theconservativetreehouse--2020-11-19--UPDATE: Treehouse 2.0 – Migrating Site After Deplatforming by WordPress/Automattic…

First things first , a major THANK YOU to all of those who have stood up to show support after we were notified of being kicked-out of WordPress/Automattic web hosting in a transparent effort to remove our research content , discussion and political speech .
Notable thanks to Rush Limbaugh , Mark Steyn , Thomas Lifson , Jack Cashill , John Solomon , PJ Media , NewsMax , Lee Smith , Instapundit , Steve Bannon , Doug Ross , and hundreds of other important voices who showed support .
At an unnerving time it is overwhelming , humbling and very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the internet receive that support .
CTH will not soon forget those who stand the gap together .
Additionally , hundreds of offers for assistance and pro-bono services are more than a little overwhelming ; and the thousands of emails and contacts from people who recognized what this means in the bigger picture and reached out with support .
Thank you !
We could complete another decade and still never get around to expressing the appreciation we feel as we move forward , steadfast .
CTH will always work diligently to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I think we all recognize this specific issue is not about our Treehouse ; rather the stark nature of the issue represents a considerable change in tone amid Big Tech to exert pressure upon voices who express an opinion counter to the accepted narrative .
We are in very tenuous times , perhaps an inflection point , where political speech is controlled .
The republicans have done their familiar hand-wringing , teeth-gnashing and running to the microphones shtick to decry the Big Tech censorship… which is to say : they have typically done @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rebel Alliance is once again on our own .
All of that said , unfortunately it is with an expectation the censorship will only get worse that we must advance our stewardship of the Treehouse community by ensuring the next website will not be vulnerable to any more advanced efforts at removal .
In order to continue the original goal of brutal sunlight upon the issues and challenges we outline , Treehouse 2.0 must be able to withstand any future efforts to deplatform our voice .
After a decade of research assembly this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than seven million comments .
Each of those comments contains a unique web addy .
Combined with the internal citations , graphs and graphics that formulate the baseline of the research and analysis , that collective content represents a great deal of data to transfer to the next platform , which must be also strong and independent enough to continue the mission .
We believe the tech engineers and system platform design selected for Treehouse 2.0 will represent those objectives with diligence and foresight .
And we are excited to begin anew @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not even possible when CTH was originally launched .
Some exceptionally kind people have requested a subscription platform ; however , it has always been my mission to provide the raw and cited details , with an opinion toward what it means , totally free for everyone to use as they choose .
I do not consider my finished products proprietary because they can always be made better by smart researchers who can find even more details for bigger story , and make it better .
The site openness and accessibility is as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when The Last Refuge of misfits first assembled 10 years ago .
CTH will never charge for access to the truth as we can discover it .
Additionally , this is your home .
Myself and the incredibly hardworking site admins consider ourselves stewards to this community .
YOU are what matters , so another important part of Treehouse 2.0 is to ensure your ability to analyze , discuss and provide your comments on the subject matter .
We will NEVER remove a commenting function from our website .
In fact , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a community that has been the most thrilling and brilliant part of our work together .
I ain ’ t losing that focus .
One area of discussion is the “ blog roll ” feature where we have always tried to link to a network of sites where additional content can be found .
In Treehouse 2.0 we may shift from site links to individual writer links where your favorite authors can independently launch their latest articles inside the architecture of CTH .
Essentially a blogroll of people , not websites .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a work in progress .
But I like the concept .
Based on the number of daily site visitors , essentially the scale of readership , strong architecture to support scale will almost certainly mean higher hosting fees .
However , if we can build-in proprietary or aggregate ad revenue it would likely offset the costs .
We are fortunate to have a large audience and significant page views , so increased site costs could be manageable .
However , that also means we must guard against demonetization , which is another significant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to crush voices they oppose .
It is a manageable risk , but must be factored into Treehouse 2.0 with prudent forethought .
The size of CTH influence -the daily site views/visits- is what put us on the targeted radar , Treehouse 2.0 must also be able to operate at a scale accordingly .
I used to joke about staying as small as possible : “ eyes of a mouse , ears of an elephant ” , that worked until now .
I ’ ll also let you in on a secret , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ visually a little quirky .
The “ rag-tag ” had a purpose .
The quality of content , much of which is assembled through our crowd-sourcing , was the driver of growth ; we didn ’ t really care what it looked like .
Despite my own preference to remain rag-tag , Treehouse 2.0 will likely be a bit more , well , ‘ fancy ‘ .
The key to Treehouse 2.0 is recognizing we are building something within a system that wants to see us removed .
Being proactive about that will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conversation .
Remember , YOU are the important part .
Without you CTH doesn ’ t really have a purpose .
I could stand outside shouting at trees with no impact ; but together , sitting on the figurative porch , the conversation is rich with unique skill-sets , subject matter experts , and life-long experiences that make discussion so much more valuable .
Myself and the CTH admin team cherish the value you represent .
There were many great suggestions about pre-existing platforms to migrate toward .
However , we have a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all of the above in mind Treehouse 2.0 has specific needs .
The proprietary research library is secure , we are now meeting to set up the architecture , and I appreciate your patience as the ordinary level of content is somewhat slowed by the amount of time coordinating the move .
I dislike the feeling of not being able to just share the brutal truths as I see them in this very tenuous time .
I very much dislike having to watch what I say for fear of running afoul of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the switch and shut us down prior to the previously announced WordPress/Automattic eviction date of December 2nd .
Y ’ all probably figured out by now that Sundance does not cotton to being restrained .
I look forward to Treehouse 2.0 when we can get back in the fight ; likely with an increased ferocity .
Apparently it was unsettling to the monitors when I said : “ Trump because F**K YOU , is a very powerful force !
“ … The free speech police didn ’ t like that .
It was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million of y ’ all get it… I know you do .
Smile bigly and live your best life , it will all be OK .
Steadfast wolverines , “ the best is yet to come.
” Borrowing from Mike Vanderboegh – This is no small thing , to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption .
I have studied history for years and I can not recall it ever happening .
It may be that our task is impossible .
Yet , if we do not try then how will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ done ?
And if we do not try , it most certainly won ’ t be done .
The Founders ’ Republic , and the larger war for western civilization , will be lost .
But I tell you this : We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night .
Indeed , we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note , even if they despise us in the writing of it .
And when we are gone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs , tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again , as it must , generations later .
We will live forever , like the Spartans at Thermopylae , in sacred memory .
With profound appreciation for your time and attention , and the most warm of regards .

