activistpost--2020-12-18--Nurse Collapses on Television Minutes After Receiving Covid Vaccine

America ’ s frontline workers are now receiving the Covid vaccine .
It was reported that two health care workers who received the experimental Covid shot in Alaska experienced severe adverse events minutes after taking it .
Both were admitted to the ER and one was transferred to the ICU after experiencing severe adverse events , both are expected to survive .
One of the health care workers had not history of allergies .
This is similar to two health care workers who also experienced adverse events in the UK after receiving the experimental shot , prompting the government to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children and people who have clergies to medicine , vaccines or food avoid the shot for now .
Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Today , health care workers at Memorial Hospital located in Chattanooga , Tennessee received the vaccine ; and about 10 minutes later , a nurse who reviewed the vaccine passed out on TV .
The local media reported that the nurse did regain consciousness and appeared to be OK , which is a good thing .
But remember , this is an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ approval from government regulators .
The Pfizer vaccine has only received EUA ( Emergency Use Authorization ) and the trials are still ongoing .
So , that makes this an experimental vaccine in my book and the public appear to be the guinea pigs .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Spiro Skouras
America’s frontline workers are now receiving the Covid vaccine. It was reported that two health care workers who received the experimental Covid shot in Alaska experienced severe adverse events minutes after taking it.
Both were admitted to the ER and one was transferred to the ICU after experiencing severe adverse events, both are expected to survive. One of the health care workers had not history of allergies.
This is similar to two health care workers who also experienced adverse events in the UK after receiving the experimental shot, prompting the government to issue a warning that pregnant women, children and people who have allergies to medicine, vaccines or food avoid the shot for now.
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
Today, health care workers at Memorial Hospital located in Chattanooga, Tennessee received the vaccine; and about 10 minutes later, a nurse who reviewed the vaccine passed out on TV.
The local media reported that the nurse did regain consciousness and appeared to be OK, which is a good thing.
But remember, this is an experimental vaccine that has not received official approval from government regulators. The Pfizer vaccine has only received EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) and the trials are still ongoing. So, that makes this an experimental vaccine in my book and the public appear to be the guinea pigs.
BitChute Backup
?
2 Alaska Health Workers Got Emergency Treatment After Receiving Pfizer’s Vaccine
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/16/health/covid-pfizer-vaccine-allergic-reaction.html
2 UK healthcare workers experience severe allergic reactions from COVID vaccine
https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/2-uk-healthcare-workers-experience-severe-allergic-reactions-from-covid-vaccine
CHI Memorial Vaccinates Front Line Workers
https://www.wrcbtv.com/clip/15168660/chi-memorial-vaccinates-front-line-workers
Follow Spiro on BitChute bitchute.com/channel/spiro/ Follow on Twitter https://twitter.com/o_rips
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-18--Media Blackout: Moderna’s FDA Report Lists 13 Deaths in Vaccine Trials — 6 in Vaccine Group, 7 in Pl

Media Blackout: Moderna’s FDA Report Lists 13 Deaths in Vaccine Trials — 6 in Vaccine Group, 7 in Placebo

The Pfizer Covid vaccine is already being administered to the public in the UK , and the first doses have been given in the US ahead of a mass vaccination campaign on a global scale .
It is important to recognize that the Pfizer Covid vaccine has not been approved by the FDA .
It has only received Emergency Use Authorization ( EUA ) , meaning the vaccine has not gone through the standard process to get official approval from the regulatory agency .
Now Moderna ’ s experimental Covid vaccine is set to get the same Emergency Use Authorization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to millions of people .
Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
We have already witnessed short-term adverse events ( side effects ) from the Pfizer vaccine .
Truth is , nobody knows what the long-term effects could be and it appears the public is being subjected to an experiment on a global scale .
In this report , we examine discrepancies in the FDA Moderna report that was voted on by an advisory panel .
The panel voted 20-0 recommending EUA .
Some of the discrepancies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the desired results to gain EUA , as well as 13 total deaths in the trials – 6 in the vaccinated group and 7 in the placebo .
Something the media refuses to address .
Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated : The Study The CDC Refused To Do — Interview with Dr. Weiler https : //www.activistpost.com/2020/12/vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-the-study-the-cdc-refused-to-do-interview-with-dr-weiler.html You can ’ t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects .
The government likely won ’ t compensate you for damages either https : //www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html Pfizer ’ s CEO hasn ’ t gotten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doesn ’ t want to cut in line https : //www.cnbc.com/2020/12/14/pfizers-ceo-hasnt-gotten-his-covid-vaccine-yet-saying-he-doesnt-want-to-cut-in-line.html More than half in FDNY say they ’ ll refuse COVID-19 vaccine https : //nypost.com/2020/12/05/these-nyc-first-responders-fear-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects/ “ Who Wants To Be A Guinea Pig ?
” : Health Workers Balk At Vaccine ; 40 % Of Staff At One Chicago Hospital Refuse To Take https : //www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/who-wants-be-guinea-pig-health-workers-balk-vaccine-40-staff-one-chicago-hospital-refuse In Germany , a Better Vaccine for Politicians ?
http : //content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1932366,00.html Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Spiro Skouras
The Pfizer Covid vaccine is already being administered to the public in the UK, and the first doses have been given in the US ahead of a mass vaccination campaign on a global scale.
It is important to recognize that the Pfizer Covid vaccine has not been approved by the FDA. It has only received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), meaning the vaccine has not gone through the standard process to get official approval from the regulatory agency.
Now Moderna’s experimental Covid vaccine is set to get the same Emergency Use Authorization, allowing the shot to be distributed to millions of people.
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
We have already witnessed short-term adverse events (side effects) from the Pfizer vaccine. Truth is, nobody knows what the long-term effects could be and it appears the public is being subjected to an experiment on a global scale.
In this report, we examine discrepancies in the FDA Moderna report that was voted on by an advisory panel. The panel voted 20-0 recommending EUA.
Some of the discrepancies include cherry picked trial participants to achieve the desired results to gain EUA, as well as 13 total deaths in the trials – 6 in the vaccinated group and 7 in the placebo. Something the media refuses to address.
BitChute Backup
?
Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated: The Study The CDC Refused To Do — Interview with Dr. Weiler
https://www.activistpost.com/2020/12/vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-the-study-the-cdc-refused-to-do-interview-with-dr-weiler.html
HHS Secretary: FDA expected to greenlight Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine
https://6abc.com/moderna-covid-vaccine-fda-emergency-use-authorization-when-will-the-us-approvel-modernas-coronavirus-shot/8867430/
2nd COVID Vaccine: FDA Panel Recommends Moderna Vaccine For Emergency Use
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2020/12/17/2nd-covid-vaccine-fda-emergency-use/
FDA Moderna Paper
https://www.fda.gov/media/144452/download
You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects. The government likely won’t compensate you for damages either
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
Pfizer’s CEO hasn’t gotten his Covid vaccine yet, saying he doesn’t want to cut in line
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/14/pfizers-ceo-hasnt-gotten-his-covid-vaccine-yet-saying-he-doesnt-want-to-cut-in-line.html
More than half in FDNY say they’ll refuse COVID-19 vaccine
https://nypost.com/2020/12/05/these-nyc-first-responders-fear-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects/
2 Alaska Health Workers Got Emergency Treatment After Receiving Pfizer’s Vaccine
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/16/health/covid-pfizer-vaccine-allergic-reaction.html
2 UK healthcare workers experience severe allergic reactions from COVID vaccine
https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/2-uk-healthcare-workers-experience-severe-allergic-reactions-from-covid-vaccine
“Who Wants To Be A Guinea Pig?”: Health Workers Balk At Vaccine; 40% Of Staff At One Chicago Hospital Refuse To Take
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/who-wants-be-guinea-pig-health-workers-balk-vaccine-40-staff-one-chicago-hospital-refuse
In Germany, a Better Vaccine for Politicians?
http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1932366,00.html
Follow Spiro on BitChute bitchute.com/channel/spiro/ Follow on Twitter https://twitter.com/o_rips
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-18--Former Goldman CFO Calls For Universal Basic Income “To Stave Off Revolution”

