therightscoop--2020-09-24--“BIDEN 2020” – Home of Trump supporters targeted, three cars and garage TORCHED and destroyed over T

“BIDEN 2020” – Home of Trump supporters targeted, three cars and garage TORCHED and destroyed over Trump sign

The home of a Minnesota family who supports President Trump was despicably targeted by Biden thugs this week who set their cars on fire and burned down their detached garage : Federal authorities are helping investigate a suspicious fire at a home in Brooklyn Center , Minnesota that had a large “ Trump 2020 ” sign .
Police and firefighters were called to the home on the 6900 block of Morgan Avenue North shortly before 4 a.m. Wednesday on a report of an explosion , according to the Brooklyn Center Police Department .
Firefighters quickly extinguished the fire , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were destroyed as well as a large “ Trump 2020 ” sign .
Luckily , no one was injured .
Security footage shows the moments homeowners Dennis and Deana Molla ran outside to find their garage and several cars on fire .
“ If we didn ’ t wake up , I feel it could have gotten to our house , ” Dennis said .
Police also said officers noticed fresh spray paint on the garage that included “ Biden 2020 ” , “ BLM ” and a capitol letter “ A ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ symbol for “ anarchy ” – before the garage burned down .
“ We live in the greatest country in the world and the greatest thing about America is we have the right to say what we want to say and not be attacked for it , and that ’ s totally been violated , ” Deana added .
The couple said this is the first time they ’ ve ever put a political sign up , and with two small children at home , they say this likely is the last time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because of the flag , I wouldn ’ t have gotten it .
I don ’ t want to deal with this at all , ” Dennis said .
The Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco , Firearms and Explosives and the FBI are helping investigate the fire , which authorities have deemed suspicious .

The home of a Minnesota family who supports President Trump was despicably targeted by Biden thugs this week who set their cars on fire and burned down their detached garage:
Here’s more from Fox 9:
Federal authorities are helping investigate a suspicious fire at a home in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that had a large “Trump 2020” sign.
Police and firefighters were called to the home on the 6900 block of Morgan Avenue North shortly before 4 a.m. Wednesday on a report of an explosion, according to the Brooklyn Center Police Department. Firefighters quickly extinguished the fire, but a detached three-car garage and three vehicles were destroyed as well as a large “Trump 2020” sign. Luckily, no one was injured.
Security footage shows the moments homeowners Dennis and Deana Molla ran outside to find their garage and several cars on fire.
“If we didn’t wake up, I feel it could have gotten to our house,” Dennis said.
Police also said officers noticed fresh spray paint on the garage that included “Biden 2020”, “BLM” and a capitol letter “A” with a circle around it – a symbol for “anarchy” – before the garage burned down.
“We live in the greatest country in the world and the greatest thing about America is we have the right to say what we want to say and not be attacked for it, and that’s totally been violated,” Deana added.
The couple said this is the first time they’ve ever put a political sign up, and with two small children at home, they say this likely is the last time.
“If It’s really because of the flag, I wouldn’t have gotten it. I don’t want to deal with this at all,” Dennis said.
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the FBI are helping investigate the fire, which authorities have deemed suspicious.


therightscoop--2020-09-24--[VIDEO]: Biden supporters throw TANTRUM when President Trump shows up to pay respects to Ginsburg

This morning President Trump and the First Lady paid their respects to Ruth Bader Ginsburg as she lie in repose @ @ @ @ @ But Biden supporters refused to let them do it in peace : The crowd of @ @ @ @ @ boo as the President and First Lady stood there silently .
They then began to @ @ @ @ @ ’ , referring to the alleged deathbed statement from RBG on waiting until a new @ @ @ @ @ her replacement .
The whole scene was disgusting .
Here ’ s a few responses @

This morning President Trump and the First Lady paid their respects to Ruth Bader Ginsburg as she lie in repose at the Supreme Court. But Biden supporters refused to let them do it in peace:
President Trump went to pay his respects to Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Leftists threw a tantrum. How disrespectful… pic.twitter.com/J9JWlzhzjh — Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 24, 2020
The crowd of disrespectful Biden supporters started to boo as the President and First Lady stood there silently.
They then began to chant ‘honor her wish’, referring to the alleged deathbed statement from RBG on waiting until a new president is installed to appoint her replacement.
The whole scene was disgusting. Here’s a few responses:
This is genuinely gross Something is wrong with the left https://t.co/eqnwESmCcR — Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) September 24, 2020
These same people would also be pretending to be outraged if he hadn't done it. Toxic partisanship is a societal cancer. https://t.co/lQCXbdHqWR — Jeff Charles, Black Maverick (@JeffOnTheRight) September 24, 2020
When Trump didn't go to John Lewis's funeral the left complained. He's dammed if he does, dammed if he doesn't. https://t.co/U2dbduJJeL — Sam Jonesy (@JonesyLaird) September 24, 2020
It's an awful look and sound. It is also true that it is politically helpful for Republicans when the left behaves so crazily for all to see, and not just because it reminds Americans of what was done to Justice Kavanaugh and his family. https://t.co/1Gc6qjjoRw — Mollie (@MZHemingway) September 24, 2020
Sounds like Demons Screaming from Hell. https://t.co/2ITBl8u8ZM — Jenn Jordan (@Jennlovesjeff) September 24, 2020


therightscoop--2020-09-24--[VIDEO] BLM thugs harass white couple at outdoor restaurant, threaten to KNOCK THEM OUT

Black Lives Matter thugs harassed a white couple at an outdoor restaurant last night in Florida , sitting down at their table and threatening to “ knock out ” the “ old-ass boyfriend ” : Here ’ s more from the NY Post : Protesters inflamed by the decision not to charge cops for Breonna Taylor ’ s death took their anger out on a couple dining in Florida — gatecrashing their table and threatening to knock the man the “ f–k out.
” A man clutching a skateboard was filmed by a Tampa Bay Times reporter as he strolled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their outdoor table as dozens chanted at the edge of the St. Petersburg restaurant .
“ No !
This is my table , ” the female diner told him , trying to push him from the chair — only to have three other protesters stroll over and join them .
The male diner hugged his wife as she said she was calling the police — as the initial dinner-crasher and another woman started hurling abuse .
“ I ought to knock your old-ass boyfriend the f–k out , ” the man threatened , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ wild Karen in her natural f–king habitat.
” The threatened man was filmed smiling in bemusement , as more protesters appeared to gather around the table — including one continually blowing a horn .
The video quickly went viral , getting more than 1.8 million views on Twitter in less than 12 hours .
Reporter Josh Fiallo , who filmed the clip , said some diners had “ yelled back ” at protesters , “ starting multiple confrontations , ” but he was not sure why the couple filmed were targeted .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and because they were white .
Of this I have no doubt .
Something similar happened at a restaurant in DC where patrons were harassed by the mob : And it got worse :

Black Lives Matter thugs harassed a white couple at an outdoor restaurant last night in Florida, sitting down at their table and threatening to “knock out” the “old-ass boyfriend”:
Protestors are now going restaurant by restaurant to chant at diners on Beach Dr. in St. Pete. A lot of diners yelled back, starting multiple confrontations. This one was the most significant. Protestors took over a couple’s table. Not sure why they were targeted specifically. pic.twitter.com/dzLM7KuCW9 — Josh Fiallo (@ByJoshFiallo) September 24, 2020
Here’s more from the NY Post:
Protesters inflamed by the decision not to charge cops for Breonna Taylor’s death took their anger out on a couple dining in Florida — gatecrashing their table and threatening to knock the man the “f–k out.” A man clutching a skateboard was filmed by a Tampa Bay Times reporter as he strolled up and sat with the couple at their outdoor table as dozens chanted at the edge of the St. Petersburg restaurant. “No! This is my table,” the female diner told him, trying to push him from the chair — only to have three other protesters stroll over and join them. The male diner hugged his wife as she said she was calling the police — as the initial dinner-crasher and another woman started hurling abuse. “I ought to knock your old-ass boyfriend the f–k out,” the man threatened, as he derided the woman as a “wild Karen in her natural f–king habitat.” The threatened man was filmed smiling in bemusement, as more protesters appeared to gather around the table — including one continually blowing a horn. The video quickly went viral, getting more than 1.8 million views on Twitter in less than 12 hours. Reporter Josh Fiallo, who filmed the clip, said some diners had “yelled back” at protesters, “starting multiple confrontations,” but he was not sure why the couple filmed were targeted.
They were targeted because they were there and because they were white. Of this I have no doubt.
Something similar happened at a restaurant in DC where patrons were harassed by the mob:
Black Lives Matter activists harass restaurant patrons in Washington DC. This is the new normal. pic.twitter.com/roYDrHMPgY — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 24, 2020
And it got worse:
Black Lives Matter activists destroy outdoor restaurants in DC, smashing bottles and flipping tables like that Japanese arcade game. pic.twitter.com/KJwRAfX3KI — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 24, 2020
And worse:
BLM activists threw a smoke bomb into a restaurant patio in DC. Peaceful protesters. pic.twitter.com/LzB3pdsvSE — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 24, 2020


therightscoop--2020-09-25--Ok, let’s talk about President Trump “refusing to commit to a peaceful transfer of power”

