activistpost--2020-12-31--Hidden in the COVID Relief Bill is an Order for the Pentagon to Disclose Its UFO Files Within 180 Da

Hidden in the COVID Relief Bill is an Order for the Pentagon to Disclose Its UFO Files Within 180 Days

The 5,593-page COVID-19 relief bill that was recently signed by US President Donald Trump was filled with unrelated issues and favors for special interests , with very little help for the people who are unemployed and struggling financially due to the pandemic .
Among the measures stuffed into the bill is a 180-day countdown for the Pentagon and other intelligence agencies to say what they know about UFOs .
The measure was not included in the text of the bill , but was instead listed as a “ committee comment , ” attached to the annual Intelligence Authorization act .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sen. Marco Rubio ( R-Fla. ) , said in the comment that it “ directs the [ director of national intelligence ] , in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of such other agencies … to submit a report within 180 days of the date of enactment of the Act , to the congressional intelligence and armed services committees on unidentified aerial phenomena.
” The measure demands that intelligence agencies provide a “ detailed analysis of unidentified phenomena data collected by : a. geospatial intelligence ; b. signals intelligence ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and signals intelligence.
” It is also requested that the US Federal Bureau Of Investigation ( FBI ) provide a “ detailed analysis of data of the FBI , which was derived from investigations of intrusions of unidentified aerial phenomena data over restricted United States airspace … and an assessment of whether this unidentified aerial phenomena activity may be attributed to one or more foreign adversaries.
” “ Consequently , it ’ s now fair to say that the request for an unclassified report on the UAP phenomenon enjoys the support of both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Assuming the Executive Branch honors this important request , the nation will at long last have an objective basis for assessing the validity of the issue and its national security implications .
This is an extraordinary and long overdue opportunity , ” Mellon added .
Nick Pope , who ran the “ UFO office ” of the UK ’ s Ministry of Defence , told The Post , Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe , Twitter and Gab .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By John Vibes
The 5,593-page COVID-19 relief bill that was recently signed by US President Donald Trump was filled with unrelated issues and favors for special interests, with very little help for the people who are unemployed and struggling financially due to the pandemic.
Among the measures stuffed into the bill is a 180-day countdown for the Pentagon and other intelligence agencies to say what they know about UFOs. The measure was not included in the text of the bill, but was instead listed as a “committee comment,” attached to the annual Intelligence Authorization act.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), said in the comment that it “directs the [director of national intelligence], in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of such other agencies … to submit a report within 180 days of the date of enactment of the Act, to the congressional intelligence and armed services committees on unidentified aerial phenomena.”
The measure demands that intelligence agencies provide a “detailed analysis of unidentified phenomena data collected by: a. geospatial intelligence; b. signals intelligence; c. human intelligence; and d. measurement and signals intelligence.”
It is also requested that the US Federal Bureau Of Investigation (FBI) provide a “detailed analysis of data of the FBI, which was derived from investigations of intrusions of unidentified aerial phenomena data over restricted United States airspace … and an assessment of whether this unidentified aerial phenomena activity may be attributed to one or more foreign adversaries.”
“Consequently, it’s now fair to say that the request for an unclassified report on the UAP phenomenon enjoys the support of both parties in both Houses of Congress. Assuming the Executive Branch honors this important request, the nation will at long last have an objective basis for assessing the validity of the issue and its national security implications. This is an extraordinary and long overdue opportunity,” Mellon added.
Nick Pope, who ran the “UFO office” of the UK’s Ministry of Defence, told The Post,
I welcome this move, which shows how seriously the phenomenon is being taken in the intelligence community. The Pentagon’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force is probably already drafting the report for DNI to send to the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Source: The Mind Unleashed
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe, Twitter and Gab.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-31--A Brief History of Genetic Vaccines (Part 1): Ebola

Most of the coronavirus vaccines are genetic potions of one kind or another , and so much time and money has gone into them , it seems a return on investment is now due .
Genetic vaccines are part of a huge industry based on synthetic versions of natural biology , with many prepped and ready to go .
Tracing back the history of DNA vaccines for HIV and Ebola begins to shed some light on how the coronavirus vaccines came into being .
This article ( Part 1 ) is about DNA vaccines for Ebola , e.g .
trials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and where people felt like lab rats , vaccine ingredients and genetic contaminants .
Part 2 will trace the endless failures of DNA vaccines for HIV over the last 30 years , and look at how HIV brought in the concept of testing for ‘ cases of suspected infection ’ .
On 12 November , 2019 , the World Health Organization ( WHO ) greased the wheels for Merck ’ s genetic Ebola vaccine as part of “ the fastest vaccine prequalification process ever conducted by WHO ” .
It ’ s said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Congo were given the vaccine during trials .
“ This is a historic step ….
” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus , WHO Director-General .
“ Five years ago , we had no vaccine and no therapeutics for Ebola .
With a prequalified vaccine and experimental therapeutics , Ebola is now preventable and treatable.
” In order to bring Merck ’ s vaccine , Ervebo , to market , the WHO worked with GAVI , the ‘ vaccine alliance ’ , and the European Medicines Agency ( EMA ) ; two days before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ granted Merck conditional marketing authorization for the vaccine , following a recommendation from the EMA .
African regulators “ have indicated they will quickly license the vaccine following the WHO recommendation ” .
