activistpost--2020-09-11--World Economic Forum’s Techno-Totalitarian Roadmap

Global elite Technocrats can not fathom how there could be any blowback against their techno-totalitarian dreams of Utopia .
Those who do resist are viewed as an expendable nuisance and too ignorant to know what is good for themselves .
⁃ Technocracy News & Trends Editor Patrick Wood The Corona crisis is the trigger for a global coup d ’ état of monumental dimensions .
It is the beginning of a new era , with a new international economic order that risks completely destroying human freedoms .
Tyrants have now taken over to forcibly steer us into a “ climate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through the World Economic Forum ’ s new techno-totalitarian roadmap – “ The Great Reset ” .
On June 13 , 2019 , Klaus Schwab , President of the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) and UN Secretary-General António Guterres signed a partnership between their two organisations .
This was done without any direct media attention despite the tremendous implications this poses to humanity .
By and large , this means that the power over our lives with a stroke of a pen has been transferred to the big global corporations and their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is to accelerate the UN Sustainability Agenda and the 17 global targets .
The agreement also states that the WEF ’ s fourth industrial revolution is an important component in implementing the agenda .
Digitisation is seen as the key .
A few months later , during the Meeting in Davos in January 2020 , this was made very clear by the launch of the Unlocking Technology for the Global Goals report compiled by PWC .
This means that the world ’ s tech giants ( which are part of the WEF working @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s problems through the use of AI , satellites , robotics , drones and the Internet of Things , and with synthetic food on the menu .
By declaring Covid-19 as a pandemic on March 11 , the World Health Organization ( WHO ) opened up an opportunity window for the WEF to quickly implement its new world order .
Everything was very carefully prepared .
As early as 2006 , the WEF ’ s first report on global risks had discussed the measures to be taken in the event of a pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the context of Swine Flu in 2009 ) .
After that , the working groups continued to sew their network .
In 2010 , the Rockefeller Foundation published Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development , which described the scenario of a future shutdown almost prophetically : A year before the virus began to hit the world , the WEF released the report Outbreak Readiness and Business Impact Protecting Lives and Livelihoods across the Global Economy .
The great preparations were getting ready .
In October 2019 , a dress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exercise ( which involved stakeholders such as the WEF , Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Johns Hopkins University ) .
A detailed review is done among other things in my post The Corona Crisis and the Technocratic Agenda .
After a few months of extreme measures in which communities were shut down and authoritarian control rules were introduced simultaneously around the world , Klaus Schwab and António Guterres , along with Prince Charles , among others , on June 3 forward and offered a solution to all problems – “ The Great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2020 , the WEF released the book “ COVID-19 : The Great Reset ” in which the thoughts were developed by Schwab and co-author Thierry Malleret ( director of the WEF ’ s Global Risk Network ) .
The purpose of the book is to create an understanding of the future ahead and is divided into three main chapters .
• Macro Reset – which analyzes the impact on the economy , society , geopolitics , environment and technology .
• Micro Reset – which analyzes consequences for industries and businesses .
• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an individual level .
According to the authors , we are faced with a choice .
One way will take us to a better world : more inclusive , more equal , and respectful to Mother Earth .
The second way will take us to a world reminiscent of the one we have left – but worse and with ever-recurring unpleasant surprises .
They thus threaten to harass us until we give way and accept their techno-utopian vision for the world .
Geopolitical Reset : COVID-19 has reminded the world that the main @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , pandemics , terrorism , international trade ) .
However , global organisations have not been sufficiently equipped and lacked effective leadership .
According to the authors , the current system has not been able to deal with the corona crisis , but has instead been characterised by uncoordinated national measures .
According to the authors , this demonstrates the need for more effective and coordinated leadership and that nationalism only leads us wrong .
This has been particularly demonstrated in Africa , Latin America and Asia , where nations are even in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the crisis .
Violence , hunger , unemployment and chaos come in its place .
Famine disasters of biblical proportions can occur .
This risks creating a new wave of mass migration similar to the one that occurred in 2015-2016 .
The world will become a more dangerous and poorer place if we do not create global institutions , according to Schwab and Malleret .
Without these , the global economy can not be restarted .
It is not so difficult to assume that the World Economic Forum is happy to contribute this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ UN indicates .
In any case , the next few years look to be very tough .
It is the chaos that precedes the order .
Environmental Reset : According to the authors , both pandemics and climate change/ecosystem collapse show the complex interplay between man and nature .
They argue that COVID-19 has given the world a taste of what a full-fledged climate crisis and ecosystem collapse means for the economy , geopolitics , social issues and technological development .
The crises also share common attributes such as that they are global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resolved through global coordination .
One difference is that pandemics require immediate action where the results are rapid , while climate change does not feel as tangible and therefore not seen as as important to address .
During a pandemic , the majority agree to coercive measures while opposing limitations in their life choices if it is about climate change where scientific evidence is questionable .
The book relates to studies where pandemics such as COVID-19 are considered to be related to human impact on the environment .
As usual , we people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disappointing that carbon dioxide emissions have only decreased by 8 % during the shutdown .
The conclusion is that a radical change in energy systems and structural changes in our consumption habits are needed .
However , it is doubtful that these restrictions apply to Schwab and his friends in the Politburo .
The pandemic is predicted to dominate politics for several years , thus risking making climate work less urgent – COP26 , for example , was cancelled .
Schwab ( along with his allies ) wants to avoid this and instead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up opportunities to implement their “ sustainable ” environmental policies .
Governments and businesses will in this scenario be encouraged to “ make the right choice ” by large sections of the population developing a new social conscience that a different way of life is possible .
This is driven by a fortunately crafted activism .
Since governments may be tempted to return to the old order , four key areas should be used to steer development in the “ right ” direction : • Enlightened leadership – Leaders who are at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( the book points out , among other things , Prince Charles ) .
• Risk awareness – The attention that COVID-19 has given us about interdependence and the consequences of not listening to scientific expertise has raised awareness .
• Behavioural change – The pandemic has forced us to change our travel and consumption patterns and through it embraced a “ greener ” way of life .
• Activism – The Corona virus has inspired change and created new strategies for social activism .
Climate activists who have seen air pollution reduced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on businesses and investors .
The European Commission ’ s massive Green Deal , with its plan to invest a trillion euros with the aim of reducing emissions and introducing a Circular Economy , is considered the most tangible example of how the authorities are not going to put the Corona crisis to waste .
Technological Reset : According to the authors , the Corona crisis has meant that digital development in a month has taken a step that would otherwise take up to two years .
Everything has been largely moved online @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are the winners and their merits during the crisis have been massive while all business ideas based on face-to-face meetings ( such as the cultural sector and restaurants ) are the losers .
This is something that , according to Schwab and Malleret , will largely remain .
The Corona crisis has caused a lasting impact on work , education , commerce , medicine and entertainment .
In addition , it has caused a major intrusion into our privacy .
This has also led governments around the world to abandon the process of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Instead , all inhibitions have been released .
Temporary regulations that have been put in place during the crisis may , according to the authors , also continue .
It is also about social distance .
Societies will put emphasis on restructuring workplaces to minimise human contact .
For employees in the hotel , restaurant and education sector , the future thus looks dark .
The authors foresee a massive automation to manage hygiene and cleanliness , which in turn will accelerate the digital transformation .
Domestic production is , however , projected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it comes at a price .
It makes people redundant and it is clear that it is simpler jobs that are at risk .
It all gives a chilly and deeply anti-human taste .
But it ’ s getting worse .
According to the authors , the closures have a high economic price that makes other methods necessary .
This opens up permanent technological solutions such as contact tracking where all our movements can be tracked ( tracking ) and analyzed ( tracing ) in order to be able to quarantine infected people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us apart at all costs , but also of studying all our activities back in time .
Several countries , such as South Korea , China and Hong Kong , used intrusive and compelling real-time tracking methods during the pandemic .
In Hong Kong , electronic bracelets were used while other countries used mobile apps to keep track of the fact that infected people did not leave their quarantine .
Singapore ’ s TraceTogether app , which warns of infected people if they come within a two-metre radius and then sends data to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a possible intermediate route by the authors .
The authors also point to the problems that arise if these monitoring systems are based on volunteerism : Common standards for contact tracing may be adopted in the light of the different systems ( in particular the EU is identified ) .
Schwab and Malleret write that contact tracking enables an “ early intervention ” against “ super-spreading environments ” such as family gatherings .
It is not difficult to see that the tracking can easily also be used against anyone who opposes this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who are the contagion in the eyes of these tyrants .
They describe how companies all over the world ( as countries start to open up ) have started to introduce digital monitoring of their employees so as not to risk new infection .
This , of course , goes against all ethical rules and human rights .
The authors also point out that once the systems are in place , they are also unlikely to be removed ( even if the risk of infection disappears ) .
The authors write that a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ security officials predict that this will give rise to a dystopian future .
The book gives a clear warning that a global techno-totalitarian surveillance state is being built with Coronan as an excuse .
There is no doubt , however , that the authors believe that the benefits outweigh the downsides ( as is also evident in Schwab ’ s two books on the Fourth Industrial Revolution ) .
