vdare--2020-01-01--Ann Coulter: Hollywood Is Not Sending Its Best

Earlier , by Ann Coulter : Who 's Doing The Raping ?
Immigrants—But Do n't Ask 'LAW & ORDER SVU ' !
America ’ s apparently unstoppable gusher of mass Third World immigration is on track to deliver a sick , dystopian future , where some people will do very well—cheap maids and all—but women and children will fare quite poorly .
With the major media actively covering up the crimes of immigrants , and big tech companies censoring people who point out the peculiarities of other cultures , there seems to be a major campaign on to prevent Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Law & Order ” to tell us the truth—technically to prompt me to tell the truth by correcting their scripts , in which sex traffickers , little boy rapists and women-hating mass shooters are invariably Trump-supporting white American males .
Beautiful actors and actresses spout dialogue written for them by “ queer Jewish feminists ” —according to one writer ’ s self-description in response to my recent “ Law & Order : SVU ” column .
I had pointed out that sex traffickers of 9-year-old illegal alien girls—while prevalent in our new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ever been what the show advertised : married white American businessmen .
I can ’ t help but notice that they don ’ t let viewers get a gander at Celine .
No , they use hot actors and actresses—pretty much the molecular opposite of a “ queer , Jewish feminist ” —to express the multiple hatreds of a “ queer , Jewish feminist ” to the TV viewing public .
You can view Celine ’ s photo here : twitter.com/tvceline/status/730154799010873344 .
It 's always Opposites Day at “ Law & Order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will review another totally believable episode , from Season 20 , titled “ Man Up/Man Down.
” In this show , a blond , blue-eyed married American man anally rapes his teenaged sons when he takes them ... hunting .
Yes , hunting .
The only thing missing was the MAGA hat .
Checking my research on child rape in America , I see this has happened NEVER .
To the contrary , American men who look a lot like `` Law & Order ’ s '' idea of a pedophile came home @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of our dear Afghan “ allies.
” I don ’ t know what we ’ re supposed to be doing in Afghanistan at this point , but apparently stopping child rape was never on the agenda .
Our own troops were ordered not to interrupt the Afghanis ' boy-rape bacchanals .
Even the left-wing ( but not “ Law & Order : SVU ” -level dimwitted ) Guardian ( in the U.K. ) has written about the gusto for boy-rape in the Arab world : Numerous documentaries have covered Afghanistan ’ s practice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ boy play.
” This includes such “ fuming racist all-capsing ” productions as Vice Media ’ s “ This Is What Winning Looks Like ” and Najibullah Quraishi ’ s “ The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan.
” In the Vice Media documentary , after a young boy is shot trying to escape his indigenous sodomizer , a U.S. Marine demands that the barracks be searched and any Afghan policemen hiding children be tried and jailed .
The Afghan police chief replies : `` [ The boys ] like being there and giving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demands of the U.S. Marine : `` If [ my commanders ] do n't f*ck the asses of those boys , what should they f*ck ?
The p*ssies of their own grandmothers ?
” Thank heaven we have `` Law & Order : SVU '' to expose NRA members !
In the brain of a “ queer , Jewish feminist , ” the thought process is : I personally don ’ t enjoy this perfectly traditional , masculine , Anglo-Saxon sport of hunting ; therefore , I will portray American male hunters as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ masculinity ” today : Dads don ’ t show up to their sons ' soccer practice in time because they ’ re too busy working 60 hours a week to put a roof over their families ' heads .
“ Toxic masculinity ” tomorrow : Dads demand the right to anally rape little boys—else they “ f*ck ?
the p*ssies of their own grandmothers . ''
Ann Coulter is the author of THIRTEEN New York Times bestsellers—collect them here .
Her book , ¡Adios America !
The Left ’ s Plan To Turn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hole , was released on June 1 , 2015 .
Her latest book , Resistance Is Futile !
: How the Trump-Hating Left Lost Its Collective Mind , was released on August 21 , 2018 .

Earlier, by Ann Coulter: Who's Doing The Raping? Immigrants—But Don't Ask 'LAW & ORDER SVU'!
America’s apparently unstoppable gusher of mass Third World immigration is on track to deliver a sick, dystopian future, where some people will do very well—cheap maids and all—but women and children will fare quite poorly.
(Finally! A story where women and children really ARE “hardest hit.”) (That’s Joe Sobran’s gag on a typical New York Times headline.)
With the major media actively covering up the crimes of immigrants, and big tech companies censoring people who point out the peculiarities of other cultures, there seems to be a major campaign on to prevent Americans from noticing.
Luckily, we have “Law & Order” to tell us the truth—technically to prompt me to tell the truth by correcting their scripts, in which sex traffickers, little boy rapists and women-hating mass shooters are invariably Trump-supporting white American males.
Beautiful actors and actresses spout dialogue written for them by “queer Jewish feminists”—according to one writer’s self-description in response to my recent “Law & Order: SVU” column.
I had pointed out that sex traffickers of 9-year-old illegal alien girls—while prevalent in our new “diverse” country—have never, ever, ever been what the show advertised: married white American businessmen.
Celine Robinson responded on Twitter:
“I could not be more proud that ann coulter hates an episode of TV that I wrote. Nothing makes my heart sing like a fuming racist all-capsing about the progressive messaging she cannot stop due to her eternal and total irrelevance. "Yours, "A half French, queer, Jewish feminist”
I can’t help but notice that they don’t let viewers get a gander at Celine. No, they use hot actors and actresses—pretty much the molecular opposite of a “queer, Jewish feminist”—to express the multiple hatreds of a “queer, Jewish feminist” to the TV viewing public.
You can view Celine’s photo here: twitter.com/tvceline/status/730154799010873344. It's always Opposites Day at “Law & Order: SVU”!
Today, I will review another totally believable episode, from Season 20, titled “Man Up/Man Down.” In this show, a blond, blue-eyed married American man anally rapes his teenaged sons when he takes them ... hunting. Yes, hunting. The only thing missing was the MAGA hat.
Checking my research on child rape in America, I see this has happened NEVER.
To the contrary, American men who look a lot like "Law & Order’s" idea of a pedophile came home from Afghanistan sickened by the boy-rape frenzies of our dear Afghan “allies.”
I don’t know what we’re supposed to be doing in Afghanistan at this point, but apparently stopping child rape was never on the agenda. Our own troops were ordered not to interrupt the Afghanis' boy-rape bacchanals.
Even the left-wing (but not “Law & Order: SVU”-level dimwitted) Guardian (in the U.K.) has written about the gusto for boy-rape in the Arab world:
“[M]en who sodomise young boys are not considered homosexuals or paedophiles. The love of young boys is not a phenomenon restricted to Afghanistan; homosexual pederasty is common in neighbouring Pakistan, too.”
Numerous documentaries have covered Afghanistan’s practice of “bacha bazi," or “boy play.” This includes such “fuming racist all-capsing” productions as Vice Media’s “This Is What Winning Looks Like” and Najibullah Quraishi’s “The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan.”
In the Vice Media documentary, after a young boy is shot trying to escape his indigenous sodomizer, a U.S. Marine demands that the barracks be searched and any Afghan policemen hiding children be tried and jailed.
The Afghan police chief replies: "[The boys] like being there and giving their asses at night." He demands of the U.S. Marine: "If [my commanders] don't f*ck the asses of those boys, what should they f*ck? The p*ssies of their own grandmothers?”
Thank heaven we have "Law & Order: SVU" to expose NRA members!
In the brain of a “queer, Jewish feminist,” the thought process is: I personally don’t enjoy this perfectly traditional, masculine, Anglo-Saxon sport of hunting; therefore, I will portray American male hunters as butt-raping their own sons.
“Toxic masculinity” today: Dads don’t show up to their sons' soccer practice in time because they’re too busy working 60 hours a week to put a roof over their families' heads.
“Toxic masculinity” tomorrow: Dads demand the right to anally rape little boys—else they “f*ck? the p*ssies of their own grandmothers."
COPYRIGHT 2019 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION
Ann Coulter is the author of THIRTEEN New York Times bestsellers—collect them here.
Her book, ¡Adios America! The Left’s Plan To Turn Our Country Into A Third World Hell Hole, was released on June 1, 2015.
Her latest book, Resistance Is Futile!: How the Trump-Hating Left Lost Its Collective Mind, was released on August 21, 2018.


vdare--2020-01-01--Starting In 2020 Public Schools Across California Will No Longer Suspend Students For Disobeying Tea

Starting In 2020 Public Schools Across California Will No Longer Suspend Students For Disobeying Teachers, Because Too Many Students Of Color (Non-Whites) Get Suspended

First data point you need to know : white students represent just 23 percent of public school enrollment in the state of California .
Second data point you need to know : though black students make up just 5 percent of the public school enrollment in the state of California , they represent the majority of students suspended ( even though the state banned suspensions based on “ defiance and disruption ” in 2014… to try and stop too many non-white students from being suspended ) .
Unfortunately , too many students of color are being suspended still in California @ @ @ @ @ @ @ governing proper behavior in public schools , so the concept of suspensions is being retired .
California public schools can ’ t suspend students for disobeying teachers , new law says , KRON4.com , December 26 , 2019 SACRAMENTO ( KRON ) — New laws taking effect in 2020 will impact schools across California .
Starting next school year , it will be illegal for public schools in the state to suspend students in first through fifth grade for willfully defying teachers or administrators .
Then , from 2021 through 2025 , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grades six through eight .
Supporters say suspensions for willful defiance are disproportionately used against students of color .
Another new law — a mandatory change to school start times .
The law is set to be phased in over the next three years .
High schools can start no earlier than 8:30 a.m. , and no sooner than 8 a.m. for middle schoolers .
The controversial measure could be costly , state legislative analysts have said some schools may end up spending millions to accommodate the adjustment .
Limiting and banning smartphone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law affecting schools in 2020 .
School boards will have the power to ban devices with the exception of emergencies or other special situations , such as medical reasons .
Supporters say smart phone use is linked to lower student performance and interferes with the educational mission of schools .
The great Robert Heinlein once wrote , “ punishment must be unusual or it serves no purpose.
” As we see in California , the concepts of morality , civility and duty are being abandoned , because those displaying anti-social behavior in public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ students make up just 23 percent of public-school enrollment in the state .
Remember the old saying ?
As California goes , so goes the nation… Repeat after me , “ our new country is going to be great !
”

