veteranstoday--2020-04-17--From COP-21 to COVID-19: The Collapse of ‘Predictive Models’ and the Return to Actual Thinking

American Surgeon General Jerome Powell ’ s recent announcement that America would begin using real data and real trends instead of the World Health Organization-Bill Gates driven ‘ predictive models ’ came as a breath of fresh air for many who were beginning to lose hope that reason had been banished from world policy .
When compared with reality , the WHO/Gates-funded narrative justifying the total shutdown of global economies falls apart like a house of cards as outlined perfectly by the Swiss Propaganda Research Institute ’ s Facts of COVID-19 .
Powell ’ s announcement opens up a larger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mind , and how the oligarchy has managed to subvert nation-states over the past 50 years using a simple technique that replaces actual creative thinking for mind-less computer modeling .
The Global Coup : Predictive Models Take Over Actual Thinking The age of “ predictive doomsday models ” in many ways grew out of the 1972 Limits to Growth study funded by the Club of Rome which popularized the technique of tying temperature increases to carbon dioxide and projecting economic variables like population , resource losses , and “ pollution growth ” into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hell out of their incredulous victims and intimidate nations to drastically modify their collective behavior .
This use of skewed , under-defined statistics , projected into the future in order to “ act preventatively on future crises ” became a hegemonic practice for the next 40 years and has been used by neo-Malthusians consistently to justify the increased rates of war , poverty , and disease across the world .
Paul Ehrlich ’ s influential 1968 book the Population Bomb used similar models to cast trends of geometric population growth into the future @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of unimaginable proportions as oil would dry up , arable lands dry away and resources disappear by the year 2000 .
In 1968 his book , Ehrlich stated his misanthropic view in the following words : “ A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells ; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people .
.
.
.
We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of cancer .
The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.
” Ehrlich ’ s protégé John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shutdown of NASA ` s manned space systems and fusion program as Obama ` s science Czar went further when he wrote on p.942 in his 1977 book Ecoscience : “ Perhaps those agencies , combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies , might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime- sort of an international superagency for population , resources , and environment .
Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development , administration , conservation , and distribution of all natural resources , renewable or nonrenewable , at least @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans , but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans .
The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade , perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs , and including all food on the international market .
The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government , but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.
” Under this heartless logic , nation-states simply had to be converted into tools for imposing depopulation programs rather than naively endeavoring to end colonialism , poverty and war as foolish statesmen like John Kennedy , Bobby Kennedy , Enrico Mattei or Martin Luther King attempted .
Kissinger ’ s National Security Study Memorandum 200 ( 1974 ) outlined this new objective for America stating : “ Assistance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the largest and fastest-growing developing countries where there are a special US and strategic interest ” .
Among those developing nations targetted for population reduction , NSSM-200 listed birth control and the withholding of food as primary tools .
Kissinger coldly wrote : “ is the US prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can ’ t/won ’ t control their population growth ?
” Throughout the 1970s , the Trilateral Commission/Council on Foreign Relations cabal under the direction of Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski completely took over American foreign policy and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Commission member Paul Volcker called “ the controlled disintegration of the economy ” .
Upon attaining chairmanship of the Federal Reserve in 1979 , Volcker put this policy to work by raising interest rates to 20 % and kept them there for another two years- destroying America ’ s small and medium agro-industries while leaving only a highly cartelized corporate behemoth capable of surviving such draconian rates .
Real growth plummeted , long term planning was forgotten and deregulation ushered in vast speculation which replaced the formerly dirigiste capitalism that made the west @ @ @ @ @ @ @ technological progress were shut down .
Fusion energy research was systematically destroyed as fast as the space program .
Infrastructure investments dried up and America ’ s age of nuclear power construction was shut down .
In true Pygmalion fashion , the oligarchy was able to “ scientifically justify ” their misanthropic view of global governance by first breaking humanity ’ s knee caps and then arguing that we were never meant to run .
In today ’ s language , this practice of ‘ predictive modeling ’ is reflected in the central @ @ @ @ @ @ @ calls for a new financial system to promote a decarbonized society by 2050 since ‘ predictive models ’ state that the world will heat 1.5 degrees according to a presumed connection to carbon dioxide emissions which can only be corrected if we monetize carbon and put a profit on shutting down human industrial activity .
As it turns out , when compared to the real data , not only does one quickly find that the post 1977 warming trend ended in 1999 , but the actual temperature falls well below all computer projections @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to environmental policy what the WHO is to health policy ) .
This hysterical prediction is also seen in Prince Charles ’ recent warning that the world has 18 months to save itself before ‘ predictive modeling ’ says that global warming becomes unstoppable and the earth burns in a dystopic inferno !
Charles is the son of the same Prince Philip who infamously gushed over his wish to be reincarnated as a deadly virus “ in order to solve overpopulation ” making it more than a bit ironic that Charles announced his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In a 1988 interview with Deutsche Press Agentur , Prince Philip said : “ The more people there are , the more resources they ’ ll consume , the more pollution they ’ ll create , the more fighting they will do .
We have no option .
If it isn ’ t controlled voluntarily , it will be controlled involuntarily by an increase in disease , starvation , and war .
…In the event that I am reincarnated , I would like to return as a deadly virus , in order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should not make the mistake of separating Philip ’ s misanthropic statements with his active role in co-founding the global ecology movement alongside Bilderberg group founder Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands .
This includes their joint role as co-founders of the World Wildlife Club in 1961 , their founding of the 1001 Nature Trust in 1970 or their joint management and funding of global climate science throughout the 20th century .
As I outlined in my 2019 lecture , it was this organization that was caught red-handed organizing the murder and coverup of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Philip ’ s powerful lackey Maurice Strong ( who served as WWF vice-president under Philip from 1976-78 ) , let the cat out of the bag in a 1990 interview saying : “ What if a small group of world leaders was to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries ?
And if the world is to survive , those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment .
Will they do it ?
The group ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rich countries won ’ t do it .
They won ’ t change .
So , in order to save the planet , the group decides : Isn ’ t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse ?
Isn ’ t it our responsibility to bring that about ?
” [ 1 ] This is exactly what Carney and his fellow central banking ideologues are talking about when they speak of “ Green New Deals “ .
The Failure of the Collective Green Suicide Pact After five decades of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has had to conclude that this whole plan hasn ’ t really worked out too well .
Many nations were more than a little reticent to shut down the basis of their existence just because some Malthusian technocrats said their computer models required it to be so .
Many inquiring minds noticed that those same computer models never proved in the first place that carbon dioxide actually causes temperature changes and others noticed that in long waves of history , carbon dioxide actually follows temperature changes… implying that the true causes of climate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and more to do with astrophysical effects like the sun and cosmic radiation ( which recent studies by Professor Svensmark have proved seeds clouds and plays a much more direct role in shaping climate change than statisticians wish to admit ) .
Others were bothered by the fact that linear computer projections fail to take into account such non-linear processes as human creative reason and morality which allows mankind the freedom to leap beyond our “ limits to growth ” through the discovery of new principles in the universe and the application of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ form of constant leaps in scientific and technological progress .
