therightscoop--2020-12-17--Strzok STOKED it: Slew of new internal FBI messages, txts show they WERE gunning for Trump OBVIOUSLY

OA whole new set of internal FBI messages from Peter Strzok were declassified by the the Justice Department and then released on Thursday by Congressional Republicans , and it ’ s a big bag of doozies .
The documents were reviewed by the Daily Caller , which says they are a source of “ new insights into the thinking of investigators who worked on Crossfire Hurricane.
” Strzok ’ s messages , which are from the FBI ’ s Lync system , also contain numerous references to Christopher Steele , the former British spy whose dossier the FBI used to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( RELATED : Mueller Found No Collusion ) One message suggests that Strzok knew early on that Steele was a source for a story published in Yahoo !
News alleging that Page had a secret meeting in Moscow with two Kremlin insiders .
“ Looking at the Yahoo article , I would definitely say at a minimum Steele ’ s reports should be viewed as intended to influence as well as to inform , ” Strzok wrote on Sept. 23 , 2016 .
Strzok basically admitted he ’ d surmised Steele was behind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — and yet , as the Caller points out , “ the FBI maintained its relationship with Steele and failed to inform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ( FISC ) that the ex-spy had contact with journalists.
” The Federalist adds that the documents indicate “ the FBI began investigating then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and his campaign before the Crossfire Hurricane investigation was opened.
” While the FBI claims that investigations into Trump ’ s campaign began with the opening of Crossfire Hurricane on July 31 , 2016 , communications between Strzok and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lisa Page , show that the agent asked Page to discuss “ [ o ] ur open C [ counter- ] I [ ntelligence ] investigations relating to Trump ’ s Russian connections ” with him on July 28 , 2016 .
Corporate media such as the New York Times suggested that there was no evidence that agents like Strzok were “ eager to investigate Mr. Trump ’ s campaign ” and that it was former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos ’ s comments that sparked the investigation .
Former FBI Director James @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ sometime towards the end of September 2016.
” And of course , no FBI investigation would be complete without being in bed with CNN .
Strzok ’ s messages also show that he and others at the FBI had inside information about CNN ’ s plans to publish a story about then-FBI Director James Comey ’ s briefing to Trump regarding allegations in the dossier .
“ Story no longer Sciutto , now Evan Perez .
Internal nervousness about nature of allegations , ” Strzok wrote to Page on Jan. 9 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Also Carl Bernstein ( yes that Carl ) called OPA , said he got a ‘ dossier ’ from McCain.
” CNN reported on Jan. 10 , 2017 , that Comey had briefed Trump on Jan. 6 , 2017 , regarding an allegation in the dossier that the Kremlin had a sexual blackmail tape against Trump .
CNN ’ s report prompted BuzzFeed News to publish the dossier in full .
Federalist ’ s Jordan Davidson says , “ In addition to stoking the investigation into Russian collusion , Strzok is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ investigation into former National Security Advisor Gen. Michael Flynn even though an FBI memorandum previously closed the case after “ no derogatory information was identified in FBI holdings.
” Strzok was doing exactly what the media , CNN in particular , keep saying he wasn ’ t doing .
And the people Strzok targeted were NOT doing what CNN and friends say they were .
This is the real collusion .
It ’ s pretty stunning that they get away with this stuff so completely .
Maybe I should put a z in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away with stuff too ?
FredzT ?
Definitely something to think about .

OA whole new set of internal FBI messages from Peter Strzok were declassified by the the Justice Department and then released on Thursday by Congressional Republicans, and it’s a big bag of doozies.
The documents were reviewed by the Daily Caller, which says they are a source of “new insights into the thinking of investigators who worked on Crossfire Hurricane.”
Strzok’s messages, which are from the FBI’s Lync system, also contain numerous references to Christopher Steele, the former British spy whose dossier the FBI used to obtain surveillance warrants against Carter Page. (RELATED: Mueller Found No Collusion) One message suggests that Strzok knew early on that Steele was a source for a story published in Yahoo! News alleging that Page had a secret meeting in Moscow with two Kremlin insiders. “Looking at the Yahoo article, I would definitely say at a minimum Steele’s reports should be viewed as intended to influence as well as to inform,” Strzok wrote on Sept. 23, 2016.
Strzok basically admitted he’d surmised Steele was behind that article — a fact later confirmed — and yet, as the Caller points out, “the FBI maintained its relationship with Steele and failed to inform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) that the ex-spy had contact with journalists.”
The Federalist adds that the documents indicate “the FBI began investigating then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and his campaign before the Crossfire Hurricane investigation was opened.”
Before.
While the FBI claims that investigations into Trump’s campaign began with the opening of Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016, communications between Strzok and his alleged mistress, FBI special counsel Lisa Page, show that the agent asked Page to discuss “[o]ur open C[counter-]I[ntelligence] investigations relating to Trump’s Russian connections” with him on July 28, 2016. Corporate media such as the New York Times suggested that there was no evidence that agents like Strzok were “eager to investigate Mr. Trump’s campaign” and that it was former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos’s comments that sparked the investigation. Former FBI Director James Comey denied knowledge of any investigation until “sometime towards the end of September 2016.”
And of course, no FBI investigation would be complete without being in bed with CNN.
Strzok’s messages also show that he and others at the FBI had inside information about CNN’s plans to publish a story about then-FBI Director James Comey’s briefing to Trump regarding allegations in the dossier. “Story no longer Sciutto, now Evan Perez. Internal nervousness about nature of allegations,” Strzok wrote to Page on Jan. 9, 2017, referring to two CNN reporters. “Also Carl Bernstein (yes that Carl) called OPA, said he got a ‘dossier’ from McCain.” “Awesome,” Page replied. “Let Carl run it down then.” CNN reported on Jan. 10, 2017, that Comey had briefed Trump on Jan. 6, 2017, regarding an allegation in the dossier that the Kremlin had a sexual blackmail tape against Trump. CNN’s report prompted BuzzFeed News to publish the dossier in full.
Federalist’s Jordan Davidson says, “In addition to stoking the investigation into Russian collusion, Strzok is also responsible for reopening a criminal counterintelligence investigation into former National Security Advisor Gen. Michael Flynn even though an FBI memorandum previously closed the case after “no derogatory information was identified in FBI holdings.”
Strzok was doing exactly what the media, CNN in particular, keep saying he wasn’t doing. And the people Strzok targeted were NOT doing what CNN and friends say they were.
This is the real collusion. It’s pretty stunning that they get away with this stuff so completely.
Maybe I should put a z in the middle of my name and get away with stuff too? FredzT? Definitely something to think about.


therightscoop--2020-12-17--Top medical journal DEMANDS birth certificates DENY SCIENCE, not ‘assign’ gender

The New England Journal of Medicine says America must remove “ gender assignments ” on birth certificates , because of how much it hurts the feelings of wokes .
That ’ s not the exact words , but it ’ s actually pretty darn close to what they actually said .
“ Sex designations on birth certificates offer no clinical utility , ” they lie , “ and they can be harmful for intersex and transgender people.
” No utility ?
No WONDER libs can ’ t tell who is and isn ’ t a doctor .
The majority of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reasoning , not science , even going so far as to wade into the gender specific bathroom debate .
Eventually they have to make some kind of lackluster token effort at medical justification , which you read an excerpt from below , via The Blaze : Designating sex as male or female on birth certificates suggests that sex is simple and binary when , biologically , it is not .
Sex is a function of multiple biologic processes with many resultant combinations .
About 1 in 5000 people have intersex variations .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chimerism , mosaicism , or micromosaicism , conditions in which a person ’ s cells may contain varying sex chromosomes , often unbeknownst to them .
2 The biologic processes responsible for sex are incompletely defined , and there is no universally accepted test for determining sex .
“ Sex is a function of multiple biologic processes with many resultant combinations , ” this is blatant doubletalk .
Yes , the fact that you have a wang ain ’ t the only thing that makes you a dude .
There are a lot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s not an argument AGAINST specific gender , it ’ s an argument FOR it .
Men and women are different , not just in the crotch but in the ribs and the muscle mass and the average height and the chromosomes and the DNA and the … .
well you see what I ’ m saying .
“ there is no universally accepted test for determining sex ” is an even bigger joke .
The woke “ science ” community — you know : libs — have systematically destroyed all possibility of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ basic biological truths and inarguable premises , and deliberately creating a haze and “ spectrum ” out of political motivations .
Then to turn around and claim this artificially created confusion is inherent and the CAUSE of the woke point of view is flat out gaslighting .
The very small numbers of rare medical situations , the incidences of which they have inflated here by inclusion of minor defects which have no outward or internal impact on the person in question , are also no argument for tossing the “ utility ” of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whom no such defect exists .
It ’ s like saying there ’ s no such thing as people who can walk because some people can ’ t walk .
It ’ s asinine .
This is the world the liberals have made and are continuing to make .
When people say culture war , it ’ s important to remember that ’ s not trivial .
It is ultimately a war between truth and lies .
Between the world as God made it , and the world as liberals wish to remake @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It is us versus them .

