clashdaily--2020-08-18--Never Forget That Kamala Harris Shut Down Clergy Sex Abuse Cases–Here’s The 411

This article originally appeared on The Lid and is reprinted here with permission .
Since the day she was named Joe Biden ’ s V.P .
Kamala Harris ( D-CA ) , the mainstream media has described Kamala Harris as a “ moderate ” who is so wonderful she practically walks on water .
Sadly the media doesn ’ t vet Democrats , because if they did some vetting of Harris ’ history as a prosecutor they would have discovered her disturbing record as the San Francisco DA–She refused to pursue child molestation criminal cases against Catholic priests investigated by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her for help with their civil cases against those molesters the victims say she covered up the evidence .
Coincidently ( if you believe in coincidences ) Kamala Harris received substantial campaign donations from people and organizations associated with the accused molesters and their defense .
In his book , Profiles in Corruption : Abuse of Power by America ’ s Progressive Elite , Peter Schweizer unveils how Harris refused to pursue the case .
And also exposes the fact that many of the law firms and lawyers who were representing the archdiocese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including priests that had been identified as possible culprits — gave significant contributions to Harris ’ s political campaign .
Some of them had never given contributions to a race like this before , but they came up with the cash for Kamala Harris .
During her decade-and-a-half tenure as a chief prosecutor , Harris would fail to prosecute a single case of priest abuse and her office would strangely hide vital records on abuses that had occurred , despite the protests of victims ’ groups .
Trending : This Republican Campaign Ad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( VIDEO ) Harris ’ s predecessor as San Francisco district attorney , Terence Hallinan , was aware of and had prosecuted numerous Catholic priests on sexual misconduct involving children .
And he had been gathering case files for even more… Hallinan ’ s office had launched an investigation and quickly discovered that the San Francisco Archdiocese had extensive internal records concerning complaints going back some seventy-five years .
In spring of 2002 , Hallinan demanded the church turn them over to his office .
Eventually , the archdiocese turned over the documents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the papers revealed the names of forty current and ex-priests who were accused of sexual abuse .
DA Hallinan took the docs and began the process of bringing them to justice , However , many of the cases were past what had been the statute of limitations .
And just as the cases were heating up , the U.S. Supreme Court decision overturned a 1994 California law that retroactively eliminated the statute of limitations for sexual abuse cases .
So instead of criminal prosecution for the older cases , Hallinan was forced to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hold the offenders accountable by releasing the clergy abuse files to the public and aiding the victims in civil cases .
But then Terence Hallinan made a big mistake .
He lost his reelection bid to Kamala Harris .
Of course , she had a little help from the local Catholic organizations that were freaking out over the prospect for Hallinan releasing the documents and helping the abuse victims .
As Peter Schweizer explained in Profiles in Corruption : Abuse of Power by America ’ s Progressive Elite : Harris had no particular @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organizations , but the money still came in large , unprecedented sums .
Lawyer Joseph Russoniello represented the church on a wide variety of issues , including the handling of the church abuse scandal .
He served on the Catholic Church ’ s National Review Board ( NRB ) of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops .
The purpose of the NRB was to review Catholic Church abuse cases .
Russoniello was also a partner in the San Francisco law firm Cooley Godward .
Russoniello donated the maximum amount by law to her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law firm added another $ 2,250 .
He also sat on Harris ’ s advisory council when she was San Francisco , district attorney .
Another law firm , Bingham McCutcheon , which handled legal matters for the archdiocese concerning Catholic Charities , donated $ 2,825 , the maximum allowed .
Curiously , Bingham McCutcheon had only donated to two other candidates running for office in San Francisco before , for a total of $ 650 .
As with Russoniello , their support was unusual .
Another law firm , Arguedas , Cassman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time .
They donated $ 4,550 to Harris .
The lawyer in the case , Cristina Arguedas , also served on Kamala Harris ’ s advisory council .
Beyond these law firms , board members of San Francisco Catholic archdiocese–related organizations and their family members donated another $ 50,950 to Harris ’ s campaign .
We don ’ t know if it was 100 % a quid pro quo , but it certainly smells like it because after she took office , the investigations of the abusers stopped as did the cooperation with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was going to release the papers from the archdiocese , Harris refused .
“ District Attorney Harris focuses her efforts on putting child molesters in prison , ” her office claimed .
“ We ’ re not interested in selling out our victims to look good in the paper.
” However , victims and victims advocates wanted the information released .
For example : D.A .
Kamala Harris refused to help the abuse victims in their civil actions .
Interviewed by the liberal Intercept , victims spoke the refusal of Kamala Harris to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that would help them with their cases , or even talk to them when they asked for help : When Piscitelli was asking Kamala Harris for help , his abuser was working at the Saints Peter and Paul Church in San Francisco , a position that placed him in an environment filled with children .
In other words , Harris didn ’ t even care that the man was in another location where he could abuse kids .
Dominic De Lucca , a Burlingame , California , resident who says he was raped @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 12 years old , also said he was shocked that Harris declined to aggressively pursue clergy abuse cases and refused to release the files .
“ I remember Kamala Harris , ” said De Lucca .
“ She didn ’ t want to have any meetings.
” He went on , “ She wanted the public to think this is an issue that happened years ago , that it doesn ’ t happen anymore .
Let ’ s just move on.
” Terence McAteer , a resident of Nevada City , California , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Austin Peter Keegan , an infamous San Francisco priest .
McAteer said he sees no value in Harris ’ s decision to conceal the clergy abuse files , which had been used to indict his abuser but remain secret to this day .
“ Why not tell the story ?
” said McAteer .
“ I have no problem with my file being released .
I don ’ t have any great secrets .
It ’ s already in the newspaper .
I think the whole cloak of secrecy with the Catholic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ survivors of clergy abuse said they believed that Harris had declined to release the files in deference to the Catholic Church , which has historically held sway as a major political force in San Francisco .
The Intercept published a video of its interview of Joey Piscitelli .
The video is at the bottom of this post .
Schweizer reported that “ in April 2010 , a journalist with the San Francisco Weekly asked for the records through California ’ s Public Records Act .
Harris ’ s office denied the request , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could not provide them .
Even after Kamala Harris left office , the records couldn ’ t be shared because they disappeared “ In 2019 , I [ Peter Schwiezer ] requested those records through a California attorney .
The San Francisco district attorney ’ s office responded that they no longer had them in their possession .
Were they destroyed ?
Were they moved somewhere else ?
It remains a disturbing mystery.
” Look , the above story is crucial , especially in the context of the 2020 election .
It is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ covers for liberal candidates .
If Kamala Harris was a Republican , the fact that she threw sexual abuse victims under the bus and seems to have done it for campaign donations would be front-page news in the N.Y. Times and the Washington Post .
It ’ s not like it was a secret , Peter Schweizer ’ s book , Profiles in Corruption : Abuse of Power by America ’ s Progressive Elite was a best seller .
Obviously , I don ’ t agree with Kamala Harris ’ extreme leftist political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worse .
How can any human being ignore the cries of sexual abuse victims ?
They were children for heaven ’ s sake .
When she took over from Terence Hallinan , Kamala Harris had all the information to help the victims , but she did nothing except hide the evidence .
Heck , the Democrats tried to impeach a president for making a phone call they didn ’ t like , but at their convention , they nominate a woman who covered up child molestation , for Vice President .
That ranks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And one last thing .
Most of the information in this post came from Peter Schweizer ’ s book , Profiles in Corruption : Abuse of Power by America ’ s Progressive Elite .
My post doesn ’ t even cover everything the book reveals about Harris , and there ’ s much more .
Via Peter ’ s painstaking research , his tome shows corrupt acts by Joe Biden , Cory Booker , Elizabeth Warren , Bernie Sanders .
Sherrod Brown , Amy Klobuchar , and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I am a big fan of Peter Schweizer ’ s work .
Like much of his previous work , Profiles in Corruption : Abuse of Power by America ’ s Progressive Elite is a must-read for anyone who believes it wrong when those with political power get to operate by a different set of rules than us , regular people .
To be honest , I can ’ t wait for the next one .
The video below is the Intercept interview of Joey Piscitelli : The original article can be found on @ @ @ @