First things first, a major THANK YOU to all of those who have stood up to show support after we were notified of being kicked-out of WordPress/Automattic web hosting in a transparent effort to remove our research content, discussion and political speech.
Notable thanks to Rush Limbaugh, Mark Steyn, Thomas Lifson, Jack Cashill, John Solomon, PJ Media, NewsMax, Lee Smith, Instapundit, Steve Bannon, Doug Ross, and hundreds of other important voices who showed support.
At an unnerving time it is overwhelming, humbling and very much appreciated to have our little corner of the internet receive that support.
CTH will not soon forget those who stand the gap together.
Additionally, hundreds of offers for assistance and pro-bono services are more than a little overwhelming; and the thousands of emails and contacts from people who recognized what this means in the bigger picture and reached out with support. Thank you!
We could complete another decade and still never get around to expressing the appreciation we feel as we move forward, steadfast. CTH will always work diligently to be deserving of that support and fellowship.
I think we all recognize this specific issue is not about our Treehouse; rather, the stark nature of the issue represents a considerable change in tone amid Big Tech to exert pressure upon voices who express an opinion counter to the accepted narrative. We are in very tenuous times, perhaps an inflection point, where political speech is controlled.
The republicans have done their familiar hand-wringing, teeth-gnashing and running to the microphones shtick to decry the Big Tech censorship… which is to say: they have typically done nothing about it. Alas, the Rebel Alliance is once again on our own.
All of that said, unfortunately it is with an expectation the censorship will only get worse that we must advance our stewardship of the Treehouse community by ensuring the next website will not be vulnerable to any more advanced efforts at removal. In order to continue the original goal of brutal sunlight upon the issues and challenges we outline, Treehouse 2.0 must be able to withstand any future efforts to deplatform our voice.
After a decade of research assembly this current site hosts over 35,000 articles and more than seven million comments. Each of those comments contains a unique web addy. Combined with the internal citations, graphs and graphics that formulate the baseline of the research and analysis, that collective content represents a great deal of data to transfer to the next platform, which must be also strong and independent enough to continue the mission.
We believe the tech engineers and system platform design selected for Treehouse 2.0 will represent those objectives with diligence and foresight. And we are excited to begin anew with some new technological aspects that were not even possible when CTH was originally launched.
Some exceptionally kind people have requested a subscription platform; however, it has always been my mission to provide the raw and cited details, with an opinion toward what it means, totally free for everyone to use as they choose.
I do not consider my finished products proprietary because they can always be made better by smart researchers who can find even more details for a bigger story, and make it better. The site openness and accessibility is as important to me now as it was when The Last Refuge of misfits first assembled 10 years ago. CTH will never charge for access to the truth as we can discover it.
Additionally, this is your home. Myself and the incredibly hardworking site admins consider ourselves stewards to this community. YOU are what matters, so another important part of Treehouse 2.0 is to ensure your ability to analyze, discuss and provide your comments on the subject matter. We will NEVER remove a commenting function from our website. In fact, it is the crowd-sourcing work we have done as a community that has been the most thrilling and brilliant part of our work together. I ain’t losing that focus.
One area of discussion is the “blog roll” feature where we have always tried to link to a network of sites where additional content can be found. In Treehouse 2.0 we may shift from site links to individual writer links where your favorite authors can independently launch their latest articles inside the architecture of CTH. Essentially a blogroll of people, not websites. How exactly to do this is still a work in progress. But I like the concept.
Based on the number of daily site visitors, essentially the scale of readership, strong architecture to support scale will almost certainly mean higher hosting fees. However, if we can build-in proprietary or aggregate ad revenue it would likely offset the costs.
We are fortunate to have a large audience and significant page views, so increased site costs could be manageable. However, that also means we must guard against demonetization, which is another significant attack approach used by those who seek to crush voices they oppose. It is a manageable risk, but must be factored into Treehouse 2.0 with prudent forethought.
The size of CTH influence -the daily site views/visits- is what put us on the targeted radar, Treehouse 2.0 must also be able to operate at a scale accordingly. I used to joke about staying as small as possible: “eyes of a mouse, ears of an elephant”, that worked until now.
I’ll also let you in on a secret, that’s why we kept CTH visually a little quirky. The “rag-tag” had a purpose. The quality of content, much of which is assembled through our crowd-sourcing, was the driver of growth; we didn’t really care what it looked like. Despite my own preference to remain rag-tag, Treehouse 2.0 will likely be a bit more, well, ‘fancy‘.
The key to Treehouse 2.0 is recognizing we are building something within a system that wants to see us removed. Being proactive about that will hopefully make us better stewards for our conversation. Remember, YOU are the important part.
Without you CTH doesn’t really have a purpose. I could stand outside shouting at trees with no impact; but together, sitting on the figurative porch, the conversation is rich with unique skill-sets, subject matter experts, and life-long experiences that make discussion so much more valuable. Myself and the CTH admin team cherish the value you represent.
There were many great suggestions about pre-existing platforms to migrate toward. However, we have a unique set of priorities; and with all of the above in mind, Treehouse 2.0 has specific needs. The proprietary research library is secure, we are now meeting to set up the architecture, and I appreciate your patience as the ordinary level of content is somewhat slowed by the amount of time coordinating the move.
I dislike the feeling of not being able to just share the brutal truths as I see them in this very tenuous time. I very much dislike having to watch what I say for fear of running afoul of the speech monitors who would like to flip the switch and shut us down prior to the previously announced WordPress/Automattic eviction date of December 2nd.
Y’all probably figured out by now that Sundance does not cotton to being restrained. I look forward to Treehouse 2.0 when we can get back in the fight; likely with an increased ferocity.
Apparently it was unsettling to the monitors when I said: “Trump because F**K YOU, is a very powerful force!“… The free speech police didn’t like that. It was all downhill from there.
But 73 million of y’all get it… I know you do.
Smile bigly and live your best life, it will all be OK.
Steadfast wolverines, “the best is yet to come.”
~ Sundance
Borrowing from Mike Vanderboegh – This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can’t be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won’t be done. The Founders’ Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.
But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.
And when we are gone, the scattered, free survivors hiding in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs, tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again, as it must, generations later. We will live forever, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, in sacred memory.
With profound appreciation for your time and attention, and the most warm of regards.


theconservativetreehouse--2020-11-19--Thursday November 19th – Open Thread

Thursday November 19th – Open Thread

Our Father , who art in heaven , hallowed be thy Name .
Thy kingdom come .
THY WILL BE @ @ @ @ @ it is in heaven .
Give us this day our daily bread .
And forgive @ @ @ @ @ we forgive those who trespass against us .
And lead us not into temptation , @ @ @ @ @ .
For Thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory , forever and @ @ @ @

Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy Name. Thy kingdom come. THY WILL BE DONE, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but DELIVER US FROM EVIL.
For Thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory, forever and ever. Amen †


theconservativetreehouse--2020-11-20--November 20th – 2020 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #1401

Post was not sent - check your email addresses !
Email check failed , please try again Sorry , your @ @ @ @ @ by email .

