activistpost--2020-12-09--No Privacy, No Property: The World in 2030 According to the WEF

The World Economic Forum ( WEF ) was founded fifty years ago .
It has gained more and more prominence over the decades and has become one of the leading platforms of futuristic thinking and planning .
As a meeting place of the global elite , the WEF brings together the leaders in business and politics along with a few selected intellectuals .
The main thrust of the forum is global control .
Free markets and individual choice do not stand as the top values , but state interventionism and collectivism .
Individual liberty and private property are to disappear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the projections and scenarios coming from the World Economic Forum .
Individual liberty is at risk again .
What may lie ahead was projected in November 2016 when the WEF published “ 8 Predictions for the World in 2030.
” According to the WEF ’ s scenario , the world will become quite a different place from now because how people work and live will undergo a profound change .
The scenario for the world 2030 is more than just a forecast .
It is a plan whose implementation has accelerated drastically since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the consequent lockdowns .
According to the projections of the WEF ’ s “ Global Future Councils , ” private property and privacy will be abolished during the next decade .
The coming expropriation would go further than even the communist demand to abolish the property of production goods but leave space for private possessions .
The WEF projection says that consumer goods , too , would be no longer private property .
If the WEF projection should come true , people would have to rent and borrow their necessities from the state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of all goods .
The supply of goods would be rationed in line with a social credit points system .
Shopping in the traditional sense would disappear along with the private purchases of goods .
Every personal move would be tracked electronically , and all production would be subject to the requirements of clean energy and a sustainable environment .
In order to attain “ sustainable agriculture , ” the food supply will be mainly vegetarian .
In the new totalitarian service economy , the government will provide basic accommodation , food , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be lent from the state .
The use of natural resources will be brought down to its minimum .
In cooperation with the few key countries , a global agency would set the price of CO emissions at an extremely high level to disincentivize its use .
In a promotional video , the World Economic Forum summarizes the eight predictions in the following statements : • People will own nothing .
Goods are either free of charge or must be lent from the state .
• The United States will no longer be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of countries will dominate .
• Organs will not be transplanted but printed .
• Massive displacement of people will take place with billions of refugees .
• To limit the emission of carbon dioxide , a global price will be set at an exorbitant level .
• People can prepare to go to Mars and start a journey to find alien life .
• Western values will be tested to the breaking point .
In a publication for the World Economic Forum , the Danish ecoactivist Ida Auken who had served as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ environment from 2011 to 2014 and still is a member of the Danish Parliament ( the Folketing ) as elaborated a scenario of a world without privacy or property .
In “ Welcome to 2030 , ” she envisions a world where “ I own nothing , have no privacy , and life has never been better.
” By 2030 , so says her scenario , shopping and owning have become obsolete , because everything that once was a product is now a service .
In this idyllic new world of hers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accommodation , food , “ and all the things we need in our daily lives.
” As these things will become free of charge , “ it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
” There would be no private ownership in houses nor would anyone pay rent , “ because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it.
” A person ’ s living room , for example , will be used for business meetings when one is absent .
Concerns like “ lifestyle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crisis , environmental degradation , completely congested cities , water pollution , air pollution , social unrest and unemployment ” are things of the past .
The author predicts that people will be happy to enjoy such a good life that is so much better “ than the path we were on , where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth.
” In her 2019 contribution to the Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils of the World Economic Forum , Ida Auken foretells how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ if we win the war on climate change.
” By 2030 , when CO emissions will be greatly reduced , people will live in a world where meet on the dinner plate “ will be a rare sight ” while water and the air will be much cleaner than today .
Because of the shift from buying goods to using services , the need to have money will vanish , because people will spend less and less on goods .
Work time will shrink and leisure time will grow .
For the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ electric cars have substituted conventional combustion vehicles .
Most of the roads and parking spaces will have become green parks and walking zones for pedestrians .
By 2030 , agriculture will offer mainly plant-based alternatives to the food supply instead of meat and dairy products .
The use of land to produce animal feed will greatly diminish and nature will be spreading across the globe again .
How can people be brought to accept such a system ?
The bait to entice the masses is the assurances of comprehensive healthcare and a guaranteed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Great Reset promise a world without diseases .
Due to biotechnologically produced organs and individualized genetics-based medical treatments , a drastically increased life expectancy and even immortality are said to be possible .
Artificial intelligence will eradicate death and eliminate disease and mortality .
The race is on among biotechnological companies to find the key to eternal life .
Along with the promise of turning any ordinary person into a godlike superman , the promise of a “ universal basic income ” is highly attractive , particularly to those who will no longer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economy .
Obtaining a basic income without having to go through the treadmill and disgrace of applying for social assistance is used as a bait to get the support of the poor .
To make it economically viable , the guarantee of a basic income would require the leveling of wage differences .
The technical procedures of the money transfer from the state will be used to promote the cashless society .
With the digitization of all monetary transactions , each individual purchase will be registered .
As a consequence , the governmental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in detail how individual persons spend their money .
A universal basic income in a cashless society would provide the conditions to impose a social credit system and deliver the mechanism to sanction undesirable behavior and identify the superfluous and unwanted .
Who Will Be the Rulers ?
The World Economic Forum is silent about the question of who will rule in this new world .
There is no reason to expect that the new power holders would be benevolent .
Yet even if the top decision-makers of the new world government were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reason would an administrative technocracy have to go on with the undesirables ?
What sense does it make for a technocratic elite to turn the common man into a superman ?
Why share the benefits of artificial intelligence with the masses and not keep the wealth for the chosen few ?
Not being swayed away by the utopian promises , a sober assessment of the plans must come to the conclusion that in this new world , there would be no place for the average person and that they would be put away @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ feeble minded , ” and “ ill bred.
” Behind the preaching of the progressive gospel of social justice by the promoters of the Great Reset and the establishment of a new world order lurks the sinister project of eugenics , which as a technique is now called “ genetic engineering ” and as a movement is named “ transhumanism , ” a term was coined by Julian Huxley , the first director of the UNESCO .
The promoters of the project keep silent about who will be the rulers in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nature of these projections and plans is the result of the rejection of free capitalism .
Establishing a better world through a dictatorship is a contradiction in terms .
Not less but more economic prosperity is the answer to the current problems .
Therefore , we need more free markets and less state planning .
The world is getting greener and a fall in the growth rate of the world population is already underway .
These trends are the natural consequence of wealth creation through free markets .
The World Economic Forum and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ handful of governments and a few high-tech companies want to lead the world into a new era without property or privacy .
Values like individualism , liberty , and the pursuit of happiness are at stake , to be repudiated in favor of collectivism and the imposition of a “ common good ” that is defined by the self-proclaimed elite of technocrats .
What is sold to the public as the promise of equality and ecological sustainability is in fact a brutal assault on human dignity and liberty .
Instead of using the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Great Reset seeks to use the technological possibilities as a tool of enslavement .
In this new world order , the state is the single owner of everything .
It is left to our imagination to figure out who will program the algorithms that manage the distribution of the goods and services .
Dr. Antony P. Mueller is a German professor of economics who currently teaches in Brazil .
Write an email .
See his website and blog .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Antony P. Mueller
The World Economic Forum (WEF) was founded fifty years ago. It has gained more and more prominence over the decades and has become one of the leading platforms of futuristic thinking and planning. As a meeting place of the global elite, the WEF brings together the leaders in business and politics along with a few selected intellectuals. The main thrust of the forum is global control. Free markets and individual choice do not stand as the top values, but state interventionism and collectivism. Individual liberty and private property are to disappear from this planet until 2030 according to the projections and scenarios coming from the World Economic Forum.
Eight Predictions
Individual liberty is at risk again. What may lie ahead was projected in November 2016 when the WEF published “8 Predictions for the World in 2030.” According to the WEF’s scenario, the world will become quite a different place from now because how people work and live will undergo a profound change. The scenario for the world 2030 is more than just a forecast. It is a plan whose implementation has accelerated drastically since with the announcement of a pandemic and the consequent lockdowns.
According to the projections of the WEF’s “Global Future Councils,” private property and privacy will be abolished during the next decade. The coming expropriation would go further than even the communist demand to abolish the property of production goods but leave space for private possessions. The WEF projection says that consumer goods, too, would be no longer private property.
If the WEF projection should come true, people would have to rent and borrow their necessities from the state, which would be the sole proprietor of all goods. The supply of goods would be rationed in line with a social credit points system. Shopping in the traditional sense would disappear along with the private purchases of goods. Every personal move would be tracked electronically, and all production would be subject to the requirements of clean energy and a sustainable environment.
