vaxxter--2020-03-30--Coronavirus Pt 2: ‘Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste’, Replay

Until recently , the concept of mandatory and mass vaccination has been only a worrisome possibility .
Vaccination laws are passed and monitored at the state level , not at the federal level .
But while the country was still struggling to recover from the events of September 11 , 2001 , and the bioterrorism scares of smallpox and anthrax threats , the groundwork to make vaccines mandatory began to change in 2003 , during President George W. Bush ’ s State of the Union Address .
On that fateful night , Bush revealed the creation of Project BioShield , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ available modern , effective drugs and vaccines to protect against attack by biological and chemical weapons .
• Creation of a permanent indefinite funding authority to spur development of medical countermeasures enabling the government to purchase vaccines and other therapies as soon as experts believe that they can be made safe and effective • Conferred new authority to the NIH to speed research and development of drugs and vaccines that would counter bioterrorism threats and , • Authorized emergency “ fast track provisions for the release of treatments—drugs and vaccines—still waiting for approval @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of an emergency.
” As sweeping as those plans may seem , the legislation failed to include key provisions sought by the drug companies .
Mosty importantly , complete liability protection for all of their bioterrorism products .
During 2003 and 2004 , any bills that were introduced by both the House and the Senate attempting to secure complete liability protection for the industry were done through federal law .
In 2005 alone , 13 bills were introduced .
One such bill , The Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as S. 1873 by Senators Bill Frist ( R-TN ) and Richard Burr ( R-NC ) , its purpose , according to Burr ’ s news release , was to “ create a partnership between the government and private corporations by rapidly developing effective medical drugs and vaccines to protect the United States from deliberate , accidental , and natural incidents involving biological pathogens.
” Nicknamed BioShield II , the bill planned to give unprecedented advantages to the industry and remove or severely weaken all of the safeguards that prevented dangerous vaccines , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consumers .
S. 1873 was accelerated through the Senate Health , Education , Labor , and Pensions ( HELP ) Committee , without hearings .
Public outrage began almost immediately .
Websites , news outlets , and nationwide radio hosts were exposing the unbelievable benefits the bill would convey to the drug companies .
Dozens of activist groups representing many thousands of constituents rallied a campaign to notify Congress of their dissatisfaction with S.1873 .
Faxes , emails , and phone calls show message after message opposing the carte blanche promises drugmakers set @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against S.1873 was so strong , the possibility of its passage was bleak .
To circumvent this outrage , Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist forced the attachment of a shortened version int HR 2863 , the 2006 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill , literally at the eleventh hour .
Called Division E—Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act , Frist ’ s addendum added 40 pages to an existing 423-page bill on December 17 , 2005 at 11:20 pm , well after the House Appropriation Committee members had signed off , and most had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the PREP Act , it gave sweeping and unprecedented immunity for drug companies for emergency products .
The PREP Act provides complete immunity from liability for any loss relating to or resulting from , any product used to prevent or treat illness during a public health emergency .
The immunity applies to entities and individuals involved in the development , manufacture , testing , distribution , administration , and use of medical countermeasures described in a Declaration .
The only statutory exception to this immunity is for actions or failures to act that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we will see , even willful misconduct may not be punished .
For a full explanation of the scope of the Act , go here .
Representative Dave Obey ( D-WI ) , Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Committee made the following statement on the floor of the House on December 22 , 2005 : Passed in , Senator Frist ( a medical doctor ) handed the drug companies ( a special interest group ) more immunity than any bill that has ever been passed by Congress .
The legislation provides at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from all liability for all drugs , vaccines or biological products deemed as a “ covered countermeasure.
” • Immunity from all accountability , no matter what a drug company did wrong .
Even if the company ’ s dirty facility created a batch of contaminated vaccines that resulted in deaths or injuries to thousands of people , the drug company will remain immune from liability .
• Immunity from all liability for any product used for any public health emergency declared by the Secretary of HHS .
• Immunity from all lawsuits @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of loss will be legally prohibited from suing the drug companies ; they now have immunity from almost everything , perhaps even murder .
In simple terms , if a claim is filed by a plaintiff it can only go forward if the injured party can prove that the company performed an act of willful misconduct .
In other words , the injured party would have to prove the vaccine maker created a product that intentionally caused them harm .
Unbelievably , even then the drug company is still immune from accountability .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ people , the company will be immune from legal prosecution unless the U.S. Attorney General initiates enforcement action against the drug company in the name of the claimant .
This means the U.S. government would have to go to bat for the plaintiff against the drug company for the lawsuit to move forward .
Wasting no time , the Secretary of HHS , Alex Azar and the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response Robert P. Kadlec , MD , MTM & H , MS , issued Notice of Declaration of National Emergency and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 17 , 2020 ( Vol .
85 , No .
52 ) .
The Declaration was effective as of February 4 , 2020 .
By declaring a national emergency for the SARS-CoV-19 virus and COVID-19 , the Secretary evoked the PREP Act “ to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID–19.
” Once this new , experimental COVID-19 vaccine is deemed to be a “ covered countermeasure ” there will be no going back .
How can an experimental vaccine exist to protect from a virus that little is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a worse-case outcome for many ?
The mainstream media is conditioning people to anticipate and even beg for this vaccine .
It ’ s all part of the Plan .
The Time for Mass Vaccination in Adults Has Arrived The National Vaccine Plan ( NVP ) for adults was released in February 2010 .
It lays out the strategy to vaccinate all adults with all approved vaccines and “ any vaccine that is approved , now and in the future.
” The plan established four key goals .
Each goal has objectives and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Let ’ s look at a little closer at what the Plan has to say about Goal # 3 : • Educate and encourage individuals and healthcare professionals to promote adult vaccination programs • Leverage group influence ( faith-based groups , etc . )
to promote and demand access to adult vaccinations • Create more robust EHRs to include standing orders , reminder calls , and reminder mailings • Encourage the development of “ adult immunization champions ” in communities and across all sectors All forms of media and communication continually remind the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus that causes COVID-19 is on the way ” and “ it ’ s coming soon.
” The implied message is to anticipate it , wait for it and then , as soon as it arrives , go get your vaccine .
The listener ’ s subconscious is being prepared to demand to be vaccinated .
What Can You Do To Stop Mass Vaccination I view most current events through the lens of history .
As I wrote in Part 1 of this series , we ’ re seeing a repeat of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ few weeks after the towers came down in NYC , the draconian Patriot Act was passed into law on October 26 , 2011 .
Now , within a few weeks of the outbreak of a coronavirus , a virus we don ’ t know much about or how long it will cause serious illness , the world has implemented draconian , stay-home “ social distancing ” rules .
Even this phrase has psychological implications .
They didn ’ t call it “ physical distancing ” but “ social distancing , ” a way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should all be coming together .
How serious is the risk from this pathogen ?
On the one hand , we hear that 80 % of patients experience a mild form of the illness , which can include a fever and pneumonia , and many of these cases require little to no medical intervention .
On the other , we hear that 200,000 to 2 million may die in the U.S. alone .
Which is it ?
Are we really so afraid of this pathogen that we ’ ve shut down the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this infection that we ’ re anticipating—even looking forward to—the development of a vaccine that will be deemed a covered countermeasure and have no liability , even if it injures or kills many and protects no one ?
Look at this chart closely ( click here to enlarge ) .This is a graphic , from 2016 , distributes the number of deaths by health risk factors throughout the entire world .
It shows what people die from WITHOUT an infection by a rogue virus .
The bottom line is most die from poor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Is it any wonder that these people have the highest risk of serious illness IF they become infected ?
Perhaps during this forced global shut own one of the most important things you can do is use the time to evaluate all the areas of your life : your physical health , your mental health and your spiritual health and relationship with God .
Clean out some closets and finish a few projects you always wished you had time to do .
Read—or write —the book that has been calling you forever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lose some weight .
Catch up on your sleep .
Play with your kids .
Reconnect with your significant other .
Perhaps God has put the entire world into Full Stop so we can meditate and reflect , taking time to course-correct toward what is really most important .
Whenever I find myself feeling anxious about the future and the uncertainties of what is going on , I focus on this verse from the Bible : Psalms 46:10 – “ Be still and know I am God.
” If you can connect with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much more optimistic , and much less anxious , about the future .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888 Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is an osteopathic medical doctor , board-certified in three specialties .
She is the founder of Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center , a medical clinic located near Cleveland , Ohio .
Her company , Courses4Mastery.com provides online education and training regarding all aspects of vaccines and vaccination .
Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than 40,000 hours documenting and exposing the problems associated with vaccines .
As an internationally known speaker and author , her many articles have been translated into at least 15 languages .
She is a frequent guest on radio and TV to share her knowledge and educate parents on why they should Just.Say.No .
to vaccines .

By Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM mass vaccination
Until recently, the concept of mandatory and mass vaccination has been only a worrisome possibility. Vaccination laws are passed and monitored at the state level, not at the federal level. But while the country was still struggling to recover from the events of September 11, 2001, and the bioterrorism scares of smallpox and anthrax threats, the groundwork to make vaccines mandatory began to change in 2003, during President George W. Bush’s State of the Union Address. On that fateful night, Bush revealed the creation of Project BioShield, a comprehensive effort to develop and make available modern, effective drugs and vaccines to protect against attack by biological and chemical weapons.
