clashdaily--2020-09-22--SHOCKER: Romney Commits To Considering Trump’s SCOTUS Nominee (VIDEO)

Mittens isn ’ t committing to voting against Trump ’ s nominee–I guess he realized that he ’ d never be able to show his face in Utah ever again if he didn ’ t agree to at least consider the candidate .
Or maybe , this was just Cocaine Mitch reminding Mitt that a SCOTUS nominee isn ’ t something that you play around with when the left has clearly lost their collective mind .
Tilting the balance of the Supreme Court to be more Originalist in view of the law is a win for all Republicans–even the squishes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Whatever it was , something caused Mittens to wake up and decide to consider the nominee instead of just his kneejerk anti-Trumpism .
Trending : LMAO : The Hodge Twins Take AOC To School For Whining About RBG ’ s ‘ Dying Wish ’ He hasn ’ t committed to voting for the nominee , but at least he ’ s not committed to voting against whoever she is as Democrats have been calling for GOP squishes to do .
He issued a statement outlining his thoughts on the Supreme Court vacancy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ line of reasoning .
That is probably the first time that that sentence has ever been written .
He wrote , “ My decision a Supreme Court nomination is not the result of a subjective test of ‘ fairness ’ which , like beauty , is in the eye of the beholder .
It is based on the immutable fairness of following the law which in this case is the Constitution and precedent .
The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of its own .
The Constitution gives the President the power to nominate and the Senat the authority to provide advice and consent on Supreme Court nominees .
Accordingly , I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the President ’ s nominee .
If the nominee reaches the Senate floor .
I intend to vote based upon their qualifications.
” It looks like Mitt Romney isn ’ t going to sabotage President Trump ’ s agenda at every opportunity–just most opportunities .
It ’ s a bit of a surprise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because he ’ s still bitter .
Aw , maybe we should be nice to Mittens .
Give him a cake or something .
If he likes it , we might even get him campaigning for Trump…what do you think ?
Right .
Probably not .
But we might just get a SCOTUS pick if he does vote for the nominee .
Let ’ s reserve judgment until he casts his vote .

Mittens isn’t committing to voting against Trump’s nominee–I guess he realized that he’d never be able to show his face in Utah ever again if he didn’t agree to at least consider the candidate.
Or maybe, this was just Cocaine Mitch reminding Mitt that a SCOTUS nominee isn’t something that you play around with when the left has clearly lost their collective mind.
Tilting the balance of the Supreme Court to be more Originalist in view of the law is a win for all Republicans–even the squishes like Senator Mitt Romney(R-UT).
Whatever it was, something caused Mittens to wake up and decide to consider the nominee instead of just his kneejerk anti-Trumpism.
He hasn’t committed to voting for the nominee, but at least he’s not committed to voting against whoever she is as Democrats have been calling for GOP squishes to do.
He issued a statement outlining his thoughts on the Supreme Court vacancy.
Romney basically followed the Ted Cruz line of reasoning. That is probably the first time that that sentence has ever been written.
Romney cited precedent and Article II.
He wrote, “My decision a Supreme Court nomination is not the result of a subjective test of ‘fairness’ which, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It is based on the immutable fairness of following the law which in this case is the Constitution and precedent. The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own. The Constitution gives the President the power to nominate and the Senat the authority to provide advice and consent on Supreme Court nominees. Accordingly, I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the President’s nominee. If the nominee reaches the Senate floor. I intend to vote based upon their qualifications.”
My statement regarding the current Supreme Court vacancy: pic.twitter.com/6YO0dPWWXc — Senator Mitt Romney (@SenatorRomney) September 22, 2020
BREAKING: GOP Sen. Mitt Romney announces that he will support a vote on President Trump's expected Supreme Court nominee this year, saying, "at this stage, it's appropriate to look at the Constitution." https://t.co/gWbBdqaaE2 pic.twitter.com/6fqIavmNiS — ABC News (@ABC) September 22, 2020
Who knew?
It looks like Mitt Romney isn’t going to sabotage President Trump’s agenda at every opportunity–just most opportunities.
It’s a bit of a surprise after he voted to impeach President Trump because he’s still bitter.
Aw, maybe we should be nice to Mittens. Give him a cake or something.
If he likes it, we might even get him campaigning for Trump…what do you think?
Right. Probably not.
But we might just get a SCOTUS pick if he does vote for the nominee. Let’s reserve judgment until he casts his vote.


clashdaily--2020-09-22--WATCH: Ted Cruz Explains Judicial Appointment History In Words Even Schumer Could Understand

The Left , predictably , is up to their usual tricks of never letting a crisis go to waste .
In this instance , they are using the death of their judicial Icon to mobilize their political machine .
They have already begun to leverage her passing for political donations .
They are feigning outrage at the neglect of her ‘ dying wish ’ .
They are threatening reprisals — including impeachment — if Trump and the Republican Senate dare to do what was , in the words of none other than Chuck Schumer 4 years ago ‘ your job @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hodge Twins Take AOC To School For Whining About RBG ’ s ‘ Dying Wish ’ It will be important , in averting a potential constitutional crisis in an election where we already know that lawyers will be working overtime , that a SCOTUS decision not result in a tie vote .
There is a long history of appointments like this one… the Garland situation notwithstanding .
In fact , the Garland situation is NOT an unusual result for when the Senate and President are of opposite parties .
What ’ s on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so critical ?
It ’ s how we avoid a constitutional crisis .
Inevitably , someone will shout the battle cry of the truly impotent : ‘ But it ’ s not fair !
’ Is Trump naming a replacement now any less fair that this example : Of course not .
As tough as she was , RBG knew her health was declining .
She could have stepped down during the Obama years and been assured of a Left-friendly replacement .
She chose not to .
She rolled the dice in staying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to fail .
She may well have hoped to remain as a judge through the end of Trump ’ s first term in office , but that decision was not within her power to make .
Now , there are an even number of Justices with every indication suggesting that the courts will play an important role in how this election is decided .
A deadlocked court could be disastrous and lead to God alone knows what kind of escalation of the chaos we ’ ve already been seeing .
It isn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power of nominating and confirming a replacement to fill that seat… the historical smooth transition of power might depend upon it .
The full interview , if you would like the whole thing in its context can be seen here :

The Left, predictably, is up to their usual tricks of never letting a crisis go to waste. In this instance, they are using the death of their judicial Icon to mobilize their political machine.
They have already begun to leverage her passing for political donations. They are feigning outrage at the neglect of her ‘dying wish’. They are threatening reprisals — including impeachment — if Trump and the Republican Senate dare to do what was, in the words of none other than Chuck Schumer 4 years ago ‘your job’.
.@SenSchumer said it himself. There's no reason the Senate can't #FillTheSeat in an election year. https://t.co/O1ovhQo08t — House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) September 21, 2020
It will be important, in averting a potential constitutional crisis in an election where we already know that lawyers will be working overtime, that a SCOTUS decision not result in a tie vote.
There is a long history of appointments like this one… the Garland situation notwithstanding.
.@tedcruz: “29 times there has been a vacancy in a presidential election year. Now, presidents have made nominations all 29 times. That's what presidents do. If there's a vacancy, they make a nomination”https://t.co/LY7jt2sK0c pic.twitter.com/Iv02JxuMOU — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 20, 2020
In fact, the Garland situation is NOT an unusual result for when the Senate and President are of opposite parties.
What’s on the line? Why is this outcome so critical? It’s how we avoid a constitutional crisis.
“I don’t know … I believe we will,” Sen Ted Cruz tells @gstephanopoulos when asked if Senate GOP have a the votes to confirm a Trump SCOTUS nomination ahead of Nov. 3 election, adding it’s “important” to fill the seat if there’s a contested election. https://t.co/jn2LmoJp7Q pic.twitter.com/oJvETGQRX4 — ABC News (@ABC) September 20, 2020
Inevitably, someone will shout the battle cry of the truly impotent: ‘But it’s not fair!’
No?
Is Trump naming a replacement now any less fair that this example:
ICYMI @SenTedCruz defends President Trump's right to nominate a justice: pic.twitter.com/M42qRVkUBM — America First Policies (@AmericaFirstPol) September 20, 2020
Of course not.
As tough as she was, RBG knew her health was declining. She could have stepped down during the Obama years and been assured of a Left-friendly replacement. She chose not to.
She rolled the dice in staying on long past her health had begun to fail. She may well have hoped to remain as a judge through the end of Trump’s first term in office, but that decision was not within her power to make.
Now, there are an even number of Justices with every indication suggesting that the courts will play an important role in how this election is decided. A deadlocked court could be disastrous and lead to God alone knows what kind of escalation of the chaos we’ve already been seeing.
It isn’t just politically advantageous to exert the power of nominating and confirming a replacement to fill that seat… the historical smooth transition of power might depend upon it.
The full interview, if you would like the whole thing in its context can be seen here:


clashdaily--2020-09-23--GOP Files Resolution To Condemn Dem Agenda To Pack SCOTUS

