activistpost--2020-08-02--From Lockdowns to “The Great Reset”

From Lockdowns to “The Great Reset”

The lockdown in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic has accelerated the implementation of long-held plans to establish a so-called new world order .
Under the auspices of the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) , global policymakers are advocating for a “ Great Reset ” with the intent of creating a global technocracy .
It is not by coincidence that on October 18 , 2019 , in New York City the WEF participated in “ Event 201 ” at the “ high-level ” pandemic exercise organized by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security .
This coming technocracy involves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ digital industry and of governments .
With programs such as guaranteed minimum income and healthcare for all , the new kind of governance combines strict societal control with the promise of comprehensive social justice .
The truth , however , is that this new world order of digital tyranny comes with a comprehensive social credit system .
The People ’ s Republic of China is the pioneer of this method of surveillance and control of individuals , corporations , and sociopolitical entities .
For the individual , one ’ s identity is reduced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ almost any personal activity .
In order to gain a few individual rights , and be it only to travel to a certain place , a person must balance such apparent privileges with his submission to a web of regulations that define in detail what is “ good behavior ” and deemed as beneficial to humankind and the environment .
For example , during a pandemic , this sort of control would extend from the obligation of wearing a mask and practicing social distancing to having specific vaccinations in order to apply for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is , in short , a type of social engineering which is the opposite of a spontaneous order or of development .
Like the mechanical engineer with a machine , the social engineer—or technocrat—treats society as an object .
Different from the brutal suppressions by the totalitarianism of earlier times , the modern social engineer will try to make the social machine work on its own according to the design .
For this purpose , the social engineer must apply the laws of society the way the mechanical engineer follows the laws of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stage of knowledge that makes the dreams of social engineering possible .
The machinations of social engineering operate not through brute force , but subtly by nudge .
Under the order envisioned by the Great Reset , the advancement of technology is not meant to serve the improvement of the conditions of the people but to submit the individual to the tyranny of a technocratic state .
“ The experts know better ” is the justification .
The plan for an overhaul of the world is the brainchild of an elite group of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entourage that used to meet in Davos , Switzerland , in January each year .
Brought into existence in 1971 , the World Economic Forum has become a megaglobal event since then .
More than three thousand leaders from all over the world attended the meeting in 2020 .
Under the guidance of the WEF , the agenda of the Great Reset says that the completion of the current industrial transformation requires a thorough overhaul of the economy , politics , and society .
Such a comprehensive transformation requires the alteration of human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is part of the program .
See : 177 Different Ways to Generate Extra Income The Great Reset will be the theme of the fifty-first meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2021 .
Its agenda is the commitment to move the world economy toward “ a more fair , sustainable and resilient future.
” The program calls for “ a new social contract ” that is centered on racial equality , social justice , and the protection of the nature .
Climate change requires us “ to decarbonize the economy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ behavior “ into harmony with nature.
” The aim is to build “ more equal , inclusive and sustainable economies.
” This new world order must be “ urgently ” implemented , the promotors of the WEF claim , and they point out that the pandemic “ has laid bare the unsustainability of our system , ” which lacks “ social cohesion.
” The WEF ’ s great reset project is social engineering at the highest level .
Advocates of the reset contend that the UN failed to establish order in the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of sustainable development—known as Agenda 2030—because of its bureaucratic , slow , and contradictory way of working .
In contrast , the actions of the organizational committee of the World Economic Forum are swift and smart .
When a consensus has been formed , it can be implemented by the global elite all over the world .
The ideology of the World Economic Forum is neither left nor right , nor progressive or conservative , it is also not fascist or communist , but outright technocratic .
As such , it includes many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recent decades , the consensus has emerged at the annual Davos meetings that the world needs a revolution , and that reforms have taken too long .
The members of the WEF envision a profound upheaval at short notice .
The time span should be so brief that most people will hardly realize that a revolution is going on .
The change must be so swift and dramatic that those who recognize that a revolution is happening do not have the time to mobilize against it .
The basic idea of the Great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the radical transformations from the French to the Russian and Chinese Revolutions .
It is the idea of constructivist rationalism incorporated in the state .
But projects like the Great Reset leave unanswered the question of who rules the state .
The state itself does not rule .
It is an instrument of power .
It is not the abstract state that decides , but the leaders of specific political parties and of certain social groups .
Earlier totalitarian regimes needed mass executions and concentration camps to maintain their power .
Now , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is believed , dissenters can easily be identified and marginalized .
The nonconformists will be silenced by disqualifying divergent opinions as morally despicable .
The 2020 lockdowns possibly offer a preview of how this system works .
The lockdown worked as if it had been orchestrated—and perhaps it was .
As if following a single command , the leaders of big and small nations—and of different stages of economic development—implemented almost identical measures .
Not only did many governments act in unison , they also applied these measures with little regard for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Months of economic standstill have destroyed the economic basis of millions of families .
Together with social distancing , the lockdown has produced a mass of people unable to care for themselves .
First , governments destroyed the livelihood , then the politicians showed up as the savior .
The demand for social assistance is no longer limited to specific groups , but has become a need of the masses .
Once , war was the health of the state .
Now it is fear of disease .
What lies ahead is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comprehensive welfare state with a guaranteed minimum income and healthcare and education for all .
The lockdown and its consequences have brought a foretaste what is to come : a permanent state of fear , strict behavioral control , massive loss of jobs , and growing dependence on the state .
With the measures taken in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic , a big step to reset the global economy has been made .
Without popular resistance , the end of the pandemic will not mean the end of the lockdown and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ however , the opponents of the new world order of digital tyranny still have access to the media and platforms to dissent .
Yet the time is running out .
The perpetrators of the new world order have smelled blood .
Declaring the coronavirus a pandemic has come in handy to promote the agenda of their Great Reset .
Only massive opposition can slow down and finally stop the extension of the power grip of the tyrannical technocracy that is on the rise .
Dr. Antony P. Mueller is a German professor of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Write an e-mail .
See his website and blog .
Also See from Spiro at Activist Post : The Great Reset Plan Revealed : How COVID Ushers In The New World Order Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Antony P. Mueller
The lockdown in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic has accelerated the implementation of long-held plans to establish a so-called new world order. Under the auspices of the World Economic Forum (WEF), global policymakers are advocating for a “Great Reset” with the intent of creating a global technocracy. It is not by coincidence that on October 18, 2019, in New York City the WEF participated in “Event 201” at the “high-level” pandemic exercise organized by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
This coming technocracy involves close cooperation between the heads of the digital industry and of governments. With programs such as guaranteed minimum income and healthcare for all, the new kind of governance combines strict societal control with the promise of comprehensive social justice.
The truth, however, is that this new world order of digital tyranny comes with a comprehensive social credit system. The People’s Republic of China is the pioneer of this method of surveillance and control of individuals, corporations, and sociopolitical entities.
For the individual, one’s identity is reduced to an app or chip that registers almost any personal activity. In order to gain a few individual rights, and be it only to travel to a certain place, a person must balance such apparent privileges with his submission to a web of regulations that define in detail what is “good behavior” and deemed as beneficial to humankind and the environment. For example, during a pandemic, this sort of control would extend from the obligation of wearing a mask and practicing social distancing to having specific vaccinations in order to apply for a job or to travel.
It is, in short, a type of social engineering which is the opposite of a spontaneous order or of development. Like the mechanical engineer with a machine, the social engineer—or technocrat—treats society as an object. Different from the brutal suppressions by the totalitarianism of earlier times, the modern social engineer will try to make the social machine work on its own according to the design. For this purpose, the social engineer must apply the laws of society the way the mechanical engineer follows the laws of nature. Behavioral theory has reached a stage of knowledge that makes the dreams of social engineering possible. The machinations of social engineering operate not through brute force, but subtly by nudge.
Under the order envisioned by the Great Reset, the advancement of technology is not meant to serve the improvement of the conditions of the people but to submit the individual to the tyranny of a technocratic state. “The experts know better” is the justification.
The Agenda
The plan for an overhaul of the world is the brainchild of an elite group of businessmen, politicians, and their intellectual entourage that used to meet in Davos, Switzerland, in January each year. Brought into existence in 1971, the World Economic Forum has become a megaglobal event since then. More than three thousand leaders from all over the world attended the meeting in 2020.
Under the guidance of the WEF, the agenda of the Great Reset says that the completion of the current industrial transformation requires a thorough overhaul of the economy, politics, and society. Such a comprehensive transformation requires the alteration of human behavior, and thus “transhumanism” is part of the program.
