activistpost--2020-11-13--Virginia Court Rules License Plate Tracking Doesn’t Violate Privacy

The Virginia Supreme Court has ruled that a police department ’ s use of automatic license plate readers ( ALPRs ) does not violate state privacy laws .
In effect , the ruling will allow law enforcement agencies in Virginia to indefinitely keep data from automated license plate readers , including a record of the time and place where the system photographed the vehicle .
A lower court ruling barred the Fairfax Police Department from using ALPRs , but the state ’ s high court reasoned that since the system does not include personal information such as phone numbers or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ privacy laws .
The court acknowledged that police can cross-reference information gathered by ALPRs with other databases to obtain such personal information , but since it isn ’ t part of the ALPR data , the license plate scanning system isn ’ t illegal .
The decision ends a five-year legal battle waged by the ACLU to force Virginia police departments to purge ALPR data from their systems .
According to the Washington Post , Fairfax County police keep ALPR data for up to a year .
Other agencies store the information for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there is nothing to stop law enforcement agencies in Virginia from establishing permanent databases of ALPR information .
Police generally configure ALPRs to store the photograph , the license plate number , and the date , time , and location of a vehicle ’ s license plate , which is bad enough .
But according to records obtained by the ACLU via a Freedom of Information Act request , these systems also capture photographs of drivers and their passengers .
Virginia twice failed to put meaningful limits on the use of ALPR systems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ McAuliffe ( D ) vetoed a bill that would have prohibited the retention of data collected by ALPRs for more than seven days and ban that data from “ outside inquiries or internal usage , except in the investigation of a crime or missing persons report.
” In 2017 , the Republican-controlled House of Delegates rejected a bill that would have put a 60-day limit on the retention of ALPR data .
Despite the court ruling , the legislature can still place limits on the use of ALPRs and restrict data storage and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and sharing of ALPR data , local and state ALPR information also ends up in federal databases .
As reported in the Wall Street Journal , the federal government , via the Drug Enforcement Agency ( DEA ) , tracks the location of millions of vehicles through data provided by ALPRs operated on a state and local level .
They ’ ve engaged in this for nearly a decade , all without a warrant , or even public notice of the policy .
State and local law enforcement agencies operate most of these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grant money .
The DEA then taps into the local database to track the whereabouts of millions of people – for the “ crime ” of driving – without having to operate a huge network itself .
ALPRs can scan , capture and record thousands of license plates every minute and store them in massive databases , along with date , time and location information .
Records obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation ( EFF ) through open records requests encompassed information compiled by 200 law enforcement agencies that utilize ALPRs .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plate scans in just two years ( 2016 and 2017 ) .
Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Perhaps more concerning , this gigantic sample of license plate scans reveals that 99.5 percent of this data was collected regardless of whether the vehicle or its owner were suspected of being involved in criminal activity .
On average , agencies share this data with a minimum of 160 other agencies .
In some cases , agencies share this data with as many as 800 other agencies .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ facial-recognition program in the fall of 2014 , and the federal government building a giant biometric database with pictures provided by the states and corporate friends , the feds can potentially access stored photographs of drivers and passengers , along with detailed data revealing their location and activities .
With this kind of information , government agents can easily find individuals without warrants or oversight , for any reason whatsoever .
Since a majority of federal license plate tracking data comes from state and local law enforcement , laws banning or even restricting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states pass such laws , the end result becomes more clear .
No data equals no federal license plate tracking program .
This is why it ’ s imperative for states to limit the use of ALPR systems , and restrict ALPR data storage and sharing .
Limiting ALPRs at the state level takes a good first step toward putting a big dent in federal plans to continue location tracking and expanding its facial recognition program .
The less data that states make available to the federal government , the less ability it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elsewhere .
Michael Maharrey [ send him email ] is the Communications Director for the Tenth Amendment Center .
He is from the original home of the Principles of ’ 98 – Kentucky and currently resides in northern Florida .
See his blog archive here and his article archive here .
He is the author of the book , Our Last Hope : Rediscovering the Lost Path to Liberty .
You can visit his personal website at MichaelMaharrey.com and like him on Facebook HERE Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Michael Maharrey
The Virginia Supreme Court has ruled that a police department’s use of automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) does not violate state privacy laws.
In effect, the ruling will allow law enforcement agencies in Virginia to indefinitely keep data from automated license plate readers, including a record of the time and place where the system photographed the vehicle.
A lower court ruling barred the Fairfax Police Department from using ALPRs, but the state’s high court reasoned that since the system does not include personal information such as phone numbers or addresses, it does not violate state privacy laws. The court acknowledged that police can cross-reference information gathered by ALPRs with other databases to obtain such personal information, but since it isn’t part of the ALPR data, the license plate scanning system isn’t illegal.
The decision ends a five-year legal battle waged by the ACLU to force Virginia police departments to purge ALPR data from their systems. According to the Washington Post, Fairfax County police keep ALPR data for up to a year. Other agencies store the information for as long as 2 years. But there is nothing to stop law enforcement agencies in Virginia from establishing permanent databases of ALPR information.
Police generally configure ALPRs to store the photograph, the license plate number, and the date, time, and location of a vehicle’s license plate, which is bad enough. But according to records obtained by the ACLU via a Freedom of Information Act request, these systems also capture photographs of drivers and their passengers.
Virginia twice failed to put meaningful limits on the use of ALPR systems. In 2015, Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) vetoed a bill that would have prohibited the retention of data collected by ALPRs for more than seven days and ban that data from “outside inquiries or internal usage, except in the investigation of a crime or missing persons report.” In 2017, the Republican-controlled House of Delegates rejected a bill that would have put a 60-day limit on the retention of ALPR data.
Despite the court ruling, the legislature can still place limits on the use of ALPRs and restrict data storage and data sharing.
Without limits on storage and sharing of ALPR data, local and state ALPR information also ends up in federal databases.
IMPACT ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS
As reported in the Wall Street Journal, the federal government, via the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), tracks the location of millions of vehicles through data provided by ALPRs operated on a state and local level. They’ve engaged in this for nearly a decade, all without a warrant, or even public notice of the policy.
State and local law enforcement agencies operate most of these tracking systems, paid for by federal grant money. The DEA then taps into the local database to track the whereabouts of millions of people – for the “crime” of driving – without having to operate a huge network itself.
ALPRs can scan, capture and record thousands of license plates every minute and store them in massive databases, along with date, time and location information.
Records obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) through open records requests encompassed information compiled by 200 law enforcement agencies that utilize ALPRs. The data revealed more than 2.5 billion license plate scans in just two years (2016 and 2017).
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
Perhaps more concerning, this gigantic sample of license plate scans reveals that 99.5 percent of this data was collected regardless of whether the vehicle or its owner were suspected of being involved in criminal activity. On average, agencies share this data with a minimum of 160 other agencies. In some cases, agencies share this data with as many as 800 other agencies.
With the FBI rolling out a nationwide facial-recognition program in the fall of 2014, and the federal government building a giant biometric database with pictures provided by the states and corporate friends, the feds can potentially access stored photographs of drivers and passengers, along with detailed data revealing their location and activities. With this kind of information, government agents can easily find individuals without warrants or oversight, for any reason whatsoever.
Since a majority of federal license plate tracking data comes from state and local law enforcement, laws banning or even restricting ALPR use are essential. As more states pass such laws, the end result becomes more clear. No data equals no federal license plate tracking program.
This is why it’s imperative for states to limit the use of ALPR systems, and restrict ALPR data storage and sharing. Limiting ALPRs at the state level takes a good first step toward putting a big dent in federal plans to continue location tracking and expanding its facial recognition program. The less data that states make available to the federal government, the less ability it has to track people in Virginia and elsewhere.
Source: Tenth Amendment Center
Michael Maharrey [send him email] is the Communications Director for the Tenth Amendment Center. He is from the original home of the Principles of ’98 – Kentucky and currently resides in northern Florida. See his blog archive here and his article archive here. He is the author of the book, Our Last Hope: Rediscovering the Lost Path to Liberty. You can visit his personal website at MichaelMaharrey.com and like him on Facebook HERE
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-11-13--Legislators Concerned about DoD Wanting to Own 5G Network

