clashdaily--2020-07-27--Conservative YouTuber Asks Congressman To Disavow Antifa Violence In Portland–Rep. Jerry Nadler Call

Conservative YouTuber Asks Congressman To Disavow Antifa Violence In Portland–Rep. Jerry Nadler Calls It A ‘Myth’

In case the impeachment drama wasn ’ t enough to demonstrate that this hack has lost his tether to reality , Nadler ’ s got a hot take on Antifa to prove the point .
He doesn ’ t believe there really IS such a thing as Antifa .
Don ’ t wait for the punchline , it isn ’ t a joke .
He ( apparently ) really doesn ’ t think it ’ s real .
Neither does he think there has been any violence or rioting in Portland .
Trending : FDNY : White Firefighter From Iconic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Guard… Sues For Racial Bias Say what now ?
Here ’ s a news report from Portland , describing ‘ night 60 ’ of the not-so-peaceful protests .
The crowd began launching mortar-style fireworks over the fence before midnight , climbed over the fence and entered the portico .
Around the same time , another group of demonstrators lit a large fire in Lownsdale Square Park .
Police said people in the crowd continually picked at the fence and some gathered with shields and umbrellas to cover a person trying to cut through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , someone started a fire just inside the fence along SW 3rd Avenue .
Dozens of people approached the outside of the fence with shields and began throwing objects over it .
U.S. agents deployed gas and flashbangs and warned protesters to stay off federal property .
The Portland Police Bureau said it did not participate in dispersing the crowds by the federal courthouse .
…Chad Wolf , the Department of Homeland Security secretary , painted a disturbing picture in the city on “ Sunday Morning Futures ” and said protesters have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have targeted “ their violence on federal courthouses and federal law enforcement officers.
” The shooting on Sunday night would mark the second reported shooting near the protest .
Authorities said one person suffered “ numerous gunshot wounds ” early Sunday morning , which occurred at the same time that police were forced to respond to another riot at the location .
That victim ’ s injuries were not life-threatening .
—FoxNews This will round out the picture even further .
As for the ‘ Antifa ’ angle , maybe Nadler should consult @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DNC and current AG of whatever is left of Minnesota .
He had a thing or two to say about Antifa .
Hey Nadler , you can take that uniformed opinion of yours and stuff it up your blowhole .

In case the impeachment drama wasn’t enough to demonstrate that this hack has lost his tether to reality, Nadler’s got a hot take on Antifa to prove the point.
He doesn’t believe there really IS such a thing as Antifa.
Don’t wait for the punchline, it isn’t a joke. He (apparently) really doesn’t think it’s real.
Neither does he think there has been any violence or rioting in Portland.
Say what now?
I ran into Jerry Nadler in DC and asked him to disavow the Antifa violence/rioting in Portland. His response? “THATS A MYTH” pic.twitter.com/veImyE2rju — Essential Fleccas ?? (@fleccas) July 27, 2020
Haha I meant Jerry ?????? — An0maly (@LegendaryEnergy) July 27, 2020
Here’s a news report from Portland, describing ‘night 60’ of the not-so-peaceful protests.
The crowd began launching mortar-style fireworks over the fence before midnight, climbed over the fence and entered the portico. Around the same time, another group of demonstrators lit a large fire in Lownsdale Square Park. Police said people in the crowd continually picked at the fence and some gathered with shields and umbrellas to cover a person trying to cut through it. Just before 1 a.m. Monday, someone started a fire just inside the fence along SW 3rd Avenue. Dozens of people approached the outside of the fence with shields and began throwing objects over it. U.S. agents deployed gas and flashbangs and warned protesters to stay off federal property. The Portland Police Bureau said it did not participate in dispersing the crowds by the federal courthouse. …Chad Wolf, the Department of Homeland Security secretary, painted a disturbing picture in the city on “Sunday Morning Futures” and said protesters have been armed with bats, power tools and have targeted “their violence on federal courthouses and federal law enforcement officers.” The shooting on Sunday night would mark the second reported shooting near the protest. Authorities said one person suffered “numerous gunshot wounds” early Sunday morning, which occurred at the same time that police were forced to respond to another riot at the location. That victim’s injuries were not life-threatening. —FoxNews
This will round out the picture even further.
“Peaceful Protests”
Flash bangs, rubber bullets and tear gas. Protesters now throwing it back with hockey sticks. These surreal scenes in Portland have been happening nightly #PDXprotest pic.twitter.com/ONEyPSRTws — Melissa Etehad اتحاد (@melissaetehad) July 27, 2020
“Peaceful Protest gear”
Ammunition and destructive devices recovered at Lownsdale Square Park (Photo) https://t.co/k4ZmvTzlh6 pic.twitter.com/xHaLZM8uWi — Portland Police (@PortlandPolice) July 27, 2020
As for the ‘Antifa’ angle, maybe Nadler should consult with the former Deputy Chair of the DNC and current AG of whatever is left of Minnesota. He had a thing or two to say about Antifa.
Hey Nadler, you can take that uniformed opinion of yours and stuff it up your blowhole.


clashdaily--2020-07-27--FDNY: White Firefighter From Iconic 9/11 Photo Is Kicked Off Of Color Guard… Sues For Racial Bias

They pulled a firefighter in that famous 9/11 photo from that role because they wanted an ‘ all-black ’ color guard .
Lt. Daniel McWilliams , who is white , was bumped from the color guard precisely because of the color of his skin .
How surprised would you really be to learn that the ‘ diversity officer ’ has no problem with McWilliams getting bumped in favor of someone who would make the color guard entirely comprised of black firefighters ?
Can you even IMAGINE the uproar if someone requested an all-white color guard ?
Let ’ s take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FDNY diversity official has said that it ’ s ‘ most definitely ’ acceptable to keep a white firefighter off a ceremonial color guard so the flag bearers could all be black , according to a new report .
White firefighter Lt. Daniel McWilliams filed a lawsuit claiming racial bias after he was removed from a flag-bearing unit at a November 2017 memorial mass honoring deceased members of the Vulcan Society , a fraternal society of black firefighters .
And FDNY ’ s chief diversity and inclusion officer , lawyer Cecilia Loving , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ York state Division of Human Rights trial , The New York Post reports .
McWilliams was one of the three FDNY firefighters seen in an iconic photo as they hoist the American flag at Ground Zero in the days after the 9/11 attacks .
According to McWilliams ’ complaint , he been selected by the FDNY Ceremonial Unit to serve as one of the flag bearers in the color guard at the memorial service .
Being a flag bearer at the event was an ‘ esteemed honor and privilege ’ for McWilliams , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Upon his arrival at the event , however , McWilliams was barred from participating in the color guard by then-Vulcan Society president Regina Wilson because she allegedly had asked for an all-black color guard at the mass .
…McWilliams claimed in his suit that he asked Wilson if she was removing him from the color guard because he ’ s not black .
She confirmed that was the case , he said .
…McWilliams claimed he left the memorial ‘ to save himself from further shame , humiliation and embarrassment , ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and colleagues , the New York Daily News reported .
During her trial testimony , McWilliams ’ lawyer , Keith Sullivan , asked Loving – who is black – ‘ So , a request for an all-black color guard is not discriminatory ?
’ ‘ No , it isn ’ t , ’ Loving said , according to the New York Post .
Sullivan also asked Loving if it ’ s OK to request an all-black color guard , to which she was quoted as saying , ‘ Most definitely.
’ By way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was OK to swap out a white person for a black person to ‘ uplift our identities and our separate ethnicities in order to instill a sense of pride and community and support for one another.
’ —DailyMail So , what do you think ?
Based on what we ’ ve read so far , do you think he should win his suit , or is it now ok to specifically exclude white people from honors… AFTER they have already been given out ?

They pulled a firefighter in that famous 9/11 photo from that role because they wanted an ‘all-black’ color guard.
Lt. Daniel McWilliams, who is white, was bumped from the color guard precisely because of the color of his skin. How surprised would you really be to learn that the ‘diversity officer’ has no problem with McWilliams getting bumped in favor of someone who would make the color guard entirely comprised of black firefighters?
Can you even IMAGINE the uproar if someone requested an all-white color guard?
Let’s take a look at what happened.
An FDNY diversity official has said that it’s ‘most definitely’ acceptable to keep a white firefighter off a ceremonial color guard so the flag bearers could all be black, according to a new report. White firefighter Lt. Daniel McWilliams filed a lawsuit claiming racial bias after he was removed from a flag-bearing unit at a November 2017 memorial mass honoring deceased members of the Vulcan Society, a fraternal society of black firefighters. And FDNY’s chief diversity and inclusion officer, lawyer Cecilia Loving, has defended the decision at a New York state Division of Human Rights trial, The New York Post reports. McWilliams was one of the three FDNY firefighters seen in an iconic photo as they hoist the American flag at Ground Zero in the days after the 9/11 attacks. According to McWilliams’ complaint, he been selected by the FDNY Ceremonial Unit to serve as one of the flag bearers in the color guard at the memorial service. Being a flag bearer at the event was an ‘esteemed honor and privilege’ for McWilliams, according to his lawsuit, CNN reported. Upon his arrival at the event, however, McWilliams was barred from participating in the color guard by then-Vulcan Society president Regina Wilson because she allegedly had asked for an all-black color guard at the mass. …McWilliams claimed in his suit that he asked Wilson if she was removing him from the color guard because he’s not black. She confirmed that was the case, he said. …McWilliams claimed he left the memorial ‘to save himself from further shame, humiliation and embarrassment,’ as their exchange was overheard by friends and colleagues, the New York Daily News reported. During her trial testimony, McWilliams’ lawyer, Keith Sullivan, asked Loving – who is black – ‘So, a request for an all-black color guard is not discriminatory?’ ‘No, it isn’t,’ Loving said, according to the New York Post. Sullivan also asked Loving if it’s OK to request an all-black color guard, to which she was quoted as saying, ‘Most definitely.’ By way of explanation, Loving said that it was OK to swap out a white person for a black person to ‘uplift our identities and our separate ethnicities in order to instill a sense of pride and community and support for one another.’ —DailyMail
So, what do you think?
Based on what we’ve read so far, do you think he should win his suit, or is it now ok to specifically exclude white people from honors… AFTER they have already been given out?