Two days ago President Trump called on the idiot Playboy reporter in his daily news conference , who essentially asked if he would commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses : Q Mr. President , real quickly : Win , lose , or draw in this election , will you commit here , today , for a peaceful transferal of power after the election ?
And there has been rioting in Louisville .
There ’ s been rioting in many cities across this country — red and — your so-called red and blue states .
Will you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a peaceful transferal of power after the election ?
THE PRESIDENT : Well , we ’ re going to have to see what happens .
You know that .
I ’ ve been complaining very strongly about the ballots .
And the ballots are a disaster .
And — and — Q I understand that , but people are rioting .
Do you commit to making sure that — THE PRESIDENT : Oh , I know .
I know .
Yeah , no , we want — THE PRESIDENT : We want to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and you ’ ll have a very trans- — we ’ ll have a very peaceful — there won ’ t be a transfer , frankly ; there ’ ll be a continuation .
The ballots are out of control .
You know it .
And you know who knows it better than — Because of this exchange the media has gone into overdrive pushing Trump ’ s response as an “ unprecedented attack on America ’ s election.
” Seriously .
Just watch the first 20 seconds of this NBC Nightly News @ @ @ @ @ @ @ introduces the nightly news show saying “ Tonight President Trump ’ s unprecedented attack on America ’ s election .
The president again today casting doubt on the legitimacy of the upcoming vote after refusing to commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he lose to Joe Biden.
” He then goes on to breathlessly introduce their segment on this , which of course was at the very top of the show , by saying : And this way overhyped reporting was after White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany addressed this yesterday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accept the results of a free and fair election .
He will accept the will of the American people.
” I was at my mom ’ s when I heard Lester Holt say this yesterday and I just couldn ’ t believe how grave they were making this sound .
I had a visceral reaction to it and couldn ’ t contain my objection to Holt ’ s panicked reporting as my mom patiently tolerated my outburst .
I can ’ t speak for what exactly Trump was thinking when he answered the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I can tell you exactly what I was thinking .
THE QUESTION WAS OFFENSIVE !
The question presupposes that Trump is some wannabe evil dictator who will try and hold on to power at all costs .
It comes from the demented minds of people who virulently hate Trump and come up with the worst conspiracy theories about him , and it couldn ’ t be further from the truth .
Trump is not a lawless president and never has been .
I know that ’ s what Democrats and their kin were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never came to fruition .
Every time Trump has received a negative court ruling , stopping him from doing something he wants to do , he lawfully fights it with an appeal .
If there ’ s an injunction involved , Trump complies with it until he can get it overturned .
This is the opposite of what Obama did , who was held in contempt of court for violating a judge ’ s order .
Now he was a lawless president !
So when Trump answered the question the other day , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than I was at his answer .
Reporters have been trying for months to get Trump to commit to conceding the election in , one way or another , so they can pressure him with his own words after the results come in , assuming it ’ s close or he ’ s behind .
That ’ s what this is really about .
Well , that and the fact that they want him out so bad they are already dreaming about it .
But as Kayleigh pointed out yesterday , questions like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden and Democrats who have told him not to concede the election under any circumstance , because they plan to litigate the hell out of it to try and legally push Slow Joe over the finish line .
But don ’ t hold your breath for reporters to ask him about this .
The last tough questions he got from the press was during the primary .
Now that he ’ s their candidate to go against Trump , they won ’ t do anything to make him look bad .
He ’ @ @ @

Two days ago President Trump called on the idiot Playboy reporter in his daily news conference, who essentially asked if he would commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses:
Q Mr. President, real quickly: Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here, today, for a peaceful transferal of power after the election? And there has been rioting in Louisville. There’s been rioting in many cities across this country — red and — your so-called red and blue states. Will you commit to making sure that there is a peaceful transferal of power after the election? THE PRESIDENT: Well, we’re going to have to see what happens. You know that. I’ve been complaining very strongly about the ballots. And the ballots are a disaster. And — and — Q I understand that, but people are rioting. Do you commit to making sure that — THE PRESIDENT: Oh, I know. I know. Yeah, no, we want — Q — there’s a peaceful transferal of power? THE PRESIDENT: We want to have — get rid of the ballots and you’ll have a very trans- — we’ll have a very peaceful — there won’t be a transfer, frankly; there’ll be a continuation. The ballots are out of control. You know it. And you know who knows it better than —
Because of this exchange the media has gone into overdrive pushing Trump’s response as an “unprecedented attack on America’s election.” Seriously. Just watch the first 20 seconds of this NBC Nightly News intro from last night:
Lester Holt introduces the nightly news show saying “Tonight President Trump’s unprecedented attack on America’s election. The president again today casting doubt on the legitimacy of the upcoming vote after refusing to commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he lose to Joe Biden.”
He then goes on to breathlessly introduce their segment on this, which of course was at the very top of the show, by saying:
“In a year and a season where shock is hardly in short supply, what may be among the most stunning words spoken by an American president are loudly resonating tonight. President Trump’s refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power should he lose the election. The President dangling doubt over one of the most powerful rights of American democracy.”
And this way overhyped reporting was after White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany addressed this yesterday afternoon, saying “The President will accept the results of a free and fair election. He will accept the will of the American people.”
I was at my mom’s when I heard Lester Holt say this yesterday and I just couldn’t believe how grave they were making this sound. I had a visceral reaction to it and couldn’t contain my objection to Holt’s panicked reporting as my mom patiently tolerated my outburst.
I can’t speak for what exactly Trump was thinking when he answered the question the way he did, but I can tell you exactly what I was thinking. THE QUESTION WAS OFFENSIVE! The question presupposes that Trump is some wannabe evil dictator who will try and hold on to power at all costs. It comes from the demented minds of people who virulently hate Trump and come up with the worst conspiracy theories about him, and it couldn’t be further from the truth.
Trump is not a lawless president and never has been. I know that’s what Democrats and their kin were worried about in 2016, but it never came to fruition. Every time Trump has received a negative court ruling, stopping him from doing something he wants to do, he lawfully fights it with an appeal. If there’s an injunction involved, Trump complies with it until he can get it overturned. This is the opposite of what Obama did, who was held in contempt of court for violating a judge’s order. Now he was a lawless president!
So when Trump answered the question the other day, I was more offended at the question than I was at his answer. Reporters have been trying for months to get Trump to commit to conceding the election in, one way or another, so they can pressure him with his own words after the results come in, assuming it’s close or he’s behind. That’s what this is really about. Well, that and the fact that they want him out so bad they are already dreaming about it.
But as Kayleigh pointed out yesterday, questions like this are really more fitting for Joe Biden and Democrats who have told him not to concede the election under any circumstance, because they plan to litigate the hell out of it to try and legally push Slow Joe over the finish line. But don’t hold your breath for reporters to ask him about this. The last tough questions he got from the press was during the primary. Now that he’s their candidate to go against Trump, they won’t do anything to make him look bad. He’s untouchable.


therightscoop--2020-09-25--BLM mob threatens reporter to STOP filming them or they’ll break his camera

A Star Tribune reporter was in Minneapolis tonight filming the BLM mob as they marched , when they began threatening him if he didn ’ t stop filming : This isn ’ t the first time we ’ ve seen this .
Remember when two mobsters from Black Lives Matter in Wisconsin beat up a gay Democrat who was on their side for filming them ?
They want to destroy the city without consequences , so they are bullying some of these reporters to stop filming them .
And in this case it worked , sadly : I don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for backing off .
It can be very scary when a soulless mob begins to target you .
I just have one question for the mobsters and the media .
If all these ‘ protests ’ so peaceful , then why do these BLMers resort to these tactics ?
Why are they so afraid of being caught on camera just peacefully protesting ?
It can ’ t be because they might be seen with Black Lives Matter and lose their job or something .
Because society has embraced the movement .
Companies everywhere @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their business .
No , the reason is what we mentioned earlier .
They want to burn and pillage and not get caught ; they want to destroy without being destroyed .
They are cowards who can ’ t actually make a compelling case for their destructive , marxist movement , so they lie about cops and use violence and force to cower people into submission .
It ’ s despicable and if it doesn ’ t get stopped , the mob will come for all of us .

A Star Tribune reporter was in Minneapolis tonight filming the BLM mob as they marched, when they began threatening him if he didn’t stop filming:
Protesters chanting “no more pictures” as they march along S. 4th Street along US Bank Stadium. An organizer just came up to me demanding I turn my cameras off. She threatened to snatch my camera me if I didn’t comply. — Aaron Lavinsky (@ADLavinsky) September 25, 2020
This isn’t the first time we’ve seen this. Remember when two mobsters from Black Lives Matter in Wisconsin beat up a gay Democrat who was on their side for filming them? They want to destroy the city without consequences, so they are bullying some of these reporters to stop filming them.
And in this case it worked, sadly:
Folks, I’m backing off. Multiple people threatening to take and break my cameras. Been berated most of the night by a small group of organizers and anarchists. — Aaron Lavinsky (@ADLavinsky) September 25, 2020
I don’t blame this reporter or any reporter for backing off. It can be very scary when a soulless mob begins to target you.
I just have one question for the mobsters and the media. If all these ‘protests’ so peaceful, then why do these BLMers resort to these tactics? Why are they so afraid of being caught on camera just peacefully protesting? It can’t be because they might be seen with Black Lives Matter and lose their job or something. Because society has embraced the movement. Companies everywhere have made supporting BLM a part of their business.
No, the reason is what we mentioned earlier. They want to burn and pillage and not get caught; they want to destroy without being destroyed. They are cowards who can’t actually make a compelling case for their destructive, marxist movement, so they lie about cops and use violence and force to cower people into submission. It’s despicable and if it doesn’t get stopped, the mob will come for all of us.
(By the way, the photo at the top was from a video he shot a couple hours earlier. I don’t know if these are the people who eventually threatened him or not. Just pointing that out to avoid confusion.)


therightscoop--2020-09-26--FANTASTIC video of poor old Alisyn Camerota and her face as Minority voters DEVASTATE her with pro-T

FANTASTIC video of poor old Alisyn Camerota and her face as Minority voters DEVASTATE her with pro-TRUMP remarks

Poor , old , tired , sad , biased , bitter , old Alisyn Camerota was even sadder and older @ @ @ @ @ a segment I missed this morning and I ’ m sure you did too , @ @ @ @ @ SO glad I just found on Twitter .
“ He ’ s doing a phenomenal @ @ @ @ @ vote.
” The pain flashing in Camerota ’ s tired eyes is fantastic as she @ @ @ @ @ so hates to hear .
You know , the words “ vote ” and “ @ @ @ @ @ “ autocrat ” and “ Hitler.
” Oh and the people saying these heartbreaking things @ @ @ @ @ , ” to use the modern left and CNN ( but I repeat myself ) @ @ @ @ @ .
The priceless clip of Trump voters giving ol ’ Camry the business was shared @ @ @ @ @ account , so be sure to thank em .
You got ta love it .
@ @ @ @

Poor, old, tired, sad, biased, bitter, old Alisyn Camerota was even sadder and older today than usual, in a segment I missed this morning and I’m sure you did too, but that I’m SO glad I just found on Twitter.
“He’s doing a phenomenal job and he has my vote.”
The pain flashing in Camerota’s tired eyes is fantastic as she hears those little words she so hates to hear. You know, the words “vote” and “Trump” absent the words “autocrat” and “Hitler.”
Oh and the people saying these heartbreaking things are “people of color,” to use the modern left and CNN (but I repeat myself)’s pretty racist terminology.
The priceless clip of Trump voters giving ol’ Camry the business was shared by the Trump War Room account, so be sure to thank em.
Voters tell CNN why they’re supporting President @realDonaldTrump: “The president is making every effort to do his best for people of color…the president is bringing us together.” “He’s doing a phenomenal job and he has my vote. Absolutely.” pic.twitter.com/4RBYFC36ZW — Trump War Room – Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) September 25, 2020
You gotta love it. Twitter sure did.
CNN is disappointed..🤣 — Unnikrishnan (@unnicelibate) September 25, 2020
Look at the face of CNN host 😁 — Dario Atencio E 😷 (@atenciodari) September 25, 2020
Look at her face 😂😂 — Mario bet (@BetancourtMarai) September 25, 2020
As Twitchy said: Priceless.


therightscoop--2020-09-26--WATCH LIVE: President Trump holds MAGA campaign rally in Virginia at 9PM

Tonight President Trump is holding a campaign rally at Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport in Virginia tonight at 9PM .
You @ @ @ @ @

Tonight President Trump is holding a campaign rally at Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport in Virginia tonight at 9PM. You can watch it below:
RSB (already live):
FOX NEWS:
WHILE YOU WAIT:
Shy cat decides to start taking flying leaps onto her foster mom! 💜 pic.twitter.com/53j135oTI4 — The Dodo (@dodo) September 25, 2020
She’s so happy to swim in the lake, she can’t stop biting the water 😍 pic.twitter.com/3VoSpXuSzn — The Dodo (@dodo) September 24, 2020


therightscoop--2020-09-25--Pro-Mob Brianna Keilar flat LIES about McEnany and the press are HAVING FITS OF ECSTASY over it.