By: Jeff Dunetz
This article originally appeared on The Lid and is reprinted here with permission.
Since the day she was named Joe Biden’s V.P. Kamala Harris (D-CA), the mainstream media has described Kamala Harris as a “moderate” who is so wonderful she practically walks on water. Sadly the media doesn’t vet Democrats, because if they did some vetting of Harris’ history as a prosecutor they would have discovered her disturbing record as the San Francisco DA–She refused to pursue child molestation criminal cases against Catholic priests investigated by her predecessor And when the victims asked her for help with their civil cases against those molesters the victims say she covered up the evidence. Coincidently (if you believe in coincidences) Kamala Harris received substantial campaign donations from people and organizations associated with the accused molesters and their defense.
In his book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite, Peter Schweizer unveils how Harris refused to pursue the case. And also exposes the fact that many of the law firms and lawyers who were representing the archdiocese on a variety of legal matters — including priests that had been identified as possible culprits — gave significant contributions to Harris’s political campaign. Some of them had never given contributions to a race like this before, but they came up with the cash for Kamala Harris.
As Schweizer wrote:
During her decade-and-a-half tenure as a chief prosecutor, Harris would fail to prosecute a single case of priest abuse and her office would strangely hide vital records on abuses that had occurred, despite the protests of victims’ groups. Harris’s predecessor as San Francisco district attorney, Terence Hallinan, was aware of and had prosecuted numerous Catholic priests on sexual misconduct involving children. And he had been gathering case files for even more… Hallinan’s office had launched an investigation and quickly discovered that the San Francisco Archdiocese had extensive internal records concerning complaints going back some seventy-five years. In spring of 2002, Hallinan demanded the church turn them over to his office.
Eventually, the archdiocese turned over the documents, and they were horrific. Supposedly the papers revealed the names of forty current and ex-priests who were accused of sexual abuse. DA Hallinan took the docs and began the process of bringing them to justice,
However, many of the cases were past what had been the statute of limitations. And just as the cases were heating up, the U.S. Supreme Court decision overturned a 1994 California law that retroactively eliminated the statute of limitations for sexual abuse cases. So instead of criminal prosecution for the older cases, Hallinan was forced to change his strategy. He wanted to hold the offenders accountable by releasing the clergy abuse files to the public and aiding the victims in civil cases.
But then Terence Hallinan made a big mistake. He lost his reelection bid to Kamala Harris. Of course, she had a little help from the local Catholic organizations that were freaking out over the prospect for Hallinan releasing the documents and helping the abuse victims. As Peter Schweizer explained in Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite:
Harris had no particular ties to the Catholic Church or Catholic organizations, but the money still came in large, unprecedented sums. Lawyer Joseph Russoniello represented the church on a wide variety of issues, including the handling of the church abuse scandal. He served on the Catholic Church’s National Review Board (NRB) of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. The purpose of the NRB was to review Catholic Church abuse cases. Russoniello was also a partner in the San Francisco law firm Cooley Godward. Russoniello donated the maximum amount by law to her campaign, $1,250, and his law firm added another $2,250. He also sat on Harris’s advisory council when she was San Francisco, district attorney. Another law firm, Bingham McCutcheon, which handled legal matters for the archdiocese concerning Catholic Charities, donated $2,825, the maximum allowed. Curiously, Bingham McCutcheon had only donated to two other candidates running for office in San Francisco before, for a total of $650. As with Russoniello, their support was unusual. Another law firm, Arguedas, Cassman Francisco priest against abuse claims at the time. They donated $4,550 to Harris. The lawyer in the case, Cristina Arguedas, also served on Kamala Harris’s advisory council. Beyond these law firms, board members of San Francisco Catholic archdiocese–related organizations and their family members donated another $50,950 to Harris’s campaign.
We don’t know if it was 100% a quid pro quo, but it certainly smells like it because after she took office, the investigations of the abusers stopped as did the cooperation with the civil suits. While her predecessor was going to release the papers from the archdiocese, Harris refused. “District Attorney Harris focuses her efforts on putting child molesters in prison,” her office claimed. “We’re not interested in selling out our victims to look good in the paper.” However, victims and victims advocates wanted the information released. For example:
They’re full of shit,” said Joey Piscitelli [a victim] and the northwest regional director of Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP), the largest and most active victims group. “You can quote me on that. They’re not protecting the victims.” Rick Simons, an attorney who represented multiple victims of clergy abuse, also attacked Harris’s actions. Hiding the records “shows policy of ignoring the rights of children by one of the largest institutions of the city and county of San Francisco, and in the Bay Area.”
D.A. Kamala Harris refused to help the abuse victims in their civil actions. Interviewed by the liberal Intercept, victims spoke the refusal of Kamala Harris to give them access to the archdiocese files that would help them with their cases, or even talk to them when they asked for help:
“It went from Terence Hallinan going hundred miles an hour, full speed ahead, after the Catholic Church to Kamala Harris doing absolutely nothing and taking it backwards hundred miles an hour,” said Joey Piscitelli, a sexual assault survivor, who a jury found had been molested as a student while attending Salesian College Preparatory, a Catholic high school in Richmond, California. Piscitelli had met with Hallinan’s office to discuss his case and the ongoing investigation into the church. But, he said, when Harris took over, his access to the office was shut off and his requests for clergy abuse files were ignored. Piscitelli resorted to handing out flyers and picketing outside the district attorney’s office on San Francisco’s McAllister Street.
When Piscitelli was asking Kamala Harris for help, his abuser was working at the Saints Peter and Paul Church in San Francisco, a position that placed him in an environment filled with children. In other words, Harris didn’t even care that the man was in another location where he could abuse kids.
Dominic De Lucca, a Burlingame, California, resident who says he was raped by a local priest when he was 12 years old, also said he was shocked that Harris declined to aggressively pursue clergy abuse cases and refused to release the files. “I remember Kamala Harris,” said De Lucca. “She didn’t want to have any meetings.” He went on, “She wanted the public to think this is an issue that happened years ago, that it doesn’t happen anymore. Let’s just move on.” Terence McAteer, a resident of Nevada City, California, says he was raped as a child by Austin Peter Keegan, an infamous San Francisco priest. McAteer said he sees no value in Harris’s decision to conceal the clergy abuse files, which had been used to indict his abuser but remain secret to this day. “Why not tell the story?” said McAteer. “I have no problem with my file being released. I don’t have any great secrets. It’s already in the newspaper. I think the whole cloak of secrecy with the Catholic Church needs to be exposed.” Several survivors of clergy abuse said they believed that Harris had declined to release the files in deference to the Catholic Church, which has historically held sway as a major political force in San Francisco.
The Intercept published a video of its interview of Joey Piscitelli. The video is at the bottom of this post.
Schweizer reported that “in April 2010, a journalist with the San Francisco Weekly asked for the records through California’s Public Records Act. Harris’s office denied the request, offering conflicting explanations as to why they could not provide them.
Even after Kamala Harris left office, the records couldn’t be shared because they disappeared “In 2019, I [Peter Schwiezer] requested those records through a California attorney. The San Francisco district attorney’s office responded that they no longer had them in their possession. Were they destroyed? Were they moved somewhere else? It remains a disturbing mystery.”
Look, the above story is crucial, especially in the context of the 2020 election.
It is another example of how the mainstream media covers for liberal candidates. If Kamala Harris was a Republican, the fact that she threw sexual abuse victims under the bus and seems to have done it for campaign donations would be front-page news in the N.Y. Times and the Washington Post. It’s not like it was a secret, Peter Schweizer’s book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite was a best seller.
Obviously, I don’t agree with Kamala Harris’ extreme leftist political positions, But IMHO this is much worse. How can any human being ignore the cries of sexual abuse victims? They were children for heaven’s sake. When she took over from Terence Hallinan, Kamala Harris had all the information to help the victims, but she did nothing except hide the evidence. Heck, the Democrats tried to impeach a president for making a phone call they didn’t like, but at their convention, they nominate a woman who covered up child molestation, for Vice President. That ranks only slightly higher than the molesters themselves.
And one last thing. Most of the information in this post came from Peter Schweizer’s book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite. My post doesn’t even cover everything the book reveals about Harris, and there’s much more. Via Peter’s painstaking research, his tome shows corrupt acts by Joe Biden, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders. Sherrod Brown, Amy Klobuchar, and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti.
Regular readers of this site know I am a big fan of Peter Schweizer’s work. Like much of his previous work, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite is a must-read for anyone who believes it wrong when those with political power get to operate by a different set of rules than us, regular people. To be honest, I can’t wait for the next one.
The video below is the Intercept interview of Joey Piscitelli:
The original article can be found on The Lid here.


clashdaily--2020-08-19--WATCH: Mail-In Ballot Problems Explained In Words Even Alyssa Milano Could Understand

Look very carefully at these two ballots .
What do you notice about them ?
Not so very long ago , Democrats pretended to be worried about the integrity of our elections being tampered with by a few thousand dollars of Russian Facebook Ads .
This was weird , since their ‘ Lightbringer ’ Obama himself assured us that the elections were NOT in any danger of being hacked by Russians .
Now , whenever somebody points out that there are several known potential points of failure .
For some examples , ballots could either fail to arrive at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ duplicate ballot could arrive at an old address or even someone else ’ s home , and a dummy test put on by a Philadelphia Media outlet showed an alarmingly high failure rate with only 200 envelopes .
That ’ s just the human error side of things .
Trending : This Republican Campaign Ad Might Just Be The Democrats ’ Kryptonite ( VIDEO ) This video shows a more serious and egregious potential failure point than any of those .
One that is far less innocuous .
Do you believe in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we don ’ t have that with this Mass Mailing system .
The letter carrier will know , with some degree of certainty , whether they are holding a Trump vote or a Biden vote .
We ’ ve already seen individual examples of corrupt letter carriers convicted of messing with ballots… this year .
Add in the motive of self-interest ( Democrats are pledging to throw money at the postal service and are framing themselves as their great defenders ) together with the ability to act without being seen and you suddenly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and vote manipulation isn ’ t just possible but it ’ s probable .
Having the ballots clearly marked with an R or a D only makes it that much worse .
And the Democrats pretend that REPUBLICANS are trying to unfairly manipulate the vote ?
They ’ re not even committed to the Secret Ballot !

