therightscoop--2020-09-29--STUNT: Biden just released one year of tax returns before the debate

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris just released last year ’ s tax returns before tonight ’ s debate : FOX @ @ @ @ @ Joe Biden ’ s campaign on Tuesday released 2019 tax returns for Biden and running @ @ @ @ @ on President Trump to release his own , hours before Biden and Trump are set @ @ @ @ @ first presidential debate .
It marked the latest jab in a heated battle between the @ @ @ @ @ , the Trump campaign called for a new ground rule establishing a third-party monitor to @ @ @ @ @ debate , a request the Biden team denied .
This is really all just a @ @ @ @ @ put more pressure on Trump to release his taxes .
That ’ s all this @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s just one year ’ s worth of taxes while both of them @ @ @ @ @ trying to win the Democratic primary .
I ’ m not sure it really tells @ @ @ @ @

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris just released last year’s tax returns before tonight’s debate:
FOX NEWS – Former Vice President Joe Biden’s campaign on Tuesday released 2019 tax returns for Biden and running mate Kamala Harris, calling on President Trump to release his own, hours before Biden and Trump are set to face off in the first presidential debate. It marked the latest jab in a heated battle between the two campaigns. Hours earlier, the Trump campaign called for a new ground rule establishing a third-party monitor to check for earpieces during the debate, a request the Biden team denied.
Here’s more:
#BREAKING: Vice President Joe Biden and Dr. Jill Biden have released their 2019 tax returns. The Biden’s total income in 2019 was $944,737. They paid $346,204 in taxes with a refund of $46,858. pic.twitter.com/azmB96Rz7s — Travis Akers (@travisakers) September 29, 2020
This is really all just a pre-debate stunt to try and put more pressure on Trump to release his taxes. That’s all this is about. Also, it’s just one year’s worth of taxes while both of them were on the campaign trail trying to win the Democratic primary. I’m not sure it really tells us all that much.


therightscoop--2020-09-29--TONIGHT’S DEBATE: Trump campaign pushing for both candidates to be inspected for electronic devices

TONIGHT’S DEBATE: Trump campaign pushing for both candidates to be inspected for electronic devices [UPDATE: TEAM BIDEN DENIES]

Team Trump is smartly pushing for both candidates to have their ears inspected for electronic devices ahead of tonight ’ s debate : Fox News has learned that the president ’ s re-election campaign wants the Biden campaign to allow a third party to inspect the ears of each debater for electronic devices or transmitters .
The president has consented to this kind of inspection , but Biden has not , so far , sources said .
Biden has exhibited very suspicious behavior recently , enough to warrant this kind of check before the debate tonight .
I ’ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they better make a big scene out of this if Biden refuses .
UPDATE : Apparently Biden agreed to this but has now changed his mind and refuses to have his ears checked : If this is true Trump better make a huge stink out of this .
They can not allow cheating at tonight ’ s debate !
UPDATE II : Trump ’ s campaign just put out this statement : UPDATE III : Team Biden says all of this is lies : Biden ’ s campaign has also been pushing for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 90 minute debate : Over the last several weeks , the former vice president ’ s campaign has also requested two breaks — one every 30 minutes — to break up the 90-minute commercial-free program .
But that request has been denied by their Trump counterparts , Fox News is told .
A Trump campaign source told Fox News that “ our guy doesn ’ t need breaks .
He gives 90-minute speeches all the time.
” While these breaks may have to do with Biden ’ s fatigue , I think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden trying to help Biden cheat than anything else .
Team Trump did the right thing in rejecting them .
After all , if Biden can ’ t go for 90 minutes without cheater breaks , he doesn ’ t deserve to be president .
Since my original theory didn ’ t pan out of Biden coming down with a fake case of COVID to get out of debating Trump , I ’ m starting to think now that he might fake a heart attack during tonight ’ s debate when the questions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stuff .
Afterward they ’ ll say it was just a case of angina and that he ’ ll be fine .
I know , it ’ s pretty far fetched .
But given Biden ’ s obvious mental struggles ( and that ’ s putting it nicely ) and the fact that his campaign feels the need to request two 30 minute breaks , I don ’ t think it ’ s outside of the realm of possibility .
What do you think ?

Team Trump is smartly pushing for both candidates to have their ears inspected for electronic devices ahead of tonight’s debate:
Fox News has learned that the president’s re-election campaign wants the Biden campaign to allow a third party to inspect the ears of each debater for electronic devices or transmitters. The president has consented to this kind of inspection, but Biden has not, so far, sources said.
Biden has exhibited very suspicious behavior recently, enough to warrant this kind of check before the debate tonight. I’m glad Trump is pushing for it and they better make a big scene out of this if Biden refuses.
UPDATE: Apparently Biden agreed to this but has now changed his mind and refuses to have his ears checked:
🚨🚨 BREAKING 🚨 🚨@JoeBiden agreed to an inspection for electronic ear pieces at #Debates2020 BUT now he is reversing course, declining the inspection! ⬇ https://t.co/hdn53Or1Wp — Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) September 29, 2020
If this is true Trump better make a huge stink out of this. They cannot allow cheating at tonight’s debate!
UPDATE II: Trump’s campaign just put out this statement:
UPDATE III: Team Biden says all of this is lies:
The Biden campaign says this is false and has also denied reporting that they asked for breaks during the debate. — Ebony Bowden (@ebonybowden) September 29, 2020
end update – – –
Biden’s campaign has also been pushing for at least two 30 minute breaks during the 90 minute debate:
Over the last several weeks, the former vice president’s campaign has also requested two breaks — one every 30 minutes — to break up the 90-minute commercial-free program. But that request has been denied by their Trump counterparts, Fox News is told. A Trump campaign source told Fox News that “our guy doesn’t need breaks. He gives 90-minute speeches all the time.”
While these breaks may have to do with Biden’s fatigue, I think they have more to do with Team Biden trying to help Biden cheat than anything else. Team Trump did the right thing in rejecting them. After all, if Biden can’t go for 90 minutes without cheater breaks, he doesn’t deserve to be president.
Since my original theory didn’t pan out of Biden coming down with a fake case of COVID to get out of debating Trump, I’m starting to think now that he might fake a heart attack during tonight’s debate when the questions get tough or he starts to forget stuff. Afterward they’ll say it was just a case of angina and that he’ll be fine. I know, it’s pretty far fetched. But given Biden’s obvious mental struggles (and that’s putting it nicely) and the fact that his campaign feels the need to request two 30 minute breaks, I don’t think it’s outside of the realm of possibility. What do you think?


therightscoop--2020-09-29--REPORT: There will be no interim report from John Durham before the election

At some point this year AG Barr suggested that there would be , at the very least , an interim report on John Durham ’ s investigation because people are owed the truth of what really happened as the FBI and other agencies began their coup against President Trump .
But Maria Bartiromo is now reporting that there won ’ t be a report out before the election : She reported this on Sunday morning and it comes at the very beginning of the video above .
Bartiromo says that she ’ s hearing from sources that there ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are now too close to the election to release any report about the investigation and that a report won ’ t be coming .
She does report that Durham ’ s investigation is expanding and it ’ s significant , but that ’ s about it .
Which is really a shame because I agreed with Barr that people deserved to know the specifics of what happened in 2016 and 2017 .
And I ’ m disappointed that , assuming this report is true , that there won ’ t be a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ responded to Bartiromo ’ s reporting this morning and called it disgusting : I understand Don Jr. ’ s frustrations because I share them .
I don ’ t agree that Barr is just running out the clock though and I wouldn ’ t accuse Durham of this either .
I just think the investigation is too big and Durham is trying to be very thorough in order to make sure they can prove their case in the courts .
Because this is the crime of the century and it deserves a robust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I truly hope this reporting is wrong and Barr does issue some kind of report in the coming weeks that , at the very least , lays out the basics of this unprecedented attack on Trump .
But I ’ m not going to hold my breath .

At some point this year AG Barr suggested that there would be, at the very least, an interim report on John Durham’s investigation because people are owed the truth of what really happened as the FBI and other agencies began their coup against President Trump. But Maria Bartiromo is now reporting that there won’t be a report out before the election:
She reported this on Sunday morning and it comes at the very beginning of the video above. Bartiromo says that she’s hearing from sources that there’s a huge debate at the DOJ that they are now too close to the election to release any report about the investigation and that a report won’t be coming.
She does report that Durham’s investigation is expanding and it’s significant, but that’s about it. Which is really a shame because I agreed with Barr that people deserved to know the specifics of what happened in 2016 and 2017. And I’m disappointed that, assuming this report is true, that there won’t be a report before the election.
Don Jr. responded to Bartiromo’s reporting this morning and called it disgusting:
"I assume he's just running out clock and being part of big government, protecting institutions"@DonaldJTrumpJr reacts to reporting by @MariaBartiromo that there likely won't be a report or more indictments in John Durham's inquiry before the electionhttps://t.co/hTQCL9t6MV pic.twitter.com/HtYWN2D6HU — Daniel Chaitin (@danielchaitin7) September 29, 2020
I understand Don Jr.’s frustrations because I share them. I don’t agree that Barr is just running out the clock though and I wouldn’t accuse Durham of this either. I just think the investigation is too big and Durham is trying to be very thorough in order to make sure they can prove their case in the courts. Because this is the crime of the century and it deserves a robust and thorough investigation.
All that said, I truly hope this reporting is wrong and Barr does issue some kind of report in the coming weeks that, at the very least, lays out the basics of this unprecedented attack on Trump. But I’m not going to hold my breath.


therightscoop--2020-09-30--President Trump’s first debate performance was terrible

I really don ’ t like having to dump on President Trump because I feel like he ’ s been a solid president and one that I will absolutely vote for in November .
But his debate performance tonight was terrible .
Sure , he had some good responses and one-liners against Biden .
But it was almost all overshadowed by how much of a bully he was for the entire debate .
Trump continually interrupted Biden , refusing to let him answer , and even interrupted Chris Wallace when he was asking questions .
I know there ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ getting and some of it is well deserved .
He completely let Biden off the hook for flat out refusing to give an answer on packing the Supreme Court .
And when Trump put Biden on the spot about which law enforcement groups support him , Wallace just ended that line of questioning and moved on .
But overall , I felt like Wallace had his hands full just trying to get Trump to stop interrupting every time Biden said something .
Honestly , Trump ’ s continually bullying and belligerent attitude made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m certain it won ’ t play well with independents in battleground states who are still trying to figure out which candidate to support .
I think one of the biggest problems from Trump ’ s performance tonight is that it confirms what many people don ’ t like about Trump .
They don ’ t like his personality , his angry tweets , and how he insults and attacks people on twitter and even those in his own administration .
Tonight that ’ s exactly what they saw on stage .
There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just struck me as mean spirited from Trump .
It was when he was attacking Biden for using the word ‘ smart ’ .
“ There ’ s nothing smart about you Joe.
” It wasn ’ t solely what Trump said , but the way he said it .
Honestly , he came off as a condescending prick in that moment .
I ’ m sorry , but I just think he handled that very badly .
Look , I don ’ t mean to leave Biden out .
He said some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him a racist .
That ’ s deplorable .
But I really feel like at the end of the day , what people will remember from this debate is that Trump was a relentless bully , and I think that has Biden feeling pretty good right now .
There are still two more debates unless Team Biden cancels them .
That ’ s what I think will happen .
Why would Biden want to give Trump a chance to redeem himself ?