Try as they might , linear models can not map non-linearity ( except in the form of logarithms that seek chaotic randomness in the form of a Jackson Pollack painting ) , but not real creative DIRECTED progress .
What made this “ Controlled disintegration agenda ” additionally frustrating was the rise of China ’ s Belt and Road Initiative which demonstrated what REAL nation states can accomplish when they want to get rid of pollution , raise their populations out of poverty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same time [ 1 ] .
In total opposition to the doomsday ‘ predictive models ’ , China has lifted 800 million people out of poverty by forcing the monetary system to obey human needs rather than conforming to the statistical models used by the World Bank or IMF .
China , Russia and other nations working within the BRI Framework have transformed the definition of “ green ” in recent years by investing massively into carbon-free energy like 3rd and 4th generation nuclear power , fusion research , hydroelectricity and greening deserts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recently announced a surprising 10 % increase of global biomass due entirely to China and India ’ s development strategies which not only bring water into deserts but also produce carbon dioxide which plants and trees actually treat as… FOOD !
Then Trump got elected and the Malthusian de-carbonization goals collapsed even further as an America long held under the control of a deep state changed its character and in so doing , revived both a lost sense of nationalism while also rejecting green suicide under a technocratic global dictatorship .
So something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ computer modeling doomsday scenarios are not hard to come by for British intelligence assets working through London ’ s Imperial College and Bank of England who settled on a new strategy… if only a virus could be blown into global pandemic proportions through a systemic skewing of data and centralized control of data management through the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Policy at Johns Hopkin and World Health Organization… then perhaps nations will finally learn how to shut down their economies .
After COVID-19 was announced as a global pandemic by the World @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at London ’ s Imperial College wasted no time in using the same predictive modeling techniques that failed so miserably on climate catastrophe projections to begin forecasting end times scenarios for the coronavirus outbreak .
March 17 models projected over 500 000 UK deaths and 2.2 million American deaths over the coming months .
These numbers were quickly taken up by the WHO and spread across international media to justify the study ’ s “ remedy ” of a full “ shut down of major aspects of society for over a year.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adjusted to predict only 20 000 UK deaths and 100 000 US deaths a week later , the calls to keep the world economy shut down for 12-18 months continued by Dr. Cauci , Gates , Soros and leading experts from the WHO , some of whom were caught on camera advocating breaking into homes to separate family members who have COVID .
For those paying attention , Michael Bloomberg isn ’ t only a famous billionaire corporatist who paid $ 500 million to get his ass kicked on public television , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bosom buddy who acted as United Nations Special Envoy for Climate Change from 2018-2019 until Carney took over the position .
Bloomberg also chairs Carney ’ s Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures which is a keystone piece of the new green cathedral of anti-growth economics which will punish all “ climate offending ” companies by cutting them from credit while rewarding “ green zero-carbon ” companies which accelerate human population collapse .
Bloomberg ’ s School of Public Health just so happened to co-sponsor the October 19 , 2019 , Global Pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ & Melinda Gates Foundation , and World Economic Forum which ran computer simulations under the theme of a novel coronavirus pandemic killing 60 million people .
Over the years while taking over economic , foreign policy and environmental policies of formerly industrial advanced nations of the western alliance , the neo-Malthusian movement also took over medical research through a gradual co-opting of funding of the World Health Organization by private foundations which have increasingly replaced the role of the nation over the past 4 decades .
Today the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WTO ( taking the top spot with Trump ’ s recent announcement of America ’ s exit from it ’ s supporting role ) .
With their interests so intertwined with Big Pharma , and the Five Eyes intelligence agencies , medical practice and medical policy have been put firmly under the control of an elite cadre of “ scientific experts ” who play God with the human race in ivory towers “ untouched by politics ” beholden only to the cold hard numbers of ‘ predictive models ’ .
Both Gates and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ billionaires who run “ The Giving Pledge ” – which is a foundation made up of “ good ” plutocrats who pledged to donate half their wealth to charities .
What are billions after all , when you know the system you parasitically exploited is designed to collapse ?
As Carney stated last year , those “ that anticipate these developments will be rewarded handsomely ; those that fail to adapt will cease to exist.
” Those industrial interests whom Carney threatened in his speech include those “ dirty ” ( see “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ generally unhappy about the idea of being sacrificed on the altar of Gaia and would rather join China ’ s multi-trillion dollar Belt and Road Initiative , as the crisis continues to move closer to the inevitable collapse of the $ 1.2 quadrillion bubble economy .
As this future collapse point accelerates towards the present , the oligarchy knows that nations enmeshed in the west ’ s monetarist net will gladly jump into the Multipolar Alliance as an alternative to their total destruction if for no other reason .
The Multi-Polar Alliance Re-asserts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Computer Modelling The beauty of the new Multipolar Alliance guided by the associated Belt and Road Initiative Framework is this new system ’ s reliance upon the non-linearity of human creative thought .
By defining future states of humanity not as a crisis caused by human cancer cells killing Gaia , the new system approaches the future from the standpoint of creative change .
By investing in space exploration , asteroid defense , lunar mining , fusion and fission development , and large scale infrastructure the Multipolar Alliance is bringing mankind back into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and technological progress within creation .
Speaking to the CPC central committee in 2016 , President Xi said : “ Coordinated development is the unity of balanced development and imbalanced development .
The process from balance to imbalance and then to rebalance is the basic law of development .
Balance is relative while imbalance is absolute .
Emphasizing coordinated development is not pursuing equalitarianism , but giving more importance to equal opportunities and balanced resource allocation.
” In an earlier speech , Xi developed this concept even further : “ We must consider @ @ @ @ @ @ @ growth and the core in this whole undertaking , and human resources as the primary source to support development .
We should promote innovation in theory , systems , science and technology , and culture , and make innovation the dominant theme in the work of the Party , and government , and everyday activity in society… In the 16th century , human society entered an unprecedented period of active innovation .
Achievements in scientific innovation over the past five centuries have exceeded the sum total of several previous millennia .
.
.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ revolution has profoundly changed the outlook and pattern of world development .
.
.
.
Since the second Industrial Revolution , the U.S. has maintained global hegemony because it has always been the leader and the largest beneficiary of scientific and industrial progress.
” In a 2019 speech calling for Russia ’ s prioritization of fusion power as a replacement to the fossil fuel economy , President Putin expressed similar insights saying : “ It may seem strange at first , but fusion energy , which in fact is similar to how heat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in the Sun , is an example of such nature-like technologies .
“ Potentially we can harness a colossal , inexhaustible and safe source of energy .
However , we will only succeed in fusion energy and in solving other fundamental tasks if we establish broad international cooperation and interaction between government and business , and join the efforts of researchers representing different scientific schools and areas .
If technological development becomes truly global , it will not be split up or reined in by attempts to monopolize progress , limit access @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the free exchange of knowledge and ideas… With their help , scientists will be able to literally see nature ’ s creative processes.
” So when Putin or Xi come out calling for a new economic order to replace the currently collapsing one , this is the spirit of the system he is talking about .
They are talking about a system that rejects ‘ predictive modeling ’ using linear equations in favor of the REALITY of human creative mentation as a non-linear YET intelligible geological force of change bringing humanity into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ creation .