Ervebo was also approved by the FDA on 19 December , 2019 .
Originally with the catchy name ‘ rVSV-ZEBOV ’ , the vaccine uses the vesicular stomatitis virus ( VSV ) as a way to get the fake DNA version of Ebola inside the cells of the body .
The VSV is recombinant ( genetically engineered ) and becomes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some genetic code hidden inside it that says “ Make Ebola proteins !
” This is supposed to mimic a natural infection , and the body is supposed to understand the man-made code and react accordingly .
The same method is being used by several other companies for all sorts of ‘ viral infections ’ ; most notably , the ronavax made by AstraZeneca and J & J , both of which use adenoviruses to carry the code for coronavirus proteins .
However , unlike the viral vectors used for the ronavax , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s able to multiply inside the person who ’ s been vaccinated .
To get a taste of how freaky the genetic concoctions get , take a look at some of the other ‘ medicines ’ being touted by the EMA ( all of which are being trialled in the DRC ) : • REGN-EB3 , a co-formulated cocktail of three human monoclonal antibodies against the Ebola virus glycoprotein • ZMAPP , an equimolar mixture of three mouse/human chimeric IgG1 , kappa mAbs .
The vaccine has to be stored in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ ERVEBO is a colorless to slightly brownish-yellow liquid with no particulates visible.
” The vaccine virus is delivered in a solution “ containing10 mM Tromethamine ( Tris ) and2.5 mg/mL rice-derived recombinant human serum albumin .
Each 1 mL dose may contain residual amounts of host cell DNA ( ≤10 ng ) and benzonase ( ≤15ng ) .
The vaccine may contain trace amounts of rice protein.
” It ’ s for people aged 18 years or more ; they ’ ve no idea how long it ’ ll make you produce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out of the body so can be spread around : Adverse reactions are said to include : Become an Activist Post Patron for just $ 1 per month at Patreon .
There were also reports of chills , paraesthesia , anaphylaxis , serious pyrexia reaction , severe arthritis and severe arthralgia .
‘ Study 5 ’ was a group of 24 people who developed arthritis , six of whom had “ recurrent or prolonged joint symptoms lasting up to 2 years following vaccination , the longest follow-up period.
” Two people in Study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of them had a rash , which seems to indicate shedding of the recombinant virus .
A separate study of 697 people assessed their white blood cell counts and found up to 85 % of them had decreases in lymphocytes , while 43 % had decreases in neutrophils .
There is no guarantee it won ’ t cause problems with pregnancy and it may well be in breast milk , since it is replication competent .
They don ’ t appear to have tested for this ; in fact , no tests for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which are all classed as ‘ biologics ’ .
Merck did a few tests on female rats , but other than that , “ ERVEBO has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity , genotoxicity or impairment of male fertility.
” Ervebo was first developed by the Public Health Agency of Canada , who licensed it to NewLink Genetics , who in turn licensed it to Merck in 2014 .
Even though Merck developed the vaccine with funding from GAVI , “ the knowledge on developing rVSV vaccines … remains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be used by anyone else wishing to develop a rVSV vaccine.
” It ’ s manufactured using the same cell line used for Rotateq , i.e .
Vero cells which are from the kidney of an African green monkey .
Ervebo was recently trialled during the “ the world ’ s second largest Ebola outbreak ” in the Democratic Republic of Congo ( DRC ) .
The outbreak lasted two years , and was declared “ over ” on 25 June , 2020. rVSV-ZEBOV was also trialled in Sierra Leone , and received @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trust , the UK Government , Médecins Sans Frontières , Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs , and the Canadian Government .
The trial was called ‘ Ebola ça Suffit !
which means , ‘ Ebola that ’ s enough !
; it was called a “ ring vaccination trial ” because it involved selectively vaccinating people based on who they ’ d been near : People were randomly assigned to clusters and some were vaxed and some were not .
The primary outcome was a ‘ laboratory confirmed case ’ of Ebola virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after inclusion in the trial .
Even though decisions were made about ‘ who to vaccinate ’ , not everybody agreed to take part in the experiment .
The Phase 3 trial saw 4,160 people getting the vaccine ; there were said to be 80 serious adverse events , two of which were “ judged to be related to vaccination ” .
The vaccine was also given to 2,016 front-line workers , and 70 % of them reported adverse events .
However , apart from saying that headache and fatigue were the most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ events are described , just dismissed as not ‘ vaccine-related ’ .
The front-line workers were all interviewed , and an in-depth analysis was made of their answers , including the people who declined to take part in the trial .
Some of their answers were described , and quoted , in a report ; for example , Some of the workers said they didn ’ t want to “ become lab rats ” for what they perceived as being the “ Ebola industry ” which was all about profit .
Other reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 5,837 vaccinees ( followed up for just twelve weeks ) , 53.9 % of them reported at least one adverse event in the first two weeks , and most but not all of them were ‘ mild ’ ; of the 80 reactions that were classified as serious adverse events , two were judged to be related to vaccination ( one person had “ a febrile reaction ” , another suffered anaphylaxis ) and one reaction was said to be ‘ possibly related ’ ( it was an “ influenza-like illness ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they say , these people were feeling better , so these reactions will be relegated to the dustbin along with all the ones ‘ deemed unrelated ’ .
Janssen is one of many companies trying to bring genetic vaccines to the market , with strong support from the World Health Organization .
