veteranstoday--2020-08-08--Peter Ford: Beirut, Calling out the cynical exploitation of the disaster

What if the US was opportunistically taking advantage of the Beirut explosion to create problems for Hizbollah and Iran ?
In the immediate aftermath of the explosion Trump quoted ‘ some of our great generals ’ as thinking it was ‘ a bomb of some kind ’ and described it as ‘ a terrible attack ’ .
Now what could possibly prompt the Pentagon and Trump to want the world to think that it was a bomb , which could only mean that Israel had mounted an attack ?
Well , how about a desire to create , as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has defiantly failed to toe every US line , and more ambitiously , to put pressure on Hizbollah to react against Israel ?
That Pentagon sources later disavowed having any evidence of there being an attack proves nothing .
We need to connect the dots .
In the same week that Trump made this odd Hizbollah-baiting claim he was appointing as special envoy for Iran the veteran arch-neocon , arch-Israel supporter Elliott Abrams .
This is a man notorious for his involvement in regime change operations in Latin America and the Middle East @ @ @ @ @ @ @ What could be more calculated to signal an intention to raise the temperature over Iran in the lead up to a November election where Trump ’ s chances of winning diminish by the day ?
And what better way to stoke a crisis than to manipulate Hizbollah into making an unwise move against Israel ?
Hizbollah has for a long time vowed to retaliate against any Israeli attack on itself .
While an Israeli attack on the port need not necessarily force Hizbollah to respond it would if the first triggering explosion was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speculated and not a stash of fireworks .
Social media speculation about an Israeli missile strike can only embarrass Hizbollah , either because its alleged arms store was an invitation to trouble or because it was failing to follow through on its vows of retaliation , undermining the credibility of its own deterrence .
A moment ’ s serious reflection , however , suffices to reassure us that this was in all probability no Israeli attack .
The rules of engagement between Hizbollah and Israel have held firm for fourteen years since a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2006 conflict .
Israel knows that any attack on Hizbollah will incur an at least proportionate response .
For Israel to upend fourteen years of successful deterrence just to take out a single Hizbollah arms store or even more improbably just for the hell of seeing Beirut burn stretches credence .
What does seem to be going on here , however , is an orchestrated attempt to take cynical advantage of the disaster .
We can see this in the use by Western media of talking points designed to highlight the corruption and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ultimate cause of not only the disaster but of all Lebanon ’ s woes , including the worst economic crisis in living memory and an uncertain response to the coronavirus epidemic .
The sub-text is that it is Hizbollah ’ s role in government which helps perpetuate the alleged corruption and incompetence , and that the Lebanese confessional system which permits Hizbollah to play this role must be reformed root and branch .
Any fair observer of the Lebanese scene , however , would acknowledge that despite the governing system ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ near miraculous recovery from fifteen years of civil war and devastation of its infrastructure by Israel in 2006 on a much greater scale than today ’ s , success in avoiding being sucked into the vortex of the Syrian conflict next door stoked by Western powers , notwithstanding its absorption of over a million refugees , and relative internal stability without repression on anything like the scale seen in Western Arab allies .
Those weeping crocodile tears for Lebanon today are the same people who cheered on the recently implemented ‘ Caesar Act @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Syria , provoked a stampede on Lebanese banks , sending the economic crisis in Lebanon over the edge .
The enemies of stability in the Levant have many weapons to call on .
It will be unwise to allow them to direct through psy- ops the political and information aftershocks from the explosion .

Ambassador Peter Ford for VT …London
What if the US was opportunistically taking advantage of the Beirut explosion to create problems for Hizbollah and Iran?
In the immediate aftermath of the explosion Trump quoted ‘some of our great generals’ as thinking it was ‘a bomb of some kind’ and described it as ‘a terrible attack’. Now what could possibly prompt the Pentagon and Trump to want the world to think that it was a bomb, which could only mean that Israel had mounted an attack?
Well, how about a desire to create, as a minimum, confusion in a country which has defiantly failed to toe every US line, and more ambitiously, to put pressure on Hizbollah to react against Israel? That Pentagon sources later disavowed having any evidence of there being an attack proves nothing.
We need to connect the dots. In the same week that Trump made this odd Hizbollah-baiting claim he was appointing as special envoy for Iran the veteran arch-neocon, arch-Israel supporter Elliott Abrams. This is a man notorious for his involvement in regime change operations in Latin America and the Middle East and for his hatred of Iran. What could be more calculated to signal an intention to raise the temperature over Iran in the lead up to a November election where Trump’s chances of winning diminish by the day? And what better way to stoke a crisis than to manipulate Hizbollah into making an unwise move against Israel?
Hizbollah has for a long time vowed to retaliate against any Israeli attack on itself. While an Israeli attack on the port need not necessarily force Hizbollah to respond it would if the first triggering explosion was a Hizbollah arms store as some have speculated and not a stash of fireworks.
Social media speculation about an Israeli missile strike can only embarrass Hizbollah, either because its alleged arms store was an invitation to trouble or because it was failing to follow through on its vows of retaliation, undermining the credibility of its own deterrence.
A moment’s serious reflection, however, suffices to reassure us that this was in all probability no Israeli attack.
The rules of engagement between Hizbollah and Israel have held firm for fourteen years since a balance of deterrence was established after the 2006 conflict. Israel knows that any attack on Hizbollah will incur an at least proportionate response. For Israel to upend fourteen years of successful deterrence just to take out a single Hizbollah arms store or even more improbably just for the hell of seeing Beirut burn stretches credence.
What does seem to be going on here, however, is an orchestrated attempt to take cynical advantage of the disaster. We can see this in the use by Western media of talking points designed to highlight the corruption and incompetence of the Lebanese government as being the ultimate cause of not only the disaster but of all Lebanon’s woes, including the worst economic crisis in living memory and an uncertain response to the coronavirus epidemic.
The sub-text is that it is Hizbollah’s role in government which helps perpetuate the alleged corruption and incompetence, and that the Lebanese confessional system which permits Hizbollah to play this role must be reformed root and branch.
Any fair observer of the Lebanese scene, however, would acknowledge that despite the governing system’s undisputed failings the country has witnessed a near miraculous recovery from fifteen years of civil war and devastation of its infrastructure by Israel in 2006 on a much greater scale than today’s, success in avoiding being sucked into the vortex of the Syrian conflict next door stoked by Western powers, notwithstanding its absorption of over a million refugees, and relative internal stability without repression on anything like the scale seen in Western Arab allies.
Those weeping crocodile tears for Lebanon today are the same people who cheered on the recently implemented ‘Caesar Act’ which, in imposing fresh sanctions on Syria, provoked a stampede on Lebanese banks, sending the economic crisis in Lebanon over the edge.
