vaxxter--2020-01-21--Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement, and Government Betrayal at the

This is the shockingly true story of Poul Thorsen , a Danish researcher-turned-opportunist , infiltrated his way into the CDC and embezzled over one million dollars of grant money from the agency before getting caught .
This is also the story of a corrupt government agency tasked with protecting the American public from infectious disease .
Instead of protecting children , the CDC chose to purposefully pull the wool over the public ’ s eyes with a wholly nefarious agenda .
They hired Thorsen to design a new study to debunk a neurological link between autism and thimerosal .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previous safety studies on thimerosal-containing vaccines ( TCV ’ s ) .
The CDC was determined to bury this data while keeping their hands clean and Thorsen was their man .
The collateral damage left in the wake of that decision is reflected in the poor health of our nation ’ s own children .
The CDC chose to wage war on the children of the United States because of their own greed .
You might be outraged after reading this book and may ask the question I did : Why don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The book is broken into three sections , with eight chapters in each section .
In addition , there is a three-chapter epilogue .
The chapters traverse time , moving back and forth covering the period from 1998 to 2015 .
Rather than follow a linear timeline , the book covers notable events and continues to return back to those events to draw necessary conclusions .
Grundvig calls out the players in this unfolding drama and explains how these events continue to take place outside the knowledge of most Americans .
The CDC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is an untouchable agency , thus paving the way for criminal behavior .
The interplay between the key characters is much like watching a movie .
Thorsen ’ s movements , as well as those he regularly came in contact with are tracked over the years by way of Grundvig ’ s personal investigations .
Thorsen ’ s research group , the North Atlantic Neuro-Epidemiology Alliances ( NANEA ) seemed to operate as a front for his shady business dealings , empty promises , and his addiction to money .
He was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Justice on twenty-two counts of fraud .
Grundvig ’ s expose reads somewhat like a novel .
His writing takes on personality dynamics , including thoughts , emotions , projections , and situational contexts to help the reader better understand how human beings can act so cold and callous , with no regard for the health and well-being of innocent children .
Grundvig ’ s writing style adds a broader dimension to give an overall sense of personalities such as Thorsen , Diana Schendel , Julie Gerberding , Frank DeStefano , Bob Chen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Coleen Boyle which brings them to life in their day-to-day operations and roles .
The author ’ s personal disgust is readily apparent .
Much of Grundvig ’ s speculation comes from both second-hand stories , from in-person interviews and from studying the behavioral patterns of these people over an extended period of time .
In addition , he assesses the egregious decisions made by this cast of characters which have impacted the health of millions of children .
It is easy to conclude that greed was the driving impetus for their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they would remain untouchable .
Thorsen is described as “ tall , handsome , with a square jaw framed by wire-rimmed glasses and graying hair combed to the side… ” ( pg .
25 , pdf version ) .
He rose through the academic research ranks , bypassing those with earned merit .
He is described as a slick salesman .
He was soon in a position to exploit the Danish Health Registries where more than 200 health databases were stored , cataloging the diseases and disorders of the Danish population born @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the gateway to the CDC ’ s corruption and Thorsen ’ s criminal activities .
Grundvig gives us the backstory , going all the way back to Thorsen ’ s birth and upbringing .
He recounts the romantic relationship between Thorsen and the unscrupulous Diana Schendel , the CDC epidemiologist working under Coleen Boyle who was the likeliest meal ticket to Thoresen ’ s rising star .
Grundvig pulls no punches as he describes the smarmy nature of Thorsen ’ s and Shendel ’ s relationship as well as the character of Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the effects of Agent Orange on Vietnam Veterans and the Vietnamese people .
Boyle , along with Dr. Frank DeStefano cooked the data and more importantly got away with it .
The story continues with the introduction of more manipulators such as Dr. Julie Gerberding , Director of the CDC from 2002 to 2009 .
Gerberding ’ s backstory focuses on her particular shrewdness and ability to play the game without getting her paws dirty .
Gerberding left the CDC to head Merck ’ s vaccine division in a blatant example of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to innocent people .
Today , Thorsen resides in Denmark and works as a scientist for Odense University Hospital .
He is a marked man , but so far , he has not been extradited to stand trial on his indictment .
Only time will tell if he ever will .
In 1999 , a plan was put into place to commoditize the childhood vaccination schedule but a pesky problem arose .
A Belgium doctor , Thomas M. Verstraeten , ran a statistical analysis on TCV ’ s could not make the association @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away .
The increase in speech delays , tics , and motor impairments that are the hallmarks of autism rose sharply with TCV ’ s .
This association paved the way for Thorsen ’ s study and the CDC was happy to bring Thorsen on board .
They welcomed him with open arms and showered him with many amenities .
Their purpose was to protect the vaccine program and its profits at all costs while keeping the American public in the dark .
While Verstraten and DeStefano worked together to massage the data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yeargin-Allsopp appealed to Cordero about bringing Thorsen into the CDC claiming it was ‘ an exciting opportunity ’ to use several of the Danish registries to study the role of the MMR vaccine in autism .
Meanwhile , the adverse effects of thimerosal were already clearly established even though the CDC continued to promote that TCV ’ s were perfectly safe , a blatant lie designed to deceive .
The CDC employed Thorsen to purposefully deceive the American public about the evidence linking mercury in vaccines to autism .
Then , the CDC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gave the CDC and pharma exactly what they wanted , a clean bill for mercury , clearing it of any adverse role in the autism epidemic .
The takeaway is that Thorsen ’ s study IS the last word that the CDC , doctors , the media , and policymakers refer to as the seminal study that “ debunks ” the link between vaccines and autism .
Do you see a problem here ?
The book goes on to show how the events of 9-11 served to affect vaccine policy regarding thimerosal in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ R-TX ) added a secret rider , known as the Lilly Rider , to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 .
The rider shielded pharma giant Eli Lilly from potentially billions of dollars in lawsuits from the parents of autistic children .
The bill was voted on November 25 , 2002 .
Grundvig describes how no one at the CDC seemed to have any idea that this rider was in the bill .
Though another senator tried to overturn the rider in 2003 , the Lilly Rider held .
This documents that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all along .
It wasn ’ t enough to simply tell the public that mercury was removed from vaccines .
More extreme measures had to be taken to protect the pharmaceutical industry .
In spite of what we continue to be told regarding the safety of thimerosal , there is far more to the story .
Master Manipulator is the expansive story of how a falsified , yet defining study , came to pass along with the colorful cast of criminal characters who got away with something no human should ever get away @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contribution in the full understanding of our country ’ s vaccine program and the corruption at the government level .
After reading this book , no reasonable person could possibly believe that the CDC has our best interests at heart , trust that vaccines are “ safe and effective ” or hold that the subject of this book is the only problem with vaccines .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our mailing list .
Or Text MVI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ content writer .
She has contributed to a number of online publications on fitness , nutrition , food , lifestyle , and parenting .
She is an avid reader and book reviewer .
Her work especially promotes indie authors , getting less-known information into the hands of many .
You can find her additional book reviews at her blog , bemisreviewsbooks.com .