Former Goldman Sachs CFO Marty Chavez thinks that income redistribution via Universal Basic Income ( UBI ) is the only way to stave off revolution as the wealth gap continues to increase .
In an interview with The Business of Business , host Gregory Ugwi asked Chavez if he agrees with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ( D-NY ) , who says “ there should be no billionaires in the US as long as there are poor families , ” adding that venture capitalist Paul Graham says that income inequality is a “ natural part of capitalism , and a sign that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Democrat donor ( most recently Pete Buttigieg ’ s presidential bid ) , agreed that the income gap is a consequence of capitalism , but said “ at the same time , it isn ’ t an inevitable feature of capitalism that the inequality be as extreme as it ’ s getting .
There have been long periods in American history where there was always inequality – but it wasn ’ t this kind of inequality.
” He also isn ’ t a fan of AOC , saying “ I am not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all .
I didn ’ t vote for her , I wouldn ’ t vote for her .
I hear her , and she ’ s just not saying anything that makes any sense to me.
” At the same time , I ’ m a big proponent of a universal basic income .
My personal view is that if you ’ re just being pragmatic and looking at inequality – and not thinking about some abstract concept of justice – you don ’ t want the inequality to be so extreme that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ought to be prepared to pay to decrease that probability .
This is what I say to , you know , friends who you might call ‘ oligarchs , ’ right ?
Why it would make sense for everybody to have some baseline income and why we should all pay for it .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Tyler Durden
Former Goldman Sachs CFO Marty Chavez thinks that income redistribution via Universal Basic Income (UBI) is the only way to stave off revolution as the wealth gap continues to increase.
In an interview with The Business of Business, host Gregory Ugwi asked Chavez if he agrees with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who says “there should be no billionaires in the US as long as there are poor families,” adding that venture capitalist Paul Graham says that income inequality is a “natural part of capitalism, and a sign that the process is working.”
Chavez, a Democrat donor (most recently Pete Buttigieg’s presidential bid), agreed that the income gap is a consequence of capitalism, but said “at the same time, it isn’t an inevitable feature of capitalism that the inequality be as extreme as it’s getting. There have been long periods in American history where there was always inequality – but it wasn’t this kind of inequality.”
He also isn’t a fan of AOC, saying “I am not in AOC’s camp – at all. I didn’t vote for her, I wouldn’t vote for her. I hear her, and she’s just not saying anything that makes any sense to me.”
At the same time, I’m a big proponent of a universal basic income. My personal view is that if you’re just being pragmatic and looking at inequality – and not thinking about some abstract concept of justice – you don’t want the inequality to be so extreme that it leads to revolution. So you ought to be prepared to pay to decrease that probability. This is what I say to, you know, friends who you might call ‘oligarchs,’ right? Why it would make sense for everybody to have some baseline income and why we should all pay for it.
Source: Zero Hedge
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-18--Congressman Introduces Bill to End Civil Asset Forfeiture Nationwide, Allow Victims to Be Reimbursed

For decades now , federal government and their cohorts in law enforcement have been carrying out theft of the citizenry on a massive scale .
We ’ re not talking about taxes , but an insidious power known as Civil Asset Forfeiture ( CAF ) .
The 1980s-era laws were designed to drain resources from powerful criminal organizations , but CAF has become a tool for law enforcement agencies across the U.S. to steal money and property from countless innocent people .
No criminal charge is required for this confiscation , resulting in easy inflows of cash for law enforcement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This phenomenon is known as “ policing for profit.
” In the last 30 years , the amount of “ profit ” stolen through CAF has skyrocketted .
According to the US Department of Justice , the value of asset forfeiture recoveries by US authorities from 1989-2010 was $ 12,667,612,066 , increasing on average 19.5 % per year .
In 2008 , law enforcement took over $ 1.5 billion from the American public .
While this number seems incredibly large , just a few years later , in 2014 , that number tripled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we examine these numbers , and their nearly exponential growth curve , it appears that police in America are getting really good at separating the citizen from their property — not just really good , criminally good .
The good news is that Americans have been waking up to this Orwellian notion of police robbing the citizens , and they are taking a stand .
Even politicians have spoken out against this practice of robbing the innocent .
In 2018 , a lawsuit forced the city of Philadelphia to abolish their CAF program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its victims .
This was just one city , however , which is why this week , Rep. Justin Amash ( L-Mich. ) introduced the Civil Asset Forfeiture Elimination Act to repeal civil asset forfeiture nationwide .
In a press release put out by Amash ’ s office , the Congressman explained the need for such a bill .
Federal , state , and local law enforcement use civil asset forfeiture to take billions of dollars in cash and property from private citizens each year without convicting the owners of any crime .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ action against the property itself , alleging that the property is “ guilty ” of being connected to criminal activity .
This allows the government to take property without needing to charge the owner with a crime , prove their guilt , or otherwise afford them all the rights of a criminal defendant .
Often , the government gains ownership of such property automatically unless the owner files a claim for it within a short period of time .
And when an innocent owner does file a claim , many jurisdictions put the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prove their innocence , rather than requiring the government to prove their guilt .
By failing to protect property owners ’ constitutionally secured rights , civil forfeiture often leads to forfeitures of property belonging to innocent people .
In many cases , the property owner is not even accused of being involved in a crime ; it suffices that their property was used by someone else who is alleged to have committed a crime .
Civil asset forfeiture is incompatible with due process , but the courts have failed to recognize that fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cures this historical error and restores Americans ’ rights by eliminating civil asset forfeiture at the state and federal level .
“ Civil asset forfeiture is a due process violation , and it always has been , ” said Amash .
“ Its history is riddled with injustices not because it ’ s a valid practice that gets misused , but because its central premise—denying people their procedural rights—is inherently flawed .
By ending it , my bill helps fulfill Congress ’ s obligation to stop rights violations at both the state and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ practice that contributes to the frayed relationship between law enforcement and the public.
” Included in the text of the bill is a clause which allows citizens who have not been convicted of a crime to have their property returned to them .
It also eliminates all forms of civil asset forfeiture .
‘ ‘ No person shall be required , under the laws of the United States , to forfeit to the United States any property , real or personal , pursuant to a civil forfeiture proceeding , including a nonjudicial civil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Though this bill is nothing short of revolutionary , any lawmaker who opposes it exposes themselves as a thieving , due-process removing , tyrant .
Thank you Justin Amash for fighting the good fight .
It will be a sad day in the liberty movement when you leave Congress next session .
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA .
This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state .
Agorist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world .
Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project .
Follow @ MattAgorist on Twitter , Steemit , and now on Minds .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

By Matt Agorist
For decades now, federal government and their cohorts in law enforcement have been carrying out theft of the citizenry on a massive scale. We’re not talking about taxes, but an insidious power known as Civil Asset Forfeiture (CAF).
The 1980s-era laws were designed to drain resources from powerful criminal organizations, but CAF has become a tool for law enforcement agencies across the U.S. to steal money and property from countless innocent people.
No criminal charge is required for this confiscation, resulting in easy inflows of cash for law enforcement departments and the proliferation of abuse. This phenomenon is known as “policing for profit.”
In the last 30 years, the amount of “profit” stolen through CAF has skyrocketted.
According to the US Department of Justice, the value of asset forfeiture recoveries by US authorities from 1989-2010 was $12,667,612,066, increasing on average 19.5% per year.
In 2008, law enforcement took over $1.5 billion from the American public. While this number seems incredibly large, just a few years later, in 2014, that number tripled to nearly $4.5 billion.
When we examine these numbers, and their nearly exponential growth curve, it appears that police in America are getting really good at separating the citizen from their property — not just really good, criminally good.
The good news is that Americans have been waking up to this Orwellian notion of police robbing the citizens, and they are taking a stand. Even politicians have spoken out against this practice of robbing the innocent.
In 2018, a lawsuit forced the city of Philadelphia to abolish their CAF program and pay back millions it stole from its victims. This was just one city, however, which is why this week, Rep. Justin Amash (L-Mich.) introduced the Civil Asset Forfeiture Elimination Act to repeal civil asset forfeiture nationwide.
The government cannot lawfully jettison the rights of the accused for the sake of convenience and profit. End civil asset forfeiture. — Justin Amash (@justinamash) December 18, 2020
In a press release put out by Amash’s office, the Congressman explained the need for such a bill.
Federal, state, and local law enforcement use civil asset forfeiture to take billions of dollars in cash and property from private citizens each year without convicting the owners of any crime. Instead, the government brings a civil action against the property itself, alleging that the property is “guilty” of being connected to criminal activity. This allows the government to take property without needing to charge the owner with a crime, prove their guilt, or otherwise afford them all the rights of a criminal defendant. Often, the government gains ownership of such property automatically unless the owner files a claim for it within a short period of time. And when an innocent owner does file a claim, many jurisdictions put the burden of proof on the owner to prove their innocence, rather than requiring the government to prove their guilt. By failing to protect property owners’ constitutionally secured rights, civil forfeiture often leads to forfeitures of property belonging to innocent people. In many cases, the property owner is not even accused of being involved in a crime; it suffices that their property was used by someone else who is alleged to have committed a crime. Civil asset forfeiture is incompatible with due process, but the courts have failed to recognize that fact. The Civil Asset Forfeiture Elimination Act cures this historical error and restores Americans’ rights by eliminating civil asset forfeiture at the state and federal level.
“Civil asset forfeiture is a due process violation, and it always has been,” said Amash. “Its history is riddled with injustices not because it’s a valid practice that gets misused, but because its central premise—denying people their procedural rights—is inherently flawed. By ending it, my bill helps fulfill Congress’s obligation to stop rights violations at both the state and federal level, and it ends a practice that contributes to the frayed relationship between law enforcement and the public.”
Included in the text of the bill is a clause which allows citizens who have not been convicted of a crime to have their property returned to them. It also eliminates all forms of civil asset forfeiture.
‘‘No person shall be required, under the laws of the United States, to forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, pursuant to a civil forfeiture proceeding, including a nonjudicial civil forfeiture proceeding,” the bill states.
Though this bill is nothing short of revolutionary, any lawmaker who opposes it exposes themselves as a thieving, due-process removing, tyrant. Thank you Justin Amash for fighting the good fight. It will be a sad day in the liberty movement when you leave Congress next session.
Source: The Free Thought Project
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Minds.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-18--Movie Theaters Are On The Brink Of A Complete And Total Collapse

