clashdaily--2020-02-10--Dear Leftists: The Medal Of Freedom Has Been Given To Individuals Just As Partisan As Rush Limbaugh

Dear Leftists: The Medal Of Freedom Has Been Given To Individuals Just As Partisan As Rush Limbaugh (Video)

The left is still freaking out that right-wing talk show legend Rush Limbaugh was given the Presidential Medal of Freedom .
Here ’ s why they need to calm down… The Presidential Medal of Freedom was established by President John F. Kennedy in 1963 and was meant to “ recognize any person who has made an especially meritorious contribution to ( 1 ) the security or national interests of the United States , or ( 2 ) world peace , or ( 3 ) cultural or other significant public or private endeavors.
” So , basically , it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just about anything .
Determining recipients is the sole discretion of the executive branch and the President has broad discretion to select individuals to receive it .
Sometimes , the award is used for political reasons , to gain positive media attention , reward supporters , or establish their legacy .
President Obama holds the record for the highest number of recipients awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom during his administration with 115 individuals .
Presidents Reagan and Clinton are tied at second with 86 individuals during their respective eight years in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ W. Bush with 81 recipients .
President Trump selected Rush Limbaugh to receive the award soon after the man with the “ talent on loan from God ” announced from his golden microphone that he was diagnosed with Stage 4 lung cancer .
Rush is as beloved on the right as much as he is reviled on the left .
So , naturally , there were both cheers and jeers at the move .
Limbaugh is an individual who is well-deserving of the honor .
Not only did he invent the conservative talk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ half of his brain tied behind his back .
He is intelligent , entertaining , engaging , and very funny .
Limbaugh ’ s real-time reaction to news paved the way for conservative content creators , bloggers , and podcasters to push back against the monopolistic Media ( D ) and get their message out .
Every person involved in conservative media owes a debt of gratitude to Rush .
Limbaugh didn ’ t just carve out a lane for conservative media , he used his significant platform to raise millions of dollars @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has raised money for the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society ; the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation ; and most recently , the Stephen Stiller Tunnels to Towers Foundation .
That ’ s why many conservatives watched this moment with tears in their eyes : But , they left insists that Rush is a hatemonger and responded in the most atrocious manner .
AOC said that Rush is a “ racist ” and the President choosing to give him the Presidential Medal of Freedom “ cheapens ” the award .
Former Vice President Joe Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ belittled ” and “ divided ” people .
Bitter Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said she initially thought that the President was going to honor civil rights icon and Congressman John Lewis ( D-GA ) who also recently announced that he was suffering from Stage 4 cancer .
She was also upset that the President chose to give Limbaugh the award in a joint session of Congress during the State of the Union address rather than in a special ceremony a the White House .
But , as mentioned earlier , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discretion , not the Speaker of the House .
Besides , some of Obama ’ s numerous Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients have not done near as much as Rush Limbaugh has to make America a better place .
The archives of the Obama White House lists the individuals that President Obama gave the award to .
Among them are Robert DeNiro , Oprah Winfrey , Barbara Streisand , Tom Hanks , Bill and Melinda Gates — all who have voiced opposition to President Trump and , in some cases , Republicans in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Barry also awarded impeached former President “ Slick Willy ” Clinton the Presidential Medal of Freedom .
Can you think of a more controversial and partisan pick than this ?
I can ’ t .
By the way , and President Trump wasn ’ t the first one to surprise someone with the Presidential Medal of Freedom .
Remember when Barry surprised Sleepy Joe with the award ?
Perhaps everyone can just calm down a bit and recognize that this particular award , more than any other , is at least somewhat subject @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who awards it and just leave it at that .

The left is still freaking out that right-wing talk show legend Rush Limbaugh was given the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Here’s why they need to calm down…
The Presidential Medal of Freedom was established by President John F. Kennedy in 1963 and was meant to “recognize any person who has made an especially meritorious contribution to (1) the security or national interests of the United States, or (2) world peace, or (3) cultural or other significant public or private endeavors.”
So, basically, it’s an honor that can be given for just about anything. Determining recipients is the sole discretion of the executive branch and the President has broad discretion to select individuals to receive it. Sometimes, the award is used for political reasons, to gain positive media attention, reward supporters, or establish their legacy.
President Obama holds the record for the highest number of recipients awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom during his administration with 115 individuals. Presidents Reagan and Clinton are tied at second with 86 individuals during their respective eight years in the White House, followed closely by George W. Bush with 81 recipients.
President Trump selected Rush Limbaugh to receive the award soon after the man with the “talent on loan from God” announced from his golden microphone that he was diagnosed with Stage 4 lung cancer.
Rush is as beloved on the right as much as he is reviled on the left. So, naturally, there were both cheers and jeers at the move.
Limbaugh is an individual who is well-deserving of the honor. Not only did he invent the conservative talk radio template, he did it with half of his brain tied behind his back. He is intelligent, entertaining, engaging, and very funny. Limbaugh’s real-time reaction to news paved the way for conservative content creators, bloggers, and podcasters to push back against the monopolistic Media(D) and get their message out. Every person involved in conservative media owes a debt of gratitude to Rush.
Limbaugh didn’t just carve out a lane for conservative media, he used his significant platform to raise millions of dollars for worthy causes — for years he has raised money for the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society; the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation; and most recently, the Stephen Stiller Tunnels to Towers Foundation.
That’s why many conservatives watched this moment with tears in their eyes:
ICYMI: Rush Limbaugh's priceless reaction to President Trump awarding him the Medal of Freedom during the State of the Union address. pic.twitter.com/5H79ZNarRF — MRCTV.org (@mrctv) February 9, 2020
But, they left insists that Rush is a hatemonger and responded in the most atrocious manner.
AOC said that Rush is a “racist” and the President choosing to give him the Presidential Medal of Freedom “cheapens” the award. Former Vice President Joe Biden also slammed Rush saying that he “belittled” and “divided” people. Bitter Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said she initially thought that the President was going to honor civil rights icon and Congressman John Lewis(D-GA) who also recently announced that he was suffering from Stage 4 cancer. She was also upset that the President chose to give Limbaugh the award in a joint session of Congress during the State of the Union address rather than in a special ceremony a the White House.
But, as mentioned earlier, the award is at the President’s discretion, not the Speaker of the House.
Besides, some of Obama’s numerous Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients have not done near as much as Rush Limbaugh has to make America a better place.
The archives of the Obama White House lists the individuals that President Obama gave the award to. Among them are Robert DeNiro, Oprah Winfrey, Barbara Streisand, Tom Hanks, Bill and Melinda Gates — all who have voiced opposition to President Trump and, in some cases, Republicans in general.
“i cAnT bElIeVe rUsH lImBaUgH gOt a mEdAl oF fREeDoM” pic.twitter.com/JM8GeMPQEO — Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) February 9, 2020
Don’t forget that Barry also awarded impeached former President “Slick Willy” Clinton the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Can you think of a more controversial and partisan pick than this? I can’t.
By the way, and President Trump wasn’t the first one to surprise someone with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Remember when Barry surprised Sleepy Joe with the award?
Perhaps everyone can just calm down a bit and recognize that this particular award, more than any other, is at least somewhat subject to the political leanings of the President who awards it and just leave it at that.


clashdaily--2020-02-10--WTF? Joaquin Phoenix Rants About Cows’ Milk In Oscar Acceptance Speech

Was Joaquin Phoenix still in character when he was making his acceptance speech for his role as the Joker or was something else going on ?
Joaquin Phoenix is an odd guy .
He ’ s a genius at his craft , but let ’ s face it — he is one of those typical weird artists .
Perhaps it ’ s just being the creative type that he is , or maybe it ’ s that he was raised by hippies .
Who knows .
Phoenix has been one of those quiet Hollywood stars who mostly keeps to himself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Lately , however , he ’ s been more politically outspoken , and his politics — like so many of his colleagues — are decidedly on the left .
He flew to Washington D.C. after he won the Golden Globe for his role as The Joker to join “ Hanoi Jane ” Fonda in her climate change protest , Fire Drill Fridays .
Phoenix then encouraged people to “ change their diet ” and go vegan as he has done in order to save the planet because the meat and dairy industry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been vegan practically his entire life , however .
At the Bafta awards , during that acceptance speech , he spoke about the “ systemic racism ” in the movie industry and that there is “ a clear message to people of color that you ’ re not welcome here ” and that made him conflicted .
But , he saved his most bizarre rant for the Academy Awards .
The outspoken member of PETA spoke about the dairy industry and the way that we treat cows to use their milk for human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even in his criticism is a result of ignorance .
Today , a spokesman for the National Milk Producers Federation responded to Phoenix ’ s statement .
To far too many animal rights activists , more concern is given to the health and welfare of animals than to people , especially those in poverty .
Animal milk is one of those things that can help people survive when resources are scarce .
It is interesting that Joaquin Phoenix is committed to using his voice to advocate for the voiceless and fight against injustice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cows , but he would never make a similar argument with such compassion and conviction about human life .
Progressives can no longer define what a woman is .
Feminism insisted that a woman can not be defined by her function in society , nor her desires and goals , nor her ability to have children .
She was no longer a complement to a man , or any different from what a man is , but had to adopt masculine traits and goals in order to have value .
For a progressive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she has a college degree , a career , ambition , and 401K .
Now , thanks to radical gender theorists , a woman can not even be defined by her biology .
The wokescolds have now essentially defined women out of existence by conflating feminism with toned-down masculinity .
Yet , the motherhood of a cow is sacrosanct .
The female biological function of a cow is to be honored and it would be cruel to deny a mother her calf .
And yet… Human life in the womb is disposable .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrong , but killing innocent children for convenience is just fine .
A cow can have feminine traits , and we should honor that , but that same femininity is somehow wrong in a human .