Review of Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud, Embezzlement, and Government Betrayal at the CDC by Maria Ryan
This is the shockingly true story of Poul Thorsen, a Danish researcher-turned-opportunist who infiltrated his way into the CDC and embezzled over one million dollars of grant money from the agency before getting caught.
This is also the story of a government betrayal by a corrupt agency, tasked with protecting the American public from infectious disease. But instead of protecting children, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) chooses to purposefully pull the wool over the public’s eyes with a wholly nefarious agenda. They hired Thorsen to design a new study to debunk a neurological link between autism and thimerosal. The neurological links were found in the six previous safety studies on thimerosal-containing vaccines (TCV’s). The CDC is consistent in their goals: bury this data while keeping their hands clean. Thorsen was their man.
The poor health of our nation’s own children is collateral damage in the wake of this decision. The CDC chooses to wage war on the children of the United States because of their own greed. You’ll most likely become outraged after reading this book. You’ll most likely may ask the question I did: Why don’t the masses know about this?
There are three sections to this book, with eight chapters in each section. In addition, there is a three-chapter epilogue. The chapters traverse time, moving back and forth covering the period from 1998 to 2015. Rather than follow a linear timeline, the book covers notable events and continues to return back to those events to draw conclusions.
The Players
Grundvig calls out the players in this unfolding drama and explains how these events continue to take place outside the knowledge of most Americans. The CDC has known for a long time that it is an untouchable agency. This paves the way for criminal behavior. The interplay between the key characters is much like watching a movie. Thorsen’s movements, as well as those he regularly came in contact with are tracked over the years by way of Grundvig’s personal investigations. Thorsen’s research group, the North Atlantic Neuro-Epidemiology Alliances (NANEA) seemed to operate as a front for his shady business dealings, empty promises, and his addiction to money. He was eventually charged by the U.S. Department of Justice on twenty-two counts of fraud.
Grundvig’s expose reads somewhat like a novel. His writing takes on personality dynamics, including thoughts, emotions, projections, and situational contexts to help the reader better understand how human beings can act so cold and callous, with no regard for the health and well-being of innocent children. Grundvig’s writing style adds a broader dimension to give an overall sense of personalities such as Thorsen, Diana Schendel, Julie Gerberding, Frank DeStefano, Bob Chen, Jose Cordero, Marshlyn Yeargin-Allsopp, and Coleen Boyle. This helps bring them to life in their day-to-day roles and operations .
The author’s personal disgust is readily apparent. Much of Grundvig’s speculation comes from both second-hand stories, in-person interviews, and from studying the behavioral patterns of these people over an extended period of time. In addition, he assesses the egregious decisions made by this cast of characters which have impacted the health of millions of children. It is easy to conclude that greed was the driving impetus for their decisions, along with the pompous certainty that they would remain untouchable.
The Slick Salesman
Thorsen is “tall, handsome, with a square jaw framed by wire-rimmed glasses and graying hair combed to the side” (pg. 25, pdf version). He rose through the academic research ranks, bypassing those with earned merit. Grundvig describes Thorsen as a slick salesman. He was soon in a position to exploit the Danish Health Registries where more than 200 health databases were stored. This database catalogs the diseases and disorders of the Danish population born after 1968. These databases served as the gateway to the CDC’s corruption and Thorsen’s criminal activities.
Grundvig gives us the backstory, going all the way back to Thorsen’s birth and upbringing. He recounts the romantic relationship between Thorsen and the unscrupulous Diana Schendel. Schendel was the CDC’s epidemiologist, working under Coleen Boyle who was the likeliest meal ticket to Thoresen’s rising star. Grundvig pulls no punches as he describes the smarmy nature of Thorsen’s and Shendel’s relationship. He also describes the character of Dr. Coleen Boyle, the agent behind hiding the effects of Agent Orange on Vietnam Veterans and the Vietnamese people. Boyle, along with Dr. Frank DeStefano, cooked the data and, more importantly, got away with it.
Untouchable
The takeaway from this for Boyle? The CDC was untouchable. Boyle and DeStefano survived Congress’s interrogation in 1990 regarding Agent Orange. In 2012, Boyle gave testimony before Congress on vaccines’ role in birth defects in the aftermath of the Thorsen scandal. Boyle eventually went on to head the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (NCBDDD). The very same position once held by Dr. Jose Cordero. For her criminality, she was both awarded and rewarded with promotions within the CDC.
The story continues with the introduction of more manipulators such as Dr. Julie Gerberding. Gerberding was director of the CDC from 2002 to 2009. Her backstory focuses on the particular shrewdness and ability to play the game without getting her paws dirty. Gerberding left the CDC to head Merck’s vaccine division in a blatant example of the government-pharma revolving-door policy; a policy that does great harm to innocent people.
Today, Thorsen resides in Denmark and works as a scientist for Odense University Hospital. He is a marked man, but so far, he has not been extradited to stand trial on his indictment. Only time will tell if he ever will.
What Happened?
In 1999, the CDC put a plan into place to commoditize the childhood vaccination schedule. But a pesky problem arose. A Belgium doctor, Thomas M. Verstraeten, ran a statistical analysis on TCV’s and could not make the association between the vaccines and neurological damage go away. The increase in speech delays, tics, and motor impairments that are the hallmarks of autism rose sharply with TCV’s.
This association paved the way for Thorsen’s study and the CDC was happy to bring Thorsen on board. They welcomed him with open arms and showered him with many amenities. Their purpose was to protect the vaccine program and its profits at all costs. All while keeping the American public in the dark. While Verstraten and DeStefano worked together to massage the data in their thimerosal study, Dr. Marshlyn Yeargin-Allsopp appealed to Cordero about bringing Thorsen into the CDC. Her claim being it was “an exciting opportunity” to use several of the Danish registries to study the role of the MMR vaccine in autism.
Meanwhile, the adverse effects of thimerosal were already clearly established even though the CDC continued to promote that TCV’s were perfectly safe, a blatant lie designed to deceive.
The CDC employed Thorsen to purposefully deceive the American public about the evidence linking mercury in vaccines to autism. The CDC didn’t expect to be part of the con. But, Thorsen gave the CDC and pharma exactly what they wanted; a clean bill for mercury, clearing it of any adverse role in the autism epidemic.
The takeaway is that Thorsen’s study IS the last word that the CDC, doctors, the media, and policymakers refer to as the seminal study that “debunks” the link between vaccines and autism. Do you see a problem here?
Government Betrayl: Noteworthy Event
The book goes on to show how the events of 9-11 served to affect vaccine policy regarding thimerosal in America. Senator Dick Armey, (R-TX) added a secret rider, known as the Lilly Rider, to the Homeland Security Act of 2002. The rider shielded pharma giant Eli Lilly from potentially billions of dollars in lawsuits from the parents of autistic children. The bill was voted on November 25, 2002.
Grundvig describes how no one at the CDC claims to have any idea that this rider was in the bill. Though another senator tried to overturn the rider in 2003, the Lilly Rider held. This documents that the harmful effects caused by mercury were well-known all along. It wasn’t enough to simply tell the public that mercury was removed from vaccines. It seems taking extreme measures to protect the pharmaceutical industry is the goal. In spite of what the CDC continues to tell us regarding the safety of thimerosal, there is far more to the story.
Master Manipulator is the expansive story of how a falsified, yet defining study, came to pass along with the colorful cast of criminal characters who got away with something no human should ever get away with. It is also an important contribution in the full understanding of our country’s vaccine program and the corruption at the government level.
After reading this book, no reasonable person could possibly believe that the CDC has our best interests at heart. No one should trust that vaccines are “safe and effective.” And no one should hold that the subject of this book is the only problem with vaccines.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our mailing list. Or Text MVI to 555888
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Maria Ryan is a freelance content writer. She has contributed to a number of online publications on fitness, nutrition, food, lifestyle, and parenting. She is an avid reader and book reviewer. Her work especially promotes indie authors, getting less-known information into the hands of many. You can find her additional book reviews at her blog, bemisreviewsbooks.com.


vaxxter--2020-01-24--Fighting for Your Rights in Ohio

Fighting for Your Rights in Ohio

In the fight to preserve our parental rights and bodily autonomy , it ’ s easy to get caught up in the pain of our own experiences , especially when it involves the welfare of our children .
However , personal liberties and the tenants of our Bill of Rights are being threatened and removed across multiple fronts .
Even more striking are the tactics being used to vilify advocates in the various causes of liberty .
We are seeing an overlap between various activist and personal rights groups .
Similar tactics are being used to censor and discredit medical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ groups .
Any messages that are not lockstep with mainstream propaganda are being attacked and labeled “ fake news ” from “ fringe extremists.
” What has become quite disturbing is an apparent infiltration by those who claim to be “ advocates ” for medical freedom .
After observing their demeanors and behaviors , many of these “ pop up ” organizations seem to be using “ divide and conquer ” strategies instead of building upon what has already been accomplished at the legislative level by state medical freedom groups across the country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see the unfolding and reshaping of public opinion here in Ohio and throughout the country .
Learn to tell the difference between fear-mongering , false claims , and strategic distortions of truth .
Remember that we are government BY the people , FOR the people .
If you don ’ t like what you ’ re seeing from your elected officials , then STEP UP and TAKE ACTION to UNSEAT THEM .
If you want to maintain your freedom , then you have to be part of the process .
From Dr. Sherri @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up to volunteer for – and donate to – the state Medical freedom/ parental rights organization in YOUR STATE that is making medical freedom and the right to refuse as part of the mainstream platform .
OhioAMF offers voter guides as a way to educate the public and hold legislators accountable .
It ’ s time to put the reins of government back into the people ’ s hands .
Please donate to www.OhioAMF.org I was a founding member of this group .
OhioAMF is the only group I fully support for legislative @ @ @ @

By Stephanie Stock, President of OhioAMF
In the fight to preserve our parental rights and bodily autonomy, it’s easy to get caught up in the pain of our own experiences, especially when it involves the welfare of our children.
However, personal liberties and the tenants of our Bill of Rights are being threatened and removed across multiple fronts. Even more striking are the tactics being used to vilify advocates in the various causes of liberty.
We are seeing an overlap between various activist and personal rights groups. Similar tactics are being used to censor and discredit medical freedom, Second Amendment and civil liberty groups. Any messages that are not lockstep with mainstream propaganda are being attacked and labeled “fake news” from “fringe extremists.”
What has become quite disturbing is an apparent infiltration by those who claim to be “advocates” for medical freedom. After observing their demeanors and behaviors, many of these “pop up” organizations seem to be using “divide and conquer” strategies instead of building upon what has already been accomplished at the legislative level by state medical freedom groups across the country.
Keep a watchful eye as you see the unfolding and reshaping of public opinion here in Ohio and throughout the country. Learn to tell the difference between fear-mongering, false claims, and strategic distortions of truth.
Remember that we are government BY the people, FOR the people. If you don’t like what you’re seeing from your elected officials, then STEP UP and TAKE ACTION to UNSEAT THEM. If you want to maintain your freedom, then you have to be part of the process.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: I encourage people to step up to volunteer for – and donate to – the state Medical freedom/ parental rights organization in YOUR STATE that is making medical freedom and the right to refuse as part of the mainstream platform. OhioAMF offers voter guides as a way to educate the public and hold legislators accountable. It’s time to put the reins of government back into the people’s hands. Please donate to www.OhioAMF.org I was a founding member of this group. OhioAMF is the only group I fully support for legislative efforts in Ohio.
#MakeLegislatorsWork4YouAgain
#DontCaliforniaMyOhio
#ParentalRightsOverPharmaProfits
#MakeLegislatorsWork4YouAgain
#MedicalFreedom2020


vaxxter--2020-01-16--My New Year’s Resolution Part II: Read the Labels and Throw Out that Old ‘Whine’