The Great Reset will be the theme of the fifty-first meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2021. Its agenda is the commitment to move the world economy toward “a more fair, sustainable and resilient future.” The program calls for “a new social contract” that is centered on racial equality, social justice, and the protection of the nature. Climate change requires us “to decarbonize the economy” and to bring human thinking and behavior “into harmony with nature.” The aim is to build “more equal, inclusive and sustainable economies.” This new world order must be “urgently” implemented, the promotors of the WEF claim, and they point out that the pandemic “has laid bare the unsustainability of our system,” which lacks “social cohesion.”
The WEF’s great reset project is social engineering at the highest level. Advocates of the reset contend that the UN failed to establish order in the world and could not advance forcefully its agenda of sustainable development—known as Agenda 2030—because of its bureaucratic, slow, and contradictory way of working. In contrast, the actions of the organizational committee of the World Economic Forum are swift and smart. When a consensus has been formed, it can be implemented by the global elite all over the world.
Social Engineering
The ideology of the World Economic Forum is neither left nor right, nor progressive or conservative, it is also not fascist or communist, but outright technocratic. As such, it includes many elements of earlier collectivist ideologies.
In recent decades, the consensus has emerged at the annual Davos meetings that the world needs a revolution, and that reforms have taken too long. The members of the WEF envision a profound upheaval at short notice. The time span should be so brief that most people will hardly realize that a revolution is going on. The change must be so swift and dramatic that those who recognize that a revolution is happening do not have the time to mobilize against it.
The basic idea of the Great Reset is the same principle that guided the radical transformations from the French to the Russian and Chinese Revolutions. It is the idea of constructivist rationalism incorporated in the state. But projects like the Great Reset leave unanswered the question of who rules the state. The state itself does not rule. It is an instrument of power. It is not the abstract state that decides, but the leaders of specific political parties and of certain social groups.
Earlier totalitarian regimes needed mass executions and concentration camps to maintain their power. Now, with the help of new technologies, it is believed, dissenters can easily be identified and marginalized. The nonconformists will be silenced by disqualifying divergent opinions as morally despicable.
The 2020 lockdowns possibly offer a preview of how this system works. The lockdown worked as if it had been orchestrated—and perhaps it was. As if following a single command, the leaders of big and small nations—and of different stages of economic development—implemented almost identical measures. Not only did many governments act in unison, they also applied these measures with little regard for the horrific consequences of a global lockdown.
Months of economic standstill have destroyed the economic basis of millions of families. Together with social distancing, the lockdown has produced a mass of people unable to care for themselves. First, governments destroyed the livelihood, then the politicians showed up as the savior. The demand for social assistance is no longer limited to specific groups, but has become a need of the masses.
Once, war was the health of the state. Now it is fear of disease. What lies ahead is not the apparent coziness of a benevolent comprehensive welfare state with a guaranteed minimum income and healthcare and education for all. The lockdown and its consequences have brought a foretaste what is to come: a permanent state of fear, strict behavioral control, massive loss of jobs, and growing dependence on the state.
With the measures taken in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, a big step to reset the global economy has been made. Without popular resistance, the end of the pandemic will not mean the end of the lockdown and social distancing. At the moment, however, the opponents of the new world order of digital tyranny still have access to the media and platforms to dissent. Yet the time is running out. The perpetrators of the new world order have smelled blood. Declaring the coronavirus a pandemic has come in handy to promote the agenda of their Great Reset. Only massive opposition can slow down and finally stop the extension of the power grip of the tyrannical technocracy that is on the rise.
Source: Mises.org
Dr. Antony P. Mueller is a German professor of economics who currently teaches in Brazil. Write an e-mail. See his website and blog.
Also See from Spiro at Activist Post: The Great Reset Plan Revealed: How COVID Ushers In The New World Order
Image: Spiro Skouras
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-08-03--Protesting Germans Revolt Against “Muzzle” Facemasks And Pandemic Restrictions

Thousands of Germans took to the streets of Berlin on Saturday to protest the country ’ s coronavirus measures – including wearing facemasks – which the protesters refer to as a “ muzzle.
” “ Our demand is to go back to democracy .
Away with these laws that have been imposed on us , away with the masks that make us slave , ” said one woman , according to the BBC .
The protesters are a mix of ‘ far right ’ and ‘ ordinary people who simply object to the government ’ s approach to the pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Damian McGuinness , who added that hardly anyone was wearing a face-covering or social distancing during the demonstration .
Germany has had over 210,000 cases of COVID-19 and over 9,000 deaths linked to the disease since the beginning of the pandemic .
Despite recording 900 new cases on Friday , Germany remains one of the least affected European countries .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Tyler Durden
Thousands of Germans took to the streets of Berlin on Saturday to protest the country’s coronavirus measures – including wearing facemasks – which the protesters refer to as a “muzzle.”
Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands protest peacefully in Berlin against #COVID19 restrictions in Germany. Protesters chant "We are the people. We are fed up. Stop with the lies. Today marks the end of the pandemic." pic.twitter.com/K9gtTtqPd7 — Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) August 1, 2020
“Our demand is to go back to democracy. Away with these laws that have been imposed on us, away with the masks that make us slave,” said one woman, according to the BBC.
Restrictions in Germany include the wearing of face-coverings in shops and on public transport, social distancing rules and hygiene requirements apply throughout the country. Mandatory testing has been introduced for holidaymakers returning from high-risk areas. –BBC
The protesters are a mix of ‘far right’ and ‘ordinary people who simply object to the government’s approach to the pandemic,’ according to the BBC‘s Damian McGuinness, who added that hardly anyone was wearing a face-covering or social distancing during the demonstration.
Germany has had over 210,000 cases of COVID-19 and over 9,000 deaths linked to the disease since the beginning of the pandemic. Despite recording 900 new cases on Friday, Germany remains one of the least affected European countries.
Source: Zerohedge
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-08-02--TR Daily News: FCC Ignored Health Impacts of Inadequate RadioFrequency (RF) Radiation Limits

The Federal Communications Commission is supposed to protect Americans by regulating the telecom industry .
They have been doing a lousy job since long before the Trump administration .
Current FCC Chair Ajit Pai refers to this as being “ not heavy handed.
” Unfortunately , the agency ’ s “ not heavy handed ” approach has put Americans in more danger than ever especially regarding the increasingly opposed and highly controversial “ Race for 5G ” ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) .
This race includes hundreds of thousands of small cell towers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ installed in front of homes , schools , pretty much everywhere and tens of thousands of satellites blasting 5G and WiFi at us .
For real .
Lawsuits have been filed against the FCC for NOT protecting Americans from unsafe levels of radiation ( see 1 , 2 ) and 5G deployment ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) .
Last week Environmental Health Trust and Children ’ s Health Defense jointly filed a brief with their lawsuit against the FCC .
Thanks to Environmental Health Trust for republishing an article from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recently filed brief .
In 2019 , telecom executives gave congressional testimony that they have NO scientific evidence that it ’ s safe .
Congressional members have formally addressed the FCC about 5G .
Municipal governments have filed lawsuits against the FCC regarding 5G deployment .
State representatives in Hawaii introduced a bill to ban 5G until studies show that it ’ s safe .
Municipalities have passed resolutions to ban installation until studies prove it ’ s safe ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 .
5 ) and also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
American opposition to 5G is not limited to biological and environmental risks ( see 1 , 2 ) from radiation emissions .
Federal agencies have warned that it can threaten national security , public safety , and weather forecasting accuracy .
Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban , delay , halt , and limit 5G installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ) .
The majority of scientists worldwide are opposed to 5G until studies show that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology .
For more information visit our archives and the following websites .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today @

By B.N. Frank
The Federal Communications Commission is supposed to protect Americans by regulating the telecom industry. They have been doing a lousy job since long before the Trump administration. Current FCC Chair Ajit Pai refers to this as being “not heavy handed.” Unfortunately, the agency’s “not heavy handed” approach has put Americans in more danger than ever especially regarding the increasingly opposed and highly controversial “Race for 5G” (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). This race includes hundreds of thousands of small cell towers and countless other wireless infrastructure devices being installed in front of homes, schools, pretty much everywhere and tens of thousands of satellites blasting 5G and WiFi at us. For real.
Lawsuits have been filed against the FCC for NOT protecting Americans from unsafe levels of radiation (see 1, 2) and 5G deployment (see 1, 2, 3). Last week Environmental Health Trust and Children’s Health Defense jointly filed a brief with their lawsuit against the FCC.
Thanks to Environmental Health Trust for republishing an article from TR Daily news about lawsuit and the recently filed brief.
