veteranstoday--2020-09-26--NEO – Russia-China switch to counter US-Indo-Pacific-strategy mode

by Salman Rafi Sheikh , …with New Eastern Outlook , Moscow , …and the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences , a research institution for the study of the countries and cultures of Asia and North Africa .
[ Editor ’ s Note : Mr. Sheikh gives us an update on the current state of US ‘ Concentrated Chaos ’ foreign policy via its attempts to continue building a new bi-polar geopolitical structure , which would have been described in early American lexicon as “ you are either Fer us , or Agin us ” , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ course the middle road is the choice that ASEAN countries would prefer , as it is obviously more beneficial to be on good business terms with all .
But at least , with the Trump regime who views peace and stability as ‘ slim pickins ’ , it continues to pry ASEAN countries into its orbit .
Hopefully Biden will not be so aggressive .
Yes , the US has a big navy , but the Chinese navy is growing quickly , along with its new stealth fighters in the pipeline and its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bases and the carrier battle groups in the region .
Five years ago this was not the case , nor were there Russia ’ s SU-57s to counter American F-35s .
Sure , Russia will always be lagging behind in production numbers , but it has the advantage of a defense budget geared toward defense and mutually assured destruction .
The US is spending itself into oblivion on offense and defense , which benefits really whose pocketbooks ?
So the American people have to get a dog into this fight by challenging the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is no credible opposing military threat on the other side of the planet .
The US is there with its PacMan strategy of trying to gobble up control of everything it can to feed the giant sucking sound ( as Ross Perot described it ) of what looks like endless trillion dollar plus deficit budgets .
When are Americans going to wake up to the reality that the main threat to our security lies right here at home , and also in a little country in the Mideast that has had us on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ …Jim W. Dean ] Jim 's Editor ’ s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal Jim 's work includes research , field trips , Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more .
Thanks for helping .
Click to donate > > Big power rivalry is often characterized by alliances and counter-alliances , involving smaller countries on both sides of the rivalry .
Big powers thus tend to engage in a race for winning more and more allies to their side .
This is precisely what is happening in the Asia-Pacific region where the US @ @ @ @ @ @ @ triggered forces of alliances and counter-alliances .
The “ Indo-Pacific Strategy ” is largely aimed at entrenching the US in the region with a view to countering the increasing Russian and Chinese economic and political influence .
It aims at creating conditions that would facilitate a long-term US domination of the region and thus prevent the rise of Russia and China to a level where the US domination will become meaningless .
Russia and China , on the other hand , want to make sure that the US is effectively prevented from creating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by remarkable regional connectivity , such as the ASEAN .
Russia and China have accordingly started making their moves , implementing their vision of unity as against the division that the US strategy proposes .
This was precisely the message that the latest meeting of Russian and Chinese foreign minister gave .
Blasting the US “ Indo-Pacific Strategy ” , Russia ’ s Lavrov said , “ We ( Russia and China ) noted the destructive character of Washington ’ s actions that undermine global strategic stability .
They are fuelling tensions in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ along the Russian and Chinese borders .
Of course , we are worried about this and object to these attempts to escalate artificial tensions .
In this context , we stated that the so-called “ Indo-Pacific strategy ” as it was planned by the initiators , only leads to the separation of the region ’ s states , and is therefore fraught with serious consequences for peace , security and stability in the Asia-Pacific Region.
” Adding further about the Asia-Pacific region and presenting a counter approach to the US ’ divisive policies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in favour of the ASEAN-centric regional security architecture with a view to promoting the unifying agenda , and the preservation of the consensus style of work and consensus-based decision-making in these mechanisms , as it has always been done in the framework of ASEAN and the associated entities .
We are seeing attempts to split the ranks of ASEAN members with the same aims : to abandon consensus-based methods of work and fuel confrontation in this region that is common for all of us.
” Russia ’ s message of unity did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Rather , it collaborates closely with how the ASEAN is placing itself in the larger and still evolving geo-political chessboard .
The recently held ASEAN Foreign Ministers ’ summit made it clear that the region wouldn ’ t become a party to the US politics of ‘ containing ’ China and Russia .
The joint communique , while stressing ASEAN ’ s message of unity , maintained a friendly approach to China and adopted a dialogue based amicable approach to the resolution of all out-standing disputes .
Commenting , for instance , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ASEAN welcomed the “ continuously improving cooperation between ASEAN and China , and were encouraged by the progress of the substantive negotiations towards the early conclusion of an effective and substantive Code of Conduct in the South China Sea ( COC ) consistent with international law.
” This ‘ friendly ’ thinking is in turn a reflection of ASEAN ’ s struggle to avoid being trapped in the US vs. Russia-China rivalry .
Indonesia ’ s foreign minister Retno Marsudi recently cautioned that “ ASEAN , Indonesia , wants to show to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a partner , ” and that “ We don ’ t want to get trapped by this rivalry.
” Russia , by reiterating ASEAN ’ s own message of unity , is thus presenting itself as a viable alternative to the US , which is promoting division and is putting pressure on these countries to subscribe to bi-polar politics .
That Russia , largely prompted by the US ’ anti-Russia and anti-China strategy , is stretching its own reach in South East Asia is significant in that it is no longer a marginal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ While China was already a big player , Russia is becoming more and more acceptable not only because of its own rise as a global power but also because of its commitment to and promotion of a multipolar vision of regional and global politics .
It largely explains why Russia , despite its still limited economic relations with the ASEAN , is , unlike Soviet-era politics , no longer seen as a ‘ security threat.
’ Significantly enough , the above-mentioned joint communique refers to Russia as an important ‘ dialogue partner.
’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foreign ministers shows that Russia is all set to fully capitalize on this shifting attitude in ASEAN .
Although it is mainly allying with China , it is fundamentally preparing and maneuvering according to the way the US plans to create a ring of allies in South East Asia to counter and roll-back what the “ Indo-Pacific Strategy ” document calls the “ revisionist ” and “ malign ” China and Russia .
Salman Rafi Sheikh , research-analyst of International Relations and Pakistan ’ s foreign and domestic affairs , exclusively for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Russia-China Switch to Counter US-Indo-Pacific-Strategy Mode
by Salman Rafi Sheikh, …with New Eastern Outlook, Moscow, …and the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a research institution for the study of the countries and cultures of Asia and North Africa.
[ Editor’s Note: Mr. Sheikh gives us an update on the current state of US ‘Concentrated Chaos’ foreign policy via its attempts to continue building a new bi-polar geopolitical structure, which would have been described in early American lexicon as “you are either Fer us, or Agin us”, with no middle road option.
Of course the middle road is the choice that ASEAN countries would prefer, as it is obviously more beneficial to be on good business terms with all. But at least, with the Trump regime who views peace and stability as ‘slim pickins’, it continues to pry ASEAN countries into its orbit. Hopefully Biden will not be so aggressive.
Yes, the US has a big navy, but the Chinese navy is growing quickly, along with its new stealth fighters in the pipeline and its own hypersonic missiles to threaten all US bases and the carrier battle groups in the region.
Five years ago this was not the case, nor were there Russia’s SU-57s to counter American F-35s. Sure, Russia will always be lagging behind in production numbers, but it has the advantage of a defense budget geared toward defense and mutually assured destruction.
The US is spending itself into oblivion on offense and defense, which benefits really whose pocketbooks?
So the American people have to get a dog into this fight by challenging the US forward military deployment, when there is no credible opposing military threat on the other side of the planet.
The US is there with its PacMan strategy of trying to gobble up control of everything it can to feed the giant sucking sound (as Ross Perot described it) of what looks like endless trillion dollar plus deficit budgets.
When are Americans going to wake up to the reality that the main threat to our security lies right here at home, and also in a little country in the Mideast that has had us on its string for a long time? …Jim W. Dean ]
Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>
– First published … September 19, 2020 –
Big power rivalry is often characterized by alliances and counter-alliances, involving smaller countries on both sides of the rivalry. Big powers thus tend to engage in a race for winning more and more allies to their side.
This is precisely what is happening in the Asia-Pacific region where the US’ so-called “Indo-Pacific Strategy” has triggered forces of alliances and counter-alliances.
The “Indo-Pacific Strategy” is largely aimed at entrenching the US in the region with a view to countering the increasing Russian and Chinese economic and political influence. It aims at creating conditions that would facilitate a long-term US domination of the region and thus prevent the rise of Russia and China to a level where the US domination will become meaningless.
Russia and China, on the other hand, want to make sure that the US is effectively prevented from creating political divisions in a region otherwise marked by remarkable regional connectivity, such as the ASEAN.
Russia and China have accordingly started making their moves, implementing their vision of unity as against the division that the US strategy proposes. This was precisely the message that the latest meeting of Russian and Chinese foreign minister gave. Blasting the US “Indo-Pacific Strategy”, Russia’s Lavrov said,
“We (Russia and China) noted the destructive character of Washington’s actions that undermine global strategic stability. They are fuelling tensions in various parts of the world, including along the Russian and Chinese borders. Of course, we are worried about this and object to these attempts to escalate artificial tensions. In this context, we stated that the so-called “Indo-Pacific strategy” as it was planned by the initiators, only leads to the separation of the region’s states, and is therefore fraught with serious consequences for peace, security and stability in the Asia-Pacific Region.”
Adding further about the Asia-Pacific region and presenting a counter approach to the US’ divisive policies, Lavrov said,
“We spoke in favour of the ASEAN-centric regional security architecture with a view to promoting the unifying agenda, and the preservation of the consensus style of work and consensus-based decision-making in these mechanisms, as it has always been done in the framework of ASEAN and the associated entities. We are seeing attempts to split the ranks of ASEAN members with the same aims: to abandon consensus-based methods of work and fuel confrontation in this region that is common for all of us.”
Russia’s message of unity did not come merely out of its strategic thinking. Rather, it collaborates closely with how the ASEAN is placing itself in the larger and still evolving geo-political chessboard. The recently held ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ summit made it clear that the region wouldn’t become a party to the US politics of ‘containing’ China and Russia.
The joint communique, while stressing ASEAN’s message of unity, maintained a friendly approach to China and adopted a dialogue based amicable approach to the resolution of all out-standing disputes.
Commenting, for instance, on the issue of South China Sea, ASEAN welcomed the “continuously improving cooperation between ASEAN and China, and were encouraged by the progress of the substantive negotiations towards the early conclusion of an effective and substantive Code of Conduct in the South China Sea (COC) consistent with international law.”