In order to attain “sustainable agriculture,” the food supply will be mainly vegetarian. In the new totalitarian service economy, the government will provide basic accommodation, food, and transport, while the rest must be lent from the state. The use of natural resources will be brought down to its minimum. In cooperation with the few key countries, a global agency would set the price of CO 2 emissions at an extremely high level to disincentivize its use.
In a promotional video, the World Economic Forum summarizes the eight predictions in the following statements:
People will own nothing. Goods are either free of charge or must be lent from the state. The United States will no longer be the leading superpower, but a handful of countries will dominate. Organs will not be transplanted but printed. Meat consumption will be minimized. Massive displacement of people will take place with billions of refugees. To limit the emission of carbon dioxide, a global price will be set at an exorbitant level. People can prepare to go to Mars and start a journey to find alien life. Western values will be tested to the breaking point.
Beyond Privacy and Property
In a publication for the World Economic Forum, the Danish ecoactivist Ida Auken who had served as her country’s minister of the environment from 2011 to 2014 and still is a member of the Danish Parliament (the Folketing) as elaborated a scenario of a world without privacy or property. In “Welcome to 2030,” she envisions a world where “I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.” By 2030, so says her scenario, shopping and owning have become obsolete, because everything that once was a product is now a service.
In this idyllic new world of hers, people have free access to transportation, accommodation, food, “and all the things we need in our daily lives.” As these things will become free of charge, “it ended up not making sense for us to own much.” There would be no private ownership in houses nor would anyone pay rent, “because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it.” A person’s living room, for example, will be used for business meetings when one is absent. Concerns like “lifestyle diseases, climate change, the refugee crisis, environmental degradation, completely congested cities, water pollution, air pollution, social unrest and unemployment” are things of the past. The author predicts that people will be happy to enjoy such a good life that is so much better “than the path we were on, where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth.”
Ecological Paradise
In her 2019 contribution to the Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils of the World Economic Forum, Ida Auken foretells how the world may look in the future “if we win the war on climate change.” By 2030, when CO 2 emissions will be greatly reduced, people will live in a world where meet on the dinner plate “will be a rare sight” while water and the air will be much cleaner than today. Because of the shift from buying goods to using services, the need to have money will vanish, because people will spend less and less on goods. Work time will shrink and leisure time will grow.
For the future, Auken envisions a city where electric cars have substituted conventional combustion vehicles. Most of the roads and parking spaces will have become green parks and walking zones for pedestrians. By 2030, agriculture will offer mainly plant-based alternatives to the food supply instead of meat and dairy products. The use of land to produce animal feed will greatly diminish and nature will be spreading across the globe again.
Fabricating Social Consent
How can people be brought to accept such a system? The bait to entice the masses is the assurances of comprehensive healthcare and a guaranteed basic income. The promoters of the Great Reset promise a world without diseases. Due to biotechnologically produced organs and individualized genetics-based medical treatments, a drastically increased life expectancy and even immortality are said to be possible. Artificial intelligence will eradicate death and eliminate disease and mortality. The race is on among biotechnological companies to find the key to eternal life.
Along with the promise of turning any ordinary person into a godlike superman, the promise of a “universal basic income” is highly attractive, particularly to those who will no longer find a job in the new digital economy. Obtaining a basic income without having to go through the treadmill and disgrace of applying for social assistance is used as a bait to get the support of the poor.
To make it economically viable, the guarantee of a basic income would require the leveling of wage differences. The technical procedures of the money transfer from the state will be used to promote the cashless society. With the digitization of all monetary transactions, each individual purchase will be registered. As a consequence, the governmental authorities would have unrestricted access to supervise in detail how individual persons spend their money. A universal basic income in a cashless society would provide the conditions to impose a social credit system and deliver the mechanism to sanction undesirable behavior and identify the superfluous and unwanted.
Who Will Be the Rulers?
The World Economic Forum is silent about the question of who will rule in this new world.
There is no reason to expect that the new power holders would be benevolent. Yet even if the top decision-makers of the new world government were not mean but just technocrats, what reason would an administrative technocracy have to go on with the undesirables? What sense does it make for a technocratic elite to turn the common man into a superman? Why share the benefits of artificial intelligence with the masses and not keep the wealth for the chosen few?
Not being swayed away by the utopian promises, a sober assessment of the plans must come to the conclusion that in this new world, there would be no place for the average person and that they would be put away along with the “unemployable,” “feeble minded,” and “ill bred.” Behind the preaching of the progressive gospel of social justice by the promoters of the Great Reset and the establishment of a new world order lurks the sinister project of eugenics, which as a technique is now called “genetic engineering” and as a movement is named “transhumanism,” a term was coined by Julian Huxley, the first director of the UNESCO.
The promoters of the project keep silent about who will be the rulers in this new world. The dystopian and collectivist nature of these projections and plans is the result of the rejection of free capitalism. Establishing a better world through a dictatorship is a contradiction in terms. Not less but more economic prosperity is the answer to the current problems. Therefore, we need more free markets and less state planning. The world is getting greener and a fall in the growth rate of the world population is already underway. These trends are the natural consequence of wealth creation through free markets.
Conclusion
The World Economic Forum and its related institutions in combination with a handful of governments and a few high-tech companies want to lead the world into a new era without property or privacy. Values like individualism, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are at stake, to be repudiated in favor of collectivism and the imposition of a “common good” that is defined by the self-proclaimed elite of technocrats. What is sold to the public as the promise of equality and ecological sustainability is in fact a brutal assault on human dignity and liberty. Instead of using the new technologies as an instrument of betterment, the Great Reset seeks to use the technological possibilities as a tool of enslavement. In this new world order, the state is the single owner of everything. It is left to our imagination to figure out who will program the algorithms that manage the distribution of the goods and services.
Source: Mises.org
Dr. Antony P. Mueller is a German professor of economics who currently teaches in Brazil. Write an email. See his website and blog.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-09--Water Futures Begin Trading on the CME

Water Futures Begin Trading on the CME

According to a slew of mainstream media outlets , water futures have begun trading on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange ( CME ) .
Some might say that this is a great triumph for free markets everywhere .
But , does everything need to be traded as a financial instrument ?
Free markets are great , but when we consider the incredibly high levels of corruption exhibited by this establishment , it makes one pause .
Water is life .
More than half of the Human body is comprised of water .
Clean drinking water is essential for Human health .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ futures , serious new questions are raised .
Where does it stop ?
Do we trade Human lives on financial markets ?
Are these markets really free ?
Or are they actually highly controlled by powerful special interests ?
Adding to these prima facie concerns is the body of evidence indicating the reality of today ’ s geoengineering activities which are , in largest part , designed to control the deposition of atmospheric water .
If the reader is not aware of today ’ s geoengineering operations , there is so much evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fit in a short article .
If the reader needs to get up to speed as to how today ’ s domestic weather is controlled , please refer to the author ’ s book Chemtrails Exposed : A New Manhattan Project now available exclusively at Amazon .
The trading of water futures immediately brings to mind what General George Kenney told MIT ’ s graduating class of 1947 .
From the podium he said , Today , through the spraying of chemtrails , atmospheric tracing techniques , and the application of directed energy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ controlled .
Insider foreknowledge of these geoengineering activities could give individuals and organizations an unfair advantage in this new water futures market .
Enron originated these types of markets .
They started today ’ s weather derivatives market .
Yes , that Enron .
In today ’ s weather derivatives market one can bet on a whole range of geophysical conditions , including rainfall .
All this is quite interesting when considering the fact that today ’ s weather derivatives market is founded in weather modification activities and the spraying of chemtrails .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ article from May of this year titled “ Weather Derivatives , Temperature Modification , and CHEMTRAILS : The Smoking Guns.
” I wish that I could confidently say that there is no limit to free markets .
If we had a benevolent establishment and a highly-functioning judicial system , then I would probably be OK with the CME ’ s water futures .
But we don ’ t have either .
So , the trading of water futures is , sadly , just one more thing to be concerned about .
God , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New World Order out of business once and for all ?
Then we won ’ t have to worry about stuff like this anymore .
Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael , CA researcher , author , and activist .
Please buy the greatly revised and expanded second edition of his book Chemtrails Exposed : A New Manhattan Project available now exclusively at Amazon .
Also please join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Peter A. Kirby
According to a slew of mainstream media outlets, water futures have begun trading on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). Some might say that this is a great triumph for free markets everywhere. But, does everything need to be traded as a financial instrument? Free markets are great, but when we consider the incredibly high levels of corruption exhibited by this establishment, it makes one pause.
