therightscoop--2020-12-14--New email reveals Joe and Hunter Biden were “office mates” with Chinese business partner

A new email which came out this weekend reveals that Hunter Biden set up an office for the Biden crime family in 2017 and both his father and a Chinese business partner got keys : NEWSMAX – An email from 2017 reveals that Hunter Biden referred to both his father , Joe Biden and his Chinese business partner , as well as his stepmother and uncle as “ office mates ” at his former office building in Washington D.C. and asked keys be made for them , according to a new report .
“ [ P ] lease have keys @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Hunter Biden wrote in the email , dated Sept. 21 , 2017 .
He then listed the office mates as his father , his stepmother Jill Biden , his uncle Jim Biden , and Gongwen Dong , calling him the “ emissary ” for the chairman of Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC , reports The Daily Caller , which obtained a copy of the documents .
He also asked a sign be made for his office calling it “ The Biden Foundation ” and “ Hudson West ( CEFC US ) .
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the general manager of the office building , the House of Sweden .
She responded , she was “ very excited and honored to welcome your new colleagues !
” She did not dispute the authenticity of the emails when the Daily Caller forwarded them to her for review Friday , but she also declined to comment on them .
The dealings between Hunter Biden and CEFC in 2017 were the focus of allegations from his former business partner , Tony Bobulinski , who said in October that Joe Biden had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dealings of his family in China .
Biden has denied any knowledge of his son ’ s business activities .

A new email which came out this weekend reveals that Hunter Biden set up an office for the Biden crime family in 2017 and both his father and a Chinese business partner got keys:
NEWSMAX – An email from 2017 reveals that Hunter Biden referred to both his father, Joe Biden and his Chinese business partner, as well as his stepmother and uncle as “office mates” at his former office building in Washington D.C. and asked keys be made for them, according to a new report.
“[P]lease have keys made available for new office mates,” Hunter Biden wrote in the email, dated Sept. 21, 2017.
He then listed the office mates as his father, his stepmother Jill Biden, his uncle Jim Biden, and Gongwen Dong, calling him the “emissary” for the chairman of Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC, reports The Daily Caller, which obtained a copy of the documents.
He also asked a sign be made for his office calling it “The Biden Foundation” and “Hudson West (CEFC US).”
The email was sent to Cecilia Browning, the general manager of the office building, the House of Sweden. She responded, she was “very excited and honored to welcome your new colleagues!”
She did not dispute the authenticity of the emails when the Daily Caller forwarded them to her for review Friday, but she also declined to comment on them.
The dealings between Hunter Biden and CEFC in 2017 were the focus of allegations from his former business partner, Tony Bobulinski, who said in October that Joe Biden had been “plainly familiar” with the business dealings of his family in China. Biden has denied any knowledge of his son’s business activities.


therightscoop--2020-12-14--WATCH LIVE: The Arizona Senate holds hearing on election fraud (already in progress)

The Arizona Senate Judiciary committee is holding a hearing on election fraud and you can watch below : These kinds @ @ @ @ @ , regardless of the outcome of the November election , so I hope you ’ @ @ @ @ @ states need to fix the problems that led to the massive voter fraud that apparently @ @ @ @ @ to fix things wants to talk about .
More important that the winner is the @ @ @ @ @ in our elections .
If it doesn ’ t get fixed people will simply stop @ @ @ @ @ the day .

The Arizona Senate Judiciary committee is holding a hearing on election fraud and you can watch below:
These kinds of hearings are very important, regardless of the outcome of the November election, so I hope you’ll tune in.
The states need to fix the problems that led to the massive voter fraud that apparently no one with the power to fix things wants to talk about.
More important that the winner is the American people’s trust in our elections. If it doesn’t get fixed people will simply stop voting and socialism will win the day.


therightscoop--2020-12-14--REPORT: Treasury and Commerce departments BREACHED by Russian hackers who spied on US for MONTHS

It was reported yesterday evening that there has been a very serious breach by Russian hackers at both the US Treasury and Commerce departments .
The hackers are believed to have spied on the US for months .
The breach was so serious the National Security Council held an emergency meeting on Saturday : FOX BUSINESS – The U.S. government has acknowledged reports that hackers backed by a foreign government have breached the U.S. Treasury Department and an agency within the Commerce Department .
“ The United States government is aware of these reports and we are taking all necessary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issues related to this situation , ” National Security Council spokesman John Ullyot told FOX Business in a statement .
According to Reuters , the elaborate cyber hack was launched on the Treasury Department as well as the Commerce Department ’ s National Telecommunications and Information Administration , or NTIA , a U.S. agency that is tasked with crafting internet and telecommunications policy .
Sources told the outlet that the hack was so serious it led to a National Security Council meeting on Saturday .
Hackers reportedly used the organization ’ s Microsoft @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emails for months .
A Treasury Deparment spokesperson deferred comment to the NSC .
A spokesperson for the Commerce Department confirmed the breach , adding that it has “ asked CISA and the FBI to investigate ” but declining to comment any further .
A Microsoft spokesperson declined to comment to FOX Business .
The Department of Homeland Security ’ s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency , or CISA , said in a statement that the agency has been working closely with its partners regarding “ recently discovered activity on government networks.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ affected entities as they work to identify and mitigate any potential compromises , ” the spokesperson added .
An FBI spokesperson said it can “ neither confirm nor deny details related to any ongoing investigation , ” citing the agency ’ s standard practice .

It was reported yesterday evening that there has been a very serious breach by Russian hackers at both the US Treasury and Commerce departments. The hackers are believed to have spied on the US for months. The breach was so serious the National Security Council held an emergency meeting on Saturday:
FOX BUSINESS – The U.S. government has acknowledged reports that hackers backed by a foreign government have breached the U.S. Treasury Department and an agency within the Commerce Department.
“The United States government is aware of these reports and we are taking all necessary steps to identify and remedy any possible issues related to this situation,” National Security Council spokesman John Ullyot told FOX Business in a statement.
According to Reuters, the elaborate cyber hack was launched on the Treasury Department as well as the Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration, or NTIA, a U.S. agency that is tasked with crafting internet and telecommunications policy. Sources told the outlet that the hack was so serious it led to a National Security Council meeting on Saturday.
Hackers reportedly used the organization’s Microsoft Office 365 platform to monitor staff members emails for months.
A Treasury Deparment spokesperson deferred comment to the NSC. A spokesperson for the Commerce Department confirmed the breach, adding that it has “asked CISA and the FBI to investigate” but declining to comment any further. A Microsoft spokesperson declined to comment to FOX Business.
The Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA, said in a statement that the agency has been working closely with its partners regarding “recently discovered activity on government networks.”
“CISA is providing technical assistance to affected entities as they work to identify and mitigate any potential compromises,” the spokesperson added.
An FBI spokesperson said it can “neither confirm nor deny details related to any ongoing investigation,” citing the agency’s standard practice.


therightscoop--2020-12-16--CNN smears Melania Trump for taking off her mask at hospital, then REFUSES to correct misreporting w

CNN smears Melania Trump for taking off her mask at hospital, then REFUSES to correct misreporting when proven WRONG

CNN smeared Melania Trump today for taking off her mask at a Children ’ s hospital while she read a book , claiming she ‘ broke ’ the hospital ’ s mask policies : First lady Melania Trump broke stated mask policy at Children ’ s National Hospital Tuesday when she removed her mask to read a holiday book to children .
Trump , who has visited children at the hospital each year during her time as first lady , continued the tradition despite the coronavirus pandemic and record cases in Washington , DC .
The first lady arrived in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a mask .
When she took her seat in front of a tree , she removed the mask .
Though she practiced social distancing , the hospital ’ s policy specifically requires all visitors to wear a mask .
“ Everyone must wear a mask at all times while in any Children ’ s National facility to prevent the spread of COVID-19 , ” the hospital ’ s policy says .
That includes “ wearing a mask when entering any Children ’ s National building , as mandated by area officials .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the hallway and cafeteria , ” and “ wearing a mask at all times when you are around other individuals.
” The first lady ’ s office did not immediately respond to CNN ’ s request for comment on why she removed her mask and whether she got special permission to do so .
Here ’ s video of the incident from The Hill , who also spread this around today : Stephanie Grisham did respond , however , by tweeting a few minutes ago that Melania broke no hospital mask policies and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ explaining their policy : The hospital clearly stated that Melania did follow their mask protocols for public speakers , which they say is NOT on the website .
But instead of asking first , CNN ’ s Betsy Klein rushed to the keyboard to publish this garbage .
Note that in the tweet , Grisham says “ Yet another false attack on @ FLOTUS by @ CNN .
Running an inaccurate headline that willfully contradicts the statement made by the hospital .
Despite our request , they refuse to update their headline.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refuse to update their headline or their reporting .
They ’ ve even added the statement from the hospital on the bottom half of the article ( which most won ’ t read ) , but refuse to change their false headline and false reporting in the top half ( which most will read ) .
I can attest to this because the snippet I posted above came after they added the statement from the hospital .
So much for calling a banana a banana .
Well , that ship sailed years ago @