Was Joaquin Phoenix still in character when he was making his acceptance speech for his role as the Joker or was something else going on?
Joaquin Phoenix is an odd guy. He’s a genius at his craft, but let’s face it — he is one of those typical weird artists. Perhaps it’s just being the creative type that he is, or maybe it’s that he was raised by hippies. Who knows.
Phoenix has been one of those quiet Hollywood stars who mostly keeps to himself unless he is actively promoting a project. Lately, however, he’s been more politically outspoken, and his politics — like so many of his colleagues — are decidedly on the left.
He flew to Washington D.C. after he won the Golden Globe for his role as The Joker to join “Hanoi Jane” Fonda in her climate change protest, Fire Drill Fridays. Phoenix then encouraged people to “change their diet” and go vegan as he has done in order to save the planet because the meat and dairy industry contributes to climate change. Phoenix has been vegan practically his entire life, however.
At the Bafta awards, during that acceptance speech, he spoke about the “systemic racism” in the movie industry and that there is “a clear message to people of color that you’re not welcome here” and that made him conflicted.
But, he saved his most bizarre rant for the Academy Awards. The outspoken member of PETA spoke about the dairy industry and the way that we treat cows to use their milk for human consumption.
“We feel entitled to artificially inseminate a cow, and when she gives birth, we steal her baby. We take her milk that’s intended for her calf, and we put it in our coffee and our cereal. And I think we fear the idea of personal change because we think that we have to sacrifice something.”
Joaquin Phoenix is really out here at the #Oscars lecturing us about how we oppress cows for their milk pic.twitter.com/LmOmqVMXME — Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) February 10, 2020
Like many animal activists, even in his criticism is a result of ignorance.
Today, a spokesman for the National Milk Producers Federation responded to Phoenix’s statement.
“If he [Phoenix] studied the commitment of dairy farmers to animal welfare and had a fuller understanding of the contribution of dairy products to a nutritious diet, especially for children, he might have a different perception of the value that dairy contributes to global health and the importance of the dairy sector to global livelihood,” Alan Bjerga, a spokesman for the National Milk Producers Federation, told FOX Business on Monday.
Source: Fox Business
Far too many animal rights activists give more concern is to the health and welfare of animals than to people, especially people in poverty in developing countries. Animal milk is one of those things that can help people survive when resources are scarce.
It is interesting that Joaquin Phoenix is committed to using his voice to advocate for the voiceless and fight against injustice with the alleged “oppression” of cows, but he would never make a similar argument with such compassion and conviction about human life.
Progressives can no longer define what a woman is. Feminism insisted that a woman cannot be defined by her function in society, nor her desires and goals, nor her ability to have children. She was no longer a complement to a man, or any different from what a man is, but had to adopt masculine traits and goals in order to have value. For a progressive, a woman only has value when she has a college degree, a career, ambition, and 401K. Now, thanks to radical gender theorists, a woman cannot even be defined by her biology.
The wokescolds have now essentially defined women out of existence by conflating feminism with toned-down masculinity.
Yet, the motherhood of a cow is sacrosanct. The female biological function of a cow is to be honored and it would be cruel to deny a mother her calf. And yet…
Human life in the womb is disposable.
Taking a calf from a cow is wrong, but killing innocent children for convenience is just fine.
A cow can have feminine traits, and we should honor that, but a similar sort of femininity is somehow wrong in a human.
Leftist logic makes no sense.


clashdaily--2020-02-10--Pelosi Wants ‘Deceptive’ Video Of Her SOTU Speech-Ripping Censored By Social Media

Speaker Pelosi wants to Facebook and Twitter to do her bidding .
She should ’ ve thought of that before pulling her speech-tearing stunt .
At the end of President Trump ’ s epic State of the Union address last week , Speaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-CA ) stood up and tore up the copy of the speech that she was given .
Later , Pelosi said that she tore up the speech because there wasn ’ t anything true in it .
She said , “ The manifesto of mistruths presented in page after page of the address tonight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everyone who expects truth from the President and policies worthy of his office and the American people.
” So , the production team at Turning Point USA decided to make a point of what exactly Speaker Pelosi was tearing up .
They created a video clip of President Trump introducing his State of the Union guests and their inspiring stories interspersed by Speaker Pelosi tearing the speech .
It made a political point and it was incredibly effective .
It also makes Speaker Pelosi look very , very bad .
Once President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and all hell broke loose .
Democrats and the Media ( D ) — but I repeat myself — are calling it a “ doctored ” or “ selectively edited ” video , and that it was “ misinformation.
” They then called on the social media giants to remove the video permanently .
Benny Johnson of Turning Point USA responded in an opinion piece in NewsWeek .
Yet , Pelosi has demanded that this factual video be removed from the internet after President Trump retweeted it .
She dispatched members of her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” “ misinformation ” and “ selectively edited.
” The compliant establishment media have taken Pelosi ’ s talking points and repeated them in headlines… ….Thankfully , no platform has given in to the totalitarian request to rip down the video simply on the grounds that it makes a member of the ruling-class look bad .
The irony here is that if social networks were to comply with Pelosi ’ s authoritarianism , they would be ushering in the death of media as we know it .
Taking footage of things that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a timeline is quite literally how you create all nightly news packages , sports highlight reels , documentaries and instant replays .
The precedent set here would be horrifying .
Speaker Pelosi ’ s Deputy Chief of Staff posted a tweet saying that the video was “ fake ” and “ designed to mislead and lie to the American people.
” Andy Stone from Facebook Communications ( who used to work for Barbara Boxer and the DCCC , ) responded by asking , “ Sorry , are you suggesting the President didn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Speaker didn ’ t rip the speech ?
” Johnson also took to Twitter to explain why Pelosi ’ s failed attempt at censorship is so atrocious .
Johnson sums up the crux of the issue well in his article .
It ’ s the duplicitousness that should be condemned here .
So it is here : Pelosi and her foot soldiers in Congress feign outrage and call President Trump an authoritarian , when in reality it is they who can not resist the tyrannical impulse to control , censor and silence .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Instead of burning books , they ’ re banning videos .
Thankfully , we live in America where we have a right and a duty to hold the powerful accountable .
We must protect that .
Speaker Pelosi who has come down on due process , the presumption of innocence , the right to face your accuser , the legitimacy of the Senate vote acquitting the president of impeachable offenses , and wants the heavy hand of government to crack down on a video that makes her look bad is the one calling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve said it a million times , but if these folks didn ’ t have double-standards , they wouldn ’ t have standards at all .

Speaker Pelosi wants to Facebook and Twitter to do her bidding. She should’ve thought of that before pulling her speech-tearing stunt.
At the end of President Trump’s epic State of the Union address last week, Speaker Nancy Pelosi(D-CA) stood up and tore up the copy of the speech that she was given. Later, Pelosi said that she tore up the speech because there wasn’t anything true in it. She said, “The manifesto of mistruths presented in page after page of the address tonight should be a call to action for everyone who expects truth from the President and policies worthy of his office and the American people.”
So, the production team at Turning Point USA decided to make a point of what exactly Speaker Pelosi was tearing up. They created a video clip of President Trump introducing his State of the Union guests and their inspiring stories interspersed by Speaker Pelosi tearing the speech. It made a political point and it was incredibly effective. It also makes Speaker Pelosi look very, very bad.
Once President Trump posted the video to his Twitter account and all hell broke loose.
Democrats and the Media(D) — but I repeat myself — are calling it a “doctored” or “selectively edited” video, and that it was “misinformation.” They then called on the social media giants to remove the video permanently.
Benny Johnson of Turning Point USA responded in an opinion piece in NewsWeek.
Yet, Pelosi has demanded that this factual video be removed from the internet after President Trump retweeted it. She dispatched members of her caucus to call the video “doctored,” “misinformation” and “selectively edited.” The compliant establishment media have taken Pelosi’s talking points and repeated them in headlines… ….Thankfully, no platform has given in to the totalitarian request to rip down the video simply on the grounds that it makes a member of the ruling-class look bad. The irony here is that if social networks were to comply with Pelosi’s authoritarianism, they would be ushering in the death of media as we know it. Taking footage of things that happened, and placing that footage together in a timeline is quite literally how you create all nightly news packages, sports highlight reels, documentaries and instant replays. The precedent set here would be horrifying.
Speaker Pelosi’s Deputy Chief of Staff posted a tweet saying that the video was “fake” and “designed to mislead and lie to the American people.” Andy Stone from Facebook Communications (who used to work for Barbara Boxer and the DCCC,) responded by asking, “Sorry, are you suggesting the President didn’t make those remarks and the Speaker didn’t rip the speech?”
Sorry, are you suggesting the President didn't make those remarks and the Speaker didn't rip the speech? — Andy Stone (@andymstone) February 7, 2020
Johnson also took to Twitter to explain why Pelosi’s failed attempt at censorship is so atrocious.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is using her full political power to rip down and ban – permanently – a video from the internet purely on the grounds that it makes her look bad. That's it. If she succeeds it will be the death of media as we know it. — Benny (@bennyjohnson) February 9, 2020
Would you call a Super Bowl highlight reel "doctored," because the footage of the big play did not show every play before and after in chronological sequence? Is a news segment "misinformation" when a reporter clips a small part of a politician's speech and runs it?
No. Absurd — Benny (@bennyjohnson) February 9, 2020
Pelosi's true motivation here has nothing to do with truth. It's far more sinister and it deserves to be called out. The reason she is using her formidable powers to get this video deleted from the internet is because it makes her look bad, plain and simple. — Benny (@bennyjohnson) February 9, 2020
There is a silver lining to Pelosi's failed censorship play. Since calling for our video to be taken down, views of the video have skyrocketed. Our video of Pelosi's disrespectful behavior at the State of the Union now has over 20 million views across platforms and growing. — Benny (@bennyjohnson) February 9, 2020
Johnson sums up the crux of the issue well in his article. It’s the duplicitousness that should be condemned here.
So it is here: Pelosi and her foot soldiers in Congress feign outrage and call President Trump an authoritarian, when in reality it is they who cannot resist the tyrannical impulse to control, censor and silence. But this is the digital age. Instead of burning books, they’re banning videos. Thankfully, we live in America where we have a right and a duty to hold the powerful accountable. We must protect that. Source: NewsWeek
Speaker Pelosi who has come down on due process, the presumption of innocence, the right to face your accuser, the legitimacy of the Senate vote acquitting the president of impeachable offenses, and wants the heavy hand of government to crack down on a video that makes her look bad is the one calling President Trump an authoritarian.
We’ve said it a million times, but if these folks didn’t have double-standards, they wouldn’t have standards at all.