American opposition to 5G continues to increase for a variety of reasons ( see 1 , 2 ) in addition to biological and environmental risks ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) .
In fact , federal agencies and credible experts warn 5G will threaten jobs , national security , public safety , and weather forecasting accuracy ( see 1 , 2 ) .
Deployment has been banned , delayed , and stopped worldwide due to serious health and safety risks .
Nevertheless , in August , Trump reintroduced his proposal to have a national 5G plan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) seems to want to be in charge with Google assisting them .
Some organizations aren ’ t happy about this because this violates free market principles .
Apparently , some legislators aren ’ t happy about this either .
The Pentagon will also be releasing guidance on securing the microelectronics supply chain , according to Defense Undersecretary for Acquisition and Sustainment Ellen Lord .
The Pentagon is pushing ahead on a variety of 5G projects with more proposal requests on the way despite concerns over what role the Defense Department should have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Defense Undersecretary for Acquisition and Sustainment Ellen Lord said Tuesday the DOD will issue two 5G broad agency announcements in early 2021 .
The first BAA will be for 5G security prototyping and experimentation , and the second will be “ for more fundamental research and development into beyond 5G technologies , ” Lord said at a MITRE Corporation event launching a new 5G consortium .
Lord ’ s pre-recorded remarks come after some of the Pentagon ’ s requests for information on 5G have raised eyebrows among lawmakers , Nextgov reported last @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Thune , R-S.D.
, and Democrats including Reps. Frank Pallone , D-N.J. , and Rep. Mike Doyle , D-Pa. , objected to language in one solicitation suggesting DOD is considering owning and operating its own 5G network .
On Tuesday , Lord painted the Pentagon as more of a champion of industry 5G efforts than a usurper , particularly as it pertains to setting security standards for the technology .
She also enumerated some military technology applications she sees as dependent on 5G , including drones and autonomous vehicles .
5G is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ facilitating movement of data across a complex web of sensors and systems , Lord said .
High-speed internet CAN be achieved without 5G AND Americans have actually already paid for it .
However , according to Verizon and now the DoD – the push for 5G seems to be more about other stuff that many experts say isn ’ t safe – like Autonomous Vehicles ( AVs ) ( see 1 , 2 ) and Artificial Intelligence ( AI ) .
Not only that – the DoD now seems to want to control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , telecom executives gave U.S. congressional testimony that they had NO independent scientific evidence that 5G was safe .
Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses where 5G has been installed ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) .
Of course , other sources of wireless emit harmful radiation too .
Last year , the World Health Organization cautioned that high levels of Electromagnetic Radiation exposure ( aka “ Electrosmog ” ) could lead to health issues in a significant portion of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can cause base stations to overheat AND requires 2-3X more energy to operate than 4G .
None of that will make America great .
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology .
For more information , visit our archives and the following websites : Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
American opposition to 5G continues to increase for a variety of reasons (see 1, 2) in addition to biological and environmental risks (see 1, 2, 3, 4). In fact, federal agencies and credible experts warn 5G will threaten jobs, national security, public safety, and weather forecasting accuracy (see 1, 2).
Deployment has been banned, delayed, and stopped worldwide due to serious health and safety risks. Nevertheless, in August, Trump reintroduced his proposal to have a national 5G plan and the Department of Defense (DoD) seems to want to be in charge with Google assisting them. Some organizations aren’t happy about this because this violates free market principles. Apparently, some legislators aren’t happy about this either.
From Nextgov:
Pentagon Expanding 5G Efforts, DOD Official Says The Pentagon will also be releasing guidance on securing the microelectronics supply chain, according to Defense Undersecretary for Acquisition and Sustainment Ellen Lord. The Pentagon is pushing ahead on a variety of 5G projects with more proposal requests on the way despite concerns over what role the Defense Department should have in building and controlling 5G networks. Defense Undersecretary for Acquisition and Sustainment Ellen Lord said Tuesday the DOD will issue two 5G broad agency announcements in early 2021. The first BAA will be for 5G security prototyping and experimentation, and the second will be “for more fundamental research and development into beyond 5G technologies,” Lord said at a MITRE Corporation event launching a new 5G consortium. Lord’s pre-recorded remarks come after some of the Pentagon’s requests for information on 5G have raised eyebrows among lawmakers, Nextgov reported last month. GOP lawmakers including Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., and Democrats including Reps. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., and Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Pa., objected to language in one solicitation suggesting DOD is considering owning and operating its own 5G network. On Tuesday, Lord painted the Pentagon as more of a champion of industry 5G efforts than a usurper, particularly as it pertains to setting security standards for the technology. She also enumerated some military technology applications she sees as dependent on 5G, including drones and autonomous vehicles. 5G is a technology that will transform military operations by facilitating movement of data across a complex web of sensors and systems, Lord said. Read full article
High-speed internet CAN be achieved without 5G AND Americans have actually already paid for it. However, according to Verizon and now the DoD – the push for 5G seems to be more about other stuff that many experts say isn’t safe – like Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) (see 1, 2) and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Not only that – the DoD now seems to want to control the whole Electromagnetic Spectrum.
In 2019, telecom executives gave U.S. congressional testimony that they had NO independent scientific evidence that 5G was safe. Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses where 5G has been installed (see 1, 2, 3, 4).
Of course, other sources of wireless emit harmful radiation too. Last year, the World Health Organization cautioned that high levels of Electromagnetic Radiation exposure (aka “Electrosmog”) could lead to health issues in a significant portion of the population.
Other 5G warnings include that can cause base stations to overheat AND requires 2-3X more energy to operate than 4G. None of that will make America great.
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information, visit our archives and the following websites:
Image: Anthony Freda Art
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-11-13--Greece Will Require People to Text Government for Permission to Leave Home Under New Lockdown

Greece ’ s General Secretariat for Telecommunications and Posts has set up a 5-digit hotline for citizens to text if they want to obtain permission to leave their homes while the new restrictions are in place for the next 3 weeks .
People must text their name , address and 1 of only 6 reasons to the 13033 number if they intend to do any of these 6 government permissible activities : • Visit to a pharmacy or visit to a doctor if necessary • Visit to a supermarket or stores for essential supplies • Visit to a bank if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to people needing assistance or escorting children to and from school • Attending a funeral , as per the conditions provided by the law , or visiting children in case of divorced parents • Physical exercise outdoors or up to two persons taking their pet for a walk while always observing a 1.5-metre distance .
If an individual is unable to ask for permission through a SMS text , they will be required to carry a document provided by their employer detailing their shift schedule or another type of government issued document for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ top of that , citizens must carry a valid identification card or document with them .
During Greece ’ s first nationwide lockdown in the spring , the same text for permission measure was put into place under which residents sent a total of 110 million messages to the hotline in 42 days of de facto house arrest .
The number served 1,818 messages per minute , while during the highest traffic it processed 7,500 messages per minute , according to government numbers .
The government of Greece will roll out its latest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a nationwide curfew from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m the next day in an attempt to keep people inside their homes for a three week span .
Like measures taken in other European countries , retail stores will close with the exception of supermarkets while most schools will remain open .
On Thursday , Greece recorded 2,751 cases and 43 deaths from COVID-19 .

Greece’s General Secretariat for Telecommunications and Posts has set up a 5-digit hotline for citizens to text if they want to obtain permission to leave their homes while the new restrictions are in place for the next 3 weeks.
People must text their name, address and 1 of only 6 reasons to the 13033 number if they intend to do any of these 6 government permissible activities:
Visit to a pharmacy or visit to a doctor if necessary Visit to a supermarket or stores for essential supplies Visit to a bank if e-banking transactions are not possible Visit to people needing assistance or escorting children to and from school Attending a funeral, as per the conditions provided by the law, or visiting children in case of divorced parents Physical exercise outdoors or up to two persons taking their pet for a walk while always observing a 1.5-metre distance.
If an individual is unable to ask for permission through a SMS text, they will be required to carry a document provided by their employer detailing their shift schedule or another type of government issued document for trips not related to work. On top of that, citizens must carry a valid identification card or document with them.
During Greece’s first nationwide lockdown in the spring, the same text for permission measure was put into place under which residents sent a total of 110 million messages to the hotline in 42 days of de facto house arrest. The number served 1,818 messages per minute, while during the highest traffic it processed 7,500 messages per minute, according to government numbers.
The government of Greece will roll out its latest lockdown on Friday night, starting with a nationwide curfew from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m the next day in an attempt to keep people inside their homes for a three week span.
Like measures taken in other European countries, retail stores will close with the exception of supermarkets while most schools will remain open.
On Thursday, Greece recorded 2,751 cases and 43 deaths from COVID-19.


activistpost--2020-11-13--DOJ Rules No Charges For Prosecutor That Gave Epstein “Sweetheart Deal”

Former Labor Secretary Alex Acosta was one of the powerful figures who helped Epstein avoid serious jail time from behind the scenes in the 2007 case where he opted to register as a sex offender to avoid serious jail time .
One of the strategies that Epstein used to stay above the law was befriending , paying off , and potentially blackmailing police , prosecutors , and judges .
Acosta was one of the influential prosecutors that he befriended , and many advocates for the victims believe that Epstein was given special treatment throughout his initial trial because of his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ officials .
Acosta was forced to resign from his position as Secretary of Labor amid the renewed controversy after Epstein ’ s death last year , but he never faced any charges for his preferential treatment of the notorious pedophile .
Acosta was recently a target of an internal Justice Department investigation , and they determined that he “ exercised poor judgment ” but still ruled that he had not broken the law or engaged in professional misconduct .
The decision to not prosecute Acosta was handed down despite investigators admitting that he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ significant investigative steps were completed.
” According to CNBC , a statement on Thursday by The Justice Department said , “ While OPR did not find that Department attorneys engaged in professional misconduct , OPR concluded that the victims were not treated with the forthrightness and sensitivity expected by the Department .
OPR also concluded that former U.S. Attorney Acosta exercised poor judgment by deciding to resolve the federal investigation through the non-prosecution agreement and when he failed to make certain that the state of Florida intended to and would notify victims identified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plea hearing.
” The DOJ ’ s decision was widely criticized by victim advocates and some US officials .
Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska , chairman of the Senate Judiciary Oversight Subcommittee , said that Americans should be outraged by the ruling .
“ Letting a well-connected billionaire get away with child rape and international sex trafficking isn ’ t ‘ poor judgment ’ — it is a disgusting failure .
Americans ought to be enraged .
Jeffrey Epstein should be rotting behind bars today , but the Justice Department failed Epstein ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sasse said in a statement responding to the recent ruling .
Sasse was the Senator who initially requested the DOJ investigation , so he is especially dismayed to see it end without any charges .
In Acosta ’ s controversial plea deal with Epstein in 2007 , he significantly reduced the charges against Epstein by legally classifying the underage girls as voluntary sex-workers .
Sasse said that the Justice Department ’ s “ crooked deal with Epstein effectively shut down investigations into his child sex trafficking ring and protected his co-conspirators in other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ federal law to keep information from the victims and protect Epstein from future prosecutions .
According to prosecutors , Epstein operated a “ vast network ” for child human trafficking between 2002 and 2005 , which allowed him to “ sexually exploit and abuse dozens of underage girls.
” Many long-time friends like Bill Clinton , Donald Trump and Prince Andrew have been implicated in Epstein ’ s illicit activities .