Brianna Keilar , like most of CNN , loves riots , murder , and mayhem .
And not just in the cliché “ bleeds it leads ” kind of way .
Not just the “ chopper nine is tracking a police chase ” way .
CNN and especially Brianna Keilar like the violent mob and riotous destruction for its own sake .
They think it will get rid of Trump .
They think that praising it makes them good liberals , the good kind of white people , not the bad kind .
Their racist condescension toward people they consider @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” has them on TV every day trying to mimic sad wisdom and grave earnestness .
Keilar is the distilled perfection of this rich white lib syndrome .
She ’ s happy to defund the police because her neighborhood has guards and security .
She loves the “ outpouring ” of the mob because the mob doesn ’ t go where she gets her $ 40 a cup coffee while her poodle is having its hair did .
And this week the TV airhead , who hasn ’ t figured out her single @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( probably because you ’ d need a double digit one to figure that out ) , reprimanded the black Attorney General of Kentucky for not being woke enough .
Which is the most perfect white lady thing you can possible do : tell a black guy he ’ s not as black as you are .
Attorney General Daniel Cameron gave an outstanding set of remarks to the press as he made the controversial Breonna Taylor grand jury announcement , and afterward Brianna Karen-ar bitched him out on CNN .
“ What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ saying ‘ mob justice is not justice ’ ?
He said it becomes revenge , ' ” she asked her guests .
“ Because that word the mob , and the president having said if Joe Biden wins the mob wins , that ’ s what he says , we know this is very politically loaded language , it ’ s already been seized by people on both sides of this debate , about what we are seeing in this fight for criminal justice reform in this country.
” Notice that McEnany didn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , twisted comments .
She just gave the example of how the irresponsible media ’ s evil rhetoric isn ’ t reflected by reality that takes place just hours later .
“ You have a right to peaceful protest as outlined and the First Amendment .
And the Attorney General Daniel Cameron said , ‘ If we simply act on emotion or outrage , there is no justice .
Mob justice is not justice .
Justice sought by violence is not justice , it just becomes revenge.
’ And you contrast his message @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Keeler who said , ‘ I question the judgment of the Kentucky Attorney General saying that mob justice is not justice .
We know that this is very loaded language.
’ That ’ s an appalling statement from Brianna Keilar at CNN , and what is outrageous about this take is that mob justice is not justice .
Hours later after this comment was made on CNN , two police officers were shot .
This is not justice .
This has nothing to do with politics .
It has everything to do with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safety and security of our American cities.
” McEnany is right .
Keilar ’ s statement was appalling .
It was even worse than McEnany politely put it , because Keilar was pandering and was trying to make it about Trump instead of about Breonna Taylor .
Now Keilar is done making it about Trump and is instead making it about herself .
“ Yesterday White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany implied that I am responsible for two police officers being shot in Louisville.
” No .
She didn ’ t .
She @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sorry , Brianna , that ’ s not what she said .
That ’ s a lie .
You are literally lying about lying .
McEnany quoted you on mob justice and demonstrated that it was only hours later when the shallow and hollow emptiness of your words was shown as false and contemptible and by the actions of the mob in an attempt on two blue lives .
You know that , but you want to be the story so you pretend you don ’ t .
And the rest of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the good guys fighting the bad Trump guys , so they are pretending with you .
Here ’ s more of her lying .
This part of the clip is from Twitter and was shared endlessly by people who none of us here at Right Scoop give a lick about , so I ’ m just embedding the video and not their lame tweets .
I can ’ t hardly even believe my ears that a person from CNN had the outright chutzpah to complain about quotes being taken out of context .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the next week of trashing Amy Coney Barrett !
it ’ s literally their number one resource !
But to complain about it WHILE she ’ s doing it to McEnany ?
That ’ s a whole new level .
She also went after Cameron again , emphasizing his being a Republican before accusing the black Attorney General of being a racist .
CNN is depraved and indifferent .
They ’ re privileged snobs .
They ’ re pro-mob justice and pro-riot .
And Brianna Keilar is a dumb liar and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But the liberal left that we hilariously call our press eat it up .
You know what Keilar didn ’ t do in her rambling “ pushback ” against McEnany ?
Condemn the killing of the two police officers .
Nor in the original commentary bashing the Kentucky AG for not being woke enough did she condemn rioting and mob justice .
WELL I ’ LL BE , HOW DO YA LIKE THAT ?
You couldn ’ t prove in court that Keilar thinks the mob killing cops is bad .
Those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just noise .

Brianna Keilar, like most of CNN, loves riots, murder, and mayhem. And not just in the cliché “bleeds it leads” kind of way. Not just the “chopper nine is tracking a police chase” way. CNN and especially Brianna Keilar like the violent mob and riotous destruction for its own sake.
They think it will get rid of Trump. They think that praising it makes them good liberals, the good kind of white people, not the bad kind. Their racist condescension toward people they consider to be of a “lower class” has them on TV every day trying to mimic sad wisdom and grave earnestness.
Keilar is the distilled perfection of this rich white lib syndrome. She’s happy to defund the police because her neighborhood has guards and security. She loves the “outpouring” of the mob because the mob doesn’t go where she gets her $40 a cup coffee while her poodle is having its hair did.
And this week the TV airhead, who hasn’t figured out her single digit IQ doesn’t impress people (probably because you’d need a double digit one to figure that out), reprimanded the black Attorney General of Kentucky for not being woke enough.
Which is the most perfect white lady thing you can possible do: tell a black guy he’s not as black as you are.
Attorney General Daniel Cameron gave an outstanding set of remarks to the press as he made the controversial Breonna Taylor grand jury announcement, and afterward Brianna Karen-ar bitched him out on CNN.
“What do you think of … Attorney General saying ‘mob justice is not justice’? He said it becomes revenge,'” she asked her guests. “Because that word the mob, and the president having said if Joe Biden wins the mob wins, that’s what he says, we know this is very politically loaded language, it’s already been seized by people on both sides of this debate, about what we are seeing in this fight for criminal justice reform in this country.”
McEnany called out Keilar.
Notice that McEnany didn’t blame Keilar or her sick, twisted comments. She just gave the example of how the irresponsible media’s evil rhetoric isn’t reflected by reality that takes place just hours later.
“You have a right to peaceful protest as outlined and the First Amendment. And the Attorney General Daniel Cameron said, ‘If we simply act on emotion or outrage, there is no justice. Mob justice is not justice. Justice sought by violence is not justice, it just becomes revenge.’ And you contrast his message with that of CNN’s Brianna Keeler who said, ‘I question the judgment of the Kentucky Attorney General saying that mob justice is not justice. We know that this is very loaded language.’ That’s an appalling statement from Brianna Keilar at CNN, and what is outrageous about this take is that mob justice is not justice. Hours later after this comment was made on CNN, two police officers were shot. This is not justice. This has nothing to do with politics. It has everything to do with the value of human life and the safety and security of our American cities.”
McEnany is right. Keilar’s statement was appalling. It was even worse than McEnany politely put it, because Keilar was pandering and was trying to make it about Trump instead of about Breonna Taylor.
Now Keilar is done making it about Trump and is instead making it about herself.
“Yesterday White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany implied that I am responsible for two police officers being shot in Louisville.”
No. She didn’t. She sure as shootin COULD have, but sorry, Brianna, that’s not what she said. That’s a lie. You are literally lying about lying.
McEnany quoted you on mob justice and demonstrated that it was only hours later when the shallow and hollow emptiness of your words was shown as false and contemptible and by the actions of the mob in an attempt on two blue lives.
You know that, but you want to be the story so you pretend you don’t. And the rest of the media wants to bash Trump and be the good guys fighting the bad Trump guys, so they are pretending with you.
Here’s more of her lying. This part of the clip is from Twitter and was shared endlessly by people who none of us here at Right Scoop give a lick about, so I’m just embedding the video and not their lame tweets.
I can’t hardly even believe my ears that a person from CNN had the outright chutzpah to complain about quotes being taken out of context. That’s their entire game plan for the next week of trashing Amy Coney Barrett! it’s literally their number one resource!
But to complain about it WHILE she’s doing it to McEnany? That’s a whole new level.
She also went after Cameron again, emphasizing his being a Republican before accusing the black Attorney General of being a racist.
CNN is depraved and indifferent. They’re privileged snobs. They’re pro-mob justice and pro-riot. And Brianna Keilar is a dumb liar and the proof is right on the dang video. But the liberal left that we hilariously call our press eat it up.
You know what Keilar didn’t do in her rambling “pushback” against McEnany? Condemn the killing of the two police officers. Nor in the original commentary bashing the Kentucky AG for not being woke enough did she condemn rioting and mob justice.
WELL I’LL BE, HOW DO YA LIKE THAT?
You couldn’t prove in court that Keilar thinks the mob killing cops is bad. Those are the facts. Everything else is just noise.


therightscoop--2020-09-25--It’s (going to be) Amy Coney Barrett!! GOOD! We figured that (of course) but now Drudge and CNN know

It’s (going to be) Amy Coney Barrett!! GOOD! We figured that (of course) but now Drudge and CNN know, too!

