clashdaily--2020-01-17--Meet Ilhan Omar’s GOP Rival … The Iraqi Refugee Says Omar ‘Must Be Stopped’ (Video)

One Muslim refugee who divides the country and one Muslim refugee that wants to unite it .
This should be an interesting race .
Dalia al-Aqid came to the United States as a refugee fleeing Saddam Hussein ’ s regime in 1988 .
On Thursday al-Aqid , a former White House correspondent who is also a Trump-supporter , announced that she was going to run against Rep. Ilhan Omar ( D-MN ) to represent Minnesota ’ s 5th Congressional District .
Al-Aqid points out in her video that both women have similar stories .
They both came as children to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ war-torn country , they ’ re both women and Muslim , but despite those similarities , they have very different perspectives .
She said that although Rep. Omar claims to be a spokeswoman for Muslims in America , “ she doesn ’ t speak for me.
” She also stated that she is tired of the division that the scandal-plagued Rep. Omar has wrought in her few short years in office .
Her video highlights the killing of terrorist Qasem Soleimani and Rep. Omar ’ s condemnation of the President ’ s decision @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s enemies .
Al-Aqid praised the Trump administration ’ s policy in the Middle East , especially the decision to kill Soleimani , calling him a “ vicious terrorist thug.
” She said that she was “ disgusted ” by the way that Democrats have “ sided with a terrorist ” and says , “ In times like this our country needs to rally together , not push each other apart.
” In an exclusive interview with The Daily Wire , al-Aqid said that she decided to run for Congress because Omar was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the U.S.—she must be stopped .
Her consistent anti-Semitism and hateful rhetoric are toxic and serve only to gain attention for herself and position herself as a celebrity—she ’ s not fighting for us ; she is fighting for herself , even if that means fighting against us.
” Al-Aqid didn ’ t take any cheap shots against Omar personally , even though they ’ re right there in the open and some of her sordid personal history is currently being investigated by the FBI .
She focused on Omar ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , what she hasn ’ t done for Minnesota or America as a whole , and how she seems to be on the wrong side of just about every issue .
It looks as though the race for Minnesota ’ s 5th Congressional District will be very interesting indeed .
• BOMBSHELL : Ilhan Omar Appears To Be Under Investigation By An Alphabet Soup Of Federal Agencies — Including ICE • WATCH : Ilhan Omar Tries To Explain The Difference Between Iranian Sanctions And The BDS Movement • Corroboration : 2nd Witness Testifies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ & Iran • Ilhan Omar : Here ’ s Yet ANOTHER 6-Figure Allegation Of Campaign Finance Fraud • Erdogan ’ s BFF , Ilhan Omar , Votes ‘ PRESENT ’ On Resolution To Recognize The Armenian Genocide

One Muslim refugee who divides the country and one Muslim refugee that wants to unite it. This should be an interesting race.
Dalia al-Aqid came to the United States as a refugee fleeing Saddam Hussein’s regime in 1988. On Thursday al-Aqid, a former White House correspondent who is also a Trump-supporter, announced that she was going to run against Rep. Ilhan Omar(D-MN) to represent Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District.
Al-Aqid points out in her video that both women have similar stories. They both came as children to the United States as refugees fleeing a war-torn country, they’re both women and Muslim, but despite those similarities, they have very different perspectives. She said that although Rep. Omar claims to be a spokeswoman for Muslims in America, “she doesn’t speak for me.”
She also stated that she is tired of the division that the scandal-plagued Rep. Omar has wrought in her few short years in office. Her video highlights the killing of terrorist Qasem Soleimani and Rep. Omar’s condemnation of the President’s decision as proof of siding with America’s enemies.
Al-Aqid praised the Trump administration’s policy in the Middle East, especially the decision to kill Soleimani, calling him a “vicious terrorist thug.” She said that she was “disgusted” by the way that Democrats have “sided with a terrorist” and says, “In times like this our country needs to rally together, not push each other apart.”
In an exclusive interview with The Daily Wire, al-Aqid said that she decided to run for Congress because Omar was “doing irreparable harm to both Minnesota and the U.S.—she must be stopped. Her consistent anti-Semitism and hateful rhetoric are toxic and serve only to gain attention for herself and position herself as a celebrity—she’s not fighting for us; she is fighting for herself, even if that means fighting against us.”
It’s time to defend America! I’m running for Congress because we’re not as divided as Ilhan Omar and the far-left would have us believe. I’m running to bring us closer together. https://t.co/sa9dsHHTeO — Dalia al-Aqidi (@Dalia4Congress) January 16, 2020
Al-Aqid didn’t take any cheap shots against Omar personally, even though they’re right there in the open and some of her sordid personal history is currently being investigated by the FBI. She focused on Omar’s political positions, her public anti-Semitic statements, what she hasn’t done for Minnesota or America as a whole, and how she seems to be on the wrong side of just about every issue.
It looks as though the race for Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District will be very interesting indeed.
Related:


clashdaily--2020-01-17--Putting The ‘Fat’ In Fatwa: ‘Big’ ISIS Head Arrested In Mosul — Twitter Reactions Are Comedy GOLD

Not to brag or anything but this arrest was HUGE .
Not much of a flight risk , this one @ @ @ @ @ make it up to his feet , how fast could his mobility scooter possibly go @ @ @ @ @ Mexico Is Paying Women To Get Pregnant Via IVF And Then Abort For 'Embryonic Research' @ @ @ @ @ How about this guy ?
The ‘ Fat ’ part is obvious .
But what @ @ @ @ @ Don ’ t worry , he ’ s got that covered , too .
The @ @ @ @ @ We save the best for last .
Laughing at his lack of any self-discipline .
@ @ @ @ @ next one .
What ?
We warned you .
This one would upset him .
@ @ @ @ @ our favorite , for fans of Jaws…

Not to brag or anything but this arrest was HUGE.
Not much of a flight risk, this one. Even if he CAN make it up to his feet, how fast could his mobility scooter possibly go?
Latest photos for #ISIS Mufti. He was the strongest supporter of demolishing Mosul heritage. He used to give the Friday Sermon in my neighborhood. He cheered up in the very Friday after the blowing of Prophet Jonah Mosque in the early days of their invasion.
? Social media https://t.co/VWOCR4nmJE pic.twitter.com/zGYoVSuAaF — Ali Y. Al-Baroodi (@AliBaroodi) January 16, 2020
Remind you of anybody? How about this guy?
He’s a … Fat Bastard.
The ‘Fat’ part is obvious. But what about the bastard part?
Don’t worry, he’s got that covered, too.
Unconfirmed news say SWAT raided the house where he was hiding in Mansoor nhood, W Mosul.
I wish you all the justice in the world for all the crimes you gave the execuse to commit. Many families will cheer up tonight, but that unfortunately will not bring their beloved back. — Ali Y. Al-Baroodi (@AliBaroodi) January 16, 2020
The humor covered the gamut. We save the best for last.
There were hunger strike jokes.
Glad this guy got arrested. Clearly not gonna be one of those “hunger strike” prisoners either. https://t.co/qvkFJuC7tb — Jesse Kelly (@JesseKellyDC) January 16, 2020
Relevant Gifs…
Putting the FAT in Fatwa…
Hollywood references…
Laughing at his lack of any self-discipline.
Oof.
Apologies in advance for the next one.
What? We warned you.
More open mockery.
Another play on words mocking jihadis:
This one would upset him. (Good.)
And our favorite, for fans of Jaws…


clashdaily--2020-01-17--New Trump Art: You Tell ’em I’m Coming And America’s Coming With Me!

Part of Trump ’ s appeal is his take-on-all-comers fighting spirit , a fighting spirit captured in this latest adaption @ @ @ @ @ .
Tombstone .
It ’ s a great flick about men who won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ save their town when the going gets tough .
Sound familiar ?
Instead of that @ @ @ @ @ them I ’ m coming , and Hell is coming with me ’ , we @ @ @ @ @ into that same scene , with ‘ America coming with me ’ .
And with @ @ @ @ @ like Virginia getting bolder about stripping our rights , what more perfect way to get @ @ @ @ @ one : If you want something more portable , you can have it on a @ @ @ @ @ , or even a pin .
So you can have the fun of triggering snowflakes @ @ @ @ @ .

Hogg is once again proving there is a difference between having an Ivy League degree and being actually educated.


clashdaily--2020-01-17--RED ALERT: CBP Warns Of 4 Iranians With Explosives Attempting To Cross Mexicali Border

Arizona CBP issues Terrorist advisory at the US border due to an Iranian terror threat .
Mexicali Police Chief Maria @ @ @ @ @ red alert has been issued at the Mexicali border due to a possible Iranian terrorist @ @ @ @ @ , the terrorist advisory was received Thursday from Customs and Border Protection in Arizona .
@ @ @ @ @ four nationals of Iran possibly carrying explosives were going to attempt to cross the border @ @ @ @ @ Luis to Mexicali .
We were told it was three men and a woman to @ @ @ @ @ , “ said Andrade .
Upon the alert issued , Operation Shield has now been @ @ @ @ @ to Andrade , all law enforcement in the city is currently on high alert .
@ @ @ @ @ Mexicali law enforcement to issue the alert for the next 48 hours , but Andrade @ @ @ @ @ alert for 72 hours .
“ We have no incident that has happened as of @ @ @ @ @ accordingly and we will not underestimate these threats , ” said Andrade .

