vaxxter--2020-10-12--“Autism is Rising; It’s Not Vaccines” – A Premature Conclusion?

This article is a response to Daniel Brezenoff ’ s article “ We Know What ’ s Causing a Rise in Autism Diagnoses — and it ’ s not Vaccines.
” In science , no claim today is more contentious and more likely to cause a disturbance than the claim that “ vaccines can cause autism.
” Scientists vigorously debate string theory , the harms of pesticides in the environment , and climate change , but placing the words vaccines and autism in the same sentence triggers a kind of revulsion that stops any form of scientific inquiry .
There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tremendous public health problem .
Media often portrays people with autism as a kind of Rain Man , delayed in social development but with prodigious gifts .
But that often isn ’ t the case ( such as in this recent tragic news story ) .
Many moderate and severe cases may never be able to live as independent members of society .
And the stress on their families are very real .
Both the media and doctors will repeat , “ The science is settled .
Vaccines don ’ t cause autism.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ years and years , an unsettling conclusion dawned on me : the phrase “ the science is settled ” is only invoked in contentious scientific cases when the ascribed wrong conclusions are damaging to the current scientific establishment .
But you might object , “ Hundreds of studies have shown that vaccines don ’ t cause autism.
” To that claim , we should do what any good scientist should do – let ’ s look at the actual evidence .
If the science is good , then we can be on our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discussing the latest state of COVID-19 .
Well , let me tell you something .
I looked .
I dug into the studies .
I did not like what I saw .
And I ’ m sure you wouldn ’ t either .
There are just – and let me put this as politely as possible – so many inconsistencies !
Good science demands resolving these inconsistencies , but public health seems to be deliberately ignoring them .
If science wants to claim the “ vaccines and autism debate is settled ” , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ science .
As we will see , the science in the vaccine-autism controversy misses the mark .
Problem # 1 : ‘ Vaccines Don ’ t Cause Autism ’ BUT only 1 ingredient and 1 vaccine were studied They claim “ vaccines don ’ t cause autism ” BUT they have only studied one ingredient ( thimerosal ) and only one vaccine ( MMR ) .
The gravitas of the previous statement should be shocking , shocking , shocking to you .
The problem is so glaringly obvious that the below meme is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to every doctor and health professional who says otherwise : Quick do some back-of-the-envelope calculations .
How many vaccines are there ?
Children receive 68 doses .
And there ’ s a plethora of vaccines out there , DTaP , HiB , Varicella , Prevnar , Rotavirus , Hep B , HPV , etc .
And how many ingredients are there ?
A LOT according to the CDC .
The below screenshot shows a sample , but you can see for yourself that vaccine ingredients are not so simple .
An article by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bad science nicely : “ So of the first twenty vaccines given to American babies , how many have been studied for their relationship to autism ?
None .
That ’ s right , because only one vaccine , the MMR , has ever been studied for its relationship to autism .
The MMR is a vaccine first administered to American children at thirteen months of age.
” Houston we have a problem… .
It ’ s clear from looking at any trend graph that autism rates have increased and continue to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a way that is not adequately explained by standard answers given , such as better diagnosis , changes in definition , and statistically-weak-but-contributory factors such as father ’ s age .
The argument that “ increased autism cases are the result of better diagnoses ” would have been stronger in the 1980s and 1990s when autism was not well-known , but this argument fails for the 2000s .
Recall that Andrew Wakefield ’ s controversial paper came out in 1998 and , post a detailed examination of vaccines and autism data , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remove mercury ( in the form of thimerosal ) from the childhood vaccine schedules .
We can see these effects in the data that Brezenoff posted in his article ( albeit with the wrong conclusion ) .
Autism rates have increased over the 5 years independently across the United States .
Moreover , we still have increasing trends , which are corroborated here by data from CDC ’ s Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring ( ADDM ) Network data .
In a recent analysis by Dr. David E. Martin , he reported : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Prevalence Trends from 1931 to 2014 and Comparison to National ASD Data from IDEA and ADDM ” examines California autism rates and reports recent increases within the past decade : The conclusion of the paper sums it up nicely : And to naysayers like Brezenoff , no it ’ s not just changing definitions since the California dataset has already taken this factor into account .
The paper explains : “ CDDS continues to exclude most milder cases of autism , despite two different changes to its diagnostic criteria in the last decade.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s time to stop the denial of it .
Problem # 3 : Aluminum adjuvant from vaccines could lead to autism As explained in a recent statement by the Physicians for Informed Consent , aluminum compounds are used in certain vaccines as adjuvants , ingredients that enhance the immune response to an antigen .
More recent research done during the past decade indicates aluminum , especially from vaccines , may pose a problem .
A 2017 paper “ Aluminium in brain tissue in autism ” examined brains of recently deceased individuals with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aluminum .
Previously , it was thought that aluminum did not cross the blood-brain barrier .
But this study reported some of the highest values for aluminium in human brain tissue yet recorded .
A possibility for how the aluminum got into the brain is that white blood cells are transporting it across the blood-brain barrier .
Study author Dr. Chris Exley wrote in a blog post : “ The new evidence strongly suggests that aluminum is entering the brain in ASD via pro-inflammatory cells which have become loaded up with aluminum in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been demonstrated for monocytes at injection sites for vaccines including aluminum adjuvants.
” Dr. Chris Exley poignantly hit upon a primary concern that public health authorities have not addressed with a one-size-fits-all vaccine program : “ there is something within the genetic make-up of specific individuals which predisposes them to accumulate and retain aluminum in their brain , as is similarly suggested for individuals with familial Alzheimer ’ s disease.
” CDC ’ s public health statement on aluminum acknowledges the neurotoxic effects of aluminum : “ Various neurotoxic effects of aluminum @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from neurobehavioral and neurodevelopmental alterations following repeated oral exposures in mice and rats to neurodegenerative pathological changes in the brain caused by acute parenteral administration in non-rodent species… there is conclusive evidence that aluminum compounds are neurotoxic in orally-exposed animals.
” Additionally , the CDC reported cases in which significant memory impairments were found among workers exposed to inhaled aluminum : “ Higher incidences of subjective neurological symptoms ( e.g.
, incoordination , difficulty buttoning , problems concentrating , headaches , depression , fatigue ) were reported in aluminum pot room or foundry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ key question is what about the safety effects of aluminum on humans especially young children ?
The CDC statement fails to make an adequate comment .
But it does state : “ The neurotoxicity of aluminum following oral exposure has been well established in humans with renal insufficiency and animals ; however , it has not been adequately investigated in healthy humans.
” Sorry CDC this isn ’ t good enough in my book .
The website Vaccine Papers released a paper that presents a biological hypothesis how aluminum in vaccines can lead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peer-reviewed journal , the paper draws upon the latest research , and has been reviewed and endorsed by experts such as Dr Chris Exley , Dr. Chris Shaw , and Dr. Romain Gherardi .
The hypothesis essentially states that over-vaccination and aluminum can lead to a state of immune system activation and chronic inflammation that interferes with normal brain development leading to symptoms that fall in the constellation of symptoms known as autism .
The paper states : “ In early life , the brain and immune system develop together .
Immune activation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elevated cytokines in the brain , thereby disrupting brain development .
Specifically , immune activation can cause life-long brain injury and mental illnesses including autism , seizures/epilepsy , and schizophrenia… It is established beyond a reasonable doubt that autism is caused by immune/microglial activation and IL-6/IL-17 specifically.
” The paper continues on the dangers of over-vaccination : “ Vaccines are designed to cause immune activation .
But can vaccines cause immune activation in the brain ?
Can vaccines induce IL-6 in the brain ?
The answer to these questions is YES .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can travel to the brain and stay there , causing long-term brain inflammation.
