activistpost--2020-05-02--More Young People with Alzheimer’s and Dementia:  Environmental Toxins – Not So Much Genetics – to B

More Young People with Alzheimer’s and Dementia:  Environmental Toxins – Not So Much Genetics – to Blame

It ’ s heart-breaking enough when elderly people develop memory-loss conditions .
Unfortunately , there are more reports being issued about young people developing them too .
Activist Post covered this in March and focused on how Electromagnetic Radiation exposure from wireless sources ( 5G , Bluetooth , cell phone radiation , and WiFi ) can play a role .
Thanks to Children ’ s Health Defense for providing more details about that as well as other contributing factors .
In late February , Blue Cross Blue Shield ( BCBS ) released a disturbing report describing the growing number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Alzheimer ’ s disease ( AD ) .
Analyzing the four-year period from 2013-2017 , BCBS reported a 200 % increase in diagnosed dementia and AD among commercially insured adults from ages 30 to 64 .
As of 2017 , approximately 15 % of the insured younger Americans who received one of the two diagnoses were in their thirties or early to mid-forties .
The BCBS results reinforce findings from previous studies .
In 2014 , UK researchers reported that the number of under-65 individuals developing dementia was “ double what was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ researchers looking at twenty-year dementia trends in the U.S. and other Western nations reported that dementias were starting “ a decade earlier than they used to.
” The downward creep of various types of dementia into younger age groups gives new meaning to the decades-old slogan popularized by the United Negro College Fund that “ a mind is a terrible thing to waste.
” With initial symptoms that may include “ depression , behavioural change , neurological disorders , systemic disorders and mild cognitive impairment , ” early-onset dementia can force individuals into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ An Irish study published in 2019 found that people with young-onset dementia “ most commonly die from complications of dementia ” versus other illnesses , even though nearly nine in ten also have at least one comorbid disease .
BCBS puts it this way : Younger adults living with dementia or AD “ are living at just 63 % of optimal health—leading to about 11 years of healthy life lost.
” Estimates suggest that while around 11 % of young-onset AD cases ( and perhaps 1 % of Alzheimer ’ s cases overall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ runs in families , the bulk of younger Alzheimer ’ s cases do not have a genetic explanation .
Not normal and ( mostly ) not genetic The Mayo Clinic notes that while age is a risk factor , dementia is not “ a normal part of aging.
” This observation is all the more pertinent when considering the individuals who develop dementia in their prime working-age years .
As with many other chronic conditions , researchers have tried to pin the blame for rising rates of dementia on genetics—largely without success .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of young-onset AD cases ( and perhaps 1 % of Alzheimer ’ s cases overall ) do have a genetic mutation that runs in families , the bulk of younger Alzheimer ’ s cases do not have a genetic explanation .
Moreover , AD is only a small piece of the broader dementia puzzle in those afflicted at younger ages .
Whereas the majority—well over half—of older adults ( 65 years ) with dementia have AD , Alzheimer ’ s accounts for only a third of younger dementia cases .
( Looked at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 6 % of all Americans with AD are under age 65 . )
More frequent forms of dementia in those under 65 include frontotemporal dementia—a nasty condition that produces loss of empathy , disinhibition , apathy , overeating and memory loss—and vascular dementia , which is linked to rampant chronic conditions such as obesity , diabetes and high blood pressure .
Interestingly , a growing body of research actually conceptualizes AD as type 3 diabetes or “ brain diabetes ” because of “ molecular and biochemical features that overlap ” with diabetes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ researchers , the strong link between neurodegenerative diseases and dementia points to environmental exposures rather than genetics as likely culprits .
If not genetics , then what ?
A study published in late 2019 assessed nongenetic risk factors for two types of young-onset dementia , considering a range of risks related to demographics , lifestyle and medical history .
The researchers found that nongenetic factors in combination conferred more risk than any single factor , with each additional exposure increasing the risk of midlife dementia by 28 % .
The authors concluded that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a lifetime of risk exposure starting from early in life.
” Still pushing the genetics theme , some researchers have suggested that childhood neurodegenerative conditions presumed to be genetic—such as mitochondrial disorders , enzyme-related disorders and abnormalities of the myelin sheath—sometimes crop up in delayed fashion and manifest as young-onset dementia in adulthood .
Of note , other studies have linked abnormal myelin development to “ psychopathology ” in adolescents and young adults .
For some researchers , the strong link between neurodegenerative diseases and dementia points to environmental exposures rather than genetics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study ( 1989-2010 ) of dementia trends in 55-74 year-old adults across 21 developed countries , the U.S. experienced the biggest increase ( 82 % ) in total neurological deaths—defined as “ Alzheimer and other dementias ” plus “ nervous disease ” deaths .
The U.S. went from a ranking of 17th in 1989 to having the second highest rate of 55-74 year-old dementia by 2010 .
To explain their dramatic results in both the U.S. and other countries , the lead author pointed a finger at environmental factors : The rate of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a silent or even a “ hidden ” epidemic , in which environmental factors must play a major part , not just aging .
.
.
.
[ T ] he changes in human morbidity , including neurological disease is [ sic ] remarkable and points to environmental influences .
[ .
.
. ]
The environmental changes in the last 20 years have seen increases in the human environment of petro-chemicals—air transport , quadrupling of motor vehicles , insecticides and rises in background electro-magnetic-field , and so on .
Some investigators cite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ common in children and adolescents—as another important contributor to early-onset dementia .
In a 2014 paper , Dr. Stephanie Seneff of MIT and lead author Wendy Morley coined the term “ diminished brain resilience syndrome ” to describe “ a modern day neurological pathway of increased susceptibility to mild brain trauma , concussion , and downstream neurodegeneration.
” The two placed the blame for the heightened vulnerability of young brains on multiple environmental and lifestyle factors , including exposure to glyphosate .
In a 2008 JAMA Neurology study of dementia occurring in individuals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was 34.7 years—the researchers linked 21 % of cases to autoimmune or inflammatory causes , including lupus , autoimmune encephalopathy and multiple sclerosis ( MS ) .
Cognitive symptoms , including dementia , are some of the oldest recognized signs of MS—a condition that involves demyelination—with full dementia present in roughly one in five MS patients .
… presents findings that are unequivocal in their confirmation of a role for aluminium in some if not all Alzheimer ’ s disease .
In the just-mentioned 2008 study in JAMA Neurology , 19 % of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ unknown etiology , despite exhaustive evaluation ” that sometimes included brain biopsy .
The researchers made no mention of the known neurotoxin aluminum as a potential contributor—a surprising omission given the 2001 publication of the book Aluminium and Alzheimer ’ s Disease : The Science that Describes the Link , edited by UK Professor Christopher Exley , one of the world ’ s foremost aluminum experts .
For decades , Exley and colleagues have tried to shine a spotlight on the role of aluminum in Alzheimer ’ s disease in the face @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The latest effort by Professor Exley and his group presents findings that are “ unequivocal in their confirmation of a role for aluminium in some if not all Alzheimer ’ s disease.
