veteranstoday--2020-07-25--Nearly 3,500 Pubic Health Experts Tell Trump to Listen to Science

Current and Former Health Officials , Physicians , and Scientific Experts Sign Letter Denouncing White House Attacks on NIAID Director by Center for Science in the Public Interest Nearly 3,500 of the nation ’ s leading public health experts are speaking out against White House attacks on National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Director Dr. Anthony S. Fauci and are calling on President Donald Trump not to sideline science or scientists as the country continues to reel from the COVID-19 pandemic .
The signers include two former Commissioners of the Food and Drug Administration , two former directors of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a former Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services , a former Surgeon General , several leading medical journal editors , and hundreds of the nation ’ s most prominent physicians , researchers , and public health experts .
The open letter to President Trump was drafted by former FDA Associate Commissioner Dr. Peter Lurie , now President of the Center for Science in the Public Interest , and epidemiologist and longtime AIDS activist Gregg Gonsalves , now of Yale School of Public Health , who began circulating the open @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week and last , the White House mounted a campaign to discredit one of our nation ’ s leading scientific experts , Dr. Anthony Fauci , the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , who has advised six Presidents on epidemics….read more : ATTENTION READERS Due to the nature of independent content , VT can not guarantee content validity .
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT 's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ content is owned by author exclusively .
Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT , other authors , affiliates , advertisers , sponsors , partners or technicians .
Some content may be satirical in nature .
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT. About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy Due to the nature of independent content , VT can not guarantee content validity.We ask you toso a clear comprehension of VT 's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media.All content is owned by author exclusively .
Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT , other authors , affiliates , advertisers , sponsors , partners or technicians .
Some content may be satirical in nature .
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT .

Nearly 3,500 Public Health Experts Signal Support for Fauci
Current and Former Health Officials, Physicians, and Scientific Experts Sign Letter Denouncing White House Attacks on NIAID Director
by Center for Science in the Public Interest
Nearly 3,500 of the nation’s leading public health experts are speaking out against White House attacks on National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Director Dr. Anthony S. Fauci and are calling on President Donald Trump not to sideline science or scientists as the country continues to reel from the COVID-19 pandemic. The signers include two former Commissioners of the Food and Drug Administration, two former directors of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a former Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, a former Surgeon General, several leading medical journal editors, and hundreds of the nation’s most prominent physicians, researchers, and public health experts.
The open letter to President Trump was drafted by former FDA Associate Commissioner Dr. Peter Lurie, now President of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, and epidemiologist and longtime AIDS activist Gregg Gonsalves, now of Yale School of Public Health, who began circulating the open letter on Friday evening.
“This week and last, the White House mounted a campaign to discredit one of our nation’s leading scientific experts, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who has advised six Presidents on epidemics….read more:


veteranstoday--2020-07-25--Again: Hydroxychloroquine Does Not Improve Outcomes for COVID-19 Patients

Health Editor ’ s Note : Trump has publicly toted ‘ cures and preventions ’ for COVID-19 .
One of these fake cures and one that he admitted to be taking , has continued to be from time to time generally recommended for treatment quality , by anyone who is writing non-peer reviewed medical articles .
We have known for weeks that chloroquine and hydroychloroquine do not help patients with COVID-19 , but are more likely to harm them by changing the electrical activity of the heart in a bad way .
You will continue to see articles written by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about how we are missing the boat if we do not use these drugs for treatments .
This particular study is quite easy to understand and has all the parts needed to qualify this as a legitimate study .
Can we please stop any further strolling down this hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine dead end alley ?
….Carol Hydroxychloroquine with or without Azithromycin in Mild-to-Moderate Covid-19 Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin have been used to treat patients with coronavirus disease 2019 ( Covid-19 ) .
However , evidence on the safety and efficacy of these therapies is limited .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ open-label , three-group , controlled trial involving hospitalized patients with suspected or confirmed Covid-19 who were receiving either no supplemental oxygen or a maximum of 4 liters per minute of supplemental oxygen .
Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive standard care , standard care plus hydroxychloroquine at a dose of 400 mg twice daily , or standard care plus hydroxychloroquine at a dose of 400 mg twice daily plus azithromycin at a dose of 500 mg once daily for 7 days .
The primary outcome was clinical status at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a seven-level ordinal scale ( with levels ranging from one to seven and higher scores indicating a worse condition ) in the modified intention-to-treat population ( patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Covid-19 ) .
Safety was also assessed .
A total of 667 patients underwent randomization ; 504 patients had confirmed Covid-19 and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis .
As compared with standard care , the proportional odds of having a higher score on the seven-point ordinal scale at 15 days was not affected by either hydroxychloroquine alone ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.69 to 2.11 ; P=1.00 ) or hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin ( odds ratio , 0.99 ; 95 % CI , 0.57 to 1.73 ; P=1.00 ) .
Prolongation of the corrected QT interval and elevation of liver-enzyme levels were more frequent in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine , alone or with azithromycin , than in those who were not receiving either agent .

Health Editor’s Note: Trump has publicly toted ‘cures and preventions’ for COVID-19. One of these fake cures and one that he admitted to be taking, has continued to be from time to time generally recommended for treatment quality, by anyone who is writing non-peer reviewed medical articles.
We have known for weeks that chloroquine and hydroychloroquine do not help patients with COVID-19, but are more likely to harm them by changing the electrical activity of the heart in a bad way. You will continue to see articles written by those who have no real medical knowledge about how we are missing the boat if we do not use these drugs for treatments. This particular study is quite easy to understand and has all the parts needed to qualify this as a legitimate study. Can we please stop any further strolling down this hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine dead end alley?….Carol
Hydroxychloroquine with or without Azithromycin in Mild-to-Moderate Covid-19
New England Journal of Medicine
Alexandre B. Cavalcanti, M.D., Ph.D.,
Fernando G. Zampieri, M.D., Ph.D.,
Regis G. Rosa, M.D., Ph.D.,
Luciano C.P. Azevedo, M.D., Ph.D.,
Viviane C. Veiga, M.D., Ph.D.,
Alvaro Avezum, M.D., Ph.D.,
Lucas P. Damiani, M.Sc.,
Aline Marcadenti, Ph.D.,
Letícia Kawano-Dourado, M.D., Ph.D.,
Thiago Lisboa, M.D., Ph.D.,
Debora L. M. Junqueira, M.D.,
Pedro G.M. de Barros e Silva, M.D., Ph.D.,
et al.,
for the Coalition Covid-19 Brazil I Investigators* BACKGROUND Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin have been used to treat patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, evidence on the safety and efficacy of these therapies is limited. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-group, controlled trial involving hospitalized patients with suspected or confirmed Covid-19 who were receiving either no supplemental oxygen or a maximum of 4 liters per minute of supplemental oxygen. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive standard care, standard care plus hydroxychloroquine at a dose of 400 mg twice daily, or standard care plus hydroxychloroquine at a dose of 400 mg twice daily plus azithromycin at a dose of 500 mg once daily for 7 days. The primary outcome was clinical status at 15 days as assessed with the use of a seven-level ordinal scale (with levels ranging from one to seven and higher scores indicating a worse condition) in the modified intention-to-treat population (patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Covid-19). Safety was also assessed. RESULTS A total of 667 patients underwent randomization; 504 patients had confirmed Covid-19 and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. As compared with standard care, the proportional odds of having a higher score on the seven-point ordinal scale at 15 days was not affected by either hydroxychloroquine alone (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 2.11; P=1.00) or hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.73; P=1.00). Prolongation of the corrected QT interval and elevation of liver-enzyme levels were more frequent in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine, alone or with azithromycin, than in those who were not receiving either agent. Read More:
Carol graduated from Riverside White Cross School of Nursing in Columbus, Ohio and received her diploma as a registered nurse. She attended Bowling Green State University where she received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in History and Literature. She attended the University of Toledo, College of Nursing, and received a Master’s of Nursing Science Degree as an Educator. She has traveled extensively, is a photographer, and writes on medical issues. Carol has three children RJ, Katherine, and Stephen – one daughter-in-law; Katie – two granddaughters; Isabella Marianna and Zoe Olivia – and one grandson, Alexander Paul. She also shares her life with her husband Gordon Duff, many cats, and two rescues. Carol’s Archives 2009-2013


veteranstoday--2020-07-24--Intel Drop, July 24, 2020: Trump secretly cancels election (updated)

