clashdaily--2020-04-15--Fauci Claims Jesus & The Apostle Paul Were Wrong – Here’s His Problem With Them

( Washington D.C. ) Dr. Anthony Fauci , during an interview with Whoopi Goldberg on The View , shocked evangelicals Wednesday morning when he said , “ The Bible needed to be updated .
In particular , St. Paul ’ s directives in Romans 16:16 , 1 Corinthians 16:20 , 2 Corinthians 13:12 , and 1 Thessalonians 5:26 where Paul advises The Church to ‘ Greet each other with a holy kiss . '
” Fauci said , The Apostle Paul wasn ’ t “ prescient enough ” ; he “ was against social distancing ” and didn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future pandemics like COVID19 ” .
Fauci also had serious problems with Jesus ’ example of laying hands on the sick , playing with children , mass gatherings in Temples and market places , and how he participated in large , “ germ pit ” , wedding feasts .
Interestingly enough , after the initial shock evangelicals showed on social media against Fauci , a large swath of Christendom , sided with Fauci over the scripture saying , “ Tony makes sense ” and “ the Bible is so yesterday .
We should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s note : In case CNN ’ s “ Media Watchdog ” Brian Stelter or the folks at Snopes happen to read this — or have it read TO them — we should probably explain something in words small enough to understand .
This is not real .
It is a joke .
We call it ‘ satire ’ .
Have an adult explain it to you . ]
Pussification : The Effeminization Of The American Male Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Giles , best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog , ClashDaily.com , has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity .
That is , if the man-child will put down his frappuccino ; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome .
Buy Now : Pussification : The Effeminization Of The American Male

(Washington D.C.) Dr. Anthony Fauci, during an interview with Whoopi Goldberg on The View, shocked evangelicals Wednesday morning when he said, “The Bible needed to be updated. In particular, St. Paul’s directives in Romans 16:16, 1 Corinthians 16:20, 2 Corinthians 13:12, and 1 Thessalonians 5:26 where Paul advises The Church to ‘Greet each other with a holy kiss.'” Fauci said, The Apostle Paul wasn’t “prescient enough”; he “was against social distancing” and didn’t “take into consideration the possibilities of future pandemics like COVID19”.
Fauci also had serious problems with Jesus’ example of laying hands on the sick, playing with children, mass gatherings in Temples and market places, and how he participated in large, “germ pit”, wedding feasts.
Interestingly enough, after the initial shock evangelicals showed on social media against Fauci, a large swath of Christendom, sided with Fauci over the scripture saying, “Tony makes sense” and “the Bible is so yesterday. We should listen to the experts.”
[Editor’s note: In case CNN’s “Media Watchdog” Brian Stelter or the folks at Snopes happen to read this — or have it read TO them — we should probably explain something in words small enough to understand. This is not real. It is a joke. We call it ‘satire’. Have an adult explain it to you.]
Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now: Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male


clashdaily--2020-04-15--The Democrats Rally Behind Biden–This Time It’s Elizabeth Warren Endorsing Joe

Pocahantas has endorsed Sleepy Joe for President .
The day before Super Tuesday , Joe saw Beto , Buttigieg , and Klobuchar endorse him .
Then , on March 19 , Tulsi Gabbard tossed her support behind Joe .
Another flurry of Democrats are scurrying to back the presumptive Democratic nominee .
On Monday it was Joe ’ s rival , Bernie Sanders .
Yesterday , it was Barack Obama .
Today , it ’ s Liz Warren .
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are orchestrated .
In the span of just 48 hours , Joe Biden put to rest a major question surrounding Democratic efforts to win back the White House : 2020 will not be a repeat of 2016 .
One after the other , Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders threw their support behind the former vice president — with Elizabeth Warren soon to follow , according to sources familiar with the discussions .
The rapid consolidation behind Biden offered the most powerful evidence yet of the party ’ s intent on avoiding the deadly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s victory four years ago .
Oh , that ’ s because it is orchestrated .
If you don ’ t think that it is , check out this snazzy video endorsement that Liz just managed to publish at precisely 9 am .
That old thing ?
Oh , she just had those old family photos and video clips of Joe sitting around for a while and whipped up that video with transitions , a thorough script that reflected Obama ’ s endorsement , and captioned perfectly in no time at all .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ did–his family history , including the tragedy he has suffered , his lifelong public servant status , his role leading the Recovery Act , and how the important thing that needs to happen is defeating Donald Trump .
The quick succession of endorsements so soon after Sanders dropped out of the race provided a rebuke to Trump ’ s attempts to sow discord within the party ; the president has repeatedly sought to raise doubts about Obama and Sanders ’ true allegiance to Biden .
The endorsements also underscored Biden ’ s role @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intend to hold up as a major contrast to Trump .
Obama and Sanders struck similar notes in their remarks , contrasting Trump ’ s leadership style — which they characterized as self-serving , dictatorial and dangerous — to Biden ’ s , calling him compassionate and experienced .
Biden ’ s aides pointed to the significance of the timing of the events , noting this is the earliest that a Democratic nomination has been conclusively wrapped up since 2004 .
They ’ re afraid that Trump is going to win in 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stop him .
Joe is a spectacularly terrible candidate .
Not only is there the existence of that video clip where he said that he would withhold loan guarantees to Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor looking into the shady dealings of the company that his son was sitting on the board of , he ’ s awful with voters that disagree with him , calling them names and challenging them to “ step outside.
” Not to mention that the man can ’ t seem to remember his own name , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump at a campaign rally .
Trump is going to mop the floor with him in the debates .
This is literally the only card that the Democrats have to play .
Getting the Bernie Bros on board with the plan should be interesting .
Some of Bernie ’ s campaign staffers had threatened violence if he lost the nomination .
I guess we ’ ll have to see what happens at their convention .
• Send In The Clowns : ‘ Quid Pro Joe ’ Parades The ‘ Also-Rans ’ At His @ @ @ @ @ @ @ VIDEO ) • Two More Gaffes : Sleepy Joe Accidentally Endorses Trump & Gets His Own Name Wrong

Pocahantas has endorsed Sleepy Joe for President.
The day before Super Tuesday, Joe saw Beto, Buttigieg, and Klobuchar endorse him.
Then, on March 19, Tulsi Gabbard tossed her support behind Joe.
Another flurry of Democrats are scurrying to back the presumptive Democratic nominee. On Monday it was Joe’s rival, Bernie Sanders. Yesterday, it was Barack Obama. Today, it’s Liz Warren.
It’s almost like these waves are orchestrated.
In the span of just 48 hours, Joe Biden put to rest a major question surrounding Democratic efforts to win back the White House: 2020 will not be a repeat of 2016. One after the other, Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders threw their support behind the former vice president — with Elizabeth Warren soon to follow,according to sources familiar with the discussions. The rapid consolidation behind Biden offered the most powerful evidence yet of the party’s intent on avoiding the deadly fractiousness that contributed to Donald Trump’s victory four years ago.
Oh, that’s because it is orchestrated.
If you don’t think that it is, check out this snazzy video endorsement that Liz just managed to publish at precisely 9 am.
In this moment of crisis, it’s more important than ever that the next president restores Americans’ faith in good, effective government—and I’ve seen Joe Biden help our nation rebuild. Today, I’m proud to endorse @JoeBiden as President of the United States. pic.twitter.com/VrfBtJvFee — Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) April 15, 2020
That old thing? Oh, she just had those old family photos and video clips of Joe sitting around for a while and whipped up that video with transitions, a thorough script that reflected Obama’s endorsement, and captioned perfectly in no time at all.
She covered the same points as Obama did–his family history, including the tragedy he has suffered, his lifelong public servant status, his role leading the Recovery Act, and how the important thing that needs to happen is defeating Donald Trump.
The quick succession of endorsements so soon after Sanders dropped out of the race provided a rebuke to Trump’s attempts to sow discord within the party; the president has repeatedly sought to raise doubts about Obama and Sanders’ true allegiance to Biden. The endorsements also underscored Biden’s role as a coalition builder, which Democrats intend to hold up as a major contrast to Trump. Obama and Sanders struck similar notes in their remarks, contrasting Trump’s leadership style — which they characterized as self-serving, dictatorial and dangerous — to Biden’s, calling him compassionate and experienced. Biden’s aides pointed to the significance of the timing of the events, noting this is the earliest that a Democratic nomination has been conclusively wrapped up since 2004. Source: Politico
They’re afraid that Trump is going to win in 2020, and they’re determined to stop him.
Joe is a spectacularly terrible candidate. Not only is there the existence of that video clip where he said that he would withhold loan guarantees to Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor looking into the shady dealings of the company that his son was sitting on the board of, he’s awful with voters that disagree with him, calling them names and challenging them to “step outside.” Not to mention that the man can’t seem to remember his own name, and at one point, he accidentally endorsed Trump at a campaign rally.
Trump is going to mop the floor with him in the debates. This is literally the only card that the Democrats have to play.
Getting the Bernie Bros on board with the plan should be interesting. Some of Bernie’s campaign staffers had threatened violence if he lost the nomination. I guess we’ll have to see what happens at their convention.
Related:


clashdaily--2020-04-15--Justice Department Sides With Churches In First Amendment Lawsuit Against Local Government