The New England Journal of Medicine says America must remove “gender assignments” on birth certificates, because of how much it hurts the feelings of wokes.
That’s not the exact words, but it’s actually pretty darn close to what they actually said. “Sex designations on birth certificates offer no clinical utility,” they lie, “and they can be harmful for intersex and transgender people.”
No utility? No WONDER libs can’t tell who is and isn’t a doctor.
The majority of the article is about political and social reasoning, not science, even going so far as to wade into the gender specific bathroom debate.
Eventually they have to make some kind of lackluster token effort at medical justification, which you read an excerpt from below, via The Blaze:
Designating sex as male or female on birth certificates suggests that sex is simple and binary when, biologically, it is not. Sex is a function of multiple biologic processes with many resultant combinations. About 1 in 5000 people have intersex variations. As many as 1 in 100 people exhibit chimerism, mosaicism, or micromosaicism, conditions in which a person’s cells may contain varying sex chromosomes, often unbeknownst to them. 2 The biologic processes responsible for sex are incompletely defined, and there is no universally accepted test for determining sex.
“Sex is a function of multiple biologic processes with many resultant combinations,” this is blatant doubletalk. Yes, the fact that you have a wang ain’t the only thing that makes you a dude. There are a lot of other things too. That’s not an argument AGAINST specific gender, it’s an argument FOR it. Men and women are different, not just in the crotch but in the ribs and the muscle mass and the average height and the chromosomes and the DNA and the …. well you see what I’m saying.
“there is no universally accepted test for determining sex” is an even bigger joke. The woke “science” community — you know: libs — have systematically destroyed all possibility of such a test by refusing to accept basic biological truths and inarguable premises, and deliberately creating a haze and “spectrum” out of political motivations. Then to turn around and claim this artificially created confusion is inherent and the CAUSE of the woke point of view is flat out gaslighting.
The very small numbers of rare medical situations, the incidences of which they have inflated here by inclusion of minor defects which have no outward or internal impact on the person in question, are also no argument for tossing the “utility” of identifying gender for all the people for whom no such defect exists.
It’s like saying there’s no such thing as people who can walk because some people can’t walk. It’s asinine.
This is the world the liberals have made and are continuing to make. When people say culture war, it’s important to remember that’s not trivial. It is ultimately a war between truth and lies. Between the world as God made it, and the world as liberals wish to remake it. It is reality vs. fiction. It is us versus them.


therightscoop--2020-12-17--Media and Twitter circle wagons to protect ‘Doctor’ Jill from insults, destroy Rubio and the right f

Media and Twitter circle wagons to protect ‘Doctor’ Jill from insults, destroy Rubio and the right for REACTING to insults

There is almost nothing that Twitter or Google or Facebook can do to surprise conservatives anymore , and the pressure on them as Parler and Rumble are getting all the kinks out an increasingly rapid pace only seems to have made them even more likely to play politics for their side , not less .
For example , as Ryan Saavedra points out , the worlds largest instant social platform is doing something that , if a user were to do it would be against site policy : targeted harassment .
Exactly right .
The “ trending ” you see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ based only on algorithmic detection of lots of tweets .
It has been established over and over that their “ curators ” select less talked about stories based on the ideological bent .
And that ’ s what they ’ re doing here .
It is proscribed to refuse to play pretend doctor with Mrs. Biden , who clearly got her PhD .
in being Mrs. Biden , just like Hunter got his Ukraine and China-hD.s for being junior .
Twitter is exacting revenge on their behalf .
And it ’ s not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They have to do some double standards after all .
So while being outraged about “ disrespectful ” treatment of Biden , they ’ re CHEERING AND DEFENDING other , explicit disrespect .
All day they ’ ve had trending topics of liberals bashing Marco Rubio for bashing Biden deputy chief of staff Jen O ’ Malley Dillon for calling Trump supporters “ f**kers.
” They had big long explanations of why and how he was bad in the actual trending topic list , obviously written by Twitter .
Now y ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ might ask “ why are we surprised ?
How is this even news anymore ?
” But the answer ’ s simple , because this still matters and will for a while yet , and harassment of conservatives in public spaces by authorities , real ones or perceived ones , is a major front in the culture war .
It ’ s nuts to not call it out .

There is almost nothing that Twitter or Google or Facebook can do to surprise conservatives anymore, and the pressure on them as Parler and Rumble are getting all the kinks out an increasingly rapid pace only seems to have made them even more likely to play politics for their side, not less.
For example, as Ryan Saavedra points out, the worlds largest instant social platform is doing something that, if a user were to do it would be against site policy: targeted harassment.
This is Twitter’s way of directing harassment at someone who wrote something that they don’t approve of because it attacks a Democrat—the same Democrat they suppressed negative news stories about during the election. They are trying to silence people using intimidation. pic.twitter.com/vdZdBIOKTV — Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) December 17, 2020
Exactly right. The “trending” you see on the sidebar isn’t random based only on algorithmic detection of lots of tweets. It has been established over and over that their “curators” select less talked about stories based on the ideological bent. And that’s what they’re doing here.
It is proscribed to refuse to play pretend doctor with Mrs. Biden, who clearly got her PhD. in being Mrs. Biden, just like Hunter got his Ukraine and China-hD.s for being junior. Twitter is exacting revenge on their behalf.
And it’s not the only thing they’re doing. They have to do some double standards after all. So while being outraged about “disrespectful” treatment of Biden, they’re CHEERING AND DEFENDING other, explicit disrespect.
All day they’ve had trending topics of liberals bashing Marco Rubio for bashing Biden deputy chief of staff Jen O’Malley Dillon for calling Trump supporters “f**kers.” They had big long explanations of why and how he was bad in the actual trending topic list, obviously written by Twitter.
Now y’all, as Right Scoop readers, might ask “why are we surprised? How is this even news anymore?”
But the answer’s simple, because this still matters and will for a while yet, and harassment of conservatives in public spaces by authorities, real ones or perceived ones, is a major front in the culture war. It’s nuts to not call it out.


therightscoop--2020-12-17--Dana Loesch: “Conservatives, do NOT take the Mitch McConnell bait”

When I first saw Dana ’ s title to this clip , I thought she was going down a different @ @ @ @ @ , which was to tell people to stop blaming Mitch McConnell for congratulating Joe Biden @ @ @ @ @ , like most of us , hasn ’ t agreed with Mitch McConnell on many @ @ @ @ @ clip she comes to his defense in a strong way , saying that what happened @ @ @ @ @ fault and that people should stop piling on McConnell as if it were .
“ @ @ @ @ @ McConnell ’ s responsibility to do what Republican states failed to do ahead of the @ @ @ @ @ was saying months ago that Republicans needed to have lawyers in these states fighting what @ @ @ @ @ with mail-in ballots , and that their failure isn ’ t McConnell ’ s fault @ @ @ @ @ little time reminding people just how hard McConnell fought for Trump ’ s agenda , @ @ @ @ @ the video and let me know what you think below .

When I first saw Dana’s title to this clip, I thought she was going down a different road than what she did, which was to tell people to stop blaming Mitch McConnell for congratulating Joe Biden as president-elect:
Dana Loesch, like most of us, hasn’t agreed with Mitch McConnell on many things, but in this clip she comes to his defense in a strong way, saying that what happened in Georgia is not his fault and that people should stop piling on McConnell as if it were.
“It’s not Mitch McConnell’s responsibility to do what Republican states failed to do ahead of the election.”
Loesch said she was saying months ago that Republicans needed to have lawyers in these states fighting what Democrats were trying to do with mail-in ballots, and that their failure isn’t McConnell’s fault.
She also spends a little time reminding people just how hard McConnell fought for Trump’s agenda, which is compelling.
Watch the video and let me know what you think below.


therightscoop--2020-12-17--WATCH: Jenna Ellis explains how Trump can still win the election

Jenna Ellis was on with Joe Pags yesterday and walked everyone through how Trump can still win this election : Ellis suggested that the path for a Trump victory at this point lies with the state legislators recalling their electors and casting new ones .
The electors have voted already on Monday of this week , but Ellis said those electors aren ’ t certified yet and the Constitution allows for state legislators to cast the appropriate selection of state delegates if they deem the vote from the state untrustworthy .
Ellis says this isn ’ t about overturning the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the accurate votes that were cast .
“ When you have a state like Pennsylvania where the result was irredeemably compromised , what the Constitution provides for is that the state legislatures then meet together and they determine how to cast the electoral delegate votes .
And that is not a disenfranchisement of their constituents , they are the elected representatives of their constituents .
That ’ s the process of the Constitution to protect against corruption , against foreign influence… ” So basically all of this is riding on the courage of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to recall their electors and cast new ones to send to Congress on January 6th for certification .
This is why those hearings that Rudy and Jenna were doing in front of state legislatures in the past few weeks were so important .
It ’ s not just about future elections as I previously thought , but it can apparently still have a bearing on this election .
I must add though that just normal , everyday courage won ’ t be enough for a big task like this .
It would take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this gargantuan , because suddenly every one of them would become massive targets for the Democrat media complex and for angry liberals on social media .
Their worlds would be turned upside down , their families threatened , and massive protests would ensue if they recalled their electors and cast new ones that would vote for Trump .
Regardless of it being the right thing to do , they would be accused of stealing an election from Joe Biden and honestly , I just don ’ t see it happening .
But we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if it does .

Jenna Ellis was on with Joe Pags yesterday and walked everyone through how Trump can still win this election:
Ellis suggested that the path for a Trump victory at this point lies with the state legislators recalling their electors and casting new ones. The electors have voted already on Monday of this week, but Ellis said those electors aren’t certified yet and the Constitution allows for state legislators to cast the appropriate selection of state delegates if they deem the vote from the state untrustworthy.
Ellis says this isn’t about overturning the election results, but about getting to the accurate votes that were cast.
“When you have a state like Pennsylvania where the result was irredeemably compromised, what the Constitution provides for is that the state legislatures then meet together and they determine how to cast the electoral delegate votes. And that is not a disenfranchisement of their constituents, they are the elected representatives of their constituents. That’s the process of the Constitution to protect against corruption, against foreign influence…”
So basically all of this is riding on the courage of Republican state legislatures in these contested states to recall their electors and cast new ones to send to Congress on January 6th for certification.
This is why those hearings that Rudy and Jenna were doing in front of state legislatures in the past few weeks were so important. It’s not just about future elections as I previously thought, but it can apparently still have a bearing on this election.
I must add though that just normal, everyday courage won’t be enough for a big task like this. It would take heroic courage for state Republicans do something this gargantuan, because suddenly every one of them would become massive targets for the Democrat media complex and for angry liberals on social media. Their worlds would be turned upside down, their families threatened, and massive protests would ensue if they recalled their electors and cast new ones that would vote for Trump. Regardless of it being the right thing to do, they would be accused of stealing an election from Joe Biden and honestly, I just don’t see it happening. But we’ll be here to cover it if it does.
Watch the video for more…


therightscoop--2020-12-17--Sidney Powell’s case finally reaches the Supreme Court

Sidney Powell ’ s case challenging the election results in Michigan has finally reached the Supreme Court : Powell ’ @ @ @ @ @ week by an Obama-nominated federal judge , Linda V. Parker .
She then appealed the @ @ @ @ @ , and now it appears they ’ ve filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme @ @ @ @ @ been docketed .
Given the recent history with the Supreme Court not wanting to get @ @ @ @ @ I suspect they won ’ t hear this case either .
Let ’ s hope @ @ @ @ @ Powell told the Washington Examiner a few days ago that she has four cases “ @ @ @ @ @ in Michigan , Georgia , Wisconsin , and Arizona .
”

