therightscoop--2020-11-23--SICKENING: Cuomo accepts international emmy award for handling of COVID-19 pandemic

This is just sickening : FOX NEWS – New York Gov .
Andrew Cuomo received the Founders Award “ in recognition of his leadership during the Covid-19 pandemic and his masterful use of television to inform and calm people around the world ” at Monday ’ s International Emmy Awards ceremony .
The ceremony was broadcast virtually on Monday morning .
Cuomo held a coronavirus media briefing on Monday morning as well .
According to the Emmys , its Founder ’ s Award is given to those who “ cross cultural boundaries to touch our common humanity.
” Past recipients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Oprah Winfrey , and Steven Spielberg .
This always happens to Democrats .
Remember how Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for literally doing nothing ?
Now the man whose irresponsible coronavirus policy led to the deaths of thousands of elderly patients is getting an emmy ?
What the hell .
If anyone deserves an emmy it ’ s President Trump .
Not only did he solve the ventilator and PPE shortage using the private sector , he did the same to get testing up and running all over the country .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3 vaccines that are showing over 90 % effectiveness all because of the work the Trump administration did to make all of this happen .
But does he get credit for this ?
Of course not , because the media and the people who run these phony award organizations hate him .
Yet they ’ ll bend over to give the elderly killer an emmy , which tells you all you need to know about them .

This is just sickening:
FOX NEWS – New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo received the Founders Award “in recognition of his leadership during the Covid-19 pandemic and his masterful use of television to inform and calm people around the world” at Monday’s International Emmy Awards ceremony. The ceremony was broadcast virtually on Monday morning. Cuomo held a coronavirus media briefing on Monday morning as well. According to the Emmys, its Founder’s Award is given to those who “cross cultural boundaries to touch our common humanity.” Past recipients include former Vice President Al Gore, Oprah Winfrey, and Steven Spielberg.
This always happens to Democrats. Remember how Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for literally doing nothing? Now the man whose irresponsible coronavirus policy led to the deaths of thousands of elderly patients is getting an emmy? What the hell.
If anyone deserves an emmy it’s President Trump. Not only did he solve the ventilator and PPE shortage using the private sector, he did the same to get testing up and running all over the country. But even more incredibly, we now have 3 vaccines that are showing over 90% effectiveness all because of the work the Trump administration did to make all of this happen.
Operation Warp Speed is quite literally the greatest public health achievement of modern times. The fastest development and distribution of a vaccine for a novel virus in history. Say what you will about Trump’s handling of the pandemic, he deserves credit for this. — Marc Thiessen (@marcthiessen) November 19, 2020
But does he get credit for this? Of course not, because the media and the people who run these phony award organizations hate him. Yet they’ll bend over to give the elderly killer an emmy, which tells you all you need to know about them.


therightscoop--2020-11-23--BREAKING: Team Trump’s appeal of Pennsylvania case granted expedited review

The Trump campaign ’ s appeal of a case that was dismissed by a judge on Saturday has just been @ @ @ @ @ 3rd Circuit : Appellants ’ amended motion for emergency expedited review is granted at the @ @ @ @ @ Appellants ’ brief must be filed on or before 4:00 p.m. today .
Appellees ’ @ @ @ @ @ or before 4:00 p.m. on November 24 , 2020 .
The court will advise if @ @ @ @ @ This is the appeal that Trump had said yesterday would happen and it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ to certify results today .

The Trump campaign’s appeal of a case that was dismissed by a judge on Saturday has just been granted expedited review by the 3rd Circuit:
🚨NEW: Third Circuit Court of Appeals grants expedited review for Team Trump’s appeal from Pennsylvania. pic.twitter.com/LKJDnPGRSn — Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) November 23, 2020
The order says:
Appellants’ amended motion for emergency expedited review is granted at the direction of the Court. Appellants’ brief must be filed on or before 4:00 p.m. today. Appellees’ briefs must be filed on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 24, 2020. The court will advise if oral argument is desired.
This is the appeal that Trump had said yesterday would happen and it’s important because Pennsylvania is set to certify results today.
….WILL APPEAL! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 22, 2020
Stay tuned…


therightscoop--2020-11-23--Own an AR-15? Biden wants to charge you $200 to keep it

Biden is considering a plan that would cost you $ 200 to keep your AR-15 that you already own , @ @ @ @ @ it to the government : FREE BEACON – Biden wants to ban new sales of @ @ @ @ @ as well as any ammunition magazine holding more than 10 rounds—sizes that come standard on @ @ @ @ @ .
He would pay some owners to surrender the affected guns they legally own and @ @ @ @ @ the guns under the National Firearms Act .
The proposal would require owners to pay @ @ @ @ @ for each item .
Not only would he charge you to keep your AR-15 , @ @ @ @ @ become part of a new gun registry .
This is another reason why we have @ @ @ @ @ seats in Georgia on January 5th and keep fighting the RINOs in our party , @ @ @ @ @ able to do this stuff legislatively .
The next four years are going to be @ @ @ @ @ Trump doesn ’ t win soon…

Biden is considering a plan that would cost you $200 to keep your AR-15 that you already own, unless you want to sell it to the government:
FREE BEACON – Biden wants to ban new sales of AR-15 rifles and similar firearms as well as any ammunition magazine holding more than 10 rounds—sizes that come standard on most modern rifles and handguns. He would pay some owners to surrender the affected guns they legally own and force everyone else to register the guns under the National Firearms Act. The proposal would require owners to pay a $200 tax stamp for each item.
Not only would he charge you to keep your AR-15, you’d have to become part of a new gun registry.
This is another reason why we have to win the two Senate seats in Georgia on January 5th and keep fighting the RINOs in our party, to keep Biden from being able to do this stuff legislatively.
The next four years are going to be a long four years if Trump doesn’t win soon…


therightscoop--2020-11-23--WATCH: New Jerseyans catch their Democrat governor eating out with his family

Democratic Governor Phil Murphy was caught eating out with this family when a couple of people took notice of him @ @ @ @ @ cursing ) : I can understand people having contempt for Murphy after all of the @ @ @ @ @ put on them this year .
And I ’ m not here to defend him @ @ @ @ @ a much bigger deal if he weren ’ t out eating with this family .
@ @ @ @ @ is that by the end of the video Murphy had put on his mask , @ @ @ @ @ him or something from these ladies .
It was like his knee-jerk reaction or something @ @ @ @ @ not how it works .
If those ladies had COVID then that surgical mask wouldn @ @ @ @ @ viral microns from getting into his system .
But oh well , I guess he @ @ @

Democratic Governor Phil Murphy was caught eating out with this family when a couple of people took notice of him (WARNING: Lots of cursing):
New Jersey Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy is confronted for eating at a restaurant and not wearing a mask while having dinner with his family:pic.twitter.com/kUZ3Qhml0D — Alex Salvi (@alexsalvinews) November 23, 2020
I can understand people having contempt for Murphy after all of the onerous restrictions he’s put on them this year. And I’m not here to defend him, but this would be a much bigger deal if he weren’t out eating with this family.
What I did find hilarious is that by the end of the video Murphy had put on his mask, as if it would protect him or something from these ladies. It was like his knee-jerk reaction or something.
But that’s not how it works. If those ladies had COVID then that surgical mask wouldn’t have prevented their viral microns from getting into his system. But oh well, I guess he felt safer.


therightscoop--2020-11-26--BREAKING: 11th Circuit just granted Lin Wood’s appeal in Georgia!

The 11th Circuit just granted Lin Wood ’ s appeal in Georgia that was dismissed last week regarding the election @ @ @ @ @ : “ Thanksgiving Eve News !
11th Circuit granted my Emergency Motion for Expedited Review @ @ @ @ @ GA election procedure .
We The People delivered a historic landslide win for @ realDonaldTrump @ @ @ @ @ We The People will not allow it be stolen.
” The Appellees must respond by @ @ @ @ @ next Tuesday .
If Lin Wood responds to their statement , it must be by @ @ @ @ @ looks like it ’ s finally underway while the media is busy slobbering all over @ @ @ @ @ Incidentally , there ’ s another lawsuit filed in Georgia by the Amistad Project .
@ @ @ @ @ over 100k votes :

The 11th Circuit just granted Lin Wood’s appeal in Georgia that was dismissed last week regarding the election certification:
Thanksgiving Eve News! 11th Circuit granted my Emergency Motion for Expedited Review of lawsuit challenging validity of GA election procedure. We The People delivered a historic landslide win for @realDonaldTrump in GA & nationally. We The People will not allow it be stolen. pic.twitter.com/YVFmaZzuYj — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) November 26, 2020
Lin Wood writes: “Thanksgiving Eve News! 11th Circuit granted my Emergency Motion for Expedited Review of lawsuit challenging validity of GA election procedure. We The People delivered a historic landslide win for @realDonaldTrump in GA & nationally. We The People will not allow it be stolen.”
The Appellees must respond by December 1st, which is next Tuesday. If Lin Wood responds to their statement, it must be by December 3rd.
So it looks like it’s finally underway while the media is busy slobbering all over Biden’s ring.
Incidentally, there’s another lawsuit filed in Georgia by the Amistad Project. It appears to be contesting over 100k votes:
BREAKING: The Amistad Project today filed lawsuit contesting GA results, citing expert opinion "that well over 100,000 illegal votes were improperly counted, while tens of thousands of legal votes were not counted." More @JustTheNews @RealAmVoice https://t.co/efAsprYNG6 pic.twitter.com/T78tn2cvFi — Carrie Sheffield (@carriesheffield) November 25, 2020


therightscoop--2020-11-25--BREAKING: President Trump pardons Michael Flynn!