In 2019, telecom executives gave congressional testimony that they have NO scientific evidence that it’s safe. Congressional members have formally addressed the FCC about 5G. Municipal governments have filed lawsuits against the FCC regarding 5G deployment. State representatives in Hawaii introduced a bill to ban 5G until studies show that it’s safe. Municipalities have passed resolutions to ban installation until studies prove it’s safe (see 1, 2, 3, 4. 5) and also passed ordinances to limit and/or control installation.
American opposition to 5G is not limited to biological and environmental risks (see 1, 2) from radiation emissions. Federal agencies have warned that it can threaten national security, public safety, and weather forecasting accuracy. Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit 5G installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). The majority of scientists worldwide are opposed to 5G until studies show that it’s safe.
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-08-02--A Third Of US Museums “Not Confident” They Will Survive

The American Alliance of Museums ( AAM ) recently published a survey designed to gauge the state of the US museum industry during the COVID-19 pandemic .
The survey results were troubling , at least a third of directors of 760 museums reported a “ significant risk ” of closing permanently within 16 months .
The survey results document extreme financial distress in the museum field .
One-third ( 33 % ) of respondents were not confident they would be able to survive 16 months without additional financial relief , and 16 percent felt their organization was at significant risk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( 87 % ) of museums have only 12 months or less of financial operating reserves remaining , with 56 % having less than six months left to cover operations .
Forty-four percent had furloughed or laid off some portion of their staff , and 41 percent anticipated reopening with reduced staff .
– the survey said AAM President and CEO Laura Lott told NPR , “ there ’ s a large public perception that museums rely on government support when the reality is they get only a quarter of their funding from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ museums receive about 850 million visits per year .
However , this year , because of the virus pandemic and strict social distancing rules , those numbers will dramatically be reduced , resulting in the lower ticket , gift shop , and food sales .
Of the 760 museums surveyed , 40 % were history museums , historic houses , and historical societies .
Others were aquariums , botanical gardens , art museums , and science centers .
AAM said museums support “ 726,000 direct and indirect jobs and contribute $ 50 billion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adding that “ over 40 % plan to reduce staff and will need to spend additional funds to ensure their ability to reopen safely.
” To sum up , the great museum bust is dead ahead .
Does that mean cheap art is about the hit auction houses and reverse lofty prices ?
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Tyler Durden
The American Alliance of Museums (AAM) recently published a survey designed to gauge the state of the US museum industry during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey results were troubling, at least a third of directors of 760 museums reported a “significant risk” of closing permanently within 16 months.
The survey results document extreme financial distress in the museum field. One-third (33%) of respondents were not confident they would be able to survive 16 months without additional financial relief, and 16 percent felt their organization was at significant risk of permanent closure. The vast majority (87%) of museums have only 12 months or less of financial operating reserves remaining, with 56% having less than six months left to cover operations. Forty-four percent had furloughed or laid off some portion of their staff, and 41 percent anticipated reopening with reduced staff. – the survey said
AAM President and CEO Laura Lott told NPR, “there’s a large public perception that museums rely on government support when the reality is they get only a quarter of their funding from the government.”
AAM stats show US museums receive about 850 million visits per year. However, this year, because of the virus pandemic and strict social distancing rules, those numbers will dramatically be reduced, resulting in the lower ticket, gift shop, and food sales.
Of the 760 museums surveyed, 40% were history museums, historic houses, and historical societies. Others were aquariums, botanical gardens, art museums, and science centers.
AAM said museums support “726,000 direct and indirect jobs and contribute $50 billion each year to the economy,” adding that “over 40% plan to reduce staff and will need to spend additional funds to ensure their ability to reopen safely.”
To sum up, the great museum bust is dead ahead. Does that mean cheap art is about the hit auction houses and reverse lofty prices?
Source: Zerohedge
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-08-02--The Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories and the New Manhattan Project

Readers of this work now know that the post-WWII development of the New Manhattan Project appears to have been captained largely by the RAND Corporation and the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board ( SAB ) .
RAND dreams things up and the SAB evaluates and promotes RAND ’ s products .
In this ecosystem of New Manhattan Project production , a laboratory where people build lots of the necessary scientific equipment would also be required .
That laboratory was most probably the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories .
For all about the New Manhattan Project , please refer to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ edition of the author ’ s book Chemtrails Exposed : A New Manhattan Project .
The Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories ( AFCRL ) did work in just about every area of scientific study applicable to the New Manhattan Project ( NMP ) .
The AFCRL did work in : ionospheric physics , meteorology and weather modification , atmospheric electricity , low frequency electromagnetic waves , atmospheric sensing , weather radar , over-the-horizon radar , ionospheric heaters , atmospheric sounding rockets , weather satellites , advanced air traffic control systems , atmospheric tracers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
From their 1962 progress report , we learn : The evidence for the author ’ s assertion here is pervasive .
The AFCRL has been at least partially funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency as well as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration ( NASA ) : two organizations heavily implicated in the NMP .
On an ad hoc basis , the AFCRL advised : NASA , the Weather Bureau , the Defense Atomic Support Agency , the Atomic Energy Commission , Boeing , General Electric , the North Atlantic Treaty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the NMP .
The AFCRL contracted with hundreds of American universities , industrial organizations , other government agencies , private research agencies , as well as with foreign organizations .
There were scores of AFCRL field sites all over the world .
The AFCRL did work on classified projects .
All this work was done within the timeframe of NMP development proposed by the author and substantiated by a mountain of other evidence .
For these reasons , this article will now go into the history of the AFCRL , and then we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ research and development directly applicable to the New Manhattan Project .
The Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories began shortly after the war in November of 1945 as something called the Electronics Research Directorate at the Cambridge Field Station in Cambridge , Massachusetts .
These operations were a continuation of work that had previously been ongoing at the wartime Massachusetts Institute of Technology Radiation Laboratory as well as at Harvard ’ s Radio Research Laboratory .
In 1948 , other projects from the Air Force ’ s Watson Laboratories were consolidated into the operations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AFCRL was officially created and began operations in 1949 .
The laboratory locations of the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories were originally spread out at multiple locations in the Boston-Cambridge area .
All activities were under the authority of the Air Force Air Research and Development Command .
Construction of AFCRL ’ s permanent headquarters at the nearby Hanscom Field began in October of 1952 .
By March of 1962 , the AFCRL ’ s activities were consolidated at Hanscom Field .
The AFCRL was ultimately integrated into operations at Wright Patterson Air @ @ @ @ @ @ @ part of the AFCRL ’ s Operation Pea Soup , at least hundreds of pounds of carbon black was dropped from an aircraft over Arcata , California .
As part of this operation , AFCRL scientists also sprayed calcium chloride and lithium chloride from aircraft .
The AFCRL had a C-130 aircraft modified for dry ice dispersal as well as two KC-135 ’ s equipped with specialized equipment designed for atmospheric research .
In their 1975 progress report , which reads like a blueprint for the New Manhattan Project , the AFCRL details @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 25 , the authors write : CHEMICAL RELEASES FOR STRATOSPHERIC PERTURBATIONS : In February and June 1973 , the first extensive measurements of stratospheric dynamics , were completed at White Sands Missile Range , New Mexico .
The experiments consisted of producing and photographing sets of vertical and horizontal smoke trails in the stratosphere .
Each of the vertical trails , 14 to 23 km , was produced by dispensing TiCl4 from Nike rocket payloads .
The horizontal trails were made by fuel dumps and TiCl4 from a WB-57F flown by the 258th @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as dye markers for both the motion of the winds and the turbulent mixing .
By continually photographing the trails for some ten minutes , a time history is obtained from which wind shears are measured .
Telescopic photographs of the trails clearly show the increase of trail diameter and the action of turbulence in dispersing the smoke .
This information along with the measurement of ozone densities obtained simultaneously provide a necessary bench mark for evaluating dynamic models of the stratosphere .
The models will be used to predict the behavior of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the stratosphere .
These and other weapons-produced perturbations can also have an effect in the stratosphere , such as the possible reduction of the ozone layer .
These possible effects can result in a higher incidence of cancer , and loss of food crop production in farms and oceans .
A computer model of stratospheric transport has been developed which , in conjunction with published wind profiles , predicts a half residence time of three years for emissions deposited 10 km above the tropopause .
As readers of this work already know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New Mexico ( where these experiments took place ) was where former Nazi scientists worked on modifications of the German V-2 rocket .
AFCRL personnel participated in these V-2 launchings and AFCRL personnel continued to work at White Sands for decades .
Ernst Czerlinsky , a former member of the Nazi SS , worked at the AFCRL .
Scientists rescued from the Nazi regime as part of Operation Paperclip are heavily implicated in the production of the NMP .
