clashdaily--2020-02-28--WATCH: Barr Powerfully Defends Traditional American Liberty Against An All-Powerful Totalitarian Sta

WATCH: Barr Powerfully Defends Traditional American Liberty Against An All-Powerful Totalitarian State!

You know when he leads off with ‘ Conflict of Visions ’ and a quote of Augustine , he is about to say something deeper than ordinary boilerplate speeches of the kind .
Why is it that politics have expanded to subsume every area of life , up to and including what we eat and what we wear ?
Barr takes us all the way back to Greece and the Christian reinterpretation of those values to trace how we got to where we are now .
Our readers are going to enjoy what Barr has to say about the modest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on individual human liberty in our nation ’ s DNA , and how he sets it against Totalitarian ideologies that wear different faces and names , but have a grand view of the State and their role in ripping down the current way of life , to raise up utopian agendas in their place .
If the YouTube link above isn ’ t playing for you , try cutting and pasting into another window .
The only other place I ’ ve located the same speech that this format will support is buried @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remarks begin at about the 14-minute mark of the YouTube version .
Just hearing him describe the Progressive use of taxpayer dollars to bribe and make dependant an entire class of voters to support them is worth taking the time to watch the whole thing .
( From 27:20 ) While they seek power through the Democratic Process , their policy agenda has become more aggressively collectivist , socialist , and explicitly revolutionary .
The crux of the progressive program is the use of the public purse to provide ever-increasing benefits to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ constituency of supporters who are also dependent .
They want able-bodied citizens to become more dependent , subject to greater control , and increasingly supportive of this dependency .
The tacit goal of this project is to convert all of us into 25-year olds living in the government ’ s basement focussing our energies on obtaining a larger allowance rather than getting a job and moving out and taking responsibility for ourselves .
Every time this writer hears this man speak , the depth of insight and understanding he can bring to bear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surprise .

You know when he leads off with ‘Conflict of Visions’ and a quote of Augustine, he is about to say something deeper than ordinary boilerplate speeches of the kind.
Why is it that politics have expanded to subsume every area of life, up to and including what we eat and what we wear?
Barr takes us all the way back to Greece and the Christian reinterpretation of those values to trace how we got to where we are now.
Our readers are going to enjoy what Barr has to say about the modest role of Government and the heavy emphasis on individual human liberty in our nation’s DNA, and how he sets it against Totalitarian ideologies that wear different faces and names, but have a grand view of the State and their role in ripping down the current way of life, to raise up utopian agendas in their place.
Just hearing him describe the Progressive use of taxpayer dollars to bribe and make dependant an entire class of voters to support them is worth taking the time to watch the whole thing. (From 12:29)
While they seek power through the Democratic Process, their policy agenda has become more aggressively collectivist, socialist, and explicitly revolutionary. The crux of the progressive program is the use of the public purse to provide ever-increasing benefits to the public and thereby make a permanent political constituency of supporters who are also dependent. They want able-bodied citizens to become more dependent, subject to greater control, and increasingly supportive of this dependency. The tacit goal of this project is to convert all of us into 25-year olds living in the government’s basement focussing our energies on obtaining a larger allowance rather than getting a job and moving out and taking responsibility for ourselves.
Every time this writer hears this man speak, the depth of insight and understanding he can bring to bear on issues of the day continue to surprise.


clashdaily--2020-02-28--CPAC Invites The ‘Anti-Greta’ To Speak About Environment — Here’s The 411

Unlike Greta , this cute *former* climate alarmist is an adult who actually knows the underlying science… The left is already dismissing Naomi Seibt as some drooling , knuckle-dragging science-denying moron .
Naturally… because destroying her reputation is far easier than interacting with the actual ideas she puts forward .
It ’ s the same thing they do with the rest of us in decrying us as evil , racist , sexist , ‘ istophobic-phobo-phobes ’ .
( To borrow Bongino ’ s line . )
Destroy the messenger and you can dismiss the message .
It ’ s an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to great effect for years .
But — if you scratch below the surface — this chick isn ’ t so easily dismissed as that .
For one thing , she ’ s actually an adult , not just an activist kid cutting class .
For another , she ’ s walked away from the Climate Alarmism that she had once bought in on .
After carefully considering the claims , she has since found them unconvincing .
She does NOT ‘ deny climate change ’ in absolute terms , she ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ For one thing , she doesn ’ t see CO2 as a critical threat to the global ecosystem .
Further than that , she doesn ’ t think that human contribution to the factors driving climactic change are actually tied in any significant way to human behavior .
You can see the rest of what she had to say in the clip .

Unlike Greta, this cute *former* climate alarmist is an adult who actually knows the underlying science…
The left is already dismissing Naomi Seibt as some drooling, knuckle-dragging science-denying moron. Naturally… because destroying her reputation is far easier than interacting with the actual ideas she puts forward.
It’s the same thing they do with the rest of us in decrying us as evil, racist, sexist, ‘istophobic-phobo-phobes’. (To borrow Bongino’s line.)
Destroy the messenger and you can dismiss the message. It’s an intellectually dishonest ploy that they have leveraged to great effect for years.
But — if you scratch below the surface — this chick isn’t so easily dismissed as that.
For one thing, she’s actually an adult, not just an activist kid cutting class.
For another, she’s walked away from the Climate Alarmism that she had once bought in on. After carefully considering the claims, she has since found them unconvincing.
She does NOT ‘deny climate change’ in absolute terms, she’s specific in what she objects to.
For one thing, she doesn’t see CO2 as a critical threat to the global ecosystem. Further than that, she doesn’t think that human contribution to the factors driving climactic change are actually tied in any significant way to human behavior.
You can see the rest of what she had to say in the clip.
Enjoy!


clashdaily--2020-02-28--Rapid Social Change from the Top Down and the Bottom Up

The news is amazing and occasionally unpredictable .
News can be predictable and still be called news , the same way the weather changes in consistent but unscheduled ways .
I want to contrast several political changes I saw last week .
Some occurred because of easily identifiable actors , and some were unpredictable .
As Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said , there are knows , unknowns , and unknown-unknowns .
We knew that Mayor Michael Bloomberg has been buying politicians for years .
We knew that Virginia Democrats were for sale , but we didn ’ t know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how far those Democrat legislators would go with Bloomberg ’ s plans .
Mayor Bloomberg consolidated his takeover of Virginia in last November ’ s election .
He got most of the political change he wanted when the Virginia legislature went into session in January .
I said most , but not all , because the Mayor was frustrated by some of the votes .
His most egregious gun control measures were voted down in committee .
That is where a few Democrat legislators rejected some of the confiscatory gun control that Mayor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ few Democrat legislators opposed their party and stood up for the citizens in their district .
That too happened for a reason .
Politicians have always been for sale , but the wholesale purchase of politicians by billionaires like Soros and Bloomberg is news .
That brings us to the second unexpected change we saw last week .
To understand it , we have to go back to the second-amendment-sanctuary movement started years ago in Illinois .
For those that don ’ t know , Illinois politics are controlled by Chicago .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control , some Illinois counties passed local resolutions and ordinances that opposed the Chicago political machine .
In particular , Chicago Democrats wanted firearms confiscation while Republicans and rural down-state-Democrats wanted the right to keep and bear arms .
Too often , the Chicago Democrats would pass a gun control law that would take decades to overturn in the courts .
To protect their citizens , down-state-politicians in Illinois passed resolutions saying that sheriffs and other local officers would not enforce unconstitutional laws that infringe on the right to keep and bear arms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with their immigration sanctuary cities .
Now , that same issue of local control was used to protect the right of self-defense .
What started in Illinois didn ’ t stay in Illinois .
The second-amendment-sanctuary movement spread over the next few years from Illinois to Colorado , New Mexico , Oregon , Washington , and to Texas .
Bloomberg ’ s takeover of Virginia accelerated the second amendment sanctuary movement .
In the three months since last November ’ s election , 91 of Virginia ’ s 95 counties passed 2A sanctuary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so as well .
A few counties established militia that the sheriff could activate in case of emergency .
Seeing Virginians stripped of their rights by Bloomberg Democrats , the second-amendment-sanctuary movement spread across the US like wildfire .
Sanctuary resolutions quickly passed in Florida .
Fifteen states had new counties and cities become second amendment sanctuaries in the last seven days .
That is an amazingly widespread grassroots groundswell that isn ’ t controlled by a billionaire or by any national civil-rights organization .
The elites couldn ’ t do that if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of us made a few phone calls and walked into the meeting of our county boards .
We ’ ve spoken up before , but this particular movement is both unexpected and politically unpredictable .
It is American democracy in action .
There is one more political change we saw last week .
It was expected but unprecedented .
President Donald Trump changed the political balance of the 9th US circuit court of appeals .
From one perspective , that judge ’ s confirmation simply continues the slow trend as President Trump appoint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history of the 9th circuit .
That court has been wildly political for years .
It was the court you went to when you wanted a statist interpretation of the law so you could expand government power .
It was the circuit most overturned by the US Supreme Court .
That long-standing political bias changed last week when the 9th circuit upheld the federal government ’ s defunding of abortion .
Trump nominated conservative and originalist federal judges .
This is an amazing turn of events since we ’ ve never seen a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would do .
That consistency must frighten the elites .
Limiting government power and returning the United States to the control of the American people is a dangerous job .
It angers the elites like Soros , Bloomberg , and Clinton .
I pray for President Trump ’ s safety.. and for the safety of the elites .
We live in amazing times .
I ’ ll keep my eye on the movement to expand Idaho to include conservative counties in Washington , Oregon , and California .
That is fascinating , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Where are the billionaires for liberty ?
~_~_ I gave you 800 words .
Please like , comment , and share this article with a friend .
RM Sources- “ https : //www.newsweek.com/virginia-gun-control-second-amendment-1484495 “ https : //www.wsls.com/news/local/2019/11/27/list-of-second-amendment-sanctuaries-in-virginia-and-where-its-being-discussed/ “ https : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_sanctuary # Virginia “ https : //www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/06/20/abortion-laws-trump-administration-court-allows-take-effect/1517720001/

