activistpost--2020-10-19--Louisiana Man Who Was Given Life Sentence for Stealing Hedge Clippers Finally Walks Free

A man who was serving a life sentence in Louisiana for stealing hedge clippers from someone ’ s garage in 1997 has been granted parole after spending 23 years in prison .
Fair Wayne Bryant , 63 , was facing life behind bars due to the attempted burglary conviction and his criminal record .
However , the state ’ s draconian habitual offender laws led to Bryant ’ s harsh sentence .
Bryant ’ s life sentence became the subject of withering criticism from civil liberties advocates and the chief justice of Louisiana ’ s Supreme Court , who called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and a legacy of slavery and racism in the Southern state .
According to Bryant ’ s parole panel , Bryant ’ s criminal record consisted of 22 arrests and 11 convictions .
The past convictions included four felonies , only one of which was for a violent crime – an attempted armed robbery of a taxi driver in 1979 .
In 1997 , Bryant was driving when his car stalled and he went into somebody ’ s garage looking for a tank of gas .
At that point , he was encountered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When police apprehended him , he was accused of having stolen a pair of hedge clippers that were found in his vehicle , a claim that he denied .
Evidence suggested that he had , however , intended to commit theft .
Bryant ’ s previous criminal record and the state ’ s harsh repeat offender laws led to him receiving a life sentence , which he tried to appeal for the next 23 years .
Two months ago , Bryant ’ s case appeared before the Louisiana Supreme Court , which voted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ five votes came from while male board members , while the sole dissenting vote came from Bernette J. Johnson , the state ’ s first Black Chief Justice , who called for a review of the case .
In her opinion , Chief Justice Johnson blasted the sentence as completely disproportionate to the crime , noting that Bryant ’ s sentence had already cost taxpayers $ 518,667 .
“ Harsh habitual offender laws … permit a life sentence for a Black man convicted of property crimes , ” Johnson wrote .
“ This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ failed attempt to steal a set of hedge clippers is grossly out of proportion to the crime and serves no legitimate penal purpose.
” If he lives another 20 years , Louisiana taxpayers will have paid almost one million dollars to punish Mr. Bryant for his failed effort to steal a set of hedge clippers , ” she added .
Additionally , she described his past criminal offenses as the sort of “ petty theft ” rooted in the “ ravages of poverty or addiction.
” She also blasted the state ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the racist Black Codes and “ Pig Laws ” that unjustly penalized poor Black people for crimes like stealing farm animals or being unemployed , while also treating common misdemeanors and trivial offenses as felonies .
In Mississippi , “ pig laws ” meant that any theft of property over $ 10 was enhanced to grand larceny .
As a result of the “ pig laws , ” the prison population quadrupled .
On Thursday , the Committee on Parole voted unanimously to release him by a vote of 3-0 .
Bryant will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ due to his history of drug and alcohol abuse , and he must also perform community service and adhere to a curfew .
Louisiana State University ( LSU ) Professor Robert Lancaster , director of the LSU Parole and Re-entry Clinic , represented Bryant during the hearing .
Bryant was also assisted by Kelsey Jenkins , a third-year LSU Law student who helped Lancaster draft a memo that was submitted in support of early release .
“ Mr .
Bryant ’ s sentence is an example of the flaws in Louisiana ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Committee ’ s decision to grant him early release shows the importance of periodic evaluation of an individual ’ s rehabilitation , which Mr. Bryant will continue with the support of the Louisiana Parole Project , Inc. , ” wrote Jenkins .
Rights defenders such as the American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana hailed the decision as long overdue .
“ Now it is imperative that the Legislature repeal the habitual offender law that allows for these unfair sentences , and for district attorneys across the state to immediately stop seeking extreme penalties @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ACLU executive director Alanah Odoms in an emailed statement .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Elias Marat
A man who was serving a life sentence in Louisiana for stealing hedge clippers from someone’s garage in 1997 has been granted parole after spending 23 years in prison.
Fair Wayne Bryant, 63, was facing life behind bars due to the attempted burglary conviction and his criminal record. However, the state’s draconian habitual offender laws led to Bryant’s harsh sentence.
Bryant’s life sentence became the subject of withering criticism from civil liberties advocates and the chief justice of Louisiana’s Supreme Court, who called the sentence “cruel and unusual” and a legacy of slavery and racism in the Southern state.
According to Bryant’s parole panel, Bryant’s criminal record consisted of 22 arrests and 11 convictions. The past convictions included four felonies, only one of which was for a violent crime – an attempted armed robbery of a taxi driver in 1979.
In 1997, Bryant was driving when his car stalled and he went into somebody’s garage looking for a tank of gas. At that point, he was encountered and attempted to flee on foot.
When police apprehended him, he was accused of having stolen a pair of hedge clippers that were found in his vehicle, a claim that he denied. Evidence suggested that he had, however, intended to commit theft. Bryant’s previous criminal record and the state’s harsh repeat offender laws led to him receiving a life sentence, which he tried to appeal for the next 23 years.
Two months ago, Bryant’s case appeared before the Louisiana Supreme Court, which voted 5-1 to reject the appeal. The five votes came from while male board members, while the sole dissenting vote came from Bernette J. Johnson, the state’s first Black Chief Justice, who called for a review of the case.
In her opinion, Chief Justice Johnson blasted the sentence as completely disproportionate to the crime, noting that Bryant’s sentence had already cost taxpayers $518,667.
“Harsh habitual offender laws … permit a life sentence for a Black man convicted of property crimes,” Johnson wrote. “This man’s life sentence for a failed attempt to steal a set of hedge clippers is grossly out of proportion to the crime and serves no legitimate penal purpose.”
If he lives another 20 years, Louisiana taxpayers will have paid almost one million dollars to punish Mr. Bryant for his failed effort to steal a set of hedge clippers,” she added.
Additionally, she described his past criminal offenses as the sort of “petty theft” rooted in the “ravages of poverty or addiction.”
She also blasted the state’s notorious repeat offender law as similar to the racist Black Codes and “Pig Laws” that unjustly penalized poor Black people for crimes like stealing farm animals or being unemployed, while also treating common misdemeanors and trivial offenses as felonies. In Mississippi, “pig laws” meant that any theft of property over $10 was enhanced to grand larceny. As a result of the “pig laws,” the prison population quadrupled.
On Thursday, the Committee on Parole voted unanimously to release him by a vote of 3-0. Bryant will be required to attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings due to his history of drug and alcohol abuse, and he must also perform community service and adhere to a curfew.
Louisiana State University (LSU) Professor Robert Lancaster, director of the LSU Parole and Re-entry Clinic, represented Bryant during the hearing. Bryant was also assisted by Kelsey Jenkins, a third-year LSU Law student who helped Lancaster draft a memo that was submitted in support of early release.
“Mr. Bryant’s sentence is an example of the flaws in Louisiana’s criminal legal system, but the Parole Committee’s decision to grant him early release shows the importance of periodic evaluation of an individual’s rehabilitation, which Mr. Bryant will continue with the support of the Louisiana Parole Project, Inc.,” wrote Jenkins.
Rights defenders such as the American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana hailed the decision as long overdue.
“Now it is imperative that the Legislature repeal the habitual offender law that allows for these unfair sentences, and for district attorneys across the state to immediately stop seeking extreme penalties for minor offenses,” said Louisiana ACLU executive director Alanah Odoms in an emailed statement.
Source: The Mind Unleashed
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-10-18--Balchik, Bulgaria Bans Construction of 5G Network