clashdaily--2020-07-27--BOLD: Woman’s Message Fishslaps BLM Identity Politics ‘Don’t Call Me A Black Woman’ Because…

The BLM rules of the game are that an adjective describing your skin color is the defining characteristic of your place in society .
But this chica refuses to drink their Kool-Aid .
If an adjective is needed to describe you , it must be there to serve an important purpose .
But the one that the race-baiters insist on using to describe her is one that she personally finds insulting .
Why ?
Is she , as some might allege , ‘ self-loathing ’ in some way , or embarrassed in some way by her ethnic heritage ?
Trending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 9/11 Photo Is Kicked Off Of Color Guard… Sues For Racial Bias That answer might shock anyone indoctrinated into the world of intersectional identity politics , but it ’ s absolutely true .
Discomfort with her ethnicity has nothing whatsoever to do with it .
She rejects that adjective for a different reason .
Tagging her with that particular adjective does not capture the facet of her identity that she sees as *most* fundamental to who she really is .
And if Identitarian Politics is going to be held to its own rules @ @ @ @ @ @ @ real measure of which adjective — if any — a person ought to be measured by ?
This should prompt the obvious next question — with what adjective SHOULD this woman be tagged ?
She would rather be known as a Christian woman than as a Black one .
Because THAT is where she attaches her ultimate identity .
Considering Christians believe in a life after death that includes a resurrected body fundamentally different in some way than the one we now know , wouldn ’ t it make sense that someone who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in decades would anchor her identity in something more enduring than skin color ?
But try explaining that to the irreligious fundamentalists over at BLM and they ’ ll waver somewhere between confusion and outrage .
We could hardly imagine how much it would grind their gears to see the Galilean Rebel face-to-face .
They ’ d quickly discover he ’ s not so easily squeezed into the mold of a race-baiting Marxist revolutionary .
In fact , he ’ s not the sort to be intimidated in any way whatsoever .
Check @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg .
While you ’ re at it , here ’ s his latest book : Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to paint Jesus as a non-offensive bearded woman who endorses their agenda .
This book blows that nonsense all to hell .
From the stonking laptop of bestselling author , Doug Giles , comes a new book that focuses on Jesus ’ overt masculine traits like no other books have heretofore .
It ’ s informative , bold , hilarious , and scary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years of scouring the scripture that , If Masculinity Is ‘ Toxic ’ , Call Jesus Radioactive .

The BLM rules of the game are that an adjective describing your skin color is the defining characteristic of your place in society. But this chica refuses to drink their Kool-Aid.
If an adjective is needed to describe you, it must be there to serve an important purpose. But the one that the race-baiters insist on using to describe her is one that she personally finds insulting.
‘Don’t call me a black woman’ Priscilla Shirer says.
Why? Is she, as some might allege, ‘self-loathing’ in some way, or embarrassed in some way by her ethnic heritage?
Nope.
That answer might shock anyone indoctrinated into the world of intersectional identity politics, but it’s absolutely true. Discomfort with her ethnicity has nothing whatsoever to do with it.
She rejects that adjective for a different reason.
Tagging her with that particular adjective does not capture the facet of her identity that she sees as *most* fundamental to who she really is.
And if Identitarian Politics is going to be held to its own rules, shouldn’t THAT be the real measure of which adjective — if any — a person ought to be measured by?
This should prompt the obvious next question — with what adjective SHOULD this woman be tagged?
She would rather be known as a Christian woman than as a Black one. Because THAT is where she attaches her ultimate identity.
Considering Christians believe in a life after death that includes a resurrected body fundamentally different in some way than the one we now know, wouldn’t it make sense that someone who measures a lifetime in millennia rather than in decades would anchor her identity in something more enduring than skin color?
But try explaining that to the irreligious fundamentalists over at BLM and they’ll waver somewhere between confusion and outrage.
We could hardly imagine how much it would grind their gears to see the Galilean Rebel face-to-face. They’d quickly discover he’s not so easily squeezed into the mold of a race-baiting Marxist revolutionary.
In fact, he’s not the sort to be intimidated in any way whatsoever.
Check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg. While you’re at it, here’s his latest book:
Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to paint Jesus as a non-offensive bearded woman who endorses their agenda. This book blows that nonsense all to hell. From the stonking laptop of bestselling author, Doug Giles, comes a new book that focuses on Jesus’ overt masculine traits like no other books have heretofore. It’s informative, bold, hilarious, and scary. Giles has concluded, after many years of scouring the scripture that, If Masculinity Is ‘Toxic’, Call Jesus Radioactive.


clashdaily--2020-07-27--Here’s 7 Reasons The Church Should Ignore ‘COVID Orders’

