clashdaily--2020-04-14--One Epidemiologist’s Plan To End The Lockdown: ‘Infect The Young And Isolate Those At Risk’

The professor that had predicted the coronavirus crisis in Europe is now calling for an end to the lockdowns and he ’ s got a 3-point plan to do it .
Professor Alexander Kekulé is the head of microbiology at Halle University in Germany .
He saw the warning signs of a possible pandemic and had publicly urged Chancellor Angela Merkel to screen international travelers at ports of entry for the virus as early as January 22 .
His appeals on television fell on deaf ears , however .
Prof Kekulé is now concerned that the lockdown is in danger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cause significant damage to the economy that would be worse than the virus itself .
He says that it is unreasonable to lock down hoping for the development of a vaccine because that could be at least six months away .
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place If Professor Kekulé had been heeded in his early warnings , the COVID-19 situation in Germany might have been very different .
He said that if testing had been done earlier @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ If you can get to people by the time they ’ ve infected 20 people you can stop it .
But by the time it ’ s 400 , there ’ s no chance , ” he said .
Of course , hindsight is always 20/20 .
When it was clear that the virus had spread throughout Germany , Professor Kekulé called for the border to be closed and schools to be shut down .
Now , Professor Kekulé thinks that there is a simple way to end the lockdown while keeping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3 points .
He says that it ’ s important to encourage the elderly , those with pre-existing conditions , and those who are vulnerable to the virus to stay at home while finding ways to make it bearable “ such as apps that will allow them to order their shopping or continue their social life , ” he says .
Professor Kekulé says that if they are determined to go outside , that they must wear full medical standard masks , not just a basic surgical mask .
He says that we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for a while , especially when in an enclosed space with lots of people .
He adds that proper protection like masks and gloves should be worn by those in jobs that are in contact with a lot of people , like a checkout clerk at a supermarket .
3 .
Allow Young People to Contract the Virus This is Professor Kekulé ’ s most controversial point–allow those below the age of 50 to contract the virus to develop immunity to it .
He says that people under 50 “ are very , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ill from the coronavirus.
” This is the “ herd immunity ” plan that has been discredited lately , but Prof. Kekulé stands by it arguing that once the outbreak is under control and the hospitals are not overwhelmed , there is a place for it .
Professor Kekulé says that children are at the lowest risk so the lockdown from schools should be lifted immediately starting with Kindergarten .
Denmark has already planned on opening schools after Easter .
He did admit that there have been instances of younger people who have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus .
He says that occurs when the immune system overreacts to the virus and starts attacking the whole body .
So , is this professor right or ridiculous ?
He was spot on in January when everyone dismissed the “ pneumonia-like illness ” that showed up in Wuhan as an illness that should have been taken seriously .
Perhaps it ’ s time to take him seriously now .

The professor that had predicted the coronavirus crisis in Europe is now calling for an end to the lockdowns and he’s got a 3-point plan to do it.
Professor Alexander Kekulé is the head of microbiology at Halle University in Germany. He saw the warning signs of a possible pandemic and had publicly urged Chancellor Angela Merkel to screen international travelers at ports of entry for the virus as early as January 22. His appeals on television fell on deaf ears, however.
Prof Kekulé is now concerned that the lockdown is in danger of going on too long and will cause significant damage to the economy that would be worse than the virus itself. He says that it is unreasonable to lock down hoping for the development of a vaccine because that could be at least six months away.
“It’s impossible to wait for a vaccine,” Prof Kekulé told The Telegraph. “The quickest we could have a vaccine ready is in six months. Based on experience, I’d say the reality is closer to a year. We can’t stay under lockdown for six months to a year. If we did that our society and our culture would be ruined.”
If Professor Kekulé had been heeded in his early warnings, the COVID-19 situation in Germany might have been very different.
He said that if testing had been done earlier the epidemic could have been contained. “If you can get to people by the time they’ve infected 20 people you can stop it. But by the time it’s 400, there’s no chance,” he said.
Of course, hindsight is always 20/20.
When it was clear that the virus had spread throughout Germany, Professor Kekulé called for the border to be closed and schools to be shut down.
“At that stage a lockdown was the only option to slow the spread and prevent hospitals being overwhelmed,” he says. “But now we have to consider the possibility that a long lockdown may end up doing more harm than the virus.”
Now, Professor Kekulé thinks that there is a simple way to end the lockdown while keeping people safe. His plan has just 3 points.
1. Isolate the Vulnerable
He says that it’s important to encourage the elderly, those with pre-existing conditions, and those who are vulnerable to the virus to stay at home while finding ways to make it bearable “such as apps that will allow them to order their shopping or continue their social life,” he says.
Professor Kekulé says that if they are determined to go outside, that they must wear full medical standard masks, not just a basic surgical mask.
2. Move From “Social Distancing” to “Smart Distancing”
He says that we should all get used to wearing masks for a while, especially when in an enclosed space with lots of people. He adds that proper protection like masks and gloves should be worn by those in jobs that are in contact with a lot of people, like a checkout clerk at a supermarket.
3. Allow Young People to Contract the Virus
This is Professor Kekulé’s most controversial point–allow those below the age of 50 to contract the virus to develop immunity to it. He says that people under 50 “are very, very unlikely to die or get seriously ill from the coronavirus.”
This is the “herd immunity” plan that has been discredited lately, but Prof. Kekulé stands by it arguing that once the outbreak is under control and the hospitals are not overwhelmed, there is a place for it.
Professor Kekulé says that children are at the lowest risk so the lockdown from schools should be lifted immediately starting with Kindergarten. Denmark has already planned on opening schools after Easter.
He did admit that there have been instances of younger people who have gotten seriously ill or died from the virus. He says that occurs when the immune system overreacts to the virus and starts attacking the whole body.
“But this only happens with a very small number of people. I know it sounds heartless but we may have to live with these deaths. Herd immunity is our only option now. We cannot wait for a vaccine. We have to find a way to live with this virus.” Source: Telegraph UK
So, is this professor right or ridiculous?
He was spot on in January when everyone dismissed the “pneumonia-like illness” that showed up in Wuhan as an illness that should have been taken seriously.
Perhaps it’s time to take him seriously now.


clashdaily--2020-04-14--WHO Official Immediately Suspected COVID-19 Spread Human-To-Human–But WHO Spread Chinese Propaganda

WHO Official Immediately Suspected COVID-19 Spread Human-To-Human–But WHO Spread Chinese Propaganda For WEEKS After

This MERS specialist had a suspicion “ right from the start ” that the new “ pneumonia-like illness ” spreading in China had human-to-human transmission .
She was right .
Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove , a MERS specialist , said that she had a feeling that the virus was spreading through human-to-human contact .
“ Right from the start , from the first notification we received on the 31st of December , given that this was a cluster of pneumonia — I ’ m a MERS specialist , so my background is in coronaviruses and influenza — so immediately thought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pathogen , that of course there may be human-to-human transmission , ” she said .
Despite that , the World Health Organization ( WHO ) was busy spreading Chinese propaganda regarding the novel coronavirus .
The WHO repeatedly stated in early and mid-January that Wuhan healthcare workers weren ’ t becoming infected with coronavirus — a key indicator of human-to-human transmission .
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place Yet Wuhan doctor Lu Xiaohong told China Youth Daily that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doctors becoming infected with the virus .
The Wall Street Journal similarly reported that Chinese doctors were aware of human-to-human transmission of COVID-19 since late December , though Chinese authorities censored those who spoke out .
Additionally , a study by The Lancet found that by Jan. 2 , only 27 of 41 laboratory-confirmed coronavirus patients had connections to the Huanan seafood market thought to have been the source of the outbreak .
But a Jan. 12 WHO press release said : “ Based on the preliminary information from the Chinese investigation team @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and no health care worker infections have been reported.
” “ At this stage , there is no infection among healthcare workers , and no clear evidence of human to human transmission , ” it continued .
That press release was issued one day after a doctor in Wuhan , Li Wenliang , who was punished for warning the world about COVID-19 came down with the illness .
In another press release on January 13 , the WHO noted a case of the novel coronavirus that showed up in Thailand .
It read @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infected is not yet known .
To date , there has been no suggestion of human to human transmission of this new coronavirus .
There have been no infections reported among health care workers , which can be an early indicator of person to person spread.
” Again on January 14 , they were saying the same thing .
Eventually , on January 22 , the WHO acknowledged that the illness was spread through human-to-human transmission .
This was after the first case of the novel coronavirus was detected in the United States @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chinese lies rather than telling the truth .
Their delays in reporting human-to-human transmission allowed the illness to spread all over the world .
China is clearly responsible for this global pandemic , but the WHO propped them up by not reporting that Dr. Van Kerkhove ’ s suspicion “ right from the start ” was a possibility .
Our media fell right in line and repeated what the WHO was repeating at the time .
Our Media ( D ) has been moonlighting as the propaganda arm of the Chinese Communist Party @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Organization .
No wonder the President threatened to strip funding from the WHO .