The news is amazing and occasionally unpredictable. News can be predictable and still be called news, the same way the weather changes in consistent but unscheduled ways. I want to contrast several political changes I saw last week. Some occurred because of easily identifiable actors, and some were unpredictable. As Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said, there are knows, unknowns, and unknown-unknowns.
The Knowns-
We knew that Mayor Michael Bloomberg has been buying politicians for years. We knew that Virginia Democrats were for sale, but we didn’t know when Bloomberg would have his majority and how far those Democrat legislators would go with Bloomberg’s plans.
Mayor Bloomberg consolidated his takeover of Virginia in last November’s election. He got most of the political change he wanted when the Virginia legislature went into session in January. I said most, but not all, because the Mayor was frustrated by some of the votes. His most egregious gun control measures were voted down in committee. That is where a few Democrat legislators rejected some of the confiscatory gun control that Mayor Bloomberg wanted.
Last week, a few Democrat legislators opposed their party and stood up for the citizens in their district. That too happened for a reason.
Politicians have always been for sale, but the wholesale purchase of politicians by billionaires like Soros and Bloomberg is news.
The Unknowns-
That brings us to the second unexpected change we saw last week. To understand it, we have to go back to the second-amendment-sanctuary movement started years ago in Illinois. For those that don’t know, Illinois politics are controlled by Chicago. In order to have some small measure of control, some Illinois counties passed local resolutions and ordinances that opposed the Chicago political machine. In particular, Chicago Democrats wanted firearms confiscation while Republicans and rural down-state-Democrats wanted the right to keep and bear arms. Too often, the Chicago Democrats would pass a gun control law that would take decades to overturn in the courts. To protect their citizens, down-state-politicians in Illinois passed resolutions saying that sheriffs and other local officers would not enforce unconstitutional laws that infringe on the right to keep and bear arms.
Democrats first established cafeteria-style law enforcement with their immigration sanctuary cities. Now, that same issue of local control was used to protect the right of self-defense.
What started in Illinois didn’t stay in Illinois. The second-amendment-sanctuary movement spread over the next few years from Illinois to Colorado, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington, and to Texas. Bloomberg’s takeover of Virginia accelerated the second amendment sanctuary movement. In the three months since last November’s election, 91 of Virginia’s 95 counties passed 2A sanctuary resolutions. Some cities in Virginia did so as well. A few counties established militia that the sheriff could activate in case of emergency.
Seeing Virginians stripped of their rights by Bloomberg Democrats, the second-amendment-sanctuary movement spread across the US like wildfire. Sanctuary resolutions quickly passed in Florida. Fifteen states had new counties and cities become second amendment sanctuaries in the last seven days. That is an amazingly widespread grassroots groundswell that isn’t controlled by a billionaire or by any national civil-rights organization. The elites couldn’t do that if they tried.. but you did.
Millions of us made a few phone calls and walked into the meeting of our county boards. We’ve spoken up before, but this particular movement is both unexpected and politically unpredictable. It is American democracy in action.
The Unknown Unknowns-
There is one more political change we saw last week. It was expected but unprecedented. President Donald Trump changed the political balance of the 9th US circuit court of appeals. From one perspective, that judge’s confirmation simply continues the slow trend as President Trump appoint more federal judges.
Now consider the history of the 9th circuit. That court has been wildly political for years. It was the court you went to when you wanted a statist interpretation of the law so you could expand government power. It was the circuit most overturned by the US Supreme Court. That long-standing political bias changed last week when the 9th circuit upheld the federal government’s defunding of abortion.
Trump nominated conservative and originalist federal judges. This is an amazing turn of events since we’ve never seen a Republican president do what he said he would do.
That consistency must frighten the elites. Limiting government power and returning the United States to the control of the American people is a dangerous job. It angers the elites like Soros, Bloomberg, and Clinton. I pray for President Trump’s safety.. and for the safety of the elites.
We live in amazing times. I’ll keep my eye on the movement to expand Idaho to include conservative counties in Washington, Oregon, and California. That is fascinating, but it leaves me asking one question.
Where are the billionaires for liberty?
~_~_
I gave you 800 words. Please like, comment, and share this article with a friend. RM
Sources-
“https://www.newsweek.com/virginia-gun-control-second-amendment-1484495
“https://www.wsls.com/news/local/2019/11/27/list-of-second-amendment-sanctuaries-in-virginia-and-where-its-being-discussed/
“https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_sanctuary#Virginia
“https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/06/20/abortion-laws-trump-administration-court-allows-take-effect/1517720001/


clashdaily--2020-02-28--A BIBLICAL CASE FOR EMPIRICISM

A BIBLICAL CASE FOR EMPIRICISM

I know I ’ ve written about empiricism before , but I truly believe it ’ s becoming absolutely imperative that we all start to really pay attention to what is going on around us .
This is even more crucial than ever considering that we have virtually an entire generation that does not know what socialism is .
So , as a refresher , here again is the definition of empirical : 1. originating on observation or experience 2. relying on experience or observation alone 3. capable of being verified or disproven by observation or experiment 4. relating to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ means all knowledge originates in experience . )
While Hebrews 11:1 says “ Faith is the substance of things hoped for , the evidence of things not seen ” , it does not take away from the practical application , and practice of , “ hands on ” spiritual principles .
It becomes a question of balance .
The entire N.T .
book of James speaks of the application of Christianity as a way of life .
This goes outside of the purely theological view and shows the balance of the divine with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the practical application of empirical knowledge comes into play .
In other words , what are you actually seeing/experiencing and how do you respond to it as a Christian ?
There ’ s a sort of reconciliation that has to happen between faith and practicality .
This rests on one very basic truth as found in Job 5:7 “ Yet man is born unto trouble as the sparks fly upward.
” That is the empirical truth for all of us…we ’ re gon na have grief in this life .
At the start @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He was tempted by Satan ( Mt .
4:1-11 ) Christ didn ’ t ignore or deny what Satan attempted to do .
Instead , He confronted Satan head on and used scripture to make his point ( Lk 4:8 ) Christ never denied what was going on around Him .
His example shows us how to keep that balance between the spiritual and the practical .
One of the best examples of Christ using the knowledge of that which is experienced and/or observed to make a point is found in the entirety @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doesn ’ t permit the entire chapter to be reproduced here , but in summary here ’ s the story line : Christ healed a man born blind .
He even did so on the Sabbath , a major no-no to the Jewish religious leaders .
These “ leaders ” were of course very riled that this happened on the Sabbath .
They questioned the man healed as to whether or not he was even blind to begin with .
They questioned the guy ’ s parents to make sure it was the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ son .
They hounded him and tried to get him to change his story .
All this effort was a waste of time , of course .
The man gave all credit for his healing , which he truly experienced , to Christ .
This entire story is almost a comedy routine .
It was completely ridiculous for the Pharisees to deny what they actually saw .
This is not unlike what ’ s happening now in our country .
People will loudly , publicly , deny what they ’ ve seen , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply because it goes against an ideological or religious narrative .
Here are some other very applicable verses ( presented in NIV ) about the nature of wisdom gained through experience and/or observation .
Prov .
7:24 A discerning man keeps wisdom in view , but a fool ’ s eyes wander to the ends of the earth .
Eccl .
2:14 A wise man has eyes in his head , while the fool walks in darkness .
Ezek 12:2 Son of man , you are living among a rebellious people .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see , and ears to hear but do not hear , for they are a rebellious people .
( also see Jer .
5:21 ) HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT Keep paying close attention to what the Dems/progressives/libs/socialists/ ( whatever ) are actually saying .
If they ’ re talking about “ democracy ” , that only means they ’ re still pissed that they lost an election .
Things are only truly “ democratic ” when they win .
New Programs… ?
Listen very , very closely to how they plan to pay for anything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that part unless really pressed .
Then and only then , will they talk taxes .
And Russia… ?
This has become their fall back argument when everything else fails to gain traction .
Too bad they can ’ t be charged with rhetorical cruelty to a dead horse .

I know I’ve written about empiricism before, but I truly believe it’s becoming absolutely imperative that we all start to really pay attention to what is going on around us. This is even more crucial than ever considering that we have virtually an entire generation that does not know what socialism is.
So, as a refresher, here again is the definition of empirical: 1. originating on observation or experience 2. relying on experience or observation alone 3. capable of being verified or disproven by observation or experiment 4. relating to empiricism. (Point #4 further means all knowledge originates in experience.)
While Hebrews 11:1 says “Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen”, it does not take away from the practical application, and practice of, “hands on” spiritual principles. It becomes a question of balance. The entire N.T. book of James speaks of the application of Christianity as a way of life. This goes outside of the purely theological view and shows the balance of the divine with the everyday.
This balance is where the practical application of empirical knowledge comes into play. In other words, what are you actually seeing/experiencing and how do you respond to it as a Christian?
There’s a sort of reconciliation that has to happen between faith and practicality. This rests on one very basic truth as found in Job 5:7 “Yet man is born unto trouble as the sparks fly upward.” That is the empirical truth for all of us…we’re gonna have grief in this life.
At the start of Christ’s earthly ministry, He was tempted by Satan (Mt. 4:1-11) Christ didn’t ignore or deny what Satan attempted to do. Instead, He confronted Satan head on and used scripture to make his point (Lk 4:8)
Christ never denied what was going on around Him. His example shows us how to keep that balance between the spiritual and the practical.
One of the best examples of Christ using the knowledge of that which is experienced and/or observed to make a point is found in the entirety of John Chap. 9. Space doesn’t permit the entire chapter to be reproduced here, but in summary here’s the story line: Christ healed a man born blind. He even did so on the Sabbath, a major no-no to the Jewish religious leaders. These “leaders” were of course very riled that this happened on the Sabbath. They questioned the man healed as to whether or not he was even blind to begin with. They questioned the guy’s parents to make sure it was the right guy and he was really their son. They hounded him and tried to get him to change his story. All this effort was a waste of time, of course. The man gave all credit for his healing, which he truly experienced, to Christ.
This entire story is almost a comedy routine. It was completely ridiculous for the Pharisees to deny what they actually saw. This is not unlike what’s happening now in our country. People will loudly, publicly, deny what they’ve seen, experienced and know to be true, simply because it goes against an ideological or religious narrative.
Here are some other very applicable verses (presented in NIV) about the nature of wisdom gained through experience and/or observation.
Prov. 7:24 A discerning man keeps wisdom in view, but a fool’s eyes wander to the ends of the earth.
Eccl. 2:14 A wise man has eyes in his head, while the fool walks in darkness.
Ezek 12:2 Son of man, you are living among a rebellious people. They have eyes to see but do not see, and ears to hear but do not hear, for they are a rebellious people. (also see Jer. 5:21)
HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT
Keep paying close attention to what the Dems/progressives/libs/socialists/(whatever) are actually saying. If they’re talking about “democracy”, that only means they’re still pissed that they lost an election. Things are only truly “democratic” when they win. New Programs…? Listen very, very closely to how they plan to pay for anything. Chances are, they conveniently skip that part unless really pressed. Then and only then, will they talk taxes. And Russia…? This has become their fall back argument when everything else fails to gain traction. Too bad they can’t be charged with rhetorical cruelty to a dead horse.