CNN smeared Melania Trump today for taking off her mask at a Children’s hospital while she read a book, claiming she ‘broke’ the hospital’s mask policies:
First lady Melania Trump broke stated mask policy at Children’s National Hospital Tuesday when she removed her mask to read a holiday book to children. Trump, who has visited children at the hospital each year during her time as first lady, continued the tradition despite the coronavirus pandemic and record cases in Washington, DC. The first lady arrived in the hospital’s main atrium wearing a mask. When she took her seat in front of a tree, she removed the mask. Though she practiced social distancing, the hospital’s policy specifically requires all visitors to wear a mask. “Everyone must wear a mask at all times while in any Children’s National facility to prevent the spread of COVID-19,” the hospital’s policy says. That includes “wearing a mask when entering any Children’s National building, as mandated by area officials. This includes all public places, such as the hallway and cafeteria,” and “wearing a mask at all times when you are around other individuals.” The first lady’s office did not immediately respond to CNN’s request for comment on why she removed her mask and whether she got special permission to do so.
Here’s video of the incident from The Hill, who also spread this around today:
Stephanie Grisham did respond, however, by tweeting a few minutes ago that Melania broke no hospital mask policies and even tweeted a statement from the hospital explaining their policy:
The hospital clearly stated that Melania did follow their mask protocols for public speakers, which they say is NOT on the website. But instead of asking first, CNN’s Betsy Klein rushed to the keyboard to publish this garbage.
Note that in the tweet, Grisham says “Yet another false attack on @FLOTUS by @CNN. Running an inaccurate headline that willfully contradicts the statement made by the hospital. Despite our request, they refuse to update their headline.”
It’s true, they do refuse to update their headline or their reporting. They’ve even added the statement from the hospital on the bottom half of the article (which most won’t read), but refuse to change their false headline and false reporting in the top half (which most will read). I can attest to this because the snippet I posted above came after they added the statement from the hospital.
So much for calling a banana a banana. Well, that ship sailed years ago.


therightscoop--2020-12-16--WATCH: Gov DeSantis won’t kowtow to reporter and call Biden ‘president-elect’

Governor Ron DeSantis was asked by a reporter today the only question on their minds when it comes to a Biden presidency : The question from the reporter was “ will you accept Joe Biden as president-elect ?
” DeSantis refuses to do so and explains why : “ It ’ s not for me to do .
We ’ ll here ’ s what I would say .
Obviously we did our thing in Florida , the college voted… But I can tell you I think a lot of the frustration for folks that supported the president is that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him .
I mean Hillary , the last week of the election was saying Putin stole it.
” That ’ s where the video stops and I haven ’ t been able to find a longer one to hear if his answer continued .
But I like that he gave an honest and truthful answer about what the frustrations of Trump supporters .
Democrats attempted a coup against Trump before he even got into office , and spent the next 2-3 years trying to impeach him .
And now they want to demand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden ’ s ring even though there ’ s still an election challenge happening ?
In the words of a great philosopher , “ hard pass ” .

Governor Ron DeSantis was asked by a reporter today the only question on their minds when it comes to a Biden presidency:
The question from the reporter was “will you accept Joe Biden as president-elect?” DeSantis refuses to do so and explains why:
“It’s not for me to do. We’ll here’s what I would say. Obviously we did our thing in Florida, the college voted… But I can tell you I think a lot of the frustration for folks that supported the president is that we were four years without people accepting him. I mean Hillary, the last week of the election was saying Putin stole it.”
That’s where the video stops and I haven’t been able to find a longer one to hear if his answer continued. But I like that he gave an honest and truthful answer about what the frustrations of Trump supporters. Democrats attempted a coup against Trump before he even got into office, and spent the next 2-3 years trying to impeach him. And now they want to demand that every Republican bow down and kiss Biden’s ring even though there’s still an election challenge happening? In the words of a great philosopher, “hard pass”.


therightscoop--2020-12-15--House Republican plans to OBJECT to specific electoral votes in January, calls on any Senator to sta

House Republican plans to OBJECT to specific electoral votes in January, calls on any Senator to stand with him!

House Republican Mel Brooks told Lou Dobbs last night that he plans on objecting to the electoral votes from several states with ‘ flawed systems ’ on January 6th and is calling on any other Republican Senator to stand with him : At the beginning of the interview , Brooks was quick to note that objecting to electoral votes is not uncommon : Well it ’ s happened many times in the past – apparently some folks have no done their history .
By way of example , Democrats in the House tried it in 2017 when they tried to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump .
Georgia the same way , when House Democrats tried to strike it .
Barbara Boxer tried to strike Ohio for George Bush back in 2005 .
So this is not unusual , the law is very clear .
The House of Representatives in combination with the United States Senate has the lawful authority to accept or reject electoral college vote submissions from states that have such flawed election systems that their not worthy of our trust .
Brooks said he intends to object to the electoral college votes from several of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ US Senator to do the same so they can force a vote : So I have a choice , I can either sit back and surrender and be a part of the surrender caucus , or I can fight for our country .
And that ’ s what I ’ m going to do .
So on January 6 , I ’ m going to object to the submissions of Electoral College votes from various states that , in my judgment , have such flawed election systems that their vote counts are unworthy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Congress .
What I need is a United States Senator who will join me .
If we have a House member and a senator , then by golly , that forces a House vote and a floor vote on whether to accept this systematically flawed election system or to reject it .
I want to reject it so that we can have an honest and fair and accurate election.
” The question is will any GOP Senator risk taking fire from the Democrat propaganda machine and stand with Brooks in this fight to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the answer is an easy yes , but don ’ t expect it to be McConnell or any of his squishes : The pressure is on .
Who will buck McConnell ?

House Republican Mel Brooks told Lou Dobbs last night that he plans on objecting to the electoral votes from several states with ‘flawed systems’ on January 6th and is calling on any other Republican Senator to stand with him:
Congressional Challenge: @RepMoBrooks calls out the GOP’s Surrender Caucus, who refuse to join in with his plan to challenge fraudulent electoral college votes. #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs pic.twitter.com/G4WLPSrvOO — Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs) December 14, 2020
At the beginning of the interview, Brooks was quick to note that objecting to electoral votes is not uncommon:
Well it’s happened many times in the past – apparently some folks have no done their history. By way of example, Democrats in the House tried it in 2017 when they tried to strike Alabama’s votes for Donald Trump. Georgia the same way, when House Democrats tried to strike it. Barbara Boxer tried to strike Ohio for George Bush back in 2005. So this is not unusual, the law is very clear. The House of Representatives in combination with the United States Senate has the lawful authority to accept or reject electoral college vote submissions from states that have such flawed election systems that their not worthy of our trust.
Brooks said he intends to object to the electoral college votes from several of these states and is asking for any US Senator to do the same so they can force a vote:
So I have a choice, I can either sit back and surrender and be a part of the surrender caucus, or I can fight for our country. And that’s what I’m going to do. So on January 6, I’m going to object to the submissions of Electoral College votes from various states that, in my judgment, have such flawed election systems that their vote counts are unworthy of our ratification in the United States Congress. What I need is a United States Senator who will join me. If we have a House member and a senator, then by golly, that forces a House vote and a floor vote on whether to accept this systematically flawed election system or to reject it. I want to reject it so that we can have an honest and fair and accurate election.”
The question is will any GOP Senator risk taking fire from the Democrat propaganda machine and stand with Brooks in this fight to force a vote? I would hope the answer is an easy yes, but don’t expect it to be McConnell or any of his squishes:
“McConnell told his caucus that challenging the results would force Republicans to take a “terrible vote” because they would need to vote it down and appear against President Donald Trump. Senate Majority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) also echoed McConnell’s remarks.”
The pressure is on. Who will buck McConnell?


therightscoop--2020-12-15--California Sheriff REFUSES judge’s order to release 1800 prisoners due to COVID

A California Sheriff is standing up to an absurd ruling by a judge compels him to release 1800 serious and violent offenders , saying he has no intention of complying with the order : Orange County , Calif. , Sheriff Don Barnes pushed back against an “ absurd ” order from a local Superior Court judge ordering the release of 1,800 inmates , including some who are locked up for murder and child molestation , due to the coronavirus .
“ I have no intention of doing that , of releasing those individuals back into the community .
I think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Barnes told “ Fox & Friends.
” The decision by the court was made in response to an April lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union ( ACLU ) in an effort to protect disabled and medically vulnerable people at the Orange County Jail , reports said , but Barnes plans to appeal .
“ We ’ ve released 1,400 inmates to date since March for low-level offenders .
The only inmates remaining now are serious offenders , ” he explained .
“ Of the medically vulnerable , 90 of them are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 94 for child molestation.
” In the order , Judge Peter Wilson wrote that Barnes ’ “ deliberate indifference to the substantial risk of serious harm from COVID-19 infection to … medically vulnerable people in [ his ] custody violates their rights , ” according to KCBS-TV of Los Angeles .
“ Everybody in the community is at risk of COVID right now , ” Barnes said in response to the judge , adding , “ not considering the risk to the public they present by being released back into the community @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I think it places the community at significant risk … ”

A California Sheriff is standing up to an absurd ruling by a judge compels him to release 1800 serious and violent offenders, saying he has no intention of complying with the order:
Watch the latest video at foxnews.com
Here’s more from Fox News:
Orange County, Calif., Sheriff Don Barnes pushed back against an “absurd” order from a local Superior Court judge ordering the release of 1,800 inmates, including some who are locked up for murder and child molestation, due to the coronavirus.
“I have no intention of doing that, of releasing those individuals back into the community. I think they pose a serious threat,” Barnes told “Fox & Friends.”
The decision by the court was made in response to an April lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in an effort to protect disabled and medically vulnerable people at the Orange County Jail, reports said, but Barnes plans to appeal.
“We’ve released 1,400 inmates to date since March for low-level offenders. The only inmates remaining now are serious offenders,” he explained. “Of the medically vulnerable, 90 of them are in custody for murder or attempted murder, 94 for child molestation.”
In the order, Judge Peter Wilson wrote that Barnes’ “deliberate indifference to the substantial risk of serious harm from COVID-19 infection to … medically vulnerable people in [his] custody violates their rights,” according to KCBS-TV of Los Angeles.
“Everybody in the community is at risk of COVID right now,” Barnes said in response to the judge, adding, “not considering the risk to the public they present by being released back into the community, I think is not only absurd, I think it places the community at significant risk …”


therightscoop--2020-12-15--Supreme Court sides with churches, synagogues over heavy-handed coronavirus lockdowns

