skynewspolitics--2020-07-22--Harry Dunn death: UK and US agree to end diplomatic immunity 'anomaly'

The UK and US have agreed to end the `` anomaly '' that allowed the woman suspected of causing Harry Dunn 's death to claim diplomatic immunity .
A court heard last month that the `` secret agreement '' permitted Anne Sacoolas to return to her home country after a road crash which killed the 19-year-old in August last year outside RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire .
Despite the document now being amended , Harry 's alleged killer still remains in the US .
His mother Charlotte Charles said the announcement was a `` huge step forward '' - adding that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for this to `` never happen to another family again '' .
But she added their campaign would continue for Ms Sacoolas to be brought back to the UK .
Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said the changes mean a similar tragedy `` could not happen again '' .
He added : `` I know these changes wo n't bring Harry back , and I appreciate the pain and suffering the family are still going through .
`` But I hope this may bring some small measure of comfort to them , because I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ family going through the same ordeal they have . ''
It follows a visit by the US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to the UK this week .
Ms Charles appealed to the government at the weekend to make her son the `` top priority '' during the visit and said she was tired of promises .
`` We 've been assured by Dominic Raab 's team ... that Harry is number one on the agenda , '' she said .
`` Well prove that to us then .
Tell us what they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not enough anymore .
`` There are plenty of things [ Mr Raab ] could do , we need proof of what he 's going to do .
He looks defeatist , he looks like a little lost child in an adult 's world .
Stand up for us , we are UK citizens . ''
A previous request for the extradition of Anne Sacoolas was rejected by the US in January .

The UK and US have agreed to end the "anomaly" that allowed the woman suspected of causing Harry Dunn's death to claim diplomatic immunity.
A court heard last month that the "secret agreement" permitted Anne Sacoolas to return to her home country after a road crash which killed the 19-year-old in August last year outside RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire.
Despite the document now being amended, Harry's alleged killer still remains in the US.
Image: The crash happened at RAF Croughton, a US airbase
His mother Charlotte Charles said the announcement was a "huge step forward" - adding that one of the family's aims was for this to "never happen to another family again".
But she added their campaign would continue for Ms Sacoolas to be brought back to the UK.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 1:16 Charlotte Charles' plea ahead of Pompeo's visit
Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said the changes mean a similar tragedy "could not happen again".
He added: "I know these changes won't bring Harry back, and I appreciate the pain and suffering the family are still going through.
"But I hope this may bring some small measure of comfort to them, because I know they want to prevent any other family going through the same ordeal they have."
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 1:47 Raab: 'Denial of justice' in Harry Dunn case
It follows a visit by the US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to the UK this week.
Advertisement
Mr Raab said Prime Minister Boris Johnson had "made it clear that Anne Sacoolas should return to face justice" when he met with Mr Pompeo in Downing Street on Tuesday.
Ms Charles appealed to the government at the weekend to make her son the "top priority" during the visit and said she was tired of promises.
"We've been assured by Dominic Raab's team...that Harry is number one on the agenda," she said.
"Well prove that to us then. Tell us what they're going to do. Words are not enough anymore.
"There are plenty of things [Mr Raab] could do, we need proof of what he's going to do. He looks defeatist, he looks like a little lost child in an adult's world. Stand up for us, we are UK citizens."
A previous request for the extradition of Anne Sacoolas was rejected by the US in January.


skynewspolitics--2020-07-21--10 things you need to know about the Russia report

A long-awaited parliamentary report into Russian interference in UK politics has finally been released .
So , what does it say ?
Prior to the publication of the Intelligence and Security Committee 's report , some were expecting explosive findings on whether Russia interfered in the 2016 EU referendum .
The committee acknowledged that there have been `` widespread public allegations '' that Russia sought to influence the Brexit vote .
But they judged that `` the impact of any such attempts would be difficult - if not impossible - to assess '' and so they did not seek to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ noted how MI5 initially provided them `` just six lines of text '' when they requested written evidence .
: : Listen to Polonium and the Piano Player on Apple Podcasts , Spotify , Google Podcasts , Spreaker They ruled this was `` indicative of the extreme caution '' that the UK 's intelligence and security agencies had at the thought they might have any role in relation to the UK 's democratic processes , and `` particularly one as contentious as the EU referendum '' .
`` This attitude is illogical ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ process and mechanism from hostile state interference , which should fall to our intelligence and security agencies , '' the committee said .
They called for the UK 's intelligence and security agencies to produce their own assessment of Russian interference in the EU referendum and to publish their findings .
The government has rejected the call .
It said it has `` seen no evidence of successful interference in the EU referendum '' .
The committee said there was `` credible open source commentary '' to suggest that Russia sought to influence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But they said it was only after Russia completed a `` hack and leak '' operation on Democratic Party emails in the US - which occurred a month after the Brexit vote in 2016 - that the government `` belatedly realised the level of threat '' from Moscow in this area .
The committee said it appeared UK intelligence and security agencies `` did learn lessons from the US experience '' and the UK government then `` recognised the Russian threat to the UK 's democratic processes and political discourse '' .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clearly a target '' for Russia disinformation campaigns and attempts at political interference .
However , they said that the UK 's intelligence and security agencies `` do not view themselves as holding primary responsibility for the active defence of the UK 's democratic processes from hostile foreign interference '' .
The committee added the agencies `` appeared determined to distance themselves from any suggestion that they might have a prominent role in relation to the democratic process itself '' .
: : Listen to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government - through the Department for Digital , Culture , Media and Sport - also suggested it was not responsible for an assessment of , or operations against , campaigns by hostile states , the committee said .
`` Overall , the issue of defending the UK 's democratic processes and discourse has appeared to be something of a 'hot potato ' , with no one organisation recognising itself as having an overall lead , '' their report stated .
Ministers took their 'eye off the ball ' on Russia The committee said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time '' that Russia under President Vladimir Putin `` has moved from potential partner to established threat , fundamentally unwilling to adhere to international law '' .
They questioned whether the government `` took its eye off the ball '' because of its focus on counter-terrorism .
`` It was the opinion of the committee that until recently the government had badly underestimated the response required to the Russian threat - and is still playing catch up , '' they said .
The 'new normal ' in 'Londongrad' The committee found that Russian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new normal '' and there are `` a lot of Russians with very close links to Putin who are well integrated into the UK business and social scene , and accepted because of their wealth '' .
`` This level of integration - in 'Londongrad ' in particular - means that any measures now being taken by the government are not preventative but rather constitute damage limitation , '' they added .
The committee noted how the UK `` welcomed Russian money '' following the opening of a new visa route in 1994 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But they said `` few questions - if any - were asked about the provenance of this considerable wealth '' .
The UK government at the time appeared to believe that `` developing links with major Russian companies would promote good governance by encouraging ethical and transparent practices '' , the committee said .
They found this `` was in fact counter-productive '' as it `` offered ideal mechanisms by which illicit finance could be recycled through what has been referred to as the London 'laundromat ' '' .
`` PR firms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and cultural institutions were all willing beneficiaries of Russian money , contributing to a 'reputation laundering ' process , '' the committee added .
The committee called for the government to ensure that social media companies take the use of their networks by hostile states seriously and commit to removing such material .
They urged the government to `` name and shame '' those firms who fail to act .
The committee described Russia 's cyber capability - and its willingness to deploy it maliciously - as `` a matter of grave concern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threat to our national security '' .
Russian links to House of Lords need scrutiny The committee noted how `` several members of the Russian elite who are closely linked to Putin are identified as being involved with charitable and/or political organisations in the UK , having donated to political parties , with a public profile which positions them to assist Russian influence operations '' .
They also highlighted how a number of members of the House of Lords have business interests linked to Russia or work directly for major Russian companies linked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ relationships should be carefully scrutinised , given the potential for the Russian state to exploit them , '' the committee said .
The committee said the `` clearest requirement for immediate action '' is for new laws to give the UK 's intelligence community `` the tools it needs and be put in the best possible position if it is to tackle this very capable adversary '' .
This includes new legislation to tackle espionage , the illicit financial dealings of the Russian elite and the `` enablers '' who support this activity @ @ @ @ @