Part II : What ’ s next for this tuberculosis vaccine ?
In Part I of my review of a tuberculosis ( TB ) vaccine trial , reported in the New England Journal of Medicine ( NEJM ) , among other things , I showed that statistically , we can not say with any degree of certainty that the GlaxoSmithKline ( GSK ) vaccine M72/AS01E reduces TB disease rates .
Here in Part II , I flesh out more details about TB rates in Southern Africa .
I ’ ll also show how the numbers generated by Tait et al @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine actually caused more illness than should have occurred if the subjects had no injections .
More About TB in Southern Africa What do we know about the incidence of real cases of TB in Southern Africa ?
A variety of organizations , institutes , and governments track and report on cases of tuberculosis at the national level .
Using data readily available to the public , I found that of these three nations , Kenya , Zambia , and South Africa , perhaps Kenya has the highest rate of tuberculosis .
Kenya @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its adult population , although it is only about 2.9 across all ages .
One 2016 study 2016 estimates that the rate TB disease for adults in Zambia to be around 4.5 per 1000 ( with a range of 2.3 to 7.7 ) .
South Africa has about 5.2 TB cases per 1000 nationally .
And in children under the age of 15 , the incidence is only 7 % .
Those numbers fall within the extremes of the results found by Tait et al .
( 2019 ) .
But recall , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HIV negative .
So what is the estimated incidence of TB in that sub-national cohort ?
Using data from WHO , I factored out the comorbidity ( TB and HIV+ ) and derived estimates for the TB rates of the HIV negative adult populations in each nation .
Kenya reports that 27 % of her TB cases are HIV+ .
So I estimate their HIV- TB rate at 3.8 per 1000 .
Tuberculosis in South Africa affects only 2.1 per 1000 who are HIV- .
Within its HIV- population , Zambia sees a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the HIV negative populations of Zambia and South Africa , their TB disease rate is lower than those who received two injections in this GSK vaccine trial ] .
These baseline numbers are important because they give us the means to evaluate the true efficacy of the vaccine protocol .
But we should also consider the trends .
In Kenya , the WHO says that TB peaked in 2006 , at 6 per 1000 – and has dropped ever since .
Conversely monitors for Bacille Calmette Guerin ( BCG ) Atlas said that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kenya was only 2.3 per 1000 ( i.e.
, lower than present-day ) .
Taking a broad view then , if we can appreciate that in the recent past , the incidence of TB in Kenya has dropped , we have reason to expect that samples will exhibit variability .
The numbers and estimates for disease rates go up and down , just like we find in the United States with outbreaks of measles , pertussis , parapertussis , and mumps .
South Africa saw its recent peak for TB infections in 2011 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , when Kenya was at a nadir , South Africa was hitting a crest .
Yet both countries were , and continue to , vaccinate babies with BCG .
Is there any efficacy in giving the shots ?
The adult subjects for this GSK vaccine trial were enrolled from August 2014 through November 2015 .
That is , the TB rates of the test subjects should reflect the national samples estimates which used data from 2018 .
Though Tait et al .
fail to disclose the exact proportions of participants by gender in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ estimates and re-evaluate the efficacy of the GSK injectable .
( Note : my evaluations are skewed because real-world data show that in these countries , men have much higher TB disease rates than women ) .
In Table 2 , Tait et al .
( 2019 ) share the nationalities of those in the placebo group as : 1344 from South Africa ; 71 from Zambia ; and 248 from Kenya .
Putting the pieces together , using TB incidence rates for the HIV negative adult population in each country , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about 2.7 years ( the average number of years each test subject was in the study ) , how many in the placebo group , should have been diagnosed as ill with TB .
We would expect 4.3 cases of active TB per 1000 people for the study ’ s duration of 2.7 years .
Given these 1663 subjects endured 4463.07 person-years , the expected number of TB cases was 0.096 per 100 person-years !
Yes , you read that correctly .
By my analysis , the numbers for a true placebo group @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tait et al .
generated in their two-dose group .
And by definition , via their experiment , Tait et al .
made more than 20 people sick with TB , for no reason other than they injected them with an experimental vaccine and a so-called placebo .
What was in the vaccine ?
What was used as a placebo ?
The injectable in the study is called M72/AS01E .
According to the WHO , “ M72/AS01E is … comprised of an immunogenic fusion protein ( M72 ) derived from two Mycobacterium tuberculosis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ MTB39A ) , and the [ GSK ] proprietary adjuvant AS01E.
” And just in case you – or anyone else – might be worried about the harms of the adjuvant , the WHO press release adds : AS01E is the same adjuvant used in Shingrix , GSK vaccine for shingles , as well as in the new , experimental malaria vaccine RTS , S/AS01E .
To paraphrase the character Jack Torrance from the film , The Shining , “ See , that adjuvant is okay .
We ’ ve seen it used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the expected TB numbers for the HIV negative adult populations of South Africa , Zambia , and Kenya who had no treatment , and were not in the study , was lower than the treatment group , what are we to conclude ?
Ceteris paribus , because of this study , we now know that either the adjuvant , the fusion protein M72 , and or the other unpublished ingredients in the vaccine , individually or synergistically , reduce real immunity and promote illness .
In their synopsis of Tait et al .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the researchers do not know how this vaccine works or whether stimulation of antibodies generates immunity .
Obviously M72/AS01E does not reduce susceptibility to tuberculosis .
But curiously , writers for WHO insist that the M72/AS01E vaccine provides protection .
They write : Keep in mind that their definition of “ protection ” is simply the presence of an antibody , which is the marker they will track for the next 3 years .
But we know from the numbers that this vaccine does not prevent disease .
And frankly , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a 2015 article from the Journal of Clinical and Vaccine Immunology , Orme writes : “ At this time , a tuberculosis vaccine that could induce a form of immunity that , even years later , would prevent infection rather than disease is purely theoretical.
” So we know that theoretically , a TB vaccine might prevent disease , but none could prevent TB infection .
Thus by injecting babies with BCG , millions of defenseless infants are needlessly infected each year with Mycobacterium bovis , a bacteria that causes tuberculosis in cows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the NEJM , GSK , and all the other stakeholders want us to put faith in their vaccines .
It turns out that years ago , in 1978 and 1981 , two teams found the key to remediation for TB patients .
They demonstrated that they could kill “ strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ” with “ immunologically activated macrophages ” when the macrophages were stimulated with hydrogen peroxide .
See Grange et al .
( 1983 ) , references 35 and 36 .
And there it is .
For forty years real @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eliminate a bacteria .
But something as simple as a high pH environment , and an infusion of oxygen in the form of H O ( hydrogen peroxide ) will provide the body the fuel it needs to kill off this harmful bacteria .
See Grange et al .
( 1983 ) , references 35 and 36 .
These experiments and the resulting data show clearly : vaccines cause harm and vaccines are unnecessary for health and disease prevention .
This year , I urge you to start a new tradition : Read @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Calculate the statistics yourself .
Let big pharma and the mis-leadership class know , “ We won ’ t get fooled again.
” Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our list .
Or join our list by follow the prompts John C. Jones received his law degree ( 2001 ) and his Ph.D. is in political science ( 2003 ) from the University of Iowa .
He has over 15 years of research and writing ( both academic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy and law , criminal and Constitutional law , and philosophy of science and medicine .
His additional areas of expertise and specialized knowledge include applied statistics , etymology , political communications/public relations , litigation and court procedure .
He has a particular interest in the science and history of vaccines .