The enemies of stability in the Levant have many weapons to call on. It will be unwise to allow them to direct through psy- ops the political and information aftershocks from the explosion.


veteranstoday--2020-08-08--The History of Nuclear Weapons Design 1945-2015 (Banned by National Security Letter-Ignored by VT)

In the minds of most people , a nuclear weapon is a large device carried on the tip of an ICBM or carried in the belly of a huge bomber aircraft that when deployed produces a colossal explosion and spectacular mushroom cloud just like all those terrifying 1950s newsreels .
However , this is no longer the case – nuclear weapon design is several generations in advance of the bulky devices of the Cold War and today , a wide variety of types of nuclear weapon exist and they come in all sizes from the smallest ‘ micro nukes ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of TNT equivalent up to truly monstrous two and three stage bombs with yields of many millions of tonnes of TNT ( megatonnes ) .
Are lies censored ?
You can only see VT videos , when recorded off a computer screen : The megatonne class bombs have never been deployed in anger ; if they had , there would be no possible way to keep it a secret – the devastation and fallout would be on such a grand scale as to be impossible to hide .
However , the sub-kilotonne mini @ @ @ @ @ @ @ times , both in false flag ‘ terrorist ’ attacks like 9-11 and OK City and in military conflicts in countries such as Iraq , Syria and Yemen .
The small yield and limited destruction of these mini and micro nukes means it is possible to keep their use secret ; especially when the media are compliant and willfully ignore any and all instances of their use .
The willingness of several players to use these diabolical weapons should send a chill down the spine of every sensible person – we are living @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dangerous and deadly than the previous Cold War era with it ’ s balance of nuclear power held in check by the terrifying concept of Mutually Assured Destruction .
Now that advanced nuclear weapons have become part of the playbook of modern conflict it becomes important to understand something about these weapons ; to learn how their characteristics and effects so that it becomes ever harder to keep their use secret .
In the original first generation solid core fission device , developed during World War 2 and known as ‘ Fatman ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compressed to less than 75 % of its original size in order to create a critical mass .
In this 70 year old design , the fission process was bound by the use of high yield explosive compression..
This first atomic weapon used about 5,000 lbs of explosives and 32 shaped charges to shock compress about 10 KG of plutonium from its molecular delta state into its alpha state , massively increasing its density per cubic centimetre .
By doing so it created a neutron means free path of about 35 centimetres or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to just hold it all together long enough in time to produce about 80 to 100 generations of neutron multiplications .
Thus forming a super critical mass that produced an estimated yield of about 15 to 20 KT of TNT .
35 centimetres or about 14 inches is the average distance traveled by a free neutron before it strikes another atom of plutonium and splits it , causing a nuclear chain reaction to occur .
The distance traveled by a neutron , along with the time required to travel this distance ( also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ key to forming a critical mass in any fissile material .
If the assembly time is to slow or not enough neutrons are generated in time , the weapon will fizzle producing a much lower yield .
Usually at about 5 KT .
Verified by testing during the 1950 ’ s .
However if it gets past the first 56 neutron generations it will still go bang , and if it reaches about 80 neutron generations it will explode at full yield .
Any new neutron generations added above the first 80 generations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the core occurs ) , will simply add to the efficiency and yield of the device .
All of this activity takes place in less than a few microseconds and the neutron chain reaction producing the explosion is over before you see the first flash of light .
The high temperature plasma fire ball and shock wave that is created during the explosion is simply the remnants of unburned fissile material and its isotopes produced during the fissioning of the uranium or plutonium atoms rapidly undergoing thermal expansion in the atmosphere until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of hot gases forms the classical mushroom cloud .
The ratio of nuclear fissile material that is required to produce a certain blast size is based on a ratio of about 1 KG of PU 239 per 1 to 2 kilotons of explosive power depending on implosion efficiency .
As the compression of the fissile material is increased , the amount of fuel required to create a critical mass is reduced .
Using a neutron tamper and reflector will also help reduce the size by up to half .
Currently a compression level @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the maximum amount that can be achieved with current explosive technology .
This is enough to reduce the critical mass to about 2.5 kilograms with a lower maximum explosive yield of about 2 to 5 kilotons in size .
If a proper neutron moderator is used , lower values can be achieved resulting in a much smaller blast , but a much longer fireball burn time .
The minimum tested amount was publicly set at about 800 grams or about 1 lb of PU239 , producing a yield between 10 and 100 tons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back in 1958 , and it was designed by the physicist Ted Taylor .
It became the W-58 weapon series of small artillery shell weapons .
In the original WW2 fatman weapon design , about 10 KG of plutonium was used , and only about one to two kilograms of PU was fissioned off before final dissemble of the nuclear core occurred .
The other 80 to 90 % of the un-fissioned material wound up being fallout .
Solid core fission devices are very inefficient due to the fact that about 90 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a neutron multiplier , and it is only the last 10 to 20 % of the outer nuclear core that produced the explosive blast effect .
This is why solid core nuclear weapons are no longer used .
They are extremely inefficient .
They are very large and bulky in size and they require a sophisticated multipoint , electronically controlled , shape charge , implosion system to function properly and they create large amounts of fallout .
Even thou there were no civilian personnel immediately killed by fallout at Hiroshima and Nagasaki @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that all casualties were caused by prompt radiation exposure from the original blast and follow on radiation poisoning .
Solid core implosion systems using pu-239 also require an inherently fast assembly time due to prompt radiation problems with pu-240 impurities contained within the plutonium fuel .
This problem gets worse as the plutonium ages , eventually forcing the retirement of the nuclear pit or core .
This is why we now have over 6,000 surplus plutonium pits held in surplus cold storage .
After about 16 to 32 years , the pit has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a costly and toxic process .
So it was deemed to be cheaper and easier to just keep making new pits and worry about recycling the older junk warheads later .
However with U-235 uranium-based weapons and hollow core boosted fission fusion weapons , you do not have this problem .
This is why all modern nuclear weapon designs since about 1960 use this newer third generation process .
First off U-235 based weapons do not have an aging problem ; they are good for over 100 years and then some .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more expensive and toxic plutonium route was simply because at the time back in 1945 they could produce 4 times more PU-239 than they could produce enriched U-235 uranium , meaning more bombs faster .
The WW2 plutonium production rate after January of 1945 , was set at 1 bomb per every 10 days of reactor operation , versus 1 bomb every 30 to 45 days with enriched uranium production .
If Japan had not surrendered , they were going to drop one bomb on Japan every two weeks until there was no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , cheaper and more easily produced uranium-based weapons that required no reactors whatsoever to produce , it was too little too late .
Plutonium won the weapons race , and this remained the case all the way through the Cold War with Russia and China .
Now 70 years later , someone has to clean up the mess that Oppenheimer , Teller and Groves made .
