vaxxter--2020-08-26--Manufactured Crisis: What Are You Going To Do?

At the Davos conclave in January , Klaus Schwab addressed the audience of globalists and elite financial architects : “ The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect , reimagine , and reset our world.
” The pronouncement took place weeks before the novel coronavirus spread through the United States .
The ‘ Global Economic Reset ’ envisioned by Schwab , founder of the World Economic Forum ( “ Forum ” ) , placed him at the proscenium of the New World Order .
On January 23 , 2020 , the Forum signed the final leg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development ( OECD ) .
Six months prior , the Forum and the United Nations signed the original framework outlining “ areas of cooperation to deepen institutional engagement and jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
” What took place over six months with little fanfare or media coverage was put in motion and described as a “ rare but narrow window of opportunity ” by Klaus Schwab who spoke boldly about how to change the world in his image .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and then updated it for 2020 .
The plan wasn ’ t born yesterday , nor was it created overnight .
Like the coronavirus , the plan needed a long runway to be developed and then released in stages .
It required social conditioning .
It also needed to appear natural while carrying the maximum effect to turn pockets of resistance into obedience , and one day into full submission of forced vaccinations .
What does that mean for the people of the earth ?
Unbeknownst to most of them , they would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social engineering and biologic experiment in human history .
First , all 193 member countries of the U.N. signed the resolution in 2015 , putting unelected officials at the helm of changing society and the future of the planet .
Next , they promised to adopt the 2030 sustainable development goals .
Then , the Fortune 1000 corporations pledged their support .
With the super alliance set to transform the world economic system and much more , one obstacle emerged : Donald J. Trump ’ s upset victory in the 2016 U.S. presidential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and likely delayed the rollout of their plan .
But only temporarily .
Two of the six program areas of Agenda 2030 focused on Health and Digital Cooperation of Klaus Schwab ’ s brainchild , the “ Fourth Industrial Revolution.
” In the former , the capture of health agencies , institutions , and stakeholders of medicine and science needed an event to “ vaccinate the world.
” Bill Gates , a Forum collaborator and sponsor , famously made that call to action during his numerous TV appearances about the Covid-19 pandemic .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ saw the omnipresent Orwellian importance of data collection , data surveillance , and profile analysis of every human on earth as key to implementing and completing the takeover .
To achieve biosurveillance of all people , the planners needed to launch a pandemic with lockdowns and shelter-in-place orders and included shutting down brick and mortar businesses around the world .
It also required experts to amplify the fear of “ emerging global health threats , ” like the hoax measles outbreak in New York and Samoa and the Ebola outbreak in the Congo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arbitrary rules rolled out , societies were no longer dealing with the threat of the virus per se , but the friction of people trying to obey and comply .
In the United Kingdom , political scientists saw the disputes as a threat to the plan and published an eight-page guide , “ Options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures.
” They needed tighter control .
The options included Education , Persuasion through “ emotional messaging , ” Incentivization , Coercion , and Enablement vis-à-vis “ community resourcing.
” “ A substantial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sufficiently personally threatened… The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent , using hard-hitting emotional messaging.
” The messaging they chose wasn ’ t really about health and wellbeing .
No , the pandemic was really about social control .
When it was finally uncovered that the tech giants , Big Pharma , the multinational news corporations , and all level of government had signed on to the U.N.-Forum ’ s agenda , it became obvious how the masters of the “ Plandemic ” implemented those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they controlled the narrative .
They captured control of all of humanity beginning with rules that at first seemed logical to contain the contagion .
Wear masks , maintain social distances , shelter-in-place , and shutdown places where people meet and congregate .
Some of the shutdowns were arbitrarily labeled “ non-essential businesses.
” That included bars , cafes , taverns , restaurants , stores , private shops , churches , schools , colleges , parks , beaches , gyms , hair salons , and on and on .
The news pumped @ @ @ @ @ @ @ measures were “ for your wellness and safety.
” The articles were funneled through the digital and social media gatekeepers of Google , YouTube , Facebook , Twitter , and telecom providers .
Every radio and television commercial reminded us to follow the rules to “ be safe.
” That ensured any truthful opposition would be censored , banned , and shutdown .
The plan also achieved another objective : It blocked people from meeting in person to complain and disallowed groups from forming that would be large enough to revolt .
Were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2020 strategy to disrupt the upcoming presidential election ?
Were the shutdowns designed to stop Trump from gathering support and supporters at rallies ?
The obvious answers to both are yes .
It should be clear that the U.N.-Forum/Gates-Event 201 axis wants to remove anything that would block the implementation of the full 2030 Agenda .
The temporary nature of the measures – as promised – has yet to be removed .
Lockdowns in international locations , such as New Zealand and Australia are extreme despite data showing the outbreaks and deaths have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the faulty statistics , the CDC invented a new term , “ Twindemic.
” That ’ s a combo of seasonal flu and coronavirus statistics , a nice marketing ploy to keep the masses in fear and uncertainty .
Like shaming people for non-compliance , doubt and fear are tools they have used since the start of this global disaster .
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control recently announced it was monitoring the sewer systems for traces of the COVID virus .
This isn ’ t new ; they have surveilled sewer systems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ century .
Scientists in Northern Italy claimed they found coronavirus in their sewer systems last December .
The same finding happened around the same time in France .
“ From 60 tests that I conducted by obtaining patient data… 58 had received flu vaccines .
Young intubated people had used VaxiGrip Tetra , which is also intended for children…..All the strains contained in this year ’ s flu shots were reported by the WHO in early 2019 , and contained two ( 2 ) strains of coronavirus ( inactivated ) .
It is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the vaccines “ under observation ” are Fluad 2019-2020 , Influvac-S Tetra , Influvac-S , and Vaxigrip Tetra .
That proposes a serious question : Was the coronavirus released in Wuhan at its biowarfare lab AND spread worldwide by influenza vaccines last year ?
If that ’ s the case , it would explain : • How the virus mutated so quickly • The sudden appearance of corona-illness in some areas of the world , but not in others • Why the virus was isolated on some cruise ships , but not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those living in nursing homes , were much more vulnerable and had worse outcomes ; flu shots are handed out like a special type of candy in long-term care facilities This social engineering experiment is about control .
It ’ s a dry-run to see how much people are willing to tolerate and how many are willing to be obedient and compliant .
When will they crack ?
When will they wave the white flag and surrender…or when will they revolt ?
Experimenting to find the emotional breaking points while collecting and analyzing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Powers That Be ( TPTB ) are learning the correct messaging to implement total control over the global population .
They are determining how to roll out the next forms of coercion , from a cashless society to immunity passports and the use of mandatory vaccination .
They are determined to identify the brave , bold resisters to label them with a “ Scarlet Letter ” – a mobile app , a wristband , an ankle bracelet or a red flag hung on a house as they did in Samoa last year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ After the rules are fully implemented , forced vaccinations will be coming to a doorstep near you .
We the People still have a window of opportunity to resist and revolt .
What are you going to do , given the choice to die on your feet or live on your knees ?
What is freedom worth to you ?
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and treatments , clean technology , green energy , and the BP Oil Spill , to business and Wall Street , and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics since 2005 .
He is the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain logistics in the Construction IT space .
James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area .
He is the author of Master Manipulator : The Explosive True Story of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the CDC .

by James Grundvig, Investigative Reporter, Vaxxter Contributor
At the Davos conclave in January, Klaus Schwab addressed the audience of globalists and elite financial architects: “The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world.” The pronouncement took place weeks before the novel coronavirus spread through the United States.
The ‘Global Economic Reset’ envisioned by Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum (“Forum”), placed him at the proscenium of the New World Order. On January 23, 2020, the Forum signed the final leg of the “Strategic Partnership Framework” with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Six months prior, the Forum and the United Nations signed the original framework outlining “areas of cooperation to deepen institutional engagement and jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”
What took place over six months with little fanfare or media coverage was put in motion and described as a “rare but narrow window of opportunity” by Klaus Schwab who spoke boldly about how to change the world in his image. He wrote the Davos Manifesto in the 1970s and then updated it for 2020.
The plan wasn’t born yesterday, nor was it created overnight. Like the coronavirus, the plan needed a long runway to be developed and then released in stages. It required social conditioning. It also needed to appear natural while carrying the maximum effect to turn pockets of resistance into obedience, and one day into full submission of forced vaccinations.
What does that mean for the people of the earth? Unbeknownst to most of them, they would be taking part in the most significant social engineering and biologic experiment in human history.
First, all 193 member countries of the U.N. signed the resolution in 2015, putting unelected officials at the helm of changing society and the future of the planet. Next, they promised to adopt the 2030 sustainable development goals. Then, the Fortune 1000 corporations pledged their support. With the super alliance set to transform the world economic system and much more, one obstacle emerged: Donald J. Trump’s upset victory in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Trump’s ascendency disrupted and likely delayed the rollout of their plan. But only temporarily.
Two of the six program areas of Agenda 2030 focused on Health and Digital Cooperation of Klaus Schwab’s brainchild, the “Fourth Industrial Revolution.” In the former, the capture of health agencies, institutions, and stakeholders of medicine and science needed an event to “vaccinate the world.” Bill Gates, a Forum collaborator and sponsor, famously made that call to action during his numerous TV appearances about the Covid-19 pandemic. In the latter, Schwab and Gates saw the omnipresent Orwellian importance of data collection, data surveillance, and profile analysis of every human on earth as key to implementing and completing the takeover.
Control by Social Engineering
To achieve biosurveillance of all people, the planners needed to launch a pandemic with lockdowns and shelter-in-place orders and included shutting down brick and mortar businesses around the world. It also required experts to amplify the fear of “emerging global health threats,” like the hoax measles outbreak in New York and Samoa and the Ebola outbreak in the Congo.
With all the social engineering and arbitrary rules rolled out, societies were no longer dealing with the threat of the virus per se, but the friction of people trying to obey and comply. In the United Kingdom, political scientists saw the disputes as a threat to the plan and published an eight-page guide, “Options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures.”
They needed tighter control. The options included Education, Persuasion through “emotional messaging,” Incentivization, Coercion, and Enablement vis-à-vis “community resourcing.”
The paper declared:
“A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened… The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging.”
The messaging they chose wasn’t really about health and wellbeing. No, the pandemic was really about social control. When it was finally uncovered that the tech giants, Big Pharma, the multinational news corporations, and all level of government had signed on to the U.N.-Forum’s agenda, it became obvious how the masters of the “Plandemic” implemented those controls with fascist lockstep synchronicity.
They control the news
They control the information
They control the money
They control the people
Thus, they controlled the narrative.
They captured control of all of humanity beginning with rules that at first seemed logical to contain the contagion. Wear masks, maintain social distances, shelter-in-place, and shutdown places where people meet and congregate. Some of the shutdowns were arbitrarily labeled “non-essential businesses.” That included bars, cafes, taverns, restaurants, stores, private shops, churches, schools, colleges, parks, beaches, gyms, hair salons, and on and on.
The news pumped out daily articles about how the temporary measures were “for your wellness and safety.” The articles were funneled through the digital and social media gatekeepers of Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and telecom providers. Every radio and television commercial reminded us to follow the rules to “be safe.” That ensured any truthful opposition would be censored, banned, and shutdown.
The plan also achieved another objective: It blocked people from meeting in person to complain and disallowed groups from forming that would be large enough to revolt. Were the people divided as part of a 2020 strategy to disrupt the upcoming presidential election? Were the shutdowns designed to stop Trump from gathering support and supporters at rallies?
The obvious answers to both are yes. It should be clear that the U.N.-Forum/Gates-Event 201 axis wants to remove anything that would block the implementation of the full 2030 Agenda.
The temporary nature of the measures – as promised – has yet to be removed. Lockdowns in international locations, such as New Zealand and Australia are extreme despite data showing the outbreaks and deaths have become negligible. To pile on to the faulty statistics, the CDC invented a new term, “Twindemic.” That’s a combo of seasonal flu and coronavirus statistics, a nice marketing ploy to keep the masses in fear and uncertainty. Like shaming people for non-compliance, doubt and fear are tools they have used since the start of this global disaster.
Coronavirus in Sewage and Flu Vaccines
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control recently announced it was monitoring the sewer systems for traces of the COVID virus. This isn’t new; they have surveilled sewer systems for pathogens going back to the 20th century. Scientists in Northern Italy claimed they found coronavirus in their sewer systems last December. The same finding happened around the same time in France.
In April, an Italian news site wrote:
“From 60 tests that I conducted by obtaining patient data… 58 had received flu vaccines. Young intubated people had used VaxiGrip Tetra, which is also intended for children…..All the strains contained in this year’s flu shots were reported by the WHO in early 2019, and contained two (2) strains of coronavirus (inactivated). It is not a secondary matter.”
For Italy, the vaccines “under observation” are Fluad 2019-2020, Influvac-S Tetra, Influvac-S, and Vaxigrip Tetra.
That proposes a serious question: Was the coronavirus released in Wuhan at its biowarfare lab AND spread worldwide by influenza vaccines last year?
If that’s the case, it would explain:
How the virus mutated so quickly
The sudden appearance of corona-illness in some areas of the world, but not in others
Why the virus was isolated on some cruise ships, but not others
Why the elderly, especially those living in nursing homes, were much more vulnerable and had worse outcomes; flu shots are handed out like a special type of candy in long-term care facilities
Human Mice in a Maze
This social engineering experiment is about control. It’s a dry-run to see how much people are willing to tolerate and how many are willing to be obedient and compliant. When will they crack? When will they wave the white flag and surrender…or when will they revolt?
Experimenting to find the emotional breaking points while collecting and analyzing their DNA obtained through obligatory testing, The Powers That Be (TPTB) are learning the correct messaging to implement total control over the global population. They are determining how to roll out the next forms of coercion, from a cashless society to immunity passports and the use of mandatory vaccination.
They are determined to identify the brave, bold resisters to label them with a “Scarlet Letter” – a mobile app, a wristband, an ankle bracelet or a red flag hung on a house as they did in Samoa last year over an outbreak of the measles.
After the rules are fully implemented, forced vaccinations will be coming to a doorstep near you. We the People still have a window of opportunity to resist and revolt. What are you going to do, given the choice to die on your feet or live on your knees? What is freedom worth to you?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text DRT to 28228
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist, covering subjects from autism, its cause and treatments, clean technology, green energy, and the BP Oil Spill, to business and Wall Street, and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics since 2005. He is the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain logistics in the Construction IT space. James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area. He is the author of Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC.


vaxxter--2020-08-31--Book Review: “COVID-19: A Devil’s Choice” by John Schroeter

Covid-19 A Devil ’ s Choice is a literal timeline detailing the beginning of what is called the COVID-19 pandemic to our current state of affairs .
It is written in a numbered format from 1 to 100 .
Following this is a doctor-driven discussion regarding the virus itself and the dangers it poses to society at large .
For a deeper discussion into the book , what it means for all of us , along with actionable steps we can take to dispel fear and understand the larger context of what ’ s happening , I interviewed the author @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hope will impart knowledge and expand the conversation .
His detailed and thoughtful answers , as well as his rich perspective , will inform and educate in these times of great confusion .
Get ready to connect the dots .
Maria : Your book details the sequence of events from what we know about the inception of the virus known as SARS-CoV2 to where we are today , on the precipice of a new world that can only be changed through our own consciousness .
You follow up with a discussion with Jane @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her paper ‘ A Perspective on SARS-CoV2 , the Most Dangerous Virus in History.
’ What do you hope readers will take away after reading your book ?
John : Thank you so much , Maria .
I sincerely hope the book will spark some latent curiosity , to encourage people to start asking questions about what ’ s really going on .
I hope readers will be moved to start testing the prevailing narrative , and not simply accept the course of events without challenge .
I hope they ’ ll do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s being promulgated as authoritative “ settled science ” with respect to this virus and the measures taken to contain it are actually anything but .
I do believe if more people did just this much , this whole thing would crumble like the house of cards built on sand that it actually is .
This is what I set out to do in this book : to take the claims to task , point by point .
In fact , the inspiration for the “ 100 points ” format was Martin Luther @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he nailed to the door in order to spur debate and dialog .
That was his original intent .
And it ’ s my intent to nail these 100 points to the virtual door of the world in order to stimulate thought , discussion , learning , and discovery about what is arguably the most consequential event in our history .
Sadly , though , instead of discussion , it would also be an act of resistance , because the free exchange of ideas is being suppressed across this country in ways that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I hope that readers will become emboldened as they come to understand what ’ s really behind this crisis .
Maria : Thank you for those thoughts .
What would be one actionable step , big or small , that a person could take right now to change their consciousness from fear to empowerment ?
John : At the end of the book , I detail 10 things people can do right now to empower themselves .
But you ’ ve really nailed the problem on the head with the keyword fear .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggestions are concerned with fear .
But it ’ s a complex fear .
Besides what we understand to be an irrational fear of the virus , there are other forms of fear that can be just as debilitating .
At the forefront is the fear that Martin Luther King described when he wrote , “ Many people fear nothing more terribly than to take a position which stands out sharply and clearly from the prevailing opinion.
” We see just how true that is , for example , with the mass , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one wants to be the outlier .
No one wants to be ostracized .
No one wants to stand apart from “ prevailing opinion ” and risk ridicule or scorn or be told they ’ re threatening lives with their selfishness .
This is particularly insidious because , in the case of mask mandates , they are a very visible form of compliance that actually reinforces the fear , and hence the mass submission .
It ’ s a feedback loop that continuously gains power .
The only way to break that feedback @ @ @ @ @ @ @ directly .
And it ’ s going to take some doing for some people to venture this .
It isn ’ t easy .
In fact , it can be both costly and painful .
So it ’ s no wonder that large numbers have been cowed into keeping silent .
Even those who smell a rat still largely keep their opinions to themselves .
That ’ s tragic because one of our most cherished freedoms is the freedom of opinion—and the right to express it .
It is our great equalizer .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ been subdued by a very small number of people who have decided that their opinion is more equal than others .
And they ’ ve managed to indoctrinate—or at least intimidate—a sufficient number of people who have tacitly accepted it .
And those who have resisted have been censored .
Fear is a tremendously powerful emotion , and it is easily exploited to reinforce ignorance—which is also essential to advancing what I call the COVID agenda .
Moreover , fear not only reduces resistance to authority , it actually quells dissent .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a functioning democratic republic .
Remove that element , and it is no longer a functioning democratic republic !
This is not rocket science .
So if you want a free society , now is the time to speak up .
Let your dissenting voice be heard , fears be damned .
Hopefully , my little book will equip and encourage even a small number of people to do just that—to exercise the power they actually possess to turn fear into action .
Maria : What is your personal take on the COVID @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you think it connects to topics such as the global reset , mandated vaccinations , one-world government , division through politics and racism , track and trace , artificial intelligence ( AI ) and transhumanism ?
John : That ’ s a handful , but those topics really do cover the waterfront .
I think Occam ’ s razor is a good place to start .
It is popularly translated as , “ the simplest explanation is usually the correct one.
” This is actually the opposite of conspiracy theory , which often @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are more likely .
So as you plumb the depths of this deep , seemingly bottomless COVID well , you don ’ t have to venture too deeply before the simplest explanation begins to emerge .
And it ’ s the same principle that applies in civil court , where conclusions are based on a preponderance of the evidence .
Under the preponderance standard , the burden of proof is met when there is a greater than 50 % chance that the claim is true .
In the case of COVID-19 , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So what is the evidence ?
Well , for starters , the alarmingly aggressive suppression of proper science in favor of propagating pseudoscience .
Let ’ s list a few more : • the unprecedented quarantining of the healthy population ; • the enforcement of public policies that can only exacerbate and sustain the situation ; • the blatant disregard for the deadly collateral damage that utterly swamps the effects of the virus—even according to the absurd worst-case models ; • the massive financial incentives for falsifying diagnoses and death certificates ; • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to contain a virus that is no more consequential than a bad seasonal flu ; • the demonstrably fraudulent testing and reporting of results ; • the unrelenting barrage of fear-inducing media to drive compliance and stifle resistance ; You get the idea .
I could go on….and I do in the book .
I ’ m really only scratching the surface here .
The inescapable conclusion is that NONE of these measures would be necessary if we were dealing with a true pandemic .
There would be no reason to manipulate and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about that !
There would be no political or ideological divide .
No rational person would be crying foul if this were the Black Death .
And all-cause death numbers bear this out .
So , the answer to your first question is that this is , by the overwhelming preponderance of evidence standard , a manufactured crisis motivated , promulgated , and sustained by powerful interests .
The second part of your question gets to why this has happened .
Again , remarkably , there is no effort to conceal the answer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chairman of the World Economic Forum , recently published a book called “ The Great Reset ” that expounds on all of it .
Additionally , WHO , CDC , GAVI , Fauci , Gates , and others have all declared unequivocally that the only path out of this crisis is through a needle—and a needle with strings attached : Their program of global vaccination is to be tied to such things as immunity passports .
This is actually an ingenious approach to global population control , which is to include restricting the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , go to school , buy and sell… It ’ s also a program that sets up convenient scapegoats : those who will not comply .
And that ’ s something we ’ re already witnessing .
We recently saw Fauci , for example , bemoaning the possibility of anti-vaxxers who could “ ruin everything.
” This is an important point .
Any study of totalitarian movements shows that their programs actually require scapegoats .
That ’ s actually built into the specification .
It ’ s very effective .
So we need @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interesting is it that the personas and profiles that comprise these scapegoats also happen to have particular political and faith-based alignments !
The myriad double standards being enforced now are truly astounding .
As to contact tracing , artificial intelligence ( AI ) , and the rest , these are valuable and powerful tools that are already being horrendously abused—even while our health and governmental authorities are imploring us to trust them .
Look , I am a technologist .
I have significant patents in RFID and I architect complex AI systems .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ – one of the leading economic and technological thinkers of the past forty years who happens to be the author of nineteen books – and other prominent futurists to forecast the trajectories and convergences of technologies .
I am well acquainted with the potential for its abuse and the fact that AI is far ahead of any legislative efforts to regulate or control it .
But that ’ s a topic for another day !
Suffice it to say that tracing and AI are all being used by the architects of the COVID @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sophisticated and extremely well-funded ; they occupy positions of power and influence , and consequently , should never be underestimated .
Maria : You wrote a sidebar detailing the suspension of global vaccination programs among third world countries by the WHO , GAVI , and the CDC due to COVID lockdown measures as being detrimental to the health of “ more than a hundred million children to completely unnecessary death and misery at the hands of preventable diseases in order to slow the spread of a fairly innocuous cousin of the common cold.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ up by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , the organization ’ s biggest donor .
GAVI is involved with government vaccination policies all around the world .
We know that Bill Gates , a known eugenicist , has openly claimed his desire to reduce the world population and has cited vaccination as one of the quickest routes to doing so .
We know about the lies and corruption at the CDC .
We know that no vaccines undergo adequate safety testing and can cause injury and death .
Why , then , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ initiatives a bad thing ?
What do you believe to be the true motivation behind these organization ’ s policies and what are the questions you hope readers will ask ?
John : This is the most important question of all , and I ’ m glad you asked it .
For the sake of discussion , let ’ s set aside any misgivings about vaccines , just for the moment .
In fact , let ’ s imagine that vaccines really are perfectly safe and effective .
After all , this is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Gates have insisted , so let ’ s use this assumption as a vehicle for examining the scenario they ’ ve already set in motion .
Now , if I believe that vaccines are crucial to the health of the world—particularly vaccines that are intended to stem the tide of the multiple horrible infectious diseases that plague Third World countries—then I am going to fight for them , right ?
And they have .
In fact , nothing could be more important to an organization that calls itself the World Health Organization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus that these very organizations actually know to be mostly innocuous for the vast majority of those who contract it , particularly children .
So what do they do ?
They halt all the vaccination programs for diseases they just told us could kill more than a hundred million people !
And this , of course , calls into question what these global health agencies really believe about the purpose of vaccines !
This is important because it exposes two disturbing things about this agenda .
First , the coronavirus presents a strategic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for a global vaccination program—and not just for children , but for adults .
This is an opportunity to vaccinate every person on the planet – all 7-billion-plus of us .
And we ’ re all expected to receive at least two shots .
That ’ s the ultimate jackpot—and they have accomplished this over a virus that is no more deadly than the seasonal flu .
But what about the 100 million children they say could die as a direct consequence of the suspended vaccine programs , ostensibly designed to prevent “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them .
THIS is what they have actually called “ a devil ’ s choice.
” Those are their words .
This leads us to the second aspect of this agenda .
These people believe they are in a position to make these kinds of decisions over all the citizens of the world .
The hubris is astronomical .
To my way of thinking , this is the very definition of psychopathy .
And this is what I am exposing in this particular sidebar—the incredible “ scorched Earth ” lengths they are willing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their globalist goals .
This is not mere hyperbole or speculation—they ’ re actually on record with this ; they ’ re quite transparent about it all .
No conspiracy theory required !
That said , in my book I began to introduce many dangers associated with vaccines—and particularly the wholly unethical ways pharma companies are pursuing a coronavirus vaccine .
I cover this in a chapter called “ A Shot in the Dark , ” and these will be greatly expanded upon in the forthcoming sequel to the book .
But again @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making here is simply to expose the unmitigated evil of the people who are orchestrating this massive campaign of fear and intimidation to advance their particular version of the future .
As a professional futurist , I don ’ t much care for their version .
If we want to create our preferred version of the future—one based on abundance and freedom and human flourishing—then we ’ re going to have to fight for it .
And fight like hell .
So I ask readers , which version of the future do you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you willing to do—or even sacrifice—to help it prevail over the competing versions ?
That ’ s ultimately what this whole thing is about : we ’ re in an existential fight for the lives and freedoms of our children .
Maria : Your second sidebar entitled Epidemics & Identity Politics details Oregon ’ s Lincoln County Health and Human Services policy which stated that all residents must wear a mask indoors and outdoors where social distancing can not be maintained with one caveat : the order exempts blacks due to unfounded concerns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does an order which so blatantly disregards the health for which it was applied , and also contribute to the hate and divisiveness which has been steadily plaguing our country for the last several months ?
John : This example really serves to illustrate the political nature of the pandemic response .
Not only is it fundamentally unscientific , it actually runs in direct opposition to good policy .
While blacks may be more vulnerable to the outcome of infection—many do suffer higher rates of hypertension , which has been identified as leading @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the detriment of a targeted population .
This is clearly discriminatory .
It shows that these health officials are not concerned at all with health , but rather the opportunity to exploit a crisis to practice social engineering .
It strikes me as fundamentally racist , if not eugenic .
I have written in-depth on this topic in my other books , but suffice to say that identity politics is inherently divisive .
But to exploit it as part of an official pandemic response is just unconscionable—the merits of the pandemic notwithstanding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I am very interested in the possibility of stripping away all demographic labels to bring everything down to the level of the individual person , standing alone , a miracle of life created in the very image of God—whether or not the person even recognizes that amazing fact .
I think we have to start there .
Until we are able to transcend our respective embodiments to connect at the level of our basic humanity—and that calls for a whole lot of love—we will see continued , if not escalating , grief .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who refuse to wear a mask , social distance or stay locked in their homes are the reason this virus is still hanging around and why we are continuing to lose our civil liberties ?
John : This might surprise you , but I don ’ t say anything to them .
And that is my advice to others .
Every day we see in the news yet another story of some altercation over masks .
There ’ s just no profit in that .
It is important to realize that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ divided roughly into three groups : • 1 ) those who understand that the pandemic response has been appropriated and promulgated by motivated interests—and are committed to stopping it , • 2 ) those who are not quite sure about what ’ s going on , but might actually be open to learn , and • 3 ) those who have drunk the COVID Kool-Aid .
I don ’ t believe anything can be said or done with respect to the latter .
A certain number of people are never going to give @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interest is in # 2 .
That ’ s where our energy should be focused .
If we can win them over with critical thinking , sound science , and maybe a little enlightenment about the powers that be and a good dose of love , then we would see a very good outcome and a positive direction for the future of our constitutional republic .
That really is what ’ s at stake .
And that ’ s why groups such as the United Medical Freedom Super PAC are so vital .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a personal experience where someone challenged a decision you made regarding masks , distancing , or lockdowns ?
How did you handle it ?
What was the outcome ?
John : Whenever possible , I try not to engage in that two-dimensional space where everything is either left or right , black or white .
It ’ s more interesting in engaging in the Z axis—a dimension where we can gain entirely new perspectives .
So rather than arguing one point over another—and I say this having just written a book that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people that I am choosing my particular practice of going without a mask and resisting the lockdowns out of solidarity with the millions of innocent victims of this epic crime against humanity .
And then I invite them to learn more .
Actually , many take me up on the invitation .
And you know why ?
Because many simply haven ’ t thought very deeply about it .
It ’ s amazing , but it is true .
This is both a problem and an opportunity .
I wrote A Devil ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ help those conversations yield fruit .
The information is important , but it can be better received if it can come from a perspective they ’ ve never considered—a perspective that can also serve to transcend the fear .
We could all do with a bit of wisdom on that front .
Maria : You mentioned working on your next book .
Could you tell us what it will be about ?
John : A Devil ’ s Choice really lays for the foundation for understanding the true nature of the pandemic , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the global response to it .
For many , the pandemic has been an eye-opener .
It certainly was for me as I researched it .
The organizing principle for my next book gets to the very heart of the virus crisis—and what ’ s driving both sides of the narrative : information , misinformation , and disinformation .
Given the current media environment and high-octane politics behind the COVID agenda , it can be difficult to sort it all out .
Disinformation is the most powerful weapon in the world today and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recognize and neutralize it .
The idea is to put things to the test , to equip , encourage , and enable people to sniff out and reject the propaganda in all its forms .
But as evidenced by its phenomenal success , it is easier said than done .
I hope the combination of the two books will help make this a little easier .
My next book will also take a deeper dive into the slippery slope of contact tracing , which is driven by COVID tests that are not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are easily manipulated , and are actually no more accurate than a coin toss .
But boy , are they useful for ramping up numbers of so-called “ cases.
” Like epidemiological models that never say what they are not told to say , the RT-PCR tests being used to diagnose COVID cases also obeys their masters to yield only the desired results .
When people come to understand how this whole system works—and how it will drive a surveillance state with contact tracing—they will be very disturbed by it .
I personally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , especially if I exhibit no symptoms .
People should also know that contact tracing is likewise fraught with the potential for statistically significant false positives .
In other words , this whole thing is ripe for abuse , fraud , discrimination , reprisals , scammers , and more bad news .
Beyond this , my current book “ A Devil ’ s Choice , ” exposes the shocking depth of corruption in WHO-sponsored research that is driving public policy .
Some of this “ science ” is so bad that even those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by it .
And this includes the junk science being used to discredit a whole raft of treatments that are actually amassing remarkable numbers of complete recoveries .
Not that this keeps the press and the pundits from running with it .
After all , disinformation and Maria : Could you tell us more about your organization Dissenting Voices ?
John : Dissenting Voices is an outgrowth of my organization , Abundant World Institute , a public benefit corporation .
It became clear to me early on that the COVID agenda poses a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ value , and so we ’ re here to put up a fight .
Dissenting Voices was actually created in response to the pandemic , and specifically to answer the disturbing extent of censorship our many friends in this fight are experiencing .
Equally consequential , when dissenting voices are silenced , innovation itself is quashed .
Worse , original ideas and the products of critical thinking are displaced by the kinds of deadly groupthink that ultimately yield dystopian dysfunction—in spite of an “ apparent intent ” of serving the public good , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , purposefully deceptive , or actually nefarious .
So we ’ re building the Dissenting Voices platform because whenever , wherever freedom is diminished , so too is the hope of human flourishing—and the abundance of the good , the true , and the beautiful that attends it .
The Devil ’ s Choice is an eBook ; it is just $ 2.99 and the proceeds benefit Dissenting Voices .
Maria Ryan is a freelance content writer .
She has contributed to a number of online publications on topics such as fitness , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parenting .
She is an avid reader and book reviewer and works to promote indie authors and their books .
She runs the book review blog : bemisreviewsbooks.com .
John Schroeter is Executive Director at Abundant World Institute .
Comprising a society of the world ’ s foremost technologists , futurists , and entrepreneurs , Abundant World Institute is a social enterprise dedicated to identifying and defining exponential solutions to global grand challenges in several areas of tremendous human consequence : energy , healthcare , education , and the environment .
Schroeter is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ World of Abundance , with Naveen Jain and Sir Richard Branson , and editor of After Shock , a compendium of essays by the world ’ s foremost futurists observing the 50 year anniversary of Alvin and Heidi Toffler ’ s Future Shock .
He is the publisher of the iconic Popular Electronics , Mechanix Illustrated , and Popular Astronomy magazines , hosted at TechnicaCuriosa.com .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our list .

Interviewed and written by Maria Ryan
Covid-19 A Devil’s Choice is a literal timeline detailing the beginning of what is called the COVID-19 pandemic to our current state of affairs. It is written in a numbered format from 1 to 100. Following this is a doctor-driven discussion regarding the virus itself and the dangers it poses to society at large. For a deeper discussion into the book, what it means for all of us, along with actionable steps we can take to dispel fear and understand the larger context of what’s happening, I interviewed the author, John Schroeter, asking questions I hope will impart knowledge and expand the conversation. His detailed and thoughtful answers, as well as his rich perspective, will inform and educate in these times of great confusion. Get ready to connect the dots.
Maria: Your book details the sequence of events from what we know about the inception of the virus known as SARS-CoV2 to where we are today, on the precipice of a new world that can only be changed through our own consciousness. You follow up with a discussion with Jane M. Orient, M.D., part of her paper ‘A Perspective on SARS-CoV2, the Most Dangerous Virus in History.’ What do you hope readers will take away after reading your book?
John: Thank you so much, Maria. I sincerely hope the book will spark some latent curiosity, to encourage people to start asking questions about what’s really going on. I hope readers will be moved to start testing the prevailing narrative, and not simply accept the course of events without challenge. I hope they’ll do the math and discover that what’s being promulgated as authoritative “settled science” with respect to this virus and the measures taken to contain it are actually anything but. I do believe if more people did just this much, this whole thing would crumble like the house of cards built on sand that it actually is.
This is what I set out to do in this book: to take the claims to task, point by point. In fact, the inspiration for the “100 points” format was Martin Luther’s 95 Theses—points of contention that he nailed to the door in order to spur debate and dialog. That was his original intent. And it’s my intent to nail these 100 points to the virtual door of the world in order to stimulate thought, discussion, learning, and discovery about what is arguably the most consequential event in our history. Sadly, though, instead of discussion, it would also be an act of resistance, because the free exchange of ideas is being suppressed across this country in ways that look alarmingly like Stasi tactics. So I hope that readers will become emboldened as they come to understand what’s really behind this crisis.
Maria: Thank you for those thoughts. What would be one actionable step, big or small, that a person could take right now to change their consciousness from fear to empowerment?
John: At the end of the book, I detail 10 things people can do right now to empower themselves. But you’ve really nailed the problem on the head with the keyword fear. In fact, five of the 10 suggestions are concerned with fear. But it’s a complex fear. Besides what we understand to be an irrational fear of the virus, there are other forms of fear that can be just as debilitating. At the forefront is the fear that Martin Luther King described when he wrote, “Many people fear nothing more terribly than to take a position which stands out sharply and clearly from the prevailing opinion.”
We see just how true that is, for example, with the mass, sheep-like compliance to mask mandates. No one wants to be the outlier. No one wants to be ostracized. No one wants to stand apart from “prevailing opinion” and risk ridicule or scorn or be told they’re threatening lives with their selfishness. This is particularly insidious because, in the case of mask mandates, they are a very visible form of compliance that actually reinforces the fear, and hence the mass submission. It’s a feedback loop that continuously gains power. The only way to break that feedback loop is to take on the fear directly. And it’s going to take some doing for some people to venture this. It isn’t easy. In fact, it can be both costly and painful.
So it’s no wonder that large numbers have been cowed into keeping silent. Even those who smell a rat still largely keep their opinions to themselves. That’s tragic because one of our most cherished freedoms is the freedom of opinion—and the right to express it. It is our great equalizer. Lately, however, that freedom has been subdued by a very small number of people who have decided that their opinion is more equal than others. And they’ve managed to indoctrinate—or at least intimidate—a sufficient number of people who have tacitly accepted it. And those who have resisted have been censored.
Fear is a tremendously powerful emotion, and it is easily exploited to reinforce ignorance—which is also essential to advancing what I call the COVID agenda. Moreover, fear not only reduces resistance to authority, it actually quells dissent. But dissent lies at the very heart of a functioning democratic republic. Remove that element, and it is no longer a functioning democratic republic! This is not rocket science. So if you want a free society, now is the time to speak up. Let your dissenting voice be heard, fears be damned. Hopefully, my little book will equip and encourage even a small number of people to do just that—to exercise the power they actually possess to turn fear into action.
Maria: What is your personal take on the COVID situation as a whole? How do you think it connects to topics such as the global reset, mandated vaccinations, one-world government, division through politics and racism, track and trace, artificial intelligence (AI) and transhumanism?
John: That’s a handful, but those topics really do cover the waterfront. I think Occam’s razor is a good place to start. It is popularly translated as, “the simplest explanation is usually the correct one.” This is actually the opposite of conspiracy theory, which often stands in opposition to other explanations that are more likely.
So as you plumb the depths of this deep, seemingly bottomless COVID well, you don’t have to venture too deeply before the simplest explanation begins to emerge. And it’s the same principle that applies in civil court, where conclusions are based on a preponderance of the evidence. Under the preponderance standard, the burden of proof is met when there is a greater than 50% chance that the claim is true. In the case of COVID-19, we’re well past 50%.
So what is the evidence? Well, for starters, the alarmingly aggressive suppression of proper science in favor of propagating pseudoscience. Let’s list a few more:
the unprecedented quarantining of the healthy population;
epidemiological models crafted to predict Armageddon;
the enforcement of public policies that can only exacerbate and sustain the situation;
the blatant disregard for the deadly collateral damage that utterly swamps the effects of the virus—even according to the absurd worst-case models;
the massive financial incentives for falsifying diagnoses and death certificates;
the deliberate decimation of a world economy to contain a virus that is no more consequential than a bad seasonal flu;
the demonstrably fraudulent testing and reporting of results;
the unrelenting barrage of fear-inducing media to drive compliance and stifle resistance;
the wholesale censorship of dissenting voices.
You get the idea. I could go on….and I do in the book. I’m really only scratching the surface here. The inescapable conclusion is that NONE of these measures would be necessary if we were dealing with a true pandemic.
There would be no reason to manipulate and distort information and strong-arm compliance. Think about that! There would be no political or ideological divide. No rational person would be crying foul if this were the Black Death. And all-cause death numbers bear this out. So, the answer to your first question is that this is, by the overwhelming preponderance of evidence standard, a manufactured crisis motivated, promulgated, and sustained by powerful interests.
The second part of your question gets to why this has happened. Again, remarkably, there is no effort to conceal the answer. Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, recently published a book called “The Great Reset” that expounds on all of it. Additionally, WHO, CDC, GAVI, Fauci, Gates, and others have all declared unequivocally that the only path out of this crisis is through a needle—and a needle with strings attached: Their program of global vaccination is to be tied to such things as immunity passports. This is actually an ingenious approach to global population control, which is to include restricting the means to travel, work, socialize, go to school, buy and sell… It’s also a program that sets up convenient scapegoats: those who will not comply.
And that’s something we’re already witnessing. We recently saw Fauci, for example, bemoaning the possibility of anti-vaxxers who could “ruin everything.” This is an important point. Any study of totalitarian movements shows that their programs actually require scapegoats. That’s actually built into the specification. It’s very effective. So we need a heads-up about this. And how interesting is it that the personas and profiles that comprise these scapegoats also happen to have particular political and faith-based alignments! The myriad double standards being enforced now are truly astounding.
As to contact tracing, artificial intelligence (AI), and the rest, these are valuable and powerful tools that are already being horrendously abused—even while our health and governmental authorities are imploring us to trust them. Look, I am a technologist. I have significant patents in RFID and I architect complex AI systems. I work with people like George Gilder – one of the leading economic and technological thinkers of the past forty years who happens to be the author of nineteen books – and other prominent futurists to forecast the trajectories and convergences of technologies. I am well acquainted with the potential for its abuse and the fact that AI is far ahead of any legislative efforts to regulate or control it.
But that’s a topic for another day! Suffice it to say that tracing and AI are all being used by the architects of the COVID game plan. These people are very sophisticated and extremely well-funded; they occupy positions of power and influence, and consequently, should never be underestimated.
Maria: You wrote a sidebar detailing the suspension of global vaccination programs among third world countries by the WHO, GAVI, and the CDC due to COVID lockdown measures as being detrimental to the health of “more than a hundred million children to completely unnecessary death and misery at the hands of preventable diseases in order to slow the spread of a fairly innocuous cousin of the common cold.”
We know that GAVI was set up by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the organization’s biggest donor. GAVI is involved with government vaccination policies all around the world. We know that Bill Gates, a known eugenicist, has openly claimed his desire to reduce the world population and has cited vaccination as one of the quickest routes to doing so. We know about the lies and corruption at the CDC. We know that no vaccines undergo adequate safety testing and can cause injury and death.
Why, then, is the suspension of these global vaccination initiatives a bad thing? What do you believe to be the true motivation behind these organization’s policies and what are the questions you hope readers will ask?
John: This is the most important question of all, and I’m glad you asked it. For the sake of discussion, let’s set aside any misgivings about vaccines, just for the moment. In fact, let’s imagine that vaccines really are perfectly safe and effective. After all, this is what WHO, CDC, GAVI, and Gates have insisted, so let’s use this assumption as a vehicle for examining the scenario they’ve already set in motion.
Now, if I believe that vaccines are crucial to the health of the world—particularly vaccines that are intended to stem the tide of the multiple horrible infectious diseases that plague Third World countries—then I am going to fight for them, right? And they have. In fact, nothing could be more important to an organization that calls itself the World Health Organization. But then along comes the coronavirus—a virus that these very organizations actually know to be mostly innocuous for the vast majority of those who contract it, particularly children.
So what do they do? They halt all the vaccination programs for diseases they just told us could kill more than a hundred million people! And this, of course, calls into question what these global health agencies really believe about the purpose of vaccines!
This is important because it exposes two disturbing things about this agenda. First, the coronavirus presents a strategic, once-in-a-generation opportunity to create the conditions for a global vaccination program—and not just for children, but for adults. This is an opportunity to vaccinate every person on the planet – all 7-billion-plus of us. And we’re all expected to receive at least two shots. That’s the ultimate jackpot—and they have accomplished this over a virus that is no more deadly than the seasonal flu.
But what about the 100 million children they say could die as a direct consequence of the suspended vaccine programs, ostensibly designed to prevent “real” diseases? To hell with them. THIS is what they have actually called “a devil’s choice.” Those are their words.
This leads us to the second aspect of this agenda. These people believe they are in a position to make these kinds of decisions over all the citizens of the world. The hubris is astronomical. To my way of thinking, this is the very definition of psychopathy. And this is what I am exposing in this particular sidebar—the incredible “scorched Earth” lengths they are willing to go to in order to advance their globalist goals. This is not mere hyperbole or speculation—they’re actually on record with this; they’re quite transparent about it all. No conspiracy theory required!
That said, in my book I began to introduce many dangers associated with vaccines—and particularly the wholly unethical ways pharma companies are pursuing a coronavirus vaccine. I cover this in a chapter called “A Shot in the Dark,” and these will be greatly expanded upon in the forthcoming sequel to the book.
But again, the larger point I’m making here is simply to expose the unmitigated evil of the people who are orchestrating this massive campaign of fear and intimidation to advance their particular version of the future. As a professional futurist, I don’t much care for their version. If we want to create our preferred version of the future—one based on abundance and freedom and human flourishing—then we’re going to have to fight for it. And fight like hell.
So I ask readers, which version of the future do you want to live? And what are you willing to do—or even sacrifice—to help it prevail over the competing versions? That’s ultimately what this whole thing is about: we’re in an existential fight for the lives and freedoms of our children.
Maria: Your second sidebar entitled Epidemics & Identity Politics details Oregon’s Lincoln County Health and Human Services policy which stated that all residents must wear a mask indoors and outdoors where social distancing cannot be maintained with one caveat: the order exempts blacks due to unfounded concerns about racial profiling and harassment. How does an order which so blatantly disregards the health for which it was applied, and also contribute to the hate and divisiveness which has been steadily plaguing our country for the last several months?
John: This example really serves to illustrate the political nature of the pandemic response. Not only is it fundamentally unscientific, it actually runs in direct opposition to good policy. While blacks may be more vulnerable to the outcome of infection—many do suffer higher rates of hypertension, which has been identified as leading comorbidity—public policy must never discriminate, particularly to the detriment of a targeted population. This is clearly discriminatory. It shows that these health officials are not concerned at all with health, but rather the opportunity to exploit a crisis to practice social engineering. It strikes me as fundamentally racist, if not eugenic.
I have written in-depth on this topic in my other books, but suffice to say that identity politics is inherently divisive. But to exploit it as part of an official pandemic response is just unconscionable—the merits of the pandemic notwithstanding.
In my work and research, I am very interested in the possibility of stripping away all demographic labels to bring everything down to the level of the individual person, standing alone, a miracle of life created in the very image of God—whether or not the person even recognizes that amazing fact. I think we have to start there. Until we are able to transcend our respective embodiments to connect at the level of our basic humanity—and that calls for a whole lot of love—we will see continued, if not escalating, grief.
Maria: What would you say to those who beleive that refusal to wear a mask, social distance or stay locked in their homes are the reasons this virus is still hanging around and why we are continuing to lose our civil liberties?
John: This might surprise you, but I don’t say anything to them. And that is my advice to others. Every day we see in the news yet another story of some altercation over masks. There’s just no profit in that. It is important to realize that the general disposition on the pandemic can be divided roughly into three groups:
1) those who understand that the pandemic response has been appropriated and promulgated by motivated interests—and are committed to stopping it,
2) those who are not quite sure about what’s going on, but might actually be open to learn, and
3) those who have drunk the COVID Kool-Aid.
I don’t believe anything can be said or done with respect to the latter. A certain number of people are never going to give up this COVID path. My real interest is in #2. That’s where our energy should be focused. If we can win them over with critical thinking, sound science, and maybe a little enlightenment about the powers that be and a good dose of love, then we would see a very good outcome and a positive direction for the future of our constitutional republic. That really is what’s at stake. And that’s why groups such as the United Medical Freedom Super PAC are so vital.
Maria: Could you give an example of a personal experience where someone challenged a decision you made regarding masks, distancing, or lockdowns? How did you handle it? What was the outcome?
John: Whenever possible, I try not to engage in that two-dimensional space where everything is either left or right, black or white. It’s more interesting in engaging in the Z axis—a dimension where we can gain entirely new perspectives. So rather than arguing one point over another—and I say this having just written a book that argues 100 points!—I simply tell people that I am choosing my particular practice of going without a mask and resisting the lockdowns out of solidarity with the millions of innocent victims of this epic crime against humanity. And then I invite them to learn more.
Actually, many take me up on the invitation. And you know why? Because many simply haven’t thought very deeply about it. It’s amazing, but it is true. This is both a problem and an opportunity. I wrote A Devil’s Choice and the forthcoming sequel to help those conversations yield fruit. The information is important, but it can be better received if it can come from a perspective they’ve never considered—a perspective that can also serve to transcend the fear. We could all do with a bit of wisdom on that front.
Maria: You mentioned working on your next book. Could you tell us what it will be about?
John: A Devil’s Choice really lays for the foundation for understanding the true nature of the pandemic, what’s behind it, and the global response to it. For many, the pandemic has been an eye-opener. It certainly was for me as I researched it.
The organizing principle for my next book gets to the very heart of the virus crisis—and what’s driving both sides of the narrative: information, misinformation, and disinformation. Given the current media environment and high-octane politics behind the COVID agenda, it can be difficult to sort it all out. Disinformation is the most powerful weapon in the world today and we all need to learn how to recognize and neutralize it. The idea is to put things to the test, to equip, encourage, and enable people to sniff out and reject the propaganda in all its forms. But as evidenced by its phenomenal success, it is easier said than done. I hope the combination of the two books will help make this a little easier.
My next book will also take a deeper dive into the slippery slope of contact tracing, which is driven by COVID tests that are not only not fit for the purpose, they are easily manipulated, and are actually no more accurate than a coin toss. But boy, are they useful for ramping up numbers of so-called “cases.” Like epidemiological models that never say what they are not told to say, the RT-PCR tests being used to diagnose COVID cases also obeys their masters to yield only the desired results. When people come to understand how this whole system works—and how it will drive a surveillance state with contact tracing—they will be very disturbed by it.
I personally will never submit to a PCR test, especially if I exhibit no symptoms. People should also know that contact tracing is likewise fraught with the potential for statistically significant false positives. In other words, this whole thing is ripe for abuse, fraud, discrimination, reprisals, scammers, and more bad news.
Beyond this, my current book “A Devil’s Choice,” exposes the shocking depth of corruption in WHO-sponsored research that is driving public policy. Some of this “science” is so bad that even those who support the COVID agenda are embarrassed by it. And this includes the junk science being used to discredit a whole raft of treatments that are actually amassing remarkable numbers of complete recoveries. Not that this keeps the press and the pundits from running with it. After all, disinformation is their stock in trade.
Maria: Could you tell us more about your organization Dissenting Voices?
John: Dissenting Voices is an outgrowth of my organization, Abundant World Institute, a public benefit corporation. It became clear to me early on that the COVID agenda poses a serious threat to everything we believe and value, and so we’re here to put up a fight. Dissenting Voices was actually created in response to the pandemic, and specifically to answer the disturbing extent of censorship our many friends in this fight are experiencing.
Equally consequential, when dissenting voices are silenced, innovation itself is quashed. Worse, original ideas and the products of critical thinking are displaced by the kinds of deadly groupthink that ultimately yield dystopian dysfunction—in spite of an “apparent intent” of serving the public good, whether that intent is well-meaning but misguided, purposefully deceptive, or actually nefarious. So we’re building the Dissenting Voices platform because whenever, wherever freedom is diminished, so too is the hope of human flourishing—and the abundance of the good, the true, and the beautiful that attends it. The Devil’s Choice is an eBook; it is $2.99 and the proceeds benefit Dissenting Voices.
====================
Maria Ryan is a freelance content writer. She has contributed to a number of online publications on topics such as fitness, nutrition, food, lifestyle, and parenting. She is an avid reader and book reviewer and works to promote indie authors and their books. She runs the book review blog: bemisreviewsbooks.com.
John Schroeter is Executive Director at Abundant World Institute. Comprising a society of the world’s foremost technologists, futurists, and entrepreneurs, Abundant World Institute is a social enterprise dedicated to identifying and defining exponential solutions to global grand challenges in several areas of tremendous human consequence: energy, healthcare, education, and the environment. Schroeter is co-author of the award-winning book Moonshots–Creating a World of Abundance, with Naveen Jain and Sir Richard Branson, and editor of After Shock, a compendium of essays by the world’s foremost futurists observing the 50 year anniversary of Alvin and Heidi Toffler’s Future Shock. He is the publisher of the iconic Popular Electronics, Mechanix Illustrated, and Popular Astronomy magazines, hosted at TechnicaCuriosa.com.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow. Join our list.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


vaxxter--2020-08-31--How Much More Can Americans Withstand?

How Much More Can Americans Withstand?

When I first was introduced into the problems associated with vaccines at the National Vaccine Information Center ( NVIC ) meeting in September 2000 , I was nearly overwhelmed by the amount of appalling information I was uncovering .
I needed help to process all the information and to sort it out .
Among my first mentors were Ingri Cassel , founder of Vaccine Liberation and her husband , Don Harkins , the editor of the Idaho Observer monthly newspaper .
After a few phone calls , we became life-long friends .
Whenever I called Idaho – to seek advice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the right path and wasn ’ t crazy , or to just mull over life ’ s unexplainable events – Don would most often answer the phone .
His chipper , lilting voice would greet me with , “ Idaho Observer !
” I would smile and retort , “ So , what are you observing in Idaho today ?
” Never missing a beat , Don would recognize my voice , and with unforgettable charm and his hallmark giggle , he would respond , “ Well hello there !
” He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hot story ” of the day , sharing what he was writing , researching , or pondering .
No matter how busy or how pressed for time , Don always carved out space for me to share his wit , to generate a few laughs , and to tell unforgettable stories .
He always made me feel special .
At that moment , I was the most important person in the world for which he ’ d drop everything and give his full attention .
More likely than not , he did the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his assessments of world events were sometimes disturbing , they were always spot-on .
Don ’ s wisdom ran deep , and the years of banter and debate contributed substantially to my personal growth .
I will always cherish the many thought-provoking “ Don-isms ” , delivered in a way that all of us knew so well as “ typically Don.
” On September 27 , 2009 , the world lost a Giant Placeholder for truth , freedom , and liberty .
Don ’ s work will live on through the hundreds of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ style .
This article , “ Are Americans Dying for Martial Law ?
” has long remained one of my favorites .
It is a timeless example of Don ’ s quest to explain the madness in the world around us .
This article takes the perspective of Congress writing a letter to the American people .
While written in 1998 , with minimal grammatical modifications , this piece couldn ’ t be more spot-on if it were written today in 2020 .
Don Harkins was instrumental in shaping and guiding the lives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see .
His tutelage has helped me to this day be a better writer and speaker .
A gentleman and a gentleman , I will always remember Don for his laughter and the love he selflessly gave to so many persons , from all walks of life .
I am proud to be counted among his friends .
Rest in peace , dear friend .
As you read through this article , keep in mind the date it was written : 1998 .
It ’ s an easy – and scary – reach @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about is coming to fruition today .
Will you please get mad enough already so that we can declare martial law ?
What is it going to take to get you mad enough so that we can finally justify ending this silly little game of thrust and parry with your constitutional rights by declaring a state of national emergency and get those pesky rights out of the way once and for all ?
We have pushed every button that we can think of and you refuse to get angry enough to engage in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ methodically stripped you of your constitutional and civil rights .
We have shot , bombed and burned hundreds of innocent men , women , children and dogs and cats .
We have fueled both sides of little wars all over the world with profits generated from the sale of drugs to your children which are purposefully being made stupider with every federal dollar that is contributed in the interest of their education .
We overrule your jury decisions and declare the initiatives and referendums you vote for unconstitutional .
We have unconstitutionally decided @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the most resource wealth are federal lands and are building gates to keep you out of them .
We are working to strip you of your right to keep and bear arms as fast as we can .
We have created trade agreements with foreign nations which are killing your ability to make a decent living and raise a family .
And we are taxing you to death to pay for all the evil things we are doing to you .
What is it going to take to make you get mad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last nail into your constitutional coffin ?
When are you going to rise up as a once-free people and oppose us ?
When are you going to provide us with the collective indignation that will give us justification to suspend forever the silly little document which is the only thing that stands between you and the slavery we want to give you to protect you from yourselves ?
Let us draw you a map If you were smart enough to read the publicly available documents which prove that in 1970 , Congress approved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you AIDS ( and has subsequently produced its much more efficient cousin Ebola ) and that the Department of Defense legally ( Title 50 , Chapter 32 , Section 1524 of the U.S. Code ) used 500,000 Gulf War-era soldiers as guinea pigs for a horrible cocktail of experimental substances , would all of you become angry as hell and generate the critical mass of social tension in this country that we feel will be necessary for us to justify a declaration of martial law ?
Why can ’ t you understand that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monster that is hell-bent on reducing inalienably sovereign citizens to the status of slaves who exist as an expendable pool of human resources ?
How can you just sit their like sheep while we steal all of your property , ruin your businesses , and spend billions of your dollars , researching ways to kill you more efficiently ?
What is the matter with you ?
We have even gone so far as to humiliate you by allowing untrustable , immoral presidents who has committed numerous felonies to remain in office .
What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to you before you get mad enough to attempt to hold us accountable for betraying you ?
When are you going to give us the excuse we need to justify our historically inevitable intentions : to declare martial law and reduce you to your rightful station in serfdom ?
( Nearly ) Every member of Congress Why are Americans dying for martial law ?
The federal government has made no secret of its elaborate and despotic plans to deal with a national emergency .
The plans are found in executive orders and in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public libraries .
A grade-school understanding of world history would have us understand that the federal government is likely to create the national emergency and that it intends to implement those elaborate and despotic national emergency plans at precisely the right moment in its incessant mission to transfer our inalienable individual liberties into dictatorial federal control .
The federal government has painstakingly drawn us a three-dimensional , full-color map of how it has betrayed all of us , including its military personnel , by facilitating , if not initiating , the epidemic of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ menus and cocktails of man-made chemical and biological substances against which we are virtually defenseless .
Why would it do that ?
Because it is frustrated in its inability to get a rise out of the American people that is significant enough to justify a declaration of martial law no matter how blatantly it abuses and murders us .
The American people are so fat , lazy , stupid and apathetic that even when the federal government draws us a neon-colored map which illustrates an obvious plan to make us agonizingly sick for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths , Americans will not demand accountability .
Is there anything that the federal government could have done to make it more obvious that it wished to be caught in the act of killing its own troops and infecting its own population with indefensible contagions ?
Understanding what is true based upon the federal government ’ s own documentation , is there anything left , short of indiscriminately rounding up and publicly executing innocent people because of something ridiculous like hair color , that will make the American people angry enough to generate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would justify the federal government ’ s declaration of martial law ?
Consider the following : • That at a congressional DoD appropriations hearing in 1970 , Congress gave the DOD $ 10 million for five years so that it could develop a contagion that is identical in its description to what we understand today to be AIDS ; • The world ’ s leading immunological researchers have published works and have stated publicly that they have been engaging in this type of research since the 60s and that Ebola is the fruit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certain test populations in New York , San Francisco and Africa were purposefully infected with AIDS ; • The government entities which documented their plans to go to war with Iraq in 1988 ; • The government entities which approved the documented sale of chemical and biological materials by American companies to Iraq and Iran from 1983 to as recently as 1993 ; • The government entities which knew that chemical and biological weapons were awaiting “ coalition ” forces in the Gulf ; • The government entities which inoculated their unsuspecting troops @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protect them ; • The government entities which knew what mustard gas , sarin gas , anthrax , and a full menu of other deadly toxins do to ravage the human body ; • The government entities which have incessantly denied that American troops were exposed to these contagions which were sold from the laboratories of American companies to support the biological weapons programs in Iraq and Iran prior to the war ; • The government entities which refuse to treat their soldiers , and now the spouses and children of soldiers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and eventually fatal symptoms they are enduring ; • The government entities which will prescribe psychotropic drugs like Prozac for those they view as mental patients but will not prescribe antibiotics to sick people because they still maintain that a disease that does not exist can not be treated .
Why aren ’ t we mad yet ?
Why won ’ t the painstakingly documented plot to kill us and ruin our children make us mad ?
The federal government , and the little men behind the curtain who actually run it , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American people whose inalienable rights it wants desperately to forever alienate through a declaration of martial law .
It is because we refuse to become collectively angered at the capital crimes that we are perversely paying public puppets to perpetrate upon us that is the cause of the deepening cycle of oppression that once-free Americans are suffering .
Once the sleeping American public understands that , contrary to the public position our government has maintained from the beginning , it created AIDS and Ebola [ and now COVID – ST ] with our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our troops to chemical and biological agents during the Gulf War , a declared state of emergency ( martial law ) will have to be declared in an attempt to restore a semblance of order to this justifiably outraged nation .
Was that the government ’ s plan for the World Trade Center Bombing ?
Waco ?
Ruby Ridge ?
Oklahoma City ?
TWA 800 ?
Was that why the government admitted , 30 years too late , that the second Gulf of Tonkin incident which was credited for U.S. ground troops being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Was the government trying , unsuccessfully , to make us mad enough so that it could declare martial law and strip us of the few rights that haven ’ t yet been completely alienated ?
It seems quite apparent that the federal government is either so stupid that it can not help documenting every evil , murderous , treasonous step it takes regardless of its potentially riotous consequences , or that it is purposefully documenting its unthinkably evil machinations with the intention of prodding us into riotousness that could warrant a declared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including AIDS , Ebola , and Gulf War Illness and incidents like Ruby Ridge and Waco , millions of people have died for martial law .
Since we as an apathetic people naively await federal justice to be dispensed from federal government determinations from federal government investigations of federal government transgressions by federal government employees , we can expect a few million more innocent people to die for martial law .
Are the American people so unbelievably apathetic that not even an insidious plan to kill us off and cripple our children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ become civilly disobedient enough to demand real investigations into the activities of a federal government which has slowly and methodically dismantled and destroyed our Constitutional Republic ?
We will soon find out .
But , never fear , if killing us and creating a generation of horribly birth-defective children won ’ t make us mad , if stealing all of our land and our resources and our businesses and teaching our children to be mindless , amoral idiots won ’ t make us mad , I hear that the federal government has imminent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , pre-1990 model automobiles .
That ought to make people pretty mad .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our list .

by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
When I first was introduced into the problems associated with vaccines at the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) meeting in September 2000, I was nearly overwhelmed by the amount of appalling information I was uncovering. I needed help to process all the information and to sort it out. Among my first mentors were Ingri Cassel, founder of Vaccine Liberation and her husband, Don Harkins, the editor of the Idaho Observer monthly newspaper.
After a few phone calls, we became life-long friends. Whenever I called Idaho – to seek advice, to get reassurance that I was on the right path and wasn’t crazy, or to just mull over life’s unexplainable events – Don would most often answer the phone. His chipper, lilting voice would greet me with, “Idaho Observer!” I would smile and retort, “So, what are you observing in Idaho today?”
Never missing a beat, Don would recognize my voice, and with unforgettable charm and his hallmark giggle, he would respond, “Well hello there!” He’d then launch into the “hot story” of the day, sharing what he was writing, researching, or pondering. No matter how busy or how pressed for time, Don always carved out space for me to share his wit, to generate a few laughs, and to tell unforgettable stories. He always made me feel special. At that moment, I was the most important person in the world for which he’d drop everything and give his full attention. More likely than not, he did the same for all his friends.
While his assessments of world events were sometimes disturbing, they were always spot-on. Don’s wisdom ran deep, and the years of banter and debate contributed substantially to my personal growth. I will always cherish the many thought-provoking “Don-isms”, delivered in a way that all of us knew so well as “typically Don.”
On September 19, 2009, the world lost a Giant Placeholder for truth, freedom, and liberty. Don’s work will live on through the hundreds of amazing pieces he crafted with insight and style. This article, “Are Americans Dying for Martial Law?” has long remained one of my favorites. It is a timeless example of Don’s quest to explain the madness in the world around us. This article takes the perspective of Congress writing a letter to the American people. While written in 1998, with minimal grammatical modifications, this piece couldn’t be more spot-on if it were written today in 2020.
Don Harkins was instrumental in shaping and guiding the lives of thousands who had the eyes to see. His tutelage has helped me to this day be a better writer and speaker. A gentleman and a gentleman, I will always remember Don for his laughter and the love he selflessly gave to so many persons, from all walks of life. I am proud to be counted among his friends. Rest in peace, dear friend.
As you read through this article, keep in mind the date it was written: 1998. It’s an easy – and scary – reach to see how everything that Don wrote about is coming to fruition today.
November 1998 Idaho Observer: Are Americans Dying for Martial Law?
Dearest Our Fellow Americans:
Will you please get mad enough already so that we can declare martial law?
What is it going to take to get you mad enough so that we can finally justify ending this silly little game of thrust and parry with your constitutional rights by declaring a state of national emergency and get those pesky rights out of the way once and for all?
We have pushed every button that we can think of and you refuse to get angry enough to engage in acts of social unrest: We have methodically stripped you of your constitutional and civil rights. We have shot, bombed and burned hundreds of innocent men, women, children and dogs and cats. We have fueled both sides of little wars all over the world with profits generated from the sale of drugs to your children which are purposefully being made stupider with every federal dollar that is contributed in the interest of their education. We overrule your jury decisions and declare the initiatives and referendums you vote for unconstitutional. We have unconstitutionally decided that the 62 percent of the country with the most resource wealth are federal lands and are building gates to keep you out of them. We are working to strip you of your right to keep and bear arms as fast as we can. We have created trade agreements with foreign nations which are killing your ability to make a decent living and raise a family. And we are taxing you to death to pay for all the evil things we are doing to you.
What is it going to take to make you get mad enough so we can finally pound the last nail into your constitutional coffin? When are you going to rise up as a once-free people and oppose us? When are you going to provide us with the collective indignation that will give us justification to suspend forever the silly little document which is the only thing that stands between you and the slavery we want to give you to protect you from yourselves?
Let us draw you a map
If you were smart enough to read the publicly available documents which prove that in 1970, Congress approved the funding of research that has given you AIDS (and has subsequently produced its much more efficient cousin Ebola) and that the Department of Defense legally (Title 50, Chapter 32, Section 1524 of the U.S. Code) used 500,000 Gulf War-era soldiers as guinea pigs for a horrible cocktail of experimental substances, would all of you become angry as hell and generate the critical mass of social tension in this country that we feel will be necessary for us to justify a declaration of martial law?
Damn you people.
Why can’t you understand that your government has evolved into an evil monster that is hell-bent on reducing inalienably sovereign citizens to the status of slaves who exist as an expendable pool of human resources? How can you just sit their like sheep while we steal all of your property, ruin your businesses, and spend billions of your dollars, researching ways to kill you more efficiently?
What is the matter with you? We have even gone so far as to humiliate you by allowing untrustable, immoral presidents who has committed numerous felonies to remain in office. What are we going to have to do to you before you get mad enough to attempt to hold us accountable for betraying you? When are you going to give us the excuse we need to justify our historically inevitable intentions: to declare martial law and reduce you to your rightful station in serfdom?
Sincerely,
(Nearly) Every member of Congress
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why are Americans dying for martial law?
The federal government has made no secret of its elaborate and despotic plans to deal with a national emergency. The plans are found in executive orders and in U.S. Code and are available in most public libraries.
A grade-school understanding of world history would have us understand that the federal government is likely to create the national emergency and that it intends to implement those elaborate and despotic national emergency plans at precisely the right moment in its incessant mission to transfer our inalienable individual liberties into dictatorial federal control.
The federal government has painstakingly drawn us a three-dimensional, full-color map of how it has betrayed all of us, including its military personnel, by facilitating, if not initiating, the epidemic of cancers and infections in our population with menus and cocktails of man-made chemical and biological substances against which we are virtually defenseless.
Why would it do that? Because it is frustrated in its inability to get a rise out of the American people that is significant enough to justify a declaration of martial law no matter how blatantly it abuses and murders us. The American people are so fat, lazy, stupid and apathetic that even when the federal government draws us a neon-colored map which illustrates an obvious plan to make us agonizingly sick for the several years prior to our eventual deaths, Americans will not demand accountability.
Is there anything that the federal government could have done to make it more obvious that it wished to be caught in the act of killing its own troops and infecting its own population with indefensible contagions? Understanding what is true based upon the federal government’s own documentation, is there anything left, short of indiscriminately rounding up and publicly executing innocent people because of something ridiculous like hair color, that will make the American people angry enough to generate a critical mass of public outrage that would justify the federal government’s declaration of martial law?
Consider the following:
That at a congressional DoD appropriations hearing in 1970, Congress gave the DOD $10 million for five years so that it could develop a contagion that is identical in its description to what we understand today to be AIDS;
The world’s leading immunological researchers have published works and have stated publicly that they have been engaging in this type of research since the 60s and that Ebola is the fruit of research that has been conducted since certain test populations in New York, San Francisco and Africa were purposefully infected with AIDS;
The government entities which documented their plans to go to war with Iraq in 1988;
The government entities which approved the documented sale of chemical and biological materials by American companies to Iraq and Iran from 1983 to as recently as 1993;
The government entities which knew that chemical and biological weapons were awaiting “coalition” forces in the Gulf;
The government entities which inoculated their unsuspecting troops with strange, experimental chemicals to supposedly protect them;
The government entities which knew what mustard gas, sarin gas, anthrax, and a full menu of other deadly toxins do to ravage the human body;
The government entities which have incessantly denied that American troops were exposed to these contagions which were sold from the laboratories of American companies to support the biological weapons programs in Iraq and Iran prior to the war;
The government entities which refuse to treat their soldiers, and now the spouses and children of soldiers, for the multitude of contagious, agonizing and eventually fatal symptoms they are enduring;
The government entities which will prescribe psychotropic drugs like Prozac for those they view as mental patients but will not prescribe antibiotics to sick people because they still maintain that a disease that does not exist cannot be treated.
Why aren’t we mad yet?
Why won’t the painstakingly documented plot to kill us and ruin our children make us mad?
The federal government, and the little men behind the curtain who actually run it, have continually overestimated the complacency of the American people whose inalienable rights it wants desperately to forever alienate through a declaration of martial law. It is because we refuse to become collectively angered at the capital crimes that we are perversely paying public puppets to perpetrate upon us that is the cause of the deepening cycle of oppression that once-free Americans are suffering.
Once the sleeping American public understands that, contrary to the public position our government has maintained from the beginning, it created AIDS and Ebola [and now COVID – ST] with our tax dollars and that it purposefully exposed our troops to chemical and biological agents during the Gulf War, a declared state of emergency (martial law) will have to be declared in an attempt to restore a semblance of order to this justifiably outraged nation.
Was that the government’s plan for the World Trade Center Bombing? Waco? Ruby Ridge? Oklahoma City? TWA 800? Was that why the government admitted, 30 years too late, that the second Gulf of Tonkin incident which was credited for U.S. ground troops being sent to Viet Nam never actually happened? Was the government trying, unsuccessfully, to make us mad enough so that it could declare martial law and strip us of the few rights that haven’t yet been completely alienated?
It seems quite apparent that the federal government is either so stupid that it cannot help documenting every evil, murderous, treasonous step it takes regardless of its potentially riotous consequences, or that it is purposefully documenting its unthinkably evil machinations with the intention of prodding us into riotousness that could warrant a declared state of national emergency.
By now, including AIDS, Ebola, and Gulf War Illness and incidents like Ruby Ridge and Waco, millions of people have died for martial law. Since we as an apathetic people naively await federal justice to be dispensed from federal government determinations from federal government investigations of federal government transgressions by federal government employees, we can expect a few million more innocent people to die for martial law.
Are the American people so unbelievably apathetic that not even an insidious plan to kill us off and cripple our children with birth defects will compel us to become civilly disobedient enough to demand real investigations into the activities of a federal government which has slowly and methodically dismantled and destroyed our Constitutional Republic?
We will soon find out. But, never fear, if killing us and creating a generation of horribly birth-defective children won’t make us mad, if stealing all of our land and our resources and our businesses and teaching our children to be mindless, amoral idiots won’t make us mad, I hear that the federal government has imminent plans to ban all of our older, pre-1990 model automobiles.
That ought to make people pretty mad.
Sincerely,
Don Harkins, The Idaho Observer
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow. Join our list.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a board-certified osteopathic medical doctor from Cleveland, Ohio. Dr. Tenpenny is a practicing physician and cares for patients 2.5 days per week. Dr. Tenpenny is an internationally known expert on the problems associated with vaccines. Students from all over the world have become confident parents and articulate activists through her online educational courses, found at Courses4Mastery.com. As the “Voice for the Health Freedom,” Dr. Tenpenny is an outspoken advocate for free choice in healthcare, including the right to refuse vaccination.
Photocredit: 38564883 © Fedecandoniphoto | Dreamstime.com