clashdaily--2020-02-10--EXPOSED: A Threat Bigger Than Russia Is Already Corrupting Our Elections (VIDEO)

Watch this then call your elected representatives and ask what they ’ re doing about it .
A new video released by the Texas Public Policy Foundation exposes how “ politiqueras ” are using their influence to interfere in elections .
In the video , elected officials , investigators , and experts explain how voter fraud is being perpetrated for profit by “ politiqueras ” — individuals using their position to influence the way someone else votes .
“ The way that we live has much to do with our fundamental right to vote , ” says Omar Escobar , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Starr counties in Texas .
“ There is a difference between a political consultant and what we now term the ‘ politiqueras.
’ A political consultant is going to talk about the imaging and the messaging ; that ’ s different than a woman at a pantry center giving pantry to individuals and insinuating that if they don ’ t vote in a particular way , that they ’ re not going to get pantry anymore.
” It ’ s more than just nudging legal voters in a preferred political direction , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absentee ballots collected and signed with no candidate selected .
Othal Brand Jr. , a former mayor of McAllen , says that he was approached by a young man who offered him 500 pre-signed blank mail-in ballots .
Brand said , “ It was fraud beyond a shadow of a doubt .
In the Valley , they joke about it.
” Private investigator Raul Cruz says that some voters are paid to go to the polls , and in one instance , certain individuals were being paid in cocaine to vote a certain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you pay the right people , you ’ re guaranteed a win in this county.
” Christian Adams , President and General Counsel of the Public Interest Legal Foundation says , “ We are finding over and over again that voter fraud is the canary in the coalmine to breakdown , to corruption , to lawlessness on a broader scale.
” The left will tell you that voter fraud isn ’ t a large-scale problem , but how many illegal votes must be cast before they see it as a problem ?
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a sacred thing in this country and should be taken seriously .
This is why the right wants to ensure that the integrity of our elections is ensured .
This is why we propose things like voter ID laws to ensure that only those who are legally eligible to vote can cast a ballot .
The left , however , just wants the win no matter the cost .
And the cost is very high — it ’ s our ability to hold free and fair elections .

Watch this then call your elected representatives and ask what they’re doing about it.
A new video released by the Texas Public Policy Foundation exposes how “politiqueras” are using their influence to interfere in elections. In the video, elected officials, investigators, and experts explain how voter fraud is being perpetrated for profit by “politiqueras” — individuals using their position to influence the way someone else votes.
“The way that we live has much to do with our fundamental right to vote,” says Omar Escobar, district attorney for Duval, Jim Hogg and Starr counties in Texas. “There is a difference between a political consultant and what we now term the ‘politiqueras.’ A political consultant is going to talk about the imaging and the messaging; that’s different than a woman at a pantry center giving pantry to individuals and insinuating that if they don’t vote in a particular way, that they’re not going to get pantry anymore.” Source: Texas Public Policy Foundation
It’s more than just nudging legal voters in a preferred political direction, though. There are also instances of absentee ballots collected and signed with no candidate selected. Othal Brand Jr., a former mayor of McAllen, says that he was approached by a young man who offered him 500 pre-signed blank mail-in ballots. Brand said, “It was fraud beyond a shadow of a doubt. In the Valley, they joke about it.”
Private investigator Raul Cruz says that some voters are paid to go to the polls, and in one instance, certain individuals were being paid in cocaine to vote a certain way. He adds that “if you pay the right people, you’re guaranteed a win in this county.”
Christian Adams, President and General Counsel of the Public Interest Legal Foundation says, “We are finding over and over again that voter fraud is the canary in the coalmine to breakdown, to corruption, to lawlessness on a broader scale.”
Watch:
The left will tell you that voter fraud isn’t a large-scale problem, but how many illegal votes must be cast before they see it as a problem?
The citizen’s right to vote is a sacred thing in this country and should be taken seriously.
This is why the right wants to ensure that the integrity of our elections is ensured. This is why we propose things like voter ID laws to ensure that only those who are legally eligible to vote can cast a ballot. The left, however, just wants the win no matter the cost. And the cost is very high — it’s our ability to hold free and fair elections.


clashdaily--2020-02-10--School Tells Student To Remove Old Glory From Truck… Student Response Is MAGA Gold! (Video)

Peyton Robinson was told by his school administrator in South Carolina that he could not display his American flag on his truck .
Apparently there were complaints by some who were ‘ triggered ’ by the sight of Old Glory being proudly displayed , and a school administrator had precisely the wrong reaction .
Instead of explaining that in America , there is no right to not be offended by things you disagree with , and that displaying his flag is a fundamental right… the school official told him to take down his flag .
In fact , they did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take it down .
They took it upon themselves to reach into his truck and do it himself .
“ I ’ d understand if it was the Confederate flag or something that might offend somebody , ” Robinson said .
“ I wouldn ’ t do that .
But an American flag – that ’ s our country ’ s flag .
I have every right to do it .
I don ’ t see a safety issue .
I mean I understand it ’ s a big flag – it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has ever complained about it being in their way or anything.
” According to Robinson , a school administrator told him to remove the flags when he got home , and not come back to school with them .
But the 18-year-old said before the school day was over on Wednesday , a school official went to Robinson ’ s parked truck , removed the bolts that secured the flags to the truck , took the flags down , and “ laid my flags down in the middle of my truck when I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WBTV “ I was pretty mad , ” he said .
“ I don ’ t see how it ’ s a problem .
Nobody has ever complained about it before.
” That didn ’ t go over well with a bunch of people .
And they did something about it .
A high school in York County has spoken out after students protested Thursday morning when a senior said he was asked to remove an American flag from his pick-up truck .
Thursday morning , several students , parents , and veterans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ across from school grounds waving flags .
“ When I hear that you can ’ t fly the American flag it makes my blood run red , and my blood is red , ” said Vietnam Veteran Michael Douglas .
— WBTV “ We ’ re just glad we got this victory today , and it just proves if you stand up for your country , you stand up for what you believe in , things get changed , ” said James Crump .
“ We fought for it , I fought for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mark Ludwig .
“ Due to the outstanding display of patriotism through peaceful demonstration , it is apparent to us that many are not happy about this policy , ” the school district posted on its website .
“ School officials have reviewed the standing policy regarding flags and have decided that an exception will be made for the American flag , as long as the size of the flag ( s ) does not create a driving hazard.
” “ We appreciate the passion and pride of all who have called or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hours .
America was founded by Patriots who led positive change in a myriad of ways , ” the district continued .
“ We believe today is a great example of peaceful demonstration leading to positive change .
This is the very process we advocate in our Social Studies classrooms and the fabric of American citizenship .
Thank you for helping us as we educate the students of our community.
” — WBTV

Peyton Robinson was told by his school administrator in South Carolina that he could not display his American flag on his truck.
Apparently there were complaints by some who were ‘triggered’ by the sight of Old Glory being proudly displayed, and a school administrator had precisely the wrong reaction.
Instead of explaining that in America, there is no right to not be offended by things you disagree with, and that displaying his flag is a fundamental right… the school official told him to take down his flag.
In fact, they did far more than just tell him to take it down. They took it upon themselves to reach into his truck and do it himself.
“I’d understand if it was the Confederate flag or something that might offend somebody,” Robinson said. “I wouldn’t do that. But an American flag – that’s our country’s flag. I have every right to do it. I don’t see a safety issue. I mean I understand it’s a big flag – it’s 4 by 6 – but nobody has ever complained about it being in their way or anything.”
According to Robinson, a school administrator told him to remove the flags when he got home, and not come back to school with them.
But the 18-year-old said before the school day was over on Wednesday, a school official went to Robinson’s parked truck, removed the bolts that secured the flags to the truck, took the flags down, and “laid my flags down in the middle of my truck when I wasn’t even there.” — WBTV
Robinson was angry.
“I was pretty mad,” he said. “I don’t see how it’s a problem. Nobody has ever complained about it before.”
That didn’t go over well with a bunch of people. And they did something about it.
A high school in York County has spoken out after students protested Thursday morning when a senior said he was asked to remove an American flag from his pick-up truck.
Thursday morning, several students, parents, and veterans protested the incident, many setting up across from school grounds waving flags.
“When I hear that you can’t fly the American flag it makes my blood run red, and my blood is red,” said Vietnam Veteran Michael Douglas. — WBTV
In other news, A school administrator told students to take down the American flags on their trucks… So they came to school the next day like this ?? pic.twitter.com/bUVeGACqCi — Your Republican Dad (@yourrepubdad) February 9, 2020
“We’re just glad we got this victory today, and it just proves if you stand up for your country, you stand up for what you believe in, things get changed,” said James Crump.
“We fought for it, I fought for it,” said Patriot Guard rider Mark Ludwig.
“Due to the outstanding display of patriotism through peaceful demonstration, it is apparent to us that many are not happy about this policy,” the school district posted on its website. “School officials have reviewed the standing policy regarding flags and have decided that an exception will be made for the American flag, as long as the size of the flag(s) does not create a driving hazard.”
“We appreciate the passion and pride of all who have called or come by YCHS over the past 24 hours. America was founded by Patriots who led positive change in a myriad of ways,” the district continued. “We believe today is a great example of peaceful demonstration leading to positive change. This is the very process we advocate in our Social Studies classrooms and the fabric of American citizenship. Thank you for helping us as we educate the students of our community.” — WBTV


clashdaily--2020-02-10--Watch: Biden Says Trump Has ‘Never Once Denounced White Supremacists’ — He’s WRONG