The AFCRL and the SAGE system The AFCRL played a central role in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SAGE ) system .
The SAGE system used radar and a centralized supercomputer to direct the movements of unmanned aircraft .
Throughout the decades , this SAGE system and its offspring have served as the nucleus of New Manhattan Project development .
Almost from the very beginning , the AFCRL supported the SAGE system .
The SAGE system started originally with something called the Valley Committee .
In 1950 this Valley Committee was granted organizational status by its assignation to a division of the AFCRL .
With the involvement of the Massachusetts Institute @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into Project Charles , then into Project Lincoln , then into Project Whirlwind , then into the SAGE system .
The AFCRL provided support throughout this evolution and shared their headquarters with Project Lincoln at Hanscom AFB .
Development of the SAGE system was eventually transferred to the MITRE Corporation .
Readers of this work recognize the MITRE Corporation as the most probable administrator of all of the scientific aspects of today ’ s New Manhattan Project .
As readers of this work already know , ionospheric heaters play a central role in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The predecessors of today ’ s ionospheric heaters were known as over-the-horizon radar – or ‘ OTH ’ radar .
Consistently , the AFCRL worked in the field of OTH radar and the AFCRL was fundamental to the establishment of an early , powerful ionospheric heater at Arecibo , Puerto Rico .
Beginning in the early 1960s , the AFCRL ’ s Project CAME BRIDGE was about OTH radar development and it involved extensive networks of field sites both in the United States and overseas .
One of these sites was operated by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ operated under contract .
AFCRL ’ s OTH radar work continued on into the early 1980s .
Also in the early 1960s , construction began on the Arecibo ionospheric heater in Puerto Rico .
The project was funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency ( ARPA ) and was supervised by the AFCRL .
AFCRL research previously conducted in the 1950s was fundamental to its capabilities .
Arecibo began operating in early 1964 and the AFCRL continued to support operations at Arecibo for decades .
Many people refer to today ’ s chemtrail @ @ @ @ @ @ @ They claim that this is the official name of the New Manhattan Project .
If one searches online for the term ‘ Project Cloverleaf , ’ one will find quite a bit of material , but very little credible documentation substantiating the assertion that Project Cloverleaf is the official name of this project .
Your author has apparently uncovered the most credible evidence yet .
On page 59 of the 1962 AFCRL progress report , the authors write of a proposed , revolutionary new type of radar to be constructed in the shape @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the writing of this report , construction of a model of the new radar had begun at a Harvard University field site at Strawberry Hill in Concord , Mass .
The model , which was the only one of its type in the United States , was scheduled to be completed in the summer of 1962 .
Is this part of the fabled Project Cloverleaf which is supposed to be another name for today ’ s ongoing spraying operations ?
When I first uncovered this information early this year , I scanned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sent them to my science advisor Ginny Silcox .
Ginny replied : In a recent email , Ginny followed up , Having a good science advisor really comes in handy .
I ran one of the AFCRL ’ s later semi-annual reports past Ginny , asking her to evaluate whether or not the AFCRL appears to have been the main laboratory for New Manhattan Project development .
She responded by writing that , based on this report , it looks like the AFCRL handled all types of lab work applicable to the NMP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of all this toward weather modification .
I immediately responded , speculating that the laboratory that most probably handled the actual weather modification work was New Mexico Tech ’ s Langmuir Laboratory .
She responded , “ Langmuir Lab seems possible , and we should be able to find at least some documentation if that ’ s the case.
” To be continued… “ Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories Report on Research for the period July 1972 to June 1974 ” a report by the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories , published by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1975 “ Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories : History and Progress 1961-1962 ” a report by Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories , published by the U.S. Department of Commerce , Office of Technical Services , October 1962 “ CHRONOLOGY : From the Cambridge Field Station to the Air Force Geophysics Laboratory 1945-1985 ” a report by the Air Force Geophysics Laboratory , September 6 , 1985 “ Geophysics Research Directorate Annual Report 1960 ” a report by the Geophysics Research Directorate of the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories , 1960 PeterAKirby.com My Minds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ My YouTube channel My BitChute channel Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael , CA researcher , author , and activist .
Please buy the greatly revised and expanded second edition of his book Chemtrails Exposed : A New Manhattan Project available now exclusively at Amazon .
Also please join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Peter A. Kirby
Readers of this work now know that the post-WWII development of the New Manhattan Project appears to have been captained largely by the RAND Corporation and the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board (SAB). RAND dreams things up and the SAB evaluates and promotes RAND’s products. In this ecosystem of New Manhattan Project production, a laboratory where people build lots of the necessary scientific equipment would also be required. That laboratory was most probably the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories. For all about the New Manhattan Project, please refer to the new, greatly revised and expanded second edition of the author’s book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project.
The Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories (AFCRL) did work in just about every area of scientific study applicable to the New Manhattan Project (NMP). The AFCRL did work in: ionospheric physics, meteorology and weather modification, atmospheric electricity, low frequency electromagnetic waves, atmospheric sensing, weather radar, over-the-horizon radar, ionospheric heaters, atmospheric sounding rockets, weather satellites, advanced air traffic control systems, atmospheric tracers, brain wave research, and more. From their 1962 progress report, we learn:
For many years the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories have conducted wide-ranging meteorological investigations affecting almost every phase of Air Force operations. AFCRL’s mission in this area, in cooperation with other military and civilian agencies, is the accumulation of new knowledge of the entire gaseous envelope of the Earth – its variations in pressure, temperature, composition, and circulation. One of its ultimate goals is a detailed understanding of the factors that affect the weather, which may lead to a capability to accurately predict it, and perhaps to control it on a limited scale.
The evidence for the author’s assertion here is pervasive. The AFCRL has been at least partially funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency as well as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): two organizations heavily implicated in the NMP. On an ad hoc basis, the AFCRL advised: NASA, the Weather Bureau, the Defense Atomic Support Agency, the Atomic Energy Commission, Boeing, General Electric, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and other organizations associated with the NMP. The AFCRL contracted with hundreds of American universities, industrial organizations, other government agencies, private research agencies, as well as with foreign organizations. There were scores of AFCRL field sites all over the world. The AFCRL did work on classified projects. All this work was done within the timeframe of NMP development proposed by the author and substantiated by a mountain of other evidence. For these reasons, this article will now go into the history of the AFCRL, and then we will detail certain specific areas of their research and development directly applicable to the New Manhattan Project.
History of the AFCRL
The Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories began shortly after the war in November of 1945 as something called the Electronics Research Directorate at the Cambridge Field Station in Cambridge, Massachusetts. These operations were a continuation of work that had previously been ongoing at the wartime Massachusetts Institute of Technology Radiation Laboratory as well as at Harvard’s Radio Research Laboratory. In 1948, other projects from the Air Force’s Watson Laboratories were consolidated into the operations at the Electronics Research Directorate. The AFCRL was officially created and began operations in 1949.
The laboratory locations of the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories were originally spread out at multiple locations in the Boston-Cambridge area. All activities were under the authority of the Air Force Air Research and Development Command. Construction of AFCRL’s permanent headquarters at the nearby Hanscom Field began in October of 1952. By March of 1962, the AFCRL’s activities were consolidated at Hanscom Field. The AFCRL was ultimately integrated into operations at Wright Patterson Air Force Base.
The AFCRL and chemtrails
In 1961, as part of the AFCRL’s Operation Pea Soup, at least hundreds of pounds of carbon black was dropped from an aircraft over Arcata, California. As part of this operation, AFCRL scientists also sprayed calcium chloride and lithium chloride from aircraft. The AFCRL had a C-130 aircraft modified for dry ice dispersal as well as two KC-135’s equipped with specialized equipment designed for atmospheric research.
In their 1975 progress report, which reads like a blueprint for the New Manhattan Project, the AFCRL details a chemtrail spraying program. On page 25, the authors write:
CHEMICAL RELEASES FOR STRATOSPHERIC PERTURBATIONS: In February and June 1973, the first extensive measurements of stratospheric dynamics, were completed at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. The experiments consisted of producing and photographing sets of vertical and horizontal smoke trails in the stratosphere. Each of the vertical trails, 14 to 23 km, was produced by dispensing TiCl4 from Nike rocket payloads. The horizontal trails were made by fuel dumps and TiCl4 from a WB-57F flown by the 258th Weather Reconnaissance Squadron. These trails served as dye markers for both the motion of the winds and the turbulent mixing. By continually photographing the trails for some ten minutes, a time history is obtained from which wind shears are measured. Telescopic photographs of the trails clearly show the increase of trail diameter and the action of turbulence in dispersing the smoke. This information along with the measurement of ozone densities obtained simultaneously provide a necessary bench mark for evaluating dynamic models of the stratosphere. The models will be used to predict the behavior of emission products, supersonic bombers and missiles in the stratosphere. These and other weapons-produced perturbations can also have an effect in the stratosphere, such as the possible reduction of the ozone layer. These possible effects can result in a higher incidence of cancer, and loss of food crop production in farms and oceans. A computer model of stratospheric transport has been developed which, in conjunction with published wind profiles, predicts a half residence time of three years for emissions deposited 10 km above the tropopause.