Water is life. More than half of the Human body is comprised of water. Clean drinking water is essential for Human health. With the commencement of trading in water futures, serious new questions are raised. Where does it stop? Do we trade Human lives on financial markets? Are these markets really free? Or are they actually highly controlled by powerful special interests?
Adding to these prima facie concerns is the body of evidence indicating the reality of today’s geoengineering activities which are, in largest part, designed to control the deposition of atmospheric water. If the reader is not aware of today’s geoengineering operations, there is so much evidence for this that it could not nearly fit in a short article. If the reader needs to get up to speed as to how today’s domestic weather is controlled, please refer to the author’s book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project now available exclusively at Amazon.
The trading of water futures immediately brings to mind what General George Kenney told MIT’s graduating class of 1947. From the podium he said,
The nation that first learns to plot the paths of air masses accurately and learns to control the time and place of precipitation will dominate the globe.
Today, through the spraying of chemtrails, atmospheric tracing techniques, and the application of directed energy, the deposition of rainfall is highly controlled. Insider foreknowledge of these geoengineering activities could give individuals and organizations an unfair advantage in this new water futures market.
Enron originated these types of markets. They started today’s weather derivatives market. Yes, that Enron. In today’s weather derivatives market one can bet on a whole range of geophysical conditions, including rainfall. All this is quite interesting when considering the fact that today’s weather derivatives market is founded in weather modification activities and the spraying of chemtrails. For more info, check out my article from May of this year titled “Weather Derivatives, Temperature Modification, and CHEMTRAILS: The Smoking Guns.”
I wish that I could confidently say that there is no limit to free markets. If we had a benevolent establishment and a highly-functioning judicial system, then I would probably be OK with the CME’s water futures. But we don’t have either. So, the trading of water futures is, sadly, just one more thing to be concerned about.
God, when are we going to put the New World Order out of business once and for all? Then we won’t have to worry about stuff like this anymore.
Links
Websites
Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. Please buy the greatly revised and expanded second edition of his book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project available now exclusively at Amazon. Also please join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-10--Safe Harbor, Texas Hold’em And Forensics

Editor ’ s Note : Activist Post does not endorse any candidate for president or any other political office .
This article is presented for informational purposes only and all opinions are the author ’ s alone .
December 8th marked the “ Safe Harbor Day Deadline ” which is when states typically need to certify election results .
However , some constitutional experts say the deadline does not apply to disputed states .
And that more time is needed to properly investigate ballot irregularities and voting anomalies .
“ The ONLY Electoral College deadline specifically required by the Constitution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which point Trump ’ s first term officially ends , ” Phillip Kline of The Amistad Project tweeted Tuesday .
According to a press release from The Amistad Project , “ the December 8 ‘ safe harbor ’ deadline for appointing presidential Electors does not apply to states where flagrant violations of state election laws affected the outcome of the popular vote .
In fact , the only Constitutionally-set date in the election process is the assumption of office by the President on January 20.
” Please follow Maryam Henein on Twitter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ https : //www.patreon.com/ maryamhenein The Amistad Project has filed litigation in several key swing states arguing that illegal conduct by state and local officials led to more than 1.2 million potentially fraudulent ballots , including illegal votes that were counted and legal votes that were not counted .
In each state , the number of potentially fraudulent ballots far exceeds the margin separating the leading presidential candidate .
Meanwhile , Michigan is still waiting on the report from a forensic audit of Dominion voting machines in Antrim County mentioned in a previous piece @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who filed a lawsuit on Friday on behalf of Central Lake resident William Bailey , claims that Dominion Voting Systems “ committed material fraud or error in this election so that the outcome of the election was affected.
” DePerno was granted permission to conduct a forensic study of the 16 Dominion voting machines , tabulators , thumb drives , related software , and the Clerk ’ s “ master tabulator.
” “ My forensic team is still reviewing the information , and we hope to get a report completed tonight , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , December 9th .
There is currently a protective order that doesn ’ t permit his team to share the findings — if fruitful of fraud — with the Trump administration or anyone else .
Meanwhile , State Rep. Matt Hall , the Republican who chairs the Michigan House Oversight Committee sent a follow-up letter to Dominion CEO John Poulos asking , yet again , to help answer a few questions to help lawmakers and voters better understand the election software .
Hall even said he was amenable to Zoom but that if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was prepared to issue a legislative subpoena to ‘ compel ’ an appearance .
Read more in The Epoch Times .
Poulos grew Dominion through direct support to elections in Mongolia and the Philippines .
He also co-founded The Delian Project , a non-governmental organization that “ aims to help post-conflict and emerging democracies implement positive change in their electoral process through the application of technology.
” Critics have linked The Delian Project and Democrats .
It turns out the Clinton Foundation invested $ 2.25 million in Dominion Voting .
Interestingly , Poulos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in January on the topic of election security perspectives .
He mentioned Dominion being a U.S.-owned company , although it ’ s headquartered in Toronto .
Finally in a twist , Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a 92-page lawsuit in the US Supreme Court against Against Pennsylvania , Georgia , Michigan & Wisconsin .
A major point of the lawsuit is going to hinge on the fact that local officials in these 4 states changed voting policies , including the expansion of mail-in ballots because of the COVID-19 pandemic , without the permission @ @ @ @ @ @ @ writes Sarah Westall , challenges the defendant ’ s administration of the elections claiming the “ 2020 election suffered from significant and unconstitutional irregularities in the Defendant States.
” Also , check out the break down by World Wire News .
As mentioned in earlier pieces , the coronavirus was used as an excuse to redefine electoral laws .
“ My concerns began prior to the election over the increased effort to solicit voters during the Covid-19 pandemic who may not be legally able to vote , ” explains Brenda Savage of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a bipartisan nonprofit organization dedicated to assuring that elections are conducted legally .
She witnessed a push to offer mail-in ballots to all residents of voting age compared to the previous method of sending Absentee Ballot requests only to registered voters within municipalities by their Clerks .
Savage became a plaintiff in a suit filed by Thomas More Law Society through The Amistad Project due to the changes put forth by the Oakland County Clerk reducing the ability of registered voters to participate as Poll Challengers .
The lawsuit named Jocelyn Benson as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Government .
Intimidation was a theme in Michigan .
Aside from alleged ballot fraud , there were also accounts of poll challenge barriers .
Accounts detail that election officials systematically discriminated against Republican poll watchers and in favor of Democratic poll watchers and activists in enforcing rules — in particular , through abuse of “ social distancing ” requirements .
Savage can attest as she fielded dozens of affidavits via EIF .
Meanwhile , the lawsuit filed by Trump against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Wayne County officials was accompanied by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election challengers were allegedly blocked from having a sufficient view of the vote-counting process and that challenges against certain ballots were ignored .
As a result , ineligible ballots were tallied .
Challenger Mary Shinkle , for instance , was told by an election worker that she was not allowed to observe a ballot duplication because “ if [ democrats ] make a mistake then [ republicans ] would be all over us.
” Meanwhile , Jessy Jacob says she observed City of Detroit election workers and employees coaching and trying to coach @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Democrat party and improperly pre-date the absentee ballot .
“ I witnessed these workers and employees encouraging voters to do a straight Democrat ballot , ” she said at a Michigan state legislature hearing .
Later , Savage recounted how Jacob sought out her team members for support .
“ She came to us for protection as we are unbiased.
” Incidentally , a Michigan Secretary of State official told The Epoch Times during the hearing , that “ no actual evidence of any wrongdoing or fraud was presented , despite repeated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrat election officials also reportedly would applaud , cheer , and yell whenever a Republican challenger was ejected from the counting area .
The Trump lawsuit also mentioned the backdating of ballots and unverified voters .
For instance , Kayleigh Mcenany , a Wayne County election worker , stated in a sworn affidavit that she was instructed to falsify THOUSANDS of absentee ballots in Detroit .
Trump ’ s campaign withdrew their lawsuit on Nov. 19 .
Here ’ s a piece titled How Dead Voters Can Vote in Michigan .
Watch this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she was discriminated against .
In response to Trump ’ s lawsuit and allegations of election chicanery , Jake Rollow , Michigan Department of State spokesperson , said : To Certify Or Not To Certify The Michigan certification process was also rife with threats , intimidation , and drama .
On Friday , November 20th , amid the certification hoopla , President Donald Trump summoned Michigan ’ s Republican legislative leaders Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey and House Speaker Lee Chatfield to the White House .
The mainstream cast rumors on what they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in large part , COVID-19 relief .