In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the Donald Trump Administration and Presidency.
This thread will refresh daily and appear above the Open Discussion Thread.
President Trump Twitter @POTUS / Vice President Pence Twitter @VP
Kayleigh McEnany Twitter @PressSec


theconservativetreehouse--2020-11-20--Friday November 20th – Open Thread

Friday November 20th – Open Thread


Fundamental Chains…

REPOSTED BY REQUEST – Understanding the bigger picture is to understand how the “ fundamental change ” issues are not directly connected to the ongoing 2020 debate challenges , ballot issues , election outcome , etc ; yet , the “ fundamental change ” issues required a Biden election .
Why is COVID-19 so important politically ?
This discussion thread explains why… Many Americans buy into the narrative that COVID-19 is a grave health threat to the nation .
When common sense people engage with the COVID fear community you often hear the masked herd say : if COVID is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the entire world involved ; and what would be the purpose .
What follows below is the purpose .
There is a COVID-19 virus ; however , COVID is not more dangerous than all other flu-like viruses that impact the respiratory system .
COVID-19 is very manageable and doesn ’ t carry a higher fatality rate .
Why is COVID-19 being disproportionately hyped as such a dangerous threat , when the reality of the statistical danger is much less than the intense level of hype ?
… That is the key question @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the guise of COVID-19 mitigation , are the entry point for the goals and aspirations of the political left on a national and global scale .
COVID-19 is a virus , but also a very important political weapon , and we are about to discover exactly what the purpose of the hype is all about .
What follows will help understand ; and when you encounter the fear it will help to reconcile what people can not figure out .
Joe Biden is an avatar ; a political pawn ; a cognitively declining @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happening around him .
The people behind the Biden campaign , those in real control of what this is about , have not hidden their goals and aspirations .
These are not stupid people .
They are scheming , conniving , ever-planning , ever-manipulating & Machiavellian types within the political system ; lusting for power , influence and affluence .
What they are planning to do is weaponize COVID-19 to attain ideological objectives .
This is why they hyped the fear within it for almost a year .
Nothing within their plan requires @ @ @ @ @ @ @ body in Washington DC .
COVID is the tool to “ fundamentally change ” the way the United States exists .
On October 23rd , those behind the Biden campaign dropped all pretense , openly having their candidate state publicly his intention to control the lives of all Americans using the authority of a weaponized federal government to advance national COVID-19 regulations .
As you watch this video from Biden ’ s campaign it is important to remember state government officials have already moved to define “ essential businesses ” and “ essential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That is going to become a bigger issue downstream ; however , for now just watch closely what Joe Biden is saying here : The Dept of Transportation would be the agency enforcing a national interstate transit mask requirement .
However , don ’ t focus on the DoT part of what he was saying… that ’ s only one creek… Instead focus on the downstream use of all federal regulatory agencies and how they align within a Federal COVID compliance network… that ’ s the river .
Think about the Dept of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dept .
of Labor , the Dept of Education , the Occupational Health and Safety Administration ( OSHA ) , Housing and Urban Development , Health and Human Services , Dept of Labor , Dept of Energy and how they would join with the DoT to create the aggregate raging river of regulation .
Think about the federal government using mandates for enforced national COVID-19 compliance rules .
Think about USDA ( Dept of Agriculture ) and OSHA federal inspections for social distancing ( etc ) in all businesses , not just restaurants @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compliance system and what political beneficiaries stand to gain .
Think about the Dept of Education using COVID to restructure the way education is taught and the downstream regulations on charter schools and non-compliant educational systems that do not meet the ideological objectives of the master control plan .
Think about how the Dept .
of Labor ( complaint division ) can be weaponized against political opposition based on arbitrary inspections under the guise of employee health and safety… .
using federal COVID compliance rules .
Think about required days off for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is identified in the workplace .
Paid days off… .
funded by Federal Government .
Think about how that changes the income dependency dynamic .
Think about the larger Green New Deal ( goals and objectives ) , and then contrast those objectives while aligning an overlay map of how federal COVID mitigation rules can be applied as a back door to the EXACT SAME objective .
Far , far , far , beyond masks… .
Workspaces being forced to be redesigned .
New rules on labor density .
New rules on labor/manufacturing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ uniforms .
New rules on hand-washing stations .
New rules on sick pay , shift hours , time-off when a COVID infection is detected in the workplace .
Think about everything from rules on surfaces , to rules on packaging , to rules on ALL business operations as an outcome of federal regulatory policy under the guise of CVOID-19 mitigation .
OSHA , Labor , Agriculture , Transportation , Energy , Education , Housing , Health and Human Services , and even federal building permits… the entire regulatory system and compliance network .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ HUD ) having new rules about dwellings and complexes for housing grants .
Population density ; the need to move into the suburbs and the confiscation of private property to “ ensure the common safety ” of the citizens .
If you think this is fear-mongering , I want to to evaluate that cynicism while contemplating this recent example from California : Think about those types of business regulations applied on a National level… .
and then , as seen in prior Democrat administrations with IRS etc , think about them also being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Think about how states that refuse to participate will be cut off from federal grants and funding for college tuition , Medicare and/or medicaid reimbursement , etc .
etc .
Think about what happens to Main Street USA ?
Think about companies on the NASDAQ or national companies on the stock-market ?
Think about how those USA-specific federal COVID compliance regulations apply when considering U.S. business operations -vs- just taking operations overseas without those worries .
Think about who in Washington DC then takes control of what types of business interests are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ winning and losing .
Think about how Federal COVID-19 regulations can be used to put the multinational corporate world back ( the globalists ) on their former financial pathways , even without TPP and TTIP trade deals .
[ Every domestic regulation weaponized against Main Street USA is a win for the Wall Street multinationals . ]
Think about how much China and Europe would love to see our economy knee-capped in a Biden regulatory stranglehold ; essentially achieving the same objectives as the Paris Climate Treaty .
Think long and hard about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Green New Deal can extend under the auspices of federal COVID-19 mitigation .
Remember , those who are working on this don ’ t care about the middle-class and they have not for decades .
The visibility of the ‘ rust belt ’ is the reference .
This is about government bureaucrats using their DC power-base to control trillions in economic value and sell their ability to influence the winners and losers to the highest foreign bidder .
Look at what blue states have already done to seize power and control .
Now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ throughout the entire country by weaponizing federal agencies with advanced regulation .
That should start to frame the reference point going forward .
Remember , within totalitarian states religion is a risk… the assembly for religious worship is always considered a risk to by those who demand control over free-thought and lives .
The national legislative priority will be entirely focused on retention of that power system by generating an entirely new form of congressional representation .
New states , new senators , new election systems , and funding for the needs of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ focus of the facilitating legislative branch .
Those behind the executive branch ; those controlling Joe Biden ; will harness and weaponize the power .
The legislative leftists will attempt to ensure the new systems they create under the guise of COVID-19 are never in a position to be withdrawn .
Those are the stakes .