Tomorrow President Donald Trump will announce his nominee for the Supreme Court , and that is almost 100 % certainly going to be Judge Amy Coney Barrett .
Redstate , Hot Air , and Twitter are reporting that CNN and Drudge have come around to realizing , and perhaps confirming through sources , that Barrett is The One .
This is of course what most of us have expected and felt pretty sure about all week .
And even though it ain ’ t totally in the bag yet , the fact that the MSM is facing facts — now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treat her religious beliefs like some kind of voodoo , Game of Thrones , Handmaid ’ s Tale , oogie boogie for a few hours — is a pretty good sign that ’ s what the President is going to do .
And that is a very good thing , y ’ all .
President Donald Trump intends to choose Amy Coney Barrett to be the new Supreme Court justice , according to multiple senior Republican sources with knowledge of the process .
In conversations with some senior Republican allies on the Hill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Barrett is the intended nominee , multiple sources said… Barrett has been the leading choice throughout the week , since Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died .
She is the only potential nominee known to have met with the President in person , according to two of the sources .
One source said Trump was familiar with Barrett already and he met with her since she was a top contender the last time there was a Supreme Court vacancy , when the President chose Justice Brett Kavanaugh instead… “ She was the plan all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distinguished and qualified by traditional measures .
She has the strongest support among the legal conservatives who have dedicated their lives to the court .
She will contribute most to the court ’ s jurisprudence in the years and decades to come , ” according to a former senior administration official familiar with the process .
So there you go .
Here ’ s a Fox News report on Barrett .
Excellent news .
Tomorrow we ’ ll know for SURE sure but for now this ’ ll do .
Updates : All @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t wait to try to Kavanaugh her .
One thing they forget in all these plans .
Kavanaugh got confirmed .
Libs , your tactics are repugnant so they don ’ t work .

Tomorrow President Donald Trump will announce his nominee for the Supreme Court, and that is almost 100% certainly going to be Judge Amy Coney Barrett.
Redstate, Hot Air, and Twitter are reporting that CNN and Drudge have come around to realizing, and perhaps confirming through sources, that Barrett is The One.
Good.
This is of course what most of us have expected and felt pretty sure about all week. And even though it ain’t totally in the bag yet, the fact that the MSM is facing facts — now that they’re done trying to treat her religious beliefs like some kind of voodoo, Game of Thrones, Handmaid’s Tale, oogie boogie for a few hours — is a pretty good sign that’s what the President is going to do.
And that is a very good thing, y’all.
Here’s CNN’s, err, scoop.
President Donald Trump intends to choose Amy Coney Barrett to be the new Supreme Court justice, according to multiple senior Republican sources with knowledge of the process. In conversations with some senior Republican allies on the Hill, the White House is indicating that Barrett is the intended nominee, multiple sources said… Barrett has been the leading choice throughout the week, since Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died. She is the only potential nominee known to have met with the President in person, according to two of the sources. One source said Trump was familiar with Barrett already and he met with her since she was a top contender the last time there was a Supreme Court vacancy, when the President chose Justice Brett Kavanaugh instead… “She was the plan all along. She’s the most distinguished and qualified by traditional measures. She has the strongest support among the legal conservatives who have dedicated their lives to the court. She will contribute most to the court’s jurisprudence in the years and decades to come,” according to a former senior administration official familiar with the process.
So there you go. Here’s a Fox News report on Barrett.
Watch the latest video at foxnews.com
Excellent news. Tomorrow we’ll know for SURE sure but for now this’ll do.
Updates:
All the haters are confirming. They can’t wait to try to Kavanaugh her.
CONFIRMED: A senior White House official tells me President Trump is expected to nominate Judge Amy Coney Barrett as his nominee to the Surpreme Court. (CNN and CBS are also reporting this.) — Yamiche Alcindor (@Yamiche) September 25, 2020
One thing they forget in all these plans. Kavanaugh got confirmed. Libs, your tactics are repugnant so they don’t work.


therightscoop--2020-09-25--WATCH: Mark Meadows destroys FBI Director Chris Wray

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows destroyed FBI Director Chris Wray over his assertion that he hasn ’ t seen widespread mail-in voter fraud : “ With all due respect to Director Wray , he has a hard time finding emails in his own FBI , let alone figuring out whether there ’ s any kind of voter fraud.
” OUCH !
One of MSNBC ’ s producers ( former CNN ) responded to the clip accusing Meadows of lying about mail-in voter fraud to undermine the election : This is a garbage take .
Instead of debunking it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the top law enforcement official in the country : “ Well we haven ’ t had the kind of WIDESPREAD use of mail-in ballots that ’ s being proposed !
” That ’ s really the point .
All of these leftists like Griffin keep crying that there ’ s no proof of widespread voter fraud related to mail-in ballots .
But we ’ ve never done mail-in voting on a scale that ’ s being proposed now .
It ’ s all deception on their part to justify the use of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fraud .
And everyone knows it .

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows destroyed FBI Director Chris Wray over his assertion that he hasn’t seen widespread mail-in voter fraud:
With all due respect to Director Wray, he has a hard time finding emails in his own FBI, let alone figuring out whether there's any kind of voter fraud.” — White House Chief of Staff @MarkMeadows on FBI Dir. Christopher Wray saying he's seen no evidence of widespread voter fraud pic.twitter.com/W5PUfpnWCn — CBS This Morning (@CBSThisMorning) September 25, 2020
“With all due respect to Director Wray, he has a hard time finding emails in his own FBI, let alone figuring out whether there’s any kind of voter fraud.” OUCH!
One of MSNBC’s producers (former CNN) responded to the clip accusing Meadows of lying about mail-in voter fraud to undermine the election:
Mark Meadows is lying and misdirecting. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud. He is lying — without evidence — to undermine confidence in elections. — Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) September 25, 2020
This is a garbage take. Instead of debunking it myself, let’s hear again from the top law enforcement official in the country:
“Well we haven’t had the kind of WIDESPREAD use of mail-in ballots that’s being proposed!” That’s really the point. All of these leftists like Griffin keep crying that there’s no proof of widespread voter fraud related to mail-in ballots. But we’ve never done mail-in voting on a scale that’s being proposed now. It’s all deception on their part to justify the use of something that will result in widespread voter fraud. And everyone knows it.


therightscoop--2020-09-25--WATCH LIVE: President Trump lays out his “Black Economic Empowerment: The Platinum Plan”

Today President Trump is going to lay out his Black economic empowerment plan at 2:40PM in Atlanta , GA and @ @ @ @ @

Today President Trump is going to lay out his Black economic empowerment plan at 2:40PM in Atlanta, GA and you can watch below:
FOX BUSINESS:
PBS NEWSHOUR:
RSB:
WHILE YOU WAIT:
Lost baby goat sprints back to his mom the second he finds his family 💜 pic.twitter.com/bGqlq62MJi — The Dodo (@dodo) September 25, 2020


therightscoop--2020-09-25--“There has to be a price to pay” – Pelosi threatens Republicans over SCOTUS nomination

The despicable Nancy Pelosi today threatened Republicans , saying “ there has to be a price to pay ” if Republicans move forward with the SCOTUS nomination : Gayle King immediately asks Pelosi about the ‘ arrows ’ in her ‘ quiver ’ that she claimed to have before , suggesting they are running out of time .
Pelosi just played it off with a dumb joke , claiming it was simply a figure of speech .
Yes Nancy , we all know you don ’ t really have a quiver full of arrows .
But what she was really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arrows ’ at all and that she ’ s a fraud .
There ’ s nothing she can do to stop the Senate from confirming a new Supreme Court justice .
I think when she says ‘ there has to be a price to pay ’ , she ’ s just trying to get voters worked up to vote Trump and Senate Republicans out of office , as if they are doing something so gravely wrong that voters have an obligation to give them the boot .
It ’ s absurd .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ted Cruz schooling Democrats yesterday on why they are completely wrong :

The despicable Nancy Pelosi today threatened Republicans, saying “there has to be a price to pay” if Republicans move forward with the SCOTUS nomination:
Gayle King immediately asks Pelosi about the ‘arrows’ in her ‘quiver’ that she claimed to have before, suggesting they are running out of time. Pelosi just played it off with a dumb joke, claiming it was simply a figure of speech. Yes Nancy, we all know you don’t really have a quiver full of arrows.
But what she was really saying is that she has no ‘arrows’ at all and that she’s a fraud. There’s nothing she can do to stop the Senate from confirming a new Supreme Court justice.
I think when she says ‘there has to be a price to pay’, she’s just trying to get voters worked up to vote Trump and Senate Republicans out of office, as if they are doing something so gravely wrong that voters have an obligation to give them the boot. It’s absurd.
As a palate cleanser, here’s Ted Cruz schooling Democrats yesterday on why they are completely wrong:


therightscoop--2020-09-25--REVEALED: FBI official on Team Mueller believed Flynn probe was really to “get Trump”, thought Russi

REVEALED: FBI official on Team Mueller believed Flynn probe was really to “get Trump”, thought Russia collusion probe was baseless