On Saturday , November 21st , Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel and Michigan Republican Chair Laura Cox sent a letter to Michigan ’ s Board of State Canvassers to urge a delay in the certification .
“ To simply gloss over these irregularities now without a thorough audit would only foster feelings of distrust among Michigan ’ s electorate , ” the letter reads .
Yet on Monday , November 23rd , 11/23/2020 , following an over three-hour virtual meeting broadcast live by Michigan Board @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 3-0 , to move forward with the certification of the election results , despite allegations that 71 % of poll votes seemingly did not match in Wayne County .
After listening to the meeting for about an hour , my takeaway was that Democrats were shaming anyone who opposed certification , describing them as unpatriotic and suggesting that not certifying is a felony , which it ’ s not .
The Detroit News reported that Republican board member Aaron Van Langevelde crossed over to join the two Democratic board members in supporting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ board , Norm Shinkle , a Republican , abstained .
You can read Facebook Whistleblower Ryan Hartwig ’ s notes for more from that meeting .
That same day , an order to enjoin the certification with the Michigan Supreme Court against the City of Detroit and Michigan Democratic party was denied .
The two plaintiffs , Cheryl Costantino and Edward McCall , contended that “ the results of the November 2020 election [ are ] certified .
.
.
Plaintiffs will lose their right to audit its results , thereby losing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Indeed , the plain language of Const 1963 , art 2 , § 4 ( 1 ) ( h ) does not require an audit to precede the certification of election results .
Logically , you may assume that you need to audit before certification , but it seems it ’ s the opposite .
“ To the contrary , certified results would seem to be a prerequisite for such an audit… ” “ You can think of it this way until it ’ s certified , it remains theoretical , ” explains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chairman of the Federal Election Commission ( FEC ) .
Initially , Wayne County GOP members deadlocked with a 2-2 vote on the decision to certify election votes , and the two Republicans only agreed to move forward if they received a “ comprehensive audit.
” In an affidavit , Republicans Monica Palmer and William C. Hartmann said they later learned that state officials would not honor the audit to verify whether voter registration and votes cast balances out .
They felt they had no recourse but to oppose certification until more investigation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tactics , e.g .
being accused of being racist , as the reason for agreeing to finally certify the day prior .
The two tried to get the certification rescinded without luck .
Michigan officials went on the record to state the Board of Canvassers , who wanted to reverse their decision , were out of luck .
Michigan ’ s chief election officer said a post-election audit will be performed , though not to check “ mythical allegations ” of fraud .
“ There is no legal mechanism for them to rescind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the next step in the process is for the Board of State Canvassers to meet and certify , ” Tracy Wimmer , a spokeswoman for the Michigan secretary of state , reported to AP News .
Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson stated that trying to halt the certification process was “ nothing more than an attempt to misuse these roles to play partisan politics and cause confusion which , again , is kind of the norm that we ’ ve seen throughout this election.
” According to The Detroit News , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had taken place , they would be implementing a statewide risk-limiting audit and local procedural audits to affirm the integrity of the process and identify opportunities for improvement to strengthen elections “ even further in the months ahead.
” Note that there are different types of audits .
For instance , routine post-election audits check voting system performance in contests , regardless of how close margins of victory appear .
For these process-based audits , it would not appear critical whether they occur before the election results are finally certified , as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that could be used to perfect voting systems going forward .
What have those audits looked like in the past ?
How will they look this time around ?
Good to note : a review of election laws conducted in early 2018 similarly recommended that audits be undertaken “ after preliminary outcomes are announced , but before official certification of election results.
” Because this allows for “ correction of preliminary results if preliminary election outcomes are found to be incorrect.
” Purposefully confusing ?
Michigan ’ s audit manual says audits should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ board certification of results , or by Dec. 23 .
The Powell lawsuits assert that when it comes to Michigan , the results for the President in the November 3 , 2020 election must be set aside .
Arguably , Governor Whitmer , Secretary Benson , and other defendants violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment , which prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law .
In other words , the laws of a state must treat an individual in the same manner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ circumstances .
A violations of the Michigan Election Code is considered a felony .
“ You must know in your heart that this election was fraudulent , ” said one Republican poll observer who testified during the Michigan Senate Oversight Committee hearing on December 1st in Lansing .
“ There ’ s no question of it , if you really are sensible.
” Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Maryam Henein
Editor’s Note: Activist Post does not endorse any candidate for president or any other political office. This article is presented for informational purposes only and all opinions are the author’s alone.
Safe Harbor, Texas Hold’em And Forensics
Election security is not a partisan issue.
December 8th marked the “Safe Harbor Day Deadline” which is when states typically need to certify election results. However, some constitutional experts say the deadline does not apply to disputed states, and that more time is needed to properly investigate ballot irregularities and voting anomalies.
“The ONLY Electoral College deadline specifically required by the Constitution is noon on January 20, at which point Trump’s first term officially ends,” Phillip Kline of The Amistad Project tweeted Tuesday.
According to a press release from The Amistad Project, “the December 8 ‘safe harbor’ deadline for appointing presidential Electors does not apply to states where flagrant violations of state election laws affected the outcome of the popular vote. In fact, the only Constitutionally-set date in the election process is the assumption of office by the President on January 20.”
Please follow Maryam Henein on Twitter @maryamhenein
you can support her work on https://www.patreon.com/ maryamhenein
The Amistad Project has filed litigation in several key swing states arguing that illegal conduct by state and local officials led to more than 1.2 million potentially fraudulent ballots, including illegal votes that were counted and legal votes that were not counted. In each state, the number of potentially fraudulent ballots far exceeds the margin separating the leading presidential candidate.
Meanwhile, Michigan is still waiting on the report from a forensic audit of Dominion voting machines in Antrim County mentioned in a previous piece.
Matthew DePerno of DePerno Law Offices, who filed a lawsuit on Friday on behalf of Central Lake resident William Bailey, claims that Dominion Voting Systems “committed material fraud or error in this election so that the outcome of the election was affected.” DePerno was granted permission to conduct a forensic study of the 16 Dominion voting machines, tabulators, thumb drives, related software, and the Clerk’s “master tabulator.”
“My forensic team is still reviewing the information, and we hope to get a report completed tonight,” Matthew DePerno told Activist Post on Wednesday, December 9th. There is currently a protective order that doesn’t permit his team to share the findings — if fruitful of fraud — with the Trump administration or anyone else.
Meanwhile, State Rep. Matt Hall, the Republican who chairs the Michigan House Oversight Committee sent a follow-up letter to Dominion CEO John Poulos asking, yet again, to help answer a few questions to help lawmakers and voters better understand the election software. Hall even said he was amenable to Zoom but that if this letter was also ignored, he was prepared to issue a legislative subpoena to ‘compel’ an appearance.
Read more in The Epoch Times.
Poulos grew Dominion through direct support to elections in Mongolia and the Philippines. He also co-founded The Delian Project, a non-governmental organization that “aims to help post-conflict and emerging democracies implement positive change in their electoral process through the application of technology.” Critics have linked The Delian Project and Democrats. It turns out the Clinton Foundation invested $2.25 million in Dominion Voting.
Interestingly, Poulos testified before the Committee on House Administration in January on the topic of election security perspectives. He mentioned Dominion being a U.S.-owned company, although it’s headquartered in Toronto.
Finally in a twist, Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a 92-page lawsuit in the US Supreme Court against Against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan & Wisconsin. A major point of the lawsuit is going to hinge on the fact that local officials in these 4 states changed voting policies, including the expansion of mail-in ballots because of the COVID-19 pandemic, without the permission of state legislatures.
The claim, writes Sarah Westall, challenges the defendant’s administration of the elections claiming the “2020 election suffered from significant and unconstitutional irregularities in the Defendant States.”
Also, check out the breakdown by World Wire News.
Local officials do not have the constitutional authority to change voting procedures regardless of whatever COVID-related emergency power they may have.
President Trump says at least 17 States have joined Texas in the case against Election Fraud.
Power Tripping At The Polls
As mentioned in earlier pieces, the coronavirus was used as an excuse to redefine electoral laws.
“My concerns began prior to the election over the increased effort to solicit voters during the COVID-19 pandemic who may not be legally able to vote,” explains Brenda Savage of the Election Integrity Fund (EIF), a bipartisan nonprofit organization dedicated to assuring that elections are conducted legally.
She witnessed a push to offer mail-in ballots to all residents of voting age compared to the previous method of sending Absentee Ballot requests only to registered voters within municipalities by their Clerks.
Savage became a plaintiff in a suit filed by Thomas More Law Society through The Amistad Project due to the changes put forth by the Oakland County Clerk, reducing the ability of registered voters to participate as Poll Challengers. The lawsuit named Jocelyn Benson as Secretary of State and the Oakland County Government.