Arizona CBP issues Terrorist advisory at the US border due to an Iranian terror threat.
(Is this a bad time to mention that there wasn’t a single question about border security at the last Democratic debate?)
Mexicali Police Chief Maria Elena Andrade confirmed that a red alert has been issued at the Mexicali border due to a possible Iranian terrorist threat.
According to Andrade, the terrorist advisory was received Thursday from Customs and Border Protection in Arizona.
“We received reports that four nationals of Iran possibly carrying explosives were going to attempt to cross the border in the area of San Luis to Mexicali. We were told it was three men and a woman to be on the lookout for, “ said Andrade.
Upon the alert issued, Operation Shield has now been activated in Mexicali.
According to Andrade, all law enforcement in the city is currently on high alert.
The chief said CBP asked Mexicali law enforcement to issue the alert for the next 48 hours, but Andrade said she has extended the alert for 72 hours.
“We have no incident that has happened as of now, we are responding accordingly and we will not underestimate these threats,” said Andrade.


clashdaily--2020-01-17--Hey NEVERTRUMPKINS: DJT Declares Religious Freedom Day 2020 And There’s More

For the third consecutive year , Trump has proclaimed ‘ Religious Freedom Day ’ .
This year , he also made some interesting changes .
Naturally , some outlets have already framed it as him trying to kiss up to the Evangelicals in his base .
Others have found reasons to bitch and whine that he is ‘ pushing ’ prayer in schools and funding religious groups .
As usual , they ’ re missing the point .
But they got one thing right… he ’ s cutting some restrictions that have hamstrung religious individuals and groups in any setting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ announcement : From its opening pages , the story of America has been rooted in the truth that all men and women are endowed with the right to follow their conscience , worship freely , and live in accordance with their convictions .
On Religious Freedom Day , we honor the foundational link between freedom and faith in our country and reaffirm our commitment to safeguarding the religious liberty of all Americans .
Religious freedom in America , often referred to as our “ first freedom , ” was a driving force behind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our American identity .
The desire for religious freedom impelled the Pilgrims to leave their homes in Europe and journey to a distant land , and it is the reason so many others seeking to live out their faith or change their faith have made America their home .
More than 230 years ago , the Virginia General Assembly passed the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom , which was authored and championed by Thomas Jefferson .
Jefferson famously expounded that “ all men shall be free to profess , and by argument to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Religion , and that the same shall in no wise diminish , enlarge or affect their civil capacities.
” This statute served as the catalyst for the First Amendment , which enshrined in law our conviction to prevent government interference in religion .
More than 200 years later , thanks to the power of that Amendment , America is one of the most religiously diverse nations in the world .
Since I took office , my Administration has been committed to protecting religious liberty .
In May 2017 , I signed an Executive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and institutions , and I stopped the Johnson Amendment from interfering with pastors ’ right to speak their minds .
Over the last 3 years , the Department of Justice has obtained 14 convictions in cases involving attacks or threats against places of worship .
To fight the rise of anti-Semitism in our country , I signed an Executive Order last month to ensure that Federal agencies are using nondiscrimination authorities to combat this venomous bigotry .
I have also made clear that my Administration will not tolerate the violation of any American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ openly and to live as his or her faith commands .
My Administration also remains cognizant of the stark realities for people seeking religious liberty abroad and has made protecting religious minorities a core pillar of my Administration ’ s foreign policy .
Repressive governments persecute religious worshipers using high-tech surveillance , mass detention , and torture , while terrorist organizations carry out barbaric violence against innocent victims on account of their religion .
To cast a light on these abuses , in July 2019 , I welcomed survivors of religious persecution from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ These survivors included Christians , Jews , and Muslims , who all shared similar stories of persecution .
At the United Nations in September , I called on global leaders to take concrete steps to prevent state and non‑state actors from attacking citizens for their beliefs and to help ensure the sanctity and safety of places of worship .
And , last summer , the State Department convened its second Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom , where our diplomats engaged a broad range of stakeholders in government and civil society , both religious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to combat religious persecution and discrimination around the world and ensure greater respect for freedom of religion and belief .
On this Religious Freedom Day , we reaffirm our commitment to protecting the precious and fundamental right of religious freedom , both at home and abroad .
Our Founders entrusted the American people with a responsibility to protect religious liberty so that our Nation may stand as a bright beacon for the rest of the world .
Today , we remain committed to that sacred endeavor and strive to support those around the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that impose restrictions on freedom of religion .
NOW , THEREFORE , I , DONALD J. TRUMP , President of the United States of America , by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States , do hereby proclaim January 16 , 2020 , as Religious Freedom Day .
I call on all Americans to commemorate this day with events and activities that remind us of our shared heritage of religious liberty and that teach us how to secure this blessing both at home @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day of January , in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty , and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-fourth .
The president is reversing the course Obama took of restricting and diminishing the presence of religious people in the public square , including schools .
The new rules from the Education Department require public school districts to verify that they don ’ t infringe upon teachers ’ or students ’ rights to pray @ @ @ @ @ @ @ report any complaints about school districts violating such rights , although school districts accused of other types of discrimination face no such requirement .
“ Our actions today will protect the constitutional rights of students , teachers , and faith-based institutions , ” Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos said in a statement .
“ The department ’ s efforts will level the playing field between religious and non-religious organizations competing for federal grants , as well as protect First Amendment freedoms on campus and the religious liberty of faith-based institutions.
” Another change @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of an Obama-era executive order that mandated religious providers tell their beneficiaries about their right to see a secular provider .
The Trump administration says this notice and referral requirement placed an undue burden on religious organizations .
— Source : Courthouse News We ’ ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with a less than stellar past , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

For the third consecutive year, Trump has proclaimed ‘Religious Freedom Day’. This year, he also made some interesting changes.
Naturally, some outlets have already framed it as him trying to kiss up to the Evangelicals in his base. Others have found reasons to bitch and whine that he is ‘pushing’ prayer in schools and funding religious groups.
As usual, they’re missing the point. But they got one thing right… he’s cutting some restrictions that have hamstrung religious individuals and groups in any setting involving federal funds.
Here is the announcement:
From its opening pages, the story of America has been rooted in the truth that all men and women are endowed with the right to follow their conscience, worship freely, and live in accordance with their convictions. On Religious Freedom Day, we honor the foundational link between freedom and faith in our country and reaffirm our commitment to safeguarding the religious liberty of all Americans. Religious freedom in America, often referred to as our “first freedom,” was a driving force behind some of the earliest defining moments of our American identity. The desire for religious freedom impelled the Pilgrims to leave their homes in Europe and journey to a distant land, and it is the reason so many others seeking to live out their faith or change their faith have made America their home. More than 230 years ago, the Virginia General Assembly passed the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, which was authored and championed by Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson famously expounded that “all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of Religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge or affect their civil capacities.” This statute served as the catalyst for the First Amendment, which enshrined in law our conviction to prevent government interference in religion. More than 200 years later, thanks to the power of that Amendment, America is one of the most religiously diverse nations in the world. Since I took office, my Administration has been committed to protecting religious liberty. In May 2017, I signed an Executive Order to advance religious freedom for individuals and institutions, and I stopped the Johnson Amendment from interfering with pastors’ right to speak their minds. Over the last 3 years, the Department of Justice has obtained 14 convictions in cases involving attacks or threats against places of worship. To fight the rise of anti-Semitism in our country, I signed an Executive Order last month to ensure that Federal agencies are using nondiscrimination authorities to combat this venomous bigotry. I have also made clear that my Administration will not tolerate the violation of any American’s ability to worship freely and openly and to live as his or her faith commands. My Administration also remains cognizant of the stark realities for people seeking religious liberty abroad and has made protecting religious minorities a core pillar of my Administration’s foreign policy. Repressive governments persecute religious worshipers using high-tech surveillance, mass detention, and torture, while terrorist organizations carry out barbaric violence against innocent victims on account of their religion. To cast a light on these abuses, in July 2019, I welcomed survivors of religious persecution from 16 countries into the Oval Office. These survivors included Christians, Jews, and Muslims, who all shared similar stories of persecution. At the United Nations in September, I called on global leaders to take concrete steps to prevent state and non‑state actors from attacking citizens for their beliefs and to help ensure the sanctity and safety of places of worship. And, last summer, the State Department convened its second Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom, where our diplomats engaged a broad range of stakeholders in government and civil society, both religious and secular, to identify concrete ways to combat religious persecution and discrimination around the world and ensure greater respect for freedom of religion and belief. On this Religious Freedom Day, we reaffirm our commitment to protecting the precious and fundamental right of religious freedom, both at home and abroad. Our Founders entrusted the American people with a responsibility to protect religious liberty so that our Nation may stand as a bright beacon for the rest of the world. Today, we remain committed to that sacred endeavor and strive to support those around the world who still struggle under oppressive regimes that impose restrictions on freedom of religion. NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 16, 2020, as Religious Freedom Day. I call on all Americans to commemorate this day with events and activities that remind us of our shared heritage of religious liberty and that teach us how to secure this blessing both at home and around the world. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-fourth. DONALD J. TRUMP
The president is reversing the course Obama took of restricting and diminishing the presence of religious people in the public square, including schools.
The new rules from the Education Department require public school districts to verify that they don’t infringe upon teachers’ or students’ rights to pray at school. States must now also report any complaints about school districts violating such rights, although school districts accused of other types of discrimination face no such requirement. “Our actions today will protect the constitutional rights of students, teachers, and faith-based institutions,” Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos said in a statement. “The department’s efforts will level the playing field between religious and non-religious organizations competing for federal grants, as well as protect First Amendment freedoms on campus and the religious liberty of faith-based institutions.” Another change put in place Thursday is the lifting of an Obama-era executive order that mandated religious providers tell their beneficiaries about their right to see a secular provider. The Trump administration says this notice and referral requirement placed an undue burden on religious organizations.
— Source: Courthouse News
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-01-17--Partisan Press: Sen. McSally(R) And Rep. Omar(D) Both ‘Lashed Out’ At The SAME Reporter — Coverage W

Partisan Press: Sen. McSally(R) And Rep. Omar(D) Both ‘Lashed Out’ At The SAME Reporter — Coverage Was VERY Different