Fortunately for them and probably for us , they are long gone , so they don ’ t have to clean up the mess that they made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tons of enriched u-235 uranium that is good for 100 years more as weapons grade fuel , plus more than another 100 tons of weapons grade plutonium pu-239 sitting in cold storage just rotting away and radioactive for another 10,000 years .
Fortunately someone sane recognized this and finally stopped production of replacement weapons grade fuel by shutting down all of the production reactors that made this stuff .
6,000 surplus warheads is more than enough .
The hollow core pit design and third generation weapons Second generation nuclear weapons were the so-called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s and 60 ’ s deemed obsolescent by better and more accurate missile guidance systems , multiple reentry vehicles and newer miniaturization technologies that came on line .
Third generation weapons were the miniaturized designs using hollow core and boosted fission technology during the 60 ’ s and 70 ’ s allowing for much lower yield weapons and the so called “ Dial-A- Yield ” designs .
Fourth generation nuclear weapons were produced during the Reagan Star Wars program of the 1980 ’ s thanks to Mr. Teller and were basically what is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enhanced energy ” weapons “ neutron , X-ray , Gamma-ray , EMP ” bombs , including super lasers .
Fortunately , none of it ever worked as sold , but it did vastly increase our technological knowledge and that has now lead to the creation of the latest fifth generation weapons , which are still clouded in much secrecy .
As far back as the mid 1950 ’ s , work began on the first levitated pit designs that placed an air cushion between the inner and outer core of a single stage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ core doubled the shock wave velocity of compression allowing for a bigger bang for your buck .
Forty plus kiloton weapons could now be made with simple , single-stage implosion designs , doubling existing yields .
As ICBM ’ s took over the job from the B-52 and the air dropped weapons which were being deployed at the time , miniaturization of nuclear weaponry rapidly kicked in .
Two techniques for nuclear miniaturization were devised .
The first simply just shot two slugs of uranium U-235 into a neutron rich target called an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two subcritical masses of uranium collided with the neutron rich urchin and axially compressed by explosives a critical mass was formed and bang .
This reduced the size of a uranium based gun implosion weapon system from 10 feet down to 3 feet and only 18 inches in diameter .
It was sweet , safe , simple and very reliable .
It also reduced the weight from 5,000 lbs to less than 1,000 lbs .
A big deal back then .
An entire series of primary fission weapons have since been based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ series still used today .
By simply varying the implosion velocity the yield of the weapon could be changed to a lower number .
This was an early “ dial a yield ” design .
Later after many tests it was determined that the amount of fissile material could be reduced to a very small amount and the design would still work .
This was the basis of the first mini or micro nuke designs of the 1960 ’ s and 70 ’ s mainly used at the time as first stage nuclear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
After the levitated pit and “ two point ” uranium gun based implosion systems were worked out in the late 1950 ’ s more advanced two point and even single point plutonium based spherical implosion systems were invented .
These systems basically used the inside out principle of the original H bomb design .
By simply filling a hollow core spear made of fissionable material either uranium or plutonium with a neutron based boost gas such as deuterium or a solid such as lithium-6 that turns into deuterium when properly compressed , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ design or weapon .
This opened Pandora ’ s box for all current miniaturized nuclear weapon designs since then and in the future .
It also eliminated the minimum critical mass problem with older WW2 era solid core plutonium pit designs and pre detonation timing problems .
32 point compression was now down to two or even single point compression making weapons designs so small that they could fit in a 155 mm artillery shell .
The average size of a nuclear primary is now down to less than 6 X 12 inches @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as .05 kilotons .
W-48 , W-58 , B-61 etc .
That ’ s equal to about 50 tons of TNT , but large enough to set off a fusion secondary of a much greater size if needed .
look it up on Wikipedia if you don ’ t believe me .
Due to the newer inside out boosted gas compression systems coming on line in the 1970 ’ s , a much environmentally cleaner ( or greener ) burning weapon came into being with fallout issues becoming almost nil .
These newer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hollow core boasted weapons designs produce very little fallout , if any at all , due to the fusion process consuming almost all of the fissile material during detonation .
Low end yields of very high efficiency can be easily created with no minimal critical mass problems to overcome .
Their efficiency is so high that they only require one tenth the amount of fissile material that previous designs needed .
Even lower grade blends of non weapons grade plutonium ( less than 92 % pure ) will work just fine .
So @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and a uranium or plutonium chemical separation program could easily make them .
IE North Korea , Iran , Germany , Japan etc .
Hydrodynamic implosion testing is minimal in very small devices such as this in order to get one to work .
The only hard part is the metallurgy and the chemical separation process .
The so called “ Blogging Wars ” or debate on the internet as to whether or not these newer 5th generation “ subcritical burn ” nuclear weapons exist or not is a touchy issue to deal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proof as to their existence and vicious debate in the alternative media about them being recently used in the middle east , Yemen , Ukraine and most recently in China , it ’ s hard to prove either way .
The key argument by the “ Nay-Sayers ” and the “ Grammar Nazis ” is the lack of fallout .
This can be explained .
In the older first generation weapons systems dating back over 70 years ago to the WW2 era , only 10 % of the fissile material was consumed in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being left over as fallout .
They were very dirty weapons as compared to today .
This is the concept that has set into the public ’ s mind ever since .
The 90 % of unburned fuel was simply used by the weapon as a neutron amplifier or multiple and nothing else .
It added very little to the total explosive yield .
Only the outer 10 % of fissile material was actually used to make the explosion .
This is why they were so dirty .
In the newest 5th generation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been drastically reduced by as much as 90 % only leaving enough fissile material needed to ignite and trigger the internal fission-fusion-fission reaction of the deuterium boost gas .
In this process , almost all of the fissile material is totally consumed , producing almost no detectable traces of fallout , as compared to the older designs from the WW2 era .
Due to this advantage in “ nuclear stealth technology ” , almost any large scale explosion greater than 10 tons or more in TNT explosive power can now very easy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Remember , any explosion that leaves a crater greater than 6-feet wide or deep requires a molecular mass explosion of TNT that is greater than 4,000 lbs in weight or two tons of explosives .
Most cars , small trucks or jet fighters can not carry a weapon any larger than this in explosive power .
So unless you have a B-52 or a B-1 or a B-2 , forget it .
It has to be a mini-nuke until proven otherwise .
Just because there is no fallout doesn ’ t mean @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or a micro nuke .
Look at the blast photos .
A picture is worth a thousand words .
Was there a bright instantaneous flash ?
Was it a single point or multipoint blast ?
Was there hydrocarbon residue left behind ?
Were secondary explosions involved ?
Was there evidence of very high temperatures and massive thermal damage involved ?
Was there incinerated or missing bodies involved ?
Was there an earthquake with a rapid unnatural spike registered on the seismometers ?
