clashdaily--2020-05-07--This News BigWig Just Gave The Game Away: ‘I Don’t Want Justice. I Want A Win.’

Why do we call them fake news ?
Because they ’ re partisan hacks that embellish or lie to hurt their opponents , and cover up embarrassments to help their friends .
In other words , they will deliberately mislead the public so that their guy has a shot at willing .
And the founder of one of the ‘ respectable ’ news outlets openly admitted it .
Trending : PROJECT VERITAS : Here ’ s Why NY Funeral Homes Are Calling BS On COVID Stats ( Video ) In a letter to the Editor in the New York Times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ later ) explained exactly what his political agenda is .
Here is his letter , verbatim .
“ I totally disagree with this article .
I don ’ t want an investigation .
I want a coronation of Joe Biden .
Would he make a great president ?
Unlikely .
Would he make a good president ?
Good enough .
Would he make a better president than the current occupant ?
Absolutely .
I don ’ t want justice , whatever that may be .
I want a win , the removal of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden is our best chance .
Suppose an investigation reveals damaging information concerning his relationship with Tara Reade or something else , and Mr. Biden loses the nomination to Senator Bernie Sanders or someone else with a minimal chance of defeating Mr. Trump .
Should we really risk that possibility ?
Martin Tolchin , Alexandria , Va .
The writer is a former member of The Times Washington Bureau , and founder of Politico .
Were you wondering what he was responding to ?
It was this piece : The Times column to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Democratic National Committee to investigate the allegation by Tara Reade , a former Senate staffer who accused then-Sen. Biden of pinning her against a wall and digitally penetrating her without her consent in his Senate office in 1993 .
At least six people have corroborated parts of Ms. Reade ’ s story since she spoke out in March .
—Times He ’ s a hack .
A Democrat that only makes a pretense of being ‘ caring ’ ; about being a ‘ champion of justice ’ that the Left pretends to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ explicitly does NOT care about whether or not Tara Reade was assaulted by his preferred candidate .
Tolchin broke it down to what really drives him : a naked political power grab .
As though we haven ’ t seen right through them all along .
As though this isn ’ t PRECISELY what we mean when we mock you as ‘ Fake News ’ .
In his paradigm , Tara Reade is nothing more than expendable fodder .
Merely a pawn in a greater game .
The Georgetowner has this little gem @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nonagenarian founder of Politico : Given the sorry statistics facing journalism today , one wonders about the future of that pantheon , considering the Gallup poll Tolchin cites that shows Americans ’ trust in journalism has fallen since 1976 , when it was at an all-time high of 76 percent , to an all-time low of 32 percent .
Tolchin doesn ’ t analyze what happened in those four decades to cause Americans to lose trust in the media , but he reports an eye-popping political cleavage : the level of trust in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 42 percent for Independents and 21 percent for Republicans .
—Georgetowner Gee , if only there were some sort of a clue as to what causes such ‘ political cleavage ’ .
Perhaps one could be found in the New York Times… check the Editorial pages .

Why do we call them fake news? Because they’re partisan hacks that embellish or lie to hurt their opponents, and cover up embarrassments to help their friends.
In other words, they will deliberately mislead the public so that their guy has a shot at willing.
And the founder of one of the ‘respectable’ news outlets openly admitted it.
Frame it and hang it on a wall. pic.twitter.com/QeBH2P9jnT — Guy Benson (@guypbenson) May 5, 2020
In a letter to the Editor in the New York Times, Martin Tolchin (more on him later) explained exactly what his political agenda is. Here is his letter, verbatim.
To the Editor: “I totally disagree with this article. I don’t want an investigation. I want a coronation of Joe Biden. Would he make a great president? Unlikely. Would he make a good president? Good enough. Would he make a better president than the current occupant? Absolutely. I don’t want justice, whatever that may be. I want a win, the removal of Donald Trump from office, and Mr. Biden is our best chance. Suppose an investigation reveals damaging information concerning his relationship with Tara Reade or something else, and Mr. Biden loses the nomination to Senator Bernie Sanders or someone else with a minimal chance of defeating Mr. Trump. Should we really risk that possibility? Martin Tolchin,
Alexandria, Va.
The writer is a former member of The Times Washington Bureau, and founder of Politico.
Were you wondering what he was responding to? It was this piece:
The Times column to which Mr. Tolchin was responding called on the Democratic National Committee to investigate the allegation by Tara Reade, a former Senate staffer who accused then-Sen. Biden of pinning her against a wall and digitally penetrating her without her consent in his Senate office in 1993. At least six people have corroborated parts of Ms. Reade’s story since she spoke out in March. —Times
He’s a hack. A Democrat that only makes a pretense of being ‘caring’; about being a ‘champion of justice’ that the Left pretends to identify as. In fact, he explicitly does NOT care about whether or not Tara Reade was assaulted by his preferred candidate.
Tolchin broke it down to what really drives him: a naked political power grab. As though we haven’t seen right through them all along. As though this isn’t PRECISELY what we mean when we mock you as ‘Fake News’.
In his paradigm, Tara Reade is nothing more than expendable fodder. Merely a pawn in a greater game.
The Georgetowner has this little gem in a brief biographical article about the nonagenarian founder of Politico:
Given the sorry statistics facing journalism today, one wonders about the future of that pantheon, considering the Gallup poll Tolchin cites that shows Americans’ trust in journalism has fallen since 1976, when it was at an all-time high of 76 percent, to an all-time low of 32 percent. Tolchin doesn’t analyze what happened in those four decades to cause Americans to lose trust in the media, but he reports an eye-popping political cleavage: the level of trust in the press is 76 percent for Democrats, 42 percent for Independents and 21 percent for Republicans. —Georgetowner
Gee, if only there were some sort of a clue as to what causes such ‘political cleavage’.
Perhaps one could be found in the New York Times… check the Editorial pages.


clashdaily--2020-05-07--Illinois Governor Puts SEVERE Restrictions On Churches Saying That They May Not Open Up For A Year O

Illinois Governor Puts SEVERE Restrictions On Churches Saying That They May Not Open Up For A Year Or More

I guess that means we ’ ll have to see you in court , Governor !
This is precisely the Bull**t that AG Barr told us he was intending to guard against .
Sorry to break it to you , bonehead , but freedom of worship is not a favor granted to citizens by overlords in a gracious and benevolent government if and when they think we deserve it .
It is an inherent right .
Trending : PROJECT VERITAS : Here ’ s Why NY Funeral Homes Are Calling BS On COVID Stats ( Video ) It is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the State .
Because it wasn ’ t granted by the State , the state does not have the authority to revoke it .
It is , to borrow the phrase Obama once used to dodge responsibility , ‘ above your paygrade ’ .
That being said , what is it Governor Pritzker THINKS he can impose upon a free people ?
Pritzker announced a five-phase plan to reopen Illinois that gives guidance to schools , businesses , churches , and other religious centers about when they will be allowed to reopen .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 10 people will be allowed .
In phase four , gatherings of up to 50 people will be allowed .
Gatherings of more than 50 people will not be allowed until phase five .
During a press conference on Wednesday , Pritzker confirmed that churches will be held to the same standards and not be allowed to hold in-person services of more than 50 people until phase five , even if it takes more than a year to get to that position .
“ You know , that in phase three , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , of 10 or fewer .
In phase four , 50 or fewer .
So that ’ s the guidance that ’ s been given to me , ” Pritzker said .
“ I ’ m not the one providing that guidance .
It really is what the scientists and epidemiologists are recommending.
” …Phase five can not begin until a vaccine is widely available or a highly effective therapeutic drug is released .
Dr. Anthony Fauci , the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , has said a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from being available to the public .
— WashingtonExaminer This is the same guy whose wife hopped a private plane to their other home in Florida ( because she could ) , while the rest of us poor plebs were ordered to ‘ shelter in place ’ .
It is no secret that religious institutions are one of the greatest obstacles to the Progressive and Marxist cultural agenda .
This looks more than a little like they are ( knowingly or not ) taking a union-busting principle to your great enemy , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they say , in about thirty days .
This ruling is forcibly creating a new habit — for perhaps more than a year — of NON-participation in religious activities .
Not only would this spell , on a practical level , the ruination of many churches , and the end of any charitable work they provide , but it is something worse .
It is a corrosive weakening of the corporate bonds of the people in those churches .
And for what ?
Cuomo has already shown us data that Sheltering in place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people from disease exposure , but that the vast majority of hospitalizations are from people who complied with the Chicken Little strategy .
What , exactly is putting our lives on hold for another year going to accomplish ?
To use a relevant example , even WITH a vaccine , we have tens of thousands of deaths due to the Flu every year .
At least twice in the last decade we had deaths similar to or greater than the entire Vietnam War… and nobody batted an eye .
But this one is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and hide until somebody gives us the all-clear ?
You can hide if you like .
But more and more Americans are done with running scared .
They ’ re not waiting for permission from government officials , they ’ re taking their lives back .