This MERS specialist had a suspicion “right from the start” that the new “pneumonia-like illness” spreading in China had human-to-human transmission. She was right.
Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, a MERS specialist, said that she had a feeling that the virus was spreading through human-to-human contact. “Right from the start, from the first notification we received on the 31st of December, given that this was a cluster of pneumonia — I’m a MERS specialist, so my background is in coronaviruses and influenza — so immediately thought, given that this is a respiratory pathogen, that of course there may be human-to-human transmission,” she said.
Despite that, the World Health Organization(WHO) was busy spreading Chinese propaganda regarding the novel coronavirus.
The WHO repeatedly stated in early and mid-January that Wuhan healthcare workers weren’t becoming infected with coronavirus — a key indicator of human-to-human transmission. Yet Wuhan doctor Lu Xiaohong told China Youth Daily that by Christmas she had already heard of doctors becoming infected with the virus. The Wall Street Journal similarly reported that Chinese doctors were aware of human-to-human transmission of COVID-19 since late December, though Chinese authorities censored those who spoke out. Additionally, a study by The Lancet found that by Jan. 2, only 27 of 41 laboratory-confirmed coronavirus patients had connections to the Huanan seafood market thought to have been the source of the outbreak. But a Jan. 12 WHO press release said: “Based on the preliminary information from the Chinese investigation team, no evidence of significant human-to-human transmission and no health care worker infections have been reported.” “At this stage, there is no infection among healthcare workers, and no clear evidence of human to human transmission,” it continued. Source: Daily Caller
That press release was issued one day after a doctor in Wuhan, Li Wenliang, who was punished for warning the world about COVID-19 came down with the illness.
In another press release on January 13, the WHO noted a case of the novel coronavirus that showed up in Thailand. It read, “The way these patients became infected is not yet known. To date, there has been no suggestion of human to human transmission of this new coronavirus. There have been no infections reported among health care workers, which can be an early indicator of person to person spread.”
Again on January 14, they were saying the same thing.
Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China??. pic.twitter.com/Fnl5P877VG — World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) January 14, 2020
Eventually, on January 22, the WHO acknowledged that the illness was spread through human-to-human transmission. This was after the first case of the novel coronavirus was detected in the United States.
Watch:
The WHO was so busy parroting Chinese lies rather than telling the truth. Their delays in reporting human-to-human transmission allowed the illness to spread all over the world.
China is clearly responsible for this global pandemic, but the WHO propped them up by not reporting that Dr. Van Kerkhove’s suspicion “right from the start” was a possibility.
Our media fell right in line and repeated what the WHO was repeating at the time.
There’s no evidence that the virus, a coronavirus, is readily spread by humans, and it has not been tied to any deaths. But health officials in China and internationally are watching it carefully. https://t.co/7PPJvjyCox — The New York Times (@nytimes) January 9, 2020
Our Media(D) has been moonlighting as the propaganda arm of the Chinese Communist Party, and so has the World Health Organization.
No wonder the President threatened to strip funding from the WHO.


clashdaily--2020-04-14--EPIC SELF-OWN: CNN Flips Out When Trump Torches Media… With Their Own Words

Does CNN even have a CLUE how foolish their reaction makes them look ?
It ’ s no secret that CNN has a visceral hatred for all things Trump .
We already knew it from all those bogus stories they ran and then quietly backed away from… and some they were caught outright faking for no reason other than to slag the President .
Here ’ s a trip down memory lane to see some older examples of a trend that continues today : Yo , CNN : Here ’ s Why All Rational People Are MOCKING You Today Trending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place These pressers are proving to be a dangerous game for the drive-by Media to be playing .
Because they don ’ t get to apply their usual hit-and-run political spin tactics .
He is taking all the time he needs to unpack their questions , reply to them and — when necessary — rip them a new one for questions that have no purpose other than to regurgitate Democrat talking points and discredit the President .
This scrappy guy from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a fight .
And when the Left was trying to build a ‘ blood on your hands ’ narrative out of whole cloth , Trump had their number .
He threw their own words back in their faces .
In the middle of his press conference , he ran this clip : The media was NOT amused .
CNN , in particular , got their panties in a wad .
You can tell by the four different angry chyrons they put up : ‘ Trump uses task force briefing to try to rewrite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ melts down in angry response to reports he ignored virus warnings ’ ‘ Angry Trump uses propaganda video produced by government employees at taxpayers ’ expense ’ .
Fun game .
Now do the Mueller Report and impeachment .
But we digress .
Returning to the spanking Trump gave the media… SOMEBODY is clearly mad .
We ’ re not sure it ’ s Trump that ’ s frothing at the mouth , though .
It didn ’ t take long for this to backfire : Yes .
CNN IS propaganda .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Project Veritas scoop on the Zucker 9 am meetings should have put them to rest .
As recently as Mid-March , Dana Bash briefly spoke well of Trump , until someone above her apparently gave her leash a sharp tug .
( For anyone lurking in the comment section : that ’ s a metaphor .
Relax . )
Nope , nothing to see here : Branco has the right idea : These clowns keep lying in wait for the President .
It ’ s like a kid with a stick picking a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over before it even started .

Does CNN even have a CLUE how foolish their reaction makes them look?
It’s no secret that CNN has a visceral hatred for all things Trump. We already knew it from all those bogus stories they ran and then quietly backed away from… and some they were caught outright faking for no reason other than to slag the President.
(One of our favorite examples of just how petty they could be was the story they ran about the ‘overfeeding’ Koi fish. In order to run that story they had to insert a ridiculous and obvious edit to explicitly leave out the broader context of Trump doing exactly what his Japanese host had done moments earlier.)
Here’s a trip down memory lane to see some older examples of a trend that continues today: Yo, CNN: Here’s Why All Rational People Are MOCKING You Today
These pressers are proving to be a dangerous game for the drive-by Media to be playing. Because they don’t get to apply their usual hit-and-run political spin tactics. He is taking all the time he needs to unpack their questions, reply to them and — when necessary — rip them a new one for questions that have no purpose other than to regurgitate Democrat talking points and discredit the President.
This scrappy guy from Queens doesn’t back down from a fight. And when the Left was trying to build a ‘blood on your hands’ narrative out of whole cloth, Trump had their number. He threw their own words back in their faces.
In the middle of his press conference, he ran this clip:
The media was NOT amused. CNN, in particular, got their panties in a wad. You can tell by the four different angry chyrons they put up:
‘Angry Trump turns Briefing into propaganda session’
‘Trump uses task force briefing to try to rewrite history on coronavirus response’
‘Trump melts down in angry response to reports he ignored virus warnings’
‘Angry Trump uses propaganda video produced by government employees at taxpayers’ expense’.
Taxpayers’ expense, huh?
Fun game. Now do the Mueller Report and impeachment.
But we digress. Returning to the spanking Trump gave the media…
SOMEBODY is clearly mad. We’re not sure it’s Trump that’s frothing at the mouth, though.
It didn’t take long for this to backfire:
All Trump did was play a montage of the Media talking about Coronavirus. CNN is saying that he is playing Propaganda. Did @CNN just admit that they are Propaganda? pic.twitter.com/BmC7UGZPUh — ALX ?? (@alx) April 13, 2020
Yes. CNN IS propaganda. If there were ever any doubts, the Project Veritas scoop on the Zucker 9 am meetings should have put them to rest.
As recently as Mid-March, Dana Bash briefly spoke well of Trump, until someone above her apparently gave her leash a sharp tug. (For anyone lurking in the comment section: that’s a metaphor. Relax.)
Nope, nothing to see here:
CNN cuts away from the coronavirus task force press conference to speak with this panel of epidemiologists. pic.twitter.com/E5l2TfHNq9 — Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) April 13, 2020
Branco has the right idea:
These clowns keep lying in wait for the President.
It’s like a kid with a stick picking a fight with a rottweiler… it’s over before it even started.


clashdaily--2020-04-14--Here’s The First Photo Of Joe Biden Wearing A Mask–Can You Spot The Problem?

Joe Biden is one of those curious politicians who must make satirists pull their hair out .
Because however badly critics drag him , his REAL-life actions always seem to one-up them .
As a case in point , The Babylon Bee recently ran a photo ( relax , NYTimes , we all know this is ‘ photoshopped ’ ) of Biden wearing a custom mask… while mocking his creepy habit of sniffing people .
How do you know it ’ s good satire ?
For one thing , you might know because it ’ s got over 5 MILLION @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place And then Biden comes along and does something like this… Taken from this tweet : Uh… we don ’ t know how to tell you this Joe , but that ’ s now how a mask actually works .
Wear it or don ’ t , but half-measures like these are an apt metaphor for everything that disqualifies you from being the 46th President .
We already know he ’ s copped to being a ‘ gaffe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is he actively TRYING to one-up the satirists ?
Is this a cry for help , looking for a way out of being the Democrat Nominee ?
Has he lost even more of his marbles than we had even suspected ?
If so , at least there ’ s an upside to that : Is he THIS oblivious to both ( a ) how the world works and ( b ) the OPTICS of how he behaves in public ?
Is the answer simpler than that ?
Is Biden , in the words @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sharp as a bag of wet mice ’ ?