Look very carefully at these two ballots. What do you notice about them?
Not so very long ago, Democrats pretended to be worried about the integrity of our elections being tampered with by a few thousand dollars of Russian Facebook Ads. This was weird, since their ‘Lightbringer’ Obama himself assured us that the elections were NOT in any danger of being hacked by Russians.
Now, whenever somebody points out that there are several known potential points of failure. For some examples, ballots could either fail to arrive at the right person’s home, a duplicate ballot could arrive at an old address or even someone else’s home, and a dummy test put on by a Philadelphia Media outlet showed an alarmingly high failure rate with only 200 envelopes.
That’s just the human error side of things.
This video shows a more serious and egregious potential failure point than any of those. One that is far less innocuous.
This is why we vote in person.
What could possibly go wrong..
pic.twitter.com/paVpM3t1h5 — ?The Sly SilverFox? (@silver_fox9) August 18, 2020
Do you believe in the importance of the Secret Ballot?
Because we don’t have that with this Mass Mailing system.
The letter carrier will know, with some degree of certainty, whether they are holding a Trump vote or a Biden vote.
We’ve already seen individual examples of corrupt letter carriers convicted of messing with ballots… this year.
Add in the motive of self-interest (Democrats are pledging to throw money at the postal service and are framing themselves as their great defenders) together with the ability to act without being seen and you suddenly have a dangerously incentivized scenario where disenfranchisement and vote manipulation isn’t just possible but it’s probable.
Having the ballots clearly marked with an R or a D only makes it that much worse.
And the Democrats pretend that REPUBLICANS are trying to unfairly manipulate the vote?
They’re not even committed to the Secret Ballot!


clashdaily--2020-08-19--STILL WINNING: Trump Upstages DNC Snorefest With This BIG Symbolic Pardon

The Democrats aren ’ t even trying to hide that they are pulling out every dirty trick in the book .
But when THEY went low , Trump went HIGH .
The Democrats are working very hard to cook up a narrative that Trump wants to cheat his way through the next election .
This , of course , is a deflection .
Trending : This Republican Campaign Ad Might Just Be The Democrats ’ Kryptonite ( VIDEO ) It serves to distract from their own handiwork — both in the criminal interference with the Trump administration by top-tier Obama-Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their way into power through dirty tricks if they can ’ t win legitimately .
( Between the 600 election lawyers the DNC has hired and their fight to keep voter rolls bloated and unaccountable , there is enough latitude for chicanery that it could make Broward County Florida look like a well-oiled machine by comparison . )
Their tactic also puts Trump on the defensive .
The media machine cranks up accusations that he has to deflect and disprove .
During the Republican Convention , Pelosi will be playing political games by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Congress to deal with the ‘ Constitutional crisis ’ of Mass Mailings and the Post Office .
None of this is a coincidence .
The left WANTS the public to think that Trump is somehow trying to cheat the public out of their right to vote .
That orchestrated narrative he ’ s fighting against is what makes Trump ’ s gesture here so elegant .
Here is his speech in its entirety .
And one brief segment of it .
Trump signaled his support and celebration of the hard-fought right to vote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment ! )
by formally issuing a posthumous pardon of Susan B Anthony .
This reframes Trump as someone who celebrates the vote of the individual citizen and the place of honor that voting has among our civic institutions and traditions .
It will give a backdrop against which Trump can push back on the Democrats ’ push to make voting MORE complicated and less transparent , more vulnerable to corruption , and could ultimately cause the public to have less confidence in the authenticity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thought the Democrats handled losses in 2000 and 2016 badly , just wait until we see their response if Trump gets another mandate in November .
You can expect that HELL will break loose .
And no matter who wins , you can expect a long and drawn-out recount to put the entire process into disrepute .
Many of our readers will be too young to remember ‘ selected not elected ’ .
But you can be sure that if Trump wins again , the Democrats will be trotting out THAT old lie @ @ @ @ @ @ @

The Democrats aren’t even trying to hide that they are pulling out every dirty trick in the book. But when THEY went low, Trump went HIGH.
This symbolic gesture
The Democrats are working very hard to cook up a narrative that Trump wants to cheat his way through the next election.
This, of course, is a deflection.
It serves to distract from their own handiwork — both in the criminal interference with the Trump administration by top-tier Obama-Biden officials and in their plans to scheme their way into power through dirty tricks if they can’t win legitimately. (Between the 600 election lawyers the DNC has hired and their fight to keep voter rolls bloated and unaccountable, there is enough latitude for chicanery that it could make Broward County Florida look like a well-oiled machine by comparison.)
Their tactic also puts Trump on the defensive. The media machine cranks up accusations that he has to deflect and disprove. During the Republican Convention, Pelosi will be playing political games by calling an ‘urgent’ meeting of Congress to deal with the ‘Constitutional crisis’ of Mass Mailings and the Post Office.
None of this is a coincidence. The left WANTS the public to think that Trump is somehow trying to cheat the public out of their right to vote.
That orchestrated narrative he’s fighting against is what makes Trump’s gesture here so elegant.
100 years ago today, the #19thAmendment was ratified, securing the right to vote for American women. Today, @POTUS signed a proclamation recognizing this historic anniversary & we celebrate the countless contributions of women throughout our Nation’s history. #SuffrageMonth pic.twitter.com/QyoiBgYh5z — Melania Trump (@FLOTUS) August 18, 2020
Here is his speech in its entirety.
And one brief segment of it.
Today, a record-breaking 131 women are serving in Congress. Nearly 70 million women vote in elections. More than 11 million women own successful businesses. "In other words, women dominate the United States!" pic.twitter.com/qlQDdLOXgh — The White House (@WhiteHouse) August 18, 2020
Trump signaled his support and celebration of the hard-fought right to vote and showed his support (on the 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment!) by formally issuing a posthumous pardon of Susan B Anthony.
This reframes Trump as someone who celebrates the vote of the individual citizen and the place of honor that voting has among our civic institutions and traditions.
It will give a backdrop against which Trump can push back on the Democrats’ push to make voting MORE complicated and less transparent, more vulnerable to corruption, and could ultimately cause the public to have less confidence in the authenticity of a final result.
If you thought the Democrats handled losses in 2000 and 2016 badly, just wait until we see their response if Trump gets another mandate in November. You can expect that HELL will break loose.
And no matter who wins, you can expect a long and drawn-out recount to put the entire process into disrepute.
Many of our readers will be too young to remember ‘selected not elected’. But you can be sure that if Trump wins again, the Democrats will be trotting out THAT old lie in their next batch of resistance.


clashdaily--2020-08-19--SQUAD RULES: AOC Seconds Nomination Of BERNIE For President At The End Of Her Speech–Here’s The 411

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , despite her personal popularity in her party , was given table scraps in the speeches .
And she used her short minute to demagogue and nominate… Bolshevik Bernie .
Seeing her back Bernie makes perfect sense .
After all , it was as recently as January that Occasional-Cortex groused that only in America would she and Biden even be in the same party .
If she had her way , it wouldn ’ t be long before July 4th was replaced by Communist “ May Day ” celebrations .
Here she is nominating Breadline Bernie .
Trending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Be The Democrats ’ Kryptonite ( VIDEO ) Well , that ’ s a fine “ how do you do ” isn ’ t it ?
Seems like a slap across Old Joe ’ s tired and confused face , doesn ’ t it ?
Actually , there ’ s a reason that she did it .
And it isn ’ t the shiv between his ribs that it might seem at first glance .
She ’ s still committed to pushing her party ’ s agenda ( now that the donkey party @ @ @ @ @ @ @ un ) Democratic Socialists ) and if that means backing a ventriloquist dummy until such time as the White House is secured , then so be it .
There were some boring procedural reasons she , or somebody , had to second Bernie ’ s nomination since he met the threshold number of delegates .
But ask yourself — since we ’ ve already seen what she is capable of in putting a gun to the head of her own party , would AOC staging a public muntiny against her party have really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been more bare-knuckle politics-as-usual ?
Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez tweeted out why she did that–she was asked to .
She explains in a tweet that the convention rules require it .
She wrote , “ If you were confused , no worries !
Convention rules require roll call & nominations for every candidate that passes the delegate threshold .
I was asked to 2nd the nom for Sen. Sanders for roll call .
I extend my deepest congratulations to @ JoeBiden – let ’ s go win in November.
” Here she is saying the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there is no difference between ‘ reclaiming OUR democracy ’ and ‘ getting our greedy mitts on the levers of power ’ .
What this REALLY does is serve as a reminder that Bernie bragged about successfully dragging Biden hard to the left .
His appointment of Kamala Harris as his Veep is proof of that .
How power-hungry are these Democrats ?
Are they a serious threat to the freedom of an ordinary citizen ?
It only takes a few minutes ’ worth of Congressional Hearings by the very unorthodox rules @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the view of politics this crop of Democrats plays under is nothing short of naked power flexed against their enemies — whether that means political enemies like Trump ( see Schiff and Nadler ’ s impeachment attempt ) , threats to their friends ( like Barr ) , political scapegoats ( like ICE ) , or entities they plan to bully ( like the Banks who were scared off of lending money to ICE for fear of Congressional backlash after AOC ’ s open threats ) .