Two days ago , Trump ordered the USAF to place a Dornier “ Wolfhound ” aircraft over Portland , Oregon .
A similar aircraft was overhead during the assassination of General Soleimani and during the fake gas attacks at Khan Shiekhoun in Syria .
The air force runs “ black ops ” with such a plane , ops that include false flag terrorism .
VT editor Stephen Avery piloted a similar craft for the Air Force during his career , on classified missions .
We can ’ t prove that Coronavirus was unleashed in the US in order to facilitate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ However , we accept it as a possibility and even a likelihood .
We do know that Donald Trump has issued a presidential order cancelling the election based on a national emergency , COVID 19 and Chinese interference in the election tied to “ treason ” by Joe Biden and key American political figures whose names are already on arrest warrants .
Trump has already built an unconstitutional police force based on the model of the Pinkertons or the American Legionaires who tried to arrest Franklin Roosevelt as part of the ‘ Business @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Marine General Smedley Butler .
With Trump now hopelessly behind in the polls , experts around the country are getting wind of what VT ’ s inside sources in Washington have confirmed , that Trump has no intention of leaving the White House .
Trump had , months ago , told congressional republicans that he would not accept the results of an election .
As stated by Senator Tim Worth in Newsweek , Trump planned to declare the election rigged and would order Biden ’ s arrest as a “ Chinese spy.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ago , presented Trump an opinion allowing him to overrule an election using emergency powers while Barr would start investigating allegations of Chinese interference on behalf of Biden Our sources tell us that Donald Trump has , this week , issued an order to cancel the November presidential election .
He has issued orders for the arrest of Joe Biden and other Democratic Party leaders .
His announcement that the GOP convention is cancelled is a step in his plan .
The plan was to send the election , eventually to the House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a clear majority , the very odd rules tying state delegations to “ electors ” would give Trump 26 states and a victory .
This plan , roughly outlined in the Philip Roth novel and HBO special , ‘ The Plot Against America , ’ was set aside as too risky .
Trump has chosen the “ nuclear option ” instead .
He has thus far formed a 60,000 man force from border patrol , TSA , Homeland Security , US Marshals , prison guards and private contractors , to begin , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the US .
He then plans to federalize the National Guard .
Arrest warrants for more than a dozen state governors and a similar number of mayors of major cities have also been issued .
Word we get from Washington is that a cabal has been formed , Supreme Court justices , Lindsey Graham , Evangelical leaders and some within the military , funded by Russian oligarchs and Saudi Arabia .
Traitors within the Pentagon are planning to sink an American aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf , blaming it on Iran .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ die as a result .
GOP operatives across the US are meeting secretly with police officials telling them to no longer take orders from civil authority and that they are now , by presidential order , members of a secret militia answerable only to Donald Trump .
Many departments are already stopping 911 responses .
Preliminary steps to put this into motion were done under George W. Bush but never enacted .
This is what the “ Israeli training ” was always about , reaching into thousands of police agencies for “ bad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blackmailed , and as we all know only too well that this is extremely easy with American police .
We watched the plan move forward in Portland .
Weeks ago , GOP operatives began moving in , no more than 40 .
They began organizing violence and looting , often “ leading from the rear , ” as agent provocateurs .
This has been done in city after city as any peaceful demonstration has to turn violent .
Where the party doesn ’ t have people , police are used and this was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accusation by Jo Ann Hardesty , who later was forced to walk back her observations .
The plan in Portland was classic , agent provocateurs for sure but even more clever .
Barr had written an opinion that allows the Federal Government to bring in forces if key facilities like courts are threatened .
In order to assure that , Trump ’ s prison guards attacked the Wall of Moms ( they even gassed the mayor ) and then withdrew to the court .
Their “ agents , ” mostly Portland police dressed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ chase ” back to the Federal Court House .
This is part of the Sun Tzu “ golden bridge ” principle , but in reverse .
Thus , fake demonstrators , really police , lead the attacks on monuments , court buildings and provide the photo ops .
Were Patrick Swayze alive , he would see what is coming .
This is “ Red Dawn , ” the communist invasion of the United States .
In reality , it is 4 years old already .

by VT Staff
Two days ago, Trump ordered the USAF to place a Dornier “Wolfhound” aircraft over Portland, Oregon. A similar aircraft was overhead during the assassination of General Soleimani and during the fake gas attacks at Khan Shiekhoun in Syria.
The air force runs “black ops” with such a plane, ops that include false flag terrorism. VT editor Stephen Avery piloted a similar craft for the Air Force during his career, on classified missions.
We can’t prove that Coronavirus was unleashed in the US in order to facilitate a takeover of the United States. However, we accept it as a possibility and even a likelihood.
We do know that Donald Trump has issued a presidential order cancelling the election based on a national emergency, COVID 19 and Chinese interference in the election tied to “treason” by Joe Biden and key American political figures whose names are already on arrest warrants.
Trump has already built an unconstitutional police force based on the model of the Pinkertons or the American Legionaires who tried to arrest Franklin Roosevelt as part of the ‘Business Plot’ in 1933 until stopped by Marine General Smedley Butler.
With Trump now hopelessly behind in the polls, experts around the country are getting wind of what VT’s inside sources in Washington have confirmed, that Trump has no intention of leaving the White House.
Trump had, months ago, told congressional republicans that he would not accept the results of an election. As stated by Senator Tim Worth in Newsweek, Trump planned to declare the election rigged and would order Biden’s arrest as a “Chinese spy.”
Attorney General Barr had, some weeks ago, presented Trump an opinion allowing him to overrule an election using emergency powers while Barr would start investigating allegations of Chinese interference on behalf of Biden
Our sources tell us that Donald Trump has, this week, issued an order to cancel the November presidential election. He has issued orders for the arrest of Joe Biden and other Democratic Party leaders. His announcement that the GOP convention is cancelled is a step in his plan.
The plan was to send the election, eventually to the House of Representatives where, though the Democrats have a clear majority, the very odd rules tying state delegations to “electors” would give Trump 26 states and a victory.
This plan, roughly outlined in the Philip Roth novel and HBO special, ‘The Plot Against America,’ was set aside as too risky. Trump has chosen the “nuclear option” instead.
He has thus far formed a 60,000 man force from border patrol, TSA, Homeland Security, US Marshals, prison guards and private contractors, to begin, not quell, violence in cities across the US.
He then plans to federalize the National Guard. Arrest warrants for more than a dozen state governors and a similar number of mayors of major cities have also been issued.
Word we get from Washington is that a cabal has been formed, Supreme Court justices, Lindsey Graham, Evangelical leaders and some within the military, funded by Russian oligarchs and Saudi Arabia.
Traitors within the Pentagon are planning to sink an American aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf, blaming it on Iran. An estimated 2000 Americans are likely to die as a result.
GOP operatives across the US are meeting secretly with police officials telling them to no longer take orders from civil authority and that they are now, by presidential order, members of a secret militia answerable only to Donald Trump.
Many departments are already stopping 911 responses. Preliminary steps to put this into motion were done under George W. Bush but never enacted. This is what the “Israeli training” was always about, reaching into thousands of police agencies for “bad apples” who could be bribed or blackmailed, and as we all know only too well that this is extremely easy with American police.
We watched the plan move forward in Portland. Weeks ago, GOP operatives began moving in, no more than 40. They began organizing violence and looting, often “leading from the rear,” as agent provocateurs. This has been done in city after city as any peaceful demonstration has to turn violent. Where the party doesn’t have people, police are used and this was also the case in Portland, an accusation by Jo Ann Hardesty, who later was forced to walk back her observations.
The plan in Portland was classic, agent provocateurs for sure but even more clever. Barr had written an opinion that allows the Federal Government to bring in forces if key facilities like courts are threatened.
In order to assure that, Trump’s prison guards attacked the Wall of Moms (they even gassed the mayor) and then withdrew to the court. Their “agents,” mostly Portland police dressed as “Antifa,” organized a “chase” back to the Federal Court House.
This is part of the Sun Tzu “golden bridge” principle, but in reverse. Thus, fake demonstrators, really police, lead the attacks on monuments, court buildings and provide the photo ops.
Were Patrick Swayze alive, he would see what is coming. This is “Red Dawn,” the communist invasion of the United States. In reality, it is 4 years old already.


veteranstoday--2020-07-24--Trump’s War on America: USAF ‘Wolfhound’ Special Operations Plane Deployed Against ‘Wall of Moms ter

Trump’s War on America: USAF ‘Wolfhound’ Special Operations Plane Deployed Against ‘Wall of Moms terrorists’ in Portland

Check Out This Shadowy Jet That Belongs To America ’ s ‘ Other Air Force ’ America ’ s ‘ other air force ’ belongs to the Department of State Air Wing , a hodgepodge of more than 200 mostly vintage aircraft that includes everything from OV-10 Broncos to ancient DC-3s turboprops .
The relatively modern and very modified ‘ DoJet ’ seen in these exclusive photos is apparently part of their stable .
The Fairchild-Dornier 328 family of aircraft , although not an ongoing commercial success with 327 of the type having been built before 2002 , has found @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Operations community , which flies 17 of the turboprop versions of the aircraft .
Known as the C-146 “ Wolfhounds ” by the USAF , these clandestine aircraft are often seen wearing civilian-style ‘ low-profile ’ paint schemes and are deployed all over the world to provide intra-theater logistical support for special operations forces .
The Department of State ’ s aircraft in question is a turbofan powered 328Jet model of the Fairchild-Dornier 328 family , of which 110 were built .
The aircraft seems to be in a similar configuration to Australia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Turboprop powered 328s .
These aircraft are equipped with a multi-mode pulse doppler radar built by Israel ’ s Elta , as well as a Star SAFire III Forward Looking Infra Red turret near the left main landing gear housing .
These aircraft also have an infrared line-scanner , as well as the ability to drop large items through the aircraft ’ s lower emergency hatch and through a cargo door that is operable in-flight .
Beyond the FLIR turret , it is unclear if the DOSAW ’ s 328Jet has all these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but one thing that the State Department ’ s ‘ DoJet ’ has that the Australian Maritime Authority ’ s 328s don ’ t , is a large satellite communications installation along the spine of the aircraft .
Often times , these installations allow for secure communications and streaming video to be sent anywhere in the world , which would indicate that this aircraft has a prominent communications amd/or command and control role .
As far as what this aircraft ’ s true mission may be , it remains unclear .
Maybe it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs ( INL ) to chase drug traffickers and nacro-terrorists in South America , or maybe it operates as a high-priority transport for State Department officials .
It is unlikely that the jet was procured to operate in areas where Man Portable Air Defense Systems are prevalent , such as in Iraq and Afghanistan , as the aircraft lacks missile launch detectors ( MLSs ) and any visible infrared countermeasures of any kind .
The Fairchild-Dornier 328 is a gorgeous aircraft that looks more organic than mechanical in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not built .
So whatever this new shadow jet ’ s mission truly is , it will look brazenly futuristic and elegant among the C-27s , Ch-46s , Air Tractors , Hueys and other workhorses at the DOSAW ’ s base at Patrick AFB near Cocoa Beach , Florida .
Tyler Rogoway is a defense journalist and photographer who maintains the website Foxtrot Alpha for Jalopnik.com You can reach Tyler with story ideas or direct comments regarding this or any other defense topic via the email address [ email protected ]