True to form , as anyone familiar with MacArthur ’ s work can attest , MacArthur ’ s message on the topic drew heavily upon scripture for its authority .
Because he is the sort of Christian leader who doesn ’ t begin by asking what the popular response , or the culturally acceptable , or the pragmatic response to a difficult question might be .
To the extent that he is able , he builds his answers on what the BIBLICAL response to a particular question might be .
And it just so happens that the question of State @ @ @ @ @ @ @ activities of a biblically-faithful Church is one that has been explicitly addressed in Holy Writ .
“ We thank you that we can gather and worship YOU our ROCK and our REDEEMER .
We stand on Your WORD .
We live by it .
We love by it .
We worship by it.
” @ johnmacarthur Here is the response he gave to his congregation as it relates to the shutdown orders issued by Governor Newsom , as published on his Church ’ s website .
Christ , not Caesar , Is Head @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , July 24 , 2020A + A – RESET A Biblical Case for the Church ’ s Duty to Remain Open Christ is Lord of all .
He is the one true head of the church ( Ephesians 1:22 ; 5:23 ; Colossians 1:18 ) .
He is also King of kings—sovereign over every earthly authority ( 1 Timothy 6:15 ; Revelation 17:14 ; 19:16 ) .
Grace Community Church has always stood immovably on those biblical principles .
As His people , we are subject to His will and commands as revealed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and will not acquiesce to a government-imposed moratorium on our weekly congregational worship or other regular corporate gatherings .
Compliance would be disobedience to our Lord ’ s clear commands .
Some will think such a firm statement is inexorably in conflict with the command to be subject to governing authorities laid out in Romans 13 and 1 Peter 2 .
Scripture does mandate careful , conscientious obedience to all governing authority , including kings , governors , employers , and their agents ( in Peter ’ s words , “ not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but also to those who are unreasonable ” [ 1 Peter 2:18 ] ) .
Insofar as government authorities do not attempt to assert ecclesiastical authority or issue orders that forbid our obedience to God ’ s law , their authority is to be obeyed whether we agree with their rulings or not .
In other words , Romans 13 and 1 Peter 2 still bind the consciences of individual Christians .
We are to obey our civil authorities as powers that God Himself has ordained .
However , while civil government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the state , neither of those texts ( nor any other ) grants civic rulers jurisdiction over the church .
God has established three institutions within human society : the family , the state , and the church .
Each institution has a sphere of authority with jurisdictional limits that must be respected .
A father ’ s authority is limited to his own family .
Church leaders ’ authority ( which is delegated to them by Christ ) is limited to church matters .
And government is specifically tasked with the oversight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ within the boundaries of a nation or community .
God has not granted civic rulers authority over the doctrine , practice , or polity of the church .
The biblical framework limits the authority of each institution to its specific jurisdiction .
The church does not have the right to meddle in the affairs of individual families and ignore parental authority .
Parents do not have authority to manage civil matters while circumventing government officials .
And similarly , government officials have no right to interfere in ecclesiastical matters in a way that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pastors and elders .
When any one of the three institutions exceeds the bounds of its jurisdiction it is the duty of the other institutions to curtail that overreach .
Therefore , when any government official issues orders regulating worship ( such as bans on singing , caps on attendance , or prohibitions against gatherings and services ) , he steps outside the legitimate bounds of his God-ordained authority as a civic official and arrogates to himself authority that God expressly grants only to the Lord Jesus Christ as sovereign over His Kingdom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rule is mediated to local churches through those pastors and elders who teach His Word ( Matthew 16:18–19 ; 2 Timothy 3:16–4:2 ) .
Therefore , in response to the recent state order requiring churches in California to limit or suspend all meetings indefinitely , we , the pastors and elders of Grace Community Church , respectfully inform our civic leaders that they have exceeded their legitimate jurisdiction , and faithfulness to Christ prohibits us from observing the restrictions they want to impose on our corporate worship services .
Said another way , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ civil government to order , modify , forbid , or mandate worship .
When , how , and how often the church worships is not subject to Caesar .
Caesar himself is subject to God .
Jesus affirmed that principle when He told Pilate , “ You would have no authority over Me , unless it had been given you from above ” ( John 19:11 ) .
And because Christ is head of the church , ecclesiastical matters pertain to His Kingdom , not Caesar ’ s .
Jesus drew a stark @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said , “ Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar ’ s , and to God the things that are God ’ s ” ( Mark 12:17 ) .
Our Lord Himself always rendered to Caesar what was Caesar ’ s , but He never offered to Caesar what belongs solely to God .
As pastors and elders , we can not hand over to earthly authorities any privilege or power that belongs solely to Christ as head of His church .
Pastors and elders are the ones to whom Christ has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exercise His spiritual authority in the church ( 1 Peter 5:1–4 ; Hebrews 13:7 , 17 ) —and Scripture alone defines how and whom they are to serve ( 1 Corinthians 4:1–4 ) .
They have no duty to follow orders from a civil government attempting to regulate the worship or governance of the church .
In fact , pastors who cede their Christ-delegated authority in the church to a civil ruler have abdicated their responsibility before their Lord and violated the God-ordained spheres of authority as much as the secular official who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Our church ’ s doctrinal statement has included this paragraph for more than 40 years : We teach the autonomy of the local church , free from any external authority or control , with the right of self-government and freedom from the interference of any hierarchy of individuals or organizations ( Titus 1:5 ) .
We teach that it is scriptural for true churches to cooperate with each other for the presentation and propagation of the faith .
Each local church , however , through its elders and their interpretation and application @ @ @ @ @ @ @ judge of the measure and method of its cooperation .
The elders should determine all other matters of membership , policy , discipline , benevolence , and government as well ( Acts 15:19–31 ; 20:28 ; 1 Corinthians 5:4–7 , 13 ; 1 Peter 5:1–4 ) .
In short , as the church , we do not need the state ’ s permission to serve and worship our Lord as He has commanded .
The church is Christ ’ s precious bride ( 2 Corinthians 11:2 ; Ephesians 5:23–27 ) .
She belongs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ His will and serves under His authority .
He will tolerate no assault on her purity and no infringement of His headship over her .
All of that was established when Jesus said , “ I will build My church ; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it ” ( Matthew 16:18 ) .
Christ ’ s own authority is “ far above all rule and authority and power and dominion , and every name that is named , not only in this age but also in the one to come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] put all things in subjection under [ Christ ’ s ] feet , and gave Him as head over all things to the church , which is His body , the fullness of Him who fills all in all ” ( Ephesians 1:21–23 ) .
Accordingly , the honor that we rightly owe our earthly governors and magistrates ( Romans 13:7 ) does not include compliance when such officials attempt to subvert sound doctrine , corrupt biblical morality , exercise ecclesiastical authority , or supplant Christ as head of the church in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is clear : Christ is Lord over Caesar , not vice versa .
Christ , not Caesar , is head of the church .
Conversely , the church does not in any sense rule the state .
Again , these are distinct kingdoms , and Christ is sovereign over both .
Neither church nor state has any higher authority than that of Christ Himself , who declared , “ All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth ” ( Matthew 28:18 ) .
Notice that we are not making @ @ @ @ @ @ @ First Amendment of the United States Constitution expressly affirms this principle in its opening words : “ Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion , or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
” The right we are appealing to was not created by the Constitution .
It is one of those unalienable rights granted solely by God , who ordained human government and establishes both the extent and the limitations of the state ’ s authority ( Romans 13:1–7 ) .
Our argument therefore is purposely not grounded in the First @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same biblical principles that the Amendment itself is founded upon .
The exercise of true religion is a divine duty given to men and women created in God ’ s image ( Genesis 1:26–27 ; Acts 4:18–20 ; 5:29 ; cf .
Matthew 22:16–22 ) .
In other words , freedom of worship is a command of God , not a privilege granted by the state .
An additional point needs to be made in this context .
Christ is always faithful and true ( Revelation 19:11 ) .
Human governments are not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the whole world lies in the power of the evil one ” ( 1 John 5:19 ) .
That refers , of course , to Satan .
John 12:31 and 16:11 call him “ the ruler of this world , ” meaning he wields power and influence through this world ’ s political systems ( cf .
Luke 4:6 ; Ephesians 2:2 ; 6:12 ) .
Jesus said of him , “ he is a liar and the father of lies ” ( John 8:44 ) .
History is full of painful reminders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abused for evil purposes .
Politicians may manipulate statistics and the media can cover up or camouflage inconvenient truths .
So a discerning church can not passively or automatically comply if the government orders a shutdown of congregational meetings—even if the reason given is a concern for public health and safety .
The church by definition is an assembly .
That is the literal meaning of the Greek word for “ church ” —ekklesia—the assembly of the called-out ones .
A non-assembling assembly is a contradiction in terms .
Christians are therefore commanded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ together ( Hebrews 10:25 ) —and no earthly state has a right to restrict , delimit , or forbid the assembling of believers .
We have always supported the underground church in nations where Christian congregational worship is deemed illegal by the state .
When officials restrict church attendance to a certain number , they attempt to impose a restriction that in principle makes it impossible for the saints to gather as the church .
When officials prohibit singing in worship services , they attempt to impose a restriction that in principle makes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to obey the commands of Ephesians 5:19 and Colossians 3:16 .
When officials mandate distancing , they attempt to impose a restriction that in principle makes it impossible to experience the close communion between believers that is commanded in Romans 16:16 , 1 Corinthians 16:20 , 2 Corinthians 13:12 , and 1 Thessalonians 5:26 .
In all those spheres , we must submit to our Lord .
Although we in America may be unaccustomed to government intrusion into the church of our Lord Jesus Christ , this is by no means the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had to deal with government overreach or hostile rulers .
As a matter of fact , persecution of the church by government authorities has been the norm , not the exception , throughout church history .
“ Indeed , ” Scripture says , “ all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will be persecuted ” ( 2 Timothy 3:12 ) .
Historically , the two main persecutors have always been secular government and false religion .
Most of Christianity ’ s martyrs have died because they refused to obey such authorities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what Christ promised : “ If they persecuted Me , they will also persecute you ” ( John 15:20 ) .
In the last of the beatitudes , He said , “ Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you , and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me .
Rejoice and be glad , for your reward in heaven is great ; for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you ” ( Matthew 5:11–12 ) .
As government policy moves further @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legal and political pressures against the church intensify , we must recognize that the Lord may be using these pressures as means of purging to reveal the true church .
Succumbing to governmental overreach may cause churches to remain closed indefinitely .
How can the true church of Jesus Christ distinguish herself in such a hostile climate ?
There is only one way : bold allegiance to the Lord Jesus Christ .
Even where governments seem sympathetic to the church , Christian leaders have often needed to push back against aggressive state officials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for example , church officials at times needed to fend off attempts by the city council to govern aspects of worship , church polity , and church discipline .
The Church of England has never fully reformed , precisely because the British Crown and Parliament have always meddled in church affairs .
In 1662 , the Puritans were ejected from their pulpits because they refused to bow to government mandates regarding use of the Book of Common Prayer , the wearing of vestments , and other ceremonial aspects of state-regulated worship .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supreme governor and titular head of the Anglican Church .
But again : Christ is the one true head of His church , and we intend to honor that vital truth in all our gatherings .
For that preeminent reason , we can not accept and will not bow to the intrusive restrictions government officials now want to impose on our congregation .
We offer this response without rancor , and not out of hearts that are combative or rebellious ( 1 Timothy 2:1–8 ; 1 Peter 2:13–17 ) , but with a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Lord Jesus for the stewardship He has given to us as shepherds of His precious flock .
To government officials , we respectfully say with the apostles , “ Whether it is right in the sight of God to give heed to you rather than to God , you be the judge ” ( Acts 4:19 ) .
And our unhesitating reply to that question is the same as the apostles ’ : “ We must obey God rather than men ” ( Acts 5:29 ) .
Our prayer is that every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obedience to our Lord as Christians have done through the centuries .