In July , 2020 , J & J ’ s genetic Ebola vaccine received a Marketing Authorisation from the European Commission so it seems to be following hot on the heels of Merck .
After the World Health Organization ( WHO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it was given to more than 50,000 people in Rwanda and the Congo ( DRC ) .
The J & J vaccine also delivers the DNA in a genetically engineered virus , just like their coronavirus vaccine ( but with a different DNA insert ) and is called ‘ Ad26.ZEBOV ’ .
This is part of a ‘ vaccine regimen ’ where the J & J vaccine is given for the first dose , and then a slightly different version , ( in this case made by a different company ) , is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the one used second – about eight weeks after the J & J vax .
It ’ s made by Barvarian Nordic .
The J & J vax uses an adenovirus that ’ s engineered to be replication-deficient , and it contains the genetic instructions for the Zaire Ebola virus glycoprotein , while the Bavarian Nordic vax is a non-replicating , recombinant , modified vaccinia Ankara ( MVA ) vector-based vaccine , encoding glycoproteins from Zaire Ebola virus , Sudan virus , and Marburg virus , and nucleoprotein from the Tai Forest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is employed to engineer Ad26.ZEBOV ; this is a chimpanzee adenovirus vector produced in the human cell line PER.C6 ( meaning it ’ s grown in cells from an aborted foetus ) .
This makes it very similar to the ronavax made by AstraZeneca/Oxford University , except that they ’ re using cells from a different baby ( HEK293 ) .
An EMA document lists the ingredients of the J & J vax as being : sodium chloride , sucrose , polysorbate-80 , ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ( EDTA ) disodium dihydrate salt , L-histidine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ injection .
The method described above , where two different vaccines are used , has been employed in numerous trials for HIV and other viruses .
It ’ s classed as a prime-boost vaccine regimen and is similar to one used in trials by Oxford University .
They trialled their ChAdOx1 viral vector for TB ( the same vector used in the AstraZeneca ronavax ) in a prime-boost trial alongside MVA-85A ( a tuberculosis vaccine which reached a Phase 2b trial back in 2010 ) .
MVA stands for Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refers to the ‘ antigen ’ ( which in this case is the code for TB ) .
Several trials have employed this method .
Although “ the underlying mechanisms of the effectiveness of prime-boost strategy still remain poorly understood ” , this ‘ mixed modality ’ approach might be something government puppets insist on doing as part of the global experiment .
In January 2020 , there was a phase I trial in the UK using ChAdOx1 85A as the prime and then MVA85A as the ‘ boost ’ , in 42 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a BCG vaccine .
Most of them got flu-like symptoms , and there were issues with blood counts , such as lymphopaenia , as well as a case of shingles , but most adverse events were deemed unrelated , and therefore discounted .
One version of MVA , containing the S glycoprotein from MERS-CoV ( the 2012 ‘ outbreak ’ ) , was used to vaccinate mice in a lethal challenge experiment in 2015 ; the mice survived subsequent exposure to the disease , making this just one example of genetic vaccines being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unlike their ‘ conventional type ’ predecessors .
Trials of previous vaccines by J & J for meningitis , RSV , Ebola , Prostate cancer , and Staph .
aureus reached phase 1 , whilst trials of vaccines for malaria , TB , HCV , HIV and ‘ pandemic influenza ’ reached phase 2 .
Apart from the rona , J & J is currently using the Ad26 platform in vaccines for HIV , respiratory syncytial virus , and Zika .
For a long time , corporate giants have worked hard to prepare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all the technological mechanisms are in place to support full implementation of the United Nation ’ s oh-so-insincere SDGs .
Now that they ’ ve developed things like digital IDs , drones , electric cars , and fake meat , we ’ re expected to buy them .
Considering Big Pharma ’ s got a truck-load of highly unnatural products ready , it helps to see where the truck has come from and what ’ s on it .
The history of genetic vaccines adds context to the madness that ’ s landed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ronascam ; subsequent articles will dive into this a bit more , then go on to describe some of the bizarre ingredients , as well as the harm they could do you , and the genetic/molecular pathways through which this can occur .
Image : April 5 , 2017 : Study volunteer receives inoculation at Redemption Hospital in Monrovia , Liberia , during the opening days of PREVAC , a Phase 2 Ebola vaccine trial in West Africa .
Credit : NIAID/Wikimedia Commons Also read Julie Beal ’ s previous chronicle of genetic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe , Twitter and Gab .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Julie Beal
Most of the coronavirus vaccines are genetic potions of one kind or another, and so much time and money has gone into them, it seems a return on investment is now due. Genetic vaccines are part of a huge industry based on synthetic versions of natural biology, with many prepped and ready to go.
Tracing back the history of DNA vaccines for HIV and Ebola begins to shed some light on how the coronavirus vaccines came into being. This article (Part 1) is about DNA vaccines for Ebola, e.g. trials in Africa that used contact tracing, and where people felt like lab rats, vaccine ingredients and genetic contaminants. Part 2 will trace the endless failures of DNA vaccines for HIV over the last 30 years, and look at how HIV brought in the concept of testing for ‘cases of suspected infection’.
(All articles about the ronavax are at ActivistPost.com, with links to sources.)