https://theintercept.com/2020/07/23/air-force-surveillance-plane-portland-protests/
America’s ‘other air force’ belongs to the Department of State Air Wing, a hodgepodge of more than 200 mostly vintage aircraft that includes everything from OV-10 Broncos to ancient DC-3s turboprops. The relatively modern and very modified ‘DoJet’ seen in these exclusive photos is apparently part of their stable.
The Fairchild-Dornier 328 family of aircraft, although not an ongoing commercial success with 327 of the type having been built before 2002, has found a big following in the US Special Operations community, which flies 17 of the turboprop versions of the aircraft. Known as the C-146 “Wolfhounds” by the USAF, these clandestine aircraft are often seen wearing civilian-style ‘low-profile’ paint schemes and are deployed all over the world to provide intra-theater logistical support for special operations forces.
The Department of State’s aircraft in question is a turbofan powered 328Jet model of the Fairchild-Dornier 328 family, of which 110 were built. The aircraft seems to be in a similar configuration to Australia’s Maritime Safety Authority’s Turboprop powered 328s. These aircraft are equipped with a multi-mode pulse doppler radar built by Israel’s Elta, as well as a Star SAFire III Forward Looking Infra Red turret near the left main landing gear housing. These aircraft also have an infrared line-scanner, as well as the ability to drop large items through the aircraft’s lower emergency hatch and through a cargo door that is operable in-flight.
Beyond the FLIR turret, it is unclear if the DOSAW’s 328Jet has all these upgrades, or possibly many more, but one thing that the State Department’s ‘DoJet’ has that the Australian Maritime Authority’s 328s don’t, is a large satellite communications installation along the spine of the aircraft. Often times, these installations allow for secure communications and streaming video to be sent anywhere in the world, which would indicate that this aircraft has a prominent communications amd/or command and control role.
As far as what this aircraft’s true mission may be, it remains unclear. Maybe it works as part of the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) to chase drug traffickers and nacro-terrorists in South America, or maybe it operates as a high-priority transport for State Department officials. It is unlikely that the jet was procured to operate in areas where Man Portable Air Defense Systems are prevalent, such as in Iraq and Afghanistan, as the aircraft lacks missile launch detectors (MLSs) and any visible infrared countermeasures of any kind.
The Fairchild-Dornier 328 is a gorgeous aircraft that looks more organic than mechanical in nature, as if they are grown not built. So whatever this new shadow jet’s mission truly is, it will look brazenly futuristic and elegant among the C-27s, Ch-46s, Air Tractors, Hueys and other workhorses at the DOSAW’s base at Patrick AFB near Cocoa Beach, Florida.
Tyler Rogoway is a defense journalist and photographer who maintains the website Foxtrot Alpha for Jalopnik.com You can reach Tyler with story ideas or direct comments regarding this or any other defense topic via the email address Tyler@Jalopnik.com


veteranstoday--2020-07-24--Vital: Jeff Gates, The Hate Mongers Among Us (banned archival material)