Schwab and Malleret conclude the chapter by pointing out that “ the rulers and ourselves may control and exploit the benefits of technology without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ freedoms ” .
Schwab , which has a central role in creating and promoting the tyrannical surveillance system , thus leaves responsibility to the rest of us .
For entrepreneurs , according to the authors , there is now no return to the system that existed before .
COVID-19 has changed everything .
What now , according to Schwab and Malleret , applies is : Companies that do not follow the tyrants ’ recommendations for a total digital transformation will find it difficult to survive .
The winners are major e-commerce companies and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Netflix and Zoom .
For example , Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos ’ already astronomical wealth is said to have increased by 60 % during the crisis .
The trade has in a short time been taken over by a few monopolistic parasites .
The same goes for video conferencing company Zoom .
Their rise in spring 2020 is exceptional .
Pretty much everything is predicted to move to the cybersphere .
In 2019 , 1 % of online consultations with doctors took place in England .
During the Corona crisis , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ E-commerce is also expected to grow as customers are forced online .
It ’ s Big Tech and the health industry that are victorious .
In the post-coronaera , governments are also expected to have greater control over entrepreneurship .
The stimulus packages come with conditions for the conduct of the business .
What , according to the authors , will be Stakeholder Capitalism with Environmental , Social and Corporate Governance ( ESG ) .
This means that companies should take their social responsibility and invest “ sustainably ” .
Through activism from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are under pressure to make the right choice .
This is strongly reminiscent of Pieter Winsemius ’ sustainability formula for large companies described in his book “ A Thousand Shades of Green : sustainable strategies for competitive advantage ” and the Trilateral Commission ’ s report “ Beyond Interdependence ” .
In the last chapter , the authors examine the individual consequences of the pandemic .
They write that unlike other disasters such as earthquakes and floods , which bring sympathy and bring people closer together , the pandemic has had the opposite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us humans .
The pandemic is a protracted process that combines a strong fear of dying with uncertainty about when the danger is over .
The pandemic can keep coming back .
It has also been accompanied by authoritarian and erratic measures by the authorities .
This results in anxiety .
The pandemic also gives rise to selfish acts because everyone around is perceived as a potential carrier .
We ’ re not helping others because of the fear of death .
It also creates guilt and shame .
It is impossible to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also evident in the macro scale through countries that closed their borders and severely restricted travel .
These measures have also given rise to racism and trigger patriotism and nationalism .
The authors see this as a “ toxic mixture ” .
The authors show the awareness that disaster makers have about the psychological effects that social isolation has on humans .
We have not been able to seek support among friends and family in the same way .
We have been deprived of the closeness that we need to function .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ slowly degrade .
This means that mental illness has increased dramatically during the year .
They point out that : • Individuals with previous mental problems will have worse anxiety attacks .
• Social distance will increase mental problems even after the measures have been withdrawn .
• Loss of income and jobs will increase the number of deaths through suicide , overdoses and alcoholism etc .
• Domestic violence will increase as the pandemic continues .
• ‘ Vulnerable ’ people and children , carers , socially disadvantaged and disabled people , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authors point out that this will reflect the need for mental health care in the years following to deal with the trauma .
The area will thus have a major priority for decision-makers in the aftermath of the Corona crisis .
This shows how chilly and ruthless these tyrants are .
They know very well what they have caused .
This is the effect they sought and that will make us make the “ right ” choice .
As a flock of sheep , we shall be driven into their technological dictatorship .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ care will take shape : The technology should also be able to measure our carbon footprint , our impact on biodiversity and toxicity in everything that we put in us !
The control needs of the technocrats seem to be insatiable .
According to the authors , the pandemic has also given us time to reflect on what we value in life , the time in isolation provides insight into our previously unsustainable lifestyle as neglected climate and environment .
According to Schwab , this can now be corrected : The conclusions discuss @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic .
It is pointed out that COVID-19 until the end of June only killed 0.006 % of the world ’ s population .
It should be put in relation to the Black Death ( 30-40 % of the population ) and Spanish Disease ( 2.7 % of the population ) .
Corona ’ s death toll is thus not exactly something that justifies the total shutdown of the world .
We have paid and will have to pay a high price for something that has been exaggerated beyond all proportions and which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ introduce a new techno-totalitarian order .
The tyrants have operated according to the principle of ‘ crises open up to business opportunities ’ and have been able to effectively capitalise on the suffering they have caused us humans .
They also threaten us to come back with their terror if we do not accept their plans to govern and regulate our lives in detail .
These are purely mafia-like methods .
None of us have chosen Schwab and his friends within the billionaire club to dictate our lives .
It is high time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place is behind bars .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

Global elite Technocrats cannot fathom how there could be any blowback against their techno-totalitarian dreams of Utopia. Those who do resist are viewed as an expendable nuisance and too ignorant to know what is good for themselves. ⁃ Technocracy News & Trends Editor Patrick Wood
By:
The Corona crisis is the trigger for a global coup d’état of monumental dimensions. It is the beginning of a new era, with a new international economic order that risks completely destroying human freedoms. Tyrants have now taken over to forcibly steer us into a “climate smart” and “healthy” world through the World Economic Forum’s new techno-totalitarian roadmap – “The Great Reset”.
On June 13, 2019, Klaus Schwab, President of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and UN Secretary-General António Guterres signed a partnership between their two organisations. This was done without any direct media attention despite the tremendous implications this poses to humanity. By and large, this means that the power over our lives with a stroke of a pen has been transferred to the big global corporations and their owners.
The agreement includes six focus areas:
Funding for the UN Agenda 2030
Climate change
Health
Digital collaboration
Gender equality and women’s liberation
Education and skills development.
The aim of the partnership is to accelerate the UN Sustainability Agenda and the 17 global targets.
Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals is essential for the future of humanity. The World Economic Forum is committed to supporting this effort, and working with the United Nations to build a more prosperous and equitable future.
The agreement also states that the WEF’s fourth industrial revolution is an important component in implementing the agenda. Digitisation is seen as the key.
A few months later, during the Meeting in Davos in January 2020, this was made very clear by the launch of the Unlocking Technology for the Global Goals report compiled by PWC. This means that the world’s tech giants (which are part of the WEF working groups) will solve the world’s problems through the use of AI, satellites, robotics, drones and the Internet of Things, and with synthetic food on the menu.
By declaring Covid-19 as a pandemic on March 11, the World Health Organization (WHO) opened up an opportunity window for the WEF to quickly implement its new world order. Everything was very carefully prepared.
As early as 2006, the WEF’s first report on global risks had discussed the measures to be taken in the event of a pandemic (some of the recommendations were tested in the context of Swine Flu in 2009). After that, the working groups continued to sew their network. In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, which described the scenario of a future shutdown almost prophetically:
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty – and their privacy – to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose orders in the ways they saw fit.
A year before the virus began to hit the world, the WEF released the report Outbreak Readiness and Business Impact Protecting Lives and Livelihoods across the Global Economy. The great preparations were getting ready.
In October 2019, a dress rehearsal was performed through the Event 201 exercise (which involved stakeholders such as the WEF, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Johns Hopkins University). A detailed review is done among other things in my post The Corona Crisis and the Technocratic Agenda.
The Great Reset
After a few months of extreme measures in which communities were shut down and authoritarian control rules were introduced simultaneously around the world, Klaus Schwab and António Guterres, along with Prince Charles, among others, on June 3 forward and offered a solution to all problems – “The Great Reset”.
Schwab declared:
The COVID-19 crisis has shown us that our old systems are not adapted for the 21st century. It has exposed a fundamental lack of social cohesion, justice, inclusion and equality. Now the historic moment has arrived, not only to fight the real virus, but also to reshape the system according to the needs of corona’s legacy. We have a choice to remain passive, which would reinforce many of the trends we see today. Polarisation, nationalism, racism and ultimately increasing social unrest with conflict. But we have a different choice, we can build a new social contract, which specifically integrates the next generation, we can change our behaviors to be in harmony with nature again, and we can ensure that the technology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is best utilized to give us better lives.
On July 9, 2020, the WEF released the book “COVID-19: The Great Reset” in which the thoughts were developed by Schwab and co-author Thierry Malleret (director of the WEF’s Global Risk Network). The purpose of the book is to create an understanding of the future ahead and is divided into three main chapters.
Macro Reset – which analyzes the impact on the economy, society, geopolitics, environment and technology.
Micro Reset – which analyzes consequences for industries and businesses.
Individual Reset – which discusses consequences on an individual level.
According to the authors, we are faced with a choice. One way will take us to a better world: more inclusive, more equal, and respectful to Mother Earth. The second way will take us to a world reminiscent of the one we have left – but worse and with ever-recurring unpleasant surprises. They thus threaten to harass us until we give way and accept their techno-utopian vision for the world.
Macro reset
Geopolitical Reset: COVID-19 has reminded the world that the main problems are global in nature (climate, pandemics, terrorism, international trade). However, global organisations have not been sufficiently equipped and lacked effective leadership. According to the authors, the current system has not been able to deal with the corona crisis, but has instead been characterised by uncoordinated national measures. According to the authors, this demonstrates the need for more effective and coordinated leadership and that nationalism only leads us wrong.