” The study found unprecedentedly high levels of aluminum in the brain tissue of persons who died with the type of AD associated with genetic mutations ( familial AD ) .
Exley speculates that these genetic predispositions may also predispose individuals to accumulate high levels of brain aluminum “ at a much younger age.
” In other work , Exley has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a “ catalyst ” for earlier-onset AD in people “ without concomitant predispositions , genetic or otherwise , ” and he proposes viewing AD “ as an acute response to chronic intoxication by aluminum.
” Professor Exley has also reported on the extraordinarily high levels of aluminum found in autism brain tissue .
Electromagnetic field ( EMF ) safety advocates have been raising questions for years about the link between cell phones and dementia at younger ages … Many of the conditions and exposures correlated with early-onset dementia—diabetes , obesity , autoimmune illness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and aluminum intoxication via vaccines—are occurring at epidemic levels in our children .
Electromagnetic fields ( EMFs ) are also a growing concern .
The scientific literature already links occupational EMF exposure to early-onset dementia .
EMF safety advocates have been raising questions for years about the link between cell phones and dementia at younger ages , particularly because of cell phones ’ effects on blood-brain barrier permeability .
Clearly , these questions have great significance for the developing brains of our cell-phone-enamored and wireless-saturated children .
Alzheimer ’ s disease alone is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , costing more than either heart disease or cancer .
If we do not turn the chronic disease epidemics around and diminish or eliminate children ’ s toxic exposures , chances are that the next study of early-onset dementia will present even more troubling results—and there will be fewer adults with the brain power to understand them .

By B.N. Frank
It’s heart-breaking enough when elderly people develop memory-loss conditions. Unfortunately, there are more reports being issued about young people developing them too. Activist Post covered this in March and focused on how Electromagnetic Radiation exposure from wireless sources (5G, Bluetooth, cell phone radiation, and WiFi) can play a role.
Thanks to Children’s Health Defense for providing more details about that as well as other contributing factors.
In late February, Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) released a disturbing report describing the growing number of younger American adults diagnosed with early-onset dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Analyzing the four-year period from 2013-2017, BCBS reported a 200% increase in diagnosed dementia and AD among commercially insured adults from ages 30 to 64. As of 2017, approximately 15% of the insured younger Americans who received one of the two diagnoses were in their thirties or early to mid-forties.
The BCBS results reinforce findings from previous studies. In 2014, UK researchers reported that the number of under-65 individuals developing dementia was “double what was previously thought.” The next year, researchers looking at twenty-year dementia trends in the U.S. and other Western nations reported that dementias were starting “a decade earlier than they used to.”
The downward creep of various types of dementia into younger age groups gives new meaning to the decades-old slogan popularized by the United Negro College Fund that “a mind is a terrible thing to waste.” With initial symptoms that may include “depression, behavioural change, neurological disorders, systemic disorders and mild cognitive impairment,” early-onset dementia can force individuals into early retirement and financial hardship—or worse. An Irish study published in 2019 found that people with young-onset dementia “most commonly die from complications of dementia” versus other illnesses, even though nearly nine in ten also have at least one comorbid disease. BCBS puts it this way: Younger adults living with dementia or AD “are living at just 63% of optimal health—leading to about 11 years of healthy life lost.”
Estimates suggest that while around 11% of young-onset AD cases (and perhaps 1% of Alzheimer’s cases overall) do have a genetic mutation that runs in families, the bulk of younger Alzheimer’s cases do not have a genetic explanation.
Not normal and (mostly) not genetic
The Mayo Clinic notes that while age is a risk factor, dementia is not “a normal part of aging.” This observation is all the more pertinent when considering the individuals who develop dementia in their prime working-age years. As with many other chronic conditions, researchers have tried to pin the blame for rising rates of dementia on genetics—largely without success. Estimates suggest that while around 11% of young-onset AD cases (and perhaps 1% of Alzheimer’s cases overall) do have a genetic mutation that runs in families, the bulk of younger Alzheimer’s cases do not have a genetic explanation.
Moreover, AD is only a small piece of the broader dementia puzzle in those afflicted at younger ages. Whereas the majority—well over half—of older adults ( > 65 years) with dementia have AD, Alzheimer’s accounts for only a third of younger dementia cases. (Looked at a different way, just 5% to 6% of all Americans with AD are under age 65.) More frequent forms of dementia in those under 65 include frontotemporal dementia—a nasty condition that produces loss of empathy, disinhibition, apathy, overeating and memory loss—and vascular dementia, which is linked to rampant chronic conditions such as obesity, diabetes and high blood pressure. Interestingly, a growing body of research actually conceptualizes AD as type 3 diabetes or “brain diabetes” because of “molecular and biochemical features that overlap” with diabetes types 1 and 2.
For some researchers, the strong link between neurodegenerative diseases and dementia points to environmental exposures rather than genetics as likely culprits.
If not genetics, then what?
A study published in late 2019 assessed nongenetic risk factors for two types of young-onset dementia, considering a range of risks related to demographics, lifestyle and medical history. The researchers found that nongenetic factors in combination conferred more risk than any single factor, with each additional exposure increasing the risk of midlife dementia by 28%. The authors concluded that some individuals with young-onset dementia “experience a lifetime of risk exposure starting from early in life.”
Still pushing the genetics theme, some researchers have suggested that childhood neurodegenerative conditions presumed to be genetic—such as mitochondrial disorders, enzyme-related disorders and abnormalities of the myelin sheath—sometimes crop up in delayed fashion and manifest as young-onset dementia in adulthood. Of note, other studies have linked abnormal myelin development to “psychopathology” in adolescents and young adults.
For some researchers, the strong link between neurodegenerative diseases and dementia points to environmental exposures rather than genetics as likely culprits. In a twenty-year study (1989-2010) of dementia trends in 55-74 year-old adults across 21 developed countries, the U.S. experienced the biggest increase (82%) in total neurological deaths—defined as “Alzheimer and other dementias” plus “nervous disease” deaths. The U.S. went from a ranking of 17th in 1989 to having the second highest rate of 55-74 year-old dementia by 2010. To explain their dramatic results in both the U.S. and other countries, the lead author pointed a finger at environmental factors:
The rate of increase in such a short time suggests a silent or even a “hidden” epidemic, in which environmental factors must play a major part, not just aging. . . . [T]he changes in human morbidity, including neurological disease is [sic] remarkable and points to environmental influences. [. . .] The environmental changes in the last 20 years have seen increases in the human environment of petro-chemicals—air transport, quadrupling of motor vehicles, insecticides and rises in background electro-magnetic-field, and so on.
Some investigators cite traumatic brain injuries (TBIs)—increasingly common in children and adolescents—as another important contributor to early-onset dementia. In a 2014 paper, Dr. Stephanie Seneff of MIT and lead author Wendy Morley coined the term “diminished brain resilience syndrome” to describe “a modern day neurological pathway of increased susceptibility to mild brain trauma, concussion, and downstream neurodegeneration.” The two placed the blame for the heightened vulnerability of young brains on multiple environmental and lifestyle factors, including exposure to glyphosate.
