vaxxter--2020-12-28--Coronavirus Pt. 6: The COVID Vaccines – part 1

In December 2020 , the first vaccines for coronavirus disease were granted an EUA – Emergency Use Authorization – by the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) and recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ( ACIP ) .
Vaccine administration began immediately .
Were you first in line ?
I hope you were not , and no one you care about was either .
What We Know About the COVID Vaccines According to the Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker , as of Dec. 26 , 2020 , 83 vaccines are in Phase 1 , 2 or 3 human and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the final stages of testing .
Never before have so many companies tested so many different vaccines , against the same virus , at the same time .
Of those in the trials , five vaccines are now early use , with three vaccines approved for clinical use Pfizer , Moderna and AstraZeneca .
Here ’ s what we have been told , so far : Pfizer ’ s vaccine – given the tentative name Comirnaty – has been approved for persons 16 years of age and older .
The mRNA vaccine consists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 0.3cc ) given intramuscularly 21 days apart .
The vaccine must be stored at -94F ( -70C ) .
mRNA is an unstable molecule , which is why it needs to be wrapped in lipid nanoparticles for storage and transportation .
But the lipid nanoparticle is exquisitely sensitive to temperature ; hence the reason that the vaccine must be stored and transported at extraordinarily low temperatures .
The ingredients found in Pfizer ’ s vaccine include the following : Note that none of the ingredients are listed with milligrams dosage .
Look at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of these has ever been used in a previously approved vaccine .
Have they been tested for synergistic toxicity ?
Has there been stability testing for the breakdown of each ingredient when warmed to room temperature ?
And what about all those allergic reactions being reported ?
Have ANY of these chemicals been tested for allergic responses , in humans or even in animals ?
While Pfizer and the FDA have no idea if this vaccine will prevent infection or even if the antibodies will persist long-term , Pfizer expects to manufacture over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 2021 .
For more on how this vaccine works , go here .
Like Pfizer ’ s vaccine , Moderna ’ s vaccine also uses mRNA as its vehicle for inducing antibody responses to the spike protein .
Approved for those 18 years of age and older , the vaccine is given as two doses , ( 100 mcg in 0.5 cc intramuscular injection ) with the second dose given one month ( 28 days ) later , or as close to the recommended interval as possible .
This vaccine can be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( -20C ) temperatures .
Notably , the ingredients of this vaccine have not been released .
Are you willing to be injected with something unknown ?
For more on how this vaccine works , go here .
Either of the currently authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can be used when indicated ; ACIP does not state a product preference .
However , these two vaccines are not interchangeable and both doses of the series should be completed with the same product .
However , if two doses of different mRNA COVID-19 vaccine products @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Additional doses of either product are not recommended .
AstraZeneca ’ s AZD1222 coronavirus vaccine candidate , formerly known as ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , is made from a weakened version of a common cold virus , hence its original name .
While it can cause infection in chimpanzees , the virus was genetically changed so it can not reproduce/replicate in humans .
This vaccine candidate is of interest because the clinical studies , done in collaboration with the University of Oxford , were widely publicized as the first and most promising vaccine .
However @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported that all the vaccinated monkeys treated with the Oxford vaccine became infected when challenged .
Then , why did the company press forward with the renamed , AZD1222 vaccine candidate ?
Because even though the vaccine did not protect the animals from infection , it did moderate the disease .
Watch for this type of logic as the 80+ COVID vaccines try to make their way into the multi-trillion-dollar vaccine market .
But not to let all that research and money to go to waste , researchers now believe the shot will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emerging in Britain .
To find out more about how this vaccine works , to here .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a board-certified osteopathic medical doctor from Cleveland , Ohio .
Dr. Tenpenny is a practicing physician and cares for patients 2.5 days per week .
Dr. Tenpenny is an internationally known expert on the problems associated with vaccines .
Students from all over the world have become confident parents and articulate activists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Courses4Mastery.com .
As the “ Voice for the Health Freedom , ” Dr. Tenpenny is an outspoken advocate for free choice in healthcare , including the right to refuse vaccination .

by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABHIM
VAERS data sets for COVID Vaccine Injuries can be found, downloaded and searched here.
VAERS report of injuries as of Feb. 4, 2021: 563 deaths – 12,697 injuries
VAERS report of injuries, as of Feb. 18, 2021: 1095 deaths. – 19,907 injuries
VAERS report of injuries, as of March 19, 2021: 2050 deaths – 44,606 injuries
VAERS report of injuries, as of April 16, 2021: 3186 deaths – 86,080 injuries
VAERS report of injuries, as of May 7, 2021: 4057 deaths – 192,954 injuries
VAERS report of injuries, as of June 28, 2021: 6,985 deaths – 411,831 injuries
Part 2 here
In December 2020, the first vaccines for coronavirus disease were granted an EUA – Emergency Use Authorization – by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Vaccine administration began immediately. Were you first in line? I hope you were not, and I hope no one you care about ran to get this injection either.
This is not “just another vaccine” and this is not “just like getting a flu shot.” The ingredients are experimental and the mRNA is coded to produce a protein that CAN modify your genes.
What We Know About the COVID Vaccines
According to the Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker, as of Dec. 26, 2020, there are 83 – as of July 3, 2021, there are 94 vaccines are in Phase 1, 2 or 3 human and animal clinical trials, with 18 32 approaching the final stages of testing and at least 77 under active investigation in animals. Never before have so many companies tested so many different vaccines at the same time, against a virus that has not been isolated. Of those in the trials, five vaccines are now early use, with three vaccines approved for clinical use Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca. Here’s what we have been told, so far:
Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2)
Pfizer’s vaccine – given the tentative name Comirnaty – has been approved for persons 16 years of age and older. The mRNA vaccine consists of two doses (30mcg solution in 0.3cc) given intramuscularly 21 days apart. The vaccine must be stored at -94F (-70C). mRNA is an unstable molecule, which is why it needs to be wrapped in lipid nanoparticles for storage and transportation. But the lipid nanoparticle is exquisitely sensitive to temperature; hence the reason that the vaccine must be stored and transported at extraordinarily low temperatures.
The ingredients found in Pfizer’s vaccine include the following: (CDC, slide 21)
nucleoside-modified mRNA encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 Lipid: (4-hydroxybutyl) azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) Lipid: 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine. [DSPC ] Lipid: 2-[( polyethylene glycol )-2000]-N,N-ditetra-decylacetamide Lipid: cholesterol potassium chloride potassium dihydrogen phosphate sodium chloride disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate sucrose
Note that none of the ingredients are listed with milligrams dosage. Look at the first three excipients. Not one of these has ever been used in a previously approved vaccine. Have they been tested for synergistic toxicity? Has there been stability testing for the breakdown of each ingredient when warmed to room temperature? And what about all those allergic reactions being reported? Have ANY of these chemicals been tested for allergic responses, in humans or even in animals? Pfizer gives explicit instructions on how to mix and administer this injection. See the specific instructions here.
While Pfizer and the FDA have no idea if this vaccine will prevent infection or even if the antibodies will persist long-term, Pfizer expects to manufacture over 1.3 billion doses worldwide by the end of 2021. For more on how this vaccine works, go here.
Moderna (mRNA-1273)
Like Pfizer’s vaccine, Moderna’s vaccine also uses mRNA as its vehicle for inducing antibody responses to the spike protein. Approved for those 18 years of age and older, the vaccine is given in two doses, (100 mcg in 0.5 cc intramuscular injection) with the second dose given one month (28 days) later, or as close to the recommended interval as possible. This vaccine can be stored for up to six months at -4F (-20C) temperatures.
The ingredients in the Moderna vaccine have now been listed on the Moderna Fact Sheet for providers: Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is a white to off-white suspension for intramuscular injection to be injected 28 days apart. Each 0.5 mL dose of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine contains: (CDC, slide 21)
Messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding the pre-fusion stabilized Spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 virus, 100 mcg IMPORTANT: The Moderna patent states that another mRNA may be present that encodes for the protein, flagellin an unapproved vaccine adjuvant used to stimulate the pro-inflammatory Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) Lipid: PEG2000-DMG : 1,2-dimyristoly-rac-glycerol,methoxypolyethylene glycol Lipid: 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycro-3-phosphocholine Lipid: SM102 : This product is for research use – not for human or veterinary diagnostic or therapeutic use . Trade name: SM-102 in Chloroform (trichloromethane.) Suspected carcinogen Suspected to damage fertility; Known teratogen; developmental toxicity in the unborn child When exposed to light and/or air, converts to phosgene , a highly poisonous gas May cause anemia, cough, CNS depression, drowsiness, headache, heart damage, lassitude (weakness, exhaustion), liver damage, narcosis, reproductive effects, teratogenic effects. Lipid: cholesterol tromethamine tromethamine hydrochloride, 18 mg acetic acid, 0.42 mg sodium acetate, 0.12 mg sucrose, 43.5 mg
Are you willing to be injected with something unknown and never tested before in humans? For more on how this vaccine works, go here.
Buried deep inside the Moderna patent is a section that has been ignored by the media and is not mentioned on the Moderna provider fact sheet. The mRNA in the Moderna vaccine may be coded to transcribe a protein, flagellin, that is used to enhance the cytokine response of the macrophages.
Either of the currently authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can be used when indicated; ACIP does not state a product preference. However, these two vaccines are not interchangeable and both doses of the series should be completed with the same product. However, if two doses of different mRNA COVID-19 vaccine products are inadvertently administered, no worries! Additional doses of either product are not recommended.