” Public health has been dismissive of claims that aluminum in vaccines is problematic by citing that oral aluminum exposure far exceeds that of vaccines .
But this misses the critical fact that , according to CDC ’ s analysis , the ingested uptake rate is a tiny fraction , only 0.07–0.39 % .
Public health officials seem to be unaware of a 2017 paper , “ Non-linear dose-response of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant particles : Selective low dose neurotoxicity , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can be more toxic as it bypasses the body ’ s defensive systems .
With such deleterious effects from aluminum , including new research suggesting an association with breast cancer and Alzheimer ’ s disease , it is time that public health begins a thorough examination of aluminum in vaccines .
To ignore these problems is unethical .
Problem # 4 : A CDC whistleblower said that a vaccine-autism association was found , and the data was suppressed .
A key study against the vaccine-autism connection , still cited by the CDC , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children with autism and school-matched control subjects : a population-based study in metropolitan Atlanta.
” However , the study is fraudulent .
One of the authors Dr. William Thompson came forward as a whistleblower and stated that key data showing the connection between autism and MMR vaccine was deliberately omitted from a key CDC MMR vaccine-autism study .
His full statement can be seen here .
In his legal statement he wrote to law firm Morgan VerKamp , he stated : “ My name is William Thompson .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , where I have worked since 1998 .
I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics .
The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism .
Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected , and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.
” The following screenshot shows the legal statement that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ firm website : The statement is devastating in that it means that the government did indeed find an association between vaccines and autism in a vulnerable subgroup and that this finding was covered up .
This omission constitutes clear admission of scientific fraud at the CDC .
Nobody doubts that William Thompson is a real individual and that he came forward as a government whistleblower .
After all , William Thompson ’ s name is on the 2004 study , and his whistleblower testimony was taken by Congressman William Posey , who would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issue on the House floor .
The above facts are damning for the proposition that “ The vaccine-autism science is settled.
” It means that it never was , and the repetition of the phrase was a lie from public health authorities to protect the national vaccine program .
This is not the first time these accusations have been made ; prominent journalists and scientists have called out these lies .
However public health remains both inactive and silent .
If public health authorities were willing to cover up MMR vaccine and autism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be willing to cover up or manipulate to serve their agendas ?
Science is a dynamic field where new findings are constantly being made , propositions are being challenged , and outdated models are set outside .
So what happens if new science is deliberately ignored ?
The answer is simple : we end up with bad science – the kind of science that should not be used to inform medicine nor public health , the kind of science that harms innocent people , the kind of science that lives in a scientific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ until it is outed , thereby jeopardizing the credibility of all the scientists who bothered to support it in the first place .
History will look back at the handling of the vaccines-autism controversy by public health and will see the rampant scientific bias , groupthink , and public relations campaigns to debunk an association rather than fully explore valid scientific hypotheses and protect the public via the Precautionary Principle .
A more interesting question is “ how did public health permit such bad science to occur for such an extended period ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the idea that mankind is in a perpetual war with infectious disease and vaccines are the only weapon to win this war .
Due to this warlike metaphor , public health is willing to defend vaccines at whatever the cost and minimize the harms to save humanity from a greater existential threat .
Public health you can do far better .
And you can begin by a thorough examination of the vaccine-autism question from an open-perspective .
It ’ s not too late to redress previous wrongs .
Scientist Marie Curie ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ life is to be feared , it is only to be understood .
Now is the time to understand more , so that we may fear less.
” Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Nate Doromal is an activist and writer within the Vaccine Awareness and Vaccine Safety movement .
He is a veteran software engineer , formerly with Google .
Doromal now works in finance .
He holds an MS and an MBA in Computer Science from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Executive MBA from the Smartly Institute .
He was originally trained on vaccines and vaccine activism by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny in her Mastering Vaccine Info Bootcamp .
He has also studied immunological science extensively with Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych through her Building Bridges Course .
He is a contributing writer for Children ’ s Health Defense .

by Nathaniel Doromal, Vaxxter contributor
This article is a response to Daniel Brezenoff’s article “We Know What’s Causing a Rise in Autism Diagnoses — and it’s not Vaccines.”
In science, no claim today is more contentious and more likely to cause a disturbance than the claim that “vaccines can cause autism.” Scientists vigorously debate string theory, the harms of pesticides in the environment, and climate change, but placing the words vaccines and autism in the same sentence triggers a kind of revulsion that stops any form of scientific inquiry.
There is no doubt that autism is a tremendous public health problem. Media often portrays people with autism as a kind of Rain Man, delayed in social development but with prodigious gifts. But that often isn’t the case (such as in this recent tragic news story). Many moderate and severe cases may never be able to live as independent members of society. And the stress on their families are very real.
Both the media and doctors will repeat, “The science is settled. Vaccines don’t cause autism.” After listening to such rhetoric for years and years, an unsettling conclusion dawned on me: the phrase “the science is settled” is only invoked in contentious scientific cases when the ascribed wrong conclusions are damaging to the current scientific establishment.
But you might object, “Hundreds of studies have shown that vaccines don’t cause autism.” To that claim, we should do what any good scientist should do – let’s look at the actual evidence. If the science is good, then we can be on our merry way perhaps off drinking tea and discussing the latest state of COVID-19.
Well, let me tell you something. I looked. I dug into the studies. I did not like what I saw. And I’m sure you wouldn’t either. There are just – and let me put this as politely as possible – so many inconsistencies!
Good science demands resolving these inconsistencies, but public health seems to be deliberately ignoring them. If science wants to claim the “vaccines and autism debate is settled”, then it must do using actual good science. As we will see, the science in the vaccine-autism controversy misses the mark.
Problem #1: ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ BUT only 1 ingredient and 1 vaccine were studied
They claim “vaccines don’t cause autism” BUT they have only studied one ingredient (thimerosal) and only one vaccine (MMR).
The gravitas of the previous statement should be shocking, shocking, shocking to you. The problem is so glaringly obvious that the below meme is not only telling but should be sent to every doctor and health professional who says otherwise:
Quick do some back-of-the-envelope calculations. How many vaccines are there? Children receive 68 doses. And there’s a plethora of vaccines out there, DTaP, HiB, Varicella, Prevnar, Rotavirus, Hep B, HPV, etc.
And how many ingredients are there? A LOT according to the CDC. The below screenshot shows a sample, but you can see for yourself that vaccine ingredients are not so simple.
An article by Children’s Health Defense summarizes this bad science nicely: “So of the first twenty vaccines given to American babies, how many have been studied for their relationship to autism? None. That’s right, because only one vaccine, the MMR, has ever been studied for its relationship to autism. The MMR is a vaccine first administered to American children at thirteen months of age.” Houston we have a problem….
Problem #2: Autism Rates are Still Rising
It’s clear from looking at any trend graph that autism rates have increased and continue to do so. Moreover, they do so in a way that is not adequately explained by standard answers given, such as better diagnosis, changes in definition, and statistically-weak-but-contributory factors such as father’s age.
The argument that “increased autism cases are the result of better diagnoses” would have been stronger in the 1980s and 1990s when autism was not well-known, but this argument fails for the 2000s. Recall that Andrew Wakefield’s controversial paper came out in 1998 and, post a detailed examination of vaccines and autism data, health authorities made the precautionary decision to remove mercury (in the form of thimerosal) from the childhood vaccine schedules.
We can see these effects in the data that Brezenoff posted in his article (albeit with the wrong conclusion). Autism rates have increased over the 5 years independently across the United States.
