clashdaily--2020-06-17--Aunt Jemima Has Been Rebranded Because Of ‘Racist Stereotypes’–Is Uncle Ben Next?

The black , female face of a beloved brand has been removed after 131 years .
Don ’ t think it ’ s over yet .
Quaker Foods announced today that after more than a century , they are rebranding their line of pancake mixes and syrups and the “ Aunt Jemima ” character will be removed from the packaging .
There was no “ Aunt Jemima ” involved in creating the products , she ’ s just a character used as a marketing tool by the creators to sell their pancake mix .
Trending : WATCH : Dr. Fauci @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Early In The Pandemic And WHY The Aunt Jemima brand was started in 1889 by two men , Chris Rutt and Charles Underwood , who developed a ready pancake mix .
The company brought on a black woman , Anna Robinson , to portray Aunt Jemima starting in 1933 .
The character was later portrayed by actress Aylene Lewis in the 1950s and 60s .
In 1989 , Aunt Jemima ’ s image evolved to what the company described as a “ contemporary look ” with pearl earrings and a lace collar .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ brand was criticized for being based on racial stereotypes .
In 2014 , distant family members of Nancy Green and Anna Short Harrington , the models who portrayed “ Aunt Jemima ” over the years , tried to sue Quaker Foods and their parent company , Pepsi Co. for $ 3 billion in unpaid royalties , but the lawsuit didn ’ t go anywhere .
Introduced in 1889 , “ Aunt Jemima ” was inspired by a minstrel character , a black woman with a kerchief over her hair and a wide smile @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Aunt Jemima ” by Billy Kersand .
Over the years , her image was updated , but the history remains .
“ We recognize Aunt Jemima ’ s origins are based on a racial stereotype , ” Kristin Kroepfl , vice president and chief marketing officer of Quaker Foods North America , said in a press release first reported by NBC News .
“ As we work to make progress toward racial equality through several initiatives , we also must take a hard look at our portfolio of brands and ensure they reflect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expectations.
” The details aren ’ t clear about what the new name will be , what the packaging will look like , or when the relaunch will be , but the rebrand is expected to occur by the fall .
Quaker Foods was purchased by Pepsi Co. in 2001 , and they ’ ve been committed to the left ’ s version of anti-racism which embraces the left ’ s ideology of white oppressors and black victims that is systemic and entrenched in the fabric of America .
But if you think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with Aunt Jemima , you ’ re wrong .
They ’ re already looking at Uncle Ben ’ s rice and the chef on the Cream of Wheat box .
When you look back at old ads of these brands , they do carry those pretty awful Jim Crow-era racial stereotypes .
But they ’ ve also been updated and unless you ’ re someone who researches the history of brands , you wouldn ’ t know that .
But it ’ s not just the old brands with some definitely cringe-inducing ads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Member of Parliament for the Labour Party has noticed that Rice Krispies has “ three white boys ” and Coco Pops has a monkey on the box .
The left isn ’ t just toppling statues , demonetizing based on comment sections , “ decolonizing ” your bookshelf , it ’ s also trying to erase “ systemic racism ” from grocery store shelves .
Who could have imagined that we ’ d be so “ woke ” as a society that we ’ ve begun to Censor All Of The Things @ @ @ @ @ @ @ next ?
Will it be “ Larry ” from Quaker Oats since statues of abolitionist Quakers are already being torn down… …or will it be “ Lucky ” from Lucky Charms ?

The black, female face of a beloved brand has been removed after 131 years. Don’t think it’s over yet.
The left has successfully “canceled” Aunt Jemima.
Quaker Foods announced today that after more than a century, they are rebranding their line of pancake mixes and syrups and the “Aunt Jemima” character will be removed from the packaging.
There was no “Aunt Jemima” involved in creating the products, she’s just a character used as a marketing tool by the creators to sell their pancake mix.
The Aunt Jemima brand was started in 1889 by two men, Chris Rutt and Charles Underwood, who developed a ready pancake mix. The company brought on a black woman, Anna Robinson, to portray Aunt Jemima starting in 1933. The character was later portrayed by actress Aylene Lewis in the 1950s and 60s. In 1989, Aunt Jemima’s image evolved to what the company described as a “contemporary look” with pearl earrings and a lace collar. Source: ABC News
Over the years, the Aunt Jemima brand was criticized for being based on racial stereotypes.
In 2014, distant family members of Nancy Green and Anna Short Harrington, the models who portrayed “Aunt Jemima” over the years, tried to sue Quaker Foods and their parent company, Pepsi Co. for $3 billion in unpaid royalties, but the lawsuit didn’t go anywhere.
Introduced in 1889, “Aunt Jemima” was inspired by a minstrel character, a black woman with a kerchief over her hair and a wide smile, from a song, “Old Aunt Jemima” by Billy Kersand. Over the years, her image was updated, but the history remains. “We recognize Aunt Jemima’s origins are based on a racial stereotype,” Kristin Kroepfl, vice president and chief marketing officer of Quaker Foods North America, said in a press release first reported by NBC News. “As we work to make progress toward racial equality through several initiatives, we also must take a hard look at our portfolio of brands and ensure they reflect our values and meet our consumers’ expectations.” Source: The Hill
The details aren’t clear about what the new name will be, what the packaging will look like, or when the relaunch will be, but the rebrand is expected to occur by the fall.
Quaker Foods was purchased by Pepsi Co. in 2001, and they’ve been committed to the left’s version of anti-racism which embraces the left’s ideology of white oppressors and black victims that is systemic and entrenched in the fabric of America.
Our past mistakes won’t stop our actions. Read how we are bringing about change: https://t.co/N1JwrDOBcf Black Lives Matter. https://t.co/kqT8gFFMNS — Pepsi (@pepsi) June 16, 2020
JUST IN | After 131 years, PepsiCo is retiring the controversial brand name and mascot, Aunt Jemima, acknowledging that the brand is based on a racial stereotype. https://t.co/SVQDJ62oPv pic.twitter.com/72XFuYOh9R — Adweek (@Adweek) June 17, 2020
But if you think that the rebranding is going to stop with Aunt Jemima, you’re wrong. They’re already looking at Uncle Ben’s rice and the chef on the Cream of Wheat box.
“We recognize Aunt Jemima’s origins are based on a racial stereotype." The company announced it will donate at least $5 million over the next five years "to create meaningful, ongoing support and engagement in the Black community." *Looks at Uncle Ben's*: https://t.co/gfCpKTbxZT — Errin Haines ???? (@emarvelous) June 17, 2020
As we talk about Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben, please don't forget about Rastus (that is the characters name, look up what Rastus means) from Cream of Wheat. pic.twitter.com/luklkfK3IF — K. Renae P. (@KRenaeP) June 17, 2020
When you look back at old ads of these brands, they do carry those pretty awful Jim Crow-era racial stereotypes. But they’ve also been updated and unless you’re someone who researches the history of brands, you wouldn’t know that.
But it’s not just the old brands with some definitely cringe-inducing ads from decades ago, a former U.K. Member of Parliament for the Labour Party has noticed that Rice Krispies has “three white boys” and Coco Pops has a monkey on the box.
@KelloggsUK, as you are yet to reply to my email – Coco Pops and Rice Krispies have the same compòsition (except for the fact CP's are brown and chocolate flavoured)… so I was wondering why Rice Krispies have three white boys representing the brand and Coco Pops have a monkey? — Fiona Onasanya (@Fiona_Onasanya) June 15, 2020
The left isn’t just toppling statues, demonetizing based on comment sections, “decolonizing” your bookshelf, it’s also trying to erase “systemic racism” from grocery store shelves.
Who could have imagined that we’d be so “woke” as a society that we’ve begun to Censor All Of The Things?
Who do you think will be next?
Will it be “Larry” from Quaker Oats since statues of abolitionist Quakers are already being torn down…
…or will it be “Lucky” from Lucky Charms?