This ‘friendly’ thinking is in turn a reflection of ASEAN’s struggle to avoid being trapped in the US vs. Russia-China rivalry.
Indonesia’s foreign minister Retno Marsudi recently cautioned that “ASEAN, Indonesia, wants to show to all that we are ready to be a partner,” and that “We don’t want to get trapped by this rivalry.”
Russia, by reiterating ASEAN’s own message of unity, is thus presenting itself as a viable alternative to the US, which is promoting division and is putting pressure on these countries to subscribe to bi-polar politics.
That Russia, largely prompted by the US’ anti-Russia and anti-China strategy, is stretching its own reach in South East Asia is significant in that it is no longer a marginal and distant player in the region.
While China was already a big player, Russia is becoming more and more acceptable not only because of its own rise as a global power but also because of its commitment to and promotion of a multipolar vision of regional and global politics.
It largely explains why Russia, despite its still limited economic relations with the ASEAN, is, unlike Soviet-era politics, no longer seen as a ‘security threat.’ Significantly enough, the above-mentioned joint communique refers to Russia as an important ‘dialogue partner.’
The latest meeting of Russian and Chinese foreign ministers shows that Russia is all set to fully capitalize on this shifting attitude in ASEAN.
Although it is mainly allying with China, it is fundamentally preparing and maneuvering according to the way the US plans to create a ring of allies in South East Asia to counter and roll-back what the “Indo-Pacific Strategy” document calls the “revisionist” and “malign” China and Russia.
Salman Rafi Sheikh, research-analyst of International Relations and Pakistan’s foreign and domestic affairs, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.


veteranstoday--2020-09-26--Is Monsanto killing you under the guise of science?

Mischa Popoff grew up on an organic farm and has a bachelor ’ s degree in history , particularly in the history of the origin of synthetic fertilizer .
He was also a USDA organic farm and process inspector .
He is the author of Is It Organic ?
JEA : Monsanto started out as one of the largest chemical companies in the twentieth century , and by 1935 they began to produce toxic products such as polychlorinated biphenyl ( PCBs ) , which were widely banned by 1979 because of its health risk in humans and because it was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1 ] In fact , PCBs were known as “ systemic poisons , ” and chemical workers who were exposed to those products “ developed chloracne , a serious skin condition , and liver abnormalities.
” [ 2 ] F.R .
Kaimer , General Electric ’ s representative , declared in 1937 that 50 to 60 people were exposed to some of these poisons , and “ Eight or ten of them were very severely afflicted—horrible specimens as far as their skin condition was concerned .
One man died and the diagnosis may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Halowax vapors but we are not sure of that.
” [ 3 ] Kaimer also said that “ Repeated bodily contact with the liquid Aroclors may lead to an acne-form skin eruption.
” [ 4 ] These systemic poisons were found in refrigerators , paint and flame retardants .
Cecil Drinker , professor of public health and medicine and Dean of Public Health at Harvard University , discovered the problems with PCBs way back in 1937 .
Drinker ended up writing an article in The Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology entitled , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Certain Chlorinated Hydrocarbons.
” [ 5 ] In the same year , L.A. Watt , a Monsanto official , admitted : “ Experimental work in animals shows that prolonged exposure to Aroclor vapors evolved at high temperatures or by repeated oral ingestion will lead to systemic toxic effects.
” [ 6 ] Sociomedical historians and professors Gerald Markowitz and David Rosner wrote two years ago in an article entitled “ PCBs , and the creation of a ‘ world-wide ecological problem ’ ” : “ Researchers have , for instance , linked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ diphenyl ethers—to a wide variety of potentially undesirable health effects , including thyroid disruption , memory and learning problems , delayed mental and physical development , lower IQ , and the early onset of puberty .
“ Of special concern are a variety of chlorinated hydrocarbons , including DDT and other pesticides that were once spread freely across the United States .
Despite being banned decades ago , they have accumulated in the bones , brains , and fatty tissue of virtually all of us .
Their close chemical carcinogenic cousins , polychlorinated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in innumerable household and consumer products—like carbonless copy paper , adhesives , paints , and electrical equipment—from the 1950s through the 1970s .
“ We are still paying the price for that industrial binge today , as these odorless , tasteless compounds have become persistent pollutants in the natural environment and , as a result , in all of us.
” [ 7 ] The interesting thing is that Monsanto were aware of the risks of their products , but they still wanted to , in the words of the company ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out of ‘ em.
” [ 8 ] In an archival document on “ damage to the ecological system by contamination from PCBs , ” it stated : “ The evidence proving the persistence of these compounds and their universal presence in the environment is beyond questioning.
” [ 9 ] It gets worse .
The document continued to say that “ Direct lawsuits are possible ” because “ customers using the products have not been officially notified about known effects nor [ do ] our labels carry this information.
” [ 10 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ internal memo from September 1969 lists PCB leakages in the Gulf Coast , Great Lakes and San Francisco Bay areas and outlines potential cleanup actions .
But the memo also says Monsanto ’ s strategy should be to ‘ let govt prove its case on a case by case basis.
’ “ It says : ‘ We can prove some things are ok at low concentration .
Give Monsanto some defence .
We can ’ t defend vs everything .
Some animals or fish or insects will be harmed.
’ Two months later @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s corporate development committee firmed up this warning : ‘ From the standpoint of reproduction , the PCBs are highly toxic to birds.
’ ” [ 11 ] Bill Sherman , the assistant attorney general for the US state of Washington , said : “ these records confirm that Monsanto knew that their PCBs were harmful and pervasive in the environment , and kept selling them in spite of that fact .
They knew the dangers , but hid them from the public in order to profit… “ At the same time that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PCBs were safe , they were literally graphing their potential legal liability against the lost profits and public image boost that might accompany being responsible and honest .
At the end of the day , Monsanto went for the profits instead of for public health and environmental safety.
” [ 12 ] Monsanto began to expand its capitalist system by taking over the agricultural landscape by the 1920s , and immediately problems ensued .
By 1999 , Monsanto ’ s products created an economic crisis in countries like Belgium .
It was labeled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ food contamination outbreaks .
Wallonia ’ s agriculture minister called it ‘ the most serious economic crisis Belgium has known since the war.
’ ” [ 13 ] In an article entitled “ Monsanto sold banned chemicals for years despite known health risks , archives reveal , ” the Guardian reported back in 2017 : “ Monsanto continued to produce and sell toxic industrial chemicals known as PCBs for eight years after learning that they posed hazards to public health and the environment.
” [ 14 ] Similarly , the Washington Post reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entitled “ Monsanto Hid Decades Of Pollution ” : “ In 1966 , Monsanto managers discovered that fish submerged in that creek turned belly-up within 10 seconds , spurting blood and shedding skin as if dunked into boiling water .
They told no one .
In 1969 , they found fish in another creek with 7,500 times the legal PCB levels .
“ They decided ‘ there is little object in going to expensive extremes in limiting discharges.
’ In 1975 , a company study found that PCBs caused tumors in rats .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ slightly tumorigenic ’ to ‘ does not appear to be carcinogenic.
’ ” [ 15 ] In other words , Monsanto routinely produced toxic waste which they knew would engender serious diseases such as cancer .
As the Post moved on to say : “ Monsanto enjoyed a lucrative four-decade monopoly on PCB production in the United States , and battled to protect that monopoly long after PCBs were confirmed as a global pollutant .
‘ We can ’ t afford to lose one dollar of business , ’ one internal memo concluded.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ an essentially oligarchic company , “ its corporate successors have avoided a regulatory crackdown , spending just $ 40 million on cleanup efforts… ” [ 17 ] Monsanto , as the Post again documents , has been involved in covert operations since the 1930s , and one of the main goals was and still is to make money by any means necessary .
But what has been the result of this capitalist enterprise ?
In July of this year alone , USA Today reported : “ A California appeals court on Monday upheld @ @ @ @ @ @ @ widely used weed killer caused cancer in a school groundskeeper but the panel also slashed the damage award from $ 78.5 million to $ 21.5 million.
” It went on to say : “ The 1st District Court of Appeal said there was evidence to support a California jury ’ s 2018 decision that ‘ Monsanto acted with a conscious disregard for public safety… ’ ” [ 18 ] Here ’ s the actual verdict : “ The original San Francisco Superior Court jury found that St. Louis-based Monsanto had purposely ignored warnings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ingredient in its popular Roundup and Ranger Pro products , causes cancer.
” [ 19 ] In 2019 , Monsanto again lost a case against its diabolical activity in court because it was concluded that its Roundup weed killer was causing cancer .
[ 20 ] In fact , Monsanto has faced thousands upon thousands of Roundup-cancer cases over the years .
In fact , those cases have reached approximately 11,000 .
[ 21 ] This year alone , Monsanto was ordered to pay more than ten billion dollars “ to resolve cancer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 22 ] One lawyer by the name of Brent Wisner who ended up winning a case against Monsanto declared that “ We were finally able to show the jury the secret , internal Monsanto documents proving that Monsanto has known for decades that … Roundup could cause cancer.
” [ 23 ] Numerous scientists have talked about how Monsanto ’ s products are actually leading people to their untimely deaths .
[ 24 ] The International Journal of Toxicology has even declared that glyphosate , Monsanto ’ s herbicide , has been a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stated : “ The glyphosate formulation studied also triggered two ‘ death proteins ’ in human cells known as caspase 3/7 , inducing pathways that activate programmed cell death ( apoptosis ) , a clear sign of significant toxicity.
” [ 25 ] In an article entitled “ Weed-Whacking Herbicide Proves Deadly to Human Cells , ” Scientific American concluded in 2009 that Monsanto ’ s Roundup ’ s “ inert ingredients can kill human cells , particularly embryonic , placental and umbilical cord cells .
The new findings intensify a debate about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , preservatives , surfactants and other substances that manufacturers add to pesticides .
“ Nearly 4,000 inert ingredients are approved for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency .
Glyphosate , Roundup ’ s active ingredient , is the most widely used herbicide in the United States .
About 100 million pounds are applied to U.S. farms and lawns every year.
” [ 26 ] A number of scientists at the University of Caen , France , declared that the inert ingredients which are found in Roundup formulations “ could cause cell damage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ residual levels .
The research team suspects that Roundup might cause pregnancy problems by interfering with hormone production , possibly leading to abnormal fetal development , low birth weights or miscarriages.