Sidney Powell’s case challenging the election results in Michigan has finally reached the Supreme Court:
REPORT: @SidneyPowell1's Lawsuit Seeking To Set Aside Allegedly Fraud Filled Election Results In #Michigan Is Docketed In The U.S. Supreme Court. The Suit Alleges More >200k Fraudulent Votes Were Cast In The States Election Thereby Nullifying The Results. https://t.co/EJBtjA8R8O — John Basham 🇺🇲 (@JohnBasham) December 17, 2020
Powell’s case was rejected last week by an Obama-nominated federal judge, Linda V. Parker. She then appealed the case to the sixth circuit, and now it appears they’ve filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court, which has now been docketed.
Given the recent history with the Supreme Court not wanting to get involved in the election, I suspect they won’t hear this case either. Let’s hope I’m wrong.
Powell told the Washington Examiner a few days ago that she has four cases “alleging substantial evidence of fraud in Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Arizona.”
You can read Powell’s filings here.


therightscoop--2020-12-17--Rand Paul comes out AGAINST appointing Special Counsel to investigate Hunter Biden business deals

Rand Paul has come out against a special counsel being appointed to investigate Hunter Biden : FOX NEWS – Sen. Rand Paul , R-Ky. , said Thursday that Hunter Biden “ deserves the same justice that Paul Manafort got ” but opposed appointing a special counsel to oversee the investigation into his tax affairs .
“ Hunter Biden deserves the same justice that Paul Manafort got .
Nothing less , nothing more , ” he said , referring to President Trump ’ s former campaign chairman who was imprisoned for various financial crimes .
Some Republicans have called for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden takes office to look into the matter , but Paul said he opposed it because those kinds of prosecutors were “ too powerful.
” Instead Paul calls on Biden to leave in place the US Attorney that is already investigating Hunter Biden : Responding to President-elect Joe Biden ’ s “ confident ” claim that his son did nothing criminal , Paul said he should show it by bucking tradition on new presidents removing all U.S. attorneys .
The younger Biden is under federal investigation for , among other things , his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s confident , he should leave in place the U.S. Attorney [ in Delaware ] who ’ s investigating Hunter Biden , ” Paul told “ Fox & Friends.
” “ Traditionally , when a new president comes in , they fire all the U.S. attorneys .
If he wants to show that this is going to be an upright , upstanding Biden administration … he needs to leave that U.S. attorney in place.
” Paul said if Biden did fire the prosecutor in the first weeks of his presidency , justice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must say I disagree with Paul on this one .
I believe a special counsel needs to be appointed , not because Hunter Biden himself was conducting overseas business deals , but because it was all apart of Joe Biden ’ s scheme to sell his influence .
As I mentioned on Twitter a few minutes ago when a hack reporter claimed that this is just payback for what was done to Trump : The media is garbage .
They refuse to see the forest for the trees because they don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to pretend that there is nothing illegitimate to the Biden crime family ’ s business deals , which Joe has been lying about for years now .
Regarding Paul ’ s challenge that Biden keep the US Attorney investigating his son to prove he ’ s confident , that ’ s a nice sentiment .
But he ’ s delusional if he believes that ’ s even a possibility .
As soon as Biden is inaugurated , his first act will be to fire U.S. Attorney Scott Brady in order to stop the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply another reason why we must have a special counsel to find out the truth here .

Rand Paul has come out against a special counsel being appointed to investigate Hunter Biden:
FOX NEWS – Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said Thursday that Hunter Biden “deserves the same justice that Paul Manafort got” but opposed appointing a special counsel to oversee the investigation into his tax affairs. “Hunter Biden deserves the same justice that Paul Manafort got. Nothing less, nothing more,” he said, referring to President Trump’s former campaign chairman who was imprisoned for various financial crimes. Some Republicans have called for the Justice Department appointing a special counsel before Biden takes office to look into the matter, but Paul said he opposed it because those kinds of prosecutors were “too powerful.”
Instead Paul calls on Biden to leave in place the US Attorney that is already investigating Hunter Biden:
Responding to President-elect Joe Biden’s “confident” claim that his son did nothing criminal, Paul said he should show it by bucking tradition on new presidents removing all U.S. attorneys. The younger Biden is under federal investigation for, among other things, his overseas business dealings. “If he’s confident, he should leave in place the U.S. Attorney [in Delaware] who’s investigating Hunter Biden,” Paul told “Fox & Friends.” “Traditionally, when a new president comes in, they fire all the U.S. attorneys. If he wants to show that this is going to be an upright, upstanding Biden administration … he needs to leave that U.S. attorney in place.” Paul said if Biden did fire the prosecutor in the first weeks of his presidency, justice wouldn’t be served.
I must say I disagree with Paul on this one. I believe a special counsel needs to be appointed, not because Hunter Biden himself was conducting overseas business deals, but because it was all apart of Joe Biden’s scheme to sell his influence.
As I mentioned on Twitter a few minutes ago when a hack reporter claimed that this is just payback for what was done to Trump:
What a hack. It's about Joe Biden using his crime family to sell his influence to commies and other corrupt governments in order to make millions. Ukraine was the perfect example, which the garbage media you're apart of ignored. That's why we need a special counsel! https://t.co/Xa8uV3haal — ✟ Right Scoop ✟ (@trscoop) December 17, 2020
The media is garbage. They refuse to see the forest for the trees because they don’t want to see it. They want to pretend that there is nothing illegitimate to the Biden crime family’s business deals, which Joe has been lying about for years now.
Regarding Paul’s challenge that Biden keep the US Attorney investigating his son to prove he’s confident, that’s a nice sentiment. But he’s delusional if he believes that’s even a possibility. As soon as Biden is inaugurated, his first act will be to fire U.S. Attorney Scott Brady in order to stop the investigation into his son. This is simply another reason why we must have a special counsel to find out the truth here.


therightscoop--2020-12-17--Richard Grenell TRUTH BOMBS reporter who refuses to care about Biden staffer calling Republicans ‘f*

Richard Grenell TRUTH BOMBS reporter who refuses to care about Biden staffer calling Republicans ‘f**kers’

This week it was revealed that Biden ’ s pick for Deputy White House Chief of Staff , Jen O ’ Malley Dillon , called Republicans ‘ f**kers in an interview with Glamour magazine , which stands in stark contrast to the message of unity Biden keeps mumbling about in speeches .
O ’ Malley was Biden ’ s campaign manager too , so you ’ d think she would be on top of the messaging : Then yesterday Axios reported that O ’ Malley ’ s comment frustrated some of Biden ’ s advisors because it muddles his unity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ give Republicans “ ammunition to cast doubt on Biden ’ s sincerity ” .
As if they needed any ?
Meanwhile , Biden ’ s spokeswoman came out to defend O ’ Malley and her ‘ spicy language ’ : Then you ’ ve got MSM reporters openly explaining this away , noting they could care less than Biden ’ s pick for Deputy White House Chief of Staff called Republicans f**kers .
Here ’ s Richard Grenell making light work of Sam Stein for coming up with such a stupid justification for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat hordes as a bunch of ‘ f**kers ’ , I guarantee you Sam Stein would find it a lot more interesting .
Stein is as biased as it gets and Grenell is absolutely right to call him out on it .
Lastly , you ’ ve got the disgraced former throuple representative from California echoing O ’ Malley ’ s comment , telling Republicans to stop being f**kers ’ so Biden can unite the country or something : That got a few responses…

This week it was revealed that Biden’s pick for Deputy White House Chief of Staff, Jen O’Malley Dillon, called Republicans ‘f**kers in an interview with Glamour magazine, which stands in stark contrast to the message of unity Biden keeps mumbling about in speeches. O’Malley was Biden’s campaign manager too, so you’d think she would be on top of the messaging:
Then yesterday Axios reported that O’Malley’s comment frustrated some of Biden’s advisors because it muddles his unity messaging. They worry that this will give Republicans “ammunition to cast doubt on Biden’s sincerity”. As if they needed any?
Meanwhile, Biden’s spokeswoman came out to defend O’Malley and her ‘spicy language’:
So @jomalleydillon would be the first to tell you her mom doesn’t approve of the spicy language, but I would be the first to tell you that the point she was making in this conversation with @GlennonDoyle is spot on: unity and healing are possible — and we can get things done. pic.twitter.com/HOVVDbY42K — Kate Bedingfield (@KBeds) December 16, 2020
Then you’ve got MSM reporters openly explaining this away, noting they could care less than Biden’s pick for Deputy White House Chief of Staff called Republicans f**kers. Here’s Richard Grenell making light work of Sam Stein for coming up with such a stupid justification for his bias:
The problem is that you ALWAYS come up with a reason to not criticize Democrats. Everyone sees the bias. Your colleagues in DC just like your bias so they RT and repeat you. You all have helped create the credibility crisis by pretending you aren’t biased. https://t.co/MxLa8OnrdF — Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) December 17, 2020
If Mark Meadows referred to Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat hordes as a bunch of ‘f**kers’, I guarantee you Sam Stein would find it a lot more interesting. Stein is as biased as it gets and Grenell is absolutely right to call him out on it.
Lastly, you’ve got the disgraced former throuple representative from California echoing O’Malley’s comment, telling Republicans to stop being f**kers’ so Biden can unite the country or something:
Because y’all are the biggest bunch of fuckers in history. Stop being that and unity/healing will be a hell of a lot easier. https://t.co/eJ41CJQiEw — Katie Hill (@KatieHill4CA) December 17, 2020
That got a few responses…
1. You actually f***ed half your staff.
2. Do u even history? https://t.co/7d2jFaRCFv — Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) December 17, 2020
Typical Democrat: Unity through hatred https://t.co/DQrcHtbwoZ — SUPER-SPREADER Dr.Nick Searcy,INT’L FILM & TV STAR (@yesnicksearcy) December 17, 2020
This is what I've been saying all along… When @thedemocrats are calling for unity, it's not them offering to meet Conservatives in the middle. It's the demand that we submit to their will. https://t.co/4fDIuM7XzX — Jeff Dornik (@JeffTheGK) December 17, 2020


therightscoop--2020-12-18--Stephen Colbert asks Joe Biden about Hunter Biden, but not in the way you’d hope…