True to form, as anyone familiar with MacArthur’s work can attest, MacArthur’s message on the topic drew heavily upon scripture for its authority.
Because he is the sort of Christian leader who doesn’t begin by asking what the popular response, or the culturally acceptable, or the pragmatic response to a difficult question might be. To the extent that he is able, he builds his answers on what the BIBLICAL response to a particular question might be.
And it just so happens that the question of State demands to curtail or limit the core activities of a biblically-faithful Church is one that has been explicitly addressed in Holy Writ.
“We thank you that we can gather and worship YOU our ROCK and our REDEEMER. We stand on Your WORD. We live by it. We love by it. We worship by it.” @johnmacarthur
Here is the response he gave to his congregation as it relates to the shutdown orders issued by Governor Newsom, as published on his Church’s website.
Christ, not Caesar, Is Head of the Church
by John MacArthur Friday, July 24, 2020A + A – RESET
A Biblical Case for the Church’s Duty to Remain Open
Christ is Lord of all. He is the one true head of the church (Ephesians 1:22; 5:23; Colossians 1:18). He is also King of kings—sovereign over every earthly authority (1 Timothy 6:15; Revelation 17:14; 19:16). Grace Community Church has always stood immovably on those biblical principles. As His people, we are subject to His will and commands as revealed in Scripture. Therefore we cannot and will not acquiesce to a government-imposed moratorium on our weekly congregational worship or other regular corporate gatherings. Compliance would be disobedience to our Lord’s clear commands.
Some will think such a firm statement is inexorably in conflict with the command to be subject to governing authorities laid out in Romans 13 and 1 Peter 2. Scripture does mandate careful, conscientious obedience to all governing authority, including kings, governors, employers, and their agents (in Peter’s words, “not only to those who are good and gentle, but also to those who are unreasonable” [1 Peter 2:18]). Insofar as government authorities do not attempt to assert ecclesiastical authority or issue orders that forbid our obedience to God’s law, their authority is to be obeyed whether we agree with their rulings or not. In other words, Romans 13 and 1 Peter 2 still bind the consciences of individual Christians. We are to obey our civil authorities as powers that God Himself has ordained.
However, while civil government is invested with divine authority to rule the state, neither of those texts (nor any other) grants civic rulers jurisdiction over the church. God has established three institutions within human society: the family, the state, and the church. Each institution has a sphere of authority with jurisdictional limits that must be respected. A father’s authority is limited to his own family. Church leaders’ authority (which is delegated to them by Christ) is limited to church matters. And government is specifically tasked with the oversight and protection of civic peace and well-being within the boundaries of a nation or community. God has not granted civic rulers authority over the doctrine, practice, or polity of the church. The biblical framework limits the authority of each institution to its specific jurisdiction. The church does not have the right to meddle in the affairs of individual families and ignore parental authority. Parents do not have authority to manage civil matters while circumventing government officials. And similarly, government officials have no right to interfere in ecclesiastical matters in a way that undermines or disregards the God-given authority of pastors and elders.
When any one of the three institutions exceeds the bounds of its jurisdiction it is the duty of the other institutions to curtail that overreach. Therefore, when any government official issues orders regulating worship (such as bans on singing, caps on attendance, or prohibitions against gatherings and services), he steps outside the legitimate bounds of his God-ordained authority as a civic official and arrogates to himself authority that God expressly grants only to the Lord Jesus Christ as sovereign over His Kingdom, which is the church. His rule is mediated to local churches through those pastors and elders who teach His Word (Matthew 16:18–19; 2 Timothy 3:16–4:2).
Therefore, in response to the recent state order requiring churches in California to limit or suspend all meetings indefinitely, we, the pastors and elders of Grace Community Church, respectfully inform our civic leaders that they have exceeded their legitimate jurisdiction, and faithfulness to Christ prohibits us from observing the restrictions they want to impose on our corporate worship services.
Said another way, it has never been the prerogative of civil government to order, modify, forbid, or mandate worship. When, how, and how often the church worships is not subject to Caesar. Caesar himself is subject to God. Jesus affirmed that principle when He told Pilate, “You would have no authority over Me, unless it had been given you from above” (John 19:11). And because Christ is head of the church, ecclesiastical matters pertain to His Kingdom, not Caesar’s. Jesus drew a stark distinction between those two kingdoms when He said, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s” (Mark 12:17). Our Lord Himself always rendered to Caesar what was Caesar’s, but He never offered to Caesar what belongs solely to God.
As pastors and elders, we cannot hand over to earthly authorities any privilege or power that belongs solely to Christ as head of His church. Pastors and elders are the ones to whom Christ has given the duty and the right to exercise His spiritual authority in the church (1 Peter 5:1–4; Hebrews 13:7, 17)—and Scripture alone defines how and whom they are to serve (1 Corinthians 4:1–4). They have no duty to follow orders from a civil government attempting to regulate the worship or governance of the church. In fact, pastors who cede their Christ-delegated authority in the church to a civil ruler have abdicated their responsibility before their Lord and violated the God-ordained spheres of authority as much as the secular official who illegitimately imposes his authority upon the church. Our church’s doctrinal statement has included this paragraph for more than 40 years:
We teach the autonomy of the local church, free from any external authority or control, with the right of self-government and freedom from the interference of any hierarchy of individuals or organizations (Titus 1:5). We teach that it is scriptural for true churches to cooperate with each other for the presentation and propagation of the faith. Each local church, however, through its elders and their interpretation and application of Scripture, should be the sole judge of the measure and method of its cooperation. The elders should determine all other matters of membership, policy, discipline, benevolence, and government as well (Acts 15:19–31; 20:28; 1 Corinthians 5:4–7, 13; 1 Peter 5:1–4).
In short, as the church, we do not need the state’s permission to serve and worship our Lord as He has commanded. The church is Christ’s precious bride (2 Corinthians 11:2; Ephesians 5:23–27). She belongs to Him alone. She exists by His will and serves under His authority. He will tolerate no assault on her purity and no infringement of His headship over her. All of that was established when Jesus said, “I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it” (Matthew 16:18).
Christ’s own authority is “far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come. And [God the Father has] put all things in subjection under [Christ’s] feet, and gave Him as head over all things to the church, which is His body, the fullness of Him who fills all in all” (Ephesians 1:21–23).
Accordingly, the honor that we rightly owe our earthly governors and magistrates (Romans 13:7) does not include compliance when such officials attempt to subvert sound doctrine, corrupt biblical morality, exercise ecclesiastical authority, or supplant Christ as head of the church in any other way.
The biblical order is clear: Christ is Lord over Caesar, not vice versa. Christ, not Caesar, is head of the church. Conversely, the church does not in any sense rule the state. Again, these are distinct kingdoms, and Christ is sovereign over both. Neither church nor state has any higher authority than that of Christ Himself, who declared, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth” (Matthew 28:18).
Notice that we are not making a constitutional argument, even though the First Amendment of the United States Constitution expressly affirms this principle in its opening words: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” The right we are appealing to was not created by the Constitution. It is one of those unalienable rights granted solely by God, who ordained human government and establishes both the extent and the limitations of the state’s authority (Romans 13:1–7). Our argument therefore is purposely not grounded in the First Amendment; it is based on the same biblical principles that the Amendment itself is founded upon. The exercise of true religion is a divine duty given to men and women created in God’s image (Genesis 1:26–27; Acts 4:18–20; 5:29; cf. Matthew 22:16–22). In other words, freedom of worship is a command of God, not a privilege granted by the state.
An additional point needs to be made in this context. Christ is always faithful and true (Revelation 19:11). Human governments are not so trustworthy. Scripture says, “the whole world lies in the power of the evil one” (1 John 5:19). That refers, of course, to Satan. John 12:31 and 16:11 call him “the ruler of this world,” meaning he wields power and influence through this world’s political systems (cf. Luke 4:6; Ephesians 2:2; 6:12). Jesus said of him, “he is a liar and the father of lies” (John 8:44). History is full of painful reminders that government power is easily and frequently abused for evil purposes. Politicians may manipulate statistics and the media can cover up or camouflage inconvenient truths. So a discerning church cannot passively or automatically comply if the government orders a shutdown of congregational meetings—even if the reason given is a concern for public health and safety.
The church by definition is an assembly. That is the literal meaning of the Greek word for “church”—ekklesia—the assembly of the called-out ones. A non-assembling assembly is a contradiction in terms. Christians are therefore commanded not to forsake the practice of meeting together (Hebrews 10:25)—and no earthly state has a right to restrict, delimit, or forbid the assembling of believers. We have always supported the underground church in nations where Christian congregational worship is deemed illegal by the state.
When officials restrict church attendance to a certain number, they attempt to impose a restriction that in principle makes it impossible for the saints to gather as the church. When officials prohibit singing in worship services, they attempt to impose a restriction that in principle makes it impossible for the people of God to obey the commands of Ephesians 5:19 and Colossians 3:16. When officials mandate distancing, they attempt to impose a restriction that in principle makes it impossible to experience the close communion between believers that is commanded in Romans 16:16, 1 Corinthians 16:20, 2 Corinthians 13:12, and 1 Thessalonians 5:26. In all those spheres, we must submit to our Lord.
Although we in America may be unaccustomed to government intrusion into the church of our Lord Jesus Christ, this is by no means the first time in church history that Christians have had to deal with government overreach or hostile rulers. As a matter of fact, persecution of the church by government authorities has been the norm, not the exception, throughout church history. “Indeed,” Scripture says, “all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will be persecuted” (2 Timothy 3:12). Historically, the two main persecutors have always been secular government and false religion. Most of Christianity’s martyrs have died because they refused to obey such authorities. This is, after all, what Christ promised: “If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you” (John 15:20). In the last of the beatitudes, He said, “Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward in heaven is great; for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you” (Matthew 5:11–12).
As government policy moves further away from biblical principles, and as legal and political pressures against the church intensify, we must recognize that the Lord may be using these pressures as means of purging to reveal the true church. Succumbing to governmental overreach may cause churches to remain closed indefinitely. How can the true church of Jesus Christ distinguish herself in such a hostile climate? There is only one way: bold allegiance to the Lord Jesus Christ.
Even where governments seem sympathetic to the church, Christian leaders have often needed to push back against aggressive state officials. In Calvin’s Geneva, for example, church officials at times needed to fend off attempts by the city council to govern aspects of worship, church polity, and church discipline. The Church of England has never fully reformed, precisely because the British Crown and Parliament have always meddled in church affairs. In 1662, the Puritans were ejected from their pulpits because they refused to bow to government mandates regarding use of the Book of Common Prayer, the wearing of vestments, and other ceremonial aspects of state-regulated worship. The British Monarch still claims to be the supreme governor and titular head of the Anglican Church.
But again: Christ is the one true head of His church, and we intend to honor that vital truth in all our gatherings. For that preeminent reason, we cannot accept and will not bow to the intrusive restrictions government officials now want to impose on our congregation. We offer this response without rancor, and not out of hearts that are combative or rebellious (1 Timothy 2:1–8; 1 Peter 2:13–17), but with a sobering awareness that we must answer to the Lord Jesus for the stewardship He has given to us as shepherds of His precious flock.
To government officials, we respectfully say with the apostles, “Whether it is right in the sight of God to give heed to you rather than to God, you be the judge” (Acts 4:19). And our unhesitating reply to that question is the same as the apostles’: “We must obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29).
Our prayer is that every faithful congregation will stand with us in obedience to our Lord as Christians have done through the centuries.


clashdaily--2020-07-27--WATCH: Bro Calls Out Hypocrisy Of Protesters And It’s EPIC–‘You Guys Are Crooks And Fools’

This guy hits these supposedly ‘ woke ’ protesters with a direct hit … and he ’ s hitting them with a howitzer .
How much do you REALLY care about the very oppression you claim to oppose ?
How is it that monuments to men dead for more than a century offend Leftists so deeply that they can not even feel safe in their presence , but markets that exist in the world today , were humans are CURRENTLY being bought and sold in the marketplace don ’ t even warrant a mention ?
How is it that Donald @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dangerous despot , but the atrocities happening in Communist China ’ s concentration camps were hundreds of thousands are unjustly imprisoned today , and their wives are raped and impregnated by men sent by the state to ‘ erase ’ their religion and ethnicity ?
How is it that national brands — including brands that throw money at BLM to show how much they hate ‘ oppression ’ — have their goods manufactured by Uigher workers forced into slave labor ?
How is it that Colin Kaepernick — a onetime BLM spokesperson — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anthem ‘ because there is a reference to slavery ’ in a verse nobody sings , but has no problem cashing Multi-million dollar checks from Nike and their Slave Labor ?
Trending : FDNY : White Firefighter From Iconic 9/11 Photo Is Kicked Off Of Color Guard… Sues For Racial Bias This is a really great rant .
You will enjoy how he torches the Left ’ s hypocrisy here .
Where are the protesters lining up to oppose Iran for imprisoning women for 30 years if they dare to be seen without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s right .
Iran gets a pass from them , don ’ t they ?
He wants Trump to take the 2020 election .
Because he sees the left as nothing but crooks or fools .
They are either too dumb to see how their ideas don ’ t play out in the real world , or they absolutely KNOW , and are deliberately lying about it .