Joe launched his campaign using the divisive lie that President Trump called white supremacists and neo-nazis “ very fine people.
” Now he ’ s doubling-down .
In an interview this weekend with former Clinton administration communications director turned “ serious ” newsman , George Stephanopoulos , Joe Biden continues to push the false claim that President Trump has failed to condemn white supremacists .
The thing is , President Donald Trump has repeatedly condemned racism and white supremacy , but somehow , Sleepy Joe has missed that .
Of course , he ’ s not alone .
Many people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , that message gets buried in the news .
It ’ s a complete mystery how that doesn ’ t seem to get any coverage .
So , President Trump uses Twitter to get the message out that he ’ s not a fan of racism of any kind .
Even when the Media ( D ) is forced to cover it , it still gets ignored or buried .
Here are just a handful of headlines from CNBC , WaPo , and The New York Times .
Those are headlines , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only there was video evidence of President Trump in his own words denouncing and disavowing white nationalists , neo-nazis , the KKK , and David Duke for 17 years .
Oh , wait .
There is .
Oh , sure .
That ’ s 17 years of clips .
But how about since he has become President ?
During the presser in August 2017 about the conflict in Charlottesville , the comments that President Trump has made are always cut off right before he says that he condemns neo-nazis and white supremacists : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including the KKK , neo-nazis , and white supremacists .
He called racists “ repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans ” and said , “ We are a nation founded on the truth that all of us are created equal .
We are equal in the eyes of our Creator , we are equal under the law , and we are equal under our Constitution .
Those who spread violence in the name of bigotry strike at the very core of America.
” He then spoke about the tragic death of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ car when a white supremacist drove into a crowd of protesters wanting the statue of Robert E. Lee removed .
And he ’ s kept doing it .
But don ’ t expect the Left to accept that .
It would completely annihilate their narrative that Donald J. Trump is a virulent racist that needs to be defeated or he will destroy the country with his hate .
So , when you look at Biden and the Left ’ s refusal to accept the President ’ s statements denouncing racists while insisting that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the very least stoking racism — who is it that ’ s really being divisive ?
• Creepy Joe Biden Joins The Race With A Video Pushing the Charlottesville Lie • WATCH : Biden Defends ‘ Fine People ’ Hoax As Cornerstone Of His Campaign • Hey Biden : Can You Explain Why You Called These KKK Supporters ‘ Fine People ’ ?
( Video )

Joe launched his campaign using the divisive lie that President Trump called white supremacists and neo-nazis “very fine people.” Now he’s doubling-down.
In an interview this weekend with former Clinton administration communications director turned “serious” newsman, George Stephanopoulos, Joe Biden continues to push the false claim that President Trump has failed to condemn white supremacists.
Watch:
The thing is, President Donald Trump has repeatedly condemned racism and white supremacy, but somehow, Sleepy Joe has missed that.
Of course, he’s not alone. Many people have missed it. For some reason, that message gets buried in the news. It’s a complete mystery how that doesn’t seem to get any coverage.
So, President Trump uses Twitter to get the message out that he’s not a fan of racism of any kind.
The riots in Charlottesville a year ago resulted in senseless death and division. We must come together as a nation. I condemn all types of racism and acts of violence. Peace to ALL Americans! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 11, 2018
Even when the Media(D) is forced to cover it, it still gets ignored or buried.
Here are just a handful of headlines from CNBC, WaPo, and The New York Times.
Those are headlines, that’s easy to ignore. If only there was video evidence of President Trump in his own words denouncing and disavowing white nationalists, neo-nazis, the KKK, and David Duke for 17 years.
Oh, wait. There is.
Video evidence: President Trump has disavowed David Duke, white supremacy and the KKK for 17 YEARS! The mainstream media has been LYING to you all. pic.twitter.com/3wQHtPRp0I — Adrian Norman (@AdrianNormanDC) November 3, 2018
Oh, sure. That’s 17 years of clips. But how about since he has become President?
During the presser in August 2017 about the conflict in Charlottesville, the comments that President Trump has made are always cut off right before he says that he condemns neo-nazis and white supremacists:
Two days later, Trump condemned racism including the KKK, neo-nazis, and white supremacists. He called racists “repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans” and said, “We are a nation founded on the truth that all of us are created equal. We are equal in the eyes of our Creator, we are equal under the law, and we are equal under our Constitution. Those who spread violence in the name of bigotry strike at the very core of America.” He then spoke about the tragic death of Heather Heyer who was hit by a car when a white supremacist drove into a crowd of protesters wanting the statue of Robert E. Lee removed.
And he’s kept doing it.
But don’t expect the Left to accept that. It would completely annihilate their narrative that Donald J. Trump is a virulent racist that needs to be defeated or he will destroy the country with his hate.
So, when you look at Biden and the Left’s refusal to accept the President’s statements denouncing racists while insisting that Trump is a racist — or at the very least stoking racism — who is it that’s really being divisive?
Related:


clashdaily--2020-02-10--Partisan Justice? RBG Says That The Senate Is ‘Sharply Divided’ By ‘Tribal-Like Loyalties’

Really ?
It ’ s the Senate that has the problem with partisanship , is it ?
Not the House ?
It ’ s interesting that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg cites the Senate and not the House as the body that should be condemned for their partisanship .
After all , it was in the House that the articles of impeachment passed without a single Republican vote .
It ’ s all pretty rich coming from the “ Notorious RBG ” one of the furthest left Justices on the Supreme Court and one who openly criticized President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In July of 2016 , Justice Ginsburg , a famously progressive judge , said , “ He ’ s a faker .
He has no consistency about him .
He says whatever comes into his head at the moment .
He really has an ego .
… How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns ?
The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.
” She has since apologized for her comments .
She has also refused to retire despite multiple health issues in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t want to give President Trump another Supreme Court appointment .
But now , she ’ s weighing in on the destructive partisanship .
On Friday , Justice Ginsburg was receiving the World Peace & Liberty Award from the World Jurist Association and the World Law Foundation when she made the comments .
Asked about modern challenges facing the rule of law , Ginsburg cited “ a loss of the willingness to listen to people with views other than one ’ s own .
And that is facilitated by electronic means , to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you could call it one ’ s own home crowd , and to tune out other voices.
” “ I can give an example of our own legislature : The US Senate was once a model of civility and good fellowship , readiness to compromise for the good of the public , ” Ginsburg continued .
“ Today it ’ s divided sharply , but when I remember back to how it once was , I am hopeful.
” She said that the problem of incivility is due to “ the problems of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of observance of the golden rule , ‘ Do unto others , ' ” and societal intolerance .
Later , recalling her own confirmation in 1993 when the Senate voted to confirm her 96-3 , she said that there was room to return to bipartisanship .
She added , “ So I am hopeful that people of goodwill in both of our parties will say , ‘ We have had enough of dysfunction .
Let ’ s work together for the good of all of the people who compose the nation . '
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the circus the confirmation of her colleague , Justice Brett Kavanaugh had become .
And that had nothing to do with the partisanship on the right side of the political spectrum… It seems to be quite clear that Justice Ginsburg is oblivious to partisanship on one side of the political divide , or she tacitly approves of it and , like many leftists , imply that “ bipartisanship ” means that conservatives must conform to the liberal worldview .

Really? It’s the Senate that has the problem with partisanship, is it? Not the House?
It’s interesting that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg cites the Senate and not the House as the body that should be condemned for their partisanship. After all, it was in the House that the articles of impeachment passed without a single Republican vote.
It’s all pretty rich coming from the “Notorious RBG” one of the furthest left Justices on the Supreme Court and one who openly criticized President Trump just months before the previous presidential election. In July of 2016, Justice Ginsburg, a famously progressive judge, said, “He’s a faker. He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. … How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.” She has since apologized for her comments.
She has also refused to retire despite multiple health issues in the past few years because she doesn’t want to give President Trump another Supreme Court appointment.
But now, she’s weighing in on the destructive partisanship.
On Friday, Justice Ginsburg was receiving the World Peace & Liberty Award from the World Jurist Association and the World Law Foundation when she made the comments.
Asked about modern challenges facing the rule of law, Ginsburg cited “a loss of the willingness to listen to people with views other than one’s own. And that is facilitated by electronic means, to associate with only one’s — you could call it one’s own home crowd, and to tune out other voices.” “I can give an example of our own legislature: The US Senate was once a model of civility and good fellowship, readiness to compromise for the good of the public,” Ginsburg continued. “Today it’s divided sharply, but when I remember back to how it once was, I am hopeful.” Source: CNN
She said that the problem of incivility is due to “the problems of indifference, of tribal-like loyalties, lack of observance of the golden rule, ‘Do unto others,'” and societal intolerance.
Later, recalling her own confirmation in 1993 when the Senate voted to confirm her 96-3, she said that there was room to return to bipartisanship. She added, “So I am hopeful that people of goodwill in both of our parties will say, ‘We have had enough of dysfunction. Let’s work together for the good of all of the people who compose the nation.'”
She’s apparently unaware of the circus the confirmation of her colleague, Justice Brett Kavanaugh had become. And that had nothing to do with the partisanship on the right side of the political spectrum…
It seems to be quite clear that Justice Ginsburg is oblivious to partisanship on one side of the political divide, or she tacitly approves of it and, like many leftists, imply that “bipartisanship” means that conservatives must conform to the liberal worldview.