Can you believe that the Media ( D ) would treat two politicians completely differently simply because of their party affiliation ?
On Thursday morning , Manu Raju , CNN ’ s Senior Congressional Correspondent , caught up with Senator Martha McSally ( R-AZ ) in a hallway and asked if she would be willing to consider new evidence in the Senate impeachment trial .
McSally wasn ’ t having it .
She called Raju a “ liberal hack ” and refused to speak to him .
Reminder : Manu Raju contributed to the following articles at the height of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Media ( D ) converged to defend one of their own .
First up , CNN reporters jump to Raju ’ s defense .
Wolf Blitzer spoke to Raju about it on his show , The Situation Room : The rest of the leftwing Media ( D ) were quick to follow suit .
Seth Abramson of Newsweek implied that the comment meant that McSally is not the moderate that she was billed to be .
Speaking of the Washington Post , Greg Sargent , called the little altercation a “ vile @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it ’ s fitting that this episode is going viral at exactly the moment when President Trump ’ s impeachment trial is getting underway — that is , when Trump ’ s defenders in the Senate are set to put on a great show of pretending to give serious consideration to the case against Trump , before voting to acquit him .
McSally ’ s vile little performance puts the lie to that notion as effectively as anything possibly could .
What happened is that CNN ’ s Manu Raju , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether new information surfacing about the conduct for which Trump has been impeached should lead GOP senators to admit new evidence at his impeachment trial .
McSally snidely brushed off the question and called Raju a “ liberal hack.
” Raju then tweeted a neutral description of what had happened .
WaPo ’ s “ media watchdog ” Erik Wemple ( of Tucker Carlson ’ s Final Exam trophy mug fame ) claimed that McSally ’ s comments were “ chilling.
” MSNBC ’ s justice and security analyst called McSally a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the other Republicans .
Hillary-friendly NY Times journo , Maggie Haberman , pointed out that Trump-supporters loved it .
Haberman would also be one of those folks shouting “ Slay Queen !
” if it had been a Democrat calling Peter Doocy of Fox News a “ Faux News hack.
” Matthew Chapman of Raw Story is urging people to not vote for McSally .
Eric Boehlert whose Twitter bio reads , “ Author .
Daily Kos .
former staffer at Media Matters .
Salon , Rolling Stone and Billboard ” also suggests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being rude to a reporter .
CBS News reporter Melissa Quinn posted a card that has been given to Senators with some suggested phrases to help with pushy reporters .
As Mollie Hemmingway pointed out , Raju was the lead reporter in CNN ’ s “ Russian Collusion ” Fake News debacle by publishing a story stating that Don Jr. was sent an email on September 4 about a WikiLeaks document dump that was made public on September 13 , but CNN got the date wrong .
The email to Don Jr. was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after the WikiLeaks documents were made public .
Last year , Manu Raju was doing the same schtick , trying to get a comment from a member of Congress .
That time it was Rep. Ilhan Omar ( D-MN ) and she looked at him with incredulity and asked , “ What is wrong with you ?
” Weird , no Media ( D ) outrage for that one .
But those on the right have a very different take on the incident .
I don ’ t recall many of these journalists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I Thought She Was 18 ” Menendez ( D-NJ ) for his much worse behavior towards a Daily Caller reporter asking about the Green New Deal .
In case you missed that moment that got buried by the Media ( D ) gatekeepers , Sen. Menendez threatened to call the police on Henry Rodgers , a Daily Caller intern .
What ’ s this ?
Not one but two controversial Democrats treating the press badly and their comrades don ’ t come rushing to their defense ?
Don ’ t forget that a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Squad about the Antifa protester firebombing of an ICE facility in Washington and they were rather rude .
No one in the partisan press called them out for that .
But then , is anyone really surprised at any Media ( D ) bias anymore ?

Can you believe that the Media(D) would treat two politicians completely differently simply because of their party affiliation?
I’m not surprised, either.
On Thursday morning, Manu Raju, CNN’s Senior Congressional Correspondent, caught up with Senator Martha McSally(R-AZ) in a hallway and asked if she would be willing to consider new evidence in the Senate impeachment trial. McSally wasn’t having it. She called Raju a “liberal hack” and refused to speak to him.
Reminder: Manu Raju contributed to the following articles at the height of the “Russian Collusion” madness.
Sen. Martha McSally, a Republican facing a difficult election race, lashed out when I asked if she would consider new evidence as part of the Senate trial. “You’re a liberal hack – I’m not talking to you. You’re a liberal hack.” She then walked into a hearing room. — Manu Raju (@mkraju) January 16, 2020
Q: Senator McSally, should the Senate consider new evidence as part of the impeachment trial? McSally: You’re a liberal hack I’m not talking to you Manu- You’re not going to comment about this?
McSally: You're a liberal hack. pic.twitter.com/IW5pCfZ6Oa — Manu Raju (@mkraju) January 16, 2020
The Media(D) converged to defend one of their own.
First up, CNN reporters jump to Raju’s defense.
The question was perfectly reasonable and topical, politely asked, and Manu is respected on the Hill by Democrats and Republicans. https://t.co/efAawOfneO — Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) January 16, 2020
New statement from @CNNPR about McSally's comment to @mkraju: "It is extremely unbecoming for a U.S. Senator to sink to this level and treat a member of the press this way for simply doing his job." — Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) January 16, 2020
Am I only watching this who thought McSally sounded rehearsed in delivering this?https://t.co/y4D2RVmen6 — andrew kaczynski? (@KFILE) January 16, 2020
Remember when Martha McSally was hailed as a bipartisan hero when she curled up with her adorable golden retriever to concede in 2018? Now she is a snarling Trumpist. @manuraju is incredibly fair. She had no business insulting him that way. https://t.co/VA6undzbEK — Joan Walsh (@joanwalsh) January 16, 2020
One satisfying way to respond this McSally's desperate and unbecoming insults would be to donate to Mark Kelly's Senate campaign: https://t.co/5BVo4ojU2l https://t.co/49z6rhs4jc — Susan Hennessey (@Susan_Hennessey) January 16, 2020
Wolf Blitzer spoke to Raju about it on his show, The Situation Room:
The rest of the leftwing Media(D) were quick to follow suit.
Seth Abramson of Newsweek implied that the comment meant that McSally is not the moderate that she was billed to be.
Martha McSally, everyone: an endangered GOP "moderate" who is "persuadable" https://t.co/eGJqkNFyjO — Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) January 16, 2020
Speaking of the Washington Post, Greg Sargent, called the little altercation a “vile little performance.”
In a perverse way, it’s fitting that this episode is going viral at exactly the moment when President Trump’s impeachment trial is getting underway — that is, when Trump’s defenders in the Senate are set to put on a great show of pretending to give serious consideration to the case against Trump, before voting to acquit him. McSally’s vile little performance puts the lie to that notion as effectively as anything possibly could. What happened is that CNN’s Manu Raju, a hard-working reporter, dared to ask McSally whether new information surfacing about the conduct for which Trump has been impeached should lead GOP senators to admit new evidence at his impeachment trial. McSally snidely brushed off the question and called Raju a “liberal hack.” Raju then tweeted a neutral description of what had happened. Source: Washington Post
WaPo’s “media watchdog” Erik Wemple (of Tucker Carlson’s Final Exam trophy mug fame) claimed that McSally’s comments were “chilling.”
MSNBC’s justice and security analyst called McSally a “Trump clone” just like all of the other Republicans.
They are all Trump clones now. https://t.co/tuwxrAtpC4 — Matthew Miller (@matthewamiller) January 16, 2020
Hillary-friendly NY Times journo, Maggie Haberman, pointed out that Trump-supporters loved it.
And here is McSally’s reward,’for those wondering why she did it > https://t.co/t7SCaonHuJ — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) January 16, 2020
Haberman would also be one of those folks shouting “Slay Queen!” if it had been a Democrat calling Peter Doocy of Fox News a “Faux News hack.”
Matthew Chapman of Raw Story is urging people to not vote for McSally.
What an embarrassment for a United States Senator to behave this way. Arizona, you didn't vote for her before. Don't vote for her this time. Support @ShuttleCDRKelly. https://t.co/rsK8eEYeBz https://t.co/D46V2en2Fq — Matthew Chapman (@fawfulfan) January 16, 2020
Eric Boehlert whose Twitter bio reads, “Author. Daily Kos. former staffer at Media Matters. Salon, Rolling Stone and Billboard” also suggests that McSally deserves to be defeated for being rude to a reporter.
how many people in US history have only served as US Senator for 2 yrs? McSally's going to join that very small club https://t.co/Rcixa1sLyp — Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) January 16, 2020
Contrast Senator McSally’s shabby treatment of @mkraju versus how her late predecessor Senator McCain handled it pic.twitter.com/w3S3gWpFe5 — Alan He (@alanhe) January 16, 2020
CBS News reporter Melissa Quinn posted a card that has been given to Senators with some suggested phrases to help with pushy reporters.
Senators have been given a flashcard with suggested phrases to use to avoid reporters, per @caitlinconant and @Grace_Segers https://t.co/RVocWmrgq5 pic.twitter.com/1ANboUSVvB — Melissa Quinn (@MelissaQuinn97) January 16, 2020
As Mollie Hemmingway pointed out, Raju was the lead reporter in CNN’s “Russian Collusion” Fake News debacle by publishing a story stating that Don Jr. was sent an email on September 4 about a WikiLeaks document dump that was made public on September 13, but CNN got the date wrong. The email to Don Jr. was sent on September 14, the day after the WikiLeaks documents were made public.
Last year, Manu Raju was doing the same schtick, trying to get a comment from a member of Congress. That time it was Rep. Ilhan Omar(D-MN) and she looked at him with incredulity and asked, “What is wrong with you?”
Here's Ilhan Omar just last year "lashing out" at the same CNN reporter that Sen. McSally called a "liberal hack" this morning. Remember all the media outrage? Oh, that’s right. There was none. pic.twitter.com/GzZEEiPja2 — The First (@TheFirstonTV) January 16, 2020
Weird, no Media(D) outrage for that one.
But those on the right have a very different take on the incident.
I will say this about Manu: He's deserving of far more credit than McSally gives him here. I think ppl are overreacting about 'being attacked' or whatever, but Manu is one of the very rare journos who confronts Ilhan Omar, on camera, on the record–far more spine than most. — Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) January 16, 2020
To the liberals outraged that McSally would call a CNN reporter a "liberal hack," how would you react if Fox News sent a reporter to ask Ilhan Omar questions in the halls of Congress and she roasted them for being partisan? I bet you'd be screaming "SLAY QWEEN!" — Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) January 16, 2020
I don’t recall many of these journalists calling out Senator Bob “I Swear I Thought She Was 18” Menendez(D-NJ) for his much worse behavior towards a Daily Caller reporter asking about the Green New Deal. In case you missed that moment that got buried by the Media(D) gatekeepers, Sen. Menendez threatened to call the police on Henry Rodgers, a Daily Caller intern.
What’s this? Not one but two controversial Democrats treating the press badly and their comrades don’t come rushing to their defense?
Don’t forget that a Canadian reporter queried three members of the Squad about the Antifa protester firebombing of an ICE facility in Washington and they were rather rude. No one in the partisan press called them out for that.
But then, is anyone really surprised at any Media(D) bias anymore?