I guess that means we’ll have to see you in court, Governor!
This is precisely the Bull**t that AG Barr told us he was intending to guard against.
Sorry to break it to you, bonehead, but freedom of worship is not a favor granted to citizens by overlords in a gracious and benevolent government if and when they think we deserve it.
It is an inherent right.
It is a right derived from GOD not granted by the State. Because it wasn’t granted by the State, the state does not have the authority to revoke it. It is, to borrow the phrase Obama once used to dodge responsibility, ‘above your paygrade’.
That being said, what is it Governor Pritzker THINKS he can impose upon a free people?
Pritzker announced a five-phase plan to reopen Illinois that gives guidance to schools, businesses, churches, and other religious centers about when they will be allowed to reopen. In phase three, gatherings of up to 10 people will be allowed. In phase four, gatherings of up to 50 people will be allowed. Gatherings of more than 50 people will not be allowed until phase five. During a press conference on Wednesday, Pritzker confirmed that churches will be held to the same standards and not be allowed to hold in-person services of more than 50 people until phase five, even if it takes more than a year to get to that position. “You know, that in phase three, there can be gatherings, church gatherings, of 10 or fewer. In phase four, 50 or fewer. So that’s the guidance that’s been given to me,” Pritzker said. “I’m not the one providing that guidance. It really is what the scientists and epidemiologists are recommending.” …Phase five cannot begin until a vaccine is widely available or a highly effective therapeutic drug is released. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has said a vaccine is 12 to 18 months away from being available to the public. — WashingtonExaminer
This is the same guy whose wife hopped a private plane to their other home in Florida (because she could), while the rest of us poor plebs were ordered to ‘shelter in place’.
It is no secret that religious institutions are one of the greatest obstacles to the Progressive and Marxist cultural agenda. This looks more than a little like they are (knowingly or not) taking a union-busting principle to your great enemy, the Church.
New habits are formed, they say, in about thirty days.
This ruling is forcibly creating a new habit — for perhaps more than a year — of NON-participation in religious activities.
Not only would this spell, on a practical level, the ruination of many churches, and the end of any charitable work they provide, but it is something worse. It is a corrosive weakening of the corporate bonds of the people in those churches.
And for what? Cuomo has already shown us data that Sheltering in place isn’t just failing to protect people from disease exposure, but that the vast majority of hospitalizations are from people who complied with the Chicken Little strategy.
What, exactly is putting our lives on hold for another year going to accomplish?
To use a relevant example, even WITH a vaccine, we have tens of thousands of deaths due to the Flu every year. At least twice in the last decade we had deaths similar to or greater than the entire Vietnam War… and nobody batted an eye.
But this one is special, and we should all run and hide until somebody gives us the all-clear?
You can hide if you like. But more and more Americans are done with running scared.
They’re not waiting for permission from government officials, they’re taking their lives back.


clashdaily--2020-05-07--WATCH: White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany Torches The Fake News Media(D)

The White House Press corps wanted the truth… but can they HANDLE the truth ?
The newly-minted Press Secretary was asked in a *gotcha* question last week if she would tell the truth .
This week , they got more truth than they bargained for .
Kayleigh McEnany got exactly the kind of questions you might expect her to have gotten from this toxic crowd .
Questions designed not to elicit information , but to embarrass the President ’ s administration , and to put their performance through this crisis in the worst possible light We all knew it was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they took their partisan jabs .
Trending : PROJECT VERITAS : Here ’ s Why NY Funeral Homes Are Calling BS On COVID Stats ( Video ) What was NOT anticipated by many observers , however , was just how effectively this new PresSec could jab back when hit with disingenuous questions .
Not only did she do a fantastic job in age-old dance of dodge , parry , and counterstrike that comprises the interplay between Press Secretary and hostile press .
But she did more than that .
When the media tried @ @ @ @ @ @ @ news in her face , she was ready for it .
She didn ’ t have to raise her voice , or get aggressive .
She just presented facts and ran them — all of them — through a collective buzzsaw .
If you ’ re going to look for ways to use what the President said in early days while the situation was still developing , be sure that what your own outlets said at the same time is fair game .
And however embarrassing you thinking the ‘ gotcha ’ question @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of your OWN positions make you look like the absolute clowns you are .
We ’ ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with a less than stellar past , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

The White House Press corps wanted the truth… but can they HANDLE the truth?
The newly-minted Press Secretary was asked in a *gotcha* question last week if she would tell the truth. This week, they got more truth than they bargained for.
Kayleigh McEnany got exactly the kind of questions you might expect her to have gotten from this toxic crowd. Questions designed not to elicit information, but to embarrass the President’s administration, and to put their performance through this crisis in the worst possible light
We all knew it was coming. And just like clockwork, they took their partisan jabs.
What was NOT anticipated by many observers, however, was just how effectively this new PresSec could jab back when hit with disingenuous questions.
Not only did she do a fantastic job in age-old dance of dodge, parry, and counterstrike that comprises the interplay between Press Secretary and hostile press.
But she did more than that.
When the media tried to spring a trap by throwing old news in her face, she was ready for it.
This is amazing???. Watch WH Press Sec @kayleighmcenany torch fake news media outlets on their BS propaganda and fake news “reporting.” pic.twitter.com/TTWQIZswQq — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) May 6, 2020
She didn’t have to raise her voice, or get aggressive. She just presented facts and ran them — all of them — through a collective buzzsaw.
If you’re going to look for ways to use what the President said in early days while the situation was still developing, be sure that what your own outlets said at the same time is fair game.
And however embarrassing you thinking the ‘gotcha’ question might be for the President, some of your OWN positions make you look like the absolute clowns you are.
Your move, Press Corps…
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-05-07--END THE LOCKDOWN: Cuomo ‘Shocked’ That 84% Of NYC Hospitalizations For COVID Were People Sheltering

END THE LOCKDOWN: Cuomo ‘Shocked’ That 84% Of NYC Hospitalizations For COVID Were People Sheltering In Place

The ‘ experts ’ assured us the silver bullet that would save us from the Viral Menace was sacrificing our economy on the altar of safety and retreating into our homes until the danger passed .
They were wrong .
And an untold number of families have been ruined , never to recover … for nothing .
The silver bullet touted by talking heads on TV , that all ‘ good and moral citizens ’ relied upon was a dud .
Skeptics were shamed .
Called immoral .
One was personally derided by a judge as ‘ selfish ’ and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being fined $ 7000 a day .
Trending : PROJECT VERITAS : Here ’ s Why NY Funeral Homes Are Calling BS On COVID Stats ( Video ) The silver bullet wasn ’ t just wrong– it was DANGEROUSLY wrong .
People who obeyed the shelter-in-place guidelines were put at higher risk than those who did not .
During a recent press conference , Cuomo cited a study that left him gobsmacked.. “ If you notice , 18 % of the people came from nursing homes , less than 1 % came from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the homeless population , 2 % from other congregate facilities , but 66 % of the people were at home , which is shocking to us , ” the Democrat said during a televised COVID-19 briefing on Wednesday .
“ This is a surprise : Overwhelmingly , the people were at home , ” Cuomo continued .
“ We thought maybe they were taking public transportation , and we ’ ve taken special precautions on public transportation , but actually no , because these people were literally at home.
” “ Cuomo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cases were people who were not commuting to work through car services , personal cars , public transit or walking , ” CNBC noted , adding that the governor “ said the information shows that those who are hospitalized are predominantly from the downstate area in or around New York City , are not working or traveling , and are not essential employees.
” — DailyWire A little more about that study… The preliminary data was from 100 New York hospitals involving about 1,000 patients , Cuomo said at his daily briefing .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ expect that anyone NOT abiding by all the shelter-in-place requirements will be heartless morons with blood on our hands… or something .
Because unlike the rest of us Liberal never have to be judged by their results… only by their intentions .

The ‘experts’ assured us the silver bullet that would save us from the Viral Menace was sacrificing our economy on the altar of safety and retreating into our homes until the danger passed.
They were wrong. And an untold number of families have been ruined, never to recover … for nothing. The silver bullet touted by talking heads on TV, that all ‘good and moral citizens’ relied upon was a dud.
Skeptics were shamed. Called immoral. One was personally derided by a judge as ‘selfish’ and thrown in jail for a week after being fined $7000 a day.
For what?
The silver bullet wasn’t just wrong– it was DANGEROUSLY wrong. People who obeyed the shelter-in-place guidelines were put at higher risk than those who did not.
During a recent press conference, Cuomo cited a study that left him gobsmacked..
“If you notice, 18% of the people came from nursing homes, less than 1% came from jail or prison, 2% came from the homeless population, 2% from other congregate facilities, but 66% of the people were at home, which is shocking to us,” the Democrat said during a televised COVID-19 briefing on Wednesday. “This is a surprise: Overwhelmingly, the people were at home,” Cuomo continued. “We thought maybe they were taking public transportation, and we’ve taken special precautions on public transportation, but actually no, because these people were literally at home.” “Cuomo said nearly 84% of the hospitalized cases were people who were not commuting to work through car services, personal cars, public transit or walking,” CNBC noted, adding that the governor “said the information shows that those who are hospitalized are predominantly from the downstate area in or around New York City, are not working or traveling, and are not essential employees.” — DailyWire
A little more about that study…
The preliminary data was from 100 New York hospitals involving about 1,000 patients, Cuomo said at his daily briefing. — CNBC
Naturally, we can all expect that anyone NOT abiding by all the shelter-in-place requirements will be heartless morons with blood on our hands… or something.
Because unlike the rest of us Liberal never have to be judged by their results… only by their intentions.


clashdaily--2020-05-07--SCHIFF SHOW: House Intel Chair Reportedly In ‘Panic Mode’ After DNI Grenell Says ‘Release The Transc

SCHIFF SHOW: House Intel Chair Reportedly In ‘Panic Mode’ After DNI Grenell Says ‘Release The Transcripts Or I Will’