Therefore, the concern is that, without appropriate Global Governance, we will become paralysed in our attempts to address and respond to global challenges.
This has been particularly demonstrated in Africa, Latin America and Asia, where nations are even in danger of collapsing from the pressures of the crisis.
Any lockdown or health crisis caused by the coronavirus could rapidly create widespread desperation and disorder, potentially triggering massive unrest with global knock-out effects.
Violence, hunger, unemployment and chaos come in its place. Famine disasters of biblical proportions can occur. This risks creating a new wave of mass migration similar to the one that occurred in 2015-2016.
The world will become a more dangerous and poorer place if we do not create global institutions, according to Schwab and Malleret. Without these, the global economy cannot be restarted. It is not so difficult to assume that the World Economic Forum is happy to contribute this management just as their partnership with the UN indicates. In any case, the next few years look to be very tough. It is the chaos that precedes the order.
Environmental Reset: According to the authors, both pandemics and climate change/ecosystem collapse show the complex interplay between man and nature. They argue that COVID-19 has given the world a taste of what a full-fledged climate crisis and ecosystem collapse means for the economy, geopolitics, social issues and technological development. The crises also share common attributes such as that they are global in their scope and can only be resolved through global coordination.
At first glance, the pandemic and the environment seem to be only distantly related cousins, but they are much closer and more intertwined than we think.
One difference is that pandemics require immediate action where the results are rapid, while climate change does not feel as tangible and therefore not seen as as important to address. During a pandemic, the majority agree to coercive measures while opposing limitations in their life choices if it is about climate change where scientific evidence is questionable. The book relates to studies where pandemics such as COVID-19 are considered to be related to human impact on the environment. As usual, we people are to blame and it is expressed disappointing that carbon dioxide emissions have only decreased by 8% during the shutdown. The conclusion is that a radical change in energy systems and structural changes in our consumption habits are needed. However, it is doubtful that these restrictions apply to Schwab and his friends in the Politburo.
If, in the post-pandemic era, we decide to resume our lives just as before (by driving the same cars, by heating our homes the same way and so on), the COVID-19 crisis will have gone to waste as far as climate policies are concerned.
The pandemic is predicted to dominate politics for several years, thus risking making climate work less urgent – COP26, for example, was cancelled. Schwab (along with his allies) wants to avoid this and instead sees how the COVID-19 crisis can open up opportunities to implement their “sustainable” environmental policies. Governments and businesses will in this scenario be encouraged to “make the right choice” by large sections of the population developing a new social conscience that a different way of life is possible. This is driven by a fortunately crafted activism.
Since governments may be tempted to return to the old order, four key areas should be used to steer development in the “right” direction:
Enlightened leadership – Leaders who are at the forefront of the fight against climate change (the book points out, among other things, Prince Charles).
Risk awareness – The attention that COVID-19 has given us about interdependence and the consequences of not listening to scientific expertise has raised awareness.
Behavioural change – The pandemic has forced us to change our travel and consumption patterns and through it embraced a “greener” way of life.
Activism – The Corona virus has inspired change and created new strategies for social activism. Climate activists who have seen air pollution reduced during the shutdown will double their pressure on businesses and investors.
The European Commission’s massive Green Deal, with its plan to invest a trillion euros with the aim of reducing emissions and introducing a Circular Economy, is considered the most tangible example of how the authorities are not going to put the Corona crisis to waste.
Technological Reset: According to the authors, the Corona crisis has meant that digital development in a month has taken a step that would otherwise take up to two years. Everything has been largely moved online. It is the technology companies that are the winners and their merits during the crisis have been massive while all business ideas based on face-to-face meetings (such as the cultural sector and restaurants) are the losers. This is something that, according to Schwab and Malleret, will largely remain. The Corona crisis has caused a lasting impact on work, education, commerce, medicine and entertainment. In addition, it has caused a major intrusion into our privacy.
“… the pandemic will accelerate innovation even more, catalysing technological changes already under way and “turbocharging” any digital business or the digital dimension of any business.” “We will see how contact tracing has an unequalled capacity and a quasi-essential place in the armoury needed to combat COVID-19, while at the same time being positioned to become an enabler of mass surveillance.”
This has also led governments around the world to abandon the process of lengthy investigations to regulate new technology. Instead, all inhibitions have been released. Temporary regulations that have been put in place during the crisis may, according to the authors, also continue. It is also about social distance. Societies will put emphasis on restructuring workplaces to minimise human contact. For employees in the hotel, restaurant and education sector, the future thus looks dark. The authors foresee a massive automation to manage hygiene and cleanliness, which in turn will accelerate the digital transformation. Domestic production is, however, projected to increase due to robotization.
From the onset of the lockdowns, it became apparent that robots and AI were a natural alternative when human labour was not available.
But it comes at a price. It makes people redundant and it is clear that it is simpler jobs that are at risk. It all gives a chilly and deeply anti-human taste. But it’s getting worse. According to the authors, the closures have a high economic price that makes other methods necessary. This opens up permanent technological solutions such as contact tracking where all our movements can be tracked (tracking) and analyzed (tracing) in order to be able to quarantine infected people.
A tracking app gains insight in real time by, for example determine a person’s current location through geodata via GPS coordinates or radio signals.
It is a question of keeping us apart at all costs, but also of studying all our activities back in time. Several countries, such as South Korea, China and Hong Kong, used intrusive and compelling real-time tracking methods during the pandemic. In Hong Kong, electronic bracelets were used while other countries used mobile apps to keep track of the fact that infected people did not leave their quarantine. Singapore’s TraceTogether app, which warns of infected people if they come within a two-metre radius and then sends data to the Ministry of Health, is seen as a possible intermediate route by the authors. The authors also point to the problems that arise if these monitoring systems are based on volunteerism:
No voluntary contract-tracing app will work if people are unwilling to provide their own personal data to the governmental agency that monitors the system, if any individual refuses to download the app (and therefore to withhold information about a possible infection, movements and contacts), everyone will adversely be affected.
Common standards for contact tracing may be adopted in the light of the different systems (in particular the EU is identified).
Schwab and Malleret write that contact tracking enables an “early intervention” against “super-spreading environments” such as family gatherings. It is not difficult to see that the tracking can easily also be used against anyone who opposes this diabolical system. It is we humans who are the contagion in the eyes of these tyrants.
They describe how companies all over the world (as countries start to open up) have started to introduce digital monitoring of their employees so as not to risk new infection. This, of course, goes against all ethical rules and human rights. The authors also point out that once the systems are in place, they are also unlikely to be removed (even if the risk of infection disappears).
The authors write that a host of analysts, policy makers and security officials predict that this will give rise to a dystopian future. The book gives a clear warning that a global techno-totalitarian surveillance state is being built with Coronan as an excuse. There is no doubt, however, that the authors believe that the benefits outweigh the downsides (as is also evident in Schwab’s two books on the Fourth Industrial Revolution).
It is true that in the post-pandemic era, personal health will become a much greater priority for society, which is why the genie of tech-surveillance will not be put back in the bottle.
Schwab and Malleret conclude the chapter by pointing out that “the rulers and ourselves may control and exploit the benefits of technology without sacrificing our individual and collective values and freedoms”. Schwab, which has a central role in creating and promoting the tyrannical surveillance system, thus leaves responsibility to the rest of us.
Micro Reset
For entrepreneurs, according to the authors, there is now no return to the system that existed before. COVID-19 has changed everything.
When confronted with it, some industry leaders and senior executives may be tempted to equate reset with restart, hope to go back to the old normal and restore what worked in the past: traditions, tested procedures and familar ways of doing things – in short, a return to business as usual. This won’t happen because it can’t happen. For the most part business as usual died from (or at least was infected by) COVID-19.
What now, according to Schwab and Malleret, applies is:
Teleworking
Virtual meetings
More efficient decision-making processes
Acceleration of digitization and digital solutions
Companies that do not follow the tyrants’ recommendations for a total digital transformation will find it difficult to survive. The winners are major e-commerce companies and streaming services such as Alibaba, Amazon, Netflix and Zoom. For example, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos’ already astronomical wealth is said to have increased by 60% during the crisis. The trade has in a short time been taken over by a few monopolistic parasites. The same goes for video conferencing company Zoom. Their rise in spring 2020 is exceptional. Pretty much everything is predicted to move to the cybersphere. In 2019, 1% of online consultations with doctors took place in England. During the Corona crisis, it’s been at 100%. E-commerce is also expected to grow as customers are forced online. It’s Big Tech and the health industry that are victorious.
Three industries in particular will flourish (in aggregate) in the post-pandemic era: big tech, health and wellness.
In the post-coronaera, governments are also expected to have greater control over entrepreneurship. The stimulus packages come with conditions for the conduct of the business. What, according to the authors, will be Stakeholder Capitalism with Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG). This means that companies should take their social responsibility and invest “sustainably”. Through activism from NGO’s like Greenpeace, companies are under pressure to make the right choice. This is strongly reminiscent of Pieter Winsemius’ sustainability formula for large companies described in his book “A Thousand Shades of Green: sustainable strategies for competitive advantage” and the Trilateral Commission’s report “Beyond Interdependence”.