The Supreme Court today sided with churches and synagogues in both Colorado and New Jersey over heavy-handed coronavirus policies that severely restricted how many could worship : NBC NEWS – The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled in favor of houses of worship in Colorado and New Jersey that opposed capacity limits on worship services .
In the Colorado case , the court ruled 6-3 to send the lawsuit , brought by the High Plains Harvest Church , back to the lower courts , where the church had lost .
Justices Stephen Breyer , Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Colorado had already lifted all the limits .
“ There is no reason to think Colorado will reverse course — and so no reason to think Harvest Church will again face capacity limits , ” the dissent said .
The 150-seat church filed suit in May , arguing Colorado Gov .
Jared Polis ’ order capping attendance to 50 people was too restrictive .
Lower court judges had refused to sign off on an order that would have made the church exempt from those restrictions .
The high court said the lower court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of its ruling in a similar case involving New York last month .
In a second ruling Tuesday , the Supreme Court issued a ruling limiting New Jersey ’ s application of Covid-19 restrictions that apply to religious settings , granting an injunction sought by two religious institutions — a church in North Caldwell and a synagogue in Lakewood .
The church and synagogue asked for an injunction allowing them “ to host indoor , in-person religious worship for their respective congregations on the same terms and conditions allowed for comparable secular activities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % of capacity afforded ‘ essential ’ non-retail businesses or , alternatively , the 50 % of capacity allowed for ‘ essential ’ retail businesses , with the same health and safety protocols and exemptions applicable to comparable secular activities .
”

The Supreme Court today sided with churches and synagogues in both Colorado and New Jersey over heavy-handed coronavirus policies that severely restricted how many could worship:
NBC NEWS – The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled in favor of houses of worship in Colorado and New Jersey that opposed capacity limits on worship services.
In the Colorado case, the court ruled 6-3 to send the lawsuit, brought by the High Plains Harvest Church, back to the lower courts, where the church had lost.
Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissented, saying the case was moot because Colorado had already lifted all the limits. “There is no reason to think Colorado will reverse course — and so no reason to think Harvest Church will again face capacity limits,” the dissent said.
The 150-seat church filed suit in May, arguing Colorado Gov. Jared Polis’ order capping attendance to 50 people was too restrictive. Lower court judges had refused to sign off on an order that would have made the church exempt from those restrictions.
The high court said the lower court judges should review the case in light of its ruling in a similar case involving New York last month.
In a second ruling Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued a ruling limiting New Jersey’s application of Covid-19 restrictions that apply to religious settings, granting an injunction sought by two religious institutions — a church in North Caldwell and a synagogue in Lakewood.
The church and synagogue asked for an injunction allowing them “to host indoor, in-person religious worship for their respective congregations on the same terms and conditions allowed for comparable secular activities; that is, either the 100% of capacity afforded ‘essential’ non-retail businesses or, alternatively, the 50% of capacity allowed for ‘essential’ retail businesses, with the same health and safety protocols and exemptions applicable to comparable secular activities.”


therightscoop--2020-12-15--Mark Levin slams McConnell for congratulating Biden today as ‘president-elect’

Mark Levin ripped into McConnell today for not waiting until January 6th to congratulate Biden on being ‘ president-elect ’ : “ 1 .
I think we should all thank McConnell for his excellent help in challenging the lawless acts of the Biden campaign and Democrats in the key battleground states .
Wait , he was AWOL ?
Oh , well then , thanks for nothing , Mitch .
2 .
Trump helped you secure your seat , as he did so many Senate and House seats , and you couldn ’ t even wait until January 6th .
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” in the Senate for far too long .
It ’ s time for some fresh thinking and new blood.
” To those of you who disagreed with me on McConnell today , you are in good company .
Levin also makes a great point about the work Trump did to try and keep the Senate and regain the House and all that McConnell didn ’ t to do fight for Trump ’ s reelection .
However , more than all of that , he ’ s absolutely right that we need new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think of no one better suited for the task than Ted Cruz .
But that ’ ll never happen was long as McConnell keeps fighting against electing conservatives and for more squishy Senators made in his image .

Mark Levin ripped into McConnell today for not waiting until January 6th to congratulate Biden on being ‘president-elect’:
1. I think we should all thank McConnell for his excellent help in challenging the lawless acts of the Biden campaign and Democrats in the key battleground states. Wait, he was AWOL? Oh, well then, thanks for nothing, Mitch. — Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) December 15, 2020
2. Trump helped you secure your seat, as he did so man Senate and House seats, and you couldn't even wait until January 6th. You've been the GOP "leader" in the Senate for far too long. It's time for some fresh thinking and new blood.https://t.co/ucaa2cmmcQ — Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) December 15, 2020
Levin writes:
“1. I think we should all thank McConnell for his excellent help in challenging the lawless acts of the Biden campaign and Democrats in the key battleground states. Wait, he was AWOL? Oh, well then, thanks for nothing, Mitch. 2. Trump helped you secure your seat, as he did so many Senate and House seats, and you couldn’t even wait until January 6th. You’ve been the GOP “leader” in the Senate for far too long. It’s time for some fresh thinking and new blood.”
To those of you who disagreed with me on McConnell today, you are in good company. Levin also makes a great point about the work Trump did to try and keep the Senate and regain the House and all that McConnell didn’t to do fight for Trump’s reelection.
However, more than all of that, he’s absolutely right that we need new leadership in the Senate. I can think of no one better suited for the task than Ted Cruz. But that’ll never happen was long as McConnell keeps fighting against electing conservatives and for more squishy Senators made in his image.


therightscoop--2020-12-15--WATCH LIVE: Kayleigh McEnany holds White House press briefing at 1PM

Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany is holding a White House press briefing at 1PM and you can watch it below : @ @ @ @ @ question being asked by obnoxious reporters today in this press conference , and that ’ @ @ @ @ @ Kayleigh will call Biden ‘ president-elect ’ .
And they will persist in trying to @ @ @ @ @ fact that they won ’ t bow and kiss Biden ’ s ring .

Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany is holding a White House press briefing at 1PM and you can watch it below:
RSB:
FOX NEWS:
PBS NEWSHOUR:
You can bet on one question being asked by obnoxious reporters today in this press conference, and that’s whether Trump or even Kayleigh will call Biden ‘president-elect’. And they will persist in trying to make a spectacle of the fact that they won’t bow and kiss Biden’s ring.
WHILE YOU WAIT:
When this grumpy cat finally gives his brother a kiss for the first time 😍 pic.twitter.com/gYZdzXG0HO — The Dodo (@dodo) December 15, 2020


therightscoop--2020-12-15--[VIDEO] – McConnell congratulates Joe Biden as president-elect – [UPDATE: NEWSMAX TOO]

Mitch McConnell just congratulated Joe Biden as president-elect on the Senate floor : I know this will make me unpopular , but I really don ’ t think it ’ s unreasonable for McConnell to congratulate Biden at this point .
He ’ s waited for the past six weeks , refusing to do this when the media was demanding everyone bow to Biden and kiss his ring .
And now , after Trump ’ s biggest election challenges have been rejected by the courts and electors around the country officially voted yesterday for Biden , McConnell finally congratulates him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ someone like McConnell to continue to resist congratulating Biden while Trump continues his fight .
Trump ’ s road to winning this in the courts was an uphill battle to begin with , and it ’ s even more so now .
We are now past the point at which Al Gore lost his fight in 2000 .
Only the hardest of hardcore Republicans would refuse at this point to call Biden ‘ president-elect ’ , and McConnell most certainly isn ’ t one of them .
While he has had a few @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presidency , he has plenty more squishy establishment moments that we ’ ve all seen .
I know the election challenges are still ongoing and like many of you , I do hope that Trump can find a way to beat a corrupt election that seems undeniable at this point .
I ’ m just not going to hold it against McConnell for congratulating Biden at this late point in the game .
UPDATE : Newsmax has just announced they are going to refer to Biden as ‘ president-elect ’ as well :

Mitch McConnell just congratulated Joe Biden as president-elect on the Senate floor:
.@senatemajldr: "So, as of this this morning, our country has officially a President-elect and a Vice President-elect… The Electoral College has spoken. So, today I want to congratulate President-elect Joe Biden." pic.twitter.com/4S7Xv7otsH — CSPAN (@cspan) December 15, 2020
I know this will make me unpopular, but I really don’t think it’s unreasonable for McConnell to congratulate Biden at this point. He’s waited for the past six weeks, refusing to do this when the media was demanding everyone bow to Biden and kiss his ring. And now, after Trump’s biggest election challenges have been rejected by the courts and electors around the country officially voted yesterday for Biden, McConnell finally congratulates him.
I just don’t expect someone like McConnell to continue to resist congratulating Biden while Trump continues his fight. Trump’s road to winning this in the courts was an uphill battle to begin with, and it’s even more so now. We are now past the point at which Al Gore lost his fight in 2000. Only the hardest of hardcore Republicans would refuse at this point to call Biden ‘president-elect’, and McConnell most certainly isn’t one of them. While he has had a few moments of greatness under Trump’s presidency, he has plenty more squishy establishment moments that we’ve all seen.
I know the election challenges are still ongoing and like many of you, I do hope that Trump can find a way to beat a corrupt election that seems undeniable at this point. I’m just not going to hold it against McConnell for congratulating Biden at this late point in the game.
UPDATE: Newsmax has just announced they are going to refer to Biden as ‘president-elect’ as well:
New statement from Newsmax: "As a result of the Electoral College vote Joe Biden is the president-elect and will be referred to as such on Newsmax. We also recognize Pres Trump continues to contest the results and we will cover aspects of that news story." https://t.co/ari9yNlL2c — Jeremy Barr (@jeremymbarr) December 15, 2020


therightscoop--2020-12-15--Top Facebook and Twitter execs donated tens of thousands to Joe Biden’s campaign