The hits just keep on coming for movie theaters .
With their businesses already thrashed by Covid , theaters are now having to deal with the threat of movies going “ straight to streaming ” and bypassing the box office altogether .
Disney , for example , said that its Disney+ service would have 100 new titles per year and that 80 % of these would bypass the box office .
Which means that theaters like AMC are going to be in a precarious position heading into 2021 regardless of what happens with the pandemic .
There are currently 40,449 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a new Bloomberg op-ed – a massive supply that will likely have to narrow in size even as people eventually start to trickle back to theaters .
Even prior to the pandemic , box offices were struggling mightily .
Box office sales adjusted for inflation have plunged over the last several years .
And post-pandemic , it ’ s going to take theaters months – if not years – to get back to the occupancy they had prior to Covid .
Some who used to go to movies simply won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ product of the pandemic , but also due to increased options in streaming .
It simply won ’ t be necessary anymore .
Recall , it was just days ago we wrote about Warning Bros. deciding it was going to snub studios in favor of streaming services .
We called it “ a move that is almost certainly going to set off a devastating chain reaction for what ’ s left of the movie theater industry ” when Warner Bros. decided it is going to release its major movies next year in theaters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time .
Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Included in its list of films for next year will be major features , like the next installment of The Matrix series and DC Comics movie The Suicide Squad , according to Bloomberg .
Theaters used to have exclusive rights to films for up to three months , the report notes .
But now , with most theaters either shut down or barren , studios are starting to shift their business models to protect the money they ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sales are down 78 % this year to $ 2.2 billion , according to Comscore .
In addition to gouging theaters , the new model could increase signups to HBO Max , which is owned by AT & T .
HBO Max is competing with well-known streaming services , like Disney+ and Netflix .
Theaters have experimented with studios in trying to change their business model to adapt as well .
Several movie chains entered into agreements with Universal this year to narrow the time between movies hitting the theater and when it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ll be surprised if theaters are able to do enough to offset what appears to just be the beginning of a dramatic shift that will pull new films out from their grasp heading into 2021 .
And once the shift to streaming starts – despite whether or not we have a vaccine that works – we can ’ t help but think that there ’ s likely no chance that studios turn back to their legacy business models .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Tyler Durden
The hits just keep on coming for movie theaters. With their businesses already thrashed by Covid, theaters are now having to deal with the threat of movies going “straight to streaming” and bypassing the box office altogether.
Disney, for example, said that its Disney+ service would have 100 new titles per year and that 80% of these would bypass the box office.
Which means that theaters like AMC are going to be in a precarious position heading into 2021 regardless of what happens with the pandemic. There are currently 40,449 movie screens in the U.S., according to a new Bloomberg op-ed – a massive supply that will likely have to narrow in size even as people eventually start to trickle back to theaters.
Even prior to the pandemic, box offices were struggling mightily. Box office sales adjusted for inflation have plunged over the last several years.
And post-pandemic, it’s going to take theaters months – if not years – to get back to the occupancy they had prior to Covid. Some who used to go to movies simply won’t go anymore, not only as a product of the pandemic, but also due to increased options in streaming. It simply won’t be necessary anymore.
Recall, it was just days ago we wrote about Warning Bros. deciding it was going to snub studios in favor of streaming services. We called it “a move that is almost certainly going to set off a devastating chain reaction for what’s left of the movie theater industry” when Warner Bros. decided it is going to release its major movies next year in theaters and on HBO Max at the same time.
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
Included in its list of films for next year will be major features, like the next installment of The Matrix series and DC Comics movie The Suicide Squad, according to Bloomberg.
Theaters used to have exclusive rights to films for up to three months, the report notes. But now, with most theaters either shut down or barren, studios are starting to shift their business models to protect the money they’ve invested in major films. Ticket sales are down 78% this year to $2.2 billion, according to Comscore.
Ann Sarnoff, chief executive officer of WarnerMedia Studios, said:
We know new content is the lifeblood of theatrical exhibition. But we have to balance this with the reality that most theaters in the U.S. will likely operate at reduced capacity throughout 2021.
In addition to gouging theaters, the new model could increase signups to HBO Max, which is owned by AT&T. HBO Max is competing with well-known streaming services, like Disney+ and Netflix.
Theaters have experimented with studios in trying to change their business model to adapt as well. Several movie chains entered into agreements with Universal this year to narrow the time between movies hitting the theater and when it can be sold online. But we’ll be surprised if theaters are able to do enough to offset what appears to just be the beginning of a dramatic shift that will pull new films out from their grasp heading into 2021.
And once the shift to streaming starts – despite whether or not we have a vaccine that works – we can’t help but think that there’s likely no chance that studios turn back to their legacy business models.
Image: Pixabay
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-18--Death of 9-Year-Old London Girl Linked to Air Pollution — “Could Open the Door to a Wave of Lawsuits

Death of 9-Year-Old London Girl Linked to Air Pollution — “Could Open the Door to a Wave of Lawsuits”

There is no doubt that some are more affected by air pollution than others .
But if your child suffered and died because of it – you might fight for change too .
This is the first time a death in Britain has been attributed to air pollution — legal experts say it could open the door to a wave of lawsuits by pollution victims and push the British government to crack down on air pollution .
Air pollution caused the asthma attack that killed 9-year-old Ella Adoo-Kissi-Debrah in 2013 , a London coroner said Wednesday .
The landmark determination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pollution ” was a “ significant contributory factor ” to Adoo-Kissi-Debrah ’ s death , is the first time a death in Britain has been attributed to air pollution , and legal experts say it could open the door to a wave of lawsuits by pollution victims and push the British government to crack down on air pollution .
Ella , who was Black , lived near a major circular road in southeast London , and her death is a stark illustration of the links between racism and environmental pollution .
“ We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than in the United States : Those who are producing less of the pollutants are the ones getting the most exposure , ” Jonathan Grigg , a professor of pediatric respiratory and environmental medicine at Queen Mary University London , told the New York Times .
Ella was hospitalized almost 30 times in less than three years , but her mother was never told of the health risks posed to her daughter by air pollution .
“ Today was a landmark case , a 7 year fight has resulted in air pollution being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Hopefully this will mean many more children ’ s lives being saved , ” Rosamund Adoo-Kissi-Debrah , Ella ’ s mother , wrote on Twitter .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
There is no doubt that some are more affected by air pollution than others. But if your child suffered and died because of it – you might fight for change too.
From Children’s Health Defense:
Landmark Ruling Links Death of London Girl to Air Pollution
This is the first time a death in Britain has been attributed to air pollution — legal experts say it could open the door to a wave of lawsuits by pollution victims and push the British government to crack down on air pollution.
By Climate Nexus
Air pollution caused the asthma attack that killed 9-year-old Ella Adoo-Kissi-Debrah in 2013, a London coroner said Wednesday.
The landmark determination, that “exposure to excessive air pollution” was a “significant contributory factor” to Adoo-Kissi-Debrah’s death, is the first time a death in Britain has been attributed to air pollution, and legal experts say it could open the door to a wave of lawsuits by pollution victims and push the British government to crack down on air pollution.
Ella, who was Black, lived near a major circular road in southeast London, and her death is a stark illustration of the links between racism and environmental pollution.
“We are facing the same issue in Britain than in the United States: Those who are producing less of the pollutants are the ones getting the most exposure,” Jonathan Grigg, a professor of pediatric respiratory and environmental medicine at Queen Mary University London, told the New York Times.
Ella was hospitalized almost 30 times in less than three years, but her mother was never told of the health risks posed to her daughter by air pollution.
“Today was a landmark case, a 7 year fight has resulted in air pollution being recognised on Ella’s death certificate. Hopefully this will mean many more children’s lives being saved,” Rosamund Adoo-Kissi-Debrah, Ella’s mother, wrote on Twitter.
Today was a landmark case, a 7 year fight has resulted in air pollution being recognised on Ella’s death certificate. Hopefully this will mean mean many more children’s lives being saved. Thank you everyone for your continued support. pic.twitter.com/02iNxVgmRd — The Ella Roberta Family Foundation (@rosamund_ElsFdn) December 16, 2020
RIP Ella.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-18--Another Study Says Kids’ Vision At Risk from Smartphone Use

