while police are guarding the Walmart that was looted earlier. pic.twitter.com/R84NUaPk4W — Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) October 28, 2020
Philadelphia looters ransacking a TMobile store. pic.twitter.com/EkybAwhh4X — Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) October 28, 2020
A Chick-fil-A in Philadelphia was broken into and damaged. pic.twitter.com/yfR4w5laOj — Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) October 28, 2020
The inside of a looted Rite Aid in Philadelphia. pic.twitter.com/LNgAVMi5EF — Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) October 28, 2020
Rosas wasn’t the only reporter on the scene.
At the BLM riot in Philadelphia, a looter wheels a large appliance out of the store. pic.twitter.com/gmcsebGLDJ — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) October 28, 2020
Footage from inside a Philadelphia business shows looters destroying the place within seconds during the BLM riot. pic.twitter.com/yz81zf8E6j — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) October 28, 2020
BREAKING: I was jumped by BLM rioters while they were looting more than a dozen stores, including Wal-Matt, T-Mobile, & 5-below Though in pain, I didn’t stop reporting because Americans need to see what the corporate media refuses to show
pic.twitter.com/VI5hl8uV3C — ELIJAH SCHAFFER (@ElijahSchaffer) October 28, 2020
Tonight, I was jumped by BLM rioters while covering the civil unrest in Philadelphia Reporter @ShelbyTalcott captured the moment the looters jumped me inside of a 5-Below They tried to rob me as well but I was able to get away without losing my phone
pic.twitter.com/DrgnbE20wA — ELIJAH SCHAFFER (@ElijahSchaffer) October 28, 2020
Related…
Philly Erupts Into Violence Hours After Police Shoot Armed Man Dead … Truck Runs Over Cop


clashdaily--2020-10-28--Trump Sparks A Rise In ‘Patriot Churches’ — The Left Loses Their Damned Minds

The left doesn ’ t seem to understand the Christian right AT ALL .
Nor do they want to .
The Washington Post published an article warning of the rise of “ Patriot Churches ” — a movement of churches that want to ensure that the United States stays true to its founding as a Chrisitan nation .
Sarah Pulliam Bailey ’ s bio states that she is a “ religion reporter ” for the Washington Post and was the online editor for Christianity Today .
Trending : WATCH : Joe Biden Struggles To Answer A Question , Campaign Staff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think that someone like that would be more friendly to Bible-believing Christian views .
But that doesn ’ t get you invited to the right parties , I guess .
Or perhaps “ beltway ” and/or “ coastal ” Christian churches are somehow different than those in “ flyover country.
” You can almost hear the sneering condescension of the rubes in Red States “ clinging to their guns and their God ” throughout the article .
That sounds kind of awesome , actually !
Not to Sarah Pulliam Bailey , the author @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you just hear the elitism dripping through those first couple of sentences ?
Imagine !
They meet in a barn with a flag painted on the roof — and in Tennessee , no less !
Bailey also makes sure to mention that the church encourages people to go “ maskless ” and doesn ’ t follow social distancing guidelines which are the markers of morality in the “ new normal ” of the COVID era we are currently in .
This is a Patriot Church , part of an evolving network of nondenominational @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take the country back for God .
While most White conservative Christian churches might only touch on politics around election time and otherwise choose to keep the focus during worship on God , politics and religion are inseparable here .
The Tennessee congregation is one of three Patriot Churches that formed in September .
The other two are near Liberty University in Lynchburg , Va. , and in Spokane , Wash. , and Peters says he is talking with several more pastors of existing churches who want to join them .
The 50 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as born-again or just as generic “ Bible-loving ” Christians .
Peters ’ s flock is not affiliated with a specific denomination , but it does have a distinct identity .
The Patriot Churches belong to what religion experts describe as a loosely organized Christian nationalist movement that has flourished under President Trump .
In just four years , he has helped reshape the landscape of American Christianity by elevating Christians once considered fringe , including Messianic Jews , preachers of the prosperity gospel and self-styled prophets .
At times , this made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ common thread among them is a sense of being under siege and a belief that America has been and should remain a Christian nation .
So… that ’ s not pejorative , right ?
It ’ s totally fair reporting and not at all trying to paint the “ religious right ” as a bunch of racist wackadoodles , correct ?
They ’ re not saying overtly that the church in Tennessee is a white supremacist organization — just kind of implying it .
An article in Esquire magazine referencing the WaPo article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Patriot Church movement to a cult-like white supremacist organization posing as a church founded by an overt — and currently imprisoned — Neo-Nazi , Matt Hale .
Thus has it always been with the Media ( D ) and Christians .
Is it any surprise that the Glorious ACB was subjected to their anti-Catholic bias and Joe Biden is not ?
If you don ’ t agree with the left ’ s policy prescriptions — even if it means that you ’ re in defiance of your own church doctrine — then you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Post article then goes on to explain that the term “ Christian Nationalist.
” Sociologist Samuel Perry , co-author of the new book “ Taking America Back for God , ” says no other factor better predicts a vote for Trump than adherence to a Christian nationalist ideology .
Poll data shows it is also a stronger predictor of Americans ’ attitudes about race , gender , Islam , family/sexuality issues and mask-wearing than traditional political ideology .
More than one-third of Americans say this country has always been and is currently a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Americans agree that God has granted the United States a special role in human history , according to the Public Religion Research Institute… …Peters isn ’ t sure he likes the term “ Christian nationalism ” because he worries people will equate it with being a white nationalist or someone who hates Muslims and women — all things he disavows .
But he concedes it fits the definition of someone who wants America to remain a Christian nation .
“ Some Christians are trying to shame those who love this country or love @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ We ’ re saying , we ’ re not only unashamed , but we ’ re going to put it in the name.
” Twice in the article , the author quotes Pastor Peters saying , “ Dude , this is Trump country.
” Which , if I were to guess , is some sort of “ dog whistle ” to remind readers of the Jussie Smollett hate hoax that he still insists is true despite piles of evidence to the contrary .
Bailey then goes on to detail an evening showing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ Trump Card ” — noting that D ’ Souza was unduly harassed by the Obama administration in retaliation for his movie “ Obama ’ s America ” pleaded guilty to a felony charge of making an illegal campaign contribution ” — at the church and how “ problematic ” that was .
The churchgoers nod along and occasionally clap during the film , which includes an animated image of community organizer Saul Alinsky , who is Jewish , pulling a KKK hood over his head .
D ’ Souza and others @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them and any racist or white nationalist causes , claiming Democrats are the real racists .
After the movie , Peters warns that under a President Joe Biden , the “ spirit of Jezebel ” could spread .
“ When you ’ re dealing with bullies , you have to fight back , ” he says .
He ends the evening by praying that women and racial minorities would be freed from their deception that the Democratic Party has their best interests at heart .
“ The left doesn ’ t love the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says .
“ Freedom is the way , not the value system of the left , which is totally anti-Bible .
But the Bible is the answer , and Jesus is the answer.
” Clearly , the problem is that journos simply don ’ t understand what Christians who actually read the Bible believe that it says .
They have no understanding of the Christian faith and want to contort it into what they want it to be — that Jesus was a happy leftist who would agree with them on everything and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Bible-believing Christians ” — like yours truly — actually believe that the United States was founded as a Christian nation .
It is that very Christian view that allows for inclusivity , diversity , and acceptance of all people .
But also , Christian conservatives are being attacked in that very free society that they have fostered , especially in the United States .
See the Sohrab Ahmari/David French debate as proof .
It seems that there is a segment of American Christians who are feeling like they are unheard — until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and actually listened to them .
It was Obama — that allegedly great uniter — that dismissed Christians as “ bitter clingers ” and , well , the fish rots from the head down .
Christianity isn ’ t inherently America , but America is indeed tied to Christian values .
Isn ’ t that why the Puritans came here — to create a place where they could worship without being punished by their government ?
It ’ s something for leftists to think about this Thanksgiving while the government regulates who , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their family gathering .

