activistpost--2020-07-19--1,000 Phrases That Incorrectly Trigger Alexa, Siri, and Google Assistant to Start Listening and Reco

1,000 Phrases That Incorrectly Trigger Alexa, Siri, and Google Assistant to Start Listening and Recording

Not only do home assistants emit harmful electromagnetic radiation which can make people and animals sick ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ) AND increase their cancer risk ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) – they have been known to collect data on users without their knowledge or their permission .
For those who want to use them anyway – Ars Technica provides details on what words may trigger unwanted surveillance .
As Alexa , Google Home , Siri , and other voice assistants have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ privacy advocates have grown concerned that their near-constant listening to nearby conversations could pose more risk than benefit to users .
New research suggests the privacy threat may be greater than previously thought .
The findings demonstrate how common it is for dialog in TV shows and other sources to produce false triggers that cause the devices to turn on , sometimes sending nearby sounds to Amazon , Apple , Google , or other manufacturers .
In all , researchers uncovered more than 1,000 word sequences—including those from Game of Thrones , Modern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ news broadcasts—that incorrectly trigger the devices .
“ The devices are intentionally programmed in a somewhat forgiving manner , because they are supposed to be able to understand their humans , ” one of the researchers , Dorothea Kolossa , said .
“ Therefore , they are more likely to start up once too often rather than not at all.
” That which must not be said Examples of words or word sequences that provide false triggers include Google Home : “ OK , cool , ” and “ Okay , who is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a GoT character saying “ a letter ” and Modern Family character uttering “ hey Jerry ” and activating Alexa and Siri , respectively .
Update , 7/2020 , 9:06 AM California time : More than 36 hours after Ars asked for comment , Amazon provided the following statement : Unfortunately , we have not been given the opportunity to review the methodology behind this study to validate the accuracy of these claims .
However , we can assure you that we have built privacy deeply into the Alexa service , and our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after detecting the wake word .
Customers talk to Alexa billions of times a month and in rare cases devices may wake up after hearing a word that sounds like “ Alexa ” or one of the other available wake words .
By design , our wake word detection and speech recognition get better every day – as customers use their devices , we optimize performance .
We continue to invest in improving our wake word detection technology and encourage the researchers to share their methodology with us so we can respond in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about unsafe technology .
For more information , visit our archives .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
Not only do home assistants emit harmful electromagnetic radiation which can make people and animals sick (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) AND increase their cancer risk (see 1, 2, 3, 4) – they have been known to collect data on users without their knowledge or their permission.
For those who want to use them anyway – Ars Technica provides details on what words may trigger unwanted surveillance.
As Alexa, Google Home, Siri, and other voice assistants have become fixtures in millions of homes, privacy advocates have grown concerned that their near-constant listening to nearby conversations could pose more risk than benefit to users. New research suggests the privacy threat may be greater than previously thought.
The findings demonstrate how common it is for dialog in TV shows and other sources to produce false triggers that cause the devices to turn on, sometimes sending nearby sounds to Amazon, Apple, Google, or other manufacturers. In all, researchers uncovered more than 1,000 word sequences—including those from Game of Thrones, Modern Family, House of Cards, and news broadcasts—that incorrectly trigger the devices.
“The devices are intentionally programmed in a somewhat forgiving manner, because they are supposed to be able to understand their humans,” one of the researchers, Dorothea Kolossa, said. “Therefore, they are more likely to start up once too often rather than not at all.”
That which must not be said
Examples of words or word sequences that provide false triggers include
Alexa: “unacceptable,” “election,” and “a letter”
Google Home: “OK, cool,” and “Okay, who is reading”
Siri: “a city” and “hey jerry”
Microsoft Cortana: “Montana”
The two videos below show a GoT character saying “a letter” and Modern Family character uttering “hey Jerry” and activating Alexa and Siri, respectively.
[…]
Update, 7/2020, 9:06 AM California time: More than 36 hours after Ars asked for comment, Amazon provided the following statement:
Unfortunately, we have not been given the opportunity to review the methodology behind this study to validate the accuracy of these claims. However, we can assure you that we have built privacy deeply into the Alexa service, and our devices are designed to wake up only after detecting the wake word. Customers talk to Alexa billions of times a month and in rare cases devices may wake up after hearing a word that sounds like “Alexa” or one of the other available wake words. By design, our wake word detection and speech recognition get better every day – as customers use their devices, we optimize performance. We continue to invest in improving our wake word detection technology and encourage the researchers to share their methodology with us so we can respond in further detail.
Read full article
Activist Post Recommended Book: The Age of Surveillance Capitalism
Activist Post reports regularly about unsafe technology. For more information, visit our archives.
Image: Truth Theory
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-07-18--Judge Says Facebook’s $550M Settlement for Facial Recognition Case Is Not Nearly Enough