This 4-part series identifies those who induce us to hate-and describes how .
1 .
The Hate Mongers Among Us 3 .
The Use of Pliable and Reliable Assets to Advance a Narrative As the “ how ” of hate mongering becomes transparent , its common source will become apparent .
With transparency comes accountability .
That ’ s when you can watch for hate to emerge yet again to shield those who hide behind the toxic charge of “ anti-Semitism.
” With the shared knowledge of how hate is evoked and sustained , those provoked to hate can say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those complicit in inducing this evil .
Hate can be personal or geopolitical .
Those who induced us to war in the Middle East made it personal .
The murderous provocation of 911 was emotionally wrenching and intensely personal .
As a people , our gut reaction ensured that support for the war would become widespread .
In the aftermath of that mass murder on U.S. soil , Martin Peretz , editor of The New Republic , summed up the situation : “ We are all Israelis now.
” So now we can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we ’ ve never met one .
The shared mental environment was flooded with what then seemed like plausible justifications for the invasion of Iraq : Iraqi WMD ; Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda ; Iraqi meetings with Al Qaeda in Prague ; Iraqi mobile biological weapons laboratories ; Iraqi purchases of yellowcake uranium from Niger .
We now know that all those rationales were fixed around a preset agenda .
Yet a critical mass of false beliefs sufficed to take us to war .
For those skilled at inducing hate , consensus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need only be credible-and only for a limited time .
With a corrupt consensus ruling the day , anyone offering proof that Iraq was not a threat was dismissed as unpatriotic or soft on terrorism .
This 911-prompted hate fest started with Iraq , a former ally , as a U.S.-led invasion kicked off The Clash of Civilizations .
The bravado of “ bring ’ em on ” quickly became “ shock and awe ” as a vicious invasion was pursued with a relaxed “ Aw Shucks ” attitude supported with a media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ commander-in-chief nonchalantly clearing brush at his home in Crawford , Texas .
Brand America became “ We ’ re still the world ’ s biggest and baddest in the war-waging business .
Just you watch.
” And watch us go broke as America led an Atlantic coalition that , like Israel , alienated much of the Muslim world .
Plus there ’ s another strategic problem : our reason for invading Iraq was “ invalid.
” That ’ s the assessment of Defense Secretary Robert Gates .
He should know .
After the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to “ Saddam the Evil Doer ” as our rationale .
How can the rationale be invalid ?
If we ’ re all Israelis now , surely that entitles us to invade lands belonging to Muslims , kill them , transform them into refugees and , with impunity , create widespread outrage among the broader Muslim population .
Let ’ s fast-forward to nine years after a high-profile slaughter in Manhattan and survey our success in the stark light of hindsight .
Are we more secure ?
Are we more prosperous ?
Are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our children proud of the outcome ?
Israel has occupied Palestinian land for more than six decades .
The September 13th issue of Time magazine captured the Israeli sentiment : “ Why Israel Doesn ’ t Care About Peace.
” Israelis are too busy prospering to care .
Outraged Muslims are a nuisance but they ’ re now largely marginalized and , for the most part , manageable .
Is that what happened to us ?
Have Americans become Israelis ?
Not long ago an internal poll of friendly foreign intelligence agencies ranked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as friends to the U.S. versus those who are clearly foes .
Israel ranked dead last as a reliable ally .
Though their brazen theft of technical and industrial secrets is well known among those in the know , the broader U.S. public remains deceived or in denial .
Most Americans still see Israel as an ally .
The facts confirm that ’ s a dangerous delusion .
Meanwhile Mossad agents are recruiting Arab-Americans to spy on their neighbors in the U.S .
Though Tel Aviv is called on the carpet three times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ still ranks third in the aggressiveness of its U.S. operations , behind only China and Russia .
That ranking may well be out of date with Israel now first in foreign operations on U.S. soil .
Zionist Jews deployed terror and intimidation to occupy Muslim lands long before Harry Truman was induced in 1948 to recognize an extremist enclave as a legitimate nation state .
Disputes over land remain at the heart of the expansionist agenda for Greater Israel .
On September 7th , Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas asked that the U.S. settle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ settlements that threaten to derail Mideast peace talks .
Those talks have dragged on since 1967 .
Settling those disputes would disrupt the Zionist agenda .
In a telling rebuke , on September 12th , Tel Aviv rejected a proposed visit to Israel by the foreign ministers of France , Spain , Britain , Germany and Italy .
Why ?
These senior diplomats sought a remedy to that dispute in order to achieve a long-evasive peace .
Therein lies Israel ’ s strategic strength .
Absent this sustained provocation ( 43 years and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peace may become a possibility .
That ’ s a danger Tel Aviv works hard to avoid .
September 12th also saw the release of a new report indicating that 2,066 new homes would be constructed in the West Bank as soon as the temporary freeze expires September 26th .
Meanwhile back in the U.S. , Americans remain unaware of how many contracts for Homeland Security were awarded to Israeli firms or to firms owned by pro-Israelis .
Nor do Americans realize how many Homeland Security outlays have been directed to Jewish community @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more reason for Zionists-both Jewish and Christian-to create an uproar about an Islamic Community Center planned for construction two blocks from the 911 site in Manhattan .
And all the more reason for a Christian-Zionist preacher to designate the ninth anniversary of 911 as “ International Burn a Koran Day ” at his 50-member church .
The Koran gambit gained global attention , stoked by a media dominated by Jewish Zionists .
High profile political personalities ensured that this hate-mongering stunt was kept in the forefront of international news coverage in the lead-up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s best-known hate-mongering provocation .
Signs of a rift between U.S. politicians and U.S. national security Even with the media support required to sustain hate in plain sight , today ’ s background chatter suggests that those worried about U.S. national security are at work in the shadows to counter the influence of the Israel lobby .
If so , that is good news-for the United States .
When Israeli-American writer Jeff Goldberg appeared again in the news , you knew psy-ops were underway .
In March 2002 , Goldberg published in The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alliance between the religious jihadists of Al Qaeda and the secular Baathists of Iraq .
Though a nonsensical premise , his account made such an alliance appear plausible to a public lacking in knowledge of the Middle East .
Goldberg ’ s storyline made it easier for Saddam Hussein to be portrayed as both an Evil Doer and a threat to the U.S. Goldberg ’ s collaborator was James Woolsey , a former Director of the CIA and an avid Zionist .
Woolsey assured us that Iraqi intelligence officials met in Prague with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stature in intelligence lent credibility to phony intelligence fixed around an Israeli agenda .
Goldberg reemerged in July to promote Evil Doer status for Iran .
Writing in the July 22nd issue of The Atlantic , he argued the Israeli case for bombing Iran and urged that the U.S. again join the fray .
No one in mainstream media mentioned his earlier manipulation .
Based on the consistency of his “ journalism , ” it came as no surprise to see Goldberg reemerge just in time for the ninth anniversary of 911 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported by a complicit media , that murderous provocation helped persuade the U.S. to invade Iraq to remove Evil Doer Saddam Hussein .
That March 2003 agenda was first promoted in 1996 in A Clean Break , a strategy paper written for Benjamin Netanyahu by an Israeli-American team led by Richard Perle .
This Jewish-Zionist operative re-emerged in July 2001 to chair the Pentagon ’ s Defense Policy Board where he was joined by Woolsey and others supportive of this Israeli agenda .
Fast-forward to September 2010 and we find Goldberg back at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Emerging fact patterns suggest it came as no surprise to our national security apparatus that the theme of this latest well-timed Goldberg article was the Cuban leader ’ s concern that Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is “ anti-Semitic.
” The timing of this report came as a surprise to those aware that Castro has long been critical of Israel ’ s treatment of the Palestinians .
Goldberg reports he was “ summoned ” to Havana to discuss Castro ’ s fears of a global nuclear war .
After conceding in the interview @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wasn ’ t worth it , ” Castro turned to a theme of topical importance to Tel Aviv , insisting that the Iranian government must understand that Jews “ were expelled from their land , persecuted and mistreated all over the world.
” Knowing Cuba ’ s pre-revolution alliance with Meyer Lansky and other kingpins in Jewish organized crime , one must wonder if this “ journalist ” was dispatched to commence negotiations for gambling concessions as a means to fill the Castro government ’ s depleted coffers .
The recent relaxation of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a pending return to Cuba ’ s “ glory days ” as a nearby haven for organized crime .
Castro ’ s well-timed comments about persecuted Jews may have been a signal that Cuba is again open for business-any business .
At the very least , his comments were like a healing balm to nationalist Zionist settlers who have plans to construct another 19,000 home in the West Bank .
So much for those who seek to quell Israel ’ s long-running land dispute with the Palestinians in order to keep peace talks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the release of the Goldberg interview , vandals in Sacramento , California used a swastika to deface an image of Israeli basketball star Omri Casspi .
The identity of the vandals has not been confirmed .
This much has been confirmed : timing is everything when seeking to sustain a storyline .
Casting Castro as pro-Israeli was a stroke of genius .
Here ’ s where it starts of get interesting as Americans wake up to find themselves unwitting combatants in the first real Information Age War .
When waging modern-day warfare in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is routinely deployed to displace facts with false beliefs .
Thus the need for substantial and sustained influence in that domain by those determined to shape the political narrative .
No one does that better than those who induced the world ’ s greatest super power to wage a war on their behalf .
Recent developments suggest that the dynamics may be shifting in the “ field ” where political narratives are advanced and where today ’ s wars are either won or lost .
That field is the shared field of consciousness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In news reported from the Middle East on September 10 , Washington took a surprising stance in support of Iranian claims that Tehran was not building a new uranium enrichment facility .
That statement came after an Iranian dissident group , in a well-timed release , charged that Iran had a new secret nuclear site 120 kilometers north of Tehran .
That disclaimer preempted a lead editorial in The New York Times published in the U.S. later that same day-just before the ninth anniversary of 911 .
That editorial sought to give @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been dismissed as not credible .
Was this an example of U.S. national security attempting to reclaim the narrative ?
Does this signal a new aggressiveness by the U.S. in waging field-based warfare against those whose successful deceptions led us to war in the Middle East ?
Two days prior , Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a speech stating “ there may not be another chance ” for Mideast peace .
That statement came the same day that a senior Palestinian negotiator confirmed they would not recognize Israel as a Jewish state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ developments signal a crack in the Zionist agenda that has shaped U.S. foreign policy for more than six decades ?
Are Zionists losing their chokehold on the White House ?
If so , will the Israel lobby again rally Congress to Israel ’ s defense ?
Will we see another “ unbreakable bond ” resolution urging that U.S. interests continue to take second place to Tel Aviv ’ s agenda for the region ?
Will the national security interests of the U.S. prevail or will Zionist goals again triumph ?
While these events @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continued to stoke the controversy surrounding “ International Burn A Koran Day.
” The nation ’ s “ newspaper of record ” conceded that this well-timed controversy began with local coverage by The Gainesville Sun ( owned by The New York Times ) when pastor Terry Jones posted a sign outside his small church that read “ Islam is of the devil.
” By August 26th , The Times was prepared to publish a major article on Jones and the anti-Islam views of his 50-member congregation .
By September 9th , Iranian Foreign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with confidence that Zionists were responsible for the Jones plan to burn a Koran on 911 .
In a fortuitous case of timing , recordings played in a federal courtroom on September 8th showed how a government informer induced a 2009 synagogue bomb plot in New York .
The recordings made it clear that those on trial as “ homegrown terrorists bent on jihad ” were not even modestly well versed in Islam .
To make a plausible case for later use in the courtroom , the informer prompted comments consistent with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prosecution ’ s case .
Do these small chinks in the Zionist armor suggest that Israeli dominance of U.S. foreign policy may be drawing to a close ?
The Use of Pliable and Reliable Assets to Advance a Narrative Many of America ’ s most prominent political leaders were induced to comment on “ International Burn A Koran Day ” -a high profile provocation proposed by a Christian-Zionist preacher with a small congregation in a small town in Florida .
When U.S. General David Petraeus spoke out against the proposal , the issue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pastor Terry Jones who quickly became an international celebrity .
One need not dig deep to identify who may have advised General Petraeus to grant a global profile to a provocation consistent with Israeli goals for the region .
In March , as head of Central Command , Petraeus offered testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee confirming facts that have long been obvious but are seldom mentioned : our “ special relationship ” with Israel and its oppressive occupation of Palestine undermine U.S. interests in the Middle East and endanger American personnel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is often spoken of as a potential Republican presidential candidate .
Thus the chagrin among some in Washington when this high profile military leader appeared to curry favor with Max Boot , a former Wall Street Journal op-ed editor and outspoken Zionist .
In an apparent attempt to soften the candor of his written testimony before the Senate , he wrote to Boot : Boot wrote back to assure him that those comments were not necessary as Petraeus had not been described as anti-Semitic .
Boot then posted a pro-Petraeus piece on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , assuring readers that the general is not anti-Israel and dismissing his anti-Israel comments as inserted by staff in his statement-that Petraeus reviewed .
After General Petraeus , now senior commander in Afghanistan , created a high profile for the Burn-A-Koran controversy , comments were offered by Attorney General Eric Holder , Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama .
With that , the provocation went viral .
These fuel-the-fire comments were followed by a personal appeal to Pastor Jones in a phone call from Defense Secretary Robert Gates that also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could predict , even the possibility of such a psy-ops ( a Koran book burning ) was guaranteed to galvanize anti-American sentiments and catalyze anti-American demonstrations .
As the book burning gained steadily more profile , this provocation increased the probability of catalyzing long-lasting anti-American sentiments .
This stunt bears a remarkable resemblance to a Newsweek story alleging that a U.S. soldier flushed a Koran down the toilet .