The left doesn’t seem to understand the Christian right AT ALL.
Nor do they want to.
The Washington Post published an article warning of the rise of “Patriot Churches” — a movement of churches that want to ensure that the United States stays true to its founding as a Chrisitan nation.
Sarah Pulliam Bailey’s bio states that she is a “religion reporter” for the Washington Post and was the online editor for Christianity Today.
You’d think that someone like that would be more friendly to Bible-believing Christian views.
But that doesn’t get you invited to the right parties, I guess.
Or perhaps “beltway” and/or “coastal” Christian churches are somehow different than those in “flyover country.”
You can almost hear the sneering condescension of the rubes in Red States “clinging to their guns and their God” throughout the article.
The new congregation is gathered in a barn in Lenoir City, Tenn., with a roof that has a 60-foot American flag painted on it. And they are praying for a Trump landslide. Standing in a circle, the dozen or so men and women, young and old, lay their hands on their pastor, Ken Peters, as he raises their requests to God.
That sounds kind of awesome, actually!
Not to Sarah Pulliam Bailey, the author of the article.
Can’t you just hear the elitism dripping through those first couple of sentences?
Imagine! They meet in a barn with a flag painted on the roof — and in Tennessee, no less!
How unsophisticated and positively rural!
It probably smells like… *gasp* …the country!
How gauche!
Bailey also makes sure to mention that the church encourages people to go “maskless” and doesn’t follow social distancing guidelines which are the markers of morality in the “new normal” of the COVID era we are currently in.
This is a Patriot Church, part of an evolving network of nondenominational start-up congregations that say they want to take the country back for God. While most White conservative Christian churches might only touch on politics around election time and otherwise choose to keep the focus during worship on God, politics and religion are inseparable here. The Tennessee congregation is one of three Patriot Churches that formed in September. The other two are near Liberty University in Lynchburg, Va., and in Spokane, Wash., and Peters says he is talking with several more pastors of existing churches who want to join them. The 50 or so people in attendance may identify as born-again or just as generic “Bible-loving” Christians. Peters’s flock is not affiliated with a specific denomination, but it does have a distinct identity. The Patriot Churches belong to what religion experts describe as a loosely organized Christian nationalist movement that has flourished under President Trump. In just four years, he has helped reshape the landscape of American Christianity by elevating Christians once considered fringe, including Messianic Jews, preachers of the prosperity gospel and self-styled prophets. At times, this made for some strange bedfellows, but the common thread among them is a sense of being under siege and a belief that America has been and should remain a Christian nation.
So… that’s not pejorative, right? It’s totally fair reporting and not at all trying to paint the “religious right” as a bunch of racist wackadoodles, correct? They’re not saying overtly that the church in Tennessee is a white supremacist organization — just kind of implying it.
An article in Esquire magazine referencing the WaPo article was much more overt by comparing the Patriot Church movement to a cult-like white supremacist organization posing as a church founded by an overt — and currently imprisoned — Neo-Nazi, Matt Hale.
There is no evidence that these churches are remotely the same as Hale’s organization, which was openly racist and demonstrably violent. But Christian nationalism, even run benignly, has little to do with being a Christian and doesn’t seem to have a clue about what this nation is supposed to stand for. Source: esquire
Thus has it always been with the Media (D) and Christians.
Is it any surprise that the Glorious ACB was subjected to their anti-Catholic bias and Joe Biden is not? If you don’t agree with the left’s policy prescriptions — even if it means that you’re in defiance of your own church doctrine — then you’re the bigot.
The Washington Post article then goes on to explain that the term “Christian Nationalist.”
Sociologist Samuel Perry, co-author of the new book “Taking America Back for God,” says no other factor better predicts a vote for Trump than adherence to a Christian nationalist ideology. Poll data shows it is also a stronger predictor of Americans’ attitudes about race, gender, Islam, family/sexuality issues and mask-wearing than traditional political ideology. More than one-third of Americans say this country has always been and is currently a Christian nation, and 40 percent of Americans agree that God has granted the United States a special role in human history, according to the Public Religion Research Institute… …Peters isn’t sure he likes the term “Christian nationalism” because he worries people will equate it with being a white nationalist or someone who hates Muslims and women — all things he disavows. But he concedes it fits the definition of someone who wants America to remain a Christian nation. “Some Christians are trying to shame those who love this country or love President Trump,” he said. “We’re saying, we’re not only unashamed, but we’re going to put it in the name.”
Twice in the article, the author quotes Pastor Peters saying, “Dude, this is Trump country.” Which, if I were to guess, is some sort of “dog whistle” to remind readers of the Jussie Smollett hate hoax that he still insists is true despite piles of evidence to the contrary.
Bailey then goes on to detail an evening showing of the Dinesh D’Souza movie, “Trump Card” — noting that D’Souza was unduly harassed by the Obama administration in retaliation for his movie “Obama’s America” pleaded guilty to a felony charge of making an illegal campaign contribution” — at the church and how “problematic” that was.
The churchgoers nod along and occasionally clap during the film, which includes an animated image of community organizer Saul Alinsky, who is Jewish, pulling a KKK hood over his head. D’Souza and others reject the association that is made between them and any racist or white nationalist causes, claiming Democrats are the real racists. After the movie, Peters warns that under a President Joe Biden, the “spirit of Jezebel” could spread. “When you’re dealing with bullies, you have to fight back,” he says. He ends the evening by praying that women and racial minorities would be freed from their deception that the Democratic Party has their best interests at heart. “The left doesn’t love the country at its roots,” Peters says. “Freedom is the way, not the value system of the left, which is totally anti-Bible. But the Bible is the answer, and Jesus is the answer.” Source: Washington POst via MSN News
Clearly, the problem is that journos simply don’t understand what Christians who actually read the Bible believe that it says. They have no understanding of the Christian faith and want to contort it into what they want it to be — that Jesus was a happy leftist who would agree with them on everything and call evangelicals the new Pharisees.
Many “Bible-believing Christians” — like yours truly — actually believe that the United States was founded as a Christian nation. It is that very Christian view that allows for inclusivity, diversity, and acceptance of all people. But also, Christian conservatives are being attacked in that very free society that they have fostered, especially in the United States. See the Sohrab Ahmari/David French debate as proof.
It seems that there is a segment of American Christians who are feeling like they are unheard — until Donald J. Trump descended that golden escalator and actually listened to them.
It’s no surprise, really.
It was Obama — that allegedly great uniter — that dismissed Christians as “bitter clingers” and, well, the fish rots from the head down.
Christianity isn’t inherently America, but America is indeed tied to Christian values. Isn’t that why the Puritans came here — to create a place where they could worship without being punished by their government?
It’s something for leftists to think about this Thanksgiving while the government regulates who, where, and how they can have their family gathering.