American Surgeon General Jerome Powell’s recent announcement that America would begin using real data and real trends instead of the World Health Organization-Bill Gates driven ‘predictive models’ came as a breath of fresh air for many who were beginning to lose hope that reason had been banished from world policy.
When compared with reality, the WHO/Gates-funded narrative justifying the total shutdown of global economies falls apart like a house of cards as outlined perfectly by the Swiss Propaganda Research Institute’s Facts of COVID-19.
Powell’s announcement opens up a larger discussion on the nature of the human mind, and how the oligarchy has managed to subvert nation-states over the past 50 years using a simple technique that replaces actual creative thinking for mind-less computer modeling.
The Global Coup: Predictive Models Take Over Actual Thinking
The age of “predictive doomsday models” in many ways grew out of the 1972 Limits to Growth study funded by the Club of Rome which popularized the technique of tying temperature increases to carbon dioxide and projecting economic variables like population, resource losses, and “pollution growth” into the future in order to scare the hell out of their incredulous victims and intimidate nations to drastically modify their collective behavior.
This use of skewed, under-defined statistics, projected into the future in order to “act preventatively on future crises” became a hegemonic practice for the next 40 years and has been used by neo-Malthusians consistently to justify the increased rates of war, poverty, and disease across the world. Paul Ehrlich’s influential 1968 book the Population Bomb used similar models to cast trends of geometric population growth into the future which would result in a global crisis of unimaginable proportions as oil would dry up, arable lands dry away and resources disappear by the year 2000.
In 1968 his book, Ehrlich stated his misanthropic view in the following words:
“A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. . . . We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.”
Ehrlich’s protégé John Holdren, who led in the shutdown of NASA`s manned space systems and fusion program as Obama`s science Czar went further when he wrote on p.942 in his 1977 book Ecoscience:
“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime- sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market. The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
Under this heartless logic, nation-states simply had to be converted into tools for imposing depopulation programs rather than naively endeavoring to end colonialism, poverty and war as foolish statesmen like John Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Enrico Mattei or Martin Luther King attempted.
Kissinger’s National Security Study Memorandum 200 (1974) outlined this new objective for America stating: “Assistance for population moderation should give emphasis to the largest and fastest-growing developing countries where there are a special US and strategic interest”. Among those developing nations targetted for population reduction, NSSM-200 listed birth control and the withholding of food as primary tools. Kissinger coldly wrote: “is the US prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth?”
Throughout the 1970s, the Trilateral Commission/Council on Foreign Relations cabal under the direction of Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski completely took over American foreign policy and launched a new economic program which Trilateral Commission member Paul Volcker called “the controlled disintegration of the economy”.
Upon attaining chairmanship of the Federal Reserve in 1979, Volcker put this policy to work by raising interest rates to 20% and kept them there for another two years- destroying America’s small and medium agro-industries while leaving only a highly cartelized corporate behemoth capable of surviving such draconian rates. Real growth plummeted, long term planning was forgotten and deregulation ushered in vast speculation which replaced the formerly dirigiste capitalism that made the west great.
All investments into scientific and technological progress were shut down. Fusion energy research was systematically destroyed as fast as the space program. Infrastructure investments dried up and America’s age of nuclear power construction was shut down.
In true Pygmalion fashion, the oligarchy was able to “scientifically justify” their misanthropic view of global governance by first breaking humanity’s knee caps and then arguing that we were never meant to run.
In today’s language, this practice of ‘predictive modeling’ is reflected in the central banking high priest Mark Carney’s calls for a new financial system to promote a decarbonized society by 2050 since ‘predictive models’ state that the world will heat 1.5 degrees according to a presumed connection to carbon dioxide emissions which can only be corrected if we monetize carbon and put a profit on shutting down human industrial activity.
As it turns out, when compared to the real data, not only does one quickly find that the post 1977 warming trend ended in 1999, but the actual temperature falls well below all computer projections produced by the IPCC (which is to environmental policy what the WHO is to health policy).
This hysterical prediction is also seen in Prince Charles’ recent warning that the world has 18 months to save itself before ‘predictive modeling’ says that global warming becomes unstoppable and the earth burns in a dystopic inferno!
Charles is the son of the same Prince Philip who infamously gushed over his wish to be reincarnated as a deadly virus “in order to solve overpopulation” making it more than a bit ironic that Charles announced his contraction of COVID-19 on March 25. In a 1988 interview with Deutsche Press Agentur, Prince Philip said:
“The more people there are, the more resources they’ll consume, the more pollution they’ll create, the more fighting they will do. We have no option. If it isn’t controlled voluntarily, it will be controlled involuntarily by an increase in disease, starvation, and war. …In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
One should not make the mistake of separating Philip’s misanthropic statements with his active role in co-founding the global ecology movement alongside Bilderberg group founder Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands.
This includes their joint role as co-founders of the World Wildlife Club in 1961, their founding of the 1001 Nature Trust in 1970 or their joint management and funding of global climate science throughout the 20th century. As I outlined in my 2019 lecture, it was this organization that was caught red-handed organizing the murder and coverup of John F. Kennedy.
Prince Bernhard and Philip’s powerful lackey Maurice Strong (who served as WWF vice-president under Philip from 1976-78), let the cat out of the bag in a 1990 interview saying:
“What if a small group of world leaders was to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” [1]
This is exactly what Carney and his fellow central banking ideologues are talking about when they speak of “Green New Deals“.
The Failure of the Collective Green Suicide Pact
After five decades of tireless panic and propaganda, the oligarchy has had to conclude that this whole plan hasn’t really worked out too well. Many nations were more than a little reticent to shut down the basis of their existence just because some Malthusian technocrats said their computer models required it to be so.
Many inquiring minds noticed that those same computer models never proved in the first place that carbon dioxide actually causes temperature changes and others noticed that in long waves of history, carbon dioxide actually follows temperature changes… implying that the true causes of climate change have less to do with CO2 and more to do with astrophysical effects like the sun and cosmic radiation (which recent studies by Professor Svensmark have proved seeds clouds and plays a much more direct role in shaping climate change than statisticians wish to admit).
Others were bothered by the fact that linear computer projections fail to take into account such non-linear processes as human creative reason and morality which allows mankind the freedom to leap beyond our “limits to growth” through the discovery of new principles in the universe and the application of those discoveries to the economy in the form of constant leaps in scientific and technological progress. Try as they might, linear models cannot map non-linearity (except in the form of logarithms that seek chaotic randomness in the form of a Jackson Pollack painting), but not real creative DIRECTED progress.
What made this “Controlled disintegration agenda” additionally frustrating was the rise of China’s Belt and Road Initiative which demonstrated what REAL nation states can accomplish when they want to get rid of pollution, raise their populations out of poverty and “go green” at the same time [1].
In total opposition to the doomsday ‘predictive models’, China has lifted 800 million people out of poverty by forcing the monetary system to obey human needs rather than conforming to the statistical models used by the World Bank or IMF. China, Russia and other nations working within the BRI Framework have transformed the definition of “green” in recent years by investing massively into carbon-free energy like 3rd and 4th generation nuclear power, fusion research, hydroelectricity and greening deserts. On this last point, NASA recently announced a surprising 10% increase of global biomass due entirely to China and India’s development strategies which not only bring water into deserts but also produce carbon dioxide which plants and trees actually treat as… FOOD!
Then Trump got elected and the Malthusian de-carbonization goals collapsed even further as an America long held under the control of a deep state changed its character and in so doing, revived both a lost sense of nationalism while also rejecting green suicide under a technocratic global dictatorship.
So something new had to happen.
New Lipstick. Same Pig.
Luckily, computer modeling doomsday scenarios are not hard to come by for British intelligence assets working through London’s Imperial College and Bank of England who settled on a new strategy… if only a virus could be blown into global pandemic proportions through a systemic skewing of data and centralized control of data management through the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Policy at Johns Hopkin and World Health Organization… then perhaps nations will finally learn how to shut down their economies.
After COVID-19 was announced as a global pandemic by the World Health Organization, the COVID-19 Response Team at London’s Imperial College wasted no time in using the same predictive modeling techniques that failed so miserably on climate catastrophe projections to begin forecasting end times scenarios for the coronavirus outbreak. March 17 models projected over 500 000 UK deaths and 2.2 million American deaths over the coming months. These numbers were quickly taken up by the WHO and spread across international media to justify the study’s “remedy” of a full “shut down of major aspects of society for over a year.” Despite the fact that these models were adjusted to predict only 20 000 UK deaths and 100 000 US deaths a week later, the calls to keep the world economy shut down for 12-18 months continued by Dr. Fauci, Gates, Soros and leading experts from the WHO, some of whom were caught on camera advocating breaking into homes to separate family members who have COVID.
For those paying attention, Michael Bloomberg isn’t only a famous billionaire corporatist who paid $500 million to get his ass kicked on public television, but is also Mark Carney’s green bosom buddy who acted as United Nations Special Envoy for Climate Change from 2018-2019 until Carney took over the position. Bloomberg also chairs Carney’s Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures which is a keystone piece of the new green cathedral of anti-growth economics which will punish all “climate offending” companies by cutting them from credit while rewarding “green zero-carbon” companies which accelerate human population collapse.
Bloomberg’s School of Public Health just so happened to co-sponsor the October 19, 2019, Global Pandemic Exercise Event 201 alongside the Bill Gates & Melinda Gates Foundation, and World Economic Forum which ran computer simulations under the theme of a novel coronavirus pandemic killing 60 million people. Over the years while taking over economic, foreign policy and environmental policies of formerly industrial advanced nations of the western alliance, the neo-Malthusian movement also took over medical research through a gradual co-opting of funding of the World Health Organization by private foundations which have increasingly replaced the role of the nation over the past 4 decades.
Today the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has become the primary financier of the WTO (taking the top spot with Trump’s recent announcement of America’s exit from it’s supporting role). With their interests so intertwined with Big Pharma, and the Five Eyes intelligence agencies, medical practice and medical policy have been put firmly under the control of an elite cadre of “scientific experts” who play God with the human race in ivory towers “untouched by politics” beholden only to the cold hard numbers of ‘predictive models’.
Both Gates and Bloomberg are among the top five world billionaires who run “The Giving Pledge”– which is a foundation made up of “good” plutocrats who pledged to donate half their wealth to charities. What are billions after all, when you know the system you parasitically exploited is designed to collapse? As Carney stated last year, those “that anticipate these developments will be rewarded handsomely; those that fail to adapt will cease to exist.”
Those industrial interests whom Carney threatened in his speech include those “dirty” (see “productive”) agro-industrial interests who are generally unhappy about the idea of being sacrificed on the altar of Gaia and would rather join China’s multi-trillion dollar Belt and Road Initiative, as the crisis continues to move closer to the inevitable collapse of the $1.2 quadrillion bubble economy. As this future collapse point accelerates towards the present, the oligarchy knows that nations enmeshed in the west’s monetarist net will gladly jump into the Multipolar Alliance as an alternative to their total destruction if for no other reason.
The Multi-Polar Alliance Re-asserts the Hegemony of the Human Mind over Computer Modelling
The beauty of the new Multipolar Alliance guided by the associated Belt and Road Initiative Framework is this new system’s reliance upon the non-linearity of human creative thought. By defining future states of humanity not as a crisis caused by human cancer cells killing Gaia, the new system approaches the future from the standpoint of creative change. By investing in space exploration, asteroid defense, lunar mining, fusion and fission development, and large scale infrastructure the Multipolar Alliance is bringing mankind back into harmony with the demands for boundless scientific and technological progress within creation.
Speaking to the CPC central committee in 2016, President Xi said:
“Coordinated development is the unity of balanced development and imbalanced development. The process from balance to imbalance and then to rebalance is the basic law of development. Balance is relative while imbalance is absolute. Emphasizing coordinated development is not pursuing equalitarianism, but giving more importance to equal opportunities and balanced resource allocation.”
In an earlier speech, Xi developed this concept even further:
“We must consider innovation as the primary driving force of growth and the core in this whole undertaking, and human resources as the primary source to support development. We should promote innovation in theory, systems, science and technology, and culture, and make innovation the dominant theme in the work of the Party, and government, and everyday activity in society… In the 16th century, human society entered an unprecedented period of active innovation. Achievements in scientific innovation over the past five centuries have exceeded the sum total of several previous millennia. . . . Each and every scientific and industrial revolution has profoundly changed the outlook and pattern of world development. . . . Since the second Industrial Revolution, the U.S. has maintained global hegemony because it has always been the leader and the largest beneficiary of scientific and industrial progress.”
In a 2019 speech calling for Russia’s prioritization of fusion power as a replacement to the fossil fuel economy, President Putin expressed similar insights saying:
“It may seem strange at first, but fusion energy, which in fact is similar to how heat and light are produced in our star, in the Sun, is an example of such nature-like technologies.
“Potentially we can harness a colossal, inexhaustible and safe source of energy. However, we will only succeed in fusion energy and in solving other fundamental tasks if we establish broad international cooperation and interaction between government and business, and join the efforts of researchers representing different scientific schools and areas. If technological development becomes truly global, it will not be split up or reined in by attempts to monopolize progress, limit access to education and put up new obstacles to the free exchange of knowledge and ideas… With their help, scientists will be able to literally see nature’s creative processes.”
So when Putin or Xi come out calling for a new economic order to replace the currently collapsing one, this is the spirit of the system he is talking about. They are talking about a system that rejects ‘predictive modeling’ using linear equations in favor of the REALITY of human creative mentation as a non-linear YET intelligible geological force of change bringing humanity into ever greater harmony with the laws of creation.