Joe Biden is one of those curious politicians who must make satirists pull their hair out. Because however badly critics drag him, his REAL-life actions always seem to one-up them.
As a case in point, The Babylon Bee recently ran a photo (relax, NYTimes, we all know this is ‘photoshopped’) of Biden wearing a custom mask… while mocking his creepy habit of sniffing people.
How do you know it’s good satire? For one thing, you might know because it’s got over 5 MILLION shares.
Well played.
And then Biden comes along and does something like this…
(Pay particular attention to Biden’s chin in the following photo.)
Taken from this tweet:
First pic of @JoeBiden wearing a face mask, apparently in the backyard for an Easter egg hunt. (? Biden IG) pic.twitter.com/e3MMgDmwBH — Bo Erickson CBS (@BoKnowsNews) April 12, 2020
Uh… we don’t know how to tell you this Joe, but that’s now how a mask actually works. Wear it or don’t, but half-measures like these are an apt metaphor for everything that disqualifies you from being the 46th President.
We already know he’s copped to being a ‘gaffe machine’.
At this point, is he actively TRYING to one-up the satirists?
Is this a cry for help, looking for a way out of being the Democrat Nominee?
Has he lost even more of his marbles than we had even suspected? If so, at least there’s an upside to that:
What’s the real issue here?
Is he THIS oblivious to both (a) how the world works and (b) the OPTICS of how he behaves in public?
Or…
Is the answer simpler than that? Is Biden, in the words of Foghorn Leghorn, ‘about as sharp as a bag of wet mice’?


clashdaily--2020-04-14--CLASH POLL: Is This Display Of Defiance ‘Righteous Rebellion’ Or ‘Disorderly Conduct’?

The eerie silence of empty New York streets was broken by the roar of engines from a very different kind of traffic than the city is used to seeing .
While so much of the world was dutifully doing as the government told them they must do… sheltering in place… skipping religious services… avoiding beaches and public parks… one group of rowdies had a very different idea of how to spend their down time .
And don ’ t worry about that obligation to wear masks — they ’ ve got it covered , and then some .
Trending : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place Because the swarm of people that descended on the streets of New York were not your average cars , or even motorbikes .
Many of the bikes and even 4-wheelers were *gasp* not even street-legal !
Your great-aunt Ruth may want to get her pearls handy before watching this clip… just in case .
So , Clash Nation — what do you think ?
There are a few VERY different ways to read this .
First , the more optimistic explanation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ finger to some Jackboot authorities .
They are operating in absolute defiance of the rules of the road — but then again , the roads are empty .
They ’ re rolling up on the sidewalks — which could be a nasty surprise for anyone unfortunate to step out of their building at the wrong moment .
What ’ s your take on this organized expression of rebellion ?
It ’ s not as if anyone could express their objections to government overreach through a traditional protest or march could they ?
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or Passover , and for paddleboarding or offering alternatives to abortion outside of an abortionist ’ s office ( despite following social distancing protocols ) , can you think of a BETTER way to register an objection to the government deciding your rights have been suspended ‘ for our own good ?
It looks like there ’ s a variety of responses in the comments… each apparently building off of a person ’ s starting assumptions .
We ’ ve already mentioned the pedestrian safety angle .
And that came up : As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lives of others… There was the occasional clever movie reference… And a number of interesting commenters telling us that this isn ’ t an expression of WuFlu rebellion at all , but a flashmob of unlicensed off-road vehicles that have shown themselves to be a bloody nuisance since long before now .

The eerie silence of empty New York streets was broken by the roar of engines from a very different kind of traffic than the city is used to seeing.
While so much of the world was dutifully doing as the government told them they must do… sheltering in place… skipping religious services… avoiding beaches and public parks… one group of rowdies had a very different idea of how to spend their down time.
And don’t worry about that obligation to wear masks — they’ve got it covered, and then some.
They’re wearing helmets!
Because the swarm of people that descended on the streets of New York were not your average cars, or even motorbikes.
Many of the bikes and even 4-wheelers were *gasp* not even street-legal!
Your great-aunt Ruth may want to get her pearls handy before watching this clip… just in case.
So, Clash Nation — what do you think?
There are a few VERY different ways to read this.
First, the more optimistic explanation:
They’re flipping a middle finger to some Jackboot authorities. They are operating in absolute defiance of the rules of the road — but then again, the roads are empty.
They’re rolling up on the sidewalks — which could be a nasty surprise for anyone unfortunate to step out of their building at the wrong moment.
What’s your take on this organized expression of rebellion?
It’s not as if anyone could express their objections to government overreach through a traditional protest or march could they? If people are getting tickets for celebrating Easter or Passover, and for paddleboarding or offering alternatives to abortion outside of an abortionist’s office (despite following social distancing protocols), can you think of a BETTER way to register an objection to the government deciding your rights have been suspended ‘for our own good?
It looks like there’s a variety of responses in the comments… each apparently building off of a person’s starting assumptions.
We’ve already mentioned the pedestrian safety angle. And that came up:
The Live Free angle was a recurring theme…
As was the criticism of people micro-managing the lives of others…
There was the occasional clever movie reference…
(Yes, we see what you did there…)
And a number of interesting commenters telling us that this isn’t an expression of WuFlu rebellion at all, but a flashmob of unlicensed off-road vehicles that have shown themselves to be a bloody nuisance since long before now.


clashdaily--2020-04-14--Extinction Rebellion’s Threat To Our Future

Extinction Rebellion , a radical environmental organization based in the United Kingdom ( UK ) , has been digging up lawns .
Why ?
To protest against people who invest in or otherwise support the use of fossil fuels .
But are such protests really centered on saving the environment ?
Do radical environmental groups like Extinction Rebellion help or harm society ?
Extinction Rebellion ( ER ) has become the new face of climate protest with its extreme and innovative protests .
It interrupted operations at London ’ s Heathrow Airport in 2019 .
It has organized radical protests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Lately , it has been caught digging up lawns .
First , it was lawns outside the office of the UK ’ s Secretary of State in London .
Then it was in Cambridge .
Then it disrupted the Cambridge city council meeting , forcing council members to abandon the meeting .
Screw the Environment and the People Extinction Rebellion ’ s disruptive protests raise serious questions about its intentions .
Some of its methods have drawn criticism even from leaders who support other climate protests .
If you really intend to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
If you really care about the future and people ’ s lives , why disrupt , over and over , the regular lives of ordinary people commuting to and from work ?
Such actions reveal ER ’ s intentions .
Its aim isn ’ t to protect the environment .
It ’ s to destroy it and cause inconvenience to the general public in the name of climate alarmism .
Though they are often dismissed as fringe elements , ER protesters ’ methods add to pressure from other groups like “ School @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to turn from productive endeavors to empty protests of no benefit to the environment or to people .
This kind of behavior is not unique to ER .
Many globally renowned environmental groups passionately advocate for policies and laws that harm the everyday lives of people across the world .
Greenpeace , for example , opposes developmental projects and commercial fishing in Japan .
Other organizations ’ anti-fossil and anti-development actions may not be as dramatic as ER ’ s , but they pose a higher threat to economies .
They stall key @ @ @ @ @ @ @ propel the economy and make life better for billions .
The Natural Resources Defense Council ( NRDC ) exploration and extraction of natural gas in various countries .
Yet natural gas is a , providing clean electricity while reducing emissions of the carbon dioxide NRDC blames for global warming .
NRDC , along with Friends of the Earth , the Sierra Club , the Northern Plains Resource Council , the Bold Alliance , and the Center for Biological Diversity , fought critical that transport the much-needed fuel across the contiguous U.S .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and energy development has a global footprint : in Canada , in the Philippines , stalling in India—and the list goes on and on .
The biggest of these anti-developmental lobbies is the United Nations ( UN ) .
Its Paris climate agreement calls for reduced use of fossil fuel in all member countries .
It also requires member states to make a transition to less reliable , more expensive renewable energy sources that can not or in cold countries .
For these and other reasons , the U.S. is leaving the controversial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the planet or the climate situation .
Other nations , like India , China , Japan , and Poland , continue to defy the agreement ’ s call to reduce coal intake despite pledging to do so .
The more the radical environmentalists try to extend their control , the more countries will leave international policies that are energy restrictive .
The more lunatics like ER display their theatrics , the more people will realize the ugly roots of the climate protests .
Vijay Jayaraj ( M.Sc.
, Environmental Science , University @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a Research Contributor for the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation .

Extinction Rebellion, a radical environmental organization based in the United Kingdom (UK), has been digging up lawns.
Why? To protest against people who invest in or otherwise support the use of fossil fuels.
But are such protests really centered on saving the environment? Do radical environmental groups like Extinction Rebellion help or harm society?
The Face of Radical Insanity
Extinction Rebellion (ER) has become the new face of climate protest with its extreme and innovative protests.
It interrupted operations at London’s Heathrow Airport in 2019. It has organized radical protests, blocking roads and convening disruptive gatherings in London.
Lately, it has been caught digging up lawns. First, it was lawns outside the office of the UK’s Secretary of State in London. Then it was lawns at the famous Trinity College in Cambridge.
Then it disrupted the Cambridge city council meeting, forcing council members to abandon the meeting.
Screw the Environment and the People
Extinction Rebellion’s disruptive protests raise serious questions about its intentions. Some of its methods have drawn criticism even from leaders who support other climate protests.
If you really intend to save the environment, why destroy it? If you really care about the future and people’s lives, why disrupt, over and over, the regular lives of ordinary people commuting to and from work?
Such actions reveal ER’s intentions. Its aim isn’t to protect the environment. It’s to destroy it and cause inconvenience to the general public in the name of climate alarmism.
Though they are often dismissed as fringe elements, ER protesters’ methods add to pressure from other groups like “School Strike for Climate” for younger generations to turn from productive endeavors to empty protests of no benefit to the environment or to people.
Not Just Extinction Rebellion
This kind of behavior is not unique to ER. Many globally renowned environmental groups passionately advocate for policies and laws that harm the everyday lives of people across the world.
Greenpeace, for example, opposes developmental projects and commercial fishing in Japan.
Other organizations’ anti-fossil and anti-development actions may not be as dramatic as ER’s, but they pose a higher threat to economies. They stall key developmental projects that have proven capability to propel the economy and make life better for billions.
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) opposes exploration and extraction of natural gas in various countries. Yet natural gas is a game changer in the global energy sector , providing clean electricity while reducing emissions of the carbon dioxide NRDC blames for global warming.
NRDC, along with Friends of the Earth, the Sierra Club, the Northern Plains Resource Council, the Bold Alliance, and the Center for Biological Diversity, fought critical pipeline projects that transport the much-needed fuel across the contiguous U.S.
The radical environmentalists’ war against fossil fuels and energy development has a global footprint: blocking oil projects in Canada, opposing coal plants in the Philippines, stalling hydrocarbon projects in India—and the list goes on and on.
The biggest of these anti-developmental lobbies is the United Nations (UN). Its Paris climate agreement calls for reduced use of fossil fuel in all member countries.
It also requires member states to make a transition to less reliable, more expensive renewable energy sources that cannot meet sudden surge in demands or provide adequate electricity during the winter months in cold countries.
For these and other reasons, the U.S. is leaving the controversial Paris agreement, which provides no benefit to the planet or the climate situation. Other nations, like India, China, Japan, and Poland, continue to defy the agreement’s call to reduce coal intake despite pledging to do so.
The more the radical environmentalists try to extend their control, the more countries will leave international policies that are energy restrictive.
The more lunatics like ER display their theatrics, the more people will realize the ugly roots of the climate protests.


clashdaily--2020-04-14--Ohio Judges are Out to Lunch While Kids are Out of School

Few of us think very well , and sadly , that weakness applies to judges too .
Two Ohio judges recently rendered a decision .
They told the three thousand school staff members who were trained as first responders that they can no longer bring their firearms to school unless they pass police officer training .
I ’ m not sure what problem this ruling was trying to solve .
We have many thousands of school-years of experience with volunteer armed school staff in Ohio .
So why , now , would judges reverse the standing interpretation of the state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decisions .
Part of the law says that an armed security guard must meet the standard of a law enforcement officer .
That section of the law is titled- “ 109.78 Certification of special police , security guards , or persons otherwise privately employed in a police capacity.
” ( emphasis provided by the author ) The state attorney general wrote a formal letter saying that armed volunteer teachers are not acting in a police capacity .
The judges didn ’ t believe him .
What does it mean to act in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scheduled security patrols , but armed school staff don ’ t do that .
Teachers are not required to move toward someone who is breaking Ohio ’ s laws , but the police have to .
Police make arrests and secure suspects , but armed school staff don ’ t do that , and shouldn ’ t do that .
Armed school volunteers don ’ t preserve evidence and transport suspects for processing .
School volunteers are not required to appear in court during a suspect ’ s trial .
That is what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a judge of obvious intelligence confuse the two situations ?
Armed school staff were put in place for one reason .
These volunteers said they would stop a mass murderer and treat the injured .
We are fortunate that attempted mass murder is rare .
Unfortunately , we can ’ t afford to have an armed police officer standing in every hallway in every school so he can be there when a madman wants to kill our kids .
We can ’ t afford to have an Emergency Medical Technician standing in very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Teachers volunteered to do that job , but most of the time these armed teachers are busy teaching .
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place School staff volunteered to do that job without additional pay .
They were going to put their body between a murderer and “ their kids ” , and all they wanted was the training to stop the threat .
These volunteer school staff submitted to background checks and interviews .
During their training @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than the marksmanship standard set for Ohio police officers .
The volunteers in our schools learned first-aid/trauma training to stop the bleeding after they stopped a murderous attack .
They took this training so they could keep students and staff alive until the police and EMTs arrived .
How could a judge confuse these volunteers with the duties of a police officer ?
Judges are human , and we are all captive to our experience .
The judge usually sees two types of people who have guns ; they are criminals and cops @ @ @ @ @ @ @ person with a concealed carry license as a defendant in his courtroom .
For the judge , it is the cops who are the good guys who carry guns , even though there are a hundred legally armed civilians for every sworn law enforcement officer .
For the judge , police and criminals are real , while legally armed civilians with a concealed carry license are an abstraction ; they are something the judge has read about , but has never seen .
Societies also formalize and codify behavior over time .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but now , people get licenses to cut hair , apply makeup , braid hair , and fix up your yard .
We used to carry a firearm without a permit , but now we require a license .
We used to run errands to earn some extra money , but now , many cities require a cab or coureur license to do that .
With this court ruling , these judges said that volunteer school staff need police certification and hundreds of hours of training that they ’ ll never use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ school .
We don ’ t need teachers to write parking tickets or process an accident scene .
Will a judge say that school volunteers need EMT certification in order to provide first aid ?
It is human nature to assume that our experience is ordinary .
Ordinary citizens protect our family at home and protect ourselves at work .
In contrast , our judges are protected by an armed bailiff and by law enforcement officers who work in the jails and the courtroom .
Perhaps the judge has forgotten that most of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are our first responders , at home , at work , and in public .
Judges also have to get elected .
Perhaps these judges will claim they made our children safer by requiring more training for armed school staff .
What they will deliberately ignore is putting our children at greater risk by leaving more children undefended .
79 of Ohio ’ s 88 counties had programs in place that allowed trained school volunteers to go armed .
The judges ’ ruling leaves those kids unprotected .
The judges ’ decision doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but maybe the judges are depending on campaign donations from anti-gun groups to get re-elected .
The courts will take years to correct this decision on appeal .
The legislature will probably fix it in a few months .
The good news is that we are in the middle of a quarantine due to the Wuhan flu .
Our school-age children are at home and being protected by their parents .
That gives us time before we put our children at risk in our public schools .
We all make mistakes .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one .
You can find your Ohio legislators here .
~_~_

Few of us think very well, and sadly, that weakness applies to judges too. Two Ohio judges recently rendered a decision. They told the three thousand school staff members who were trained as first responders that they can no longer bring their firearms to school unless they pass police officer training. I’m not sure what problem this ruling was trying to solve. We have many thousands of school-years of experience with volunteer armed school staff in Ohio. So why, now, would judges reverse the standing interpretation of the state attorney general?
People excuse their emotional decisions. Part of the law says that an armed security guard must meet the standard of a law enforcement officer. That section of the law is titled- “109.78 Certification of special police, security guards, or persons otherwise privately employed in a police capacity.” (emphasis provided by the author) The state attorney general wrote a formal letter saying that armed volunteer teachers are not acting in a police capacity. The judges didn’t believe him.
What does it mean to act in a police capacity? The police perform routinely scheduled security patrols, but armed school staff don’t do that. Teachers are not required to move toward someone who is breaking Ohio’s laws, but the police have to. Police make arrests and secure suspects, but armed school staff don’t do that, and shouldn’t do that. Armed school volunteers don’t preserve evidence and transport suspects for processing. School volunteers are not required to appear in court during a suspect’s trial. That is what the police do. So why would a judge of obvious intelligence confuse the two situations?
Armed school staff were put in place for one reason. These volunteers said they would stop a mass murderer and treat the injured. We are fortunate that attempted mass murder is rare. Unfortunately, we can’t afford to have an armed police officer standing in every hallway in every school so he can be there when a madman wants to kill our kids. We can’t afford to have an Emergency Medical Technician standing in very school hallway to treat the injured. Teachers volunteered to do that job, but most of the time these armed teachers are busy teaching.
School staff volunteered to do that job without additional pay. They were going to put their body between a murderer and “their kids”, and all they wanted was the training to stop the threat. These volunteer school staff submitted to background checks and interviews. During their training, they demonstrated that they shoot better than the marksmanship standard set for Ohio police officers. The volunteers in our schools learned first-aid/trauma training to stop the bleeding after they stopped a murderous attack. They took this training so they could keep students and staff alive until the police and EMTs arrived. How could a judge confuse these volunteers with the duties of a police officer?
Judges are human, and we are all captive to our experience. The judge usually sees two types of people who have guns; they are criminals and cops. The judge almost never sees a person with a concealed carry license as a defendant in his courtroom. For the judge, it is the cops who are the good guys who carry guns, even though there are a hundred legally armed civilians for every sworn law enforcement officer. For the judge, police and criminals are real, while legally armed civilians with a concealed carry license are an abstraction; they are something the judge has read about, but has never seen.
Societies also formalize and codify behavior over time. We used to do it on our own, but now, people get licenses to cut hair, apply makeup, braid hair, and fix up your yard. We used to carry a firearm without a permit, but now we require a license. We used to run errands to earn some extra money, but now, many cities require a cab or coureur license to do that. With this court ruling, these judges said that volunteer school staff need police certification and hundreds of hours of training that they’ll never use so they can protect our kids in school. We don’t need teachers to write parking tickets or process an accident scene. Will a judge say that school volunteers need EMT certification in order to provide first aid?
It is human nature to assume that our experience is ordinary. Ordinary citizens protect our family at home and protect ourselves at work. In contrast, our judges are protected by an armed bailiff and by law enforcement officers who work in the jails and the courtroom. Perhaps the judge has forgotten that most of us provide our own protection. We are our first responders, at home, at work, and in public.
Judges also have to get elected. Perhaps these judges will claim they made our children safer by requiring more training for armed school staff. What they will deliberately ignore is putting our children at greater risk by leaving more children undefended. 79 of Ohio’s 88 counties had programs in place that allowed trained school volunteers to go armed. The judges’ ruling leaves those kids unprotected. The judges’ decision doesn’t make sense to me, but maybe the judges are depending on campaign donations from anti-gun groups to get re-elected.
The courts will take years to correct this decision on appeal. The legislature will probably fix it in a few months. The good news is that we are in the middle of a quarantine due to the Wuhan flu. Our school-age children are at home and being protected by their parents. That gives us time before we put our children at risk in our public schools.
We all make mistakes. It is up to us to fix this one. You can find your Ohio legislators here.
~_~_
Sources-
“https://chroniclet.com/news/208552/court-ohio-school-workers-must-have-training-to-carry-guns/
“https://www.wcbe.org/post/appeals-court-overturns-ruling-allowing-school-employees-carry-concealed-weapons
“https://law.justia.com/cases/ohio/twelfth-district-court-of-appeals/2020/ca2019-03-051.html
“http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/109.78
“https://fastersaveslives.org/resources
“https://fastersaveslives.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/FASTER-White-Paper_REV032816.pdf