There ARE studies that have already determined 5G is NOT safe .
The majority of scientists worldwide oppose it until there are studies proving it isn ’ t unsafe .
Doctors and scientists have also asked for 5G moratoriums on on Earth and in space ( see 1 , 2 ) .
Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban , delay , halt , and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums on deployment .
This now includes Balchik , Bulgaria .
Balchik Municipality in Bulgaria Imposes Moratorium on Construction of 5G network Balchik is the first municipality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a 5G network .
On 30 September the local municipal council imposed a one-year moratorium on the construction of any such installations , Pro News Dobrich website reports .
The decision comes as a result of a petition in which the signees state they do not want a 5G network because of “ health risks.
” Over 500 cities in Italy have passed resolutions to halt 5G until safety research has been completed .
Ormidia community council in Cyprus has declared their village a 5G free zone .
The Pancyprian Medical Association @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Child Health position paper on 5G is entitled “ The Risks to Public Health from the Use of the 5G Network ” and was sent to the Cyprus Parliamentary Committees on Environment and Health .
In the United States , Hawaii County passed a resolution to halt 5G as well as Farragut Tennessee and Easton Connecticut .
Entire countries like France , Switzerland , and Nigeria are having a national conversation on the safety of 5G and they are launching major investigations to research the issue of safety .
( Details HERE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as Petaluma , Mill Valley , Monterey in California , and Doylestown in Pennsylvania have voted and passed policies to halt 5G or restrict the rollout into neighborhoods .
Details HERE .
Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses after 5G has been installed ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) .
Of course , exposure to other sources of Electromagnetic Radiation – including 1G thru 4G – can cause this too .
In fact , last year the World Health Organization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( aka “ Electrosmog ” ) could cause health issues in a significant percentage of the population .
Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology .
For more information visit our archives and the following websites .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
There ARE studies that have already determined 5G is NOT safe. The majority of scientists worldwide oppose it until there are studies proving it isn’t unsafe. Doctors and scientists have also asked for 5G moratoriums on on Earth and in space (see 1, 2). Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums on deployment. This now includes Balchik, Bulgaria.
From Environmental Health Trust:
Balchik Municipality in Bulgaria Imposes Moratorium on Construction of 5G network Balchik is the first municipality in Bulgaria to have banned the construction of a 5G network. On 30 September the local municipal council imposed a one-year moratorium on the construction of any such installations, Pro News Dobrich website reports. The decision comes as a result of a petition in which the signees state they do not want a 5G network because of “health risks.” Report from https://bnr.bg/en/post/101352141/balchik-municipality-imposes-moratorium-on-construction-of-5g-network Over 500 cities in Italy have passed resolutions to halt 5G until safety research has been completed. Ormidia community council in Cyprus has declared their village a 5G free zone. The Pancyprian Medical Association and Cyprus National Committee on the Environment and Child Health position paper on 5G is entitled “The Risks to Public Health from the Use of the 5G Network” and was sent to the Cyprus Parliamentary Committees on Environment and Health. In the United States, Hawaii County passed a resolution to halt 5G as well as Farragut Tennessee and Easton Connecticut. Entire countries like France, Switzerland, and Nigeria are having a national conversation on the safety of 5G and they are launching major investigations to research the issue of safety. (Details HERE) In the United States, cities such as Petaluma, Mill Valley, Monterey in California, and Doylestown in Pennsylvania have voted and passed policies to halt 5G or restrict the rollout into neighborhoods. Details HERE.
Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses after 5G has been installed (see 1, 2, 3, 4). Of course, exposure to other sources of Electromagnetic Radiation – including 1G thru 4G – can cause this too. In fact, last year the World Health Organization warned that high levels of Electromagnetic Fields (aka “Electrosmog”) could cause health issues in a significant percentage of the population.
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-10-18--“A Truly Orwellian Culture” — Amazon Removes COVID Skeptic’s Book For Violating Content Guidelines

Around the time Twitter purged New York Post ’ s bombshell stories about Hunter Biden from its platform , late last week , Amazon was busy censoring any criticism against the “ official ” COVID-19 narrative , with the banning of at least one book from its Amazon Books store .
Political writer James Perloff ’ s latest book , Covid-19 and the Agendas to Come : Red-Pilled , was removed from Amazon on Thursday , he tweeted .
“ BAD NEWS .
After selling over 3,500 copies for Amazon since publication on August 20 , Amazon has banned my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Come , Red-Pilled.
” Individual orders can still be placed at… ” Perloff tweeted .
Book : Covid-19 and the Agendas to Come : Red-Pilled Perloff spoke with RT News about the incident and outlined how Amazon ’ s act of censorship validates his book ’ s findings , expressing concern that “ the censorship on Covid has been getting progressively stronger , even as the death rate from Covid has been getting progressively lower.
” Perloff said Amazon contacted him on Thursday , asking him to “ clarify [ his ] rights @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said was already completed in August when the book went up for sale on the e-commerce platform .
As RT explains : He then “ asked them [ Amazon ] to specify what guidelines [ he ] had violated , ” they responded that the book violated “ our content guidelines.
” Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
After that , Amazon deleted the book from its platform .
Using an embedded link on Perloff ’ s website , directing people to purchase the book on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clicking on the link , that the Amazon page selling the book no longer exists .
According to RT , and perhaps why Amazon removed the book , is that it “ traces how the Covid-19 pandemic has been used by governments around the world to force draconian social control measures upon a terrified populace , evaluates several theories regarding the virus ’ origin , and offers some projections about what might lie ahead for humanity – including how populations might work together to avoid some of the most totalitarian outcomes.
” Perloff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of references via scholarly journals and other top sources : RT ’ s Helen Buyniski , who wrote the story on Perloff ’ s book ban , tweeted that “ Bezos nuking his new book exposing the COVID19 New Normal as a global Police State – forewarned is fore-armed , as they say.
” From social media to e-commerce sites , banning alternative views or maybe even the truth , in some cases , if it goes against the official narrative , has become the new normal as America descends deeper into an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hear more about the book , Perloff was recently on a podcast , uploaded to YouTube , discussing how “ COVID is threatening to destroy America.
” Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Tyler Durden
Around the time Twitter purged New York Post’s bombshell stories about Hunter Biden from its platform, late last week, Amazon was busy censoring any criticism against the “official” COVID-19 narrative, with the banning of at least one book from its Amazon Books store.
Political writer James Perloff’s latest book, Covid-19 and the Agendas to Come: Red-Pilled, was removed from Amazon on Thursday, he tweeted.
“BAD NEWS. After selling over 3,500 copies for Amazon since publication on August 20, Amazon has banned my book “COVID-19 and the Agendas to Come, Red-Pilled.” Individual orders can still be placed at…” Perloff tweeted.
Book: Covid-19 and the Agendas to Come: Red-Pilled
Perloff spoke with RT News about the incident and outlined how Amazon’s act of censorship validates his book’s findings, expressing concern that “the censorship on Covid has been getting progressively stronger, even as the death rate from Covid has been getting progressively lower.”
“We are in a truly Orwellian culture,” he warned.
Perloff said Amazon contacted him on Thursday, asking him to “clarify [his] rights to the book” – something he said was already completed in August when the book went up for sale on the e-commerce platform. As RT explains:
“But before he could finish gathering the material required to prove once again that he owned the global rights to his own work, he received another email from Amazon, this time claiming they had removed his book “during a quality assurance review of [his] catalog” because it “violated content guidelines.””
Amazon’s Response To Perloff
He then “asked them [Amazon] to specify what guidelines [he] had violated,” they responded that the book violated “our content guidelines.”
“We reserve the right to determine whether content provides a poor customer experience and remove the content from the sale,” Amazon said.
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
After that, Amazon deleted the book from its platform. Using an embedded link on Perloff’s website, directing people to purchase the book on Amazon, one can see below by clicking on the link, that the Amazon page selling the book no longer exists.
According to RT, and perhaps why Amazon removed the book, is that it “traces how the Covid-19 pandemic has been used by governments around the world to force draconian social control measures upon a terrified populace, evaluates several theories regarding the virus’ origin, and offers some projections about what might lie ahead for humanity – including how populations might work together to avoid some of the most totalitarian outcomes.”
Perloff said the book is sourced with hundreds of references via scholarly journals and other top sources:
“There is nothing I say in the book that isn’t documented,” he said, pointing out that several other coronavirus dissenters are selling their books on the platform without incident.
RT’s Helen Buyniski, who wrote the story on Perloff’s book ban, tweeted that “Bezos nuking his new book exposing the COVID19 New Normal as a global Police State – forewarned is fore-armed, as they say.”
From social media to e-commerce sites, banning alternative views or maybe even the truth, in some cases, if it goes against the official narrative, has become the new normal as America descends deeper into an Orwellian state.
If readers want to hear more about the book, Perloff was recently on a podcast, uploaded to YouTube, discussing how “COVID is threatening to destroy America.”
Source: Zerohedge
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-10-20--For Journalists in Kenya, “2020 is the worst year on record”