I really don’t like having to dump on President Trump because I feel like he’s been a solid president and one that I will absolutely vote for in November. But his debate performance tonight was terrible.
Sure, he had some good responses and one-liners against Biden. But it was almost all overshadowed by how much of a bully he was for the entire debate. Trump continually interrupted Biden, refusing to let him answer, and even interrupted Chris Wallace when he was asking questions.
I know there’s a lot of criticism that Wallace is getting and some of it is well deserved. He completely let Biden off the hook for flat out refusing to give an answer on packing the Supreme Court. And when Trump put Biden on the spot about which law enforcement groups support him, Wallace just ended that line of questioning and moved on.
But overall, I felt like Wallace had his hands full just trying to get Trump to stop interrupting every time Biden said something. Honestly, Trump’s continually bullying and belligerent attitude made the debate nearly unwatchable and I’m certain it won’t play well with independents in battleground states who are still trying to figure out which candidate to support.
I think one of the biggest problems from Trump’s performance tonight is that it confirms what many people don’t like about Trump. They don’t like his personality, his angry tweets, and how he insults and attacks people on twitter and even those in his own administration. Tonight that’s exactly what they saw on stage.
There was one moment in the debate that just struck me as mean spirited from Trump. It was when he was attacking Biden for using the word ‘smart’.
TRUMP: “There’s nothing smart about you Joe” 🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/ne8nuRLmy4 — Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 30, 2020
“There’s nothing smart about you Joe.” It wasn’t solely what Trump said, but the way he said it. Honestly, he came off as a condescending prick in that moment. I’m sorry, but I just think he handled that very badly.
Look, I don’t mean to leave Biden out. He said some awful things to Trump, including calling him a racist. That’s deplorable. But I really feel like at the end of the day, what people will remember from this debate is that Trump was a relentless bully, and I think that has Biden feeling pretty good right now.
There are still two more debates unless Team Biden cancels them. That’s what I think will happen. Why would Biden want to give Trump a chance to redeem himself?


therightscoop--2020-09-30--Trump brutalizes Biden for the coup on his presidency  – [VIDEO]

I will be posting multiple clips from tonight ’ s debate here so please check back frequently for more videos : In a really strong moment , Trump brutalizes Biden for his and Obama ’ s the attack on his presidency that started during his 2016 transition : Biden tried to use the false report of Trump insulting military members against him , but Trump went savage and turned it right back around on him : Trump puts Biden on the spot , asks him to name any law enforcement agency backing him and he can ’ t : Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ call top officials in Portland and Oregon to call the National Guard and end the violence in Portland : Joe Biden refuses to condemn Antifa or even admit they exist : Trump calls out Biden on China and his son Hunter Biden making millions off him being Vice President : Here ’ s the line of the night from Trump : Trump tells Biden there ’ s nothing smart about him : Joe Biden claims Roe vs Wade “ is on the ballot ” at the Supreme Court , but Trump points out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Joe Biden flat out refuses to answer whether he ’ ll pack the court if he wins the election : Trump to Wallace : “ First of all I guess I ’ m debating you not him ” : Trump explains why he has the right to nominate a new Supreme Court justice : Trump came out swinging tonight and hammered Biden for denying that his party is socialist and telling him point blank that they are going to dominate him :

I will be posting multiple clips from tonight’s debate here so please check back frequently for more videos:
In a really strong moment, Trump brutalizes Biden for his and Obama’s the attack on his presidency that started during his 2016 transition:
President Trump calls out Joe Biden: "You gave the idea of the Logan Act for General Flynn." pic.twitter.com/nz0ThKnuDs — Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 30, 2020
Biden tried to use the false report of Trump insulting military members against him, but Trump went savage and turned it right back around on him:
Joe Biden is using an anonymously sourced report to hit Trump on the military meanwhile there’s a video of Biden calling troops “stupid bastards” Trump went savage mode pic.twitter.com/ACwTNeKzYm — Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 30, 2020
Trump puts Biden on the spot, asks him to name any law enforcement agency backing him and he can’t:
President Trump to Joe Biden: "Name one law enforcement group that came out to support you." Chris Wallace takes back the time. pic.twitter.com/F88TGOuFnu — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) September 30, 2020
Biden gives a lame excuse for refusing on call top officials in Portland and Oregon to call the National Guard and end the violence in Portland:
Joe Biden refuses to call on the mayor of Portland to call in the National Guard pic.twitter.com/4h85EiOQBj — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 30, 2020
Joe Biden refuses to condemn Antifa or even admit they exist:
Trump explains why Critical Race Theory is bad:
Trump absolutely obliterated this question about the supposed amazingness of critical race theory, which teaches people to literally hate themselves and, for people like myself with mental health demons, it can lead us to having — hmm — very bad thoughts about whether we matter pic.twitter.com/ilocLLEq2t — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 30, 2020
Trump calls out Biden on China and his son Hunter Biden making millions off him being Vice President:
TRUMP: "China ate your lunch, Joe. And it's no wonder. Your son made millions of dollars with China. And the mayor of Moscow's wife gave your son $3.5 million." pic.twitter.com/0cjDkoZCfV — Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 30, 2020
Here’s the line of the night from Trump:
This was a good line from the president: Done more in 47 months than Biden's 47 years. pic.twitter.com/vyJRA0gdm5 — Joe Pounder (@PounderFile) September 30, 2020
Trump mocks Biden’s small rallies:
Chris Wallace: "Vice President Biden, you are holding much smaller events with…" Trump: "Because nobody would show up. It’s true, nobody shows up to his rallies." pic.twitter.com/pJ3P7BHvAw — Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) September 30, 2020
Trump tells Biden there’s nothing smart about him:
TRUMP: “There’s nothing smart about you Joe” 🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/ne8nuRLmy4 — Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 30, 2020
Joe Biden claims Roe vs Wade “is on the ballot” at the Supreme Court, but Trump points out that isn’t true at all:
"It's not on the ballot. There's nothing happening there. You don't know her view on Roe v. Wade."@realDonaldTrump challenges @JoeBiden's assertion that Roe v. Wade is "on the ballot." pic.twitter.com/CqPcjFgE4U — Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) September 30, 2020
Joe Biden flat out refuses to answer whether he’ll pack the court if he wins the election:
Trump's right. Joe won't answer whether he'd pack the court and end the filibuster. Candidates are candidates and they're supposed to, you know, take positions on things. Him ducking this shows how he is not "the Democratic Party"#Debates2020 pic.twitter.com/HK2TPokq2m — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 30, 2020
Trump to Wallace: “First of all I guess I’m debating you not him”:
Trump to Wallace: “First of all I guess I’m debating you not him”. pic.twitter.com/wrbOJrLXMP — Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 30, 2020
Trump explains why he has the right to nominate a new Supreme Court justice:
TRUMP ON SCOTUS NOMINATION: “Elections have consequences” pic.twitter.com/0Io7ilBkF4 — Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 30, 2020
Trump came out swinging tonight and hammered Biden for denying that his party is socialist and telling him point blank that they are going to dominate him:
Biden on Dems’ leftward lurch: “The party is me” "I am the Democratic Party right now. The platform of the Democratic Party is what I, in fact approve of, what I approved of." pic.twitter.com/0kfXaFM1lj — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 30, 2020


therightscoop--2020-09-30--WATCH LIVE: Trump holds campaign rally in Minnesota at 9PM, but it’s already begun!

President Trump is holding a big campaign rally in Duluth , Minnesota tonight at 9PM ET ( 8PM locally ) @ @ @ @ @ below .
It ’ s already live with different speakers if you want to watch @ @

President Trump is holding a big campaign rally in Duluth, Minnesota tonight at 9PM ET (8PM locally) and you can watch it below. It’s already live with different speakers if you want to watch now:
RSB:
TMC:
FOX NEWS:
PBS NEWSHOUR:


therightscoop--2020-09-30--[AUDIO] – Cuomo DENIES that he made nursing homes take back COVID patients

The despicable governor of New York , Andrew Cuomo , is now denying that he made nursing homes take back COVID positive patients at the beginning of the pandemic : Cuomo literally says this in an interview with Finger Lakes Daily News : “ So it just never happened in New York , where we needed to say to a nursing home we need you to take this person even though they are covid positive .
It never happened.
” He goes on to claim that they had extra beds in emergency hospitals they put up all across the state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happened.
” It ’ s a complete , bold-faced lie by the New York State governor and here ’ s the proof that he did exactly what he claimed he didn ’ t do : It was his policy !
It even has his name on the top of this document from the New York Department of Health .
How he can deny this with a straight face , after thousands of nursing home patients died because of his policy , is unfathomable .
I don ’ t have audio of this , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the interview : Imagine being a family member of one of those seniors who passed away because of his reckless policy , and then you hear him deny it like this ?
It ’ s appalling .
New Yorkers should line up outside his office and force him to resign for denying the deaths of thousands of people that he caused .
And then the DOJ should bury him under the jail for his reckless policy that led to all these deaths .

The despicable governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, is now denying that he made nursing homes take back COVID positive patients at the beginning of the pandemic:
Cuomo tells Finger Lakes Daily News that COVID patients were never sent to nursing homes “It never happened” pic.twitter.com/JssBVNqg7n — Jewish Deplorable 🇺🇸 (@TrumpJew) September 30, 2020
Cuomo literally says this in an interview with Finger Lakes Daily News: “So it just never happened in New York, where we needed to say to a nursing home we need you to take this person even though they are covid positive. It never happened.”
He goes on to claim that they had extra beds in emergency hospitals they put up all across the state and says again “it just never happened.”
It’s a complete, bold-faced lie by the New York State governor and here’s the proof that he did exactly what he claimed he didn’t do:
It was his policy! It even has his name on the top of this document from the New York Department of Health.
How he can deny this with a straight face, after thousands of nursing home patients died because of his policy, is unfathomable.
I don’t have audio of this, but Cuomo also reportedly said this in the interview:
"I put my head on the pillow at night saying I saved lives." – Gov Andrew Cuomo. — Zach Williams (@ZachReports) September 30, 2020
Imagine being a family member of one of those seniors who passed away because of his reckless policy, and then you hear him deny it like this? It’s appalling.
New Yorkers should line up outside his office and force him to resign for denying the deaths of thousands of people that he caused. And then the DOJ should bury him under the jail for his reckless policy that led to all these deaths.


therightscoop--2020-09-30--Ex-con arrested and charged for attempted murder of two Compton sheriff deputies

The man who shot two sheriff deputies as they sat in their car on September 12th has been arrested and charged with the ambush and attempted murder of these two deputies : ABC 7 – An ex-con arrested earlier this month in connection to a carjacking in Lynwood was charged Wednesday with attempted murder in the ambush shooting of two Los Angeles County sheriff ’ s deputies who were critically wounded while sitting in their patrol car near a Metro station in Compton .
The suspect , identified as 36-year-old Deonte Lee Murray , is set to be arraigned Wednesday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ each of attempted murder of a peace officer and possession of a firearm by a felon in connection with the Sept. 12 attack on the deputies .
He had already been charged Sept. 17 with one felony count each of carjacking , second-degree robbery and assault with a semi-automatic firearm — along with gang and gun allegations — involving a Sept. 1 carjacking in Compton , in which he allegedly shot a 51-year-old man in the leg with a high-powered rifle and stole his black Mercedes-Benz .
He pleaded not guilty to those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his Sept. 15 arrest .
Murray , who authorities say is associated with multiple gangs , could face a potential life prison term if convicted of the charges , District Attorney Jackie Lacey .
Sheriff ’ s Homicide Bureau Capt .
Kent Wegener , who detailed the investigation , did not suggest a specific motive for the attack “ other than the fact that he obviously hates policemen and he wants them dead.
” Murray allegedly fled the scene of the deputies ’ shooting in the stolen black sedan and discarded a pistol @ @ @ @ @ @ @ investigators prior to a standoff in Lynwood , according to Wegener .
The pistol was the same one that had been used to shoot the sheriff ’ s deputies in Compton and was “ conclusively linked through forensic testing ” to Murray , he said .
At the time , Sheriff Alex Villanueva told multiple media outlets that there was no connection between the ambush of the deputies and the carjacking suspect , who was arrested after a chase and standoff that ended in Lynwood .
Investigators initially had no evidence that Murray @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and possession of narcotics , firearm possession by a felon or addict , receiving stolen property , burglary and terrorist threats — was responsible for the attack on the deputies , according to Wegener .
“ We knew that he was a violent offender , was accused of stealing a black Mercedes-Benz and lived in the area .
However , there was insufficient evidence to support an arrest , much less a criminal filing for the charge of attempted murder on a peace officer and to label him in the media as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s homicide captain said .

The man who shot two sheriff deputies as they sat in their car on September 12th has been arrested and charged with the ambush and attempted murder of these two deputies:
ABC 7 – An ex-con arrested earlier this month in connection to a carjacking in Lynwood was charged Wednesday with attempted murder in the ambush shooting of two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were critically wounded while sitting in their patrol car near a Metro station in Compton.
The suspect, identified as 36-year-old Deonte Lee Murray, is set to be arraigned Wednesday at the Compton courthouse on two counts each of attempted murder of a peace officer and possession of a firearm by a felon in connection with the Sept. 12 attack on the deputies.
He had already been charged Sept. 17 with one felony count each of carjacking, second-degree robbery and assault with a semi-automatic firearm — along with gang and gun allegations — involving a Sept. 1 carjacking in Compton, in which he allegedly shot a 51-year-old man in the leg with a high-powered rifle and stole his black Mercedes-Benz. He pleaded not guilty to those charges and has remained behind bars since his Sept. 15 arrest.
Murray, who authorities say is associated with multiple gangs, could face a potential life prison term if convicted of the charges, District Attorney Jackie Lacey. Sheriff’s Homicide Bureau Capt. Kent Wegener, who detailed the investigation, did not suggest a specific motive for the attack “other than the fact that he obviously hates policemen and he wants them dead.”
Murray allegedly fled the scene of the deputies’ shooting in the stolen black sedan and discarded a pistol while being pursued by sheriff’s investigators prior to a standoff in Lynwood, according to Wegener. The pistol was the same one that had been used to shoot the sheriff’s deputies in Compton and was “conclusively linked through forensic testing” to Murray, he said.
At the time, Sheriff Alex Villanueva told multiple media outlets that there was no connection between the ambush of the deputies and the carjacking suspect, who was arrested after a chase and standoff that ended in Lynwood.
Investigators initially had no evidence that Murray — who has prior convictions for sales and possession of narcotics, firearm possession by a felon or addict, receiving stolen property, burglary and terrorist threats — was responsible for the attack on the deputies, according to Wegener.
“We knew that he was a violent offender, was accused of stealing a black Mercedes-Benz and lived in the area. However, there was insufficient evidence to support an arrest, much less a criminal filing for the charge of attempted murder on a peace officer and to label him in the media as the person responsible,” the sheriff’s homicide captain said.


therightscoop--2020-09-30--The ratings for last night’s debate are IN and Trump is extremely happy with them…

It was reported earlier today that last night ’ s debate ratings were abysmal compared to 2016 , but those were just preliminary numbers .
The ratings were actually much higher than initially reported : CNN MONEY – More than 65 million people watched the first debate between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden Tuesday night .
The television audience for the debate was down from the first debate between Trump and Hillary Clinton in 2016 , but it was higher than almost every other debate in recent years .
Tuesday ’ s clash was the biggest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bowl last February .
Preliminary Nielsen ratings showed an average audience of roughly 64.7 million viewers across eight channels for the entirety of Tuesday ’ s prime time event .
The preliminary ratings include only Americans who watched at home on television .
An unknown number of people live-streamed the debate on the internet , listened on the radio , and watched in other ways , which means the total audience easily surpassed 65 million .
Finalized Nielsen TV ratings figures are set to be released later in the day on Wednesday .

It was reported earlier today that last night’s debate ratings were abysmal compared to 2016, but those were just preliminary numbers. The ratings were actually much higher than initially reported:
CNN MONEY – More than 65 million people watched the first debate between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden Tuesday night.
The television audience for the debate was down from the first debate between Trump and Hillary Clinton in 2016, but it was higher than almost every other debate in recent years.
Tuesday’s clash was the biggest event on American TV since the Super Bowl last February.
Preliminary Nielsen ratings showed an average audience of roughly 64.7 million viewers across eight channels for the entirety of Tuesday’s prime time event.
The preliminary ratings include only Americans who watched at home on television. An unknown number of people live-streamed the debate on the internet, listened on the radio, and watched in other ways, which means the total audience easily surpassed 65 million.
Finalized Nielsen TV ratings figures are set to be released later in the day on Wednesday.


therightscoop--2020-09-30--Brianna Keilar flips out AGAIN, tells Black man he’s ‘saying a bunch of crap’, orders him to pipe do

Brianna Keilar flips out AGAIN, tells Black man he’s ‘saying a bunch of crap’, orders him to pipe down so she can EXPLAIN race to him

Apparently CNN ’ s Brianna Keilar doesn ’ t like Black Americans talking back to her any more than she tolerates it when women do .
How else can you interpret this insane display from this afternoon on CNN ?
Speaking with T.W .
Shannon , who is co-chair of Black Voices for Trump and himself a Black man , Keilar scolded him , treated him like he was stupid , insulted him , and then insulted him again to end the segment .
It ’ s truly an appalling display .
Watch if you can stand to .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , of course , but also it was totally haughty superiority .
“ Let ME explain to YOU ” she commanded .
“ You ’ re not listening , ” she scolded .
It ’ s unbelievable but totally the standard at CNN now .
“ I wish I could say it was a pleasure having you on.
” Man did I think of some words in my head I can ’ t say out loud just then .
Y ’ all I really can ’ t even pick a part to pick @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of crap , ” to use the words Keilar is so fond of saying to women and minorities .
I did like how Shannon pointed out she was interrupting and talking over him , just like CNN has been complaining all day about Trump doing last night .

Apparently CNN’s Brianna Keilar doesn’t like Black Americans talking back to her any more than she tolerates it when women do.
How else can you interpret this insane display from this afternoon on CNN? Speaking with T.W. Shannon, who is co-chair of Black Voices for Trump and himself a Black man, Keilar scolded him, treated him like he was stupid, insulted him, and then insulted him again to end the segment.
It’s truly an appalling display. Watch if you can stand to. It could not be more condescending or snotty, of course, but also it was totally haughty superiority. “Let ME explain to YOU” she commanded. “You’re not listening,” she scolded.
It’s unbelievable but totally the standard at CNN now.
“I wish I could say it was a pleasure having you on.” Man did I think of some words in my head I can’t say out loud just then.
Y’all I really can’t even pick a part to pick apart. It was “a bunch of crap,” to use the words Keilar is so fond of saying to women and minorities.
I did like how Shannon pointed out she was interrupting and talking over him, just like CNN has been complaining all day about Trump doing last night.
Total s-word show.


therightscoop--2020-09-30--Tim Scott asked about Trump ‘white supremacist’ debate response, his answer made EVERYONE even MORE

Tim Scott asked about Trump ‘white supremacist’ debate response, his answer made EVERYONE even MORE angry

President Trump ’ s reply to the Chris Wallace/Joe Biden dynamic duo ’ s “ guess the number I ’ m thinking of and then denounce it ” challenge about “ white supremacist ” groups has been the number one social media whipping horse for the left/media all day .
The line is that Trump “ refuses ” to “ denounce ” the white supremacy that he ’ s previously denounced many , many , many times , because when Walliden asked him last night if he would denounce it , and he said yes , they then said “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Stand back and stand by.
” It ’ s a whole thing .
And so they asked Tim Scott about it of course because he is black and that ’ s how the left thinks .
Watch .
“ I think he misspoke in response to Chris Wallace ’ s comment .
He was asking Chris what he wanted to say .
I think he misspoke .
I think he should correct it .
If he doesn ’ t correct it , I guess he didn ’ t misspeak.
” I don @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thought that was a fine political answer .
He didn ’ t bash , he didn ’ t make it about himself , he didn ’ t speak FOR Trump .
Pretty careful for an on-the-spot question unrelated to what they were there for .
But on social media the reaction was totally not that .
On the right , he ’ s being bashed over it for saying Trump should correct it .
On the left , he ’ s being bashed for saying it was just a matter of misspeaking .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the left were much worse and nastier and more racist .
For the record , here ’ s the part that ’ s in question .
I don ’ t know exactly what Trump was saying here .
Seems like it would have been a lot easier to say “ yes I denounce the Proud Boys.
” Still , he seemed willing to play the denounce game , which is more than it deserves most times .
Trump has repeatedly asked for Biden to condemn Antifa , as Chris Wallace says .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wallace had asked for Biden to do that , don ’ t ya think ?
I mean there it was , right there in the moment .
He said “ you ’ ve asked Biden to denounce ” and then he and Biden both pushed Trump on Proud Boys .
All Wallace had to so say next was “ now Mr. Vice President , will you likewise denounce Antifa by name ?
” Or at least have called BS on that little “ antifa is an idea ” speech .
After all , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supremacists every 12 minutes , in order to keep tying him to the words “ white supremacist ” in searches and headlines .
UPDATE : Trump just answered a question on this subject as he headed to Marine One .
“ They have to stand down and let law enforcement do their work , ” he said , expanding on his comment from the debate stage .

President Trump’s reply to the Chris Wallace/Joe Biden dynamic duo’s “guess the number I’m thinking of and then denounce it” challenge about “white supremacist” groups has been the number one social media whipping horse for the left/media all day.
The line is that Trump “refuses” to “denounce” the white supremacy that he’s previously denounced many, many, many times, because when Walliden asked him last night if he would denounce it, and he said yes, they then said “Proud Boys” and he cryptically said “Stand back and stand by.”
It’s a whole thing. And so they asked Tim Scott about it of course because he is black and that’s how the left thinks. Watch.
“I think he misspoke in response to Chris Wallace’s comment. He was asking Chris what he wanted to say. I think he misspoke. I think he should correct it. If he doesn’t correct it, I guess he didn’t misspeak.”
I don’t know y’all I thought that was a fine political answer. He didn’t bash, he didn’t make it about himself, he didn’t speak FOR Trump. Pretty careful for an on-the-spot question unrelated to what they were there for.
But on social media the reaction was totally not that.
On the right, he’s being bashed over it for saying Trump should correct it. On the left, he’s being bashed for saying it was just a matter of misspeaking. As you can expect, the ones on the left were much worse and nastier and more racist.
For the record, here’s the part that’s in question.
I don’t know exactly what Trump was saying here. Seems like it would have been a lot easier to say “yes I denounce the Proud Boys.” Still, he seemed willing to play the denounce game, which is more than it deserves most times.
Trump has repeatedly asked for Biden to condemn Antifa, as Chris Wallace says.
Course it woulda been real nice if Wallace had asked for Biden to do that, don’t ya think? I mean there it was, right there in the moment. He said “you’ve asked Biden to denounce” and then he and Biden both pushed Trump on Proud Boys. All Wallace had to so say next was “now Mr. Vice President, will you likewise denounce Antifa by name?” Or at least have called BS on that little “antifa is an idea” speech.
After all, Biden and friends demand Trump denounce white supremacists every 12 minutes, in order to keep tying him to the words “white supremacist” in searches and headlines.
UPDATE: Trump just answered a question on this subject as he headed to Marine One.
BREAKING: “They have to stand down and let law enforcement do their work,” Trump says of Proud Boys, adding “I don’t know who the Proud Boys are.” pic.twitter.com/1Odm4zGrOJ — Jennifer Jacobs (@JenniferJJacobs) September 30, 2020
“They have to stand down and let law enforcement do their work,” he said, expanding on his comment from the debate stage.


therightscoop--2020-09-30--WATCH: Sen. Mike Lee SCORCHES James Comey for still speculating about Trump and Putin in epic video

An impassioned Senator Mike Lee just scorched James Comey in this morning ’ s judiciary hearing for still suggesting that Trump has inappropriate ties to Putin when he doesn ’ t seem to know anything about the Russia collusion investigation he ran : '' How can you now as a private citizen and former FBI Director show up and then speculate freely regarding any alleged ties between President Putin and President Trump… You do n't seem to know ANYTHING about this investigation that you ran . ''
pic.twitter.com/fOnr4M2J2I Now Mr. Comey , with all due respect , you don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ investigation that you ran !
So how can you now , as a private citizen and a former FBI director , show up and then speculate freely regarding any alleged ties between President Putin and President Trump ?
…I think I heard you say that you still speculate they may have something on President Trump because of how President Trump refers or doesn ’ t refer to President Putin in public .
This of course takes into account NOTHING about the fact that sources you ’ ve relied on in the past have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you didn ’ t identify the inaccuracies subsequently to the FISA court .
It acknowledges nothing about the fact that there are perfectly reasonable explanations as to why one leader would refer to a foreign leader in a certain tone .
Or the fact that this is the same tone he uses when referring to other world leaders , particularly those world leaders in parts of the country where we ’ ve had some issues .
So honestly , how can you as a private citizen now come to us , and in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and speculate so freely regarding these alleged ties when you don ’ t seem to know ANYTHING about this investigation that you ran ?

An impassioned Senator Mike Lee just scorched James Comey in this morning’s judiciary hearing for still suggesting that Trump has inappropriate ties to Putin when he doesn’t seem to know anything about the Russia collusion investigation he ran:
"How can you now as a private citizen and former FBI Director show up and then speculate freely regarding any alleged ties between President Putin and President Trump… You don't seem to know ANYTHING about this investigation that you ran." pic.twitter.com/fOnr4M2J2I
Here’s what Lee said:
Now Mr. Comey, with all due respect, you don’t seem to know ANYTHING about an investigation that you ran! So how can you now, as a private citizen and a former FBI director, show up and then speculate freely regarding any alleged ties between President Putin and President Trump? …I think I heard you say that you still speculate they may have something on President Trump because of how President Trump refers or doesn’t refer to President Putin in public.
This of course takes into account NOTHING about the fact that sources you’ve relied on in the past have turned out not to be accurate; you didn’t identify the inaccuracies subsequently to the FISA court. It acknowledges nothing about the fact that there are perfectly reasonable explanations as to why one leader would refer to a foreign leader in a certain tone. Or the fact that this is the same tone he uses when referring to other world leaders, particularly those world leaders in parts of the country where we’ve had some issues.
So honestly, how can you as a private citizen now come to us, and in your capacity as former FBI director, and speculate so freely regarding these alleged ties when you don’t seem to know ANYTHING about this investigation that you ran?


therightscoop--2020-09-30--Was Joe Biden wearing a wire during last night’s debate?

There ’ s a video going around from last night ’ s debate showing ‘ proof ’ that Joe Biden is wearing a wire : Even James Woods posted the same video : The problem is that it ’ s not really a wire , it ’ s a crease in his shirt .
The low quality video from the man who recorded doesn ’ t show it very well .
I found the moment in the actual video and you can see for yourself : Go ahead and make it full screen and you ’ ll see it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as he pulls his hand out .
The man who recorded the video above , alleging this to be a wire , actually says “ why do you need a wire bro ?
You got a mic.
” That ’ s a great question .
Why would he need a wire ?
A ‘ wire ’ is typically used to record someone surreptitiously , or it could represent a hidden microphone – neither of which would be useful in a debate .
What most were concerned about was Biden using a hidden receiver @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anyone hearing it , but that would need to be in his ear .
My point is that this doesn ’ t logically follow .
Now there is another item that people are speculating about and it ’ s something sticking out of his cuff : At first glance I didn ’ t know what this was , but someone found a photo of Biden ’ s arm and he ’ s wearing a rosary around his wrist in honor of his late son : If you look back at the first picture @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his wrist in that photo as well .

There’s a video going around from last night’s debate showing ‘proof’ that Joe Biden is wearing a wire:
Even James Woods posted the same video:
The problem is that it’s not really a wire, it’s a crease in his shirt. The low quality video from the man who recorded doesn’t show it very well. I found the moment in the actual video and you can see for yourself:
Go ahead and make it full screen and you’ll see it’s just a crease in his shirt as he pulls his hand out.
Here’s a larger photo of the crease:
The man who recorded the video above, alleging this to be a wire, actually says “why do you need a wire bro? You got a mic.” That’s a great question. Why would he need a wire? A ‘wire’ is typically used to record someone surreptitiously, or it could represent a hidden microphone – neither of which would be useful in a debate. What most were concerned about was Biden using a hidden receiver where someone could talk to him without anyone hearing it, but that would need to be in his ear. My point is that this doesn’t logically follow.
Now there is another item that people are speculating about and it’s something sticking out of his cuff:
At first glance I didn’t know what this was, but someone found a photo of Biden’s arm and he’s wearing a rosary around his wrist in honor of his late son:
If you look back at the first picture, you can see the rosary around his wrist in that photo as well.


therightscoop--2020-09-30--WATCH LIVE: James Comey testifies before Lindsey Graham’s Judiciary Committee investigating Crossfir

WATCH LIVE: James Comey testifies before Lindsey Graham’s Judiciary Committee investigating Crossfire Hurricane

Lindsey Graham is holding a judiciary hearing this morning called Oversight of the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation and James Comey is @ @ @ @ @ began at 10AM and you can watch below :

Lindsey Graham is holding a judiciary hearing this morning called Oversight of the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation and James Comey is his only witness. It began at 10AM and you can watch below:
FOX NEWS:
PBS NEWSHOUR:
FOX BUSINESS:


therightscoop--2020-09-30--WATCH: MSM tries to push Biden into canceling all the debates

After the debate last night many in the media were repeatedly pushing Biden to cancel the rest of the debates @ @ @ @ @ know where the media stands , but they didn ’ t get their wish .
@ @ @ @ @ that he ’ ll do the rest of the debates : One of the top @ @ @ @ @ s campaign wasted little time late Tuesday to confirm that the former vice president has @ @ @ @ @ final two debates before the November election .
Kate Bedingfield , the deputy campaign manager @ @ @ @ @ would skip the final two showdowns .
Her remarks came after Sen. Chris Coons , @ @ @ @ @ he was not sure that Biden should make the commitment .
Coons , a Biden @ @ @ @ @ would leave the decision to the campaign , but he questioned the effectiveness of debates @ @ @ @ @ Trump .
So apparently Biden didn ’ t get the message and is going through @ @ @ @ @ be interesting !

After the debate last night many in the media were repeatedly pushing Biden to cancel the rest of the debates:
SUPERCUT! Media urge Biden: Just say no to more debates! pic.twitter.com/EUgtwbYidC — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 30, 2020
Well I guess we know where the media stands, but they didn’t get their wish.
Team Biden has already indicated that he’ll do the rest of the debates:
One of the top officials for Joe Biden’s campaign wasted little time late Tuesday to confirm that the former vice president has committed to participating in the final two debates before the November election. Kate Bedingfield, the deputy campaign manager, dismissed claims that he would skip the final two showdowns. Her remarks came after Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., told Politico that he was not sure that Biden should make the commitment. Coons, a Biden supporter, said that he would leave the decision to the campaign, but he questioned the effectiveness of debates for candidates facing off against Trump.
So apparently Biden didn’t get the message and is going through with the debates. Should be interesting!


therightscoop--2020-10-02--BREAKING: Trump just condemned White Supremacists AGAIN and here’s the audio

Trump was just on Hannity a few minutes ago where he unequivocally denounced White Supremacists , just like he ’ s done in the past : As you can see from the tweet , Trump says “ Let me be clear again , I condemn the KKK .
I condemn all white supremacists .
I condemn the Proud Boys .
I don ’ t know much about the Proud Boys , almost nothing , but I condemn that.
” Now what I found interesting , and incredibly predictable , is that so far the big MSM news companies are ignoring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ MSM news companies on Twitter and so far none of them have tweeted about this or tweeted this audio .
I ’ ve seen a few reporters here and there , but mostly it ’ s people on the right .
And I guarantee you when they do report on it , they ’ ll brush it off as him waiting two days to condemn them or something .
Nothing Trump does will ever make these haters happy , because their sole goal in life is to help kick him out of the @ @ @

Trump was just on Hannity a few minutes ago where he unequivocally denounced White Supremacists, just like he’s done in the past:
"Let me be clear again, I condemn the KKK. I condemn all white supremacists. I condemn the Proud Boys."@realDonaldTrump reaffirms his denouncement of white supremacy, including a condemnation of the Proud Boys. pic.twitter.com/wuUroNtQGB — Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) October 2, 2020
As you can see from the tweet, Trump says “Let me be clear again, I condemn the KKK. I condemn all white supremacists. I condemn the Proud Boys. I don’t know much about the Proud Boys, almost nothing, but I condemn that.”
Now what I found interesting, and incredibly predictable, is that so far the big MSM news companies are ignoring it. I follow all the major MSM news companies on Twitter and so far none of them have tweeted about this or tweeted this audio. I’ve seen a few reporters here and there, but mostly it’s people on the right.
And I guarantee you when they do report on it, they’ll brush it off as him waiting two days to condemn them or something. Nothing Trump does will ever make these haters happy, because their sole goal in life is to help kick him out of the White House.


therightscoop--2020-10-02--Trump gets HIGHEST approval rating from Gallup

President Trump has just gotten his highest approval rating from Gallup in their latest poll , which took place before Tuesday night ’ s debate : FOX NEWS – A poll conducted in the lead-up to Tuesday ’ s presidential debate showed Americans giving President Trump his highest approval rating in months while a majority predicted he would defeat former Vice President Joe Biden in November .
Gallup released its results on Thursday , claiming that Trump saw his highest approval rating ( 46 % ) since May with approvals on his handling of certain issues , other than the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data , which was gathered in the two weeks before the debate , reflected an uptick from the 42 % Trump received earlier in September .
That increase , the polling company suggested , could be associated with his response to late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ’ s death .
“ Although the increase of four percentage points in Trump ’ s latest rating is not statistically significant , the poll ’ s internals suggest a rise in his support the second half of the Sept. 14-28 field period coincident with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and lying in state , as well as Trump ’ s announcing that he would quickly make a nomination to the Supreme Court .
This suggests that some viewed his handling of the situation positively , ” a press release from Gallup reads .

President Trump has just gotten his highest approval rating from Gallup in their latest poll, which took place before Tuesday night’s debate:
FOX NEWS – A poll conducted in the lead-up to Tuesday’s presidential debate showed Americans giving President Trump his highest approval rating in months while a majority predicted he would defeat former Vice President Joe Biden in November.
Gallup released its results on Thursday, claiming that Trump saw his highest approval rating (46%) since May with approvals on his handling of certain issues, other than the economy, below 50%.
The data, which was gathered in the two weeks before the debate, reflected an uptick from the 42% Trump received earlier in September. That increase, the polling company suggested, could be associated with his response to late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death.
“Although the increase of four percentage points in Trump’s latest rating is not statistically significant, the poll’s internals suggest a rise in his support the second half of the Sept. 14-28 field period coincident with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death and lying in state, as well as Trump’s announcing that he would quickly make a nomination to the Supreme Court. This suggests that some viewed his handling of the situation positively,” a press release from Gallup reads.


therightscoop--2020-10-01--Democrats reaching HARD to try and delegitimize Judge Amy Coney Barrett and they just got help from

Democrats reaching HARD to try and delegitimize Judge Amy Coney Barrett and they just got help from NBC News

Democrats , along with NBC News , are trying to scandalize Judge Amy Coney Barrett by claiming she didn ’ t disclose her support for overturning Roe v. Wade in a newspaper ad back in 2006 , long before she was a judge : NBC NEWS – President Donald Trump ’ s Supreme Court nominee , Judge Amy Coney Barrett , failed to disclose her participation in a 2006 newspaper ad calling for Roe v. Wade to be overturned and ending its “ barbaric legacy ” when she submitted paperwork to the Senate Judiciary Committee .
Two Democratic committee aides @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ad published in the South Bend Tribune , which included her name in a long list of those in support , was not disclosed in the Senate forms required of judicial nominees but maintain it should have been .
They say it should have been included in the response to a question in those forms asking for citations of “ books , articles , reports , letters to the editor , editorial pieces or other published material you have written or edited.
” “ The ad should have been included in Judge Barrett @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not , ” one of the two aides said , asking not to be named in order to speak freely about the questionnaire .
The aide also said that Barrett did not include her participation in the ad in her Senate disclosures for her 2017 circuit court appointment .
Barrett ’ s support for the ad , and her failure to report it , was first reported in The Guardian .
It ’ s always about abortion when it comes to Trump nominees .
Democrats are so scared that Roe v. Wade is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so they create phony scandals like this attacking her legitimacy to try and sway Senate RINOs from voting for Barrett .
The White House says that Democrats are wrong , that there is nothing to this : They aren ’ t the only one .
A former Chief Counsel for Nominations to the Senate Judiciary under Chuck Grassley says this is just nonsense : National Review said this about the ad : In 2006 , long before she was a judge , Amy Barrett agreed to let her name appear with many of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the statement , “ We , the following citizens of Michiana , oppose abortion on demand and support the right to life from fertilization to natural death.
” The insert was placed by St. Joseph County Right to Life .
It appeared next to anti-Roe v. Wade commentary from the organization , but signatories were asked only to approve the statement .
SHOCKER !
A Catholic woman opposing abortion !
Just another attack on her faith .
Christopher Scalia actually posted the question on the disclosure form and it ’ s exactly as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s nothing to this , but expect Schumer and his Democrat minions to make as much hay about this as the can and the Democrat media , like NBC News , to help them push this phony story .

Democrats, along with NBC News, are trying to scandalize Judge Amy Coney Barrett by claiming she didn’t disclose her support for overturning Roe v. Wade in a newspaper ad back in 2006, long before she was a judge:
NBC NEWS – President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, failed to disclose her participation in a 2006 newspaper ad calling for Roe v. Wade to be overturned and ending its “barbaric legacy” when she submitted paperwork to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Two Democratic committee aides confirm to NBC News that the two-page ad published in the South Bend Tribune, which included her name in a long list of those in support, was not disclosed in the Senate forms required of judicial nominees but maintain it should have been. They say it should have been included in the response to a question in those forms asking for citations of “books, articles, reports, letters to the editor, editorial pieces or other published material you have written or edited.” “The ad should have been included in Judge Barrett’s Senate Judiciary Questionnaire and was not,” one of the two aides said, asking not to be named in order to speak freely about the questionnaire. The aide also said that Barrett did not include her participation in the ad in her Senate disclosures for her 2017 circuit court appointment. Barrett’s support for the ad, and her failure to report it, was first reported in The Guardian.
It’s always about abortion when it comes to Trump nominees. Democrats are so scared that Roe v. Wade is on the way to being overturned, so they create phony scandals like this attacking her legitimacy to try and sway Senate RINOs from voting for Barrett.
The White House says that Democrats are wrong, that there is nothing to this:
A White House spokesman said that because Barrett did not write or edit the advertisement, it does not fall within the scope of the questionnaire.
The Committee's questionnaire requires disclosure of material that a candidate has "written or edited." Judge Barrett neither wrote nor edited the ad in question. This reporter's (and Dem aides') suggestion that ACB did something improper on her questionnaire is false. https://t.co/hQRzCbu2dk — Ben Williamson (@_WilliamsonBen) October 1, 2020
They aren’t the only one. A former Chief Counsel for Nominations to the Senate Judiciary under Chuck Grassley says this is just nonsense:
More nonsense. I served as the chief counsel for nominations on @senjudiciary. Judge Barrett isn’t required to submit this public ad, as it’s *not responsive* to the Senate Judiciary Questionnaire. And this public ad is *already* publicly disclosed. That’s the point of an ad. https://t.co/5JMmMs7mBX — 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) October 1, 2020
National Review said this about the ad:
In 2006, long before she was a judge, Amy Barrett agreed to let her name appear with many of her neighbors in a newspaper insert under the statement, “We, the following citizens of Michiana, oppose abortion on demand and support the right to life from fertilization to natural death.” The insert was placed by St. Joseph County Right to Life. It appeared next to anti-Roe v. Wade commentary from the organization, but signatories were asked only to approve the statement.
SHOCKER! A Catholic woman opposing abortion! Just another attack on her faith.
Christopher Scalia actually posted the question on the disclosure form and it’s exactly as the White House says:
One of the many great things about originalists is that they understand what the words "written" and "edited" mean. https://t.co/w5VFyLmxgf pic.twitter.com/hyH98OiMy1 — Christopher J. Scalia (@cjscalia) October 1, 2020
Clearly there’s nothing to this, but expect Schumer and his Democrat minions to make as much hay about this as the can and the Democrat media, like NBC News, to help them push this phony story.


therightscoop--2020-10-01--Ted Cruz has the ANSWER for all our debate woes!

Ted Cruz tweeted today the answer to all our debate woes and its actually a pretty good idea : I like it a lot and it seems fair , which is why I know it ’ ll never happen .
But even if it did I could still see problems , at least in the GOP primary debates because we still have divisions within the GOP .
We ’ d need to have a moderate and conservative moderator to ‘ solve ’ that one too .
But overall I think it ’ s a great idea .
In the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 2nd debate is a former Biden intern and staffer to Teddy Kennedy .
Here ’ s more on that from Daily Wire : The second presidential debate , scheduled for October 15 , will be moderated by Steve Scully , the political editor at C-SPAN and host of Washington Journal , who once worked as an intern for Senator Joe Biden in college , later working as a staff assistant in Sen. Edward M. Kennedy ’ s communication office .
“ While attending college , he served as an intern in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and later a staff assistant in Sen. Edward M. Kennedy ’ s media affairs office , ” Utah Valley University noted .
In an interview with Journalism Jobs in May 2011 , when he was asked , “ Has the quality of broadcast journalism decreased over the past five years ?
” , Scully took the opportunity to rip Fox News , stating , “ I think what has gone downhill is when cable networks get caught in all the titillating news of the day when they should be focusing more on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , like following the money and the state of the nation .
Having said that , if you ’ re sick and tired of watching Laci Peterson on the Fox News Channel , then you can come on to C-SPAN and understand the process that we do in following it.
” I ’ m not convinced that Skully will do a poor job because he has an ‘ impartial ’ C-SPAN reputation to uphold .
But I am concerned about him , especially after C-SPAN changed the phone lines on the last day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Biden and Trump supporter .
They did this , we assume , because they were getting so many Democrats calling in saying they were switching to vote for Republicans .

Ted Cruz tweeted today the answer to all our debate woes and its actually a pretty good idea:
1/x Everyone agrees Tuesday’s debate was a train wreck. A major contributing fact was the moderator Chris Wallace, a registered Democrat, repeatedly interrupting to try to help Joe Biden. The next debate is set to be moderated by a former intern to…Joe Biden. (And Ted Kennedy.) — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) October 1, 2020
2/x This is NUTS. And no Republican should allow this bias to continue in future elections. I propose 2 simple, fair rules for future debates: (1) GOP primary debates should be moderated by people who actually vote in a GOP primary. (Not Dem journalists who want GOP to lose.) — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) October 1, 2020
3/x And (2) General election debates should be moderated by an equal number of GOP and Dems. We should stop pretending obvious bias doesn’t exist. Instead, equalize & counter-balance it. A debate moderated by, say Mark Levin & Chris Hayes would be better than fake impartiality. — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) October 1, 2020
4/x Or Rush Limbaugh & Rachel Maddow. Or Ben Shapiro & Chris Cuomo. Both sides would take incoming & the debates would be real and substantive. — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) October 1, 2020
I like it a lot and it seems fair, which is why I know it’ll never happen. But even if it did I could still see problems, at least in the GOP primary debates because we still have divisions within the GOP. We’d need to have a moderate and conservative moderator to ‘solve’ that one too. But overall I think it’s a great idea.
In the first tweet Trump mentioned that the moderator of the 2nd debate is a former Biden intern and staffer to Teddy Kennedy. Here’s more on that from Daily Wire:
The second presidential debate, scheduled for October 15, will be moderated by Steve Scully, the political editor at C-SPAN and host of Washington Journal, who once worked as an intern for Senator Joe Biden in college, later working as a staff assistant in Sen. Edward M. Kennedy’s communication office. “While attending college, he served as an intern in the office of Delaware Sen. Joseph R. Biden, and later a staff assistant in Sen. Edward M. Kennedy’s media affairs office,” Utah Valley University noted. In an interview with Journalism Jobs in May 2011, when he was asked, “Has the quality of broadcast journalism decreased over the past five years?”, Scully took the opportunity to rip Fox News, stating, “I think what has gone downhill is when cable networks get caught in all the titillating news of the day when they should be focusing more on the things that are important to people, like following the money and the state of the nation. Having said that, if you’re sick and tired of watching Laci Peterson on the Fox News Channel, then you can come on to C-SPAN and understand the process that we do in following it.”
I’m not convinced that Skully will do a poor job because he has an ‘impartial’ C-SPAN reputation to uphold. But I am concerned about him, especially after C-SPAN changed the phone lines on the last day of the RNC from Republican and Democrat to Biden and Trump supporter. They did this, we assume, because they were getting so many Democrats calling in saying they were switching to vote for Republicans.


therightscoop--2020-10-01--Wife of Boston Marathon bombing HERO cop accuses Biden of INAPPROPRIATELY TOUCHING her, will CNN eve

Wife of Boston Marathon bombing HERO cop accuses Biden of INAPPROPRIATELY TOUCHING her, will CNN even report it?

Kim Donohue ’ s name has not been mentioned on CNN .
And it probably won ’ t be .
Julie Swetnick , the Avenatti stooge who made fake accusations of gang rape about Bret Kavanaugh got acres of CNN air time , along with the rest of the national media .
But Kim Donohue , a credible law enforcement spouse making a thoroughly believable accusation in keeping with the character and behavior of the public figure she is accusing ?
Yeah don ’ t hold your breath for Chris Cuomo and the Fat , Dumb , and Bald Guy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Washington Examiner reports on Donohue ’ s allegation and her background .
The wife of a Massachusetts transit police officer who was injured in the manhunt for the Boston Marathon bombers accused Joe Biden of touching her inappropriately and making a suggestive comment in 2014 .
In two Facebook posts , one of which has since been deleted , Kim Donohue alleged that during a remembrance ceremony in Boston , a year after the April 2013 deadly bombing , then-Vice President Biden began “ rubbing ” her lower back .
“ Look at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those eyes ?
” Donohue wrote .
“ Anyone else as good looking as you in that family … those eyes are mesmerizing , people must just do whatever you say.
” In a separate post , this one made in July 2016 , Donohue reiterated her claim that Biden “ greeted me by rubbing my back in an inappropriate and uncomfortable way ” then “ pushed ” her husband , Dic Donohue , who was shot in the leg by one of the Tsarnaev brothers , aside .
“ Biden then asked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ car with him down to a ceremony we were all attending at the Marathon finish line , ” Donohue wrote in her posts .
There is a lot more from the Examiner here .
Those 2016 posts were not politically motivated , obviously .
She posted them in July .
Biden had already endorsed Hillary by JUNE .
And she ’ s voting for Biden ( or against Trump if you prefer ) this time , too .
That means she wasn ’ t playing for political partisans .
Will CNN report it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is # MeToo only for certain people ?

Kim Donohue’s name has not been mentioned on CNN. And it probably won’t be. Julie Swetnick, the Avenatti stooge who made fake accusations of gang rape about Bret Kavanaugh got acres of CNN air time, along with the rest of the national media. But Kim Donohue, a credible law enforcement spouse making a thoroughly believable accusation in keeping with the character and behavior of the public figure she is accusing?
Yeah don’t hold your breath for Chris Cuomo and the Fat, Dumb, and Bald Guy to put that on air.
The Washington Examiner reports on Donohue’s allegation and her background.
The wife of a Massachusetts transit police officer who was injured in the manhunt for the Boston Marathon bombers accused Joe Biden of touching her inappropriately and making a suggestive comment in 2014. In two Facebook posts, one of which has since been deleted, Kim Donohue alleged that during a remembrance ceremony in Boston, a year after the April 2013 deadly bombing, then-Vice President Biden began “rubbing” her lower back. “Look at those eyes, where did you get those eyes?” Donohue wrote. “Anyone else as good looking as you in that family … those eyes are mesmerizing, people must just do whatever you say.” In a separate post, this one made in July 2016, Donohue reiterated her claim that Biden “greeted me by rubbing my back in an inappropriate and uncomfortable way” then “pushed” her husband, Dic Donohue, who was shot in the leg by one of the Tsarnaev brothers, aside.
“Biden then asked if I wanted to ride in a car with him down to a ceremony we were all attending at the Marathon finish line,” Donohue wrote in her posts. There is a lot more from the Examiner here.
Those 2016 posts were not politically motivated, obviously. She posted them in July. Biden had already endorsed Hillary by JUNE.
And she’s voting for Biden (or against Trump if you prefer) this time, too. That means she wasn’t playing for political partisans.
Will CNN report it like they did for Kavanaugh? Or is #MeToo only for certain people?


therightscoop--2020-10-01--The media want to change the DEFINITION of RIOT to accommodate BLM and Antifa rioting.

The AP Stylebook announced a new change that is in keeping with the national press/propaganda networks who are conspiring to hide , cover for , support financially , and benefit from the deadly and destructive anti-American hate riots put on by domestic terror groups Black Lives Matter and Antifa .
The Stylebook tweeted their intent out loud this week because the media believe , maybe correctly , that they control everything and are accountable to no one .
Just like every time the trial balloon goes up , they pretend it ’ s a suggestion .
That ’ s how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they suggest , then they insist , then they come to a restaurant while you ’ re eating and demand you raise your fist in solidarity or face punishment .
WHICH behavior , by the way , the AP doesn ’ t think should be criticized with mean words like “ riot.
” “ The term riot suggests uncontrolled chaos and pandemonium.
” Okay .
Right .
I mean I agree it ’ s not “ uncontrolled ” in the sense of “ unplanned ” or “ uncoordinated ” , but in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control , it CLEARLY applies to each riot we ’ ve seen this year , which is a LOT .
“ Focusing on rioting and property destruction rather than underlying grievance has been used in the past to stigmatize.. ” blah blah .
As soon as a leftist org like the AP says “ in the past ” you KNOW they are selling smoke and calling it dinner .
Let ’ s shorten that last one to its actual message .
“ Violence is protest.
” “ Revolt and uprising both suggest a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a sustained period of protests or unrest against powerful groups or governing systems.
” Uh , where ’ s the lie ?
Riots as part of a revolt against America .
That ’ s exactly what we said , y ’ all .