REPOSTED BY REQUEST – Understanding the bigger picture is to understand how the “fundamental change” issues are not directly connected to the ongoing 2020 debate challenges, ballot issues, election outcome, etc; yet, the “fundamental change” issues required a Biden election.
Why is COVID-19 so important politically? This discussion thread explains why…
Many Americans buy into the narrative that COVID-19 is a grave health threat to the nation. When common sense people engage with the COVID fear community you often hear the masked herd say: if COVID is a conspiracy of sorts, then why is the entire world involved; and what would be the purpose. What follows below is the purpose.
There is a COVID-19 virus; however, COVID is not more dangerous than all other flu-like viruses that impact the respiratory system. COVID-19 is very manageable and doesn’t carry a higher fatality rate.
Why is COVID-19 being disproportionately hyped as such a dangerous threat, when the reality of the statistical danger is much less than the intense level of hype?… That is the key question.
The answer is… social changes under the guise of COVID-19 mitigation, are the entry point for the goals and aspirations of the political left on a national and global scale. COVID-19 is a virus, but also a very important political weapon, and we are about to discover exactly what the purpose of the hype is all about. What follows will help understand; and when you encounter the fear it will help to reconcile what people cannot figure out.
Joe Biden is an avatar; a political pawn; a cognitively declining guy who has no idea what is happening around him. The people behind the Biden campaign, those in real control of what this is about, have not hidden their goals and aspirations. These are not stupid people. They are scheming, conniving, ever-planning, ever-manipulating & Machiavellian types within the political system; lusting for power, influence and affluence.
What they are planning to do is weaponize COVID-19 to attain ideological objectives. This is why they hyped the fear within it for almost a year. Nothing within their plan requires the approval or consent of any representative body in Washington DC. COVID is the tool to “fundamentally change” the way the United States exists.
On October 23rd, those behind the Biden campaign dropped all pretense, openly having their candidate state publicly his intention to control the lives of all Americans using the authority of a weaponized federal government to advance national COVID-19 regulations.
As you watch this video from Biden’s campaign it is important to remember state government officials have already moved to define “essential businesses” and “essential workers” during the forced shut-downs. That is going to become a bigger issue downstream; however, for now just watch closely what Joe Biden is saying here:
.
The Dept of Transportation would be the agency enforcing a national interstate transit mask requirement. However, don’t focus on the DoT part of what he was saying… that’s only one creek… Instead focus on the downstream use of all federal regulatory agencies and how they align within a Federal COVID compliance network… that’s the river.
Think about the Dept of Agriculture (SNAP/food stamps), the Dept. of Labor, the Dept of Education, the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA), Housing and Urban Development, Health and Human Services, Dept of Labor, Dept of Energy and how they would join with the DoT to create the aggregate raging river of regulation.
Think about the federal government using mandates for enforced national COVID-19 compliance rules. Think about USDA (Dept of Agriculture) and OSHA federal inspections for social distancing (etc) in all businesses, not just restaurants.
Think about the COVID-19 regulatory and compliance system and what political beneficiaries stand to gain.
Think about the Dept of Education using COVID to restructure the way education is taught and the downstream regulations on charter schools and non-compliant educational systems that do not meet the ideological objectives of the master control plan.
Think about how the Dept. of Labor (complaint division) can be weaponized against political opposition based on arbitrary inspections under the guise of employee health and safety…. using federal COVID compliance rules.
Think about required days off for the entire employee base if a single infection is identified in the workplace. Paid days off…. funded by Federal Government. Think about how that changes the income dependency dynamic.
Think about the larger Green New Deal (goals and objectives), and then contrast those objectives while aligning an overlay map of how federal COVID mitigation rules can be applied as a back door to the EXACT SAME objective.
Far, far, far, beyond masks…. Workspaces being forced to be redesigned. New rules on labor density. New rules on labor/manufacturing and office proximity. New rules on uniforms. New rules on hand-washing stations. New rules on sick pay, shift hours, time-off when a COVID infection is detected in the workplace.
Think about everything from rules on surfaces, to rules on packaging, to rules on ALL business operations as an outcome of federal regulatory policy under the guise of CVOID-19 mitigation. OSHA, Labor, Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Education, Housing, Health and Human Services, and even federal building permits… the entire regulatory system and compliance network.
Think about Housing and Urban Development (HUD) having new rules about dwellings and complexes for housing grants. Population density; the need to move into the suburbs and the confiscation of private property to “ensure the common safety” of the citizens.
If you think this is fear-mongering, I want to to evaluate that cynicism while contemplating this recent example from California:
Think about those types of business regulations applied on a National level…. and then, as seen in prior Democrat administrations with IRS etc, think about them also being enforced through the prism of political affiliation.
Think about how states that refuse to participate will be cut off from federal grants and funding for college tuition, Medicare and/or medicaid reimbursement, etc. etc.
Think about what happens to Main Street USA?
Think about companies on the NASDAQ or national companies on the stock-market?
Think about how those USA-specific federal COVID compliance regulations apply when considering U.S. business operations -vs- just taking operations overseas without those worries.
Think about who in Washington DC then takes control of what types of business interests are allowed to operation…. who determines the winning and losing.
Think about how Federal COVID-19 regulations can be used to put the multinational corporate world back (the globalists) on their former financial pathways, even without TPP and TTIP trade deals.
[Every domestic regulation weaponized against Main Street USA is a win for the Wall Street multinationals.]
Think about how much China and Europe would love to see our economy knee-capped in a Biden regulatory stranglehold; essentially achieving the same objectives as the Paris Climate Treaty.
Think long and hard about how far the tentacles of achieving the Green New Deal can extend under the auspices of federal COVID-19 mitigation.
Remember, those who are working on this don’t care about the middle-class and they have not for decades. The visibility of the ‘rust belt’ is the reference. This is about government bureaucrats using their DC power-base to control trillions in economic value and sell their ability to influence the winners and losers to the highest foreign bidder.
Look at what blue states have already done to seize power and control. Now think about that same manipulative intent spread throughout the entire country by weaponizing federal agencies with advanced regulation.
That should start to frame the reference point going forward. Remember, within totalitarian states religion is a risk… the assembly for religious worship is always considered a risk to by those who demand control over free-thought and lives.
The national legislative priority will be entirely focused on retention of that power system by generating an entirely new form of congressional representation. New states, new senators, new election systems, and funding for the needs of the executive…. that will be the focus of the facilitating legislative branch.
Those behind the executive branch; those controlling Joe Biden; will harness and weaponize the power. The legislative leftists will attempt to ensure the new systems they create under the guise of COVID-19 are never in a position to be withdrawn.
Those are the stakes.