Project BioShield
Project BioShield set forth three major components:
Creation of a permanent indefinite funding authority to spur development of medical countermeasures enabling the government to purchase vaccines and other therapies as soon as experts believe that they can be made safe and effective Conferred new authority to the NIH to speed research and development of drugs and vaccines that would counter bioterrorism threats and, Authorized emergency “fast track provisions for the release of treatments—drugs and vaccines—still waiting for approval by the FDA ‘in the event of an emergency.”
As sweeping as those plans may seem, the legislation failed to include key provisions sought by the drug companies. Most importantly, complete liability protection for all of their bioterrorism products.
During 2003 and 2004, any bills that were introduced by both the House and the Senate attempting to secure complete liability protection for the industry were done through federal law. In 2005 alone, 13 bills were introduced. One such bill, The Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005, was gaining traction.
S. 1873
Introduced as S. 1873 by Senators Bill Frist (R-TN) and Richard Burr (R-NC), its purpose, according to Burr’s news release, was to “create a partnership between the government and private corporations by rapidly developing effective medical drugs and vaccines to protect the United States from deliberate, accidental, and natural incidents involving biological pathogens.”
Nicknamed BioShield II, the bill planned to give unprecedented advantages to the industry and remove or severely weaken all of the safeguards that prevented dangerous vaccines, drugs, and medical devices from reaching consumers. S. 1873 was accelerated through the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, without hearings.
Public outrage began almost immediately. Websites, news outlets, and nationwide radio hosts were exposing the unbelievable benefits the bill would convey to the drug companies. Dozens of activist groups representing many thousands of constituents rallied a campaign to notify Congress of their dissatisfaction with S.1873. Faxes, emails, and phone calls left message after message opposing the carte blanche promises drugmakers set out to receive. Because the outcry against S.1873 was so strong, the possibility of its passage was bleak.
To circumvent this outrage, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist forced the attachment of a shortened version int HR 2863, the 2006 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill, literally at the eleventh hour. Called Division E—Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, Frist’s addendum added 40 pages to an existing 423-page bill on December 17, 2005 at 11:20 pm, well after the House Appropriation Committee members had signed off, and most had gone home. Soon referred to as the PREP Act, it gave sweeping and unprecedented immunity to drug companies for emergency products.
The PREP ACT
The PREP Act provides complete immunity from liability for any loss relating to or resulting from, any product used to prevent or treat illness during a public health emergency. The immunity applies to entities and individuals involved in the development, manufacture, testing, distribution, administration, and use of medical countermeasures described in a Declaration. The only statutory exception to this immunity is for actions or failures to act that constitute “willful misconduct.” And as we will see, even willful misconduct may not be punished. For a full explanation of the scope of the Act, go here.
Representative Dave Obey (D-WI), Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Committee made the following statement on the floor of the House on December 22, 2005:
After the [Committee] finished at 6 p.m., Senator Frist (R-TN) marched over to the House side of the Capitol. He insisted 40 pages of legislation that had never been seen by Conferees be attached to the bill. Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) joined Frist’s insistence and without a vote of the Conferees, the legislation was unilaterally and arrogantly inserted into the bill. [This was] a blatantly abusive power-play by two of the most powerful men in Congress. Rep. Obey’s full rebuttal – no longer available. You can read it here: Loading... Download
Sweeping Provisions Against Americans
Passed in, Senator Frist (a medical doctor) handed the drug companies (a special interest group) more immunity than any bill that has ever been passed by Congress. The legislation provides at least four sweeping provisions:
Immunity from all liability for all drugs, vaccines or biological products deemed as a “covered countermeasure.” Immunity from all accountability, no matter what a drug company did wrong. Even if the company’s dirty facility created a batch of contaminated vaccines that resulted in deaths or injuries to thousands of people, the drug company will remain immune from liability. Immunity from all liability for any product used for any public health emergency declared by the Secretary of HHS. Immunity from all lawsuits. A person who suffers any type of loss will be legally prohibited from suing the drug companies; they now have immunity from almost everything, perhaps even murder.
In simple terms, if a claim is filed by a plaintiff it can only go forward if the injured party can prove that the company performed an act of willful misconduct. In other words, the injured party would have to prove the vaccine maker created a product that intentionally caused them harm.
Unbelievably, even then the drug company is still immune from accountability. Even if a pharmaceutical company knowingly harms people, the company will be immune from legal prosecution unless the U.S. Attorney General initiates enforcement action against the drug company in the name of the claimant. This means the U.S. government would have to go to bat for the plaintiff against the drug company for the lawsuit to move forward.
Fast Forward: COVID19
Wasting no time, the Secretary of HHS, Alex Azar and the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response Robert P. Kadlec, MD, MTM&H, MS, issued Notice of Declaration of National Emergency and published in the Federal Register on March 17, 2020 (Vol. 85, No. 52). The Declaration was effective as of February 4, 2020. By declaring a national emergency for the SARS-CoV-19 virus and COVID-19, the Secretary evoked the PREP Act “to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID–19.”
Once this new, experimental COVID-19 vaccine is deemed to be a “covered countermeasure” there will be no going back. How can an experimental vaccine exist to protect from a virus that little is known about? Can you think of a worse-case outcome for many? The mainstream media is conditioning people to anticipate and even beg for this vaccine. It’s all part of the Plan.
The Time for Mass Vaccination in Adults Has Arrived
The National Vaccine Plan (NVP) for adults was released in February 2010. It lays out the strategy to vaccinate all adults with all approved vaccines and “any vaccine that is approved, now and in the future.”
The plan established four key goals. Each goal has objectives and strategies to guide implementation through 2020:
z Goal 1: Strengthen the adult immunization infrastructure
Goal 1: Strengthen the adult immunization infrastructure a Goal 2: Improve access to adult vaccines
Goal 2: Improve access to adult vaccines b Goal 3: Increase community demand for adult immunizations
Goal 3: c Goal 4: Foster innovation in adult vaccine development and vaccination-related technologies
Let’s look at a little closer at what the Plan has to say about Goal #3:
Educate and encourage individuals and healthcare professionals to promote adult vaccination programs
Leverage group influence (faith-based groups, etc.) to promote and demand access to adult vaccinations
Create more robust EHRs to include standing orders, reminder calls, and reminder mailings
Encourage the development of “adult immunization champions” in communities and across all sectors
All forms of media and communication continually remind the general public that a “vaccine for the virus that causes COVID-19 is on the way” and “it’s coming soon.” The implied message is to anticipate it, wait for it and then, as soon as it arrives, go get your vaccine. The listener’s subconscious is being prepared to demand to be vaccinated.
What Can You Do To Stop Mass Vaccination
I view most current events through the lens of history. As I wrote in Part 1 of this series, we’re seeing a repeat of what happened after 911. Only a few weeks after the towers came down in NYC, the draconian Patriot Act was passed into law on October 26, 2011. Now, within a few weeks of the outbreak of a coronavirus, a virus we don’t know much about or how long it will cause serious illness, the world has implemented draconian, stay-home “social distancing” rules. Even this phrase has psychological implications. They didn’t call it “physical distancing” but “social distancing,” a way to separate us at a time we should all be coming together.
How serious is the risk from this pathogen? On the one hand, we hear that 80% of patients experience a mild form of the illness, which can include a fever and pneumonia, and many of these cases require little to no medical intervention. On the other, we hear that 200,000 to 2 million may die in the U.S. alone. Which is it? Are we really so afraid of this pathogen that we’ve shut down the world? Are we so afraid of contracting this infection that we’re anticipating—even looking forward to—the development of a vaccine that will be deemed a covered countermeasure and have no liability, even if it injures or kills many and protects no one?
Non-Infectious Caused Deaths
Look at this chart closely (click here to enlarge). This graphic from 2016 distributes the number of deaths by health risk factors throughout the entire world. It shows what people die from WITHOUT an infection by a rogue virus.
The bottom line is most die from poor nutrition and conditions marked by high inflammation.
Is it any wonder that these people have the highest risk of serious illness IF they become infected?
Perhaps during this forced global shut own one of the most important things you can do is use the time to evaluate all the areas of your life: your physical health, your mental health and your spiritual health and relationship with God. Clean out some closets and finish a few projects you always wished you had time to do. Read—or write —the book that has been calling you forever. Eat better. Exercise more. Lose some weight. Catch up on your sleep. Play with your kids. Reconnect with your significant other.
Perhaps God has put the entire world into Full Stop so we can meditate and reflect, taking time to course-correct toward what is really most important. Whenever I find myself feeling anxious about the future and the uncertainties of what is going on, I focus on this verse from the Bible: Psalms 46:10 – “Be still and know I am God.” If you can connect with that idea, you’ll be much more optimistic, and much less anxious, about the future.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is an osteopathic medical doctor, board-certified in three specialties. She is the founder of Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center, a medical clinic located near Cleveland, Ohio. Her company, Courses4Mastery.com provides online education and training regarding all aspects of vaccines and vaccination.
Dr. Tenpenny has invested nearly 20 years and more than 40,000 hours documenting and exposing the problems associated with vaccines. As an internationally known speaker and author, her many articles have been translated into at least 15 languages. She is a frequent guest on radio and TV to share her knowledge and educate parents on why they should Just.Say.No. to vaccines.
Photo credit:ID 142634156 © Sergeyacros | Dreamstime.com


vaxxter--2020-03-24--Coronavirus Pt 1: How Soon We Forget – Same Playbook, Different Virus

I ’ ve been sitting back , listening to and watching the crushing plan “ they ” have designed for us .
I ’ ve been viewing this fiasco through the lens of history .
I wrote this article to give you some perspective .