by John Jones, JD, Ph.D., Vaxxter Contributor
Part II: What’s next for this tuberculosis vaccine?
In Part I of my review of a tuberculosis (TB) vaccine trial, reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), among other things, I showed that statistically, we cannot say with any degree of certainty that the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) vaccine M72/AS01E reduces TB disease rates.
Here in Part II, I flesh out more details about TB rates in Southern Africa. I’ll also show how the numbers generated by Tait et al. (2019) prove that the vaccine actually caused more illness than should have occurred if the subjects had no injections.
More About TB in Southern Africa
What do we know about the incidence of real cases of TB in Southern Africa?
A variety of organizations, institutes, and governments track and report on cases of tuberculosis at the national level. Using data readily available to the public, I found that of these three nations, Kenya, Zambia, and South Africa, perhaps Kenya has the highest rate of tuberculosis. Kenya rate is roughly 5.5 per 1000 in its adult population, although it is only about 2.9 across all ages. One 2016 study 2016 estimates that the rate TB disease for adults in Zambia to be around 4.5 per 1000 (with a range of 2.3 to 7.7). South Africa has about 5.2 TB cases per 1000 nationally. And in children under the age of 15, the incidence is only 7%.
Those numbers fall within the extremes of the results found by Tait et al. (2019). But recall, they only used test subjects who were HIV negative. So what is the estimated incidence of TB in that sub-national cohort? Using data from WHO, I factored out the comorbidity (TB and HIV+) and derived estimates for the TB rates of the HIV negative adult populations in each nation. Kenya reports that 27% of her TB cases are HIV+. So I estimate their HIV- TB rate at 3.8 per 1000. Tuberculosis in South Africa affects only 2.1 per 1000 who are HIV-. Within its HIV- population, Zambia sees a mere 1.6.
[Note: for the HIV negative populations of Zambia and South Africa, their TB disease rate is lower than those who received two injections in this GSK vaccine trial].
Vaccine Efficacy Protocol
These baseline numbers are important because they give us the means to evaluate the true efficacy of the vaccine protocol. But we should also consider the trends. In Kenya, the WHO says that TB peaked in 2006, at 6 per 1000 – and has dropped ever since. Conversely monitors for Bacille Calmette Guerin (BCG) Atlas said that in 2011, the TB rate in Kenya was only 2.3 per 1000 (i.e., lower than present-day). Taking a broad view then, if we can appreciate that in the recent past, the incidence of TB in Kenya has dropped, we have reason to expect that samples will exhibit variability. The numbers and estimates for disease rates go up and down, just like we find in the United States with outbreaks of measles, pertussis, parapertussis, and mumps.
South Africa saw its recent peak for TB infections in 2011, at 8.3 per 1000. Thus, when Kenya was at a nadir, South Africa was hitting a crest. Yet both countries were, and continue to, vaccinate babies with BCG. Is there any efficacy in giving the shots?
The adult subjects for this GSK vaccine trial were enrolled from August 2014 through November 2015. That is, the TB rates of the test subjects should reflect the national samples estimates which used data from 2018. Though Tait et al. fail to disclose the exact proportions of participants by gender in each group, we can make some estimates and re-evaluate the efficacy of the GSK injectable.
(Note: my evaluations are skewed because real-world data show that in these countries, men have much higher TB disease rates than women).
The Real Numbers
In Table 2, Tait et al. (2019) share the nationalities of those in the placebo group as: 1344 from South Africa; 71 from Zambia; and 248 from Kenya.
Putting the pieces together, using TB incidence rates for the HIV negative adult population in each country, we can estimate, over the course of about 2.7 years (the average number of years each test subject was in the study), how many in the placebo group, should have been diagnosed as ill with TB. We would expect 4.3 cases of active TB per 1000 people for the study’s duration of 2.7 years. Given these 1663 subjects endured 4463.07 person-years, the expected number of TB cases was 0.096 per 100 person-years!
Yes, you read that correctly.
By my analysis, the numbers for a true placebo group would have been far lower than what Tait et al. generated in their two-dose group. And by definition, via their experiment, Tait et al. made more than 20 people sick with TB, for no reason other than they injected them with an experimental vaccine and a so-called placebo.
What was in the vaccine? What was used as a placebo?
The injectable in the study is called M72/AS01E. According to the WHO,
“M72/AS01E is … comprised of an immunogenic fusion protein (M72) derived from two Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) antigens (MTB32A and MTB39A), and the [GSK] proprietary adjuvant AS01E.”
And just in case you – or anyone else – might be worried about the harms of the adjuvant, the WHO press release adds:
AS01E is the same adjuvant used in Shingrix, GSK vaccine for shingles, as well as in the new, experimental malaria vaccine RTS,S/AS01E.
To paraphrase the character Jack Torrance from the film, The Shining, “See, that adjuvant is okay. We’ve seen it used on other people.” But given that the expected TB numbers for the HIV negative adult populations of South Africa, Zambia, and Kenya who had no treatment, and were not in the study, was lower than the treatment group, what are we to conclude?
Ceteris paribus, because of this study, we now know that either the adjuvant, the fusion protein M72, and or the other unpublished ingredients in the vaccine, individually or synergistically, reduce real immunity and promote illness.
Avoiding Distraction and Looking Ahead
In their synopsis of Tait et al. (2019), the WHO admits that the researchers do not know how this vaccine works or whether stimulation of antibodies generates immunity. Obviously M72/AS01E does not reduce susceptibility to tuberculosis. But curiously, writers for WHO insist that the M72/AS01E vaccine provides protection. They write:
“The study has demonstrated protection approximately during two years of study follow up. The final analysis of the study is expected to provide data on protection during 3 years of follow-up.”
Keep in mind that their definition of “protection” is simply the presence of an antibody, which is the marker they will track for the next 3 years. But we know from the numbers that this vaccine does not prevent disease. And frankly, the research world knows it too.
Prevent Disease But Not Infection
In a 2015 article from the Journal of Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, Orme writes:
“At this time, a tuberculosis vaccine that could induce a form of immunity that, even years later, would prevent infection rather than disease is purely theoretical.”
So we know that theoretically, a TB vaccine might prevent disease, but none could prevent TB infection. Thus by injecting babies with BCG, millions of defenseless infants are needlessly infected each year with Mycobacterium bovis, a bacteria that causes tuberculosis in cows but can also infect humans. Nevertheless, the NEJM, GSK, and all the other stakeholders want us to put faith in their vaccines.
It turns out that years ago, in 1978 and 1981, two teams found the key to remediation for TB patients. They demonstrated that they could kill “strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis” with “immunologically activated macrophages” when the macrophages were stimulated with hydrogen peroxide. See Grange et al. (1983), references 35 and 36.
And there it is. For forty years real scientists have known that no vaccine can eliminate a bacteria. But something as simple as a high pH environment, and an infusion of oxygen in the form of H 2 O 2 (hydrogen peroxide) will provide the body the fuel it needs to kill off this harmful bacteria. See Grange et al. (1983), references 35 and 36.
These experiments and the resulting data show clearly: vaccines cause harm and vaccines are unnecessary for health and disease prevention.
This year, I urge you to start a new tradition: Read the studies. Check their numbers. Calculate the statistics yourself. Let big pharma and the mis-leadership class know, “We won’t get fooled again.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow. Join our list.
Or join our list by texting MVI to 555888 – follow the prompts
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
John C. Jones received his law degree (2001) and his Ph.D. is in political science (2003) from the University of Iowa. He has over 15 years of research and writing (both academic and journalistic) in fields of public policy and law, criminal and Constitutional law, and philosophy of science and medicine. His additional areas of expertise and specialized knowledge include applied statistics, etymology, political communications/public relations, litigation and court procedure. He has a particular interest in the science and history of vaccines.
Photo Credit: ID 26651723 © Crazy80frog | Dreamstime.com


vaxxter--2020-03-24--Coronavirus Pt 1: How Soon We Forget – Same Playbook; Different Virus

I have been sitting back , listening to and watching the crushing plan “ they ” have designed for us .
I wrote this post to give you some of my perspective on where I believe we are….and the perspective we should be taking .
I couldn ’ t help by think when this COVID19 blitz started , “ How soon we forget… ” Over the last three weeks , unless you have been cloistered in a monastery in Tibet , you have been bombarded with at least 2.1 billion media mentions regarding a new form of coronavirus that has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a comparison , when Ebola was in the news last year , it received a mere 16.3 million media mentions .
The world economy has been ground to a stop over the pandemic spread of coronavirus SARS-CoV2 , the proper name for the virus .
This name was chosen because the virus is genetically related to the coronavirus responsible for the SARS outbreak of 2003 .
Coronavirus disease 2019 , or COVID-19 , is the illness caused by the SARS-CoV2 virus .
The two terms are used interchangeably but the words are not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronaviruses are named for the crown-like spikes on their surface .
There are 36 coronaviruses in the family Coronaviridae .
These viruses are known to cause respiratory or intestinal infections in humans and some animals .
These common , mostly benign respiratory viruses were first identified in humans in the mid-1960s .
The four coronaviruses that commonly infect people are : These four common human coronaviruses cause 10–20 % of respiratory infections worldwide and are present on all continents .
Most likely , you have been exposed to , and perhaps ill from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in your life and may have some level of natural immunity to this virus .
The first reported case of the “ mysterious flu ” was reported in South China in November 2002 .
Scientists went into high gear to determine the cause of a highly transmissible respiratory infection .
The illness was found to be caused by a highly pathogenic coronavirus and its source was the Guangdong province in China .
Experts were concerned because it had never previously been seen in humans .
Named SARS-CoV , for “ severe acute respiratory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the spread of the virus set off panicked alerts across the globe .
the WHO issued its first global alerts in early March 2003 , even though the majority of cases were limited to the Chinese province .
Ten years later a similar , highly pathogenic coronavirus called the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus ( MERS-CoV ) would emerge in Middle Eastern countries leading to severe respiratory distress syndrome in humans .
Teams of experts were sent to investigate the SARS outbreak .
The hysteria ramped up quickly and within weeks , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unprecedented quarantine order , keeping residents inside their homes .
Shortly thereafter , Mainland China followed suit , closing public schools , cinemas , and libraries in an attempt to stop the spread of the virus .
As more cases began to be reported in Toronto , Canadian health officials warned residents to quarantine themselves , wear masks , and in some cases , just stay home .
Over the six month duration of the pandemic , 8,049 people had tested positive for the virus .
The vast majority of cases occurred in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with a resulting 774 deaths , or close to 10 % of known cases .
In spite of the fact that few people in Canada were affected ( 251 ) and even fewer died ( 43 ) , the Canadian Tourism Board estimated that the SARS epidemic cost the nation ’ s economy $ 419 million .
The Ontario health minister reported that the cost to the province ’ s health-care system , including money spent to develop special clinics and stock them with supplies to protect healthcare workers , was nearly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a significant effect on the airline industry .
Singapore Airlines lost $ 6 million each day during April and May when SARS choked off intra- and inter-Asian travel .
Other less obvious industries throughout the region that suffered during the outbreak were retail sales , hotels , and restaurants .
When translated into an absolute dollar amount , these figures imply that the global economic loss from SARS was close to $ US 40 billion in 2003 .
This figure is much greater than the medical costs of treating SARS patients .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – SARS-CoV has never been seen again – a new pandemic was coming to the forefront .
But this time , it was an influenza virus , H5N1 , that was gaining the attention of the WHO and the mainstream media .
Influenza A subtypes have been designated as either mildly pathogenic , meaning they cause minimal or no disease , or highly pathogenic , meaning their presence has been associated with widespread infection .
Since the 1980s , all outbreaks of highly pathogenic influenza has been caused by antigen subtypes H5 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ definition is an outbreak of a disease occurring over a very wide area , crossing international boundaries and usually affecting a large number of people .
By those standards , the bird flu exploded unto appeared on the world stage in May 1997 through an ironically innocent setting .
A Hong Kong pre-school had set up a small petting zoo on its grounds , making a home for five chickens and eight ducks .
The children were delighted to spend time with their feathered friends .
Several days after the school aviary experience @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The illness and fever progressed rapidly , and the boy ’ s parents rushed him to Victoria Hospital where he was admitted with pneumonia and respiratory distress .
Six days later the child died from complications that included Reye ’ s syndrome , adult respiratory distress syndrome , and multiple organ system failure .
The doctors requested an autopsy but the results were perplexing .
Pathologists found no underlying immunodeficiency or cardiopulmonary disease that would have contributed to the boy ’ s death .
Three months later , the virus was confirmed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surface antigens H5N1 .
In a report published later , researchers held that this particular bird flu virus had not previously caused infection in humans .
Teams from the WHO and the CDC descended on Hong Kong to determine how the boy had been exposed to the bird flu virus and to assess the potential public health impact .
According to investigators , one of the chickens in the petting zoo had died several days before the child ’ s symptoms had appeared .
It was postulated that the boy had been exposed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus had “ jumped species ” and had infected the boy .
In the following days and weeks , officials scrambled to determine if the virus had been infected those who had been exposed to the ill child .
Approximately 2,000 human samples were collected from those who had been in contact with the boy , the school ’ s petting zoo , or the birds from the rural areas ; no additional cases were identified .
Then , second case of H5N1 infection was confirmed in a person Hong Kong , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ following months .
With news of the direct bird-to-human transmission , the CDC and WHO believed the next pandemic had arrived .
Again , is this sounding familiar ?
Throughout the evolving epidemic , China denied the presence of bird flu in chickens or humans .
However , that changed in 2005 when China reported 7 human cases with three deaths to the WHO .
All across the expansive country , millions of farmers were living in close proximity to billions of chickens , the reservoir of the H5N1 virus .
Reporting only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Many virologists around the world have questioned the relative absence of human cases , given there had been 30 highly pathogenic viral outbreaks in poultry across ten provinces throughout 2005 .
China lied twice before ; is there any doubt they could very well be lying now ?
In the spring of 2009 , another pandemic siren sounded across the US and around the world .
This time , it was over a novel strain of influenza A .
When the origin of the virus was found to have originated from pigs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the outbreak became known as “ swine flu ” and the viral nomenclature was H1N1 .
The WHO quickly declared a “ public health emergency of international concern.
” By June , the WHO and the CDC stopped counting cases and declared the outbreak swine flu to be a pandemic .
About that same time , experts around the world were saying that the swine flu was not aggressive enough to cause a worldwide pandemic , noting that the current mortality rate of confirmed cases was 1.6 % in Mexico and only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ At press conferences , various medical experts made remarks such as , “ It is unclear if we need to use vaccines against the swine flu because the virus does not have a pandemic nature , ” and “ Does the world really needs a vaccine for an illness that so far appears mild ?
” Nonetheless , loaded with government funds , the Big Boys in Vaccine Manufacturing plowed ahead .
By September , Pandemrix , made by GlaxoSmithKline ( GSK ) , Focetria , made by Novartis and Arepanrix , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by GSK , was approved for use the following month .
Celvapan , a whole virus vaccine made by Baxter was approved but soon withdrawn from market due to causing extremely high fevers .
All of these vaccines were fast-tracked to market with no long term studies and very small number of test subjects .
Let ’ s take a look at the ingredients* : • Pandemerix : • Adjuvant : AS03 which contains squalene ( 10.69 mg ) , ?
-tocopherol ( 11.86 mg ) and polysorbate 80 ( 4.86 mg ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ MF59 which contains squalene ( 9.75 mg ) , polysorbate 80 ( 1.175 mg ) and sorbitan trioleate ( 1.175 mg ) in a citrate buffer .
• Other Ingredients : egg proteins , thimerosal ( multidose vial only ) , sodium chloride , potassium chloride , potassium dihydrogen phosphate , disodium phosphate dihydrate , magnesium chloride hexahydrate , calcium chloride dihydrate , sodium citrate , citric acid and water for injections .
[ what do all those chemicals do to human cells ? ]
• Arepanrix • Adjuvant : AS03 which contains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ -tocopherol ( 11.86 mg ) and polysorbate 80 ( 4.86 mg ) .
*for a detailed discussion regarding vaccine ingredients , see www.VaccineU.com and the 7-part course on Problematic Ingredients .
The vaccines were very problematic .
In fact , Pandemerix was shown to conclusively be associated with narcolepsy .
More than 1300 people who received a vaccine to prevent the flu developed narcolepsy , an incurable , debilitating condition that causes overpowering daytime sleepiness , sometimes accompanied by a sudden muscle weakness in response to strong emotions such as laughter or anger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to lower the death rate .
The pandemic began to taper off in November 2009 , and by May 2010 , the number of cases was in steep decline .
On August 10 , 2010 , the Director-General of the WHO , Margaret Chan , announced the end of the H1N1 pandemic .
The CDC estimates that between April 12 , 2009 to April 10 , 2010 , there were 60.8 million people infected , with 274,000 hospitalizations , and 12,469 deaths – a mortality rate of 0.02 % due to the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Millions infected ; low mortality rate .
No economic catacalysic events , no “ social distancing ” , no masks .
Another highly pathogenic virus emerged out of Wuhan , China in December 2019 .
SARS-CoV2 , the novel coronavirus , has rapidly spread across the globe and as of this writing , has affected more than 90,000 people worldwide .
Although China launched an early emergency response , the infection rapidly spread .
In early January 2020 , a total of 24 days after the index COVID-19 case in Wuhan , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spreading the virus to that city .
Subsequently , more cases were reported .
From there , the virus seemed to transit the world .
As exponentially more cases were being reported , researchers were analyzing the data being accumulated from lab tests , nasal swabs and stool samples .
What they started to find , was that common coronaviruses were the predominant strain because of their global distribution and their non-negligible mortality .
This full-text article , from the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents , reports this : • None As of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 worldwide , with 3086 deaths ( mortality rate 3.4 % ) .
• None As of 2 March 2020 , among OECD countries , 7476 patients had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 , with 96 deaths ( mortality rate 1.3 % ) • None As of 2 March 2020 , in France , 191 people had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 , with three deaths ( mortality rate 1.6 % ) .
• None Between 1 January 2020 and 2 March 2020 , 7,059 samples were positive for coronaviruses with two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SARS-CoV-2 identified .
The deaths were associated with strain OC43 and the other with strain HKU1 .
Underlying co-morbidities were not lists .
• “ This mortality rate of SARS-CoV2 In European or American developed countries of a comparable economic level the SARS-CoV2 mortality rate is 1.3 % .
This is not significantly different from that for common coronaviruses identified in the study hospital in France .
( mortality rate 0.8 % ; p=0.11 ) • “ In fact , mortality from respiratory infections is extremely dependent on the quality of care and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have better prognosis in countries with superior medical infrastructures.
” • “ Therefore , in OECD countries , SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to be deadlier than other circulating viruses.
” I hope that this historical discussion puts SARS-CoV2 and COVID19 into perspective .
We ’ re hearing the same hysteria , the same fear mongering , the same low death rates .
And this time , we may even have a medication , hydrochloroqin , that eliminates the severe symptoms quickly .
Because the Governor has no constitutional or statutory authority to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ohio Roundtable , a division of the American Policy Roundtable , is calling upon all Ohioans to contact their state lawmakers and urge the immediate passage of four proposals to restore constitutional balance to the Ohio economy and electoral process .
The proposals are : • None An immediate resolution to the illegal cancellation of the Primary Election of March 17th .
• None An immediate repeal of the ODH orders closing Ohio businesses including the “ Stay at Home ” order issued on Sunday , March 22nd .
• None An amendment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ ultimate authority ” of the Department of Health on matters concerning quarantines and isolation .
• None The General Assembly should immediately appropriate funds from the Rainy-Day Fund to create an implementation of the Commission Plan .
This is a one-time expenditure .
All Ohioans should contact their elected representatives by visiting https : //www.legislature.ohio.gov .
Please urge them to adopt the four COVID-19 proposals recommended by the Ohio Roundtable .

by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, AOBNM. ABIHM
I’ve been sitting back, listening to and watching the crushing plan “they” have designed for us. I’ve been viewing this fiasco through the lens of history. I wrote this article to give you some perspective. I couldn’t help but think when this COVID19 blitz started, “How soon we forget.”
Coronavirus Spread
Over the last three weeks, unless you have been cloistered in a monastery in Tibet, you have been bombarded with at least 2.1 billion media mentions regarding a new form of coronavirus that has spread rapidly around the world. As a comparison, when Ebola was in the news last year, it received a mere 16.3 million media mentions.
The world economy has ground to a stop over the pandemic spread of coronavirus SARS-CoV2, the proper name for the virus. This name was chosen because the virus is genetically related to the coronavirus responsible for the SARS outbreak of 2003. The SARS-CoV2 virus is the cause of the coronavirus disease 2019, or COVID-19. The two terms are in use interchangeably but the words are not synonyms.
According to the CDC, coronaviruses are named for the crown-like spikes on their surface. There are 36 coronaviruses in the family Coronaviridae. The viruses cause respiratory or intestinal infections in humans and some animals. These common, mostly benign respiratory viruses were first identified in humans in the mid-1960s.
Besides the three know pandemic viruses that caused SARS, MERS and now COVID19, there are four coronaviruses that commonly infect people are:
229E (alpha coronavirus)
NL63 (alpha coronavirus)
OC43 (beta coronavirus)
HKU1 (beta coronavirus)
These four viruses cause 10–20% of respiratory infections worldwide and are present on all continents. Most likely, you’ve had exposure to, and perhaps ill from, a coronavirus infection at some point in your life. And you may actually have some level of natural immunity to this virus.
Round #1, 2002: SARS—Coronavirus
The first reported case of the “mysterious flu” was reported in November 2002. Scientists went into high gear and found this highly pathogenic coronavirus originating in the Guangdong province in China. Experts were concerned because there were no previous cases in humans before. Named SARS-CoV, for “severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by a coronavirus,” its spread set off panicked alerts across the globe. The WHO issued its first global alerts in early March 2003. The alerts went out even though the majority of cases were mostly in the Chinese province.
Ten years later a similar, highly pathogenic coronavirus called the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) would emerge in Middle Eastern countries leading to severe respiratory distress syndrome in humans.
Teams of experts went to investigate the SARS outbreak. The hysteria ramped up quickly, and within weeks, the Hong Kong Department of Health issued an unprecedented quarantine order. And order to keep residents inside their homes. Shortly thereafter, Mainland China followed suit, closing public schools, cinemas, and libraries. The closures being an attempt to stop the spread of the virus. As reports of more cases came into Toronto, Canadian health officials warned residents to quarantine themselves, wear masks, and in some cases, just stay home.
Over the six month duration of the pandemic, 8,049 people tested positive for the virus. The vast majority of cases occurred in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, with a resulting 774 deaths, or close to 10% of known cases.
But since the total number of cases only represents those ill enough to seek medical help, the actual death rate is unknown and may have been far less.
Economic Implications With Minimal Affected
In spite of the fact that few people in Canada were affected (251) and even fewer died (43), the Canadian Tourism Board estimated that the SARS epidemic cost the nation’s economy $419 million. The Ontario health minister reported that the cost to the province’s health-care system, including money spent to develop special clinics and stock them with supplies to protect healthcare workers, was nearly $763 million.
SARS had a significant effect on the airline industry. Singapore Airlines lost $6 million each day during April and May when SARS choked off intra- and inter-Asian travel. Other less obvious industries that suffered during the outbreak were retail sales, hotels, and restaurants. When translated into an absolute dollar amount, these figures imply that the global economic loss from SARS was close to $40 billion U.S. in 2003. This figure is much greater than the medical costs of treating SARS patients.
Is this sounding familiar?
As SARS-CoV faded into obscurity in 2004, and has never been seen again, a new pandemic was coming to the forefront. But this time, it was an influenza virus, H5N1, that was gaining the attention of the WHO and the mainstream media.
Identifying influenza viruses is based on three distinct immunogenic types—A, B, and C—and a large number of subtypes. Type C viruses are either assymptomatic or very mild respiratory illness and do not carry with them a public health impact. Influenza type B infections also tend to cause minor illnesses. Having a propensity for older persons, influenza type B viruses are most oftenly occur in nursing home outbreaks. Research shows influenza types C and B as only active in humans. Until the emergence of the H5N1 virus, the only influenza A viruses in humans, since 1977, have been H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2.
Influenza A subtypes have been designated as either mildly pathogenic, meaning they cause minimal or no disease. Or they can be highly pathogenic, meaning their presence has been associated with widespread infection. The antigen subtypes H5, H7, and H9 are the cause of all outbreaks of highly pathogenic influenza. This has been the case since the 1980s.
Round #2, 2005: Bird Flu, H5N1
A pandemic by definition is an outbreak of an infection occurring over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and usually affects a large number of people. By those standards, the bird flu exploded onto the world stage in May 1997 through an ironically innocent setting.
It Started in a Zoo
A Hong Kong pre-school had set up a small petting zoo on its grounds, making a home for five chickens and eight ducks. The children were happy to spend time with their feathered friends. Several days after the school aviary experience, a three-year-old boy began to cough. The illness and fever progressed rapidly, and the boy’s parents rushed him to Victoria Hospital where he was admitted with pneumonia and respiratory distress. Six days later, he died.
Pathologists found no underlying immunodeficiency or cardiopulmonary disease that would have contributed to the boy’s death. Three months later, the virus was confirmed to be avian influenza A virus with surface antigens H5N1. In a report published later, researchers held that this particular bird flu virus had not previously caused infection in humans.
Teams from the WHO and the CDC descended on Hong Kong to determine how the boy had been exposed to the bird flu virus and to assess the potential public health impact. According to investigators, one of the chickens in the petting zoo had died several days before the child’s symptoms had appeared. Postulation suggests that there was exposure to the ill bird, meaning, the virus had “jumped species” to infect the boy.
In the following days and weeks, officials began scrambling to determine if the virus infection had spread to those who had come in contact with the ill child. Approximately 2,000 human samples were collected from those who had been in contact with the boy, the school’s petting zoo, or the birds from the rural areas. No additional cases were identified. Then, a second case of H5N1 infection was confirmed in Hong Kong. Then, 18 more cases appeared over the following months. With news of the direct bird-to-human transmission, the CDC and WHO believed the next pandemic had arrived.
Again, is this sounding familiar?
Throughout the evolving epidemic, China denied the presence of bird flu in chickens or humans. However, that changed in 2005 when China reported 7 human cases with three deaths to the WHO. All across the expansive country, millions of farmers were living in close proximity to billions of chickens, the reservoir of the H5N1 virus. Reporting only seven H5N1 human infections seems extraordinarily low. Many virologists around the world have questioned the relative absence of human cases, given there were 30 highly pathogenic viral outbreaks in poultry across ten provinces throughout 2005.
China lied twice before; is there any doubt they could very well be lying now?
Round #3, 2009: Swine Flu (H1N1)
In the spring of 2009, another pandemic siren shrieked across the US and around the world. This time, it was over a novel strain of influenza A. With the origin and discovery of the virus in pigs from a small region in central Mexico, the outbreak became known as “swine flu” and the viral nomenclature was H1N1. The WHO quickly declared a “public health emergency of international concern.” By June, the WHO and the CDC stopped counting cases. The next step was to declare the swine flu outbreak as a pandemic.
About that same time, experts around the world were saying that this H1N1 swine flu virus was not aggressive enough to cause a worldwide pandemic. They noted that the mortality rate among confirmed cases was 1.6% in Mexico and only 0.1% in the United States. At press conferences, various medical experts made remarks such as, “It is unclear if we need to use vaccines against the swine flu because the virus does not have a pandemic nature.” Additional remarks include, “Does the world really needs a vaccine for an illness that so far appears mild?”
Onto the Fast-Track
Nonetheless, loaded with government funds, the Big Boys in vaccine manufacturing plowed ahead. By September, Pandemrix and Arepanrix, both made by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) were approved. Focetria, made by Novartis was also approved for use the following month. Celvapan, a whole virus vaccine made by Baxter was approved but soon withdrawn from market because it caused extremely high fevers.
All of these vaccines were fast-tracked to market with no long term studies and very few test subjects in the trials. Let’s take a look at the ingredients*:
Pandemerix: Adjuvant: AS03 which contains squalene (10.69 mg), polysorbate 80 (4.86 mg) and alpha-tocopherol (11.86 mg) Other ingredients: egg proteins, polysorbate 80, octoxynol 10, thimerosal (mercury), sodium chloride, disodium hydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, potassium chloride, magnesium chloride, water for injections.
Focetia: Adjuvant: MF59 which contains squalene (9.75 mg), polysorbate 80 (1.175 mg) and sorbitan trioleate (1.175 mg) Other Ingredients: egg proteins, thimerosal (multidose vial only), sodium chloride, potassium chloride, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, disodium phosphate dihydrate, magnesium chloride hexahydrate, calcium chloride dihydrate, sodium citrate, citric acid and water for injections. [what do all those chemicals do to human cells?]
Arepanrix Adjuvant: AS03 which contains squalene (10.69 mg), polysorbate 80 (4.86 mg), NS alpha-tocopherol (11.86 mg) Other Ingredients: egg proteins, thimerosal , formaldehyde, sodium deoxycholate, sucrose, sodium chloride, disodium hydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, potassium chloride, water for injections.
*for a detailed discussion regarding vaccine ingredients, see www.VaccineU.com and the 7-part course on Problematic Ingredients.
Ineffective Vaccines
The pandemic vaccines were very problematic. In fact, Pandemerix was later shown to conclusively be associated with narcolepsy. More than 1300 people who received a vaccine to prevent the flu developed narcolepsy, an incurable, debilitating condition that causes overpowering daytime sleepiness, sometimes accompanied by sudden muscle weakness in response to strong emotions such as laughter or anger. Worse, the vaccines did little to lower the death rate.
The pandemic began to taper off in November 2009, and by August 10, 2010, the Director-General of the WHO, Margaret Chan, announced the end of the H1N1 pandemic. The CDC estimates that between April 12, 2009 to April 10, 2010, there were 60.8 million people infected, with 274,000 hospitalizations, and 12,469 deaths—a mortality rate of 0.02% due to the virus.
Again, is this sounding familiar? Millions infected; low mortality rate. No economic cataclysmic events, no “social distancing”, no masks, no community lockdowns.
Round #4, 2020: SARS-CoV2 – Coronavirus2
A third, highly pathogenic virus emerged out of Wuhan, China in December 2019. SARS-CoV2, the novel coronavirus, has rapidly spread across the globe and as of this writing, has affected more than 90,000 people worldwide.
Although China launched an early emergency response, the infection rapidly spread. In early January 2020, a total of 24 days after the index COVID-19 case in Wuhan, a family traveled from Wuhan Shenzhen, spreading the virus to that city. Subsequently, more cases were reported. From there, the virus seemed to transit the world.
Researchers began analyzing the data from lab tests, nasal swabs, and stool samples. Their findings show that common coronaviruses were the predominant strain. This is most likely due to their global distribution and their non-negligible mortality.
The Numbers Don’t Lie
This full-text article, from the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, reports:
As of 2 March 2020, 90,307 patients had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 worldwide, with 3086 deaths (mortality rate 3.4%).
Between 1 January 2020 and 2 March 2020, 7,059 samples were positive for coronaviruses with two deaths. There was no identification of SARS-CoV-2. The strain OC43 and the other with strain HKU1 were the only association with deaths. Underlying co-morbidities were not lists.
As of 2 March 2020, among OECD countries, 7476 patients had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, with 96 deaths (mortality rate 1.3%)
As of 2 March 2020, in France, 191 people had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, with three deaths (mortality rate 1.6%).
“ This mortality rate of SARS-CoV2 In European or American developed countries of a comparable economic level the SARS-CoV2 mortality rate is 1.3% . This is not significantly different from that for common coronaviruses identified in the study hospital in France. (mortality rate 0.8%; p=0.11)
“In fact, mortality from respiratory infections is extremely dependent on the quality of care and access to care , and severe forms have better prognosis in countries with superior medical infrastructures.”
“Therefore, in OECD countries, SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to be deadlier than other circulating viruses.”
I hope that this historical discussion puts SARS-CoV2 and the COVID19 pandemic into perspective. We are watching the same hysteria, the same fear-mongering, the same low death rates. And this time, we may even have a medication, hydroxychloroquine, that eliminates the severe symptoms quickly. Get involved in preserving your right to refuse … because the vaccine is coming, even if the medications work.
In Coronovirus Part 2 – I’ll be discussing the dangerous 2005 PREP Act
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is an osteopathic medical doctor, board-certified in three specialties. She is the founder of Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center, a medical clinic located near Cleveland, Ohio. Her company, Courses4Mastery.com provides online education and training regarding all aspects of vaccines and vaccination.
Dr. Tenpenny has invested nearly 20 years and more than 40,000 hours documenting and exposing the problems associated with vaccines. As an internationally known speaker and author, her many articles have been translated into at least 15 languages. She is a frequent guest on radio and TV to share her knowledge and educate parents on why they should Just. Say .No. to vaccines.
Photocredit:ID 142634156 © Sergeyacros | Dreamstime.com


vaxxter--2020-04-21--It’s a Matter of Trust

It’s a Matter of Trust

There are few things in life more awesome than a mother ’ s protective instinct .
What follows is dedicated to that love , and the power of discernment that accompanies it .
If vaccines were advertised on television , an ad for the DTaP vaccine , for instance , would have to include the following , accurate disclaimer : If your child has had a prior adverse reaction to a DTaP vaccine , an encephalopathy within seven days of a previously administered pertussis-containing vaccine , or has a progressive neurologic disorder , the vaccine is contraindicated .
Your child @ @ @ @ @ @ @ injection site , which may cause muscle pain and fatigue , and , though rare , may trigger development of autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis ( MS ) or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ( ALS , or Lou Gehrig ’ s disease ) ; consult with your doctor at the first sign of any such reaction .
If within twenty-four hours of vaccination the vaccine recipient develops an involuntary cry lasting for several hours , often repeated over the following few days , it may indicate brain inflammation , and may be followed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consult with your doctor .
The DTaP may cause bulging fontanelle in infants .
This typically subsides after a few days , but may indicate brain damage ; consult with your doctor if your child exhibits unusual behaviors .
Also in infants , reports of SIDS have been associated with the vaccine ; do not place your infant face down to nap or sleep until at least sixty days following the last of the three scheduled early infancy DTaP shots .
Your infant may experience any combination of the following reported reactions , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abdominal pain , anaphylactic shock , apnea , autism , bacterial/viral infections , convulsions , disintegrative disorder , coma , abnormal EEG , blood disorders , diabetes , eye movement disorder , hearing loss , trouble walking , narcolepsy , paralysis , pneumonia , impairment of psychomotor skills , screaming , speech disorders and death .
The vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential , or for impairment of fertility.
” The above would be the TV ad disclaimer based on the information provided in the manufacturers ’ own package @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System ( VAERS ) for reported reactions , and information about macrophagic myofasciitis , a syndrome related specifically to injected aluminum adjuvant , an ingredient in the DTaP .
The list of adverse events is incomplete because many adverse vaccine reactions are never reported to VAERS .
Reporting is technically mandatory , but there is no penalty for non-compliance .
Reactions go unreported for no other reason than the widespread reluctance – or refusal – of doctors to acknowledge vaccine reactions .
Ads for every other vaccine would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the disclaimer is loosely styled after the many drug ads we see on TV , unless your doctor has researched vaccines independently , checking with him about reactions would assuredly prove futile .
MDs were denied this information in their medical educations .
Many of the injuries for which the national vaccine court has awarded more than $ 4billion ( and counting ) were related to the DTaP vaccine .
The reactions typically involved vaccine-induced epileptic seizures and other neurologic disorders , in some cases resulting in death .
To quote from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Within one day [ of the DTaP vaccination ] , he developed a fever , which led to a complex febrile seizure .
Subsequently , [ the child ] developed epilepsy .
This fact pattern is commonly seen in the Vaccine Program.
” If this fact pattern is commonly seen in the Vaccine Program , then why is this “ fact pattern ” not common knowledge ?
After all , government agencies , the medical profession , pharmaceutical companies and the mainstream media each have a responsibility to alert the public about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ They all have access to VAERS reports , vaccine package inserts and HRSA ’ s records of the billions of dollars that have been awarded for vaccine injury .
And yet , vaccine safety and harm caused by vaccination is ignored .
This should be a disturbing reality for any parent : Vaccine injuries , some are serious , some are catastrophic , some are fatal .
None of the previously mentioned entities challenges the “ vaccines are safe ” paradigm .
The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines safe as : “ free from harm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ danger , harm or loss .
Many millions of parents who have been told repeatedly that vaccines are safe assume they will do no harm .
But if a vaccination can result in childhood diabetes , it is not “ safe ” .
If vaccines can cause epilepsy , they are not free from risk and they are not “ safe.
” VAERS reports reactions such as tics , speech disorders , and regressive behaviors are associated with the DTaP vaccine .
These are symptoms of autism , a syndrome that can forever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine is not free from harm and is not “ safe.
” There is a terrible dichotomy between the information parents should expect from public agencies and the media and what they actually are told .
There are no doctors , nurses , or CVS pharmacists telling parents the true potential for risk or serious injury from each vaccine they are given .
They simply don ’ t know .
This is a matter of trust .
They ask for consent to inject vaccines into our kids when they don ’ t even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reactions might occur .
Millions of reactions have gone unreported .
A study on the quality of the VAERS database submitted to HHS found that “ fewer than 1 % of adverse events are reported.
” Our medical authorities are quick to point out that correlation isn ’ t causation , scolding us when we suggest a reaction that is temporally associated with a vaccination may have caused the problem .
The fact that they can deny the association is unacceptable .
When they tell us we must vaccinate our kids to get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that those shots can cause diabetes , learning disorder , epilepsy and even death , we demand straightforward information about the associated risks .
Healthcare providers must not make assumptions .
They must stop pushing away parental concerns as irrelevant .
It ’ s an issue of trust , and there can be no question here .
The CDC , the FDA , Health and Human Services , the Children ’ s Hospital of Philadelphia , state health agencies , the American Academy of Pediatrics , many doctors and some journalists are well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine reactions , and that many more thousands of vaccine recipients are going to suffer .
Yet , with a few notable exceptions , they say nothing .
More egregiously , they portray vaccination as safe when they know it ’ s not .
They not only betray our trust , they show it great disdain .
Yes , infectious illnesses can have complications , but it ’ s your liberty to determine which risk is acceptable for your child : the short-term risk of the infection vs. the long-term consequences of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their responsibility to give us complete information about vaccination risks , how can we trust them to be truthful in other areas ?
They can only be trusted to advance the vaccination paradigm .
Like what you ’ re reading on Vaxxter.com ?
Share this article with your friends .
Help us grow .
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888

by Shawn Siegel, Vaxxter Contributor trust in vaccines
There are few things in life more awesome than a mother’s protective instinct. What follows is a dedication to that love and the power of discernment that accompanies it.
The Ideal Disclaimer
If vaccines were advertised on television, an ad for the DTaP vaccine, for instance, would have to include the following, accurate disclaimer:
If your child has had a prior adverse reaction to a DTaP vaccine, an encephalopathy within seven days of a previously administered pertussis-containing vaccine, or has a progressive neurologic disorder, the vaccine is contraindicated. Your child may develop a hard lump at the injection site, which may cause muscle pain and fatigue. And, though rare, may trigger the development of autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, or Lou Gehrig’s disease); consult with your doctor at the first sign of any such reaction. If within twenty-four hours of vaccination the vaccine recipient develops an involuntary cry lasting for several hours, often repeated over the following few days, it may indicate brain inflammation, and may be followed by a lengthy period of regression, consult with your doctor. The DTaP may cause bulging fontanelle in infants. This typically subsides after a few days, but may indicate brain damage; consult with your doctor if your child exhibits unusual behaviors. Also in infants, there are reports of SIDS association with the vaccine; do not place your infant face down to nap or sleep until at least sixty days following the last of the three scheduled early infancy DTaP shots. Your infant may experience any combination of the following reported reactions, some of which may require hospitalization: abdominal pain, anaphylactic shock, apnea, autism, bacterial/viral infections, convulsions, disintegrative disorder, coma, abnormal EEG, blood disorders, diabetes, eye movement disorder, hearing loss, trouble walking, narcolepsy, paralysis, pneumonia, impairment of psychomotor skills, screaming, speech disorders and death. The vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
It’s Already in the Insert
The above would be the TV ad disclaimer based on the information provided in the manufacturers’ own package inserts, a search through the national Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for reported reactions, and information about macrophagic myofasciitis, a syndrome related specifically to injected aluminum adjuvant, an ingredient in the DTaP. The list of adverse events is incomplete because many adverse vaccine reactions never make it into VAERS. Reporting is technically mandatory, but there is no penalty for non-compliance. Reactions go unreported for no other reason than the widespread reluctance — or refusal — of doctors to acknowledge vaccine reactions.
Ads for every other vaccine would be similar. Most disturbing is that while the disclaimer is a loose reflection of the many drug ads we see on TV, unless your doctor researches vaccines independently, checking with him/her about reactions would assuredly prove futile. MDs were denied this information in their medical educations.
Many of the injuries for which the national vaccine court has awarded more than $4 billion (and counting) were related to the DTaP vaccine. The reactions typically involved vaccine-induced epileptic seizures and other neurologic disorders, in some cases resulting in death. To quote from the court records in one such case:
“Within one day [of the DTaP vaccination], he developed a fever, which led to a complex febrile seizure. Subsequently, [the child] developed epilepsy. This fact pattern is commonly seen in the Vaccine Program.”
Isn’t Everyone Responsible?
If this fact pattern is common in the Vaccine Program, then why is this “fact pattern” not common knowledge? After all, government agencies, the medical profession, pharmaceutical companies, and the mainstream media each have a responsibility to alert the public about the potentially serious adverse vaccine reactions. They all have access to VAERS reports, vaccine package inserts, and HRSA’s records. They also have records of the billions of dollars that have been awarded for vaccine injury. And yet, vaccine safety and harm caused by vaccination is ignored.
This should be a disturbing reality for any parent: Vaccine injuries, some are serious, some are catastrophic, some are fatal. None of the previously mentioned entities challenges the “vaccines are safe” paradigm. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines safe as: “free from harm or risk; secure from threat or danger, harm or loss.” Many millions of parents who have been told repeatedly that vaccines are safe, assume they will do no harm.
But if vaccination can result in childhood diabetes, it is not “safe”. If vaccines can cause epilepsy, they aren’t free from risk and they are not “safe.” VAERS reports reactions such as tics, speech disorders, and regressive behaviors as being side effects of the DTaP vaccine. These are symptoms of autism, a syndrome that can forever transform family life. That means the vaccine is not free from harm and is not “safe.”
There is a terrible dichotomy between the information parents should expect from public agencies along with the media, and with what they actually are listening to. There are no doctors, nurses, or CVS pharmacists telling parents the true potential for risk or serious injury from each vaccine their child receives. They simply don’t know.
This is a matter of trust.
Trust Isn’t Singular
They ask for consent to inject vaccines into our kids when they don’t even know the real extent of what adverse reactions might occur. Millions of reactions have gone unreported. A study on the quality of the VAERS database submitted to HHS found that “fewer than 1% of adverse events are reported.” Our medical authorities are quick to point out that correlation isn’t causation, scolding us when we suggest a reaction that is temporally associated with vaccination may have caused the problem. The fact that they can deny the association is unacceptable. They tell us we must vaccinate our kids to get a public education. Yet they ignore that those shots can cause diabetes, learning disorder, epilepsy, and even death. We demand straightforward information about the associated risks. Healthcare providers must not make assumptions. They must stop pushing away parental concerns as irrelevant.
It’s an issue of trust, and there can be no question here. The CDC, the FDA, Health and Human Services, the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, state health agencies, the American Academy of Pediatrics, many doctors, and some journalists are well aware that there are extreme and catastrophic vaccine reactions. They are also aware that many more thousands of vaccine recipients are going to suffer. Yet, with a few notable exceptions, they say nothing. More egregiously, they portray vaccination as safe when they know it’s not. They not only betray our trust, but they also show it great disdain.
Yes, infectious illnesses can have complications, but it’s your liberty to determine which risk is acceptable for your child. You should be able to choose the short-term risk of the infection vs. the long-term consequences of the vaccine. Further, if they shirk their responsibility to give us complete information about vaccination risks, how can we trust them to be truthful in other areas?
Advancing the vaccination paradigm is the only form of trust they can have.
Investigate. Research. They’re your kids.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on Vaxxter.com?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here or text MVI to 555888
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawn Siegel has enough common sense to recognize a con game when he sees one. Thus, he was compelled to begin researching after discovering that immediately following the release of the polio vaccine the CDC radically changed the definition of the illness. He now hosts a weekly radio/internet show, The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust, on the Logos Radio Network.