clashdaily--2020-02-10--State Gun Control Laws

State Gun Control Laws

So far this year , various state legislatures are pushing bills that would severely jeopardize the Second Amendment rights of their respective citizens .
Virginia , where anti-gun presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg helped Democrats take control of the General Assembly , has become the focal point of several anti-gun measures .
Prior to a gun rights rally in Richmond last month , the General Assembly passed a gun ban on the State Capitol Grounds for the duration of the 2020 Legislative Session .
Thus , no one would be allowed to carry firearms in that vicinity , even if he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Other bills that are being pushed through the Virginia General Assembly consist of a one-gun-a-month bill ( which limits citizens to the purchase of just one handgun each month ) , the creation of gun-free zones ( in which local governments would be allowed to ban guns in and around public buildings and parks ) , the prohibition of the sale or transfer of guns between private citizens without first paying a fee and obtaining a permit , the reversal of Virginia ’ s reciprocity laws ( in which Virginia would no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other states ) , a ban on semi-automatic firearms , suppressors , and standard capacity magazines , penalizing gun owners who don ’ t report lost or stolen firearms within 24 hours of discovering them missing , the restriction of parental decisions regarding firearms in the home , and the establishment of “ Red Flag ” gun confiscation orders ( which would allow the authorities to seize a citizen ’ s firearms if they felt that individual posed a threat to themselves or to other individuals ex parte , i.e .
law enforcement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hearing without the individual in question not being present ) .
Of all these bills , the “ Red Flag ” legislation is most disturbing , since it is a violation of due process .
And how is it determined if an individual poses a threat to themselves or others just because he or she owns a firearm ?
Suppose someone who happens to own a firearm is involved in a verbal or physical altercation with someone else ( but doesn ’ t use the firearm by any means ) .
Would that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken away ?
Meanwhile , other states are contemplating “ Red Flag ” legislation ( among other gun control measures ) .
They are as follows : New Hampshire , Missouri , Minnesota , New Mexico , Nebraska , South Dakota , Utah , and Pennsylvania .
Needless to say , such bills must not become law .
And if they do become law , then they should be challenged in the courts .

So far this year, various state legislatures are pushing bills that would severely jeopardize the Second Amendment rights of their respective citizens.
Virginia, where anti-gun presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg helped Democrats take control of the General Assembly, has become the focal point of several anti-gun measures.
Prior to a gun rights rally in Richmond last month, the General Assembly passed a gun ban on the State Capitol Grounds for the duration of the 2020 Legislative Session. Thus, no one would be allowed to carry firearms in that vicinity, even if he or she had a concealed handgun permit.
Other bills that are being pushed through the Virginia General Assembly consist of a one-gun-a-month bill (which limits citizens to the purchase of just one handgun each month), the creation of gun-free zones (in which local governments would be allowed to ban guns in and around public buildings and parks), the prohibition of the sale or transfer of guns between private citizens without first paying a fee and obtaining a permit, the reversal of Virginia’s reciprocity laws (in which Virginia would no longer recognize the right-to-carry permits issued by other states), a ban on semi-automatic firearms, suppressors, and standard capacity magazines, penalizing gun owners who don’t report lost or stolen firearms within 24 hours of discovering them missing, the restriction of parental decisions regarding firearms in the home, and the establishment of “Red Flag” gun confiscation orders (which would allow the authorities to seize a citizen’s firearms if they felt that individual posed a threat to themselves or to other individuals ex parte, i.e. law enforcement seeking to confiscate firearms via a court hearing without the individual in question not being present).
Of all these bills, the “Red Flag” legislation is most disturbing, since it is a violation of due process. And how is it determined if an individual poses a threat to themselves or others just because he or she owns a firearm? Suppose someone who happens to own a firearm is involved in a verbal or physical altercation with someone else (but doesn’t use the firearm by any means). Would that individual be subject to having their guns taken away?
Meanwhile, other states are contemplating “Red Flag” legislation (among other gun control measures). They are as follows: New Hampshire, Missouri, Minnesota, New Mexico, Nebraska, South Dakota, Utah, and Pennsylvania.
Needless to say, such bills must not become law. And if they do become law, then they should be challenged in the courts.


clashdaily--2020-02-11--YIKES! Bloomberg’s Defense Of ‘Stop-And-Frisk’ Isn’t Going To Win Over Minority Voters

This approach isn ’ t going to win friends and influence people in the Democratic Party of 2020 .
Michael Bloomberg can pay as many “ micro-influencers ” as he wants to improve his image , but it won ’ t matter much if the Media ( D ) picks up this audio and runs with it .
In 2015 , Michael Bloomberg spoke at the Aspen Institute and defended his “ stop-and-Frisk ” policy which resulted in visible minorities being arrested at a disproportionately higher rate for low-level crimes like marijuana possession .
Bloomberg was unapologetic , however , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because it targeted visible minorities .
Trending : Antifa Tinkerpots Don ’ t Want Their Pics Shared – So , Let ’ s Share Them Far-N-Wide In the roughly minute-long excerpt , Bloomberg begins his argument defending stop-and-frisk by saying : “ 95 % of your murders — murderers and murder victims — fit one M.O .
You can just take the description , Xerox it and pass it out to all the cops.
” Back in 2013 , during the last year of Bloomberg ’ s administration , a federal judge ruled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy amounted to racial harassment and was unconstitutional .
The NYPD had already begun to curtail the use of stop-and-frisk in the two previous years , but effectively abandoned the policy after the decision , while violent crime and murder rates have continued to fall in the years since then .
In the lead-up to announcing his 2020 run , Bloomberg made a public appearance at an African-American megachurch in Brooklyn , where he apologized for his role in championing stop-and-frisk .
But his mea culpa rang hollow for many in the black @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he continues to reflexively defend the policy .
In the audio , Bloomberg said , “ Yes , that ’ s true .
Why ?
Because we put all the cops in minority neighborhoods .
Why did we do it ?
Because that ’ s where all the crime is .
The way you get the guns out of the kids ’ hands is to throw them up against the walls and frisk them.
” The audio was released by podcaster , Benjamin Dixon .
Bloomberg had successfully squashed video of his appearance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but hadn ’ t managed to stop the audio from being leaked .
Yikes !
In that audio clip , it seems that the former Mayor of New York is quick to rely on stereotypes .
Well , Dear Readers , what do you think of this development ?
Will leftists overlook this , or will it be a real blow to Bloomberg ’ s campaign ?
• Bloomberg Pays ‘ Influencers ’ To Make Him Seem Cool As Campaign Produces Awful Memes • Bloomberg Ad Uses Obama-Era Children In Cages Photo To @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dems Call Out Bloomberg On Using Prison Labor To Make 2020 Campaign Calls ?
• Will Bloomberg ’ s Past Accusers And Lawsuits Come Back To Haunt Him ?

This approach isn’t going to win friends and influence people in the Democratic Party of 2020.
Michael Bloomberg can pay as many “micro-influencers” as he wants to improve his image, but it won’t matter much if the Media(D) picks up this audio and runs with it.
In 2015, Michael Bloomberg spoke at the Aspen Institute and defended his “stop-and-Frisk” policy which resulted in visible minorities being arrested at a disproportionately higher rate for low-level crimes like marijuana possession.
Bloomberg was unapologetic, however, insisting that his Stop-and-Frisk program was successful implying that the reason was that it targeted visible minorities.
In the roughly minute-long excerpt, Bloomberg begins his argument defending stop-and-frisk by saying: “95% of your murders — murderers and murder victims — fit one M.O. You can just take the description, Xerox it and pass it out to all the cops.” Back in 2013, during the last year of Bloomberg’s administration, a federal judge ruled that New York City’s stop-and-frisk policy amounted to racial harassment and was unconstitutional. The NYPD had already begun to curtail the use of stop-and-frisk in the two previous years, but effectively abandoned the policy after the decision, while violent crime and murder rates have continued to fall in the years since then. In the lead-up to announcing his 2020 run, Bloomberg made a public appearance at an African-American megachurch in Brooklyn, where he apologized for his role in championing stop-and-frisk. But his mea culpa rang hollow for many in the black community and, despite that statement, he continues to reflexively defend the policy. Source: Mediaite
In the audio, Bloomberg said, “Yes, that’s true. Why? Because we put all the cops in minority neighborhoods. Why did we do it? Because that’s where all the crime is. The way you get the guns out of the kids’ hands is to throw them up against the walls and frisk them.”
The audio was released by podcaster, Benjamin Dixon. Bloomberg had successfully squashed video of his appearance at the Aspen Institute back in 2015 but hadn’t managed to stop the audio from being leaked.
And it’s no wonder he tried to keep it under wraps.
Appearing before nearly 400 people in Aspen on Feb. 5, the billionaire founder of Bloomberg L.P. argued that in order to save lives, police should seize guns from male minorities between ages 15 and 25. “These kids think they’re going to get killed anyway because all their friends are getting killed,” Bloomberg said during the speech. “So they just don’t have any longterm focus or anything. It’s a joke to have a gun. It’s a joke to pull a trigger.” National media outlets latched onto that portion of the discussion, in which Bloomberg said one method to deal with the issue is to “throw them up against the wall and frisk them,” referring to the controversial stop-and-frisk tactics New York City implemented during Bloomberg’s tenure. Source: Aspen Times
Listen:
Audio of @MikeBloomberg’s 2015 @AspenInstitute speech where he explains that “you can just Xerox (copy)” the description of male, minorities 16-25 and hand to cops. Bloomberg had video of speech blocked. Perhaps because of the problematic explanation he gives for #StopAndFrisk pic.twitter.com/Fm0YCi4ZRy — Benjamin Dixon (@BenjaminPDixon) February 10, 2020
Yikes! In that audio clip, it seems that the former Mayor of New York is quick to rely on stereotypes and wants to use a heavy-handed approach to crime instead of the “progressive” view of finding the “root causes” of crime in particular communities.
Well, Dear Readers, what do you think of this development?
Will leftists overlook this, or will it be a real blow to Bloomberg’s campaign?
Do You Think That This Audio Will Hurt Bloomberg In The Primaries? Do You Think That This Audio Will Hurt Bloomberg In The Primaries? * Yes No
Enter your email to see the poll results: *
Related:


clashdaily--2020-02-11--Dems Will Dis Trump For His Runaway Spending… Here’s Why They’re Wrong