I couldn ’ t help but think when this COVID19 blitz started , “ How soon we forget.
” Over the last three weeks , unless you have been cloistered in a monastery in Tibet , you have been bombarded with at least 2.1 billion media mentions regarding a new form of coronavirus that has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a comparison , when Ebola was in the news last year , it received a mere 16.3 million media mentions .
The world economy has ground to a stop over the pandemic spread of coronavirus SARS-CoV2 , the proper name for the virus .
This name was chosen because the virus is genetically related to the coronavirus responsible for the SARS outbreak of 2003 .
The SARS-CoV2 virus is the cause of the coronavirus disease 2019 , or COVID-19 .
The two terms are in use interchangeably but the words are not synonyms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are named for the crown-like spikes on their surface .
There are 36 coronaviruses in the family Coronaviridae .
The viruses cause respiratory or intestinal infections in humans and some animals .
These common , mostly benign respiratory viruses were first identified in humans in the mid-1960s .
The coronaviruses that commonly infect people are : These four common human viruses cause 10–20 % of respiratory infections worldwide and are present on all continents .
Most likely , you ’ ve had exposure to , and perhaps ill from , a coronavirus infection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And you may actually have some level of natural immunity to this virus .
The first reported case of the “ mysterious flu ” was reported in November 2002 .
Scientists went into high gear and found this highly pathogenic coronavirus originating in the Guangdong province in China .
Experts were concerned because there were no previous cases in humans before .
Named SARS-CoV , for “ severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by a coronavirus , ” its spread set off panicked alerts across the globe .
The WHO issued its first global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alerts went out even though the majority of cases were mostly in Chinese province .
Ten years later a similar , highly pathogenic coronavirus called the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus ( MERS-CoV ) would emerge in Middle Eastern countries leading to severe respiratory distress syndrome in humans .
Teams of experts went to investigate the SARS outbreak .
The hysteria ramped up quickly , and within weeks , the Hong Kong Department of Health issued an unprecedented quarantine order .
And order to keep residents inside their homes .
Shortly thereafter , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ schools , cinemas , and libraries .
The closures being an attempt to stop the spread of the virus .
As reports of more cases came into Toronto , Canadian health officials warned residents to quarantine themselves , wear masks , and in some cases , just stay home .
Over the six month duration of the pandemic , 8,049 people tested positive for the virus .
The vast majority of cases occurred in China , Hong Kong , and Taiwan , with a resulting 774 deaths , or close to 10 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the fact that few people in Canada were affected ( 251 ) and even fewer died ( 43 ) , the Canadian Tourism Board estimated that the SARS epidemic cost the nation ’ s economy $ 419 million .
The Ontario health minister reported that the cost to the province ’ s health-care system , including money spent to develop special clinics and stock them with supplies to protect healthcare workers , was nearly $ 763 million .
SARS had a significant effect on the airline industry .
Singapore Airlines lost $ 6 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when SARS choked off intra- and inter-Asian travel .
Other less obvious industries that suffered during the outbreak were retail sales , hotels , and restaurants .
When translated into an absolute dollar amount , these figures imply that the global economic loss from SARS was close to $ 40 billion U.S. in 2003 .
This figure is much greater than the medical costs of treating SARS patients .
As SARS-CoV faded into obscurity in 2004 , and has never been seen again , a new pandemic was coming to the forefront .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ influenza virus , H5N1 , that was gaining the attention of the WHO and the mainstream media .
Influenza A subtypes have been designated as either mildly pathogenic , meaning they cause minimal or no disease .
Or they can be highly pathogenic , meaning their presence has been associated with widespread infection .
The antigen subtypes H5 , H7 , and H9 are the cause of all outbreaks of highly pathogenic influenza .
This has been the case since the 1980s .
A pandemic by definition is an outbreak of an infection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crossing international boundaries and usually affects a large number of people .
By those standards , the bird flu exploded onto the world stage in May 1997 through an ironically innocent setting .
A Hong Kong pre-school had set up a small petting zoo on its grounds , making a home for five chickens and eight ducks .
The children were happy to spend time with their feathered friends .
Several days after the school aviary experience , a three-year-old boy began to cough .
The illness and fever progressed rapidly , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Victoria Hospital where he was admitted with pneumonia and respiratory distress .
Six days later , he died .
Pathologists found no underlying immunodeficiency or cardiopulmonary disease that would have contributed to the boy ’ s death .
Three months later , the virus was confirmed to be avian influenza A virus with surface antigens H5N1 .
In a report published later , researchers held that this particular bird flu virus had not previously caused infection in humans .
Teams from the WHO and the CDC descended on Hong Kong to determine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bird flu virus and to assess the potential public health impact .
According to investigators , one of the chickens in the petting zoo had died several days before the child ’ s symptoms had appeared .
Postulation suggests that there was exposure to the ill bird , meaning , the virus had “ jumped species ” to infect the boy .
In the following days and weeks , officials began scrambling to determine if the virus infection had spread to those who had come in contact with the ill child .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who had been in contact with the boy , the school ’ s petting zoo , or the birds from the rural areas .
No additional cases were identified .
Then , a second case of H5N1 infection was confirmed in Hong Kong .
Then , 18 more cases appeared over the following months .
With news of the direct bird-to-human transmission , the CDC and WHO believed the next pandemic had arrived .
Again , is this sounding familiar ?
Throughout the evolving epidemic , China denied the presence of bird @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , that changed in 2005 when China reported 7 human cases with three deaths to the WHO .
All across the expansive country , millions of farmers were living in close proximity to billions of chickens , the reservoir of the H5N1 virus .
Reporting only seven H5N1 human infections seems extraordinarily low .
Many virologists around the world have questioned the relative absence of human cases , given there were 30 highly pathogenic viral outbreaks in poultry across ten provinces throughout 2005 .
China lied twice before ; is there any doubt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
In the spring of 2009 , another pandemic siren shrieked across the US and around the world .
This time , it was over a novel strain of influenza A .
With the origin and discovery of the virus in pigs from a small region in central Mexico , the outbreak became known as “ swine flu ” and the viral nomenclature was H1N1 .
The WHO quickly declared a “ public health emergency of international concern.
” By June , the WHO and the CDC stopped counting cases .
The next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outbreak as a pandemic .
About that same time , experts around the world were saying that this H1N1 swine flu virus was not aggressive enough to cause a worldwide pandemic .
They noted that the mortality rate among confirmed cases was 1.6 % in Mexico and only 0.1 % in the United States .
At press conferences , various medical experts made remarks such as , “ It is unclear if we need to use vaccines against the swine flu because the virus does not have a pandemic nature.
” Additional remarks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ needs a vaccine for an illness that so far appears mild ?
” Nonetheless , loaded with government funds , the Big Boys in vaccine manufacturing plowed ahead .
By September , Pandemrix and Arepanrix , both made by GlaxoSmithKline ( GSK ) were approved .
Focetria , made by Novartis was also approved for use the following month .
Celvapan , a whole virus vaccine made by Baxter was approved but soon withdrawn from market because it caused extremely high fevers .
All of these vaccines were fast-tracked to market with no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ subjects in the trials .
Let ’ s take a look at the ingredients* : • Pandemerix : • Adjuvant : AS03 which contains squalene ( 10.69 mg ) , polysorbate 80 ( 4.86 mg ) and alpha-tocopherol ( 11.86 mg ) • Focetia : • Adjuvant : MF59 which contains squalene ( 9.75 mg ) , polysorbate 80 ( 1.175 mg ) and sorbitan trioleate ( 1.175 mg ) • Other Ingredients : egg proteins , thimerosal ( multidose vial only ) , sodium chloride , potassium chloride , potassium dihydrogen phosphate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hexahydrate , calcium chloride dihydrate , sodium citrate , citric acid and water for injections .
[ what do all those chemicals do to human cells ? ]
*for a detailed discussion regarding vaccine ingredients , see www.VaccineU.com and the 7-part course on Problematic Ingredients .
The pandemic vaccines were very problematic .
In fact , Pandemerix was later shown to conclusively be associated with narcolepsy .
More than 1300 people who received a vaccine to prevent the flu developed narcolepsy , an incurable , debilitating condition that causes overpowering daytime sleepiness , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ response to strong emotions such as laughter or anger .
Worse , the vaccines did little to lower the death rate .
The pandemic began to taper off in November 2009 , and by August 10 , 2010 , the Director-General of the WHO , Margaret Chan , announced the end of the H1N1 pandemic .
The CDC estimates that between April 12 , 2009 to April 10 , 2010 , there were 60.8 million people infected , with 274,000 hospitalizations , and 12,469 deaths—a mortality rate of 0.02 % due to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ familiar ?
Millions infected ; low mortality rate .
No economic cataclysmic events , no “ social distancing ” , no masks , no community lockdowns .
A third , highly pathogenic virus emerged out of Wuhan , China in December 2019 .
SARS-CoV2 , the novel coronavirus , has rapidly spread across the globe and as of this writing , has affected more than 90,000 people worldwide .
Although China launched an early emergency response , the infection rapidly spread .
In early January 2020 , a total of 24 days after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a family traveled from Wuhan Shenzhen , spreading the virus to that city .
Subsequently , more cases were reported .
From there , the virus seemed to transit the world .
Researchers began analyzing the data from lab tests , nasal swabs , and stool samples .
Their findings show that common coronaviruses were the predominant strain .
This is most likely due to their global distribution and their non-negligible mortality .