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, despite her personal popularity in her party, was given table scraps in the speeches. And she used her short minute to demagogue and nominate… Bolshevik Bernie.
Seeing her back Bernie makes perfect sense. After all, it was as recently as January that Occasional-Cortex groused that only in America would she and Biden even be in the same party. If she had her way, it wouldn’t be long before July 4th was replaced by Communist “May Day” celebrations.
Here she is nominating Breadline Bernie.
Well, that’s a fine “how do you do” isn’t it? Seems like a slap across Old Joe’s tired and confused face, doesn’t it?
Actually, there’s a reason that she did it. And it isn’t the shiv between his ribs that it might seem at first glance.
She’s still committed to pushing her party’s agenda (now that the donkey party has been successfully hijacked by the (un)Democratic Socialists) and if that means backing a ventriloquist dummy until such time as the White House is secured, then so be it.
There were some boring procedural reasons she, or somebody, had to second Bernie’s nomination since he met the threshold number of delegates.
But ask yourself — since we’ve already seen what she is capable of in putting a gun to the head of her own party, would AOC staging a public muntiny against her party have really surprised anyone? Or would it have been more bare-knuckle politics-as-usual?
Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez tweeted out why she did that–she was asked to. She explains in a tweet that the convention rules require it. She wrote, “If you were confused, no worries! Convention rules require roll call & nominations for every candidate that passes the delegate threshold. I was asked to 2nd the nom for Sen. Sanders for roll call. I extend my deepest congratulations to @JoeBiden – let’s go win in November.”
If you were confused, no worries! Convention rules require roll call & nominations for every candidate that passes the delegate threshold. I was asked to 2nd the nom for Sen. Sanders for roll call. I extend my deepest congratulations to @JoeBiden – let’s go win in November. ?? https://t.co/uI92P3UfLn — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) August 19, 2020
Here she is saying the quiet part out loud.
Congratulations, @JoeBiden – I deeply look forward to fighting for our future together and reclaiming our democracy in November. Thank you @DemConvention for having me deliver Sen. Sanders’ roll call nomination speech. It’s been an absolute honor.#NotMeUs & #Biden2020 ?? https://t.co/dJN1FUQfix — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) August 19, 2020
For Democrats, there is no difference between ‘reclaiming OUR democracy’ and ‘getting our greedy mitts on the levers of power’.
What this REALLY does is serve as a reminder that Bernie bragged about successfully dragging Biden hard to the left. His appointment of Kamala Harris as his Veep is proof of that.
How power-hungry are these Democrats? Are they a serious threat to the freedom of an ordinary citizen?
It only takes a few minutes’ worth of Congressional Hearings by the very unorthodox rules team Pelosi played by to see that the view of politics this crop of Democrats plays under is nothing short of naked power flexed against their enemies — whether that means political enemies like Trump (see Schiff and Nadler’s impeachment attempt), threats to their friends (like Barr), political scapegoats (like ICE), or entities they plan to bully (like the Banks who were scared off of lending money to ICE for fear of Congressional backlash after AOC’s open threats).


Democrats Peddling Fear

“ Fear is an insidious and deadly thing .
It can warp judgment , freeze reflexes , breed mistakes .
Worse , it ’ s contagious.
” These insightful words were said by Hollywood legend , actor Jimmy Stewart .
Fear can not drive a person or nation to greatness .
The apostle Paul wrote in 2 Timothy 1:7 , “ For God has not given us a spirit of fear , but of power and of love and of a sound mind.
” Fear , though , seems to be the driver for the Democrats as the 2020 campaign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democratic National Convention , former first lady Michelle Obama wowed the liberal press with her recorded speech .
Chris Cillizza of CNN called it “ powerful ” opining that it “ hit at the core of what I believe is the most glaring personality flaw in President Donald Trump : A complete lack of empathy.
” Jon Karl , not wanting to be outdone in the “ kissing up ” department , tweeted , “ And there you have the best speech ever given at a virtual convention … and I doubt it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it always seems to do , eludes left-wing pundits posing as reporters .
Her speech was a dark , dismal diatribe that disingenuously attacked the character of President Trump and castigated Americans for electing him in 2016 .
Trending : This Republican Campaign Ad Might Just Be The Democrats ’ Kryptonite ( VIDEO ) She lied about children being torn “ from their families and thrown into cages.
” She knows the truth .
Those “ cages ” were built and used during her husband and Biden ’ s administration .
Even the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attacked those who don ’ t buy into the “ wearing a mask ” concept and insinuated that Trump and his supporters lack empathy .
There ’ s a lot of arrogant condescension in her words and , to be honest , I ’ m not sure I am , nor are most Americans , eager to lectured about empathy by those who don ’ t care about regular people with regular jobs .
Someone whose vacation home costs $ 11.25 million might want to pull back a bit on “ empathy ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that part of her speech was , the most troubling part came later .
The former first lady painted an ugly picture of America .
She ran down a list of what she believes to be terrible things about our country .
For Michelle Obama , the last four years have been a nightmare .
She ’ s claimed to be suffering from a “ low-grade depression ” due to the Trump Administration .
Her speech concluded that under President Trump “ this is the America that is on display for the next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ underperforming not simply on matters of policy but on matters of character .
And that ’ s not just disappointing ; it ’ s downright infuriating.
” Again , she can ’ t hide her condescending , elitist attitude .
She then gets to her fearmongering .
“ So , if you take one thing from my words tonight , it is this : if you think things can not possibly get worse , trust me , they can ; and they will if we don ’ t make a change in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrats , and the entire Left-wing , this country is not a great country .
It is not a land of opportunity .
It does not matter that unemployment among African Americans , women , and Hispanics was lower than it had ever been before during the Trump economy .
It does not matter to them that more people had more money than they ’ d had during the Obama administration .
What matters is that they get back into power .
They do not care about the people or who suffers along @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any other Democrat speaks of empathy , they don ’ t mean it .
They did not mention one time , on the first night of their virtual convention , the riots across several American cities in which many were killed .
Obama did not demonstrate an ounce of empathy to law enforcement officers who have to deal daily with dangerous and deadly situations .
Obama didn ’ t really make a positive case for Joe Biden and didn ’ t mention Kamala Harris at all .
She simply went on the attack @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ going high.
” Clearly , she is not proud of America now .
By supporting Biden , Obama and the other Democrats are wanting more riots and less police .
They want more racial tension and less coming together .
They want more unemployment and less money in our pockets .
They support more lockdowns and fewer kids in school .
They want more masks and less freedom .
Most of all , they want more fear .
Fear will not bring us back from the Chinese virus and the economic challenges @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ever , it is time to Make America Great Again .

“Fear is an insidious and deadly thing. It can warp judgment, freeze reflexes, breed mistakes. Worse, it’s contagious.” These insightful words were said by Hollywood legend, actor Jimmy Stewart. Fear cannot drive a person or nation to greatness. The apostle Paul wrote in 2 Timothy 1:7, “For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.”
Fear, though, seems to be the driver for the Democrats as the 2020 campaign officially kicks off. At the virtual Democratic National Convention, former first lady Michelle Obama wowed the liberal press with her recorded speech.
Chris Cillizza of CNN called it “powerful” opining that it “hit at the core of what I believe is the most glaring personality flaw in President Donald Trump: A complete lack of empathy.” Jon Karl, not wanting to be outdone in the “kissing up” department, tweeted, “And there you have the best speech ever given at a virtual convention … and I doubt it will be topped.”
Truth, as it always seems to do, eludes left-wing pundits posing as reporters. Her speech was a dark, dismal diatribe that disingenuously attacked the character of President Trump and castigated Americans for electing him in 2016.
She lied about children being torn “from their families and thrown into cages.” She knows the truth. Those “cages” were built and used during her husband and Biden’s administration. Even the AP called out this lie.
She attacked those who don’t buy into the “wearing a mask” concept and insinuated that Trump and his supporters lack empathy.
There’s a lot of arrogant condescension in her words and, to be honest, I’m not sure I am, nor are most Americans, eager to lectured about empathy by those who don’t care about regular people with regular jobs. Someone whose vacation home costs $11.25 million might want to pull back a bit on “empathy” demands.
As dripping with arrogance as that part of her speech was, the most troubling part came later. The former first lady painted an ugly picture of America. She ran down a list of what she believes to be terrible things about our country.
For Michelle Obama, the last four years have been a nightmare. She’s claimed to be suffering from a “low-grade depression” due to the Trump Administration.
Her speech concluded that under President Trump “this is the America that is on display for the next generation. A nation that’s underperforming not simply on matters of policy but on matters of character. And that’s not just disappointing; it’s downright infuriating.”
Again, she can’t hide her condescending, elitist attitude. She then gets to her fearmongering. “So, if you take one thing from my words tonight, it is this: if you think things cannot possibly get worse, trust me, they can; and they will if we don’t make a change in this election.”
For Michelle Obama, the Democrats, and the entire Left-wing, this country is not a great country. It is not a land of opportunity. It does not matter that unemployment among African Americans, women, and Hispanics was lower than it had ever been before during the Trump economy. It does not matter to them that more people had more money than they’d had during the Obama administration. What matters is that they get back into power. They do not care about the people or who suffers along the way.
When Michelle Obama or any other Democrat speaks of empathy, they don’t mean it. They did not mention one time, on the first night of their virtual convention, the riots across several American cities in which many were killed.
Obama did not demonstrate an ounce of empathy to law enforcement officers who have to deal daily with dangerous and deadly situations.
Obama didn’t really make a positive case for Joe Biden and didn’t mention Kamala Harris at all. She simply went on the attack. I guess that’s called “going high.” Clearly, she is not proud of America now.
By supporting Biden, Obama and the other Democrats are wanting more riots and less police. They want more racial tension and less coming together. They want more unemployment and less money in our pockets. They support more lockdowns and fewer kids in school. They want more masks and less freedom. Most of all, they want more fear.
Fear will not bring us back from the Chinese virus and the economic challenges that lie ahead. Now more than ever, it is time to Make America Great Again.


clashdaily--2020-08-19--America The Beautiful Under Attack: Can Jesus Save Us?