A long-awaited parliamentary report into Russian interference in UK politics has finally been released. So, what does it say?
Brexit
Prior to the publication of the Intelligence and Security Committee's report, some were expecting explosive findings on whether Russia interfered in the 2016 EU referendum.
That wasn't the case.
Image: The committee called for the UK's spy agencies to assess Russia's influence on the Brexit vote
The committee acknowledged that there have been "widespread public allegations" that Russia sought to influence the Brexit vote.
But they judged that "the impact of any such attempts would be difficult - if not impossible - to assess" and so they did not seek to do so.
Instead, the committee noted how MI5 initially provided them "just six lines of text" when they requested written evidence.
Podcast Podcast , which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Podcast cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the This content is provided by, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enablecookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Podcast cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Podcast cookies for this session only. Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once
:: Listen to Polonium and the Piano Player on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Spreaker
They ruled this was "indicative of the extreme caution" that the UK's intelligence and security agencies had at the thought they might have any role in relation to the UK's democratic processes, and "particularly one as contentious as the EU referendum".
Advertisement
"This attitude is illogical; this is about the protection of the process and mechanism from hostile state interference, which should fall to our intelligence and security agencies," the committee said.
They called for the UK's intelligence and security agencies to produce their own assessment of Russian interference in the EU referendum and to publish their findings.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 2:10 UK 'actively avoided' probing Russian interference in EU referendum
The government has rejected the call.
It said it has "seen no evidence of successful interference in the EU referendum".
Scottish independence
The committee said there was "credible open source commentary" to suggest that Russia sought to influence the Scottish independence referendum in 2014.
But they said it was only after Russia completed a "hack and leak" operation on Democratic Party emails in the US - which occurred a month after the Brexit vote in 2016 - that the government "belatedly realised the level of threat" from Moscow in this area.
The committee said it appeared UK intelligence and security agencies "did learn lessons from the US experience" and the UK government then "recognised the Russian threat to the UK's democratic processes and political discourse".
Combating Russian meddling a 'hot potato'
The committee judged that the UK is "clearly a target" for Russia disinformation campaigns and attempts at political interference.
However, they said that the UK's intelligence and security agencies "do not view themselves as holding primary responsibility for the active defence of the UK's democratic processes from hostile foreign interference".
The committee added the agencies "appeared determined to distance themselves from any suggestion that they might have a prominent role in relation to the democratic process itself".
Podcast Podcast , which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Podcast cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the This content is provided by, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enablecookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Podcast cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Podcast cookies for this session only. Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once
:: Listen to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts, Google podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker
The government - through the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport - also suggested it was not responsible for an assessment of, or operations against, campaigns by hostile states, the committee said.
"Overall, the issue of defending the UK's democratic processes and discourse has appeared to be something of a 'hot potato', with no one organisation recognising itself as having an overall lead," their report stated.
Ministers took their 'eye off the ball' on Russia
The committee said it had been "clear for some time" that Russia under President Vladimir Putin "has moved from potential partner to established threat, fundamentally unwilling to adhere to international law".
They questioned whether the government "took its eye off the ball" because of its focus on counter-terrorism.
"It was the opinion of the committee that until recently the government had badly underestimated the response required to the Russian threat - and is still playing catch up," they said.
The 'new normal' in 'Londongrad'
The committee found that Russian influence in the UK is "the new normal" and there are "a lot of Russians with very close links to Putin who are well integrated into the UK business and social scene, and accepted because of their wealth".
"This level of integration - in 'Londongrad' in particular - means that any measures now being taken by the government are not preventative but rather constitute damage limitation," they added.
London's 'laundromat'
The committee noted how the UK "welcomed Russian money" following the opening of a new visa route in 1994 for foreigners who invested in the country.
But they said "few questions - if any - were asked about the provenance of this considerable wealth".
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 1:26 'Londongrad' is 'laundromat' for Russian money
The UK government at the time appeared to believe that "developing links with major Russian companies would promote good governance by encouraging ethical and transparent practices", the committee said.
They found this "was in fact counter-productive" as it "offered ideal mechanisms by which illicit finance could be recycled through what has been referred to as the London 'laundromat'".
"PR firms, charities, political interests, academia and cultural institutions were all willing beneficiaries of Russian money, contributing to a 'reputation laundering' process," the committee added.
'Name and shame' social media companies
The committee called for the government to ensure that social media companies take the use of their networks by hostile states seriously and commit to removing such material.
They urged the government to "name and shame" those firms who fail to act.
Moscow's cyber capability
The committee described Russia's cyber capability - and its willingness to deploy it maliciously - as "a matter of grave concern" and "an immediate and urgent threat to our national security".
Russian links to House of Lords need scrutiny
The committee noted how "several members of the Russian elite who are closely linked to Putin are identified as being involved with charitable and/or political organisations in the UK, having donated to political parties, with a public profile which positions them to assist Russian influence operations".
Image: A number of members of the House of Lords have business interests linked to Russia
They also highlighted how a number of members of the House of Lords have business interests linked to Russia or work directly for major Russian companies linked to the Russian state.
"These relationships should be carefully scrutinised, given the potential for the Russian state to exploit them," the committee said.
New laws
The committee said the "clearest requirement for immediate action" is for new laws to give the UK's intelligence community "the tools it needs and be put in the best possible position if it is to tackle this very capable adversary".
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 0:43 Russia report 'much ado about nothing' - ambassador
This includes new legislation to tackle espionage, the illicit financial dealings of the Russian elite and the "enablers" who support this activity, the committee added.


skynewspolitics--2020-07-22--PM visits Scotland to promote the union but Scots increasingly eye independence

Boris Johnson is visiting Scotland claiming the `` sheer might of our union '' has strengthened the fight against coronavirus north of the border .
In a trip billed as kick-starting a campaign to save the union , he will tell Scots that if they stick with Britain they will continue to benefit from huge economic support .
But the prime minister 's first visit to Scotland since last December 's election comes as opinion polls suggest a surge in support for independence , with backing for separation now at 54 % .
He is pledging £50m to Orkney , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ help develop the islands ' economic potential , with handouts for space technology and renewable energy .
And during his visit , the PM is also meeting members of the military based in Scotland - and their families - to thank them for their ongoing work in the coronavirus response .
At this week 's cabinet meeting , Mr Johnson ordered his ministers to make more visits to Scotland and boost their low public profiles there in the fight against independence .
But the PM 's own visit has been derided by senior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minister Nicola Sturgeon , who turned 50 on Sunday , joking after the latest poll : `` Nice of Boris to send me a birthday pressie . ''
Speaking ahead of his visit , Mr Johnson said : `` When I stood on the steps of Downing Street one year ago , I pledged to be a prime minister for every corner of the United Kingdom .
`` Whether you are from East Kilbride or Dumfries , Motherwell or Paisley , I promised to level up across Britain and close the opportunity gap @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Spotify , Spreaker `` The last six months have shown exactly why the historic and heartfelt bond that ties the four nations of our country together is so important and the sheer might of our union has been proven once again .
`` In Scotland , the UK 's magnificent armed forces have been on the ground doing vital work to support the NHS , from setting up and running mobile testing sites to airlifting critically ill patients to hospitals from some of Scotland 's most remote communities .
`` And the UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a third of Scotland 's entire workforce and kept the wolves at bay for tens of thousands of Scottish businesses .
`` More than ever , this shows what we can achieve when we stand together , as one United Kingdom . ''
Supporting the prime minister 's claim that the union has been good for Scots , the government said the Treasury has protected more than 900,000 jobs in Scotland and granted thousands of loans to businesses .
In addition , the UK 's armed forces have airlifted critically ill patients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , helped convert temporary hospitals and run mobile testing sites .
The government also claimed the Department of Health and Social Care had procured millions of pieces of PPE to keep Scottish frontline workers safe , on top of £4.6bn given to the Scottish administration to help tackle coronavirus .
But on the eve of the PM 's visit , Ms Sturgeon said : `` I have no plans to meet the prime minister tomorrow .
I am always happy to meet the prime minister if he wants to do so .
`` @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immediate priority of continuing to suppress COVID and I look forward to working with the UK government on that basis .
`` We 've got political disagreements , we 've got disagreements over aspects of Scotland and the UK 's future and I am sure we will continue to discuss those constructively as well . ''
At Westminster , the all-party Scottish Affairs Committee of MPs published an interim report on intergovernmental working during the coronavirus pandemic , claiming it is having a `` profound impact on devolution '' .
Scotland 's First @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a second independence referendum The committee 's chairman , SNP MP Pete Wishart said : `` The coronavirus pandemic has had a devastating impact on both Scotland 's health and economy .
It is also profoundly affecting devolution as the response to the crisis reveals the pre-existing creaking mechanisms .
`` The overlapping responsibilities of policy areas operated by Westminster and Holyrood in the pandemic response make intergovernmental communication absolutely critical in effectively controlling the spread of the virus .
`` This was the cornerstone of the 'four-nation ' approach that served so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
`` But as the focus has shifted from containment to opening-up the economy we are concerned that the structures that made this possible have stopped .
`` We heard that there is a 'void ' in ministerial-level communication and which appears to have occurred around the time that some divergence and confusion in messaging began to emerge .
`` Simple mistakes of not making clear which nations in which new policies apply must not be made again . ''