Remember that both vaccines are completely protected from all liability by the 2005 PREP Act. So, if the nurse gives you the wrong shot, and you have a serious reaction, even death, there will be no repercussions for the nurse and no compensation for you.
One more candidate: AstraZeneca (AZD1222) (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19)
AstraZeneca’s AZD1222 coronavirus vaccine candidate, formerly known as ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, is made from a weakened version of a common cold virus, hence its original name. While it can cause infection in chimpanzees, the virus was genetically changed so it cannot reproduce/ replicate in humans.
The manufacturer released only a cursory list of ingredients, without including the microgram or milligram amount of each chemical. One 0.5cc injecting includes:
COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1-S* recombinant) 5 × 10^10 viral particles (vp) *This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs) Recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the SARS CoV 2 Spike (S) glycoprotein Genetically modified human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cell List of excipients – unknown amounts: L-Histidine L-Histidine hydrochloride monohydrate Magnesium chloride hexahydrate Polysorbate 80 Ethanol Sucrose Sodium chloride Disodium edetate dihydrate Water for injections
This vaccine candidate is of interest because the clinical studies, done in collaboration with the University of Oxford, were widely publicized as the first and most promising vaccine. However, in May 2020, it was reported that all the vaccinated monkeys treated with the Oxford vaccine became infected when challenged. Then, why did the company press forward with the renamed, AZD1222 vaccine candidate? Because even though the vaccine did not protect the animals from infection, it did moderate the disease. Watch for this type of logic as the 80+ COVID vaccines try to make their way into the multi-trillion-dollar vaccine market.
But not to let all that research and money go to waste, researchers now believe the shot will be effective against a new viral variant emerging in Britain. To find out more about how this vaccine works, to here.
For details on all of the current vaccines clinical trials, go to the Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker found here (subscription required to NYTimesOnline to view)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a board-certified osteopathic medical doctor from Cleveland, Ohio. Dr. Tenpenny is a practicing physician and cares for patients 2.5 days per week. Dr. Tenpenny is an internationally known expert on the problems associated with vaccines. Students from all over the world have become confident parents and articulate activists through her online educational courses, found at Courses4Mastery.com. As the “Voice for the Health Freedom,” Dr. Tenpenny is an outspoken advocate for free choice in healthcare, including the right to refuse vaccination.


vaxxter--2020-12-28--Did You Know? 9 Topics to Share

Did You Know? 9 Topics to Share

On December 8 , 2020 , the wheels of the Operation Warp Speed train began to slip off the rails .
The confidence game thrust upon the public by the global medical cartel , with fake news and false data emblazoned in every headline , has fallen short of convincing people to blindly step in line , roll up their sleeves , and take the shot .
Reports of foot blisters and Bell ’ s palsy—a form of facial paralysis—impacting some people who took the trial vaccines doesn ’ t bode well for DNA-altering vaccines that have never been experimented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In another ominous warning sign , the Pfizer COVID data recommends those who are allergic to the ingredients in the shots should avoid taking them .
Wow !
That is what tens of billions of dollars and years of research have produced , hyper fast-tracked in Operation Warp Speed ?
Strange and deadly adverse events ?
Why would anyone want to take a suspect 95 percent “ effective ” coronavirus vaccine for a weak virus when the survivability rate is greater than 99 percent ?
Add Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla admitting that he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine would stop the spread of the virus , and the question becomes : Why take the Pfizer vaccine if it doesn ’ t provide “ herd immunity ” to the general public ?
Herd immunity , you see , has been the holy grail of immunization that is used as a marketing ploy .
To make matters worse for Big Pharma vaccine promoters , the CEOs of Pfizer and Moderna , two of the leading COVID vaccine manufacturers , decided to politicize the premature success of their biologics , which are waiting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President Trump ’ s White House summit to update the American people , while leaking documents to the Biden camp in a plan to delay the full rollout of the vaccines until next April .
In other words , they robbed President Trump , the architect of Operation Warp Speed , of his glory in order to celebrate the achievement with Joe Biden , who has not yet been certified as the next president of the United States .
Wouldn ’ t it be ironic if President Trump overturns the election “ glitches @ @ @ @ @ @ @ second term ?
What would Pfizer and Moderna ’ s CEOs do then ?
Continue to politicize their life-saving vaccines ?
But doing that would only seed more doubt about the need and veracity for taking such an experimental vaccine .
For the first time in decades , questions about vaccine development are coming from experts outside the vaccine risk community .
Is there a toxin to cause sterility inserted into the vaccines ?
That question posed by Dr. Michael Yeadon , former vice president and chief scientific advisor at Pfizer .
Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He and colleague Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg , a German physician and epidemiologist , filed a joint petition to halt the COVID vaccine trials with the European Medicine Agency .
The petition calls for a “ stay of action ” in the phased human trials .
While the 43-page document made the rounds on the Web , more questions emerged related to the legitimacy of the vaccines , such as why the manufacturers withheld and obscured data , ingredients , and more robust information on adverse events .
The Masking of the Public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is fringe , extreme , or conspiratorial , the COVID shell game continues to hit more resistance among professionals and celebrities by challenging the hyped claims made by the vaccine-makers and health agencies .
But that hasn ’ t stopped the public health lobby from deploying all assets to shame , ridicule , condition , and incentivize people to take the vaccine for the benefit of society .
While Cornell University now offers race-based exemptions to this year ’ s flu shot .
Herd immunity for some , but not others ?
All @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media to broadcast virus fear porn and propaganda 24/7 .
They sic Big Tech to reinforce censorship to squash dissension .
They build a firewall around Communist China ’ s main role in the release of the virus to protect their financial interests .
And they leverage prejudice court systems to rule in favor of “ public health ” emergency orders over constitutional and common law rights .
By doing this , the courts are signaling to state legislatures to pass COVID vaccine mandates , while dividing people and grinding businesses into insolvency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collective will of the people and force them to submit , first with mask mandates , and then into taking the COVID vaccines .
From One COVID Lie to the Next For those who doubt the overarching plan of the cabal ’ s ‘ Great Reset , ’ remember the broken promises made by government caretakers who bulldozed everyone ’ s right to live free and earn a living .
For the record , President Trump never shut down the economy or locked down the country on a national level .
Do you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : • Lied about the effectiveness of masks • Lied about treatments other than vaccines The business shutdowns and shelter-in-place narratives were going to be temporary .
Remember ?
Those who spread the lies about the Plandemic , included the globalist health alliances in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , the World Health Organization ( WHO ) , Dr. Anthony Fauci , the World Economic Forum ( “ Forum ” ) , John Hopkins University ( JHU ) , the U.S. Centers for Disease Control ( CDC ) , and the Chinese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ others .
All of these key players participated in Event 201 , collaborated through the WHO ’ s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board , and continue to share the same talking points in order to force vaccinate everyone .
COVID-19 has been long-planned ; years in the making .
It ’ s a well thought out , covert operation that masks a global coup to enslave humanity and herd the sheep into a new gated , surveillance state economy .
It was always about control .
Now campaigns to subvert “ vaccine hesitancy , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in an effort to drown out COVID vaccine skepticism , have become more strident and fascist with calls from the Red Cross to fight vaccine “ fake news ” and punish the resistors .
But the flagging confidence in COVID immunizations isn ’ t confined to the general public .
Thousands of medical professionals want to take the COVID vaccine at all .
One would think that education of a “ safe and effective ” coronavirus vaccine would begin there .
But that is not the case .
Last month , 60 Minutes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
When the reporter asked Judith Persichilli , RN , New Jersey ’ s Commissioner of Public Health , about the challenges she faced in distributing the COVID vaccine , once available , she paused .
Then said in a statewide survey , Persichilli admitted 40 percent of the medical doctors and 60 percent of nurses and other medical staff take the COVID vaccine when approved .
Is the problem vaccine hesitancy or fake news ?
Or is the real issue the lack of education and transparency in rolling out vaccines for a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under 70 years old ?
Why should anyone trust the vaccine promoters and the Great Reset architects in which , by taking two doses of a COVID vaccine close apart , their lives would return to normal ?
The problem with the COVID immunization program lies within the health agencies and their media sycophants to share salient facts and tell clear truths about the pandemic .
It ’ s been an affront to people , professionals , and business owners who are learning the realities about the waning outbreak and its mild severity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are discovering , doesn ’ t feel right .
When human nature kicks in , people question the obvious , share information , and complain when the government rules and orders don ’ t align with the facts .
Still , far too many are asleep , thinking a second round of lockdowns based on false and misleading data is science .
Or that wearing masks and social distancing in December would work when practicing such methods last spring failed to slow the spread of the virus .
What can people do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the COVID-19 Plandemic .
Here ’ s a top nine list of “ Did You Know ” topics .
1 .
Did you know COVID the name of the virus ?
2 .
Did you know Masks don ’ t work ?
• If Masks work there would be in “ cases ” • in the lungs are on the rise 3 .
Did you know Lockdowns don ’ t work ?
• Lockdowns “ kill as many people as COVID ” – CDC 4 .
Did you know the CDC lumped @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counts season flu or other respiratory illnesses ?
• CDC counts all respiratory illnesses and viruses under COVID-19 umbrella • COVID-19 has “ no effect on deaths in the U.S. ” – CDC partner John Hopkins University study 5 .
Did you know the PCR tests are fraudulent ?
• PCR tests “ be used to diagnose viruses ” – inventor Kery Mullis • PCR tests pick up nano-fragments of other diseases , not only coronavirus 6 .
Did you know the COVID “ Cases ” numbers are a lie ?