” [ 27 ] Scientific American added : “ Inert ingredients are often less scrutinized than active pest-killing ingredients .
Since specific herbicide formulations are protected as trade secrets , manufacturers aren ’ t required to publicly disclose them.
” [ 28 ] But Monsanto has gotten smart over the years .
They have bought some scientists in order to perpetuate the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In fact , they even “ manufactured scientific studies ” and then “ paid scientists to publish them.
” [ 29 ] This is not new at all .
For example , “ the sugar industry had paid scientists in the 1960s to implicate saturated fat , and not sugar , as a cause for heart disease.
” [ 30 ] “ In February 2015 , Monsanto executive William ‘ Bill ’ Heydens emailed his staff instructions to ghostwrite portions of a scientific study on the safety of Roundup , and that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : ‘ just sign their names ’ to the study .
According to this same email , Heydens knew that ghostwriting the study would work : he said that Monsanto had already ghostwritten a study on Roundup in the year 2000 .
“ In the 2015 emails , Bill Heydens and his employees scramble to prepare for an international review of glyphosate by the cancer arm of the World Health Organization .
The emails reveal that some Monsanto employees were apprehensive about ‘ noise ’ coming from independent scientific studies―studies that indicated Roundup @ @ @ @ @ @ @ executives weigh the cost of paying independent experts to create studies ( $ 250,000 ) versus the free option of ‘ ghost-writing ’ studies.
” [ 31 ] Monsanto also funded studies by numerous scientists who pretend to present an impartial scientific judgement on the issue of whether glyphosate is harmful to humans or not .
[ 32 ] Monsanto has been manipulating scientists and journalists for years .
[ 33 ] Now get this : “ A young woman falsely posing as a freelance BBC reporter at one of the Roundup cancer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ management ’ consultant for FTI Consulting , whose clients include Monsanto .
The woman spent time with journalists who were covering the Hardeman v Monsanto trial in San Francisco , pretending to do reporting while also suggesting to the real reporters certain storylines or points that favored Monsanto.
” [ 34 ] There is more : “ More than 20 scientific studies submitted to regulators to prove the safety of the popular weedkilling chemical glyphosate came from a large German laboratory that has been accused of fraud and other wrongdoing.
” [ 35 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study might be accidental , but 20 studies under the name of “ science ” ?
Perhaps the following statement may surprise you : “ Hundreds of studies done by US contract laboratories in the 1970s , 80s and 90s were found to be fraudulent , including some tests used by Monsanto in representations to the US Environmental Protection Agency regarding the company ’ s glyphosate-based Roundup herbicide.
” [ 36 ] Monsanto ’ s covert activity to suppress the truth and manipulate scientists and journalists was known as “ dark money project @ @ @ @ @ @ @ news articles in traditional news outlets ; discrediting and harassing journalists who refused to parrot the company ’ s propaganda ; and secretly funding front groups to amplify pro-Monsanto messaging across social media platforms.
” [ 37 ] Monsanto is even behind “ secret funding for weedkiller studies.
” [ 38 ] Again , these studies are being labeled “ scientific ” and “ academic.
” As one journalist indirectly put it back in 2016 , science is now for sale .
[ 39 ] One classic example of Monsanto ’ s diabolical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Guardian .
Gillam has been covering Monsanto for seventeen years , and has argued that Monsanto is not safe .
By 2014 , an organization by the name of Academic Review published an article bleeding on the work of Gillam and condemning her for not looking at scientific progress .
Gillam noted : “ Internal Monsanto documents have revealed , however , that Academics Review was and is anything but independent .
The organization was the brainchild of Monsanto , designed as a vehicle for responding to ‘ scientific concerns and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the background so as not to harm the credibility of the information , ’ as one November 2010 email from Monsanto executive Eric Sachs stated .
“ According to a March 11 , 2010 email chain , Academics Review was established with the help of a former director of corporate communications at Monsanto who set up his own public relations shop and a former vice president of a biotech industry trade association of which Monsanto was a member .
“ Other internal documents show Monsanto ’ s money and marching orders behind the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ACSH ) , an organization that purports to be independent of industry while publishing articles attacking journalists and scientists whose work contradicts Monsanto ’ s agenda .
Articles written by ACSH associates have appeared in USA Today , the Wall Street Journal and Forbes.
” [ 40 ] Monsanto even created a list of people in France , Germany , Italy , the Netherlands , Poland , Spain and the United Kingdom to speak on behalf of the company .
[ 41 ] The logic is pretty straightforward here : Monsanto is producing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so bad last year that “ French court cancels Monsanto weed killer permit on safety grounds.
” [ 42 ] As one report put it then : “ Whether or not Roundup causes cancer , it still could be harmful to human health for other reasons .
In fact , there is plenty of evidence that glyphosate has a number of harmful health effects , from mild to severe .
“ At the most basic level , Roundup herbicide can cause a type of skin irritation known as photocontact dermatitis .
In most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ uncovered hands , arms , or legs while using the weed killer .
However , if used in spray form , it could also get into the nose , mouth , or eyes , where the effects could be more severe.
” The interesting thing is that “ Australia ’ s agriculture minister insists the common weedkiller Roundup is safe after its manufacturer agreed to pay almost $ 16bn to settle cancer lawsuits in the US.
” [ 43 ] How stupid can we be ?
Charles M. Benbrook , a scientists at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bought by companies like Monsanto , declared : “ If you spend enough time with skunks , you start to smell like one.
” Has the agricultural minister been spending time with skunks ?
It ’ s time to bring in Mischa Popoff to the conversation .
JEA : Let ’ s cut to the chase : define for us Monsanto and what the entire industry is doing to our food ?
MP : One word : monopoly , a monopoly that is now in the hands of Bayer , with a handful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ farming .
JEA : What are some alternatives to Monsanto ?
MP : The organic industry WAS an alternative , but has now been taken over by globalists .
Sadly , over three-quarters of the organic food sold in America is currently being imported ; almost HALF tests positive for prohibited pesticide residues .
JEA : If Monsanto is really bad , can you provide for us some statistics about some of the “ side effects ” ?
MP : No one argues anymore about some of the severe health impacts of Monsanto @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Orange and aspartame are two examples in which Monsanto argued for years against what everyone could see so plainly , that such products are inherently unsafe .
In those days , Monsanto ’ s policy was simply to quit selling these products once the backlash became too much , and never speak of them again .
But in the case of Roundup , the profit margins are just too great to be abandoned .
So they instead decided to sell-out to Bayer , and let them try and handle the backlash .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know exactly HOW the overuse of Roundup is affecting our health because no one is looking into it .
And as long as no one looks into it , Bayer can ’ t be held responsible for any suspected impact on our immune systems from Roundup .
JEA : Have some genuine scientists taken a look at this whole phenomenon ?
MP : The most important reference I can provide is the academic article written by Stephanie Seneff and Anthony Samsel , “ Glyphosate pathways to modern diseases VI : Prions , amyloidoses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry , 2017 , Vol .
17 , Num .
1 , pp .
8-32 .
From that article : “ Most disturbing is the presence of glyphosate in many popular vaccines including the measles , mumps and rubella ( MMR ) vaccine , which we have verified here for the first time.
” No one has contested this claim in any other journal , to my knowledge , which brings us to the key thesis of my article , that “ Bayer executives have everything to gain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with dire headlines warning that Roundup is DANGEROUS , so long as no one figures out that the real problem with Roundup isn ’ t with people applying it ; it ’ s with people absorbing it after eating it or having it injected into their bloodstream.
” As for using Roundup as a desiccant… see “ Glyphosate is not a true desiccant.
” Ian Schemenauer , “ Desiccation and pre-harvest glyphosate ” Government of Saskatchewan , Ministry of Agriculture , 22 October 2016 .
Lastly we have Robert F Kennedy Jr. ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Again , to my knowledge , no one has contested Kennedy ’ s claims .
They just ignore them because Gates owns the networks .
See “ Robert F Kennedy Jr. Exposes Bill Gates ’ Vaccine Dictatorship Plan – Cites Gates ’ Twisted ‘ Messiah Complex ’ ” on Fort Russ News , April 10 , 2020 .
JEA : Why hasn ’ t the government done anything about this whole issue ?
MP : Corrupt politicians , plain and simple .
Politicians never did anything about Agent Orange and aspartame either , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monopoly control over such important staple crops as canola , corn , sugar beets and soy .
Getting politicians to do the right thing is like pushing a rock uphill with your nose with both hands tied behind your back .
JEA : Are there some small but good industries out there that really provide decent alternatives to Monsanto ?
MP : There used to be many… hundreds , if not thousands of alternatives .
But through buy-outs , mergers and predatory take-overs , we are now left with only a handful of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of food production .
Companies like Bayer ( formerly Monsanto ) control the inputs : seed and chemicals , while companies like Purdue , Cargill and Archer-Daniels Midland control the purchasing and distribution of grains , with companies like General Mills and Nabisco controlling the making of consumer goods from those grains .
The best hope is the family farmer , few of whom remain .
And if Bayer gets their way , there will be even fewer remaining in years to come .
JEA : You said that “ but has now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are those people , and why are they doing this to the Americans and much of the world ?
What is the big agenda ?
Money ?
Power ?
Fame ?
Or all the above ?
You ’ ve already suggested that money is involved .
But is there something deeper , something diabolical ?
And if virtually everything has been taken by Monsanto , then what are some practical things that the average citizen can do ?
Is there any hope ?
Or is everyone doomed ?
MP : The organic industry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It started legitimately , but then was taken over by people whose only goal is to make more money .
Jeff Bezos , the owner of Amazon , provides the textbook case .
Bezos bought Whole Foods , America ’ s largest organic grocery retailer , and used his connections with China and the Middle East to undercut American organic farmers… something the previous owner of Whole Foods , John Mackey , was already attempting to do , but lacked the connections that Bezos brought to bear .
When it comes to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mainly focus on their lineup of GMO crops .
Yes , they ’ re certainly problematic .
But the FAR-more pressing issue is the forced ripening of crops , AKA desiccation .
This is viewed as the growth sector when it comes to flogging Roundup .
What can citizens do ?
Demand an end to crop desiccation .
It ’ s bad farming practice , plain and simple , especially when Roundup herbicide is used .
JEA : Is there anything else you would like to say ?
MP : Yes…They gave the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through the patenting of lifeforms , predatory marketing , and political manipulation .
In the 80 ’ s and 90 ’ s , the execs at Monsanto managed to avoid years of safety testing on their GMO crop lineup by convincing politicians and regulators that these crops are “ substantially equivalent ” to existing crops , meaning they didn ’ t need to be safety tested , while at the same time they convinced the patent department that these crops were “ novel ” and hence patentable .
No lifeform should ever be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an animal , not a disease or the vaccine to prevent that disease .
Monsanto did more to erode the fundamental notion that you can ’ t own what God invented than any other corporation .
• [ 1 ] For scholarly studies on similar issues , see Ellen Griffith Spears , Baptized in PCBs : Race , Pollution , and Justice in an All-American Town ( Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press , 2014 ) .
• [ 2 ] Gerald Markowitz and David Rosner , “ Monsanto , PCBs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world-wide ecological problem , ’ ” Journal of Public Health Policy , November 7 , 2018 .
• [ 9 ] Arthur Nelsen , “ Monsanto sold banned chemicals for years despite known health risks , archives reveal , ” Guardian , August 10 , 2017 .
• [ 21 ] Phil McCausland , “ Monsanto parent company Bayer faces thousands of Roundup-cancer cases after $ 2 billion verdict , ” NBC News , May 20 , 2019 ; Sam Levin and Patrick Greenfield , “ Monsanto ordered to pay $ 289m as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cancer , ” Guardian , August 11 , 2018 ; Mihir Zaveri , “ Monsanto Weedkiller Roundup Was ‘ Substantial Factor ’ in Causing Man ’ s Cancer , Jury Says , ” NY Times , March 19 , 2019 ; Julia Jacobs , “ Monsanto Ordered to Pay $ 80 Million in Roundup Cancer Case , ” NY Times , March 27 , 2019 ; “ Jurors say Roundup contributed to a 2nd man ’ s cancer .
Now thousands more cases against Monsanto await , ” CNN , March 20 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chappell , “ Bayer To Pay More Than $ 10 Billion To Resolve Cancer Lawsuits Over Weedkiller Roundup , ” National Public Radio , June 24 , 2020 .
• [ 23 ] Sam Levin and Patrick Greenfield , “ Monsanto ordered to pay $ 289m as jury rules weedkiller caused man ’ s cancer , ” Guardian , August 11 , 2018 .
• [ 24 ] See for example “ Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos , parathion , malathion , diazinon , and glyphosate , ” The Lancelet , March 20 , 2015 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : 490-491 .
• [ 25 ] Gabriela Chaufan , Isis Coalova , María Del Carmen Ríos de Molina , “ Glyphosate commercial formulation causes cytotoxicity , oxidative effects , and apoptosis on human cells : differences with its active ingredient , ” International Journal of Toxicology , January-February 2014 ; for similar studies , see B Bernay , G-E Séralini , “ Ethoxylated adjuvants of glyphosate-based herbicides are active principles of human cell toxicity , ” National Center for Biotechnology Information , November 16 , 2013 .
• [ 29 ] Ed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And Then Used Those Studies To Influence EPA , Other Regulators , ” Huffington Post , March 15 , 2017 .
• [ 30 ] Alison Moodie , “ Before you read another health study , check who ’ s funding the research , ” Guardian , December 12 , 2016 .
• [ 31 ] Mierzwinski , “ Monsanto Manufactured Scientific Studies And Then Used Those Studies To Influence EPA , Other Regulators , ” Huffington Post , March 15 , 2017 .
• [ 32 ] See for example John Acquavella @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tom Sorahan & Douglas L. Weed , “ Glyphosate epidemiology expert panel review : a weight of evidence systematic review of the relationship between glyphosate exposure and non-Hodgkin ’ s lymphoma or multiple myeloma , ” Critical Reviews in Toxicology , Vol .
46 , 2016. https : //www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408444.2016.1214681 .
• [ 33 ] Carey Gillam , “ How Monsanto manipulates journalists and academics , ” Guardian , June 2 , 2019 ; see also Eric Lipton , “ Food Industry Enlisted Academics in G.M.O .
Lobbying War , ” NY Times , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 35 ] Carey Gillam , “ Science shouldn ’ t be for sale – we need reform to industry-funded studies to keep people safe , ” Guardian , February 18 , 2020 .
• [ 39 ] Carey Gillam , “ Science shouldn ’ t be for sale – we need reform to industry-funded studies to keep people safe , ” Guardian , February 18 , 2016 .
• [ 43 ] “ Australia ’ s agriculture minister says Roundup is safe after $ 16bn US cancer lawsuit , ” Guardian , June @ @ @ @

Mischa Popoff grew up on an organic farm and has a bachelor’s degree in history, particularly in the history of the origin of synthetic fertilizer. He was also a USDA organic farm and process inspector. He is the author of Is It Organic?
JEA: Monsanto started out as one of the largest chemical companies in the twentieth century, and by 1935 they began to produce toxic products such as polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs), which were widely banned by 1979 because of its health risk in humans and because it was even hazardous to the environment.[1]
In fact, PCBs were known as “systemic poisons,” and chemical workers who were exposed to those products “developed chloracne, a serious skin condition, and liver abnormalities.”[2] F.R. Kaimer, General Electric’s representative, declared in 1937 that 50 to 60 people were exposed to some of these poisons, and “Eight or ten of them were very severely afflicted—horrible specimens as far as their skin condition was concerned. One man died and the diagnosis may have attributed his death to exposure to Halowax vapors but we are not sure of that.”[3]
Kaimer also said that “Repeated bodily contact with the liquid Aroclors may lead to an acne-form skin eruption.”[4]
These systemic poisons were found in refrigerators, paint and flame retardants. Cecil Drinker, professor of public health and medicine and Dean of Public Health at Harvard University, discovered the problems with PCBs way back in 1937.
Drinker ended up writing an article in The Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology entitled, “The Problem of Possible Systemic Effects from Certain Chlorinated Hydrocarbons.”[5] In the same year, L.A. Watt, a Monsanto official, admitted: “Experimental work in animals shows that prolonged exposure to Aroclor vapors evolved at high temperatures or by repeated oral ingestion will lead to systemic toxic effects.”[6]
Sociomedical historians and professors Gerald Markowitz and David Rosner wrote two years ago in an article entitled “PCBs, and the creation of a ‘world-wide ecological problem’”:
“Researchers have, for instance, linked one of the most common flame retardants—polybrominated diphenyl ethers—to a wide variety of potentially undesirable health effects, including thyroid disruption, memory and learning problems, delayed mental and physical development, lower IQ, and the early onset of puberty.
“Of special concern are a variety of chlorinated hydrocarbons, including DDT and other pesticides that were once spread freely across the United States. Despite being banned decades ago, they have accumulated in the bones, brains, and fatty tissue of virtually all of us. Their close chemical carcinogenic cousins, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), were found in innumerable household and consumer products—like carbonless copy paper, adhesives, paints, and electrical equipment—from the 1950s through the 1970s.
“We are still paying the price for that industrial binge today, as these odorless, tasteless compounds have become persistent pollutants in the natural environment and, as a result, in all of us.”[7]
The interesting thing is that Monsanto were aware of the risks of their products, but they still wanted to, in the words of the company’s own words, “sell the hell out of ‘em.”[8] In an archival document on “damage to the ecological system by contamination from PCBs,” it stated: “The evidence proving the persistence of these compounds and their universal presence in the environment is beyond questioning.”[9]
It gets worse. The document continued to say that “Direct lawsuits are possible” because “customers using the products have not been officially notified about known effects nor [do] our labels carry this information.”[10] The Guardian reported:
“Another internal memo from September 1969 lists PCB leakages in the Gulf Coast, Great Lakes and San Francisco Bay areas and outlines potential cleanup actions. But the memo also says Monsanto’s strategy should be to ‘let govt prove its case on a case by case basis.’
“It says: ‘We can prove some things are ok at low concentration. Give Monsanto some defence. We can’t defend vs everything. Some animals or fish or insects will be harmed.’ Two months later, a PCB presentation to Monsanto’s corporate development committee firmed up this warning: ‘From the standpoint of reproduction, the PCBs are highly toxic to birds.’”[11]
Bill Sherman, the assistant attorney general for the US state of Washington, said:
“these records confirm that Monsanto knew that their PCBs were harmful and pervasive in the environment, and kept selling them in spite of that fact. They knew the dangers, but hid them from the public in order to profit…
“At the same time that Monsanto was telling the public that that PCBs were safe, they were literally graphing their potential legal liability against the lost profits and public image boost that might accompany being responsible and honest. At the end of the day, Monsanto went for the profits instead of for public health and environmental safety.”[12]
Monsanto began to expand its capitalist system by taking over the agricultural landscape by the 1920s, and immediately problems ensued. By 1999, Monsanto’s products created an economic crisis in countries like Belgium. It was labeled “one of Europe’s worst food contamination outbreaks. Wallonia’s agriculture minister called it ‘the most serious economic crisis Belgium has known since the war.’”[13]
In an article entitled “Monsanto sold banned chemicals for years despite known health risks, archives reveal,” the Guardian reported back in 2017: “Monsanto continued to produce and sell toxic industrial chemicals known as PCBs for eight years after learning that they posed hazards to public health and the environment.”[14]
Similarly, the Washington Post reported way back in 2002 in an article entitled “Monsanto Hid Decades Of Pollution”:
“In 1966, Monsanto managers discovered that fish submerged in that creek turned belly-up within 10 seconds, spurting blood and shedding skin as if dunked into boiling water. They told no one. In 1969, they found fish in another creek with 7,500 times the legal PCB levels.
“They decided ‘there is little object in going to expensive extremes in limiting discharges.’ In 1975, a company study found that PCBs caused tumors in rats. They ordered its conclusion changed from ‘slightly tumorigenic’ to ‘does not appear to be carcinogenic.’”[15]
In other words, Monsanto routinely produced toxic waste which they knew would engender serious diseases such as cancer. As the Post moved on to say: “Monsanto enjoyed a lucrative four-decade monopoly on PCB production in the United States, and battled to protect that monopoly long after PCBs were confirmed as a global pollutant. ‘We can’t afford to lose one dollar of business,’ one internal memo concluded.”[16]
Since Monsanto is an essentially oligarchic company, “its corporate successors have avoided a regulatory crackdown, spending just $40 million on cleanup efforts…”[17] Monsanto, as the Post again documents, has been involved in covert operations since the 1930s, and one of the main goals was and still is to make money by any means necessary. But what has been the result of this capitalist enterprise?