veteranstoday--2020-04-17--Might Russia-China-USA Alliance for Space Exploration Define New ‘New World Order’?

Whatever forces are behind the current spread of the coronavirus justifying the shutdown of major nations across the globe , one thing is increasingly certain : a new system will absolutely emerge from the currently collapsing one .
What remains to be seen is whether this new system will be shaped by those fascist crisis-loving technocrats pushing for unipolar world order , or whether it will be organized by sovereign nation-states working together under a multipolar community of principle .
Amidst the confusion and fear-driven by the global pandemic , President Trump passed a fascinating Executive Order on April 6 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Moon which may serve as the gateway to shaping a new system of economic relations , rules and values around a shared future for humankind .
Trump ’ s Executive Order states in part that “ successful long term exploration and scientific discoveries of the Moon , Mars and other celestial bodies will require partnerships with commercial entities to recover and use resources , including water and certain minerals in outer space.
” In stark opposition to those cynics who wish to analyze every event from the lens of simple geopolitics , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in space ( promoted by the Space Force ideologues seeking to extend militarisation beyond earth ) and rather calls for cooperation , stating that the USA “ shall seek to negotiate joint statements and bilateral and multilateral arrangements with foreign states regarding safe and sustainable operations for the public and private recovery and use of space resources.
” This potential for a shared future for global ( and celestial ) development stands in stark opposition to certain forces who would rather use the two-fold crisis of economic collapse and viral pandemics to usher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world government under a Global Green New Deal .
As I wrote in an earlier paper , this clash is exemplified by the closed system thinking of Malthusians and neocons vs. the open system thinking of genuine patriots and world citizens .
How the Dream of Open System Economics Was Lost It was once believed in the west that the future would be beautiful , just , and as plentiful as it was peaceful .
Under John F. Kennedy ’ s bold leadership the idea of space exploration was more than a simple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ human being on the moon “ within the decade and returning him safely back home ” .
Far from this narrow view , JFK and many leading American scientists saw this goal as a springboard to a new age of creative growth for all humanity both on the Moon and beyond .
These stirring forecasts of an age of reason can still be heard in recordings of Kennedy ’ s Rice University address of September 12 , 1962 .
Unbeknownst to many , JFK also called for a USA-Russia joint Moon landing in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of MAD and had this plan not been derailed , the world would have found itself on a much different trajectory .
Unfortunately , history unfolded on a different course .
After JFK ’ s murder ( weeks after the above speech ) , his program to remove troops from Vietnam was reversed and the USA was plunged into the disastrous Vietnam war for over a decade .
As the war grew , federal funds needed for science and exploration were increasingly absorbed by the military-industrial complex .
By 1972 , the last @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and by 1976 , Russia ’ s last lunar project also occurred with Luna 6 .
Although small efforts to keep the dream alive continued in piecemeal form over the years , Apollo was scrapped and national support for long-term objectives slowly decayed and a generation of space scientists and engineers found themselves disillusioned by decades of broken promises and a lost dream .
Russian scientists suffering the debilitating effects of Perestroika shared in this dismal experience and found themselves unemployed throughout the 1990s and in many cases forced to use their powerful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of London in order to make ends meet ( giving rise to the age of quants and speculative high-frequency derivatives trading ) .
During this period of disenchantment , China arose silently under the radar patiently building its capacities from scratch .
Although its first satellite launch took place during the height of the Cultural Revolution in 1970 , the Chinese space program grew much more slowly than its counterparts in Russia or the USA .
Patiently learning from the best engineering feats of the west , under the wise guidance of Deng @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nation to successfully send a human into orbit in 2003 and one decade later , became the first nation in 37 years to return to the Moon with the successful landing of the Chang ’ e-3 rover in December 2013 .
Lieutenant General Zhang Yulin called this program “ the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation ” and the world came to soon see what incredible plans were yet in store for China ’ s goals in space .
Soon China had launched the Tiangong 1 and 2 ( Heavenly Palace ) test @ @ @ @ @ @ @ launching of the Large Modular Space Station named Tianhe ( “ Harmony of the Heavens ” ) which will be a vital platform for the earth-lunar economy for decades .
On January 3 , 2019 , China set a world milestone by becoming the first nation to successfully land a rover on the far side of the moon with Change 4 , which has begun topographical , resource and geological mappings of the lunar surface .
Change ’ s 5 , 6 , and 7 will continue these explorations while adding the feature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ preparing the groundwork for a permanent lunar base by 2030 .
Chang ’ e-8 will be especially important as it will print the first-ever 3D structures on the Moon by 2028 .
Unfortunately , due to the Obama-era “ Wolf Act ” of 2011 , American scientists could not participate in these achievements and had to watch from afar as China swiftly leaped to the forefront of space science dethroning America from the unchallenged stature she once enjoyed .
Earlier in 2013 , before Chang ’ e-3 landed on the Moon , another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a sort of a divine slap in the face for many .
This wake-up call took the form of a 9000-ton asteroid which exploded 22 km over Chelyabinsk , Russia sending shock waves that shattered windows and injured over 2000 citizens .
The Chelyabinsk incident served as a timely reminder that the universe offers enough existential challenges for humanity without the additional man-made calamities of regime change wars and fighting over diminishing returns of resources .
From this Russian incident , NASA ’ s Planetary Defense Coordination Office was created to begin to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ space alongside similar departments in Roscosmos , and the European and Chinese Space Agencies .
Ouyang Ziyan ( the father of China ’ s lunar program ) stated that asteroid defense “ is worth attention while we are devoted to building a community with a shared future for humanity… Scientists around the world should cooperate to monitor near-Earth asteroids.
” In November 2019 , Roscosmos Director of Science and Long Term Programs ( Alexander Bloshenko ) stated that Russia ’ s lunar development goals which included a base on the underside of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asteroid defense stating : “ There are plans to install equipment on this [ lunar ] base to study deep space and special telescopes to track asteroids and comets that pose a danger with their collision with earth.
” By Summer 2019 , NASA ’ s administrator Jim Bridenstine also announced his intention for USA-Russian cooperation on asteroid defense- joining the earlier call made by Roscosmos ’ head Dimitri Rogozin for a “ Strategic Defense of Earth ” which Rogozin described as a way to redirect nuclear weapons towards a common threat in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This call for cooperation dovetails the two-fold space strategy unveiled by President Trump in December 2017 with Space Policy Directive 1 : Reinvigorating America ’ s Human Space Exploration Program , where he called for 1 ) The creation of the Lunar Gateway space station to orbit the Moon and 2 ) the launching of the Artemis Project that will “ lead the return of humans to the Moon for long term exploration and utilisation , followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.
” These developments were punctuated by Trump who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to call for an alliance that too many analysts have chosen to ignore saying on April 4 , 2019 : “ Between Russia , China and us , we ’ re all making hundreds of billions of dollars worth of weapons , including nuclear , which is ridiculous… I think it ’ s much better if we all got together and didn ’ t make these weapons… those three countries I think can come together and stop the spending and spend on things that are more productive toward long term peace.
” Although @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the schedule for the Orion capsule and space launch system mega-rocket needed to carry out the Artemis Project , the scheduled 2024 landing of a man and woman onto the moon ’ s surface is still on course .
But it doesn ’ t end there .
Leading officials among all three Russian , Chinese and American space agencies have called for going beyond asteroid defense , and colonization with the call for lunar , mars and asteroid resource development strategies .
These strategies require that humanity redefine the practice of “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ known for thousands of years , but also re-define what a “ resource ” is , what “ energy ” is and what are the limits ( if any ) to human growth ?
A helpful tool to conceptualize this revolution in thinking can be found in the 10-minute video All the World ’ s A Mine made in 2013 : In carefully mapping the lunar terrain with a focus on the far side of the moon , China wishes to come to a better understanding of the mineral distribution of vital resources @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aluminum , water , oxygen and hydrogen and especially Helium-3 which are abundant on the lunar regolith .
Helium-3 , long called the “ Philosophers ’ Stone ” of energy is the most efficient fuel source for fusion power when fused with deuterium or tritium in plasma and though it is nearly non-existent on the earth exists in vast quantities on the moon due to the absence of a geomagnetic field .
As the Moon ’ s far side never faces the earth or the earth ’ s magnetic field , there are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that have accumulated there over millennia .
Ouyang Ziyuan stated clearly that Helium-3 could “ solve humanity ’ s energy demand for 10 000 years at least ” since “ each year , three space shuttle missions could bring enough fuel for all human beings across the world.
” In 2013 , Ziyuan stated “ The Moon is full of resources- mainly rare Earth elements , titanium and uranium which the Earth is really short of , and these resources can be used without limitation… There are so many potential developments- it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fully utilize the Moon to support sustainable development for humans and society.
” China ’ s Premier Li Keqiang added his voice to the mix stating : “ China ’ s manned space and lunar probe missions have a twofold purpose : first , to explore the origin of the universe and mystery of human life ; and second , to make peaceful use of outer space… Peaceful use of outer space is conducive to China ’ s development .
China ’ s manned space program has proceeded to the stage of building @ @ @ @ @ @ @ step by step.
” In September 2019 , Russia and China signed a historical agreement to jointly collaborate on lunar development uniting the Chang ’ e-7 plans with Russia ’ s Lunar 26 Orbiter and lunar base development which both nations have on the agenda for 2030-2035 .
A Word on the Moon Treaty of 1979 Donald Trump ’ s explicit rejection of the Moon Treaty of 1979 in his recent executive order , has garnered many angry criticisms which on closer inspection are completely unfounded .
The 1979 Treaty requiring that all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by an international framework appears on the surface to be quite sensible .
So is Trump ’ s rejection of any obedience to an “ international framework ” at this moment in history evidence of his selfish-nationalistic impulses to impose gangster capitalism onto the whole universe ?
Not at all .
As stated at the beginning of this report , President Trump ’ s order calls explicitly for “ encouraging international support for the recovery and use of space resources ” which is in no way characteristic of “ narrow-minded selfish nationalism ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the many neocon ideologues struggling to take control of U.S. Space policy .
Also when one considers that only 4 nations ratified that 1979 treaty ( France , Guatemala , India , and Romania ) , Trump ’ s refusal to obey it is not nearly as a renegade and selfish as those critics make it appear .
Finally , when one considers who would define that “ international framework ” and considers the zero-growth paradigm currently dominant across the UN and European Union technocracy , then it quickly becomes clear that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ industrial civilization is totally incompatible with the pro-growth , pro-space mining orientation of Russia , China and Trump ’ s USA alike .