Turns out there was one FBI agent on Team Mueller that didn ’ t believe the Trump/Russian collusion probe was valid and thought the Flynn investigation was just being used as a means to ‘ get Trump ’ .
This is a long read but it ’ s worth it .
FOX NEWS – An FBI official who served on Robert Mueller ’ s team said he believed the special counsel ’ s prosecution of former White House national security adviser Michael Flynn was part of an attitude to “ get Trump , ” and that he did not wish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it was “ not there ” and considered it to be a “ dead end.
” FBI agent William J. Barnett made the comments during an interview on Sept. 17 at the Justice Department , before Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri Jeffrey Jensen , who was tapped by Attorney General Bill Barr to review the case against Flynn .
Jensen has joined U.S. Attorney John Durham ’ s team in his review of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe .
Those comments have surfaced in new government documents .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ 302 , which was filed by the U.S. government early Friday as part of the Flynn case .
Barnett , during his interview , detailed his work at the FBI , and his assignment to the bureau ’ s original cases against Flynn and former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort .
Barnett said the Flynn investigation was assigned the code name “ Crossfire Razor , ” which was part of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation — the bureau ’ s code name for the original Trump-Russia probe .
Barnett believed “ predication ” for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and even wanted to interview Flynn and then close the case .
But his request was denied by Andrew McCabe : Barnett told investigators that he thought the FBI ’ s Trump-Russia probe was “ opaque ” and “ with little detail concerning specific evidence of criminal events.
” “ Barnett thought the case theory was ‘ supposition on supposition , ’ ” the 302 stated , and added that the “ predication ” of the Flynn investigation was “ not great , ” and that it “ was not clear ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wanted to ‘ look for or at.
’ ” After six weeks of investigating , Barnett said he was “ still unsure of the basis of the investigation concerning Russia and the Trump campaign working together , without a specific criminal allegation.
” Barnett began asking agents what they thought “ the end game ” was in the Flynn investigation , and suggested that they interview Flynn “ and the case be closed unless derogatory information was obtained , ” but said he was “ cautioned against ” an interview of Flynn , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alert Flynn as to the investigation.
” Barnett , though , told investigators that he believed that Flynn ’ s position as White House national security adviser in the incoming Trump administration “ offered an opportunity for the FBI to conduct the interview without alerting any suspicion and Flynn would see such an interview as being standard procedure.
” The 302 stated that Barnett ran the request to interview Flynn “ up the chain , ” but said the request was denied , and described the FBI ’ s investigation into Flynn as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ direction concerning the investigation was coming from senior officials , ” specifically then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe , who Barnett believed was “ directing ” the Flynn investigation .
Barnett , at the time , said that he believed the investigation was “ problematic and could result in an inspector general investigation.
” Barnett saw “ no evidence of collusion ” and didn ’ t believe the probe “ was leading or headed toward prosecution ” : “ Barnett still did not see any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Barnett was willing to follow any instructions being given by the deputy director as long as it was not a violation of the law.
” Barnett told investigators he believed the investigation into Flynn was a “ check the box exercise , making sure all bases were covered , before the case was closed , ” and said he “ did not ” think the case “ was leading or headed toward prosecution.
” Barnett said Jeanne Rhee in the Special Counsel ’ s office “ was obsessed with Flynn and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Nevertheless , Barnett said that he believed there were grounds to investigate “ the other three subjects in Crossfire Hurricane , however , he thought Flynn was the ‘ outlier.
’ ” But Barnett , in the spring of 2017 , gave a briefing on the Flynn investigation to a group of attorneys from the Special Counsel ’ s Office , including Jeanne Rhee .
“ Barnett said he briefly went over the investigation , including the assessment that there was no evidence of a crime , and then discussed [ REDACTED @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more significant investigation , ” the 302 stated .
Barnett told investigators that he thought “ Rhee was obsessed with Flynn and Russia and she had an agenda.
” A day following the briefing , Barnett said he was contacted by former FBI agent Peter Strzok , who said “ he really wanted Barnett to work with the special counsel ’ s office.
” According to the 302 , Barnett told Strzok that he “ did not wish to pursue the collusion investigation as it was ‘ not there , ' ” Ultimately @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with Mueller ’ s team , “ hoping his perspective would keep them from ‘ group think.
’ ” Barnett believed Team Mueller had a “ get Trump ” attitude and they wanted to be part of a ‘ big successful prosecution ” : Barnett added that he believed the appointment of Mueller in May 2017 “ changed everything , ” and described the situation pertaining to the special counsel ’ s office as “ ‘ upside down ’ with attorneys drafting search warrants and getting agents to simply act as affiants , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thought there was a ‘ get Trump ’ attitude by some at the SCO , ” the 302 continued .
One example Barnett shared was comments made by the president , saying investigators “ needed to ‘ get to the bottom ’ of a matter .
One of the SCO attorneys said Trump wanted to ‘ cover it up.
’ ” Barnett “ corrected it saying , ‘ no , he said get to the bottom of it.
’ ” Barnett also said that “ another example , ” was when the president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he said was interpreted as “ obstruction when it could just as easily have been done because Trump did not like Comey and wanted him replaced.
” But Barnett went on to tell investigators that it seemed that the attorneys on Mueller ’ s team “ wanted to be part of something ‘ big , ’ a successful prosecution.
” “ There was a lack of letting the evidence lead the investigation and more the attitude of ‘ the evidence is there we just have to find it , ’ ” Barnett ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the prosecution of Flynn by Mueller ’ s office was used as a means to ‘ get Trump . '
” What ’ s even more maddening about all of this is that it adds to the proof that AG Barr was right to drop the charges against Flynn , yet the courts want to keep it alive .
Both the Trump/Russia probe and the Flynn investigation were completely bogus from the beginning and the media relentlessly pushed it on the country the entire time .
This is one of the biggest reasons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Turns out there was one FBI agent on Team Mueller that didn’t believe the Trump/Russian collusion probe was valid and thought the Flynn investigation was just being used as a means to ‘get Trump’. This is a long read but it’s worth it.
FOX NEWS – An FBI official who served on Robert Mueller’s team said he believed the special counsel’s prosecution of former White House national security adviser Michael Flynn was part of an attitude to “get Trump,” and that he did not wish to pursue a Trump-Russia collusion investigation as it was “not there” and considered it to be a “dead end.” FBI agent William J. Barnett made the comments during an interview on Sept. 17 at the Justice Department, before Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri Jeffrey Jensen, who was tapped by Attorney General Bill Barr to review the case against Flynn. Jensen has joined U.S. Attorney John Durham’s team in his review of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe. Those comments have surfaced in new government documents. Fox News reviewed Barnett’s FBI 302, which was filed by the U.S. government early Friday as part of the Flynn case. Barnett, during his interview, detailed his work at the FBI, and his assignment to the bureau’s original cases against Flynn and former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. Barnett said the Flynn investigation was assigned the code name “Crossfire Razor,” which was part of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation — the bureau’s code name for the original Trump-Russia probe.
Barnett believed “predication” for the Flynn probe was “not great” and even wanted to interview Flynn and then close the case. But his request was denied by Andrew McCabe:
Barnett told investigators that he thought the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe was “opaque” and “with little detail concerning specific evidence of criminal events.” “Barnett thought the case theory was ‘supposition on supposition,’” the 302 stated, and added that the “predication” of the Flynn investigation was “not great,” and that it “was not clear” what the “persons opening the case wanted to ‘look for or at.’” After six weeks of investigating, Barnett said he was “still unsure of the basis of the investigation concerning Russia and the Trump campaign working together, without a specific criminal allegation.” Barnett began asking agents what they thought “the end game” was in the Flynn investigation, and suggested that they interview Flynn “and the case be closed unless derogatory information was obtained,” but said he was “cautioned against” an interview of Flynn, due to concerns that it would “alert Flynn as to the investigation.” Barnett, though, told investigators that he believed that Flynn’s position as White House national security adviser in the incoming Trump administration “offered an opportunity for the FBI to conduct the interview without alerting any suspicion and Flynn would see such an interview as being standard procedure.” The 302 stated that Barnett ran the request to interview Flynn “up the chain,” but said the request was denied, and described the FBI’s investigation into Flynn as “top down”–meaning that “direction concerning the investigation was coming from senior officials,” specifically then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who Barnett believed was “directing” the Flynn investigation. Barnett, at the time, said that he believed the investigation was “problematic and could result in an inspector general investigation.”
Barnett saw “no evidence of collusion” and didn’t believe the probe “was leading or headed toward prosecution”:
“Barnett still did not see any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government,” the 302 stated. “Barnett was willing to follow any instructions being given by the deputy director as long as it was not a violation of the law.” Barnett told investigators he believed the investigation into Flynn was a “check the box exercise, making sure all bases were covered, before the case was closed,” and said he “did not” think the case “was leading or headed toward prosecution.”
Barnett said Jeanne Rhee in the Special Counsel’s office “was obsessed with Flynn and Russia and she had an agenda”:
Nevertheless, Barnett said that he believed there were grounds to investigate “the other three subjects in Crossfire Hurricane, however, he thought Flynn was the ‘outlier.’” But Barnett, in the spring of 2017, gave a briefing on the Flynn investigation to a group of attorneys from the Special Counsel’s Office, including Jeanne Rhee. “Barnett said he briefly went over the investigation, including the assessment that there was no evidence of a crime, and then discussed [REDACTED], which he thought was the more significant investigation,” the 302 stated. Barnett told investigators that he thought “Rhee was obsessed with Flynn and Russia and she had an agenda.” A day following the briefing, Barnett said he was contacted by former FBI agent Peter Strzok, who said “he really wanted Barnett to work with the special counsel’s office.” According to the 302, Barnett told Strzok that he “did not wish to pursue the collusion investigation as it was ‘not there,'” Ultimately, though, Barnett decided to work with Mueller’s team, “hoping his perspective would keep them from ‘group think.’”
Barnett believed Team Mueller had a “get Trump” attitude and they wanted to be part of a ‘big successful prosecution”:
Barnett added that he believed the appointment of Mueller in May 2017 “changed everything,” and described the situation pertaining to the special counsel’s office as “‘upside down’ with attorneys drafting search warrants and getting agents to simply act as affiants,” the 302 stated. “Barnett thought there was a ‘get Trump’ attitude by some at the SCO,” the 302 continued. One example Barnett shared was comments made by the president, saying investigators “needed to ‘get to the bottom’ of a matter. One of the SCO attorneys said Trump wanted to ‘cover it up.’” Barnett “corrected it saying, ‘no, he said get to the bottom of it.’” Barnett also said that “another example,” was when the president fired FBI Director James Comey, which he said was interpreted as “obstruction when it could just as easily have been done because Trump did not like Comey and wanted him replaced.” But Barnett went on to tell investigators that it seemed that the attorneys on Mueller’s team “wanted to be part of something ‘big,’ a successful prosecution.” “There was a lack of letting the evidence lead the investigation and more the attitude of ‘the evidence is there we just have to find it,’” Barnett’s 302 stated.
“Barnett believed the prosecution of Flynn by Mueller’s office was used as a means to ‘get Trump.'”
Flynn pleaded guilty to making a false statement to the FBI regarding his communications with the Russian ambassador. Barnett said “some individuals” in Mueller’s office “assumed Flynn was lying to cover up collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.” “Barnett believed Flynn lied in his interview to save his job, as that was the most plausible explanation and there was no evidence to contradict it,” the 302 stated. “Barnett believed the prosecution of Flynn by Mueller’s office was used as a means to ‘get Trump.'” The government’s filing of Barnett’s 302 in the Flynn docket comes just days before Flynn’s team and Justice Department attorneys will present arguments before Judge Emmet Sullivan with the hopes that he will dismiss the case.
What’s even more maddening about all of this is that it adds to the proof that AG Barr was right to drop the charges against Flynn, yet the courts want to keep it alive.
Both the Trump/Russia probe and the Flynn investigation were completely bogus from the beginning and the media relentlessly pushed it on the country the entire time. This is one of the biggest reasons why Trump must be re-elected in November.


therightscoop--2020-09-25--Charles Barkley speaks an uncomfortable truth: Breonna Taylor shouldn’t be “lumped in” with George F