Individual Reset
In the last chapter, the authors examine the individual consequences of the pandemic. They write that unlike other disasters such as earthquakes and floods, which bring sympathy and bring people closer together, the pandemic has had the opposite effect. It has been devastating for us humans. The pandemic is a protracted process that combines a strong fear of dying with uncertainty about when the danger is over. The pandemic can keep coming back. It has also been accompanied by authoritarian and erratic measures by the authorities. This results in anxiety.
The pandemic also gives rise to selfish acts because everyone around is perceived as a potential carrier. We’re not helping others because of the fear of death. It also creates guilt and shame. It is impossible to act “right”. This is also evident in the macro scale through countries that closed their borders and severely restricted travel. These measures have also given rise to racism and trigger patriotism and nationalism. The authors see this as a “toxic mixture”.
Humans are inherently social beings. Companionship and social interactions are a vital component of our humanness. If deprived of them, we find our lives upside down. Social relations are to a significant extent, obliberated by confinement measures and physical and social distancing, and in the case of the COVID-19 lockdowns, this occured at a time of heightened anxiety when we needed them most.
The authors show the awareness that disaster makers have about the psychological effects that social isolation has on humans. We have not been able to seek support among friends and family in the same way. We have been deprived of the closeness that we need to function. It becomes like a prolonged torture where we slowly degrade. This means that mental illness has increased dramatically during the year. They point out that:
Individuals with previous mental problems will have worse anxiety attacks.
Social distance will increase mental problems even after the measures have been withdrawn.
Loss of income and jobs will increase the number of deaths through suicide, overdoses and alcoholism etc.
Domestic violence will increase as the pandemic continues.
‘Vulnerable’ people and children, carers, socially disadvantaged and disabled people, will have increased mental ill-health.
The authors point out that this will reflect the need for mental health care in the years following to deal with the trauma. The area will thus have a major priority for decision-makers in the aftermath of the Corona crisis.
This shows how chilly and ruthless these tyrants are. They know very well what they have caused. This is the effect they sought and that will make us make the “right” choice. As a flock of sheep, we shall be driven into their technological dictatorship.
The chapter on entrepreneurship presents how future care will take shape:
Like for any other industry, digital will play a significant role in shaping the future of wellness. The combination of AI, the IoT and sensors and wearable technology will produce new insights into personal well-being. They will monitor how we are and feel, and will progressively blur the boundaries between public healthcare systems and personalized health creation systems…
The technology should also be able to measure our carbon footprint, our impact on biodiversity and toxicity in everything that we put in us! The control needs of the technocrats seem to be insatiable.
According to the authors, the pandemic has also given us time to reflect on what we value in life, the time in isolation provides insight into our previously unsustainable lifestyle as neglected climate and environment. According to Schwab, this can now be corrected:
“The pandemic gives us this chance: it represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine and reset our world.”
The conclusions discuss the somewhat surprising death rate of the pandemic. It is pointed out that COVID-19 until the end of June only killed 0.006% of the world’s population. It should be put in relation to the Black Death (30-40% of the population) and Spanish Disease (2.7% of the population). Corona’s death toll is thus not exactly something that justifies the total shutdown of the world.
We have paid and will have to pay a high price for something that has been exaggerated beyond all proportions and which has been used as a trigger to introduce a new techno-totalitarian order. The tyrants have operated according to the principle of ‘crises open up to business opportunities’ and have been able to effectively capitalise on the suffering they have caused us humans. They also threaten us to come back with their terror if we do not accept their plans to govern and regulate our lives in detail. These are purely mafia-like methods. None of us have chosen Schwab and his friends within the billionaire club to dictate our lives. It is high time to depose the tyrants. Their rightful place is behind bars.
Read full story here…
Sourced from: Technocracy News & Trends
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-09-11--DHS Enters The Bribery Business, Offering Cash Prizes To Come Up With A Better Digital Wallet

Why is everyone trying to convince the public to use digital wallets for everything ?
For years the Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ) has been trying to force Real-ID down Americans throats .
But a recent announcement on their Science and Technology ( S & T ) website revealed just how committed DHS is to tracking every American digitally .
DHS ’ s latest idea is to offer companies a “ Prize Challenge ” to convince the public to use their digital wallet for travel and much more .
By offering corporations money to develop a better digital @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the business of bribery .
Dictionary.com defines bribery “ as the act of giving money ( or something else of value ) to someone to get them to do something you want them to do , especially something they ’ re not supposed to do.
” The Feds should not be offering companies money to design better ways to collect information on the public .
Period .
Americans do not want our government collecting and storing our biometric information .
Companies can submit their designs for a better digital wallet beginning Tuesday 9/8/2020-Thursday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a better digital wallet will allow DHS and the TSA to have easy access to everyone ’ s personal information .
DHS is looking for a UI design that supports best practices for visual consistency , ensures security and privacy , is interoperable , and can be integrated with existing back-end processes .
The UI needs to instill confidence in the user of the digital wallet that their online interactions are secure and that the parties they are interacting with are legitimate .
The goal of this Challenge is to foster better @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by DHS and anyone in the community .
The main reason they are offering a prize challenge is to instill confidence in the public that storing your biometric information on a smartphone is secure .
DHS S & T anticipates the total prize pool is $ 25,000 .
The Challenge will be conducted in two stages .
Stage 1 : Up to three finalists will each receive $ 5,000 .
Stage 1 finalists advance to Stage 2 .
Stage 2 : One grand prize winner will receive an additional $ 10,000 at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DHS ’ s “ judging ” section their new and improved digital wallet must be “ easy-to-use ” and follow the “ World Wide Web Consortium ’ s ” ( WWWC ) guidelines .
The WWWC ’ s origins are highly suspect and scream DHS front company .
According to Wikipedia the WWWC was founded at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Laboratory for Computer Science with support from the European Commission , and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ( DARPA ) .
DARPA ’ s involvement with digital wallets is a huge red-flag @ @ @ @ @ @ @ YOTI are just a few examples of how much personal information , corporations and DHS will store on digital wallets .
A recent news release from YOTI about digital wallets in the United Kingdom proves that they will be used to buy alcohol , rent apartments and much more .
Secondly , the government has signaled that there is legislation in the works to ensure that digital ID can be used as broadly as possible .
We know there are some easy wins for the government , like changing the existing mandatory licensing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to rely on robust , privacy-preserving digital age verification .
In addition , the industry seeks certainty that amendments , such as usage of digital ID for Right to Rent Checks , will continue after the COVID-19 pandemic ends .
With so many red flags about digital wallets , one would do well to ask , do you really want to hand over your biometric identity to the feds ?
Are Americans ready to give up their last remaining vestige of privacy : their biometrics ?
Only time will tell .
Subscribe to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By MassPrivateI
Why is everyone trying to convince the public to use digital wallets for everything?
For years the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been trying to force Real-ID down Americans throats. But a recent announcement on their Science and Technology (S&T) website revealed just how committed DHS is to tracking every American digitally.
DHS’s latest idea is to offer companies a “Prize Challenge” to convince the public to use their digital wallet for travel and much more.
S&T uses prize competitions to invite ideas and solutions directly from the public, or crowd, called crowdsourcing. Prizes enable us to engage citizen-solvers in prize competitions for top ideas and concepts, and breakthroughs in science and technology to help DHS.
By offering corporations money to develop a better digital biometric wallet, DHS has entered into the business of bribery. Dictionary.com defines bribery “as the act of giving money (or something else of value) to someone to get them to do something you want them to do, especially something they’re not supposed to do.”
The Feds should not be offering companies money to design better ways to collect information on the public. Period. Americans do not want our government collecting and storing our biometric information.
Companies can submit their designs for a better digital wallet beginning Tuesday 9/8/2020-Thursday 10/15/2020.
S&T is calling upon innovators to design a better UI for digital wallets. The total prize purse is $25,000. Winning designs will be easy-to-use, trustworthy and improve the overall user experience and management of digital wallet-based credentials.
As the video below explains, a better digital wallet will allow DHS and the TSA to have easy access to everyone’s personal information.
IDEMIA’s digital wallet stores all kinds of personal information
DHS is looking for a UI design that supports best practices for visual consistency, ensures security and privacy, is interoperable, and can be integrated with existing back-end processes. The UI needs to instill confidence in the user of the digital wallet that their online interactions are secure and that the parties they are interacting with are legitimate. The goal of this Challenge is to foster better UIs for digital wallets to be used by DHS and anyone in the community.
Protect Your Privacy with a Phone Shield Faraday Bag
The main reason they are offering a prize challenge is to instill confidence in the public that storing your biometric information on a smartphone is secure.
DHS S&T anticipates the total prize pool is $25,000. The Challenge will be conducted in two stages.
Stage 1: Up to three finalists will each receive $5,000. Stage 1 finalists advance to Stage 2.
Stage 2: One grand prize winner will receive an additional $10,000 at the conclusion of the Challenge.
According to DHS’s “judging” section their new and improved digital wallet must be “easy-to-use” and follow the “World Wide Web Consortium’s” (WWWC) guidelines.