President Trump just pardoned Michael Flynn , according to reports just breaking : President Trump on Wednesday pardoned his former @ @ @ @ @ , bringing to end a tumultuous four-year criminal case that felled the three-star general before @ @ @ @ @ they had improperly pursued his case .
Flynn , a retired Army lieutenant general , @ @ @ @ @ to the FBI about talking with a Russian diplomat during the 2016 Trump administration transition @ @ @ @ @ Barr earlier this year asked a federal court in Washington , D.C. , to allow @ @ @ @ @ the case .
However , the matter has since been tied up in legal proceedings @ @ @ @ @ and his lawyer Sidney Powell of the decision Wednesday afternoon , ahead of the Thanksgiving @ @

President Trump just pardoned Michael Flynn, according to reports just breaking:
Here’s more:
President Trump on Wednesday pardoned his former national security adviser Michael Flynn, bringing to end a tumultuous four-year criminal case that felled the three-star general before prosecutors reversed course and declared they had improperly pursued his case.
Flynn, a retired Army lieutenant general, had pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about talking with a Russian diplomat during the 2016 Trump administration transition period.
Attorney General William Barr earlier this year asked a federal court in Washington, D.C., to allow the Justice Department to drop the case. However, the matter has since been tied up in legal proceedings.
Trump informed the general and his lawyer Sidney Powell of the decision Wednesday afternoon, ahead of the Thanksgiving Day.


therightscoop--2020-11-25--Obama trashes Hispanic Trump supporters as evangelical Christian bigots

Obama was on with the leftist Breakfast Club radio show this morning where he trashed Hispanics who voted for Trump as Christian bigots : Obama starts out noting that Democrats were shocked that so many Hispanics voted for Trump : He then proceeds to trash them as evangelical Christian bigots : But there ’ s a lot of evangelical Hispanics who , you know , the fact that Trump says racist things about Mexicans or puts uh , detainees , uh you know , uh , uh , undocumented workers in cages , they think that ’ s less important @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he supports their views on , you know , gay marriage or abortion .
You know what Obama ’ s talking about .
It ’ s what he already said about people who don ’ t support him or the left ’ s socialist agenda : Now he ’ s applying the same bitter clinger rationale to actual immigrants , accusing them of being self-hating as long as they have a president who supports their bigoted views against gays and their backward views on ‘ choice ’ .
Obama hasn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ still the arrogant schmuck he was while in office .

Obama was on with the leftist Breakfast Club radio show this morning where he trashed Hispanics who voted for Trump as Christian bigots:
Obama on @breakfastclubam: “… There’s a lot of evangelical Hispanics who, the fact that Trump says racist things about Mexicans, or puts undocumented workers in cages, they think that’s less important than the fact that he supports their views on gay marriage or abortion." pic.twitter.com/8OpocwYrLV — The Recount (@therecount) November 25, 2020
Obama starts out noting that Democrats were shocked that so many Hispanics voted for Trump:
Um, people were surprised about uh, a lot of Hispanic folks who voted for Trump.
He then proceeds to trash them as evangelical Christian bigots:
But there’s a lot of evangelical Hispanics who, you know, the fact that Trump says racist things about Mexicans or puts uh, detainees, uh you know, uh, uh, undocumented workers in cages, they think that’s less important than the fact that, you know, he supports their views on, you know, gay marriage or abortion.
You know what Obama’s talking about. It’s what he already said about people who don’t support him or the left’s socialist agenda:
“They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
Now he’s applying the same bitter clinger rationale to actual immigrants, accusing them of being self-hating as long as they have a president who supports their bigoted views against gays and their backward views on ‘choice’.
Obama hasn’t changed one bit. He’s still the arrogant schmuck he was while in office.


therightscoop--2020-11-25--[UPDATE: AG appeals decision] – Pennsylvania judge halts further action on certification of election

[UPDATE: AG appeals decision] – Pennsylvania judge halts further action on certification of election results, grants hearing on mail-in ballots

It ’ s being reported now that a Pennsylvania judge has blocked the state from certifying the 2020 election results : Jenny Ellis announced it , but her headline is a bit different , saying the Pennsylvania Court has granted a hearing on mail-in ballots : But she does note the blocking of any further action on certification : Be careful to note exactly what the judge says here regarding the certification : As to the Supplemental Emergency Application , to the extent that there remains any further action to perfect the certification of the results of the 2020 General @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vice President of the United States of America , Respondents are preliminarily enjoined from doing so , pending an evidentiary hearing to be held on Friday , November 27 , 2020 at 11:30 am via WebEx .
It ’ s important to point out that the election results were certified yesterday and signed by the governor : I don ’ t know if there remains any further action to perfect the certification or not .
It might be a moot ruling at this point if everything was completed already .
But if not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should halt whatever remains .
UPDATE : Apparently this ruling stopped something , because the state ’ s leftist AG just appealed the decision : That appeal has been filed , according to a press release : “ Respondents did file a notice of appeal , seeking to have the Pennsylvania Supreme Court review and overturn the Commonwealth Court ’ s injunction .
The Petitioners have until Friday , November 27 , 2020 at 3:00 p.m. to respond to the Respondents ’ notice of appeal.
” I ’ m sure the activist judges @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wants and they ’ ll go ahead and cerity .
What is Josh Shapiro so afraid of ?

It’s being reported now that a Pennsylvania judge has blocked the state from certifying the 2020 election results:
NEWS: Pennsylvania judge blocks state from certifying election results in presidential and all other races.@EpochTimes Source: https://t.co/KD2QqGFCPj pic.twitter.com/sP7hecZnjr — Ivan Pentchoukov (@IvanPentchoukov) November 25, 2020
Jenny Ellis announced it, but her headline is a bit different, saying the Pennsylvania Court has granted a hearing on mail-in ballots:
🚨BREAKING: Pennsylvania Court grants hearing in election integrity case challenging the constitutionality of Act 77 (mail-in ballots). pic.twitter.com/eHqtjnf4by — Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) November 25, 2020
But she does note the blocking of any further action on certification:
Why this is IMPORTANT. pic.twitter.com/v40Fo21UbA — Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) November 25, 2020
Be careful to note exactly what the judge says here regarding the certification:
As to the Supplemental Emergency Application, to the extent that there remains any further action to perfect the certification of the results of the 2020 General Election for the offices of President and Vice President of the United States of America, Respondents are preliminarily enjoined from doing so, pending an evidentiary hearing to be held on Friday, November 27, 2020 at 11:30 am via WebEx.
It’s important to point out that the election results were certified yesterday and signed by the governor:
Today @PAStateDept certified the results of the November 3 election in Pennsylvania for president and vice president of the United States. As required by federal law, I’ve signed the Certificate of Ascertainment for the slate of electors for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. — Governor Tom Wolf (@GovernorTomWolf) November 24, 2020
I don’t know if there remains any further action to perfect the certification or not. It might be a moot ruling at this point if everything was completed already. But if not, then the judge’s ruling should halt whatever remains.
UPDATE: Apparently this ruling stopped something, because the state’s leftist AG just appealed the decision:
This order does not impact yesterday’s appointment of electors. We will be filing an appeal with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court momentarily. https://t.co/wRzFwPvJIO — AG Josh Shapiro (@PAAttorneyGen) November 25, 2020
That appeal has been filed, according to a press release: “Respondents did file a notice of appeal, seeking to have the Pennsylvania Supreme Court review and overturn the Commonwealth Court’s injunction. The Petitioners have until Friday, November 27, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. to respond to the Respondents’ notice of appeal.”
I’m sure the activist judges will give Josh Shapiro the injunction he wants and they’ll go ahead and cerity. What is Josh Shapiro so afraid of?


therightscoop--2020-11-25--WATCH LIVE: Pennsylvania Senate holds public hearing on 2020 election at 12:30PM

The Pennsylvania Senate will hold a public hearing on the 2020 election today at 12:30PM and you can watch below @ @ @ @ @ campaign statement yesterday : The first hearing , held by the Pennsylvania State Senate , @ @ @ @ @ Wednesday , November 25th , in Gettysburg , PA , where each participating Senator will @ @ @ @ @ followed by testimony from witnesses who have filed affidavits attesting to 2020 election fraud .
@ @ @ @ @ also feature a presentation from former NY City Mayor and Personal Attorney to President Trump @ @ @ @ @ ’ s also a report from last night that suggests Trump will be in Gettysburg @ @ @ @ @ some kind of announcement : UPDATE : It looks like Trump ’ s trip to @ @ @ @ @

The Pennsylvania Senate will hold a public hearing on the 2020 election today at 12:30PM and you can watch below:
According to the Trump campaign statement yesterday:
The first hearing, held by the Pennsylvania State Senate, will be conducted tomorrow, Wednesday, November 25th, in Gettysburg, PA, where each participating Senator will give a five-minute opening statement followed by testimony from witnesses who have filed affidavits attesting to 2020 election fraud. Tomorrow’s hearing will also feature a presentation from former NY City Mayor and Personal Attorney to President Trump, Rudy Giuliani.
There’s also a report from last night that suggests Trump will be in Gettysburg with Giuliani today to make some kind of announcement:
News: Trump is expected to join Giuliani in Gettysburg, PA tomorrow where GOP state lawmakers are holding a "hearing" on allegations of fraud in the 2020 election, two sources familiar with the plans tell me.
Not on his schedule, but being planned as an unannounced movement — Jeremy Diamond (@JDiamond1) November 25, 2020
UPDATE: It looks like Trump’s trip to Gettysburg has been canceled:
Trump's trip to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania with Rudy Giuliani has just been canceled, 2 sources tell me & @KristenhCNN
Comes after Giuliani was exposed to a 2nd person in the last week who tested positive for coronavirus — Jeremy Diamond (@JDiamond1) November 25, 2020


therightscoop--2020-11-25--Nevada judge agrees to hear illegal voting evidence from Trump campaign and more

According to Matt Schlapp , a Nevada state judge has agreed to hear evidence illegal voting from the Trump campaign and will allow them to depose witnesses in Clark County who know what really happened : Here ’ s what Schlapp said in the video : For the first time in this whole tragic story of the 2020 presidential election , a state court has granted Republicans in Nevada and the Trump campaign the ability to present their case of widespread illegal balloting and to depose up to 15 people who know what went down in Clark County in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ big news .
A lot of people in the national media have said if you have evidence of voter fraud , show it .
Well we have thousands and thousands of examples of real people in real life instances of voter illegality and I just think it ’ s a great step to present it in court .
If we get a fair hearing , I believe the results in Nevada should be switched .
It sounds promising , but it also sounds like a lot of work to be done so late @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they can pull it off , but I ’ m not going to get my hopes up too high…