Boris Johnson is visiting Scotland claiming the "sheer might of our union" has strengthened the fight against coronavirus north of the border.
In a trip billed as kick-starting a campaign to save the union, he will tell Scots that if they stick with Britain they will continue to benefit from huge economic support.
But the prime minister's first visit to Scotland since last December's election comes as opinion polls suggest a surge in support for independence, with backing for separation now at 54%.
Image: Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has been calling for a second independence referendum
He is pledging £50m to Orkney, Shetland and the Western Isles, to help develop the islands' economic potential, with handouts for space technology and renewable energy.
And during his visit, the PM is also meeting members of the military based in Scotland - and their families - to thank them for their ongoing work in the coronavirus response.
At this week's cabinet meeting, Mr Johnson ordered his ministers to make more visits to Scotland and boost their low public profiles there in the fight against independence.
But the PM's own visit has been derided by senior Scottish National Party figures, with First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, who turned 50 on Sunday, joking after the latest poll: "Nice of Boris to send me a birthday pressie."
Ahead of Mr Johnson's trip, she tweeted: "I welcome the PM to Scotland today.
"One of the key arguments for independence is the ability of Scotland to take our own decisions, rather than having our future decided by politicians we didn't vote for, taking us down a path we haven't chosen.
Advertisement
"His presence highlights that."


skynewspolitics--2020-07-22--UK foreign aid budget cut by £3bn 'due to COVID-19' - as MPs leave for summer recess

A cut of nearly £3 billion in the UK 's foreign aid budget - blamed by the government on coronavirus - has sparked a row after it was announced as MPs left Westminster for the summer recess .
Revealing the cut , foreign secretary Dominic Raab said the £15.8bn aid budget - set in law at 0.7 % of national income - would have to fall since the economy is shrinking because of COVID-19 .
`` The UK is experiencing a severe economic downturn as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic , '' Mr Raab said on the last day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said was `` poor practice '' .
He added : `` Given the likely decrease in the size of the economy this year , the prime minister asked me to identify the changes needed to ensure we meet , but do not exceed the 0.7 % commitment .
`` As this commitment is based on our Gross National Income , when the economy shrinks , our official development assistance spend also reduces . ''
Mr Raab 's announcement comes just weeks after Boris Johnson 's controversial decision to axe the International Development Department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mr Raab 's Foreign Office .
The foreign secretary revealed the reduced aid spending in a letter to Labour MP Sarah Champion , who chairs the soon-to-be-axed International Development Select Committee of MPs .
Mr Raab wrote : `` We have been able to ensure that the money we will still spend in 2020 remains prioritised on poverty reduction for the 'bottom billion ' , as well as tackling climate change and reversing biodiversity loss , championing girls ' education , UK leadership in the global response to COVID-19 , and campaigning on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of religious belief .
`` So that we can react to the potential shrinkage in our economy , and therefore a decrease in the value of the 0.7 % commitment ( which is based on the UK 's GNI ) , we have identified a £2.9bn package of reductions in the government 's planned ODA spend so we can proceed prudently for the remainder of 2020 . ''
Condemning the timing of the announcement , Ms Champion said : `` The announcement today raises more questions than it answers .
`` The letter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spending - what is the timescale on this ?
`` If it is with immediate effect , do the projects know or will they find out via the media as DFID staff did about the merger ?
Is there an overarching strategy in place ?
`` Will the evaluation of the impact of these cuts be made public ?
Where is the scrutiny ?
`` Clearly there has been no consultation , but to release this news literally as Parliament rises so there can be no scrutiny by MPs is poor practice .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tomorrow on Apple podcasts , Spotify , Google podcasts and Spreaker Labour 's Shadow international development secretary Preet Gill said : `` As we face the reality of lower GDP , projects and programmes that are not transparent or have been found to have no or limited development impact should be the focus of re-evaluation .
`` Labour wants the aid budget to deliver value for money for British taxpayers and urge the government to make sure it is focused on tackling poverty . ''
Liberal Democrat international development spokeswoman Wendy Chamberlain said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were n't worth the paper they were written on , we now see the callous Tories for who they really are .
`` This devastating cut to international aid is a clear sign that the UK is abandoning the world stage .
Because of this government more children will have their life chances blighted by poverty . ''
A Government spokeswoman said : `` The UK is a global leader in development and we remain committed to meeting our 0.7 % target of Gross National Income .
`` The impact of Covid-19 on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ affects how much 0.7 represents , so we have prioritised our money to ensure we can still make a difference in areas like poverty reduction , tackling climate change and helping to lead the global response to coronavirus . ''

A cut of nearly £3 billion in the UK's foreign aid budget - blamed by the government on coronavirus - has sparked a row after it was announced as MPs left Westminster for the summer recess.
Revealing the cut, foreign secretary Dominic Raab said the £15.8bn aid budget - set in law at 0.7% of national income - would have to fall since the economy is shrinking because of COVID-19.
"The UK is experiencing a severe economic downturn as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic," Mr Raab said on the last day of Commons business - a move MPs said was "poor practice".
Image: Dominic Raab announced the cut on the final day of Commons business before the summer break
He added: "Given the likely decrease in the size of the economy this year, the prime minister asked me to identify the changes needed to ensure we meet, but do not exceed the 0.7% commitment.
"As this commitment is based on our Gross National Income, when the economy shrinks, our official development assistance spend also reduces."
Mr Raab's announcement comes just weeks after Boris Johnson's controversial decision to axe the International Development Department (DFID) and merge it with Mr Raab's Foreign Office.
The foreign secretary revealed the reduced aid spending in a letter to Labour MP Sarah Champion, who chairs the soon-to-be-axed International Development Select Committee of MPs.
Mr Raab wrote: "We have been able to ensure that the money we will still spend in 2020 remains prioritised on poverty reduction for the 'bottom billion', as well as tackling climate change and reversing biodiversity loss, championing girls' education, UK leadership in the global response to COVID-19, and campaigning on issues such as media freedom and freedom of religious belief.
"So that we can react to the potential shrinkage in our economy, and therefore a decrease in the value of the 0.7% commitment (which is based on the UK's GNI), we have identified a £2.9bn package of reductions in the government's planned ODA spend so we can proceed prudently for the remainder of 2020."
Advertisement
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 0:25 PM announces plan to merge DFID with Foreign Office
Condemning the timing of the announcement, Ms Champion said: "The announcement today raises more questions than it answers.
"The letter speaks of delaying activity and stopping some spending - what is the timescale on this?
"If it is with immediate effect, do the projects know or will they find out via the media as DFID staff did about the merger? Is there an overarching strategy in place?
"Will the evaluation of the impact of these cuts be made public? Where is the scrutiny?
"Clearly there has been no consultation, but to release this news literally as Parliament rises so there can be no scrutiny by MPs is poor practice."
:: Listen to The World Tomorrow on Apple podcasts, Spotify, Google podcasts and Spreaker
Labour's Shadow international development secretary Preet Gill said: "As we face the reality of lower GDP, projects and programmes that are not transparent or have been found to have no or limited development impact should be the focus of re-evaluation.
"Labour wants the aid budget to deliver value for money for British taxpayers and urge the government to make sure it is focused on tackling poverty."
Liberal Democrat international development spokeswoman Wendy Chamberlain said: "Despite previous assurances that clearly weren't worth the paper they were written on, we now see the callous Tories for who they really are.
"This devastating cut to international aid is a clear sign that the UK is abandoning the world stage. Because of this government more children will have their life chances blighted by poverty."
A Government spokeswoman said: "The UK is a global leader in development and we remain committed to meeting our 0.7% target of Gross National Income.
"The impact of Covid-19 on the size of our economy this year affects how much 0.7 represents, so we have prioritised our money to ensure we can still make a difference in areas like poverty reduction, tackling climate change and helping to lead the global response to coronavirus."