Whatever forces are behind the current spread of the coronavirus justifying the shutdown of major nations across the globe, one thing is increasingly certain: a new system will absolutely emerge from the currently collapsing one. What remains to be seen is whether this new system will be shaped by those fascist crisis-loving technocrats pushing for unipolar world order, or whether it will be organized by sovereign nation-states working together under a multipolar community of principle.
Amidst the confusion and fear-driven by the global pandemic, President Trump passed a fascinating Executive Order on April 6 calling for the mining of asteroids and the Moon which may serve as the gateway to shaping a new system of economic relations, rules and values around a shared future for humankind. Trump’s Executive Order states in part that “successful long term exploration and scientific discoveries of the Moon, Mars and other celestial bodies will require partnerships with commercial entities to recover and use resources, including water and certain minerals in outer space.”
In stark opposition to those cynics who wish to analyze every event from the lens of simple geopolitics, the executive order goes onto reject unilateralism in space (promoted by the Space Force ideologues seeking to extend militarisation beyond earth) and rather calls for cooperation, stating that the USA “shall seek to negotiate joint statements and bilateral and multilateral arrangements with foreign states regarding safe and sustainable operations for the public and private recovery and use of space resources.”
This potential for a shared future for global (and celestial) development stands in stark opposition to certain forces who would rather use the two-fold crisis of economic collapse and viral pandemics to usher in a new age of fascism and world government under a Global Green New Deal. As I wrote in an earlier paper, this clash is exemplified by the closed system thinking of Malthusians and neocons vs. the open system thinking of genuine patriots and world citizens.
How the Dream of Open System Economics Was Lost
It was once believed in the west that the future would be beautiful, just, and as plentiful as it was peaceful. Under John F. Kennedy’s bold leadership the idea of space exploration was more than a simple “space race” or plopping a human being on the moon “within the decade and returning him safely back home”. Far from this narrow view, JFK and many leading American scientists saw this goal as a springboard to a new age of creative growth for all humanity both on the Moon and beyond. These stirring forecasts of an age of reason can still be heard in recordings of Kennedy’s Rice University address of September 12, 1962.
Unbeknownst to many, JFK also called for a USA-Russia joint Moon landing in order to defuse the Cold War formula of MAD and had this plan not been derailed, the world would have found itself on a much different trajectory.
Unfortunately, history unfolded on a different course. After JFK’s murder (weeks after the above speech), his program to remove troops from Vietnam was reversed and the USA was plunged into the disastrous Vietnam war for over a decade. As the war grew, federal funds needed for science and exploration were increasingly absorbed by the military-industrial complex.
By 1972, the last human mission on the Moon took place and by 1976, Russia’s last lunar project also occurred with Luna 6. Although small efforts to keep the dream alive continued in piecemeal form over the years, Apollo was scrapped and national support for long-term objectives slowly decayed and a generation of space scientists and engineers found themselves disillusioned by decades of broken promises and a lost dream.
Russian scientists suffering the debilitating effects of Perestroika shared in this dismal experience and found themselves unemployed throughout the 1990s and in many cases forced to use their powerful mathematical skills in the financial services sector of London in order to make ends meet (giving rise to the age of quants and speculative high-frequency derivatives trading).
During this period of disenchantment, China arose silently under the radar patiently building its capacities from scratch.
The Rise of China’s Space Program
Although its first satellite launch took place during the height of the Cultural Revolution in 1970, the Chinese space program grew much more slowly than its counterparts in Russia or the USA. Patiently learning from the best engineering feats of the west, under the wise guidance of Deng Xiaoping, China finally became the third nation to successfully send a human into orbit in 2003 and one decade later, became the first nation in 37 years to return to the Moon with the successful landing of the Chang’e-3 rover in December 2013. Lieutenant General Zhang Yulin called this program “the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation” and the world came to soon see what incredible plans were yet in store for China’s goals in space.
Soon China had launched the Tiangong 1 and 2 (Heavenly Palace) test space stations in preparation for the 2021 launching of the Large Modular Space Station named Tianhe (“Harmony of the Heavens”) which will be a vital platform for the earth-lunar economy for decades.
On January 3, 2019, China set a world milestone by becoming the first nation to successfully land a rover on the far side of the moon with Change 4, which has begun topographical, resource and geological mappings of the lunar surface. Change’s 5, 6, and 7 will continue these explorations while adding the feature of returning samples to the earth and preparing the groundwork for a permanent lunar base by 2030. Chang’e-8 will be especially important as it will print the first-ever 3D structures on the Moon by 2028.
Unfortunately, due to the Obama-era “Wolf Act” of 2011, American scientists could not participate in these achievements and had to watch from afar as China swiftly leaped to the forefront of space science dethroning America from the unchallenged stature she once enjoyed.
Asteroid Threats
Earlier in 2013, before Chang’e-3 landed on the Moon, another humbling event took place and served as a sort of a divine slap in the face for many. This wake-up call took the form of a 9000-ton asteroid which exploded 22 km over Chelyabinsk, Russia sending shock waves that shattered windows and injured over 2000 citizens. The Chelyabinsk incident served as a timely reminder that the universe offers enough existential challenges for humanity without the additional man-made calamities of regime change wars and fighting over diminishing returns of resources.
From this Russian incident, NASA’s Planetary Defense Coordination Office was created to begin to establish a plan for asteroid threats from space alongside similar departments in Roscosmos, and the European and Chinese Space Agencies. Ouyang Ziyan (the father of China’s lunar program) stated that asteroid defense “is worth attention while we are devoted to building a community with a shared future for humanity… Scientists around the world should cooperate to monitor near-Earth asteroids.”
In November 2019, Roscosmos Director of Science and Long Term Programs (Alexander Bloshenko) stated that Russia’s lunar development goals which included a base on the underside of the Moon within a decade were intertwined with asteroid defense stating:
“There are plans to install equipment on this [lunar] base to study deep space and special telescopes to track asteroids and comets that pose a danger with their collision with earth.”
By Summer 2019, NASA’s administrator Jim Bridenstine also announced his intention for USA-Russian cooperation on asteroid defense- joining the earlier call made by Roscosmos’ head Dimitri Rogozin for a “Strategic Defense of Earth” which Rogozin described as a way to redirect nuclear weapons towards a common threat in space rather than towards each other. This call for cooperation dovetails the two-fold space strategy unveiled by President Trump in December 2017 with Space Policy Directive 1: Reinvigorating America’s Human Space Exploration Program, where he called for
1) The creation of the Lunar Gateway space station to orbit the Moon and
2) the launching of the Artemis Project that will “lead the return of humans to the Moon for long term exploration and utilisation, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.”
These developments were punctuated by Trump who took the time from his impeachment fiasco to call for an alliance that too many analysts have chosen to ignore saying on April 4, 2019:
“Between Russia, China and us, we’re all making hundreds of billions of dollars worth of weapons, including nuclear, which is ridiculous… I think it’s much better if we all got together and didn’t make these weapons… those three countries I think can come together and stop the spending and spend on things that are more productive toward long term peace.”
Although the COVID-19 lockdown has done major damage to the schedule for the Orion capsule and space launch system mega-rocket needed to carry out the Artemis Project, the scheduled 2024 landing of a man and woman onto the moon’s surface is still on course.
A Revolution in Mining: Redefining “Resources”
But it doesn’t end there. Leading officials among all three Russian, Chinese and American space agencies have called for going beyond asteroid defense, and colonization with the call for lunar, mars and asteroid resource development strategies. These strategies require that humanity redefine the practice of “mining” as it has hitherto been known for thousands of years, but also re-define what a “resource” is, what “energy” is and what are the limits (if any) to human growth?
A helpful tool to conceptualize this revolution in thinking can be found in the 10-minute video All the World’s A Mine made in 2013:
In carefully mapping the lunar terrain with a focus on the far side of the moon, China wishes to come to a better understanding of the mineral distribution of vital resources like Titanium, Iron, silicon, aluminum, water, oxygen and hydrogen and especially Helium-3 which are abundant on the lunar regolith. Helium-3, long called the “Philosophers’ Stone” of energy is the most efficient fuel source for fusion power when fused with deuterium or tritium in plasma and though it is nearly non-existent on the earth exists in vast quantities on the moon due to the absence of a geomagnetic field. As the Moon’s far side never faces the earth or the earth’s magnetic field, there are far more abundant volumes of solar-produced Helium-3 that have accumulated there over millennia.
Ouyang Ziyuan stated clearly that Helium-3 could “solve humanity’s energy demand for 10 000 years at least” since “each year, three space shuttle missions could bring enough fuel for all human beings across the world.”
In 2013, Ziyuan stated “The Moon is full of resources- mainly rare Earth elements, titanium and uranium which the Earth is really short of, and these resources can be used without limitation… There are so many potential developments- it’s beautiful- so we hope we can fully utilize the Moon to support sustainable development for humans and society.”
China’s Premier Li Keqiang added his voice to the mix stating: “China’s manned space and lunar probe missions have a twofold purpose: first, to explore the origin of the universe and mystery of human life; and second, to make peaceful use of outer space… Peaceful use of outer space is conducive to China’s development. China’s manned space program has proceeded to the stage of building a space station and will move forward step by step.”
In September 2019, Russia and China signed a historical agreement to jointly collaborate on lunar development uniting the Chang’e-7 plans with Russia’s Lunar 26 Orbiter and lunar base development which both nations have on the agenda for 2030-2035.
A Word on the Moon Treaty of 1979
Donald Trump’s explicit rejection of the Moon Treaty of 1979 in his recent executive order, has garnered many angry criticisms which on closer inspection are completely unfounded. The 1979 Treaty requiring that all commercial activities in space must be defined by an international framework appears on the surface to be quite sensible. So is Trump’s rejection of any obedience to an “international framework” at this moment in history evidence of his selfish-nationalistic impulses to impose gangster capitalism onto the whole universe? Not at all.
As stated at the beginning of this report, President Trump’s order calls explicitly for “encouraging international support for the recovery and use of space resources” which is in no way characteristic of “narrow-minded selfish nationalism” or “unilateral militarism” extolled by the many neocon ideologues struggling to take control of U.S. Space policy. Also when one considers that only 4 nations ratified that 1979 treaty (France, Guatemala, India, and Romania), Trump’s refusal to obey it is not nearly as a renegade and selfish as those critics make it appear.
Finally, when one considers who would define that “international framework” and considers the zero-growth paradigm currently dominant across the UN and European Union technocracy, then it quickly becomes clear that the Green New Deal agenda for shutting down industrial civilization is totally incompatible with the pro-growth, pro-space mining orientation of Russia, China and Trump’s USA alike.