According to Matt Schlapp, a Nevada state judge has agreed to hear evidence illegal voting from the Trump campaign and will allow them to depose witnesses in Clark County who know what really happened:
Breaking News: NV judge agrees to hear evidence of illegal voting and allow Republicans/Trump campaign to depose those who know about the dirty deeds of campaign 2020. Big News! 🚨🚨 pic.twitter.com/53bbWGD5gY — Matt Schlapp (@mschlapp) November 25, 2020
Here’s what Schlapp said in the video:
For the first time in this whole tragic story of the 2020 presidential election, a state court has granted Republicans in Nevada and the Trump campaign the ability to present their case of widespread illegal balloting and to depose up to 15 people who know what went down in Clark County in the state of Nevada. So this is big news. A lot of people in the national media have said if you have evidence of voter fraud, show it. Well we have thousands and thousands of examples of real people in real life instances of voter illegality and I just think it’s a great step to present it in court. If we get a fair hearing, I believe the results in Nevada should be switched.
It sounds promising, but it also sounds like a lot of work to be done so late in the game. I sincerely hope they can pull it off, but I’m not going to get my hopes up too high…


therightscoop--2020-11-25--REPORT: Trump plans to pardon Michael Flynn

It ’ s being reported now that President Trump is planning to pardon Michael Flynn and end his seemingly unending legal travails once and for all : AXIOS – President Trump has told confidants he plans to pardon his former national security adviser Michael Flynn , who pleaded guilty in December 2017 to lying to the FBI about his Russian contacts , two sources with direct knowledge of the discussions tell Axios .
Sources with direct knowledge of the discussions said Flynn will be part of a series of pardons that Trump issues between now and when he leaves office @ @ @ @ @ @ @ acknowledged at a hearing in September that she had spoken to Trump recently and had requested that he not issue a pardon .
It ’ s unclear what discussions Powell and the president have had since then .
Trump ’ s pardon of Flynn would take the matter out of the hands of the courts and of a Biden-controlled Justice Department .
If Trump is to lose this election , then a pardon of Flynn would be a must .
The truth is it ’ s absolutely ridiculous that this saga has continued @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DOJ has officially dropped the charges .
But without a pardon , Biden ’ s DOJ would no doubt try and continue the prosecution against Flynn , seizing on the objections of the corrupt Judge Sullivan , and that would just unthinkable .
Trump must pardon Flynn .
It ’ s time to end this .

It’s being reported now that President Trump is planning to pardon Michael Flynn and end his seemingly unending legal travails once and for all:
SCOOP: Trump has told confidants he plans to pardon Michael Flynn, per two sources with direct knowledge. https://t.co/GyHvWcn6NO — Jonathan Swan (@jonathanvswan) November 25, 2020
AXIOS – President Trump has told confidants he plans to pardon his former national security adviser Michael Flynn, who pleaded guilty in December 2017 to lying to the FBI about his Russian contacts, two sources with direct knowledge of the discussions tell Axios. Sources with direct knowledge of the discussions said Flynn will be part of a series of pardons that Trump issues between now and when he leaves office. Flynn’s lawyer Sidney Powell acknowledged at a hearing in September that she had spoken to Trump recently and had requested that he not issue a pardon. It’s unclear what discussions Powell and the president have had since then. Trump’s pardon of Flynn would take the matter out of the hands of the courts and of a Biden-controlled Justice Department.
If Trump is to lose this election, then a pardon of Flynn would be a must. The truth is it’s absolutely ridiculous that this saga has continued on for this long considering that the DOJ has officially dropped the charges. But without a pardon, Biden’s DOJ would no doubt try and continue the prosecution against Flynn, seizing on the objections of the corrupt Judge Sullivan, and that would just unthinkable.
Trump must pardon Flynn. It’s time to end this.


therightscoop--2020-11-25--YouTube suspends and demonetizes OANN over ‘fake’ coronavirus cure

YouTube has suspended and demonetized OANN for reporting on a drug that it says is a ‘ fake cure ’ for the coronavirus : NBC BOSTON – YouTube on Tuesday barred One America News Network from posting new videos and livestreaming for one week , after the right-leaning media organization uploaded a fake cure for the coronavirus .
“ After careful review , we removed a video from OANN and issued a strike on the channel for violating our COVID-19 misinformation policy , which prohibits content claiming there ’ s a guaranteed cure , ” a YouTube spokesperson told CNBC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violations of our Covid-19 misinformation policy and other channel monetization policies , we ’ ve suspended the channel from the YouTube Partner Program and as a result , its monetization on YouTube .
It was unclear what specifically OANN ’ s video said about a Covid-19 cure that made YouTube decide to suspend the channel .
The organization will have to reapply to YouTube ’ s Partner Program ( YPP ) if it wants the ability to make money off of its existing content again .
YPP is YouTube ’ s program that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advertisers .
YouTube said broadly that companies will only be readmitted after they ’ ve fixed the issues that led to suspension .
Here ’ s the video that OANN posted back in August of this year on Ivermectin : They reported on a drug that doctors in Australia were having major success with .
So what ?
It ’ s not like I can just go and prescribe myself Ivermectin if I want it .
Only my doctor can prescribe it , so what ’ s the harm in OANN doing a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s true that NIH doesn ’ t recommend it , and you can read about that here .
But why does that mean that OANN should be punished for doing a report on it ?
If doctors don ’ t like it they don ’ t have to use it !
Google is becoming more and more totalitarian by the day .

YouTube has suspended and demonetized OANN for reporting on a drug that it says is a ‘fake cure’ for the coronavirus:
NBC BOSTON – YouTube on Tuesday barred One America News Network from posting new videos and livestreaming for one week, after the right-leaning media organization uploaded a fake cure for the coronavirus. “After careful review, we removed a video from OANN and issued a strike on the channel for violating our COVID-19 misinformation policy, which prohibits content claiming there’s a guaranteed cure,” a YouTube spokesperson told CNBC. “Additionally, due to repeated violations of our Covid-19 misinformation policy and other channel monetization policies, we’ve suspended the channel from the YouTube Partner Program and as a result, its monetization on YouTube. It was unclear what specifically OANN’s video said about a Covid-19 cure that made YouTube decide to suspend the channel. The organization will have to reapply to YouTube’s Partner Program (YPP) if it wants the ability to make money off of its existing content again. YPP is YouTube’s program that connects large channels on the platform with advertisers. YouTube said broadly that companies will only be readmitted after they’ve fixed the issues that led to suspension.
Here’s the video that OANN posted back in August of this year on Ivermectin:
They reported on a drug that doctors in Australia were having major success with. So what?
It’s not like I can just go and prescribe myself Ivermectin if I want it. Only my doctor can prescribe it, so what’s the harm in OANN doing a legitimate report on it?
Yes it’s true that NIH doesn’t recommend it, and you can read about that here. But why does that mean that OANN should be punished for doing a report on it? If doctors don’t like it they don’t have to use it!
Google is becoming more and more totalitarian by the day.


therightscoop--2020-11-24--Lin Wood says Sidney Powell will file her Dominion lawsuit tomorrow and vouches for it BIG TIME

Lin Wood tweeted today that Sidney Powell will file her Dominion lawsuit in court tomorrow in Georgia , and he @ @ @ @ @ In case the tweet doesn ’ t show for you , Lin Wood says : @ @ @ @ @ @ SidneyPowell1 & others over recent weeks .
The lawsuit Sidney will be filing tomorrow @ @ @ @ @ Enemies of America will deny its allegations .
Do NOT believe them .
Believe Sidney @ @ @ @ @ America & freedom .
Our enemies do not .
That ’ s a big statement @ @ @ @ @ of people are hoping this lawsuit is the real deal and aren ’ t prejudging @ @ @ @ @ .
But these are also people who are getting used to being burned by others @ @ @ @ @ .
Right now both Powell and Wood have a lot of credibility on the right @ @ @ @ @ they live up to it .

Lin Wood tweeted today that Sidney Powell will file her Dominion lawsuit in court tomorrow in Georgia, and he adamantly vouches for it:
I have worked closely with @SidneyPowell1 & others over recent weeks. The lawsuit Sidney will be filing tomorrow in GA speaks TRUTH. Enemies of America will deny its allegations. Do NOT believe them. Believe Sidney & me. We love America & freedom. Our enemies do not. pic.twitter.com/JyLkqCMd3W — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) November 24, 2020
In case the tweet doesn’t show for you, Lin Wood says:
I have worked closely with @SidneyPowell1 & others over recent weeks. The lawsuit Sidney will be filing tomorrow in GA speaks TRUTH. Enemies of America will deny its allegations. Do NOT believe them. Believe Sidney & me. We love America & freedom. Our enemies do not.
That’s a big statement and I know a lot of people are hoping this lawsuit is the real deal and aren’t prejudging the situation like many others.
But these are also people who are getting used to being burned by others who have made big promises. Right now both Powell and Wood have a lot of credibility on the right and let’s hope they live up to it.


therightscoop--2020-11-24--BREAKING: Pennsylvania, Arizona and Michigan legislatures to hold public hearings on 2020 election a

BREAKING: Pennsylvania, Arizona and Michigan legislatures to hold public hearings on 2020 election as soon as TOMORROW

The Trump campaign has just announced that Pennsylvania , Arizona and Michigan will hold public hearings on the 2020 election @ @ @ @ @ beginning tomorrow .
Here ’ s what the press release says regarding Pennsylvania : The @ @ @ @ @ the Pennsylvania State Senate , will be conducted tomorrow , Wednesday , November 25th , @ @ @ @ @ where each participating Senator will give a five-minute opening statement followed by testimony from witnesses @ @ @ @ @ to 2020 election fraud .
Tomorrow ’ s hearing will also feature a presentation from @ @ @ @ @ Personal Attorney to President Trump , Rudy Giuliani .
On Monday , November 30th , @ @ @ @ @ their own hearing , followed by the Michigan legislature holding their own hearing on Tuesday @ @ @ @ @ for both hearings to follow .
Assuming the Pennsylvania hearing is live streamed , we @ @ @ @ @ you tomorrow so you can see the hearing for yourself .

The Trump campaign has just announced that Pennsylvania, Arizona and Michigan will hold public hearings on the 2020 election, with the Pennsylvania Senate beginning tomorrow.
🚨🚨🚨NEW: PENNSYLVANIA, ARIZONA, MICHIGAN LEGISLATURES TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS ON 2020 ELECTION Trump Legal Team Statement pic.twitter.com/T0Cy0VfI0G — Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) November 24, 2020
Here’s what the press release says regarding Pennsylvania:
The first hearing, held by the Pennsylvania State Senate, will be conducted tomorrow, Wednesday, November 25th, in Gettysburg, PA, where each participating Senator will give a five-minute opening statement followed by testimony from witnesses who have filed affidavits attesting to 2020 election fraud. Tomorrow’s hearing will also feature a presentation from former NY City Mayor and Personal Attorney to President Trump, Rudy Giuliani.
On Arizona and Michigan:
On Monday, November 30th, the Arizona legislature will hold their own hearing, followed by the Michigan legislature holding their own hearing on Tuesday, December 1st. Details for both hearings to follow.
Assuming the Pennsylvania hearing is live streamed, we’ll have it for you tomorrow so you can see the hearing for yourself.