theconservativetreehouse--2020-11-20--The Agenda of Fox News Many Have Forgotten and Perhaps Many More Do Not Know…

I wrote about this in 2014/2015 , followed the dynamic and refreshed it again in 2017 .
However , with increased sunlight on the agenda of Fox News , perhaps a review of this history is needed again .
Back when the 2014 “ Comprehensive Immigration Reform ” agenda was swirling in the senate ; you might remember the “ gang of eight ” immigration bill ; specific media entities inside and outside FOX media were involved in private discussions to promote the agenda .
{ GO DEEP } Two of those outside FOX voices were Laura Ingraham and Tucker @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surprise to see FOX News Rupert Murdoch hire them later as prime-time hosts .
This is all about following the money and the FOX agenda ; ie .
inside baseball stuff : During the 2015 Fox Business News GOP Primary debate several political junkies noted a rather curious and brutally obvious omission : Senator Marco Rubio was never questioned about the 2013 Senate Gang-of-Eight bill and his stance on Comprehensive Immigration Reform .
In fact , if you were to review the 2015 debate substance you ’ d note candidate Rubio wasn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at all .
It is not disconnected that during the 2013/2014 Gang-of-Eight immigration constructs we later discovered Fox News was an active participant in the promotion of the immigration reform proposals .
In order to facilitate the congressional immigration intent Fox launched a previously unknown pro-amnesty propaganda blitz to support senate immigration bill .
What follows below is an evidenced expose ’ of their agenda .
Candidate Jeb Bush attends Chamber of Commerce dinner with Fox ’ s Rupert Murdoch and Valerie Jarrett ( December 2014 ) ♦ It was in 2014 when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Carlson , then a Fox contributor and now prime-time show host , for writing an article in the Daily Caller outlining the relationship between Rupert Murdoch , his company Fox News , the talking heads under his control and authority , and Murdoch ’ s request for pro-amnesty propaganda to be broadcast on the network .
Tucker Carlson took down the article from the Daily Caller , and subsequently Mickey Kaus quit in disgust over the agenda-driven editorial decision .
Apparently some things are just too sensitive for sunlight and exposure .
However @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pattern within Fox to push immigration reform and included a first person excerpt between David Axelrod and Rupert Murdoch : On page 424 of his recent memoir , Obama ’ s former top strategist David Axelrod describes running into Fox chieftain ( and immigration amnesty supporter ) Rupert Murdoch at a dinner in the fall of 2010 : Kaus goes on to outline how Fox News followed the plan and conspicuously avoided any mention of the crafting : “ in the spring of 2013 when the “ Gang of 8 ” amnesty bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ uses a historical timeline , day-by-day story leads , showing how Fox was intentionally NOT COVERING the story ( see here ) .
♦ However , even before Kaus discovered -and outlined- proof of what his research into Fox revealed there was a prior article written by Ryan Lizza in The New Yorker Magazine [ June 2013 ] which was even more revealing : New Yorker 2013 – [ … ] Fox News has notably changed its tone since the election .
A Democratic policy staffer who worked on the issue in 2007 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said , “ NumbersUSA and ” —two groups that want to dramatically limit immigration— “ managed to convince Fox News back then to be their twenty-four-hour news channel of the anti-immigrant point of view .
Fox has now totally bought in to the idea that we just need to figure something out.
” Rush Limbaugh , who fiercely opposes the bill , has come to sound resigned .
“ I don ’ t know if there ’ s any stopping this , ” he said on January 28th , the day the Gang @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the legislation .
“ It ’ s up to me and Fox News , and I don ’ t think Fox News is that invested in this.
” McCain told me , “ Rupert Murdoch is a strong supporter of immigration reform , and Roger Ailes is , too.
” Murdoch is the chairman and C.E.O .
of News Corp. , which owns Fox , and Ailes is Fox News ’ s president .
McCain said that he , Graham , Rubio , and others also have talked privately to top hosts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reilly , Sean Hannity , and Neil Cavuto , who are now relatively sympathetic to the Gang ’ s proposed bill .
Hannity voiced support for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants , which he previously dismissed as “ amnesty , ” on the day after the 2012 election .
“ God bless Fox , ” Graham said .
“ Last time , it was ‘ amnesty ’ every fifteen seconds.
” He said that the change was important for his reelection , because “ eighty per cent of people in my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He added that the network has “ allowed critics to come forward , but it ’ s been so much better.
” ( link ) So there ’ s a trio of GOPe Republicans in the so-called Gang of Eight huddled with leading figures at Fox News Channel .
A few days later Bill O ’ Reilly interviews Marco Rubio and urges the Senator to come to him if anyone opposes the proposal .
♦ As you watch this segment in retrospect , with the information you now possess , consider that both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have pre-discussed the entire topic and worked out exactly what the framework of questions and answers would be : Rupert Murdoch , Wall Street , The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the entire GOPe apparatus -including House Speaker Paul Ryan- are 100 % behind comprehensive immigration reform to include amnesty .
Back to Fox News and their debate agenda – The executive in charge of Fox News debate programming , debate questioning and debate structure is Vice President Bill Sammon .
( circled below ) The Washington Post has an outline describing how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fox regarding debates ; and how he is the person who Chris Stirewalt , Megyn Kelly , Chris Wallace and Brett Baier directly reported to for all debate issues , construction , and question organization .
Bill Sammon ’ s daughter is Brooke Sammon who was the national press secretary for Marco Rubio ’ s presidential campaign .
Now , lets contrast this information against the backdrop of Rupert Murdoch ’ s response to the republican debate .
There is a particular clarity that resonates , no ?
Mr. Rupert Murdoch , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fox programming , also contracts pollster Frank Luntz to appear on Fox News broadcasting during the 2015 and 2016 election cycle .
Frank Luntz had sub-contracts with Marco Rubio and a long-term relationship with Rubio going back to the Freshman Senator ’ s time in the Florida Legislature .
Rubio alone has paid Luntz $ 350,000+ It ’ s not accidental that Frank Luntz focus groups regularly found Marco Rubio as the winner of debate and opinion programming .
In an extensive 2016 article within New York Magazine , mostly outlining the rather @ @ @ @ @ @ @ may also noted confirmation from August of ( 2015 ) .
Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch instructed Fox News executives to take down candidate Donald Trump .
( NY MAG ) [ … ] Murdoch was not a fan of Trump ’ s and especially did not like his stance on immigration .
( The antipathy was mutual : “ Murdoch ’ s been very bad to me , ” Trump told me in March . )
A few days before the first GOP debate on Fox in August 2015 , Murdoch called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gone on long enough , ” Murdoch said , according to a person briefed on the conversation .
Murdoch told Ailes he wanted Fox ’ s debate moderators — Kelly , Bret Baier , and Chris Wallace — to hammer Trump on a variety of issues .
Ailes , understanding the GOP electorate better than most at that point , likely thought it was a bad idea .
“ Donald Trump is going to be the Republican nominee , ” Ailes told a colleague around this time .
But he didn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ On the night of August 6 , in front of 24 million people , the Fox moderators peppered Trump with harder-hitting questions .
But it was Kelly ’ s question regarding Trump ’ s history of crude comments about women that created a media sensation .
He seemed personally wounded by her suggestion that this spoke to a temperament that might not be suited for the presidency .
“ I ’ ve been very nice to you , though I could probably maybe not be based on the way you have treated me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ read more ) A July 2017 article written by Roger Ailes confidant Michael Wolff affirms one of the more transparently obvious hidden secrets in the 2015/2016 presidential race and election .
Fox News owner/mogul Rupert Murdoch was intensely against the candidacy of Donald Trump .
So much so that Murdoch instructed former President of Fox News , Roger Ailes , to shape favorable coverage toward anyone other than Donald Trump , including a request to tilt toward support for Hillary Clinton .
New York – [ … ] It was Ailes ’ tacit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , made his removal from Fox all the more urgent for the Murdochs .
And it was not just the liberal sons who were agitated by Ailes ’ regard for Trump , but also the father , whose tabloid , the New York Post , helped create Trump , but who found him now , with great snobbery , not of “ our ” conservative class .
( “ When is Donald Trump going to stop embarrassing his friends , let alone the whole country ?
” Murdoch senior tweeted the day after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) Murdoch instructed Ailes to tilt to anyone but Trump , Ailes confided to me before he was fired , even Hillary .
( Ailes , for his part , characterized Murdoch ’ s periodic efforts at interference as similar to Nixon ’ s instructions to bomb this or that country — best ignored . )
All intellectually honest media and political observers already knew this was the basic premise for Fox News in the 2015/2016 presidential race .
Murdoch supported Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio as the frontrunners because each of them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interests of Rupert Murdoch .
The August 2015 ambush by Murdoch ’ s princess Megyn Kelly was merely a highly visible example of Murdoch ’ s aversion to the ‘ America-First ’ agenda of Donald Trump .
Ms. Kelly was later paid $ 10 million by Harper Collins , another Murdoch company , as compensation for services rendered , ie .
advance payment on her book deal .
However , what most people don ’ t recognize is the motives behind these activities .
There were/are billions of dollars at stake from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Maintaining control of multinational corporate trade policy and influence ; along with retention of multinational “ Wall Street ” banking policy ; in conjunction with open border mass immigration policy is still the primary objective of the Big Club .