• The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ false positives ” • Only 1 in 3 “ ” cause by COVID-19 • Only “ 6 % of deaths caused by .
” – CDC 7 .
Did you know you will need a Vaccine Passport to travel ?
• People will soon need COVID to travel • Employers could demand employees show proof of COVID vaccines to work • Businesses could demand patrons show proof of COVID vaccines to enter 8 .
Do you know what ’ s in COVID Vaccines ?
9 .
Do you know the outcome of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people over 71 years old tested Don ’ t let the architects of the Plandemic to determine your health and wellbeing .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist , covering subjects from autism , its cause and treatments , clean technology , green energy , and the BP Oil Spill , to business and Wall Street , and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain logistics in the Construction IT space .
James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area .
He is the author of Master Manipulator : The Explosive True Story of Fraud , Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC .

by James Grundvig, Investigative Reporter, Vaxxter Contributor
On December 8, 2020, the wheels of the Operation Warp Speed train began to slip off the rails. The confidence game thrust upon the public by the global medical cartel, with fake news and false data emblazoned in every headline, has fallen short of convincing people to blindly step in line, roll up their sleeves, and take the shot.
Reports of foot blisters and Bell’s palsy—a form of facial paralysis—impacting some people who took the trial vaccines doesn’t bode well for DNA-altering vaccines that have never been experimented on the human race until now. In another ominous warning sign, the Pfizer COVID data recommends those who are allergic to the ingredients in the shots should avoid taking them.
Wow! That is what tens of billions of dollars and years of research have produced, hyper fast-tracked in Operation Warp Speed? Strange and deadly adverse events?
Why would anyone want to take a suspect 95 percent “effective” coronavirus vaccine for a weak virus when the survivability rate is greater than 99 percent?
Add Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla admitting that he is “uncertain” whether the COVID vaccine would stop the spread of the virus, and the question becomes: Why take the Pfizer vaccine if it doesn’t provide “herd immunity” to the general public? Herd immunity, you see, has been the holy grail of immunization that is used as a marketing ploy.
To make matters worse for Big Pharma vaccine promoters, the CEOs of Pfizer and Moderna, two of the leading COVID vaccine manufacturers, decided to politicize the premature success of their biologics, which recently receive FDA approval. They stiffed President Trump’s White House summit to update the American people, while leaking documents to the Biden camp in a plan to delay the full rollout of the vaccines until next April. In other words, they robbed President Trump, the architect of Operation Warp Speed, of his glory in order to celebrate the achievement with Joe Biden, who has not yet been certified as the next president of the United States.
Wouldn’t it be ironic if President Trump overturns the election “glitches” and irregularities and transitions to a second term? What would Pfizer and Moderna’s CEOs do then? Continue to politicize their life-saving vaccines? But doing that would only seed more doubt about the need and veracity for taking such an experimental vaccine.
Imagine This Happening
For the first time in decades, questions about vaccine development are coming from experts outside the vaccine risk community.
Is there a toxin to cause sterility inserted into the vaccines? That question was posed by Dr. Michael Yeadon, former vice president and chief scientific advisor at Pfizer. Dr. Yeadon didn’t merely ask questions. He and colleague Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a German physician and epidemiologist, filed a joint petition to halt the COVID vaccine trials with the European Medicine Agency. The petition calls for a “stay of action” in the phased human trials.
While the 43-page document made the rounds on the Web, more questions emerged related to the legitimacy of the vaccines, such as why the manufacturers withheld and obscured data, ingredients, and more robust information on adverse events.
The Masking of the Public Health Crisis
In a year when nothing is fringe, extreme, or conspiratorial, the COVID shell game continues to hit more resistance among professionals and celebrities by challenging the hyped claims made by the vaccine-makers and health agencies.
But that hasn’t stopped the public health lobby from deploying all assets to shame, ridicule, condition, and incentivize people to take the vaccine for the benefit of society. While Cornell University now offers race-based exemptions to this year’s flu shot.
Herd immunity for some, but not others?
All assets mean the Pharma-State duopoly uses mainstream media to broadcast virus fear porn and propaganda 24/7. They sic Big Tech to reinforce censorship to squash dissension. They build a firewall around Communist China’s main role in the release of the virus to protect their financial interests. And they leverage prejudice court systems to rule in favor of “public health” emergency orders over constitutional and common law rights.
By doing this, the courts are signaling to state legislatures to pass COVID vaccine mandates, while dividing people and grinding businesses into insolvency. The plan is to break the collective will of the people and force them to submit, first with mask mandates, and then into taking the COVID vaccines.
From One COVID Lie to the Next
For those who doubt the overarching plan of the cabal’s ‘Great Reset,’ remember the broken promises made by government caretakers who bulldozed everyone’s right to live free and earn a living.
For the record, President Trump never shut down the economy or locked down the country on a national level.
Do you trust the public health authorities, who:
Lied about the Virus
Lied about viral loads
Lied about transmissibility
Lied about superspreaders
Lied about asymptomatic carriers
Lied about Lockdowns 1.0
Lied about the PCR tests
Lied about mortality rates
Lied about the effectiveness of masks
Lied about treatments other than vaccines
Lied about Lockdowns 2.0
The business shutdowns and shelter-in-place narratives were going to be temporary. Remember?
The Plandemic, Revisited
Those who spread the lies about the Plandemic, included the globalist health alliances in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr. Anthony Fauci, the World Economic Forum (“Forum”), John Hopkins University (JHU), the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), among others. All of these key players participated in Event 201, collaborated through the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, and continue to share the same talking points in order to force vaccinate everyone.
COVID-19 has been long-planned; years in the making. It’s a well thought out, covert operation that masks a global coup to enslave humanity and herd the sheep into a new gated, surveillance state economy. It was always about control.
Now campaigns to subvert “vaccine hesitancy,” driven by the WHO and CDC in an effort to drown out COVID vaccine skepticism, have become more strident and fascist with calls from the Red Cross to fight vaccine “fake news” and punish the resisters. But the flagging confidence in COVID immunizations isn’t confined to the general public. Thousands of medical professionals do not want to take the COVID vaccine at all. One would think that education of a “safe and effective” coronavirus vaccine would begin there. But that is not the case.
Last month, 60 Minutes aired a segment on Operation Warp Speed. When the reporter asked Judith Persichilli, RN, New Jersey’s Commissioner of Public Health, about the challenges she faced in distributing the COVID vaccine, once available, she paused. Then said in a statewide survey, Persichilli admitted 40 percent of the medical doctors and 60 percent of nurses and other medical staff will not take the COVID vaccine when approved.
Is the problem vaccine hesitancy or fake news? Or is the real issue the lack of education and transparency in rolling out vaccines for a weak virus that rarely kills healthy people under 70 years old?
Why should anyone trust the vaccine promoters and the Great Reset architects in which, by taking two doses of a COVID vaccine close apart, their lives would return to normal?
It’s bogus; a disingenuous lie.
COVID Great Awakening
The problem with the COVID immunization program lies within the health agencies and their media sycophants to share salient facts and tell clear truths about the pandemic. It’s been an affront to people, professionals, and business owners who are learning the realities about the waning outbreak and its mild severity on their own.
The news, they are discovering, doesn’t feel right. When human nature kicks in, people question the obvious, share information, and complain when the government rules and orders don’t align with the facts.
Still, far too many are asleep, thinking a second round of lockdowns based on false and misleading data is science. Or that wearing masks and social distancing in December would work when practicing such methods last spring failed to slow the spread of the virus.
What can people do? They need to learn the basics about the COVID-19 Plandemic.
Here’s a top nine list of “Did You Know” topics.
1. Did you know COVID isn’t the name of the virus?
The virus is named SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19 means: “Certificate of Vaccine Identification”
19 means: A-I or “artificial intelligence”
2. Did you know Masks don’t work?
If Masks work there would be no rise in “cases”
in “cases” Masks don’t stop the spread of nano-size particles
stop the spread of nano-size particles Masks negatively impact breathing:
– Breathe in 20% less oxygen
– Rebreathe 400 times lung waste
Bacterial infections in the lungs are on the rise
3. Did you know Lockdowns don’t work?
4. Did you know the CDC lumped the Flu with COVID statistics?
CDC no longer counts seasonal flu or other respiratory illnesses?
counts seasonal flu or other respiratory illnesses? CDC counts all respiratory illnesses and viruses under COVID-19 umbrella
COVID-19 has “ no effect on deaths in the U.S.
5. Did you know the PCR tests are fraudulent?
PCR tests “ should not
PCR tests are inaccurate
PCR tests pick up nano-fragments of other diseases, not only coronavirus
PRC tests produce 50% wrong data
– 30% false positives
– 20% false negatives
6. Did you know the COVID “Cases” numbers are a lie?
The world is now suffering a Pandemic of “false positives”
Only 1 in 3 “ excess deaths
Only “6% of deaths caused by COVID-19 alone
7. Did you know you will need a Vaccine Passport to travel?
People will soon need COVID Vaccine Passports
Employers could demand employees show proof of COVID vaccines to work
Businesses could demand patrons show proof of COVID vaccines to enter
8. Do you know what’s in COVID Vaccines?
Lung cells of 14-week-old white male fetuses
Ingredients are being withheld
Might cause sterility
Nanobots
Injectable biosensors
9. Do you know the outcome of COVID Vaccine trials?
100% side effects
Death in some patients
No unhealthy people tested
No elderly people over 71 years old tested
Don’t let the architects of the Plandemic determine the fate of your health and wellbeing.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 22828
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
James Grundvig has written and published as a freelance journalist and columnist, covering subjects from autism, its cause and treatments, clean technology, green energy, and the BP Oil Spill, to business and Wall Street, and completed investigative reports on a wide range of topics since 2005. He is the founder of the cloud-based software startup in 2011 to integrate supply chain logistics in the Construction IT space. James has 25 years of consulting engineering and construction management experience on projects of scale and complexity in the New York City area. He is the author of Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement and the Government Betrayal at the CDC.