Charles Barkley speaks an uncomfortable truth: Breonna Taylor shouldn’t be “lumped in” with George Floyd

Charles Barkley said something last night that you won ’ t hear many on the left saying and it ’ s sure to drive people on the left mad : NY POST – Basketball legend and NBA analyst Charles Barkley defended Louisville police this week , insisting that the shooting of Breonna Taylor shouldn ’ t be “ lumped in ” with other high-profile shootings of unarmed black people .
On the Thursday night TNT pregame show for game four of the Western Conference Finals between the Los Angeles Lakers and Denver Nuggets , Barkley sounded off about his thoughts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t think this one was like George Floyd or Ahmaud Arbery and things like that , ” Barkley said , according to The Hollywood Reporter .
“ I feel sad that this young lady lost her life .
I think this one was — the no-knock warrant is something we need to get rid of … across the board .
But I am worried to lump all these situations in together.
” “ And I just feel bad that the young lady lost her life , ” he added .
“ But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that her boyfriend shot at the cops and shot a cop .
So like I say , even though I am really sorry she lost her life , I just don ’ t think we can put this in the same situation as George Floyd or Ahmaud Arbery.
” Well he ’ s wrong about it being a no-knock warrant , but he ’ s right about the rest .
Her boyfriend did begin shooting at the cops after they had already knocked and announced themselves , breached the door and were visibly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appreciate that he has the courage to say this when most of the left , including the media , is more interested in keeping people riled up and angry because they hope it will turn into votes against Trump .
Shaquille O ’ Neal also agreed with Barkley , saying “ “ I have to agree with Charles , this one is sort of lumped in , ” O ’ Neal said .
“ You have to get a warrant signed and some states do allow no-knock warrants .
And everyone was asking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about murder , you have to show intent .
A homicide occurred and we ’ re sorry a homicide occurred .
When you have a warrant signed by the judge , you are doing your job , and I would imagine that you would fire back.
” Again Shaq is wrong on the no-knock warrant , but he ’ s right that these officers were just doing their job and had a right to defend themselves .
Barkley continued , also slamming the stupid idea of defunding the police : Predictably , this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wasn ’ t asleep in her bed .
That ’ s another BLM lie .
She was standing beside her boyfriend who began shooting at the police after they breached the door .
I know we ’ ve criticized Barkley in the past for saying dumb stuff , but we ’ ve also praised him in the past for daring to speak truth when it went against the narrative of the left .
And this is another one of those instances .
Kudos to both Barkley and Shaq .

Charles Barkley said something last night that you won’t hear many on the left saying and it’s sure to drive people on the left mad:
NY POST – Basketball legend and NBA analyst Charles Barkley defended Louisville police this week, insisting that the shooting of Breonna Taylor shouldn’t be “lumped in” with other high-profile shootings of unarmed black people. On the Thursday night TNT pregame show for game four of the Western Conference Finals between the Los Angeles Lakers and Denver Nuggets, Barkley sounded off about his thoughts on the case. “I don’t think this one was like George Floyd or Ahmaud Arbery and things like that,” Barkley said, according to The Hollywood Reporter. “I feel sad that this young lady lost her life. I think this one was — the no-knock warrant is something we need to get rid of … across the board. But I am worried to lump all these situations in together.” “And I just feel bad that the young lady lost her life,” he added. “But we do have to take into account that her boyfriend shot at the cops and shot a cop. So like I say, even though I am really sorry she lost her life, I just don’t think we can put this in the same situation as George Floyd or Ahmaud Arbery.”
Well he’s wrong about it being a no-knock warrant, but he’s right about the rest. Her boyfriend did begin shooting at the cops after they had already knocked and announced themselves, breached the door and were visibly inside the apartment. And I really appreciate that he has the courage to say this when most of the left, including the media, is more interested in keeping people riled up and angry because they hope it will turn into votes against Trump.
Shaquille O’Neal also agreed with Barkley, saying ““I have to agree with Charles, this one is sort of lumped in,” O’Neal said. “You have to get a warrant signed and some states do allow no-knock warrants. And everyone was asking for murder charges. When you talk about murder, you have to show intent. A homicide occurred and we’re sorry a homicide occurred. When you have a warrant signed by the judge, you are doing your job, and I would imagine that you would fire back.”
Again Shaq is wrong on the no-knock warrant, but he’s right that these officers were just doing their job and had a right to defend themselves.
Barkley continued, also slamming the stupid idea of defunding the police:
Charles Barkley on defunding the police "Who are black people supposed to call Ghost Busters when we have crime in our neighborhood? We need to stop the defund or abolish the police crap" pic.twitter.com/uEIsnX729g — gifdsports (@gifdsports) September 25, 2020
He also pushed back against the nationwide movement to defund police departments. “I hear these fools on TV talking about defund the police and things like that,” Barkley said. “I’m like, wait a minute, who are black people supposed to call? Ghostbusters? When we have crime in our neighborhoods?”
Predictably, this triggered several on the left:
“I didn’t know I could be this disgusted by Charles Barkley,” Democratic strategist Adam Parkhomenko wrote. “What is Charles Barkley talking about???????????????” journalist Britni Danielle wrote. “This [Brianna Taylor’s death] isn’t like Ahmaud Arbery and George Floyd. You’re right. It’s not, because she was at home, asleep in her bed. TF???”
She wasn’t asleep in her bed. That’s another BLM lie. She was standing beside her boyfriend who began shooting at the police after they breached the door.
I know we’ve criticized Barkley in the past for saying dumb stuff, but we’ve also praised him in the past for daring to speak truth when it went against the narrative of the left. And this is another one of those instances. Kudos to both Barkley and Shaq.


therightscoop--2020-09-25--Mark Levin RIPS the NY Times for smearing him over speaking the truth about COVID-19 deaths

The New York Times attacked Mark Levin yesterday for speaking the truth about the real number of COVID-19 deaths : When the coronavirus death toll in the United States passed 200,000 on Tuesday , matching projections made by White House experts this spring , many of the right-wing media personalities who had mocked the estimates as overblown were quiet .
The death toll , tracked by Johns Hopkins University and a New York Times database , is most likely an undercount , many public health experts believe .
At least 266,000 more people have died in the United States during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ case during a typical year .
Mark Levin , the host of a syndicated radio show and a Fox News program , declared on Twitter on Wednesday that “ THE U.S. DID NOT SURPASS 200,000 COVID-19 DEATHS.
” As evidence , he cited data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showing that 94 percent of the reported deaths involved underlying health problems and that 6 percent of the people who died had no illness or medical condition other than Covid-19 .
Mr. Levin was one of several popular radio hosts who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make a case that the pandemic death toll was inflated , a false claim that was also promoted by a supporter of the QAnon conspiracy theory and amplified by President Trump in a post that Twitter removed last month .
Health experts have repeatedly debunked that interpretation of the data .
Earlier this month , Dr. Anthony S. Fauci , the country ’ s leading infectious disease expert , tried to clear up any misconceptions during an appearance on “ Good Morning America.
” Notice how they not only attack Levin for pointing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but also tie him to QAnon ?
This is a hit job if I ever saw one .
I get so tired of these sleazy know-nothing “ reporters ” like the New York Times clown Tiffany Hsu .
The CDC data is clear .
I did not make it up .
It states that 6 % of the now over 200,000 of those who died of the coronavirus died just from the virus , while 94 % had comorbidities — that is , 94 % had life-threatening underlying issues such as severe heart @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The list of comorbidities is also provided by the CDC . )
Obviously , 200,000 individuals did not die solely or even primarily from the coronavirus , but some subset of that number died from the coronavirus .
That ’ s simple , basic logic based on what the CDC data reports .
But for Tiffany Hsu and her employer , the New York Times , the 200,000 number is a milestone ; it is just too politically significant to let a “ right-wing radio star ” dare to challenge .
And , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same sentence , which I have absolutely no knowledge about and absolutely nothing to do with , just to create smoke , distract from the point , and attempt to denigrate me .
It won ’ t work .
But this is how the Holocaust-denying , 1619-project , anti-Semitic New York Times deals with a very serious topic .
Moreover , Tiffany Hsu wouldn ’ t have known what I posted on my social sites but for the fact that she follows the Soros-connected Media Matters kook website , which took great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ war on the truth .
Tiffany Hsu also quotes Dr. Fauci ( yes , the same man who has been wrong about models , data , masks , and the threat of the virus from early on ) , who did not generate this data but is the go-to guy for the media on all things .
Fauci said : “ That does not mean someone with hypertension or diabetes , who dies of COVID didn ’ t die of COVID-19 , they did.
” Now , think about what Fauci said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( approximately 180,000 at the time ) .
Fauci didn ’ t look at anything but the same aggregated numbers the rest of us are looking at .
And yet , his statement in no way supports the conclusion that every single one of the over 200,000 individuals who died , died as a result of the coronavirus .
It is an absurdly misleading statement .
Where is his “ scientific evidence ” for such a conclusion .
There is none .
Tiffany Hsu , her employer , and too many others who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have no idea either .
Then she further stretches and quotes a South Carolina health office that draws the same conclusion as Fauci .
That ’ s it .
That ’ s the best she can do to attempt to counter the undeniable facts and only rational conclusion — that to say over 200,000 people have died from the coronavirus is factually and scientifically false .
Folks , this is a matter of basic facts versus propaganda .
It says a lot that a hack for the New York Times , would follow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which publishes trash all the time , rather than honestly approach the data and the science .
You can draw your own conclusions but it seems obvious to me .
This piece by Tiffany Hsu is the same kind of garbage we ’ ve been getting from Facebook and the reason they crippled my page .
Even if someone like Levin quotes directly from what top sources have said , like the CDC , he ’ s accused of misinterpreting the data and smeared because of it .
These self-appointed arbitrators of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people on the right so that people won ’ t listen to them anymore and future Donald Trump ’ s won ’ t get elected .
That ’ s what this is really about .