First data point you need to know: white students represent just 23 percent of public school enrollment in the state of California.
Second data point you need to know: though black students make up just 5 percent of the public school enrollment in the state of California, they represent the majority of students suspended (even though the state banned suspensions based on “defiance and disruption” in 2014… to try and stop too many non-white students from being suspended).
Unfortunately, too many students of color are being suspended still in California for failing to abide by the rules governing proper behavior in public schools, so the concept of suspensions is being retired.
Permanently.
California public schools can’t suspend students for disobeying teachers, new law says, KRON4.com, December 26, 2019 SACRAMENTO (KRON) — New laws taking effect in 2020 will impact schools across California. Starting next school year, it will be illegal for public schools in the state to suspend students in first through fifth grade for willfully defying teachers or administrators. Then, from 2021 through 2025, it will be temporarily extended to kids in grades six through eight. Supporters say suspensions for willful defiance are disproportionately used against students of color. Another new law — a mandatory change to school start times. The law is set to be phased in over the next three years. High schools can start no earlier than 8:30 a.m., and no sooner than 8 a.m. for middle schoolers. The controversial measure could be costly, state legislative analysts have said some schools may end up spending millions to accommodate the adjustment. Limiting and banning smartphone use is at the center of another law affecting schools in 2020. School boards will have the power to ban devices with the exception of emergencies or other special situations, such as medical reasons. Supporters say smart phone use is linked to lower student performance and interferes with the educational mission of schools.
The great Robert Heinlein once wrote, “punishment must be unusual or it serves no purpose.”
As we see in California, the concepts of morality, civility and duty are being abandoned, because those displaying anti-social behavior in public schools are predominately non-white… even though white students make up just 23 percent of public-school enrollment in the state.
Remember the old saying? As California goes, so goes the nation…
Repeat after me, “our new country is going to be great!”
[Comment at Unz.com]


vdare--2020-01-07--Demographically-Empowered Dems In VA Push For "Fair And Equitable Criminal Justice System"... Becaus

Demographically-Empowered Dems In VA Push For "Fair And Equitable Criminal Justice System"... Because Too Many Blacks Are In Jail

Previously by Paul Kersey : Non-White Democrats in Virginia Seek to Outlaw White Flight and Creation of White Suburbs and In Face of Democrat Party Tyranny , 90 % of Virginia Counties Become 2nd Amendment/Gun ‘ Sanctuaries ' ; These Counties Are Overwhelmingly White !
To the victor , goes the spoils .
Courtesy of demographic change ( mass non-white legal immigration/refugee resettlement ) and the monolithic black vote , Democrats are poised to take control of the every level of the Virginia state government .
There is no time for pragmatic change once the white majority/conservatives have been dispossessed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Left , it is time to completely embarrass your vanquished opponent .
And now , Democrats , fresh off their electoral victory in November of 2019 ( all courtesy of demographic change and the usurpation of white conservatives ) feel emboldened to celebrate and spike the proverbial football with impunity .
Gov .
Ralph Northam said Friday that he would throw his weight behind the decriminalization of marijuana in Virginia this year but said he wants to study full legalization before going further .
Northam announced legislation Friday that would make possession of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carrying a $ 50 penalty , instead of a criminal misdemeanor .
The proposal is part of a broader “ criminal justice reform agenda ” that includes changes to the state ’ s parole system , a higher threshold for theft to be considered a felony , and an increase to the age at which a young offender can be tried as an adult from 14 to 16 .
Seeking to further a key 2019 win by his administration , Northam proposes to permanently eliminate the automatic suspension of driver ’ s licenses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ costs .
Lawmakers had backed the reinstatement of licenses for 627,000 Virginians last year ; Northam is proposing to end the practice permanently .
“ All Virginians deserve access to a fair and equitable criminal justice system , ” Northam said Friday during an event at OAR Richmond , a nonprofit that helps rehabilitate people formerly incarcerated .
“ This is a bold step towards a more just and inclusive commonwealth.
” Easing the legal consequences for marijuana possession has for years been a goal of Democrats , who have been blocked by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Northam and other Democrats have argued that enforcement is expensive as possession of the drug becomes widespread .
They also say it disproportionately jails African Americans .
The measure might see some GOP support .
Sen. Siobhan Dunnavant , R-Henrico , supports decriminalization and has expressed support for the use of medical cannabis .
Northam is proposing to do away with criminal prosecution for people arrested with up to a half-ounce of marijuana or about 14 grams .
An average joint contains a third to a half of a gram , according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now , possession of that amount could result in a $ 500 fine and 30 days in jail .
A second arrest could result in a $ 2,500 fine , driver ’ s license suspension and up to a year in jail .
Northam is also backing legislation that would expunge the records of individuals who have been convicted for possessing up to a half-ounce of marijuana .
He also wants to end the suspension of driver ’ s licenses for drug crimes , and for driving off without paying for gas at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ measures are passed , Virginia would join 26 other states that have passed decriminalization measures or eliminated the possibility of jail time for possession of small amounts , according to the National Conference of State Legislatures .
Of those 26 , 11 have fully legalized possession of small amounts of marijuana .
On Friday , Northam stopped short of supporting legalization .
During a gaggle with reporters , Northam pointed to his career as a pediatrician and said he has concerns about encouraging drug use among young people .
Northam added that he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grappling with and implementing legalization , and that he is backing legislation that would call for a formal review of the issue .
He said that if a piece of legislation to legalize marijuana arrived at his desk for signature , he would consider it .
Advocates may find a supporter in Attorney General Mark Herring , who wrote in a recent opinion column that Virginia should “ start moving toward legal and regulated adult use.
” No bills have been filed to fully legalize the drug for recreational use .
Bill Farrar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the state should go further , and “ move past incremental discussions about decriminalization.
” “ Leaving a civil fine in place will continue to allow police to use a purported odor to disproportionately stop people of color for searches or to charge them with other crimes , ” he said in a statement .
“ There is no reason to wait any longer to simply strike simple possession from the criminal code.
” Northam on Friday also said he will support legislation to make it more difficult for theft to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , lawmakers raised the threshold from $ 200 to $ 500 , the first time it had been raised since 1980 .
Northam is proposing to double it to $ 1,000 .
It ’ s a strategy states are moving toward as criminal justice reform advocates note that thresholds set in the 1980s and before have not been adjusted for inflation .
Felony convictions , they argue , can hinder offenders from obtaining work , and accessing public housing and welfare .
A 2017 study from The Pew Charitable Trusts found that raising @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in property crime and theft rates in the 30 states that made the change between 2000 and 2012 .
Northam ’ s criminal reform package also includes bills that would expand the number of people potentially eligible for parole .
Virginia abolished parole in 1995 , but people sentenced before that are still eligible .
Northam said he would support legislation that would allow people sentenced by jury between 1995 and 2000 to also be eligible , given a court ruling that found jurors were not told parole had been abolished .
Northam @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who are permanently disabled to be eligible for parole .
Farrar , of the ACLU , said the governor ’ s package “ touches upon many important aspects of badly needed ” reforms , but “ falls far short of what is needed.
” Farrar praised the move to permanently end the license suspensions , but said an increase in the theft felony threshold up to $ 1,500 would be more appropriate .
He also said he questioned how the terminally ill and disabled might be cared for if released on parole .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ all , democracy is a racial headcount .
As you run out of white conservatives , those who outvote you have no interest in preserving your past ( remove all Confederate statues ) or ensuring you have a future .