The list just goes on and on as to what to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ look for .
Glasstone ’ s 1958 book “ The effects of nuclear weapons ” is a start for those who really want to know , but it is over 55 years old and it has not been updated to cover anything new since solid core weapons designs were invented 70 years ago .
There is no new “ bible ” on the newer weapons designs that is still not classified for a reason .
They don ’ t want you to really know .
So the “ Nay-Sayers ” base there arguments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to how nuclear weapons use to work back in 1945 .
Well we have come a long way since then baby .
Allegedly we even landed on the moon ?
Nuclear Bunker Busters and how they really work Any nuclear blast can be shaped or modified in the type of energy it releases .
Either as Heat , Blast effect , X-rays , Gamma-Rays , EMP pulse or just pure neutrons etc .
Any of this radiation can be directed in any direction or none at all .
This was the basis of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , exotic nuclear weapons and super Lasers at work .
A nuclear blast can be directed in any direction acting as a nuclear shape charge , and it can be focused just like using a standard molecular anti-tank TNT based shape charge .
A 1 kiloton B-61-11 nuclear bunker-buster will blast ( melt ) a hole 10-feet wide and over 1,000 feet long into solid granite .
Larger versions will make even a bigger hole in the ground .
They do not bury themselves into the bedrock and make a big crater .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ how they work .
They melt the bedrock with a nuclear thermal plasma jet that is over 1 million degrees in temperature .
When this hot plasma hits the underground command center or bunker , everybody inside the bunker will be instantaneously vaporized from the plasma jet .
With higher yield B-61 weapons , any bunker that is less than 3,000 feet deep can be hit .
This includes NORAD in Denver Colorado , etc .
No modern underground bunker complex less than 3,000 feet deep can survive a hit from one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were conducted as far back as the early 1960 ’ s in the Nevada proving ground , and were covered up as simple underground tests .
For further info on how these newer weapons work ; see Nuclear physicist Ted Taylor ’ s book “ The Curve of Binding Energy ” by John McPhee , first printed in 1974 .
It covers in greater depth as to how these newer weapons work and how they were used on 911 to take down the World Trade Center .
Ted wrote this prediction of their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Japan way back in 1974 .
He states that a single directed-energy nuclear weapon ( a small bunker-buster ) placed in the lower basement of the central core elevator shaft area of the twin towers , as small as 1KT , producing a nuclear plasma jet , directed upwards 1,000 feet with no blast effects detected from the outside of the building , and that this plasma jet would vaporize and melt the entire central core of the building dropping it into the ground .
As seen on 9-11 .
Remember this prediction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ generation weapon designs are the anarchist “ 21st century ” favorite toys of mass destruction .
By covertly hiding their existence away from the general public and secretly using them in stealthy nuclear-based guerrilla warfare attacks on undesirable persons , governments or countries — such as the Saudi ’ s use of a small tactical nuke on Yemen or most recently in China — with these new weapons of “ very small ” mass destruction ( tiny nukes for tiny minds ) , no non-nuclear possessing government can properly defend itself from this @ @ @ @ @ @ @

by Ian Greenhalgh with Jeff Smith
In the last year we have covered a number of incidents where nuclear weapons have been used; from exposing the truth about the nuclear nature of the destruction of the WTC on 9-11 to being the only media outlet to cover the nuclear explosions in China.
In the minds of most people, a nuclear weapon is a large device carried on the tip of an ICBM or carried in the belly of a huge bomber aircraft that when deployed produces a colossal explosion and spectacular mushroom cloud just like all those terrifying 1950s newsreels.
However, this is no longer the case – nuclear weapon design is several generations in advance of the bulky devices of the Cold War and today, a wide variety of types of nuclear weapon exist and they come in all sizes from the smallest ‘micro nukes’ with yields measuring in hundreds of tonnes of TNT equivalent up to truly monstrous two and three-stage bombs with yields of many millions of tonnes of TNT (megatonnes).
Are lies censored? You can only see VT videos when recorded off a computer screen:
The megatonne class bombs have never been deployed in anger; if they had, there would be no possible way to keep it a secret – the devastation and fallout would be on such a grand scale as to be impossible to hide. However, the sub-kilotonne mini and micro nukes have been used many times, both in false flag ‘terrorist’ attacks like 9-11 and OK City and in military conflicts in countries such as Iraq, Syria and Yemen.
The small yield and limited destruction of these mini and micro nukes means it is possible to keep their use secret; especially when the media are compliant and willfully ignore any and all instances of their use. The willingness of several players to use these diabolical weapons should send a chill down the spine of every sensible person – we are living in a new nuclear age far more dangerous and deadly than the previous Cold War-era with its balance of nuclear power held in check by the terrifying concept of Mutually Assured Destruction.
Now that advanced nuclear weapons have become part of the playbook of modern conflict it becomes important to understand something about these weapons; to learn how their characteristics and effects so that it becomes even harder to keep their use secret.
In the original first-generation solid core fission device, developed during World War 2 and known as ‘Fatman’; a solid core plutonium pit was compressed to less than 75% of its original size in order to create a critical mass. In this 70-year-old design, the fission process was bound by the use of high yield explosive compression.
This first atomic weapon used about 5,000 lbs of explosives and 32 shaped charges to shock compress about 10 KG of plutonium from its molecular delta state into its alpha state, massively increasing its density per cubic centimeter.
By doing so it created a neutron means a free path of about 35 centimeters or less in length and it was able to just hold it all together long enough in time to produce about 80 to 100 generations of neutron multiplications. Thus forming a super critical mass that produced an estimated yield of about 15 to 20 KT of TNT.
35 centimetres or about 14 inches is the average distance traveled by a free neutron before it strikes another atom of plutonium and splits it, causing a nuclear chain reaction to occur. The distance traveled by a neutron, along with the time required to travel this distance (also called the assembly time) is the key to forming a critical mass in any fissile material.
If the assembly time is to slow or not enough neutrons are generated in time, the weapon will fizzle producing a much lower yield. Usually at about 5 KT. Verified by testing during the 1950’s.
However if it gets past the first 56 neutron generations it will still go bang, and if it reaches about 80 neutron generations it will explode at full yield. Any new neutron generations added above the first 80 generations, (that occur before final disassemble of the core occurs), will simply add to the efficiency and yield of the device. All of this activity takes place in less than a few microseconds and the neutron chain reaction producing the explosion is over before you see the first flash of light.
The high-temperature plasma fireball and shock wave that is created during the explosion is simply the remnants of unburned fissile material and its isotopes produced during the fissioning of the uranium or plutonium atoms rapidly undergoing thermal expansion in the atmosphere until cooled. This thermal expansion and cooling of hot gases form the classical mushroom cloud.