In July of this year alone, USA Today reported: “A California appeals court on Monday upheld a groundbreaking verdict that Monsanto’s widely used weed killer caused cancer in a school groundskeeper but the panel also slashed the damage award from $78.5 million to $21.5 million.” It went on to say: “The 1st District Court of Appeal said there was evidence to support a California jury’s 2018 decision that ‘Monsanto acted with a conscious disregard for public safety…’”[18]
Here’s the actual verdict: “The original San Francisco Superior Court jury found that St. Louis-based Monsanto had purposely ignored warnings and evidence that glyphosate, the active ingredient in its popular Roundup and Ranger Pro products, causes cancer.”[19]
In 2019, Monsanto again lost a case against its diabolical activity in court because it was concluded that its Roundup weed killer was causing cancer.[20] In fact, Monsanto has faced thousands upon thousands of Roundup-cancer cases over the years. In fact, those cases have reached approximately 11,000.[21] This year alone, Monsanto was ordered to pay more than ten billion dollars “to resolve cancer lawsuits over weed killer Roundup.”[22]
One lawyer by the name of Brent Wisner who ended up winning a case against Monsanto declared that “We were finally able to show the jury the secret, internal Monsanto documents proving that Monsanto has known for decades that … Roundup could cause cancer.”[23]
Numerous scientists have talked about how Monsanto’s products are actually leading people to their untimely deaths.[24] The International Journal of Toxicology has even declared that glyphosate, Monsanto’s herbicide, has been a problem since the beginning.
The journal stated: “The glyphosate formulation studied also triggered two ‘death proteins’ in human cells known as caspase 3/7, inducing pathways that activate programmed cell death (apoptosis), a clear sign of significant toxicity.”[25] In an article entitled “Weed-Whacking Herbicide Proves Deadly to Human Cells,” Scientific American concluded in 2009 that Monsanto’s Roundup’s
“inert ingredients can kill human cells, particularly embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells. The new findings intensify a debate about so-called ‘inerts’ — the solvents, preservatives, surfactants and other substances that manufacturers add to pesticides.
“Nearly 4,000 inert ingredients are approved for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Glyphosate, Roundup’s active ingredient, is the most widely used herbicide in the United States. About 100 million pounds are applied to U.S. farms and lawns every year.”[26]
A number of scientists at the University of Caen, France, declared that the inert ingredients which are found in Roundup formulations “could cause cell damage and even death [at the] residual levels. The research team suspects that Roundup might cause pregnancy problems by interfering with hormone production, possibly leading to abnormal fetal development, low birth weights or miscarriages.”[27]
Scientific American added: “Inert ingredients are often less scrutinized than active pest-killing ingredients. Since specific herbicide formulations are protected as trade secrets, manufacturers aren’t required to publicly disclose them.”[28]
But Monsanto has gotten smart over the years. They have bought some scientists in order to perpetuate the capitalist and diabolical activities of the industry. In fact, they even “manufactured scientific studies” and then “paid scientists to publish them.”[29] This is not new at all. For example, “the sugar industry had paid scientists in the 1960s to implicate saturated fat, and not sugar, as a cause for heart disease.”[30]
Listen to this:
“In February 2015, Monsanto executive William ‘Bill’ Heydens emailed his staff instructions to ghostwrite portions of a scientific study on the safety of Roundup, and that he would tell scientists to, quote: ‘just sign their names’ to the study. According to this same email, Heydens knew that ghostwriting the study would work: he said that Monsanto had already ghostwritten a study on Roundup in the year 2000.
“In the 2015 emails, Bill Heydens and his employees scramble to prepare for an international review of glyphosate by the cancer arm of the World Health Organization. The emails reveal that some Monsanto employees were apprehensive about ‘noise’ coming from independent scientific studies―studies that indicated Roundup is carcinogenic. In the emails, executives weigh the cost of paying independent experts to create studies ($250,000) versus the free option of ‘ghost-writing’ studies.”[31]
Monsanto also funded studies by numerous scientists who pretend to present an impartial scientific judgement on the issue of whether glyphosate is harmful to humans or not.[32] Monsanto has been manipulating scientists and journalists for years.[33] Now get this:
“A young woman falsely posing as a freelance BBC reporter at one of the Roundup cancer trials was in fact a ‘reputation management’ consultant for FTI Consulting, whose clients include Monsanto. The woman spent time with journalists who were covering the Hardeman v Monsanto trial in San Francisco, pretending to do reporting while also suggesting to the real reporters certain storylines or points that favored Monsanto.”[34]
There is more: “More than 20 scientific studies submitted to regulators to prove the safety of the popular weedkilling chemical glyphosate came from a large German laboratory that has been accused of fraud and other wrongdoing.”[35]
Did you catch that? One study might be accidental, but 20 studies under the name of “science”? Perhaps the following statement may surprise you: “Hundreds of studies done by US contract laboratories in the 1970s, 80s and 90s were found to be fraudulent, including some tests used by Monsanto in representations to the US Environmental Protection Agency regarding the company’s glyphosate-based Roundup herbicide.”[36]
Monsanto’s covert activity to suppress the truth and manipulate scientists and journalists was known as “dark money project,” which includes “planting helpful news articles in traditional news outlets; discrediting and harassing journalists who refused to parrot the company’s propaganda; and secretly funding front groups to amplify pro-Monsanto messaging across social media platforms.”[37]
Monsanto is even behind “secret funding for weedkiller studies.”[38] Again, these studies are being labeled “scientific” and “academic.” As one journalist indirectly put it back in 2016, science is now for sale.[39]
One classic example of Monsanto’s diabolical activity was pointed out by Carey Gillam of the Guardian. Gillam has been covering Monsanto for seventeen years, and has argued that Monsanto is not safe. By 2014, an organization by the name of Academic Review published an article bleeding on the work of Gillam and condemning her for not looking at scientific progress. Gillam noted:
“Internal Monsanto documents have revealed, however, that Academics Review was and is anything but independent. The organization was the brainchild of Monsanto, designed as a vehicle for responding to ‘scientific concerns and allegations’ while ‘keeping Monsanto in the background so as not to harm the credibility of the information,’ as one November 2010 email from Monsanto executive Eric Sachs stated.
“According to a March 11, 2010 email chain, Academics Review was established with the help of a former director of corporate communications at Monsanto who set up his own public relations shop and a former vice president of a biotech industry trade association of which Monsanto was a member.
“Other internal documents show Monsanto’s money and marching orders behind the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH), an organization that purports to be independent of industry while publishing articles attacking journalists and scientists whose work contradicts Monsanto’s agenda. Articles written by ACSH associates have appeared in USA Today, the Wall Street Journal and Forbes.”[40]
Monsanto even created a list of people in France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom to speak on behalf of the company.[41]
The logic is pretty straightforward here: Monsanto is producing diseases and eventual deaths. It was so bad last year that “French court cancels Monsanto weed killer permit on safety grounds.”[42] As one report put it then:
“Whether or not Roundup causes cancer, it still could be harmful to human health for other reasons. In fact, there is plenty of evidence that glyphosate has a number of harmful health effects, from mild to severe.
“At the most basic level, Roundup herbicide can cause a type of skin irritation known as photocontact dermatitis. In most cases this is limited to contact with uncovered hands, arms, or legs while using the weed killer. However, if used in spray form, it could also get into the nose, mouth, or eyes, where the effects could be more severe.”
The interesting thing is that “Australia’s agriculture minister insists the common weedkiller Roundup is safe after its manufacturer agreed to pay almost $16bn to settle cancer lawsuits in the US.”[43]
How stupid can we be? Charles M. Benbrook, a scientists at Washington State University who later regretted being bought by companies like Monsanto, declared: “If you spend enough time with skunks, you start to smell like one.” Has the agricultural minister been spending time with skunks?
It’s time to bring in Mischa Popoff to the conversation.
JEA: Let’s cut to the chase: define for us Monsanto and what the entire industry is doing to our food?
MP: One word: monopoly, a monopoly that is now in the hands of Bayer, with a handful of other corporations controlling the rest of farming.
JEA: What are some alternatives to Monsanto?
MP: The organic industry WAS an alternative, but has now been taken over by globalists. Sadly, over three-quarters of the organic food sold in America is currently being imported; almost HALF tests positive for prohibited pesticide residues.
JEA: If Monsanto is really bad, can you provide for us some statistics about some of the “side effects”?
MP: No one argues anymore about some of the severe health impacts of Monsanto’s previous patented inventions. Agent Orange and aspartame are two examples in which Monsanto argued for years against what everyone could see so plainly, that such products are inherently unsafe. In those days, Monsanto’s policy was simply to quit selling these products once the backlash became too much, and never speak of them again.
But in the case of Roundup, the profit margins are just too great to be abandoned. So they instead decided to sell-out to Bayer, and let them try and handle the backlash. The bottom line is we don’t know exactly HOW the overuse of Roundup is affecting our health because no one is looking into it. And as long as no one looks into it, Bayer can’t be held responsible for any suspected impact on our immune systems from Roundup.
JEA: Have some genuine scientists taken a look at this whole phenomenon?
MP: The most important reference I can provide is the academic article written by Stephanie Seneff and Anthony Samsel, “Glyphosate pathways to modern diseases VI: Prions, amyloidoses and autoimmune neurological diseases” in The Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry, 2017, Vol. 17, Num. 1, pp. 8-32. From that article:
“Most disturbing is the presence of glyphosate in many popular vaccines including the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, which we have verified here for the first time.”
No one has contested this claim in any other journal, to my knowledge, which brings us to the key thesis of my article, that “Bayer executives have everything to gain from a protracted court battle, replete with dire headlines warning that Roundup is DANGEROUS, so long as no one figures out that the real problem with Roundup isn’t with people applying it; it’s with people absorbing it after eating it or having it injected into their bloodstream.”
As for using Roundup as a desiccant… see “Glyphosate is not a true desiccant.” Ian Schemenauer, “Desiccation and pre-harvest glyphosate” Government of Saskatchewan, Ministry of Agriculture, 22 October 2016.
Lastly we have Robert F Kennedy Jr.’s well-founded critique of Bill Gates. Again, to my knowledge, no one has contested Kennedy’s claims. They just ignore them because Gates owns the networks. See “Robert F Kennedy Jr. Exposes Bill Gates’ Vaccine Dictatorship Plan – Cites Gates’ Twisted ‘Messiah Complex’” on Fort Russ News, April 10, 2020.