clashdaily--2020-01-17--HOT MIC: Post-Debate Comments Catch Exchange Between Bernie And Pinocchiohantas… Who’s Lying?

Not only did CNN moderators put their thumbs on the scale against Sanders DURING the debate ( again ) , but they published a post-debate ‘ confrontation ’ between Liz and Bernie .
Team Bernie Sanders is outraged , naturally .
Perhaps , after this , Bernie ’ s Iowa Campaign organizer Kyle Jurek will change which corporation ’ s News Studio employees he would like to burn alive .
They finally saw firsthand how CNN and the other Media ( D ) have Candidates like Warren ( D ) that they support , and will actively run interference to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the story here : Naturally , someone on the Interwebs has already turned that into a meme : # CNNisTrash Trends On Twitter As Debate Moderator Picks A Side In Bernie Vs. Warren Feud Right after the debate , Bernie offered Warren his hand for a handshake .
Instead of taking it , she started with an wounded bird routine — conveniently , right beside all those CNN microphones .
“ I think you called me a liar on National Television , ” she says .
Has it occurred to her that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to him ?
If so , irony tends to be lost on Democrats .
Especially Democrats with some kind of political gains to be had .
So , what do we have here , exactly ?
We have Bernie taking the high road , starting to make his case , but thinking better or it and not wanting to hash this out in public .
And we have Elizabeth Warren who begins by ignoring an outstretched hand , and accusing him of unfairly attacking a woman on national TV .
Don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t THAT many people watching it .
You are all as dull as dishwater .
More people have probably seen this clip than actually watched the debate itself live .
Who does Pinocciohontas ( full credit to Scott Adams for the nickname , btw ) really think she is fooling ?
She only tells the truth 1/1024 of the time .
What do YOU think ?
Who do you believe ?

Not only did CNN moderators put their thumbs on the scale against Sanders DURING the debate (again), but they published a post-debate ‘confrontation’ between Liz and Bernie.
Team Bernie Sanders is outraged, naturally. Perhaps, after this, Bernie’s Iowa Campaign organizer Kyle Jurek will change which corporation’s News Studio employees he would like to burn alive.
They finally saw firsthand how CNN and the other Media(D) have Candidates like Warren(D) that they support, and will actively run interference to help them. We covered THAT part of the story here:
Naturally, someone on the Interwebs has already turned that into a meme: #CNNisTrash Trends On Twitter As Debate Moderator Picks A Side In Bernie Vs. Warren Feud
But WAIT! There’s more!
Right after the debate, Bernie offered Warren his hand for a handshake. Instead of taking it, she started with an wounded bird routine — conveniently, right beside all those CNN microphones.
CNN releases the audio from the post debate interaction between Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren Warren: “I think you called me a liar on national TV” Sanders: “What?” Warren: “I think you called me a liar on national TV” Sanders: “No, let's not do it right now …” pic.twitter.com/nhendvv5Jb — Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) January 16, 2020
“I think you called me a liar on National Television,” she says.
Has it occurred to her that she is doing exactly the same thing to him? If so, irony tends to be lost on Democrats. Especially Democrats with some kind of political gains to be had.
So, what do we have here, exactly? We have Bernie taking the high road, starting to make his case, but thinking better or it and not wanting to hash this out in public. And we have Elizabeth Warren who begins by ignoring an outstretched hand, and accusing him of unfairly attacking a woman on national TV.
Don’t worry, Nancy, there weren’t THAT many people watching it. You are all as dull as dishwater. More people have probably seen this clip than actually watched the debate itself live.
But let’s step back.
Who does Pinocciohontas (full credit to Scott Adams for the nickname, btw) really think she is fooling? She only tells the truth 1/1024 of the time.
What do YOU think? Who do you believe?


clashdaily--2020-01-16--BOMBSHELL: Ilhan Omar Appears To Be Under Investigation By An Alphabet Soup Of Federal Agencies — In

BOMBSHELL: Ilhan Omar Appears To Be Under Investigation By An Alphabet Soup Of Federal Agencies — Including ICE

Things aren ’ t looking good for this member of “ The Squad.
” Investigative journalist , David Steinberg , who has been doing the heavy lifting digging into Rep. Ilhan Omar ( D-MN ) ’ s record and history dropped the big news in an article in The Blaze .
In October , Steinberg posted a thread on Twitter saying that he has given unpublished information that he has gathered on Omar to the FBI , which has launched an investigation .
Steinberg says that Minnesota State Rep. Steve Drazkowski ( R ) had previously filed a complaint with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stating that it appeared that Omar had committed multiple felonies between 2009-2017 .
The Minnesota DoJ — headed by U.S. Attorney Erica MacDonald , who was appointed by President Trump in 2018 –directed the FBI to investigate the matter .
It appears that the investigation has to do with what she calls the “ private ” matter of her marriage history , specifically relating to her second marriage in 2009 .
The Department of Justice has assigned an FBI Special Agent In Charge ( SAC ) to investigate why Ilhan Omar , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 12-year old refugee in 1995 , sponsored a British national in 2009 .
At the time , Ilhan Omar was 26 years old and had been a U.S. citizen for 9 years .
The British national was her second husband , Ahmed Nur Said Elmi , who appears to be her brother .
For more detailed background on Ilhan Omar ’ s convoluted marriage history , read this related ClashDaily article which includes a quick bullet-point summary .
MORE MARRIAGE DRAMA : Ilhan Omar Files For DIVORCE From Current Husband The “ private @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about to journalists seems to be at the heart of the investigation , specifically her second marriage to Elmi .
Steinberg then states that evidence points to a “ wide range of criminal activity ” which could involve other federal agencies .
The involvement of the DoE stems from evidence that appears to show that Omar attempted to commit federal student loan fraud or other fraud involving higher education .
In 2009 , Omar married Elmi , moved to North Dakota to attend university , Elmi enrolled the next year .
All the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with Omar ’ s first husband and her two children that she had with him .
Omar ’ s marriage to Elmi lasted only as long as she was enrolled in college .
Shortly after Omar ’ s 2009 marriage , the new couple moved to Fargo , North Dakota .
Omar enrolled at North Dakota State University in August 2009 .
Her husband enrolled the following year .
Omar received a degree in June 2011 .
According to Omar herself , she and her husband then permanently separated in June 2011 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ coincide with the start and end dates of Omar ’ s NDSU enrollment .
Incredibly — according to address records , and a statement from Omar herself — she was also still living with her first husband , and their two kids , throughout this second marriage .
In 2017 , Omar unilaterally filed for divorce from her estranged second husband claiming that she had lost all contact with him in 2011 .
She submitted a form under penalty of perjury .
It appears that she may have perjured herself eight times in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ points to Omar abusing immigration law to bring her brother to the United States for school while claiming he was her husband .
Under current immigration law , it is much easier to sponsor a spouse than a sibling .
This is incredibly inconvenient for Omar who has been very publicly condemning ICE along with her fellow “ Squad ” members .
Here at ClashDaily , we ’ ve thought that Omar was sketchy as hell for a long , long time .
That ’ s not because of her skin color , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she came to the U.S. as a refugee , that she ’ s from Somalia , is a homewrecker , or because she ’ s a woman , it ’ s because of what the Media ( D ) seems to skate over in their coverage .
There were red flags raised when Omar was a Minnesota state representative where she was found to have violated Minnesota ’ s campaign finance rules and it was largely ignored by the Media ( D ) likely because she is Muslim , an avowed leftist , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ D ) after her name .
Instead , the Partisan Presstitutes chose to stand by her and downplay her atrocious character by elevating her intersectional street cred .
With the FBI investigating Congresswoman Omar tying in the DoE and ICE , the Media ( D ) won ’ t be able to ignore it for long .
• 5 DAMNING Facts About Rep. Ilhan Omar That The Media ( D ) Has Ignored • Ilhan Omar : Here ’ s Yet ANOTHER 6-Figure Allegation Of Campaign Finance Fraud • Corroboration : 2nd Witness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Qatar & Iran • WATCH : Ilhan Omar Tries To Explain The Difference Between Iranian Sanctions And The BDS Movement • Should Ilhan Omar ’ s Support For This Terrorist Organization Disqualify Her From Committee Work ?
• WATCH : Rep. Omar And Rep. Tlaib Hold Presser FILLED With Anti-Israel Lies — Here ’ s The 411