skynewspolitics--2020-07-22--PM claims there is no 'smoking gun' in Russia report

Boris Johnson has told MPs there was `` no smoking gun '' in the Russia report , as Sir Keir Starmer claimed the prime minister `` sat on '' the `` extremely serious '' document .
The Intelligence and Security Committee 's report into the threat posed by Moscow to UK democracy dominated exchanges between the PM and Labour leader at the final PMQs before the summer recess .
Mr Johnson accused `` Islingtonian Remainers '' of seizing on the report to cast doubt over the vote for Brexit .
Sir Keir told MPs the report demonstrated that Russia `` @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our national security '' and is engaged in `` espionage , interfering in democratic processes and serious crime '' .
Noting that the ISC first sent its report to the PM 10 months ago , the Labour leader asked : `` Given that the threat is described as immediate and urgent why on earth did the prime minister sit on that report for so long ? ''
Mr Johnson hit back , saying when he was foreign secretary he took `` the strongest possible action '' against Russia over the 2018 Salisbury poisonings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` sat on his hands and said nothing while the Labour Party parroted the line of the Kremlin when people in this country were poisoned at the orders of Vladimir Putin '' .
The allegation was disputed by the Labour leader , who told the Commons he `` stood up and condemned what happened in Salisbury '' .
`` I supported the then-prime minister [ Theresa May ] on record , so I 'd ask the prime minister to check the record . ''
The ISC 's report said the government was slow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to British democratic processes and did not properly consider whether Moscow could interfere in the 2016 EU referendum until after the vote .
Ministers `` did not want to know '' and `` actively avoided looking for evidence '' , SNP MP and committee Stewart Hosie claimed .
The report described claims of Russia attempting to meddle in the 2014 Scottish independence vote as `` credible '' in `` potentially the first post-Soviet Russian interference in a Western democratic process '' .
In the wake of its release , Downing Street has promised @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to fight foreign interference , including introducing a `` register of foreign agents '' .
Sir Keir said ministers knew about the need to give the security and intelligence agencies greater powers 18 months ago but did not act .
`` The prime minister sat on this report for 10 months and failed to plug a gap in our laws on national security for a year-and-a-half , '' he said .
The Labour leader told the PM : `` The government has taken its eye off the ball - arguably it was n't @ @ @ @ @ @ @ response , Mr Johnson said : `` This government is bringing forward legislation , not only a new Espionage Act , not only new laws to protect against theft of our intellectual property but also a Magnitsky Act directly to counter individuals in Russia or elsewhere who transgress human rights . ''
The PM claimed there was `` no country in the Western world that is more vigilant in protecting the interests of this country or the international community from Russian interference '' .
Mr Johnson said MPs should be `` in no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' .
`` This is about pressure from the Islingtonian Remainers who have seized on this report to try to give the impression that Russian interference was somehow responsible for Brexit , '' the PM claimed .
`` The people of this country did n't vote to leave the EU because of pressure from Russia or Russian interference , they voted because they wanted to take back control of our money , our trade policy and our laws . ''
In response to a question from Labour MP Ben Bradshaw , the PM @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have here is the rage and fury of the Remainer elite , finding that there is in fact nothing in this report and no smoking gun , '' he said .
Sir Keir accused Mr Johnson of reading `` pre-prepared answers '' rather than tackling concerns around national security .
He called for action against `` Kremlin-backed disinformation '' and highlighted the operations of the channel Russia Today in the UK .
The PM said the Labour leader should have called out his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn `` when he took money for appearing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` The leader of the opposition has more flip-flops than Bournemouth beach '' .
: : Listen to Polonium and the Piano Player on Apple Podcasts , Spotify , Spreaker or wherever good podcasts are listened to Mr Johnson 's father Stanley has previously appeared on the channel .
Responding to the PM 's flip-flops jibe , the Labour leader said : `` Pre-prepared gags on flip-flops - this is the former columnist who wrote two versions of every article ever published .
`` In case the prime minister had n't noticed , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and no frontbencher of this party has appeared on Russia Today since I 've been leading this party . ''

Boris Johnson has told MPs there was "no smoking gun" in the Russia report, as Sir Keir Starmer claimed the prime minister "sat on" the "extremely serious" document.
The Intelligence and Security Committee's report into the threat posed by Moscow to UK democracy dominated exchanges between the PM and Labour leader at the final PMQs before the summer recess.
Mr Johnson accused "Islingtonian Remainers" of seizing on the report to cast doubt over the vote for Brexit.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 3:29 Russia report: UK took 'eye off the ball'
Sir Keir told MPs the report demonstrated that Russia "poses an immediate and urgent threat to our national security" and is engaged in "espionage, interfering in democratic processes and serious crime".
Noting that the ISC first sent its report to the PM 10 months ago, the Labour leader asked: "Given that the threat is described as immediate and urgent why on earth did the prime minister sit on that report for so long?"
Mr Johnson hit back, saying when he was foreign secretary he took "the strongest possible action" against Russia over the 2018 Salisbury poisonings.
The PM claimed that Sir Keir "sat on his hands and said nothing while the Labour Party parroted the line of the Kremlin when people in this country were poisoned at the orders of Vladimir Putin".
The allegation was disputed by the Labour leader, who told the Commons he "stood up and condemned what happened in Salisbury".
"I supported the then-prime minister [Theresa May] on record, so I'd ask the prime minister to check the record."
Advertisement
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 3:33 New powers being prepared for British spies
The ISC's report said the government was slow to realise the danger posed by Russia to British democratic processes and did not properly consider whether Moscow could interfere in the 2016 EU referendum until after the vote.
Ministers "did not want to know" and "actively avoided looking for evidence", SNP MP and committee Stewart Hosie claimed.
The report described claims of Russia attempting to meddle in the 2014 Scottish independence vote as "credible" in "potentially the first post-Soviet Russian interference in a Western democratic process".
In the wake of its release, Downing Street has promised to give the security services extra powers to fight foreign interference, including introducing a "register of foreign agents".
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 0:43 Russia report 'much ado about nothing' - ambassador
Sir Keir said ministers knew about the need to give the security and intelligence agencies greater powers 18 months ago but did not act.
"The prime minister sat on this report for 10 months and failed to plug a gap in our laws on national security for a year-and-a-half," he said.
The Labour leader told the PM: "The government has taken its eye off the ball - arguably it wasn't even on the pitch."
In response, Mr Johnson said: "This government is bringing forward legislation, not only a new Espionage Act, not only new laws to protect against theft of our intellectual property but also a Magnitsky Act directly to counter individuals in Russia or elsewhere who transgress human rights."
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 2:10 UK 'actively avoided' probing Russia-EU referendum interference
The PM claimed there was "no country in the Western world that is more vigilant in protecting the interests of this country or the international community from Russian interference".
Mr Johnson said MPs should be "in no doubt what this is really all about".
"This is about pressure from the Islingtonian Remainers who have seized on this report to try to give the impression that Russian interference was somehow responsible for Brexit," the PM claimed.
"The people of this country didn't vote to leave the EU because of pressure from Russia or Russian interference, they voted because they wanted to take back control of our money, our trade policy and our laws."
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 1:26 'Londongrad' is 'laundromat' for Russian money
In response to a question from Labour MP Ben Bradshaw, the PM reiterated his argument.
"What you have here is the rage and fury of the Remainer elite, finding that there is in fact nothing in this report and no smoking gun," he said.
Sir Keir accused Mr Johnson of reading "pre-prepared answers" rather than tackling concerns around national security.
He called for action against "Kremlin-backed disinformation" and highlighted the operations of the channel Russia Today in the UK.
The PM said the Labour leader should have called out his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn "when he took money for appearing on Russia Today", adding: "The leader of the opposition has more flip-flops than Bournemouth beach".
Podcast Podcast , which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Podcast cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the This content is provided by, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enablecookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Podcast cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Podcast cookies for this session only. Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once
:: Listen to Polonium and the Piano Player on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker or wherever good podcasts are listened to
Mr Johnson's father Stanley has previously appeared on the channel.
Responding to the PM's flip-flops jibe, the Labour leader said: "Pre-prepared gags on flip-flops - this is the former columnist who wrote two versions of every article ever published.
"In case the prime minister hadn't noticed, the Labour Party is under new management and no frontbencher of this party has appeared on Russia Today since I've been leading this party."