I am sending you out like sheep among wolves .
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves .
Over the last few months , Americans have had to endure an extraordinarily divisive impeachment process , a disease sent to us from a careless country , and riots in our major cities .
In few periods of our national history has so much turmoil been evident .
People are fleeing our major cities , because of weak and ineffective governmental authorities .
Whose only reply is to blame us and not listen to why the exodus is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Americans unemployed and no solution for the future .
Divisiveness is so rampant families are turning on each other .
Our national media reports only the salacious , despite the cry for objective journalism .
Our sports leagues have taken up political stances because they are fashionable and are suffering a backlash causing millions to tune out .
In our nation , all seems like a chapter out of Alice in Wonderland .
Domestic terrorists are desiring to defund the police and our civil authorities are complying .
Despite the cry from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only not do this , but to add more .
The approval ratings of our Congress is at a historical low , below twenty percent .
Yet Congress will not hear the cry to behave .
I hear and see other things in America , that reflect the real values of everyday Americans .
I see first responders saving lives .
I see our trained police professionally comforting those in distress .
I see people rescue others , despite their own peril .
I see a country whose people will be the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need help .
I see people going to Haiti after a horrendous earthquake .
Time and again American ’ s help out those in need .
Trending : This Republican Campaign Ad Might Just Be The Democrats ’ Kryptonite ( VIDEO ) I also see most Americans defying how they are portrayed in the national media .
I have seen the deplorables in distant rural valleys helping veterans .
I am seeing the historic effort by our country to develop a vaccine to rid a disease that is threatening the world ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , not the one shown by our national media or the anarchists who want us to believe differently .
I am sure Jesus is seeing this as well .
Jesus doesn ’ t want divisiveness .
More importantly , Jesus doesn ’ t want us to listen to those who seek to divide .
Rather , Jesus wants us to be wary of these wolves .
Jesus has given us wise advice when we encounter these who seek our destruction .
To be shrewd and innocent .
In other words , know the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same time , retain our Christian values and don ’ t meet evil with evil .
Paul further explains this advice when he wrote to us two millenniums ago and said ; I urge you , brothers and sisters , to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned .
Keep away from them .
( Romans 16:17 ) Another wise piece of Christian advice from the Bible .
Make no doubt about what is going on .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of us to be in despair .
They want us to think less of our neighbors and to believe they are the real voice .
They say they are here to help , but look closely .
They throw stones , loot , and set fires .
These are the wolves Jesus is telling us about .
The wolves want us to believe we want less police .
Imagine that , the voice of evil wants us to have less police .
And we see what that has brought , in the last @ @ @ @ @ @ @ acceleration in the death of black lives .
The very lives these wolves tell us they are protecting .
This is where being shrewd comes in .
As Americans , we will answer any call for help it is our national ethos .
In turn , the wolves are using this knowledge and taking advantage of us .
At the same time , Jesus wants us to be innocent as doves .
Simply , don ’ t fight evil with evil .
We are to build up and not seek to destroy .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ be beacons of goodness .
To help our neighbors even more than ever .
To act quickly to aid the less fortunate .
To lend an ear to those who need to be heard .
There will always be wolves .
They existed two thousand years ago , and they will exist two thousand years from now .
Instead of listening to those who seek to divide , we should listen to Jesus ’ s advice .
We should listen to the very many American voices who don ’ t want inane thoughts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a great nation .
We will always be the first to send help when other lands suffer disaster .
We will always be a nation that sends its doctors to stamp out diseases in faraway lands .
When typhoons hit , our relief agencies will be some of the first on the ground .
And we are also a people that strive to fix our wrongs .
The vast majority of Americans believe in fixing injustice .
They will always bend down to lift up the weak .
We will always defend the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the wolves and to always continue to good .
Jesus doesn ’ t want us to engage with the wolves .
The only real harm they can do is to divide us .
Dr. Bruce L Hartman , a former Fortune 500 CFO , is the author of Jesus & Co. , Your Faith Has Made You Well and Spend A Year With Jesus .
Dr. Hartman ’ s website , www.brucelhartman.com.
, contains inspirational messages , podcasts and videos to help Christians in their daily lives .
After a successful career in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his Doctorate in Ministry .
He is now an active Christian writer ; both in writing books and a frequent contributor of Christian articles .
Dr. Hartman is a regular guest on Christian radio throughout the nation .

I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
Matthew 10:16
Over the last few months, Americans have had to endure an extraordinarily divisive impeachment process, a disease sent to us from a careless country, and riots in our major cities. In few periods of our national history has so much turmoil been evident.
People are fleeing our major cities, because of weak and ineffective governmental authorities. Whose only reply is to blame us and not listen to why the exodus is happening. Congress leaves town with millions of Americans unemployed and no solution for the future. Divisiveness is so rampant families are turning on each other. Our national media reports only the salacious, despite the cry for objective journalism. Our sports leagues have taken up political stances because they are fashionable and are suffering a backlash causing millions to tune out.
In our nation, all seems like a chapter out of Alice in Wonderland. Domestic terrorists are desiring to defund the police and our civil authorities are complying. Despite the cry from eighty percent of all Americans to not only not do this, but to add more. The approval ratings of our Congress is at a historical low, below twenty percent. Yet Congress will not hear the cry to behave.
I hear and see other things in America, that reflect the real values of everyday Americans. I see first responders saving lives. I see our trained police professionally comforting those in distress. I see people rescue others, despite their own peril. I see a country whose people will be the first to lend a hand when other countries need help. I see people going to Haiti after a horrendous earthquake. Time and again American’s help out those in need.
I also see most Americans defying how they are portrayed in the national media. I have seen the deplorables in distant rural valleys helping veterans. I am seeing the historic effort by our country to develop a vaccine to rid a disease that is threatening the world’s health. This is the real America, not the one shown by our national media or the anarchists who want us to believe differently.
I am sure Jesus is seeing this as well. Jesus doesn’t want divisiveness. More importantly, Jesus doesn’t want us to listen to those who seek to divide. Rather, Jesus wants us to be wary of these wolves. Jesus has given us wise advice when we encounter these who seek our destruction. To be shrewd and innocent. In other words, know the wolves and be careful. And at the same time, retain our Christian values and don’t meet evil with evil.
Paul further explains this advice when he wrote to us two millenniums ago and said; I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them. (Romans 16:17) Another wise piece of Christian advice from the Bible.
Make no doubt about what is going on. The wolves have arrived and want all of us to be in despair. They want us to think less of our neighbors and to believe they are the real voice. They say they are here to help, but look closely. They throw stones, loot, and set fires. These are the wolves Jesus is telling us about.
The wolves want us to believe we want less police. Imagine that, the voice of evil wants us to have less police. And we see what that has brought, in the last few weeks, there has been an acceleration in the death of black lives. The very lives these wolves tell us they are protecting. This is where being shrewd comes in. As Americans, we will answer any call for help it is our national ethos. In turn, the wolves are using this knowledge and taking advantage of us.
At the same time, Jesus wants us to be innocent as doves. Simply, don’t fight evil with evil. We are to build up and not seek to destroy. Our goal should be to continue to be beacons of goodness. To help our neighbors even more than ever. To act quickly to aid the less fortunate. To lend an ear to those who need to be heard.
There will always be wolves. They existed two thousand years ago, and they will exist two thousand years from now. Instead of listening to those who seek to divide, we should listen to Jesus’s advice. We should listen to the very many American voices who don’t want inane thoughts like defunding the police.
We are a great nation. We will always be the first to send help when other lands suffer disaster. We will always be a nation that sends its doctors to stamp out diseases in faraway lands. When typhoons hit, our relief agencies will be some of the first on the ground.
And we are also a people that strive to fix our wrongs. The vast majority of Americans believe in fixing injustice. They will always bend down to lift up the weak. We will always defend the helpless.
All Jesus asks, avoid the wolves and to always continue to good. Jesus doesn’t want us to engage with the wolves. The only real harm they can do is to divide us.
Dr. Bruce L Hartman, a former Fortune 500 CFO, is the author of Jesus & Co., Your Faith Has Made You Well and Spend A Year With Jesus. Dr. Hartman’s website, www.brucelhartman.com., contains inspirational messages, podcasts and videos to help Christians in their daily lives.
After a successful career in the business world, Dr. Hartman obtained his Doctorate in Ministry. He is now an active Christian writer; both in writing books and a frequent contributor of Christian articles. Dr. Hartman is a regular guest on Christian radio throughout the nation.


clashdaily--2020-08-18--REVEALED: Photos Of Smiling Bill Clinton Getting A Massage From One Of Epstein’s Victims

This is inconvenient as Bill is scheduled to speak at the Democratic National Convention on Tuesday night .
On Tuesday , the Daily Mail published never-before-seen photos of former President Bill Clinton getting a neck massage from the most vocal of Epstein ’ s victims .
The photo is from a 2002 Clinton Foundation trip to Africa for humanitarian reasons that Clinton took with Jeffrey Epstein , Ghislaine Maxwell , and victim , Chauntae Davies , as well as some celebrities on the infamous “ Lolita Express ” –the private jet belonging to Epstein .
Davies was 22 at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 56 years old .
Davies has testified that she was raped several times by Jeffrey Epstein after being recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell .
Trending : This Republican Campaign Ad Might Just Be The Democrats ’ Kryptonite ( VIDEO ) Clinton , who was a frequent flyer on the jet , was complaining of a stiff neck after falling asleep during the flight .
As they waited in an airport in Portugal for the plane to be refueled , Maxwell suggested that Davies , who was a massage therapist , give him a massage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 56 , had complained of having a stiff neck after falling asleep on Epstein ’ s infamous private jet , nicknamed The Lolita Express , while on a humanitarian trip with the pedophile to Africa in September of 2002 .
Maxwell , who is now in prison on sex trafficking charges , repeatedly encouraged Davies to give Clinton a massage while the group was refueling at a small airport in Portugal after flying in from New York .
After Maxwell ’ s insistence , Clinton asked the twenty-something : ‘ Would you mind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is very awkward for the former President who has been repeatedly accused of sexual assault and rape for decades but is still revered by the left .
Even the # MeToo movement–which went after Brett Kavanaugh for alleged groping when he was in high school–couldn ’ t cancel Bill Clinton for the rape of Juanita Broaddrick which had far more credible evidence .
Must be nice to be on the left–you can get away with anything .
Davies spoke about the photos and said that although she had an awkward moment , Clinton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ awkward moment was when she asked the 42nd President , “ I ’ ve got a bad angle , would you mind getting on your knees ?
” She said that although Clinton turned red , they all laughed about it .
Davies , now in her early 40s , said of the massage pictures : ‘ Although the image looks bizarre , President Clinton was a perfect gentleman during the trip and I saw absolutely no foul play involving him.
’ She explained the massage happened when ‘ we had a stop-over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we were in the terminal the ex-President was complaining of stiffness from falling asleep in his chair .
Also on the 5-day humanitarian trip were actors Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker .
The group traveled to Ghana , Nigeria , Rwanda , Mozambique , and South Africa to discuss economic development on the continent , along with the fight against HIV and AIDS as a part of the Clinton Foundation .
The question is–how many more hidden photos of Clinton in Epstein ’ s circles are there , and what precisely do they @ @