It ’ s been no secret that the Democrats have been butthurt over losing the activist edge their partisan referees in Black Robes kept giving to their legislation .
Now that Trump has the opportunity to appoint his third nominee — one that will finally tip the courts in favor of Originalist rather than Activist paradigms by either 6-3 or 5-4 ( depending on how you count Roberts ) — Democrats have been keenly aware of the loss of that political edge .
And , because that was the one way they could change the nation without putting anything to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public will in a given issue , they have been looking for ways to regain it .
Democrats have been openly musing about ripping apart the existing way of doing things and replacing them with new alternatives that would favor their future endeavors to gain re-election .
One such example is doing away with the Electoral college .
Another is the addition of PR as a state , and possibly D.C.. ( To hell with the Constitutional rationales for NOT having the seat of Government within any state of the Union . )
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Take AOC To School For Whining About RBG ’ s ‘ Dying Wish ’ The other power grab they have been eyeing ( under the guise of ‘ reform ’ ) is exactly the tactic that even Democrats slapped FDR ’ s hands for suggesting .
They want to add seat to the Supreme Court so they can pack them with Democrat Judges .
Republicans are drawing a line in the sand .
GOP House members filed a resolution on Tuesday to condemn Democrats ’ plans to pack the Supreme Court if they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s next nominee on the Senate floor .
Rep. Jim Jordan ( R-Ohio ) joined Liz McDonald on Fox Business ’ s “ The Evening Edit ” to introduce the resolution to the public .
“ The Republicans control the Senate , we control the White House , the president is following the law submitting a nominee to the Senate , the Senate is going to move forward with that nomination just like the Constitution says , ” Jordan explained .
“ So the Democrats say , if you do that and we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to change the rules .
We ’ re going to add six new people to the court.
” “ The court has been at nine for 151 years , so this is ridiculous .
I think the American people understand that , ” he added .
According to Jordan , every Republican on the House Judiciary Committee signed onto the resolution and he believes that it will gain even more traction with GOP House members .
“ I think every single Republican in the House will probably sign on to this .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Judiciary Committee already has , ” Jordan explained .
“ This is that kind of document .
It helps create the debate , and make the argument , even bigger for the country to understand what the Democrats are trying to do.
” —Federalist For all the gratuitous appeals we are seeing Democrats make to her alleged ‘ dying wish ’ this seems a good time to remind them about their hero ’ s own public statements about packing SCOTUS .
“ Nine seems to be a good number .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time , ” Ginsburg told NPR in July 2019 about the Supreme Court .
“ I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court.
” “ If anything would make the court look partisan , ” Ginsburg added .
“ It would be that – one side saying , ‘ When we ’ re in power , we ’ re going to enlarge the number of judges , so we would have more people who would vote the way we want them to.
’ ” —Federalist

It’s been no secret that the Democrats have been butthurt over losing the activist edge their partisan referees in Black Robes kept giving to their legislation.
Now that Trump has the opportunity to appoint his third nominee — one that will finally tip the courts in favor of Originalist rather than Activist paradigms by either 6-3 or 5-4 (depending on how you count Roberts) — Democrats have been keenly aware of the loss of that political edge.
And, because that was the one way they could change the nation without putting anything to an actual vote that requires persuading the public will in a given issue, they have been looking for ways to regain it.
Democrats have been openly musing about ripping apart the existing way of doing things and replacing them with new alternatives that would favor their future endeavors to gain re-election. One such example is doing away with the Electoral college. Another is the addition of PR as a state, and possibly D.C.. (To hell with the Constitutional rationales for NOT having the seat of Government within any state of the Union.)
The other power grab they have been eyeing (under the guise of ‘reform’) is exactly the tactic that even Democrats slapped FDR’s hands for suggesting.
They want to add seat to the Supreme Court so they can pack them with Democrat Judges.
Republicans are drawing a line in the sand.
GOP House members filed a resolution on Tuesday to condemn Democrats’ plans to pack the Supreme Court if they can’t defeat President Trump’s next nominee on the Senate floor. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) joined Liz McDonald on Fox Business’s “The Evening Edit” to introduce the resolution to the public. “The Republicans control the Senate, we control the White House, the president is following the law submitting a nominee to the Senate, the Senate is going to move forward with that nomination just like the Constitution says,” Jordan explained. “So the Democrats say, if you do that and we win back power, we’re going to change the rules. We’re going to add six new people to the court.” “The court has been at nine for 151 years, so this is ridiculous. I think the American people understand that,” he added. According to Jordan, every Republican on the House Judiciary Committee signed onto the resolution and he believes that it will gain even more traction with GOP House members. “I think every single Republican in the House will probably sign on to this. As I said every single republican on the Judiciary Committee already has,” Jordan explained. “This is that kind of document. It helps create the debate, and make the argument, even bigger for the country to understand what the Democrats are trying to do.” —Federalist
For all the gratuitous appeals we are seeing Democrats make to her alleged ‘dying wish’ this seems a good time to remind them about their hero’s own public statements about packing SCOTUS.


clashdaily--2020-09-23--Biden ‘Created’ Breitbart By His Abuse Of A SCOTUS Nominee… Are Dems Now Red-Pilling A Whole Generat

Biden ‘Created’ Breitbart By His Abuse Of A SCOTUS Nominee… Are Dems Now Red-Pilling A Whole Generation?

Democrats and the TV talking heads want us to think that deep political divisions are somehow a ‘ new ’ development .
History tells us differently .
As pointed out in Graham ’ s letter , Democrats have been playing a game of bare-knuckle politics for a very long time .
More recently , they ’ ve upgraded to brass knuckles , and aren ’ t afraid to break the occasional chair over our heads .
Meanwhile , they expect us all to fight according to Marquess of Queensberry Rules .
Here is Justice Robert ’ s reaction to how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the others back in 1991… which , ironically , came after Ted Kennedy showboated invoking notions of segregated lunch counters in the denunciation of Robert Bork a few years earlier .
Trending : LMAO : The Hodge Twins Take AOC To School For Whining About RBG ’ s ‘ Dying Wish ’ The Supreme Court is not worth it .
No job is worth it .
I am not here for that .
I am here for my name , my family , my life , and my integrity .
I think something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any person , any person in this free country would be subjected to this .
This is not a closed room .
There was an FBI investigation .
This is not an opportunity to talk about difficult matters privately or in a closed environment .
This is a circus .
It ’ s a national disgrace .
And from my standpoint as a black American , as far as I ’ m concerned , it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves , to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ideas , and it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order , this is what will happen to you .
You will be lynched , destroyed , caricatured by a committee of the U.S. — U.S. Senate , rather than hung from a tree .
—CNSNews Unbeknownst to Joe Biden at the time , his own attacks on Justice Thomas were playing a role in the creation of an absolute force of nature that would go on to completely redefine how the political right stands up and speaks out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ high-tech lynching ’ of Justice Clarence Thomas was the event that Red-Pilled Andrew Breitbart .
Breitbart went on to radically change how the Right fought back against Democrat dirty tactics .
Boiled down to 24 seconds , the Right woke up , showed up to the fight , and THIS was unleashed upon astonished political left .
Suddenly , Democrats weren ’ t the only ones going for the political jugular .
We all saw what the Kavanaugh case did to our sleepy go-along-to-get-along Republican senators .
These rage-cases are already threatening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ favorite activist judges no longer hold the balance of power in SCOTUS .
We can expect the kind of enraged reactions behavioral psychologists normally equate with extinction bursts .
When the public looks at how the left and the right react to this situation , respectively , that — together with everything we know about the riots — will go a long way toward showing the nation which parties stand for what issues .
And Dick Morris thinks that ’ s exactly what ’ s going to happen .
Especially if Trump appoints @ @

Democrats and the TV talking heads want us to think that deep political divisions are somehow a ‘new’ development. History tells us differently.
As pointed out in Graham’s letter, Democrats have been playing a game of bare-knuckle politics for a very long time. More recently, they’ve upgraded to brass knuckles, and aren’t afraid to break the occasional chair over our heads. Meanwhile, they expect us all to fight according to Marquess of Queensberry Rules.
Lastly, after the treatment of Justice Kavanaugh, I now have a different view of the judicial-confirmation process. Compare the treatment of Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh to that of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, and it’s clear that there already is one set of rules for a Republican president and one set of rules for a Democrat president. –ClashDaily
Here is Justice Robert’s reaction to how he was treated by Joe Biden and the others back in 1991… which, ironically, came after Ted Kennedy showboated invoking notions of segregated lunch counters in the denunciation of Robert Bork a few years earlier.
The Supreme Court is not worth it. No job is worth it. I am not here for that. I am here for my name, my family, my life, and my integrity. I think something is dreadfully wrong with this country when any person, any person in this free country would be subjected to this. This is not a closed room. There was an FBI investigation. This is not an opportunity to talk about difficult matters privately or in a closed environment. This is a circus. It’s a national disgrace. And from my standpoint as a black American, as far as I’m concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas, and it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. You will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U.S. — U.S. Senate, rather than hung from a tree. —CNSNews
Unbeknownst to Joe Biden at the time, his own attacks on Justice Thomas were playing a role in the creation of an absolute force of nature that would go on to completely redefine how the political right stands up and speaks out against the traditional media gatekeepers.
The ‘high-tech lynching’ of Justice Clarence Thomas was the event that Red-Pilled Andrew Breitbart.
Breitbart went on to radically change how the Right fought back against Democrat dirty tactics.
Boiled down to 24 seconds, the Right woke up, showed up to the fight, and THIS was unleashed upon astonished political left.
Suddenly, Democrats weren’t the only ones going for the political jugular.
We all saw what the Kavanaugh case did to our sleepy go-along-to-get-along Republican senators.
Democrats will do everything in their power to destroy whoever Trump picks for SCOTUS. Never forget what they did to Brett Kavanaugh as they do that. pic.twitter.com/awBG8PtevH — Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) September 21, 2020
These rage-cases are already threatening to rip up the nation if their favorite activist judges no longer hold the balance of power in SCOTUS.
We can expect the kind of enraged reactions behavioral psychologists normally equate with extinction bursts.
When the public looks at how the left and the right react to this situation, respectively, that — together with everything we know about the riots — will go a long way toward showing the nation which parties stand for what issues.
And Dick Morris thinks that’s exactly what’s going to happen. Especially if Trump appoints Lagoa.


clashdaily--2020-09-23--Executive Order: Trump Deals Another Blow To Activists Pushing Marxist Race Theories

When Obama whipped out his pen and his phone , it was often to bypass the lawful restraints on Article II powers and ‘ fundamentally transform ’ the country .
Trump is using his pen and his phone in a very different way .
Unlike his predecessor , Trump is using that power to preserve what has made America the favorite destination of people from all over the world .
He came out against Critical Race Theory being offered within any Federal agency falling within the scope of the Executive Branch .
And now , turning typical Leftist tactics on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on that good start .
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday which prohibits government contractors from providing employees with training that promotes stereotyping because of race or sex .
Trump ’ s order calls for the banning of training centered on the concept that some individuals are superior because of their race or sex .
Federal grant money will no longer be used to fund such training .
…According to the executive order , training that “ promotes race or sex stereotyping or scapegoating ” are factors in contributing to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any indication that white people are biased against minorities simply by virtue of their race .
—Newsweek Instead of demanding that anyone who does any business with the federal government bend over backward for whatever the latest fashionable leftist fad is , Trump has turned that tactic around by 180 degrees .
The difference between where both candidates plan on taking us into the future couldn ’ t be any more stark than it is right now .