Moreover, we still have increasing trends, which are corroborated here by data from CDC’s Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network data. In a recent analysis by Dr. David E. Martin, he reported:
Finally, the paper “California Autism Prevalence Trends from 1931 to 2014 and Comparison to National ASD Data from IDEA and ADDM” examines California autism rates and reports recent increases within the past decade:
The conclusion of the paper sums it up nicely:
“CDDS autism prevalence has risen dramatically over the last 35 years, increasing from ~ 0.05% in birth year 1970 to nearly 1.2% in birth year 2012. The available data extending back to 1931 show a prevalence of only 0.001% in that birth cohort.”
And to naysayers like Brezenoff, no it’s not just changing definitions since the California dataset has already taken this factor into account. The paper explains: “CDDS continues to exclude most milder cases of autism, despite two different changes to its diagnostic criteria in the last decade.” Autism rates are increasing and it’s time to stop the denial of it.
Problem #3: Aluminum adjuvant from vaccines could lead to autism
As explained in a recent statement by the Physicians for Informed Consent, aluminum compounds are used in certain vaccines as adjuvants, ingredients that enhance the immune response to an antigen. More recent research done during the past decade indicates aluminum, especially from vaccines, may pose a problem.
A 2017 paper “Aluminium in brain tissue in autism” examined brains of recently deceased individuals with autism and found abnormally high levels of aluminum. Previously, it was thought that aluminum did not cross the blood-brain barrier. But this study reported some of the highest values for aluminium in human brain tissue yet recorded.
A possibility for how the aluminum got into the brain is that white blood cells are transporting it across the blood-brain barrier. Study author Dr. Chris Exley wrote in a blog post:
“The new evidence strongly suggests that aluminum is entering the brain in ASD via pro-inflammatory cells which have become loaded up with aluminum in the blood and/or lymph, much as has been demonstrated for monocytes at injection sites for vaccines including aluminum adjuvants.”
Dr. Chris Exley poignantly hit upon a primary concern that public health authorities have not addressed with a one-size-fits-all vaccine program: “there is something within the genetic make-up of specific individuals which predisposes them to accumulate and retain aluminum in their brain, as is similarly suggested for individuals with familial Alzheimer’s disease.”
CDC’s public health statement on aluminum acknowledges the neurotoxic effects of aluminum: “Various neurotoxic effects of aluminum have been induced in animals, ranging from neurobehavioral and neurodevelopmental alterations following repeated oral exposures in mice and rats to neurodegenerative pathological changes in the brain caused by acute parenteral administration in non-rodent species… there is conclusive evidence that aluminum compounds are neurotoxic in orally-exposed animals.”
Additionally, the CDC reported cases in which significant memory impairments were found among workers exposed to inhaled aluminum:
“Higher incidences of subjective neurological symptoms (e.g., incoordination, difficulty buttoning, problems concentrating, headaches, depression, fatigue) were reported in aluminum pot room or foundry workers at aluminum smelters.”
But the key question is what about the safety effects of aluminum on humans especially young children? The CDC statement fails to make an adequate comment. But it does state: “The neurotoxicity of aluminum following oral exposure has been well established in humans with renal insufficiency and animals; however, it has not been adequately investigated in healthy humans.”
Sorry CDC this isn’t good enough in my book.
The website Vaccine Papers released a paper that presents a biological hypothesis how aluminum in vaccines can lead to autism. Though not from a peer-reviewed journal, the paper draws upon the latest research, and has been reviewed and endorsed by experts such as Dr Chris Exley, Dr. Chris Shaw, and Dr. Romain Gherardi.
The hypothesis essentially states that over-vaccination and aluminum can lead to a state of immune system activation and chronic inflammation that interferes with normal brain development leading to symptoms that fall in the constellation of symptoms known as autism. The paper states:
“In early life, the brain and immune system develop together. Immune activation from an infection or vaccine can cause elevated cytokines in the brain, thereby disrupting brain development. Specifically, immune activation can cause life-long brain injury and mental illnesses including autism, seizures/epilepsy, and schizophrenia… It is established beyond a reasonable doubt that autism is caused by immune/microglial activation and IL-6/IL-17 specifically.”
The paper continues on the dangers of over-vaccination:
“Vaccines are designed to cause immune activation. But can vaccines cause immune activation in the brain? Can vaccines induce IL-6 in the brain? The answer to these questions is YES. The aluminum (Al) adjuvant in vaccines can travel to the brain and stay there, causing long-term brain inflammation.”
Public health has been dismissive of claims that aluminum in vaccines is problematic by citing that oral aluminum exposure far exceeds that of vaccines. But this misses the critical fact that, according to CDC’s analysis, the ingested uptake rate is a tiny fraction, only 0.07–0.39%.
Public health officials seem to be unaware of a 2017 paper, “Non-linear dose-response of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant particles: Selective low dose neurotoxicity,” which indicates smaller doses of aluminum can be more toxic as it bypasses the body’s defensive systems.
With such deleterious effects from aluminum, including new research suggesting an association with breast cancer and Alzheimer’s disease, it is time that public health begins a thorough examination of aluminum in vaccines. To ignore these problems is unethical.
Problem #4: A CDC whistleblower said that a vaccine-autism association was found, and the data was suppressed.
A key study against the vaccine-autism connection, still cited by the CDC, is the following study, “Age at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children with autism and school-matched control subjects: a population-based study in metropolitan Atlanta.” However, the study is fraudulent.
One of the authors Dr. William Thompson came forward as a whistleblower and stated that key data showing the connection between autism and MMR vaccine was deliberately omitted from a key CDC MMR vaccine-autism study. His full statement can be seen here. In his legal statement he wrote to law firm Morgan VerKamp, he stated:
“My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998. I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”
The following screenshot shows the legal statement that was previously posted on Morgan VerKamp law firm website:
The statement is devastating in that it means that the government did indeed find an association between vaccines and autism in a vulnerable subgroup and that this finding was covered up. This omission constitutes clear admission of scientific fraud at the CDC.
Does William Thompson’s testimony show there is a causal association between vaccines and autism? It doesn’t show causality BUT it does show that an association was found AND the vaccine-autism connection is plausible, requiring further studies.
Nobody doubts that William Thompson is a real individual and that he came forward as a government whistleblower. After all, William Thompson’s name is on the 2004 study, and his whistleblower testimony was taken by Congressman William Posey, who would later call for an investigation of the issue on the House floor.
The above facts are damning for the proposition that “The vaccine-autism science is settled.” It means that it never was, and the repetition of the phrase was a lie from public health authorities to protect the national vaccine program.
This is not the first time these accusations have been made; prominent journalists and scientists have called out these lies. However public health remains both inactive and silent.
If public health authorities were willing to cover up MMR vaccine and autism associations, what other data would they be willing to cover up or manipulate to serve their agendas?
Towards A Renewed Vision of Public Health
Science is a dynamic field where new findings are constantly being made, propositions are being challenged, and outdated models are set outside. So what happens if new science is deliberately ignored?
The answer is simple: we end up with bad science – the kind of science that should not be used to inform medicine nor public health, the kind of science that harms innocent people, the kind of science that lives in a scientific hell of illogic whose days are numbered until it is outed, thereby jeopardizing the credibility of all the scientists who bothered to support it in the first place.
History will look back at the handling of the vaccines-autism controversy by public health and will see the rampant scientific bias, groupthink, and public relations campaigns to debunk an association rather than fully explore valid scientific hypotheses and protect the public via the Precautionary Principle.
A more interesting question is “how did public health permit such bad science to occur for such an extended period?” The answer is vaccine fundamentalism, the idea that mankind is in a perpetual war with infectious disease and vaccines are the only weapon to win this war. Due to this warlike metaphor, public health is willing to defend vaccines at whatever the cost and minimize the harms to save humanity from a greater existential threat.
Public health you can do far better. And you can begin by a thorough examination of the vaccine-autism question from an open-perspective. It’s not too late to redress previous wrongs.