Even some of Trump ’ s defenders have dismissed our bloated budget as being something that was less urgent in his scope of priorities .
It ’ s entirely correct to say that DC has refused to put the brakes in any serious way on our unsustainable spending .
But we ’ d be wrong to lay that at Trump ’ s feet , says David Horowitz .
It ’ s become a perennial joke .
Every year in February , Trump ’ s Office of Management and Budget ( OMB ) introduces an ambitious budget proposal to slash spending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the end of the year , not only is every principle of that proposal jettisoned in the actual budget signed by the president , but the new budget increases spending for every program that he promised to cut .
…The typical response I ’ ve heard from some colleagues is , “ Well , Trump was never going to be a limited government president.
” However , that is simply not true , as we see from his willingness to sign on to conservative budgets every year , more conservative than any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the president was never going to make changes to Social Security and Medicare , but everything else – from Medicaid and welfare to foreign aid and domestic non-defense discretionary spending – was all fair game .
Trending : Antifa Tinkerpots Don ’ t Want Their Pics Shared – So , Let ’ s Share Them Far-N-Wide Unfortunately , unfocused conservatives have allowed Democrats to work with the ineffective GOP leaders in Congress to increase spending to record levels that blow out the shocking levels of the Obama era .
Annual spending by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is now up to $ 83 billion , 24 percent higher ( in non-inflation-adjusted dollars ) than during Obama ’ s spendathon in 2009 .
With a booming job market and record revenue , spending and deficits are blowing out the levels accrued during the deepest recession in generations .
But again , today ’ s budget release demonstrates that it doesn ’ t have to be this way .
Trump will sign a bad budget if the swamp consensus coalesces around it .
But at the same time , if conservatives work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ administration pushing for spending cuts the president is clearly OK with , he would sign a good budget as well .
In light of the recent increase in spending on foreign aid , the budget proposal cuts 21 percent from the State Department and international assistance programs .
The EPA would be cut by 27 percent and energy subsidies by 29 percent .
Overall , the budget envisions $ 2.4 trillion in 10-year cuts to discretionary spending and war spending from the baseline forecast and another $ 2 trillion in reductions from “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ food stamps and Medicaid .
What is the solution ?
Politicians only make the hard choices that they are compelled to make .
If they don ’ t hear from their constituents that this is a priority ; if they aren ’ t given updates of the debt clock and reminded that every dollar spent by them commits the labor of our children and grandchildren to carry that cost ; if they don ’ t get regular reminders from us that a lean government has fewer ways to become corrupt and tyrannical over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will have little incentive to fight against the inertia and interests of those whose palms are greased , and whose fiefdoms are created by this same bloated spending .
Of course these minor power centers won ’ t go down without a fight .
Which is why they need to go down in the first place .

Even some of Trump’s defenders have dismissed our bloated budget as being something that was less urgent in his scope of priorities.
It’s entirely correct to say that DC has refused to put the brakes in any serious way on our unsustainable spending. But we’d be wrong to lay that at Trump’s feet, says David Horowitz.
It’s become a perennial joke. Every year in February, Trump’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) introduces an ambitious budget proposal to slash spending and abolish wasteful programs. Then, by the end of the year, not only is every principle of that proposal jettisoned in the actual budget signed by the president, but the new budget increases spending for every program that he promised to cut.
…The typical response I’ve heard from some colleagues is, “Well, Trump was never going to be a limited government president.” However, that is simply not true, as we see from his willingness to sign on to conservative budgets every year, more conservative than any president in modern history. Sure, the president was never going to make changes to Social Security and Medicare, but everything else – from Medicaid and welfare to foreign aid and domestic non-defense discretionary spending – was all fair game.
Unfortunately, unfocused conservatives have allowed Democrats to work with the ineffective GOP leaders in Congress to increase spending to record levels that blow out the shocking levels of the Obama era. Annual spending by the Department of Education, for example, is now up to $83 billion, 24 percent higher (in non-inflation-adjusted dollars) than during Obama’s spendathon in 2009. With a booming job market and record revenue, spending and deficits are blowing out the levels accrued during the deepest recession in generations.
But again, today’s budget release demonstrates that it doesn’t have to be this way. Trump will sign a bad budget if the swamp consensus coalesces around it. But at the same time, if conservatives work to back the non-swamp elements of the administration pushing for spending cuts the president is clearly OK with, he would sign a good budget as well.
In light of the recent increase in spending on foreign aid, the budget proposal cuts 21 percent from the State Department and international assistance programs. The EPA would be cut by 27 percent and energy subsidies by 29 percent. Overall, the budget envisions $2.4 trillion in 10-year cuts to discretionary spending and war spending from the baseline forecast and another $2 trillion in reductions from “mandatory spending” programs, such as food stamps and Medicaid.
What is the solution?
We are.
Politicians only make the hard choices that they are compelled to make. If they don’t hear from their constituents that this is a priority; if they aren’t given updates of the debt clock and reminded that every dollar spent by them commits the labor of our children and grandchildren to carry that cost; if they don’t get regular reminders from us that a lean government has fewer ways to become corrupt and tyrannical over the citizens it supposedly serves, they will have little incentive to fight against the inertia and interests of those whose palms are greased, and whose fiefdoms are created by this same bloated spending.
Of course these minor power centers won’t go down without a fight.
Which is why they need to go down in the first place.


clashdaily--2020-02-11--Chris Pratt Launches Pledge Of Allegiance-Inspired Production Company (Video)

The A-list actor says that he wants to bring unity to a divided country .
This may very well be the most Chris Pratt thing ever .
In an Instagram post , the Guardians of the Galaxy star took fans on a tour of his new office for his production company , Indivisible .
Pratt says that the name just hit him when he heard the Pledge of Allegiance at his son ’ s Cub Scout meeting .
He tweeted , “ It ’ s the perfect name for a company intent on creating content which aims to sew the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Antifa Tinkerpots Don ’ t Want Their Pics Shared – So , Let ’ s Share Them Far-N-Wide Pratt , using his cellphone captured a video of the office containing memorabilia from his roles going back to his television days on the CW series Everwood from 2002-2006 and NBC ’ s Parks & Recreation from 2009-2015 .
It also includes items from The Lego Movie , Guardians of the Galaxy , and Jurassic Park film franchises .
A musical sneak peak at the walls inside my office , ’ he wrote , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ each step of this wonderful journey.
’ The actor , who has a seven-year-old son named Jack from his past marriage to Anna Faris , continued : I ’ ve started a company .
Indivisible Productions … One nation … Under God … Indivisible.
’ The leading man , who plays Peter Quill/Star-Lord in the Marvel Cinematic Universe , said the mission statement of his new company was ‘ to create entertaining content , focusing on themes which will help to bridge the growing divide in our country and world .
‘ You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place .
No biggie , you ’ re welcome , but it ’ s whatever.
’ Pratt also announced that he is hoping to return to the small screen starring in The Terminal List , a drama series that is an adaptation of Jack Carr ’ s 2018 book The Terminal List : A Thriller .
According to The Hollywood Reporter , Pratt is teaming up with his Magnificent Seven director , Antoine Fuqua to direct the conspiracy thriller ’ s pilot .
The series hasn ’ t yet been picked up by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s being shopped around to “ prestige outlets , premium cable networks , and streaming services.
” If it is picked up , The Terminal List is expected to be a multiple-season project rather than a limited series event .
With an A-lister like Pratt and a great director , it ’ s likely that the series will be picked up .
The Terminal List follows Reece ( Pratt ) after his entire platoon of Navy SEALs is ambushed during a high-stakes covert mission .
As he returns home with conflicting memories of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new evidence comes to light when he discovers dark forces working against him .
The drama is based on the Jack Carr novel of the same name , which Pratt and Fuqua brought to MRC Television , which will serve as the studio behind the project and shop the package to potential buyers .
Chris Pratt loves God and his country , and that ’ s precisely why he is so beloved by so many patriots .
• CHRIS PRATT : Liberals Will Hate This Video of Pratt Teaching THIS to His Son @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In Front Of Vapid Hollywood Clowns • TV Guide Goes After Hollywood A-Lister , Chris Pratt , For HUNTING And Loving God • What ’ s REALLY Behind The Alleged ‘ Uproar ’ Over Chris Pratt ’ s ‘ Offensive ’ Shirt ?