Since the novel coronavirus outbreak in Kenya in March , more than 47 cases of arbitrary arrest , assault and harassment have been perpetrated against bloggers , online activists and human rights defenders , according to ARTICLE 19 , a nongovernmental organization focused on freedom of expression .
This compares to 15 cases in the previous five months ( October 2019-March 2020 ) .
“ For online activists and journalists in Kenya , 2020 is the worst year on record , ” said James Wamathai , director of the Bloggers Association of Kenya ( BAKE ) .
“ The environment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic .
I think it is a concerted effort on the part of the government to silence dissenting voices.
” Wamathai believes the crackdown is opportunism on the part of the Kenyan government .
In most cases , online activists or bloggers are accused of publishing false information on COVID-19-related posts .
All of the bloggers and activists identified are known to have previously posted material critical of the government .
In June , veteran online social justice activist Mutemi wa Kiama was taken from his home by police .
Though he was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ filed at a local court revealed investigators intended to charge him with publishing false information under the cybercrimes law , which can result in fines or detention .
ARTICLE 19 says the aggressive actions taken against freedom of expression online in Kenya is of great concern and is part of a wider regional trend of a systematic and aggressive crackdown on critical narratives online .
ARTICLE 19 Eastern Africa is concerned that the government seems to be using the coronavirus outbreak as an opportunity to further entrench repressive measures .
Police must thoroughly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , like other essential service providers , should be allowed to access and report freely and accurately on the government ’ s actions to counter the effects and the spread of the coronavirus .
Such measures , he warned , further entrench a culture of intimidation that has persisted in Kenya for decades .
For female activists and journalists , the situation is particularly critical , with many experiencing malicious cyberbullying campaigns .
The African Development Bank has suggested that women in Africa are 27 times more likely than men to be harassed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sexualized and had my physical appearance attacked .
Some have even attacked my family online , ” human rights defender Wanjeri Nderu explains .
“ We need digital protection training , or we will continue to see women ’ s voices muted.
” Journalists in Kenya are concerned that , as the pandemic continues and reliance on social media for connectivity grows , online crackdowns may become more frequent and hostile .
“ The government feels it is losing control and wants to reclaim the online space , ” Nderu says .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bloggers or online users paid by the government to malign online activists.
” In response to Nderu ’ s comments , Kenya ’ s cabinet secretary for ICT , innovation and youth affairs , Joe Mucheru , told ARTICLE 19 : Note : This story was written by Victoria Rubaridi as part of the UK government-funded PROTECT project for ARTICLE 19 and is published here through a partnership-sharing agreement .
Image : An empty Nairobi street in Nairobi , Kenya , during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic , April 22 , 2020 .
Photo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0 .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Victoria Rubadiri
Since the novel coronavirus outbreak in Kenya in March, more than 47 cases of arbitrary arrest, assault and harassment have been perpetrated against bloggers, online activists and human rights defenders, according to ARTICLE 19, a nongovernmental organization focused on freedom of expression. This compares to 15 cases in the previous five months (October 2019-March 2020).
“For online activists and journalists in Kenya, 2020 is the worst year on record,” said James Wamathai, director of the Bloggers Association of Kenya (BAKE). “The environment has grown much more hostile during the pandemic. I think it is a concerted effort on the part of the government to silence dissenting voices.”
Wamathai believes the crackdown is opportunism on the part of the Kenyan government. In most cases, online activists or bloggers are accused of publishing false information on COVID-19-related posts. All of the bloggers and activists identified are known to have previously posted material critical of the government.
In June, veteran online social justice activist Mutemi wa Kiama was taken from his home by police. Though he was later released without charge, an affidavit filed at a local court revealed investigators intended to charge him with publishing false information under the cybercrimes law, which can result in fines or detention.
Kiama told ARTICLE 19:
I retweeted a thread that gave a history of how power and capital was passed down from colonial chiefs to the current political brokers. It went viral and that didn’t sit well with some individuals.
ARTICLE 19 says the aggressive actions taken against freedom of expression online in Kenya is of great concern and is part of a wider regional trend of a systematic and aggressive crackdown on critical narratives online.
Mugambi Kiai, regional director of ARTICLE 19 Eastern Africa, said:
ARTICLE 19 Eastern Africa is concerned that the government seems to be using the coronavirus outbreak as an opportunity to further entrench repressive measures. Police must thoroughly investigate and prosecute the perpetrators. Journalists, like other essential service providers, should be allowed to access and report freely and accurately on the government’s actions to counter the effects and the spread of the coronavirus.
Human rights lawyer Victor Kapiyo agrees:
We are seeing a weaponization of the law with offenses such as publication of false information, which one would imagine is an attempt to deal with fake news, but in reality, they are used to silence people who are critical of government.
Such measures, he warned, further entrench a culture of intimidation that has persisted in Kenya for decades.
Focus on female journalists and activists
For female activists and journalists, the situation is particularly critical, with many experiencing malicious cyberbullying campaigns. The African Development Bank has suggested that women in Africa are 27 times more likely than men to be harassed online.
“I’ve been sexualized and had my physical appearance attacked. Some have even attacked my family online,” human rights defender Wanjeri Nderu explains. “We need digital protection training, or we will continue to see women’s voices muted.”
Journalists in Kenya are concerned that, as the pandemic continues and reliance on social media for connectivity grows, online crackdowns may become more frequent and hostile.
“The government feels it is losing control and wants to reclaim the online space,” Nderu says. “We have seen arrests, but also bloggers or online users paid by the government to malign online activists.”
In response to Nderu’s comments, Kenya’s cabinet secretary for ICT, innovation and youth affairs, Joe Mucheru, told ARTICLE 19:
Our only agenda, when we communicate on social media, is to inform the public on development projects as well as security and health matters that will assist them.
Note: This story was written by Victoria Rubaridi as part of the UK government-funded PROTECT project for ARTICLE 19 and is published here through a partnership-sharing agreement.
Image: An empty Nairobi street in Nairobi, Kenya, during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic, April 22, 2020. Photo by the World Bank/Sambrian Mbaabu via Flickr CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0.
Source: GlobalVoices.org
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-10-19--Court Records Show Google Gives Keyword Searches of Innocent People to Cops