In a 2008 JAMA Neurology study of dementia occurring in individuals under age 45—whose average age of onset was 34.7 years—the researchers linked 21% of cases to autoimmune or inflammatory causes, including lupus, autoimmune encephalopathy and multiple sclerosis (MS). Cognitive symptoms, including dementia, are some of the oldest recognized signs of MS—a condition that involves demyelination—with full dementia present in roughly one in five MS patients.
… presents findings that are unequivocal in their confirmation of a role for aluminium in some if not all Alzheimer’s disease.
Let’s not forget aluminum
In the just-mentioned 2008 study in JAMA Neurology, 19% of dementia cases in younger patients were of “unknown etiology, despite exhaustive evaluation” that sometimes included brain biopsy. The researchers made no mention of the known neurotoxin aluminum as a potential contributor—a surprising omission given the 2001 publication of the book Aluminium and Alzheimer’s Disease: The Science that Describes the Link, edited by UK Professor Christopher Exley, one of the world’s foremost aluminum experts. For decades, Exley and colleagues have tried to shine a spotlight on the role of aluminum in Alzheimer’s disease in the face of massive industry pushback and denials.
The latest effort by Professor Exley and his group presents findings that are “unequivocal in their confirmation of a role for aluminium in some if not all Alzheimer’s disease.” The study found unprecedentedly high levels of aluminum in the brain tissue of persons who died with the type of AD associated with genetic mutations (familial AD). Exley speculates that these genetic predispositions may also predispose individuals to accumulate high levels of brain aluminum “at a much younger age.” In other work, Exley has suggested that aluminum may also act as a “catalyst” for earlier-onset AD in people “without concomitant predispositions, genetic or otherwise,” and he proposes viewing AD “as an acute response to chronic intoxication by aluminum.” Professor Exley has also reported on the extraordinarily high levels of aluminum found in autism brain tissue.
Electromagnetic field (EMF) safety advocates have been raising questions for years about the link between cell phones and dementia at younger ages …
Protecting children’s bodies—and minds
Many of the conditions and exposures correlated with early-onset dementia—diabetes, obesity, autoimmune illness, traumatic brain injury, glyphosate poisoning and aluminum intoxication via vaccines—are occurring at epidemic levels in our children. Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are also a growing concern. The scientific literature already links occupational EMF exposure to early-onset dementia. EMF safety advocates have been raising questions for years about the link between cell phones and dementia at younger ages, particularly because of cell phones’ effects on blood-brain barrier permeability. Clearly, these questions have great significance for the developing brains of our cell-phone-enamored and wireless-saturated children.
Alzheimer’s disease alone is already America’s most expensive disease, costing more than either heart disease or cancer. If we do not turn the chronic disease epidemics around and diminish or eliminate children’s toxic exposures, chances are that the next study of early-onset dementia will present even more troubling results—and there will be fewer adults with the brain power to understand them.


activistpost--2020-05-03--Hong Kong Airport Rolls Out Cleaning Robots And Full-Body Disinfection Booths

Activist Post Editor ’ s Note : While we vehemently disagree with this author ’ s conclusions , we ’ re bringing you this news strictly for the good reporting about the details of what air travel is starting to look like in the post-corona world .
Unless , of course , consumers refuse to subject themselves to this .
There is no denying the fact that the global pandemic has affected all the spheres of our lives and moving forward , some things will remain irreversibly changed .
With many new practices being implemented in our sanitation protocols , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ topped it all by launching cleaning robots and full-body disinfectant booths .
The booths , called Cleantech , are used for sanitizing and disinfecting people .
The entire process only takes a couple of minutes .
The person , before entering Cleantech , is checked for temperature .
Then they enter the booth where they are exposed to antimicrobial coating and sanitizers , killing any germs or viruses found on the surface of our cloth or body .
Cleantech uses the photocatalyst and “ nano-needles ” technology and can remotely disinfect any surface @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s website informs us that negative pressure is maintained in the channel to avoid any cross-contamination between the outside environment and the inside of the booth .
Although the antimicrobial coating is currently being used only by the airport employees involved in the sanitizing protocol , reports suggest that the coating will be introduced into public life soon .
The antimicrobial coating reportedly has also been tested on sensitive and vulnerable surfaces such as door handles , public transport buses , seats , and toilets .
The authorities claimed that after the test @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it permanently in their disinfection measures .
You might even be surprised if you see tall futuristic robots cleaning at the Hong Kong International Airport .
The autonomous robots are instructed to roam around the airport terminal and identify surfaces that are often used by the public and then sanitize and disinfect those areas .
You might encounter these cleaning robots in airport facilities , like the cafeteria or the public washroom .
The AAs claim that Intelligent Sterilisation Robots are capable of killing 99.99 percent of bacteria on any surface within just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ delivery , Hong Kong International Airport , Steven Yiu told the press that the safety and health security of the public and airport employees was paramount .
While lamenting the decline of the air travel economy in this dark time of the global pandemic , Yiu struck a positive chord and claimed that even though the traffic has substantially fallen , the Airport Authorities are ensuring that anyone who wants to travel , travels safely .
The concept of cleaning robots can be used in other airports as well .
The deputy director @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tirelessly and continue to brainstorm on new techniques to add to the sanitizing and disinfecting protocols .
So , whether you are ready or not , Artificial Intelligence has entered our daily life .
Resistance to science and technology is what has been hampering our efforts in flattening the curve .
The truth of the matter is that this pandemic requires a modern solution like cleaning robots .
The widespread disinfectant technologies will change healthcare forever .
Hey !
Message me .
I am Mayukh .
I help people and websites with content @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media management .
I am an avid traveler and I started living as a digital nomad in Europe since 2019 .
I am currently working on www.noetbook.com – a creative media company .
You can reach out to me anytime : [ email protected ] com Love , Mayukh Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Become an Activist Post Patron for as little as $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Mayukh Saha
Activist Post Editor’s Note: While we vehemently disagree with this author’s conclusions, we’re bringing you this news strictly for the good reporting about the details of what air travel is starting to look like in the post-corona world. Unless, of course, consumers refuse to subject themselves to this.
There is no denying the fact that the global pandemic has affected all the spheres of our lives and moving forward, some things will remain irreversibly changed.
With many new practices being implemented in our sanitation protocols, the International Airport in Hong Kong has topped it all by launching cleaning robots and full-body disinfectant booths.
The booths, called Cleantech, are used for sanitizing and disinfecting people. The entire process only takes a couple of minutes. The person, before entering Cleantech, is checked for temperature. Then they enter the booth where they are exposed to antimicrobial coating and sanitizers, killing any germs or viruses found on the surface of our cloth or body.
Cleantech uses the photocatalyst and “nano-needles” technology and can remotely disinfect any surface. The Hong Kong International Airport’s website informs us that negative pressure is maintained in the channel to avoid any cross-contamination between the outside environment and the inside of the booth.