clashdaily--2020-10-28--Audio: Hunter’s Representation Of The ‘F**king Spy Chief Of China’ … Is That News?

If this audio says what it seems to say , ‘ Compromised ’ wouldn ’ t even BEGIN to describe the Biden family .
The National Pulse broke a story with a recording of Hunter Biden ’ s voice complaining about his sorry lot in life .
It was in an audio file labeled ‘ Most Genius Shit Ever ’ .
In it , was complaining about a lot of things , including criminal investigations and — in particular — heat he ’ s feeling from the press about how he had represented the spy chief of China .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tell me that The New York Times is calling but my old partner Eric , who literally has done me harm for I don ’ t know how long , is the one taking the calls because my father will not stop sending the calls to Eric .
I have another New York Times reporter calling about my representation of Patrick Ho – the fucking spy chief of China who started the company that my partner , who is worth $ 323 billion , founded and is now missing .
The richest man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my partner .
He was missing since I last saw him in his $ 58 million apartment inside a $ 4 billion deal to build the fucking largest fucking LNG port in the world .
And I am receiving calls from the Southern District of New York from the U.S. Attorney himself .
My best friend in business Devon has named me as a witness without telling me in a criminal case and my father without telling me.
” — The original audio from which this was taken can be heard atNationalPulse Trending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Answer A Question , Campaign Staff Orders Reporters To Leave Who is this Patrick Ho ?
Disgraced former Hong Kong minister Patrick Ho Chi-ping was released from a New York prison on Monday , after serving a jail term over a multimillion-dollar scheme to bribe top African leaders .
The 70-year-old , who was jailed for 36 months and fined US $ 400,000 last year , was also expected to be deported because his passport had expired .
…Ho was home affairs chief from 2002 to 2007 .
He was arrested at John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in November 2017 .
He became the deputy secretary general of a think tank funded by the Shanghai-based oil conglomerate CEFC China Energy following his stint in the Hong Kong government .
In December 2018 , a federal jury found him guilty on seven of eight counts of bribery and money laundering over oil rights for CEFC in Chad and Uganda .
Ho was found to have offered US $ 2.9 million in bribes to Chadian President Idriss Déby , Senegalese diplomat Cheikh Gadio and Ugandan foreign minister Sam Kutesa .
—Yahoo If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a platform of integrity and being ‘ the soul of the nation ’ , shouldn ’ t we be asking why so many people in his circle have been convicted of corruption ?
Was everything Tony Bobulinsky said about you true ?
• UH-OH JOE !
Records Show Hunter Biden Is STILL Listed As A Board Member Of A CHINESE Company • BOMBSHELL : Hunter ’ s Former Business Partner Claims He Was Recipient Of China Deal Email — Confirms Joe Is The ‘ Big Guy ’ • Content Of Hunter Biden ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Separate Sources Reported By Two Different News Outlets • NY POST REPORT : Hunter ’ s Emails Show That He Tried To Pursue Lucrative Deal With Chinese Energy Company