JEA: Why hasn’t the government done anything about this whole issue?
MP: Corrupt politicians, plain and simple. Politicians never did anything about Agent Orange and aspartame either, and never cared when Monsanto seized total monopoly control over such important staple crops as canola, corn, sugar beets and soy. Getting politicians to do the right thing is like pushing a rock uphill with your nose with both hands tied behind your back.
JEA: Are there some small but good industries out there that really provide decent alternatives to Monsanto?
MP: There used to be many… hundreds, if not thousands of alternatives. But through buy-outs, mergers and predatory take-overs, we are now left with only a handful of corporate giants that control the various aspects of food production. Companies like Bayer (formerly Monsanto) control the inputs: seed and chemicals, while companies like Purdue, Cargill and Archer-Daniels Midland control the purchasing and distribution of grains, with companies like General Mills and Nabisco controlling the making of consumer goods from those grains. The best hope is the family farmer, few of whom remain. And if Bayer gets their way, there will be even fewer remaining in years to come.
JEA: You said that “but has now been taken over by globalists.” Who are those people, and why are they doing this to the Americans and much of the world? What is the big agenda? Money? Power? Fame? Or all the above? You’ve already suggested that money is involved. But is there something deeper, something diabolical? And if virtually everything has been taken by Monsanto, then what are some practical things that the average citizen can do? Is there any hope? Or is everyone doomed?
MP: The organic industry is no different than any other industry. It started legitimately, but then was taken over by people whose only goal is to make more money. Jeff Bezos, the owner of Amazon, provides the textbook case.
Bezos bought Whole Foods, America’s largest organic grocery retailer, and used his connections with China and the Middle East to undercut American organic farmers… something the previous owner of Whole Foods, John Mackey, was already attempting to do, but lacked the connections that Bezos brought to bear.
When it comes to Monsanto (now Bayer) the activists mainly focus on their lineup of GMO crops. Yes, they’re certainly problematic. But the FAR-more pressing issue is the forced ripening of crops, AKA desiccation. This is viewed as the growth sector when it comes to flogging Roundup. What can citizens do? Demand an end to crop desiccation. It’s bad farming practice, plain and simple, especially when Roundup herbicide is used.
JEA: Is there anything else you would like to say?
MP: Yes…They gave the science of genetic engineering a bad name through the patenting of lifeforms, predatory marketing, and political manipulation.
In the 80’s and 90’s, the execs at Monsanto managed to avoid years of safety testing on their GMO crop lineup by convincing politicians and regulators that these crops are “substantially equivalent” to existing crops, meaning they didn’t need to be safety tested, while at the same time they convinced the patent department that these crops were “novel” and hence patentable.
No lifeform should ever be patented. Not a crop, not an animal, not a disease or the vaccine to prevent that disease. Monsanto did more to erode the fundamental notion that you can’t own what God invented than any other corporation.
[1] For scholarly studies on similar issues, see Ellen Griffith Spears, Baptized in PCBs: Race, Pollution, and Justice in an All-American Town (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2014).
[2] Gerald Markowitz and David Rosner, “Monsanto, PCBs, and the creation of a “world-wide ecological problem,’” Journal of Public Health Policy, November 7, 2018.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Arthur Nelsen, “Monsanto sold banned chemicals for years despite known health risks, archives reveal,” Guardian, August 10, 2017.
[10] Ibid.
[11] Ibid.
[12] Ibid.
[13] Ibid.
[14] Ibid.
[15] Michael Grunwald, “Monsanto Hid Decades Of Pollution,” Washington Post, January 1, 2002.
[16] Ibid.
[17] Ibid.
[18] “California court upholds verdict in Monsanto weed killer cancer case, reduces damage award to $21.5M,” USA Today, July 21, 2020.
[19] Ibid.
[20] Kelly Tyko, “Man awarded $80M in lawsuit claiming Monsanto’s Roundup causes cancer,” USA Today, March 27, 2019.
[21] Phil McCausland, “Monsanto parent company Bayer faces thousands of Roundup-cancer cases after $2 billion verdict,” NBC News, May 20, 2019; Sam Levin and Patrick Greenfield, “Monsanto ordered to pay $289m as jury rules weedkiller caused man’s cancer,” Guardian, August 11, 2018; Mihir Zaveri, “Monsanto Weedkiller Roundup Was ‘Substantial Factor’ in Causing Man’s Cancer, Jury Says,” NY Times, March 19, 2019; Julia Jacobs, “Monsanto Ordered to Pay $80 Million in Roundup Cancer Case,” NY Times, March 27, 2019; “Jurors say Roundup contributed to a 2nd man’s cancer. Now thousands more cases against Monsanto await,” CNN, March 20, 2019.
[22] Bill Chappell, “Bayer To Pay More Than $10 Billion To Resolve Cancer Lawsuits Over Weedkiller Roundup,” National Public Radio, June 24, 2020.
[23] Sam Levin and Patrick Greenfield, “Monsanto ordered to pay $289m as jury rules weedkiller caused man’s cancer,” Guardian, August 11, 2018.
[24] See for example “Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate,” The Lancelet, March 20, 2015, vol. 16, issue 5: 490-491.
[25] Gabriela Chaufan, Isis Coalova, María Del Carmen Ríos de Molina, “Glyphosate commercial formulation causes cytotoxicity, oxidative effects, and apoptosis on human cells: differences with its active ingredient,” International Journal of Toxicology, January-February 2014; for similar studies, see B Bernay, G-E Séralini, “Ethoxylated adjuvants of glyphosate-based herbicides are active principles of human cell toxicity,” National Center for Biotechnology Information, November 16, 2013.


veteranstoday--2020-09-26--Racist?  Crazy?  So are many if not most of his followers as well

And this surprise , the man who hates Joe Biden talking about ‘ Joe Biden ’ and why VT gives its total support to Joe Biden .
Let Lindsey Graham tell you why .
ATTENTION READERS Due to the nature of independent content , VT can not guarantee content validity .
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT 's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news , opinion and media .
All content is owned by author exclusively .
Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ affiliates , advertisers , sponsors , partners or technicians .
Some content may be satirical in nature .
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT. About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy Due to the nature of independent content , VT can not guarantee content validity.We ask you toso a clear comprehension of VT 's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news , opinion and media.All content is owned by author exclusively .
Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , affiliates , advertisers , sponsors , partners or technicians .
Some content may be satirical in nature .
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT .

https://twitter.com/DearAuntCrabby/status/1309860776799338498?s=20
200,000 is not just a number. We must never become numb to the unfathomable loss we’ve experienced at Trump’s hands. #StopTheMadnessStopTrump https://t.co/wAUrGwOySf
Wow. This video is AWESOME. 🔥@SwingLeftMaine asked Mainers how they were voting and why.
RETWEET this, because it will make @SenatorCollins VERY concerned. #DemCastME #mepolitics Cc: @SaraGideon pic.twitter.com/DkzbvKlvrr
— Nick Knudsen 🇺🇸 (@DemWrite) September 26, 2020


veteranstoday--2020-09-27--“Pandemic Planned for Decades”. Kennedy blames Fauci & Gates. Terrible Plot in 30 Investigations’ su

“Pandemic Planned for Decades”. Kennedy blames Fauci & Gates. Terrible Plot in 30 Investigations’ summary. Pope against Big Pharma’s Affairs

« The governments love pandemics .
They love pandemics for the same reason they love war .
It gives them the ability to impose controls on the population that the population would otherwise never accept—creating institutions and mechanisms for orchestrating and imposing obedience .
« I will tell you something : it is a mystery to me , how all these big , important people like Bill Gates and Tony Fauci were planning and thinking about this pandemic for decades—planning it so that we would all be safe when the pandemic finally came .
And yet , now that it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seem to know what they are talking about » .
These words were spoken a few weeks ago in Berlin by Robert F. Kennedy jr , son of the late former United States Attorney General and nephew of the assassinated President John F. Kennedy , during a protest against the handling of the emergency from Covid- 19 in which more than 10 thousand people took part .
Let ’ s start from them to make a synthesis of 30 reportages called CoronaVirus Bio-Arma , the first ten , and then WuhanGates , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to us that all the secrets of this pandemic widely prophesied by illustrious Democratic exponents ( Donor Bill Gates , former President Barack Obama , former CIA Deputy Director Avril Haines ) were to be sought in the perverse intertwining between the Wuhan Institute of Virology , prime suspect for its very dangerous experiments on Coronavirus of the SARS strain infected with HIV .
It was already funded by the European Commission chaired by the Italian democrat Romano Prodi in 2004 and then by the USAID projects , the American government agency used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Intelligence Agency in its international operations , and supported by the Bill & Melinda Foundation during the Obama administration , since 2009 .
« They can not tell you what the case fatality rate for COVID is , that ’ s basic .
They can not give us a PCR test that actually works .
They don ’ t have—they have to change the definition of COVID on the death certificates , constantly , to make it look more and more dangerous .
The one thing they are good at is pumping up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Berliners , before recalling the famous speech delivered by JFK in the same city with the legendary phrase “ Ich bin Berliner ” ( I am Berliner ) .
To his words were added those of Pope Francis I who , awakened from a long torpor , pointed the finger at the affairs of the Big Pharma , unscrupulous and shady as we have demonstrated in the many investigations that we will summarize below , without naming them .
« The crisis we are experiencing due to the pandemic affects everyone – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which was held on the morning of Wednesday 9 September in the Courtyard of San Damaso of the Vatican Apostolic Palace – We can come out better if we all seek good together common .
Unfortunately , we are witnessing the emergence of partisan interests .
For example , there are those who would like to appropriate possible solutions , as in the case of vaccines and then sell them to others .
Some take advantage of the situation to foment divisions : to seek economic or political advantages , generating or increasing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the suffering of others , they pass over and go their own way » .
A “ trait d ’ union ” between the two speeches came from the White House the disruptive one of American President Donald Trump who , to get out of the media impasse caused by the ambiguous words spoken about the fallen soldiers , pointed the finger at the Department of State as he had already done a few months ago by correlating Dr. Fauci ( NIAID director and supervisor of all military bacteriological experiments from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ State in a joke during a press conference .