Although the antimicrobial coating is currently being used only by the airport employees involved in the sanitizing protocol, reports suggest that the coating will be introduced into public life soon. The antimicrobial coating reportedly has also been tested on sensitive and vulnerable surfaces such as door handles, public transport buses, seats, and toilets. The authorities claimed that after the test run ends, they will consider introducing it permanently in their disinfection measures.
You might even be surprised if you see tall futuristic robots cleaning at the Hong Kong International Airport.
The autonomous robots are instructed to roam around the airport terminal and identify surfaces that are often used by the public and then sanitize and disinfect those areas. You might encounter these cleaning robots in airport facilities, like the cafeteria or the public washroom.
The AAs claim that Intelligent Sterilisation Robots are capable of killing 99.99 percent of bacteria on any surface within just 10 minutes.
Deputy director of service delivery, Hong Kong International Airport, Steven Yiu told the press that the safety and health security of the public and airport employees was paramount.
While lamenting the decline of the air travel economy in this dark time of the global pandemic, Yiu struck a positive chord and claimed that even though the traffic has substantially fallen, the Airport Authorities are ensuring that anyone who wants to travel, travels safely. The concept of cleaning robots can be used in other airports as well.
The deputy director promised that the Airport Authorities would work tirelessly and continue to brainstorm on new techniques to add to the sanitizing and disinfecting protocols.
So, whether you are ready or not, Artificial Intelligence has entered our daily life. Resistance to science and technology is what has been hampering our efforts in flattening the curve. The truth of the matter is that this pandemic requires a modern solution like cleaning robots. The widespread disinfectant technologies will change healthcare forever.
Image Credits: Hong Kong International Airport
Source: Truth Theory
Hey! Message me. I am Mayukh. I help people and websites with content, videos, design, and social media management. I am an avid traveler and I started living as a digital nomad in Europe since 2019. I am currently working on www.noetbook.com – a creative media company. You can reach out to me anytime: justmayukh@gmail. com Love, Mayukh
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Become an Activist Post Patron for as little as $1 per month at Patreon. Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-05-03--Researcher Says Actual Coronavirus Death Rate Likely ¾ to 1%  — “Full Measure” with Sharyl Attkisson

The coronavirus is no laughing matter .
For the last 2 months , there has been 24/7 media coverage of what is being considered a worldwide pandemic .
People everywhere can ’ t help but be freaked out and for a few good reasons – not just the fear of themselves , their loved ones , and their pets contracting the disease , being temporarily or permanently disabled , or even dying .
Steps being taken to stop the spread include the use of technology which completely invades our privacy IN ADDITION TO exposing us to harmful electromagnetic radiation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ carrying and/or wearing devices that also expose vulnerable patients to immunity reducing and illness-causing wireless sources !
Now one researcher is saying that there ’ s much less to worry about – at least health wise – than what has previously been reported and publicized about the coronavirus .
An update to our interview with Stanford scientist Jay Bhattacharya who worked on one of the first coronavirus antibody studies .
Sharyl : Early results in Santa Clara County , California show up to about four percent of people , 81,000 , had Covid-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number of infected could be 85 times higher than officials reported .
More studies are producing similar results .
In Miami-Dade County , Florida , about 6 percent have been infected , more than 16 times what had been reported .
In New York State , almost 15 % tested positive for antibodies .
In New York City , nearly 25 % .
Some say these test results are unreliable .
However , they are in line with published research as far back as February when a study found 81 % of coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ March , a study estimated 86 % of coronavirus infections are so mild they are never diagnosed .
One reason it matters , it makes the death rate much lower than figures released to the public all of these weeks .
By way of example , when the U.S. recently hit one million documented cases and 53,928 deaths , the fatality rate was 5.4 % .
But that could be more than seven times too high because it ignores the undiagnosed cases .
Factoring in those for a more accurate figure slashes the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one percent .
New York is testing thousands of police , fire department , health care and transit workers for antibodies .
And Georgia – they ’ re now testing in two counties .
So putting communities on lockdown seems unnecessary now , doesn ’ t it ?
Rushing for a global vaccine and requiring immunizations doesn ’ t seem necessary either .
We could find ourselves in an even worse position than back in the 1970s when the “ Swine Flu ” was also considered to be life-threatening on a massive scale @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vaccine and then a HUGE campaign to get people immunized .
That certainly didn ’ t end well .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Become an Activist Post Patron for as little as $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
The coronavirus is no laughing matter. For the last 2 months, there has been 24/7 media coverage of what is being considered a worldwide pandemic. People everywhere can’t help but be freaked out and for a few good reasons – not just the fear of themselves, their loved ones, and their pets contracting the disease, being temporarily or permanently disabled, or even dying. Steps being taken to stop the spread include the use of technology which completely invades our privacy IN ADDITION TO exposing us to harmful electromagnetic radiation. Even scarier – many healthcare workers are carrying and/or wearing devices that also expose vulnerable patients to immunity reducing and illness-causing wireless sources!
Now one researcher is saying that there’s much less to worry about – at least health wise – than what has previously been reported and publicized about the coronavirus.
From Full Measure:
An update to our interview with Stanford scientist Jay Bhattacharya who worked on one of the first coronavirus antibody studies.
Sharyl: Early results in Santa Clara County, California show up to about four percent of people, 81,000, had Covid-19 without knowing it. So the true number of infected could be 85 times higher than officials reported.
More studies are producing similar results. In Miami-Dade County, Florida, about 6 percent have been infected, more than 16 times what had been reported.
In New York State, almost 15% tested positive for antibodies. In New York City, nearly 25%.
Some say these test results are unreliable. However, they are in line with published research as far back as February when a study found 81% of coronavirus infections may not be detected.
In March, a study estimated 86% of coronavirus infections are so mild they are never diagnosed.
One reason it matters, it makes the death rate much lower than figures released to the public all of these weeks.
By way of example, when the U.S. recently hit one million documented cases and 53,928 deaths, the fatality rate was 5.4%. But that could be more than seven times too high because it ignores the undiagnosed cases. Factoring in those for a more accurate figure slashes the death rate to about three quarters of one percent.
New York is testing thousands of police, fire department, health care and transit workers for antibodies. And Georgia – they’re now testing in two counties.
So putting communities on lockdown seems unnecessary now, doesn’t it? Rushing for a global vaccine and requiring immunizations doesn’t seem necessary either. We could find ourselves in an even worse position than back in the 1970s when the “Swine Flu” was also considered to be life-threatening on a massive scale. There was also a rush for a vaccine and then a HUGE campaign to get people immunized. That certainly didn’t end well.

Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Become an Activist Post Patron for as little as $1 per month at Patreon. Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-05-03--Why You Should Oppose The Censorship Of David Icke (Hint: It’s Got Nothing To Do With Icke)

Within 48 hours both Facebook and then YouTube have deleted the accounts of David Icke for posting “ content that disputes the existence and transmission of Covid-19 as described by the WHO and the NHS.
