clashdaily--2020-04-30--REPORT: 95% Of England’s Coronavirus Fatalities Had Underlying Conditions

There is one reason and one reason only that we are treating the CCP Coronavirus differently than , say , the common cold : the death toll .
That is the reason that every baby-step toward returning to normal life is met with a chorus of jeers and taunts about death and blood .
Somehow it ’ s perfectly safe for us to crowd in and buy groceries or tools at the hardware store , but it ’ s NOT safe to show up for a haircut or a Sunday Service .
The reason people are in panic mode is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In a world that literally idolizes comfort , health and eternal youth ( among a great many other things ) the thought of an invisible threat that doesn ’ t care if you ’ re one of the pretty people living behind the walls of a gated community , or in a Multi-Million dollar condo on 5th Avenue , one that has the medical experts scrambling to figure it out is terrifying .
Trending : De Blasio Tweet Singles Out Defiant Jews For Police Action — Ted Cruz Brings Him To TruthTown It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with mortality .
All the disruption we have seen since comes from that key fear : People May Die .
But we ’ ve learned quite a lot since then , haven ’ t we ?
Not only have we refined our treatments and looked up medical responses .
We ’ ve found that an awful lot of people actually get better .
And patterns are forming among those who DON ’ T get better .
Recent data from England ’ s National Health Services ( NHS ) reveals that 95 % of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had serious underlying health issues , findings that roughly align with the data out of New York City , the epicenter of the virus in the United States .
“ Ninety-five percent of people who have died with COVID-19 in hospitals in England had underlying health issues , ” Sky News reported Tuesday citing data obtained by the outlet .
“ The data provided by NHS England shows that , as of 5pm on 26 April , 18,749 people had died in hospital with the virus , ” Sky News reports .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it was not possible to confirm if a patient did or did not have an underlying health condition .
But for those where it was , 95 % were found to have serious pre-existing issues .
In patients over 80-years-old this figure was 96 % , 60-79-years-old 95 % , 40-59-years-old 88 % and 20-39-years-old 82 % .
” Sky News notes that breakdowns for victims under the age of 20 are not possible because it “ can not be disclosed as the sample is so small it would breach patient confidentiality rules @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pre-existing conditions.
” The data also excludes “ hospital deaths in Wales , Scotland and Northern Ireland , in the community or in care homes.
” —DailyWire This is to say that not only is the actual percentage chance of lethality dropping like a stone from the terrifying numbers bounced around in the early days to a still-ugly-but-far-more-manageable number we ’ re seeing today , but even the characteristics of those who ARE dying fall within a very narrow and predictable profile .
What does this tell us ?
It tells us that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ keeping young and healthy peeps from living their lives in the real world was a misallocation of our energy and resources .
That way of thinking literally cost countless lives when officials in New York made the reckless decision ( with Cuomo ’ s signature ) to send infected patients into retirement homes .
It rampaged through those places like wildfire , leaving mourning families in its wake .
Meanwhile , the Chris Cuomos and Tom Hankses of the world get sick , get better , and go on with their lives , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any more conventional illness .
We can ’ t roll back time , but about we use what we NOW know to flip the script ?
Instead of tilting at windmills trying to prevent everyone from getting exposed to this virus , how about we focus our defenses on those who are truly the most vulnerable ?
Have the highest possible infection protocols on those caring for the aged and otherwise vulnerable , for example ?

There is one reason and one reason only that we are treating the CCP Coronavirus differently than, say, the common cold: the death toll.
That is the reason that every baby-step toward returning to normal life is met with a chorus of jeers and taunts about death and blood.
Somehow it’s perfectly safe for us to crowd in and buy groceries or tools at the hardware store, but it’s NOT safe to show up for a haircut or a Sunday Service.
The reason people are in panic mode is simple: people really are dying. In a world that literally idolizes comfort, health and eternal youth (among a great many other things) the thought of an invisible threat that doesn’t care if you’re one of the pretty people living behind the walls of a gated community, or in a Multi-Million dollar condo on 5th Avenue, one that has the medical experts scrambling to figure it out is terrifying.
It’s an uncomfortable and humbling brush with mortality.
All the disruption we have seen since comes from that key fear: People May Die.
But we’ve learned quite a lot since then, haven’t we? Not only have we refined our treatments and looked up medical responses. We’ve found that an awful lot of people actually get better.
And patterns are forming among those who DON’T get better.
Recent data from England’s National Health Services (NHS) reveals that 95% of the people diagnosed with COVID-19 who died had serious underlying health issues, findings that roughly align with the data out of New York City, the epicenter of the virus in the United States. “Ninety-five percent of people who have died with COVID-19 in hospitals in England had underlying health issues,” Sky News reported Tuesday citing data obtained by the outlet. “The data provided by NHS England shows that, as of 5pm on 26 April, 18,749 people had died in hospital with the virus,” Sky News reports. “In a small number of cases, it was not possible to confirm if a patient did or did not have an underlying health condition. But for those where it was, 95% were found to have serious pre-existing issues. In patients over 80-years-old this figure was 96%, 60-79-years-old 95%, 40-59-years-old 88% and 20-39-years-old 82%.” Sky News notes that breakdowns for victims under the age of 20 are not possible because it “cannot be disclosed as the sample is so small it would breach patient confidentiality rules to distinguish between those with or without pre-existing conditions.” The data also excludes “hospital deaths in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, in the community or in care homes.” —DailyWire
This is to say that not only is the actual percentage chance of lethality dropping like a stone from the terrifying numbers bounced around in the early days to a still-ugly-but-far-more-manageable number we’re seeing today, but even the characteristics of those who ARE dying fall within a very narrow and predictable profile.
What does this tell us?
It tells us that maybe focussing all of our energy on keeping young and healthy peeps from living their lives in the real world was a misallocation of our energy and resources.
That way of thinking literally cost countless lives when officials in New York made the reckless decision (with Cuomo’s signature) to send infected patients into retirement homes. It rampaged through those places like wildfire, leaving mourning families in its wake.
Meanwhile, the Chris Cuomos and Tom Hankses of the world get sick, get better, and go on with their lives, just the same as we would with any more conventional illness.
We can’t roll back time, but about we use what we NOW know to flip the script?
Instead of tilting at windmills trying to prevent everyone from getting exposed to this virus, how about we focus our defenses on those who are truly the most vulnerable? Have the highest possible infection protocols on those caring for the aged and otherwise vulnerable, for example?


clashdaily--2020-04-30--SMOKING GUN: New FBI Docs PROVE Flynn Case Was A Shakedown From Day One

They admitted as much , literally ‘ in their own words ’ and it ’ s in their own handwriting .
More than 3 years later , those of us who called this whole investigation a political hit job are fully vindicated .
More importantly , so is General Flynn .
There are ‘ explosive stories ’ and then there is catching the bastards red-handed .
This is the latter .
It took 3 years for this to finally come to light , yet people still actually wonder why we rail against a ‘ deep state ’ ?
Remember when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as to whether the investigations into Trump ’ s team were ‘ politically motivated ’ ?
What could possibly be more ‘ politically motivated ’ than an explicit objective to catch someone in a lie to get someone prosecuted or fired ?
Trending : De Blasio Tweet Singles Out Defiant Jews For Police Action — Ted Cruz Brings Him To TruthTown We have laws prohibiting legal entrapment for a reason .
This case is a primer for exactly what such laws need to exist .
New documents filed under seal last week by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ evidence yet that the investigation and subsequent prosecution of former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was a set-up from the beginning .
Handwritten notes from the Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ) that had been inappropriately withheld from Flynn ’ s defense team for years show that a key goal of the agents investigating Flynn was “ to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired.
” In early 2017 , FBI agents planned to question Flynn under false pretenses and without his attorneys present @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kislyak .
At the time of those conversations , Flynn was the top foreign policy adviser of the president-elect of the United States .
By the time of the ambush FBI interview , Flynn had already been appointed as the White House national security adviser .
…The explosive new documents support Flynn ’ s latest claims that Obama-era Department of Justice ( DOJ ) and FBI officials had conspired to set him up from the beginning and that they never had any legitimate basis for investigating him .
The author of the handwritten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrote , “ We have a case on Flynn and Russians , ” and “ our goal is to resolve case.
” Despite those claims of treasonous Russian collusion , Mueller found , after a sprawling , multi-year , multimillion-dollar investigation , that there was zero evidence of illegal collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government to steal the 2016 election from Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton .
— Federalist From day one , Trump-haters on the left and the right lapped up this story and used Flynn as a cudgel against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It was also the pretext and springboard for what later became the Mueller investigation .
But don ’ t take our word for it… Now that the smoke has cleared , we see just how wrong some of the finger pointers were .
Here ’ s Jeff Flake : This is the guy who deep-sixed Republican judicial appointments in an effort to unconstitutionally limit Trump ’ s Article II powers concerning Mueller because he was *convinced* a ‘ guilty ’ Trump would fire Mueller to hide alleged dark dealings with Russia .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ELSE a ‘ conspiracy theorist ’ ?
And what about THIS guy ?
And this is the ‘ mainstream ’ media today… Are your liberal buddies claiming it wasn ’ t a set-up ?
Have them explain this : Were they looking for the truth — ‘ wherever it may lead them ’ — or a pre-determined result ?
Here ’ s a clue .
They were working all the angles… Does this sound like the communication of someone acting with a clear conscience ?
There is a lot more where that came @ @ @ @ @ @ @ account if you care to dig deeper .
For all of this , what did General Flynn — who has had his name dragged through the mud , and has been brought to financial ruin in defending his good name have to say ?
It was the simplest of all messages , one that will endear him to his supporters all the more .
We ’ ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with a less than stellar past , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

They admitted as much, literally ‘in their own words’ and it’s in their own handwriting.
More than 3 years later, those of us who called this whole investigation a political hit job are fully vindicated. More importantly, so is General Flynn.
There are ‘explosive stories’ and then there is catching the bastards red-handed. This is the latter. It took 3 years for this to finally come to light, yet people still actually wonder why we rail against a ‘deep state’?
Remember when that IG report was ‘inconclusive’ as to whether the investigations into Trump’s team were ‘politically motivated’? What could possibly be more ‘politically motivated’ than an explicit objective to catch someone in a lie to get someone prosecuted or fired?
We have laws prohibiting legal entrapment for a reason. This case is a primer for exactly what such laws need to exist.
New documents filed under seal last week by the Department of Justice provide the clearest evidence yet that the investigation and subsequent prosecution of former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was a set-up from the beginning. Handwritten notes from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that had been inappropriately withheld from Flynn’s defense team for years show that a key goal of the agents investigating Flynn was “to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired.” In early 2017, FBI agents planned to question Flynn under false pretenses and without his attorneys present regarding his conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. At the time of those conversations, Flynn was the top foreign policy adviser of the president-elect of the United States. By the time of the ambush FBI interview, Flynn had already been appointed as the White House national security adviser. …The explosive new documents support Flynn’s latest claims that Obama-era Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI officials had conspired to set him up from the beginning and that they never had any legitimate basis for investigating him. The author of the handwritten notes filed under seal last week also wrote, “We have a case on Flynn and Russians,” and “our goal is to resolve case.” Despite those claims of treasonous Russian collusion, Mueller found, after a sprawling, multi-year, multimillion-dollar investigation, that there was zero evidence of illegal collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government to steal the 2016 election from Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. — Federalist
From day one, Trump-haters on the left and the right lapped up this story and used Flynn as a cudgel against Trump in their favorite guilt-by-association smears. It was also the pretext and springboard for what later became the Mueller investigation. But don’t take our word for it…
#FLYNN docs just unsealed, including handwritten notes 1/24/2017 day of Flynn FBI interview. Transcript: “What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” Read transcript notes, copy original just filed. @CBSNews pic.twitter.com/8oqUok8i7m — Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) April 29, 2020
Now that the smoke has cleared, we see just how wrong some of the finger pointers were. Here’s Jeff Flake:
“Michael Flynn didn’t come up for a Senate vote,” Flake told Bharara, who was fired from his U.S. attorney position by Trump earlier this year. “I said from the beginning, if that were, I wouldn’t have voted for it, that I thought a conspiracy theorist like that doesn’t belong as head of national security.” — The Hill
This is the guy who deep-sixed Republican judicial appointments in an effort to unconstitutionally limit Trump’s Article II powers concerning Mueller because he was *convinced* a ‘guilty’ Trump would fire Mueller to hide alleged dark dealings with Russia. And Flake has the gall to call someone ELSE a ‘conspiracy theorist’?
And what about THIS guy?
When smug superiority goes very, very wrong… https://t.co/57gC2oFWMw — Wes Walker (@Republicanuck) April 30, 2020
The ‘mainstream’ media was complicit then…
Now that the FBI’s notes have been revealed, and we’ve seen with our own eyes their corrupt efforts to destroy and set-up General Flynn, does this leak to the Wash Post make more sense? They wanted him at ease for their interview THE NEXT DAY.
#279 ??????https://t.co/VQQPL4vMYw — Dan Bongino (@dbongino) April 29, 2020
And this is the ‘mainstream’ media today…
Are your liberal buddies claiming it wasn’t a set-up? Have them explain this:
Basically here’s @Comey bragging about what we now know was the #Flynn setup. Watch?? pic.twitter.com/u2WnwMtRVO — Bradley Marcus (@MarcusP62428099) April 30, 2020
Were they looking for the truth — ‘wherever it may lead them’ — or a pre-determined result? Here’s a clue.
How they planned to get Flynn removed: 1) Get Flynn “to admit to breaking the Logan Act”; or 2) Catch Flynn in a lie. Their end goal was a referral to the DOJ – not to investigate Flynn's contacts with the Russians. pic.twitter.com/Vty3FYaSt9 — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) April 29, 2020
They were working all the angles…
Credit to these fine folks for their hard work:@SidneyPowell1 @molmccann @jbinnall Read the full it all here:https://t.co/xLGgNjHPoL — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) April 29, 2020
Does this sound like the communication of someone acting with a clear conscience?
♦Strzok replies: “I know. I just talked with John, we’re getting together as soon as I get in to finish that write up for Andy (MCCABE) this morning.” Strzok agrees with Page about being stressed that “THIS” could go off the rails… (Strzok’s meeting w Flynn the next day) pic.twitter.com/8xwcz5Kuvc — TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) April 30, 2020
There is a lot more where that came from in the ‘Last Refuge’ account if you care to dig deeper.
For all of this, what did General Flynn — who has had his name dragged through the mud, and has been brought to financial ruin in defending his good name have to say?
It was the simplest of all messages, one that will endear him to his supporters all the more.
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-04-30--De Blasio Tweet Singles Out Defiant Jews For Police Action — Ted Cruz Brings Him To TruthTown

Where are all those timid souls who claimed to be so worried about ‘ Autocratic ’ Trump now that De Blasio is pulling this crap ?
For all the ‘ literally Hitler ’ references we ’ ve heard for the last three years , Trump is not the one threatening to round up Jews for defying government edicts that run clash in obvious ways with explicit Constitutional Rights .
The political Left has the market mostly cornered on that front .
This is but the latest example of it .
In New York , at least TWO Democrat darlings , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the dreaded virus .
That by itself is no big deal .
What IS a big deal is that they were both caught wandering the city while infectious .
The Governor ’ s own brother , Fredo from CNN was one .
And ABC anchor George Snuffleupagus is the other .
Latest : HEY LEFTISTS : Here 's What You DO N'T Know About That 'Butter Maiden ' You Canceled Sorry .
That ’ s the Sesame Street muppet .
We , of course , meant the Democrat muppet and former Clinton-Comms-Director-turned-Senior-Advisor George @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to pay any price for taking reckless action that literally endangered the lives of strangers .
They did as they pleased with no consequence , even though ( being infectious ) they were the functional equivalent of a live grenade lobbed into the public .
Democrat darlings can walk around freely , and Rikers can offload the expense of housing convicted felons into the general population ( with a predictable rise in crime ) , while uninfected people are made to stay home… ‘ or else ’ .
His ‘ Snitch Line ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Blasio in a public appearance , surrounded by people , while NOT wearing a mask .
And he has the audacity to single out one group in particular .
Does he even KNOW what week it is on the Jewish Calendar ?
For context , a little more than 24 hours before De Blasio ’ s tweet , this was posted : Ted Cruz took him to the woodshed over it .
We might point out that De Blasio singled out one particular religious group for his threats , and not for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were threatened with the ‘ permanent closure ’ of religious meeting houses if they defied order not to worship corporately .
We can ’ t help but notice that he had the cojones to threaten Jews and Christians in Secular New York during Easter .
But we are now in Ramadan .
As Trump once mused , will there be uniformity in this harassment ?
Or not ?
Maybe instead of trying to micromanage people who are well — at the risk of trampling Constitutional rights — he should turn his attention to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for instance , seems to be a higher priority .
Can you even IMAGINE the airplay this would get if De Blasio had an ( R ) after his name ?
AG Barr Assures Faith Leaders That The Trump Admin Has Got Their Back If ‘ Singled Out ’ By State , Local Lockdowns Trump Went There !
Will COVID Restrictions Impact All Religions Equally… Or Nah ?

Where are all those timid souls who claimed to be so worried about ‘Autocratic’ Trump now that De Blasio is pulling this crap?
For all the ‘literally Hitler’ references we’ve heard for the last three years, Trump is not the one threatening to round up Jews for defying government edicts that run clash in obvious ways with explicit Constitutional Rights.
The political Left has the market mostly cornered on that front. This is but the latest example of it.
In New York, at least TWO Democrat darlings, and well-connected TV talking heads, contracted the dreaded virus. That by itself is no big deal. What IS a big deal is that they were both caught wandering the city while infectious. The Governor’s own brother, Fredo from CNN was one. And ABC anchor George Snuffleupagus is the other.
Sorry. That’s the Sesame Street muppet. We, of course, meant the Democrat muppet and former Clinton-Comms-Director-turned-Senior-Advisor George Stephanopoulos.
Neither of them were made to pay any price for taking reckless action that literally endangered the lives of strangers. They did as they pleased with no consequence, even though (being infectious) they were the functional equivalent of a live grenade lobbed into the public.
Democrat darlings can walk around freely, and Rikers can offload the expense of housing convicted felons into the general population (with a predictable rise in crime), while uninfected people are made to stay home… ‘or else’.
His ‘Snitch Line‘ even featured an embarrassing photo of De Blasio in a public appearance, surrounded by people, while NOT wearing a mask.
And he has the audacity to single out one group in particular.
My message to the Jewish community, and all communities, is this simple: the time for warnings has passed. I have instructed the NYPD to proceed immediately to summons or even arrest those who gather in large groups. This is about stopping this disease and saving lives. Period. — Mayor Bill de Blasio (@NYCMayor) April 29, 2020
(Here’s a screen-grab in case he deletes it.)
Does he even KNOW what week it is on the Jewish Calendar? For context, a little more than 24 hours before De Blasio’s tweet, this was posted:
In Israel, #YomHaZikaron – Memorial Day, has begun. On this day we remember the country’s fallen soldiers and victims of terror. We join with Israel and remember the thousands who have died defending the Jewish state and in acts of terror. pic.twitter.com/b6qH9quNM9 — ADL (@ADL) April 27, 2020
Talk about tone-deaf.
Ted Cruz took him to the woodshed over it.
Would DeBlasio have sent this identical tweet with the word “Jewish” replaced by any other religious minority? If not, why not? Laws should be enforced neutrally w/o targeting religious faith. #ProtectFreeExercise https://t.co/dMVcX0bin4 — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) April 29, 2020
We might point out that De Blasio singled out one particular religious group for his threats, and not for the first time. (Jews and Christians were threatened with the ‘permanent closure’ of religious meeting houses if they defied order not to worship corporately.
We can’t help but notice that he had the cojones to threaten Jews and Christians in Secular New York during Easter. But we are now in Ramadan.
As Trump once mused, will there be uniformity in this harassment? Or not?
Maybe instead of trying to micromanage people who are well — at the risk of trampling Constitutional rights — he should turn his attention to doing his job?
This issue, for instance, seems to be a higher priority.
A HEARTBREAKING moment of a woman who lost a family member. Although we pray for her, MAYOR DEBLASIO SHOULD BURN IN HELL for what he’s done to NYC. This poor lady says it all. God bless her. pic.twitter.com/pmL6XZ8HNq — SBA (@SBANYPD) April 28, 2020
Can you even IMAGINE the airplay this would get if De Blasio had an (R) after his name?
Related…
AG Barr Assures Faith Leaders That The Trump Admin Has Got Their Back If ‘Singled Out’ By State, Local Lockdowns
Trump Went There! Will COVID Restrictions Impact All Religions Equally… Or Nah?


clashdaily--2020-04-30--Remember The Woman Who Gave Her Husband Fish Tank Cleaner To Prevent COVID And He Died? Police Are N

Remember The Woman Who Gave Her Husband Fish Tank Cleaner To Prevent COVID And He Died? Police Are Now Investigating

The Media ( D ) and the woman quickly blamed Trump for the man ’ s death .
But new information is raising questions about what exactly happened .
Back in mid-March , President Trump was touting the coronavirus treatment that was being tried with some success in France–the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine , inexpensive medications that are used for malaria , lupus , and rheumatoid arthritis .
The President indicated that he was hopeful that a viable treatment for coronavirus was much closer than the 18-months or so to develop a new drug .
Wanda Lenius , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that she saw the President ’ s presser and when she saw some fish tank cleaner–chloroquine phosphate–in her cupboard she thought , “ hey , isn ’ t that the stuff they ’ re talking about on tv ?
” She then mixed a teaspoon into her husband ’ s soda and some into her own .
Sady , her husband Gary , 68 , died from consuming the poisonous substance .
Wanda was hospitalized but did manage to tell several news outlets what had happened and followed up with “ Oh my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Don ’ t believe anything that the president says and his people … call your doctor.
” Recently , some new information makes Wanda Lenius ’ s story about consuming fish tank cleaner as “ basically a cure ” for coronavirus into question .
Gary Lenius was a mechanical engineer who his friends say wouldn ’ t have just consumed a lethal amount of fish tank cleaner because of something that someone said on tv .
You ’ d think that an educated guy like Gary would be skeptical of self-medicating with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if consumed by humans as it says on the label .
Besides , chloroquine phosphate isn ’ t medical-grade chloroquine used for the prescription anti-malarial drugs .
In addition , people close to Gary say that Lenius ’ s marriage was a troubled one .
Early in their marriage , Wanda was been charged with domestic assault but was found not guilty because Gary refused to cooperate in the case .
Friends describe Gary as level-headed and devoted to Wanda , but Wanda had a temper and was berating Gary and frequently humiliating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ marriage as one-sided .
It was also revealed that Wanda was a registered Democrat whose most recent contribution was to a “ pro-science ” super PAC .
In short , Wanda Lenius didn ’ t seem to be the kind of person who would blindly follow what she perceived as advice from President Trump .
A friend of Gary ’ s said that Wanda routinely prepared Gary a “ vitamin cocktail.
” Wanda said that they decided to take the fish tank cleaner because Gary been planning on scheduling an appointment with a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but they were concerned that they might contract COVID at the clinic and they were in the high-risk category .
Wanda says that the only thing that her husband asked about the chloroquine phosphate was to ask “ is it still good ?
” Mesa police seem to find Wanda Lenius ’ s story somewhat…fishy and homicide detectives are investigating it .
What happens if turns out that this woman really did intentionally kill her husband and try to pin the blame on something that Trump had said during a coronavirus briefing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absolute tragedy , but the Media ( D ) that were spreading this story to “ own ” the President and lecture them on his language would be caught yet again not examining a story thoroughly enough because it fit their narrative .
Whatever the outcome , a man has needlessly died and that is an absolute tragedy .
• Anti-Trump News Orgs Report That A Man Died ‘ Self-Medicating ’ On Chloroquine — Here ’ s What They ’ re NOT Telling You… • WATCH : Actor Daniel Dae Kim Says Hydroxychloroquine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Finally Admits Trump Was RIGHT About Coronavirus Treatment–Here ’ s Where Media ( D ) Got It WRONG

The Media(D) and the woman quickly blamed Trump for the man’s death. But new information is raising questions about what exactly happened.
Back in mid-March, President Trump was touting the coronavirus treatment that was being tried with some success in France–the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, inexpensive medications that are used for malaria, lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis. The President indicated that he was hopeful that a viable treatment for coronavirus was much closer than the 18-months or so to develop a new drug.
Wanda Lenius, a 61-year old woman from Arizona, claimed that she saw the President’s presser and when she saw some fish tank cleaner–chloroquine phosphate–in her cupboard she thought, “hey, isn’t that the stuff they’re talking about on tv?” She then mixed a teaspoon into her husband’s soda and some into her own. Sady, her husband Gary, 68, died from consuming the poisonous substance. Wanda was hospitalized but did manage to tell several news outlets what had happened and followed up with “Oh my God, don’t take anything. Don’t believe anything that the president says and his people … call your doctor.”
Recently, some new information makes Wanda Lenius’s story about consuming fish tank cleaner as “basically a cure” for coronavirus into question. Gary Lenius was a mechanical engineer who his friends say wouldn’t have just consumed a lethal amount of fish tank cleaner (enough to figure out how to euthanize a fish pet) because of something that someone said on tv.
“What bothers me about this is that Gary was a very intelligent man, a retired [mechanical] engineer who designed systems for John Deere in Waterloo, Iowa, and I really can’t see the scenario where Gary would say, ‘Yes, please, I would love to drink some of that Koi fish tank cleaner,'” one of his close friends told the Free Beacon. “It just doesn’t make any sense.”
You’d think that an educated guy like Gary would be skeptical of self-medicating with something that said that it was lethal if consumed by humans as it says on the label. Besides, chloroquine phosphate isn’t medical-grade chloroquine used for the prescription anti-malarial drugs.
In addition, people close to Gary say that Lenius’s marriage was a troubled one. Early in their marriage, Wanda was been charged with domestic assault but was found not guilty because Gary refused to cooperate in the case. Friends describe Gary as level-headed and devoted to Wanda, but Wanda had a temper and was berating Gary and frequently humiliating him in public. They described the marriage as one-sided.
It was also revealed that Wanda was a registered Democrat whose most recent contribution was to a “pro-science” super PAC.
In short, Wanda Lenius didn’t seem to be the kind of person who would blindly follow what she perceived as advice from President Trump.
Detective Teresa Van Galder, the homicide detective handling the case for the Mesa City Police Department, confirmed that the investigation is ongoing but declined to provide additional details. “As this is an active investigation, I cannot go into any details at this time regarding the case,” Van Galder said. The Free Beacon provided a recording of its interview last month with Wanda Lenius.
A friend of Gary’s said that Wanda routinely prepared Gary a “vitamin cocktail.”
Asked if she and Gary Lenius had a conversation about taking the chloroquine at that time, she told the Free Beacon: “No. I mean, it was really kind of a spur of the moment thing,” adding that the couple ingested “one teaspoon and some soda” each, at least four times the lethal limit. Source: Washington Free Beacon
Wanda said that they decided to take the fish tank cleaner because Gary been planning on scheduling an appointment with a doctor to have a leg injury examined, but they were concerned that they might contract COVID at the clinic and they were in the high-risk category. Wanda says that the only thing that her husband asked about the chloroquine phosphate was to ask “is it still good?”
Mesa police seem to find Wanda Lenius’s story somewhat…fishy and homicide detectives are investigating it.
What happens if turns out that this woman really did intentionally kill her husband and try to pin the blame on something that Trump had said during a coronavirus briefing? Not only would it be an absolute tragedy, but the Media(D) that were spreading this story to “own” the President and lecture them on his language would be caught yet again not examining a story thoroughly enough because it fit their narrative.
Whatever the outcome, a man has needlessly died and that is an absolute tragedy.
Related:


clashdaily--2020-04-30--Elon Musk Wants An End To The ‘De Facto House Arrest’–Pushes For Re-Opening The Country

The self-described “ half-Democrat , half-Republican ” is tired of the lockdowns and wants them to end .
In a series of tweets early Wednesday morning , Tesla CEO , Elon Musk , urged states across the country to reopen and end the lockdowns .
He tweeted , “ FREE AMERICA NOW ” and “ Give people their freedom back.
” Tesla CEO Elon Musk is urging states across the country to put an end to lockdowns aimed at preventing the spread of COVID-19… …As the global COVID-19 outbreak began to take hold in the United States last month , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ requiring people to avoid unnecessary travel and large gatherings in an effort to mitigate the spread of the disease .
Many states also ordered nonessential businesses to close up shop for a time as part of the directives .
Many of those orders are set to expire at the start of May as President Trump and other leaders look to boost the economy after several weeks of mass closures in much of the nation .
Musk also tweeted out support for Governor Abbot ’ s move to begin re-opening businesses in Texas .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that opening up should include care and appropriate protection , but that governments shouldn ’ t “ put everyone under de facto house arrest.
” We need to start opening up the country again , but we need to do it in a smart way .
Americans have learned a lot throughout this pandemic , and I think that we can trust most Americans to behave in a way that protects vulnerable people while living their lives .
There will also be a lot of people that are going to be cautious about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they did pre-COVID .
Most people will take precautions .
We need our leaders to not behave like they ’ re our parents .
Look at the beaches in Florida–despite everyone warning against the reopening , it seems that people are social distancing and obeying the rules .
The same thing can apply on a larger scale .
We just need our leaders to trust us to be responsible .

The self-described “half-Democrat, half-Republican” is tired of the lockdowns and wants them to end.
In a series of tweets early Wednesday morning, Tesla CEO, Elon Musk, urged states across the country to reopen and end the lockdowns. He tweeted, “FREE AMERICA NOW” and “Give people their freedom back.”
FREE AMERICA NOW — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 29, 2020
Give people their freedom back! https://t.co/iG8OYGaVZ0 — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 29, 2020
Tesla CEO Elon Musk is urging states across the country to put an end to lockdowns aimed at preventing the spread of COVID-19… …As the global COVID-19 outbreak began to take hold in the United States last month, a number of governors issued stay-at-home orders requiring people to avoid unnecessary travel and large gatherings in an effort to mitigate the spread of the disease. Many states also ordered nonessential businesses to close up shop for a time as part of the directives. Many of those orders are set to expire at the start of May as President Trump and other leaders look to boost the economy after several weeks of mass closures in much of the nation. Source: The Hill
Musk also tweeted out support for Governor Abbot’s move to begin re-opening businesses in Texas.
In a follow-up tweet, Musk said that opening up should include care and appropriate protection, but that governments shouldn’t “put everyone under de facto house arrest.”
Yes, reopen with care & appropriate protection, but don’t put everyone under de facto house arrest — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 29, 2020
Elon Musk is right.
We need to start opening up the country again, but we need to do it in a smart way.
Americans have learned a lot throughout this pandemic, and I think that we can trust most Americans to behave in a way that protects vulnerable people while living their lives. There will also be a lot of people that are going to be cautious about resuming life in the same way that they did pre-COVID. Most people will take precautions.
We need our leaders to not behave like they’re our parents.
Look at the beaches in Florida–despite everyone warning against the reopening, it seems that people are social distancing and obeying the rules. The same thing can apply on a larger scale. We just need our leaders to trust us to be responsible.


clashdaily--2020-04-30--Forbes Science Tweet Proves COVID Is Making The TDS-Suffering Media Even More Stupid

There is no escaping the “ dunk on Trump ” partisan press–even when it comes to science articles .
Forbes Science tweeted a link to an article addressing whether or not lava could kill the coronavirus .
Trending : De Blasio Tweet Singles Out Defiant Jews For Police Action — Ted Cruz Brings Him To TruthTown Just in case they realize how incredibly stupid this tweet is , here ’ s a screenshot for posterity .
Apparently , the article was written because someone actually posed the question .
And they actually decided to address it .
Robin Andrews , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ email question and used the opportunity to ( of course ! )
dunk on Trump supporters .
I was recently emailed a question that really is a sign of the times : namely , can lava kill the coronavirus ?
I don ’ t suspect that anyone , including the sender of said email , was planning to sterilise their house with lava .
But I wouldn ’ t put it past the people who , erroneously lured by the president ’ s breathtakingly idiotic idea of consuming virus-annihilating bleach and disinfectant , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stronger in order to send SARS-Cov-2 packing .
Lava is fortunately quite difficult to get your hands on , and personal supplies of the stuff are few and far between .
Saying that , the simple answer is yes : lava would obliterate the coronavirus .
But a more interesting response here involves a little detour into the history of heat-loving microbes .
Oh , look at that–Andrews includes in his article that Trump-supporting rubes are consuming bleach and disinfectants because the President made an off-hand comment about that the Media ( D @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say that people should “ inject bleach ” or “ inhale Lysol ” ?
That was all the media ’ s interpretation of his words .
But that ’ s what the partisan press is doing these days–create a straw man argument , imagine someone who believes it , attack them as stupid , then behave as though that ’ s accurate reporting .
It ’ s the “ Fine People Hoax ” meets David Brooks ’ “ Flyover Man.
” We saw how this played out last time when the Media ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an Arizona couple that consumed fish tank cleaner allegedly because the President had touted the use of hydroxychloroquine as a possible treatment for COVID-19 and it resulted in the man ’ s death .
It turns out that there is something more to the story as the death is now being investigated by Mesa , AZ homicide detectives .
Did the Media ( D ) ever come clean on that one ?
Nope .
Just like everything else that puts them in a bad light , they ’ ve memory-holed it .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presumptions that the political reporters use–Trump supporters are by definition stupid .
Andrews ’ article continues to contain some actual science and discusses how microbes can survive in inhospitable environments .
In many respects , it was a reasonable article , but he just had to smash in the anti-Trump stuff to make sure that everyone knows that he is so much more intelligent than President Trump and his supporters .
He even concluded his article with another snide shot at those who might consider using some molten rock as a “ disinfectant.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ limit for life .
Viruses , which aren ’ t technically lifeforms , can ’ t hack it either .
So yes , lava would kill the new coronavirus .
But for the love of all that is rational , please don ’ t try to kill SARS-CoV-2 with lava if you just happen to own any molten rock : the virus may perish , but your house , belongings or oesophagus wouldn ’ t survive the ordeal either .
The question that should be posed to Andrews is who is the real @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump supporter whose ideas and stupidity Andrews pulled out of his own ass before ‘ disproving ’ him , or Andrews himself for thinking he ’ s a hero for destroying this made-up guy ?
Because obviously , not a single Trump supporter has any idea about the basics of medical science .
Not even , say , Dr. Carson , who famously performed that separation of conjoined twins .

There is no escaping the “dunk on Trump” partisan press–even when it comes to science articles.
Forbes Science tweeted a link to an article addressing whether or not lava could kill the coronavirus.
Yes, really.
Technically lava can kill coronavirus, but there's a good reason why no-one is using it in the fight against the ongoing pandemic: nothing else would survive the encounter with molten rock either.https://t.co/IOWeDY9zzt pic.twitter.com/xZ5o7h3F4f — Forbes Science (@ForbesScience) April 29, 2020
Just in case they realize how incredibly stupid this tweet is, here’s a screenshot for posterity.
Apparently, the article was written because someone actually posed the question.
And they actually decided to address it.
Robin Andrews, senior contributor to Forbes Science received the email question and used the opportunity to (of course!) dunk on Trump supporters.
I was recently emailed a question that really is a sign of the times: namely, can lava kill the coronavirus? I don’t suspect that anyone, including the sender of said email, was planning to sterilise their house with lava. But I wouldn’t put it past the people who, erroneously lured by the president’s breathtakingly idiotic idea of consuming virus-annihilating bleach and disinfectant, were hoping to ingest something a little stronger in order to send SARS-Cov-2 packing. Lava is fortunately quite difficult to get your hands on, and personal supplies of the stuff are few and far between. Saying that, the simple answer is yes: lava would obliterate the coronavirus. But a more interesting response here involves a little detour into the history of heat-loving microbes.
Oh, look at that–Andrews includes in his article that Trump-supporting rubes are consuming bleach and disinfectants because the President made an off-hand comment about that the Media(D) twisted. When did President Trump say that people should “inject bleach” or “inhale Lysol”? That was all the media’s interpretation of his words.
But that’s what the partisan press is doing these days–create a straw man argument, imagine someone who believes it, attack them as stupid, then behave as though that’s accurate reporting. It’s the “Fine People Hoax” meets David Brooks’ “Flyover Man.”
We saw how this played out last time when the Media(D) attempted to blame Trump for an Arizona couple that consumed fish tank cleaner allegedly because the President had touted the use of hydroxychloroquine as a possible treatment for COVID-19 and it resulted in the man’s death. It turns out that there is something more to the story as the death is now being investigated by Mesa, AZ homicide detectives.
Did the Media(D) ever come clean on that one? Nope. Just like everything else that puts them in a bad light, they’ve memory-holed it.
This article by Andrews is following the same presumptions that the political reporters use–Trump supporters are by definition stupid.
Andrews’ article continues to contain some actual science and discusses how microbes can survive in inhospitable environments. In many respects, it was a reasonable article, but he just had to smash in the anti-Trump stuff to make sure that everyone knows that he is so much more intelligent than President Trump and his supporters.
He even concluded his article with another snide shot at those who might consider using some molten rock as a “disinfectant.”
Lava does appear to be a limit for life. Viruses, which aren’t technically lifeforms, can’t hack it either. So yes, lava would kill the new coronavirus. But for the love of all that is rational, please don’t try to kill SARS-CoV-2 with lava if you just happen to own any molten rock: the virus may perish, but your house, belongings or oesophagus wouldn’t survive the ordeal either. Source: Forbes
The question that should be posed to Andrews is who is the real idiot in this scenario?
The fictional Trump supporter whose ideas and stupidity Andrews pulled out of his own ass before ‘disproving’ him, or Andrews himself for thinking he’s a hero for destroying this made-up guy?
Because obviously, not a single Trump supporter has any idea about the basics of medical science. Not even, say, Dr. Carson, who famously performed that separation of conjoined twins.


clashdaily--2020-04-30--CROSSFIRE RAZOR: FBI Drafted Document To Formally Close Investigation On Flynn 3 WEEKS Before Interv

CROSSFIRE RAZOR: FBI Drafted Document To Formally Close Investigation On Flynn 3 WEEKS Before Interviewing Him

And there is enough of a clue buried in the code name they gave it to suggest they may have had a target bigger than Flynn in mind .
Remember how we weren ’ t getting any straight answers on just how many investigations were being conducted into the Trump team ?
But we ’ ll come back to that shortly .
General Flynn was a Trump supporter from fairly early on , so it shouldn ’ t surprise anyone that Trump put him on the Transition Team once he was elected .
It was a phone call he took @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was used to launch a smear that send him down a road to ruination .
Trending : De Blasio Tweet Singles Out Defiant Jews For Police Action — Ted Cruz Brings Him To TruthTown Now , as new evidence demonstrated conclusively yesterday , we know that there was a deliberate attempt by a handful of top FBI brass to see General Flynn either fired or charged with a crime .
This evidence has been hidden for the past three years… and the only reasonable explanation seems to be that hiding this was intentional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the story could get any worse from there .
But in this story , there has never yet been a moral bottom to which this cabal would not descend .
Smugly smirking Strzok is neck-deep in this mess .
The FBI was looking into Flynn ’ s actions in the first week of January , 2017 .
Finding nothing , they were in the process of closing the case… until someone stepped in to block that TWENTY MINUTES LATER .
The next tweet in that thread explains that this being a draft leaves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s ‘ gotcha ’ interview with Flynn occurred 3 weeks later… AFTER the case was considered ‘ closed ’ by whatever agent was working it .
Isn ’ t that interesting .
Cue all those ‘ what did he know and when did he know it ’ quotes the Libs like to kick around .
Nah It ’ s all probably nothing .
Certainly nothing ‘ Deep State-y ’ about it .
That final email Susan Rice sent to herself on Trump ’ s Inauguration Day takes on a different hue , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that in the message , Rice noted how Obama repeatedly emphasized during the meeting on Russia ’ s election hacking with Comey that he wants every aspect of the issue handled “ by the book.
” “ The President stressed that he is not asking about , initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective .
He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book , ” Rice wrote , according to an excerpt included in the senators ’ letter .
“ From a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Obama said he wants to be sure that , as we engage with the incoming [ Trump ] team , we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we can not share information fully as it relates to Russia.
” —The Hill No , really .
It ’ s , uh , perfectly normal to write a creepy CYA email like that as your last official act in the job .
Yeah , that ’ s the ticket .
What else have we got ?
Strzok saying ‘ don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ couple of minutes further down , he seems just a little bit on edge , doesn ’ t he ?
And here comes the infamous Seventh Floor into the story .
You remember them , don ’ t you ?
HOLY CRAP !
Tillerson Just Fired Most Of The 7th Floor Read the part in yellow on the tweet , but also notice the obvious relief on Strzok ’ s part , he actually said ‘ phew ’ , that it hadn ’ t been closed yet .
And because Strzok managed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Comey had his excuse to come in for the kill .
Remember when Schumer said that the Intelligence Community had ‘ six ways past Sunday at getting back at you ’ ?
How much did old Chucky know about this grand plan ?
This was CROSSFIRE RAZOR , right ?
And it specifically references ( in the document image from that first tweet by Kyle Cheney ) CROSSFIRE HURRICANE .
That was the investigation into Trump .
If Crossfire Razor is tainted by obvious malice , and we have the same Trump-hating players @ @ @ @ @ @ @ connected names .
Have we done a search on any and all investigations with ‘ crossfire ’ in their code name ?
Finally , is it possible — just POSSIBLE — that the real ‘ insurance policy ’ was their bogus case against Flynn , forcing Trump ’ s hand and making him look guilty of Russian Collusion by his close association to a many they had falsely charged ?
These rats really are dirty .
What do you think should happen to them ?
How far up does this go ?
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any repercussions in Joe Biden ’ s election chances ?

And there is enough of a clue buried in the code name they gave it to suggest they may have had a target bigger than Flynn in mind. Remember how we weren’t getting any straight answers on just how many investigations were being conducted into the Trump team? But we’ll come back to that shortly.
Let’s dive right in.
General Flynn was a Trump supporter from fairly early on, so it shouldn’t surprise anyone that Trump put him on the Transition Team once he was elected.
It was a phone call he took while acting in his official capacity that was used to launch a smear that send him down a road to ruination.
Now, as new evidence demonstrated conclusively yesterday, we know that there was a deliberate attempt by a handful of top FBI brass to see General Flynn either fired or charged with a crime. This evidence has been hidden for the past three years… and the only reasonable explanation seems to be that hiding this was intentional.
We didn’t really think the story could get any worse from there. But in this story, there has never yet been a moral bottom to which this cabal would not descend.
Smugly smirking Strzok is neck-deep in this mess.
The FBI was looking into Flynn’s actions in the first week of January, 2017. Finding nothing, they were in the process of closing the case… until someone stepped in to block that TWENTY MINUTES LATER.
Couple wrinkles: The document is a draft, it leaves open the prospect that it could be reopened if new information were discovered. Flynn was interviewed three weeks later. pic.twitter.com/DtFB63aFrw — Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) April 30, 2020
The next tweet in that thread explains that this being a draft leaves room for reopening, and that Comey’s ‘gotcha’ interview with Flynn occurred 3 weeks later… AFTER the case was considered ‘closed’ by whatever agent was working it.
Suddenly, a new player enters the game…
Note: Obama and Biden met with Comey the next day (1/5) to put the wheels in motion on the pee dossier. https://t.co/0FKh7JkoKk — Joel B. Pollak (@joelpollak) April 30, 2020
Isn’t that interesting. Cue all those ‘what did he know and when did he know it’ quotes the Libs like to kick around.
Nah It’s all probably nothing. Certainly nothing ‘Deep State-y’ about it.
That final email Susan Rice sent to herself on Trump’s Inauguration Day takes on a different hue, doesn’t it?
They said that in the message, Rice noted how Obama repeatedly emphasized during the meeting on Russia’s election hacking with Comey that he wants every aspect of the issue handled “by the book.” “The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book,” Rice wrote, according to an excerpt included in the senators’ letter. “From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming [Trump] team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.” —The Hill
No, really. It’s, uh, perfectly normal to write a creepy CYA email like that as your last official act in the job. Yeah, that’s the ticket.
What else have we got?
FBI Washington Field Office Report: FBI and US Govt (CIA?) databases showed "no derogatory information" on Flynn. Flynn determined to be "no longer a viable candidate" as part of the Crossfire Hurricane case. pic.twitter.com/5RfnnjucOp — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) April 30, 2020
(From the photo attached:)
Strzok saying ‘don’t close Razor’. Reading a couple of minutes further down, he seems just a little bit on edge, doesn’t he?
And here comes the infamous Seventh Floor into the story. You remember them, don’t you?
HOLY CRAP! Tillerson Just Fired Most Of The 7th Floor
Logan Act theory coincides w/ Page/Strzok texts on 1/4/17 (same day Flynn file was to be closed) about Logan Act. HT Excellent @CasualSemi Read the Crossfire Razor FBI Field Office Memo/Texts/emails here:https://t.co/F3je6Q43ZG pic.twitter.com/gohbjJqg9L — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) April 30, 2020
Read the part in yellow on the tweet, but also notice the obvious relief on Strzok’s part, he actually said ‘phew’, that it hadn’t been closed yet.
And because Strzok managed to catch that door before it closed, Comey had his excuse to come in for the kill.
Watch @Comey’s extraordinary smugness as he discusses the @GenFlynn set up. He literally brags it was “something I probably wouldn't have done & maybe gotten away with…" with other Administrations. pic.twitter.com/IDmYpPcOND — Cliff Sims (@Cliff_Sims) April 30, 2020
Remember when Schumer said that the Intelligence Community had ‘six ways past Sunday at getting back at you’? How much did old Chucky know about this grand plan?
In conclusion…
This was CROSSFIRE RAZOR, right? And it specifically references (in the document image from that first tweet by Kyle Cheney) CROSSFIRE HURRICANE. That was the investigation into Trump.
If Crossfire Razor is tainted by obvious malice, and we have the same Trump-hating players looking into both ‘investigations’ with connected names. Have we done a search on any and all investigations with ‘crossfire’ in their code name?
Finally, is it possible — just POSSIBLE — that the real ‘insurance policy’ was their bogus case against Flynn, forcing Trump’s hand and making him look guilty of Russian Collusion by his close association to a many they had falsely charged?
These rats really are dirty. What do you think should happen to them?
How far up does this go?
And — plot twist — will this have any repercussions in Joe Biden’s election chances?


clashdaily--2020-04-30--WATCH: Meet America’s Gestapo – The Cops Who Threaten Mommies

Notice they never quite get around to answering her questions .
But they took note in their record that SHE was being uncooperative .
Would YOU have handled this interaction as calmly as ‘ Amy ’ here did ?
Or would you have gotten a lot more loud ?
Trending : De Blasio Tweet Singles Out Defiant Jews For Police Action — Ted Cruz Brings Him To TruthTown To summarize the interaction , which lasted all of 3 minutes : • Deputy introduces himself to Amy ( by name ) and asks if she ’ s aware of the ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says ‘ yes ’ .
He emphasizes that it is by the Government , of Wisconsin .
• He asks if he needs to explain that ( the stay at home order ) to her , telling her that he can do so .
( Amy does not . )
• She referenced a conversation with an officer 2 weeks earlier where an officer said they were not enforcing that order .
The deputy said ‘ oh , we ’ re about to ’ .
Now we get to the reason for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to play at other people ’ s homes and you ’ re allowing that to happen.
” Some back-and-forth and he says , ‘ Stop having your kid go by other people ’ s homes.
’ He seemed about ready to move on .
Amy asked if there was anything else .
He says ‘ Nope .
That was it.
’ [ That was definitely NOT ‘ it ’ . ]
Lady cop asked for Amy ’ s particulars .
Without being either rude or aggressive , Amy matter-of-factly inquired about why that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Last name , Amy , what ’ s your last name ?
” Amy : ( slightly flustered ) “ I ’ m not — do you — is there a reason you ’ re asking for it ?
” Lady cop explains this will be going into some official paperwork .
Amy : Is there a reason for it ?
Guy cop : Yup .
Cuz you ’ re violating a State order .
LC : ( to Amy ) That ’ s what I ’ m talking about .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you ’ re violating an order… LC : … we ’ re gonnna have to have documention on our [ screen ( ? )
] with your name on it because we ’ re here talking to you about that , that you said you ’ ve just acknowledged so then there ’ s docume– Amy : I would like to see the law that requires me to give you that information .
LC [ shakes head in apparent annoyance .
Guy cop reads off plates .
Lady Cop jots it down and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : ) What is your middle initial ?
Amy : I don ’ t believe that I ’ m required to give that to you .
Are we done here ?
LC : emphatically , No we ’ re not .
Your middle initial and your last name .
For full and proper context , there is a longer clip giving a little more background on what happened that was so outrageous , specifically the video that had been clipped out of the shorter one , above .
To summarize , Amy ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when the police showed up .
It ’ s pretty clear from the context that Lady Cop was on that call .
Kid phoned home to tell mom that police were at that the house .
Police had the kid hang up the phone .
LC : ” When there is law enforcement at someone ’ s home dealing with a situation , that is not a time for someone to walk up and confront an officer — Amy : I did not confront you .
LC : What do you call that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what ?
Because I came over there to get the dogs ?
I went over there to get the dogs .
I asked you why you had my daughter hang up the phone .
Amy : Are we done here ?
[ repeated some time as LC continues talking down to her ] LC : Middle initial and last name .
Amy : I ’ m not giving it to you .
I haven ’ t done anything wrong .
LC : Why be immature and play games ?
Amy : Because I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t done anything wrong .
At this point the conversation rejoins the content of the shorter clip .
You ’ ll notice that LC never did get around to answering Amy ’ s question .
She simply expected blind compliance .
Congrats anonymous butthurt LadyCop .
You ’ re famous now .
You must be so proud .

Notice they never quite get around to answering her questions. But they took note in their record that SHE was being uncooperative.
Would YOU have handled this interaction as calmly as ‘Amy’ here did?
Or would you have gotten a lot more loud?
To summarize the interaction, which lasted all of 3 minutes:
Deputy introduces himself to Amy (by name) and asks if she’s aware of the ‘Stay at home order’. She says ‘yes’. He emphasizes that it is by the Government, of Wisconsin.
He asks if he needs to explain that (the stay at home order) to her, telling her that he can do so. (Amy does not.)
She referenced a conversation with an officer 2 weeks earlier where an officer said they were not enforcing that order. The deputy said ‘oh, we’re about to’.
Now we get to the reason for the visit:
“Your daughter is going to play at other people’s homes and you’re allowing that to happen.”
Some back-and-forth and he says, ‘Stop having your kid go by other people’s homes.’ He seemed about ready to move on. Amy asked if there was anything else. He says ‘Nope. That was it.’
[That was definitely NOT ‘it’.]
Lady cop asked for Amy’s particulars. Without being either rude or aggressive, Amy matter-of-factly inquired about why that should be necessary.
Lady cop: “Last name, Amy, what’s your last name?” Amy: (slightly flustered) “I’m not — do you — is there a reason you’re asking for it?” Lady cop explains this will be going into some official paperwork. Amy: Is there a reason for it? Guy cop: Yup. Cuz you’re violating a State order.
LC: (to Amy) That’s what I’m talking about. If you’ll let me finish… because you’re violating an order… Amy: I haven’t violated an order LC: … we’re gonnna have to have documention on our [screen(?)] with your name on it because we’re here talking to you about that, that you said you’ve just acknowledged so then there’s docume– Amy: I would like to see the law that requires me to give you that information. LC [shakes head in apparent annoyance. Guy cop reads off plates. Lady Cop jots it down and thanks him.] (To Amy:) What is your middle initial? Amy: I don’t believe that I’m required to give that to you. Are we done here? LC: emphatically, No we’re not. Your middle initial and your last name.
[recording is cut, and resumes.]
LC [Brief chatter with GC who appears to have run the plates before turning back to Amy]” K. We’ve got it. Amy: Ok. LC: And that’ll be documented too, that you were uncooperative. Amy: Ok.
For full and proper context, there is a longer clip giving a little more background on what happened that was so outrageous, specifically the video that had been clipped out of the shorter one, above.
To summarize, Amy’s daughter was visiting some nearby neighbors when the police showed up. It’s pretty clear from the context that Lady Cop was on that call. Kid phoned home to tell mom that police were at that the house. Police had the kid hang up the phone.
LC:”When there is law enforcement at someone’s home dealing with a situation, that is not a time for someone to walk up and confront an officer — Amy: I did not confront you. LC: What do you call that? Amy: What do I call what? Because I came over there to get the dogs? I went over there to get the dogs. I asked you why you had my daughter hang up the phone. [Back-and-forth chatter. Some condescending sniping from LC.] Amy: Are we done here? [repeated some time as LC continues talking down to her] LC: No, we’re not. Amy: Ok. LC: Middle initial and last name. Amy: I’m not giving it to you. I haven’t done anything wrong. LC: Why be immature and play games? Amy: Because I believe this is harassment. I haven’t done anything wrong.
At this point the conversation rejoins the content of the shorter clip.
Wow.
You’ll notice that LC never did get around to answering Amy’s question. She simply expected blind compliance.
Congrats anonymous butthurt LadyCop. You’re famous now. You must be so proud.


clashdaily--2020-04-30--COVID TYRANNY: City Tells Family Members To Stop ‘Window Visits’ At Nursing Homes–No, This Is Not Sa

COVID TYRANNY: City Tells Family Members To Stop ‘Window Visits’ At Nursing Homes–No, This Is Not Satire

Do these people have no hearts ?
This article looks like it could be something from the satire website The Babylon Bee , but it isn ’ t and that ’ s pretty astounding .
Long-term care facilities around the world have been hit very hard with the coronavirus pandemic .
Once the virus enters a nursing home or similar seniors facility , there is an inevitable massive loss of life .
Many countries are reporting that the vast majority of fatalities due to COVID-19 have been in facilities that provide care for the elderly .
Canada is no exception @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the majority of COVID deaths have occurred in long-term care facilities .
Governor Andrew Cuomo is facing heat over his decision to force nursing homes to admit COVID-positive residents and sending them there with body bags .
The virus spread like wildfire in the facilities and so many unnecessary deaths occurred in those places .
Trending : De Blasio Tweet Singles Out Defiant Jews For Police Action — Ted Cruz Brings Him To TruthTown Families have been hit hard with as visiting has been severely restricted or outright prohibited to prevent the spread @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the facilities .
The Public Health Agency of Canada has issued rigorous guidelines for preventing the spread of the virus which includes frequent testing and , as much as possible , preventing employees from working at more than one facility .
Now , Ottawa , Canada ’ s capital city , has pushed the regulations even further by restricting “ window visits ” from family members at the city-run facilities .
It has become an iconic image of the COVID-19 pandemic — a family member waving to an elderly loved one through the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Even Ontario Premier Doug Ford has talked about his wife visiting her mother that way .
But it will no longer be an option for families with loved ones in long-term care homes run by the City of Ottawa .
In a memo this week , Dean Lett , director of long-term care for the city , asked families to stop visiting their loved ones at windows “ to help ensure that physical distancing remains in place for all our residents.
” The news has devastated family members who say the visits are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anxious and isolated loved ones whom they ’ ve been unable to see in person during the pandemic .
Many of them do not respond to electronic communications the same way , say families .
Here ’ s a question for the COVIDiots running the show up there in Ottawa : How can you “ physically distance ” more than waving through a window ?
Some of the stories profiled in the Ottawa Citizen article are absolutely heartbreaking–a wife unable to visit her husband , a daughter unable to see her mother with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to see her , and a 92-year old husband who would go almost daily to wave goodnight to his 89-year old wife through the window as she was taken to her room to prepare for bed .
Prior to the lockdown , the 92-year old man and his daughter had visited his wife daily for 6 years .
Using technology for those with cognitive decline can be extremely difficult and frustrating .
Remember , these are literally visits to people outside of the facility while the residents who are at risk stay quarantined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Lett said the decision to limit visits outside of the homes “ is based on prioritizing the safety and health of residents and staff .
We have experienced a number of situations where families have visited and have not respected the requirement for physical distancing as directed through public health agencies.
” Lett added that the city-run homes have deployed additional staff and increased access to technology to assist residents to keep in touch with their loved ones through Skype , phone calls , emails and letters .
“ We know the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been so difficult for families and residents , ” he said .
“ Families are encouraged to connect with staff to schedule regular opportunities to connect with their loved ones.
” … …Lett said the decision to stop window visits was difficult , but added : “ With the effects that we have seen the virus have on long-term care homes across the country , we have a responsibility to do everything possible to minimize the risks of COVID-19 from entering the homes and to protect the safety of residents and staff.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heartless decision on the part of the City of Ottawa .
But then , we shouldn ’ t be surprised at that .
The city has cracked down hard on residents .
City parks are technically closed and playground or sports equipment is not to be used , but according to the City of Ottawa website , people are still permitted to walk through them–unless they aren ’ t .
One man was fined $ 880 for walking his dog in a park , and another man who let his 4-year old autistic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was warned by bylaw enforcement officers that he could face a $ 700 ticket if he allowed it to happen again .
Ottawa ’ s Associate Medical Officer of Health has said that people are finding social distancing “ loopholes ” like having a beer on their driveway or talking to a neighbor over the fence .
Those nefarious activities on your own property could lead to a social gathering of more than 5 people which is completely verboten in Ottawa .
Those leaders in Ottawa make Gov .
Gretchen “ That Woman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and completely reasonable in comparison .
Let ’ s hope that some of those Canucks in their nation ’ s capital shake off their Canadian “ niceness ” and push back against this abuse of authority from the “ experts ” and allow them to visit family members in front of a closed window while their loved ones are still around to see them .
After all , you don ’ t know how long they ’ ve got left .
City of Ottawa long-term care homes will allow “ window visits.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Public Health prior to implementing the rule .

Do these people have no hearts?
This article looks like it could be something from the satire website The Babylon Bee, but it isn’t and that’s pretty astounding.
Long-term care facilities around the world have been hit very hard with the coronavirus pandemic. Once the virus enters a nursing home or similar seniors facility, there is an inevitable massive loss of life. Many countries are reporting that the vast majority of fatalities due to COVID-19 have been in facilities that provide care for the elderly. Canada is no exception. Recently, Canadian news reported that the majority of COVID deaths have occurred in long-term care facilities.
Governor Andrew Cuomo is facing heat over his decision to force nursing homes to admit COVID-positive residents and sending them there with body bags. The virus spread like wildfire in the facilities and so many unnecessary deaths occurred in those places.
Families have been hit hard with as visiting has been severely restricted or outright prohibited to prevent the spread of the virus by asymptomatic carriers entering the facilities.
The Public Health Agency of Canada has issued rigorous guidelines for preventing the spread of the virus which includes frequent testing and, as much as possible, preventing employees from working at more than one facility.
Now, Ottawa, Canada’s capital city, has pushed the regulations even further by restricting “window visits” from family members at the city-run facilities.
It has become an iconic image of the COVID-19 pandemic — a family member waving to an elderly loved one through the window of their long-term care home. Even Ontario Premier Doug Ford has talked about his wife visiting her mother that way. But it will no longer be an option for families with loved ones in long-term care homes run by the City of Ottawa. In a memo this week, Dean Lett, director of long-term care for the city, asked families to stop visiting their loved ones at windows “to help ensure that physical distancing remains in place for all our residents.” The news has devastated family members who say the visits are the only remaining connection they have with anxious and isolated loved ones whom they’ve been unable to see in person during the pandemic. Many of them do not respond to electronic communications the same way, say families.
Here’s a question for the COVIDiots running the show up there in Ottawa: How can you “physically distance” more than waving through a window?
Some of the stories profiled in the Ottawa Citizen article are absolutely heartbreaking–a wife unable to visit her husband, a daughter unable to see her mother with Alzheimer’s Disease has been asking to see her, and a 92-year old husband who would go almost daily to wave goodnight to his 89-year old wife through the window as she was taken to her room to prepare for bed. Prior to the lockdown, the 92-year old man and his daughter had visited his wife daily for 6 years.
Using technology for those with cognitive decline can be extremely difficult and frustrating.
Remember, these are literally visits to people outside of the facility while the residents who are at risk stay quarantined on the inside.
In a statement, Lett said the decision to limit visits outside of the homes “is based on prioritizing the safety and health of residents and staff. We have experienced a number of situations where families have visited and have not respected the requirement for physical distancing as directed through public health agencies.” Lett added that the city-run homes have deployed additional staff and increased access to technology to assist residents to keep in touch with their loved ones through Skype, phone calls, emails and letters. “We know the lack of connection during the pandemic has been so difficult for families and residents,” he said. “Families are encouraged to connect with staff to schedule regular opportunities to connect with their loved ones.”… …Lett said the decision to stop window visits was difficult, but added: “With the effects that we have seen the virus have on long-term care homes across the country, we have a responsibility to do everything possible to minimize the risks of COVID-19 from entering the homes and to protect the safety of residents and staff.”
Source: Ottawa Citizen
This is a heartless decision on the part of the City of Ottawa.
But then, we shouldn’t be surprised at that.
The city has cracked down hard on residents. City parks are technically closed and playground or sports equipment is not to be used, but according to the City of Ottawa website, people are still permitted to walk through them–unless they aren’t. One man was fined $880 for walking his dog in a park, and another man who let his 4-year old autistic son play soccer in an empty field was warned by bylaw enforcement officers that he could face a $700 ticket if he allowed it to happen again. Ottawa’s Associate Medical Officer of Health has said that people are finding social distancing “loopholes” like having a beer on their driveway or talking to a neighbor over the fence. Those nefarious activities on your own property could lead to a social gathering of more than 5 people which is completely verboten in Ottawa.
Those leaders in Ottawa make Gov. Gretchen “That Woman From Michigan” Whitmer look positively placid and completely reasonable in comparison.
Let’s hope that some of those Canucks in their nation’s capital shake off their Canadian “niceness” and push back against this abuse of authority from the “experts” and allow them to visit family members in front of a closed window while their loved ones are still around to see them. After all, you don’t know how long they’ve got left.
***UPDATE: Thursday, April 30, 3:00 pm Eastern
City of Ottawa long-term care homes will allow “window visits.” They apparently had not spoken to Ottawa Public Health prior to implementing the rule.
Ottawa long-term care window visits to be reinstated after ban: Mayor (To say nothing of @fordnation rightly blowing a gasket over such a ridiculous, cruel decision. They didn't even talk to Ottawa Public Health before they imposed it.) https://t.co/mekkOGla5V #onpoli #cdnpoli — Lorrie Goldstein (@sunlorrie) April 30, 2020
END UPDATE***


clashdaily--2020-04-30--Famous Doctor Blasts Gov. Abbott – Tells Churches & Businesses To Ignore Orders

Let Freedom Ring — even in your Cash Register !
That ’ s right , folks .
The threat we were told would surely devour us never materialized .
Texans have humored the fears of the ‘ experts ’ long enough .
We ’ ve all learned what the virus is — and isn ’ t — and at least one prominent figure , Dr. Steve Hotze , is tired of seeing Texans wait hat-in-hand for the government to give them their liberty back .
He ’ s calling on Texans to flex those God-given freedoms of theirs and get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : De Blasio Tweet Singles Out Defiant Jews For Police Action — Ted Cruz Brings Him To TruthTown This is the battle of our lifetime .
Governor Abbott ’ s unconstitutional lock down of Texas businesses has destroyed the Texas economy .
Within the last month over 1.3 million Texans have lost their jobs and thousands of churches have been forced to stop their services .
Abbott ’ s recent recommendation to start some businesses operating at 25 % capacity is pathetically weak and gives no hope to starving businesses .
We must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to school and back to church .
Enough is enough .
I have filed a lawsuit against Governor Abbott which is styledHotze et .
al .
v Abbott .
It has been filed in Travis County State District Court .
Travis County is the home seat of Austin and all lawsuits against state government officials must be filed in Travis County .
We already have over 200 individuals , pastors , churches , and businesses who have joined with me as plaintiffs in this lawsuit against Governor Abbott for his violation of our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and churches without government interference .
This lawsuit is petitioning the court to rule Abbott ’ s actions unconstitutional based upon Article 1 Section 28 of the Texas Constitution .
“ No power of suspending laws in this State shall be exercised except by the Legislature.
” These laws include our constitutional rights to operate our businesses and conduct church services in the manner we choose .
I would like you to join with me and other Texas Patriots as a plaintiff in my lawsuit .
You will be charged NO fee when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me at sfh @ hotzehwc.com with your name , your organization ’ s name if you are a church or business , along with your address and contact phone number .
Forward this to other Texas patriots .
“ Through God we shall do valiantly , and it is He who will tread down our adversaries.
” Psalm 108:13 Let ’ s press this battle to its successful conclusion .
Committed to restoring our God-given , unalienable Constitutional rights , I remain , as always ,

Let Freedom Ring — even in your Cash Register!
That’s right, folks. The threat we were told would surely devour us never materialized.
Texans have humored the fears of the ‘experts’ long enough. We’ve all learned what the virus is — and isn’t — and at least one prominent figure, Dr. Steve Hotze, is tired of seeing Texans wait hat-in-hand for the government to give them their liberty back.
He’s calling on Texans to flex those God-given freedoms of theirs and get back to living their lives.
Here’s his video:
Here’s his written appeal:
Dear Texas Patriots,
This is the battle of our lifetime.
Governor Abbott’s unconstitutional lock down of Texas businesses has destroyed the Texas economy. Within the last month over 1.3 million Texans have lost their jobs and thousands of churches have been forced to stop their services. Abbott’s recent recommendation to start some businesses operating at 25% capacity is pathetically weak and gives no hope to starving businesses.
We must get Texans back to work, back to school and back to church.
Enough is enough. I have filed a lawsuit against Governor Abbott which is styledHotze et. al. v Abbott. It has been filed in Travis County State District Court. Travis County is the home seat of Austin and all lawsuits against state government officials must be filed in Travis County.
We already have over 200 individuals, pastors, churches, and businesses who have joined with me as plaintiffs in this lawsuit against Governor Abbott for his violation of our constitutional rights to freely operate our businesses and churches without government interference.
This lawsuit is petitioning the court to rule Abbott’s actions unconstitutional based upon Article 1 Section 28 of the Texas Constitution. “No power of suspending laws in this State shall be exercised except by the Legislature.” These laws include our constitutional rights to operate our businesses and conduct church services in the manner we choose.
I would like you to join with me and other Texas Patriots as a plaintiff in my lawsuit. You will be charged NO fee when you join the suit. Simply email me at sfh@hotzehwc.com with your name, your organization’s name if you are a church or business, along with your address and contact phone number.
Forward this to other Texas patriots.
“Through God we shall do valiantly, and it is He who will tread down our adversaries.” Psalm 108:13
Let’s press this battle to its successful conclusion.
Committed to restoring our God-given, unalienable Constitutional rights, I remain, as always,
Sincerely yours,
Steven F. Hotze, M.D.
CEO
Conservative Republicans of Texas
President
Texans Back to Work


clashdaily--2020-04-30--WATCH: Nancy Pelosi’s ‘Believe All Women’ Stance Flip-Flops When The Accused Is Joe Biden, Not Brett

WATCH: Nancy Pelosi’s ‘Believe All Women’ Stance Flip-Flops When The Accused Is Joe Biden, Not Brett Kavanaugh

Speaker Pelosi told a reporter from The Washington Examiner that she “ doesn ’ t need a lecture or a speech ” when she was asked about the double-standard that Democrats are using regarding the “ Believe All Women ” slogan that they all stood behind during the Kavanaugh confirmation .
Trending : De Blasio Tweet Singles Out Defiant Jews For Police Action — Ted Cruz Brings Him To TruthTown Actually , that ’ s precisely what she needs .
She needs to either condemn Joe Biden and stand by Tara Reade as her commitment to “ believing survivors ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ admit that due process rights are to be afforded to all people no matter what party they belong to and apologize for weaponizing the MeToo movement as a political move to attack a Republican Supreme Court Nominee .
Anything less then either of those options is politcal gamesmanship .
Gee , what could have possibly changed to make Speaker Pelosi shift her position ?
It couldn ’ t be the political party that the accused is affiliated with , could it ?
No , that couldn ’ t possibly be it .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , then .
Brett Kavanaugh was accused by Christine Blasey Ford of pushing her on a bed and trying to grope her while he was a drunk teenager .
The additional accusations were by Deborah Ramirez , who accused him of waving “ Little Brett ” in her face at a college party but didn ’ t include any contact , and the Julie Swetnik accusation that Kavanaugh was running a gang-rape ring at house parties when he was a high school sophomore was just ridiculous .
Joe Biden , on the other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a subordinate ( a Senate aide ) when he 51 years old and a sitting U.S .
Senator .
He had been the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee while Clarence Thomas was accused of sexual harassment just a couple of years before the alleged incident .
Well , that couldn ’ t be it .
The Biden accusation seems to be much more serious .
Clearly , it ’ s the credibility of the accusation , right ?
Christine Blasey Ford had no corroborating witnesses and every single person that she named @ @ @ @ @ @ @ allegedly took place even happened .
She didn ’ t know where or whose house it was , the date , who else was there , how she got home , or any other details .
There is not any evidence that Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh had ever actually met .
Tara Reade , Biden ’ s accuser , has allegedly filed a report , spoke to her family , over the years gave accounts to various people and several have come forward corroborating her story .
Most recently , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Biden–said that Reade recounted the sexual assault accusation and the silencing that she endured just a couple of years after the incident .
There is also video of an unnamed woman that Reade claims is her mother , calling Larry King Live asking what recourse a Congressional staffer has if their complaints against a “ well-respected ” Senator are ignored .
Oh , dear !
It looks like the Biden accusation is ridiculous as well .
Despite this , a video of Speaker Pelosi heartily endorsing the presumptive Democratic nominee was uploaded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Monday .
The Biden campaign put out a statement denying Reade ’ s allegation but Joe himself has not publicly addressed it , and despite several appearances on cable news shows that he has done after Reade came forward , he has not been directly asked about it .
Now that the Reade accusation has become impossible to ignore , Democrats including Pelosi are finally being questioned about where they stand .
This morning on CNN , Speaker Pelosi appeared on CNN and said that she was “ satisfied ” with the way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t actually respond yet .
This is Speaker Pelosi ’ s new line .
Watch her say as much to MSNBC host Ari Melber on April 17 : Melber , to his credit , is actually covering Reade ’ s accusation .
Granted , it isn ’ t the hair-on-fire way that MSNBC was breathlessly reporting all of the Kavanaugh accusations and promoting “ Believe All Women.
” Here is Melber giving it a reasonable summary : Back in September 2018 , Speaker Pelosi made her views on Christine Blasey Ford ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Brett Kavanaugh .
She said that women deserve to be heard and believed .
PELOSI : We ’ re here to stand in support of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and to applaud her courage as she prepares to tell her story… …What ’ s happening here has lifetime impact .
The crimes themselves–the allegations that have been made are about offenses that have a lifetime impact .
And a person whose name is being put forward for a lifetime service on the Supreme Court .
It ’ s not right .
So there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ One equity is the integrity of the Supreme Court the other equity to be weighed is the respect that we have for women when they come forward… …They ’ re [ Senate Republicans ] so afraid of the truth and they ’ re so afraid of a woman , Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and the truth that she will stell–tell .
So , right now , since we called this press conference , other relega–uh , allegations have come forward .
We join–I join , Leader Schumer in calling for Judge Kavanaugh to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he does not , at the very least , this hearing should be postponed because other allegations have come forth .
We insist on investigation–it ’ s not… it ’ s a vetting by the FBI , the normal vetting of the FBI of a federal appointee , in this case , for life , to the Supreme Court… …If the Republican members of the Committee–the Judiciary Committee in the Senate decide to go forward they have to know that they are having a demoralizing impact on and a chilling effect on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ telling their stories and demanding justice .
These men , they just can ’ t possibly know… …In any event , we are here to show our solidarity , we ’ re here to show our respect for all women who have a case–have it respected , for due process , to investigate , to find the truth , not fear it and also to remember the responsibility we to the integrity of the Supreme Court .
She ’ s comfortable with tossing aside Kavanaugh as a possible Supreme Court Justice because it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ integrity of the Supreme Court , but the Presidency ?
Eh , Bill Clinton pretty much brought a wrecking ball to that office with a cigar and an intern and that ’ s only because of Matt Drudge ’ s reporting .
Otherwise , the Media ( D ) would try to cover it up as they did with JFK ’ s sexual escapades , and as they tried to do with the sexual assault accusation by Tara Reade .
And then , there were the tweets by Pelosi .
Suddenly , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so Pelosi is backing the hair-sniffing , kissy , too handsy , makes-women-uncomfortable , skinny-dipping-in-front-of-female-Secret-Service-agents kind of a guy .
That seems rational and completely consistent with her previous “ Believe all women ” , right ?
Now watch Speaker Pelosi ’ s endorsement video and how she tries to keep a smile pasted onto her face as she reads the teleprompter .
She doesn ’ t even believe what she ’ s saying .
That part where she says , “ I am proud to endorse Joe Biden for President–a leader who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , values , authenticity , and integrity ” is particularly cringe-inducing .
But this is the candidate that the Democrats chose .
The race to November is going to be quite interesting as we watch Democrats completely contradict themselves to back a terrible candidate as Speaker Pelosi has just done .

***UPDATE: Thursday, April 30, 1:40 pm Eastern
Speaker Pelosi told a reporter from The Washington Examiner that she “doesn’t need a lecture or a speech” when she was asked about the double-standard that Democrats are using regarding the “Believe All Women” slogan that they all stood behind during the Kavanaugh confirmation.
"I don’t need a lecture or a speech.” That was @SpeakerPelosi's response after the Washington Examiner's @KerryPicket asked if there was a double standard concerning sexual assault allegation against @JoeBiden. pic.twitter.com/b2Ftq3QTKT — Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) April 30, 2020
Actually, that’s precisely what she needs. She needs to either condemn Joe Biden and stand by Tara Reade as her commitment to “believing survivors” made her do in 2018, or admit that due process rights are to be afforded to all people no matter what party they belong to and apologize for weaponizing the MeToo movement as a political move to attack a Republican Supreme Court Nominee. Anything less then either of those options is politcal gamesmanship.
END UPDATE***
Gee, what could have possibly changed to make Speaker Pelosi shift her position?
It couldn’t be the political party that the accused is affiliated with, could it?
No, that couldn’t possibly be it.
It must be the severity of the accusation, then.
Brett Kavanaugh was accused by Christine Blasey Ford of pushing her on a bed and trying to grope her while he was a drunk teenager. The additional accusations were by Deborah Ramirez, who accused him of waving “Little Brett” in her face at a college party but didn’t include any contact, and the Julie Swetnik accusation that Kavanaugh was running a gang-rape ring at house parties when he was a high school sophomore was just ridiculous.
Joe Biden, on the other hand, is accused of digitally raping a subordinate (a Senate aide) when he 51 years old and a sitting U.S. Senator. He had been the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee while Clarence Thomas was accused of sexual harassment just a couple of years before the alleged incident.
Well, that couldn’t be it. The Biden accusation seems to be much more serious.
Clearly, it’s the credibility of the accusation, right? Christine Blasey Ford had no corroborating witnesses and every single person that she named denied the house party where the incident allegedly took place even happened. She didn’t know where or whose house it was, the date, who else was there, how she got home, or any other details. There is not any evidence that Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh had ever actually met.
Tara Reade, Biden’s accuser, has allegedly filed a report, spoke to her family, over the years gave accounts to various people and several have come forward corroborating her story. Most recently, a former neighbor–a Democrat who plans on voting for Biden–said that Reade recounted the sexual assault accusation and the silencing that she endured just a couple of years after the incident. There is also video of an unnamed woman that Reade claims is her mother, calling Larry King Live asking what recourse a Congressional staffer has if their complaints against a “well-respected” Senator are ignored.
Oh, dear! It looks like the Biden accusation is ridiculous as well.
Despite this, a video of Speaker Pelosi heartily endorsing the presumptive Democratic nominee was uploaded to Biden’s YouTube channel on Monday.
The Biden campaign put out a statement denying Reade’s allegation but Joe himself has not publicly addressed it, and despite several appearances on cable news shows that he has done after Reade came forward, he has not been directly asked about it.
Now that the Reade accusation has become impossible to ignore, Democrats including Pelosi are finally being questioned about where they stand.
This morning on CNN, Speaker Pelosi appeared on CNN and said that she was “satisfied” with the way that he responded.
“I’m satisfied with how he has responded,” Pelosi says. Biden has literally not uttered one word about the allegation. https://t.co/CGOyP2vWVW — Guy Benson (@guypbenson) April 30, 2020
Ummm… he didn’t actually respond yet.
This is Speaker Pelosi’s new line. Watch her say as much to MSNBC host Ari Melber on April 17:
Melber, to his credit, is actually covering Reade’s accusation. Granted, it isn’t the hair-on-fire way that MSNBC was breathlessly reporting all of the Kavanaugh accusations and promoting “Believe All Women.”
Here is Melber giving it a reasonable summary:
Back in September 2018, Speaker Pelosi made her views on Christine Blasey Ford’s so-called “credible” accusation against Brett Kavanaugh. She said that women deserve to be heard and believed.
PELOSI: We’re here to stand in support of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and to applaud her courage as she prepares to tell her story…
…What’s happening here has lifetime impact. The crimes themselves–the allegations that have been made are about offenses that have a lifetime impact. And a person whose name is being put forward for a lifetime service on the Supreme Court. It’s not right.
So there are two equities to be weighed. One equity is the integrity of the Supreme Court the other equity to be weighed is the respect that we have for women when they come forward…
[Blah, blah, blah. Stammer, stammer, stammer. Politics, politics, politics. Blah, blah, blah.]
…They’re [Senate Republicans] so afraid of the truth and they’re so afraid of a woman, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and the truth that she will stell–tell.
So, right now, since we called this press conference, other relega–uh, allegations have come forward. We join–I join, Leader Schumer in calling for Judge Kavanaugh to withdraw his name from consideration. If he does not, at the very least, this hearing should be postponed because other allegations have come forth. We insist on investigation–it’s not… it’s a vetting by the FBI, the normal vetting of the FBI of a federal appointee, in this case, for life, to the Supreme Court…
…If the Republican members of the Committee–the Judiciary Committee in the Senate decide to go forward they have to know that they are having a demoralizing impact on and a chilling effect on the entire movement of courageous women who are telling their stories and demanding justice. These men, they just can’t possibly know…
[Blah, blah, blah. Senator Orrin Hatch is a hypocrite. Blah, blah, blah.]
…In any event, we are here to show our solidarity, we’re here to show our respect for all women who have a case–have it respected, for due process, to investigate, to find the truth, not fear it and also to remember the responsibility we to the integrity of the Supreme Court.
She’s comfortable with tossing aside Kavanaugh as a possible Supreme Court Justice because it’s so important to maintain the integrity of the Supreme Court, but the Presidency? Eh, Bill Clinton pretty much brought a wrecking ball to that office with a cigar and an intern and that’s only because of Matt Drudge’s reporting. Otherwise, the Media(D) would try to cover it up as they did with JFK’s sexual escapades, and as they tried to do with the sexual assault accusation by Tara Reade.
And then, there were the tweets by Pelosi.
I applaud the courage of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford to come forward to share her story. As we continue to learn more about these allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, we must ensure that Dr. Ford’s rights to justice & privacy are respected. #PostponeTheVote — Nancy Pelosi (@SpeakerPelosi) September 16, 2018
Every American should be concerned about what the debate around the allegations against Brett Kavanaugh says to young people across our country. We should stand with survivors – not punish them when they decide to speak out. #BelieveSurvivors https://t.co/g4sV8Oidom — Nancy Pelosi (@SpeakerPelosi) September 25, 2018
Dr. Blasey Ford, we are with you. #BelieveSurvivors — Nancy Pelosi (@TeamPelosi) September 27, 2018
Suddenly, it’s inconvenient to #BelieveSurvivors, so Pelosi is backing the hair-sniffing, kissy, too handsy, makes-women-uncomfortable, skinny-dipping-in-front-of-female-Secret-Service-agents kind of a guy.
That seems rational and completely consistent with her previous “Believe all women”, right?
Now watch Speaker Pelosi’s endorsement video and how she tries to keep a smile pasted onto her face as she reads the teleprompter.
She doesn’t even believe what she’s saying.
That part where she says, “I am proud to endorse Joe Biden for President–a leader who is the personification of hope and courage, values, authenticity, and integrity” is particularly cringe-inducing.
But this is the candidate that the Democrats chose.
The race to November is going to be quite interesting as we watch Democrats completely contradict themselves to back a terrible candidate as Speaker Pelosi has just done.