The AP Stylebook announced a new change that is in keeping with the national press/propaganda networks who are conspiring to hide, cover for, support financially, and benefit from the deadly and destructive anti-American hate riots put on by domestic terror groups Black Lives Matter and Antifa.
The Stylebook tweeted their intent out loud this week because the media believe, maybe correctly, that they control everything and are accountable to no one.
Just like every time the trial balloon goes up, they pretend it’s a suggestion. That’s how the left always does things. First they suggest, then they insist, then they come to a restaurant while you’re eating and demand you raise your fist in solidarity or face punishment.
WHICH behavior, by the way, the AP doesn’t think should be criticized with mean words like “riot.”
New guidance on AP Stylebook Online: Use care in deciding which term best applies:
A riot is a wild or violent disturbance of the peace involving a group of people. The term riot suggests uncontrolled chaos and pandemonium. (1/5) — APStylebook (@APStylebook) September 30, 2020
“The term riot suggests uncontrolled chaos and pandemonium.” Okay. Right. I mean I agree it’s not “uncontrolled” in the sense of “unplanned” or “uncoordinated”, but in the literal sense of chaotic and out of control, it CLEARLY applies to each riot we’ve seen this year, which is a LOT.
Focusing on rioting and property destruction rather than underlying grievance has been used in the past to stigmatize broad swaths of people protesting against lynching, police brutality or for racial justice, going back to the urban uprisings of the 1960s. (2/5) — APStylebook (@APStylebook) September 30, 2020
“Focusing on rioting and property destruction rather than underlying grievance has been used in the past to stigmatize..” blah blah. As soon as a leftist org like the AP says “in the past” you KNOW they are selling smoke and calling it dinner.
Unrest is a vaguer, milder and less emotional term for a condition of angry discontent and protest verging on revolt. (3/5) — APStylebook (@APStylebook) September 30, 2020
Protest and demonstration refer to specific actions such as marches, sit-ins, rallies or other actions meant to register dissent. They can be legal or illegal, organized or spontaneous, peaceful or violent, and involve any number of people. (4/5) — APStylebook (@APStylebook) September 30, 2020
Let’s shorten that last one to its actual message. “Violence is protest.”
Revolt and uprising both suggest a broader political dimension or civil upheavals, a sustained period of protests or unrest against powerful groups or governing systems. (5/5) — APStylebook (@APStylebook) September 30, 2020
“Revolt and uprising both suggest a broader political dimension or civil upheavals, a sustained period of protests or unrest against powerful groups or governing systems.”
Uh, where’s the lie? Riots as part of a revolt against America. That’s exactly what we said, y’all.


therightscoop--2020-10-01--STUPID: Debate commission wants to give moderator ability to turn off microphones, but RNC says NOPE

Since Tuesday night ’ s debate , the commission that runs them is now wanting to give the moderator the ability to turn off a candidate ’ s microphone : NY POST – The presidential debate commission is considering giving the moderator the opportunity to cut a candidate ’ s mic at the next matchup between President Trump and Joe Biden , it was revealed Wednesday .
The debate commission announced that it will adopt changes in order to avoid a repeat of Tuesday night ’ s clash between the candidates , which has been referred to as a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” The Associated Press reported that one change being discussed is giving the moderator the ability to cut off the microphone of one of the debate participants while his opponent is talking .
This is a horrendous idea .
If they really want a debate to turn into a dumpster fire , start cutting microphones and see what happens .
The RNC and the Trump campaign is already dead set against the idea , and they should be : THE HILL – The Republican National Committee and Trump campaign are signaling they will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after the nonpartisan commission that manages the events said it is exploring potential adjustments following the chaotic contest in Cleveland .
Appearing on Fox News , Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel said that the commission should not make any adjustments without the support of both campaigns and that the rules should not be changed “ in the middle of the campaign , ” after both sides agreed to specific parameters .
McDaniel also suggested that the Commission on Presidential Debates was pursuing changes in order to assist Democratic nominee Joe Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ got away ” without answering tough questions at the first debate .
“ I hope the Committee on Presidential Debates does not change the rules to once again protect Joe Biden from answering to the American people , ” McDaniel said .
McDaniel indicated she does not support a change that would see either candidates ’ microphone cut off if they break the rules after President Trump repeatedly interrupted moderator Chris Wallace and Biden during Tuesday night ’ s debate .
“ I don ’ t think you should be changing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I do not think this commission has the right to just arbitrarily change rules without talking to both candidates and getting agreement and input from both sides , ” McDaniel said when asked if she would support such a change .
You all know that I wasn ’ t pleased with Trump ’ s bullying the other night , but the last thing I want to see is the moderator having the power to silence candidates .
If anything we need much less moderator and more back and forth between the candidates .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ without a moderator having too much control .
If they want to insist on turning off microphones , then both candidates need to bring a bull horn to make sure they are heard .
Then they ’ ll have a real dumpster fire of a debate .
😂😂😂

Since Tuesday night’s debate, the commission that runs them is now wanting to give the moderator the ability to turn off a candidate’s microphone:
NY POST – The presidential debate commission is considering giving the moderator the opportunity to cut a candidate’s mic at the next matchup between President Trump and Joe Biden, it was revealed Wednesday. The debate commission announced that it will adopt changes in order to avoid a repeat of Tuesday night’s clash between the candidates, which has been referred to as a “dumpster fire” and a “sh–storm.” The Associated Press reported that one change being discussed is giving the moderator the ability to cut off the microphone of one of the debate participants while his opponent is talking.
This is a horrendous idea. If they really want a debate to turn into a dumpster fire, start cutting microphones and see what happens.
The RNC and the Trump campaign is already dead set against the idea, and they should be:
THE HILL – The Republican National Committee and Trump campaign are signaling they will oppose changes to the presidential debate structure after the nonpartisan commission that manages the events said it is exploring potential adjustments following the chaotic contest in Cleveland. Appearing on Fox News, Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel said that the commission should not make any adjustments without the support of both campaigns and that the rules should not be changed “in the middle of the campaign,” after both sides agreed to specific parameters. McDaniel also suggested that the Commission on Presidential Debates was pursuing changes in order to assist Democratic nominee Joe Biden, arguing that the former vice president “got away” without answering tough questions at the first debate. “I hope the Committee on Presidential Debates does not change the rules to once again protect Joe Biden from answering to the American people,” McDaniel said. McDaniel indicated she does not support a change that would see either candidates’ microphone cut off if they break the rules after President Trump repeatedly interrupted moderator Chris Wallace and Biden during Tuesday night’s debate. “I don’t think you should be changing the rules that they have agreed to and I do not think this commission has the right to just arbitrarily change rules without talking to both candidates and getting agreement and input from both sides,” McDaniel said when asked if she would support such a change.
You all know that I wasn’t pleased with Trump’s bullying the other night, but the last thing I want to see is the moderator having the power to silence candidates. If anything we need much less moderator and more back and forth between the candidates. Whatever happens needs stand on its own without a moderator having too much control.
If they want to insist on turning off microphones, then both candidates need to bring a bull horn to make sure they are heard. Then they’ll have a real dumpster fire of a debate. 😂😂😂


therightscoop--2020-10-01--WATCH: Another Fox News reporter BECLOWNS himself in ridiculous exchange with Kayleigh McEnany

John Decker , a reporter who works for Fox News Radio , asked Kayleigh about Trump mentioning ballots that were found in a river .
Kayleigh explained that Trump was referring to a story where ballots in Wisconsin were found in a ditch : Even though Kayleigh clarified that Trump was referring to a ditch , the reporter persisted in asking “ Where specifically in this particular statement though , who is ‘ they ’ that found those ballots and where is this river anywhere in this country ?
” Is Decker on crack ?
Kayleigh just explained that Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but she dutifully answers his question again , saying “ The local authorities .
It was a ditch in Wisconsin that they were found and I can get you the article to your inbox if you like.
” Decker continued to press , saying “ …if the president misspoke that ’ s fine .
So he meant a ditch rather than a river ?
” Kayleigh hits back , telling Decker “ That ’ s what the president was referring to , and you ’ re really missing the forest for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wants to report the news accurately , and then continued saying “ When the president says ‘ they found a lot of ballots in a river ’ , I simply want to know where the river is.
” Kaleigh then starts hammering Decker , saying ‘ No you simply want to ignore the fact of the matter.
’ Decker tries to repeat his ridiculous justification for pressing on this , but Kayleigh continues : “ This is what is happening here .
You are ignoring the problem here , which is last week @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a ditch .
That is a fact .
In Wisconsin seven military ballots all marked for Trump were found cast aside .
There are problems with mass mail-in voting .
I actually don ’ t understand the lack of journalistic curiosity in reporting on this .
There used to be curiosity.
” Kayleigh continued to elaborate , but Decker started yelling over top of her saying , “ I ’ m asking you where the river is and you can ’ t give an answer .
If you say the president meant a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ditch .
I just want to know where the river is ?
” What an a-hole .
She has already said Trump was really referring to a ditch .
She ’ s said it multiple times .
What Decker is doing is trying to create a new narrative where the media can pit Kayleigh against Trump and create drama .
But she ’ s too smart for that and instead Decker ends up looking like a fool , an anti-Trump fool .

John Decker, a reporter who works for Fox News Radio, asked Kayleigh about Trump mentioning ballots that were found in a river. Kayleigh explained that Trump was referring to a story where ballots in Wisconsin were found in a ditch:
It’s clear that President Trump was referring to the story of Mail-in-ballots found in a ditch. The reporter doesn’t care, he’s just obsessed with the “river” What a stupid question. pic.twitter.com/wpoeCmJFn4 — Benny (@bennyjohnson) October 1, 2020
Even though Kayleigh clarified that Trump was referring to a ditch, the reporter persisted in asking “Where specifically in this particular statement though, who is ‘they’ that found those ballots and where is this river anywhere in this country?”
Is Decker on crack? Kayleigh just explained that Trump was referring to a ditch in Wisconsin, but she dutifully answers his question again, saying “The local authorities. It was a ditch in Wisconsin that they were found and I can get you the article to your inbox if you like.”
Decker continued to press, saying “…if the president misspoke that’s fine. So he meant a ditch rather than a river?”
Kayleigh hits back, telling Decker “That’s what the president was referring to, and you’re really missing the forest for the trees.”
Decker claimed that he just wants to report the news accurately, and then continued saying “When the president says ‘they found a lot of ballots in a river’, I simply want to know where the river is.”
Kaleigh then starts hammering Decker, saying ‘No you simply want to ignore the fact of the matter.’ Decker tries to repeat his ridiculous justification for pressing on this, but Kayleigh continues:
“This is what is happening here. You are ignoring the problem here, which is last week in Pennsylvania you had ballots found in a ditch. That is a fact. In Wisconsin seven military ballots all marked for Trump were found cast aside. There are problems with mass mail-in voting. I actually don’t understand the lack of journalistic curiosity in reporting on this. There used to be curiosity.”
Kayleigh continued to elaborate, but Decker started yelling over top of her saying, “I’m asking you where the river is and you can’t give an answer. If you say the president meant a ditch, then say he meant a ditch. I just want to know where the river is?”
What an a-hole. She has already said Trump was really referring to a ditch. She’s said it multiple times. What Decker is doing is trying to create a new narrative where the media can pit Kayleigh against Trump and create drama. But she’s too smart for that and instead Decker ends up looking like a fool, an anti-Trump fool.


therightscoop--2020-10-01--WATCH: Kayleigh McEnany schools Fox News reporter for pushing fake news on Trump not denouncing whit

WATCH: Kayleigh McEnany schools Fox News reporter for pushing fake news on Trump not denouncing white supremacists [UPDATE: Kayleigh just dropped a bomb on Roberts]

At the start of Kayleigh McEnany ’ s press briefing , Fox News reporter John Roberts started in with the false narrative that Trump won ’ t denounce white supremacism and pushed Kayleigh to make a definitive statement denouncing it : But Kayleigh quickly reminded Roberts of several different times where Trump clearly denounced white supremacism .
Roberts wasn ’ t happy with that and still pushed Kayleigh to denounce it , but she told him she just did by repeating Trump ’ s past statements denouncing it .
This is such a phony issue and one that the media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ posted a video of over 17 times where Trump denounced this garbage that the media keeps trying to pin on him by saying he ’ s never done it : AS you can see most of this is from 2016 .
But the media keeps pretending that Trump has never denounced any of it .
Here ’ s a CBS News report from 2019 entitled “ Trump denounces white supremacy after weekend of violence ” , where they say “ President Trump made his strongest denunciation yet of white supremacy after the mass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ These people are hypocrites !
Just like in 2016 , they are trying to scandalize Trump as a racist to keep him from winning .
It didn ’ t work then and it won ’ t work now because the American people see through these partisan hacks .
John Roberts went on Fox News and told people on Twitter , who are hammering him for asking this question , that he doesn ’ t care , claiming it needs to be asked : UPDATE : Kayleigh just dropped a bomb on John Roberts @ @ @

At the start of Kayleigh McEnany’s press briefing, Fox News reporter John Roberts started in with the false narrative that Trump won’t denounce white supremacism and pushed Kayleigh to make a definitive statement denouncing it:
.@PressSec blows the idea that President Trump hasn’t denounced White Supremacy out of the water. pic.twitter.com/DJ9PYV7FPo — Benny (@bennyjohnson) October 1, 2020
But Kayleigh quickly reminded Roberts of several different times where Trump clearly denounced white supremacism. Roberts wasn’t happy with that and still pushed Kayleigh to denounce it, but she told him she just did by repeating Trump’s past statements denouncing it.
This is such a phony issue and one that the media is obsessed with. Just yesterday someone posted a video of over 17 times where Trump denounced this garbage that the media keeps trying to pin on him by saying he’s never done it:
Here is a compilation of @realDonaldTrump condemning white supremacy at least 17 times. pic.twitter.com/nttX9vvVtw — James Klüg (@realJamesKlug) October 1, 2020
AS you can see most of this is from 2016. But the media keeps pretending that Trump has never denounced any of it.
Here’s a CBS News report from 2019 entitled “Trump denounces white supremacy after weekend of violence”, where they say “President Trump made his strongest denunciation yet of white supremacy after the mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton.”
These people are hypocrites! Just like in 2016, they are trying to scandalize Trump as a racist to keep him from winning. It didn’t work then and it won’t work now because the American people see through these partisan hacks.
John Roberts went on Fox News and told people on Twitter, who are hammering him for asking this question, that he doesn’t care, claiming it needs to be asked:
On Fox News, @johnrobertsFox is visibly angry that @PressSec won't offer a clear denunciation of white supremacy: "Stop deflecting. Stop blaming the media. I'm tired of it. " pic.twitter.com/GcPcOsAHqJ — Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) October 1, 2020
I’m very disappointed in Roberts.
UPDATE: Kayleigh just dropped a bomb on John Roberts from Twitter:
.@johnrobertsFox I would refer you to your wife’s reporting from 21 hours ago… accurate reporting I cited in the White House Press Briefing. https://t.co/dV3Hzp1UaI — Kayleigh McEnany (@PressSec) October 1, 2020


therightscoop--2020-10-01--WATCH LIVE: Kayleigh McEnany holds White House press briefing

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany is holding a White House press briefing at 11 AM and you can watch @ @ @

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany is holding a White House press briefing at 11 AM and you can watch it below:
WHITE HOUSE:
FOX NEWS:
PBS NEWSHOUR:
WHILE YOU WAIT:
.@JoeBiden predicted in 1991 that he would be "dead and gone" by 2020. pic.twitter.com/stSyvYuRbJ — Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) September 29, 2020
Watch this terrified dog become a total mama's boy 💗 pic.twitter.com/YBRaSLC7cJ — The Dodo (@dodo) October 1, 2020


therightscoop--2020-10-02--[UPDATE: STATEMENT FROM MELANIA] – BREAKING: President Trump and First Lady test positive for COVID-

[UPDATE: STATEMENT FROM MELANIA] – BREAKING: President Trump and First Lady test positive for COVID-19

President Trump just tweeted that he and First Lady Melania Trump have tested positive for COVID-19 : In case the @ @ @ @ @ up for you , it says “ Tonight , FLOTUS and I tested positive for @ @ @ @ @ our quarantine and recovery process immediately .
We will get through this TOGETHER !
” @ @ @ @ @ Hope Hicks , one of his top advisors , had tested positive for the virus @ @ @ @ @ that we pray for the President and First Lady ’ s speedy recovery .
They @ @ @ @ @ I ’ m sure they ’ ll be fine .
UPDATE : The President ’ @ @ @ @ @ confirming the diagnosis and saying that President Trump and the First Lady are both well @ @ @ @ @ from the First Lady saying they are feeling fine and are quaranting :

President Trump just tweeted that he and First Lady Melania Trump have tested positive for COVID-19:
Tonight, @FLOTUS and I tested positive for COVID-19. We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately. We will get through this TOGETHER! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 2, 2020
In case the tweet doesn’t show up for you, it says “Tonight, FLOTUS and I tested positive for COVID-19. We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately. We will get through this TOGETHER!”
Earlier tonight Trump reported that Hope Hicks, one of his top advisors, had tested positive for the virus:
Hope Hicks, who has been working so hard without even taking a small break, has just tested positive for Covid 19. Terrible! The First Lady and I are waiting for our test results. In the meantime, we will begin our quarantine process! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 2, 2020
It goes without saying that we pray for the President and First Lady’s speedy recovery. They are in great hands and I’m sure they’ll be fine.
UPDATE: The President’s doctor released this statement confirming the diagnosis and saying that President Trump and the First Lady are both well:
UPDATE: A tweet from the First Lady saying they are feeling fine and are quaranting:
As too many Americans have done this year, @potus & I are quarantining at home after testing positive for COVID-19. We are feeling good & I have postponed all upcoming engagements. Please be sure you are staying safe & we will all get through this together. — Melania Trump (@FLOTUS) October 2, 2020


therightscoop--2020-10-02--“I am driving liberals crazy” – CNN plays leaked audio of Melania Trump slamming the liberal media

The desperate liberal media is now attacking Melania Trump tonight , playing leaked audio from a former assistant of Melania who surreptitiously recorded her during a phone conversation without her knowledge .
Watch : Melania is clearly frustrated with the liberal media in this entire clip .
But the best line comes when she ’ s talking about her jacket that she wore in 2018 that had written on the back “ I really don ’ t care do you ” .
When asked about the jacket , she said “ I ’ m driving the liberal media crazy and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the audio is her sharing her frustrations about the liberal media attacking her with the border family “ separation ” issue , when she ’ s just being the First Lady and doing First Lady stuff , like putting up Christmas decorations .
And when she tries to do something like reuniting a child and mother , she says the media won ’ t run the story .
And she knows why , saying it ’ s because they are against her and Trump .
What ’ s interesting is that many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ look human , and they love her even more because of it :

The desperate liberal media is now attacking Melania Trump tonight, playing leaked audio from a former assistant of Melania who surreptitiously recorded her during a phone conversation without her knowledge. Watch:
Here's all of the Melania Trump audio played on @andersoncooper tonight. The audio was taped by her former friend and advisor @SWWCreative. In the tapes, Mrs. Trump talks about: – Family separations
– Christmas
– "Liberal media"
– The "I really don't care" jacket pic.twitter.com/N2Y8QtqD8n — Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) October 2, 2020
Melania is clearly frustrated with the liberal media in this entire clip. But the best line comes when she’s talking about her jacket that she wore in 2018 that had written on the back “I really don’t care do you”. When asked about the jacket, she said “I’m driving the liberal media crazy and they deserve it!”
The rest of the audio is her sharing her frustrations about the liberal media attacking her with the border family “separation” issue, when she’s just being the First Lady and doing First Lady stuff, like putting up Christmas decorations. And when she tries to do something like reuniting a child and mother, she says the media won’t run the story. And she knows why, saying it’s because they are against her and Trump.
Let me get this straight, the media is mad at First Lady Melania for saying she wanted to help kids more than decorate for Christmas — Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) October 2, 2020
What’s interesting is that many are saying the audio simply makes her look human, and they love her even more because of it:
This literally makes me love Melania Trump even more. 🤣 She didn't say a single thing that's not true. Love it. But shame on her fame-seeking "friend" for betraying her privacy. pic.twitter.com/44H6hDBtgq — Liz Wheeler (@Liz_Wheeler) October 2, 2020
Was pretty indifferent on the First Lady. Until now. Now I f***ing LOVE HER! https://t.co/FAzSnDq81e — Eddie Scarry (@eScarry) October 2, 2020
Melania comes off looking great here. pic.twitter.com/JewWP510LH — David Reaboi (@davereaboi) October 2, 2020