Schiff has finally met his match , someone who isn ’ t going to put up with his lawless , partisan , anticonstitutional , authoritarian bullcrap .
And there is nothing Schiff can do about it .
Schiff is a snake , and we all know it .
He ’ s been using his position in Committee to hide things that put his narrative ( and the people who have been spinning it ) in a bad light or might exonerate the political rivals he ’ s worked so VERY hard to destroy .
But now , in Richard Grenell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trending : PROJECT VERITAS : Here ’ s Why NY Funeral Homes Are Calling BS On COVID Stats ( Video ) But first , a quick recap of what got us here… Schiff has enjoyed feasting on a ridiculous amount of power in his tight little fists .
He has quite contentedly used his party ’ s majority to shield him as he weaponized his power against his enemies .
He was almost certainly the source of leaks of classified information .
He opposed Nunes releasing the truth about what was really happening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ block it , trying to demonize him in the public eye , releasing a counter-narrative memo that — eventually — was shown to be as entirely worthless as the man who wrote it , while the Nunes Memo was vindicated when investigations had run their course .
Schiff assured us that he had evidence of Russian collusion — which never materialized .
He was smack-dab in the center of the alleged ‘ whistleblower ’ conspiracy that leaked THE Ukraine Phone Call to the public , his staff flew to Ukraine before the news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ connected to Burisma .
He demanded hearing after hearing in the Russia case , putting people on the stand ( and then leaking closed meeting info to the press even before they were over .
And yet he refused to release transcripts of many of these interviews .
His role as ringmaster in the Impeachment Circus will be fodder for historians generations from now .
In particular , his ‘ parody ’ phone call fiction , his whistleblower connections with a plan to reveal him , until his own connections to him became @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leaks , while refusing to release transcripts for the hearings , even when they reportedly held testimony exculpatory to the President .
( We would argue BECAUSE it was exculpatory . )
And he forbade any witnesses in the defense of the President that were not ALSO on the Democrats ’ wish list of witnesses .
He secretly subpoenaed 1000s of phone records ( Effectively granting himself the powers of a FISA judge , under dubious authority ) and released private phone records of… among other people… journalists , political rival congressmen , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ devious , power-hungry snake .
But this snake has met his match .
If Schiff is a snake , Grenell is a mongoose .
There is a ream of documents relating to the now-completed Russia investigation that both parties , in a rare moment of bipartisanship , have agreed to release to the public .
DNI TO SCHIFF : THE TRANSCRIPTS ARE READY TO RELEASE .
A big development in the fight over 53 secret interviews the House Intelligence Committee conducted during its Trump-Russia investigation .
Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Schiff notifying him that transcripts of all 53 interviews , over 6,000 pages in all , have been cleared for public release .
“ All of the transcripts , with our required redactions , can be released to the public without any concerns of disclosing classified material , ” Grenell wrote to Schiff in a letter dated May 4 .
The Intel Committee did the first probe into Russia ’ s 2016 campaign interference and allegations of Trump-Russia collusion .
Even today , its findings make up most of what we know about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ investigation — it was run by then-majority Republicans — the committee interviewed some key witnesses in the Trump-Russia matter : Donald Trump Jr. , Steve Bannon , Andrew McCabe , Sally Yates , Michael Cohen , Hope Hicks , and many more .
…The interviews were conducted in secret .
But by September 2018 , with the committee ’ s report long finished and made public , the Republicans who still controlled the committee decided the interview transcripts should be released to the public .
In a rare moment of comity , Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2018 , the committee voted unanimously to release the transcripts .
But there was a catch : The documents would have to first be checked for classified information by the Intelligence Community .
So off they went to the IC — never to be seen again .
Now , in May 2020 , they ’ re still secret .
Two weeks ago , the Wall Street Journal editorial board reported that the IC had finished its review of 43 of the transcripts , but Schiff was refusing to release them .
The paper @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the remaining ten transcripts .
In the letter , Grenell revealed that the 43 transcripts have been finished since June 2019 .
Schiff has been sitting on them all that time .
Grenell said the final ten have just been finished as well .
“ I urge you to honor your previous public statements , and your committee ’ s unanimous vote on this matter , to release all 53 cleared transcripts to Members of Congress and the American public as soon as possible , ” Grenell said .
Just in case Schiff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ I am also willing to release the transcripts directly from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence , as to ensure we comply with the unanimous and bipartisan vote to release the transcripts.
” —WashingtonExaminer Fox reported on Shifty ’ s reaction to this development as being in ‘ panic mode ’ : Transcripts of House Intelligence Committee interviews that have been cleared for release show top law enforcement and intelligence officials affirming they had no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fox News on Wednesday .
This would align with the results of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller ’ s investigation — which found no evidence of illegal or criminal coordination between President Trump , the Trump campaign and Russia in 2016 — but the numerous transcribed interviews could raise further questions about committee Chairman Adam Schiff ’ s past statements saying that there was “ direct evidence ” of collusion .
“ Schiff is in panic mode , ” a senior administration official told Fox News .
— FoxNews What ’ s the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ haven ’ t got something you ’ re trying to HIDE , do ya ?
What with all these new developments with Flynn , Papadopoulos , Page and even the Mueller investigation… it ’ s almost like you are concerned about where exactly the breadcrumbs might lead .

Schiff has finally met his match, someone who isn’t going to put up with his lawless, partisan, anticonstitutional, authoritarian bullcrap.
And there is nothing Schiff can do about it.
Schiff is a snake, and we all know it. He’s been using his position in Committee to hide things that put his narrative (and the people who have been spinning it) in a bad light or might exonerate the political rivals he’s worked so VERY hard to destroy.
But now, in Richard Grenell, he has met his match.
But first, a quick recap of what got us here…
Schiff has enjoyed feasting on a ridiculous amount of power in his tight little fists. He has quite contentedly used his party’s majority to shield him as he weaponized his power against his enemies.
He was almost certainly the source of leaks of classified information.
He opposed Nunes releasing the truth about what was really happening in the Russia investigation, trying to block it, trying to demonize him in the public eye, releasing a counter-narrative memo that — eventually — was shown to be as entirely worthless as the man who wrote it, while the Nunes Memo was vindicated when investigations had run their course.
Schiff assured us that he had evidence of Russian collusion — which never materialized. He was smack-dab in the center of the alleged ‘whistleblower’ conspiracy that leaked THE Ukraine Phone Call to the public, his staff flew to Ukraine before the news became public, and met with people connected to Burisma.
He demanded hearing after hearing in the Russia case, putting people on the stand (and then leaking closed meeting info to the press even before they were over. And yet he refused to release transcripts of many of these interviews.
His role as ringmaster in the Impeachment Circus will be fodder for historians generations from now. In particular, his ‘parody’ phone call fiction, his whistleblower connections with a plan to reveal him, until his own connections to him became apparent. His secret hearings and selective leaks, while refusing to release transcripts for the hearings, even when they reportedly held testimony exculpatory to the President. (We would argue BECAUSE it was exculpatory.) And he forbade any witnesses in the defense of the President that were not ALSO on the Democrats’ wish list of witnesses.
He secretly subpoenaed 1000s of phone records (Effectively granting himself the powers of a FISA judge, under dubious authority) and released private phone records of… among other people… journalists, political rival congressmen, and lawyers.
He’s a devious, power-hungry snake. But this snake has met his match.
If Schiff is a snake, Grenell is a mongoose.
There is a ream of documents relating to the now-completed Russia investigation that both parties, in a rare moment of bipartisanship, have agreed to release to the public.
Schiff has been stonewalling.
DNI TO SCHIFF: THE TRANSCRIPTS ARE READY TO RELEASE. A big development in the fight over 53 secret interviews the House Intelligence Committee conducted during its Trump-Russia investigation. Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has sent a letter to chairman Adam Schiff notifying him that transcripts of all 53 interviews, over 6,000 pages in all, have been cleared for public release. “All of the transcripts, with our required redactions, can be released to the public without any concerns of disclosing classified material,” Grenell wrote to Schiff in a letter dated May 4. The Intel Committee did the first probe into Russia’s 2016 campaign interference and allegations of Trump-Russia collusion. Even today, its findings make up most of what we know about the affair. As part of that investigation — it was run by then-majority Republicans — the committee interviewed some key witnesses in the Trump-Russia matter: Donald Trump Jr., Steve Bannon, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates, Michael Cohen, Hope Hicks, and many more. …The interviews were conducted in secret. But by September 2018, with the committee’s report long finished and made public, the Republicans who still controlled the committee decided the interview transcripts should be released to the public. In a rare moment of comity, Democrats agreed, and on September 26, 2018, the committee voted unanimously to release the transcripts. But there was a catch: The documents would have to first be checked for classified information by the Intelligence Community. So off they went to the IC — never to be seen again. Now, in May 2020, they’re still secret. Two weeks ago, the Wall Street Journal editorial board reported that the IC had finished its review of 43 of the transcripts, but Schiff was refusing to release them. The paper said Schiff was also preventing declassification of the remaining ten transcripts. In the letter, Grenell revealed that the 43 transcripts have been finished since June 2019. Schiff has been sitting on them all that time. Grenell said the final ten have just been finished as well. “I urge you to honor your previous public statements, and your committee’s unanimous vote on this matter, to release all 53 cleared transcripts to Members of Congress and the American public as soon as possible,” Grenell said. Just in case Schiff is still not interested, Grenell added, “I am also willing to release the transcripts directly from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, as to ensure we comply with the unanimous and bipartisan vote to release the transcripts.” —WashingtonExaminer
Fox reported on Shifty’s reaction to this development as being in ‘panic mode’:
Transcripts of House Intelligence Committee interviews that have been cleared for release show top law enforcement and intelligence officials affirming they had no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election, senior administration and intelligence community officials told Fox News on Wednesday. This would align with the results of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation — which found no evidence of illegal or criminal coordination between President Trump, the Trump campaign and Russia in 2016 — but the numerous transcribed interviews could raise further questions about committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s past statements saying that there was “direct evidence” of collusion. “Schiff is in panic mode,” a senior administration official told Fox News. — FoxNews
What’s the matter, you little weasel?
You haven’t got something you’re trying to HIDE, do ya?
What with all these new developments with Flynn, Papadopoulos, Page and even the Mueller investigation… it’s almost like you are concerned about where exactly the breadcrumbs might lead.
Are ya getting nervous? Good.


clashdaily--2020-05-07--TRUE LEADERSHIP: Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Says He’ll Cover Salon Owner’s $7K Fine ‘So She Can Go B