Everyone reading this knows that there are few things on the internet more revealing than their internet search data .
It is for this reason that police must seek out a warrant for an actual suspect in order to obtain said data .
However , a recently unsealed court document found that government can request such data in reverse order by asking Google to disclose everyone who searched a keyword rather than for information on a known suspect .
To spell it out more clearly , authorities can simply pick a search term and construct a warrant around it without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being a suspect in a crime , and then Google will simply over their data .
What could possibly go wrong ?
The court files in question that exposed this Orwellian nightmare are from the arrest of Michael Williams , an associate of singer and accused sex offender R. Kelly , for allegedly setting fire to a witness ’ car in Florida .
Authorities told Google that they needed information on all “ users who had searched the address of the residence close in time to the arson.
” As CNET reports , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ addresses of people who searched for the arson victim ’ s address , which investigators tied to a phone number belonging to Williams .
Police then used the phone number records to pinpoint the location of Williams ’ device near the arson , according to court documents .
While this instance may not seem too intrusive to some , consider the fact of how easily the state was able to obtain search information on completely innocent people .
“ This ‘ keyword warrant ’ evades the Fourth Amendment checks on police surveillance , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project .
“ When a court authorizes a data dump of every person who searched for a specific term or address , it ’ s likely unconstitutional.
” Naturally , Google , whose been ensnared in controversy after controversy , released a statement claiming that they protect the privacy of its users — unless of course the government tells them to do otherwise .
“ We require a warrant and push to narrow the scope of these particular demands when overly broad , including by objecting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s director of law enforcement and information security , Richard Salgado , said in a statement .
“ These data demands represent less than 1 % of total warrants and a small fraction of the overall legal demands for user data that we currently receive.
” Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
The company then declined to disclose how many keyword warrants it received in the last three years .
So much for that transparency thing .
In Illinois , warrants like the one mentioned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ court to be a violation of the Fourth Amendment .
Authorities in Illinois simply told Google that they needed all the historical information about what devices were at certain locations and they received all of it — including the data from the countless innocent people who visited these same locations and google handed it over .
Luckily , there are still some members of government who see the ominous nature of police having such easy access to this data .
Todd Spodek , the attorney representing Williams , says he ’ s seen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years and worries that they could lead to the arrest of innocent people .
“ Think of the ramifications in the future if everyone who searched something in the privacy of their own home was subject to interviews by federal agents , ” Spodek said .
“ Someone could be interested in how people die a certain way or how drug deals are done , and it could be misconstrued or used improperly.
” Indeed , the complete lack of probable cause in these warrants is shocking .
A tyrannical state who wanted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peacefully — could turn over one of these keyword warrants to Google and entire activist populations could be categorically rooted out and subject to invasive searches , arrests , or worse .
While it is the state asking for this information , it is Google that is storing in such a way that creates a unique profile on billions of users .
“ If Google stored data in a way that was truly de-identified , then they also couldn ’ t give it to the government , ” the Electronic Frontier Foundation ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Google ’ s not setting up their system or changing their practices in a way that could prevent these kinds of searches.
” In fact , they are actually building their system to facilitate this very thing .
As TFTP has reported , the information Facebook and other social media companies keep on its users is utterly mind-blowing , consisting of everything from text messages to liked posts , the social media giant is building profiles on billions .
However , this is nothing compared to what Google has .
Google @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stores your location ( if you have location tracking turned on ) every time you turn on your phone .
You can see a timeline of where you ’ ve been from the very first day you started using Google on your phone .
Click on this link to see your own data : google.com/maps/timeline ?
… Google knows everything you ’ ve ever searched – and deleted Google stores search history across all your devices .
That can mean that , even if you delete your search history and phone history on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data saved from other devices .
Click on this link to see your own data : myactivity.google.com/myactivity Google has an advertisement profile of you Google creates an advertisement profile based on your information , including your location , gender , age , hobbies , career , interests , relationship status , possible weight ( need to lose 10lb in one day ? )
and income .
Click on this link to see your own data : google.com/settings/ads/ Google knows all the apps you use Google stores information on every app and extension you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use them , where you use them , and who you use them to interact with .
That means they know who you talk to on Facebook , what countries are you speaking with , what time you go to sleep .
Click on this link to see your own data : security.google.com/settings/secur… Google has all of your YouTube history Google stores all of your YouTube history , so they probably know whether you ’ re going to be a parent soon , if you ’ re a conservative , if you ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re Jewish , Christian , or Muslim , if you ’ re feeling depressed or suicidal , if you ’ re anorexic … Click on this link to see your own data : youtube.com/feed/history/s… The data Google has on you can fill millions of Word documents Google offers an option to download all of the data it stores about you .
I ’ ve requested to download it and the file is 5.5GB big , which is roughly 3m Word documents .
This link includes your bookmarks , emails , contacts , your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ above information , your YouTube videos , the photos you ’ ve taken on your phone , the businesses you ’ ve bought from , the products you ’ ve bought through Google … They also have data from your calendar , your Google hangout sessions , your location history , the music you listen to , the Google books you ’ ve purchased , the Google groups you ’ re in , the websites you ’ ve created , the phones you ’ ve owned , the pages you ’ ve shared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a day … Click on this link to see your own data : google.com/takeout Google knows every image you ’ ve ever downloaded and where you accessed them .
They also know what events you ’ ve attended and when—even when you don ’ t enter them in your own calendar .
What ’ s more , even if you ’ ve deleted all this information , Google still has it !
But that ’ s not all .
They also have every email you ’ ve ever sent and received , including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a record of every single website you ’ ve ever visited , every search you ’ ve ever done , every app you ’ ve ever used , and every news article you ’ ve ever read .
As web developer Dylan Curran , based in Waterford , Ireland , pointed out : If we continue to be okay with unknown corporate entities watching our every move , collecting every bit of our personal information , and using all of it against us in unconstitutional agreements with the government , the words “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ become but a fleeting memory .
While you may think you have nothing to hide if you ’ ve done nothing wrong , it ’ s only a matter of time before someone deems your completely legal behavior a threat—and uses this massive spy tool to stop that threat .
Now for the solution .
Stop giving Google all these permissions , go through your device ’ s permissions and disable everything that may let Google collect your information .
Stop letting Google record you by disabling the voice recognition .
Use browsers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t spy on you .
Use search engines like DuckDuckgo.com .
Use VPNs and quit paying for internet services that allow third-parties to collect your information .
Unless we reclaim our privacy now , we will be responsible for the insane information dystopia that we create .
Please share this article as Google will likely make sure it does not make the front page of its search engine .
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA .
This prior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world of government corruption and the American police state .
Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world .
Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project .
Follow @ MattAgorist on Twitter , Steemit , and now on Minds .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Matt Agorist
Everyone reading this knows that there are few things on the internet more revealing than their internet search data. It is for this reason that police must seek out a warrant for an actual suspect in order to obtain said data. However, a recently unsealed court document found that government can request such data in reverse order by asking Google to disclose everyone who searched a keyword rather than for information on a known suspect.
To spell it out more clearly, authorities can simply pick a search term and construct a warrant around it without anyone being accused of a crime or being a suspect in a crime, and then Google will simply over their data. What could possibly go wrong?
The court files in question that exposed this Orwellian nightmare are from the arrest of Michael Williams, an associate of singer and accused sex offender R. Kelly, for allegedly setting fire to a witness’ car in Florida.
Authorities told Google that they needed information on all “users who had searched the address of the residence close in time to the arson.”
As CNET reports, documents showed that Google provided the IP addresses of people who searched for the arson victim’s address, which investigators tied to a phone number belonging to Williams. Police then used the phone number records to pinpoint the location of Williams’ device near the arson, according to court documents.
While this instance may not seem too intrusive to some, consider the fact of how easily the state was able to obtain search information on completely innocent people.
“This ‘keyword warrant’ evades the Fourth Amendment checks on police surveillance,” said Albert Fox Cahn, the executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project. “When a court authorizes a data dump of every person who searched for a specific term or address, it’s likely unconstitutional.”
CNET reports:
The keyword warrants are similar to geofence warrants, in which police make requests to Google for data on all devices logged in at a specific area and time. Google received 15 times more geofence warrant requests in 2018 compared with 2017, and five times more in 2019 than 2018. The rise in reverse requests from police have troubled Google staffers, according to internal emails.
Naturally, Google, whose been ensnared in controversy after controversy, released a statement claiming that they protect the privacy of its users — unless of course the government tells them to do otherwise.
“We require a warrant and push to narrow the scope of these particular demands when overly broad, including by objecting in court when appropriate,” Google’s director of law enforcement and information security, Richard Salgado, said in a statement. “These data demands represent less than 1% of total warrants and a small fraction of the overall legal demands for user data that we currently receive.”
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
The company then declined to disclose how many keyword warrants it received in the last three years. So much for that transparency thing.
In Illinois, warrants like the one mentioned above have already been found by federal court to be a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Authorities in Illinois simply told Google that they needed all the historical information about what devices were at certain locations and they received all of it — including the data from the countless innocent people who visited these same locations and google handed it over. Luckily, there are still some members of government who see the ominous nature of police having such easy access to this data.
Todd Spodek, the attorney representing Williams, says he’s seen a bunch of these warrants over the years and worries that they could lead to the arrest of innocent people.
“Think of the ramifications in the future if everyone who searched something in the privacy of their own home was subject to interviews by federal agents,” Spodek said. “Someone could be interested in how people die a certain way or how drug deals are done, and it could be misconstrued or used improperly.”
Indeed, the complete lack of probable cause in these warrants is shocking. A tyrannical state who wanted to identify those who oppose it — peacefully — could turn over one of these keyword warrants to Google and entire activist populations could be categorically rooted out and subject to invasive searches, arrests, or worse.
While it is the state asking for this information, it is Google that is storing in such a way that creates a unique profile on billions of users.
“If Google stored data in a way that was truly de-identified, then they also couldn’t give it to the government,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s surveillance litigation director Jennifer Lynch said. “Google’s not setting up their system or changing their practices in a way that could prevent these kinds of searches.”
In fact, they are actually building their system to facilitate this very thing.
As TFTP has reported, the information Facebook and other social media companies keep on its users is utterly mind-blowing, consisting of everything from text messages to liked posts, the social media giant is building profiles on billions. However, this is nothing compared to what Google has.
Google knows where you’ve been
Google stores your location (if you have location tracking turned on) every time you turn on your phone. You can see a timeline of where you’ve been from the very first day you started using Google on your phone.
Click on this link to see your own data: google.com/maps/timeline?…
Google knows everything you’ve ever searched – and deleted
Google stores search history across all your devices. That can mean that, even if you delete your search history and phone history on one device, it may still have data saved from other devices.
Click on this link to see your own data: myactivity.google.com/myactivity
Google has an advertisement profile of you
Google creates an advertisement profile based on your information, including your location, gender, age, hobbies, career, interests, relationship status, possible weight (need to lose 10lb in one day?) and income.
Click on this link to see your own data: google.com/settings/ads/
Google knows all the apps you use
Google stores information on every app and extension you use. They know how often you use them, where you use them, and who you use them to interact with. That means they know who you talk to on Facebook, what countries are you speaking with, what time you go to sleep.
Click on this link to see your own data: security.google.com/settings/secur…
Google has all of your YouTube history
Google stores all of your YouTube history, so they probably know whether you’re going to be a parent soon, if you’re a conservative, if you’re a progressive, if you’re Jewish, Christian, or Muslim, if you’re feeling depressed or suicidal, if you’re anorexic …
Click on this link to see your own data: youtube.com/feed/history/s…
The data Google has on you can fill millions of Word documents
Google offers an option to download all of the data it stores about you. I’ve requested to download it and the file is 5.5GB big, which is roughly 3m Word documents.
Manage to gain access to someone’s Google account? Perfect, you have a diary of everything that person has done.
This link includes your bookmarks, emails, contacts, your Google Drive files, all of the above information, your YouTube videos, the photos you’ve taken on your phone, the businesses you’ve bought from, the products you’ve bought through Google …
They also have data from your calendar, your Google hangout sessions, your location history, the music you listen to, the Google books you’ve purchased, the Google groups you’re in, the websites you’ve created, the phones you’ve owned, the pages you’ve shared, how many steps you walk in a day …
Click on this link to see your own data: google.com/takeout
Google knows every image you’ve ever downloaded and where you accessed them. They also know what events you’ve attended and when—even when you don’t enter them in your own calendar.
What’s more, even if you’ve deleted all this information, Google still has it!
But that’s not all. They also have every email you’ve ever sent and received, including deleted ones and spam. They have a record of every single website you’ve ever visited, every search you’ve ever done, every app you’ve ever used, and every news article you’ve ever read.
As web developer Dylan Curran, based in Waterford, Ireland, pointed out:
This information has millions of nefarious uses. You say you’re not a terrorist. Then how come you were googling Isis? Work at Google and you’re suspicious of your wife? Perfect, just look up her location and search history for the last 10 years. Manage to gain access to someone’s Google account? Perfect, you have a chronological diary of everything that person has done for the last 10 years. This is one of the craziest things about the modern age. We would never let the government or a corporation put cameras/microphones in our homes or location trackers on us. But we just went ahead and did it ourselves because – to hell with it! – I want to watch cute dog videos.
If we continue to be okay with unknown corporate entities watching our every move, collecting every bit of our personal information, and using all of it against us in unconstitutional agreements with the government, the words “freedom” and “privacy” will become but a fleeting memory.
While you may think you have nothing to hide if you’ve done nothing wrong, it’s only a matter of time before someone deems your completely legal behavior a threat—and uses this massive spy tool to stop that threat.
Now for the solution. Stop giving Google all these permissions, go through your device’s permissions and disable everything that may let Google collect your information. Stop letting Google record you by disabling the voice recognition. Use browsers like Firefox or TOR or Brave that don’t spy on you. Use search engines like DuckDuckgo.com. Use VPNs and quit paying for internet services that allow third-parties to collect your information.
Unless we reclaim our privacy now, we will be responsible for the insane information dystopia that we create. Please share this article as Google will likely make sure it does not make the front page of its search engine.
Source: The Free Thought Project
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Minds.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-10-19--Natural Resources Defense Council: The FCC “Has Failed to Protect the Public from Radiofrequency Emi