Stephen Colbert interviewed Joe Biden last night and actually asked him about his son Hunter , but not in the way that most of us would have hoped .
Instead it was all about how Republicans might try and use his son against him : It continues with Colbert pressing Biden on whether he could actually work with Republicans who attack his son : This is the big interview CBS News was pushing yesterday and it ’ s garbage .
The media has only recently started reporting on Hunter ’ s misdeeds and his Chinese business dealings , including the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of an FBI investigation for money laundering , but Colbert can ’ t be bothered to actually ask Joe about that .
Rather , he treats the whole Hunter Biden scandal as if it ’ s fiction , only asking Joe about how those mean Republicans might use it against him .
I thought Colbert used to care about potential foreign interference ?
Oh right , only when it was a phony claim about Trump .
I bet he also didn ’ t ask Dr. Jill about her embarrassing dissertation .
The next @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Stephen Colbert interviewed Joe Biden last night and actually asked him about his son Hunter, but not in the way that most of us would have hoped. Instead it was all about how Republicans might try and use his son against him:
I know @StephenAtHome is an entertainer and not a journalist but this is still embarrassing. Rather than trying to break news about the FBI’s investigation into Hunter (which Biden himself is implicated in), Colbert asks him to go after Republicans making this an issue. pic.twitter.com/HjCEPOdap2 — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 18, 2020
It continues with Colbert pressing Biden on whether he could actually work with Republicans who attack his son:
It got worse. Colbert follows up asking how he can work w/ Republicans if they’re making Hunter an issue. Biden, in a rambling response, says if he were in high school he’d want to “go a round” Jill interjects: “But you have to take the high road" pic.twitter.com/7Jr5n3f6hM — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 18, 2020
This is the big interview CBS News was pushing yesterday and it’s garbage. The media has only recently started reporting on Hunter’s misdeeds and his Chinese business dealings, including the fact that he’s the subject of an FBI investigation for money laundering, but Colbert can’t be bothered to actually ask Joe about that. Rather, he treats the whole Hunter Biden scandal as if it’s fiction, only asking Joe about how those mean Republicans might use it against him. I thought Colbert used to care about potential foreign interference? Oh right, only when it was a phony claim about Trump.
I bet he also didn’t ask Dr. Jill about her embarrassing dissertation. The next four years are going to be grueling…


therightscoop--2020-12-19--Bill de Blasio says the lately out loud part EVEN OUT LOUDER: ‘I’d like to say very bluntly, Our mis

Bill de Blasio says the lately out loud part EVEN OUT LOUDER: ‘I’d like to say very bluntly, Our mission is to redistribute wealth.

“ A lot of people bristle at that phrase , ” said Bill de Blasio after stating “ very bluntly ” that the city ’ s mission post-BLM protests is to “ redistribute wealth.
” Democrats are fairly open about advocating socialism out loud these days , but you got ta admit just saying it right out like that is even more out loud that usual .
“ The work of reforming the NYPD , of deepening neighborhood policing , of changing police culture – that work must intensify and it will in the year 2021 , ” he said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is we can never accept a broken status quo , we can never go back to a past that didn ’ t work , the Covid era has taught us that so clearly , and we need to do better and we will , ” he continued , in a presser that was theoretically about the city ’ s plan for schools , and , you know , going back to school .
“ And that means a commitment to fighting disparities and inequality in every part of the life of New York @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brought up the “ problems of disparity ” and “ structural racism ” affecting so many things including education .
And then he said , specific to education but with the stated and explicit intent that it be understood to apply to all areas of life in New York City , that “ redistribution of wealth ” is the primary agenda item .
So there ’ s two things here .
He ’ s so dumb to put that out loud in a clip that can be trimmed and used , and I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and see it used against him .
He ’ s awesomely dumb and I ’ m just so darn grateful .
But it ’ s not just that it was a dumb move because it can be used as an isolated sound bite .
It ’ s saying what the principle involved is .
He said in his rambling preamble that this is all the same problem , that it ’ s the same for the police department as it is for education as it is for every other part of the city @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is redistribution of wealth .
So he doesn ’ t JUST mean , taking resources in the massive NY school system and shifting it between schools .
He ’ s saying clearly and explicitly that this is the underlying principle to fix “ structural racism ” and “ disparity ” among the city ’ s residents .
He ’ s saying communism .
He ’ s saying socialism is what works and that ’ s what they need .
It ’ s not a gaffe , like putting something wrong .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how words can be taken .
No , it ’ s a statement of principles .
He made it .
Every democrat in the country agrees .
But yeah go ahead and blow off the Georgia vote and lets get some MORE democrats in power .
That ’ ll help !

“A lot of people bristle at that phrase,” said Bill de Blasio after stating “very bluntly” that the city’s mission post-BLM protests is to “redistribute wealth.”
Democrats are fairly open about advocating socialism out loud these days, but you gotta admit just saying it right out like that is even more out loud that usual.
“The work of reforming the NYPD, of deepening neighborhood policing, of changing police culture – that work must intensify and it will in the year 2021,” he said on Friday.
“The bottom line is we can never accept a broken status quo, we can never go back to a past that didn’t work, the Covid era has taught us that so clearly, and we need to do better and we will,” he continued, in a presser that was theoretically about the city’s plan for schools, and, you know, going back to school. “And that means a commitment to fighting disparities and inequality in every part of the life of New York City.”
It’s then he brought up the “problems of disparity” and “structural racism” affecting so many things including education.
And then he said, specific to education but with the stated and explicit intent that it be understood to apply to all areas of life in New York City, that “redistribution of wealth” is the primary agenda item.
Watch:
So there’s two things here. He’s so dumb to put that out loud in a clip that can be trimmed and used, and I can’t wait to use it and see it used against him. He’s awesomely dumb and I’m just so darn grateful.
But it’s not just that it was a dumb move because it can be used as an isolated sound bite. It’s saying what the principle involved is. He said in his rambling preamble that this is all the same problem, that it’s the same for the police department as it is for education as it is for every other part of the city, and then he said the cure is redistribution of wealth.
So he doesn’t JUST mean, taking resources in the massive NY school system and shifting it between schools. He’s saying clearly and explicitly that this is the underlying principle to fix “structural racism” and “disparity” among the city’s residents.
He’s saying communism. He’s saying socialism is what works and that’s what they need. It’s not a gaffe, like putting something wrong. It’s not an error, like underestimating how words can be taken. No, it’s a statement of principles. He made it. Every democrat in the country agrees.
But yeah go ahead and blow off the Georgia vote and lets get some MORE democrats in power. That’ll help!


therightscoop--2020-12-19--‘Creepy’, ‘Peak Orwell’, ‘MARK OF THE BEAST’: Andrew Yang’s idea to BRAND us with vaccine barcode do

‘Creepy’, ‘Peak Orwell’, ‘MARK OF THE BEAST’: Andrew Yang’s idea to BRAND us with vaccine barcode does NOT go well

Former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang had a thought today he ought probably not to have shared , although I @ @ @ @ @ good he did so people can get in front of the tank and say NO @ @ @ @ @ should have to get branded by some method to prove they took the Covid vaccine @ @ @ @ @ sell well , OBVIOUSLY .
Tell y ’ all what : I ’ m getting @ @ @ @ @ ’ t like to mess around with some germs , but I ’ ll be @ @ @ @ @ putting a mark on myself to PROVE it .
And if you have to do @ @ @ @ @ former ?
Well I guess I ’ ll just learn to get comfy with germs @

Former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang had a thought today he ought probably not to have shared, although I guess it’s pretty good he did so people can get in front of the tank and say NO.
He suggested that people should have to get branded by some method to prove they took the Covid vaccine.
Is there a way for someone to easily show that they have been vaccinated – like a bar code they can download to their phone? There ought to be. — Andrew Yang🧢🇺🇸 (@AndrewYang) December 18, 2020
The idea did not sell well, OBVIOUSLY.
Might want to rethink this one before running for mayor of the city with the largest concentration of Jewish population in the country. — Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) December 18, 2020
Yet, we can’t require IDs to vote? Interesting. https://t.co/3hnocy8VNf — Buzz Patterson (@BuzzPatterson) December 18, 2020
Not just no, but hell no. https://t.co/vy4rYkyqA1 — Lauren Chen (@TheLaurenChen) December 18, 2020
How tf is this not peak Orwell https://t.co/FPKkHoK1sR — (@realWokeSheep) December 18, 2020
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your thought(less) question! Maybe there IS a way to show it! Would a tattoo on your forehead work for you?! How about a number on your forearm or a Yellow star for dissenters?!
Not if I can help it!#2ndAmendment https://t.co/wKssvz82sA — Rob Schneider (@RobSchneider) December 18, 2020
Begging for that Mark of the beast! https://t.co/CDep9Hr3La — Frank J McCall (@RealFrankJMcCa1) December 18, 2020
Just slap a tattoo on folks. Why not – what could go wrong? https://t.co/D1gCFAbkSD — Chip Roy (@chiproytx) December 18, 2020
No.. This is beginning to sound like the mark of the beast..666. A vaccine card is satisfactory https://t.co/f14nTqgVjj — Ferret4 (@Ferret45D) December 19, 2020
We do not want a barcode to prove this. Yikes! This is looking more and more like the mark of the beast. https://t.co/MXE5oFh65Q — Maria (@ccpetsitters11) December 18, 2020
Mark. Of. The. Beast. I don’t have to prove flu vaccination, nor any other vaccination. I’m not carrying proof of this one either. And if you push too many into a corner on this, I guarantee the survivors on the Left will not like the results at all. https://t.co/6NwOgURdG2 — Dr. President-Elect WitCoHE (@E__Strobel) December 18, 2020
Tell y’all what: I’m getting that vaccine because I don’t like to mess around with some germs, but I’ll be danged if I’m putting a mark on myself to PROVE it. And if you have to do the latter to do the former?
Well I guess I’ll just learn to get comfy with germs.


therightscoop--2020-12-18--House Leaders get FBI briefing on Swalwell & China SPY, CNN & MSNBC don’t MENTION his name EVEN ONCE

House minority leader Kevin McCarthy was on air today talking about the fact that a member of the intelligence committee , Eric Swalwell , has ties to a suspected Chinese spy among other red flags .
And the FBI briefed leader McCarthy along with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi on Friday afternoon .
That sure sounds like news , but not if you work at CNN or MSNBC .
Because while all that was going on , neither cable network mentioned Swalwell ’ s name one single time all day .
Not once .
NOT .
ONCE .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three different video services , including Grabien .
Zero mentions .
Y ’ all can check for yourselves .
Zip .
Here ’ s McCarthy tweeting a clip of his appearance on Fox News .
CNN spends ALL DAY watching Fox News and they still didn ’ t bring it up .
NOT EVEN THE BRIEING OF PELOSI BY THE FBI .
Trey Gowdy hit him too .
Also on Fox News .
Still NOTHING from CNN .
Nothing from MSNBC .
“ It ’ s the hardest committee in all of Congress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , noting that members of Congress and even the Intelligence Committee are not required to go through background checks and they are frequently privy to classified information .
This , he explained , was why the Speaker and the minority leader were so careful to choose the right people .
“ Kevin is 100 % right .
There are 230 members of the House .
You can ’ t find one that wasn ’ t dating a Chinese spy ?
” Gowdy asked .
“ Out of all 230 , you can ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrat side that wasn ’ t involved in a relationship , which he won ’ t even tell us what it was , Harris .
He won ’ t say whether he was sleeping with her or not .
He says it ’ s classified .
How ?
How is that classified , Eric ?
I mean you want people to not find out about it but it ’ s not classified.
” Why are you burying news that ’ s not flattering to Democrats ?
Don ’ t you care about spies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a suspected Russian spy hung out with NRA people , and they don ’ t even work for the government , much less have a seat on the HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE !
!
!
I suggest you all go ask them .
UPDATE : Oh by the way … You better believe the MSM ain ’ t even LOOKING into this .