I wrote about this in 2014/2015, followed the dynamic and refreshed it again in 2017. However, with increased sunlight on the agenda of Fox News, perhaps a review of this history is needed again. Back when the 2014 “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” agenda was swirling in the senate; you might remember the “gang of eight” immigration bill; specific media entities inside and outside FOX media were involved in private discussions to promote the agenda. {GO DEEP}
Two of those outside FOX voices were Laura Ingraham and Tucker Carlson; so it was not a surprise to see FOX News Rupert Murdoch hire them later as prime-time hosts. This is all about following the money and the FOX agenda; ie. inside baseball stuff:
During the 2015 Fox Business News GOP Primary debate several political junkies noted a rather curious and brutally obvious omission: Senator Marco Rubio was never questioned about the 2013 Senate Gang-of-Eight bill and his stance on Comprehensive Immigration Reform. In fact, if you were to review the 2015 debate substance you’d note candidate Rubio wasn’t directly questioned about his immigration positions at all.
It is not disconnected that during the 2013/2014 Gang-of-Eight immigration constructs we later discovered Fox News was an active participant in the promotion of the immigration reform proposals.
In order to facilitate the congressional immigration intent Fox launched a previously unknown pro-amnesty propaganda blitz to support senate immigration bill.
What follows below is an evidenced expose’ of their agenda.
Candidate Jeb Bush attends Chamber of Commerce dinner with Fox’s Rupert Murdoch and Valerie Jarrett (December 2014)
♦ It was in 2014 when writer Mickey Kaus was chastised by Tucker Carlson, then a Fox contributor and now prime-time show host, for writing an article in the Daily Caller outlining the relationship between Rupert Murdoch, his company Fox News, the talking heads under his control and authority, and Murdoch’s request for pro-amnesty propaganda to be broadcast on the network.
Tucker Carlson took down the article from the Daily Caller, and subsequently Mickey Kaus quit in disgust over the agenda-driven editorial decision. Apparently some things are just too sensitive for sunlight and exposure.
However, what Mickey Kaus outlined was a pattern within Fox to push immigration reform and included a first person excerpt between David Axelrod and Rupert Murdoch:
On page 424 of his recent memoir, Obama’s former top strategist David Axelrod describes running into Fox chieftain (and immigration amnesty supporter) Rupert Murdoch at a dinner in the fall of 2010:
During the dinner, Murdoch, who was seated beside me, insisted that the president had to move on immigration reform. …. “But the solution has to be comprehensive,” I said. “We can’t just attack a piece of the immigration problem. And you know, there’s one big thing that you can do to help, and that is to keep your cable network from stoking the nativism that keeps us from solving this.” [Emphasis added] (link)
Kaus goes on to outline how Fox News followed the plan and conspicuously avoided any mention of the crafting: “in the spring of 2013 when the “Gang of 8” amnesty bill snuck through the Senate“. Mickey uses a historical timeline, day-by-day story leads, showing how Fox was intentionally NOT COVERING the story (see here).
♦ However, even before Kaus discovered -and outlined- proof of what his research into Fox revealed there was a prior article written by Ryan Lizza in The New Yorker Magazine [June 2013] which was even more revealing:
New Yorker 2013 – […] Fox News has notably changed its tone since the election. A Democratic policy staffer who worked on the issue in 2007 and has helped write the current bill said, “NumbersUSA and FAIR ”—two groups that want to dramatically limit immigration—“managed to convince Fox News back then to be their twenty-four-hour news channel of the anti-immigrant point of view. Fox has now totally bought in to the idea that we just need to figure something out.” Rush Limbaugh, who fiercely opposes the bill, has come to sound resigned. “I don’t know if there’s any stopping this,” he said on January 28th, the day the Gang held the press conference announcing its framework for the legislation. “It’s up to me and Fox News, and I don’t think Fox News is that invested in this.” McCain told me, “Rupert Murdoch is a strong supporter of immigration reform, and Roger Ailes is, too.” Murdoch is the chairman and C.E.O. of News Corp., which owns Fox, and Ailes is Fox News’s president. McCain said that he, Graham, Rubio, and others also have talked privately to top hosts at Fox, including Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Neil Cavuto, who are now relatively sympathetic to the Gang’s proposed bill. Hannity voiced support for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, which he previously dismissed as “amnesty,” on the day after the 2012 election. “God bless Fox,” Graham said. “Last time, it was ‘amnesty’ every fifteen seconds.” He said that the change was important for his reelection, because “eighty per cent of people in my primary get their news from Fox.” He added that the network has “allowed critics to come forward, but it’s been so much better.” (link)
So there’s a trio of GOPe Republicans in the so-called Gang of Eight huddled with leading figures at Fox News Channel. A few days later Bill O’Reilly interviews Marco Rubio and urges the Senator to come to him if anyone opposes the proposal.
♦ As you watch this segment in retrospect, with the information you now possess, consider that both Bill O’Reilly and Marco Rubio have pre-discussed the entire topic and worked out exactly what the framework of questions and answers would be:
.
Rupert Murdoch, Wall Street, The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the entire GOPe apparatus -including House Speaker Paul Ryan- are 100% behind comprehensive immigration reform to include amnesty.