clashdaily--2020-06-17--The New Trojan Horse: Black Lives Matter Deconstructed

If you wanted to destroy America from within , how would you do it ?
A good place to start would be to attack its values , especially the respect we have for the rule of law .
Such an attack is taking place before our eyes .
We have ceded our cities to the mob , also known as Black Lives Matter .
BLM is a cover for attempted political control by the Left .
It is a criminal enterprise using race as an excuse for the violent overthrow of the civil society .
Based on the false narrative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ places the blame for all the ills of black America on the shoulders of a so-called tradition of white racism .
Racism justifies everything , they insist , including the use of violence .
“ BLM believes in force , ” says Fox ’ s Tucker Carlson .
“ They flood the streets with angry young people who break things and hurt anyone who gets in the way .
Until violence stops working , violence will continue.
” A member of the Seattle BLM mob said , “ We know that when we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we want.
” Black author Shelby Steele , in White Guilt : How Blacks and Whites Together Destroyed the Promise of the Civil Rights Era , explained the birth of BLM this way : “ By 1968 black anger and militancy had replaced the passivism of the King era as the best means to opportunity and power for blacks .
Anger in the oppressed is a response to perceived opportunity , not to injustice .
Black rage is always a kind of opportunism.
” The non-violent approach endorsed by Martin Luther King was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ radical subset of the black community understood that white guilt offered a more seductive prize than non-violence .
White guilt is a powerful force that many believe was responsible for the election of Barack Obama .
“ For black leaders in the age of white guilt , ” Steele writes , “ the problem was how to seize all they could get from white guilt without having to show actual events of racism.
” The solution offered by BLM was systemic racism .
Its existence could be proved by the smallest racial incident @ @ @ @ @ @ @ man being beaten by police could trigger a massive riot , ” Steele says .
BLM launched a riot to “ the scale of systemic racism rather than to the scale of the single racist event.
” It explains how an isolated incidence of police brutality in Minneapolis caused massive demonstrations throughout the nation and the world .
Trending : WATCH : Dr. Fauci Admits That Americans Were Misled About Mask-Use Early In The Pandemic And WHY Contrary to the BLM version of events , what happened to George Floyd was an isolated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vast majority of police treat black suspects , nor is it proof that America suffers from systemic racism .
“ America , ” David Horowitz wrote in Big Agenda , “ is arguably the most tolerant , least racist nation on earth.
” Blacks , and especially BLM , have decided to blame whites instead of acknowledging that they themselves are at fault .
The unwillingness to acknowledge Floyd ’ s violent criminal record illustrates how blacks have avoided taking responsibility for their collective behavior .
Portraying America as “ an incurable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the words of Ben Shapiro , has become a national pastime .
But is it true ?
Black America , says Shelby Steele , “ no longer has the excuse of oppression .
Without oppression—and it must be acknowledged that blacks are no longer oppressed in America—the group itself becomes automatically responsible for its inferiority and non-competitiveness.
” It is much easier to avoid that responsibility “ by arguing that whites should be responsible for our development .
And so , once again severed from responsibility we became slaves again , our fate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a major role in Black Lives Matter .
“ When America acknowledged its racism , it effectively made blacks into the nation ’ s official and , seemingly , permanent victims , ” says Steele .
“ It was an injustice to make victims responsible for their own problems .
To do so would be to ‘ blame the victim , ’ thereby repeating his victimization .
Now I was the one—as a victim—who possessed an almost reckless moral authority .
Now I could shame and silence whites at will .
This power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concessions from the larger society on the basis of past victimization became the new ‘ black power.
’ It evolved into what we call today ‘ the race card.
’ Now America had to prove itself to me.
” BLM would not be flourishing without the enthusiastic collaboration of whites .
According to Rasmussen polls , an astounding 62 percent of likely voters have a favorable opinion of BLM .
Millions are being donated by virtue-signaling sycophants .
That seems to include Corporate America .
Disney , for example , is giving “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same time it is boycotting Fox News host Tucker Carlson because Carlson expressed deep criticism of what he calls the most powerful political force in the country .
Contrary to leftist propaganda , BLM is an anti-First Amendment gang that advocates the dissolution of the nuclear family , disbanding the police , and reparations for blacks .
I was reluctant to believe that whites are partaking of the BLM Kool-Aid until someone showed me a video of a large crowd of whites on their knees in Bethesda , Maryland , as they were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ racism .
It reminded me of the Chinese Cultural Revolution where victims were forced to admit various crimes before a crowd of people who would verbally and physically abuse them .
It is an indication of the power of white guilt .
On a more personal level , a woman I have known for 20 years , on discovering my disapproval of BLM , wrote this : “ I am astonished and crushed .
I thought you were better , more loving and smarter than this.
” Yes , I am no longer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ am , instead , a racist .
This is how people are intimidated by the BLM agenda .
“ BLM now enjoys almost complete immunity from criticism , ” says Carlson .
Saying that “ all lives matter ” is considered hate speech .
People are being fired from their jobs for uttering those simple words .
In all probability , I will be struck by lightning just for writing this article .
If white guilt becomes an unchallenged dogma , hate against whites will increase as nonwhites are told to blame their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and are taught to see Western history as one long tale of oppression .
Eventually there will be a white backlash .
That is part of the Left ’ s program .
A civil war between races and ethnic groups is entirely possible .
It is happening now in France between native-born French and Muslim immigrants .
It can happen to us .
Instead of making everyone feel they are part of a unified American social structure , the Left ’ s strategy is “ divide and conquer.
” Their aim is what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of society .
BLM supports this objective .
“ Democrats , ” Tucker Carlson says , “ believe their long-term goals align with those of BLM.
” In other words , the Democratic Party hopes to gain power through anarchy and the mob .
We can ’ t afford the luxury of embracing the violence of Black Lives Matter .
A civilized society can not tolerate lawlessness .
The section of Seattle controlled by the mob is a phenomenon that , if not checked , will spread throughout the country like a cancer @

If you wanted to destroy America from within, how would you do it? A good place to start would be to attack its values, especially the respect we have for the rule of law. Such an attack is taking place before our eyes. We have ceded our cities to the mob, also known as Black Lives Matter.
BLM is a cover for attempted political control by the Left. It is a criminal enterprise using race as an excuse for the violent overthrow of the civil society. Based on the false narrative that cops are killing blacks, BLM places the blame for all the ills of black America on the shoulders of a so-called tradition of white racism. Racism justifies everything, they insist, including the use of violence. “BLM believes in force,” says Fox’s Tucker Carlson. “They flood the streets with angry young people who break things and hurt anyone who gets in the way. Until violence stops working, violence will continue.” A member of the Seattle BLM mob said, “We know that when we burn things down, we get what we want.”
Black author Shelby Steele, in White Guilt: How Blacks and Whites Together Destroyed the Promise of the Civil Rights Era, explained the birth of BLM this way: “By 1968 black anger and militancy had replaced the passivism of the King era as the best means to opportunity and power for blacks. Anger in the oppressed is a response to perceived opportunity, not to injustice. Black rage is always a kind of opportunism.” The non-violent approach endorsed by Martin Luther King was not producing sufficient “opportunity.”
A radical subset of the black community understood that white guilt offered a more seductive prize than non-violence. White guilt is a powerful force that many believe was responsible for the election of Barack Obama. “For black leaders in the age of white guilt,” Steele writes, “the problem was how to seize all they could get from white guilt without having to show actual events of racism.” The solution offered by BLM was systemic racism. Its existence could be proved by the smallest racial incident. “This is why one black man being beaten by police could trigger a massive riot,” Steele says. BLM launched a riot to “the scale of systemic racism rather than to the scale of the single racist event.” It explains how an isolated incidence of police brutality in Minneapolis caused massive demonstrations throughout the nation and the world.
Contrary to the BLM version of events, what happened to George Floyd was an isolated event. It does not represent how the vast majority of police treat black suspects, nor is it proof that America suffers from systemic racism. “America,” David Horowitz wrote in Big Agenda, “is arguably the most tolerant, least racist nation on earth.” Blacks, and especially BLM, have decided to blame whites instead of acknowledging that they themselves are at fault. The unwillingness to acknowledge Floyd’s violent criminal record illustrates how blacks have avoided taking responsibility for their collective behavior.
Portraying America as “an incurable mass of bigoted whites,” in the words of Ben Shapiro, has become a national pastime. But is it true? Black America, says Shelby Steele, “no longer has the excuse of oppression. Without oppression—and it must be acknowledged that blacks are no longer oppressed in America—the group itself becomes automatically responsible for its inferiority and non-competitiveness.” It is much easier to avoid that responsibility “by arguing that whites should be responsible for our development. And so, once again severed from responsibility we became slaves again, our fate the responsibility of others.”
Victimization plays a major role in Black Lives Matter. “When America acknowledged its racism, it effectively made blacks into the nation’s official and, seemingly, permanent victims,” says Steele. “It was an injustice to make victims responsible for their own problems. To do so would be to ‘blame the victim,’ thereby repeating his victimization. Now I was the one—as a victim—who possessed an almost reckless moral authority. Now I could shame and silence whites at will. This power to shame, silence, and muscle concessions from the larger society on the basis of past victimization became the new ‘black power.’ It evolved into what we call today ‘the race card.’ Now America had to prove itself to me.”
BLM would not be flourishing without the enthusiastic collaboration of whites. According to Rasmussen polls, an astounding 62 percent of likely voters have a favorable opinion of BLM. Millions are being donated by virtue-signaling sycophants. That seems to include Corporate America. Disney, for example, is giving “full-throated support” to BLM at the same time it is boycotting Fox News host Tucker Carlson because Carlson expressed deep criticism of what he calls the most powerful political force in the country. Contrary to leftist propaganda, BLM is an anti-First Amendment gang that advocates the dissolution of the nuclear family, disbanding the police, and reparations for blacks.
I was reluctant to believe that whites are partaking of the BLM Kool-Aid until someone showed me a video of a large crowd of whites on their knees in Bethesda, Maryland, as they were led through a mass confession of their racism. It reminded me of the Chinese Cultural Revolution where victims were forced to admit various crimes before a crowd of people who would verbally and physically abuse them. It is an indication of the power of white guilt. On a more personal level, a woman I have known for 20 years, on discovering my disapproval of BLM, wrote this: “I am astonished and crushed. I thought you were better, more loving and smarter than this.” Yes, I am no longer the loving person she knew. I am, instead, a racist. This is how people are intimidated by the BLM agenda. “BLM now enjoys almost complete immunity from criticism,” says Carlson. Saying that “all lives matter” is considered hate speech. People are being fired from their jobs for uttering those simple words. In all probability, I will be struck by lightning just for writing this article.
If white guilt becomes an unchallenged dogma, hate against whites will increase as nonwhites are told to blame their failures in life on white supremacy, and are taught to see Western history as one long tale of oppression. Eventually there will be a white backlash. That is part of the Left’s program. A civil war between races and ethnic groups is entirely possible. It is happening now in France between native-born French and Muslim immigrants. It can happen to us. Instead of making everyone feel they are part of a unified American social structure, the Left’s strategy is “divide and conquer.” Their aim is what Mark Levin calls the “balkanization” of society. BLM supports this objective.
“Democrats,” Tucker Carlson says, “believe their long-term goals align with those of BLM.” In other words, the Democratic Party hopes to gain power through anarchy and the mob. We can’t afford the luxury of embracing the violence of Black Lives Matter. A civilized society cannot tolerate lawlessness. The section of Seattle controlled by the mob is a phenomenon that, if not checked, will spread throughout the country like a cancer.


clashdaily--2020-06-17--WATCH: Dr. Fauci Admits That Americans Were Misled About Mask-Use Early In The Pandemic And WHY