This is inconvenient as Bill is scheduled to speak at the Democratic National Convention on Tuesday night.
On Tuesday, the Daily Mail published never-before-seen photos of former President Bill Clinton getting a neck massage from the most vocal of Epstein’s victims.
The photo is from a 2002 Clinton Foundation trip to Africa for humanitarian reasons that Clinton took with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and victim, Chauntae Davies, as well as some celebrities on the infamous “Lolita Express”–the private jet belonging to Epstein. Davies was 22 at the time, while the former President was 56 years old.
Davies has testified that she was raped several times by Jeffrey Epstein after being recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell.
Clinton, who was a frequent flyer on the jet, was complaining of a stiff neck after falling asleep during the flight. As they waited in an airport in Portugal for the plane to be refueled, Maxwell suggested that Davies, who was a massage therapist, give him a massage. Davis complied.
Clinton, then 56, had complained of having a stiff neck after falling asleep on Epstein’s infamous private jet, nicknamed The Lolita Express, while on a humanitarian trip with the pedophile to Africa in September of 2002. Maxwell, who is now in prison on sex trafficking charges, repeatedly encouraged Davies to give Clinton a massage while the group was refueling at a small airport in Portugal after flying in from New York. After Maxwell’s insistence, Clinton asked the twenty-something: ‘Would you mind giving it a crack?’
New photos just came out with Epstein trafficking victim with Bill Clinton tonight's speaker at the DNC. "Bill Clinton leans back and smiles while receiving neck massage from Epstein victim" pic.twitter.com/qETzGvs9pQ — Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) August 18, 2020
This is very awkward for the former President who has been repeatedly accused of sexual assault and rape for decades but is still revered by the left. Even the #MeToo movement–which went after Brett Kavanaugh for alleged groping when he was in high school–couldn’t cancel Bill Clinton for the rape of Juanita Broaddrick which had far more credible evidence.
Must be nice to be on the left–you can get away with anything.
Davies spoke about the photos and said that although she had an awkward moment, Clinton was “a perfect gentleman.” The awkward moment was when she asked the 42nd President, “I’ve got a bad angle, would you mind getting on your knees?” She said that although Clinton turned red, they all laughed about it.
Davies, now in her early 40s, said of the massage pictures: ‘Although the image looks bizarre, President Clinton was a perfect gentleman during the trip and I saw absolutely no foul play involving him.’ She explained the massage happened when ‘we had a stop-over for the jet to refuel and while we were in the terminal the ex-President was complaining of stiffness from falling asleep in his chair. Source: Daily Mail
Also on the 5-day humanitarian trip were actors Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker. The group traveled to Ghana, Nigeria, Rwanda, Mozambique, and South Africa to discuss economic development on the continent, along with the fight against HIV and AIDS as a part of the Clinton Foundation.
The question is–how many more hidden photos of Clinton in Epstein’s circles are there, and what precisely do they contain?


clashdaily--2020-08-19--Here’s 3 Reasons Why The Case Against The George Floyd ‘Killer’ Cops Might Not Be A Slamdunk

The entire country was rocked by the almost 9-minute video–but what about justice ?
When I first saw that terrible viral video of the death of George Floyd while in police custody , I was just as disturbed , outraged , and horrified as the activists shouting about police brutality–but I couldn ’ t say with certainty that it was motivated by racism .
Nobody could claim that definitively even though they did just that on the left .
The video did , however , seem to be a clear case of police brutality out in broad daylight .
At @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I ’ m not a law enforcement officer .
After the horror subsided a bit , one thing really started to bother me–how would these police officers get a fair trial ?
We pride ourselves on a justice system predicated on fairness and that it ideally looks at “ just the facts ” of each case .
We know our system doesn ’ t always live up to those ideals , but even when it does seem cut-and-dry , a full investigation needs to be done to bring forward the facts that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : REVEALED : Photos Of Smiling Bill Clinton Getting A Massage From One Of Epstein ’ s Victims The details came out that Floyd was being held down because of a counterfeit $ 20 bill .
It seemed like such an insignificant crime to lose a life over , especially since so many people are struggling due to ongoing COVID-19 lockdowns all over the world .
The outrage grew and spread , and cities began to burn .
How do you have “ blind justice ” when the video is so emotionally jarring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reaction to it once they ’ ve seen it ?
I can ’ t think of a single person who watched the entire thing from beginning to end and didn ’ t have the reaction that it was just a police officer “ doing his job.
” We all made judgments .
The video had gone viral , protests were already beginning , and all four officers had been deemed guilty in the court of public opinion .
Politicians were speaking out as though the officers involved were already guilty , and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ initial charge against Derek Chauvin from “ third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter ” to “ second-degree murder.
” Minnesota ’ s AG , Keith Ellison , said that even though there was video of George Floyd ’ s final moments , it wasn ’ t going to be an easy trial .
George Parry , a former federal and state prosecutor , wrote a very thorough article in The American Spectator looking at the evidence in the George Floyd case .
What he found was that it wasn ’ t as open-and-shut as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Parry includes transcripts of the arrest from the moment that the officers approach Floyd .
Floyd was incoherent , acting erratically , non-compliant , and foaming at the mouth .
He was having trouble walking and standing up .
He wanted to lie on the ground .
But , while still upright , he complained three times that he was “ claustrophobic , ” seven times that he “ can ’ t breathe , ” and twice that he was “ going to die.
” And Speaker 9 exclaimed that Floyd looked like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heart attack.
” All of this happened before he was on the ground and immobilized by the police .
Nevertheless , as he continued to resist and behave irrationally , his condition deteriorated and his complaints of being unable to breathe increased in frequency even though no one was applying force of any kind to his neck or compressing his back or chest .
After Floyd was on the ground , he continued to move about and say that he couldn ’ t breathe .
Lane was near Floyd ’ s feet , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s body , and Chauvin at his back and head with his knee on Floyd ’ s neck .
The autopsy report by the Hennepin County Medical Examiner ’ s Office is titled “ CARDIOPULMONARY ARREST COMPLICATING LAW ENFORCEMENT SUBDUAL , RESTRAINT , AND NECK COMPRESSION.
” Strangely enough , the report , which thoroughly sets forth in detail all physical and toxicological findings , makes no other mention of the purported cause of death .
In fact , the first iteration of the report didn ’ t even mention “ law enforcement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” and the criminal complaint filed by prosecutors stated that the autopsy “ revealed no physical findings that support a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation.
” Moreover , prior to issuing the autopsy report , the Hennepin County Medical Examiner preliminarily found that the “ autopsy revealed no physical findings that support a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation .
Mr. Floyd had underlying health conditions including coronary artery disease and hypertensive heart disease .
The combined effects of Mr. Floyd being restrained by the police , his underlying health conditions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ likely contributed to his death.
” ( Emphasis added . )
So why couldn ’ t Floyd breathe , and how did he die ?
The clear answers to those questions are to be found in his toxicology report , which overwhelmingly and unerringly supports the conclusion that Floyd ’ s breathing difficulties and death were the direct and undeniable result of his ingestion of fentanyl mixed with methamphetamine .
When Floyd arrived at the hospital , his blood was drawn .
According to the toxicology report , postmortem testing of that blood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drugs , “ Fentanyl 11 ng/mL ” ( nanograms per milliter ) .
In that regard , tucked away in the report ’ s “ Reference Comments ” is this : “ Signs associated with fentanyl toxicity include severe respiratory depression , seizures , hypotension , coma and death .
In fatalities from fentanyl , blood concentrations are variable and have been reported as low as 3 ng/mL.
” Got that ?
According to the toxicology report , which is central to the prosecution ’ s case , at 11 ng/mL , Floyd @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3 ng/mL dose of fentanyl in his bloodstream when he arrived unresponsive at the hospital .
George Parry isn ’ t the only one to notice these inconvenient truths , either .
The attorney for Thomas Lane , one of the Minneapolis cops charged with “ aiding and abetting second-degree murder ” of George Floyd , has filed a motion to dismiss the charges against Lane because evidence points to Floyd having died of an overdose .
In Monday ’ s filing , Earl Gray said the disappearance of a white spot on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ camera video looks like “ 2 milligrams of fentanyl , a lethal dose.
” “ All he had to do is sit in the police car , like every other defendant who is initially arrested .
While attempting to avoid his arrest , all by himself , Mr. Floyd overdosed on Fentanyl , ” the court documents read .
“ Given his intoxication level , breathing would have been difficult at best .
Mr. Floyd ’ s intentional failure to obey commands , coupled with his overdosing , contributed to his own death.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s autopsy report said toxicology testing found fentanyl and methamphetamine in Floyd ’ s system .
With this evidence , Parry asks the question , “ will there be a judge or jury with enough integrity and courage to defy the mob and , in recognition of the clear and overwhelming exculpatory evidence , set these wrongfully accused men free ?
” I think we all know the answer to that .
If they did , the cities would be burning even worse than they are now .