When Obama whipped out his pen and his phone, it was often to bypass the lawful restraints on Article II powers and ‘fundamentally transform’ the country. Trump is using his pen and his phone in a very different way.
Unlike his predecessor, Trump is using that power to preserve what has made America the favorite destination of people from all over the world.
He came out against Critical Race Theory being offered within any Federal agency falling within the scope of the Executive Branch.
And now, turning typical Leftist tactics on their head, he has built further on that good start.
…with our Country, the United States Military, Government Contractors, and Grantees. Americans should be taught to take PRIDE in our Great Country, and if you don’t, there’s nothing in it for you! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 22, 2020
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday which prohibits government contractors from providing employees with training that promotes stereotyping because of race or sex. Trump’s order calls for the banning of training centered on the concept that some individuals are superior because of their race or sex. Federal grant money will no longer be used to fund such training. …According to the executive order, training that “promotes race or sex stereotyping or scapegoating” are factors in contributing to divisiveness in the workplace. This includes any indication that white people are biased against minorities simply by virtue of their race. —Newsweek
Instead of demanding that anyone who does any business with the federal government bend over backward for whatever the latest fashionable leftist fad is, Trump has turned that tactic around by 180 degrees.
The difference between where both candidates plan on taking us into the future couldn’t be any more stark than it is right now.


clashdaily--2020-09-23--Whoops: Cop-Defunder Activist Alyssa Milano Calls For Police Protection Over ‘Gun Scare’

She doesn ’ t care if the rough parts of town are short on police protection… so long as someone comes running when she needs help .
How typical of the Hollywood elitists .
Alyssa Milano took a break from backing the ‘ defund the police ’ cause long enough to call for a massive police response to the threat of a gunman .
Milano , though , who recently tweeted to “ Defund the Police ” and asked her social media followers to sign on to a petition that “ demands a 90 percent reduction in police funding ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ triggered what neighbors told the Mail was a “ massive ” police presence after calling 911 to report gunshots on Sunday .
Trending : LMAO : The Hodge Twins Take AOC To School For Whining About RBG ’ s ‘ Dying Wish ’ “ Alyssa and her talent agent husband … had dialed 911 when they heard what they believed to be gunshots on their 1.39-acre property , ” the Daily Mail reported ( Milano now challenges that version of events ) .
“ They allegedly told the emergency hotline the sound ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feel like the gunman was nearby .
A description was given of a suspect to the officers who was ‘ male , 40-years old , with long rifle.
’ ” The couple was reportedly concerned that the alleged gunman could be a stalker ; Milano has filed restraining orders against an older man who has broken into her home twice .
The call triggered “ a response that included seven Ventura County Sheriffs ’ vehicles , one K-9 unit , a police helicopter , and one Los Angeles Fire Department team that sat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Milano has issued a statement claiming a neighbor alerted them to a man “ dressed in black ” holding a rifle .
It is not clear , based on her statement , who called the police though her neighbors claim to the Daily Mail that she was the one who alerted authorities .
Milano says that is “ a lie , ” and thanked the Ventura police department for responding to the call regardless .
—DailyWire So long as the negative impact of the policies she demands have any effect on her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them .

She doesn’t care if the rough parts of town are short on police protection… so long as someone comes running when she needs help.
How typical of the Hollywood elitists.
Alyssa Milano took a break from backing the ‘defund the police’ cause long enough to call for a massive police response to the threat of a gunman.
Milano, though, who recently tweeted to “Defund the Police” and asked her social media followers to sign on to a petition that “demands a 90 percent reduction in police funding” in the Los Angeles city budget, triggered what neighbors told the Mail was a “massive” police presence after calling 911 to report gunshots on Sunday. “Alyssa and her talent agent husband … had dialed 911 when they heard what they believed to be gunshots on their 1.39-acre property,” the Daily Mail reported (Milano now challenges that version of events). “They allegedly told the emergency hotline the sound ‘scared their dogs’ and made them feel like the gunman was nearby. A description was given of a suspect to the officers who was ‘male, 40-years old, with long rifle.’” The couple was reportedly concerned that the alleged gunman could be a stalker; Milano has filed restraining orders against an older man who has broken into her home twice. The call triggered “a response that included seven Ventura County Sheriffs’ vehicles, one K-9 unit, a police helicopter, and one Los Angeles Fire Department team that sat down the street on standby.” …UPDATE: Milano has issued a statement claiming a neighbor alerted them to a man “dressed in black” holding a rifle. It is not clear, based on her statement, who called the police though her neighbors claim to the Daily Mail that she was the one who alerted authorities. Milano says that is “a lie,” and thanked the Ventura police department for responding to the call regardless. —DailyWire
So long as the negative impact of the policies she demands have any effect on her, she’s happy to push them.


clashdaily--2020-09-23--DICK MORRIS: Here’s Why Trump Would Be Smart To Nominate Lagoa

Dick Morris has had some success at reading the political tea leaves .
For one thing , he predicted a Trump surge in 2016 when others didn ’ t .
He ’ s making the case for Trump picking Lagoa despite the popularity of ACB .
He sees a win-win scenario where Lagoa will not only be a pick that makes his base happy but one that will force the hand of the Left to rip off their masks and show exactly how vicious and cruel they really are .
The Left ’ s base will have no choice but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nominates .
Morris is saying that instinct can be made to boomerang against them .
Why ?
Trending : LMAO : The Hodge Twins Take AOC To School For Whining About RBG ’ s ‘ Dying Wish ’ The pro side for both her and ACB comes out as a wash .
The base will be happy with either candidate .
But if we put Lagoa into the same slot , the Democrats could step on exactly the same landmine that Joe Biden did back in the days when they tried to ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Thomas ’ s objection to Biden ’ s haranguing , don ’ t you ?
He took Biden behind the gym and gave him a rhetorical beating , exposing him to all the world for what he really was .
The Supreme Court is not worth it .
No job is worth it .
I am not here for that .
I am here for my name , my family , my life , and my integrity .
I think something is dreadfully wrong with this country when any person , any person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to this .
This is not a closed room .
There was an FBI investigation .
This is not an opportunity to talk about difficult matters privately or in a closed environment .
This is a circus .
It ’ s a national disgrace .
And from my standpoint as a black American , as far as I ’ m concerned , it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves , to do for themselves , to have different ideas , and it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an old order , this is what will happen to you .
You will be lynched , destroyed , caricatured by a committee of the U.S. — U.S. Senate , rather than hung from a tree .
—CNSNews If the left ever unleashes their undiluted hatred on Lagoa , a Hispanic Catholic woman , this could come as a wake-up call to some of the same special interest groups Democrats are so anxious to leverage .
Laying a beat-down on Lagoa because she holds to Catholic beliefs isn ’ t just forbidden by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Democrats look really bad , tawdry , and small .
Having seen how they have already gone down this road before , they almost can ’ t help themselves .
SICK : Bernie Sanders Puts His Bigotry On FULL Display During Trump ’ s Nominee Hearings

Dick Morris has had some success at reading the political tea leaves. For one thing, he predicted a Trump surge in 2016 when others didn’t. He’s making the case for Trump picking Lagoa despite the popularity of ACB.
He sees a win-win scenario where Lagoa will not only be a pick that makes his base happy but one that will force the hand of the Left to rip off their masks and show exactly how vicious and cruel they really are.
The Left’s base will have no choice but to go all-in on attacking whoever Trump nominates.
Morris is saying that instinct can be made to boomerang against them. Why?
He explains…
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=708758516380260&extid=7GaBMkw6nyUD8EaO
The pro side for both her and ACB comes out as a wash. The base will be happy with either candidate.
But if we put Lagoa into the same slot, the Democrats could step on exactly the same landmine that Joe Biden did back in the days when they tried to ‘Bork’ Clarence Thomas.
You remember Thomas’s objection to Biden’s haranguing, don’t you?
He took Biden behind the gym and gave him a rhetorical beating, exposing him to all the world for what he really was.
The Supreme Court is not worth it. No job is worth it. I am not here for that. I am here for my name, my family, my life, and my integrity. I think something is dreadfully wrong with this country when any person, any person in this free country would be subjected to this. This is not a closed room. There was an FBI investigation. This is not an opportunity to talk about difficult matters privately or in a closed environment. This is a circus. It’s a national disgrace. And from my standpoint as a black American, as far as I’m concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas, and it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. You will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U.S. — U.S. Senate, rather than hung from a tree. —CNSNews
If the left ever unleashes their undiluted hatred on Lagoa, a Hispanic Catholic woman, this could come as a wake-up call to some of the same special interest groups Democrats are so anxious to leverage.
Laying a beat-down on Lagoa because she holds to Catholic beliefs isn’t just forbidden by the Constitution, it would also make the Democrats look really bad, tawdry, and small.
Having seen how they have already gone down this road before, they almost can’t help themselves.
Related…
Secular Inquisition: Radical Left Declares Open Season On Religious Freedom
SICK: Bernie Sanders Puts His Bigotry On FULL Display During Trump’s Nominee Hearings


clashdaily--2020-09-24--Activists Will NOT Be Satisfied By Charges In Breonna Taylor’s Death — Here’s The 411