There ’ s a saying – “ I don ’ t ask for permission , I ask for forgiveness.
” Facebook likes collecting user data even when users aren ’ t aware of it or agree to it .
Company spokespeople apologize when the company is caught and eventually penalized .
But this hasn ’ t stopped them from violating privacy and profiting from it .
In fact , the company recently filed a patent for a system that hides audio clips in TV ads in order to trigger phones to start recording background noise .
Sometimes the only thing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their actions cost them a whole lot of money .
Maybe that ’ s why this judge is taking such a hard stance against Facebook .
Next week , lawyers for Facebook will be back in court , trying to convince a judge they should be allowed to settle a class action lawsuit that accuses the company of violating users ’ privacy .
Facebook agreed earlier this year to pay $ 550 million to settle the case , which claims that the tech giant illegally used facial-recognition technology in its “ tag suggestions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ largest-ever payout as the result of a class-action lawsuit alleging online privacy violations .
It was brought under an Illinois biometric privacy law that allows people who have had their faces scanned for data without written consent to sue for damages of at least $ 1,000 per violation .
But under the settlement , people who have had their face data harvested in Illinois are expected to receive checks of just $ 150 .
U.S. District Judge James Donato of California , who is overseeing the case , says that payout is woefully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 550 million .
That ’ s a lot .
But the question is , is it really a lot ?
” Donato asked lawyers for the plaintiffs and Facebook on June 4 , according to a transcript of the hearing reviewed by NPR .
“ They are taking what is effectively a 98.75 percent discount , ” he said , “ off of the amount that the Illinois legislature said might be due in this case if you proved up your case.
” Attorneys for both Facebook and the plaintiffs were taken aback @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether the settlement amount is adequately compensating those who say Facebook invaded their privacy comes after the lawsuit dragged on for five years .
There were multiple appeals and unsuccessful mediation attempts .
“ We had two failed mediation attempts .
And we were truly , from the plaintiff ’ s perspective , on the brink of trial , ” privacy lawyer Rafey Balabanian told the judge .
“ I can ’ t tell you how many times the parties dug in and claimed that they wouldn ’ t move.
” A lawyer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back on the judge ’ s assessment that the settlement is too paltry a sum , saying he believes users may receive more than the estimated $ 150 apiece .
“ This is an extraordinary amount of recovery , and I think that we ’ re being too conservative on what we think the per claim eligible form will end up producing , ” Rhodes told the judge .
But the judge insisted that members of the class-action deserve a bigger payout , saying in effect : come up with a larger number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Judge not willing to let Facebook ‘ off the hook ’ Facebook ’ s legal team and the privacy rights lawyers are slated to return to court next week for a hearing to attempt to sort through the stalemate .
Lawyers on both sides declined to comment on what to expect .
But Facebook spokeswoman Dina El-Kassaby said in a statement that the company supports resolving the litigation by settling .
“ As we explained in January , we decided to pursue a settlement as it was in the best interest of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ past this matter , ” she said .
The payouts go only to residents of Illinois , since the lawsuit was brought under the state biometric privacy law , viewed as one of the strongest and most comprehensive data privacy laws in the country .
This case applies the law to Facebook ’ s “ tag suggestions ” service , a feature that attempts to recognize friends in photos in order to link the photographs to their accounts .
The federal judge said at the June hearing that the law should be fully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ The Illinois legislature set this privacy expectation and privacy right as a serious one , and they put a high price tag on it for that reason , ” Donato said .
The judge also raised the question of whether Facebook breached a 2012 agreement over user privacy that the tech giant struck with the Federal Trade Commission .
Last year , the FTC fined Facebook $ 5 billion for privacy violations and mishandling user data .
As part of the accord , Facebook agreed to give users better notice about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ lawyers “ have a pretty good argument ” that Facebook ’ s actions with facial recognition technology violated the 2012 agreement with regulators .
If so , he said it could be an example of “ an intentional or reckless violation ” of the state law , which could warrant even higher penalties of $ 5,000 per person .
Other Facebook-owned companies , like WhatsApp and Instagram , are not named as defendants in the class-action .
But Judge Donato said “ I could see the possibility ” that those Facebook subsidiaries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ I am not willing to let those companies off the hook in this case , ” he said .
“ The amount that the aggrieved people are going to get is $ 150 .
That just doesn ’ t seem right to me.
” Facebook , valued at more than $ 680 billion , had indicated that the long-running litigation had become a major expense from the company .
While the $ 550 million settlement is historic , lawyers have said in filings that under the maximum possible penalty , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But Balabanian , an attorney representing those who sued Facebook , told the judge that he did not believe such an eye-popping amount would survive on appeal .
“ It is almost a certainty that the court would cut that damage award down , ” he said .
We can all hope that Facebook will finally change its dastardly ways .
Along with some other high profile companies it ’ s named in a lawsuit for “ Endangering Humanity with the misuse of Artificial Intelligence , Complicity and Aiding in Physical Genocide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Engaging in Cultural Genocide of Humanity , & Controlling and programming the Human Race by Social Engineering via AI coding and AI algorithmic biometric manipulation ” .
So there ’ s that too .
Meanwhile , there are many attractive options to Facebook that you can find in the links at the end of this article .
Activist Post reports regularly about tech and telecom industry shenanigans and unsafe technology .
For more information , visit our archives .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
There’s a saying – “I don’t ask for permission, I ask for forgiveness.” Facebook likes collecting user data even when users aren’t aware of it or agree to it. Company spokespeople apologize when the company is caught and eventually penalized. But this hasn’t stopped them from violating privacy and profiting from it. In fact, the company recently filed a patent for a system that hides audio clips in TV ads in order to trigger phones to start recording background noise.
Sometimes the only thing that causes people to change is when their actions cost them a whole lot of money. Maybe that’s why this judge is taking such a hard stance against Facebook.
From NPR:
Next week, lawyers for Facebook will be back in court, trying to convince a judge they should be allowed to settle a class action lawsuit that accuses the company of violating users’ privacy.
Facebook agreed earlier this year to pay $550 million to settle the case, which claims that the tech giant illegally used facial-recognition technology in its “tag suggestions” service.
The deal was the largest-ever payout as the result of a class-action lawsuit alleging online privacy violations.
It was brought under an Illinois biometric privacy law that allows people who have had their faces scanned for data without written consent to sue for damages of at least $1,000 per violation.
But under the settlement, people who have had their face data harvested in Illinois are expected to receive checks of just $150.
U.S. District Judge James Donato of California, who is overseeing the case, says that payout is woefully inadequate.
“It’s $550 million. That’s a lot. But the question is, is it really a lot?” Donato asked lawyers for the plaintiffs and Facebook on June 4, according to a transcript of the hearing reviewed by NPR.
“They are taking what is effectively a 98.75 percent discount,” he said, “off of the amount that the Illinois legislature said might be due in this case if you proved up your case.”
Attorneys for both Facebook and the plaintiffs were taken aback.
The judge’s skepticism about whether the settlement amount is adequately compensating those who say Facebook invaded their privacy comes after the lawsuit dragged on for five years. There were multiple appeals and unsuccessful mediation attempts.
“We had two failed mediation attempts. And we were truly, from the plaintiff’s perspective, on the brink of trial,” privacy lawyer Rafey Balabanian told the judge. “I can’t tell you how many times the parties dug in and claimed that they wouldn’t move.”
A lawyer for Facebook, Michael Rhodes, pushed back on the judge’s assessment that the settlement is too paltry a sum, saying he believes users may receive more than the estimated $150 apiece.
“This is an extraordinary amount of recovery, and I think that we’re being too conservative on what we think the per claim eligible form will end up producing,” Rhodes told the judge.
But the judge insisted that members of the class-action deserve a bigger payout, saying in effect: come up with a larger number, or prepare to go to trial.
Judge not willing to let Facebook ‘off the hook’
Facebook’s legal team and the privacy rights lawyers are slated to return to court next week for a hearing to attempt to sort through the stalemate. Lawyers on both sides declined to comment on what to expect.
But Facebook spokeswoman Dina El-Kassaby said in a statement that the company supports resolving the litigation by settling.
“As we explained in January, we decided to pursue a settlement as it was in the best interest of our community and our shareholders to move past this matter,” she said.
The payouts go only to residents of Illinois, since the lawsuit was brought under the state biometric privacy law, viewed as one of the strongest and most comprehensive data privacy laws in the country.
This case applies the law to Facebook’s “tag suggestions” service, a feature that attempts to recognize friends in photos in order to link the photographs to their accounts.
The federal judge said at the June hearing that the law should be fully applied to Facebook’s alleged violations.
“The Illinois legislature set this privacy expectation and privacy right as a serious one, and they put a high price tag on it for that reason,” Donato said.
The judge also raised the question of whether Facebook breached a 2012 agreement over user privacy that the tech giant struck with the Federal Trade Commission. Last year, the FTC fined Facebook $5 billion for privacy violations and mishandling user data. As part of the accord, Facebook agreed to give users better notice about its face-scanning software.
Donato said plaintiffs’ lawyers “have a pretty good argument” that Facebook’s actions with facial recognition technology violated the 2012 agreement with regulators. If so, he said it could be an example of “an intentional or reckless violation” of the state law, which could warrant even higher penalties of $5,000 per person.
Other Facebook-owned companies, like WhatsApp and Instagram, are not named as defendants in the class-action. But Judge Donato said “I could see the possibility” that those Facebook subsidiaries also violated the Illinois data privacy law.
“I am not willing to let those companies off the hook in this case,” he said. “The amount that the aggrieved people are going to get is $150. That just doesn’t seem right to me.”
Facebook, valued at more than $680 billion, had indicated that the long-running litigation had become a major expense from the company.
While the $550 million settlement is historic, lawyers have said in filings that under the maximum possible penalty, the payout could have reached $47 billion.
But Balabanian, an attorney representing those who sued Facebook, told the judge that he did not believe such an eye-popping amount would survive on appeal.
“It is almost a certainty that the court would cut that damage award down,” he said.
We can all hope that Facebook will finally change its dastardly ways. Along with some other high profile companies it’s named in a lawsuit for “Endangering Humanity with the misuse of Artificial Intelligence, Complicity and Aiding in Physical Genocide inside of China by transferring AI Technology, Engaging in Cultural Genocide of Humanity, & Controlling and programming the Human Race by Social Engineering via AI coding and AI algorithmic biometric manipulation”.
So there’s that too.
Meanwhile, there are many attractive options to Facebook that you can find in the links at the end of this article.
Activist Post reports regularly about tech and telecom industry shenanigans and unsafe technology. For more information, visit our archives.
Image: Pixabay
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-07-18--Bermuda Petition to Block 5G Has 3200 Signatures