If this audio says what it seems to say, ‘Compromised’ wouldn’t even BEGIN to describe the Biden family.
The National Pulse broke a story with a recording of Hunter Biden’s voice complaining about his sorry lot in life. It was in an audio file labeled ‘Most Genius Shit Ever’.
In it, was complaining about a lot of things, including criminal investigations and — in particular — heat he’s feeling from the press about how he had represented the spy chief of China.
“I get calls from my father to tell me that The New York Times is calling but my old partner Eric, who literally has done me harm for I don’t know how long, is the one taking the calls because my father will not stop sending the calls to Eric. I have another New York Times reporter calling about my representation of Patrick Ho – the fucking spy chief of China who started the company that my partner, who is worth $323 billion, founded and is now missing. The richest man in the world is missing who was my partner. He was missing since I last saw him in his $58 million apartment inside a $4 billion deal to build the fucking largest fucking LNG port in the world. And I am receiving calls from the Southern District of New York from the U.S. Attorney himself. My best friend in business Devon has named me as a witness without telling me in a criminal case and my father without telling me.” — The original audio from which this was taken can be heard atNationalPulse
Who is this Patrick Ho?
Disgraced former Hong Kong minister Patrick Ho Chi-ping was released from a New York prison on Monday, after serving a jail term over a multimillion-dollar scheme to bribe top African leaders. The 70-year-old, who was jailed for 36 months and fined US$400,000 last year, was also expected to be deported because his passport had expired. …Ho was home affairs chief from 2002 to 2007. He was arrested at John F Kennedy International Airport in New York in November 2017. He became the deputy secretary general of a think tank funded by the Shanghai-based oil conglomerate CEFC China Energy following his stint in the Hong Kong government. In December 2018, a federal jury found him guilty on seven of eight counts of bribery and money laundering over oil rights for CEFC in Chad and Uganda. Ho was found to have offered US$2.9 million in bribes to Chadian President Idriss Déby, Senegalese diplomat Cheikh Gadio and Ugandan foreign minister Sam Kutesa. —Yahoo
If Joe Biden is running a campaign on a platform of integrity and being ‘the soul of the nation’, shouldn’t we be asking why so many people in his circle have been convicted of corruption?
Are you a crook, Joe?
Are you Putin’s Puppy?
Are you Xi’s ventriloquist dummy?
Was everything Tony Bobulinsky said about you true?
Are you compromised?
Related…


clashdaily--2020-10-28--1.5M Views: Jaw-Dropping Pro-Trump Tribute Sung By Walkaway’s Brandon Straka

The song he picked is powerful in any situation .
But to use it to set out the dramatic images @ @ @ @ @ angry doom-and-gloom and our side ’ s patriotic hope ?
Magnificient .
There ’ s @ @ @ @ @ getting so much play .
Of course , the natural talent of the artist has @ @ @ @ @ .
Entertainment was part of Straka ’ s skillset , after all .
But it @ @ @ @ @ that .
Trending : WATCH : Joe Biden Struggles To Answer A Question , Campaign @ @ @ @ @ Not just about what we ’ re up against — although it does tell that @ @ @ @ @ is that ’ s coming together to come up against it .
Red and white @ @ @ @ @ this video .
As are the colors Red White and Blue… which you might expect @ @ @ @ @ expect is just what kind of a strong performance he is able to deliver with @ @ @ @ @ story as big as America itself .

The song he picked is powerful in any situation. But to use it to set out the dramatic images contrasting their side’s angry doom-and-gloom and our side’s patriotic hope? Magnificient.
There’s a reason this video is getting so much play.
Of course, the natural talent of the artist has something to do with it. Entertainment was part of Straka’s skillset, after all.
But it’s much more than that.
This song tells a story.
Not just about what we’re up against — although it does tell that story.
But who it is that’s coming together to come up against it.
Are y’all able to see this video or has it been taken down by Twitter? pic.twitter.com/mMVws6geWZ — Brandon Straka (@BrandonStraka) October 28, 2020
True Colors.
Red and white hats are featured prominently in this video.
As are the colors Red White and Blue… which you might expect.
What you might NOT expect is just what kind of a strong performance he is able to deliver with this song.
Just his voice. A piano.
And a story as big as America itself.


clashdaily--2020-10-28--Blubbering Chick Loses Her Mind When She Hears Justice ACB Is Sworn In