This guy hits these supposedly ‘woke’ protesters with a direct hit … and he’s hitting them with a howitzer. How much do you REALLY care about the very oppression you claim to oppose?
How is it that monuments to men dead for more than a century offend Leftists so deeply that they cannot even feel safe in their presence, but markets that exist in the world today, were humans are CURRENTLY being bought and sold in the marketplace don’t even warrant a mention?
How is it that Donald Trump is the world’s most dangerous despot, but the atrocities happening in Communist China’s concentration camps were hundreds of thousands are unjustly imprisoned today, and their wives are raped and impregnated by men sent by the state to ‘erase’ their religion and ethnicity?
How is it that national brands — including brands that throw money at BLM to show how much they hate ‘oppression’ — have their goods manufactured by Uigher workers forced into slave labor? How is it that Colin Kaepernick — a onetime BLM spokesperson — cannot bear to hear the National Anthem ‘because there is a reference to slavery’ in a verse nobody sings, but has no problem cashing Multi-million dollar checks from Nike and their Slave Labor?
See a pattern forming here?
This is a really great rant. You will enjoy how he torches the Left’s hypocrisy here.
(Fair warning: there’s some profanity in it)
Where are the protesters lining up to oppose Iran for imprisoning women for 30 years if they dare to be seen without a headscarf?
Oh, that’s right. Iran gets a pass from them, don’t they?
He wants Trump to take the 2020 election. Because he sees the left as nothing but crooks or fools. They are either too dumb to see how their ideas don’t play out in the real world, or they absolutely KNOW, and are deliberately lying about it.


clashdaily--2020-07-27--The U.S. Constitution and State Constitution

I feel there needs to be some clarification when it comes to discussing the First Amendment of the United States Constitution , which is as follows : Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion , or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ; or abridging the freedom of speech , or of the press , or the right of the people peaceably to assemble , and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances .
One might take notice that this restriction of power applies to Congress ( and thus the federal government ) but does not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should not only look to the United States Constitution when it comes to freedom of speech , the press , assembly , petitioning the government , and religion , but they should also examine each states ’ constitution .
Trending : FDNY : White Firefighter From Iconic 9/11 Photo Is Kicked Off Of Color Guard… Sues For Racial Bias For the most part , each of the state constitutions guarantees these rights listed in the First Amendment .
Some of these constitutions also guarantee other rights mentioned in the Constitution , e.g .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ laws , habeas corpus , excessive bail , cruel & unusual punishments , and search & seizure .
The Kentucky State Constitution is a case in point , and states the following in regards to such rights : • The right of worshipping Almighty God according to the dictates of their consciences .
• The right of freely communicating their thoughts and opinions .
• The right of assembling together in a peaceable manner for their common good , and of applying to those invested with the power of government for redress of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ petition , address or remonstrance .
In addition , the Kentucky State Constitution further discusses some of these rights , e.g .
religious freedom , freedom of the speech , and of the press .
It also guarantees the rights mentioned in the United States Constitution , e.g .
search & seizure , the right to a trial by jury , cruel & unusual punishment , ex post facto laws , habeas corpus , double jeopardy .
Meanwhile , the right to bear arms is not only guaranteed in the Second Amendment of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in nearly every state constitution .
The Virginia State Constitution is a case in point , with wording similar to that of the Second Amendment .
So when a state and/or local official decides to infringe upon the freedom of speech , freedom of the press , the right to assembly , the right to petition the government , freedom of religion , the right to bear arms , etc.
, don ’ t just rely on the United States Constitution to point out that his or her actions are unconstitutional .
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ respective state , and point out the rights that are guaranteed by it to your state and/or local official ( s ) .

I feel there needs to be some clarification when it comes to discussing the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which is as follows:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
One might take notice that this restriction of power applies to Congress (and thus the federal government) but does not apply to the states.
So people should not only look to the United States Constitution when it comes to freedom of speech, the press, assembly, petitioning the government, and religion, but they should also examine each states’ constitution.
For the most part, each of the state constitutions guarantees these rights listed in the First Amendment. Some of these constitutions also guarantee other rights mentioned in the Constitution, e.g. trial by jury, ex post facto laws, habeas corpus, excessive bail, cruel & unusual punishments, and search & seizure.
The Kentucky State Constitution is a case in point, and states the following in regards to such rights:
The right of worshipping Almighty God according to the dictates of their consciences.
The right of freely communicating their thoughts and opinions.
The right of assembling together in a peaceable manner for their common good, and of applying to those invested with the power of government for redress of grievances or other proper purposes, by petition, address or remonstrance.
In addition, the Kentucky State Constitution further discusses some of these rights, e.g. religious freedom, freedom of the speech, and of the press. It also guarantees the rights mentioned in the United States Constitution, e.g. search & seizure, the right to a trial by jury, cruel & unusual punishment, ex post facto laws, habeas corpus, double jeopardy.
Meanwhile, the right to bear arms is not only guaranteed in the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, but also in nearly every state constitution. The Virginia State Constitution is a case in point, with wording similar to that of the Second Amendment.
So when a state and/or local official decides to infringe upon the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assembly, the right to petition the government, freedom of religion, the right to bear arms, etc., don’t just rely on the United States Constitution to point out that his or her actions are unconstitutional. You should also read the constitution of your respective state, and point out the rights that are guaranteed by it to your state and/or local official(s).


clashdaily--2020-07-26--Thanks to Illegal Immigration, California Has Too Many Reps… Taken From These States

The Left isn ’ t just desperate to keep illegal immigrants pouring into the nation , they are also desperate to have their numbers count in a census .
There is a Machiavellian reason they would want that .
Illegal immigrants can not lawfully vote ( but the left is working on that , too ) but they CAN influence an election .
By having their numbers count in a census .
The more people that get counted in the census , the greater percentage of the national population a particular Sanctuary State can have .
Trending : FDNY : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kicked Off Of Color Guard… Sues For Racial Bias And what becomes of states with a greater percentage of the national population ?
They shift the share of representatives from other states to their own .
In effect , the presence of illegal immigrants in California , for example , will disenfranchise whichever smaller states it bleeds reps away from .
This is a literal disenfranchisement of American voters .
And the Left loves it for exactly one reason .
It will always shift the balance of power in the direction of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump signed an executive order to prevent illegal immigrants from being counted for the purposes of re-drawing congressional districts after the 2020 census .
The order , “ Ensuring American Citizens Receive Proper Representation in Congress ” comes after the Supreme Court last year blocked a citizenship question from being included in the Census and sent the question back to lower courts , claiming that the administration ’ s reasoning for the question was insufficient .
…According to an analysis from Unbiased America , Blue States with large illegal alien populations like California @ @ @ @ @ @ @ due to their non-citizens .
— Bongino Report Here is the impact potential of those numbers : California : +6 representatives ( 11.3 % of its current representatives ) Florida : +1 representative ( 4.0 % ) New York : +1 representative ( 3.4 % ) Texas : +1 representative ( 3.1 % ) Because the House of Representatives is currently fixed by law at 435 members , states that have fewer illegal aliens and non-citizens lose representatives as a result .
The following states have fewer representatives than they would if undocumented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Mississippi : -1 representative ( 25.0 % of its current representatives ) Oklahoma : -1 representative ( 20.0 % ) Kentucky : -1 representative ( 16.7 % ) South Carolina : -1 representative ( 16.7 % ) Wisconsin : -1 representative ( 12.5 % ) Indiana : -1 representative ( 11.1 % ) Michigan : -1 representative ( 6.7 % ) Ohio : -1 representative ( 5.6 % ) Pennsylvania : -1 representative ( 5.3 % ) The Census is also used to allocate federal funds , and states with more illegal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government at the expense of those with smaller illegal alien populations .
— Bongino Report Do you remember which one group of illegal immigration Obama put a stop to during his Presidency ?
In his final month of office , he did this : Obama ends ‘ wet foot , dry foot ’ policy for Cubans Was it because the people risking being eaten alive by sharks on a 70-mile journey using improvised boats were suddenly no longer oppressed in Cuba ?
Or did Obama know that lawful Cuban refugees were helping pull @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the political right ?