Natural Resources Defense Council: The FCC “Has Failed to Protect the Public from Radiofrequency Emissions”

The Federal Communications Commission ( FCC ) is not a health or environmental agency .
In the 1990s , they replaced the EPA as the regulatory body appointed to protect Americans from the telecom industry .
Unfortunately , they HAVE catered to the industry instead AND they have become more dangerous since Trump was elected ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ) .
Despite research proving harm , the agency refuses to update 24-year-old federal RF radiation exposure guidelines .
Lawsuits have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the public from unsafe levels of radiation as well as 5G on Earth ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) and in space .
Environmental Health Trust and Natural Resources Defense Council ( NRDC ) are two organizations that have filed .
In a recent newsletter , Environmental Health Trust draws attention to this : The National Resources Defense Counsel ( NRDC ) submitted a must read Amicus Brief supporting our historic lawsuit against the Federal Communications Commission ( FCC ) .
In fact , four incredible amicus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ et al.
, v. FCC and each one eloquently describes why the FCC must revise its decades-old outdated wireless radiation limits .
Each one is a treasure .
We are so thankful to NRDC , the Building Biology Institute , Attorney Joe Sandri , Dan and Catherine Kleiber , and all the public officials who took the time to share important information with the court .
And we are thankful to you for your sustaining support of our mission .
We want you to read their words “ The present FCC thermal regulation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific foundation , as pointed out by Petitioners , is perpetrating a continuing , ever-expanding , and cruel injustice.
” – Building Biology Institute “ Overall , the NTP findings demonstrate the potential for RFR to cause cancer in humans.
” – Dr. Linda Birnbaum , former director of the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program “ Because the FCC is not primarily a health care or an environmental protection agency it has a special duty to review the work of experts from those fields and also a duty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expert agencies .
… It does not appear that the FCC provided evidence that it met minimal requirements to review the record in this proceeding , let alone that it even wrote numerous agencies of subject matter expertise , seeking their input.
” – Attorney Joe Sandri “ The FCC is obligated to prepare an EIS ( environmental impact study ) due to both the differing environmental and public health impacts engendered by the choice between keeping RF/MW limits the same vs. lowering them and the vastly disparate energy footprint of wired vs. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future survival of the human race.
” – Dan and Catherine Kleiber “ The FCC stuck its head in the sand and did not even mention many of these studies of potential environmental harm in its 2019 order … As the 5G buildout continues , Americans are forced to live with involuntary 24/7 radiation.
” – National Resources Defense Counsel and elected officials from California , Maryland , Massachusetts and Hawaii .
High-speed internet CAN be obtained without 5G and even without wireless .
According to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai – and a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all Americans have paid to have this already .
There IS research that has determined 5G is NOT safe .
In fact , cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban , delay , halt , and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums on deployment .
In the U.S. 5G lawsuits have been filed by municipalities against the FCC .
Municipal legislators have passed resolutions to ban 5G until studies prove it ’ s safe ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ) and ordinances @ @ @ @ @ @ @ representatives in Hawaii and Illinois have introduced 5G bills to protect constituents .
Congress members have confronted the FCC with their concerns ( see 1 , 2 ) .
American opposition also includes federal agencies and other experts who warn 5G could threaten national security , public safety , and weather forecasting accuracy ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) .
The majority of scientists worldwide oppose 5G until there are studies proving it isn ’ t unsafe .
Doctors and scientists have asked for moratoriums on Earth and in space ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses after 5G was installed ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) .
However , exposure risks aren ’ t exclusive to 5G .
Last year the World Health Organization warned that high levels of Electromagnetic Fields ( aka “ Electrosmog ” ) could cause health issues in a significant percentage of the population .
Doctors and scientists – including the American Academy of Pediatrics – insist that exposure to ALL sources of wireless radiation is harmful ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The FCC continues deferring to industry-paid consultants and forcing unsafe and unwanted technology on Americans instead .
Trump seems to have bought into all of this as well .
So much for giving the country back to the people… Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology .
For more information visit our archives and the following websites .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is not a health or environmental agency. In the 1990s, they replaced the EPA as the regulatory body appointed to protect Americans from the telecom industry. Unfortunately, they HAVE catered to the industry instead AND they have become more dangerous since Trump was elected (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). Despite research proving harm, the agency refuses to update 24-year-old federal RF radiation exposure guidelines.
Lawsuits have been filed against the FCC for NOT protecting the public from unsafe levels of radiation as well as 5G on Earth (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and in space. Environmental Health Trust and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) are two organizations that have filed. In a recent newsletter, Environmental Health Trust draws attention to this:
The National Resources Defense Counsel (NRDC) submitted a must read Amicus Brief supporting our historic lawsuit against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
In fact, four incredible amicus briefs were filed in support of EHT et al., v. FCC and each one eloquently describes why the FCC must revise its decades-old outdated wireless radiation limits. Each one is a treasure.
We are so thankful to NRDC, the Building Biology Institute, Attorney Joe Sandri, Dan and Catherine Kleiber, and all the public officials who took the time to share important information with the court. And we are thankful to you for your sustaining support of our mission.
We want you to read their words
“The present FCC thermal regulation, in addition to lacking any sound scientific foundation, as pointed out by Petitioners, is perpetrating a continuing, ever-expanding, and cruel injustice.” – Building Biology Institute
“Overall, the NTP findings demonstrate the potential for RFR to cause cancer in humans.” – Dr. Linda Birnbaum, former director of the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program
“Because the FCC is not primarily a health care or an environmental protection agency it has a special duty to review the work of experts from those fields and also a duty to make written requests to the various expert agencies. … It does not appear that the FCC provided evidence that it met minimal requirements to review the record in this proceeding, let alone that it even wrote numerous agencies of subject matter expertise, seeking their input.” – Attorney Joe Sandri
“The FCC is obligated to prepare an EIS (environmental impact study) due to both the differing environmental and public health impacts engendered by the choice between keeping RF/MW limits the same vs. lowering them and the vastly disparate energy footprint of wired vs. wireless technologies and the implications for the future survival of the human race.” – Dan and Catherine Kleiber
“The FCC stuck its head in the sand and did not even mention many of these studies of potential environmental harm in its 2019 order … As the 5G buildout continues, Americans are forced to live with involuntary 24/7 radiation.” – National Resources Defense Counsel and elected officials from California, Maryland, Massachusetts and Hawaii.
Read All the Amicus Briefs
High-speed internet CAN be obtained without 5G and even without wireless. According to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai – and a different LAWSUIT filed against the agency – all Americans have paid to have this already.
There IS research that has determined 5G is NOT safe. In fact, cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums on deployment. In the U.S. 5G lawsuits have been filed by municipalities against the FCC.
Municipal legislators have passed resolutions to ban 5G until studies prove it’s safe (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) and ordinances to limit and/or control installation. State representatives in Hawaii and Illinois have introduced 5G bills to protect constituents. Congress members have confronted the FCC with their concerns (see 1, 2). American opposition also includes federal agencies and other experts who warn 5G could threaten national security, public safety, and weather forecasting accuracy (see 1, 2, 3).
The majority of scientists worldwide oppose 5G until there are studies proving it isn’t unsafe. Doctors and scientists have asked for moratoriums on Earth and in space (see 1, 2). Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses after 5G was installed (see 1, 2, 3, 4). However, exposure risks aren’t exclusive to 5G. Last year the World Health Organization warned that high levels of Electromagnetic Fields (aka “Electrosmog”) could cause health issues in a significant percentage of the population. Doctors and scientists – including the American Academy of Pediatrics – insist that exposure to ALL sources of wireless radiation is harmful (see also 1, 2). The FCC continues deferring to industry-paid consultants and forcing unsafe and unwanted technology on Americans instead. Trump seems to have bought into all of this as well. So much for giving the country back to the people…
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-10-19--Former OPCW Chief Says His Office Was Bugged While USA Pushed Iraq War