The ratio of nuclear fissile material that is required to produce a certain blast size is based on a ratio of about 1 KG of PU 239 per 1 to 2 kilotons of explosive power depending on implosion efficiency. As the compression of the fissile material is increased, the amount of fuel required to create a critical mass is reduced. Using a neutron tamper and reflector will also help reduce the size by up to half.
Currently, a compression level of up to 4 to 1 is the maximum amount that can be achieved with current explosive technology. This is enough to reduce the critical mass to about 2.5 kilograms with a lower maximum explosive yield of about 2 to 5 kilotons in size.
If a proper neutron moderator is used, lower values can be achieved resulting in a much smaller blast, but a much longer fireball burn time. The minimum tested amount was publicly set at about 800 grams or about 1 lb of PU239, producing a yield between 10 and 100 tons of explosive force. This was done back in 1958, and it was designed by the physicist Ted Taylor. It became the W-58 weapon series of small artillery shell weapons.
In the original WW2 Fatman weapon design, about 10 KG of plutonium was used, and only about one to two kilograms of PU was fissioned off before the final dissemble of the nuclear core occurred. The other 80 to 90% of the un-fissioned material wound up being fallout.
Solid core fission devices are very inefficient due to the fact that about 90% of the fissionable material is only used as a neutron multiplier, and it is only the last 10 to 20% of the outer nuclear core that produced the explosive blast effect.
This is why solid core nuclear weapons are no longer used. They are extremely inefficient. They are very large and bulky in size and they require a sophisticated multipoint, electronically controlled, shape charge, implosion system to function properly and they create large amounts of fallout.
Even thou there were no civilian personnel immediately killed by fallout at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, this was due to the fact that all casualties were caused by prompt radiation exposure from the original blast and follow on radiation poisoning.
Solid core implosion systems using pu-239 also require an inherently fast assembly time due to prompt radiation problems with pu-240 impurities contained within the plutonium fuel. This problem gets worse as the plutonium ages, eventually forcing the retirement of the nuclear pit or core. This is why we now have over 6,000 surplus plutonium pits held in surplus cold storage.
After about 16 to 32 years, the pit has to be remanufactured, and it is a costly and toxic process. So it was deemed to be cheaper and easier to just keep making new pits and worry about recycling the older junk warheads later. However with U-235 uranium-based weapons and hollow-core boosted fission-fusion weapons, you do not have this problem. This is why all modern nuclear weapon designs since about 1960 use this newer third-generation process.
First off U-235 based weapons do not have an aging problem; they are good for over 100 years and then some. The only reason why they chose the much more expensive and toxic plutonium route was simply that at the time back in 1945 they could produce 4 times more PU-239 than they could produce enriched U-235 uranium, meaning more bombs faster. The WW2 plutonium production rate after January of 1945, was set at 1 bomb per every 10 days of reactor operation, versus 1 bomb every 30 to 45 days with enriched uranium production.
If Japan had not surrendered, they were going to drop one bomb on Japan every two weeks until there was no Japan left. However, with the smaller, cheaper, and more easily produced uranium-based weapons that required no reactors whatsoever to produce, it was too little too late. Plutonium won the weapons race, and this remained the case all the way through the Cold War with Russia and China.
Now 70 years later, someone has to clean up the mess that Oppenheimer, Teller and Groves made. Fortunately for them and probably for us, they are long gone, so they don’t have to clean up the mess that they made. The US alone has over 100 tons of enriched u-235 uranium that is good for 100 years more as weapons-grade fuel, plus more than another 100 tons of weapons-grade plutonium pu-239 sitting in cold storage just rotting away and radioactive for another 10,000 years.
Fortunately someone sane recognized this and finally stopped production of replacement weapons-grade fuel by shutting down all of the production reactors that made this stuff. 6,000 surplus warheads is more than enough.
The hollow core pit design and third generation weapons
Second generation nuclear weapons were the so-called massive hydrogen bombs of the ’50s and 60’s deemed obsolescent by better and more accurate missile guidance systems, multiple reentry vehicles and newer miniaturization technologies that came online. Third generation weapons were the miniaturized designs using hollow-core and boosted fission technology during the 60’s and 70’s allowing for much lower yield weapons and the so-called “Dial-A- Yield” designs.
Fourth-generation nuclear weapons were produced during the Reagan Star Wars program of the 1980’s thanks to Mr. Teller and were basically what is called “directed energy” or “enhanced energy” weapons “neutron, X-ray, Gamma-ray, EMP” bombs, including super lasers. Fortunately, none of it ever worked as sold, but it did vastly increase our technological knowledge and that has now lead to the creation of the latest fifth-generation weapons, which are still clouded in much secrecy.
As far back as the mid-1950s, work began on the first levitated pit designs that placed an air cushion between the inner and outer core of a single-stage plutonium-based implosion design. This air-core doubled the shock wave velocity of compression allowing for a bigger bang for your buck. Forty-plus kiloton weapons could now be made with simple, single-stage implosion designs, doubling existing yields. As ICBM’s took over the job from the B-52 and the airdropped weapons which were being deployed at the time, miniaturization of nuclear weaponry rapidly kicked in.
Two techniques for nuclear miniaturization were devised. The first simply just shot two slugs of uranium U-235 into a neutron-rich target called an urchin or neutron generator. When the two subcritical masses of uranium collided with the neutron-rich urchin and axially compressed by explosives a critical mass was formed and bang.
This reduced the size of a uranium-based gun implosion weapon system from 10 feet down to 3 feet and only 18 inches in diameter. It was sweet, safe, simple, and very reliable. It also reduced the weight from 5,000 lbs to less than 1,000 lbs. A big deal back then.
An entire series of primary fission weapons have since been based on this basic design, including the B-61 series still used today. By simply varying the implosion velocity the yield of the weapon could be changed to a lower number. This was an early “dial a yield” design.
Later after many tests, it was determined that the amount of fissile material could be reduced to a very small amount and the design would still work. This was the basis of the first mini or micro nuke designs of the 1960s and ’70s mainly used at the time as first stage nuclear triggers for much larger hydrogen bomb designs.
Boosted fission
After the levitated pit and “two-point” uranium, gun-based implosion systems were worked out in the late 1950s more advanced two-point and even single point plutonium-based spherical implosion systems were invented. These systems basically used the inside out principle of the original H bomb design.
By simply filling a hollow core spear made of fissionable material either uranium or plutonium with a neutron based boost gas such as deuterium or a solid such as lithium-6 that turns into deuterium when properly compressed, you get a miniaturized hydrogen fusion-fission-fusion bomb design or weapon.
This opened Pandora’s box for all current miniaturized nuclear weapon designs since then and in the future. It also eliminated the minimum critical mass problem with the older WW2 era solid core plutonium pit designs and pre-detonation timing problems. 32 point compression was now down to two or even single point compression making weapons designs so small that they could fit in a 155 mm artillery shell.