clashdaily--2020-04-13--BREAKING: Bernie Throws His Support Behind Sleepy Joe (VIDEO)

The big question is whether Bernie ’ s supporters will do the same .
Bernie , the supposed leader of a “ movement ” , just folded like a cheap suit .
The endorsement came during a Zoom meeting with Biden that was broadcast for the public .
It comes as quite a surprise after Bernie suspended his campaign last week but refused to withdraw completely , hoping to secure more delegates in order to force the Democrats further left at the convention .
It would seem that uniting the Democrats in order to defeat Trump is more important than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place Ex-Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders ( I-Vt. ) endorsed former rival Joe Biden during a virtual event Monday .
“ We need you in the White House .
I will do all that I can to see that that happens , Joe , ” Sanders told Biden during the former vice president ’ s virtual event on the coronavirus .
“ Today , I am asking all Americans — I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m asking every independent , I ’ m asking a lot of Republicans — to come together in this campaign to support your candidacy , which I endorse , ” Sanders added .
What a good , little Independent caving to the will of the Democratic Party like that !
Let ’ s hope he ’ s richly rewarded for his obedience and coming to heel like a good boy with perhaps a pat on his head and a pudding cup–because you know that he ’ s not the right race , gender @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s running mate .
Biden was grateful for the endorsement .
He ’ s going to need every endorsement that he gets .
Joe seems to be a bit confused these days with a number of gaffes and an inability to keep hold of his thoughts long enough to express them .
Speaking of things not looking great , this news came out on the same day that The New York Times posted an article reporting that the former Democrat Vice President didn ’ t “ reach out ” to a 30-year old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two short years ago .
This is somehow “ newsworthy.
” During the phone interview , AOC said that in order to get a vocal endorsement , Biden has to go further left and embrace some of her far-left positions whole-heartedly .
She said that Joe ’ s floated compromise on Medicare-For-All–dropping the age limit down to 60–was just “ insulting.
” The Bernie Bros ate it up , though .
Someone has a high opinion of herself considering the candidate that she backed just endorsed his competitor .
Meanwhile , the Democratic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to which both Bernie and AOC ascribe , refuses to endorse Joe .
It ’ s also pretty clear that Bernie fans aren ’ t so keen on Joe .
It ’ s going to be very interesting watching how this plays out .
I don ’ t know about you , but I plan to enjoy every single second of it !

The big question is whether Bernie’s supporters will do the same.
Bernie, the supposed leader of a “movement”, just folded like a cheap suit.
The endorsement came during a Zoom meeting with Biden that was broadcast for the public. It comes as quite a surprise after Bernie suspended his campaign last week but refused to withdraw completely, hoping to secure more delegates in order to force the Democrats further left at the convention.
It would seem that uniting the Democrats in order to defeat Trump is more important than his commitment to “democratic socialism.”
Ex-Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) endorsed former rival Joe Biden during a virtual event Monday. “We need you in the White House. I will do all that I can to see that that happens, Joe,” Sanders told Biden during the former vice president’s virtual event on the coronavirus. “Today, I am asking all Americans — I’m asking every Democrat, I’m asking every independent, I’m asking a lot of Republicans — to come together in this campaign to support your candidacy, which I endorse,” Sanders added.
BREAKING: Bernie Sanders endorses Joe Biden: “Today, I am asking all Americans—I’m asking every Democrat, I’m asking every Independent, I’m asking a lot of Republicans—to come together in this campaign to support your candidacy.” https://t.co/gzzYTHToEX pic.twitter.com/BsMAbnso8Q — ABC News (@ABC) April 13, 2020
What a good, little Independent caving to the will of the Democratic Party like that!
Let’s hope he’s richly rewarded for his obedience and coming to heel like a good boy with perhaps a pat on his head and a pudding cup–because you know that he’s not the right race, gender, or age to be Joe’s running mate.
Biden was grateful for the endorsement.
“I think that your endorsement means a great deal. It means a great deal to me. I think people are going to be surprised that we are apart on some issues but we’re awfully close,” Biden told Sanders. “I’m going to need you, not just to win the campaign, but to govern.” Source: The Hill
He’s going to need every endorsement that he gets.
Joe seems to be a bit confused these days with a number of gaffes and an inability to keep hold of his thoughts long enough to express them.
Biden announces that he and Bernie will establish "six policy working groups" to focus on:
-On the economy
-On education
-On criminal justice
-On immigration,
-On climate change
(He didn't mention the sixth) — Philip Wegmann (@PhilipWegmann) April 13, 2020
That’s not looking great.
Speaking of things not looking great, this news came out on the same day that The New York Times posted an article reporting that the former Democrat Vice President didn’t “reach out” to a 30-year old freshman Congresswoman who was a bartender just two short years ago.
This is somehow “newsworthy.”
During the phone interview, AOC said that in order to get a vocal endorsement, Biden has to go further left and embrace some of her far-left positions whole-heartedly. She said that Joe’s floated compromise on Medicare-For-All–dropping the age limit down to 60–was just “insulting.”
The Bernie Bros ate it up, though.
“They floated this olive branch to the progressive left of lowering the Medicare age to 60. And it’s almost insulting.” @AOC https://t.co/BDI538nyFF — People for Bernie (@People4Bernie) April 13, 2020
Someone has a high opinion of herself considering the candidate that she backed just endorsed his competitor.
Meanwhile, the Democratic Socialists of America, the political ideology to which both Bernie and AOC ascribe, refuses to endorse Joe.
We are not endorsing @JoeBiden. — DSA ? (@DemSocialists) April 12, 2020
It’s also pretty clear that Bernie fans aren’t so keen on Joe.
A meme picking up traction on tiktok is the Please Don’t Make Me Vote For Joe Biden chant, which these two started and has been sampled by thousands of others since pic.twitter.com/ORXDSIj2GP — ???????? ??????? ಠ_ಠ 2͎0͎2͎0͎ (@ChappellTracker) April 12, 2020
this man had one wish. one. “please don’t make me vote for joe biden.” and what do y’all do? make him vote for joe biden. smh. pic.twitter.com/ANYhIgwVHy — sipora (@siporawest) April 8, 2020
It’s going to be very interesting watching how this plays out.
I don’t know about you, but I plan to enjoy every single second of it!


clashdaily--2020-04-13--Trump Taking Heat Over A ‘FireFauci’ Retweet — Here’s The 411

This time , he ’ s not even getting dragged for something HE said , so much as something he retweeted .
A Conservative chica who took her shot in a run against Nancy Pelosi said something that caught the President ’ s eye , and got a retweet with a comment .
For those unfamiliar with here , here ’ s her Twitter bio : “ I ’ m DeAnna Lorraine , Conservative Sicilian spitfire running against Nancy Pelosi for Congress .
I will replace her soulless leadership with love , laws , & fierce patriotism.
” Here was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ current controversy : The part that ’ s getting the attention is the hashtag at the bottom : # FireFauci Here ’ s how WaPo is framing it ( taken from a social media screengrab from someone I know on the Left ) : Trump came into the controversy with this retweet : It has a couple of parts .
The # FireFauci hashtag is only ONE part of it .
Is it the part he wanted to inject into the conversation ?
Or was his interest in some OTHER part of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) ambiguous as to whether he agrees with the controversial hashtag .
More plausibly , he ’ s defending himself against the ‘ blood on his hands ’ accusation that has been a preferred line of attack on the part of Democrats .
If only Trump had acted earlier , the claim goes .
What is the President saying in response ?
‘ Fake News ’ — which is a more socially appropriate version of saying that the accusations against him are unfounded horses**t. He is giving his reply — ‘ fake news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In the second part of his answer , he explained why it was fake .
The claim — that Trump waited too long to heed the advice of medical experts — doesn ’ t square very well with what we know about the timeline — or even Fauci ’ s OWN role in the timeline .
Now that she ’ s found herself in the firestorm , she ’ s doubled down on that controversial hashtag .
Both with her OWN tweets , and retweets of others .
Suppose there is some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — where Fauci needs to remain on — is there nothing preventing Trump from adding in some other experts with dissenting voices ?