Back to Fox News and their debate agenda – The executive in charge of Fox News debate programming, debate questioning and debate structure is Vice President Bill Sammon. (circled below)
The Washington Post has an outline describing how Bill Sammon runs the entire show at Fox regarding debates; and how he is the person who Chris Stirewalt, Megyn Kelly, Chris Wallace and Brett Baier directly reported to for all debate issues, construction, and question organization.
In essence, Bill Sammon runs the show.
Bill Sammon’s daughter is Brooke Sammon who was the national press secretary for Marco Rubio’s presidential campaign.
Now, lets contrast this information against the backdrop of Rupert Murdoch’s response to the republican debate.
There is a particular clarity that resonates, no?
Mr. Rupert Murdoch, who is also leading the executive decision-making on Fox programming, also contracts pollster Frank Luntz to appear on Fox News broadcasting during the 2015 and 2016 election cycle.
[…] since June, Murdoch has been attending Ailes’s daily executive meeting held on the second floor of Fox headquarters. The secretive afternoon gathering in Ailes’s conference room is attended by about a half-dozen of the network’s most senior lieutenants. It’s where some of the most sensitive decisions about running the channel are discussed. (link)
Frank Luntz had sub-contracts with Marco Rubio and a long-term relationship with Rubio going back to the Freshman Senator’s time in the Florida Legislature. Rubio alone has paid Luntz $350,000+ It’s not accidental that Frank Luntz focus groups regularly found Marco Rubio as the winner of debate and opinion programming.
In an extensive 2016 article within New York Magazine, mostly outlining the rather sordid details of Roger Ailes, readers may also noted confirmation from August of (2015). Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch instructed Fox News executives to take down candidate Donald Trump.
Excerpt:
(NY MAG) […] Murdoch was not a fan of Trump’s and especially did not like his stance on immigration. (The antipathy was mutual: “Murdoch’s been very bad to me,” Trump told me in March.) A few days before the first GOP debate on Fox in August 2015, Murdoch called Ailes at home. “This has gone on long enough,” Murdoch said, according to a person briefed on the conversation.
Murdoch told Ailes he wanted Fox’s debate moderators — Kelly, Bret Baier, and Chris Wallace — to hammer Trump on a variety of issues. Ailes, understanding the GOP electorate better than most at that point, likely thought it was a bad idea. “Donald Trump is going to be the Republican nominee,” Ailes told a colleague around this time. But he didn’t fight Murdoch on the debate directive.
On the night of August 6, in front of 24 million people, the Fox moderators peppered Trump with harder-hitting questions. But it was Kelly’s question regarding Trump’s history of crude comments about women that created a media sensation. He seemed personally wounded by her suggestion that this spoke to a temperament that might not be suited for the presidency. “I’ve been very nice to you, though I could probably maybe not be based on the way you have treated me,” he said pointedly. (read more)
A July 2017 article written by Roger Ailes confidant Michael Wolff affirms one of the more transparently obvious hidden secrets in the 2015/2016 presidential race and election.
Fox News owner/mogul Rupert Murdoch was intensely against the candidacy of Donald Trump. So much so that Murdoch instructed former President of Fox News, Roger Ailes, to shape favorable coverage toward anyone other than Donald Trump, including a request to tilt toward support for Hillary Clinton.
New York – […] It was Ailes’ tacit support of Trump that, in part, made his removal from Fox all the more urgent for the Murdochs. And it was not just the liberal sons who were agitated by Ailes’ regard for Trump, but also the father, whose tabloid, the New York Post, helped create Trump, but who found him now, with great snobbery, not of “our” conservative class. (“When is Donald Trump going to stop embarrassing his friends, let alone the whole country?” Murdoch senior tweeted the day after Trump officially declared himself a candidate.) Murdoch instructed Ailes to tilt to anyone but Trump, Ailes confided to me before he was fired, even Hillary. (Ailes, for his part, characterized Murdoch’s periodic efforts at interference as similar to Nixon’s instructions to bomb this or that country — best ignored.)
After the election, a confounded Murdoch had to call on his ex-wife Wendi’s friends, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, to broker a rapprochement with the disreputable Donald. Now, to Trump’s great satisfaction, a humbled Murdoch is a constant caller. (read more)
All intellectually honest media and political observers already knew this was the basic premise for Fox News in the 2015/2016 presidential race. Murdoch supported Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio as the frontrunners because each of them advanced policies that were beneficial to the interests of Rupert Murdoch.
The August 2015 ambush by Murdoch’s princess Megyn Kelly was merely a highly visible example of Murdoch’s aversion to the ‘America-First’ agenda of Donald Trump. Ms. Kelly was later paid $10 million by Harper Collins, another Murdoch company, as compensation for services rendered, ie. advance payment on her book deal.
However, what most people don’t recognize is the motives behind these activities. There were/are billions of dollars at stake from the policies and outcomes of the election.
Maintaining control of multinational corporate trade policy and influence; along with retention of multinational “Wall Street” banking policy; in conjunction with open border mass immigration policy is still the primary objective of the Big Club.