The Left isn’t just desperate to keep illegal immigrants pouring into the nation, they are also desperate to have their numbers count in a census. There is a Machiavellian reason they would want that.
Illegal immigrants cannot lawfully vote (but the left is working on that, too) but they CAN influence an election.
How?
By having their numbers count in a census. The more people that get counted in the census, the greater percentage of the national population a particular Sanctuary State can have.
And what becomes of states with a greater percentage of the national population? They shift the share of representatives from other states to their own. In effect, the presence of illegal immigrants in California, for example, will disenfranchise whichever smaller states it bleeds reps away from.
This is a literal disenfranchisement of American voters. And the Left loves it for exactly one reason. It will always shift the balance of power in the direction of the Democrats.
On Tuesday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to prevent illegal immigrants from being counted for the purposes of re-drawing congressional districts after the 2020 census. The order, “Ensuring American Citizens Receive Proper Representation in Congress” comes after the Supreme Court last year blocked a citizenship question from being included in the Census and sent the question back to lower courts, claiming that the administration’s reasoning for the question was insufficient. …According to an analysis from Unbiased America, Blue States with large illegal alien populations like California are benefiting massively in terms of representation due to their non-citizens. — Bongino Report
Here is the impact potential of those numbers:
California: +6 representatives (11.3% of its current representatives)
Florida: +1 representative (4.0%)
New York: +1 representative (3.4%)
Texas: +1 representative (3.1%)
Because the House of Representatives is currently fixed by law at 435 members, states that have fewer illegal aliens and non-citizens lose representatives as a result. The following states have fewer representatives than they would if undocumented immigrants were not counted in the calculation: Mississippi: -1 representative (25.0% of its current representatives)
Oklahoma: -1 representative (20.0%)
Kentucky: -1 representative (16.7%)
South Carolina: -1 representative (16.7%)
Wisconsin: -1 representative (12.5%)
Indiana: -1 representative (11.1%)
Michigan: -1 representative (6.7%)
Ohio: -1 representative (5.6%)
Pennsylvania: -1 representative (5.3%)
The Census is also used to allocate federal funds, and states with more illegal immigrants thus receive more from the federal government at the expense of those with smaller illegal alien populations. — Bongino Report
Do you remember which one group of illegal immigration Obama put a stop to during his Presidency? In his final month of office, he did this: Obama ends ‘wet foot, dry foot’ policy for Cubans
Was it because the people risking being eaten alive by sharks on a 70-mile journey using improvised boats were suddenly no longer oppressed in Cuba?
Or did Obama know that lawful Cuban refugees were helping pull the important swing State of Florida to the political right?


clashdaily--2020-07-26--ICYMI: Mike Adams Rallies NC Patriots To Defy Governor During COVID Lockdown

Sadly , as we have reported elsewhere , Mike Adams ’ s life has come to its end .
But rather than dwell on those final moments of his life , we ’ d like to remember him for his uncanny ability to encourage others to stand strong .
Mike Adams died recently .
And the cause of his death is now known , he was shot .
His death was discovered during a wellness check .
The nature of the death , whether suicide or violence has not been disclosed .
But what we do know , in either @ @ @ @ @ @ @ focus of an extended and very public campaign against him to discredit and destroy him as a professor at UNCW .
This battle has gone on for years , ever since he was passed over for tenure on account of his private political views expressed away from the campus .
He won in court .
Trending : FDNY : White Firefighter From Iconic 9/11 Photo Is Kicked Off Of Color Guard… Sues For Racial Bias Even so , his more recent comment deriding Governor Moore — the same man he fought and beat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his draconian use of power led to a large petition that got him ‘ canceled ’ .
The following was published on July 2nd .
We note that both his job and his reputation were targeted : UNC Wilmington is paying professor Mike Adams more than $ 500,000 in an agreement that resulted in his early retirement , which was announced Monday .
Adams has sparked controversy at the university for more than a decade , particularly and most recently surrounding his comments on social media .
Adams , a 55-year-old tenured criminology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Aug. 1 , before the fall semester begins .
…Four different change.org petitions popped up calling for UNCW to get rid of Adams in early June that had about 120,000 signatures .
“ ( Adams ) has a long history of espousing racist , misogynistic , homophobic , and abusive rhetoric .
There have been previous demands to remove him , however he remains , ” one of the petitions states .
— NewsObserver That was less than a month ago .
Now , he is dead of a gunshot wound .
Whether @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or someone else ’ s it is difficult not to speculate a connection between this public destruction of who he is and being forced out of his employment over a derisive tweet to his unfortunate end .
For some better context on why he might have worded the particular tweet that ended his career in the particular way that he phrased it , here he is addressing an outdoor rally for Patriots who objected to the trampling of Constitutional rights in the name of Coronavirus .
It was the “ ReOpen NC ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to exert their fundamental rights .
He used his own fight — and victory !
— as a context for other patriots to consider their own situation and ability to stand and fight against violations of THEIR Constitutional rights .
It is only 3 minutes long , but it is , as the kids say , ‘ FIRE ’ .
Is it at all possible that the Professor they were so hellbent on destroying personally and professionally was actually making an intelligent point ?
Could he have been addressing specifically Roy Cooper , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violated Mike ’ s constitutional rights once before , and now was doing so again by creating mandates restricting behavior that did not even bother to go through the process through which any other binding legislation would be obligated to proceed ?
A slaveowner is a man who immorally abridges the rights of another man , forcing his compliance in ways for which he has no moral right to do so .
When Adams used the term “ Massa Cooper ” to describe Roy Cooper ’ s behavior as Governor , is it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being in some way ‘ racist ’ or in some other sense racially insensitive toward black Americans whose ancestors may have once been owned as slaves , OR is it more rational to believe he was pointing out a different fact about Governor Cooper ’ s treatment of free American citizens of North Carolina ?
Namely , that for Gov Cooper to abridge the rights of free Americans in the way that he has stands on grounds that are JUST as morally unjustifiable and legally dubious as the practice of one man owning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nation filled with people Hellbent on comparing practically EVERYONE to Adolph Hitler would understand how he might have meant the latter .
Perhaps soon we might all realize that this impulse to destroy people over ideological disagreements is turning us into a totalitarian state of a different kind… the kind that historically , doesn ’ t spare those in the inner circle , but which eventually uses the very same tools of personal destruction to have rivals shot in a nondescript room in the basement of some gulag .
Read Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you think there is such a great leap between the two .
I had the distinct privilege of meeting Adams once , many years ago .
I was saddened to hear of his passing .

***UPDATE: July 28, 2020 12:00PM EST***
It’s with a heavy heart that we report that Mike Adams’s death has been ruled a suicide.
Mike Adams, 55, a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington, was found dead alone in his home Thursday from a self-inflicted gunshot wound after a friend called New Hanover County sheriff’s deputies to check on him, The News & Observer reports. Adams had been acting “erratic” in the past few weeks, during which he was “under a lot of stress,” his friend told a dispatcher, according to 911 call records cited by the newspaper. Sheriff officials said foul play is not expected in Adams’ death, which was ruled a suicide following an investigation, the newspaper reports. Source: New York Post
***END UPDATE***
Sadly, as we have reported elsewhere, Mike Adams’s life has come to its end. But rather than dwell on those final moments of his life, we’d like to remember him for his uncanny ability to encourage others to stand strong.
Mike Adams died recently. And the cause of his death is now known, he was shot. His death was discovered during a wellness check.
The nature of the death, whether suicide or violence has not been disclosed. But what we do know, in either case, is that he was the focus of an extended and very public campaign against him to discredit and destroy him as a professor at UNCW.
This battle has gone on for years, ever since he was passed over for tenure on account of his private political views expressed away from the campus. He won in court.
Even so, his more recent comment deriding Governor Moore — the same man he fought and beat in his 7-year court battle — over his draconian use of power led to a large petition that got him ‘canceled’.
The following was published on July 2nd. We note that both his job and his reputation were targeted:
UNC Wilmington is paying professor Mike Adams more than $500,000 in an agreement that resulted in his early retirement, which was announced Monday. Adams has sparked controversy at the university for more than a decade, particularly and most recently surrounding his comments on social media. Adams, a 55-year-old tenured criminology professor, will retire from UNCW on Aug. 1, before the fall semester begins. …Four different change.org petitions popped up calling for UNCW to get rid of Adams in early June that had about 120,000 signatures. “(Adams) has a long history of espousing racist, misogynistic, homophobic, and abusive rhetoric. There have been previous demands to remove him, however he remains,” one of the petitions states. — NewsObserver
That was less than a month ago. Now, he is dead of a gunshot wound. Whether it was by his own hand, or someone else’s it is difficult not to speculate a connection between this public destruction of who he is and being forced out of his employment over a derisive tweet to his unfortunate end.
For some better context on why he might have worded the particular tweet that ended his career in the particular way that he phrased it, here he is addressing an outdoor rally for Patriots who objected to the trampling of Constitutional rights in the name of Coronavirus. It was the “ReOpen NC” event… where he called on business owners to exert their fundamental rights.
He used his own fight — and victory! — as a context for other patriots to consider their own situation and ability to stand and fight against violations of THEIR Constitutional rights.
It is only 3 minutes long, but it is, as the kids say, ‘FIRE’.
So…
Is it at all possible that the Professor they were so hellbent on destroying personally and professionally was actually making an intelligent point?
Could he have been addressing specifically Roy Cooper, who even the COURTS agreed had personally violated Mike’s constitutional rights once before, and now was doing so again by creating mandates restricting behavior that did not even bother to go through the process through which any other binding legislation would be obligated to proceed?
A slaveowner is a man who immorally abridges the rights of another man, forcing his compliance in ways for which he has no moral right to do so.
When Adams used the term “Massa Cooper” to describe Roy Cooper’s behavior as Governor, is it more rational to claim that he was being in some way ‘racist’ or in some other sense racially insensitive toward black Americans whose ancestors may have once been owned as slaves, OR is it more rational to believe he was pointing out a different fact about Governor Cooper’s treatment of free American citizens of North Carolina? Namely, that for Gov Cooper to abridge the rights of free Americans in the way that he has stands on grounds that are JUST as morally unjustifiable and legally dubious as the practice of one man owning another?
You’d think a nation filled with people Hellbent on comparing practically EVERYONE to Adolph Hitler would understand how he might have meant the latter.
Perhaps soon we might all realize that this impulse to destroy people over ideological disagreements is turning us into a totalitarian state of a different kind… the kind that historically, doesn’t spare those in the inner circle, but which eventually uses the very same tools of personal destruction to have rivals shot in a nondescript room in the basement of some gulag.
Read Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s seminal work on the topic if you think there is such a great leap between the two.
I had the distinct privilege of meeting Adams once, many years ago. I was saddened to hear of his passing.