clashdaily--2020-02-27--WTF? Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand Says ‘Born Alive’ Bill Takes Away Women’s ‘Religious Freedom’ (VIDEO)

Unlikable Mini-Hillary seems to have lost it — is she talking about Old Testament-style child sacrifice ?
!
I ( half ) joke about the Democrats being the Party of Moloch , but… maybe I ’ m not all that far off after all .
The Democrats have moved lightyears from their original “ Safe , Legal , and Rare ” position on abortion to “ Government-funded , Right up to birth , and Without Apology ” and even that is being pushed to include actual infanticide .
The party that wants to Regulate Every Damned Thing™ doesn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ private decision made between a woman and her doctor.
” Yes , these same people that want the government to provide healthcare don ’ t want to impose any restriction on abortion which they claim is healthcare .
Latest : CPAC Invites The 'Anti-Greta ' To Speak About Environment -- Here 's The 411 Two Republican bills to protect the lives of babies were being voted on in the Senate this week .
One is Senator Lindsey Graham ( R-SC ) ’ s Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act which would restrict abortion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was Senator Ben Sasse ( R-NE ) ’ s Born-Alive Abortion Survivor ’ s Protection Act , and both were labeled in the Media ( D ) as “ anti-abortion ” bills .
Senator Sasse has been clear that his bill does not restrict abortion but instead deals with lifesaving care for infants that survive an abortion procedure .
Senator Sasse ’ s bill would also provide penalties for sick monsters like Kermit Gosnell who was convicted of multiple murders and hundreds of lesser charges .
Both bills failed to gain the 60 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — Democrats don ’ t like it when you say that abortion kills a child .
They ’ d rather think of it like a tooth extraction or an appendectomy .
The reason for this is also very simple .
If you acknowledge the humanity of the child , then it exposes abortion for the horror that it is , and well , you can ’ t have that !
That would mean admitting that Democrats are actually advocating for and cheering on the killing of innocent children .
MSNBC ’ s Andrea @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) about the bills and Sen. Gillibrand brought out the most outrageous claims .
She called it an “ all-out assault on women ” and said that the bills infringed on women ’ s civil rights , human rights , religious freedom , and moral freedom .
She then says that the two measures would “ change the landscape of how we treat a baby who was born that can not survive out of the womb and how those parents want to have those final moments with their child.
” Sen. Gillibrand is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which is telling .
She refuses to acknowledge that late-term abortion is mostly done for the convenience of the mother .
Even the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute study shows that the vast majority of women that choose to abort after 20 weeks are making the decision for the same reasons as the ones choosing to abort before 12 weeks .
She ’ s also not acknowledging that Sen. Sasse ’ s bill is about the protection of the child as well as protecting women from abortion butchers who put their lives at risk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ play the Preachy Pete religion card , and , as with most things she does , it falls flat .
The worst part about this is that Mitchell just lets her get away with it .
Gillibrand ’ s word salad is just typical of the disingenuous Democrats who are pushing further and further towards legal infanticide .
Opposing Sen. Sasse ’ s bill is tantamount to giving approval to kill babies outside of the womb .
But changing words is the name of the game when it comes to the abortion-peddlers .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ waters with regard to abortion with their double-speak .
When several states introduced “ heartbeat ” bills last year , an article in the New York Times about Louisiana ’ s bill actually read , “ The measure would require an ultrasound test for any woman seeking to terminate a pregnancy , and forbid abortion if the test detects embryonic pulsing — which can occur before many women know they are pregnant.
” What is “ embryonic pulsing ” ?
They mean heartbeat , but can not bring themselves to admit that an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , whoever wrote that article is the heartless one .
The same thing has been done with the use of the medical term “ fetus ” which is the Latin word for “ offspring.
” CNN had to backtrack on their coverage this week when they redefined newborn baby to “ a fetus that was born.
” That was a step too far .
Abortion will always be polarizing , but actual infanticide should be something that both parties unequivoally condemn .

Unlikable Mini-Hillary seems to have lost it — is she talking about Old Testament-style child sacrifice?!
I (half) joke about the Democrats being the Party of Moloch, but… maybe I’m not all that far off after all.
The Democrats have moved lightyears from their original “Safe, Legal, and Rare” position on abortion to “Government-funded, Right up to birth, and Without Apology” and even that is being pushed to include actual infanticide.
The party that wants to Regulate Every Damned Thing™ doesn’t want to “interfere” in the “private decision made between a woman and her doctor.” Yes, these same people that want the government to provide healthcare don’t want to impose any restriction on abortion which they claim is healthcare.
Two Republican bills to protect the lives of babies were being voted on in the Senate this week. One is Senator Lindsey Graham(R-SC)’s Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act which would restrict abortion at 20 weeks gestation, the other was Senator Ben Sasse(R-NE)’s Born-Alive Abortion Survivor’s Protection Act, and both were labeled in the Media(D) as “anti-abortion” bills. Senator Sasse has been clear that his bill does not restrict abortion but instead deals with lifesaving care for infants that survive an abortion procedure. Senator Sasse’s bill would also provide penalties for sick monsters like Kermit Gosnell who was convicted of multiple murders and hundreds of lesser charges. Both bills failed to gain the 60 votes needed in the Senate.
Why?
Simple — Democrats don’t like it when you say that abortion kills a child. They’d rather think of it like a tooth extraction or an appendectomy. The reason for this is also very simple. If you acknowledge the humanity of the child, then it exposes abortion for the horror that it is, and well, you can’t have that! That would mean admitting that Democrats are actually advocating for and cheering on the killing of innocent children.
MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell asked Senator Kirsten Gillibrand(D-NY) about the bills and Sen. Gillibrand brought out the most outrageous claims. She called it an “all-out assault on women” and said that the bills infringed on women’s civil rights, human rights, religious freedom, and moral freedom. She then says that the two measures would “change the landscape of how we treat a baby who was born that cannot survive out of the womb and how those parents want to have those final moments with their child.”
Sen. Gillibrand is going right to the fetal abnormality argument, which is telling. She refuses to acknowledge that late-term abortion is mostly done for the convenience of the mother. Even the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute study shows that the vast majority of women that choose to abort after 20 weeks are making the decision for the same reasons as the ones choosing to abort before 12 weeks.
She’s also not acknowledging that Sen. Sasse’s bill is about the protection of the child as well as protecting women from abortion butchers who put their lives at risk.
Sen. Gillibrand is also trying to play the Preachy Pete religion card, and, as with most things she does, it falls flat.
The worst part about this is that Mitchell just lets her get away with it.
.@SenGillibrand on the Senate taking up the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act: An “all-out assault on women” "They’re trying to harm women. They’re trying to take away their civil rights, human rights … They’re taking away their religious freedom" pic.twitter.com/2Ne6rGzpR3 — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) February 25, 2020
Gillibrand’s word salad is just typical of the disingenuous Democrats who are pushing further and further towards legal infanticide.
Opposing Sen. Sasse’s bill is tantamount to giving approval to kill babies outside of the womb.
But changing words is the name of the game when it comes to the abortion-peddlers. The Partisan Presstitutes continue to muddy the waters with regard to abortion with their double-speak. When several states introduced “heartbeat” bills last year, an article in the New York Times about Louisiana’s bill actually read, “The measure would require an ultrasound test for any woman seeking to terminate a pregnancy, and forbid abortion if the test detects embryonic pulsing — which can occur before many women know they are pregnant.” What is “embryonic pulsing”? They mean heartbeat, but cannot bring themselves to admit that an unborn baby has a heart. Truly, whoever wrote that article is the heartless one.
The same thing has been done with the use of the medical term “fetus” which is the Latin word for “offspring.” CNN had to backtrack on their coverage this week when they redefined newborn baby to “a fetus that was born.” That was a step too far.
CNN has updated an article about abortion survivors after facing backlash for describing a baby who survives an abortion attempt as a “fetus that was born.” “CLARIFICATION: This story has been updated to more precisely reflect the language used in Sasse’s bill,” the article read. The original phrasing described the implications of a bill that would require abortion providers to give lifesaving care to a baby who survives the procedure.
I know the news cycle has already come and gone, but I hope we never forget that CNN decided to call a literal baby a “fetus that was born.” Don’t tell me there isn’t rampant bias when it comes to covering abortion — or, apparently, care for infants. — Alexandra DeSanctis (@xan_desanctis) February 26, 2020
Students for Life of America President Kristan Hawkins similarly blasted the network in a statement to Fox News, saying “CNN needs a refresher course on basic human development.” “A fetus that was born is called a baby,” Hawkins said. “And a baby born during an abortion and left to die is a victim of infanticide. These basic facts should be common knowledge. But the verbal gymnastics of the abortion lobby shows just how anxious they are to hide the truth of what they are working for — abortion up to and including infanticide.” Source: Fox news
Abortion will always be polarizing, but actual infanticide should be something that both parties unequivoally condemn.


clashdaily--2020-02-27--OOPS: Two Doctors Catching Hell For Removing Transgender Patient’s Vagina Without Permission

As SNAFUs go this one ’ s a doozy .
If they haven ’ t lawyered up already , they ’ re gon na want to do it soon .
The female-to-male transgender wanted surgery for a hysterectomy and the creation of a penis .
But ‘ patient A ’ did NOT want to go all-in and remove the vagina at the same time .
Two Harley Street doctors have been suspended after removing the vagina of a trans patient without his consent , in a case believed to be the first of its kind .
The man – who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ left ‘ distraught ’ and in floods of tears after the irreversible gender reassignment surgery , a tribunal heard .
Giulio Garaffa , a renowned penis consultant , mistakenly carried out the procedure and his colleague Marco Capece ‘ in a moment of panic… dishonestly ’ altered a form to say that consent had in fact been given , a disciplinary panel was told .
The patient – who had consented to two other forms of surgery as part of the transitioning process – only discovered that his vagina had been removed a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guilty of four charges of misconduct and was handed a five month suspension whilst Dr Capece was found guilty of three misconduct charges and suspended for 12 months .
— DailyMail This will come as bad news for other people wanting the same kind of surgery .
Dr. Garaffa , who performed the surgery at Highgate Private Hospital in North London , is a ‘ penis consultant ’ who is renowned across Europe for his specialism in penis enlargement and reconstruction surgery .
The tribunal heard his specialist skills are such that he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world capable of performing specific procedures .
He was criticised by the panel for failing to check that the patient had consented to the vaginectomy .
— DailyMail