Happy Thanksgiving!

Happy Thanksgiving everyone !
I hope you are all enjoying big meals with family and friends today .
That ’ s what I ’ ll be doing .
As always , it ’ s a time to reflect on what we are thankful for and once again , my Catholic faith rises to the top of my list .
I ’ ve learned so much since I began this journey in 2017 and I want to share it with you far more than you know .
In that vein , I do have one video that really hit me hard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
I can ’ t think of a better time to share it than now : It ’ s a great video for all Christians including all non-Catholics .
Let me know what you think of it .
I ’ m also thankful for my family which is mostly intact ( you know how that goes , I ’ m sure ) .
I ’ ll be dining with my mom , my sister and her extended family today .
And hopefully watching the Cowboys beat up on the Redskins .
Along @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I ’ m grateful for my Church friends and how we get together to pray the rosary every week .
They are wonderful people and I love having them in my life .
Last but certainly not least , I am very thankful for all of you that come by and visit TRS so much .
Where would I be without you ?
Seriously .
I do hope you all have a wonderful Thanksgiving .
And for those of you who find yourselves all alone on this day , I hope you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chat it up with Right Scoopers below in the comments .
I ’ m sure there will be plenty of people in an out all day and I hope it gives you comfort .

Happy Thanksgiving everyone! I hope you are all enjoying big meals with family and friends today. That’s what I’ll be doing.
As always, it’s a time to reflect on what we are thankful for and once again, my Catholic faith rises to the top of my list. I’ve learned so much since I began this journey in 2017 and I want to share it with you far more than you know. In that vein, I do have one video that really hit me hard a few weeks ago when I saw it. I can’t think of a better time to share it than now:
It’s a great video for all Christians including all non-Catholics. Let me know what you think of it.
I’m also thankful for my family which is mostly intact (you know how that goes, I’m sure). I’ll be dining with my mom, my sister and her extended family today. And hopefully watching the Cowboys beat up on the Redskins.
Along the same lines as my Catholic faith, I’m grateful for my Church friends and how we get together to pray the rosary every week. They are wonderful people and I love having them in my life.
Last but certainly not least, I am very thankful for all of you that come by and visit TRS so much. Where would I be without you? Seriously.
I do hope you all have a wonderful Thanksgiving. And for those of you who find yourselves all alone on this day, I hope you know that you can came here and chat it up with Right Scoopers below in the comments. I’m sure there will be plenty of people in an out all day and I hope it gives you comfort.


therightscoop--2020-11-26--Supreme Court rules AGAINST Cuomo and blocks coronavirus restrictions on churches and synagogues in

Supreme Court rules AGAINST Cuomo and blocks coronavirus restrictions on churches and synagogues in Brooklyn

The Supreme Court just blocked Governor Cuomo from putting capacity limits on churches and synagogues in Brooklyn and Barrett was the deciding vote : NY POST – The Supreme Court late Wednesday temporarily blocked Gov .
Andrew Cuomo from setting capacity limits at houses of worship in certain state-designated coronavirus hot spots .
In a 5-4 decision , the nation ’ s highest court sided with the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and Orthodox Jewish synagogues that sued the governor over the state-imposed caps in areas declared red and orange zones .
“ Even in a pandemic , the Constitution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” the unsigned opinion said , according to The Washington Post .
“ The restrictions at issue here , by effectively barring many from attending religious services , strike at the very heart of the First Amendment ’ s guarantee of religious liberty.
” The ruling has little impact at this time since the groups that sued are not currently subjected to the attendance limits since they are in the less-restrictive yellow zones .
The houses of worship argued the restrictions , imposed by Cuomo on Oct. 6 , violated their religious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also felt they were unfairly facing stricter limitations than essential businesses .
Newly confirmed Justice Amy Coney Barrett cast the deciding assenting vote in favor of the religious groups .

The Supreme Court just blocked Governor Cuomo from putting capacity limits on churches and synagogues in Brooklyn and Barrett was the deciding vote:
NY POST – The Supreme Court late Wednesday temporarily blocked Gov. Andrew Cuomo from setting capacity limits at houses of worship in certain state-designated coronavirus hot spots.
In a 5-4 decision, the nation’s highest court sided with the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and Orthodox Jewish synagogues that sued the governor over the state-imposed caps in areas declared red and orange zones.
“Even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten,” the unsigned opinion said, according to The Washington Post.
“The restrictions at issue here, by effectively barring many from attending religious services, strike at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty.”
The ruling has little impact at this time since the groups that sued are not currently subjected to the attendance limits since they are in the less-restrictive yellow zones.
The houses of worship argued the restrictions, imposed by Cuomo on Oct. 6, violated their religious freedoms under the First Amendment. They also felt they were unfairly facing stricter limitations than essential businesses.
Newly confirmed Justice Amy Coney Barrett cast the deciding assenting vote in favor of the religious groups.


therightscoop--2020-11-27--‘ON TO SCOTUS!’ Trump election result challenge REJECTED by ‘activist judicial machinery’ of PA’s 3r

‘ON TO SCOTUS!’ Trump election result challenge REJECTED by ‘activist judicial machinery’ of PA’s 3rd Circuit

“ Free , fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy , ” wrote Pennsylvania Third Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas in the opinion rejecting the Trump campaigns election suit appeal from the three judge panel , which every media outlet is quick to characterize as a REPUBLICAN APPOINTED panel .
They might note that two of the three were appointed by George W. Bush .
Not exactly Trump judges , unlike the third member , who in fact IS a Trump appointee .
Nevertheless , Trump legal team ’ s Jenna Ellis , along with Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ activist judicial machinery ” of the state .
Still , the court ’ s ruling was absolutely brutal .
“ Charges of unfairness are serious .
But calling an election unfair does not make it so .
Charges require specific allegations and then proof .
We have neither here , ” it reads .
And that ’ s true , the campaign did not in fact allege fraud .
He said the word FAIR several times and we always hear about “ free and fair elections , ” but they sure seem to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ basis for a court case , so I don ’ t know .
But we ’ ll see what happens next .
So like I said , we ’ ll see .

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” wrote Pennsylvania Third Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas in the opinion rejecting the Trump campaigns election suit appeal from the three judge panel, which every media outlet is quick to characterize as a REPUBLICAN APPOINTED panel.
They might note that two of the three were appointed by George W. Bush. Not exactly Trump judges, unlike the third member, who in fact IS a Trump appointee.
Nevertheless, Trump legal team’s Jenna Ellis, along with Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, released a joint statement condemning the “activist judicial machinery” of the state.
.@RudyGiuliani and me on Third Circuit’s opinion: The activist judicial machinery in Pennsylvania continues to cover up the allegations of massive fraud. We are very thankful to have had the opportunity to present proof and the facts to the PA state legislature. On to SCOTUS! — Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) November 27, 2020
Still, the court’s ruling was absolutely brutal. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” it reads. And that’s true, the campaign did not in fact allege fraud.
He said the word FAIR several times and we always hear about “free and fair elections,” but they sure seem to think that fairness is not a sufficient basis for a court case, so I don’t know.
"As discussed, the Campaign cannot win this lawsuit. It conceded that it is not alleging
election fraud. It has already raised and lost most of these state-law issues, and it cannot
relitigate them here." — Ed Morrissey (@EdMorrissey) November 27, 2020
But we’ll see what happens next.
UPDATE Mark Levin adds:
1. It’s very unfortunate that the two federal courts in Pennsylvania are slamming the door shut and rejectIng serious equal protection issues and preventIng discovery on fraud issues. And these opinions are very political in nature. — Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) November 27, 2020
2. There’s a second case in Pennsylvania state court where the rogue state Supreme Court has stepped in to try to prevent the court from actually conducting a hearing. We will know more about that on Monday. https://t.co/m3l2sJfPzX — Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) November 27, 2020
So like I said, we’ll see.


therightscoop--2020-11-27--‘You’re g– d**n right, we want to criminalize policy differences’ – Olbermann says out loud what CNN

‘You’re g– d**n right, we want to criminalize policy differences’ – Olbermann says out loud what CNN merely implies

Speaking of biased media and the press ’ s war on the American people , one of the biggest mouths on the progressive left media is Keith Olbermann , who was too much of a misogynist to stay on air at MSNBC but is still spewing from a bunker somewhere .
He ’ s the outside voice version of what CNN and the rest are already thinking ( and trying to accomplish ) without quite spelling it out .
In this case , he ’ s saying what the Democrats and left and Obama and Biden and Brianna Keiler and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and Bald Guy and Steve Schmidt ’ s NeverTrump Club and the rest have been trying to do for decades : outlaw wrongthink .
Watch the blasphemous language , which of course Satan can ’ t resist .
“ G– d**n it !
When the policy differences are between maintaining American democracy and substituting racist , one party rule .
You ’ re G– d**n right , we want to criminalize policy differences that might exist between the outgoing administration and the administration that is about to take over.
” That ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ loud , it ’ s giving the whole thing away .
Not that it was any big secret .