In an important new interview with The Grayzone ‘ s Aaron Maté , the first Director-General of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons ( OPCW ) has revealed new insights into the way the US exerted control over the Organisation in the lead-up to the Iraq invasion and the suspicious way pro-US narratives appear to be dominating controversies in the supposedly impartial OPCW to this day .
The most significant piece of new information revealed in this interview with the acclaimed former OPCW chief José Bustani is his assertion that while the US was orchestrating his 2002 ouster @ @ @ @ @ @ @ derailing the Iraq war agenda with successful negotiations , his office was packed with hidden surveillance equipment and that his American head of security vanished immediately after this was discovered .
After noticing suspicious phenomena and leaks coming out of his office , Bustani reports that he sent for a trusted security expert from outside the Organisation to investigate over the weekend .
“ The fact was that the wall behind my desk , the wall behind the desk of the Director-General was full of equipment , listening equipment , ” Bustani reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and removed everything , and there were bugs in the drawer , my desk , phone .
I was shocked I must say .
But he did it immediately .
It took him the whole of Saturday , half of the Sunday , he took it [ away ] , he removed everything and nobody realized except me and my wife .
On Monday when people came to my office , they were shocked with the way the wall was .
It was a big hole.
” “ And interesting thing is–and I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then a person that was the head of the security of the Organization , ” Bustani said .
“ He used to be an American .
He had a large office full of equipment .
I called him , the Monday after that happened , I called his office to check with him how come he didn ’ t know , he was in charge of security of the building , how come he didn ’ t know that there was such bugging equipment behind me .
And he wasn ’ t there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was traveling to Germany , and I asked then , ‘ Who allowed him to go to Germany ?
I am his direct boss .
He was my subordinate , he was directly subordinate to me.
’ Nobody could say anything .
So I said ‘ As soon as he returns tell him I want to have a word with him.
’ This was the Monday .
You will not believe it Aaron , but on Tuesday as I got to the OPCW I am told that I should go up to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ got there the office was empty , and this person disappeared and never showed up again .
Never showed up again.
” This is a major revelation .
When you ’ ve got an American infiltrator covertly surveilling a foreign official to advance US foreign policy agendas , what you have is a US spy .
We don ’ t know what agency that spy would have worked for , but what Bustani is describing is US espionage targeting an international watchdog organisation .
Bustani gave additional insights into the ongoing OPCW scandal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ implemented in the investigation of an alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma , Syria in 2018 which preceded airstrikes against the Assad government by the US , UK and France .
He stated emphatically that as Director-General he would “ never ” have allowed the Douma investigation team to be replaced with a “ core team ” who never went there or permitted a team of inspectors to meet with US officials during an active investigation , as reportedly happened after the Douma incident .
“ This would have never happened if I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked if he ’ d have allowed a US delegation to lobby them to come to a specified conclusion in their investigation .
“ The Inspectors know themselves that they can not .
They can not .
They are not supposed to meet with delegations on issues like inspections in particular .
I don ’ t know how it happened , maybe they were forced to or they were led to by… I don ’ t know how it in practice happened because if I were Director-General this would never happen.
” “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked if he ’ d have permitted a team of investigators to be replaced mid-investigation with another team who never visited the crime scene .
“ It would have never happened to me , unless there was a serious violation of the code of conduct on the part of the inspectors .
Which fortunately never , never happened.
” Bustani said he knew the whistleblowers who sparked the OPCW scandal from his time at the Organisation , and decried the way they are being smeared , silenced and their anonymity removed for simply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ methodology in the interest of protecting the OPCW ’ s legitimacy .
He voiced a great fondness for the Organisation and a grave concern for the suspicious abnormalities in its investigative practices involving the United States , and he expressed shock at the way the US , UK and France recently blocked him from offering comments to the UN about those concerns .
Maté pointed out that one highly suspect common denominator in both the current OPCW scandal and Bustani ’ s 2002 ouster is John Bolton .
As US ambassador Bolton is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arranging Bustani ’ s removal as Director-General to such an aggressive extent that he reportedly threatened Bustani ’ s children , and Bolton ’ s stint as Trump ’ s National Security Advisor began immediately before the 2018 airstrikes on Syria after the Douma incident .
Bolton claims to have played a role in planning those airstrikes and was active at the highest levels of the US government ’ s executive branch throughout the entirety of the OPCW Douma investigation .
The mountains of evidence that the US has been meddling in an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an act of war by the United States and its allies keeps stacking higher .
The way the US power alliance has been actively suppressing and avoiding that evidence is appalling , and the way the mass media have refused to report on this fact is even more so .
Thanks for reading !
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack , which will get you an email @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work is entirely reader-supported , so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around , liking me on Facebook , following my antics on Twitter , throwing some money into my tip jar on Patreon or Paypal , purchasing some of my sweet merchandise , buying my books Rogue Nation : Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone and Woke : A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers .
For more info on who I am , where I stand , and what I ’ m trying to do with this platform , click @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , has my permission to republish , use or translate any part of this work ( or anything else I ’ ve written ) in any way they like free of charge .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today @