Cities AS WELL AS entire countries have taken action to ban , delay , halt , and limit 5G installation as well as issue moratoriums ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 .
13 , 14 ) .
In fact , the majority of scientists worldwide are opposed to 5G until studies show that it ’ s safe .
Opposition is now gaining strength in Bermuda as well .
A petition set up to block the introduction of 5G mobile phone technology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Camilla MacPherson , of Bermuda Advocates for Safe Technology , said that there were sound scientific reasons to be wary of the dangers of wireless radiation .
Ms MacPherson added : “ People who want to discuss the health implications of electromagnetic frequencies are often branded as people with tin foil hats .
“ But we have had overwhelming support from the community.
” The petition has been signed by 3,200 people , alongside 32 letters of objection to 5G technology , on the Regulatory Authority of Bermuda ’ s website .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to educate and inform our community and policymakers about the dangers of exposure to unsafe levels of wireless radiation .
“ We call on our government and regulatory agencies to make a firm commitment to our health and our children ’ s health and deny small cell and 5G applications and to create a more protective policy for wireless radiation in our community.
” The campaign group said it was worried by some scientific studies that suggested electromagnetic radiation could make chronic illnesses worse and cause some cancers , such as glioblastomas of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ A lot of people have contacted us to express their concern about the issues or feel that towers in their neighbourhoods contributed to their cancer.
” The 5G technology — dubbed the network of the “ near future ” by supporters — is said to provide quicker downloads and better network reliability .
But the 5G infrastructure has a more limited range than the earlier 4G network and needs more cell towers .
Opponents argued that more cell towers would expose the public to more electromagnetic radiation .
The RA is still @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public-consultation process for integrated communications operating licences .
The Bermuda petition organisers appealed to people with comments or responses to the preliminary report and order to submit them to the RA before the July 20 deadline .
They questioned why Horizon Communications was verified as a qualified applicant for an ICOL in May , when its business proposal was centred around 5G technology .
Ms MacPherson said : “ I think it is putting the cart before the horse.
” She questioned if it represented a change in the RA ’ s decision @ @ @ @ @ @ @ earlier this year .
But Charmaine Burgess , the director of communications and stakeholder engagement at the authority , said there was no alteration in its stance , which it confirmed in April .
She added : “ Our process is to first carry out a detailed radio frequency study , which will be conducted in the coming months.
” Ms Burgess highlighted the public ’ s opportunity to review and comment on the potential grant of multiple licences .
She said : “ Therefore , I can confirm that Horizon Communications has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gilbert “ Artie ” Darrell , the founder of Horizon Communications , said : “ Unfortunately , with the pending review of 5G in Bermuda by the RA , it would be premature for me to comment.
” The introduction of 5G has sparked worldwide health and safety fears .
Ayesha Peets Talbot , a doctor and director of Ocean Rock Wellness in Paget , said she had seen at least one patient who believed she had suffered harm from electromagnetic radiation .
The patient lived next to a wireless communications company , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bedroom window .
Dr Peets Talbot said : “ She stayed there for years .
A few years ago she started to develop multiple cancers .
She is in her forties .
“ Her cancers were coming on so rapidly she was confusing a lot of the doctors.
” She said the patient ’ s history suggested it was hard to ignore the radiation exposure she had been subjected to .
Dr Peets Talbot added that Bermuda had to do more to ensure people were protected before it introduced 5G technology .
She @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children .
I really do think about their EMF exposure .
I make sure I turn off the wi-fi at night .
“ I make sure they have EMF protection when they are using their tablets and mobile devices .
I make sure they sit far away from a flatscreen.
” She also questioned the potential impact on Bermuda ’ s sensitive ecosystem .
Dr Peets Talbot said : “ We are not against technological advancement , but feel safe technology is smart technology .
Ootherwise , it ’ s not really advancing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are either all for it or against it , which is not at all the case .
We do not wish to turn back the digital clock.
” Switzerland , one of the world ’ s leaders in the introduction of 5G , in February imposed an open-ended ban on the use of its new network .
An independent panel advised the World Health Organisation ’ s International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2010 that mobile phone and other wireless radio frequency radiation should be classified as a “ possible human carcinogen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carried out up to that date .
• For more information about the RA preliminary report visit www.ra.bm/documents/2020-04-03-invitation-to-comment-on-proposed-change-of-control-2/ ?
wpdmdl=14681 & ind=1586353520977 .
The public can submit comments and responses , electronically at www.ra.bm/submit-a-response-form/ .
Its petition is at www.change.org/p/bermuda-government-we-are-concerned-about-the-growing-body-of-scientific-research-showing-adverse-health Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology .
For more information visit our archives and the following websites .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
Cities AS WELL AS entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit 5G installation as well as issue moratoriums (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. 13, 14).
In fact, the majority of scientists worldwide are opposed to 5G until studies show that it’s safe.
Opposition is now gaining strength in Bermuda as well.
From the Royal Gazette:
A petition set up to block the introduction of 5G mobile phone technology has attracted more than 3,000 signatures.
Camilla MacPherson, of Bermuda Advocates for Safe Technology, said that there were sound scientific reasons to be wary of the dangers of wireless radiation.
Ms MacPherson added: “People who want to discuss the health implications of electromagnetic frequencies are often branded as people with tin foil hats.
“But we have had overwhelming support from the community.”
The petition has been signed by 3,200 people, alongside 32 letters of objection to 5G technology, on the Regulatory Authority of Bermuda’s website.
The petition said: “Our mission is to educate and inform our community and policymakers about the dangers of exposure to unsafe levels of wireless radiation.
“We call on our government and regulatory agencies to make a firm commitment to our health and our children’s health and deny small cell and 5G applications and to create a more protective policy for wireless radiation in our community.”
The campaign group said it was worried by some scientific studies that suggested electromagnetic radiation could make chronic illnesses worse and cause some cancers, such as glioblastomas of the brain.
Ms MacPherson said: “A lot of people have contacted us to express their concern about the issues or feel that towers in their neighbourhoods contributed to their cancer.”
The 5G technology — dubbed the network of the “near future” by supporters — is said to provide quicker downloads and better network reliability.
But the 5G infrastructure has a more limited range than the earlier 4G network and needs more cell towers.
Opponents argued that more cell towers would expose the public to more electromagnetic radiation.
The RA is still in the preliminary report phase of the public-consultation process for integrated communications operating licences.
The Bermuda petition organisers appealed to people with comments or responses to the preliminary report and order to submit them to the RA before the July 20 deadline.
They questioned why Horizon Communications was verified as a qualified applicant for an ICOL in May, when its business proposal was centred around 5G technology.
Ms MacPherson said: “I think it is putting the cart before the horse.”
She questioned if it represented a change in the RA’s decision to hold off on 5G, announced earlier this year.
But Charmaine Burgess, the director of communications and stakeholder engagement at the authority, said there was no alteration in its stance, which it confirmed in April.
She added: “Our process is to first carry out a detailed radio frequency study, which will be conducted in the coming months.”
Ms Burgess highlighted the public’s opportunity to review and comment on the potential grant of multiple licences.
She said: “Therefore, I can confirm that Horizon Communications has not been granted an ICOL licence.”
Gilbert “Artie” Darrell, the founder of Horizon Communications, said: “Unfortunately, with the pending review of 5G in Bermuda by the RA, it would be premature for me to comment.”
The introduction of 5G has sparked worldwide health and safety fears.
Ayesha Peets Talbot, a doctor and director of Ocean Rock Wellness in Paget, said she had seen at least one patient who believed she had suffered harm from electromagnetic radiation.
The patient lived next to a wireless communications company, with equipment 20 to 30ft from her bedroom window.
Dr Peets Talbot said: “She stayed there for years. A few years ago she started to develop multiple cancers. She is in her forties.
“Her cancers were coming on so rapidly she was confusing a lot of the doctors.”
She said the patient’s history suggested it was hard to ignore the radiation exposure she had been subjected to.
Dr Peets Talbot added that Bermuda had to do more to ensure people were protected before it introduced 5G technology.
She said: “I have three young children. I really do think about their EMF exposure. I make sure I turn off the wi-fi at night.
“I make sure they have EMF protection when they are using their tablets and mobile devices. I make sure they sit far away from a flatscreen.”
She also questioned the potential impact on Bermuda’s sensitive ecosystem.
Dr Peets Talbot said: “We are not against technological advancement, but feel safe technology is smart technology. Ootherwise, it’s not really advancing us.
“Some people think you are either all for it or against it, which is not at all the case. We do not wish to turn back the digital clock.”
Switzerland, one of the world’s leaders in the introduction of 5G, in February imposed an open-ended ban on the use of its new network.
An independent panel advised the World Health Organisation’s International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2010 that mobile phone and other wireless radio frequency radiation should be classified as a “possible human carcinogen”, based on evidence from studies carried out up to that date.
• For more information about the RA preliminary report visit www.ra.bm/documents/2020-04-03-invitation-to-comment-on-proposed-change-of-control-2/?wpdmdl=14681&ind=1586353520977. The public can submit comments and responses, electronically at www.ra.bm/submit-a-response-form/. Its petition is at www.change.org/p/bermuda-government-we-are-concerned-about-the-growing-body-of-scientific-research-showing-adverse-health
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-07-18--Your Body, Their Choice

Your Body, Their Choice

Stripped of its contextual baggage , the phrase “ My Body , My Choice ” makes a compelling rallying cry @ @ @ @ @ truth that we all innately understand : I have the claim to my own body @ @ @ @ @ it .
So why , then , are we being asked to believe that when @ @ @ @ @ a declared pandemic it is “ Your Body , Their Choice ” ?
Visit James @ @ @ @ @ to his channel on YouTube and Bitchute , and support him on Patreon .
Subscribe @ @ @ @ @ , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace @ @ @ @ @ us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
@ @ @ @ @ from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By James Corbett
Stripped of its contextual baggage, the phrase “My Body, My Choice” makes a compelling rallying cry because it conveys a fundamental truth that we all innately understand: I have the claim to my own body and what is done to it. So why, then, are we being asked to believe that when it comes to vaccinations during a declared pandemic it is “Your Body, Their Choice”?
Visit James Corbett at CorbettReport.com. Subscribe to his channel on YouTube and Bitchute, and support him on Patreon.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-07-18--US Customs Plans To Tap Into Nationwide License Plate Reading Network For Border Security