Speaking of biased media and the press’s war on the American people, one of the biggest mouths on the progressive left media is Keith Olbermann, who was too much of a misogynist to stay on air at MSNBC but is still spewing from a bunker somewhere. He’s the outside voice version of what CNN and the rest are already thinking (and trying to accomplish) without quite spelling it out.
In this case, he’s saying what the Democrats and left and Obama and Biden and Brianna Keiler and Jim Acosta and the Fat, Dumb, and Bald Guy and Steve Schmidt’s NeverTrump Club and the rest have been trying to do for decades: outlaw wrongthink.
Watch the blasphemous language, which of course Satan can’t resist.
Speaking for progressives, Keith Olbermann says that they want to imprison Trump and every Trump supporter—so many that they’d have to build new buildings or convert Trump’s properties into prisons to fit everyone they want to imprison. pic.twitter.com/tkn2MaiuYM — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) November 25, 2020
“G– d**n it! When the policy differences are between maintaining American democracy and substituting racist, one party rule. You’re G– d**n right, we want to criminalize policy differences that might exist between the outgoing administration and the administration that is about to take over.”
That’s not just saying the quiet part loud, it’s giving the whole thing away.
Not that it was any big secret.


therightscoop--2020-11-27--DAMNING proof of biased media using COVID reporting as POLITICAL weapon against states that vote ‘wr

DAMNING proof of biased media using COVID reporting as POLITICAL weapon against states that vote ‘wrong’

“ Many of you probably did not know the dire situation in… ” They ’ ve been giving the worst Covid governor a pass for months , and he ’ s even getting an Emmy for his pressers full of excuses and lies ( and book deal besides . )
But just how biased ARE the media in their Covid reporting ?
You could point at CNN running death tolls on screen for months – including during the entire RNC ( but not DNC ) – putting the grim numbers on screen every day until they declared Biden a winner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hundreds of reports that start with the word “ maskless ” when it ’ s about a Republican in public but making excuses for Pelosi and the rest when they ’ re caught over and over doing rules for thee but not for me guideline violations .
But let ’ s make it easier and use a tale of two states .
“ Last week , Illinois reported 15,415 cases in a single day , more than Florida ever did in a single day .
This is despite Illinois ’ population being 40 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tweet from Youyang Gu .
“ Many of you probably did not know the dire situation in Illinois .
That ’ s because no mainstream media chose to report it.
” Read his thread showing how the difference between the 5 ALARM RED FLASHING LIGHT coverage of a southern state vs. a favored ( Democrat ) state .
There ’ s nothing beneath the press .
Especially not playing dirty pandemic politics .

“Many of you probably did not know the dire situation in…”
They’ve been giving the worst Covid governor a pass for months, and he’s even getting an Emmy for his pressers full of excuses and lies (and book deal besides.)
But just how biased ARE the media in their Covid reporting? You could point at CNN running death tolls on screen for months – including during the entire RNC (but not DNC) – putting the grim numbers on screen every day until they declared Biden a winner. Or you could point out the hundreds of reports that start with the word “maskless” when it’s about a Republican in public but making excuses for Pelosi and the rest when they’re caught over and over doing rules for thee but not for me guideline violations.
But let’s make it easier and use a tale of two states.
“Last week, Illinois reported 15,415 cases in a single day, more than Florida ever did in a single day. This is despite Illinois’ population being 40% lower,” reads the first tweet from Youyang Gu. “Many of you probably did not know the dire situation in Illinois. That’s because no mainstream media chose to report it.”
That’s right.
Read his thread showing how the difference between the 5 ALARM RED FLASHING LIGHT coverage of a southern state vs. a favored (Democrat) state.
Last week, Illinois reported 15,415 cases in a single day, more than Florida ever did in a single day. This is despite Illinois' population being 40% lower. Many of you probably did not know the dire situation in Illinois. That's because no mainstream media chose to report it. pic.twitter.com/FuqvskMv5y — Youyang Gu (@youyanggu) November 24, 2020
Here is how the media chose to report Illinois now (left) vs Florida in July (right). Unfortunately, no national news outlet is covering the situation in Illinois. pic.twitter.com/8VJ4fMIya4 — Youyang Gu (@youyanggu) November 24, 2020
No other state has ever averaged 12,000 cases a day for a whole week. Not even Florida (1.7x pop), California (3x pop), and Texas (2.3x pop). For deaths per capita, Illinois also exceeded the peak deaths in Florida twice, once in May and once again now. So why is this not news? pic.twitter.com/lO7PS2UAyU — Youyang Gu (@youyanggu) November 24, 2020
On the surface, Illinois has done many things "right": – Mask mandate since May 1
– $5M ad campaign to encourage mask wearing
– Closing indoor dining/bars at end of October
– Stay at home advisory in Chicago and additional statewide restrictions enacted last week — Youyang Gu (@youyanggu) November 24, 2020
We hear a lot of the talk about how the deaths in Florida were "preventable". What about the ones in Illinois? I tried to search for discussions on what went wrong in Illinois or whether we could have mitigated/prevented the situation, but I couldn't find much. — Youyang Gu (@youyanggu) November 24, 2020
I don't want to spark a political debate here. I just hope that more people can recognize that the news we consume online can be inherently biased. They often serve to fuel division (and clicks). The sooner we can recognize that, the sooner we can come together. — Youyang Gu (@youyanggu) November 24, 2020
There’s nothing beneath the press. Especially not playing dirty pandemic politics.


therightscoop--2020-11-29--BREAKING: Pennsylvania Supreme Court throws out lawsuit challenging constitutionality of mail-in bal

BREAKING: Pennsylvania Supreme Court throws out lawsuit challenging constitutionality of mail-in ballot law

The activist Supreme Court of Pennsylvania just tossed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the legislature to create a law that expanded mail-in voting .
This is the same case we reported on earlier that a lower state judge felt had enough merit to suspend the certification process from completing : CBS PITTSBURGH – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dismissed the lawsuit from Congressman Mike Kelly and congressional candidate Sean Parnell to declare universal mail-in voting unconstitutional in the state and deny the votes of the majority of Pennsylvanians who voted by mail in the Nov. 3 election .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Saturday , based on the “ Petitioners ’ failure to file their facial constitutional challenge in a timely manner.
” In the lawsuit , the plaintiffs specifically cited issue with Act 77 and its “ universal mail-in ballot provisions.
” They alleged the provisions that allowed all qualified electors to vote by mail in Pennsylvania were unconstitutional .
They called for mail-in ballots that they alleged did not meet “ constitutional requirements ” to not be certified and for only “ legal votes ” to be certified , or for the Pennsylvania General @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the legal costs of the plaintiffs .
This unfortunately was expected , given the politics of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court .
I expect this decision will be appealed to the Supreme Court , where it has a much likelier chance of getting a fair hearing .
Mark Levin responded to the decision on Twitter : UPDATE : Ed Morrissey has a different take on the decision and you can read about that here .

The activist Supreme Court of Pennsylvania just tossed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the legislature to create a law that expanded mail-in voting. This is the same case we reported on earlier that a lower state judge felt had enough merit to suspend the certification process from completing:
CBS PITTSBURGH – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dismissed the lawsuit from Congressman Mike Kelly and congressional candidate Sean Parnell to declare universal mail-in voting unconstitutional in the state and deny the votes of the majority of Pennsylvanians who voted by mail in the Nov. 3 election. The state Supreme Court dismissed the case on Saturday, based on the “Petitioners’ failure to file their facial constitutional challenge in a timely manner.” In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs specifically cited issue with Act 77 and its “universal mail-in ballot provisions.” They alleged the provisions that allowed all qualified electors to vote by mail in Pennsylvania were unconstitutional. They called for mail-in ballots that they alleged did not meet “constitutional requirements” to not be certified and for only “legal votes” to be certified, or for the Pennsylvania General Assembly to choose the electors and compensate the legal costs of the plaintiffs.
This unfortunately was expected, given the politics of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. I expect this decision will be appealed to the Supreme Court, where it has a much likelier chance of getting a fair hearing.
Mark Levin responded to the decision on Twitter:
1. The rogue PA Supreme Court is the most detestable court in the land. The Democrat majority doesn’t even pretend to sit as justices. — Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) November 29, 2020
2. They’re political hacks in black robes who have destroyed PA’s election system, unconstitutionally seized power from the state legislature, and sits as a Democrat-Party politburo. — Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) November 29, 2020
3. Rather than uphold the federal and state constitutions, it has shredded them. Stalinism lives.https://t.co/8CCkAp9TJo — Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) November 29, 2020
UPDATE: Ed Morrissey has a different take on the decision and you can read about that here.


therightscoop--2020-11-28--Ted Cruz shoots down Brennan for siding with Iran after assassination of top Iranian scientist

Yesterday a top Iranian scientist , responsible for Iran ’ s nuclear program , was assassinated in a shootout with @ @ @ @ @ it was disbanded… ’ says the AP ?
Uh yeah , right .
The assumption @ @ @ @ @ scientist , but I don ’ t believe there ’ s any proof of this @ @ @ @ @ s former hack CIA Chief John Brennan was very upset at the news , decrying @ @ @ @ @ act ’ : This is the same Brennan who referred to Jerusalem as Al-Quds back @ @ @ @ @ hit back at Brennan , noting he always sides with the Iranian zealots who chant @ @ @ @ @ Israel : Lowlife Brennan in turn accused Cruz of having a lawless attitude that makes @ @ @ @ @ Texas Senator : You see , Brennan would rather support phony deals with Iran that @ @ @ @ @ world turns a blind eye to their ‘ disbanded ’ nuclear weapons program .
We @ @ @ @ @ lie and Cruz is absolutely right to point it out .

Yesterday a top Iranian scientist, responsible for Iran’s nuclear program, was assassinated in a shootout with unknown assailants:
An Iranian scientist that Israel alleged led the Islamic Republic's military nuclear program before it was disbanded has been killed in a shootout, Iranian state television said.https://t.co/uCgiGMcEN0 — The Associated Press (@AP) November 27, 2020
‘Before it was disbanded…’ says the AP? Uh yeah, right.
The assumption is that Israel assassinated this scientist, but I don’t believe there’s any proof of this yet.
But Obama’s former hack CIA Chief John Brennan was very upset at the news, decrying it as a ‘criminal act’:
This was a criminal act & highly reckless. It risks lethal retaliation & a new round of regional conflict.
Iranian leaders would be wise to wait for the return of responsible American leadership on the global stage & to resist the urge to respond against perceived culprits. https://t.co/0uZhyBTM3S — John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) November 27, 2020
This is the same Brennan who referred to Jerusalem as Al-Quds back in 2010.
Ted Cruz hit back at Brennan, noting he always sides with the Iranian zealots who chant Death to America and against Israel:
It’s bizarre to see a former head of the CIA consistently side with Iranian zealots who chant “Death to America.” And reflexively condemn Israel. Does Joe Biden agree? https://t.co/H38OB1ejCr — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) November 27, 2020
Lowlife Brennan in turn accused Cruz of having a lawless attitude that makes him unworthy to be a Texas Senator:
It is typical for you to mischaracterize my comment. Your lawless attitude & simple-minded approach to serious national security matters demonstrate that you are unworthy to represent the good people of Texas. https://t.co/93WwclgAtS — John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) November 27, 2020
You see, Brennan would rather support phony deals with Iran that helps enrich them while the world turns a blind eye to their ‘disbanded’ nuclear weapons program. We all know where his loyalties lie and Cruz is absolutely right to point it out.


therightscoop--2020-11-28--Trump says Wisconsin recount is NOT about finding mistakes in the count…

There are headlines out of Wisconsin that suggests that Trump ’ s recount thus far has netted Biden more votes @ @ @ @ @ article is “ Trump campaign spends $ 3M on Wisconsin recount that increases Biden ’ @ @ @ @ @ doesn ’ t explicitly say , I think he ’ s responding to articles like @ @ @ @ @ recount is NOT about finding mistakes in the count , but rather about finding illegal @ @ @ @ @ recount is not about finding mistakes in the count , it is about finding people @ @ @ @ @ and that case will be brought after the recount is over , on Monday or @ @ @ @ @ many illegal votes .
Stay tuned !
” Trump also notes that they have massive @ @ @ @ @ , which should be headed to the Supreme Court :

There are headlines out of Wisconsin that suggests that Trump’s recount thus far has netted Biden more votes:
Milwaukee County officials announce the completion of the recount. It resulted in a net gain of 132 votes for @JoeBiden out of the nearly 460,000 votes cast. https://t.co/lX7whFLvqj — Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) November 28, 2020
The headline of the article is “Trump campaign spends $3M on Wisconsin recount that increases Biden’s lead.”
While Trump doesn’t explicitly say, I think he’s responding to articles like this when he says the recount is NOT about finding mistakes in the count, but rather about finding illegal votes:
“The Wisconsin recount is not about finding mistakes in the count, it is about finding people who have voted illegally, and that case will be brought after the recount is over, on Monday or Tuesday. We have found many illegal votes. Stay tuned!”
The Wisconsin recount is not about finding mistakes in the count, it is about finding people who have voted illegally, and that case will be brought after the recount is over, on Monday or Tuesday. We have found many illegal votes. Stay tuned! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 28, 2020
Trump also notes that they have massive proof in the Pennsylvania case, which should be headed to the Supreme Court:
Specific allegations were made, and we have massive proof, in the Pennsylvania case. Some people just don’t want to see it. They want nothing to do with saving our Country. Sad!!! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 28, 2020


therightscoop--2020-11-28--Pennsylvania judge upholds ruling blocking Pennsylvania from certifying election results AND suggest

Pennsylvania judge upholds ruling blocking Pennsylvania from certifying election results AND suggests the lawsuit will prevail

Last night Judge Patricia McCullough , the same judge who issued an injunction earlier this week blocking the finalization of the certification of the election in Pennsylvania , upheld her injunction and suggested that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail : LI – A Pennsylvania state court Judge has issued a preliminary injunction preventing Pennsylvania from taking any further steps to perfect its certification of the election , including but not limited to appointment of electors and transmission of necessary paperwork to the Electoral College , pending further court hearings and rulings .
The ruling upholds an injunction from earlier @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because of the findings made in the Opinion released tonight .
The case has been somewhat under the radar , because it doesn ’ t involve claims of fraud .
It appears to be a pretty straight legal argument .
This is not the federal court case that has received a lot of press attention and in which the Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied relief .
The issue in this case is whether legislative expansion of absentee balloting to broad mail-in balloting violated the Pennsylvania Constitution .
It ’ s not clear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ petitioners seek to preclude the Secretary of State from transmitting the certification or otherwise perfecting the electoral college selections .
Earlier in the week , Judge Patricia McCullough issued a temporary halt to the certification process , and that now is on appeal to the PA Supreme Court .
The Judge issued this Opinion to extend that halt pending further hearings , and to set forth the basis for the injunction , which could be relevant to the appeal .
As mentioned above , the original lawsuit is over the legislature passing a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to expand absentee balloting beyond what the Pennsylvania Constitution states .
It only allows for in-person voting on election day and absentee ballot voting based on certain qualifications .
The judge explained why this argument is a viable claim that ’ s likely to succeed on the merits : Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment .
Petitioners appear to have a viable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const .
Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77 .
Since this presents an issue of law which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties , this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim .
The judge also warned that the remedy sought by the plaintiffs would disenfranchise millions of voters : That being said , this Court is mindful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Petitioners would cause the disenfranchisement of the nearly seven million Pennsylvanians who voted in the 2020 General Election .
Specifically , Respondents claim that a temporary stay would disenfranchise voters as the legislature would appoint the electors to the Election College .
However , as noted , the legislature is not authorized to appoint the electors to the Electoral College until December 8 , the “ Federal Safe Harbor ” date for certifying results for presidential electors .
The Court agrees it would be untenable for the legislature to appoint the electors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method , as such action would result in the disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election – not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of Act 77 .
However , this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election .
Hence , Respondents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ result in providing emergency relief , than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election .
As William Jacobson notes , this ruling isn ’ t the final ruling on the merits , but simply stops the certification process to allow for an expedited hearing on the merits .
And it more than likely won ’ t survive an appeal the very activist Pennsylvania Supreme Court , which is already in progress via the AG .
But the last stop is the Supreme Court and there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ succeed there now that Roberts has been neutralized .
The biggest question will be the remedy for such a ruling should the law be deemed unconstitutional .
UPDATE : Jacobson addressed the ‘ automatic stay ’ issue brought up in the comments .
Here ’ s what he said : ( added ) Ed Morrissey points out that an automatic stay pending appeal may apply to the prior order .
However , it ’ s not clear to me whether and how such an automatic stay would apply to this new order .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the PA Supreme Court have been issued , and no new filings have been made regarding this new order .
There appears to be some ambiguity regarding this .
We ’ ll bring you more when we have it .

Last night Judge Patricia McCullough, the same judge who issued an injunction earlier this week blocking the finalization of the certification of the election in Pennsylvania, upheld her injunction and suggested that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail:
LI – A Pennsylvania state court Judge has issued a preliminary injunction preventing Pennsylvania from taking any further steps to perfect its certification of the election, including but not limited to appointment of electors and transmission of necessary paperwork to the Electoral College, pending further court hearings and rulings. The ruling upholds an injunction from earlier in the week, and is significant because of the findings made in the Opinion released tonight. The case has been somewhat under the radar, because it doesn’t involve claims of fraud. It appears to be a pretty straight legal argument. This is not the federal court case that has received a lot of press attention and in which the Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied relief. The issue in this case is whether legislative expansion of absentee balloting to broad mail-in balloting violated the Pennsylvania Constitution. It’s not clear what the relief would be; the petitioners seek to preclude the Secretary of State from transmitting the certification or otherwise perfecting the electoral college selections. Earlier in the week, Judge Patricia McCullough issued a temporary halt to the certification process, and that now is on appeal to the PA Supreme Court. The Judge issued this Opinion to extend that halt pending further hearings, and to set forth the basis for the injunction, which could be relevant to the appeal.
As mentioned above, the original lawsuit is over the legislature passing a law (ACT 77) in 2019 to expand absentee balloting beyond what the Pennsylvania Constitution states. It only allows for in-person voting on election day and absentee ballot voting based on certain qualifications.
The judge explained why this argument is a viable claim that’s likely to succeed on the merits:
Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77. Since this presents an issue of law which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties, this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim.
The judge also warned that the remedy sought by the plaintiffs would disenfranchise millions of voters:
That being said, this Court is mindful that one of the alternative reliefs noted by Petitioners would cause the disenfranchisement of the nearly seven million Pennsylvanians who voted in the 2020 General Election. Specifically, Respondents claim that a temporary stay would disenfranchise voters as the legislature would appoint the electors to the Election College. However, as noted, the legislature is not authorized to appoint the electors to the Electoral College until December 8, the “Federal Safe Harbor” date for certifying results for presidential electors. The Court agrees it would be untenable for the legislature to appoint the electors where an election has already occurred, if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method, as such action would result in the disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election – not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of Act 77. However, this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election. Hence, Respondents have not established that greater harm will result in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election.
As William Jacobson notes, this ruling isn’t the final ruling on the merits, but simply stops the certification process to allow for an expedited hearing on the merits. And it more than likely won’t survive an appeal the very activist Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which is already in progress via the AG. But the last stop is the Supreme Court and there’s a good chance it could succeed there now that Roberts has been neutralized. The biggest question will be the remedy for such a ruling should the law be deemed unconstitutional.
UPDATE: Jacobson addressed the ‘automatic stay’ issue brought up in the comments. Here’s what he said:
(added) Ed Morrissey points out that an automatic stay pending appeal may apply to the prior order. However, it’s not clear to me whether and how such an automatic stay would apply to this new order. As of this writing, no decisions from the PA Supreme Court have been issued, and no new filings have been made regarding this new order.
There appears to be some ambiguity regarding this. We’ll bring you more when we have it.


therightscoop--2020-11-29--Facebook ‘fact-checker’ Politifact gets fact BODY checked by Candace Owens, forced to CHANGE false r

Facebook ‘fact-checker’ Politifact gets fact BODY checked by Candace Owens, forced to CHANGE false rating

Let ’ s call this “ step one.
” Let ’ s also call it “ about dang time.
” Every one of us knows about , or has personally been subject to , the endless partisan biased manipulation and censorship of all conservative thought and opinion by tech and media .
And it ’ s not just thought and opinion but actual facts that can get you silenced and deplatformed .
It ’ s past time to fight back , and that ’ s exactly what Candace Owens did .
Owens has vowed to take on the Fact-checkers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doing just that .
And they have notched their first victory .
“ Weeks ago , @ Facebook censored a post of mine which truthfully stated that @ JoeBiden is NOT the President-elect , ” said Candace Owens this weekend .
“ So I got lawyers involved .
Conclusion ?
@ PolitiFact uncensored the post & admitted that they LIED by rating my post false .
The fact-checkers are lying for Democrats.
” She was censored for stating the actual fact that Biden is NOT the president-elect .
That ’ s just factual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Politifact .
They ’ re out there bashing Roy Blunt today too for the same thing , even though he is also correct .
And not just “ technically ” correct , but morally correct and sensible .
It doesn ’ t matter how much you THINK someone is guilty , they aren ’ t guilty until the verdict is rendered .
And it doesn ’ t matter how much you WANT Biden to be president so Kamala Harris can take over when his dog kills him , he ISN ’ T @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t president-elect until the electoral college , you know , ELECTS him .
Politifact obviously thinks that ’ s a petty fact , but who cares ?
It IS a fact and you can ’ t censor someone over it .
Or actually , they can censor someone over it and have been doing so repeatedly .
But not this time .
That ’ s one .
Step one .
We need a lot more steps .
Here ’ s her announcement about their plan to get them .