This time, he’s not even getting dragged for something HE said, so much as something he retweeted.
A Conservative chica who took her shot in a run against Nancy Pelosi said something that caught the President’s eye, and got a retweet with a comment.
For those unfamiliar with here, here’s her Twitter bio: “I’m DeAnna Lorraine, Conservative Sicilian spitfire running against Nancy Pelosi for Congress. I will replace her soulless leadership with love, laws, & fierce patriotism.”
Here was the tweet at the heart of the current controversy:
Fauci is now saying that had Trump listened to the medical experts earlier he could’ve saved more lives. Fauci was telling people on February 29th that there was nothing to worry about and it posed no threat to the US public at large. Time to #FireFauci… — DeAnna Lorraine ?? (@DeAnna4Congress) April 12, 2020
The part that’s getting the attention is the hashtag at the bottom: #FireFauci
Here’s how WaPo is framing it (taken from a social media screengrab from someone I know on the Left):
Trump came into the controversy with this retweet:
Sorry Fake News, it’s all on tape. I banned China long before people spoke up. Thank you @OANN https://t.co/d40JQkUZg5 — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 12, 2020
Let’s break this tweet down.
It has a couple of parts. The #FireFauci hashtag is only ONE part of it. Is it the part he wanted to inject into the conversation? Or was his interest in some OTHER part of the tweet?
It is (at WORST) ambiguous as to whether he agrees with the controversial hashtag.
More plausibly, he’s defending himself against the ‘blood on his hands’ accusation that has been a preferred line of attack on the part of Democrats.
If only Trump had acted earlier, the claim goes.
What is the President saying in response?
‘Fake News’ — which is a more socially appropriate version of saying that the accusations against him are unfounded horses**t.
He is giving his reply — ‘fake news’ he was putting that marker down. In the second part of his answer, he explained why it was fake.
The claim — that Trump waited too long to heed the advice of medical experts — doesn’t square very well with what we know about the timeline — or even Fauci’s OWN role in the timeline.
Fauci: February 29. The problem is Trump DID listen to the “experts” pic.twitter.com/PxwbdQ5WSu — Steph (@steph93065) April 12, 2020
Now that she’s found herself in the firestorm, she’s doubled down on that controversial hashtag.
Both with her OWN tweets, and retweets of others.
Jan: Fauci told us it was no threat to Americans Feb: Fauci told us to continue going to gyms, malls, and the movies Mar: Fauci said going on cruises was OK He’s been wrong every step of the way and is now blaming @realDonaldTrump for his failures. #FireFauci — John Cardillo (@johncardillo) April 13, 2020
Here's an email from Anthony Fauci to Cheryl Mills praising Hillary Clinton's "stamina and capability" during the Benghazi Hearings. Also, notice how he claims she "hit out of the park" and makes sure to include that he "loves" her. That is all you need to know.#FireFauci pic.twitter.com/ERRSjO2QXq — DeAnna Lorraine ?? (@DeAnna4Congress) April 13, 2020
Forget all the questionable stuff about Fauci for a minute. Why is he constantly on CNN & MSNBC when all they do is try to goad him into making anti-Trump statements? That alone is suspect. Pair that with everything else & its abundantly clear #FireFauci is the move. — DeAnna Lorraine ?? (@DeAnna4Congress) April 13, 2020
The Liberals are bothered that Trump quote retweeted my #FireFauci tweet so they're now trying to get #FireTrump to be a thing. Sorry, we're not firing the best President of all time. He's not going anywhere in November either. Four more years. Deal with it. — DeAnna Lorraine ?? (@DeAnna4Congress) April 13, 2020
Suppose there is some reason practical, political, or otherwise — where Fauci needs to remain on — is there nothing preventing Trump from adding in some other experts with dissenting voices?


clashdaily--2020-04-13--CLASH POLL: What Do YOU Think Of The TikTok Videos Of Dancing Medical Professionals?

One weird thing about the coronavirus is the number of viral videos of doctors and nurses dancing in hospitals .
Medical professionals are taking videos of choreographed routines performed in hospitals or on hospital grounds , often decked out in scrubs and their personal protective equipment ( PPE ) like masks , gowns , and gloves .
Some say that this is a reasonable way for medical professionals to let off some steam as the world is in the midst of a global pandemic .
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claim that this is proof positive that the hospitalizations and consequences of COVID-19 are overblown .
Clearly , the Tweeters state , if doctors and nurses can choreograph and rehearse a dance for likes and clicks , the situation isn ’ t so serious after all .
It seems like a waste of PPE which we have a shortage of right now .
The real problem is that many people are just getting really annoyed with it .
Twitter user Susan St. James seems to have clinched it right here : Kudos to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dancing thing isn ’ t just in the U.S. either… it ’ s a worldwide thing .
So , what do you think of this new online trend ?

One weird thing about the coronavirus is the number of viral videos of doctors and nurses dancing in hospitals.
Medical professionals are taking videos of choreographed routines performed in hospitals or on hospital grounds, often decked out in scrubs and their personal protective equipment(PPE) like masks, gowns, and gloves.
Some say that this is a reasonable way for medical professionals to let off some steam as the world is in the midst of a global pandemic.
As seen in #China, US #CoronaVirus ICU nurses dancing to improve moral.pic.twitter.com/CTw6AqSspN — Coronavirus Updates – Alexander Higgins (@kr3at) April 11, 2020
WE SEE YOU, JILL! This viral video of an MD Anderson nurse dancing in her PPE got the attention of none other than Janet Jackson! https://t.co/jgxRXY3VhM pic.twitter.com/gy1mYiq0qr — ABC13 Houston (@abc13houston) April 3, 2020
The level-up is real! Shoutout to the nurses at Jefferson Hospital in Philadelphia, PA. (?: @tjuh_pool via IG) pic.twitter.com/zHRTR248JF — ESSENCE (@Essence) April 8, 2020
Mainstream media: hospitals are overwhelmed, everyone is dying! Also mainstream media: here's a tiktok of dancing nurses during the #COVID19outbreak pic.twitter.com/BzMw8DlPgw — Cuomo's Nipple Rings (@ill_drew) April 6, 2020
When your lunch breaks can no longer be taken in the cafeteria, face time is not available but bootie dancing is safe. pic.twitter.com/ERd5Yz63l6 — NWOB_org_nurses (@nwob_org_Nurses) April 9, 2020
Others claim that this is proof positive that the hospitalizations and consequences of COVID-19 are overblown. Clearly, the Tweeters state, if doctors and nurses can choreograph and rehearse a dance for likes and clicks, the situation isn’t so serious after all.
If dancing nurses in countless videos doesn’t make normies stop and think for even a second that perhaps all of this is at the very least over blown, what makes you think you can reach these people and help them think clearly and freely or have the basic capacity #LockdownEaster pic.twitter.com/ZudFPoD1lb — ᎠᏒIIIVΞᏒ (@DRIIIV3R) April 12, 2020
It seems like a waste of PPE which we have a shortage of right now.
The real problem is that many people are just getting really annoyed with it.
Twitter user Susan St. James seems to have clinched it right here:
I don't want to offend anybody, but I have to speak my mind. I'm starting to get pissed off by seeing these dancing nurses. The hospitals are so slow with nobody at all coming in that nurses can make stupid videos while I'm stuck at home away from my job. pic.twitter.com/Nb4D5BKnqH — Susan St. James (@SusanStJames3) April 13, 2020
Kudos to Susan with the awesome tweet!
This dancing thing isn’t just in the U.S. either… it’s a worldwide thing.
#COVID19: Medical Professionals in all over world are filming themselves dancing, Singing to boost morale during coronavirus crisis pic.twitter.com/SynhiY8bTy — World Updates (@Rntk____) April 8, 2020
These doctors and nurses are dancing to keep their spirits up during the fight against coronavirus. Iran is facing medical supply shortages as a result of sanctions. pic.twitter.com/VDgizIADQz — AJ+ (@ajplus) March 6, 2020
Doctors and nurses from Ichilov Hospital made a video of them dancing to cheer the people during this hard time. pic.twitter.com/x8DbH776ie — Noy (@Noyalevy_) April 6, 2020
So, what do you think of this new online trend?
Is it cute?
Is it cool?
Is it completely tone-deaf?


clashdaily--2020-04-13--Joe Biden’s Accuser Files Criminal Complaint–NY Times And WaPo Go Into Damage Control Mode