The average size of a nuclear primary is now down to less than 6 X 12 inches or less with verified yields as low as .05 kilotons. W-48, W-58, B-61 etc. That’s equal to about 50 tons of TNT, but large enough to set off a fusion secondary of a much greater size if needed. look it up on Wikipedia if you don’t believe me.
Due to the newer inside out boosted gas compression systems coming online in the 1970s, a much environmentally cleaner (or greener) burning weapon came into being with fallout issues becoming almost nil. These newer 3rd, 4th, and 5th generation hollow-core boasted weapons designs produce very little fallout, if any at all, due to the fusion process consuming almost all of the fissile material during detonation. Low-end yields of very high efficiency can be easily created with no minimal critical mass problems to overcome.
Their efficiency is so high that they only require one-tenth of the amount of fissile material that previous designs needed. Even lower grade blends of nonweapons grade plutonium (less than 92% pure) will work just fine. So any nation with a nuclear power reactor and a uranium or plutonium chemical separation program could easily make them. IE North Korea, Iran, Germany, Japan etc. Hydrodynamic implosion testing is minimal in very small devices such as this in order to get one to work. The only hard part is the metallurgy and the chemical separation process.
Mini and micro nukes – science fiction or science fact
The so-called “Blogging Wars” or debate on the internet as to whether or not these newer 5th generation “subcritical burn” nuclear weapons exist or not is a touchy issue to deal with. Since there is no physical proof as to their existence and vicious debate in the alternative media about them being recently used in the middle east, Yemen, Ukraine and most recently in China, it’s hard to prove either way. The key argument by the “Nay-Sayers” and the “Grammar Nazis” is the lack of fallout. This can be explained.
In the older first-generation weapons systems dating back over 70 years ago to the WW2 era, only 10% of the fissile material was consumed in the original explosion with over 90% being leftover as fallout. They were very dirty weapons as compared to today. This is the concept that has set into the public’s mind ever since.
The 90% of unburned fuel was simply used by the weapon as a neutron amplifier or multiple and nothing else. It added very little to the total explosive yield. Only the outer 10% of fissile material was actually used to make the explosion. This is why they were so dirty.
In the newest 5th generation devices the uranium or plutonium fissile content has been drastically reduced by as much as 90% only leaving enough fissile material needed to ignite and trigger the internal fission-fusion-fission reaction of the deuterium boost gas. In this process, almost all of the fissile material is totally consumed, producing almost no detectable traces of fallout, as compared to the older designs from the WW2 era.
Due to this advantage in “nuclear stealth technology”, almost any large scale explosion greater than 10 tons or more in TNT explosive power can now very easy be passed off as a conventional explosion. Remember, any explosion that leaves a crater greater than 6-feet wide or deep requires a molecular mass explosion of TNT that is greater than 4,000 lbs in weight or two tons of explosives. Most cars, small trucks or jet fighters cannot carry a weapon any larger than this in explosive power.
So unless you have a B-52 or a B-1 or a B-2, forget it. It has to be a mini-nuke until proven otherwise. Just because there is no fallout doesn’t mean that it wasn’t a mini or a micro nuke. Look at the blast photos. A picture is worth a thousand words. Was there a bright instantaneous flash?
Was it a single point or multipoint blast? Was there hydrocarbon residue left behind? Were secondary explosions involved? Was there evidence of very high temperatures and massive thermal damage involved? Were there incinerated or missing bodies involved? Was there an earthquake with a rapid unnatural spike registered on the seismometers?
The list just goes on and on as to what to look for if you know what to look for. Glasstone’s 1958 book “The effects of nuclear weapons” is a start for those who really want to know, but it is over 55 years old and it has not been updated to cover anything new since solid core weapons designs were invented 70 years ago. There is no new “bible” on the newer weapons designs that is still not classified for a reason. They don’t want you to really know.
So the “Nay-Sayers” base their arguments on outdated 70-year-old information as to how nuclear weapons use to work back in 1945. Well, we have come a long way since then baby. Allegedly we even landed on the moon?
Nuclear Bunker Busters and how they really work
Any nuclear blast can be shaped or modified in the type of energy it releases. Either as Heat, Blast effect, X-rays, Gamma-Rays, EMP pulse, or just pure neutrons, etc. Any of this radiation can be directed in any direction or none at all. This was the basis of the 1980’s Star Wars program, exotic nuclear weapons, and super Lasers at work.
A nuclear blast can be directed in any direction acting as a nuclear shape charge, and it can be focused just like using a standard molecular anti-tank TNT based shape charge. A 1 kiloton B-61-11 nuclear bunker-buster will blast (melt) a hole 10-feet wide and over 1,000 feet long into solid granite. Larger versions will make even a bigger hole in the ground. They do not bury themselves into the bedrock and make a big crater. This is a common public misnomer on how they work.
They melt the bedrock with a nuclear thermal plasma jet that is over 1 million degrees in temperature. When this hot plasma hits the underground command center or bunker, everybody inside the bunker will be instantaneously vaporized from the plasma jet. With higher yield B-61 weapons, any bunker that is less than 3,000 feet deep can be hit. This includes NORAD in Denver Colorado, etc.
No modern underground bunker complex less than 3,000 feet deep can survive a hit from one of these new bunker busters. These tests were conducted as far back as the early 1960s in Nevada proving ground and were covered up as simple underground tests.
For further info on how these newer weapons work; see Nuclear physicist Ted Taylor’s book “The Curve of Binding Energy” by John McPhee, first printed in 1974. It covers in greater depth as to how these newer weapons work and how they were used on 911 to take down the World Trade Center.
Ted wrote this prediction of their use on the WTC and in Fukushima Japan way back in 1974. He states that a single directed-energy nuclear weapon (a small bunker-buster) placed in the lower basement of the central core elevator shaft area of the twin towers, as small as 1KT, producing a nuclear plasma jet, directed upwards 1,000 feet with no blast effects detected from the outside of the building and that this plasma jet would vaporize and melt the entire central core of the building dropping it into the ground.
As seen on 9-11.
Remember this prediction was in 1974.
These newer 5th generation weapon designs are the anarchist “21st century” favorite toys of mass destruction. By covertly hiding their existence away from the general public and secretly using them in stealthy nuclear-based guerrilla warfare attacks on undesirable persons, governments or countries — such as the Saudi’s use of a small tactical nuke on Yemen or most recently in China — with these new weapons of “very small” mass destruction (tiny nukes for tiny minds), no non-nuclear possessing government can properly defend itself from this form of covert state-sponsored guerrilla warfare.
The real issue is not “whether or not they do exist”, but who is really using them against whom, and why?