Things aren’t looking good for this member of “The Squad.”
Investigative journalist, David Steinberg, who has been doing the heavy lifting digging into Rep. Ilhan Omar(D-MN)’s record and history dropped the big news in an article in The Blaze.
Here’s a little background…
In October, Steinberg posted a thread on Twitter saying that he has given unpublished information that he has gathered on Omar to the FBI, which has launched an investigation.
BIG Ilhan Omar update: I know you are disgusted by @IlhanMN’s lawless behavior lately, and her anti-Semitic demand we only sanction Israel, not Turkey and Iran. So here's some good news. Several weeks ago, I gave pivotal, never-published info on @IlhanMN to the FBI. (1/x) — David Steinberg (@realDSteinberg) October 30, 2019
If a federal investigation is opened based upon this meeting, I believe the never-published information I shared should quickly lead the FBI to conclusive evidence that @IlhanMN committed numerous felonies between 2009-2017. (3/x) — David Steinberg (@realDSteinberg) October 30, 2019
I’m finally hopeful that, for once, a notable Democrat will be subject to the rule of law. Let’s see what happens. One more thing: I’ve often said that the 3-year @IlhanMN national disgrace only happened because MSM such as @StarTribune chose to lie to you. (5/x) — David Steinberg (@realDSteinberg) October 30, 2019
Steinberg says that Minnesota State Rep. Steve Drazkowski(R) had previously filed a complaint with Minnesota District of the Department of Justice stating that it appeared that Omar had committed multiple felonies between 2009-2017. The Minnesota DoJ — headed by U.S. Attorney Erica MacDonald, who was appointed by President Trump in 2018 –directed the FBI to investigate the matter.
It appears that the investigation has to do with what she calls the “private” matter of her marriage history, specifically relating to her second marriage in 2009.
The Department of Justice has assigned an FBI Special Agent In Charge (SAC) to investigate why Ilhan Omar, who came to the United States as a 12-year old refugee in 1995, sponsored a British national in 2009. At the time, Ilhan Omar was 26 years old and had been a U.S. citizen for 9 years. The British national was her second husband, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, who appears to be her brother.
For more detailed background on Ilhan Omar’s convoluted marriage history, read this related ClashDaily article which includes a quick bullet-point summary.
MORE MARRIAGE DRAMA: Ilhan Omar Files For DIVORCE From Current Husband
The “private matter” that Omar refuses to speak about to journalists seems to be at the heart of the investigation, specifically her second marriage to Elmi.
Steinberg then states that evidence points to a “wide range of criminal activity” which could involve other federal agencies.
In October, the FBI SAC stated that the wide range of criminal activity suggested by the evidence against Rep. Omar may lead the FBI to expand the review to other federal departments. In such situations, the SAC continued, the FBI often acts as a hub — sharing evidence, or coordinating a joint investigation, with several other investigative agencies. Indeed, this has since occurred. Source: The Blaze
Department of Education Inspector General
The involvement of the DoE stems from evidence that appears to show that Omar attempted to commit federal student loan fraud or other fraud involving higher education. In 2009, Omar married Elmi, moved to North Dakota to attend university, Elmi enrolled the next year. All the while, Omar and Elmi were living with Omar’s first husband and her two children that she had with him. Omar’s marriage to Elmi lasted only as long as she was enrolled in college.
Shortly after Omar’s 2009 marriage, the new couple moved to Fargo, North Dakota. Omar enrolled at North Dakota State University in August 2009. Her husband enrolled the following year. Omar received a degree in June 2011. According to Omar herself, she and her husband then permanently separated in June 2011. The marriage’s start and end coincide with the start and end dates of Omar’s NDSU enrollment. Incredibly — according to address records, and a statement from Omar herself — she was also still living with her first husband, and their two kids, throughout this second marriage. Source: The Blaze
In 2017, Omar unilaterally filed for divorce from her estranged second husband claiming that she had lost all contact with him in 2011. She submitted a form under penalty of perjury. It appears that she may have perjured herself eight times in the nine question document.
Click here for what sure appears to be smoking-gun evidence. The only man on Earth with the same name and birthdate as Omar’s ex-husband — appears to have been raised in the London home of Ilhan’s verifiable sister. And has the same three family names. Source: The Blaze
2. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
The evidence points to Omar abusing immigration law to bring her brother to the United States for school while claiming he was her husband. Under current immigration law, it is much easier to sponsor a spouse than a sibling.
The answers to those questions about 2009 appear to give probable cause to investigate Omar for eight instances of perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, up to eight years of state and federal tax fraud, two years of federal student loan fraud, and even bigamy. To be clear: The facts describe perhaps the most extensive spree of illegal misconduct committed by a House member in American history. Source: Powerline Blog
This is incredibly inconvenient for Omar who has been very publicly condemning ICE along with her fellow “Squad” members.
For several years, Omar has vigorously supported the abolishmentof ICE. Her 2020 re-election platform — featured on her campaign site, and pictured below — targets ICE agents with vicious rhetoric that simply must be read by interested parties. States Omar’s site: “Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is an unreformable organization that has become increasingly militarized, brutal, and unaccountable.” Source: The Blaze
Here at ClashDaily, we’ve thought that Omar was sketchy as hell for a long, long time. That’s not because of her skin color, her turban, her religion, that she came to the U.S. as a refugee, that she’s from Somalia, is a homewrecker, or because she’s a woman, it’s because of what the Media(D) seems to skate over in their coverage.
There were red flags raised when Omar was a Minnesota state representative where she was found to have violated Minnesota’s campaign finance rules and it was largely ignored by the Media(D) likely because she is Muslim, an avowed leftist, and a hijab-wearing woman with a (D) after her name. Instead, the Partisan Presstitutes chose to stand by her and downplay her atrocious character by elevating her intersectional street cred.
With the FBI investigating Congresswoman Omar tying in the DoE and ICE, the Media(D) won’t be able to ignore it for long.
Related:


clashdaily--2020-01-16--SO IT BEGINS: Opening Day On The SENATE Side Of Impeachment — Here’s The 411

Pelosi is no longer running the show .
She has passed off to the Senate where Shifty will lead the prosecution , and he will be on a shorter leash than he was in Nancy ’ s Democrat-controlled House .
With his accustomed theatrics , Adam Schiff ( D ) entered the well of the Senate and presented the articles against the President .
And the Media ( D ) can be expected to serve as his willing accomplices .
Shifty fails to mention WHY the White House would object to witnesses appearing before him… namely the fact that Shifty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in attendance and object to said witnesses to answering anything that might violate legitimate privilege in EXACTLY the same manner that Shifty himself silenced witnesses when questions veered too close to exposing the Whistleblower whose identity the Google-eyed Pencilneck claimed not to know .
This is EXACTLY the sort of question that could have been resolved by an appeal to the courts .
But they WANTED to have bogus ‘ Obstruction of Congress ’ charges to wave against the President because they could be dressed up as the completely unrelated ‘ Obstruction of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Trump ’ s feet .
Because what this is REALLY about came out of the mouth of Pelosi herself .
They WANT a ‘ stain ’ on his Presidency since they can not BEGIN to compare with the crowds he is pulling in , and fear losing yet another election .
The next step was the Chief Justice arriving , taking his place and being sworn in .
After that , he led Congress in taking their oaths , followed by the signing of the oath book .
McConnell stood up , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sent an official summons to the President before adjourning .
Contrast all of what Schiff and the Democrats have been saying to what Ted Cruz had to say on his way to the Senate .
Buckle up everyone , it ’ s just getting started .

Pelosi is no longer running the show. She has passed off to the Senate where Shifty will lead the prosecution, and he will be on a shorter leash than he was in Nancy’s Democrat-controlled House.
With his accustomed theatrics, Adam Schiff(D) entered the well of the Senate and presented the articles against the President. And the Media(D) can be expected to serve as his willing accomplices.
For example…
"Donald J. Trump has abused the power of the presidency." Lead House impeachment manager Adam Schiff reads the articles of impeachment on the Senate floor, charging President Trump with "high crimes and misdemeanors." https://t.co/JfLWh2ZXgd pic.twitter.com/4tU646i1Al — World News Tonight (@ABCWorldNews) January 16, 2020
Shifty fails to mention WHY the White House would object to witnesses appearing before him… namely the fact that Shifty had forbidden White House counsel to be in attendance and object to said witnesses to answering anything that might violate legitimate privilege in EXACTLY the same manner that Shifty himself silenced witnesses when questions veered too close to exposing the Whistleblower whose identity the Google-eyed Pencilneck claimed not to know. This is EXACTLY the sort of question that could have been resolved by an appeal to the courts. But they WANTED to have bogus ‘Obstruction of Congress’ charges to wave against the President because they could be dressed up as the completely unrelated ‘Obstruction of Justice’ charges they WANT to lay at Trump’s feet.
Because what this is REALLY about came out of the mouth of Pelosi herself. They WANT a ‘stain’ on his Presidency since they cannot BEGIN to compare with the crowds he is pulling in, and fear losing yet another election.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: "The president is not above the law. He will be held accountable. He has been held accountable. He has been impeached. He has been impeached forever. They can never erase that." pic.twitter.com/DeU61R0iAM — Alex Salvi (@alexsalvinews) January 16, 2020
The next step was the Chief Justice arriving, taking his place and being sworn in.
Chief Justice John Roberts is sworn in by Senate pro tempore Chuck Grassley to preside over the historic Senate impeachment trial. https://t.co/NQbeUdSaZO pic.twitter.com/tGmDuwvDgX — ABC News (@ABC) January 16, 2020
After that, he led Congress in taking their oaths, followed by the signing of the oath book.
BREAKING: Chief Justice John Roberts: "Do you solemnly wear that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment of Donald John Trump…you will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws, so help you God?" Senators: "I do." https://t.co/2Eyoi17Rku pic.twitter.com/MVzQpDV2xs — ABC News (@ABC) January 16, 2020
McConnell stood up, did some of the housekeeping, and sent an official summons to the President before adjourning.
Contrast all of what Schiff and the Democrats have been saying to what Ted Cruz had to say on his way to the Senate.
Zodiac killer is ready to deadass murder Impeachment @tedcruz pic.twitter.com/6qni16oMr7 — Benny (@bennyjohnson) January 16, 2020
Buckle up everyone, it’s just getting started.