By John Vibes
Former Labor Secretary Alex Acosta was one of the powerful figures who helped Epstein avoid serious jail time from behind the scenes in the 2007 case where he opted to register as a sex offender to avoid serious jail time.
One of the strategies that Epstein used to stay above the law was befriending, paying off, and potentially blackmailing police, prosecutors, and judges. Acosta was one of the influential prosecutors that he befriended, and many advocates for the victims believe that Epstein was given special treatment throughout his initial trial because of his relationship with Acosta and other law enforcement officials.
Acosta was forced to resign from his position as Secretary of Labor amid the renewed controversy after Epstein’s death last year, but he never faced any charges for his preferential treatment of the notorious pedophile.
Acosta was recently a target of an internal Justice Department investigation, and they determined that he “exercised poor judgment” but still ruled that he had not broken the law or engaged in professional misconduct. The decision to not prosecute Acosta was handed down despite investigators admitting that he closed Epstein’s case “before significant investigative steps were completed.”
Nearly a year of emails in Alex Acosta’s email inbox while he oversaw the case against Jeffrey Epstein are missing, the Justice Department revealed. Feds attributed the gap from May 26, 2007 to April 2, 2008 to a “technical glitch," two sources say.https://t.co/l8qiPwJWTr — New York Daily News (@NYDailyNews) November 13, 2020
According to CNBC, a statement on Thursday by The Justice Department said, “While OPR did not find that Department attorneys engaged in professional misconduct, OPR concluded that the victims were not treated with the forthrightness and sensitivity expected by the Department. OPR also concluded that former U.S. Attorney Acosta exercised poor judgment by deciding to resolve the federal investigation through the non-prosecution agreement and when he failed to make certain that the state of Florida intended to and would notify victims identified through the federal investigation about the state plea hearing.”
The DOJ’s decision was widely criticized by victim advocates and some US officials. Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Oversight Subcommittee, said that Americans should be outraged by the ruling.
“Letting a well-connected billionaire get away with child rape and international sex trafficking isn’t ‘poor judgment’ — it is a disgusting failure. Americans ought to be enraged. Jeffrey Epstein should be rotting behind bars today, but the Justice Department failed Epstein’s victims at every turn,” Sasse said in a statement responding to the recent ruling.
Sasse was the Senator who initially requested the DOJ investigation, so he is especially dismayed to see it end without any charges.
In Acosta’s controversial plea deal with Epstein in 2007, he significantly reduced the charges against Epstein by legally classifying the underage girls as voluntary sex-workers.
Sasse said that the Justice Department’s “crooked deal with Epstein effectively shut down investigations into his child sex trafficking ring and protected his co-conspirators in other states.”
The agreement also went against federal law to keep information from the victims and protect Epstein from future prosecutions.
some pretty damning stuff about ex-labor secretary Alex Acosta's conduct as a prosecutor—including that he didn't treat victims with dignity," in relation to some horrific sexual crimes involving minors. it's (almost) a little jarring next to the language exonerating him. pic.twitter.com/RlGq0bmIi1 — Hassan Ali (@hassankanu) November 12, 2020
According to prosecutors, Epstein operated a “vast network” for child human trafficking between 2002 and 2005, which allowed him to “sexually exploit and abuse dozens of underage girls.” Many long-time friends like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and Prince Andrew have been implicated in Epstein’s illicit activities.
Source: Anewspost.com


activistpost--2020-11-13--Utility Regulators Ignoring “Conflict of Interest” Again in Massachusetts and Other States As Well

The audit would investigate the company ’ s strategic planning and suspected management problems “ to the highest levels of the organization.
” FTI Consulting ’ s John Cochrane previously had a long and high-level career with National Grid USA .
He was chief financial officer and treasurer , in charge of finance and mergers , and later headed global business development , overseeing $ 27 billion in acquisitions , according to his biography in the proposal .
He left in 2013 and now leads a Power & Utilities practice for FTI in Boston .
His FTI colleague , Colin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manager until 2015 .
The AG ’ s office stated its position plainly in a May 12 letter to state regulators : “ FTI should be removed from consideration in order to eliminate any question of bias or the appearance of a conflict of interest.
” The letter also said that neither National Grid nor FTI were upfront about their prior relationship .
Cochrane , in a written response to the DPU on the issues raised by the AG ’ s office , denied there was a conflict of interest , saying neither @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Grid in over five years .
“ There is no relationship with the current management of National Grid that exists to interfere with the process that we would undertake to conduct the management audit , ” Cochrane wrote on behalf of FTI in the May 17 response .
However , WBUR found at least 12 current senior management employees who worked at National Grid when the two men did .
Both Cochrane and Hassett declined to comment .
Cochrane has additional ties to National Grid .
For instance , he serves on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. subsidiary of a Canadian energy company , according to proposal documents .
National Grid has a contract to buy gas from Emera through 2024 , according to records filed with the New York Department of Public Services .
Cochrane disclosed to Massachusetts DPU that since leaving National Grid , he has worked on a regulatory report for the company in New York and also provided it free consulting .
FTI declined to comment for this story , saying the firm does not discuss clients .
( On Thursday , a front page @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new revelations about the extent of FTI ’ s influence campaigns on behalf of the fossil fuel industry . )
National Grid executives also declined to be interviewed .
Spokesman Robert Kievra , in a statement , said , “ The company does not believe the selection of FTI presents a credible conflict of interest and their proposal was reviewed as part of the regulatory process and approved.
” The DPU declined to comment on Cochrane ’ s Emera relationship , and said in a statement , “ FTI Consulting addressed any potential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issued to the department.
” Regulators in New York took a different view on Cochrane in 2016 .
He was an FTI consultant on a bid for a management audit at Long Island Power Authority and PSEG , Long Island — which had had operating agreements with National Grid until the end of 2013 .
The audit was to involve areas that were part of Cochrane ’ s purview at National Grid .
Regulators refused to consider the proposal unless Cochrane was replaced .
New York regulators said Long Island Power used a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Massachusetts ’ utility regulator would not say if it has any such rule on how long a person must be gone from a company to avoid a conflict of interest .

The audit would investigate the company’s strategic planning and suspected management problems “to the highest levels of the organization.”
FTI Consulting’s John Cochrane previously had a long and high-level career with National Grid USA. He was chief financial officer and treasurer, in charge of finance and mergers, and later headed global business development, overseeing $27 billion in acquisitions, according to his biography in the proposal. He left in 2013 and now leads a Power & Utilities practice for FTI in Boston. His FTI colleague, Colin Hassett, was a National Grid project manager until 2015.
The AG’s office stated its position plainly in a May 12 letter to state regulators: “FTI should be removed from consideration in order to eliminate any question of bias or the appearance of a conflict of interest.” The letter also said that neither National Grid nor FTI were upfront about their prior relationship.
Cochrane, in a written response to the DPU on the issues raised by the AG’s office, denied there was a conflict of interest, saying neither he nor Hassett had worked for National Grid in over five years.
“There is no relationship with the current management of National Grid that exists to interfere with the process that we would undertake to conduct the management audit,” Cochrane wrote on behalf of FTI in the May 17 response.
However, WBUR found at least 12 current senior management employees who worked at National Grid when the two men did. Both Cochrane and Hassett declined to comment.
Cochrane has additional ties to National Grid. For instance, he serves on the board of Emera Energy Services, the U.S. subsidiary of a Canadian energy company, according to proposal documents. National Grid has a contract to buy gas from Emera through 2024, according to records filed with the New York Department of Public Services.
Cochrane disclosed to Massachusetts DPU that since leaving National Grid, he has worked on a regulatory report for the company in New York and also provided it free consulting.
FTI declined to comment for this story, saying the firm does not discuss clients. (On Thursday, a front page story in The New York Times detailed new revelations about the extent of FTI’s influence campaigns on behalf of the fossil fuel industry.)
National Grid executives also declined to be interviewed. Spokesman Robert Kievra, in a statement, said, “The company does not believe the selection of FTI presents a credible conflict of interest and their proposal was reviewed as part of the regulatory process and approved.”
The DPU declined to comment on Cochrane’s Emera relationship, and said in a statement, “FTI Consulting addressed any potential conflict of interest in a written response issued to the department.”
Regulators in New York took a different view on Cochrane in 2016. He was an FTI consultant on a bid for a management audit at Long Island Power Authority and PSEG, Long Island — which had had operating agreements with National Grid until the end of 2013. The audit was to involve areas that were part of Cochrane’s purview at National Grid. Regulators refused to consider the proposal unless Cochrane was replaced.
New York regulators said Long Island Power used a five-year guideline in determining conflicts of interest. Massachusetts’ utility regulator would not say if it has any such rule on how long a person must be gone from a company to avoid a conflict of interest.