Shot dead during a police raid in her own home , Breonna Taylor ’ s name has been elevated to the pantheon of names that others are called upon to ‘ say ’ during BLM marches .
She has been held up as an example of police wrongly and recklessly ending the lives of black civilians .
The only problem with that accusation is that it presumed the guilt of the officers involved .
It got ahead of the investigation and hung an albatross of guilt around the necks of officers involved .
It also created a public expectation of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ finding of guilt .
But in our system , guilt is not presumed .
Innocence is .
Guilt must be proven .
And we ’ re nowhere near that stage of the game yet .
But what we DO know at this point is which charges the Grand Jury has decided were warranted in this case , and which were not .
The crowds , having long since whet their appetites for murder charges against all three , will not be happy with their findings .
Here ’ s what we know : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ investigation into all aspects of the Breonna Taylor case and will be weighing whether any Federal charges beyond what the Grand Jury came back with .
– None of the 3 Kentucky officers involved in the incident have been charged with murder relating to the death of Breonna Taylor .
– One of the officers faces charges of a much lesser offence , ‘ wanton endangerment ’ .
This charge relates to him having fired his weapon into neighboring apartments during the incident .
– Two of the officers were authorized to use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact that the boyfriend fired the first shot .
There was a detail we had never been told before , one that amounted to a major plot twist even more critical to the facts of the case than the fact that her boyfriend fired first .
Despite the fact that the warrant given them was , strictly speaking , a no-knock warrant , the officers in question DID knock and they did announce themselves as being police .
The details here change everything we thought we knew .
But don ’ t expect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Shot dead during a police raid in her own home, Breonna Taylor’s name has been elevated to the pantheon of names that others are called upon to ‘say’ during BLM marches.
‘Say her name’.
She has been held up as an example of police wrongly and recklessly ending the lives of black civilians.
The only problem with that accusation is that it presumed the guilt of the officers involved. It got ahead of the investigation and hung an albatross of guilt around the necks of officers involved.
It also created a public expectation of the legal system arriving at a particular finding of guilt. But in our system, guilt is not presumed. Innocence is.
Guilt must be proven. And we’re nowhere near that stage of the game yet.
But what we DO know at this point is which charges the Grand Jury has decided were warranted in this case, and which were not.
The crowds, having long since whet their appetites for murder charges against all three, will not be happy with their findings.
Here’s what we know:
– The FBI has wrapped up an investigation into all aspects of the Breonna Taylor case and will be weighing whether any Federal charges beyond what the Grand Jury came back with.
– None of the 3 Kentucky officers involved in the incident have been charged with murder relating to the death of Breonna Taylor.
– One of the officers faces charges of a much lesser offence, ‘wanton endangerment’. This charge relates to him having fired his weapon into neighboring apartments during the incident.
– Two of the officers were authorized to use force in the incident owing to the fact that the boyfriend fired the first shot.
There was a detail we had never been told before, one that amounted to a major plot twist even more critical to the facts of the case than the fact that her boyfriend fired first.
Despite the fact that the warrant given them was, strictly speaking, a no-knock warrant, the officers in question DID knock and they did announce themselves as being police.
A witness corroborated that claim.
The details here change everything we thought we knew.
But don’t expect it to change the minds of anyone.


clashdaily--2020-09-23--David, The Giant Slayer Painting, Needs To Be In Every Kid’s Bedroom

“ The principles of true art is not to portray , but to evoke.
” – Jerzy Kosinski If you surround yourself with excellence and inspiration , it ’ s that much harder to live a mediocre life .
Art built around such excellence can not help but spark your imagination and whets your appetite for ‘ something more ’ .
It stands as a silent challenge to step up .
How much more so when the excellence and inspiration you ’ re pointing to are the titans ( and giant-slayers ! )
of Scripture ?
Long before King David @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was already leaning into his destiny .
He trusted God and took action .
Having already tested his skills against a lion and a bear , he knew he had what it took to stand against Goliath .
In a generation that works so hard to tell us that men of courage and strength belong in a bygone era , that mediocrity should be celebrated , and that everyone should get a participation prize … push back .
Provide yourself , your kids , or grandkids a daily reminder that there is still @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this world .
That milquetoast mediocrity is not the only path in front of them .
That , no matter how obscure their origin stories , they , like David , can step up and be something beyond what anyone ever expected of them .
Get your own copy here , in a variety of sizes and styles , starting from about $ 34 .

“The principles of true art is not to portray, but to evoke.” – Jerzy Kosinski
If you surround yourself with excellence and inspiration, it’s that much harder to live a mediocre life.
Art built around such excellence cannot help but spark your imagination and whets your appetite for ‘something more’. It stands as a silent challenge to step up.
How much more so when the excellence and inspiration you’re pointing to are the titans (and giant-slayers!) of Scripture?
Long before King David sat on his royal throne, he was already leaning into his destiny.
He trusted God and took action.
Having already tested his skills against a lion and a bear, he knew he had what it took to stand against Goliath.
In a generation that works so hard to tell us that men of courage and strength belong in a bygone era, that mediocrity should be celebrated, and that everyone should get a participation prize … push back.
Provide yourself, your kids, or grandkids a daily reminder that there is still room for heroes to be celebrated in this world.
That milquetoast mediocrity is not the only path in front of them.
That, no matter how obscure their origin stories, they, like David, can step up and be something beyond what anyone ever expected of them.
Get your own copy here, in a variety of sizes and styles, starting from about $34.


clashdaily--2020-09-23--LMAO: The McCloskeys Have A UNIQUE Way To Shut Down The BLM Harassers After Viral Video Defending Th

LMAO: The McCloskeys Have A UNIQUE Way To Shut Down The BLM Harassers After Viral Video Defending Their Home

Since they became famous as the “ St .
Louis gun couple ” for protecting their home from BLM “ mostly peaceful protesters ” in June , the McCloskeys have been targeted and harassed .
They have a very interesting way of dealing with it .
Who could forget Mark and Patricia McCloskeys , the couple that stood in front of their palatial St. Louis home armed as a crowed of BLM supporters broke into their gated community ?
They were bashed in the press and then were charged for making it clear to a roving mob that they weren @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was harassing and shouting at them as they were leaving a store to head to their Cadillac SUV got a surprise gift from Mark McCloskey .
This classless woman who shouted “ abolish the suburbs ” and “ you ’ re terrorists ” with a sprinkling of “ F*ck you !
” for good measure was handed a little memento of her encounter .
The McCloskeys have had cards printed with their photos and that ’ s what they appear to have been picking up when confronted by the angry woman .
A-plus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tweeted that he and Patricia had been confronted at a print shop just two days before the above Twitter thread was posted .
It seems that this type of harassment isn ’ t unusual for the McCloskeys .
Here are the McCloskeys speaking at the Republican National Convention in August : They ’ re not wrong about the leftist activists that want to take over .
They ’ re also not wrong about the media wanting to destroy people who stand up for conservative values .

Since they became famous as the “St. Louis gun couple” for protecting their home from BLM “mostly peaceful protesters” in June, the McCloskeys have been targeted and harassed. They have a very interesting way of dealing with it.
Who could forget Mark and Patricia McCloskeys, the couple that stood in front of their palatial St. Louis home armed as a crowed of BLM supporters broke into their gated community?
WATCH: A White couple pointed guns at protesters in St. Louis as a group marched toward the mayor's home to demand her resignation. Video shows the armed couple standing outside their home Sunday evening in the upscale Central West End neighborhood of the Missouri city. pic.twitter.com/VTuQjzcJyA — CBS This Morning (@CBSThisMorning) June 29, 2020
They were bashed in the press and then were charged for making it clear to a roving mob that they weren’t going to
A woman who was harassing and shouting at them as they were leaving a store to head to their Cadillac SUV got a surprise gift from Mark McCloskey.
This classless woman who shouted “abolish the suburbs” and “you’re terrorists” with a sprinkling of “F*ck you!” for good measure was handed a little memento of her encounter.
The McCloskeys have had cards printed with their photos and that’s what they appear to have been picking up when confronted by the angry woman.
They got 1,000 of these printed and have even been signing them pic.twitter.com/LPAhR8IRAl — Defund 2 Abolish (@314khalea) September 21, 2020
A-plus on the creativity there!
I love these guys!
Mark McCloskey tweeted that he and Patricia had been confronted at a print shop just two days before the above Twitter thread was posted.
Just got confronted at a local printshop. This young lady started using the "f" word and saying "abolish the suburbs", then a Diminos guy comes up and gives us two middle fingers. Unfortunately I didn't get the phone out in time, but she came back to give us an encore. pic.twitter.com/rzC8DjiLO6 — Mark T. McCloskey (@Mark__McCloskey) September 19, 2020
It seems that this type of harassment isn’t unusual for the McCloskeys.
Here are the McCloskeys speaking at the Republican National Convention in August:
"It seems as if Democrats no longer view the government's job as protecting honest citizens from criminals — but rather protecting criminals from honest citizens." Watch Mark and Patty McCloskey's speech in full at the #RNC https://t.co/t4JLeDoDYV pic.twitter.com/AvEhh9KhKk — Bloomberg (@business) August 25, 2020
They’re not wrong about the leftist activists that want to take over.
They’re also not wrong about the media wanting to destroy people who stand up for conservative values.
God bless ’em!
Stay rowdy, McCloskeys!


clashdaily--2020-09-23--Mini Mike Bloomberg Dumping Millions Into Freeing Florida Felons So They Can Vote — But Is That Lega

Mini Mike Bloomberg Dumping Millions Into Freeing Florida Felons So They Can Vote — But Is That Legal?