skynewspolitics--2020-07-22--Minister 'regrets' sitting next to Tory donor at dinner before approving £1bn property deal

Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick has admitted he regrets sitting next to a Tory donor at a fundraising dinner before approving his application for a controversial planning development .
Mr Jenrick made the admission after weeks of pressure to reveal more about why he fast-tracked Richard Desmond 's £1bn development at the Westferry Printworks in east London - potentially saving the businessman up to £50m .
But he told on MPs on Wednesday that his actions had been `` perfectly fair '' .
The cabinet minister faced allegations of `` cash for favours '' after it emerged he had to quash @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conceding it was `` unlawful '' due to `` apparent bias '' .
Documents released earlier this month showed Mr Jenrick was `` insistent '' with officials that the plans be signed off speedily at the start of January .
And text exchanges between him and Mr Desmond were also released after they sat next to each other at the Conservative fundraiser , in the weeks before 2019 's general election .
Labour claimed the move to approve the application before Tower Hamlets Council 's community infrastructure levy ( CIL ) came into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Northern and Shell company up to £50m .
Mr Jenrick has insisted he had no interest in whether the finances of Mr Desmond , the former owner of the Daily Express and Channel 5 , benefitted from avoiding the additional fee .
`` I think it was a perfectly fair decision to try and get this done , one way or another , before the CIL charge came in , '' he told the Housing , Communities and Local Government Select Committee .
`` Who that benefits is of no interest to me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ personal finances of the applicant .
`` I 'm interested in making a fair decision on the basis of the facts before a material change in circumstances occurs . ''
He told MPs that the inspector 's report into the project had also found `` the viability of the project might be compromised were the CIL to come in '' .
Mr Jenrick admitted that elements of the initial decision to approve Westferry could have been dealt with better .
`` I think this could have been handled differently and I regret that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at a dinner in November , '' he said .
He added that `` with hindsight it would have been better not to have exchanged text messages with the applicant '' after the dinner .
: : Listen to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts , Google Podcasts , Spotify , Spreaker But Mr Jenrick insisted he had been `` acting entirely within both the actual rules and the spirit of the rules '' during the review process .
The former Treasury minister said officials in his department `` were aware of events @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with Mr Desmond and `` at no point did anybody advise me to recuse myself '' .
`` It is important to state once again that nothing the developer said to me had any bearing on my decision whatsoever , '' he added .
Boris Johnson has stuck by Mr Jenrick , with the prime minister 's spokesperson saying he has `` full confidence '' in him .

Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick has admitted he regrets sitting next to a Tory donor at a fundraising dinner before approving his application for a controversial planning development.
Mr Jenrick made the admission after weeks of pressure to reveal more about why he fast-tracked Richard Desmond's £1bn development at the Westferry Printworks in east London - potentially saving the businessman up to £50m.
But he told on MPs on Wednesday that his actions had been "perfectly fair".
Image: The Westferry Printworks development was approved by the housing secretary
The cabinet minister faced allegations of "cash for favours" after it emerged he had to quash his approval of the Westferry development, conceding it was "unlawful" due to "apparent bias".
Documents released earlier this month showed Mr Jenrick was "insistent" with officials that the plans be signed off speedily at the start of January.
And text exchanges between him and Mr Desmond were also released after they sat next to each other at the Conservative fundraiser, in the weeks before 2019's general election.
Labour claimed the move to approve the application before Tower Hamlets Council's community infrastructure levy (CIL) came into force would have saved Mr Desmond's Northern and Shell company up to £50m.
Image: Richard Desmond (R) attended a Tory fundraising dinner in November
Mr Jenrick has insisted he had no interest in whether the finances of Mr Desmond, the former owner of the Daily Express and Channel 5, benefitted from avoiding the additional fee.
"I think it was a perfectly fair decision to try and get this done, one way or another, before the CIL charge came in," he told the Housing, Communities and Local Government Select Committee.
Advertisement
"Who that benefits is of no interest to me. I'm not interested in the personal finances of the applicant.
"I'm interested in making a fair decision on the basis of the facts before a material change in circumstances occurs."
He told MPs that the inspector's report into the project had also found "the viability of the project might be compromised were the CIL to come in".
Mr Jenrick admitted that elements of the initial decision to approve Westferry could have been dealt with better.
"I think this could have been handled differently and I regret that I was sat next to the applicant at a dinner in November," he said.
He added that "with hindsight it would have been better not to have exchanged text messages with the applicant" after the dinner.
Podcast Podcast , which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Podcast cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the This content is provided by, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enablecookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Podcast cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Podcast cookies for this session only. Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once
:: Listen to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker
But Mr Jenrick insisted he had been "acting entirely within both the actual rules and the spirit of the rules" during the review process.
The former Treasury minister said officials in his department "were aware of events" surrounding the contact he had had with Mr Desmond and "at no point did anybody advise me to recuse myself".
"It is important to state once again that nothing the developer said to me had any bearing on my decision whatsoever," he added.
Boris Johnson has stuck by Mr Jenrick, with the prime minister's spokesperson saying he has "full confidence" in him.


skynewspolitics--2020-07-22--Corbyn could face legal action over Labour antisemitism apology

Jeremy Corbyn could be facing legal action after the ex-Labour leader claimed the party 's decision to pay a journalist damages risked `` giving credibility to misleading and inaccurate allegations '' .
The Labour Party on Wednesday apologised to a group of whistleblowers who contributed to a TV investigation into its handling of antisemitism claims under Mr Corbyn 's leadership .
Seven former employees from Labour 's governance and legal unit - who contributed to a BBC Panorama programme - had sued the party after it issued a press release describing them as having `` personal and political axes to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's broadcast in July 2019 .
As well as apologising to the whistleblowers at a brief High Court hearing , Labour said it would pay `` substantial damages '' and accepted press statements made against them last year were `` defamatory and false '' .
Labour also apologised and agreed to pay damages to the journalist who presented the Panorama investigation , John Ware , for falsely accusing him of `` deliberate and malicious misrepresentations designed to mislead the public '' .
However , opening up a major rift with his successor Sir @ @ @ @ @ @ @ party 's decision to apologise and make payments to the former staff as a `` political decision , not a legal one '' .
`` The decision to settle these claims in this way is disappointing , and risks giving credibility to misleading and inaccurate allegations about action taken to tackle antisemitism in the Labour Party in recent years , '' Mr Corbyn said in a statement .
He added that `` legal advice was that the party had a strong defence '' .
: : Listen to The World Tomorrow on Apple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Spreaker Mr Corbyn 's statement could open the door to a further round of legal action from Mr Ware and some of the whistleblowers .
Asked if action would be taken arising from Mr Corbyn 's statement after the hearing , lawyer Mark Lewis , from Patron Law , who represented the Panorama whistleblowers and Mr Ware , said : `` I can confirm that I have been instructed to pursue cases . ''
Len McCluskey , general secretary of the Unite union , also criticised the Labour Party 's action .
`` @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Labour Party funds to settle a case it was advised we would win in court , '' he said .
Mr McCluskey added an internal Labour report leaked earlier this year - which claimed anti-Jeremy Corbyn sentiment among Labour staff hindered efforts to tackle antisemitism - `` tells a very different story about what happened '' .
Speaking to Times Radio on Wednesday evening , Mr Ware said : `` There have been a couple of statements - one from Mr McCluskey , and the other from Jeremy Corbyn - which seem to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , actually , what the Labour Party said about the whistleblowers and about me was true but for the fact that Keir Starmer decided to make a political settlement .
`` In other words a settlement based on politics rather than the strength of our case .
`` I am advised that is defamatory , I am advised that I could continue with this ( legal action ) against Mr Corbyn personally .
`` I am thinking about that .
I do n't particularly wish to continue litigating against members of the Labour @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stake here .
`` I 'll think about that carefully . ''

