therightscoop--2020-06-06--Thug mercilessly kicks guy in the face after he hits the ground at protest; police arrest a 14-year-

Thug mercilessly kicks guy in the face after he hits the ground at protest; police arrest a 14-year-old for it

There was a horrible video of a man being beat up by a bunch of thugs at a protest in Portland , and the cops believe that a 14-year-old did it .
Caution , the video is very graphic and violent : A lot of people wanted to find the perp who did the deed , and cops believe they found him : On Saturday , May 30 , 2020 , at approximately 7:00 p.m. , a male victim was seriously assaulted in the 1000 block of SW 4th Avenue near an active demonstration .
The victim briefly lost consciousness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Video of the assault surfaced on social media showing a male suspect aggressively kicking the victim in the head after he had been punched by another subject and knocked to the ground .
Thanks to the public ’ s help , the suspect who was kicking the victim in the head was identified and Detectives were notified .
On June 4 , 2020 , at 1:20 p.m. , Assault Detectives detained the 14-year-old male who was identified as the suspect who kicked the victim in the head .
The 14-year-old suspect was taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Center for the offense of Assault II .
The investigation continues .
Various media platforms have falsely rumored the victim has passed away .
The male victim sustained serious injuries but is not deceased .
Ugh .
Just horrible .
Imagine the circumstances around which someone could get to the point where they justify that kind of attack .

There was a horrible video of a man being beat up by a bunch of thugs at a protest in Portland, and the cops believe that a 14-year-old did it. Caution, the video is very graphic and violent:
Kicked in the head laying lifeless on the street A man had his teeth literally knocked out by Portland rioters Reporter @farleymedia shows how vicious these riots have become Nobody is safe No business is exempt from destruction pic.twitter.com/7x1PAfvy3a — ELIJAH (@ElijahSchaffer) May 31, 2020
A lot of people wanted to find the perp who did the deed, and cops believe they found him:
On Saturday, May 30, 2020, at approximately 7:00 p.m., a male victim was seriously assaulted in the 1000 block of SW 4th Avenue near an active demonstration. The victim briefly lost consciousness and the suspect left the scene. Video of the assault surfaced on social media showing a male suspect aggressively kicking the victim in the head after he had been punched by another subject and knocked to the ground. Thanks to the public’s help, the suspect who was kicking the victim in the head was identified and Detectives were notified. On June 4, 2020, at 1:20 p.m., Assault Detectives detained the 14-year-old male who was identified as the suspect who kicked the victim in the head. The 14-year-old suspect was taken to the Donald E. Long Juvenile Detention Center for the offense of Assault II. The investigation continues. Various media platforms have falsely rumored the victim has passed away. The male victim sustained serious injuries but is not deceased.
Ugh. Just horrible. Imagine the circumstances around which someone could get to the point where they justify that kind of attack.
[hat tip: The Blaze]


therightscoop--2020-06-07--Canceled: J.K. Rowling said another true thing that has enraged and confused liberals

J.K. Rowling is getting canceled yet again for saying a true thing that is infuriating and confusing liberals : Oh @ @ @ @ @ re gon na hunt you down and kill you for this , lady , what @ @ @ @ @ ?
!
Well , according to the woke far-left extremists who are trying to seize @ @ @ @ @ our government and our society , that is ABSOLUTELY hate speech !
Because it hurts @ @ @ @ @ feelings somewhere .
And if you don ’ t believe me check this out : @ @ @ @ @ who live in lies .

J.K. Rowling is getting canceled yet again for saying a true thing that is infuriating and confusing liberals:
If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction. If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased. I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth. — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) June 6, 2020
Oh boy. Yeah they’re gonna hunt you down and kill you for this, lady, what are you thinking?!?!
The idea that women like me, who’ve been empathetic to trans people for decades, feeling kinship because they’re vulnerable in the same way as women – ie, to male violence – ‘hate’ trans people because they think sex is real and has lived consequences – is a nonsense. — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) June 6, 2020
I respect every trans person’s right to live any way that feels authentic and comfortable to them. I’d march with you if you were discriminated against on the basis of being trans. At the same time, my life has been shaped by being female. I do not believe it’s hateful to say so. — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) June 6, 2020
Well, according to the woke far-left extremists who are trying to seize more and more control of our government and our society, that is ABSOLUTELY hate speech! Because it hurts some transgender person’s feelings somewhere. And if you don’t believe me check this out:
J.K. Rowling's transphobic rants are the 21st century equivalent of "I love black people. I really do. I just don't think blacks and whites should be getting married and having kids. Erasing the concept of race removes the ability to…" — Chris Beffa 🍞🌹 (@chrisbeffa) June 6, 2020
The fact that this is your priority right now, that you have a pathological need to keep harping on this—what a truly disappointing human you have turned out to be. The trans people you claim to love deserve better than you. Happy Pride Month, Jo! — Louis Peitzman (@LouisPeitzman) June 6, 2020
Truth is terrifying to those who live in lies.


therightscoop--2020-06-06--Remembering the tremendous sacrifice by our military on D-Day, June 6, 1944

Today is the 76th anniversary of D-Day , where we remember the greatest generation and those sacrifices of brave Americans who turned the tide of World War II with their invasion of the beaches at Normandy , France to defeat Hitler and the German armies : June 6 , 1944 , 160,000 Allied troops landed along a 50-mile stretch of heavily-fortified French coastline to fight Nazi Germany on the beaches of Normandy , France .
General Dwight D. Eisenhower called the operation a crusade in which “ we will accept nothing less than full victory.
” More than 5,000 Ships @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and by day ’ s end on June 6 , the Allies gained a foot- hold in Normandy .
The D-Day cost was high -more than 9,000 Allied Soldiers were killed or wounded — but more than 100,000 Soldiers began the march across Europe to defeat Hitler .
The president tweeted out a great reminder in this video today : Here ’ s his speech from Normandy last year : Lastly Fox News interviewed a 97-year-old D-Day veteran who parachuted in Normandy last year , just as he did in 1944 : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ . ]

Today is the 76th anniversary of D-Day, where we remember the greatest generation and those sacrifices of brave Americans who turned the tide of World War II with their invasion of the beaches at Normandy, France to defeat Hitler and the German armies:
June 6, 1944, 160,000 Allied troops landed along a 50-mile stretch of heavily-fortified French coastline to fight Nazi Germany on the beaches of Normandy, France. General Dwight D. Eisenhower called the operation a crusade in which “we will accept nothing less than full victory.” More than 5,000 Ships and 13,000 aircraft supported the D-Day invasion, and by day’s end on June 6, the Allies gained a foot- hold in Normandy. The D-Day cost was high -more than 9,000 Allied Soldiers were killed or wounded — but more than 100,000 Soldiers began the march across Europe to defeat Hitler.
The president tweeted out a great reminder in this video today:
On June 6, 1944, our Greatest Generation bravely stormed the beaches of Normandy. "Those who fought here won a future for our nation. They won the survival of our civilization. And they showed us the way to love, cherish, and defend our way of life for many centuries to come." pic.twitter.com/XbrWIkXFfl — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 6, 2020
And also:
Here’s his speech from Normandy last year:
Lastly Fox News interviewed a 97-year-old D-Day veteran who parachuted in Normandy last year, just as he did in 1944:
Watch the latest video at foxnews.com
Never Forget.
[Adapted from our post last year.]


therightscoop--2020-06-06--Las Vegas is waaayyy open for business, and twitter is pissed off at the hypocrisy

Well I ’ ve been resisting this for a while , but here we go .
Check this craziness out : Yes Vegas has blown open its doors and it doesn ’ t look like a lot of people are practicing the social distancing we were scolded about just two weeks ago .
And there ’ s a lot of people who are pissed about it : Then there ’ s this guy covering for the protesters : So yes , we ’ ve given up on the lockdown .
That doesn ’ t mean we ’ re safe , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been so hypocritical about not screaming at BLM protesters while screaming at anti-lockdown protesters , that no one believes them anymore .
This is what is going to happen .
I see it so clearly .
There WILL be a second wave .
I don ’ t know if it will be bad or very bad , but it ’ s coming .
When it does , everyone on the left will say , ‘ how dare you blame the protesters when you had these idiots not wear masks in Vegas and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everyone on the right will yell back , “ how dare you yell at us when all the protesters were out not wearing masks ?
!
” And they ’ ll both be right about each other , but it won ’ t matter because we ’ re hopelessly and stupidly entrenched in our partisan tribalist echo chambers .
Wooohooo !
Who wants to go to Vegas ?

Well I’ve been resisting this for a while, but here we go. Check this craziness out:
I'm so fucking furious. We tanked our economy, put 40 million Americans out of work and not to mention all the other billions of side-effects to essentially, in one week, act like it never happened. https://t.co/SPe7biJaCg — Bridget Phetasy (@BridgetPhetasy) June 6, 2020
Yes Vegas has blown open its doors and it doesn’t look like a lot of people are practicing the social distancing we were scolded about just two weeks ago. And there’s a lot of people who are pissed about it:
What are we to make of this? 2 people wearing masks in this entire video and not a lot of social distancing. What have the past 3 months have been about? #LasVegas is America's #Sweden #COVID https://t.co/ESSSvBjxsG — Robert Lusetich (@RobertLusetich) June 6, 2020
Then there’s this guy covering for the protesters:
in 2-3 weeks the media is going to use growing COVID numbers to vilify the masked, outdoor, necessary, life-saving protests across the world. When they do that, show them these mask-less people indoors across the country fighting for nobody's rights whatsoever. https://t.co/6kdQ1lB6Fl — David Dennis Jr. (@DavidDTSS) June 6, 2020
Huh? That makes zero sense! LOL!
remember this video of unmasked people inside this Petri dish of recycled air when in 1-2 weeks they try to blame the spike in COVID across the country on protesters who have been outside, masked and socially distanced. https://t.co/cXYVwWoESZ — The French Horns in Chromatica I, II, III (@teejslipko) June 6, 2020
So yes, we’ve given up on the lockdown. That doesn’t mean we’re safe, it’s just that the experts have been so hypocritical about not screaming at BLM protesters while screaming at anti-lockdown protesters, that no one believes them anymore.
This is what is going to happen. I see it so clearly. There WILL be a second wave. I don’t know if it will be bad or very bad, but it’s coming. When it does, everyone on the left will say, ‘how dare you blame the protesters when you had these idiots not wear masks in Vegas and everywhere else?!?” And everyone on the right will yell back, “how dare you yell at us when all the protesters were out not wearing masks?!” And they’ll both be right about each other, but it won’t matter because we’re hopelessly and stupidly entrenched in our partisan tribalist echo chambers. Wooohooo!
Who wants to go to Vegas?


therightscoop--2020-06-06--Pathetic: New York Times tells people to shut out relatives until they get financially woke

IN the wake of the New York Times debacle with the Tom Cotton op-ed , now they ’ re literally @ @ @ @ @ extortionists : Ugh .
So stupid .
This is the worst aspect of liberalism , @ @ @ @ @ .
You can ’ t have family members or friends unless they agree with you @ @ @ @ @ that ’ s not enough , now they have to donate their money or you @ @ @ @ @ your life .
Pathetic .
I ’ m glad my friends and family aren ’ @ @ @ @ @ they know me well enough they know I don ’ t play these idiotic emotional @ @

IN the wake of the New York Times debacle with the Tom Cotton op-ed, now they’re literally telling people to be emotional extortionists:
Today, The New York Times ran an op-ed telling people to withhold affection from their relatives unless they protest or give money to anti-racism organizations. Where does this end? I want racial equality, but I utterly disdain any person or institution endorsing such tactics. pic.twitter.com/vVTnKq75mo — Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) June 6, 2020
Ugh. So stupid. This is the worst aspect of liberalism, it has to politicize everything. You can’t have family members or friends unless they agree with you 100%, and now that’s not enough, now they have to donate their money or you can cut them out of your life. Pathetic.
this @nytimes oped instructs us to excommunicate "loved ones" until they've attended a protest, or paid cash to author-approved causes.
So grandparents need to risk COVID19 at a protest or pay up, or no grandkids
How did antiracism get so creepy & cultishhttps://t.co/ppJuOK69ue pic.twitter.com/Lbcj1mhD1A — Jonathan Kay (@jonkay) June 6, 2020
Part of a @nytimes op-ed today by Chad Sanders. "Texts: To your relatives and loved ones telling them you will not be visiting them or answering phone calls until they take significant action in supporting black lives either through protest or financial contributions." LUNACY! — Judith Lankau (@judith_lankau) June 6, 2020
I’m glad my friends and family aren’t this stupid. If they know me well enough they know I don’t play these idiotic emotional games….


therightscoop--2020-06-06--Trump says he wishes Drew Brees hadn’t apologized – and Brees responds to him

El Presidente tried to give Drew Brees some backup yesterday : Brees double down in his response , which he posted on Instagram : Here ’ s what he said : To @ realdonaldtrump Through my ongoing conversations with friends , teammates , and leaders in the black community , I realize this is not an issue about the American flag .
It has never been .
We can no longer use the flag to turn people away or distract them from the real issues that face our black communities .
We did this back in 2017 , and regretfully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this week .
We must stop talking about the flag and shift our attention to the real issues of systemic racial injustice , economic oppression , police brutality , and judicial & prison reform .
We are at a critical juncture in our nation ’ s history !
If not now , then when ?
We as a white community need to listen and learn from the pain and suffering of our black communities .
We must acknowledge the problems , identify the solutions , and then put this into action .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This will require all of us .
This poor guy seems to have been caught in the middle of all this .
He ’ s such a great guy and has done so much for New Orleans , it ’ s sad that people need to tear him down over this .
That being said , I can see what is coming .
The NFL is embracing this movement because of what they see in the media and social media .
This next season is probably gon na be crap because it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
get ready .

El Presidente tried to give Drew Brees some backup yesterday:
I am a big fan of Drew Brees. I think he’s truly one of the greatest quarterbacks, but he should not have taken back his original stance on honoring our magnificent American Flag. OLD GLORY is to be revered, cherished, and flown high… — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 5, 2020
…We should be standing up straight and tall, ideally with a salute, or a hand on heart. There are other things you can protest, but not our Great American Flag – NO KNEELING! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 5, 2020
Brees double down in his response, which he posted on Instagram:
To @realdonaldtrump Through my ongoing conversations with friends, teammates, and leaders in the black community, I realize this is not an issue about the American flag. It has never been. We can no longer use the… https://t.co/zcw1NMZF2W — Drew Brees (@drewbrees) June 6, 2020
Here’s what he said:
To @realdonaldtrump
Through my ongoing conversations with friends, teammates, and leaders in the black community, I realize this is not an issue about the American flag. It has never been. We can no longer use the flag to turn people away or distract them from the real issues that face our black communities.
We did this back in 2017, and regretfully I brought it back with my comments this week. We must stop talking about the flag and shift our attention to the real issues of systemic racial injustice, economic oppression, police brutality, and judicial & prison reform.
We are at a critical juncture in our nation’s history! If not now, then when? We as a white community need to listen and learn from the pain and suffering of our black communities. We must acknowledge the problems, identify the solutions, and then put this into action. The black community cannot do it alone. This will require all of us.
This poor guy seems to have been caught in the middle of all this. He’s such a great guy and has done so much for New Orleans, it’s sad that people need to tear him down over this.
That being said, I can see what is coming. The NFL is embracing this movement because of what they see in the media and social media. This next season is probably gonna be crap because it’s gonna be full politicized…. get ready.


therightscoop--2020-06-06--Journalist Andy Ngo sues Antifa for $900,000 over their “campaign of terror and harassment”

Andy Ngo has been on the frontlines reporting on Antifa , but unfortunately they have focused their violence against him in order to shut him up .
From the Washington Times : Journalist Andy Ngo filed a lawsuit Thursday against the Rose City Antifa , seeking $ 900,000 in damages for waging a “ campaign of terror and harassment ” against him , including a series of physical attacks .
A complaint filed in Oregon Circuit Court said Mr. Ngo has been assaulted , stalked , threatened and robbed by members of the Rose City Antifa in Portland , suffering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ June 2019 by a black-masked mob .
I wonder if the declaration from Trump that he is going to name Antifa as a terrorist organization is one of the reasons that they believe they can go ahead with this lawsuit .
Here ’ s more about the actual lawsuit : “ What happened to Andy Ngo is disturbing and should send chills down the spines of every journalist in the country , ” said Ms. Dhillon , the Republican National Committeewoman from California , in a statement .
In addition to the Rose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individuals and identifies them as Antifa activists .
“ The police , district attorney ’ s office , and local politicians have totally failed to bring justice to the perpetrators of this heinous act and we bring this lawsuit as a last resort in the face of their unwillingness to enforce the law , ” said Ms. Dhillon .
“ As we watch America ’ s greatest cities burn live on television at the hands of Antifa terrorists , we know they were emboldened by the inaction in Portland.
” I remember seeing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had secret info on Ngo and that people would regret supporting him when that information came out .
It never really came out .
Here ’ s Ngo talking about Antifa on the Larry O ’ Connor show : And here ’ s our previous article when Antifa attacked him violently in 2019 , and also when they stalked harassed and terrorized him at his home .
I ’ m guessing the scumbags will have a tough time in court , but he might have an even tougher time getting that money if @ @

Andy Ngo has been on the frontlines reporting on Antifa, but unfortunately they have focused their violence against him in order to shut him up. From the Washington Times:
Journalist Andy Ngo filed a lawsuit Thursday against the Rose City Antifa, seeking $900,000 in damages for waging a “campaign of terror and harassment” against him, including a series of physical attacks. A complaint filed in Oregon Circuit Court said Mr. Ngo has been assaulted, stalked, threatened and robbed by members of the Rose City Antifa in Portland, suffering a brain hemorrhage after being attacked in June 2019 by a black-masked mob.
This part is interesting:
The lawsuit, filed by San Francisco attorney Harmeet K. Dhillon and the Center for American Liberty, described Rose City Antifa as a racketeering operation under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act.
I wonder if the declaration from Trump that he is going to name Antifa as a terrorist organization is one of the reasons that they believe they can go ahead with this lawsuit. Here’s more about the actual lawsuit:
“What happened to Andy Ngo is disturbing and should send chills down the spines of every journalist in the country,” said Ms. Dhillon, the Republican National Committeewoman from California, in a statement. In addition to the Rose City Antifa, the complaint names five individuals and identifies them as Antifa activists. “The police, district attorney’s office, and local politicians have totally failed to bring justice to the perpetrators of this heinous act and we bring this lawsuit as a last resort in the face of their unwillingness to enforce the law,” said Ms. Dhillon. “As we watch America’s greatest cities burn live on television at the hands of Antifa terrorists, we know they were emboldened by the inaction in Portland.”
I remember seeing tweets from Antifa sympathizers saying that they had secret info on Ngo and that people would regret supporting him when that information came out. It never really came out.
Here’s Ngo talking about Antifa on the Larry O’Connor show:
And here’s our previous article when Antifa attacked him violently in 2019, and also when they stalked harassed and terrorized him at his home.
I’m guessing the scumbags will have a tough time in court, but he might have an even tougher time getting that money if he wins…


therightscoop--2020-06-07--Los Angeles gay pride parade fires organizer because he wanted to partner with LAPD