Dear Media ( D ) –is this considered “ quid pro quo ” or not ?
It ’ s hilarious that the Democratic Party that is allegedly against the “ big money ” in politics is just fine when it ’ s their guy tossing money hand-over-fist in every attempt to get their candidate elected .
Mike Bloomberg , billionaire and failed Democratic candidate , had pledged to financially back whoever the nominee for his party was going to be , but he hadn ’ t made good on that promise until a couple of weeks ago .
But now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ name to raise money and dump millions to pay off the debts of felons in Florida so that they can vote in the 2020 election .
According to The Daily Mail , Bloomberg issued a statement saying , “ We know to win Florida we will need to persuade , motivate and add new votes to the Biden column .
This means we need to explore all avenues for finding the needed votes when so many votes are already determined.
” Some of those “ new votes ” are from convicted felons that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of their fines have been paid .
Billionaire Michael Bloomberg has reportedly raised more than $ 16 million in an effort to help convicted felons in Florida register to vote .
The Florida Rights Restoration Coalition estimated Bloomberg ’ s fundraising push has already paid off monetary obligations for 32,000 felons , Axios reported .
“ The right to vote is fundamental to our democracy and no American should be denied that right , ” a Bloomberg spokesperson told the news outlet .
“ Working together with the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the discrimination that has always driven it.
” A spokesperson for Biden was pretty clear when speaking to the Washington Post about the reasoning behind this , “ Mike wanted to get this done for two reasons .
One , because it ’ s the right thing to do for the democracy .
And two , because it immediately activates tens of thousands of voters who are predisposed to vote for Joe Biden.
” Why are they “ predisposed ” to vote Democrat ?
Because of their race .
NBC News reports , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Latino felons in Florida who registered to vote while the law was in question — populations that have historically backed Democrats in larger numbers.
” ( Emphasis added ) But Democrats don ’ t see people as voting blocs .
This comes just days after Florida Governor Ron DeSantis ( R-FL ) , won a court victory which stated that convicted felons could only register to vote after all of their fines had been paid .
The win was over a 2018 Amendment to Florida ’ s Constitution that would permit voting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , except those convicted of murder or felony sexual offenses , once they have “ completed all of the terms of their sentences.
” The DeSantis administration has said that this includes the payment of all fines .
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with DeSantis .
The question is , does paying off millions in fines for felons who can ’ t afford to do it themselves so that they can vote , constitute election interference ?
Rep. Matt Gaetz ( R-FL ) thinks that it does .
He says that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Here ’ s Rep. Gaetz speaking to Lou Dobbs about this issue : Later , Rep. Gaetz was on Hannity ’ s show and said that the Florida Attorney General is “ all over ” Bloomberg ’ s actions in Florida .
Rep. Gaetz says that it ’ s normally very difficult to prove a vote-buying scheme , but the statements made by Bloomberg could be seen as an admission .
The fiery Congressman said , “ Florida statute says that it ’ s a third-degree felony for someone to either directly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impact whether or not someone votes .
So the question is whether or not paying off someone ’ s fines and legal obligations counts as something of value , and it clearly does.
” He continued , “ If Michael Bloomberg was offering to pay off people ’ s credit card debt , you would obviously see the value in that .
So , when you improve someone ’ s net worth by eliminating their financial liabilities , that ’ s something of value.
” That could be some bad news for Mini-Mike @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dumping cash into the fund , The Daily Mail notes that other donors include , “ John Legend , LeBron James , Michael Jordan , MTV , Comedy Central , VH1 , Ben & Jerry ’ s , Levi Strauss & Co , the Miami Dolphins , the Orlando Magic , the Miami Heat and Stephen Spielberg.
” Outkick the Coverage obtained a screenshot of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition texting an individual seeking felons that need their fines paid .
This particular issue is making quite the splash on social media .
@ @ @ @ @ @

Dear Media (D)–is this considered “quid pro quo” or not?
It’s hilarious that the Democratic Party that is allegedly against the “big money” in politics is just fine when it’s their guy tossing money hand-over-fist in every attempt to get their candidate elected.
Mike Bloomberg, billionaire and failed Democratic candidate, had pledged to financially back whoever the nominee for his party was going to be, but he hadn’t made good on that promise until a couple of weeks ago.
ClashDaily covered that here:
Mini-Mike Commits $100 MILLION To Help Hidin’ Biden Win Florida
But now it seems that Mini-Mike is using his name to raise money and dump millions to pay off the debts of felons in Florida so that they can vote in the 2020 election.
According to The Daily Mail, Bloomberg issued a statement saying, “We know to win Florida we will need to persuade, motivate and add new votes to the Biden column. This means we need to explore all avenues for finding the needed votes when so many votes are already determined.”
Some of those “new votes” are from convicted felons that will be eligible to vote if all of their fines have been paid.
Billionaire Michael Bloomberg has reportedly raised more than $16 million in an effort to help convicted felons in Florida register to vote. The Florida Rights Restoration Coalition estimated Bloomberg’s fundraising push has already paid off monetary obligations for 32,000 felons, Axios reported. “The right to vote is fundamental to our democracy and no American should be denied that right,” a Bloomberg spokesperson told the news outlet. “Working together with the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, we are determined to end disenfranchisement and the discrimination that has always driven it.” Source: The Hill
A spokesperson for Biden was pretty clear when speaking to the Washington Post about the reasoning behind this, “Mike wanted to get this done for two reasons. One, because it’s the right thing to do for the democracy. And two, because it immediately activates tens of thousands of voters who are predisposed to vote for Joe Biden.”
Why are they “predisposed” to vote Democrat? Because of their race.
NBC News reports, “The voting effort targets mostly Black and Latino felons in Florida who registered to vote while the law was in question — populations that have historically backed Democrats in larger numbers.” (Emphasis added)
But Democrats don’t see people as voting blocs.
This comes just days after Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R-FL), won a court victory which stated that convicted felons could only register to vote after all of their fines had been paid. The win was over a 2018 Amendment to Florida’s Constitution that would permit voting rights to be restored to convicted felons, except those convicted of murder or felony sexual offenses, once they have “completed all of the terms of their sentences.” The DeSantis administration has said that this includes the payment of all fines. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with DeSantis.
The question is, does paying off millions in fines for felons who can’t afford to do it themselves so that they can vote, constitute election interference?
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) thinks that it does. He says that it amounts to “bribery and vote-buying.”
Here’s Rep. Gaetz speaking to Lou Dobbs about this issue:
Florida Fraud: @RepMattGaetz announces he is calling on the Florida Attorney General to open an investigation into Michael Bloomberg for potentially engaging in bribery and vote buying after he paid the fines for convicted felons in Florida. #AmericaFirst #MAGA #Dobbs pic.twitter.com/9uglijOXMm — Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs) September 22, 2020
Later, Rep. Gaetz was on Hannity’s show and said that the Florida Attorney General is “all over” Bloomberg’s actions in Florida.
I just spoke to @AGAshleyMoody, she is all over the @MikeBloomberg-connected activities in Florida. There may even be a criminal investigation already underway. Law enforcement all over the country should be looking for the cheating Democrats are going to try in this election. pic.twitter.com/S5K5gl8lYt — Rep. Matt Gaetz (@RepMattGaetz) September 23, 2020
Rep. Gaetz says that it’s normally very difficult to prove a vote-buying scheme, but the statements made by Bloomberg could be seen as an admission.
The fiery Congressman said, “Florida statute says that it’s a third-degree felony for someone to either directly or indirectly provide something of value to impact whether or not someone votes. So the question is whether or not paying off someone’s fines and legal obligations counts as something of value, and it clearly does.”
He continued, “If Michael Bloomberg was offering to pay off people’s credit card debt, you would obviously see the value in that. So, when you improve someone’s net worth by eliminating their financial liabilities, that’s something of value.”
That could be some bad news for Mini-Mike!
Bloomberg isn’t alone in dumping cash into the fund, The Daily Mail notes that other donors include, “John Legend, LeBron James, Michael Jordan, MTV, Comedy Central, VH1, Ben & Jerry’s, Levi Strauss & Co, the Miami Dolphins, the Orlando Magic, the Miami Heat and Stephen Spielberg.”
Outkick the Coverage obtained a screenshot of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition texting an individual seeking felons that need their fines paid.
This particular issue is making quite the splash on social media.
Today's headlines of Bloomberg paying off the fines of 32,000 felons in Florida so they can vote STUNS me. If paying off one's debt so they can vote isn't a QUID PRO QUO TO VOTE FOR JOE, then I don't know what is. Will media highlight this abuse hindering a fair election? — Charles (@CharlesPHerring) September 23, 2020
Bloomberg, the new Soros, pays fines for 32,000 felons in #Florida so they can vote | TheHill https://t.co/ax81UIhDgC — Bernard B. Kerik (@BernardKerik) September 22, 2020
Mike Bloomberg paid the fines and fees of 32,000 convicted felons in Florida so they can vote. It's worth noting "whoever makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person" to vote or withhold his vote is a federal crime. — thebradfordfile™ (@thebradfordfile) September 23, 2020
Bloomberg is going to end up in cuffs for the paying off fines of felons in Florida thing and that… that gets me a little excited. — Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) September 23, 2020
Once upon time @TheDemocrats were more clever buying votes. https://t.co/jkCG2aaAaL — Janie Johnson – Champion Of Lemonade Stands (@jjauthor) September 23, 2020
This could get quite interesting.


clashdaily--2020-09-23--BOMBSHELL: Senate Report On Hunter Biden Corruption Is DEVASTATING–Ties To Ukraine, China, Moscow, A

BOMBSHELL: Senate Report On Hunter Biden Corruption Is DEVASTATING–Ties To Ukraine, China, Moscow, And Suspected Human Trafficking Ring