activistpost--2020-11-13--“Down From London” Crowd Flee Cities, Send British Country Estate Sales Soaring

Following trends in New York City , San Francisco , Los Angeles , and Chicago , wealthy so-called ‘ Down-from-London ’ ers have reassessed their living situation in urban areas and moved to the countryside due to the virus pandemic .
Bloomberg reports Londoners who generally have a large house in the London metro area and a cottage in the suburbs have flipped tradition upside down , with their principal residence now in the country , opting for a smaller flat in the city .
They also said , “ the global rich triggered a 1,900 % sales surge for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Holborow , country director of Savills ’ s Private Office , said exits to the countryside are due in part to strict virus lockdowns .
He said a “ staggering ” 19 country estates ( with values over £15 million ) in the UK have sold or are under contract in 2020 , as the previous year only five sold .
Holborow said the countryside marketplace for estates was in a “ rut ” for years – adding that the virus pandemic , with the flood of people exiting metro areas , brought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recent real estate report via Knight Frank showed UK country houses in the £2 million to £10 million range saw sluggish growth over the years .
By the end of 3Q19 , the market for these homes had seen five consecutive quarters of price declines – with country house prices about 20 % below their 2008 peak .
According to a separate Knight Frank report , between May 13 to June 24 , the number of accepted offers for country houses with values between £5 million and £10 million jumped 182 % higher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these homes soared 64 % higher than the same five-year average .
Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
Edward Rook , head of the country department at Knight Frank , said country homes , once considered secondary homes for the wealthy , are becoming primary homes , and buyers are pouring in .
He said that during summer lockdown , “ it was quite a sobering feeling , where you ’ re sitting in your lateral flat , in air conditioning , and you ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sunshine on Instagram.
” A revival of rural real markets is underway on both sides of the Atlantic .
With lockdowns present in the UK and the US metros reimposing stricter social distancing measures to mitigate virus spreading , another round of wealthy city dwellers could be preparing to head for a new life in rural communities as they have the ability to remote work .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Tyler Durden
Following trends in New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Chicago, wealthy so-called ‘Down-from-London’ers have reassessed their living situation in urban areas and moved to the countryside due to the virus pandemic.
Bloomberg reports Londoners who generally have a large house in the London metro area and a cottage in the suburbs have flipped tradition upside down, with their principal residence now in the country, opting for a smaller flat in the city. They also said, “the global rich triggered a 1,900% sales surge for UK country estates this year.”
Crispin Holborow, country director of Savills’s Private Office, said exits to the countryside are due in part to strict virus lockdowns. He said a “staggering” 19 country estates (with values over £15 million) in the UK have sold or are under contract in 2020, as the previous year only five sold.
Holborow said the countryside marketplace for estates was in a “rut” for years – adding that the virus pandemic, with the flood of people exiting metro areas, brought new life to rural communities.
A recent real estate report via Knight Frank showed UK country houses in the £2 million to £10 million range saw sluggish growth over the years. By the end of 3Q19, the market for these homes had seen five consecutive quarters of price declines – with country house prices about 20% below their 2008 peak.
According to a separate Knight Frank report, between May 13 to June 24, the number of accepted offers for country houses with values between £5 million and £10 million jumped 182% higher than the five-year average. Prices for these homes soared 64% higher than the same five-year average.
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
Edward Rook, head of the country department at Knight Frank, said country homes, once considered secondary homes for the wealthy, are becoming primary homes, and buyers are pouring in.
“A lot of people are making [country houses] their primary home. Instead of having a large house in London and maybe a cottage in the country, they’re reversing that and having a smaller apartment in London and a principal residence in the country,” Rook said.
He said that during summer lockdown, “it was quite a sobering feeling, where you’re sitting in your lateral flat, in air conditioning, and you’re looking at your friends sitting in glorious sunshine on Instagram.”
“These are normally people who would jump on their plane and go,” he said, adding that lockdowns and closed borders limited mobility, and many of these wealthy folks would instead get stuck at their estate on the country as opposed to flat in the metro.
A revival of rural real markets is underway on both sides of the Atlantic. With lockdowns present in the UK and the US metros reimposing stricter social distancing measures to mitigate virus spreading, another round of wealthy city dwellers could be preparing to head for a new life in rural communities as they have the ability to remote work.
Source: Zero Hedge
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-11-13--IEEE Magazine:  “The fact that a high-frequency EMF cannot penetrate deep into human skin does not m

IEEE Magazine:  “The fact that a high-frequency EMF cannot penetrate deep into human skin does not mean that it is not dangerous.”

High-speed internet is achievable , safer and more secure with a wired internet connection ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) NOT 5G or WiFi .
Research has already determined that 5G is biologically harmful .
Cities worldwide AND entire countries have taken action to ban , delay , halt , and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums .
Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses where 5G has been installed ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) .
Of course , other sources of wireless emit harmful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ World Health Organization cautioned that high levels of Electromagnetic Radiation exposure ( aka “ Electrosmog ” ) could lead to health issues in a significant portion of the population .
In 2019 , telecom experts gave U.S. congressional testimony that they have NO independent scientific evidence that 5G is safe .
The majority of scientists worldwide oppose 5G until there are studies that say it is safe .
More research now indicates that exposure to 5G has undesirable consequences .
New Paper : 5G Radiation = Higher Absorption into Human Skin Human Electromagnetic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by S. Kim and I. Nasim published in IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine Nov. 2020 A new paper published in IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine evaluated human exposure to radiofrequency for three wireless systems -5G , 4G , and 3.9G and found that 5G ’ s higher frequencies penetrate into the skin very intensely despite the fact that the depth of penetration is more shallow .
The authors state that “ the fact that a high-frequency EMF can not penetrate deep into human skin does not mean that it is not dangerous.
” “ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ depth , and hence , a shallower penetration occurring in 5G yields a higher absorption.
” “ The example shown in Figure 4 presents a measurement of SAR being introduced on human skin at the distance of 10 cm from a transmitter in an uplink .
It clearly shows a scenario where the current belief is not valid ; the fact that a high-frequency EMF can not penetrate deep into human skin does not mean that it is not dangerous .
Specifically , although the penetration is limited only at the skin surface @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heat map in Figure 4 ) can be higher within the concentrated area , which can cause subsequent health problems such as skin heating.
” “ In this article , the first case study has demonstrated how much EMF exposure is caused in a 5G system compared to 4G and 3.9G.
” “ This article is expected to ignite continued interest in overarching research on the design of future wireless systems that achieve high performance while keeping consumer safety guaranteed.
” The fifth-generation wireless ( 5G ) has already started showing its capability @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which makes itself considered to be a promising mobile technology .
However , concerns have been raised on adverse health impacts that human users can experience in a 5G system by being exposed to electromagnetic fields ( EMFs ) .
This article investigates the human EMF exposure in a 5G system and compares them with those measured in the previous-generation cellular systems .
It suggests a minimum separation distance between a transmitter and a human user for keeping the EMF exposure below the safety regulation level , which provides consumers with a general @ @ @ @ @ @ @ communications .
S. Kim and I. Nasim , “ Human Electromagnetic Field Exposure in 5G at 28 GHz , ” in IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine , vol .
9 , no .
6 , pp .
41-48 , 1 Nov. 2020 , doi : 10.1109/MCE.2019.2956223 .
Doctors and scientists have asked for 5G moratoriums on Earth and in space ( see 1 , 2 ) .
Opposition and warnings continue to increase about tens of thousands of satellites and similar vehicles being launched for blasting 5G and WiFi at Earth ( see 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ) , global surveillance , and other purposes .
Regardless the “ Race for 5G ” continues in the U.S. and where it hasn ’ t yet been banned .
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology .
For more information , visit our archives and the following websites : Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources @ @ @ @ @ @ @ freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By B.N. Frank
High-speed internet is achievable, safer and more secure with a wired internet connection (see 1, 2, 3) NOT 5G or WiFi. Research has already determined that 5G is biologically harmful. Cities worldwide AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums. Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses where 5G has been installed (see 1, 2, 3, 4).
Of course, other sources of wireless emit harmful radiation too. Last year, the World Health Organization cautioned that high levels of Electromagnetic Radiation exposure (aka “Electrosmog”) could lead to health issues in a significant portion of the population.
In 2019, telecom experts gave U.S. congressional testimony that they have NO independent scientific evidence that 5G is safe. The majority of scientists worldwide oppose 5G until there are studies that say it is safe. More research now indicates that exposure to 5G has undesirable consequences.
From Environmental Health Trust:
New Paper: 5G Radiation = Higher Absorption into Human Skin
Human Electromagnetic Field Exposure in 5G at 28 GHz
by S. Kim and I. Nasim
published in IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine Nov. 2020
A new paper published in IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine evaluated human exposure to radiofrequency for three wireless systems -5G, 4G, and 3.9G and found that 5G’s higher frequencies penetrate into the skin very intensely despite the fact that the depth of penetration is more shallow. The authors state that “the fact that a high-frequency EMF cannot penetrate deep into human skin does not mean that it is not dangerous.”
Excerpts:
“The SAR is inversely proportional to the penetration depth, and hence, a shallower penetration occurring in 5G yields a higher absorption.”
“The example shown in Figure 4 presents a measurement of SAR being introduced on human skin at the distance of 10 cm from a transmitter in an uplink. It clearly shows a scenario where the current belief is not valid; the fact that a high-frequency EMF cannot penetrate deep into human skin does not mean that it is not dangerous. Specifically, although the penetration is limited only at the skin surface, the SAR (illustrated as a heat map in Figure 4) can be higher within the concentrated area, which can cause subsequent health problems such as skin heating.”
“In this article, the first case study has demonstrated how much EMF exposure is caused in a 5G system compared to 4G and 3.9G.”
“This article is expected to ignite continued interest in overarching research on the design of future wireless systems that achieve high performance while keeping consumer safety guaranteed.”
Abstract:
The fifth-generation wireless (5G) has already started showing its capability to achieve extremely fast data transfer, which makes itself considered to be a promising mobile technology. However, concerns have been raised on adverse health impacts that human users can experience in a 5G system by being exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). This article investigates the human EMF exposure in a 5G system and compares them with those measured in the previous-generation cellular systems. It suggests a minimum separation distance between a transmitter and a human user for keeping the EMF exposure below the safety regulation level, which provides consumers with a general understanding on the safe use of 5G communications.
S. Kim and I. Nasim, “Human Electromagnetic Field Exposure in 5G at 28 GHz,” in IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 41-48, 1 Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1109/MCE.2019.2956223.
Doctors and scientists have asked for 5G moratoriums on Earth and in space (see 1, 2). Opposition and warnings continue to increase about tens of thousands of satellites and similar vehicles being launched for blasting 5G and WiFi at Earth (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17), global surveillance, and other purposes. Regardless the “Race for 5G” continues in the U.S. and where it hasn’t yet been banned.
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information, visit our archives and the following websites:
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-11-13--National Election Fraud: Evidence of National Chicanery During America’s 2020 Presidential Election