Whatever made this nutty woman think posting this reaction video was a good idea in the first place ?
For some reason , this woman thinks she needs her cellphone while she ’ s taking a bath .
For some other reason , she thinks she needs to have ( and react to ) notifications of events like a Senate vote — while taking a bath .
To top it all off she thinks she needs to turn on her camera , and FILM her reaction to the Senate confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett ( you guessed it !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trending : WATCH : Joe Biden Struggles To Answer A Question , Campaign Staff Orders Reporters To Leave That alone should be reason enough to put the phone down , take a breath , and wait for a more opportune time .
But we ’ re all living in the Truman Show now , and potentially on camera 24/7 .
Even something as personal as bathing is now public fodder .
But we ’ re not up to the crazy part yet .
This supposedly grown woman has been reduced to an abject @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unnamed threat lurking over her .
So much for the left being composed of Strong , Independent women .
They ’ re being reduced to blubbering fits of tears when a political decision doesn ’ t go their way .
Heaven forbid any REAL tragedy befall their lives , if they ’ re this broken now , what would they sound like if life ACTUALLY got hard , like it did for , say Madison Cawthorn ?
You remember Madison Cawthorn , right ?
He ’ s the guy who had his spine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from his wheelchair to prove a point at the RNC .
In an interview , when the topic of how much outside money his opponent was being showered with , he said it was better that they waste it in HIS race rather than some other race that might tip the scales in favor of a Democrat .
On side sees fear on every side and is paralyzed by it .
The other sees opportunity in the midst of hardship .

Whatever made this nutty woman think posting this reaction video was a good idea in the first place?
For some reason, this woman thinks she needs her cellphone while she’s taking a bath.
For some other reason, she thinks she needs to have (and react to) notifications of events like a Senate vote — while taking a bath.
To top it all off she thinks she needs to turn on her camera, and FILM her reaction to the Senate confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett (you guessed it!) — while taking a bath.
That alone should be reason enough to put the phone down, take a breath, and wait for a more opportune time.
Ugh. Please get a drink of water, your dry mouth sounds are gross. Mental weakness disgusts me. Do better you blubbering pussy. pic.twitter.com/Hv8TcriC5t — Tara LaRosa (@TaraLaRosa) October 28, 2020
But we’re all living in the Truman Show now, and potentially on camera 24/7. Even something as personal as bathing is now public fodder.
Uh, okay..?
But we’re not up to the crazy part yet.
This supposedly grown woman has been reduced to an abject puddle of tears and fear over some unnamed threat lurking over her.
So much for the left being composed of Strong, Independent women. They’re being reduced to blubbering fits of tears when a political decision doesn’t go their way.
Heaven forbid any REAL tragedy befall their lives, if they’re this broken now, what would they sound like if life ACTUALLY got hard, like it did for, say Madison Cawthorn?
You remember Madison Cawthorn, right? He’s the guy who had his spine rebuilt after an accident, and stood from his wheelchair to prove a point at the RNC. In an interview, when the topic of how much outside money his opponent was being showered with, he said it was better that they waste it in HIS race rather than some other race that might tip the scales in favor of a Democrat.
On side sees fear on every side and is paralyzed by it.
The other sees opportunity in the midst of hardship.


clashdaily--2020-10-29--Yaniv Is Back: Transgender Activist Files Human Rights Complaint For Being Rejected From Beauty Page

Yaniv Is Back: Transgender Activist Files Human Rights Complaint For Being Rejected From Beauty Pageant

The rotund Canadian transgender activist is back and just as litigious as ever .
This time , Yaniv is suing a women ’ s beauty pageant for not allowing the biological male to compete .
Jessica Yaniv Simpson ( JYS ) , 33 , rose to worldwide infamy for filing “ human rights complaints ” against ( mostly ) minority women who refused to give Yaniv a Brazilian wax on male genitalia .
But JYS ’ s disturbing behavior goes far beyond that .
This “ Lesbian Warrior Princess ” is known for racist remarks and has been accused of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to arrange for a top-optional swim for transgender teens “ ages 12 and up ” explicitly excluding parents from attending .
That was just the icing on the cake of the complaints by young women when Jessica was known as Jonathan Yaniv and working as the social media account for a popular teen YouTube singing group .
JYS also posted several photos while in a public women ’ s bathroom .
Since making a non-surgical transition , JYS has been become known for filing frivolous and vexatious lawsuits for alleged discrimination .
JYS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s office refused to book an appointment for a biological male .
The latest complaint filed is against Toronto ’ s Canada Galaxy Pageants for allegedly violating the Human Rights Code by holding beauty pageants for biological women and recently made an exception to include post-operative transgender women .
JYS is saying that excluding pre-op trans women is “ discriminatory.
” In May 2019 , Yaniv , whose biological sex is male , applied to be a contestant in the pageant ’ s “ 28 Years and Older Division ” but did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to complete gender reassignment surgery , the Justice Centre alleged .
Yaniv was “ tentatively accepted ” to the pageant but the business had a formal policy stating only genetic females , or transgender women who had fully transitioned , were allowed to be contestants , the Justice Centre said .
When Yaniv was “ reminded ” of the policy , she filed a complaint alleging the pageant company engaged in discrimination based on gender identity , gender expression and sex .
I ’ m so sorry to have to do this to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a bathing suit .
This person is suing to be included in a beauty contest .
Good grief !
There have got to be some standards !
This seems to be the source photo that was heavily edited and is now used as JYS ’ s artistic black and white Twitter photo : JYS also filed a complaint against a radio show for “ transphobic ” comments and inviting a guest who , according to Yaniv , “ spewed hateful remarks about gender identity and transgenderism.
” The discussion that JYS disapproved of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children .
Back to the pageant lawsuit for a second… The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms ( JCCF ) , who will be representing Canada Galaxy Pageants in the human rights allegation , says that the pageant ’ s policy “ has since been revised to include ‘ genetic females and fully transitioned . '
” … …The JCCF says that Yaniv is seeking $ 10,000 in damages for “ injury to dignity and feelings , ” and “ requests that the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario rule that an organization can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that person has male genitalia.
” It ’ s clear that there is something wrong with this person who seems adamant to get into women ’ s change rooms and bathrooms .
This is precisely the kind of person that the gender-based protections for women are meant to address .
• Male To Female Transgender Activist Demands Ladies Wax Male Genitals — Cries ‘ Discrimination ’ When They Refuse • BOOM : Judge Gives Wax My B*lls Activist Some BAD News • Look Who ’ s Back : ‘ Wax My Balls ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • ‘ Wax My Balls ’ Activist Arrested And Charged For Assaulting A Reporter