To mask or not to mask , that is the question .
And the answer isn ’ t so clear–we ’ ve been getting conflicting information from the get-go .
We have been told that : • masks should be reserved for healthcare professionals and those at high-risk of infection • some sort of face-covering no matter how simple is a must • only some masks are effective and must be properly fitted • they don ’ t do much to prevent contracting the virus so are used to prevent transmission of it • they do prevent contracting the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can even provide a false sense of security .
Sometimes all of these claims are by the same health expert .
One example is the conflicting information provided by Dr. Anthony Fauci , an infectious disease expert and member of the Coronavirus Task Force .
Latest : WATCH : A Group Of Medical Professionals Saying 'Black Lives Matter ' Stumped By Honest Bro Filming Them What are we supposed to believe with so much contradicting information ?
Here is Dr. Fauci last month saying that masks were largely unnecessary .
On June 12 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fauci says that masks are effective and that the U.S. public wasn ’ t told that early on in order to prevent a shortage for healthcare workers .
Host Katherine Ross asks what the deal is on masks and why we were told not to wear them early in the spring and are being urged to now .
FAUCI : Masks are not 100 percent protective .
However , they certainly are better than not wearing a mask .
Both to prevent you , if you happen to be a person who maybe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infection that you don ’ t even know about , to prevent you from infecting someone else .
But also , it can protect you a certain degree , not a hundred percent , in protecting you from getting infected from someone who , either is breathing , or coughing , or sneezing , or singing , or whatever it is in which the droplets or the aerosols go out .
So masks work .
The important thing is actually physical separation .
So , physical separation that we talk about all the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get a virus not to get to you , but often it ’ s impossible , physically , logistically to be physically separated to the right extent from everyone .
So that ’ s the reason why you combine physical separation with a mask , even though a mask isn ’ t 100 percent protective .
But it does give you some protection , so you shouldn ’ t discount that .
Now , getting back to your first question , which was , what about a month or so or two or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you don ’ t really need to wear a mask.
” Well , the reason for that is that we were concerned–the public health community–and many people were saying this , were concerned that it was at a time when the N-95 masks and the surgical masks were in very short supply , and we wanted to make sure that the people–namely , the healthcare workers who were brave enough to put themselves in harm ’ s way to take care of people who you know were infected with the coronavirus and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want them to be without the equipment that they needed so there was not enthusiasm about everybody going out and buying a mask or getting a mask .
We were afraid that that would deter away from the people that really needed it .
Now we have masks and we know that you don ’ t need an N-95 if you ’ re a person , an ordinary person in the street .
We also know that simple cloth coverings that many people have can work as well as a mask in cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the recommendation is , when you ’ re out there , particularly if you ’ re out there in a situation where there ’ s active infection , keep the distance physically and wear a mask .
So , although there appear to be some contradictions of we ’ re saying this then , and why are you saying this now , actually the circumstances have changed .
That ’ s the reason why .
It ’ s not unusual these days for people to be wearing a mask when it isn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ walking around outside with no one around them Some of this is just really , really silly .
The likelihood of outdoor transmission is very low , especially if you keep that 6′ social distance guideline .
But also , are you going to get the virus from your dog , or driving alone in your car ?
Clearly , there are some really fearful people out there taking precautions to the extreme .
Also , experts have to be better about explaining proper mask use and when it ’ s required .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to go through all this ?
It looks like it ’ s not going to end anytime soon .
According to Trish Greenhalgh , a primary-care professor at the University of Oxford , we ’ re going to be wearing masks until “ there are no new cases , or very few cases.
” Buckle up , kiddies , it looks like it might be a while .

To mask or not to mask, that is the question.
And the answer isn’t so clear–we’ve been getting conflicting information from the get-go.
We have been told that:
masks should be reserved for healthcare professionals and those at high-risk of infection
some sort of face-covering no matter how simple is a must
only some masks are effective and must be properly fitted
they don’t do much to prevent contracting the virus so are used to prevent transmission of it
they do prevent contracting the virus
masks are pretty much ineffective and can even provide a false sense of security.
Sometimes all of these claims are by the same health expert. One example is the conflicting information provided by Dr. Anthony Fauci, an infectious disease expert and member of the Coronavirus Task Force.
What are we supposed to believe with so much contradicting information?
Here is Dr. Fauci last month saying that masks were largely unnecessary.
On June 12, speaking to The Street, Dr. Fauci says that masks are effective and that the U.S. public wasn’t told that early on in order to prevent a shortage for healthcare workers.
Host Katherine Ross asks what the deal is on masks and why we were told not to wear them early in the spring and are being urged to now.
FAUCI: Masks are not 100 percent protective. However, they certainly are better than not wearing a mask. Both to prevent you, if you happen to be a person who maybe feels well, but has an asymptomatic infection that you don’t even know about, to prevent you from infecting someone else. But also, it can protect you a certain degree, not a hundred percent, in protecting you from getting infected from someone who, either is breathing, or coughing, or sneezing, or singing, or whatever it is in which the droplets or the aerosols go out. So masks work. The important thing is actually physical separation. So, physical separation that we talk about all the time, is the best way to get a virus not to get to you, but often it’s impossible, physically, logistically to be physically separated to the right extent from everyone. So that’s the reason why you combine physical separation with a mask, even though a mask isn’t 100 percent protective. But it does give you some protection, so you shouldn’t discount that. Now, getting back to your first question, which was, what about a month or so or two or three ago when people were saying “you don’t really need to wear a mask.” Well, the reason for that is that we were concerned–the public health community–and many people were saying this, were concerned that it was at a time when the N-95 masks and the surgical masks were in very short supply, and we wanted to make sure that the people–namely, the healthcare workers who were brave enough to put themselves in harm’s way to take care of people who you know were infected with the coronavirus and the danger of them getting infected–we did not want them to be without the equipment that they needed so there was not enthusiasm about everybody going out and buying a mask or getting a mask. We were afraid that that would deter away from the people that really needed it. Now we have masks and we know that you don’t need an N-95 if you’re a person, an ordinary person in the street. We also know that simple cloth coverings that many people have can work as well as a mask in cases. So, right now, unequivocally, the recommendation is, when you’re out there, particularly if you’re out there in a situation where there’s active infection, keep the distance physically and wear a mask. So, although there appear to be some contradictions of we’re saying this then, and why are you saying this now, actually the circumstances have changed. That’s the reason why.
It’s not unusual these days for people to be wearing a mask when it isn’t really necessary like:
walking around outside with no one around them
running or biking
driving their car
walking their dog
Some of this is just really, really silly. The likelihood of outdoor transmission is very low, especially if you keep that 6′ social distance guideline. But also, are you going to get the virus from your dog, or driving alone in your car?
Clearly, there are some really fearful people out there taking precautions to the extreme. Also, experts have to be better about explaining proper mask use and when it’s required.
So, how long are we going to go through all this?
It looks like it’s not going to end anytime soon.
According to Trish Greenhalgh, a primary-care professor at the University of Oxford, we’re going to be wearing masks until “there are no new cases, or very few cases.”
Buckle up, kiddies, it looks like it might be a while.


clashdaily--2020-06-17--Are You Going To Shut Yo’ Mouth To Liberal Verbal Arsonists?

America is on the razor ’ s edge of moral and legal insurrection created by Antifa and other liberal anarchists .
They have used verbal arson to target millions of law-abiding Americans , who they claim are perpetrators of systemic and systematic destruction of black American life and safety .
They have drawn a line and will condemn every one of the 63 million Trump voters who are white or black and their children and grandchildren with this vicious lie .
The truth does not matter to these anarchists .
These innocent Americans are told to just “ Shut Yo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ matter .
The anarchists and their liberal make-believe media apologists want all police officers , law and order supporters , and every white Trump supporter to stand accused , be convicted , and have their Constitutional protections stripped away by millions of social media firing squads .
Truth does matter and it must be used to decimate and destroy the unabridged , unfiltered , liberal-infused toxic lies used to polarize America .
Do Not “ Shut Yo ’ Mouth !
” Here is the truth .
On May 25 , 2020 , George @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , during an arrest by Derek Chauvin , a white police officer who knelt on his neck .
White guilt was not the perpetrator and hundreds of thousands of white law enforcement officers who protect and serve did not kneel on Floyd ’ s neck .
Ask yourself , in his day , did Rev .
Martin Luther King condemn millions of white Americans for the heinous racist actions of whites in the south or the north ?
The answer is no .
He did not then and would not now .
Trending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Americans Were Misled About Mask-Use Early In The Pandemic And WHY Here is another truth .
Breonna Taylor a 26-year-old who was an essential worker providing health care during the Covid-19 pandemic earlier in the year was fatally shot by police executing a no-knock warrant in her Louisville , Kentucky on March 13 .
They were investigating two people suspected of selling drugs , neither of whom was Taylor .
The facts as known are clear .
Those officers killed an innocent woman , not the other several hundred thousand officers across America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of ethnicities and races .
It is a family created by the nation ’ s founders to establish a more perfect union .
Not a union to be vaporized by feared actions of Antifa anarchists or destroyed by incendiary race mongering rhetoric uttered by riotous criminals who rob , loot , and even murder .
They seek to contaminate America ’ s laws and cremate the nation ’ s order .
Their battle cry is , “ Shut Yo ’ Mouth !
” or be condemned !
Truth does matter .
It must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unabridged , unfiltered , liberal infused toxic lies used to daily polarize America by make-believe media and liberal Antifa activists .
The nation is at a tipping point .
Antifa anarchists want every American to believe that being born white is to serve an automatic life sentence of white guilt .
This should be contemptible to any rational person .
Yet , that is the toxic lie being perpetrated by many supporters of Black Lives Matter .
This same illogic was used in the reverse against famed slavery abolitionist Harriet Beecher Stowe , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cabin .
She was told to “ Shut Yo ’ Mouth !
” when she campaigned for the abolition of slavery !
At the time , Americans were told that blacks , slave or free , were 3/5th of a person .
What if she had listened to the lies used against enslaved and free blacks ?
Nearly a century later Rev .
Martin Luther King managed to stand up , speak out , be beaten , and go even go to jail when he led the modern civil rights movement and announced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Dream.
” He was told to “ Shut Yo ’ Mouth !
” over and over again by racist anarchists and public officials who wanted to continue to defy the U.S. Constitution .
Yet , it is the very words of Rev .
King ’ s “ I Have a Dream ” speech , “ I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media cohorts trample to the ground today .
They are not interested in color-blind justice but only in condemning innocent Americans to be deplorables , or to allow Joe Biden to label blacks as being “ Not black ” if they do not vote for him .
Rev .
King ’ s Dream of freedom from fear by knowing the truth which began in part with Harriet Beecher Stowe ’ s Uncle Tom ’ s Cabin is well documented by my co-author Susan Swift and my call-to-action book called Shut Yo ’ Mouth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Card to Silence Conservatives and How to Stop It .
It is a cutting-edge well-documented illustration of the destructive liberal practices over 150 years .
It illuminates countless election , legal , educational , entertainment , and even the many deadly riotous and murderous actions used against blacks , Christians , and their supporters by democrat anarchists .
It documents and exposes liberals ’ targeted erosion of America ’ s founding values as part of their plan to increase centralized political control by using fear and intimidation .
Well here ’ s a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Shut Yo ’ Mouth !
Be woke and stand up , America .
Draw the line and refuse to “ Shut Yo ’ Mouth !
” Injustice in the guise of ending systemic racism at the cost of freedom and law and order by riot is not justice but chaos and disorder .
Make no mistake .
This Antifa and liberal mainstream media assault is clear , distinct , and targeted at Donald J. Trump and the millions of Americans who believe that law and order is not racist .
Real law and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must be color-blind and not be ruled by rioters and liberal Antifa activists infected with the white guilt virus .
These anarchists plan to legitimize their reign of terror against democracy and a democratically elected president or his supporters by any illegitimate means .
Is the nation at a crucial tipping point toward racial destabilization ?
In a word , yes !
Do Not Shut Yo ’ Mouth and stand condemned for being white , for being Christian , for daring to be black and conservative or a supporter of peace through constitutional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Liberal anarchists have hijacked race in order to destroy Rev .
King ’ s dream and Harriet Beecher Stowe ’ s legacy of the creation of a color-blind America .
Be woke !
The call to action is clear .
July 4th is the celebration of the nation ’ s freedom from British rule .
It must not be sacrificed to the modern tyranny of the mob .
Do Not “ Shut Yo ’ Mouth !
” On July 4th America ’ s only option is to stand up and stand free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the intent and faith of our founding fathers who embraced the words that God asked in Isaiah : 6:8 : “ Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying , ‘ Whom shall I send ?
And who will go for us ?
’ And I said , ‘ Here am I .
Send me !
’ ” You are sent to not kneel to the tyranny of Antifa mobs and be silenced to “ Shut Yo ’ Mouth !
” “ There comes a time when silence is betrayal .
Our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ become silent about things that matter .
In the end , we will remember not the words of our enemies , but the silence of our friends .
Only in the darkness can you see the stars .
”