TRUE LEADERSHIP: Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Says He’ll Cover Salon Owner’s $7K Fine ‘So She Can Go Back To Work And Feed Her Kids’

Instead of hiding in a comfortable bunker and calling strangers ‘ fools ’ like Cuomo is doing , Dan Patrick is showing real support and empathy for people suffering through this crisis .
How do you thread that needle when there is explicit division of powers not only between Executive , legislative , and judicial branches — but across different levels of government authority and responsibility — and yet a leader sees one of his own citizens being unjustly bludgeoned by an uncaring court ?
Sometimes , it takes an extravagant act of mercy to throw a spotlight on just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been .
You know that plucky salon owner from Dallas , Shelly Luther , who could have avoided jail and fines if she had only spoken words she didn ’ t believe to a court who really didn ’ t give a rat ’ s tuchus about the reality of her situation ?
Trending : PROJECT VERITAS : Here ’ s Why NY Funeral Homes Are Calling BS On COVID Stats ( Video ) She was sentenced for her ThoughtCrime of daring to disagree ( politely ) with the court ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Full story here : Texas Salon Owner Defies Lockdown Order Faces Fines , Jail Time–Her Response To The Judge Is PERFECTION Luther had her own ‘ Here I stand , I can do no other ’ moment , and stood ready to pay a price for it .
The Judge hit her with 7 days in jail and a fine of $ 3500 plus $ 500 per day for her disobedience .
Those who defend the Democrat judge say this about his ruling : Moyé gave her a chance to avoid jail time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ selfishly , putting her interests ahead of the community ’ s .
But she refused , saying she needed to support her family .
…Anchía said that Moyé , who he said comes from a “ working-class ” family , has deep empathy for others — especially the underdog .
“ I ’ m sure he was hoping that the owner would have taken responsibility , so that he could have allowed her to avoid jail time and simply pay a fine , but she didn ’ t want to do it , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ He was trying to apply [ the law ] fairly and with grace , and she continued to be defiant.
” Ron Kirk , the former mayor of Dallas and a friend of Moyé ’ s for 35 years , said the judge is “ as principled and courageous of a lawyer as I know.
” — DallasNews How DARE a ‘ free ’ citizen be defiant of their overlords !
In TEXAS of all places !
Not everyone shared the judge ’ s contempt for this citizen ’ s right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wednesday , [ AG ] Paxton called for the “ immediate release ” of Luther as he believed the judge was abusing his authority and that her arrest seemed like a “ political stunt.
” “ I find it outrageous and out of touch that during this national pandemic , a judge , in a county that actually released hardened criminals for fear of contracting COVID-19 , would jail a mother for operating her hair salon in an attempt to put food on her family ’ s table , ” said Attorney General @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not need to lock up Shelley Luther .
His order is a shameful abuse of judicial discretion , which seems like another political stunt in Dallas .
He should release Ms. Luther immediately.
” The attorney general sent a letter to Moye about his concerns about her arrest and sentencing .
Paxton told CBS 11 News there ’ s no action he can take beyond voicing his opinion as the state ’ s top attorney .
— DFW CBS local Gov .
Abbott agreed with the AG .
Dan Patrick went a step @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mouth is… literally .
In other words , Patrick is telling the judge to do what he thinks is required of his position , while he will proceed to do what he thinks is required of his own .
Patrick leaves the judge ’ s authority intact while using his OWN to show compassion in taking the teeth out of his ruling .
Suddenly the ‘ sending a message ’ aspect of the Judge ’ s heavy-handed punishment looks pretty foolish .
The punishment is not being ignored or rescinded .
It is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to sustain it without being destroyed .
How very… Christian… of him .
This does something else , too .
It makes the puffed-up moralizing the judge was doing from the bench look , well , like puffed up moralizing .
Apologize for being selfish… or else .
This New York-born , and Harvard-trained judge seems not to have gotten the memo yet… Texas is NOT New York or New England .
And so long as there are people like Luther and Patrick keeping that spirit alive… it never will be .

Instead of hiding in a comfortable bunker and calling strangers ‘fools’ like Cuomo is doing, Dan Patrick is showing real support and empathy for people suffering through this crisis.
How do you thread that needle when there is explicit division of powers not only between Executive, legislative, and judicial branches — but across different levels of government authority and responsibility — and yet a leader sees one of his own citizens being unjustly bludgeoned by an uncaring court?
Sometimes, it takes an extravagant act of mercy to throw a spotlight on just how unreasonable the other branches of authority have been.
You know that plucky salon owner from Dallas, Shelly Luther, who could have avoided jail and fines if she had only spoken words she didn’t believe to a court who really didn’t give a rat’s tuchus about the reality of her situation?
She was sentenced for her ThoughtCrime of daring to disagree (politely) with the court’s private moral judgment about a situation. Full story here: Texas Salon Owner Defies Lockdown Order Faces Fines, Jail Time–Her Response To The Judge Is PERFECTION
Luther had her own ‘Here I stand, I can do no other’ moment, and stood ready to pay a price for it. The Judge hit her with 7 days in jail and a fine of $3500 plus $500 per day for her disobedience.
Those who defend the Democrat judge say this about his ruling:
Moyé gave her a chance to avoid jail time by apologizing and admitting she had acted selfishly, putting her interests ahead of the community’s. But she refused, saying she needed to support her family. …Anchía said that Moyé, who he said comes from a “working-class” family, has deep empathy for others — especially the underdog. “I’m sure he was hoping that the owner would have taken responsibility, so that he could have allowed her to avoid jail time and simply pay a fine, but she didn’t want to do it,” Anchía said of the Luther case. “He was trying to apply [the law] fairly and with grace, and she continued to be defiant.” Ron Kirk, the former mayor of Dallas and a friend of Moyé’s for 35 years, said the judge is “as principled and courageous of a lawyer as I know.” — DallasNews
DEFIANT???
How DARE a ‘free’ citizen be defiant of their overlords! In TEXAS of all places!
Not everyone shared the judge’s contempt for this citizen’s right to provide for her family.
Earlier Wednesday, [AG] Paxton called for the “immediate release” of Luther as he believed the judge was abusing his authority and that her arrest seemed like a “political stunt.” “I find it outrageous and out of touch that during this national pandemic, a judge, in a county that actually released hardened criminals for fear of contracting COVID-19, would jail a mother for operating her hair salon in an attempt to put food on her family’s table,” said Attorney General Paxton. “The trial judge did not need to lock up Shelley Luther. His order is a shameful abuse of judicial discretion, which seems like another political stunt in Dallas. He should release Ms. Luther immediately.” The attorney general sent a letter to Moye about his concerns about her arrest and sentencing. Paxton told CBS 11 News there’s no action he can take beyond voicing his opinion as the state’s top attorney. — DFW CBS local
Gov. Abbott agreed with the AG. Dan Patrick went a step further and put his money where his mouth is… literally.
7 days in jail, no bail and a $7K fine is outrageous. No surprise Texans are responding. I’m covering the $7K fine she had to pay and I volunteer to be placed under House Arrest so she can go to work and feed her kids. #txlege #TexansHelpingTexans https://t.co/gdtMLAHFV5 — Dan Patrick (@DanPatrick) May 6, 2020
In other words, Patrick is telling the judge to do what he thinks is required of his position, while he will proceed to do what he thinks is required of his own.
Patrick leaves the judge’s authority intact while using his OWN to show compassion in taking the teeth out of his ruling.
Suddenly the ‘sending a message’ aspect of the Judge’s heavy-handed punishment looks pretty foolish.
The punishment is not being ignored or rescinded. It is just absorbed by someone who is able to sustain it without being destroyed.
How very… Christian… of him.
This does something else, too. It makes the puffed-up moralizing the judge was doing from the bench look, well, like puffed up moralizing.
Apologize for being selfish… or else.
This New York-born, and Harvard-trained judge seems not to have gotten the memo yet…
Texas is NOT New York or New England.
And so long as there are people like Luther and Patrick keeping that spirit alive… it never will be.


clashdaily--2020-05-07--BREAKING: Gov. Abbott Eliminates Jail Time For Violating An Order In Response To Shelley Luther Sent

BREAKING: Gov. Abbott Eliminates Jail Time For Violating An Order In Response To Shelley Luther Sentence

This is clearly the correct course of action .
In a surprise move on Thursday , Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced that he would remove jail time as a penalty for violating the stay-at-home orders .
He has made this retroactive to April 2 and it supersedes local orders .
He announced the decision on Twitter : The move comes after a Dallas salon owner , Shelley Luther , gained national attention for defying the lockdown and opening up her beauty salon so that she and her employees can earn a living .
Luther had followed public health guidelines on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sanitizer , as well as implementing rigorous cleaning and using social distancing markers on the floor to keep her customers and employees as safe as possible .
When she went to court , the judge told Luther that he would be lenient if she apologized and admitted that she was wrong in her civil disobedience .
The judge called her “ selfish ” for wanting to open up her business .
Luther responded that she was not “ selfish ” for wanting to feed her children and have her employees do the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sentence of $ 7000 and 7 days in jail for refusing to bow to the authorities .
On Wednesday , Lt. Gov .
Dan Patrick said that he ’ d pay her $ 7,000 fine and confine himself to house arrest in her place so that she could “ go back to work and feed her kids.
” Also on Wednesday , Gov .
Abbott ordered Luther ’ s release stating that jail should “ always be the last available option ” in enforcing executive orders regarding the pandemic .
“ As I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ jailing Texans for non-compliance with executive orders should always be the last available option , ” Abbott said in a statement Wednesday .
“ Compliance with executive orders during this pandemic is important to ensure public safety ; however , surely there are less restrictive means to achieving that goal than jailing a Texas mother.
” “ The defiance of the Court ’ s Order was open , flagrant and intentional , ” Judge Eric Moyé wrote Tuesday .
“ The Defendants , although having been given an opportunity to do so , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regret for their contemptuous action.
” The statewide stay-at-home order expired on April 30 , but restrictions in Dallas extend through May 15 .
• TRUE LEADERSHIP : Texas Lt. Gov .
Dan Patrick Says He ’ ll Cover Salon Owner ’ s $ 7K Fine ‘ So She Can Go Back To Work And Feed Her Kids ’ • Texas Salon Owner Defies Lockdown Order Faces Fines , Jail Time–Her Response To The Judge Is PERFECTION