This is how bad it ’ s gotten out there .
An organizer for the Los Angeles gay pride parade was forced to step down after they discovered that he was… organizing with the LAPD .
What ?
Yeah , and ?
Do you think it might help to organize with the local cops when you throw an enormous parade and might need their help ?
Maybe ?
Jeff Consoletti , the event producer , sparked outrage on social media when he posted a letter to Instagram on behalf of Christopher Street West , the nonprofit helming the Los Angeles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ application submitted Tuesday to the Los Angeles Police Department .
In it , Consoletti , who is gay , wrote that “ our community stands in solidarity with Black Lives Matter and Justice for George Floyd to denounce racial prejudice and injustice , police brutality against communities of color , intolerance , and violence.
” Consoletti also stressed the decades-long “ strong and unified partnership with law enforcement.
” L.A .
Pride is the country ’ s oldest permitted Pride march — a permit ’ s approval necessitates a partnership with law enforcement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this collaboration .
However , some activists on social media noted how any partnership with cops is counterintuitive to the purpose of the protests taking place across the United States and the world in response to the killing of George Floyd , police brutality , and race-based violence .
Welp .
Hope you don ’ t get any protesters , or unfriendly unwelcome visitors , because if you need the cops now , they may not come when you call…

This is how bad it’s gotten out there. An organizer for the Los Angeles gay pride parade was forced to step down after they discovered that he was… organizing with the LAPD. What?
I’ve been informed @LAPride is, in fact, working with police for their so-called “Black solidarity” march. Attached is a screenshot of an event producer’s letter to the LAPD underscoring “a strong and unified partnership with law enforcement.” Homos, this is not it. pic.twitter.com/7YkndfDUrV — Fran Tirado (@fransquishco) June 5, 2020
Yeah, and? Do you think it might help to organize with the local cops when you throw an enormous parade and might need their help? Maybe?
I guess not:
Jeff Consoletti, the event producer, sparked outrage on social media when he posted a letter to Instagram on behalf of Christopher Street West, the nonprofit helming the Los Angeles demonstration. The letter was a permit application submitted Tuesday to the Los Angeles Police Department. In it, Consoletti, who is gay, wrote that “our community stands in solidarity with Black Lives Matter and Justice for George Floyd to denounce racial prejudice and injustice, police brutality against communities of color, intolerance, and violence.” Consoletti also stressed the decades-long “strong and unified partnership with law enforcement.” L.A. Pride is the country’s oldest permitted Pride march — a permit’s approval necessitates a partnership with law enforcement — and 2020 marks its 50th anniversary of this collaboration. However, some activists on social media noted how any partnership with cops is counterintuitive to the purpose of the protests taking place across the United States and the world in response to the killing of George Floyd, police brutality, and race-based violence.
Welp. Hope you don’t get any protesters, or unfriendly unwelcome visitors, because if you need the cops now, they may not come when you call…


therightscoop--2020-06-07--Mitt Romney marches with ‘Black Lives Matter’ protesters outside the White House

Mitt Romney is getting castigated by many on the right for marching with Black Lives Matter today outside the White @ @ @ @ @ a reason why he might be doing it today : This might be unpopular , @ @ @ @ @ really bother me that much .
He ’ s not calling for the defunding of @ @ @ @ @ just marching against injustice and racism .
Of course , not everyone feels like I @ @ @ @ @ .

Mitt Romney is getting castigated by many on the right for marching with Black Lives Matter today outside the White House:
Friendly reminder that Joe Biden literally told a crowd of black people that Mitt Romney was going to bring back slavery and put them in chains if he became president in 2012 https://t.co/1em2iGtFnk — Harry Khachatrian (@Harry1T6) June 7, 2020
.@MittRomney is marching with a group of nearly 1,000 Christians to the White House. Here he is on video saying why he’s walking: “… to make sure that people understand that Black Lives Matter” https://t.co/KCxJNchCMs pic.twitter.com/Za0Am2WL8g — Hannah Natanson (@hannah_natanson) June 7, 2020
Here’s a reason why he might be doing it today:
This is my father, George Romney, participating in a Civil Rights march in the Detroit suburbs during the late 1960s—“Force alone will not eliminate riots,” he said. “We must eliminate the problems from which they stem.” pic.twitter.com/SzrcAyfPD8 — Mitt Romney (@MittRomney) June 6, 2020
This might be unpopular, but this doesn’t really bother me that much. He’s not calling for the defunding of police, he’s just marching against injustice and racism. Of course, not everyone feels like I do:
Media are ***extremely excited*** about Mitt Romney supporting the political group “Black Lives Matter,” whose policy positions include nationwide defunding of police. — Mollie (@MZHemingway) June 7, 2020
There you go.


therightscoop--2020-06-07--BREAKING: NY Times Opinion Editor who allowed Tom Cotton’s “Send in the Troops” op-ed has been PURGE

BREAKING: NY Times Opinion Editor who allowed Tom Cotton’s “Send in the Troops” op-ed has been PURGED

The New York Times has just announced that James Bennet , the Editorial Page Editor who allowed Tom Cotton ’ s “ Send in the Troops ” op-ed that triggered leftists everywhere , including over 800 staffers at the Times who signed a protest letter , is resigning : Not only is Bennet being purged , his deputy is also being ‘ reassigned ’ : Amazing .
We told you last Thursday that Cotton ’ s op-ed triggered staffers so much that they were holding a town-hall on Friday with Dean Baquet , the executive editor and Mr. Bennet , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them to vent their frustrations .
Well that musta been some town-hall .
Either way you look at this it ’ s crazy .
After all , Tom Cotton is a sitting U.S .
Senator and there was nothing controversial about his column .
He simply called on the US to “ send in the troops ” to stop the rioting , looting , and restore order .
This is an opinion shared by many Americans , especially those who ’ ve seen their businesses burned down and trashed by looters and rioters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NY Times editor , Bennet , allowed the Taliban to post an op-ed voicing their demands this year and nobody cared .
But because he allowed Cotton ’ s op-ed , he ’ s forced to resign ?
Wow .
Here ’ s a few reactions from the Twitterverse :

The New York Times has just announced that James Bennet, the Editorial Page Editor who allowed Tom Cotton’s “Send in the Troops” op-ed that triggered leftists everywhere, including over 800 staffers at the Times who signed a protest letter, is resigning:
The @nytimes announced today that James Bennet, Editorial Page Editor since May 2016, is resigning effective immediately. Katie Kingsbury, who joined The Times in 2017, has been named as acting Editorial Page Editor through the November election. https://t.co/84QX4OrrcG — NYTimes Communications (@NYTimesPR) June 7, 2020
Not only is Bennet being purged, his deputy is also being ‘reassigned’:
Inbox: James Bennet is out as opinion editor of The New York Times after the publication of the "Send in the Troops" op-ed by Sen. Tom Cotton that led to outrage among staff and readers. Here's the email employees just got from the NYT publisher. pic.twitter.com/NnHIohC1Mm — Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs (@NickAtNews) June 7, 2020
Amazing. We told you last Thursday that Cotton’s op-ed triggered staffers so much that they were holding a town-hall on Friday with Dean Baquet, the executive editor and Mr. Bennet, the editorial page editor, to allow them to vent their frustrations. Well that musta been some town-hall.
Either way you look at this it’s crazy. After all, Tom Cotton is a sitting U.S. Senator and there was nothing controversial about his column. He simply called on the US to “send in the troops” to stop the rioting, looting, and restore order. This is an opinion shared by many Americans, especially those who’ve seen their businesses burned down and trashed by looters and rioters.
As Cotton pointed out the same NY Times editor, Bennet, allowed the Taliban to post an op-ed voicing their demands this year and nobody cared. But because he allowed Cotton’s op-ed, he’s forced to resign? Wow.
Here’s a few reactions from the Twitterverse:
The purification ritual is complete. https://t.co/j14rwJBsWX — Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) June 7, 2020
NYT is destroying itself https://t.co/GQqiXE7KsU — Matt Mackowiak (@MattMackowiak) June 7, 2020
Wow. Rough daycare center he was running! https://t.co/1gxAVSVH8n — Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) June 7, 2020
Running an opinion shared by 58% of the country is liable to get you canned at the New York Times https://t.co/gzoZlhkVIb — Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) June 7, 2020


therightscoop--2020-06-07--Liberal Minneapolis mayor tries to suck up to BLM, gets publicly humiliated and ridiculed instead

The liberal mayor of Minneapolis , Minnesota tried to be a poster boy for woke white liberals , and instead @ @ @ @ @ what happens when you suck up to extremists .
Man , that ’ s like @ @ @ @ @ Thrones right there !
!
The BLM leader literally says that they don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ community .
That is just insane .
And look , I know we ’ re @ @ @ @ @ screw that community then .
That is unfair to the reasonable , rational people in @ @ @ @ @ ’ t out protesting .
They get their businesses burnt to the ground , they @ @ @ @ @ they are innocent of this lunacy .
They just don ’ t get heard as @ @ @ @ @ , because they don ’ t get the press coverage .
Anyway , don ’ @ @ @ @ @ , this should be enough to get him re-elected again :

The liberal mayor of Minneapolis, Minnesota tried to be a poster boy for woke white liberals, and instead became the poster boy for what happens when you suck up to extremists.
This is important because it illustrates how the far left always eats their own. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has groveled and virtue signaled to the far left constantly but it will never will be enough. The Democrats created this and it will destroy them. pic.twitter.com/zer7OlRo0O — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) June 7, 2020
“I do not support the full abolition of the police,” Mayor Jacob Frey of Minneapolis said when he was put on the spot at a rally on Saturday. With that, protesters yelled “Go home, Jacob, go home!” and “Shame! Shame!” https://t.co/573TsGf4fW pic.twitter.com/NJF4hTErYm — The New York Times (@nytimes) June 7, 2020
Man, that’s like straight out of Game of Thrones right there!!
The BLM leader literally says that they don’t want any police in their community. That is just insane. And look, I know we’re all tempted to say well screw that community then. That is unfair to the reasonable, rational people in the same community who aren’t out protesting. They get their businesses burnt to the ground, they lose their jobs, and they are innocent of this lunacy. They just don’t get heard as much as this dimwitted loudmouths, because they don’t get the press coverage.
Anyway, don’t worry for the mayor, this should be enough to get him re-elected again:
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey….bruh. pic.twitter.com/vpX7jFNSPb — Chad Prather (@WatchChad) June 7, 2020
Hmm.