Jeremy Corbyn could be facing legal action after the ex-Labour leader claimed the party's decision to pay a journalist damages risked "giving credibility to misleading and inaccurate allegations".
The Labour Party on Wednesday apologised to a group of whistleblowers who contributed to a TV investigation into its handling of antisemitism claims under Mr Corbyn's leadership.
Seven former employees from Labour's governance and legal unit - who contributed to a BBC Panorama programme - had sued the party after it issued a press release describing them as having "personal and political axes to grind".
It followed the programme's broadcast in July 2019.
Image: A major rift has opened up between Mr Corbyn and his successor Sir Keir Starmer
As well as apologising to the whistleblowers at a brief High Court hearing, Labour said it would pay "substantial damages" and accepted press statements made against them last year were "defamatory and false".
Labour also apologised and agreed to pay damages to the journalist who presented the Panorama investigation, John Ware, for falsely accusing him of "deliberate and malicious misrepresentations designed to mislead the public".
However, opening up a major rift with his successor Sir Keir Starmer, Mr Corbyn described the party's decision to apologise and make payments to the former staff as a "political decision, not a legal one".
"The decision to settle these claims in this way is disappointing, and risks giving credibility to misleading and inaccurate allegations about action taken to tackle antisemitism in the Labour Party in recent years," Mr Corbyn said in a statement.
He added that "legal advice was that the party had a strong defence".
Advertisement
Podcast Podcast , which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Podcast cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the This content is provided by, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enablecookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Podcast cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Podcast cookies for this session only. Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once
:: Listen to The World Tomorrow on Apple podcasts, Spotify, Google podcasts and Spreaker
Mr Corbyn's statement could open the door to a further round of legal action from Mr Ware and some of the whistleblowers.
Asked if action would be taken arising from Mr Corbyn's statement after the hearing, lawyer Mark Lewis, from Patron Law, who represented the Panorama whistleblowers and Mr Ware, said: "I can confirm that I have been instructed to pursue cases."
Len McCluskey, general secretary of the Unite union, also criticised the Labour Party's action.
"Today's settlement is a misuse of Labour Party funds to settle a case it was advised we would win in court," he said.
Mr McCluskey added an internal Labour report leaked earlier this year - which claimed anti-Jeremy Corbyn sentiment among Labour staff hindered efforts to tackle antisemitism - "tells a very different story about what happened".
Speaking to Times Radio on Wednesday evening, Mr Ware said: "There have been a couple of statements - one from Mr McCluskey, and the other from Jeremy Corbyn - which seem to me to come dangerously close to suggesting, actually, what the Labour Party said about the whistleblowers and about me was true but for the fact that Keir Starmer decided to make a political settlement.
"In other words a settlement based on politics rather than the strength of our case.
"I am advised that is defamatory, I am advised that I could continue with this (legal action) against Mr Corbyn personally.
"I am thinking about that. I don't particularly wish to continue litigating against members of the Labour Party but there's a principle at stake here.
"I'll think about that carefully."


skynewspolitics--2020-07-22--People in care homes to be reunited with families as visits to resume

People in care homes are set to be reunited with family members after the government said visits will once again be allowed .
Care home visits , which had been halted during the coronavirus crisis , will resume once local officials decide it is safe to do so .
The government published new guidance on Wednesday for how care homes can restart visits while also limiting the risk of further COVID-19 outbreaks .
However , care home bosses expressed their anger that the Department of Health and Social Care had taken so long to deliver the advice .
Risk assessments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reopened and , should visits then be allowed , visitors will be encouraged to wear face coverings as well as gloves and aprons , if necessary .
Care homes are also being urged to consider whether visits can take place in communal gardens or outdoor areas .
In order to limit the overall number of visitors and the risk of infection to a care home , the government said visits should be limited to a single constant visitor - such as a son , daughter or wife - per resident , wherever possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there had been 79 more deaths associated with COVID-19 across the UK .
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said : `` I know how painful it has been for those in care homes not being able to receive visits from their loved ones throughout this period .
`` We are now able to carefully and safely allow visits to care homes , which will be based on local knowledge and circumstances for each care home .
`` It is really important that we do n't undo all of the hard work of care homes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ families and friends can be safely reunited , so we have put in place guidance that protects everyone . ''
The Department of Health and Social Care said local directors of public health , along with local authorities , will lead the decision-making process on resuming care home visits in their local areas .
They will consider local rates of COVID-19 transmission and the needs of individual care home residents .
Care homes are being asked to keep a temporary record , including addresses and telephone numbers , of current and previous residents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the NHS test and trace scheme .
Those wishing to plan a visit are being asked to first speak to the relevant care home .
Care homes are being encouraged to set up a booking system for visitors and are urged not to permit ad hoc visits .
: : Listen to The World Tomorrow on Apple podcasts , Spotify , Google podcasts and Spreaker Professor Martin Green , chief executive of Care England , said : `` This guidance should have been with care providers last month .
`` We are at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Health and Social Care can not act quickly in a crisis or why it is deaf to the comments and input from the sector . ''
Lisa Lenton , chair of the Care Provider Alliance , said : `` The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has taken its toll in many ways .
`` The effect of not being able to see friends and family has been very difficult and very upsetting for many - both for the people who access care and support , and for their loved ones who have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Alliance welcomes this overdue guidance - the CPA has been calling for government guidance for many weeks and released its own visitors protocol last month in its absence .
`` People need people and this is such an important step for the wellbeing of individuals and their relatives . ''

People in care homes are set to be reunited with family members after the government said visits will once again be allowed.
Care home visits, which had been halted during the coronavirus crisis, will resume once local officials decide it is safe to do so.
The government published new guidance on Wednesday for how care homes can restart visits while also limiting the risk of further COVID-19 outbreaks.
Image: Health Secretary Matt Hancock acknowledged how painful it had been for residents not to have visitors
However, care home bosses expressed their anger that the Department of Health and Social Care had taken so long to deliver the advice.
Risk assessments will be done prior to homes being reopened and, should visits then be allowed, visitors will be encouraged to wear face coverings as well as gloves and aprons, if necessary.
Care homes are also being urged to consider whether visits can take place in communal gardens or outdoor areas.
In order to limit the overall number of visitors and the risk of infection to a care home, the government said visits should be limited to a single constant visitor - such as a son, daughter or wife - per resident, wherever possible.
It was announced on Wednesday that there had been 79 more deaths associated with COVID-19 across the UK.
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said: "I know how painful it has been for those in care homes not being able to receive visits from their loved ones throughout this period.
Advertisement
"We are now able to carefully and safely allow visits to care homes, which will be based on local knowledge and circumstances for each care home.
"It is really important that we don't undo all of the hard work of care homes over the last few months while ensuring families and friends can be safely reunited, so we have put in place guidance that protects everyone."
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 23:08 Coronavirus: Deciding Who Dies
The Department of Health and Social Care said local directors of public health, along with local authorities, will lead the decision-making process on resuming care home visits in their local areas.
They will consider local rates of COVID-19 transmission and the needs of individual care home residents.
Care homes are being asked to keep a temporary record, including addresses and telephone numbers, of current and previous residents, staff and visitors as part of the NHS test and trace scheme.
Those wishing to plan a visit are being asked to first speak to the relevant care home.
Care homes are being encouraged to set up a booking system for visitors and are urged not to permit ad hoc visits.
Podcast Podcast , which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Podcast cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the This content is provided by, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enablecookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Podcast cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Podcast cookies for this session only. Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once
:: Listen to The World Tomorrow on Apple podcasts, Spotify, Google podcasts and Spreaker
Professor Martin Green, chief executive of Care England, said: "This guidance should have been with care providers last month.
"We are at a loss to understand why the Department of Health and Social Care cannot act quickly in a crisis or why it is deaf to the comments and input from the sector."
Lisa Lenton, chair of the Care Provider Alliance, said: "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has taken its toll in many ways.
"The effect of not being able to see friends and family has been very difficult and very upsetting for many - both for the people who access care and support, and for their loved ones who have been isolated.
"The Care Provider Alliance welcomes this overdue guidance - the CPA has been calling for government guidance for many weeks and released its own visitors protocol last month in its absence.
"People need people and this is such an important step for the wellbeing of individuals and their relatives."