US Customs and Border Protection ( CBP ) published a new assessment titled “ Privacy Impact Assessment for the CBP License Plate Reader Technology , ” outlining the agency ’ s plan to combine its database on license plate images with ones from local and state governments , law enforcement agencies , parking garages , toll booth cameras , and financial institutions .
The US has a massive network of automatic license plate readers ( ALPR ) , typically found on police cars and toll booths used to collect license plates of vehicles passing by .
We noted one database @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Public Safety Network ( RPSN ) , gives law enforcement real-time access to license plates , captures approximately 150 million plate reads per month .
To better protect the nation , the CBP ’ s new assessment indicates it now wants direct access to these databases .
“ To meet its vast mission requirements , CBP relies on a variety of law enforcement tools and techniques for law enforcement and border security , ” the assessment said .
“ One such tool is license plate reader ( LPR ) technology , which consists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on vehicles or in fixed locations that automatically and without direct human control locate , focus on , and photograph license plates and vehicles that come into range of the device.
” CBP said most Americans “ might not be aware ” that ALPRs are deployed at border crossings to collect license plate information .
The agency said people should avoid areas where ALPRs are deployed if they don ’ t want to be surveilled .
The system will allow CBP agents to quickly enter a license plate number of a vehicle in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ responsive records ” ( or hits ) on any license plate readers that detected the vehicle within the last 30 days .
The assessment said the overall goal of the new database , by aggregating third-party data with its own , will allow agents to “ identify individuals , or vehicles , involved in criminal activity which may need additional scrutiny when attempting to cross the border or to identify and locate suspects involved in terrorist activities.
” The federal government ’ s obsession with monitoring everyone and everything is becoming the norm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Tyler Durden
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published a new assessment titled “Privacy Impact Assessment for the CBP License Plate Reader Technology,” outlining the agency’s plan to combine its database on license plate images with ones from local and state governments, law enforcement agencies, parking garages, toll booth cameras, and financial institutions.
The US has a massive network of automatic license plate readers (ALPR), typically found on police cars and toll booths used to collect license plates of vehicles passing by. We noted one database, in particular, called the Rekor Public Safety Network (RPSN), gives law enforcement real-time access to license plates, captures approximately 150 million plate reads per month. To better protect the nation, the CBP’s new assessment indicates it now wants direct access to these databases.
“To meet its vast mission requirements, CBP relies on a variety of law enforcement tools and techniques for law enforcement and border security,” the assessment said. “One such tool is license plate reader (LPR) technology, which consists of high-speed cameras and related equipment mounted on vehicles or in fixed locations that automatically and without direct human control locate, focus on, and photograph license plates and vehicles that come into range of the device.”
CBP said most Americans “might not be aware” that ALPRs are deployed at border crossings to collect license plate information. The agency said people should avoid areas where ALPRs are deployed if they don’t want to be surveilled.
The system will allow CBP agents to quickly enter a license plate number of a vehicle in the database and search for “any responsive records” (or hits) on any license plate readers that detected the vehicle within the last 30 days.
The assessment said the overall goal of the new database, by aggregating third-party data with its own, will allow agents to “identify individuals, or vehicles, involved in criminal activity which may need additional scrutiny when attempting to cross the border or to identify and locate suspects involved in terrorist activities.”
The federal government’s obsession with monitoring everyone and everything is becoming the norm in a post-corona world.
Source: Zerohedge
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-07-18--Apple Whines That Jury Trial for Class Action Lawsuit on Illegal Cell Phone Radiation Levels Undermi

Apple Whines That Jury Trial for Class Action Lawsuit on Illegal Cell Phone Radiation Levels Undermines FCC

Activist Post reported about this situation in February : Judge Blasts FCC Testing and May Let Jury Decide If Apple Committed Fraud by Marketing iPhones as Safety It appears that Apple is still trying to drag this out at the expense of public health .
Saying a jury trial would undermine the Federal Communications Commission ’ s authority is bombastically desperate considering that the proudly “ NOT heavy handed ” regulatory agency seems to be on everybody ’ s s**t list except for the telecom industry ’ s ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 10 .
11 , 12 , 13 .
14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ) .
Lawsuits have already been filed against the FCC for NOT protecting Americans from unsafe levels of radiation ( see 1 , 2 ) as well as unwanted 5G deployment ( see 1 , 2 ) .
Doesn ’ t it seem like more Americans than not think that the agency ’ s authority should be undermined ?
Even one of their own commissioners recently cried foul on their authority .
SAN FRANCISCO ( CN ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claiming Apple failed to warn consumers about dangerous radiation from iPhones , an Apple attorney told a federal judge Thursday that bringing the case to a jury will undermine the Federal Communications Commission ’ s authority .
“ Plaintiffs are asking for a jury to second guess the FCC , ” Apple lawyer Christina Sarchio , of Dechert LLP , argued during a summary judgment hearing via telephone Thursday .
Lead plaintiff Andrew Cohen sued cellphone makers Apple and Samsung in August 2019 after the Chicago Tribune revealed an FCC-certified lab ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Galaxy smartphones surpassed federal safety limits .
Samsung was voluntarily dismissed as a defendant in the case in January .
The plaintiffs commissioned their own independent tests in 2019 and cited tests conducted by the Canadian Broadcasting Company in 2017 and French National Frequencies Agency in 2018 , all of which found radiofrequency radiation exposure from iPhones exceeded federal safety limits .
In February , U.S. District Judge William Alsup denied Apple ’ s motion to dismiss the case , finding more evidence was needed to determine why two FCC-certified labs reached @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to test identical iPhones .
The plaintiffs say Apple has defied Alsup ’ s directive by refusing to hand over a single non-public document it gave the FCC before the agency concluded that iPhones do not pose radiation-exposure risks .
On Thursday , Alsup questioned why the world ’ s third largest supplier of smartphones is refusing to turn over those documents .
Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Activist Post reports regularly about the FCC and unsafe technology .
For more information , visit our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
Activist Post reported about this situation in February:
Judge Blasts FCC Testing and May Let Jury Decide If Apple Committed Fraud by Marketing iPhones as Safety
It appears that Apple is still trying to drag this out at the expense of public health. Saying a jury trial would undermine the Federal Communications Commission’s authority is bombastically desperate considering that the proudly “NOT heavy handed” regulatory agency seems to be on everybody’s s**t list except for the telecom industry’s (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. 11, 12, 13. 14, 15, 16, 17).
Lawsuits have already been filed against the FCC for NOT protecting Americans from unsafe levels of radiation (see 1, 2) as well as unwanted 5G deployment (see 1, 2). Doesn’t it seem like more Americans than not think that the agency’s authority should be undermined? Even one of their own commissioners recently cried foul on their authority.
From Courthouse News:
SAN FRANCISCO (CN) — Pushing to defeat a class action claiming Apple failed to warn consumers about dangerous radiation from iPhones, an Apple attorney told a federal judge Thursday that bringing the case to a jury will undermine the Federal Communications Commission’s authority. “Plaintiffs are asking for a jury to second guess the FCC,” Apple lawyer Christina Sarchio, of Dechert LLP, argued during a summary judgment hearing via telephone Thursday. Lead plaintiff Andrew Cohen sued cellphone makers Apple and Samsung in August 2019 after the Chicago Tribune revealed an FCC-certified lab’s findings that radiofrequency radiation exposure from iPhone and Galaxy smartphones surpassed federal safety limits. Samsung was voluntarily dismissed as a defendant in the case in January. The plaintiffs commissioned their own independent tests in 2019 and cited tests conducted by the Canadian Broadcasting Company in 2017 and French National Frequencies Agency in 2018, all of which found radiofrequency radiation exposure from iPhones exceeded federal safety limits. In February, U.S. District Judge William Alsup denied Apple’s motion to dismiss the case, finding more evidence was needed to determine why two FCC-certified labs reached opposite conclusions when using the same guidelines to test identical iPhones. The plaintiffs say Apple has defied Alsup’s directive by refusing to hand over a single non-public document it gave the FCC before the agency concluded that iPhones do not pose radiation-exposure risks. On Thursday, Alsup questioned why the world’s third largest supplier of smartphones is refusing to turn over those documents. Read full article
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
Activist Post reports regularly about the FCC and unsafe technology. For more information, visit our archives.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-07-18--Zen & Willem Rafting Through the River of Insanity

Zen Gardner & Willem Felderhof in conversation about their personal experiences and evolving perspectives , our shared surreal reality and @ @ @ @ @ at Truth Comes to Light Lbry channel .
Willem Felderhof is a former commercial airline @ @ @ @ @ the presence of toxic elements in aviation generally known as “ the Aerotoxic syndrome ” @ @ @ @ @ HERE .
Willem is also the organizer of the Open Mind Conferences in the Netherlands @ @ @ @ @ BitChute and Twitter .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom @ @ @ @ @ the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE @ @ @ @ @ Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming @ @ @ @ @ of Counter Markets today .

by Willem Felderhof with Zen Gardner
Zen Gardner & Willem Felderhof in conversation about their personal experiences and evolving perspectives, our shared surreal reality and unfolding events.