clashdaily--2020-01-16--Sorry, Feminists: Bond Producer Says, ‘He Can Be Of Any Color, But He Is Male’

Good news , Bond fans !
The wokescolds aren ’ t going to ruin the main character anytime soon .
The question remains if the character itself can remain faithful to Ian Fleming ’ s creation as the badass , womanizing spy in the # MeToo era .
Variety published a rare , lengthy interview with the “ gatekeepers ” of the Bond franchise , and they discussed what future Bond movies would look like .
Barbara Broccoli and her half-brother Michael G. Wilson are the final say on the future of the Bond franchise .
“ For better or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this character , ” says Barbara Broccoli , who oversees the franchise with her half-brother Michael G. Wilson .
“ We take that responsibility seriously.
” It ’ s an arrangement that was first hammered out by Broccoli ’ s father , the producer Albert “ Cubby ” Broccoli , when John F. Kennedy was president and the Twist was all the rage .
Miraculously , that pact has prevailed through the decades and generations , enduring everything from corporate mergers and bankruptcies to shifting consumer tastes and geopolitical upheavals .
The elder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ceding control to his two children with the 1995 release of “ GoldenEye , ” a film that proved a sexist superspy , conceived by novelist Ian Fleming in the 1950s , still had a role to play in post-Cold War cinema .
In the interview , Broccoli spoke about the pretty clear vision of the types of changes to the character would and would not be acceptable .
She says that although she is open to a non-white actor portraying the iconic character , a woman is right out .
Broccoli prefers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than taking an existing male character and cast a woman in that role .
A woman simply would not behave the same way that James Bond does .
Although , it ’ s clear that a female secret agent could be very compelling in her own right .
There are certain things the duo appears open to considering , and other conversations that are nonstarters , when it comes to selecting the next Bond .
“ He can be of any color , but he is male , ” says Broccoli .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ characters for women — strong female characters .
I ’ m not particularly interested in taking a male character and having a woman play it .
I think women are far more interesting than that.
” Source : Variety This is very good news for the fans that have been begging for years for Idris Elba to be the new Bond .
Yeah , I can absolutely see that happening .
Elba would make a fantastic James Bond .

Good news, Bond fans! The wokescolds aren’t going to ruin the main character anytime soon.
The question remains if the character itself can remain faithful to Ian Fleming’s creation as the badass, womanizing spy in the #MeToo era.
Variety published a rare, lengthy interview with the “gatekeepers” of the Bond franchise, and they discussed what future Bond movies would look like.
Barbara Broccoli and her half-brother Michael G. Wilson are the final say on the future of the Bond franchise.
“For better or worse, we are the custodians of this character,” says Barbara Broccoli, who oversees the franchise with her half-brother Michael G. Wilson. “We take that responsibility seriously.” It’s an arrangement that was first hammered out by Broccoli’s father, the producer Albert “Cubby” Broccoli, when John F. Kennedy was president and the Twist was all the rage. Miraculously, that pact has prevailed through the decades and generations, enduring everything from corporate mergers and bankruptcies to shifting consumer tastes and geopolitical upheavals. The elder Broccoli died in 1996. but not before ceding control to his two children with the 1995 release of “GoldenEye,” a film that proved a sexist superspy, conceived by novelist Ian Fleming in the 1950s, still had a role to play in post-Cold War cinema.
In the interview, Broccoli spoke about the pretty clear vision of the types of changes to the character would and would not be acceptable. She says that although she is open to a non-white actor portraying the iconic character, a woman is right out. Broccoli prefers creating new strong characters for women rather than taking an existing male character and cast a woman in that role.
A woman simply would not behave the same way that James Bond does. Although, it’s clear that a female secret agent could be very compelling in her own right.
There are certain things the duo appears open to considering, and other conversations that are nonstarters, when it comes to selecting the next Bond. “He can be of any color, but he is male,” says Broccoli. “I believe we should be creating new characters for women — strong female characters. I’m not particularly interested in taking a male character and having a woman play it. I think women are far more interesting than that.”
Source: Variety
This is very good news for the fans that have been begging for years for Idris Elba to be the new Bond.
Yeah, I can absolutely see that happening. Elba would make a fantastic James Bond.


clashdaily--2020-01-16--WATCH: Pompous Pelosi’s Impeachment Ceremonies Backfire Badly

Is THIS the mark she was really hoping to leave on history ?
Was her goal to be a laughingstock ?
The day has finally come .
Nancy Pelosi finally decided to kick the impeachment fiasco up to the Senate .
And just like the rest of this embarrassing display , she managed to turn the ‘ solemn ’ and ‘ prayerful ’ process into a clown show .
First , there were special gold-plated commemorative pens with Pelosi ’ s name on them .
( Some have speculated that the real reason she was delaying so long was because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yet . )
Then there was the signing process itself , in which Pelosi signed with something like seventeen different pens , so she could give a souvenir and pose for a photo with each recipient .
Because nothing says ‘ somber ’ and ‘ respect for the process ’ like photos and souvenirs .
There was the choreographed march to give notice to the Senate that they would be delivering articles of impeachment the following day .
That got them dragged , too .
Everything from observers describing it as a ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or the funeral march of the Democratic party to , well , this : This editor can ’ t help but feel bad for the chick holding the silver tray while doing an awkward pseudo-solemn penguin walk .
So many memes will be born out of this .
All of that almost seemed sane in comparison to the rambling nonsensical speech she gave us .
Now This , a leftist site put the video up where she goes into her customary bizarre ramblings .
You almost feel sorry for her .
We ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with a less than stellar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

Is THIS the mark she was really hoping to leave on history? Was her goal to be a laughingstock?
The day has finally come. Nancy Pelosi finally decided to kick the impeachment fiasco up to the Senate. And just like the rest of this embarrassing display, she managed to turn the ‘solemn’ and ‘prayerful’ process into a clown show.
First, there were special gold-plated commemorative pens with Pelosi’s name on them. (Some have speculated that the real reason she was delaying so long was because her special pens hadn’t arrived yet.)
When you’re sad and somber about impeachment, you make commemorative pens to sign the articles of impeachment with your name on them to hand out as keepsakes and fundraisers. #prayerful #somber pic.twitter.com/aSTqVbahYo — Chris Stigall (@ChrisStigall) January 16, 2020
Then there was the signing process itself, in which Pelosi signed with something like seventeen different pens, so she could give a souvenir and pose for a photo with each recipient. Because nothing says ‘somber’ and ‘respect for the process’ like photos and souvenirs.
McConnell on Pelosi's impeachment pens: "Nothing says seriousness and sobriety like handing out souvenirs. As though this were a happy bill-signing instead of the gravest process in our Constitution." — Doug Andres (@DougAndres) January 16, 2020
The face of "no joy" and so much "somber" pic.twitter.com/0oFPL6DuHi — Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) January 15, 2020
There was the choreographed march to give notice to the Senate that they would be delivering articles of impeachment the following day. That got them dragged, too. Everything from observers describing it as a ‘royal wedding without a nice dress’ or the funeral march of the Democratic party to, well, this:
That Hill show has always been my favorite comedy. Sound on? (Credit goes to PBS for video.) pic.twitter.com/JlmDtIedJH — Breitbear News Network (@BearUKnow) January 16, 2020
This editor can’t help but feel bad for the chick holding the silver tray while doing an awkward pseudo-solemn penguin walk. So many memes will be born out of this.
(Update: Found another one that we just had to include)
I had to do it pic.twitter.com/Mi4eJdkYkm — Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) January 15, 2020
All of that almost seemed sane in comparison to the rambling nonsensical speech she gave us.
Now This, a leftist site put the video up where she goes into her customary bizarre ramblings.
You almost feel sorry for her.
Almost.
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-01-16--Why Are Some ‘Christians’ Opposing Kanye’s Ministry?