Let’s call this “step one.” Let’s also call it “about dang time.” Every one of us knows about, or has personally been subject to, the endless partisan biased manipulation and censorship of all conservative thought and opinion by tech and media. And it’s not just thought and opinion but actual facts that can get you silenced and deplatformed.
It’s past time to fight back, and that’s exactly what Candace Owens did.
Owens has vowed to take on the Fact-checkers, and has attorneys working on her behalf doing just that. And they have notched their first victory.
“Weeks ago, @Facebook censored a post of mine which truthfully stated that @JoeBiden is NOT the President-elect,” said Candace Owens this weekend. “So I got lawyers involved. Conclusion? @PolitiFact uncensored the post & admitted that they LIED by rating my post false. The fact-checkers are lying for Democrats.”
Weeks ago, @Facebook censored a post of mine which truthfully stated that @JoeBiden is NOT the President-elect.
So I got lawyers involved.
Conclusion? @PolitiFact uncensored the post & admitted that they LIED by rating my post false.
The fact-checkers are lying for Democrats. pic.twitter.com/l2rrLxzku7 — Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) November 28, 2020
Check it out.
At 8 Months pregnant, I unfortunately cannot fight on the ground alongside patriots like I am used to, but I am taking every measure to fight these communists in the court room. It is my goal to expose these lying “fact-checkers” one by one. @JoeBiden is NOT the President-elect. pic.twitter.com/hW4NLpK4tc — Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) November 28, 2020
She was censored for stating the actual fact that Biden is NOT the president-elect. That’s just factual. Sorry about your little MSM feelings, Politifact.
They’re out there bashing Roy Blunt today too for the same thing, even though he is also correct. And not just “technically” correct, but morally correct and sensible. It doesn’t matter how much you THINK someone is guilty, they aren’t guilty until the verdict is rendered.
And it doesn’t matter how much you WANT Biden to be president so Kamala Harris can take over when his dog kills him, he ISN’T president until inauguration, and he isn’t president-elect until the electoral college, you know, ELECTS him.
Politifact obviously thinks that’s a petty fact, but who cares? It IS a fact and you can’t censor someone over it.
Or actually, they can censor someone over it and have been doing so repeatedly.
But not this time. That’s one. Step one.
We need a lot more steps.
Here’s her announcement about their plan to get them.
Who are you putting your money on to win this? https://t.co/cq2B2Mjdm2 pic.twitter.com/66hKPt9CHS — Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) November 6, 2020


therightscoop--2020-11-29--Please please PLEASE do this: MSM says Trump considering announcing 2024 run DURING Biden inaugurati

Please please PLEASE do this: MSM says Trump considering announcing 2024 run DURING Biden inauguration

President Trump ’ s supporters have been talking increasingly about his running again in 2024 , since it looks like the many legal challenges will not amount to reversing the media ’ s call for Biden in 2020 .
Never has there ever been a more appealing idea .
The Daily Wire , referring to reporting from Daily Beast : The conversations have explored , among other things , how Trump could best time his announcement so as to keep the Republican Party behind him for the next four years .
Two of these knowledgeable sources said the president has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even floated the idea of doing a 2024-related event during Biden ’ s inauguration week , possibly on Inauguration Day , if his legal effort to steal the 2020 election ultimately fails .
And there ’ s this , from Bloomberg .
A few days before National Security Advisor Robert O ’ Brien left for a high-profile tour of southeast Asia , President Donald Trump delivered some news to him , Secretary of State Michael Pompeo and Vice President Mike Pence in the Oval Office .
Trump planned to run for president again @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , if he couldn ’ t overturn his Nov. 3 defeat by Joe Biden .
“ If you do that — and I think I speak for everybody in the room — we ’ re with you 100 percent , ” O ’ Brien responded , according to two people briefed on the conversation .
Pompeo and Pence , who are both regarded as contenders for the 2024 Republican nomination , smiled but said nothing , the people said .
So this could be for real , y ’ all .
And buddy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think of a more worthwhile thing in the world that driving the liberal media up the wall that day .
They deserve to have their special moment rained on .
It ’ s just what I want for Christmas .
Oh and I liked this part too .
The Daily Beast also cited “ two sources with direct knowledge of the matter , ” claiming that the president “ has privately bragged that he ’ d still remain in the spotlight , even if Biden is in the Oval Office , in part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ covering him since — as Trump has assessed — he gets the news outlets ratings and those same outlets find Biden ‘ boring .
’ ”

President Trump’s supporters have been talking increasingly about his running again in 2024, since it looks like the many legal challenges will not amount to reversing the media’s call for Biden in 2020.
Never has there ever been a more appealing idea.
The Daily Wire, referring to reporting from Daily Beast:
The conversations have explored, among other things, how Trump could best time his announcement so as to keep the Republican Party behind him for the next four years. Two of these knowledgeable sources said the president has, in the past two weeks, even floated the idea of doing a 2024-related event during Biden’s inauguration week, possibly on Inauguration Day, if his legal effort to steal the 2020 election ultimately fails.
And there’s this, from Bloomberg.
A few days before National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien left for a high-profile tour of southeast Asia, President Donald Trump delivered some news to him, Secretary of State Michael Pompeo and Vice President Mike Pence in the Oval Office. Trump planned to run for president again in 2024, he told the men, if he couldn’t overturn his Nov. 3 defeat by Joe Biden. “If you do that — and I think I speak for everybody in the room — we’re with you 100 percent,” O’Brien responded, according to two people briefed on the conversation. Pompeo and Pence, who are both regarded as contenders for the 2024 Republican nomination, smiled but said nothing, the people said.
So this could be for real, y’all.
And buddy, I can’t hardly even think of a more worthwhile thing in the world that driving the liberal media up the wall that day. They deserve to have their special moment rained on. It’s just what I want for Christmas.
Oh and I liked this part too.
The Daily Beast also cited “two sources with direct knowledge of the matter,” claiming that the president “has privately bragged that he’d still remain in the spotlight, even if Biden is in the Oval Office, in part because the news media will keep regularly covering him since — as Trump has assessed — he gets the news outlets ratings and those same outlets find Biden ‘boring.’”
COUNT on that.


therightscoop--2020-11-29--NYC public elementary schools to OPEN – for the reasons the RIGHT has given ALL ALONG

Funny , isn ’ t it , how quickly people change their opinions or open their eyes after an election is over and the results have been “ called ” by the press for the Democrat ?
New York City is reopening the public elementary schools — a total different policy from the summer and even from just the last few weeks by Bill de Blasio — but nobody seems to notice the timing .
And de Blasio even made an insane-sounding explanation for it .
“ We now believe we know what we didn ’ t know back in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made fun of Donald Rumsfeld for over a decade for his “ known knowns , known unknowns , unknown unknowns ” thing ?
Yeah .
The press just can not , are pathologically incapable of , showing any consistency at all .
De Bozo also said that “ studies ” show young kids are not in much danger from Covid .
WELL GOSH WHO HAS BEEN SAYING THAT ?
Also he said that the elementary schools don ’ t pose much risk of causing outbreaks .
AGAIN WHO COULD EVER HAVE BEEN SAYING @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservatives and Trump supporters .
FOR MONTHS .
But go ahead and act like this is all perfectly normal and consistent , media .
Because Bill is a Democrat .
At LEAST the kids are going to be back in school .
Whatever else , that ’ s a good thing .
Another crazy thing from the de Blasio presser : Uh , yeah , NOT the takeaway , Bill .
Just ask Mac ’ s .
Anyway , there is reason to doubt how much Bill actually means it .
Like I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : we ’ ll see .

Funny, isn’t it, how quickly people change their opinions or open their eyes after an election is over and the results have been “called” by the press for the Democrat?
New York City is reopening the public elementary schools — a total different policy from the summer and even from just the last few weeks by Bill de Blasio — but nobody seems to notice the timing. And de Blasio even made an insane-sounding explanation for it.
“We now believe we know what we didn’t know back in the summer.” Remember when the press made fun of Donald Rumsfeld for over a decade for his “known knowns, known unknowns, unknown unknowns” thing? Yeah. The press just cannot, are pathologically incapable of, showing any consistency at all.
De Bozo also said that “studies” show young kids are not in much danger from Covid. WELL GOSH WHO HAS BEEN SAYING THAT? Also he said that the elementary schools don’t pose much risk of causing outbreaks. AGAIN WHO COULD EVER HAVE BEEN SAYING THAT?
Oh right. Republicans and conservatives and Trump supporters. FOR MONTHS.
But go ahead and act like this is all perfectly normal and consistent, media. Because Bill is a Democrat. At LEAST the kids are going to be back in school. Whatever else, that’s a good thing.
Another crazy thing from the de Blasio presser:
"I think that's what people learned from coronavirus, that government has such an important role to play…"-BdB. That is very much NOT what I learned from coronavirus. — Karol Markowicz (@karol) November 29, 2020
Uh, yeah, NOT the takeaway, Bill. Just ask Mac’s.
Anyway, there is reason to doubt how much Bill actually means it.
This is from the letter Schools Chancellor Carranza sent to teachers today. Why does he keep referring to "blended learning" if they are phasing out the blended model? The letter does not mention moving to a full-time model whatsoever. pic.twitter.com/60DeXPJgPh — Karol Markowicz (@karol) November 29, 2020
The "wherever possible" line makes me think I celebrated too early. It's really not possible in many places if they don't let go of social distance requirements. And, clearly, not enough staff to keep half-classes going. https://t.co/ynqLFMzSBG — Karol Markowicz (@karol) November 29, 2020
Like I tell y’all all the time: we’ll see.


therightscoop--2020-11-29--‘AUTONOMOUS ZONE’: NY Pub REFUSES to close, DEFIES license by making drinks FREE, and DARES Cuomo, D

‘AUTONOMOUS ZONE’: NY Pub REFUSES to close, DEFIES license by making drinks FREE, and DARES Cuomo, De Blasio to come stop them