Also available at Truth Comes to Light Lbry channel.
Willem Felderhof is a former commercial airline pilot, and whistleblower on the presence of toxic elements in aviation generally known as “the Aerotoxic syndrome”. For more info click HERE.
Willem is also the organizer of the Open Mind Conferences in the Netherlands.
Connect with Willem on BitChute and Twitter.
Source: Truth Comes to Light
Image
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-07-19--Your Body, Their Choice

Your Body, Their Choice


activistpost--2020-07-19--US Customs Plans To Tap Into Nationwide License Plate Reading Network For Border Security


activistpost--2020-07-19--Woman Refuses to Sign COVID-19 Self Quarantine Order So She and Hubby Required to Wear Ankle Monitor

Woman Refuses to Sign COVID-19 Self Quarantine Order So She and Hubby Required to Wear Ankle Monitors

Kentucky Governor , Andy Beshear , has issued such strict and controversial executive COVID orders that the state ’ s Attorney General tried to block them .
The Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that his orders could remain at least for the time being .
Now one couple is being penalized by their county health department for refusing to completely go along with the protocol .
Ky. couple on house arrest after not signing positive COVID-19 self-isolation order By Faith King | July 17 , 2020 at 11:23 PM EDT – Updated July 19 at 1:52 PM HARDIN COUNTY , Ky. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ couple is now on house arrest after one of them tested positive for COVID-19 and decided not to sign documents agreeing to self-quarantine .
Last week , Elizabeth Linscott got tested for the COVID-19 because she was planning to visit her parents in Michigan .
“ My grandparents wanted to see me , too , ” Linscott said .
“ So just to make sure if they tested negative , that they would be OK , everything would be fine.
” After testing positive but without showing any symptoms , Linscott said the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sign documents that will limit her traveling anywhere unless she calls the health department first .
She said she chose to not sign the documents .
I can ’ t be the only one wondering what will happen after The Linscotts get an attorney .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
Kentucky Governor, Andy Beshear, has issued such strict and controversial executive COVID orders that the state’s Attorney General tried to block them.
The Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that his orders could remain at least for the time being. Now one couple is being penalized by their county health department for refusing to completely go along with the protocol.
From WAVE3:
Ky. couple on house arrest after not signing positive COVID-19 self-isolation order By Faith King | July 17, 2020 at 11:23 PM EDT – Updated July 19 at 1:52 PM HARDIN COUNTY, Ky. (WAVE) – A Hardin County couple is now on house arrest after one of them tested positive for COVID-19 and decided not to sign documents agreeing to self-quarantine. Last week, Elizabeth Linscott got tested for the COVID-19 because she was planning to visit her parents in Michigan. “My grandparents wanted to see me, too,” Linscott said. “So just to make sure if they tested negative, that they would be OK, everything would be fine.” After testing positive but without showing any symptoms, Linscott said the health department contacted her and requested she sign documents that will limit her traveling anywhere unless she calls the health department first. She said she chose to not sign the documents. Read full article
I can’t be the only one wondering what will happen after The Linscotts get an attorney.
Image: Pixabay
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-07-19--The RAND Corporation and the New Manhattan Project