veteranstoday--2020-04-17--Make America Dead Again: ‘No Lockdown’ States See Massive COVID Surge

CNN : Just as cases are starting to plateau in some big cities and along the coasts , the coronavirus is catching fire in rural states across the American heartland , where there has been a small but significant spike this week in cases .
Playing out amid these outbreaks is a clash between a frontier culture that values individual freedom and personal responsibility , and the onerous but necessary restrictions to contain a novel biological threat .
The bump in coronavirus cases is most pronounced in states without a stay at home orders .
Oklahoma saw a 53 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University .
Over the same time , cases jumped 60 % in Arkansas , 74 % in Nebraska , and 82 % in Iowa .
South Dakota saw a whopping 205 % spike .
The remaining states , North Dakota , Utah , and Wyoming each saw an increase in cases , but more in line with other places that have stay-at-home orders .
And all of those numbers may very well undercount the total cases , given a persistent lack of testing across the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perpetuated by President Donald Trump and some of his Republican allies that the restrictive social-distancing measures aren ’ t necessary for rural America — and that these states even offer a model for reopening the country .
“ If you look at Montana , Wyoming , North Dakota — that ’ s a lot different than New York , it ’ s a lot different than New Jersey , ” Trump said at Thursday ’ s coronavirus task force briefing , adding that 29 states are “ in that ballgame ” of being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We have large sections of the country right now that can start thinking about opening , ” Trump added .

CNN: Just as cases are starting to plateau in some big cities and along the coasts, the coronavirus is catching fire in rural states across the American heartland, where there has been a small but significant spike this week in cases. Playing out amid these outbreaks is a clash between a frontier culture that values individual freedom and personal responsibility, and the onerous but necessary restrictions to contain a novel biological threat.
The bump in coronavirus cases is most pronounced in states without a stay at home orders. Oklahoma saw a 53% increase in cases over the past week, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. Over the same time, cases jumped 60% in Arkansas, 74% in Nebraska, and 82% in Iowa. South Dakota saw a whopping 205% spike.
The remaining states, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming each saw an increase in cases, but more in line with other places that have stay-at-home orders. And all of those numbers may very well undercount the total cases, given a persistent lack of testing across the US.
This trend undermines the notion perpetuated by President Donald Trump and some of his Republican allies that the restrictive social-distancing measures aren’t necessary for rural America — and that these states even offer a model for reopening the country.
“If you look at Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota — that’s a lot different than New York, it’s a lot different than New Jersey,” Trump said at Thursday’s coronavirus task force briefing, adding that 29 states are “in that ballgame” of being ready to be reopened first. “We have large sections of the country right now that can start thinking about opening,” Trump added. Source: CNN


veteranstoday--2020-04-17--Sinking Hopelessness at Trump’s Failures, Duff on Press TV

Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War .
He is a disabled veteran and has worked @ @ @ @ @ for decades .
Gordon is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of @ @ @ @ @ .
He manages the world ’ s largest private intelligence organization and regularly consults with @ @ @ @ @ has traveled extensively , is published around the world and is a regular guest on @ @ @ @ @ than “ several ” countries .
He is also a trained chef , wine enthusiast @ @ @ @ @ specializing in historical weapons and restoration .
Business experience and interests are in energy and @ @ @

Gordon Duff posted articles on VT from 2008 to 2022. He is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War. A disabled veteran, he worked on veterans and POW issues for decades.
Gordon is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists. He manages the world’s largest private intelligence organization and regularly consults with governments challenged by security issues.
Duff has traveled extensively, is published around the world, and is a regular guest on TV and radio in more than “several” countries. He is also a trained chef, wine enthusiast, avid motorcyclist, and gunsmith specializing in historical weapons and restoration. Business experience and interests are in energy and defense technology.