As SNAFUs go this one’s a doozy. If they haven’t lawyered up already, they’re gonna want to do it soon.
The female-to-male transgender wanted surgery for a hysterectomy and the creation of a penis. But ‘patient A’ did NOT want to go all-in and remove the vagina at the same time.
Two Harley Street doctors have been suspended after removing the vagina of a trans patient without his consent, in a case believed to be the first of its kind.
The man – who was transitioning from a woman – was left ‘distraught’ and in floods of tears after the irreversible gender reassignment surgery, a tribunal heard.
Giulio Garaffa, a renowned penis consultant, mistakenly carried out the procedure and his colleague Marco Capece ‘in a moment of panic… dishonestly’ altered a form to say that consent had in fact been given, a disciplinary panel was told.
The patient – who had consented to two other forms of surgery as part of the transitioning process – only discovered that his vagina had been removed a week afterwards.
Dr Garaffa was found guilty of four charges of misconduct and was handed a five month suspension whilst Dr Capece was found guilty of three misconduct charges and suspended for 12 months. — DailyMail
This will come as bad news for other people wanting the same kind of surgery.
Dr. Garaffa, who performed the surgery at Highgate Private Hospital in North London, is a ‘penis consultant’ who is renowned across Europe for his specialism in penis enlargement and reconstruction surgery.
The tribunal heard his specialist skills are such that he is one of only two doctors in the world capable of performing specific procedures.
He was criticised by the panel for failing to check that the patient had consented to the vaginectomy. — DailyMail


clashdaily--2020-02-27--The Left Hates America: Farrakhan Calls Terrorists His ‘Brothers’, Ilhan Pushes Propaganda

The Left ’ s habitual disdain for America is hard to miss .
They claim to be patriotic , yet seem to admire other countries more than their own .
Earlier this week , Ilhan Omar caught heat for a tweet that was trying to heap scorn on the political right who she thinks are bigots who are ‘ triggered ’ by her very existence .
Here ’ s an image of both her tweet , and Senator Cruz ’ s response : Of course , everyone who called her out as anti-American was automatically a ‘ bigot ’ for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blah , blah ) But she and other leftists seem pretty cool about slagging America while cozying up to some of the worst people in the world… including terrorists .
And Farrakhan ( who has plenty of connections to the Democrats and leftists movements ) has recently denounced America for killing off his dear brothers… guys like Soleimani and Ghadafi .
You remember Farrakhan , don ’ t you ?
He ’ s the guy who showed up in that suppressed photo with the Congressional Black Caucus and — Barack Obama .
Barack @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Presidential ambitions from the living room of an unrepentant domestic terrorist .
The hard Left loves them some America-hating .
No wonder Bernie is getting so much traction with their party .
He wishes America was more like Venezuela… minus the natural economic CONSEQUENCES of his beloved Socialism .
We ’ ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with a less than stellar past , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

The Left’s habitual disdain for America is hard to miss. They claim to be patriotic, yet seem to admire other countries more than their own.
Earlier this week, Ilhan Omar caught heat for a tweet that was trying to heap scorn on the political right who she thinks are bigots who are ‘triggered’ by her very existence.
Here’s an image of both her tweet, and Senator Cruz’s response:
Of course, everyone who called her out as anti-American was automatically a ‘bigot’ for having done so. (Blah, blah, blah)
But she and other leftists seem pretty cool about slagging America while cozying up to some of the worst people in the world… including terrorists.
And Farrakhan (who has plenty of connections to the Democrats and leftists movements) has recently denounced America for killing off his dear brothers… guys like Soleimani and Ghadafi.
NOI Leader Louis Farrakhan: "Mr. Trump Killed My Brother Soleimani, Mrs. Clinton Killed My Brother Qaddafi" pic.twitter.com/mMqNf1C0w1 — MEMRI (@MEMRIReports) February 26, 2020
You remember Farrakhan, don’t you? He’s the guy who showed up in that suppressed photo with the Congressional Black Caucus and — Barack Obama. Barack, in turn, curiously launched his Presidential ambitions from the living room of an unrepentant domestic terrorist.
The hard Left loves them some America-hating.
No wonder Bernie is getting so much traction with their party. He wishes America was more like Venezuela… minus the natural economic CONSEQUENCES of his beloved Socialism.
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-02-27--LMAO: Over 200 Cherokees Have Signed A Letter To Sen. Warren To Address Her Claims Of Being Native A

LMAO: Over 200 Cherokees Have Signed A Letter To Sen. Warren To Address Her Claims Of Being Native American

If you thought all was forgiven for her bogus Cherokee status claims — guess again .
While Liz Warren was carping about Bloomberg ’ s NDA ’ s , these guys were still pissed about her DNA .
More than 200 Cherokees and other Native Americans have signed a letter urging Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren to fully retract her past claims to being Native and help dispel false beliefs held by many white people that they have American Indian ancestry .
The letter cites a Los Angeles Times investigation that found more than $ 800 million in government contracts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ set up by members of groups with dubious claims to being Cherokee and Creek Indian tribes .
The letter describes The Times ’ findings as an example of the harm done when white people rely on family lore and DNA tests to falsely assert Native American identity .
The criticism comes at an awkward time for Warren .
The Massachusetts senator did not win any of the first three states in the nominating calendar and faces an uphill battle in the South Carolina primary this Saturday .
In response , Warren sent a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tuesday night .
Her letter repeated past apologies , reiterated that she is a “ white woman ” and detailed a policy agenda that she said was good for Indian Country .
“ I was wrong to have identified as a Native American , and , without qualification or excuse , I apologize , ” she wrote .
Warren ’ s campaign provided a copy to The Times .
She also distanced herself from the cases cited in The Times investigation , which she called an “ injustice.
” She said her “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never benefited financially or professionally , ” and cited a Boston Globe story that concluded her past identification as Native American never boosted her career .
Never boosted her career ?
Are you sure about that Kimosabe , or do you have a friendly press running interference for you .
We seem to remember Harvard touting her as being Native American , as well as a story we ran on her Bar Association card indicating Indian ethnicity .
A detail like that sure didn ’ t HURT her employment chances in an era @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their ethnic diversity bona fides , would it ?
And if there is anything more than absolute zero possibility that SHE was hired with an eye to meeting affirmative action staffing requirements , then she was EXPLICITLY a beneficiary of the harm that she so explicitly denounced in her reply as ‘ an injustice ’ .
It was an injustice to lie for what amounted to considerable professional benefit — she ’ s a Senator running for President as a direct result of that chain of events , including her employment at Harvard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alternate history where she didn ’ t make that racial claim , someone with ACTUAL native ancestry might have gotten that Harvard post ?
Who knows , maybe even have made the same play for high political office , too ?
We ’ ll never know , now , will we ?
LMAO : A Descendant From Pocahontas Tomahawks Elizabeth Warren Into Next Week WATCH : Sen. Elizabeth ‘ Pocahontas ’ Warren APOLOGIZES To Native Americans And SCRUBS DNA Test From Her Website TRAIL OF TEARS TROUBLE : Now Pocahontas Faces Another ‘ @ @ @

If you thought all was forgiven for her bogus Cherokee status claims — guess again.
While Liz Warren was carping about Bloomberg’s NDA’s, these guys were still pissed about her DNA.
More than 200 Cherokees and other Native Americans have signed a letter urging Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren to fully retract her past claims to being Native and help dispel false beliefs held by many white people that they have American Indian ancestry.
The letter cites a Los Angeles Times investigation that found more than $800 million in government contracts reserved for minorities instead went to companies set up by members of groups with dubious claims to being Cherokee and Creek Indian tribes.
The letter describes The Times’ findings as an example of the harm done when white people rely on family lore and DNA tests to falsely assert Native American identity.
The criticism comes at an awkward time for Warren. The Massachusetts senator did not win any of the first three states in the nominating calendar and faces an uphill battle in the South Carolina primary this Saturday.
In response, Warren sent a 12-page letter to the Cherokee authors on Tuesday night. Her letter repeated past apologies, reiterated that she is a “white woman” and detailed a policy agenda that she said was good for Indian Country.
“I was wrong to have identified as a Native American, and, without qualification or excuse, I apologize,” she wrote. Warren’s campaign provided a copy to The Times.
She also distanced herself from the cases cited in The Times investigation, which she called an “injustice.” She said her “situation differs from these cases because I never benefited financially or professionally,” and cited a Boston Globe story that concluded her past identification as Native American never boosted her career.
Never boosted her career? Are you sure about that Kimosabe, or do you have a friendly press running interference for you.
We seem to remember Harvard touting her as being Native American, as well as a story we ran on her Bar Association card indicating Indian ethnicity.
A detail like that sure didn’t HURT her employment chances in an era where institutions were working hard to prove their ethnic diversity bona fides, would it?
And if there is anything more than absolute zero possibility that SHE was hired with an eye to meeting affirmative action staffing requirements, then she was EXPLICITLY a beneficiary of the harm that she so explicitly denounced in her reply as ‘an injustice’.
It was an injustice to lie for what amounted to considerable professional benefit — she’s a Senator running for President as a direct result of that chain of events, including her employment at Harvard.
Is it possible that in an alternate history where she didn’t make that racial claim, someone with ACTUAL native ancestry might have gotten that Harvard post? Who knows, maybe even have made the same play for high political office, too?
We’ll never know, now, will we?
Related…
LMAO: A Descendant From Pocahontas Tomahawks Elizabeth Warren Into Next Week
MOCKING POCAHONTAS: Trump’s Favorite Meme-Maker Hammers Elizabeth Warren
WATCH: Sen. Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren APOLOGIZES To Native Americans And SCRUBS DNA Test From Her Website
TRAIL OF TEARS TROUBLE: Now Pocahontas Faces Another ‘Ancestral Nightmare’


clashdaily--2020-02-27--Coronavirus: Virologist’s Advice On How To Prepare Now If COVID-19 Is Declared A Pandemic

