therightscoop--2020-12-02--Conservative icon Walter Williams passes away at 84

It ’ s just been reported that conservative icon Walter Williams passed away last night at age 84 .
Reaction is pouring in : Wow , what a punch in the gut .
I am told that one of my heroes , Dr. Walter Williams , passed away .
Walter had an enormous influence on me , from the time I was 13-years old ; he was my first guest on Life , Liberty & Levin .
I 'll discuss more tonight on radio .
Very sad news .
Walter Williams was legendary .
He was brilliant , incisive , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up reading him , and he was a ferocious defender of free markets and a powerful explainer of the virtues of Liberty .
https : //t.co/DrwZo5yxqR It is true apparently .
Dr Walter Williams has passed .
One of our most beloved guest hosts .
Dear friend .
Patriot .
Teacher .
Defender of Liberty .
What a loss .
Heartbroken .
Born in poverty , raised by a single mother in the projects of North Philadelphia , a college drop-out , he overcame all types of adversity to become a nationally renowned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : //t.co/LKWo6ZMv4Z Williams was still writing columns as late as last month .
Here ’ s his latest column called “ Blacks of yesteryear and today ” : I was a teenager , growing up in the Richard Allen housing project of North Philadelphia , when Emmett Till was lynched in Money , Mississippi , on Aug. 28 , 1955 , and his brutalized , unrecognizable body later recovered from the Tallahatchie River .
From 1882-1968 , 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States .
Roughly 73 % , or 3,446 , were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or 1,297 , were white people .
Many whites were lynched because they were Republicans who supported their fellow Black citizens and opposed the lawless act of lynching .
Tuskegee University has the best documentation of lynching .
It records an 1892 high of 69 whites and 161 blacks lynched .
By the 1940s , occurrences of lynching fell to single digits or disappeared altogether .
At the time of my youth , today ’ s opportunities for socioeconomic advancement were nonexistent for Black people .
For all but a few , college @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of finances and racial discrimination .
If you were not admitted to the Black colleges of Lincoln University or Cheyney State College , forget about college .
I do not know of any student of my 1954 class at Philadelphia ’ s Benjamin Franklin High School who attended college .
Though the quality of education at Benjamin Franklin is a mere shadow of its past , today , roughly 17 % of its graduating class has been admitted to college .
The true hope for a youngster graduating from high school during the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
My first well-paying job was as a taxi driver for Yellow Cab Company .
Younger Black people today have no idea of and have not experienced the poverty and discrimination of earlier generations .
Also , the problems today ’ s Black people face have little or nothing to do with poverty and discrimination .
Political hustlers like to blame poverty and racism while ignoring the fact that poverty and racism were much greater yesteryear , but there was not nearly the same amount of chaos .
The out-of-wedlock birth rate among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Today , it is 75 % .
Black female-headed households were just 18 % of households in 1950 , as opposed to about 68 % today .
In fact , from 1890 to 1940 , the Black marriage rate was slightly higher than that of whites .
Even during slavery , when marriage was forbidden , most Black children lived in biological two-parent families .
In New York City , in 1925 , 85 % of Black households were two-parent households .
A study of 1880 family structure in Philadelphia shows that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There ’ s little protest against the horrible and dangerous conditions under which many poor and law-abiding Black people must live .
It is not uncommon for 50 Black people to be shot over a weekend in Chicago — not by policemen , but by other Black people .
About 7,300 Black people are murdered each year , and not by white people or racist cops , but mostly by other Black people .
These numbers almost make our history of victimization by racist lynching look like child ’ s play .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Black Americans face must come from within our Black communities .
They will not come from the political arena .
Blacks hold high offices and dominate the politics in cities such as Philadelphia , Detroit , Baltimore , Chicago , Washington , D.C. and New Orleans .
Yet , these are the very cities with the nation ’ s worst-performing schools , highest crime rates , high illegitimacy rates , weak family structure and other forms of social pathology I am not saying that Blacks having political power is the cause of these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the solution to most of the major problems that confront Black people will not be found in the political arena or by electing more Blacks to high office .
One important step is for Black Americans to stop being “ useful tools ” for the leftist , hate-America agenda .
Many Black problems are exacerbated by guilt-ridden white people .
Often , they accept behavior and standards from Black people that they would not begin to accept from white people .
In that sense , white liberal guilt is a form of disrespect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ By the same token , Black people should stop exploiting the guilt of whites .
Let us all keep in mind that history is one of those immutable facts of life .

It’s just been reported that conservative icon Walter Williams passed away last night at age 84. Reaction is pouring in:
Wow, what a punch in the gut. I am told that one of my heroes, Dr. Walter Williams, passed away. Walter had an enormous influence on me, from the time I was 13-years old; he was my first guest on Life, Liberty & Levin. I'll discuss more tonight on radio.
Very sad news. Walter Williams was legendary. He was brilliant, incisive, witty, and profound. I grew up reading him, and he was a ferocious defender of free markets and a powerful explainer of the virtues of Liberty. https://t.co/DrwZo5yxqR
It is true apparently. Dr Walter Williams has passed. One of our most beloved guest hosts. Dear friend. Patriot. Teacher. Defender of Liberty. What a loss. Heartbroken.
Born in poverty, raised by a single mother in the projects of North Philadelphia, a college drop-out, he overcame all types of adversity to become a nationally renowned professor, economist and columnist. https://t.co/LKWo6ZMv4Z
Williams was still writing columns as late as last month. Here’s his latest column called “Blacks of yesteryear and today”:
I was a teenager, growing up in the Richard Allen housing project of North Philadelphia, when Emmett Till was lynched in Money, Mississippi, on Aug. 28, 1955, and his brutalized, unrecognizable body later recovered from the Tallahatchie River.
From 1882-1968, 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States. Roughly 73%, or 3,446, were Black people, and 27%, or 1,297, were white people.
Many whites were lynched because they were Republicans who supported their fellow Black citizens and opposed the lawless act of lynching. Tuskegee University has the best documentation of lynching. It records an 1892 high of 69 whites and 161 blacks lynched. By the 1940s, occurrences of lynching fell to single digits or disappeared altogether.
At the time of my youth, today’s opportunities for socioeconomic advancement were nonexistent for Black people. For all but a few, college attendance was out of the question because of finances and racial discrimination.
If you were not admitted to the Black colleges of Lincoln University or Cheyney State College, forget about college. I do not know of any student of my 1954 class at Philadelphia’s Benjamin Franklin High School who attended college.
Though the quality of education at Benjamin Franklin is a mere shadow of its past, today, roughly 17% of its graduating class has been admitted to college. The true hope for a youngster graduating from high school during the 1950s was a well-paying and steady job. My first well-paying job was as a taxi driver for Yellow Cab Company.
Younger Black people today have no idea of and have not experienced the poverty and discrimination of earlier generations. Also, the problems today’s Black people face have little or nothing to do with poverty and discrimination.
Political hustlers like to blame poverty and racism while ignoring the fact that poverty and racism were much greater yesteryear, but there was not nearly the same amount of chaos.
The out-of-wedlock birth rate among Blacks in 1940 was about 11%. Today, it is 75%. Black female-headed households were just 18% of households in 1950, as opposed to about 68% today.
In fact, from 1890 to 1940, the Black marriage rate was slightly higher than that of whites. Even during slavery, when marriage was forbidden, most Black children lived in biological two-parent families.
In New York City, in 1925, 85% of Black households were two-parent households. A study of 1880 family structure in Philadelphia shows that three-quarters of Black families were two-parent households.
There’s little protest against the horrible and dangerous conditions under which many poor and law-abiding Black people must live. It is not uncommon for 50 Black people to be shot over a weekend in Chicago — not by policemen, but by other Black people.
About 7,300 Black people are murdered each year, and not by white people or racist cops, but mostly by other Black people. These numbers almost make our history of victimization by racist lynching look like child’s play.
The solutions to the many problems that Black Americans face must come from within our Black communities. They will not come from the political arena. Blacks hold high offices and dominate the politics in cities such as Philadelphia, Detroit, Baltimore, Chicago, Washington, D.C. and New Orleans. Yet, these are the very cities with the nation’s worst-performing schools, highest crime rates, high illegitimacy rates, weak family structure and other forms of social pathology
I am not saying that Blacks having political power is the cause of these problems. What I am saying is the solution to most of the major problems that confront Black people will not be found in the political arena or by electing more Blacks to high office.
One important step is for Black Americans to stop being “useful tools” for the leftist, hate-America agenda. Many Black problems are exacerbated by guilt-ridden white people. Often, they accept behavior and standards from Black people that they would not begin to accept from white people.
In that sense, white liberal guilt is a form of disrespect in their relationships with Black Americans. By the same token, Black people should stop exploiting the guilt of whites. Let us all keep in mind that history is one of those immutable facts of life.


therightscoop--2020-12-03--Lin Wood responds to ‘dishonest’ Breitbart attacks on his voting record

Lin Wood has responded to attacks from Breitbart that suggest he ’ s a partisan Democrat based on his voting @ @ @ @ @ Breitbart ’ s article noting that he ’ s donated to Richard Nixon , Gerald @ @ @ @ @ Herman Cain and more : Lin Wood also responded to Erick Erickson and Jordan Schachtel @ @ @ @ @ ’ s first tweet this morning made clear he ’ s not a Democrat nor @ @ @ @ @ American Patriot : Good enough for me .
But then I never was convinced he @ @ @ @

Lin Wood has responded to attacks from Breitbart that suggest he’s a partisan Democrat based on his voting record:
1. Breitbart is dishonest. Historically, I am nonpartisan. This year, I was partisan because I love @realDonaldTrump. I donated $375K to Trump PAC. @sendavidperdue solicited a $25K donation & I gave it to him. I gave $5,600 to @RepDougCollins & hosted a fundraiser for him. https://t.co/CuhZoI6V7K — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 3, 2020
2. I estimate that I have given WINRED $10K+ this year. I have donated several thousand dollars to other Republican candidates & $150K to conservative PAC for congressional candidates. — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 3, 2020
3. I gave $5,000 at a fundraiser in which @RichardGrenell spoke. That is all I can remember at the moment. How did Briebart miss these facts? Guess some people do not want the fraud in GA election to be discovered. I did not donate to. @BrianKempGA. Now back to my dessert. pic.twitter.com/QRR1HzR7bW — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 3, 2020
He also mocks Breitbart’s article noting that he’s donated to Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, Herman Cain and more:
Oh no!!! I thought Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, Bush 41, Bush 43, & Herman Cain were Republicans! Did they all lie to me or is @BreitbartNews lying to you? You choose. Choose wisely. https://t.co/7P1KzgsGmH — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 3, 2020
Lin Wood also responded to Erick Erickson and Jordan Schachtel:
Hey, Erick, do your homework. Every GA voter who voted in person in early voting is recorded by @GaSecofState as having voted by absentee ballot. I voted IN PERSON in early voting in 2016 & 2020. I voted for @realDonaldTrump. Attack if you wish, but do so with truth, not lies. https://t.co/U6WSzdqyKw — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 3, 2020
Check the facts, @JordanSchachtel. I supported @ToddMcMurtry in race against Massie. I was clear I did not know Massie but knew Todd as my co-counsel in @N1ckSandmann cases. I felt strongly that Todd was a man of integrity who would be good for Kentucky & @realDonaldTrump. https://t.co/u0CFDY8ZvI — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 3, 2020
Lastly, Lin Wood’s first tweet this morning made clear he’s not a Democrat nor a Republican, but an American Patriot:
Good morning. Today is a good day to make clear that I agree 100% with @EmeraldRobinson. I am not Democrat. I am not Republican. I am an American Patriot who believes it is essential to our freedom that @realDonaldTrump victory be recognized & fraud in voting system be fixed. https://t.co/dIc7gvCqHj — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 3, 2020
Good enough for me. But then I never was convinced he was a secret Democrat…


therightscoop--2020-12-03--Daily Beast gets HAMMERED for falsely tying COVID to the death of Gov Kristi Noem’s grandmother

The Daily Beast hit a new low today when they falsely tied COVID to the death of Governor Kristi Noem ’ s grandmother , who didn ’ t have COVID and didn ’ t die from COVID : FOX NEWS – An article published this week by The Daily Beast has been widely criticized for seeming to blame South Dakota Gov .
Kristi Noem for the death of her own grandmother .
On Nov. 22 , Noem announced on Facebook that “ we lost my grandma today.
” Arlys Arnold , who was 98 , was finally laid to rest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Estelline Nursing & Care Center , which according to a report from the South Dakota-based outlet Keloland News had been suffering a big uptick in coronavirus cases and deaths among its residents .
Arnold herself had tested negative .
However , despite how Arnold ’ s death had nothing to do with the coronavirus , Daily Beast special correspondent Michael Daly heavily implied in the piece that her passing was the result of Noem ’ s coronavirus policies .
His story carried the bold headline , “ Anti-Mask Guv ’ s Grandmother @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” “ And yet Kristi Noem continues to downplay the virus , refuse a mask mandate , and ignore the terrible price her state is paying , ” Daly ’ s subheadline read .
Daly noted at the top of his piece that Arnold was “ among 13 to die over a two-week period at a top-rated nursing home swept by COVID-19 , ” and even acknowledged her negative COVID test , but stressed that “ the other 12 of the 13 deaths between Nov. 14 and Nov. 28 at the Estelline Nursing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ . '
” “ The number makes clear the lunacy of Noem ’ s downplaying of the pandemic and her continued refusal to impose a statewide mask mandate , ” Daly wrote , later accusing the governor of being “ fixated on livelihoods rather than lives , ” and shaming the Republican for not publicly expressing condolences for the other 12 people who died at the nursing home .
“ For Noem to have mentioned the dozen other dead would have raised the specter of the virus that killed them even as she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brought it under control by invoking personal responsibility rather than mandating a vital precaution — a face mask — that is as simple and unimposing as wearing a seatbelt , ” Daly argued .

The Daily Beast hit a new low today when they falsely tied COVID to the death of Governor Kristi Noem’s grandmother, who didn’t have COVID and didn’t die from COVID:
FOX NEWS – An article published this week by The Daily Beast has been widely criticized for seeming to blame South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem for the death of her own grandmother.
On Nov. 22, Noem announced on Facebook that “we lost my grandma today.” Arlys Arnold, who was 98, was finally laid to rest Monday.
Arnold was a resident at the Estelline Nursing & Care Center, which according to a report from the South Dakota-based outlet Keloland News had been suffering a big uptick in coronavirus cases and deaths among its residents. Arnold herself had tested negative.
However, despite how Arnold’s death had nothing to do with the coronavirus, Daily Beast special correspondent Michael Daly heavily implied in the piece that her passing was the result of Noem’s coronavirus policies. His story carried the bold headline, “Anti-Mask Guv’s Grandmother Died in Nursing Home Ravaged by COVID.”
“And yet Kristi Noem continues to downplay the virus, refuse a mask mandate, and ignore the terrible price her state is paying,” Daly’s subheadline read.
Daly noted at the top of his piece that Arnold was “among 13 to die over a two-week period at a top-rated nursing home swept by COVID-19,” and even acknowledged her negative COVID test, but stressed that “the other 12 of the 13 deaths between Nov. 14 and Nov. 28 at the Estelline Nursing Home are described … as ‘COVID-related.'”
“The number makes clear the lunacy of Noem’s downplaying of the pandemic and her continued refusal to impose a statewide mask mandate,” Daly wrote, later accusing the governor of being “fixated on livelihoods rather than lives,” and shaming the Republican for not publicly expressing condolences for the other 12 people who died at the nursing home.
“For Noem to have mentioned the dozen other dead would have raised the specter of the virus that killed them even as she was continuing to claim that she had brought it under control by invoking personal responsibility rather than mandating a vital precaution — a face mask — that is as simple and unimposing as wearing a seatbelt,” Daly argued.


therightscoop--2020-12-04--WATCH: Tucker Carlson rips into Senator Mike Lee for giving away high tech jobs to foreigners

Yesterday the Senate passed a bill amended by Mike Lee by unanimous consent that Tucker Carlson says gives away high @ @ @ @ @ According to Tucker , the bill gets rid of the caps on how many immigrants @ @ @ @ @ country .
Which means , of course , that big tech companies will be able @ @ @ @ @ high tech jobs than American citizens .
As his segment continued , Tucker also went @ @ @ @ @ issue as well : There ’ s a lot of people on the right upset @ @ @ @ @ even senators like Josh Hawley could stand by and let this pass without objection :

Yesterday the Senate passed a bill amended by Mike Lee by unanimous consent that Tucker Carlson says gives away high tech jobs to foreigners:
Tonight, @TuckerCarlson goes after Senate @SenMikeLee & @kevincramer for passing an immigration bill lobbied by Big Tech – “Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act”. The bill was passed without any public hearings, & will reward Big Tech’s appetite for cheap indentured labor. pic.twitter.com/6kxQ8BwnBq — U.S. Tech Workers (@USTechWorkers) December 4, 2020
According to Tucker, the bill gets rid of the caps on how many immigrants can come from a single country. Which means, of course, that big tech companies will be able to hire more immigrants for high tech jobs than American citizens.
As his segment continued, Tucker also went after Kevin Cramer on this issue as well:
Senator @kevincramer only cares about the interests of Big Tech executives. Companies like Microsoft love the H-1B visa because it provides them with indentured labor that will work for less than market wages in exchange for Green Cards. American workers are negatively impacted pic.twitter.com/MNE94dmTJN — U.S. Tech Workers (@USTechWorkers) December 4, 2020
There’s a lot of people on the right upset about this, wondering how even senators like Josh Hawley could stand by and let this pass without objection:
.@HawleyMO spends time working to stop YouTube from automatically playing then next video, but stands by as Mike Lee rewards big tech. What a joke. https://t.co/nzhHwXtIir — Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) December 2, 2020


therightscoop--2020-12-04--BREAKING: Republican lawmakers ask Supreme Court to stop Pennsylvania from certifying election resul

BREAKING: Republican lawmakers ask Supreme Court to stop Pennsylvania from certifying election results

Republican lawmakers , lead by Rep. Mike Kelly from Pennsylvania , has petitioned the Supreme Court to stop Pennsylvania from certifying their election results : This is the case we ’ ve been reporting on regarding the Pennsylvania legislature writing an unconstitutional 2019 law expanding mail-in balloting , and the one that Ted Cruz asked the high court to take up .
Justice Alito , who is responsible for Pennsylvania , did not just dismiss the lawsuit .
Rather he asked Pennsylvania officials to respond by next Wednesday : But Mazie , who reported this a few minutes ago , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which states must confirm results to make them “ conclusive ” ) is Dec. 8 ” and that the “ electoral college votes on Dec. 14.
” In other words , he says that “ by the time Kelly files final brief on Dec. 10 or so , the challenge will be moot.
” I reached out to Ed Morrissey , who knows a lot more about this than I do , and he says that he agrees with Mazie ’ s analysis .
So I guess we ’ ll wait to see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expected .

Republican lawmakers, lead by Rep. Mike Kelly from Pennsylvania, has petitioned the Supreme Court to stop Pennsylvania from certifying their election results:
NEW: Trump election challenge now at SCOTUS. Pennsylvania state representative challenges election results in his state, saying it was illegal for state legislature to expand mail-in voting late last year. pic.twitter.com/hVra2LJLvP — Steven Mazie (@stevenmazie) December 4, 2020
This is the case we’ve been reporting on regarding the Pennsylvania legislature writing an unconstitutional 2019 law expanding mail-in balloting, and the one that Ted Cruz asked the high court to take up.
Justice Alito, who is responsible for Pennsylvania, did not just dismiss the lawsuit. Rather he asked Pennsylvania officials to respond by next Wednesday:
The application goes to Justice Alito, who is assigned to handle such requests from this region of the country. He told Pennsylvania officials tonight to respond to the lawsuit in writing by December 9. — Steven Mazie (@stevenmazie) December 4, 2020
But Mazie, who reported this a few minutes ago, says the “safe-harbor deadline (by which states must confirm results to make them “conclusive”) is Dec. 8” and that the “electoral college votes on Dec. 14.” In other words, he says that “by the time Kelly files final brief on Dec. 10 or so, the challenge will be moot.”
Six days from now is an eternity on the electoral clock: Safe-harbor deadline (by which states must confirm results to make them “conclusive”) is Dec. 8, electoral college votes on Dec. 14. By the time Kelly files final brief on Dec. 10 or so, the challenge will be moot. — Steven Mazie (@stevenmazie) December 4, 2020
I reached out to Ed Morrissey, who knows a lot more about this than I do, and he says that he agrees with Mazie’s analysis. So I guess we’ll wait to see if something different happens other than the expected.
UPDATE: As I’ve been looking into this, I think what’s missing here is that the ultimate remedy here isn’t expected from the Supreme Court. The lawsuit is asking the Supreme Court to rule the law unconstitutional. If that happens, the remedy may go to Congress who has to ultimately accept (or dispute) the electoral votes for each state. Also, a ruling like this from the Supreme Court would have further implications in 2024 as well. As we all agree, even if Biden prevails in this election, this mail-in balloting fiasco has to be fixed if anyone will ever have confidence in it again.


therightscoop--2020-12-04--WATCH: O’Keefe catches CNN discussing how Trump is a ‘sociopath’, Rudy Giuliani as a ‘useful idiot’

O ’ Keefe has been putting out more recordings from CNN ’ s morning call , and here ’ s @ @ @ @ @ trashing Rudy Giuliani and one of his people calling Trump a ‘ sociopath ’ : @ @ @ @ @ attacking Giuliani , that ’ s back in October , just two days after the @ @ @ @ @ Hunter Biden .
When ‘ Carl ’ was attacking Trump as a ‘ sociopath ’ @ @ @ @ @ that ’ s from just over a week ago .
Here ’ s a few @ @ @ @ @ Keefe has released today ( and one last night ) :

O’Keefe has been putting out more recordings from CNN’s morning call, and here’s one that showcases Jeff Zucker trashing Rudy Giuliani and one of his people calling Trump a ‘sociopath’:
Note that when Zucker is attacking Giuliani, that’s back in October, just two days after the blockbuster story came out on Hunter Biden. When ‘Carl’ was attacking Trump as a ‘sociopath’, with Zucker agreeing, that’s from just over a week ago.
Their Trump hatred on full display.
Here’s a few other audios that O’Keefe has released today (and one last night):


therightscoop--2020-12-03--LOOK AT THEM: It’s not that they don’t try to HIDE it anymore, the MSM openly BRAGS about their pro-

LOOK AT THEM: It’s not that they don’t try to HIDE it anymore, the MSM openly BRAGS about their pro-Democrat bias.

The media make no effort to hide who and what they are anymore .
That ’ s what we ’ @ @ @ @ @ years and it was true in 2016 and it ’ s true today .
But @ @ @ @ @ more than that : they are PROUD of their bias , they VIRTUE SIGNAL it @ @ @ @ @ praise them on social media and in stupid celebrity videos .
Just look at THIS @ @ @ @ @ Just OUT in the open .
The public has short memories .
That ’ s @ @ @ @ @ it .
It ’ s just so frustrating to see this every day and there @ @ @ @ @ .

The media make no effort to hide who and what they are anymore. That’s what we’ve all been saying for years and it was true in 2016 and it’s true today. But today it’s even more than that: they are PROUD of their bias, they VIRTUE SIGNAL it so the progressive left will praise them on social media and in stupid celebrity videos.
Just look at THIS:
The Post is asking every Republican member of Congress the same three questions today. We will report back their answers. The questions are: pic.twitter.com/P1ptrZU4cr — The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) December 3, 2020
Y’all. Just OUT in the open.
Did these clowns ask Hillary these questions in 2016 when she created a conspiracy theory that Russia rigged our election? https://t.co/de7M8DV2Ga — Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug) December 3, 2020
SERIOUSLY.
Don't recall you asking Democrats similar questions in 2016. https://t.co/Mgs0VQ94L7 — Angus T. Kirk (@angusparvo) December 3, 2020
This would have been great content four years ago. What took you so long? — Aldous Huxley's Ghost™ (@AF632) December 3, 2020
I wanted Democrats and the media to answer these same questions about Trump for the last four years but no one asked. https://t.co/MXAloubW2I — Mike LaChance (@MikeLaChance33) December 3, 2020
I think I might have missed you asking this of Dems in 2016? Would someone be so kind as to link the questions as well as answers from 2016 for me? — Cheesetrader (@cheesetrader1) December 3, 2020
The public has short memories. That’s how they get away with it.
Dems started working to have him be a one-term president on 1/20, but no one denied he was president. — Laurie Willhalm (@lwillhalm) December 3, 2020
REVISION.
It’s just so frustrating to see this every day and there’s never a reckoning.


therightscoop--2020-12-03--WATCH: Video footage shows suitcases filled with ballots emerge in Georgia after poll workers told t

WATCH: Video footage shows suitcases filled with ballots emerge in Georgia after poll workers told to leave the room!

Video footage has emerged showing suitcases filled with ballots being pulled out from underneath a covered table in Georgia after poll workers were told to leave the room .
In the first video , according to the person detailing what ’ s in the video , the lady with the blond braids tells everyone they are going to stop counting and to go home .
It ’ s around 10:30 PM on November 3rd : After the poll workers leave , that ’ s when all of these suitcases full of ballots are pulled from underneath a covered table : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the woman with the blond braids put that table there at 8am in the morning .
And now that nearly everyone has left , out come the suitcases full of ballots from underneath that same table .
If this isn ’ t exactly what Trump has been talking about , then I don ’ t know what else it could be .
I ’ m sure liberals out there will try to explain this away , but this appears to be proof of voter fraud .
Why else would these suitcase full of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ table in the first place ?

Video footage has emerged showing suitcases filled with ballots being pulled out from underneath a covered table in Georgia after poll workers were told to leave the room.
In the first video, according to the person detailing what’s in the video, the lady with the blond braids tells everyone they are going to stop counting and to go home. It’s around 10:30 PM on November 3rd:
After the poll workers leave, that’s when all of these suitcases full of ballots are pulled from underneath a covered table:
The person narrating the videos said that the woman with the blond braids put that table there at 8am in the morning. And now that nearly everyone has left, out come the suitcases full of ballots from underneath that same table.
If this isn’t exactly what Trump has been talking about, then I don’t know what else it could be. I’m sure liberals out there will try to explain this away, but this appears to be proof of voter fraud. Why else would these suitcase full of ballots have been secretly put underneath this table in the first place?
UPDATE: Apparently the Secretary of State has already investigated this footage and they say this is just normal ballot processing and there’s nothing going on here illegal.
The 90 second video of election workers at State Farm arena, purporting to show fraud was watched in its entirety (hours) by @GaSecofState investigators. Shows normal ballot processing. Here is the fact check on it. https://t.co/HVJsvDjDvi — Gabriel Sterling (@GabrielSterling) December 4, 2020
In the fact check it says these weren’t suitcases, but regular ballot containers, and that Republican observers were in the room the entire time.


therightscoop--2020-12-03--Restaurant owner interrupts reporter on live TV, unloads own Michigan’s unfair lockdown policies

A restaurant owner in Michigan is fed up with the selective COVID lockdowns and is fighting back against them .
Here he is interrupting a reporter during a live news hit to make his voice heard : An angry business owner interrupted me moments before my live hit .
He wanted to express his anger about Michigan ’ s current covid-19 restrictions .
So , ok kool you can express your anger , just know I ’ m asking hard questions in return.💪🏾Journalism 101 always be ready !
pic.twitter.com/TIcJRv8R4J Bar and restaurant owners say they are feeling the effects of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Health and Human Services passed an epidemic order , which was set to expire on Dec. 9 .
Dave Morris , the owner of D & R Daily Grind , said he is tired of restrictions putting businesses like his in danger of closing .
He said since opening up for indoor dining on Nov. 27 , 2020 , he had seen a record number of customers and he was encouraging other business owners to open up .
Morris explaining loud , clear and live during the News Channel 3 newscast , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ robbing restaurant owners .
“ They have put me in a position to where I have to fight back , ” Morris said .
Morris has been going against the state ’ s indoor dining ban by opening up and welcoming customers .
The Michigan Restaurant and Lodging Associations filed a lawsuit to stop the order , but a federal judge ruled on Dec. 2 , 2020 , that restaurants can ’ t open safely and successfully .
“ I feel everybody should stand up , ” Morris said .
His café has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the indoor dining ban is in effect until Dec. 9 .
Morris says he received a cease-and-desist letter from Kalamazoo County health department , but he said business was booming so he would be staying open .
“ They want me to go down and be quiet and never hear from me again .
I am not going to put up with it .
It ’ s time to rise up .
Shut it all down or don ’ t shut any of us down .
That ’ s the only way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Morris said .
Businesses that defy the state ’ s orders face a fine of $ 1,000 a day .
Morris was was up to $ 6,000 as of Dec. 2 .
The indoor dining ban was set to expire Dec. 9 , but as COVID-19 cases continued to rise , it was unclear what would happen next .

A restaurant owner in Michigan is fed up with the selective COVID lockdowns and is fighting back against them. Here he is interrupting a reporter during a live news hit to make his voice heard:
An angry business owner interrupted me moments before my live hit. He wanted to express his anger about Michigan’s current covid-19 restrictions. So, ok kool you can express your anger, just know I’m asking hard questions in return.💪🏾Journalism 101 always be ready! pic.twitter.com/TIcJRv8R4J
Here’s more from WWMT:
Bar and restaurant owners say they are feeling the effects of the dine-in ban after the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services passed an epidemic order, which was set to expire on Dec. 9.
Dave Morris, the owner of D&R Daily Grind, said he is tired of restrictions putting businesses like his in danger of closing.
“My government leaders have abandoned me,” Morris said.
He said since opening up for indoor dining on Nov. 27, 2020, he had seen a record number of customers and he was encouraging other business owners to open up.
Morris explaining loud, clear and live during the News Channel 3 newscast, why he believes the epidemic orders are robbing restaurant owners.
“They have put me in a position to where I have to fight back,” Morris said.
Morris has been going against the state’s indoor dining ban by opening up and welcoming customers.
The Michigan Restaurant and Lodging Associations filed a lawsuit to stop the order, but a federal judge ruled on Dec. 2, 2020, that restaurants can’t open safely and successfully.
“I feel everybody should stand up,” Morris said.
His café has been open since Friday, Nov. 27, the indoor dining ban is in effect until Dec. 9.
Morris says he received a cease-and-desist letter from Kalamazoo County health department, but he said business was booming so he would be staying open.
“They want me to go down and be quiet and never hear from me again. I am not going to put up with it. It’s time to rise up. Shut it all down or don’t shut any of us down. That’s the only way to get control of a virus,” Morris said.
Businesses that defy the state’s orders face a fine of $1,000 a day. Morris was was up to $6,000 as of Dec. 2.
The indoor dining ban was set to expire Dec. 9, but as COVID-19 cases continued to rise, it was unclear what would happen next.


therightscoop--2020-12-03--BREAKING: Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to hear Trump’s case

Unfortunately the Wisconsin Supreme Court has refused to hear Trump ’ s case , saying it needs to go through the lower courts first : KCBS RADIO – The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Thursday refused to hear President Donald Trump ’ s lawsuit attempting to overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the battleground state , saying the case must first wind its way through lower courts .
Trump had asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to disqualify more than 221,000 ballots in the state ’ s two biggest Democratic counties , alleging irregularities in the way absentee ballots were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were earlier rejected by election officials in those counties during a recount that barely affected Biden ’ s winning margin of about 20,700 votes .
Trump had wanted the conservative-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case directly , saying there wasn ’ t enough time to wage the legal battle by starting first with a lower court given the looming Dec. 14 date when presidential electors cast their votes .
But attorneys for Gov .
Tony Evers and the state Department of Justice argued the law required the lawsuit to start with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against Trump , with swing Justice Brian Hagedorn joining three liberal justices in denying the petition .
The order said Trump can file in circuit court .
It was not immediately known if Trump would still pursue the case through lower courts .
His campaign spokeswoman did not immediately return a message seeking comment .
Trump filed a similar lawsuit in federal court on Wednesday .

Unfortunately the Wisconsin Supreme Court has refused to hear Trump’s case, saying it needs to go through the lower courts first:
KCBS RADIO – The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Thursday refused to hear President Donald Trump’s lawsuit attempting to overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the battleground state, saying the case must first wind its way through lower courts.
Trump had asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to disqualify more than 221,000 ballots in the state’s two biggest Democratic counties, alleging irregularities in the way absentee ballots were administered. His lawsuit echoed claims that were earlier rejected by election officials in those counties during a recount that barely affected Biden’s winning margin of about 20,700 votes.
Trump had wanted the conservative-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case directly, saying there wasn’t enough time to wage the legal battle by starting first with a lower court given the looming Dec. 14 date when presidential electors cast their votes. But attorneys for Gov. Tony Evers and the state Department of Justice argued the law required the lawsuit to start with lower courts.
The court ruled 4-3 against Trump, with swing Justice Brian Hagedorn joining three liberal justices in denying the petition. The order said Trump can file in circuit court.
It was not immediately known if Trump would still pursue the case through lower courts. His campaign spokeswoman did not immediately return a message seeking comment. Trump filed a similar lawsuit in federal court on Wednesday.


therightscoop--2020-12-03--Ted Cruz calls Lin Wood a clown, says he’s trying to MISLEAD the people of Georgia

Yesterday we told you about Lin Wood telling people not to vote for Loeffler and Perdue next month if they don ’ t come out and demand that Kemp call a special session of the legislature to fix the election fraud issues we ’ ve seen since November 3rd : Ted Cruz just responded to this video , calling Lin Wood a clown for saying this : “ I don ’ t know who this clown is , but anyone saying America would be better off w/ Chuck Schumer as Majority Leader—producing huge tax increases , the Green New Deal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court destroying the Bill of Rights—is trying to mislead the people of Georgia.
” I said in my post yesterday that I disagreed with Lin Wood on this because , as Cruz so deftly points out , there is a lot at stake if we don ’ t vote for Loeffler and Perdue .
But I also noted that I didn ’ t think Lin Wood was trying to mislead people , but making a political argument for fixing the election fraud that seems paramount after the recent election .
Lin Wood has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ others by saying “ I want ALL registered voters in GA to vote .
But I want ALL votes to be cast in a lawful & honest election .
I make no apology to those offended by those simple truths.
” I don ’ t disagree with Lin Wood here about lawful and honest elections , but I wouldn ’ t make this a red line on whether to vote for Loeffler and Perdue .
We need them in the Senate .

Yesterday we told you about Lin Wood telling people not to vote for Loeffler and Perdue next month if they don’t come out and demand that Kemp call a special session of the legislature to fix the election fraud issues we’ve seen since November 3rd:
Here's Lin Wood telling Georgia Republicans NOT to vote for Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue next month. "They have not earned your vote. Don't you give it to them. Why would you go back and vote in another rigged election for god's sake! Fix it! You gotta fix it!" pic.twitter.com/Uvj1QIpqFL — Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) December 2, 2020
Ted Cruz just responded to this video, calling Lin Wood a clown for saying this:
“I don’t know who this clown is, but anyone saying America would be better off w/ Chuck Schumer as Majority Leader—producing huge tax increases, the Green New Deal, massive amnesty & a packed Supreme Court destroying the Bill of Rights—is trying to mislead the people of Georgia.”
I don’t know who this clown is, but anyone saying America would be better off w/ Chuck Schumer as Majority Leader—producing huge tax increases, the Green New Deal, massive amnesty & a packed Supreme Court destroying the Bill of Rights—is trying to mislead the people of Georgia. https://t.co/jtEPT2UtzF — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) December 3, 2020
I said in my post yesterday that I disagreed with Lin Wood on this because, as Cruz so deftly points out, there is a lot at stake if we don’t vote for Loeffler and Perdue. But I also noted that I didn’t think Lin Wood was trying to mislead people, but making a political argument for fixing the election fraud that seems paramount after the recent election.
Lin Wood has responded to the sentiment from Cruz and others by saying “I want ALL registered voters in GA to vote. But I want ALL votes to be cast in a lawful & honest election. I make no apology to those offended by those simple truths.”
I want ALL registered voters in GA to vote. But I want ALL votes to be cast in a lawful & honest election. I make no apology to those offended by those simple truths. pic.twitter.com/4Ewf5IyQJj — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 3, 2020
I don’t disagree with Lin Wood here about lawful and honest elections, but I wouldn’t make this a red line on whether to vote for Loeffler and Perdue. We need them in the Senate.


therightscoop--2020-12-03--HUGE: Supreme Court overturns lower court ruling in big win for California churches!

In a huge victory for churches in California , the Supreme Court overturned a September ruling today which upheld California ’ s COVID policies that severely restricted church attendance during the pandemic : BAKERSFIELD – The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered a lower federal court to reexamine California restrictions on indoor religious services in areas hard hit by the coronavirus in light of the justices ’ recent ruling in favor of churches and synagogues in New York .
The high court ’ s unsigned order , with no noted dissent , leaves the California restrictions in place for now .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ court ruling that rejected a challenge to the limits from Pasadena-based Harvest Rock Church and Harvest International Ministry , which has more than 160 churches across the state .
Last week , the Supreme Court split 5-4 in holding that New York could not enforce certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues .
With a sharp increase in coronavirus cases in recent weeks , California Gov .
Gavin Newsom has put most of the state under heightened restrictions , which include a ban on indoor singing and chanting .
The application for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and by her referred to the Court , is treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment , and the petition is granted .
The September 2 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California is vacated , and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to remand to the District Court for further consideration in light of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo , 592 U. S. ___ ( 2020 ) .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t signed and had not dissent .
But the Supreme Court clearly instructed the lower court to rule based on their prior ruling that denied New York Governor Andrew Cuomo the ability to set limits on church capacities , saying he ’ d violated their first amendment rights to free speech .
If this lower court insists on not following the Supreme Court ’ s Cuomo ruling , then you can be sure the high court will end up ruling in favor of the churches on its own .

In a huge victory for churches in California, the Supreme Court overturned a September ruling today which upheld California’s COVID policies that severely restricted church attendance during the pandemic:
BAKERSFIELD – The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered a lower federal court to reexamine California restrictions on indoor religious services in areas hard hit by the coronavirus in light of the justices’ recent ruling in favor of churches and synagogues in New York. The high court’s unsigned order, with no noted dissent, leaves the California restrictions in place for now. But it throws out a federal district court ruling that rejected a challenge to the limits from Pasadena-based Harvest Rock Church and Harvest International Ministry, which has more than 160 churches across the state. Last week, the Supreme Court split 5-4 in holding that New York could not enforce certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues. With a sharp increase in coronavirus cases in recent weeks, California Gov. Gavin Newsom has put most of the state under heightened restrictions, which include a ban on indoor singing and chanting.
Here’s the actual SCOTUS ruling:
The application for injunctive relief, presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court, is treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment, and the petition is granted. The September 2 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to remand to the District Court for further consideration in light of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 592 U. S. ___ (2020).
As the AP noted, the order wasn’t signed and had not dissent. But the Supreme Court clearly instructed the lower court to rule based on their prior ruling that denied New York Governor Andrew Cuomo the ability to set limits on church capacities, saying he’d violated their first amendment rights to free speech.
If this lower court insists on not following the Supreme Court’s Cuomo ruling, then you can be sure the high court will end up ruling in favor of the churches on its own.


therightscoop--2020-12-03--President Trump calls out Republican Senators for not wanting to include a repeal of Section 230 in

President Trump calls out Republican Senators for not wanting to include a repeal of Section 230 in NDAA

A couple days ago President Trump took to Twitter to enunciate his demand that a full repeal of Section 230 be included in the National Defense Authorization Act ( NDAA ) or else he would be forced to veto it : We ’ ve all seen how Big Tech companies are unfairly using their platforms to target Trump and Republicans and to influence people to vote for Democrats , so I don ’ t blame Trump one bit for demanding that 230 be repealed .
The NDAA must be passed and this is a good opportunity for Trump to fight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some Republican Senators are getting cold feet and today Trump took to Twitter to call them out and to double down on this veto threat : According to Axios , here ’ s what is going on behind the scenes and why Trump sent the above tweet a few minutes ago : Sen. Jim Inhofe ( R-Okla. ) told President Trump on Wednesday he ’ ll likely fail to get two big wishes in pending defense spending legislation , bellowing into his cellphone : “ This is the only chance to get our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ overheard part of their conversation tells Axios .
Republicans are ready to test whether Trump ’ s threats of vetoing the bill , which has passed every year for more than half a century , are empty .
Inhofe leveled with Trump — over speakerphone while walking through the Senate ’ s Russell Building — that the bill won ’ t meet his demand to repeal liability protections for tech companies , or block efforts to re-title military bases named for Confederate figures .
The White House declined to comment .
Inhofe ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ request for comment .
Inhofe , who is leading negotiations on the National Defense Authorization Act as chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee , addressed “ Mr .
President ” before making his “ only chance ” comment during a midday call .
The source could not help but overhear the conversation due to the speakerphone ’ s volume .
Many Republican lawmakers tell Axios that while the tech liability element , Section 230 , needs to be reformed , it doesn ’ t make sense to tie unrelated language to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Wednesday , but said the provision “ has nothing to do with the military.
” “ You can ’ t do it in this bill , ” Inhofe said , adding that he has relayed this to Trump .
Many also believe they have the votes to override a presidential veto , if necessary .
Rep. Adam Kinzinger ( R-Ill. ) quote tweeted Trump ’ s veto threats earlier today and wrote : “ I will vote to override .
Because it ’ s really not about you.
” Members from both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ passed so they can move onto a government spending bill , due by Dec. 11 , and delivering coronavirus relief .
It actually makes more sense politically to tie a repeal of Section 230 to the NDAA than to a bill delivering coronavirus relief .
Can you imagine the outrage over that ?
It ’ s not about the subject of the bill , per se , but the fact that they must pass the bill .
This is why Trump is fighting so hard to get this repeal in this bill .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ day one of two things will happen .
Republicans won ’ t repeal Section 230 and thus Trump will eventually fold , or Trump will veto the bill and Congress will override his veto .
Last year ’ s NDAA passed the Senate with 86 votes and the House with 377 votes .

A couple days ago President Trump took to Twitter to enunciate his demand that a full repeal of Section 230 be included in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) or else he would be forced to veto it:
Section 230, which is a liability shielding gift from the U.S. to “Big Tech” (the only companies in America that have it – corporate welfare!), is a serious threat to our National Security & Election Integrity. Our Country can never be safe & secure if we allow it to stand….. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 2, 2020
…..Therefore, if the very dangerous & unfair Section 230 is not completely terminated as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), I will be forced to unequivocally VETO the Bill when sent to the very beautiful Resolute desk. Take back America NOW. Thank you! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 2, 2020
We’ve all seen how Big Tech companies are unfairly using their platforms to target Trump and Republicans and to influence people to vote for Democrats, so I don’t blame Trump one bit for demanding that 230 be repealed. The NDAA must be passed and this is a good opportunity for Trump to fight to get it repealed.
But apparently some Republican Senators are getting cold feet and today Trump took to Twitter to call them out and to double down on this veto threat:
Looks like certain Republican Senators are getting cold feet with respect to the termination of Big Tech’s Section 230, a National Security and Election Integrity MUST. For years, all talk, no action. Termination must be put in Defense Bill!!! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 3, 2020
According to Axios, here’s what is going on behind the scenes and why Trump sent the above tweet a few minutes ago:
Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) told President Trump on Wednesday he’ll likely fail to get two big wishes in pending defense spending legislation, bellowing into his cellphone: “This is the only chance to get our bill passed,” a source who overheard part of their conversation tells Axios. Republicans are ready to test whether Trump’s threats of vetoing the bill, which has passed every year for more than half a century, are empty. Inhofe leveled with Trump — over speakerphone while walking through the Senate’s Russell Building — that the bill won’t meet his demand to repeal liability protections for tech companies, or block efforts to re-title military bases named for Confederate figures. The White House declined to comment. Inhofe’s office did not respond to a request for comment. Inhofe, who is leading negotiations on the National Defense Authorization Act as chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, addressed “Mr. President” before making his “only chance” comment during a midday call. The source could not help but overhear the conversation due to the speakerphone’s volume. Many Republican lawmakers tell Axios that while the tech liability element, Section 230, needs to be reformed, it doesn’t make sense to tie unrelated language to the NDAA. Inhofe told reporters as much on Wednesday, but said the provision “has nothing to do with the military.” “You can’t do it in this bill,” Inhofe said, adding that he has relayed this to Trump. Many also believe they have the votes to override a presidential veto, if necessary. Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) quote tweeted Trump’s veto threats earlier today and wrote: “I will vote to override. Because it’s really not about you.” Members from both parties are eager to get this legislation passed so they can move onto a government spending bill, due by Dec. 11, and delivering coronavirus relief.
It actually makes more sense politically to tie a repeal of Section 230 to the NDAA than to a bill delivering coronavirus relief. Can you imagine the outrage over that? It’s not about the subject of the bill, per se, but the fact that they must pass the bill. This is why Trump is fighting so hard to get this repeal in this bill.
I think at the end of the day one of two things will happen. Republicans won’t repeal Section 230 and thus Trump will eventually fold, or Trump will veto the bill and Congress will override his veto. Last year’s NDAA passed the Senate with 86 votes and the House with 377 votes.


therightscoop--2020-12-04--Trump says termination of Section 230 won’t be added to NDAA and he will VETO

Trump tweeted overnight that Senator Inhofe would not be putting the termination of Section 230 into the National Defense Authorization @ @ @ @ @ see , Trump is still vowing to veto the bill without it .
Trump also @ @ @ @ @ bill contains a provision for ‘ renaming ’ and ‘ desecrating ’ our national monuments @ @ @ @ @ passed by overwhelming majorities like it did last year , then Trump ’ s veto @ @ @ @ @ They ’ ll just override it easily .
But we ’ ll see what happens @

Trump tweeted overnight that Senator Inhofe would not be putting the termination of Section 230 into the National Defense Authorization Act:
Very sadly for our Nation, it looks like Senator @JimInhofe will not be putting the Section 230 termination clause into the Defense Bill. So bad for our National Security and Election Integrity. Last chance to ever get it done. I will VETO! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 4, 2020
But doesn’t get rid of Big Tech’s windfall, Section 230, a grave threat to National Security. I will VETO! https://t.co/QI7BfNc7hb — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 4, 2020
As you can see, Trump is still vowing to veto the bill without it.
Trump also tweeted this morning that the bill contains a provision for ‘renaming’ and ‘desecrating’ our national monuments:
A provision is in the NDAA for the renaming, or even desecration, of National Monuments in National Parks. This is not what our Country wants! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 4, 2020
Assuming the NDAA gets passed by overwhelming majorities like it did last year, then Trump’s veto won’t matter. They’ll just override it easily. But we’ll see what happens.


therightscoop--2020-12-05--NEW: President Trump orders ‘majority’ of U.S. troops withdrawn from Somalia

President Donald Trump has ordered that the majority of American troops stationed in Somalia be withdrawn and moved by early 2021 , the latest in his many moves toward reducing foreign entanglements and commitments for America ’ s fighting men and women .
The U.S. presence will be maintained , not removed to home , but will operate consolidated with forces in neighboring nations , it seems .
“ The President of the United States has ordered the Department of Defense and the United States Africa Command to reposition the majority of personnel and assets out of Somalia by early @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the Pentagon .
“ The U.S. is not withdrawing or disengaging from Africa .
We remain committed to our African partners and enduring support through a whole-of-government approach.
” Hey you can ’ t have everything all at once , but this is a big move .
The mission in Somalia has centered mostly on training Somali forces in fighting the war on terror .
“ While a change in force posture , this action is not a change in U.S. policy , ” says the Pentagon .
“ We will continue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threaten our homeland while ensuring we maintain our strategic advantage in great power competition.
” Considering how we ’ ve been whupping on terror organizations for the last four years , it is no surprise that our posture and policy wouldn ’ t change , but that we can relieve some of the active engagement in some locations .
Importantly , our military “ will retain the capability to conduct targeted counterterrorism operations in Somalia , and collect early warnings and indicators regarding threats to the homeland.
” Header image : U.S. Air @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Micah Theurich , licensed under CC BY 2.0

President Donald Trump has ordered that the majority of American troops stationed in Somalia be withdrawn and moved by early 2021, the latest in his many moves toward reducing foreign entanglements and commitments for America’s fighting men and women.
The U.S. presence will be maintained, not removed to home, but will operate consolidated with forces in neighboring nations, it seems.
“The President of the United States has ordered the Department of Defense and the United States Africa Command to reposition the majority of personnel and assets out of Somalia by early 2021,” reads the information release from the Pentagon. “The U.S. is not withdrawing or disengaging from Africa. We remain committed to our African partners and enduring support through a whole-of-government approach.”
Hey you can’t have everything all at once, but this is a big move. The mission in Somalia has centered mostly on training Somali forces in fighting the war on terror.
President Donald Trump has ordered the Pentagon to remove most of the its about 700 troops in Somalia working to assist the East African nation’s military with its long battle against al-Shabab terrorists. https://t.co/AdZSgUZMzT — Stars and Stripes (@starsandstripes) December 4, 2020
“While a change in force posture, this action is not a change in U.S. policy,” says the Pentagon. “We will continue to degrade violent extremist organizations that could threaten our homeland while ensuring we maintain our strategic advantage in great power competition.”
Considering how we’ve been whupping on terror organizations for the last four years, it is no surprise that our posture and policy wouldn’t change, but that we can relieve some of the active engagement in some locations.
Importantly, our military “will retain the capability to conduct targeted counterterrorism operations in Somalia, and collect early warnings and indicators regarding threats to the homeland.”
Header image: U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Micah Theurich, licensed under CC BY 2.0


therightscoop--2020-12-05--Whoa! DOZENS of PA state legislators sign letter URGING congress to OBJECT to state’s ELECTORAL vote

Whoa! DOZENS of PA state legislators sign letter URGING congress to OBJECT to state’s ELECTORAL votes

HOT news from one of the most fought over states , today , as more than 70 members of Pennsylvania ’ s state House and Senate by our count have signed a dramatic letter calling on their state ’ s delegation to the United States Congress to OBJECT to , and vote to sustain the objection to , certification of the electoral college votes from THEIR OWN STATE .
In January , Congress has the last barrier to entry , a joint session during which the nation ’ s legislators certify the results of the electoral college vote and then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The letter filed today by these ELECTED representatives of the people of Pennsylvania to the state ’ s government urges the national representatives for those same citizens to OBJECT to that certification .
The letter is addressed to Bob Casey , Pat Toomey , Brian Fitzpatrick , Dwight Evans , Madeleine Dean , Mary Gay Scanlon , Chrissy Houlahan , Susan Wild , Matthew Cartwright , Daniel Meuser , Scott Perry , Lloyd Smucker , Fred Keller , John Joyce , Guy Reschenthaler , Glenn Thompson , Mike Kelly , Conor Lamb @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Representatives : In 2019 the Pennsylvania General Assembly enacted comprehensive changes to our Commonwealth ’ s Election Code .
These changes both expanded voting access by permitting no excuse mail-in ballots while also implementing reasonable safeguards to ensure that this new system would be secure , transparent , and would ensure that all Americans could have confidence in Pennsylvania ’ s election results .
These changes received bipartisan support , including the signature of Governor Tom Wolf , a Democrat .
It goes on to say that Wolf “ quickly set about undermining @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and lists the offenses ( see below . )
3 U.S.C .
§15 , empowers Congress to reject electoral votes that are not ‘ regularly given ’ or ‘ lawfully certified.
’ The aforementioned conduct has undermined the lawful certification of Pennsylvania ’ s delegation to the Electoral College .
For these reasons , we the undersigned members of the Pennsylvania General Assembly urge you to object , and vote to sustain such objection , to the Electoral College votes received from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania during the Joint Session of Congress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ urge you to object , and vote to sustain such objection , to the Electoral College votes received from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ” That would be a pretty dang big deal if they do it .

HOT news from one of the most fought over states, today, as more than 70 members of Pennsylvania’s state House and Senate by our count have signed a dramatic letter calling on their state’s delegation to the United States Congress to OBJECT to, and vote to sustain the objection to, certification of the electoral college votes from THEIR OWN STATE.
In January, Congress has the last barrier to entry, a joint session during which the nation’s legislators certify the results of the electoral college vote and then that’s the whole shish kebab.
The letter filed today by these ELECTED representatives of the people of Pennsylvania to the state’s government urges the national representatives for those same citizens to OBJECT to that certification.
The letter is addressed to Bob Casey, Pat Toomey, Brian Fitzpatrick, Dwight Evans, Madeleine Dean, Mary Gay Scanlon, Chrissy Houlahan, Susan Wild, Matthew Cartwright, Daniel Meuser, Scott Perry, Lloyd Smucker, Fred Keller, John Joyce, Guy Reschenthaler, Glenn Thompson, Mike Kelly, Conor Lamb, Michael Doyle Jr.
It reads in part:
Dear Senators and Representatives:
In 2019 the Pennsylvania General Assembly enacted comprehensive changes to our Commonwealth’s Election Code. These changes both expanded voting access by permitting no excuse mail-in ballots while also implementing reasonable safeguards to ensure that this new system would be secure, transparent, and would ensure that all Americans could have confidence in Pennsylvania’s election results. These changes received bipartisan support, including the signature of Governor Tom Wolf, a Democrat.
It goes on to say that Wolf “quickly set about undermining the many protections provided under this law” and lists the offenses (see below.)
It concludes:
3 U.S.C. §15, empowers Congress to reject electoral votes that are not ‘regularly given’ or ‘lawfully certified.’ The aforementioned conduct has undermined the lawful certification of Pennsylvania’s delegation to the Electoral College. For these reasons, we the undersigned members of the Pennsylvania General Assembly urge you to object, and vote to sustain such objection, to the Electoral College votes received from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania during the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2021.
“urge you to object, and vote to sustain such objection, to the Electoral College votes received from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania”
That would be a pretty dang big deal if they do it.
Here’s the full letter (PDF).
Loading...
Stay tuned…


therightscoop--2020-12-04--Taking on Big Tech: FORTY states band together against the overlords, as Trump admin SUES

Led by New York , some 40 states are standing up against the big tech overlords who spy on Americans , keep tabs on our activities , parcel up and sell us , and control what we ’ re allowed to see , hear , read , and think .
And they ’ re starting with an anti-trust lawsuit against one of the biggest tyrants of all : Facebook .
“ A group of U.S. states led by New York is investigating Facebook Inc for possible antitrust violations and plans to file a lawsuit against the social media giant next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suit could come as early as within the next seven days and tech sites are buzzing like crazy .
Op-eds are being filed from other tech CEOs arguing to hold up and don ’ t do that .
It ’ s a madhouse .
And as Yid with Lid noted this morning , it ’ s not only people on the right who are in favor .
Breaking up the tech giants via antitrust actions is the best way to tame the biased social media behemoths who claim they aren ’ t publishers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ censor conservative public opinion .
Removing Section 230 protection and leaving them vulnerable to lawsuits may cause them to censor even more than they now do to protect themselves .
Additionally , it will hurt the new competitors who do not become censors .
With forty different U.S. States behind the antitrust approach , Joe Biden will not be able to prevent the break up of the liberal-leaning tech giants should he become POTUS .
At leftwing site Salon , equal enthusiasm , in an article asking “ will Facebook ever face any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ’ s not all , the United States is suing Facebook over a different violation .
The Trump administration on Thursday sued Facebook , accusing it of discriminating against American workers by favouring immigrant applicants for thousands of high-paying jobs .
The Department of Justice ’ s lawsuit opens a new front in the administration ’ s push against tech companies — and its clampdown on immigration — as President Donald Trump enters his final weeks in office .
The suit concerns more than 2,600 positions with an average salary of some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to September 2019 .
“ Facebook engaged in intentional and widespread violations of the law , by setting aside positions for temporary visa holders instead of considering interested and qualified US workers , ” assistant attorney general Eric Dreiband , of the Justice Department ’ s Civil Rights Division , said in a statement outlining the department ’ s allegations .
This is good news even if the company isn ’ t broken up , even if the lawsuit doesn ’ t turn out .
Because it ’ s a shot across their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tech as well .
The people are tired of being ruled by a digital fist and living behind the Silicon Curtain .
Reckonings are at hand .

Led by New York, some 40 states are standing up against the big tech overlords who spy on Americans, keep tabs on our activities, parcel up and sell us, and control what we’re allowed to see, hear, read, and think.
And they’re starting with an anti-trust lawsuit against one of the biggest tyrants of all: Facebook.
“A group of U.S. states led by New York is investigating Facebook Inc for possible antitrust violations and plans to file a lawsuit against the social media giant next week,” Reuters reported.
The suit could come as early as within the next seven days and tech sites are buzzing like crazy. Op-eds are being filed from other tech CEOs arguing to hold up and don’t do that. It’s a madhouse. And as Yid with Lid noted this morning, it’s not only people on the right who are in favor.
Lid adds:
Breaking up the tech giants via antitrust actions is the best way to tame the biased social media behemoths who claim they aren’t publishers but believe they have the right to censor conservative public opinion. Removing Section 230 protection and leaving them vulnerable to lawsuits may cause them to censor even more than they now do to protect themselves. Additionally, it will hurt the new competitors who do not become censors. With forty different U.S. States behind the antitrust approach, Joe Biden will not be able to prevent the break up of the liberal-leaning tech giants should he become POTUS.
At leftwing site Salon, equal enthusiasm, in an article asking “will Facebook ever face any repercussions for its actions?”
And that’s not all, the United States is suing Facebook over a different violation.
The Trump administration on Thursday sued Facebook, accusing it of discriminating against American workers by favouring immigrant applicants for thousands of high-paying jobs. The Department of Justice’s lawsuit opens a new front in the administration’s push against tech companies — and its clampdown on immigration — as President Donald Trump enters his final weeks in office. The suit concerns more than 2,600 positions with an average salary of some $156,000, offered from January 2018 to September 2019. “Facebook engaged in intentional and widespread violations of the law, by setting aside positions for temporary visa holders instead of considering interested and qualified US workers,” assistant attorney general Eric Dreiband, of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, said in a statement outlining the department’s allegations.
This is good news even if the company isn’t broken up, even if the lawsuit doesn’t turn out. Because it’s a shot across their bow, and the rest of Big Tech as well.
The people are tired of being ruled by a digital fist and living behind the Silicon Curtain. Reckonings are at hand.


therightscoop--2020-12-04--JUST IN: Democrat-controlled House votes to LEGALIZE IT, pass legislation to decriminalize marijuana

On Friday afternoon the U.S. House of Representatives , under the control of democrats , voted 228-164 to decriminalize marijuana and expunge criminal records related to marijuana offenses .
It was technically a bipartisan vote , with a humongous FIVE Republicans voting with the dems .
BUT pot dreams may be up in smoke : it ’ s very unlikely it will pass the Republican-controlled Senate .
It ’ s a pretty gimmicky ploy , voting on this now to basically distract people and gum up the works when the Covid stimulus that Republicans and Democrats have been fighting over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guess we have to mention the fact that this is historically significant , as the first time that either branch of congress has voted toward legalization in this country .
Here ’ s more from the AP : Opponents , mostly Republicans , called the bill a hollow political gesture and mocked Democrats for bringing it up at a time when thousands of Americans are dying from the coronavirus pandemic .
“ With all the challenges America has right now , ( Republicans ) think COVID relief should be on the floor , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and cannabis ” on the House floor , said House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy , R-Calif. “ They ’ re picking weed over the workers .
They ’ re picking marijuana over ( providing ) the much-needed money we need to go forward″ to address the pandemic .
That “ cats and cannabis ” line is about both this bill and the one to criminalize owning big cats , because Democrats watched Tiger King or something .
Congress .
You just can not take them seriously .

On Friday afternoon the U.S. House of Representatives, under the control of democrats, voted 228-164 to decriminalize marijuana and expunge criminal records related to marijuana offenses.
It was technically a bipartisan vote, with a humongous FIVE Republicans voting with the dems.
BUT pot dreams may be up in smoke: it’s very unlikely it will pass the Republican-controlled Senate.
It’s a pretty gimmicky ploy, voting on this now to basically distract people and gum up the works when the Covid stimulus that Republicans and Democrats have been fighting over is an ongoing drama.
Still I guess we have to mention the fact that this is historically significant, as the first time that either branch of congress has voted toward legalization in this country.
Here’s more from the AP:
Opponents, mostly Republicans, called the bill a hollow political gesture and mocked Democrats for bringing it up at a time when thousands of Americans are dying from the coronavirus pandemic. “With all the challenges America has right now, (Republicans) think COVID relief should be on the floor, but instead, the Democrats put cats and cannabis” on the House floor, said House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. “They’re picking weed over the workers. They’re picking marijuana over (providing) the much-needed money we need to go forward″ to address the pandemic.
That “cats and cannabis” line is about both this bill and the one to criminalize owning big cats, because Democrats watched Tiger King or something.
Congress. You just cannot take them seriously.


therightscoop--2020-12-04--FBI lawyer who lied to FISA court to surveil Carter Page pleads with judge not to send him to jail…

The former FBI lawyer who lied in order to justify serveiling Carter Page is now pleading for the judge not to send him to prison : NY POST – Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith ’ s legal team is pleading with a judge not to send him to prison for lying to secure surveillance orders against President Trump ’ s 2016 campaign adviser Carter Page .
Clinesmith agreed in August to plead guilty to making false statements when he doctored an email submitted as evidence to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court .
The discovery was made by US Attorney for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the FBI ’ s Russia investigation .
Durham will serve as a special counsel continuing his work under President-elect Joe Biden .
The disgraced attorney faces up to five years in prison , though sentencing guidelines reportedly call for a maximum of six months behind bars .
Clinesmith ’ s legal team argued in court papers that he “ cut a corner ” because he was overworked and “ exhausted , ” Politico reports .
“ In short , when Kevin altered the email in June 2017 , he was spread thin and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ life , ” his legal team said in a filing .
US District Judge James Boasberg is expected to hand down Clinesmith ’ s sentence on Thursday .
Boasberg also serves as a judge on the surveillance court , which is comprised of federal judges who hear cases dealing with efforts to spy on suspected terrorists and spies .
Federal prosecutors are seeking at least three months in prison .
“ It is plausible that his strong political views and/or personal dislike of the current President made him more willing to engage in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he has pled guilty , ” prosecutors said in a filing .
“ While it is impossible to know with certainty how those views may have affected his offense conduct , the defendant plainly has shown that he did not discharge his important responsibilities at the FBI with the professionalism , integrity , and objectivity required of such a sensitive job position.
” Although his wife is pregnant , prosecutors said “ defendant ’ s family circumstances are not so unusual as to warrant special consideration .
”

The former FBI lawyer who lied in order to justify serveiling Carter Page is now pleading for the judge not to send him to prison:
NY POST – Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith’s legal team is pleading with a judge not to send him to prison for lying to secure surveillance orders against President Trump’s 2016 campaign adviser Carter Page.
Clinesmith agreed in August to plead guilty to making false statements when he doctored an email submitted as evidence to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
The discovery was made by US Attorney for Connecticut John Durham’s team reviewing the FBI’s Russia investigation. Durham will serve as a special counsel continuing his work under President-elect Joe Biden.
The disgraced attorney faces up to five years in prison, though sentencing guidelines reportedly call for a maximum of six months behind bars.
Clinesmith’s legal team argued in court papers that he “cut a corner” because he was overworked and “exhausted,” Politico reports.
“In short, when Kevin altered the email in June 2017, he was spread thin and exhausted at work and in his personal life,” his legal team said in a filing.
US District Judge James Boasberg is expected to hand down Clinesmith’s sentence on Thursday.
Boasberg also serves as a judge on the surveillance court, which is comprised of federal judges who hear cases dealing with efforts to spy on suspected terrorists and spies.
Federal prosecutors are seeking at least three months in prison.
“It is plausible that his strong political views and/or personal dislike of the current President made him more willing to engage in the fraudulent and unethical conduct to which he has pled guilty,” prosecutors said in a filing.
“While it is impossible to know with certainty how those views may have affected his offense conduct, the defendant plainly has shown that he did not discharge his important responsibilities at the FBI with the professionalism, integrity, and objectivity required of such a sensitive job position.”
Although his wife is pregnant, prosecutors said “defendant’s family circumstances are not so unusual as to warrant special consideration.”


therightscoop--2020-12-04--Joe Biden said something really weird last night…

Joe Biden , in an attempt to explain how he would handle disagreements with his Vice President , harkened back to how he said he ’ d deal with big disagreements with ‘ Barack ’ : Biden said if ever had a ‘ moral ’ disagreement with ‘ Barack ’ , he ’ d just suddenly get a fake disease and resign .
Hmmmmmm… When you consider Nancy ’ s new 25th Amendment committee , whose sole purpose is to force a president out of office , it makes one wonder if this is the route they will take , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ force him to resign .
Honestly , I don ’ t even want to think of that now with all the voter fraud stuff being contested , but I wouldn ’ t put it past Democrats .
In other news , Joe Biden explained yesterday just how he broke his foot while playing with his dog : President-elect Joe Biden said Thursday that he fractured his foot after tripping on a bath mat following a shower over the weekend and while chasing his dog Major , explaining the incident and saying it isn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Biden , during an interview with CNN on Thursday , explained the incident over the weekend that resulted in a hairline fracture .
“ What happened was I got out of the shower .
I got a dog and anybody who ’ s been around my house knows — dropped , little pup dropped a ball in front of me , and for me to grab the ball , ” Biden explained .
“ And I ’ m walking through this little alleyway to get to the bedroom , and I grabbed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” Biden continued .
“ And I ’ m joking , running after him and grab his tail .
And what happened was that he slid on a throw rug , and I tripped on the rug he slid on.
” “ That ’ s what happened , ” Biden said .
“ Oh man , not a very exciting story.
” Nope not exciting at all .
A lot of people are having fun with it , making Biden sound uber creepy by adding in provocative details .
We won ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we all know he really is creepy around the young ladies…

Joe Biden, in an attempt to explain how he would handle disagreements with his Vice President, harkened back to how he said he’d deal with big disagreements with ‘Barack’:
🚨🚨🚨 Biden on what he would do if he disagrees with Kamala: "I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign." 🤔 pic.twitter.com/eUhamNMgwp — Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) December 4, 2020
Biden said if ever had a ‘moral’ disagreement with ‘Barack’, he’d just suddenly get a fake disease and resign. Hmmmmmm…
When you consider Nancy’s new 25th Amendment committee, whose sole purpose is to force a president out of office, it makes one wonder if this is the route they will take, to declare Biden has some disease and force him to resign.
Honestly, I don’t even want to think of that now with all the voter fraud stuff being contested, but I wouldn’t put it past Democrats.
In other news, Joe Biden explained yesterday just how he broke his foot while playing with his dog:
President-elect Joe Biden said Thursday that he fractured his foot after tripping on a bath mat following a shower over the weekend and while chasing his dog Major, explaining the incident and saying it isn’t a “very exciting story.” Biden, during an interview with CNN on Thursday, explained the incident over the weekend that resulted in a hairline fracture. “What happened was I got out of the shower. I got a dog and anybody who’s been around my house knows — dropped, little pup dropped a ball in front of me, and for me to grab the ball,” Biden explained. “And I’m walking through this little alleyway to get to the bedroom, and I grabbed the ball like this and he ran,” Biden continued. “And I’m joking, running after him and grab his tail. And what happened was that he slid on a throw rug, and I tripped on the rug he slid on.” “That’s what happened,” Biden said. “Oh man, not a very exciting story.”
Nope not exciting at all. A lot of people are having fun with it, making Biden sound uber creepy by adding in provocative details. We won’t do that here, even though we all know he really is creepy around the young ladies…
UPDATE: Great point here by Turley:
CNN got to the bottom on Biden slipping, including details on the throw rug. https://t.co/YXNnsIltQo Perhaps now it will ask if Biden did meet with Bobulinski at the Beverly Hilton Hotel bar in May 2017 to discuss Hunter's shady business dealings? We appear just a throw rug away. — Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) December 4, 2020


therightscoop--2020-12-04--WATCH: Nancy Pelosi SCOLDS reporter, admits she intentionally blocked the coronavirus stimulus

The despicable , horrible and vile Nancy Pelosi just admitted to reporters that she intentionally blocked the coronavirus stimulus after announcing she ’ s ready to accept half of what she was demanding for months : CNN reporter Manu Raju , who asked the question through a mask that was very hard to understand , explained what he said on Twitter : Pelosi didn ’ t just shoot back and say it wasn ’ t a mistake , she scolded Raju for simply asking if it was a mistake to not accept a lower stimulus months ago and then claimed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to accept it , admitting that she was the reason there was no stimulus for months .
Here ’ s the full transcript of her comments via Raju : Pelosi is just evil .
Everything she said here is bullshit , pardon my french .
She is only willing to accept a $ 900 billion stimulus now because she thinks she ’ s gotten the president she wanted .
She intentionally refused to put food on people ’ s tables , to help pay their rent , to put money in their pockets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ insurance , all because she thought it would hurt Trump .
The Senate Democrats , in league with her , intentionally and continually blocked bare bones stimulus bills that didn ’ t have a cacophony of anything .
They didn ’ t care that people were suffering without jobs because they ’ d lost them due to the government lock downs .
They had to do their part to destroy Trump .
And the MSM , including people like Manu Raju , went right along with it and kept their mouths shut .

The despicable, horrible and vile Nancy Pelosi just admitted to reporters that she intentionally blocked the coronavirus stimulus after announcing she’s ready to accept half of what she was demanding for months:
CNN reporter Manu Raju, who asked the question through a mask that was very hard to understand, explained what he said on Twitter:
Pelosi for months has said she wouldn’t accept half-a-loaf on stimulus – but now they’re looking at a $900 billion deal affer Pelosi had been pushing for $2.2 trillion. So I asked her if it were a mistake not to accept half-a-loaf months ago. “It was not a mistake,” she shot back — Manu Raju (@mkraju) December 4, 2020
Pelosi didn’t just shoot back and say it wasn’t a mistake, she scolded Raju for simply asking if it was a mistake to not accept a lower stimulus months ago and then claimed it was an intentional decision to refuse to accept it, admitting that she was the reason there was no stimulus for months. Here’s the full transcript of her comments via Raju:
Pelosi is just evil. Everything she said here is bullshit, pardon my french. She is only willing to accept a $900 billion stimulus now because she thinks she’s gotten the president she wanted. She intentionally refused to put food on people’s tables, to help pay their rent, to put money in their pockets and to ensure they received pandemic unemployment insurance, all because she thought it would hurt Trump.
The Senate Democrats, in league with her, intentionally and continually blocked bare bones stimulus bills that didn’t have a cacophony of anything. They didn’t care that people were suffering without jobs because they’d lost them due to the government lock downs. They had to do their part to destroy Trump. And the MSM, including people like Manu Raju, went right along with it and kept their mouths shut.


therightscoop--2020-12-04--Team Trump has a Dominion voting machine from Georgia and their expert says it did switch votes from

Team Trump has a Dominion voting machine from Georgia and their expert says it did switch votes from Trump to Biden

Yesterday it was reported on Steve Bannon ’ s War Room on Real America ’ s voice that someone testifying @ @ @ @ @ gotten a hold of one of the Dominion voting machines from Ware county in Georgia @ @ @ @ @ , found that 37 votes in this small county were switched from Trump to Biden @ @ @ @ @ up to 52:30 in case the cue doesn ’ t work for you .
John @ @ @ @ @ this , says that a man named Garland Fabarino was the one who analyzed the @ @ @ @ @ to this in court .
As Bannon suggests , even though it ’ s only @ @ @ @ @ county , it still proves it can and has been done , assuming all of @ @ @ @ @ believes that the entire house of cards built on voter fraud will be crumbling soon @ @ @ @ @ s right but I ’ m not going to hold my breath .

Yesterday it was reported on Steve Bannon’s War Room on Real America’s voice that someone testifying for the Trump team had gotten a hold of one of the Dominion voting machines from Ware county in Georgia and after forensically analyzing it, found that 37 votes in this small county were switched from Trump to Biden:
The video is cued up to 52:30 in case the cue doesn’t work for you.
John Fredericks, who is reporting this, says that a man named Garland Fabarino was the one who analyzed the machine and would be testifying to this in court.
As Bannon suggests, even though it’s only 37 votes in this small county, it still proves it can and has been done, assuming all of this is true.
Fredericks believes that the entire house of cards built on voter fraud will be crumbling soon. I hope he’s right but I’m not going to hold my breath.


therightscoop--2020-12-04--Maxine Waters campaign pays daughter $240k

The loathsome Maxine Waters paid her daughter $ 240k out of her campaign funds this past election cycle : NY POST – The daughter of California Rep. Maxine Waters netted around $ 240,000 this past election cycle — from her mother ’ s own campaign , new records show .
The congresswoman ’ s campaigns shelled out payments to Karen Waters for work she did on her 82-year-old mother ’ s reelection campaign , including “ slate mailer management ” and “ GOTV ” — or likely “ Get Out the Vote ” services .
The payments appear in new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ News on Friday .
More than $ 212,600 in disbursements to Karen Waters are broken down into 26 entries such as “ slate mailer management ” fees , “ office expenses ” and “ canvassing ” between March 2019 and September 2020 .
Another $ 28,150 in payments to Karen Waters occurred in October and November , for “ GOTV ” and “ slate mailer management ” fees — though one for $ 1,000 was simply labeled “ Walker payments.
” Maxine Waters , who chairs the House Financial Services Committee , has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before .
Her campaign has paid Karen Waters or her public relations firm Progressive Connections to produce , print and mail slate mailers since 2004 , Fox News said .
Since then , Waters ’ daughter has reportedly received almost $ 1 million from the campaign .

The loathsome Maxine Waters paid her daughter $240k out of her campaign funds this past election cycle:
NY POST – The daughter of California Rep. Maxine Waters netted around $240,000 this past election cycle — from her mother’s own campaign, new records show.
The congresswoman’s campaigns shelled out payments to Karen Waters for work she did on her 82-year-old mother’s reelection campaign, including “slate mailer management” and “GOTV” — or likely “Get Out the Vote” services.
The payments appear in new Federal Election Commission filings reported by Fox News on Friday.
More than $212,600 in disbursements to Karen Waters are broken down into 26 entries such as “slate mailer management” fees, “office expenses” and “canvassing” between March 2019 and September 2020.
Another $28,150 in payments to Karen Waters occurred in October and November, for “GOTV” and “slate mailer management” fees — though one for $1,000 was simply labeled “Walker payments.”
Maxine Waters, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, has been scrutinized over payments to her daughter before. Her campaign has paid Karen Waters or her public relations firm Progressive Connections to produce, print and mail slate mailers since 2004, Fox News said.
Since then, Waters’ daughter has reportedly received almost $1 million from the campaign.


therightscoop--2020-12-06--WATCH as this FIGHT between Back The Blue & ANTIFA in Portland goes just how you THINK it would

It started with a standoff and ended with Antifa getting the beat down from AMERICAN FLAGS .
As Liberty Daily @ @ @ @ @ of tweets culminate in the the feel good video of the day .
Antifa had @ @ @ @ @ the billionth day in a row because they get a pandemic pass from the media @ @ @ @ @ on hand to counterprotest .
Eventually there was a scuffle , and exactly how you @ @ @ @ @ to turn out for Antifa is exactly how it did .
With them crying in @ @ @ @ @ Keep playin , ANTIFA .
See what happens ?

It started with a standoff and ended with Antifa getting the beat down from AMERICAN FLAGS. As Liberty Daily put it, this series of tweets culminate in the the feel good video of the day.
Antifa had an event in Portland for the billionth day in a row because they get a pandemic pass from the media. Back the Blue was on hand to counterprotest. Eventually there was a scuffle, and exactly how you’d EXPECT for that to turn out for Antifa is exactly how it did.
With them crying in their little black masks.
Portland/ Washington protesters and counter-protesters are currently standing off at Franklin and 4th Ave. downtown Olympia. Olympia police are standing by. #Washington #Portland #protest pic.twitter.com/VXzDI66Av0 — Independent Media PDX (@NDpendentPDX) December 5, 2020
At an event labeled “Squash Fascists” Portland/ Washington Protesters gather in Olympia Washington, counter protesters have met them in opposition at The Washington State Capitol Building. #PortlandProtests #Washington #Portland #Seattle #Antifa pic.twitter.com/6ImVmEPnWH — Independent Media PDX (@NDpendentPDX) December 5, 2020
Counter protesters burn an Umbrella that belonged to Portland/ Washington protesters in response to American Flags being burnt. #Portland #portlandprotest #Washington #antifa pic.twitter.com/PCYGpBcaGE — Independent Media PDX (@NDpendentPDX) December 5, 2020
And the coup de grace:
Keep playin, ANTIFA. See what happens?


therightscoop--2020-12-05--WATCH LIVE: President Trump holds rally in Georgia with Senators Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue

Tonight President Donald Trump is speaking at a HUGE rally in Georgia to get out the vote for Kelly Loeffler @ @ @ @ @ upcoming special election that will DECIDE the fate of the Senate .
Will it go @ @ @ @ @ GOP retain control ?
It ’ s not just the Senate ’ s fate but @ @ @ @ @ stake , and President Trump is going to rally the troops .
The President is @ @ @ @ @ there are plenty of speakers up before then .

Tonight President Donald Trump spoke to a HUGE rally in Georgia designed to get out the vote for Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue in the upcoming special election that will DECIDE the fate of the Senate.
Will it go Democrat? Or will the GOP retain control? It’s not just the Senate’s fate but the nation’s at stake, and President Trump rallied the troops.
Watch the full video from the sources below, or two important clips from it here.
Watch live below.
From Right Side Broadcasting (RSBN):
From Fox News:
From Epoch Times:
Enjoy!!


therightscoop--2020-12-05--WATCH: Sidney Powell in new Newsmax interview says deadline NOT Dec. 8th, talks BAGS of SHREDDED bal

WATCH: Sidney Powell in new Newsmax interview says deadline NOT Dec. 8th, talks BAGS of SHREDDED ballots, pre-marked Biden votes and more

Attorney Sidney Powell was on Newsmax TV last night and dropped several information bombs that contradict , again , the narrative of the MSM .
Including that the fraud cases do NOT have to be wrapped by December 8 , as people keep reporting .
“ Well actually , with the fraud case , the December 8th , the deadline doesn ’ t apply , ” said Powell to Newsmax ’ s Grant Stinchfield .
“ We have at least until December 14th.
” “ We might file more suits , but a court in Michigan and Wisconsin today just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” she said .
“ These are not pure election contests that we are filing , these are massive fraud suits that can set aside the results of the election due to this fraud at any time .
And the states should not be certifying the election results in the face of it.
” Powell also explained who the Kraken is , and said that she has in her office right now “ a huge bag of shredded ballots.
” “ I can ’ t wait to see what that discloses , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are more on the way.
” “ The people of America aren ’ t going to allow our President to be defeated by fraudulent election mechanisms , and these people have used every manner and means of voter fraud you can imagine .
It was heavily coordinated , it was heavily funded , ” she said .
Seems like the legal actions from both the Trump team and Powell ’ s separate investigation aren ’ t even close to over .
Courts continue to reject complaints brought by Trump , but the cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weekend that they don ’ t even need the courts to take action .
“ The simple fact is , we don ’ t need courts .
The United States Constitution gives sole power to the state legislator to decide presidential elections , ” he said on Hannity .
“ In fact , if we go back to the Founding Fathers , they would tell us that we are making a mistake.
” So yeah , definitely seems like there will be more to come from all the lawyers .

Attorney Sidney Powell was on Newsmax TV last night and dropped several information bombs that contradict, again, the narrative of the MSM. Including that the fraud cases do NOT have to be wrapped by December 8, as people keep reporting.
“Well actually, with the fraud case, the December 8th, the deadline doesn’t apply,” said Powell to Newsmax’s Grant Stinchfield. “We have at least until December 14th.”
That’s a pretty big deal, y’all.
“We might file more suits, but a court in Michigan and Wisconsin today just gave us a great order recognizing that,” she said. “These are not pure election contests that we are filing, these are massive fraud suits that can set aside the results of the election due to this fraud at any time. And the states should not be certifying the election results in the face of it.”
Powell also explained who the Kraken is, and said that she has in her office right now “a huge bag of shredded ballots.”
“I can’t wait to see what that discloses,” she said. “And there are more on the way.”
“The people of America aren’t going to allow our President to be defeated by fraudulent election mechanisms, and these people have used every manner and means of voter fraud you can imagine. It was heavily coordinated, it was heavily funded,” she said.
Seems like the legal actions from both the Trump team and Powell’s separate investigation aren’t even close to over. Courts continue to reject complaints brought by Trump, but the cases continue. And Giuliani pointed out this weekend that they don’t even need the courts to take action.
“The simple fact is, we don’t need courts. The United States Constitution gives sole power to the state legislator to decide presidential elections,” he said on Hannity. “In fact, if we go back to the Founding Fathers, they would tell us that we are making a mistake.”
So yeah, definitely seems like there will be more to come from all the lawyers.