This is clearly the correct course of action.
In a surprise move on Thursday, Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced that he would remove jail time as a penalty for violating the stay-at-home orders. He has made this retroactive to April 2 and it supersedes local orders.
He announced the decision on Twitter:
Throwing Texans in jail whose biz's shut down through no fault of their own is wrong. I am eliminating jail for violating an order, retroactive to April 2, superseding local orders. Criminals shouldn’t be released to prevent COVID-19 just to put business owners in their place. — Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) May 7, 2020
The move comes after a Dallas salon owner, Shelley Luther, gained national attention for defying the lockdown and opening up her beauty salon so that she and her employees can earn a living. Luther had followed public health guidelines on providing masks, gloves, and hand sanitizer, as well as implementing rigorous cleaning and using social distancing markers on the floor to keep her customers and employees as safe as possible.
When she went to court, the judge told Luther that he would be lenient if she apologized and admitted that she was wrong in her civil disobedience. The judge called her “selfish” for wanting to open up her business. Luther responded that she was not “selfish” for wanting to feed her children and have her employees do the same. She then was handed a harsh sentence of $7000 and 7 days in jail for refusing to bow to the authorities.
On Wednesday, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said that he’d pay her $7,000 fine and confine himself to house arrest in her place so that she could “go back to work and feed her kids.”
Also on Wednesday, Gov. Abbott ordered Luther’s release stating that jail should “always be the last available option” in enforcing executive orders regarding the pandemic.
“As I have made clear through prior pronouncements, jailing Texans for non-compliance with executive orders should always be the last available option,” Abbott said in a statement Wednesday. “Compliance with executive orders during this pandemic is important to ensure public safety; however, surely there are less restrictive means to achieving that goal than jailing a Texas mother.” “The defiance of the Court’s Order was open, flagrant and intentional,” Judge Eric Moyé wrote Tuesday. “The Defendants, although having been given an opportunity to do so, have expressed no contrition, remorse or regret for their contemptuous action.” The statewide stay-at-home order expired on April 30, but restrictions in Dallas extend through May 15. Source: The Hill
Release from JAIL ordered under request for emergency relief while Supreme Court considers Luther's petition. Response due by 4 p.m. Monday. — Chuck Lindell (@chucklindell) May 7, 2020
Related:


clashdaily--2020-05-07--FAKE NEWS: CBS Staged A Long Line At Michigan Coronavirus Testing Facility According To Project Veri

FAKE NEWS: CBS Staged A Long Line At Michigan Coronavirus Testing Facility According To Project Veritas Exposé

Gee , why is there so much distrust in the media ?
An insider at a Michigan medical center went to Project Veritas to expose that a fake lineup of cars at a COVID-19 testing site in Grand Rapids because CBS News This Morning was filming it for a story on the lack of testing in the state .
The insider witnessed the whole thing and went to Project Veritas .
“ The insider told us that medical personnel were taken away from treating patients and making the line longer for actual patients wait for the COVID-19 test , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Puts SEVERE Restrictions On Churches Saying That They May Not Open Up For A Year Or More In an interview with the insider , O ’ Keefe asked the insider : “ You ’ re telling me you ’ re a hundred percent certain that CBS News , CBS News Corporation–national , staged a fake event .
They faked the news .
They faked the reality and broadcasted that to all of their audience last Friday on “ CBS This Morning.
” The insider said to him : “ A hundred percent .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ cleaning site supervisor at the Cherry Health facility , said he was there when the CBS News crew arrived and set up the video shoot at the COVID-19 testing site in the parking lot , “ Apparently the news crew wanted more people in the line because they knew it was scheduled.
” Maria Hernandez-Vaquez works at Cherry Health and told the insider that it was the Director of Quality and Informatics at the facility , Glenda Walker , that assisted in organizing employees to enter the testing line .
MARIA : I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go out & drive to the tent .
PV : Did she tell you guys like , ” Hey , you ’ re not actually getting tested.
” MARIA : She did .
She said she wants to make it look busy for the news .
Some of the employees were caught on video expressing their frustration at having to leave their work to sit in a line for the cameras .
“ It ’ s just annoying cause we could have done other stuff , ” said one Registered Nurse , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had no clue that we ’ re going to have to , like , do fake patients.
” “ We pretended .
There were a couple of real patients , which made it worse , ” said another .
On a phone conversation with Project Veritas , Cherry Health President and CEO Tasha Blackmon said , “ We and CBS News had nothing to do with that line.
” Project Veritas contacted CBS News and President Susan Zirinsky agreed to review the report and issue a statement .
CBS News did not stage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Any suggestion to the contrary is 100 % false .
These allegations are alarming .
We reached out to Cherry Health to address them immediately .
They informed us for the first time that one of their chief officers told at least one staffer to get in the testing line along with real patients .
No one from CBS News had any knowledge of this before tonight .
They also said that their actions did not prevent any actual patients from being tested .
We take the accuracy of our reporting very seriously @ @ @ @ @ @ @ portion from the piece .
This isn ’ t the first time that CBS has pushed “ fake news ” there was the whole video of the “ crying nurse ” who claimed she quit her job because she wasn ’ t allowed to wear a mask that they shared on social media without any vetting .
Surprise , surprise , it turned out to be B.S .
CBS News used video from a hospital in Italy to show how overwhelmed New York hospitals were due to the coronavirus .
FAKE NEWS : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Room To Show Conditions In New York The Media ( D ) is pushing Pandemic Porn to fearmonger so that people can go to them for information and comfort only to be made more fearful… it ’ s a vicious circle .
They ’ re dealing out disinformation like a crack dealer offering the first hit free .
• called Trump racist and xenophobic for noticing that the Chinese Communist Party unleashed a global pandemic due to equal parts incompetence and pride • blasted Trump for not having enough testing , PPE , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ response to shut down the border to China was too fast • slammed his claim that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine looked “ promising ” • reported that his statements about treatment led a woman to feed her husband fish tank cleaner • reported that he thought people should “ inject household disinfectants ” like bleach and/or Lysol • said that the response to the pandemic was too slow • spread Chinese propaganda stating that the numbers of COVID-related deaths being reported are accurate • insisted that the resulting economic losses are his fault • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any death that results from opening up “ too soon ” When will it end ?
And yet… they still keep proving Trump right .

Gee, why is there so much distrust in the media?
An insider at a Michigan medical center went to Project Veritas to expose that a fake lineup of cars at a COVID-19 testing site in Grand Rapids because CBS News This Morning was filming it for a story on the lack of testing in the state.
The insider witnessed the whole thing and went to Project Veritas.
“The insider told us that medical personnel were taken away from treating patients and making the line longer for actual patients wait for the COVID-19 test,” he said. In an interview with the insider, O’Keefe asked the insider: “You’re telling me you’re a hundred percent certain that CBS News, CBS News Corporation–national, staged a fake event. They faked the news. They faked the reality and broadcasted that to all of their audience last Friday on “CBS This Morning.” The insider said to him: “A hundred percent. Absolutely.” Nick Ross, a corporate cleaning site supervisor at the Cherry Health facility, said he was there when the CBS News crew arrived and set up the video shoot at the COVID-19 testing site in the parking lot, “Apparently the news crew wanted more people in the line because they knew it was scheduled.”
Maria Hernandez-Vaquez works at Cherry Health and told the insider that it was the Director of Quality and Informatics at the facility, Glenda Walker, that assisted in organizing employees to enter the testing line.
MARIA: I assumed she was looking for volunteers to go out & drive to the tent.
PV: Did she tell you guys like,”Hey, you’re not actually getting tested.”
MARIA: Yeah
PV: Oh, OK
MARIA: She did. She said she wants to make it look busy for the news.
Some of the employees were caught on video expressing their frustration at having to leave their work to sit in a line for the cameras.
“It’s just annoying cause we could have done other stuff,” said one Registered Nurse, “We knew they were coming. We had no clue that we’re going to have to, like, do fake patients.”
“We pretended. There were a couple of real patients, which made it worse,” said another.
On a phone conversation with Project Veritas, Cherry Health President and CEO Tasha Blackmon said, “We and CBS News had nothing to do with that line.”
Project Veritas contacted CBS News and President Susan Zirinsky agreed to review the report and issue a statement.
CBS News did not stage anything at the Cherry Health facility. Any suggestion to the contrary is 100% false. These allegations are alarming. We reached out to Cherry Health to address them immediately. They informed us for the first time that one of their chief officers told at least one staffer to get in the testing line along with real patients. No one from CBS News had any knowledge of this before tonight. They also said that their actions did not prevent any actual patients from being tested. We take the accuracy of our reporting very seriously and we are removing the Cherry Health portion from the piece. Source: Project Veritas
This isn’t the first time that CBS has pushed “fake news” there was the whole video of the “crying nurse” who claimed she quit her job because she wasn’t allowed to wear a mask that they shared on social media without any vetting. Surprise, surprise, it turned out to be B.S.
CBS News used video from a hospital in Italy to show how overwhelmed New York hospitals were due to the coronavirus.
FAKE NEWS: CBS News Uses Footage Of Italian Emergency Room To Show Conditions In New York
Even Snopes pointed out CBS ran fake footage beforehttps://t.co/SdRFzEAM5X — Tim Pool (@Timcast) May 6, 2020
The Media(D) is pushing Pandemic Porn to fearmonger so that people can go to them for information and comfort only to be made more fearful… it’s a vicious circle. They’re dealing out disinformation like a crack dealer offering the first hit free.
The partisan press has:
blamed Trump for the pandemic
called Trump racist and xenophobic for noticing that the Chinese Communist Party unleashed a global pandemic due to equal parts incompetence and pride
blasted Trump for not having enough testing, PPE, ventilators, etc.
said his response to shut down the border to China was too fast
slammed his claim that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine looked “promising”
reported that his statements about treatment led a woman to feed her husband fish tank cleaner
reported that he thought people should “inject household disinfectants” like bleach and/or Lysol
mocked his musings on UV light therapy
said that the response to the pandemic was too slow
spread Chinese propaganda stating that the numbers of COVID-related deaths being reported are accurate
insisted that the resulting economic losses are his fault
insist that he’s responsible for any death that results from opening up “too soon”
faked news footage
When will it end?
And yet… they still keep proving Trump right.