As readers of this work already know, the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico (where these experiments took place) was where former Nazi scientists worked on modifications of the German V-2 rocket. AFCRL personnel participated in these V-2 launchings and AFCRL personnel continued to work at White Sands for decades. Ernst Czerlinsky, a former member of the Nazi SS, worked at the AFCRL. Scientists rescued from the Nazi regime as part of Operation Paperclip are heavily implicated in the production of the NMP.
The AFCRL and the SAGE system
The AFCRL played a central role in the development of the Semi-Automatic Ground Environment (SAGE) system. The SAGE system used radar and a centralized supercomputer to direct the movements of unmanned aircraft. Throughout the decades, this SAGE system and its offspring have served as the nucleus of New Manhattan Project development.
Almost from the very beginning, the AFCRL supported the SAGE system. The SAGE system started originally with something called the Valley Committee. In 1950 this Valley Committee was granted organizational status by its assignation to a division of the AFCRL. With the involvement of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the Valley Committee evolved into Project Charles, then into Project Lincoln, then into Project Whirlwind, then into the SAGE system. The AFCRL provided support throughout this evolution and shared their headquarters with Project Lincoln at Hanscom AFB. Development of the SAGE system was eventually transferred to the MITRE Corporation. Readers of this work recognize the MITRE Corporation as the most probable administrator of all of the scientific aspects of today’s New Manhattan Project.
OTH radar and ionospheric heaters
As readers of this work already know, ionospheric heaters play a central role in today’s New Manhattan Project. The predecessors of today’s ionospheric heaters were known as over-the-horizon radar – or ‘OTH’ radar. Consistently, the AFCRL worked in the field of OTH radar and the AFCRL was fundamental to the establishment of an early, powerful ionospheric heater at Arecibo, Puerto Rico.
Beginning in the early 1960s, the AFCRL’s Project CAME BRIDGE was about OTH radar development and it involved extensive networks of field sites both in the United States and overseas. One of these sites was operated by AFCRL personnel, while the others were operated under contract. AFCRL’s OTH radar work continued on into the early 1980s.
Also in the early 1960s, construction began on the Arecibo ionospheric heater in Puerto Rico. The project was funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) and was supervised by the AFCRL. AFCRL research previously conducted in the 1950s was fundamental to its capabilities. Arecibo began operating in early 1964 and the AFCRL continued to support operations at Arecibo for decades.
Project Cloverleaf
Many people refer to today’s chemtrail spraying operations as ‘Project Cloverleaf.’ They claim that this is the official name of the New Manhattan Project. If one searches online for the term ‘Project Cloverleaf,’ one will find quite a bit of material, but very little credible documentation substantiating the assertion that Project Cloverleaf is the official name of this project. Your author has apparently uncovered the most credible evidence yet.
On page 59 of the 1962 AFCRL progress report, the authors write of a proposed, revolutionary new type of radar to be constructed in the shape of a cloverleaf. At the time of the writing of this report, construction of a model of the new radar had begun at a Harvard University field site at Strawberry Hill in Concord, Mass. The model, which was the only one of its type in the United States, was scheduled to be completed in the summer of 1962. Is this part of the fabled Project Cloverleaf which is supposed to be another name for today’s ongoing spraying operations?
When I first uncovered this information early this year, I scanned the appropriate pages from the report and sent them to my science advisor Ginny Silcox. Ginny replied:
That’s interesting… I’ve only heard of cloverleaf in reference to the aerosols, but you might be onto something here. Since the cloverleaf style of antenna is like a compound dipole, it seems that a cloud of metallic aerosols could either extend the range, or react in an unknown scary way to radiation coming from it. Here’s a good tutorial on cloverleaf antennas… but the ones I’ve seen are always 3 dimensional, so that flat cloverleaf design doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. Note that the 3D model has radiation dispersion in the shape of a toroid… pretty interesting.
In a recent email, Ginny followed up,
Peter, since I made that comment, I’ve come to realize that the cloverleaf antennas are capable of producing longitudinal (compressional) waveforms. That’s the kind of energy that can mobilize or retard cloud movement. It’s also a first step to a type of DEW [Directed Energy Weapon].
In conclusion
Having a good science advisor really comes in handy. I ran one of the AFCRL’s later semi-annual reports past Ginny, asking her to evaluate whether or not the AFCRL appears to have been the main laboratory for New Manhattan Project development. She responded by writing that, based on this report, it looks like the AFCRL handled all types of lab work applicable to the NMP with the exception of the actual implementation of all this toward weather modification. I immediately responded, speculating that the laboratory that most probably handled the actual weather modification work was New Mexico Tech’s Langmuir Laboratory. She responded, “Langmuir Lab seems possible, and we should be able to find at least some documentation if that’s the case.” To be continued…
References
“Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories Report on Research for the period July 1972 to June 1974” a report by the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, published by the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, 1975
“Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories: History and Progress 1961-1962” a report by Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, published by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Technical Services, October 1962
“CHRONOLOGY: From the Cambridge Field Station to the Air Force Geophysics Laboratory 1945-1985” a report by the Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, September 6, 1985
“Geophysics Research Directorate Annual Report 1960” a report by the Geophysics Research Directorate of the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, 1960
Links
PeterAKirby.com
My Minds page
My Parler page
My GoodReads page
My YouTube channel
My BitChute channel
Websites
ClimateViewer.com
NoGeoingegneria.com
StopSprayingCalifornia.com
ChemSky.org
NuclearPlanet.com
GlobalSkyWatch.com
ChemtrailsProject.com
ChemtrailsProjectUK.com
ChemtrailSafety.com
GeoengineeringWatch.org
Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. Please buy the greatly revised and expanded second edition of his book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project available now exclusively at Amazon. Also please join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-08-04--FDA Now Says Avoid 101 Hand Sanitizer Products — Some Still Not Recalled (List included)

Last week the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) warned about 87 toxic and potentially deadly hand sanitizers – some of which had been recalled .
Now they are warning about more .
The FDA ’ s list of dangerous hand sanitizers has now grown to more than 100 To see the list , click here to visit the FDA ’ s website and scroll down .
( CNN ) The US Food and Drug Administration has expanded its warning about hand sanitizers to avoid , with the list now topping 100 .
The agency first warned consumers in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which can be toxic when absorbed through the skin and potentially deadly if ingested .
Since then , several such products have been recalled by manufacturers and pulled from store shelves .
Now , the FDA is also warning about hand sanitizers containing insufficient levels of alcohol .
“ FDA test results show certain hand sanitizers have concerningly low levels of ethyl alcohol or isopropyl alcohol , which are active ingredients in hand sanitizer products , ” the agency said in its updated warning on July 31 .
“ The agency urges consumers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has expanded its list to include subpotent hand sanitizers , in addition to hand sanitizers that are or may be contaminated with methanol.
” Nearly all of the hand sanitizers on the FDA ’ s list were manufactured in Mexico .
The agency has recommended recalls for most of the products , and has also issued import alerts to halt them from entering the country .
Proper hand hygiene is an important part of the response to Covid-19 , according to the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention .
The CDC recommends that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least 60 % alcohol if soap and water are not readily available .
The full list of hand sanitizers to avoid Below are all of the hand sanitizers that the FDA is warning consumers to avoid : • Clear Advanced Hand Sanitizer with 70 % Alcohol extra soft with glycerin and aloe The FDA is supposed to protect Americans from harmful products before they are made available to the public .
Unfortunately , they have an embarrassingly long track record of not doing so .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
Last week the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned about 87 toxic and potentially deadly hand sanitizers – some of which had been recalled. Now they are warning about more.
From CNN:
The FDA’s list of dangerous hand sanitizers has now grown to more than 100
To see the list, click here to visit the FDA’s website and scroll down.
(CNN)The US Food and Drug Administration has expanded its warning about hand sanitizers to avoid, with the list now topping 100.
The agency first warned consumers in June about hand sanitizers containing methanol, which can be toxic when absorbed through the skin and potentially deadly if ingested. Since then, several such products have been recalled by manufacturers and pulled from store shelves.