You better sit down for this .
It turns out that Facebook and Twitter executives donated entirely to Biden ’ s campaign for president : FOX NEWS – Top executives at Facebook and Twitter donated tens of thousands of dollars to President-elect Joe Biden ’ s campaign , Federal Election Commission records reviewed by Fox News reveal , as the social media platforms come under fire for limiting the circulation of reports surrounding Hunter Biden ’ s business dealings in the weeks leading up to Election Day .
A Fox News review of FEC records shows that top executives at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Biden campaign , including several who gave the legal maximum of $ 2,800 .
Fox News identified zero Facebook or Twitter executives who donated to Trump ’ s campaign .
Fox News explains who paid what based on their name and title : According to FEC records , Facebook vice president of public policy , Erin Egan , donated $ 2,800 to Biden ’ s campaign on Oct. 1 , in addition to the $ 2,800 she donated to the campaign during the Democratic primaries .
Facebook chief revenue officer David @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the primary , and an additional $ 750 during the general election , according to FEC records .
Facebook ’ s chief financial officer , David Wehner , donated the legal maximum of $ 2,800 to Biden ’ s campaign on April 22 , FEC records show .
Facebook vice presidents Gene Alston , Michael Verdu , Shahriar Rabii and T.S .
Khurana also donated the legal maximum of $ 2,800 to Biden ’ s campaign during the 2020 cycle , FEC records show .
Instagram ’ s chief operating officer , Marne @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of $ 2,800 to Biden ’ s campaign .
Over at Twitter , vice president Matt Derella donated $ 2,000 to Biden ’ s campaign in September .
And the executives were not alone .
FEC records revealed that dozens of Twitter and Facebook employees with “ manager ” or “ director ” in their titles donated at least $ 1,000 to Biden ’ s campaign .
Twitter ’ s senior director Ryan Oliver , for example , donated $ 2,800 to Biden ’ s campaign in March ; senior director of product @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Biden during the primary and another $ 2,800 to his general election campaign , FEC records show .
At Facebook , the platform ’ s public policy director Steve Satterfield , another public policy director , Michael Matthews , product manager Brett Keintz and Facebook director Ibrahim Okuyucu , donated $ 2,800 to Biden ’ s campaign .
Facebook program manager David Debartolo donated $ 5,600 – split between Biden ’ s primary campaign and general election campaign – on March 29 , FEC records show .
There were only two lone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lower amounts to Trump ’ s campaign , but none from Twitter : Just two Facebook employees with “ manager ” or “ director ” in their title donated to Trump ’ s campaign , neither of whom gave more than $ 300 , according to FEC records .
Zero Twitter employees with those titles donated to Trump ’ s campaign , FEC records show .
Twitter responded to the report by Fox News , defending their enforcement of Twitter rules : Oh yeah , so judiciously that they blocked the New York @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after they posted a story exposing how Crime family boss Joe Biden lied about being involved in Hunter ’ s dealings .
Even after they changed their policy on ‘ hacked materials ’ , they still continued to block the New York Post until they finally decided to lift their demand that the Post delete their tweet .

You better sit down for this. It turns out that Facebook and Twitter executives donated entirely to Biden’s campaign for president:
FOX NEWS – Top executives at Facebook and Twitter donated tens of thousands of dollars to President-elect Joe Biden’s campaign, Federal Election Commission records reviewed by Fox News reveal, as the social media platforms come under fire for limiting the circulation of reports surrounding Hunter Biden’s business dealings in the weeks leading up to Election Day. A Fox News review of FEC records shows that top executives at the social media companies made large donations to the Biden campaign, including several who gave the legal maximum of $2,800. Fox News identified zero Facebook or Twitter executives who donated to Trump’s campaign.
Fox News explains who paid what based on their name and title:
According to FEC records, Facebook vice president of public policy, Erin Egan, donated $2,800 to Biden’s campaign on Oct. 1, in addition to the $2,800 she donated to the campaign during the Democratic primaries. Facebook chief revenue officer David Fischer donated $2,800 to Biden during the primary, and an additional $750 during the general election, according to FEC records. Facebook’s chief financial officer, David Wehner, donated the legal maximum of $2,800 to Biden’s campaign on April 22, FEC records show. Facebook vice presidents Gene Alston, Michael Verdu, Shahriar Rabii and T.S. Khurana also donated the legal maximum of $2,800 to Biden’s campaign during the 2020 cycle, FEC records show. Instagram’s chief operating officer, Marne Levine, also donated the maximum limit of $2,800 to Biden’s campaign. Over at Twitter, vice president Matt Derella donated $2,000 to Biden’s campaign in September. And the executives were not alone. FEC records revealed that dozens of Twitter and Facebook employees with “manager” or “director” in their titles donated at least $1,000 to Biden’s campaign. Twitter’s senior director Ryan Oliver, for example, donated $2,800 to Biden’s campaign in March; senior director of product management James Kelm also donated $2,800 to Biden during the primary and another $2,800 to his general election campaign, FEC records show. At Facebook, the platform’s public policy director Steve Satterfield, another public policy director, Michael Matthews, product manager Brett Keintz and Facebook director Ibrahim Okuyucu, donated $2,800 to Biden’s campaign. Facebook program manager David Debartolo donated $5,600 – split between Biden’s primary campaign and general election campaign – on March 29, FEC records show.
There were only two lone Facebook managers who they found who donated lower amounts to Trump’s campaign, but none from Twitter:
Just two Facebook employees with “manager” or “director” in their title donated to Trump’s campaign, neither of whom gave more than $300, according to FEC records. Zero Twitter employees with those titles donated to Trump’s campaign, FEC records show.
Twitter responded to the report by Fox News, defending their enforcement of Twitter rules:
Twitter spokesman Trenton Kennedy told Fox News on Monday that the company has “stated many times – that we enforce the Twitter rules judiciously and impartially for everyone on our service.” “Political ideology – especially that of our employees – plays no part in this process,” Kennedy said. Facebook did not respond to Fox News’ request for comment.
Oh yeah, so judiciously that they blocked the New York Post’s Twitter account for WEEKS after they posted a story exposing how Crime family boss Joe Biden lied about being involved in Hunter’s dealings. Even after they changed their policy on ‘hacked materials’, they still continued to block the New York Post until they finally decided to lift their demand that the Post delete their tweet.


therightscoop--2020-12-15--WATCH: Frustrated restaurant owner loses it after California COVID enforcers close him down

A Ventura , California restaurant owner is being forced to close because he had voluntary outdoor dining on Friday night in protest , and refused to shut his restaurant down when ‘ health inspectors ’ came by Friday night and told him to do so .
More COVID enforcers came by yesterday to issue him a closure order and he lost it with them : In this clip Anton explains the backstory , saying that he only had his tables and chairs outside for a protest Friday Night and served all of his food to go .
If anyone sat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was their prerogative to do so , not his instruction .
He said he was told by the health department that he could leave his chairs and tables out as a protest , however that night two officials came and issued him a closure order .
Anton brought his tables and chairs back inside , but remained open .
The videos above is when they came yesterday to threaten to revoke his health permit if he continued to defy the closure order .
Anton makes the point that next door to him a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clothing racks outside for people to shop at , but he ’ s not allowed to have outdoor dining .
He says it makes no sense that they think COVID won ’ t get passed while they are shopping for clothes , but it will get passed with people eating outdoors .
Anton says it feels like nothing more than a power trip at this point .

A Ventura, California restaurant owner is being forced to close because he had voluntary outdoor dining on Friday night in protest, and refused to shut his restaurant down when ‘health inspectors’ came by Friday night and told him to do so. More COVID enforcers came by yesterday to issue him a closure order and he lost it with them:
During my interview with owner Anton Van Happen of 'Nick The Greek' in Ventura, public health inspectors stopped by to issue Van Happen a cituation from remaining open after receving a closure order on Friday."I have copied with everything" says Anton pic.twitter.com/T39io6eC79 — Jorge Ventura Media (@VenturaReport) December 15, 2020
"They're going to issue me a cituation now" says Anton Van Happen owner of 'Nick The Greek', into the camera as public health inspectors are at his restaurant to take photos and give Anton his cituation for remaining open after receving a closure order for having outdoor seating pic.twitter.com/uQENKFhxfh — Jorge Ventura Media (@VenturaReport) December 15, 2020
"I'm not breaking the law!" says owner Anton Van Happen of 'Nick The Greek' to public health inspectors issuing him a citation for staying open after being issued a closure order. Inspectors warn Anton of his health permit being revoked if he remains open pic.twitter.com/C2VD1CGm4k — Jorge Ventura Media (@VenturaReport) December 15, 2020
"Are you going to pay my rent ? says owner Anton Van Happen of 'Nick The Greek' to public health inspectors issuing him a citation for staying open after being issued a closure order. Things got tense pic.twitter.com/9eKCiAjDaw — Jorge Ventura Media (@VenturaReport) December 15, 2020
In this clip Anton explains the backstory, saying that he only had his tables and chairs outside for a protest Friday Night and served all of his food to go. If anyone sat in the tables and chairs, it was their prerogative to do so, not his instruction. He said he was told by the health department that he could leave his chairs and tables out as a protest, however that night two officials came and issued him a closure order. Anton brought his tables and chairs back inside, but remained open. The videos above is when they came yesterday to threaten to revoke his health permit if he continued to defy the closure order.
Public Health has warned Anton Van Happen, owner of 'Nick The Greek' in Ventura for serving food,defying a 'Covid-19 Closure Order' of a the possibility of having his public health permit revoked,barring him from opening his restaurant for business. Closure was issued on Friday pic.twitter.com/JgzxbXR8wG — Jorge Ventura Media (@VenturaReport) December 15, 2020
Anton makes the point that next door to him a clothing store is allowed to put their clothing racks outside for people to shop at, but he’s not allowed to have outdoor dining. He says it makes no sense that they think COVID won’t get passed while they are shopping for clothes, but it will get passed with people eating outdoors. Anton says it feels like nothing more than a power trip at this point.


therightscoop--2020-12-17--BRUTAL: Tucker Carlson exposes Dr. Jill Biden’s dissertation and it’s REALLY BAD

As you may have heard Dr. Jill Biden isn ’ t really a doctor in real life , despite what Whoopi Goldberg might say about her becoming Surgeon General .
Dr. Jill is actually more like the doctors you see on TV , who are only pretend doctors .
Well tonight Tucker Carlson decided to read parts of Dr. Jill ’ s dissertation that she did to get her PhD in education , and as he puts it , it ’ s embarrassing : Tucker begins by showing a portion of the dissertation that highlight Dr. Jill ’ s inability @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Jill managed to find five quarters of the class instead of four .
But he ’ s not done .
Here ’ s another portion I ’ ve transcribed that Tucker highlighted to show her math skills : As Tucker points out , 159 students were surveyed but apparently Dr. Jill found 162 results .
But he ’ s still not done : An eight week study week ?
Wow , that ’ s a new one .
Lastly , Tucker highlighted one of the better parts of her dissertation , noting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : If you haven ’ t figure it out yet , the point here isn ’ t to just mock Joe Biden ’ s wife .
That would be cruel .
Rather , it ’ s to point out that while she likes to be called Dr. Jill , the ‘ Dr ’ part seems like more of a status symbol than it is anything else .
This is her dissertation after all , the document responsible for landing her that doctorate in education .
It ’ s riddled with typos , errors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go just by what we see above .
Just how much did she pay for that doctorate at the University of Delaware ?
If you want to read Dr. Jill ’ s dissertation , you can find it here .