America is on the razor’s edge of moral and legal insurrection created by Antifa and other liberal anarchists. They have used verbal arson to target millions of law-abiding Americans, who they claim are perpetrators of systemic and systematic destruction of black American life and safety. They have drawn a line and will condemn every one of the 63 million Trump voters who are white or black and their children and grandchildren with this vicious lie. The truth does not matter to these anarchists. These innocent Americans are told to just “Shut Yo’Mouth!”
The truth does matter. The anarchists and their liberal make-believe media apologists want all police officers, law and order supporters, and every white Trump supporter to stand accused, be convicted, and have their Constitutional protections stripped away by millions of social media firing squads.
Truth does matter and it must be used to decimate and destroy the unabridged, unfiltered, liberal-infused toxic lies used to polarize America. Do Not “Shut Yo’ Mouth!”
Here is the truth. On May 25, 2020, George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis, Minnesota, during an arrest by Derek Chauvin, a white police officer who knelt on his neck. White guilt was not the perpetrator and hundreds of thousands of white law enforcement officers who protect and serve did not kneel on Floyd’s neck. Ask yourself, in his day, did Rev. Martin Luther King condemn millions of white Americans for the heinous racist actions of whites in the south or the north? The answer is no. He did not then and would not now.
Here is another truth. Breonna Taylor a 26-year-old who was an essential worker providing health care during the Covid-19 pandemic earlier in the year was fatally shot by police executing a no-knock warrant in her Louisville, Kentucky on March 13. They were investigating two people suspected of selling drugs, neither of whom was Taylor. The facts as known are clear. Those officers killed an innocent woman, not the other several hundred thousand officers across America.
America is not just a collection of ethnicities and races. It is a family created by the nation’s founders to establish a more perfect union. Not a union to be vaporized by feared actions of Antifa anarchists or destroyed by incendiary race mongering rhetoric uttered by riotous criminals who rob, loot, and even murder. They seek to contaminate America’s laws and cremate the nation’s order. Their battle cry is, “Shut Yo’ Mouth!” or be condemned!
Truth does matter. It must be used to decimate and destroy the unabridged, unfiltered, liberal infused toxic lies used to daily polarize America by make-believe media and liberal Antifa activists.
The nation is at a tipping point. Antifa anarchists want every American to believe that being born white is to serve an automatic life sentence of white guilt. This should be contemptible to any rational person. Yet, that is the toxic lie being perpetrated by many supporters of Black Lives Matter. This same illogic was used in the reverse against famed slavery abolitionist Harriet Beecher Stowe, author of “Uncle Tom’s Cabin. She was told to “Shut Yo’ Mouth!” when she campaigned for the abolition of slavery! At the time, Americans were told that blacks, slave or free, were 3/5th of a person. What if she had listened to the lies used against enslaved and free blacks?
Nearly a century later Rev. Martin Luther King managed to stand up, speak out, be beaten, and go even go to jail when he led the modern civil rights movement and announced to the world that “I Have a Dream.” He was told to “Shut Yo’ Mouth!” over and over again by racist anarchists and public officials who wanted to continue to defy the U.S. Constitution.
Yet, it is the very words of Rev. King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character,” that race-baiting Antifa anarchists and their mainstream media cohorts trample to the ground today. They are not interested in color-blind justice but only in condemning innocent Americans to be deplorables, or to allow Joe Biden to label blacks as being “Not black” if they do not vote for him.
Rev. King’s Dream of freedom from fear by knowing the truth which began in part with Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin is well documented by my co-author Susan Swift and my call-to-action book called Shut Yo’ Mouth! How the Left Plays the Race Card to Silence Conservatives and How to Stop It. It is a cutting-edge well-documented illustration of the destructive liberal practices over 150 years. It illuminates countless election, legal, educational, entertainment, and even the many deadly riotous and murderous actions used against blacks, Christians, and their supporters by democrat anarchists.
It documents and exposes liberals’ targeted erosion of America’s founding values as part of their plan to increase centralized political control by using fear and intimidation.
Well here’s a new “Woke Message”–Do Not Shut Yo’ Mouth!
Be woke and stand up, America. Draw the line and refuse to “Shut Yo’ Mouth!” Injustice in the guise of ending systemic racism at the cost of freedom and law and order by riot is not justice but chaos and disorder.
Make no mistake. This Antifa and liberal mainstream media assault is clear, distinct, and targeted at Donald J. Trump and the millions of Americans who believe that law and order is not racist. Real law and order supporters believe that law and order must be color-blind and not be ruled by rioters and liberal Antifa activists infected with the white guilt virus. These anarchists plan to legitimize their reign of terror against democracy and a democratically elected president or his supporters by any illegitimate means.
Is the nation at a crucial tipping point toward racial destabilization? In a word, yes! Do Not Shut Yo’ Mouth and stand condemned for being white, for being Christian, for daring to be black and conservative or a supporter of peace through constitutional justice instead of fear and riotous lawlessness.
Liberal anarchists have hijacked race in order to destroy Rev. King’s dream and Harriet Beecher Stowe’s legacy of the creation of a color-blind America.
Be woke! The call to action is clear. July 4th is the celebration of the nation’s freedom from British rule. It must not be sacrificed to the modern tyranny of the mob. Do Not “Shut Yo’ Mouth!” On July 4th America’s only option is to stand up and stand free!
Stand up and be guided by the intent and faith of our founding fathers who embraced the words that God asked in Isaiah: 6:8: “Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, ‘Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?’ And I said, ‘Here am I. Send me!’”
You are sent to not kneel to the tyranny of Antifa mobs and be silenced to “Shut Yo’ Mouth!”
Embrace Rev. King’s inspirational words:
“There comes a time when silence is betrayal. Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends. Only in the darkness can you see the stars.”


clashdaily--2020-06-17--Cancel Craziness Of The Left

Cancel Craziness Of The Left

George Orwell wrote in his book 1984 , “ The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake .
We are not interested in the good of others ; we are interested solely in power , pure power.
” No truer words could be written about the Left and the media in our culture today .
Our country has entered into a time of mind-numbing hypocrisy .
The Left and their more than willing media accomplices have decided that anyone who dares to think differently than they do has to be opposed , shamed , and , if possible , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mike Gundy .
Gundy had the audacity to be pictured wearing a One America News Network t-shirt .
CBS writer Kyle Boone first tweeted out the picture .
He added some context as well , noting that Gundy expressed that he was “ a little disappointed in all the negativity ” of the mainstream media regarding the pandemic .
He added that he found OAN “ refreshing.
” So , to be clear , Gundy wore a t-shirt and thought the news coverage of OAN was refreshing .
That ’ s what he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ picked up by OSU running back Chuba Hubbard who then tweeted , “ I will not stand for this .
This is completely insensitive to everything going on in society , and it ’ s unacceptable .
I will not be doing anything with Oklahoma State until things CHANGE.
” Trending : WATCH : Dr. Fauci Admits That Americans Were Misled About Mask-Use Early In The Pandemic And WHY Hubbard ’ s reaction is strong .
What is so offensive about OAN ?
They are a conservative news network , some of whose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Black Lives Matter movement .
I get that people will agree or disagree with OAN ’ s stance , but this is still America , right ?
It ought to be that if Coach Gundy likes OAN , he can wear the shirt .
If Chuba Hubbard doesn ’ t like it , he doesn ’ t have to wear it .
If Hubbard is in favor of BLM , then he can support that and wear shirts that support it .
That makes sense .
Not to the Left , though .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ attacks on his character filled the media .
ESPN analyst Paul Finebaum demanded OSU fire Gundy .
Sports Illustrated columnist Pat Forde provides this “ unbiased ” assessment .
“ Mike Gundy is probably not the only college football coach who watches One America News Network , the right-wing conspiracy factory that is in favor with America ’ s sitting president .
But he ’ s certainly the most proudly public about his OAN allegiance , and that tone-deaf decision is becoming increasingly problematic.
” The ridiculously biased article ends , “ Gundy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a cocksure attitude—about everything .
And now he ’ s planted himself in front of a speeding locomotive of player empowerment .
Good luck withstanding this impact , Coach Mullet.
” According to the rules of the new “ WOKE ” Left , a person has to think the right thoughts , say the right things , and oppose the right people , or s/he is in big trouble .
Am I going overboard a bit ?
I don ’ t think so .
Consider Never-Trump Rick Wilson ’ s inane attacks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2012 Kayleigh McEnaney , who is currently President Trump ’ s press secretary but at the time was just “ Kayleigh , ” tweeted on November 12 , 2012 , “ FUN FACT : @ dominos is wayyyy better than any NYC pizza ” Domino ’ s replied to McEnaney ’ s tweet , “ @ kayleighmcenany That ’ s one heck of a compliment !
Thanks for the love !
# WEAPPRECIATEIT !
” Wilson dug up these eight-year-old tweets and attempted to besmirch Domino ’ s tweeting , “ You just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The “ ETTD ” reference is to his anti-Trump book .
Domino ’ s , though , has not suffered much in the way of financial loss and won the reply battle by tweeting , “ Welp .
It ’ s unfortunate that thanking a customer for a compliment back in 2012 would be viewed as political .
Guess that ’ s 2020 for ya.
” This whole incident is ludicrous .
However , the Domino ’ s tweet is absolutely right .
“ Guess that ’ s 2020 for ya.
” Make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the media are engaged in a full attack on anyone who doesn ’ t agree with them .
Differing opinions are not only not welcomed , they are , if possible , shamed into silence .
Roger Goodell of the NFL has apologized for the league ’ s stance on respecting the American flag during the national anthem .
While I understand the debate around this issue , apparently in 2020 , no debate is allowed .
Dissenting opinions are not okay .
Catering to the demands of the extreme left goes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ colleges and universities have given in to the “ group think.
” Where does the madness end ?
No one knows for sure , but it does seem like the Woke Left and the Media are pushing the envelope further than most Americans will go .
I know of no one who wasn ’ t outraged at the death of George Floyd .
I know of no one who thinks police brutality , however rare , is okay .
I also don ’ t know very many who support defunding the police and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 2020 will be the day of reckoning .
The nature of our country will be determined in a big way that day .