The new allegations against the former Vice President ’ s son , Hunter , are absolutely explosive !
For a guy who appeared to like to get paid for doing nothing , Hunter Biden sure was busy !
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs ( HSGAC ) and the Committee on Finance have released their report on Hunter Biden and it is an 87-page wild ride !
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley ( R-IA ) launched the investigation after he raised concerns over conflict-of-interest regarding the sale of a U.S. company to a Chinese firm that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Grassley had sounded the alarm in August 2019–approximately four months before a whistleblower complaint was made regarding President Trump ’ s phone call to the newly-elected Ukrainian President which prompted Democrats to move to impeach the President .
Here ’ s the TL ; DR version of the most interesting points : • Hunter Biden received a $ 3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina , the wife of the mayor of Moscow .
• Hunter Biden had business associations with Ye Jianming , Gongwen Dong , and other Chinese nationals linked to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Liberation Army .
Those associations resulted in millions of dollars in cash flow .
• Hunter Biden paid nonresident women who were nationals of Russia or other Eastern European countries and who appear to be linked to an “ Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring.
” • Joe was warned by American officials in Ukraine–former Acting Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv , Ukraine , George Kent and former U.S. Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs Amos Hochstein–that Hunter ’ s Burisma Board post was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pushing an anticorruption agenda in Ukraine , ” and “ enabled Russian disinformation efforts and risked undermining U.S. policy in Ukraine.
” Yikes !
Democrats have been accusing President Trump of some sort of “ bromance ” with Putin , but Joe Biden ’ s son received millions from the Mayor of Moscow ’ s wife .
We knew that Hunter was kinda skeezy in his personal relationships , but paying for prostitutes who were trafficked seems to be a whole new level of skeeze .
The financial connections to the Chinese military @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manufacturing jobs over there and said that the Chinese government are “ not bad folks , folks !
” Joe knew how Hunter ’ s Burisma ties looked and didn ’ t do a damned thing .
Probably because everyone thought that Crooked Hillary was going to win in 2016 and it wouldn ’ t have been an issue .
• Former Secretary of State John Kerry apparently lied in 2019 when he said he didn ’ t know about Hunter ’ s role on Burisma ’ s board .
• Huner was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paid a $ 7 million bribe to officials serving under Ukraine ’ s prosecutor general , Vitaly Yarema , to “ shut the case against Zlochevsky.
” • Hunter Biden received Secret Service protection on trips to multiple foreign locations , including Moscow , Beijing , Doha , Paris , Seoul , Manila , Tokyo , Mexico City , Milan , Florence , Shanghai , Geneva , London , Dublin , Munich , Berlin , Bogota , Abu Dhabi , Nairobi , Hong Kong , Taipei , Buenos Aires , Copenhagen , Johannesburg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lake Como .
• Andrii Telizhenko , the Democrats ’ personification of Russian disinformation , met with Obama administration officials , including Elisabeth Zentos , a member of Obama ’ s National Security Council , at least 10 times .
• Hunter Biden , his family , and Archer received millions of dollars from foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds , in addition to the $ 4 million he was paid by Burisma .
• Archer received $ 142,300 from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan , purportedly for a car , the same day Vice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minister Arsemy Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia ’ s actions in Crimea.Hunter Biden was a very busy boy !
The question is , what did his father know and when did he know it ?
• Hunter Biden opened a bank account with Gongwen Dong to fund a $ 100,000 global spending spree with James Biden and Sara Biden .
Here are the Key Findings of the report as written : • In early 2015 the former Acting Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to officials in Vice President Joe Biden ’ s office about the perception of a conflict of interest with respect to Hunter Biden ’ s role on Burisma ’ s board .
Kent ’ s concerns went unaddressed , and in September 2016 , he emphasized in an email to his colleagues , “ Furthermore , the presence of Hunter Biden on the Burisma board was very awkward for all U.S. officials pushing an anticorruption agenda in Ukraine.
” • In October 2015 , senior State Department official Amos Hochstein raised concerns with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with Hunter Biden , that Hunter Biden ’ s position on Burisma ’ s board enabled Russian disinformation efforts and risked undermining U.S. policy in Ukraine .
• Although Kent believed that Hunter Biden ’ s role on Burisma ’ s board was awkward for all U.S. officials pushing an anti-corruption agenda in Ukraine , the Committees are only aware of two individuals — Kent and former U.S. Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs Amos Hochstein — who raised concerns to Vice President Joe Biden ( Hochstein ) or his staff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Obama administration officials continued well past his presidency .
Former Secretary of State John Kerry had knowledge of Hunter Biden ’ s role on 5 Burisma ’ s board , but when asked about it at a town hall event in Nashua , N.H. on Dec. 8 , 2019 , Kerry falsely said , “ I had no knowledge about any of that .
None .
No.
” Evidence to the contrary is detailed in Section V. • Former Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland testified that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Ukraine .
Kent told the Committees that Zlochevsky was an “ odious oligarch.
” However , in December 2015 , instead of following U.S. objectives of confronting oligarchs , Vice President Biden ’ s staff advised him to avoid commenting on Zlochevsky and recommended he say , “ I ’ m not going to get into naming names or accusing individuals.
” • Hunter Biden was serving on Burisma ’ s board ( supposedly consulting on corporate governance and transparency ) when Zlochevsky allegedly paid a $ 7 million bribe to officials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Vitaly Yarema , to “ shut the case against Zlochevsky.
” Kent testified that this bribe occurred in December 2014 ( seven months after Hunter joined Burisma ’ s board ) , and , after learning about it , he and the Resident Legal Advisor reported this allegation to the FBI .
• Hunter Biden was a U.S. Secret Service protectee from Jan. 29 , 2009 to July 8 , 2014 .
A day before his last trip as a protectee , Time published an article describing Burisma ’ s ramped up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s involvement in Burisma ’ s board .
Before ending his protective detail , Hunter Biden received Secret Service protection on trips to multiple foreign locations , including Moscow , Beijing , Doha , Paris , Seoul , Manila , Tokyo , Mexico City , Milan , Florence , Shanghai , Geneva , London , Dublin , Munich , Berlin , Bogota , Abu Dhabi , Nairobi , Hong Kong , Taipei , Buenos Aires , Copenhagen , Johannesburg , Brussels , Madrid , Mumbai and Lake Como .
• Andrii Telizhenko @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disinformation , met with Obama administration officials , including Elisabeth Zentos , a member of Obama ’ s National Security Council , at least 10 times .
A Democrat lobbying firm , Blue Star Strategies , contracted with Telizhenko from 2016 to 2017 and continued to request his assistance as recent as the summer of 2019 .
A recent news article detailed other extensive contacts between Telizhenko and Obama administration officials .
• In addition to the over $ 4 million paid by Burisma for Hunter Biden ’ s and Archer ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ family , and Archer received millions of dollars from foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds .
• Archer received $ 142,300 from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan , purportedly for a car , the same day Vice President Joe Biden appeared with Ukrainian Prime Minister Arsemy Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia ’ s actions in Crimea .
• Hunter Biden received a $ 3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina , the wife of the former mayor of Moscow .
• Hunter Biden opened a bank account with Gongwen Dong to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with James Biden and Sara Biden .
• Hunter Biden had business associations with Ye Jianming , Gongwen Dong , and other Chinese nationals linked to the Communist government and the People ’ s Liberation Army .
Those associations resulted in millions of dollars in cash flow .
• Hunter Biden paid nonresident women who were nationals of Russia or other Eastern European countries and who appear to be linked to an “ Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring.
” Boy , that makes this Popular Mechanics feature pretty awkward , doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t on the ballot , but it ’ s pretty clear that the Biden family has cashed-in on Joe ’ s stint as Vice President .
Joe keeps saying that this election is about the “ battle for the soul of the nation ” and he ’ s not wrong .
The question is , will Americans vote to elect a man whose close family members have made themselves rich on the Biden name , or the guy who has donated his salary and is committed to draining The Swamp ?

The new allegations against the former Vice President’s son, Hunter, are absolutely explosive!
For a guy who appeared to like to get paid for doing nothing, Hunter Biden sure was busy!
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC) and the Committee on Finance have released their report on Hunter Biden and it is an 87-page wild ride!
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley(R-IA) launched the investigation after he raised concerns over conflict-of-interest regarding the sale of a U.S. company to a Chinese firm that had ties to Hunter Biden. Senator Grassley had sounded the alarm in August 2019–approximately four months before a whistleblower complaint was made regarding President Trump’s phone call to the newly-elected Ukrainian President which prompted Democrats to move to impeach the President.
OUT TODAY: Report with @chuckgrassley found millions of dollars in questionable financial transactions between Hunter Biden & his associates and foreign individuals, including the wife of the former mayor of Moscow. https://t.co/R1MxQ4xGKP — Senator Ron Johnson (@SenRonJohnson) September 23, 2020
Here’s the TL;DR version of the most interesting points:
Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the mayor of Moscow.
from Elena Baturina, Hunter Biden had business associations with Ye Jianming, Gongwen Dong, and other Chinese nationals linked to the Communist government and the People’s Liberation Army. Those associations resulted in millions of dollars in cash flow.
Those associations resulted in millions of dollars in cash flow. Hunter Biden paid nonresident women who were nationals of Russia or other Eastern European countries and who appear to be linked to an “Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring.”
Joe was warned by American officials in Ukraine–former Acting Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, George Kent and former U.S. Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs Amos Hochstein–that Hunter’s Burisma Board post was “very awkward for all U.S. officials pushing an anticorruption agenda in Ukraine,” and “enabled Russian disinformation efforts and risked undermining U.S. policy in Ukraine.”
Yikes! Democrats have been accusing President Trump of some sort of “bromance” with Putin, but Joe Biden’s son received millions from the Mayor of Moscow’s wife.
We knew that Hunter was kinda skeezy in his personal relationships, but paying for prostitutes who were trafficked seems to be a whole new level of skeeze.
The financial connections to the Chinese military personnel seems odd when Joe has sent manufacturing jobs over there and said that the Chinese government are “not bad folks, folks!”
Joe knew how Hunter’s Burisma ties looked and didn’t do a damned thing. Probably because everyone thought that Crooked Hillary was going to win in 2016 and it wouldn’t have been an issue.
More interesting tidbits summarized:
Former Secretary of State John Kerry apparently lied in 2019 when he said he didn’t know about Hunter’s role on Burisma’s board.
Huner was on the Burisma board when Zlochevsky allegedly paid a $7 million bribe to officials serving under Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Vitaly Yarema, to “shut the case against Zlochevsky.”
Hunter Biden received Secret Service protection on trips to multiple foreign locations, including Moscow, Beijing, Doha, Paris, Seoul, Manila, Tokyo, Mexico City, Milan, Florence, Shanghai, Geneva, London, Dublin, Munich, Berlin, Bogota, Abu Dhabi, Nairobi, Hong Kong, Taipei, Buenos Aires, Copenhagen, Johannesburg, Brussels, Madrid, Mumbai and Lake Como.
Andrii Telizhenko, the Democrats’ personification of Russian disinformation, met with Obama administration officials, including Elisabeth Zentos, a member of Obama’s National Security Council, at least 10 times.
Hunter Biden, his family, and Archer received millions of dollars from foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds, in addition to the $4 million he was paid by Burisma.
Archer received $142,300 from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan, purportedly for a car, the same day Vice President Joe Biden appeared with Ukrainian Prime Minister Arsemy Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia’s actions in Crimea.Hunter Biden was a very busy boy! The question is, what did his father know and when did he know it?
Hunter Biden opened a bank account with Gongwen Dong to fund a $100,000 global spending spree with James Biden and Sara Biden.
Here are the Key Findings of the report as written:
In early 2015 the former Acting Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, George Kent, raised concerns to officials in Vice President Joe Biden’s office about the perception of a conflict of interest with respect to Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board. Kent’s concerns went unaddressed, and in September 2016, he emphasized in an email to his colleagues , “Furthermore, the presence of Hunter Biden on the Burisma board was very awkward for all U.S. officials pushing an anticorruption agenda in Ukraine.”
In October 2015, senior State Department official Amos Hochstein raised concerns with Vice President Biden, as well as with Hunter Biden, that Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board enabled Russian disinformation efforts and risked undermining U.S. policy in Ukraine.
Although Kent believed that Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board was awkward for all U.S. officials pushing an anti-corruption agenda in Ukraine, the Committees are only aware of two individuals — Kent and former U.S. Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs Amos Hochstein — who raised concerns to Vice President Joe Biden (Hochstein) or his staff (Kent).
The awkwardness for Obama administration officials continued well past his presidency. Former Secretary of State John Kerry had knowledge of Hunter Biden’s role on 5 Burisma’s board, but when asked about it at a town hall event in Nashua, N.H. on Dec. 8, 2019, Kerry falsely said, “I had no knowledge about any of that. None. No.” Evidence to the contrary is detailed in Section V.
Former Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland testified that confronting oligarchs would send an anticorruption message in Ukraine. Kent told the Committees that Zlochevsky was an “odious oligarch.” However, in December 2015, instead of following U.S. objectives of confronting oligarchs, Vice President Biden’s staff advised him to avoid commenting on Zlochevsky and recommended he say, “I’m not going to get into naming names or accusing individuals.”
Hunter Biden was serving on Burisma’s board (supposedly consulting on corporate governance and transparency) when Zlochevsky allegedly paid a $7 million bribe to officials serving under Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Vitaly Yarema, to “shut the case against Zlochevsky.” Kent testified that this bribe occurred in December 2014 (seven months after Hunter joined Burisma’s board), and, after learning about it, he and the Resident Legal Advisor reported this allegation to the FBI.
Hunter Biden was a U.S. Secret Service protectee from Jan. 29, 2009 to July 8, 2014. A day before his last trip as a protectee, Time published an article describing Burisma’s ramped up lobbying efforts to U.S. officials and Hunter’s involvement in Burisma’s board. Before ending his protective detail, Hunter Biden received Secret Service protection on trips to multiple foreign locations, including Moscow, Beijing, Doha, Paris, Seoul, Manila, Tokyo, Mexico City, Milan, Florence, Shanghai, Geneva, London, Dublin, Munich, Berlin, Bogota, Abu Dhabi, Nairobi, Hong Kong, Taipei, Buenos Aires, Copenhagen, Johannesburg, Brussels, Madrid, Mumbai and Lake Como.
Andrii Telizhenko, the Democrats’ personification of Russian disinformation, met with Obama administration officials, including Elisabeth Zentos, a member of Obama’s National Security Council, at least 10 times. A Democrat lobbying firm, Blue Star Strategies, contracted with Telizhenko from 2016 to 2017 and continued to request his assistance as recent as the summer of 2019. A recent news article detailed other extensive contacts between Telizhenko and Obama administration officials.
In addition to the over $4 million paid by Burisma for Hunter Biden’s and Archer’s board memberships, Hunter Biden, his family, and Archer received millions of dollars from foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds.
Archer received $142,300 from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan, purportedly for a car, the same day Vice President Joe Biden appeared with Ukrainian Prime Minister Arsemy Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia’s actions in Crimea.
Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow.
Hunter Biden opened a bank account with Gongwen Dong to fund a $100,000 global spending spree with James Biden and Sara Biden.
Hunter Biden had business associations with Ye Jianming, Gongwen Dong, and other Chinese nationals linked to the Communist government and the People’s Liberation Army. Those associations resulted in millions of dollars in cash flow.
Hunter Biden paid nonresident women who were nationals of Russia or other Eastern European countries and who appear to be linked to an “Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring.”
Source: Senate Ukraine Report
Boy, that makes this Popular Mechanics feature pretty awkward, doesn’t it?
Hunter Biden isn’t on the ballot, but it’s pretty clear that the Biden family has cashed-in on Joe’s stint as Vice President.
Joe keeps saying that this election is about the “battle for the soul of the nation” and he’s not wrong. The question is, will Americans vote to elect a man whose close family members have made themselves rich on the Biden name, or the guy who has donated his salary and is committed to draining The Swamp?