The entire country was rocked by the almost 9-minute video–but what about justice?
When I first saw that terrible viral video of the death of George Floyd while in police custody, I was just as disturbed, outraged, and horrified as the activists shouting about police brutality–but I couldn’t say with certainty that it was motivated by racism. Nobody could claim that definitively even though they did just that on the left. The video did, however, seem to be a clear case of police brutality out in broad daylight. At least, it did to me…but then, I’m not a law enforcement officer.
After the horror subsided a bit, one thing really started to bother me–how would these police officers get a fair trial?
We pride ourselves on a justice system predicated on fairness and that it ideally looks at “just the facts” of each case. We know our system doesn’t always live up to those ideals, but even when it does seem cut-and-dry, a full investigation needs to be done to bring forward the facts that aren’t immediately visible.
The details came out that Floyd was being held down because of a counterfeit $20 bill. It seemed like such an insignificant crime to lose a life over, especially since so many people are struggling due to ongoing COVID-19 lockdowns all over the world. The outrage grew and spread, and cities began to burn.
How do you have “blind justice” when the video is so emotionally jarring and compels people to make a knee-jerk reaction to it once they’ve seen it? I can’t think of a single person who watched the entire thing from beginning to end and didn’t have the reaction that it was just a police officer “doing his job.” We all made judgments.
The video had gone viral, protests were already beginning, and all four officers had been deemed guilty in the court of public opinion. Politicians were speaking out as though the officers involved were already guilty, and the Attorney General of Minnesota ramped up the initial charge against Derek Chauvin from “third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter” to “second-degree murder.”
Minnesota’s AG, Keith Ellison, said that even though there was video of George Floyd’s final moments, it wasn’t going to be an easy trial.
George Parry, a former federal and state prosecutor, wrote a very thorough article in The American Spectator looking at the evidence in the George Floyd case. What he found was that it wasn’t as open-and-shut as everyone seems to think it is.
Parry wrote:
…the evidence proves that, when he first encountered the police, George Floyd was well on his way to dying from a self-administered drug overdose. Moreover, far from publicly, brazenly, and against their own self-interest slowly and sadistically killing Floyd in broad daylight before civilian witnesses with video cameras, the evidence proves that the defendants exhibited concern for Floyd’s condition and twice called for emergency medical services to render aid to him. Strange behavior, indeed, for supposedly brutal law officers allegedly intent on causing him harm.
Here’s a quick summary of Parry’s article.
1. The Officers’ Bodycam Videos
Parry includes transcripts of the arrest from the moment that the officers approach Floyd.
Floyd was incoherent, acting erratically, non-compliant, and foaming at the mouth. He was having trouble walking and standing up. He wanted to lie on the ground. But, while still upright, he complained three times that he was “claustrophobic,” seven times that he “can’t breathe,” and twice that he was “going to die.” And Speaker 9 exclaimed that Floyd looked like he was about to have a “heart attack.” All of this happened before he was on the ground and immobilized by the police. Nevertheless, as he continued to resist and behave irrationally, his condition deteriorated and his complaints of being unable to breathe increased in frequency even though no one was applying force of any kind to his neck or compressing his back or chest. After Floyd was on the ground, he continued to move about and say that he couldn’t breathe. Lane was near Floyd’s feet, Kueng at the middle of Floyd’s body, and Chauvin at his back and head with his knee on Floyd’s neck.
2. The Autopsy Report
The autopsy report by the Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s Office is titled “CARDIOPULMONARY ARREST COMPLICATING LAW ENFORCEMENT SUBDUAL, RESTRAINT, AND NECK COMPRESSION.” Strangely enough, the report, which thoroughly sets forth in detail all physical and toxicological findings, makes no other mention of the purported cause of death. In fact, the first iteration of the report didn’t even mention “law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression,” and the criminal complaint filed by prosecutors stated that the autopsy “revealed no physical findings that support a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation.” Moreover, prior to issuing the autopsy report, the Hennepin County Medical Examiner preliminarily found that the “autopsy revealed no physical findings that support a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation. Mr. Floyd had underlying health conditions including coronary artery disease and hypertensive heart disease. The combined effects of Mr. Floyd being restrained by the police, his underlying health conditions and any potential intoxicants in his system likely contributed to his death.” (Emphasis added.)
3. The Toxicology Report
So why couldn’t Floyd breathe, and how did he die? The clear answers to those questions are to be found in his toxicology report, which overwhelmingly and unerringly supports the conclusion that Floyd’s breathing difficulties and death were the direct and undeniable result of his ingestion of fentanyl mixed with methamphetamine. When Floyd arrived at the hospital, his blood was drawn. According to the toxicology report, postmortem testing of that blood established the presence of, among other drugs, “Fentanyl 11 ng/mL” (nanograms per milliter). In that regard, tucked away in the report’s “Reference Comments” is this: “Signs associated with fentanyl toxicity include severe respiratory depression, seizures, hypotension, coma and death. In fatalities from fentanyl, blood concentrations are variable and have been reported as low as 3 ng/mL.” Got that? According to the toxicology report, which is central to the prosecution’s case, at 11 ng/mL, Floyd had over three times the potentially lethal 3 ng/mL dose of fentanyl in his bloodstream when he arrived unresponsive at the hospital.
George Parry isn’t the only one to notice these inconvenient truths, either. The attorney for Thomas Lane, one of the Minneapolis cops charged with “aiding and abetting second-degree murder” of George Floyd, has filed a motion to dismiss the charges against Lane because evidence points to Floyd having died of an overdose.
In Monday’s filing, Earl Gray said the disappearance of a white spot on Floyd’s tongue in the body camera video looks like “2 milligrams of fentanyl, a lethal dose.” “All he had to do is sit in the police car, like every other defendant who is initially arrested. While attempting to avoid his arrest, all by himself, Mr. Floyd overdosed on Fentanyl,” the court documents read. “Given his intoxication level, breathing would have been difficult at best. Mr. Floyd’s intentional failure to obey commands, coupled with his overdosing, contributed to his own death.” The Hennepin County medical examiner’s autopsy report said toxicology testing found fentanyl and methamphetamine in Floyd’s system. Source: New York Post
With this evidence, Parry asks the question, “will there be a judge or jury with enough integrity and courage to defy the mob and, in recognition of the clear and overwhelming exculpatory evidence, set these wrongfully accused men free?”
I think we all know the answer to that. If they did, the cities would be burning even worse than they are now.


clashdaily--2020-08-19--New Trump Painting Of Donald Dusting The Devil Will Spawn Liberal Tears

Leftists and the morally preening NeverTrump Republican grifters just can not understand why so many evangelicals support a former billionaire playboy who is on marriage number three .
Yeah , maybe on the surface it seems odd , but there are some good reasons that Christians dig Trump .
• He ’ s been unswerving from his pro-life position .
He was the first President to address the March for Life since the march began .
• He backs the First Amendment protections for religious groups against government interference/overreach .
• He didn ’ t shy away from social conservatism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have ‘ broad appeal.
’ • He ’ s been keeping his promises .
( Despite Dems throwing wrenches in his plans . )
• His kids are pretty awesome .
That says something about his character .
Trending : REVEALED : Photos Of Smiling Bill Clinton Getting A Massage From One Of Epstein ’ s Victims America is a special place founded on Judeo-Christian values and no matter what the critics say , that is what has made our country the greatest and freest country in the world .
Although we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the moment–and maybe they are–we know that our battles in this world aren ’ t really against flesh and blood , but against the rulers of the darkness of this age and spiritual wickedness in heavenly places .
( Ephesians 6.10-18 ) President Trump , through his policies , has been taking on that wickedness head-on .
Check out this spicy addition to the Doug Giles collection of Trump art… Trump vs. El Diablo Get your copy here .
Choose the perfect size and medium for your home or office .
Now , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump is on the level with Jesus in defeating El Diablo , but that Trump ’ s policies are consistent with Christian principles .
But I ’ m sure your liberal relatives won ’ t get it .
They ’ re gon na vote for Joe because he ’ s a ‘ staunch Catholic ’ who supports an extreme abortion agenda and has committed to go after nuns to provide birth control as part of Obamacare because those are ‘ Christian principles .
’

Hogg is once again proving there is a difference between having an Ivy League degree and being actually educated.


clashdaily--2020-08-19--Stark Difference: While Left Calls For Defunding Cops Trump Visits Border Agents In Yuma

Piece by piece , that wall is getting built !
The people who work so hard to block human trafficking @ @ @ @ @ cities are regularly demonized by the Democrats .
Trump , and his supporters , on @ @ @ @ @ all the good they do , and want the wall to go up as a @ @ @ @ @ work they do .
They are the difference between those who come in our nation @ @ @ @ @ with good intentions and those who climb in through a metaphorical broken window .
Trending @ @ @ @ @ Smiling Bill Clinton Getting A Massage From One Of Epstein ’ s Victims Unlike Joe @ @ @ @ @ in his bunker and is waiting to be told he won an election… Trump is @ @ @ @ @ are .
Here is the President visiting Border Agents in Yuma : And here he @ @ @ @ @ the National Border Control Council .
Is this really the campaign Biden and his puppeteers @ @ @ @ @ ?