As you may have heard Dr. Jill Biden isn’t really a doctor in real life, despite what Whoopi Goldberg might say about her becoming Surgeon General. Dr. Jill is actually more like the doctors you see on TV, who are only pretend doctors.
Well tonight Tucker Carlson decided to read parts of Dr. Jill’s dissertation that she did to get her PhD in education, and as he puts it, it’s embarrassing:
That's DOCTOR Jill Biden To You! pic.twitter.com/szFTBZxI3o — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) December 17, 2020
Tucker begins by showing a portion of the dissertation that highlight Dr. Jill’s inability to do math:
Tucker notes that Dr. Jill managed to find five quarters of the class instead of four.
But he’s not done. Here’s another portion I’ve transcribed that Tucker highlighted to show her math skills:
“Of the 159 students surveyed, 55 receive financial aid, 41 pay their own tuition bills; 45 student’s parents pay, 3 spouses pay; 9 receive scholarships; and 9 others receive funds through the GI Bill, vocational rehabilitation programs, or grant.”
As Tucker points out, 159 students were surveyed but apparently Dr. Jill found 162 results. But he’s still not done:
An eight week study week? Wow, that’s a new one.
Lastly, Tucker highlighted one of the better parts of her dissertation, noting that it wasn’t all bad:
Wow. A retention department that’s made a concerted effort to address retention. That’s profound.
If you haven’t figure it out yet, the point here isn’t to just mock Joe Biden’s wife. That would be cruel. Rather, it’s to point out that while she likes to be called Dr. Jill, the ‘Dr’ part seems like more of a status symbol than it is anything else. This is her dissertation after all, the document responsible for landing her that doctorate in education. It’s riddled with typos, errors, and very simplistic conclusions if we go just by what we see above. Just how much did she pay for that doctorate at the University of Delaware?
If you want to read Dr. Jill’s dissertation, you can find it here.


therightscoop--2020-12-17--Obama judge DENIES lawsuit to reinstate 200k purged Georgia voters before run-off

Last week we told you about a lawsuit to reinstate over 200k Georgia voters before the January 5th run-off , which had been purged from the voter rolls in 2019 .
And that the judge , and Obama pick , would decide on the case soon .
Well now we have his decision : 11ALIVE – A federal judge on Wednesday denied a lawsuit seeking to restore 200,000 people to Georgia ’ s voter rolls ahead of the Jan. 5 Senate runoffs , though he acknowledged “ there may be discrepancies ” in the records relied on to cancel those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had been brought by a coalition of groups that advocate on behalf of voters of color , including Black Voters Matter Fund and the Rainbow Push Coalition .
The groups argued the 200,000 voters removed from the rolls a year ago had their registrations canceled because they had allegedly moved out of state , though , the suit said , “ according to experts in the field , in all likelihood they had not.
” The suit claimed the action was a violation of the National Voter Registration Act .
State officials have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ … to do list maintenance.
” Not only did the judge deny their request , but did it because they lacked standing .
He also didn ’ t believe the state of Georgia acted discriminatorily : Judge Jones first found that the groups lack standing , ruling they had failed to satisfy a pre-suit notice requirement in the National Voter Registration Act .
Addressing the groups ’ claim that the removal of the voters violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment , Judge Jones wrote that while they ’ d shown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the records used to cancel registrations , that the canceling process itself was not done discriminatorily .
“ Plaintiffs have shown that Georgia ’ s list maintenance process may not be accurate in identifying voters who have actually moved .
But they have not shown , or even alleged , that the process is applied differently to any class of voters , ” Judge Jones wrote .
“ Here , there is no evidence at this stage that the list maintenance process is not uniformly applied.
” The judge also ruled , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the voters to the rolls would impose an undue burden on the Secretary of State ’ s Office as it currently administers an election – as well as create confusion around the Jan 5 .
Senate runoffs .
Well , I couldn ’ t have been more wrong in my assumption that this judge would end up reinstating all of these voters .
I said I ’ d be shocked if he dismissed the case , and while he didn ’ t dismiss it outright , he did rule against the Democrat groups @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I ’ m shocked .
So here ’ s a bit of good news going into the January 5th run-off .

Last week we told you about a lawsuit to reinstate over 200k Georgia voters before the January 5th run-off, which had been purged from the voter rolls in 2019. And that the judge, and Obama pick, would decide on the case soon. Well now we have his decision:
11ALIVE – A federal judge on Wednesday denied a lawsuit seeking to restore 200,000 people to Georgia’s voter rolls ahead of the Jan. 5 Senate runoffs, though he acknowledged “there may be discrepancies” in the records relied on to cancel those registrations in December 2019. The suit had been brought by a coalition of groups that advocate on behalf of voters of color, including Black Voters Matter Fund and the Rainbow Push Coalition. The groups argued the 200,000 voters removed from the rolls a year ago had their registrations canceled because they had allegedly moved out of state, though, the suit said, “according to experts in the field, in all likelihood they had not.” The suit claimed the action was a violation of the National Voter Registration Act. State officials have said they “properly followed the law … to do list maintenance.”
Not only did the judge deny their request, but did it because they lacked standing. He also didn’t believe the state of Georgia acted discriminatorily:
Judge Jones first found that the groups lack standing, ruling they had failed to satisfy a pre-suit notice requirement in the National Voter Registration Act. Addressing the groups’ claim that the removal of the voters violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, Judge Jones wrote that while they’d shown there were issues with the accuracy of the records used to cancel registrations, that the canceling process itself was not done discriminatorily. “Plaintiffs have shown that Georgia’s list maintenance process may not be accurate in identifying voters who have actually moved. But they have not shown, or even alleged, that the process is applied differently to any class of voters,” Judge Jones wrote. “Here, there is no evidence at this stage that the list maintenance process is not uniformly applied.” The judge also ruled, in part, that the process of returning the voters to the rolls would impose an undue burden on the Secretary of State’s Office as it currently administers an election – as well as create confusion around the Jan 5. Senate runoffs.
Well, I couldn’t have been more wrong in my assumption that this judge would end up reinstating all of these voters. I said I’d be shocked if he dismissed the case, and while he didn’t dismiss it outright, he did rule against the Democrat groups pushing for this, and yes, I’m shocked. So here’s a bit of good news going into the January 5th run-off.


therightscoop--2020-12-17--New email shows Hunter Biden asking Chinese partner for 10 million in 2017

A new email from Tony Bobulinski reveals how Hunter Biden sent best wishes to his Chinese business partner , before asking him for 10 million so he could get their startup company off the ground : NY POST – Hunter Biden lobbied since-vanished Chinese oil tycoon Ye Jianming to “ quickly ” wire him $ 10 million to help establish and fund his failed business venture SinoHawk Holdings in 2017 , according to an email obtained by The Post .
In the June 18 email , President-elect Joe Biden ’ s scandal-scarred son sent “ best wishes from the entire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for their joint venture .
The trove of documents were among more than 900 made public by Hunter Biden ’ s former business partner Tony Bobulinski , who stepped forward in October with bombshell allegations that Joe Biden was intimately involved in his son ’ s plans to cash in overseas .
In the 2017 email , Biden introduced Ye to Bobulinski , who he said would be acting as CEO of SinoHawk Holdings and was bullish about his ability to invest Ye ’ s billions in infrastructure projects in countries like Oman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : I hope my letter finds you well .
I regret missing you on your last visit to the United States Please accept the best wishes from the entire Biden family as well as my partners , ” the letter began .
“ As you know since our last meeting we have concluded the establishment of SinoHawk Holdings and I look forward to introducing you to Mr. Tony Bobulinski , ” he wrote .
“ He is a very close friend of James Gilliar and the Biden family and joined our team to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a partner.
” “ He will act as the CEO of SinoHawk Holdings .
He has invested capital all over the world for some of the world ’ s wealthiest families , ” he went on , before asking Ye to send a “ $ 10 MM USD wire.
” “ I would appreciate if you will send that quickly so we can properly fund and operate Sinohawk .
I hope that you are satisfied with the introductions made in Oman and the progress made , ” he went on .
The money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the Chinese government : But Ye ’ s company , CEFC China Energy Company Limited , never sent the funds and SinoHawk apparently was dissolved around October 2018 , according to documents released by Bobulinski .
Ye disappeared after being taken into custody by Chinese authorities in early 2018 , and CEFC , which was China ’ s largest private energy company , went bankrupt this year , according to reports .
Their venture targeted “ key domestic contacts ” including New York Gov .
Andrew Cuomo for potential projects across the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a limited liability company that involved Hunter Biden , Bobulinski , Joe Biden ’ s brother Jim Biden and several other men .
All of this proof that the former Vice President Biden ’ s crime family was doing business with China , yet the media could care less .
Tucker talked about this in a larger segment about how Biden is about to appoint a Chinese propagandist as ambassador to China :