Kanye West is shaking things up in the name of Christ .
So why are some Christians so quick to @ @ @ @ @ doing ?
They are just waiting for him to pull a bait and switch .
@ @ @ @ @ theological failing .
Or to wind up in a scandal .
People who are quick @ @ @ @ @ scandals and moral implosions of leaders in their own denominations under the rug are popping @ @ @ @ @ Kanye to fall off a cliff .
Maybe they should flip through the book of @ @ @ @ @ gospels .
Or today ’ s show where we take on that topic head-on .
@ @ @ @ @ ?
We ’ ve got that too : Roku — FireTV — AndroidTV ) Or @ @ @ @ @ Don ’ t miss the next one !
Subscribe for the podcast on your favorite @ @

Kanye West is shaking things up in the name of Christ. So why are some Christians so quick to judge what he’s doing?
They are just waiting for him to pull a bait and switch. Or to have some serious theological failing. Or to wind up in a scandal.
People who are quick to sweep the sins, scandals and moral implosions of leaders in their own denominations under the rug are popping the popcorn and waiting for Kanye to fall off a cliff.
Maybe they should flip through the book of Jonah again. Or the gospels.
Or today’s show where we take on that topic head-on.
Prefer to stream the video? We’ve got that too: Roku — FireTV — AndroidTV)
Or go with our audio format…
Don’t miss the next one! Subscribe for the podcast on your favorite platform:
Apple Podcasts
Google Play Music
Spotify
Soundcloud
Stitcher
Get Doug Giles’ new book:


clashdaily--2020-01-16--‘Progressive’ Transgender Doll With Pigtails And A Johnson Sparks Outrage

In what possible nightmare world is it important for children ’ s dolls to be anatomically correct ?
Or weirder still , to make a ‘ statement ’ on gender norms ?
Whatever happened to letting kids be kids ?
You know , letting a doll ’ s ‘ naughty bits ’ be left blank because really , kids haven ’ t developed to the point where they ’ ve got any awareness of what those parts are for , seeing as they are , you know , KIDS and all .
But NO .
For some reason , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just play pretend with toys that leave private parts blank .
Someone went ahead and made what looks like a baby ‘ Jessica Yaniv ’ doll .
As far as we know , it ’ s the world ’ s first transgender doll .
A transgender children ’ s doll – believed to be the world ’ s first – has gone on sale in Russia .
The doll – pictured with a penis and wearing a dress – sparked debate after being spotted in a Siberian toyshop .
Pictures of the doll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Toys ) shop in the city of Novosibirsk went viral after being posted online .
The images show the doll with long blonde hair and an apparently female face .
It is shown wearing a red dress with what appears to be male genitalia underneath Source : Daily Star Look Who ’ s Back : ‘ Wax My Balls ’ Activist Punches Out Reporter ( Video )

In what possible nightmare world is it important for children’s dolls to be anatomically correct? Or weirder still, to make a ‘statement’ on gender norms?
Whatever happened to letting kids be kids?
You know, letting a doll’s ‘naughty bits’ be left blank because really, kids haven’t developed to the point where they’ve got any awareness of what those parts are for, seeing as they are, you know, KIDS and all.
But NO. For some reason, it’s not enough for kids to just play pretend with toys that leave private parts blank.
Someone went ahead and made what looks like a baby ‘Jessica Yaniv’ doll.
As far as we know, it’s the world’s first transgender doll.
A transgender children’s doll – believed to be the world’s first – has gone on sale in Russia . The doll – pictured with a penis and wearing a dress – sparked debate after being spotted in a Siberian toyshop. Pictures of the doll at the Planeta Igrushek (Planet Of Toys) shop in the city of Novosibirsk went viral after being posted online. The images show the doll with long blonde hair and an apparently female face. It is shown wearing a red dress with what appears to be male genitalia underneath
Source: Daily Star
Related…
Look Who’s Back: ‘Wax My Balls’ Activist Punches Out Reporter (Video)


clashdaily--2020-01-16--Pastor, We Have to Talk About Our Family

A murderer walked into a Texas church .
That was neither the first time , nor will it be the last time that evil men and women want to kill our brothers and sisters at church .
Unfortunately , the leaders of our religious bodies are reluctant to face the issue of church security .
That is true in every faith I ’ ve examined .
Your pastor , minister , priest or rabbi all face a common problem .
We live in a time of religious competition where parishioners will go somewhere else if the pastor demands too much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think of a pastor as a spiritual workout-coach… and we are lazy parishioners .
If the congregation is still sore at the pastor by Wednesday , then we won ’ t come back for more next week .
That explains why so many pastors refuse to examine church security .
Here is how we can help good men and women see the light .
Look at the problem from both sides of the pulpit .
The congregation wants to ignore the problem of evil .
Most of the congregation chooses to be defenseless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them bother to protect their family at home .
Most of the congregation is immediately uncomfortable if you point out their vulnerability .
They want to close their eyes and sing louder so they don ’ t have to address their responsibility to protect the congregation .
We see a similar situation with the pastor and the church governing board .
Most of them are men and women of words , not actions .
They talk about evil , but few of them wrestle with evil every day .
In some congregations , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the garden equipment , but will leave the doors of the church open and unguarded when the congregation is inside .
That says a lot about what they value .
We can ’ t blame them .
Most pastors and church governing boards don ’ t know the questions to ask in order to think about church security .
• People come with problems .
Parishioners are preyed upon by both criminals and crazy people .
Churches are attacked by their members and by people outside the congregation .
There are no safe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more dangerous than our schools .
• The congregation is vulnerable everywhere .
We see parishioners and staff victimized in the church parking lot , the daycare facility , the classrooms , kitchens , back offices , and in the chapel .
Protecting the flock at all times and places is a very demanding task .
It is beyond the ability of most congregations .
If we can ’ t protect them , then we should let the congregation protect themselves .
That brings us to the meeting .
Those who choose to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being defenseless in church .
They are in the majority and their point of view will win unless someone else speaks up .
Fortunately , there are other points of view .
Each of us is a gift from God and each of us deserves protection .
Each of us is also called upon to be a shepherd .
We should protect ourselves , protect our family , and protect our neighbors from harm .
Love is more than what you feel and what you say .
Love is what you do .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ stop the rain and give us heat and light .
Instead , we build a church .
God also gave us the will and the means to protect each other , and we should .
If your congregation doesn ’ t love you and your family enough to protect them , then you need to find a congregation that puts their words into action .
Church security is largely unseen and therefore easily forgotten .
You ’ ve probably been in churches that had an extensive security effort .
You were busy listening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t notice.. and that is a good thing .
Just because you don ’ t notice church security doesn ’ t mean it isn ’ t there and isn ’ t important .
Ask your pastor and church governing board a few simple questions .
You deserve an answer .
Do we have a security plan ?
Are we protecting everyone on church property ?
Our churches have a lot to do .
We can ’ t blame them for not solving problems they don ’ t understand .
Help starts with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gave you 700 words , but I had a lot of help .
Sources- The Faith Based Security Network Book- “ Evil Invades Sanctuary ” Book- “ A Time to Kill : The Bible and Self-Defense ” Book- “ Faith and the Patriot : A Belief Worth Fighting For ”

A murderer walked into a Texas church. That was neither the first time, nor will it be the last time that evil men and women want to kill our brothers and sisters at church. Unfortunately, the leaders of our religious bodies are reluctant to face the issue of church security. That is true in every faith I’ve examined. Your pastor, minister, priest or rabbi all face a common problem. We live in a time of religious competition where parishioners will go somewhere else if the pastor demands too much them. To understand their position, think of a pastor as a spiritual workout-coach… and we are lazy parishioners. If the congregation is still sore at the pastor by Wednesday, then we won’t come back for more next week. That explains why so many pastors refuse to examine church security. Here is how we can help good men and women see the light.
Look at the problem from both sides of the pulpit. The congregation wants to ignore the problem of evil. Most of the congregation chooses to be defenseless in public. Only a few of them bother to protect their family at home. Most of the congregation is immediately uncomfortable if you point out their vulnerability. They want to close their eyes and sing louder so they don’t have to address their responsibility to protect the congregation.
We see a similar situation with the pastor and the church governing board. Most of them are men and women of words, not actions. They talk about evil, but few of them wrestle with evil every day. In some congregations, they will lock the shed that holds the garden equipment, but will leave the doors of the church open and unguarded when the congregation is inside. That says a lot about what they value.
We can’t blame them. Most pastors and church governing boards don’t know the questions to ask in order to think about church security.
People come with problems. Parishioners are preyed upon by both criminals and crazy people. Churches are attacked by their members and by people outside the congregation. There are no safe and sacred places; our churches are more dangerous than our schools.
The congregation is vulnerable everywhere. We see parishioners and staff victimized in the church parking lot, the daycare facility, the classrooms, kitchens, back offices, and in the chapel.
Protecting the flock at all times and places is a very demanding task. It is beyond the ability of most congregations. If we can’t protect them, then we should let the congregation protect themselves. That brings us to the meeting.
Those who choose to be defenseless in public usually advocate for being defenseless in church. They are in the majority and their point of view will win unless someone else speaks up. Fortunately, there are other points of view.
Each of us is a gift from God and each of us deserves protection. Each of us is also called upon to be a shepherd. We should protect ourselves, protect our family, and protect our neighbors from harm. Love is more than what you feel and what you say. Love is what you do.
We don’t tell God to stop the rain and give us heat and light. Instead, we build a church. God also gave us the will and the means to protect each other, and we should. If your congregation doesn’t love you and your family enough to protect them, then you need to find a congregation that puts their words into action.
Church security is largely unseen and therefore easily forgotten. You’ve probably been in churches that had an extensive security effort. You were busy listening to the sermon, so you didn’t notice.. and that is a good thing. Just because you don’t notice church security doesn’t mean it isn’t there and isn’t important.
Ask your pastor and church governing board a few simple questions. You deserve an answer.
Do we have a security plan?
Are we protecting everyone on church property?
Our churches have a lot to do. We can’t blame them for not solving problems they don’t understand. Help starts with you asking a simple question.
~_~_
I gave you 700 words, but I had a lot of help.
Sources-
The Faith Based Security Network
Book- “Evil Invades Sanctuary”
Book- “A Time to Kill: The Bible and Self-Defense”
Book- “Faith and the Patriot: A Belief Worth Fighting For”


clashdaily--2020-01-16--A Glorious Weekend Filming With Fellow Deplorables In California