The New York Times attacked Mark Levin yesterday for speaking the truth about the real number of COVID-19 deaths:
When the coronavirus death toll in the United States passed 200,000 on Tuesday, matching projections made by White House experts this spring, many of the right-wing media personalities who had mocked the estimates as overblown were quiet. The death toll, tracked by Johns Hopkins University and a New York Times database, is most likely an undercount, many public health experts believe. At least 266,000 more people have died in the United States during the pandemic than would have been the case during a typical year. Mark Levin, the host of a syndicated radio show and a Fox News program, declared on Twitter on Wednesday that “THE U.S. DID NOT SURPASS 200,000 COVID-19 DEATHS.” As evidence, he cited data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showing that 94 percent of the reported deaths involved underlying health problems and that 6 percent of the people who died had no illness or medical condition other than Covid-19. Mr. Levin was one of several popular radio hosts who have used the C.D.C. statistic to make a case that the pandemic death toll was inflated, a false claim that was also promoted by a supporter of the QAnon conspiracy theory and amplified by President Trump in a post that Twitter removed last month. Health experts have repeatedly debunked that interpretation of the data. Earlier this month, Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the country’s leading infectious disease expert, tried to clear up any misconceptions during an appearance on “Good Morning America.”
Notice how they not only attack Levin for pointing out exactly what the CDC said, but also tie him to QAnon? This is a hit job if I ever saw one.
Levin fired back this morning:
I get so tired of these sleazy know-nothing “reporters” like the New York Times clown Tiffany Hsu. The CDC data is clear. I did not make it up. It states that 6% of the now over 200,000 of those who died of the coronavirus died just from the virus, while 94% had comorbidities — that is, 94% had life-threatening underlying issues such as severe heart disease, diabetes, etc. (The list of comorbidities is also provided by the CDC.) Obviously, 200,000 individuals did not die solely or even primarily from the coronavirus, but some subset of that number died from the coronavirus. That’s simple, basic logic based on what the CDC data reports. But for Tiffany Hsu and her employer, the New York Times, the 200,000 number is a milestone; it is just too politically significant to let a “right-wing radio star” dare to challenge. And, of course, she mentions QAnon in the same sentence, which I have absolutely no knowledge about and absolutely nothing to do with, just to create smoke, distract from the point, and attempt to denigrate me. It won’t work. But this is how the Holocaust-denying, 1619-project, anti-Semitic New York Times deals with a very serious topic. Moreover, Tiffany Hsu wouldn’t have known what I posted on my social sites but for the fact that she follows the Soros-connected Media Matters kook website, which took great offense at my post, given its war on the truth. Tiffany Hsu also quotes Dr. Fauci (yes, the same man who has been wrong about models, data, masks, and the threat of the virus from early on), who did not generate this data but is the go-to guy for the media on all things. Fauci said: “That does not mean someone with hypertension or diabetes, who dies of COVID didn’t die of COVID-19, they did.” Now, think about what Fauci said. The CDC looked at every death certificate (approximately 180,000 at the time). Fauci didn’t look at anything but the same aggregated numbers the rest of us are looking at. And yet, his statement in no way supports the conclusion that every single one of the over 200,000 individuals who died, died as a result of the coronavirus. It is an absurdly misleading statement. Where is his “scientific evidence” for such a conclusion. There is none. Tiffany Hsu, her employer, and too many others who pretend to be reporters rather than advocates have no idea either. Then she further stretches and quotes a South Carolina health office that draws the same conclusion as Fauci. That’s it. That’s the best she can do to attempt to counter the undeniable facts and only rational conclusion — that to say over 200,000 people have died from the coronavirus is factually and scientifically false. Folks, this is a matter of basic facts versus propaganda. It says a lot that a hack for the New York Times, would follow the lead of a radical leftwing website, which publishes trash all the time, rather than honestly approach the data and the science. You can draw your own conclusions but it seems obvious to me.
This piece by Tiffany Hsu is the same kind of garbage we’ve been getting from Facebook and the reason they crippled my page. Even if someone like Levin quotes directly from what top sources have said, like the CDC, he’s accused of misinterpreting the data and smeared because of it. These self-appointed arbitrators of the truth want to destroy the reputations of people on the right so that people won’t listen to them anymore and future Donald Trump’s won’t get elected.
That’s what this is really about.


therightscoop--2020-09-27--WATCH LIVE: President Trump holds Great American Comeback rally in Middletown, PA after SCOTUS nomin

WATCH LIVE: President Trump holds Great American Comeback rally in Middletown, PA after SCOTUS nomination

President Donald Trump is speaking tonight at a rally in Middletown , Pennsylvania .
The rally comes just hours after @ @ @ @ @ Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court .
That will definitely be on the topic @ @ @ @ @ and Kamala , of course , and whatever else he can do to make sure @ @ @ @ @ jerks have to stay up late writing copy .
Watch live below from Right Side @ @ @ @ @

President Donald Trump is speaking tonight at a rally in Middletown, Pennsylvania. The rally comes just hours after his official announcement nominating Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.
That will definitely be on the topic list, along with Biden and Kamala, of course, and whatever else he can do to make sure the Sunday morning talk show jerks have to stay up late writing copy.
Watch live below from Right Side Broadcasting or Fox News.
Enjoy!


therightscoop--2020-09-27--‘SPEAK LOUDLY’: Kamala Harris calls BLM street protests, which become RIOTS every night, a FIGHT and

‘SPEAK LOUDLY’: Kamala Harris calls BLM street protests, which become RIOTS every night, a FIGHT and ESSENTIAL

Kamala Harris loves the BLM and Antifa protests .
We know that , because all Democrats do .
But she calls the riot movement we see across the country every night , the one that just resulted in cops being shot and people throwing Molotov cocktails , an “ essential ” part of America .
“ It is about , I think , a community and the country speaking out , understanding that nothing that we have achieved that has been about progress in this country has come without a fight , ” she said .
She ’ s saying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ fight ” and she means it the way I ’ m saying it .
A violent struggle .
And she calls that “ essential ” and “ necessary.
” “ It is often the people who must speak to get their government to do what it is supposed to do but may not do naturally unless they speak loudly , ” said Harris .
She then threw in at the very end “ and obviously peacefully.
” Which is not at all obvious .
Besides she doesn ’ t even condemn any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because like the rest of the Democrats she is IN FAVOR of it .
And she ’ s willing to pay and encourage others to pay for that violence to continue .
This is her saying “ keep doing it.
” If Trump said this about some right-wingers they would say he ’ s dog whistling or whatever , but his would be even harder to make out because he ’ s unclear even when he wants to be clear .
But Kamala is not unclear here one teensy bit .
She ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden rioting .

Kamala Harris loves the BLM and Antifa protests. We know that, because all Democrats do. But she calls the riot movement we see across the country every night, the one that just resulted in cops being shot and people throwing Molotov cocktails, an “essential” part of America.
“It is about, I think, a community and the country speaking out, understanding that nothing that we have achieved that has been about progress in this country has come without a fight,” she said.
She’s saying out loud that it’s a “fight” and she means it the way I’m saying it. A violent struggle. And she calls that “essential” and “necessary.”
“It is often the people who must speak to get their government to do what it is supposed to do but may not do naturally unless they speak loudly,” said Harris. She then threw in at the very end “and obviously peacefully.” Which is not at all obvious.
Besides she doesn’t even condemn any of the violence. That’s because like the rest of the Democrats she is IN FAVOR of it. And she’s willing to pay and encourage others to pay for that violence to continue.
Watch, from CSPAN.
This is her saying “keep doing it.” If Trump said this about some right-wingers they would say he’s dog whistling or whatever, but his would be even harder to make out because he’s unclear even when he wants to be clear.
But Kamala is not unclear here one teensy bit. She’s telling the Biden rioters to keep Biden rioting.


therightscoop--2020-09-26--Old white male Schumer scolds young Catholic mother and legal scholar Barrett as a SETBACK for WOMEN

Old white male Schumer scolds young Catholic mother and legal scholar Barrett as a SETBACK for WOMEN’S RIGHTS

You really can ’ t even make fun of Democrats anymore .
They make fun of themselves every time they @ @ @ @ @ ’ re walking parodies that could have been written by the Babylon Bee .
That @ @ @ @ @ .
His statement on the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett is preposterous .
“ Should @ @ @ @ @ , a far-right majority on the court could also turn back the clock women ’ @ @ @ @ @ 69-year-old man .
“ Justice Ginsburg ’ s dying wish was that she not be @ @ @ @ @ is installed .
Republicans are poised to not only ignore her wishes , but to @ @ @ @ @ could tear down everything that she built.
” This is going to be one heckuva @ @ @ @ @ .
And they ’ re going to make complete asses of themselves .
They ’ @ @ @ @ @ of Praise ” trending and Twitter is swimming in anti-Catholic bigotry and it hasn ’ @ @ @ @ @ since she was named .

You really can’t even make fun of Democrats anymore. They make fun of themselves every time they open their mouths. They’re walking parodies that could have been written by the Babylon Bee.
That’s Chuck Schumer especially. His statement on the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett is preposterous.
“Should Amy Coney Barrett be confirmed, a far-right majority on the court could also turn back the clock women’s rights” said the 69-year-old man.
“Justice Ginsburg’s dying wish was that she not be replaced until a new president is installed. Republicans are poised to not only ignore her wishes, but to replace her with someone who could tear down everything that she built.”
Ridiculous.
Sixty-nine-year old male U.S. Senate Minority Leader informs the nation that a 48-year-old female judge, mom, and universally-admired professional is itching to join a conspiracy to "turn back the clock on women's rights." https://t.co/AltT5HKjnM — Andrew Quinn (@AndrewCQuinn) September 26, 2020
This is going to be one heckuva fight, y’all. And they’re going to make complete asses of themselves. They’ve already got “People of Praise” trending and Twitter is swimming in anti-Catholic bigotry and it hasn’t even been an hour since she was named.


therightscoop--2020-09-26--WATCH: President Trump Announces Supreme Court Nomination – Amy Coney Barrett

President Trump is announcing his nominee to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court .
Despite all the haranguing @ @ @ @ @ and the left , he ’ s performing this task , given him by the @ @ @ @ @ and appropriate fashion .
This is a huge and important move , and the name @ @ @ @ @ definitely going to be Amy Coney Barrett , which is darn good news .
Watch @ @ @ @ @ : Or here , from Fox News Channel .
I ’ m pretty well het @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t know about y ’ all .
UPDATE : Yep it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ Get ready for the war zone .
Gird your loins .