We filed prior to the election with an emergency request for hearing due to the fact that we could not get answers to the request for info from the Oakland County Clerk until just before the election. The answer at that time was that only 3 Poll Challengers would be allowed to participate in the Absentee Ballot counting for 16 municipalities which were being counted at a central location.
Intimidation was a theme in Michigan. Aside from alleged ballot fraud, there were also accounts of poll challenge barriers.
Accounts detail that election officials systematically discriminated against Republican poll watchers and in favor of Democratic poll watchers and activists in enforcing rules — in particular, through abuse of “social distancing” requirements. Savage can attest as she fielded dozens of affidavits via EIF.
Meanwhile, the lawsuit filed by Trump against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Wayne County officials was accompanied by 234 pages of sworn affidavits. Credentialed election challengers were allegedly blocked from having a sufficient view of the vote-counting process and that challenges against certain ballots were ignored. As a result, ineligible ballots were tallied.
Challenger Mary Shinkle, for instance, was told by an election worker that she was not allowed to observe a ballot duplication because “if [democrats] make a mistake then [republicans] would be all over us.”
Meanwhile, Jessy Jacob says she observed City of Detroit election workers and employees coaching and trying to coach voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party and improperly pre-date the absentee ballot.
“I witnessed these workers and employees encouraging voters to do a straight Democrat ballot,” she said at a Michigan state legislature hearing.
Later, Savage recounted how Jacob sought out her team members for support. “She came to us for protection as we are unbiased.”
Incidentally, a Michigan Secretary of State official told The Epoch Times during the hearing, that “no actual evidence of any wrongdoing or fraud was presented, despite repeated questions requesting such evidence from lawmakers.”
Democrat election officials also reportedly would applaud, cheer, and yell whenever a Republican challenger was ejected from the counting area. The Trump lawsuit also mentioned the backdating of ballots and unverified voters. For instance, a Wayne County election worker stated in a sworn affidavit that she was instructed to falsify THOUSANDS of absentee ballots in Detroit. Trump’s campaign withdrew their lawsuit on Nov. 19.
Here’s a piece titled How Dead Voters Can Vote in Michigan. Watch this Trump poll watcher from Michigan who says she was discriminated against.
In response to Trump’s lawsuit and allegations of election chicanery, Jake Rollow, Michigan Department of State spokesperson, said:
This is the same kind of irresponsible false rhetoric and misinformation that we saw throughout the election. [The lawsuit] is a press release masquerading as a legal claim designed to promote false claims aimed at eroding the public’s confidence in Michigan elections. But it does not change the truth: Michigan’s elections were conducted fairly, securely, transparently, and the results are an accurate reflection of the will of the people.
To Certify Or Not To Certify
The Michigan certification process was also rife with threats, intimidation, and drama.
On Friday, November 20th, amid the certification hoopla, President Donald Trump summoned Michigan’s Republican legislative leaders Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey and House Speaker Lee Chatfield to the White House. The mainstream cast rumors on what they would discuss. Later reports they discussed in large part, COVID-19 relief.
On Saturday, November 21st, Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel and Michigan Republican Chair Laura Cox sent a letter to Michigan’s Board of State Canvassers to urge a delay in the certification.
“To simply gloss over these irregularities now without a thorough audit would only foster feelings of distrust among Michigan’s electorate,” the letter reads.
Yet on Monday, November 23rd, 11/23/2020, following an over three-hour virtual meeting broadcast live by Michigan Board of State Canvassers, it was decided, 3-0, to move forward with the certification of the election results, despite allegations that 71% of poll votes seemingly did not match in Wayne County.
After listening to the meeting for about an hour, my takeaway was that Democrats were shaming anyone who opposed certification, describing them as unpatriotic and suggesting that not certifying is a felony, which it’s not.
The Detroit News reported that Republican board member Aaron Van Langevelde crossed over to join the two Democratic board members in supporting certification. A fourth member of the board, Norm Shinkle, a Republican, abstained. You can read Facebook Whistleblower Ryan Hartwig’s notes for more from that meeting.
That same day, an order to enjoin the certification with the Michigan Supreme Court against the City of Detroit and Michigan Democratic party was denied. The two plaintiffs, Cheryl Costantino and Edward McCall, contended that “the results of the November 2020 election [are] certified . . . Plaintiffs will lose their right to audit its results, thereby losing the rights guaranteed under the Michigan Constitution.”
Indeed, the plain language of Const 1963, art 2, § 4(1)(h) does not require an audit to precede the certification of election results. Logically, you may assume that you need to audit before certification, but it seems it’s the opposite. “To the contrary, certified results would seem to be a prerequisite for such an audit…”
“You can think of it this way until it’s certified, it remains theoretical,” explains Trey Trainor, Commissioner, and current Chairman of the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
Initially, Wayne County GOP members deadlocked with a 2-2 vote on the decision to certify election votes, and the two Republicans only agreed to move forward if they received a “comprehensive audit.” In an affidavit, Republicans Monica Palmer and William C. Hartmann said they later learned that state officials would not honor the audit to verify whether voter registration and votes cast balances out. They felt they had no recourse but to oppose certification until more investigation could be performed.
They cited bullying tactics, e.g. being accused of being racist, as the reason for agreeing to finally certify the day prior. The two tried to get the certification rescinded without luck. Michigan officials went on the record to state the Board of Canvassers, who wanted to reverse their decision, were out of luck.
Michigan’s chief election officer said a post-election audit will be performed, though not to check “mythical allegations” of fraud.
“There is no legal mechanism for them to rescind their vote. Their job is done, and the next step in the process is for the Board of State Canvassers to meet and certify,” Tracy Wimmer, a spokeswoman for the Michigan secretary of state, reported to AP News.
Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson stated that trying to halt the certification process was “nothing more than an attempt to misuse these roles to play partisan politics and cause confusion which, again, is kind of the norm that we’ve seen throughout this election.”
According to The Detroit News, she also stated that now that certification had taken place, they would be implementing a statewide risk-limiting audit and local procedural audits to affirm the integrity of the process and identify opportunities for improvement to strengthen elections “even further in the months ahead.”
Note that there are different types of audits. For instance, routine post-election audits check voting system performance in contests, regardless of how close margins of victory appear. For these process-based audits, it would not appear critical whether they occur before the election results are finally certified, as the audit is intended to gather the information that could be used to perfect voting systems going forward. What have those audits looked like in the past? How will they look this time around?
Good to note: a review of election laws conducted in early 2018 similarly recommended that audits be undertaken “after preliminary outcomes are announced, but before official certification of election results.” Because this allows for “correction of preliminary results if preliminary election outcomes are found to be incorrect.” Purposefully confusing?
Michigan’s audit manual says audits should take place within 30 days of the board certification of results, or by Dec. 23. The Powell lawsuits assert that when it comes to Michigan, the results for the President in the November 3, 2020 election must be set aside.
Arguably, Governor Whitmer, Secretary Benson, and other defendants violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. In other words, the laws of a state must treat an individual in the same manner as other people in similar conditions and circumstances. A violations of the Michigan Election Code is considered a felony.
“You must know in your heart that this election was fraudulent,” said one Republican poll observer who testified during the Michigan Senate Oversight Committee hearing on December 1st in Lansing. “There’s no question of it, if you really are sensible.”
Read Part 2: Designed For Fraud? Dominating In Antrim County
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-10--Unmanned SpaceX Starship Test Flight Explodes While Landing Adding to Long List of SpaceX Explosions

SpaceX ‘ s Starship rocket , a test flight for a vehicle expected to eventually carry passengers to the moon and Mars , exploded after launch Wednesday , making impact with the ground while trying to land .
The ship had no one aboard .
The launch and ascent were successful , but as the engines appeared to reignite for landing , the vehicle flipped back to vertical and then slammed into the ground .
The vehicle exploded on ground impact .
It had been expected to reach an altitude of about 41,000 feet on the test flight .
Despite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ combustible space vehicles , the Federal Communications Commission ( FCC ) is giving the company hundreds of millions of dollars to launch more satellites into space to blast 5G and WiFi at us .
NASA is giving SpaceX tens of millions for mission tech to put 4G on the moon .
Experts continue to warn that much could go wrong with all of this in addition to explosions .
But whatever , right .
Activist Post reports regularly about unsafe technology .
For more information visit our archives and the following websites .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
Another SpaceX contraption bites the dust.