The Green Light for a Genetic Vaccine
On 12 November, 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) greased the wheels for Merck’s genetic Ebola vaccine as part of “the fastest vaccine prequalification process ever conducted by WHO”. It’s said that more than 303,000 people in the Congo were given the vaccine during trials.
“This is a historic step ….” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. “Five years ago, we had no vaccine and no therapeutics for Ebola. With a prequalified vaccine and experimental therapeutics, Ebola is now preventable and treatable.”
In order to bring Merck’s vaccine, Ervebo, to market, the WHO worked with GAVI, the ‘vaccine alliance’, and the European Medicines Agency (EMA); two days before the WHO prequalification, the European Commission granted Merck conditional marketing authorization for the vaccine, following a recommendation from the EMA. African regulators “have indicated they will quickly license the vaccine following the WHO recommendation”. Ervebo was also approved by the FDA on 19 December, 2019.
Originally with the catchy name ‘rVSV-ZEBOV’, the vaccine uses the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) as a way to get the fake DNA version of Ebola inside the cells of the body. The VSV is recombinant (genetically engineered) and becomes a hybrid because it’s got some genetic code hidden inside it that says “Make Ebola proteins!” This is supposed to mimic a natural infection, and the body is supposed to understand the man-made code and react accordingly. The same method is being used by several other companies for all sorts of ‘viral infections’; most notably, the ronavax made by AstraZeneca and J&J, both of which use adenoviruses to carry the code for coronavirus proteins. However, unlike the viral vectors used for the ronavax, this one is replication competent, meaning it’s able to multiply inside the person who’s been vaccinated.
To get a taste of how freaky the genetic concoctions get, take a look at some of the other ‘medicines’ being touted by the EMA (all of which are being trialled in the DRC):
REGN-EB3, a co-formulated cocktail of three human monoclonal antibodies against the Ebola virus glycoprotein
mab114, a recombinant human IgG1 antibody against the Ebola virus glycoprotein
remdesivir, a prodrug of a modified adenine nucleoside analogue (called GS-441524)
ZMAPP, an equimolar mixture of three mouse/human chimeric IgG1, kappa mAbs.
THE ERVEBO PACKAGE INSERT
The vaccine has to be stored in a freezer, and once thawed, “ERVEBO is a colorless to slightly brownish-yellow liquid with no particulates visible.” The vaccine virus is delivered in a solution “containing10 mM Tromethamine (Tris) and2.5 mg/mL rice-derived recombinant human serum albumin. Each 1 mL dose may contain residual amounts of host cell DNA (≤10 ng) and benzonase (≤15ng). The vaccine may contain trace amounts of rice protein.”
It’s for people aged 18 years or more; they’ve no idea how long it’ll make you produce antibodies for, but it does come out of the body so can be spread around:
Vaccine virus RNA has been detected in blood, saliva, urine, and fluid from skin vesicles of vaccinated adults; transmission of vaccine virus is a theoretical possibility.”
Adverse reactions are said to include:
injection-site pain (70%), swelling (17%), and redness (12%). The most common systemic adverse events reported following vaccination with ERVEBO were headache (37%), feverishness (34%), muscle pain (33%), fatigue (19%), joint pain (18%), nausea (8%), arthritis (5%), rash (4%) and abnormal sweating (3%).
Become an Activist Post Patron for just $1 per month at Patreon.
There were also reports of chills, paraesthesia, anaphylaxis, serious pyrexia reaction, severe arthritis and severe arthralgia. ‘Study 5’ was a group of 24 people who developed arthritis, six of whom had “recurrent or prolonged joint symptoms lasting up to 2 years following vaccination, the longest follow-up period.” Two people in Study 5 had cutaneous vasculitis, and four of them had a rash, which seems to indicate shedding of the recombinant virus. A separate study of 697 people assessed their white blood cell counts and found up to 85% of them had decreases in lymphocytes, while 43% had decreases in neutrophils.
There is no guarantee it won’t cause problems with pregnancy and it may well be in breast milk, since it is replication competent. They don’t appear to have tested for this; in fact, no tests for genetic toxicity are required for genetic vaccines, which are all classed as ‘biologics’. Merck did a few tests on female rats, but other than that, “ERVEBO has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity or impairment of male fertility.”
Ebola Trials and Tribulations
Ervebo was first developed by the Public Health Agency of Canada, who licensed it to NewLink Genetics, who in turn licensed it to Merck in 2014. Even though Merck developed the vaccine with funding from GAVI, “the knowledge on developing rVSV vaccines … remains Merck’s, and cannot be used by anyone else wishing to develop a rVSV vaccine.” It’s manufactured using the same cell line used for Rotateq, i.e. Vero cells which are from the kidney of an African green monkey.
Ervebo was recently trialled during the “the world’s second largest Ebola outbreak” in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The outbreak lasted two years, and was declared “over” on 25 June, 2020. rVSV-ZEBOV was also trialled in Sierra Leone, and received funding from the WHO, UK Wellcome Trust, the UK Government, Médecins Sans Frontières, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Canadian Government. The trial was called ‘Ebola ça Suffit! which means, ‘Ebola that’s enough!; it was called a “ring vaccination trial” because it involved selectively vaccinating people based on who they’d been near:
After confirmation of a case of Ebola virus disease, we definitively enumerated on a list a ring (cluster) of all their contacts and contacts of contacts including named contacts and contacts of contacts who were absent at the time of the trial team visit.