Research had already indicated that Blue Light exposure from various sources – including smartphones – is harmful ( see 1 , 2 ) .
In fact , smartphone use has even been linked to temporary and permanent blindness .
Electronics and screens have also been blamed on an increase in nearsightedness among teens .
Research has also determined that electromagnetic radiation exposure from smartphones can harm eyes ( see 1 , 2 ) .
Now another study points to kids being more vulnerable to eye problems from smartphones .
Too Much Time on Smartphones Puts Kids at Higher Risk of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new meta-analysis published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research , smartphone overuse significantly increases the risk for ocular symptoms , including myopia , asthenopia and ocular surface disease , especially in children .
A new meta-analysis study found that use of smartphones may increase the likelihood of visual impairments in children and young adults .
According to the authors , one purpose of the study , published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research , was to use the meta-analysis ( a meta-analysis study is a statistical analysis that combines the results @ @ @ @ @ @ @ further guide potential interventions to reduce the harmful impact of smartphone overuse on vision in this susceptible subpopulation .
The authors reviewed 14 studies with a total of 27,110 subjects , all between the ages of 9.5 to 26 .
The results showed a statistically significant risk increase for ocular symptoms , including myopia , asthenopia and ocular surface disease , especially in children .
According to the study , the incidence of ocular problems has dramatically increased in line with the continuous rise in digital media consumption by youth .
The authors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ large portion of the population currently suffers from visual impairment , especially in Asian countries , with a rapidly increasing prevalence and younger age of onset.
” According to one study cited by the authors , an estimated 49.8 % ( 4.8 billion ) and 9.8 % ( 0.9 billion ) of the global population will have myopia or high myopia by 2050 .
Several studies reviewed for the meta-analysis found increased use of digital devices in children aged 2-11 years old .
One study that included children ages 9 – 11 from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the children exceeded recommended screen time guidelines ( ≤2 hours per day ) .
Compared with older people , children and young adults have greater risks of the undesirable consequences of smartphone overuse because they have less self-control in smartphone use , according to another study cited in the meta-analysis .
The authors called for further study , but said that “ [ o ] verall , smartphone overuse may result in significant harmful physical , psychological and social consequences .
”

By B.N. Frank
Research had already indicated that Blue Light exposure from various sources – including smartphones – is harmful (see 1, 2). In fact, smartphone use has even been linked to temporary and permanent blindness. Electronics and screens have also been blamed on an increase in nearsightedness among teens.
Research has also determined that electromagnetic radiation exposure from smartphones can harm eyes (see 1, 2). Now another study points to kids being more vulnerable to eye problems from smartphones.
From Children’s Health Defense:
Too Much Time on Smartphones Puts Kids at Higher Risk of Impaired Vision, Study Says
According to new meta-analysis published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, smartphone overuse significantly increases the risk for ocular symptoms, including myopia, asthenopia and ocular surface disease, especially in children.
A new meta-analysis study found that use of smartphones may increase the likelihood of visual impairments in children and young adults.
According to the authors, one purpose of the study, published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, was to use the meta-analysis (a meta-analysis study is a statistical analysis that combines the results of multiple scientific studies) to “further guide potential interventions to reduce the harmful impact of smartphone overuse on vision in this susceptible subpopulation.
The authors reviewed 14 studies with a total of 27,110 subjects, all between the ages of 9.5 to 26. The results showed a statistically significant risk increase for ocular symptoms, including myopia, asthenopia and ocular surface disease, especially in children.
According to the study, the incidence of ocular problems has dramatically increased in line with the continuous rise in digital media consumption by youth. The authors cite several studies indicating that “a large portion of the population currently suffers from visual impairment, especially in Asian countries, with a rapidly increasing prevalence and younger age of onset.”
According to one study cited by the authors, an estimated 49.8% (4.8 billion) and 9.8% (0.9 billion) of the global population will have myopia or high myopia by 2050.
Several studies reviewed for the meta-analysis found increased use of digital devices in children aged 2-11 years old. One study that included children ages 9 – 11 from 12 countries showed that 54.2% of the children exceeded recommended screen time guidelines (≤2 hours per day).
Compared with older people, children and young adults have greater risks of the undesirable consequences of smartphone overuse because they have less self-control in smartphone use, according to another study cited in the meta-analysis.
The authors called for further study, but said that “[o]verall, smartphone overuse may result in significant harmful physical, psychological and social consequences.”


activistpost--2020-12-18--Hackers Targeting Hospitals for Ransomware Causing Tragic Results

Hospitals worldwide are being targeted by hackers demanding ransom ( see 1 , 2 ) .
More about this unfortunate and sometimes deadly trend from Threatpost : Ransomware attacks targeting hospitals have exacted a human cost as well as financial .
Despite hospitals being on the front lines during the pandemic , bad actors have continued to target them with ransomware .
In addition to wreaking havoc on operational processes in medical facilities at the worst possible time , the attacks have evolved to threaten patient safety .
In September , employees at Universal Health Services ( UHS ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of hospitals , reported widespread outages that resulted in delayed lab results , a fallback to pen and paper , and patients being diverted to other hospitals .
The culprit turned out to be the Ryuk ransomware , which locked up hospital systems for days .
“ No patients died tonight in our [ emergency room ] but I can surely see how this could happen in large centers due to delay in patient care , ” a Reddit user identifying themselves as a nurse , wrote at the time .
The concern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ month , a ransomware attack at a Dusseldorf University hospital in Germany resulted in emergency-room diversions to other hospitals .
According to a report by the Ministry of Justice of the State North Rhine-Westphalia , a patient died who had to be taken to a more distant hospital in Wuppertal because of the attack on the clinic ’ s servers .

By B.N. Frank
Hospitals worldwide are being targeted by hackers demanding ransom (see 1, 2). More about this unfortunate and sometimes deadly trend from Threatpost:
Misery of Ransomware Hits Hospitals the Hardest
Ransomware attacks targeting hospitals have exacted a human cost as well as financial.
Despite hospitals being on the front lines during the pandemic, bad actors have continued to target them with ransomware. In addition to wreaking havoc on operational processes in medical facilities at the worst possible time, the attacks have evolved to threaten patient safety.
In September, employees at Universal Health Services (UHS), a Fortune-500 owner of a nationwide network of hospitals, reported widespread outages that resulted in delayed lab results, a fallback to pen and paper, and patients being diverted to other hospitals. The culprit turned out to be the Ryuk ransomware, which locked up hospital systems for days.
“No patients died tonight in our [emergency room] but I can surely see how this could happen in large centers due to delay in patient care,” a Reddit user identifying themselves as a nurse, wrote at the time.
The concern isn’t overblown. Earlier that month, a ransomware attack at a Dusseldorf University hospital in Germany resulted in emergency-room diversions to other hospitals. According to a report by the Ministry of Justice of the State North Rhine-Westphalia, a patient died who had to be taken to a more distant hospital in Wuppertal because of the attack on the clinic’s servers.
Read full article


activistpost--2020-12-19--Former Goldman CFO Calls For Universal Basic Income “To Stave Off Revolution”


activistpost--2020-12-19--Media Blackout: Moderna’s FDA Report Lists 13 Deaths in Vaccine Trials — 6 in Vaccine Group, 7 in Pl


activistpost--2020-12-19--More Electric Vehicle Woes – Lithium Mining for Their Batteries is Ecologically Disastrous