It isn ’ t paranoia to be prepared .
Dr. Ian Mackay , a virologist , wrote a post in his blog , Virology Down Under , that although COVID-19 isn ’ t widespread in most parts of the world , it ’ s not a bad idea to make a list and prepare a “ Pandemic Stash ” box .
Dr. Mackay is an adjunct Associate Professor at the University of Queensland , Australia , with a Ph.D. in virology , so he knows what he ’ s talking about .
First , Dr. Mackay says the post is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a pandemic and that doesn ’ t necessarily mean that it will be severe , just that it was spread widely .
This post is based on the assumption that a pandemic will occur at some point and that Wave 1 will impact us , wherever we live , in the coming weeks and months .
We don ’ t know for certain how severe a COVID-19 pandemic will be .
We may be able to assume it ’ s a mild or perhaps moderate pandemic , not a severe one , according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Plan for Pandemic Influenza scenarios .
[ 4 ] But we won ’ t know for sure until we see spread in countries that ask questions , define cases , and test for SARS-CoV-2 in the same way that we do .
Dr. Mackay says that although there are many things out of our control , there are precautions that we can take to reduce the risk of being infected and being prepared in case of shortages .
He writes that wearing a mask seems like a good idea , it can be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ security .
They are better suited to be used by sick people to prevent the spread of their illness rather than to prevent infection .
• Stay at least 2m away from obviously sick people .
We ’ re trying to avoid receiving a cough/sneeze in the face , shaking hands , or being in the range of droplet splatter and the “ drop zone ” • Wash your hands for 20 seconds & more frequently than you do now Soap and water and then dry , or an alcohol-based hand rub , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ touch your face .
There is a chance your unwashed fingers will have a virus on them and if you touch/rub your mouth , nose or eyes , you may introduce the virus and accidentally infect yourself .
Practice this ; get others to call you out when you forget .
Make it a game .
Dr. Mackay writes “ …label up a “ Pandemic Stash ” box , and begin to slowly fill it with items that won ’ t go off and that you won ’ t touch unless needed .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ weekly shop .
Don ’ t buy things you won ’ t eat later , don ’ t hoard and don ’ t buy more than you ’ ll need for a 2 week period .
We ’ re not talking zombie apocalypse and we very probably won ’ t see power or water interruptions either.
” The list includes food , prescriptions , over-the-counter medication , toiletries , cleaning supplies , and items needed to care for the sick .
He suggests a supply that would last two weeks .
• Extra @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of these may be a problem , so talk to your doctor soon .
• Over-the-counter anti-fever and pain medications paracetamol and ibuprofen can go a long way to making us feel less sick • Vitamins In case food shortages limit the variety in your diet • Ultra-heat treated or powdered milk Ian is not drinking black coffee , no matter what • Batteries for anything that needs batteries , powerbanks • Think about elderly relative ’ s needs Their medications , pets , pandemic stash , plans for care ( see later @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be added to the above list if supplies slow down due to supply chain issues that can occur in a more severe pandemic .
Dr. Mackay also says that it ’ s a good to check in on elderly relatives who are more susceptible to infection .
It might also be a good time to make sure that they have plans in place in case they do become ill .
It will be important to check that your parents and grandparents have prepared a Will and have considered an Enduring Power of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make care-based decisions for themselves .
These aren ’ t fun to organise or think about , but they ’ re important whether we see a COVID-19 pandemic or not , so just use this as a reminder to get it done .
He ends by saying that a virus “ doesn ’ t care about our beliefs , our sex or gender , our colour or our clothes – it just wants to make a home in our human cells.
” We do have some experience of a pandemic and it wasn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ H1N1 “ swine flu ” in 2009 had some unhappy consequences , but it was by no means a zombie apocalypse .
China has bought us time to prepare .
Let ’ s not waste any more of it .
Instead , let ’ s get our planning hats on and all work the problem together .
This is one of those rare times when we ’ re unarguably all in this together .
This is 100 % true .
There are things that we can do right now which is a much @ @ @ @ @ @

It isn’t paranoia to be prepared.
Dr. Ian Mackay, a virologist, wrote a post in his blog, Virology Down Under, that although COVID-19 isn’t widespread in most parts of the world, it’s not a bad idea to make a list and prepare a “Pandemic Stash” box. Dr. Mackay is an adjunct Associate Professor at the University of Queensland, Australia, with a Ph.D. in virology, so he knows what he’s talking about.
First, Dr. Mackay says the post is based on assumptions that COVID-19 will become a pandemic and that doesn’t necessarily mean that it will be severe, just that it was spread widely.
This post is based on the assumption that a pandemic will occur at some point and that Wave 1 will impact us, wherever we live, in the coming weeks and months. We don’t know for certain how severe a COVID-19 pandemic will be. We may be able to assume it’s a mild or perhaps moderate pandemic, not a severe one, according to definitions in the Australian Health Management Plan for Pandemic Influenza scenarios.[4] But we won’t know for sure until we see spread in countries that ask questions, define cases, and test for SARS-CoV-2 in the same way that we do.
Dr. Mackay says that although there are many things out of our control, there are precautions that we can take to reduce the risk of being infected and being prepared in case of shortages.
Reducing Risk of Infection
He writes that wearing a mask seems like a good idea, it can be misused and create a false sense of security. They are better suited to be used by sick people to prevent the spread of their illness rather than to prevent infection.
Stay at least 2m away from obviously sick people.
We’re trying to avoid receiving a cough/sneeze in the face, shaking hands, or being in the range of droplet splatter and the “drop zone”
We’re trying to avoid receiving a cough/sneeze in the face, shaking hands, or being in the range of droplet splatter and the “drop zone” Wash your hands for 20 seconds & more frequently than you do now
Soap and water and then dry, or an alcohol-based hand rub, and air dry
Soap and water and then dry, or an alcohol-based hand rub, and air dry Try not to touch your face.
There is a chance your unwashed fingers will have a virus on them and if you touch/rub your mouth, nose or eyes, you may introduce the virus and accidentally infect yourself. Practice this; get others to call you out when you forget. Make it a game.
Stock Up
Dr. Mackay writes “…label up a “Pandemic Stash” box, and begin to slowly fill it with items that won’t go off and that you won’t touch unless needed. Buy a few of the things each weekly shop. Don’t buy things you won’t eat later, don’t hoard and don’t buy more than you’ll need for a 2 week period. We’re not talking zombie apocalypse and we very probably won’t see power or water interruptions either.”
The list includes food, prescriptions, over-the-counter medication, toiletries, cleaning supplies, and items needed to care for the sick. He suggests a supply that would last two weeks.
Extra prescription medications, asthma relief inhalers
Some of these may be a problem, so talk to your doctor soon.
Some of these may be a problem, so talk to your doctor soon. Over-the-counter anti-fever and pain medications
paracetamol and ibuprofen can go a long way to making us feel less sick
paracetamol and ibuprofen can go a long way to making us feel less sick Feminine hygiene products
Family pack of toilet paper
Vitamins
In case food shortages limit the variety in your diet
In case food shortages limit the variety in your diet Alcohol-containing hand rub and soap
Household cleaning agents
Bleach, floor cleaner, toilet cleaner, surface cleaning spray, laundry detergent
Bleach, floor cleaner, toilet cleaner, surface cleaning spray, laundry detergent Tissues, paper towel
Disposable nappies
Cereals, grains, beans, lentils, pasta
Tinned food – fish, vegetables, fruit
Oil, spices and flavours
Dried fruit and nuts
Ultra-heat treated or powdered milk
Ian is not drinking black coffee, no matter what
Ian is not drinking black coffee, no matter what Batteries for anything that needs batteries, powerbanks
Think about elderly relative’s needs
Their medications, pets, pandemic stash, plans for care (see later)
Their medications, pets, pandemic stash, plans for care (see later) Pet food and care
Dry and tinned food, litter tray liners, medicines, anti-flea drops
Dry and tinned food, litter tray liners, medicines, anti-flea drops Soft drink or candy/chocolate for treats
He also has a last-minute list to be added to the above list if supplies slow down due to supply chain issues that can occur in a more severe pandemic.
Bread, wraps
Meat for freezing
Milk
Eggs
Yogurt
Vegetables, fruit
Fuel for your car
Dr. Mackay also says that it’s a good to check in on elderly relatives who are more susceptible to infection. It might also be a good time to make sure that they have plans in place in case they do become ill.
It will be important to check that your parents and grandparents have prepared a Will and have considered an Enduring Power of Attorney in case they are unable to make care-based decisions for themselves. These aren’t fun to organise or think about, but they’re important whether we see a COVID-19 pandemic or not, so just use this as a reminder to get it done.
He ends by saying that a virus “doesn’t care about our beliefs, our sex or gender, our colour or our clothes – it just wants to make a home in our human cells.”
We do have some experience of a pandemic and it wasn’t panic-worthy. The pandemic of H1N1 “swine flu” in 2009 had some unhappy consequences, but it was by no means a zombie apocalypse. China has bought us time to prepare. Let’s not waste any more of it. Instead, let’s get our planning hats on and all work the problem together. This is one of those rare times when we’re unarguably all in this together. Source: Virology Down Under
This is 100% true. There are things that we can do right now which is a much better idea than panicking later.


clashdaily--2020-02-27--FAKE NEWS ON NOTICE: The NY Times Just Got Some BAD News — The Trump Campaign Files A Libel Lawsuit