The A-list actor says that he wants to bring unity to a divided country.
This may very well be the most Chris Pratt thing ever.
In an Instagram post, the Guardians of the Galaxy star took fans on a tour of his new office for his production company, Indivisible. Pratt says that the name just hit him when he heard the Pledge of Allegiance at his son’s Cub Scout meeting. He tweeted, “It’s the perfect name for a company intent on creating content which aims to sew the growing divide in this country.”
Hearing the pledge of allegiance at my kid’s cub scout meeting the name hit me. INDIVISIBLE “One nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” It’s the perfect name for a company intent on creating content which aims to sew the growing divide in this country. https://t.co/AA9HkuX3YS — chris pratt (@prattprattpratt) February 6, 2020
Pratt, using his cellphone captured a video of the office containing memorabilia from his roles going back to his television days on the CW series Everwood from 2002-2006 and NBC’s Parks & Recreation from 2009-2015. It also includes items from The Lego Movie, Guardians of the Galaxy, and Jurassic Park film franchises.
A musical sneak peak at the walls inside my office,’ he wrote, adding he was ‘so grateful for each step of this wonderful journey.’ The actor, who has a seven-year-old son named Jack from his past marriage to Anna Faris, continued: I’ve started a company. Indivisible Productions … One nation … Under God … Indivisible.’ The leading man, who plays Peter Quill/Star-Lord in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, said the mission statement of his new company was ‘to create entertaining content, focusing on themes which will help to bridge the growing divide in our country and world. ‘You know, make the world a better place. No biggie, you’re welcome, but it’s whatever.’ Source: Daily Mail
Pratt also announced that he is hoping to return to the small screen starring in The Terminal List, a drama series that is an adaptation of Jack Carr’s 2018 book The Terminal List: A Thriller.
According to The Hollywood Reporter, Pratt is teaming up with his Magnificent Seven director, Antoine Fuqua to direct the conspiracy thriller’s pilot.
The series hasn’t yet been picked up by a studio yet, but it’s being shopped around to “prestige outlets, premium cable networks, and streaming services.” If it is picked up, The Terminal List is expected to be a multiple-season project rather than a limited series event.
With an A-lister like Pratt and a great director, it’s likely that the series will be picked up.
The Terminal List follows Reece (Pratt) after his entire platoon of Navy SEALs is ambushed during a high-stakes covert mission. As he returns home with conflicting memories of the event and questions about culpability, new evidence comes to light when he discovers dark forces working against him. The drama is based on the Jack Carr novel of the same name, which Pratt and Fuqua brought to MRC Television, which will serve as the studio behind the project and shop the package to potential buyers. Source: The Hollywood Reporter
It all sounds pretty awesome.
Chris Pratt loves God and his country, and that’s precisely why he is so beloved by so many patriots.
Related:


clashdaily--2020-02-11--AWKWARD! Buttigieg Accidentally Calls ‘Dark Money’ In Politics ‘Black Money’ To A Room Full Of Afric

AWKWARD! Buttigieg Accidentally Calls ‘Dark Money’ In Politics ‘Black Money’ To A Room Full Of African-Americans

How do you recognize when a candidate is pandering ?
When he defaults to the official talking points , even when he ’ s talking about something totally unrelated .
Preachy Pete has a problem , and he knows it .
Black voters haven ’ t bought in on his message .
Some have pointed to his record as mayor to explicitly call him out as a bigot .
For somebody wanting to lead a party whose rise and fall absolutely depends on how many black voters show up to rubberstamp their usual Democrat candidate , that ’ s a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t Want Their Pics Shared – So , Let ’ s Share Them Far-N-Wide So Preachy Pete has done what so many other Democrats have taken to doing .
He ’ s pandering .
Aids Research ( which Trump has already committed to ) … So when the topic of campaign funding came up , guess what happened ?
He made a pretty significant Freudian slip .
In front of a black audience .
He meant to say ‘ dark money ’ but he botched it .
And instead of just fixing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ potential soundbite , he tried to fix it .
He has obviously forgotten the first rule about holes… if you ’ re standing in one , stop digging .
Pretty sure you made it worse and not better , there , Preachy Pete .

How do you recognize when a candidate is pandering? When he defaults to the official talking points, even when he’s talking about something totally unrelated.
Preachy Pete has a problem, and he knows it.
Black voters haven’t bought in on his message. Some have pointed to his record as mayor to explicitly call him out as a bigot.
For somebody wanting to lead a party whose rise and fall absolutely depends on how many black voters show up to rubberstamp their usual Democrat candidate, that’s a problem.
So Preachy Pete has done what so many other Democrats have taken to doing. He’s pandering.
For example:
The Oscars…
There is no shortage of stories about people of color to be told and no shortage of talented people of color to tell them. It’s time for Hollywood to raise its standards and remove the barriers that have allowed talent to go undiscovered and uncelebrated for generations. https://t.co/1TeDQDvLMD — Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) February 9, 2020
Trayvon’s birthday…
Trayvon Martin would have been 25 today. How many 25th birthdays have been stolen from us by white supremacy, gun violence, prejudice, and fear?#BlackLivesMatter — Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) February 5, 2020
Aids Research (which Trump has already committed to)…
Your health should never be determined by who you are, what you look like, or whom you love. Yet Black Americans are disproportionately impacted by HIV/AIDS. It’s unacceptable. My White House will commit to ending the HIV/AIDS epidemic by 2030: https://t.co/JXjAlsw6vy #NBHAAD pic.twitter.com/TY0spNxiVr — Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) February 7, 2020
So when the topic of campaign funding came up, guess what happened?
He made a pretty significant Freudian slip. In front of a black audience.
He meant to say ‘dark money’ but he botched it.
And instead of just fixing the mistake, probably terrified of the potential soundbite, he tried to fix it.
Pete accidentally calls “dark money” “black money” while speaking to a room of black people. He then makes it so awkward that it physically hurt to watch this video.
pic.twitter.com/ImMvC2DE3u — Greg Price (@greg_price11) February 11, 2020
He has obviously forgotten the first rule about holes… if you’re standing in one, stop digging.
Pretty sure you made it worse and not better, there, Preachy Pete.


clashdaily--2020-02-11--WATCH: Young Woman That Biden Called A ‘Lying Dog-Faced Pony Soldier’ Responds And It’s EPIC!

Obama had Joe the Plumber , now Biden has the student he called the ‘ lying dog-faced pony soldier ’ .
When you handle your critics badly , they can really bite you in the ass .
We ’ ve already covered the story that the friendly media described as a ‘ joke ’ … when an astute 21-year old student asked Joe a pointed question at his own rally about why the natural advantage he had of being able to campaign while senators were stuck in Impeachment Proceedings didn ’ t pay off into better success in Iowa .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ with his weirdly opaque retirement-home insult that carried shades of Grandpa Simpson with it .
Trending : Antifa Tinkerpots Don ’ t Want Their Pics Shared – So , Let ’ s Share Them Far-N-Wide But the college student gets the last word on this one .
If Old Joe hadn ’ t brushed her off as a lightweight , maybe the public would never have known about her absolutely devastating assessment of his crumbling campaign .
The 21-year-old woman that Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden insulted over the weekend as being a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back at the 77-year-old , saying that his campaign does not have what it takes to win .
“ A lot of what he ’ s saying seems to be very pathos-based and very sad and we ’ ve heard a lot about deaths and cancer and people losing their jobs and to me he doesn ’ t really seem very solution oriented , ” Madison Moore told Fox News .
“ I don ’ t think he has the momentum to carry this to a national election.
” …The Post noted that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ writing , “ in reality , it is totally irrelevant whether I ’ ve been to a caucus or not .
Joe Biden has been performing incredibly poorly in this race .
His inability to answer a simple question from a nobody college student like me only exacerbates that reality.
” — Daily Wire With a political campaign struggling like his , criticism like this is pretty close to a ‘ kill shot ’ .
And down he goes .
Maybe he could have just answered the question without being a d-bag about @ @

Obama had Joe the Plumber, now Biden has the student he called the ‘lying dog-faced pony soldier’. When you handle your critics badly, they can really bite you in the ass.
We’ve already covered the story that the friendly media described as a ‘joke’ … when an astute 21-year old student asked Joe a pointed question at his own rally about why the natural advantage he had of being able to campaign while senators were stuck in Impeachment Proceedings didn’t pay off into better success in Iowa.
That’s when Biden let fly with his weirdly opaque retirement-home insult that carried shades of Grandpa Simpson with it.
But the college student gets the last word on this one.
Fox News’ @GriffJenkins spoke to the 21-year-old voter Biden called “a dog-faced pony soldier,” Madison Moore, who had this to say: "A lot of what he’s saying seems to be … very sad … I don’t think he has the momentum to carry this to a national election." pic.twitter.com/RXoofBterU — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) February 10, 2020
If Old Joe hadn’t brushed her off as a lightweight, maybe the public would never have known about her absolutely devastating assessment of his crumbling campaign.
The 21-year-old woman that Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden insulted over the weekend as being a “lying dog-faced pony soldier” fired back at the 77-year-old, saying that his campaign does not have what it takes to win.
“A lot of what he’s saying seems to be very pathos-based and very sad and we’ve heard a lot about deaths and cancer and people losing their jobs and to me he doesn’t really seem very solution oriented,” Madison Moore told Fox News. “I don’t think he has the momentum to carry this to a national election.”
…The Post noted that Moore accused Biden of insulting her, writing, “in reality, it is totally irrelevant whether I’ve been to a caucus or not. Joe Biden has been performing incredibly poorly in this race. His inability to answer a simple question from a nobody college student like me only exacerbates that reality.” — Daily Wire
With a political campaign struggling like his, criticism like this is pretty close to a ‘kill shot’.
And down he goes.
Maybe he could have just answered the question without being a d-bag about it?
Too late now.


clashdaily--2020-02-11--WATCH: Biden Supporters Create Their Own Cringeworthy ‘Tribute’ Song

