vaxxter--2020-05-23--Unmasking the Many Truths about the COVID19 Plandemic

In a flurry of conflicting reports about the novel coronavirus , its symptoms , transmission routes , along with the ever-growing list of illnesses that it allegedly causes , we seem to be no closer to understanding the outbreak than when it started .
Three months into the pandemic , we have learned almost nothing .
Okay , we ’ ve learned a few things .
But the real truths are rarely related to the virus or the cures .
To start with , we have learned about the hellbent nature of the Silicon Valley tech giants to censor any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t align with the pharma vaccine agenda .
For example , take Dr. Anthony Fauci ’ s concealment of an approved hydroxychloroquine treatment : It cured coronavirus infections as far back as 2005 .
What about the continual attacks on the vaccine risk aware community ?
The latter made up of scores of professionals , from doctors and scientists to lawyers and researchers .
Not a conspiracy theorist among them .
Yet , that is not how the vaccine monolith in the mainstream press treats them .
They are vilified , called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many of them are no such thing .
They are simply educated and informed individuals persistently seeking – and in some cases demanding – the scientific evidence to prove vaccines are safe .
Two decades later , they ’ re still waiting .
So , why is there an inexorable rush to make the COVID19 vaccines while bypassing the animal testing phase ?
Why isn ’ t safety and quality control paramount in the pursuit of a coronavirus vaccine ?
There are currently at least 119 vaccines in this fast-tracked pipeline , with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ funded by the Gates Foundation .
Will the ( eventual ) chosen candidate ( s ) brought to market cause severe injuries ?
Will they kill you ?
When the Plandemic , the movie , burst onto the scene and went viral ( you can watch it at that link ) , it garnered millions of views .
Its hashtag # PlandemicMovie captured the imagination of millions of people by feeding them a fist-full of little known Red Pills .
Twitter banned and deleted the hashtag , while Big Pharma proxies attacked the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same sword in an attempt to make the awareness campaign disappear .
It failed .
In fact , she publicly refuted her critics on LondonReal with Brian Rose .
Plandemic , which features former NIH virologist Dr. Judy Mikovits , whose new book Plague of Corruption , about the institutional fraud of medicine carried out in one of the United States ’ healthcare agencies , surged to number one on Amazon ’ s bestseller list on May 7 and later in the week , became a New York Time bestseller too .
Talk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pharma counter the double body blow ?
They attacked the messenger with the obligatory character assassination and smeared the movie as conspiratorial .
Right .
And Epstein ’ s suicide ‘ jumped the shark ’ of believability , forever killing the conspiracy theory label .
But that hasn ’ t stopped the COVID19 vaccine train from leaving the station .
Pharma still has many problems to overcome beyond a book and a movie by a former government scientist .
Senator Rand Paul ( R-KY ) at the Senate Hearings on the COVID19 attacked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shut down societies and wrongly lock people in their homes .
Sweden and Belarus are two examples of countries that let healthy people carry on with their lives , while they sheltered the frail and the elderly .
How did this global shut down happen ?
A model contrived by recently resigned professor Niall Ferguson at Imperial College in the U.K. His ‘ assessment ’ and predictive model has been thoroughly debunked as a fraud .
Software engineers found incompetent source code and critiqued his model with blistering reviews .
During the delay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coders from Microsoft to help but all they could produce was a Ford Pinto instead of a Ferrari .
Senator Paul saved the best for last as he took aim at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and World Health Organization ( WHO ) .
He fired at Dr. Anthony Fauci , who is supposed to be running the NIH division of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) .
The verdict is in : The American people are sick of Dr. Anthony Fauci and Niall Ferguson .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fearmongering scientists who got the Nostradamus predictions of doom wrong .
Even the Centers for Disease Control ( CDC ) has walked back its inflated COVID19 deaths model by 40 percent , decreasing the predicted deaths from 67,000 to 37,000 .
What many people are finding out is that the CDC has lumped in other categories of illness under the COVID19 umbrella of death .
The CDC lumped pneumonia and influenza deaths together with the COVID19 deaths .
The Cares Act incentivized hospitals to add coronavirus illness and death to death certificates even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and mortality rate .
The CDC finally corrected its cooked books , as of May 13 , John Hopkins University continues to show the inflated number—now 83,000 deaths in the U.S. instead of using the adjusted CDC number .
Why is this happening ?
It ’ s not about the threat of the virus .
It ’ s being done to ensure that Gates can lead the globalist ’ s agenda to vaccinate everyone on the planet .
Recall that Johns Hopkins was one of the lead partners with the Gates Foundation at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the 201 Simulation , where 65 million people were predicted to die from the coronavirus pandemic .
The CDC played a big role in the disastrous lockdowns in the United States deploying faulty test kits .
The United Kingdom rejected 200,000 test kits from China that were defective and found to be contaminated with the SARS-CoV2 virus .
Had those tests been used , they all would have all registered positive .
But such shady , shoddy tactics merely moved on to the next country .
Recently , Tanzania found similar issues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ African nation .
The prime minister , who is a trained biologist , set a quality-control trap for the foreign health invaders .
He tested a goat , a quail , and a pawpaw fruit , giving them names , genders , and ages .
Once the tests were conducted , the government sent the kits to the designated laboratory .
When all the tests came back positive , Tanzania fired the head of the lab .
Is this how the CDC and the WHO plan to operate and provide “ global health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ —their slogans—in the future ?
Is this how the U.S. and global health agencies misspent billions in taxpayers ’ money , wasted on faulty equipment and broken models while shutting down the world ’ s healthy economies ?
Little of this makes any sense now .
But soon it might with 2020 hindsight and multiple investigations , not just congressional hearings .
Why would the U.S. decimate its workforce , resulting in more than 33 million suddenly unemployed and 20 million more underemployed ?
Who benefited from this catastrophe ?
It certainly was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or global health .
Was the ultimate goal to conceal the Plandemic from the public ?
It ’ s certainly starting to look that way .
The neo-fascist governors in New York , Maryland , Illinois , New Jersey , Connecticut , Michigan , Wisconsin , Hawaii , California , and Washington who locked down their economies to “ flatten the curve , ” turned out to a flagrant lie , a bait-and-switch deception .
While the governors and their staffs continued to get paid as their constituents suffered doesn ’ t make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to vaccinate everyone .
That would empower Big Pharma to continue to promote the “ vaccines safe and effective ” mantra .
They may not be able to mandatorily force people to be vaccinated , but they could make life so miserable it would be difficult to resist .
What if being vaccinated with this experimental vaccine was required to renew your driver ’ s license ?
your passport ?
go to work ?
go to a sports event ?
get groceries ?
get your hair cut ?
go to a restaurant ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ insurance ?
This vaccine , being developed under the liability-free protection of the 2005 PREP Act , could include nanotechnology , stray viruses and chemicals that are known carcinogens .
Would we ever know what is really coming through that needle ?
And even if we did know , we would have zero recourse if the vaccine harmed – or killed us .
To pull off this ugly and grandiose plan they didn ’ t need to create a global panic and outbreak .
Their dark goals are waking up the masses .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ % of Americans will refuse to take a COVID19 vaccine .
If that same survey were carried a year ago , it likely would have registered less than 10 % who would have objected .
Now that humankind has been locked down over a bogus virus backed by sham science , people are paying attention .
The number of people won ’ t be taking a coronavirus vaccine will only grow as the year marches on and more dark truths are revealed .
The more this humanmade fraud is exposed , the more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without looking back .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist , covering subjects from autism , its cause and treatments , clean technology , green energy , and the BP Oil Spill , to business and Wall Street , and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics since 2005 .
He is the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area .
He is the author of Master Manipulator : The Explosive True Story of Fraud , Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC .

By James Grundvig, Investigative Reporter, Vaxxter contributor
In a flurry of conflicting reports about the novel coronavirus, its symptoms, transmission routes, along with the ever-growing list of illnesses that it allegedly causes, we seem to be no closer to understanding the outbreak than when it started.
Three months into the pandemic, we have learned almost nothing. Okay, we’ve learned a few things. But the real truths are rarely related to the virus or the cures. To start with, we have learned about the hellbent nature of the Silicon Valley tech giants to censor any dissenting view when the opposing narratives don’t align with the pharma vaccine agenda. For example, take Dr. Anthony Fauci’s concealment of an approved hydroxychloroquine treatment: It cured coronavirus infections as far back as 2005.
What about the continual attacks on the vaccine risk-aware community? The latter made up of scores of professionals, from doctors and scientists to lawyers and researchers. Not a conspiracy theorist among them. Yet, that is not how the vaccine monolith in the mainstream press treats them. They are vilified, called out as “anti-vax” heretics when many of them are no such thing. They are simply educated and informed individuals persistently seeking – and in some cases demanding – the scientific evidence to prove vaccines are safe. Two decades later, they’re still waiting.
So, why is there an inexorable rush to make COVID19 vaccines while bypassing the animal testing phase? Why isn’t safety and quality control paramount in the pursuit of a coronavirus vaccine? There are currently at least 119 vaccines in this fast-tracked pipeline, with at least nine of them being directly funded by the Gates Foundation. Will the (eventual) chosen candidate(s) brought to market cause severe injuries? Will they kill you?
Censorship and Bad Models
When Plandemic, the movie, burst onto the scene and went viral, it garnered millions of views. Its hashtag #PlandemicMovie captured the imagination of millions of people by feeding them a fist-full of little known Red Pills. Twitter banned and deleted the hashtag, while Big Pharma proxies attacked the truth problem from both edges of the same sword in an attempt to make the awareness campaign disappear. It failed. In fact, she publicly refuted her critics on LondonReal with Brian Rose.
Plandemic, which features former NIH virologist Dr. Judy Mikovits, whose new book Plague of Corruption, about the institutional fraud of medicine carried out in one of the United States’ healthcare agencies, surged to number one on Amazon’s bestseller list on May 7 and later in the week, became a New York Times bestseller too. Talk about a one-two punch.
How did pharma counter the double body blow?
Ad Hominem Attack
They attacked the messenger with the obligatory character assassination and smeared the movie as conspiratorial. Right. And Epstein’s suicide “jumped the shark” of believability, forever killing the conspiracy theory label. But that hasn’t stopped the COVID19 vaccine train from leaving the station. Pharma still has many problems to overcome beyond a book and a movie by a former government scientist.
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) at the Senate Hearings on the COVID19 attacked the model that persuaded the world to shut down societies and wrongly lock people in their homes. Sweden and Belarus are two examples of countries that let healthy people carry on with their lives, while they sheltered the frail and the elderly. How did this global shut down happen? A model contrived by recently resigned professor Neil Ferguson at Imperial College in the U.K. His “assessment” and predictive model has been thoroughly debunked as a fraud. Software engineers found incompetent source code and critiqued his model with blistering reviews. During the delay, Ferguson brought it a team of coders from Microsoft to help, but all they could produce was a Ford Pinto instead of a Ferrari.
Senator Paul Torpedoes Dr. Fauci
Senator Paul saved the best for last as he took aim at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and World Health Organization (WHO). He fired at Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is supposed to be running the NIH division of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
“And as much as I respect you, Dr. Fauci, I don’t think you’re the end-all,” Paul said. “I don’t think you’re the one person who gets to make the final decision. We can listen to your advice, but there are people on the other side saying there’s not going to be a surge, that we can safely open the economy. And the facts will bear this out.”
The verdict is in: The American people are sick of Dr. Anthony Fauci and Neil Ferguson. They see these two as nothing more than fearmongering scientists who got the Nostradamus predictions of doom wrong.
CDC Corruption from Agent Orange to COVID19
Even the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has walked back its inflated COVID19 deaths model by 40 percent, decreasing the predicted deaths from 67,000 to 37,000. What many people are finding out is that the CDC has lumped in other categories of illness under the COVID19 umbrella of deaths. The CDC lumped pneumonia and influenza deaths together with the COVID19 deaths. The Cares Act incentivized hospitals to add coronavirus illness and death to death certificates even without testing, inflating the actual cases and mortality rate.
The CDC finally corrected its cooked books. But as of May 13, John Hopkins University continues to show the inflated number of 83,000 deaths in the U.S. instead of using the adjusted CDC number.
Why is this happening? It’s not about the threat of the virus. It’s being done to ensure that Gates can lead the globalist’s agenda to vaccinate everyone on the planet. Recall that Johns Hopkins was one of the lead partners with the Gates Foundation at the World Economic Forum’s Event, the 201 Simulation, where 65 million people were predicted to die from the coronavirus pandemic.
Fits with Testing Kits
The CDC played a big role in the disastrous lockdowns causing the United States to deploy faulty test kits. The United Kingdom rejected 200,000 test kits from China that were defective and found to be contaminated with the SARS-CoV2 virus. Had those tests been used, they all would’ve registered positive. But such shady, shoddy tactics merely moved on to the next country.
Recently, Tanzania found similar issues with the test kits given to the African nation. The prime minister, who is a trained biologist, set a quality-control trap for the foreign health invaders. He tested a goat, a quail, and a pawpaw fruit, giving them names, genders, and ages. Once the tests were conducted, the government sent the kits to the designated laboratory. When all the tests came back positive, Tanzania fired the head of the lab.
Is this how the CDC and the WHO plan to operate and provide “global health security” and “pandemic preparedness” — their slogans — in the future? Is this how U.S. and global health agencies misspent billions in taxpayers’ money, wasted on faulty equipment and broken models while shutting down global healthy economies?
Little of this makes any sense now. But soon it might with 20/20 hindsight and multiple investigations — not just congressional hearings. Why would the U.S. decimate its workforce, resulting in more than 33 million suddenly unemployed and 20 million more underemployed? Who benefited from this catastrophe? It certainly wasn’t in the best interest of biosecurity or global health.
Lies, fraud, taxpayer theft, censorship, fake models, cooked data, shoddy science, preloaded positive tests, and compromised and incompetent scientists and politicians, and so much more prop up the pandemic disaster.
Was the ultimate goal to conceal the Plandemic from the public? It’s certainly starting to look that way.
States on Lockdown
The neo-fascist governors in New York, Maryland, Illinois, New Jersey, Connecticut, Michigan, Wisconsin, Hawaii, California, and Washington, who locked down their economies to “flatten the curve,” turned out to flagrantly lie their a bait-and-switch deception. Remember, the governors and their staffs continue to get paid while their constituents suffer. It doesn’t make sense, unless…
The real goal is to vaccinate everyone.
That would empower Big Pharma to continue promoting the “vaccines safe and effective” mantra. They may not be able to mandatorily force people to be vaccinated, but they could make life so miserable it would be difficult to resist. What if being vaccinated with this experimental vaccine was required to renew your driver’s license? your passport? go to work? go to a sports event? get groceries? get your hair cut? go to a restaurant? see your doctor and use your health insurance?
This vaccine, being developed under the liability-free protection of the 2005 PREP Act, could include nanotechnology, stray viruses, and chemicals that are known carcinogens. Would we ever know what is really coming through that needle? And even if we did know, we would have zero recourse if the vaccine harmed or killed us. To pull off this ugly and grandiose plan they didn’t need to create a global panic and outbreak.
We are Waking Up
Their dark goals are waking up the masses. A recent survey found that nearly 50% of Americans will refuse to take a COVID19 vaccine. If that same survey were carried a year ago, it likely would have registered less than 10% who would have objected.
Now that humankind has been locked down over a bogus virus backed by sham science, people are paying attention. The number of people won’t be taking a coronavirus vaccine will only grow as the year marches on and more dark truths are revealed.
The more this humanmade fraud is exposed, the more people will leap off the vaccine bandwagon without looking back.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist, covering subjects from autism, its cause and treatments, clean technology, green energy, and the BP Oil Spill, to business and Wall Street, and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics since 2005. He is the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain logistics in the Construction IT space. James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area. He is the author of Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC.
Photocredit: ID 183694460 © khairulannuar mat | Dreamstime.com


vaxxter--2020-05-28--Vaccine Truth vs Alan Dershowitz:  Law and Science Is On Our Side, Part 2

More about Jacobson and the Law As a former professor of constitutional law , I have read nearly all the case law on vaccination policies and practices in the United States .
As a person who has analyzed the history and science of vaccines from the 18th century to the present , I insist that Dershowitz ( 2020 ) , Matthews ( 2020 ) , and all the other vaccine zealots are completely wrong .
As noted above from Jacobson , there is no legal opinion that supports the idea that the government can compel injections , and certainly , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Constitution addresses the idea .
Before I explain in more detail about the holding of Jacobson , let me recount the tangible result of the case : Mr. Henning Jacobson was neither vaccinated , nor jailed .
After his final appeal was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court , there was no outbreak at the time and it had been three years since health officials in Boston had declared a smallpox epidemic in 1902 , Jacobson paid a one-time fine of $ 5 .
This was a sizable sum for the day ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ average weekly income of a working-class laborer .
See Willrich ( 2011 ) , chapter 8 .
Let that sink in : During an era of a supposedly highly contagious rate by a deadly disease , despite an order from the local health board for mandatory vaccination , people could just pay a fine and go about their business .
No lockdown , no quarantine .
Even though the ruling against him , the U.S. Supreme Court did not rule that Jacobson could be forced to receive the shot .
Nor did the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , indefinitely .
I have edited and parsed the exact text of the holding in Jacobson as follows : as to an adult , residing in the community , and a fit subject of vaccination , the statute [ does not violate ] the Fourteenth Amendment.
” Jacobson at 12 .
Near the end of his opinion , Harlan added a significant caveat .
He explained that : ( A ) vaccination laws are never to be applied to all people regardless of circumstance ; and ( B ) Courts may issue injunctions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be caused by a vaccine .
As demonstrated by his declarations , Prof. Dershowitz is either woefully ignorant of the full opinion or can not comprehend the breadth of the following : “ It is easy , for instance , to suppose the case of an adult [ for whom ] vaccination in a particular condition of his health or body , would be cruel and inhuman…We are not to be understood as holding that the statute was intended to be applied to such a case , or … that the judiciary [ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health and life of the individual concerned.
” ( Jacobson at 38-39 ) .
I think that we can best paraphrase the rule from Jacobson like this : ‘ A local jurisdiction may impose a fine upon any fit adult , who refuses a free vaccine , administered by the government , when there is an epidemic , unless , the person can show , by a preponderance of the evidence , that they are likely to be harmed by the shot.
’ Jacobson had been vaccinated .
But so what ?
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his son had been vaccinated prior to March 1897 .
I will repeat that .
The Jacobson case was not about an anti-vaxxer who refused … because of … uh , reasons .
Rather , as applied to Jacobson and his son the criminal law demanded that these two , who had previously been injected and suffered vaccine injuries , get re-vaccinated .
( And there was no Vaccine Court .
As stated by his lawyers : “ If injured , the person vaccinated is damaged without compensation.
” ( Jacobson , 197 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was applied arbitrarily .
Jacobson was not allowed to offer a defense ( Jacobson , 197 U.S. at 17 ) .
The Board of Health was not required to show any evidence that these men were at risk of contracting smallpox or were contagious or could harm others .
Here is what Jacobson faced : “ [ the ] requirement of the board of health of Cambridge , made on February 27 , 1902 , [ ordered ] that all the inhabitants of the city , who had not been successfully [ sic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , be vaccinated or revaccinated.
” ( Jacobson at 12-13 . )
I want to focus in on two concepts here .
Note that the local order called for revaccination ; and invoked the idea of successful vaccination .
“ It must be admitted that smallpox has occurred after the most perfect vaccination .
The number of cases [ however ] is not greater than that of smallpox after smallpox.
” Edward Jenner 1811 , in Baron ( 1838 : 245 ) .
We know that in 1902 , given the scientific knowledge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Cambridge board of health that established the five-year window for exemption from re-vaccination was arbitrary .
• No one even knew what caused smallpox .
• No one had seen or defined the concept of antibodies .
• There were no electron microscopes .
• No one had any means to determine if previously vaccinated persons were immune to future exposure to smallpox .
Jenner saw with his own eyes that even a natural smallpox infection was no guarantee of immunity from future smallpox illness .
Speaking about a patient of his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mr. Gwinnett , had the small-pox five times ” ( Baron 1838 : 265 ) .
Beyond this , there was no quality control on the production of smallpox vaccines .
There were no health department officials who could point to the efficacy of vaccination .
On the contrary , large data sets showed that mass vaccination was neither associated with lower death rates nor significant drops in rates of smallpox infection .
See White ( 1885 ) , The Story of a Great Delusion .
By the start of the 20th century @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
As detailed by the lawyers for Jacobson , as of 1905 , 34 of the 45 U.S. states had no compulsory vaccination laws .
Some states , such as Wisconsin , had specifically repealed vaccine requirements .
Jacobson at 15 , 16 .
Countries of England , Holland , Switzerland , and others had abolished mandatory vaccination laws .
Jacobson at 16 .
And what was a virus circa 1902 ?
Back then , the word virus was a collective noun the defined the result of a disease ( e.g.
, pus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a person had pustules , they were said to be filled with virus which was considered to be a good thing .
The logic of the time held that if a person had expelled virus , the disease had run its course and the infected person was no longer contagious .
( See Jenner 1798 , paragraph 73 ; and Jenner 1799 , paragraphs 26 , 49 , 50 , 95 ) .
Without any concept of antibodies , what did a Board of Health in 1902 , call a successful vaccination ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ fever , malaise , and blisters filled with pus .
Sometimes , despite this “ success ” the child ( or adult ) could die within a few days of the vaccination .
Sometimes they died within a few months due to tuberculosis , then called phthisis , scrofula , or consumption .
See Life of Jenner volume II , page 252 .
About 1 % of the time , the successfully vaccinated person would later fall ill with smallpox or even cowpox .
See Jenner ( 1798 ) , paragraph 26 ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In a letter of 1804 , Jenner expressed his idea about successful vaccination and whether it could confer immunity : “ I have said fifty times before , ‘ If the vaccine pustule goes through its stages correctly , the patient is secure from smallpox ; if not , security can not be [ assured ] .
’ … ‘ When a deviation arises in the character of the vaccine pustule … common prudence [ calls for ] re-inoculation.
’ ” ( Baron 1838 : 343 ) .
Hey Harvard Law faculty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ignorance of the law ?
Putting together what was known at the time about vaccine-science and vaccination practices in the Jacobson-era , an order from any local the Board of Health could demand that a person get injected and fall ill .
If the pustules were not to the liking of some doctor , the person could be subjected to the process again and again .
The mass vaccinations could even spread more illness – but according to Dershowitz – none of that would be legal cause to prevent tragedy .
The scientific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now well-documented .
And unlike the rules of 1900 , present-day American jurisprudence allows a legal defense whereby one could offer testimony or expert opinion to show how a vaccine – especially an experimental vaccine – is unsafe , or not proven to confer health benefits .
No American court has ever ruled that we can be vaccinated against our will .
Plenty of cases have upheld the “ no vaccination , no school ” rule , but those cases never include orders to arrest parents or inject their kids by force .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the foreseeable future , the Pharma shills ( aka American media ) will tell us that we must be vaccinated with the COVID19 vaccine , and everyone – doctors , politicians , patients – will ignore the fact that there is a long-standing legal precedent that we can not be ordered to get the shot against our will .
Stay aware – tell your friends and family to resist .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ John C. Jones received his law degree ( 2001 ) and his Ph.D. is in political science ( 2003 ) from the University of Iowa .
He has over 15 years of research and writing ( both academic and journalistic ) in fields of public policy and law , criminal and Constitutional law , and philosophy of science and medicine .
His additional areas of expertise and specialized knowledge include applied statistics , etymology , political communications/public relations , litigation and court procedure .
He has a particular interest in the science and @ @ @ @

By John Jones, JD, PhD, Vaxxter contributor (Part 1 here)
Mandatory Vaccination: More about Jacobson and the Law
As a former professor of constitutional law, I’ve read nearly all the case law on vaccination policies and practices in the United States. And also, as a person who has analyzed the history and science of vaccines from the 18th century to the present, I insist that Dershowitz (2020), Matthews (2020), and all the other vaccine zealots are completely wrong. As noted above from Jacobson, there is no legal opinion that supports the idea that the government can compel injections, and certainly, nothing in the text of the U.S. Constitution addresses the idea.
Before I explain in more detail about the holding of Jacobson, let me recount the tangible result of the case:
Mr. Henning Jacobson never received vaccination or jail time.
After his final appeal rejection by the U.S. Supreme Court, there was no outbreak at the time and it had been three years since health officials in Boston had declared a smallpox epidemic in 1902, Jacobson paid a one-time fine of $5. This was a sizable sum for the day; it was roughly 50% of the average weekly income of a working-class laborer. See Willrich (2011), chapter 8.
Let that sink in: During an era of a supposedly highly contagious rate by a deadly disease, despite an order from the local health board for mandatory vaccination, people could just pay a fine and go about their business. No lockdown, no quarantine.
There is No Forcing
Even though the ruling was against him, the U.S. Supreme Court did not rule that Jacobson had no other option but to receive the shot. Nor did the court rule that Jacobson could indefinitely become a detainee.
I have edited and parsed the exact text of the holding in Jacobson as follows:
The highest court of Massachusetts, not having held that the compulsory vaccination law … establishes the absolute rule, that an adult must be vaccinated, even if: (i) he is [unfit] at the time; or (ii) [the] vaccination would seriously injure his health or cause his death, this court holds that:
as to an adult, residing in the community, and a fit subject of vaccination, the statute [does not violate] the Fourteenth Amendment. Jacobson at 12.
Laws Aren’t For All
Near the end of his opinion, Harlan added a significant caveat. He explains: (A) vaccination laws aren’t for universal application to all people regardless of circumstance; and (B) Courts may issue injunctions to prevent harm or injury that could be caused by a vaccine. As demonstrated by his declarations, Prof. Dershowitz is either woefully ignorant of the full opinion or cannot comprehend the breadth of the following:
It is easy, for instance, to suppose the case of an adult [for whom] vaccination in a particular condition of his health or body, would be cruel and inhuman … We are not to be understood as holding that the statute was intended to be applied to such a case, or … that the judiciary [could not] interfere and protect the health and life of the individual concerned. (Jacobson at 38-39).
I think that we can best paraphrase the rule from Jacobson like this:
A local jurisdiction may impose a fine upon any fit adult, who refuses a free vaccine, administered by the government, when there is an epidemic, unless, the person can show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that they are likely to be harmed by the shot.
Jacobson Had Been Vaccinated. But So What?
As a factual matter, both Jacobson and his son had been vaccinated prior to March 1897. I will repeat that. The Jacobson case was not about an anti-vaxxer who refused … because of … uh, reasons. Rather, as applied to Jacobson and his son, the criminal law demanded that these two, who had previously been injected and suffered vaccine injuries, get re-vaccinated. (And there was no Vaccine Court. As stated by his lawyers: “If injured, the person vaccinated is damaged without compensation.” (Jacobson, 197 U.S. at 17).
The application of this law was arbitrary. Jacobson was not allowed to offer a defense (Jacobson, 197 U.S. at 17). The Board of Health had no requirement to show any evidence that these men were at risk of contracting smallpox or were contagious or could harm others. Here is what Jacobson faced:
[The] requirement of the board of health of Cambridge, made on February 27, 1902, [ordered] that all the inhabitants of the city, who had not been successfully [sic] vaccinated since March 1, 1897, be vaccinated or revaccinated. (Jacobson at 12-13.)
I want to focus in on two concepts here. Note that the local order called for revaccination; and invoked the idea of successful vaccination.
It must be admitted that smallpox has occurred after the most perfect vaccination. The number of cases [however] is not greater than that of smallpox after smallpox. Edward Jenner 1811, in Baron (1838: 245).
Revaccination Served No Purpose
We know that in 1902, given the scientific knowledge at the time, the order from the Cambridge board of health that established the five-year window for exemption from re-vaccination was arbitrary.
No one even knew what caused smallpox.
No one had seen or defined the concept of antibodies.
There were no electron microscopes.
No one had any means to determine if previously vaccinated persons were immune to future exposure to smallpox.
Jenner saw with his own eyes that even a natural smallpox infection was no guarantee of immunity from future smallpox illness. Speaking about a patient of his, Jenner said, “Lady of Mr. Gwinnett, had the small-pox five times” (Baron 1838: 265).
Beyond this, there was no quality control on the production of smallpox vaccines. There were no health department officials who could point to the efficacy of vaccination. On the contrary, large data sets show that mass vaccination had no association with lower death rates or significant drops in rates of smallpox infection. See White (1885), The Story of a Great Delusion.
Smallpox Vaccination Had Huge Opposition
By the start of the 20th century, mass smallpox vaccination was has a large opposition. As detailed by the lawyers for Jacobson, as of 1905, 34 of the 45 U.S. states had no compulsory vaccination laws. Some states, such as Wisconsin, had specifically repealed vaccine requirements. Jacobson at 15, 16. Countries of England, Holland, Switzerland, and others had abolished mandatory vaccination laws. Jacobson at 16.
And what was a virus circa 1902? Back then, the word virus was a collective noun the defined the result of a disease (e.g., pus), not its cause. If pustules were present in the body, the body was full with virus which was a good thing at the time. The logic of the time held that if a person had expelled virus, the disease had run its course and the infected person was no longer contagious. (See Jenner 1798, paragraph 73; and Jenner 1799, paragraphs 26, 49, 50, 95).
Without any concept of antibodies, what did a Board of Health in 1902 call a successful vaccination?
Edward Jenner defined successful vaccination as: fever, malaise, and blisters filled with pus. Sometimes, despite this “success” the child (or adult) could die within a few days of the vaccination. Sometimes they died within a few months due to tuberculosis, then called phthisis, scrofula, or consumption. See Life of Jenner volume II, page 252. About one percent of the time, the successfully vaccinated person would later fall ill with smallpox or even cowpox. See Jenner (1798), paragraph 26; and Baron (1838: 245).
In a letter of 1804, Jenner expressed his idea about successful vaccination and whether it could confer immunity:
I have said fifty times before, ‘If the vaccine pustule goes through its stages correctly, the patient is secure from smallpox; if not, security cannot be [assured].’ … ‘When a deviation arises in the character of the vaccine pustule … common prudence [calls for] re-inoculation.’ (Baron 1838: 343).
Hey Harvard Law faculty, Will You Rebuke Dershowitz for His Ignorance of the Law?
Putting together the information at the time about vaccine-science and vaccination practices in the Jacobson-era, an order from any local Board of Health could demand that a person receive an injection and fall ill. If the pustules were not to the liking of some doctor, the person could receive the process again and again. The mass vaccinations could even spread more illness. But according to Dershowitz, none of that would be legal cause to prevent tragedy.
The scientific evidence of the harm of vaccines is now well-documented. And unlike the rules of 1900, present-day American jurisprudence allows a legal defense whereby one could offer testimony or expert opinion to show how a vaccine – especially an experimental vaccine – is unsafe, or not proven to confer health benefits.
(And didn’t Harlan imply that one could offer a defense? Why has that part of the opinion been ignored by today’s legal scholars?)
No American court has ever given a ruling that vaccination against your will is possible. Plenty of cases have upheld the “no vaccination, no school” rule, but those cases never include orders to arrest parents or inject their kids by force.
Nonetheless, it is quite possible that in the foreseeable future, the Pharma shills (aka American media) will tell us that we must receive the COVID19 vaccine, and everyone – doctors, politicians, patients – will ignore the fact that there is a long-standing legal precedent that we cannot be ordered to get the shot against our will.
Stay aware – tell your friends and family to resist.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
John C. Jones received his law degree (2001) and his Ph.D. is in political science (2003) from the University of Iowa. He has over 15 years of research and writing (both academic and journalistic) in fields of public policy and law, criminal and Constitutional law, and philosophy of science and medicine. His additional areas of expertise and specialized knowledge include applied statistics, etymology, political communications/public relations, litigation and court procedure. He has a particular interest in the science and history of vaccines.


vaxxter--2020-05-28--Vaccine Truth vs Alan Dershowitz:  Law and Science Is On Our Side, Part 1

In a mid-May 2020 interview , the famous Harvard Law professor , once known as a defender of individual freedom , Alan Dershowitz , said the following : To be fair , later in the interview , Dershowitz articulated what justice would look like under a mandatory vaccination regime .
He opined , “ They should give you an alternative , live in your home … but never , ever , leave your home … ” Dershowitz declared that the state of American law on bodily integrity , is founded in Supreme Court precedent , namely Jacobson v. Massachusetts , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But he also claimed , without any specific citations , that there are There is just one small problem with his analysis .
Dershowitz is completely wrong .
We should have expected this .
With the COVID19 Plandemic , as Del Bigtree and others ( 2020 ) have shown , we have been bombarded for months with talk about the coming vaccine .
But this mantra is not new .
For years , Dr. Sherri Tenpenny has warned us about the plan to institute mandatory vaccine laws – not just for children , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defined in the CDC ’ s Healthy People 2020 .
Launched in 2010 , Healthy People 2020 ( HP2020 ) has laudable and unassailable goals including : • Improve the health of all [ social ] groups So what is the catch ?
It is the mechanism of how this is achieved : Increased immunization rates .
Of course , the blueprints offered in HP2020 only push so-called immunizations – shots of a liquid filled with formaldehyde , cells from monkey kidneys and aborted humans , traces of glyphosate , large amount of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It is all announced in the name of reducing so-called vaccine-preventable [ sic ] , infectious diseases .
There is only one small problem , the data refutes the scientism of vaccinology .
For example , objective IID-12 reads : “ Increase the percentage of children and adults who are vaccinated annually against seasonal influenza.
” But the effect of increasing flu shots results in higher levels of production of so-called viruses .
And other than when flu shots are not killing the elderly , or causing paralysis , they provide no benefit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dogma about the need to reduce rates of hepatitis ( in infants and toddlers ) and reducing rates of mumps , and measles , and meningitis , and pneumonia – and the need to continue a program to administer multiple doses … constant re-vaccination .
We know that some of these ailments are common in teens and college-age students who are getting re-vaccinated .
And we know most of these infections are not contagious due to casual contact , but from transfers of bodily fluids – so most of us are not at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ step back and consider the assumptions in modern vaccinology – those which Dershowitz holds and is ready to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court .
Are all infections diseases ?
Are viruses exogenous contagions or are they endogenous exosomes that are essential for life ?
( Andrew Kaufman , MD has an answer ) .
Here is question for the authors of HP2020 , “ How much injected aluminum does it take to lead to Alzheimer ’ s , Parkinson ’ s , dementia , and autism ?
” ( Prof. Christopher Exley @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the CDC , HHS , and big pharma have failed to discover ) .
Despite the lack of double-blind , true placebo trials with vaccines , despite the fact that all vaccines are experiments … Dershowitz is sure that the law of the U.S. holds that anyone and everyone can be imprisoned for life if they refuse to submit to a vaccine .
And he is secure in his convictions as derived from a logic of a vaccine-science , articulated by a single man ( Justice Harlan ) in 1905 .
Professor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ belief or policy preference .
Even the editors at World Net Daily want you to resign yourself – like cattle marching through the slaughter-house – to the notion that one day , you and your children will be poisoned in the name of freedom , science , and goodness .
A quick search online finds three prominent articles , all citing Jacobson , all insisting that the only conclusion we can see is that the U.S. Constitution holds that the State ( just group of men and women – often coercing us through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you to be injected .
• – a medical doctor , and then law student , Sarah Fujiwara , writing in the AMA Journal of Ethics [ sic ] , described a hypothetical circumstance where SARS cases are found in Canada , centered on a college student ( Joseph ) , who has not been exposed .
Dr. Fujiwara asks , ‘ if the State of Illinois mandates a new experimental SARS vaccine , can Joseph refuse ?
’ Referencing case law and invoking abstract notions about her hypothetical unexposed Joseph somehow being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Fujiwara concludes : • “ Real liberty for all can not exist if each individual is allowed to act without regard to the injury that his or her actions might cause others ; liberty is constrained by law ” ; • “ It is immaterial whether … the vaccine is actually effective , so long as it is the belief of state authorities that the mandatory vaccine will promote common welfare … ( drawing on the language of Jacobson • “ The only exception to a mandatory vaccination is an offer of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the state board of health [ sic ] , that the vaccination would seriously impair health or probably cause death ” ( she offers Jacobson at 38 , but there is no language in the opinion that describes exceptions or appeals to the Board of Health ) ; • Consequently , our student , Joseph , does not have a valid argument against the mandatory vaccination .
It is most apparent , from her brief review of Jacobson , that Dr. Fujiwara never read the case , does not know the pertinent facts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the evolution of legal doctrines related to Constitutional law and due process since 1905 .
• – A lawyer for the Congressional Research Service , Wen Shen , presented a memo titled : An Overview of State and Federal Authority to Impose Vaccination Requirements .
Citing Jacobson , Shen finds that States have absolute power to require any and all vaccines .
Shen ( 2019 ) claims that : • “ In 1905 , the Supreme Court in Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts upheld a state law that gave municipal boards of health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccination , of persons over the age of 21 , against smallpox.
” Shen ( 2019 ) mischaracterizes the legal issues in the case .
Henning Jacobson brought a due process challenge to a criminal law – a law that granted him no opportunity to raise a defense .
Jacobson , 197 U.S. at 17 .
The case did not center on a forced injection – there was no force and there would be no injections .
The challenge centered on the propriety and legality of imposing criminal penalties for those who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ form of Russian Roulette .
In regards to the ruling of both the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts and the U.S. Supreme Court , each upheld as valid a criminal law which had express exemptions for unfit children , but none for unfit adults .
Jacobson , 197 U.S. at 17 .
Children were exempted from the fine by showing a doctor ’ s note that documented that they were unfit candidates for vaccination .
Parents of exempted children were not liable for fines .
[ See R. L. c. 75 , § @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for adults like Jacobson , the public health rule read like this : Get a shot , LEST you receive a $ 5 fine or remain imprisoned until the fine is paid .
See Jacobson at 14 .
Please note , writing the opinion for the U.S. Supreme Court , Justice Harlan claimed that the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts ruled that if Jacobson refused to pay a fine or refused to be vaccinated , that he could be imprisoned indefinitely .
However , no statutory reference is cited to support the notion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at that time , judges were permitted to issue incarceration orders against defendants who refused to pay fines .
See , for example , Chapter 215 from the Public Statutes of Massachusetts of 1881 .
All this aside , at a time when no laws could mandate quarantine of a healthy person , the particular text of the opinion from the Massachusetts high court omits any discussion of imprisonment ( or even quarantine or home detention ) .
See Commonwealth vs. Pear 183 Mass .
242 ( 1903 ) .
In siding against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the penalties , Massachusetts Chief Justice Knowlton concluded : “ If a person should deem it important that vaccination should not be performed in his case , and the authorities should think otherwise , it is not in their power to vaccinate him by force , and the worst that could happen to him under the statute would be the payment of the penalty of $ 5.
” Commonwealth vs. Pear , 83 Mass .
242 at 248 ( 1903 ) .
When the Supreme Judicial Court held that Jacobson could only be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ upheld that ruling , why would Wen Shen announce that the courts have held that vaccination can be forced ?
Because the current talk about mass vaccination is really a discussion about the drive for a national program with a federal mandate , Shen ( 2019 ) offers some discussion about federal versus state authority .
Under the U.S. Constitution , matters of public health ( general police power ) are limited to state jurisdiction .
At present , without an Amendment , neither Congress nor the President can impose a mandatory vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any federal law would be limited by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ( RFRA ) .
“ Under RFRA , the federal government is prohibited from substantially burdening a person ’ s sincere exercise of religion , unless the government demonstrates [ that ] the application of the burden to the person represents the least restrictive means of advancing a compelling government interest.
” But we know that the least restrictive means for anything is never to inject a person with an experimental and harmful substance called a vaccine .
Furthermore , under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are neither carriers nor contagious pose no risk of harm to others – hence even confinement would not be justified .
• – This article is from The Hill .
Writer Merrill Matthews addresses the specter of a Covid-19 vaccine and laws that would compel us to receive a shot .
Throughout his puff-piece , which ignores the data and serves as little more than native advertising for various pharmaceutical companies , Matthews advocates for flu shots , and promotes the false concept of vaccine-induced herd immunity .
Matthews first assures us that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He writes , “ When a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available , I will be one of the first in line.
” Then he opines on the legal question : In a twisted and misreading of Shen ( 2019 ) , Matthews ( 2020 ) insists that Congress … has some authority over public health matters , including regulation of vaccination .
Of course , Congress can regulate vaccines – see the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act .
And Congress mandates injections for military personnel .
But the Constitution grants Congress no power to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and compel the population to submit to forced injections .
In Part 2 of this article , we will drill down into the Jacobson and what the law really said .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888 John C. Jones received his law degree ( 2001 ) and his Ph.D. is in political science ( 2003 ) from the University of Iowa .
He has over 15 years of research @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) in fields of public policy and law , criminal and Constitutional law , and philosophy of science and medicine .
His additional areas of expertise and specialized knowledge include applied statistics , etymology , political communications/public relations , litigation and court procedure .
He has a particular interest in the science and history of vaccines .

By John Jones, JD, PhD, Vaxxter contributor
A Constitutional Lawyer Said What?
In a mid-May 2020 interview, the famous Harvard Law professor, once known as a defender of individual freedom, Alan Dershowitz, said the following:
“If you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally [sic] take you to a doctor’s office, and plunge a needle into your arm.”
To be fair, later in the interview, Dershowitz articulates what justice would look like under a mandatory vaccination regime. He opined, “They should give you an alternative, live in your home … but never, ever, leave your home …”
Thanks, Alan.
Dershowitz declares that the state of American law on bodily integrity rest on Supreme Court precedent, namely Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905). But he also claimed, without any specific citations, that there are
“In cases, after cases, after cases, that the public health permits reasonable actions to prevent the spread of communicable diseases.”
There is just one small problem with his analysis. Dershowitz is completely wrong.
Background and Context
We should have expected this. With the COVID19 Plandemic, as Del Bigtree and others (2020) have shown, we have been bombarded for months with talk about the coming vaccine. But this mantra is not new. For years, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny warned us about the plan to institute mandatory vaccine laws – not just for children, but for adults. The program is defined in the CDC’s Healthy People 2020.
Vaccine Truth: Healthy People are Injected People?
Launched in 2010, Healthy People 2020 (HP2020) has laudable and unassailable goals including:
Attain high-quality, longer lives free of preventable disease Improve the health of all [social] groups Promote quality of life
So what is the catch? It is the mechanism of how this is achieved: Increased immunization rates.
Of course, the blueprints offered in HP2020 only push so-called immunizations – shots of a liquid filled with formaldehyde, cells from monkey kidneys and aborted humans, traces of glyphosate, large amounts of aluminum, etc to help us. It is all announced in the name of reducing so-called vaccine-preventable [sic], infectious diseases. There is only one small problem, the data refutes the scientism of vaccinology.
For example, objective IID-12 reads: “Increase the percentage of children and adults who are vaccinated annually against seasonal influenza.” But the effect of increasing flu shots results in higher levels of production of so-called viruses. And other than when flu shots are not killing the elderly, or causing paralysis, they provide no benefit.
The other listed objectives are standard dogma about the need to reduce rates of hepatitis (in infants and toddlers) and reducing rates of mumps, and measles, and meningitis, and pneumonia – and the need to continue a program to administer multiple doses … constant re-vaccination.
We know that some of these ailments are common in teens and college-age students who are getting re-vaccinated. And we know most of these infections are not contagious due to casual contact, but from transfers of bodily fluids – so most of us are not at risk.
Vaccinology when Embedded in Law
So let us take a step back and consider the assumptions in modern vaccinology – those which Dershowitz holds and is ready to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Are all infections diseases? Are viruses exogenous contagions or are they endogenous exosomes that are essential for life? (Andrew Kaufman, MD has an answer).
Here is question for the authors of HP2020: How much injected aluminum does it take to lead to Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, dementia, and autism? (Prof. Christopher Exley (2018) might have an answer that the CDC, HHS, and big pharma have failed to discover).
Despite the lack of double-blind, true placebo trials with vaccines, despite the fact that all vaccines are experiments … Dershowitz is sure that the law of the U.S. holds that anyone and everyone can face imprisonment for life if they refuse to submit to a vaccine. And he is secure in his convictions as derived from a logic of a vaccine-science, articulated by a single man (Justice Harlan) in 1905.
Mainstream Legal Opinion and Misreading Jacobson
Professor Dershowitz is not alone in his mistaken belief or policy preference. Even the editors at World Net Daily want you to resign yourself – like cattle marching through the slaughter-house – to the notion that one day, you and your children will be poisoned in the name of freedom, science, and goodness.
A quick search online finds three prominent articles, all citing Jacobson, all insisting that the only conclusion we can see is that the U.S. Constitution holds that the State (just group of men and women – often coercing us through violence) has every right to force you to be injected.
Articles #1 from 2006
A medical doctor, and then law student, Sarah Fujiwara, writing in the AMA Journal of Ethics [sic], described a hypothetical circumstance where SARS cases are found in Canada, centered on a college student (Joseph), who has not been exposed. Dr. Fujiwara asks, “if the State of Illinois mandates a new experimental SARS vaccine, can Joseph refuse?” Referencing case law and invoking abstract notions about her hypothetical unexposed Joseph somehow being both contagious and a risk to others, Fujiwara concludes:
“Real liberty for all cannot exist if each individual is allowed to act without regard to the injury that his or her actions might cause others; liberty is constrained by law”; “It is immaterial whether … the vaccine is actually effective, so long as it is the belief of state authorities that the mandatory vaccine will promote common welfare … (drawing on the language of Jacobson , 197 at 35); “The only exception to a mandatory vaccination is an offer of apparent or reasonably certain proof, to the state board of health [sic ], that the vaccination would seriously impair health or probably cause death” (she offers Jacobson at 38, but there is no language in the opinion that describes exceptions or appeals to the Board of Health); “Consequently, our student, Joseph, does not have a valid argument against the mandatory vaccination.”
It is most apparent, from her brief review of Jacobson, that Dr. Fujiwara never read the case, does not know the pertinent facts, and or has no idea about the evolution of legal doctrines related to Constitutional law and due process since 1905.
Article #2 from 2019
A lawyer for the Congressional Research Service, Wen Shen, presented a memo titled: An Overview of State and Federal Authority to Impose Vaccination Requirements. Citing Jacobson, Shen finds that States have absolute power to require any and all vaccines. Shen (2019) claims that:
In 1905, the Supreme Court in Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts upheld a state law that gave municipal boards of health the authority to require [sic] the vaccination, of persons over the age of 21, against smallpox.
Shen (2019) mischaracterizes the legal issues in the case. Henning Jacobson brought a due process challenge to a criminal law. The law that grants him no opportunity to raise a defense. Jacobson, 197 U.S. at 17.
The case did not center on a forced injection – there was no force and there would be no injections. The challenge centered on the propriety and legality of imposing criminal penalties for those who refuse vaccination and play a form of Russian Roulette.
In regards to the ruling of both the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts and the U.S. Supreme Court, each upheld as valid a criminal law which expresses exemptions for unfit children. But there are no exemptions for unfit adults. Jacobson, 197 U.S. at 17.
Children were exempted from the fine by showing a doctor’s note that documented that they were unfit candidates for vaccination. Parents of exempted children were not liable for fines. [See R. L. c. 75, § 139 (1902)].
As for adults like Jacobson, the public health rule read like this: Get a shot, LEST you receive a $5 fine or remain imprisoned until the fine is paid. See Jacobson at 14.
Fine or Vaccination
Please note, writing the opinion for the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Harlan claims that the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts ruling that if Jacobson refuses to pay a fine or refuses vaccination, that he can be imprisoned indefinitely. However, no statutory reference is cited to support the notion that sanctions included imprisonment. Still, at that time, judges were permitted to issue incarceration orders against defendants who refused to pay fines. See, for example, Chapter 215 from the Public Statutes of Massachusetts of 1881.
All this aside, at a time when no laws could mandate quarantine of a healthy person, the particular text of the opinion from the Massachusetts high court omits any discussion of imprisonment (or even quarantine or home detention). See Commonwealth vs. Pear 183 Mass. 242 (1903). In siding against Jacobson, and explaining the extent of the penalties, Massachusetts Chief Justice Knowlton concluded:
If a person should deem it important that vaccination should not be performed in his case, and the authorities should think otherwise, it is not in their power to vaccinate him by force, and the worst that could happen to him under the statute would be the payment of the penalty of $5. Commonwealth vs. Pear, 83 Mass. 242 at 248 (1903).
Federal Mandate
When the Supreme Judicial Court held that Jacobson could only receive a fine, and the U.S. Supreme Court upheld that ruling, why would Wen Shen announce that the courts have held that vaccination can be forced?
Because the current talk about mass vaccination is really a discussion about the drive for a federally-mandated national program. Shen (2019) offers some discussion about federal versus state authority. Under the U.S. Constitution, matters of public health (general police power) are up to state jurisdiction. At present, without an Amendment, neither Congress nor the President can impose a mandatory vaccine scheme for the nation. Furthermore, any federal law would be limited by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
Shen (2019) shares:
Under RFRA, the federal government is prohibited from substantially burdening a person’s sincere exercise of religion, unless the government demonstrates [that] the application of the burden to the person represents the least restrictive means of advancing a compelling government interest.
But we know that the least restrictive means for anything is never to inject a person with an experimental and harmful substance called a vaccine. Furthermore, under the contagious germ theory, people who are neither carriers nor contagious pose no risk of harm to others. Hence, even confinement would not be justified.
Article #3 from 2020
This article is from The Hill. Writer Merrill Matthews addresses the specter of a COVID-19 vaccine and laws that would compel us to receive a shot.
Throughout his puff-piece, which ignores the data and serves as little more than native advertising for various pharmaceutical companies, Matthews advocates for flu shots. He also promotes the false concept of vaccine-induced herd immunity.
Matthews first assures us that he is a willing cult member. He writes, “When a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available, I will be one of the first in line.” Then he opines on the legal question:
If the government [sic] determines that vaccinations are essential to stemming the spread of the disease [sic] … could it mandate vaccination compliance? Apparently, it can — and it might.
In a twisted and misreading of Shen (2019), Matthews (2020) insists that Congress … has some authority over public health matters, including regulation of vaccination.
Of course, Congress can regulate vaccines – see the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. And Congress mandates injections for military personnel. But the Constitution grants Congress no power to create laws that would authorize our imprisonment and compel the population to submit to forced injections.
In Part 2 of this article, we will drill down into the Jacobson and what the law really said.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
John C. Jones received his law degree (2001) and his Ph.D. is in political science (2003) from the University of Iowa. He has over 15 years of research and writing (both academic and journalistic) in fields of public policy and law, criminal and Constitutional law, and philosophy of science and medicine. His additional areas of expertise and specialized knowledge include applied statistics, etymology, political communications/public relations, litigation, and court procedure. He has a particular interest in the science and history of vaccines.


vaxxter--2020-06-08--The Covid-19 Chronicles: Why Coronavirus and Censorship Don’t Mix

“ How can the whole world be lying , ” my mother innocently asked me when I told her that Covid-19 is the largest human experiment in history and that the mainstream media isn ’ t giving us the full picture .
There was a silent pause followed by “ But what about Dr. Fauci ?
” The following below is dedicated to my mom and anyone who can not fathom a Houdini magic trick carried out on a global scale , “ drifters ” who can not deal with negativity and grasp onto wisps of information without context or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by fear .
This is also dedicated to those who feel that something is off but were too busy buying toilet paper or washing their hands .
My hope is that you are looking for answers based on some inkling that there ’ s something nefarious happening behind the scenes that violate your civil liberties .
While the possibility of an arguably orchestrated “ artificial ” event is a huge ( red ) pill to swallow , I request you suspend your beliefs and take a journey with me through time .
Never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a global economy to a screeching halt .
The Coronavirus Chronicles aims at helping readers navigate Covid-19 , an “ infodemic ” of epic proportions , defined as an excessive amount of information making it difficult to suss out the truth .
To put things in perspective , this is not our first manufactured epidemic littered with excessive noise .
Same playbook .
Different “ virus.
” A 2014 poll concluded that with regards to the Ebola “ epidemic , ” the more information people consumed , the less they knew.
” ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ real ” for the West when two American mercenaries brought it home and survived , unlike countless blacks .
Up until then , Ebola had largely been considered an “ African Plague.
” ) Early on , investigative journalist Spiro Skouras of Activist Post described coronavirus as a “ Global 9/11.
” I separately found myself calling it “ a 9/11 to the 9/11.
” Because Covid-19 involves all of us “ together but apart , ” Covid-19 is like a fast-moving train that delivers “ news ” 24/7 through a variety of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you learn that only six corporations own 90 % of what you read , watch , and listen to .
This sheer fact alone should indicate how a narrative can be co-opted , maligned , and turned inside out .
Citizen journalists and the we-are-the-news movement have shined light between truth and the mainstream media .
We ’ ve caught them spreading lies about Covid-19 .
Examples include passing off footage of hospitals from another country as though it was from America , getting caught , and then doing it again and again @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media ( MSM ) or “ lame street media ” presstitutes continue to spread and publicize bloated death data to scare people .
The May 24 cover of The New York Times was basically an obituary for the state of New York .
Fear porn aux max .
And yet these are not accurate numbers .
First off , a primary reason the numbers are so sky-high is doctors and coroners are encouraged to say just about every cause of death is covid19 if corona was in present in any way .
Next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The CDC itself , whose tests were initially contaminated with coronavirus , state that the RT PCR tests are not a diagnostic tool and result in “ presumptive positives , ” a.k.a an assumption .
“ History-making decisions are being made due to these figures even though they ’ re flat out wrong , ” said Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek back in April .
Inventor Kary Mullis himself stated these tests are not diagnostic tools .
Plus , none of the tests are FDA-approved .
It ’ s all FDA-issue under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is where this story could end .
But no !
Meanwhile , NIH ’ s Dr. Anthony S. Fauci stated himself in the New England Journal Of Medicine that COVID-19 is no more fatal than the flu .
The CDC also now estimates the case fatality rate ( CFR ) of COVID-19 is only 4 % .4 percent .
And yet “ [ W ] e were subjected to hundreds of stories like this one from CNBC headlined , WHO Says Coronavirus Death Rate Is 3.4 % Globally , .Higher Than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To add insult to injury , the CDC has been combining active infection rates with those that detect recovery from Covid-19 , further bloating the numbers .
“ One of the agency ’ s data tracker websites has been lumping them together , ” reported Yahoo News .
And pre-existing conditions are not even considered as a cause of death when it comes to signing off on a death certificate , something Dr. Deborah Birx concluded herself during an April 7 presser .
Finally , if you need a cherry on this coronavirus-flavored @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s full of genetically-modified information , empty calories , and toxic , bleached , sugar-coated bullshit , the Gates-funded predictive models were also flawed .
What made Neil Ferguson of Imperial College reverse his claims and admit he was wrong ?
He ended up resigning from his government advisory group SAGE after The Telegraph revealed he broke lockdown and met with his married lover .
Was he let go once his mission was determined a fait accompli ?
The trajectory was wrong .
So did that end the lockdowns ?
No !
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gone from virus to violence , resulting in open fires and mayhem in the streets .
( This opens another debate since disruptors , including Officer Derek Chauvin , were arguably hired to disrupt peaceful protestors and fuel race wars . )
Maybe just maybe the data deluge serves a bigger purpose .
What is real ?
What is false ?
“ Information glut ” was how now-deceased Canadian philosopher and visionary Marshall McLuhan referred to the onslaught of information he saw on the horizon with regards to the media .
He also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fragmented niches , positing that culture could best be understood through its “ tools for conversation.
” What happens when those tools are weaponized to suppress , muzzle , vaporize , ban , and DEMONitize ?
McLuhan didn ’ t foresee that consequences .
Which brings me to the usual suspects of online social media platforms such as Facebook , Google , and Twitter that now openly take marching orders from the WHO , HHS , and CDC .
Is it due to “ high demand ” for valid information for the sake @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an emergency ?
But we ’ ve just established that this is no worse than the flu .
While it may be contagious and there may be several strains and it could have been engineered , Covid-19 is seemingly being USED to further impede our medical freedom .
To create a divide and conquer strategy .
To mask and dehumanize us .
To mandate vaccines .
To make alterations and malign the very definition of “ autonomy.
” According to the Contact Tracing course I enrolled in to spy on snitch mentality , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when the greater good is supposedly put at risk .
Covid-19 amounts to a free pass for globalists to extend their tentacles into whatever they wish .
Today Big Tech is Big Pharma .
Since I first reported about technofascism in August 2019 , Big Tech and Big Pharma have become practically interchangeable .
Enter bona fide journalists , scientists , whistleblowers , dissidents , and intellectual free-thinking refugees — true truthers who choose to sift through a bazillion proverbial puzzle pieces .
Why are we smeared and targeted for trying to fit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spreading what “ they ” deem misinformation may soon become a punishable crime .
Now factor in that Google , the world ’ s biggest search engine , no longer offers organic searches , but instead autosuggestions that tow an agenda line .
Autosuggestions are an easy but powerful mind control tool .
If you omit information and don ’ t have all the details of a situation or condition , your perception is shunted , ultimately impacting beliefs and behavior .
“ …Writing “ freezes speech ” in an unalterable form , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thoughts to inspire a critical reaction , to create an ongoing conversation that only deepens the perspectives of the original thought.
” Arguably critical thinking is no longer welcome ; hence , the 1984-esque vaporization of online articles , studies , channels , and human rage .
Why are 404s at an all-time high ?
Here , we see a Reddit page that ironically got “ quarantined ” for trying to challenge the narrative .
And the publications that do present valuable information ( think ZeroHedge ) get booted off .
Twitter becomes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ engine you use .
( I highly recommend using Qwant as your search engine . )
You often have to find them amid an onslaught of articles that discredit their views .
For example , Snopes has created The Coronavirus Collection : Fact-Checking Covid-19 .
I personally don ’ t feel a sense of trust when I witness governmental bodies spreading mixed messages while we the people are the ones that suffer the repercussions .
For instance , the World Health Organization flip-flopped on whether this virus was from The Coronavirus Collection , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ days .
It ’ s like we have amnesia that Big Ag and Big Pharma have been slowly assaulting our immune system , priming the body for the perfect cytokine storm .
If seen through the proper lens , this realization could spur a massive awakening to the lies we ’ ve been force-fed .
Despite the litany of injuries and fatalities under the watch of the western medical establishment , Big Pharma continues to call the shots ( pun intended ) , and get away with literal murder .
Indemnified , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who not only dare to question the official Covid-19 narrative but health professionals who dare suggest natural solutions can even prevent illness .
The FDA actually has an operation called “ Quack Hack ” whose modus operandi is projections and inverted truths .
“ At this point , the tactic of the Great Hidden Hands of Controlling the Masses is to Turn Everything into a Psychological Operation .
Regardless of whether there is any truth or not , ” a follower wrote to me .
For those of us who have studied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we ’ ve seen these manufactured outbreaks happen before , not only on Planet Earth with Zika and the anthrax letters , but also in Hollywood .
For instance , take the 2003 TV show called Dead Zone Plague which mentions masks , a lockdown , coronavirus , and HCQ .
How can this be ?
It was 17 years ago !
And don ’ t you scratch your head given the 2008 Hollywood flick Contagion was about a highly contagious deadly virus that spreads throughout the world , starts in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of “ social distancing ?
” The tension in the film between the CDC and WHO mounts .
Jude Law represents the Conspiracy Theorists .
It ’ s called Predictive Programming .
And it ’ s been happening for decades .
Pschological operations to control our minds .
“ Predictive programming is a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented by our leaders .
If and when these changes are put through , the public will already be familiarized with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ progressions , thus lessening possible public resistance and commotion.
” The Contagion filmmakers consulted with the CDC in the making of the film .
In fact , the CDC has an entire department dedicated to Hollywood .
In the past , they have paid employees to watch soap operas and make sure T.V characters speak about health ‘ accurately.
’ Back in 2016 , virtually every national government on the planet met at the 70th annual General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York to adopt a draconian 15-year master plan for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as former NATO chief Javier Solana , a socialist , celebrated the plan , which the summit unanimously “ approved , ” as the next “ Great Leap Forward ” —yes , the old campaign slogan of the Chinese Communist Party .
“ Stopping the Spread ” and “ Flattening the Curve ” are wonderful propaganda slogans to meddle in our lives under the guise of an emergency and global crisis .
“ Covid-19 , a highly survivable , contagious respiratory ailment , has taken the place of Terrorism as the Dark @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The same methodical propaganda campaigns—heavy on hypnotic repetition , emotional appeal , guilt , and shame—have kicked into high gear to strip us of our few remaining rights , ” writes journalist Helen Buyniski .
This event arguably ushers in a myriad of globalist plans that were devised ages ago .
Agenda 2030 addresses biometrics , satellites in space , the installation of 5G , the coverup of left-leaning corruption , the hijacking of 2020 elections , digital certificates , mandatory vaccines for all , and much more .
This is the beginning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now of a second wave after a summer break .
Ousted ( FAUX ) whistleblower Rick Bright warns that the U.S faces the darkest winter in modern history.
” While Dr. Hans Kluge , Director of the WHO European region , says he ’ s “ very concerned ” a second wave will coincide with the flu season .
“ Dark Winter ” is not only a reference to HBO ’ s Game of Thrones but a smallpox “ simulation ” that went awry in 2001 .
“ The abdication of one ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for supposed security is a regrettable recurrence in the story of human history .
The exchange is a sucker ’ s deal .
The State & the elite who run it are rewarded at the expense of an imprisoned population.
” Do you stand for medical freedom ?
Or tyranny delivered via a forced-upon poison-filled syringe ?
The great divide is before us .
( Next , I will be exploring the prequel leading up to coronavirus starting with LockStep 2010 .
Followed by the timeline from December to the present .
Buckle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ journalist , functional medicine consultant , and founder and editor-in-chief of HoneyColony .
She is also the director of the award-winning documentary film Vanishing of the Bees , narrated by Ellen Page .
She is currently being shadowbanned .
Please follower her on Twitter

“It’s not the germ, it’s the false announcement of the germ. It’s the concoction of an apparition, a ghost, a phantom. That’s how you launch a fake pandemic. That’s how you sell fear. That’s how you try to make people take their vaccines and keep their mouths shut.” Jon Rappoport, March 26, 2016
COVID-19: Infodemic Insanity – Connecting The Dots
“How can the whole world be lying,” my mother innocently asked me when I told her that COVID-19 is the largest human experiment in history and that the mainstream media isn’t giving us the full picture. There was a silent pause followed by, “But what about Dr. Fauci?”
The following below is dedicated to my mom and anyone who cannot fathom a Houdini magic trick carried out on a global scale. To all “drifters” who cannot deal with negativity and grasp onto wisps of information without context or substance. And/or those gripped and immobilized by fear. I also dedicate this to those who feel that something is off but were too busy buying toilet paper or washing their hands.
My hope is that you are looking for answers based on some inkling that there’s something nefarious happening behind the scenes that violate your civil liberties.
While the possibility of an arguably orchestrated “artificial” event is a huge (red) pill to swallow, I request you suspend your beliefs and take a journey with me through time. Never before in history has an outbreak brought a global economy to a screeching halt.
Coronavirus Chornicles
The Coronavirus Chronicles aims at helping readers navigate COVID-19, an “infodemic” of epic proportions, defined as an excessive amount of information making it difficult to suss out the truth.
To put things in perspective, this is not our first manufactured epidemic littered with excessive noise. Same playbook. Different “virus.”
A 2014 poll concluded that with regards to the Ebola “epidemic,” the more information people consumed, the less they knew. (Ironically, this epidemic only became “real” for the West when two American mercenaries brought it home. They survived, unlike countless Africans. Up until then, Ebola was largely an “African Plague” by consideration.)
Early on, investigative journalist Spiro Skouras of Activist Post described coronavirus as a “Global 9/11.” I separately found myself calling it “a 9/11 to the 9/11.”
Because the “virus” involves all of us “together but apart,” COVID-19 is like a fast-moving train that delivers “news” 24/7 through a variety of channels. Yet, when you investigate, you learn that only six corporations own 90% of what you read, watch, and listen to. This sheer fact alone should indicate how a narrative can be co-opted, maligned, and turned inside out.
Who Runs the World?
Citizen journalists and the we-are-the-news movement have shined light between truth and the mainstream media. We’ve caught them spreading lies about COVID-19. Examples include passing off footage of hospitals from another country as though it was from America. Then getting caught, and then doing it again and again. Unpunished. Incredulous.
The mainstream media (MSM) or “lame street media” presstitutes continue to spread and publicize bloated death data to scare people. The May 24 cover of The New York Times was basically an obituary for the state of New York. Fear porn aux max.
And yet these are not accurate numbers. First off, a primary reason the numbers are so sky-high is doctors and coroners are saying just about every cause of death is COVID-19. If corona is present in present in any way, the death makes the cut.
Next, the tests need to be tested. The CDC itself, whose tests were initially contaminated with coronavirus, state that the RT PCR tests are not a diagnostic tool and result in “presumptive positives,” a.k.a an assumption.
“History-making decisions are being made due to these figures even though they’re flat out wrong,” said Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek back in April.
Inventor Kary Mullis himself stated these tests are not diagnostic tools. Plus, none of the tests have FDA approval. It’s all FDA-issue under “Emergency Authorization Use (EUA). This is where this story could end. But no!
Is It Fatal or Not?
Meanwhile, NIH’s Dr. Anthony S. Fauci stated himself in the New England Journal Of Medicine that COVID-19 is no more fatal than the flu. The CDC also now estimates the case fatality rate (CFR) of COVID-19 is only 4.4%.
And yet “[W]e were subjected to hundreds of stories like this one from CNBC headlined, WHO Says Coronavirus Death Rate Is 3.4% Globally Higher Than Previously Thought,” writes RedState.
To add insult to injury, the CDC has been combining active infection rates with those that detect recovery from COVID-19, further bloating the numbers. “One of the agency’s data tracker websites has been lumping them together,” reported Yahoo News.
And pre-existing conditions are not even considered as a cause of death when it comes to signing off on a death certificate, something Dr. Deborah Birx concluded herself during an April 7 presser.
Finally, if you need a cherry on this coronavirus-flavored cake to convince you that it’s full of genetically-modified information, empty calories, and toxic, bleached, sugar-coated bullshit, the Gates-funded predictive models were also flawed. What made Neil Ferguson of Imperial College reverse his claims and admit he was wrong? He ended up resigning from his government advisory group SAGE after The Telegraph revealed he broke lockdown and met with his married lover. Was he let go once his mission was determined a fait accompli?
The trajectory was wrong. So did that end the lockdowns? No! The sham show continues. We’ve gone from virus to violence, resulting in open fires and mayhem in the streets. (This opens another debate since disruptors, including Officer Derek Chauvin, arguably had an assignment to disrupt peaceful protestors and fuel race wars.)
Technofascism: Big Tech Is Big Pharma Now
Maybe, just maybe, the data deluge serves a bigger purpose. What is real? What is false?
“Information glut” was how now-deceased Canadian philosopher and visionary Marshall McLuhan referred to the onslaught of information he saw on the horizon with regards to the media. He also predicted a “Global Village” and fragmented niches, positing that culture could best be understood through its “tools for conversation.” What happens when those tools are weaponized to suppress, muzzle, vaporize, ban, and DEMONitize? McLuhan didn’t foresee that consequences.
Which brings me to the usual suspects of online social media platforms such as Facebook, Google, and Twitter that now openly take marching orders from the WHO, HHS, and CDC.
Come again?
Why?
Is it due to “high demand” for valid information for the sake of public health? Is this under the guise of an emergency? But we’ve just established that this is no worse than the flu. While it may be contagious, there may be several strains and it could have been engineered. COVID-19 is seemingly being USED to further impede our medical freedom. To create a divide and conquer strategy; to mask and dehumanize us; to mandate vaccines. And to make alterations and malign the very definition of “autonomy.”
Contact Tracing
According to the Contact Tracing course I enrolled in to spy on snitch mentality, “autonomy” doesn’t apply when the greater good is supposedly put at risk. COVID-19 amounts to a free pass for globalists to extend their tentacles into whatever they wish. Today, Big Tech is Big Pharma. Since I first reported about technofascism in August 2019, Big Tech and Big Pharma have become practically interchangeable.
Enter bona fide journalists, scientists, whistleblowers, dissidents, and intellectual free-thinking refugees. All true truthers who choose to sift through a bazillion proverbial puzzle pieces. Why are they smearing and targeting us for trying to fit them together?
In the U.K., spreading what “they” deem misinformation may soon become a punishable crime.
Now factor in that Google, the world’s biggest search engine, no longer offers organic searches, but instead autosuggestions that tow an agenda line. Autosuggestions are an easy but powerful mind control tool. If you omit information and don’t have all the details of a situation or condition, your perception is shunted, ultimately impacting beliefs and behavior.
“Writing “freezes speech” in an unalterable form, it allows for one man’s thoughts to inspire a critical reaction, to create an ongoing conversation that only deepens the perspectives of the original thought.”
“Please Try Again”
Arguably critical thinking is no longer welcome; hence, the 1984-esque vaporization of online articles, studies, channels, and human rage. Why are 404s at an all-time high?
Here, we see a Reddit page that ironically got “quarantined” for trying to challenge the narrative.
And the publications that do present valuable information (think ZeroHedge) get booted off. Twitter becomes harder to find depending on which search engine you use. (I highly recommend using Qwant as your search engine.) You often have to find them amid an onslaught of articles that discredit their views. For example, Snopes has created The Coronavirus Collection: Fact-Checking COVID-19.
I personally don’t feel a sense of trust when I witness governmental bodies spreading mixed messages while we the people are the ones that suffer the repercussions. For instance, the World Health Organization flip-flopped on whether this virus was from The Coronavirus Collection, transmissible via humans in a matter of days.
Pharmakeia: Sorcery and Satan Up Ahead?
It’s like we have amnesia that Big Ag and Big Pharma have been slowly assaulting our immune system, priming the body for the perfect cytokine storm. If seen through the proper lens, this realization could spur a massive awakening to the lies we’ve been force-fed.
Despite the litany of injuries and fatalities under the watch of the western medical establishment, Big Pharma continues to call the shots (pun intended) and get away with literal murder. Indemnified, they now censor and smear with brazen impunity those who not only dare to question the official COVID-19 narrative but health professionals who dare suggest natural solutions can even prevent illness. The FDA actually has an operation called “Quack Hack” whose modus operandi is projections and inverted truths.
“At this point, the tactic of the Great Hidden Hands of Controlling the Masses is to Turn Everything into a Psychological Operation. Regardless of whether there is any truth or not,” a follower wrote to me.
For those of us who have studied Big Pharma and their Hegelian dialectic playbook, we’ve seen these manufactured outbreaks happen before, not only on Planet Earth with Zika and the anthrax letters, but also in Hollywood.
For instance, take the 2003 TV show called Dead Zone Plague which mentions masks, a lockdown, coronavirus, and HCQ. How can this be? It was 17 years ago!
We’ve Seen this Already
And don’t you scratch your head given the 2008 Hollywood flick Contagion was about a highly contagious deadly virus that spreads throughout the world, starts in a wet market in China, and spoke of “social distancing?” The tension in the film between the CDC and WHO mounts. Jude Law represents the Conspiracy Theorists.
Watch this clip!
Predictive Programming is the name. And it’s been happening for decades. Pschological operations to control our minds.
Predictive programming is a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented by our leaders. If and when these changes are put through, the public will already be familiarized with them and will accept them as natural progressions, thus lessening possible public resistance and commotion.
The Contagion filmmakers consulted with the CDC in the making of the film. In fact, the CDC has an entire department dedicated to Hollywood. In the past, they have paid employees to watch soap operas and make sure TV characters speak about health “accurately.”
2030: A Ten-Year P*landemic Ahead?
Back in 2016, virtually every national government on the planet met at the 70th annual General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York to adopt a draconian 15-year master plan for the planet called Agenda 2030. Top globalists such as former NATO chief Javier Solana, a socialist, celebrated the plan, which the summit unanimously “approved,” as the next “Great Leap Forward” — yes, the old campaign slogan of the Chinese Communist Party.
“Stopping the Spread” and “Flattening the Curve” are wonderful propaganda slogans to meddle in our lives under the guise of an emergency and global crisis. “COVID-19, a highly survivable, contagious respiratory ailment, has taken the place of Terrorism as the Dark Force threatening our Way of Life. The same methodical propaganda campaigns—heavy on hypnotic repetition, emotional appeal, guilt, and shame—have kicked into high gear to strip us of our few remaining rights,” writes journalist Helen Buyniski.
This event arguably ushers in a myriad of globalist plans from ages ago. Agenda 2030 addresses biometrics, satellites in space, the installation of 5G, the coverup of left-leaning corruption, the hijacking of 2020 elections, digital certificates, mandatory vaccines for all, and much more. This is the beginning of a ten-year plan, with talks now of a second wave after a summer break.
Ousted (FAUX) whistleblower Rick Bright warns that the U.S. faces the darkest winter in modern history.” While Dr. Hans Kluge, Director of the WHO European region, says he’s “very concerned” a second wave will coincide with the flu season.
Another Simulation?
“Dark Winter” is not only a reference to HBO’s Game of Thrones but a smallpox “simulation” that went awry in 2001.
“The abdication of one’s liberty to the State in exchange for supposed security is a regrettable recurrence in the story of human history. The exchange is a sucker’s deal. The State & the elite who run it are rewarded at the expense of an imprisoned population.”
Do you stand for medical freedom? Or tyranny delivered via a forced-upon poison-filled syringe? The great divide is before us.
(Next, I will be exploring the prequel leading up to coronavirus starting with LockStep 2010. Followed by the timeline from December to the present. Buckle up!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Maryam Henein is an investigative journalist, functional medicine consultant, and founder and editor-in-chief of HoneyColony. She is also the director of the award-winning documentary film Vanishing of the Bees, narrated by Ellen Page. She is currently being shadowbanned. Please follower her on Twitter