You may have heard about the church in Mississippi suing after having tickets handed out to people sitting in their cars during a ‘ drive-through ’ church service .
The DOJ has weighed in on the issue .
The Justice Department took the rare step on Tuesday of weighing in on the side of a Mississippi Christian church where local officials had tried to stop Holy Week services broadcast to congregants sitting in their cars in the parking lot .
As the coronavirus pandemic spread , leaders at Temple Baptist Church in Greenville began holding drive-in services for their congregation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an empty church save for the preacher .
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place Arthur Scott , the 82-year-old pastor , said Tuesday that it was a good compromise for his group , a “ wonderful way to preach the gospel and still it ’ s like they are there , but you can ’ t go out and see them , but you know they ’ re there.
” — AP The mayor said they wouldn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but this issue is a lot bigger than just one city ’ s spat with church attendees , and Bill Barr has weighed in .
The Justice Department argued in the filing that the city appeared to be targeting religious conduct by singling churches out as the only essential service ( as designated by the state of Mississippi ) that may not operate despite following all Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state recommendations regarding social distancing .
“ The facts alleged in the complaint strongly suggest that the city ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ filing says .
“ If proven , these facts establish a free exercise violation unless the city demonstrates that its actions are neutral and apply generally to nonreligious and religious institutions or satisfies the demanding strict scrutiny standard.
” Barr said that he believes there is a sufficient basis for social distancing rules that have been put in place , but that the restrictions must be applied evenly and not single out religious institutions .
“ But even in times of emergency , when reasonable and temporary restrictions are placed on rights , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prohibit discrimination against religious institutions and religious believers , ” Barr said in a statement .
“ Thus , government may not impose special restrictions on religious activity that do not also apply to similar nonreligious activity.
” — AP You mean , the First Amendment isn ’ t something that simply disappears when it becomes an inconvenience to the Government ’ s broader objectives ?
We should write that into law or something .
Maybe we could give it a zippy name like ‘ the Bill of Rights ’ .
Could examples @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t trust the government to abide by an honor system ?
The Second Amendment is there as a failsafe in case the worst parts of human nature find their way into positions of power .

You may have heard about the church in Mississippi suing after having tickets handed out to people sitting in their cars during a ‘drive-through’ church service.
The DOJ has weighed in on the issue.
The Justice Department took the rare step on Tuesday of weighing in on the side of a Mississippi Christian church where local officials had tried to stop Holy Week services broadcast to congregants sitting in their cars in the parking lot. As the coronavirus pandemic spread, leaders at Temple Baptist Church in Greenville began holding drive-in services for their congregation on a short-wave radio frequency from inside an empty church save for the preacher. Arthur Scott, the 82-year-old pastor, said Tuesday that it was a good compromise for his group, a “wonderful way to preach the gospel and still it’s like they are there, but you can’t go out and see them, but you know they’re there.” — AP
The mayor said they wouldn’t have to pay the fines, but this issue is a lot bigger than just one city’s spat with church attendees, and Bill Barr has weighed in.
The Justice Department argued in the filing that the city appeared to be targeting religious conduct by singling churches out as the only essential service (as designated by the state of Mississippi) that may not operate despite following all Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state recommendations regarding social distancing. “The facts alleged in the complaint strongly suggest that the city’s actions target religious conduct,” the filing says. “If proven, these facts establish a free exercise violation unless the city demonstrates that its actions are neutral and apply generally to nonreligious and religious institutions or satisfies the demanding strict scrutiny standard.” Barr said that he believes there is a sufficient basis for social distancing rules that have been put in place, but that the restrictions must be applied evenly and not single out religious institutions. “But even in times of emergency, when reasonable and temporary restrictions are placed on rights, the First Amendment and federal statutory law prohibit discrimination against religious institutions and religious believers,” Barr said in a statement. “Thus, government may not impose special restrictions on religious activity that do not also apply to similar nonreligious activity.” — AP
You mean, the First Amendment isn’t something that simply disappears when it becomes an inconvenience to the Government’s broader objectives?
Gee, what a novel idea.
We should write that into law or something.
Maybe we could give it a zippy name like ‘the Bill of Rights’.
Could examples like this one that be why citizens don’t trust the government to abide by an honor system? The Second Amendment is there as a failsafe in case the worst parts of human nature find their way into positions of power.


clashdaily--2020-04-15--Jim Acosta Spews Chinese Propaganda… Gets Taken To The Woodshed

Sorry to break it to you Jimmy , Xi will never ask you to the Prom , no matter HOW much you lick his boots .
Acosta is so committed to looking for ways to stick a shiv in Trump that he doesn ’ t mind siding with Communist propaganda to do it .
Of course , everyone on this list qualify as ‘ scapegoats ’ because there is exactly ONE person Acosta is desperate to hang the albatross of this crisis around the neck of , and he happens to be President of the United States .
But why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place What do we know about those ‘ scapegoats ’ ?
The WHO gave bogus guidance that robbed the entire world of precious time in ramping up their preparedness for the coming crisis .
They also told us there had been no human-to-human transmission and that Masks don ’ t help .
Democrats in Congress ?
They ’ ve been spewing phrases like ‘ blood on his hands ’ while the record shows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the President .
You don ’ t get to have it both ways .
Governors ?
If you have any appreciation of the separation of powers , the Governors are far more directly responsible for preparations at the individual state level than the President .
And when we hear news like Cuomo prioritized the purchase of solar panels over respirators , while stockpiling ‘ extras ’ in Jersey , it puts the crisis in a slightly different perspective .
News media ?
They ’ ve been busted consistently framing the news in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they have to flip the narrative , selectively edit Trump ’ s statements , and contradict their own reporting to accomplish that .
Including the really ‘ important ’ stories serving the national interest like ridiculing Pence for praying with his Coronovirus team , falsely claiming that the President had ‘ fired ’ his Pandemic preparedness team , and kvetching that there were too many white men on it .
Face it , you ’ re no ‘ victims ’ here .
Obama was told about the need for more respirators , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If there were a way to pin that on Dubya while letting their BFF Obama skate , we ’ re pretty confident they would do so in a heartbeat .
And China ?
Who could POSSIBLY point a finger of blame at the nation that lied about the extent of the problem , destroyed medical records , and refused to cooperate with the rest of the world while ( it is claimed ) discreetly buying up massive amounts of PPE from around the world to ship it to China ?
Was that for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the market ?
Will we ever even know ?
Pay no attention to the known history , though… This is just Trump posturing .
( Or something . )
Does anyone know whether Acosta ’ s paycheck is in Dollars or in Yuan ?
Needless to say , he got trolled hard .
Maybe if Acosta spent more time actually REPORTING the news , rather than trying to manufacture it , he ’ d have more respect ?
But of course , that would take levels of character and integrity beyond anything we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ Dear Diary ’ … isn ’ t it ?

Sorry to break it to you Jimmy, Xi will never ask you to the Prom, no matter HOW much you lick his boots.
Acosta is so committed to looking for ways to stick a shiv in Trump that he doesn’t mind siding with Communist propaganda to do it.
Of course, everyone on this list qualify as ‘scapegoats’ because there is exactly ONE person Acosta is desperate to hang the albatross of this crisis around the neck of, and he happens to be President of the United States. But why let facts get in the way?
What do we know about those ‘scapegoats’?
The WHO gave bogus guidance that robbed the entire world of precious time in ramping up their preparedness for the coming crisis. They also told us there had been no human-to-human transmission and that Masks don’t help.
‘scapegoat’.
Democrats in Congress? They’ve been spewing phrases like ‘blood on his hands’ while the record shows they took this threat less seriously than the President. You don’t get to have it both ways.
Governors? If you have any appreciation of the separation of powers, the Governors are far more directly responsible for preparations at the individual state level than the President. And when we hear news like Cuomo prioritized the purchase of solar panels over respirators, while stockpiling ‘extras’ in Jersey, it puts the crisis in a slightly different perspective.
News media? They’ve been busted consistently framing the news in the most damaging possible way … even if they have to flip the narrative, selectively edit Trump’s statements, and contradict their own reporting to accomplish that.
Including the really ‘important’ stories serving the national interest like ridiculing Pence for praying with his Coronovirus team, falsely claiming that the President had ‘fired’ his Pandemic preparedness team, and kvetching that there were too many white men on it.
Face it, you’re no ‘victims’ here.
Obama was told about the need for more respirators, but they didn’t buy any. If there were a way to pin that on Dubya while letting their BFF Obama skate, we’re pretty confident they would do so in a heartbeat.
And China? Who could POSSIBLY point a finger of blame at the nation that lied about the extent of the problem, destroyed medical records, and refused to cooperate with the rest of the world while (it is claimed) discreetly buying up massive amounts of PPE from around the world to ship it to China? Was that for their own use, or to corner the market? Will we ever even know?
Pay no attention to the known history, though…
This is just Trump posturing. (Or something.)
Does anyone know whether Acosta’s paycheck is in Dollars or in Yuan?
Needless to say, he got trolled hard.
Maybe if Acosta spent more time actually REPORTING the news, rather than trying to manufacture it, he’d have more respect?
But of course, that would take levels of character and integrity beyond anything we’ve come to expect of Mr. ‘Dear Diary’ … isn’t it?


clashdaily--2020-04-15--The Emasculated Prince: Harry Gives Up Hunting Because His Wife Disapproves