Previously by Paul Kersey: Non-White Democrats in Virginia Seek to Outlaw White Flight and Creation of White Suburbs and In Face of Democrat Party Tyranny, 90% of Virginia Counties Become 2nd Amendment/Gun ‘Sanctuaries'; These Counties Are Overwhelmingly White!
To the victor, goes the spoils.
Courtesy of demographic change (mass non-white legal immigration/refugee resettlement) and the monolithic black vote, Democrats are poised to take control of the every level of the Virginia state government. There is no time for pragmatic change once the white majority/conservatives have been dispossessed, for in the eyes of the Left, it is time to completely embarrass your vanquished opponent.
And now, Democrats, fresh off their electoral victory in November of 2019 (all courtesy of demographic change and the usurpation of white conservatives) feel emboldened to celebrate and spike the proverbial football with impunity.
Northam backs marijuana decriminalization, raising felony larceny threshold to $1,000, Richmond.com, January 4, 2019
Gov. Ralph Northam said Friday that he would throw his weight behind the decriminalization of marijuana in Virginia this year but said he wants to study full legalization before going further.
Northam announced legislation Friday that would make possession of small amounts of marijuana a civil offense carrying a $50 penalty, instead of a criminal misdemeanor.
The proposal is part of a broader “criminal justice reform agenda” that includes changes to the state’s parole system, a higher threshold for theft to be considered a felony, and an increase to the age at which a young offender can be tried as an adult from 14 to 16.
Seeking to further a key 2019 win by his administration, Northam proposes to permanently eliminate the automatic suspension of driver’s licenses for unpaid fines, fees and court costs. Lawmakers had backed the reinstatement of licenses for 627,000 Virginians last year; Northam is proposing to end the practice permanently.
“All Virginians deserve access to a fair and equitable criminal justice system,” Northam said Friday during an event at OAR Richmond, a nonprofit that helps rehabilitate people formerly incarcerated. “This is a bold step towards a more just and inclusive commonwealth.”
Easing the legal consequences for marijuana possession has for years been a goal of Democrats, who have been blocked by some Republicans in a formerly GOP-controlled legislature.
Northam and other Democrats have argued that enforcement is expensive as possession of the drug becomes widespread. They also say it disproportionately jails African Americans.
The measure might see some GOP support. Sen. Siobhan Dunnavant, R-Henrico, supports decriminalization and has expressed support for the use of medical cannabis.
Northam is proposing to do away with criminal prosecution for people arrested with up to a half-ounce of marijuana or about 14 grams. An average joint contains a third to a half of a gram, according to academic and federal estimates.
Right now, possession of that amount could result in a $500 fine and 30 days in jail. A second arrest could result in a $2,500 fine, driver’s license suspension and up to a year in jail.
Northam is also backing legislation that would expunge the records of individuals who have been convicted for possessing up to a half-ounce of marijuana.
He also wants to end the suspension of driver’s licenses for drug crimes, and for driving off without paying for gas at a gas station.
If the marijuana measures are passed, Virginia would join 26 other states that have passed decriminalization measures or eliminated the possibility of jail time for possession of small amounts, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Of those 26, 11 have fully legalized possession of small amounts of marijuana.
On Friday, Northam stopped short of supporting legalization. During a gaggle with reporters, Northam pointed to his career as a pediatrician and said he has concerns about encouraging drug use among young people.
Northam added that he wants to understand how other states are grappling with and implementing legalization, and that he is backing legislation that would call for a formal review of the issue. He said that if a piece of legislation to legalize marijuana arrived at his desk for signature, he would consider it.
Advocates may find a supporter in Attorney General Mark Herring, who wrote in a recent opinion column that Virginia should “start moving toward legal and regulated adult use.” No bills have been filed to fully legalize the drug for recreational use.
Bill Farrar of the ACLU of Virginia said Friday that the state should go further, and “move past incremental discussions about decriminalization.”
“Leaving a civil fine in place will continue to allow police to use a purported odor to disproportionately stop people of color for searches or to charge them with other crimes,” he said in a statement. “There is no reason to wait any longer to simply strike simple possession from the criminal code.”
Northam on Friday also said he will support legislation to make it more difficult for theft to be classified as a felony. In 2018, lawmakers raised the threshold from $200 to $500, the first time it had been raised since 1980. Northam is proposing to double it to $1,000.
It’s a strategy states are moving toward as criminal justice reform advocates note that thresholds set in the 1980s and before have not been adjusted for inflation. Felony convictions, they argue, can hinder offenders from obtaining work, and accessing public housing and welfare.
A 2017 study from The Pew Charitable Trusts found that raising the threshold did not affect downward trends in property crime and theft rates in the 30 states that made the change between 2000 and 2012.
Northam’s criminal reform package also includes bills that would expand the number of people potentially eligible for parole. Virginia abolished parole in 1995, but people sentenced before that are still eligible.
Northam said he would support legislation that would allow people sentenced by jury between 1995 and 2000 to also be eligible, given a court ruling that found jurors were not told parole had been abolished.
Northam also wants people with terminal illnesses and who are permanently disabled to be eligible for parole.
Farrar, of the ACLU, said the governor’s package “touches upon many important aspects of badly needed” reforms, but “falls far short of what is needed.”
Farrar praised the move to permanently end the license suspensions, but said an increase in the theft felony threshold up to $1,500 would be more appropriate. He also said he questioned how the terminally ill and disabled might be cared for if released on parole.


vdare--2020-01-07--Hollywood Reporter: "The Whiteness of 'Toy Story 4'"

Pixar ’ s Toy Story 4 was one of the more disappointing movies released in 2019 , not because it was bad , it was nice , but because Toy Story 3 had been a masterpiece .
So hopes were high .
The Whiteness of ‘ Toy Story 4 ’ 12:44 PM PST 1/3/2020 by Stephen Galloway It ’ s not just near-absence of people of color in the Pixar film that ’ s bothersome , it ’ s the absence of anything approximating life in America as most know it .
… Because in many ways TS4 ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vision of America that might have come from the most die-hard reactionary : lovely if you ’ re wealthy and white , but alarming if you ’ re black or brown or gay or a member of any other minority — in other words , more than half the U.S. population .
True , there are a few characters of color ( including two supporting players voiced by Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele ) ; but each of the leads is Caucasian , and not just the franchise regulars but a host @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fork ( Tony Hale ) that ’ s among the more memorable — and merchandisable — creations of this fourth iteration in the series .
The main child in Toy Story 4 , Bonnie , who is in more of the movie than Andy was in the previous 3 films , is vaguely Latina looking .
But , let ’ s face it , they don ’ t count .
Look at her hair !
As Matthew Cherry , the African American director of animated short Hair Love , recently told The Hollywood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t see yourself represented and you don ’ t see people with your same type of hair seen as the hero and seen as loving and desired , it really does a number on your self-confidence.
” Nor is it just the near-absence of people of color that ’ s bothersome .
It ’ s the absence of anything approximating life in America as most of us know it .
TS4 ’ s main family lives in a big , brightly lit house in an ivory utopia ; its daughter sleeps in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s worth of gizmos ; they drive around in a gas-guzzling RV , stopping for carnivals and carnies that would be right at home in the 1940s or 1950s .
Problems of prejudice , money and unemployment never seem to cross anyone ’ s mind .
… At least Pixar knows it needs to change .
That ’ s why in 2018 it launched the SparkShorts program , designed to foster diverse talent and stories — which has borne fruit with this year ’ s Oscar-shortlisted Kitbull .
Pixar ’ s next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an African American musician , … If you ’ re white and middle-class , as I am , if you drive a nice car and have a safe job , all this may seem moot .
But not if you ’ re the five-year-old , African American girl a friend of mine recently adopted .
I was about to give her Toy Story 4 but I ’ ve changed my mind .
Because it sends the worst sort of message for a child like her : you ’ re an outsider , kept @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fun in American life .
Perhaps by the time she sees Toy Story 5 , whenever that is , we ’ ll have moved on — we ’ ll have reached the end of this make-believe homogeneity , this racism-by-exclusion that ’ s no less pernicious than the real thing .

Pixar’s Toy Story 4 was one of the more disappointing movies released in 2019, not because it was bad, it was nice, but because Toy Story 3 had been a masterpiece. So hopes were high.
The Whiteness of ‘Toy Story 4’
12:44 PM PST 1/3/2020 by Stephen Galloway It’s not just near-absence of people of color in the Pixar film that’s bothersome, it’s the absence of anything approximating life in America as most know it. … Because in many ways TS4’s worldview seems like an Eisenhower-era fantasy, a vision of America that might have come from the most die-hard reactionary: lovely if you’re wealthy and white, but alarming if you’re black or brown or gay or a member of any other minority — in other words, more than half the U.S. population. True, there are a few characters of color (including two supporting players voiced by Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele); but each of the leads is Caucasian, and not just the franchise regulars but a host of new ones including a very white fork (Tony Hale) that’s among the more memorable — and merchandisable — creations of this fourth iteration in the series.
The main child in Toy Story 4, Bonnie, who is in more of the movie than Andy was in the previous 3 films, is vaguely Latina looking.
But, let’s face it, they don’t count. Look at her hair!
As Matthew Cherry, the African American director of animated short Hair Love, recently told The Hollywood Reporter: “When you don’t see yourself represented and you don’t see people with your same type of hair seen as the hero and seen as loving and desired, it really does a number on your self-confidence.” Nor is it just the near-absence of people of color that’s bothersome. It’s the absence of anything approximating life in America as most of us know it. TS4’s main family lives in a big, brightly lit house in an ivory utopia; its daughter sleeps in a plush room packed with a U.S. Treasury’s worth of gizmos; they drive around in a gas-guzzling RV, stopping for carnivals and carnies that would be right at home in the 1940s or 1950s. Problems of prejudice, money and unemployment never seem to cross anyone’s mind. … At least Pixar knows it needs to change. That’s why in 2018 it launched the SparkShorts program, designed to foster diverse talent and stories — which has borne fruit with this year’s Oscar-shortlisted Kitbull. Pixar’s next big release, Soul, centers on an African American musician,
Soul sounds inappropriate. Isn’t the TNC-approved term now Body?
… If you’re white and middle-class, as I am, if you drive a nice car and have a safe job, all this may seem moot. But not if you’re the five-year-old, African American girl a friend of mine recently adopted. I was about to give her Toy Story 4 but I’ve changed my mind. Because it sends the worst sort of message for a child like her: you’re an outsider, kept at a distance from everything fuzzy and fun in American life. Perhaps by the time she sees Toy Story 5, whenever that is, we’ll have moved on — we’ll have reached the end of this make-believe homogeneity, this racism-by-exclusion that’s no less pernicious than the real thing.
[Comment at Unz.com]


vdare--2020-01-07--What Travel Ban? Federal Government IMPORTING "Refugees" From Countries On Terrorist List

We specifically requested the opposite of this .
The federal government has brought nearly 1,400 refugees to the United States over the last year from foreign countries listed on President Donald Trump ’ s constitutional travel ban .
In 2o19 , the State Department imported exactly 1,378 refugees from Chad , Iran , Iraq , Syria , Venezuela , and Yemen — six of the eight countries on Trump ’ s travel ban list , which also includes North Korea and Libya .
This indicates a more than 783 percent increase between 2018 and 2019 of refugees from travel ban @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Imported 1.4K Refugees to U.S. from Travel Ban Countries in 2019 , by John Binder , Breitbart , January 6 , 2020 ] Of course , the reason this is happening is because powerful institutions have a financial interest in making the refugee racket continues .
`` Follow the money , '' as Michelle Malkin states .
There are nine refugee contractors that resettle all refugees for the State Department every year .
These refugee contractors have a vested interest in ensuring as many refugees are resettled across the U.S. because their annual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number of refugees they resettle .
Those refugee contractors include : Church World Service ( CWS ) , Ethiopian Community Development Council ( ECDC ) , Episcopal Migration Ministries ( EMM ) , Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society ( HIAS ) , International Rescue Committee ( IRC ) , U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants ( USCRI ) , Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services ( LIRS ) , U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops ( USCCB ) , and World Relief Corporation ( WR ) .
I 'm always reminded of Enoch Powell 's quote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre . ''
Much like America has socialism for the rich and capitalism for everyone else , we have a system that rewards churches and so-called `` non-profits '' for importing dependents that Americans must subsidize .
It 's the triumph of special interests over citizens .
Conservatives already work to prevent the federal government from subsidizing Planned Parenthood .
They should be working to stop the federal government from funding `` nonprofits '' who reap massive returns from destroying our country .
Even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that .