No Backing Down

The United States was bitterly divided .
Heated rhetoric , bitterness , and threats dominated discussion .
The country seemed poised to split as a monumental presidential election loomed .
The preceding sentence was written about the United States in 1860 .
The nation was divided about slavery and , in 1860 , this issue finally came to a head , fracturing the formerly dominant Democratic Party into Southern and Northern factions , creating a Constitutional Union Party , and bringing Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party to power without the support of a single Southern state .
In fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ballot in ten of those southern states .
Barely more than a month following Lincoln ’ s victory came declarations of secession by South Carolina and other states , which were rejected as illegal by the then-current President , James Buchanan , and President-elect Abraham Lincoln .
1860 was an ugly time for the United States .
I ’ m convinced 2020 may have a lot in common with its 160-year-old forebearer .
We are again a sharply divided country .
Bitterness and hate clog the social media outlets .
Lies and threats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media accomplices .
And just like in 1860 , the root of the division is the view of America espoused by the two dominant parties : Democrats and the Republicans .
I am equally convinced , that , just as it was in 1860 , the Republican vision of America must prevail if we are to remain “ one nation under God.
” All GOP leaders and voters must recognize the soul of the nation is on the ballot .
This election is another of the country ’ s crossroads moments .
Justice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us , as a nation , of our values and the importance of the Supreme Court .
Certainly , Justice Ginsburg accomplished a lot in her time , but she is a hero only to the cultural left .
She is no hero to conservatives ; whose values often opposed her own .
Planned Parenthood , in a tribute to Justice Ginsburg , noted , “ At her confirmation hearings , RBG openly declared that abortion access is a constitutional right.
” The GOP must support President Trump and his nominee to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the heart of the 2016 election , an election won by Trump .
It is abundantly clear that politics 2020 is not a gentleman ’ s game .
It is a war that will determine what kind of country we are and will be .
Byron York tweeted , “ Trump has made first-rate SCOTUS picks .
If he does so again , there will be no way a Republican can oppose on substance .
To oppose would require siding with Democrats on process argument — a tough place for most Republicans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ballot .
Those values are now embodied by the nominees to the Court .
Consider the stark difference .
Trump will nominate a woman who believes in the Constitution as written , who respects the 2nd Amendment and recognizes the importance of life .
Ask yourself , what kind of person will Joe Biden nominate ?
It is telling that he won ’ t say .
I believe that ’ s because he ’ ll nominate a cultural liberal .
He ’ ll choose someone who is okay with attacks on law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who is good with abortion on demand .
He ’ ll nominate someone who is fine with bringing socialism into the American way of life .
The difference between them is huge .
This is not the time for compromise and appeasement .
Slavery had to end in America in the 1860s .
They ’ d tried to compromise , and it failed .
Those who supported slavery had to be defeated .
The same is true now .
We can not compromise with those who attack the police , disdain the military @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history .
They have to be defeated .
The Democrats do not act in good faith .
Since Ginsburg ’ s passing the Democrats and their media lackeys have threatened , if Biden wins in November , to… Anyone who somehow thinks that approving a nominee for the Supreme Court is unseemly this close to an election is not paying attention .
The Democrats have no rule book and no decency .
If Trump wins in November , they will vehemently oppose any nominee he makes , whether it be September or January @ @ @ @ @ @ @ District , John Paul Moran gets it .
He tweeted , “ After Kavanaugh , everything changed with me…That marked the end of the Democrats as we knew them .
That is when they went from a party that disagreed , to a party that would do anything to gain + retain power.
” That ’ s the goal for the Democrats .
They don ’ t care about the people , only power .
To defeat them , we all must vote .
No backing down .

The United States was bitterly divided. Heated rhetoric, bitterness, and threats dominated discussion. The country seemed poised to split as a monumental presidential election loomed.
The preceding sentence was written about the United States in 1860. The nation was divided about slavery and, in 1860, this issue finally came to a head, fracturing the formerly dominant Democratic Party into Southern and Northern factions, creating a Constitutional Union Party, and bringing Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party to power without the support of a single Southern state. In fact, Lincoln wasn’t on the ballot in ten of those southern states.
Barely more than a month following Lincoln’s victory came declarations of secession by South Carolina and other states, which were rejected as illegal by the then-current President, James Buchanan, and President-elect Abraham Lincoln.
1860 was an ugly time for the United States.
I’m convinced 2020 may have a lot in common with its 160-year-old forebearer. We are again a sharply divided country. Bitterness and hate clog the social media outlets. Lies and threats are being tossed out by politicians and media accomplices.
And just like in 1860, the root of the division is the view of America espoused by the two dominant parties: Democrats and the Republicans. I am equally convinced, that, just as it was in 1860, the Republican vision of America must prevail if we are to remain “one nation under God.”
All GOP leaders and voters must recognize the soul of the nation is on the ballot. This election is another of the country’s crossroads moments.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death reminds us, as a nation, of our values and the importance of the Supreme Court. Certainly, Justice Ginsburg accomplished a lot in her time, but she is a hero only to the cultural left. She is no hero to conservatives; whose values often opposed her own.
Planned Parenthood, in a tribute to Justice Ginsburg, noted, “At her confirmation hearings, RBG openly declared that abortion access is a constitutional right.”
The GOP must support President Trump and his nominee to the Court. That’s what was at the heart of the 2016 election, an election won by Trump. It is abundantly clear that politics 2020 is not a gentleman’s game. It is a war that will determine what kind of country we are and will be.
Byron York tweeted, “Trump has made first-rate SCOTUS picks. If he does so again, there will be no way a Republican can oppose on substance. To oppose would require siding with Democrats on process argument — a tough place for most Republicans to be.”
Romney decision makes sense. Trump has made first-rate SCOTUS picks. If he does so again, there will be no way a Republican can oppose on substance. To oppose would require siding with Democrats on process argument — a tough place for most Republicans to be. — Byron York (@ByronYork) September 22, 2020
Republican values are on the ballot. Those values are now embodied by the nominees to the Court. Consider the stark difference.
Trump will nominate a woman who believes in the Constitution as written, who respects the 2nd Amendment and recognizes the importance of life.
Ask yourself, what kind of person will Joe Biden nominate? It is telling that he won’t say. I believe that’s because he’ll nominate a cultural liberal. He’ll choose someone who is okay with attacks on law enforcement. He’ll choose someone who is good with abortion on demand. He’ll nominate someone who is fine with bringing socialism into the American way of life.
The difference between them is huge. This is not the time for compromise and appeasement. Slavery had to end in America in the 1860s. They’d tried to compromise, and it failed. Those who supported slavery had to be defeated.
The same is true now. We cannot compromise with those who attack the police, disdain the military, and tear down America’s history. They have to be defeated.
The Democrats do not act in good faith. Since Ginsburg’s passing the Democrats and their media lackeys have threatened, if Biden wins in November, to…
Abolish the Electoral College
Pack the Supreme Court
Impeach President Trump
Instigate and Support Violence and Destruction
Anyone who somehow thinks that approving a nominee for the Supreme Court is unseemly this close to an election is not paying attention. The Democrats have no rule book and no decency. If Trump wins in November, they will vehemently oppose any nominee he makes, whether it be September or January.
Republican candidate for Massachusetts 6th House District, John Paul Moran gets it. He tweeted, “After Kavanaugh, everything changed with me…That marked the end of the Democrats as we knew them. That is when they went from a party that disagreed, to a party that would do anything to gain + retain power.”
After Kavanaugh, everything changed with me… That marked the end of the Democrats as we knew them. That is when they went from a party that disagreed, to a party that would do anything to gain + retain power. — John Paul Moran For Congress (R-MA6) (@JohnPaul4Mass) September 22, 2020
That’s the goal for the Democrats. They don’t care about the people, only power. To defeat them, we all must vote. No backing down.