Editor ’ s Note : Activist Post does not endorse any candidate for president or any other political office .
This article is presented for informational purposes only and all opinions are the author ’ s alone .
Regardless of where one falls politically , the sanctity of the vote is a bedrock of a functioning representative democracy .
Voters have to believe their vote matters .
And that the vote is free , fair , and accurate .
The basic facts of the 2020 American Presidential election are concerning because mounting evidence indicates there ’ s been a concerted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the election from President Donald Trump to former Vice President Joe Biden in a number of key swing states with the help of notoriously corrupt Democratic Party machines in at least five American cities — Detroit , Milwaukee , Philadelphia , Pittsburg , and Atlanta .
Here are the basic facts of the case : On Election Night when America went to bed , President Trump had a commanding lead in virtually every swing state , as well as Virginia , which no one expected him to win .
However , when America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found that he ’ d lost these leads , largely on the basis of mail-in ballots found in the middle of the night and out from under the watchful eye of legal election monitors .
What ’ s more , these massive caches of votes – almost all of which were for former Vice President Biden – came via large dumps primarily from the five aforementioned cities in states predominantly run by Democratic governors .
When one looks at the statistical likelihood of the reported turnout , the numbers are so improbable they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one-party state like Saddam Hussein ’ s Iraq or North Korea .
What ’ s more , Biden ’ s victory does not square with the results of the Republican Party nationally : Republicans won 28 of 29 competitive House seats and Democrats were unable to flip a single state legislature .
Joe Biden secured a scant three of the so-called “ Bellwether Districts ” that almost always choose the winner , one of which was in Delaware .
Judicial Watch found 353 counties in 29 different states who had higher than 100 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tend to follow Florida in terms of swinging left or right .
This is particularly true in Michigan , which has voted in lockstep with Florida since 1968 .
Nearly three dozen states had counting machines connected to the Internet during the election , which is inherently insecure .
Joe Biden ’ s lead among mail-in ballots was massive in two states — Michigan and Pennsylvania — while it was in the single digits in most states .
Evidence of chicanery , irregularities , and outright manipulation have poured in from a variety @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Georgia , Wisconsin , North Carolina , Texas , New Jersey , Nevada , and Arizona .
This evidence could easily be dismissed as simply weird if one is being generous or naive .
While much of this took place at the state level , there are also irregularities that are occurring across state lines and these are worthy of consideration .
It ’ s not evidence per se , but there was a massive spike in the number of Google searches for “ election fraud punishment ” in swing states in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Below we explore the details and the data of what happened across the nation on Election Day , with flagrant and often sloppy irregularities occurring from coast to coast .
Elsewhere we explore similar efforts in the key swing states of Pennsylvania , Wisconsin , Michigan , and Georgia .
All of the posts in this series will be updated as more credible information is uncovered .
The media is trying to weave a narrative with ever-shifting goalposts .
They began by saying that not only did voter fraud not happen , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Now , they have shifted their story to saying that there is always minor fraud , but that it never really matters much .
The Heritage Foundation has identified 1,200 elections where voter fraud made the difference in recent decades , long after the era of Jim Crow when election theft was de rigueur .
Of these , fully 15 were thrown out specifically because of cheating by mail-in ballot .
Mail-in ballots are largely banned in Europe , where voter ID requirements are likewise the norm .
Florida has been recognized specifically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the controlled media is that illegal aliens and other non-citizens don ’ t vote .
This is patently untrue .
In fact , they vote at alarmingly high rates .
A 2019 study found that approximately 2.2 percent of respondents admitted to voting illegally , which implies a little under a million ballots cast by non-citizens every year .
The counterargument is that respondents are either lying or misunderstood the question , but this is simply not true — those who conducted the study verified their votes .
So we can see that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is common .
It is not negligible , it has determined elections in living memory .
With this as our backdrop , we will now investigate voter irregularities throughout the nation during the 2020 Presidential election .
Before going further , it is worth discussing what constitutes evidence for electoral fraud .
Well , the Carter Center has a set of standards that they use to determine whether or not there has been electoral fraud somewhere .
These are the standards used by globalists to determine whether or not elections they disapprove @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of them are present in the contested states : • Votes should be presented for independent review .
• Elections should be subject to recounts .
Additionally , the Carter Center states that it is the right of dissidents to challenge and question the results of an election that they believe to be fraudulent .
Harassing dissidents is considered evidence of chicanery in and of itself .
“ Effective redress ” is the term they use and it is considered by the Carter Center to be vital for establishing an election as legitimate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to recounts and audits should be a red flag in and of itself .
There are also mathematical anomalies that are worth looking into because , regardless of turnout and outcome , elections will follow certain patterns .
One of these is that , because of mail sorting , mail-in ballots will consistently show the same ratio of support for each candidate .
We did not see that , however — there is a significant spike in support for Biden and fall off in support for President Trump as Election Night dragged on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anomaly became massive around 4 a.m. , the same time that the massive ballot drops without supervision began .
The same phenomenon occurred in Pennsylvania , Michigan and Georgia , all four of these states with copious amounts of electoral chicanery and irregularity .
Virginia was another state with similar mathematical irregularities .
Benford ’ s Law is another area where we see mathematical irregularities .
Put simply : When we have large datasets of numbers , there is a pattern we can find with regard to the final and penultimate digit of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Benford ’ s Law analysis is one of the first things run by forensic accountants looking for financial malfeasance or tax cheating .
Many of the electoral tallies in disputed states violate Benford ’ s Law — but only for Joe Biden , whose distribution more closely resembles the curve when people type “ random ” numbers in .
President Trump , Jo Jorgensen , Howie Hawkins , and Kanye West ’ s numbers do not violate this law , but former Vice President Biden ’ s do in disputed areas .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was altered and locked after several enterprising Twitter users began investigating this strand of the 2020 election theft .
The Glitch From Coast to Coast One recurring theme throughout the 2020 election is the glitch .
There have been a number of glitches , many detailed in our series on irregularities in different states .
This , in and of itself might not be cause for concern — however , in every case , these so-called “ software glitches ” favor former Vice President Biden at the expense of President Donald Trump .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ our state series article , but we will mention some here just to give you a general idea of what has been going on with these “ glitches.
” One in Michigan sent 6,000 votes to Biden that were meant for Donald Trump .
Another in Wisconsin , robbed Donald Trump of 19,500 votes .
Another similar glitch in Georgia saw an unspecified number of votes go to Biden that were , once again , meant for the President .
There appears to be a pattern here .
Were these all bona fide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that were meant to go for Joe Biden going to Donald Trump before the situation was corrected .
But we are unaware of any such error in favor of the President .
The common denominator ?
The voting software used to calculate the vote made by a company with deep connections to the DNC .
The DNC ’ s victory in the 2020 Presidential election relies heavily upon a massively increased turnout , again centered around a handful of large cities controlled by the Democratic Party .
One example of this is 90 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wisconsin , which would not only be the highest level of turnout in American history , but also comes close to the 92 percent average in Australia where voting is mandatory .
In the city of Milwaukee alone , the turnout was 84 percent .
Compare this turnout to Cleveland , a culturally comparable city not in a swing state , which had a comparatively scant 51 percent turnout .
This is an important city to draw a contrast with because , while it is a Democratic stronghold , as are most large @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minority population , it was not in a state that was considered in play this election .
Democrats attempted to steal the election by fabricating astronomical turnout in urban areas they control in swing states .
The turnout gambit becomes even more laughable when one considers that Biden is one of the least invigorating Democratic candidates since John Kerry or Mike Dukakis .
Yet somehow this candidate was able to increase his vote above what Barack Obama enjoyed , with some districts in Milwaukee putting up more votes than there are registered voters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conducted by Judicial Watch found that 353 counties across 29 states had turnout exceeding 100 percent of registered voters .
Eight of these had turnout exceeding 100 percent across the entire state : Alaska , Colorado , Maine , Maryland , Michigan , New Jersey , Rhode Island , and Vermont .
Perhaps more damning , the study was limited to 37 states publishing their voter registration data .
This means that , of the 37 states that Judicial Watch had access to , 78 percent of them had turnout exceeding 100 percent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ months in advance that mail-in balloting , illegal throughout most of Europe , is inherently insecure and lends itself to the kind of mass voter fraud that we are seeing in action right now .
But the mail-in ballots that we are seeing in this election are not just nonspecifically “ suspect.
” They are rife with irregularities and a lack of accountability that should cause them to be closely investigated , audited and , where appropriate , thrown out entirely .
Mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania are particularly questionable .
This is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lead in mail-in voting .
More damning is the fact that many of these ballots seem to have arrived before they were even sent , arrived the same day or arrived within one day of being sent .
This is an abnormal amount of processing time , especially when we consider the surge in mail due to the election .
James O ’ Keefe found two whistleblowers at USPS , one of whom was willing to come forward , who told of backdating ballots .
This whistleblower was intimidated by the feds and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his report .
Vetting of mail-in ballots is particularly important because they are widely open to electoral fraud , as we have discussed above .
So it is troubling that we have multiple reports , including in the form of sworn affidavits presented before the court , of poll watchers being thrown out , mocked , intimidated and even physically assaulted during the course of counting mail-in ballots .
Of special note is the strong resistance to poll workers in swing states to allow anyone to watch them .
In Pennsylvania , poll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ watchers despite knowledge of a court order preventing them from doing so .
Reports of expelled poll watchers were part of the lawsuit filed in Michigan and there were similar reports out of Georgia .
This raises the obvious question — why don ’ t they want anyone watching them ?
Biden ’ s turnout when compared with Barack Obama is another area warranting special investigation .
It is worth noting that Biden was generally viewed as a less-than-ideal candidate in no small part because he generated very little enthusiasm among Democratic Party @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a rock star candidate who had just defeated the party ’ s presumptive nominee in a hard-fought primary .
Biden , on the other hand , was largely foisted on the party through back room deals in an attempt to prevent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders from obtaining the nomination for President .
Biden also barely campaigned throughout the primary season .
Most of the campaign was characterized by the candidate calling “ lids , ” a term meaning that he was home for the day and would be doing no more press , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did he start with an unethusiastic base who would have preferred nearly anyone else , he did little to motivate his base throughout the course of the election .
Yet somehow , he outperformed Hillary Clinton who won a hard-fought primary against Senator Sanders and kept pace with numbers from Barack Obama ’ s 2008 and 2012 campaigns , being able to boast that he has received more votes than any other candidate for President in American history .
In some cases — tellingly in areas crucial for winning the election — Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ For example , in Chester , Cumberland , and Montgomery Counties in Pennsylvania , he outperformed Obama by approximately 25 percent .