George Orwell wrote in his book 1984, “The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power, pure power.” No truer words could be written about the Left and the media in our culture today.
Our country has entered into a time of mind-numbing hypocrisy. The Left and their more than willing media accomplices have decided that anyone who dares to think differently than they do has to be opposed, shamed, and, if possible, silenced. Consider Oklahoma State football coach Mike Gundy.
Gundy had the audacity to be pictured wearing a One America News Network t-shirt. CBS writer Kyle Boone first tweeted out the picture. He added some context as well, noting that Gundy expressed that he was “a little disappointed in all the negativity” of the mainstream media regarding the pandemic. He added that he found OAN “refreshing.” So, to be clear, Gundy wore a t-shirt and thought the news coverage of OAN was refreshing. That’s what he did.
Boone’s tweet was picked up by OSU running back Chuba Hubbard who then tweeted, “I will not stand for this. This is completely insensitive to everything going on in society, and it’s unacceptable. I will not be doing anything with Oklahoma State until things CHANGE.”
Hubbard’s reaction is strong. What is so offensive about OAN? They are a conservative news network, some of whose commentators have not spoken highly of the Black Lives Matter movement.
I get that people will agree or disagree with OAN’s stance, but this is still America, right? It ought to be that if Coach Gundy likes OAN, he can wear the shirt. If Chuba Hubbard doesn’t like it, he doesn’t have to wear it. If Hubbard is in favor of BLM, then he can support that and wear shirts that support it. That makes sense.
Not to the Left, though. Calls for Gundy’s firing and attacks on his character filled the media. ESPN analyst Paul Finebaum demanded OSU fire Gundy.
Sports Illustrated columnist Pat Forde provides this “unbiased” assessment. “Mike Gundy is probably not the only college football coach who watches One America News Network, the right-wing conspiracy factory that is in favor with America’s sitting president. But he’s certainly the most proudly public about his OAN allegiance, and that tone-deaf decision is becoming increasingly problematic.”
The ridiculously biased article ends, “Gundy is …a $5 million-a-year head coach with a cocksure attitude—about everything. And now he’s planted himself in front of a speeding locomotive of player empowerment. Good luck withstanding this impact, Coach Mullet.”
According to the rules of the new “WOKE” Left, a person has to think the right thoughts, say the right things, and oppose the right people, or s/he is in big trouble.
Am I going overboard a bit? I don’t think so. Consider Never-Trump Rick Wilson’s inane attacks on Domino’s Pizza.
In 2012 Kayleigh McEnaney, who is currently President Trump’s press secretary but at the time was just “Kayleigh,” tweeted on November 12, 2012, “FUN FACT: @dominos is wayyyy better than any NYC pizza”
Domino’s replied to McEnaney’s tweet, “@kayleighmcenany That’s one heck of a compliment! Thanks for the love! #WEAPPRECIATEIT!”
Wilson dug up these eight-year-old tweets and attempted to besmirch Domino’s tweeting, “You just killed your brand. #ETTD.” The “ETTD” reference is to his anti-Trump book.
Domino’s, though, has not suffered much in the way of financial loss and won the reply battle by tweeting, “Welp. It’s unfortunate that thanking a customer for a compliment back in 2012 would be viewed as political. Guess that’s 2020 for ya.”
This whole incident is ludicrous. However, the Domino’s tweet is absolutely right. “Guess that’s 2020 for ya.”
Make no mistake about it. The Left and the media are engaged in a full attack on anyone who doesn’t agree with them. Differing opinions are not only not welcomed, they are, if possible, shamed into silence.
Roger Goodell of the NFL has apologized for the league’s stance on respecting the American flag during the national anthem. While I understand the debate around this issue, apparently in 2020, no debate is allowed. Dissenting opinions are not okay.
Catering to the demands of the extreme left goes beyond the NFL. Many companies, colleges and universities have given in to the “group think.”
Where does the madness end? No one knows for sure, but it does seem like the Woke Left and the Media are pushing the envelope further than most Americans will go. I know of no one who wasn’t outraged at the death of George Floyd. I know of no one who thinks police brutality, however rare, is okay. I also don’t know very many who support defunding the police and demanding “group think.”
November 3, 2020 will be the day of reckoning. The nature of our country will be determined in a big way that day.


clashdaily--2020-06-18--Dear Christian: Your Fear Of Death Is Unbiblical

We ’ re surrounded by people so terrified of getting thrown off of social media that being unflinching in the face of death is unthinkable .
And yet that is the Christian ’ s birthright .
That ’ s right , the reason the early Church could say — in public — the very things they knew would get them flogged , imprisoned and killed in gory and creative ways was this : they were not afraid of the Adios Snooze .
They followed someone who spoke of death as ‘ sleep ’ and had himself conquered the grave .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world down through the ages threatened Christians with ‘ we ’ ll kill you ’ and the Christian answered back , ‘ yeah… and then what ?
’ Trending : WATCH : Dr. Fauci Admits That Americans Were Misled About Mask-Use Early In The Pandemic And WHY On today ’ s Warriors and Wildmen Rich and Doug dig into what it means to have a Christian perspective on the big Dirt Nap , and how that right perspective changes everything .
Prefer to stream the video ?
We ’ ve got you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ )

We’re surrounded by people so terrified of getting thrown off of social media that being unflinching in the face of death is unthinkable. And yet that is the Christian’s birthright.
That’s right, the reason the early Church could say — in public — the very things they knew would get them flogged, imprisoned and killed in gory and creative ways was this: they were not afraid of the Adios Snooze.
They followed someone who spoke of death as ‘sleep’ and had himself conquered the grave.
Echoing Jesus own words in scripture, the world down through the ages threatened Christians with ‘we’ll kill you’ and the Christian answered back, ‘yeah… and then what?’
On today’s Warriors and Wildmen Rich and Doug dig into what it means to have a Christian perspective on the big Dirt Nap, and how that right perspective changes everything.
Buckle up.
Prefer to stream the video? We’ve got you covered: Roku — FireTV — AndroidTV)


clashdaily--2020-06-18--LMAO: Fact-Checker Confirms Kente Cloths Worn By Pandering Dems Were Historically Worn By Slave Trad

LMAO: Fact-Checker Confirms Kente Cloths Worn By Pandering Dems Were Historically Worn By Slave Traders

What a failure .
Pelosi ’ s smug little pandering photo-op of taking a knee wound up on the wrong side of the racism issue .
It was bad enough that the Democrats taking a dramatic orchestrated kneeling-in-support-of-George-Flynn opportunity to kneel had it blow up in their face a few different ways .
Pelosi looked like the Medic Alert ‘ I ’ ve fallen and I can ’ t get up ’ lady .
An actual African woman called them out for being condescending and using African garb to play dress-up when it suits them , having no interest in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ co-opting for their political purposes .
( Or , to use their own weaponized language : ‘ culturally appropriating ’ . )
Trending : WATCH : Dr. Fauci Admits That Americans Were Misled About Mask-Use Early In The Pandemic And WHY Not very woke of them , is it ?
In having the Kente Cloths spotlit by her criticism of Democrat appropriation of them , people noticed a glaring point of conflict between the African garb the Democrats draped themselves in and the message they tried to send by kneeling .
Of all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ invoked , the Ashanti Tribe does not have the kind of history in a Black Lives Matters kneeling solidarity stunt .
Here ’ s why : “ Yesterday the Democrats wore kente scarfs and knelt down for their photo op .
So check this out , Kente cloth was worn by the Ashanti .
It ’ s made of silk so the affluent wore it .
The Ashanti were also known as slave owners and traders .
Huh ?
” Dave Brandon posted on Facebook June 9 .
“ This makes me wonder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tribe ’ s garb.
” — USAToday The paper then gives some historical background , some of which includes the following… Tutu , who lived from 1660 to 1712 or 1717 , unified several small Asante kingdoms to create the Asante empire .
He is credited with expanding the Asante throughout most of Ghana and introducing his subjects to the gold and slave trades along the West African coast .
The Asante supplied British and Dutch traders with slaves in exchange for firearms , which they used to expand their empire .
Slaves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states or captured during war .
Some slaves were brought across the Atlantic whiles others stayed in Africa to work in gold fields .
According to the BBC , by the end of the 18th century , the region exported an estimated 6,000-7,000 slaves per year .
— USAToday This is a party that is actively campaigning to remove Confederate statues of which 9 of the 11 are Democrats .
A party that gave us such grand historical legacies as the KKK and Jim Crowe .
Only a decade ago , they suppressed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — and Obama — featuring Louis Farrakhan until Obama was past the point where it could damage him politically .
He ’ s openly a bigot , with a penchant for calling for racial violence , and they draw support from those who follow him .
Should it really surprise us that the African culture they appropriated happens to have a history of exploiting Black people just as badly as the Democrats themselves have ?
Hey Pelosi : This Lady From Africa Has Something To Say About Your BLM Photo Op LMAO : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ After Kneeling Stunt In Congress ( VIDEO ) Pelosi Calls For Removal Of Confederate Statues But Remains Silent On Her Father ’ s Dedication Of One