From ABC News:
SpaceX‘s Starship rocket, a test flight for a vehicle expected to eventually carry passengers to the moon and Mars, exploded after launch Wednesday, making impact with the ground while trying to land. The ship had no one aboard. The launch and ascent were successful, but as the engines appeared to reignite for landing, the vehicle flipped back to vertical and then slammed into the ground. The vehicle exploded on ground impact. It had been expected to reach an altitude of about 41,000 feet on the test flight. Read full article
Despite SpaceX’s growing track record of combustible space vehicles, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is giving the company hundreds of millions of dollars to launch more satellites into space to blast 5G and WiFi at us.
NASA is giving SpaceX tens of millions for mission tech to put 4G on the moon. Experts continue to warn that much could go wrong with all of this in addition to explosions. But whatever, right.
Activist Post reports regularly about unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites.
Image: Pixabay
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-09--Is The Globalist “Reset” Failing? The Elites May Have Overplayed Their Hand

One aspect of narcopaths ( narcissistic sociopaths ) that is important to remember is that they live in their own little world in which their desires and bizarre dysfunctions are normalized .
They believe themselves superior to most people because they are predatory , and don ’ t suffer from annoying hang-ups like empathy and conscience .
They generally tend to believe they have pulled the wool over everyone ’ s eyes the majority of the time .
They think that you are a submissive idiot , and that when they bark an order , you will simply jump to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Almost every aspect of the globalists and their behavior indicates they are a club or cult of narcopaths .
Their obsessive need to control as well as to corrupt and destroy in order to get what they want is not an extension of mere greed , it is a deep-seated aspect of who they are as beings .
It is a defining mechanism at the core of their character .
They are real world monsters , like vampires attempting to blend into an unsuspecting population .
In their arrogance , then tend to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at will without being resisted or exposed .
The problem is , as soon as they start to feed and destroy they draw attention to themselves .
Eventually , they will attract the suspicions of the public , along with some vampire hunters .
Unless they find a way to hide a stake through the heart is inevitable .
I have been writing about the threats of globalism and the “ reset ” for many years now , and I have noted for some time two separate quandaries ; one affecting the liberty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : 1 ) First , criminals tend to brag about their crimes when they think that it ’ s too late for anyone to do anything about them .
I predicted the globalists would be very open in revealing their agenda the moment they believed themselves “ untouchable ” .
For the freedom loving public this suggests that in 2020 going into 2021 that the elites must think there is nothing that can be done to stop the machine ; they are so blatant in their calls for the global “ reset ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and a surveillance state that no one in their right mind can claim these notions are “ conspiracy theory ” anymore .
The fact is , the “ conspiracy theorists ” were RIGHT ALL ALONG , and now there is nothing anyone can say about it .
2 ) Second , I have also argued in the past that the globalist push for a “ new world order ” is a double edged sword that could very well end up annihilating them .
As they attempt to initiate their reset agenda , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can no longer lurk in the safety of the shadows and there is no going back once the process is started .
Once the globalists become widely known , they must either swiftly take control through engineered chaos and collapse , or face retribution that could eliminate a cabal that took them centuries to build .
Vampires must make the rest of the world a dark place before leaving the shadows , or they risk dying in the light of day .
There are two schools of thought in the liberty movement ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fixed and unstoppable and that the best anyone can do is survive .
The second suggests that the reset can be stopped and the globalists can be brought to justice .
I stand in both camps .
There are aspects of the reset that are indeed fixed and that can not be undone .
For example , numerous national economies including the US are in the midst of a stagflationary collapse and there is nothing that can be done to reverse it .
Perhaps a decade ago we could have changed course , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The pain can be reduced if people quickly end their dependency on the system and create localized trade networks of their own , but the economy as we know it right now is dead and it is not coming back anytime soon .
I do not see this , though , as a win for the elites .
Crashing the economy is one thing , rebuilding it into the collectivist dystopia they desperately want is another .
Everything depends on who rebuilds ; maybe it will be them , maybe it will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ signs these days that the globalist reset is NOT a sure thing , and those that know my work know I have never been one for misplaced optimism .
Specifically , the exploitation of the pandemic response as a means to ram through numerous draconian restrictions does not seem to be going exactly as the elites planned .
I have to look back at Event 201 to really gauge the state of the game , because what the elites planned and what has happened do not completely match up .
For those not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of “ war game ” held by globalists from the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
The scenario ?
A pandemic outbreak of a coronavirus which would spread like wildfire and kill a predicted 65 million people .
The simulation was held only a couple of months before the real thing happened at the start of 2020 .
In the year since the outbreak , the globalists have attempted to enforce nearly every plan that was outlined during Event 201 , including using social media to censor or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the establishment approved narrative ( Yes , narrative control was discussed at the event in great detail ) .
Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum has consistently and excitedly applauded the pandemic crisis as a “ perfect opportunity ” to institute the “ reset ” that the globalists have been talking about for years .
Unfortunately for them , the virus has not been anywhere near as deadly as they appear to have hoped .
With a death rate of well below 1 % for anyone outside of a nursing home with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been forced to pump up infection numbers as a means to terrorize the populace because the death numbers are not enough to convince people to willingly hand over their freedoms .
The Infection Fatality Rate ( IFR ) for Covid 19 not counting nursing home deaths with preexisting conditions is only 0.26 % of those infected .
There is a propaganda meme being passed around these days that tries to exaggerate the danger of death from Covid , and it goes a little something like this : “ Covid has killed more people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wars combined in a single year , therefore your freedoms are forfeit… ” This is an idiotic talking point but luckily no one is buying it .
Over 40 % of Covid deaths are people that are already sick and on the verge of dying anyway ( And no , refusing to wear masks is not the same as endorsing “ death panels ” , because a death panel is about socialists refusing treatment to people at risk because of their age .
No one is suggesting that old people be refused treatment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of staying under quarantine if they fear they will become infected .
They are already retired and receiving social security , perhaps if we are going to stimulate then the bailout money should go to those most at risk so that the rest of us can continue on with normal life ? )
Hundreds of thousands of people die every year from diseases and illnesses including the flu , common colds and pneumonia , yet , the prospect of abandoning the Bill of Rights , submitting to economic shutdowns and wearing a muzzle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never brought up before .
Why should we ask 99.7 % of Americans or the world to accept medical tyranny just to make .26 % of the population feel safe ?
People who question the mandates are called “ selfish ” , but even if I was one of the people susceptible to the virus , I would NEVER demand that 99 % of the population bow to totalitarianism at the off chance that I might live a little while longer .
Now THAT would be selfish .
As more and more studies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mandates are also coming into question .
Though Big Tech has sought to suppress or censor studies that run contrary to the mainstream narrative , this has only led more people to question the motivations of governments pushing the mandates .
After all , the mainstream media keeps saying that we should “ listen to the science ” , but they ignore or censor the science .
So , if the pandemic response is not based in science , then it must only be about control .
Many Americans are not as stupid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the inconsistencies in the rhetoric and the data and they are increasingly prone to refuse to comply .
This might be why the establishment is suddenly rushing out at least two Covid vaccines in the span of half a year ; they have to get the vaccine phase of the Reset underway before too many people jump from the panic bandwagon .
The vaccine rush and the claims of effectiveness of 94 % to 95 % from Pfizer and Moderna are suspect .
The average effectiveness of most vaccines is around 50 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with hundreds of trials and years of usage .
Somehow , Pfizer and Moderna were both able to produce a vaccine for a SARS type virus when multiple governments tried for over a decade to produce vaccines for SARS in China and were unsuccessful , and they were able to achieve 95 % effectiveness ?
Many people are not buying the vaccine story , and this is perhaps why the elites are jumping headlong into vaccination so fast .
Consider this fact : Numerous polls indicate that at least 1 in 3 Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is released to the general public .
60 % of Americans have stated in polls that they will not take the vaccine unless it is proven to be at least 75 % effective .
Here I think we have our explanation for the vaccination bonanza .
The elites know that a third of Americans ( and probably Europeans ) will not take the vaccine regardless of any propaganda they dish out .
They also know that 60 % of Americans are unlikely to take the vaccine unless they can show an effectiveness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Neither Moderna nor Pfizer have actually produced any evidence that their vaccines are capable of prevented severe illness or death from Covid , so , their effectiveness rate is based on “ projections ” of success according to their minimal trials .
Meaning , the effectiveness rate of 95 % is completely arbitrary .
Why did they go with such a high number instead of a more realistic 50 % to 60 % ?
Because the polls say they need an epic effectiveness rate in order to convince Americans to take the vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simple as that .
Americans are skeptical of the vaccines for a number of reasons .