You might call it another step in reigning in election interference .
They are taking on fake news .
The New York Times is all-in on their Anti-Trump rhetoric .
Not just because they see things in his presidency they want to denounce , but because they actively want to slander and destroy him .
We know this due to the leaked meeting details in which the Editorial Board decided that — with the failure of Russian Collusion to bear fruit against him — they needed to reframe their negative reporting against him .
They decided that the remaining 2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ term would feature a Trump-is-racist angle in their reporting .
LEAKED : New York Times Staff Meeting Reveals The NEW Plan On How To Cover President Trump President Donald Trump ’ s re-election campaign said on Wednesday it filed a libel suit against the New York Times accusing the newspaper of intentionally publishing a false opinion article related to Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election .
…The lawsuit relates to a March 27 , 2019 , opinion article written by Max Frankel , who served as executive editor of the Times from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a news release a draft copy of the suit accusing the newspaper of “ extreme bias against ( the campaign ) and animosity ” and cited what it called the Times ’ “ exuberance to improperly influence the presidential election in November 2020.
” Trump is seeking re-election on Nov. 3 .
The Times did not have an immediate comment .
The opinion piece was headlined , “ The Real Trump-Russia Quid Pro Quo ” with a subhead adding , “ The campaign and the Kremlin had an overarching deal : help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foreign policy.
” Quid pro quo is a Latin term meaning a favor in exchange for a favor .
…In the opinion piece , Frankel stated , “ Collusion – or a lack of it – turns out to have been the rhetorical trap that ensnared President Trump ’ s pursuers.
” Frankel added , “ There was no need for detailed electoral collusion between the Trump campaign and Vladimir Putin ’ s oligarchy because they had an overarching deal : the quid of help in the campaign against Hillary Clinton for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , starting with relief from the Obama administration ’ s burdensome economic sanctions .
The Trumpites knew about the quid and held out the prospect of the quo.
” “ Today the President ’ s re-election campaign filed suit against the New York Times for falsely stating the Campaign had an ‘ overarching deal ’ with ‘ Vladimir Putin ’ s oligarchy ’ to ‘ help the campaign against Hillary Clinton ’ in exchange for ‘ a new pro-Russian foreign policy , starting with relief from … economic sanctions , ' ” said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Donald J. Trump for President , Inc. “ The statements were and are 100 percent false and defamatory .
The complaint alleges The Times was aware of the falsity at the time it published them , but did so for the intentional purpose of hurting the campaign , while misleading its own readers in the process , ” Ellis said .
Even AFTER the Mueller Report came up empty… the Times was still pushing the Russia Narrative .
Nick Sandmann and the Covington Kids have shown us the only remedy that will get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hos no apparent interest in preserving their integrity , their professionalism or their reputation .
Hit them in the wallet .
Will this stop the Times from behaving like the defacto AV department of the Democrat party ?
That will depend on how hard they are hit by the lawsuit .

You might call it another step in reigning in election interference.
They are taking on fake news.
The New York Times is all-in on their Anti-Trump rhetoric. Not just because they see things in his presidency they want to denounce, but because they actively want to slander and destroy him.
We know this due to the leaked meeting details in which the Editorial Board decided that — with the failure of Russian Collusion to bear fruit against him — they needed to reframe their negative reporting against him.
They decided that the remaining 2 years of the President’s first term would feature a Trump-is-racist angle in their reporting.
LEAKED: New York Times Staff Meeting Reveals The NEW Plan On How To Cover President Trump
Team Trump is pushing back.
President Donald Trump’s re-election campaign said on Wednesday it filed a libel suit against the New York Times accusing the newspaper of intentionally publishing a false opinion article related to Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election.
…The lawsuit relates to a March 27, 2019, opinion article written by Max Frankel, who served as executive editor of the Times from 1986 to 1994.
The campaign attached to a news release a draft copy of the suit accusing the newspaper of “extreme bias against (the campaign) and animosity” and cited what it called the Times’ “exuberance to improperly influence the presidential election in November 2020.” Trump is seeking re-election on Nov. 3.
The Times did not have an immediate comment.
Per Reuters:
The opinion piece was headlined, “The Real Trump-Russia Quid Pro Quo” with a subhead adding, “The campaign and the Kremlin had an overarching deal: help beat Hillary Clinton for a new pro-Russian foreign policy.” Quid pro quo is a Latin term meaning a favor in exchange for a favor.
…In the opinion piece, Frankel stated, “Collusion – or a lack of it – turns out to have been the rhetorical trap that ensnared President Trump’s pursuers.”
Frankel added, “There was no need for detailed electoral collusion between the Trump campaign and Vladimir Putin’s oligarchy because they had an overarching deal: the quid of help in the campaign against Hillary Clinton for the quo of a new pro-Russian foreign policy, starting with relief from the Obama administration’s burdensome economic sanctions. The Trumpites knew about the quid and held out the prospect of the quo.”
“Today the President’s re-election campaign filed suit against the New York Times for falsely stating the Campaign had an ‘overarching deal’ with ‘Vladimir Putin’s oligarchy’ to ‘help the campaign against Hillary Clinton’ in exchange for ‘a new pro-Russian foreign policy, starting with relief from … economic sanctions,'” said Jenna Ellis, senior legal adviser to Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
“The statements were and are 100 percent false and defamatory. The complaint alleges The Times was aware of the falsity at the time it published them, but did so for the intentional purpose of hurting the campaign, while misleading its own readers in the process,” Ellis said.
Even AFTER the Mueller Report came up empty… the Times was still pushing the Russia Narrative.
Nick Sandmann and the Covington Kids have shown us the only remedy that will get the attention of a Media industry that hos no apparent interest in preserving their integrity, their professionalism or their reputation.
Hit them in the wallet.
Will this stop the Times from behaving like the defacto AV department of the Democrat party?
That will depend on how hard they are hit by the lawsuit.


Evangelism Jesus Style

If everybody in Christian publishing is an expert on evangelism these days , why are their methods so different from the explicit mandate Jesus gave the Twelve ?
For one thing , Jesus didn ’ t start people off with dramatic culture shock , he started close to home , in their own communities and country .
What about the divine blessing when you enter a home , or the ‘ shake the dust off ’ denunciation of those who reject the good news ?
Do those make the list of ‘ evangelism ’ ?
What else are we missing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : The NY Times Just Got Some BAD News — The Trump Campaign Files A Libel Lawsuit That ’ s what this week ’ s Warriors & Wildmen show digs into this week .
You can watch the video on a couple of different platforms , or you can bring it with you as a podcast to redeem your commute , catch it while you ’ re in the gym or wherever else you like to catch your podcasts .
Prefer to stream the video ?
We ’ ve got that too : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go with our audio format… Don ’ t miss the next one !
Subscribe for the podcast on your favorite platform : You can also check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily ’ s Big Dawg .
Also , don ’ t miss out on Doug Giles ’ best-selling book ; Rules For Radical Christians is not a survival devotional designed to help the young Christian adult limp through life .
Rather , it is a road-tested , dominion blueprint that will equip the young adult with leadership skills and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of influence in an overtly non-Christian culture .
Rules For Radical Christians gives the reader the keys to become strategically equipped to move into an anti-theistic environment and effectively influence it for the glory of God .
You can choose either the classic Paperback to trigger your college professors and quasi-communist classmates , or the Kindle edition to always have it on hand .

If everybody in Christian publishing is an expert on evangelism these days, why are their methods so different from the explicit mandate Jesus gave the Twelve?
For one thing, Jesus didn’t start people off with dramatic culture shock, he started close to home, in their own communities and country.
What about the divine blessing when you enter a home, or the ‘shake the dust off’ denunciation of those who reject the good news? Do those make the list of ‘evangelism’?
What else are we missing?
That’s what this week’s Warriors & Wildmen show digs into this week.
You can watch the video on a couple of different platforms, or you can bring it with you as a podcast to redeem your commute, catch it while you’re in the gym or wherever else you like to catch your podcasts.
Prefer to stream the video? We’ve got that too: Roku — FireTV — AndroidTV)
Or go with our audio format…
Don’t miss the next one! Subscribe for the podcast on your favorite platform:
Apple Podcasts
Google Play Music
Spotify
Soundcloud
Stitcher
You can also check out ClashRadio for more wit and wisdom from ClashDaily’s Big Dawg.
Also, don’t miss out on Doug Giles’ best-selling book;
Rules For Radical Christians is not a survival devotional designed to help the young Christian adult limp through life. Rather, it is a road-tested, dominion blueprint that will equip the young adult with leadership skills and sufficient motivation to rise to a place of influence in an overtly non-Christian culture. Rules For Radical Christians gives the reader the keys to become strategically equipped to move into an anti-theistic environment and effectively influence it for the glory of God.
Get yours today!
You can choose either the classic Paperback to trigger your college professors and quasi-communist classmates, or the Kindle edition to always have it on hand.


clashdaily--2020-02-27--MEME OF THE DAY: Mini Mike Doesn’t Need Training Wheels (Video)

You ’ d think a Billionaire could afford better advisors .
Advisors that would keep him from stepping on rakes @ @ @ @ @ , who only stands roughly three meatballs tall… … was too obtuse to see that @ @ @ @ @ in a reference to his suitability for the position as President might be handing his @ @ @ @ @ : FAKE NEWS ON NOTICE : The NY Times Just Got Some BAD News — @ @ @ @ @ Libel Lawsuit So , what did they do with his training wheels comment ?
They @ @ @ @ @ course !

You’d think a Billionaire could afford better advisors. Advisors that would keep him from stepping on rakes like this one.
Bloomberg, who only stands roughly three meatballs tall…
… was too obtuse to see that invoking ‘training wheels’ in a reference to his suitability for the position as President might be handing his opponents a gift.
(And that meatball photo? As stupid as it sounds, that brain fart came from Bloomberg’s OWN people.)
So, what did they do with his training wheels comment?
They mocked him with it… of course!
Good going, Bloomberg!
Keep ’em coming!


clashdaily--2020-02-27--Pete Davidson Regrets Apologizing To Rep. Dan Crenshaw And Making Him Famous ‘For No Reason’

Here ’ s another reminder of why turning politics into your religion tends to poison the soul .
SNL loves to get political… in particular , they like to attack Republicans for any reason or none at all .
And during the election that eventually sent Dan Crenshaw ( no to mention the Squad ) to DC , SNL was making fun of Republican candidates… including this guy with an eye patch .
You know the story… Dan Crenshaw lost his eye during military service .
SNL was dragged for mocking injured vets .
And Dan Crenshaw showed a spirit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come on the show and do a bit with Pete Davidson — the guy who mocked him .
Well , Crenshaw not only won his seat , but has stood out as a rising star among the Repubicans .
Davidson is NOT happy about that .
Not one bit .
Trending : FAKE NEWS ON NOTICE : The NY Times Just Got Some BAD News — The Trump Campaign Files A Libel Lawsuit He ’ s now taking pot-shots at Crenshaw over it .
Wow , Pete .
How petty and small can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suicidal , not long after this bit , and Dan Crenshaw reached out to you , to help you walk back from that proverbial ledge ?
That is how you show grace and humanity to people you disagree with .
Whatever the hell YOU are doing is exactly the opposite of grace and humanity .
As for ‘ making him famous ’ ?
We ’ re pretty confident that a guy with his chops and social media know-how would have done just fine without you .
You folks on the left can stop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ until you start treating people you disagree with as people , rather than targets to be hated , dehumanized , and ( in many cases ) blasted into personal and financial ruin .
Maybe Pete can reflect on where life has taken him in the last two years and make a decision to stop being an odious toad .
The SNL Star Who MOCKED Navy SEAL Hero Is Now Being Helped By Him BOOM !
Wounded Navy SEAL , Who Was Ridiculed By SNL Punk , Just Got The LAST LAUGH Oops : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mock … Into A Sex Symbol War Hero Gets Labeled A NAZI – His Response Is PURE GOLD