As reported in great detail by Politico webmedia , Trump said « leaders at the Pentagon probably weren ’ t “ in love with me ” because “ they want to do nothing but fight wars so that all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay happy ” » .
« “ Some people don ’ t like to come home , some people like to continue to spend money , ” Trump said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ another , that ’ s what it was.
” – added Politico about the statement – He asserted that while U.S. troops largely support him , he does not receive the same affinity from the top .
He made the comment as he advocated for the removal of American troops from “ endless wars ” and lambasted NATO allies who “ rip us off ” » .
Wars like pandemics , missiles like bacteriological weapons which the US Navy was proud of since 1952 with a Hollywood-style documentary , declassified a few years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on its YouTube channel .
All for a question of money and power .
Kennedy has been portrayed as a conspiracy theorist by the mainstream media although he has repeatedly stated that he does not belong to the “ no vax ” but that he is fighting for safe pediatric vaccines in reference to the NCVIA ( National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act ) of 1986 .
As an activist attorney and representative of the Informed Consent Action Network ( ICAN ) , supported by 55 organizations representing more than 5 million people , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ delivering a letter to Don Wright , MD , MPH , secretary of the HHS at that time , stating that the HHS ( Health and Human Services ; Department of Health and Human Services ) had failed in its duty to conduct the scientific research necessary to prove the safety of vaccines as required by law and that he should have acted immediately to remedy this negligence .
Also because vaccines are currently the only pharmaceutical product on the US market that is immune to vaccine injury lawsuits , as a result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( VICA ) approved by Congress and signed into law by then President Ronald Reagan .
The dispute between ICAN and HHS began in 2017 and ended on July 13 , 2018 when the Kennedy-sponsored association won this historic legal battle thanks to the ruling of the District Court of the Southern District of New York .
« ICAN was therefore forced to file a lawsuit to force HHS to either provide copies of its biennial vaccine safety reports to Congress or admit it never filed these reports .
The result of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and shockingly admit that it never , not even once , submitted a single biennial report to Congress detailing the improvements in vaccine safety .
This speaks volumes to the seriousness by which vaccine safety is treated at HHS and heightens the concern that HHS doesn ’ t have a clue as to the actual safety profile of the now 29 doses , and growing , of vaccines given by one year of age » wrote the association commenting on the sentence .
« In contrast , HHS takes the other portions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine uptake , very seriously , spending billions annually and generating a steady stream of reports on how to improve vaccine uptake .
Regrettably , HHS has chosen to focus on its obligation to increase vaccine uptake and defend against any claim vaccines cause harm in the National Injury Vaccine Compensation Program ( aka , the Vaccine Court ) to such a degree that it has abandoned its vaccine safety responsibilities .
If HHS is not , as confirmed in Court this week , even fulfilling the simple task of filing a biennial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is little hope that HHS is actually tackling the much harder job of actually improving vaccine safety » it still noticed Kennedy ’ s Ican .
If this happens in the developed United States of America , what can happen in the poor countries of Asia and Africa used by USAID projects as guinea pigs ?
It may happen what happened in Georgia where in a laboratory financed by the Pentagon ’ s DTRA agency but managed by the contractor GILEAD , the big pharma that became rich with Remdesivir against Covid-19 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a few months enough to induce Russia to advance suspicions on the testing of bacteriological weapons , such as , according to now multiple authoritative sources , is the SARS-2 virus , believed to be a genetically modified organism in the laboratory by 15 scientists , a former director of British counter-intelligence , the former president of Iran and the metropolitan cardinal of Sri Lanka .
« We want health officials who don ’ t have financial entanglements with the pharmaceutical industry—who are working for us .
We want officials who care about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not about pharmaceutical profits or government control » further said in Berlin Bobby Kennedy Jr. that several times in other official speeches he accused Anthony Fauci of having specific interests in the deal .
Fauci in addition to being the consultant to the White House on the Covid-19 emergency and for many years director of the NIAID ( National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ) .
« Tony Fauci has many , many vaccine patents … and there ’ s a vaccine patent he has that is a way of packaging a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protein sheet … and then deliver it through a vaccine … somehow he ended up owning that patent … Tony Fauci will be able to cash… .
So Fauci ’ s agency will collect half of the royalties for that vaccine [ related to the coronavirus ] » even declared also as reported by the website The Gateway Pundit which quotes a speech by Kennedy in which the financial connections between Fauci and Bill Gates ( financier of various experiments ) shared by NIAID ) .
« And the pandemic is a crisis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these policies .
It gives them the ability to obliterate the middle class , to destroy the institutions of democracy , to shift all of our wealth , from all of us , to a handful of billionaires to make themselves rich by impoverishing the rest of us .
And the only thing that ’ s between them and our children is this crowd who has come to Berlin .
We are going to show them !
We are going to demand our democracy back !
Thank you very much for fighting !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ acclaimed by the cheers of the people .
Our way of fighting has been and is to demonstrate in detail the interconnections between transnational military projects and big pharma that this Covid-19 virus , in some genotypes highly lethal if not treated properly and in others not , was created in the laboratory and widespread to sow panic on the earth in order to enrich the shareholders of the big pharma , the same as the arms lobbies , and to impose that New World Order widely announced by scholars of Freemasonry before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ waste of time .
Here is a micro-synthesis of the summary reports of our investigations that confirm Kennedy ’ s theories in facts .
The American lawyer Francis Boyle , author of the Biological Weapons Convention ( BWC ) approved by the US Congress in 1989 , was the first to consider Covid-19 a virus who escaped from the laboratory of the Wuhan Institute of Virology .
But in the course of the reportages it was discovered that the first superviruses were actually built in North Carolina University during the Obama administration , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic and financed the suspicious exercises in October 2019 in which the former deputy director of the CIA , Avril Haines , swas the protagonist .
She later became Deputy National Security Advisor to the White House by virtue of her historic professional collaboration with Joe Biden .
It was she who prophesied in 2018 the need for “ a world order ” against the risks of new pandemics from respiratory diseases .
Prophecies that smell of conspiracy .
The global immunization plan wanted by Obama saw Italy become a “ pilot country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Washington and Rome and paved the way for the lucrative business of London ’ s GlaxoSmithKline , controlled by shareholders of the Weapons Lobby and already convicted in various judicial investigations , administered by a director of Microsoft Corporation confirming the connection between big pharma and Bill Gates .
Among the financiers of the world vaccination plan is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which is in business with GSK itself thanks to the Arab branch enriched thanks to a capital increase of the English parent company .
A whirlwind of money as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 2015 funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and by the USAID-EPT-PREDICT synergy supported by the EcoHealth Alliance ( EHA ) of New York , of which Johnson & Johnson is a sponsor recipient of a billion dollars for vaccine development after the outbreak of the pandemic .
REVELATIONS OF HER MAJESTY FORMER 007′ DIRECTOR After the American bacteriological weapons expert Francis Boyle , the former president of Iran and the metropolitan cardinal of Sri Lanka also the former director of British counterintelligence MI 6 Richard Dearlove , claims that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does so on the basis of research carried out by two biologists , one English and the other Danish , whose publication has been delayed for fear of the Scandinavian to sign it and about which nothing will be known .
The news is reported by various newspapers in the United Kingdom but only very few in Italy and soon ends up in oblivion despite the authority of the person who made these very heavy statements .
His revelations actually confirm the study carried out by nine researchers from New Delhi in turn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of HIV in 1983 .
His study , registered under the name of bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez , raises a flurry of controversy and the mainstream media attack the French scientist who knows China well having worked at Shanghai ’ s Jao Tong University after a life spent at Pasteur Institute of Paris which played a fundamental role in the first research on the SARS virus in 2004 in Wuhan .
THE CHINA-USA DEAL WITH CIA AND GATES Montagnier argues two things of unprecedented gravity : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the insert of HIV sequences as already demonstrated by the study of the Indians that was mysteriously withdrawn , but he also claims that it is a deal between China and States United .
( read more ) Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio © COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS no reproduction without authorization – Versione originale in Italiano THE GATEWAY – KENNEDY CLAIMS FAUCI AND GATES WILL MAKE BILLIONS

by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio for VT Italy
Versione originale in Italiano
First posted on September, 26
«The governments love pandemics. They love pandemics for the same reason they love war. It gives them the ability to impose controls on the population that the population would otherwise never accept—creating institutions and mechanisms for orchestrating and imposing obedience.
«I will tell you something: it is a mystery to me, how all these big, important people like Bill Gates and Tony Fauci were planning and thinking about this pandemic for decades—planning it so that we would all be safe when the pandemic finally came. And yet, now that it is here, they don’t seem to know what they are talking about».
These words were spoken a few weeks ago in Berlin by Robert F. Kennedy jr, son of the late former United States Attorney General and nephew of the assassinated President John F. Kennedy, during a protest against the handling of the emergency from Covid- 19 in which more than 10 thousand people took part.
Let’s start from them to make a synthesis of 30 reportages called CoronaVirus Bio-Arma, the first ten, and then WuhanGates, the other 20, when it became clear to us that all the secrets of this pandemic widely prophesied by illustrious Democratic exponents (Donor Bill Gates, former President Barack Obama, former CIA Deputy Director Avril Haines) were to be sought in the perverse intertwining between the Wuhan Institute of Virology, prime suspect for its very dangerous experiments on Coronavirus of the SARS strain infected with HIV.
It was already funded by the European Commission chaired by the Italian democrat Romano Prodi in 2004 and then by the USAID projects, the American government agency used as a financial tool by the Central Intelligence Agency in its international operations, and supported by the Bill & Melinda Foundation during the Obama administration, since 2009.
«They cannot tell you what the case fatality rate for COVID is, that’s basic. They cannot give us a PCR test that actually works. They don’t have—they have to change the definition of COVID on the death certificates, constantly, to make it look more and more dangerous. The one thing they are good at is pumping up fear» Kennedy highlighted in front of the Berliners, before recalling the famous speech delivered by JFK in the same city with the legendary phrase “Ich bin ein Berliner” (I am a Berliner).
To his words were added those of Pope Francis I who, awakened from a long torpor, pointed the finger at the affairs of the Big Pharma, unscrupulous and shady as we have demonstrated in the many investigations that we will summarize below, without naming them.
«The crisis we are experiencing due to the pandemic affects everyone – Pope Francis said at the General Audience which was held on the morning of Wednesday 9 September in the Courtyard of San Damaso of the Vatican Apostolic Palace – We can come out better if we all seek good together common. Unfortunately, we are witnessing the emergence of partisan interests. For example, there are those who would like to appropriate possible solutions, as in the case of vaccines and then sell them to others. Some take advantage of the situation to foment divisions: to seek economic or political advantages, generating or increasing conflicts. Others simply do not care about the suffering of others, they pass over and go their own way».
A “trait d’union” between the two speeches came from the White House the disruptive one of American President Donald Trump who, to get out of the media impasse caused by the ambiguous words spoken about the fallen soldiers, pointed the finger at the Department of State as he had already done a few months ago by correlating Dr. Fauci (NIAID director and supervisor of all military bacteriological experiments from the Obama era onwards) with the Deep State in a joke during a press conference.
As reported in great detail by Politico webmedia, Trump said «leaders at the Pentagon probably weren’t “in love with me” because “they want to do nothing but fight wars so that all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay happy”».
«“Some people don’t like to come home, some people like to continue to spend money,” Trump said. “One cold-hearted globalist betrayal after another, that’s what it was.” – added Politico about the statement – He asserted that while U.S. troops largely support him, he does not receive the same affinity from the top. He made the comment as he advocated for the removal of American troops from “endless wars” and lambasted NATO allies who “rip us off”».
Wars like pandemics, missiles like bacteriological weapons which the US Navy was proud of since 1952 with a Hollywood-style documentary, declassified a few years ago and published exclusively by Gospa News on its YouTube channel. All for a question of money and power.
HISTORICAL SENTENCE ON VACCINES OBTAINED BY KENNEDY
Kennedy has been portrayed as a conspiracy theorist by the mainstream media although he has repeatedly stated that he does not belong to the “no vax” but that he is fighting for safe pediatric vaccines in reference to the NCVIA (National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act) of 1986.
As an activist attorney and representative of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), supported by 55 organizations representing more than 5 million people, he had taken an unprecedented step in delivering a letter to Don Wright, MD, MPH, secretary of the HHS at that time, stating that the HHS (Health and Human Services; Department of Health and Human Services) had failed in its duty to conduct the scientific research necessary to prove the safety of vaccines as required by law and that he should have acted immediately to remedy this negligence.
Also because vaccines are currently the only pharmaceutical product on the US market that is immune to vaccine injury lawsuits, as a result of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act (VICA) approved by Congress and signed into law by then President Ronald Reagan.
The dispute between ICAN and HHS began in 2017 and ended on July 13, 2018 when the Kennedy-sponsored association won this historic legal battle thanks to the ruling of the District Court of the Southern District of New York.
«ICAN was therefore forced to file a lawsuit to force HHS to either provide copies of its biennial vaccine safety reports to Congress or admit it never filed these reports. The result of the lawsuit is that HHS had to finally and shockingly admit that it never, not even once, submitted a single biennial report to Congress detailing the improvements in vaccine safety. This speaks volumes to the seriousness by which vaccine safety is treated at HHS and heightens the concern that HHS doesn’t have a clue as to the actual safety profile of the now 29 doses, and growing, of vaccines given by one year of age» wrote the association commenting on the sentence.
«In contrast, HHS takes the other portions of the 1986 Act, which require promoting vaccine uptake, very seriously, spending billions annually and generating a steady stream of reports on how to improve vaccine uptake. Regrettably, HHS has chosen to focus on its obligation to increase vaccine uptake and defend against any claim vaccines cause harm in the National Injury Vaccine Compensation Program (aka, the Vaccine Court) to such a degree that it has abandoned its vaccine safety responsibilities. If HHS is not, as confirmed in Court this week, even fulfilling the simple task of filing a biennial report on vaccine safety improvements, there is little hope that HHS is actually tackling the much harder job of actually improving vaccine safety» it still noticed Kennedy’s Ican.
KENNEDY’S ACCUSATIONS TO FAUCI
If this happens in the developed United States of America, what can happen in the poor countries of Asia and Africa used by USAID projects as guinea pigs?
It may happen what happened in Georgia where in a laboratory financed by the Pentagon’s DTRA agency but managed by the contractor GILEAD, the big pharma that became rich with Remdesivir against Covid-19, where 72 human guinea pigs died in a few months enough to induce Russia to advance suspicions on the testing of bacteriological weapons, such as, according to now multiple authoritative sources, is the SARS-2 virus, believed to be a genetically modified organism in the laboratory by 15 scientists, a former director of British counter-intelligence, the former president of Iran and the metropolitan cardinal of Sri Lanka.
«We want health officials who don’t have financial entanglements with the pharmaceutical industry—who are working for us. We want officials who care about our children’s health, and not about pharmaceutical profits or government control» further said in Berlin Bobby Kennedy Jr. that several times in other official speeches he accused Anthony Fauci of having specific interests in the deal. Fauci in addition to being the consultant to the White House on the Covid-19 emergency and for many years director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases).
«Tony Fauci has many, many vaccine patents … and there’s a vaccine patent he has that is a way of packaging a coronavirus with another vaccine … in a protein sheet … and then deliver it through a vaccine … somehow he ended up owning that patent … Tony Fauci will be able to cash…. So Fauci’s agency will collect half of the royalties for that vaccine [related to the coronavirus]» even declared also as reported by the website The Gateway Pundit which quotes a speech by Kennedy in which the financial connections between Fauci and Bill Gates (financier of various experiments) shared by NIAID).
«And the pandemic is a crisis of convenience—for the elites who are dictating these policies. It gives them the ability to obliterate the middle class, to destroy the institutions of democracy, to shift all of our wealth, from all of us, to a handful of billionaires to make themselves rich by impoverishing the rest of us. And the only thing that’s between them and our children is this crowd who has come to Berlin. We are going to show them! We are going to demand our democracy back! Thank you very much for fighting!”» concluded JFK’s grandson acclaimed by the cheers of the people.
Our way of fighting has been and is to demonstrate in detail the interconnections between transnational military projects and big pharma that this Covid-19 virus, in some genotypes highly lethal if not treated properly and in others not, was created in the laboratory and widespread to sow panic on the earth in order to enrich the shareholders of the big pharma, the same as the arms lobbies, and to impose that New World Order widely announced by scholars of Freemasonry before which every democratic election will be a waste of time.
Here is a micro-synthesis of the summary reports of our investigations that confirm Kennedy’s theories in facts.
CORONAVIRUS – 10: THE PLOT IN 100 LINES
The American lawyer Francis Boyle, author of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) approved by the US Congress in 1989, was the first to consider Covid-19 a virus who escaped from the laboratory of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
But in the course of the reportages it was discovered that the first superviruses were actually built in North Carolina University during the Obama administration, funded by Bill Gates who predicted the pandemic and financed the suspicious exercises in October 2019 in which the former deputy director of the CIA, Avril Haines, swas the protagonist.
She later became Deputy National Security Advisor to the White House by virtue of her historic professional collaboration with Joe Biden. It was she who prophesied in 2018 the need for “a world order” against the risks of new pandemics from respiratory diseases. Prophecies that smell of conspiracy.
BIOWEAPON-VACCINES INTIGUES AMONG CHINA, USA, CIA AND SAUDI
The global immunization plan wanted by Obama saw Italy become a “pilot country” in a synergy between the Dems of Washington and Rome and paved the way for the lucrative business of London’s GlaxoSmithKline, controlled by shareholders of the Weapons Lobby and already convicted in various judicial investigations, administered by a director of Microsoft Corporation confirming the connection between big pharma and Bill Gates.
Among the financiers of the world vaccination plan is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which is in business with GSK itself thanks to the Arab branch enriched thanks to a capital increase of the English parent company. A whirlwind of money as in the research projects on dangerous superviruses of 2015 funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and by the USAID-EPT-PREDICT synergy supported by the EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) of New York, of which Johnson & Johnson is a sponsor recipient of a billion dollars for vaccine development after the outbreak of the pandemic.
REVELATIONS OF HER MAJESTY FORMER 007′ DIRECTOR
After the American bacteriological weapons expert Francis Boyle, the former president of Iran and the metropolitan cardinal of Sri Lanka also the former director of British counterintelligence MI 6 Richard Dearlove, claims that SARS-Cov-2 is a genetically modified. It does so on the basis of research carried out by two biologists, one English and the other Danish, whose publication has been delayed for fear of the Scandinavian to sign it and about which nothing will be known.
The news is reported by various newspapers in the United Kingdom but only very few in Italy and soon ends up in oblivion despite the authority of the person who made these very heavy statements. His revelations actually confirm the study carried out by nine researchers from New Delhi in turn accredited by the French virologist Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of HIV in 1983.
His study, registered under the name of bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez, raises a flurry of controversy and the mainstream media attack the French scientist who knows China well having worked at Shanghai’s Jao Tong University after a life spent at Pasteur Institute of Paris which played a fundamental role in the first research on the SARS virus in 2004 in Wuhan.
WuhanGates 4 report In thewe highlighted these discoveries by also explaining the concept of GOF, the gain of function, or the enhancement of the bacteriological load similar to the concept of uranium enrichment for nuclear warheads.
THE CHINA-USA DEAL WITH CIA AND GATES
Montagnier argues two things of unprecedented gravity: SARS-2 was created in the laboratory with the insert of HIV sequences as already demonstrated by the study of the Indians that was mysteriously withdrawn, but he also claims that it is a deal between China and States United. (read more)
WUHAN-GATES – 9. THE PROOFS: HIV inserted in SARS chimeric virus in 2007. Thanks to Australian & EU Commission Funds
WUHAN-GATES – 4. “Covid-19 manipulated, CHINA-US Hidden Affair”. Class-Action for Bio-Weapon in Texas
More Scientists Dead
WUHAN-GATES – 11. HIV INSIDE SARS-2: Dangerous Experiments, Scientists Dead & Spies’ Ring in Canada, China and US
POST CONTINUES HERE
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
no reproduction without authorization – Versione originale in Italiano
MAIN SOURCES
GOSPA NEWS – WUHAN.GATES REPORTS
GOSPA NEWS – CORONA VIRUS DOSSIER
GOSPA NEWS – WEAPONS’ LOBBY INVESTIGATIONS
ABSCONDO – ORIGINAL KENNEDY’S SPEECH IN BERLIN
POLITICO – TRUMP DISPARAGES PENTAGON CHIEFS
THE GATEWAY – KENNEDY CLAIMS FAUCI AND GATES WILL MAKE BILLIONS
*