This full-text article , from the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents , reports : • None As of 2 March @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for SARS-CoV-2 worldwide , with 3086 deaths ( mortality rate 3.4 % ) .
• None Between 1 January 2020 and 2 March 2020 , 7,059 samples were positive for coronaviruses with two deaths .
There was no identification of SARS-CoV-2 .
The strain OC43 and the other with strain HKU1 were the only association with deaths .
Underlying co-morbidities were not lists .
• None As of 2 March 2020 , among OECD countries , 7476 patients had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 , with 96 deaths ( mortality rate 1.3 % ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in France , 191 people had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 , with three deaths ( mortality rate 1.6 % ) .
• “ This mortality rate of SARS-CoV2 In European or American developed countries of a comparable economic level the SARS-CoV2 mortality rate is 1.3 % .
This is not significantly different from that for common coronaviruses identified in the study hospital in France .
( mortality rate 0.8 % ; p=0.11 ) • None “ In fact , mortality from respiratory infections is extremely dependent on the quality of care and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have better prognosis in countries with superior medical infrastructures.
” • None “ Therefore , in OECD countries , SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to be deadlier than other circulating viruses.
” I hope that this historical discussion puts SARS-CoV2 and the COVID19 pandemic into perspective .
We are watching the same hysteria , the same fear-mongering , the same low death rates .
And this time , we may even have a medication , hydroxychloroquine , that eliminates the severe symptoms quickly .
Get involved in preserving your right to refuse … because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the medications work .
In Coronovirus – I ’ ll be discussing my perspective adult mandatory vaccination .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888 Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is an osteopathic medical doctor , board-certified in three specialties .
She is the founder of Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center , a medical clinic located near Cleveland , Ohio .
Her company , Courses4Mastery.com provides online education and training regarding all aspects of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ invested nearly 20 years and more than 40,000 hours documenting and exposing the problems associated with vaccines .
As an internationally known speaker and author , her many articles have been translated into at least 15 languages .
She is a frequent guest on radio and TV to share her knowledge and educate parents on why they should Just .
Say .No .
to vaccines .

by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, AOBNM. ABIHM
I’ve been sitting back, listening to and watching the crushing plan “they” have designed for us. I’ve been viewing this fiasco through the lens of history. I wrote this article to give you some perspective. I couldn’t help but think when this COVID19 blitz started, “How soon we forget.”
Coronavirus Spread
Over the last three weeks, unless you have been cloistered in a monastery in Tibet, you have been bombarded with at least 2.1 billion media mentions regarding a new form of coronavirus that has spread rapidly around the world. As a comparison, when Ebola was in the news last year, it received a mere 16.3 million media mentions.
The world economy has ground to a stop over the pandemic spread of coronavirus SARS-CoV2, the proper name for the virus. This name was chosen because the virus is genetically related to the coronavirus responsible for the SARS outbreak of 2003. The SARS-CoV2 virus is the cause of the coronavirus disease 2019, or COVID-19. The two terms are in use interchangeably but the words are not synonyms.
According to the CDC, coronaviruses are named for the crown-like spikes on their surface. There are 36 coronaviruses in the family Coronaviridae. The viruses cause respiratory or intestinal infections in humans and some animals. These common, mostly benign respiratory viruses were first identified in humans in the mid-1960s.
Besides the three know pandemic viruses that caused SARS, MERS and now COVID19, there are four coronaviruses that commonly infect people are:
229E (alpha coronavirus)
NL63 (alpha coronavirus)
OC43 (beta coronavirus)
HKU1 (beta coronavirus)
These four viruses cause 10–20% of respiratory infections worldwide and are present on all continents. Most likely, you’ve had exposure to, and perhaps ill from, a coronavirus infection at some point in your life. And you may actually have some level of natural immunity to this virus.
Round #1, 2002: SARS—Coronavirus
The first reported case of the “mysterious flu” was reported in November 2002. Scientists went into high gear and found this highly pathogenic coronavirus originating in the Guangdong province in China. Experts were concerned because there were no previous cases in humans before. Named SARS-CoV, for “severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by a coronavirus,” its spread set off panicked alerts across the globe. The WHO issued its first global alerts in early March 2003. The alerts went out even though the majority of cases were mostly in the Chinese province.
Ten years later a similar, highly pathogenic coronavirus called the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) would emerge in Middle Eastern countries leading to severe respiratory distress syndrome in humans.
Teams of experts went to investigate the SARS outbreak. The hysteria ramped up quickly, and within weeks, the Hong Kong Department of Health issued an unprecedented quarantine order. And order to keep residents inside their homes. Shortly thereafter, Mainland China followed suit, closing public schools, cinemas, and libraries. The closures being an attempt to stop the spread of the virus. As reports of more cases came into Toronto, Canadian health officials warned residents to quarantine themselves, wear masks, and in some cases, just stay home.
Over the six month duration of the pandemic, 8,049 people tested positive for the virus. The vast majority of cases occurred in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, with a resulting 774 deaths, or close to 10% of known cases.
But since the total number of cases only represents those ill enough to seek medical help, the actual death rate is unknown and may have been far less.
Economic Implications With Minimal Affected
In spite of the fact that few people in Canada were affected (251) and even fewer died (43), the Canadian Tourism Board estimated that the SARS epidemic cost the nation’s economy $419 million. The Ontario health minister reported that the cost to the province’s health-care system, including money spent to develop special clinics and stock them with supplies to protect healthcare workers, was nearly $763 million.
SARS had a significant effect on the airline industry. Singapore Airlines lost $6 million each day during April and May when SARS choked off intra- and inter-Asian travel. Other less obvious industries that suffered during the outbreak were retail sales, hotels, and restaurants. When translated into an absolute dollar amount, these figures imply that the global economic loss from SARS was close to $40 billion U.S. in 2003. This figure is much greater than the medical costs of treating SARS patients.
Is this sounding familiar?
As SARS-CoV faded into obscurity in 2004, and has never been seen again, a new pandemic was coming to the forefront. But this time, it was an influenza virus, H5N1, that was gaining the attention of the WHO and the mainstream media.
Identifying influenza viruses is based on three distinct immunogenic types—A, B, and C—and a large number of subtypes. Type C viruses are either assymptomatic or very mild respiratory illness and do not carry with them a public health impact. Influenza type B infections also tend to cause minor illnesses. Having a propensity for older persons, influenza type B viruses are most oftenly occur in nursing home outbreaks. Research shows influenza types C and B as only active in humans. Until the emergence of the H5N1 virus, the only influenza A viruses in humans, since 1977, have been H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2.
Influenza A subtypes have been designated as either mildly pathogenic, meaning they cause minimal or no disease. Or they can be highly pathogenic, meaning their presence has been associated with widespread infection. The antigen subtypes H5, H7, and H9 are the cause of all outbreaks of highly pathogenic influenza. This has been the case since the 1980s.
Round #2, 2005: Bird Flu, H5N1
A pandemic by definition is an outbreak of an infection occurring over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and usually affects a large number of people. By those standards, the bird flu exploded onto the world stage in May 1997 through an ironically innocent setting.
It Started in a Zoo
A Hong Kong pre-school had set up a small petting zoo on its grounds, making a home for five chickens and eight ducks. The children were happy to spend time with their feathered friends. Several days after the school aviary experience, a three-year-old boy began to cough. The illness and fever progressed rapidly, and the boy’s parents rushed him to Victoria Hospital where he was admitted with pneumonia and respiratory distress. Six days later, he died.
Pathologists found no underlying immunodeficiency or cardiopulmonary disease that would have contributed to the boy’s death. Three months later, the virus was confirmed to be avian influenza A virus with surface antigens H5N1. In a report published later, researchers held that this particular bird flu virus had not previously caused infection in humans.
Teams from the WHO and the CDC descended on Hong Kong to determine how the boy had been exposed to the bird flu virus and to assess the potential public health impact. According to investigators, one of the chickens in the petting zoo had died several days before the child’s symptoms had appeared. Postulation suggests that there was exposure to the ill bird, meaning, the virus had “jumped species” to infect the boy.
In the following days and weeks, officials began scrambling to determine if the virus infection had spread to those who had come in contact with the ill child. Approximately 2,000 human samples were collected from those who had been in contact with the boy, the school’s petting zoo, or the birds from the rural areas. No additional cases were identified. Then, a second case of H5N1 infection was confirmed in Hong Kong. Then, 18 more cases appeared over the following months. With news of the direct bird-to-human transmission, the CDC and WHO believed the next pandemic had arrived.
Again, is this sounding familiar?
Throughout the evolving epidemic, China denied the presence of bird flu in chickens or humans. However, that changed in 2005 when China reported 7 human cases with three deaths to the WHO. All across the expansive country, millions of farmers were living in close proximity to billions of chickens, the reservoir of the H5N1 virus. Reporting only seven H5N1 human infections seems extraordinarily low. Many virologists around the world have questioned the relative absence of human cases, given there were 30 highly pathogenic viral outbreaks in poultry across ten provinces throughout 2005.
China lied twice before; is there any doubt they could very well be lying now?
Round #3, 2009: Swine Flu (H1N1)
In the spring of 2009, another pandemic siren shrieked across the US and around the world. This time, it was over a novel strain of influenza A. With the origin and discovery of the virus in pigs from a small region in central Mexico, the outbreak became known as “swine flu” and the viral nomenclature was H1N1. The WHO quickly declared a “public health emergency of international concern.” By June, the WHO and the CDC stopped counting cases. The next step was to declare the swine flu outbreak as a pandemic.