People were randomly assigned to clusters and some were vaxed and some were not. The primary outcome was a ‘laboratory confirmed case’ of Ebola virus disease, occurring ten days or more after inclusion in the trial. Even though decisions were made about ‘who to vaccinate’, not everybody agreed to take part in the experiment. The Phase 3 trial saw 4,160 people getting the vaccine; there were said to be 80 serious adverse events, two of which were “judged to be related to vaccination”. The vaccine was also given to 2,016 front-line workers, and 70% of them reported adverse events. However, apart from saying that headache and fatigue were the most common, none of the serious adverse events are described, just dismissed as not ‘vaccine-related’.
The front-line workers were all interviewed, and an in-depth analysis was made of their answers, including the people who declined to take part in the trial. Some of their answers were described, and quoted, in a report; for example,
The otherworldly nature of the epidemic gave rise to many conspiracy theories, including that Ebola had been introduced by whites in order to eradicate the population, or that the epidemic was a ploy by the pharmaceutical companies that hoped to profit by forcing expedited (and perhaps less ethically stringent) vaccine trials and production.
Some of the workers said they didn’t want to “become lab rats” for what they perceived as being the “Ebola industry” which was all about profit.
Some were even suspicious that blood was not collected to determine vaccine performance, but instead was being used for other purposes, like screening Ebola patients for quarantine.
Other reports of adverse events said that, out of 5,837 vaccinees (followed up for just twelve weeks), 53.9% of them reported at least one adverse event in the first two weeks, and most but not all of them were ‘mild’; of the 80 reactions that were classified as serious adverse events, two were judged to be related to vaccination (one person had “a febrile reaction”, another suffered anaphylaxis) and one reaction was said to be ‘possibly related’ (it was an “influenza-like illness”); last time they checked, they say, these people were feeling better, so these reactions will be relegated to the dustbin along with all the ones ‘deemed unrelated’.
J&J — PRIMING AND BOOSTING
Janssen is one of many companies trying to bring genetic vaccines to the market, with strong support from the World Health Organization. In July, 2020, J&J’s genetic Ebola vaccine received a Marketing Authorisation from the European Commission so it seems to be following hot on the heels of Merck. After the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended its use in 2019, it was given to more than 50,000 people in Rwanda and the Congo (DRC).
The J&J vaccine also delivers the DNA in a genetically engineered virus, just like their coronavirus vaccine (but with a different DNA insert) and is called ‘Ad26.ZEBOV’. This is part of a ‘vaccine regimen’ where the J&J vaccine is given for the first dose, and then a slightly different version, (in this case made by a different company), is given as the second dose. MVA-BN-Filo is the one used second – about eight weeks after the J&J vax. It’s made by Barvarian Nordic. The J&J vax uses an adenovirus that’s engineered to be replication-deficient, and it contains the genetic instructions for the Zaire Ebola virus glycoprotein, while the Bavarian Nordic vax is a non-replicating, recombinant, modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vector-based vaccine, encoding glycoproteins from Zaire Ebola virus, Sudan virus, and Marburg virus, and nucleoprotein from the Tai Forest virus. Janssen’s AdVac® technology is employed to engineer Ad26.ZEBOV; this is a chimpanzee adenovirus vector produced in the human cell line PER.C6 (meaning it’s grown in cells from an aborted foetus). This makes it very similar to the ronavax made by AstraZeneca/Oxford University, except that they’re using cells from a different baby (HEK293). An EMA document lists the ingredients of the J&J vax as being: sodium chloride, sucrose, polysorbate-80, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) disodium dihydrate salt, L-histidine monohydrochloride monohydrate, ethanol and water for injection.
The method described above, where two different vaccines are used, has been employed in numerous trials for HIV and other viruses. It’s classed as a prime-boost vaccine regimen and is similar to one used in trials by Oxford University. They trialled their ChAdOx1 viral vector for TB (the same vector used in the AstraZeneca ronavax) in a prime-boost trial alongside MVA-85A (a tuberculosis vaccine which reached a Phase 2b trial back in 2010). MVA stands for Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara, and the ‘85A’ bit refers to the ‘antigen’ (which in this case is the code for TB).
Several trials have employed this method. Although “the underlying mechanisms of the effectiveness of prime-boost strategy still remain poorly understood”, this ‘mixed modality’ approach might be something government puppets insist on doing as part of the global experiment. In January 2020, there was a phase I trial in the UK using ChAdOx1 85A as the prime and then MVA85A as the ‘boost’, in 42 healthy adults who’d already had a BCG vaccine. Most of them got flu-like symptoms, and there were issues with blood counts, such as lymphopaenia, as well as a case of shingles, but most adverse events were deemed unrelated, and therefore discounted.
One version of MVA, containing the S glycoprotein from MERS-CoV (the 2012 ‘outbreak’), was used to vaccinate mice in a lethal challenge experiment in 2015; the mice survived subsequent exposure to the disease, making this just one example of genetic vaccines being said to avoid causing disease enhancement, unlike their ‘conventional type’ predecessors.
Trials of previous vaccines by J&J for meningitis, RSV, Ebola, Prostate cancer, and Staph. aureus reached phase 1, whilst trials of vaccines for malaria, TB, HCV, HIV and ‘pandemic influenza’ reached phase 2. Apart from the rona, J&J is currently using the Ad26 platform in vaccines for HIV, respiratory syncytial virus, and Zika.