Hello America .
I am black conservative Christian singer/songwriter Lloyd Marcus .
I just returned home to West Virginia from a wonderful weekend with fellow Trump supporters in California , filming the music video for my Trump Train 2020 song .
Singers who sang on the recording of the song accompanied my wife Mary and I to California to appear in the music video .
Excited local California Trump supporters joined us at Studio One sound stage to perform in the music video .
Even though we east and west coast Trump supporters were meeting for the first time , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ electric , feeling like a joyous family reunion .
Everyone relished in the opportunity to fellowship with others who love America ; freely expressing their Christianity , conservative values and support for our president who boldly places America first .
We were united as brothers and sisters in our mission to “ Keep America Great ” by securing the reelection of our remarkable president .
The brilliant conservative director of the Trump Train 2020 song music video is Robert Kirk .
His political comedy , “ Alien Anthropologists ” has won various prestigious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Alien Anthropologists ” movie website .
Robert treated me to a sneak-peek of his hilarious new short film titled , “ Nightmare in Paradise.
” It ’ s about an emigre from Kansas who has a nightmare about trying to run a business in California .
Things go from bad to worse when a Wazeri Immigrant Transgender cross-dresser shows up for a job interview .
The situational humor is based on actual California law .
Robert ’ s humor is an entertaining component of the Trump Train 2020 song music video .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ truth .
It is refreshing that members of Robert ’ s film crew are conservatives who support Trump .
Yes , there are entertainment industry professionals in California who love America .
Sunday , before heading to the airport for our return trip home , we had dinner in the restaurant of the historic beautiful Hotel del Coronado where the movie “ Some Like It Hot ” was filmed in 1958 .
Our drinks were served with paper straws which began falling apart in a short amount of time .
My sister , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ song , came to California with us .
I explained to her that California is in the process of banning plastic straws to save the environment .
And yet , diseases we have not seen in decades are resurfacing because California allows people to poop on the streets .
Vagrants defecating on the streets has become so pervasive that poop maps are distributed to help tourists avoid piles of human excrement .
My sister could hardly believe her ears .
Fake news media has insidiously hid this disgusting truth and other policies which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ controlled by socialist Democrats .
A victim of fake news media , my sister was unaware of all the gender insanity going on in our country .
She said during a doctor visit in Maryland , she was stunned by the numerous gender options she was given on the medical form .
“ Zero ” was one of the absurd gender options .
Upon returning the van to the airport rental center , we laughed at a restroom sign .
The sign featured three graphic silhouettes ; a male , a female and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ read , “ ALL GENDER RESTROOM .
Anyone can use this restroom , regardless of gender identity or expression.
” The sign was a prime example of the craziness Democrats are cramming down the throats of mainstream Americans under the pretense of compassion and inclusion .
Fourteen-year-old Nicholas sang on the Trump Train 2020 song .
His mom entrusted me to bring him to California with us to appear in the music video .
Nicholas is homeschooled .
Folks , this kid is awesome ; bright , extremely knowledgeable and well-poised .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have noticed the same outstanding traits in homeschooled children .
Democrats hate and are aggressively scheming to ban homeschooling .
They demand total access to the hearts and minds of our kids to transform them into anti-Christian , anti-American and socialist social-justice-warriors .
Due to Democrat control of public education , kids are infected with LGBTQ propaganda beginning with preschoolers .
The Trump Train 2020 song music video will debut early February .
Enjoy these photos of filming the music video .

Hello America. I am black conservative Christian singer/songwriter Lloyd Marcus. I just returned home to West Virginia from a wonderful weekend with fellow Trump supporters in California, filming the music video for my Trump Train 2020 song.
Singers who sang on the recording of the song accompanied my wife Mary and I to California to appear in the music video. Excited local California Trump supporters joined us at Studio One sound stage to perform in the music video.
Even though we east and west coast Trump supporters were meeting for the first time, the atmosphere of the video shoot was electric, feeling like a joyous family reunion. Everyone relished in the opportunity to fellowship with others who love America; freely expressing their Christianity, conservative values and support for our president who boldly places America first. We were united as brothers and sisters in our mission to “Keep America Great” by securing the reelection of our remarkable president.
The brilliant conservative director of the Trump Train 2020 song music video is Robert Kirk. His political comedy, “Alien Anthropologists” has won various prestigious film festival awards. Please visit the “Alien Anthropologists” movie website.
Robert treated me to a sneak-peek of his hilarious new short film titled, “Nightmare in Paradise.”It’s about an emigre from Kansas who has a nightmare about trying to run a business in California. Things go from bad to worse when a Wazeri Immigrant Transgender cross-dresser shows up for a job interview. The situational humor is based on actual California law.
Robert’s humor is an entertaining component of the Trump Train 2020 song music video. Humor is an excellent vehicle to spread truth. It is refreshing that members of Robert’s film crew are conservatives who support Trump. Yes, there are entertainment industry professionals in California who love America.
Sunday, before heading to the airport for our return trip home, we had dinner in the restaurant of the historic beautiful Hotel del Coronado where the movie “Some Like It Hot” was filmed in 1958. Our drinks were served with paper straws which began falling apart in a short amount of time. My sister, who sang on the Trump Train 2020 song, came to California with us. I explained to her that California is in the process of banning plastic straws to save the environment. And yet, diseases we have not seen in decades are resurfacing because California allows people to poop on the streets. Vagrants defecating on the streets has become so pervasive that poop maps are distributed to help tourists avoid piles of human excrement. My sister could hardly believe her ears. Fake news media has insidiously hid this disgusting truth and other policies which cause law-abiding taxpayers to suffer in cities controlled by socialist Democrats.
A victim of fake news media, my sister was unaware of all the gender insanity going on in our country. She said during a doctor visit in Maryland, she was stunned by the numerous gender options she was given on the medical form. “Zero” was one of the absurd gender options.
Upon returning the van to the airport rental center, we laughed at a restroom sign. The sign featured three graphic silhouettes; a male, a female and one half and half. The text read, “ALL GENDER RESTROOM. Anyone can use this restroom, regardless of gender identity or expression.” The sign was a prime example of the craziness Democrats are cramming down the throats of mainstream Americans under the pretense of compassion and inclusion.
Fourteen-year-old Nicholas sang on the Trump Train 2020 song. His mom entrusted me to bring him to California with us to appear in the music video. Nicholas is homeschooled. Folks, this kid is awesome; bright, extremely knowledgeable and well-poised.
In my travels around the country, I have noticed the same outstanding traits in homeschooled children. Democrats hate and are aggressively scheming to ban homeschooling. They demand total access to the hearts and minds of our kids to transform them into anti-Christian, anti-American and socialist social-justice-warriors. Due to Democrat control of public education, kids are infected with LGBTQ propaganda beginning with preschoolers.
The Trump Train 2020 song music video will debut early February. Enjoy these photos of filming the music video.
C’mon America! Get onboard the Trump Train!
Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American
Help Lloyd spread the Truth
http://LloydMarcus.com


clashdaily--2020-01-17--EPSTEIN: Medical Clues In His Eyes, Legs Point To Murder, Not Hanging

You can add THESE questions to the LONG list of unanswered questions that keep this conspiracy theory ( ? )
going strong .
“ It ’ s five months now and we don ’ t even know the position of the body when it was found by the guard.
” Let ’ s deal with the eyes , first .
The medical term is ‘ petechiae ’ , and refers to the bursting of small blood vessels .
The particular blood vessels of interest here are the ones in the eyes .
Trending : Putting The 'Fat ' In Fatwa @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mosul -- Twitter Reactions Are Comedy GOLD Why is that ?
Because when a person hangs himself in traditional suicide , there isn ’ t normally evidence of burst blood vessels in the victim ’ s eyes .
But murder by strangulation is a different matter .
Strangulation involves much greater force applied to the throat than ordinary hanging , so it generates a lot more pressure .
That pressure often shows up as burst blood vessels in the eyes .
This will NOT , of course , be ‘ conclusive proof ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is one more piece of evidence to be weighed on those scales of probable cause .
Dr. Micahel Baden was back on Fox to explain .
Next , we have the evidence found in his legs .
Any fans of crime shows will be familiar with clues used to determine whether a corpse had been moved , based on how and where blood has pooled and discolored the body .
That ’ s the question being raised here .
If Epstein was hanging by his neck , one would expect to find @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , due to gravity .
If his blood is NOT found pooled in his lower extremities , that raises questions .
The ‘ maroonish purple ’ discoloring you might expect to find on the legs of a hanging victim were not present in Epstein ’ s corpse .
Which raises the question … how do we reconcile this contrary piece of evidence with the allegation that he was ‘ hanged by his neck until dead ’ , as they used to say .
• The Political Misdirections In ABC ’ s ‘ Truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BREAKING : Video Footage Outside Epstein ’ s Cell On The Night Of His FIRST Suicide Attempt Has Been Permanently Deleted • New Epstein Photo Evidence Provides Yet Another Plot Twist • FORENSIC EXPERT : Autopsy Of Jeffrey Epstein ‘ Points To HOMICIDE Rather Than Suicide ’

You can add THESE questions to the LONG list of unanswered questions that keep this conspiracy theory(?) going strong.
“It’s five months now and we don’t even know the position of the body when it was found by the guard.”
Let’s deal with the eyes, first.
The medical term is ‘petechiae’, and refers to the bursting of small blood vessels. The particular blood vessels of interest here are the ones in the eyes.
Why is that?
Because when a person hangs himself in traditional suicide, there isn’t normally evidence of burst blood vessels in the victim’s eyes.
But murder by strangulation is a different matter. Strangulation involves much greater force applied to the throat than ordinary hanging, so it generates a lot more pressure. That pressure often shows up as burst blood vessels in the eyes.
This will NOT, of course, be ‘conclusive proof’ of his cause of death. But it is one more piece of evidence to be weighed on those scales of probable cause.
Dr. Micahel Baden was back on Fox to explain.
Next, we have the evidence found in his legs.
Any fans of crime shows will be familiar with clues used to determine whether a corpse had been moved, based on how and where blood has pooled and discolored the body.
That’s the question being raised here.
If Epstein was hanging by his neck, one would expect to find the blood pooled in his lower extremities, due to gravity. If his blood is NOT found pooled in his lower extremities, that raises questions.
The ‘maroonish purple’ discoloring you might expect to find on the legs of a hanging victim were not present in Epstein’s corpse.
Which raises the question … how do we reconcile this contrary piece of evidence with the allegation that he was ‘hanged by his neck until dead’, as they used to say.
Stories Related to Epstein’s death…