The RAND Corporation appears to have been central to the development of today ’ s New Manhattan Project .
Their founding and evolution involves many organizations and individuals associated with the project and they have been involved in many areas of research germane to the New Manhattan Project .
To learn all about today ’ s New Manhattan Project , please refer to the new , greatly revised and expanded second edition of the author ’ s book Chemtrails Exposed : A New Manhattan Project available exclusively at Amazon .
The story of the RAND Corporation During World War II @ @ @ @ @ @ @ became apparent .
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor , Nazi Germany ’ s superior aerospace capabilities , and other developments impressed upon American military leadership the need for a tremendous expansion of the Army Air Forces .
An Army Air Force general by the name of Henry ‘ Hap ’ Arnold ( 1886-1950 ) took up these challenges by the horns .
General Hap Arnold is already familiar to readers of this work .
He was responsible for the post-war series of reports titled Toward New Horizons , also known as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ laid out a path for this desired expansion of aerospace capabilities and resulted in the creation of something called the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board , which was tasked with carrying out the dictums of Toward New Horizons .
The RAND Corporation was formed as a sort of sister organization to the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board .
In this relationship , the RAND Corporation handled research and development of new technologies , while the Scientific Advisory Board evaluated RAND ’ s work and advocated for further production and implementation .
Arnold got @ @ @ @ @ @ @ September of 1945 from an Army Air Force test pilot by the name of Franklin R. Collbohm ( 1907-1990 ) .
Arnold and Collbohm had first met during the war when Collbohm furnished Arnold with radar technology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ( MIT ) .
With the end of hostilities and the impending dissolution of military science , Collbohm suggested to Arnold that an organization be created in order to retain and utilize scientists for military purposes as well as bypass a lot of bureaucratic red tape that had previously hindered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Shortly thereafter , a meeting at Hamilton Air Force Base in Marin County , California was convened in order to initiate the creation of such an organization .
Attending this meeting were : Arnold , Collbohm , the head of Douglas Aircraft , Donald Douglas ( 1892-1981 ) , the Vice President and Head of Engineering of Douglas Aircraft , Arthur E. Raymond ( 1899-1999 ) , and scientist Edward Bowles ( 1898-1990 ) of MIT .
At this meeting Arnold pledged to allocate $ 10M of unspent wartime funds to the Douglas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warfare called Project RAND .
RAND was short for ‘ research and development.
’ Collbohm was appointed as RAND ’ s first director .
RAND ’ s first headquarters were at the main Douglas Aircraft plant in Santa Monica , California .
Today their world headquarters are still located in Santa Monica , California .
In late December of 1945 , Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Research and Development General Curtis LeMay ( 1906-1990 ) began supervising the development of RAND .
LeMay , Collbohm , Raymond , and Bowles had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Mariana Islands .
Questions about conflicts of interest between the Douglas Aircraft Corporation and the Air Force soon arose .
So in May of 1948 , Collbohm called in San Francisco attorney Rowan Gaither ( 1909-1961 ) as a consultant .
It was Gaither ’ s job to advise the RAND Corporation ’ s administrators as to exactly how RAND should establish their independence from Douglas Aircraft .
Collbohm knew Gaither from the war when Gaither worked as the associate director in charge of administration at the MIT Radiation Laboratory and as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Committee .
Gaither ’ s job at the MIT Rad Lab was to coordinate the work of the staff and serve as a liaison between the Rad Lab and the military .
Gaither drew up a memorandum offering RAND ’ s administrators a range of options .
From all of the options presented , it was decided that RAND would break away from Douglas Aircraft as a nonprofit corporation , the first of its kind in America .
Air Force Chief of Staff Carl Spaatz ( 1891-1974 ) , who had previously served @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the plan .
Gaither then drafted RAND ’ s articles of incorporation and helped enlist men for RAND ’ s board of trustees .
Using his connections , Gaither also helped raise RAND ’ s original working capital from the Ford Foundation as well as the Wells Fargo Bank .
Gaither later went on to become the head of the Ford Foundation .
Gaither served as RAND ’ s chairman of the board until his death in 1961 .
Being that Gaither was so key to the founding of the RAND Corporation , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was also one of the original trustees of the later MITRE Corporation .
As regular readers of this work already know , the MITRE Corporation is the most probable executor of all of the scientific aspects of today ’ s New Manhattan Project .
In fact , the MITRE Corporation ’ s structure was modeled after the RAND Corporation ’ s and 5 out of the 10 members of MITRE ’ s first board of trustees were also executives at the RAND Corporation .
The RAND Corporation originally did work exclusively for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ went by , RAND began fulfilling contracts for many other organizations .
In fact , the RAND Corporation went on to fulfill contracts for just about every major organization implicated in the development of the New Manhattan Project .
RAND went on to do work for : Boeing , the Department of Defense , the Navy , the Atomic Energy Commission , the National Aeronautics and Space Administration , the Advanced Research Projects Agency ( ARPA/DARPA ) , the National Science Foundation , the Department of State , the Electric Power Research Institute @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Department of the Interior , the Travelers Companies , the Environmental Protection Agency , the CalTech Jet Propulsion Laboratory , the Central Intelligence Agency , the Carnegie Foundation , the Ford Foundation , and the Rockefeller Foundation .
RAND has also employed a plethora of individuals implicated in the New Manhattan Project .
These individuals include : Edward Teller ( 1908-2003 ) , Luis Alvarez ( 1911-1988 ) , George Kistiakowsky ( 1900-1982 ) , Samuel Cohen ( 1921-2010 ) , Charles Allen Thomas ( 1900-1982 ) , Lee A. DuBridge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( 1901-1994 ) , Ernest O. Lawrence ( 1901-1958 ) , John von Neumann ( 1903-1957 ) , Donald Rumsfeld , and Alfred Lee Loomis ( 1887-1975 ) .
Many of these individuals served on RAND ’ s board of trustees and most of them were involved in the original Manhattan Project .
In the decades since their founding , the RAND Corporation has issued many reports concerning weather modification .
Being that today ’ s New Manhattan Project is , in its essence , a global weather modification project , these reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
RAND began work on weather modification studies in 1962 .
In October of 1968 their Weather-Modification Research Project released a report titled “ Weather-Modification Progress and the Need for Interactive Research.
” The most important contributor to this report was a man by the name of R.E .
Huschke .
Shortly after asserting the catastrophic theory of man-made global warming , this report states that the exhaust from jet airplanes at altitude produces ‘ cirrus cloudiness ’ which can have an effect upon the earth ’ s temperature .
This is an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SRM geoengineering thesis as well as an argument in favor of chemtrails .
After writing about how unadulterated jet airplane exhaust creates atmospheric cloudiness ( it doesn ’ t , but let us continue ) , the authors of this report go further into the SRM geoengineering thesis by writing about actively seeding clouds in order to create cloudiness that can affect earth ’ s temperature .
In fact , the authors go so far as to sketch out the details of a program of large-scale SRM geoengineering .
The authors write , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been noted that the creation or dissipation of high cloudiness has an enormous influence on the heat budget of the atmosphere and of the surface .
Moreover , under certain conditions , only one kilogram of reagent can seed several square kilometers .
It is estimated that sixty C-5 aircraft could deliver one kg per km squared per day over the entire Arctic basin .
Thus , it is a large but not impossible task to seed such enormous areas .
Assuming that such seeding were effective in creating or dissipating clouds , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effect of such cloudiness on the heat budget of the surface/atmosphere system.
” The authors then go on to give more detail as to the technical aspects of such a program .
The authors of this report then call for action writing , “ The inadvertent influences of man ’ s activity will lead eventually to catastrophic effects on global climate unless ways can be developed to compensate for these undesired effects.
” As we know , they just laid out ways to compensate for these undesired effects .
They are calling for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chemtrails .
They make their point more explicitly as they write , “ The diversity of thermal processes that can be influenced in the atmosphere , and between the atmosphere and ocean , offers promise that if global climate is adequately understood it can be influenced for the purpose of either maximizing climatic resources or avoiding unwanted changes .
For example , to avoid undesired planetary warming , ways might be found to drain additional heat to space .
Regulating cloud cover , as suggested in an example above , is one possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Under their Dynamics of Climate Project , sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ( DARPA ) , the RAND Corporation studied climate from 1969-1975 .
RAND ’ s Dynamics of Climate Project involved the study of : atmospheric modeling , climatic experimentation and analysis , the gathering of climatic data , programming and use of the Illiac-IV ( a supercomputer of the time ) , assessment of international capacity for climate change research , and designing actions that might be taken to mitigate any future deleterious climatic changes .
The UCLA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the atmospheric modeling part of this project .
In the waning years of the Dynamics of Climate Project , the RAND Corporation established their RAND Climate Project in 1974 .
The RAND Climate Project went on to study computerized atmospheric models using the Iliac-IV supercomputer as well as ARPANET ( a precursor of today ’ s Internet ) .
The RAND Corporation was an early and extensive user of ARPANET .
The authors of a 1977 RAND report characterize variations in climate as , “ one of the outstanding unsolved problems in geophysics.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a solution to the climate problem , “ could be immensely valuable to man ’ s agricultural and commercial activities.
” RAND ’ s earliest investigations into satellites showed that they could be used as weather observation platforms .
They published a report about it in 1951 .
Tiros , the first dedicated weather satellite , came about in 1958 .
The RAND Corporation has also historically maintained a large bank of weather data known as the RAND Weather Data Bank .
The RAND Corporation published a 2011 report titled “ Governing Geoengineering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Analysis of Potential Near-term Options ” in which they advocate for SRM geoengineering and its regulation .
On their website , one may browse from a large collection of RAND Corporation reports pertaining to climate .
The RAND Corporation has done work in just about every area of scientific study pertinent to the New Manhattan Project .
During RAND ’ s early years , a variety of subjects germane to the NMP were studied including : atmospheric physics , optimal design of structures for military aircraft , air-traffic control , and high-energy radiation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have direct relevance to the NMP , such as : Aero-Astronautics , Computer Sciences , Electronics , Physics , Planetary Sciences , and System Operations .
RAND ’ s System Development Division provided computer programs for the SAGE system and developed training methods for SAGE crews .
This System Development Division became twice the size of the rest of RAND , so it was spun off in 1957 as the System Development Corporation , an independent , nonprofit corporate entity .
The SAGE system is of particular relevance to the New Manhattan Project @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of today ’ s NMP aircraft command and control systems .
A man by the name of Vernon L. Smith was a RAND consultant in 1959 .
Smith laid the theoretical foundations for the deregulation of energy markets in the United States as well as in Australia and New Zealand .
This is of note to our discussion because it was this deregulation of energy markets that allowed for the emergence of Enron .
Enron founded the weather derivatives market which has profound implications for today ’ s New Manhattan Project .
Smith @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Prize for economics .
The RAND Corporation ’ s Institute for Civil Justice is very interesting .
The RAND Corporation Institute for Civil Justice ( ICJ ) was founded in 1979 and conducts policy analysis of the civil justice system .
Its studies have looked at the justice system as a whole as well as particular types of litigation such as litigation pertaining to asbestos and professional malpractice .
In these matters , the ICJ has looked at alternative dispute resolution .
More than 50 RAND staffers and consultants from a broad range @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The ICJ receives funding for general support as well as for specific projects from a broad base of contributors in the public and private sectors .
With funding from the Ford Foundation as well as the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation , the ICJ has established a $ 3.5M endowment .
By the end of 1988 , the ICJ had received more than $ 20M and had spent almost all of that amount .
The director of the ICJ , Kevin F. McCarthy ( 1945-2015 ) authored or co-authored many papers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its aftermath .
The research director of the ICJ , Deborah R. Hensler is a renowned authority on class action lawsuits who has co-authored papers published by the RAND Corporation about asbestos litigation , mass personal injury litigation in general , as well as papers about alternative dispute resolution .
The types of litigation studied by RAND Corporation ’ s Institute for Civil Justice noted here have direct relevance to future litigation that might be filed pertaining to mass injuries inflicted upon the general public from the spraying of particulate matter from aircraft @ @ @ @ @ @ @ caused by weather disasters ; such as those which are part , or potentially part , of today ’ s New Manhattan Project .
Might the RAND Corporation ’ s Institute for Civil Justice be looking into the details of potential class action lawsuits arising from the New Manhattan Project ?
Quite a few individuals from organizations with potential ties to the New Manhattan Project have sat on the ICJ ’ s executive committee known as the ICJ Board of Overseers .
These individuals include : the chairman and CEO of the Travelers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ president of Marsh & McLennan , Robert Clements ; the president of the Alliance of American Insurers , Frank Nutter ; and the chairman of the board of the Dow Chemical Company , Paul Oreffice .
Soldiers of Reason : The RAND Corporation and the Rise of the American Empire a book by Alex Abella , published by Harcourt , 2008 Architects of American Air Supremacy : General Hap Arnold and Dr. Theodore von Karman – Conceptualizing the Future Air Force , Covering Rockets , Missiles , Jet Airplanes , Atomic Warfare , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , published by Progressive Management Publications , 1997 The Gaither Committee , Eisenhower , and the Cold War a book by David L. Snead , published by Ohio State University Press , 1999 Mitre : The First Twenty Years : A History of the MITRE Corporation ( 1958-1978 ) a book by the MITRE Corporation , published by the MITRE Corporation , 1979 “ The RAND Corporation : The First Fifteen Years ” a report by the RAND Corporation , published by the RAND Corporation , 1963 “ RAND 25th Anniversary Volume ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published by the RAND Corporation “ 40th Year : The RAND Corporation ” a report by the RAND Corporation , published by the RAND Corporation , 1988 The World as a Mathematical Game : John von Neumann and 20th Century Science a book by Giorgio Israel and Ana Millán Gasca , published by Birkhäuser , 2009 “ Weather-Modification Progress and the Need for Interactive Research ” a report by the RAND Corporation , published by the RAND Corporation , 1968 “ RAND/ARPA Climate Dynamics Research : Executive Summary and Final Report ” a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ RAND Corporation for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency , published by the RAND Corporation , 1977 “ Governing Geoengineering Research : A Political and Technical Vulnerability Analysis of Potential Near-term Options ” a report by Robert J. Lempert and Don Prosnitz , published by the RAND Corporation , 2011 “ The RAND Weather Data Bank ( RAWDAB ) : An Evolving Base of Accessible Weather Data ” a report prepared for the United States Air Force Project RAND by Esperanza Rodriguez and Ralph E. Huschke , published by the RAND Corporation , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Steemit page My GoodReads page My YouTube channel My BitChute channel Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael , CA researcher , author , and activist .