The WWWC’s origins are highly suspect and scream DHS front company.
According to Wikipedia the WWWC was founded at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Laboratory for Computer Science with support from the European Commission, and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). DARPA’s involvement with digital wallets is a huge red-flag.
Companies like IDEMIA, iProov and YOTI are just a few examples of how much personal information, corporations and DHS will store on digital wallets.
A recent news release from YOTI about digital wallets in the United Kingdom proves that they will be used to buy alcohol, rent apartments and much more.
Secondly, the government has signaled that there is legislation in the works to ensure that digital ID can be used as broadly as possible. We know there are some easy wins for the government, like changing the existing mandatory licensing regime for alcohol sales to allow retailers to rely on robust, privacy-preserving digital age verification. In addition, the industry seeks certainty that amendments, such as usage of digital ID for Right to Rent Checks, will continue after the COVID-19 pandemic ends.
With so many red flags about digital wallets, one would do well to ask, do you really want to hand over your biometric identity to the feds?
Are Americans ready to give up their last remaining vestige of privacy: their biometrics? Only time will tell.
Source: MassPrivateI
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-09-12--COVID-911: From Homeland Security to Biosecurity

9/11 , as we were told repeatedly in the days , weeks , and months after the attack , was the day that changed everything .
And now a new event has come along to once again throw the world into chaos .
But whereas the post-9/11 era introduced America to the concept of homeland security , the COVID-19 era is introducing the world to an altogether more abstract concept : biosecurity .
This is the story of the COVID-911 security state .
Watch on Archive / BitChute / LBRY / Minds / YouTube or Download the mp4 For those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ download a smaller , lower file size version of this episode .
For those interested in audio quality , CLICK HERE for the highest-quality version of this episode ( WARNING : very large download ) .
9/11 , as we were told repeatedly in the days , weeks , and months after the attack , was the day that changed everything .
These were no empty words .
They were plain statements of fact .
The world did change on that day .
9/11 was the carte blanche for a Great Reset , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ international relations and domestic affairs .
From the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and the militarization of the police to the multi-trillion dollar wars of aggression to reshape the Middle East , our lives today are drastically different than they were before that fateful Tuesday in September 2001 .
But , nearly two decades later , 9/11 has gone from a touchstone event shaping all of the Western world ’ s national security decisions to a fading cultural memory of a trauma that took place before the newest generation of high @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as if on cue , a new event has come along to throw the world into chaos .
Once again we are being told that the world has changed forever .
And , once again , this is no empty rhetoric .
Governments , businesses and NGOs are now coordinating at the international level on a “ Great Reset ” to once again completely reshape the world we are living in .
Those paying attention will have already noted the parallels between the “ War on Terror ” declared after 9/11 and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” that has been declared on COVID-19 .
In fact , the security imperatives imposed by this pandemic crisis are so similar to those imposed by the terror crisis that , in many cases , the “ new ” security screening tools that are being put into place to combat COVID-19 are openly acknowledged to be mere upgrades of screening tools deployed after 9/11 .
Yes , in some ways the coronavirus security state is merely an extension of the 9/11 security state .
But even more disturbing parallels between 9/11 and COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ level of analysis .
It is true that , just like the response to the 9/11 attacks , the response to the COVID-19 “ crisis ” is being framed in terms of “ security.
” But whereas the post-9/11 era introduced America to the concept of “ Homeland Security ” —security from “ terrorists , ” individuals with identifiable intentions belonging to groups with stated political goals—the COVID-19 era is introducing the world to an altogether more abstract concept : biosecurity .
Originally employed to describe threats to the environment—the introduction of invasive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , or the transmission of infectious diseases among crops and livestock—the term “ biosecurity ” was injected into mainstream political discourse when the 2001 anthrax attacks linked bioterrorism to the global war on terror .
Suddenly , “ biosecurity ” was a pressing national security threat , and an entire architecture of national and international legislation was introduced to institute procedures for implementing medical martial law .
In the US , the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act was passed in multiple state legislatures , giving governors the power to forcibly quarantine and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ event of a declared public health emergency .
On the international level , the World Health Organization adopted the International Health Regulations in 2005 , obligating all 196 WHO member nations to recognize declared “ Public Health Emergencies of International Concern ” like pandemic disease outbreaks as a global threat requiring international cooperation .
Some have even argued that the legislation is broad enough to allow organizations like NATO leeway to enter countries in the interest of “ controlling the outbreak.
” Once again , the tie between this biosecurity paradigm and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In a 2002 paper on the emerging biosecurity field , two US environmental researchers noted the way that 9/11 had opened the door for biosecurity research and legislation .
“ The events of September 11 and subsequent anthrax assaults have made US policymakers and the public more aware of our vulnerability to organisms released with the intent to cause significant harm , ” they wrote .
In 2010 , the World Health Organization issued its own information note on biosecurity , stating that “ The overarching goal of biosecurity is to prevent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and health , ” and—echoing post-9/11 declarations about the need for global cooperation in the War on Terror—that this goal can only be reached through “ a harmonized and integrated biosecurity approach ” based on “ international standards.
” What this predictably bland language obscures is the way that “ biosecurity ” is used to invoke emergency powers and install new security procedures .
Just as the Homeland Security paradigm used the presumed threat of terrorism as an excuse to curtail civil liberties , so , too , does the biosecurity paradigm use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ excuse to curtail civil liberties .
The nightmarish police state that is coming into view on the back of this pandemic panic is not a temporary state of affairs , nor is it a haphazard set of measures thrown together on an ad hoc basis ; it is the creation of a new form of governance .
This new form of governance relies on the perceived sense of crisis—in this case , a public health crisis—to justify constant surveillance of the public and new powers to inhibit the travel of anyone deemed a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Agamben has documented how this biosecurity state is being erected on the back of the panic that 9/11 and the war on terror helped induce in the public .
The parallel nature of 9/11 and COVID-19 as catalyzing events ushering in states of collective panic and , ultimately , new forms of governance , is seen most clearly in the area where these two paradigms overlap : bioterrorism .
The molten steel on the Ground Zero pile had not even cooled before the American public and the people of the world were confronted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a week after 9/11 and continuing for weeks thereafter , a series of letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to media personalities and government officials in an apparent continuation of the terrorist attack on the US .
The letters were quickly tied to both Al Qaeda and Iraq in the mainstream media : The 24/7 coverage of the event in the media ceased abruptly , however , when it was discovered that the strain of anthrax used in the attacks sourced not to Iraq but to the US military ’ s own bioweapons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But this convergence of terrorism and biosecurity did not start with the anthrax attacks .
It began in June of 2001 , a full three months before 9/11 and the declaration of the war on terror itself .
That was when a number of ranking US military and intelligence officials took part in “ Dark Winter , ” a high-level exercise that simulated the US ’ response to a smallpox attack on the homeland by bioterrorists .
The drill , co-hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security , took place at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and 23rd of June , 2001 , and even involved fake news reports that were broadcast to the participants as the simulation unfolded .
In an incredible parallel , the same Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security that co-hosted Dark Winter also co-hosted “ Event 201 , ” a simulation of a globally spreading novel coronavirus pandemic that was held in New York just months before the declaration of the globally spreading novel coronavirus pandemic that hailed the advent of the era of biosecurity .
This exercise similarly involved fake news broadcasts : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that were involved in the promotion of the bioterror scare under the old “ homeland security ” paradigm have been influential in promoting the COVID-19 scare under the new “ biosecurity ” paradigm .
The phrase “ homeland security ” itself was popularized in Washington in the late 1990s and capitalized on by the ANSER Institute , which formed an Institute for Homeland Security in 1999 led by Randall Larsen , a professor and department chair at the National War College .
The Institute prepared a course on “ Homeland Security ” which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his National War College colleague , Robert Kadlec .
Coincidentally , the course was slated to begin on September 11 , 2001 .
Part of the course syllabus included a review of the Dark Winter exercise , which the Institute for Homeland Security co-created .
The name “ Dark Winter ” derives from a statement made by Larsen ’ s colleague , Robert Kadlec , credited as a “ Bio-Warfare Defense Expert ” during the exercise ’ s fake news broadcast .
A career officer and physician in the United States Air Force @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the FBI ’ s investigation of the 2001 anthrax attacks , and then serve in several key biosecurity-related roles in the George W. Bush White House .
During this time , Kadlec helped draft the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act .
Passed by Congress in 2006 , the act greatly expanded federal power during public health emergencies and consolidated many of these powers in a new office , the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response ( ASPR ) .
Then , in what Kadlec has called “ just a coincidence , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2017 .
In his role as ASPR , Kadlec oversaw a joint exercise in 2019 named “ Crimson Contagion.
” The drill included the National Security Council , the Pentagon , the Department of Homeland Security and a raft of other government agencies and simulated the US government ’ s response to a viral pandemic originating in China and spreading around the globe .
Like Dark Winter , the “ Crimson Contagion ” exercise took place just months before the events it was simulating began to play out in real life .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ gave participants like Kadlec the chance to argue that biosecurity was a pressing national security challenge that the country was ill-prepared to meet—an argument that he made to Congress with Dr. Anthony Fauci by his side just one week before the first reports of the novel coronavirus spreading in China .