By Caitlin Johnstone
In an important new interview with The Grayzone‘s Aaron Maté, the first Director-General of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has revealed new insights into the way the US exerted control over the Organisation in the lead-up to the Iraq invasion and the suspicious way pro-US narratives appear to be dominating controversies in the supposedly impartial OPCW to this day.
The most significant piece of new information revealed in this interview with the acclaimed former OPCW chief José Bustani is his assertion that while the US was orchestrating his 2002 ouster due to the risk he posed of derailing the Iraq war agenda with successful negotiations, his office was packed with hidden surveillance equipment and that his American head of security vanished immediately after this was discovered.
After noticing suspicious phenomena and leaks coming out of his office, Bustani reports that he sent for a trusted security expert from outside the Organisation to investigate over the weekend.
“The fact was that the wall behind my desk, the wall behind the desk of the Director-General was full of equipment, listening equipment,” Bustani reported. “He broke the whole wall and removed everything, and there were bugs in the drawer, my desk, phone. I was shocked I must say. But he did it immediately. It took him the whole of Saturday, half of the Sunday, he took it [away], he removed everything and nobody realized except me and my wife. On Monday when people came to my office, they were shocked with the way the wall was. It was a big hole.”
“And interesting thing is–and I never said this before–is that I had then a person that was the head of the security of the Organization,” Bustani said. “He used to be an American. He had a large office full of equipment. I called him, the Monday after that happened, I called his office to check with him how come he didn’t know, he was in charge of security of the building, how come he didn’t know that there was such bugging equipment behind me. And he wasn’t there. And I was told that he was traveling to Germany, and I asked then, ‘Who allowed him to go to Germany? I am his direct boss. He was my subordinate, he was directly subordinate to me.’ Nobody could say anything. So I said ‘As soon as he returns tell him I want to have a word with him.’ This was the Monday. You will not believe it Aaron, but on Tuesday as I got to the OPCW I am told that I should go up to the head of security office and when I got there the office was empty, and this person disappeared and never showed up again. Never showed up again.”
This is a major revelation. When you’ve got an American infiltrator covertly surveilling a foreign official to advance US foreign policy agendas, what you have is a US spy. We don’t know what agency that spy would have worked for, but what Bustani is describing is US espionage targeting an international watchdog organisation.
Bustani gave additional insights into the ongoing OPCW scandal surrounding the extremely suspicious practices that were implemented in the investigation of an alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma, Syria in 2018 which preceded airstrikes against the Assad government by the US, UK and France. He stated emphatically that as Director-General he would “never” have allowed the Douma investigation team to be replaced with a “core team” who never went there or permitted a team of inspectors to meet with US officials during an active investigation, as reportedly happened after the Douma incident.
“This would have never happened if I were Director-General,” Bustani said when asked if he’d have allowed a US delegation to lobby them to come to a specified conclusion in their investigation. “The Inspectors know themselves that they cannot. They cannot. They are not supposed to meet with delegations on issues like inspections in particular. I don’t know how it happened, maybe they were forced to or they were led to by… I don’t know how it in practice happened because if I were Director-General this would never happen.”
Ex-OPCW chief José Bustani on the fact that the OPCW inspectors who investigated the alleged chemical attack in Douma, Syria were sidelined and replaced with a so-called "core" team who never set foot there: "It would have never happened" under his watch. https://t.co/C6l24YkYdP pic.twitter.com/knPdl7Nh2U — Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) October 18, 2020
“Absolutely not,” Bustani said when asked if he’d have permitted a team of investigators to be replaced mid-investigation with another team who never visited the crime scene. “It would have never happened to me, unless there was a serious violation of the code of conduct on the part of the inspectors. Which fortunately never, never happened.”
Bustani said he knew the whistleblowers who sparked the OPCW scandal from his time at the Organisation, and decried the way they are being smeared, silenced and their anonymity removed for simply voicing objections to an investigation’s methodology in the interest of protecting the OPCW’s legitimacy. He voiced a great fondness for the Organisation and a grave concern for the suspicious abnormalities in its investigative practices involving the United States, and he expressed shock at the way the US, UK and France recently blocked him from offering comments to the UN about those concerns.
Maté pointed out that one highly suspect common denominator in both the current OPCW scandal and Bustani’s 2002 ouster is John Bolton. As US ambassador Bolton is known to have been actively involved in arranging Bustani’s removal as Director-General to such an aggressive extent that he reportedly threatened Bustani’s children, and Bolton’s stint as Trump’s National Security Advisor began immediately before the 2018 airstrikes on Syria after the Douma incident. Bolton claims to have played a role in planning those airstrikes and was active at the highest levels of the US government’s executive branch throughout the entirety of the OPCW Douma investigation.
The mountains of evidence that the US has been meddling in an investigation of an incident which led to an act of war by the United States and its allies keeps stacking higher. The way the US power alliance has been actively suppressing and avoiding that evidence is appalling, and the way the mass media have refused to report on this fact is even more so.
Former OPCW chief José Bustani on media silence over the OPCW Syria cover-up scandal, & how media coverage could make a difference in protecting the OPCW from political exploitation by US & other Western states. cc @TheIntercept & @democracynow , who have ignored this story. pic.twitter.com/So8ybaZsH0 — Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) October 18, 2020
Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my tip jar on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my sweet merchandise, buying my books Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone and Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-10-19--Verizon Promises to Reach 200M+ Americans with 5G Despite Lawsuits, Warnings, and Opposition

There is research that has already determined 5G is NOT safe .
Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban , delay , halt , and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums on deployment .
In the U.S. lawsuits have been filed against the Federal Communications Commission ( FCC ) for NOT protecting the public from unsafe levels of wireless radiation as well as 5G deployment on land ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ) and in space ( see 1 , 2 ) .
American opposition also includes federal agencies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threaten national security , public safety , and weather forecasting accuracy ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) .
Municipal governments have passed resolutions to ban deployment until studies prove it ’ s safe ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ) and ordinances to limit and/or control installation .
State representatives in Hawaii and Illinois have introduced 5G bills to protect constituents .
Congress members have confronted the FCC with their safety concerns ( see 1 , 2 ) .
Now Verizon is promising 5G @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or not .
Verizon Announces Sub-6,000 MHz Nationwide 5G Network Verizon is promising to reach over 200 million people .
By Chaim Gartenberg @ cgartenberg Oct 13 , 2020 | Original The Verge article here .
Verizon is making a big expansion of its 5G network : the carrier is now rolling out nationwide support for the new networking standard , which will reach more than 200 million people .
Until now , Verizon ’ s 5G has been almost exclusively focused on the mmWave band , which offers the fastest speeds but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact has meant that while AT & T and T-Mobile have been able to boast about broad 5G coverage for the entire country , Verizon has been limited to a few street corners of a small number of cities .
The reliance on mmWave has also meant that Verizon has had to work with device manufacturers to create bespoke mmWave versions of phones specifically for the carrier .
The new DSS 5G network means that Verizon can now support sub-6,000 MHz 5G and offer phones that only support that version of the networking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t just suddenly reverse its 5G strategy overnight or come up with a way to dramatically improve the range of its existing mmWave 5G .
The new nationwide network is actually** just sharing the existing spectrum and networking infrastructure that Verizon already uses for its LTE network** , using new “ dynamic spectrum sharing ” ( DSS ) technology that lets the carrier run LTE and 5G networks side by side .
( AT & T is also using the technology for parts of its 5G rollout . )
The upside of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to quickly expand its low-band 5G offerings .
That gives it the same nationwide 5G footprint as AT & T ’ s and T-Mobile ’ s low-band networks without requiring that Verizon buy the spectrum and build out an entirely new network or cut down on its LTE offerings to allocate that space for 5G .
The new DSS-based Verizon 5G will be held back by the same limitations as its low-band competitors in exchange for that boosted range .
Namely , due to the nature of the spectrum , speeds will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Verizon has been currently offering — although they should still offer an improvement over existing LTE speeds .
Verizon still says that mmWave will be the best experience for 5G and announced that it ’ ll be expanding its coverage for those areas — including in sports stadiums , landmarks , and parks .
The company says it ’ ll be doubling coverage in cities like New York and San Fransisco , along with rolling it out in even more cities .
Activist Post has reported extensively about Sacramento children who became sick @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tower next to their family ’ s home .
Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses after 5G was installed ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) .
Of course , exposure to other sources of Electromagnetic Radiation – including 1G thru 4G – could cause this too .
Nevertheless , the FCC continues to force the deployment of 5G and WiFi throughout the country even though high-speed internet can be provided WITHOUT 5G or WiFi .
The FCC is not a health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ EPA as the regulatory body assigned to protect Americans from the telecom industry .
Unfortunately , they HAVE NOT protected the public for decades and have become more insidious since Trump was elected .
Despite research proving harm , they refuse to update 24-year-old federal RF radiation exposure guidelines .
There are credible doctors and scientists – including the American Academy of Pediatrics – who insist that exposure to all sources of wireless radiation , including 5G , is harmful ( see also 1 , 2 ) .
The FCC still only seems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say .
The majority of scientists worldwide oppose 5G until there are studies proving it isn ’ t unsafe .
Doctors and scientists have asked for moratoriums on Earth and in space ( see 1 , 2 ) .
However , biological risks aren ’ t exclusive to 5G .
Last year the World Health Organization warned that high levels of Electromagnetic Fields ( aka “ Electrosmog ” ) could cause health issues in a significant percentage of the population .
The FCC is part of “ The Swamp ” Trump promised to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and sick from waiting .
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology .
For more information visit our archives and the following websites .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
There is research that has already determined 5G is NOT safe. Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums on deployment. In the U.S. lawsuits have been filed against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for NOT protecting the public from unsafe levels of wireless radiation as well as 5G deployment on land (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) and in space (see 1, 2).
American opposition also includes federal agencies and other experts that warn 5G could threaten national security, public safety, and weather forecasting accuracy (see 1, 2, 3). Municipal governments have passed resolutions to ban deployment until studies prove it’s safe (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) and ordinances to limit and/or control installation.
State representatives in Hawaii and Illinois have introduced 5G bills to protect constituents. Congress members have confronted the FCC with their safety concerns (see 1, 2). Now Verizon is promising 5G for 200+M Americans whether they want it or not.
From Scientists4WiredTech:
Verizon Announces Sub-6,000 MHz Nationwide 5G Network
Verizon is promising to reach over 200 million people.
By Chaim Gartenberg@cgartenberg Oct 13, 2020 | Original The Verge article here.
Verizon is making a big expansion of its 5G network: the carrier is now rolling out nationwide support for the new networking standard, which will reach more than 200 million people.
Until now, Verizon’s 5G has been almost exclusively focused on the mmWave band, which offers the fastest speeds but suffers from extremely poor range. That fact has meant that while AT&T and T-Mobile have been able to boast about broad 5G coverage for the entire country, Verizon has been limited to a few street corners of a small number of cities.
The reliance on mmWave has also meant that Verizon has had to work with device manufacturers to create bespoke mmWave versions of phones specifically for the carrier. The new DSS 5G network means that Verizon can now support sub-6,000 MHz 5G and offer phones that only support that version of the networking standard.
Of course, Verizon didn’t just suddenly reverse its 5G strategy overnight or come up with a way to dramatically improve the range of its existing mmWave 5G. The new nationwide network is actually** just sharing the existing spectrum and networking infrastructure that Verizon already uses for its LTE network**, using new “dynamic spectrum sharing” (DSS) technology that lets the carrier run LTE and 5G networks side by side. (AT&T is also using the technology for parts of its 5G rollout.)
The upside of DSS is that it allows for Verizon to quickly expand its low-band 5G offerings. That gives it the same nationwide 5G footprint as AT&T’s and T-Mobile’s low-band networks without requiring that Verizon buy the spectrum and build out an entirely new network or cut down on its LTE offerings to allocate that space for 5G.
The new DSS-based Verizon 5G will be held back by the same limitations as its low-band competitors in exchange for that boosted range. Namely, due to the nature of the spectrum, speeds will be slower than the ultra-fast mmWave 5G that Verizon has been currently offering — although they should still offer an improvement over existing LTE speeds.
Verizon still says that mmWave will be the best experience for 5G and announced that it’ll be expanding its coverage for those areas — including in sports stadiums, landmarks, and parks. The company says it’ll be doubling coverage in cities like New York and San Fransisco, along with rolling it out in even more cities.


activistpost--2020-10-19--How Do You Police A Free Society?