[EDITOR’S NOTE: The photo used for this article includes an image of Ku Klux Klan hoods made from Kente cloths. These were a part of a collection by Paul Rucker, a multimedia artist, showing the legacy of slavery. More about the collection here.]
What a failure. Pelosi’s smug little pandering photo-op of taking a knee wound up on the wrong side of the racism issue.
It was bad enough that the Democrats taking a dramatic orchestrated kneeling-in-support-of-George-Flynn opportunity to kneel had it blow up in their face a few different ways.
Pelosi looked like the Medic Alert ‘I’ve fallen and I can’t get up’ lady.
An actual African woman called them out for being condescending and using African garb to play dress-up when it suits them, having no interest in all about whose cultural icons they are co-opting for their political purposes. (Or, to use their own weaponized language: ‘culturally appropriating’.)
Not very woke of them, is it?
In having the Kente Cloths spotlit by her criticism of Democrat appropriation of them, people noticed a glaring point of conflict between the African garb the Democrats draped themselves in and the message they tried to send by kneeling.
Of all the cultures in Africa they might have invoked, the Ashanti Tribe does not have the kind of history in a Black Lives Matters kneeling solidarity stunt. Here’s why:
“Yesterday the Democrats wore kente scarfs and knelt down for their photo op. So check this out, Kente cloth was worn by the Ashanti. It’s made of silk so the affluent wore it. The Ashanti were also known as slave owners and traders. Huh?” Dave Brandon posted on Facebook June 9. “This makes me wonder why they chose to wear this particular tribe’s garb.” — USAToday
The paper then gives some historical background, some of which includes the following…
Tutu, who lived from 1660 to 1712 or 1717, unified several small Asante kingdoms to create the Asante empire. He is credited with expanding the Asante throughout most of Ghana and introducing his subjects to the gold and slave trades along the West African coast.
The Asante supplied British and Dutch traders with slaves in exchange for firearms, which they used to expand their empire. Slaves were often acquired as tributes from smaller states or captured during war. Some slaves were brought across the Atlantic whiles others stayed in Africa to work in gold fields. According to the BBC, by the end of the 18th century, the region exported an estimated 6,000-7,000 slaves per year. — USAToday
This is a party that is actively campaigning to remove Confederate statues of which 9 of the 11 are Democrats. A party that gave us such grand historical legacies as the KKK and Jim Crowe.
Only a decade ago, they suppressed a photo of the Black Congressional Caucus — and Obama — featuring Louis Farrakhan until Obama was past the point where it could damage him politically. He’s openly a bigot, with a penchant for calling for racial violence, and they draw support from those who follow him.
Should it really surprise us that the African culture they appropriated happens to have a history of exploiting Black people just as badly as the Democrats themselves have?
Related…
Hey Pelosi: This Lady From Africa Has Something To Say About Your BLM Photo Op
LMAO: Nancy Pelosi Can’t Stand Up After Kneeling Stunt In Congress (VIDEO)
Pelosi Calls For Removal Of Confederate Statues But Remains Silent On Her Father’s Dedication Of One


clashdaily--2020-06-18--WATCH: Terry Crews Won’t Back Down On His Tweets Condemning ‘Black Supremacy’

Terry Crews thinks for himself .
That ’ s probably why he is NOT someone who gets easily pushed around by the woke brigade .
And with how he weighed in on the racial conflict we see splashed all over the news these days , it ’ s a good thing he knows his own mind .
Because they came gunning for him .
How DARE he break ranks from the BLM narrative !
He ’ s calling for *gasp* cooperation instead of conflict !
Here he is in the height of the George Floyd protests , calling for cooler @ @ @ @ @ @ @ view of tomorrow that Rev .
Dr. MLK would have recognized : Equality .
Equality doesn ’ t seem to be high on the list of some activist priorities these days .
Retribution seems to rank a lot higher… and the two are NOT compatible .
Notice he invoked “ all in this together.
” The left liked the sound of that so much better when it was the cudgel they used to keep us hiding from a virus , didn ’ t they ?
Rather than trying to figure out what he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ went straight for the fingerpointing .
They had missed the point entirely .
He wasn ’ t even talking about what any individual white guy was doing .
He was talking about black people who presumed to ‘ revoke ’ his identity for the sin of having ‘ heretical ’ ideas .
Even his ‘ black people first ’ is entirely reasonable in the way he presents it , because it is not being pitted against another , scapegoated group .
He ’ s challenging his own peers to bring their own intellect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ themselves in , rather than parroting someone else ’ s talking points .
That is a fantastic first step toward finding real solutions .
And if what he said about equality , and his rejection of ‘ black supremacy ’ offends you ?
He ’ s not backing down .
Here is what he has to say about it .
If more people saw life the way he did , we ’ d be making progress on finding lasting solutions , instead of burning down the neighborhoods of the very people they claim @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bold stand that flies in the face of popular opinion ?
Terry Crews is in good company .
There was another guy known for doing the same thing .
Our own Doug Giles covers it in his newest book : Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to paint Jesus as a non-offensive bearded woman who endorses their agenda .
This book blows that nonsense all to hell .
From the stonking laptop of bestselling author , Doug Giles , comes a new book that focuses on Jesus ’ overt masculine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It ’ s informative , bold , hilarious , and scary .
Giles has concluded , after many years of scouring the scripture that , If Masculinity Is ‘ Toxic ’ , Call Jesus Radioactive .

Terry Crews thinks for himself. That’s probably why he is NOT someone who gets easily pushed around by the woke brigade.
And with how he weighed in on the racial conflict we see splashed all over the news these days, it’s a good thing he knows his own mind. Because they came gunning for him.
How DARE he break ranks from the BLM narrative! He’s calling for *gasp* cooperation instead of conflict!
Here he is in the height of the George Floyd protests, calling for cooler heads to prevail. He has a view of tomorrow that Rev. Dr. MLK would have recognized: Equality.
Defeating White supremacy without White people creates Black supremacy. Equality is the truth. Like it or not, we are all in this together. — terry crews (@terrycrews) June 7, 2020
Equality doesn’t seem to be high on the list of some activist priorities these days. Retribution seems to rank a lot higher… and the two are NOT compatible.
Notice he invoked “all in this together.” The left liked the sound of that so much better when it was the cudgel they used to keep us hiding from a virus, didn’t they?
Rather than trying to figure out what he might mean by that, his critics went straight for the fingerpointing.
I agree. I'm not discussing white people here. there are "gatekeepers of Blackness" within our own community who decide who's Black and who's not. I have often been called out for not being "black enough". How can that be? https://t.co/Tt9Og866x6 — terry crews (@terrycrews) June 8, 2020
They had missed the point entirely. He wasn’t even talking about what any individual white guy was doing. He was talking about black people who presumed to ‘revoke’ his identity for the sin of having ‘heretical’ ideas.
Any Black person who calls me a coon or and Uncle Tom for promoting EQUALITY is a Black Supremist, because they have determined who's Black and who is not. — terry crews (@terrycrews) June 8, 2020
Even his ‘black people first’ is entirely reasonable in the way he presents it, because it is not being pitted against another, scapegoated group.
He’s challenging his own peers to bring their own intellect to bear on the situation they find themselves in, rather than parroting someone else’s talking points. That is a fantastic first step toward finding real solutions.
I believe it is important we not suffer from groupthink, and we keep minds of our own, and be allowed to ask difficult questions to each other. I believe this dialogue is important as we get through this trauma together. I love you. — terry crews (@terrycrews) June 8, 2020
And if what he said about equality, and his rejection of ‘black supremacy’ offends you? He’s not backing down. Here is what he has to say about it.
Terry Crews Doesn’t Regret ‘Black supremacy’ Tweet; Wants ‘dialogue to come out’ This Tuesday on “The Talk@Home,” Terry Crews discusses backlash he’s received over a Twitter post in which he said, “Defeating White supremacy without White people creates Black supremacy. Equality is the truth.” Posted by The Talk on Tuesday, June 16, 2020
Solid stuff.
If more people saw life the way he did, we’d be making progress on finding lasting solutions, instead of burning down the neighborhoods of the very people they claim to be fighting for.
Taking a bold stand that flies in the face of popular opinion?
Terry Crews is in good company. There was another guy known for doing the same thing.
Our own Doug Giles covers it in his newest book:
Much of the Left loathes masculinity and they love to paint Jesus as a non-offensive bearded woman who endorses their agenda. This book blows that nonsense all to hell. From the stonking laptop of bestselling author, Doug Giles, comes a new book that focuses on Jesus’ overt masculine traits like no other books have heretofore. It’s informative, bold, hilarious, and scary. Giles has concluded, after many years of scouring the scripture that, If Masculinity Is ‘Toxic’, Call Jesus Radioactive.


clashdaily--2020-06-18--WTF? Tim Kaine Says That The United States Created Slavery (VIDEO)