Now, the FDA is also warning about hand sanitizers containing insufficient levels of alcohol.
“FDA test results show certain hand sanitizers have concerningly low levels of ethyl alcohol or isopropyl alcohol, which are active ingredients in hand sanitizer products,” the agency said in its updated warning on July 31.
“The agency urges consumers not to use these subpotent products and has expanded its list to include subpotent hand sanitizers, in addition to hand sanitizers that are or may be contaminated with methanol.”
Nearly all of the hand sanitizers on the FDA’s list were manufactured in Mexico. The agency has recommended recalls for most of the products, and has also issued import alerts to halt them from entering the country.
Proper hand hygiene is an important part of the response to Covid-19, according to the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC recommends that people use alcohol-based hand sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol if soap and water are not readily available.
The full list of hand sanitizers to avoid
Below are all of the hand sanitizers that the FDA is warning consumers to avoid:
Blumen Clear Advanced Hand Sanitizer with 70% Alcohol
Blumen Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Clear Ethyl Alcohol 70%
BLUMEN Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Clear
BLUMEN Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Clear
KLAR AND DANVER Instant Hand Sanitizer
MODESA Instant Hand Sanitizer Moisturizers and Vitamin E
BLUMEN Advanced Hand Sanitizer
BLUMEN Advanced Hand Sanitizer
BLUMEN Advanced Hand Sanitizer Aloe
BLUMEN Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Lavender
BLUMEN Clear Advanced Hand Sanitizer
BLUMEN Clear Advanced Hand Sanitizer
BLUMEN Clear LEAR Advanced Hand Sanitizer
BLUMEN Clear LEAR Advanced Hand Sanitizer
The Honeykeeper Hand Sanitizer
BLUMEN Advanced Hand Sanitizer Clear
BLUMEN Clear Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer
BLUMEN Clear Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Aloe
BLUMEN Clear Advanced Instant Hand Sanitizer Lavender
BLUMEN Aloe Advanced Hand Sanitizer, with 70 Alcohol
BLUMEN Aloe Advanced Hand Sanitizer, with 70 Alcohol
Blumen Advanced Hand Sanitizer Lavender, with 70% alcohol
Blumen Advanced Hand Sanitizer Aloe, with 70% alcohol
Blumen Antibacterial Fresh Citrus Hand Sanitizer
Blumen Hand Sanitizer Fresh Citrus
KLAR and DANVER Instant Hand Sanitizer
Hello Kitty Hand Sanitizer
Assured Instant Hand Sanitizer (Vitamin E and Aloe)
Assured Instant Hand Sanitizer (Aloe and Moisturizers)
Assured Instant Hand Sanitizer Vitamin E and Aloe
Assured Instant Hand Sanitizer Aloe and Moisturizers
BLUMEN Instant Hand Sanitizer Fragrance Free
BLUMEN Instant Hand Sanitizer Aloe Vera
Assured Aloe
bio aaa Advance Hand Sanitizer
LumiSkin Advance Hand Sanitizer 4 oz
LumiSkin Advance Hand Sanitizer 16 oz
QualitaMed Hand Sanitizer
NEXT Hand Sanitizer
Clear Advanced Hand Sanitizer with 70% Alcohol extra soft with glycerin and aloe
NuuxSan Instant Antibacterial Hand Sanitizer
NuuxSan Instant Hand Sanitizer
Assured Instant Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer with Aloe and Moisturizers
Assured Instant Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer with Vitamin E and Aloe
Modesa Instant Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer with Moisturizers and Aloe Vera
Modesa Instant Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer with Moisturizers and Vitamin E
Herbacil Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer 70% Alcohol
Herbacil Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer 70% Alcohol
Herbacil Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer 70% Alcohol
Earths Amenities Instant Unscented Hand Sanitizer with Aloe Vera Advanced
Hand Sanitizer Agavespa Skincare
Vidanos Easy Cleaning Rentals Hand Sanitizer Agavespa Skincare
All-Clean Hand Sanitizer
Esk Biochem Hand Sanitizer
Lavar 70 Gel Hand Sanitizer
The Good Gel Antibacterial Gel Hand Sanitizer
CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 80% Alcohol
CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 75% Alcohol
CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 80% Alcohol
Saniderm Advanced Hand Sanitizer
Hand sanitizer Gel Unscented 70% Alcohol
Medicare Alcohol Antiseptic Topical Solution
GelBact Hand Sanitizer
Hand Sanitizer
TriCleanz
Sayab Antisepctic Hand Sanitizer 100
Jaloma Antiseptic Hand Sanitizer Ethyl Alcohol 62% with Vitamin E
Leiper’s Fork Distillery Bulk Disinfectant per 5 gallon and Leiper’s Fork Distillery 16 oz bottle
Andy’s Best
Andy’s
NeoNatural
Plus Advanced
Optimus Instant Hand Sanitizer
Optimus Lubricants Instant Hand Sanitizer
Optimus Instant Hand Sanitizer
Selecto Hand Sanitizer
Shine and Clean Hand Sanitizer
Hand Sanitizer Disinfectant Gel 70% Ethyl Alcohol
Hand Sanitizer Disinfectant Gel 70% Ethyl Alcohol Rinse Free Hand Rub
Mystic Shield Protection hand sanitizer
Born Basic. Anti-Bac Hand Sanitizer 70% alcohol
Born Basic. Anti-Bac Hand Sanitizer 65% Alcohol
Scent Theory — Keep It Clean — Pure Clean Anti-bacterial Hand Sanitizer
Cavalry
ENLIVEN Hand Sanitizing Gel
Lux Eoi Hand Sanitizing Gel
Scent Theory — Keep It Clean — Pure Clean Anti-bacterial Hand Sanitizer
Bersih Hand Sanitizer Gel Fragrance Free
Bersih Antiseptic Alcohol 70% Topical Solution hand sanitizer
Purity Advanced Hand Sanitizer
Hand Sanitizer Gel Alcohol 70%
TriCleanz Tritanium Labs Hand Sanitizer
Britz Hand Sanitizer Ethyl Alcohol 70%
Parabola Hand Sanitizer
Urbane Bath and Body Hand Sanitizer
Cleaner Hand Sanitizer Rinse Free 70%
Handzer Hand Sanitizer Rinse Free
Kleanz Antibacterial Hand Sanitizer Advanced
Be Safe Hand Sanitizer
Wave Hand Sanitizer Gel
DAESI Hand Sanitizer
The FDA is supposed to protect Americans from harmful products before they are made available to the public. Unfortunately, they have an embarrassingly long track record of not doing so.
Image: Pixabay
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-08-03--Airport Robbery: Feds Take Over $2 Billion From Travelers Through Asset Forfeiture

For the first time ever , data from the Treasury Department ’ s forfeiture database has been put through a detailed study regarding airport seizures , thanks for a multi-year legal battle by the Institute for Justice .
Covering 2000 through 2016 , the study quantifies just how often DHS agencies have seized currency at airports—and just how much currency has flowed into the federal government ’ s coffers as a result .
• New report : CBP , Other DHS Agencies Seized $ 500 Million From Air Travelers Over Missing Paperwork • Homeland Security Seized $ 2 Billion in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • Asset Forfeiture is Theft : An Overview of the State and Federal Programs Become a Member : http : //tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/ Email Newsletter : http : //tenthamendmentcenter.com/register RSS : http : //feeds.feedburner.com/tacdailydigest Brave : Use Brave Browser for Privacy and Help Support TAC Michael Boldin [ send him email ] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center .
He was raised in Milwaukee , WI , and currently resides in Los Angeles , CA .
Follow him on twitter – @ michaelboldin and Facebook .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Michael Boldin
For the first time ever, data from the Treasury Department’s forfeiture database has been put through a detailed study regarding airport seizures, thanks for a multi-year legal battle by the Institute for Justice.
Covering 2000 through 2016, the study quantifies just how often DHS agencies have seized currency at airports—and just how much currency has flowed into the federal government’s coffers as a result.
SHOW LINKS:
ALTERNATE VIDEO SOURCES
FOLLOW and SUPPORT TAC:
Become a Member: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/
Email Newsletter: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/register
RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/tacdailydigest
Brave: Use Brave Browser for Privacy and Help Support TAC
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/TenthAmendmentCenter
Twitter: http://twitter.com/tenthamendment
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tenthamendmentcenter/
Periscope: https://www.periscope.tv/TenthAmendment/
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/tenthamendmentcenter
DLive: https://dlive.tv/TenthAmendmentCenter
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tenthamendmentcenter
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/X0AJnBhWbCkx/
Minds: https://www.minds.com/TenthAmendmentCenter
LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@TenthAmendmentCenter
Source: Tenth Amendment Center
Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter – @michaelboldin and Facebook.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-08-03--Law360:  Two Non-Profits Say FCC is Ignoring Evidence of Cell Phone and Wireless Exposure Harm

The Federal Communications Commission is supposed to protect Americans by regulating the telecom industry .