Not to be an ‘ I told you so ’ … but we DID warn him to run from this chick *before* they got hitched .
Now ?
Now he ’ s stuck with the decision he ’ s made .
And the decision he made was to drop his balls into his wife ’ s purse and dutifully adopt her worldview .
We still say marriage IS good and honorable .
But let the eunuch-formerly-called-a-prince stand as a stark warning that men need to be smart about WHICH wife you wind up with .
Trending : Top Prof ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place For a decision with such far-reaching implications , it ’ s important to think with your brain and not with , *ahem* , ‘ other considerations ’ .
What does he get to do for a hobby ?
Maybe she ’ ll let him take up macrame — if he asks really nicely .
Prince Harry will give up hunting because Meghan does not like it , the Duke ’ s fellow conservation champion Dr Jane Goodall has said .
Harry and Meghan are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 86 , and the Prince interviewed her for Vogue magazine last year .
Harry and Meghan are now living in lockdown close to Hollywood , Los Angeles .
Dr Goodall said she thought Harry is finding the move to LA amid the global pandemic “ a bit challenging ” following his move to North America from Canada and may give up hunting because of Meghan , who is a keen animal activist .
Her comments come after Harry has skipped several Royal Family hunts , with some sources close to the couple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Meghan .
The activist believes that Harry and his brother , the Duke of Cambridge , work to protect the natural world – apart from when they hunt .
She told the Radio Times : “ Yes [ they champion the natural world ] except they hunt and shoot .
But I think Harry will stop because Meghan doesn ’ t like hunting , so I suspect that is over for him .
“ I don ’ t know how his career is going to map out , but yes , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I think he ’ s finding life a bit challenging just now.
” Harry has missed several huntings , including the Royal ’ s annual summer holiday hunt at Balmoral in Scotland in August 2018 .
He also missed the Royal Boxing Day shoot at Sandringham in 2017 .
—Telegraph WTF ?
Prince Harry To Skip Christmas Hunt Because His Wife ’ s Anti-Hunting Get Doug Giles ’ book , Rise , Kill and Eat : A Theology of Hunting from Genesis to Revelation today !
If a person looked to Scripture and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Bible that address the topic of hunting , then they ’ d walk away thinking not only is hunting animals tolerated but it is endorsed by God .
And that ’ s exactly what this little book is about : proving that God , from Genesis to Revelation , is extremely cool with hunters and hunting .
I ’ ll go out on a biblical limb and claim right off the bat that you can not show me , through the balance of the Bible , that the God of the Scripture @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grilling of the animals He created .
~Doug Giles In his killer new book RISE , KILL & EAT : A Theology of Hunting From Genesis to Revelation Doug carries on with his courageous war against the lunatic fringe who dare recommend Bambi solutions to the annual production of edible wildlife .
–Ted Nugent Pussification : The Effeminization Of The American Male Doug Giles , best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog , ClashDaily.com , has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is , if the man-child will put down his frappuccino ; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome .
Buy Now : Pussification : The Effeminization Of The American Male

Not to be an ‘I told you so’… but we DID warn him to run from this chick *before* they got hitched.
Now? Now he’s stuck with the decision he’s made.
And the decision he made was to drop his balls into his wife’s purse and dutifully adopt her worldview.
We still say marriage IS good and honorable. But let the eunuch-formerly-called-a-prince stand as a stark warning that men need to be smart about WHICH wife you wind up with.
For a decision with such far-reaching implications, it’s important to think with your brain and not with, *ahem*, ‘other considerations’.
What does he get to do for a hobby?
Maybe she’ll let him take up macrame — if he asks really nicely.
Prince Harry will give up hunting because Meghan does not like it, the Duke’s fellow conservation champion Dr Jane Goodall has said. Harry and Meghan are both fans of the world-renowned chimpanzee activist, 86, and the Prince interviewed her for Vogue magazine last year. Harry and Meghan are now living in lockdown close to Hollywood, Los Angeles. Dr Goodall said she thought Harry is finding the move to LA amid the global pandemic “a bit challenging” following his move to North America from Canada and may give up hunting because of Meghan, who is a keen animal activist. Her comments come after Harry has skipped several Royal Family hunts, with some sources close to the couple claiming he has shunned the activity because of Meghan. The activist believes that Harry and his brother, the Duke of Cambridge, work to protect the natural world – apart from when they hunt. She told the Radio Times: “Yes [they champion the natural world] except they hunt and shoot. But I think Harry will stop because Meghan doesn’t like hunting, so I suspect that is over for him. “I don’t know how his career is going to map out, but yes, I’ve been in touch, though I think he’s finding life a bit challenging just now.” Harry has missed several huntings, including the Royal’s annual summer holiday hunt at Balmoral in Scotland in August 2018. He also missed the Royal Boxing Day shoot at Sandringham in 2017. —Telegraph
Related…
WTF? Prince Harry To Skip Christmas Hunt Because His Wife’s Anti-Hunting
Meghan Markle’s Brother Warns Prince Harry About Marrying Meghan – ‘Big Mistake’
P*SSIFICATION: Prince Harry & Wife Plan To Raise Their Spawn ‘GENDER FLUID’
If a person looked to Scripture and paid particular attention to the passages within the Bible that address the topic of hunting, then they’d walk away thinking not only is hunting animals tolerated but it is endorsed by God. And that’s exactly what this little book is about: proving that God, from Genesis to Revelation, is extremely cool with hunters and hunting. I’ll go out on a biblical limb and claim right off the bat that you cannot show me, through the balance of the Bible, that the God of the Scripture is against the responsible killing and the grilling of the animals He created. ~Doug Giles
In his killer new book RISE, KILL & EAT: A Theology of Hunting From Genesis to Revelation Doug carries on with his courageous war against the lunatic fringe who dare recommend Bambi solutions to the annual production of edible wildlife. –Ted Nugent
Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now: Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male


clashdaily--2020-04-15--UH-OH JOE! Records Show Hunter Biden Is STILL Listed As A Board Member Of A CHINESE Company

And just like that… suddenly Burisma is no longer the most controversial of Hunter Biden ’ s financial entanglements .
We ’ re in the middle of a crisis whose culpability breadcrumbs lead right to the feet of China ’ s Communist Party .
China made decisions to destroy evidence of the virus .
China downplayed the severity… even ‘ disappearing ’ some of their own whistleblowers .
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place China had WHO officials parrot party propaganda about the virus that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And now , with Biden the ‘ last man standing ’ in the Democrats ’ rousing game of “ how do we stop Sanders from becoming our presidential candidate ” … old questions are becoming relevant again .
Will we want to know what was REALLY happening with Burisma , and whether John Solomon ’ s reporting on the ‘ quid pro quo ’ entanglements between Hunter Biden , Burisma , and the Obama/Biden White House are as damning as they appear ?
Of course we will .
But suddenly , China @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that OTHER story back into play .
Hunter Biden — the same Hunter Biden who cried poor and fought like HELL not to have his income disclosed to the courts in a paternity suit — announced to the world he was cutting ties with his financial backers in China , to avoid any ( further ) appearance of conflict-of-interest .
Hunter had pledged to resign from the board at the end of October and was lauded by the Media ( D ) .
It ’ s been six months and records indicate he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chinese business records the DCNF accessed Tuesday still name Hunter Biden as a director of BHR .
He also retains a 10 % equity stake in BHR through his company , Skaneateles LLC , business records for the Chinese private equity firm show .
BHR manages the equivalent of $ 2.1 billion in assets , according to its website .
Hunter Biden has served as an unpaid member of BHR ’ s board since its founding in 2013 , and in October 2017 he obtained his equity stake in the firm with a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Hunter Biden had arranged for then-Vice President Joe Biden to shake hands with the CEO of BHR in December 2013 , a meeting that caused some White House advisors to worry whether the younger Biden was exposing his father to criticism , The New Yorker reported .
…The former vice president pledged in December that none of his family members , including Hunter Biden , would engage in foreign business activities were he to become the next president .
As of Tuesday , BHR ’ s file on China ’ s National @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) still lists Hunter Biden as being a director of BHR .
Qixinbao , an independent service that provides registration information on Chinese corporations , also listed Hunter Biden as a member of the BHR board on Tuesday .
— DailyCaller With pay-for-play accusations dogging the Biden family already , this could come as a serious blow to Bidens ’ credibility of being ‘ transparent ’ .
Hunter Biden Quits His China Gig As An Old Story About DOMESTIC Influence Peddling Has Resurfaced Hunter ’ s Not Alone : 5 Members Of Joe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ His Connections WATCH : Hunter Biden Admits He Got Cushy Jobs BECAUSE He Was The Son Of Joe Biden Too Big To Fail : Hunter Biden ’ s Co. Got $ 130M Bailout While Dad Was VP… Is That News ?
Other Hunter-AND-Joe-related scandals we ’ re still waiting for answers about… Emails Tying Whistleblower To Obama White House Meeting On Burisma And Hunter Biden The REAL reason Democrats were so desperate to set up a narrative painting the Ukraine call as Trump ‘ destroying a political rival ’ … they have something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ Debunked ’ Joe & Hunter Biden Story Is Here To Stay BOOM : New Hunter Biden & Burisma Documents Surface… And They ’ re Bad News For Democrats