House minority leader Kevin McCarthy was on air today talking about the fact that a member of the intelligence committee, Eric Swalwell, has ties to a suspected Chinese spy among other red flags. And the FBI briefed leader McCarthy along with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi on Friday afternoon. That sure sounds like news, but not if you work at CNN or MSNBC.
Because while all that was going on, neither cable network mentioned Swalwell’s name one single time all day. Not once. NOT. ONCE.
We checked the transcripts. We searched via three different video services, including Grabien. Zero mentions. Y’all can check for yourselves. Zip.
Here’s McCarthy tweeting a clip of his appearance on Fox News. CNN spends ALL DAY watching Fox News and they still didn’t bring it up. NOT EVEN THE BRIEING OF PELOSI BY THE FBI.
Why can't the Democrats admit that China is our adversary? Why can't they stand up to the Chinese Communist Party? pic.twitter.com/ql3HjJeVBp — Kevin McCarthy (@GOPLeader) December 18, 2020
Trey Gowdy hit him too. Also on Fox News. Still NOTHING from CNN. Nothing from MSNBC.
From the Daily Caller:
“It’s the hardest committee in all of Congress to get on,” Gowdy replied, noting that members of Congress and even the Intelligence Committee are not required to go through background checks and they are frequently privy to classified information. This, he explained, was why the Speaker and the minority leader were so careful to choose the right people.
“Kevin is 100% right. There are 230 members of the House. You can’t find one that wasn’t dating a Chinese spy?” Gowdy asked. “Out of all 230, you can’t find a single member on the Democrat side that wasn’t involved in a relationship, which he won’t even tell us what it was, Harris. He won’t say whether he was sleeping with her or not. He says it’s classified. How? How is that classified, Eric? I mean you want people to not find out about it but it’s not classified.”
Hey Brian Stelter, hey Oliver Darcy!!! Hey Jake Tapper, hey John King.! Hey Andrea Mitchell, hey Ali Velshi!!
Why are you burying news that’s not flattering to Democrats? Don’t you care about spies and espionage? You sure cared when a suspected Russian spy hung out with NRA people, and they don’t even work for the government, much less have a seat on the HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE!!!
I suggest you all go ask them.
UPDATE: Oh by the way …
A source on Capitol Hill confirmed to @FDRLST today that Rep. Eric Swalwell had a sexual relationship with communist Chinese spy Fang Fang. The FBI finally briefed congressional leaders today on the details of Fang Fang’s interactions with lawmakers on behalf of communist China. — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) December 18, 2020
You better believe the MSM ain’t even LOOKING into this.


therightscoop--2020-12-18--BREAKING: Maricopa county officials refuse to comply with subpoena of Dominion machines

Earlier this week we told you that the Arizona Senate was issuing subpoenas for the Dominion voting machines in Maricopa @ @ @ @ @ but the Maricopa Board of Supervisors is refusing to comply with the subpoena and is @ @ @ @ @ the subpoena instead : In the video , the vice chairman makes a motion to @ @ @ @ @ respond to the subpoena with a complaint in Superior Court , and that motion is @ @ @ @ @ is passed .
The Senate will be getting a letter from the county attorney , @ @ @ @ @ .
Which would seem to speak volumes about the data on those machines .
Meanwhile @ @ @ @ @ the machines themselves are getting a good scrubbing .

Earlier this week we told you that the Arizona Senate was issuing subpoenas for the Dominion voting machines in Maricopa county. That happened, but the Maricopa Board of Supervisors is refusing to comply with the subpoena and is filing a complaint to contest the subpoena instead:
JUST IN – #Arizona, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors will not comply with the subpoenas to turn over Dominion voting machines for a forensic audit. Instead, they are filing a complaint in Superior Court.pic.twitter.com/Knq4rl17Fg — Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 18, 2020
In the video, the vice chairman makes a motion to authorize the county attorney to respond to the subpoena with a complaint in Superior Court, and that motion is quickly seconded and the motion is passed.
The Senate will be getting a letter from the county attorney, but no Dominion voting machines. Which would seem to speak volumes about the data on those machines.
Meanwhile, I’m sure the machines themselves are getting a good scrubbing.


therightscoop--2020-12-18--Exodus from California may mean the state loses a House seat…

There ’ s been a rather large exodus from California and it could mean the state loses a House seat and an electoral vote : DC EXAMINER – An exodus sparked by high taxes , coronavirus lockdowns , and regulations has driven California ’ s population growth rate to a record low , which is projected to cost the state a seat in Congress and an electoral vote .
“ This is a real sea change in California , which used to be this state of pretty robust population growth , ” said Hans Johnson , a demographer at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the net migration loss , which has now occurred three years in a row .
“ It hasn ’ t been for some time now .
But it ’ s now gotten to the point where the state is essentially not growing population-wise at all.
” According to a population estimate this week , 135,600 more people fled the Golden State than moved there , which marks only the 12th time since 1900 that the state saw a net migration loss .
It is the third-largest drop recorded .
Johnson added that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lose a seat in Congress as well as an Electoral College vote for the first time .
The state did not gain any seats following the 2010 census , which was also a first .
Democrats really know how to run people out of a state with high taxes… Residents have cited high taxes as a main driver of the decision to leave .
“ I never wanted to leave California , ” San Francisco real estate broker Scott Fuller said about his departure from the state after living there since 1983 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ state with the best climate .
I think the tipping point was continued tax increases and even more proposed tax increases .
… I have absolutely no regrets.
” It ’ s not just individuals , it ’ s businesses too , especially with all of the oppressive lockdown policies by Newsom : Businesses have been fleeing California as well , and just recently , it was learned that tech giants Elon Musk and Larry Ellison were moving their companies , Tesla and Oracle , to more business-friendly states and taking tens of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have also expressed increased frustration with state and local governments over strict coronavirus lockdowns , evidenced by large protests across the state and a recall effort aimed at removing Democratic Gov .
Gavin Newsom from office that has gained enough steam to cause his team concern .
The coronavirus pandemic has also forced many in California to work from home , which makes living close to work less important and a potential move easier to commit to , especially when the same salary can be earned in a less expensive state .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out-migration quite a bit , ” Fuller said about the shift to remote employment .
“ People have options now , and you pair that with people ’ s frustration on several different levels — I don ’ t see it changing.
” While this exodus looks like a repudiation of liberal tax policies , my concern is that these Californians that are leaving will end up in red states where they will vote in radicals that will end up doing the same .
Texas is already less red than it used to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t get a handle on our school systems and universities , Texas could turn blue in the future .
I ’ d like to think that those leaving would actually switch parties , but I ’ m just not enthusiastic that will happen .

There’s been a rather large exodus from California and it could mean the state loses a House seat and an electoral vote:
DC EXAMINER – An exodus sparked by high taxes, coronavirus lockdowns, and regulations has driven California’s population growth rate to a record low, which is projected to cost the state a seat in Congress and an electoral vote. “This is a real sea change in California, which used to be this state of pretty robust population growth,” said Hans Johnson, a demographer at the Public Policy Institute of California, regarding the net migration loss, which has now occurred three years in a row. “It hasn’t been for some time now. But it’s now gotten to the point where the state is essentially not growing population-wise at all.” According to a population estimate this week, 135,600 more people fled the Golden State than moved there, which marks only the 12th time since 1900 that the state saw a net migration loss. It is the third-largest drop recorded. Johnson added that the population decrease could cause the state to lose a seat in Congress as well as an Electoral College vote for the first time. The state did not gain any seats following the 2010 census, which was also a first.
Democrats really know how to run people out of a state with high taxes…
Residents have cited high taxes as a main driver of the decision to leave. “I never wanted to leave California,” San Francisco real estate broker Scott Fuller said about his departure from the state after living there since 1983. “It’s the most beautiful state with the best climate. I think the tipping point was continued tax increases and even more proposed tax increases. … I have absolutely no regrets.”
It’s not just individuals, it’s businesses too, especially with all of the oppressive lockdown policies by Newsom:
Businesses have been fleeing California as well, and just recently, it was learned that tech giants Elon Musk and Larry Ellison were moving their companies, Tesla and Oracle, to more business-friendly states and taking tens of thousands of jobs with them. Californians have also expressed increased frustration with state and local governments over strict coronavirus lockdowns, evidenced by large protests across the state and a recall effort aimed at removing Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom from office that has gained enough steam to cause his team concern. The coronavirus pandemic has also forced many in California to work from home, which makes living close to work less important and a potential move easier to commit to, especially when the same salary can be earned in a less expensive state. “It’s really sped up the out-migration quite a bit,” Fuller said about the shift to remote employment. “People have options now, and you pair that with people’s frustration on several different levels — I don’t see it changing.”
While this exodus looks like a repudiation of liberal tax policies, my concern is that these Californians that are leaving will end up in red states where they will vote in radicals that will end up doing the same. Texas is already less red than it used to be, and if we don’t get a handle on our school systems and universities, Texas could turn blue in the future. I’d like to think that those leaving would actually switch parties, but I’m just not enthusiastic that will happen.


therightscoop--2020-12-18--BREAKING: Hawley motion to vote on bill for $1200 checks FAILS after Republican objects and here’s w

BREAKING: Hawley motion to vote on bill for $1200 checks FAILS after Republican objects and here’s what Hawley says will happen next…

Yesterday we told you that Senator Josh Hawley would bring his $ 1200 covid relief check proposal on the Senate floor and ask for a vote .
That has now happened and according to reports , it was a Republican who objected and thus blocked it : “ Hawley ( R-MO ) from Senate floor asked unanimous consent for Senate to pass his bill for $ 1,200 for individuals , $ 2,400 for couples , $ 500 for kids in direct COVID-19 relief payments .
Johnson ( R-WI ) objected to his bill & overall COVID-19 relief package proposal : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” According to CNN reporter Manu Raju , Hawley was frustrated as he left the floor and said he will block the current coronavirus relief package until he knows exactly what is in the bill : Hawley also reportedly said if direct assistance isn ’ t in the bill , he won ’ t allow it to pass : This is important because the Senate hopes to speed this through , which I ’ m guessing is through unanimous consent , and they can ’ t do that if Hawley isn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hawley ’ s floor speech after Johnson objected :