The former Senate staffer for Joe Biden has filed a report with the Washington , D.C. police alleging sexual assault .
Tara Reade came forward saying that she had been sexually assaulted by Joe Biden in 1993 .
It is almost never a clear-cut case in instances of He Said/She Said sexual assault allegations with no witnesses or corroborating evidence .
In a normal world , we could look at the allegation and weigh it against evidence , and attempt to come to a determination .
But our Media ( D ) have all decided to cover the allegations in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leaning of the accused .
Back in 2016 , NBC hung onto a story about Trump ’ s “ hot mic ” braggadocio about his female conquests to Billy Bush and released it when it could do the most political damage .
In the notorious clip , Trump famously said , “ And when you ’ re a star they let you do it .
You can do anything .
Grab them by the p***y .
You can do anything.
” Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In Place It ’ s interesting now that Tara Reade has said that Joe Biden reached up her skirt and did just that in 1993 that the partisan press has decided to “ examine ” the allegations against Biden .
I don ’ t recall them giving Christine Blasey Ford , Deborah Ramirez , or nut-job Julie Swetnik a second look when they all had substantially less credible accusations against Brett Kavanaugh .
An “ examination of the sexual assault allegation ” is precisely what many conservatives wanted when a Supreme Court Justice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that spanned pinning down Blasey Ford on a bed , to yanking his pants down at a college party and shoving “ Little Brett ” at Ramirez ’ s face , to running a gang-rape ring while he was a sophomore in high school ( while wearing his school uniform ) at parties that Julie Swetnick , a college student at the time , frequented .
Reade ’ s allegation is very different .
So , let ’ s let the New York Times examine it .
Starting with the subheading , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clearly , this is a pro-Biden piece meant to discredit Tara Reade .
Reade may be making up her allegation , and there were some clues that this might be the case–she kept quiet for a long time , she initially about the same discomfort with hair-sniffing and shoulder touching that other women came forward without the sexual assault accusation , and she was a Bernie supporter .
Now let ’ s examine how the “ Gray Lady ” examined the allegation .
First , the slant was clear .
Then , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ damning to Biden .
Last year , Ms. Reade and seven other women came forward to accuse Mr. Biden of kissing , hugging or touching them in ways that made them feel uncomfortable .
Ms. Reade told The Times then that Mr. Biden had publicly stroked her neck , wrapped his fingers in her hair and touched her in ways that made her uncomfortable .
Soon after Ms. Reade made the new allegation , in a podcast interview released on March 25 , The Times began reporting on her account and seeking corroboration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Times interviewed Ms. Reade on multiple days over hours , as well as those she told about Mr. Biden ’ s behavior and other friends .
The Times has also interviewed lawyers who spoke to Ms. Reade about her allegation ; nearly two dozen people who worked with Mr. Biden during the early 1990s , including many who worked with Ms. Reade ; and the other seven women who criticized Mr. Biden last year , to discuss their experiences with him .
No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former Biden staff members corroborate any details of Ms. Reade ’ s allegation .
The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden .
In the original article , the last sentence in the above quote read , “ The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden beyond the hugs , kisses , and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable.
” The Times thought that this line was so compelling that they used it in a tweet to promote the article , which they later deleted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not alone .
The Washington Post has been examining Tara Reade ’ s allegation over the past three weeks , since she said on a podcast that Biden had pinned her against a wall , reached under her skirt and pushed his fingers inside her .
At the time , she was a 29-year-old staff assistant… …On Thursday , Reade filed a complaint with D.C. police .
She told The Post she did so because she is being harassed online and wanted law enforcement to be aware of her claim .
A public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden but says Reade “ disclosed that she believes she was the victim of a sexual assault ” in 1993 .
Reade told The Post she gave police a long interview describing the alleged assault by Biden .
The portion of the police report detailing her allegation is not public .
Filing a false report is a crime punishable by up to 30 days in jail .
Reinhard said that The Post has interviewed Reade , more than a half-dozen of Biden ’ s former Senate staffers , and the individuals that Reade @ @ @ @ @ @ @ assault .
Reade said she described the alleged assault soon after it happened to her mother , who died in 2016 , and to a friend , a former intern for another lawmaker .
In an interview , the friend corroborated Reade ’ s account of their conversation but declined to be named in this report .
In another recent interview , Reade ’ s brother , Collin Moulton , said she told him in 1993 that Biden had behaved inappropriately by touching her neck and shoulders .
Their mother urged Reade to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adding that he felt “ ashamed now for not being a better advocate ” for his sister .
Several days after that interview , he said in a text message that he recalled her telling him that Biden had put his hand “ under her clothes.
” The article states that Reade was afraid of speaking about the assault last year , but has filed the report because she is being harassed online and wanted law enforcement to have a record of her complaint .
Filing a false police report is punishable by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then quotes several sources close to Biden denying the allegations .
The campaign also released a statement attributed to Marianne Baker , who was an executive assistant in the office and one of the supervisors to whom Reade says she made a harassment complaint .
“ In all my years working for Sen. Biden , I never once witnessed , or heard of , or received , any reports of inappropriate conduct , period — not from Ms. Reade , not from anyone , ” Baker said .
“ I have absolutely no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s accounting of events , which would have left a searing impression on me as a woman professional , and as a manager .
These clearly false allegations are in complete contradiction to both the inner workings of our Senate office and to the man I know and worked so closely with for almost two decades.
” Source : Washington Post The article was criticized by actress Rose McGowan , the first woman to come forward accusing Harvey Weinstein of rape which kicked off the # MeToo movement .
She called it “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ piece ” against Tara Reade .
She also went right after Beth Reinhard directly .
It ’ s pretty clear where the Partisan Presstitutes are on this issue .
Are you really surprised ?
Look at how the Media ( D ) handled the Bill Clinton accusations .
Juanita Broaddrick could tell you all about that .
They ’ re all-in for Joe because , to them , it ’ s better to have a man who may have actually grabbed a woman by the p***y as President than one who just talked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ realize he was being recorded .

The former Senate staffer for Joe Biden has filed a report with the Washington, D.C. police alleging sexual assault.
Tara Reade came forward saying that she had been sexually assaulted by Joe Biden in 1993. It is almost never a clear-cut case in instances of He Said/She Said sexual assault allegations with no witnesses or corroborating evidence. In a normal world, we could look at the allegation and weigh it against evidence, and attempt to come to a determination. But our Media(D) have all decided to cover the allegations in a different light depending on which political leaning of the accused.
Back in 2016, NBC hung onto a story about Trump’s “hot mic” braggadocio about his female conquests to Billy Bush and released it when it could do the most political damage. In the notorious clip, Trump famously said, “And when you’re a star they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the p***y. You can do anything.”
The media went absolutely batcrap crazy.
It’s interesting now that Tara Reade has said that Joe Biden reached up her skirt and did just that in 1993 that the partisan press has decided to “examine” the allegations against Biden.
I don’t recall them giving Christine Blasey Ford, Deborah Ramirez, or nut-job Julie Swetnik a second look when they all had substantially less credible accusations against Brett Kavanaugh.
An “examination of the sexual assault allegation” is precisely what many conservatives wanted when a Supreme Court Justice nominee was hounded by ever-more ridiculous accusations that spanned pinning down Blasey Ford on a bed, to yanking his pants down at a college party and shoving “Little Brett” at Ramirez’s face, to running a gang-rape ring while he was a sophomore in high school (while wearing his school uniform) at parties that Julie Swetnick, a college student at the time, frequented.
Reade’s allegation is very different.
So, let’s let the New York Times examine it. Starting with the subheading, the Times starts running interference for Biden.
Ms. Reade, a former Senate aide, has accused Mr. Biden of assaulting her in 1993 and says she told others about it. A Biden spokeswoman said the allegation is false, and former Senate office staff members do not recall such an incident.
Clearly, this is a pro-Biden piece meant to discredit Tara Reade.
Reade may be making up her allegation, and there were some clues that this might be the case–she kept quiet for a long time, she initially about the same discomfort with hair-sniffing and shoulder touching that other women came forward without the sexual assault accusation, and she was a Bernie supporter.
Now let’s examine how the “Gray Lady” examined the allegation.
First, the slant was clear.
The Tara Reade story is in the print NYT today but look how unfair to her the subhed is. She doesn’t just SAY she told friends and family—three of them have personally confirmed that she did! pic.twitter.com/LmupPFOGSq — Nathan J Robinson (@NathanJRobinson) April 13, 2020
Then, they deleted portions of the article that were damning to Biden.
Last year, Ms. Reade and seven other women came forward to accuse Mr. Biden of kissing, hugging or touching them in ways that made them feel uncomfortable. Ms. Reade told The Times then that Mr. Biden had publicly stroked her neck, wrapped his fingers in her hair and touched her in ways that made her uncomfortable. Soon after Ms. Reade made the new allegation, in a podcast interview released on March 25, The Times began reporting on her account and seeking corroboration through interviews, documents and other sources. The Times interviewed Ms. Reade on multiple days over hours, as well as those she told about Mr. Biden’s behavior and other friends. The Times has also interviewed lawyers who spoke to Ms. Reade about her allegation; nearly two dozen people who worked with Mr. Biden during the early 1990s, including many who worked with Ms. Reade; and the other seven women who criticized Mr. Biden last year, to discuss their experiences with him. No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of reporting, nor did any former Biden staff members corroborate any details of Ms. Reade’s allegation. The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden. Source: New York Times
In the original article, the last sentence in the above quote read, “The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden beyond the hugs, kisses, and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable.”
The Times thought that this line was so compelling that they used it in a tweet to promote the article, which they later deleted.
Wait what IS this sentence? pic.twitter.com/K4p91esw6n — Slade (@Slade) April 12, 2020
We've deleted a tweet in this thread that had some imprecise language that has been changed in the story. — The New York Times (@nytimes) April 12, 2020
The New York Times might not find Reade credible, but a lot of women have come forward saying they had physical interactions with Biden that made them uncomfortable. And the New York Times just erased them. https://t.co/6qJWe3ZOXf — Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) April 12, 2020
But the New York Times is not alone.
Beth Reinhard from The Washington Post wrote a similar article.
The Washington Post has been examining Tara Reade’s allegation over the past three weeks, since she said on a podcast that Biden had pinned her against a wall, reached under her skirt and pushed his fingers inside her. At the time, she was a 29-year-old staff assistant… …On Thursday, Reade filed a complaint with D.C. police. She told The Post she did so because she is being harassed online and wanted law enforcement to be aware of her claim. A public record of the complaint does not name Biden but says Reade “disclosed that she believes she was the victim of a sexual assault” in 1993. Reade told The Post she gave police a long interview describing the alleged assault by Biden. The portion of the police report detailing her allegation is not public. Filing a false report is a crime punishable by up to 30 days in jail.
The former vice president has been accused by several women of unwanted touching, but The Post found no other allegations against him as serious as Reade’s. — Beth Reinhard (@bethreinhard) April 13, 2020
Reinhard said that The Post has interviewed Reade, more than a half-dozen of Biden’s former Senate staffers, and the individuals that Reade claimed that spoke to about the alleged assault.
Reade said she described the alleged assault soon after it happened to her mother, who died in 2016, and to a friend, a former intern for another lawmaker. In an interview, the friend corroborated Reade’s account of their conversation but declined to be named in this report. In another recent interview, Reade’s brother, Collin Moulton, said she told him in 1993 that Biden had behaved inappropriately by touching her neck and shoulders. Their mother urged Reade to contact the police, Moulton said, adding that he felt “ashamed now for not being a better advocate” for his sister. Several days after that interview, he said in a text message that he recalled her telling him that Biden had put his hand “under her clothes.”
The article states that Reade was afraid of speaking about the assault last year, but has filed the report because she is being harassed online and wanted law enforcement to have a record of her complaint. Filing a false police report is punishable by 30 days in jail.
The article then quotes several sources close to Biden denying the allegations.
The campaign also released a statement attributed to Marianne Baker, who was an executive assistant in the office and one of the supervisors to whom Reade says she made a harassment complaint. “In all my years working for Sen. Biden, I never once witnessed, or heard of, or received, any reports of inappropriate conduct, period — not from Ms. Reade, not from anyone,” Baker said. “I have absolutely no knowledge or memory of Ms. Reade’s accounting of events, which would have left a searing impression on me as a woman professional, and as a manager. These clearly false allegations are in complete contradiction to both the inner workings of our Senate office and to the man I know and worked so closely with for almost two decades.”
Source: Washington Post
The article was criticized by actress Rose McGowan, the first woman to come forward accusing Harvey Weinstein of rape which kicked off the #MeToo movement. She called it “slanted journalism” and a “hit piece” against Tara Reade.
This is not journalism, this is an agenda. This is a hit piece. You’ve sunk to a new low in slanted journalism and victim shaming @washingtonpost https://t.co/b32kjsyHoA — rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) April 13, 2020
She also went right after Beth Reinhard directly.
As a survivor, the way you launched into this woman’s assault is truly vile. I feel violated by your shitty writing @bethreinhard. @washingtonpost your motto is ‘Democracy Dies in Darkness’ well I guess it’s dead because you are dark. Evil lives and it loves the DNC pic.twitter.com/LnZ9NdLQEj — rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) April 13, 2020
It’s pretty clear where the Partisan Presstitutes are on this issue.
Are you really surprised? Look at how the Media(D) handled the Bill Clinton accusations. Juanita Broaddrick could tell you all about that.
They’re all-in for Joe because, to them, it’s better to have a man who may have actually grabbed a woman by the p***y as President than one who just talked about it when he didn’t realize he was being recorded.