” Other platforms may soon fall in suit , as they did with Alex Jones in 2018 .
This article is not about David Icke .
I will say it again in italics for the especially dense : this article is not about David Icke .
This article is about why we shouldn ’ t be okay with monopolistic billionaire-owned Silicon Valley tech giants with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ human communication .
I know next to nothing about David Icke , and I have done exactly zero research into his views for this article ; for all I know he ’ s every bit the raving lunatic the narrative managers say he is .
It doesn ’ t matter .
What matters is that we ’ re seeing a consistent and accelerating pattern of powerful plutocratic institutions collaborating with the US-centralized empire to control what ideas people around the world are permitted to share with each other , and it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conversation about Icke and his views distracts from the very important topic we need to actually focus on discussing .
Journalist Matt Taibbi recently wrote an excellent essay about the dangers inherent in the increased demand we ’ ve been seeing for more censorship and deplatforming during the coronavirus pandemic , correctly arguing that more authoritarian control over the ideas people are allowed to discuss is vastly more dangerous than the ideas themselves .
“ The people who want to add a censorship regime to a health crisis are more dangerous and more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ president who tells people to inject disinfectant , ” Taibbi writes .
“ It ’ s astonishing that they don ’ t see this.
” “ Instead of asking calmly if hydroxychloroquine works , or if the less restrictive Swedish crisis response has merit , or questioning why certain statistical assumptions about the seriousness of the crisis might have been off , we ’ re denouncing the questions themselves as infamous , ” says Taibbi .
Taibbi argues against the increasingly normalized trend of elevating “ authoritative ” content while silencing content which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an attempt to fight disinformation .
If you examine which content is considered “ authoritative ” , you ’ ll find a bunch of outlets who have consistently lied to the world about war after war , who spent years promoting the baseless conspiracy theory that Vladimir Putin had infiltrated and secured control over the executive branch of the US government , who consistently normalize a status quo which is wholly incompatible with the surviving and thriving of life on this planet .
Google , who owns YouTube , has been financially intertwined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inception when it received research grants from the CIA and NSA for mass surveillance .
Facebook ’ s Mark Zuckerberg has called on the government to take “ a more active role ” in regulating “ harmful content ” , and has been actively collaborating with government agencies and government-funded think tanks to decide what content to remove .
Social media executives are now routinely called before government hearings and lectured about the need to increase censorship under the implicit threat of antitrust cases being brought to bear .
These massive corporations now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ governments which refuse to bow to the demands of the US government and its allies .
In 2017 , representatives of Facebook , Twitter , and Google were instructed on the US Senate floor that it is their responsibility to “ quell information rebellions ” and adopt a “ mission statement ” expressing their commitment to “ prevent the fomenting of discord.
” “ Civil wars don ’ t start with gunshots , they start with words , ” the representatives were told .
“ America ’ s war with itself has already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the social media battlefield to quell information rebellions that can quickly lead to violent confrontations and easily transform us into the Divided States of America.
” Whenever anyone objects to censorship on these massive platforms they ’ re always told that those platforms are private companies who are free to do what they like on their private property , but how “ private ” is a corporation that is interlaced with government power with increasing inseparability ?
The reality is that in a corporatist system of government with vanishingly few meaningful distinctions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ corporate censorship is state censorship .
Proponents of increased internet censorship have already openly conceded this point .
A recent Atlantic article by two legal professors subtitled “ In the debate over freedom versus control of the global network , China was largely correct , and the U.S. was wrong ” , the case is made that western internet censorship will necessarily involve a collaboration with “ private ” corporations and government power .
“ As surprising as it may sound , digital surveillance and speech control in the United States already show @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authoritarian states such as China , ” the article ’ s authors favorably argue .
“ Constitutional and cultural differences mean that the private sector , rather than the federal and state governments , currently takes the lead in these practices , which further values and address threats different from those in China .
But the trend toward greater surveillance and speech control here , and toward the growing involvement of government , is undeniable and likely inexorable.
” Apart from the fact that they are here claiming that increasingly authoritarian speech control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bootlickers are absolutely correct .
Human communication is indeed being controlled using the so-called “ private sector ” to circumvent constitutional limitations which prohibit the government from censoring speech directly .
These Silicon Valley tech corporations have ensured their continued monopolistic dominance by demonstrating their willingness to collaborate with establishment power structures , so there are no platforms of anywhere near the same size and influence that people can move to if they don ’ t feel like letting government-tied plutocrats police what thoughts are permitted to enter into their minds .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to control the thoughts that people are allowed to share , discuss and think about in the same way totalitarian governments can , with the false mask of freedom plastered over it .
A truly free being does not need an alliance of plutocrats and government agencies to protect their mind from David Icke .
A truly free being does not want an alliance of plutocrats and government agencies to exert any control whatsoever over what ideas they are permitted to share and what thoughts they are permitted to think .
A truly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any attempt to lock in a paradigm where human communication ( and thereby thought ) is controlled by vast unaccountable power structures which benefit from the absence of dissent .
Be a truly free being .
Oppose this intrusion into your mental sovereignty .
Thanks for reading !
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website , which will get you an email notification for everything I publish .
My work is entirely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ piece please consider sharing it around , liking me on Facebook , following my antics onTwitter , checking out my podcast on either Youtube , soundcloud , Apple podcasts or Spotify , following me on Steemit , throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal , purchasing some of my sweet merchandise , buying my books Rogue Nation : Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone and Woke : A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers .
For more info on who I am , where I stand , and what I ’ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ click here .
Everyone , racist platforms excluded , has my permission to republish , use or translate any part of this work ( or anything else I ’ ve written ) in any way they like free of charge .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Become an Activist Post Patron for as little as $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Counter Markets today .

Op-Ed by Caitlin Johnstone
Within 48 hours both Facebook and then YouTube have deleted the accounts of David Icke for posting “content that disputes the existence and transmission of Covid-19 as described by the WHO and the NHS.” Other platforms may soon fall in suit, as they did with Alex Jones in 2018.
This article is not about David Icke. I will say it again in italics for the especially dense: this article is not about David Icke. This article is about why we shouldn’t be okay with monopolistic billionaire-owned Silicon Valley tech giants with extensive ties to US government agencies controlling human communication.
I know next to nothing about David Icke, and I have done exactly zero research into his views for this article; for all I know he’s every bit the raving lunatic the narrative managers say he is. It doesn’t matter. What matters is that we’re seeing a consistent and accelerating pattern of powerful plutocratic institutions collaborating with the US-centralized empire to control what ideas people around the world are permitted to share with each other, and it’s a very unsafe trajectory. Making this conversation about Icke and his views distracts from the very important topic we need to actually focus on discussing.
“The people who want to add a censorship regime to a health crisis are more dangerous and more stupid by leaps and bounds than a president who tells people to inject disinfectant.” https://t.co/KFA8jC6XiY — Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) April 30, 2020
Journalist Matt Taibbi recently wrote an excellent essay about the dangers inherent in the increased demand we’ve been seeing for more censorship and deplatforming during the coronavirus pandemic, correctly arguing that more authoritarian control over the ideas people are allowed to discuss is vastly more dangerous than the ideas themselves.