The reality that they are minimally tested and rushed out in less than a year is one reason .
The fact that the government and the media have been caught censoring or lying about Covid data is another reason .
People just don ’ t trust the elites , and who can blame them ?
Who would trust a cabal of psychopaths to inject them with an unknown viral cocktail ?
Maybe their intentions are not so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be suspicious .
A former Pfizer vice president , Dr. Michael Yeadon among other medical professionals have recently warned that the vaccines have not been adequately tested and that there is a risk of “ indefinite infertility ” for women who take the current Covid vaccine due to damaging autoimmune response .
In other words , the vaccine could make many women barren and unable to have children .
Maybe this is what Bill Gates meant when he stated in his Ted Talk that “ vaccines and reproductive services ” could help contribute @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s population of 10 % to 15 % as a means to “ stop global warming .
Why would Bill Gates mention vaccines in the same breath as “ reproductive services ” in reference to population reduction ?
Aren ’ t vaccines supposed to help people live longer ?
Well , the Pfizer VP ’ s warning about the Covid vaccine is ringing bells for me .
Maybe the Covid vaccine won ’ t make you sick , or kill you .
Maybe you will live a long life free of coronavirus , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ few years after taking the vaccine that you won ’ t ever be able to have kids .
Watch the movie Children Of Men to get a sense of what the future might be like if the globalists get their way .
In the meantime , the elites are trying with everything they have to convince the public that they must abandon notions of civil liberties in the name of survival and “ the greater good ” .
They are already talking about how things will never go back to normal , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in place for many years to come .
Governments are in the media right now claiming the vaccines “ will not be mandatory ” .
This is a lie .
At the same time they are putting mandates in place to require you to prove you are vaccinated in order to go to public places and even to go to work .
Basically , you take the vaccine or you die from poverty .
This is not a choice .
But , I see millions of Americans standing in opposition to this agenda @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the country refusing to enforce the agenda , even in hard-left states like California .
I see protests in lockdown states like Michigan , California and New York .
I see mass protests in Europe .
I see the Reset scheme being exposed and the truth breaking into the mainstream .
I see something rising to the surface , and I smell that gunpowder scent of rebellion , and I like it .
I ’ m not pessimistic about the future .
I know a crash is coming .
I know a fight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I see is a fight that can and will be won by those that respect the principles of freedom .
The globalists may have overplayed their hand .
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda , subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch .
Learn more about it HERE .
With global tensions spiking , thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401 ( k ) into an IRA backed by physical gold .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tax Law , you can too .
Learn how with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group .
It reveals how physical precious metals can protect your savings , and how to open a Gold IRA .
Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold .
You can contact Brandon Smith at : [ email protected ] Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Brandon Smith
One aspect of narcopaths (narcissistic sociopaths) that is important to remember is that they live in their own little world in which their desires and bizarre dysfunctions are normalized. They believe themselves superior to most people because they are predatory, and don’t suffer from annoying hang-ups like empathy and conscience. They generally tend to believe they have pulled the wool over everyone’s eyes the majority of the time. They think that you are a submissive idiot, and that when they bark an order, you will simply jump to attention because you “believe”.
Almost every aspect of the globalists and their behavior indicates they are a club or cult of narcopaths. Their obsessive need to control as well as to corrupt and destroy in order to get what they want is not an extension of mere greed, it is a deep-seated aspect of who they are as beings. It is a defining mechanism at the core of their character. They are real world monsters, like vampires attempting to blend into an unsuspecting population.
In their arrogance, then tend to expect they can drain the public dry at will without being resisted or exposed. The problem is, as soon as they start to feed and destroy they draw attention to themselves. Eventually, they will attract the suspicions of the public, along with some vampire hunters. Unless they find a way to hide a stake through the heart is inevitable.
I have been writing about the threats of globalism and the “reset” for many years now, and I have noted for some time two separate quandaries; one affecting the liberty movement and the other affecting the globalists:
1) First, criminals tend to brag about their crimes when they think that it’s too late for anyone to do anything about them. I predicted the globalists would be very open in revealing their agenda the moment they believed themselves “untouchable”. For the freedom loving public this suggests that in 2020 going into 2021 that the elites must think there is nothing that can be done to stop the machine; they are so blatant in their calls for the global “reset”, a cashless society, totalitarian lockdowns and a surveillance state that no one in their right mind can claim these notions are “conspiracy theory” anymore.
The fact is, the “conspiracy theorists” were RIGHT ALL ALONG, and now there is nothing anyone can say about it.
2) Second, I have also argued in the past that the globalist push for a “new world order” is a double edged sword that could very well end up annihilating them. As they attempt to initiate their reset agenda, they become more and more exposed; they can no longer lurk in the safety of the shadows and there is no going back once the process is started. Once the globalists become widely known, they must either swiftly take control through engineered chaos and collapse, or face retribution that could eliminate a cabal that took them centuries to build. Vampires must make the rest of the world a dark place before leaving the shadows, or they risk dying in the light of day.
There are two schools of thought in the liberty movement; one suggesting that the globalist agenda is fixed and unstoppable and that the best anyone can do is survive. The second suggests that the reset can be stopped and the globalists can be brought to justice. I stand in both camps.
There are aspects of the reset that are indeed fixed and that cannot be undone. For example, numerous national economies including the US are in the midst of a stagflationary collapse and there is nothing that can be done to reverse it. Perhaps a decade ago we could have changed course, but now it is too late. The pain can be reduced if people quickly end their dependency on the system and create localized trade networks of their own, but the economy as we know it right now is dead and it is not coming back anytime soon.
I do not see this, though, as a win for the elites. Crashing the economy is one thing, rebuilding it into the collectivist dystopia they desperately want is another. Everything depends on who rebuilds; maybe it will be them, maybe it will be us.
I am seeing some encouraging signs these days that the globalist reset is NOT a sure thing, and those that know my work know I have never been one for misplaced optimism. Specifically, the exploitation of the pandemic response as a means to ram through numerous draconian restrictions does not seem to be going exactly as the elites planned.
I have to look back at Event 201 to really gauge the state of the game, because what the elites planned and what has happened do not completely match up. For those not familiar, Event 201 was a type of “war game” held by globalists from the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The scenario? A pandemic outbreak of a coronavirus which would spread like wildfire and kill a predicted 65 million people. The simulation was held only a couple of months before the real thing happened at the start of 2020.
In the year since the outbreak, the globalists have attempted to enforce nearly every plan that was outlined during Event 201, including using social media to censor or restrict any news or information outside of the establishment approved narrative (Yes, narrative control was discussed at the event in great detail). Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum has consistently and excitedly applauded the pandemic crisis as a “perfect opportunity” to institute the “reset” that the globalists have been talking about for years.
Unfortunately for them, the virus has not been anywhere near as deadly as they appear to have hoped. With a death rate of well below 1% for anyone outside of a nursing home with preexisting conditions, the establishment has now been forced to pump up infection numbers as a means to terrorize the populace because the death numbers are not enough to convince people to willingly hand over their freedoms. The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for Covid 19 not counting nursing home deaths with preexisting conditions is only 0.26% of those infected.
There is a propaganda meme being passed around these days that tries to exaggerate the danger of death from Covid, and it goes a little something like this:
“Covid has killed more people that the Vietnam War and the Gulf Wars combined in a single year, therefore your freedoms are forfeit…”
This is an idiotic talking point but luckily no one is buying it. Over 40% of Covid deaths are people that are already sick and on the verge of dying anyway (And no, refusing to wear masks is not the same as endorsing “death panels”, because a death panel is about socialists refusing treatment to people at risk because of their age. No one is suggesting that old people be refused treatment, and they always have the option of staying under quarantine if they fear they will become infected. They are already retired and receiving social security, perhaps if we are going to stimulate then the bailout money should go to those most at risk so that the rest of us can continue on with normal life?)
Hundreds of thousands of people die every year from diseases and illnesses including the flu, common colds and pneumonia, yet, the prospect of abandoning the Bill of Rights, submitting to economic shutdowns and wearing a muzzle on our faces wherever we go was never brought up before.
Why should we ask 99.7% of Americans or the world to accept medical tyranny just to make .26% of the population feel safe? People who question the mandates are called “selfish”, but even if I was one of the people susceptible to the virus, I would NEVER demand that 99% of the population bow to totalitarianism at the off chance that I might live a little while longer. Now THAT would be selfish.
As more and more studies and data are released, the mask mandates are also coming into question. Though Big Tech has sought to suppress or censor studies that run contrary to the mainstream narrative, this has only led more people to question the motivations of governments pushing the mandates. After all, the mainstream media keeps saying that we should “listen to the science”, but they ignore or censor the science. So, if the pandemic response is not based in science, then it must only be about control.