Yesterday we told you that Senator Josh Hawley would bring his $1200 covid relief check proposal on the Senate floor and ask for a vote. That has now happened and according to reports, it was a Republican who objected and thus blocked it:
“Hawley (R-MO) from Senate floor asked unanimous consent for Senate to pass his bill for $1,200 for individuals, $2,400 for couples,$500 for kids in direct COVID-19 relief payments.
Johnson (R-WI) objected to his bill & overall COVID-19 relief package proposal: “It is way too big.””
Hawley (R-MO) from Senate floor asked unanimous consent for Senate to pass his bill for $1,200 for individuals, $2,400 for couples,$500 for kids in direct COVID-19 relief payments. Johnson (R-WI) objected to his bill & overall COVID-19 relief package proposal:"It is way too big." pic.twitter.com/BYv8SeNzAX — Craig Caplan (@CraigCaplan) December 18, 2020
Hawley:"This is not the end of this fight.I'm here right now on this floor.Sen Sanders will be back in a matter of hrs to ask again for the same measure..I will keep working with whomever it takes, for however long it takes until we get the working people of this country relief." — Craig Caplan (@CraigCaplan) December 18, 2020
According to CNN reporter Manu Raju, Hawley was frustrated as he left the floor and said he will block the current coronavirus relief package until he knows exactly what is in the bill:
Sen. Josh Hawley came off the Senate floor and was frustrated at the lack of information about the covid relief talks and said he would object to any efforts to pass a short-term continuing resolution until he gets details of what’s in the bill and assurances of what’s in there. — Manu Raju (@mkraju) December 18, 2020
“Yeah, I think this is reaching a point of it's beginning to reach the point of absurdity…. I’m not prepared to sign off on a CR until I know what’s going on,” Hawley told us — Manu Raju (@mkraju) December 18, 2020
Hawley also reportedly said if direct assistance isn’t in the bill, he won’t allow it to pass:
Hawley to pooler @mkraju: I want to see some indication that there is actually a package that is ready to be voted on and I want assurances that direct assistance is in this package and if it is not, I will not agree to a CR. — Jennifer Shutt (@JenniferShutt) December 18, 2020
This is important because the Senate hopes to speed this through, which I’m guessing is through unanimous consent, and they can’t do that if Hawley isn’t on board.
UPDATE: Below is Hawley’s floor speech after Johnson objected:
Sen. @HawleyMO responds to @SenRonJohnson objecting to his unanimous consent for $1,200 stimulus checks: "Working people are told they may be last… I just urge members of these bodies, go home and try explaining that to the people of your state."pic.twitter.com/ZVy7NZs16z — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) December 18, 2020


therightscoop--2020-12-18--Supreme Court throws out state challenge to Trump’s census plan to exclude illegals

The Supreme Court dismissed a challenge by the states to Trump ’ s census plan to exclude illegals from the census counts : NBC NEWS – The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a challenge to President Donald Trump ’ s plan to leave undocumented immigrants out of the final census count , giving the president a partial victory , though possibly a temporary one .
By a 6-3 vote , the court said too much is unknown about whether the administration can even carry out the plan and about what effect it would have on the states .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speculation , ” the court said in a short , unsigned opinion , referring to the states ’ challenge to Trump ’ s plan .
“ The policy may not prove feasible to implement in any manner whatsoever.
” The census , required by the Constitution and conducted every 10 years , is used to determine how many members of Congress each state gets in the House of Representatives .
The data is also used to calculate a local government ’ s share of $ 1.5 trillion in funds under many federal programs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ president could now try to carry out his plan , but the states would undoubtedly come right back and challenge it .
In July , Trump issued a memo that said people who are undocumented should not be included in the final count .
Under his plan , the Census Bureau would report two sets of figures to the White House : one including everyone counted and another allowing him to leave out undocumented immigrants .
The president could then report the smaller number to Congress for use in reapportionment .
A group @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to block the plan , saying it would shift money and political power away from states with large immigrant populations and would violate the Constitution and federal law .
Justices Stephen Breyer , Sonia Sotomayor , and Elena Kagan said enough is known about the plan to render it unconstitutional .
The court ’ s majority opinion said it was expressing no view on whether the policy would be unconstitutional .

The Supreme Court dismissed a challenge by the states to Trump’s census plan to exclude illegals from the census counts:
NBC NEWS – The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a challenge to President Donald Trump’s plan to leave undocumented immigrants out of the final census count, giving the president a partial victory, though possibly a temporary one.
By a 6-3 vote, the court said too much is unknown about whether the administration can even carry out the plan and about what effect it would have on the states.
“This case is riddled with contingencies and speculation,” the court said in a short, unsigned opinion, referring to the states’ challenge to Trump’s plan. “The policy may not prove feasible to implement in any manner whatsoever.”
The census, required by the Constitution and conducted every 10 years, is used to determine how many members of Congress each state gets in the House of Representatives. The data is also used to calculate a local government’s share of $1.5 trillion in funds under many federal programs.
As a legal matter, the president could now try to carry out his plan, but the states would undoubtedly come right back and challenge it.
In July, Trump issued a memo that said people who are undocumented should not be included in the final count. Under his plan, the Census Bureau would report two sets of figures to the White House: one including everyone counted and another allowing him to leave out undocumented immigrants. The president could then report the smaller number to Congress for use in reapportionment.
A group of states led by New York sued to block the plan, saying it would shift money and political power away from states with large immigrant populations and would violate the Constitution and federal law. Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan said enough is known about the plan to render it unconstitutional.
The court’s majority opinion said it was expressing no view on whether the policy would be unconstitutional.


therightscoop--2020-12-18--Pentagon HALTS Biden transition briefings – [UPDATED]

The acting replacement for former SecDef Mark Esper has just halted defense briefings with Team Biden : AXIOS – Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller ordered a Pentagon-wide halt to cooperation with the transition of President-elect Biden , shocking officials across the Defense Department , senior administration officials tell Axios .
Meetings between President Trump ’ s team and the Biden team are going on throughout the government , after a delayed start as the administration dragged its feet on officially recognizing Biden as president-elect .
Then on Thursday night , Miller — who was appointed Nov. 9 , when Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the election — ordered officials throughout the building to cancel scheduled transition meetings .
The Pentagon official said that officials were just too overwhelmed with the number of meetings : A senior Defense Department official sought to downplay the move , calling it “ a simple delay of the last few scheduled meetings until after the new year.
” “ We had fewer than two dozen remaining meetings on the schedule today and next week , ” the official said , adding that “ the DoD staff working the meetings were overwhelmed by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same senior leaders needed to do their day jobs and were being consumed by transition activities .
… With the holidays we are taking a knee for two weeks .
We are still committed to a productive transition.
” So it sounds like it ’ s just a delay so that people can get their jobs done and start back with briefings at the beginning of the year .
It sounds like nothing really to see here , but I ’ m sure the media will make hay out of the Trump administration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ team or something .
UPDATE : Former DNI Richard Grenell says this report isn ’ t true , that there have already been more pentagon briefings than there were in 2016 .
He calls this story by Axios ‘ clickbait ’ :

The acting replacement for former SecDef Mark Esper has just halted defense briefings with Team Biden:
AXIOS – Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller ordered a Pentagon-wide halt to cooperation with the transition of President-elect Biden, shocking officials across the Defense Department, senior administration officials tell Axios. Meetings between President Trump’s team and the Biden team are going on throughout the government, after a delayed start as the administration dragged its feet on officially recognizing Biden as president-elect. Then on Thursday night, Miller — who was appointed Nov. 9, when Trump fired Defense Secretary Mark Esper right after the election — ordered officials throughout the building to cancel scheduled transition meetings.
The Pentagon official said that officials were just too overwhelmed with the number of meetings:
A senior Defense Department official sought to downplay the move, calling it “a simple delay of the last few scheduled meetings until after the new year.” “We had fewer than two dozen remaining meetings on the schedule today and next week,” the official said, adding that “the DoD staff working the meetings were overwhelmed by the number of meetings.” “These same senior leaders needed to do their day jobs and were being consumed by transition activities. … With the holidays we are taking a knee for two weeks. We are still committed to a productive transition.”
So it sounds like it’s just a delay so that people can get their jobs done and start back with briefings at the beginning of the year. It sounds like nothing really to see here, but I’m sure the media will make hay out of the Trump administration refusing to brief Biden’s transition team or something.
UPDATE: Former DNI Richard Grenell says this report isn’t true, that there have already been more pentagon briefings than there were in 2016. He calls this story by Axios ‘clickbait’:
This isn’t true. The current Pentagon team has given more transition meetings than were given in 2016. These anonymous sources have political agendas and it’s definitely not about sharing facts. This is click bait reporting. https://t.co/ghmZNM1YxE — Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) December 18, 2020


therightscoop--2020-12-18--“Get Joe involved” – New texts reveal how Biden Crime Family needed Joe’s help with Chinese business

“Get Joe involved” – New texts reveal how Biden Crime Family needed Joe’s help with Chinese business dealings

New emails have emerged that show the Biden crime family in 2017 asking for Joe to attend a meeting with Chinese business men for their business venture : FOX NEWS – Hunter Biden ’ s former business associates were hinting at a push to “ get Joe involved ” in a joint venture with Chinese Energy Company CEFC and make the venture appear as a “ truly family business ” to the Chinese , according to text messages obtained and reviewed by Fox News .
In text messages dating back to 2017 , Hunter ’ s now-ex-associates James Gilliar and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ joint venture with CEFC , the “ stakes ” and appeared to hint at discussions about getting the now-president-elect involved .
In a back-and-forth over the terms of the company , Gilliar , in a May 11 , 2017 text message to Bobulinski , wrote : “ Man U are right let ’ s get the company set up , then tell H and family the high stakes and get Joe involved.
” Days earlier , in a conversation regarding a meeting which included what appeared to be high-level CEFC executives including the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2017— Gilliar asked Bobulinski to come up with an “ a lister to meet chairman Sunday.
” “ Top person at same level as chairman , who would like to access China or money , ” Gilliar replied .
“ It ’ s the way it works culturally for them.
” Gilliar added : “ And empowers the B family so therefore us.
” The following day , Gilliar texted Bobulinski : “ Think Joe may come Sunday .
I ’ m hoping.
” “ Yah I told Jim [ Biden ] that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can make it he should be there , ” Bobulinski replied on May 5 , 2017 .
A source familiar told Fox News that Joe Biden did not attend the May 7 , 2017 meeting .
The text messages came during what appeared to be a critical time in the organization of the joint-venture — between Hunter and Jim Biden and their associates , Gilliar , Bobulinski and Rob Walker .
The venture , called Sinohawk Holdings , was meant to be a partnership with Chinese energy firm CEFC .
The venture never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CEFC funds to Sinohawk Holdings never took place .
The fact that Joe didn ’ t attend the meeting isn ’ t proof he wasn ’ t involved .
In fact we already know he met with Bobulinski about the Chinese business dealings .
Not to mention the first NY Post blockbuster was how Hunter arranged a meeting with a Ukrainian business partner and his father back in 2015 .
He was absolutely involved , which is why they thought they could get Joe to come to this meeting .