Piece by piece, that wall is getting built!
The people who work so hard to block human trafficking and Fentanyl from decimating our cities are regularly demonized by the Democrats.
Trump, and his supporters, on the other hand, recognize all the good they do, and want the wall to go up as a force multiplier in the good work they do.
They are the difference between those who come in our nation’s front door, with good intentions and those who climb in through a metaphorical broken window.
Unlike Joe, who has been hiding in his bunker and is waiting to be told he won an election… Trump is visiting actual Americans where they are.
In the first two days of the DNC, President @realDonaldTrump has visited: ?? Minneapolis, MN
?? Mankato, MN
?? Oshkosh, WI
?? Yuma, AZ Sleepy @JoeBiden has visited: ? His basement — Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) August 19, 2020
Here is the President visiting Border Agents in Yuma:
President @realDonaldTrump met with Border Patrol agents in Yuma, Arizona, for an update on the border wall. In two weeks, 300 miles will be complete! pic.twitter.com/DWhIzPQpLq — The White House (@WhiteHouse) August 19, 2020
And here he is accepting the endorsement of the National Border Control Council.
President Trump accepts the endorsement of the National Border Patrol Council in Yuma, AZ #Trump2020Landslide @realDonaldTrump pic.twitter.com/ROQb9Ta93r — DeplorableArmyBrat (@yogagenie) August 18, 2020
Is this really the campaign Biden and his puppeteers want to run against Trump?
A tale of two campaigns⤵ ?@realDonaldTrump in Yuma, Arizona accepting the endorsement of the National Border Patrol Council
?@EricTrump in Milwaukee, Wisconsin accepting the endorsement of the Milwaukee Police Association
?@TrumpWomensTour all over Minnesota. ?Sleepy Joe pic.twitter.com/NxvqeiKy9J — Nick Trainer (@NicholasTrainer) August 19, 2020
Ok, then.
Lotsa luck with that.
You’ll need it.


clashdaily--2020-08-19--WATCH: BLM Leader Defends Looting Because The U.S. ‘Steals’ And ‘Pillages’ From Other Countries

Martha McCallum had New York BLM Chair , Hawk Newsome on her show again on Tuesday evening , and it got pretty heated .
Newsome refused to answer her questions directly and made some outrageous statements including what appeared to be tacit approval of looting as a form of reparations .
We don ’ t know for certain because Newsome was cagey with some of his answers .
The first time Newsome appeared on The Story he said that if BLM doesn ’ t get what it wants they ’ ll “ burn it down.
” He was cagey then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could be taken figuratively or literally “ depending on your interpretation.
” Trending : REVEALED : Photos Of Smiling Bill Clinton Getting A Massage From One Of Epstein ’ s Victims HEY PATRIOTS : BLM Leader Makes Dangerous Ultimatum On TV… Is That News ?
McCallum asked Newsome his thoughts on Rudy Giuliani ’ s comments on her show on Monday night characterizing the larger BLM movement as a “ domestic terrorist organization ” for turning a blind eye to looting and rioting .
The Chair of BLM New York went off on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who runs his mouth ” and McCallum tried to bring the focus back to the statement rather than the man who said it .
Newsome also bizarrely said that Guiliani should have condemned the KKK as terrorists responsible for “ bloodshed for hundreds of years ” as well as the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in 1963 , the organizational headquarters for Rev .
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and other leaders at the height of the Civil Rights movement .
Newsome doesn ’ t seem to realize that the Ku @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back against the Republican reconstruction of the South , and was still supported by Democrats in the modern era .
Even Biden called KKK supporters “ fine people.
” When McCallum finally explained to him that Giuliani was talking about looters and people ruining businesses , Newsome replied , “ So when America goes and steals diamonds and oils , who ’ s calling us terrorists ?
When the American government goes and pillages different countries , who ’ s calling us terrorists ?
” MacCallum then turned the conversation to recent remarks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who defended looting as a form of reparations .
In response , Newsome suggested that criticizing looters was an outgrowth of White supremacy .
“ The problem with oppression and White supremacy is , White supremacy will have you criticizing the oppressed and worshiping the oppressors , ” he said .
“ Now , if you want to talk to me about reparations , nothing falls short of a solution other than people cutting a check .
If you want to do something about reparations , cut the check .
“ And we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everyday Americans ’ pockets , ” he added .
“ We ’ re talking about banks like Brown Brothers Harriman , who benefited from slavery .
Other insurance companies that sold insurance policies on slaves .
We ’ re talking about the American government that was founded on the backs of slaves .
She asked Newsome directly , “ Do you think–do you agree that it ’ s okay to go in and break the windows at Gucci ’ s or Macy ’ s or Nike because it makes sure that that person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That was my question to you .
Is that ethically okay to you ?
” Newsome responds , “ Okay , okay .
Okay .
And before I answer that , I want to ask you this , do you think it ’ s okay that America kills people in their homes like Breonna Taylor and our politicians do not do anything about it.
” At this point , the normally unflappable McCallum got pretty frustrated with Newsome ’ s non-answers and circular arguments .
McCallum is right , there are two different @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t want to address that , he wants to conflate them .
This is the problem…you can ’ t have an actual discussion with many of these activists .
Any criticism is “ white supremacy ” even if you ’ re not white .
They truly believe that they are right and everyone else is wrong .
When you try to get them to define their terms , they deflect and change the subject .
If you ask them what they mean , they make sweeping generalizations or pick one thing that pretty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Taylor–and say that if you disagree with them that you want people to die or are racist , or some other nonsense .
Clearly , Newsome wants to be taken seriously by the media and by the far-left extremists that are willing to bully , steal , and set fire to the country if they don ’ t get what they want .
It kinda reminds me of this clip :

Somebody’s mom didn’t teach him that “two wrongs don’t make a right.”
Martha McCallum had New York BLM Chair, Hawk Newsome on her show again on Tuesday evening, and it got pretty heated. Newsome refused to answer her questions directly and made some outrageous statements including what appeared to be tacit approval of looting as a form of reparations. We don’t know for certain because Newsome was cagey with some of his answers.
The first time Newsome appeared on The Story he said that if BLM doesn’t get what it wants they’ll “burn it down.” He was cagey then, too. He said that it could be taken figuratively or literally “depending on your interpretation.”
ClashDaily covered Newsome’s “burn it down” comment here:
HEY PATRIOTS: BLM Leader Makes Dangerous Ultimatum On TV… Is That News?
McCallum asked Newsome his thoughts on Rudy Giuliani’s comments on her show on Monday night characterizing the larger BLM movement as a “domestic terrorist organization” for turning a blind eye to looting and rioting.
The Chair of BLM New York went off on Giuliani personally calling him “a blowhard who runs his mouth” and McCallum tried to bring the focus back to the statement rather than the man who said it. Newsome also bizarrely said that Guiliani should have condemned the KKK as terrorists responsible for “bloodshed for hundreds of years” as well as the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in 1963, the organizational headquarters for Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and other leaders at the height of the Civil Rights movement.
Newsome doesn’t seem to realize that the Ku Klux Klan was founded by Democrats pushing back against the Republican reconstruction of the South, and was still supported by Democrats in the modern era. Even Biden called KKK supporters “fine people.”
When McCallum finally explained to him that Giuliani was talking about looters and people ruining businesses, Newsome replied, “So when America goes and steals diamonds and oils, who’s calling us terrorists? When the American government goes and pillages different countries, who’s calling us terrorists?”
MacCallum then turned the conversation to recent remarks by Chicago BLM activist Ariel Atkins, who defended looting as a form of reparations. In response, Newsome suggested that criticizing looters was an outgrowth of White supremacy. “The problem with oppression and White supremacy is, White supremacy will have you criticizing the oppressed and worshiping the oppressors,” he said. “Now, if you want to talk to me about reparations, nothing falls short of a solution other than people cutting a check. If you want to do something about reparations, cut the check. “And we’re not talking about going in everyday Americans’ pockets,” he added. “We’re talking about banks like Brown Brothers Harriman, who benefited from slavery. Other insurance companies that sold insurance policies on slaves. We’re talking about the American government that was founded on the backs of slaves. Source: Fox News
She asked Newsome directly, “Do you think–do you agree that it’s okay to go in and break the windows at Gucci’s or Macy’s or Nike because it makes sure that that person eats and that person has clothes? That was my question to you. Is that ethically okay to you?”
Newsome responds, “Okay, okay. Okay. And before I answer that, I want to ask you this, do you think it’s okay that America kills people in their homes like Breonna Taylor and our politicians do not do anything about it.”
At this point, the normally unflappable McCallum got pretty frustrated with Newsome’s non-answers and circular arguments.
Watch:
Watch the latest video at foxnews.com
McCallum is right, there are two different issues here, but Newsome doesn’t want to address that, he wants to conflate them.
This is the problem…you can’t have an actual discussion with many of these activists. Any criticism is “white supremacy” even if you’re not white. They truly believe that they are right and everyone else is wrong. When you try to get them to define their terms, they deflect and change the subject. If you ask them what they mean, they make sweeping generalizations or pick one thing that pretty much everyone condemns–like the death of Breonna Taylor–and say that if you disagree with them that you want people to die or are racist, or some other nonsense.
Clearly, Newsome wants to be taken seriously by the media and by the far-left extremists that are willing to bully, steal, and set fire to the country if they don’t get what they want.
It kinda reminds me of this clip: