therightscoop--2020-12-21--$900 BILLION: Congress reaches deal on MASSIVE Covid relief package

Mitch McConnell made the announcement tonight on social media and the details are coming out .
The massive Covid relief @ @ @ @ @ after MONTHS of Democrat intractability .
It ’ s $ 900 billion , which is @ @ @ @ @ trillion or even $ 3 trillion that was on the table at one point .
@ @ @ @ @ get the least are average everyday Americans who have been hurt in the wallet .
@ @ @ @ @ check for individuals .
Which won ’ t be much stimulus , and comes from @ @ @ @ @ make more than $ 75,000 .
So … eh .
CNN ’ s Manu Raju @ @ @ @ @ the details .
Here ’ s Cocaine Mitch announcing the deal on the Senate floor @ @ @ @ @ it .

Mitch McConnell made the announcement tonight on social media and the details are coming out. The massive Covid relief deal has been reached, after MONTHS of Democrat intractability.
It’s $900 billion, which is less than the $1.8 trillion or even $3 trillion that was on the table at one point. Naturally, the people who get the least are average everyday Americans who have been hurt in the wallet.
That equals $600 stimulus check for individuals. Which won’t be much stimulus, and comes from the taxes of people who make more than $75,000. So … eh.
BREAKING: As the American people continue battling the coronavirus this holiday season, they will not be on their own. Congress has just reached an agreement. We will pass another rescue package ASAP. More help is on the way. — Leader McConnell (@senatemajldr) December 20, 2020
CNN’s Manu Raju has the Dems talking about the details.
This is how Pelosi and Schumer explain what’s in the $900 billion relief proposal. Bill text has yet to be released pic.twitter.com/hzcOgxBJji — Manu Raju (@mkraju) December 21, 2020
Here’s Cocaine Mitch announcing the deal on the Senate floor.
And there you have it.


therightscoop--2020-12-21--Defund the Poli–wait SOMEBODY CALL 9-11! City council lib gets keen on cops when crime calls

Seattle City Councilwoman Lisa Herbold called the police on Friday after someone threw a rock through her window .
The same city councilwoman who wants to defund the police .
For a crime she ’ s trying to make unpunishable .
Jason Rantz in Seattle got the details on the sudden change of heart , as the New York Post reports .
The irony is that under a proposal introduced by Herbold , the suspect could avoid criminal charges if caught .
Under the legislation , charges against most misdemeanor suspects could be dismissed if they can show symptoms of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can prove the crime provided for a need to survive , a so-called “ poverty defense , ” the paper reported .
Under the legislation as currently presented in the model bill , Herbold is handing her perpetrator a free pass .
The model bill tells prosecutors to consider dismissing charges against a suspect “ experiencing symptoms of a behavioral health disorder ” while they committed the crime .
Here ’ s more on that poverty defense bill .
Herbold wants a criminal investigation into this man .
She should .
He broke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But in Seattle , thanks to councilmembers like Herbold , we don ’ t punish criminals .
We have an aversion to putting people in jail who are threats to society .
Usually , the councilmembers aren ’ t victims themselves .
They just create the victims with their permissive policies .
Ain ’ t that the truth .
Typical leftist government : it creates victims , and when its proponents have problems , they take advantage of the system for themselves , rules that are for you are not for them .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Birx , all traveling for the holidays while telling you stay home because of Covid .
Just like the greenie celebs preaching to you about doing without while they fly private jets .

Seattle City Councilwoman Lisa Herbold called the police on Friday after someone threw a rock through her window. The same city councilwoman who wants to defund the police. For a crime she’s trying to make unpunishable.
Jason Rantz in Seattle got the details on the sudden change of heart, as the New York Post reports.
The irony is that under a proposal introduced by Herbold, the suspect could avoid criminal charges if caught. Under the legislation, charges against most misdemeanor suspects could be dismissed if they can show symptoms of mental illness or addiction or if they can prove the crime provided for a need to survive, a so-called “poverty defense,” the paper reported.
Rantz writes:
Under the legislation as currently presented in the model bill, Herbold is handing her perpetrator a free pass. The model bill tells prosecutors to consider dismissing charges against a suspect “experiencing symptoms of a behavioral health disorder” while they committed the crime.
Here’s more on that poverty defense bill.
Rantz sums it up nicely.
Herbold wants a criminal investigation into this man. She should. He broke the law and should be punished. But in Seattle, thanks to councilmembers like Herbold, we don’t punish criminals. We have an aversion to putting people in jail who are threats to society. Usually, the councilmembers aren’t victims themselves. They just create the victims with their permissive policies.
Ain’t that the truth. Typical leftist government: it creates victims, and when its proponents have problems, they take advantage of the system for themselves, rules that are for you are not for them.
Just like the Mayors and Governors and Dr. Birx, all traveling for the holidays while telling you stay home because of Covid. Just like the greenie celebs preaching to you about doing without while they fly private jets.
It’s the leftwing American way.


therightscoop--2020-12-21--Watch wealthy white woman KARENSPLAIN to black Surgeon General how to do his job on CBS

Imagine a Fox News host trying to tell a female surgeon general how to do HER job .
It would be field day .
And if the host was white and the surgeon general black ?
Total pandemonium .
But that ’ s the equivalent to what happened on CBS ’ s Face the Nation on Sunday .
Rich white Karen host Margaret Brennan harangued Surgeon General Jerome Adams about vaccinating President Trump .
“ The highest amount of hesitancy about taking the [ vaccine ] shot is from Republicans , 42 percent according to Kaiser , ” said Brennan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whose most important Governor and most popular members of Congress have been scaring Americans about the vaccine for months because they thought Trump might get credit for it .
“ Wouldn ’ t it help to persuade those Republicans , if the Republican President himself came out to try to persuade them to take the vaccine he says he is so proud he fast-tracked ?
Do you have plans to have President Trump get a shot in the arm on camera , ” Brennan imperiously demanded with full air of superiority .
Newsbusters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , writing that “ as Dr. Adams was explaining why the President shouldn ’ t get the vaccination because he had received a monoclonal antibody treatment , and even though we ’ re still learning how long previous bouts with the virus leave a patient protected , Brennan began to yell at and over him.
” Which is exactly what happened .
Just wait until you see the part where she says “ YOU THINK ” about his medical take .
It ’ s as smug as it sounds .
“ From a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remind people that President Trump has had COVID in the last 90 days , he received the monoclonal antibodies , and that is actually one scenario where we tell people , maybe you should hold off on getting the vaccine , talk to your health provider to find out the right time– ” the Surgeon General began to say .
Keeping in mind here that he is a scientist and a disease expert .
Oh and he ’ s the freaking Surgeon General .
“ That doesn ’ t make you immune !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ he tried to speak .
“ Politics aside , there is a medical reason… ” the black Surgeon General expert medical scientist tried to say again .
“ That doesn ’ t make you immune !
” the TV show host continued to explain to him .
“ Well , it does not , but we know that monoclonal antibodies , if you ’ ve been administered them , actually are a potential reason why medically we would tell you to hold off on the vaccination , ” Surgeon General Adams finally was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a different administration and a different TV channel .
Seriously .

Imagine a Fox News host trying to tell a female surgeon general how to do HER job. It would be field day. And if the host was white and the surgeon general black? Total pandemonium.
But that’s the equivalent to what happened on CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday. Rich white Karen host Margaret Brennan harangued Surgeon General Jerome Adams about vaccinating President Trump.
“The highest amount of hesitancy about taking the [vaccine] shot is from Republicans, 42 percent according to Kaiser,” said Brennan, an elite member of the party whose most important Governor and most popular members of Congress have been scaring Americans about the vaccine for months because they thought Trump might get credit for it.
“Wouldn’t it help to persuade those Republicans, if the Republican President himself came out to try to persuade them to take the vaccine he says he is so proud he fast-tracked? Do you have plans to have President Trump get a shot in the arm on camera,” Brennan imperiously demanded with full air of superiority.
Newsbusters sums up the next bit just right, writing that “as Dr. Adams was explaining why the President shouldn’t get the vaccination because he had received a monoclonal antibody treatment, and even though we’re still learning how long previous bouts with the virus leave a patient protected, Brennan began to yell at and over him.”
Which is exactly what happened. Just wait until you see the part where she says “YOU THINK” about his medical take. It’s as smug as it sounds.
“From a scientific point of view, I will remind people that President Trump has had COVID in the last 90 days, he received the monoclonal antibodies, and that is actually one scenario where we tell people, maybe you should hold off on getting the vaccine, talk to your health provider to find out the right time–” the Surgeon General began to say. Keeping in mind here that he is a scientist and a disease expert. Oh and he’s the freaking Surgeon General.
Remember LISTEN TO THE SCIENTISTS? Brennan doesn’t.
“That doesn’t make you immune!” she shrilly shouted over him as he tried to speak.
“Politics aside, there is a medical reason…” the black Surgeon General expert medical scientist tried to say again.
“That doesn’t make you immune!” the TV show host continued to explain to him.
“Well, it does not, but we know that monoclonal antibodies, if you’ve been administered them, actually are a potential reason why medically we would tell you to hold off on the vaccination,” Surgeon General Adams finally was able to say.
Imagine this with a different administration and a different TV channel. Seriously.


therightscoop--2020-12-20--CENSORSHIP: YouTube REMOVES Trump attorney’s opening statement at Senate hearing (but you can watch

CENSORSHIP: YouTube REMOVES Trump attorney’s opening statement at Senate hearing (but you can watch it here)

Not only does Google know better than you , they know better than the U.S. Senate .
And they have more power to do something about their know-it-all-ing than the Senate .
They can just de-platform and erase you .
And that ’ s what they did to Trump attorney Jesse Binall , he says , when they removed a YouTube video he posted of his own testimony before the U.S. Senate .
Good enough for the United States Congress but not good enough for Google ?
This is a sickening reminder of Twitter ’ s censoring of Hunter Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out there : yes , it is censorship .
They are being censored .
Not by the U.S. government .
But definitely by the INTERNET GOVERNMENT .
Just the News pointed out that Google/Youtube missed one user ’ s uploaded version .
It ’ s possible they ’ ll leave it up , now that people have heard what they did .
But tech companies lately don ’ t seem to mind being caught so suppose we ’ ll see .
Remember , YouTube said flat out they ’ ll be censoring videos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thing as tampering with an election .
( No word on if that includes the thousands of hours of CNN , MSNBC , Hillary Clinton , Chuck Schumer , Nancy Pelosi , Michael Moore , Hollywood celebrities , blogger , vloggers , influencers , and others saying Russia tampered with the LAST election . )
Of course , liberals do not care about this or any free speech .
Actually hold p a sec , that ’ s not 100 % true .
They do care , but only because they LOVE censoring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This mess and fascism and wickedness is right out of control and out of the closet .
It ’ s all in the open and they hardly ever try to hide it now .

Not only does Google know better than you, they know better than the U.S. Senate. And they have more power to do something about their know-it-all-ing than the Senate. They can just de-platform and erase you.
And that’s what they did to Trump attorney Jesse Binall, he says, when they removed a YouTube video he posted of his own testimony before the U.S. Senate.
YouTube has decided that my opening statement in the U.S. Seante, given under oath and based upon hard evidence, is too dangerous for you to see; they removed it. To this day, "our evidence has never been refuted, only ignored." Why is Google so afraid of the truth? #BigBrother — Jesse R. Binnall ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ (@jbinnall) December 20, 2020
Good enough for the United States Congress but not good enough for Google? This is a sickening reminder of Twitter’s censoring of Hunter Biden news.
And to the nitpicking libertarians/liberals out there: yes, it is censorship. They are being censored. Not by the U.S. government. But definitely by the INTERNET GOVERNMENT.
Just the News pointed out that Google/Youtube missed one user’s uploaded version. It’s possible they’ll leave it up, now that people have heard what they did. But tech companies lately don’t seem to mind being caught so suppose we’ll see.
Remember, YouTube said flat out they’ll be censoring videos that claim there’s such a thing as tampering with an election. (No word on if that includes the thousands of hours of CNN, MSNBC, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Michael Moore, Hollywood celebrities, blogger, vloggers, influencers, and others saying Russia tampered with the LAST election.)
Of course, liberals do not care about this or any free speech. Actually hold p a sec, that’s not 100% true. They do care, but only because they LOVE censoring the right. Especially this jerk:
Yeah, I transposed two letters in a rather obvious typo. You were fired for an ethics violation when you violated your company’s pay-to-play policy. Let that sink in: you are too unethical for MSNBC. But nice try. https://t.co/Kf5jRo5HX8 — Jesse R. Binnall ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ (@jbinnall) December 20, 2020
This mess and fascism and wickedness is right out of control and out of the closet. It’s all in the open and they hardly ever try to hide it now.


therightscoop--2020-12-20--Trump campaign takes fight BACK to SCOTUS, files to REVERSE PA court and VACATE appointment of BIDEN

Trump campaign takes fight BACK to SCOTUS, files to REVERSE PA court and VACATE appointment of BIDEN electors!!

The Trump campaign today filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court to have three Pennsylvania supreme court cases overturned .
It ’ s the FIRST filing to the highest court by the campaign independently .
The press release , that went out under Rudy Giuliani ’ s name a short time ago , explains the intent of the 250+ page filing .
“ Donald J. Trump for President , Inc. , President Trump ’ s campaign committee , today filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the US .
Supreme Court to reverse a trio of Pennsylvania @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s mail balloting law immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election in violation of Article II of the United States Constitution and Bush v. Gore , ” reads the statement , which says the petition “ seeks relief based on the same Constitutional arguments successfully raised in Bush v. Gore.
” Giuliani also addresses the previous tossed case that went to SCOTUS over the Pennsylvania laws .
“ This petition follows a related Pennsylvania case where Justice Alito and two other justices observed ‘ the constitutionality of the [ Pennsylvania ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the statutory deadline for receipt of mail ballots from 8 pm on election day to 5 pm three days later ] … has national importance , and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.
’ ” The next part seems pretty darn big to me , so I ’ m adding emphasis : “ The petition seeks all appropriate remedies , including vacating the appointment of electors committed to Joseph Biden and allowing the Pennsylvania General Assembly to select their replacements.
” This is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Here is the full press release .
President Trump ’ s campaign today issued the following statement : “ Donald J. Trump for President , Inc. , President Trump ’ s campaign committee , today filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the US .
Supreme Court to reverse a trio of Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases which illegally changed Pennsylvania ’ s mail balloting law immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election in violation of Article II of the United States Constitution and Bush v. Gore .
This represents the Campaign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ filing and seeks relief based on the same Constitutional arguments successfully raised in Bush v. Gore .
“ This petition follows a related Pennsylvania case where Justice Alito and two other justices observed ‘ the constitutionality of the [ Pennsylvania ] Supreme Court ’ s decision [ extending the statutory deadline for receipt of mail ballots from 8 pm on election day to 5 pm three days later ] … has national importance , and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.
’ “ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three decisions which eviscerated the Pennsylvania Legislature ’ s protections against mail ballot fraud , including ( a ) prohibiting election officials checking whether signatures on mail ballots are genuine during canvassing on Election Day , ( b ) eliminating the right of campaigns to challenge mail ballots during canvassing for forged signatures and other irregularities , ( c ) holding that the rights of campaigns to observe the canvassing of mail ballots only meant that they only were allowed to be ‘ in the room ’ – in this case , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ several football fields , and ( d ) eliminating the statutory requirements that voters properly sign , address , and date mail ballots .
“ The petition seeks all appropriate remedies , including vacating the appointment of electors committed to Joseph Biden and allowing the Pennsylvania General Assembly to select their replacements .
The Campaign also moved for expedited consideration , asking the Supreme Court to order responses by December 23 and a reply by December 24 to allow the U.S. Supreme Court to rule before Congress meets on January 6 to consider @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Click here to read the Campaign ’ s Petition .
Click here to read the Campaign ’ s Motion .

The Trump campaign today filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court to have three Pennsylvania supreme court cases overturned. It’s the FIRST filing to the highest court by the campaign independently.
The press release, that went out under Rudy Giuliani’s name a short time ago, explains the intent of the 250+ page filing.
“Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., President Trump’s campaign committee, today filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the US. Supreme Court to reverse a trio of Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases which illegally changed Pennsylvania’s mail balloting law immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election in violation of Article II of the United States Constitution and Bush v. Gore ,” reads the statement, which says the petition “seeks relief based on the same Constitutional arguments successfully raised in Bush v. Gore.”
Giuliani also addresses the previous tossed case that went to SCOTUS over the Pennsylvania laws.
“This petition follows a related Pennsylvania case where Justice Alito and two other justices observed ‘the constitutionality of the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court’s decision [extending the statutory deadline for receipt of mail ballots from 8 pm on election day to 5 pm three days later] … has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.’”
The next part seems pretty darn big to me, so I’m adding emphasis:
“The petition seeks all appropriate remedies, including vacating the appointment of electors committed to Joseph Biden and allowing the Pennsylvania General Assembly to select their replacements.”
Wow.
This is a developing story and may be updated.
Here is the full press release.
President Trump’s campaign today issued the following statement: “Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., President Trump’s campaign committee, today filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the US. Supreme Court to reverse a trio of Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases which illegally changed Pennsylvania’s mail balloting law immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election in violation of Article II of the United States Constitution and Bush v. Gore. This represents the Campaign’s first independent U.S. Supreme Court filing and seeks relief based on the same Constitutional arguments successfully raised in Bush v. Gore. “This petition follows a related Pennsylvania case where Justice Alito and two other justices observed ‘the constitutionality of the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court’s decision [extending the statutory deadline for receipt of mail ballots from 8 pm on election day to 5 pm three days later] … has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.’ “The Campaign’s petition seeks to reverse three decisions which eviscerated the Pennsylvania Legislature’s protections against mail ballot fraud, including (a) prohibiting election officials checking whether signatures on mail ballots are genuine during canvassing on Election Day, (b) eliminating the right of campaigns to challenge mail ballots during canvassing for forged signatures and other irregularities, (c) holding that the rights of campaigns to observe the canvassing of mail ballots only meant that they only were allowed to be ‘in the room’ – in this case, the Philadelphia Convention Center – the size of several football fields, and (d) eliminating the statutory requirements that voters properly sign, address, and date mail ballots. “The petition seeks all appropriate remedies, including vacating the appointment of electors committed to Joseph Biden and allowing the Pennsylvania General Assembly to select their replacements. The Campaign also moved for expedited consideration, asking the Supreme Court to order responses by December 23 and a reply by December 24 to allow the U.S. Supreme Court to rule before Congress meets on January 6 to consider the votes of the electoral college.” – Rudy Giuliani, attorney for President Trump Click here to read the Campaign’s Petition.
Click here to read the Campaign’s Motion.


therightscoop--2020-12-20--[LISTEN] Rudy Giuliani goes OFF and issues CHALLENGE: ‘Prove me nuts! Prove me wrong! Let me have ac

[LISTEN] Rudy Giuliani goes OFF and issues CHALLENGE: ‘Prove me nuts! Prove me wrong! Let me have access to those machines.’

On his radio show this morning Rudy Giuliani issued a challenge on voting machines .
“ Prove me wrong !
Prove me nuts !
” He also went OFF on the media and Democrats , and especially on “ turncoat ” Republicans .
His challenge is just plain logical .
Prove him wrong , he says , by letting him go ahead and take a look !
I mean y ’ all that ’ s dang obvious stuff right there .
“ Let me have access to those machines .
If I ’ m wrong , I make a fool @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take that challenge in a Texas second if I were a Democrat who actually believed the whole thing worked how it was supposed to and I was innocent of any wrongdoing .
Of course , if you AREN ’ T innocent of wrongdoing… There are two clips here , and the first one is long but listen to the whole thing .
The challenge is at the end .
The clip below that is where he SHREDS Republicans .
Next is his eviscerating Republican “ turncoats.
” “ I find you , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I find you the real villains here .
The real people who are destroying the right to vote in America .
The real people who are gon na allow our right of free speech to go under.
” “ WHERE ARE THE PATRIOTS ?
” he asked .
Later in the show , President Trump tuned in .
We ’ ll try to get you that clip as soon as we can .

On his radio show this morning Rudy Giuliani issued a challenge on voting machines. “Prove me wrong! Prove me nuts!” He also went OFF on the media and Democrats, and especially on “turncoat” Republicans.
His challenge is just plain logical. Prove him wrong, he says, by letting him go ahead and take a look! I mean y’all that’s dang obvious stuff right there.
“Let me have access to those machines. If I’m wrong, I make a fool out of myself.”
I’d take that challenge in a Texas second if I were a Democrat who actually believed the whole thing worked how it was supposed to and I was innocent of any wrongdoing.
Of course, if you AREN’T innocent of wrongdoing…
There are two clips here, and the first one is long but listen to the whole thing. The challenge is at the end. The clip below that is where he SHREDS Republicans.
Next is his eviscerating Republican “turncoats.”
“I find you, the Republican turncoats, the Republican quislings, I find you the real villains here. The real people who are destroying the right to vote in America. The real people who are gonna allow our right of free speech to go under.”
“WHERE ARE THE PATRIOTS?” he asked.
That’s a finishing move right there. A killing cut.
Later in the show, President Trump tuned in. We’ll try to get you that clip as soon as we can.


therightscoop--2020-12-20--HALF of states penalize WHITENESS in VACCINE distribution as Woke and NeverTrump Twitter LIE and OBF

HALF of states penalize WHITENESS in VACCINE distribution as Woke and NeverTrump Twitter LIE and OBFUSCATE.

“ Equity.
” That ’ s the top word for the vaccine now .
The New York Times has pitched it ( more than once ) and the CDC ’ s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ( ACIP ) has embraced it .
States are putting it into their plans .
And the people who advocate it are lying about the underlying meaning .
The DailyMail sums it up : The New York Times article everyone is talking about this weekend is theoretically about whether it ’ s more important to slow deaths by prioritizing the elderly , or slow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reading through the whole article reveals a lot more , especially when they quote their experts .
After presenting dozens of quotes like that form various so-called experts , the Times writes ( emphasis added ) : “ Still , some people believe it is wrong to give racial and socioeconomic equity more weight than who is most likely to die.
” Well ain ’ t that STILL just grand ?
Like , “ can you believe that some selfish whites STILL think they should be alive ?
?
” The article goes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who said those selfish people “ need to have bombproof , fact-based , public-health-based reasons for why one group goes ahead of another.
” On social media , “ experts ” are trying to just that , and failing .
Like this guy , who is being retweeted and quoted out the wazoo by the woke horde .
Gregg Gonsalves .
Gregg works in epidemiology and research at Yale , and he starts right off the bat with woke genuflects .
“ These are usually men ” is a great place to start @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the science and facts and not the politics , Gregg .
Gregg then goes into the deets , stomping about how sciencey it all is .
Can ’ t hurt to do a little more Woke CV-padding right ?
Gregg then goes on sarcastically , with snarky sniping at the targets of his scientific wrath for like , a million tweets , before finally saying anything related to the topic .
And it ’ s another dead giveaway .
He ’ s mocking the idea that politics ( read : wokeness ) doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s MOCKING the idea that it DOESN ’ T belong in science .
The scientist !
And that ’ s when he starts trying to play his trick .
It ’ s not very well constructed , quite transparent .
I suspect Gregg , who is usually male , has always been told he ’ s the smartest in the room , and given a platform because of who he is .
Oh bravo .
Standing ovation for that tweet , everyone .
He combined sarcasm , wokeness , an appeal to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not-too-subtle rationalizing rewrite of woke “ equity ” concepts as simply the very science sounding “ social determinants of health.
” Finally , NINETEEN TWEETS IN , he gets to what he came here for .
See he is pretending the woke concept of “ equity ” is the same as discussing risk factors , which of course do include things like general health , availability of care , and environment that can be affected by income , geography , and more .
… and therefore HE is the one being dispassionately scientific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ equity ’ and ‘ disparity ’ and YOU are the one politicizing it .
These two paragraphs from the New York Times article ALONE gives the lie to his equivalence .
Yeah , see , that ’ s the ACIP they ’ re talking about .
The one that Gregg is trying to have a Twitter “ moment ” over .
Because that is what they actually mean .
It ’ s not some mere scientific consideration of risk factors , it ’ s a distribution plan that is accounting for woke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or inequity .
If it was ACTUALLY about the availability of treatment , the socioeconomic status , the lifelong lack of proper care , environmental and geographic risk factors , and all that , then they wouldn ’ t HAVE to use race .
They could use lifelong lack of care , environmental and geographic risk factors , socioeconomic status , availability of treatment and all that IRRESPECTIVE OF RACE .
But it is not actually about those things , as Gregg knows .
As Gregg EMBRACES .
Remember all his woke dog @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yeah .
It ’ s about what it is always about .
The Daily Mail describes how this is working in practice : This goes on and on .
There ’ s more on Twitter under the hashtag # ACIP .
None of us have ever heard of Gregg from Yale before , but today he ’ s being quoted and cited far and wide , because he did that thing that Twitter is designed for .
He was nasty to conservatives , pompous about his politics , treated woke precepts as scientific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ special virtue signal language that the libs and the people who run that awful site adore .
And that translates into influence , and then policy .
Josh Barro noted that Nate Silver ( yes , the polling data guy ) in calling out the first version of the ACIP recommendations to go viral , was not in the wrong .
And NeverTrump MSNBC regular Tom Nichols of COURSE bought into Gregg ’ s thread hook , line , and sinker .
So yeah , there are a hundred other Gregg ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I chose this one .
Most of them are arguing about the Essential Worker vs. Age conundrum .
Guess we ’ re supposed to ignore/accept the “ kill whitey ” part .
Here ’ s an exit thought : If they brand everyone who gets a vaccine to give them more liberty and freedom of movement , and they also decide who gets it or who doesn ’ t based on race … well just think on that one , y ’ all .

“Equity.” That’s the top word for the vaccine now. The New York Times has pitched it (more than once) and the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has embraced it. States are putting it into their plans. And the people who advocate it are lying about the underlying meaning.
The DailyMail sums it up:
Every US state has been advised to consider ethnic minorities as a critical and vulnerable group in their vaccine distribution plans, according to Centers for Disease Control guidance. As a result, half of the nation’s states have outlined plans that now prioritize black, Hispanic and indigenous residents over white people in some way, as the vaccine rollout begins.
The New York Times article everyone is talking about this weekend is theoretically about whether it’s more important to slow deaths by prioritizing the elderly, or slow infection by prioritizing essential workers. But reading through the whole article reveals a lot more, especially when they quote their experts.
For example:
Harald Schmidt, an expert in ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, said that it is reasonable to put essential workers ahead of older adults, given their risks, and that they are disproportionately minorities. “Older populations are whiter, ” Dr. Schmidt said. “Society is structured in a way that enables them to live longer. Instead of giving additional health benefits to those who already had more of them, we can start to level the playing field a bit.”
After presenting dozens of quotes like that form various so-called experts, the Times writes (emphasis added): “Still, some people believe it is wrong to give racial and socioeconomic equity more weight than who is most likely to die.”
Well ain’t that STILL just grand? Like, “can you believe that some selfish whites STILL think they should be alive??”
The article goes on to quote a former Senate aide who said those selfish people “need to have bombproof, fact-based, public-health-based reasons for why one group goes ahead of another.”
On social media, “experts” are trying to just that, and failing. Like this guy, who is being retweeted and quoted out the wazoo by the woke horde. Gregg Gonsalves.
Gregg works in epidemiology and research at Yale, and he starts right off the bat with woke genuflects.
These are usually men, who will assume expertise because they've always been told they were the smartest in the room, were given a platform because of who they are, and feel no sense of humility when they decide to ramble off and take down others. 2/ — Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) December 20, 2020
Here I am talking about @NateSilver538 @mattyglesias and @DouthatNYT who have decided they are the arbiters of truth in science and public health. 3/ — Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) December 20, 2020
“These are usually men” is a great place to start out proving you’re here for the science and facts and not the politics, Gregg.
Gregg then goes into the deets, stomping about how sciencey it all is.
All three believe age-based allocation is the only way to triage vaccine delivery and they've been scornful of the deliberation of #ACIP for talking about things like equity, essential workers, etc. 4/ — Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) December 20, 2020
Can’t hurt to do a little more Woke CV-padding right?
Don't get me wrong. I am all for criticizing scientists. I did it for years as an AIDS activist but what I think differentiates us from them is that we dug deep into the science, had mentorship from some great researchers, took on problems, analyzed them sometimes for years. 6/ — Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) December 20, 2020
Gregg then goes on sarcastically, with snarky sniping at the targets of his scientific wrath for like, a million tweets, before finally saying anything related to the topic. And it’s another dead giveaway.
Politics. No politics in public health please for @DouthatNYT. No conception that public health in its practice is hemmed in by politics on every side. 17/ — Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) December 20, 2020
He’s mocking the idea that politics (read:wokeness) doesn’t belong in science. He’s MOCKING the idea that it DOESN’T belong in science. The scientist!
And that’s when he starts trying to play his trick. It’s not very well constructed, quite transparent. I suspect Gregg, who is usually male, has always been told he’s the smartest in the room, and given a platform because of who he is.
From the politics that make us sick–we call them the social determinants of health (I just heard Ross faint) to the policies we have to fight for to keep people healthy, public health is intertwined with politics, as it is a public not private science. 18/ — Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) December 20, 2020
Oh bravo. Standing ovation for that tweet, everyone. He combined sarcasm, wokeness, an appeal to the “public good” with a not-too-subtle rationalizing rewrite of woke “equity” concepts as simply the very science sounding “social determinants of health.”
Finally, NINETEEN TWEETS IN, he gets to what he came here for.
What sends Ross off the deep end is that racial equity is being raised in the vaccine allocation discussions. Once we talk race, then it's politics for Ross, and he gets to weigh in. Ross always gets to weigh in. 19/ — Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) December 20, 2020
Racial. Equity.
And when young people die? They are often again from African-American, Latino communities. This is what the data shows. So discussing racial equity in health isn't a conversation about affirmative action @Harvard. It's about understanding who gets sick, who dies. 21/ — Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) December 20, 2020
See he is pretending the woke concept of “equity” is the same as discussing risk factors, which of course do include things like general health, availability of care, and environment that can be affected by income, geography, and more.
Yes a strong case can be made for age-based triaging of vaccine allocation. It doesn't take a pundit to see that. 22/ — Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) December 20, 2020
But in addition to age, race/ethnicity are a strong factor in predicting death from #COVID19 in the US. It's just the facts. 23/ — Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) December 20, 2020
So if you wanted to frame vaccine allocation around preventing the most deaths, you'd go with age+race/ethnicity. 24/ — Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) December 20, 2020
… and therefore HE is the one being dispassionately scientific and data-driven by saying prioritization based on ‘equity’ and ‘disparity’ and YOU are the one politicizing it.
Hogwash.
These two paragraphs from the New York Times article ALONE gives the lie to his equivalence.
An independent committee of medical experts that advises the C.D.C. on immunization practices will soon vote on whom to recommend for the second phase of vaccination — “Phase 1b.” In a meeting last month, all voting members of the committee indicated support for putting essential workers ahead of people 65 and older and those with high-risk health conditions. Historically, the committee relied on scientific evidence to inform its decisions. But now the members are weighing social justice concerns as well, noted Lisa A. Prosser, a professor of health policy and decision sciences at the University of Michigan.
“the members are weighing social justice concerns”
Yeah, see, that’s the ACIP they’re talking about. The one that Gregg is trying to have a Twitter “moment” over.
Because that is what they actually mean. It’s not some mere scientific consideration of risk factors, it’s a distribution plan that is accounting for woke concepts of social justice and historic disparity or inequity.
If it was ACTUALLY about the availability of treatment, the socioeconomic status, the lifelong lack of proper care, environmental and geographic risk factors, and all that, then they wouldn’t HAVE to use race. They could use lifelong lack of care, environmental and geographic risk factors, socioeconomic status, availability of treatment and all that IRRESPECTIVE OF RACE.
But it is not actually about those things, as Gregg knows. As Gregg EMBRACES. Remember all his woke dog whistling to start his little thread? Yeah. It’s about what it is always about.
The Daily Mail describes how this is working in practice:
“Some states have made even more specific plans to prioritize communities of color, with 12 states specifically mentioning efforts to partner with healthcare providers in areas with a large minority population to reach ‘diverse populations’, according to Kaiser Family Foundation.”
It is being used in states such as Michigan where minority status and language spoken could be taken into consideration when deciding how high a priority you are for receiving a vaccine.
It reported that California, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Indiana have listed fairness, equity, or both as key principles for vaccine distribution.
This goes on and on. There’s more on Twitter under the hashtag #ACIP.
None of us have ever heard of Gregg from Yale before, but today he’s being quoted and cited far and wide, because he did that thing that Twitter is designed for. He was nasty to conservatives, pompous about his politics, treated woke precepts as scientific truths, and did it in that special virtue signal language that the libs and the people who run that awful site adore. And that translates into influence, and then policy.
Josh Barro noted that Nate Silver (yes, the polling data guy) in calling out the first version of the ACIP recommendations to go viral, was not in the wrong.
Incidentally, Nate Silver is not the one who has embarrassed himself in the public conversation over this. What’s embarrassing is treating public health experts as high priests whose ethical analysis may not be questioned by laypersons. — Josh Barro (@jbarro) December 20, 2020
And NeverTrump MSNBC regular Tom Nichols of COURSE bought into Gregg’s thread hook, line, and sinker.
Brutal counterpoint here from @gregggonsalves. I have stayed out of this one, but this is an important rejoinder: https://t.co/1dyNwyeVws — Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) December 20, 2020
Not to mention journalists galore.
quite a thread and worth reading. Not sure if I've ever seen a Lysistrata reference on twitter before, (certainly not in the context of bioethics). https://t.co/HNDOgD1PHD — Joanne Kenen (@JoanneKenen) December 20, 2020
So yeah, there are a hundred other Gregg’s talking about this right now, but I chose this one.
Most of them are arguing about the Essential Worker vs. Age conundrum. Guess we’re supposed to ignore/accept the “kill whitey” part.
Here’s an exit thought: If they brand everyone who gets a vaccine to give them more liberty and freedom of movement, and they also decide who gets it or who doesn’t based on race … well just think on that one, y’all.


therightscoop--2020-12-22--Trump PUMMELS Mitch McConnell for acknowledging that Biden won the election

Trump wasn ’ t happy last week when Mitch McConnell formally congratulated Biden as president-elect , publicly acknowledging that he won the election .
Axios reports tonight that Trump sent McConnell a special slide entitled “ Sadly , Mitch forgot .
He was the first one off the ship !
” : President Trump lashed out at Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Monday night for acknowledging Joe Biden won the election , sending a slide to Republican lawmakers taking credit for saving McConnell ’ s career with a tweet and robocall .
It ’ s an extraordinary broadside against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ popular Republican in the party , ahead of a crucial runoff election in Georgia on Jan. 5 that will determine control of the Senate .
“ Sadly , Mitch forgot , ” reads the top of the slide sent to Republican senators by Trump ’ s personal assistant , written in red for emphasis .
“ He was the first one off the ship.
” The slide shows polling tightening again to 51 % -40 % before an Oct. 31 Trump robocall .
McConnell ’ s final margin of victory over McGrath was @ @ @ @ @

Trump wasn’t happy last week when Mitch McConnell formally congratulated Biden as president-elect, publicly acknowledging that he won the election. Axios reports tonight that Trump sent McConnell a special slide entitled “Sadly, Mitch forgot. He was the first one off the ship!”:
President Trump lashed out at Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Monday night for acknowledging Joe Biden won the election, sending a slide to Republican lawmakers taking credit for saving McConnell’s career with a tweet and robocall.
It’s an extraordinary broadside against McConnell by the sitting president and most popular Republican in the party, ahead of a crucial runoff election in Georgia on Jan. 5 that will determine control of the Senate.
“Sadly, Mitch forgot,” reads the top of the slide sent to Republican senators by Trump’s personal assistant, written in red for emphasis. “He was the first one off the ship.”
The slide shows polling tightening again to 51%-40% before an Oct. 31 Trump robocall. McConnell’s final margin of victory over McGrath was 57.8%-38.2%.


therightscoop--2020-12-22--UNBREAKING: House passes 5600 page COVID/Omnibus bill that none of them have read – UPDATE: ROLL CAL

UNBREAKING: House passes 5600 page COVID/Omnibus bill that none of them have read – UPDATE: ROLL CALL VOTE ADDED

The House just passed the COVID-relief bill paired with the bigger Omnibus spending bill by an overwhelming majority : I @ @ @ @ @ the roll call to see who those 53 were , but so far it ’ @ @ @ @ @ I ’ ll link it here as soon as it becomes available .
But given @ @ @ @ @ them had a chance to even read the bill , I ’ m sure that @ @ @ @ @ pork and money for Dem states to keep them afloat .
Just a disgusting process @ @ @ @ @ the Senate where they are sure to pass it without reading it too .

The House just passed the COVID-relief bill paired with the bigger Omnibus spending bill by an overwhelming majority:
#Breaking: 359-53, House approves a sweeping $900 billion covid relief package – tied together with a $1.4 trillion spending bill to keep the government open through September. The 5,593-page bill, which was unveiled about seven hours ago, now goes to the Senate. — Manu Raju (@mkraju) December 22, 2020
I’ve been looking for the roll call to see who those 53 were, but so far it’s not out yet. I’ll link it here as soon as it becomes available.
But given the fact that none of them had a chance to even read the bill, I’m sure that it’s chocked full pork and money for Dem states to keep them afloat. Just a disgusting process.
Now it goes to the Senate where they are sure to pass it without reading it too.
UPDATE: Here’s the roll call vote.


therightscoop--2020-12-22--WATCH: Newsmax just aired a big DISCLAIMER on their Dominion and Smartmatic coverage, following Fox

WATCH: Newsmax just aired a big DISCLAIMER on their Dominion and Smartmatic coverage, following Fox News…

Newsmax today just aired a big disclaimer on their coverage of the Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic : First let me say that I know the guy who posted this is Media Matters , but the clip still stands on its own .
Secondly , Newsmax actually posted the entire statement from this video segment on their website : Since election day , various guests , attorneys and elected officials have appeared on Newsmax TV and offered opinions and claims about Smartmatic and Dominion Systems , both companies that offer voting software in the U.S. Newsmax would like to clarify @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not reported as true certain claims made about these companies .
There are several facts our viewers and readers should be aware .
Newsmax has found no evidence either Dominion or Smartmatic owns the other , or has any business association with each other .
We have no evidence Dominion uses Smartmatic ’ s software or vice versa .
No evidence has been offered that Dominion or Smartmatic used software or reprogrammed software that manipulated votes in the 2020 election .
Smartmatic has stated its software was only used in the 2020 election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used in any battleground state contested by the Trump campaign and Newsmax has no evidence to the contrary .
Dominion has stated its company has no ownership relationship with the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ’ s family , Sen. Dianne Feinstein ’ s family , the Clinton family , Hugo Chavez , or the government of Venezuela .
Neither Dominion nor Smartmatic has any relationship with George Soros .
Smartmatic is a U.S. company and not owned by the Venezuelan government , Hugo Chavez or any foreign official or entity .
Smartmatic states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ While the company did election projects in Venezuela from 2004 to 2017 , it states it never was founded by Hugo Chavez , nor did it have a corrupt relationship with him or the Venezuelan government .
Smartmatic has been threatening lawsuits and Newsmax isn ’ t the only one doing this .
Lou Dobbs ran this segment recently as well , which is very similar to what Newsmax did above : I ’ ve read that Maria Bartiromo also ran this exact same disclaimer interview on her show as well .
OANN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , if they haven ’ t already , will probably do a similar disclaimer .

Newsmax today just aired a big disclaimer on their coverage of the Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic:
Newsmax just aired this note to "clarify" its coverage of Smartmatic and Dominion. pic.twitter.com/I5XZ7CQpAk — John Whitehouse (@existentialfish) December 21, 2020
First let me say that I know the guy who posted this is Media Matters, but the clip still stands on its own.
Secondly, Newsmax actually posted the entire statement from this video segment on their website:
Since election day, various guests, attorneys and elected officials have appeared on Newsmax TV and offered opinions and claims about Smartmatic and Dominion Systems, both companies that offer voting software in the U.S. Newsmax would like to clarify its news coverage and note it has not reported as true certain claims made about these companies. There are several facts our viewers and readers should be aware. Newsmax has found no evidence either Dominion or Smartmatic owns the other, or has any business association with each other. We have no evidence Dominion uses Smartmatic’s software or vice versa. No evidence has been offered that Dominion or Smartmatic used software or reprogrammed software that manipulated votes in the 2020 election. Smartmatic has stated its software was only used in the 2020 election in Los Angeles, and was not used in any battleground state contested by the Trump campaign and Newsmax has no evidence to the contrary. Dominion has stated its company has no ownership relationship with the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s family, Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s family, the Clinton family, Hugo Chavez, or the government of Venezuela. Neither Dominion nor Smartmatic has any relationship with George Soros. Smartmatic is a U.S. company and not owned by the Venezuelan government, Hugo Chavez or any foreign official or entity. Smartmatic states it has no operations in Venezuela. While the company did election projects in Venezuela from 2004 to 2017, it states it never was founded by Hugo Chavez, nor did it have a corrupt relationship with him or the Venezuelan government.
Smartmatic has been threatening lawsuits and Newsmax isn’t the only one doing this. Lou Dobbs ran this segment recently as well, which is very similar to what Newsmax did above:
I’ve read that Maria Bartiromo also ran this exact same disclaimer interview on her show as well.
OANN was also threatened with a lawsuit and, if they haven’t already, will probably do a similar disclaimer.


therightscoop--2020-12-21--MIKE LEE: Congress to vote on BEHEMOTH 5,600 page bill tonight that NONE of them will have a chance

MIKE LEE: Congress to vote on BEHEMOTH 5,600 page bill tonight that NONE of them will have a chance to read

Mike Lee said Congress will vote on an Omnibus spending bill ( which includes COVID assistance ) tonight that they @ @ @ @ @ which is a massive 5,593 pages long and none of them , of course , @ @ @ @ @ bill is so huge that Lee said it will take THREE HOURS just to print @ @ @ @ @ ll still have to vote on the bill tonight .
It ’ s unreal .
@ @ @ @ @ t be allowed to amend the bill in any way : He ’ s right @ @ @ @ @ members to vote NO on the bill until they ’ ve had the chance to @ @ @ @ @ now would be the time to do it since the election is over and the @ @ @ @ @ two years away .
But you know it won ’ t happen .

Mike Lee said Congress will vote on an Omnibus spending bill (which includes COVID assistance) tonight that they’ve just received, which is a massive 5,593 pages long and none of them, of course, have read it:
1/4 This is the spending bill under consideration in Congress today. I received it just moments ago, and will likely be asked to vote on it late tonight. It’s 5,593 pages long. I know there are some good things in it. I’m equally confident that there are bad things in it. pic.twitter.com/SoWXnEWYfV — Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) December 21, 2020
The bill is so huge that Lee said it will take THREE HOURS just to print out. And they’ll still have to vote on the bill tonight. It’s unreal.
Lee says members won’t be allowed to amend the bill in any way:
2/4 Here’s the really sad thing: we’re being told that there will be no opportunity to amend or improve it. As a result, nearly every member of Congress — House and Senate, Democrat or Republican — will have been excluded from the process of developing this bill, — Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) December 21, 2020
3/4 which will cost American taxpayers trillions of dollars. This process, by which members of Congress are asked to defer blindly to legislation negotiated entirely in secret by four of their colleagues, must come to an end. — Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) December 21, 2020
4/4 It won’t come to an end until no longer works for those empowered by it. That can happen, but only when most members of both houses and both political parties stop voting for bills they haven’t read—and, by design, cannot read until after it’s too late. — Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) December 21, 2020
He’s right. It would take enough members to vote NO on the bill until they’ve had the chance to read it. Honestly, now would be the time to do it since the election is over and the next one is at least two years away. But you know it won’t happen.


therightscoop--2020-12-21--“AOC is right!” – Ted Cruz (updated)

“AOC is right!” – Ted Cruz (updated)

Ted Cruz lauded AOC today for being right about a protest she made on Twitter : I ’ m not sure exactly what bill AOC is talking about , but I suspect it ’ s the larger government funding bill to avoid a shutdown .
I can ’ t think of anything else it might be with that price tag .
This isn ’ t just a problem within Democratic circles .
Congress always does crap like this when they want to pass something huge .
They waive the rules they created for show , which dictates how much time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before having to vote on it , and then force members to vote on the bill without knowing what ’ s really in it .
Which we all know is Pelosi ’ s preferred way of passing big bills .
So in this rare case , AOC is exactly right and kudos to her for calling out Congress publicly .
But in the long run , I doubt it will make much difference .
Leaders in Congress will keep doing this garbage , just like we ’ ve seen them do it too @ @ @ @ @ @ @ After further reading , I believe what AOC is referring to is both the COVID relief bill ( $ 900B ) AND the omnibus funding bill ( $ 1.4T ) , which are being paired together .
This has caused some confusion , with some suggesting the COVID bill has foreign aid in it .
It doesn ’ t :

Ted Cruz lauded AOC today for being right about a protest she made on Twitter:
Congress is expected to vote on the second largest bill in US history *today* – $2.5 trillion – and as of about 1pm, members don’t even have the legislative text of it yet. — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) December 21, 2020
It’s not good enough to hear about what’s in the bill. Members of Congress need to see & read the bills we are expected to vote on. I know it’s “controversial” & I get in trouble for sharing things like this, but the people of this country deserve to know. They deserve better. — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) December 21, 2020
I’m not sure exactly what bill AOC is talking about, but I suspect it’s the larger government funding bill to avoid a shutdown. I can’t think of anything else it might be with that price tag.
Here’s the response from Ted Cruz:
.@AOC is right. It’s ABSURD to have a $2.5 trillion spending bill negotiated in secret and then—hours later—demand an up-or-down vote on a bill nobody has had time to read. #CongressIsBroken https://t.co/EQp8BfRBHj — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) December 21, 2020
This isn’t just a problem within Democratic circles. Congress always does crap like this when they want to pass something huge. They waive the rules they created for show, which dictates how much time members must have to digest a bill before having to vote on it, and then force members to vote on the bill without knowing what’s really in it. Which we all know is Pelosi’s preferred way of passing big bills.
So in this rare case, AOC is exactly right and kudos to her for calling out Congress publicly. But in the long run, I doubt it will make much difference. Leaders in Congress will keep doing this garbage, just like we’ve seen them do it too many times to count.
UPDATE: After further reading, I believe what AOC is referring to is both the COVID relief bill ($900B) AND the omnibus funding bill ($1.4T), which are being paired together. This has caused some confusion, with some suggesting the COVID bill has foreign aid in it. It doesn’t:
NARRATOR: The Covid relief bill did not, in fact, contain $500 million for Israel. Congress passed a suite of bills, including Covid relief *and* the bill funding the Defense Department for 2021, which includes foreign aid. This isn't hard unless you know nothing about Congress. https://t.co/Y558nnKcf2 — Yair Rosenberg (@Yair_Rosenberg) December 21, 2020


therightscoop--2020-12-21--After holding up the covid relief bill for 6 months, Pelosi claims she wanted more money for direct

After holding up the covid relief bill for 6 months, Pelosi claims she wanted more money for direct payments or something…

Pelosi was on the House floor today claiming she wanted more money for direct payments , but suggested what people are getting is ‘ significant ’ as she took credit for the pandemic aid bill : The Daily Caller had a great response to this video : Exactly .
She is the reason why the bill is only getting settled right now , just a few days before Christmas .
She wouldn ’ t agree to anything whatsoever until the election was over , because she was using it try and defeat Trump .
And only after the election was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how she berated Wolf Blitzer for daring to hold her accountable for holding up the bill ?
Here ’ s a breakdown of where the $ 900 billion is slated to go in this bill : I may not have Dr. Jill Biden ’ s Education PhD , but that doesn ’ t add up to $ 900 billion .
It ’ s $ 739 billion .
Where is the other $ 161 billion or so going in this pandemic aid bill ?
Is it going to bail out Democrat states or someone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Seems to me that money could have been added to the $ 166 billion to substantially increase direct payments .
Or to the unemployment insurance , etc .
If the MSM were worth anything at all , it wouldn ’ t have just been Wolf Blitzer trying to hold Pelosi ’ s feet to the fire in October .
Especially after her ‘ let them eat cake ’ hair salon appointment earlier this year .

Pelosi was on the House floor today claiming she wanted more money for direct payments, but suggested what people are getting is ‘significant’ as she took credit for the pandemic aid bill:
Speaker Pelosi on the $600 direct payment checks in the new stimulus bill: "I would like them to have been bigger, but they are significant."pic.twitter.com/lgcGXumalP — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) December 21, 2020
The Daily Caller had a great response to this video:
"Sorry I held up covid relief for six months. Enjoy your $600." pic.twitter.com/mKbt7XWvr8 — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) December 21, 2020
Exactly. She is the reason why the bill is only getting settled right now, just a few days before Christmas. She wouldn’t agree to anything whatsoever until the election was over, because she was using it try and defeat Trump. And only after the election was she truly ready to negotiate.
Remember how she berated Wolf Blitzer for daring to hold her accountable for holding up the bill?
Here’s a breakdown of where the $900 billion is slated to go in this bill:
Coronavirus relief deal: PPP loans –> $284 billion Direct payments –> $166 billion Unemployment insurance –> $120 billion Schools –> $82 billion Vaccines –> $30 billion Testing –> $22 billion Small business grants –> $20 billion Live event venues –> $15 billion — David Nicholas (@DavidANicholas) December 21, 2020
I may not have Dr. Jill Biden’s Education PhD, but that doesn’t add up to $900 billion. It’s $739 billion. Where is the other $161 billion or so going in this pandemic aid bill? Is it going to bail out Democrat states or someone’s pork projects that Democrats demanded? Seems to me that money could have been added to the $166 billion to substantially increase direct payments. Or to the unemployment insurance, etc.
If the MSM were worth anything at all, it wouldn’t have just been Wolf Blitzer trying to hold Pelosi’s feet to the fire in October. Especially after her ‘let them eat cake’ hair salon appointment earlier this year.


therightscoop--2020-12-21--BREAKING: AG Barr says shoots down appointing special counsels for election fraud, Hunter Biden

This morning AG Barr said he sees no reason to appoint a special counsel for either the Hunter Biden case or to investigate election fraud from this past election : FOX NEWS – Attorney General William Barr on Monday said he has “ no plan ” to appoint a special counsel to take over the federal investigation into Hunter Biden ’ s “ tax affairs , ” or one to probe allegations of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election .
Barr announced last week that he would depart from his post as attorney general on Dec. 23 — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Republicans have been demanded that a special counsel be appointed to continue the federal investigation into Hunter Biden to ensure that it continues through the incoming Biden administration .
President Trump reportedly had been discussing a potential special counsel for that investigation .
But Barr , on Monday , said he has no plans to appoint a special counsel for that investigation , or one to review the election , that before he leaves the Justice Department .
“ I think to the extent that there ’ s an investigation , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ responsibly and professionally , ” Barr said Monday about the investigation into Hunter Biden .
“ To this point I have not seen a reason to appoint a special counsel and I have no plan to do so before I leave.
” This is very disappointing .
As we ’ ve made the point already , there needs to be a serious special counsel investigation to hold the Biden crime family to account for , at the very least , selling the office of the Vice Presidency to Burisma for millions .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he ’ s clearly compromised and that needs to be exposed as well .
Biden is the epitome of so much of what Democrats and the media accused Trump of being , yet they don ’ t give a damn because he ’ s their candidate .
And regarding the apparent election fraud , I just feel that without a serious investigation into what we all know transpired in this recent election , a lot of people won ’ t vote in the next election .
An independent special counsel is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the election .

This morning AG Barr said he sees no reason to appoint a special counsel for either the Hunter Biden case or to investigate election fraud from this past election:
FOX NEWS – Attorney General William Barr on Monday said he has “no plan” to appoint a special counsel to take over the federal investigation into Hunter Biden’s “tax affairs,” or one to probe allegations of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Barr announced last week that he would depart from his post as attorney general on Dec. 23 — before the end of the Trump administration. Republicans have been demanded that a special counsel be appointed to continue the federal investigation into Hunter Biden to ensure that it continues through the incoming Biden administration. President Trump reportedly had been discussing a potential special counsel for that investigation. But Barr, on Monday, said he has no plans to appoint a special counsel for that investigation, or one to review the election, that before he leaves the Justice Department. “I think to the extent that there’s an investigation, I think that it’s being handled responsibly and professionally,” Barr said Monday about the investigation into Hunter Biden. “To this point I have not seen a reason to appoint a special counsel and I have no plan to do so before I leave.”
This is very disappointing. As we’ve made the point already, there needs to be a serious special counsel investigation to hold the Biden crime family to account for, at the very least, selling the office of the Vice Presidency to Burisma for millions. And with all his dealings with the Chinese, he’s clearly compromised and that needs to be exposed as well.
Biden is the epitome of so much of what Democrats and the media accused Trump of being, yet they don’t give a damn because he’s their candidate.
And regarding the apparent election fraud, I just feel that without a serious investigation into what we all know transpired in this recent election, a lot of people won’t vote in the next election. An independent special counsel is a must to restore people’s faith in the election.


therightscoop--2020-12-21--Woke Governor of Virginia has Robert E. Lee statue REMOVED from US Capitol

Ralph Northam , the woke governor of Virginia , just had the state ’ s statue of Robert E. Lee removed from the US Capitol overnight : FOX NEWS – Virginia Gov .
Ralph Northam announced early Monday morning that overnight his state removed a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee from the U.S. Capitol ’ s National Statuary Hall Collection .
Each state is permitted to have two statues in the collection , and since 1909 Virginia had one of Lee and one of President George Washington .
A state commission last week decided that a statue of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take its place .
“ The Confederacy is a symbol of Virginia ’ s racist and divisive history , and it is past time we tell our story with images of perseverance , diversity and inclusion , ” Northam said in a statement .
“ I look forward to seeing a trailblazing young woman of color represent Virginia in the U.S. Capitol , where visitors will learn about Barbara Johns ’ contributions to America and be empowered to create positive change in their communities just like she did.
” Johns , as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ led a walkout at Robert Russa Moton High School in protest of conditions at the all-Black school that were inferior to the local White school .
This led to a court battle that became one of the five cases decided by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education , which ended school segregation .
Sen. Tim Kaine , D-Va. , and Rep. Jennifer Wexton , D-Va. , were present for the removal of the Lee statue , along with a representative from Northam ’ s office .
The Virginia Museum of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ownership of the statue , as per a request from the state commission .

Ralph Northam, the woke governor of Virginia, just had the state’s statue of Robert E. Lee removed from the US Capitol overnight:
FOX NEWS – Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam announced early Monday morning that overnight his state removed a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee from the U.S. Capitol’s National Statuary Hall Collection.
Each state is permitted to have two statues in the collection, and since 1909 Virginia had one of Lee and one of President George Washington. A state commission last week decided that a statue of civil rights leader Barbara Rose Johns will take its place.
“The Confederacy is a symbol of Virginia’s racist and divisive history, and it is past time we tell our story with images of perseverance, diversity and inclusion,” Northam said in a statement. “I look forward to seeing a trailblazing young woman of color represent Virginia in the U.S. Capitol, where visitors will learn about Barbara Johns’ contributions to America and be empowered to create positive change in their communities just like she did.”
Johns, as a 16-year-old high school student in 1951, led a walkout at Robert Russa Moton High School in protest of conditions at the all-Black school that were inferior to the local White school. This led to a court battle that became one of the five cases decided by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education, which ended school segregation.
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., and Rep. Jennifer Wexton, D-Va., were present for the removal of the Lee statue, along with a representative from Northam’s office. The Virginia Museum of History and Culture in Richmond will take ownership of the statue, as per a request from the state commission.


therightscoop--2020-12-21--AOC records video of her taking vaccine, but why?

On her instagram channel this weekend , AOC recorded herself taking the Pfizer vaccine after doses became available to Congress and they were urged to take it : AOC clearly sees herself as a role model , saying “ I would would never , ever ask you to do something I wasn ’ t willing to do myself.
” But the big question people have on social media is why , being so young and healthy , she is taking the vaccine now when others need it so badly ?
It wasn ’ t just people on the right criticizing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ according to the NY Post : “ AOC , I love you , but I ’ m a nurse and I ’ m still waiting to get mine so what exactly qualifies politicians to get a vaccine before healthcare workers ?
” one follower commented .
“ Why are you getting this before health care workers ?
I put breathing tubes in people ’ s airways for 13hrs a day , ” griped another .
“ This feels as self-serving as every other politician .
It ’ s disappointing and a slap in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have showed up since March to care for others .
National Security won ’ t be impacted by my shifts this week with COVID patients at an all time high in the hospital and no vaccine in sight.. but I ’ ll still providing anesthesia to very sick people and not seeing my family while politicians get prioritized over me and my coworkers .
Enjoy your time off with your vaccine..
I ’ ll be standing in the n95 for 13+hrs a day.
” I would expect people in Congress like McConnell and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are quite old and potentially vulnerable to the virus , to be among the first to take the vaccine .
But the youngest members of Congress ?
That doesn ’ t make much sense .

On her instagram channel this weekend, AOC recorded herself taking the Pfizer vaccine after doses became available to Congress and they were urged to take it:
AOC clearly sees herself as a role model, saying “I would would never, ever ask you to do something I wasn’t willing to do myself.”
But the big question people have on social media is why, being so young and healthy, she is taking the vaccine now when others need it so badly?
Did I miss the story about all of the healthcare workers, nursing home residents, and people with underlying medical problems already getting their COVID vaccinations? https://t.co/QKwL9TIWWR — Scott Walker (@ScottWalker) December 21, 2020
She's young and healthy. Why is she at the front of the vaccine line? https://t.co/g9yifRqnfL — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) December 20, 2020
Is she over 70? How on earth did AOC get first in line for the vaccine? https://t.co/Y5IgdCUVCW — Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) December 21, 2020
Congratulations to @AOC for taking cuts in front of people a billion times more likely to get seriously ill or die than she is. #SelfishBrat https://t.co/vs736tVlO2 — Reverend Doctor Jill Biden Derek Hunter (@derekahunter) December 21, 2020
It wasn’t just people on the right criticizing AOC, but her own followers, according to the NY Post:
“AOC, I love you, but I’m a nurse and I’m still waiting to get mine so what exactly qualifies politicians to get a vaccine before healthcare workers?” one follower commented. “Why are you getting this before health care workers? I put breathing tubes in people’s airways for 13hrs a day,” griped another. “This feels as self-serving as every other politician. It’s disappointing and a slap in the face to those of us who have showed up since March to care for others. National Security won’t be impacted by my shifts this week with COVID patients at an all time high in the hospital and no vaccine in sight.. but I’ll still providing anesthesia to very sick people and not seeing my family while politicians get prioritized over me and my coworkers. Enjoy your time off with your vaccine.. I’ll be standing in the n95 for 13+hrs a day.”
I would expect people in Congress like McConnell and Pelosi in positions of power, who are quite old and potentially vulnerable to the virus, to be among the first to take the vaccine. But the youngest members of Congress? That doesn’t make much sense.


therightscoop--2020-12-22--UNBREAKING: Senate passes 5,600 page bill overwhelmingly

The Senate has now passed the 2.3 trillion 5,600 page bill , which included COVID relief and an Omnibus spending @ @ @ @ @ to September : Only 7 people against the bill in the Senate and no one @ @ @ @ @ weren ’ t given a chance to read it .