You think Biden is bad ?
This idiot was in line to be Hillary ’ s Veep .
Now he ’ s just the former future Vice President .
It really is a good thing he didn ’ t get the job .
With racial tensions getting fanned to fever pitch , can you imagine how badly this idiot could have mishandled the situation ?
Tim doesn ’ t have Clue One about the basics of American history , and he seems Hellbent on making sure the world knows it .
Here he is waxing philosophical on the problem and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the debunked thesis of the New York Times ’ s historically malfeasant ( but Pulitzer Prize-winning ) 1619 project and runs with it .
Because he ’ s a good little idealogue , never missing a chance to push his preferred narrative .
Trending : WATCH : Dr. Fauci Admits That Americans Were Misled About Mask-Use Early In The Pandemic And WHY This time , he painted a grim picture of what the casual listener would conclude was America ’ s leading role in defining the slavery of the day .
Slaves were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and then brought here , were we created a system of laws governing slavery .
That was 1619 , the key thesis of the New York Times ’ latest America-Is-Bad campaign .
What ’ s wrong with that assertion ?
Quite a bit .
A quick glance at this timeline reminds us that slavery is by no means a recent complication of the human condition .
Anyone familiar with history will know that the Caesars of ancient Rome filled their coffers with the proceeds of captured slaves , or that Aesop , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was held as a slave ?
Or that the children of European Christians were taken , raised by Muslims , forced to convert and trained to fight as fanatical soldiers , often against other Christian nations ?
We might also note that the famous song ‘ let my people go ’ was about ANOTHER group of historical slaves several thousands of years earlier .
In other words , slavery is hardly a new practice .
China has had some form of slavery throughout almost all of its history .
But what about THAT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1619 , the White Lion , an English privateer commanded by John Jope , sailed into Point Comfort and dropped anchor in the James River .
Virginia colonist John Rolfe documented the arrival of the ship and “ 20 and odd ” Africans on board .
( … ) It is believed the first Africans brought to the colony of Virginia , 400 years ago this month , were Kimbundu-speaking peoples from the kingdom of Ndongo , located in part of present-day Angola .
Slave traders forced the captives to march several hundred @ @ @ @ @ @ @ San Juan Bautista , one of at least 36 transatlantic Portuguese and Spanish slave ships .
The ship embarked with about 350 Africans on board , but hunger and disease took a swift toll .
En route , about 150 captives died .
Then , when the San Juan Bautista approached what is now Veracruz , Mexico in the summer of 1619 , it encountered two ships , the White Lion and another English privateer , the Treasurer .
The crews stormed the vulnerable slave ship and seized 50 to 60 of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sailed for Virginia .
—History What do we see here ?
We see that English Privateers ( lawful Pirates operating with the blessing of one country ’ s Crown ) attacked the San Juan Bautista .
As is the case with Privateers , the winner gets to keep the cargo of the captured ship .
But the cargo here was slaves .
This means there were ALREADY slaves in the New World .
In August 1518 , more than 100 years before the White Lion captured the San Juan Baptista , Spain had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Western Africa to the New World .
Obviously , slave trading was already practiced by this point .
European slave ships had been acquiring slaves from slave traders in Africa .
So we already see a few lies in Tim ’ s story .
The crew of the White Lion did not pluck unsuspecting men out their beds in some kind of a midnight raid so they could be sold for profit .
The crew of the White Lion probably had no idea what cargo , if any , they were going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or tobacco were just as likely , and probably just as profitable .
The English colony didn ’ t CREATE slavery , they found themselves grappling with a practice that was already established both in the Old World and in some of the Colonies .
These men arrived with a status of slaves and Europeans who were already steeped in a class system were called upon to make a ruling about what to do with such men .
Sure , a more ‘ enlightened ’ mind or time would have called for their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have changed history , but by no means did they invent new laws , they just did what Democrats themselves tell us to do today… they follow the trendline set by other world leaders .
These men were viewed as ‘ property ’ .
Slavery was already in practice in various places around the world , they made a decision in line with what , in other circumstances , Leftist would insist was ‘ standard practice ’ around the world .
If Tim were honest , he wouldn ’ t skip ahead 400 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s role in slavery , Succession , the KKK and Jim Crowe .
But of course his goal was not to make DEMOCRATS look bad , just America .
Here ’ s some of the social media blowback he ’ s getting…

You think Biden is bad? This idiot was in line to be Hillary’s Veep. Now he’s just the former future Vice President.
It really is a good thing he didn’t get the job. With racial tensions getting fanned to fever pitch, can you imagine how badly this idiot could have mishandled the situation?
Tim doesn’t have Clue One about the basics of American history, and he seems Hellbent on making sure the world knows it. Here he is waxing philosophical on the problem and origin of slavery.
He picks up the debunked thesis of the New York Times’s historically malfeasant (but Pulitzer Prize-winning) 1619 project and runs with it. Because he’s a good little idealogue, never missing a chance to push his preferred narrative.
This time, he painted a grim picture of what the casual listener would conclude was America’s leading role in defining the slavery of the day.
Sen. Tim Kaine: "The United States didn't inherit slavery from anybody. We created it." pic.twitter.com/VM86sRrtn1 — The Hill (@thehill) June 16, 2020
Slaves were captured against their will, he says, and then brought here, were we created a system of laws governing slavery. That was 1619, the key thesis of the New York Times’ latest America-Is-Bad campaign.
What’s wrong with that assertion? Quite a bit. A quick glance at this timeline reminds us that slavery is by no means a recent complication of the human condition.
Anyone familiar with history will know that the Caesars of ancient Rome filled their coffers with the proceeds of captured slaves, or that Aesop, of Aesop’s Fables fame, was held as a slave? Or that the children of European Christians were taken, raised by Muslims, forced to convert and trained to fight as fanatical soldiers, often against other Christian nations? We might also note that the famous song ‘let my people go’ was about ANOTHER group of historical slaves several thousands of years earlier.
In other words, slavery is hardly a new practice. China has had some form of slavery throughout almost all of its history.
But what about THAT incident in 1619?
In late August 1619, the White Lion, an English privateer commanded by John Jope, sailed into Point Comfort and dropped anchor in the James River. Virginia colonist John Rolfe documented the arrival of the ship and “20 and odd” Africans on board. (…) It is believed the first Africans brought to the colony of Virginia, 400 years ago this month, were Kimbundu-speaking peoples from the kingdom of Ndongo, located in part of present-day Angola. Slave traders forced the captives to march several hundred miles to the coast to board the San Juan Bautista, one of at least 36 transatlantic Portuguese and Spanish slave ships. The ship embarked with about 350 Africans on board, but hunger and disease took a swift toll. En route, about 150 captives died. Then, when the San Juan Bautista approached what is now Veracruz, Mexico in the summer of 1619, it encountered two ships, the White Lion and another English privateer, the Treasurer. The crews stormed the vulnerable slave ship and seized 50 to 60 of the remaining Africans. After, the pair sailed for Virginia. —History
What do we see here?
We see that English Privateers (lawful Pirates operating with the blessing of one country’s Crown) attacked the San Juan Bautista. As is the case with Privateers, the winner gets to keep the cargo of the captured ship. But the cargo here was slaves.
This means there were ALREADY slaves in the New World.
In August 1518, more than 100 years before the White Lion captured the San Juan Baptista, Spain had already authorized slaves to be traded directly from Western Africa to the New World. Obviously, slave trading was already practiced by this point. European slave ships had been acquiring slaves from slave traders in Africa.
So we already see a few lies in Tim’s story.
The crew of the White Lion did not pluck unsuspecting men out their beds in some kind of a midnight raid so they could be sold for profit. The crew of the White Lion probably had no idea what cargo, if any, they were going to seize with the ship. Sugar or tobacco were just as likely, and probably just as profitable.
The English colony didn’t CREATE slavery, they found themselves grappling with a practice that was already established both in the Old World and in some of the Colonies. These men arrived with a status of slaves and Europeans who were already steeped in a class system were called upon to make a ruling about what to do with such men.
Sure, a more ‘enlightened’ mind or time would have called for their freedom, and such a decision would have changed history, but by no means did they invent new laws, they just did what Democrats themselves tell us to do today… they follow the trendline set by other world leaders.
These men were viewed as ‘property’. Slavery was already in practice in various places around the world, they made a decision in line with what, in other circumstances, Leftist would insist was ‘standard practice’ around the world.
If Tim were honest…
If Tim were honest, he wouldn’t skip ahead 400 years without acknowledging his own party’s role in slavery, Succession, the KKK and Jim Crowe. But of course his goal was not to make DEMOCRATS look bad, just America.
Here’s some of the social media blowback he’s getting…


clashdaily--2020-06-18--BLUE FLU: Mass Walkouts After Atlanta Cop Gets Charged With Felony Murder