skynewspolitics--2020-07-23--UK must 'face possibility' of no deal on future relationship with EU

The UK must `` face the possibility '' that it will not agree a deal on its future relationship with the EU by the end of the year .
Chief negotiator David Frost said that with less than six months to go until the end of the Brexit transition period , the UK must `` continue preparing for all possible scenarios '' for once that deadline passes .
His EU counterpart , Michel Barnier , said an agreement `` at this point '' is `` unlikely '' .
The assessments came after the conclusion of the latest round of talks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a statement that `` considerable gaps remain in the most difficult areas '' - the so-called level playing field and fisheries .
`` We have always been clear that our principles in these areas are not simple negotiating positions but expressions of the reality that we will be a fully independent country at the end of the transition period , '' he said .
`` That is why we continue to look for a deal with , at its core , a free trade agreement similar to the one the EU already has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agreement based on existing precedents .
`` We remain unclear why this is so difficult for the EU , but we will continue to negotiate with this in mind . ''
But he said `` despite all the difficulties '' he still thought a deal could be reached in September .
: : Listen to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts , Google podcasts , Spotify , Spreaker '' We will keep working hard to bridge the gaps and find a way through , '' Mr Frost added .
EU negotiator Michel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a number of issues mean a deal at this point is `` unlikely '' .
He highlighted in particular London 's demands on fisheries , telling a news conference : `` The UK is effectively seeking for near-total exclusion of fishing vessels from the UK 's water .
That is simply unacceptable . ''
Mr Barnier accused the UK of not displaying a `` willingness to break the deadlock '' and claimed it has `` not shown the same level of engagement and readiness to find solutions respecting the EU fundamental principles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` time for answers is quickly running out '' , adding : `` If we do not reach an agreement on our future partnership there will be more friction . ''
Britain left the EU at the end of January after 47 years of membership and is currently in an 11-month transition period , which sees it continue to follow the bloc 's rules and regulations .
This time frame is being used to negotiate a free trade agreement and sort out the terms of the future relationship that will govern ties between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future .
Prime Minister Boris Johnson has formally told the EU that he will not extend the transition period beyond the end of this year , despite warnings that disruption caused by the coronavirus pandemic has made striking a deal impossible .
If the transition ends without a deal being struck , the UK will likely have to trade with the EU on World Trade Organisation terms from next year .
Mr Barnier said the two sides had until October `` at the latest '' to come to a deal or risk the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If we want to avoid this additional friction we must come to an agreement in October at the latest so that our new treaty can enter into force on 1 January next year , '' he said .
`` This means that we only a few weeks left and that we should not waste it . ''

The UK must "face the possibility" that it will not agree a deal on its future relationship with the EU by the end of the year.
Chief negotiator David Frost said that with less than six months to go until the end of the Brexit transition period, the UK must "continue preparing for all possible scenarios" for once that deadline passes.
His EU counterpart, Michel Barnier, said an agreement "at this point" is "unlikely".
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 3:50 Brexit: Fishing for a deal
The assessments came after the conclusion of the latest round of talks in London.
Mr Frost said in a statement that "considerable gaps remain in the most difficult areas" - the so-called level playing field and fisheries.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 2:00 Barnier believes Brexit trade deal 'unlikely'
"We have always been clear that our principles in these areas are not simple negotiating positions but expressions of the reality that we will be a fully independent country at the end of the transition period," he said.
"That is why we continue to look for a deal with, at its core, a free trade agreement similar to the one the EU already has with Canada - that is, an agreement based on existing precedents.
"We remain unclear why this is so difficult for the EU, but we will continue to negotiate with this in mind."
But he said "despite all the difficulties" he still thought a deal could be reached in September.
Advertisement
Podcast Podcast , which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Podcast cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the This content is provided by, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enablecookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Podcast cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Podcast cookies for this session only. Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once
:: Listen to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts, Google podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker
"We will keep working hard to bridge the gaps and find a way through," Mr Frost added.
EU negotiator Michel Barnier said the UK's current stances on a number of issues mean a deal at this point is "unlikely".
He highlighted in particular London's demands on fisheries, telling a news conference: "The UK is effectively seeking for near-total exclusion of fishing vessels from the UK's water. That is simply unacceptable."
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 0:52 'The faster, the better' on Brexit deal - PM
Mr Barnier accused the UK of not displaying a "willingness to break the deadlock" and claimed it has "not shown the same level of engagement and readiness to find solutions respecting the EU fundamental principles and interests".
He said the "time for answers is quickly running out", adding: "If we do not reach an agreement on our future partnership there will be more friction."
Britain left the EU at the end of January after 47 years of membership and is currently in an 11-month transition period, which sees it continue to follow the bloc's rules and regulations.
This time frame is being used to negotiate a free trade agreement and sort out the terms of the future relationship that will govern ties between the UK and the EU in the future.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 0:32 'We're leaving': Brexit transition to end on 31 December
Prime Minister Boris Johnson has formally told the EU that he will not extend the transition period beyond the end of this year, despite warnings that disruption caused by the coronavirus pandemic has made striking a deal impossible.
If the transition ends without a deal being struck, the UK will likely have to trade with the EU on World Trade Organisation terms from next year.
Mr Barnier said the two sides had until October "at the latest" to come to a deal or risk the imposition of quotas and tariffs.
"If we want to avoid this additional friction we must come to an agreement in October at the latest so that our new treaty can enter into force on 1 January next year," he said.
"This means that we only a few weeks left and that we should not waste it."
Analysis: Rhetoric aside, progress is being made
By Adam Parsons, Europe correspondent
Michel Barnier and David Frost are serious negotiators, ever-keen to downplay progress until a deal is actually done. No surprise, then, that they both sounded gloomy today.
But actually, there are reasons to think that, away from the rhetoric, progress is being made. Once we had four or five sticking points - now there seem to be just two.
They are the so-called "level playing field" and fishing.
The first revolves around state aid and competition rules, which Westminster thinks is a sovereign right for a nation that has left the EU but Brussels thinks could be used to give British companies an unfair advantage.
This remains a fundamental clash, and is probably the most difficult sticking point.
Image: David Frost and Michel Barnier both sounded gloomy today, our correspondent notes
The second is about access to British coastal waters. Symbolically, this is important but economically it isn't - the British fishing industry has a turnover that is less than Harrod's department store.
Faced against that is more than two-thirds of EU members aren't affected by rules on fishing in British waters, and, as one diplomat said to me, they "profoundly don't care".
But before we assume that the fishing nations will eventually have to accept a massive cut in access in order to get the deal passed by the end of the year, a note of caution: Any agreement will have to be ratified by every EU member. If the Danes, for instance, feel their fishing industry has been hobbled, they could stymie the whole thing.
The tectonic plates are moving, though. It sounds like progress has been made on the question of governance, particularly how to resolve future disputes.
Britain has always bridled at the thought of being controlled by the European Court of Justice and now the EU seems to have taken that on board.


skynewspolitics--2020-07-23--When do I have to wear a mask? Rules changing in England tomorrow

Face coverings will be compulsory in shops in England from Friday to stop the spread of coronavirus .
But they are still not mandatory in cafes , pubs and restaurants , which has led to confusion over where the new rule applies in relation to buying food .
Does a takeaway , for example , count as a shop or a restaurant ?
And what about fast food outlets that offer both dine-in and takeaway service ?
The government has been accused of sending mixed messages with conflicting advice and examples from ministers - for example Michael Gove deciding not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the chancellor doing so .
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said on Thursday there had been `` some confusion '' and `` greater clarity '' is needed .
But he added : `` I think it 's very important as leader of the opposition that I say clearly we must follow the government 's advice .
`` It 's very important that where the advice is to wear the mask we should all do it . ''
Speaking on Sky News ' Kay Burley @ Breakfast show , Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sandwich shops if taking away .
`` If you are going into Pret a Manger , and you are eating in Pret a Manger , which in some of their stores you can , then obviously you would n't be wearing a face mask because you 're eating .
`` But it 's clear , good common sense that if you are going in to buy a takeaway and you 're leaving again , you 're treating it like a shop and you should be wearing a face mask '' , he said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coffee shops with indoor seating will be classed as shops , not restaurants .
Therefore , masks will be mandatory within them from tomorrow .
Buying food from a counter and then sitting down to eat inside will be banned , according to the Daily Telegraph .
: : Listen to The World Tomorrow on Apple podcasts , Spotify , Google podcasts and Spreaker The newspaper also reports that premises with table service will be exempt from the new rules but customers who dine-in must sit down straight away .
It means that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be differing rules depending on your reason for visiting .
In McDonald 's , for example , anyone who sits down to eat will not have to wear a mask .
But anyone who orders takeaway from the counter will .
Those who fail to wear a mask could be fined up to £100 - brought down to £50 if paid within fortnight .
Children under 11 and those with disabilities are exempt .
But it remains unclear how strictly the new law will be enforced .
Supermarket chain Sainsbury 's has already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enter their stores without a mask .
Head of the Metropolitan Police Cressida Dick has said officers should only be called for someone failing to wear a face covering as `` a last resort '' .
And police and crime commissioners for Thames Valley , Devon and Cornwall have said their officers will not attend incidents where shoppers refuse to wear masks , unless they turn violent .
Wearing face coverings in shops is already mandatory in Scotland .

Wearing a face covering will be mandatory in shops and other public spaces across England from Friday to stop the spread of coronavirus.
People will also have to wear a mask, scarf or bandana that covers the nose and mouth in shopping centres and indoor transport hubs, like bus and train stations.
When it comes to buying food, the law will depend on where you're eating it.
Image: People who flout the law face a £100 fine
Face coverings will not be mandatory in pubs and restaurants.
But they will be to order food from a cafe. If you are eating in, you will be allowed to remove the covering in the area dedicated to eat or drink what you've purchased.
The government has been accused of sending mixed messages in recent days with conflicting advice and examples from ministers - for example Michael Gove deciding not to wear a mask in Pret but the chancellor doing so.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said on Thursday there had been "some confusion" and "greater clarity" is needed.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 3:09 Sky correspondent Thomas Moore looks at the science behind face masks.
But he added: "I think it's very important as leader of the opposition that I say clearly we must follow the government's advice.
"It's very important that where the advice is to wear the mask we should all do it."
Advertisement
Speaking on Sky News' Kay Burley@Breakfast show, Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis confirmed masks must be worn when visiting sandwich shops if taking away.
"If you are going into Pret a Manger, and you are eating in Pret a Manger, which in some of their stores you can, then obviously you wouldn't be wearing a face mask because you're eating.
"But it's clear, good common sense that if you are going in to buy a takeaway and you're leaving again, you're treating it like a shop and you should be wearing a face mask", he said.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 0:48 Cabinet minister tells people to use 'good common sense'
Announcing the latest guidance, the Department of Health and Social care said: "There is evidence to suggest that, when used correctly, face coverings may reduce the likelihood of someone with the infection passing it on to others, particularly if they are asymptomatic."
Those who fail to follow the new law could be fined up to £100 - brought down to £50 if paid within fortnight.
Children under 11 and those with disabilities are exempt, and people can remove face coverings for valid reasons like being asked to do so in a bank or to prove their identity if buying age-restricted products.
Podcast Podcast , which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Podcast cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the This content is provided by, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enablecookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Podcast cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Podcast cookies for this session only. Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once
:: Listen to The World Tomorrow on Apple podcasts, Spotify, Google podcasts and Spreaker
Places where face coverings will remain discretionary include:
Hairdressers and close contact services
Eat-in restaurants, cafes and pubs. Face coverings will be required in cafes or take-away restaurants that do not provide table service, other than in designated seating areas.
Entertainment venues, including cinemas, concert halls and theatres
Visitor attractions (such as heritage sites or museums)
Gyms and leisure centres
Image: Children under 11 and those with disabilities are exempt from the new law
But it remains unclear how strictly the new law will be enforced.
Supermarket chain Sainsbury's has already said they will not challenge customers who enter their stores without a mask.
Head of the Metropolitan Police Cressida Dick has said officers should only be called for someone failing to wear a face covering as "a last resort".
And police and crime commissioners for Thames Valley, Devon and Cornwall have said their officers will not attend incidents where shoppers refuse to wear masks, unless they turn violent.
Wearing face coverings in shops is already mandatory in Scotland.


skynewspolitics--2020-07-23--'Exciting project': Minister talks up Scotland-Northern Ireland bridge

A minister has talked up the idea of a bridge between Scotland and Northern Ireland , describing it as an `` exciting project '' .
Brandon Lewis told Sky News it was `` absolutely right '' that the government is looking into its feasibility .
Speaking to Kay Burley @ Breakfast , the Northern Ireland secretary said : `` Big infrastructure projects throughout history have sometimes been controversial , difficult , but they 've been the right thing to do .
`` The M25 was n't a straightforward thing , but nobody could imagine life around London without it now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right thing to do and it could be fantastic for connectivity . ''
Downing Street confirmed in February that work was under way to flesh out the proposal .
`` The prime minister is ambitious in terms of infrastructure projects around the UK to boost connectivity , '' his spokesman told reporters at the time .
`` There is a proper piece of work being carried out into the idea .
`` It is being done by a range of government officials ; as with all work we ask for and it reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Johnson , who first touted the idea back in 2018 when he was foreign secretary , has said it would cost `` about £15bn '' .
But critics of the idea have said it would be a waste of money .
They say it is the latest example of the PM 's penchant for `` vanity projects '' , which have included pushing for an airport in the Thames Estuary and the failed Garden Bridge in London .
SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford told Sky News the GB-NI bridge was `` bluff and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the day , I think this is a bridge too far for Boris Johnson , '' he told Kay Burley @ Breakfast .
: : Listen to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts , Google podcasts , Spotify , Spreaker It comes as Mr Johnson visits Scotland for the first time since his general election victory in December .
He is expected to claim that the `` sheer might of our union '' has strengthened the fight against coronavirus north of the border .
But the trip comes as opinion polls @ @ @ @ @ @ @ independence , with backing for leaving the union now at 54 % .

A minister has talked up the idea of a bridge between Scotland and Northern Ireland, describing it as an "exciting project".
Brandon Lewis told Sky News it was "absolutely right" that the government is looking into its feasibility.
Speaking to Kay Burley @ Breakfast, the Northern Ireland secretary said: "Big infrastructure projects throughout history have sometimes been controversial, difficult, but they've been the right thing to do.
Image: Boris Johnson has said the bridge would cost 'about £15bn'
"The M25 wasn't a straightforward thing, but nobody could imagine life around London without it now.
"I think it is the right thing to do and it could be fantastic for connectivity."
Downing Street confirmed in February that work was under way to flesh out the proposal.
"The prime minister is ambitious in terms of infrastructure projects around the UK to boost connectivity," his spokesman told reporters at the time.
"There is a proper piece of work being carried out into the idea.
"It is being done by a range of government officials; as with all work we ask for and it reports in to Number 10."
Advertisement
Image: Brandon Lewis said the government was right to look into the idea
Mr Johnson, who first touted the idea back in 2018 when he was foreign secretary, has said it would cost "about £15bn".
But critics of the idea have said it would be a waste of money.
They say it is the latest example of the PM's penchant for "vanity projects", which have included pushing for an airport in the Thames Estuary and the failed Garden Bridge in London.
SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford told Sky News the GB-NI bridge was "bluff and bluster".
"At the end of the day, I think this is a bridge too far for Boris Johnson," he told Kay Burley @ Breakfast.
Podcast Podcast , which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Podcast cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the This content is provided by, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enablecookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Podcast cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Podcast cookies for this session only. Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once
:: Listen to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts, Google podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker
It comes as Mr Johnson visits Scotland for the first time since his general election victory in December.
He is expected to claim that the "sheer might of our union" has strengthened the fight against coronavirus north of the border.
But the trip comes as opinion polls suggest a surge in support for Scottish independence, with backing for leaving the union now at 54%.