Electric Vehicles ( EVs ) aren ’ t turning out to be as wonderful as manufacturers and proponents had hoped .
Teslas have been plagued with problems ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) including fires .
Thousands of GM Electric Vehicles ( EVs ) were recently recalled for battery fires .
Citizens and environmentalists have also revealed serious ecological and economic consequences from lithium mining for rechargeable batteries .
The race is on to find a steady source of lithium , a key component in rechargeable electric car batteries .
But while the EU focuses on emissions , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on an industrial scale Even before the new mine became the main topic of village conversation , João Cassote , a 44-year-old livestock farmer , was thinking about making a change .
Living off the land in his mountainous part of northern Portugal was a grind .
Of his close childhood friends , he was the only one who hadn ’ t gone overseas in search of work .
So , in 2017 , when he heard of a British company prospecting for lithium in the region of Trás-os-Montes , Cassote called his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He bought a John Deere tractor , an earthmover and a portable water-storage tank .
The exploration team of the UK-based mining company Savannah Resources had spent months poring over geological maps and surveys of the hills that ripple out from Cassote ’ s farm .
Initial calculations indicated that they could contain more than 280,000 tonnes of lithium , a silver-white alkali metal – enough for 10 years ’ production .
Cassote got in touch with Savannah ’ s local office , and the mining firm duly contracted him to supply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The return on his investment was swift .
After less than 12 months on the company ’ s books , Cassote had made what he would usually earn in five or six years on the farm .
Savannah is just one of several mining companies with an eye on the rich lithium deposits of central and northern Portugal .
The sudden excitement surrounding petróleo branco ( “ white oil ” ) derives from an invention rarely seen in these parts : the electric car .
Lithium is a key active material in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It is found in rock and clay deposits as a solid mineral , as well as dissolved in brine .
It is popular with battery manufacturers because , as the least dense metal , it stores a lot of energy for its weight .
Electrifying transport has become a top priority in the move to a lower-carbon future .
In Europe , car travel accounts for around 12 % of all the continent ’ s carbon emissions .
To keep in line with the Paris agreement , emissions from cars and vans will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ third ( 37.5 % ) by 2030 .
The EU has set an ambitious goal of reducing overall greenhouse gas emissions by 55 % by the same date .
To that end , Brussels and individual member states are pouring millions of euros into incentivising car owners to switch to electric .
Some countries are going even further , proposing to ban sales of diesel and petrol vehicles in the near future ( as early as 2025 in the case of Norway ) .
If all goes to plan , European electric vehicle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 40m by 2030 .
It is predicted that there will be 40m electric cars in Europe by 2030 .
Lithium is key to this energy transition .
Lithium-ion batteries are used to power electric cars , as well as to store grid-scale electricity .
( They are also used in smartphones and laptops . )
But Europe has a problem .
At present , almost every ounce of battery-grade lithium is imported .
More than half ( 55 % ) of global lithium production last year originated in just one country : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as Chile ( 23 % ) , China ( 10 % ) and Argentina ( 8 % ) , are equally far-flung .
Lithium deposits have been discovered in Austria , Serbia and Finland , but it is in Portugal that Europe ’ s largest lithium hopes lie .
The Portuguese government is preparing to offer licences for lithium mining to international companies in a bid to exploit its “ white oil ” reserves .
Sourcing lithium in its own back yard not only offers Europe simpler logistics and lower prices , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Europe security of supply – an issue given greater urgency by the coronavirus pandemic ’ s disruption of global trade .
Even before the pandemic , alarm was mounting about sourcing lithium .
Dr Thea Riofrancos , a political economist at Providence College in Rhode Island , pointed to growing trade protectionism and the recent US-China trade spat .
( And that was before the trade row between China and Australia . )
Whatever worries EU policymakers might have had before the pandemic , she said , “ now they must be a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in getting a lithium supply has unleashed a mining boom , and the race for “ white oil ” threatens to cause damage to the natural environment wherever it is found .
But because they are helping to drive down emissions , the mining companies have EU environmental policy on their side .

By B.N. Frank
Electric Vehicles (EVs) aren’t turning out to be as wonderful as manufacturers and proponents had hoped. Teslas have been plagued with problems (see 1, 2, 3) including fires. Thousands of GM Electric Vehicles (EVs) were recently recalled for battery fires.
Citizens and environmentalists have also revealed serious ecological and economic consequences from lithium mining for rechargeable batteries.
From The Guardian:
The curse of ‘white oil’: electric vehicles’
The race is on to find a steady source of lithium, a key component in rechargeable electric car batteries. But while the EU focuses on emissions, the lithium gold rush threatens environmental damage on an industrial scale
by Oliver Balch
Even before the new mine became the main topic of village conversation, João Cassote, a 44-year-old livestock farmer, was thinking about making a change. Living off the land in his mountainous part of northern Portugal was a grind. Of his close childhood friends, he was the only one who hadn’t gone overseas in search of work. So, in 2017, when he heard of a British company prospecting for lithium in the region of Trás-os-Montes, Cassote called his bank and asked for a €200,000 loan. He bought a John Deere tractor, an earthmover and a portable water-storage tank.
The exploration team of the UK-based mining company Savannah Resources had spent months poring over geological maps and surveys of the hills that ripple out from Cassote’s farm. Initial calculations indicated that they could contain more than 280,000 tonnes of lithium, a silver-white alkali metal – enough for 10 years’ production. Cassote got in touch with Savannah’s local office, and the mining firm duly contracted him to supply water to their test drilling site. The return on his investment was swift. After less than 12 months on the company’s books, Cassote had made what he would usually earn in five or six years on the farm.
Savannah is just one of several mining companies with an eye on the rich lithium deposits of central and northern Portugal. The sudden excitement surrounding petróleo branco (“white oil”) derives from an invention rarely seen in these parts: the electric car. Lithium is a key active material in the rechargeable batteries that run electric cars. It is found in rock and clay deposits as a solid mineral, as well as dissolved in brine. It is popular with battery manufacturers because, as the least dense metal, it stores a lot of energy for its weight.
Electrifying transport has become a top priority in the move to a lower-carbon future. In Europe, car travel accounts for around 12% of all the continent’s carbon emissions. To keep in line with the Paris agreement, emissions from cars and vans will need to drop by more than a third (37.5%) by 2030. The EU has set an ambitious goal of reducing overall greenhouse gas emissions by 55% by the same date. To that end, Brussels and individual member states are pouring millions of euros into incentivising car owners to switch to electric. Some countries are going even further, proposing to ban sales of diesel and petrol vehicles in the near future (as early as 2025 in the case of Norway). If all goes to plan, European electric vehicle ownership could jump from around 2m today to 40m by 2030.
It is predicted that there will be 40m electric cars in Europe by 2030.
Lithium is key to this energy transition. Lithium-ion batteries are used to power electric cars, as well as to store grid-scale electricity. (They are also used in smartphones and laptops.) But Europe has a problem. At present, almost every ounce of battery-grade lithium is imported. More than half (55%) of global lithium production last year originated in just one country: Australia. Other principal suppliers, such as Chile (23%), China (10%) and Argentina (8%), are equally far-flung.
Lithium deposits have been discovered in Austria, Serbia and Finland, but it is in Portugal that Europe’s largest lithium hopes lie. The Portuguese government is preparing to offer licences for lithium mining to international companies in a bid to exploit its “white oil” reserves. Sourcing lithium in its own back yard not only offers Europe simpler logistics and lower prices, but fewer transport-related emissions. It also promises Europe security of supply – an issue given greater urgency by the coronavirus pandemic’s disruption of global trade.
Even before the pandemic, alarm was mounting about sourcing lithium. Dr Thea Riofrancos, a political economist at Providence College in Rhode Island, pointed to growing trade protectionism and the recent US-China trade spat. (And that was before the trade row between China and Australia.) Whatever worries EU policymakers might have had before the pandemic, she said, “now they must be a million times higher”.
The urgency in getting a lithium supply has unleashed a mining boom, and the race for “white oil” threatens to cause damage to the natural environment wherever it is found. But because they are helping to drive down emissions, the mining companies have EU environmental policy on their side.
Read full article


activistpost--2020-12-19--Victory! Federal Appeals Court Confirms FOIA Requests Requiring a Database Query are Allowed Under t

Victory! Federal Appeals Court Confirms FOIA Requests Requiring a Database Query are Allowed Under the Law

At a time when the federal government is collecting and creating massive amounts of digital data that can implicate people ’ s privacy and free speech rights , it is crucial that the public know what the government is doing with that information .
A ruling from a federal appellate court earlier this month ensures that the Freedom of Information Act , one of the most important legal tools citizens and reporters have for furthering government transparency , allows the public to understand the government ’ s use of digital data .
The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ case brought by the Center for Investigative Reporting against the Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco , Firearms and Explosives ( ATF ) seeking aggregate data about the number of weapons used in crimes that could be traced back to being originally purchased by law enforcement .
The district court below ruled that ATF did not have to produce the data because the search query of the agency ’ s data would have amounted to creating a new record , something that FOIA prohibits .
The lower court ’ s ruling was dangerous because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FOIA requesters from obtaining digital data based largely on a misunderstanding of how digital data is stored and what occurs when people query databases .
EFF filed a friend-of-the-court brief to point out how the initial decision could “ frustrate access to vast amounts of government digital data in which the public has a legitimate interest.
” EFF ’ s brief argued further that the ruling was out of touch with the reality that the government is “ collecting and centralizing extensive swaths of personally identifying data on members of the public , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expressive activity on social media.
” Another friend-of-the-court brief written by Harvard Law School ’ s Cyberlaw Clinic on behalf of data journalists and media organizations pointedly described how database queries that produce aggregate records in no way resemble creating a new physical or digital record .
Instead , because a query is simply an instruction to the database “ to select a specific subset of information from a database and return it in a particular arrangement , ” the result is not a new record but rather just a representation of responsive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ninth Circuit recognized the broader concerns at issue in this case , writing , “ as CIR and amici recognize , whether a search query of an existing database entails the creation of a ‘ new record ’ is a question of great importance in the digital age.
” The Ninth Circuit ’ s opinion quotes EFF and the Cyberlaw clinic ’ s briefs throughout .
For example , the court quotes EFF ’ s argument that FOIA requests seeking access to aggregate data are essential to balance the public ’ s interest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and other personal data it collects without disclosing the underlying data that is often private or otherwise intrusive .
The court wrote : In rejecting the district court ’ s interpretation of FOIA , the Ninth Circuit concluded that “ if running a search across these databases necessarily amounts to the creation of a new record , much government information will become forever inaccessible under FOIA , a result plainly contrary to Congress ’ s purpose in enacting FOIA.
” We are grateful that the Ninth Circuit understood both the underlying technology at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
By recognizing that FOIA allows requesters to seek aggregate data from federal agencies , the court ensured that the transparency law remains an important tool for people to learn about government use and abuse of the data it collects .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Markets today .