Then there ’ s Donald Rumsfeld .
As Secretary of Defense in the first term of the George W. Bush administration , there are few people more closely associated with the “ War on Terror.
” Rumsfeld , too , has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for decades .
In the 1980s he personally participated in secret meetings with Saddam Hussein that resulted in anthrax , botulism , and other chemical weapons being sent from the US to Iraq .
In the 1990s he was named chairman of Gilead Sciences , a California biotech company that profited handsomely from the scramble for Tamiflu during the bird flu scare of 2005 and which is currently profiting handsomely from Remdesivir as a result of the COVID-19 scare .
There are many others whose careers blaze the same trail , transitioning seamlessly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ biosecurity state .
People like Dr. Richard Hatchett , who served as Director for Biodefense Policy under George W. Bush , then as acting Director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority ( BARDA ) , and acting Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response within HHS before becoming the CEO of CEPI , the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation co-founded Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations .
In his position as “ global health expert , ” Hatchett made waves back in March for his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That so many of the people who were there at the birth of the war on terror are currently acting as midwives to the biosecurity state should come as no surprise .
After all , the biosecurity paradigm is not a replacement for the terror paradigm ; it is its fulfillment .
The war on terror imagined a covert army of foreign invaders slipping through the defenses of the Homeland and commandeering the resources of the body politic to wreak internal havoc .
The biosecurity state posits largely the same scenario , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ terrorists ” possessed with a “ hatred of freedom , ” they are “ asymptomatic carriers ” possessed by a pathogen .
Just as the Homeland Security forces and border security agents were entrusted to protect us from the terrorists , now the “ front line heroes , ” doctors and nurses armed with the tools of the technocratic priest class , can protect us from the invisible enemy .
This speaks to an important aspect of the biosecurity state : ultimately , it is not about health .
It is about politics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this turn of events from Giorgio Agamben , who has noted that viral epidemics are Governments are banning gatherings and events .
Instituting new screening procedures .
Quarantining healthy , functioning people against their will .
Tracking and surveilling every individual .
Controlling their movements .
Monitoring their transactions .
Make no mistake : the “ War on Terror ” is not over .
It has just greatly expanded .
The proponents of 9/11 truth have warned for 19 years that the “ War on Terror ” was always a war on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the political debate , that viewpoint has been vindicated as the “ terrorist ” label is replaced by the “ asymptomatic carrier ” label and all the machinery of the police state is wielded against everyone who opposes the biosecurity takeover .
Given that those once derided as “ conspiracy theorists ” have turned out to be the most prescient political observers of all , perhaps it is time to learn the real lessons from 9/11 that mainstream discourse has always excluded : • That 9/11 and the “ War on Terror @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but a power grab ; • That the “ temporary ” measures brought in to deal with an alleged “ emergency ” will never be relinquished ; • And , most importantly , that unless everyone who cares about this—the most blatant power grab in history—rises up , refuses to cower in fear of the invisible enemy , and reclaims their inalienable rights to freedom of movement , freedom of association and freedom of assembly , then those freedoms will be gone for good .
This is the message of 9/11 truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ giving up their rights in the name of an endless parade of bogeymen .
In reality , it was the very politicians and officials claiming to protect us from these bogeymen—the ones donning the mantle of “ homeland security ” —who were the greatest threat to the public .
And now they are claiming we are the bogeymen , “ asymptomatic carriers ” of an invisible enemy , ” walking and talking weapons of mass destruction who must be caged in fear forever lest the virus kills us all .
This is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fearmogers are themselves afraid of : free humanity .
Gathering .
Talking .
Working .
Playing .
Living .
It is no small irony that this year ’ s 9/11 memorials have been disrupted by the COVID scare .
The torch has well and truly passed , and the annual injunctions to “ Never Forget ” have been replaced by a litany of “ Always Remembers.
” Remember to wear your mask .
Remember to stay 6 feet apart .
Remember to avoid large groups .
Remember to stay home .
After 19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ admit that 9/11 truth failed to expose the “ War on Terror ” lie in time to derail the homeland security agenda .
But we are entering a new era , and we have a new chance to wake from this nightmare .
Knowing this , the only question is : Will we reject the “ War on the Invisible Enemy ” before it ’ s too late ?
Whatever our choice , we better make it quickly .
A Great Reset is coming .
Visit James Corbett at CorbettReport.com .
Subscribe to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and support him on Patreon .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By The Corbett Report
9/11, as we were told repeatedly in the days, weeks, and months after the attack, was the day that changed everything. And now a new event has come along to once again throw the world into chaos.
But whereas the post-9/11 era introduced America to the concept of homeland security, the COVID-19 era is introducing the world to an altogether more abstract concept: biosecurity.
This is the story of the COVID-911 security state.
Watch on Archive / BitChute / LBRY / Minds / YouTube or Download the mp4
For those with limited bandwidth, CLICK HERE to download a smaller, lower file size version of this episode.
For those interested in audio quality, CLICK HERE for the highest-quality version of this episode (WARNING: very large download).
TRANSCRIPT
9/11, as we were told repeatedly in the days, weeks, and months after the attack, was the day that changed everything.
NARRATOR: In the span of one devastating morning, America changed forever. SOURCE: Remembering 9/11: Never Quit
KATIE COURIC: Good morning. America may never be the same and this is why. SOURCE: Today Show – September 12, 2001
LOU WATERS: American life will change forever as a result of this attack. SOURCE: CNN on September 12, 2001
REPORTER: Nothing will ever be the same again. SOURCE: Inside Edition – A Look Back at 9/11
JAMES ROBBINS: Nothing will ever be quite the same again. SOURCE: 9/11 the day after – BBC1 Nightly News
TOM BROKAW: Life will never be quite the same. SOURCE: Dateline NBC – Sept. 18, 2001
These were no empty words. They were plain statements of fact. The world did change on that day.
9/11 was the carte blanche for a Great Reset, the institution of a new normal in international relations and domestic affairs. From the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and the militarization of the police to the multi-trillion dollar wars of aggression to reshape the Middle East, our lives today are drastically different than they were before that fateful Tuesday in September 2001.
GEORGE W. BUSH: On September the 11th, enemies of freedom committed an act of war against our country. [. . .] All of this was brought upon us in a single day — and night fell on a different world, a world where freedom itself is under attack. SOURCE: Sept. 20, 2001 – Bush Declares War on Terror
TONY BLAIR: If September the 11th hadn’t happened, our assessment of the risk of allowing Saddam—any possibility of him reconstituting his programs—would not have been the same. SOURCE: IRAQ INQUIRY / TONY BLAIR / 9 11 CHANGED EVERYTHING
BUSH: For the first time, airport security will become a direct federal responsibility. SOURCE: Bush signs aviation security legislation
JOHN TYNER: I don’t understand how a sexual assault can be made a condition of my flying. TSA AGENT: This is not considered a sexual assault TYNER: It would be if you were not the government. SOURCE: Airport Body Scans Debated
CENK UYGUR: The old fact sheet said the primary function of the FBI is law enforcement. That makes sense. That’s what we grew up with. The new fact sheet says the primary function of the FBI is national security. SOURCE: Think The FBI Is About ‘Law Enforcement’? Guess Again


activistpost--2020-09-12--9/11: Top 3 Ways Government Has Made Things Worse

Surveillance , war and massive government spending – top 3 ways government keeps making things worse and worse since the tragedy of 9/11 .
• How 9/11 Changed the Course of Personal Data Collection and Surveillance • New Report Finds ‘ War on Terror ’ Has Forced 37 Million People to Flee Their Homes • United States Budgetary Costs and Obligations of Post-9/11 Wars through FY2020 : $ 6.4 Trillion • Since 9/11 , the Government ’ s Answer to Every Problem Has Been More Government • 9-11 : Fear is the Foundation of Most Governments Michael Boldin [ send @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Tenth Amendment Center .
He was raised in Milwaukee , WI , and currently resides in Los Angeles , CA .
Follow him on twitter – @ michaelboldin and Facebook .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Michael Boldin
Surveillance, war and massive government spending – top 3 ways government keeps making things worse and worse since the tragedy of 9/11.
Path to Liberty: September 11, 2020
SHOW LINKS:
Subscribe: iTunes | Spotify | Podbean | Google | Stitcher | TuneIn | RSS
Source: Tenth Amendment Center
Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter – @michaelboldin and Facebook.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-09-12--Study Proves Government Wrong on 9/11 and 3rd Building Collapse

Scientists at the University of Alaska conducted a $ 300,000 study which proves that the government ’ s conclusions provided @ @ @ @ @ on 9/11 are wrong .
“ A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade @ @ @ @ @ after more than 4 years of research and provides a much better explanation of what @ @ @ @ @ Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the @ @ @ @ @ freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds @ @ @ @ @ , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of @ @ @ @

By Ben Swann
Scientists at the University of Alaska conducted a $300,000 study which proves that the government’s conclusions provided by NIST about what happened on 9/11 are wrong.
“A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7” was released after more than 4 years of research and provides a much better explanation of what actually happened.