“The people who want to add a censorship regime to a health crisis are more dangerous and more stupid by leaps and bounds than a president who tells people to inject disinfectant,” Taibbi writes. “It’s astonishing that they don’t see this.”
“Instead of asking calmly if hydroxychloroquine works, or if the less restrictive Swedish crisis response has merit, or questioning why certain statistical assumptions about the seriousness of the crisis might have been off, we’re denouncing the questions themselves as infamous,” says Taibbi.
Taibbi argues against the increasingly normalized trend of elevating “authoritative” content while silencing content which does not wear that magical label in an attempt to fight disinformation. If you examine which content is considered “authoritative”, you’ll find a bunch of outlets who have consistently lied to the world about war after war, who spent years promoting the baseless conspiracy theory that Vladimir Putin had infiltrated and secured control over the executive branch of the US government, who consistently normalize a status quo which is wholly incompatible with the surviving and thriving of life on this planet.
Two weeks after the Atlantic Council explained to us that we need to be propagandized for our own good, Facebook announces a new partnership with the Atlantic Council to make sure we’re getting the right kinds of information.https://t.co/aXwHvxdREXhttps://t.co/3CkVtvBs0s pic.twitter.com/sEz52VjNTe — Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ (@caitoz) May 17, 2018
Google, who owns YouTube, has been financially intertwined with US intelligence agencies since its very inception when it received research grants from the CIA and NSA for mass surveillance. Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg has called on the government to take “a more active role” in regulating “harmful content”, and has been actively collaborating with government agencies and government-funded think tanks to decide what content to remove. Social media executives are now routinely called before government hearings and lectured about the need to increase censorship under the implicit threat of antitrust cases being brought to bear. These massive corporations now consistently censor with an extreme bias against governments which refuse to bow to the demands of the US government and its allies.
In 2017, representatives of Facebook, Twitter, and Google were instructed on the US Senate floor that it is their responsibility to “quell information rebellions” and adopt a “mission statement” expressing their commitment to “prevent the fomenting of discord.”
“Civil wars don’t start with gunshots, they start with words,” the representatives were told. “America’s war with itself has already begun. We all must act now on the social media battlefield to quell information rebellions that can quickly lead to violent confrontations and easily transform us into the Divided States of America.”
Whenever anyone objects to censorship on these massive platforms they’re always told that those platforms are private companies who are free to do what they like on their private property, but how “private” is a corporation that is interlaced with government power with increasing inseparability? The reality is that in a corporatist system of government with vanishingly few meaningful distinctions between corporate power and state power, corporate censorship is state censorship.
Narrative Managers Argue China-Like Internet Censorship Is Needed “The only difference between @TheAtlantic article and something you might read on a libertarian site is that this article argues that all of these regulations on speech are a good thing.”https://t.co/aXhhlQY366 — Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ (@caitoz) April 27, 2020
Proponents of increased internet censorship have already openly conceded this point. A recent Atlantic article by two legal professors subtitled “In the debate over freedom versus control of the global network, China was largely correct, and the U.S. was wrong”, the case is made that western internet censorship will necessarily involve a collaboration with “private” corporations and government power.
“As surprising as it may sound, digital surveillance and speech control in the United States already show many similarities to what one finds in authoritarian states such as China,” the article’s authors favorably argue. “Constitutional and cultural differences mean that the private sector, rather than the federal and state governments, currently takes the lead in these practices, which further values and address threats different from those in China. But the trend toward greater surveillance and speech control here, and toward the growing involvement of government, is undeniable and likely inexorable.”
Apart from the fact that they are here claiming that increasingly authoritarian speech control is good and necessary, these two bootlickers are absolutely correct. Human communication is indeed being controlled using the so-called “private sector” to circumvent constitutional limitations which prohibit the government from censoring speech directly.
These Silicon Valley tech corporations have ensured their continued monopolistic dominance by demonstrating their willingness to collaborate with establishment power structures, so there are no platforms of anywhere near the same size and influence that people can move to if they don’t feel like letting government-tied plutocrats police what thoughts are permitted to enter into their minds. This has given this corporate-government alliance the ability to control the thoughts that people are allowed to share, discuss and think about in the same way totalitarian governments can, with the false mask of freedom plastered over it.
A truly free being does not need an alliance of plutocrats and government agencies to protect their mind from David Icke. A truly free being does not want an alliance of plutocrats and government agencies to exert any control whatsoever over what ideas they are permitted to share and what thoughts they are permitted to think. A truly free being opposes with all their might any attempt to lock in a paradigm where human communication (and thereby thought) is controlled by vast unaccountable power structures which benefit from the absence of dissent.
Be a truly free being. Oppose this intrusion into your mental sovereignty.
Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics onTwitter, checking out my podcast on either Youtube, soundcloud, Apple podcasts or Spotify, following me on Steemit, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my sweet merchandise, buying my books Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone and Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Become an Activist Post Patron for as little as $1 per month at Patreon. Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-05-03--City Passes Ominous Ordinance that Could Land People in Jail for Filming the Police

Frequent readers of the Free Thought Project know that filming the cops is not a crime .
Despite this being a widely known provision — held up with multiple court precedents — cops continue to violate the First Amendment protected right of citizens to film the police .
Now , an entire city is going after people who wish to film police and it is nothing short of tyrannical .
A report from Tuscon.com claims a new ordinance was passed to deter “ cop-haters ” but in reality tramples the First Amendment .
According to the new legislation , ORDINANCE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ officers or Community Service Officers conducting enforcement activity , investigations , and other police-related activities may restrict 2 individuals from physically entering crime scenes or areas immediately surrounding where such enforcement activity , investigations , and other police-related activities are taking place .
Police Officers or Community Service Officers may establish the boundaries of a restricted area by using physical barriers , placing visual markers like caution tape , or expressly communicating that an area is temporarily restricted for police activity .
B .
If a Police Officer or Community Service Officer has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be unlawful for any person to enter the restricted area without a Police Officer ’ s or Community Service Officer ’ s express permission to enter ; or to refuse to comply with a Police Officer ’ s or Community Service Officer ’ s request or direction to leave the restricted area .
While section A sounds reasonable : not allowing people to film inside crime scenes , that is already the case , which is why crime scene tape exists .
However , it is section B that sounds particularly worrisome .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ establish a restricted area ” in order to claim a person has violated it before charging them with a crime .
Violations of this ordinance are considered a Class 2 misdemeanor punishable by a maximum $ 750 fine and arrest .
According to the Tuscon.com report : The City Council took action last week on a distinctly 21st century problem : people showing up at crime scenes with cellphones in hand , looking to create conflicts they can post online for profit .
It ’ s a trend seen by law enforcers around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Arizona Daily Star found in a review of court records and related documentation .