The rotund Canadian transgender activist is back and just as litigious as ever. This time, Yaniv is suing a women’s beauty pageant for not allowing the biological male to compete.
Jessica Yaniv Simpson (JYS), 33, rose to worldwide infamy for filing “human rights complaints” against (mostly) minority women who refused to give Yaniv a Brazilian wax on male genitalia. But JYS’s disturbing behavior goes far beyond that.
JYS’s Twitter bio reads: “Lesbian warrior Princess. Friend, Daughter & Tech Blogger. She/Her/Hers. Human rights advocate. Model. Social Justice Warrior. Marketer.“
This “Lesbian Warrior Princess” is known for racist remarks and has been accused of creepy, child predator-like behavior after trying to arrange for a top-optional swim for transgender teens “ages 12 and up” explicitly excluding parents from attending. That was just the icing on the cake of the complaints by young women when Jessica was known as Jonathan Yaniv and working as the social media account for a popular teen YouTube singing group.
JYS also posted several photos while in a public women’s bathroom.
Since making a non-surgical transition, JYS has been become known for filing frivolous and vexatious lawsuits for alleged discrimination. JYS complained on Twitter that a gynecologist’s office refused to book an appointment for a biological male.
The latest complaint filed is against Toronto’s Canada Galaxy Pageants for allegedly violating the Human Rights Code by holding beauty pageants for biological women and recently made an exception to include post-operative transgender women. JYS is saying that excluding pre-op trans women is “discriminatory.”
In May 2019, Yaniv, whose biological sex is male, applied to be a contestant in the pageant’s “28 Years and Older Division” but did not disclose she was transgender and had yet to complete gender reassignment surgery, the Justice Centre alleged. Yaniv was “tentatively accepted” to the pageant but the business had a formal policy stating only genetic females, or transgender women who had fully transitioned, were allowed to be contestants, the Justice Centre said. When Yaniv was “reminded” of the policy, she filed a complaint alleging the pageant company engaged in discrimination based on gender identity, gender expression and sex. Source: New York Post
I’m so sorry to have to do this to you, but…
This is JYS in a bathing suit.
This person is suing to be included in a beauty contest.
Good grief! There have got to be some standards!
Yaniv included a photo in that tweet…
This seems to be the source photo that was heavily edited and is now used as JYS’s artistic black and white Twitter photo:
JYS also filed a complaint against a radio show for “transphobic” comments and inviting a guest who, according to Yaniv, “spewed hateful remarks about gender identity and transgenderism.” The discussion that JYS disapproved of was one about the transition of young children.
Hi @MarcPatrone @sauga960am Enjoy having to respond to this complaint I am filing against you with the CBSC. #LGBTQ pic.twitter.com/p8xtnAoQhP — Jessica❤ (@trustednerd) October 26, 2020
Back to the pageant lawsuit for a second…
The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), who will be representing Canada Galaxy Pageants in the human rights allegation, says that the pageant’s policy “has since been revised to include ‘genetic females and fully transitioned.'”… …The JCCF says that Yaniv is seeking $10,000 in damages for “injury to dignity and feelings,” and “requests that the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario rule that an organization cannot refuse a service to someone just because that person has male genitalia.” Source: The Post Millennial
It’s clear that there is something wrong with this person who seems adamant to get into women’s change rooms and bathrooms.
This is precisely the kind of person that the gender-based protections for women are meant to address.
Related:


clashdaily--2020-10-29--Ted Cruz Runs Twitter’s Jack Dorsey Through The Wood Chipper At Senate Hearings

Like so many Silicon Valley fatcats who have been taught not to fear the government paper tiger , Jack sat with serene smugness .
But Ted Cruz wasn ’ t backing down .
With the egregious political interference of Big Tech protecting Team Biden from the Hunter Biden laptop story ( which was both confirmed to be authentic , AND was confirmed NOT to be the work of Russian disinformation campaigns ) Big Tech had some questions to answer .
Ted Cruz turned his attention to Jack Dorsey during the allotted time in the scheduled Hearings .
Dorsey is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ little like some long-lost member of the Manson family , which is weird for a billionaire , but I digress .
Here is the video of that interaction .
He called Dorsey ’ s original answer ‘ absurd on its face ’ .
Ted proved the rank hypocrisy of Twitter having different rules for the Biden laptop story than they did for the NYTimes publication of Trump ’ s taxes — which actually violated American law by publishing them .
He reminded those listening that the New York Post , which he had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but the 4th largest paper by distribution , and old enough that it was founded by none other than Alexander Hamilton .
And he shone a light on the stupid hoops that the New York Post would have to jump through to get reinstated .
They have to delete and repost the content .
The error was on Twitter ’ s part , not the New York Post ’ s .
Therefore , the onus should be on Twitter to reverse the mistake and release the original tweet as written .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by any sense of decency or logic .
Which is a stretch .
TECH TYRANNY : Twitter Won ’ t Restore The New York Post ’ s Account Unless Tweets Sharing Hunter Biden Story Are Deleted Ted Cruz Puts Twitter And China Policy Changes In Their Proper Perspective