In conclusion
For a long time, corporate giants have worked hard to prepare for a ‘world re-set’ – all the technological mechanisms are in place to support full implementation of the United Nation’s oh-so-insincere SDGs. Now that they’ve developed things like digital IDs, drones, electric cars, and fake meat, we’re expected to buy them. Considering Big Pharma’s got a truck-load of highly unnatural products ready, it helps to see where the truck has come from and what’s on it.
The history of genetic vaccines adds context to the madness that’s landed us slap-bang in the bowels of the ronascam; subsequent articles will dive into this a bit more, then go on to describe some of the bizarre ingredients, as well as the harm they could do you, and the genetic/molecular pathways through which this can occur.
Image: April 5, 2017: Study volunteer receives inoculation at Redemption Hospital in Monrovia, Liberia, during the opening days of PREVAC, a Phase 2 Ebola vaccine trial in West Africa. Credit: NIAID/Wikimedia Commons
Also read Julie Beal’s previous chronicle of genetic vaccines HERE.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe, Twitter and Gab.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-31--Want a Baby?  Experts Says Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Affects Fertility, Fetal Health, Pregnancy,

Want a Baby?  Experts Says Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Affects Fertility, Fetal Health, Pregnancy, and Sperm

Cell phones , laptops , and other wireless radiation emitting products include warnings in their manuals that carrying and holding these devices against the body may cause users to expose themselves to radiation levels that exceed federal RF safety limits .
Despite numerous requests from doctors and scientists , these limits haven ’ t been updated in 24 years ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) .
However , telecom companies seem to be aware of the dangers .
For many years they have warned investors that they could be held liable for harm caused by their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both telecom and tech companies often advertise unsafe use of their products to people of all ages .
Unfortunately , many businesses do .
Articles and warnings about cell phones and other wireless devices affecting fertility are NOT new .
Those aspiring to become parents may need a reminder though .
Thanks to Environmental Health Trust for publishing a 2012 presentation about this on their website .
Slides : Effects of prenatal and adult EMF exposure on brain development Effects of prenatal exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on the dentate gyrus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study .
Odaci , et al The effect of radiofrequency radiation on DNA and lipid damage in female and male infant rabbits .
Guler , et al Cell phone safety : The right to know about gray matters , Devra Davis Doctors ’ advice to patients and their families : Cell phones and Health : Simple precautions make sense , Environmental Health Trust Slides : Exposure to microwaves from mobile communication , DNA repair and cancer risk Role of physical and biological variables in bioeffects of non-thermal microwaves , Igor Belyaev Microwaves from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ human stem cells more strongly than in differentiated cells : Possible mechanistic link to cancer risk .
Markova , et al Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800-1900 Mhz-rated cellular telephones afets neurodevelopment and behavior in mice .
Aldad , et al Exposure limits : The underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation , especially in children .
Gandhi , et al Dr. De-Kun Li , MD , PhD , Senior Research Scientist , Division of Research , Kaiser Foundation Research Institute : A prospective study of in-utero exposure to magnetic fields and the risk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ al Update : Two videos are now available at the end of this page .
One is the webinar itself and the other is a video of the presentations given at the National Press Club event on November 12 , 2012 .
These presentations preceded the CHE EMF Working Group webinar featuring many of the same speakers .
Cell phones are a ubiquitous part of our lives .
But several new , independent studies confirm previous findings that pulsed digital signals from cell phones disrupt DNA , impair brain function and damage sperm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ particularly vulnerable , such that the American Academy of Pediatrics sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission asking for a review of the exposure limits .
The Government Accountability Office ( GAO ) recently issued a Report calling for an update of cell phone exposure limits .
The GAO recommended , “ FCC should formally reassess and , if appropriate , change its current RF energy exposure limit and mobile phone testing requirements related to likely usage configurations.
” FCC stated on page 40 of the GAO Report “ …the Commission ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ and the ] document is … under consideration by the Commission … ” On this webinar , we found out what the growing body of international science is telling us about the risks to pregnant women and sperm and prenatally exposed offspring from cell phone radiation .
The following global experts and eminent scientists from several countries discussed the new studies on this topic and offered suggestions as to what we can all do to counteract negative effects of cell phone use , especially for pregnant women , fetuses and men of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , professor at Ondokuz Mayis University , Samsun , Turkey , Department of Histology and Embryology , is a pioneer is the analysis of embryology and the author of a major paper published in the journal Brain Research showing that prenatal exposures to cellphone radiation in rats results in offspring with smaller brains with more brain damage and greater structural damage to their skulls .
Dr. Igor Belyaev , PhD , professor and head research scientist at Cancer Research Institute of Slovak Academy of Science , head research scientist at the Institute of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Dr. Belyaev has a doctorate in radiobiology from the Institute of Biophysics of Academy of Science of USSR , Pushchino , USSR ( 1986 ) and the DSc ( habilitation ) in Genetics from the Saint-Petersburg State University , Saint-Petersburg , Russia ( 1994 ) , associate professor in Genetic toxicology , Stockholm University , Sweden ( 2004 ) .
His professional research area is biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields and ionizing radiation , DNA damage and repair , chromosomal aberrations , apoptosis , molecular markers for radio sensitivity .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific publications and was on expert on the IARC workshop , which resulted in a finding that cell phone radiation is a possible carcinogen .