Though that May 2005 account by Michael Isikoff was later withdrawn in substantial part , its publication provoked an earlier well-timed response by setting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
At first , the story gained only scant attention .
That muted response changed dramatically when Pakistani cricket star Imran Khan gave Isikoff ’ s story an international profile by announcing from Islamabad that American military personnel had desecrated a holy Islamic text .
That ’ s when this Clash of Civilizations-catalyzing , U.S.-discrediting account went viral .
In practical effect , Khan ’ s celebrity was appropriated to associate the U.S. military with conduct similar in its psy-ops effect to the profile given an American proposing to burn a Koran .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the husband of California Congresswoman Jane Harman , the Jewish Zionist chair of the Intelligence Subcommittee of the House Committee on Homeland Security .
At the time of this provocation , Newsweek was a magazine affiliate of The Washington Post newspaper , an influential opinion-shaping newspaper based in the nation ’ s capital .
In the annals of “ field-based warfare , ” the Koran-flushing story will go down in history as a classic psy-ops for its success in targeting the minds of a built-in audience outside the U.S.-cricket fans-as a vulnerable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When the high-profile Imran Khan described the alleged incident as factual , this operation transcended the literacy barrier as it provoked Muslims who did not even need to read in order to be reached-and provoked .
And because the story targeted cricket fans , its impact was disastrous to Americans while also remaining invisible to America where cricket is neither a well known activity nor a widely played sport .
In what passes for mainstream American media , the Isikoff story was called news .
In national security parlance , the well-timed launch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ psy-ops .
So far , the Koran-burning story is being attributed solely to the whims of a southern preacher .
Stay tuned .
It may be only a coincidence that Jones was a high school classmate of Rush Limbaugh , America ’ s most provocative radio talk show host .
If this sounds familiar , it should .
You may recall when the wartime role played by global media became apparent in the Clash-catalyzing “ cartoon riots ” that swept the world in February 2006 .
That reaction followed the publication in France @ @ @ @ @ @ @ graphic images of the prophet Muhammad that first appeared in a Danish newspaper in September 2005 .
Citing free speech as the rationale , cultural editor Flemming Rose published a compilation of cartoons certain to be seen by Muslims as blasphemous , including one featuring Muhammad with a bomb in place of a turban .
An Ashkenazi native of Ukraine , Rose worked as a reporter for five years in Moscow during the oligarchi-zation of Russia .
As his contribution to that nationwide fraud , he translated into Danish a fawning 1990 autobiography @ @ @ @ @ @ @ candidate Boris Yeltsin whose administration enabled the wildly successful financial pillaging of Russia .
Six of the top seven Russian oligarchs were Ashkenazim who qualified for Israeli citizenship .
Rose ’ s career tracks the trajectory of a typical media asset .
After Russia , he relocated to Washington , D.C. Again employed as a journalist , he traveled to China with Bill Clinton before returning to Moscow to work for Jyllands-Posten , a rightwing Danish publication known for its anti-immigrant news fare .
Before catalyzing the cartoon crisis , Rose published a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who heads Campus Watch .
This organization monitors , disrupts and seeks to intimidate pro-Palestinian speakers when they accept invitations to speak at U.S. colleges .
Pipes is the neoconservative , Jewish-Zionist son of “ Team B ” leader Richard Pipes a Polish emigre .
Team B was a 1976 alternative intelligence assessment whose success with phony intelligence during the presidency of Gerald Ford ( when G.H.W .
Bush was C.I.A .
Director ) informed those who fixed the intelligence that enabled the U.S. to segue seamlessly from the Cold War to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ G.W .
Bush .
After the promotion of Rose to cultural editor and publication of the provocative cartoons , CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer featured Pipes on The Situation Room .
By showcasing Pipes , Blitzer ensured the airwaves would carry his anti-Islam interpretation of the Rose-catalyzed , media-fueled crisis .
Blitzer elected not to inform the viewers of CNN ( “ the most trusted name in news ” ) that he ( Blitzer ) served as an editor of Near East Report , the Israel lobby ’ s in-house journal , or that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Post , or that he published a sympathetic book on Israeli super-spy Jonathan Pollard who did more than anyone in history to damage U.S. national security .
The ensuing crisis cost many lives while the reaction to that provocation consumed the public ’ s attention and polarized public opinion internationally .
Appearing on television , Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice used the crisis to criticize Iran and Syria , adding American credibility and military authority to stoke The Clash of Civilizations as the post-Cold War narrative .
Overall , the response heightened tensions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more reasonable as scenes of widespread outrage by Muslims fueled Islamo-phobia in the West .
To escape the media scrutiny , Rose fled to the U.S. where he vacationed in Miami .
The usual suspects stepped into the fray in support of Pastor Terry Jones ’ First Amendment right to further outrage an already outraged Muslim population for whom the Koran is a sacred text .
Supporting cast for the Jones stunt included New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg who chose an annual Iftar dinner at Gracie Mansion to cite the U.S. Constitution in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New York Times columnist Charles Blow whose prominently placed op-ed on September 11th urged that “ great American debates ” should not be “ tempered for terrorists.
” National security may ( at long last ) be catching on to how those complicit in these psy-ops use our guaranteed freedoms ( of speech , press , religion , etc . )
to undermine our freedom .
It ’ s no coincidence that those most concerned about domestic eavesdropping by national security are drawn from the same ranks as those complicit in this ongoing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ profile nature of this latest 911 anniversary ensured that agent provocateurs would use the event to keep hate alive .
The day prior , President Obama urged that Israel extend its “ temporary partial freeze ” on settlements for the sake of sustaining the peace talks .
Meanwhile Jewish Zionist Pamela Geller sponsored a speech at Ground Zero by Dutch politician Geert Wilders who likens the Koran to Mein Kampf .
A staunch supporter of Israel , Wilders is known for his incendiary speeches with a strong anti-Islam theme .
Geller , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Alisa Rosenbaum ) , advocates measures to “ Stop Islamization of America.
” She emphasizes the role of Barack Obama in doing the bidding of “ Islamic overlords ” in what she calls “ The Obama Administration ’ s War on America.
” An outspoken Jewish Zionist , Geller urges that Israel “ give up nothing.
” A regular commentator on Zionist-dominated media outlets ( CNN , Fox News , The Washington Post , The New York Times ) , she insists that Israel should “ take back Gaza ” and “ secure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the West Bank , the key area of contention on expansion of the settlements .
Geller is also a driving force behind anti-Islam hate groups working to scuttle plans for an Islamic Cultural Center two blocks from the 911 site .
Allied with others in the hate campaign , she was among the first in November 2009 to describe the shootings on Fort Hood , Texas as a “ Muslim terror attack.
” Staying on message to advance the narrative Keeping the “ anti-Semitism ” theme front-and-center remains essential to advance the hate-monger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mainstream media .
Thus the Anti-Defamation League criticized the current cover of Time magazine for what ADL President Abe Foxman suggested was a portrayal of Israelis as more interested in making money than in striking a peace accord with the Palestinians .
The article highlighted Israel ’ s booming real estate market and the pleasure Israelis are taking in late-Summer vacations .
Nevertheless , according to Foxman : “ The insidious subtext of Israeli Jews being obsessed with money echoes the age-old anti-Semitic falsehood that Jews care about money above any other interest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Palestinians.
” Foxman insisted that Managing Editor Richard Stengel issue an apology to readers both for the timing of the article and for calling up old anti-Semitic stereotypes about Jews and money .
As if right on cue , the next day filmmaker Michael Moore jumped into the Islamic Cultural Center debate , arguing that the center should not be near the 911 site but inside it as a way for Muslims to recover their religion from Islamic extremists .
In his branded controversial style , Moore could have left it at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ assured media profile to relate an account of George Washington ’ s wish to see Jews receive equal rights .
From a psy-ops perspective , the subject matter is secondary to the impressions left with the public .
The imbedding of imagery and emotion is the strategic purpose of much of what you see .
For instance , Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf , speaking to ABC ’ s “ This Week , ” said on September 12th that the controversy over the site of an Islamic Cultural Center has heightened concerns among Muslims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ felt there was “ growing Islamophobia in this country.
” That ’ s a foreseeable result of creating widely shared impressions that foster and sustain widely shared beliefs that , in turn , are kept intact with emotional triggers .
That ’ s how the hate-monger narrative progresses in plain sight .
When waging war in the shared field of consciousness , the most powerful weapon is often the power of association .
Michael Moore ’ s film success shows how it ’ s done .
In his popular Fahrenheit 911 , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the war in Iraq with “ Bush Oil.
” How was that done ?
He showed on film that one of the several dozen siblings of Osama bin Laden served on the board of advisers to the Carlyle Group , an investment banking firm in Washington , D.C. Also serving on that board was former president George H.W .
Bush , the father of George W. Bush .
Therefore , by the power of association , the war in Iraq was for “ Bush Oil.
” Storylines don ’ t need to true @ @ @ @ @ @ @ psy-ops is not reality but credibility .
Psy-ops succeed when they attract enough eyeballs to misdirect the public ’ s attention-in plain sight .
Fahrenheit 911 was produced by Miramax , a Disney subsidiary .
Miramax co-chairman Harvey Weinstein loudly claimed that Disney reneged on its promise to distribute Moore ’ s film .
Disney chief executive Michael Eisner objected-just as loudly .
The high profile sparing between these two Hollywood titans dragged on for months in mainstream media .
By the time the film was released , the interest generated by this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s film opened on a record number of screens for a “ documentary.
” At virtually no cost , that public relations ploy helped ensure an international audience for a film that discredited not only the U.S. but also the office of the president .
In its practical effect , the Moore film helped ensure there was virtually no mention of how key Zionist goals were advanced by this war-in plain sight .
Meanwhile , September 12th news reports highlighted the extradition to France from Egypt of a terrorist who reportedly planned to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Paris .
Noticeably absent were facts about the timeframe of this threat or even when the arrest was made .
That account provided an opportunity for the chief of French intelligence to make a high profile announcement that the risk of a terrorist attack on France “ has never been higher.
” This week , the French Senate is scheduled to vote a ban on wearing Islamic veils known as burgas , a vote certain to reinforce The Clash of Civilizations as the consensus narrative Also on September 12th , the leader of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Hamas forces in Gaza and the West Bank are engaged in an effort to foil peace talks.
” Israel ’ s domestic security chief told cabinet ministers “ threats are due to increase in the near future , as diplomatic developments occur…This isn ’ t just an estimate but is supported by real intelligence.
” Unmentioned in this volatile mix is the psychology of the hate monger .
The purveyors of hate routinely project onto their opponents both their own personality traits ( hatred ) and , as here , their anticipated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ likely to mean that Shin Bet will stage provocations designed to make it appear that Hamas is the instigator of violence .
For the Zionist agenda to continue in plain sight , peace must be avoided no matter what the cost .
Disruption of the peace process , in turn , must plausibly be the work of others .
The hate monger must appear to be hated ; the aggressor must plausibly appear to be the victim .
Thus the need to portray as anti-Semitic ( a hater ) those who document the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sight .
Should we see a revival of the U.S. national security apparatus , we will also see a push back against the right-wing extremist coalitions that have long ruled Israel .
However , any resistance to the Zionist agenda runs the risk that Israel ’ s masters of game theory warfare will collapse another government .
That ’ s how Tel Aviv responded when in June 1963 , President John F. Kennedy pressured David Ben-Gurion for inspections of Israel ’ s nuclear facility at Dimona .
This young president sought to ensure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not start a nuclear arms race in the Middle East .
He foresaw what we now see .
Before JFK ’ s strongly worded letter could be physically delivered , Ben-Gurion resigned citing undisclosed personal reasons .
By the time a replacement governing coalition was in place and fully functional , the Kennedy problem had been handled .
Fast-emerging circumstances suggest the likelihood of a similar strategy , particularly should there emerge any prospect of peace with the Palestinians .
As Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman candidly put it , peace is impossible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the next generation.
” Should “ Bibi ” pressure his fragile governing coalition for an extension of the “ temporary partial freeze ” on settlements , members of his nationalist government could withdraw , collapsing the government .
Key members of the coalition signaled their intentions on September 12th by announcing that any extension of the freeze will end the Netanyahu government .
On September 13th , four Likud Party members threatened to withdraw budget support if the freeze is extended .
That threat was issued as Netanyahu departed for peace talks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. Secretary of State Clinton .
The recurring possibility of governmental collapse has long given Tel Aviv leverage over peace talks sought by the U.S. That era may soon draw to a close if our national security apparatus is now guiding U.S. foreign policy .
To date , our elected officials have proven themselves unable to navigate through the manipulations often deployed by Israel to stymie agreement on the terms of a peace accord .
Tel Aviv knows the power that the perception of political vulnerability offers in negotiations .
When the game @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grasped , that leverage will quickly dissipate as negotiators realize they have long been manipulated .
That makes the duplicity personal .
The key barrier to realization is the fast-fading belief among policy makers in the U.S. and the E.U .
that Israel is an ally and a friend rather than a sophisticated foe skilled at using deception to leverage its small numbers to great effect .
Though collapse is one possible strategy , Bibi may instead be assassinated .
The threads of a plausible storyline were laid in a September 9th article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ French president Charles de Gaulle against whom French nationalists staged numerous assassination attempts .
Either approach would inject enough entropy into the peace process to sustain the Palestinian conflict and extend the occupation yet again .
Either strategy would strengthen the hand of the hate-mongers as settlers build another 19,000 homes and U.S. legislators continue to pretend that the Zionist state is a victim of anti-Semitism rather than a serial agent provocateur .