Here’s another reminder of why turning politics into your religion tends to poison the soul.
SNL loves to get political… in particular, they like to attack Republicans for any reason or none at all. And during the election that eventually sent Dan Crenshaw (no to mention the Squad) to DC, SNL was making fun of Republican candidates… including this guy with an eye patch.
You know the story… Dan Crenshaw lost his eye during military service. SNL was dragged for mocking injured vets. And Dan Crenshaw showed a spirit of generosity and forgiveness by agreeing to come on the show and do a bit with Pete Davidson — the guy who mocked him.
Well, Crenshaw not only won his seat, but has stood out as a rising star among the Repubicans. Davidson is NOT happy about that. Not one bit.
He’s now taking pot-shots at Crenshaw over it.
Wow, Pete. How petty and small can you get?
Remember when you were suicidal, not long after this bit, and Dan Crenshaw reached out to you, to help you walk back from that proverbial ledge?
That is how you show grace and humanity to people you disagree with.
Whatever the hell YOU are doing is exactly the opposite of grace and humanity.
As for ‘making him famous’? We’re pretty confident that a guy with his chops and social media know-how would have done just fine without you.
You folks on the left can stop pretending to have the moral high ground until you start treating people you disagree with as people, rather than targets to be hated, dehumanized, and (in many cases) blasted into personal and financial ruin.
Maybe Pete can reflect on where life has taken him in the last two years and make a decision to stop being an odious toad.
Related…
The SNL Star Who MOCKED Navy SEAL Hero Is Now Being Helped By Him
BOOM! Wounded Navy SEAL, Who Was Ridiculed By SNL Punk, Just Got The LAST LAUGH
Oops: SNL Accidentally Turns Vet They Tried To Mock … Into A Sex Symbol
War Hero Gets Labeled A NAZI – His Response Is PURE GOLD


clashdaily--2020-02-27--Dear Bernie: Did You Know That Those ‘Cheap’ Diabetes Drugs In Canada Have Been Recalled — Here’s Th

Dear Bernie: Did You Know That Those ‘Cheap’ Diabetes Drugs In Canada Have Been Recalled — Here’s The 411

Before you get super-excited about those plans about buying cheap drugs from other Western Countries , you might want to consider the downside .
There ’ s an old maxim , ‘ you get what you pay for ’ .
Basically , it says if you are paying cut-rate for your drugs , there ’ s probably a good reason they cost less .
Now , it MIGHT be a question of price gouging .
Human nature being what it is , that ’ s a possibility .
But there ’ s another possibility on the cheaper end that people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Trending : FAKE NEWS ON NOTICE : The NY Times Just Got Some BAD News — The Trump Campaign Files A Libel Lawsuit Are they cutting corners on the el-cheapo version ?
The short answer is… yes , they are .
And patients are paying a price .
Bernie loves to talk about how much cheaper drugs are in Canada , right ?
Well , let ’ s see an enterprising journalist ask him about this : Health Canada has expanded a national recall for certain types of diabetes medications due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drugs could be linked to cancer .
The recall , issued Wednesday , is for certain brands of drugs containing metformin , which is prescribed to some patients with Type 2 diabetes to help control their blood sugar levels .
The recalled medications contain alarmingly high levels of an organic compound called N-nitrosodimethylamine , or NDMA .
The compound is safe when ingested in small doses over a lifetime , but studies have shown that it is potentially carcinogenic above a certain threshold .
The new recall includes six lots of the RAN-Metformin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc .
Earlier this month , Health Canada issued a similar recall for eight lots of APO-Metformin ER tablets , sold in 500 milligram tablets by Apotex Inc. — Source : CTV American supplies were tested for contamination with this same carcinogen .
The FDA says it has no plans to recall any metformin products , used to treat type 2 diabetes , after tests did not show any evidence of contamination with N-nitrosodimethylamine ( NDMA ) at levels that would cause concern .
The FDA began testing samples @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the end of last year .
Contamination with this substance has led to recalls of blood pressure and heartburn medications within the past 2 years .
That announcement came on the heels of a recall of three versions of metformin in Singapore and the European Medicines Agency ’ s request that drugmakers test for NDMA .
— Source : WebMD

Before you get super-excited about those plans about buying cheap drugs from other Western Countries, you might want to consider the downside.
There’s an old maxim, ‘you get what you pay for’.
Basically, it says if you are paying cut-rate for your drugs, there’s probably a good reason they cost less.
Now, it MIGHT be a question of price gouging. Human nature being what it is, that’s a possibility. But there’s another possibility on the cheaper end that people don’t always take into consideration.
Are they cutting corners on the el-cheapo version?
The short answer is… yes, they are. And patients are paying a price.
Bernie loves to talk about how much cheaper drugs are in Canada, right? Well, let’s see an enterprising journalist ask him about this:
Health Canada has expanded a national recall for certain types of diabetes medications due to concerns that an impurity in the prescription drugs could be linked to cancer.
The recall, issued Wednesday, is for certain brands of drugs containing metformin, which is prescribed to some patients with Type 2 diabetes to help control their blood sugar levels.
The recalled medications contain alarmingly high levels of an organic compound called N-nitrosodimethylamine, or NDMA. The compound is safe when ingested in small doses over a lifetime, but studies have shown that it is potentially carcinogenic above a certain threshold.
The new recall includes six lots of the RAN-Metformin drug, sold in 500 milligram tablets by Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. Earlier this month, Health Canada issued a similar recall for eight lots of APO-Metformin ER tablets, sold in 500 milligram tablets by Apotex Inc. — Source: CTV
American supplies were tested for contamination with this same carcinogen.
The FDA says it has no plans to recall any metformin products, used to treat type 2 diabetes, after tests did not show any evidence of contamination with N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) at levels that would cause concern.
The FDA began testing samples of metformin for the carcinogen NDMA at the end of last year. Contamination with this substance has led to recalls of blood pressure and heartburn medications within the past 2 years.
That announcement came on the heels of a recall of three versions of metformin in Singapore and the European Medicines Agency’s request that drugmakers test for NDMA. — Source: WebMD


clashdaily--2020-02-26--CLASH POLL: Which Was The WORST Flub From The Democratic Debate? (VIDEO)

The Democrat Hopefuls beclowned themselves in South Carolina .
Here ’ s the worst of the worst… The Democratic Debate in South Carolina simultaneously completely chaotic as well as an absolute snorefest — which is quite the feat .
The candidates vying for who will be trounced by President Trump in November managed to create even more of a spectacle of themselves than usual .
The debate was filled with horrible flubs , slips , gaffes , lunacy , and outright racism .
We want to know what you think the worst moment was .
Former Vice President Joe Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ completely sure where he was , ) stating that half of the population of the United States was killed by gun violence : Senator Elizabeth Warren accidentally admitting that unborn babies are alive while she lies about being fired from her teaching job for being “ visibly pregnant.
” Peter Pander getting “ woke ” on racial discrimination while ignoring Liz Warren ’ s self-defined Native American identity : Speaking of woke pandering , Tom Steyer voluntarily brings up reparations to “ retell ” the story of discrimination against African-Americans .
Mini-Mike letting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election .
Bernie saying that Black , Hispanic , and Native American people should start businesses to sell marijuana legally .
I guess we ’ re supposed to leave all the weed-selling to minorities — but that ’ s not racist , it ’ s “ progressive ” and compassionate .
It was clearly a win for President Trump because of all of the chaos : But whose gaffe was the worst ?

The Democrat Hopefuls beclowned themselves in South Carolina. Here’s the worst of the worst…
The Democratic Debate in South Carolina simultaneously completely chaotic as well as an absolute snorefest — which is quite the feat.
The candidates vying for who will be trounced by President Trump in November managed to create even more of a spectacle of themselves than usual. The debate was filled with horrible flubs, slips, gaffes, lunacy, and outright racism.
We want to know what you think the worst moment was.
Biden
Former Vice President Joe Biden, (who may not have been completely sure where he was,) stating that half of the population of the United States was killed by gun violence:
BIDEN: "150 million people" have been killed by gun violence since 2007. What Joe? pic.twitter.com/vEude5IMIj — Benny (@bennyjohnson) February 26, 2020
Klobuchar
Senator Amy Klobuchar’s alleged F-bomb:
(It should be noted that Klobuchar said that she didn’t swear but was saying “Margaret” which is the name of one of the moderators.)
Warren
Senator Elizabeth Warren accidentally admitting that unborn babies are alive while she lies about being fired from her teaching job for being “visibly pregnant.”
Elizabeth Warren again repeated the story of claiming to be fired for being pregnant during tonight's #DemDebate, despite video of her saying otherwise. #DemDebate2020 pic.twitter.com/6c0lB3Qdn5 — MRCTV.org (@mrctv) February 26, 2020
Buttigieg
Peter Pander getting “woke” on racial discrimination while ignoring Liz Warren’s self-defined Native American identity:
No one on this stage has had the experience of being dismissed or considered a threat because of the color of our skin. That’s why we need leaders who will listen to those who have. #DemDebate pic.twitter.com/vfmZ43fuZI — Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) February 26, 2020
Steyer
Speaking of woke pandering, Tom Steyer voluntarily brings up reparations to “retell” the story of discrimination against African-Americans.
.@TomSteyer calls for reparations for slavery and a formal commission on race that will “retell” the story of “systematic, legal injustice, discrimination and cruelty” against African-Americans through U.S. history #DemDebate https://t.co/nLka6l2vw9 pic.twitter.com/10L0W66M6B — CBS News (@CBSNews) February 26, 2020
Bloomberg
Mini-Mike letting it slip that he bought the 2018 election.
Michael Bloomberg actually just said that he bought 21 seats in Congress for the Democratic Party so that Nancy Pelosi would be Speaker of the House. He really said that out loud. According to him: Democrats BOUGHT their house majority in 2018. #DemDebate pic.twitter.com/1IdxV5ifFH — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) February 26, 2020
Sanders
Senator Bernie Sanders calling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a racist:
If elected, Bernie Sanders would be the first Jewish person to become U.S. president. He would also be the first Democratic nominee to call Israel’s leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, a racist. Catch up with key moments from the 10th #DemDebate: https://t.co/lwLYZltxnB pic.twitter.com/gH1uxE7Jbk — POLITICO (@politico) February 26, 2020
BONUS
Bernie saying that Black, Hispanic, and Native American people should start businesses to sell marijuana legally. I guess we’re supposed to leave all the weed-selling to minorities — but that’s not racist, it’s “progressive” and compassionate.
Socialist Bernie Sanders says he wants to help minorities start businesses to sell drugs pic.twitter.com/C4dVQ3lCAH — Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) February 26, 2020
It was clearly a win for President Trump because of all of the chaos:
It doesn’t matter who emerges from the chaos and the carnage. President Trump will dominate in November.https://t.co/5t6Uk1uuVz #DemDebate pic.twitter.com/zzIQTKdSsd — Trump War Room – Text WOKE to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) February 26, 2020
But whose gaffe was the worst?