By Aaron Mackey
At a time when the federal government is collecting and creating massive amounts of digital data that can implicate people’s privacy and free speech rights, it is crucial that the public know what the government is doing with that information. A ruling from a federal appellate court earlier this month ensures that the Freedom of Information Act, one of the most important legal tools citizens and reporters have for furthering government transparency, allows the public to understand the government’s use of digital data.
The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit came in a case brought by the Center for Investigative Reporting against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) seeking aggregate data about the number of weapons used in crimes that could be traced back to being originally purchased by law enforcement. The district court below ruled that ATF did not have to produce the data because the search query of the agency’s data would have amounted to creating a new record, something that FOIA prohibits.
The lower court’s ruling was dangerous because it had the potential to broadly restrict FOIA requesters from obtaining digital data based largely on a misunderstanding of how digital data is stored and what occurs when people query databases. EFF filed a friend-of-the-court brief to point out how the initial decision could “frustrate access to vast amounts of government digital data in which the public has a legitimate interest.” EFF’s brief argued further that the ruling was out of touch with the reality that the government is “collecting and centralizing extensive swaths of personally identifying data on members of the public, including extremely sensitive information like biometrics and expressive activity on social media.”
Another friend-of-the-court brief written by Harvard Law School’s Cyberlaw Clinic on behalf of data journalists and media organizations pointedly described how database queries that produce aggregate records in no way resemble creating a new physical or digital record. Instead, because a query is simply an instruction to the database “to select a specific subset of information from a database and return it in a particular arrangement,” the result is not a new record but rather just a representation of responsive data in the underlying database.
The Ninth Circuit recognized the broader concerns at issue in this case, writing, “as CIR and amici recognize, whether a search query of an existing database entails the creation of a ‘new record’ is a question of great importance in the digital age.”
The Ninth Circuit’s opinion quotes EFF and the Cyberlaw clinic’s briefs throughout. For example, the court quotes EFF’s argument that FOIA requests seeking access to aggregate data are essential to balance the public’s interest in understanding how the government uses biometric and other personal data it collects without disclosing the underlying data that is often private or otherwise intrusive. The court wrote:
Moreover, as in this case, ‘[r]eleasing statistical aggregate data from government Databases’ may sometimes prove the ‘only[] way to comply with FOIA’s mandate while properly balancing the public’s and the government’s interests in safeguarding sensitive information.’
In rejecting the district court’s interpretation of FOIA, the Ninth Circuit concluded that “if running a search across these databases necessarily amounts to the creation of a new record, much government information will become forever inaccessible under FOIA, a result plainly contrary to Congress’s purpose in enacting FOIA.”
We are grateful that the Ninth Circuit understood both the underlying technology at issue and the stakes of this case. By recognizing that FOIA allows requesters to seek aggregate data from federal agencies, the court ensured that the transparency law remains an important tool for people to learn about government use and abuse of the data it collects.
Source: EFF
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-20--The Hidden Truth About The NDAA 2021