This 4-part series identifies those who induce us to hate-and describes how.
1. The Hate Mongers Among Us
2. Signs of a Rift with Israel?
3. The Use of Pliable and Reliable Assets to Advance a Narrative
4. Staying on Message to Advance a Narrative
As the “how” of hate mongering becomes transparent, its common source will become apparent. With transparency comes accountability. That’s when you can watch for hate to emerge yet again to shield those who hide behind the toxic charge of “anti-Semitism.”
With the shared knowledge of how hate is evoked and sustained, those provoked to hate can say with confidence “Never Again” to those complicit in inducing this evil.
Timing is Everything
Hate can be personal or geopolitical. Those who induced us to war in the Middle East made it personal. The murderous provocation of 911 was emotionally wrenching and intensely personal. As a people, our gut reaction ensured that support for the war would become widespread.
In the aftermath of that mass murder on U.S. soil, Martin Peretz, editor of The New Republic, summed up the situation: “We are all Israelis now.”
So now we can all be persuaded to hate Muslims-even if we’ve never met one.
The shared mental environment was flooded with what then seemed like plausible justifications for the invasion of Iraq: Iraqi WMD; Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda; Iraqi meetings with Al Qaeda in Prague; Iraqi mobile biological weapons laboratories; Iraqi purchases of yellowcake uranium from Niger.
We now know that all those rationales were fixed around a preset agenda. Yet a critical mass of false beliefs sufficed to take us to war. For those skilled at inducing hate, consensus beliefs need not be true, they need only be credible-and only for a limited time.
With a corrupt consensus ruling the day, anyone offering proof that Iraq was not a threat was dismissed as unpatriotic or soft on terrorism.
This 911-prompted hate fest started with Iraq, a former ally, as a U.S.-led invasion kicked off The Clash of Civilizations. The bravado of “bring ’em on” quickly became “shock and awe” as a vicious invasion was pursued with a relaxed “Aw Shucks” attitude supported with a media campaign comprised of photo ops of a commander-in-chief nonchalantly clearing brush at his home in Crawford, Texas.
Brand America became “We’re still the world’s biggest and baddest in the war-waging business. Just you watch.”
And watch us go broke as America led an Atlantic coalition that, like Israel, alienated much of the Muslim world.
An Invalid War
Plus there’s another strategic problem: our reason for invading Iraq was “invalid.” That’s the assessment of Defense Secretary Robert Gates. He should know. After the invasion, the invalid storyline quickly shifted to “Saddam the Evil Doer” as our rationale.
How can the rationale be invalid? If we’re all Israelis now, surely that entitles us to invade lands belonging to Muslims, kill them, transform them into refugees and, with impunity, create widespread outrage among the broader Muslim population.
Let’s fast-forward to nine years after a high-profile slaughter in Manhattan and survey our success in the stark light of hindsight. Are we more secure? Are we more prosperous? Are Americans facing a brighter future? Are our children proud of the outcome?
Israel has occupied Palestinian land for more than six decades. The September 13th issue of Time magazine captured the Israeli sentiment: “Why Israel Doesn’t Care About Peace.”
Israelis are too busy prospering to care. Outraged Muslims are a nuisance but they’re now largely marginalized and, for the most part, manageable. Is that what happened to us? Have Americans become Israelis?
Not long ago an internal poll of friendly foreign intelligence agencies ranked our best and worst allies-those who behave as friends to the U.S. versus those who are clearly foes. Israel ranked dead last as a reliable ally. Though their brazen theft of technical and industrial secrets is well known among those in the know, the broader U.S. public remains deceived or in denial.
Most Americans still see Israel as an ally. The facts confirm that’s a dangerous delusion.
Meanwhile Mossad agents are recruiting Arab-Americans to spy on their neighbors in the U.S. Though Tel Aviv is called on the carpet three times as often as other nations, Israel still ranks third in the aggressiveness of its U.S. operations, behind only China and Russia.
That ranking may well be out of date with Israel now first in foreign operations on U.S. soil.
Other Telling Signs
Zionist Jews deployed terror and intimidation to occupy Muslim lands long before Harry Truman was induced in 1948 to recognize an extremist enclave as a legitimate nation state. Disputes over land remain at the heart of the expansionist agenda for Greater Israel.
On September 7th, Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas asked that the U.S. settle a dispute over the Israeli expansion of settlements that threaten to derail Mideast peace talks. Those talks have dragged on since 1967. Settling those disputes would disrupt the Zionist agenda.
In a telling rebuke, on September 12th, Tel Aviv rejected a proposed visit to Israel by the foreign ministers of France, Spain, Britain, Germany and Italy. Why? These senior diplomats sought a remedy to that dispute in order to achieve a long-evasive peace.
Therein lies Israel’s strategic strength. Absent this sustained provocation (43 years and counting), hatred might subside and peace may become a possibility. That’s a danger Tel Aviv works hard to avoid.
September 12th also saw the release of a new report indicating that 2,066 new homes would be constructed in the West Bank as soon as the temporary freeze expires September 26th.
Meanwhile back in the U.S., Americans remain unaware of how many contracts for Homeland Security were awarded to Israeli firms or to firms owned by pro-Israelis. Nor do Americans realize how many Homeland Security outlays have been directed to Jewish community centers.
That’s all the more reason for Zionists-both Jewish and Christian-to create an uproar about an Islamic Community Center planned for construction two blocks from the 911 site in Manhattan.
And all the more reason for a Christian-Zionist preacher to designate the ninth anniversary of 911 as “International Burn a Koran Day” at his 50-member church.
The Koran gambit gained global attention, stoked by a media dominated by Jewish Zionists. High profile political personalities ensured that this hate-mongering stunt was kept in the forefront of international news coverage in the lead-up to the anniversary of modern history’s best-known hate-mongering provocation.
Signs of a rift between U.S. politicians and U.S. national security
Even with the media support required to sustain hate in plain sight, today’s background chatter suggests that those worried about U.S. national security are at work in the shadows to counter the influence of the Israel lobby.
If so, that is good news-for the United States.
When Israeli-American writer Jeff Goldberg appeared again in the news, you knew psy-ops were underway. In March 2002, Goldberg published in The New Yorker a lengthy story alleging an alliance between the religious jihadists of Al Qaeda and the secular Baathists of Iraq.
Though a nonsensical premise, his account made such an alliance appear plausible to a public lacking in knowledge of the Middle East. Goldberg’s storyline made it easier for Saddam Hussein to be portrayed as both an Evil Doer and a threat to the U.S.
Goldberg’s collaborator was James Woolsey, a former Director of the CIA and an avid Zionist. Woolsey assured us that Iraqi intelligence officials met in Prague with Al Qaeda. By association, his stature in intelligence lent credibility to phony intelligence fixed around an Israeli agenda.
Goldberg reemerged in July to promote Evil Doer status for Iran. Writing in the July 22nd issue of The Atlantic, he argued the Israeli case for bombing Iran and urged that the U.S. again join the fray. No one in mainstream media mentioned his earlier manipulation.
Based on the consistency of his “journalism,” it came as no surprise to see Goldberg reemerge just in time for the ninth anniversary of 911. Aided by an array of false intelligence reported by a complicit media, that murderous provocation helped persuade the U.S. to invade Iraq to remove Evil Doer Saddam Hussein.
That March 2003 agenda was first promoted in 1996 in A Clean Break, a strategy paper written for Benjamin Netanyahu by an Israeli-American team led by Richard Perle. This Jewish-Zionist operative re-emerged in July 2001 to chair the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board where he was joined by Woolsey and others supportive of this Israeli agenda.
Advancing the Narrative
Fast-forward to September 2010 and we find Goldberg back at work promoting his interview with Fidel Castro. Emerging fact patterns suggest it came as no surprise to our national security apparatus that the theme of this latest well-timed Goldberg article was the Cuban leader’s concern that Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is “anti-Semitic.”
The timing of this report came as a surprise to those aware that Castro has long been critical of Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians.
Goldberg reports he was “summoned” to Havana to discuss Castro’s fears of a global nuclear war. After conceding in the interview that the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis “wasn’t worth it,” Castro turned to a theme of topical importance to Tel Aviv, insisting that the Iranian government must understand that Jews “were expelled from their land, persecuted and mistreated all over the world.”
Knowing Cuba’s pre-revolution alliance with Meyer Lansky and other kingpins in Jewish organized crime, one must wonder if this “journalist” was dispatched to commence negotiations for gambling concessions as a means to fill the Castro government’s depleted coffers.
The recent relaxation of restrictions on travel to Cuba may signal a pending return to Cuba’s “glory days” as a nearby haven for organized crime.
Castro’s well-timed comments about persecuted Jews may have been a signal that Cuba is again open for business-any business. At the very least, his comments were like a healing balm to nationalist Zionist settlers who have plans to construct another 19,000 home in the West Bank.
So much for those who seek to quell Israel’s long-running land dispute with the Palestinians in order to keep peace talks on track.
Within two days of the release of the Goldberg interview, vandals in Sacramento, California used a swastika to deface an image of Israeli basketball star Omri Casspi. The identity of the vandals has not been confirmed.
This much has been confirmed: timing is everything when seeking to sustain a storyline. Casting Castro as pro-Israeli was a stroke of genius.
Here’s where it starts of get interesting as Americans wake up to find themselves unwitting combatants in the first real Information Age War. When waging modern-day warfare in the shared field of consciousness, media is routinely deployed to displace facts with false beliefs.
Thus the need for substantial and sustained influence in that domain by those determined to shape the political narrative. No one does that better than those who induced the world’s greatest super power to wage a war on their behalf.
Recent developments suggest that the dynamics may be shifting in the “field” where political narratives are advanced and where today’s wars are either won or lost. That field is the shared field of consciousness where consensus beliefs are created and sustained.
In news reported from the Middle East on September 10, Washington took a surprising stance in support of Iranian claims that Tehran was not building a new uranium enrichment facility. That statement came after an Iranian dissident group, in a well-timed release, charged that Iran had a new secret nuclear site 120 kilometers north of Tehran.
That disclaimer preempted a lead editorial in The New York Times published in the U.S. later that same day-just before the ninth anniversary of 911. That editorial sought to give credence to a report that had already been dismissed as not credible.
Was this an example of U.S. national security attempting to reclaim the narrative? Does this signal a new aggressiveness by the U.S. in waging field-based warfare against those whose successful deceptions led us to war in the Middle East?
Two days prior, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a speech stating “there may not be another chance” for Mideast peace. That statement came the same day that a senior Palestinian negotiator confirmed they would not recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Clinton said nothing.
Could these developments signal a crack in the Zionist agenda that has shaped U.S. foreign policy for more than six decades? Are Zionists losing their chokehold on the White House?
If so, will the Israel lobby again rally Congress to Israel’s defense?
Will we see another “unbreakable bond” resolution urging that U.S. interests continue to take second place to Tel Aviv’s agenda for the region?
Will the national security interests of the U.S. prevail or will Zionist goals again triumph?
Timing is Everything
While these events were unfolding, The New York Times continued to stoke the controversy surrounding “International Burn A Koran Day.”
The nation’s “newspaper of record” conceded that this well-timed controversy began with local coverage by The Gainesville Sun (owned by The New York Times) when pastor Terry Jones posted a sign outside his small church that read “Islam is of the devil.”
By August 26th, The Times was prepared to publish a major article on Jones and the anti-Islam views of his 50-member congregation. By September 9th, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki was prepared to say with confidence that Zionists were responsible for the Jones plan to burn a Koran on 911.
In a fortuitous case of timing, recordings played in a federal courtroom on September 8th showed how a government informer induced a 2009 synagogue bomb plot in New York. The recordings made it clear that those on trial as “homegrown terrorists bent on jihad” were not even modestly well versed in Islam. To make a plausible case for later use in the courtroom, the informer prompted comments consistent with the hate-mongering motivation at the heart of the prosecution’s case.
Do these small chinks in the Zionist armor suggest that Israeli dominance of U.S. foreign policy may be drawing to a close?
The Use of Pliable and Reliable Assets to Advance a Narrative
Many of America’s most prominent political leaders were induced to comment on “International Burn A Koran Day”-a high profile provocation proposed by a Christian-Zionist preacher with a small congregation in a small town in Florida.
When U.S. General David Petraeus spoke out against the proposal, the issue immediately gained an international profile as did Pastor Terry Jones who quickly became an international celebrity.
One need not dig deep to identify who may have advised General Petraeus to grant a global profile to a provocation consistent with Israeli goals for the region.
In March, as head of Central Command, Petraeus offered testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee confirming facts that have long been obvious but are seldom mentioned: our “special relationship” with Israel and its oppressive occupation of Palestine undermine U.S. interests in the Middle East and endanger American personnel. Read it for yourself:
“The enduring hostilities between Israel and some of its neighbors present distinct challenges to our ability to advance our interests… Israeli-Palestinian tensions often flare into violence and large-scale armed confrontations. The conflict foments anti-American sentiment due to a perception of U.S. favoritism for Israel. Arab anger over the Palestinian question limits the strength and depth of U.S. partnerships with governments and peoples in the [region] and weakens the legitimacy of moderate regimes in the Arab world. Meanwhile, al-Qaeda and other militant groups exploit that anger to mobilize support. The conflict also gives Iran influence in the Arab world through its clients, Lebanese Hizballah and Hamas….”
Petraeus is often spoken of as a potential Republican presidential candidate. Thus the chagrin among some in Washington when this high profile military leader appeared to curry favor with Max Boot, a former Wall Street Journal op-ed editor and outspoken Zionist. In an apparent attempt to soften the candor of his written testimony before the Senate, he wrote to Boot:
“Does it help if folks know that I hosted Elie Wiesel and his wife at our quarters last Sun night?! And that I will be the speaker at?the 65th anniversary of the liberation of the concentration camps in mid-Apr at the Capitol Dome…”
Boot wrote back to assure him that those comments were not necessary as Petraeus had not been described as anti-Semitic. Boot then posted a pro-Petraeus piece on the website for Commentary, a neoconservative publication, assuring readers that the general is not anti-Israel and dismissing his anti-Israel comments as inserted by staff in his statement-that Petraeus reviewed.
The Supporting Cast
After General Petraeus, now senior commander in Afghanistan, created a high profile for the Burn-A-Koran controversy, comments were offered by Attorney General Eric Holder, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama. With that, the provocation went viral.
These fuel-the-fire comments were followed by a personal appeal to Pastor Jones in a phone call from Defense Secretary Robert Gates that also went viral.