Like so many Silicon Valley fatcats who have been taught not to fear the government paper tiger, Jack sat with serene smugness. But Ted Cruz wasn’t backing down.
With the egregious political interference of Big Tech protecting Team Biden from the Hunter Biden laptop story (which was both confirmed to be authentic, AND was confirmed NOT to be the work of Russian disinformation campaigns) Big Tech had some questions to answer.
Ted Cruz turned his attention to Jack Dorsey during the allotted time in the scheduled Hearings.
Dorsey is the guy with the long beard looking a little like some long-lost member of the Manson family, which is weird for a billionaire, but I digress.
Here is the video of that interaction.
Watch Senator Ted Cruz grill Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey on alleged censorship https://t.co/HpEe9Mh8og pic.twitter.com/3g6XFbW0Y0 — CNET (@CNET) October 28, 2020
Ted Cruz wasn’t buying the pre-fab excuses.
He called Dorsey’s original answer ‘absurd on its face’.
Ted proved the rank hypocrisy of Twitter having different rules for the Biden laptop story than they did for the NYTimes publication of Trump’s taxes — which actually violated American law by publishing them.
He reminded those listening that the New York Post, which he had been censoring, was no fly-by-night outfit, but the 4th largest paper by distribution, and old enough that it was founded by none other than Alexander Hamilton.
And he shone a light on the stupid hoops that the New York Post would have to jump through to get reinstated. They have to delete and repost the content.
No…
The error was on Twitter’s part, not the New York Post’s.
Therefore, the onus should be on Twitter to reverse the mistake and release the original tweet as written.
But that’s assuming these companies play by any sense of decency or logic. Which is a stretch.
Related…
Meet The Hack Who’s Overseeing Twitter’s ‘Site Integrity’ — This Includes ‘Fact-Checkers’
TECH TYRANNY: Twitter Won’t Restore The New York Post’s Account Unless Tweets Sharing Hunter Biden Story Are Deleted
BIG TECH CENSORSHIP: Twitter Locks New York Post Account Over Hunter Biden Bomshell
Ted Cruz Puts Twitter And China Policy Changes In Their Proper Perspective


clashdaily--2020-10-29--Someone Opened Tucker’s Mail — Can We Add Mail Tampering To The Biden Scandal Coverup Story?

It ’ s been a big week with some big stories for Tucker Carlson .
This time he ’ s finding himself mixed up in the middle of another one .
Twitter and Facebook suppressed the story .
Partisan politicians , media hacks and activists blew it off as Russian intel .
News outlets refused to cover the damning details .
But intrepid outsiders , unconnected to the incestuous political media swamp , covered it .
Tucker Carlson was one of the big names who did what ‘ mainstream ’ news agencies had refused to do… he treated the Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the parties involved stepped up as a whistleblower , Tucker ran with it .
Congress has since confirmed that the information Tony Bobulinski provided are legitimate .
They are neither forgeries , nor Russian intel , as some Democrats — including Joe Biden , Adam Schiff , and the usual crop of media flunkies — have claimed .
Tucker did his interview Tony Bobulinski in a hotel in California , which was a long way from the East Coast that he calls home .
So when his producer had more incriminating documents to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by overnight courier .
The documents never arrived .
The envelope was discovered to have been opened and emptied somewhere along the way .
But despite a search for the contents , the papers never turned up .
It was a brand-name courier company that most of us have probably used , but he didn ’ t ‘ out ’ which company it was .
Documents directly relevant to the Presidential campaign less than a week away mysteriously turned up missing .
Not only are they gone , but the courier company hadn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of how or where they could have gone missing .

It’s been a big week with some big stories for Tucker Carlson. This time he’s finding himself mixed up in the middle of another one.
Twitter and Facebook suppressed the story. Partisan politicians, media hacks and activists blew it off as Russian intel. News outlets refused to cover the damning details.
But intrepid outsiders, unconnected to the incestuous political media swamp, covered it.
Tucker Carlson was one of the big names who did what ‘mainstream’ news agencies had refused to do… he treated the Biden laptop scandal seriously.
When one of the parties involved stepped up as a whistleblower, Tucker ran with it.
Congress has since confirmed that the information Tony Bobulinski provided are legitimate. They are neither forgeries, nor Russian intel, as some Democrats — including Joe Biden, Adam Schiff, and the usual crop of media flunkies — have claimed.
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has been successful in verifying all materials reviewed so far from Hunter Biden’s ex-business partner Tony Bobulinski… —DailyCaller
Tucker did his interview Tony Bobulinski in a hotel in California, which was a long way from the East Coast that he calls home. So when his producer had more incriminating documents to share with Tucker, they were sent by overnight courier.
The documents never arrived. The envelope was discovered to have been opened and emptied somewhere along the way. But despite a search for the contents, the papers never turned up.
It was a brand-name courier company that most of us have probably used, but he didn’t ‘out’ which company it was.
Documents directly relevant to the Presidential campaign less than a week away mysteriously turned up missing.
Not only are they gone, but the courier company hadn’t even got a working theory of how or where they could have gone missing.


clashdaily--2020-10-29--PROJECT VERITAS: Latest Hidden Videos Exposed Voter Fraud In Corrupt Politicians Of Both Parties!