The Hidden Truth About The NDAA 2021

The U.S. Senate recently voted 84 to 13 in favor of the 2021 version of the annual military budget , the National Defense Authorization Act ( NDAA ) .
The Senate ’ s vote follows a 335 to 78 vote by the House of Representatives .
Despite promises of a veto from Donald Trump , the bill currently has a veto-proof two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate .
Trump has until December 23rd to decide if he try to veto the $ 740.5 billion bill .
Most of the media discussion about the 2021 NDAA has revolved around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to renaming military bases named after Confederate war heroes and the battle over Section 230 of the Communication Act .
Trump has stated that his admin “ will not even consider the renaming of these Magnificent and Fabled Military Installations ” .
He also threatened to veto the massive spending bill if Section 230 of the Communication Act was not “ completely terminated ” to allow internet providers and Big Tech companies like Facebook and Twitter to be held legally liable for the content on their websites .
Trump has argued the social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to reduce online censorship or deletion of content falsely labeled “ misinformation ” .
While the discussions about the names of military bases and Section 230 arguably have their place in a discussion on the 2021 NDAA , an exclusive focus on these topics ignores troubling concerns in the remainder of the bill .
White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany stated that Trump is concerned about a provision in the bill relating to troop withdrawal and deployment in Afghanistan , South Korea , and Germany .
The NDAA includes amendments that seek to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Germany .
If these new amendments are included in the bill it would require a review from several government agencies prior to any future troop withdrawals .
On December 10 , Senator Rand Paul spoke out about provisions in the NDAA 2021 , stating that the new bill would prevent future presidents from being able to withdraw troops without consulting with Congress first .
Paul said these provisions would prolong the failed War on Terror .
Another product of the War on Terror ( aka the War on Freedom ) is a provision @ @ @ @ @ @ @ included in the 2011 version of the bill .
Some readers may recall that since 2011 the NDAA has included a provision which allows for indefinite detention of American citizens without a right to trial .
The bill was signed into law by former President Obama and the indefinite detention provision is still contained in the NDAA , having been approved by Congress every year since it first passed .
When the indefinite detention clause was first included there were many mainstream news reports discussing the dangerous potential for the provision .
There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even a federal lawsuit that ultimately failed to remove the provision .
However , as we approach 2021 there is hardly a mention of the indefinite detention clause anywhere in corporate media .
Unfortunately , there appears to be very few in the political world willing to speak up about the issue .
One of the few to speak up during the recent round of voting is Justin Amash , a Libertarian representing Michigan ’ s 3rd Congressional District .
Amash has consistently spoken out against the indefinite detention clause .
On December @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tweeting , “ Voted no on the NDAA .
Voted no on all the NDAAs .
Bring home the troops .
Stop indefinite detention without charge or trial .
Fight the military-industrial complex.
” Become an Activist Post Patron for just $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Without a proper understanding that the NDAA is the ever-growing blank check for the military industrial complex that allows for indefinite detention of Americans , the public is hopelessly lost .
Until the general public is aware of the danger of these measures they will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by a government and media desperate to continue the war machine .
While the corporate media is playing out a fake drama – will Trump really veto the NDAA ?
?
– there is no mention of the fact that American citizens are still susceptible to indefinite detention ( no trial , no jury ) if accused of “ terrorism ” , and there is an even bigger threat to American ’ s privacy and liberty .
Due to the fact that the annual NDAA is a must-pass bill , many politicians attach @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the bill would never be rejected by any “ patriotic ” American – or a politician who does not want to be labeled “ anti-American ” .
The 2021 NDAA includes dozens of new initiatives and updates to existing departments related to the growth of Artificial Intelligence ( AI ) .
The change requires the JAIC to report directly to the Deputy Secretary of Defense .
This elevation of the DOD ’ s Joint AI Center is a sign that U.S. military leadership is taking serious the rise of AI and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The 2021 NDAA also includes a previous bill known as the AI Initiative Act that will create a new organization known as the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Office under the White House ’ s Office of Science and Technology Policy .
The Act will increase federal spending on AI research and increase coordination across government agencies .
Another bill , the National AI Research Resource Task Force Act , calls on the National Science Foundation to investigate methods for AI research funding .
The bill also includes what has been called “ one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to date.
” FedScoop reports that recommendations issued by the Cyberspace Solarium Commission – a commission created by the 2019 NDAA – made it into the final version of the 2021 NDAA .
The recommendations included creating a national cyber director in the White House .
Concerns about the rise of AI – and the dangers it poses to liberty and privacy – date back to 2015 , when Stephen Hawking , Elon Musk , and other academics signed a letter warning that the push towards AI could lead to a global arms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Artificial Intelligence , called for banning AI technology that humans “ have no meaningful control over.
” While the media ignores the massive injection of bills related to AI , several prominent voices in Congress are claiming that passing the 2021 NDAA is more important than ever due to the alleged hacking of U.S. government networks .
In recent days , the corporate media has unquestionably repeated claims that the Russian government hacked U.S. networks using malware embedded in network management software made by the firm SolarWinds .
Senator Angus King of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Solarium Commission , stated that the SolarWinds “ hack ” proves why Trump must sign the 2021 NDAA .
“ This is the most important bill on cyber ever passed by Congress , and that ’ s why I ’ m really hoping that the president will either sign the bill or let it become law without a signature , because there is so much critically important material in the bill , ” King said during an annual summit hosted by Defense One .
The timing of the apparent hack is convenient for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the military unlimited financial resources with which they can develop the AI weapons of the future .
These threats/warnings about a coming cyber attack – sometimes deemed the “ digital 9/11 ” or “ cyber 9/11 ” – have been common since at least 2012 .
For years the U.S. government , the FBI , and NSA have attempted to erode encryption and privacy based on exaggerated claims about terrorism and cyber war .
Interestingly , two members of the World Economic Forum recently spoke about the potential for a cyber attack that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Jeremy Jurgens , WEF Managing Director , stated that he believed there would be a new crisis that would be “ faster than what we ’ ve seen with COVID ” and have a greater impact on the economy and society .
This statement was affirmed by WEF chairman Klaus Schwab when he stated : These statements and the timing of the SolarWinds fiasco should not be ignored , especially in light of the World Economic Forum ’ s role in promoting The Great Reset .
As with COVID19 , the WEF @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to use the threat of a cyber attack as an opportunity to remake global infrastructure , with a heavy dependence on Artificial Intelligence .
The passing of the 2021 NDAA is simply one more step towards Schwab ’ s vision of The Great Reset .
In an upcoming report I will examine the SolarWinds claims , the role of AI in The Great Reset , and what we can do to stop the Technocratic State .
Question Everything , Come To Your Own Conclusions .
Derrick Broze , a staff writer for The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , author , public speaker , and activist .
He is the co-host of Free Thinker Radio on 90.1 Houston , as well as the founder of The Conscious Resistance Network & The Houston Free Thinkers .
Visit TheLastAmericanVagabond.com .
Subscribe to TLAV ’ s independent news broadcast on YouTube or iTunes .
Follow on Facebook , Twitter , and Minds .
Support at Patreon or PayPal .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Derrick Broze
The U.S. Senate recently voted 84 to 13 in favor of the 2021 version of the annual military budget, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The Senate’s vote follows a 335 to 78 vote by the House of Representatives. Despite promises of a veto from Donald Trump, the bill currently has a veto-proof two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate. Trump has until December 23rd to decide if he try to veto the $740.5 billion bill.
Most of the media discussion about the 2021 NDAA has revolved around two issues: Trump’s opposition to renaming military bases named after Confederate war heroes and the battle over Section 230 of the Communication Act.
Trump has stated that his admin “will not even consider the renaming of these Magnificent and Fabled Military Installations”. He also threatened to veto the massive spending bill if Section 230 of the Communication Act was not “completely terminated” to allow internet providers and Big Tech companies like Facebook and Twitter to be held legally liable for the content on their websites. Trump has argued the social media giants should be treated like publishers to reduce online censorship or deletion of content falsely labeled “misinformation”.
While the discussions about the names of military bases and Section 230 arguably have their place in a discussion on the 2021 NDAA, an exclusive focus on these topics ignores troubling concerns in the remainder of the bill.
Indefinite War, Indefinite Detention
White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany stated that Trump is concerned about a provision in the bill relating to troop withdrawal and deployment in Afghanistan, South Korea, and Germany. The NDAA includes amendments that seek to block planned troop drawdowns from Afghanistan and Germany. If these new amendments are included in the bill it would require a review from several government agencies prior to any future troop withdrawals.
On December 10, Senator Rand Paul spoke out about provisions in the NDAA 2021, stating that the new bill would prevent future presidents from being able to withdraw troops without consulting with Congress first. Paul said these provisions would prolong the failed War on Terror.
Another product of the War on Terror (aka the War on Freedom) is a provision contained in the NDAA which was originally included in the 2011 version of the bill. Some readers may recall that since 2011 the NDAA has included a provision which allows for indefinite detention of American citizens without a right to trial. The bill was signed into law by former President Obama and the indefinite detention provision is still contained in the NDAA, having been approved by Congress every year since it first passed.
When the indefinite detention clause was first included there were many mainstream news reports discussing the dangerous potential for the provision. There were dozens of politicians speaking out and even a federal lawsuit that ultimately failed to remove the provision. However, as we approach 2021 there is hardly a mention of the indefinite detention clause anywhere in corporate media. Unfortunately, there appears to be very few in the political world willing to speak up about the issue.
One of the few to speak up during the recent round of voting is Justin Amash, a Libertarian representing Michigan’s 3rd Congressional District. Amash has consistently spoken out against the indefinite detention clause. On December 8, he spoke out again, tweeting, “Voted no on the NDAA. Voted no on all the NDAAs. Bring home the troops. Stop indefinite detention without charge or trial. Fight the military-industrial complex.”
Become an Activist Post Patron for just $1 per month at Patreon.
Voted no on the NDAA.
Voted no on all the NDAAs. Bring home the troops.
Stop indefinite detention without charge or trial.
Fight the military-industrial complex. — Justin Amash (@justinamash) December 8, 2020
Without a proper understanding that the NDAA is the ever-growing blank check for the military industrial complex that allows for indefinite detention of Americans, the public is hopelessly lost. Until the general public is aware of the danger of these measures they will continue to be lied to and manipulated by a government and media desperate to continue the war machine.
The Artificial Intelligence-Military Industrial Complex
While the corporate media is playing out a fake drama – will Trump really veto the NDAA?? – there is no mention of the fact that American citizens are still susceptible to indefinite detention (no trial, no jury) if accused of “terrorism”, and there is an even bigger threat to American’s privacy and liberty.
Due to the fact that the annual NDAA is a must-pass bill, many politicians attach their own pet projects under the assumption that the bill would never be rejected by any “patriotic” American – or a politician who does not want to be labeled “anti-American”. The 2021 NDAA includes dozens of new initiatives and updates to existing departments related to the growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI).
Courthouse News recently reported:
“The bill also features changes to cyber policy for the military. One provision approved by the House and Senate moves reporting requirements from the Department of Defense’s Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. The body evaluates how to improve U.S. defense through advanced artificial intelligence technology.”
The change requires the JAIC to report directly to the Deputy Secretary of Defense. This elevation of the DOD’s Joint AI Center is a sign that U.S. military leadership is taking serious the rise of AI and the potential military applications for the technology.
The 2021 NDAA also includes a previous bill known as the AI Initiative Act that will create a new organization known as the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Office under the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy. The Act will increase federal spending on AI research and increase coordination across government agencies. Another bill, the National AI Research Resource Task Force Act, calls on the National Science Foundation to investigate methods for AI research funding.
The bill also includes what has been called “one of the largest pieces of cybersecurity legislation to date.” FedScoop reports that recommendations issued by the Cyberspace Solarium Commission – a commission created by the 2019 NDAA – made it into the final version of the 2021 NDAA. The recommendations included creating a national cyber director in the White House.
(For more info on all the AI related provisions in the 2021 NDAA see this)
Concerns about the rise of AI – and the dangers it poses to liberty and privacy – date back to 2015, when Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk, and other academics signed a letter warning that the push towards AI could lead to a global arms race. The letter, Open Letter on Artificial Intelligence, called for banning AI technology that humans “have no meaningful control over.”
A Cyber Pandemic?
While the media ignores the massive injection of bills related to AI, several prominent voices in Congress are claiming that passing the 2021 NDAA is more important than ever due to the alleged hacking of U.S. government networks. In recent days, the corporate media has unquestionably repeated claims that the Russian government hacked U.S. networks using malware embedded in network management software made by the firm SolarWinds.
Senator Angus King of Maine, a member of the Cyberspace Solarium Commission, stated that the SolarWinds “hack” proves why Trump must sign the 2021 NDAA. “This is the most important bill on cyber ever passed by Congress, and that’s why I’m really hoping that the president will either sign the bill or let it become law without a signature, because there is so much critically important material in the bill,” King said during an annual summit hosted by Defense One.
The timing of the apparent hack is convenient for cyber war hawks who wish to grant the military unlimited financial resources with which they can develop the AI weapons of the future. These threats/warnings about a coming cyber attack – sometimes deemed the “digital 9/11” or “cyber 9/11” – have been common since at least 2012. For years the U.S. government, the FBI, and NSA have attempted to erode encryption and privacy based on exaggerated claims about terrorism and cyber war.
Interestingly, two members of the World Economic Forum recently spoke about the potential for a cyber attack that would be a greater crisis than COVID-19. Jeremy Jurgens, WEF Managing Director, stated that he believed there would be a new crisis that would be “faster than what we’ve seen with COVID” and have a greater impact on the economy and society.
This statement was affirmed by WEF chairman Klaus Schwab when he stated:
“We all know, but still pay insufficient attention, to the frightening scenario of a comprehensive cyber attack could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole. The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyberattack.”
These statements and the timing of the SolarWinds fiasco should not be ignored, especially in light of the World Economic Forum’s role in promoting The Great Reset. As with COVID19, the WEF, technocrats, and governments are attempting to use the threat of a cyber attack as an opportunity to remake global infrastructure, with a heavy dependence on Artificial Intelligence. The passing of the 2021 NDAA is simply one more step towards Schwab’s vision of The Great Reset.
In an upcoming report I will examine the SolarWinds claims, the role of AI in The Great Reset, and what we can do to stop the Technocratic State.
Question Everything, Come To Your Own Conclusions.
Source: The Last American Vagabond
Derrick Broze, a staff writer for The Last American Vagabond, is a journalist, author, public speaker, and activist. He is the co-host of Free Thinker Radio on 90.1 Houston, as well as the founder of The Conscious Resistance Network & The Houston Free Thinkers.
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/category/derrick-broze/
Visit TheLastAmericanVagabond.com. Subscribe to TLAV’s independent news broadcast on YouTube or iTunes. Follow on Facebook, Twitter, and Minds. Support at Patreon or PayPal.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-20--Dr. Paul Thomas Targeted By Medical Board & Media After Landmark Vaccine Study — Interview