clashdaily--2020-07-26--Mask Gestapo: Cali Woman Blasts Strangers With MACE For EATING In A Park With No Mask

This macing sure sounds like assault , don ’ t you think ?
A couple were eating food in a park when some wizard walked up on them , saw they were NOT wearing a mask while enjoying a meal , and proceeded to blast both the couple AND their food with Mace .
Our society has officially gone off the deep end on this one .
Whatever the original intent might have been , masks are not worn in the hopes of preventing the transmission of the virus .
They are the ChinaVirus has become an equivalent of seeing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ team ’ s Jersey to a home game .
Trending : FDNY : White Firefighter From Iconic 9/11 Photo Is Kicked Off Of Color Guard… Sues For Racial Bias Oh , he ’ s cheering for the cross-town rivals , is he ?
Get him !
Only instead of some drunken frat boys punking you , it ’ s an overbearing middle-aged chick with a can of mace and an overdeveloped sense of entitlement .
‘ We were not wearing masks because we were eating .
You can ’ t wear a mask @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ wrote O ’ Brien in a Facebook post .
‘ Then she started saying more stuff and I told her to leave the park and stop harassing us.
’ O ’ Brien said the woman then approached the table the couple was eating at and without warning aimed the pepper spray .
‘ She then came right up to our table wear we were eating , pointed the mace at me first and got a little on me , and then my husband stepped in and took the entire can , ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drove to the hospital for Kelley to receive medical treatment afterwards .
Now , they want the woman to face jail time and have filed a misdemeanor battery report with the local police department .
‘ I want her to go to jail , she assaulted my husband , and I ’ m angry about it , ’ O ’ Brien told ABC 10 —DailyMail What kind of a self-important herridan do you have to be to walk up to someone minding their own business and hitting them with something that will require @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must you have for the lives and wellbeing of strangers ?
And why do these chicks always look like the old lady Before picture in a Jenny Craig ad ?

This macing sure sounds like assault, don’t you think?
A couple were eating food in a park when some wizard walked up on them, saw they were NOT wearing a mask while enjoying a meal, and proceeded to blast both the couple AND their food with Mace.
Our society has officially gone off the deep end on this one.
Whatever the original intent might have been, masks are not worn in the hopes of preventing the transmission of the virus. They are the ChinaVirus has become an equivalent of seeing whether the other guy is wearing your team’s Jersey to a home game.
Oh, he’s cheering for the cross-town rivals, is he? Get him!
Only instead of some drunken frat boys punking you, it’s an overbearing middle-aged chick with a can of mace and an overdeveloped sense of entitlement.
‘We were not wearing masks because we were eating. You can’t wear a mask and eat at the same time,’ wrote O’Brien in a Facebook post. ‘Then she started saying more stuff and I told her to leave the park and stop harassing us.’ O’Brien said the woman then approached the table the couple was eating at and without warning aimed the pepper spray. ‘She then came right up to our table wear we were eating, pointed the mace at me first and got a little on me, and then my husband stepped in and took the entire can,’ wrote O’Brien. The couple drove to the hospital for Kelley to receive medical treatment afterwards. Now, they want the woman to face jail time and have filed a misdemeanor battery report with the local police department. ‘I want her to go to jail, she assaulted my husband, and I’m angry about it,’ O’Brien told ABC 10 —DailyMail
Doesn’t she sound wonderful?
What kind of a self-important herridan do you have to be to walk up to someone minding their own business and hitting them with something that will require medical treatment? And how little regard must you have for the lives and wellbeing of strangers?
And why do these chicks always look like the old lady Before picture in a Jenny Craig ad?


clashdaily--2020-07-26--Judge Shoots Down Pelosi’s ‘Stormtrooper’ Talking Point… Upholds Federal Action In Portland

Portland ’ s mayor desperately wants federal law enforcement to just go away .
The feds told him they ’ re doing their job and maybe he should start doing his .
The judge casts the deciding vote .
Portland has been under a constant seige by rioters for more than 50 days .
There has been violence .
There has been destruction .
Local or state officials have done nothing to tame these riots .
So the Feds stepped in and operated in such capacities as their jurisdiction can allow .
It appears to have included the arrest of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rioters .
Trending : FDNY : White Firefighter From Iconic 9/11 Photo Is Kicked Off Of Color Guard… Sues For Racial Bias Naturally , the agitators were NOT happy about a grownup stepping into the situation and telling the spoiled toddlers ‘ no ’ for a change .
So the toddlers cried for mama , and the Mayor went to court .
A federal judge on Friday denied a request from the Oregon attorney general seeking a temporary restraining order against federal officers in Portland .
In court documents obtained by KOIN 6 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mosman found the state of Oregon “ lacks standing ” in its attempt to limit federal agents ’ efforts in the state ’ s most populous city .
The attorney general ’ s restraining order request sought restrictions , such as requiring federal officers to identify themselves before making an arrest and explain to a person why they were being detained .
It also sought to block any arrests that lacked probable cause .
“ It is not unusual , following major protests , for some of the people involved to allege that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the course of their interactions , ” stated Mosman .
“ It is also common for these interactions to result in lawsuits , with protesters contending the police violated their First and Fourth Amendment rights and seeking redress by money damages and injunctive relief .
There is a well established body of law paving the way for such lawsuits to move forward in federal court .
This is not such a lawsuit .
It is a very different case , a highly unusual one with a particular set of rules.
” —KOIN Yet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guilty ’ of remaining within the limits of his actual Article II authority as defined by the Constitution .
He ’ s not very good at being a dictator , now is he ?
Almost as bad at being a dictator as he is at being a racist .
Has anyone yet pointed to a single instance of someone calling him a bigot before the day he came down that escalator with an ( R ) after his name ?

Portland’s mayor desperately wants federal law enforcement to just go away. The feds told him they’re doing their job and maybe he should start doing his. The judge casts the deciding vote.
Portland has been under a constant seige by rioters for more than 50 days.
There has been violence. There has been destruction. Local or state officials have done nothing to tame these riots. So the Feds stepped in and operated in such capacities as their jurisdiction can allow.
It appears to have included the arrest of certain key agitators from the group of rioters.
Naturally, the agitators were NOT happy about a grownup stepping into the situation and telling the spoiled toddlers ‘no’ for a change.
So the toddlers cried for mama, and the Mayor went to court.
The Mayor promptly lost.
A federal judge on Friday denied a request from the Oregon attorney general seeking a temporary restraining order against federal officers in Portland. In court documents obtained by KOIN 6 News, U.S. District Judge Michael W. Mosman found the state of Oregon “lacks standing” in its attempt to limit federal agents’ efforts in the state’s most populous city. The attorney general’s restraining order request sought restrictions, such as requiring federal officers to identify themselves before making an arrest and explain to a person why they were being detained. It also sought to block any arrests that lacked probable cause. “It is not unusual, following major protests, for some of the people involved to allege that the police crossed a line—a constitutional line—in the course of their interactions,” stated Mosman. “It is also common for these interactions to result in lawsuits, with protesters contending the police violated their First and Fourth Amendment rights and seeking redress by money damages and injunctive relief. There is a well established body of law paving the way for such lawsuits to move forward in federal court. This is not such a lawsuit. It is a very different case, a highly unusual one with a particular set of rules.” —KOIN
Yet again, Trump has been found ‘guilty’ of remaining within the limits of his actual Article II authority as defined by the Constitution.
He’s not very good at being a dictator, now is he? Almost as bad at being a dictator as he is at being a racist.
Has anyone yet pointed to a single instance of someone calling him a bigot before the day he came down that escalator with an (R) after his name?
I’m guessing ‘no’.


clashdaily--2020-07-25--Outspoken Black Man Shot Dead In Milwaukee… Hours After He Openly Supported Trump

Just a few hours after giving a video interview explaining his support for Trump , Sixty-year old Bernell Trammell was shot dead near the very spot it was filmed .
Police are looking for ‘ unknown suspects ’ in the murder , and it is not yet certain if the man was murdered over his outspoken support of Trump .
Kevan Penvose wrote on Facebook that Trammell “ was a man with whom I hardly ever agreed about anything he wrote on his signs , but also , as a Rasta street preacher , he was one of the people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Around 12:30 this afternoon I heard gunshots nearby as I was working at my dining room table .
Soon after , I was reading reports on social media of a shooting around the block , at the location of this one-of-a-kind storefront that I ’ ve walked by a million times… Peace and light , Ras Bernell.
” Armstrong Ramsone ( the pen name of local artist and writer Adebisi Agoro ) wrote on the site The God Degree that he recorded video interviews with Trammell just hours before his death .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ me ‘ you wouldn ’ t guess the amount of hate I received from Black people , ’ ” he wrote .
Agoro became curious about Trammell ’ s political beliefs after seeing him at a bus stop and decided to ask “ about what I saw on Facebook and why he was holding the Trump sign ?
” Agoro recorded videos of an interview he conducted that day in which Trammell , clutching a pro Trump sign , explains his political beliefs .
You can see those videos here .
Trending : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Photo Is Kicked Off Of Color Guard… Sues For Racial Bias “ I have encouraged Afro-Americans from all walks of life and culture here in Wisconsin and particularly here in Milwaukee to vote Donald Trump for this year .
Trump 2020 .
I believe Trump is the sign of the times , ” Trammell says in one of the videos , recorded outside his publishing business near the very spot where he would be shot a few hours later .
He is standing in front of a “ Wisconsin Vote Donald Trump ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ less than two hours after I left from filming Ras Bernell I had heard word from Facebook that the someone in the area that Ras Bernell stays in had been shot , ” Ransome wrote on The God Degree .
“ To my surprise it was Ras Bernell .
The moment I had read the news I was attempting to upload the above videos used in this post onto my laptop for use…He was murdered right outside of his shop where we were just speaking .
His home .
Seemingly these were his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him are already speculating that this is what got him killed .
The man certainly held some unusual views on a number of topics .
But… Reggie Moore , Milwaukee Office of Violence Prevention director , told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he had “ intervened in a dispute between Trammel and a young man ” that he thought was “ related to a Trump sign that Trammell was carrying.
” Moore told the newspaper that Trammell was “ a Black elder who didn ’ t deserve to die the way that he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Moore for more information on the encounter and Trammell ’ s importance to the community .
It ’ s not clear whether that encounter had anything to do with Trammell ’ s death , though , because police aren ’ t saying anything about motive or suspects .
Heavy What if it does turn out that he was killed for supporting Trump ?
For one thing , that would just be one more elevation of violence against Trump supporters… violence that has been downplayed , normalized , and even CHEERED among many on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who have been openly cheering the injuries inflicted upon Rand Paul by his neighbor . )
It wouldn ’ t be the first time we ’ ve seen an attempt to take the life of a Republican .
The explicitly political attempt at assassinating Scalise was thwarted only by the heroic work of the police .
Somehow , we suspect this story won ’ t get the same media attention as some others .