About that same time, experts around the world were saying that this H1N1 swine flu virus was not aggressive enough to cause a worldwide pandemic. They noted that the mortality rate among confirmed cases was 1.6% in Mexico and only 0.1% in the United States. At press conferences, various medical experts made remarks such as, “It is unclear if we need to use vaccines against the swine flu because the virus does not have a pandemic nature.” Additional remarks include, “Does the world really needs a vaccine for an illness that so far appears mild?”
Onto the Fast-Track
Nonetheless, loaded with government funds, the Big Boys in vaccine manufacturing plowed ahead. By September, Pandemrix and Arepanrix, both made by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) were approved. Focetria, made by Novartis was also approved for use the following month. Celvapan, a whole virus vaccine made by Baxter was approved but soon withdrawn from market because it caused extremely high fevers.
All of these vaccines were fast-tracked to market with no long term studies and very few test subjects in the trials. Let’s take a look at the ingredients*:
Pandemerix: Adjuvant: AS03 which contains squalene (10.69 mg), polysorbate 80 (4.86 mg) and alpha-tocopherol (11.86 mg) Other ingredients: egg proteins, polysorbate 80, octoxynol 10, thimerosal (mercury), sodium chloride, disodium hydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, potassium chloride, magnesium chloride, water for injections.
Focetia: Adjuvant: MF59 which contains squalene (9.75 mg), polysorbate 80 (1.175 mg) and sorbitan trioleate (1.175 mg) Other Ingredients: egg proteins, thimerosal (multidose vial only), sodium chloride, potassium chloride, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, disodium phosphate dihydrate, magnesium chloride hexahydrate, calcium chloride dihydrate, sodium citrate, citric acid and water for injections. [what do all those chemicals do to human cells?]
Arepanrix Adjuvant: AS03 which contains squalene (10.69 mg), polysorbate 80 (4.86 mg), NS alpha-tocopherol (11.86 mg) Other Ingredients: egg proteins, thimerosal , formaldehyde, sodium deoxycholate, sucrose, sodium chloride, disodium hydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, potassium chloride, water for injections.
*for a detailed discussion regarding vaccine ingredients, see www.VaccineU.com and the 7-part course on Problematic Ingredients.
Ineffective Vaccines
The pandemic vaccines were very problematic. In fact, Pandemerix was later shown to conclusively be associated with narcolepsy. More than 1300 people who received a vaccine to prevent the flu developed narcolepsy, an incurable, debilitating condition that causes overpowering daytime sleepiness, sometimes accompanied by sudden muscle weakness in response to strong emotions such as laughter or anger. Worse, the vaccines did little to lower the death rate.
The pandemic began to taper off in November 2009, and by August 10, 2010, the Director-General of the WHO, Margaret Chan, announced the end of the H1N1 pandemic. The CDC estimates that between April 12, 2009 to April 10, 2010, there were 60.8 million people infected, with 274,000 hospitalizations, and 12,469 deaths—a mortality rate of 0.02% due to the virus.
Again, is this sounding familiar? Millions infected; low mortality rate. No economic cataclysmic events, no “social distancing”, no masks, no community lockdowns.
Round #4, 2020: SARS-CoV2 – Coronavirus2
A third, highly pathogenic virus emerged out of Wuhan, China in December 2019. SARS-CoV2, the novel coronavirus, has rapidly spread across the globe and as of this writing, has affected more than 90,000 people worldwide.
Although China launched an early emergency response, the infection rapidly spread. In early January 2020, a total of 24 days after the index COVID-19 case in Wuhan, a family traveled from Wuhan Shenzhen, spreading the virus to that city. Subsequently, more cases were reported. From there, the virus seemed to transit the world.
Researchers began analyzing the data from lab tests, nasal swabs, and stool samples. Their findings show that common coronaviruses were the predominant strain. This is most likely due to their global distribution and their non-negligible mortality.
The Numbers Don’t Lie
This full-text article, from the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, reports:
As of 2 March 2020, 90,307 patients had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 worldwide, with 3086 deaths (mortality rate 3.4%).
Between 1 January 2020 and 2 March 2020, 7,059 samples were positive for coronaviruses with two deaths. There was no identification of SARS-CoV-2. The strain OC43 and the other with strain HKU1 were the only association with deaths. Underlying co-morbidities were not lists.
As of 2 March 2020, among OECD countries, 7476 patients had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, with 96 deaths (mortality rate 1.3%)
As of 2 March 2020, in France, 191 people had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, with three deaths (mortality rate 1.6%).
“ This mortality rate of SARS-CoV2 In European or American developed countries of a comparable economic level the SARS-CoV2 mortality rate is 1.3% . This is not significantly different from that for common coronaviruses identified in the study hospital in France. (mortality rate 0.8%; p=0.11)
“In fact, mortality from respiratory infections is extremely dependent on the quality of care and access to care , and severe forms have better prognosis in countries with superior medical infrastructures.”
“Therefore, in OECD countries, SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to be deadlier than other circulating viruses.”
I hope that this historical discussion puts SARS-CoV2 and the COVID19 pandemic into perspective. We are watching the same hysteria, the same fear-mongering, the same low death rates. And this time, we may even have a medication, hydroxychloroquine, that eliminates the severe symptoms quickly. Get involved in preserving your right to refuse … because the vaccine is coming, even if the medications work.
In Coronovirus Part 2 – I’ll be discussing the dangerous 2005 PREP Act
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is an osteopathic medical doctor, board-certified in three specialties. She is the founder of Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center, a medical clinic located near Cleveland, Ohio. Her company, Courses4Mastery.com provides online education and training regarding all aspects of vaccines and vaccination.
Dr. Tenpenny has invested nearly 20 years and more than 40,000 hours documenting and exposing the problems associated with vaccines. As an internationally known speaker and author, her many articles have been translated into at least 15 languages. She is a frequent guest on radio and TV to share her knowledge and educate parents on why they should Just. Say .No. to vaccines.
Photocredit:ID 142634156 © Sergeyacros | Dreamstime.com


vaxxter--2020-02-11--Coronavirus Vaccine: A Year Away

Coronavirus Vaccine: A Year Away

The first big mistake in the coronavirus pandemic emerged when the Chinese Communist Party ( CCP ) tried , but failed , to contain the outbreak in a cloak of silence .
The second ( and worst ) mistake fell at the feet of the World Health Organization ( WHO ) , the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) , and other institutions that have long promoted the empty marketing point of “ global health security.
” We are quickly learning there is no such thing .
In the latter miscalculation , we now know their wont @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time to slow down , let alone contain , the novel 2019-nCoV virus .
Leading vaccine experts , from Novartis ’ CEO Vas Narasimhan to Jeremy Farrar , the director of the Wellcome Trust , a UK-based health foundation with more than $ 34 billion in assets to support research , have stated as much in recent interviews with CNBC News and Der Spiegel International , respectively .
With the experts on record stating it will take more than a year to develop , test and confirm or adjust a coronavirus vaccine formulation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it , what is occuring to stop the transmission of the virus ?
Since the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa , the WHO and CDC have insisted that the only way to “ save lives ” is by preventing disease and not treating the host .
That myopic , tunnel vision has cost thousands of lives for people who died unnecessarily due to the Ebola virus .
I interviewed Dr. David S. Fedson , a pharmaceutical executive and clinician for much of his 50-year career .
He and other scientists published studies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published or quoted by the mainstream press , from the New York Times to the Washington Post .
In short , Fedson stated that “ treating the host ” with off-the-shelf antivirals and other drugs in combination resulted in a high probability of survival .
The idea was simple : Give the dying a fighting chance to block the replication of the virus , while boosting their immune system long enough to survive and recover .
This sane , logical , and ethical remedy has long been ignored .
In another example of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emergency .
This crisis was again declared by the WHO without an investigation into the true cause of the birth defects in northeast Brazil .
That spring , the CDC and National Institute of Health ( NIH ) conducted a roadshow , claiming Zika was going to create identical clusters of birth defects in the United States .
That short-term hysteria extracted more than $ 1.5 billion for a Zika vaccine that was abandoned in 2017 by both Sanofi and the US Army .
Before Congress handed over their large share of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ existing tapeworm remedy could stop Zika cold .
To no avail .
Neither the Obama Administration nor US health agencies had any interest in an inexpensive existing remedy that worked .
It was “ create a vaccine or bust.
” Similarly , in the past week , the WHO published a statement that it ’ s seeking $ 675 million to “ combat coronavirus.
” Mind you , this large sum of money is a stealth form of wealth redistribution .
Its statement read , in part : “ WHO issued a call @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with US $ 675 million in funding to help some 60 low- and middle-income countries that are at significant risk of infection with the novel coronavirus that originated in Wuhan China prepare for possible outbreaks.
” For the WHO , it ’ s about ramping up capacity to deliver testing , masks , respirators , and medical supplies and equipment .
But their declarations were not about research to repurpose treatments to help the victims .
“ We are launching a strategic preparedness plan to support countries to detect and respond to cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WHO director ] .
“ We are requesting US $ 675 million to fund the plan for the next three months , including US $ 60 million to fund WHO operations .
The rest is for countries at risk.
” This author has long been critical of the WHO ’ s glad-handing and covering up for China ’ s failed response and secrecy to the outbreak .
Worst , the Chinese Communist Party ( CCP ) has refused to share the raw metadata about the genomic code of the disease , as of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a baseline code of the virus so that scientists can see what makes the 2019-nCoV tick and whether it comes from a bat reservoir or from a biological lab , as many have suspected .