veteranstoday--2020-04-17--COVID 19:  Global Democracy Blackout and the Brave New World

of tramway car , metaphor for the Government The first global earnest response of Italian Prime Minister to COVID 19 viral attack taking upon all powers to the leader in a country after fascism immunized to it and so extremely reluctant to the concentration of power even in strong democratic leadership , traditionally anarchist ; and locking down the whole country , had been an exemplary pattern for all other Western Countries .
Incredible to say Italy as a leading nation for its health push politics among the Western ones !
Even those that weren ’ t very likely willing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kingdom and the United States of America .
For their democratic principles and traditions .
As we have seen with the responses in the progress of their leaders Johnson and Trump .
But the writer of this piece , besides his being of Italian birth , isn ’ t proud of it at all , but being rather ashamed of it .
Since he regards such response as the wrong , because extremely anti-democratic and anti-constitutional from a political and juridical point of view and both , last but not least , extremely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and those of the whole Western world .
Mainly for the chance of survival of small and medium businesses and consequently for the future impact of unemployment .
And , since the nature of the Italian economy based among others on much small business and with a naturally high rate of unemployment , Conte ’ s response to COVID 19 is absolutely economically self-destructive !
I don ’ t mean that Conte should not take any social distancing measure , although of the fact that such measures had proven historically to be generally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the alleged threat .
Over-estimating it and adopting the wrong health measures .
I agree with the first responses of Johnson and Trump tending to resize the threat before under the pressure of mainstream media they were forced to join the dominating narration allegedly imposed by WHO under the orders of Bill Gates .
In fact , I don ’ t think that Johnson and Trump were lacking professional advice in economics and medicine and social policies even if some of those advisors could be embedded after WHO and Gates .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrong .
Let me explain why and what was the proper solution for me .
No doubt COVID 19 had been a health challenge and as a challenge had to be faced with emergency measures much more creative than those adopted fro the very beginning of the crisis .
Since the problem in its very essence , it was the lack of better shortage of ICU/ITU beds in hospitals the best solution for me would have been for me to introduce as much ELASTICITY in the system as possible .
Instead of following @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time of “ peace ” , they should have adopted protocols of emergency , lowering the standards of ITU/ICU care in order to multiply ICU/ITU beds in hospitals .
That after all , in this case , had to be designed for a specific respiratory syndrome instead of a general ICU/ITU .
On the other side , there should have been a strong prompt incentive by the Government either fiscal and investment to the private industry to soon convert it to the production and supply of medicines and any other material necessary to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In the end , believe that this had been and still is and will be for some time complex hybrid warfare .
At the lowest level is low-intensity biological warfare ( either Fort Detrick or Wuhan made ) but this is the least .
At a higher level , this is a Psychological Warfare with the global mainstream media system aligned and allied to magnify and emphasize it ( allegedly following WHO and Bill Gates ) .
Some other interests connected with the financial control of the global mainstream media system may have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WHO , but these , for now , are shadowy in their structure that is anyway antidemocratic , oligarchic and monopolistic .
In fact for all other subjects , the COVID 19 policies and the consequent collapse of the economy would be just a self-defeating choice .
At the highest level that is that of just a very-very few belong to , that are Xi Jinping , Putin , and Trump , sort of new Big Three , a new Treaty whose contents is nearly unknowable to all mere mortals as we all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and/or a new balance for the Three Superpowers , this Black Out of Democracy is a unique opportunity for the Superpowers to renegotiate a New World Order with no uncomfortable intruders for being so many ( 10 , 100 , 1000 or whatever ) and at a different level , so that even a goodwill choice would be impossible to satisfy any point of view .
The nature of this covert Treaty , Agreement or Conference would be either Strategic and/or Monetary , similar just to one or more of the following three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of WWI , Bretton Woods Agreements and Yalta Conference at the end of WWII .
But be sure that , at the end of Global Lockdown , we will have a New World Order .
Source : Free Download MP3 of OUT OF CONTROl on SoundCloud.com

By Claudio Resta for VT Italy
“Do not disturb the driver”
(Benito Mussolini)
of tramway car, metaphor for the Government
to justify Duce absolute leadership
The first global earnest response of Italian Prime Minister to COVID 19 viral attack taking upon all powers to the leader in a country after fascism immunized to it and so extremely reluctant to the concentration of power even in strong democratic leadership, traditionally anarchist; and locking down the whole country, had been an exemplary pattern for all other Western Countries.
Incredible to say Italy as a leading nation for its health push politics among the Western ones!
Even those that weren’t very likely willing to follow it such as the United Kingdom and the United States of America. For their democratic principles and traditions.
As we have seen with the responses in the progress of their leaders Johnson and Trump.
But the writer of this piece, besides his being of Italian birth, isn’t proud of it at all, but being rather ashamed of it.
Since he regards such response as the wrong, because extremely anti-democratic and anti-constitutional from a political and juridical point of view and both, last but not least, extremely destructive for the economy of the country and those of the whole Western world.
Mainly for the chance of survival of small and medium businesses and consequently for the future impact of unemployment.
And, since the nature of the Italian economy based among others on much small business and with a naturally high rate of unemployment, Conte’s response to COVID 19 is absolutely economically self-destructive!
I don’t mean that Conte should not take any social distancing measure, although of the fact that such measures had proven historically to be generally ineffective, but that they were disproportionate to the alleged threat. Over-estimating it and adopting the wrong health measures.
I agree with the first responses of Johnson and Trump tending to resize the threat before under the pressure of mainstream media they were forced to join the dominating narration allegedly imposed by WHO under the orders of Bill Gates.
In fact, I don’t think that Johnson and Trump were lacking professional advice in economics and medicine and social policies even if some of those advisors could be embedded after WHO and Gates.
But before I mentioned Conte health measures as wrong. Let me explain why and what was the proper solution for me.
No doubt COVID 19 had been a health challenge and as a challenge had to be faced with emergency measures much more creative than those adopted fro the very beginning of the crisis.
Since the problem in its very essence, it was the lack of better shortage of ICU/ITU beds in hospitals
(because of a short view health policy imposed by EU spending review forced Italy to halve at least and some times to reduces a third the ICU/ITU beds in Italian hospitals in the last three decades, odds that were already low on the average of European Countries, perhaps insight of possible future privatization of the Public National Health System…)
the best solution for me would have been for me to introduce as much ELASTICITY in the system as possible.
Instead of following strictly the protocols of WHO for the time of “peace”, they should have adopted protocols of emergency, lowering the standards of ITU/ICU care in order to multiply ICU/ITU beds in hospitals.
That after all, in this case, had to be designed for a specific respiratory syndrome instead of a general ICU/ITU.
On the other side, there should have been a strong prompt incentive by the Government either fiscal and investment to the private industry to soon convert it to the production and supply of medicines and any other material necessary to fight COVID 19 mainly in ICU/ITU.
In the end, believe that this had been and still is and will be for some time complex hybrid warfare.
At the lowest level is low-intensity biological warfare (either Fort Detrick or Wuhan made) but this is the least.
At a higher level, this is a Psychological Warfare with the global mainstream media system aligned and allied to magnify and emphasize it (allegedly following WHO and Bill Gates).
Some other interests connected with the financial control of the global mainstream media system may have joined the narration originally of Gates controlled WHO, but these, for now, are shadowy in their structure that is anyway antidemocratic, oligarchic and monopolistic.
In fact for all other subjects, the COVID 19 policies and the consequent collapse of the economy would be just a self-defeating choice.
At the highest level that is that of just a very-very few belong to, that are Xi Jinping, Putin, and Trump, sort of new Big Three, a new Treaty whose contents is nearly unknowable to all mere mortals as we all are, perhaps a new global currency and/or a new balance for the Three Superpowers, this Black Out of Democracy is a unique opportunity for the Superpowers to renegotiate a New World Order with no uncomfortable intruders for being so many (10, 100, 1000 or whatever) and at a different level, so that even a goodwill choice would be impossible to satisfy any point of view.
The nature of this covert Treaty, Agreement or Conference would be either Strategic and/or Monetary, similar just to one or more of the following three: Treaty of Versailles at the end of WWI, Bretton Woods Agreements and Yalta Conference at the end of WWII.
But be sure that, at the end of Global Lockdown, we will have a New World Order.
Source: Free Download MP3 of OUT OF CONTROl on SoundCloud.com


veteranstoday--2020-04-17--University of North Carolina: Evidence COVID-19 in Design Since 2003

VT : In 2017 , a “ study ” funded by a CIA front created COVID 19 at the University of North Carolina , made from a sample received from Wuhan .
Backtracking , we find this 2006 study on how to re-engineer the more deadly but less effective SARS virus into something exactly like COVID 19 , a study published by UNC in 2006 .
There are others dating back to 2006 , part of a covert Bush-era program to renew America ’ s biological warfare capability .
Source : Free Download MP3 of OUT OF CONTROL on SoundCloud.com @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by author exclusively .
Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT , authors , affiliates , advertisers , sponsors , partners or technicians .
Some content may be satirical in nature .
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT. About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy All content herein is owned by author exclusively .
Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT , authors , affiliates , advertisers , sponsors , partners or technicians .
Some content may be satirical in nature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of author and NOT VT .