We specifically requested the opposite of this.
The federal government has brought nearly 1,400 refugees to the United States over the last year from foreign countries listed on President Donald Trump’s constitutional travel ban. In 2o19, the State Department imported exactly 1,378 refugees from Chad, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen — six of the eight countries on Trump’s travel ban list, which also includes North Korea and Libya. This indicates a more than 783 percent increase between 2018 and 2019 of refugees from travel ban countries arriving in the U.S. [Feds Imported 1.4K Refugees to U.S. from Travel Ban Countries in 2019, by John Binder, Breitbart, January 6, 2020]
Of course, the reason this is happening is because powerful institutions have a financial interest in making the refugee racket continues. "Follow the money," as Michelle Malkin states.
There are nine refugee contractors that resettle all refugees for the State Department every year. These refugee contractors have a vested interest in ensuring as many refugees are resettled across the U.S. because their annual federally funded budgets are contingent on the number of refugees they resettle. Those refugee contractors include: Church World Service (CWS), Ethiopian Community Development Council (ECDC), Episcopal Migration Ministries (EMM), Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), International Rescue Committee (IRC), U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI), Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services (LIRS), U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), and World Relief Corporation (WR).
I'm always reminded of Enoch Powell's quote that "it's like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre." Much like America has socialism for the rich and capitalism for everyone else, we have a system that rewards churches and so-called "non-profits" for importing dependents that Americans must subsidize. It's the triumph of special interests over citizens.
Conservatives already work to prevent the federal government from subsidizing Planned Parenthood. They should be working to stop the federal government from funding "nonprofits" who reap massive returns from destroying our country. Even fiscal conservatives should be on board with that.


vdare--2020-01-07--Good News For Kobach—Pompeo Isn’t Running In Kansas

There may be one domestic upside from the tensions with Iran—it ’ s keeping Secretary of State Mike Pompeo from running for Senate .
The New York Times reported Monday that Pompeo told Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell—who wanted Pompeo to run for Senate in Kansas—that he would remain as secretary of state for the rest of 2020 .
[ Mike Pompeo Is Said to Decide Against Running for Senate in Kansas , by Maggie Haberman , Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns , New York Times , January 6 , 2019 ] Pompeo reportedly told McConnell it would be “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tensions with Iran and his departure would hurt his presidential ambitions in 2024 .
The filing deadline for the Kansas Senate race is in June , but sources told the Times it ’ s unlikely Pompeo will change his mind in the meantime .
Pompeo was the favored candidate of the GOP establishment and reportedly of Trump as well .
The main beneficiary of this news is immigration patriot Kris Kobach .
Kobach is the current frontrunner in the race , in spite of vicious opposition from the establishment .
He has a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pompeo out of the race .
All polls show Kobach well ahead of his competitors .
The only one who closely matches Kobach ’ s support is Pompeo .
A poll conducted by the National Republican Senatorial Committee—which despises Kobach—found Kobach leads the GOP field with 43 percent support .
U.S. Rep. Roger Marshall was a distant second at 24 percent support .
However , the NRSC poll claimed that Kobach ’ s support would evaporate if Pompeo entered the race .
In that hypothetical , 54 percent of GOP voters would support @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kobach .
[ GOP Poll : Kobach Would Win Kansas Senate Primary , Unless Pompeo Jumps In , by Lindsay Wise , The Wall Street Journal , December 12 , 2019 ] However , a poll conducted by the Free Forever PAC that same month showed Kobach and Pompeo in a dead heat at 26 percent .
That same poll also shows Kobach as the clear frontrunner without Pompeo .
With Pompeo out of the way , Kobach can rest easy knowing Trump likely won ’ t endorse any of his opponents .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @

washingtonwatcherii@protonmail.com (Washington  Watcher II)

There may be one domestic upside from the tensions with Iran—it’s keeping Secretary of State Mike Pompeo from running for Senate.
The New York Times reported Monday that Pompeo told Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell—who wanted Pompeo to run for Senate in Kansas—that he would remain as secretary of state for the rest of 2020. [Mike Pompeo Is Said to Decide Against Running for Senate in Kansas, by Maggie Haberman, Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns, New York Times, January 6, 2019] Pompeo reportedly told McConnell it would be “irresponsible” to leave his job amid tensions with Iran and his departure would hurt his presidential ambitions in 2024.
The filing deadline for the Kansas Senate race is in June, but sources told the Times it’s unlikely Pompeo will change his mind in the meantime. Pompeo was the favored candidate of the GOP establishment and reportedly of Trump as well.
The main beneficiary of this news is immigration patriot Kris Kobach. Kobach is the current frontrunner in the race, in spite of vicious opposition from the establishment. He has a good shot of winning the nomination with Pompeo out of the race. All polls show Kobach well ahead of his competitors. The only one who closely matches Kobach’s support is Pompeo.
A poll conducted by the National Republican Senatorial Committee—which despises Kobach—found Kobach leads the GOP field with 43 percent support. U.S. Rep. Roger Marshall was a distant second at 24 percent support. However, the NRSC poll claimed that Kobach’s support would evaporate if Pompeo entered the race. In that hypothetical, 54 percent of GOP voters would support Pompeo while only 17 percent would back Kobach. [GOP Poll: Kobach Would Win Kansas Senate Primary, Unless Pompeo Jumps In, by Lindsay Wise, The Wall Street Journal, December 12, 2019]
However, a poll conducted by the Free Forever PAC that same month showed Kobach and Pompeo in a dead heat at 26 percent. That same poll also shows Kobach as the clear frontrunner without Pompeo.
2020 Kansas Senate - Republican Primary:
Kobach 33%
Marshall 18%
Lindstrom 5%
Wagle 4%
Pruitt 1%
Undecided 39%
.
Kobach 26%
Pompeo 26%
Marshall 13%
Lindstrom 5%
Pruitt 2%
Undecided 30%@trafalgar_group / Free Forever PAC 12/3-11https://t.co/FpjoVBNTrr #KSsen — Political Polls (@Politics_Polls) December 22, 2019
With Pompeo out of the way, Kobach can rest easy knowing Trump likely won’t endorse any of his opponents. This is his race to win.


vdare--2020-01-05--Is It Because Criminals Are Overwhelmingly Black? In Atlanta, Police Department Institutes a No-Chas

Is It Because Criminals Are Overwhelmingly Black? In Atlanta, Police Department Institutes a No-Chase Policy Toward Criminals, Effective Immediately

Earlier : In Overwhelmingly White Buckhead Community of Atlanta , Citizens Irate Black-Run City Stopped Police from Responding to Shoplifting/Property @ @ @ @ @ Mecca .
It ’ s a majority black city , though gentrification is civilizing once @ @ @ @ @ where criminality is almost exclusively a black vocation and avocation .
In 2018 Atlanta , @ @ @ @ @ s Uniform Crime Report shows blacks were 10 times more likely than whites to be @ @ @ @ @ one has broken down these numbers before save your friendly neighborhood realist at SBPDL ) @ @ @ @ @ The police department will no longer chase suspects ( who happen to almost always be @ @ @

Earlier: In Overwhelmingly White Buckhead Community of Atlanta, Citizens Irate Black-Run City Stopped Police from Responding to Shoplifting/Property Crimes
Atlanta is the Black Mecca. It’s a majority black city, though gentrification is civilizing once drug infested communities quickly, where criminality is almost exclusively a black vocation and avocation.
In 2018 Atlanta, the Atlanta Police Department’s Uniform Crime Report shows blacks were 10 times more likely than whites to be arrested for homicide (no one has broken down these numbers before save your friendly neighborhood realist at SBPDL).
And guess what? The police department will no longer chase suspects (who happen to almost always be black).
Atlanta police begins no-chase policy effective immediately, WSBTV.com, January 4, 2020 ATLANTA — Atlanta Police Chief Erika Shields sent out a department-wide email notifying officers that the department will no longer chase suspects. Shields cited the risk to the safety of the officers and the public for each chase, and “knowing that the judicial system is largely unresponsive to the actions of the defendants.”


vdare--2020-01-07--Michelle Malkin: Stop Exporting US Troops To/ Stop Importing People From/ Countries That Hate Our Gu

Michelle Malkin: Stop Exporting US Troops To/ Stop Importing People From/ Countries That Hate Our Guts