The close proximity between the Wuhan Institute of Virology at the Wuhan City “ wet market ” only heightens that suspicion .
That is why the Trump Administration announced that it has deployed the National Academy of Science to investigate whether the virus was bioengineered .
Like global health security , “ pandemic preparedness ” is just another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ market , and then hide , its inept bureaucracy and divert attention away from how truly unprepared the global health agency is and why their “ vaccine-only ” solution is finally being exposed to fail .
In a startling headline , one health expert stated : “ It ’ s definitely too late to contain ( the coronavirus ) due to the millions of people who have now fled the hot zone crisis.
” While the leaders at the WHO continue to peddle everything from masks to hope of a coronavirus vaccine to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refuse to look at the stark , geometric nature of the pandemic and deal with that threat .
China ’ s opacity and the WHO ’ s slow , unprepared response have left these agencies holding a bag of CCP propaganda points .
Now the heavy-handed response has led to the lockdown of dozens of cities in China ’ s mainland , the quarantine of cruises ships , snatching people off the streets and welding the doors shut of apartment quarantine centers and the interruption of air travel to and from China .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ weeks .
At the other end of the spectrum , and to China ’ s credit , officials began testing the effectiveness of numerous available antiviral drugs on the infected in mid-January .
Chinese researchers applied for a patent on an antiviral drug candidate called Remdesivir that was owned by Gilead Sciences , Inc. Medscape reported that a randomized control trial of the antiviral drug is underway in China .
They didn ’ t wait .
Didn ’ t hope for a vaccine .
They took decisive action .
The results from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus is happening .
This patent application may be outright theft of the intellectual property of the drug .
This could be very damaging to a pharmaceutical industry that has relied heavily on China for its cheap labor .
All four major vaccine manufacturers—Pfizer , Merck , GSK , Sanofi—have built plants in China over the past decade .
The patent theft to address the pandemic represents an existential threat to Big Pharma ’ s global supply chain .
In the West , countrues will soon feel the economic shocks of supply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ includes automotive , shipping , energy , aerospace , mobile phone , electronics and many others .
It ’ s only a matter of time before the drug industry feels the same slow down since China provides more than 9 % of the US generic drugs and many of the “ life-saving ” vaccines .
It ’ s time for the US and other democracies in the Western world to break their dependency on China as a global supplier .
It ’ s also time for the world to stop pushing for pharmaceuticals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for outbreaks of infections .
Governments need to recognize a failed trial and move on , as the US did when it finally canceled the trial of an HIV/AIDS vaccine when it failed to protect .
The coronavirus crisis has exposed two truths in 2020 : • China , under the Xi Jinping regime , shows its callous disdain and lack of humanity towards its citizens when they become ill. How much more aggressive will they be in an act of war ?
• The WHO , the self-proclaimed health agency to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during an epidemic .
Thus , the US should defund the WHO and ignore its pleas for coronavirus money .
The WHO ’ s ties to Big Pharma and socialist leanings toward the CCP have failed to execute a full-scale plan to protect the world .
Back to the drawing board .
This time , hopefully , more intelligent and thoughtful minds will prevail .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
James Grundvig has written and published as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from autism , its cause and treatments , clean technology , green energy , and the BP Oil Spill , to business and Wall Street , and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics since 2005 .
He is the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain logistics in the Construction IT space .
James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area .
He is the author of Master Manipulator : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC .

By James Grundvig, Investigative Reporter, Vaxxter contributor
The first big mistake in the coronavirus pandemic emerged when the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) tried, but failed, to contain the outbreak in a cloak of silence. The second (and worst) mistake fell at the feet of the World Health Organization (WHO), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and other institutions that have long promoted the empty marketing point of “global health security.”
We are quickly learning there is no such thing.
In the latter miscalculation, we now know their wont be enough time develop a vaccine in time to slow down, let alone contain, the novel 2019-nCoV virus. Leading vaccine experts, from Novartis’ CEO Vas Narasimhan to Jeremy Farrar, the director of the Wellcome Trust, a UK-based health foundation with more than $34 billion in assets to support research, have stated as much in recent interviews with CNBC News and Der Spiegel International, respectively.
With the experts on record stating it will take more than a year to develop, test and confirm or adjust a coronavirus vaccine formulation, mass-produce it, and then mass-distribute it, what is occuring to stop the transmission of the virus?
Pandemic (Un-)Preparedness
Since the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa, the WHO and CDC have insisted that the only way to “save lives” is by preventing disease and not treating the host. That myopic, tunnel vision has cost thousands of lives for people who died unnecessarily due to the Ebola virus.
I interviewed Dr. David S. Fedson, a pharmaceutical executive and clinician for much of his 50-year career. He and other scientists published studies and wrote papers and op-eds that were published or quoted by the mainstream press, from the New York Times to the Washington Post. In short, Fedson stated that “treating the host” with off-the-shelf antivirals and other drugs in combination resulted in a high probability of survival. The idea was simple: Give the dying a fighting chance to block the replication of the virus, while boosting their immune system long enough to survive and recover. This sane, logical, and ethical remedy has long been ignored.
In another example of institutional arrogance was the 2016 Zika global emergency. This crisis was again declared by the WHO without an investigation into the true cause of the birth defects in northeast Brazil.
That spring, the CDC and National Institute of Health (NIH) conducted a roadshow, claiming Zika was going to create identical clusters of birth defects in the United States. That short-term hysteria extracted more than $1.5 billion for a Zika vaccine that was abandoned in 2017 by both Sanofi and the US Army. Before Congress handed over their large share of the loot, Florida State University discovered an existing tapeworm remedy could stop Zika cold. To no avail. Neither the Obama Administration nor US health agencies had any interest in an inexpensive existing remedy that worked. It was “create a vaccine or bust.”
Funds Aren’t For Treatment
Similarly, in the past week, the WHO published a statement that it’s seeking $675 million to “combat coronavirus.” Mind you, this large sum of money is a stealth form of wealth redistribution. Its statement read, in part:
“WHO issued a call to the global community to come forward with US$675 million in funding to help some 60 low- and middle-income countries that are at significant risk of infection with the novel coronavirus that originated in Wuhan China prepare for possible outbreaks.”
For the WHO, it’s about ramping up capacity to deliver testing, masks, respirators, and medical supplies and equipment. But their declarations were not about research to repurpose treatments to help the victims.
“We are launching a strategic preparedness plan to support countries to detect and respond to cases,” said Dr. Tedros [the WHO director]. “We are requesting US$ 675 million to fund the plan for the next three months, including US$ 60 million to fund WHO operations. The rest is for countries at risk.”
Exposed to Fail
This author has long been critical of the WHO’s glad-handing and covering up for China’s failed response and secrecy to the outbreak. Worst, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has refused to share the raw metadata about the genomic code of the disease, as of this writing.
But China has published a baseline code of the virus so that scientists can see what makes the 2019-nCoV tick and whether it comes from a bat reservoir or from a biological lab, as many have suspected. The close proximity between the Wuhan Institute of Virology at the Wuhan City “wet market” only heightens that suspicion.
That is why the Trump Administration announced that it has deployed the National Academy of Science to investigate whether the virus was bioengineered.
Like global health security, “pandemic preparedness” is just another talking point used by the WHO to market, and then hide, its inept bureaucracy and divert attention away from how truly unprepared the global health agency is and why their “vaccine-only” solution is finally being exposed to fail.
“Definitely Too Late to Contain”
In a startling headline, one health expert stated: “It’s definitely too late to contain (the coronavirus) due to the millions of people who have now fled the hot zone crisis.”
Pretty damning words.
While the leaders at the WHO continue to peddle everything from masks to hope of a coronavirus vaccine to save the day, they continue to refuse to look at the stark, geometric nature of the pandemic and deal with that threat. China’s opacity and the WHO’s slow, unprepared response have left these agencies holding a bag of CCP propaganda points. Now the heavy-handed response has led to the lockdown of dozens of cities in China’s mainland, the quarantine of cruises ships, snatching people off the streets and welding the doors shut of apartment quarantine centers and the interruption of air travel to and from China.
All of this in a mere six weeks.
At the other end of the spectrum, and to China’s credit, officials began testing the effectiveness of numerous available antiviral drugs on the infected in mid-January. Chinese researchers applied for a patent on an antiviral drug candidate called Remdesivir that was owned by Gilead Sciences, Inc. Medscape reported that a randomized control trial of the antiviral drug is underway in China. They didn’t wait. Didn’t hope for a vaccine. They took decisive action. The results from the antivirals are mixed, but recovery from the virus is happening.
This patent application may be outright theft of the intellectual property of the drug. This could be very damaging to a pharmaceutical industry that has relied heavily on China for its cheap labor. All four major vaccine manufacturers—Pfizer, Merck, GSK, Sanofi—have built plants in China over the past decade. The patent theft to address the pandemic represents an existential threat to Big Pharma’s global supply chain.
Breaking From Eastern Dependency
In the West, countrues will soon feel the economic shocks of supply chain disruption across all industries. This includes automotive, shipping, energy, aerospace, mobile phone, electronics and many others. It’s only a matter of time before the drug industry feels the same slow down since China provides more than 9% of the US generic drugs and many of the “life-saving” vaccines.
It’s time for the US and other democracies in the Western world to break their dependency on China as a global supplier. It’s also time for the world to stop pushing for pharmaceuticals and vaccines to be the only solutions for outbreaks of infections. Governments need to recognize a failed trial and move on, as the US did when it finally canceled the trial of an HIV/AIDS vaccine when it failed to protect.