clashdaily--2020-05-07--Prince Of Pussification: Harry Selling Rifle Collection Because Meghan Doesn’t Approve

He ’ s lost his title , and now he ’ s losing his guns .
All because he lost his mind over a high-maintenance chick .
It ’ s almost surprising that she let him have his wedding tackle back long enough to father a child , isn ’ t it ?
Prince Harry has reportedly sold his shooting rifle collection thought to be worth around £50,000 in a bid to please wife , Meghan Markle .
The animal-loving duchess reportedly “ doesn ’ t like ” hunting so husband Harry decided to quit the hobby .
Trending : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Saying That They May Not Open Up For A Year Or More A hunter reportedly bought a pair of the Purdey firearms five months ago , before the royal couple stepped down as senior members of the Royal Family , reports The Sun .
Meghan Markle is opposed to blood sports and even follows a vegan diet during the week – despite Harry partaking in the sport since he was a child .
—DailyStar If you ’ re wondering , fifty thousand pounds sterling works out to about $ 61,000 .
The Effeminization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Doug Giles , best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog , ClashDaily.com , has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity .
That is , if the man-child will put down his frappuccino ; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome .
Buy Now : The Effeminization Of The American Male

He’s lost his title, and now he’s losing his guns. All because he lost his mind over a high-maintenance chick.
It’s almost surprising that she let him have his wedding tackle back long enough to father a child, isn’t it?
Prince Harry has reportedly sold his shooting rifle collection thought to be worth around £50,000 in a bid to please wife, Meghan Markle. The animal-loving duchess reportedly “doesn’t like” hunting so husband Harry decided to quit the hobby. A hunter reportedly bought a pair of the Purdey firearms five months ago, before the royal couple stepped down as senior members of the Royal Family, reports The Sun. Meghan Markle is opposed to blood sports and even follows a vegan diet during the week – despite Harry partaking in the sport since he was a child. —DailyStar
If you’re wondering, fifty thousand pounds sterling works out to about $61,000.
The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now:The Effeminization Of The American Male


clashdaily--2020-05-07--Joe Biden’s Defense Of Title IX As He’s Accused Of Sexual Assault Is Hypocrisy On Steroids

Joe is doubling down on his support of the Obama-era rule that eliminated due process for the accused .
On Wednesday , Education Secretary Betsy DeVos announced new guidelines for handling complaints of sexual assault , harassment , and misconduct in K-12 schools and institutes of higher learning .
Secretary DeVos began an overhaul of the Title IX system in 2017 , and it is finally complete .
Under the Obama administration , the Title IX protections against gender discrimination , including sexual harassment , morphed into a system that operated kangaroo courts over any instance of “ unwelcome conduct @ @ @ @ @ @ @ removed due process rights to the accused and often left them unable to refute the charge .
Now , under reworked federal rules , alleged student perpetrators will have added protections , including the presumption that they are innocent throughout the disciplinary process and the right to be provided all evidence collected against them .
Those students can also cross-examine their accusers and vice versa during live hearings , although it must be done through a lawyer or representative .
Trending : Illinois Governor Puts SEVERE Restrictions On Churches Saying That They May @ @ @ @ @ @ @ More The changes , described in a more than 2,000-page document , go into effect on Aug. 14 .
They come after the Education Department “ heard from too many students whose careers were tarnished by administrators without any resemblance to due process , ” Kenneth Marcus , the agency ’ s assistant secretary of civil rights , told reporters .
“ This must stop.
” Source : NBC News The new rule narrows the definition of sexual harassment , brings back the presumption of innocence for the accused , gives them the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ challenge the evidence against them .
Basically , it restores due process rights to the accused , which is consistent with the standard used in our justice system .
Schools may now choose between two evidentiary standards–either by a preponderance of the evidence or by clear and convincing evidence , but it must be the same for both students and employees .
Under the Obama-era rule , schools were restricted to only use “ the preponderance of the evidence standard .
This was often described as “ 51 percent certainty ” that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ students have lost access to their education because their school inadequately responded when a student filed a complaint of sexual harassment or sexual assault , ” said DeVos in a statement .
“ This new regulation requires schools to act in meaningful ways to support survivors of sexual misconduct , without sacrificing important safeguards to ensure a fair and transparent process .
We can and must continue to fight sexual misconduct in our nation ’ s schools , and this rule makes certain that fight continues.
” Soon after the announcement was made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fail–issued a statement saying that Biden is committed to reverse the DeVos rule .
In a statement , Biden said the new rule was an effort by the Trump administration to “ shame and silence ” survivors of sexual assault .
“ It ’ s wrong , ” Biden said .
“ And , it will be put to a quick end in January 2021 , because as president , I ’ ll be right where I always have been throughout my career — on the side of survivors , who deserve to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken seriously and investigated , and their rights upheld.
” In light of the accusation made by Tara Reade , this is quite a statement by the Biden camp .
He ignored the accusation for as long as possible , aided by a biased media , and now feminists are coming to his defense–sorta .
Many , like noted feminist attorney Lisa Bloom , are saying that they still “ Believe All Women ” but are going to vote for Joe anyway because he ’ s the best shot at defeating Trump .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ see the mask ripped off and their partisanship exposed .
When Joe finally did address the accusation , he denied it , but it was an absolute train wreck .
Then Mr. “ Ignored The Accusation For As Long As Possible ” Biden said that the new rule would allow colleges to “ ignore ” sexual violence complaints .
This is apparently a Very Bad Thing that must not be done… unless you ’ re a Democrat running for President .
Biden said the DeVos rule “ gives colleges a green light to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would “ strip survivors of their rights.
” “ It lets colleges off the hook for protecting students , by permitting them to choose to investigate only more extreme acts of violence and harassment and requiring them to investigate in a way that dissuades survivors from coming forward , ” Biden said .
“ Survivors deserve to be treated with dignity and respect , and when they step forward they should be heard , not silenced .
Today , Betsy DeVos and Donald Trump published a rule that flies in the face of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be less safe for our nation ’ s young people , ” he added .
Under the Obama-era rules , with just the accusation made by Tara Reade , Biden would be considered guilty of sexual assault .
Period .
If the presumption of guilt , a complete lack of due process , and the accusation itself was enough evidence to destroy the future of college students and was used by sitting Senators now hoping to be Biden ’ s running mate against a Supreme Court nominee , why shouldn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same standard that he wants to be imposed on others ?
Simple–because conservatives truly believe that the accused also has rights .
It ’ s part of what makes America great .
Joe Biden clearly doesn ’ t seem to think so if he ’ s so committed to the “ fundamental transformation ” of the country .
He ’ s fine with one set of rules for him and one for the rest of us .
That is clearly not American .