Scientist Marie Curie’s words apply here: “Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood. Now is the time to understand more, so that we may fear less.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text DRT to 22828
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nate Doromal is an activist and writer within the Vaccine Awareness and Vaccine Safety movement. He is a veteran software engineer, formerly with Google. Doromal now works in finance. He holds an MS and an MBA in Computer Science from the University of Chicago. He holds an Executive MBA from the Smartly Institute. He was originally trained on vaccines and vaccine activism by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny in her Mastering Vaccine Info Bootcamp. He has also studied immunological science extensively with Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych through her Building Bridges Course. He is a contributing writer for Children’s Health Defense.


vaxxter--2020-10-14--How Much More Can Americans Withstand?

How Much More Can Americans Withstand?

When I first was introduced into the problems associated with vaccines at the National Vaccine Information Center ( NVIC ) meeting in September 2000 , I was nearly overwhelmed by the amount of appalling information I was uncovering .
I needed help to process all the information and to sort it out .
Among my first mentors were Ingri Cassel , founder of Vaccine Liberation and her husband , Don Harkins , the editor of the Idaho Observer monthly newspaper .
After a few phone calls , we became life-long friends .
Whenever I called Idaho – to seek advice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the right path and wasn ’ t crazy , or to just mull over life ’ s unexplainable events – Don would most often answer the phone .
His chipper , lilting voice would greet me with , “ Idaho Observer !
” I would smile and retort , “ So , what are you observing in Idaho today ?
” Never missing a beat , Don would recognize my voice , and with unforgettable charm and his hallmark giggle , he would respond , “ Well hello there !
” He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hot story ” of the day , sharing what he was writing , researching , or pondering .
No matter how busy or how pressed for time , Don always carved out space for me to share his wit , to generate a few laughs , and to tell unforgettable stories .
He always made me feel special .
At that moment , I was the most important person in the world for which he ’ d drop everything and give his full attention .
More likely than not , he did the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his assessments of world events were sometimes disturbing , they were always spot-on .
Don ’ s wisdom ran deep , and the years of banter and debate contributed substantially to my personal growth .
I will always cherish the many thought-provoking “ Don-isms ” , delivered in a way that all of us knew so well as “ typically Don.
” On September 19 , 2009 , the world lost a Giant Placeholder for truth , freedom , and liberty .
Don ’ s work will live on through the hundreds of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ style .
This article , “ Are Americans Dying for Martial Law ?
” has long remained one of my favorites .
It is a timeless example of Don ’ s quest to explain the madness in the world around us .
This article takes the perspective of Congress writing a letter to the American people .
While written in 1998 , with minimal grammatical modifications , this piece couldn ’ t be more spot-on if it were written today in 2020 .
Don Harkins was instrumental in shaping and guiding the lives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see .
His tutelage has helped me to this day be a better writer and speaker .
A gentleman and a gentleman , I will always remember Don for his laughter and the love he selflessly gave to so many persons , from all walks of life .
I am proud to be counted among his friends .
Rest in peace , dear friend .
As you read through this article , keep in mind the date it was written : 1998 .
It ’ s an easy – and scary – reach @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about is coming to fruition today .
Will you please get mad enough already so that we can declare martial law ?
What is it going to take to get you mad enough so that we can finally justify ending this silly little game of thrust and parry with your constitutional rights by declaring a state of national emergency and get those pesky rights out of the way once and for all ?
We have pushed every button that we can think of and you refuse to get angry enough to engage in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ methodically stripped you of your constitutional and civil rights .
We have shot , bombed and burned hundreds of innocent men , women , children and dogs and cats .
We have fueled both sides of little wars all over the world with profits generated from the sale of drugs to your children which are purposefully being made stupider with every federal dollar that is contributed in the interest of their education .
We overrule your jury decisions and declare the initiatives and referendums you vote for unconstitutional .
We have unconstitutionally decided @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the most resource wealth are federal lands and are building gates to keep you out of them .
We are working to strip you of your right to keep and bear arms as fast as we can .
We have created trade agreements with foreign nations which are killing your ability to make a decent living and raise a family .
And we are taxing you to death to pay for all the evil things we are doing to you .
What is it going to take to make you get mad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last nail into your constitutional coffin ?
When are you going to rise up as a once-free people and oppose us ?
When are you going to provide us with the collective indignation that will give us justification to suspend forever the silly little document which is the only thing that stands between you and the slavery we want to give you to protect you from yourselves ?
Let us draw you a map If you were smart enough to read the publicly available documents which prove that in 1970 , Congress approved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you AIDS ( and has subsequently produced its much more efficient cousin Ebola ) and that the Department of Defense legally ( Title 50 , Chapter 32 , Section 1524 of the U.S. Code ) used 500,000 Gulf War-era soldiers as guinea pigs for a horrible cocktail of experimental substances , would all of you become angry as hell and generate the critical mass of social tension in this country that we feel will be necessary for us to justify a declaration of martial law ?
Why can ’ t you understand that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monster that is hell-bent on reducing inalienably sovereign citizens to the status of slaves who exist as an expendable pool of human resources ?
How can you just sit their like sheep while we steal all of your property , ruin your businesses , and spend billions of your dollars , researching ways to kill you more efficiently ?
What is the matter with you ?
We have even gone so far as to humiliate you by allowing untrustable , immoral presidents who has committed numerous felonies to remain in office .
What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to you before you get mad enough to attempt to hold us accountable for betraying you ?
When are you going to give us the excuse we need to justify our historically inevitable intentions : to declare martial law and reduce you to your rightful station in serfdom ?
( Nearly ) Every member of Congress Why are Americans dying for martial law ?
The federal government has made no secret of its elaborate and despotic plans to deal with a national emergency .
The plans are found in executive orders and in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public libraries .
A grade-school understanding of world history would have us understand that the federal government is likely to create the national emergency and that it intends to implement those elaborate and despotic national emergency plans at precisely the right moment in its incessant mission to transfer our inalienable individual liberties into dictatorial federal control .
The federal government has painstakingly drawn us a three-dimensional , full-color map of how it has betrayed all of us , including its military personnel , by facilitating , if not initiating , the epidemic of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ menus and cocktails of man-made chemical and biological substances against which we are virtually defenseless .
Why would it do that ?
Because it is frustrated in its inability to get a rise out of the American people that is significant enough to justify a declaration of martial law no matter how blatantly it abuses and murders us .
The American people are so fat , lazy , stupid and apathetic that even when the federal government draws us a neon-colored map which illustrates an obvious plan to make us agonizingly sick for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths , Americans will not demand accountability .
Is there anything that the federal government could have done to make it more obvious that it wished to be caught in the act of killing its own troops and infecting its own population with indefensible contagions ?
Understanding what is true based upon the federal government ’ s own documentation , is there anything left , short of indiscriminately rounding up and publicly executing innocent people because of something ridiculous like hair color , that will make the American people angry enough to generate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would justify the federal government ’ s declaration of martial law ?
Consider the following : • That at a congressional DoD appropriations hearing in 1970 , Congress gave the DOD $ 10 million for five years so that it could develop a contagion that is identical in its description to what we understand today to be AIDS ; • The world ’ s leading immunological researchers have published works and have stated publicly that they have been engaging in this type of research since the 60s and that Ebola is the fruit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certain test populations in New York , San Francisco and Africa were purposefully infected with AIDS ; • The government entities which documented their plans to go to war with Iraq in 1988 ; • The government entities which approved the documented sale of chemical and biological materials by American companies to Iraq and Iran from 1983 to as recently as 1993 ; • The government entities which knew that chemical and biological weapons were awaiting “ coalition ” forces in the Gulf ; • The government entities which inoculated their unsuspecting troops @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protect them ; • The government entities which knew what mustard gas , sarin gas , anthrax , and a full menu of other deadly toxins do to ravage the human body ; • The government entities which have incessantly denied that American troops were exposed to these contagions which were sold from the laboratories of American companies to support the biological weapons programs in Iraq and Iran prior to the war ; • The government entities which refuse to treat their soldiers , and now the spouses and children of soldiers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and eventually fatal symptoms they are enduring ; • The government entities which will prescribe psychotropic drugs like Prozac for those they view as mental patients but will not prescribe antibiotics to sick people because they still maintain that a disease that does not exist can not be treated .