clashdaily--2020-04-13--Dr. Fauci Floats ‘New’ Coronavirus Idea That Stalin Would Have Loved

It makes you wonder whether Trump needs to swap out his ‘ experts ’ — or , failing that , at least add a few with dissenting voices… preferably without an authoritarian streak .
Somehow in this crisis , Dr. Fauci has become The Expert™ and almost demigod status among the media , who now take his word as absolute .
Of course , that ’ s a little tough to square with the gloom-and-doom he ’ s been spewing with projections of ‘ hundreds of thousands dead ’ as the best-case scenario to stave off the possible 2.2 million @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face of real-world numbers to new projections of ‘ merely ’ tens of thousands .
But NOW he ’ s in favor of another NEW idea !
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place Dr. Anthony Fauci confirmed Friday the idea of Americans carrying “ certificates of immunity ” is being considered as a possibility to identify people who have been infected with the coronavirus and help reopen the U.S. economy in the coming weeks .
“ Can you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of immunity ?
” CNN “ New Day ” host Alisyn Camerota asked Fauci during an interview Friday .
“ You know , that ’ s possible , ” Fauci , the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , replied .
— WesternJournal That ’ s got such a nice East Berlin ring to it , doesn ’ t it ?
It ’ s still hard to imagine any American accepting a need to show government authentication as proof that they ’ re ok to travel in the US @ @ @ @ @ @ @ look at that ‘ permit ’ .

It makes you wonder whether Trump needs to swap out his ‘experts’ — or, failing that, at least add a few with dissenting voices… preferably without an authoritarian streak.
Somehow in this crisis, Dr. Fauci has become The Expert™ and almost demigod status among the media, who now take his word as absolute.
Of course, that’s a little tough to square with the gloom-and-doom he’s been spewing with projections of ‘hundreds of thousands dead’ as the best-case scenario to stave off the possible 2.2 million number is now melting away in the face of real-world numbers to new projections of ‘merely’ tens of thousands.
But NOW he’s in favor of another NEW idea!
Dr. Anthony Fauci confirmed Friday the idea of Americans carrying “certificates of immunity” is being considered as a possibility to identify people who have been infected with the coronavirus and help reopen the U.S. economy in the coming weeks. “Can you imagine a time where Americans carry certificates of immunity?” CNN “New Day” host Alisyn Camerota asked Fauci during an interview Friday. “You know, that’s possible,” Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, replied. — WesternJournal
That’s got such a nice East Berlin ring to it, doesn’t it?
It’s still hard to imagine any American accepting a need to show government authentication as proof that they’re ok to travel in the US of A.
“Do you haff your pay-pahs?”
Here’s a closer look at that ‘permit’.


clashdaily--2020-04-13--Ted Cruz: The Critical Danger Facing Our Energy Sector, And What We’re Doing About It (Video)

President Trump tweeted about this this morning .
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place Before the Enviro-nuts start gloating about the demise of the industry this just makes us more dependent on places like Russia and Saudi Arabia .
Ted Cruz was on a conference call with Saudi leaders and tells us EXACTLY what he said to them to get their attention .
Under Trump , America finally achieved the decades-long goal of energy independence .
Now , other oil nations are exploiting the Coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oil producers to ( literally ) ‘ destroy the competition ’ .
For all the Left ’ s drum-beating about ‘ big oil ’ a lot of these producers are NOT the mega-corps .
They ’ re independent outfits .
Independent outfits being jackhammered by an economic game of chicken originating in Russia and Saudi-Arabia .
Russia and Saudi Arabia aren ’ t worried about bankruptcies .
But America is another story .
Energy sector expert , Wil VanLoh , joins Ted Cruz and to explain the national crisis unfolding that nobody wants @ @ @ @ @ @ @ implications of this are on his radar , Trump is already taking action on this , as you will hear on the video .
Just how much help do you suppose the energy sector ( and the implications on National Security that flow out of our energy independence ) get from Joe Biden ’ s policies ?
We ’ ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with a less than stellar past , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .
By the way , since Facebook unpublished ClashDaily ’ s original page , your best bet to keep in the loop is to Subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here : But , you know us here at Clash , we don ’ t give up easily .
We ’ ve set up an outpost behind enemy lines .
If you ’ re still on Facebook , check out our @ @ @ @

***UPDATE***
President Trump tweeted about this this morning.
….disaster, the Energy Industry will be strong again, far faster than currently anticipated. Thank you to all of those who worked with me on getting this very big business back on track, in particular Russia and Saudi Arabia. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 13, 2020
***END UPDATE***
Before the Enviro-nuts start gloating about the demise of the industry this just makes us more dependent on places like Russia and Saudi Arabia.
Ted Cruz was on a conference call with Saudi leaders and tells us EXACTLY what he said to them to get their attention.
Under Trump, America finally achieved the decades-long goal of energy independence. Now, other oil nations are exploiting the Coronavirus scare in an attempt to bankrupt our oil producers to (literally) ‘destroy the competition’.
For all the Left’s drum-beating about ‘big oil’ a lot of these producers are NOT the mega-corps. They’re independent outfits.
Independent outfits being jackhammered by an economic game of chicken originating in Russia and Saudi-Arabia. Russia and Saudi Arabia aren’t worried about bankruptcies.
But America is another story.
Energy sector expert, Wil VanLoh, joins Ted Cruz and to explain the national crisis unfolding that nobody wants to talk about.
Now that the implications of this are on his radar, Trump is already taking action on this, as you will hear on the video.
Just how much help do you suppose the energy sector (and the implications on National Security that flow out of our energy independence) get from Joe Biden’s policies?
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.
By the way, since Facebook unpublished ClashDaily’s original page, your best bet to keep in the loop is to Subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
Become a Clash Insider! Sign up for our free email newslettaer, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
But, you know us here at Clash, we don’t give up easily. We’ve set up an outpost behind enemy lines. If you’re still on Facebook, check out our upstart ClashBriefing page.