In Montgomery County , he was able to double Barack Obama ’ s margin of victory .
He increased the raw vote total there by fully 80,000 votes .
The population of this county only increased by 22,000 in the years between Obama ’ s victory and Biden ’ s alleged one .
Not only should we be skeptical of the numbers , we should be skeptical of them because of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dubious numbers were not coming in from places that we could assume were Democratic Party strongholds like New York , Chicago and Miami where Biden actually saw a decrease in voters relative to Hillary Clinton .
So why is he putting up these high totals only in a handful of cities ( Atlanta , Detroit , Milwaukee , Philadelphia ) controlled by Democrats in swing states ?
Another area of suspicion are the Biden-only ballots .
Tens or hundreds of thousands of voters marked their ballots only for Joe Biden , with presumably @ @ @ @ @ @ @ While it ’ s not unusual for people to take an outsized interest in the Presidential election , it is unusual for 450,000 people to have no interest in down ballot races and for this to be concentrated in a handful of swing states .
The strange dichotomy here is that people were far more likely to do this in alleged swing states with competitive Senate races like Georgia , while deep red states like Wyoming did not see a massive number of Biden-only ballots .
In Georgia , there was only a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down ticket Senate races .
Biden , on the other hand , received over 95,000 more votes than either Senate candidate on the ballot in Georgia .
In Wyoming there were a mere 725 more votes for Biden than the Democratic Senate candidate in the state .
Raheem Kassam reports on five states with anomalous Biden-only voting , all of which keep coming up with various irregularities : Pennsylvania ( 98,000 ) , Georgia ( 80-90,000 ) , Arizona ( 42,000 ) , Michigan ( 69-115,000 ) and Wisconsin ( 62,836 ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 29 competitive House races as of November 8 and flipped three state legislatures , but were somehow unable to deliver the White House to the President .
So we are expected to believe that not only did Joe Biden receive more votes than Barack Obama and that these came largely on the back of massive inner-city turnout , but that this massive turnout for Joe Biden was unable to flip a single state legislature .
Biden-only ballots are a recurring theme in all of the states in question .
While they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they do point toward significant irregularities that need to be investigated before Joe Biden can begin claiming victory .
Who Counts the Votes ?
Irregularities In Counting Systems There is a quote often attributed to Joseph Stalin , but is probably apocryphal : It doesn ’ t who votes , it matters who counts the votes .
It doesn ’ t really matter who , if anyone , actually said this .
The point is that it doesn ’ t matter what votes actually say if the votes are ignored or altered by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 21st Century most of our vote counting is done by machines which use proprietary software .
Most states used systems supplied by Dominion Voting Systems .
What ’ s more , the irregularities in vote counting , in particular the “ glitches ” that universally favor Joe Biden , come from these voting systems .
First , we should note that there were 92 donations made by Dominion employees over the last year according to the FEC .
Of these , 80 went to Democratic super PAC ActBlue , seven went to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump campaign and one went to the DNC .
What ’ s more , Dominion Voting Systems has a partnership with the Clinton Global Initiative as well as former employees of the Clinton Growth Initiative on staff , according to One America News Network .
Rudy Giuliani claims that the legal campaign to protect the election has whistleblowers from Dominion ready to go on record .
A bit in the weeds , but worth mentioning , is the allegation that intelligence software was used to change vote counts .
There is a video @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say , this is a bit in the weeds , but worth mentioning for those who wish to go down that rabbit hole .
NOQ Report has been kind enough to do a deep dive on the topic of Dominion ’ s role in the 2020 Presidential election .
They found significant vote switching in Georgia ( 17,407 , where Biden leads with 14,148 votes ) and Pennsylvania ( with over one million votes switched in favor of Joe Biden ) .
The article is mostly just a list of switched votes and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because it sheds light on just how massive a role vote switching played in the 2020 election , further cementing the theory that Dominion played a role in the theft .
Don ’ t let any of this get you down , because the fight is far from over .
Both President Trump and Congressional Republicans are working hard , both in the public sphere and in the courts to make sure that the 2020 election is fair and transparent .
So what can you do to join in the fight ?
First @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That means calling your state rep , your state senator , your House Rep and your U.S .
Senator .
You should do this be they friend or foe — either way , they need to know that you insist on having all legal votes counted .
Insist on concrete steps to ensure the integrity of the vote .
Do not settle for stock answers about the importance of democracy .
A Twitter account has made what is actually a very good script for you to follow when you call in .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ you want to take to the streets , there are opportunities .
Stop The Steal is the movement dedicated to putting bodies in the streets of our nation ’ s state capitals to let our elected officials know that we are not going to stand for seeing our elections stolen in a manner befitting Zimbabwe .
There are almost daily rallies at the state capitol building and the TFC Center in Detroit .
What ’ s more , a nationwide rally in DC called the Million MAGA March is scheduled for November 14 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DC has responded with new COVID restrictions designed to cripple the march .
What can you do ?
Quite a lot .
Nothing less than the future of the country is at stake .
If they can steal this election , don ’ t expect another one to be free and fair .
But do expect a lot of gun grabs and speech laws .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Sam Jacobs
Editor’s Note: Activist Post does not endorse any candidate for president or any other political office. This article is presented for informational purposes only and all opinions are the author’s alone.
Regardless of where one falls politically, the sanctity of the vote is a bedrock of a functioning representative democracy. Voters have to believe their vote matters. And that the vote is free, fair, and accurate.
The basic facts of the 2020 American Presidential election are concerning because mounting evidence indicates there’s been a concerted effort by state Democratic Parties to flip the election from President Donald Trump to former Vice President Joe Biden in a number of key swing states with the help of notoriously corrupt Democratic Party machines in at least five American cities — Detroit, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, Pittsburg, and Atlanta.
Here are the basic facts of the case: On Election Night when America went to bed, President Trump had a commanding lead in virtually every swing state, as well as Virginia, which no one expected him to win. However, when America woke up the next day, we found that he’d lost these leads, largely on the basis of mail-in ballots found in the middle of the night and out from under the watchful eye of legal election monitors.
What’s more, these massive caches of votes – almost all of which were for former Vice President Biden – came via large dumps primarily from the five aforementioned cities in states predominantly run by Democratic governors.
When one looks at the statistical likelihood of the reported turnout, the numbers are so improbable they’re more at home in a one-party state like Saddam Hussein’s Iraq or North Korea.
What’s more, Biden’s victory does not square with the results of the Republican Party nationally: Republicans won 28 of 29 competitive House seats and Democrats were unable to flip a single state legislature. Joe Biden secured a scant three of the so-called “Bellwether Districts” that almost always choose the winner, one of which was in Delaware. Judicial Watch found 353 counties in 29 different states who had higher than 100 percent turnout.
Anecdotally, swing states tend to follow Florida in terms of swinging left or right. This is particularly true in Michigan, which has voted in lockstep with Florida since 1968. Nearly three dozen states had counting machines connected to the Internet during the election, which is inherently insecure. Joe Biden’s lead among mail-in ballots was massive in two states — Michigan and Pennsylvania — while it was in the single digits in most states.
Evidence of chicanery, irregularities, and outright manipulation have poured in from a variety of states — Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Texas, New Jersey, Nevada, and Arizona. This evidence could easily be dismissed as simply weird if one is being generous or naive.
While much of this took place at the state level, there are also irregularities that are occurring across state lines and these are worthy of consideration. It’s not evidence per se, but there was a massive spike in the number of Google searches for “election fraud punishment” in swing states in the 30 days leading up to the election.
Below we explore the details and the data of what happened across the nation on Election Day, with flagrant and often sloppy irregularities occurring from coast to coast. Elsewhere we explore similar efforts in the key swing states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia.
All of the posts in this series will be updated as more credible information is uncovered.
The General Landscape of American Election Fraud
The media is trying to weave a narrative with ever-shifting goalposts. They began by saying that not only did voter fraud not happen, but that it’s impossible. Now, they have shifted their story to saying that there is always minor fraud, but that it never really matters much.
The Heritage Foundation has identified 1,200 elections where voter fraud made the difference in recent decades, long after the era of Jim Crow when election theft was de rigueur. Of these, fully 15 were thrown out specifically because of cheating by mail-in ballot.
Mail-in ballots are largely banned in Europe, where voter ID requirements are likewise the norm. Florida has been recognized specifically as an offender.
Another narrative in the controlled media is that illegal aliens and other non-citizens don’t vote. This is patently untrue. In fact, they vote at alarmingly high rates. A 2019 study found that approximately 2.2 percent of respondents admitted to voting illegally, which implies a little under a million ballots cast by non-citizens every year.
The counterargument is that respondents are either lying or misunderstood the question, but this is simply not true — those who conducted the study verified their votes.
So we can see that electoral fraud is not only impossible, it is common. It is not negligible, it has determined elections in living memory. With this as our backdrop, we will now investigate voter irregularities throughout the nation during the 2020 Presidential election.
What Constitutes Evidence of Electoral Fraud?
Before going further, it is worth discussing what constitutes evidence for electoral fraud. Well, the Carter Center has a set of standards that they use to determine whether or not there has been electoral fraud somewhere.
These are the standards used by globalists to determine whether or not elections they disapprove of have been conducted fraudulently. Several of them are present in the contested states:
Counting procedures should be verifiable.
Votes should be presented for independent review.
Elections should be subject to recounts.
Additionally, the Carter Center states that it is the right of dissidents to challenge and question the results of an election that they believe to be fraudulent. Harassing dissidents is considered evidence of chicanery in and of itself.
“Effective redress” is the term they use and it is considered by the Carter Center to be vital for establishing an election as legitimate. The resistance of the Democratic Party to recounts and audits should be a red flag in and of itself.
There are also mathematical anomalies that are worth looking into because, regardless of turnout and outcome, elections will follow certain patterns. One of these is that, because of mail sorting, mail-in ballots will consistently show the same ratio of support for each candidate. We did not see that, however — there is a significant spike in support for Biden and fall off in support for President Trump as Election Night dragged on.
Indeed, in Wisconsin, this anomaly became massive around 4 a.m., the same time that the massive ballot drops without supervision began. The same phenomenon occurred in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Georgia, all four of these states with copious amounts of electoral chicanery and irregularity. Virginia was another state with similar mathematical irregularities.
Benford’s Law is another area where we see mathematical irregularities. Put simply: When we have large datasets of numbers, there is a pattern we can find with regard to the final and penultimate digit of each number in this data set.
Biden’s Vote Tallies apparently Violate Benford’s Law, everyone else follow across the country, except for Biden in key races. This is a test for catching election fraud, used by the State Department and forensic accountants. https://t.co/XbZtRQyxZuhttps://t.co/crK9HChfnW pic.twitter.com/mHNjStrB2Q — Data Respecter (@DataElefantFan) November 6, 2020
Benford’s Law analysis is one of the first things run by forensic accountants looking for financial malfeasance or tax cheating.
Many of the electoral tallies in disputed states violate Benford’s Law — but only for Joe Biden, whose distribution more closely resembles the curve when people type “random” numbers in. President Trump, Jo Jorgensen, Howie Hawkins, and Kanye West’s numbers do not violate this law, but former Vice President Biden’s do in disputed areas.