Dr. Devra Davis , PhD , MPH , lecturer , president and founder of Environmental Health Trust , is an award-winning , internationally renowned scientist who also was the founding director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the US National Research Council , National Academy of Sciences .
The author of 190 scientific publications , awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award from Green America for her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the author of Disconnect , selected by TIME magazine as a top pick , provides shocking detail about cell phone radiation and your health , and has received broad multi-media coverage on FOX , CNN , BBC , CBC , as well as on national programs in Canada , Finland , Holland , Germany , Korea and Japan .
Davis is influencing policy changes in Israel , France , Finland , the Netherlands , India , Russia , and Canada .
Nesrin Seyhan , PhD Gazi University , Turkey , professor and head @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the MSc and PhD degree programs in biophysics at the same university .
Additionally , she is the founder and director of Gazi Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection ( GNRP ) Center .
She is a Bioelectromagnetics Advisory Committee member for the World Health Organization ( WHO ) , and since 2001 , the National Representative for the WHO EMF International Advisory Committee since 2001 .
She is also a panel member , with the NATO Research Technology Organization ( RTO ) , Human Factors and Medicine ( HFM ) whose focus is the human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interests are non-ionizing radiation sources , standards and measurements , biological effects of ELF and RF EMF , including lipid peroxidation , immune system and collagen synthesis .
She is the author and co-author of two books and she has published 40 research articles .
Hugh Taylor , MD , PhD , Yale University , professor and chair of Obstetrics , Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences , and director of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility at the Yale University School of Medicine .
Dr. Taylor is a recipient of eight National Institutes of Health research @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reproductive Biology .
Dr. Taylor has published more than 125 articles in leading medical journals .
An award-winning scientist , he is the editor–In–chief of Reproductive Sciences and author of an important new study finding that prenatal exposures to cell phone radiation significantly alter brain chemistry and increase behavioral disorders in mice .
Due to the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy damage , Dr. Taylor will be participating via a YouTube video only .
Dr. Ronald Herberman , president for Research and Development TNI Bio Tech Inc. , Bethesda , Maryland , is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pittsburgh Cancer Institute .
From 1985-2009 he was the founding director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute ( UPCI ) and the UPMC Cancer Center and professor of medicine and biology .
From 1968 to 1985 he worked with the National Cancer Institute ( NCI ) , where he and colleague discovered natural killer ( NK ) cells .
Dr. Herberman has served on the Board of the American Association for Cancer Research .
He has received the Lifetime Science Award by the Institute for Advanced Studies in Immunology and Aging .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ American Association of Cancer Institutes and the Society for Biological Therapy and the Society for Natural Immunity .
Dr. Herberman will be participating via a YouTube video only .
On a related note – many doctors and scientists also support a petition boycotting 5G phones .
Activist Post reports regularly about unsafe technology .
For more information visit our archives .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Twitter and Gab .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
Cell phones, laptops, and other wireless radiation emitting products include warnings in their manuals that carrying and holding these devices against the body may cause users to expose themselves to radiation levels that exceed federal RF safety limits.
Despite numerous requests from doctors and scientists, these limits haven’t been updated in 24 years (see 1, 2, 3, 4). However, telecom companies seem to be aware of the dangers. For many years they have warned investors that they could be held liable for harm caused by their devices and transmitters. Even so – both telecom and tech companies often advertise unsafe use of their products to people of all ages. Unfortunately, many businesses do.
Articles and warnings about cell phones and other wireless devices affecting fertility are NOT new. Those aspiring to become parents may need a reminder though.
Thanks to Environmental Health Trust for publishing a 2012 presentation about this on their website.
2012 Experts Speak on Cell Phone Radiation, Pregnancy and Sperm
Slides & Resources
Speaker Presentation Slides and Materials
Süleyman Kaplan, MD
Slides: Effects of prenatal and adult EMF exposure on brain development
Effects of prenatal exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on the dentate gyrus of rats: a stereological and histopathological study. Odaci, et al
Nesrin Seyhan, PhD
Slides: Gazi non-ionizing radiation protection center and Gazi biophysics department
The effect of radiofrequency radiation on DNA and lipid damage in female and male infant rabbits. Guler, et al
Devra Davis, PhD, MPH
Slides: Cellphone toxicology, exposure assessment and epidemiology–an update
Slides: Expert forum: Cellphone radiation risk to prenancy and sperm
Cell phone safety: The right to know about gray matters, Devra Davis
Doctors’ advice to patients and their families: Cell phones and Health: Simple precautions make sense, Environmental Health Trust
Igor Belyaev, PhD
Slides: Exposure to microwaves from mobile communication, DNA repair and cancer risk
Role of physical and biological variables in bioeffects of non-thermal microwaves, Igor Belyaev
Microwaves from mobile phones inhibit 53BP1 focus formation in human stem cells more strongly than in differentiated cells: Possible mechanistic link to cancer risk. Markova, et al
Hugh Taylor, MD, PhD
Slides: Fetal cellphone exposure affects behavior
Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800-1900 Mhz-rated cellular telephones afets neurodevelopment and behavior in mice. Aldad, et al
EHHI report: The cell phone problem, February 2012
EHHI cell phone report summary
Ronald Herberman
Slides: Cellphone radiation risks–the case for precaution
Exposure limits: The underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children. Gandhi, et al
Additional Resources
Dr. De-Kun Li, MD, PhD, Senior Research Scientist, Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute: A prospective study of in-utero exposure to magnetic fields and the risk of childhood obesity. Li, et al
Update: Two videos are now available at the end of this page. One is the webinar itself and the other is a video of the presentations given at the National Press Club event on November 12, 2012. These presentations preceded the CHE EMF Working Group webinar featuring many of the same speakers.