Covid may have most bars and nightclubs locked down , but all year long we ’ ve seen protest movements ( from the left ) go unchecked and , more importantly , un-criticized by the media and the scientific community .
Since those elites obviously know better than us plebes , it ’ s only reasonable to conclude scientifically that there is a medical immunity to Covid imparted by the process of becoming a radical protester .
And so it is in that scientific tradition that Keith McAlarney has declared his Staten Island pub an “ autonomous zone.
” In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weekend , they took it even one step further .
Not only are they refusing to close , but after the gov ’ t retaliated by pulling their liquor license , they decided to GIVE THEIR FOOD AND DRINK AWAY FOR FREE .
“ Doesn ’ t seem like we can do business .
So here ’ s what we ’ re going to do for everybody .
We ’ re going to give everything away for free !
So now you can come to Mac ’ s Public House , and you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can drink for free .
We just ask that you do make a donation towards us so that we can still pay our bills.
” “ Keep sending your agencies , because they ’ re not allowed in , and we ’ re still gon na be here.
” Here ’ s more from the New York Post : It ’ s not a small step .
But , again , it ’ s definitely supported by MONTHS of data .
If news headlines and woke proclamations are data , and I think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they definitely are .
“ At this point , we ’ re OK with it , because we ’ re not paying it , ” the bar ’ s co-owner Danny Presti said according to the Post , in referring to the fines imposed as punishment .
He said the sheriff ’ s department is “ issuing us $ 1,000 fines , so they keep coming back .
We ’ re still here .
We ’ re not letting them in.
” “ We ’ re not backing down .
You think you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re saying I don ’ t have a license now to serve liquor now ?
Well guess what ?
That liquor license is on the wall .
If that liquor license is gon na come off the wall , it ’ s gon na be done by Cuomo .
You wan na come down here and pull that license off the wall ?
Or DeBozo , you wan na come down here and pull that license off the wall ?
Feel free to end up coming down and we ’ ll have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stepping foot on my property .
I will NOT back down.
” Awesome .
COME AND TAKE IT .
Guess what : you can ’ t trap the part of the population they don ’ t like indoors for months while allowing the part they do like to rampage through the streets .
Well they can ’ t do that and not expect open rebellion .
Sorry , libs and CNN .
Your plan isn ’ t working .
REAL Americans have business to do , church to attend , and schools to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the away .
That ’ s not advice .
It ’ s a warning .

Covid may have most bars and nightclubs locked down, but all year long we’ve seen protest movements (from the left) go unchecked and, more importantly, un-criticized by the media and the scientific community.
Since those elites obviously know better than us plebes, it’s only reasonable to conclude scientifically that there is a medical immunity to Covid imparted by the process of becoming a radical protester. And so it is in that scientific tradition that Keith McAlarney has declared his Staten Island pub an “autonomous zone.”
In a MUST WATCH YouTube video posted this weekend, they took it even one step further. Not only are they refusing to close, but after the gov’t retaliated by pulling their liquor license, they decided to GIVE THEIR FOOD AND DRINK AWAY FOR FREE.
“Doesn’t seem like we can do business. So here’s what we’re going to do for everybody. We’re going to give everything away for free! So now you can come to Mac’s Public House, and you can eat for free, and you can drink for free. We just ask that you do make a donation towards us so that we can still pay our bills.”
“Keep sending your agencies, because they’re not allowed in, and we’re still gonna be here.”
Here’s more from the New York Post:
“!ATTENTION! We hereby declare this establishment an !!!AUTONOMOUS ZONE!!!” read signs outside and around Mac’s Public House in Grant City, invoking a phrase more commonly associated with the monthlong occupation of Capitol Hill in the Emerald City by anti-cop radicals. “We refuse to abide by any rules and regulations put forth by the Mayor of NYC and Governor of NY State.”
It’s not a small step. But, again, it’s definitely supported by MONTHS of data. If news headlines and woke proclamations are data, and I think we all know in our CNN culture they definitely are.
Restrictions, including the prohibition of indoor dining in bars and restaurants, took effect Wednesday. But Mac’s balked, and defiantly kept its doors open — despite being slapped with thousands of dollars in fines, a shut-down order from the state Health Department and the Friday revocation of its liquor license by the State Liquor Authority, the owners said.
“At this point, we’re OK with it, because we’re not paying it,” the bar’s co-owner Danny Presti said according to the Post, in referring to the fines imposed as punishment. He said the sheriff’s department is “issuing us $1,000 fines, so they keep coming back. We’re still here. We’re not letting them in.”
“We’re not backing down. You think you scared me by the fact that you’re saying I don’t have a license now to serve liquor now? Well guess what? That liquor license is on the wall. If that liquor license is gonna come off the wall, it’s gonna be done by Cuomo. You wanna come down here and pull that license off the wall? Or DeBozo, you wanna come down here and pull that license off the wall? Feel free to end up coming down and we’ll have a conversation before you even think about stepping foot on my property. I will NOT back down.”
Awesome. COME AND TAKE IT.
Guess what: you can’t trap the part of the population they don’t like indoors for months while allowing the part they do like to rampage through the streets. Well they can’t do that and not expect open rebellion.
Sorry, libs and CNN. Your plan isn’t working. REAL Americans have business to do, church to attend, and schools to open. Comply our get out of the away. That’s not advice. It’s a warning.


therightscoop--2020-11-29--Former FBI Special Agent finds MASSIVE number of absentee votes from non-residents in Georgia

A former FBI Special Agent and trained federal investigator , Derek Somerville , has uncovered a massive number of people who voted absentee in Georgia in counties where they no longer live .
We ’ re talking well over 57k .
Here ’ s his analysis : Don ’ t think there are voter issues in Georgia ?
I have 57,793 reasons to reconsider that .
I ’ ve personally spent the last several days painstakingly analyzing 580,226 registered Georgia voters from current state-provided voter rolls who submitted a US Postal Service Mail Forwarding Change of Address request at least @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election .
FACT : at least 57,793 Georgia voters cast their vote in a county that is DIFFERENT than where they previously instructed the USPS to forward their mail .
FACT : 43,507 ( 75 % ) of these individuals DID NOT vote in person on election day .
FACT : 17,514 of these voters asked the USPS to forward their mail OUT OF STATE to non-APO/DPO/FPO military addresses .
89 % are over the age of 25 and likely not college students .
It ’ s been a few years , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a former FBI Special Agent .
Prior to that I worked in the US intelligence community .
I ’ m a trained federal investigator who was assigned to Public Corruption cases .
There are others more experienced than me , but this if far from my first rodeo .
With few exceptions , a person submits a USPS Change of Address request because they have permanently moved and want their mail rerouted to their new address .
Under the 1993 National Voter Registration Act ( NVRA ) , states may use that USPS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ registrants who may have changed residences ” and “ remove the registrant from the voter rolls after satisfying all requirements of the [ NVRA ] ” .
Many of these incidents can be legitimately explained .
Not all reveal nefarious intent or coordinated efforts .
Some voted Republican .
Some voted Democrat .
But after investigating a random sample of these voters , it ’ s abundantly clear that thousands , if not tens of thousands , voted in our election who do not reside in the county in which they voted…or even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 57,793 and , if warranted , remove their votes from the November 3rd general election and remove them from the voter rolls before the upcoming Senate run-off .

A former FBI Special Agent and trained federal investigator, Derek Somerville, has uncovered a massive number of people who voted absentee in Georgia in counties where they no longer live. We’re talking well over 57k. Here’s his analysis:
Don’t think there are voter issues in Georgia? I have 57,793 reasons to reconsider that. I’ve personally spent the last several days painstakingly analyzing 580,226 registered Georgia voters from current state-provided voter rolls who submitted a US Postal Service Mail Forwarding Change of Address request at least 30 days PRIOR TO the November 3rd election. FACT: at least 57,793 Georgia voters cast their vote in a county that is DIFFERENT than where they previously instructed the USPS to forward their mail. FACT: 43,507 (75%) of these individuals DID NOT vote in person on election day. FACT: 17,514 of these voters asked the USPS to forward their mail OUT OF STATE to non-APO/DPO/FPO military addresses. 89% are over the age of 25 and likely not college students. It’s been a few years, but most of you know I’m a former FBI Special Agent. Prior to that I worked in the US intelligence community. I’m a trained federal investigator who was assigned to Public Corruption cases. There are others more experienced than me, but this if far from my first rodeo. With few exceptions, a person submits a USPS Change of Address request because they have permanently moved and want their mail rerouted to their new address. Under the 1993 National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), states may use that USPS Change of Address request to “identify registrants who may have changed residences” and “remove the registrant from the voter rolls after satisfying all requirements of the [NVRA]”. Many of these incidents can be legitimately explained. Not all reveal nefarious intent or coordinated efforts. Some voted Republican. Some voted Democrat. But after investigating a random sample of these voters, it’s abundantly clear that thousands, if not tens of thousands, voted in our election who do not reside in the county in which they voted…or even in Georgia. Demand officials investigate these 57,793 and, if warranted, remove their votes from the November 3rd general election and remove them from the voter rolls before the upcoming Senate run-off. I have the list prepared. Specific examples forthcoming.
In fact Sommerville did post one record so far on his facebook as an example of what he’s talking about:
Here’s his explanation of this record:
1 example out of 57,793 questionable voters. We’ll call this voter ‘Jane’. Jane is currently registered to vote in Georgia. Jane requested her Georgia absentee ballot on June 29, 2020. It was issued to her on September 18, 2020 at a Georgia address. Jane returned her ballot via mail on October 24, 2020. And with that, Jane voted in our election. The only problem is Jane instructed the US Postal Service to begin forwarding her mail to Portland, Oregon effective February of 2017. And since May of 2016, ‘Jane’ has been employed as a Registered Nurse at a downtown Portland hospital. Jane conveniently has an apartment in downtown Portland too. In fact, this is the 4th apartment Jane has listed as her private residence since moving to Portland in late 2016 / early 2017.
Jane has a boyfriend in Portland. Jane teaches fitness classes at a local fitness center in Portland. Jane posts pictures of herself all over Portland on social media. Jane has been in Portland for 4 years and has set herself up with a nice life there. Good for Jane. But Jane DOES NOT LIVE IN GEORGIA.
Now, several of her family members still do live in Georgia. In fact, some at Jane’s old address. And you guessed it, 2 of them received their absentee ballots at that same Georgia address. Remarkably, despite living 2,600 miles away, somehow Jane managed to return her mail-in ballot to the county Registrar’s office ON THE SAME DAY as her 2 family members’ ballots. From Portland. 2,600 miles away. Think about that for a second. Jane no longer resides in Georgia and it appears her ballot was completed by someone else. Or maybe this is completely legitimate. Either way, this is why we have a Secretary of State’s office – to investigate and ensure the integrity of our elections. 1 example out of 57,793. I can do this all day long. More to come, including the file itself. Secure our vote. Secure our liberty.
This is the kind of investigation that needs to happen in an official capacity. And every freaking one of these people who committed voter fraud needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But I suspect it isn’t just individuals doing this on their own, especially for it to happen with this many votes.