Just a few hours after giving a video interview explaining his support for Trump, Sixty-year old Bernell Trammell was shot dead near the very spot it was filmed.
Police are looking for ‘unknown suspects’ in the murder, and it is not yet certain if the man was murdered over his outspoken support of Trump.
Kevan Penvose wrote on Facebook that Trammell “was a man with whom I hardly ever agreed about anything he wrote on his signs, but also, as a Rasta street preacher, he was one of the people that make my neighborhood so uniquely wonderful. Around 12:30 this afternoon I heard gunshots nearby as I was working at my dining room table. Soon after, I was reading reports on social media of a shooting around the block, at the location of this one-of-a-kind storefront that I’ve walked by a million times… Peace and light, Ras Bernell.” Armstrong Ramsone (the pen name of local artist and writer Adebisi Agoro) wrote on the site The God Degree that he recorded video interviews with Trammell just hours before his death. “Earlier today he had mentioned to me ‘you wouldn’t guess the amount of hate I received from Black people,’” he wrote. Agoro became curious about Trammell’s political beliefs after seeing him at a bus stop and decided to ask “about what I saw on Facebook and why he was holding the Trump sign?” Agoro recorded videos of an interview he conducted that day in which Trammell, clutching a pro Trump sign, explains his political beliefs. You can see those videos here. “I have encouraged Afro-Americans from all walks of life and culture here in Wisconsin and particularly here in Milwaukee to vote Donald Trump for this year. Trump 2020. I believe Trump is the sign of the times,” Trammell says in one of the videos, recorded outside his publishing business near the very spot where he would be shot a few hours later. He is standing in front of a “Wisconsin Vote Donald Trump” sign in that video. “No less than two hours after I left from filming Ras Bernell I had heard word from Facebook that the someone in the area that Ras Bernell stays in had been shot,” Ransome wrote on The God Degree. “To my surprise it was Ras Bernell. The moment I had read the news I was attempting to upload the above videos used in this post onto my laptop for use…He was murdered right outside of his shop where we were just speaking. His home. Seemingly these were his last words.” Heavy
Some who knew him are already speculating that this is what got him killed.
The man certainly held some unusual views on a number of topics. But…
Reggie Moore, Milwaukee Office of Violence Prevention director, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he had “intervened in a dispute between Trammel and a young man” that he thought was “related to a Trump sign that Trammell was carrying.” Moore told the newspaper that Trammell was “a Black elder who didn’t deserve to die the way that he did.” Heavy has reached out to Moore for more information on the encounter and Trammell’s importance to the community. It’s not clear whether that encounter had anything to do with Trammell’s death, though, because police aren’t saying anything about motive or suspects. Heavy
What if it does turn out that he was killed for supporting Trump?
For one thing, that would just be one more elevation of violence against Trump supporters… violence that has been downplayed, normalized, and even CHEERED among many on the Left (sitting Democrats are among those who have been openly cheering the injuries inflicted upon Rand Paul by his neighbor.)
It wouldn’t be the first time we’ve seen an attempt to take the life of a Republican. The explicitly political attempt at assassinating Scalise was thwarted only by the heroic work of the police.
Somehow, we suspect this story won’t get the same media attention as some others.


clashdaily--2020-07-25--Charlamagne Tha God Wishes Biden Should ‘Shut The Eff Up Forever’ After The Former VP Says Trump Is

Charlamagne Tha God Wishes Biden Should ‘Shut The Eff Up Forever’ After The Former VP Says Trump Is The First Racist POTUS

Remember the NYC radio icon that Biden made his ‘ you ain ’ t black ’ blunder with ?
He ’ s now telling Biden to ‘ shut the eff up forever ’ .
So much for the natural advantage Biden supposedly has with the Black vote .
Biden is doing his utmost to burn even friendly bridges .
For example , ‘ Charlamagne tha God ’ isn ’ t happy with Joe Biden… again .
No , this time it isn ’ t for his ‘ you ain ’ t black ’ line .
Trending : FDNY : White @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Off Of Color Guard… Sues For Racial Bias This time it was his criticism of Trump .
Don ’ t misunderstand .
He has bought in completely to the race narrative and probably hates Trump with the heat of a thousand suns , but the WAY Biden criticized him was out of line .
Biden made the mistake of claiming that Trump was the first racist to be elected as President .
Charlamagne had no problem with the ( unjustifiable ) claim that Trump was a bigot .
That wasn ’ t the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s use of the word ‘ first ’ .
“ No sitting president has ever done this… No Republican president has done this .
No Democratic president .
We ’ ve had racists and they ’ ve existed and they ’ ve tried to get elected president .
He ’ s the first one that has , ” Biden said .
However , Charlamagne declared the presumptive Democratic candidate Thursday ’ s “ Donkey of the Day ” for his comments .
“ I really wish Joe Biden would shut the eff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he ’ s starring in the movie ‘ A Quiet Place ’ because as soon as he opens his mouth and makes noise , he gets us all killed , OK ?
” the radio host said .
“ There ’ s already so many people who are reluctantly only voting for Joe Biden because he ’ s the only option and because Donald J. Trump is that trash.
” Charlamagne then cited polling that showed a wide enthusiasm gap between Biden and Trump , noting that it ’ s “ not good @ @ @ @ @ @ @ excitement among his voters , and suggested Biden ’ s latest remarks will further contribute to the “ lack of enthusiasm.
” “ Old white male leadership has failed America and there is nothing worse than an old white male [ who ] can ’ t recognize the faults and flaws of other old white males , ” Charlamagne told listeners .
“ Racism is the American way .
Donald Trump is not the first .
And sadly , he won ’ t be the last , right ?
He ’ s just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presidents in recent times.
” … ” How are we ever going to atone for America ’ s original sins if we don ’ t acknowledge them ?
” Charlamagne asked in reaction to Biden ’ s remarks .
“ How the hell can Donald Trump be the first racist president in a country where 12 presidents before him owned slaves ?
” — FoxNews It makes one wonder if the blind allegiance the Dems have taken for granted for so long in that demographic is finally showing some signs of breaking down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tragic ’ for the Democrats ?

Remember the NYC radio icon that Biden made his ‘you ain’t black’ blunder with? He’s now telling Biden to ‘shut the eff up forever’.
So much for the natural advantage Biden supposedly has with the Black vote. Biden is doing his utmost to burn even friendly bridges.
For example, ‘Charlamagne tha God’ isn’t happy with Joe Biden… again.
No, this time it isn’t for his ‘you ain’t black’ line.
This time it was his criticism of Trump.
Don’t misunderstand. He has bought in completely to the race narrative and probably hates Trump with the heat of a thousand suns, but the WAY Biden criticized him was out of line.
Biden made the mistake of claiming that Trump was the first racist to be elected as President.
Charlamagne had no problem with the (unjustifiable) claim that Trump was a bigot. That wasn’t the issue. The real problem was Biden’s use of the word ‘first’.
“No sitting president has ever done this… No Republican president has done this. No Democratic president. We’ve had racists and they’ve existed and they’ve tried to get elected president. He’s the first one that has,” Biden said. However, Charlamagne declared the presumptive Democratic candidate Thursday’s “Donkey of the Day” for his comments. “I really wish Joe Biden would shut the eff up forever and continue to act like he’s starring in the movie ‘A Quiet Place’ because as soon as he opens his mouth and makes noise, he gets us all killed, OK?” the radio host said. “There’s already so many people who are reluctantly only voting for Joe Biden because he’s the only option and because Donald J. Trump is that trash.” Charlamagne then cited polling that showed a wide enthusiasm gap between Biden and Trump, noting that it’s “not good” for the Democrat to be lacking excitement among his voters, and suggested Biden’s latest remarks will further contribute to the “lack of enthusiasm.” “Old white male leadership has failed America and there is nothing worse than an old white male [who] can’t recognize the faults and flaws of other old white males,” Charlamagne told listeners. “Racism is the American way. Donald Trump is not the first. And sadly, he won’t be the last, right? He’s just more overt with his racism than most presidents in recent times.” …”How are we ever going to atone for America’s original sins if we don’t acknowledge them?” Charlamagne asked in reaction to Biden’s remarks. “How the hell can Donald Trump be the first racist president in a country where 12 presidents before him owned slaves?” — FoxNews
It makes one wonder if the blind allegiance the Dems have taken for granted for so long in that demographic is finally showing some signs of breaking down.
Wouldn’t that be ‘tragic’ for the Democrats?