The coronavirus crisis has exposed two truths in 2020:
China, under the Xi Jinping regime, shows its callous disdain and lack of humanity towards its citizens when they become ill. How much more aggressive will they be in an act of war? The WHO, the self-proclaimed health agency to the world, offers neither security nor preparedness during an epidemic. Thus, the US should defund the WHO and ignore its pleas for coronavirus money.
The WHO’s ties to Big Pharma and socialist leanings toward the CCP have failed to execute a full-scale plan to protect the world. Back to the drawing board. This time, hopefully, more intelligent and thoughtful minds will prevail.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist, covering subjects from autism, its cause and treatments, clean technology, green energy, and the BP Oil Spill, to business and Wall Street, and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics since 2005. He is the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain logistics in the Construction IT space. James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area. He is the author of Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC.
photo credit: 171629122 © Nuthawut Somsuk – Dreamstime.com


vaxxter--2020-02-06--Ebola 101: Early Beginnings – Part 1

Ebola 101: Early Beginnings – Part 1

The Ebola virus gets its name from a little river in the region of the Bumba Zone of the Equateur Region .
The Bumba Zone rests in Zaire ’ s northern frontier where the mysterious “ illness ” first appeared .
Health officials didn ’ t know what it was at first ; as is usually the case in the narratives presented to us .
It was 1976 when an outbreak occurred at the Yambuka Mission Hospital ( YMH ) ; a shanty hospital operated by Belgian Catholic missionaries since 1935 .
The mission had very little electricity , no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and no protective clothing for the staff writes a WHO 1978 bulletin .
The hospital served as the principal source of health care for , perhaps , 60,000 people in Yandongi and adjacent collectivities .
People passing through Bumba Zone frequently traveled long distances to attend clinics there .
The nun-nurses did not turn people away .
According to The Coming Plague by Laurie Garrett , who has been described as a “ NWO Globalist , ” the outbreak happened shortly after the sisters treated a man from the neighboring town of Yandongi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ severe nosebleeds , and fever .
In Garett ’ s book , Patient Zero leaves two days later despite the sisters ’ advice , and no one ever sees him again .
And in another account by the WHO , he dies in the hospital .
Either way “ he ” conveniently turned out to be “ a person completely unknown to the residents and authorities of Yandongi , ” adds the WHO .
Oftentimes the source of the virus remains mysterious or reaches folkloric proportions : e.g .
it came from bat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is no proof , and one at best can attempt to sort through the facts and put them together .
Within one week , several other persons who had received injections at YMH also suffered from Ebola hemorrhagic fever .
Soon , the hospital was full of people who were heating up and basically bleeding uncontrollably from the inside out .
The WHO 1978 bulletin adds , “ The index case in this outbreak had an onset of symptoms of five days following giving an injection of chloroquine for presumptive malaria at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” The horror was magnified by strange behavior .
People snapped .
Tore off their clothing .
Ran out of the hospital , “ screaming incoherently.
” Soon ‘ virus hunters , ’ scientists , and researchers from various Viral/Special Pathogen branches ( e.g .
the WHO , CDC ) , as well as The Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp , descended into Zaire , fearful yet fascinated .
These groups suspected it was related to the Yellow Fever .
They then settled that it was “ a virus morphologically similar to Marburg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states the 1978 WHO Report .
They pulled samples from bedbugs , rats , bats , and other creatures that come into contact with humans .
But there was no Ebola to study .
Meanwhile , Ebola virus antibodies were found in five persons who were not ill and had not had contact with the ” infected ” villages or the Yambuku hospital during the epidemic .
“ If these findings can be confirmed by an independent method of testing , they would suggest that the virus is , in fact , endemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ further effort to uncover a viral reservoir in Zaire.
” But , to my knowledge , this was not — and has not — been proven .
Between September 1st and October 24th , 1976 , 318 cases of acute viral hemorrhagic fever occurred in northern Zaire .
There were 280 deaths and only 38 serologically confirmed survivors .
According to lore , literally hundreds of people were involved in the hunt for the virus ’ s origin .
In the end , the hunt cost more than $ 1 Million USD .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ all these workers , the story of Ebola ’ s genesis is riddled with holes and inconsistencies .
Given all the personnel deaths , it didn ’ t take long for the Yambuku Mission Hospital to become nonfunctional .
Interestingly , almost all subsequent cases of Ebola either received injections at the hospital or had been in close contact with another person who had Ebola .
Most of these cases occurred during the first four weeks of the epidemic .
Thereafter , the hospital was closed , with 11 of the 17 staff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ writes ( in passing ) that four of the sisters who initially died had been recently vaccinated .
With What ?
Isn ’ t this worthy of more exploration ?
We don ’ t know for certain , although it ’ s likely it was for hemorrhagic fever .
This also raises an eyebrow because , in many instances , the narrative is inverted like a dirty pair of underwear on an extended road trip .
The unvaccinated are described as threats when in reality , it ’ s the vaccinated people who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first Belgian nun , a midwife , became ill on September 14th and died on the 19th , 1976 .
It is possible that if the wrong vaccine was administered it could contribute to infectiousness or result in death .
For instance , Nurse M.N received the Marburg plasma intravenously and died four days later , on October 20th .
In a third account I found this : “ It was a ‘ little bit dicey to point to four Catholic missionaries , ” writes The Coming Plague .
There is also a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lack thereof .
Some of the mercenaries in the villages had recently returned after extensive traveling .
Read : lots of contact with foreign bacteria or pathogens .
Finally , virological studies were limited .
The only clinical laboratory test done on patients admitted to Yambuku Hospital was urinary protein .
This was reported as uniformly positive and was used as a major diagnostic criterion by the nursing sisters early in the epidemic .
In fact “ suspected cases were not closely examined , but medicines were still administered and arrangements were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This stems from a report from the 1978 WHO Bulletin .
Even when there was no confirmation of the Ebola virus , patients were treated with antimalarial drugs , aspirin , antibiotics , and antipyretics to exclude other diseases common to the area .
At least three of the sisters were also given an assortment of arguably experimental treatments .
Read more here .
Isn ’ t it odd then that when on November 5th , 1976 , Geoffrey Platt , a lab tech at the former Microbiological Research Establishment in Porton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while taking a sample from an Ebola-infected guinea pig , his treatment bore no resemblance to the Zaire locals .
He was treated with human interferon & convalescent serum .
The course of his disease was mild & he fully recovered .
Incidentally , the Porton Down military installation was founded in 1916 and is the oldest chemical warfare facility in the world .
It wasn ’ t until the 1960s that the government admitted the existence of the 7,000-acre site near Salisbury , United Kingdom .
Writing On The Wall : Whistleblower @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after I started reading Garrett ’ s The Coming Plague , I came in contact with X , a journalist-turned-vaccine-whistleblower who didn ’ t want to use her name .
She has been covering viral outbreaks for more than a decade .
She has written about impending “ Global Medical Martial ” while shedding light on a litany of vaccine safety issues , including the World Health Organization ’ s ( WHO ) ’ s fraud , abuse , corruption , and mismanagement .
“ We don ’ t have Ebola , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mean if you look at who developed these vaccines , they ’ re always are labs involved and the first Ebola outbreak [ … ] the people who got Ebola in Zaire , Congo in 1976 , were people who took a vaccine.
” Framed in this way… we observe a twist in the reported story .
According to X , officials eventually sent a military attaché , a commander colonel and the epidemiologist of the government ” to the region .
His name was Jean-Jacques Muyembe and he was appointed to investigate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Those who investigated Ebola included Jean-Jacques Muyembe , a tropical disease expert who studied in Belgium alongside Peter Piot , now well-known biological weapons and tropical disease expert .
At the time of the first Ebola virus outbreak , he was only 27 years old .
Sukato Mandzomba , a member of the medical staff was the only employee who survived the infection and illness , writes Garret .
Nature mentioned her in a 2017 piece titled Ebola survivors still immune to the virus after 40 years .
The official explanation is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infected .
Nurses in the hospital didn ’ t sterilize the needle and that caused the spread of the infection .
On the surface , this sounds like a reasonable explanation .
But , it doesn ’ t make sense in the context of the broad picture .
What if the virus was deliberately put into circulation , wonders X .
“ A thorough examination reveals the inklings of ulterior motives.
” In conclusion , the WHO itself stated that limited ecological investigations were done since the epidemiology of the outbreak “ strongly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into the Bumba Zone.
” Back in 1978 , the WHO conceded that much-desired information was never obtained .
And that the means by which the virus was introduced can not be confirmed .
As in the case of Marburg viruses , the source of Ebola virus is completely unknown beyond the simple fact that it is “ African in origin.
” On October 27th an official account was given to disseminate to ‘ press corps ’ .
The findings were “ conservatively designed to cast a sense of routine around a crisis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consider that the timeline and origins of this virus remain fuzzy .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888 Maryam Henein is an investigative journalist , functional medicine consultant , and founder and editor-in-chief of HoneyColony .
She is also the director of the award-winning documentary film Vanishing of the Bees , narrated by Ellen Page .
She is currently being shadowbanned .