The provocateurs are part of a loose network of people who call themselves “ First Amendment auditors ” and claim they ’ re protecting the public ’ s right to monitor government activities .
About a dozen such people are operating in Arizona , a former participant told the Star .
It is important to point out that it is already illegal to interfere in police investigations .
Yelling at cops or heckling them while they do their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and if it reaches a certain level to where it endangers the officers , it should probably not be tolerated .
That being said , this ordinance and subsequent report completely ignore that fact that “ First Amendment auditors ” exist for the sole reason that cops continuously violate the First Amendment .
It is that simple .
The report and ordinance also fails to mention that in nearly all of these videos in which the auditors interact with police , it is the police who initiate the confrontation by questioning the auditor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
No one here is attempting to claim that assholes don ’ t exist and deliberately attempt to provoke cops , but the overwhelming majority of First Amendment auditors do not do this .
They remain silent , assert their rights , and it is the officer who is all too often the aggressor .
Instead of simply allowing a person to film without trampling their rights , in case after case , we see cops assault , arrest , and even threaten to kill people for filming them .
The bottom line @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s law enforcement have never liked public accountability and have consistently objected to laws that make it easier to hold them accountable .
From keeping body camera footage secret to passing ordinances like this one , cops will do everything in their power to make sure you can ’ t see what they don ’ t want you to see — even if it takes place in public spaces and directly affects you .
This law will undoubtedly be used by police to further oppress those who attempt to assert their right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accountable .
It is shameful and needs to be overturned immediately .
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA .
This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state .
Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world .
Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project .
Follow @ MattAgorist on Twitter , Steemit , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Become an Activist Post Patron for as little as $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Matt Agorist
Frequent readers of the Free Thought Project know that filming the cops is not a crime. Despite this being a widely known provision — held up with multiple court precedents — cops continue to violate the First Amendment protected right of citizens to film the police. Now, an entire city is going after people who wish to film police and it is nothing short of tyrannical.
A report from Tuscon.com claims a new ordinance was passed to deter “cop-haters” but in reality tramples the First Amendment. According to the new legislation, ORDINANCE NO. _11746:
A. Police officers or Community Service Officers conducting enforcement activity, investigations, and other police-related activities may restrict 2 individuals from physically entering crime scenes or areas immediately surrounding where such enforcement activity, investigations, and other police-related activities are taking place. Police Officers or Community Service Officers may establish the boundaries of a restricted area by using physical barriers, placing visual markers like caution tape, or expressly communicating that an area is temporarily restricted for police activity. B. If a Police Officer or Community Service Officer has established a restricted area, it shall be unlawful for any person to enter the restricted area without a Police Officer’s or Community Service Officer’s express permission to enter; or to refuse to comply with a Police Officer’s or Community Service Officer’s request or direction to leave the restricted area.
While section A sounds reasonable: not allowing people to film inside crime scenes, that is already the case, which is why crime scene tape exists. However, it is section B that sounds particularly worrisome. A police officer merely needs to “establish a restricted area” in order to claim a person has violated it before charging them with a crime. Violations of this ordinance are considered a Class 2 misdemeanor punishable by a maximum $750 fine and arrest.
According to the Tuscon.com report:
The City Council took action last week on a distinctly 21st century problem: people showing up at crime scenes with cellphones in hand, looking to create conflicts they can post online for profit. It’s a trend seen by law enforcers around the country and around the state, the Arizona Daily Star found in a review of court records and related documentation. The provocateurs are part of a loose network of people who call themselves “First Amendment auditors” and claim they’re protecting the public’s right to monitor government activities. About a dozen such people are operating in Arizona, a former participant told the Star.
It is important to point out that it is already illegal to interfere in police investigations. Yelling at cops or heckling them while they do their job can be construed as interfering; and if it reaches a certain level to where it endangers the officers, it should probably not be tolerated.
That being said, this ordinance and subsequent report completely ignore that fact that “First Amendment auditors” exist for the sole reason that cops continuously violate the First Amendment. It is that simple.
The report and ordinance also fails to mention that in nearly all of these videos in which the auditors interact with police, it is the police who initiate the confrontation by questioning the auditor’s right to film in public.
No one here is attempting to claim that assholes don’t exist and deliberately attempt to provoke cops, but the overwhelming majority of First Amendment auditors do not do this. They remain silent, assert their rights, and it is the officer who is all too often the aggressor.
Instead of simply allowing a person to film without trampling their rights, in case after case, we see cops assault, arrest, and even threaten to kill people for filming them.
The bottom line here is this: much of America’s law enforcement have never liked public accountability and have consistently objected to laws that make it easier to hold them accountable. From keeping body camera footage secret to passing ordinances like this one, cops will do everything in their power to make sure you can’t see what they don’t want you to see — even if it takes place in public spaces and directly affects you.
This law will undoubtedly be used by police to further oppress those who attempt to assert their right to film the police and hold them accountable. It is shameful and needs to be overturned immediately.
Source: The Free Thought Project
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Minds.
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Become an Activist Post Patron for as little as $1 per month at Patreon. Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-05-03--Sacramento Residents Oppose 5G Towers Near Homes and Few Are Subscribing – City DENIES Restrictions

Activist Post reported many times last year about 5G opposition in Sacramento , CA and also one family ’ s fight to get a small cell tower removed from in front of their home ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) .
An update from 5G Awareness paints a bleak picture : The City of Sacramento made their final decision to move forward with 4G/5G small cell installations in the Sacramento area WITHOUT implementing ANY the residential restrictions that our group had spent a year advocating for .
What ’ s worse , they made this decision @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public DID NOT have an opportunity to participate in .
What low-life scum !
!
!
Learn more here .
American municipalities CAN pass emergency ordinances to stop deployment during the pandemic .
It appears that Sacramento chose not to do so .
Since 2017 doctors and scientists have been requesting moratoriums on 5G deployment ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) .
Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals getting sick where it ’ s been turned on ( see 1 .
2 , 3 , 4 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been well documented in regard to humans ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) , animals and plants .
Some cities and countries have already taken action against deployment including banning it , passing ordinances ( see 1 , 2 ) , etc .
Unfortunately , many have not including in the U.S. despite opposition from the military .
Activist Post regularly reports about increasing 5G opposition in the U.S. and worldwide .
For more information , visit our archives and the following websites : Subscribe to Activist Post for truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Become an Activist Post Patron for as little as $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
Activist Post reported many times last year about 5G opposition in Sacramento, CA and also one family’s fight to get a small cell tower removed from in front of their home (see 1, 2, 3, 4). An update from 5G Awareness paints a bleak picture:
The City of Sacramento made their final decision to move forward with 4G/5G small cell installations in the Sacramento area WITHOUT implementing ANY the residential restrictions that our group had spent a year advocating for. What’s worse, they made this decision in an online City Council that the public DID NOT have an opportunity to participate in. What low-life scum!!! Learn more here.
American municipalities CAN pass emergency ordinances to stop deployment during the pandemic. It appears that Sacramento chose not to do so.