Helluva time to be a cop , isn ’ t it ?
It was never an easy job to begin with .
They already deal with PTSD from the things they see on the job .
They face the parts of society most of the rest of us would rather try to forget about .
The grisled body at a traffic accident or murder scene , the drug-addled domestic violence case .
The girl who should be in 8th grade selling herself on the street .
They do it all for bad pay , worse hours , going out in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are often hated by the people they are trying to help , and even victims of crime are frequently unwilling to help them put the bad guy away .
Trending : WATCH : Dr. Fauci Admits That Americans Were Misled About Mask-Use Early In The Pandemic And WHY Complicate that with a soft-on-crime revolving door judicial system where the guys they arrest are back on the street within hours , or sketchy lawyers have the bad guys walking while three-star generals get the book thrown at them , and its a wonder that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BEFORE activists , politicians , professors , and journalists decided to make cops society ’ s scapegoat .
Before a wildly skewed and exaggerated picture of the ‘ sins ’ of the cops and the ‘ virtue ’ of the people they tangle with became a national narrative , parroted by a generation .
Now , in Atlanta , a cop who shot a suspect who had assaulted him , stolen a weapon , discharged it at an officer and fled while being calmly asked to put his hands behind his back for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ murder charges , which could include a death penalty .
It wasn ’ t bad enough that he was fired before there was any time for a review .
The cop who was assaulted during a routine arrest could be facing the death penalty because of how events played out .
Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard announced Wednesday that former Atlanta police officers Garrett Rolfe and Devin Brosnan are being charged in the fatal shooting of Rayshard Brooks .
Rolfe faces 11 charges , including felony murder , for allegedly shooting Brooks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carries the possibility of life without parole or the death penalty , Howard said .
Brosnan faces several charges , including aggravated assault .
Rolfe was fired after the incident , while Brosnan was placed on administrative leave , according to the Associated Press .
Howard said Brosnan is cooperating with prosecutors .
Howard announced that his office reviewed eight separate video recordings of the incident and also spoke with several witnesses before coming to its decision .
“ Mr .
Brooks did not display any aggressive behavior during the 17 minutes and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the presser .
“ Mr .
Brooks was running away at the time the shot was fired.
” — Yahoo Did you catch that part , where the AG said ‘ Mr .
Brooks did not display any aggressive behavior ’ ?
Have you SEEN the video ?
Brooks was fending off two cops during an arrest .
Wrestled to the ground .
Was warned 3 times before being tased .
TOOK the weapon out of the cop ’ s hand .
Apparently DISCHARGED that weapon at the cop while fleeing… and yet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Felony murder , so you know , involves killing someone during the act of committing a crime .
Police have the lawful authority to subdue someone who is resisting arrest , and the video speaks for itself .
So what ‘ other crime ’ were the cops in the process of committing when Brooks was shot ?
Which of these serious crimes does the AG really allege the police were involved in ?
Kidnapping ?
Burglary ?
Arson ?
( a ) A person commits the offense of murder when he unlawfully and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ implied , causes the death of another human being .
( b ) Express malice is that deliberate intention unlawfully to take the life of another human being which is manifested by external circumstances capable of proof .
Malice shall be implied where no considerable provocation appears and where all the circumstances of the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart .
( c ) A person also commits the offense of murder when , in the commission of a felony , he causes the death of another human being irrespective of malice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the offense of murder shall be punished by death , by imprisonment for life without parole , or by imprisonment for life .
Have you heard ANYONE reporting on the cop ’ s explanation for what happened in that fateful moment ?
Atlanta police , not surprisingly , have revolted at the news .
Just showing up for work is dangerous enough .
But when the legal system itself is looking to satisfy the mob , cops have a target on their back .
Police are not risk-adverse people .
But taking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that officials are waiting for a chance to destroy you not just personally and professionally , but to criminalize you as well at a time where it is politically advantageous to publicly flog law enforcement ?
You can not do that for long without consequences .
These are the same people who cleared away the rioters in Atlanta from the front doors of CNN… CNN , who is among the first to paint police as corrupt , violent , and murderous .
Officially , Atlanta police have enough personnel to respond to calls @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than usual absentee level .
That doesn ’ t exactly square with this : Others have noticed there are LONG periods of radio silence on the scanner .
We ’ re no experts on the topic , but that seems like it might be unusual for a city of Atlanta ’ s size .
Anarchists have wanted to destabilize our urban centers to create unrest .
Our politicians have been only too happy to comply , by routinely demonizing the one group who stands between order and chaos .
‘ Important ’ people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been only too happy to pile on the ‘ evil ’ police .
What happens to that sense of security when the only deterrent keeping the ‘ eat the rich ’ mobs that tore through downtown New York at bay decide that putting their necks on the line in the big city is no longer worth the risk ?
Who will they turn to if a mob tears down the gates to their gated community with designs to loot whatever they can carry , and destroy whatever they can not ?
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ’ s been demonized over the years .
What happens if the Atlanta mob comes back to CNN , who so gladly demonizes the police as knuckle-dragging racists ?
They managed NOT to face the fate of Minneapolis , New York and Seattle THEN , but what about now ?
Who would they call ?
The Leftists who played their little games encouraging anarchist elements within their movement are beginning to see JUST what kind of hell they could unleash in the process .
If you wonder what that might look like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Purge — or the news .

Helluva time to be a cop, isn’t it?
It was never an easy job to begin with. They already deal with PTSD from the things they see on the job. They face the parts of society most of the rest of us would rather try to forget about.
The grisled body at a traffic accident or murder scene, the drug-addled domestic violence case. The girl who should be in 8th grade selling herself on the street.
They do it all for bad pay, worse hours, going out in the worst of weather conditions. They are often hated by the people they are trying to help, and even victims of crime are frequently unwilling to help them put the bad guy away.
Complicate that with a soft-on-crime revolving door judicial system where the guys they arrest are back on the street within hours, or sketchy lawyers have the bad guys walking while three-star generals get the book thrown at them, and its a wonder that anyone wants that job.
That was BEFORE activists, politicians, professors, and journalists decided to make cops society’s scapegoat. Before a wildly skewed and exaggerated picture of the ‘sins’ of the cops and the ‘virtue’ of the people they tangle with became a national narrative, parroted by a generation.
Now, in Atlanta, a cop who shot a suspect who had assaulted him, stolen a weapon, discharged it at an officer and fled while being calmly asked to put his hands behind his back for an arrest faces felony — FELONY — murder charges, which could include a death penalty.
It wasn’t bad enough that he was fired before there was any time for a review. The cop who was assaulted during a routine arrest could be facing the death penalty because of how events played out.
Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard announced Wednesday that former Atlanta police officers Garrett Rolfe and Devin Brosnan are being charged in the fatal shooting of Rayshard Brooks. Rolfe faces 11 charges, including felony murder, for allegedly shooting Brooks in the back. The murder charge carries the possibility of life without parole or the death penalty, Howard said. Brosnan faces several charges, including aggravated assault. Rolfe was fired after the incident, while Brosnan was placed on administrative leave, according to the Associated Press. Howard said Brosnan is cooperating with prosecutors. Howard announced that his office reviewed eight separate video recordings of the incident and also spoke with several witnesses before coming to its decision. “Mr. Brooks did not display any aggressive behavior during the 17 minutes and 42 seconds,” Howard said during the presser. “Mr. Brooks was running away at the time the shot was fired.” — Yahoo
Did you catch that part, where the AG said ‘Mr. Brooks did not display any aggressive behavior’? Have you SEEN the video? Brooks was fending off two cops during an arrest. Wrestled to the ground. Was warned 3 times before being tased. TOOK the weapon out of the cop’s hand. Apparently DISCHARGED that weapon at the cop while fleeing… and yet Brooks somehow took NO aggressive behavior?
Felony murder, so you know, involves killing someone during the act of committing a crime. Police have the lawful authority to subdue someone who is resisting arrest, and the video speaks for itself. So what ‘other crime’ were the cops in the process of committing when Brooks was shot?
Felony murder is a legal statute that expands the definition of murder. It occurs when someone commits a serious or inherently dangerous felony, and someone else dies during the course of committing or attempting to commit the felony. Felonies that are inherently dangerous include burglary, arson, rape, kidnapping, aggravated assault and cruelty to children. The Court has also extended the definition to include crimes such as possession of a weapon on school property and robbery. — Georgia Criminal Lawyer
Which of these serious crimes does the AG really allege the police were involved in? Kidnapping? Burglary? Arson?
Felony Murder in Georgia
(a) A person commits the offense of murder when he unlawfully and with malice aforethought, either express or implied, causes the death of another human being. (b) Express malice is that deliberate intention unlawfully to take the life of another human being which is manifested by external circumstances capable of proof. Malice shall be implied where no considerable provocation appears and where all the circumstances of the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart. (c) A person also commits the offense of murder when, in the commission of a felony, he causes the death of another human being irrespective of malice. (d) A person convicted of the offense of murder shall be punished by death, by imprisonment for life without parole, or by imprisonment for life.
Have you heard ANYONE reporting on the cop’s explanation for what happened in that fateful moment?
A law firm representing Rolfe said he reacted after he thought he “heard a gunshot and saw a flash in front of him.” “Fearing for his safety, and the safety of the civilians around him, Officer Rolfe dropped his taser and fired his service weapon at the only portion of Mr. Brooks that presented to him — Mr. Brooks’ back,” a statement released by the LoRusso Law Firm says. Attorneys for Rolfe said their client immediately called for emergency medical services and began rendering aid to Brooks. Devin Brosnan, the other officer at the shooting, faces an aggravated assault charge for standing on Brooks in the parking lot. [emphasis added] — ABC
Atlanta police, not surprisingly, have revolted at the news. Just showing up for work is dangerous enough. But when the legal system itself is looking to satisfy the mob, cops have a target on their back.
Police are not risk-adverse people. But taking abuse from all directions only to know that officials are waiting for a chance to destroy you not just personally and professionally, but to criminalize you as well at a time where it is politically advantageous to publicly flog law enforcement?
You cannot do that for long without consequences. These are the same people who cleared away the rioters in Atlanta from the front doors of CNN… CNN, who is among the first to paint police as corrupt, violent, and murderous.
Officially, Atlanta police have enough personnel to respond to calls. But they did acknowledge a higher than usual absentee level. That doesn’t exactly square with this:
Atlanta: Police Department says walkouts are untrue. Mayor @KeishaBottoms talking about the walkout on CNN right now.
Reports suggest APD reached out to Gwinnett Cobb, and Clayton for help tonight and they all said no. @CBS46 https://t.co/J44Ym54TLq — shon gables cbs46 (@shongables) June 18, 2020
Others have noticed there are LONG periods of radio silence on the scanner. We’re no experts on the topic, but that seems like it might be unusual for a city of Atlanta’s size.
Here is the police scanner for Atlanta Police Dispatch – Zone 6 East. Listen and let me know what you hear…..https://t.co/k7vXuTYs7h — Blue Flu Cernovich (@Cernovich) June 18, 2020
Shapiro makes an excellent point:
Anarchists have wanted to destabilize our urban centers to create unrest. Our politicians have been only too happy to comply, by routinely demonizing the one group who stands between order and chaos.
‘Important’ people with their powerful jobs and safe neighborhoods have been only too happy to pile on the ‘evil’ police. What happens to that sense of security when the only deterrent keeping the ‘eat the rich’ mobs that tore through downtown New York at bay decide that putting their necks on the line in the big city is no longer worth the risk?
Who will they turn to if a mob tears down the gates to their gated community with designs to loot whatever they can carry, and destroy whatever they cannot? The police aren’t the ONLY group that’s been demonized over the years.
What happens if the Atlanta mob comes back to CNN, who so gladly demonizes the police as knuckle-dragging racists? They managed NOT to face the fate of Minneapolis, New York and Seattle THEN, but what about now? Who would they call?
The Leftists who played their little games encouraging anarchist elements within their movement are beginning to see JUST what kind of hell they could unleash in the process.
If you wonder what that might look like you could watch the trailer for The Purge — or the news.