They have been doing the exact opposite for decades .
Current FCC Chair Ajit Pai refers to this as being “ not heavy handed.
” Unfortunately , the agency ’ s “ not heavy handed ” methodology has put Americans in more danger than ever with widespread deployment of 5G on land and in space ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ) which also includes the densification of additional harmful 3G and 4G infrastructure .
Lawsuits have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Americans from unsafe levels of radiation ( see 1 , 2 ) and 5G deployment ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) .
Last week Environmental Health Trust and Children ’ s Health Defense jointly filed a brief with their lawsuits against the FCC .
The filing of this brief was reported by TR Daily News and also Law360 .
The case is Environmental Health Trust , et al .
v. FCC , et al.
, case number 20-1025 , in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 5:34 PM EDT ) — The Federal Communications Commission failed to address scientists ’ and individuals ’ health concerns when it concluded its current wireless safety guidelines are still sufficient for the 5G era , two nonprofits told the D.C .
Circuit on Wednesday .
In an opening brief , the Children ’ s Health Defense and the Environmental Health Trust argued the agency glossed over crucial evidence when it found in December that its radiofrequency-exposure limits — established in 1996 — still provide adequate protection .
“ The FCC received an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ studies , analyses , and reports demonstrating a consensus of the scientific community that radiofrequency radiation is harmful and sometimes lethal to individuals and the environment , ” the brief says .
“ The factual record in this case is strong .
Yet the Order gives no consideration to most of the evidence presented to it.
” The case , filed in late January , argues that the FCC ’ s rules don ’ t go far enough to protect consumers , especially when those exposed to long-term or multiple sources of radiation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provide for sensitive or vulnerable populations , ” according to the brief .
Last year , the FCC revisited its wireless safety standards and found that the current regulations are among the strictest worldwide , making them still effective in protecting people from harmful wireless transmissions .
But according to the lawsuit , the rules don ’ t control for conditions like radiation sickness , which the suit says causes symptoms such as memory loss and fatigue when individuals are exposed to a high volume of invisible radio waves .
Prolonged exposure can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ associated with negative environmental impacts , the suit claims .
Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
American opposition to 5G is not limited to biological and environmental risks ( see 1 , 2 ) from radiation .
Federal agencies have warned that it can threaten national security , public safety , and weather forecasting accuracy .
In 2019 , telecom executives gave congressional testimony that they have NO scientific evidence that it ’ s safe .
Congressional members have formally addressed the FCC about 5G .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ FCC because of 5G .
State representatives in Hawaii introduced a bill to ban 5G until studies show that it ’ s safe .
Municipalities have passed resolutions to ban it until studies prove it ’ s safe ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 .
5 ) and have passed ordinances to limit and/or control installation .
Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban , delay , halt , and limit 5G installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of scientists worldwide are opposed to deployment until studies show that it ’ s safe .
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology .
For more information visit our archives and the following websites .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free @ @ @ @ @ @

By B.N. Frank
The Federal Communications Commission is supposed to protect Americans by regulating the telecom industry. They have been doing the exact opposite for decades. Current FCC Chair Ajit Pai refers to this as being “not heavy handed.” Unfortunately, the agency’s “not heavy handed” methodology has put Americans in more danger than ever with widespread deployment of 5G on land and in space (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) which also includes the densification of additional harmful 3G and 4G infrastructure.
Lawsuits have been filed against the FCC for NOT protecting Americans from unsafe levels of radiation (see 1, 2) and 5G deployment (see 1, 2, 3). Last week Environmental Health Trust and Children’s Health Defense jointly filed a brief with their lawsuits against the FCC. The filing of this brief was reported by TR Daily News and also Law360.
From Environmental Health Trust:
FCC Ignoring Evidence Of Wireless Tech Harms, DC Circ. Told
The case is Environmental Health Trust, et al. v. FCC, et al., case number 20-1025, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Kelcee Griffis, Law360, Jul 30, 2020
Law360 (July 30, 2020, 5:34 PM EDT) — The Federal Communications Commission failed to address scientists’ and individuals’ health concerns when it concluded its current wireless safety guidelines are still sufficient for the 5G era, two nonprofits told the D.C. Circuit on Wednesday.
In an opening brief, the Children’s Health Defense and the Environmental Health Trust argued the agency glossed over crucial evidence when it found in December that its radiofrequency-exposure limits — established in 1996 — still provide adequate protection.
“The FCC received an enormous number of peer-reviewed scientific and medical studies, analyses, and reports demonstrating a consensus of the scientific community that radiofrequency radiation is harmful and sometimes lethal to individuals and the environment,” the brief says. “The factual record in this case is strong. Yet the Order gives no consideration to most of the evidence presented to it.”
The case, filed in late January, argues that the FCC’s rules don’t go far enough to protect consumers, especially when those exposed to long-term or multiple sources of radiation. The rules also “do not provide for sensitive or vulnerable populations,” according to the brief.
Last year, the FCC revisited its wireless safety standards and found that the current regulations are among the strictest worldwide, making them still effective in protecting people from harmful wireless transmissions.
But according to the lawsuit, the rules don’t control for conditions like radiation sickness, which the suit says causes symptoms such as memory loss and fatigue when individuals are exposed to a high volume of invisible radio waves. Prolonged exposure can also impair development in children and is associated with negative environmental impacts, the suit claims.
Read the full article at https://www.law360.com/articles/1296924/fcc-ignoring-evidence-of-wireless-tech-harms-dc-circ-told
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
American opposition to 5G is not limited to biological and environmental risks (see 1, 2) from radiation. Federal agencies have warned that it can threaten national security, public safety, and weather forecasting accuracy.
In 2019, telecom executives gave congressional testimony that they have NO scientific evidence that it’s safe. Congressional members have formally addressed the FCC about 5G. Municipal governments have filed lawsuits against the FCC because of 5G. State representatives in Hawaii introduced a bill to ban 5G until studies show that it’s safe. Municipalities have passed resolutions to ban it until studies prove it’s safe (see 1, 2, 3, 4. 5) and have passed ordinances to limit and/or control installation.
Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit 5G installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). The majority of scientists worldwide are opposed to deployment until studies show that it’s safe.
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-08-03--Ten Years After Lieberman’s “Internet Kill Switch,” the War on Freedom Still Rages

In 2010 , US Senators Joe Lieberman ( D-CT ) , Susan Collins ( R-ME ) , and Thomas Carper ( D-DE ) introduced their Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act .
Better known as the “ Internet Kill Switch ” proposal for the emergency powers it would have conferred on the president , the bill died without receiving a vote in either house of Congress .
A decade later , the same fake issues and the same authoritarian “ solutions ” continue to dominate discussions on the relationship between technology and state .
The real issue remains the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a column on the “ Kill Switch ” bill nearly 10 years ago : A single thread connects the “ Internet Kill Switch ” to the passage of Internet censorship provisions in the name of fighting sex trafficking ( FOSTA/SESTA ) , the whining of federal law enforcement and intelligence officials for “ back doors ” to cripple strong encryption , and President Trump ’ s threats to ban video-sharing app TikTok , supposedly because the Chinese government ’ s surveillance programs just might be as lawless and intrusive as those of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the burning , pathological compulsion which drives politicians and bureaucrats to control every aspect of our lives , on the flimsiest of excuses and no matter the cost to us .
The compulsion hardly limits itself to technology issues ( the war on drugs in a great example of its scope ) , nor is it limited to the federal level of government ( see , for example , the mostly state and local diktats placing millions of Americans under house arrest without charge or trial “ because COVID-19 ” ) .
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vis-à-vis the Internet than “ public health ” -based authoritarianism because we ’ ve been propagandized and indoctrinated into the latter ideology for centuries , while the public-facing Internet is younger than most Americans .
Few of us can remember the days before quarantine-empowered “ health departments ” in every county , let alone a time when a five-year-old could walk into a store and buy morphine without so much as a doctor ’ s note .
But most of us can remember a relatively censorship-free Internet and the false promises of politicians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power it gave to free speech .
That makes “ kill switches ” and “ back doors ” and TikTok bans a tougher sell .
But the political class is still coming after the Internet .
If we want to continue living in the 21st century instead of the 11th , we ’ re going to have to keep fighting them .
Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism .
He lives and works in north central Florida .