therightscoop--2020-06-07--Breaking: Woke police arrest Elmer Fudd for illegal 2nd Amendment advocacy, will strip him of his we

Breaking: Woke police arrest Elmer Fudd for illegal 2nd Amendment advocacy, will strip him of his weapons…

I can ’ t believe none of us realized the terrible , horrible example that Elmer Fudd has been to our poor little pudding-brained children about the terrors and horrors of gun possession and the Second Amendment !
God bless the woke police for arresting that miscreant this morning and stripping him of his weapons : In a new series based on the beloved “ Looney Tunes ” cartoons , the classic character Elmer Fudd will no longer carry a gun .
The new series “ Looney Tunes Cartoons , ” which premiered last week on the streaming service HBO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s characteristic violence – using sticks of dynamite , booby traps and the iconic anvils and bank safes dropped onto characters , The New York Times reported last week .
However , Peter Browngardt , the series executive producer and showrunner , told the outlet , “ We ’ re not doing guns.
” Ironically , anvil-on-bunny crime is at epidemic levels in this country , but no one cares because the BIG ANVIL corporations are buying off the major entertainment outlets .
Despicable !
!
More : “ But we can do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stuff .
All that was kind of grandfathered in , ” Browngardt told the outlet .
Elmer Fudd is regularly foiled trying to hunt Bugs Bunny on the show .
In the new series , the character will carry a scythe .
Yay for the woke police !
We are saved !
!
I can ’ t believe a dude with a cartoon gun is now contraband entertainment…

I can’t believe none of us realized the terrible, horrible example that Elmer Fudd has been to our poor little pudding-brained children about the terrors and horrors of gun possession and the Second Amendment! God bless the woke police for arresting that miscreant this morning and stripping him of his weapons:
In a new series based on the beloved “Looney Tunes” cartoons, the classic character Elmer Fudd will no longer carry a gun. The new series “Looney Tunes Cartoons,” which premiered last week on the streaming service HBO Max, will feature the cartoon’s characteristic violence – using sticks of dynamite, booby traps and the iconic anvils and bank safes dropped onto characters, The New York Times reported last week. However, Peter Browngardt, the series executive producer and showrunner, told the outlet, “We’re not doing guns.”
Ironically, anvil-on-bunny crime is at epidemic levels in this country, but no one cares because the BIG ANVIL corporations are buying off the major entertainment outlets. Despicable!! More:
“But we can do cartoony violence — TNT, the Acme stuff. All that was kind of grandfathered in,” Browngardt told the outlet. Elmer Fudd is regularly foiled trying to hunt Bugs Bunny on the show. In the new series, the character will carry a scythe.
Yay for the woke police! We are saved!!
I can't believe this needs to be said, but Yosemite Sam and Elmer Fudd were never responsible gun owners anyway. pic.twitter.com/4dgJ83WVgu — Dr. Jacqueline Antonovich (@jackiantonovich) June 7, 2020
Bugs Bunny learning that Elmer Fudd won’t have a gun anymore. pic.twitter.com/EtPcmpezzl — Houston (@H0ustonPa) June 7, 2020
gonna be so much more horrifying when Elmer Fudd kills Bugs Bunny with his bare hands — BUM CHILLUPS, NPR CLASS PUNDIT (@edsbs) June 7, 2020
Do you guys SERIOUSLY care whether or not Elmer Fudd has a gun in our shorts? You know how many gags we can do with guns? Fairly few. And the best were already done by the old guys. It's limiting. It was never about the gun, it was about Elmer's flawed, challenged masculinity. — Michael Ruocco (@AGuyWhoDraws) June 7, 2020
I'm protesting because Elmer Fudd is indirectly responsible for my rabbit being shot by a woefully ineffective shotgun. pic.twitter.com/YV8NFkasOA — El Copeo (@Kaciao5) June 7, 2020
BREAKING NEWS: HBO Max has decided that Elmer Fudd will no longer be using a gun to try and kill Bugs Bunny. Instead, he will be reading him Alyssa Milano's Tweets, hoping it has a similar effect. pic.twitter.com/wCjM3u8LQk — Price of Reason (@priceoreason) June 7, 2020
2020 Looney Tunes: "Gun violence has inspired us to take away Elmer Fudd's signature hunting rifle." 2012 Looney Tunes: pic.twitter.com/qadEBaAd07 — NeonManta (@NeonManta) June 7, 2020
I can’t believe a dude with a cartoon gun is now contraband entertainment…


therightscoop--2020-06-07--Scumbag attacked 82-year-old veteran because he held up a pro-Trump sign

A scumbag is alleged to have beaten an 82-year-old veteran just because he held up a pro-Trump sign .
Here ’ s what happened from the Washington Examiner : An 82-year-old Air Force veteran in Massachusetts was attacked for supporting President Trump , according to police .
Charlie Chase said a man came up to him screaming , while Chase was holding a pro-Trump sign and wearing a Trump hat near his house in Fall River on Tuesday .
“ Came running over to me , and he said , ‘ Gim me the sign.
’ He tried to take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t want to give it to him , so I was holding onto it .
So , he pulled it hard enough that he tore it in half , ” said Chase .
“ The guy , when he came at me , I had never seen a horror story that the face was so filled with hate and anger as his was .
I was just frozen.
” The man allegedly also picked Chase up during the altercation and then kicked him in the ribs when he was on the ground @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that was with me , I didn ’ t know that [ the suspect ] had lifted me up , but he apparently lifted me up and flung me down on my back to the ground , ” Chase said .
Police arrested Aidan Courtright , 27 , for the assault and charged him with a civil rights violation with injury , assault and battery on a person over 60 , vandalism of personal property , and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon .
He was released Thursday after a hearing and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ August .
Police say Chase was “ violently targeted for his political views and violently assaulted .
”

A scumbag is alleged to have beaten an 82-year-old veteran just because he held up a pro-Trump sign.
Here’s what happened from the Washington Examiner:
An 82-year-old Air Force veteran in Massachusetts was attacked for supporting President Trump, according to police.
Charlie Chase said a man came up to him screaming, while Chase was holding a pro-Trump sign and wearing a Trump hat near his house in Fall River on Tuesday.
“Came running over to me, and he said, ‘Gimme the sign.’ He tried to take the sign from me, I didn’t want to give it to him, so I was holding onto it. So, he pulled it hard enough that he tore it in half,” said Chase. “The guy, when he came at me, I had never seen a horror story that the face was so filled with hate and anger as his was. I was just frozen.”
The man allegedly also picked Chase up during the altercation and then kicked him in the ribs when he was on the ground.
“According to the other fella that was with me, I didn’t know that [the suspect] had lifted me up, but he apparently lifted me up and flung me down on my back to the ground,” Chase said.
Police arrested Aidan Courtright, 27, for the assault and charged him with a civil rights violation with injury, assault and battery on a person over 60, vandalism of personal property, and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. He was released Thursday after a hearing and was ordered to return to court in August.
Police say Chase was “violently targeted for his political views and violently assaulted.”


therightscoop--2020-06-07--UCLA students demand profs be fired because they refuse to cancel final exam for minorities over pro

UCLA students demand profs be fired because they refuse to cancel final exam for minorities over protests

I want to say that I can ’ t believe this story but I can believe it all too well given what we ’ re seeing out of colleges these days .
Guess what happened when a prof at UCLA refused to cancel final exams for minorities who were supposedly grieving over the death of George Floyd ?
Check it out : Some students at the University of California Los Angeles are demanding the firing of professors who refuse to cancel final exams over the death of George Floyd .
Professor Gordon Klein of UCLA ’ s Anderson School of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ declined to allow minority students to skip the final exams over grief caused by the death of Floyd , a black man who died while in police custody in Minneapolis on May 25 , according to the Washington Free Beacon .
This is just pathetic .
Good for him for standing his ground : “ Thanks for your suggestion in your email below that I give black students special treatment , given the tragedy in Minnesota , ” Klein reportedly said in an email to a student who requested a final exam reprieve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the classmates that are black ?
How can I identify them since we ’ ve been having online classes only ?
Are there any students that may be of mixed parentage , such as half black-half Asian ?
What do you suggest I do with respect to them ?
A full concession or just half ?
” So of course , the snowflake students got offended and want the world to cater to their whims : Preet Bains , a UCLA senior , started a Change.org petition asking the university to fire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ask for your support in having Professor Klein ’ s professorship terminated for his extremely insensitive , dismissive , and woefully racist response to his students ’ request for empathy and compassion during a time of civil unrest , ” the petition says .
As of Thursday afternoon , 18,000 people had signed the petition .
“ Some students have asked that the final exam be delayed or changed or waived altogether , ” Klein said in another email to a student .
“ Life deals all of us challenges and I have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ facing some now .
In a perfectly fair world , I would be able to take these individual factors into account and perhaps modify the terms in our course syllabus , but my understanding of university rules is that , with rare exceptions , I should not.
” This should explain all the woke madness we see all around us during a time when most people agree that George Floyd was wrongly killed by police .
Instead of drawing us together to call for justice , these morons want a free pass .
@ @ @