vaxxter--2020-12-28--Coronavirus Pt. 6: The COVID Vaccines – part 2 – UPDATED

When the coronavirus vaccine is injected , the mRNA contains “ instructions ” for building the spike protein that has been identified on the surface of the SARS-CoV2 virus .
The cell ’ s reverse transcriptase enzymes are called into action , leading to the mass production of the spike ( S ) protein , the protein thought to play a vital role in its infectivity .
However , is this a good thing ?
The 2019 study by Liu , Li et al , “ Anti-spike IgG antibody causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time to read and study .
The investigation was undertaken to study the effect vaccine-induced , spike-protein antibodies have on preventing SARS-CoV infections and to examine the possible effect the spike-protein antibodies have on the immune system .
What the researchers discovered was startling .
Sixteen macaque monkeys were given two injections ; half of the animals received a modified vaccinia virus with an inserted spike protein ( ADS-MVA ) or a control vaccine made with a modified vaccinia virus without the spike protein antigen ( ADC-MVA ) .
Three healthy , non-vaccinated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The animals were sacrificed between weeks 9 and 21 , after receiving the second injection ; the vaccine containing the spike protein induced very high antibody responses to the spike protein ( anti-S-IgG ) .
Although the antibodies had reduced the viral load in the upper respiratory tract , they caused a serious , antibody-enhanced injury in the lungs .
In fact , there was a direct and positive correlation between the level of antibody in serum and the degree of lung injury .
The tissues had evidence of diffuse alveolar damage ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exudate ( pus-like fluid ) and hemorrhage ( bleeding ) .
Even more , the lungs were large filled with large quantities of macrophages ( pus ) that had been weakened and inactivated .
• We present evidence of a detrimental role of the anti-S-IgG ( anti-spike protein antibody ) and acute lung injury during a SARS-CoV infection .
• Anti-S-IgG antibody failed to prevent SARS-CoV lower respiratory tract infection and amplified macrophage infiltration and accumulation in the lungs .
• We have determined that anti-S-IgG causes severe acute lung injury ( ALI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ skewing ( removing ) the inflammation-resolving work of the M2 macrophages .
• Animals who died of SARS-CoV infection had an accumulation of pro-inflammatory macrophages ( M1 ) and an absence of wound-healing macrophages ( M2 ) in their lungs .
• Histological examination [ the lung tissue of the sacrificed animals ] in 6 of the vaccinated macaques revealed acute DAD ( Diffuse Alveolar Damage ) with various degrees of severity .
Most of the macaques in the control group [ non-spike protein vaccine ] showed only minor to moderate lung inflammation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lungs within two days of infection without the presence of the anti-S-IgG antibodies The above study was very recent ( 2019 ) but is it one of MANY dating back to 2002 documenting how damaging the COVID vaccine ( s ) are going to be once a person is vaccinated and then is re-exposed to circulating coronaviruses .
But that ’ s not the only problem caused by the COVID-19 vaccines .
Most garden-variety respiratory viruses cause infection by binding to specific receptors on the surface of the host ’ s cells .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ from previous infections or by vaccines bind the circulating virus and neutralize it .
This stops , or at least weakens , the progression to a full-blown infection .
However , in some viruses , the antibodies formed against them bind only loosely to the viral surface proteins .
Instead of stopping an infection , this mechanism promotes invasion into the cell , enhancing the infection instead of stopping it .
A neutralizing antibody is shaped like the letter Y .
The upper arms are called the Fab fragments and the stem is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fragments bind to an invading pathogen .
The Fac fragment then binds to an Fac receptor on the surface of white blood cells , such as macrophages , lymphocytes , natural killer ( NK ) cells and others .
Normally , this signals the white blood to release tiny bits of inflammatory chemicals to destroy the microbes However , when the spike protein antibody ( anti-S-IgG ) engages with the Fac receptor on the surface of the cytomembrane , the “ door opens ” and allows the complex to enter host cells .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the antibody are only weakly bound to the surface of the pathogenic protein , the antibody acts like a Trojan horse .
The loosely bound protein material “ escapes ” from the end of the Fab fragments , it highjacks that reverse transcriptase enzyme system and begins to replicate , enhancing the infection rather than stopping it .
This is the process of how antibody derived enhancement , or ADE , works .
It ’ s like having an “ on button ” on a replicator but no “ off button.
” As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ non-neutralizing antibody is produced , leading to accelerated autoimmune diseases , primarily affecting the lungs , liver and kidneys .
ADE may even plan a role in the development of fulminant ARDS ( Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ) after patients have recovered from COVID .
ADE has been identified in more than 40 kinds of viruses including HIV , Dengue , West Nile and coronaviruses .
There are seven or the 36 circulating coronavirus strains ( LINK ) are known to infect humans .
In a 2012 study of mice , ferrets , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ various coronavirus proteins and various adjuvants , researchers reported immunopathology in every animal that had been vaccinated and then re-exposed to a SARS-CoV virus .
Researchers clearly stated the following : This combined experience provides concern for trials with SARS-CoV vaccines in humans .
Clinical trials with SARS coronavirus vaccines have been conducted and reported to induce antibody responses and to be ‘ ‘ safe.
” However , the evidence for safety is for a short period of observation .
The concern arising from the present report is for an immunopathologic reaction occurring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposure to infectious SARS-CoV , the basis for developing a vaccine for SARS .
The SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody protection against infection with SARS-CoV .
However , [ viral ] challenge of the mice given any of the vaccines led to the occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components .
Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccines in humans is indicated .
We know so little about the COVID vaccines .
• Does the vaccine prevent the infection or only lessen a patient ’ s symptoms ?
• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus ?
If so , why do we still need to distance and wear a mask ?
• How long will the antibody last ?
In otherwords , how long to we have to worry about viral re-exposure ?
• What if you already have a co-morbidity such as an autoimmune disease ?
• How well does it protect the elderly , many of whom have received a flu vaccine ?
We are only a few weeks into this mass global vaccination campaign , and thousands of side effects are already being reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is avoiding an infection with a 99 % survival rate , worth the risk of the vaccine ?
My vote will be unequivocally no .
1-5-2020 : UPDATE : In less than 1 month and with 1M doses delivered , the latest data from the Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) shows there have now been 40,433 adverse events REPORTED from the Covid19 vaccinations in the USA….AND THERE MAY BE THOUSANDS MORE UNREPORTED Look at the list of side effects : HERE Like what you ’ re reading on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ friends .
Help us grow .
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a board-certified osteopathic medical doctor from Cleveland , Ohio .
Dr. Tenpenny is a practicing physician and cares for patients 2.5 days per week .
Dr. Tenpenny is an internationally known expert on the problems associated with vaccines .
Students from all over the world have become confident parents and articulate activists through her online educational courses , found at Courses4Mastery.com .
As the “ Voice for the Health Freedom , ” Dr. Tenpenny is an outspoken advocate for free choice in healthcare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

by Dr Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
Part 1 here
Vaccine-induced Spike Antibodies: Havoc on the Lungs
When the coronavirus vaccine is injected, the mRNA contains “instructions” for building the spike protein that has been identified on the surface of the SARS-CoV2 virus. The cell’s reverse transcriptase enzymes are called into action, leading to the mass production of the spike (S) protein, the protein thought to play a vital role in its infectivity.
However, is this a good thing?
The 2019 study by Liu, Li et al, “Anti-spike IgG antibody causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute SARS-CoV infection” is worthy of your time to read and study.
The investigation was undertaken to study the effect vaccine-induced, spike-protein antibodies have on preventing SARS-CoV infections and to examine the possible effect the spike-protein antibodies have on the immune system.
What the researchers discovered was startling.
Sixteen macaque monkeys were given two injections; half of the animals received a modified vaccinia virus with an inserted spike protein (ADS-MVA) or a control vaccine made with a modified vaccinia virus without the spike protein antigen (ADC-MVA). Three healthy, non-vaccinated monkeys were included as additional controls.
The animals were sacrificed between weeks 9 and 21, after receiving the second injection; the vaccine containing the spike protein induced very high antibody responses to the spike protein (anti-S-IgG). Although the antibodies had reduced the viral load in the upper respiratory tract, they caused a serious, antibody-enhanced injury in the lungs. In fact, there was a direct and positive correlation between the level of antibody in serum and the degree of lung injury. The tissues had evidence of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), with various degrees of exudate (pus-like fluid) and hemorrhage (bleeding).
Even more, the lungs were large filled with large quantities of macrophages (pus) that had been weakened and inactivated.
Macrophages are a type of white blood cell that engulf, digest and eliminate microbes and foreign proteins through a process called phagocytosis. There are two primary types of macrophages. The M1 cells kill pathogens by secreting pro-inflammatory mediators and the M2 cells, which have an anti-inflammatory function and regulate wound healing. Antibodies formed against the SARS-CoV spike protein binds to the surface of M2 macrophages and weaken their function, allowing the M1 macrophages to release unchecked quantities cytokines. Instead of healing and repairing the infected lung tissues, the anti-S-IgG antibodies stifle the M2 cells and promote M1-caused inflammation. The results are a disaster.