9-11 Syllabus and VT Nuclear Education Series – 2015 VT Nuclear Education: The History of Nuclear Weapons Design 1945 to 2015 VT Nuclear Education: The Uranium Hydride Bomb VT Nuclear Education: Subcritical and microfission explosives VT Nuclear Education – Freon and the Hohlraum The Secret Nazi role in Building the Atomic Bomb How the Nazi A-Bomb Worked VT Nuclear Education: Critical Mass VT Nuclear Education: Laser and Nuke Weapon Calculator VT Nuclear Education: Germany 9/11 Science: Craters and Explosive Damage Neutron Bombs and Other Toys NEO: Building Nuclear Case Against Saudis VT Nuclear Education: The Secrets of EMP Weapons VT Nuclear Education: Explosive Properties of Reactor Grade Plutonium Nukes on Yemen, Confirming Proofs: Yield Estimation from Illumination Time Nukes on Yemen, Confirming Proofs: Introduction to Nuclear Operations Nukes on Yemen-Confirming Proofs: Calculating Nuclear Blast Yield from the Flash How Israel Was Busted Nuking Yemen Saudis Have Israel Nuke Yemen for Them VT Warning of EMP Plot Confirmed by Guardian VT Nuke Education: Thorium Warnings VT Nuclear Education: CIA/Iran Trial and more disclosure NEO – CIA Torture Report Ties Cheney/Bout to 9/11 Nukes The DOE Defends Nuclear 9/11 ______________ 9-11 Syllabus and VT Nuclear Education Series – 2014 Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed 9/11 NUKE DEMOLITION PROOF: Firefighters Radiation Cancers “Off the Scale” Doc Submitted By Russian Intel Constructing the Nuclear Child VT Nuclear Education Series Nuclear Education Series: Dimona Classified VT Nuclear Terrorism Education Series VT Nuclear Education: Undeniable Proof of 9/11 as a Nuclear Event VT Nuclear Education: As the Hammer Drops VT Nuclear Education: Mossad/N. Korea Links, MOX Nuclear Roundtable: America’s Nuclear Arsenal Officials Cite “Thermo-Nuke” in 9/11 Demo VT Nuclear Education: Fission Based Thermobaric Weapons VT Supporting Material on 9/11, Nuclear Physics and Disclosure Issues VT Nuclear Education: Antigravity NEO – Mini Nukes and M16: The Economy of War (must read) VT Nuclear Education: Nukes in Iraq, Confirmation UPDATED VT Flexing Its Nuclear Muscle (must read) Nuclear 9/11 Revealed: Theories and Disinformation, the Misguided and the Inhuman (must read) VT Nuclear Education: Tactical Nuclear Warfare (must read) VT Nuclear Education: Early Reactors IAEA investigators: Audit reveals US, not Iran the problem (must read) VT Nuclear Education: History of Mini-Nukes (must read) VT Nuclear Education: Answering the Hype (must read) VT Nuclear Education: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Atom Smasher (must read) VT Nuclear Education: LENR Neutron Distribution Einsteins Theory on Magnetic Buoyancy VT Science: Fuel Cell Technology VT Science: The Farnsworth Fusor VT Science: HAARP Fusion: Junk Science For Rubes NEO – Nuclear Threats Enter the Mainstream (must read) VT Science: NASA’s Low Energy Fusion VooDoo/DooDoo The Connection Between Aurora and Black Triangles (Redux) Jeff Smith on Upcoming Able Danger Leak VT Nuclear Education: Japan VT Nuclear Education: Detonations and Deceit 9/11 Hokum: Deconstructing Christopher Bollyn and Steve Jones Why are the Commanding Generals being Sacked?


veteranstoday--2020-08-08--Arnold Schwarzenegger won’t be back in Portland

Who doesn ’ t remember the 1990 comedy flick Kindergarten Cop ?
If you have been a teacher for some years , you probably have seen it at some point in your career .
Kindergarten Cop is about Arnold Schwarzenegger being a tough city detective .
But he goes undercover as a kindergarten teacher at a school in Oregon to catch drug dealers and gangsters .
The rest , as they say , is history .
If you haven ’ t seen the film , it ’ s recommended because it will show you that people are actually being manipulated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But get this : people in Portland won ’ t be able to view the movie because Lois Leveen , a writer in Portland , twitted that the film should not be shown .
She wrote : • None • “ National reckoning on overpolicing is a weird time to revive Kindergarten Cop .
IRL , we are trying to end the school-to-prison pipeline .
There ’ s nothing entertaining about the presence of police in schools , which feeds the ‘ school-to-prison ’ pipeline in which African American , Latinx [ sic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ criminalized rather than educated .
Five- and 6-year-olds are handcuffed and hauled off to jail routinely in this country .
And this criminalizing of children increases dramatically when cops are assigned to work in schools.
” The Northwest Film Center in Portland caved in .
They declared : “ After discussion with staff and community members , however , we agreed that at this moment in history , John Lewis : Good Trouble is the right film to open this year ’ s Drive-In series.
” It gets really ridiculous .
Leveen added @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cop is only a movie .
So are Birth of a Nation and Gone With the Wind , but we recognize films like those are not ‘ good family fun.
’ They are relics of how pop culture feeds racist assumptions .
Because despite what the movie shows , in reality , schools don ’ t transform cops .
Cops transform schools , and in an extremely detrimental way.
” Leveen is the author of novels such as The Secrets of Mary Bowser , which is about “ a Richmond slave who became @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ 1 ] She also writes on similar themes for the New York Times and the Los Angeles Review of Books .
In June of last year , she wrote “ The Vanishing Black Woman Spy Reappears.
” [ 2 ] That story , she said , is “ a tale of a black undercover agent as true — and as compelling — as the one made famous in BlacKkKlansman ( 2018 ) .
But it happened over 100 years earlier , during the American Civil War — a reminder of how little @ @ @ @ @ @ @ African Americans ( and women ) played in one of the most formative events in our history.
” [ 3 ] As far as I am concerned , not a single black community would stop Kindergarten Cop from screening in Portland—or any place in the United States .
Even Black Lives Matter wouldn ’ t even dare to make such a stupid move .
But Leveen wants to tell us all that Kindergarten Cop is not “ good family fun ” !
All of a sudden , she has become a conservative pundit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and can not show .
I challenge Leveen to even attempt to say the same thing of movies like Beverly Hills Cop , or Lethal Weapons .
I would hasten to say that much of the black community would jump on her if she happens to go toward that direction .
Or how about Inglorious Basterds ( 2009 ) , Django Unchained ( 2012 ) , and The Hateful Eight ( 2015 ) .
You see , Lois Leveen is simply an ideologue .
It ’ s just that simple .