And just like that… suddenly Burisma is no longer the most controversial of Hunter Biden’s financial entanglements.
We’re in the middle of a crisis whose culpability breadcrumbs lead right to the feet of China’s Communist Party.
China made decisions to destroy evidence of the virus.
China downplayed the severity… even ‘disappearing’ some of their own whistleblowers.
China had WHO officials parrot party propaganda about the virus that later turned out to be wildly untrue.
And now, with Biden the ‘last man standing’ in the Democrats’ rousing game of “how do we stop Sanders from becoming our presidential candidate” … old questions are becoming relevant again.
Will we want to know what was REALLY happening with Burisma, and whether John Solomon’s reporting on the ‘quid pro quo’ entanglements between Hunter Biden, Burisma, and the Obama/Biden White House are as damning as they appear? Of course we will.
But suddenly, China is in the spotlight.
Which brings that OTHER story back into play.
Hunter Biden — the same Hunter Biden who cried poor and fought like HELL not to have his income disclosed to the courts in a paternity suit — announced to the world he was cutting ties with his financial backers in China, to avoid any (further) appearance of conflict-of-interest.
Hunter had pledged to resign from the board at the end of October and was lauded by the Media(D). It’s been six months and records indicate he still hasn’t followed through.
Chinese business records the DCNF accessed Tuesday still name Hunter Biden as a director of BHR. He also retains a 10% equity stake in BHR through his company, Skaneateles LLC, business records for the Chinese private equity firm show. BHR manages the equivalent of $2.1 billion in assets, according to its website. Hunter Biden has served as an unpaid member of BHR’s board since its founding in 2013, and in October 2017 he obtained his equity stake in the firm with a $420,000 investment, according to Mesires. Hunter Biden had arranged for then-Vice President Joe Biden to shake hands with the CEO of BHR in December 2013, a meeting that caused some White House advisors to worry whether the younger Biden was exposing his father to criticism, The New Yorker reported. …The former vice president pledged in December that none of his family members, including Hunter Biden, would engage in foreign business activities were he to become the next president. As of Tuesday, BHR’s file on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) still lists Hunter Biden as being a director of BHR. Qixinbao, an independent service that provides registration information on Chinese corporations, also listed Hunter Biden as a member of the BHR board on Tuesday. — DailyCaller
With pay-for-play accusations dogging the Biden family already, this could come as a serious blow to Bidens’ credibility of being ‘transparent’.
Related stories…
Biden family pay-for-play allegations…
Hunter Biden Quits His China Gig As An Old Story About DOMESTIC Influence Peddling Has Resurfaced
Hunter’s Not Alone: 5 Members Of Joe Biden’s Family Got Rich Through His Connections
WATCH: Hunter Biden Admits He Got Cushy Jobs BECAUSE He Was The Son Of Joe Biden
Too Big To Fail: Hunter Biden’s Co. Got $130M Bailout While Dad Was VP… Is That News?
Other Hunter-AND-Joe-related scandals we’re still waiting for answers about…
Emails Tying Whistleblower To Obama White House Meeting On Burisma And Hunter Biden
The REAL reason Democrats were so desperate to set up a narrative painting the Ukraine call as Trump ‘destroying a political rival’… they have something to hide.
5 More Reasons That ‘Debunked’ Joe & Hunter Biden Story Is Here To Stay
BOOM: New Hunter Biden & Burisma Documents Surface… And They’re Bad News For Democrats


clashdaily--2020-04-15--Are We About To See A MEAT Shortage As A Result Of COVID-19?

Say it ain ’ t so !
It ’ s not bad enough that we ’ re stuck at home , but we might have to go VEGAN , too ?
Will the forced compliance still hold if it comes to that ?
One of the unintended consequences of this virus is what it ’ s doing to meat processing plants .
As some food workers across the U.S. are becoming infected by the coronavirus , some plants that process beef , pork and poultry are shutting down — raising the specter of meat shortages .
Trending : Top Prof @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place With the plant closures , the worry is that consumers will be impacted by shortages and higher prices .
In recent weeks , consumers also faced grocers putting buying limits on beef and chicken because of stockpiling .
At Holiday Market , Tom Violantesaid some suppliers have started limiting quantities of pork and beef .
Price increases , Violante fears , will be coming soon .
“ At this time , there is more problem with supply and not price , ” Violante @ @ @ @ @ @ @ runs through its current load of beef and pork the supply will be limited and the price increase will follow.
” Stores that use smaller processors said they are not experiencing a shortage as of yet .
— Detroit Free Press As people at these plants get sick , the plants are closing down .
And many of these plants were already short-staffed , either because of worker shortages that came from what was until recently a super-charged economy combined with absenteeism due either to employees falling ill or those with young children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ South Dakota plant represents about 5 % of the pork production in the U.S. , supplying nearly 130 million servings of food per week , according to a news release .
Employing more than 3,700 people , the plant uses has more than 550 independent family farmers that supply pork to the plant .
Smithfield is a wholly-owned subsidiary of WH Group of China .
The facility will close until further notice , though Smithfield , according to the news release , will process the current product in inventory .
“ It is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if our plants are not running , ” Sullivan said .
“ These facility closures will also have severe , perhaps disastrous , repercussions for many in the supply chain , first and foremost our nation ’ s livestock farmers .
These farmers have nowhere to send their animals.
” Smithfield said it will resume operating with “ further direction of local , state and federal officials .
” While no reopening date was given , Smithfield said its employees will be paid for the next two weeks .
Chicken does not appear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are limiting quantities customers can buy .
— Detroit Free Press Yes , you read that correctly — wholly-owned subsidiary of China .
All these stay-at-home orders are having trickle-down effects that are entirely unanticipated .
Including the fact that even ‘ necessary ’ workers are unwilling to neglect their own kids just to show up at work .

Say it ain’t so! It’s not bad enough that we’re stuck at home, but we might have to go VEGAN, too?
Will the forced compliance still hold if it comes to that?
One of the unintended consequences of this virus is what it’s doing to meat processing plants.
As some food workers across the U.S. are becoming infected by the coronavirus, some plants that process beef, pork and poultry are shutting down — raising the specter of meat shortages. With the plant closures, the worry is that consumers will be impacted by shortages and higher prices. In recent weeks, consumers also faced grocers putting buying limits on beef and chicken because of stockpiling. At Holiday Market, Tom Violantesaid some suppliers have started limiting quantities of pork and beef. Price increases, Violante fears, will be coming soon. “At this time, there is more problem with supply and not price,” Violante said. “When the supply chain runs through its current load of beef and pork the supply will be limited and the price increase will follow.” Stores that use smaller processors said they are not experiencing a shortage as of yet. — Detroit Free Press
As people at these plants get sick, the plants are closing down.
And many of these plants were already short-staffed, either because of worker shortages that came from what was until recently a super-charged economy combined with absenteeism due either to employees falling ill or those with young children at home without child-care options.
The South Dakota plant represents about 5% of the pork production in the U.S., supplying nearly 130 million servings of food per week, according to a news release. Employing more than 3,700 people, the plant uses has more than 550 independent family farmers that supply pork to the plant. Smithfield is a wholly-owned subsidiary of WH Group of China. The facility will close until further notice, though Smithfield, according to the news release, will process the current product in inventory. “It is impossible to keep our grocery stores stocked if our plants are not running,” Sullivan said. “These facility closures will also have severe, perhaps disastrous, repercussions for many in the supply chain, first and foremost our nation’s livestock farmers. These farmers have nowhere to send their animals.” Smithfield said it will resume operating with “further direction of local, state and federal officials. ” While no reopening date was given, Smithfield said its employees will be paid for the next two weeks. Chicken does not appear to be impacted, though several stores are limiting quantities customers can buy. — Detroit Free Press
Yes, you read that correctly — wholly-owned subsidiary of China.
All these stay-at-home orders are having trickle-down effects that are entirely unanticipated. Including the fact that even ‘necessary’ workers are unwilling to neglect their own kids just to show up at work.


clashdaily--2020-04-15--WATCH: Big Chick Starts Grocery Store Brawl Over ‘Social Distancing’ Rules

Not only is this chick wound a little too tight , but she seems to be missing the point entirely on the whole ‘ social distancing ’ thing .
This heavyset chick with a chip on her shoulder started chewing up a shopowner for how one of his workers stood too close to other people in a store .
She decided to spend her Easter Sunday accosting strangers .
‘ Why do you have a worker like that ?
’ Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The ‘ worker ’ was actually a CUSTOMER .
But why let facts get in the way of a good rant ?
Then she lunged at the ‘ worker ’ who had offended her .
If ANYONE is violating social distancing rules in this situation you ’ d think it just MIGHT be the person engaged in physical assault… right ?
Suddenly , Miss ‘ social distancing ’ finds herself in the middle of a crowd of people who don ’ t have time or inclination to deal with her stupidity .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gives a description of events : In the video , the woman can be heard asking the store owner : ‘ Do you own this shop ?
Why do you have a worker like that ?
’ She starts lunging at several men who quickly surround her and become involved in the scuffle as another person starts shouting : ‘ He is a customer .
He is a customer.
’ A group of men start to shove her towards the door as bystanders look on bemused at what is happening as products are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is apparently wrestled to the floor by the men in the busy shop .
A man in a red top then intervenes , telling the men : ‘ There were five of you on a woman .
Just calm down , calm down.
’ The owner responds : ‘ She smashed up my shop .
I haven ’ t done anything wrong .
It was all her.
’ … ’ She did apologise later , on the phone .
She is actually a regular customer with us .
This is something that happens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ business .
‘ We ’ ve got a Post Office too and we could have had 90 per cent of our salary paid by closing due to the coronavirus outbreak .
‘ However , we thought that we are the only Post Office open and NHS staff , older people and people who don ’ t have anybody rely on us .
If we close , what are they going to do ?
‘ We ’ re genuine people , but when somebody starts throwing punches and starts chucking stuff off the shelves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not gon na allow that .
‘ With social distancing , people are getting easily offended .
She ’ s not a small woman , she ’ s actually quite big , so when she got violent we had to get her out of the shop and keep people safe .
— DailyMail Sorry lady , but when you play stupid games , you win stupid prizes .
Punching at someone for failing to social distance to your liking ?
That really is next-level stupid .