New emails have emerged that show the Biden crime family in 2017 asking for Joe to attend a meeting with Chinese business men for their business venture:
FOX NEWS – Hunter Biden’s former business associates were hinting at a push to “get Joe involved” in a joint venture with Chinese Energy Company CEFC and make the venture appear as a “truly family business” to the Chinese, according to text messages obtained and reviewed by Fox News. In text messages dating back to 2017, Hunter’s now-ex-associates James Gilliar and Tony Bobulinski discussed a breakdown of the joint venture with CEFC, the “stakes” and appeared to hint at discussions about getting the now-president-elect involved. In a back-and-forth over the terms of the company, Gilliar, in a May 11, 2017 text message to Bobulinski, wrote: “Man U are right let’s get the company set up, then tell H and family the high stakes and get Joe involved.”
“Think Joe may come Sunday. I’m hoping.”
Days earlier, in a conversation regarding a meeting which included what appeared to be high-level CEFC executives including the chairman—slated for Sunday, May 7, 2017— Gilliar asked Bobulinski to come up with an “a lister to meet chairman Sunday.” “Ok. A ‘lister’?” Bobulinski replied on May 4, 2017. “Top person at same level as chairman, who would like to access China or money,” Gilliar replied. “It’s the way it works culturally for them.” Gilliar added: “And empowers the B family so therefore us.” The following day, Gilliar texted Bobulinski: “Think Joe may come Sunday. I’m hoping.” “Yah I told Jim [Biden] that’s a no brainer if he can make it he should be there,” Bobulinski replied on May 5, 2017. Gilliar replied: “Agreed.” A source familiar told Fox News that Joe Biden did not attend the May 7, 2017 meeting. The text messages came during what appeared to be a critical time in the organization of the joint-venture — between Hunter and Jim Biden and their associates, Gilliar, Bobulinski and Rob Walker. The venture, called Sinohawk Holdings, was meant to be a partnership with Chinese energy firm CEFC. The venture never came to fruition and the transfer of CEFC funds to Sinohawk Holdings never took place.
The fact that Joe didn’t attend the meeting isn’t proof he wasn’t involved. In fact we already know he met with Bobulinski about the Chinese business dealings. Not to mention the first NY Post blockbuster was how Hunter arranged a meeting with a Ukrainian business partner and his father back in 2015. He was absolutely involved, which is why they thought they could get Joe to come to this meeting.


therightscoop--2020-12-20--A MUST-WATCH as Peter Navarro details coordinated Democratic CESSPOOL of fraud, bribery, & ABUSE in

A MUST-WATCH as Peter Navarro details coordinated Democratic CESSPOOL of fraud, bribery, & ABUSE in 2020 vote

Peter Navarro ’ s groundbreaking report on the 2020 election was referenced by Trump on Twitter in the wee hours of Saturday morning .
And on Saturday evening , Navarro appeared on Fox News to break it all down , with the help of Jesse Watters , in a stunning and yet easy to understand way .
( Video below . )
“ You get to the bottom of this granularity and it jumps out at you : Coordinated Democrat strategy .
Stuff the ballot box with often dubious , illegal , mail-in and absentee ballots , ” said Navarro @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it differently.
” In the interview , Navarro goes through a crazy list ways Democrats interfered with the vote , including instances of outright bribery , buying of votes , unverified voters… “ It ’ s a cesspool , ” said Navarro .
But there ’ s really no reason for me to break it down again .
Watch this .
It ’ s fantastic .
“ This is about a lot more than fraud , per se , ” says Navarro , explaining there are so many pieces including pushing the envelope @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legislatures to violate a state ’ s own laws .
What really gets me is the change in the “ tide.
” It took a huge patchwork of a thousand different INTENTIONAL ways the Democrats worked together ( and with cover from the media , by the way ) to make sure that THEY determined the outcome , not the voters .

Peter Navarro’s groundbreaking report on the 2020 election was referenced by Trump on Twitter in the wee hours of Saturday morning. And on Saturday evening, Navarro appeared on Fox News to break it all down, with the help of Jesse Watters, in a stunning and yet easy to understand way. (Video below.)
“You get to the bottom of this granularity and it jumps out at you: Coordinated Democrat strategy. Stuff the ballot box with often dubious, illegal, mail-in and absentee ballots,” said Navarro. “Every state kind of stole it differently.”
In the interview, Navarro goes through a crazy list ways Democrats interfered with the vote, including instances of outright bribery, buying of votes, unverified voters… “It’s a cesspool,” said Navarro.
But there’s really no reason for me to break it down again. Watch this. It’s fantastic.
“This is about a lot more than fraud, per se,” says Navarro, explaining there are so many pieces including pushing the envelope within the law, or using state legislatures to violate a state’s own laws.
What really gets me is the change in the “tide.”
It took a huge patchwork of a thousand different INTENTIONAL ways the Democrats worked together (and with cover from the media, by the way) to make sure that THEY determined the outcome, not the voters.
Stunning.


therightscoop--2020-12-20--Dude Eric Bolling goes *OFF* on BENEDICT ARNOLD Republican elites: Trump may be LAST Republican pres

Dude Eric Bolling goes *OFF* on BENEDICT ARNOLD Republican elites: Trump may be LAST Republican president EVER

Eric Bolling has HAD it with Establishment Elite Republicans .
And Friday night was , in his own words , no exception .
In fact , it was dang epic .
A must-watch .
“ Donald Trump will be the last Republican President in my lifetime , ” said Bolling .
“ Let me say that again .
Donald Trump will be the last Republican President in my lifetime .
He may be the last GOP president ever again.
” Bolling said that McConnell threw in the towel on the election , declaring Biden the winner despite all the challenges @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Newsmax , too , for their calling Biden “ president-elect.
” “ The Republican Party is in disarray , ” he said .
“ They are split between the pro-Trump wing of the party and the establishment , old-school wing .
Meanwhile , the left is united , laughing all the way to the White House.
” He then ran down an epic list of accomplishments that no other GOP president could match , including three conservative justices .
“ Turncoat republicans like Mitt Romney , Anthony Scaramucci , Mr. Kellyanne Conway , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will never be another Republican president .
These Benedict Arnolds are ignoring the fact that 74 million people voted for Trump .
He is a very popular president.
” Now that is how you deliver a monologue .

Eric Bolling has HAD it with Establishment Elite Republicans. And Friday night was, in his own words, no exception. In fact, it was dang epic. A must-watch.
“Donald Trump will be the last Republican President in my lifetime,” said Bolling. “Let me say that again. Donald Trump will be the last Republican President in my lifetime. He may be the last GOP president ever again.”
Bolling said that McConnell threw in the towel on the election, declaring Biden the winner despite all the challenges raised by the President, and hit Newsmax, too, for their calling Biden “president-elect.”
“The Republican Party is in disarray,” he said. “They are split between the pro-Trump wing of the party and the establishment, old-school wing. Meanwhile, the left is united, laughing all the way to the White House.”
He then ran down an epic list of accomplishments that no other GOP president could match, including three conservative justices.
“Turncoat republicans like Mitt Romney, Anthony Scaramucci, Mr. Kellyanne Conway, and many more are the reason there will never be another Republican president. These Benedict Arnolds are ignoring the fact that 74 million people voted for Trump. He is a very popular president.”
Now that is how you deliver a monologue.


therightscoop--2020-12-19--YES! More please! New York restaurant owners BAND together to BAN Cuomo PERMANENTLY, get BIG support

YES! More please! New York restaurant owners BAND together to BAN Cuomo PERMANENTLY, get BIG support online

Restaurant owners in New York have been getting destroyed and shut down by the actions of Gov .
Andrew Cuomo , as Scoop readers well know .
Well now some of them ( and hopefully soon MORE of them ) have got themselves one seriously smart pushback plan : shut HIM down .
Or to say it more distinctly : ban him .
From eating there .
Permanently .
Struggling restaurant owners city-wide are permanently banning New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo from setting foot into their establishments .
According to bar owner Larry Baird “ He can eat at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but he will not be served anywhere in New York City , known universally as the world ’ s greatest dining destination !
If he has to use the restroom he can go pee on my street-corner !
That ’ s what he wants anyway !
” This is surely the best idea ever .
And it started with the Facebook group “ NYC Restaurants Open ” .
“ He can dine at Gracie Mansion if he wants hospitality in Manhattan , ” one member wrote .
“ He ain ’ t getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a smash hit online , and Fox ’ s Janice Dean – who has every reason for her anger and resentment of Cuomo – is HERE FOR IT .
Twitchy found a lot more support , including from one user who put it just about perfect .
But let ’ s not forget in our enjoyment of this just lack of desserts , that restaurants are actually in seriously dire circumstances under the lockdown cruelty of Democrat regimes .
It ’ s bad .
Cuomo seriously has EARNED being shut out .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my joint if it were me .