A new email from Tony Bobulinski reveals how Hunter Biden sent best wishes to his Chinese business partner, before asking him for 10 million so he could get their startup company off the ground:
NY POST – Hunter Biden lobbied since-vanished Chinese oil tycoon Ye Jianming to “quickly” wire him $10 million to help establish and fund his failed business venture SinoHawk Holdings in 2017, according to an email obtained by The Post. In the June 18 email, President-elect Joe Biden’s scandal-scarred son sent “best wishes from the entire Biden family” before outlining his expectations for their joint venture. The trove of documents were among more than 900 made public by Hunter Biden’s former business partner Tony Bobulinski, who stepped forward in October with bombshell allegations that Joe Biden was intimately involved in his son’s plans to cash in overseas. In the 2017 email, Biden introduced Ye to Bobulinski, who he said would be acting as CEO of SinoHawk Holdings and was bullish about his ability to invest Ye’s billions in infrastructure projects in countries like Oman and Romania.
The email…
“Dear Chairman Ye: I hope my letter finds you well. I regret missing you on your last visit to the United States Please accept the best wishes from the entire Biden family as well as my partners,” the letter began. “As you know since our last meeting we have concluded the establishment of SinoHawk Holdings and I look forward to introducing you to Mr. Tony Bobulinski,” he wrote. “He is a very close friend of James Gilliar and the Biden family and joined our team to focus on the execution of things as a partner.” “He will act as the CEO of SinoHawk Holdings. He has invested capital all over the world for some of the world’s wealthiest families,” he went on, before asking Ye to send a “$10 MM USD wire.” “I would appreciate if you will send that quickly so we can properly fund and operate Sinohawk. I hope that you are satisfied with the introductions made in Oman and the progress made,” he went on.
The money was never sent and Ye was disappeared by the Chinese government:
But Ye’s company, CEFC China Energy Company Limited, never sent the funds and SinoHawk apparently was dissolved around October 2018, according to documents released by Bobulinski. Ye disappeared after being taken into custody by Chinese authorities in early 2018, and CEFC, which was China’s largest private energy company, went bankrupt this year, according to reports. Their venture targeted “key domestic contacts” including New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo for potential projects across the country, documents revealed. SinoHawk was a limited liability company that involved Hunter Biden, Bobulinski, Joe Biden’s brother Jim Biden and several other men.
All of this proof that the former Vice President Biden’s crime family was doing business with China, yet the media could care less.
Tucker talked about this in a larger segment about how Biden is about to appoint a Chinese propagandist as ambassador to China:
Tucker Carlson highlights a hire that Joe Biden could make… who has disturbingly strong ties to China. pic.twitter.com/lDawewsBbL — (((Jason Rantz))) on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz) December 17, 2020


therightscoop--2020-12-16--WATCH: Josh Hawley scorches Dems for telling Republicans to shut up about election fraud issues

Josh Hawley scorched Democrats in today ’ s hearing for lecturing Republicans who have concerns about the integrity of our elections , suggesting they shut up and accept Biden as president : The actual scorching only goes on for the first few minutes of the video , but Hawley ’ s point is that Democrats went on and on for the last four years about how Trump was only elected because he colluded with Russia , which we all know was nothing but a hoax .
Hawley said he was just yesterday talking to normal , everyday Missourians who all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and that their votes were disenfranchised by the fraud that took place in other states .
He says they are not going to shut up about election fraud and they shouldn ’ t : After four years of that , being told that the last election was fake and that Donald Trump wasn ’ t really elected and that Russia intervened – after four years that , now these same people are told ‘ You just sit down and shut up ; if you have any concerns about election integrity you ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ Well I tell you what .
74 million Americans are not going to shut up and telling them that their views don ’ t matter and that their concerns don ’ t matter , that they should just be quiet , is not a recipe for success in this country .
It ’ s not a recipe for the unity that I hear now the other side is suddenly so interested in after years and years of trying to delegitimize President Donald Trump .
So suffice it to say that I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how Missourians and others who voted for President Trump , and now have some concerns about fraud , about integrity , about compliance with the law , should just be quiet and that they are somehow not patriotic if they raise these questions .
It ’ s absolutely unbelievable .
Hawley nailed it .
I don ’ t need to add anything to that , except to say Republicans in the Senate and the House should not rest until every bit of the election fraud that we ’ ve all just witnessed is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stop this madness from happening again .

Josh Hawley scorched Democrats in today’s hearing for lecturing Republicans who have concerns about the integrity of our elections, suggesting they shut up and accept Biden as president:
The actual scorching only goes on for the first few minutes of the video, but Hawley’s point is that Democrats went on and on for the last four years about how Trump was only elected because he colluded with Russia, which we all know was nothing but a hoax.
Hawley said he was just yesterday talking to normal, everyday Missourians who all felt like the election had been rigged and that their votes were disenfranchised by the fraud that took place in other states. He says they are not going to shut up about election fraud and they shouldn’t:
After four years of that, being told that the last election was fake and that Donald Trump wasn’t really elected and that Russia intervened – after four years that, now these same people are told ‘You just sit down and shut up; if you have any concerns about election integrity you’re a nutcase and you should shut up.’ Well I tell you what. 74 million Americans are not going to shut up and telling them that their views don’t matter and that their concerns don’t matter, that they should just be quiet, is not a recipe for success in this country. It’s not a recipe for the unity that I hear now the other side is suddenly so interested in after years and years of trying to delegitimize President Donald Trump. So suffice it to say that I’m not too keen on lectures about how Missourians and others who voted for President Trump, and now have some concerns about fraud, about integrity, about compliance with the law, should just be quiet and that they are somehow not patriotic if they raise these questions. It’s absolutely unbelievable.
Hawley nailed it. I don’t need to add anything to that, except to say Republicans in the Senate and the House should not rest until every bit of the election fraud that we’ve all just witnessed is exposed, so that state legislatures can stop this madness from happening again.


therightscoop--2020-12-16--OANN president says network won’t recognize Biden as president-elect until Congress says so…

The president of OANN said today that his network will not recognize Biden as president-elect until Congress makes it so @ @ @ @ @ will not recognize Biden as the President-elect as all of our investigations indicate there was @ @ @ @ @ will be no decision until Jan. 6 , 2021.
” OANN clearly knows their viewer @ @ @ @ @ in stark contrast to Newsmax , who has already accepted Biden as president-elect .
However @ @ @ @ @ too early for some , as the only date Team Trump is talking about is @ @ @ @ @ .
They plan to challenge the election until then .

The president of OANN said today that his network will not recognize Biden as president-elect until Congress makes it so:
“One America News will not recognize Biden as the President-elect as all of our investigations indicate there was fraud in voting. There will be no decision until Jan. 6, 2021.”
One America News will not recognize Biden as the President-elect as all of our investigations indicate there was fraud in voting. There will be no decision until Jan. 6, 2021. @OANN — Robert Herring (@RobHerring) December 16, 2020
OANN clearly knows their viewer base and their decision stands in stark contrast to Newsmax, who has already accepted Biden as president-elect.
However January 6th may still be too early for some, as the only date Team Trump is talking about is January 20th, the inauguration. They plan to challenge the election until then.


therightscoop--2020-12-16--WOOPS: Joe Biden calls Buttigieg’s husband by a female name

Upon announcing that he ’ s selected Pete Buttigieg as his transportation secretary , Biden totally botched the name of his husband ( ew ) by using a female name instead : NY POST – President-elect Joe Biden on Wednesday mangled his rollout of Pete Buttigieg as the “ first ” gay Cabinet nominee — using a female name for Buttigieg ’ s husband and omitting mention of President Trump having named the first gay Cabinet-level member .
Biden noted his fondness for Buttigieg ’ s husband “ Kirsten ” during a speech in Wilmington , Del.
, as he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Indiana , mayor as his nominee for transportation secretary .
“ And by the way , Jill and I have always enjoyed seeing Pete and Kirsten — Chasten I should say — together on the trail .
Chasten has become a close friend of Jill ’ s and mine.
” Ugh .
I hate reporting on stories that include ‘ his husband ’ because it seriously grosses me out .
But I felt it necessary to post this regardless of the ewww factor .
Biden also claimed that Buttigieg would be the fist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ position .
While that ’ s technically true , Ric Grenell was the first openly gay man to be selected for a Cabinet position , who was selected by Trump : Biden also snubbed Ric Grenell , who Trump celebrated this year as the first gay Cabinet member when he worked three months as acting Director of National Intelligence .
Buttigieg would be the “ first ever openly gay nominee to lead a Cabinet department , ” Biden said .
Grenell was not confirmed by the Senate to his Cabinet-level job overseeing spy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republicans accuse Biden of parsing details to dubiously claim the first gay Cabinet pick in a snub of Grenell and Republicans .
Grenell was never a nominee and thus not confirmed .
But liberals can ’ t be expected to celebrate Trump for living up to their own standards , right ?
They are so filled with hate for Trump that won ’ t even acknowledge that he did it first .

Upon announcing that he’s selected Pete Buttigieg as his transportation secretary, Biden totally botched the name of his husband (ew) by using a female name instead:
NY POST – President-elect Joe Biden on Wednesday mangled his rollout of Pete Buttigieg as the “first” gay Cabinet nominee — using a female name for Buttigieg’s husband and omitting mention of President Trump having named the first gay Cabinet-level member. Biden noted his fondness for Buttigieg’s husband “Kirsten” during a speech in Wilmington, Del., as he formally named the former South Bend, Indiana, mayor as his nominee for transportation secretary.
“And by the way, Jill and I have always enjoyed seeing Pete and Kirsten — Chasten I should say — together on the trail. Chasten has become a close friend of Jill’s and mine.”
Ugh. I hate reporting on stories that include ‘his husband’ because it seriously grosses me out. But I felt it necessary to post this regardless of the ewww factor.
Biden also claimed that Buttigieg would be the fist gay ‘nominee’ for a Cabinet position. While that’s technically true, Ric Grenell was the first openly gay man to be selected for a Cabinet position, who was selected by Trump:
Biden also snubbed Ric Grenell, who Trump celebrated this year as the first gay Cabinet member when he worked three months as acting Director of National Intelligence. Buttigieg would be the “first ever openly gay nominee to lead a Cabinet department,” Biden said. Grenell was not confirmed by the Senate to his Cabinet-level job overseeing spy agencies, but on social media, Republicans accuse Biden of parsing details to dubiously claim the first gay Cabinet pick in a snub of Grenell and Republicans.
Grenell was never a nominee and thus not confirmed. But liberals can’t be expected to celebrate Trump for living up to their own standards, right? They are so filled with hate for Trump that won’t even acknowledge that he did it first.


therightscoop--2020-12-16--WATCH: Julian Assange actually called to warn the Obama State Dept of a theft of classified cables

Project Veritas got their hands on audio of Julian Assange calling to warn the Obama state department of a leak @ @ @ @ @ felt were going to be released imminently by someone who used to work for him @ @ @ @ @ state department do was to research and find the locations of the encrypted materials online @ @ @ @ @ .
He thought by doing that they could slow or prevent the release of the @ @ @ @ @ knew a few of the locations but didn ’ t want to divulge it , @ @ @ @ @ was more his problem to find them .
For someone who seemed dedicated to the @ @ @ @ @ materials , I find it somewhat surprising that he would spend a day on the @ @ @ @ @ state department of an impending release of such materials .

Project Veritas got their hands on audio of Julian Assange calling to warn the Obama state department of a leak of classified cables that he felt were going to be released imminently by someone who used to work for him:
LISTEN: @Wikileaks founder Julian Assange thought the U.S Government might have been able to block or slow the publication of the unredacted documents by covertly deleting some of the files: pic.twitter.com/hx5u2fSzuC — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) December 16, 2020
What Assange suggested the state department do was to research and find the locations of the encrypted materials online and to covertly delete them. He thought by doing that they could slow or prevent the release of the cables.
Assange said he knew a few of the locations but didn’t want to divulge it, telling the official that it was more his problem to find them.
For someone who seemed dedicated to the spreading of leaked and confidential materials, I find it somewhat surprising that he would spend a day on the phone trying to warn the state department of an impending release of such materials.
Watch the video for more…


therightscoop--2020-12-16--Facebook penalized us for article on Dominion Systems forensic report, when all we did was QUOTE THE

Facebook penalized us for article on Dominion Systems forensic report, when all we did was QUOTE THE REPORT

Facebook is completely out of control .
They penalized The Right Scoop for our article on the Antrim County forensic report on Dominion Voting Systems , when all we did was quote the report : They claim our article is missing context , but how exactly ?
I only quoted excerpts from the report and posted two screenshots of the report , along with the full report itself .
I never presented any opinion about it whatsoever .
Even the title was simply a quote from the report : Forensic report on Dominion Voting Systems says “ Antrim County should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply presenting the report , they added another page violation and diminished the article ’ s reach .
There ’ s no missing context whatsoever .
What the so-called fact-checker wanted me to do was editorialize away the report , saying needless things like the report didn ’ t ‘ prove ’ that the Dominion software did anything wrong or that the report was written by someone who was a ‘ Trump partisan ’ .
But to me that ’ s unnecessary for the type of article I did .
Either the report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t .
Either it ’ s factual or it isn ’ t .
I shouldn ’ t be penalized for simply presenting a forensic report that many on our side were touting at the time .
If someone disagrees with the report , they can write an article explaining why , like Lead Stories did for their so-called fact-check .
I have no issue with someone criticizing it or supporting it .
It ’ s their opinion and they are more than entitled to express it .
But that wasn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was simply to present the report , along with its conclusions , to our readers so they could dive deeper into the report and its analysis .
My intent , as the author , wasn ’ t to fact-check the report and , to be honest , I ’ m not really qualified for such an endeavor on something like this .
What Facebook is penalizing The Right Scoop ( and presumably other outlets ) for is not dismissing the report out of hand , for not expressing an opinion they approve of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no widespread voter fraud that made Joe Biden president .
This about their campaign to silence those of us on the right who they believe helped elect Donald Trump four years ago .

Facebook is completely out of control. They penalized The Right Scoop for our article on the Antrim County forensic report on Dominion Voting Systems, when all we did was quote the report:
They claim our article is missing context, but how exactly? I only quoted excerpts from the report and posted two screenshots of the report, along with the full report itself. I never presented any opinion about it whatsoever.
Even the title was simply a quote from the report: Forensic report on Dominion Voting Systems says “Antrim County should not have been certified.”
But for simply presenting the report, they added another page violation and diminished the article’s reach.
There’s no missing context whatsoever. What the so-called fact-checker wanted me to do was editorialize away the report, saying needless things like the report didn’t ‘prove’ that the Dominion software did anything wrong or that the report was written by someone who was a ‘Trump partisan’.
But to me that’s unnecessary for the type of article I did. Either the report stands on its own or it doesn’t. Either it’s factual or it isn’t. I shouldn’t be penalized for simply presenting a forensic report that many on our side were touting at the time.
If someone disagrees with the report, they can write an article explaining why, like Lead Stories did for their so-called fact-check. I have no issue with someone criticizing it or supporting it. It’s their opinion and they are more than entitled to express it.
But that wasn’t the aim of our article, which was simply to present the report, along with its conclusions, to our readers so they could dive deeper into the report and its analysis. My intent, as the author, wasn’t to fact-check the report and, to be honest, I’m not really qualified for such an endeavor on something like this.
What Facebook is penalizing The Right Scoop (and presumably other outlets) for is not dismissing the report out of hand, for not expressing an opinion they approve of in their quest to pretend there was no widespread voter fraud that made Joe Biden president. This about their campaign to silence those of us on the right who they believe helped elect Donald Trump four years ago.


therightscoop--2020-12-16--Mark Levin blasts the Supreme Court for being ‘highly political’ and ‘liberal’ after failure during

Mark Levin blasts the Supreme Court for being ‘highly political’ and ‘liberal’ after failure during election challenges

The Great One hammered the Supreme Court this morning over failing to do its job during this year ’ s election challenges , saying it ’ s become too liberal and highly political : This election has exposed the complete collapse of the judiciary as a check on unconstitutional acts by state officials eviscerating legislative authority under our federal constitution ( Art .
II , Sec .
1 , Cl .
2 ) .
It has also exposed the Supreme Court as a highly political , result-oriented , LIBERAL body that grants standing when it wants to rule on a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ denies standing when it wants to duck a case ( Texas v. PA , et al ) .
That Court intervenes relentlessly in state election processes , almost exclusively in support of leftwing activists and Democrat organizations that seek to weaken election security and fraud prevent .
The Court and inferior federal and state courts have earned the contempt of tens of millions of Americans .
While the media , Democrats , NeverTrumpers , and others , have celebrated the denial of substantive court proceedings to scores of petitioners raising fundamental federal and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serious questions of fraud in states including , but not limited to Wisconsin and Georgia , these courts have disgraced themselves and severely damaged the electoral process .
In effect , they have served as the Praetorian Guard for the planned , elaborate , and unlawful acts of the Democrat Party , its lawyers , and their state public officeholders throughout battleground states .
Despite the media claiming that 6 of the justices are conservative , and Chuck Schumer ’ s propaganda about his desire to pack the Court because it is supposedly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opposite .
When the Court actually upholds the Constitution it is , more often than not , the EXCEPTION to the rule , which for the Court is activism with few limits .
I ’ m sure some will dismiss this as simply butthurt on the right , but this really isn ’ t about Trump winning or losing .
It ’ s about election fraud being perpetrated by radicals at both the state and local level in order to get the change they wanted , and the court system looking the other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have free , fair , and virtuous elections , we don ’ t have the republic that our founders created and Americans everywhere will lose confidence in one of our most important institutions .
This is quickest path to socialism !
Because good Americans in all corners of the country , who believe in liberty and the ideals of our founding , will simply stop voting , leaving our country in the hands of radicals and their useful idiots which are a plenty .
This is why it ’ s so crucial for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and to restore confidence in our elections .
We simply can not trust our judicial system and the highest court in the land to do the right thing when the states fail us .
The Supreme Court , under John Roberts , seems to care more about protecting itself than it does our elections and that ’ s a very dangerous place to be .

The Great One hammered the Supreme Court this morning over failing to do its job during this year’s election challenges, saying it’s become too liberal and highly political:
This election has exposed the complete collapse of the judiciary as a check on unconstitutional acts by state officials eviscerating legislative authority under our federal constitution (Art. II, Sec. 1, Cl. 2). It has also exposed the Supreme Court as a highly political, result-oriented, LIBERAL body that grants standing when it wants to rule on a case (Mass v. EPA) and denies standing when it wants to duck a case (Texas v. PA, et al). That Court intervenes relentlessly in state election processes, almost exclusively in support of leftwing activists and Democrat organizations that seek to weaken election security and fraud prevent. The Court and inferior federal and state courts have earned the contempt of tens of millions of Americans. While the media, Democrats, NeverTrumpers, and others, have celebrated the denial of substantive court proceedings to scores of petitioners raising fundamental federal and state constitutional issues, not to mention serious questions of fraud in states including, but not limited to Wisconsin and Georgia, these courts have disgraced themselves and severely damaged the electoral process. In effect, they have served as the Praetorian Guard for the planned, elaborate, and unlawful acts of the Democrat Party, its lawyers, and their state public officeholders throughout battleground states. Despite the media claiming that 6 of the justices are conservative, and Chuck Schumer’s propaganda about his desire to pack the Court because it is supposedly too conservative, the FACT is the opposite. When the Court actually upholds the Constitution it is, more often than not, the EXCEPTION to the rule, which for the Court is activism with few limits.
I’m sure some will dismiss this as simply butthurt on the right, but this really isn’t about Trump winning or losing. It’s about election fraud being perpetrated by radicals at both the state and local level in order to get the change they wanted, and the court system looking the other way.
It we don’t have free, fair, and virtuous elections, we don’t have the republic that our founders created and Americans everywhere will lose confidence in one of our most important institutions. This is quickest path to socialism! Because good Americans in all corners of the country, who believe in liberty and the ideals of our founding, will simply stop voting, leaving our country in the hands of radicals and their useful idiots which are a plenty.
This is why it’s so crucial for state legislators to fix our election laws and to restore confidence in our elections. We simply cannot trust our judicial system and the highest court in the land to do the right thing when the states fail us. The Supreme Court, under John Roberts, seems to care more about protecting itself than it does our elections and that’s a very dangerous place to be.