theconservativetreehouse--2020-11-20--Tucker Carlson Targets Sidney Powell…

Tucker Carlson Targets Sidney Powell…

The video segment below is unlikely to remain visible because it is against the interests of Fox News .
However @ @ @ @ @ News Host Tucker Carlson tonight decided to target President Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell .
@ @ @ @ @ providing evidence to him for her claim that votes and machines were modified to reduce @ @ @ @ @ Biden .
Carlson was is upset at Powell , saying : … ” she never @ @ @ @ @ a lot of requests , polite requests , not a page .
When we kept @ @ @ @ @ told us to stop contacting her .
When we checked with others around the Trump @ @ @ @ @ of authority , they told us Powell has never given them any evidence of either @ @ @ @ @ any today at the press conference.
” I ’ m not exactly sure why Carlson @ @ @ @ @ evidence to him or face his criticism ; but that ’ s the position of @ @ @ @ @ He has done this before .

The video segment below is unlikely to remain visible because it is against the interests of Fox News. However, in the interim Fox News Host Tucker Carlson tonight decided to target President Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell.
Tucker chastised Powell for not providing evidence to him for her claim that votes and machines were modified to reduce Donald Trump and inflate Joe Biden. Carlson was is upset at Powell, saying:
…”she never sent us any evidence despite a lot of requests, polite requests, not a page. When we kept pressing she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump campaign, people with positions of authority, they told us Powell has never given them any evidence of either, nor has she provided any today at the press conference.”
I’m not exactly sure why Carlson demands Sidney Powell give her evidence to him or face his criticism; but that’s the position of the Fox News host. He has done this before.


theconservativetreehouse--2020-11-19--Sidney Powell: “We Will Not Be Intimidated”…

Sidney Powell ’ s heart beats with pulse of American patriotism .
“ In terms of the level of corruption @ @ @ @ @ , we have no idea how many Republican or Democratic candidates… paid to have the @ @ @ @ @ them.
” – Sidney Powell We already knew the metadata available in the NSA database @ @ @ @ @ contractors to any politically connected high bidder .
That data is worth trillions .
Does @ @ @ @ @ Dominion election engineers would offer their services to both sides of the political equation .
@ @ @ @ @ services ?
How many currently sitting political leaders know the phone number to Dominion election @ @ @ @ @ GOP leaders want an actual investigation ?
Once you see the strings on the marionettes…

Sidney Powell’s heart beats with pulse of American patriotism. “In terms of the level of corruption we are looking at here, we have no idea how many Republican or Democratic candidates… paid to have the system rigged to work for them.” – Sidney Powell
.
We already knew the metadata available in the NSA database is for sale by private contractors to any politically connected high bidder. That data is worth trillions.
Does it not seem likely that Dominion election engineers would offer their services to both sides of the political equation. How many campaigns purchased those services? How many currently sitting political leaders know the phone number to Dominion election services? You think the GOP leaders want an actual investigation?
Once you see the strings on the marionettes…


theconservativetreehouse--2020-11-19--President Trump’s Campaign Legal Team Stand The Gap – Full Press Conference…

Earlier today Rudy Giuliani , Sidney Powell and some members of President Trump ’ s legal campaign team held a @ @ @ @ @ of specific election fraud and take questions from Joe Biden ’ s national assembly of @ @ @ @ @ starts at 58:35 prompted just hit play : “ THESE are the times that try @ @ @ @ @ The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will , in this crisis , shrink from @ @ @ @ @ ; but he that stands it now , deserves the love and thanks of man @ @ @ @ @ like hell , is not easily conquered ; yet we have this consolation with us @ @ @ @ @ conflict , the more glorious the triumph .
What we obtain too cheap , we @ @ @ @ @ is dearness only that gives every thing its value .
Heaven knows how to put @ @ @ @ @ goods ; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM @ @ @ @ @ .
”

Earlier today Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell and some members of President Trump’s legal campaign team held a press conference to outline evidence of specific election fraud and take questions from Joe Biden’s national assembly of narrative engineers.
The presser starts at 58:35 prompted just hit play:
“THESE are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.” ~ Thomas Paine, The Crisis No. I (written 19 December 1776, published 23 December 1776)
The YouTube ID of buQCdCSDWQQ?start=3515 is invalid.


theconservativetreehouse--2020-11-19--White House Coronavirus Task Force Press Briefing – 4:15pm ET Livestream

The members of the White House Coronavirus Task Force are expected to hold a press briefing this afternoon around 4:15 to 4:30pm ET. [Livestream Links Below]
White House Livestream – Fox News Livestream – Alternate Livestream Link
.
.
.


theconservativetreehouse--2020-11-20--Sidney Powell Discusses Status of Election Investigation With Glenn Beck – Dominion and Smartmatic

Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell has a very interesting interview with BlazeTV Glenn Beck to discuss ongoing “ election rigging @ @ @ @ @ ballot counting ( software ) as well as foreign actors engaged in data gathering .
@ @ @ @ @ to begin sharing documents as early as this weekend , but the scope of the @ @ @ @ @ complete .

Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell has a very interesting interview with BlazeTV Glenn Beck to discuss ongoing “election rigging” involving companies involved in ballot counting (software) as well as foreign actors engaged in data gathering.
Powell states she is hopeful to begin sharing documents as early as this weekend, but the scope of the investigation is taking time to complete.