Not only is this chick wound a little too tight, but she seems to be missing the point entirely on the whole ‘social distancing’ thing.
This heavyset chick with a chip on her shoulder started chewing up a shopowner for how one of his workers stood too close to other people in a store.
She decided to spend her Easter Sunday accosting strangers.
‘Why do you have a worker like that?’
That was her FIRST mistake.
The ‘worker’ was actually a CUSTOMER. But why let facts get in the way of a good rant?
Then she lunged at the ‘worker’ who had offended her.
If ANYONE is violating social distancing rules in this situation you’d think it just MIGHT be the person engaged in physical assault… right?
Suddenly, Miss ‘social distancing’ finds herself in the middle of a crowd of people who don’t have time or inclination to deal with her stupidity.
And down she goes.
The original article gives a description of events:
In the video, the woman can be heard asking the store owner: ‘Do you own this shop? Why do you have a worker like that?’ She starts lunging at several men who quickly surround her and become involved in the scuffle as another person starts shouting: ‘He is a customer. He is a customer.’ A group of men start to shove her towards the door as bystanders look on bemused at what is happening as products are strewn across the aisles. The woman is apparently wrestled to the floor by the men in the busy shop. A man in a red top then intervenes, telling the men: ‘There were five of you on a woman. Just calm down, calm down.’ The owner responds: ‘She smashed up my shop. I haven’t done anything wrong. It was all her.’ …’She did apologise later, on the phone. She is actually a regular customer with us. This is something that happens sometimes. But we are a genuine business. ‘We’ve got a Post Office too and we could have had 90 per cent of our salary paid by closing due to the coronavirus outbreak. ‘However, we thought that we are the only Post Office open and NHS staff, older people and people who don’t have anybody rely on us. If we close, what are they going to do? ‘We’re genuine people, but when somebody starts throwing punches and starts chucking stuff off the shelves, damaging property, we’re not gonna allow that. ‘With social distancing, people are getting easily offended. She’s not a small woman, she’s actually quite big, so when she got violent we had to get her out of the shop and keep people safe. — DailyMail
Sorry lady, but when you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes.
Punching at someone for failing to social distance to your liking? That really is next-level stupid.


clashdaily--2020-04-15--Raleigh Police BLASTED For Calling Protesters ‘Non-Essential Activity’ — Here’s The 411

A year ago , would anyone have even IMAGINED a peaceful protest in America being dispersed by the government… on the government ’ s own say-so ?
Raleigh police told protesters who were lawfully petitioning their government for redress — by demanding the right to return to work — were told to go home .
Because their activity was deemed ‘ non-essential ’ .
That ’ s real easy to say if you ’ re a government employee who still has a job to show up to when this is all over , isn ’ t it ?
But what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place What about industries that are teetering on bankruptcy and face an uncertain future even IF they get massive government bailouts ?
Go home .
You ’ re supposed to ‘ shelter in place ’ .
Your government doesn ’ t want to hear from you .
Did anyone ASK ( or care ) whether the government WANTED to hear from the people ?
Don ’ t the PEOPLE have a RIGHT to petition their government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( representative government ! )
are causing them personal injury ?
To hear the police tell the story , the answer is simply… no .
Such freedoms have been suspended because… well , apparently , because they are too dangerous .
On what authority have they been suspended ?
Shhh !
You must not ask such questions , comrade !
“ Protesting Is A Non-Essential Activity ” , is it ?
We ’ re not sure the Founding Fathers would have agreed with that sentiment .
Or MLK , for that matter .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a CYA statement , too .
Don ’ t look at us , it was the State that did the arresting .
Yeah ?
And who dispersed the protesters with the implication that other arrests would follow ?
An official statement was released : That got panned , too .
The ‘ Too-Long-didn ’ t-read ’ version of the official statement goes like this : The Governor ’ s Executive Order declared a state of emergency and a stay-at-home proclamation .
It ’ s our job to uncritically follow orders .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safe .
Don ’ t bother us with your questions .
Send them to the Wake County DA and the State Capitol Police .
Tell that to the people who are out of work and desperate while being explicitly ignored by a government that still has a guaranteed paycheck… paid for by the very people they are sending home .

A year ago, would anyone have even IMAGINED a peaceful protest in America being dispersed by the government… on the government’s own say-so?
Raleigh police told protesters who were lawfully petitioning their government for redress — by demanding the right to return to work — were told to go home.
Because their activity was deemed ‘non-essential’.
That’s real easy to say if you’re a government employee who still has a job to show up to when this is all over, isn’t it? But what about everyone ELSE?
What about industries that are teetering on bankruptcy and face an uncertain future even IF they get massive government bailouts?
Go home. You’re supposed to ‘shelter in place’. Your government doesn’t want to hear from you.
Did anyone ASK (or care) whether the government WANTED to hear from the people?
Don’t the PEOPLE have a RIGHT to petition their government, especially when actions of their own (representative government!) are causing them personal injury?
To hear the police tell the story, the answer is simply… no.
Such freedoms have been suspended because… well, apparently, because they are too dangerous.
On what authority have they been suspended?
Shhh! You must not ask such questions, comrade!
The police department is facing scrutiny after arresting protesters in downtown Raleigh on Tuesday, asserting that such activity is in violation of the governor’s executive order limiting outdoor activities amid the coronavirus pandemic. “What part of the governor’s order was violated here?” one social media user asked. “Protesting is a non-essential activity,” the police department responded. According to local media, protesters called for the reopening of businesses, holding signs that said “Reopen NC,” “Freedom is not free,” and “#ReopenNC #Tyranny.” — Washington Examiner
We are reopening Wilmington and Jones Street. The protest has been cleared. There was one arrest made. #Raleigh #ReopenNC pic.twitter.com/DnQbFZusJy — Raleigh Police (@raleighpolice) April 14, 2020
“Protesting Is A Non-Essential Activity”, is it?
We’re not sure the Founding Fathers would have agreed with that sentiment. Or MLK, for that matter.
Don’t worry. They threw in a CYA statement, too.
Don’t look at us, it was the State that did the arresting.
Yeah? And who dispersed the protesters with the implication that other arrests would follow?
Their excuses didn’t hold much water:
An official statement was released:
That got panned, too.
I find it interesting that in this long winded bullshit of a statement trying to hide behind "orders" not once did you address your violating the constitution, or your oath of office. All you managed to say was "we're just following orders". You know who else said that? #ReopenNC https://t.co/YNv8mkpdRG pic.twitter.com/jS4KMUr1wL — Panther (@Pantherrawrs) April 15, 2020
The ‘Too-Long-didn’t-read’ version of the official statement goes like this:
The Governor’s Executive Order declared a state of emergency and a stay-at-home proclamation.
It’s our job to uncritically follow orders. We’re doing it to keep people safe.
Don’t bother us with your questions. Send them to the Wake County DA and the State Capitol Police.
Think that’s too harsh?
Tell that to the people who are out of work and desperate while being explicitly ignored by a government that still has a guaranteed paycheck… paid for by the very people they are sending home.


clashdaily--2020-04-15--Media Double Standard On Biden Accuser

Media Double Standard On Biden Accuser

Have you ever heard of Tara Reade ?
If you only get your news from the liberal media complex , especially CNN , you probably haven ’ t .
Tara Reade was a staff assistant to Joe Biden while he worked in the Senate .
She alleges , that in 1993 , Biden sexually assaulted her .
Reade ’ s claim isn ’ t exactly new .
In an April 3 , 2019 article Reade alleged Biden touched her several times making her feel uncomfortable .
Reade said her responsibilities in the senator ’ s office were reduced after she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — what she called a desire of Biden ’ s because he liked her legs .
Reade said she felt pushed out and left in August 1993 after some nine months .
In 2019 , Reade was one among many women who found Biden ’ s touching uncomfortable and inappropriate .
In March of 2020 , Reade revealed more .
She claimed it was more than just touching .
She ’ s claiming Biden “ shoved her up against a wall and penetrated her with his fingers.
” The natural question , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nearly a year to give this part of the story .
In response to that , Reade said she waited to share her account due to the criticism and threats she received after speaking out in 2019 .
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place These are serious and disturbing accusations .
It also must be noted that Biden and his campaign vehemently deny Reade ’ s charges .
As I and many others argued during the Kavanaugh debacle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of innocence , a chance to defend himself and due process .
I find it fascinating the reaction of some progressives fascinating .
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ( D-NY ) addressed the issue against presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden by a former Senate staffer , saying it was “ legitimate to talk about.
” “ It is highly significant that Reade told a friend about the incident contemporaneously–and relayed to others that something traumatic had transpired with Biden .
That kind of indirect witness testimony has been widely cited as evidence to support @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the hands of powerful men ” opined Joshua Holland of AlterNet .
The New York Times , CNN and other liberal media outlets ran multiple stories , many of them fabricated , during the Kavanaugh hearing .
Tara Reade ’ s story has been around quite a while , but CNN has not mentioned it .
Could it be the Democrats won ’ t unite around Joe ?
The Democrat media enablers are doing what they can to help Biden .
Jonathan S. Tobin of National Review writes of an interview Dean @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , did with Ben Smith reporting , “ Baquet appeared to acknowledge that he edited out a reference to other accusations against Biden at the behest of the Biden campaign , lending weight to the claim that the Times ’ decision was heavily influenced by its political lean.
” Reade has filed a police report about the incident .
So , what does all this mean ?
First , the media is biased and does not care to honestly report anything .
This isn ’ t news .
How the media treats Tara @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treated Christine Blasey-Ford .
Emily Jashinsky writes , “ Reade ’ s story went untouched by The New York Times , the Washington Post , and most of the legacy media for 19 days .
The Post reported Ford ’ s allegation shortly after she agreed to go on the record , which took months and came after other outlets were closing in on the story.
” Second , there is not a lie , smear or vile act that the left won ’ t utilize to try to defeat President Trump in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to run Biden against Trump .
I am waiting to hear from Senator Kamal Harris ( D-NY ) who at the time of the Kavanaugh confirmation exclaimed of Blasey-Ford , “ She ’ s doing it , I believe , because she knows that this is an important matter .
It ’ s a serious matter .
And she has the courage to come forward .
She has nothing to gain .
What does she have to gain ?
” Sen. Mazie Hirono ( D-HI ) proclaimed , “ We have to create @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and be heard and be listened to.
” I wonder if that environment will matter as much in 2020 as it did in 2018 ?
Again , we don ’ t know if Biden sexually assaulted Reade or not .
What we do know is that the media and the Democrats are liars and hypocrites .
If a Republican is charged , there is no limit to the coverage and no doubt the woman has to be believed .
If the charge is against a Democrat , it ’ s okay .
Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ good guys ” according to the Democrats and the media .
We are in the middle of a pandemic and Biden is virtually in hiding .
However , when the pandemic is over and the campaign begins again , the name Tara Reade ought not be forgotten .