Please buy the greatly revised and expanded second edition of his book Chemtrails Exposed : A New Manhattan Project available now exclusively at Amazon .
Also please join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Peter A. Kirby
The RAND Corporation appears to have been central to the development of today’s New Manhattan Project. Their founding and evolution involves many organizations and individuals associated with the project and they have been involved in many areas of research germane to the New Manhattan Project. To learn all about today’s New Manhattan Project, please refer to the new, greatly revised and expanded second edition of the author’s book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project available exclusively at Amazon.
The story of the RAND Corporation
During World War II, the importance of air war capabilities became apparent. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Nazi Germany’s superior aerospace capabilities, and other developments impressed upon American military leadership the need for a tremendous expansion of the Army Air Forces. An Army Air Force general by the name of Henry ‘Hap’ Arnold (1886-1950) took up these challenges by the horns.
General Hap Arnold is already familiar to readers of this work. He was responsible for the post-war series of reports titled Toward New Horizons, also known as the von Kármán Reports. Toward New Horizons laid out a path for this desired expansion of aerospace capabilities and resulted in the creation of something called the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, which was tasked with carrying out the dictums of Toward New Horizons. The RAND Corporation was formed as a sort of sister organization to the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board. In this relationship, the RAND Corporation handled research and development of new technologies, while the Scientific Advisory Board evaluated RAND’s work and advocated for further production and implementation.
Arnold got the idea for the RAND Corporation in September of 1945 from an Army Air Force test pilot by the name of Franklin R. Collbohm (1907-1990). Arnold and Collbohm had first met during the war when Collbohm furnished Arnold with radar technology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). With the end of hostilities and the impending dissolution of military science, Collbohm suggested to Arnold that an organization be created in order to retain and utilize scientists for military purposes as well as bypass a lot of bureaucratic red tape that had previously hindered the development of new military technologies. Shortly thereafter, a meeting at Hamilton Air Force Base in Marin County, California was convened in order to initiate the creation of such an organization. Attending this meeting were: Arnold, Collbohm, the head of Douglas Aircraft, Donald Douglas (1892-1981), the Vice President and Head of Engineering of Douglas Aircraft, Arthur E. Raymond (1899-1999), and scientist Edward Bowles (1898-1990) of MIT. At this meeting Arnold pledged to allocate $10M of unspent wartime funds to the Douglas Aircraft Corporation for a study about future warfare called Project RAND. RAND was short for ‘research and development.’ Collbohm was appointed as RAND’s first director. RAND’s first headquarters were at the main Douglas Aircraft plant in Santa Monica, California. Today their world headquarters are still located in Santa Monica, California.
In late December of 1945, Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Research and Development General Curtis LeMay (1906-1990) began supervising the development of RAND. LeMay, Collbohm, Raymond, and Bowles had all previously worked together during WWII in the Mariana Islands.
Questions about conflicts of interest between the Douglas Aircraft Corporation and the Air Force soon arose. So in May of 1948, Collbohm called in San Francisco attorney Rowan Gaither (1909-1961) as a consultant. It was Gaither’s job to advise the RAND Corporation’s administrators as to exactly how RAND should establish their independence from Douglas Aircraft. Collbohm knew Gaither from the war when Gaither worked as the associate director in charge of administration at the MIT Radiation Laboratory and as a consultant to the National Defense Research Committee. Gaither’s job at the MIT Rad Lab was to coordinate the work of the staff and serve as a liaison between the Rad Lab and the military.
Gaither drew up a memorandum offering RAND’s administrators a range of options. From all of the options presented, it was decided that RAND would break away from Douglas Aircraft as a nonprofit corporation, the first of its kind in America. Air Force Chief of Staff Carl Spaatz (1891-1974), who had previously served under General Arnold, signed off on the plan. Gaither then drafted RAND’s articles of incorporation and helped enlist men for RAND’s board of trustees. Using his connections, Gaither also helped raise RAND’s original working capital from the Ford Foundation as well as the Wells Fargo Bank. Gaither later went on to become the head of the Ford Foundation. Gaither served as RAND’s chairman of the board until his death in 1961.
Being that Gaither was so key to the founding of the RAND Corporation, it is interesting to note that he was also one of the original trustees of the later MITRE Corporation. As regular readers of this work already know, the MITRE Corporation is the most probable executor of all of the scientific aspects of today’s New Manhattan Project. In fact, the MITRE Corporation’s structure was modeled after the RAND Corporation’s and 5 out of the 10 members of MITRE’s first board of trustees were also executives at the RAND Corporation.
The RAND Corporation originally did work exclusively for the Air Force. But as the years went by, RAND began fulfilling contracts for many other organizations. In fact, the RAND Corporation went on to fulfill contracts for just about every major organization implicated in the development of the New Manhattan Project. RAND went on to do work for: Boeing, the Department of Defense, the Navy, the Atomic Energy Commission, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA/DARPA), the National Science Foundation, the Department of State, the Electric Power Research Institute, the Office of Water Resources Research, the Department of the Interior, the Travelers Companies, the Environmental Protection Agency, the CalTech Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Carnegie Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation.
RAND has also employed a plethora of individuals implicated in the New Manhattan Project. These individuals include: Edward Teller (1908-2003), Luis Alvarez (1911-1988), George Kistiakowsky (1900-1982), Samuel Cohen (1921-2010), Charles Allen Thomas (1900-1982), Lee A. DuBridge (1901-1994), Julius A. Stratton (1901-1994), Ernest O. Lawrence (1901-1958), John von Neumann (1903-1957), Donald Rumsfeld, and Alfred Lee Loomis (1887-1975). Many of these individuals served on RAND’s board of trustees and most of them were involved in the original Manhattan Project.
RAND weather and climate
In the decades since their founding, the RAND Corporation has issued many reports concerning weather modification. Being that today’s New Manhattan Project is, in its essence, a global weather modification project, these reports are of particular interest to our discussion. RAND began work on weather modification studies in 1962.
In October of 1968 their Weather-Modification Research Project released a report titled “Weather-Modification Progress and the Need for Interactive Research.” The most important contributor to this report was a man by the name of R.E. Huschke. Shortly after asserting the catastrophic theory of man-made global warming, this report states that the exhaust from jet airplanes at altitude produces ‘cirrus cloudiness’ which can have an effect upon the earth’s temperature. This is an example of both the essence of the SRM geoengineering thesis as well as an argument in favor of chemtrails.
After writing about how unadulterated jet airplane exhaust creates atmospheric cloudiness (it doesn’t, but let us continue), the authors of this report go further into the SRM geoengineering thesis by writing about actively seeding clouds in order to create cloudiness that can affect earth’s temperature. In fact, the authors go so far as to sketch out the details of a program of large-scale SRM geoengineering. The authors write, “For example, it has already been noted that the creation or dissipation of high cloudiness has an enormous influence on the heat budget of the atmosphere and of the surface. Moreover, under certain conditions, only one kilogram of reagent can seed several square kilometers. It is estimated that sixty C-5 aircraft could deliver one kg per km squared per day over the entire Arctic basin. Thus, it is a large but not impossible task to seed such enormous areas. Assuming that such seeding were effective in creating or dissipating clouds, it is of interest to estimate the effect of such cloudiness on the heat budget of the surface/atmosphere system.” The authors then go on to give more detail as to the technical aspects of such a program.
The authors of this report then call for action writing, “The inadvertent influences of man’s activity will lead eventually to catastrophic effects on global climate unless ways can be developed to compensate for these undesired effects.” As we know, they just laid out ways to compensate for these undesired effects. They are calling for SRM geoengineering. They are calling for chemtrails.
They make their point more explicitly as they write, “The diversity of thermal processes that can be influenced in the atmosphere, and between the atmosphere and ocean, offers promise that if global climate is adequately understood it can be influenced for the purpose of either maximizing climatic resources or avoiding unwanted changes. For example, to avoid undesired planetary warming, ways might be found to drain additional heat to space. Regulating cloud cover, as suggested in an example above, is one possible way of approaching such a problem.”
Under their Dynamics of Climate Project, sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the RAND Corporation studied climate from 1969-1975. RAND’s Dynamics of Climate Project involved the study of: atmospheric modeling, climatic experimentation and analysis, the gathering of climatic data, programming and use of the Illiac-IV ( a supercomputer of the time), assessment of international capacity for climate change research, and designing actions that might be taken to mitigate any future deleterious climatic changes. The UCLA Department of Meteorology worked with RAND on the atmospheric modeling part of this project.
In the waning years of the Dynamics of Climate Project, the RAND Corporation established their RAND Climate Project in 1974. The RAND Climate Project went on to study computerized atmospheric models using the Iliac-IV supercomputer as well as ARPANET (a precursor of today’s Internet). The RAND Corporation was an early and extensive user of ARPANET.
The authors of a 1977 RAND report characterize variations in climate as, “one of the outstanding unsolved problems in geophysics.” They go on to write that a solution to the climate problem, “could be immensely valuable to man’s agricultural and commercial activities.”
RAND’s earliest investigations into satellites showed that they could be used as weather observation platforms. They published a report about it in 1951. Tiros, the first dedicated weather satellite, came about in 1958. The RAND Corporation has also historically maintained a large bank of weather data known as the RAND Weather Data Bank.
The RAND Corporation published a 2011 report titled “Governing Geoengineering Research: A Political and Technical Vulnerability Analysis of Potential Near-term Options” in which they advocate for SRM geoengineering and its regulation. On their website, one may browse from a large collection of RAND Corporation reports pertaining to climate.
The RAND Corporation has done work in just about every area of scientific study pertinent to the New Manhattan Project. During RAND’s early years, a variety of subjects germane to the NMP were studied including: atmospheric physics, optimal design of structures for military aircraft, air-traffic control, and high-energy radiation. Some of RAND’s departments have direct relevance to the NMP, such as: Aero-Astronautics, Computer Sciences, Electronics, Physics, Planetary Sciences, and System Operations.
RAND’s System Development Division provided computer programs for the SAGE system and developed training methods for SAGE crews. This System Development Division became twice the size of the rest of RAND, so it was spun off in 1957 as the System Development Corporation, an independent, nonprofit corporate entity. The SAGE system is of particular relevance to the New Manhattan Project as it is most probably the ancestor of today’s NMP aircraft command and control systems.
A man by the name of Vernon L. Smith was a RAND consultant in 1959. Smith laid the theoretical foundations for the deregulation of energy markets in the United States as well as in Australia and New Zealand. This is of note to our discussion because it was this deregulation of energy markets that allowed for the emergence of Enron. Enron founded the weather derivatives market which has profound implications for today’s New Manhattan Project. Smith was a co-recipient of the 2002 Nobel Prize for economics.
RAND’s Institute for Civil Justice
The RAND Corporation’s Institute for Civil Justice is very interesting. The RAND Corporation Institute for Civil Justice (ICJ) was founded in 1979 and conducts policy analysis of the civil justice system. Its studies have looked at the justice system as a whole as well as particular types of litigation such as litigation pertaining to asbestos and professional malpractice. In these matters, the ICJ has looked at alternative dispute resolution. More than 50 RAND staffers and consultants from a broad range of disciplines work on ICJ projects. The ICJ receives funding for general support as well as for specific projects from a broad base of contributors in the public and private sectors. With funding from the Ford Foundation as well as the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the ICJ has established a $3.5M endowment. By the end of 1988, the ICJ had received more than $20M and had spent almost all of that amount.
The director of the ICJ, Kevin F. McCarthy (1945-2015) authored or co-authored many papers published by RAND about Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath. The research director of the ICJ, Deborah R. Hensler is a renowned authority on class action lawsuits who has co-authored papers published by the RAND Corporation about asbestos litigation, mass personal injury litigation in general, as well as papers about alternative dispute resolution.
The types of litigation studied by RAND Corporation’s Institute for Civil Justice noted here have direct relevance to future litigation that might be filed pertaining to mass injuries inflicted upon the general public from the spraying of particulate matter from aircraft as well as those that might be caused by weather disasters; such as those which are part, or potentially part, of today’s New Manhattan Project. Might the RAND Corporation’s Institute for Civil Justice be looking into the details of potential class action lawsuits arising from the New Manhattan Project?
Quite a few individuals from organizations with potential ties to the New Manhattan Project have sat on the ICJ’s executive committee known as the ICJ Board of Overseers. These individuals include: the chairman and CEO of the Travelers Companies, Edward H. Budd; the president of Marsh & McLennan, Robert Clements; the president of the Alliance of American Insurers, Frank Nutter; and the chairman of the board of the Dow Chemical Company, Paul Oreffice.
References
Soldiers of Reason: The RAND Corporation and the Rise of the American Empire a book by Alex Abella, published by Harcourt, 2008
Architects of American Air Supremacy: General Hap Arnold and Dr. Theodore von Karman – Conceptualizing the Future Air Force, Covering Rockets, Missiles, Jet Airplanes, Atomic Warfare, Propulsion a book by Dik A. Daso, published by Progressive Management Publications, 1997
The Gaither Committee, Eisenhower, and the Cold War a book by David L. Snead, published by Ohio State University Press, 1999
Mitre: The First Twenty Years: A History of the MITRE Corporation (1958-1978) a book by the MITRE Corporation, published by the MITRE Corporation, 1979
“The RAND Corporation: The First Fifteen Years” a report by the RAND Corporation, published by the RAND Corporation, 1963
“RAND 25th Anniversary Volume” a report by the RAND Corporation, published by the RAND Corporation
“40th Year: The RAND Corporation” a report by the RAND Corporation, published by the RAND Corporation, 1988
The World as a Mathematical Game: John von Neumann and 20th Century Science a book by Giorgio Israel and Ana Millán Gasca, published by Birkhäuser, 2009
“Weather-Modification Progress and the Need for Interactive Research” a report by the RAND Corporation, published by the RAND Corporation, 1968
“RAND/ARPA Climate Dynamics Research: Executive Summary and Final Report” a report by W.L. Gates and the RAND Corporation for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, published by the RAND Corporation, 1977
“Governing Geoengineering Research: A Political and Technical Vulnerability Analysis of Potential Near-term Options” a report by Robert J. Lempert and Don Prosnitz, published by the RAND Corporation, 2011
“The RAND Weather Data Bank (RAWDAB): An Evolving Base of Accessible Weather Data” a report prepared for the United States Air Force Project RAND by Esperanza Rodriguez and Ralph E. Huschke, published by the RAND Corporation, March 1974
Links
PeterAKirby.com
My Minds page
My Steemit page
My GoodReads page
My YouTube channel
My BitChute channel
Websites
ClimateViewer.com
StopSprayingCalifornia.com
ChemSky.org
NuclearPlanet.com
GlobalSkyWatch.com
ChemtrailsProject.com
ChemtrailsProjectUK.com
ChemtrailSafety.com
GeoengineeringWatch.org
Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. Please buy the greatly revised and expanded second edition of his book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project available now exclusively at Amazon. Also please join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-07-20--Woman Refuses to Sign COVID-19 Self Quarantine Order So She and Hubby Required to Wear Ankle Monitor