Cell phones are a ubiquitous part of our lives. But several new, independent studies confirm previous findings that pulsed digital signals from cell phones disrupt DNA, impair brain function and damage sperm. Fetuses, children and teens are particularly vulnerable, such that the American Academy of Pediatrics sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission asking for a review of the exposure limits. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently issued a Report calling for an update of cell phone exposure limits. The GAO recommended, “FCC should formally reassess and, if appropriate, change its current RF energy exposure limit and mobile phone testing requirements related to likely usage configurations.” FCC stated on page 40 of the GAO Report “…the Commission’s staff … arrived at the same conclusion [and the] document is … under consideration by the Commission …”
On this webinar, we found out what the growing body of international science is telling us about the risks to pregnant women and sperm and prenatally exposed offspring from cell phone radiation.
Featured Speakers
The following global experts and eminent scientists from several countries discussed the new studies on this topic and offered suggestions as to what we can all do to counteract negative effects of cell phone use, especially for pregnant women, fetuses and men of reproductive age.
Süleyman Kaplan, MD, professor at Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey, Department of Histology and Embryology, is a pioneer is the analysis of embryology and the author of a major paper published in the journal Brain Research showing that prenatal exposures to cellphone radiation in rats results in offspring with smaller brains with more brain damage and greater structural damage to their skulls.
Dr. Igor Belyaev, PhD, professor and head research scientist at Cancer Research Institute of Slovak Academy of Science, head research scientist at the Institute of General Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences. Dr. Belyaev has a doctorate in radiobiology from the Institute of Biophysics of Academy of Science of USSR, Pushchino, USSR (1986) and the DSc (habilitation) in Genetics from the Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia (1994), associate professor in Genetic toxicology, Stockholm University, Sweden (2004). His professional research area is biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields and ionizing radiation, DNA damage and repair, chromosomal aberrations, apoptosis, molecular markers for radio sensitivity. He is coauthor of more than 80 scientific publications and was on expert on the IARC workshop, which resulted in a finding that cell phone radiation is a possible carcinogen.
Dr. Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, lecturer, president and founder of Environmental Health Trust, is an award-winning, internationally renowned scientist who also was the founding director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the US National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. The author of 190 scientific publications, awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award from Green America for her work on cellphone safety, Davis is the author of Disconnect, selected by TIME magazine as a top pick, provides shocking detail about cell phone radiation and your health, and has received broad multi-media coverage on FOX, CNN, BBC, CBC, as well as on national programs in Canada, Finland, Holland, Germany, Korea and Japan. Davis is influencing policy changes in Israel, France, Finland, the Netherlands, India, Russia, and Canada.
Nesrin Seyhan, PhD Gazi University, Turkey, professor and head of the Biophysics Department, founded both the MSc and PhD degree programs in biophysics at the same university. Additionally, she is the founder and director of Gazi Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (GNRP) Center. She is a Bioelectromagnetics Advisory Committee member for the World Health Organization (WHO), and since 2001, the National Representative for the WHO EMF International Advisory Committee since 2001. She is also a panel member, with the NATO Research Technology Organization (RTO), Human Factors and Medicine (HFM) whose focus is the human effects of non-lethal technologies. Her research interests are non-ionizing radiation sources, standards and measurements, biological effects of ELF and RF EMF, including lipid peroxidation, immune system and collagen synthesis. She is the author and co-author of two books and she has published 40 research articles.
Hugh Taylor, MD, PhD, Yale University, professor and chair of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, and director of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility at the Yale University School of Medicine. Dr. Taylor is a recipient of eight National Institutes of Health research grants and directs the Yale Center for Reproductive Biology. Dr. Taylor has published more than 125 articles in leading medical journals. An award-winning scientist, he is the editor–In–chief of Reproductive Sciences and author of an important new study finding that prenatal exposures to cell phone radiation significantly alter brain chemistry and increase behavioral disorders in mice. Due to the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy damage, Dr. Taylor will be participating via a YouTube video only.
Dr. Ronald Herberman, president for Research and Development TNI Bio Tech Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, is the founding director emeritus at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute. From 1985-2009 he was the founding director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (UPCI) and the UPMC Cancer Center and professor of medicine and biology. From 1968 to 1985 he worked with the National Cancer Institute (NCI), where he and colleague discovered natural killer (NK) cells. Dr. Herberman has served on the Board of the American Association for Cancer Research. He has received the Lifetime Science Award by the Institute for Advanced Studies in Immunology and Aging. He is the past president of the American Association of Cancer Institutes and the Society for Biological Therapy and the Society for Natural Immunity. Dr. Herberman will be participating via a YouTube video only.
CHE EMF Webinar: Experts Speak on Cell Phone Radiation, Pregnancy and Sperm, 11-12-12
On a related note – many doctors and scientists also support a petition boycotting 5G phones.
Activist Post reports regularly about unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe, Twitter and Gab.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.