The Senate has now passed the 2.3 trillion 5,600 page bill, which included COVID relief and an Omnibus spending bill that will take us to September:
#Breaking @Fox5DC: The U.S. Senate has now joined the House tonight in passing the $900 Billion Covid-19 economic stimulus bill 91-7. The legislation now heads to The White House where President Trump is expected to sign it. pic.twitter.com/BnOZ8jnHCq — Tom Fitzgerald (@FitzFox5DC) December 22, 2020
BREAKING: The Senate just passed another major bipartisan, COVID-19 relief package. The American people can rest assured that more help is on the way, immediately. — Leader McConnell (@senatemajldr) December 22, 2020
Only 7 people against the bill in the Senate and no one read it, because they weren’t given a chance to read it.
Ain’t that swell.


therightscoop--2020-12-23--WATCH: Tucker unveils new police footage of Raphael Warnock and his ex-wife dissing his character

In March of this year , Raphael Warnock was angry because his now-ex wife , Oulèye Ndoye , wouldn ’ t get out of the way so he could leave with the kids , and allegedly ran over her foot with his car : Rick Leventhal reports that nothing happened to Warnock , that Oulèye ’ s foot was checked out by EMS and wasn ’ t bruised or broken .
But as the police officer listened , Oulèye had this to say about Warnock as she began to cry : “ This man ’ s running for the United @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right now is his reputation .
I work at the Mayor ’ s office and this is a big problem .
I ’ ve been trying to be very quiet about the way that he is for the sake of my kids and his reputation .
I ’ ve tried to keep the way he acts under wraps for a long time , and today he crossed the line .
So that is what is going on here .
He is a great actor ; he is phenomenal at putting on a really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ catch , eh ?
I hope Georgia voters are smart enough to keep him as far away from the US Senate as possible .

In March of this year, Raphael Warnock was angry because his now-ex wife, Oulèye Ndoye, wouldn’t get out of the way so he could leave with the kids, and allegedly ran over her foot with his car:
Georgia Democrat Raphael Warnock's ex-wife on his character after he allegedly ran over her foot with his car: "I've tried to keep the way he acts under wraps for a long time, & today he crossed the line… He is a great actor. He is phenomenal at putting on a really good show." pic.twitter.com/0SuLy1IPub — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) December 23, 2020
Rick Leventhal reports that nothing happened to Warnock, that Oulèye’s foot was checked out by EMS and wasn’t bruised or broken.
But as the police officer listened, Oulèye had this to say about Warnock as she began to cry:
“This man’s running for the United States Senate and all he cares about right now is his reputation. I work at the Mayor’s office and this is a big problem. I’ve been trying to be very quiet about the way that he is for the sake of my kids and his reputation. I’ve tried to keep the way he acts under wraps for a long time, and today he crossed the line. So that is what is going on here. He is a great actor; he is phenomenal at putting on a really good show.”
Warnock sounds like real catch, eh? I hope Georgia voters are smart enough to keep him as far away from the US Senate as possible.


therightscoop--2020-12-23--Trump blasts COVID relief bill passed by Congress, demands they amend it to give people more money

Trump just released a video blasting the COVID relief bill passed by Congress , demanding they amend it so that @ @ @ @ @ than simply $ 600 per person : President Trump slammed the recently passed $ 900 @ @ @ @ @ a “ disgrace ” on Tuesday evening , urging Congress amend the bill to increase @ @ @ @ @ Americans .
“ I am asking Congress to amend this bill and increase the ridiculously @ @ @ @ @ 2,000 , or $ 4,000 for a couple , ” Trump said in a video @ @ @ @ @ addition , Trump is demanding that lawmakers “ get rid of the wasteful and unnecessary @ @ @ @ @ , “ or else the next administration will have to deliver a COVID relief package @ @ @ @ @ will be me , ” Trump added .
“ And we will get it done @ @

Trump just released a video blasting the COVID relief bill passed by Congress, demanding they amend it so that people get far more money than simply $600 per person:
Here’s a bit more from Fox News:
President Trump slammed the recently passed $900 billion COVID-19 relief package as a “disgrace” on Tuesday evening, urging Congress amend the bill to increase the direct payments given to Americans.
“I am asking Congress to amend this bill and increase the ridiculously low $600 to $2,000, or $4,000 for a couple,” Trump said in a video posted to Twitter.
In addition, Trump is demanding that lawmakers “get rid of the wasteful and unnecessary items” from the legislation, “or else the next administration will have to deliver a COVID relief package”
“Maybe that administration will be me,” Trump added. “And we will get it done.”


therightscoop--2020-12-23--Trump pardons 15 people, including George Papadopoulos

Trump doled out a big presidential pardon to George Papadopoulos tonight , as well as 14 other people .
Not all of them were full pardons , as a few were sentence commutations : AP – President Donald Trump on Tuesday pardoned 15 people , including Republican allies , a 2016 campaign official ensnared in the Russia probe and former government contractors convicted in a 2007 massacre in Baghdad .
The pardons included former Republican Reps. Duncan Hunter of California and Chris Collins of New York .
Collins , the first member of Congress to endorse Trump to be president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two months in federal prison after admitting he helped his son and others dodge $ 800,000 in stock market losses when he learned that a drug trial by a small pharmaceutical company had failed .
Hunter was sentenced to 11 months in prison after pleading guilty to stealing campaign funds and spending the money on everything from outings with friends to his daughter ’ s birthday party .
Trump also announced a pardon for George Papadopoulos , his 2016 campaign adviser whose conversation unwittingly helped trigger the Russia investigation that shadowed Trump ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ By pardoning Papadopoulos , Trump once again took aim at special counsel Robert Mueller ’ s Russia probe and is part of a broader effort by Trump to undo the results of the investigation that yielded criminal charges against a half-dozen associates .

Trump doled out a big presidential pardon to George Papadopoulos tonight, as well as 14 other people. Not all of them were full pardons, as a few were sentence commutations:
AP – President Donald Trump on Tuesday pardoned 15 people, including Republican allies, a 2016 campaign official ensnared in the Russia probe and former government contractors convicted in a 2007 massacre in Baghdad.
The pardons included former Republican Reps. Duncan Hunter of California and Chris Collins of New York.
Collins, the first member of Congress to endorse Trump to be president, was sentenced to two years and two months in federal prison after admitting he helped his son and others dodge $800,000 in stock market losses when he learned that a drug trial by a small pharmaceutical company had failed.
Hunter was sentenced to 11 months in prison after pleading guilty to stealing campaign funds and spending the money on everything from outings with friends to his daughter’s birthday party.
Trump also announced a pardon for George Papadopoulos, his 2016 campaign adviser whose conversation unwittingly helped trigger the Russia investigation that shadowed Trump’s presidency for nearly two years.
By pardoning Papadopoulos, Trump once again took aim at special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe and is part of a broader effort by Trump to undo the results of the investigation that yielded criminal charges against a half-dozen associates.


therightscoop--2020-12-22--Trump authorizes John Durham to share classified info with grand jury

President Trump today signed an order authorizing John Durham to share classified with a grand jury : Sean Davis explains @ @ @ @ @ “ Trump ’ s order eliminates the ability of the CIA or other intelligence community @ @ @ @ @ over whether documents or info they generated may be presented to a grand jury empaneled @ @ @ @ @ the Russia hoax.
” I hope this means John Durham is getting ready to indict @ @ @ @ @ d be smart to get as much done as he can in the next month @ @ @ @ @ I mean .

President Trump today signed an order authorizing John Durham to share classified with a grand jury:
The White House announced today that Trump signed an order on Dec. 18 giving John Durham the authority to present classified information to a grand jury investigating the Russian collusion hoax. Previous DOJ regulations required the consent of the specific classifying agency. pic.twitter.com/VvqxKChb7B — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) December 22, 2020
Sean Davis explains what this order does:
“Trump’s order eliminates the ability of the CIA or other intelligence community agencies from exercising a veto over whether documents or info they generated may be presented to a grand jury empaneled by John Durham to investigate the Russia hoax.”
Trump's order eliminates the ability of the CIA or other intelligence community agencies from exercising a veto over whether documents or info they generated may be presented to a grand jury empaneled by John Durham to investigate the Russia hoax. https://t.co/1RPRyrlfKI — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) December 22, 2020
I hope this means John Durham is getting ready to indict more people. He’d be smart to get as much done as he can in the next month, if you know what I mean.


therightscoop--2020-12-22--WATCH: Biden calls Fox News reporter a “one horse pony” after asking about Hunter Biden

Today a Fox News reporter asked Biden if he still feels the allegations against his son Hunter are ‘ disinformation @ @ @ @ @ starting to walk away , Biden called the Fox News reporter a ‘ one horse @ @ @ @ @ is a ‘ one horse pony ’ ?
I heard of a ‘ one trick @ @ @ @ @ a ‘ one horse pony ’ .
Does a pony ride a horse ?
Well @ @ @ @ @ the teleprompter that got Biden this time , it was his own brain .
Biden @ @ @ @ @ be independent , but just like Obama , you can expect he ’ ll have @ @ @ @ @ rid of his dirty work .
Of that I have no doubt .

Today a Fox News reporter asked Biden if he still feels the allegations against his son Hunter are ‘disinformation’. After laughing and starting to walk away, Biden called the Fox News reporter a ‘one horse pony’:
Joe Biden laughs when Fox News' Peter Doocy asks if he still thinks the allegations against Hunter Biden are Russian disinformation: "Yes, yes, yes. God love you, man. You're a one horse pony." pic.twitter.com/x8HEvPjpFn — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) December 22, 2020
What exactly is a ‘one horse pony’? I heard of a ‘one trick pony’, but never a ‘one horse pony’. Does a pony ride a horse?
Well, it wasn’t the teleprompter that got Biden this time, it was his own brain.
Biden claims his Justice Department will be independent, but just like Obama, you can expect he’ll have his henchmen in there getting rid of his dirty work. Of that I have no doubt.


therightscoop--2020-12-22--Sidney Powell says White House officials BLOCKING her from seeing Trump

Sidney Powell hasn ’ t been able to see President Trump since last Friday and she says it ’ s because White House officials are blocking her from seeing Trump : DC EXAMINER – Sidney Powell says she is being strong-armed away from President Trump by top White House officials .
The attorney , who has filed several unsuccessful “ Kraken ” lawsuits challenging the election results in battleground states , said she has been barred from seeing the president following an Oval Office meeting on Friday during which the president floated appointing Powell as special counsel to investigate allegations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ involved Trump personal attorney Rudy Giuliani , White House chief of staff Mark Meadows , White House counsel Pat Cipollone , and former White House national security adviser Michael Flynn , Powell ’ s client who was recently pardoned by Trump .
At times it got heated , with occasional bouts of shouting , and Meadows and Cipollone strongly opposed some of the ideas being put forth , according to the New York Times .
Powell was spotted visiting the White House over the weekend and on Monday , but , as she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ able to get face time with Trump since that tense meeting .
Powell shared a statement with the Washington Examiner on Tuesday in which she said Trump is not getting the support he needs in challenging the election , claimed she was trying to “ educate ” Giuliani of her claims of foreign election interference after he said on Newsmax on Monday she doesn ’ t represent the president , and denied that she has spoken to Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe , who recently delayed the release of an assessment on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s role in the matter .
“ I haven ’ t met or spoken with the President since Friday night .
The President knows this election was stolen but he is not getting the support he , the Constitution , and the Republic deserve .
His own people are misleading and undermining him while protecting their own careers and agendas , ” Powell said .
“ I haven ’ t spoken with the DNI on these issues at all , ” she added .
“ My efforts to educate Rudy on demonstrable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CISA and FBI findings have been met with irrational hostility .
I have been blocked by White House counsel and others from seeing or speaking to the President since I raised the public formal findings and even more evidence of the foreign interference from IRAN and CHINA in this election.
” “ What are they all trying to hide ?
American elections are supposed to be easily auditable and transparent , ” Powell continued .
“ That ’ s why Federal law punishes the failure to keep all records for 22 months with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is important not only to the United States but to the world .
There is no way of hiding this fraud and ‘ moving on ’ as if any election could ever be trusted again .
Our entire government seems to have become a big lie and coverup .
The American people are 100 % fed up with it .
”

Sidney Powell hasn’t been able to see President Trump since last Friday and she says it’s because White House officials are blocking her from seeing Trump:
DC EXAMINER – Sidney Powell says she is being strong-armed away from President Trump by top White House officials.
The attorney, who has filed several unsuccessful “Kraken” lawsuits challenging the election results in battleground states, said she has been barred from seeing the president following an Oval Office meeting on Friday during which the president floated appointing Powell as special counsel to investigate allegations of voting fraud.
That meeting also involved Trump personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, White House counsel Pat Cipollone, and former White House national security adviser Michael Flynn, Powell’s client who was recently pardoned by Trump. At times it got heated, with occasional bouts of shouting, and Meadows and Cipollone strongly opposed some of the ideas being put forth, according to the New York Times.
Powell was spotted visiting the White House over the weekend and on Monday, but, as she would tell it, has not been able to get face time with Trump since that tense meeting. Powell shared a statement with the Washington Examiner on Tuesday in which she said Trump is not getting the support he needs in challenging the election, claimed she was trying to “educate” Giuliani of her claims of foreign election interference after he said on Newsmax on Monday she doesn’t represent the president, and denied that she has spoken to Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, who recently delayed the release of an assessment on foreign meddling over a debate on China’s role in the matter.
“I haven’t met or spoken with the President since Friday night. The President knows this election was stolen but he is not getting the support he, the Constitution, and the Republic deserve. His own people are misleading and undermining him while protecting their own careers and agendas,” Powell said.
“I haven’t spoken with the DNI on these issues at all,” she added. “My efforts to educate Rudy on demonstrable foreign interference in the election including multiple CISA and FBI findings have been met with irrational hostility. I have been blocked by White House counsel and others from seeing or speaking to the President since I raised the public formal findings and even more evidence of the foreign interference from IRAN and CHINA in this election.”
“What are they all trying to hide? American elections are supposed to be easily auditable and transparent,” Powell continued. “That’s why Federal law punishes the failure to keep all records for 22 months with up to one year in prison. This is important not only to the United States but to the world. There is no way of hiding this fraud and ‘moving on’ as if any election could ever be trusted again. Our entire government seems to have become a big lie and coverup. The American people are 100% fed up with it.”


therightscoop--2020-12-22--Lindsey Graham says if you don’t like what they just passed, “see what happens” if Republicans lose

Lindsey Graham says if you don’t like what they just passed, “see what happens” if Republicans lose Senate

Lindsey Graham hit back at critics today who don ’ t like the funding bills they just passed for COVID relief and the Omnibus spending bill , saying it will be so much more worse if Republicans lose the Senate : Sen. Lindsey Graham hit back Tuesday at conservative critics of Congress ’ new coronavirus stimulus package , warning what would happen if Republicans lose next month ’ s Georgia Senate elections .
“ The bottom line is they wanted $ 3 trillion for the pandemic last year .
We wound up with $ 900 billion .
You could have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ McConnell ’ s right about that .
They refused to even talk to us before the election because they thought a relief package would help President Trump .
If you think this bill is bad , lose Georgia and see what happens , ” Graham , R-S.C. , told “ Fox & Friends.
” Graham said that $ 1.4 trillion will be allocated to funding the government and $ 680 billion will be allocated to the military .
“ Then you ’ ve got to fund the FBI , Department of Homeland Security @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % of all American spending .
Pakistan is a place I really worry about ; 85 countries a woman can ’ t open up a bank account without her husband ’ s signature , she can ’ t inherit property .
If you ’ re a young girl in Pakistan , life is pretty tough , so we ’ re trying to make life better for women throughout the world.
” Graham said that the United States has to “ compete with China ” because they are everywhere.
” He also said that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the sense that it is targeted.
” A family of four will get $ 2,400 and small businesses are eligible to get another round of Paycheck Protection Program loans , while $ 38 billion will go to distributing the vaccine , he explained .
“ So this is sausage making , but the Democrats have a say .
They run the House .
And if they ever get the House , the Senate and the White House , it will be a financial disaster for this country , so vote in Georgia.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but a lot of consolation this is when Republicans control both the Senate and the Presidency and we ’ re still getting massive spending bills .
We got them when Democrats controlled the Presidency and the Senate and we get them now when their in ‘ our ’ hands .
There are several reasons for that , with a big one that Democrats are protected by their media thugs .
But we all remember when Republicans controlled all three and still couldn ’ t repeal Obamacare .
Lindsey ’ s not wrong that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Senate .
But when we ’ re spending like we ’ ve spent this year already , how much worse can it get ?

Lindsey Graham hit back at critics today who don’t like the funding bills they just passed for COVID relief and the Omnibus spending bill, saying it will be so much more worse if Republicans lose the Senate:
Watch the latest video at foxnews.com
Here’s more from Fox News:
Sen. Lindsey Graham hit back Tuesday at conservative critics of Congress’ new coronavirus stimulus package, warning what would happen if Republicans lose next month’s Georgia Senate elections. “The bottom line is they wanted $3 trillion for the pandemic last year. We wound up with $900 billion. You could have gotten this package in July, Mitch McConnell’s right about that. They refused to even talk to us before the election because they thought a relief package would help President Trump. If you think this bill is bad, lose Georgia and see what happens,” Graham, R-S.C., told “Fox & Friends.” Graham said that $1.4 trillion will be allocated to funding the government and $680 billion will be allocated to the military. “Then you’ve got to fund the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, the foreign aid budget is 1% of all American spending. Pakistan is a place I really worry about; 85 countries a woman can’t open up a bank account without her husband’s signature, she can’t inherit property. If you’re a young girl in Pakistan, life is pretty tough, so we’re trying to make life better for women throughout the world.”
Graham said that the United States has to “compete with China” because they are everywhere.” He also said that he likes the coronavirus package “in the sense that it is targeted.” A family of four will get $2,400 and small businesses are eligible to get another round of Paycheck Protection Program loans, while $38 billion will go to distributing the vaccine, he explained. “So this is sausage making, but the Democrats have a say. They run the House. And if they ever get the House, the Senate and the White House, it will be a financial disaster for this country, so vote in Georgia.”
He’s not necessarily wrong, but a lot of consolation this is when Republicans control both the Senate and the Presidency and we’re still getting massive spending bills. We got them when Democrats controlled the Presidency and the Senate and we get them now when their in ‘our’ hands. There are several reasons for that, with a big one that Democrats are protected by their media thugs. But we all remember when Republicans controlled all three and still couldn’t repeal Obamacare.
Lindsey’s not wrong that it will get worse if we lose the Senate. But when we’re spending like we’ve spent this year already, how much worse can it get?