Since 2017 doctors and scientists have been requesting moratoriums on 5G deployment (see 1, 2, 3). Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals getting sick where it’s been turned on (see 1. 2, 3, 4). 5G and wireless radiation exposure risks have been well documented in regard to humans (see 1, 2, 3), animals and plants. Some cities and countries have already taken action against deployment including banning it, passing ordinances (see 1, 2), etc. Unfortunately, many have not including in the U.S. despite opposition from the military.
Activist Post regularly reports about increasing 5G opposition in the U.S. and worldwide. For more information, visit our archives and the following websites:
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Become an Activist Post Patron for as little as $1 per month at Patreon. Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-05-03--Dr. Tenpenny: This is The Biggest Scam Ever Perpetrated on The Human Race…

In this explosive interview , Spiro Skouras is joined by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny .
The two discuss the latest developments regarding the coronavirus situation which was declared a global health pandemic by the Gates-funded World Health Organization , as more information comes to light questioning the need for a global lockdown .
Dr. Tenpenny and Spiro examine and explore the motives of the global response by governments , global institutions and private interests , as Dr. Tenpenny exposes perhaps the most alarming aspect of the crisis yet !
No , it is not the virus , it is the blank @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manufacturers , which not only provides unlimited funding , but also provides blanket immunity to Big Pharma for any harm attributed with the treatments produced during the declared emergency , including all drugs and vaccines .
This blanket immunity is provided by the US government under the PREP Act and provides the drug and vaccine manufacturers the ‘ Ultimate Blank Check ’ during a declared emergency .
As Dr. Tenpenny points out , the vaccine and drug manufacturers have zero incentive to produce a safe product , as the declared emergency not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from any and all liability , but it also ensures the government will purchase their products .
This is an unprecedented level of immunity which raises many questions and safety concerns .
Coronavirus Pt 1 : How Soon We Forget – Same Playbook , Different Virus https : //vaxxter.com/same-play-book-different-virus/ Coronavirus Pt 2 : ‘ Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste ’ , Replay https : //vaxxter.com/coronavirus-pt-2-never-let-a-good-crisis-go-to-waste-replay/ Dr. Sherri Tenpenny : Responds to UNICEF putting her on the ANTI-VACCINE HIT LIST https : //vaccineliberationarmy.com/2013/09/28/dr-sherri-tenpenny-responds-to-unicef-putting-her-on-the-anti-vaccine-hit-lis/ What you need to know about the COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To Jail “ Anti-Vaxxers ” & The CDC Fear Based Talking Points To Media Revealed !
https : //www.activistpost.com/2020/02/new-proposed-law-to-jail-anti-vaxxers-the-cdc-fear-based-talking-points-to-media-revealed.html Coronavirus has mutated into at least 30 different strains new study finds https : //www.jpost.com/health-science/coronavirus-has-mutated-into-at-least-30-different-strains-new-study-finds-625333 As Business Owners Face Jail for Staying Open During Lockdown , “ High-Risk ” Child Rapists Set Free https : //www.activistpost.com/2020/05/as-business-owners-face-jail-for-staying-open-during-lockdown-high-risk-child-rapists-set-free.html

By Spiro Skouras
In this explosive interview, Spiro Skouras is joined by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny. The two discuss the latest developments regarding the coronavirus situation which was declared a global health pandemic by the Gates-funded World Health Organization, as more information comes to light questioning the need for a global lockdown.
Dr. Tenpenny and Spiro examine and explore the motives of the global response by governments, global institutions and private interests, as Dr. Tenpenny exposes perhaps the most alarming aspect of the crisis yet!
No, it is not the virus, it is the blank check issued to the vaccine and drug manufacturers, which not only provides unlimited funding, but also provides blanket immunity to Big Pharma for any harm attributed with the treatments produced during the declared emergency, including all drugs and vaccines.
This blanket immunity is provided by the US government under the PREP Act and provides the drug and vaccine manufacturers the ‘Ultimate Blank Check’ during a declared emergency. As Dr. Tenpenny points out, the vaccine and drug manufacturers have zero incentive to produce a safe product, as the declared emergency not only rolls back regulatory standards and removes them from any and all liability, but it also ensures the government will purchase their products.
This is an unprecedented level of immunity which raises many questions and safety concerns.
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Twitter Account
https://twitter.com/BusyDrT
Dr Tenpenny Vaxxter Website
https://vaxxter.com
Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act
https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/prepact/Pages/default.aspx
Coronavirus Pt 1: How Soon We Forget – Same Playbook, Different Virus
https://vaxxter.com/same-play-book-different-virus/
Coronavirus Pt 2: ‘Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste’, Replay
https://vaxxter.com/coronavirus-pt-2-never-let-a-good-crisis-go-to-waste-replay/
UN / UNICEF Report Against Dr. Tenpenny & other ‘Anti-Vaxxers’
https://www.unicef.org/eca/media/1556/file/Tracking%20anti-vaccination%20sentiment%20in%20Eastern%20European%20social%20media%20networks.pdf
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Responds to UNICEF putting her on the ANTI-VACCINE HIT LIST
https://vaccineliberationarmy.com/2013/09/28/dr-sherri-tenpenny-responds-to-unicef-putting-her-on-the-anti-vaccine-hit-lis/
What you need to know about the COVID-19 vaccine
https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/What-you-need-to-know-about-the-COVID-19-vaccine
SPECIAL BRIEFING: COULD A CORONAVIRUS VACCINE DESTROY THE ANTI-VAX MOVEMENT?
https://www.ozy.com/news-and-politics/special-briefing-the-coronavirus-vaccine-could-boost-or-destroy-the-anti-vax-movement/317945/
Hancock: compulsory vaccinations being seriously considered
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/sep/29/government-seriously-considering-compulsory-vaccinations-matt-hancock
New Proposed Law To Jail “Anti-Vaxxers” & The CDC Fear Based Talking Points To Media Revealed!
https://www.activistpost.com/2020/02/new-proposed-law-to-jail-anti-vaxxers-the-cdc-fear-based-talking-points-to-media-revealed.html
“One Conversation”, LIVE from Atlanta!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9bVeEwyxXk
“One Conversation”, LIVE from Atlanta! PART 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61MjmbELI84
Coronavirus has mutated into at least 30 different strains new study finds
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/coronavirus-has-mutated-into-at-least-30-different-strains-new-study-finds-625333
About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/about/index.html
PROJECT BIOSHIELD OVERVIEW
https://www.medicalcountermeasures.gov/barda/cbrn/project-bioshield-overview/
Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm
Cancer risk associated with simian virus 40 contaminated polio vaccine.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10472327
As Business Owners Face Jail for Staying Open During Lockdown, “High-Risk” Child Rapists Set Free
https://www.activistpost.com/2020/05/as-business-owners-face-jail-for-staying-open-during-lockdown-high-risk-child-rapists-set-free.html


activistpost--2020-05-04--Why You Should Oppose The Censorship Of David Icke (Hint: It’s Got Nothing To Do With Icke)