Dems squawking when conservatives talk about voter fraud think we ’ re singling them out .
Here ’ s why they ’ re wrong .
Democrats care very much about scoring political wins .
Anyone who has watched Pelosi and Schumer over the last 4 years has seen that they put that ‘ principle ’ above all others .
By any means necessary .
We have seen ( and reported on ) people caught on video saying that the ends justify the means .
That all manner of political lying and cheating and malfeasance is justifiable if the end result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This story will expose more of the same .
Most Conservatives recoil at the idea of political ‘ by any means necessary ’ by any means necessary approaches .
We would rather lose than cheat because the cheating itself corrupts and destroys the system we are trying to preserve .
MOST , unfortunately , does not mean ALL .
When someone gets busted for gaming the system , most of us want that offender run out of town on a rail , no matter which party he belongs to .
The Left , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that voter fraud isn ’ t happening… despite a crapton of stories to the contrary , many of which have been covered here on ClashDaily .
( Drop ‘ voter fraud ’ in our search bar for a sampling . )
We ’ ve seen shady stuff and even simple human error ( ? )
, all over the country .
Ballots turn up months after the fact .
Printer ’ s error leaving out a candidate .
Wrong addresses on ballots .
Someone firebombed a ballot return box .
Ballots showing up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ example of social media user showing photos of live ballots showing up in places where the addressee does not live .
All of that is bad news , calling the integrity of the vote into question .
But when the politicians themselves are in on it ?
( And even some Judges mentioned by name , judges who owe these election-fixers favors ? )
That ’ s a whole other kind of corruption .
And thanks to Project Veritas , we have video evidence to back it up .
Funny how the one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she has in her pocket have in common is their support of Joe Biden .
Could it have anything to do with the fact that Trump wants to drain the swamp , and Joe likes to swim in it ?
When Breitbart used to say ‘ first the Dems , then the RINOs ’ , this is exactly what he meant .
It ’ s the kind of character and integrity America so desperately needs right now .
Here ’ s an even better one .
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
While you ’ re at it , here ’ s his latest book : Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to paint Jesus as a non-offensive bearded woman who endorses their agenda .
This book blows that nonsense all to hell .
From the stonking laptop of bestselling author , Doug Giles , comes a new book that focuses on Jesus ’ overt masculine traits like no other books have heretofore .
It ’ s informative , bold , hilarious , and scary .
Giles has concluded , after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , If Masculinity Is ‘ Toxic ’ , Call Jesus Radioactive .

Dems squawking when conservatives talk about voter fraud think we’re singling them out. Here’s why they’re wrong.
Democrats care very much about scoring political wins. Anyone who has watched Pelosi and Schumer over the last 4 years has seen that they put that ‘principle’ above all others. By any means necessary.
We have seen (and reported on) people caught on video saying that the ends justify the means. That all manner of political lying and cheating and malfeasance is justifiable if the end result is getting Trump out of office.
This story will expose more of the same.
Most Conservatives recoil at the idea of political ‘by any means necessary’ by any means necessary approaches. We would rather lose than cheat because the cheating itself corrupts and destroys the system we are trying to preserve.
MOST, unfortunately, does not mean ALL.
When someone gets busted for gaming the system, most of us want that offender run out of town on a rail, no matter which party he belongs to.
The Left, meanwhile, tells us to our face that voter fraud isn’t happening… despite a crapton of stories to the contrary, many of which have been covered here on ClashDaily. (Drop ‘voter fraud’ in our search bar for a sampling.)
We’ve seen shady stuff and even simple human error(?), all over the country.
Ballots turn up months after the fact. Printer’s error leaving out a candidate. Wrong addresses on ballots. Someone firebombed a ballot return box. Ballots showing up in garbages and creeks. Example after example of social media user showing photos of live ballots showing up in places where the addressee does not live.
Someone’s dead mother even voted twice.
All of that is bad news, calling the integrity of the vote into question. But when the politicians themselves are in on it? (And even some Judges mentioned by name, judges who owe these election-fixers favors?) That’s a whole other kind of corruption.
And thanks to Project Veritas, we have video evidence to back it up.
What does Garza mean he’s supposed to “train” the media? ? pic.twitter.com/wa2Uqpo2Rk — Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) October 29, 2020
Funny how the one thing that both the Democrats and Republicans she has in her pocket have in common is their support of Joe Biden.
Could it have anything to do with the fact that Trump wants to drain the swamp, and Joe likes to swim in it?
When Breitbart used to say ‘first the Dems, then the RINOs’, this is exactly what he meant.
The Project Veritas slogan is ‘Be Brave’.
It’s the kind of character and integrity America so desperately needs right now.
That’s a great example to follow.
Here’s an even better one.
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg. While you’re at it, here’s his latest book:
Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to paint Jesus as a non-offensive bearded woman who endorses their agenda. This book blows that nonsense all to hell. From the stonking laptop of bestselling author, Doug Giles, comes a new book that focuses on Jesus’ overt masculine traits like no other books have heretofore. It’s informative, bold, hilarious, and scary. Giles has concluded, after many years of scouring the scripture that, If Masculinity Is ‘Toxic’, Call Jesus Radioactive.