Recently , a landmark study was conducted by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler and Dr. Paul Thomas .
The study compared vaccinated children and unvaccinated children and was published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health on November 22 , 2020 after being peer reviewed .
Dr. Weiler , a research scientist and co-author of the study , was recently interviewed by Activist Post Contributor Spiro Skouras .
In the interview , Weiler breaks down the data from the study which indicates children who were vaccinated showed a higher rate of medical office visits and experienced an elevated rate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ behavioral issues , to ADHD and Anemia .
In this report , Spiro interviews Dr. Paul Thomas , a prominent pediatrician in Portland , Oregon who also co-authored the study and used 10+ years of data from his medical practice to conduct the study .
Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Shortly after the vaccinated versus unvaccinated study was published , five days in fact , the Oregon State Medical Board held an emergency meeting declaring that Dr. Paul was an immediate threat to his patients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ license .
In this must-see interview , Dr. Paul addresses the accusations leveled against himself and his practice , in addition to breaking down in detail the study ’ s findings .
Dr. Paul also weighs in on the CDC recommended vaccine schedule and the experimental Covid vaccine .
Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated : The Study The CDC Refused To Do — Interview with Dr. Weiler https : //www.activistpost.com/2020/12/vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-the-study-the-cdc-refused-to-do-interview-with-dr-weiler.html It ’ s Here !
The Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed Study !
https : //informedchoicewa.org/education/its-here-the-vaxxed-vs-unvaxxed-study/ Prominent Anti-Vaccine Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas Has License Suspended by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Paul Thomas Has 15,000 Patients—and He Tells Them the Measles Vaccine Might Cause Autism https : //www.wweek.com/news/2019/03/20/pediatrician-paul-thomas-has-15000-patients-and-he-tells-them-the-measles-vaccine-might-cause-autism/ Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Spiro Skouras
Recently, a landmark study was conducted by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler and Dr. Paul Thomas. The study compared vaccinated children and unvaccinated children and was published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health on November 22, 2020 after being peer reviewed.
Dr. Weiler, a research scientist and co-author of the study, was recently interviewed by Activist Post Contributor Spiro Skouras. In the interview, Weiler breaks down the data from the study which indicates children who were vaccinated showed a higher rate of medical office visits and experienced an elevated rate of medical symptoms ranging from Asthma and behavioral issues, to ADHD and Anemia.
In this report, Spiro interviews Dr. Paul Thomas, a prominent pediatrician in Portland, Oregon who also co-authored the study and used 10+ years of data from his medical practice to conduct the study.
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
Shortly after the vaccinated versus unvaccinated study was published, five days in fact, the Oregon State Medical Board held an emergency meeting declaring that Dr. Paul was an immediate threat to his patients and the public and suspended his medical license.
In this must-see interview, Dr. Paul addresses the accusations leveled against himself and his practice, in addition to breaking down in detail the study’s findings. Dr. Paul also weighs in on the CDC recommended vaccine schedule and the experimental Covid vaccine.
BitChute Backup
?
Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated: The Study The CDC Refused To Do — Interview with Dr. Weiler
https://www.activistpost.com/2020/12/vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-the-study-the-cdc-refused-to-do-interview-with-dr-weiler.html
Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Study PDF
https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.107/7mw.a02.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ijerph-17-08674.pdf
It’s Here! The Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed Study!
https://informedchoicewa.org/education/its-here-the-vaxxed-vs-unvaxxed-study/
Dr. Paul Approved
https://www.drpaulapproved.com/home28493553
Freedom To Choose
https://www.paulthomasmd.com/freedomtochoose.html
Anti-vaccine Portland pediatrician’s license suspended; cases include boy hospitalized with tetanus
https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2020/12/anti-vaccine-portland-pediatricians-license-suspended-cases-include-boy-hospitalized-with-tetanus.html
Prominent Anti-Vaccine Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas Has License Suspended by the Oregon Medical Board
https://www.wweek.com/news/state/2020/12/05/prominent-anti-vaccine-pediatrician-dr-paul-thomas-has-license-suspended-by-the-oregon-medical-board/
Pediatrician Paul Thomas Has 15,000 Patients—and He Tells Them the Measles Vaccine Might Cause Autism
https://www.wweek.com/news/2019/03/20/pediatrician-paul-thomas-has-15000-patients-and-he-tells-them-the-measles-vaccine-might-cause-autism/
Follow Spiro on BitChute bitchute.com/channel/spiro/ Follow on Twitter https://twitter.com/o_rips
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-20--Lithium Battery Recall:  LG Energy Solution Michigan Recalls Home Energy Storage Batteries Due to Ov

Lithium Battery Recall:  LG Energy Solution Michigan Recalls Home Energy Storage Batteries Due to Overheating, Harmful Smoke, and Fire Risk

Lithium mining has come under scrutiny due grave ecological and economic problems associated with the practice .
Lithium battery fires have been an issue too and another recall was announced earlier this week .
From the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission : Hazard : The home batteries can overheat , posing a risk of fire and emission of harmful smoke .
LG Energy Solution Michigan toll-free at 866-263-0301 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m .
ET Monday through Friday , email at [ email protected ] , or online at www.lgessbattery.com/us and click on “ Battery Recall : Free Replacement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : This recall involves the LG Chem Model RESU 10H lithium-ion storage battery that is installed as part of a residential energy solar panel system .
The recalled battery allows owners to capture and store energy from the solar panels .
The batteries are wall mounted and measure 29.30 x 35.70 x 8.10 inches .
They weigh roughly 220 pounds .
The LG Chem logo is located on the top left side of the front panel .
The serial number of the recalled product begins with R15563P3SSEG and is located behind the access @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) home battery .
Remedy : Consumers with recalled batteries should immediately contact LG Energy Solution Michigan to schedule a free replacement .
LG Energy Solution Michigan , its distributors and its installers also are attempting to contact all owners directly to arrange for modifications to the recalled batteries to reduce the risk of overheating until they can be replaced with new batteries .
Incidents/Injuries : The firm has received five reports of fires resulting in minor property damage .
No injuries have been reported .
Sold At : Various distributors of solar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but not limited to Sunrun , AEE Solar , Baywa , CED , Krannich , Independent Electric Supply , and Inter Island Solar Supply , from January 2017 through March 2019 for about $ 8,000 .
Importer ( s ) : LG Energy Solution Michigan , Inc. , of Holland , Mich. ( formerly LG Chem Michigan Inc. ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary of LG Energy Solution , Ltd. ( in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of LG Chem Ltd. ) .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
Lithium mining has come under scrutiny due grave ecological and economic problems associated with the practice. Lithium battery fires have been an issue too and another recall was announced earlier this week.
From the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission:
Name of product:
LG Chem “RESU 10H” Lithium-Ion Residential Energy Storage System
Hazard:
The home batteries can overheat, posing a risk of fire and emission of harmful smoke.
Remedy:
Replace
Recall date:
December 16, 2020
Units:
About 1,815
Consumer Contact:
LG Energy Solution Michigan toll-free at 866-263-0301 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, email at RESUservice@lgensol.com, or online at www.lgessbattery.com/us and click on “Battery Recall: Free Replacement Campaign” for more information.
Recall Details
Description:
This recall involves the LG Chem Model RESU 10H lithium-ion storage battery that is installed as part of a residential energy solar panel system. The recalled battery allows owners to capture and store energy from the solar panels. The batteries are wall mounted and measure 29.30 x 35.70 x 8.10 inches. They weigh roughly 220 pounds. The LG Chem logo is located on the top left side of the front panel. The serial number of the recalled product begins with R15563P3SSEG and is located behind the access door of the RESU 10H (Type-R) home battery.
Remedy:
Consumers with recalled batteries should immediately contact LG Energy Solution Michigan to schedule a free replacement. LG Energy Solution Michigan, its distributors and its installers also are attempting to contact all owners directly to arrange for modifications to the recalled batteries to reduce the risk of overheating until they can be replaced with new batteries.
Incidents/Injuries:
The firm has received five reports of fires resulting in minor property damage. No injuries have been reported.
Sold At:
Various distributors of solar energy storage systems nationwide, including, but not limited to Sunrun, AEE Solar, Baywa, CED, Krannich, Independent Electric Supply, and Inter Island Solar Supply, from January 2017 through March 2019 for about $8,000.
Importer(s):
LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc., of Holland, Mich. (formerly LG Chem Michigan Inc.), a wholly-owned subsidiary of LG Energy Solution, Ltd. (in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of LG Chem Ltd.).
Manufactured In:
Korea
Recall number:
21-055
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.