Joe is doubling down on his support of the Obama-era rule that eliminated due process for the accused.
On Wednesday, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos announced new guidelines for handling complaints of sexual assault, harassment, and misconduct in K-12 schools and institutes of higher learning. Secretary DeVos began an overhaul of the Title IX system in 2017, and it is finally complete.
Under the Obama administration, the Title IX protections against gender discrimination, including sexual harassment, morphed into a system that operated kangaroo courts over any instance of “unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature.” It essentially removed due process rights to the accused and often left them unable to refute the charge.
Now, under reworked federal rules, alleged student perpetrators will have added protections, including the presumption that they are innocent throughout the disciplinary process and the right to be provided all evidence collected against them. Those students can also cross-examine their accusers and vice versa during live hearings, although it must be done through a lawyer or representative. The changes, described in a more than 2,000-page document, go into effect on Aug. 14. They come after the Education Department “heard from too many students whose careers were tarnished by administrators without any resemblance to due process,” Kenneth Marcus, the agency’s assistant secretary of civil rights, told reporters. “This must stop.”
Source: NBC News
The new rule narrows the definition of sexual harassment, brings back the presumption of innocence for the accused, gives them the ability to cross-examine their accuser, and challenge the evidence against them. Basically, it restores due process rights to the accused, which is consistent with the standard used in our justice system.
Schools may now choose between two evidentiary standards–either by a preponderance of the evidence or by clear and convincing evidence, but it must be the same for both students and employees.
Under the Obama-era rule, schools were restricted to only use “the preponderance of the evidence standard. This was often described as “51 percent certainty” that the facts are true.
“Too many students have lost access to their education because their school inadequately responded when a student filed a complaint of sexual harassment or sexual assault,” said DeVos in a statement. “This new regulation requires schools to act in meaningful ways to support survivors of sexual misconduct, without sacrificing important safeguards to ensure a fair and transparent process. We can and must continue to fight sexual misconduct in our nation’s schools, and this rule makes certain that fight continues.”
Soon after the announcement was made, the Biden campaign–in a stunning self-awareness fail–issued a statement saying that Biden is committed to reverse the DeVos rule.
In a statement, Biden said the new rule was an effort by the Trump administration to “shame and silence” survivors of sexual assault. “It’s wrong,” Biden said. “And, it will be put to a quick end in January 2021, because as president, I’ll be right where I always have been throughout my career — on the side of survivors, who deserve to have their voices heard, their claims taken seriously and investigated, and their rights upheld.”
In light of the accusation made by Tara Reade, this is quite a statement by the Biden camp.
He ignored the accusation for as long as possible, aided by a biased media, and now feminists are coming to his defense–sorta. Many, like noted feminist attorney Lisa Bloom, are saying that they still “Believe All Women” but are going to vote for Joe anyway because he’s the best shot at defeating Trump. It’s a shocking thing to see the mask ripped off and their partisanship exposed.
When Joe finally did address the accusation, he denied it, but it was an absolute train wreck.
Then Mr. “Ignored The Accusation For As Long As Possible” Biden said that the new rule would allow colleges to “ignore” sexual violence complaints. This is apparently a Very Bad Thing that must not be done… unless you’re a Democrat running for President.
Biden said the DeVos rule “gives colleges a green light to ignore sexual violence” on campuses and would “strip survivors of their rights.” “It lets colleges off the hook for protecting students, by permitting them to choose to investigate only more extreme acts of violence and harassment and requiring them to investigate in a way that dissuades survivors from coming forward,” Biden said. “Survivors deserve to be treated with dignity and respect, and when they step forward they should be heard, not silenced. Today, Betsy DeVos and Donald Trump published a rule that flies in the face of that belief and guarantees that college campuses will be less safe for our nation’s young people,” he added.
Under the Obama-era rules, with just the accusation made by Tara Reade, Biden would be considered guilty of sexual assault. Period.
The Trump campaign said that Biden is trying to hold students to a different standard than himself. Biden last week denied allegations of sexual assault made by Tara Reade, a former staffer in his Senate office in the early 1990s. “Biden should cut the malarkey and provide an honest answer to Americans – why shouldn’t he be held to the same standards he spent years imposing on everyone else?” said Trump campaign spokesman Andrew Clark. Source: The Hill
Now that’s a very good question.
If the presumption of guilt, a complete lack of due process, and the accusation itself was enough evidence to destroy the future of college students and was used by sitting Senators now hoping to be Biden’s running mate against a Supreme Court nominee, why shouldn’t we hold the presumptive Democratic nominee to the same standard that he wants to be imposed on others?
Simple–because conservatives truly believe that the accused also has rights. It’s part of what makes America great. Joe Biden clearly doesn’t seem to think so if he’s so committed to the “fundamental transformation” of the country. He’s fine with one set of rules for him and one for the rest of us. That is clearly not American.


clashdaily--2020-05-08--Spews Fake News: CNBC Echoes Actual Chinese Communist Propaganda

At what point can we finally admit that the First Amendment is being used for anything BUT the exercise of a free press — now they are repeating Xi ’ s talking points .
There is a ‘ study ’ released in China where the Citizens ‘ cheer ’ the Government for how amazing their response to the Coronavirus crisis was .
Here ’ s the ‘ news ’ as CNBC reported it : Citizens from just seven out of 23 countries rate their governments ’ coronavirus containment measures as broadly positive , based on the “ Global Crisis Perceptions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Blackbox Research and Toluna .
Trending : Illinois Governor Puts SEVERE Restrictions On Churches Saying That They May Not Open Up For A Year Or More The research , which surveyed approximately 12,500 people across 23 countries between April 3 and 19 , asked respondents to rate their nations across four key indicators : national political leadership , corporate leadership , community and media .
China , where the virus is thought to have originated , ranked highest in the citizens ’ survey , with a score of 85 out of 100 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ followed by Vietnam ( 77 ) , the United Arab Emirates ( 59 ) and India ( 59 ) , in a list which saw Asian countries take the top spots .
Oh , OK — this isn ’ t China ’ s equivalent to Chernobyl at all .
Oh , no .
This is the Chinese Communist Party ’ s shining moment in history , leading the rest of us into … whatever kind of utopia it is that corrupt , soulless tyrants offer to credulous fools .
China leads the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , do they ?
And would we call them an ‘ informed ’ public ?
What about if they are critical of their government in the world ’ s largest surveillance state ?

At what point can we finally admit that the First Amendment is being used for anything BUT the exercise of a free press — now they are repeating Xi’s talking points.
There is a ‘study’ released in China where the Citizens ‘cheer’ the Government for how amazing their response to the Coronavirus crisis was.
Here’s the ‘news’ as CNBC reported it:
Citizens from just seven out of 23 countries rate their governments’ coronavirus containment measures as broadly positive, based on the “Global Crisis Perceptions” index released Wednesday by insights agencies Blackbox Research and Toluna. The research, which surveyed approximately 12,500 people across 23 countries between April 3 and 19, asked respondents to rate their nations across four key indicators: national political leadership, corporate leadership, community and media. China, where the virus is thought to have originated, ranked highest in the citizens’ survey, with a score of 85 out of 100. The world’s second-largest economy was followed by Vietnam (77), the United Arab Emirates (59) and India (59), in a list which saw Asian countries take the top spots.
Oh, OK — this isn’t China’s equivalent to Chernobyl at all. Oh, no. This is the Chinese Communist Party’s shining moment in history, leading the rest of us into … whatever kind of utopia it is that corrupt, soulless tyrants offer to credulous fools.
China leads the world in their competent response to this disease, do they?
And would we call them an ‘informed’ public? What about if they are critical of their government in the world’s largest surveillance state?


clashdaily--2020-05-08--WATCH: Death Match Between Murder Hornet And  This New Contender

About a week ago , ‘ Murder Hornets ’ became the latest scare in the perpetual drip of media fear porn .
Somebody set up a death match between one of those giant wasps and another feisty insect .
In case you missed it , here ’ s the hype we were being given about these insects .
They are a potentially invasive species that has taken up residence in a couple of known locations on the Left Coast , in Washington State , and their Canadian counterparts .
The deadly meat-eating Asian giant hornet , which has been known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year in Japan , recently surfaced for the first time in the US in Washington state — and New York City beekeepers say there is no way it won ’ t make its way here , too .
Trending : Illinois Governor Puts SEVERE Restrictions On Churches Saying That They May Not Open Up For A Year Or More “ I told the NYPD back in 2012 … ‘ Your problem is not the bees .
This [ the murder hornet ] is your problem , ’ ” recalled retired Police Department beekeeper @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ I showed them a picture of it , and they go , ‘ What the hell is that ?
’ ” Planakis said .
“ I go , ‘ That is an Asian hornet .
My [ beekeeper ’ s ] suit is useless against that thing.
’ ” Asked if the monstrous insects are dangerous to humans , Planakis added , “ Absolutely .
Oh , my God.
” “ Have you seen the mandibles on these things ?
” The hornets , the world ’ s largest at more than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Washington in December , likely having made their way to the US aboard a ship from China , experts said .
—NYPost The colorful nickname ‘ Murder Hornet ’ lit up social media .
They can rip the heads off of , and devour , honeybees by the thousands .
Let ’ s see if they ’ re really as tough as they say .
How well does one handle itself in a prize fight ?
Introducing the praying mantis , which has been known to catch and eat hummingbirds .
How @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
How big a threat are they , really ?
“ This is 99 % media hype and frankly I ’ m getting tired of it , ” University of Delaware entomologist Doug Tallamy said , according to the Associated Press .
“ Murder hornet ?
Please.
” Washington Agriculture Department entomologist Chris Looney shared the same sentiment about the frightening nickname .
“ They are not ‘ murder hornets.
’ They are just hornets , ” Looney said .
“ The number of people who are stung and have to seek medical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s ridiculous to call them murder hornets .
It ’ s no more likely to sting and kill a human than a honey bee .
Actually it ’ s less likely , as honey bee venom packs quite a punch and it is exclusively designed to defend against vertebrates , ” wasp expert , researcher professor of entomology and , director of the Bohart Museum of Entomology , Lynn Kimsey , said in a blog from the University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources .
“ There is no evidence that there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Vancouver or anywhere else on the West Coast.
” — IBTimes

About a week ago, ‘Murder Hornets’ became the latest scare in the perpetual drip of media fear porn. Somebody set up a death match between one of those giant wasps and another feisty insect.
In case you missed it, here’s the hype we were being given about these insects.
They are a potentially invasive species that has taken up residence in a couple of known locations on the Left Coast, in Washington State, and their Canadian counterparts.
The deadly meat-eating Asian giant hornet, which has been known to kill up to 50 people a year in Japan, recently surfaced for the first time in the US in Washington state — and New York City beekeepers say there is no way it won’t make its way here, too. “I told the NYPD back in 2012 … ‘Your problem is not the bees. This [the murder hornet] is your problem,’” recalled retired Police Department beekeeper Anthony “Tony Bees” Planakis. “I showed them a picture of it, and they go, ‘What the hell is that?’ ” Planakis said. “I go, ‘That is an Asian hornet. My [beekeeper’s] suit is useless against that thing.’ ” Asked if the monstrous insects are dangerous to humans, Planakis added, “Absolutely. Oh, my God.” “Have you seen the mandibles on these things?” The hornets, the world’s largest at more than 2 inches long, were first spotted in Washington in December, likely having made their way to the US aboard a ship from China, experts said. —NYPost
The colorful nickname ‘Murder Hornet’ lit up social media. They can rip the heads off of, and devour, honeybees by the thousands.
Let’s see if they’re really as tough as they say. How well does one handle itself in a prize fight?
Introducing the praying mantis, which has been known to catch and eat hummingbirds. How would he fare against this fearsome threat?
Watch for yourself.
[Update: The video originally uploaded is no longer working. It has been replaced with this video featuring audio from an infamous sports moment. And to whoever paired that audio with this clip, we can only say: Wow. Well played.]
How big a threat are they, really?


clashdaily--2020-05-08--San Fran Is Delivering Alcohol, Tobacco, Weed, And Methodone To COVID-Positive Homeless Addicts Shel

San Fran Is Delivering Alcohol, Tobacco, Weed, And Methodone To COVID-Positive Homeless Addicts Sheltering In Hotels

With plans like this , is it any wonder Pelosi ’ s backyard is going to Hell ?
While ordinary citizens are being arrested and thrown in jail for LITERALLY doing their job , the homeless are getting to stay in hotels and get their favorite vices delivered by room service .
All in the name of COVID .
Will Californian Taxpayers be responsible for any damage these ‘ guests ’ incur on the hotels while they are in there ?
San Francisco is using private donations to deliver alcohol , tobacco and medical marijuana to homeless addicts staying in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trending : Illinois Governor Puts SEVERE Restrictions On Churches Saying That They May Not Open Up For A Year Or More As of Wednesday there are about 270 people , mostly homeless , staying in hotel rooms to recover from COVID-19 or to wait out possible exposure to the virus .
So far , 11 people have received alcohol , 27 have received tobacco and five have received medical marijuana , the San Francisco Chronicle reported .
City officials said that private donations pay for the items , and that helping manage nicotine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recovering people don ’ t go out and possibly infect others .
Dr Grant Colfax , San Francisco ’ s public health director , said the harm-reduction approach is widespread and based on decades of sound public health policy .
‘ Our focus needs to be on supporting them , ’ he said of the people who are isolating or under quarantine .
For people experiencing alcohol withdrawal , the Department of Public Health calculates the minimum amount needed and delivers them with meals .
— DailyMail We ’ ve got an unruly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and norms in the homeless community .
Throw in the wildcard of addiction , together with possible exposure to a communicable disease , and what are you supposed to do about that ?
Do you buy the ‘ public interest ’ argument for setting them up and placating them during their latency period ?
Or nah ?

With plans like this, is it any wonder Pelosi’s backyard is going to Hell?
While ordinary citizens are being arrested and thrown in jail for LITERALLY doing their job, the homeless are getting to stay in hotels and get their favorite vices delivered by room service. All in the name of COVID.
Will Californian Taxpayers be responsible for any damage these ‘guests’ incur on the hotels while they are in there?
San Francisco is using private donations to deliver alcohol, tobacco and medical marijuana to homeless addicts staying in city-leased hotels during the coronavirus pandemic. As of Wednesday there are about 270 people, mostly homeless, staying in hotel rooms to recover from COVID-19 or to wait out possible exposure to the virus. So far, 11 people have received alcohol, 27 have received tobacco and five have received medical marijuana, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. City officials said that private donations pay for the items, and that helping manage nicotine, opioid and alcohol cravings ensures that recovering people don’t go out and possibly infect others. Dr Grant Colfax, San Francisco’s public health director, said the harm-reduction approach is widespread and based on decades of sound public health policy. ‘Our focus needs to be on supporting them,’ he said of the people who are isolating or under quarantine. For people experiencing alcohol withdrawal, the Department of Public Health calculates the minimum amount needed and delivers them with meals. — DailyMail
We’ve got an unruly group already unused to following societal expectations and norms in the homeless community. Throw in the wildcard of addiction, together with possible exposure to a communicable disease, and what are you supposed to do about that?
Do you buy the ‘public interest’ argument for setting them up and placating them during their latency period? Or nah?


clashdaily--2020-05-08--FLYNN FREED: Police State Leftist Reactions Are Pure Trump Derangement Syndrome

Flynn was set up by his own government .
We have it in their own writing .
Today the DOJ dropped the case against him .
Naturally , that means the Left are losing their minds .
Yes , the DOJ has withdrawn its case against General Flynn .
He has been exonerated .
And unless the judge blocks the motion , he has his life back .
His reputation will take somewhat longer .
Especially when Leftists are working so hard to destroy him on a very personal level .
In a stunning and ‘ historic ’ turn of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was appointed by Department of Justice Attorney General William Barr , filed a motion to dismiss the case three years after charges were brought against former National Security Advisor Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn .
Flynn who had originally pleaded guilty under his previous defense counsel , had withdrawn his guilty plea earlier this year and charged the government prosecutors with strong-arming him and threatening his family , which led to his guilty plea .
.. “ This is a historic moment for the entire country and crucial to the restoration of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this reporter .
“ Millions and millions of Americans joined and supported our fight for the truth and this important step for the country to begin to believe that we can bring integrity back into our law enforcement institutions.
” Trending : Illinois Governor Puts SEVERE Restrictions On Churches Saying That They May Not Open Up For A Year Or More Jenson released a statement Thursday saying that “ through the course of my review of General Flynn ’ s case , I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a slew of documents the FBI and DOJ had kept from his defense throughout his trial said he “ briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings , advised him on these conclusions , and he agreed.
” —SaraACarter How have the left reacted to the news ?
In only the most reserved and rational way… by going nuclear .
Now , remember the pressure Flynn was under .
He had been harassed and pushed to insolvency having to sell his home to pay for legal costs in clearing his good name .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and grandkids into running the same ruinous gauntlet .
A long thread where Seth wants to see an innocent man burn… regardless of facts like entrapment , and all the other ‘ irregularities ’ that have shown up in the case against him .
Nadler wants an explanation — who has some crayons to put it in terms His Rotundness could understand ?
You think they ’ re all mad now ?
Just wait until we get a look at the big document dumps , and the Durham Investigation comes to a conclusion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need connecting .
For example… Ooooh , and wouldn ’ t THAT be a bad day for the Left ?
Finding out that their ‘ scandal-free ’ Lightbringer makes Richard Nixon look like a choirboy ?
That would be delicious .

Flynn was set up by his own government. We have it in their own writing. Today the DOJ dropped the case against him. Naturally, that means the Left are losing their minds.
Yes, the DOJ has withdrawn its case against General Flynn. He has been exonerated. And unless the judge blocks the motion, he has his life back. His reputation will take somewhat longer. Especially when Leftists are working so hard to destroy him on a very personal level.
In a stunning and ‘historic’ turn of events U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Jensen, who was appointed by Department of Justice Attorney General William Barr, filed a motion to dismiss the case three years after charges were brought against former National Security Advisor Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. Flynn who had originally pleaded guilty under his previous defense counsel, had withdrawn his guilty plea earlier this year and charged the government prosecutors with strong-arming him and threatening his family, which led to his guilty plea. ..“This is a historic moment for the entire country and crucial to the restoration of the rule of law,” Powell told this reporter. “Millions and millions of Americans joined and supported our fight for the truth and this important step for the country to begin to believe that we can bring integrity back into our law enforcement institutions.” Jenson released a statement Thursday saying that “through the course of my review of General Flynn’s case, I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case.” Jenson, who had discovered a slew of documents the FBI and DOJ had kept from his defense throughout his trial said he “briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings, advised him on these conclusions, and he agreed.” —SaraACarter
People having a really bad day:
-Adam Schiff
-Jerry Nadler
-Jim Comey
-Andy McCabe
-Rod Rosenstein
-Sally Yates
-Jim Clapper
-Barack Obama
-Joe Biden
People having a really good day:
-Americans who value justice — Dan Bongino (@dbongino) May 7, 2020
How have the left reacted to the news? In only the most reserved and rational way… by going nuclear. Now, remember the pressure Flynn was under. He had been harassed and pushed to insolvency having to sell his home to pay for legal costs in clearing his good name. And then they threaten to drag his kids and grandkids into running the same ruinous gauntlet.
Libs & media hacks don’t understand why Flynn would say he lied, when he didn’t, in order to keep his son from becoming the victim of another DOJ witch-hunt, because these cowards would send their kids to jail in a minute to get out of trouble. #FACT — Dan Bongino (@dbongino) May 8, 2020
A long thread where Seth wants to see an innocent man burn… regardless of facts like entrapment, and all the other ‘irregularities’ that have shown up in the case against him.
This ghoul works for Newsweak:
PS6/ When I refer to an "eleventh-hour miracle"—not that I expect one—it relates to the fact that Michael Flynn already pleaded guilty, which in theory gives the judge more authority (de jure and de facto) to block the DOJ action here. I don't know that that will happen, though. — Seth Abramson (@?) (@SethAbramson) May 7, 2020
Comey…
Sounds like something that someone who is very concerned about facing charges from DOJ would tweet. https://t.co/tuFLuzqHXU — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) May 7, 2020
DOJ lawyers of integrity will be tempted to resign over today’s motion to dismiss the Flynn case. My advice is to please stay. We need you instead of those who might replace you. — Barb McQuade (@BarbMcQuade) May 7, 2020
Nadler wants an explanation — who has some crayons to put it in terms His Rotundness could understand?
This is outrageous! Flynn PLEADED GUILTY to lying to investigators. The evidence against him is overwhelming. Now, a politicized DOJ is dropping the case. The decision to overrule the special counsel is without precedent and warrants an immediate explanation. 1/2 https://t.co/MxRyWkCMPw — (((Rep. Nadler))) (@RepJerryNadler) May 7, 2020
You think they’re all mad now? Just wait until we get a look at the big document dumps, and the Durham Investigation comes to a conclusion. There are still some dots that need connecting. For example…
It's also beginning to look like the corrupt scheme to entrap Flynn originated in the Oval Office in January 5, 2017. That's the meeting that Susan Rice chose to memorialize in a bizarre Inauguration Day memo claiming Obama told them to do everything "by the book." pic.twitter.com/ie64bwux7c — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) May 7, 2020
Ooooh, and wouldn’t THAT be a bad day for the Left?
Finding out that their ‘scandal-free’ Lightbringer makes Richard Nixon look like a choirboy?
That would be delicious.