VT: In 2017, a “study” funded by a CIA front created COVID 19 at the University of North Carolina, made from a sample received from Wuhan. Backtracking, we find this 2006 study on how to re-engineer the more deadly but less effective SARS virus into something exactly like COVID 19, a study published by UNC in 2006. There are others dating back to 2006, part of a covert Bush-era program to renew America’s biological warfare capability.
ATTENTION READERS We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion. Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.


veteranstoday--2020-04-17--Trump Warned Israel in November…but forgot about America

Sputnik/Moscow : An earlier ABC News report stated that US intelligence officials had warned the military and White House about the spread of a coronavirus outbreak in China as far back as late November 2019 , with the Pentagon denying the “ product/assessment ” existed .
If he `` ca n't recall , '' I 'm pretty sure he needs to resign .
We all know he 's covering for Trump……again .
US intelligence agencies warned Israel of the threat of a coronavirus outbreak in China as far back as in November 2019 , Israeli Channel 12 news reported Thursday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the report , learned of the disease circulating in China ’ s city of Wuhan in the second week of November , putting together a classified document that mapped out the potential dangers of its spread to other countries .
The report suggests that information pertaining to the virus was known only to the Chinese government at the time .
As the intelligence officials sought to convey the information to the White House , the Trump administration reportedly “ did not deem it of interest ” , yet saw fit to acquaint two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Israel .
In late November , Israeli military officials were cited in the report as having mulled the potential dangers of the virus spreading to the region and neighboring countries , with the classified information supposedly reaching politicians and the Health Ministry , where “ nothing was done.
” The news comes as on 9 April ABC News intimated that the American intelligence community had issued warnings about the coronavirus threat in a report prepared in December by the US military ’ s National Center for Medical Intelligence .
According to two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contents , cited by ABC News , concerns about a coronavirus outbreak in China ’ s Wuhan were laid out in a November intelligence bulletin penned by the National Center for Medical Intelligence ( NCMI ) , based on satellite images as well as analysis of wire and computer intercepts .
There was no comment from the White House National Security Council or the Office of the Director of National Intelligence , writes ABC News .
There has been no confirmation whether it was the same report that was allegedly shared with Israel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ since repeatedly denied concealing information in the early days of the outbreak , insisting it immediately reported it to the World Health Organization .

US intelligence agencies warned Israel of the threat of a coronavirus outbreak in China as far back as in November 2019, Israeli Channel 12 news reported Thursday.
A three-year-old German Shepherd named Anya joined her owner for a game of Jenga and tic-tac-toe during isolation in Ohio pic.twitter.com/5yBQsYCHTU — Reuters (@Reuters) April 17, 2020
The American intelligence community, says the report, learned of the disease circulating in China’s city of Wuhan in the second week of November, putting together a classified document that mapped out the potential dangers of its spread to other countries. The report suggests that information pertaining to the virus was known only to the Chinese government at the time.
© REUTERS / YURI GRIPAS U.S. President Donald Trump answers a question from CNN’s chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta about hospitals and frontline health care workers reporting shortages of masks and coronavirus tests during the coronavirus response daily briefing at the White House in Washington, U.S., April 10, 2020
As the intelligence officials sought to convey the information to the White House, the Trump administration reportedly “did not deem it of interest”, yet saw fit to acquaint two allies with the classified document, NATO and Israel.
In late November, Israeli military officials were cited in the report as having mulled the potential dangers of the virus spreading to the region and neighboring countries, with the classified information supposedly reaching politicians and the Health Ministry, where “nothing was done.”
© AP PHOTO / ARIEL SCHALIT An Israeli medical worker wearing protective gear takes a swab from an ultra-Orthodox Jewish man for a coronavirus test, as part of the government’s measures to stop the spread of the virus, in the Orthodox city of Bnei Brak, a suburb of Tel Aviv, Israel, Tuesday, March 31, 2020
The news comes as on 9 April ABC News intimated that the American intelligence community had issued warnings about the coronavirus threat in a report prepared in December by the US military’s National Center for Medical Intelligence.
According to two officials familiar with the document’s contents, cited by ABC News, concerns about a coronavirus outbreak in China’s Wuhan were laid out in a November intelligence bulletin penned by the National Center for Medical Intelligence (NCMI), based on satellite images as well as analysis of wire and computer intercepts.
“Analysts concluded it could be a cataclysmic event…It was then briefed multiple times to the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon’s Joint Staff and the White House,” Claimed one of the sources.
The Pentagon subsequently issued a statement denying the “product/assessment” existed.
There was no comment from the White House National Security Council or the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, writes ABC News.
There has been no confirmation whether it was the same report that was allegedly shared with Israel last year.
The Chinese government has since repeatedly denied concealing information in the early days of the outbreak, insisting it immediately reported it to the World Health Organization.


veteranstoday--2020-04-18--#UNRIG Video (2:44) Former Spy Calls for CounterIntelligence Study of Bill Gates, Insider Trading, M

#UNRIG Video (2:44) Former Spy Calls for CounterIntelligence Study of Bill Gates, Insider Trading, Media Liars

You can not win a war against a real pandemic .
The only way to defeat a biological attack is to identify and neutralize the people planning that attack , in advance .
In my personal view , neither China nor Russia are waging biological war against the USA — this is a war by the Deep State and its agents including Bill Gates , George Soros , WHO and the CDC , and selected rogue elements of the US and UK intelligence communities .
Of course it also helps to close down all your own bio-warfare facilities and work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the top practitioner on the planet for energetics , gravitobiology , and scalar ( time energy ) warfare , all of which can contain and neturalize both biological and electromagnetic attacks .
At the same time , it is vital to note that it was the fear-mongering out of control media — and timid ignorant governments — that wrecked the global economy , not the flu .
The time has come for an Open Source Agency and Web 3.0 and a new uncensored honest media and social media .
The truth about everything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ human health and prosperity and peace .
Former spy Robert David Steele , senior civilian founder of the US Marine Corps Intelligence Activity , recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2017 , and the pro bono Chief Counsel of the International Tribunal for Natural Justice , puts it on the line : we need to give Bill Binney total access to the NSA database , and have him run three counter-intelligence studies for the President , immediately .
We will not win the next war — whether conventional or unconventional .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic are not investigated , indicted , convicted , and executed , this is going to happen again , in August or September , this time for real , and this time we will not be able to recover .
To view the two hour seating of the Tribunal from which this extract is drawn with permission : https : //youtu.be/9ydnT7piObQ Individual remarks in the above video are personal — the Tribunal issues formal statements separately to place its official views before the public .

You cannot win a war against a real pandemic. The only way to defeat a biological attack is to identify and neutralize the people planning that attack, in advance. In my personal view, neither China nor Russia are waging biological war against the USA — this is a war by the Deep State and its agents including Bill Gates, George Soros, WHO and the CDC, and selected rogue elements of the US and UK intelligence communities. Of course it also helps to close down all your own bio-warfare facilities and work more closely with Russia, which is the top practitioner on the planet for energetics, gravitobiology, and scalar (time energy) warfare, all of which can contain and neturalize both biological and electromagnetic attacks.
At the same time, it is vital to note that it was the fear-mongering out of control media — and timid ignorant governments — that wrecked the global economy, not the flu. The time has come for an Open Source Agency and Web 3.0 and a new uncensored honest media and social media. The truth about everything is being repressed to the detriment of human health and prosperity and peace.
Former spy Robert David Steele, senior civilian founder of the US Marine Corps Intelligence Activity, recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2017, and the pro bono Chief Counsel of the International Tribunal for Natural Justice, puts it on the line: we need to give Bill Binney total access to the NSA database, and have him run three counter-intelligence studies for the President, immediately.
We will not win the next war — whether conventional or unconventional. If those who organized this first largely non-lethal pandemic are not investigated, indicted, convicted, and executed, this is going to happen again, in August or September, this time for real, and this time we will not be able to recover.
To view the two hour seating of the Tribunal from which this extract is drawn with permission: https://youtu.be/9ydnT7piObQ Individual remarks in the above video are personal — the Tribunal issues formal statements separately to place its official views before the public.
Robert David Steele is the conceptualizer of integrated election reform (#UNRIG) and the integration of holistic analytics, true cost economics, and Open Source Everything Engineering (OSEE) such that we can achieve a prosperous world at peace at 10-20% the cost of the failed Western economic model burdened by banks and lawyers. A former US spy and co-founder of the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity, he is today the Chief Enabling Officer (CeO) of Earth Intelligence Network, a 501c3, and now also CeO of Open Source Everything (OSE Inc.). He continues his education with non-fiction reading, posting over 2,000 reviews across 98 categories; his hobbies include off-shore sailing and racketball.