Ben Swann’s report below originally aired in 2019:
ISE.Media: https://ISE.Media
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-09-12--Derrick Broze Interview — Journalist Detained At The Border Without Charge & CBP Allows Pet To Die

By The Last American Vagabond Joining me today is the founder of The Conscious Resistance , activist , researcher and @ @ @ @ @ is here today to discuss an experience he recently had while trying to cross the @ @ @ @ @ gives us some alarming insight into the growing authoritarian nature of our government .
Visit @ @ @ @ @ ’ s independent news broadcast on YouTube or iTunes .
Follow on Facebook , Twitter @ @ @ @ @ at Patreon or PayPal .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and @ @ @ @ @ to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , @ @ @ @ @ , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s @ @ @ @ @ issue of Counter Markets today .

By The Last American Vagabond
Joining me today is the founder of The Conscious Resistance, activist, researcher and author Derrick Broze. He is here today to discuss an experience he recently had while trying to cross the border, and why it gives us some alarming insight into the growing authoritarian nature of our government.
IN-SHADOW: A Modern Odyssey – Animated Short Film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j800S… https://www.facebook.com/236332345373… https://www.aclu.org/other/constituti…
Derrick’s Links: www.theconsciousresistance.com www.theconsciousresistance.com/trojanhorse (5G doc) www.theconsciousresistance.com/howto (book) www.freedomcells.org (freedom cells site) https://www.minds.com/derrickbroze/ https://twitter.com/DBrozeLiveFree https://twitter.com/TheConsciousRN
Visit TheLastAmericanVagabond.com. Subscribe to TLAV’s independent news broadcast on YouTube or iTunes. Follow on Facebook, Twitter, and Minds. Support at Patreon or PayPal.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-09-12--Walmart Launches “Drone Delivery” As Last-Mile Delivery War Heats Up

Walmart has partnered with Flytrex , an end-to-end drone delivery company , to launch an on-demand drone delivery service at one of it Supercenters in Fayetteville , North Carolina , this week .
The unveiling of this new rapid last-mile delivery service comes a little more than one week after the company officially unveiled Walmart+ , an alternative to Amazon Prime .
The new service , launched on Wednesday , will allow drones to deliver select products , such as groceries and essential items , Senior Vice President for Consumer Product Tom Ward wrote in a blog post on Walmart.com @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic , remote-working , and eruption of e-commerce shopping , last-mile deliver wars between Walmart and Amazon appear to be developing .
In August , we noted Amazon was cleared by the FAA to test drone deliveries .
Flytrex ’ s automated drones can fly hundreds of feet in the air at 32 mph , with a distance of about 6.2 miles .
Each drone has a maximum cargo load capacity of about 6.6 pounds , allowing overweight Americans to order corndogs and Twinkies on demand .
“ We know that it will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of packages delivered via drone , ” Ward said in the post .
“ That still feels like a bit of science fiction , but we ’ re at a point where we ’ re learning more and more about the technology that is available and how we can use it to make our customers ’ lives easier.
” A demo video was published on Walmart ’ s blog , showing the drone loaded with a customer ’ s order , then flying across a suburban neighborhood , delivering the package to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ received FAA approval last year to deliver goods in North Carolina .
Walmart is joining an elite club of companies that are exploring drone programs for last-mile delivery .
Those companies are Amazon , CVS , UPS , and Wing , an Alphabet Inc subsidiary .
“ At the end of the day , it ’ s learnings from pilots such as this that will help shape the potential of drone delivery on a larger scale and , true to the vision of our founder , take Walmart beyond where we ’ ve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blog post .
In a contactless environment , propelled by the virus pandemic , drones appear to be the best means of transportation for last-mile deliveries by mega-US corporations .
As for all the airline pilots who are getting laid off – your next calling could be a Walmart drone pilot .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Tyler Durden
Walmart has partnered with Flytrex, an end-to-end drone delivery company, to launch an on-demand drone delivery service at one of it Supercenters in Fayetteville, North Carolina, this week. The unveiling of this new rapid last-mile delivery service comes a little more than one week after the company officially unveiled Walmart+, an alternative to Amazon Prime.
The new service, launched on Wednesday, will allow drones to deliver select products, such as groceries and essential items, Senior Vice President for Consumer Product Tom Ward wrote in a blog post on Walmart.com.
In an era of a virus pandemic, remote-working, and eruption of e-commerce shopping, last-mile deliver wars between Walmart and Amazon appear to be developing. In August, we noted Amazon was cleared by the FAA to test drone deliveries.
Flytrex’s automated drones can fly hundreds of feet in the air at 32 mph, with a distance of about 6.2 miles. Each drone has a maximum cargo load capacity of about 6.6 pounds, allowing overweight Americans to order corndogs and Twinkies on demand.
“We know that it will be some time before we see millions of packages delivered via drone,” Ward said in the post. “That still feels like a bit of science fiction, but we’re at a point where we’re learning more and more about the technology that is available and how we can use it to make our customers’ lives easier.”
A demo video was published on Walmart’s blog, showing the drone loaded with a customer’s order, then flying across a suburban neighborhood, delivering the package to the customer’s front yard. Flytrex received FAA approval last year to deliver goods in North Carolina.
Walmart is joining an elite club of companies that are exploring drone programs for last-mile delivery. Those companies are Amazon, CVS, UPS, and Wing, an Alphabet Inc subsidiary.
“At the end of the day, it’s learnings from pilots such as this that will help shape the potential of drone delivery on a larger scale and, true to the vision of our founder, take Walmart beyond where we’ve been,” Ward said in the blog post.
In a contactless environment, propelled by the virus pandemic, drones appear to be the best means of transportation for last-mile deliveries by mega-US corporations.
As for all the airline pilots who are getting laid off – your next calling could be a Walmart drone pilot.
Source: Zerohedge.com
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


activistpost--2020-09-11--Economic War With China Is The Final Step Before The “Great Reset”

With the pandemic dominating the news cycle , the general public has been completely distracted from a much more important crisis ; namely , the economic crisis .
To be sure , economic decay is not as swift or exciting , but I doubt that ’ s why the mainstream media mostly ignores the issue .
From my experience , the media tends to omit coverage of the things they don ’ t want the population to notice or think about .
Right now , the only word spoken on the economy is “ recovery ” .
Of course , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recent articles , you know that the recovery narrative is nonsense .
With the small business sector on the verge of collapse , the U.S. economy has no means to recover unless we see a sudden resurgence in industrial production and domestic factories built , and with corporate debt at historic highs , there ’ s simply no money for that right now .
Good luck trying to bankroll a manufacturing renaissance in the middle of a stagflationary environment .
That ’ s not to say that the rest of the world is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suffers from the added weight of its past financial and monetary “ success ” .
Let me explain… Recent generations have grown up conditioned to believe that , through the power of central bank fiat currency , all problems can be solved .
There has even been a concerted effort within the media to support this lie .
Remember when propaganda rags like The Atlantic claimed that central bankers like Ben Bernanke were “ the real heroes ” saving the economy ?
That ’ s the narrative young adults and investors today have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they believe it is another matter , but as we can see in the world of Robinhood stock trading , there has been little concern for the concept of “ bubble markets ” .
These kids think that the party is eternal because they are backstopped by the Fed , and there ’ s a lot of shoe-shine boys in the media telling them they are right .
However , what they are not being told is that we are in the middle of a collapse dynamic , and the structures they view @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to history , here ’ s how this usually works : Investment chases profits , and market profits can be a self-fulfilling prophecy for a little while , as central banks inflate the money supply .
But eventually , the piper has to be paid .
Without a sound economic foundation , including strong production , strong wages , sound money , easily managed debt and prosecution of corruption , the system can not hold together no matter how much capital is floating through the financial structure and no matter how much stimulus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There has NEVER been a stimulus effort that actually saved an economy for the long term .
In fact , massive stimulus actions always contribute to greater destabilization of the economy over time .
This was true for the Weimar Republic in Germany and it ’ s true in America today .
If you want to destroy a nation , let it print itself into oblivion .
The Federal Reserve knows full well that all they are doing with stimulus measures is delaying the inevitable .
And , I don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic and the “ Great Reset ” in full swing , the central bankers have done the job they were tasked to do , which was to undermine the financial system , leaving it open to broad instability and self destruction .
All that is left is for the banks is to conjure enough scapegoats to avoid being blamed for the fallout .
Then , just like the 2008 bubble implosion , the establishment elites can swoop in to “ save the day ” with a new system of their choosing and be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very media conglomerates they own a stake in .
Become an Activist Post Patron for $ 1 per month at Patreon .
To be clear , China is not innocent in any of this , and those who claim they are victims of globalists have no understanding of the long-running relationship the Chinese have had with Western elites .
By extension , the people who think that our economic war with China is somehow legitimate and that China is going to be “ punished ” for their trespasses are fooling themselves .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ China ; it is designed to offer further distraction as well as a scapegoat event for the economic collapse the central banks originally created .
China ’ s ties to the IMF , their involvement in building a cashless society , their participation in digital currency frameworks , etc.