Have you ever heard of Tara Reade? If you only get your news from the liberal media complex, especially CNN, you probably haven’t. Tara Reade was a staff assistant to Joe Biden while he worked in the Senate. She alleges, that in 1993, Biden sexually assaulted her.
Reade’s claim isn’t exactly new. In an April 3, 2019 article Reade alleged Biden touched her several times making her feel uncomfortable. Reade said her responsibilities in the senator’s office were reduced after she refused to serve drinks at an event — what she called a desire of Biden’s because he liked her legs. Reade said she felt pushed out and left in August 1993 after some nine months.
In 2019, Reade was one among many women who found Biden’s touching uncomfortable and inappropriate.
In March of 2020, Reade revealed more. She claimed it was more than just touching. She’s claiming Biden “shoved her up against a wall and penetrated her with his fingers.” The natural question, I think, is why did she wait nearly a year to give this part of the story. In response to that, Reade said she waited to share her account due to the criticism and threats she received after speaking out in 2019.
These are serious and disturbing accusations. It also must be noted that Biden and his campaign vehemently deny Reade’s charges. As I and many others argued during the Kavanaugh debacle, Biden ought to have the presumption of innocence, a chance to defend himself and due process.
I find it fascinating the reaction of some progressives fascinating. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) addressed the issue against presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden by a former Senate staffer, saying it was “legitimate to talk about.”
“It is highly significant that Reade told a friend about the incident contemporaneously–and relayed to others that something traumatic had transpired with Biden. That kind of indirect witness testimony has been widely cited as evidence to support other women’s accounts of abuse at the hands of powerful men” opined Joshua Holland of AlterNet.
The New York Times, CNN and other liberal media outlets ran multiple stories, many of them fabricated, during the Kavanaugh hearing. Tara Reade’s story has been around quite a while, but CNN has not mentioned it.
Could it be the Democrats won’t unite around Joe? The Democrat media enablers are doing what they can to help Biden.
Jonathan S. Tobin of National Review writes of an interview Dean Baquet, of the New York Times, did with Ben Smith reporting, “Baquet appeared to acknowledge that he edited out a reference to other accusations against Biden at the behest of the Biden campaign, lending weight to the claim that the Times’ decision was heavily influenced by its political lean.”
Reade has filed a police report about the incident.
So, what does all this mean?
First, the media is biased and does not care to honestly report anything. This isn’t news. How the media treats Tara Reade is far different than how it treated Christine Blasey-Ford. Emily Jashinsky writes, “Reade’s story went untouched by The New York Times, the Washington Post, and most of the legacy media for 19 days. The Post reported Ford’s allegation shortly after she agreed to go on the record, which took months and came after other outlets were closing in on the story.”
Second, there is not a lie, smear or vile act that the left won’t utilize to try to defeat President Trump in November. They will ignore serious accusations to run Biden against Trump.
I am waiting to hear from Senator Kamal Harris (D-NY) who at the time of the Kavanaugh confirmation exclaimed of Blasey-Ford, “She’s doing it, I believe, because she knows that this is an important matter. It’s a serious matter. And she has the courage to come forward. She has nothing to gain. What does she have to gain?”
Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) proclaimed, “We have to create an environment where women can come forward and be heard and be listened to.” I wonder if that environment will matter as much in 2020 as it did in 2018?
Again, we don’t know if Biden sexually assaulted Reade or not. What we do know is that the media and the Democrats are liars and hypocrites. If a Republican is charged, there is no limit to the coverage and no doubt the woman has to be believed. If the charge is against a Democrat, it’s okay. Biden is, after all, one of the “good guys” according to the Democrats and the media.
We are in the middle of a pandemic and Biden is virtually in hiding. However, when the pandemic is over and the campaign begins again, the name Tara Reade ought not be forgotten.


clashdaily--2020-04-15--Top Prof’s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns

Top Prof’s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place

This prof says that it was a terrible miscalculation to insist on persistent lockdowns that shut down the global economy .
Major Gen. ( Res ) Prof. Isaac Ben-Israel , holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy and a B.Sc .
in Physics and Mathematics from Tel Aviv University .
He is the Chairman of the Israeli Space Agency and the National Council for Research and Development , and is the head of the Security Studies program at Tel Aviv University .
Professor Ben-Israel along with his colleagues , Prof. Ziegler of the Technion and Ronnie Yefarah , have conducted an examination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country and they have made some interesting observations .
This professor says that mathematical models show that the outbreak peaks at 40 days and peters out by 70 days , and it doesn ’ t seem to matter if lockdown orders are in place or not .
He describes research that he has conducted with a fellow professor , which he says shows that the number of new cases of the virus peaks after about 40 days and declines to near zero after 70 days , no matter where in the world it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down their economies or not .
Latest : Fauci Claims Jesus & The Apostle Paul Were Wrong - Here 's His Problem With Them While he supports social distancing , he says the widespread shuttering of economies worldwide is a demonstrable error .
In Israel ’ s case , he notes , about 140 people normally die every day .
To have shuttered much of the economy because of a virus that is killing one or two a day is a radical error that is unnecessarily costing Israel 20 % of its GDP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the left of “ If it saves just one life !
” while ignoring the millions of people facing job loss , hardship , and countless other forms of suffering .
The Professor examined the outbreak of coronavirus in Israel , which has imposed strict lockdowns , as well as the outbreaks in other countries .
“ The incidence of patients was greater by the day .
This was during the first four weeks after the epidemic was discovered in Israel .
As of the sixth week , the increase in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peaking in the sixth week at 700 patients per day .
Since then it has been declining , and today there are only 300 new patients .
In two weeks it will reach zero and there will be no more new patients , ” Prof. Ben-Israel said .
“ This is how it is all over the world .
Both in countries where they have taken closure steps like Italy and in countries that have not had closures like Taiwan or Singapore .
In such and such countries there is an increase until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immediately thereafter moderation until during the eighth week it disappears.
” … … ” This is happening both in countries that have closed down like us and in those that have not closed until today like Sweden , every country no matter its response .
The decline and rise occur according to the same timeline , ” he said , adding that his observations are based entirely on past data without attempting to guess what will happen in the future .
“ It ’ s clear to us how the epidemic is starting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ What is causing the moderation is unclear .
Therefore , I propose that we end the closures immediately after the current week .
We will start increasing the workforce from 15 percent to fifty percent and in two weeks we will reach 100 percent.
” It should be noted that Professor Ben-Israel is a mathematician and not an expert in public health , however , public health experts have relied on models as the basis for public policy .
Also , models are don ’ t account for anything other than the information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t take into consideration changes variables such as changes to behavior unless those are specifically calculated in .
Professor Ben-Israel ’ s model has been criticized by Prof Gabi Barbash , Israel ’ s former Health Ministry Director-General .
He said that Ben-Israel ’ s analysis is incorrect and that the death toll would have been much higher if lockdowns hadn ’ t been imposed by Israel and many other countries .
He added , “ I strongly urge that we not let mathematicians — who know nothing about biology — determine when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disagrees .
He says that the data from countries that didn ’ t impose strict lockdowns actually proves his point .
But Ben Israel says the figures — notably from countries , such as Singapore , Taiwan , and Sweden , which did not take such radical measures to shutter their economies — prove his point .
High death tolls in some countries are a factor of their healthcare systems being overwhelmed , he acknowledges .
When Barbash cites New York as one example of an overwhelmed healthcare system , and argues that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worldwide , Ben Israel says the latest indications from New York are that the strain on the healthcare system is starting to recede — in line with his statistics that show daily new cases figures peaking and starting to fall after 40 days .
Professor Ben-Israel does say that social distancing and other precautions should continue to be taken , but keeping healthy people home doesn ’ t seem to make sense .
He urges that “ we take all the hygienic steps like wearing masks and keeping our distance from person to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not cost the economy .
What bothers me is the damage to the economy .
We are paying NIS 100 billion a month because of this closure .
This also has implications for health .
We will pay with more human lives with our health system in the current state.
” He ’ s right about the impact on the health system , and not just in places where healthcare is government-run .
In some jurisdictions , elective and non-urgent procedures are being delayed while the system is stretched thin due to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We don ’ t know what the long-term cost of those decisions will be , or the number of lives lost because of delays in cancer treatment or organ transplants .
That also doesn ’ t include the well-studied link between job loss and an increase in substance abuse .
We can not live locked up forever .
That ’ s just not an option .