The Wikipedia article about Benford’s Law was altered and locked after several enterprising Twitter users began investigating this strand of the 2020 election theft.
The Glitch From Coast to Coast
One recurring theme throughout the 2020 election is the glitch. There have been a number of glitches, many detailed in our series on irregularities in different states. This, in and of itself might not be cause for concern — however, in every case, these so-called “software glitches” favor former Vice President Biden at the expense of President Donald Trump.
Again, we have detailed these in our state series article, but we will mention some here just to give you a general idea of what has been going on with these “glitches.”
One in Michigan sent 6,000 votes to Biden that were meant for Donald Trump. Another in Wisconsin, robbed Donald Trump of 19,500 votes. Another similar glitch in Georgia saw an unspecified number of votes go to Biden that were, once again, meant for the President.
One Michigan county clerk caught a glitch in tabulation software so they hand counted votes and found the glitch caused 6,000 votes to go to Biden + Democrats that were meant for Trump and Republicans. 47 MI counties used this software. All must check now! pic.twitter.com/21AXyJZDZi — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) November 6, 2020
There appears to be a pattern here. Were these all bona fide mistakes, we would likely find votes that were meant to go for Joe Biden going to Donald Trump before the situation was corrected. But we are unaware of any such error in favor of the President.
The common denominator? The voting software used to calculate the vote made by a company with deep connections to the DNC.
The Turnout That Wasn’t
The DNC’s victory in the 2020 Presidential election relies heavily upon a massively increased turnout, again centered around a handful of large cities controlled by the Democratic Party. One example of this is 90 percent turnout in the entire State of Wisconsin, which would not only be the highest level of turnout in American history, but also comes close to the 92 percent average in Australia where voting is mandatory. In the city of Milwaukee alone, the turnout was 84 percent.
Compare this turnout to Cleveland, a culturally comparable city not in a swing state, which had a comparatively scant 51 percent turnout. This is an important city to draw a contrast with because, while it is a Democratic stronghold, as are most large cities, and it has a similar minority population, it was not in a state that was considered in play this election. Democrats attempted to steal the election by fabricating astronomical turnout in urban areas they control in swing states.
The turnout gambit becomes even more laughable when one considers that Biden is one of the least invigorating Democratic candidates since John Kerry or Mike Dukakis. Yet somehow this candidate was able to increase his vote above what Barack Obama enjoyed, with some districts in Milwaukee putting up more votes than there are registered voters in the area.
A broad study conducted by Judicial Watch found that 353 counties across 29 states had turnout exceeding 100 percent of registered voters. Eight of these had turnout exceeding 100 percent across the entire state: Alaska, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Perhaps more damning, the study was limited to 37 states publishing their voter registration data. This means that, of the 37 states that Judicial Watch had access to, 78 percent of them had turnout exceeding 100 percent.
Vetting of Mail-In Ballots
The American public was warned for months in advance that mail-in balloting, illegal throughout most of Europe, is inherently insecure and lends itself to the kind of mass voter fraud that we are seeing in action right now.
But the mail-in ballots that we are seeing in this election are not just nonspecifically “suspect.” They are rife with irregularities and a lack of accountability that should cause them to be closely investigated, audited and, where appropriate, thrown out entirely.
Mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania are particularly questionable. This is a state where Biden enjoyed a 60.5 percent lead in mail-in voting. More damning is the fact that many of these ballots seem to have arrived before they were even sent, arrived the same day or arrived within one day of being sent. This is an abnormal amount of processing time, especially when we consider the surge in mail due to the election.
James O’Keefe found two whistleblowers at USPS, one of whom was willing to come forward, who told of backdating ballots. This whistleblower was intimidated by the feds and it was falsely reported that he recanted his report.
Vetting of mail-in ballots is particularly important because they are widely open to electoral fraud, as we have discussed above. So it is troubling that we have multiple reports, including in the form of sworn affidavits presented before the court, of poll watchers being thrown out, mocked, intimidated and even physically assaulted during the course of counting mail-in ballots.
We have recordings of the federal agents, who COERCED this man through a 4 hour interrogation Without representation, who stands by his original affidavit re: backdating ballots. Standby for recordings doubling down on backdating ballots. This is soviet style truth suppression https://t.co/toK6r8zb2m — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) November 10, 2020
Of special note is the strong resistance to poll workers in swing states to allow anyone to watch them. In Pennsylvania, poll workers were caught on video expelling poll watchers despite knowledge of a court order preventing them from doing so. Reports of expelled poll watchers were part of the lawsuit filed in Michigan and there were similar reports out of Georgia. This raises the obvious question — why don’t they want anyone watching them?
Biden Outperformed Obama
Biden’s turnout when compared with Barack Obama is another area warranting special investigation. It is worth noting that Biden was generally viewed as a less-than-ideal candidate in no small part because he generated very little enthusiasm among Democratic Party voters. In contrast, Obama was a rock star candidate who had just defeated the party’s presumptive nominee in a hard-fought primary. Biden, on the other hand, was largely foisted on the party through back room deals in an attempt to prevent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders from obtaining the nomination for President.
Biden also barely campaigned throughout the primary season. Most of the campaign was characterized by the candidate calling “lids,” a term meaning that he was home for the day and would be doing no more press, with the occasional teleconference. Not only did he start with an unethusiastic base who would have preferred nearly anyone else, he did little to motivate his base throughout the course of the election.
Yet somehow, he outperformed Hillary Clinton who won a hard-fought primary against Senator Sanders and kept pace with numbers from Barack Obama’s 2008 and 2012 campaigns, being able to boast that he has received more votes than any other candidate for President in American history. In some cases — tellingly in areas crucial for winning the election — Biden was able to outperform Barack Obama.
For example, in Chester, Cumberland, and Montgomery Counties in Pennsylvania, he outperformed Obama by approximately 25 percent. In Montgomery County, he was able to double Barack Obama’s margin of victory. He increased the raw vote total there by fully 80,000 votes. The population of this county only increased by 22,000 in the years between Obama’s victory and Biden’s alleged one.
Not only should we be skeptical of the numbers, we should be skeptical of them because of where they came in from. Such dubious numbers were not coming in from places that we could assume were Democratic Party strongholds like New York, Chicago and Miami where Biden actually saw a decrease in voters relative to Hillary Clinton. So why is he putting up these high totals only in a handful of cities (Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, Philadelphia) controlled by Democrats in swing states?
Biden-Only Ballots
Another area of suspicion are the Biden-only ballots. Tens or hundreds of thousands of voters marked their ballots only for Joe Biden, with presumably no interest in down ballot races. While it’s not unusual for people to take an outsized interest in the Presidential election, it is unusual for 450,000 people to have no interest in down ballot races and for this to be concentrated in a handful of swing states.
The strange dichotomy here is that people were far more likely to do this in alleged swing states with competitive Senate races like Georgia, while deep red states like Wyoming did not see a massive number of Biden-only ballots. In Georgia, there was only a difference of 818 votes between Trump and down ticket Senate races. Biden, on the other hand, received over 95,000 more votes than either Senate candidate on the ballot in Georgia. In Wyoming there were a mere 725 more votes for Biden than the Democratic Senate candidate in the state.
In Georgia 95,801 ballots only voted for Biden and no other race. In Georgia 818 people only voted for Trump and no other race. Forgive me if I find that very bizarre and suspicious. — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) November 11, 2020
Raheem Kassam reports on five states with anomalous Biden-only voting, all of which keep coming up with various irregularities: Pennsylvania (98,000), Georgia (80-90,000), Arizona (42,000), Michigan (69-115,000) and Wisconsin (62,836).
All told, Republicans won 28 out of 29 competitive House races as of November 8 and flipped three state legislatures, but were somehow unable to deliver the White House to the President. So we are expected to believe that not only did Joe Biden receive more votes than Barack Obama and that these came largely on the back of massive inner-city turnout, but that this massive turnout for Joe Biden was unable to flip a single state legislature.
Biden-only ballots are a recurring theme in all of the states in question. While they are by no means a smoking gun, they do point toward significant irregularities that need to be investigated before Joe Biden can begin claiming victory.
Who Counts the Votes? Irregularities In Counting Systems
There is a quote often attributed to Joseph Stalin, but is probably apocryphal: It doesn’t who votes, it matters who counts the votes. It doesn’t really matter who, if anyone, actually said this. The point is that it doesn’t matter what votes actually say if the votes are ignored or altered by the person doing the counting.
In the 21st Century most of our vote counting is done by machines which use proprietary software. Most states used systems supplied by Dominion Voting Systems. What’s more, the irregularities in vote counting, in particular the “glitches” that universally favor Joe Biden, come from these voting systems.
First, we should note that there were 92 donations made by Dominion employees over the last year according to the FEC. Of these, 80 went to Democratic super PAC ActBlue, seven went to Senator Bernie Sanders, four to the Trump campaign and one went to the DNC. What’s more, Dominion Voting Systems has a partnership with the Clinton Global Initiative as well as former employees of the Clinton Growth Initiative on staff, according to One America News Network.
Rudy Giuliani claims that the legal campaign to protect the election has whistleblowers from Dominion ready to go on record.
Dominion Voting Systems has machines in more than 1/3 of the U.S. They never had a lobbyist in DC until last year when they hired Brownstein Farber Hyatt & Schreck. One of the account's main supervisors is Nadeam Elshami, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-CA) former chief of staff. — Independent Women's Voice (@IWV) November 9, 2020
A bit in the weeds, but worth mentioning, is the allegation that intelligence software was used to change vote counts. There is a video on this subject here. As we say, this is a bit in the weeds, but worth mentioning for those who wish to go down that rabbit hole.
NOQ Report has been kind enough to do a deep dive on the topic of Dominion’s role in the 2020 Presidential election. They found significant vote switching in Georgia (17,407, where Biden leads with 14,148 votes) and Pennsylvania (with over one million votes switched in favor of Joe Biden). The article is mostly just a list of switched votes and lost votes, but it bears reading because it sheds light on just how massive a role vote switching played in the 2020 election, further cementing the theory that Dominion played a role in the theft.
Fight Back to Save America
Don’t let any of this get you down, because the fight is far from over. Both President Trump and Congressional Republicans are working hard, both in the public sphere and in the courts to make sure that the 2020 election is fair and transparent.
So what can you do to join in the fight?
First, you should call your elected representatives. That means calling your state rep, your state senator, your House Rep and your U.S. Senator. You should do this be they friend or foe — either way, they need to know that you insist on having all legal votes counted. Insist on concrete steps to ensure the integrity of the vote. Do not settle for stock answers about the importance of democracy. A Twitter account has made what is actually a very good script for you to follow when you call in. Be firm, but polite.
Here is a SCRIPT I have written for you to contact your state legislators! Please share and revise as necessary!!! pic.twitter.com/0Oq5cw4AoQ — TrumpImageVault (@VaultTrump) November 7, 2020
If you want to take to the streets, there are opportunities. Stop The Steal is the movement dedicated to putting bodies in the streets of our nation’s state capitals to let our elected officials know that we are not going to stand for seeing our elections stolen in a manner befitting Zimbabwe. There are almost daily rallies at the state capitol building and the TFC Center in Detroit. What’s more, a nationwide rally in DC called the Million MAGA March is scheduled for November 14. The Democratic government of Washington, DC has responded with new COVID restrictions designed to cripple the march.
What can you do? Quite a lot. Nothing less than the future of the country is at stake. If they can steal this election, don’t expect another one to be free and fair. But do expect a lot of gun grabs and speech laws.
Source: Libertas Bella
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-11-13--The Canadian Military Declares War on Canadians — Propaganda Watch