Why aren ’ t we mad yet ?
Why won ’ t the painstakingly documented plot to kill us and ruin our children make us mad ?
The federal government , and the little men behind the curtain who actually run it , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American people whose inalienable rights it wants desperately to forever alienate through a declaration of martial law .
It is because we refuse to become collectively angered at the capital crimes that we are perversely paying public puppets to perpetrate upon us that is the cause of the deepening cycle of oppression that once-free Americans are suffering .
Once the sleeping American public understands that , contrary to the public position our government has maintained from the beginning , it created AIDS and Ebola [ and now COVID – ST ] with our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our troops to chemical and biological agents during the Gulf War , a declared state of emergency ( martial law ) will have to be declared in an attempt to restore a semblance of order to this justifiably outraged nation .
Was that the government ’ s plan for the World Trade Center Bombing ?
Waco ?
Ruby Ridge ?
Oklahoma City ?
TWA 800 ?
Was that why the government admitted , 30 years too late , that the second Gulf of Tonkin incident which was credited for U.S. ground troops being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Was the government trying , unsuccessfully , to make us mad enough so that it could declare martial law and strip us of the few rights that haven ’ t yet been completely alienated ?
It seems quite apparent that the federal government is either so stupid that it can not help documenting every evil , murderous , treasonous step it takes regardless of its potentially riotous consequences , or that it is purposefully documenting its unthinkably evil machinations with the intention of prodding us into riotousness that could warrant a declared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including AIDS , Ebola , and Gulf War Illness and incidents like Ruby Ridge and Waco , millions of people have died for martial law .
Since we as an apathetic people naively await federal justice to be dispensed from federal government determinations from federal government investigations of federal government transgressions by federal government employees , we can expect a few million more innocent people to die for martial law .
Are the American people so unbelievably apathetic that not even an insidious plan to kill us off and cripple our children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ become civilly disobedient enough to demand real investigations into the activities of a federal government which has slowly and methodically dismantled and destroyed our Constitutional Republic ?
We will soon find out .
But , never fear , if killing us and creating a generation of horribly birth-defective children won ’ t make us mad , if stealing all of our land and our resources and our businesses and teaching our children to be mindless , amoral idiots won ’ t make us mad , I hear that the federal government has imminent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , pre-1990 model automobiles .
That ought to make people pretty mad .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our list .

by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
When I first was introduced into the problems associated with vaccines at the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) meeting in September 2000, I was nearly overwhelmed by the amount of appalling information I was uncovering. I needed help to process all the information and to sort it out. Among my first mentors were Ingri Cassel, founder of Vaccine Liberation and her husband, Don Harkins, the editor of the Idaho Observer monthly newspaper.
After a few phone calls, we became life-long friends. Whenever I called Idaho – to seek advice, to get reassurance that I was on the right path and wasn’t crazy, or to just mull over life’s unexplainable events – Don would most often answer the phone. His chipper, lilting voice would greet me with, “Idaho Observer!” I would smile and retort, “So, what are you observing in Idaho today?”
Never missing a beat, Don would recognize my voice, and with unforgettable charm and his hallmark giggle, he would respond, “Well hello there!” He’d then launch into the “hot story” of the day, sharing what he was writing, researching, or pondering. No matter how busy or how pressed for time, Don always carved out space for me to share his wit, to generate a few laughs, and to tell unforgettable stories. He always made me feel special. At that moment, I was the most important person in the world for which he’d drop everything and give his full attention. More likely than not, he did the same for all his friends.
While his assessments of world events were sometimes disturbing, they were always spot-on. Don’s wisdom ran deep, and the years of banter and debate contributed substantially to my personal growth. I will always cherish the many thought-provoking “Don-isms”, delivered in a way that all of us knew so well as “typically Don.”
On September 19, 2009, the world lost a Giant Placeholder for truth, freedom, and liberty. Don’s work will live on through the hundreds of amazing pieces he crafted with insight and style. This article, “Are Americans Dying for Martial Law?” has long remained one of my favorites. It is a timeless example of Don’s quest to explain the madness in the world around us. This article takes the perspective of Congress writing a letter to the American people. While written in 1998, with minimal grammatical modifications, this piece couldn’t be more spot-on if it were written today in 2020.
Don Harkins was instrumental in shaping and guiding the lives of thousands who had the eyes to see. His tutelage has helped me to this day be a better writer and speaker. A gentleman and a gentleman, I will always remember Don for his laughter and the love he selflessly gave to so many persons, from all walks of life. I am proud to be counted among his friends. Rest in peace, dear friend.
As you read through this article, keep in mind the date it was written: 1998. It’s an easy – and scary – reach to see how everything that Don wrote about is coming to fruition today.
November 1998 Idaho Observer: Are Americans Dying for Martial Law?
Dearest Our Fellow Americans:
Will you please get mad enough already so that we can declare martial law?
What is it going to take to get you mad enough so that we can finally justify ending this silly little game of thrust and parry with your constitutional rights by declaring a state of national emergency and get those pesky rights out of the way once and for all?
We have pushed every button that we can think of and you refuse to get angry enough to engage in acts of social unrest: We have methodically stripped you of your constitutional and civil rights. We have shot, bombed and burned hundreds of innocent men, women, children and dogs and cats. We have fueled both sides of little wars all over the world with profits generated from the sale of drugs to your children which are purposefully being made stupider with every federal dollar that is contributed in the interest of their education. We overrule your jury decisions and declare the initiatives and referendums you vote for unconstitutional. We have unconstitutionally decided that the 62 percent of the country with the most resource wealth are federal lands and are building gates to keep you out of them. We are working to strip you of your right to keep and bear arms as fast as we can. We have created trade agreements with foreign nations which are killing your ability to make a decent living and raise a family. And we are taxing you to death to pay for all the evil things we are doing to you.
What is it going to take to make you get mad enough so we can finally pound the last nail into your constitutional coffin? When are you going to rise up as a once-free people and oppose us? When are you going to provide us with the collective indignation that will give us justification to suspend forever the silly little document which is the only thing that stands between you and the slavery we want to give you to protect you from yourselves?
Let us draw you a map
If you were smart enough to read the publicly available documents which prove that in 1970, Congress approved the funding of research that has given you AIDS (and has subsequently produced its much more efficient cousin Ebola) and that the Department of Defense legally (Title 50, Chapter 32, Section 1524 of the U.S. Code) used 500,000 Gulf War-era soldiers as guinea pigs for a horrible cocktail of experimental substances, would all of you become angry as hell and generate the critical mass of social tension in this country that we feel will be necessary for us to justify a declaration of martial law?
Damn you people.
Why can’t you understand that your government has evolved into an evil monster that is hell-bent on reducing inalienably sovereign citizens to the status of slaves who exist as an expendable pool of human resources? How can you just sit their like sheep while we steal all of your property, ruin your businesses, and spend billions of your dollars, researching ways to kill you more efficiently?
What is the matter with you? We have even gone so far as to humiliate you by allowing untrustable, immoral presidents who has committed numerous felonies to remain in office. What are we going to have to do to you before you get mad enough to attempt to hold us accountable for betraying you? When are you going to give us the excuse we need to justify our historically inevitable intentions: to declare martial law and reduce you to your rightful station in serfdom?
Sincerely,
(Nearly) Every member of Congress
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why are Americans dying for martial law?
The federal government has made no secret of its elaborate and despotic plans to deal with a national emergency. The plans are found in executive orders and in U.S. Code and are available in most public libraries.
A grade-school understanding of world history would have us understand that the federal government is likely to create the national emergency and that it intends to implement those elaborate and despotic national emergency plans at precisely the right moment in its incessant mission to transfer our inalienable individual liberties into dictatorial federal control.
The federal government has painstakingly drawn us a three-dimensional, full-color map of how it has betrayed all of us, including its military personnel, by facilitating, if not initiating, the epidemic of cancers and infections in our population with menus and cocktails of man-made chemical and biological substances against which we are virtually defenseless.
Why would it do that? Because it is frustrated in its inability to get a rise out of the American people that is significant enough to justify a declaration of martial law no matter how blatantly it abuses and murders us. The American people are so fat, lazy, stupid and apathetic that even when the federal government draws us a neon-colored map which illustrates an obvious plan to make us agonizingly sick for the several years prior to our eventual deaths, Americans will not demand accountability.
Is there anything that the federal government could have done to make it more obvious that it wished to be caught in the act of killing its own troops and infecting its own population with indefensible contagions? Understanding what is true based upon the federal government’s own documentation, is there anything left, short of indiscriminately rounding up and publicly executing innocent people because of something ridiculous like hair color, that will make the American people angry enough to generate a critical mass of public outrage that would justify the federal government’s declaration of martial law?
Consider the following:
That at a congressional DoD appropriations hearing in 1970, Congress gave the DOD $10 million for five years so that it could develop a contagion that is identical in its description to what we understand today to be AIDS;
The world’s leading immunological researchers have published works and have stated publicly that they have been engaging in this type of research since the 60s and that Ebola is the fruit of research that has been conducted since certain test populations in New York, San Francisco and Africa were purposefully infected with AIDS;
The government entities which documented their plans to go to war with Iraq in 1988;
The government entities which approved the documented sale of chemical and biological materials by American companies to Iraq and Iran from 1983 to as recently as 1993;
The government entities which knew that chemical and biological weapons were awaiting “coalition” forces in the Gulf;
The government entities which inoculated their unsuspecting troops with strange, experimental chemicals to supposedly protect them;
The government entities which knew what mustard gas, sarin gas, anthrax, and a full menu of other deadly toxins do to ravage the human body;
The government entities which have incessantly denied that American troops were exposed to these contagions which were sold from the laboratories of American companies to support the biological weapons programs in Iraq and Iran prior to the war;
The government entities which refuse to treat their soldiers, and now the spouses and children of soldiers, for the multitude of contagious, agonizing and eventually fatal symptoms they are enduring;
The government entities which will prescribe psychotropic drugs like Prozac for those they view as mental patients but will not prescribe antibiotics to sick people because they still maintain that a disease that does not exist cannot be treated.
Why aren’t we mad yet?
Why won’t the painstakingly documented plot to kill us and ruin our children make us mad?
The federal government, and the little men behind the curtain who actually run it, have continually overestimated the complacency of the American people whose inalienable rights it wants desperately to forever alienate through a declaration of martial law. It is because we refuse to become collectively angered at the capital crimes that we are perversely paying public puppets to perpetrate upon us that is the cause of the deepening cycle of oppression that once-free Americans are suffering.
Once the sleeping American public understands that, contrary to the public position our government has maintained from the beginning, it created AIDS and Ebola [and now COVID – ST] with our tax dollars and that it purposefully exposed our troops to chemical and biological agents during the Gulf War, a declared state of emergency (martial law) will have to be declared in an attempt to restore a semblance of order to this justifiably outraged nation.
Was that the government’s plan for the World Trade Center Bombing? Waco? Ruby Ridge? Oklahoma City? TWA 800? Was that why the government admitted, 30 years too late, that the second Gulf of Tonkin incident which was credited for U.S. ground troops being sent to Viet Nam never actually happened? Was the government trying, unsuccessfully, to make us mad enough so that it could declare martial law and strip us of the few rights that haven’t yet been completely alienated?
It seems quite apparent that the federal government is either so stupid that it cannot help documenting every evil, murderous, treasonous step it takes regardless of its potentially riotous consequences, or that it is purposefully documenting its unthinkably evil machinations with the intention of prodding us into riotousness that could warrant a declared state of national emergency.
By now, including AIDS, Ebola, and Gulf War Illness and incidents like Ruby Ridge and Waco, millions of people have died for martial law. Since we as an apathetic people naively await federal justice to be dispensed from federal government determinations from federal government investigations of federal government transgressions by federal government employees, we can expect a few million more innocent people to die for martial law.
Are the American people so unbelievably apathetic that not even an insidious plan to kill us off and cripple our children with birth defects will compel us to become civilly disobedient enough to demand real investigations into the activities of a federal government which has slowly and methodically dismantled and destroyed our Constitutional Republic?
We will soon find out. But, never fear, if killing us and creating a generation of horribly birth-defective children won’t make us mad, if stealing all of our land and our resources and our businesses and teaching our children to be mindless, amoral idiots won’t make us mad, I hear that the federal government has imminent plans to ban all of our older, pre-1990 model automobiles.
That ought to make people pretty mad.
Sincerely,
Don Harkins, The Idaho Observer
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow. Join our list.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a board-certified osteopathic medical doctor from Cleveland, Ohio. Dr. Tenpenny is a practicing physician and cares for patients 2.5 days per week. Dr. Tenpenny is an internationally known expert on the problems associated with vaccines. Students from all over the world have become confident parents and articulate activists through her online educational courses, found at Courses4Mastery.com. As the “Voice for the Health Freedom,” Dr. Tenpenny is an outspoken advocate for free choice in healthcare, including the right to refuse vaccination.
Photocredit: 38564883 © Fedecandoniphoto | Dreamstime.com


vaxxter--2020-10-15--Interview and Insights, Part 2: Robert Kennedy, Jr – On Vaccine Dangers and Medical Tyranny

by Maryam Henein , founder of HoneyColony and Vaxxter contributor In Part 1 of this two-part interview with Robert Kennedy Jr , we discussed COVID testing and RFKJr ’ s journey from an environmental lawyer to an advocate for vaccine-injured children and all of humanity .
Find Part 1 here .
Hail to Corona .
Democracy under this virus has been waived .
We are told “ do this ” under the guise of safety when it ’ s truly under the heavy-handed reign of Scientism .
“ Can Fauci present America with risk assessments and science on social distancing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mr. Kennedy .
“ He ’ s a virologist , not an economist.
” In May 2020 , The New England Journal of Medicine had this to say about social-distancing and masks ( emphasis added ) : “ We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little if any , protection from infection .
Public health authorities define a significant exposure to COVID-19 as face-to-face contact within six feet with a patient with symptomatic COVID-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes ( and some say more than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The chance of catching COVID-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal .
In many cases , the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.
” Meanwhile , a 2015 study found cloth masks , when compared to surgical masks , increase the rate of influenza-like illnesses by 13 times !
Cloth masks are probably best avoided and should not be reused without properly sanitizing them .
Regular surgical masks are not much better .
The COVID-19 virus is 0.125 µm in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to not adequately filter against aerosols measuring from 0.9-3.1 µm .
Other researchers have shown that particles from 0.04-0.2 µm can penetrate surgical masks .
“ A face cloth mask is essentially the same as trying to stop mosquitoes with a chainlink fence , ” says Mr. Kennedy .
For more details about the myth of mask protection , read Dr. Tenpenny ’ s article on masks : go here .
Many of us don ’ t remember any country being put into lockdown or introducing social-distancing in a bad flu year or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , former Head of Biostatistics , Epidemiology , and Research Design at Rockefeller University ’ s Center for Clinical and Translational Science supports the idea of exposing a population to a virus to induce community-based , natural herd immunity .
Interviewed by The Press and The Public Project in April 2020 , he stated ( emphasis added ) : “ With all respiratory diseases , the only thing that stops the [ spread of ] disease is herd immunity .
About 80 percent of the people need to have had contact with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ won ’ t even have recognized that they were infected , or they had very , very mild symptoms , especially if they are children .
So , it ’ s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get herd immunity as fast as possible… ” The evidence makes it clear to me that we ’ re being manipulated .
Dr. Vernon Coleman , MD , of the United Kingdom noted back in March , as highlighted in James Perloff ’ s book COVID-19 and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The panic and the hysteria are wildly overblown .
There really isn ’ t any need to stop all non-urgent operations and there ’ s no need to close shops and cafes and put people out of work , which is what ’ s going to happen ; the economies all around the world are going to be in a terrible state .
Loads of people are going to lose their jobs , and when people lose their jobs , then the death rate goes up ; there ’ s a well-known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ By the end of May , more than 40 million Americas had filed unemployment claims since mid-March .
Calls to suicide hotlines were up 600 percent , and liquor sales 300 to 600 percent , according to a May,2020 letter sent to President Trump by more than 500 doctors , urging him to end the lockdown , which they called a “ mass casualty incident.
” We were told it would take two weeks of lockdown to flatten the curve , but in reality , the lockdowns have caused exponentially more harm than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the ‘ cure ’ – masks , distancing , tracing , shutdowns , terrorizing children , dividing families – is must worse than the disease .
Does Fauci care about our health ?
“ For Fauci , pandemic planning is about selling vaccines .
As part of this goal , he spent money on ‘ weird ’ Gain of Function ( GOF ) studies , ” says Kennedy .
In 2019 , the National Institutes of Health , with backing from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the course of six years for research , some of which was the gain of function variety .
This came on top of a different $ 3.7 million , a five-year project that involved collecting bat coronaviruses and studying them .
The first program funded virologist Shi Zheng-Li and other researchers at the Wuhan Lab and came to a close last year .
Retired U.S. Army Reserve Col. Lawrence Sellin ( Ret . )
penned an article calling for a full investigation into NIAID , its leader Anthony Fauci , and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the three conspired to unleash the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) into the world .
Writing for the Citizens Commission on National Security ( CCNS ) , Sellin presents a compilation of evidence to suggest that Fauci played a key role in not only exposing the world to the p*andemic but also in getting it funded through large , taxpayer-funded grants given by his department to the controversial Wuhan Institute of Virology ( WIV ) .
During Fauci ’ s career , which has spanned six presidencies and 36 years , there is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ controversies , as well as numerous citations for violating contract “ time ” and “ amount ” rules and the Anti-Deficiency Act , a federal law .
“ An accurate accounting of the countless deaths , widespread disease and community destruction , damage to the national and state economies , societal collapse and citywide devastation , bankrupted businesses and ruined families , etc .
is simply too long to list here , ” writes The Millennium Report .
“ Nevertheless , when the damage is finally assessed , few individuals on the national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Anthony Stephen Fauci.
” What Happened To The Democratic Party ?
It was a priceless question recently asked by someone who always referred to herself as a life-long democrat…until she realized that those who make up the party are no longer reasonable and have arguably lost their souls to Big Pharma .
In a nutshell , says Kennedy , campaign finance laws were overturned by Buckley vs Valeo and when Reagan won , he signed the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program NCVICP into law in 1986 .
“ Democrats have long positioned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those agencies from Republican insults , ” explains Mr. Kennedy .
“ Democrats aligned with people who worked in government agencies , who were on our side regarding guns , children ’ s health , abortion , etc .
And then , as Republicans slowly hollowed out those agencies and made them sock puppets for industry , Democrats did not recognize that process.
” And that ’ s exactly what happened with Tony Fauci , continues Mr. Kennedy .
“ He ’ s an industry representative , not a regulator .
And then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ democrats made a deal with pharma and said , ‘ Ok , if we get Obama Care through , we will make it so we can not negotiate drug prices with you .
We ’ ll pay whatever it is that you want.
’ That ’ s how the Democrats got Big Pharma on board to push Obama Care .
That was the first time democrats started taking pharmaceutical money .
Unlike the Republicans , [ up until then ] they did not take money from the industry , they only took money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When we spoke on September 20 , Ruth Bader Ginsburg had just passed away .
Mr. Kennedy wrote a eulogy on Instagram touting the supreme court justice as a medical freedom champion for her dissent in the Bruesewitz v. Wyeth decision in 2011 .
The Court , in a 6-2 opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia , held that the “ plaintiffs design defect claims [ were ] expressly preempted by the Vaccine Act.
” The decision by the Court affirmed that vaccine manufacturers are not liable for vaccine-induced injury or death if they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warnings.
” Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ginsburg said that Scalia ’ s opinion caused “ considerable violence to the statutory texts , misconstrued the legislative history and drew all the wrong conclusions ” from the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act .
Ginsburg wrote that “ Scalia ’ s decision made vaccines immensely profitable and gave blanket immunity to the 72 mandated doses of unnecessary , untested , risky , zero liability vaccines now on the mandatory schedule.
” It ’ s not very common for those in office to stand firm against Big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2016 , when Trump ran for president , he openly stated that vaccines might be linked to autism .
Shortly thereafter , the pharmaceutical industry helped craft the democratic narrative , adds Bobby that “ This is anti-science .
They purported that this comment was like the ‘ rest of his anti-intellectual stuff and his rhetoric as a climate-denier.
’ ” COVID-19 , at peak lethality , imposed a 0.26 % death rate .
Today on the heels of an election , many of us , including Bobby Kennedy , Jr. realize @ @ @ @ @ @ @ finalize a true Orwellian , authoritarian and totalitarian society that rewards corruption , censorship , oppression , collusion and eliminates our liberties and right to bodily autonomy .
We must resist the international agenda that is being imposed on the citizens of the world , an agenda which includes legalized spying , restriction of travel and local mobility , mandatory vaccination , expansion of 5G , and the transition to a digital , cashless society .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or text DRT to 22828 Maryam Henein is a Canadian-born investigative journalist , activist , functional medicine consultant , filmmaker and founder of HoneyColony .
She directed the documentary Vanishing of the Bees narrated by Ellen Page Early life and education .
Follow her on Twitter @ maryamhenein and youtube.com/maryamheneinbeelady

by Maryam Henein, founder of HoneyColony and Vaxxter contributor
In Part 1 of this two-part interview with Robert Kennedy Jr, we discussed COVID testing and RFKJr’s journey from an environmental lawyer to an advocate for vaccine-injured children and all of humanity. Find Part 1 here.
Hail to Corona. Democracy under this virus has been waived. We are told “do this” under the guise of safety when it’s truly under the heavy-handed reign of Scientism.
“Can Fauci present America with risk assessments and science on social distancing, masks or lockdowns,” asks Mr. Kennedy. “He’s a virologist, not an economist.”
In May 2020, The New England Journal of Medicine had this to say about social-distancing and masks (emphasis added):
“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to COVID-19 as face-to-face contact within six feet with a patient with symptomatic COVID-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching COVID-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”
Meanwhile, a 2015 study found cloth masks, when compared to surgical masks, increase the rate of influenza-like illnesses by 13 times! Cloth masks are probably best avoided and should not be reused without properly sanitizing them.
Regular surgical masks are not much better. The COVID-19 virus is 0.125 µm in size. Surgical masks have been shown to not adequately filter against aerosols measuring from 0.9-3.1 µm. Other researchers have shown that particles from 0.04-0.2 µm can penetrate surgical masks.
“A face cloth mask is essentially the same as trying to stop mosquitoes with a chainlink fence,” says Mr. Kennedy.
For more details about the myth of mask protection, read Dr. Tenpenny’s article on masks: go here.
Massive Manipulation Exposed
Many of us don’t remember any country being put into lockdown or introducing social-distancing in a bad flu year or because of tuberculosis.
Dr. Knut Wittkowski, former Head of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design at Rockefeller University’s Center for Clinical and Translational Science supports the idea of exposing a population to a virus to induce community-based, natural herd immunity. Interviewed by The Press and The Public Project in April 2020, he stated (emphasis added):
“With all respiratory diseases, the only thing that stops the [spread of] disease is herd immunity. About 80 percent of the people need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even have recognized that they were infected, or they had very, very mild symptoms, especially if they are children. So, it’s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get herd immunity as fast as possible…”
The evidence makes it clear to me that we’re being manipulated. Dr. Vernon Coleman, MD, of the United Kingdom noted back in March, as highlighted in James Perloff’s book COVID-19 and the Agendas to Come, Red-Pilled:
“The panic and the hysteria are wildly overblown. There really isn’t any need to stop all non-urgent operations and there’s no need to close shops and cafes and put people out of work, which is what’s going to happen; the economies all around the world are going to be in a terrible state. Loads of people are going to lose their jobs, and when people lose their jobs, then the death rate goes up; there’s a well-known correlation between unemployment and death rates.”
By the end of May, more than 40 million Americas had filed unemployment claims since mid-March. Calls to suicide hotlines were up 600 percent, and liquor sales 300 to 600 percent, according to a May,2020 letter sent to President Trump by more than 500 doctors, urging him to end the lockdown, which they called a “mass casualty incident.”
We were told it would take two weeks of lockdown to flatten the curve, but in reality, the lockdowns have caused exponentially more harm than the coronavirus. As Trump has said, the ‘cure’ – masks, distancing, tracing, shutdowns, terrorizing children, dividing families – is must worse than the disease.
Does Fauci care about our health?
“For Fauci, pandemic planning is about selling vaccines. As part of this goal, he spent money on ‘weird’ Gain of Function (GOF) studies,” says Kennedy.
In 2019, the National Institutes of Health, with backing from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), committed to spending $3.7 million over the course of six years for research, some of which was the gain of function variety. This came on top of a different $3.7 million, a five-year project that involved collecting bat coronaviruses and studying them. The first program funded virologist Shi Zheng-Li and other researchers at the Wuhan Lab and came to a close last year.
Retired U.S. Army Reserve Col. Lawrence Sellin (Ret.) penned an article calling for a full investigation into NIAID, its leader Anthony Fauci, and the communist Chinese regime, as it appears the three conspired to unleash the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) into the world. Writing for the Citizens Commission on National Security (CCNS), Sellin presents a compilation of evidence to suggest that Fauci played a key role in not only exposing the world to the p*andemic but also in getting it funded through large, taxpayer-funded grants given by his department to the controversial Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
During Fauci’s career, which has spanned six presidencies and 36 years, there is no shortage of ethics and patient safety controversies, as well as numerous citations for violating contract “time” and “amount” rules and the Anti-Deficiency Act, a federal law.
“An accurate accounting of the countless deaths, widespread disease and community destruction, damage to the national and state economies, societal collapse and citywide devastation, bankrupted businesses and ruined families, etc. is simply too long to list here,” writes The Millennium Report. “Nevertheless, when the damage is finally assessed, few individuals on the national stage will be found as culpable as Dr. Anthony Stephen Fauci.”
Big Pharma | Dems The Brakes
What Happened To The Democratic Party? It was a priceless question recently asked by someone who always referred to herself as a life-long democrat…until she realized that those who make up the party are no longer reasonable and have arguably lost their souls to Big Pharma.
In a nutshell, says Kennedy, campaign finance laws were overturned by Buckley vs Valeo and when Reagan won, he signed the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program NCVICP into law in 1986.
“Democrats have long positioned themselves in a knee-jerk posture of protecting those agencies from Republican insults,” explains Mr. Kennedy. “Democrats aligned with people who worked in government agencies, who were on our side regarding guns, children’s health, abortion, etc. And then, as Republicans slowly hollowed out those agencies and made them sock puppets for industry, Democrats did not recognize that process.”
And that’s exactly what happened with Tony Fauci, continues Mr. Kennedy.
“He’s an industry representative, not a regulator. And then when Obama was in power, the democrats made a deal with pharma and said, ‘Ok, if we get Obama Care through, we will make it so we cannot negotiate drug prices with you. We’ll pay whatever it is that you want.’ That’s how the Democrats got Big Pharma on board to push Obama Care. That was the first time democrats started taking pharmaceutical money. Unlike the Republicans, [up until then] they did not take money from the industry, they only took money from labor unions and trial lawyers.”
Changing Legal Landscape
When we spoke on September 20, Ruth Bader Ginsburg had just passed away. Mr. Kennedy wrote a eulogy on Instagram touting the supreme court justice as a medical freedom champion for her dissent in the Bruesewitz v. Wyeth decision in 2011.
Hannah Bruesewitz, the daughter of the main petitioners in the case, received Wyeth’s Tri-Immunol DTP vaccine as part of childhood immunizations. The Bruesewitzes claimed that Hannah’s seizures and later developmental problems came from the vaccine. They filed suit in the “Vaccine Court,” a special court within the United States Court of Federal Claims. Their petition was dismissed for failure to prove a link between the vaccine and Hannah’s health problems.
The Court, in a 6-2 opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, held that the “plaintiffs design defect claims [were] expressly preempted by the Vaccine Act.” The decision by the Court affirmed that vaccine manufacturers are not liable for vaccine-induced injury or death if they are “accompanied by proper directions and warnings.”
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ginsburg said that Scalia’s opinion caused “considerable violence to the statutory texts, misconstrued the legislative history and drew all the wrong conclusions” from the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.
Ginsburg wrote that “Scalia’s decision made vaccines immensely profitable and gave blanket immunity to the 72 mandated doses of unnecessary, untested, risky, zero liability vaccines now on the mandatory schedule.”
It’s not very common for those in office to stand firm against Big Pharma or vaccine manufacturers. Consider that in 2016, when Trump ran for president, he openly stated that vaccines might be linked to autism. Shortly thereafter, the pharmaceutical industry helped craft the democratic narrative, adds Bobby that “This is anti-science. They purported that this comment was like the ‘rest of his anti-intellectual stuff and his rhetoric as a climate-denier.’”
Recognizing the Pandemic was Planned
COVID-19, at peak lethality, imposed a 0.26% death rate. Today on the heels of an election, many of us, including Bobby Kennedy, Jr. realize that this manufactured pandemic being used to finalize a true Orwellian, authoritarian and totalitarian society that rewards corruption, censorship, oppression, collusion and eliminates our liberties and right to bodily autonomy.
We must resist the international agenda that is being imposed on the citizens of the world, an agenda which includes legalized spying, restriction of travel and local mobility, mandatory vaccination, expansion of 5G, and the transition to a digital, cashless society.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text DRT to 22828
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Maryam Henein is a Canadian-born investigative journalist, activist, functional medicine consultant, filmmaker and founder of HoneyColony. She directed the documentary Vanishing of the Bees narrated by Ellen Page Early life and education. Follow her on Twitter @maryamhenein and youtube.com/maryamheneinbeelady
Photo credit: 185150212 © | Dreamstime.com