As any game theorist could predict, even the possibility of such a psy-ops (a Koran book burning) was guaranteed to galvanize anti-American sentiments and catalyze anti-American demonstrations. As the book burning gained steadily more profile, this provocation increased the probability of catalyzing long-lasting anti-American sentiments.
This stunt bears a remarkable resemblance to a Newsweek story alleging that a U.S. soldier flushed a Koran down the toilet. Though that May 2005 account by Michael Isikoff was later withdrawn in substantial part, its publication provoked an earlier well-timed response by setting off anti-American demonstrations in Muslim countries worldwide.
At first, the story gained only scant attention. That muted response changed dramatically when Pakistani cricket star Imran Khan gave Isikoff’s story an international profile by announcing from Islamabad that American military personnel had desecrated a holy Islamic text.
That’s when this Clash of Civilizations-catalyzing, U.S.-discrediting account went viral. In practical effect, Khan’s celebrity was appropriated to associate the U.S. military with conduct similar in its psy-ops effect to the profile given an American proposing to burn a Koran.
Newsweek was recently acquired by Sidney Harman, the husband of California Congresswoman Jane Harman, the Jewish Zionist chair of the Intelligence Subcommittee of the House Committee on Homeland Security. At the time of this provocation, Newsweek was a magazine affiliate of The Washington Post newspaper, an influential opinion-shaping newspaper based in the nation’s capital.
In the annals of “field-based warfare,” the Koran-flushing story will go down in history as a classic psy-ops for its success in targeting the minds of a built-in audience outside the U.S.-cricket fans-as a vulnerable and receptive shared field of consciousness.
When the high-profile Imran Khan described the alleged incident as factual, this operation transcended the literacy barrier as it provoked Muslims who did not even need to read in order to be reached-and provoked.
And because the story targeted cricket fans, its impact was disastrous to Americans while also remaining invisible to America where cricket is neither a well known activity nor a widely played sport.
In what passes for mainstream American media, the Isikoff story was called news. In national security parlance, the well-timed launch of that provocative storyline is called tactical psy-ops. So far, the Koran-burning story is being attributed solely to the whims of a southern preacher.
Stay tuned. It may be only a coincidence that Jones was a high school classmate of Rush Limbaugh, America’s most provocative radio talk show host.
Information Age Warfare
If this sounds familiar, it should. You may recall when the wartime role played by global media became apparent in the Clash-catalyzing “cartoon riots” that swept the world in February 2006. That reaction followed the publication in France, Germany, Italy and Spain of graphic images of the prophet Muhammad that first appeared in a Danish newspaper in September 2005.
Citing free speech as the rationale, cultural editor Flemming Rose published a compilation of cartoons certain to be seen by Muslims as blasphemous, including one featuring Muhammad with a bomb in place of a turban.
An Ashkenazi native of Ukraine, Rose worked as a reporter for five years in Moscow during the oligarchi-zation of Russia. As his contribution to that nationwide fraud, he translated into Danish a fawning 1990 autobiography (Against the Stream) of presidential candidate Boris Yeltsin whose administration enabled the wildly successful financial pillaging of Russia.
Six of the top seven Russian oligarchs were Ashkenazim who qualified for Israeli citizenship.
Rose’s career tracks the trajectory of a typical media asset. After Russia, he relocated to Washington, D.C. Again employed as a journalist, he traveled to China with Bill Clinton before returning to Moscow to work for Jyllands-Posten, a rightwing Danish publication known for its anti-immigrant news fare.
Before catalyzing the cartoon crisis, Rose published a flattering interview with the Islam-bashing Daniel Pipes who heads Campus Watch. This organization monitors, disrupts and seeks to intimidate pro-Palestinian speakers when they accept invitations to speak at U.S. colleges.
Pipes is the neoconservative, Jewish-Zionist son of “Team B” leader Richard Pipes a Polish emigre. Team B was a 1976 alternative intelligence assessment whose success with phony intelligence during the presidency of Gerald Ford (when G.H.W. Bush was C.I.A. Director) informed those who fixed the intelligence that enabled the U.S. to segue seamlessly from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism during the presidency of G.W. Bush.
After the promotion of Rose to cultural editor and publication of the provocative cartoons, CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer featured Pipes on The Situation Room. By showcasing Pipes, Blitzer ensured the airwaves would carry his anti-Islam interpretation of the Rose-catalyzed, media-fueled crisis.
Blitzer elected not to inform the viewers of CNN (“the most trusted name in news”) that he (Blitzer) served as an editor of Near East Report, the Israel lobby’s in-house journal, or that he spent 17 years with The Jerusalem Post, or that he published a sympathetic book on Israeli super-spy Jonathan Pollard who did more than anyone in history to damage U.S. national security.
The ensuing crisis cost many lives while the reaction to that provocation consumed the public’s attention and polarized public opinion internationally. Appearing on television, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice used the crisis to criticize Iran and Syria, adding American credibility and military authority to stoke The Clash of Civilizations as the post-Cold War narrative.
Overall, the response heightened tensions and made an attack on Iran appear more reasonable as scenes of widespread outrage by Muslims fueled Islamo-phobia in the West. To escape the media scrutiny, Rose fled to the U.S. where he vacationed in Miami.
Timing is Everything
The usual suspects stepped into the fray in support of Pastor Terry Jones’ First Amendment right to further outrage an already outraged Muslim population for whom the Koran is a sacred text.
Supporting cast for the Jones stunt included New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg who chose an annual Iftar dinner at Gracie Mansion to cite the U.S. Constitution in support of this provocation. Likewise for New York Times columnist Charles Blow whose prominently placed op-ed on September 11th urged that “great American debates” should not be “tempered for terrorists.”
National security may (at long last) be catching on to how those complicit in these psy-ops use our guaranteed freedoms (of speech, press, religion, etc.) to undermine our freedom. It’s no coincidence that those most concerned about domestic eavesdropping by national security are drawn from the same ranks as those complicit in this ongoing manipulation of public opinion.
The high profile nature of this latest 911 anniversary ensured that agent provocateurs would use the event to keep hate alive. The day prior, President Obama urged that Israel extend its “temporary partial freeze” on settlements for the sake of sustaining the peace talks.
Meanwhile Jewish Zionist Pamela Geller sponsored a speech at Ground Zero by Dutch politician Geert Wilders who likens the Koran to Mein Kampf. A staunch supporter of Israel, Wilders is known for his incendiary speeches with a strong anti-Islam theme.
Geller, a disciple of Russian philosopher Ayn Rand (Alisa Rosenbaum), advocates measures to “Stop Islamization of America.” She emphasizes the role of Barack Obama in doing the bidding of “Islamic overlords” in what she calls “The Obama Administration’s War on America.”
An outspoken Jewish Zionist, Geller urges that Israel “give up nothing.” A regular commentator on Zionist-dominated media outlets (CNN, Fox News, The Washington Post, The New York Times), she insists that Israel should “take back Gaza” and “secure Judea and Samaria”-better known as the West Bank, the key area of contention on expansion of the settlements.
Geller is also a driving force behind anti-Islam hate groups working to scuttle plans for an Islamic Cultural Center two blocks from the 911 site. Allied with others in the hate campaign, she was among the first in November 2009 to describe the shootings on Fort Hood, Texas as a “Muslim terror attack.”
Staying on message to advance the narrative
Keeping the “anti-Semitism” theme front-and-center remains essential to advance the hate-monger’s narrative with the assistance of mainstream media.
Thus the Anti-Defamation League criticized the current cover of Time magazine for what ADL President Abe Foxman suggested was a portrayal of Israelis as more interested in making money than in striking a peace accord with the Palestinians.
The article highlighted Israel’s booming real estate market and the pleasure Israelis are taking in late-Summer vacations.
Nevertheless, according to Foxman: “The insidious subtext of Israeli Jews being obsessed with money echoes the age-old anti-Semitic falsehood that Jews care about money above any other interest, in this case achieving peace with the Palestinians.”
Foxman insisted that Managing Editor Richard Stengel issue an apology to readers both for the timing of the article and for calling up old anti-Semitic stereotypes about Jews and money.
As if right on cue, the next day filmmaker Michael Moore jumped into the Islamic Cultural Center debate, arguing that the center should not be near the 911 site but inside it as a way for Muslims to recover their religion from Islamic extremists.
In his branded controversial style, Moore could have left it at that. Instead, he used his assured media profile to relate an account of George Washington’s wish to see Jews receive equal rights.
Impressionistic Warfare
From a psy-ops perspective, the subject matter is secondary to the impressions left with the public. The imbedding of imagery and emotion is the strategic purpose of much of what you see.
For instance, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, speaking to ABC’s “This Week,” said on September 12th that the controversy over the site of an Islamic Cultural Center has heightened concerns among Muslims of rising anti-Muslim sentiment, saying he felt there was “growing Islamophobia in this country.”
That’s a foreseeable result of creating widely shared impressions that foster and sustain widely shared beliefs that, in turn, are kept intact with emotional triggers. That’s how the hate-monger narrative progresses in plain sight.
When waging war in the shared field of consciousness, the most powerful weapon is often the power of association. Michael Moore’s film success shows how it’s done.
In his popular Fahrenheit 911, he deployed impressionistic “weaponry” to associate the war in Iraq with “Bush Oil.” How was that done? He showed on film that one of the several dozen siblings of Osama bin Laden served on the board of advisers to the Carlyle Group, an investment banking firm in Washington, D.C.
Also serving on that board was former president George H.W. Bush, the father of George W. Bush. Therefore, by the power of association, the war in Iraq was for “Bush Oil.” Storylines don’t need to true, just plausible. The point of psy-ops is not reality but credibility.
Impressions gain the traction required to advance a storyline-in plain sight.
Consensus beliefs create and sustain a narrative-in plain sight.
Psy-ops succeed when they attract enough eyeballs to misdirect the public’s attention-in plain sight.
Fahrenheit 911 was produced by Miramax, a Disney subsidiary. Miramax co-chairman Harvey Weinstein loudly claimed that Disney reneged on its promise to distribute Moore’s film. Disney chief executive Michael Eisner objected-just as loudly.
The high profile sparing between these two Hollywood titans dragged on for months in mainstream media. By the time the film was released, the interest generated by this “dispute” ensured that Moore’s film opened on a record number of screens for a “documentary.”
At virtually no cost, that public relations ploy helped ensure an international audience for a film that discredited not only the U.S. but also the office of the president. In its practical effect, the Moore film helped ensure there was virtually no mention of how key Zionist goals were advanced by this war-in plain sight.
Real-time Terror
Meanwhile, September 12th news reports highlighted the extradition to France from Egypt of a terrorist who reportedly planned to bomb an Israel Defense Forces event in Paris. Noticeably absent were facts about the timeframe of this threat or even when the arrest was made.
That account provided an opportunity for the chief of French intelligence to make a high profile announcement that the risk of a terrorist attack on France “has never been higher.” This week, the French Senate is scheduled to vote a ban on wearing Islamic veils known as burgas, a vote certain to reinforce The Clash of Civilizations as the consensus narrative
Also on September 12th, the leader of Shin Bet announced in Tel Aviv: “Hamas forces in Gaza and the West Bank are engaged in an effort to foil peace talks.” Israel’s domestic security chief told cabinet ministers “threats are due to increase in the near future, as diplomatic developments occur…This isn’t just an estimate but is supported by real intelligence.”
Unmentioned in this volatile mix is the psychology of the hate monger. The purveyors of hate routinely project onto their opponents both their own personality traits (hatred) and, as here, their anticipated agenda. This announcement is far more likely to mean that Shin Bet will stage provocations designed to make it appear that Hamas is the instigator of violence.
For the Zionist agenda to continue in plain sight, peace must be avoided no matter what the cost. Disruption of the peace process, in turn, must plausibly be the work of others. The hate monger must appear to be hated; the aggressor must plausibly appear to be the victim.
Thus the need to portray as anti-Semitic (a hater) those who document the dynamics of how hate-mongers induce hate-in plain sight.
The Assassination of Bibi Netanyahu
Should we see a revival of the U.S. national security apparatus, we will also see a push back against the right-wing extremist coalitions that have long ruled Israel. However, any resistance to the Zionist agenda runs the risk that Israel’s masters of game theory warfare will collapse another government.
That’s how Tel Aviv responded when in June 1963, President John F. Kennedy pressured David Ben-Gurion for inspections of Israel’s nuclear facility at Dimona. This young president sought to ensure that the Zionists of that era did not start a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. He foresaw what we now see.
Before JFK’s strongly worded letter could be physically delivered, Ben-Gurion resigned citing undisclosed personal reasons. By the time a replacement governing coalition was in place and fully functional, the Kennedy problem had been handled.
In the parlance of national security, that’s called an entropy strategy.
Fast-emerging circumstances suggest the likelihood of a similar strategy, particularly should there emerge any prospect of peace with the Palestinians. As Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman candidly put it, peace is impossible: “not next year and not for the next generation.”
Should “Bibi” pressure his fragile governing coalition for an extension of the “temporary partial freeze” on settlements, members of his nationalist government could withdraw, collapsing the government. Key members of the coalition signaled their intentions on September 12th by announcing that any extension of the freeze will end the Netanyahu government.
On September 13th, four Likud Party members threatened to withdraw budget support if the freeze is extended. That threat was issued as Netanyahu departed for peace talks in Sharm el-Sheikh with Palestinian leaders and U.S. Secretary of State Clinton.
The recurring possibility of governmental collapse has long given Tel Aviv leverage over peace talks sought by the U.S. That era may soon draw to a close if our national security apparatus is now guiding U.S. foreign policy. To date, our elected officials have proven themselves unable to navigate through the manipulations often deployed by Israel to stymie agreement on the terms of a peace accord.
Tel Aviv knows the power that the perception of political vulnerability offers in negotiations. When the game theory dynamics of Israeli psy-ops are fully grasped, that leverage will quickly dissipate as negotiators realize they have long been manipulated. That makes the duplicity personal.
The key barrier to realization is the fast-fading belief among policy makers in the U.S. and the E.U. that Israel is an ally and a friend rather than a sophisticated foe skilled at using deception to leverage its small numbers to great effect.
Though collapse is one possible strategy, Bibi may instead be assassinated.
The threads of a plausible storyline were laid in a September 9th article on Haaretz.com where he was compared to French president Charles de Gaulle against whom French nationalists staged numerous assassination attempts.
Either approach would inject enough entropy into the peace process to sustain the Palestinian conflict and extend the occupation yet again.
Either strategy would strengthen the hand of the hate-mongers as settlers build another 19,000 homes and U.S. legislators continue to pretend that the Zionist state is a victim of anti-Semitism rather than a serial agent provocateur.