This prof says that it was a terrible miscalculation to insist on persistent lockdowns that shut down the global economy.
Major Gen. (Res) Prof. Isaac Ben-Israel, holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy and a B.Sc. in Physics and Mathematics from Tel Aviv University. He is the Chairman of the Israeli Space Agency and the National Council for Research and Development, and is the head of the Security Studies program at Tel Aviv University. Professor Ben-Israel along with his colleagues, Prof. Ziegler of the Technion and Ronnie Yefarah, have conducted an examination of the outbreaks of COVID-19 country by country and they have made some interesting observations.
This professor says that mathematical models show that the outbreak peaks at 40 days and peters out by 70 days, and it doesn’t seem to matter if lockdown orders are in place or not.
He describes research that he has conducted with a fellow professor, which he says shows that the number of new cases of the virus peaks after about 40 days and declines to near zero after 70 days, no matter where in the world it strikes and no matter whether countries shut down their economies or not. While he supports social distancing, he says the widespread shuttering of economies worldwide is a demonstrable error. In Israel’s case, he notes, about 140 people normally die every day. To have shuttered much of the economy because of a virus that is killing one or two a day is a radical error that is unnecessarily costing Israel 20% of its GDP, he charges. Source: The Times Of Israel
Cue the handwringing on the left of “If it saves just one life!” while ignoring the millions of people facing job loss, hardship, and countless other forms of suffering.
The Professor examined the outbreak of coronavirus in Israel, which has imposed strict lockdowns, as well as the outbreaks in other countries.
“The incidence of patients was greater by the day. This was during the first four weeks after the epidemic was discovered in Israel. As of the sixth week, the increase in the number of patients has been moderate, peaking in the sixth week at 700 patients per day. Since then it has been declining, and today there are only 300 new patients. In two weeks it will reach zero and there will be no more new patients,” Prof. Ben-Israel said. “This is how it is all over the world. Both in countries where they have taken closure steps like Italy and in countries that have not had closures like Taiwan or Singapore. In such and such countries there is an increase until the fourth to sixth week, and immediately thereafter moderation until during the eighth week it disappears.”… …”This is happening both in countries that have closed down like us and in those that have not closed until today like Sweden, every country no matter its response. The decline and rise occur according to the same timeline,” he said, adding that his observations are based entirely on past data without attempting to guess what will happen in the future. “It’s clear to us how the epidemic is starting and what is causing the increase. What is causing the moderation is unclear. Therefore, I propose that we end the closures immediately after the current week. We will start increasing the workforce from 15 percent to fifty percent and in two weeks we will reach 100 percent.” Source: Israel National News
It should be noted that Professor Ben-Israel is a mathematician and not an expert in public health, however, public health experts have relied on models as the basis for public policy.
Also, models are don’t account for anything other than the information that is put into them–they don’t take into consideration changes variables such as changes to behavior unless those are specifically calculated in.
The prof quoted in article is a world renowned mathematician who is recognized for having built weapons systems that rely on extremely precise math models. If there's 1 person u should listen to about modeling, it's him. Modeling for him is a life or death, win or lose matter. — Jordan Schachtel (@JordanSchachtel) April 13, 2020
Professor Ben-Israel’s model has been criticized by Prof Gabi Barbash, Israel’s former Health Ministry Director-General. He said that Ben-Israel’s analysis is incorrect and that the death toll would have been much higher if lockdowns hadn’t been imposed by Israel and many other countries. He added, “I strongly urge that we not let mathematicians — who know nothing about biology — determine when we lift the lockdown.”
Professor Ben-Israel disagrees. He says that the data from countries that didn’t impose strict lockdowns actually proves his point.
But Ben Israel says the figures — notably from countries, such as Singapore, Taiwan, and Sweden, which did not take such radical measures to shutter their economies — prove his point. High death tolls in some countries are a factor of their healthcare systems being overwhelmed, he acknowledges. When Barbash cites New York as one example of an overwhelmed healthcare system, and argues that only radical measures are preventing worse crises worldwide, Ben Israel says the latest indications from New York are that the strain on the healthcare system is starting to recede — in line with his statistics that show daily new cases figures peaking and starting to fall after 40 days. Source: The Times Of Israel
Professor Ben-Israel does say that social distancing and other precautions should continue to be taken, but keeping healthy people home doesn’t seem to make sense. He urges that “we take all the hygienic steps like wearing masks and keeping our distance from person to person and banning crowds because it does not cost the economy. What bothers me is the damage to the economy. We are paying NIS 100 billion a month because of this closure. This also has implications for health. We will pay with more human lives with our health system in the current state.”
He’s right about the impact on the health system, and not just in places where healthcare is government-run.
In some jurisdictions, elective and non-urgent procedures are being delayed while the system is stretched thin due to the sheer number of coronavirus patients requiring hospitalization. We don’t know what the long-term cost of those decisions will be, or the number of lives lost because of delays in cancer treatment or organ transplants.
That also doesn’t include the well-studied link between job loss and an increase in substance abuse.
We cannot live locked up forever. That’s just not an option.


clashdaily--2020-04-15--JOBAMA: Sleepy Joe FINALLY Gets Barry’s Endorsement For Presidential Run (VIDEO)

It took a while but now Joe has finally clinched the endorsement of the man that chose him as his running mate .
It only took being the last man standing to get it .
Former President Barack Obama delivered his long-awaited endorsement of Joe Biden for president on Tuesday , recording an 12-minute video to throw his support behind his former vice president .
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place Mr. Obama ’ s endorsement of his former vice president comes a day after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Biden ’ s presidential bid , ending speculation that the two rivals might remain at odds going into the general election season .
“ I ’ m so proud to endorse Joe Biden to be president of the United States , ” Mr. Obama said .
“ Choosing Joe to be my vice president was one of the best decisions I ever made , and he became a good friend .
And I believe Joe has all the qualities we need in a president right now.
” Source : CBS News Obama @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Great Uniter of the Democratic Party .
Barry had played a role in Bernie ’ s decision to suspend his campaign .
Part of this endorsement is about Obama ’ s legacy that has been systematically dismantled by the Trump administration .
His “ third term ” candidate , Hillary , didn ’ t win and it was a shock considering the effort that was put into spying on Trump ’ s campaign .
You know I could not be prouder of the incredible progress that we made together during my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ today , I wouldn ’ t run the same race or have the same platform as I did in 2008 .
The world is different ; there ’ s too much unfinished business for us to just look backwards .
We have to look to the future .
Bernie understands that , and Joe understands that .
Of course , Democrats may not always agree on every detail of the best way to bring about each and every one of these changes , but we do agree that they are needed and that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because one thing everybody has learned by now is that the Republicans occupying the White House and running the U.S. Senate are not interested in progress .
Barry ’ s reminding you that it isn ’ t about a different vision for how to get the country to do well , it ’ s because Republicans have an unquenchable thirst for power which is so unlike Democrats who didn ’ t just stall a COVID-related relief bill to insert their own spending priorities into it .
They are interested in power .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ off their health insurance and eliminate pre-existing condition protections for millions more even in the middle of this public health crisis , even as they are willing to spend $ 1 trillion on tax cuts for the wealthy .
They have given polluters unlimited power to poison our air and their water and deny the science of climate change just as they denied the science of pandemics .
Repeatedly they have disregarded American principles of rule of law and voting rights and transparency , basic norms that previous administrations observed regardless of party @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our democracy .
As Obama has always done , he has taken some cheap and disingenuous shots at his political opponents as “ science deniers ” and his real nemesis , Fox News .
So our country ’ s future hangs on this election , and it won ’ t be easy .
The other side has a massive war chest ; the other side has a propaganda network with little regard for the truth .
On the other hand , pandemics have a way of cutting through a lot of noise and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ real and what is important .
This crisis has reminded us that government matters .
It has reminded us that good government matters , that facts and science matter , that the rule of law matters , that having leaders who are informed and honest and seek to bring people together rather than drive them apart those kind of leaders matter .
In other words elections matter .
And , of course , the Orange Man Bad™ bit : Right now we need Americans of goodwill to unite in a great awakening against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ characterized by corruption , carelessness , self-dealing , disinformation , ignorance and just plain meanness and to change that we need Americans of all political stripes to get involved in our politics and our public life like never before .
For those of us who believe in building a more just , more generous , more democratic America where everybody has a fair shot at opportunity , for those of us who believe in a government that cares about the many and not just the few , for those of us who love @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our part to make sure it lives up to its highest ideals now is the time to fight for what we believe in .
Good luck getting the Bernie Bros on board with Joe as the nominee .
I don ’ t even think the great Obamessiah could manage that .

It took a while but now Joe has finally clinched the endorsement of the man that chose him as his running mate.
It only took being the last man standing to get it.
Former President Barack Obama delivered his long-awaited endorsement of Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, recording an 12-minute video to throw his support behind his former vice president. Mr. Obama’s endorsement of his former vice president comes a day after Senator Bernie Sanders gave a full-throated endorsement of Biden’s presidential bid, ending speculation that the two rivals might remain at odds going into the general election season. “I’m so proud to endorse Joe Biden to be president of the United States,” Mr. Obama said. “Choosing Joe to be my vice president was one of the best decisions I ever made, and he became a good friend. And I believe Joe has all the qualities we need in a president right now.”
Source: CBS News
Obama is now attempting to play the role of the Great Uniter of the Democratic Party. Barry had played a role in Bernie’s decision to suspend his campaign.
Part of this endorsement is about Obama’s legacy that has been systematically dismantled by the Trump administration. His “third term” candidate, Hillary, didn’t win and it was a shock considering the effort that was put into spying on Trump’s campaign.
You know I could not be prouder of the incredible progress that we made together during my presidency, but if I were running today, I wouldn’t run the same race or have the same platform as I did in 2008. The world is different; there’s too much unfinished business for us to just look backwards. We have to look to the future. Bernie understands that, and Joe understands that.
Here’s the uniting part:
Of course, Democrats may not always agree on every detail of the best way to bring about each and every one of these changes, but we do agree that they are needed and that only happens if we win this election because one thing everybody has learned by now is that the Republicans occupying the White House and running the U.S. Senate are not interested in progress.
Barry’s reminding you that it isn’t about a different vision for how to get the country to do well, it’s because Republicans have an unquenchable thirst for power which is so unlike Democrats who didn’t just stall a COVID-related relief bill to insert their own spending priorities into it.
They are interested in power. They have shown themselves willing to kick millions off their health insurance and eliminate pre-existing condition protections for millions more even in the middle of this public health crisis, even as they are willing to spend $1 trillion on tax cuts for the wealthy. They have given polluters unlimited power to poison our air and their water and deny the science of climate change just as they denied the science of pandemics. Repeatedly they have disregarded American principles of rule of law and voting rights and transparency, basic norms that previous administrations observed regardless of party, principles that are the bedrock of our democracy.
As Obama has always done, he has taken some cheap and disingenuous shots at his political opponents as “science deniers” and his real nemesis, Fox News.
So our country’s future hangs on this election, and it won’t be easy. The other side has a massive war chest; the other side has a propaganda network with little regard for the truth. On the other hand, pandemics have a way of cutting through a lot of noise and spin to remind us of what is real and what is important. This crisis has reminded us that government matters. It has reminded us that good government matters, that facts and science matter, that the rule of law matters, that having leaders who are informed and honest and seek to bring people together rather than drive them apart those kind of leaders matter. In other words elections matter.
And, of course, the Orange Man Bad™ bit:
Right now we need Americans of goodwill to unite in a great awakening against a politics that too often has been characterized by corruption, carelessness, self-dealing, disinformation, ignorance and just plain meanness and to change that we need Americans of all political stripes to get involved in our politics and our public life like never before. For those of us who believe in building a more just, more generous, more democratic America where everybody has a fair shot at opportunity, for those of us who believe in a government that cares about the many and not just the few, for those of us who love this country and are willing to do our part to make sure it lives up to its highest ideals now is the time to fight for what we believe in.
Good luck getting the Bernie Bros on board with Joe as the nominee. I don’t even think the great Obamessiah could manage that.