This article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Thomas Knapp
In 2010, US Senators Joe Lieberman (D-CT), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Thomas Carper (D-DE) introduced their Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act. Better known as the “Internet Kill Switch” proposal for the emergency powers it would have conferred on the president, the bill died without receiving a vote in either house of Congress.
A decade later, the same fake issues and the same authoritarian “solutions” continue to dominate discussions on the relationship between technology and state. The real issue remains the same as well. As I wrote in a column on the “Kill Switch” bill nearly 10 years ago:
If the price of keeping Joe Lieberman in power is you staring over a plow at the ass end of a mule all day and lighting your home with candles or kerosene at night before collapsing on a bed of filthy straw, that’s a price Joe Lieberman is more than willing to have you pay.
A single thread connects the “Internet Kill Switch” to the passage of Internet censorship provisions in the name of fighting sex trafficking (FOSTA/SESTA), the whining of federal law enforcement and intelligence officials for “back doors” to cripple strong encryption, and President Trump’s threats to ban video-sharing app TikTok, supposedly because the Chinese government’s surveillance programs just might be as lawless and intrusive as those of the US government.
That thread is the burning, pathological compulsion which drives politicians and bureaucrats to control every aspect of our lives, on the flimsiest of excuses and no matter the cost to us.
The compulsion hardly limits itself to technology issues (the war on drugs in a great example of its scope), nor is it limited to the federal level of government (see, for example, the mostly state and local diktats placing millions of Americans under house arrest without charge or trial “because COVID-19”).
That thread and that compulsion are more obvious vis-à-vis the Internet than “public health”-based authoritarianism because we’ve been propagandized and indoctrinated into the latter ideology for centuries, while the public-facing Internet is younger than most Americans.
Few of us can remember the days before quarantine-empowered “health departments” in every county, let alone a time when a five-year-old could walk into a store and buy morphine without so much as a doctor’s note.
But most of us can remember a relatively censorship-free Internet and the false promises of politicians and bureaucrats to respect the dramatically expanded power it gave to free speech.
That makes “kill switches” and “back doors” and TikTok bans a tougher sell. But the political class is still coming after the Internet. If we want to continue living in the 21st century instead of the 11th, we’re going to have to keep fighting them.
Source: Antiwar
Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism. He lives and works in north central Florida. This article is reprinted with permission from William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-08-03--Mysterious Drone Swarm Breached Secure Airspace Over Largest Nuclear Power Plant In US

A mysterious incident related to a serious breach of secure airspace over America ’ s largest nuclear power plant has been unearthed through Freedom of Information Act documents gained from the government .
It ’ s leading to new fears that America ’ s energy infrastructure is prone to attack and potentially being knocked offline , akin to the drone and missile attack which temporarily halted all Saudi oil exports last year at Aramco ’ s Abaqaiq oil processing facility .
Forbes presents the astonishing details as follows : The newly accessed Nuclear Regulatory Commission ( NRC ) documents had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as it involved swarms of inexpensive , likely off-the-shelf drones flying in large numbers over restricted airspace and near sensitive structures of Arizona ’ s Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant .
The documents conclude that it ’ s still as yet unknown who or what entity sent them or who was operating them during the illegal incursion .
“ Documents gained under the Freedom of Information Act show how a number of small drones flew around a restricted area at Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant on two successive nights last September , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ watched , but were apparently helpless to act as the drones carried out their incursions before disappearing into the night .
Details of the event gives some clues as to just what they were doing , but who sent them remains a mystery.
” The FOIA documents underscore the incident was confusing and chaotic for security on the ground , as the security logs suggest : Officer noticed several drones ( 5 or 6 ) flying over the site .
The drones are circling the 3 unit site inside and outside the Protected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and white rights and are estimated to be 200 to 300 hundred feet above the site .
It was reported the drones had spotlights on while approaching the site that they turned off when they entered the Security Owner Controlled Area .
Drones were first noticed at 2050 MST and are still over the site as of 2147 MST .
Security Posture was normal , which was changed to elevated when the drones were noticed .
The Licensee notified one of the NRC resident inspectors .
And on a subsequent night , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system !
Protect yourself from tyranny and economic collapse .
Learn to live free and spread peace !
- Trends & Strategies for Maximum Freedom Four ( 4 ) drones were observed flying beginning at 2051 MST [ on Sept. 30 , 2019 ] and continuing through the time of this report ( 2113 MST ) .
As occurred last night , the drones are flying in , through , and around the owner controlled area , the security owner controlled area , and the protected area .
Also , as last night @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with red and white flashing lights .
Spotlights have not been noted tonight .
The licensee has not changed their security posture .
The licensee continues to monitor the drones .
As of 0355 EDT , no drones have been observed at the site since before 0020 MST .
LLEA [ local law enforcement agency ] surveyed the area and were unable to locate drones on the ground or anyone controlling the drones .
Guards at the high-security facility were without any ability to deter the drones overhead .
Subsequent media reports in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going public say that county police were deployed to scour the area for the drone operator or operators but to no avail .
The whole unsolved incident highlights that it appears America ’ s network of nuclear power sites essentially remain defenseless when it comes to drone incursions .
It appears that at least at the Palo Verde site , the facility was not equipped with drone detection gear or jamming technology which could have disabled the drones .
However , the sprawling facility is reportedly due to receive drone and small aircraft @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unknown whether other sensitive facilities are also due for a security upgrade .
Some details on America ’ s largest nuclear power plant at Palo Verde : Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Tyler Durden
A mysterious incident related to a serious breach of secure airspace over America’s largest nuclear power plant has been unearthed through Freedom of Information Act documents gained from the government.
It’s leading to new fears that America’s energy infrastructure is prone to attack and potentially being knocked offline, akin to the drone and missile attack which temporarily halted all Saudi oil exports last year at Aramco’s Abaqaiq oil processing facility. Forbes presents the astonishing details as follows:
A tiny armada of between four and six unmarked drones flew over the Palo Verde Generating Station nuclear power plant in Arizona on the nights of September 29 and 30, 2019, with plant security proving unable to stop them and authorities still uncertain who was operating them or why.
The newly accessed Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) documents had called the incident a “drone-a-palooza” as it involved swarms of inexpensive, likely off-the-shelf drones flying in large numbers over restricted airspace and near sensitive structures of Arizona’s Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant.
The documents conclude that it’s still as yet unknown who or what entity sent them or who was operating them during the illegal incursion.
“Documents gained under the Freedom of Information Act show how a number of small drones flew around a restricted area at Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant on two successive nights last September,” Forbes writes further. “Security forces watched, but were apparently helpless to act as the drones carried out their incursions before disappearing into the night. Details of the event gives some clues as to just what they were doing, but who sent them remains a mystery.”
The FOIA documents underscore the incident was confusing and chaotic for security on the ground, as the security logs suggest:
Officer noticed several drones (5 or 6) flying over the site. The drones are circling the 3 unit site inside and outside the Protected Area. The drones have flashing red and white rights and are estimated to be 200 to 300 hundred feet above the site. It was reported the drones had spotlights on while approaching the site that they turned off when they entered the Security Owner Controlled Area. Drones were first noticed at 2050 MST and are still over the site as of 2147 MST. Security Posture was normal, which was changed to elevated when the drones were noticed. The Licensee notified one of the NRC resident inspectors.
And on a subsequent night, the logs indicate:
Four (4) drones were observed flying beginning at 2051 MST [on Sept. 30, 2019] and continuing through the time of this report (2113 MST). As occurred last night, the drones are flying in, through, and around the owner controlled area, the security owner controlled area, and the protected area. Also, as last night, the drones are described as large with red and white flashing lights. Spotlights have not been noted tonight. The licensee has not changed their security posture. The licensee continues to monitor the drones. As of 0355 EDT, no drones have been observed at the site since before 0020 MST. LLEA [local law enforcement agency] surveyed the area and were unable to locate drones on the ground or anyone controlling the drones.
Guards at the high-security facility were without any ability to deter the drones overhead. Subsequent media reports in the wake of the internal security memos going public say that county police were deployed to scour the area for the drone operator or operators but to no avail.
The whole unsolved incident highlights that it appears America’s network of nuclear power sites essentially remain defenseless when it comes to drone incursions.
It appears that at least at the Palo Verde site, the facility was not equipped with drone detection gear or jamming technology which could have disabled the drones. However, the sprawling facility is reportedly due to receive drone and small aircraft detection gear, but it’s unknown whether other sensitive facilities are also due for a security upgrade.
* * *
Some details on America’s largest nuclear power plant at Palo Verde:
Source: Zerohedge
Image: The Mind Unleashed
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.