What she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ probably has the potential to bring both cops and decent people together , that there is no need to burn down places and create chaos in places like Portland , that there are decent cops in the streets doing some noble jobs like protecting citizens , that not everyone hates police officers .
You see , these are dangerous , and Leveen doesn ’ t want unity to happen .

Who doesn’t remember the 1990 comedy flick Kindergarten Cop? If you have been a teacher for some years, you probably have seen it at some point in your career.
Kindergarten Cop is about Arnold Schwarzenegger being a tough city detective. But he goes undercover as a kindergarten teacher at a school in Oregon to catch drug dealers and gangsters. The rest, as they say, is history.
If you haven’t seen the film, it’s recommended because it will show you that people are actually being manipulated. The film is absolutely harmless. But get this: people in Portland won’t be able to view the movie because Lois Leveen, a writer in Portland, twitted that the film should not be shown. She wrote:
“National reckoning on overpolicing is a weird time to revive Kindergarten Cop. IRL, we are trying to end the school-to-prison pipeline. There’s nothing entertaining about the presence of police in schools, which feeds the ‘school-to-prison’ pipeline in which African American, Latinx [sic] and other kids of color are criminalized rather than educated. Five- and 6-year-olds are handcuffed and hauled off to jail routinely in this country. And this criminalizing of children increases dramatically when cops are assigned to work in schools.”
The Northwest Film Center in Portland caved in. They declared: “After discussion with staff and community members, however, we agreed that at this moment in history, John Lewis: Good Trouble is the right film to open this year’s Drive-In series.”
Lois Leveen
It gets really ridiculous. Leveen added: “It’s true Kindergarten Cop is only a movie. So are Birth of a Nation and Gone With the Wind, but we recognize films like those are not ‘good family fun.’ They are relics of how pop culture feeds racist assumptions. Because despite what the movie shows, in reality, schools don’t transform cops. Cops transform schools, and in an extremely detrimental way.”
Leveen is the author of novels such as The Secrets of Mary Bowser, which is about “a Richmond slave who became a spy for the Union army.”[1] She also writes on similar themes for the New York Times and the Los Angeles Review of Books. In June of last year, she wrote “The Vanishing Black Woman Spy Reappears.”[2]
That story, she said, is “a tale of a black undercover agent as true — and as compelling — as the one made famous in BlacKkKlansman (2018). But it happened over 100 years earlier, during the American Civil War — a reminder of how little we are taught about the significant roles African Americans (and women) played in one of the most formative events in our history.”[3]
As far as I am concerned, not a single black community would stop Kindergarten Cop from screening in Portland—or any place in the United States. Even Black Lives Matter wouldn’t even dare to make such a stupid move. But Leveen wants to tell us all that Kindergarten Cop is not “good family fun”! All of a sudden, she has become a conservative pundit, telling film producers what they can and cannot show.
I challenge Leveen to even attempt to say the same thing of movies like Beverly Hills Cop, or Lethal Weapons. I would hasten to say that much of the black community would jump on her if she happens to go toward that direction. Or how about Inglorious Basterds (2009), Django Unchained (2012), and The Hateful Eight (2015).
You see, Lois Leveen is simply an ideologue. It’s just that simple. What she seems to fear is that Kindergarten Cop probably has the potential to bring both cops and decent people together, that there is no need to burn down places and create chaos in places like Portland, that there are decent cops in the streets doing some noble jobs like protecting citizens, that not everyone hates police officers. You see, these are dangerous, and Leveen doesn’t want unity to happen.


veteranstoday--2020-08-08--“BOOM” Qanon Spreading Like Wildfire Leading Up To Election – On Scene at the Recording Studio with

“BOOM” Qanon Spreading Like Wildfire Leading Up To Election – On Scene at the Recording Studio with Austin Steinbart

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL https : //www.youtube.com/channel/UCSMiDddiIFSOxakL83fG6GA/ In this episode and interview with Austin Steinbart , we discuss the question many people ask : Is the Q-Anon movement a disinfo psyop to keep people from taking action ?
We were told to “ trust the plan ” and to “ trust sessions ” .
To date we have seen little movement and people are becoming frustrated with the lack of concrete action .
What is the main feature of the interview is the simple acknowledgement that virtually everyone in the USA knows something is drastically wrong .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ground and the right is buying guns and ammo .
The lesson is to learn to work together because both the left and the right see the wrongness in the USA ’ s current systems and how rampant the corruption is .
Who and what rules the American people , and the glaring 2 tiered justice system .
People want fundamental change and the only proven method to achieve meaningful change is for the left and right to work together .
The status quo prevails because they keep the American people divided @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to focus and concentrate our joined efforts on ending the corruption that is protected by those in power and ending the status quo to develop a working system that functions for the benefit of all of the American people.
, not just the 1 % who fancy themselves as our ruling class .
The struggle is not between the left and the right , or between black and white ; but between who is up and who is down trodden .
This November vote like your life depends on it…..because it does .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Slavic christian people , and stole all of their material wealth and property , they will have no problem murdering 65 million “ Deplorables ” in the USA and again stealing all of your wealth and property…..Count on it .
If you would like to help the “ MIKE HARRIS SHOW ” or donate services and/or materials , you may contact Mike Harris by email at [ email protected ]

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSMiDddiIFSOxakL83fG6GA/
In this episode and interview with Austin Steinbart, we discuss the question many people ask: Is the Q-Anon movement a disinfo psyop to keep people from taking action? We were told to “trust the plan” and to “trust sessions”. To date we have seen little movement and people are becoming frustrated with the lack of concrete action.
What is the main feature of the interview is the simple acknowledgement that virtually everyone in the USA knows something is drastically wrong. The left is rioting and burning cities to the ground and the right is buying guns and ammo.
The lesson is to learn to work together because both the left and the right see the wrongness in the USA’s current systems and how rampant the corruption is.
Who and what rules the American people, and the glaring 2 tiered justice system.
People want fundamental change and the only proven method to achieve meaningful change is for the left and right to work together. The status quo prevails because they keep the American people divided and fighting among ourselves. We need to focus and concentrate our joined efforts on ending the corruption that is protected by those in power and ending the status quo to develop a working system that functions for the benefit of all of the American people., not just the 1% who fancy themselves as our ruling class. The struggle is not between the left and the right, or between black and white; but between who is up and who is down trodden. This November vote like your life depends on it…..because it does. Remember the Bolsheviks murdered 100 million Russian Slavic christian people, and stole all of their material wealth and property, they will have no problem murdering 65 million “Deplorables” in the USA and again stealing all of your wealth and property…..Count on it.
(Producer note: Austin and his team were very gracious hosts.)
If you would like to help the “MIKE HARRIS SHOW” or donate services and/or materials, you may contact Mike Harris by email at mikeharris9696@gmail.com