Restaurant owners in New York have been getting destroyed and shut down by the actions of Gov. Andrew Cuomo, as Scoop readers well know. Well now some of them (and hopefully soon MORE of them) have got themselves one seriously smart pushback plan: shut HIM down.
Or to say it more distinctly: ban him. From eating there. Permanently.
From The Coney Island Blog:
Struggling restaurant owners city-wide are permanently banning New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo from setting foot into their establishments. Effective immediately. According to bar owner Larry Baird “ He can eat at some shitty roadside diner outside of Albany but he will not be served anywhere in New York City, known universally as the world’s greatest dining destination! If he has to use the restroom he can go pee on my street-corner! That’s what he wants anyway!”
This is surely the best idea ever. And it started with the Facebook group “NYC Restaurants Open”.
“He can dine at Gracie Mansion if he wants hospitality in Manhattan,” one member wrote. “He ain’t getting it here!”
The idea is a smash hit online, and Fox’s Janice Dean – who has every reason for her anger and resentment of Cuomo – is HERE FOR IT.
This made me laugh. NYC Restaurants to Ban @NYGovCuomo from Dining https://t.co/OCRtqtciYv — Janice Dean (@JaniceDean) December 19, 2020
There’s a few other governors that should get the same “service” — Janice Dean (@JaniceDean) December 19, 2020
Twitchy found a lot more support, including from one user who put it just about perfect.
This is perfect! If he can ban them, they can ban him!! https://t.co/U9M4wCSaqn — Sunnybeach (@Sunnybeach95) December 19, 2020
That’s EXACTLY right.
But let’s not forget in our enjoyment of this just lack of desserts, that restaurants are actually in seriously dire circumstances under the lockdown cruelty of Democrat regimes.
It’s bad. Cuomo seriously has EARNED being shut out. I sure wouldn’t let him in my joint if it were me.


therightscoop--2020-12-19--LET’S GET WILD! President Trump advertises BIG protest in D.C. on January 6th: ‘BE THERE’

On January 6th , Congress holds a joint session during which they count the electoral college votes for President of the United States .
It ’ s the last stop on the electoral train before inauguration on January 20th .
Sen. Mitch McConnell has urged Republicans not to object or interfere on January 6th , but instead to count and “ affirm ” the electoral win for Joe Biden .
President Trump , however , has a MUCH better plan : get wild .
He ’ s right you know .
I mean , even if everything changes and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it ’ s still going to be WILD in D.C.
There ’ s no way it can turn out any other way .
There will be protests .
Probably fights if we ’ re bein honest .
Drama on the cable news networks that until now have hung their hearts on the words “ mostly peaceful.
” But there will also be a lot of fun .
The fact is , from now until inauguration day , the two opposing political sides are going to be raucous , angry at times , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up .
That ’ s just how it is .
And now that the President is inviting everyone into town for the party , well there ’ s only one possible word for what it ’ s going to be like .
WILD .

On January 6th, Congress holds a joint session during which they count the electoral college votes for President of the United States. It’s the last stop on the electoral train before inauguration on January 20th.
Sen. Mitch McConnell has urged Republicans not to object or interfere on January 6th, but instead to count and “affirm” the electoral win for Joe Biden. President Trump, however, has a MUCH better plan: get wild.
Peter Navarro releases 36-page report alleging election fraud 'more than sufficient' to swing victory to Trump https://t.co/D8KrMHnFdK. A great report by Peter. Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election. Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 19, 2020
He’s right you know. I mean, even if everything changes and the count that day is for President Trump, it’s still going to be WILD in D.C. There’s no way it can turn out any other way.
There will be protests. Probably fights if we’re bein honest. Drama on the cable news networks that until now have hung their hearts on the words “mostly peaceful.” But there will also be a lot of fun.
The fact is, from now until inauguration day, the two opposing political sides are going to be raucous, angry at times, smug at others, but always worked up. That’s just how it is.
And now that the President is inviting everyone into town for the party, well there’s only one possible word for what it’s going to be like. WILD.


therightscoop--2020-12-19--BIG: Trump WH meeting with Powell, Rudy, Flynn. Talked SPECIAL COUNSEL and DEPLOYING MILITARY

On Friday , President Trump had a very important meeting at the White House .
Sidney Powell was there , and so was Michael Flynn .
Rudy Giuliani was on by phone .
By mainstream media accounts it was “ raucous.
” But it ’ s the subject matter that matters .
It ’ s being shared across the spectrum , from Gateway Pundit to the New York Times and everywhere in between , with a lot of different reactions from trying to mock and belittle it to acting like its a precursor to Armageddon .
But what SHOULD be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is to fighting this thing thoroughly .
The details came out first from NYT ’ s Trump-hating Maggie Haberman , and later confirmed by Trump-hating Daily Beast , both using unnamed sources .
But I reckon it rings pretty true , if you take out the editorializing .
The key takeaways are that the president suggested appointing Powell as a Special Counsel to investigate voter fraud and election tampering in this country , which seems like a pretty dang good thing to look into with a special counsel probe , if you ask @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says that the idea was rejected by Rudy Giuliani himself .
There was this , too : Flynn has already brought this up elsewhere .

On Friday, President Trump had a very important meeting at the White House. Sidney Powell was there, and so was Michael Flynn. Rudy Giuliani was on by phone. By mainstream media accounts it was “raucous.” But it’s the subject matter that matters.
It’s being shared across the spectrum, from Gateway Pundit to the New York Times and everywhere in between, with a lot of different reactions from trying to mock and belittle it to acting like its a precursor to Armageddon.
But what SHOULD be the biggest takeaway is how committed Trump is to fighting this thing thoroughly. The details came out first from NYT’s Trump-hating Maggie Haberman, and later confirmed by Trump-hating Daily Beast, both using unnamed sources. But I reckon it rings pretty true, if you take out the editorializing.
The key takeaways are that the president suggested appointing Powell as a Special Counsel to investigate voter fraud and election tampering in this country, which seems like a pretty dang good thing to look into with a special counsel probe, if you ask me.
Still, the mainstream media says that the idea was rejected by Rudy Giuliani himself.
There was this, too:
Confirming @maggieNYT @KannoYoungs: Trump discussed naming Sidney Powell special counsel on election fraud. Meadows, Cipollone pushed back. Deploying the military was raised in the meeting but nixed. Giuliani pushed DHS to get involved but was told they don’t have the authority. https://t.co/4XwAnl0x1F — Rebecca Ballhaus (@rebeccaballhaus) December 19, 2020
Flynn has already brought this up elsewhere.


therightscoop--2020-12-19--WATCH: Rep. Kevin McCarthy says FBI briefing FUNDAMENTALLY proved Swalwell should NOT be on Intel Co

WATCH: Rep. Kevin McCarthy says FBI briefing FUNDAMENTALLY proved Swalwell should NOT be on Intel Committee

The FBI briefing that CNN and MSNBC didn ’ t even mention ahead of time on Friday “ fundamentally answered @ @ @ @ @ House minority leader Kevin McCarthy : Eric Swalwell “ should not be on the intel @ @ @ @ @ House leaders , including Speaker Nancy Pelosi , was about Swalwell ’ s involvement with @ @ @ @ @ spy for China .
It ’ s telling that Pelosi didn ’ t claim the @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s pretty clear from this briefing that the scheme perpetrated by China was @ @ @ @ @ s relationship to it should NOT be on the INTEL committee , of all things @ @ @ @ @ this all the way through .

The FBI briefing that CNN and MSNBC didn’t even mention ahead of time on Friday “fundamentally answered” one thing, said House minority leader Kevin McCarthy: Eric Swalwell “should not be on the intel committee.”
The briefing of House leaders, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi, was about Swalwell’s involvement with and attachments to a suspected spy for China. It’s telling that Pelosi didn’t claim the meeting absolved him.
But it’s pretty clear from this briefing that the scheme perpetrated by China was MAJOR and that Swalwell’s relationship to it should NOT be on the INTEL committee, of all things.
You really should watch this all the way through.
This is important.


therightscoop--2020-12-19--‘FIGHT FOR TRUMP!’ trends on social as President tries to WAKE up GOP: ‘Don’t be weak fools!’

This morning , evil Twitter is probably very unhappy , because the President and his supporters are dominating .
The phrase “ fight for Trump ” is a trending topic , the “ Fight for Trump ” video is rocketing across the web , and the President ’ s gut check to to the GOP is taking over headlines .
So what started the trend ?
THIS : The President also tweeted at Republicans to get their heads out of their behinds .
He said Biden “ didn ’ t win ” and “ lost all 6 swing states by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ GOP needs to get some guts .
“ Don ’ t be weak fools !
” That ’ s good advice any time , y ’ all .
Don ’ t ever be weak in the face of mere social pressure , in the face of peer pressure or stigma .
Stand up for the thing you think is right and is true .
Fight for it .
Here ’ s more from the Fight for Trump trending topic .
I think libs really think if they just ignore all this it will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t seem too likely , does it ?

This morning, evil Twitter is probably very unhappy, because the President and his supporters are dominating. The phrase “fight for Trump” is a trending topic, the “Fight for Trump” video is rocketing across the web, and the President’s gut check to to the GOP is taking over headlines.
Bad day to be a whiny lib.
So what started the trend? THIS:
The President also tweeted at Republicans to get their heads out of their behinds. He said Biden “didn’t win” and “lost all 6 swing states by a lot,” and that the GOP needs to get some guts. “Don’t be weak fools!”
He didn’t win the Election. He lost all 6 Swing States, by a lot. They then dumped hundreds of thousands of votes in each one, and got caught. Now Republican politicians have to fight so that their great victory is not stolen. Don’t be weak fools! https://t.co/d9Bgu8XPIj — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 19, 2020
That’s good advice any time, y’all. Don’t ever be weak in the face of mere social pressure, in the face of peer pressure or stigma. Stand up for the thing you think is right and is true. Fight for it.
Here’s more from the Fight for Trump trending topic.
A clear and simple message to Republican politicians who desire a political career beyond 2020: FIGHT FOR TRUMP! — Daniel Hill (@danhill2011) December 19, 2020
Senator Daines, I just saw you on Fox News, thank you for not letting that loser who interviewed you subvert you, and thanks for fighting for our vote. We support you! See you January 6th! Fight for Trump! 🇺🇸 — Lauren Witzke (@LaurenWitzkeDE) December 19, 2020
Gm fight for trump! — Jon Miller (@MillerStream) December 19, 2020
This one literally brought tears to my eyes. And reaffirms the fight and conviction in my heart. I KNOW I am on the right side of history. As goes America, so goes the world. I’ll fight for Trump. To the end. Will you? — Evil Beagle 🇵🇭🇺🇸🇸🇪 (@Evil_Beagle) December 19, 2020
I’ve already said a thousand times and I’ll say again: My org, #WalkAway will do BETTER if Biden is elected. Trump being president does NOT HELP #WalkAway. I fight for Trump because this election was stolen & it’s wrong. But a Biden win only helps my org- if… — Brandon Straka (@BrandonStraka) December 14, 2020
Honestly, I'm tired of HOLDING the line. I'm ready to STORM the line. Whose with me? We need to FIGHT for Trump!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 — David Fischer (@Gods_Warrior91) December 19, 2020
FIGHT FOR TRUMP! 🇺🇸 — Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) December 18, 2020
I think libs really think if they just ignore all this it will eventually go away. But that doesn’t seem too likely, does it?