A Summary of The Study’s Findings:
We present evidence of a detrimental role of the anti-S-IgG (anti-spike protein antibody) and acute lung injury during a SARS-CoV infection. Vaccine-induced, spike-specific antibodies resulted in severe acute lung injury in SARS-CoV infected Chinese macaques
Anti-S-IgG antibody failed to prevent SARS-CoV lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia) and amplify (increase) M1 macrophage infiltration and accumulation in the lungs.
Anti-S-IgG causes severe acute lung injury (ALI) when the lungs become re-infected and/or re-exposed to coronaviruses by removing the inflammation-resolving work of the M2 macrophages.
Animals who died of SARS-CoV infection had an accumulation of pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages and an absence of wound-healing M2 macrophages in their lungs.
Histological examination [the lung tissue of the sacrificed animals] in 6 of the vaccinated macaques revealed acute diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) with various degrees of severity. Most of the macaques in the control group given the non-spike protein vaccine showed only minor to moderate lung inflammation. ( Note: alveoli are the tiny air sacs in the lungs that oxygenate the blood.)
with various degrees of severity. Most of the macaques in the control group given the non-spike protein vaccine showed only minor to moderate lung inflammation. ( alveoli are the tiny air sacs in the lungs that oxygenate the blood.) Without the presence of the anti-S-IgG antibodies, M2 macrophages began healing the lungs within two days of infection.
Evidence Ignored
The above study was very recent (2019) but is it one of MANY dating back to 2002 documenting how damaging the COVID vaccine(s) are going to be once a person is vaccinated and then is re-exposed to circulating coronaviruses.
But that’s not the only problem caused by the COVID-19 vaccines.
Most garden-variety respiratory viruses cause infection by binding to specific receptors on the surface of the host’s cells. To block this attachment, antibodies formed from previous infections or by vaccines bind the circulating virus and neutralize it. This stops, or at least weakens, the progression to a full-blown infection.
However, in some viruses, the antibodies formed against them bind only loosely to the viral surface proteins. Instead of stopping an infection, this mechanism promotes invasion into the cell, enhancing the infection instead of stopping it.
Antibodies: Neutralizing vs Non-Neutralizing
A neutralizing antibody is shaped like the letter Y. The upper arms are called the Fab fragments and the stem is called the Fc fragment. The Fab fragments bind to an invading pathogen. The Fac fragment then binds to an Fac receptor on the surface of white blood cells, such as macrophages, lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells and others. Normally, this signals the white blood to release tiny bits of inflammatory chemicals to destroy the microbes
However, when the spike protein antibody (anti-S-IgG) engages with the Fac receptor on the surface of the cytomembrane, the “door opens” and allows the complex to enter host cells. And, if the Fab fragments of the antibody are only weakly bound to the surface of the pathogenic protein, the antibody acts like a Trojan horse. The loosely bound protein material “escapes” from the end of the Fab fragments, it highjacks that reverse transcriptase enzyme system and begins to replicate, enhancing the infection rather than stopping it.
This is the process of how antibody derived enhancement, or ADE, works. It’s like having an “on button” on a replicator but no “off button.” As the mRNA replicates, more and more non-neutralizing antibody is produced, leading to accelerated autoimmune diseases, primarily affecting the lungs, liver and kidneys. ADE may even plan a role in the development of fulminant ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) after patients have recovered from COVID.
ADE has been identified in more than 40 kinds of viruses including HIV, Dengue, West Nile and coronaviruses. There are seven or the 36 circulating coronavirus strains (LINK) are known to infect humans.
Every Animal Tested
In a 2012 study of mice, ferrets, hamsters, and Cynomolgus monkeys, using various coronavirus proteins and various adjuvants, researchers reported immunopathology in every animal that had been vaccinated and then re-exposed to a SARS-CoV virus.
Researchers clearly stated the following:
This combined experience provides concern for trials with SARS-CoV vaccines in humans. Clinical trials with SARS coronavirus vaccines have been conducted and reported to induce antibody responses and to be ‘‘safe.” However, the evidence for safety is for a short period of observation. The concern arising from the present report is for an immunopathologic reaction occurring among vaccinated individuals on (re)exposure to infectious SARS-CoV, the basis for developing a vaccine for SARS.
Researchers concluded the following:
The SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, [viral] challenge of the mice given any of the vaccines led to the occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccines in humans is indicated.
Unanswered questions
We know so little about the COVID vaccines.
Does the vaccine prevent the infection or only lessen a patient’s symptoms?
Does it keep them from spreading the virus? If so, why do we still need to distance and wear a mask?
How long will the antibody last? In otherwords, how long to we have to worry about viral re-exposure?
What if you already have a co-morbidity such as an autoimmune disease?
How well does it protect the elderly, many of whom have received a flu vaccine?
We are only a few weeks into this mass global vaccination campaign, and thousands of side effects are already being reported.
With all the evidence being ignored, is avoiding an infection with a 99% survival rate, worth the risk of the vaccine?
My vote will be unequivocally no.
1-5-2021: UPDATE: In less than 1 month and with 1M doses delivered, the latest data from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) shows there have now been 40,433 adverse events REPORTED from the Covid19 vaccinations in the USA….AND THERE MAY BE THOUSANDS MORE UNREPORTED
Look at the list of side effects: HERE
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a board-certified osteopathic medical doctor from Cleveland, Ohio. Dr. Tenpenny is a practicing physician and cares for patients 2.5 days per week. Dr. Tenpenny is an internationally known expert on the problems associated with vaccines. Students from all over the world have become confident parents and articulate activists through her online educational courses, found at Courses4Mastery.com. As the “Voice for the Health Freedom,” Dr. Tenpenny is an outspoken advocate for free choice in healthcare, including the right to refuse vaccination.


vaxxter--2020-01-31--Ebola: Ignoring Nutrition and Playing Politics

I am in firm agreement with Jon Rappoport : As news consumers , we continually bombarded with sensationalism , encouraging fear , stress , and illness .
And all the while , stories of the latest virus , or flu , or supposed pandemic , can discourage us from being healthy and understanding how easy it is to be well .
Despite coronavirus talk on the front burner , I have been asked to review the topic of Ebola – which has been bubbling off and on for 40 years in Africa .
Though we are told that the epicenter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Democratic Republic of the Congo ( formerly Zaire ) , a place over 7,500 miles from significant policymakers in the CDC headquarters in Atlanta , and the Pentagon in Washington , there are larger issues and more persistent themes implicated .
If nothing else , we should focus on maintaining our health through nutrition and hygiene , and remain steadfast in our resolve to resist plans to expand wars into sub-Saharan Africa .
What Are They ( not ) Saying ?
There are three general themes with Ebola news .
( 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; ( 2 ) backward and ignorant savages in Africa can not be trusted to quell this global health threat ; and ( 3 ) wonderful scientists from Europe , Canada , and the United States are battling , day and night , to create life-saving medicines and vaccines … that will be ready … any day now .
nd now , for the rest of the story Of course , there is a back story about Ebola in Africa .
When considering geopolitical moves , you should know that Africa is increasingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ China , the world ’ s number one petroleum importer , is cementing its grip on mining rights , access to African oil , and other resources through mutually beneficial relations that include building roads , railway systems , hospitals , and schools .
And some Chinese factories just happen to operate in the Eastern Congo – where Ebola is .
Those details are omitted in the latest chapter of the Ebola Chronicles .
According to the WHO ( 2019 ) , The WHO says that EVD first appeared in 1976 in South @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Congo ( DRC ) .
The current ( 2018-2019 ) outbreak is centered in eastern DRC ( WHO 2019 ) .
Within the same factsheet , agents at the WHO claim that EVD has a unique cause , but the symptoms look oddly familiar .
Initial stages of the disease are marked by fever , fatigue , headache , and sore throat .
As one gets sicker , the symptoms progress to vomiting , diarrhea , rash , impaired kidney and liver function , internal and external bleeding .
Noting that these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ care providers on the ground in Africa , the WHO ( 2019 ) says : This declaration , that Ebola-virus disease presents with nearly the same symptoms as malaria , typhoid , and meningitis should give us a clue about what the allopaths believe – and what approaches they will continue to take .
Remember , they claim that Ebola is a deadly disease , supposedly due to virus , that just sprang up – out of nowhere – 40 years ago .
And though they have never cured anyone , they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chemical combinations ( a patented drug ) and or experimental vaccine .
What is Happening on the Ground ?
The WHO is sending out press releases , and copy-ready stories announcing that Ebola is a health crisis .
“ Since 2018 , Ebola virus disease in spreading the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo ( DRC ) .
By September 2019 , [ nearly ] 3,000 cases and 2,000 deaths had been reported [ by WHO field offices ] .
” Cited in Lucey ( 2019 ) .
And we are all supposed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ epidemics : locals in the DRC are backward , ignorant , and do not trust science .
According to Hamadou Boiro , the World Health Organization ’ s social anthropologists team leader , Ebola persists in the northeast of the DRC “ because there are some in [ the ] community who refuse to believe that Ebola exists and refuse to seek treatment.
” Otto ( 2020 ) adds some information to assist our appreciation of Congolese people as maniacal , conspiracy theorists : “ In December 2018 , a politician told his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the ruling-Government as an excuse for annulling the presidential vote in the Ebola-stricken areas ” ; and “ In 2019 , WHO recorded around 390 attacks on health care facilities .
The attacks killed 11 and injured 83 health workers.
” With such vocal and violent opposition , one might find it easier to leave the Africans to their fate .
But recall the lesson from Rahm Emmanuel , ‘ you never want a serious crisis go to waste.
’ Recently the government of Canada has announced its incursion to help Africans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minister of International Development , explained that Canada is allocating $ 45 million CAD to trusted humanitarian partners working in the Democratic Republic of Congo to respond to Ebola-specific and other humanitarian needs .
Activities will include providing : “ Health services … logistics and coordination support , such as air services , to improve the… ability to prevent , detect and respond to outbreaks [ in the DRC and neighboring countries ] ; and training for community health workers and immunization campaign.
” And part of Plan Canada will be local PR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ release from Global Affairs Canada ( 2020 ) , nearly $ 1 million CAD will pay for a Peace and Stabilization Operations Program in the region of Nord-Kivu .
“ Project activities will include the creation of communications tools to educate communities on Ebola in order to avoid misinformation and myths about the disease.
” But how should peoples of the Congo and the world be educated about Ebola ?
Should the Africans know that western medicine has never helped ?
“ Although the first Ebola outbreaks were recognized in DRC and Sudan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an effective treatment.
” ( emphasis added ) .
According to the WHO factsheet ( 2019 ) , ( 1 ) Vaccines to protect against Ebola are under development and have been used [ sic ] to control [ sic ] the spread of Ebola in Guinea and in the DRC .
( 2 ) Early supportive care with rehydration … improves survival .
There is no licensed treatment proven to neutralize the virus but … immunological and drug therapies are under development .
So now we are back to square one .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ told that Ebola looks like other viral infections ( malaria , typhoid , and meningitis ) – those which have been conquered [ sic ] with vaccines and pharmaceutical drugs .
But we also see glaring admissions that , none of their pseudo-science , mumbo jumbo has ever worked to prevent or cure Ebola .
And how could we expect allopathic interventions to heal Ebola infections when those same protocols have not prevented or cured the other three ?
Consider , typhoid fever , supposedly caused by the ever-present salmonella typhi bacteria , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in relation to mass smallpox vaccination campaigns .
Each year , there are outbreaks of meningitis among vaccinated university students in the United States .
Lastly , the Gates Foundation has been telling us , for years , that a malaria vaccine is just around the corner .
The WHO factsheet from May 2019 offered the following : “ An experimental Ebola vaccine proved highly protective [ sic ] against EVD in a major trial in Guinea in 2015 .
The vaccine , rVSV-ZEBOV , was [ used ] in a trial involving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who received the vaccine , no Ebola cases were recorded , 10 days or more after vaccination .
In comparison , there were 23 cases , 10 days or more after vaccination [ sic ] among those who did not receive the vaccine.
” They add that the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine is being used in the ongoing Ebola outbreak in DRC that started in 2018 .
A Second Look at Merck ’ s Trial In December 2016 , the Lancet reported on the rVSV-ZEBOV trial from West Africa .
The lead author , Ana @ @ @ @ @ @ @ working at institutes and universities from the U.S , Canada , South Africa , Belgium , Germany , and the UK declared that the vaccine was 100 % effective in preventing Ebola outbreaks .
Putting aside their CDC-esque data manipulations , and just looking at the reported data , we see that Henao-Restrepo et al .
( 2016 ) and their Merck funders , did not find provide any salvation for poor and malnourished Africans .
Once we scratch the surface , we see that : • some of the vaccinated had acute @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than Ebola disease itself ; • some of the vaccinated actually fell ill with Ebola , and most significantly , • for two of the three vaccinated groups , Ebola rates were higher than ( i ) that of the general population ; and ( ii ) that of other non-vaccinated groups in the study .
The trial took people from the nations of Guinea and Sierra Leone .
After finding their eligible subjects , the researchers divided them into three categories : • ( A ) randomly chosen , and ready to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ B ) randomly chosen , and ready to receive the vaccine – but to be injected 21 days later ; and • ( C ) not randomly chosen , but ready to receive the vaccine immediately .
Groups A and C were further divided into two parts : those who received the vaccine ; and those who did not .
Group B was whittled down through withdrawn consent , illness , and pregnancy .
Thus , from the perspective of the authors , there were five groups – three of whom received the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I call the former A1 , B , and C1 , and the latter A2 and C2 .
( As 1055 persons initially found eligible to be in Group B were not vaccinated , I will call them B2 and use them for sake of comparison ) .
Instead of using their terms , we could configure the groups another way : Those who got the vaccine immediately ( A1 and C1 ) , those who got the vaccine 21 days after being identified as eligible ( B1 ) , and those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ call Groups A2 , B2 , and C2 ) .
The results of this study tell us a few things .
Aside from fact that the vaccine had negligible effects ( see more below ) , for the nations of Guinea and Liberia , Ebola was not a significant health problem .
By contrast , in Guinea , death rates from malaria and respiratory infection are over 16 times greater than what Ebola was – at its peak .
Similarly , deaths attributed to TB and meningitis combined are about 7 times more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Why Would the Vaccine Fail ?
Despite the real numbers – presented in their own study , the researchers paid by Merck said that ERVEBO was 100 % effective against Ebola ( Henao-Restrepo et al .
2016 ) .
That is , they declared that if ANYONE received a shot , early enough and before exposure , the vaccinee would never get Ebola .
But there are known reasons why the rVSV- ZEBOV vaccine can not improve health .
And these facts were published before the experimental vaccine was injected into unwitting Africans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know , modern medicine determines the efficacy of a vaccine based on the production of antibodies .
( See Plotkin 2010 ) .
But it turns out , that in relation to VSV ( vesicular stomatitis virus , aka mouth ulcer virus ) , antibodies per se , and those stimulated by VSV vaccines are not necessary for immunity !
( See Moseman et al .
2012 ) .
A measure of the immune response that confers protection against EVD is unknown .
( emphasis added ) Yes , you read it correctly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no idea if the vaccine confers protection against Ebola disease .
The lack of understanding between a recombinant VSV vaccine , like ERVEBO , any antibodies produced post injection , and the prevention of EVD is evidenced from the study of Qiu et al .
( 2009 ) .
That team used a recombinant virus , made up of VSV and Ebola proteins , on macaque monkeys .
Though the animals survived a high dose of injected Ebola virus , over the course of 28 days , there was effectively no reduction in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blood .
( See figure 3 in Qiu et al .
2009 ) .
The study also lacked adequate size and a reasonable length of time .
The researchers only injected two macaques with the vaccine ( n = 2 ) , and similarly , the control group was only two monkeys ( n = 2 ) .
And though the vaccine group lived 28 days , Qiu et al .
( 2009 ) euthanized the control group after a mere six days .
Noting the low rate of Ebola infection , even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lack of evidence that any vaccine provides a benefit , is a vaccine needed ?
The simple answer is , “ No.
” According to a CNN editorial of 2014 ( updated in December of 2019 ) : “ Ebola is extremely infectious , but not extremely contagious.
” ( emphasis added ) .
Little surprise then , in relation to the Ebola reports starting in 2013 , even though there was and is no drug therapy , and no proven vaccine – and no shots were ever given to the entire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 9 June 2016 , WHO representatives declared that Liberia was Ebola-free .
Somehow a pathogen , causing infection , illness , and death , just went away .
There are two reports of the same experimental trials conducted on people in the Congo .
One by Amy Maxmen ( 2019 ) writing for Nature magazine , the other is printed in the New England Journal of Medicine ( 12 December 2019 ) .
Because the numbers vary slightly , I will use the figures from the academics ( Mulangu et al .
2019 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ People were assigned into four groups and either injected with antibody cocktails ( biologics ) or given antiviral pills to ingest .
Guess what happened ?
They died – but the drug makers , and Nature magazine , and the editors at the NEJM , called it a success !
As noted above , the WHO says that the fatality rate for an Ebola infection ranges from 25-90 % , with an average of about 50 % .
An unattributed line on a Wikipedia site claims that the death rate is around 70 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the treatment protocols reached survival rates over 68 % .
Rather , each of the four groups experienced death rates within the expected range – for people receiving no treatment .
Importantly , the experiment saw 290 of 673 people die within four weeks of being helped by these agents of war , profit and social control .
The project was mostly funded by the United States government – NIAID , NIH , HHS , our friends at the WHO , and the drugmakers .
The US Department of Defense provided the MAb114 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provided the ZMapp , Regeneron asked the team to test its latest , REGN-EB3 .
And in case you were worried about the integrity of the science , Mulangu et al .
( 2019 ) added a caveat : “ Twelve patients were enrolled , but died before receiving the first infusion : one in the ZMapp group , three in the remdesivir group , three in the MAb114 group , and five in the REGN-EB3 group.
” We should wonder why these four drugs were selected for the study .
Though REGN-EB3 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ therapies , remdesivir is a so-called anti-viral .
According to Anthony Fauci , Director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) , his department has been working with Gilead closely to test whether remdesivir , a drug that could also be used for people diagnosed with coronavirus .
Remdesivir is a combination of carbon , hydrogen , nitrogen , oxygen , and phosphorous .
Its chemical formula is C27H35N6O8P .
In this respect , it is similar in its structure to essential phospholipids including phosphatidylserine , phosphatidylcholine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vital role in protecting cell integrity – keeping out foreign proteins and other toxins ( e.g.
, heavy metals ) .
When we see people fall ill with what is called Ebola , a hemorrhagic fever , we see internal bleeding , indicative of a loss of cellular integrity .
Additionally , remdesivir is similar to ATP ( adenosine triphosphate ) which has a chemical structure of C10H16N5O13P3 .
So it is likely that a person taking remdesivir could experience a short-term benefit , but it does not and can not provide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elements that the body requires .
Over the last 40 years , I have researched health and nutrition .
Thanks to the internet , I have learned from the likes of Dr. Sherri Tenpenny , Dr. Suzanne Humphries , Dr. John Bergman , Dr. Sherry Rogers , Robert Scott Bell , Gary Null , and Joel Wallach .
We do not worry about Ebola , or coronavirus , or flu , or HPV , or Hepatitis , or measles , polio , or pertussis , or any other germs .
We are neither @ @ @ @ @ @ @ times a year , the WHO , CDC , or others announce a new outbreak .
We know that health is from the inside out – it starts with nutrition and includes personal and public hygiene .
Undoubtedly , people diagnosed as being ill with Ebola infection , are suffering from scurvy , extreme Vitamin C deficiency .
Like those with scurvy , severe Ebola illness is characterized by capillary fragility , and a tendency to bleed easily .
Thomas Levy , MD , JD , has researched the applications of vitamin C. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reference : In addition to vitamin C and the essential fatty acids , the immune function can be boosted with vitamin D3 , selenium , and zinc .
Selenium is extremely critical for the people of the eastern Congo because the soils there are depleted in selenium .
Has anyone from the WHO or even the local health officials in Congo , Liberia , Guinea turned to nutrition and food as a basic therapy ?
They never will .
But when told of the next impending virus , what will you do ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888 John C. Jones received his law degree ( 2001 ) and his Ph.D. is in political science ( 2003 ) from the University of Iowa .
He has over 15 years of research and writing ( both academic and journalistic ) in fields of public policy and law , criminal and Constitutional law , and philosophy of science and medicine .
His additional areas of expertise and specialized knowledge include applied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , litigation and court procedure .
He has a particular interest in the science and history of vaccines .

By John Jones, JD PhD, Vaxxter contributor
I am in firm agreement with Jon Rappoport: As news consumers, we’re continually bombarded with sensationalism, encouraging fear, stress, and illness. And all the while, stories of the latest virus, or flu, or “pandemic”, can discourage us from being healthy and understanding how easy it is to be well.
Despite coronavirus talk on the front burner, I have been asked to review the topic of Ebola – which has been bubbling off and on for 40 years in Africa. Though we are told that the epicenter is some far off place, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire), a place over 7,500 miles from significant policymakers in the CDC headquarters in Atlanta and the Pentagon in Washington, there are larger issues and more persistent themes implicated. If nothing else, we should focus on maintaining our health through nutrition and hygiene, and remain steadfast in our resolve to resist plans to expand wars into sub-Saharan Africa.
What Are They (not) Saying?
There are three general themes with Ebola news. (1) Ebola is real – be afraid; (2) backward and ignorant savages in Africa cannot be in charge of quelling this global health threat; and (3) wonderful scientists from Europe, Canada, and the United States are battling, day and night, to create life-saving medicines and vaccines … that will be ready … any day now.
A nd now, for the rest of the story
Of course, there is a back story about Ebola in Africa. When considering geopolitical moves, you should know that Africa has an economical and social link to China. China, the world’s number one petroleum importer, is cementing its grip on mining rights, access to African oil, and other resources through mutually beneficial relations that include building roads, railway systems, hospitals, and schools. And some Chinese factories just happen to operate in the Eastern Congo – where Ebola is. Those details aren’t present in the latest chapter of the Ebola Chronicles.
What is Ebola?
According to the WHO (2019),
Ebola virus disease (EVD), formerly known as Ebola hemorrhagic (bleeding) fever, is a rare but often fatal illness in humans. The average EVD case fatality rate is around 50%. Case fatality rates have varied from 25% to 90% in past outbreaks. The virus is transmitted to people from wild animals and spreads … through human-to-human transmission.”
The WHO says that EVD first appeared in 1976 in South Sudan, and Yambuku, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Eastern DRC is the current center for the present outbreak (2018-2019).
Within the same factsheet, agents at the WHO claim that EVD has a unique cause, but the symptoms look oddly familiar. Initial stages of the disease are show as fever, fatigue, headache, and sore throat. As one gets sicker, the symptoms progress to vomiting, diarrhea, rash, impaired kidney and liver function, internal and external bleeding.
Noting that these symptoms are familiar to clinicians and health care providers on the ground in Africa, the WHO (2019) says:
“It can be difficult to distinguish EVD from other infectious diseases such as malaria, typhoid fever, and meningitis.”
This declaration, that Ebola-virus disease presents with nearly the same symptoms as malaria, typhoid, and meningitis should give us a clue about what the allopaths believe – and what approaches they will continue to take. Remember, they claim that Ebola is a deadly disease, supposedly due to virus, that just sprang up – out of nowhere – 40 years ago. And though they have never cured anyone, they are ever ready to try out some new chemical combinations (a patented drug) and or experimental vaccine.
What is Happening on the Ground?
The WHO is sending out press releases, and copy-ready stories announcing that Ebola is a health crisis.
“Since 2018, Ebola virus disease in spreading the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). By September 2019, [nearly] 3,000 cases and 2,000 deaths had been reported [by WHO field offices].” Cited in Lucey (2019).
And we are all supposed to understand the reason for the outbreaks and epidemics: locals in the DRC are backward, ignorant, and do not trust science.
According to Hamadou Boiro, the World Health Organization’s social anthropologists team leader, Ebola persists in the northeast of the DRC “because there are some in [the] community who refuse to believe that Ebola exists and refuse to seek treatment.”
Otto (2020) adds some information to assist our appreciation of Congolese people as maniacal, conspiracy theorists:
“In December 2018, a politician told his followers that the disease had been invented by the ruling-Government as an excuse for annulling the presidential vote in the Ebola-stricken areas”; and
“In 2019, WHO recorded around 390 attacks on health care facilities. The attacks killed 11 and injured 83 health workers.”
With such vocal and violent opposition, one might find it easier to leave the Africans to their fate. But recall the lesson from Rahm Emmanuel, ‘you never want a serious crisis go to waste.’
THE BOOT CAMP IS COMING SOON – CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION
Humanitarian Rescue Efforts or Medical Experiments?
Recently the government of Canada has announced its incursion to help Africans in the Congo. Karina Gould, Minister of International Development, explains that Canada is allocating $45 million CAD. These funds are going to trusted humanitarian partners working in the Democratic Republic of Congo to respond to Ebola-specific and other humanitarian needs. Activities will include providing:
“Health services … logistics and coordination support, such as air services, to improve the… ability to prevent, detect and respond to outbreaks [in the DRC and neighboring countries]; and training for community health workers and immunization campaign.”
And part of Plan Canada will be local PR. According to a January 17 press release from Global Affairs Canada (2020), nearly $1 million CAD will pay for a Peace and Stabilization Operations Program in the region of Nord-Kivu.
“Project activities will include the creation of communications tools to educate communities on Ebola in order to avoid misinformation and myths about the disease.”
But how will people of the Congo and the world learn about Ebola? Should the Africans know that western medicine has never helped?
No Effective Treatment
Writing in the British Medical Journal, Dr. Daniel Lucey (2019) writes:
“Although the first Ebola outbreaks were recognized in DRC and Sudan in 1976, there has never been an effective treatment.” (emphasis added).
According to the WHO factsheet (2019),
(1) Vaccines to protect against Ebola are under development and have been used [sic] to control [sic] the spread of Ebola in Guinea and in the DRC.
(2) Early supportive care with rehydration … improves survival. There is no licensed treatment proven to neutralize the virus but … immunological and drug therapies are under development.
So now we are back to square one.
On the one hand, the WHO tells us that Ebola looks like other viral infections (malaria, typhoid, and meningitis). Viral infections that vaccines and pharmaceutical drugs have overcome [sic].
But we also see glaring admissions that, none of their pseudo-science, mumbo jumbo has ever worked to prevent or cure Ebola. And how could we expect allopathic interventions to heal Ebola infections when those same protocols have not prevented or cured the other three?
Consider, typhoid fever, supposedly caused by the ever-present salmonella typhi bacteria, exploded, starting in the 1800s, in relation to mass smallpox vaccination campaigns. Each year, there are outbreaks of meningitis among vaccinated university students in the United States. Lastly, the Gates Foundation has been telling us, for years, that a malaria vaccine is just around the corner.
Ebola Treatment? Prevent Wellness, but call it a success!
The WHO factsheet from May 2019 offered the following:
“An experimental Ebola vaccine proved highly protective [sic] against EVD in a major trial in Guinea in 2015. The vaccine, rVSV-ZEBOV, was [used] in a trial involving 11,841 people. Among the 5,837 people who received the vaccine, no Ebola cases were recorded, 10 days or more after vaccination. In comparison, there were 23 cases, 10 days or more after vaccination [sic] among those who did not receive the vaccine.”
They add that the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine is being used in the ongoing Ebola outbreak in DRC that started in 2018.
THE BOOT CAMP IS COMING SOON – CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION
A Second Look at Merck’s ERVEBO Trial
In December 2016, the Lancet reported on the rVSV-ZEBOV trial from West Africa. The lead author, Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo, and her 31 co-authors working at institutes and universities from the U.S, Canada, South Africa, Belgium, Germany, and the UK declare that the vaccine was 100% effective in preventing Ebola outbreaks.
But … I read the study.
Putting aside their CDC-esque data manipulations, and just looking at the reported data, we see that Henao-Restrepo et al. (2016) and their Merck funders, did not find provide any salvation for poor and malnourished Africans. Once we scratch the surface, we see that:
some of the vaccinated had acute reactions to the vaccine – arguably worse than Ebola disease itself;
some of the vaccinated actually fell ill with Ebola, and most significantly,
for two of the three vaccinated groups, Ebola rates were higher than (i) that of the general population; and (ii) that of other non-vaccinated groups in the study.
Group Division
The trial took people from the nations of Guinea and Sierra Leone. After finding their eligible subjects, the researchers divided them into three categories:
(A) randomly chosen, and ready to receive the vaccine immediately;
(B) randomly chosen, and ready to receive the vaccine – but to be injected 21 days later; and
(C) not randomly chosen, but ready to receive the vaccine immediately.
Groups A and C were further divided into two parts: those who received the vaccine; and those who did not. On the other hand, Group B was whittled down through withdrawn consent, illness, and pregnancy.
Thus, from the perspective of the authors, there were five groups – three of whom received the vaccine, and two who did not. I call the former A1, B, and C1, and the latter A2 and C2. (As 1055 persons initially found eligible to be in Group B were not vaccinated, I will call them B2 and use them for sake of comparison).
Instead of using their terms, we could configure the groups another way: Those who got the vaccine immediately (A1 and C1), those who got the vaccine 21 days after being identified as eligible (B1), and those who were left unvaccinated (what I call Groups A2, B2, and C2).
Lancet (2016) Ebola Vaccine Study: one view of the raw data Group A h Group B Group C Total number Group Name (A1) vaccinated (A2) non- vaccinated (B1) vaccine delayed (B2) non- vaccinated (C1) vaccinated (C2) non- vaccinated Number of subjects 2119 1113 2041 1055 1667 329 8026 Ebola (+) cases 11 16 16 21 10 1 75 Ebola cases per 10,000 52 81 19.6 68 60 30.4 60.2
The results of this study tell us a few things.
Aside from fact that the vaccine had negligible effects (see more below), for the nations of Guinea and Liberia, Ebola was not a significant health problem. By contrast, in Guinea, death rates from malaria and respiratory infection are over 16 times greater than what Ebola was – at its peak. Similarly, there are 7 times more deaths prevalent to Ebola in comparison to combining deaths of TB and meningitis.
Why Would the Vaccine Fail?
Despite the real numbers – present in their own study, the researchers state that ERVEBO was 100% effective against Ebola (Henao-Restrepo et al. 2016). That is, if ANYONE receives a shot, early enough and before exposure, the vaccinee will never get Ebola.
But there are reasons why the rVSV- ZEBOV vaccine cannot improve health. And these facts were published before the experimental vaccine was injected into unwitting Africans of Guinea and Liberia.
As we know, modern medicine determines the efficacy of a vaccine based on the production of antibodies. (See Plotkin 2010). But it turns out, that in relation to VSV (vesicular stomatitis virus, aka mouth ulcer virus), antibodies per se, and those stimulated by VSV vaccines are not necessary for immunity! (See Moseman et al. 2012).
Hence, Merck’s package insert for ERVEBO reads:
14.2 Clinical Immunogenicity:
A measure of the immune response that confers protection against EVD is unknown. (emphasis added)
Yes, you read it correctly, even Merck says that they have no idea if the vaccine confers protection against Ebola disease.
Useless Injections
The lack of understanding between a recombinant VSV vaccine, like ERVEBO, any antibodies produced post injection, and the prevention of EVD is evidenced from the study of Qiu et al. (2009). That team used a recombinant virus, made up of VSV and Ebola proteins, on macaque monkeys. Though the animals survived a high dose of injected Ebola virus, over the course of 28 days, there was effectively no reduction in the amount of Ebola virus in their blood. (See figure 3 in Qiu et al. 2009). The study also lacked adequate size and a reasonable length of time. The researchers only injected two macaques with the vaccine (n = 2), and similarly, the control group was only two monkeys (n = 2). And though the vaccine group lived 28 days, Qiu et al. (2009) euthanized the control group after a mere six days.
Noting the low rate of Ebola infection, even in impoverished and malnourished populations, and the lack of evidence that any vaccine provides a benefit, is a vaccine needed? The simple answer is, “No.” According to a CNN editorial of 2014 (updated in December of 2019):
“Ebola is extremely infectious, but not extremely contagious.” (emphasis added).
Little surprise then, in relation to the Ebola reports starting in 2013, even though there was and is no drug therapy, and no proven vaccine – and no shots were ever given to the entire at-risk population in West Africa, by 9 June 2016, WHO representatives declared that Liberia was Ebola-free.
Somehow a pathogen, causing infection, illness, and death, just went away.
Giving Africans Experimental Drugs
There are two experimental trial reports for the people in the Congo. One by Amy Maxmen (2019) writing for Nature magazine, the other is printed in the New England Journal of Medicine (12 December 2019). Because the numbers vary slightly, I will use the figures from the academics (Mulangu et al. 2019) as published in the NEJM.
People were assigned into four groups and either injected with antibody cocktails (biologics) or given antiviral pills to ingest. Guess what happened? They died – but the drug makers, and Nature magazine, and the editors at the NEJM, called it a success!
Treatment (drugs) MAb114 REGN-EB3 ZMapp Remdesivir number 174 155 169 175 deaths by day 28 61 52 84 93 death rate % 35.1 33.5 49.7 53.1 Source: Mulangu et al. (2019): Table 2
Death by Experimentation
As noted above, the WHO says that the fatality rate for an Ebola infection ranges from 25-90%, with an average of about 50%. An unattributed line on a Wikipedia site claims that the death rate is around 70%. But clearly, none of the treatment protocols reached survival rates over 68%. Rather, each of the four groups experienced death rates within the expected range – for people receiving no treatment.
Importantly, the experiment saw 290 of 673 people die within four weeks of being helped by these agents of war, profit and social control. The project was mostly funded by the United States government – NIAID, NIH, HHS, our friends at the WHO, and the drugmakers. The US Department of Defense provided the MAb114, Gilead gave the remdesiver, Mapp provided the ZMapp, Regeneron asked the team to test its latest, REGN-EB3.
And in case you were worried about the integrity of the science, Mulangu et al. (2019) added a caveat:
“Twelve patients were enrolled, but died before receiving the first infusion: one in the ZMapp group, three in the remdesivir group, three in the MAb114 group, and five in the REGN-EB3 group.”
Treatment With Antiviral Drugs?
Why these four drugs specifically for this study? Though REGN-EB3, MAb114, and ZMapp are antibody therapies, remdesivir is a so-called anti-viral. According to Anthony Fauci, Director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), his department has been working with Gilead closely to test whether remdesivir, a drug that could also be used for people diagnosed with coronavirus.
What is Remdesivir?
Remdesivir is a combination of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and phosphorous. Its chemical formula is C27H35N6O8P. In this respect, it is similar in its structure to essential phospholipids including phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylcholine, and phosphatidylethanolamine. These phospholipids play a vital role in protecting cell integrity – keeping out foreign proteins and other toxins (e.g., heavy metals). When we see people fall ill with Ebola, a hemorrhagic fever, we see internal bleeding, indicative of a loss of cellular integrity.
Additionally, remdesivir is similar to ATP (adenosine triphosphate) which has a chemical structure of C10H16N5O13P3. So it is likely that a person taking remdesivir could experience a short-term benefit, but it does not and cannot provide the amount of phosphorous and other significant elements that the body requires.
Back to Basics: It’s the nutrition, stupid!
Over the last 40 years, I have researched health and nutrition. Thanks to the internet, I have learned from the likes of Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Suzanne Humphries, Dr. John Bergman, Dr. Sherry Rogers, Robert Scott Bell, Gary Null, and Joel Wallach. We do not worry about Ebola, or coronavirus, or flu, or HPV, or Hepatitis, or measles, polio, or pertussis, or any other germs. Nor are we shocked nor alarmed that two or three times a year, the WHO, CDC, or others announce a new outbreak. We know that health is from the inside out – it starts with nutrition and includes personal and public hygiene.
Undoubtedly, people diagnosed as being ill with Ebola infection, are suffering from scurvy, extreme Vitamin C deficiency. Like those with scurvy, severe Ebola illness is characterized by capillary fragility, and a tendency to bleed easily.
Vitamin C For Boosting
Thomas Levy, MD, JD, has researched the applications of vitamin C. From his book Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, and Toxins: Curing the Incurable , he includes a reference:
“Cathcart (1981), who introduced the concept of bowel tolerance to vitamin C … hypothesized that Ebola, like other acute viral hemorrhagic fevers, might well require 500,000 mg of vitamin C daily to reach bowel tolerance … oral administration should begin simultaneously, but the intravenous route should not be abandoned [until the patient has recovered]. As death can occur quickly with the hemorrhagic fevers, one cannot be conservative when dosing the vitamin C.”
In addition to vitamin C and the essential fatty acids, the immune function can be boosted with vitamin D3, selenium, and zinc. Selenium is extremely critical for the people of the eastern Congo because the soils there are depleted in selenium.
Has anyone from the WHO or even the local health officials in Congo, Liberia, Guinea turned to nutrition and food as a basic therapy?
They never will.
But when told of the next impending virus, what will you do?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
John C. Jones received his law degree (2001) and his Ph.D. is in political science (2003) from the University of Iowa. He has over 15 years of research and writing (both academic and journalistic) in fields of public policy and law, criminal and Constitutional law, and philosophy of science and medicine. His additional areas of expertise and specialized knowledge include applied statistics, etymology, political communications/public relations, litigation and court procedure. He has a particular interest in the science and history of vaccines.
Photo credit: ID 47415316 © Macgyverhh | Dreamstime.com