Dan Dicks of PressForTruth.ca joins us to delve deeper into the insane story of the Canadian military fake wolves psyop .
We go beyond the ludicrous story of the government using fake wolves to scare the public to discover that the Canadian military is now openly announcing that they are targeting the Canadian public themselves with their newly-weaponized public affairs department .
The Canadian military has declared war on Canada .
Will Canadians even notice ?
Watch on Archive / BitChute / LBRY / Minds / YouTube or Download the mp4 • Canadian Military FAKE WOLVES FEAR CAMPAIGN EXPOSED !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ They Are Doing NEXT !
!
!
• Forged letter warning about wolves on the loose part of Canadian Forces propaganda campaign that went awry • THIS Is How You CONDITION The Masses For The MILITARIZATION OF COVID-19 ( 84 ) !
!
!
• Canadian military wants to establish new organization to use propaganda , other techniques to influence Canadians Visit James Corbett at CorbettReport.com .
Subscribe to his channel on YouTube and Bitchute , and support him on Patreon .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , MeWe and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By The Corbett Report
Dan Dicks of PressForTruth.ca joins us to delve deeper into the insane story of the Canadian military fake wolves psyop.
We go beyond the ludicrous story of the government using fake wolves to scare the public to discover that the Canadian military is now openly announcing that they are targeting the Canadian public themselves with their newly-weaponized public affairs department.
The Canadian military has declared war on Canada. Will Canadians even notice?
?
Watch on Archive / BitChute / LBRY / Minds / YouTube or Download the mp4
Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
SHOW NOTES
Visit James Corbett at CorbettReport.com. Subscribe to his channel on YouTube and Bitchute, and support him on Patreon.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, MeWe and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.