therightscoop--2020-12-16--[STARTING SOON] –> WATCH LIVE: Amistad project holds presser to unveil groundbreaking report exposin

[STARTING SOON] –> WATCH LIVE: Amistad project holds presser to unveil groundbreaking report exposing a dark money apparatus to fundamentally undermine the electoral system

Phillip Kline tweeted yesterday “ We ’ re hosting a national press conference tomorrow to release a groundbreaking report exposing @ @ @ @ @ 10 nonprofit organizations funded by five foundations whose intent was to fundamentally undermine the electoral @ @ @ @ @ at noon and you can watch the full press conference below : I didn ’ @ @ @ @ @ holding a hearing this morning on election ‘ irregularities ’ .
It began at 10AM @ @ @ @ @ :

Phillip Kline tweeted yesterday “We’re hosting a national press conference tomorrow to release a groundbreaking report exposing a dark money apparatus of 10 nonprofit organizations funded by five foundations whose intent was to fundamentally undermine the electoral system.”
We’re hosting a national press conference tomorrow to release a groundbreaking report exposing a dark money apparatus of 10 nonprofit organizations funded by five foundations whose intent was to fundamentally undermine the electoral system. Details below: pic.twitter.com/HLgtrciavu — Phillip Kline (@PhillDKline) December 16, 2020
The presser begins at noon and you can watch the full press conference below:
NTD:
RSB:
WHILE YOU WAIT:
I didn’t realize the Senate was holding a hearing this morning on election ‘irregularities’. It began at 10AM and is already in progress:


therightscoop--2020-12-18--Tommy Tuberville considering joining House Republicans in objecting to electoral votes in Janurary

It looks like Tommy Tuberville could be the one Senator who , on January 6th , joins House Republicans in objecting to electoral votes from certain states on January 6th : YELLOW HAMMER NEWS – In a phone interview with Yellowhammer News on Thursday , U.S. Senator-elect Tommy Tuberville ( R-AL ) spoke about his thoughts on the planned effort by some U.S. House Republicans to challenge the Electoral College votes of certain states on January 6 .
The effort is being led by Congressman Mo Brooks ( AL-05 ) , however the formal support of at least one senator @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and votes by each chamber on the respective states in question .
The electors of each state voted on Monday , and the results would put Joe Biden into office on January 20 if they are accepted by Congress .
Tuberville this week has been back on the campaign trail , this time traveling across Georgia supporting U.S .
Senators Kelly Loeffler ( R-GA ) and David Perdue ( R-GA ) as part of the “ Save America ” bus tour .
Tuberville says he ’ s going to do his ‘ due @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Speaking to Yellowhammer News , Tuberville emphasized that he has not made up his mind on whether he will support the congressional challenge ; he outlined that he will be doing his “ due diligence , ” studying the issue and soliciting feedback from his constituents before taking a stance .
This aligns with his pledge while running for election and then during his November 3 victory speech that he will represent the wishes of the majority of his constituents as a senator .
“ I want to do what ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Alabama and the people of this country , ” Tuberville said on Thursday .
“ They asked me , ‘ Are you going to support President Trump ?
’ And , of course , I ’ m always going to support President Trump .
He ’ s the best president of my lifetime and has done more for the people of this country and the state of Alabama than anybody .
But we want to make sure we do the right thing.
” He explained that he has been getting a large @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as well as in-person feedback while campaigning in Georgia , about Brooks ’ effort the past few days .
The former Auburn University head football coach said the large majority of what he is hearing is people concerned about alleged voter fraud during the 2020 presidential election .
“ Now that I ’ m off the road I ’ m going to start doing my due diligence , ” Tuberville advised .
“ It ’ s not like you have to make your mind up in the next 24 hours .
I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get his side of it.
” He expects his “ due diligence ” to be conducted “ through Christmas.
” Tuberville outlined he will do “ background work like I did when I was coaching.
” “ You just don ’ t jump out there and decide you ’ re going to throw a ‘ Hail Mary ’ pass — or a halfback pass .
You ’ ve got to have a reason why you ’ re doing it .
There ’ s no doubt I ’ m a huge Donald Trump guy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Alabama are , ” he remarked .
This has the makings for a very interesting January 6th session of Congress .
This could be Tuberville ’ s first act as a Senator if he decides to do this .
What a way to make a splash !

It looks like Tommy Tuberville could be the one Senator who, on January 6th, joins House Republicans in objecting to electoral votes from certain states on January 6th:
YELLOW HAMMER NEWS – In a phone interview with Yellowhammer News on Thursday, U.S. Senator-elect Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) spoke about his thoughts on the planned effort by some U.S. House Republicans to challenge the Electoral College votes of certain states on January 6. The effort is being led by Congressman Mo Brooks (AL-05), however the formal support of at least one senator is still needed to force floor debate and votes by each chamber on the respective states in question. The electors of each state voted on Monday, and the results would put Joe Biden into office on January 20 if they are accepted by Congress. Tuberville this week has been back on the campaign trail, this time traveling across Georgia supporting U.S. Senators Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) and David Perdue (R-GA) as part of the “Save America” bus tour.
Tuberville says he’s going to do his ‘due diligence’ before he commits to objecting:
Speaking to Yellowhammer News, Tuberville emphasized that he has not made up his mind on whether he will support the congressional challenge; he outlined that he will be doing his “due diligence,” studying the issue and soliciting feedback from his constituents before taking a stance. This aligns with his pledge while running for election and then during his November 3 victory speech that he will represent the wishes of the majority of his constituents as a senator. “I want to do what’s best for President Trump and the people of Alabama and the people of this country,” Tuberville said on Thursday. “They asked me, ‘Are you going to support President Trump?’ And, of course, I’m always going to support President Trump. He’s the best president of my lifetime and has done more for the people of this country and the state of Alabama than anybody. But we want to make sure we do the right thing.” He explained that he has been getting a large number of emails and text messages, as well as in-person feedback while campaigning in Georgia, about Brooks’ effort the past few days. The former Auburn University head football coach said the large majority of what he is hearing is people concerned about alleged voter fraud during the 2020 presidential election. “Now that I’m off the road I’m going to start doing my due diligence,” Tuberville advised. “It’s not like you have to make your mind up in the next 24 hours. I’ll probably meet with Mo Brooks and get his side of it.” He expects his “due diligence” to be conducted “through Christmas.” Tuberville outlined he will do “background work like I did when I was coaching.” “You just don’t jump out there and decide you’re going to throw a ‘Hail Mary’ pass — or a halfback pass. You’ve got to have a reason why you’re doing it. There’s no doubt I’m a huge Donald Trump guy, as most people in the state of Alabama are,” he remarked.
This has the makings for a very interesting January 6th session of Congress. This could be Tuberville’s first act as a Senator if he decides to do this. What a way to make a splash!


therightscoop--2020-12-18--Hawley to force vote on $1200 coronavirus check in Senate tomorrow

I ’ ve been reading recently that the best anyone can expect from a pandemic stimulus check in the new aid bill , like we saw earlier this year , is about $ 600 or $ 700 dollars .
But Senator Hawley is trying to double that number to $ 1200 and intends to force a floor vote on it tomorrow : According to The Hill , “ Under the Senate rules any one senator can ask for a vote but any one senator can object.
” Hawley is suggesting he might slow down the process to speed up the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t get his vote : Hawley , in a separate interview with reporters in the Capitol , didn ’ t rule out that someone blocking his vote could impact if he lets leadership speed up the eventual agreement .
In order to speed up votes in the Senate they ’ ll need cooperation from every senator .
“ It might , ” Hawley said .
“ I ’ ve said all along I want to have a vote.
” I honestly don ’ t understand how the stimulus checks have been cut @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , when it was Pelosi who was demanding $ 2 trillion earlier this year .
Not that we can really afford another big stimulus .
Heck , we couldn ’ t afford what we spent earlier this year but we had to do it after the government shut everything down .
I ’ d say we need this one too as far as businesses and unemployment assistance .
But boy are we racking up the debt this year .

I’ve been reading recently that the best anyone can expect from a pandemic stimulus check in the new aid bill, like we saw earlier this year, is about $600 or $700 dollars. But Senator Hawley is trying to double that number to $1200 and intends to force a floor vote on it tomorrow:
Tomorrow I will go to the Senate floor to ask for an up or down vote on my bill to provide a direct payment of $1200 to working Americans, $2400 for couples, $500 for kids. This is the #covid relief working families need — Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) December 17, 2020
According to The Hill, “Under the Senate rules any one senator can ask for a vote but any one senator can object.”
Hawley is suggesting he might slow down the process to speed up the bill if someone objects and he doesn’t get his vote:
Hawley, in a separate interview with reporters in the Capitol, didn’t rule out that someone blocking his vote could impact if he lets leadership speed up the eventual agreement. In order to speed up votes in the Senate they’ll need cooperation from every senator. “It might,” Hawley said. “I’ve said all along I want to have a vote.”
I honestly don’t understand how the stimulus checks have been cut in half with this new aid bill, when it was Pelosi who was demanding $2 trillion earlier this year. Not that we can really afford another big stimulus. Heck, we couldn’t afford what we spent earlier this year but we had to do it after the government shut everything down. I’d say we need this one too as far as businesses and unemployment assistance. But boy are we racking up the debt this year.