activistpost--2020-07-19--E-Waste, Plastic, and More! “The Story of Stuff Project” Exposes What Happens to Discarded Stuff

For 11 years , The Story of Stuff Project has been producing and posting videos about what happens to all kinds of discarded stuff .
They recently released their first feature-length documentary film , The Story of Plastic .
Plastic pollution is everywhere we look , smothering our oceans and poisoning communities around the world .
Meanwhile , Big Plastic only plans to expand production .
Luckily , a global resistance movement is rising up to fight back .
Filmed across three continents and featuring never-before-seen footage from the front lines of the crisis , The Story of Plastic is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ll ever need to see , a seething expose of the true villains and heroes behind plastic pollution fight .
Directed by Deia Schlosberg and produced by Pale Blue Dot Media in association with React To Film .
Watch The Story of Plastic today or organize a free , virtual community screening !
For more information , visit the film website : Discarded plastic has been coming under heavy scrutiny this year .
PBS Frontline also released a film about it a few months ago .
Rolling Stone published a lengthy article about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In regard to other discarded stuff , The U.N. recently issued warnings that 82 % of E-Waste isn ’ t being recycled .
Remember that before you purchase , support , or turn a blind eye to sources of environmentally UNfriendly digital , electronic , and/or wireless technology ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ) including 5G and electric , gas and water utility “ Smart ” Meters .
Activist Post reports regularly about E-Waste and unsafe technology .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
For 11 years, The Story of Stuff Project has been producing and posting videos about what happens to all kinds of discarded stuff. They recently released their first feature-length documentary film, The Story of Plastic.
Plastic pollution is everywhere we look, smothering our oceans and poisoning communities around the world. Meanwhile, Big Plastic only plans to expand production. Luckily, a global resistance movement is rising up to fight back.
Filmed across three continents and featuring never-before-seen footage from the front lines of the crisis, The Story of Plastic is the last documentary about plastic you’ll ever need to see, a seething expose of the true villains and heroes behind plastic pollution fight. Directed by Deia Schlosberg and produced by Pale Blue Dot Media in association with React To Film.
Watch The Story of Plastic today or organize a free, virtual community screening! For more information, visit the film website: