vaxxter--2020-06-19--Bill Gates Endgame: Contact Tracing

Bill Gates Endgame: Contact Tracing

In the wake of the COVID-19 comet that burst onto the scene at the start of the year that lead to sheltering people in place , shuttering businesses , putting tens of millions out of work , and tyrannical rules , new behavioral controls were enacted in haste .
Were those measures rolled out to ensure the health of people around the world ?
Or were they imposed with its real agenda hidden ?
Did the changes have long phases of development ?
Or were they contrived and implemented on the fly ?
These questions , and many others , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s true nature and whether global health officials have humanity ’ s best interest when creating COVID19 policies .
Beyond the rules of wearing masks outdoors and maintaining social distance , we learned that while the RT-PCR test ( reverse transcription polymerise chain reaction ) is accurate in detecting the human immunodeficiency virus ( HIV ) in blood , but not in identifying the SARS-CoV-2 virus .
The tests have been burdened with faulty results , leading to thousands of false-positive tests , including labs that gave fruits and goats from Tanzania @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the kits came contaminated with coronavirus strains .
And we have learned that in some states , positive swabs and serology tests taken from the same person were counted 2 and 3 times , increasing the number of “ positive ” tests .
Then , we also heard about the contamination at the CDC lab that delayed the rollout of the COVID-19 tests , as reported in the Washington Post .
There are reports that the CDC refused to purchase Germany ’ s diagnostic test kits which proved to be one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus .
They were widely used with measurable success because Germany tested far more people than the United Kingdom and the United States from the outset .
Some believed that the CDC wanted to capitalize on the opportunity , by patenting its own test kit in order to reap the profits .
That would empower the CDC to become the central gatekeeper in the coronavirus battle for years to come .
A Maryland law firm , Weltchek , Mallahan & Weltchek Attorneys at Law , exposed that the CDC owns more than 50 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that fits a pattern .
In the 1990s , CDC Director Robert R. Redfield tried to corner the AIDs vaccine market .
He would have succeeded with the development of a dangerous vaccine except for the U.S. Air Force officer-turned-whistleblower who came forward to expose the data manipulation before the vaccine made it through the FDA ’ s Phase III trial .
It should be no surprise that Redfield ’ s name is also linked as a co-inventor of five patents .
When Left-leaning magazine , The Atlantic outed the CDC and many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conflating viral and antibody tests ” at the end of May , public trust eroded in the health agency funded and designed over the decades to protect U.S. taxpayers from this type of event .
Take the recent hospital raid by Brazilian parliament members who had received a report that the hospital had had 5,000 coronavirus cases and 200 deaths .
The field trip , which was caught on video and shared widely on Twitter , showed the hospital didn ’ t have any coronavirus patients .
Not a single one .
Truths @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data .
They also point out multinational collusion and reveal the silhouette of a hidden agenda being propagated 24/7 by the pharma-bought media .
The propaganda is done in sync with international governments and government health agencies under the cover of a complicit tech sector that censors debate and blocks all views that challenge the mainstream medical orthodoxy .
Beyond the flat out lies about the data and number of deaths , there is contact tracing—the ultimate surveillance tool .
In the near-term , we have been bought the need for contact tracing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is to track anyone who may have come in contact with a person who is “ positive ” for the coronavirus , whatever that means , over the last two weeks .
The tracking , eh spying , on others could produce a short list of names to trace , including persons who have decided to shelter-in-place and rarely go out .
Or it could generate a long list of names , including those who actively participate in society and take public transportation to go to work at an essential facility .
On @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It ’ s a process used to map out the spread of a virus .
It ’ s not new .
For example , it has been used in the past to track sexually transmitted diseases and cancer clusters that have an environmental factor .
Another example was in 2014 , when the World Health Organization used contact tracing to track the spread of Ebola in West Africa .
From this experience , the WHO produced a 36-page guide for health professionals and partners , titled , “ Implementation and Management of Contact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] .
” Section 1.3 – ‘ Contact tracing in the overall EVD response ’ reads : “ Contact tracing is a critical tool for controlling an EVD outbreak but represents only one aspect of a multifaceted control strategy for EVD outbreaks .
Contact tracing is intricately connected to case finding ( surveillance ) and case investigation processes ; the detection of an EVD case activates the case investigation process , at which time contacts are identified , initiating the contact tracing process… ” What it means today is simple .
Once people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an infected person , authorities will seek to have the others tested for coronavirus .
If the faulty COVID19 tests and conflated/inflated numbers weren ’ t bad enough , if an asymptomatic ‘ traced person ’ returned a positive test , the result would go into multiple health registries , including local and state police , federal law enforcement in the FBI , DHS , the TSA , and all types of health agencies , here and abroad .
The vendors hired by the CDC and state health departments will also have access @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your contacts .
Despite guarantees from the testing firms that they won ’ t share the infected person ’ s name with others in the network , the may still mine the data and share or sell it to government agencies and pharmaceutical companies .
One example is how GlaskoSmithKlein ( GSK ) acquired 23andMe .
That acquisition released all that data into the belly of the beast .
If Bill Gates and his partners have their way , they will be able to map and monitor every aspect of your life .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ or who have been – infected .
They will know the health status of everyone in real-time .
They will see people ’ s comorbidities .
And when the time comes , they will see who has taken the rushed COVID19 vaccines .
If the new vaccine leads to a more virulent mutant virus or those who are vaccinated become more susceptible to harm during the “ second wave ” then they are predicting , it will be difficult to prove .
And harder to defend .
By then , it would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vital to see all those who are behind the curtain pulling the strings of contact tracing .
Who are these nefarious groups and persons ?
They have familiar names : The CDC , the WHO , The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , Unitaid , Dr. Anthony Fauci/NIAID , and many others .
Google , Apple , and Microsoft have also entered the fold .
Then there are the startups with new downloadable apps , such as CoviPass , that will use Bluetooth to trace people .
One such company , Partners in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Board .
At first glance , a board seat to Chelsea Clinton might not seem so out of the ordinary .
That is , until one learns that a pair of tax investigating whistleblowers , Lawrence Doyle and former DEA supervisor John Moynihan , uncovered the Clinton Foundation funnels tens of millions of dollars into the Gates Foundation through multilayered health initiatives .
Doyle and Moynihan exposed a meeting of U.S. Congressional officials attending an Aspen Institute conference last August in Rwanda .
That meeting was a host to a venerable Who ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were two representatives from the Gates Foundation and several executives from Partners in Health .
There were also eight U.S .
Congressmen in attendance including Bobby Rush ( D-IL ) , the principle author of the HR-6666 $ 100 billion Trace Act that was introduced shortly after the end of the conference .
Doyle and Moynihan claim that HR-6666 was first concocted at that Rwanda conference and was designed to infiltrate the lives , homes , and families of American citizens .
When the Clinton Foundation and the Gates Foundation work together to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” to the pandemic , one should pause .
With the implementation of contact tracing as a mass surveillance and data collection tool , we should be deeply concerned .
We must question everything about this pandemic , from the new rules on masks and social distancing to the bogus tests and the invasive surveillance .
We must wake up to the fact that the global elitists are setting us up to profit off enormously from the Plan-demic sham .
They not only want to track your every move , but they also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of your life .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist , covering subjects from autism , its cause and treatments , clean technology , green energy , and the BP Oil Spill , to business and Wall Street , and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics since 2005 .
He is the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area .
He is the author of Master Manipulator : The Explosive True Story of Fraud , Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC .

By James Grundvig, Investigative Reporter, Vaxxter contributor
In the wake of the COVID-19 comet that burst onto the scene at the start of the year that lead to sheltering people in place, shuttering businesses, putting tens of millions out of work, and tyrannical rules, new behavioral controls were enacted in haste. Were those measures rolled out to ensure the health of people around the world? Or were they imposed with its real agenda hidden? Did the changes have long phases of development? Or were they contrived and implemented on the fly?
These questions, and many others, must be answered to understand the pandemic’s true nature. Additionally, we need to understand whether global health officials have humanity’s best interest when creating COVID-19 policies.
Faulty Testing
Beyond the rules of wearing masks outdoors and maintaining social distance, we learned that while the RT-PCR test (reverse transcription polymerise chain reaction) is accurate in detecting the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in blood, but not in identifying the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The tests have been burdened with faulty results, leading to thousands of false-positive tests, including labs that gave fruits and goats from Tanzania infected results. We learned that some of the kits came contaminated with coronavirus strains. And we have learned that in some states, positive swabs and serology tests taken from the same person were counted 2 and 3 times, increasing the number of “positive” tests. Then, we also heard about the contamination at the CDC lab that delayed the rollout of the COVID-19 tests, as reported in the Washington Post.
There are reports that the CDC refused to purchase Germany’s diagnostic test kits which proved to be one of the first reliable means of detecting the virus. They were widely used with measurable success because Germany tested far more people than the United Kingdom and the United States from the outset. Some believe the CDC wanted to capitalize on the opportunity. Their best method be by patenting their own test kit in order to reap the profits. That would empower the CDC to become the central gatekeeper in the coronavirus battle for years to come. A Maryland law firm, Weltchek, Mallahan & Weltchek Attorneys at Law, exposed that the CDC owns more than 50 patents related to vaccines. So, that fits a pattern.
CDC Medling
In the 1990s, CDC Director Robert R. Redfield tried to corner the AIDs vaccine market. He would have succeeded with the development of a dangerous vaccine except for the U.S. Air Force officer-turned-whistleblower who came forward to expose the data manipulation before the vaccine made it through the FDA’s Phase III trial. It should be no surprise that Redfield’s name is also linked as a co-inventor of five patents.
When Left-leaning magazine, The Atlantic outed the CDC and many blue states’ health officials for “conflating viral and antibody tests” at the end of May, public trust eroded in the health agency funded and designed over the decades to protect U.S. taxpayers from this type of event. Take the recent hospital raid by Brazilian parliament members. The raid was based on a report that the hospital had had 5,000 coronavirus cases and 200 deaths. The field trip, which was caught on video and shared widely on Twitter, showed the hospital didn’t have any coronavirus patients. Not a single one.
Truths like these magnify the cooked and manipulated data. They also point out multinational collusion. Additionally, they reveal the silhouette of a hidden agenda being propagated 24/7 by the pharma-bought media. The propaganda is done in sync with international governments and government health agencies. They use the cover of a complicit tech sector that censors debate and blocks all views that challenge the mainstream medical orthodoxy.
Contact Tracing’s True Design
Beyond the flat out lies about the data and number of deaths, there is contact tracing—the ultimate surveillance tool.
In the near-term, we have been bought the need for contact tracing to contain the pandemic. The idea is to track anyone who may have come in contact with a person who is “positive” for the coronavirus, whatever that means, over the last two weeks. The tracking, eh spying, on others could produce a shortlist of names to trace. A list including persons who have decided to shelter-in-place and rarely go out. Or it could generate a long list of names. A list including people who actively participate in society or take public transportation to go to work.
On paper, contact tracing seems logical. It’s a process used to map out the spread of a virus. It’s not new. For example, it’s been used in the past to track STDs and cancer clusters that have an environmental factor. Another example was in 2014, when the WHO used contact tracing to track the spread of Ebola in West Africa. From this experience, the WHO produced a 36-page guide for health professionals and partners, titled, “Implementation and Management of Contact Tracing for Ebola Virus Disease [EVD].”
A Critical Tool
Section 1.3 – ‘Contact tracing in the overall EVD response’ reads:
“Contact tracing is a critical tool for controlling an EVD outbreak but represents only one aspect of a multifaceted control strategy for EVD outbreaks. Contact tracing is intricately connected to case finding (surveillance) and case investigation processes; the detection of an EVD case activates the case investigation process, at which time contacts are identified, initiating the contact tracing process…”
What it means today is simple. Once people have been traced in a network of an infected person, authorities will seek to have the others tested. If the faulty COVID19 tests and conflated/inflated numbers weren’t bad enough, if an asymptomatic ‘traced person’ returned a positive test, the result would go into multiple health registries, including local and state police, federal law enforcement in the FBI, DHS, the TSA, and all types of health agencies, here and abroad. The vendors hired by the CDC and state health departments will also have access to your personal data. Additionally, they’ll have access to all of your contacts.
Despite guarantees from the testing firms that they won’t share the infected person’s name with others in the network, the may still mine the data and share or sell it to government agencies and pharmaceutical companies. One example is how GlaskoSmithKlein (GSK) acquired 23andMe. That acquisition released all that data into the belly of the beast.
Stealth Use
If Bill Gates and his partners have their way, they will be able to map and monitor every aspect of your life. They will identify those who are – or who have been – infected. They will know the health status of everyone in real-time. They’ll see people’s comorbidities. And when the time comes, they will see who has taken the rushed COVID-19 vaccines.
If the new vaccine leads to a more virulent mutant virus or those who are vaccinated become more susceptible to harm during the “second wave” then they are predicting, it will be difficult to prove. And harder to defend.
By then, it would be too late.
Thus, it is vital to see all those who are behind the curtain pulling the strings of contact tracing. Who are these nefarious groups and persons? They have familiar names: The CDC, the WHO, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Unitaid, Dr. Anthony Fauci/NIAID, and many others. Google, Apple, and Microsoft have also entered the fold. Then there are the startups with new downloadable apps, such as CoviPass, that will use Bluetooth to trace people. One such company, Partners in Health, has Chelsea Clinton on its Board.
Clinton Foundation Involvement
At first glance, a board seat to Chelsea Clinton might not seem so out of the ordinary. That is, until one learns about a pair of tax investigating whistleblowers. Lawrence Doyle and former DEA supervisor John Moynihan uncovered money funneling. Their notes show the Clinton Foundation funnels tens of millions of dollars into the Gates Foundation through multilayered health initiatives.
Doyle and Moynihan exposed a meeting of U.S. Congressional officials attending an Aspen Institute conference last August in Rwanda. That meeting was a host to a venerable Who’s Who of contact tracing. There were two representatives from the Gates Foundation and several executives from Partners in Health. There were also eight U.S. Congressmen in attendance including Bobby Rush (D-IL), the principle author of the HR-6666 $100 billion Trace Act that was introduced shortly after the end of the conference.
Doyle and Moynihan claim that HR-6666 was first concocted at that Rwanda conference and was designed to infiltrate the lives, homes, and families of American citizens.
When the Clinton Foundation and the Gates Foundation work together to promote vaccines as the only “solution” to the pandemic, one should pause. With the implementation of contact tracing as a mass surveillance and data collection tool, we should be deeply concerned.
We must question everything about this pandemic; from the new rules on masks and social distancing to the bogus tests and the invasive surveillance. We must wake up to the fact that the global elitists are setting us up. A set up just to enormously profit from the Plan-demic sham. They don’t just want to track your every move. They also want to own and control every aspect of your life.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist, covering subjects from autism, its cause and treatments, clean technology, green energy, and the BP Oil Spill, to business and Wall Street, and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics since 2005. He is the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain logistics in the Construction IT space. James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area. He is the author of Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC.
photo credit: ID 184181087 © Elizaveta Galitskaya


vaxxter--2020-07-03--Dr. Fauci is No Nostradamus: How COVID-19 Ran Amok Under His Watch

Michel de Nostradamus was born in Saint-Remy , South of France , in 1503 .
Beyond the gifts he would one day explore in astrology , he pursued an education to become a physician .
After his first year at the University of Avignon , an outbreak of the plague swept through France , forcing the University to close .
Undaunted , Nostradamus opened an apothecary before attending the University of Montpellier in pursuit of a doctorate .
But a second plague struck disrupting his plan ; the plague also killed his first wife and two children .
During the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fight against and contain the plague .
They succeeded .
Nostradamus remarried , engendered six children , and wrote an almanac .
Well received , he developed his ability as a seer , with a mix of astrology and biblical end-times visions , to become the world ’ s most famous prognosticator of the last one thousand years .
He captured his dark revelations in The Prophecies , writing a collection of 942 quatrains .
Knowing more about his life , pursuits , interests , and experiences—a survivor of two plagues , fighting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now see Nostradamus in a new light .
It ’ s no wonder that his visions leaned toward doom and gloom .
By contrast , Dr. Anthony Fauci , born on Christmas Eve in 1940 in Brooklyn , New York , has lived a vastly different life .
Yet , there are parallels between the two men .
Both pursued a career as a physician .
Both experienced two plagues during their lifetimes .
In Fauci ’ s case , he was thrust into the epicenter of the 1980s AIDS/HIV epidemic when he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease ( NIAID ) .
In spring 2020 , he roamed center stage of the COVID19 pandemic , featured as one of the “ experts ” on the White House Task Force .
The big delta between Dr. Fauci and Nostradamus boils down to the ability to predict the future .
Beyond Nostradamus ’ uncanny ability to predict the first two World Wars , two of the three “ antichrists ” in Napoleon and Hitler , the assassinations of U.S. presidents , and the 9/11 attack on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Fauci predicted a pandemic in 2017 , a measly three years before it took place .
Dr. Fauci shared his foresight with medical peers at a Georgetown forum when he stated , “ There will be a surprise outbreak during Trump ’ s first term.
” Fauci ’ s prediction wasn ’ t conjured from the alignment of the stars and planets , or a passage lifted out of the Bible .
No .
He didn ’ t develop any such gift .
Instead , he arrived at his foresight by steering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” research .
In 2018 , he joined the World Health Organization ’ s ( WHO ) new unit , Global Preparedness Monitoring Board ( GPMB ) to be hands-on with pandemic planning , a full year after his “ prophecy.
” He likely advised or took part in the development of the World Bank ’ s first-ever “ pandemic bond ” the same year .
Moreover , Fauci also helped the GPMB write its first annual report that pronounced the drills , simulation , and release of at least one “ lethal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appears Fauci helped initiate the release of the novel coronavirus , unleashing pandemic paranoia and now , fanning new fears about the coming “ second wave , ” while insisting that only a COVID vaccine will allow society to “ return to normal.
” He did everything he could to kick the inexpensive hydroxychloroquine to the curb while promoting the ultra-expensive Remdesivir as a temporary fix until a vaccine becomes available .
Fauci further spent a lot of political capital contradicting President Trump—and himself—nearly every day over several weeks .
And the NIAID @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go-to source for trusted information on the virus .
Right .
Dr. Fauci ’ s recent Congressional testimony on the coronavirus was a master class in how to provide politicians and mainstream media with fodder they wanted to hear .
He deftly avoided giving any firm answers on titers , how long they might last , “ neutralizing antibodies , ” and other sleights of the tongue .
How is that possible ?
For a half-century , his career focused on infectious diseases and the pursuit of vaccines to prevent them .
More @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know more – a lot more – about this particular outbreak ?
• He was involved in the 2003 SARS outbreak .
Ditto the MERS epidemic in the Middle-East in 2012 .
• He sat at the decision-making table on how to “ plan and prepare ” for coronavirus .
He was there for the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa .
• And in 2016 , he famously shilled the Zika threat in a nauseating roadshow with then CDC Director , of fame , that ran from March to the November Sunday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , featured Fauci and Frieden pitching the fear of a Zika pandemic .
At the same time , the CDC director showed the CBS journalists a tour of a pandemic preparedness warehouse in case the “ big one ” hit .
We ’ re six months into this pandemic and we have only witnessed gross incompetence by the CDC , corruption with coronavirus data and testing , and a deliberate effort to ban all natural remedies that would boost people ’ s immune systems , such as exercise , high dose vitamin C @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ozone , vitamin D and sunshine and more .
Isn ’ t that what the CDC , Fauci and Bill Gates have been trying to sell with vaccines ?
Never doubt that Dr. Fauci comes as a politically machined scientist who protects U.S. health agencies over the well-being of the American people and even over the office of the president .
Be not deceived : There is no one more informed about coronavirus and epidemics than Dr. Anthony Fauci .
He even states as much with a smug know-it-all smirk .
The GPMB @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Who of international socialist politicians and leaders .
The former prime minister of Norway , Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland of Agenda 21 fame , is co-chair alongside many players responsible for the current global catastrophe .
Three of the six GPMB board members include Dr. Anthony Fauci ; Dr. Chris Elias , president of the Global Development Program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ; and Dr. George Fu Gao , the director-general at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention .
Dr. Gao is a member of the Chinese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just those three board members , many questions arise : • Should the United States be sharing virus intelligence with the CCP while in the middle of a new economic cold war ?
• Should we be collaborating with a communist-led country that has trampled human rights , has broken its 50-year treaty with Hong Kong three decades early , and has updated its 1999 doctrine , in which riots , pandemics , and economic warfare are fair game ?
• Has the U.S. offshored its national security policymaking regarding biothreats and foreign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foundation ?
• What is a director of any U.S. health agency sitting on a global pandemic planning board at the World Health Organization ?
• Why is Dr. Fauci allowed to share state , perhaps classified , information with an executive at the Gates Foundation and the director of the Chinese CDC ?
Two other sticky issues are known facts : Fauci was part of the leadership council to the Gates Foundation , from 2003–2010 and he provided funding to the Wuhan Lab for “ gain-of-function ” research and development last decade @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is what did Fauci know , and when .
Since board members at a company , non-profit , NGO , or government agency would be aware of the contents of their entity ’ s annual report , it ’ s safe to say that Dr. Fauci knew about the UN ’ s deliberate release of a “ lethal respiratory pathogen.
” The next question becomes : Did the WHO-GPMB already participate in the live virus release ?
If so , would Dr. Fauci be exposed to liability ?
And was he involved in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leading to COVID19 ?
Three salient facts are clear about Fauci and the WHO ’ s involvement with COVID19 : • Dr. Anthony Fauci sat on the board of GPMB .
• He was knowledgeable of the contents of its first annual report , “ A World at Risk.
” • The UN-WHO planned to release a live pathogen for a drill and participated in Event 201 simulation exercise , along with China ’ s Dr. Gao , Rear Admiral Stephen Redd of the CDC , among other international preparedness experts .
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be ordered immediately by the Trump Administration .
It must include an in-depth look into the WHO ’ s GPMB .
It must interview Dr. Elias from the Gates Foundation .
It must learn what information Dr. Fauci shared or gave to the CCP beyond grant money for virus research .
The investigation must also determine whether the UN and WHO ’ s new pandemic spearpoint in the GPMB plans to release another virus—for a second outbreak—this fall as its annual report states on pages 10 and 39 .
When these answers and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic can be ascertained , we will know whether Anthony Fauci is a Nostradamus junior or a science fraud , and much worse .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist , covering subjects from autism , its cause and treatments , clean technology , green energy , and the BP Oil Spill , to business and Wall Street , and completed investigative reports on a wide range @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain logistics in the Construction IT space .
James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area .
He is the author of Master Manipulator : The Explosive True Story of Fraud , Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC .

By James Grundvig, Investigative Reporter, Vaxxter contributor
Michel de Nostradamus was born in Saint-Remy, South of France, in 1503. Beyond the gifts he would one day explore in astrology, he pursued an education to become a physician. After his first year at the University of Avignon, an outbreak of the plague swept through France, forcing the University to close.
Undaunted, Nostradamus opened an apothecary before attending the University of Montpellier in pursuit of a doctorate. But a second plague struck disrupting his plan; the plague also killed his first wife and two children. During the outbreak, he joined city doctors to fight against and contain the plague. They succeeded.
Nostradamus remarried, engendered six children, and wrote an almanac. Well received, he developed his ability as a seer, with a mix of astrology and biblical end-times visions, to become the world’s most famous prognosticator of the last one thousand years. He captured his dark revelations in The Prophecies, writing a collection of 942 quatrains.
Knowing more about his life, pursuits, interests, and experiences—a survivor of two plagues, fighting on the frontline of one outbreak—many will now see Nostradamus in a new light. It’s no wonder that his visions leaned toward doom and gloom.
By contrast, Dr. Anthony Fauci, born on Christmas Eve in 1940 in Brooklyn, New York, has lived a vastly different life. Yet, there are parallels between the two men. Both pursued a career as a physician. Both experienced two plagues during their lifetimes. In Fauci’s case, he was thrust into the epicenter of the 1980s AIDS/HIV epidemic when he became director of NIH’s National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease (NIAID). In spring 2020, he roamed center stage of the COVID19 pandemic. He was featured as one of the “experts” on the White House Task Force.
Predicting the Future
The big delta between Dr. Fauci and Nostradamus boils down to the ability to predict the future. Beyond Nostradamus’ uncanny ability to predict the first two World Wars, two of the three “antichrists” in Napoleon and Hitler, the assassinations of U.S. presidents, and the 9/11 attack on the Twin Towers centuries before the events happened, Fauci predicted a pandemic in 2017, a measly three years before it took place.
Dr. Fauci shared his foresight with medical peers at a Georgetown forum when he stated, “There will be a surprise outbreak during Trump’s first term.”
Fauci’s prediction wasn’t conjured from the alignment of the stars and planets, or a passage lifted out of the Bible. No. He didn’t develop any such gift. Instead, he arrived at his foresight by steering the financing of zoonotic viruses “gain-of-function” research. In 2018, he joined the World Health Organization’s (WHO) new unit, Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) to be hands-on with pandemic planning, a full year after his “prophecy.” He likely advised or took part in the development of the World Bank’s first-ever “pandemic bond” the same year. Moreover, Fauci also helped the GPMB write its first annual report. The report pronounced the drills, simulation, and release of at least one “lethal respiratory pathogen.”
Stacking the Deck on Coronavirus Prediction
Unlike Nostradamus, it appears Fauci helped initiate the release of the novel coronavirus, unleashing pandemic paranoia and now, fanning new fears about the coming “second wave,” while insisting that only a COVID vaccine will allow society to “return to normal.” He did everything he could to kick the inexpensive hydroxychloroquine to the curb while promoting the ultra-expensive Remdesivir as a temporary fix until a vaccine becomes available. Fauci further spent a lot of political capital contradicting President Trump—and himself—nearly every day over several weeks.
And the NIAID director still presents himself as the lone go-to source for trusted information on the virus. Right.
Dr. Fauci’s recent Congressional testimony on the coronavirus was a master class in how to provide politicians and mainstream media with fodder they wanted to hear. He deftly avoided giving any firm answers on titers, how long they might last, “neutralizing antibodies,” and other sleights of the tongue.
Fauci be unfamiliar with SARS-CoV-2?
How is that possible? For a half-century, his career focused on infectious diseases and the pursuit of vaccines to prevent them. More specifically, why doesn’t Fauci know more – a lot more – about this particular outbreak?
He predicted it.
He funded research into Bat-SARs viruses.
Fauci was involved in the 2003 SARS outbreak. Ditto the MERS epidemic in the Middle-East in 2012.
He sat at the decision-making table on how to “plan and prepare” for coronavirus. He was there for the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa.
And in 2016, he famously shilled the Zika threat in a nauseating roadshow with then CDC Director Tom Frieden #MeToo 60 Minutes
We’re six months into this pandemic and we have only witnessed gross incompetence by the CDC, corruption with coronavirus data and testing, and a deliberate effort to ban all natural remedies that would boost people’s immune systems, such as exercise, high dose vitamin C, oxygen therapies such as HBOT and ozone, vitamin D and sunshine and more. Isn’t that what the CDC, Fauci and Bill Gates have been trying to sell with vaccines?
Never doubt that Dr. Fauci comes as a politically machined scientist who protects U.S. health agencies over the well-being of the American people and even over the office of the president. Be not deceived: There is no one more informed about coronavirus and epidemics than Dr. Anthony Fauci. He even states as much with a smug know-it-all smirk.
The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board
The GPMB board of directors is a Who’s Who of international socialist politicians and leaders. The former prime minister of Norway, Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland of Agenda 21 fame, is co-chair alongside many players responsible for the current global catastrophe.
Three of the six GPMB board members include Dr. Anthony Fauci; Dr. Chris Elias, president of the Global Development Program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; and Dr. George Fu Gao, the director-general at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Gao is a member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Given just those three board members, many questions arise:
Should the United States be sharing virus intelligence with the CCP while in the middle of a new economic cold war?
Should we be collaborating with a communist-led country that has trampled human rights, has broken its 50-year treaty with Hong Kong three decades early, and has updated its 1999 “Unrestricted Warfare”
Has the U.S. offshored its national security policymaking regarding biothreats and foreign powers to organizations such as the Gates Foundation?
What is a director of any U.S. health agency sitting on a global pandemic planning board at the World Health Organization?
Why is Dr. Fauci allowed to share state, perhaps classified, information with an executive at the Gates Foundation and the director of the Chinese CDC?
Two other sticky issues are known facts: Fauci was part of the leadership council to the Gates Foundation, from 2003–2010 and he provided funding to the Wuhan Lab for “gain-of-function” research and development last decade.
What we don’t know is what did Fauci know, and when.
Dr. Faui Knew
Since board members at a company, non-profit, NGO, or government agency would be aware of the contents of their entity’s annual report, it’s safe to say that Dr. Fauci knew about the UN’s deliberate release of a “lethal respiratory pathogen.”
The next question becomes: Did the WHO-GPMB already participate in the live virus release? If so, would Dr. Fauci be exposed to liability? And was he involved in the planning stages of a pathogen release leading to COVID19?
Three salient facts are clear about Fauci and the WHO’s involvement with COVID19:
Dr. Anthony Fauci sat on the board of GPMB. He was knowledgeable of the contents of its first annual report, “A World at Risk.” The UN-WHO planned to release a live pathogen for a drill and participated in Event 201 simulation exercise, along with China’s Dr. Gao, Rear Admiral Stephen Redd of the CDC, among other international preparedness experts.
A full probe into the COVID-19 outbreak must be ordered immediately by the Trump Administration. It must include an in-depth look into the WHO’s GPMB. It must interview Dr. Elias from the Gates Foundation. It must learn what information Dr. Fauci shared or gave to the CCP beyond grant money for virus research. The investigation must also determine whether the UN and WHO’s new pandemic spearpoint in the GPMB plans to release another virus—for a second outbreak—this fall as its annual report states on pages 10 and 39.
When these answers and more information into the planning of this pandemic can be ascertained, we will know whether Anthony Fauci is a Nostradamus junior or a science fraud, and much worse.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist, covering subjects from autism, its cause and treatments, clean technology, green energy, and the BP Oil Spill, to business and Wall Street, and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics since 2005. He is the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain logistics in the Construction IT space. James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area. He is the author of Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC.


vaxxter--2020-07-09--Which Pandemic Assumptions are YOU accepting as Facts?

I wasn ’ t sure how to start this blog about assumptions that are being accepted as fact during the COVID-19 pandemic .
Then I read an article by Denis G. Rancourt entitled , “ Masks Don ’ t Work : A review of science relevant to COVID-19 social policy.
” That article compelled me to order his book called Hierarchy and Free Expression in the Fight Against Racism .
Here is what he said about how we are “ engineered ” to accept and believe many basic assumptions about our health and well-being : This entrenched dominance hierarchy is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ still in the womb , and the programming runs deep .
Pregnant women are told they must have ultrasounds because their babies might be defective .
Some are told they need amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling to uncover other types of defects .
Pregnant women are routinely given a large glucose load that most would never normally ingest to see if they have gestational diabetes .
The establishment assumes that a significant enough percentage will have faulty metabolism that they must all be tested in this unnatural way .
Indeed , in many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problem it is supposed to detect .
But that is not enough .
Expecting women are also told that they must receive influenza and Dtap vaccines or their babies might die .
They are told that these vaccines can improve the health of their babies… a dangerous mega-lie if ever I heard one .
Programming and engineering with similar intentions apply to labor and delivery and the immediate neonatal period .
Think about what we do to the unborn and the newly born : artificial rupture of membranes , Pitocin induction , invasive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all women who have tested positive for Group B streptococcus , vitamin K shot , antibiotic eye drops ( in case mother has an undiagnosed case of gonorrhea or chlamydia , even if the relevant tests have been negative ) , newborn antibacterial baths , circumcision , hepatitis B vaccine , formula supplementation of the newborn .
Mothers are given the presumption that their babies enter the world with numerous things are wrong with them and that the Medical System is here to protect them , indeed to save their lives , with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it any wonder that many have no internal compass for guidance on how to take care of ourselves .
This profound and engineered lack of confidence in our own ability to be healthy is instilled deep within us .
We are literally born with it .
If we are both within the conventional system , we are stripped of our natural birthright and self-confidence about intrinsic robust health .
So now , in the midst of a pandemic , it ’ s not a surprise that so many are jumping on the bandwagon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distancing , contact tracing , antiviral drugs , and vaccines .
These measures are based on the axiomatic truths to which Rancourt refers , assumptions that are “ grandfathered in ” without questioning .
These assumptions form the basis for how we think and react in this time of crisis ( or should I say , engineered crisis ? )
.
So what are some of the assumptions that have been accepted with out questioning ?
Premise # 1 .
Masks prevent the spread of the virus so we must all be good @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refuse , we are being selfish and inconsiderate of others .
It is astonishing to see the number of people walking around in masks , even in places where they have not been mandated , simply because authority figures have told them that they must wear them .
I have even seen nonsensical suggestions that masks should be worn when having sex .
Rancourt reviewed the science on the utility of masks in stopping the spread of viral illnesses and the consensus is that they are ineffective in his above-mentioned article .
Masks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pore size of the paper or fabric from which the masks are made .
Most masks also have major gaps around the edges , which would render them ineffective even if the pore size could retain viruses .
Additionally , masks are causing problems by lowering the blood ’ s oxygen saturation level and by elevating blood CO2 levels .
Here is a quote from a 2005 article documenting this and more : Masks are psychologically damaging as well .
When our faces are covered .
a major part of our humanity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ express and receive/interpret emotions .
Feelings of joy , love , anger , fear , and sadness will be dampened and possibly eventually lost altogether if widespread masking continues .
Up to 93 % of our communication is non-verbal .
Recommendations to mask are not based on science and can therefore only be attributed to social engineering .
Premise # 2 .
Social distancing prevents the spread of the virus and will limit mortality .
Social distancing , the order to stay 6 feet apart from another person is another nonsensical recommendation that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we really supposed to believe that viruses can travel 6 feet from one person to another , but not 6 feet and 1 inch ?
Are we supposed to live in a world with stickers on the floor telling us where to stand and arrows on store floors telling us which direction to go down the aisles ?
As far as I can tell , this programming is supposed to get us used to relinquishing our freedoms : Stand where you are told and follow directions simply because they come from an authority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or have any basis in science .
It is sad to see so many people accept that their immune systems are so defective that standing close to another person can bring about their demise .
Premise # 3 .
We will remain in lockdown until a vaccine or is widely available .
We hear this story daily from mainstream media and it is a story that is rarely questioned .
The idea that the only way out of this pandemic is a vaccine is based on two assumptions : 1 .
Vaccines are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Fortunately , the number of vaccine skeptics has hugely increased .
Even some in the mainstream are questioning the wisdom of the “ warp speed ” with which the coronavirus vaccines are being developed , but this does receive much airtime .
Vaccines are accepted as the gold standard and best solution to stop the pandemic .
Antiviral drugs such as Remdisivir also come with a host of problems including a list of side effects that include alteration of the human genome and the possibility that it can cause resistant organisms .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ interest surrounding it and its hefty projected price of about $ 1,000 per pill .
It is frustrating that we hear no attention being paid to health-promoting measures such as eating healthy , getting adequate sleep , lowering stress with exercise and taking commonsense supplements such as vitamin C , vitamin D , vitamin A , zinc , medicinal mushrooms , turmeric , and colloidal silver .
Premise # 4 .
COVID-19 is caused by a virus and viruses are our enemies .
This is the most controversial assumption that we can question @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is that a coronavirus , whether naturally occurring or engineered , is causing us to be sick and any acute illness is a bad thing .
Some have questioned if there is even a virus .
Dr. Andrew Kaufman has proposed that particles seen under electron microscopy that are called viruses are actually exosomes , produced by cells when exposed to various stressors including radiation , infections , toxins , emotional stress and more .
Kaufman states that he has analyzed the research on COVID-19 and that a definitive pathogen has not been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by a high-profile European pathologist who has reported that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent .
Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization ( WHO ) a “ criminal medical organization ” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic .
Another doctor , Dr. Zach Bush , has stated that viruses perform a beneficial function .
They assist in human evolution and help humans advance as a species .
Viruses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; if the detoxification process overwhelms the system .
even death is a way to evolve .
Instead of supporting viral pathology , we demonize the viral “ attack.
” It is a battle that ultimately can not be won because we are surrounded by millions of viral particles at all times .
In order to live in harmony in the world , we need to promote health and balance both in ourselves and the world .
What assumptions do you accept as fact ?
What assumptions do you challenge ?
The answers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of our future , so ponder each premise carefully .
Make wise decisions based on how you want to live the next few years of your life .
Do you want a life of ongoing fear , lockdown , and restrictions or a life of freedom and an ability to live a vibrant existence ?
My hope is for the latter .

by Janet Levatin, MD, holistic pediatrician
I wasn’t sure how to start this blog about assumptions that are being accepted as fact during the COVID-19 pandemic. Then I read an article by Denis G. Rancourt entitled, “Masks Don’t Work: A review of science relevant to COVID-19 social policy.” That article compelled me to order his book called Hierarchy and Free Expression in the Fight Against Racism.
Here is what he said about how we are “engineered” to accept and believe many basic assumptions about our health and well-being:
Broad proscriptions [condemnation] presented as deriving from what are alleged to be axiomatic truths (i.e., truths that need not be demonstrated) are a common social engineering device. Active state and corporate support for these campaigns are typically applied to the most dangerous truths about the system.”
He continues,
“… the mega-lie engineered and maintained by establishment medicine… is at the heart of how a dominance hierarchy is anchored on a primal level on our intrinsic human biology. Things are not as they appear. Even the things we believe about ourselves and our bodies are mostly wrong.”
Dominance Starts in the Womb
This entrenched dominance hierarchy is imposed upon us while we are still in the womb. The programming runs deep. Pregnant women are told they must have ultrasounds because their babies might be defective. Some are told they need amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling to uncover other types of defects. If various defects are discovered, abortion is often recommended, even pushed. Pregnant women are routinely given a large glucose load that most would never normally ingest. The purpose of the dose is to see if they have gestational diabetes. The establishment assumes that a significant percentage will have faulty metabolism and that they must all be tested to unmakes it in this unnatural way. Indeed, in many women, the test can induce the problem it is supposed to detect.
But that is not enough. Expecting women are also told that they must receive influenza and Tdap vaccines or their babies might die. They are told that these vaccines can improve the health of their babies… a dangerous mega-lie if ever I heard one.
Programming and engineering with similar intentions apply to labor and delivery and the immediate neonatal period. Think about what we do to women in labor and the newly born: artificial rupture of membranes, Pitocin induction, invasive fetal monitoring, antibiotics during labor for all women who have tested positive for Group B streptococcus, vitamin K shot, antibiotic eye drops (in case mother has an undiagnosed case of gonorrhea or chlamydia, even if the relevant diagnostic tests have been negative), newborn antibacterial baths, circumcision, hepatitis B vaccine, formula supplementation of the newborn.
Mothers are programmed with the presumption that their babies enter the world with numerous things wrong with them. They are told, and often assume, the Medical System is here to protect them, indeed to save their lives, with invasive routine procedures and drugs.
Born Without a Compass
Is it any wonder that many or us have no internal compass for guidance on how to take care of ourselves. This profound. engineered lack of confidence in our own ability to be healthy is instilled deep within us. We are literally born with it. If we are born within the conventional system, we are stripped of our natural birthright of self-confidence in our intrinsic robust health and wellness.
So now, in the midst of a pandemic, it’s not a surprise that so many are jumping on the bandwagon of masking and anxiously awaiting the vaccine panacea. Many are obsessive over sanitizing, social distancing, contact tracing, antiviral drugs, and the promise of vaccines. These measures are based on the axiomatic truths to which Rancourt refers, assumptions that are “grandfathered in” without being questioned. These assumptions form the basis for how we think and react in this time of crisis (or should I say, engineered crisis?).
So what are some of the assumptions that have been accepted without questioning?
Pandemic Assumptions
Premise #1
Masks prevent the spread of the virus so we must all be good citizens and wear them. If we refuse, we are being selfish and inconsiderate of others.
It is astonishing to see the number of people walking around in masks. Masks are being worn even in places where they haven’t been “mandated.” The only reason is that authority figures have told people they must wear them. I have even seen nonsensical suggestions that masks should be worn when having sex.
In his above-mentioned article, Rancourt reviewed the science on the utility of masks in stopping the spread of viral illnesses and the consensus is that they are ineffective. Masks do not work to stop viruses because viruses are smaller than the pore size of the paper or fabric from which the masks are made. Most masks also have major gaps around the edges. These gaps would render them ineffective even if the pore size could retain viruses.
Dangers of Masks
Additionally, masks can cause problems by lowering the blood’s oxygen saturation level and by elevating blood CO2 levels. Here is a quote from a 2005 article documenting this and more:
Wearing N95 masks results in hypooxygenemia [low blood oxygen] and hypercapnia [increased carbon dioxide] which reduce working efficiency and the ability to make correct decision (sic). Medical staff are at increased risk of getting ‘Severe acute respiratory syndrome’ (SARS), and wearing N95 masks is highly recommended by experts worldwide. However, dizziness, headache, and short of breath (sic) are commonly experienced by the medical staff wearing N95 masks. The ability to make correct decision may be hampered, too.”
Masks are psychologically damaging as well. When our faces are covered, a major part of our humanity is hidden, including our ability to express and receive/interpret emotions. Feelings of joy, love, anger, fear, and sadness will be dampened and possibly eventually lost altogether if widespread masking continues. Up to 93% of our communication is non-verbal. Since recommendations to mask are not based on science they can therefore only be attributed to social engineering. Maybe “they” want us to lose our humanity.
Premise #2
Social distancing prevents the spread of the virus and will limit mortality.
Social distancing, the order to stay 6 feet apart from other people, is another nonsensical recommendation that has no basis in science. Are we really supposed to believe that viruses can travel 5 feet-11 inches from one person to another, but not 6 feet? From now on are we supposed to live in a world with stickers on the floor telling us where to stand and arrows on store floors telling us which direction to go down the aisles? As far as I can tell, this programming is supposed to get us used to relinquishing our freedoms: Stand where you are told and follow directions simply because they come from an authority figure, not because they make sense or have any basis in science. It is sad to see so many people apparently accepting that their immune systems are so defective that standing close to another person can bring about their demise.
Premise #3
We will remain in lockdown until a vaccine or is widely available.
We hear this story daily from mainstream media and it is a story that is rarely questioned. The idea that the only way out of this pandemic is a vaccine is based on two assumptions: 1. Vaccines are safe. 2. Vaccines are effective. They are neither, and there is plenty of evidence to back this assertion.
Fortunately the number of vaccine skeptics has increased greatly. Even some in the mainstream are questioning the wisdom of the “warp speed” with which the coronavirus vaccines are being developed, but this does receive much airtime. Vaccines are accepted as the gold standard and best solution to stop the pandemic, and infectious ailments in general.
Antiviral drugs such as Remdesivir also come with a host of problems including a list of side effects that include alteration of the human genome, and the possibility that it can cause resistant organisms. Not to mention the financial conflicts of interest surrounding it and its hefty projected price of about $1,000 per pill.
It is frustrating that we hear no attention being paid to health-promoting measures such as eating healthy, getting adequate sleep, lowering stress, exercising, and taking commonsense supplements such as vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin A, zinc, medicinal mushrooms, and colloidal silver.
Premise #4
COVID-19 is caused by a virus and viruses are our enemies.
This is the most controversial assumption that we can question. The whole basis for the pandemic is that a coronavirus, whether naturally occurring or engineered, is causing us to be sick… and any acute illness is a bad thing.
Some have questioned if there is even a virus. Dr. Andrew Kaufman has proposed that the particles seen under electron microscopy that are called viruses are actually exosomes, and that the are produced by our own cells when we are exposed to various stressors including radiation, infections, toxins, emotional stress and more. Kaufman states that he has analyzed the research on COVID-19 and that a definitive pathogen has not been identified.
Similar findings have been confirmed by a high-profile European pathologist who has reported that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent. Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.
Another doctor, Dr. Zach Bush, has stated that viruses perform a beneficial function. They assist in human evolution and help humans advance as a species. Viruses can help us detox. Viruses can help us take that next evolutionary step. Instead of supporting viral “pathology,” however, we demonize the viral “attack.” It is a battle that ultimately cannot be won because we are surrounded by millions of viral particles at all times. In order to live in harmony in the world, we need to promote health and balance both in ourselves and the world.
What Will You Accept?
What assumptions do you accept as fact? And what assumptions do you challenge? The answers to these questions will be the determinants of our future, so ponder each premise carefully. Make wise decisions based on how you want to live the next few years of your life. Do you want a life of ongoing fear, lockdown, and restrictions? Or do you want a life of freedom and an ability to live a vibrant existence? My hope is for the latter.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. Janet Levatin graduated from George Washington University in 1982, and completed a pediatric residency at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of NJ. From 1986 to 2011 she had a private practice in Boston, MA, where she offered various holistic options for children and adults. In 2011 she moved to northeast Ohio and joined Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center, where she offers a variety of programs for children and adults including homeopathy, nutritional detox, cardiovascular wellness, breast health and herbs. Dr. Janet is passionate about prevention and using natural solutions for health problems whenever possible. She has spoken out about the toxicity of pharmaceuticals, including vaccines, for many years and is a strong supporter for freedom of choice in medical decision making.
Photo credit: ID 161068471 © Ssstocker | Dreamstime.com


vaxxter--2020-07-14--Covid-19 Tyranny and Economic Carnage in New Zealand

New Zealand is heading for tyranny and economic misery as authorities engage the military to run quarantines .
The seriousness of the Covid-19 virus which killed only 22 continues to be overstated .
Strict border controls continue and compassionate exceptions to quarantine rules will get tighter as the South Pacific Nation ’ s left collision Government deals with two Covid-19 positives slipping through undetected .
New Zealand was lauded around the world for eliminating Covid-19 after being Covid-19 free for 24 days .
The two new cases prompted criticism from around the world .
There are warnings that the country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rest of the world for years to come if it wants to retain its coveted elimination status .
The New Zealand economy is showing signs of hemorrhaging and more job losses and business closures are predicted as Government wage subsidies end later this year .
So far NZ $ 62.1 billion is allocated for Covid-19 relief .
New Zealand , with a population of about 5 million , has an annual GDP of about NZ $ 333 billion in a good year .
It is expected that 230,000 employers will still be receiving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of writing .
Border closures have killed the picturesque adventure country ’ s tourism industry worth NZ $ 16.2 billion .
The Covid-19 crisis lockdown resulted in an estimated 39 % reduction in business at the strictest level and 24 % at the next severe level .
Registered unemployment is predicted to rise from 4 % in January to 9 % by November – the highest it has been in almost 30 years and that figure does not include people who do not qualify for the country ’ s job seeker benefit .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ extra 43,047 people registered with welfare services on top of the 111,000 registered in January .
A John Hopkins University study from 1940 to 1974 showed that for every 1.4 % rise in unemployment there is an increase in mortality of 2.7 % .
That will lead to many more deaths than Covid-19 – in fact , 135,000 extra deaths , not just the actual 22 or projected 80,000 .
Despite the economic fallout and coming further pain the public mostly seems on board with government actions , not realizing the layer of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and “ let ’ s be kind ” veneer .
It appears the New Zealand Government is hopeful the public will keep falling into line but has a concerning back-up plan should resistance appear .
A leaked email reveals Minister Jacinda Adern ’ s office instructing ministers to not explain anything to the media as the public was on board and things had gone well .
However , plan B is has been released .
The military , who according to a former military man , is in training for public unrest in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the border quarantine enforcement in the wake of the two COVID cases which slipped through .
And the military is being equipped with updated hardware including maritime patrol aircraft and new armored vehicles , according to Defence Minister Ron Mark who defended questions about whether the spending was wise in the current Covid-19 economy .
If that were not enough , the Government still has the new controversial Covid-19 Health Response Bill to fall back on which gives police sweeping powers to potentially enter homes without warrants while enforcing Covid-19 alert level rules @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will give the Government powers to remove content it deems inappropriate , is also currently making its way into law .
It is classified as urgent .
New Zealanders who are enjoying more freedom and rejoicing in the seeming eradication of Covid-19 are now being told by the New Zealand leftish media that it is normal to experience anxiety about the two new cases .
It appears there is a suggestion being made that they should be fearful and we can not live with any cases of Covid-19 in New Zealand at all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ After all 22 people died of the ghastly virus which needs to be stamped out at all costs .
Yes , that is right .
New Zealand had a death rate of between 4 and 5 people per million of population and those who sadly died were all over the age of 60 , mostly with underlying health conditions and many in rest homes .
Professor Michael Levitt , a globally renowned biophysicist and chemist and winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize in Chemistry , says that a virus similar to influenza or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Covid-19 ) would see about 500 deaths per million as a reasonable rate .
So New Zealand could have had 100 times more deaths and still be on track !
Professor Levitt expects that a country that has not had that death rate will be more likely to experience a second wave .
In that case , the New Zealand Government will consider itself justified in keeping borders strictly monitored unless it admits the lockdown was unnecessary to start with .
One has to ask how long keeping strict border control will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world and whose lifeblood has been in tourism and export connections not so easily made over Zoom .
Back in March , the irony of the situation appeared to escape most New Zealanders .
The country was committing economic suicide to supposedly save people who were likely to die soon of other conditions or during the next influenza season .
It became clear very early on that anyone with a robust immune system or under the age of 60 was not in danger .
Could the people who were the most at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who could keep the economy going ?
Sadly , the public was not given this alternative option .
The Government was concerned that hospitals would be overrun .
People talked about imagining people being triaged outside big city hospitals waiting for bed space after Prime Minister Jacinda Adern repeated outlandish predictions that as many as 80,000 New Zealanders could die if the country did not lockdown .
That did not happen and the hospitals were not overrun .
The total actual number of confirmed cases in New Zealand at the time of writing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There were 350 probable cases .
The WHO declaration of a pandemic and the New Zealand Government rhetoric scared people into shutting their businesses and putting the country ’ s economic and mental health at risk .
Even the opposition party agreed a lockdown was necessary , only pressing the Government to ease restrictions when it became clear the “ curve had been flattened ” and the economic cost was mounting .
A few astute people wrote blogs in opposition warning of the social consequences and soon trolls appeared in the comments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any dissent from the official narrative , with proportionately few liking posts questioning the approach .
And many were horrified at any “ conspiracy theory ( or fact ) ” which was suggested , either ignoring or calling it out and saying not to scare people and to trust the officials and experts .
This trend is increasingly disturbing to a critical thinker .
The way in which the public has acquiesced to the lockdown and the information provided , not to mention the introduction of invasive and controlling legislation during lockdown is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Zealanders so complacent and trusting of politicians , officials , and so-called “ experts ” ?
This is one of the most distressing elements of the whole saga .
The media repeats the official narrative like a Government PR arm – avoiding asking the hard questions and challenging the course of action .
There have been protests but not about the lockdown or legislation .
They were in support of the Black Lives Matter after the US police killing of George Floyd .
Ironically the indigenous people of New Zealand- the Maori – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their worldwide counterparts .
Watching US citizens protest during the lockdowns , mostly on social media rather than mainstream outlets who seemed to ignore it , was a tonic but amplified the complacency in New Zealand .
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny , the founder of Courses4Mastery.com and TenpennyIMC.com in Ohio , United States , says people are beginning to see the huge scam of the Covid-19 pandemic .
With a global death rate of 1.4 % it is less fatal than a severe flu season , she says .
( See Vaxxter article on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ writing , there is an encouraging sign that perhaps a groundswell of New Zealanders are starting to wake up .
A new political party called The New Zealand Public Party is emerging just in time for the country ’ s September elections .
In just a matter of days , the party has gained momentum not seen before in New Zealand politics , according to leader Billy Te Kahika .
The party is anti-compulsory vaccines , against United Nations 2030 agenda , and wants to fight for freedom and true democracy .
One @ @ @ @ @ @ @ late .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Rachael Parsons is a critical thinker and “ real news ” junkie from Down Under .
She wrote for a New Zealand daily newspaper for eight years and also has a degree in teaching and learning , and has extensive experience in business .

By Rachel Parsons, Vaxxter contributor
New Zealand is heading for tyranny and economic misery as authorities engage the military to run quarantines. The seriousness of the Covid-19 virus which killed only 22 continues to be overstated. Strict border controls continue and compassionate exceptions to quarantine rules will get tighter as the South Pacific Nation’s left collision Government deals with two Covid-19 positives slipping through undetected. New Zealand was lauded around the world for eliminating Covid-19 after being Covid-19 free for 24 days. The two new cases prompted criticism from around the world. There are warnings that the country might have to stay closed to the rest of the world for years to come if it wants to retain its coveted elimination status.
Economic carnage
The New Zealand economy is showing signs of hemorrhaging and more job losses and business closures are predicted as Government wage subsidies end later this year. So far NZ$62.1 billion is allocated for Covid-19 relief. New Zealand, with a population of about 5 million, has an annual GDP of about NZ$333 billion in a good year. It is expected that 230,000 employers will still be receiving the government wage subsidy at the time of writing. Border closures have killed the picturesque adventure country’s tourism industry worth NZ$16.2 billion. The Covid-19 crisis lockdown resulted in an estimated 39% reduction in business at the strictest level and 24% at the next severe level. Registered unemployment is predicted to rise from 4% in January to 9% by November – the highest it has been in almost 30 years and that figure does not include people who do not qualify for the country’s job seeker benefit. As of mid-June, there were an extra 43,047 people registered with welfare services on top of the 111,000 registered in January. A John Hopkins University study from 1940 to 1974 showed that for every 1.4% rise in unemployment there is an increase in mortality of 2.7%. That will lead to many more deaths than Covid-19 – in fact, 135,000 extra deaths, not just the actual 22 or projected 80,000.
Public Falling Into Line but…
Despite the economic fallout and coming further pain the public mostly seems on board with government actions, not realizing the layer of tyranny being built beneath the public relations and “let’s be kind” veneer. It appears the New Zealand Government is hopeful the public will keep falling into line but has a concerning back-up plan should resistance appear.
A leaked email reveals Minister Jacinda Adern’s office instructing ministers to not explain anything to the media as the public was on board and things had gone well.
However, plan B is has been released.
The military, who according to a former military man, is in training for public unrest in New Zealand, is now taking over the border quarantine enforcement in the wake of the two COVID cases which slipped through. And the military is being equipped with updated hardware including maritime patrol aircraft and new armored vehicles, according to Defence Minister Ron Mark who defended questions about whether the spending was wise in the current Covid-19 economy.
If that were not enough, the Government still has the new controversial Covid-19 Health Response Bill to fall back on which gives police sweeping powers to potentially enter homes without warrants while enforcing Covid-19 alert level rules. An internet censorship bill, which will give the Government powers to remove content it deems inappropriate, is also currently making its way into law. It is classified as urgent.
Authorities Hell-Bent on Pushing Fear
New Zealanders who are enjoying more freedom and rejoicing in the seeming eradication of Covid-19 are now being told by the New Zealand leftish media that it is normal to experience anxiety about the two new cases. It appears there is a suggestion being made that they should be fearful and we cannot live with any cases of Covid-19 in New Zealand at all. It is far too dangerous. After all 22 people died of the ghastly virus which needs to be stamped out at all costs. Yes, that is right. New Zealand had a death rate of between 4 and 5 people per million of population and those who sadly died were all over the age of 60, mostly with underlying health conditions and many in rest homes.
Professor Michael Levitt, a globally renowned biophysicist and chemist and winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, says that a virus similar to influenza or a bit worse (how he classifies Covid-19) would see about 500 deaths per million as a reasonable rate. So New Zealand could have had 100 times more deaths and still be on track! Professor Levitt expects that a country that has not had that death rate will be more likely to experience a second wave. In that case, the New Zealand Government will consider itself justified in keeping borders strictly monitored unless it admits the lockdown was unnecessary to start with. One has to ask how long keeping strict border control will be viable for a country so isolated from the world and whose lifeblood has been in tourism and export connections not so easily made over Zoom.
Public scaremongering
Back in March, the irony of the situation appeared to escape most New Zealanders. The country was committing economic suicide to supposedly save people who were likely to die soon of other conditions or during the next influenza season. It became clear very early on that anyone with a robust immune system or under the age of 60 was not in danger. Could the people who were the most at risk be quarantined rather than the well who could keep the economy going?
Sadly, the public was not given this alternative option. The Government was concerned that hospitals would be overrun. People talked about imagining people being triaged outside big city hospitals waiting for bed space after Prime Minister Jacinda Adern repeated outlandish predictions that as many as 80,000 New Zealanders could die if the country did not lockdown. That did not happen and the hospitals were not overrun. The total actual number of confirmed cases in New Zealand at the time of writing was 1156 including the two new infections. There were 350 probable cases.
Lack of questioning
The WHO declaration of a pandemic and the New Zealand Government rhetoric scared people into shutting their businesses and putting the country’s economic and mental health at risk. Even the opposition party agreed a lockdown was necessary, only pressing the Government to ease restrictions when it became clear the “curve had been flattened” and the economic cost was mounting.
A few astute people wrote blogs in opposition warning of the social consequences and soon trolls appeared in the comments. New Zealanders seemed wary of supporting any dissent from the official narrative, with proportionately few liking posts questioning the approach. And many were horrified at any “conspiracy theory (or fact)” which was suggested, either ignoring or calling it out and saying not to scare people and to trust the officials and experts.
This trend is increasingly disturbing to a critical thinker. The way in which the public has acquiesced to the lockdown and the information provided, not to mention the introduction of invasive and controlling legislation during lockdown is also of concern. Why are New Zealanders so complacent and trusting of politicians, officials, and so-called “experts”? This is one of the most distressing elements of the whole saga. The media repeats the official narrative like a Government PR arm – avoiding asking the hard questions and challenging the course of action.
A Groundswell of Resistance is Rising
There have been protests but not about the lockdown or legislation. They were in support of the Black Lives Matter after the US police killing of George Floyd. Ironically the indigenous people of New Zealand- the Maori – are treated much better than many of their worldwide counterparts. Watching US citizens protest during the lockdowns, mostly on social media rather than mainstream outlets who seemed to ignore it, was a tonic but amplified the complacency in New Zealand.
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, the founder of Courses4Mastery.com and TenpennyIMC.com in Ohio, United States, says people are beginning to see the huge scam of the Covid-19 pandemic. With a global death rate of 1.4% it is less fatal than a severe flu season, she says. (See Vaxxter article on testing).
At the time of writing, there is an encouraging sign that perhaps a groundswell of New Zealanders are starting to wake up. A new political party called The New Zealand Public Party is emerging just in time for the country’s September elections. In just a matter of days, the party has gained momentum not seen before in New Zealand politics, according to leader Billy Te Kahika. The party is anti-compulsory vaccines, against United Nations 2030 agenda, and wants to fight for freedom and true democracy.
One can only hope it is not too late.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Rachael Parsons is a critical thinker and “real news” junkie from Down Under. She wrote for a New Zealand daily newspaper for eight years and also has a degree in teaching and learning, and has extensive experience in business.