My plan to `` Keep America Great '' is very simple : • Stop exporting American soldiers to countries that hate our guts .
• Stop importing people from countries that hate our guts .
When I voted for Donald Trump in 2016 , I thought this was the plan .
The `` America First '' champion rightly assailed Barack Obama for recklessly endangering the lives of our soldiers to pursue politically driven endless wars .
President Trump promised to build an effective wall on the southern border .
He enacted tough travel restrictions , upheld by the U.S. Supreme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ terror-coddling governments pose national security threats .
Yet , here we are at the dawn of 2020 with thousands of U.S. troops headed back to the Stone Age Middle East maw , Mexican drug cartels on the loose while our Border Patrol hands out diapers to illegal immigrants and refugees from around the world—including nearly 1,400 welcomed just last year from the very high-risk countries the Trump travel ban was supposed to block—transforming the nation without the consent of the governed .
The leaky block list includes Syria , Iraq and Iran , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ late Tuesday in retaliation for our deadly airstrike last week that killed Quds General Qassem Soleimani .
Now , we are on heightened alert here in our homeland with authorities nervous that Hezbollah sleeper cells ( which I 've documented since writing `` Invasion '' in 2002 ) might strike from within .
Some of you still wonder why I write so frequently and vehemently about our failed immigration and entrance policies .
It 's because nothing matters more right now to the survival of our country than the right to determine who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
As I reported last year , thanks to an executive order signed by Trump in September , local communities were given the explicit opt-in rights to stem the lucrative tide of refugees coming largely from Third World countries and jihadist breeding grounds .
This Wednesday , religious `` charities '' that profit the most from this multi-billion-dollar racket will be in court to assert blanket , open-borders veto power over the people .
The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland will hear arguments from vested refugee resettlement interests who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to obtain written consent from all localities and states in which they plan to resettle refugees .
The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society , Church World Service and Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service—three of the nine State Department partners who resettle all refugees—argue that the federal government should prioritize family reunification of foreign refugees over local control .
Translation : Americans come last .
The lawsuit assails the White House executive order for threatening `` to systematically dismantle the organizations—including Plaintiffs—that have spent decades developing networks , expertise , and resources to carry out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' Those `` resources '' come from you and me : Tax subsidies that constitute the vast majority of these nonprofit activists ' budgets .
Over the past decade , according to an analysis by immigration researcher James Simpson , the three plaintiff groups have raked in the following amounts from the federal refugee resettlement program : • Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services : $ 471.6 million ( 94 % from of its budget ) .
The refugee resettlement contractors , in turn , spread their massive wealth—from both public and private sources—to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democratic voters , fill their pews and recruit new clients and constituents .
The `` Interfaith Immigration Coalition '' holding a protest event after the hearing on Wednesday to support the refugee pipeline includes : Columban Center for Advocacy and Outreach ; Congregation of Our Lady of Charity of the Good Shepherd ; U.S .
Provinces ; Daughters of Charity ; Disciples Refugee & Immigration Ministries ; Franciscan Action Network ; Interfaith Immigration Coalition ; Jewish Council for Public Affairs ; Leadership Conference of Women Religious ; National Advocacy Center of the Sisters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Jewish Women ; Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism ; Rise for Refuge ; Sisters of Mercy of the Americas - Institute Leadership Team ; T'ruah ; The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights ; The United Church of Christ ; and We Are All America .
Thanks to pressure from these groups with bottomless budgets and clout , 18 Republican—yes , Republican—governors are also standing against Trump and self-determination in favor of increased refugee settlement , including : Doug Ducey of Arizona , Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas , Eric Holcomb of Indiana @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Little of Idaho , Mike Parsons of Missouri , Larry Hogan of Maryland , Charlie Baker of Massachusetts , Mike DeWine of Ohio , Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma , Pete Ricketts of Nebraska , Chris Sununu of New Hampshire , Doug Burgum of North Dakota , Kristi Noem of South Dakota , Bill Lee of Tennessee , Gary Herbert of Utah , Jim Justice of West Virginia and Phil Scott of Vermont .
The names must be named and the sellouts must be shamed , especially as war breaks out on all fronts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ young American troops to fight enemies `` over there '' if we are welcoming them by the tens and hundreds of thousands over here ?
Michelle Malkin [ Email her ] is the author of Invasion : How America Still Welcomes Terrorists , Criminals , and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores .
Click here for Peter Brimelow ’ s review .
Click here for Michelle Malkin 's website .
Michelle Malkin is also the author of Unhinged : Exposing Liberals Gone Wild , Culture of Corruption : Obama and his Team of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Who Built That : Awe-Inspiring Stories of American Tinkerpreneurs , and Sold Out : How High-Tech Billionaires & Bipartisan Beltway Crapweasels Are Screwing America 's Best & Brightest Workers .
Malkin is author of the book , `` Open Borders , Inc. : Who 's Funding America 's Destruction , '' available directly from VDARE.com in hardcover .
To find out more about Michelle Malkin and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists , visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com .

My plan to "Keep America Great" is very simple:
When I voted for Donald Trump in 2016, I thought this was the plan. The "America First" champion rightly assailed Barack Obama for recklessly endangering the lives of our soldiers to pursue politically driven endless wars. President Trump promised to build an effective wall on the southern border. He enacted tough travel restrictions, upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, on visitors from countries whose terror-coddling governments pose national security threats.
Yet, here we are at the dawn of 2020 with thousands of U.S. troops headed back to the Stone Age Middle East maw, Mexican drug cartels on the loose while our Border Patrol hands out diapers to illegal immigrants and refugees from around the world—including nearly 1,400 welcomed just last year from the very high-risk countries the Trump travel ban was supposed to block—transforming the nation without the consent of the governed. The leaky block list includes Syria, Iraq and Iran, which launched multiple missiles at U.S. airbases late Tuesday in retaliation for our deadly airstrike last week that killed Quds General Qassem Soleimani.
Now, we are on heightened alert here in our homeland with authorities nervous that Hezbollah sleeper cells (which I've documented since writing "Invasion" in 2002) might strike from within.
Some of you still wonder why I write so frequently and vehemently about our failed immigration and entrance policies. It's because nothing matters more right now to the survival of our country than the right to determine who gets in and the ability to enforce it.
As I reported last year, thanks to an executive order signed by Trump in September, local communities were given the explicit opt-in rights to stem the lucrative tide of refugees coming largely from Third World countries and jihadist breeding grounds. This Wednesday, religious "charities" that profit the most from this multi-billion-dollar racket will be in court to assert blanket, open-borders veto power over the people.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland will hear arguments from vested refugee resettlement interests who oppose Trump's order requiring government contractors to obtain written consent from all localities and states in which they plan to resettle refugees. The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, Church World Service and Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service—three of the nine State Department partners who resettle all refugees—argue that the federal government should prioritize family reunification of foreign refugees over local control. Translation: Americans come last.
The lawsuit assails the White House executive order for threatening "to systematically dismantle the organizations—including Plaintiffs—that have spent decades developing networks, expertise, and resources to carry out the American ideal of welcoming refugees." Those "resources" come from you and me: Tax subsidies that constitute the vast majority of these nonprofit activists' budgets. Over the past decade, according to an analysis by immigration researcher James Simpson, the three plaintiff groups have raked in the following amounts from the federal refugee resettlement program:
Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services: $471.6 million (94% from of its budget.)
Church World Service: $433.3 million (72% of its budget).
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society: $186.1 million (54% of its budget).
The refugee resettlement contractors, in turn, spread their massive wealth—from both public and private sources—to a galaxy of subcontractors looking to register Democratic voters, fill their pews and recruit new clients and constituents. The "Interfaith Immigration Coalition" holding a protest event after the hearing on Wednesday to support the refugee pipeline includes: Columban Center for Advocacy and Outreach; Congregation of Our Lady of Charity of the Good Shepherd; U.S. Provinces; Daughters of Charity; Disciples Refugee & Immigration Ministries; Franciscan Action Network; Interfaith Immigration Coalition; Jewish Council for Public Affairs; Leadership Conference of Women Religious; National Advocacy Center of the Sisters of the Good Shepherd; National Council of Jewish Women; Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism; Rise for Refuge; Sisters of Mercy of the Americas—Institute Leadership Team; T'ruah; The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights; The United Church of Christ; and We Are All America.
Thanks to pressure from these groups with bottomless budgets and clout, 18 Republican—yes, Republican—governors are also standing against Trump and self-determination in favor of increased refugee settlement, including: Doug Ducey of Arizona, Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas, Eric Holcomb of Indiana, Kim Reynolds of Iowa, Brad Little of Idaho, Mike Parsons of Missouri, Larry Hogan of Maryland, Charlie Baker of Massachusetts, Mike DeWine of Ohio, Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma, Pete Ricketts of Nebraska, Chris Sununu of New Hampshire, Doug Burgum of North Dakota, Kristi Noem of South Dakota, Bill Lee of Tennessee, Gary Herbert of Utah, Jim Justice of West Virginia and Phil Scott of Vermont.
The names must be named and the sellouts must be shamed, especially as war breaks out on all fronts. What's the point of sending young American troops to fight enemies "over there" if we are welcoming them by the tens and hundreds of thousands over here?
COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM
Michelle Malkin [Email her] is the author of Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores. Click here for Peter Brimelow’s review. Click here for Michelle Malkin's website. Michelle Malkin is also the author of Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild, Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies, ,Who Built That: Awe-Inspiring Stories of American Tinkerpreneurs, and Sold Out: How High-Tech Billionaires & Bipartisan Beltway Crapweasels Are Screwing America's Best & Brightest Workers.
Malkin is author of the book, "Open Borders, Inc.: Who's Funding America's Destruction," available directly from VDARE.com in hardcover. To find out more about Michelle Malkin and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM


vdare--2020-01-07--NEW YORK TIMES Attacks PragerU For WrongThink

Arguably , one of the best things about Monday is the posting of a new PragerU video online .
The brief films are aimed primarily at young people who are poorly served by modern education which seems reluctant to teach the vital historical component of how we got to where we are today .
Interestingly , Churchill biographer Andrew Roberts remarked to interviewer Mark Levin on Sunday , “ The problem is that the educational establishment don ’ t believe in great men and women any longer .
They see for ideological reasons of their own , and the idea @ @ @ @ @ @ @ else , and so they won ’ t teach about heroes.
” History bereft of humans—both heroes and villains—is pretty hollow , so PragerU fills a big hole .
Founder Dennis Prager testified before a Senate committee last summer about his purpose in creating the videos and dedication to defending free speech in America .
Meanwhile , the mainstream media treats PragerU like an insect being dissected in a high school biology class , analyzing the details at length while missing the big picture .
That ’ s what appeared in the New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ It ’ s Fox News for Teenagers , in Short Videos.
” That title makes the PragerU videos sound dumbed down which they definitely are not .
The most recent edition , from January 6 , features a discussion by Brit Niall Ferguson about the life and influence of Margaret Thatcher , a piece suitable for an educated adult desiring a brief refresher on the unique prime minister .
Still , the article provides history I didn ’ t know , one example being that Dennis Prager initially envisioned a traditional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be prohibitively expensive .
The Times article was reprinted elsewhere , so click freely on the link following to read the whole piece : Right-Wing Views for Generation Z , Five Minutes at a Time , New York Times , January 4 , 2020 BERKELEY , Calif.—Will Witt walked through the University of California campus doing what he does professionally , which is trolling unwitting young liberals on camera .
He approached students who seemed like good targets : people with political buttons on their bags , androgynous clothing , scarves .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ majority here in the heart of progressive culture would be liberal .
Mr. Witt , whose bouffant and confident smile make him look like a high school jock from central casting , told the students that he had a question for them .
If they agreed to answer , and they usually did , the game was on .
“ How many genders are there ?
” Mr. Witt asked before turning and staring deadpan at the camera .
Some people laughed and walked away .
Most , knowing the camera was rolling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you want ?
” a recent Ph.D. student responded , a little confused to be confronted with this question .
After some of the footage was edited in the back of an S.U.V .
in a parking lot nearby , the video headed to Prager University , a growing hub of the online right-wing media machine , where Mr. Witt is a rising star and the jokey , Ray-Ban-wearing embodiment of the site ’ s ambitions .
Last year PragerU videos racked up more than one billion views , the company said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 6,500 high school and college student promoters , known as the PragerForce , who host on-campus meetings and gather at least once a year for conventions .
And this year , the company is expanding its scope .
PragerU executives are signing stars of the young new right to host made-for-the-internet shows to fuel 2020 content , including a book club and a show geared to Hispanics called Americanos .
The goal of the people behind all of this—Dennis Prager , the conservative talk show host and impresario of this digital empire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ funders—seems simple : more Will Witts in the world .
More pride in American history ( and less panic over racism ) , more religion ( specifically in the “ Judeo-Christian ” tradition ) , less illegal immigration , more young people laughing at people on the left rather than joining them .
Mr. Witt , 23 , said he was raised in a relatively liberal home by his mother , and when he arrived at the University of Colorado in Boulder , he was already leaning conservative .
But he found his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
One of his classes offered students extra credit for going to a political protest .
Mr. Witt submitted that he would go to a nearby speech hosted by the right-wing star Milo Yiannopoulos .
The teaching assistant told him that would not count , he said .
He was frustrated , feeling lonely and at home watching videos on YouTube .
The site prompted him with a bright animation made by PragerU .
He can ’ t remember the first video he saw .
Maybe railing against feminism , he said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ one that night , ” Mr. Witt said .
“ I stopped going to class .
Pretty much all the time I was reading and watching.
” He did not graduate from college .
The videos are five minutes each , quick , full of graphs and grand extrapolations , and unapologetically conservative .
Lessons have titles like : “ Why Socialism Never Works ” ( a series ) , “ Fossil Fuels : The Greenest Energy , ” “ Where Are the Moderate Muslims ?
” and “ Are Some Cultures Better @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and funders of PragerU , YouTube is a way to circumvent brick-and-mortar classrooms—and parents—and appeal to Generation Z , those born in the mid-1990s and early 2000s .
Mr. Prager sees those young people as more indoctrinated in left-wing viewpoints than any previous generation , but also as more curious about the right .
For these teenagers , consuming conservative content is a rebellion from campus politics that are liberal and moving left .
“ We find more of them are open to hearing an alternative voice than many of their elders , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Many suspect they have been given only one view , and suspect that view may often be absurd.
” The way PragerU presents that “ alternative voice ” is in the measured tone of an online university , carefully avoiding the news cycle and President Trump .
That is part of its power .
“ They take old arguments about the threat of immigration but treat them as common sense and almost normative , wrapping them up as a university with a neutral dispassionate voice , ” said Chris Chavez , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Oregon ’ s School of Journalism and Communication .
PragerU ’ s website has a fine-print disclaimer that it is not an actual academic institution .
“ PragerU ’ s ‘ 5 Minute Ideas ’ videos have become an indispensable propaganda device for the right , ” the Southern Poverty Law Center warned on its blog , citing videos like “ Blacks in Power Don ’ t Empower Blacks , ” hosted by the Wall Street Journal columnist Jason Riley , who is black .
Lawrence Rosenthal , chair of the Berkeley @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has noticed an impact from PragerU ’ s content .
“ It sits at this border between going off a cliff into conspiracy thinking and extreme kinds of prejudices in the name of anti-political correctness , ” he said .
On PragerU ’ s website , there is little differentiation between its video presenters .
So the late Pulitzer-prize winning Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer appears on the same page as Michelle Malkin , the commentator who has defended overtly racist elements of the right .
There ’ s Bret Stephens , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Carlson , the Fox News host ; George F. Will , the anti-Trump conservative commentator ; and Nigel Farage , the Brexit Party leader .
For a teenager approaching the site , each headshot in the same size circle , it would be hard to tell the difference between them all .
( Continues )

Arguably, one of the best things about Monday is the posting of a new PragerU video online. The brief films are aimed primarily at young people who are poorly served by modern education, which seems reluctant to teach the vital historical component of how we got to where we are today.
Interestingly, Churchill biographer Andrew Roberts remarked to interviewer Mark Levin on Sunday, “The problem is that the educational establishment don’t believe in great men and women any longer. They see for ideological reasons of their own, and the idea that no one is greater than anybody else, and so they won’t teach about heroes.”
History bereft of humans—both heroes and villains—is pretty hollow, so PragerU fills a big hole.
Founder Dennis Prager testified before a Senate committee last summer about his purpose in creating the videos and dedication to defending free speech in America.
Meanwhile, the mainstream media treats PragerU like an insect being dissected in a high school biology class, analyzing the details at length while missing the big picture. That’s what appeared in the New York Times Sunday front page article titled, “It’s Fox News for Teenagers, in Short Videos.”
That title makes the PragerU videos sound dumbed down, which they definitely are not. The most recent edition, from January 6, features a discussion by Brit Niall Ferguson about the life and influence of Margaret Thatcher, a piece suitable for an educated adult desiring a brief refresher on the unique prime minister.
Still, the article provides history I didn’t know, one example being that Dennis Prager initially envisioned a traditional college but a brick-and-mortar edifice would have been prohibitively expensive.
The Times article was reprinted elsewhere, so click freely on the link following to read the whole piece:


vdare--2020-01-07--Joshua Foxworth: Time to End Affirmative Action

See , earlier , by Joshua Foxworth : Make No Mistake : The GOP is Losing Texas American Thinker , September 13 , 2019 VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow writes : In the late 1970s , I believed that Affirmative Action a.k.a .
quotas was the key emerging issue in American politics and that opposing it was a path to victory for the GOP/GAP .
Indeed , with a fellow staffer , I succeeded in scuppering the Supreme Court ambitions of my employer , Senator Orrin Hatch , by persuading him to enter into the Congressional Record a definitive compendium of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ until then had been generally suppressed .
( Hatch , needless to say , subsequently ran away ) .
Disquiet about Affirmative Action , although unreported , was so intense that the Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg believed it was key factor in Ronald Reagan ’ s 1984 re-election .
But of course it was still ignored , and more recently I myself have been preoccupied by the even more threatening post-1965 immigration disaster .
Now , suddenly , not just us journalistic scribblers but some Congressional candidates are explicitly raising the latter—and one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Whaddya know ?
“ Affirmative Action ” refers to the preferences in education , hiring , and promotions , as well as quotas and guarantees in government contracts , and exclusive legal protections which are currently implemented at both the state and federal level .
These policies are both an economic drain on America , as well as fundamentally at odds with American legal and moral systems .
It is time to end these policies .
A country ’ s economy can only reach its full potential when it allows its best @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Affirmative Action system ensures that men and women who would otherwise attend college , run a business , or climb the corporate ladder are prevented from doing these things based on a standard other than worthiness .
As a result , America ’ s government and its economy are led by those who are selected by policy instead of merit .
This system will inevitably fail to produce as effectively as one designed around competence .
In addition to these costs , there are numerous direct drains .
A 2011 study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the cost of diversity and Affirmative Action policies at that university were $ 40 million a year—a sum that comes to almost $ 2,000 per year per student [ In search of the real cost for UW diversity programs , by W. Lee Hansen , Madison.com , November 5 , 2011 ] The implementation of these policies at NASA has resulted in engineers with advanced degrees being relegated to little more than temp workers who have to pay subcontracting companies for the privilege of working .
See my Affirmative Action and NASA , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
25 years ago , VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow calculated the cost of these programs to be 4 % of GDP .
When Quotas Replace Merit , Everybody Suffers , Forbes Magazine , May 5 , 1993 However , it is not possible to truly calculate the opportunity cost when capable young people are passed over for opportunities in favor of those who are less qualified , but more desirable to the government .
One reason for this : these effects span generations as the affected men and women are less capable of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their own children .
Intergenerational privilege then requires the cancelling of any metric that countersignals the existence of this privilege .
[ A record number of colleges drop SAT/ACT admissions requirement amid growing disenchantment with standardized tests , by Valerie Strauss , Washington Post , October 18 , 2019 ] Some examples of these opportunity costs : a 2015 study which found that these policies were equal to a 230 SAT point bonus for African Americans and a 185 point bonus for Latino applicants to universities .
[ For Asian Americans , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Frank Shyong , LA Times , February 21 , 2015 ] Recently , it was found that Harvard sent out recruitment letters to African Americans and Latinos that scored hundreds of points lower than whites and Asians .
In 2011 , it was found that at UW-Madison , African American and Latino students were 500 times more likely to be admitted than similarly qualified whites .
The societal effects of these policies are far greater than the economic ones .
The laws act as government proclamations that one population is irredeemable on its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offset this group ’ s aggression towards the protected groups .
These policies therefore codify into law the belief that one people group is inherently unjust .
This mindset has far reaching consequences on the society .
These consequences can range from people attempting to mask their identity in an effort to assuage animus and/or to take advantage of some of the preferences and protections , all the way to a general acceptance of economic and physical violence against the group as well as a refusal to report on and the general dismissal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
[ Dallas DA reveals plan for 'ending mass incarceration ' for petty crimes , slashing probation and bail , by Sarah Sarder and Cary Aspinwall , Dallas News , April 11 , 2019 , , ] The assertion by the government that all other groups require protection from one specific group will always lead to the general acceptance of punishment for that group .
Indeed , looking at how Affirmative Action policies are implemented and discussed shows that punishment—not equality—is the primary objective .
There are numerous groups that economically outperform whites @ @ @ @ @ @ @ men earned more than their White , Black , and Hispanic counterparts in 2017 , BLS.gov , August 29 , 2018 ] However , equalizing this difference or the difference between these groups and lower performing groups is never discussed .
The only inequality addressed is that between whites and lower performing groups and the only cause entertained is malfeasance .
The inevitable conclusion of this is that the only acceptable outcome in America is one where all other groups economically outperform whites and any deviation from this is the result of ill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ equitable nor just .
This is not equality and it is not legitimate .
It is time to end these programs .
Joshua Foxworth [ Email him—tweet him ] is a Marine , an aerospace engineer , a tech entrepreneur , and a candidate for US Congress in Texas District 14 .
His American Thinker archive can be found here .

See, earlier, by Joshua Foxworth: Make No Mistake: The GOP is Losing Texas , American Thinker, September 13, 2019
VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow writes: In the late 1970s, I believed that Affirmative Action a.k.a. quotas was the key emerging issue in American politics and that opposing it was a path to victory for the GOP/GAP. Indeed, with a fellow staffer, I succeeded in scuppering the Supreme Court ambitions of my employer, Senator Orrin Hatch, by persuading him to enter into the Congressional Record a definitive compendium of the arguments against Affirmative Action, which until then had been generally suppressed. (Hatch, needless to say, subsequently ran away.) Disquiet about Affirmative Action, although unreported, was so intense that the Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg believed it was key factor in Ronald Reagan’s 1984 re-election. But of course it was still ignored, and more recently I myself have been preoccupied by the even more threatening post-1965 immigration disaster. Now, suddenly, not just us journalistic scribblers but some Congressional candidates are explicitly raising the latter—and one, Joshua Foxworth, is raising both. Whaddya know?
“Affirmative Action” refers to the preferences in education, hiring, and promotions, as well as quotas and guarantees in government contracts, and exclusive legal protections which are currently implemented at both the state and federal level. These policies are both an economic drain on America, as well as fundamentally at odds with American legal and moral systems.
It is time to end these policies.
The economic cost of Affirmative Action
A country’s economy can only reach its full potential when it allows its best and brightest to achieve their full potential. The Affirmative Action system ensures that men and women who would otherwise attend college, run a business, or climb the corporate ladder are prevented from doing these things based on a standard other than worthiness. As a result, America’s government and its economy are led by those who are selected by policy instead of merit. This system will inevitably fail to produce as effectively as one designed around competence.
In addition to these costs, there are numerous direct drains. A 2011 study from the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that the cost of diversity and Affirmative Action policies at that university were $40 million a year—a sum that comes to almost $2,000 per year per student. [In search of the real cost for UW diversity programs, by W. Lee Hansen, Madison.com, November 5, 2011]
The implementation of these policies at NASA has resulted in engineers with advanced degrees being relegated to little more than temp workers who have to pay subcontracting companies for the privilege of working. See my Affirmative Action and NASA, American Thinker, September 20, 2019.
25 years ago, VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow calculated the cost of these programs to be 4% of GDP. [When Quotas Replace Merit, Everybody Suffers, Forbes Magazine, May 5, 1993 However, it is not possible to truly calculate the opportunity cost when capable young people are passed over for opportunities in favor of those who are less qualified, but more desirable to the government. One reason for this: These effects span generations as the affected men and women are less capable of starting a family and creating opportunities for their own children. Intergenerational privilege then requires the cancelling of any metric that countersignals the existence of this privilege. [A record number of colleges drop SAT/ACT admissions requirement amid growing disenchantment with standardized tests, by Valerie Strauss, Washington Post, October 18, 2019]
Some examples of these opportunity costs: a 2015 study which found that these policies were equal to a 230 SAT point bonus for African Americans and a 185 point bonus for Latino applicants to universities. [For Asian Americans, a changing landscape on college admissions, by Frank Shyong, LA Times, February 21, 2015]Recently, it was found that Harvard sent out recruitment letters to African Americans and Latinos that scored hundreds of points lower than whites and Asians. In 2011, it was found that at UW-Madison, African American and Latino students were 500 times more likely to be admitted than similarly qualified whites.
The societal cost of Affirmative Action
The societal effects of these policies are far greater than the economic ones. The laws act as government proclamations that one population is irredeemable on its own and government intervention is required to offset this group’s aggression towards the protected groups. These policies therefore codify into law the belief that one people group is inherently unjust.
This mindset has far reaching consequences on the society. These consequences can range from people attempting to mask their identity in an effort to assuage animus and/or to take advantage of some of the preferences and protections, all the way to a general acceptance of economic and physical violence against the group as well as a refusal to report on and the general dismissal of violence committed by the protected groups. [Dallas DA reveals plan for 'ending mass incarceration' for petty crimes, slashing probation and bail, by Sarah Sarder and Cary Aspinwall, Dallas News, April 11, 2019, ,]The assertion by the government that all other groups require protection from one specific group will always lead to the general acceptance of punishment for that group.
Indeed, looking at how Affirmative Action policies are implemented and discussed shows that punishment—not equality—is the primary objective. There are numerous groups that economically outperform whites in America. [Asian women and men earned more than their White, Black, and Hispanic counterparts in 2017, BLS.gov, August 29, 2018] However, equalizing this difference or the difference between these groups and lower performing groups is never discussed. The only inequality addressed is that between whites and lower performing groups and the only cause entertained is malfeasance.
The inevitable conclusion of this is that the only acceptable outcome in America is one where all other groups economically outperform whites and any deviation from this is the result of ill intent. Such a society is neither equitable nor just.
This is not equality and it is not legitimate. It is time to end these programs.
Joshua Foxworth [Email him—tweet him] is a Marine, an aerospace engineer, a tech entrepreneur, and a candidate for US Congress in Texas District 14. His American Thinker archive can be found here.


vdare--2020-01-07--CNN Settles For Undisclosed Amount With Covington Kids: Litigation Works!

It 's just been reported that CNN has settled the lawsuit brought by the Covington Catholic schoolboys who were attacked by Black Hebrew protesters , a real Indian who was a phony veteran , the MSM including CNN , and ...
Conservatism , Inc. See CNN settles $ 275M lawsuit with Covington Catholic student Nick Sandmann | Network accused in lawsuit of 'bullying ' Kentucky teen , by Valerie Richardson , The Washington Times , January 7 , 2020 .
You can also see it on CNN , reported by Oliver Darcy , if you consider that a credible source @ @ @ @ @ @ @ corporation , which knows everything about the settlement , is n't telling its employee Darcy anything— '' No other details were immediately available.
`` There are three things to remember about this .
1 .
Everything the media said about this proved to be wrong .
2 .
Conservatism , Inc , fell for it hook , line , and sinker , and 3 .
Litigation works .
Even something the size of CNN can fold in the face of the American legal system .
On the first point , see Ann Coulter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The WASHINGTON POST—Don ’ t Try Too Hard To Get It Right , Michelle Malkin : The Covington Rorschach Test , or Gateway Pundit 's HUGE !
MEDIA BACKTRACKS FROM LIES : AP Admits Students “ Were Singing ” with Phillips — CNN ’ s Tapper “ Video Contradicts ” Phillips ’ s Claims – NRO Removes Hit Piece .
On the second , see Cuckservatives Fall For Extremely Fake News About MAGA-Hat Wearing Schoolboys—Like They Always Fall For Anti-White Fake News He climbed down later , but , as noted by Gateway @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to delete not just Tweets , but an actual article , saying ( archive link ) The Covington Students Might as Well Have Just Spit on the Cross By Nicholas Frankovich It appears that most of the teenagers in this video are from a Catholic high school near Covington , Kentucky , across the Ohio River from Cincinnati .
They mock a serious , frail-looking older man and gloat in their momentary role as Roman soldiers to his Christ .
“ Bullying ” is a worn-out word and doesn ’ t convey the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here .
For some of us , the gospel stories of Jesus ’ s passion and death are so familiar we no longer hear them .
The evangelists are terse in their descriptions of the humiliations heaped on Jesus in the final hours before his crucifixion , the consummate humiliation .
Read the accounts again or , if you ’ d rather not , watch the video .
The human capacity for sadism is too great .
[ More ] The is absolutely mental , but the capacity of cuckservatives to believe evil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as we saw in the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman case , the Baltimore Riots , and the Ferguson Riots .
The most obvious case was when Rich Lowry , who also fell for the Covington Catholic hoax , wrote about the Zimmerman/Martin case that “ Al Sharpton is Right.
” [ NRO , March 23 , 2012 , not deleted . ]
The final point about litigation working is that , believe it or not , people ( including white people in red hats ) have rights , and those can be enforced through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 're suing Colorado Springs over their decision to shut down our conference , and suing PayPal for cancelling our account because we 've been called `` white nationalist '' .