How Do You Police A Free Society?

Today we delve into the Questions For Corbett archives for an answer to Big-_-Brother , who writes in to ask @ @ @ @ @ society .
How does policing function in a free society , and what would that @ @ @ @ @ for a very timely exploration of this increasingly important question .
Visit James Corbett at @ @ @ @ @ channel on YouTube and Bitchute , and support him on Patreon .
Subscribe to Activist @ @ @ @ @ , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom @ @ @ @ @ SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , @ @ @ @ @ ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By The Corbett Report
Today we delve into the Questions For Corbett archives for an answer to Big-_-Brother, who writes in to ask about policing in a free society. How does policing function in a free society, and what would that look like?
Join James for a very timely exploration of this increasingly important question.
?
Visit James Corbett at CorbettReport.com. Subscribe to his channel on YouTube and Bitchute, and support him on Patreon.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-10-20--Six Ways to Disrupt Agenda 21/2030, The Great Reset, and the Growth of Technocracy

In this video John Bush shares six ways you can disrupt Agenda 21/2030 , The Great Reset , and the Growth of Technocracy .
These are the various vehicles the powers that wish they were are utilizing in order to create a dictatorial technocratic global government in which all humans are tracked and controlled .
Six areas of disruption and opt out… .
• Get out of the city Learn more about Agenda 21/2030 here – https : //www.activistpost .
com/2018/06/forget-agenda-21- uns-2030-agenda-will- transform-the-world.html Learn more about the Great Reset here – https : //www.activistpost .
com/2020/10/your-guide-to-the- great-reset.html Learn more about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ com/tag/technocracy Subscribe to the Live Free Now Show here – http : //livefreenow.show John Bush is a radical activist , entrepreneur , and father of two based in Austin , TX .
He owns and operates Brave Botanicals which offer high quality kratom and CBD .
In 2014 , he founded the Freedom Cell Network which currently has over 5,000 people working together through small groups to secure their sovereignty .
He is the host of the Live Free Now Show .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By John Bush
In this video John Bush shares six ways you can disrupt Agenda 21/2030, The Great Reset, and the Growth of Technocracy.
These are the various vehicles the powers that wish they were are utilizing in order to create a dictatorial technocratic global government in which all humans are tracked and controlled.
Six areas of disruption and opt out….
Stay in good health Raise free and sovereign children Become an entrepreneur / counter-economist Minimize your digital footprint Get out of the city Build community and join the Freedom Cell Network
Learn more about Agenda 21/2030 here – https://www.activistpost. com/2018/06/forget-agenda-21- uns-2030-agenda-will- transform-the-world.html
Learn more about the Great Reset here – https://www.activistpost. com/2020/10/your-guide-to-the- great-reset.html
Learn more about technocracy here – https://www.activistpost. com/tag/technocracy
Subscribe to the Live Free Now Show here – http://livefreenow.show
John Bush is a radical activist, entrepreneur, and father of two based in Austin, TX. He owns and operates Brave Botanicals which offer high quality kratom and CBD. In 2014, he founded the Freedom Cell Network which currently has over 5,000 people working together through small groups to secure their sovereignty. He is the host of the Live Free Now Show.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-10-20--Court Records Show Google Gives Keyword Searches of Innocent People to Cops


activistpost--2020-10-20--NASA Pays Nokia to Put 4G on the Moon.  $370M to 14 Companies for Other Mission Tech — $53.2M to Spa

NASA Pays Nokia to Put 4G on the Moon.  $370M to 14 Companies for Other Mission Tech — $53.2M to SpaceX

All sources of wireless radiation , including 5G , are biologically and environmentally harmful ( see also 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) .
Only time will tell how having 4G and eventually 5G on the moon could affect its environment there as well as its surroundings .
There ’ s little doubt , though , that the astronauts sitting in their tin can far far away will be getting “ Wi-Fried ” .
Nokia and NASA to install 4G on the Moon With competition among Earth ’ s telecoms providers as fierce as ever , equipment maker @ @ @ @ @ @ @ market on Monday , winning a deal to install the first cellular network on the Moon .
The Finnish equipment manufacturer said it was selected by NASA to deploy an “ ultra-compact , low-power , space-hardened ” wireless 4G network on the lunar surface , as part of the US space agency ’ s plan to establish a long-term human presence on the Moon by 2030 .
The $ 14.1 million contract , awarded to Nokia ’ s US subsidiary , is part of NASA ’ s Artemis programme which aims to send @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to the moon by 2024 .
The astronauts will begin carrying out detailed experiments and explorations which the agency hopes will help it develop its first human mission to Mars .
Nokia ’ s network equipment will be installed remotely on the Moon ’ s surface using a lunar hopper built by Intuitive Machines in late 2022 , Nokia said .
“ The network will self-configure upon deployment , ” the firm said in a statement , adding that the wireless technology will allow for “ vital command and control functions , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ navigation and streaming of high definition video.
” The 4G equipment can be updated to a super-fast 5G network in the future , Nokia said .
In all , NASA announced last week it would distribute $ 370 million to 14 companies to supply “ Tipping Point ” technologies for its mission , which include robotics and new methods of harvesting the resources required for living on the moon , such as oxygen and energy sources .
The bulk of the funding went to companies researching cryogenic propellants , freezing liquids used to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Musk ’ s SpaceX received $ 53.2 million for a demonstration of the transferring of ten metric tons of liquid oxygen between tanks on a starship vehicle , NASA said .

By B.N. Frank
All sources of wireless radiation, including 5G, are biologically and environmentally harmful (see also 1, 2, 3, 4). Only time will tell how having 4G and eventually 5G on the moon could affect its environment there as well as its surroundings. There’s little doubt, though, that the astronauts sitting in their tin can far far away will be getting “Wi-Fried”.
From Yahoo:
Nokia and NASA to install 4G on the Moon
With competition among Earth’s telecoms providers as fierce as ever, equipment maker Nokia announced its expansion into a new market on Monday, winning a deal to install the first cellular network on the Moon.
The Finnish equipment manufacturer said it was selected by NASA to deploy an “ultra-compact, low-power, space-hardened” wireless 4G network on the lunar surface, as part of the US space agency’s plan to establish a long-term human presence on the Moon by 2030.
The $14.1 million contract, awarded to Nokia’s US subsidiary, is part of NASA’s Artemis programme which aims to send the first woman, and next man, to the moon by 2024.
The astronauts will begin carrying out detailed experiments and explorations which the agency hopes will help it develop its first human mission to Mars.
Nokia’s network equipment will be installed remotely on the Moon’s surface using a lunar hopper built by Intuitive Machines in late 2022, Nokia said.
“The network will self-configure upon deployment,” the firm said in a statement, adding that the wireless technology will allow for “vital command and control functions, remote control of lunar rovers, real-time navigation and streaming of high definition video.”
The 4G equipment can be updated to a super-fast 5G network in the future, Nokia said.
In all, NASA announced last week it would distribute $370 million to 14 companies to supply “Tipping Point” technologies for its mission, which include robotics and new methods of harvesting the resources required for living on the moon, such as oxygen and energy sources.
The bulk of the funding went to companies researching cryogenic propellants, freezing liquids used to fuel spacecraft.
Among them, Elon Musk’s SpaceX received $53.2 million for a demonstration of the transferring of ten metric tons of liquid oxygen between tanks on a starship vehicle, NASA said.


activistpost--2020-10-20--Natural Resources Defense Council: The FCC “Has Failed to Protect the Public from Radiofrequency Emi