Whoever it is that keeps churning out these sad rehashes of old songs for political purposes desperately needs an intervention .
They don ’ t even pick music that plays well .
Somebody , somewhere , blew the dust off of their mom ’ s Backstreet Boys CD and discovered this ‘ classic song ’ … and their first instinct was to use it to fire up his volunteers .
If this is what ‘ fired up ’ looks like , this explains why he ’ s imploding so badly .
Trending : Antifa Tinkerpots Don ’ t Want Their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Share Them Far-N-Wide It ’ s still not as bad as Beto ’ s admirers trying to reprise YMCA to his nickname .
Now , if you MUST rewrite some dusty old song for a political use , can we at LEAST pick something with some energy ?
Just off the top of our heads , this one is the pick of the ClashDaily Newsroom because it is : a ) more lively ; and b ) a bit more appropriate considering Joe ’ s age .
Can ’ t you just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the door , crap !
he ’ s on the floor , someone help up that Biden-saur !
”

Whoever it is that keeps churning out these sad rehashes of old songs for political purposes desperately needs an intervention. They don’t even pick music that plays well.
Somebody, somewhere, blew the dust off of their mom’s Backstreet Boys CD and discovered this ‘classic song’… and their first instinct was to use it to fire up his volunteers.
If this is what ‘fired up’ looks like, this explains why he’s imploding so badly.
Watch as a chorus of Gen Zs presents a political rendition of Backstreet Boys to a Boomer. pic.twitter.com/mx23NScneH — Kate Hyde (@KateHydeNY) February 10, 2020
It’s still not as bad as Beto’s admirers trying to reprise YMCA to his nickname.
Now, if you MUST rewrite some dusty old song for a political use, can we at LEAST pick something with some energy?
Just off the top of our heads, this one is the pick of the ClashDaily Newsroom because it is: a) more lively; and b) a bit more appropriate considering Joe’s age.
Can’t you just hear the new lyrics?
“Open the door, crap! he’s on the floor, someone help up that Biden-saur!”


clashdaily--2020-02-11--Dear Greta: Data Shows That Climate-Related Deaths Are Down 99.9% Since 1932 — Now What?

What happens to Greta ’ s climate grifting if the data points don ’ t match her claims ?
We ’ ve heard the Swedish teen climate activist ’ s “ How Dare You ?
” speech at the United Nations Climate Action Summit last year where she accuses those who refuse to turn the dial back on our technology all the way to the Stone Age as heartless beats who have stolen her dreams and her childhood .
She was a bit more sedate this year , instead citing the many people that are dying due to the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ catastrophe.
” Watch as she makes her case : Trending : Antifa Tinkerpots Don ’ t Want Their Pics Shared – So , Let ’ s Share Them Far-N-Wide But data that has been released by the Cato Institute puts the brake on the 17-year old ’ s claims .
Climate hysterics like Greta continue to claim that there is technology available that can end the climate catastrophe , but we refuse to use it .
Really ?
What technology would that be ?
Solar panels ?
Windmills ?
They can ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the alarm on climate alarmism also are not fans of clean nuclear power .
But it would seem that the concern over rising CO2 emissions resulting from increased use of fossil fuels isn ’ t causing mass deaths worldwide .
In fact , it ’ s quite the opposite .
Here are a couple of striking numbers from the data : in the decade from 2004 to 2013 , worldwide climate-related deaths ( including droughts , floods , extreme temperatures , wildfires , and storms ) plummeted to a level 88.6 percent below @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 1939.2 The year 2013 , with 29,404 reported deaths , had 99.4 percent fewer climate-related deaths than the historic record year of 1932 , which had 5,073,283 reported deaths for the same category.3 That reduction occurred despite more complete reporting , an incentive to declare greater damage to gain more aid , and a massively growing population , particularly in vulnerable places like coastal areas , in recent times .
The climate catastrophists don ’ t want you to know this because it reveals how fundamentally flawed their viewpoint is .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stable and safe place we make volatile and dangerous .
In fact , the global climate system is naturally volatile and dangerous—we make it livable through development and technology—development and technology powered by the only form of cheap , reliable , scalable reliable energy that can make climate livable for 7 billion people .
Using fossil fuels actually makes some places on earth habitable .
Of course , this information is from 2014… By the end of 2018 , the number of deaths globally that were a result of climate change dropped even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 99.9 % reduction .
The Cato Institute article also states that if there was an ideal global temperature , it would be higher than the one that is pushed by climate activists .
The best response to deal with climate change is to just adapt .
Besides that , however , it is to use fossil fuels because “ the power of fossil-fueled machines to build a durable civilization highly resilient to extreme heat , extreme cold , floods , storms , and so on.
” This is good news since it looks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ mini ice age ” due to solar “ hibernation.
” Now that ’ s one heck of an Inconvenient Truth !

What happens to Greta’s climate grifting if the data points don’t match her claims?
We’ve heard the Swedish teen climate activist’s “How Dare You?” speech at the United Nations Climate Action Summit last year where she accuses those who refuse to turn the dial back on our technology all the way to the Stone Age as heartless beats who have stolen her dreams and her childhood.
She was a bit more sedate this year, instead citing the many people that are dying due to the “climate crisis” and pending “climate catastrophe.”
Watch as she makes her case:
But data that has been released by the Cato Institute puts the brake on the 17-year old’s claims.
Climate hysterics like Greta continue to claim that there is technology available that can end the climate catastrophe, but we refuse to use it. Really? What technology would that be? Solar panels? Windmills? They can’t mean nuclear, many of those sounding the alarm on climate alarmism also are not fans of clean nuclear power.
But it would seem that the concern over rising CO2 emissions resulting from increased use of fossil fuels isn’t causing mass deaths worldwide. In fact, it’s quite the opposite.
Here is a graph comparing CO 2 emissions, the alleged climate danger, to the number of climate-related deaths, which reflects actual climate danger to humans. It’s striking—as CO 2 emissions rise, climate-related deaths plunge.
Here are a couple of striking numbers from the data: in the decade from 2004 to 2013, worldwide climate-related deaths (including droughts, floods, extreme temperatures, wildfires, and storms) plummeted to a level 88.6 percent below that of the peak decade, 1930 to 1939.2 The year 2013, with 29,404 reported deaths, had 99.4 percent fewer climate-related deaths than the historic record year of 1932, which had 5,073,283 reported deaths for the same category.3 That reduction occurred despite more complete reporting, an incentive to declare greater damage to gain more aid, and a massively growing population, particularly in vulnerable places like coastal areas, in recent times. The climate catastrophists don’t want you to know this because it reveals how fundamentally flawed their viewpoint is. They treat the global climate system as a stable and safe place we make volatile and dangerous. In fact, the global climate system is naturally volatile and dangerous—we make it livable through development and technology—development and technology powered by the only form of cheap, reliable, scalable reliable energy that can make climate livable for 7 billion people. Source: Cato Institute (Emphasis Added)
Using fossil fuels actually makes some places on earth habitable.
Of course, this information is from 2014…
Hold on, there Greta! There’s more…
By the end of 2018, the number of deaths globally that were a result of climate change dropped even further to just 5,000 which is a 99.9% reduction.
The Cato Institute article also states that if there was an ideal global temperature, it would be higher than the one that is pushed by climate activists. The best response to deal with climate change is to just adapt. Besides that, however, it is to use fossil fuels because “the power of fossil-fueled machines to build a durable civilization highly resilient to extreme heat, extreme cold, floods, storms, and so on.”
This is good news since it looks like we might be headed for a “mini ice age” due to solar “hibernation.”
Now that’s one heck of an Inconvenient Truth!


clashdaily--2020-02-11--The ‘Notorious’ Trump Coffee Mugs Are Now Available!

Now you can have the Notorious DJT join you for your morning java , or even at the gym .
You remember this artwork being unveiled , don ’ t you ?
It was right around the time Conor McGregor showed the world that you can win a match by punching someone in the face with your shoulder .
Here ’ s my latest in my Trump Series .
This one is titled , ‘ The Notorious DJT.
’ Oil on canvas .
30×40″ of MAGA boom !
Guaranteed to trigger snowflakes and please patriots .
The ORIGINAL is currently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ signed and numbered , Limited Edition prints available .
Lastly , we have various sized prints , ranging in price from $ 30 to $ 1000 , that can be printed on paper , canvas or metal .
We ’ re offering 20 % off and free shipping to first time buyers .
Purchase links below .
( *Please note : your piece will not have the DG.Art watermark on it . )
Trending : Antifa Tinkerpots Don ’ t Want Their Pics Shared – So , Let ’ s Share Them Far-N-Wide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an authentic art piece on their walls , there ’ s another way you can enjoy the Rowdy & Rebellious spirit Trump embodies… on mugs , shirts or hoodies .
Here are your options :

Now you can have the Notorious DJT join you for your morning java, or even at the gym.
You remember this artwork being unveiled, don’t you?
It was right around the time Conor McGregor showed the world that you can win a match by punching someone in the face with your shoulder.
Here’s my latest in my Trump Series. This one is titled, ‘The Notorious DJT.’ Oil on canvas. 30×40″ of MAGA boom! Guaranteed to trigger snowflakes and please patriots. The ORIGINAL is currently available. We also have 100, signed and numbered, Limited Edition prints available. Lastly, we have various sized prints, ranging in price from $30 to $1000, that can be printed on paper, canvas or metal. We’re offering 20% off and free shipping to first time buyers. Purchase links below.
(*Please note: your piece will not have the DG.Art watermark on it.)
Since not everyone can commit to putting an authentic art piece on their walls, there’s another way you can enjoy the Rowdy & Rebellious spirit Trump embodies… on mugs, shirts or hoodies.
Here are your options:
Black mug 11oz – ‘The Notorious DJT’ — in black…
Mug 11oz – ‘The Notorious DJT’ — in white…
Unisex Heavy Blend™ Crewneck Sweatshirt
Unisex Ultra Cotton Tee