clashdaily--2020-09-24--LOUISVILLE RIOTS: Two Police Shot In Clashes At Protests After Announcement About

Right on cue , BLM Activists wasted no time in leveraging the news about Breonna to start cranking up the @ @ @ @ @ a UHaul truck loaded up with riot gear ready to go and get handed out @ @ @ @ @ of tweets by those who were keeping us appraised of what was going on … @ @ @ @ @ now Portland is kicking things up into high gear , too .
Antifa punks like @ @ @ @ @ Kamala and Hollywood be pouring money out to bail these folks out now that police @ @ @ @ @ the name of ‘ peaceful protests ’ ?

Right on cue, BLM Activists wasted no time in leveraging the news about Breonna to start cranking up the riot machine.
They had a UHaul truck loaded up with riot gear ready to go and get handed out.
Linda Sarsour showed up ready to ‘party’.
I don’t think she’s from Kentucky, and if she’s not, I strongly believe that the @FBI and @TheJusticeDept should be looking at exactly what she was doing there. It is a federal crime to cross state lines for the purpose of rioting and arson. https://t.co/YHtnwzDuod — Bernard B. Kerik (@BernardKerik) September 24, 2020
She wasn’t alone.
The protesting BLM crowd is now marching through the streets of Louisville. They have chanted, “No lives matter till black lives matter!” pic.twitter.com/f3qJPNjwxt — Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) September 23, 2020
Here are a number of tweets by those who were keeping us appraised of what was going on … as it happened.
Louisville, Ky.: Angry BLM rioters, some carrying sticks, confront cops in the street. pic.twitter.com/yoqp43s6m4 — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) September 23, 2020
BLM-antifa rioters in Louisville, Ky. set fire to the Hall of Justice courthouse. pic.twitter.com/SbauZOfssY — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) September 24, 2020
That’s it folks. They’ve crossed the line. Black Lives Matter militants are shooting police in Louisville. pic.twitter.com/eY0ihTaa61 — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 24, 2020
Louisville: Here is the moment the gun shots rang out After police fired 2 intimidating non lethal munitions in the sky You can hear 9 gun shots fired following the 2 munitions pic.twitter.com/z1QbsBEYCx — Drew Hernandez (@livesmattershow) September 24, 2020
Louisville police run by saying officer down. Local news in Louisville is now reporting someone did shoot at law enforcement. Pray for @lmpd! pic.twitter.com/t41Ty4iDLR — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) September 24, 2020
LATEST: Police said two officers were shot during demonstrations that erupted after a Kentucky grand jury indicted one officer for allegedly endangering the neighbors of Breonna Taylor during the police shooting that resulted in her death.https://t.co/z0Imi84VNh pic.twitter.com/lQMnHdtE60 — ABC News (@ABC) September 24, 2020
\
Helluva night.
And now Portland is kicking things up into high gear, too. Antifa punks like to play with fire…
Portland: BLM-antifa rioters set the @PortlandPolice central precinct on fire. They’ve also broken out the windows high up by throwing large rocks. #PortlandRiots #antifa pic.twitter.com/uMBQGC0WF1 — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) September 24, 2020
The #antifa mob in Portland cheer as one of their comrades hurls an incendiary device at @PortlandPolice tonight. #PortlandRiots pic.twitter.com/LZPM3VvQIZ — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) September 24, 2020
Will Kamala and Hollywood be pouring money out to bail these folks out now that police officers are being shot in the name of ‘peaceful protests’?


clashdaily--2020-09-24--Seattle Pays $150,000 To Convicted Pimp To Offer ‘Alternatives’ To Traditional Policing–No, This Is

Seattle Pays $150,000 To Convicted Pimp To Offer ‘Alternatives’ To Traditional Policing–No, This Is Not Satire

What the hell are these people smoking ?
The same city council who decided to slash police spending came up with a really expensive and unlikely plan on how they should go about restoring order to the city .
They are paying a convicted pimp a six-figure salary to … something , something , something .
Seattle now has on its payroll a convicted pimp who once vowed to “ go to war ” with the city — a $ 150,000 “ street czar ” whose mission is to come up with “ alternatives to policing , ” reports said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the documentary “ American Pimp ” about his life as “ Gorgeous Dre ” — is getting $ 12,500 per month for a year , along with an office in Seattle ’ s Municipal Tower , according to the contract published by PubliCola .
It comes just a year after his organization , Not This Time , was paid $ 100,000 to sponsor a speaker series that was called “ Conversations with the Streets.
” … “ Don ’ t just leave .
Leave with something , ” he told activists in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them to demand $ 2 million to exit the site of much of the city ’ s worst violence this year , the report said .
They ignored his advice , the paper said , with one saying the money grab felt “ off.
” …Some of the girls he pimped for were underage , according to court reports in the Las Vegas Sun .
“ I was born from the streets ; I come out of the deep darkness , ” he said in a YouTube video earlier this year , bragging @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the women who were with me ” when he was a pimp .
—NewYorkPost Why was this guy ‘ going to war ’ in the first place ?
That was because his brother ‘ Che ’ was killed in — you guessed it — a police shooting .
The only thing we know about this guy is that he will do pretty nearly anything for a buck — including manipulation , exploitation , and conning .
Great job .
Can ’ t possibly imagine how this plan could go awry .

What the hell are these people smoking?
The same city council who decided to slash police spending came up with a really expensive and unlikely plan on how they should go about restoring order to the city.
They are paying a convicted pimp a six-figure salary to … something, something, something.
Seattle now has on its payroll a convicted pimp who once vowed to “go to war” with the city — a $150,000 “street czar” whose mission is to come up with “alternatives to policing,” reports said. Andre Taylor — who appeared in the documentary “American Pimp” about his life as “Gorgeous Dre” — is getting $12,500 per month for a year, along with an office in Seattle’s Municipal Tower, according to the contract published by PubliCola. It comes just a year after his organization, Not This Time, was paid $100,000 to sponsor a speaker series that was called “Conversations with the Streets.” …“Don’t just leave. Leave with something,” he told activists in a meeting caught in a recording, telling them to demand $2 million to exit the site of much of the city’s worst violence this year, the report said. They ignored his advice, the paper said, with one saying the money grab felt “off.” …Some of the girls he pimped for were underage, according to court reports in the Las Vegas Sun. “I was born from the streets; I come out of the deep darkness,” he said in a YouTube video earlier this year, bragging how he “had children with some of the women who were with me” when he was a pimp. —NewYorkPost
Why was this guy ‘going to war’ in the first place?
That was because his brother ‘Che’ was killed in — you guessed it — a police shooting.
The only thing we know about this guy is that he will do pretty nearly anything for a buck — including manipulation, exploitation, and conning.
Your tax dollars at work, Seattle.
Great job. Can’t possibly imagine how this plan could go awry.


clashdaily--2020-09-24--Press Gallery Drops Gotcha Question About Meghan And Harry… Trump Gets Last Laugh (VIDEO)

They are flipping every rock they can find to get stories critical of Trump .
Now they ’ re trotting out the opinions of washed-up former British royals .
If they thought they would score a hit with that question , they were sadly mistaken .
Not only does Trump not care about how Harry and what ’ s-her-name feel about him , he had a really casual and dismissive back-handed swipe at them both .
She clearly doesn ’ t rise to the level of threat that someone deserving his undivided attention would command .
And his answer is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ talking about .
Trump isn ’ t exactly starstruck .
He ’ s seen most of these supposedly ‘ important ’ people when the cameras aren ’ t rolling .
And they ’ re just as human as the rest of us .
He didn ’ t get animated or worked up .
She wasn ’ t worth the effort .
But — like the rest of us — he ’ s seen what hitching his wagon to Meghan has meant for Harry .
Actually , that ’ s exactly what seems to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American Male by Doug Giles Doug Giles , best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog , ClashDaily.com , has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity .
That is , if the man-child will put down his frappuccino ; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome .
Buy Now : The Effeminization Of The American Male We saw this coming a mile away : • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hunting Because His Wife Disapproves • WATCH : ‘ Woke ’ Prince Harry Apologizes For The World ’ s ‘ Institutional Racism ’ And ‘ Unconscious Bias ’

They are flipping every rock they can find to get stories critical of Trump. Now they’re trotting out the opinions of washed-up former British royals.
If they thought they would score a hit with that question, they were sadly mistaken.
Not only does Trump not care about how Harry and what’s-her-name feel about him, he had a really casual and dismissive back-handed swipe at them both.
She clearly doesn’t rise to the level of threat that someone deserving his undivided attention would command. And his answer is in keeping with who he’s talking about.
Trump isn’t exactly starstruck. He’s seen most of these supposedly ‘important’ people when the cameras aren’t rolling. And they’re just as human as the rest of us.
The President @realDonaldTrump has been asked about Harry and Meghan during a press conference – “I’m not a fan of hers and I would say this…I wish a lot of luck to Harry because he’s going to need it.” pic.twitter.com/S9evvXqEUY — Lizzie Robinson (@LizzieITV) September 23, 2020
He didn’t get animated or worked up. She wasn’t worth the effort.
‘I’m not a fan of hers.’
No kidding.
But — like the rest of us — he’s seen what hitching his wagon to Meghan has meant for Harry.
Actually, that’s exactly what seems to have happened.
The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now:The Effeminization Of The American Male
We saw this coming a mile away: