clashdaily--2020-01-24--Lying Billionaires and Gun Control

Lying Billionaires and Gun Control

I listened to Billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg ’ s remarks after the attack at the West Freeway Church of Christ in Texas .
I paraphrase , but you can check the video of his remarks for yourself * ‘ It is the job of law enforcement to have guns and to decide when to shoot .
You don ’ t want average citizens to have guns in public .
That is the job of the police.
’ This was a prepared speech so we have to assume Mayor Bloomberg meant what he said .
One mistake is an accident , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or more falsehoods are propaganda .
I had hope for Mayor Bloomberg , but , sadly , this qualifies as propaganda .
To his credit , Mayor Bloomberg is probably telling us what he knows , but you know things that the Mayor doesn ’ t .
You know how to defend yourself and your family .
I ’ ve taught beginners to handle firearms .
My students have been properly intimidated by the moral weight of the gun .
My student ’ s questions change with time in a consistent pattern .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ thought .
-How do I shoot ?
— When can I shoot ?
——– When must I defend myself and those I love ?
The law says you have may use lethal force when you face a certain level of threat under certain circumstances .
With time , most people who carry concealed fall back to the situation where they must shoot .
They are beautifully reluctant to harm others .
They plan to use a gun to prevent a greater harm , and to do so only when they have no other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decisions fall into place .
That is my experience , but we know far more .
Contrary to what Mayor Bloomberg implied , people with a concealed carry permit are more law abiding and less violent than the police .
That makes sense when you consider their very different situations .
Police and civilians are figuratively headed in opposite directions .
Police have to close with a criminal and make an arrest .
The ordinary citizen wants to get away from the bad guy .
I think police have a much tougher job @ @ @ @ @ @ @ criminals every day than do the police .
In fact , thousands of honest citizens defend themselves from criminal attack by using a firearm in self-defense every day .
Mayor Bloomberg chose to ignore those facts .
You know something else that Mayor Bloomberg doesn ’ t know .
You know how you live .
You know who belongs in your home and at work .
You know your neighbors , your co-workers , and your customers .
You know many of the people you meet routinely on the street .
That knowledge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go wrong .
Because of what you know and who you know , you know the good guys from the bad guys .
That helps explain why armed civilians are so much less likely than the police to shoot the wrong person .
You saw the problem unfold while the police arrive later and have to figure it out in a hurry .
Again , Mayor Bloomberg chose to ignore those facts .
Time is critical when you defend yourself from a violent attack .
When we look at the attack at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defenders had only a few seconds to respond .
( The video of the attack is here . )
We have an advantage that the police don ’ t have .
We are there when the problem unfolds .
The police arrive some 11.1 minutes later , on average .
In mass murder attacks , that delay costs about a dozen lives .
Mayor Bloomberg chose to ignore the lives we save .
Perhaps I ’ m being too hard on the Mayor .
You have knowledge and experience that the Mayor doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of us bear arms every day .
In contrast , it has been years , if not decades , since Mayor Bloomberg lived without a paid security detail .
Maybe he is telling the truth as he knows it since most of his security detail are former law enforcement officers .
In that sense , the former Mayor still lives with police protection .
The rest of us can ’ t afford that , so we do it ourselves .
Mayor Bloomberg hired New York cops to defend him , so of course @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that politicians want to give us simple answers , but the world is a complex place .
We ’ ve seen gun prohibition fail time after time .
Can we afford a political leader who gets something as simple as self-defense so consistently wrong ?
I won ’ t trust Mayor Bloomberg with the safety of my family .
~_~_ *- I noticed that Youtube has taken down the original video of Bloomberg on Fox news .
Please let me know if you can find the original source video .

I listened to Billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s remarks after the attack at the West Freeway Church of Christ in Texas. I paraphrase, but you can check the video of his remarks for yourself *
‘It is the job of law enforcement to have guns and to decide when to shoot.
You don’t want average citizens to have guns in public. That is the job of the police.’
This was a prepared speech so we have to assume Mayor Bloomberg meant what he said. One mistake is an accident, two mistakes are carelessness, and three or more falsehoods are propaganda. I had hope for Mayor Bloomberg, but, sadly, this qualifies as propaganda. To his credit, Mayor Bloomberg is probably telling us what he knows, but you know things that the Mayor doesn’t.
You know how to defend yourself and your family. I’ve taught beginners to handle firearms. My students have been properly intimidated by the moral weight of the gun. My student’s questions change with time in a consistent pattern.
They often evolve through this chain of thought.
-How do I shoot?
— When can I shoot?
——– When must I defend myself and those I love?
The law says you have may use lethal force when you face a certain level of threat under certain circumstances. With time, most people who carry concealed fall back to the situation where they must shoot. They are beautifully reluctant to harm others. They plan to use a gun to prevent a greater harm, and to do so only when they have no other choice. I’ve seen those decisions fall into place. That is my experience, but we know far more.
Contrary to what Mayor Bloomberg implied, people with a concealed carry permit are more law abiding and less violent than the police. That makes sense when you consider their very different situations. Police and civilians are figuratively headed in opposite directions. Police have to close with a criminal and make an arrest. The ordinary citizen wants to get away from the bad guy. I think police have a much tougher job, but more citizens have contact with criminals every day than do the police. In fact, thousands of honest citizens defend themselves from criminal attack by using a firearm in self-defense every day. Mayor Bloomberg chose to ignore those facts.
You know something else that Mayor Bloomberg doesn’t know. You know how you live. You know who belongs in your home and at work. You know your neighbors, your co-workers, and your customers. You know many of the people you meet routinely on the street. That knowledge gives you an incredible advantage when things go wrong. Because of what you know and who you know, you know the good guys from the bad guys. That helps explain why armed civilians are so much less likely than the police to shoot the wrong person. You saw the problem unfold while the police arrive later and have to figure it out in a hurry. Again, Mayor Bloomberg chose to ignore those facts.
Time is critical when you defend yourself from a violent attack. When we look at the attack at the West Freeway Church of Christ, the defenders had only a few seconds to respond. (The video of the attack is here.) We have an advantage that the police don’t have. We are there when the problem unfolds. The police arrive some 11.1 minutes later, on average. In mass murder attacks, that delay costs about a dozen lives. Mayor Bloomberg chose to ignore the lives we save.
Perhaps I’m being too hard on the Mayor. You have knowledge and experience that the Mayor doesn’t have. Tens of millions of us bear arms every day. In contrast, it has been years, if not decades, since Mayor Bloomberg lived without a paid security detail. Maybe he is telling the truth as he knows it since most of his security detail are former law enforcement officers. In that sense, the former Mayor still lives with police protection. The rest of us can’t afford that, so we do it ourselves.
Mayor Bloomberg hired New York cops to defend him, so of course he wants you disarmed.
I understand that politicians want to give us simple answers, but the world is a complex place. We’ve seen gun prohibition fail time after time. Can we afford a political leader who gets something as simple as self-defense so consistently wrong? I won’t trust Mayor Bloomberg with the safety of my family.
~_~_
*- I noticed that Youtube has taken down the original video of Bloomberg on Fox news. Please let me know if you can find the original source video.
Sources-
“https://www.ammoland.com/2013/10/police-officers-likely-to-murder-than-concealed-carry-permit/#axzz6BmIhY8ra
“https://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2018/04/legally-armed-people-have-murder-rate.html
“http://josephsonsexemplarypolicing.org/2016/08/average-response-time-about-ten-minutes


clashdaily--2020-01-24--DOJ Rules That At Least TWO Of The FISA Warrants Were ILLEGALLY Predicated

It is now confirmed that the latter two FISA warrants had zero legal justification to spy on Trump associates .
The January 7th ruling by Judge James Boasberg that at least two of the four FISA warrants in question had zero legal justification .
That ruling has now been formally declassified .
The FISA ruling opens up a world of legal implications for those who signed it , and for the American citizens who found themselves unlawfully surveilled by them .
Of note , this ruling only deals with the LATER two of the FISA warrants .
It is still @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two could be found inadequate .
Trending : WHOA !
Did CNN ’ s Alisyn Camerota Just Criticize Adam Schiff On The Air ?
( VIDEO ) If , in the course of investigations , the earlier two warrants are likewise found to lack legal justification that ’ s ‘ A Big Deal .
A finding like that ( which spy-gate reporting has been alleging for years ) would fully legitimize every accusation Trump has ever made about this being a ‘ witch-hunt ’ by what has been informally dubbed ‘ the deep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wide open what has been described by watchdogs , some journalists and a variety of Trump supporters as the single greatest political scandal in US history .
Something that has been called by Levin and others as a ‘ silent coup ’ — a deliberate attempt to negate the ‘ disappointing ’ ( to some ) results of a Presidential election .
Here what the DOJ ’ s had to say : “ DOJ assesses that with respect to the applications in Docket Numbers 17-375 and 17-679 , ‘ if not earlier , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cause to believe that [ Carter ] Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power , ’ ” Boasberg wrote , referring to the final two of the four FISA applications to spy on Page .
“ The Court understands the government to have concluded , in view of the material misstatements and omissions , that the Court ’ s authorizations in Docket Numbers 17-375 and 17-679 were not valid.
” Boasberg ’ s ruling noted that DOJ had not yet taken a position on the lawfulness of the first two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collecting information to assess whether those two spy applications were also invalid .
The invalid applications specified by Boasberg were dated April 7 and June 29 of 2017 .
The false and invalid April 7 application was personally signed by James Comey , while the false and invalid June 29 application was signed by Andrew McCabe .
Both men were referred for criminal prosecution by the inspector general .
Former deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein , who is alleged to have offered to wear a wire against President Donald Trump , also signed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warrant against Page .
Importantly , it is a federal crime to falsify information in such warrants , and these last two ‘ false and invalid ’ warrants were signed by James Comey and Andrew McCabe .
Not only was Carter Page the focus of these investigations , but so were anyone within two degrees of separation of contact from Carter Page , including Trump and his team .
Since the Mueller investigation was active during the final renewal of this Warrant , it is possible , if not probable , that some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Page , or to acquire information that later led to that conviction ( and perhaps others in Trump ’ s orbit ) was acquired illegally .

It is now confirmed that the latter two FISA warrants had zero legal justification to spy on Trump associates.
The January 7th ruling by Judge James Boasberg that at least two of the four FISA warrants in question had zero legal justification. That ruling has now been formally declassified.
The FISA ruling opens up a world of legal implications for those who signed it, and for the American citizens who found themselves unlawfully surveilled by them.
Of note, this ruling only deals with the LATER two of the FISA warrants. It is still possible that the predicate for the other two could be found inadequate.
If, in the course of investigations, the earlier two warrants are likewise found to lack legal justification that’s ‘A Big Deal. A finding like that (which spy-gate reporting has been alleging for years) would fully legitimize every accusation Trump has ever made about this being a ‘witch-hunt’ by what has been informally dubbed ‘the deep state’.
It would also crack wide open what has been described by watchdogs, some journalists and a variety of Trump supporters as the single greatest political scandal in US history. Something that has been called by Levin and others as a ‘silent coup’ — a deliberate attempt to negate the ‘disappointing’ (to some) results of a Presidential election.
Here what the DOJ’s had to say:
“DOJ assesses that with respect to the applications in Docket Numbers 17-375 and 17-679, ‘if not earlier, there was insufficient predication to establish probable cause to believe that [Carter] Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power,’” Boasberg wrote, referring to the final two of the four FISA applications to spy on Page. “The Court understands the government to have concluded, in view of the material misstatements and omissions, that the Court’s authorizations in Docket Numbers 17-375 and 17-679 were not valid.”
Boasberg’s ruling noted that DOJ had not yet taken a position on the lawfulness of the first two applications against Page, but was currently collecting information to assess whether those two spy applications were also invalid. The invalid applications specified by Boasberg were dated April 7 and June 29 of 2017. The false and invalid April 7 application was personally signed by James Comey, while the false and invalid June 29 application was signed by Andrew McCabe. Both men were referred for criminal prosecution by the inspector general. Former deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein, who is alleged to have offered to wear a wire against President Donald Trump, also signed off on the false June 29 FISA warrant against Page.
Importantly, it is a federal crime to falsify information in such warrants, and these last two ‘false and invalid’ warrants were signed by James Comey and Andrew McCabe.
Judge Boasberg says in a newly-declassified order that DOJ has "concluded, in view of the material misstatements and omissions, that the Court's authorizations in [two Page FISAs] were not valid." DOJ didn't take a position on whether the other two were lawful. pic.twitter.com/dynrNhLDya — Brad Heath (@bradheath) January 23, 2020
The FISC ordered the government to produce a bunch of additional information, including how it will wall off whatever info it gained from the Page wiretaps, and to explain what "related investigations" that might be going on about those FISA applications. pic.twitter.com/mzzl9SaFv8 — Brad Heath (@bradheath) January 23, 2020
This is a big deal. The Justice Department is conceding that two of the four FISA applications it used to conduct surveillance of former Trump campaign aide Carter Page were not lawful, and it's not defending the legality of its other two applications. pic.twitter.com/sa6Sg35iJB — Brad Heath (@bradheath) January 23, 2020
Not only was Carter Page the focus of these investigations, but so were anyone within two degrees of separation of contact from Carter Page, including Trump and his team.
Since the Mueller investigation was active during the final renewal of this Warrant, it is possible, if not probable, that some of the information used to convict Carter Page, or to acquire information that later led to that conviction (and perhaps others in Trump’s orbit) was acquired illegally.


clashdaily--2020-01-24--HISTORIC: Trump First-Ever Sitting President Ever To Personally Address March For Life (Video)

• ‘ They ’ re coming after me because I ’ m fighting for you ’ .
After a decades-long tradition of the March For Life rocking up to DC to have their voice — and the voices of those who can not speak for themselves — heard by their elected officials , this year was different .
The President himself stood up and mingled his own voice with that of the multitude claiming that these littlest lives are worth defending .
His attendance did not go unnoticed : That ’ s a direct shot at a ‘ conservative ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pure ’ to support Trump .
So where , exactly , was the courage of those convictions when it mattered to the lives of the unborn ?
Trump stood up and publicly acknowledged the value of the unborn , the contribution of those who fight , and the right of every child , born and unborn , to fulfill their God-given potential .
Nor is this is the President ’ s first act in defense of the lives of those not yet born .
He and Pence have participated in the prior two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ invoked the inherent value of lives yet born in his State of the Union and other public speeches .
He has backed policies in favor of the defense of that life .
Trump Admin Declares It ’ s Position On When ‘ Life Begins ’ – MANY Will Not Like This Trump ’ s Fights For Baby Charlie ’ s Life That The Pope Initially Passed On WATCH : Trump Is First POTUS To Champion Religious Freedom In Address To UN Would Jesus Have Ever Used ‘ Trumpian ’ Language ?
We ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely that question : “ Would Jesus Vote For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with a less than stellar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

‘They’re coming after me because I’m fighting for you’.
After a decades-long tradition of the March For Life rocking up to DC to have their voice — and the voices of those who cannot speak for themselves — heard by their elected officials, this year was different.
Very different.
The President himself stood up and mingled his own voice with that of the multitude claiming that these littlest lives are worth defending.
His attendance did not go unnoticed:
It’s great that Trump is speaking at the March For Life. It’s amazing that the Republican presidents before him hid in the White House and refused to come out and acknowledge the thousands of pro-lifers right outside their door. Shameful cowardice. — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) January 23, 2020
Ouch.
That’s a direct shot at a ‘conservative’ political dynasty that was too ‘morally pure’ to support Trump. So where, exactly, was the courage of those convictions when it mattered to the lives of the unborn?
Trump stood up and publicly acknowledged the value of the unborn, the contribution of those who fight, and the right of every child, born and unborn, to fulfill their God-given potential.
Nor is this is the President’s first act in defense of the lives of those not yet born.
He and Pence have participated in the prior two March For Life events.
He has invoked the inherent value of lives yet born in his State of the Union and other public speeches. He has backed policies in favor of the defense of that life.
Related…
Trump Admin Declares It’s Position On When ‘Life Begins’ – MANY Will Not Like This
Trump’s Fights For Baby Charlie’s Life That The Pope Initially Passed On
WATCH: Trump Is First POTUS To Champion Religious Freedom In Address To UN
Would Jesus Have Ever Used ‘Trumpian’ Language?
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


clashdaily--2020-01-24--WHOA! Did CNN’s Alisyn Camerota Just Criticize Adam Schiff On The Air? (VIDEO)

The Media ( D ) has been giddy and effervescent in their praise of Adam Schiff ’ s impassioned impeachment performance .
This is a stark contrast… In the last few days , the Partisan Press has been binging on Democrat Impeachment porn while the rest of the country has been ignoring the unbelievable farce that is impeachment in search of a crime .
The left and the Media ( D ) have lauded Congressman Adam Schiff ( D-CA ) ’ s lengthy arguments as eloquent , stirring , compelling , and persuasive .
But in an absolutely shocking moment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of New Day , replied to terrible satirist Joe Lockhart that she thought Rep. Schiff had made a terrible mistake in his closing statements .
She says that Rep. Schiff had misjudged the perspective of Senate Republicans and CAMEROTA : Yeah , I thought there was a misfire , actually , in Chairman Schiff ’ s final closing statement to them .
Because what he said to them was , “ You know that the President isn ’ t doing what ’ s best for the country.
” That ’ s not what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taxes , they think that rolling back regulations , they think that blocking the border is what ’ s best for the country .
And so I felt like , when he tried to say that to them , they could be like , “ Time out .
That ’ s actually not what we think .
The reason we support this president is not because we love him , and think that everything he does is perfect , it ’ s because we do think that what he ’ s doing is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Camerota accurately describe the thought process of many Republican Senators ?
I do believe she did .
Perhaps that ’ s why ( as Eddie Zipperer noted in the tweet above ) she was likely prompted to move on .
What would political discussion in the United States look like if coverage allowed for the option that Republicans aren ’ t , in fact , evil bastards with the most nefarious of intent while Democrats are as pure as the driven snow ?
Perhaps we could discuss the pros and cons of actual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ each other .
Daydreaming aside , what Camerota said is laudable — I just wish she did it more often .

The Media(D) has been giddy and effervescent in their praise of Adam Schiff’s impassioned impeachment performance. This is a stark contrast…
In the last few days, the Partisan Press has been binging on Democrat Impeachment porn while the rest of the country has been ignoring the unbelievable farce that is impeachment in search of a crime.
The left and the Media(D) have lauded Congressman Adam Schiff(D-CA)’s lengthy arguments as eloquent, stirring, compelling, and persuasive.
Donald Trump must be convicted and removed from office. Because he will always choose his own personal interest over our national interest. Because in America, right matters. Truth matters. If not, no Constitution can protect us. If not, we are lost. pic.twitter.com/USfx6v9KsT — Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) January 24, 2020
But in an absolutely shocking moment on CNN, Alisyn Camerota, host of New Day, replied to terrible satirist Joe Lockhart that she thought Rep. Schiff had made a terrible mistake in his closing statements. She says that Rep. Schiff had misjudged the perspective of Senate Republicans and
CAMEROTA: Yeah, I thought there was a misfire, actually, in Chairman Schiff’s final closing statement to them. Because what he said to them was, “You know that the President isn’t doing what’s best for the country.” That’s not what they think. They think that lower taxes, they think that rolling back regulations, they think that blocking the border is what’s best for the country. And so I felt like, when he tried to say that to them, they could be like, “Time out. That’s actually not what we think. The reason we support this president is not because we love him, and think that everything he does is perfect, it’s because we do think that what he’s doing is best for the country.”
Alisyn Camerota delivered a VERY rare criticism of Adam Schiff on CNN this morning, and I'm pretty sure a producer told her in her ear to get back to the purpose of today's show which is lobbying Lisa Murkowski. Listen to this clip and tell me that's not what happened: pic.twitter.com/1SaGwlS59f — Eddie Zipperer (@EddieZipperer) January 24, 2020
Did Alisyn Camerota accurately describe the thought process of many Republican Senators? I do believe she did. Perhaps that’s why (as Eddie Zipperer noted in the tweet above) she was likely prompted to move on.
What would political discussion in the United States look like if coverage allowed for the option that Republicans aren’t, in fact, evil bastards with the most nefarious of intent while Democrats are as pure as the driven snow?
Perhaps we could discuss the pros and cons of actual policies instead of just shouting insults at each other.
Daydreaming aside, what Camerota said is laudable — I just wish she did it more often.


clashdaily--2020-01-24--Convicted Terrorist Who Killed A U.S. Medic In Afghanistan Is A Keynote Speaker At University

Now that he ’ s been released from Gitmo , Omar Khadr , multi-millionaire , is living his best life .
Sure , he spent some time in at Gitmo , but sympathetic Canadian liberals have made sure he won ’ t suffer again .
Khadr , the former “ child soldier ” who was brought at age 15 to Afghanistan by his Al Qaeda-connected father , was held at Guantanamo Bay for eight years .
In 2002 , he was captured held at Bagram Air Base before being transferred to Gitmo a few months later .
Khadr was at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he plead guilty to killing U.S. Army Medic , Sgt .
Christopher Speer .
He later retracted .
In 2010 , Khadr was repatriated to Canada and in 2013 initiated a $ 20M ( Canadian ) lawsuit against the Government of Canada alleging that they conspired with the U.S. government to abuse his rights .
In 2017 , the Trudeau government settled the lawsuit with Khadr quietly awarding him $ 10.5M Canadian .
The awarding of multiple millions to a convicted terrorist sparked outrage in Canadian conservative circles because a Utah civil court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ family $ 134M ( USD ) for the killing of the medic .
The Speer family is still trying to have the award enforced in Canada .
Trending : WHOA !
Did CNN ’ s Alisyn Camerota Just Criticize Adam Schiff On The Air ?
( VIDEO ) Meanwhile , Khadr used $ 3 million to invest in a strip mall in Edmonton , Alberta and has hidden away the remainder .
In 2019 , a Trudeau-appointed judge ruled that his war crimes sentence had expired , so all conditions have been removed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
After his release , Khadr appeared on the french-language version of the CBC , has conducted several interviews with his version of events and enjoys mild celebrity status in Canada .
He also enrolled in university .
Now , he ’ s a keynote speaker at an event at a prestigious Canadian University in Nova Scotia .
Khadr is scheduled to speak at an event on children ’ s rights hosted by Dalhousie University on February 10 , 2020 .
The event is part of the university ’ s Open Dialogue series @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Child Soldiers Initiative .
The talk will be hosted by the CBC ’ s Nahlah Ayed and will also feature former child soldier and author Ishmael Beah as a speaker .
The question is , will Khadr be paid for this speaking appearance ?
Khadr isn ’ t honoring the Utah ruling against him and has left the Speer family to fight to get what is owed to them .
For the past few years , Khadr has been seeking a way out of US war crimes charges he pleaded guilty to before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A US civilian court has since turned down Khadr ’ s attempt to force a military court to hear an appeal on his conviction… …A Utah civil court awarded Sgt .
Speer ’ s grieving family a $ 134 million claim against Khadr for the slaying of the US soldier and the family is currently trying to have the award enforced in Canada .
“ What is important are Mr. Khadr ’ s actions that day and leading up to that day .
The plaintiffs and the Utah court hold Mr. Khadr responsible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Jamie Schacter .
I don ’ t believe in “ no platforming , ” and Khadr is free to speak anywhere that wants him there .
But it is shameful that he is given a platform at a prestigious university like Dalhousie as he continues to ignore a court ruling against him .

Now that he’s been released from Gitmo, Omar Khadr, multi-millionaire, is living his best life.
Sure, he spent some time in at Gitmo, but sympathetic Canadian liberals have made sure he won’t suffer again.
Khadr, the former “child soldier” who was brought at age 15 to Afghanistan by his Al Qaeda-connected father, was held at Guantanamo Bay for eight years. In 2002, he was captured held at Bagram Air Base before being transferred to Gitmo a few months later. Khadr was at Guantanamo Bay from 2002 to 2010 where he plead guilty to killing U.S. Army Medic, Sgt. Christopher Speer. He later retracted.
In 2010, Khadr was repatriated to Canada and in 2013 initiated a $20M (Canadian) lawsuit against the Government of Canada alleging that they conspired with the U.S. government to abuse his rights. In 2017, the Trudeau government settled the lawsuit with Khadr quietly awarding him $10.5M Canadian. The awarding of multiple millions to a convicted terrorist sparked outrage in Canadian conservative circles because a Utah civil court had awarded Sgt. Speer’s family $134M (USD) for the killing of the medic. The Speer family is still trying to have the award enforced in Canada.
Meanwhile, Khadr used $3 million to invest in a strip mall in Edmonton, Alberta and has hidden away the remainder. In 2019, a Trudeau-appointed judge ruled that his war crimes sentence had expired, so all conditions have been removed including the ban on obtaining a passport.
After his release, Khadr appeared on the french-language version of the CBC, has conducted several interviews with his version of events and enjoys mild celebrity status in Canada. He also enrolled in university.
Now, he’s a keynote speaker at an event at a prestigious Canadian University in Nova Scotia.
Khadr is scheduled to speak at an event on children’s rights hosted by Dalhousie University on February 10, 2020. The event is part of the university’s Open Dialogue series, in partnership with the Roméo Dallaire Child Soldiers Initiative. The talk will be hosted by the CBC’s Nahlah Ayed and will also feature former child soldier and author Ishmael Beah as a speaker.
The question is, will Khadr be paid for this speaking appearance?
Khadr isn’t honoring the Utah ruling against him and has left the Speer family to fight to get what is owed to them.
For the past few years, Khadr has been seeking a way out of US war crimes charges he pleaded guilty to before being released on bail in Canada. A US civilian court has since turned down Khadr’s attempt to force a military court to hear an appeal on his conviction… …A Utah civil court awarded Sgt. Speer’s grieving family a $134 million claim against Khadr for the slaying of the US soldier and the family is currently trying to have the award enforced in Canada. “What is important are Mr. Khadr’s actions that day and leading up to that day. The plaintiffs and the Utah court hold Mr. Khadr responsible,” said the Speers’ lawyer, Jamie Schacter. Source: True North
I don’t believe in “no platforming,” and Khadr is free to speak anywhere that wants him there. But it is shameful that he is given a platform at a prestigious university like Dalhousie as he continues to ignore a court ruling against him.


clashdaily--2020-01-25--Debunking The 5 Favorite Lies Of The Dems And Their Impeachment Schiff Show

Schiff is absolutely infatuated with the sound of his own voice .
He ’ s one of the many Democrats that are desperate to have the rest of us believe his narrative .
Because if we do NOT believe their lies , how can anyone possibly accept the evidence against Trump ?
And if they can ’ t kneecap Trump by smearing him , what *possible* chance do they have against the crowds he can draw ?
Let ’ s have a look at some of their favorite lies to fling Trump ’ s way , and why they fall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Killed A U.S. Medic In Afghanistan Is A Keynote Speaker At University Trump , they claim , is a massive power-mad monster that threatens the very American Democratic process itself .
Oh really ?
Remind us .
Did he at ANY point block or interfere with the Mueller Report ’ s actions ?
Did he give access to people and information in which he would have been perfectly within his right to invoke ‘ executive privilege ’ ?
When lower courts blocked him from exercising his lawful Article II responsibilities , did he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the decisions in a higher court ?
What about Executive powers ?
Has he been running amok with his ‘ pen and his phone ’ ?
If anything he ’ s pissed off Chuck and Nancy for telling them that CONGRESS makes laws , and it ’ s not up to him to make them .
Schiff is STILL peddling the busted lie about Trump being Putin ’ s puppet .
Mueller spent TENS of millions of taxpayer dollars turning over every stone trying ( desperately ) to prove his guilt .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stated it expressly : “ Indeed , Rosenstein stated that there is “ no allegation in this indictment that any American had any knowledge ” of the Russian effort .
— The Hill ” What ’ s the matter , Schiff ?
The same guy who so loudly chides Trump for not listening to the political advice of his foreign advisors seems to be having a hard time with the findings of a Special Counsel that produced a result contrary for the one he so desperately craved .
Don ’ t you believe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If so , why are you still droning on about Russia ?
If not , how DARE you criticize Trump for challenging his own advisors .
This gets a heavy dose of the ‘ Russia ’ treatement , too .
But only to explain away where the story came from in the first place .
One of Schiff ’ s own hand-picked Witnesses in the House Impeachment testimony — the ‘ martyred ’ Ambassador — testified that in her own preparation for her appointment as Ambassador , Obama ’ s team included conflicts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Ukraine employment as a prep question .
Officials in Obama administration raised objections to the conflict of interest , but nothing came of it .
So far as the actual story itself , journalists digging into the story have been personally attacked and their reputation impugned — even when they produce original source documents that raise more questions than answers .
White House meetings where Obama officials raised the issues of Burisma and Hunter by name came up .
News stories about no less than FIVE family members of Biden having their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the activities of the White House have been reported .
And it REALLY looks like we ’ re only seeing the tip of the iceberg .
But Schiff assures us that Biden is an ‘ honorable ’ man .
To use another of his phrases , if Biden really IS innocent , he has nothing to hide .
Trump has never once taken the stand .
He has not said a single word about what motivated his various ‘ objectionable ’ behavior .
Yet , somehow , the Democrats can tell you EXACTLY @ @ @ @ @ @ @ motivations of his heart in each of his decisions .
When he was on that phone with the Ukranian President , Schiff can tell you EXACTLY what Trump was thinking .
And when Trump played hardball with the Congressional subpoena demands , they were privy to his inner monologue .
Sure they were .
That ’ s why they can say ‘ conclusively ’ that Trump ’ s phone call was motivated by a desire to destroy an enemy , and not ( since Mueller had JUST concluded ) to get to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from 2016 which we now know conclusively included players in Ukraine .
It assumes it has NOTHING to do with a video in which Biden boasted about — allow the irony to really sink in — threatening to withhold a billion dollars in aid to Ukraine unless a Ukrainian official had been fired by midnight .
And Joe Biden boasted ‘ son of a bitch , he got fired ’ .
What about his telling Congress to go pound sand ?
We ’ ve already shown his cooperation with Mueller and Court rulings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Plenty .
The President ’ s own rights as the accused were being systematically trampled in Congress .
Trump was NOT permitted to call any witnesses of his own .
He was NOT permitted to cross-examine , he was NOT even allowed to have White House counsel present .
Is that important or relevant ?
Of course it is .
Remember how Schiff so jealously guarded the secrecy of information on the Whistleblower , and forbade witnesses to answer certain categories of questions ?
He was protecting ‘ privileged information ’ .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ present , who will tell Schiff — the witness can not answer this question ?
Who would tell Schiff , ‘ You are exceeding the boundaries of the separation of powers.
’ Does anyone really believe he would NOT try to have questions answered whether they were privileged or not ?
Doesn ’ t Schiff know that a Judge would have ordered that WH counsel must be present if any Executive branch witness should be called ?
Lie # 5 ) Trump claimed that Article II gives him the right to do ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this to buttress their claim that he ’ s a despot .
But is that what he really said ?
He can do ‘ anything ’ ?
Really ?
Do they think he means he can launch wars without Congressional approval ?
Write executive orders that supersede immigration law ?
Spy on political rivals ?
Weaponize the IRS to help him win reelection ?
No , Trump didn ’ t do any of those things .
Does CONTEXT matter ?
It took awhile to dig it up , but that quote they love @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 23 , 2019 speech to TPUSA .
There ’ s never been a better time .
Because our future is the brightest that it ’ s ever been .
A new poll only — you got to hear this .
How about this whole witch hunt that ’ s going on ?
Should I talk about it for a second ?
[ Audience calls Yeah ] First of all , it ’ s very bad for our country .
Makes it very hard to deal with Russia .
And we should be able @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They have a big country .
And we should be able to deal with them without having this artificial stuff .
But think of it : Only 11 percent , in a new poll , favor the starting of this ridiculous impeachment hearings that are going on .
You hear about it .
So I said this morning — I said — I wrote it out .
I said , “ Let ’ s see… ” — because I ’ m watching .
It goes on for years and years .
No @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , that ’ s not good enough .
Let ’ s go more.
” Forty million dollars , interview 500 people — they got nothing .
I could find something — I could take anybody in this audience .
Give me $ 40 million .
Give me unlimited FBI , unlimited interviews , unlimited — they interviewed 500 people .
Listen to this : Two thousand five hundred subpoenas .
They did everything .
Their collusion ; no collusion .
They have no collusion .
Then I have an Article 2 , where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I want as President .
But I don ’ t even talk about that because they did a report and there was no obstruction .
After looking at it , our great Attorney General read it .
He ’ s a total professional .
He said , “ There ’ s nothing here .
There ’ s no obstruction.
” So they referenced , “ No obstruction.
” So you have no collusion , no obstruction , and yet it goes on .
And they think this is helping them .
Source : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what Article II permits him to do , relating to what Democrats tried to claim was obstruction .
Trump was free to fire Comey as an Article II perogative .
He was even free to fire Mueller as an Article II perogative .
He did not exercise that perogatie , but it was his to use or not .
THAT is his point , taken in context .
If the Democrats have to lie to make their case , they are desperate .
And if they are desperate ?
That ’ s a @ @ @

Schiff is absolutely infatuated with the sound of his own voice. He’s one of the many Democrats that are desperate to have the rest of us believe his narrative.
Because if we do NOT believe their lies, how can anyone possibly accept the evidence against Trump? And if they can’t kneecap Trump by smearing him, what *possible* chance do they have against the crowds he can draw?
Let’s have a look at some of their favorite lies to fling Trump’s way, and why they fall flat.
Lie #1) Trump is a Dictator, a Monarch, etc…
Trump, they claim, is a massive power-mad monster that threatens the very American Democratic process itself.
Oh really? Remind us. Did he at ANY point block or interfere with the Mueller Report’s actions? Did he give access to people and information in which he would have been perfectly within his right to invoke ‘executive privilege’? When lower courts blocked him from exercising his lawful Article II responsibilities, did he ignore them, or did he fight the decisions in a higher court? What about Executive powers? Has he been running amok with his ‘pen and his phone’? If anything he’s pissed off Chuck and Nancy for telling them that CONGRESS makes laws, and it’s not up to him to make them.
Lie #2) Russia, Russia, Russia
Schiff is STILL peddling the busted lie about Trump being Putin’s puppet. Mueller spent TENS of millions of taxpayer dollars turning over every stone trying (desperately) to prove his guilt. The came up empty. The Mueller Report stated it expressly: “Indeed, Rosenstein stated that there is “no allegation in this indictment that any American had any knowledge” of the Russian effort. — The Hill”
What’s the matter, Schiff? The same guy who so loudly chides Trump for not listening to the political advice of his foreign advisors seems to be having a hard time with the findings of a Special Counsel that produced a result contrary for the one he so desperately craved. Don’t you believe the findings of the Special Counsel? If so, why are you still droning on about Russia? If not, how DARE you criticize Trump for challenging his own advisors.
Pick a lane, genius.
Lie #3) Biden Corruption Story is ‘debunked’ and off-limits
This gets a heavy dose of the ‘Russia’ treatement, too. But only to explain away where the story came from in the first place.
One of Schiff’s own hand-picked Witnesses in the House Impeachment testimony — the ‘martyred’ Ambassador — testified that in her own preparation for her appointment as Ambassador, Obama’s team included conflicts of interest centered on Hunter Biden’s Ukraine employment as a prep question. Officials in Obama administration raised objections to the conflict of interest, but nothing came of it.
So far as the actual story itself, journalists digging into the story have been personally attacked and their reputation impugned — even when they produce original source documents that raise more questions than answers.
White House meetings where Obama officials raised the issues of Burisma and Hunter by name came up. News stories about no less than FIVE family members of Biden having their financial futures and fortunes inexplicably tied to the activities of the White House have been reported.
And it REALLY looks like we’re only seeing the tip of the iceberg.
But Schiff assures us that Biden is an ‘honorable’ man.
To use another of his phrases, if Biden really IS innocent, he has nothing to hide.
Lie #4) Trump’s motives and intent
Trump has never once taken the stand. He has not said a single word about what motivated his various ‘objectionable’ behavior. Yet, somehow, the Democrats can tell you EXACTLY what he was thinking in the private motivations of his heart in each of his decisions.
When he was on that phone with the Ukranian President, Schiff can tell you EXACTLY what Trump was thinking. And when Trump played hardball with the Congressional subpoena demands, they were privy to his inner monologue.
Sure they were.
That’s why they can say ‘conclusively’ that Trump’s phone call was motivated by a desire to destroy an enemy, and not (since Mueller had JUST concluded) to get to the bottom of the obvious conspiracy against him from 2016 which we now know conclusively included players in Ukraine. It assumes it has NOTHING to do with a video in which Biden boasted about — allow the irony to really sink in — threatening to withhold a billion dollars in aid to Ukraine unless a Ukrainian official had been fired by midnight. And Joe Biden boasted ‘son of a bitch, he got fired’.
What about his telling Congress to go pound sand? We’ve already shown his cooperation with Mueller and Court rulings. What made THIS demand any different?
Plenty. The President’s own rights as the accused were being systematically trampled in Congress.
Trump was NOT permitted to call any witnesses of his own. He was NOT permitted to cross-examine, he was NOT even allowed to have White House counsel present.
Is that important or relevant?
Of course it is.
Remember how Schiff so jealously guarded the secrecy of information on the Whistleblower, and forbade witnesses to answer certain categories of questions? He was protecting ‘privileged information’. If there is no White House lawyer present, who will tell Schiff — the witness cannot answer this question? Who would tell Schiff, ‘You are exceeding the boundaries of the separation of powers.’ Does anyone really believe he would NOT try to have questions answered whether they were privileged or not?
Doesn’t Schiff know that a Judge would have ordered that WH counsel must be present if any Executive branch witness should be called?
Lie #5) Trump claimed that Article II gives him the right to do ‘whatever he wants’.
They use this to buttress their claim that he’s a despot. But is that what he really said?
He can do ‘anything’? Really?
Do they think he means he can launch wars without Congressional approval? Write executive orders that supersede immigration law? Spy on political rivals? Weaponize the IRS to help him win reelection? No, Trump didn’t do any of those things.
Does CONTEXT matter? It took awhile to dig it up, but that quote they love to trot out came from his July 23, 2019 speech to TPUSA.
Here’s the context there:
There’s never been a better time. Because our future is the brightest that it’s ever been. A new poll only — you got to hear this. How about this whole witch hunt that’s going on? Should I talk about it for a second? [Audience calls Yeah] The Russian witch hunt, okay? [Audience Boos] First of all, it’s very bad for our country. Makes it very hard to deal with Russia. And we should be able — they’re a nuclear power. They have a big country. And we should be able to deal with them without having this artificial stuff. But think of it: Only 11 percent, in a new poll, favor the starting of this ridiculous impeachment hearings that are going on. You hear about it. So I said this morning — I said — I wrote it out. I said, “Let’s see…” — because I’m watching. It goes on for years and years. No collusion, no obstruction. “Oh, that’s not good enough. Let’s go more.” Forty million dollars, interview 500 people — they got nothing. I could find something — I could take anybody in this audience. Give me $40 million. Give me unlimited FBI, unlimited interviews, unlimited — they interviewed 500 people. Listen to this: Two thousand five hundred subpoenas. They did everything. Their collusion; no collusion. They have no collusion. Then I have an Article 2, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President. But I don’t even talk about that because they did a report and there was no obstruction. After looking at it, our great Attorney General read it. He’s a total professional. He said, “There’s nothing here. There’s no obstruction.” So they referenced, “No obstruction.” So you have no collusion, no obstruction, and yet it goes on. And they think this is helping them.
Source: Transcript
He’s obviously talking about what Article II permits him to do, relating to what Democrats tried to claim was obstruction.
Trump was free to fire Comey as an Article II prerogative.
He was even free to fire Mueller as an Article II prerogative.
He did not exercise that prerogative, but it was his to use or not. THAT is his point, taken in context.
If the Democrats have to lie to make their case, they are desperate.
And if they are desperate? That’s a good sign.


clashdaily--2020-01-25--WATCH: Puerto Ricans Bring A Guillotine To Protest Local Leaders At Capital Building

How are Puerto Ricans taking the news about corruption and ineptitude standing between their citizens and the Aid America had delivered ?
And the news that they deliberately HID that fact from them ?
Well , they have delivered their leaders a VERY ‘ sharp ’ message .
They brought a life-sized Guillotine to their protest .
Imagine looking out of the Governor ’ s mansion to see THIS outside your window : They may never see the phrase ‘ heads will roll ’ in the same light again .
The protesters don ’ t seem to be buying the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AOC like to kick around about everything being somehow a problem of ‘ colonialism ’ .
No , that lets people who were elected to areas of specific responsibility off the hook too easily .
They were elected to do a job .
If someone from the US mainland failed this miserably , we ’ d be calling for his head .
Puerto Rican officials should be held to the VERY same standard .
To be quite honest , that sends a FAR stronger message than just burning paper mache people in effigy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and taking it to a protest takes commitment .

How are Puerto Ricans taking the news about corruption and ineptitude standing between their citizens and the Aid America had delivered? And the news that they deliberately HID that fact from them?
Well, they have delivered their leaders a VERY ‘sharp’ message.
They brought a life-sized Guillotine to their protest.
Imagine looking out of the Governor’s mansion to see THIS outside your window:
A Puerto Rican guillotine of the resistance flag. Worth noting, Puerto Rico has one of the highest indices of income inequality in the world. Protester tells me that they want to move up elections now to remove the current government. “We gave them a chance, and they struck out.” pic.twitter.com/f4ca0OBoG2 — Arelis R. Hernández (@arelisrhdz) January 23, 2020
They may never see the phrase ‘heads will roll’ in the same light again. The protesters don’t seem to be buying the passing of the buck that folks like AOC like to kick around about everything being somehow a problem of ‘colonialism’.
No, that lets people who were elected to areas of specific responsibility off the hook too easily. They were elected to do a job. If someone from the US mainland failed this miserably, we’d be calling for his head. Puerto Rican officials should be held to the VERY same standard.
Jail time or mass resignations.
Y’all. Puerto Rico is back. This protest right now is not just demanding the governor resign. They’re calling for mass resignations or jail time. pic.twitter.com/XbE78zmxE7 — Joshua Potash (@JoshuaPotash) January 23, 2020
The guillotine has been been put up outside the Governor’s mansion in San Juan. pic.twitter.com/siTCpihlRO — Joshua Potash (@JoshuaPotash) January 23, 2020
This was the moment, a short time ago, that police used tear gas to disperse protesters in front of the Puerto Rico Governor's mansion. They are demanding the resignation of Governor @wandavazquezg and Senate President Thomas Rivera Schatz. pic.twitter.com/X3DK2TRVEz — David Begnaud (@DavidBegnaud) January 24, 2020
To be quite honest, that sends a FAR stronger message than just burning paper mache people in effigy.
Building a freaking guillotine like that, and taking it to a protest takes commitment.


clashdaily--2020-01-25--Impeachment Defense: Team Counters Schiff’s Emotions With A Barrage of Facts (Video)

Democrats avoided mentioning the very inconvenient facts that would blow their case apart .
These measured and steady recounting of facts stood in stark contrast to the melodrama of the prosecution .
By comparison to the long and droning testimony from the Prosecution of the House managers , the defense was short and sweet , not even requiring the full time allotted today .
There are six main points that the defence team wants Senators — and the rest of us — to come away with , which they listed as : Trending : Convicted Terrorist Who Killed A U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ At University As we go through these details , keep in mind that none of these exculpatory points were referenced or even acknowledged by the Democrats .
In many cases they were deliberately skipped over .
Note : The facts that we are examining today are the Democrats ’ facts — facts that were entirely pre-cleared in a basement bunker –facts that were left out in the 21 hours of testimony .
They shared only a SELECTIVE portion of the record .
And they have a very heavy burden of proof .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as they would have us believe .
Even before Nancy Pelosi knew the content of the phone call , she announced they would be proceeding with Impeachment .
Ultimately , there are two key reasons that Trump would typically hold back aid to any foreign nation .
We have seen him hold back aid in other places .
Burden-sharing or concerns about corruption .
The phone call in question specifically references BOTH of these concerns .
When Trump mentioned Germany , that was a reference to the financial burden-sharing of Ukraine ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about such burdens resting disproportionally upon the shoulders of US taxpayers when other powers can share that burden .
Trump has TWO Issues that go to the core of sending foreign aid overseas .
Corruption in Ukraine is a known issue , and dealing with BOTH issues are entirely in line with US national and security interests .
Here are a few key snapshots from arguments raised in his defense : — Military defense ( Javelin anti-tank missiles ) and the foreign aid that had been suspended are NOT connected .
In the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the anti-tank missiles , and intends to buy more .
These are NOT part of the paused security assistance .
These are different programs entirely , even Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch and Tim Morrison testified to the fact that these were unrelated .
House managers , at no time mentioned that these Javalin statements were unrelated .
‘ Do US a favor ’ was not connected to the javelin sales , and even if it were it could not therefore be connected to the paused security assistance .
Even more to the point , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me ) but a diplomatic favor nation-to-nation ( US ) .
— Perfect call ?
However much bureaucrats dislike this fact , elected officials MAKE foreign policy and staff merely advise and enact it .
Lt General Kellogg “ I heard nothing wrong or improper on the call .
I had and have no concerns ” — Nov 19 , 2019 Witnesses .
One witness ‘ troubled ’ by the call was silent for 2 months and did not raise those concerns until AFTER Pelosi launched her inquiry .
And Timothy Morrison was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not the call itself , which he testified as not ‘ doing anything improper ’ .
Meanwhile , Ukraine officials thought the ‘ call went fine , the call went well ’ .
And even Zelensky himself claimed ‘ nobody pushed me ’ .
A Time Magazine story corroborates that view in interviews they had with Ukraine officials in early December .
— Mind Reading : Schiff ’ s team claims to know what is ‘ really ’ on the mind of the parties involved .
Their theory requires publicly calling Zalensky a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the national stage .
— No ‘ quo ’ in the quid pro quo .
Within hours of the Politico article reporting about the hold , they contacted the US about the hold .
Which would indicate that this is when they really found out about it .
This contradicts the House managers ’ claim .
Absolutely FATAL to the case is the Ukrainians ’ lack of knowledge of the hold .
Never once did Democrats raise the problem that Ambassador Sondland mentioned his views were assumptions , presumptions and speculations .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quid pro quo .
Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.
” MUELLER Report — ‘ This for That ’ Mueller report exonerated the President from allegations of Russian collusion , despite Schiff persisting with that allegation .
FISA court ruling about problems .
President had reason to question the info he was provided Referenced the letter by 3 senators demanding Ukraine cooperate with Mueller Report which some read as implying a connection with the withholding of future aid .
— Did Trump Defy Congress with just cause ?
Dems claim ‘ Blanket @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s objections are not generally rooted in the law and are not legal arguments ’ .
Except that is not true .
eg : October 18 letter : ‘ Although the Committee ’ s subpoena transmittal letter states that the subpoena has issued ” [ p ] ursuant to the House of Representatives ’ impeachment inquiry , “ The House has not authorized your committees to conduct any such inquiry or to subpoena information in furtherance of it ” The subpoenas were invalid requests because they had not been authorized by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was an Oct 8 letter sent to Pelosi — if committees wish to return to regular order… we stand ready… and respect the separation of powers… ’ [ They never did return to ‘ regular order ’ . ]
The complaint that Trump ‘ Never asserted executive privilege ’ is true but misleading .
The rationale did not depend on that assertion of exec privilege .
They were undergirded by a different legal rationale Three examples : the subpoenas were not authorized to be given by a proper House vote ; or they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are immune to Congressional demands due to Separation of powers ; OR , they were instructed to testify without the presence of White House legal counsel .
Does the House vote matter ?
Absolutely .
One of several quotes to that effect : Feb 6 , 1974 — Such a resolution has ALWAYS been passed by the House… It is a necessary step if we are to meet our obligations Rep. Rodino , Chairman of House Judiciary Committee ( speaking of a vote assigning the power to investigate impeachment ) Even Nixon , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vote .
Before that , only publicly-available records were examined .
‘ Committee must be authorized by the full House.
’ Due process to President was denied in first 2 rounds of hearings , but the third round , Dems claim , he had opportunity .
But did he , really ?
This ‘ third round ’ was the Dec 4th Hearing scheduled with only some law professors , ( the President was not told which ones ) .
The President declined to attend this day of hearings ( he was meeting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ write Nadler a letter after he asked what rights he would want to exercise .
President ’ s counsel wanted some more information so they could properly answer that question .
They wanted to know : -would fact witnesses be called , including ones named by Nunes -would judiciary committee and President be allowed to cross-examine fact witnesses -would republicans ( effectively , the Defense ) be authorized to call any witnesses of their OWN choosing NADLER did not respond to that letter .
And Pelosi concluded the process on the morning of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intention of hearing from any other witnesses .
For 71 of those 78 days , the president was locked out .
And no reply was given him concerning the rights he wished to exercise as the accused .
Cross-examination is the ‘ greatest legal engine for the discovery of truth ’ .
And he was not given any opportunity to provide any .
That ’ s NOT what due process looks like .
Worse yet , potentially exculpatory Testimony about political motives of the Whistleblower that was discussed by the official to whom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the SCIFF .
What we DO know is that the whistleblower has been described as politically motivated , and some publicly-available reports connect him t Biden .
All of this , and there was still an hour to spare that they left unused .

Democrats avoided mentioning the very inconvenient facts that would blow their case apart. These measured and steady recounting of facts stood in stark contrast to the melodrama of the prosecution.
By comparison to the long and droning testimony from the Prosecution of the House managers, the defense was short and sweet, not even requiring the full time allotted today.
There are six main points that the defence team wants Senators — and the rest of us — to come away with, which they listed as:
6 Key Facts:
1) Transcript shows no link between investigations and security assistance or a presidential meeting
2) Ukrainians Repeatedly have said there was no quid pro quo and they felt no pressure
3) Ukraine did not know security assistance was paused until more than a month after the call
4) NONE of the Democrats’ witnesses say President Trump inked investigations to security assistance or a meeting
5) Ukraine announced no investigations and still received security assistance and a presidential meeting
6) President Trump Strengthened US support for Ukraine
As we go through these details, keep in mind that none of these exculpatory points were referenced or even acknowledged by the Democrats. In many cases they were deliberately skipped over.
Note: The facts that we are examining today are the Democrats’ facts — facts that were entirely pre-cleared in a basement bunker –facts that were left out in the 21 hours of testimony. They shared only a SELECTIVE portion of the record. And they have a very heavy burden of proof.
And even THOSE facts are not as conclusive as they would have us believe. Even before Nancy Pelosi knew the content of the phone call, she announced they would be proceeding with Impeachment.
Ultimately, there are two key reasons that Trump would typically hold back aid to any foreign nation. We have seen him hold back aid in other places. Burden-sharing or concerns about corruption.
The phone call in question specifically references BOTH of these concerns.
When Trump mentioned Germany, that was a reference to the financial burden-sharing of Ukraine’s security. Trump has been very vocal about such burdens resting disproportionally upon the shoulders of US taxpayers when other powers can share that burden.
Trump has TWO Issues that go to the core of sending foreign aid overseas.
1) Burden Sharing and 2) corruption
Corruption in Ukraine is a known issue, and dealing with BOTH issues are entirely in line with US national and security interests.
Here are a few key snapshots from arguments raised in his defense:
— Military defense (Javelin anti-tank missiles) and the foreign aid that had been suspended are NOT connected.
In the phone call, Zelenskyy thanks Trump for the anti-tank missiles, and intends to buy more. These are NOT part of the paused security assistance. These are different programs entirely, even Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch and Tim Morrison testified to the fact that these were unrelated.
House managers, at no time mentioned that these Javalin statements were unrelated.
‘Do US a favor’ was not connected to the javelin sales, and even if it were it could not therefore be connected to the paused security assistance. Even more to the point, it was not a personal favor (me) but a diplomatic favor nation-to-nation (US).
— Perfect call? However much bureaucrats dislike this fact, elected officials MAKE foreign policy and staff merely advise and enact it.
Lt General Kellogg “I heard nothing wrong or improper on the call. I had and have no concerns” — Nov 19, 2019
Witnesses. One witness ‘troubled’ by the call was silent for 2 months and did not raise those concerns until AFTER Pelosi launched her inquiry. And Timothy Morrison was concerned about ‘leaks’, but not the call itself, which he testified as not ‘doing anything improper’.
Meanwhile, Ukraine officials thought the ‘call went fine, the call went well’. And even Zelensky himself claimed ‘nobody pushed me’. A Time Magazine story corroborates that view in interviews they had with Ukraine officials in early December.
— Mind Reading: Schiff’s team claims to know what is ‘really’ on the mind of the parties involved.
Their theory requires publicly calling Zalensky a liar, which itself undercuts Ukraine in the national stage.
— No ‘quo’ in the quid pro quo.
Within hours of the Politico article reporting about the hold, they contacted the US about the hold. Which would indicate that this is when they really found out about it. This contradicts the House managers’ claim.
Absolutely FATAL to the case is the Ukrainians’ lack of knowledge of the hold.
Never once did Democrats raise the problem that Ambassador Sondland mentioned his views were assumptions, presumptions and speculations. “I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.”
—Why would Trump possibly doubt his advisors?
MUELLER Report — ‘This for That’ Mueller report exonerated the President from allegations of Russian collusion, despite Schiff persisting with that allegation.
FISA court ruling about problems. President had reason to question the info he was provided
— Senators making similar requests of Ukraine
Referenced the letter by 3 senators demanding Ukraine cooperate with Mueller Report which some read as implying a connection with the withholding of future aid.
— Did Trump Defy Congress with just cause?
Dems claim ‘Blanket defiance’, and that ‘Trump’s objections are not generally rooted in the law and are not legal arguments’. Except that is not true.
eg: October 18 letter: ‘Although the Committee’s subpoena transmittal letter states that the subpoena has issued” [p]ursuant to the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry, “The House has not authorized your committees to conduct any such inquiry or to subpoena information in furtherance of it”
The subpoenas were invalid requests because they had not been authorized by the House to wield such authority.
Dems claim: Blanket refusal and ‘no negotiation’. But…
There was an Oct 8 letter sent to Pelosi — if committees wish to return to regular order… we stand ready… and respect the separation of powers…’
[They never did return to ‘regular order’.]
The complaint that Trump ‘Never asserted executive privilege’ is true but misleading. The rationale did not depend on that assertion of exec privilege. They were undergirded by a different legal rationale
Three examples: the subpoenas were not authorized to be given by a proper House vote; or they were issued to senior Presidential advisors who are immune to Congressional demands due to Separation of powers; OR, they were instructed to testify without the presence of White House legal counsel.
Does the House vote matter? Absolutely. One of several quotes to that effect:
Feb 6, 1974 — Such a resolution has ALWAYS been passed by the House… It is a necessary step if we are to meet our obligations Rep. Rodino, Chairman of House Judiciary Committee (speaking of a vote assigning the power to investigate impeachment)
Even Nixon, there were no subpoenas given until AFTER the vote. Before that, only publicly-available records were examined.
‘Committee must be authorized by the full House.’
— Was Trump given Due Process?
Due process to President was denied in first 2 rounds of hearings, but the third round, Dems claim, he had opportunity. But did he, really?
This ‘third round’ was the Dec 4th Hearing scheduled with only some law professors, (the President was not told which ones). The President declined to attend this day of hearings (he was meeting with NATO). But they did write Nadler a letter after he asked what rights he would want to exercise. President’s counsel wanted some more information so they could properly answer that question. They wanted to know:
-would fact witnesses be called, including ones named by Nunes
-would judiciary committee and President be allowed to cross-examine fact witnesses
-would republicans (effectively, the Defense) be authorized to call any witnesses of their OWN choosing
NADLER did not respond to that letter. And Pelosi concluded the process on the morning of Dec 5th. The committee had ZERO intention of hearing from any other witnesses. For 71 of those 78 days, the president was locked out. And no reply was given him concerning the rights he wished to exercise as the accused.
Cross-examination is the ‘greatest legal engine for the discovery of truth’. And he was not given any opportunity to provide any.
That’s NOT what due process looks like.
Worse yet, potentially exculpatory Testimony about political motives of the Whistleblower that was discussed by the official to whom the Whistleblower reported are still sequestered in the SCIFF. What we DO know is that the whistleblower has been described as politically motivated, and some publicly-available reports connect him t Biden.
All of this, and there was still an hour to spare that they left unused.


clashdaily--2020-01-25--How Time Spent With Horses Can Be Good For Your Mental Health

Fern Ridge Counseling is certified in Equine Assisted Psychotherapy and Equine Assisted Learning offering equine assisted mental health interventions in support of the success of this evidenced based practice .
Both professionally and personally , horses have phenomenal psychological benefits and can be excellent for self-care practices .
Equine Assisted Psychotherapy is a new innovative modality for mental health treatment .
It is an evidence based practice that incorporates horses into the therapeutic process .
We already know that animals have manifested into extraordinary emotional support animals for companionship and therapeutic benefits .
Animals can assist in alleviating emotional distress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Studies have shown that interacting with animals helps decrease stress hormones in the body , thus improving your mood .
Equine Assisted Psychotherapy ( EAP ) and Equine Assisted Learning ( EAL ) can be effective for all ages and an assortment of life ’ s challenges .
EAP exercises can address different therapeutic concerns such as trauma and PTSD .
Additionally , equine therapy can improve anxiety , depression , boundary issues , self-esteem , confidence , help rebuild trust , bonding , empathy , improve social skills , problem solving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an opportunity for the therapist and the client to experience real life challenges , frustrations , and emotions as they arise in real time settings .
Horses are excellent for mirroring emotions , an excellent use of symbolism and metaphors , and many other benefits .
Horses provide immediate feedback , requires vulnerability from the client , and provides an opportunity for the client to experience personal revelation .
Using equine therapy for mental health benefits is more than just petting or mounting the horse .
There are exercises to assist in self @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the horse , thus improving intricacies such as low self-esteem .
Some exercises include catching and haltering a horse , picking a horse from the herd and identifying how the clients emotions are observable in the horse ’ s behavior .
Focusing on the horses behavior can generate insight to your own thoughts and emotions and encourage relaxation practices in real time .
Some studies suggest individuals who struggle with anxiety and social skills gain a tremendous amount of growth due to the horse ’ s mirroring and feedback .
This helps create @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opportunity to put interventions into practice .
EAP is also helpful for individuals who struggle with trauma and PTSD .
People who experience any type of trauma can have difficulty establishing trust and being vulnerable .
Both of these emotions are essential to the therapeutic practice with horses , yet a safe environment for such exploration .
Horses are non-judgemental , unbiased , and forgiving animals .
Horses do not know your past , your mistakes , your shame , and do not care about your appearance .
Horses care about your personal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feel as you engage with them .
Because of the horses behavioral response to your emotions , this intervention has the potential of improving mindfulness and personal awareness .
Trending : Convicted Terrorist Who Killed A U.S. Medic In Afghanistan Is A Keynote Speaker At University Horses can provoke emotions in you , such as anxiety , self-doubt , and uncertainty , however , what better way than to work with the therapist as you experience these emotions .
Avoidance of experiences cause these emotions to get worse , therefore , exposure to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ great step toward working through them .
With the emotional support of the horse and your therapist , you can take back your control and improve the quality of your life .
Take psychotherapy and counseling out of the office and into the arena and the great outdoors .
Start achieving personal growth through equine assisted psychotherapy with horses and engage all of your senses .
EAP is covered by some insurances and generally requires a prior authorization .
If your insurance does not cover EAP or if you do not have insurance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a sliding scale option .
There is something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man – Winston Churchill

Fern Ridge Counseling is certified in Equine Assisted Psychotherapy and Equine Assisted Learning offering equine assisted mental health interventions in support of the success of this evidenced based practice. Both professionally and personally, horses have phenomenal psychological benefits and can be excellent for self-care practices. Equine Assisted Psychotherapy is a new innovative modality for mental health treatment. It is an evidence based practice that incorporates horses into the therapeutic process. We already know that animals have manifested into extraordinary emotional support animals for companionship and therapeutic benefits. Animals can assist in alleviating emotional distress and also serve individuals with physical disability. Studies have shown that interacting with animals helps decrease stress hormones in the body, thus improving your mood.
Equine Assisted Psychotherapy (EAP) and Equine Assisted Learning (EAL) can be effective for all ages and an assortment of life’s challenges. EAP exercises can address different therapeutic concerns such as trauma and PTSD. Additionally, equine therapy can improve anxiety, depression, boundary issues, self-esteem, confidence, help rebuild trust, bonding, empathy, improve social skills, problem solving and much more. This modality provides an opportunity for the therapist and the client to experience real life challenges, frustrations, and emotions as they arise in real time settings. Horses are excellent for mirroring emotions, an excellent use of symbolism and metaphors, and many other benefits. Horses provide immediate feedback, requires vulnerability from the client, and provides an opportunity for the client to experience personal revelation.
Using equine therapy for mental health benefits is more than just petting or mounting the horse. There are exercises to assist in self discovery and opportunity to experience victories with the horse, thus improving intricacies such as low self-esteem. Some exercises include catching and haltering a horse, picking a horse from the herd and identifying how the clients emotions are observable in the horse’s behavior. Focusing on the horses behavior can generate insight to your own thoughts and emotions and encourage relaxation practices in real time. Some studies suggest individuals who struggle with anxiety and social skills gain a tremendous amount of growth due to the horse’s mirroring and feedback. This helps create a sense of personal awareness and an opportunity to put interventions into practice.
EAP is also helpful for individuals who struggle with trauma and PTSD. People who experience any type of trauma can have difficulty establishing trust and being vulnerable. Both of these emotions are essential to the therapeutic practice with horses, yet a safe environment for such exploration. Horses are non-judgemental, unbiased, and forgiving animals. Horses do not know your past, your mistakes, your shame, and do not care about your appearance. Horses care about your personal behavior and the emotional energy that they feel as you engage with them. Because of the horses behavioral response to your emotions, this intervention has the potential of improving mindfulness and personal awareness.
Horses can provoke emotions in you, such as anxiety, self-doubt, and uncertainty, however, what better way than to work with the therapist as you experience these emotions. Avoidance of experiences cause these emotions to get worse, therefore, exposure to something that encourages these emotions is a great step toward working through them. With the emotional support of the horse and your therapist, you can take back your control and improve the quality of your life.
Take psychotherapy and counseling out of the office and into the arena and the great outdoors. Start achieving personal growth through equine assisted psychotherapy with horses and engage all of your senses.
EAP is covered by some insurances and generally requires a prior authorization. If your insurance does not cover EAP or if you do not have insurance, ask your mental health facility about a sliding scale option.
There is something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man – Winston Churchill


clashdaily--2020-01-26--Ancient Biblical Wisdom Vs. The Latest Chinese Disease Scare

Skeptics love to snicker about the old-timey rules in the 5 books of Moses , but… are they missing something ?
At the time that this is being written , China is facing a nation-wide health scare .
2000+ people are infected with a disease that has killed ( officially ) 56 people .
It has confirmed cases in US and Canada , in at least 10 countries and three continents — and it ’ s just getting warmed up .
Early reports are that the Coronavirus traces its roots back to some , uh , ‘ exotic ’ food @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Killed A U.S. Medic In Afghanistan Is A Keynote Speaker At University Bats and snakes are among the suspected culprits .
The coronavirus spreading in China and the SARS outbreak of 2003 have two things in common : Both are from the coronavirus family and both were passed from animals to humans in a wet market .
… ” Poorly regulated live-animal markets mixed with illegal wildlife trade offer a unique opportunity for viruses to spill over from wildlife hosts into the human population , ” the Wildlife Conservation Society said in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of SARS , and probably this coronavirus outbreak too , bats were the original hosts .
They then infected other animals via their poop or saliva , and the unwitting intermediaries transmitted the virus to humans .
Source : BusinessInsider The virus appears to have originated in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan , a Chinese city about 650 miles south of Beijing that has a population of more than 11 million people .
The market sells fish , as well as a panoply of meat from other animals , including bats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shut down Jan. 1 .
“ Testing of animals in the Wuhan area , including sampling from the markets , will provide more information , ” said Raina MacIntyre , a head of the biosecurity research program at the University of New South Wales ’ Kirby Institute .
On Wednesday , a report in the Journal of Medical Virology by a team of Chinese researchers suggested snakes were the most probable wildlife animal reservoir for 2019-nCoV .
The work examined the genetic code of the virus and compared it with that of two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the Chinese cobra .
The research demonstrated that the snakes ’ genetic code displayed a high level of similarity with the virus .
Source : CNet Isn ’ t interesting how that much-maligned ‘ bronze age book ’ of faith and wisdom gives some pretty reliable guidelines about avoiding so many foods that carry the greatest medical risk ?
Pretty impressive feat for a book that predates our modern understanding of disease vectors and pathology , isn ’ t it ?
Kosher diets don ’ t include , for example , bats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about removing mold from a home , or condemning it .
It talks about destroying porous cooking tools that have been exposed to contaminants , and scrubbing durable non-porus ones .
This sets up the objection that Christians don ’ t keep kosher , that Jesus called ‘ all foods clean ’ .
If the dietary restrictions in Moses were so awesome , why would Jesus do that ?
Simple .
Jesus , who came first and foremost to defeat sin and death — was making a clear distinction between simple sanitation and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Religious blowhards ( in his day , ‘ Pharisees ’ ) tend to confuse the outward signs of rule-keeping with the life of inner integrity we are called to walk in .
As Jesus explained in the passage when he ‘ called all foods clean ’ : There is nothing outside a person that by going into him can defile him , but the things that come out of a person are what defile him.
” And when he had entered the house and left the people , his disciples asked him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to them , “ Then are you also without understanding ?
Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside can not defile him , since it enters not his heart but his stomach , and is expelled ?
” ( Thus he declared all foods clean . )
And he said , “ What comes out of a person is what defiles him .
For from within , out of the heart of man , come evil thoughts , sexual immorality , theft , murder , adultery , coveting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ envy , slander , pride , foolishness .
All these evil things come from within , and they defile a person.
” But even if Christians do not keep kosher , there is a tradition among many Christianized nations of having lines they won ’ t cross , and food they won ’ t eat .

Skeptics love to snicker about the old-timey rules in the 5 books of Moses, but… are they missing something?
At the time that this is being written, China is facing a nation-wide health scare. 2000+ people are infected with a disease that has killed (officially) 56 people.
It has confirmed cases in US and Canada, in at least 10 countries and three continents — and it’s just getting warmed up.
Early reports are that the Coronavirus traces its roots back to some, uh, ‘exotic’ food choices.
Bats and snakes are among the suspected culprits.
The coronavirus spreading in China and the SARS outbreak of 2003 have two things in common: Both are from the coronavirus family and both were passed from animals to humans in a wet market. …”Poorly regulated live-animal markets mixed with illegal wildlife trade offer a unique opportunity for viruses to spill over from wildlife hosts into the human population,” the Wildlife Conservation Society said in a statement on Thursday. In the case of SARS, and probably this coronavirus outbreak too, bats were the original hosts. They then infected other animals via their poop or saliva, and the unwitting intermediaries transmitted the virus to humans.
Source: BusinessInsider
Some foods aren’t just nasty, they’re dangerous.
The virus appears to have originated in the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, a Chinese city about 650 miles south of Beijing that has a population of more than 11 million people. The market sells fish, as well as a panoply of meat from other animals, including bats and snakes. The Wuhan market was shut down Jan. 1. “Testing of animals in the Wuhan area, including sampling from the markets, will provide more information,” said Raina MacIntyre, a head of the biosecurity research program at the University of New South Wales’ Kirby Institute. On Wednesday, a report in the Journal of Medical Virology by a team of Chinese researchers suggested snakes were the most probable wildlife animal reservoir for 2019-nCoV. The work examined the genetic code of the virus and compared it with that of two types of snakes, the many-banded krait and the Chinese cobra. The research demonstrated that the snakes’ genetic code displayed a high level of similarity with the virus.
Source: CNet
Isn’t interesting how that much-maligned ‘bronze age book’ of faith and wisdom gives some pretty reliable guidelines about avoiding so many foods that carry the greatest medical risk? Pretty impressive feat for a book that predates our modern understanding of disease vectors and pathology, isn’t it?
Kosher diets don’t include, for example, bats or snakes.
Scripture gives good advice about removing mold from a home, or condemning it. It talks about destroying porous cooking tools that have been exposed to contaminants, and scrubbing durable non-porus ones.
This sets up the objection that Christians don’t keep kosher, that Jesus called ‘all foods clean’. If the dietary restrictions in Moses were so awesome, why would Jesus do that?
Simple. Jesus, who came first and foremost to defeat sin and death — was making a clear distinction between simple sanitation and the much deeper issue of moral purity. Religious blowhards (in his day, ‘Pharisees’) tend to confuse the outward signs of rule-keeping with the life of inner integrity we are called to walk in.
As Jesus explained in the passage when he ‘called all foods clean’:
There is nothing outside a person that by going into him can defile him, but the things that come out of a person are what defile him.” And when he had entered the house and left the people, his disciples asked him about the parable. And he said to them, “Then are you also without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him, since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.) And he said, “What comes out of a person is what defiles him. For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, coveting, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride, foolishness. All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”
But even if Christians do not keep kosher, there is a tradition among many Christianized nations of having lines they won’t cross, and food they won’t eat.


clashdaily--2020-01-26--Biden Throws Blacks Another Racist Dog Biscuit

As usual , fake news media ignored a Democrat irresponsibly throwing a racial-hate-generating grenade into a crowd of blacks .
On MLK day 2020 , Joe Biden referred to Trump as “ this president and his Ku Klux Klan… ” This is extremely evil when you understand that Biden knows his accusation is absurd and easily proven false .
Biden thought he was simply throwing the dumb black congregation a vote-winning racist dog biscuit .
As a black and grateful proud American , it turns my stomach the way Democrats repeatedly pander to us , pretending race relations in America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Irresponsibly , Hollywood , public education and fake news media join Democrats in selling black America their absurd lie that America is a hellhole of racism , overrun with white supremacists and KKK members .
It is all a huge scheme to keep blacks believing they are victims , voting for Democrats to keep rabid racist white America at bay .
This Democrat lie is insidiously evil and destructive when you consider that America is the greatest land of opportunity on the planet for all who choose to pursue their dreams .
Not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ race relations , they thrive on it .
They seek to create as much racial division and hate as possible .
Trending : Convicted Terrorist Who Killed A U.S. Medic In Afghanistan Is A Keynote Speaker At University On the anniversary of the shooting in Ferguson Missouri , Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren despicably ran to microphones to proclaim that black Michael Brown was murdered by a racist white cop .
This is a bald-faced lie , proven untrue by evidence presented to a grand jury .
Throwing her racist dog biscuit to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and calculated campaign trick to win black votes .
Folks , this evil Democrat lie that Brown was shot in cold blood by a racist cop has caused many of our brave men in blue to be ambushed and assassinated across America in revenge .
Warren has zero compassion for the fatherless children and widows created by Democrats ’ Brown-was-murdered lie .
This serial-lying wicked woman must never come anywhere near the seat of international power .
Because I am an outspoken black Christian , conservative and Republican , white Democrats have freely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social media for decades ; even threatening my life .
It is not a stretch to believe they use the same vitriolic language at their high-dollar-fundraiser cocktail parties .
We got those n*****s right where we want them .
Blacks are only 13 % of the population which means white America obviously elected Obama two times .
And yet , we successfully convinced stupid blacks to believe a majority of white Americans would never vote for a black man to be leader of the free world .
I have been confronted by brain-dead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Uncle Tom for rejecting the absurd Democrat narrative that somehow Obama was elected under the radar of white America .
How long will Democrats get away with playing us blacks for a bunch of useful idiots every election cycle ; throwing us racism dog biscuits to keep us lapping around at their feet for more as they pet us on our heads for good luck ?
A caller on the Rush Limbaugh radio show said Conservatism is really about love .
I could not agree more .
I became a conservative decades ago @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jr ’ s dream that people should be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin .
I connected with Ronald Reagan ’ s call for all Americans to be the best they can be .
I rejected Democrats ’ message of victim-hood-ism , class envy and racial hate .
Democrats are more determined than ever to punish the hard work of Peter to gift the fruits of his labor to lazy trifling Paul .
Insanely , they even want to give Peter ’ s hard-earned money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ instilling hate and victim mindsets , Conservatism encourages and celebrates all Americans becoming their best .
Democrats have been deceiving blacks for 50 years , throwing them racism dog biscuits .
Due to their faithful monolithic voting for Democrats , blacks are suffering big-time in Democrat-controlled cities ; epidemic school dropouts , high incarcerations , high fatherless households , generational poverty and record-breaking black on black homicides .
Meanwhile , Joe Biden is on the campaign trail claiming the most black-power creating president in U.S. History is the leader of the Ku Klux @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a long history of hiring , empowering , advocating and promoting blacks , his presidency has black unemployment at its lowest in U.S. History .
http : //bit.ly/32VA6Sk How many stupid blacks will stay on the Democrats ’ plantation , believing Biden ’ s outrageous lie that Trump is a n*****-hating white supremacist ?
My fellow black Americans , please stop scarfing up Democrats ’ racist dog biscuits .
Trump is offering blacks “ real ” hope and change .
C ’ mon , black brother and sister Americans .
It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

As usual, fake news media ignored a Democrat irresponsibly throwing a racial-hate-generating grenade into a crowd of blacks. On MLK day 2020, Joe Biden referred to Trump as “this president and his Ku Klux Klan…” This is extremely evil when you understand that Biden knows his accusation is absurd and easily proven false. Biden thought he was simply throwing the dumb black congregation a vote-winning racist dog biscuit.
As a black and grateful proud American, it turns my stomach the way Democrats repeatedly pander to us, pretending race relations in America have not progressed beyond the 1950s.
Irresponsibly, Hollywood, public education and fake news media join Democrats in selling black America their absurd lie that America is a hellhole of racism, overrun with white supremacists and KKK members. It is all a huge scheme to keep blacks believing they are victims, voting for Democrats to keep rabid racist white America at bay. This Democrat lie is insidiously evil and destructive when you consider that America is the greatest land of opportunity on the planet for all who choose to pursue their dreams.
Not only are Democrats not concerned about strained race relations, they thrive on it. They seek to create as much racial division and hate as possible.
On the anniversary of the shooting in Ferguson Missouri, Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren despicably ran to microphones to proclaim that black Michael Brown was murdered by a racist white cop. This is a bald-faced lie, proven untrue by evidence presented to a grand jury. Throwing her racist dog biscuit to blacks was Warren’s evil cold and calculated campaign trick to win black votes.
Folks, this evil Democrat lie that Brown was shot in cold blood by a racist cop has caused many of our brave men in blue to be ambushed and assassinated across America in revenge. Warren has zero compassion for the fatherless children and widows created by Democrats’ Brown-was-murdered lie. This serial-lying wicked woman must never come anywhere near the seat of international power.
Because I am an outspoken black Christian, conservative and Republican, white Democrats have freely called me a stupid n***** all over social media for decades; even threatening my life.
It is not a stretch to believe they use the same vitriolic language at their high-dollar-fundraiser cocktail parties. We got those n*****s right where we want them. Blacks are only 13% of the population which means white America obviously elected Obama two times. And yet, we successfully convinced stupid blacks to believe a majority of white Americans would never vote for a black man to be leader of the free world.
I have been confronted by brain-dead black Democrat loyalists who call me an Uncle Tom for rejecting the absurd Democrat narrative that somehow Obama was elected under the radar of white America.
How long will Democrats get away with playing us blacks for a bunch of useful idiots every election cycle; throwing us racism dog biscuits to keep us lapping around at their feet for more as they pet us on our heads for good luck?
A caller on the Rush Limbaugh radio show said Conservatism is really about love. I could not agree more. I became a conservative decades ago because I embraced Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s dream that people should be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. I connected with Ronald Reagan’s call for all Americans to be the best they can be.
I rejected Democrats’ message of victim-hood-ism, class envy and racial hate. Democrats are more determined than ever to punish the hard work of Peter to gift the fruits of his labor to lazy trifling Paul. Insanely, they even want to give Peter’s hard-earned money to illegal aliens.
Rather than relentlessly instilling hate and victim mindsets, Conservatism encourages and celebrates all Americans becoming their best.
Democrats have been deceiving blacks for 50 years, throwing them racism dog biscuits. Due to their faithful monolithic voting for Democrats, blacks are suffering big-time in Democrat-controlled cities; epidemic school dropouts, high incarcerations, high fatherless households, generational poverty and record-breaking black on black homicides.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden is on the campaign trail claiming the most black-power creating president in U.S. History is the leader of the Ku Klux Klan. Not only does Trump have a long history of hiring, empowering, advocating and promoting blacks, his presidency has black unemployment at its lowest in U.S. History. http://bit.ly/32VA6Sk
How many stupid blacks will stay on the Democrats’ plantation, believing Biden’s outrageous lie that Trump is a n*****-hating white supremacist? My fellow black Americans, please stop scarfing up Democrats’ racist dog biscuits.
Trump is offering blacks “real” hope and change. C’mon, black brother and sister Americans. It’s time to get onboard the Trump Train.
Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American
Help Lloyd spread the Truth
http://LloydMarcus.com


clashdaily--2020-01-26--WATCH: Will Smith Has A Message About Gun Safety That Hollywood WON’T Love

This is a good use of what people call a ‘ teachable moment ’ .
Will Smith , like most @ @ @ @ @ fair bit of time around firearms .
But this isn ’ t a video for @ @ @ @ @ one is a reminder about responsible gun ownership .
For example , responsible gun owners @ @ @ @ @ anyone .
Trending : Convicted Terrorist Who Killed A U.S. Medic In Afghanistan Is A @ @ @ @ @ video itself was real .
Will Smith ’ s reaction was real .
The end @ @ @ @ @ couple of liberties the guy who filmed it took .
Like the cut scene when @ @ @ @ @ But the point he makes still holds true .
That WAS terrible gun safety .
@ @ @ @ @ to handle a firearm , do it right .
If you liked this story , @ @ @ @ @ too : EPIC VIDEO : ‘ Good Patriot ’ Films Little Girls ’ & Grandmas @ @ @ @ @ AR-15 !

This is a good use of what people call a ‘teachable moment’.
Will Smith, like most Hollywood elites, spends a fair bit of time around firearms. But this isn’t a video for the Gun grabbers.
This one is a reminder about responsible gun ownership.
For example, responsible gun owners never point a gun at anyone.re he
The video itself was real. Will Smith’s reaction was real.
The end of the video explains a couple of liberties the guy who filmed it took.
Like the cut scene where he shows off his skills.
But the point he makes still holds true. That WAS terrible gun safety.
If you’re going to handle a firearm, do it right.
EVERY time.
If you liked this story, check these ones out, too:
WATCH: Halle Barry’s Weapon Skills Are Pretty D@mn Impressive
EPIC VIDEO: ‘Good Patriot’ Films Little Girls’ & Grandmas’ First Time Shooting An AR-15!
Hey Patriots: The Gilboa Double-Barrel AR-15 Will Give Gun-Grabbers Night Sweats (Video)