veteranstoday--2020-07-24--DOJ to investigate Trump’s fake police for Portland violence and excessive force

In response to Congressional requests , complaints received by the OIG , and a referral from the U.S. Attorney in Oregon , the DOJ Office of the Inspector General ( OIG ) has opened an investigation into use of force allegations involving DOJ law enforcement personnel in Portland , Oregon in July 2020 .
The DOJ OIG will coordinate our investigation with the Department of Homeland Security OIG .
In addition , in response to requests from Members of Congress and members of the public , the DOJ OIG is initiating a review to examine the DOJ ’ s and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ responsibilities in responding to protest activity and civil unrest in Washington , DC , and in Portland , Oregon over the prior two months .
The review will include examining the training and instruction that was provided to the DOJ law enforcement personnel ; compliance with applicable identification requirements , rules of engagement , and legal authorities ; and adherence to DOJ policies regarding the use of less-lethal munitions , chemical agents , and other uses of force .
With regard to events in Lafayette Square on June 1 , 2020 , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Department of Interior OIG , which recently announced its review of those events .
If circumstances warrant , the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review .

Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz announced today that:
In response to Congressional requests, complaints received by the OIG, and a referral from the U.S. Attorney in Oregon, the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has opened an investigation into use of force allegations involving DOJ law enforcement personnel in Portland, Oregon in July 2020. The DOJ OIG will coordinate our investigation with the Department of Homeland Security OIG.
In addition, in response to requests from Members of Congress and members of the public, the DOJ OIG is initiating a review to examine the DOJ’s and its law enforcement components’ roles and responsibilities in responding to protest activity and civil unrest in Washington, DC, and in Portland, Oregon over the prior two months.
The review will include examining the training and instruction that was provided to the DOJ law enforcement personnel; compliance with applicable identification requirements, rules of engagement, and legal authorities; and adherence to DOJ policies regarding the use of less-lethal munitions, chemical agents, and other uses of force.
With regard to events in Lafayette Square on June 1, 2020, the DOJ OIG will coordinate our review with the Department of Interior OIG, which recently announced its review of those events. If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review.