It's just been reported that CNN has settled the lawsuit brought by the Covington Catholic schoolboys who were attacked by Black Hebrew protesters, a real Indian who was a phony veteran, the MSM including CNN, and...Conservatism, Inc.
See CNN settles $275M lawsuit with Covington Catholic student Nick Sandmann | Network accused in lawsuit of 'bullying' Kentucky teen, by Valerie Richardson, Washington Times, January 7, 2020.
You can also see it on CNN, reported by Oliver Darcy, if you consider that a credible source, but of course, the CNN corporation, which knows everything about the settlement, isn't telling its employee Darcy anything—"No other details were immediately available."
There are three things to remember about this.
1. Everything the media said about this proved to be wrong.
2. Conservatism, Inc, fell for it hook, line, and sinker, and
3. Litigation works. Even something the size of CNN can fold in the face of the American legal system.
On the first point, see Ann Coulter On Covington Catholic Lawsuit: Court To The WASHINGTON POST—Don’t Try Too Hard To Get It Right, Michelle Malkin: The Covington Rorschach Test, or Gateway Pundit's HUGE! MEDIA BACKTRACKS FROM LIES: AP Admits Students “Were Singing” with Phillips — CNN’s Tapper “Video Contradicts” Phillips’s Claims – NRO Removes Hit Piece.
On the second, see Cuckservatives Fall For Extremely Fake News About MAGA-Hat Wearing Schoolboys—Like They Always Fall For Anti-White Fake News
Here is weepy cuckservative Jay Nordlinger's original reaction:
He climbed down later, but, as noted by Gateway Pundit, National Review Online, had to delete not just Tweets, but an actual article, saying (archive link)
The Covington Students Might as Well Have Just Spit on the Cross
By Nicholas Frankovich January 20, 2019 2:55 AM It appears that most of the teenagers in this video are from a Catholic high school near Covington, Kentucky, across the Ohio River from Cincinnati. They mock a serious, frail-looking older man and gloat in their momentary role as Roman soldiers to his Christ. “Bullying” is a worn-out word and doesn’t convey the full extent of the evil on display here. For some of us, the gospel stories of Jesus’s passion and death are so familiar we no longer hear them. The evangelists are terse in their descriptions of the humiliations heaped on Jesus in the final hours before his crucifixion, the consummate humiliation. Read the accounts again or, if you’d rather not, watch the video. The human capacity for sadism is too great.[More]
The is absolutely mental, but the capacity of cuckservatives to believe evil of white people is nothing new, as we saw in the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman case, the Baltimore Riots, and the Ferguson Riots. The most obvious case was when Rich Lowry, who also fell for the Covington Catholic hoax, wrote about the Zimmerman/Martin case that “Al Sharpton is Right.” [NRO, March 23, 2012, not deleted.]
The final point about litigation working is that, believe it or not, people (including white people in red hats) have rights, and those can be enforced through the courts.
That's why we're suing Colorado Springs over their decision to shut down our conference, and suing PayPal for cancelling our account because we've been called "white nationalist."
Lawsuits work.


vdare--2020-01-07--Lifehacker Propaganda: "Buy Your White Kid a Black Doll"

The famous Brown vs. Board of Education decision reversed an earlier Supreme Court ruling on `` separate but equal '' racial accomodations allegedly without violating stare decisis , because of what they said was `` new evidence '' —black psychologist Kenneth Clark 's `` doll experiments '' in which black children preferred white dolls .
This is the kind of bogus psychologicla studiey that does n't replicate , and it was criticized as such at the time .
It 's been criticized more since .
Steve Sailer said in one article that and in another blog item said This was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked The Doll Test for Racial Self-Hate : Did It Ever Make Sense ?
in 2014 , but they 're allowed to question this because they 're black .
In a 21st century variation on this , Lifehacker author Meghan Moravcik Walbert , who is very white , wants to you to buy your white child a black doll .
Please buy your white kids some diverse dolls .
Buy them the Captain America action figure AND the Black Panther one .
Buy them a white Barbie , a black Ken and little @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with it .
White dolls aren ’ t just for white kids and black dolls aren ’ t just for black kids .
Let your kids see you tell them how beautiful that black Barbie is , how precious that black baby looks and affirm what a good job your child does in caring for them .
Bradley wrote her plea after witnessing a conversation between two women who were shopping for a child ’ s birthday gift , debating whether a certain baby doll represented a child of color and whether the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ birthday kid might object .
As Bradley wanted to suggest to them , “ If someone is going to be upset about receiving a black doll , that is not a home I want my child ( white or brown or black ) spending time in .
Instead of avoiding that interaction , let ’ s just go all in and see what we ’ re dealing with.
” Any child or mother who does n't want a black doll , shun them !
It turns out , by the way , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dolls , 65 years after Brown Vs. Board , and for similar reasons .
In light of the paucity of black dolls , it ’ s “ of the utmost importance for black children ” to have dolls that look like them , Garrett said .
Conversely , she argues because “ white standards are promoted as the norm , ” it ’ s important for white children to have dolls that represent different ethnicities , “ to promote cultural diversity and an awareness that we are all one race : human.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ diverse , but children of color still need to see themselves represented more .
Meanwhile , white children have long been surrounded by an abundance of white role models and white characters in books , movies and TV shows .
But one easy way to make their world a little more diverse is by increasing the diversity of their toys .
That explains why , if you 're supposed to buy black kids black dolls to avoid damaging their little self-esteems , this ( white ) woman is advising white mothers to buy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's because their self-esteems deserve to be damaged—they 're white .

The famous Brown vs. Board of Education decision reversed an earlier Supreme Court ruling on "separate but equal" racial accomodations allegedly without violating stare decisis, because of what they said was "new evidence"—black psychologist Kenneth Clark's "doll experiments" in which black children preferred white dolls.
This is the kind of bogus psychologial study that doesn't replicate, and it was criticized as such at the time. It's been criticized more since.
Steve Sailer said in one article that
and in another blog item said
"As you may recall, the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision hinged in surprising proportion on an experiment done by sociologist Kenneth Clark in which black children tended to choose to play with (store-bought) white dolls over (home-made) black dolls, demonstrating (according to the Supreme Court's fearless interpretation) that segregated schools damaged black self-esteem."
This was always a stupid idea—black website The Root asked, The Doll Test for Racial Self-Hate: Did It Ever Make Sense? in 2014, but they're allowed to question this because they're black.
In a 21st century variation on this, Lifehacker author Meghan Moravcik Walbert, who is very white, wants to you to buy your white child a black doll.
...one woman, who is a foster and adoptive parent to children of different races and skin colors, would you like to stop before you buy your white child (or another white child) yet another fair-skinned doll. Maralee Bradley writes on her blog, A Musing Maralee:
Please buy your white kids some diverse dolls. Buy them the Captain America action figure AND the Black Panther one. Buy them a white Barbie, a black Ken and little brown-skinned, curly-haired Chelsea doll to go with it. White dolls aren’t just for white kids and black dolls aren’t just for black kids. Let your kids see you tell them how beautiful that black Barbie is, how precious that black baby looks and affirm what a good job your child does in caring for them.
Bradley wrote her plea after witnessing a conversation between two women who were shopping for a child’s birthday gift, debating whether a certain baby doll represented a child of color and whether the parents of the (presumably white) birthday kid might object. As Bradley wanted to suggest to them, “If someone is going to be upset about receiving a black doll, that is not a home I want my child (white or brown or black) spending time in. Instead of avoiding that interaction, let’s just go all in and see what we’re dealing with.” Buy Your White Kid a Black Doll, by Meghan Moravcik Walbert, Lifehacker Offspring, January 6, 2020
Any child or mother who doesn't want a black doll, shun them!
It turns out, by the way, that black children are still playing with white dolls, 65 years after Brown Vs. Board, and for similar reasons.
Children of color often play with white dolls simply because they are the most widely available. Debbie Garrett, author of Black Dolls: A Comprehensive Guide to Celebrating, Collecting, and Experiencing the Passion, told USA Today that she grew up in the South playing exclusively with white dolls. Store owners were either unwilling to carry black dolls or they were depicted in stereotypically racist ways.
In light of the paucity of black dolls, it’s “of the utmost importance for black children” to have dolls that look like them, Garrett said. Conversely, she argues because “white standards are promoted as the norm,” it’s important for white children to have dolls that represent different ethnicities, “to promote cultural diversity and an awareness that we are all one race: human.”
Toy options are starting to become more diverse, but children of color still need to see themselves represented more. Meanwhile, white children have long been surrounded by an abundance of white role models and white characters in books, movies and TV shows. But one easy way to make their world a little more diverse is by increasing the diversity of their toys.
That explains why, if you're supposed to buy black kids black dolls to avoid damaging their little self-esteems, this (white) woman is advising white mothers to buy their white kids black dolls. It's because their self-esteems deserve to be damaged—they're white.