, all lead me to believe that they intend to have a large seat at the table of the “ Great Reset ” .
With the amount of capital and technology being funneled into China the past two decades , I would not count @ @ @ @ @ @ @ destroy their new favorite economic engine .
What I would count on is for the current tensions with China to be increased dramatically in the next year .
It seems to me that the pandemic and the riots are not quite enough to send the U.S. population begging for help from those at the World Economic Forum or the IMF .
They need another crisis , and China can provide them with one .
We are already seeing the signs , as China has recently threatened to dump all their U.S. Treasury holdings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is an outcome I have been warning about since 2008 .
China has been preparing for a full decoupling from the dollar system for over a decade .
It ’ s an outcome the majority of analysts claim is impossible , but they don ’ t understand what is really happening here .
The World Economic Forum talks constantly about the “ reset ” , but it is important to examine what this entails .
One of the primary goals of this new world order is a single international monetary system ; they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and most likely they want it managed by the IMF .
The next step in achieving this objective is to sabotage the existing financial order so that the public , desperate for stability , demands a replacement .
This means taking down the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency .
Through confrontation with China , this can be done .
It ’ s not only the threat of China dumping U.S. debt , it ’ s about China , the largest importer/exporter in the world , no longer using the dollar as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this step , then many of their trading partners will follow their lead .
This will probably result in a currency basket system moderated by the IMF being used to replace the dollar in international trade .
That doesn ’ t mean the dollar will disappear , it will just lose a large portion of its buying power .
This means trillions of dollars that are held overseas will flood back into the U.S. through various channels .
Hyperinflation will result , the global economy will take a hit , but the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will all be blamed on Trump and the trade war .
But how could this endgame be assured ?
Well , with Robert Lighthizer in charge of trade policy and Wilber Ross as Commerce Secretary , I see no reason why the elites can ’ t maneuver the situation however they please .
But the final outcome is still out of their hands .
They are seeking to exploit crisis events as opportunities to push their agenda .
They openly admit to it .
But they can not control how the public reacts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American response to pandemic lockdowns has not been what they hoped .
They are scrambling to get us to conform completely to the “ new normal ” , and millions upon millions of us are not doing it .
In a country where there are more guns than people , enforcing such measures will be difficult .
That said , our economic situation remains tenuous .
This is why we must prepare with localized trade , local sound money and local production .
Without an alternative system in place it will be much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trappings of the reset .
This article was written by Brandon Smith and originally published at Birch Gold Group Brandon Smith has been an alternative economic and geopolitical analyst since 2006 and is the founder of Alt-Market.com .
With global tensions spiking , thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401 ( k ) into an IRA backed by physical gold .
Now , thanks to a little-known IRS Tax Law , you can too .
Learn how with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group .
It reveals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ savings , and how to open a Gold IRA .
Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold .
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth , peace , and freedom news .
Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE !
Follow us on SoMee , HIVE , Parler , Flote , Minds , and Twitter .
Provide , Protect and Profit from what ’ s coming !
Get a free issue of Counter Markets today .

By Brandon Smith
With the pandemic dominating the news cycle, the general public has been completely distracted from a much more important crisis; namely, the economic crisis. To be sure, economic decay is not as swift or exciting, but I doubt that’s why the mainstream media mostly ignores the issue. From my experience, the media tends to omit coverage of the things they don’t want the population to notice or think about.
Right now, the only word spoken on the economy is “recovery”. Of course, if you’ve been reading my recent articles, you know that the recovery narrative is nonsense. With the small business sector on the verge of collapse, the U.S. economy has no means to recover unless we see a sudden resurgence in industrial production and domestic factories built, and with corporate debt at historic highs, there’s simply no money for that right now. Good luck trying to bankroll a manufacturing renaissance in the middle of a stagflationary environment.
That’s not to say that the rest of the world is much better off, but the U.S. suffers from the added weight of its past financial and monetary “success”. Let me explain…
Recent generations have grown up conditioned to believe that, through the power of central bank fiat currency, all problems can be solved. There has even been a concerted effort within the media to support this lie. Remember when propaganda rags like The Atlantic claimed that central bankers like Ben Bernanke were “the real heroes” saving the economy?
That’s the narrative young adults and investors today have grown up with. Now, whether they believe it is another matter, but as we can see in the world of Robinhood stock trading, there has been little concern for the concept of “bubble markets”. These kids think that the party is eternal because they are backstopped by the Fed, and there’s a lot of shoe-shine boys in the media telling them they are right. However, what they are not being told is that we are in the middle of a collapse dynamic, and the structures they view as reliable are now crumbling.
According to history, here’s how this usually works: Investment chases profits, and market profits can be a self-fulfilling prophecy for a little while, as central banks inflate the money supply. But eventually, the piper has to be paid. Without a sound economic foundation, including strong production, strong wages, sound money, easily managed debt and prosecution of corruption, the system cannot hold together no matter how much capital is floating through the financial structure and no matter how much stimulus is being pumped out by central banks.
There has NEVER been a stimulus effort that actually saved an economy for the long term. In fact, massive stimulus actions always contribute to greater destabilization of the economy over time. This was true for the Weimar Republic in Germany and it’s true in America today. If you want to destroy a nation, let it print itself into oblivion.
The Federal Reserve knows full well that all they are doing with stimulus measures is delaying the inevitable. And, I don’t think they really care. With the pandemic and the “Great Reset” in full swing, the central bankers have done the job they were tasked to do, which was to undermine the financial system, leaving it open to broad instability and self destruction.
All that is left is for the banks is to conjure enough scapegoats to avoid being blamed for the fallout. Then, just like the 2008 bubble implosion, the establishment elites can swoop in to “save the day” with a new system of their choosing and be heralded as “heroes” by the very media conglomerates they own a stake in.
Enter the trade war…
Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.
To be clear, China is not innocent in any of this, and those who claim they are victims of globalists have no understanding of the long-running relationship the Chinese have had with Western elites. By extension, the people who think that our economic war with China is somehow legitimate and that China is going to be “punished” for their trespasses are fooling themselves.
The trade war is not designed to punish China; it is designed to offer further distraction as well as a scapegoat event for the economic collapse the central banks originally created. China’s ties to the IMF, their involvement in building a cashless society, their participation in digital currency frameworks, etc., all lead me to believe that they intend to have a large seat at the table of the “Great Reset”. With the amount of capital and technology being funneled into China the past two decades, I would not count on the establishment to then try to destroy their new favorite economic engine.
What I would count on is for the current tensions with China to be increased dramatically in the next year. It seems to me that the pandemic and the riots are not quite enough to send the U.S. population begging for help from those at the World Economic Forum or the IMF. They need another crisis, and China can provide them with one.
We are already seeing the signs, as China has recently threatened to dump all their U.S. Treasury holdings if conflict continues to escalate; this is an outcome I have been warning about since 2008. China has been preparing for a full decoupling from the dollar system for over a decade. It’s an outcome the majority of analysts claim is impossible, but they don’t understand what is really happening here.
The World Economic Forum talks constantly about the “reset”, but it is important to examine what this entails. One of the primary goals of this new world order is a single international monetary system; they want that system to be digital, and most likely they want it managed by the IMF. The next step in achieving this objective is to sabotage the existing financial order so that the public, desperate for stability, demands a replacement. This means taking down the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency.
Through confrontation with China, this can be done. It’s not only the threat of China dumping U.S. debt, it’s about China, the largest importer/exporter in the world, no longer using the dollar as the reserve currency. If they take this step, then many of their trading partners will follow their lead. This will probably result in a currency basket system moderated by the IMF being used to replace the dollar in international trade. That doesn’t mean the dollar will disappear, it will just lose a large portion of its buying power.
This means trillions of dollars that are held overseas will flood back into the U.S. through various channels. Hyperinflation will result, the global economy will take a hit, but the U.S. will be hit hardest. And it will all be blamed on Trump and the trade war.
But how could this endgame be assured? Well, with Robert Lighthizer in charge of trade policy and Wilber Ross as Commerce Secretary, I see no reason why the elites can’t maneuver the situation however they please. But the final outcome is still out of their hands. They are seeking to exploit crisis events as opportunities to push their agenda. They openly admit to it. But they cannot control how the public reacts. So far, I think the American response to pandemic lockdowns has not been what they hoped. They are scrambling to get us to conform completely to the “new normal”, and millions upon millions of us are not doing it. In a country where there are more guns than people, enforcing such measures will be difficult.
That said, our economic situation remains tenuous. This is why we must prepare with localized trade, local sound money and local production. Without an alternative system in place it will be much harder for people to rebel against the trappings of the reset.
This article was written by Brandon Smith and originally published at Birch Gold Group
Brandon Smith has been an alternative economic and geopolitical analyst since 2006 and is the founder of Alt-Market.com.
With global tensions spiking, thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401(k) into an IRA backed by physical gold. Now, thanks to a little-known IRS Tax Law, you can too. Learn how with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group. It reveals how physical precious metals can protect your savings, and how to open a Gold IRA. Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold.
Become a Patron!
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Send resources to the front lines of peace and freedom HERE! Follow us on SoMee, HIVE, Parler, Flote, Minds, and Twitter.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.