I want to say that I can’t believe this story but I can believe it all too well given what we’re seeing out of colleges these days. Guess what happened when a prof at UCLA refused to cancel final exams for minorities who were supposedly grieving over the death of George Floyd? Check it out:
Some students at the University of California Los Angeles are demanding the firing of professors who refuse to cancel final exams over the death of George Floyd. Professor Gordon Klein of UCLA’s Anderson School of Management was doxxed by students after he declined to allow minority students to skip the final exams over grief caused by the death of Floyd, a black man who died while in police custody in Minneapolis on May 25, according to the Washington Free Beacon.
This is just pathetic. Good for him for standing his ground:
“Thanks for your suggestion in your email below that I give black students special treatment, given the tragedy in Minnesota,” Klein reportedly said in an email to a student who requested a final exam reprieve. “Do you know the names of the classmates that are black? How can I identify them since we’ve been having online classes only? Are there any students that may be of mixed parentage, such as half black-half Asian? What do you suggest I do with respect to them? A full concession or just half?”
So of course, the snowflake students got offended and want the world to cater to their whims:
Preet Bains, a UCLA senior, started a Change.org petition asking the university to fire Klein for that response. “We ask for your support in having Professor Klein’s professorship terminated for his extremely insensitive, dismissive, and woefully racist response to his students’ request for empathy and compassion during a time of civil unrest,” the petition says. As of Thursday afternoon, 18,000 people had signed the petition.
This guy sounds very reasonable:
“Some students have asked that the final exam be delayed or changed or waived altogether,” Klein said in another email to a student. “Life deals all of us challenges and I have no doubt that many of you are facing some now. In a perfectly fair world, I would be able to take these individual factors into account and perhaps modify the terms in our course syllabus, but my understanding of university rules is that, with rare exceptions, I should not.”
This should explain all the woke madness we see all around us during a time when most people agree that George Floyd was wrongly killed by police. Instead of drawing us together to call for justice, these morons want a free pass. Just pathetic.


therightscoop--2020-06-08--Ilhan Omar spreads misleading viral video of a white cop arresting a black woman

So today , Rep. Ilhan Omar spread a video intending to show how a white cop “ choked out ” a black woman and how horrible it is : Of course , the doofus doesn ’ t look into the case , she just spreads the video because she doesn ’ t care about the truth , she just wants to incite more anger against the police .
Well , here ’ s the rest of the story : The video circulating on social media involving a use of force incident occurred on December 23 , 2018 .
The Bellevue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ force incidents and continually re-examines its policies and procedures to ensure they align with best practices .
This particular incident was investigated through the department ’ s Use of Force review process and the department ’ s complaint process .
It was found to be in compliance with department policy .
The police say it was not out of compliance with their policy .
So , what do they say happened here ?
“ I want the public to know that we take all use of force very seriously , ” said Chief @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disturbing .
When taken in its complete context the officer ’ s actions were determined reasonable for the resistance he was faced with .
From the officer ’ s perspective , he believed the driver posed a threat to him and others in the area through her refusal to comply with his lawful repeated orders , continual efforts to remove her hand from her purse , and her attempts put the car in gear .
As a result of the totality of the situation and the driver ’ s resistance , the officer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” They say she continued to refuse his orders .
You don ’ t see that in the video because it ’ s later in their interaction .
Is that true , or is it false ?
Well , we don ’ t know .
So you can ’ t judge the interaction just based on the video we see .
And that cuts either way .
On December 23 , 2018 , at approximately 11:00 am , the driver was stopped for suspicion of failing to transfer her automobile title , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ driver refused every one of the officer ’ s repeated lawful commands , including producing her identification , showing her hands , and exiting the car .
Instead , the driver reached inside her purse , despite the officer ’ s four separate commands not to reach into her purse .
This action caused the officer to fear she was reaching for a weapon .
The driver also left the car in gear and suddenly moved her hand to the gear-control ; the officer believed she was attempting to flee or assault him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked her to exit the vehicle , and she refused .
When the officer removed the driver from her vehicle , she continuously refused to comply with the offer ’ s command to put her arms behind her back .
As the officer attempted to take her into custody she pulled away from the officer and refused to be handcuffed .
In order to prevent injury to the driver and himself , the officer took the driver to the ground , and based on the continued resistance , applied a vascular neck restraint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this can be found here .
The driver was arrested on charges of Refusing to Comply with Police , Obstructing a Law Enforcement Officer , Resisting Arrest , and Motor Vehicle Transfer of Ownership Violations .
Look , we have to be honest here .
Police departments have lied in the past in order to cover up for their officers .
It happens .
We can ’ t simply assume the side of the police here .
But it ’ s equally dishonest to simply assume that the video shows everything we need @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to throw the cop under the bus .
Which is exactly what Ilhan Omar does .
The cops post other videos that show her just not following orders .
And I ’ m sorry but when you don ’ t follow police orders , you ’ re kinda asking for it .
Maybe follow what they say and file a complaint later about it instead of angrily arguing and risking a physical altercation .
So , if she didn ’ t file a complaint , why do we need to “ reform ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on behalf of the officer .
Perhaps this was an unjust arrest .
We don ’ t know if it was or not .
But you definitely can not judge whether it was or not just based on the snippet of video .
No matter how hard Ilhan Omar would like it to be another reason for people to protest , loot , riot and destroy .

So today, Rep. Ilhan Omar spread a video intending to show how a white cop “choked out” a black woman and how horrible it is:
How are we supposed to reform this? https://t.co/nu79GzBm7j — Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) June 8, 2020
Another video:
SHE WAS BRUTALIZED LIKE THIS FOR ASKING FOR A SHERIFF! FUCK THE POLICE! pic.twitter.com/Z0CWW1Ah4d — StanceGrounded (@_SJPeace_) June 6, 2020
Of course, the doofus doesn’t look into the case, she just spreads the video because she doesn’t care about the truth, she just wants to incite more anger against the police. Well, here’s the rest of the story:
The video circulating on social media involving a use of force incident occurred on December 23, 2018. The Bellevue Police Department thoroughly reviews all use of force incidents and continually re-examines its policies and procedures to ensure they align with best practices. This particular incident was investigated through the department’s Use of Force review process and the department’s complaint process. It was found to be in compliance with department policy.
The police say it was not out of compliance with their policy. So, what do they say happened here?
“I want the public to know that we take all use of force very seriously,” said Chief Steve Mylett. “The video is disturbing. When taken in its complete context the officer’s actions were determined reasonable for the resistance he was faced with. From the officer’s perspective, he believed the driver posed a threat to him and others in the area through her refusal to comply with his lawful repeated orders, continual efforts to remove her hand from her purse, and her attempts put the car in gear. As a result of the totality of the situation and the driver’s resistance, the officer used force to overcome the active resistance.”
They say she continued to refuse his orders. You don’t see that in the video because it’s later in their interaction. Is that true, or is it false? Well, we don’t know. So you can’t judge the interaction just based on the video we see. And that cuts either way.
On December 23, 2018, at approximately 11:00 am, the driver was stopped for suspicion of failing to transfer her automobile title, a violation of Washington State law. The driver refused every one of the officer’s repeated lawful commands, including producing her identification, showing her hands, and exiting the car. Instead, the driver reached inside her purse, despite the officer’s four separate commands not to reach into her purse. This action caused the officer to fear she was reaching for a weapon. The driver also left the car in gear and suddenly moved her hand to the gear-control; the officer believed she was attempting to flee or assault him with the vehicle. The officer repeatedly asked her to exit the vehicle, and she refused. When the officer removed the driver from her vehicle, she continuously refused to comply with the offer’s command to put her arms behind her back. As the officer attempted to take her into custody she pulled away from the officer and refused to be handcuffed. In order to prevent injury to the driver and himself, the officer took the driver to the ground, and based on the continued resistance, applied a vascular neck restraint technique. video of BPD training with this can be found here. The driver was arrested on charges of Refusing to Comply with Police, Obstructing a Law Enforcement Officer, Resisting Arrest, and Motor Vehicle Transfer of Ownership Violations.
Look, we have to be honest here. Police departments have lied in the past in order to cover up for their officers. It happens. We can’t simply assume the side of the police here. But it’s equally dishonest to simply assume that the video shows everything we need to know about this interaction, and to throw the cop under the bus.
Which is exactly what Ilhan Omar does.
The cops post other videos that show her just not following orders. And I’m sorry but when you don’t follow police orders, you’re kinda asking for it. Maybe follow what they say and file a complaint later about it instead of angrily arguing and risking a physical altercation.
More:
The subject was not injured, and she did not file a complaint. Efforts to contact her to obtain a statement as part of the use of force review process were unsuccessful.
So, if she didn’t file a complaint, why do we need to “reform” anything here? Omar assumes ill intent on behalf of the officer. Perhaps this was an unjust arrest. We don’t know if it was or not. But you definitely cannot judge whether it was or not just based on the snippet of video. No matter how hard Ilhan Omar would like it to be another reason for people to protest, loot, riot and destroy.


therightscoop--2020-06-08--George Bush says NY Times story on him not voting for Trump “completely made up”

George Bush sent his spokesperson out today to make sure everyone knows that the NY Times article over the weekend @ @ @ @ @ decided not to vote for Trump is completely made up : There was a flurry @ @ @ @ @ of those who ’ ve decided not to vote for Trump in November , including @ @ @ @ @ and John McCain ’ s widow .
I ’ m not sure why anyone cares @ @ @ @ @ , and neither Romney nor Powell are surprising .
Heck Powell campaigned for Obama .
@ @ @ @ @ out and pushed back against the story , but even if he does vote for @ @ @ @ @ see him donning a MAGA hat or campaigning for him .
Whatever Bush decides to @ @ @ @ @ ’ ll keep it private and hold to his tradition of staying out of presidential @ @

George Bush sent his spokesperson out today to make sure everyone knows that the NY Times article over the weekend that claimed he’d decided not to vote for Trump is completely made up:
In an email to @texastribune’s @ragajus, George W. Bush spox @kyfredchicken denies @nytimes report: "This is completely made up. He is retired from presidential politics and has not indicated how he will vote.” https://t.co/tWelJOqmhv https://t.co/RiHpmkfa5Z — Evan Smith (@evanasmith) June 7, 2020
There was a flurry of prominent names this weekend of those who’ve decided not to vote for Trump in November, including Mitt Romney, Colin Powell and John McCain’s widow. I’m not sure why anyone cares so much about the latter, and neither Romney nor Powell are surprising. Heck Powell campaigned for Obama.
I am glad Bush came out and pushed back against the story, but even if he does vote for Trump you won’t see him donning a MAGA hat or campaigning for him. Whatever Bush decides to do, I expect he’ll keep it private and hold to his tradition of staying out of presidential politics.


therightscoop--2020-06-08--SUPERCUT: The Democrat and media’s massive double standard on protests…

Tom Elliot over at Grabien has just put together a fantastic supercut exposing the blinding double standard from both Democrats @ @ @ @ @ : I bet you ’ d already forgotten all about those COVID-19 protests around the @ @ @ @ @ ?
No love for them whatsoever among the ranks of Democrats either .
But flip @ @ @ @ @ the George Floyd killing , which again was horrific , and suddenly the media and @ @ @ @ @ riots and looting as if they aren ’ t a big deal at all and @ @ @ @ @ protests .
Covid-19 what ?
Just amazing how blatant these people are with their double @ @ @ @ @ ahead and use this as an open thread :

Tom Elliot over at Grabien has just put together a fantastic supercut exposing the blinding double standard from both Democrats and the media on protests:
SUPERCUT! The media's super consistent messaging on protesting during Covid19 pic.twitter.com/Iq5hTJKcPO — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) June 8, 2020
I bet you’d already forgotten all about those COVID-19 protests around the country that the media hated? No love for them whatsoever among the ranks of Democrats either.
But flip the script to something like the George Floyd killing, which again was horrific, and suddenly the media and Democrats are playing down the riots and looting as if they aren’t a big deal at all and are love love loving the protests. Covid-19 what?
Just amazing how blatant these people are with their double standards and agendas.
Go ahead and use this as an open thread:
Guy rehabs a wild duckling — who flies back to visit with his girlfriend! pic.twitter.com/MfXEgkTdAp — The Dodo (@dodo) June 8, 2020


therightscoop--2020-06-08--Kayleigh McEnany smacks down AOC after she bites on Fake News

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany slapped down AOC after she bit on some Fake News .
It started with @ @ @ @ @ s Jake Sherman : He ’ s trying to suggest that AOC wasn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ .
The problem is it ’ s fake news .
AOC totally bites without double @ @ @ @ @ ‘ race ’ and going full victim : Kayleigh simply responds with the transcript , @ @ @ @ @ Rashida Tlaib and AOC as ‘ congresswomen ’ , telling AOC “ Read the transcript @ @ @ @ @ also checked AOC ’ s timeline and so far she hasn ’ t apologized or @ @ @ @ @ though she has tweeted since Kayleigh responded to her garbage accusation .
It just goes @ @ @ @ @ like AOC will despicably accuse someone of racism without even caring about the facts .
@ @ @ @ @ the Democratic Party .

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany slapped down AOC after she bit on some Fake News.
It started with this tweet from Politico’s Jake Sherman:
>@PressSec from the podium: “Biden adviser Alexandria Ocasio Cortez.” cc @AOC — Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) June 8, 2020
He’s trying to suggest that AOC wasn’t called by her official title. The problem is it’s fake news.
AOC totally bites without double checking, making it about ‘race’ and going full victim:
.@PressSec wouldn’t be the first person to mistake a women of color for having a lower position or title than she does, but Kayleigh – in case you haven’t picked up a newspaper in two years, I’m a Congresswoman. https://t.co/3FRHo7dpTL — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 8, 2020
The @PressSec comment is steeped in a long, hurtful, & horrendous history of stripping women of color of titles and diminishing them to “the help.” Perhaps she isn’t aware that what she did is mired in racist history. If that is the case, I look forward to her apology tomorrow. — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 8, 2020
Kayleigh simply responds with the transcript, where she referred to both Rashida Tlaib and AOC as ‘congresswomen’, telling AOC “Read the transcript, Congresswoman”:
The transcript is accurate. I double checked:
I also checked AOC’s timeline and so far she hasn’t apologized or responded to Kayleigh, even though she has tweeted since Kayleigh responded to her garbage accusation.
It just goes to show how quickly Democrats like AOC will despicably accuse someone of racism without even caring about the facts. She fits in well with the Democratic Party.


therightscoop--2020-06-08--Biden says NO to the defund the police movement

Biden is refusing to get onboard with the defend the police movement , saying today that he doesn ’ t believe the police should be defunded : POLITICO – A national movement to defund police is gathering steam — but former Vice President Joe Biden is not on board .
“ As his criminal justice proposal made clear months ago , Vice President Biden does not believe that police should be defunded , ” Biden spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement Monday afternoon .
The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee ’ s campaign stressed the need for law enforcement reforms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police hiring , and funding for body cameras .
Yet Biden ’ s desire for “ transformative change ” in the criminal justice system falls short of what many progressive activists are calling for in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd , a 46-year-old black man who died last month in Minneapolis .
“ Biden supports the urgent need for reform — including funding for public schools , summer programs , and mental health and substance abuse treatment separate from funding for policing — so that officers can focus on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
While Biden supports increased funding for some programs that activists support , the former vice president ’ s platform also calls for increasing investment in law enforcement , a stance that runs counter to what many protesters have called for .

Biden is refusing to get onboard with the defend the police movement, saying today that he doesn’t believe the police should be defunded:
POLITICO – A national movement to defund police is gathering steam — but former Vice President Joe Biden is not on board. “As his criminal justice proposal made clear months ago, Vice President Biden does not believe that police should be defunded,” Biden spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement Monday afternoon. The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee’s campaign stressed the need for law enforcement reforms like community policing, increased diversity in police hiring, and funding for body cameras. Yet Biden’s desire for “transformative change” in the criminal justice system falls short of what many progressive activists are calling for in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd, a 46-year-old black man who died last month in Minneapolis. “Biden supports the urgent need for reform — including funding for public schools, summer programs, and mental health and substance abuse treatment separate from funding for policing — so that officers can focus on the job of policing,” Bates said. While Biden supports increased funding for some programs that activists support, the former vice president’s platform also calls for increasing investment in law enforcement, a stance that runs counter to what many protesters have called for.
“The former vice president’s platform also calls for increasing investment in law enforcement…” Yeah, that’s the exact opposite of what the defunders want. I’m sure that’s going to go over well with them.
But for the rest of America, this was a smart move. If Biden had become the candidate for defunding, it would have made voting for Trump, as the law and order candidate, even easier for many in November.
By rejecting the defund movement, it at least keeps Biden and Trump on “equal footing”, at least in some people’s minds.


therightscoop--2020-06-08--Democrats kneel for over 8 minutes, present new anti-Police bill in latest 2020 kabuki theater

Democrats kneeled for over 8 minutes today before unveiling new anti-police legislation in their latest 2020 kabuki theater moves : If you watch for long enough , you ’ ll see Nadler is the only one standing , obviously because his knees aren ’ t good enough to kneel .
Democrats also held a press conference where they outright refused to criticize the defund police movement : This is one reason it ’ s kabuki theater .
Because if they supported the defund police movement they would be heavily criticized by Republicans and many Americans .
If they refused to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heavily criticized by the defund police movement itself , which would undermine their 2020 ‘ campaigning ’ effort today .
The other reason it ’ s kabuki theater is because the legislation isn ’ t serious : House and Senate Democrats introduced a sweeping police reform bill that would create a national reporting database and a ban on police use of the chokehold maneuver .
“ It is time for this , ” Sen. Kamala Harris , a California Democrat , said Monday .
The House bill would call for states to ban @ @ @ @ @ @ @ maneuver that places pressure on a person ’ s neck and restricts breathing .
It would ban the use of chokeholds by federal law enforcement and condition federal law enforcement funding for states on their banning the chokehold .
The measure would also require independent investigation and independent prosecution when police misuse deadly force and require a report to be filed with the state ’ s attorney general .
The measure would also change qualified immunity for police , making them accountable for deaths that occur by “ knowingly or reckless disregard ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Banning chokeholds would put police lives in danger .
As you well know , some suspects simply don ’ t want to submit to police authority and fight like hell to get free .
The use of chokeholds is a way for police to bring a suspects into submission .
If you take away chokeholds , then police will have less non-fatal tools in their toolbox to use when faced with a suspect like this , and it will put their lives in danger .
Reducing police immunity would also do serious damage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their job and protect the community .
As AG Barr said this weekend , it would cause officers to ‘ pull back ’ : The last thing we need is for police officers to fear doing their jobs because of increased liability .
The anti-cop bill is a complete non-starter .
If Democrats really wanted a bill that would pass , they would have negotiated with Republicans and the White House before putting this out .
This is simply a naked move by Democrats to try and win the votes of the defund @ @ @ @ @ @ @ toward any change .

Democrats kneeled for over 8 minutes today before unveiling new anti-police legislation in their latest 2020 kabuki theater moves:
House and Senate Democrats kneel for an 8 minute and 46 second moment of silence for George Floyd. pic.twitter.com/so3S7eBtna — Sarah Reese Jones (@PoliticusSarah) June 8, 2020
If you watch for long enough, you’ll see Nadler is the only one standing, obviously because his knees aren’t good enough to kneel.
Democrats also held a press conference where they outright refused to criticize the defund police movement:
This is one reason it’s kabuki theater. Because if they supported the defund police movement they would be heavily criticized by Republicans and many Americans. If they refused to support the defund movement they would be heavily criticized by the defund police movement itself, which would undermine their 2020 ‘campaigning’ effort today.
The other reason it’s kabuki theater is because the legislation isn’t serious:
House and Senate Democrats introduced a sweeping police reform bill that would create a national reporting database and a ban on police use of the chokehold maneuver. “It is time for this,” Sen. Kamala Harris, a California Democrat, said Monday. The House bill would call for states to ban police from using the chokehold or any maneuver that places pressure on a person’s neck and restricts breathing. It would ban the use of chokeholds by federal law enforcement and condition federal law enforcement funding for states on their banning the chokehold. The measure would also require independent investigation and independent prosecution when police misuse deadly force and require a report to be filed with the state’s attorney general. The measure would also change qualified immunity for police, making them accountable for deaths that occur by “knowingly or reckless disregard” for a person’s safety.
Banning chokeholds would put police lives in danger. As you well know, some suspects simply don’t want to submit to police authority and fight like hell to get free. The use of chokeholds is a way for police to bring a suspects into submission. If you take away chokeholds, then police will have less non-fatal tools in their toolbox to use when faced with a suspect like this, and it will put their lives in danger.
Reducing police immunity would also do serious damage to the ability of officers to do their job and protect the community. As AG Barr said this weekend, it would cause officers to ‘pull back’:
NEWS: AG Bill Barr tells @margbrennan “you don’t need to reduce immunity… to go after the bad cops” because it would result “in police pulling back.” https://t.co/AjYu0KVsDK pic.twitter.com/uJsSUjYQGW — Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) June 7, 2020
The last thing we need is for police officers to fear doing their jobs because of increased liability.
The anti-cop bill is a complete non-starter. If Democrats really wanted a bill that would pass, they would have negotiated with Republicans and the White House before putting this out. This is simply a naked move by Democrats to try and win the votes of the defund police movement and not a real move toward any change.


therightscoop--2020-06-08--WATCH LIVE: White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany holding daily press conference

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany is holding a daily press conference right now and you can watch it below @

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany is holding a daily press conference right now and you can watch it below:
WHITE HOUSE:
FOX NEWS:
PBS NEWSHOUR:


therightscoop--2020-06-08--Minneapolis City Council Pres says calling cops for a home break-in “comes from a place of privilege

Minneapolis City Council Pres says calling cops for a home break-in “comes from a place of privilege” – [VIDEO]

The ridiculousness of the Minneapolis City Council was on full display today as their president went on CNN and declared that calling the cops for a break-in at your home ‘ comes from a place of privilege ’ : CAMEROTA : “ What if in the middle of the night my home is broken into .
Who do I call ?
” BENDER : “ Yes , I hear that loud and clear from a lot of my neighbors .
And I know — and myself , too , and I know that that comes from a place of privilege @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whom the system is working , I think we need to step back and imagine what it would feel like to already live in that reality where calling the police may mean more harm done.
” These socialist agitators hate the police and view them as the enemy , which is just absurd .
Police officers put their lives on the line every day , and would rather things not escalate into violent confrontations because they want to go home too .
But unfortunately it happens , especially when young people are taught @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them as the enemy .
With respect to the ‘ privilege ’ assertion by this moron leftist , what complete and utter garbage .
I pay taxes just like the next guy and policing is a necessary ‘ service ’ provided by the city .
It ’ s not about privilege at all .
We the people demand law enforcement exist because we want policing , which is why we pay for it , just like we pay for other services for the city with our hard-earned tax dollars .
This is not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to reject these leftist losers and elect some competent officials before the city is ruined .

The ridiculousness of the Minneapolis City Council was on full display today as their president went on CNN and declared that calling the cops for a break-in at your home ‘comes from a place of privilege’:
CAMEROTA: "What if in the middle of the night my home is broken into. Who do I call?" BENDER: "Yes, I hear that loud and clear from a lot of my neighbors. And I know — and myself, too, and I know that that comes from a place of privilege." pic.twitter.com/WhubQ9yJIf — Eddie Zipperer (@EddieZipperer) June 8, 2020
Here’s a quick transcript:
CAMEROTA: “What if in the middle of the night my home is broken into. Who do I call?” BENDER: “Yes, I hear that loud and clear from a lot of my neighbors. And I know — and myself, too, and I know that that comes from a place of privilege. Because for those of us for whom the system is working, I think we need to step back and imagine what it would feel like to already live in that reality where calling the police may mean more harm done.”
These socialist agitators hate the police and view them as the enemy, which is just absurd. Police officers put their lives on the line every day, and would rather things not escalate into violent confrontations because they want to go home too. But unfortunately it happens, especially when young people are taught to hate the police and to view them as the enemy.
With respect to the ‘privilege’ assertion by this moron leftist, what complete and utter garbage. I pay taxes just like the next guy and policing is a necessary ‘service’ provided by the city. It’s not about privilege at all. We the people demand law enforcement exist because we want policing, which is why we pay for it, just like we pay for other services for the city with our hard-earned tax dollars. This is not hard.
The people of Minneapolis need to reject these leftist losers and elect some competent officials before the city is ruined.


therightscoop--2020-06-08--Police arrest 24-yr-old in the murder of Retired Police Captain David Dorn

Police have finally arrested the man who murdered Retired St. Louis Police Captain David Dorn : CBS NEWS – A 24-year-old St. Louis man has been charged with first-degree murder in the fatal shooting of a retired police captain who died on a night of violent protests while trying to protect his friend ’ s pawn shop , the city ’ s prosecutor announced Sunday .
Stephan Cannon was being held without bond on a first-degree murder charge in the death of David Dorn , 77 , who was killed Tuesday on the sidewalk outside Lee ’ s Pawn and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were caught on video and apparently posted on Facebook Live , though the video has since been taken down .
Dorn ’ s death came on a violent night in St. Louis , where four officers were shot , officers were pelted with rocks and fireworks , and 55 businesses were burglarized or damaged , including a convenience store that burned .
The unrest came as cities across the U.S. have seen protests and violence since George Floyd died May 25 after a white Minneapolis officer pressed his knee into Floyd ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the handcuffed black man stopped moving and pleading for air .
According to a police probable cause statement , Cannon was among those seen on surveillance footage entering the store and then stealing several televisions , The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported .
Dorn , a friend of the pawn shop ’ s owner who was in the habit of checking on the business when alarms went off , arrived at the store .
Cannon then walked toward the street corner with a gun in his hand .
Police said video shows Cannon pointing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ falling to the ground , according to CBS St. Louis affiliate KMOV-TV .
“ At the time the shots were fired , ( Cannon ) was the only person standing at that corner , ” the probable cause statement reads .
“ Multiple plumes of smoke ” can be seen coming from where Cannon was standing , and shell casings were found on the spot , police said .
KMOV says Dorn and two other people were seen getting in a car and driving away .
Cannon also faces several other charges including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ firearm .
Another man was arrested as well : “ [ Dorn ] was murdered by looters at a pawn shop .
He was the type of brother that would ’ ve given his life to save them if he had to , ” the Ethical Society of Police of St. Louis wrote after the murder , KMOV reports .
“ Violence is not the answer , whether it ’ s a citizen or officer.
” St. Louis police said they also arrested a second man , Jimmie Robinson , for taking part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him with burglary and armed criminal action .
Bond for him was set at $ 30,000 .
“ Porn shop thefts ” ?
I think they mean ‘ pawn shop thefts ’ .
Below are the mug shots of the men arrested :

Police have finally arrested the man who murdered Retired St. Louis Police Captain David Dorn:
CBS NEWS – A 24-year-old St. Louis man has been charged with first-degree murder in the fatal shooting of a retired police captain who died on a night of violent protests while trying to protect his friend’s pawn shop, the city’s prosecutor announced Sunday. Stephan Cannon was being held without bond on a first-degree murder charge in the death of David Dorn, 77, who was killed Tuesday on the sidewalk outside Lee’s Pawn and Jewelry. Dorn’s last moments were caught on video and apparently posted on Facebook Live, though the video has since been taken down. Dorn’s death came on a violent night in St. Louis, where four officers were shot, officers were pelted with rocks and fireworks, and 55 businesses were burglarized or damaged, including a convenience store that burned. The unrest came as cities across the U.S. have seen protests and violence since George Floyd died May 25 after a white Minneapolis officer pressed his knee into Floyd’s neck for several minutes, even after the handcuffed black man stopped moving and pleading for air. St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner announced the charges.
The evidence…
According to a police probable cause statement, Cannon was among those seen on surveillance footage entering the store and then stealing several televisions, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. Dorn, a friend of the pawn shop’s owner who was in the habit of checking on the business when alarms went off, arrived at the store. Cannon then walked toward the street corner with a gun in his hand. Police said video shows Cannon pointing the gun at Dorn and then Dorn falling to the ground, according to CBS St. Louis affiliate KMOV-TV. “At the time the shots were fired, (Cannon) was the only person standing at that corner,” the probable cause statement reads. “Multiple plumes of smoke” can be seen coming from where Cannon was standing, and shell casings were found on the spot, police said. KMOV says Dorn and two other people were seen getting in a car and driving away. Cannon also faces several other charges including robbery and felon in possession of a firearm.
Another man was arrested as well:
“[Dorn] was murdered by looters at a pawn shop. He was the type of brother that would’ve given his life to save them if he had to,” the Ethical Society of Police of St. Louis wrote after the murder, KMOV reports. “Violence is not the answer, whether it’s a citizen or officer.” St. Louis police said they also arrested a second man, Jimmie Robinson, for taking part in the porn shop thefts and charged him with burglary and armed criminal action. Bond for him was set at $30,000.
“Porn shop thefts”? I think they mean ‘pawn shop thefts’.
Below are the mug shots of the men arrested:
Stephen Cannon and Jimmie Robinson are behind bars this morning – charged in connection with Ret. STL Police Captain David Dorn's murder. I'll have more info at 6a & 6:30a on @ksdknews #TISL pic.twitter.com/EThFUsyTRt — Savannah Louie (@savannahKSDK) June 8, 2020


therightscoop--2020-06-08--Sen Ted Cruz calls the “time of death” for New York Times…

Yesterday we told you that the New York Times had purged their Opinion Editor and his deputy , all because they allowed Tom Cotton ’ s op-ed , a sitting US Senator , that called for sending in the troops to restore order in cities where riots and lawlessness abounded .
Today , in the wee hours of the morning , Ted Cruz responded to the news by calling the ‘ time of death ’ for the paper that was founded in 1851 , saying : '' The NYT literally fired their editorial page editor because he dared publish an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ totalitarian Left will brook no dissent .
To hell with Free Speech—we are Pravda .
New York Times : founded as an actual newspaper 9/18/1851 .
Died : 6/7/2020 . ''
Obviously the New York Times has been very biased in favor of Democrats and the Left for a long time .
But until now , the op-ed desk had at least allowed other opinions to be printed .
Now the opinion section is going to be as biased as the rest of the newspaper , only allowing opinions they agree with to @ @ @

Yesterday we told you that the New York Times had purged their Opinion Editor and his deputy, all because they allowed Tom Cotton’s op-ed, a sitting US Senator, that called for sending in the troops to restore order in cities where riots and lawlessness abounded. Today, in the wee hours of the morning, Ted Cruz responded to the news by calling the ‘time of death’ for the paper that was founded in 1851, saying:
"The NYT literally fired their editorial page editor because he dared publish an op-ed that Leftists disagreed with. The totalitarian Left will brook no dissent. To hell with Free Speech—we are Pravda. New York Times: founded as an actual newspaper 9/18/1851. Died: 6/7/2020."
The NYT literally fired their editorial page editor because he dared publish an op-ed that Leftists disagreed with. The totalitarian Left will brook no dissent. To hell with Free Speech—we are Pravda. New York Times: founded as an actual newspaper 9/18/1851. Died: 6/7/2020. https://t.co/YIzBihdhtO — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) June 8, 2020
Obviously the New York Times has been very biased in favor of Democrats and the Left for a long time. But until now, the op-ed desk had at least allowed other opinions to be printed. Now the opinion section is going to be as biased as the rest of the newspaper, only allowing opinions they agree with to be printed.
Cruz is right. Pravda.


therightscoop--2020-06-08--New York Post slams de Blasio as betraying New York Police after he promises to partially defund NYP

New York Post slams de Blasio as betraying New York Police after he promises to partially defund NYPD

The New York front cover this morning torches Mayor de Blasio for betraying police after promising to partially defund the NYPD and send that money to ‘ youth programs ’ : As the Post points out in the blurb , de Blasio earlier refused to defund the NYPD .
But now , because the crowd is calling for him to resign , he ’ s flip flopping and promising to cut the budget , while nearly 300 officers have been injured trying to keep the peace .
It ’ s absolutely a betrayal of police , but it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his city who will surely suffer as the NYPD loses staffing and funding .
De Blasio explained this on CNN this morning , saying the funding will go to keep young people away from negative influences and crime , but they NYPD will still be able to keep people safe : In other words De Blasio is trying to turn the city into ‘ mommy and daddy ’ because too many kids are out on the streets while their single parents are working to make ends meet .
It ’ s the result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the rejection of morality and thus the breakdown of the family , leading to chaos on city streets as kids get involved in gangs for protection and thus crime and violence .
And now the entire city will suffer as funding that should go to the NYPD is diverted into these ‘ youth programs ’ to try and save the youth .
The truth is that New York City is in a far better place in terms of crime than it used to be thanks to Giuliani , but you can expect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Blasio begins defunding the police so he can keep his job .

The New York front cover this morning torches Mayor de Blasio for betraying police after promising to partially defund the NYPD and send that money to ‘youth programs’:
As the Post points out in the blurb, de Blasio earlier refused to defund the NYPD. But now, because the crowd is calling for him to resign, he’s flip flopping and promising to cut the budget, while nearly 300 officers have been injured trying to keep the peace.
It’s absolutely a betrayal of police, but it’s also a betrayal of the members of his city who will surely suffer as the NYPD loses staffing and funding.
De Blasio explained this on CNN this morning, saying the funding will go to keep young people away from negative influences and crime, but they NYPD will still be able to keep people safe:
NYC Mayor de Blasio explains his new promise to reduce the NYPD budget: "We're going to be able to take money out of that police force, put it into youth programs and still of course keep New Yorkers safe." pic.twitter.com/oBdUYJ23Jd — The Recount (@therecount) June 8, 2020
In other words De Blasio is trying to turn the city into ‘mommy and daddy’ because too many kids are out on the streets while their single parents are working to make ends meet. It’s the result of removing God from society, leading to the rejection of morality and thus the breakdown of the family, leading to chaos on city streets as kids get involved in gangs for protection and thus crime and violence.
And now the entire city will suffer as funding that should go to the NYPD is diverted into these ‘youth programs’ to try and save the youth.
The truth is that New York City is in a far better place in terms of crime than it used to be thanks to Giuliani, but you can expect the city to regress backward as de Blasio begins defunding the police so he can keep his job.


therightscoop--2020-06-09--WATCH: Turns out Biden is trying to have it both ways on defunding the police…

Biden was asked today by CBS Evening News anchor Norah O ’ Donnell if he supported defunding the police : No , I don ’ t support defunding the police .
I support conditioning federal aid to police based on whether or not they meet certain basic standards of decency and honorableness and in fact are able to demonstrate they can protect the community and everybody in the community .
So Biden doesn ’ t support defunding the police , but he does support conditionally barring federal aid to police departments which , unless I ’ m mistaken , is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Unless of course they can prove they are honorable and decent , whatever in the heck that means .
Honestly , I ’ ve no idea what Biden is talking about here .
This is a bunch of political mumbo jumbo .
He ’ s using such generic and vague language that he can later define it to mean whatever he wants it to mean .
I think he ’ s trying to have his cake and eat it to , which isn ’ t going to work for these radicals on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the country .
You are either with them or against them .

Biden was asked today by CBS Evening News anchor Norah O’Donnell if he supported defunding the police:
Here’s what Biden said:
No, I don’t support defunding the police. I support conditioning federal aid to police based on whether or not they meet certain basic standards of decency and honorableness and in fact are able to demonstrate they can protect the community and everybody in the community.
So Biden doesn’t support defunding the police, but he does support conditionally barring federal aid to police departments which, unless I’m mistaken, is the same as defunding the police.
Unless of course they can prove they are honorable and decent, whatever in the heck that means. Honestly, I’ve no idea what Biden is talking about here. This is a bunch of political mumbo jumbo. He’s using such generic and vague language that he can later define it to mean whatever he wants it to mean.
I think he’s trying to have his cake and eat it to, which isn’t going to work for these radicals on the streets wanting to defund police departments across the country. You are either with them or against them.


therightscoop--2020-06-09--WATCH: AG Barr supports the banning of chokeholds, but not in all situations…

AG Barr said tonight that he supports the idea of banning chokeholds from law enforcement engagements , but not in all circumstances .
I ’ ve cued up the video to begin at 4:59 : Barr is first asked about Democrats wanting to create a national misconduct register for police in their new legislation , and I thought he gave a great answer to that : There ’ s a prudent balance to be struck between making sure we can hold wrongdoers accountable .
Policing is not like sitting in an office checking boxes .
We put these individuals in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own life is at stake , their adrenaline is pumping and so forth .
And we have to make sure we treat them fairly in those kind of circumstances .
He was then asked about chokeholds : I think we should ban chokeholds , lateral chokeholds…unless a police officer is confronted with potentially lethal force .
But I think there is a general agreement among police agencies that we need clearer standards .
We have to make sure those standards are trained to , and we have to make sure there are systems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I think there is universal agreement on that .
That ’ s somewhat similar to what I was getting at earlier , but phrased in a much better way .
In setting where the officer isn ’ t threatened with lethal force , Barr is saying it ’ s okay to ban chokeholds .
I can go along with that .
But when an officer is threatened with potentially lethal force , police officers need the ability to use chokeholds to defend themselves and subdue their attacker .
Exactly my point .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outright , and that would indeed put police officer ’ s lives in danger .

AG Barr said tonight that he supports the idea of banning chokeholds from law enforcement engagements, but not in all circumstances. I’ve cued up the video to begin at 4:59:
Barr is first asked about Democrats wanting to create a national misconduct register for police in their new legislation, and I thought he gave a great answer to that:
There’s a prudent balance to be struck between making sure we can hold wrongdoers accountable. Policing is not like sitting in an office checking boxes. We put these individuals in highly charged, dangerous situations where their own life is at stake, their adrenaline is pumping and so forth. And we have to make sure we treat them fairly in those kind of circumstances.
He was then asked about chokeholds:
I think we should ban chokeholds, lateral chokeholds…unless a police officer is confronted with potentially lethal force. But I think there is a general agreement among police agencies that we need clearer standards. We have to make sure those standards are trained to, and we have to make sure there are systems in place that hold officers accountable. I think there is universal agreement on that.
That’s somewhat similar to what I was getting at earlier, but phrased in a much better way. In setting where the officer isn’t threatened with lethal force, Barr is saying it’s okay to ban chokeholds. I can go along with that. But when an officer is threatened with potentially lethal force, police officers need the ability to use chokeholds to defend themselves and subdue their attacker. Exactly my point.
The problem is Democrats want to ban them outright, and that would indeed put police officer’s lives in danger.