Please follower her on Twitter

By Maryam Henein, Vaxxter Contributor and Founder, HoneyColony
Somewhere, on the other side of the planet, in a hidden corner of a tropical rainforest, a new virus is surely incubating. A pathological killer that could unleash a deadly plague at any time. Ebola: Inside the Deadly Outbreak, produced for Discovery Channel (video since deleted from Youtube)
Ebola 101: Its Early Beginnings
The Ebola virus gets its name from a little river in the region of the Bumba Zone of the Equateur Region. The Bumba Zone rests in Zaire’s northern frontier where the mysterious “illness” first appeared. Health officials didn’t know what it was at first; as is usually the case in the narratives presented to us.
It was 1976 when an outbreak occurred at the Yambuka Mission Hospital (YMH); a shanty hospital operated by Belgian Catholic missionaries since 1935. The mission had very little electricity, no diesel fuel, no functional laboratory, and no protective clothing for the staff writes a WHO 1978 bulletin.
The hospital served as the principal source of health care for, perhaps, 60,000 people in Yandongi and adjacent collectivities. People passing through Bumba Zone frequently traveled long distances to attend clinics there. The nun-nurses did not turn people away.
According to The Coming Plague by Laurie Garrett, who has been described as a “NWO Globalist,” the outbreak happened shortly after the sisters treated a man from the neighboring town of Yandongi. The man suffered from diarrhea, severe nosebleeds, and fever.
In Garett’s book, Patient Zero leaves two days later despite the sisters’ advice, and no one ever sees him again. And in another account by the WHO, he dies in the hospital.
Either way “he” conveniently turned out to be “a person completely unknown to the residents and authorities of Yandongi,” adds the WHO. Oftentimes the source of the virus remains mysterious or reaches folkloric proportions: e.g. it came from bat soup or a seafood market. There is no proof, and one at best can attempt to sort through the facts and put them together.
Infection Spreads
Within one week, several other persons who had received injections at YMH also suffered from Ebola hemorrhagic fever. Soon, the hospital was full of people who were heating up and basically bleeding uncontrollably from the inside out.
The WHO 1978 bulletin adds, “The index case in this outbreak had an onset of symptoms of five days following giving an injection of chloroquine for presumptive malaria at the outpatient clinic at (YMH).”
The horror was magnified by strange behavior. People snapped. Tore off their clothing. Ran out of the hospital, “screaming incoherently.”
Soon ‘virus hunters,’ scientists, and researchers from various Viral/Special Pathogen branches (e.g. the WHO, CDC), as well as The Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, descended into Zaire, fearful yet fascinated. These groups suspected it was related to the Yellow Fever. They then settled that it was “a virus morphologically similar to Marburg virus, but immunologically distinct,” states the 1978 WHO Report.
They pulled samples from bedbugs, rats, bats, and other creatures that come into contact with humans. But there was no Ebola to study.
Meanwhile, Ebola virus antibodies were found in five persons who were not ill and had not had contact with the ” infected ” villages or the Yambuku hospital during the epidemic. “If these findings can be confirmed by an independent method of testing, they would suggest that the virus is, in fact, endemic to the region and should lead to further effort to uncover a viral reservoir in Zaire.”
But, to my knowledge, this was not — and has not — been proven.
Ebola: Troubling Facts And Preferential Treatments
Between September 1st and October 24th, 1976, 318 cases of acute viral hemorrhagic fever occurred in northern Zaire. There were 280 deaths and only 38 serologically confirmed survivors.
According to lore, literally hundreds of people were involved in the hunt for the virus’s origin. In the end, the hunt cost more than $1 Million USD. But even with all this money and all these workers, the story of Ebola’s genesis is riddled with holes and inconsistencies.
Given all the personnel deaths, it didn’t take long for the Yambuku Mission Hospital to become nonfunctional. Interestingly, almost all subsequent cases of Ebola either received injections at the hospital or had been in close contact with another person who had Ebola. Most of these cases occurred during the first four weeks of the epidemic. Thereafter, the hospital was closed, with 11 of the 17 staff members dying from the disease.
Garett writes (in passing) that four of the sisters who initially died had been recently vaccinated. With What? Isn’t this worthy of more exploration? We don’t know for certain, although it’s likely it was for hemorrhagic fever. This also raises an eyebrow because, in many instances, the narrative is inverted like a dirty pair of underwear on an extended road trip. The unvaccinated are described as threats when in reality, it’s the vaccinated people who shed and are highly infectious.
The Wrong Vaccine?
The first Belgian nun, a midwife, became ill on September 14th and died on the 19th, 1976. It is possible that if the wrong vaccine was administered it could contribute to infectiousness or result in death. For instance, Nurse M.N received the Marburg plasma intravenously and died four days later, on October 20th.
In a third account I found this:
A hospital-based outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) occurred in Kinshasa, capital of Zaire, following the arrival of a sick nursing sister from the northern epidemic area. Her traveling companion, and a Kinshasa nurse who cared for her after her arrival in Kinshasa, also became ill and all three patients died after an illness lasting 7 to 8 days. The illness was characterized by fever, headache, myalgia, diarrhea, vomiting and later on a morbilliform rash, sore throat and hemorrhagic phenomena.
“It was a ‘little bit dicey to point to four Catholic missionaries,” writes The Coming Plague.
Zero Safety Measures
There is also a question of cross-contamination and sanitation. Or the lack thereof.
Reportedly:
Only Five syringes and needles were issued to the nursing staff each morning for use at the outpatient department, the prenatal clinic, and the inpatient wards. These syringes and needles were apparently not sterilized between their use on different patients but merely rinsed in a pan of warm water. Sometimes they were boiled at the end of the day. The surgical theatre had its own ample supply of instruments, syringes, and needles, which were kept separately and autoclaved after use.
Some of the mercenaries in the villages had recently returned after extensive traveling. Read: lots of contact with foreign bacteria or pathogens.
Finally, virological studies were limited. The only clinical laboratory test done on patients admitted to Yambuku Hospital was urinary protein. This was reported as uniformly positive and was used as a major diagnostic criterion by the nursing sisters early in the epidemic.
In fact “suspected cases were not closely examined, but medicines were still administered and arrangements were made for their isolation in the village. This stems from a report from the 1978 WHO Bulletin.
Zero Protocol And Preferential Measures
Even when there was no confirmation of the Ebola virus, patients were treated with antimalarial drugs, aspirin, antibiotics, and antipyretics to exclude other diseases common to the area.
At least three of the sisters were also given an assortment of arguably experimental treatments. Read more here.
Isn’t it odd then that when on November 5th, 1976, Geoffrey Platt, a lab tech at the former Microbiological Research Establishment in Porton Down in Wiltshire accidentally jabbed his thumb while taking a sample from an Ebola-infected guinea pig, his treatment bore no resemblance to the Zaire locals. He was treated with human interferon & convalescent serum. The course of his disease was mild & he fully recovered.
Incidentally, the Porton Down military installation was founded in 1916 and is the oldest chemical warfare facility in the world. It wasn’t until the 1960s that the government admitted the existence of the 7,000-acre site near Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Writing On The Wall: Whistleblower From the Mediterranean Sea
A few weeks after I started reading Garrett’s The Coming Plague, I came in contact with X, a journalist-turned-vaccine-whistleblower who didn’t want to use her name. She has been covering viral outbreaks for more than a decade. She has written about impending “Global Medical Martial” while shedding light on a litany of vaccine safety issues, including the World Health Organization’s (WHO)’s fraud, abuse, corruption, and mismanagement.
“We don’t have Ebola, it came out of a lab – I mean if you look at who developed these vaccines, they’re always are labs involved and the first Ebola outbreak […] the people who got Ebola in Zaire, Congo in 1976, were people who took a vaccine.”
Framed in this way… we observe a twist in the reported story.
“African In Origin”
According to X, officials eventually sent a military attaché, a commander colonel and the epidemiologist of the government” to the region. His name was Jean-Jacques Muyembe and he was appointed to investigate what they would soon call “Ebola.”
Those who investigated Ebola included Jean-Jacques Muyembe, a tropical disease expert who studied in Belgium alongside Peter Piot, now well-known biological weapons and tropical disease expert. At the time of the first Ebola virus outbreak, he was only 27 years old.
Sukato Mandzomba, a member of the medical staff was the only employee who survived the infection and illness, writes Garret. Nature mentioned her in a 2017 piece titled Ebola survivors still immune to the virus after 40 years.
The official explanation is that Ebola came from somebody who was infected. Nurses in the hospital didn’t sterilize the needle and that caused the spread of the infection. On the surface, this sounds like a reasonable explanation. But, it doesn’t make sense in the context of the broad picture.
“Placed” Into Circulation
What if the virus was deliberately put into circulation, wonders X. “A thorough examination reveals the inklings of ulterior motives.”
In conclusion, the WHO itself stated that limited ecological investigations were done since the epidemiology of the outbreak “strongly suggested that the virus had been imported into the Bumba Zone.”
Back in 1978, the WHO conceded that much-desired information was never obtained. And that the means by which the virus was introduced cannot be confirmed.
As in the case of Marburg viruses, the source of Ebola virus is completely unknown beyond the simple fact that it is “African in origin.”
On October 27th an official account was given to disseminate to ‘press corps’. The findings were “conservatively designed to cast a sense of routine around a crisis,” writes Garett.
Even today consider that the timeline and origins of this virus remain fuzzy.
Part 2 Coming Soon: African Plague Reaches Beyond
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Maryam Henein is an investigative journalist, functional medicine consultant, and founder and editor-in-chief of HoneyColony . She is also the director of the award-winning documentary film Vanishing of the Bees, narrated by Ellen Page. She is currently being shadowbanned. Please follower her on Twitter