Many Americans are not as stupid as the elites think. They see the inconsistencies in the rhetoric and the data and they are increasingly prone to refuse to comply. This might be why the establishment is suddenly rushing out at least two Covid vaccines in the span of half a year; they have to get the vaccine phase of the Reset underway before too many people jump from the panic bandwagon.
The vaccine rush and the claims of effectiveness of 94% to 95% from Pfizer and Moderna are suspect. The average effectiveness of most vaccines is around 50% or less, and these are vaccines with hundreds of trials and years of usage. Somehow, Pfizer and Moderna were both able to produce a vaccine for a SARS type virus when multiple governments tried for over a decade to produce vaccines for SARS in China and were unsuccessful, and they were able to achieve 95% effectiveness?
Many people are not buying the vaccine story, and this is perhaps why the elites are jumping headlong into vaccination so fast. Consider this fact:
Numerous polls indicate that at least 1 in 3 Americans plan to refuse the Covid vaccine when it is released to the general public. 60% of Americans have stated in polls that they will not take the vaccine unless it is proven to be at least 75% effective.
Here I think we have our explanation for the vaccination bonanza. The elites know that a third of Americans (and probably Europeans) will not take the vaccine regardless of any propaganda they dish out. They also know that 60% of Americans are unlikely to take the vaccine unless they can show an effectiveness rate of at least 75%. Neither Moderna nor Pfizer have actually produced any evidence that their vaccines are capable of prevented severe illness or death from Covid, so, their effectiveness rate is based on “projections” of success according to their minimal trials. Meaning, the effectiveness rate of 95% is completely arbitrary.
Why did they go with such a high number instead of a more realistic 50% to 60%? Because the polls say they need an epic effectiveness rate in order to convince Americans to take the vaccine. I think it is really as simple as that.
Americans are skeptical of the vaccines for a number of reasons. The reality that they are minimally tested and rushed out in less than a year is one reason. The fact that the government and the media have been caught censoring or lying about Covid data is another reason. People just don’t trust the elites, and who can blame them? Who would trust a cabal of psychopaths to inject them with an unknown viral cocktail? Maybe their intentions are not so pure?
The public is right to be suspicious. A former Pfizer vice president, Dr. Michael Yeadon among other medical professionals have recently warned that the vaccines have not been adequately tested and that there is a risk of “indefinite infertility” for women who take the current Covid vaccine due to damaging autoimmune response. In other words, the vaccine could make many women barren and unable to have children.
Maybe this is what Bill Gates meant when he stated in his Ted Talk that “vaccines and reproductive services” could help contribute to a reduction of the Earth’s population of 10% to 15% as a means to “stop global warming.
Why would Bill Gates mention vaccines in the same breath as “reproductive services” in reference to population reduction? Aren’t vaccines supposed to help people live longer? Well, the Pfizer VP’s warning about the Covid vaccine is ringing bells for me. Maybe the Covid vaccine won’t make you sick, or kill you. Maybe you will live a long life free of coronavirus, but you’ll find out a few years after taking the vaccine that you won’t ever be able to have kids.
Watch the movie Children Of Men to get a sense of what the future might be like if the globalists get their way.
In the meantime, the elites are trying with everything they have to convince the public that they must abandon notions of civil liberties in the name of survival and “the greater good”. They are already talking about how things will never go back to normal, and the changes being made today will stay in place for many years to come.
Governments are in the media right now claiming the vaccines “will not be mandatory”. This is a lie. At the same time they are putting mandates in place to require you to prove you are vaccinated in order to go to public places and even to go to work. Basically, you take the vaccine or you die from poverty. This is not a choice.
But, I see millions of Americans standing in opposition to this agenda. I see sheriffs and police across the country refusing to enforce the agenda, even in hard-left states like California. I see protests in lockdown states like Michigan, California and New York. I see mass protests in Europe. I see the Reset scheme being exposed and the truth breaking into the mainstream. I see something rising to the surface, and I smell that gunpowder scent of rebellion, and I like it.
I’m not pessimistic about the future. I know a crash is coming. I know a fight is coming. But right now what I see is a fight that can and will be won by those that respect the principles of freedom. The globalists may have overplayed their hand.
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE.
With global tensions spiking, thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401(k) into an IRA backed by physical gold. Now, thanks to a little-known IRS Tax Law, you can too. Learn how with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group. It reveals how physical precious metals can protect your savings, and how to open a Gold IRA. Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold.
You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com
Image: Waking Times
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-12-11--New Study Reveals The Most Heavily Surveilled Cities on Earth

2021 is a big moment for CCTV : the world ’ s one-billionth surveillance camera is likely to be installed by the end of the year .
A single CCTV camera per every eight humans on Earth .
But of course , it doesn ’ t quite work like that .
Each camera doesn ’ t follow a set group of people around , creating a neatly edited portrait .
The cameras are ( mostly ) fixed in position , and some countries have many more cameras than others .
In China and the US , for example , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 4.6 people , respectively – way ahead of the curve .
But what if it is more pertinent to think of how cameras are distributed spatially ?
After all , more cameras across a city with a smaller footprint makes for greater coverage of everybody ’ s comings and goings .
The increasing levels of CCTV surveillance could have direct implication to people ’ s privacy , so Surfshark wanted to know which cities have the highest number of CCTV cameras per square kilometer .
We gathered the numbers , crunched them , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to illustrate just how pervasive surveillance cameras are in the 130 most populous international cities .
We gathered multiple sources to determine the number of CCTV cameras in the world ’ s 150 most populous cities .
The population of each city in this study was taken from WorldPopulationReview.com , and the area in km2 was gathered from Wikipedia .
With all data in hand , we were able to calculate the number of cameras per 1,000 people and per 1 km2 .
Crime data was sourced from Numbeo.com .
All data was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ full research behind this project , visit : http : //bit.ly/SurveillanceCities WORLD MAP : CCTV Density in Cities Around the World Surfshark is an award-winning , highly secure yet easy to use VPN that encrypts users ’ online data to help them stay private and protected every day , hassle-free .
Their mission is to humanize protection tools so that everyone can be in control of their privacy and security .
That ’ s why the app is intuitive to use and https : //surfshark.com/blog is packed with easy-to-understand resources , reports and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NeoMam Studios is a creative studio on a mission to create digital content that online audiences will want to share for months and years to come .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

2021 is a big moment for CCTV: the world’s one-billionth surveillance camera is likely to be installed by the end of the year. A single CCTV camera per every eight humans on Earth.
But of course, it doesn’t quite work like that. Each camera doesn’t follow a set group of people around, creating a neatly edited portrait. The cameras are (mostly) fixed in position, and some countries have many more cameras than others.
In China and the US, for example, there is already one camera per 4.1 and 4.6 people, respectively – way ahead of the curve. But what if it is more pertinent to think of how cameras are distributed spatially? After all, more cameras across a city with a smaller footprint makes for greater coverage of everybody’s comings and goings.
The increasing levels of CCTV surveillance could have direct implication to people’s privacy, so Surfshark wanted to know which cities have the highest number of CCTV cameras per square kilometer. We gathered the numbers, crunched them, and produced a series of new visualizations to illustrate just how pervasive surveillance cameras are in the 130 most populous international cities.
Credit: Surfshark. Original source of study: https://surfshark.com/surveillance-cities
Methodology & Sources
We gathered multiple sources to determine the number of CCTV cameras in the world’s 150 most populous cities. The population of each city in this study was taken from WorldPopulationReview.com, and the area in km2 was gathered from Wikipedia. With all data in hand, we were able to calculate the number of cameras per 1,000 people and per 1 km2. Crime data was sourced from Numbeo.com.
All data was gathered in November 2020.
For the full research behind this project, visit: http://bit.ly/SurveillanceCities
WORLD MAP: CCTV Density in Cities Around the World
City vs. City Comparison Tool
FULL DATA TABLE
Top 10 Cities for CCTV Density Infographic [High-Res]
About Surfshark
Surfshark is an award-winning, highly secure yet easy to use VPN that encrypts users’ online data to help them stay private and protected every day, hassle-free.
Their mission is to humanize protection tools so that everyone can be in control of their privacy and security. That’s why the app is intuitive to use and https://surfshark.com/blog is packed with easy-to-understand resources, reports and how-to guides on security and privacy.
About NeoMam Studios
NeoMam Studios is a creative studio on a mission to create digital content that online audiences will want to share for months and years to come.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.