President Trump is announcing his nominee to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. Despite all the haranguing and bellyaching from the Dems and the left, he’s performing this task, given him by the Constitution, in a timely and appropriate fashion.
This is a huge and important move, and the name he says is pretty much definitely going to be Amy Coney Barrett, which is darn good news.
Watch here from the White House:
Or here, from Fox News Channel.
I’m pretty well het up with anticipation here, don’t know about y’all.
UPDATE: Yep it’s Amy Coney Barrett!! Get ready for the war zone. Gird your loins.


therightscoop--2020-09-26--HOT MIC! Watch and LISTEN as unidentified mayor LAUGHS at Joe Biden during speech to Conference of M

HOT MIC! Watch and LISTEN as unidentified mayor LAUGHS at Joe Biden during speech to Conference of Mayors

This is great .
Joe Biden gave a long , boring , barely audible , half-asleep set of remarks to @ @ @ @ @ Mayors over remote connection today , and as he was wrapping up , someone on @ @ @ @ @ mayor of LOUISVILLE ) can be heard laughing as Biden makes a crazy , pandering @ @ @ @ @ you I ’ ll have your back , ” said Biden .
“ I mean @ @ @ @ @ my record , I have .
And I want to make sure that your ideas @ @ @ @ @ funneled up .
They don ’ t have to go through a state legislature , @ @ @ @ @ “ They can go straight to the federal government , straight to me , ” @ @ @ @ @ point you hear the chuckling .
“ I really mean it , ” Biden continues @ @ @ @ @ .
The mayor who then takes the virtual mic and thanks Biden is the mayor @ @ @ @ @ knows if he was the one chuckling or not .

This is great. Joe Biden gave a long, boring, barely audible, half-asleep set of remarks to the United States Conference of Mayors over remote connection today, and as he was wrapping up, someone on the line (possibly the mayor of LOUISVILLE) can be heard laughing as Biden makes a crazy, pandering promise.
“I promise you I’ll have your back,” said Biden. “I mean that sincerely. Look at my record, I have. And I want to make sure that your ideas are the ones that are funneled up. They don’t have to go through a state legislature, go through a governor.”
“They can go straight to the federal government, straight to me,” says Biden, at which point you hear the chuckling.
“I really mean it,” Biden continues, as the laughing increases.
WATCH AND LISTEN:
The mayor who then takes the virtual mic and thanks Biden is the mayor of Louisville. But who knows if he was the one chuckling or not.


therightscoop--2020-09-26--Leftist Dem Operatives, with MSM help, attack Amy Coney Barrett’s FAMILY, smear over ADOPTING CHILDR

Leftist Dem Operatives, with MSM help, attack Amy Coney Barrett’s FAMILY, smear over ADOPTING CHILDREN

We keep telling y ’ all there ’ s no depth they won ’ t delve .
No low is too low , including trying to suggest there ’ s something suspicious or creepy about ADOPTING KIDS .
That ’ s what the left is doing now , enabled and encouraged by the CNN Media complex .
You can bet the Fat , Dumb , and Bald Guy won ’ t have a cross word to say about it tomorrow .
He won ’ t be able to claim ignorance , both Josh Hawley and Tom Cotton , among many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CNN won ’ t care .
Look at this .
According to his LinkedIn page , Houle is a former campaign manager to several top Democrats like former Rep. Paul Hodes ( D-NH ) and current Rep. Jim Himes ( D-CT ) .
He also was Hodes ’ chief of staff in Congress .
On his website , Houle describes himself as an effective Democrat operative who has taken out sitting Republicans .
And that ’ s not all .
Ted Cruz shared a tweet ( by screenshot , thank goodness ) from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worked on a few political campaigns , including the less than successful bid by pro-abortion heroine Wendy Davis .
He has also worked with NARAL , and is a board member of Men4Choice .
So it seems understandable that a pro-abort figure would be upset over adoptions .
Guess he wasn ’ t too proud of his work , though .
This was the best response .
Amen to that thought , but then again there ’ s nothing they can do that is totally unexpected .
Unless they somehow act decent .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of that happening , now is there ?

We keep telling y’all there’s no depth they won’t delve. No low is too low, including trying to suggest there’s something suspicious or creepy about ADOPTING KIDS.
That’s what the left is doing now, enabled and encouraged by the CNN Media complex. You can bet the Fat, Dumb, and Bald Guy won’t have a cross word to say about it tomorrow. He won’t be able to claim ignorance, both Josh Hawley and Tom Cotton, among many others, have objected. Still, CNN won’t care.
Look at this.
Read this from Democrat activist & Hill staffer. Questioning whether #AmyConeyBarrett *illegally* adopted her children from Haiti, maybe snatching them from birth parents! This is the Dem gameplan. Nothing but raw bigotry and hate. I promise you, this will not stand pic.twitter.com/JEMqhe05dY — Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) September 26, 2020
Disgusting. The left now smearing Amy Coney Barrett for adopting children. pic.twitter.com/zFomehwwDW — Tom Cotton (@TomCottonAR) September 25, 2020
Breitbart notes:
According to his LinkedIn page, Houle is a former campaign manager to several top Democrats like former Rep. Paul Hodes (D-NH) and current Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT). He also was Hodes’ chief of staff in Congress. On his website, Houle describes himself as an effective Democrat operative who has taken out sitting Republicans.
And that’s not all. Ted Cruz shared a tweet (by screenshot, thank goodness) from another despicable Dem operative.
Another Dem operative attacking Judge Barrett’s young kids. Disgraceful. Partisan hatred shouldn’t override human decency. pic.twitter.com/pZ3yYzUFhd — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) September 26, 2020
Twitchy writes:
Brougher has worked on a few political campaigns, including the less than successful bid by pro-abortion heroine Wendy Davis. He has also worked with NARAL, and is a board member of Men4Choice. So it seems understandable that a pro-abort figure would be upset over adoptions.
Guess he wasn’t too proud of his work, though.
LMAO. Deleted, then he went protected. pic.twitter.com/G3aLPnPbbz — Mo Mo (@MollyRatty) September 26, 2020
This was the best response.
i’m going to be completely honest, and maybe this was naïve of me, but I did not see “Amy Coney Barrett kidnapped her children from Haiti” oppo coming. https://t.co/OV7ZLr2cMB — Dawn (@aurora_g96) September 25, 2020
Amen to that thought, but then again there’s nothing they can do that is totally unexpected. Unless they somehow act decent. But ain’t a big risk of that happening, now is there?


therightscoop--2020-09-26--Amy Coney Barrett anti-religion HATE-fest is ON, Bill Maher out FRONT; Turley DESTROYS

Today it is a virtual certainty that President Trump will announce his selection of Amy Coney Barrett to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court .
For over a week the CNN media has been attacking her and attacking her religion because the left opposes God and they hate people who believe in God .
Especially Catholics .
Oh but what about Obama and Biden going to church , Fred ?
Yeah , that ’ s a scam .
Don ’ t believe they hate religion ?
If you somehow missed their attacks on George W. Bush ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of his believing in the rapture and Revelation , and you also somehow missed their attacks on Mitt Romney and Mormons and you also missed the many TV shows that mock Jesus and Christians in ways they would never DARE to breathe about when it comes to Islam and Muslims , then at least be convinced by what is happening right now before your eyes .
Bill Maher said it out loud .
But I don ’ t have to respond to this , because Jonathan Turley did it faster and better .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ unglued with a attack on Judge Barrett , objecting that she is ‘ really , really Catholic — like speaking in tongues.
’ The raving assault ( which even bizarrely tied in Stormy Daniels ) shows the triumph of rage over reason , ’ said Turley this morning .
Few Supreme Court nominees , let alone a still unnamed nominee , have been labeled as threatening to reduce all women to handmaiden birthing machines in a theocratic hellscape .
Of course , the extraordinary career of Barrett should be a celebration of feminism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her law class , became a national thought leader , and ascended to one of the highest courts in the nation .
She did that in her career while raising seven children , including two children adopted from Haiti .
Read the rest y ’ all .
Every word .
This is an important article .
Anti-Catholic bigotry goes back a long way in this country , and the modern left sees nothing wrong with it .
They don ’ t even consider it bigotry .
It ’ s allowed and celebrated and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CNN by folks like Jake Tapper and the Fat , Dumb , and Bald Guy and the rest of them .
Also this one is good .
By the way it ’ s not just being Catholic that has them mad .
They also hate that she wants children to live good and happy lives .
They know no bounds .

Today it is a virtual certainty that President Trump will announce his selection of Amy Coney Barrett to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. For over a week the CNN media has been attacking her and attacking her religion because the left opposes God and they hate people who believe in God. Especially Catholics.
Oh but what about Obama and Biden going to church, Fred? Yeah, that’s a scam.
Don’t believe they hate religion? If you somehow missed their attacks on George W. Bush’s faith in the Bible and making fun of his believing in the rapture and Revelation, and you also somehow missed their attacks on Mitt Romney and Mormons and you also missed the many TV shows that mock Jesus and Christians in ways they would never DARE to breathe about when it comes to Islam and Muslims, then at least be convinced by what is happening right now before your eyes.
Bill Maher said it out loud.
But I don’t have to respond to this, because Jonathan Turley did it faster and better.
“Last night, Bill Maher came unglued with a attack on Judge Barrett, objecting that she is ‘really, really Catholic — like speaking in tongues.’ The raving assault (which even bizarrely tied in Stormy Daniels) shows the triumph of rage over reason,’ said Turley this morning.
……when Ginsburg (a devout Jew) was nominated Feinstein did not object that "The dogma lives loudly in you" and commentators like Maher did not portray her as a barking religious fanatic or question whether she approves of condoms… — Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) September 26, 2020
……Imagine if a conservative commentator responded to President Obama's nomination of Kagan or Sotomayor by referring to sex with a stripper or referring to Kagan a "really, really Jewish." To paraphrase Sen. Feinstein, "[Prejudice] lives loudly in you." — Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) September 26, 2020
From the linked article:
Few Supreme Court nominees, let alone a still unnamed nominee, have been labeled as threatening to reduce all women to handmaiden birthing machines in a theocratic hellscape. Of course, the extraordinary career of Barrett should be a celebration of feminism. She graduated at the top of her law class, became a national thought leader, and ascended to one of the highest courts in the nation. She did that in her career while raising seven children, including two children adopted from Haiti.
Read the rest y’all. Every word. This is an important article.
Anti-Catholic bigotry goes back a long way in this country, and the modern left sees nothing wrong with it. They don’t even consider it bigotry. It’s allowed and celebrated and talked about like good policy discussion on CNN by folks like Jake Tapper and the Fat, Dumb, and Bald Guy and the rest of them.
Also this one is good.
By the way it’s not just being Catholic that has them mad. They also hate that she wants children to live good and happy lives.
So the Democrat attacks on ACB for adopting children from Haiti have already begun- Take note, America. Watch closely.
The Left is going to show you that it’s a morally bankrupt, vicious creed The vengeful will of an angry mob, with the selfish mind of a spoiled child — Buck Sexton (@BuckSexton) September 26, 2020
They know no bounds.