clashdaily--2020-04-14--COVIDICTATORS: State And Local Governments Ban Sale Of ‘Nonessential’ Items In Stores

Who gives the government the right to determine what is and is not “ essential ” ?
Let ’ s be real , electronics are the only things keeping us from a violent revolt right now–what would we do if we didn ’ t have Netflix , Amazon Prime Video , Disney+ , and Hulu ?
We ’ d be out there in front of City Hall with torches and pitchforks is my best guess .
Some state and local governments have used the coronavirus pandemic as a way to impose ridiculous fiats on the public in the name of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Vermont announced some restrictions on what was permissible to be sold in “ big box stores ” like Walmart , Target , and Costco .
The items could still be sold , but not within the stores , instead , they should be made available online , through telephone ordering , curbside pickup , or delivery .
This was in order to limit the number of people inside the store and maintain “ social distancing ” guidelines .
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The items that can not be sold in person include , but are not limited to , arts and crafts , beauty supplies , carpet and flooring , clothing , consumer electronics , entertainment , furniture , home and garden , jewelry , paint , photo services , sports equipment and toys .
Stores are ordered to close aisles , close portions of the store or remove items from the shelves .
The agency also said showrooms and garden sections of large home improvement centers should be closed unless there is a life-threatening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ things happening like packets of seeds sitting on shelves are unavailable for purchase if you ’ re already in the store .
Michigan ’ s Governor Whitmer must ’ ve thought this was a great idea because they did the same thing .
To many , the restrictions seem completely ridiculous and arbitrary .
As the weather warms up , the inability to purchase seeds for the garden in a store that you ’ re already shopping in seems to be an unnecessary restriction .
If the goal is “ social distancing ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , wouldn ’ t it be better to shop at one store than having you go directly to a dedicated home and garden store and interact with more people ?
The Board of Commissioners in Howard County , Indiana , enforced a similar rule earlier in March , preventing businesses in the area that were deemed essential from selling nonessential items .
The board said it had received complaints from businesses that were forced to close because they sold mostly nonessential items saying it was unfair for other stores to continue selling these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also complained that customers were congregating in stores and browsing nonessential goods because they were “ bored at home , ” thus filling up the aisles and putting workers at greater risk , the board said .
There have been reports elsewhere of other counties putting similar rules into play .
While some people said they disliked the new restrictions , others applauded the change and encouraged other local governments to do the same .
My biggest fear about this pandemic is how governments have shown how quickly they can flick on that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to do so .
The big question is–will we be able to turn it off again ?

Who gives the government the right to determine what is and is not “essential”?
Let’s be real, electronics are the only things keeping us from a violent revolt right now–what would we do if we didn’t have Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Disney+, and Hulu? We’d be out there in front of City Hall with torches and pitchforks is my best guess.
Some state and local governments have used the coronavirus pandemic as a way to impose ridiculous fiats on the public in the name of “public health.”
On April 2, Vermont announced some restrictions on what was permissible to be sold in “big box stores” like Walmart, Target, and Costco. The items could still be sold, but not within the stores, instead, they should be made available online, through telephone ordering, curbside pickup, or delivery. This was in order to limit the number of people inside the store and maintain “social distancing” guidelines.
The items that cannot be sold in person include, but are not limited to, arts and crafts, beauty supplies, carpet and flooring, clothing, consumer electronics, entertainment, furniture, home and garden, jewelry, paint, photo services, sports equipment and toys. Stores are ordered to close aisles, close portions of the store or remove items from the shelves. The agency also said showrooms and garden sections of large home improvement centers should be closed unless there is a life-threatening emergency. Source: WUSA 9
This order led to weird things happening like packets of seeds sitting on shelves are unavailable for purchase if you’re already in the store.
Michigan’s Governor Whitmer must’ve thought this was a great idea because they did the same thing.
.@GovWhitmer has banned us from growing our own food. This is fucking insane. pic.twitter.com/qOGMsBBVXJ — Whatevs II (@joesichspach) April 10, 2020
Here in Michigan, @GovWhitmer has banned the sale of seeds and carpet to protect the residents of Michigan. We are so lucky to have such a noble and fearless leader. ? pic.twitter.com/UzZm7auvP1 — masked taint (@_poeia) April 11, 2020
Has it come to this? Businesses being told to block off “non essential items” they are not allowed to sell. Do we realize how dangerous this is to allow the government to dictate what’s essential & what isn’t? We’ve seen what they consider “healthy”. ? SLIPPERY SLOPES HERE. pic.twitter.com/jnKVl3y1LR — Talia (@talialikeitis) March 29, 2020
To many, the restrictions seem completely ridiculous and arbitrary. As the weather warms up, the inability to purchase seeds for the garden in a store that you’re already shopping in seems to be an unnecessary restriction. If the goal is “social distancing” to reduce the transmission of the virus, wouldn’t it be better to shop at one store than having you go directly to a dedicated home and garden store and interact with more people?
The Board of Commissioners in Howard County, Indiana, enforced a similar rule earlier in March, preventing businesses in the area that were deemed essential from selling nonessential items. The board said it had received complaints from businesses that were forced to close because they sold mostly nonessential items saying it was unfair for other stores to continue selling these products. Retail workers in the area also complained that customers were congregating in stores and browsing nonessential goods because they were “bored at home,” thus filling up the aisles and putting workers at greater risk, the board said. There have been reports elsewhere of other counties putting similar rules into play. While some people said they disliked the new restrictions, others applauded the change and encouraged other local governments to do the same. Source: Business Insider
My biggest fear about this pandemic is how governments have shown how quickly they can flick on that authoritarian switch when they have an excuse to do so.
The big question is–will we be able to turn it off again?


clashdaily--2020-04-14--Remember ‘Civil Liberties’? Tucker And Judge Napolitano Put This Pandemic Response In Perspective

Public panic left a window of opportunity for flagrant abuses of civil liberties .
And many authoritarians took their shot .
This clip opens , appropriately , by referencing a cartoon about Washington turning to Madison as he ’ s signing the Constitution , saying ‘ let me get this straight , none of this counts if people get sick , right ?
’ There ’ s a REASON cartoonists are making jokes like that one .
Because they ’ re approaching just a little bit too close to reality .
Could any of us , in the second week @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about WWIII with Iran , in our wildest dreams have imagined what has happened since ?
Trending : Top Prof ’ s Data Analysis Of COVID-19 Outbreak Timeline Shows No Difference In Spread With Lockdowns In Place That the government would tell people not to go to work , or walk outside , or attend church … and that Americans — AMERICANS !
— would dutifully obey ?
We ALL would have called BS .
And yet here we are .
Tucker and the Judge take a look at what ’ s happened @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into town .
Governor Wittmer gets called out by name , but he didn ’ t stop with just her .
The judge called out the entire process of skipping right past legislators itself and politicians seizing powers that were never theirs to begin with .
As for the legislators , even THEY have to realize that — whether they like it or not — some things are entirely beyond their reach .
And no amount of ‘ but it ’ s for the public good ’ will change that .
For anyone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we DO have were eroded… this is NOT a point to be overlooked .

Public panic left a window of opportunity for flagrant abuses of civil liberties. And many authoritarians took their shot.
This clip opens, appropriately, by referencing a cartoon about Washington turning to Madison as he’s signing the Constitution, saying ‘let me get this straight, none of this counts if people get sick, right?’
There’s a REASON cartoonists are making jokes like that one. Because they’re approaching just a little bit too close to reality.
Could any of us, in the second week of January when we were being browbeaten about WWIII with Iran, in our wildest dreams have imagined what has happened since?
That the government would tell people not to go to work, or walk outside, or attend church … and that Americans — AMERICANS! — would dutifully obey?
We ALL would have called BS.
And yet here we are.
Tucker and the Judge take a look at what’s happened to our civil rights since Corona blew into town.
Governor Wittmer gets called out by name, but he didn’t stop with just her.
The judge called out the entire process of skipping right past legislators itself and politicians seizing powers that were never theirs to begin with.
As for the legislators, even THEY have to realize that — whether they like it or not — some things are entirely beyond their reach.
And no amount of ‘but it’s for the public good’ will change that.
For anyone watching how quickly and easily the rights we DO have were eroded… this is NOT a point to be overlooked.