clashdaily--2020-02-26--MEME OF THE DAY: In Honor Of President Trump’s Successful India Trip, Here’s ‘Peshwa Warrior Trump’

MEME OF THE DAY: In Honor Of President Trump’s Successful India Trip, Here’s ‘Peshwa Warrior Trump’ (VIDEO)

The pro-Trump meme-makers are supremely talented and here at ClashDaily , we want to honor them .
We love this stuff , and we ’ ll bet our readers do , too .
From Carpe Donktum to Power Tie and Mad Liberals to Sol , you ’ ve all made us laugh and cheer with your creativity and excellence .
You get that MAGA message out there with your videos and it ’ s pretty amazing stuff .
In honor of President Trump ’ s recent visit to India , here ’ s one of those incredible memes portraying our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This isn ’ t the only Bollywood Trump meme , and there ’ s something about the Bollywood visuals and Trump that just… works .
The President himself liked that last one and retweeted it .
How did the actual visit go ?
Well , here are a couple videos to sum it up : Here is Prime Minister Modi welcoming President Trump and the friendship between India and the United States .
It looks like President Trump isn ’ t the international embarrassment that the Democrats claim that he is and that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

The pro-Trump meme-makers are supremely talented and here at ClashDaily, we want to honor them.
We love this stuff, and we’ll bet our readers do, too.
From Carpe Donktum to Power Tie and Mad Liberals to Sol, you’ve all made us laugh and cheer with your creativity and excellence. You get that MAGA message out there with your videos and it’s pretty amazing stuff.
Meme on, meme warriors, meme on!
In honor of President Trump’s recent visit to India, here’s one of those incredible memes portraying our amazing President as a dancing hero.
This isn’t the only Bollywood Trump meme, and there’s something about the Bollywood visuals and Trump that just… works.
The hero will destroy the evil and we will make America great again! pic.twitter.com/lrXgp198ji — Sol ? (@Solmemes1) January 23, 2020
To celebrate Trump's visit to India I wanted to make a video to show how in my warped mind it will go…… USA and India united! pic.twitter.com/uuPWNRZjk4 — Sol ? (@Solmemes1) February 22, 2020
The President himself liked that last one and retweeted it.
Look so forward to being with my great friends in INDIA! https://t.co/1jdk3AW6fG — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 22, 2020
How did the actual visit go?
Well, here are a couple videos to sum it up:
Trump just filled the world's largest cricket stadium with over 100,000 people in India. Their reaction as he entered tells you everything you need to know: pic.twitter.com/ixk7bc2tfh — The First (@TheFirstonTV) February 24, 2020
Here is Prime Minister Modi welcoming President Trump and the friendship between India and the United States.
India & America Unite! 125,000+ patriots in white Trump hats at Motera stadium erupted in huge cheer to welcome Trump as #NamasteTrump reverberates all around Leftist media and radicals underestimated our country's friendship, bond & partnership in fighting evil.#TrumpInIndia pic.twitter.com/YUtN6mRtdE — Amy Mek (@AmyMek) February 24, 2020
It looks like President Trump isn’t the international embarrassment that the Democrats claim that he is and that he isn’t despised in India.
Good to know.


clashdaily--2020-02-26--Project Veritas: ABC Staffer Tells Truth About  Network, Gets Suspended

The fact that he calls himself a Socialist isn ’ t even the most newsworthy detail about this expose .
It ’ s what he ’ s saying about the network itself .
Project Veritas has released a ‘ teaser ’ about a video that will drop tomorrow .
Their latest undercover work is talking about what ’ s really going on in ABC .
Part of the interview included thoughts on just how committed they are to releasing stories of real interest to the public or spiking them if they don ’ t tell the ‘ right ’ narrative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this same network was when Project Veritas exposed a story about ABC knowing about Epstein but refusing to run the confirmed story they had on him .
Rather than take action about that , they went about colluding with a rival network to get an innocent patsy fired .
— ABC Continues Hunt For Amy Robach ‘ Leaker ’ After Getting Young Woman Fired From CBS Here ’ s David Wright in his own words… So… what ’ s new this time ?
Here are some key takeaways : — When asked if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he said ‘ I consider myself a socialist ’ .
— ‘ our bosses don ’ t see an upside in doing the job we ’ re supposed to do , which is to speak truth to power and hold people to account ’ — ( in context of an erroneous story about all of Kobe ’ s daughters being part of the crash , and a guy getting suspended for it ) — ‘ Fake News abounds , there are problems with the truth these days ’ — We don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t give him credit for the things he DOES do – ‘ you can ’ t watch Good Morining America without there being a Disney Princess or a Marvel Avenger appearing.
’ — it ’ s all promotion – of the company – of individuals within the company How well are they able to balance those competing agendas of commercial profit and reporting ?
— I don ’ t think we ’ re terribly interested in the voters Is this attitude unique to ABC ?
— ‘ We ’ re all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think that all these big news organizations , again I ’ m speaking about broadcast television ABC , CBS , NBC .
And we recognize that we are dinosaurs , and we ’ re in danger of dying .
We ’ re not disciplined enough to cut ( Trump ) off , and we second-guess ourselves .
Because we ’ re sensitive to the accusation that , you know , we ’ re in the tank for the Democrats.
’ There ’ s already been fallout from this interview .
Here come the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It Stayed In The System ’ — Was The Wrong Employee Fired For Leaking Robach ’ s ‘ Hot Mic ’ Epstein Rant ?

The fact that he calls himself a Socialist isn’t even the most newsworthy detail about this expose. It’s what he’s saying about the network itself.
Project Veritas has released a ‘teaser’ about a video that will drop tomorrow.
Their latest undercover work is talking about what’s really going on in ABC.
Part of the interview included thoughts on just how committed they are to releasing stories of real interest to the public or spiking them if they don’t tell the ‘right’ narrative.
You might recall how worked up this same network was when Project Veritas exposed a story about ABC knowing about Epstein but refusing to run the confirmed story they had on him.
Rather than take action about that, they went about colluding with a rival network to get an innocent patsy fired. — ABC Continues Hunt For Amy Robach ‘Leaker’ After Getting Young Woman Fired From CBS
Here’s David Wright in his own words…
Tweets by JamesOKeefeIII
So… what’s new this time? Here are some key takeaways:
About himself…
— When asked if he’s a Democratic Socialist, he said ‘I consider myself a socialist’.
About his network…
— ‘The Truth suffers’
— ‘the voters are poorly informed’
— ‘our bosses don’t see an upside in doing the job we’re supposed to do, which is to speak truth to power and hold people to account’
— (in context of an erroneous story about all of Kobe’s daughters being part of the crash, and a guy getting suspended for it) — ‘Fake News abounds, there are problems with the truth these days’
About Trump…
— We don’t hold him to account. We also don’t give him credit for the things he DOES do
About their agenda…
–It became a profit center
–‘you can’t watch Good Morining America without there being a Disney Princess or a Marvel Avenger appearing.’
— it’s all promotion
– of the company
– of individuals within the company
How well are they able to balance those competing agendas of commercial profit and reporting?
— ‘The commercial imperative is incompatible with news’
About the audience…
— I don’t think we’re terribly interested in the voters
Is this attitude unique to ABC?
— ‘We’re all guilty of the same thing. I think that all these big news organizations, again I’m speaking about broadcast television ABC, CBS, NBC. And we recognize that we are dinosaurs, and we’re in danger of dying. We’re not disciplined enough to cut (Trump) off, and we second-guess ourselves. Because we’re sensitive to the accusation that, you know, we’re in the tank for the Democrats.’
There’s already been fallout from this interview.
Suspended for being honest: “David Wright has been suspended, and to avoid any possible appearance of bias, he will be reassigned away from political coverage when he returns.” – ABC NEWS. https://t.co/sEgKHCSbIL — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) February 26, 2020
Is ABC News going to suspend half their news division? (most journalists say these things in private) or just the ones caught saying these things? We commend him for his honesty. We do wish they’d say these things publicly, on the air. https://t.co/p9qnZJRIeR — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) February 26, 2020
Here come the defenders of the establishment status quo…
Charles Seife, journalism professor @nyuniversity . Pray tell what is unethical about our tactics for getting people to open up. We simply report, with precision, what the public has a right to know the person said. Thread below on this. 1/4 @cgseife @farhip https://t.co/CtorV8bPRy — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) February 26, 2020
It’s ‘damaging’ by reporting what subjects says in THEIR OWN WORDS. Isn’t that the duty of a journalist, @cgseif of NYU JOURNALISM SCHOOL? Are your students only taught to use or not use quotes depending on whether those quotes are “damaging?’ Does TRUTH come in the equation? https://t.co/Z8eSOpbKIG — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) February 26, 2020
Related…
PROJECT VERITAS: ABC News Anchor Claims Higher-Ups Spiked Her Detailed Expose On Epstein (Video)
‘It Stayed In The System’ — Was The Wrong Employee Fired For Leaking Robach’s ‘Hot Mic’ Epstein Rant?