iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-30--The Meaningless Meaning of “(COVID)-Cases”

“ Most interesting , at least in my mind is that “ evidence of pneumonia ” – by this definition alone ( see below ) — now qualifies as a clinical evidence of COVID-19 ‘ infection.
’ ” – Dr. Klaus L.E .
Kaiser COVID-19 here and COVID-19 there .
Each day , we ’ re bombarded ( I ’ d say ad nauseam ) with reports & news of more COVID-19 “ cases , ” whatever that term means .
You ’ d think that this term would be well defined , here , there and everywhere .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , generally accepted definition of it .
If you succeed , please let me know .
But , don ’ t despair , there ’ s a cure for it .
Big Pharma is “ on the case.
” • First , let ’ s see how Wikipedia defines it : Searching Wikipedia for the definition of “ case , ” at https : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case ( accessed on Dec. 29 , 2020 , 6:21 pm EST ) in this context .
I could not find any reference to COVID-19 , or any other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” – none at all !
• The CDC ( U.S. Centers for Decease Control and Prevention ) ; again just searching for a definition of the term “ case ” provides only such for Listeriosis : https : //wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/listeriosis/case-definition/2019/ ) .
No mention of COVID-19 – none at all .
• Undeterred , further checking found a CDC definition , dating back to April , 2020 , ( https : //wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/case-definition/2020/ ) answering my quest .
There , it states , under the Headlines ( also accessed on Dec. 29 , 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at least in my mind is that “ evidence of pneumonia ” – by this definition alone — now qualifies as a clinical evidence of COVID-19 “ infection.
” Clearly , several decades ago now , I must already have had contracted “ COVID-19 ” already .
At that time I felt pretty lousy and went to see our GP physician whose diagnosis of my condition was “ pneumonia.
” His advice then was : “ Rest up and drink lots of fluids and in a few days you ’ ll be fine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prescribed fluids on hand and following the good doctor ’ s advice , after a few days of rest I was eager and ready to go back to work .
And I had just thought of it then as a “ case ” of the common seasonal flu !
That truly begs the question : What differentiates the “ common flu ” from “ COVID-19 ?
” As far as I can reckon , the answer to that question is hard to come by .
Both the “ flu ” and COVID-19 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” ( polymerase-chain-reaction test ) , appear to test for similar or , perhaps even identical , biological fragments in one ’ s body .
What ’ s of interesting significance in that regard is also a recent report in the journal Nature that states , inter alia , “ In May [ 2020 ] , at the tail end of the first wave of COVID-19 deaths in many nations , and when some of the strictest lockdowns were in place , health workers noted an abrupt and early halt to the 2019–20 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Of course , such trivia is not welcome by the purveyors of the many millions of vaccine doses against this novel covidian type of the coronavirus variety .
Nor is it welcome by progress-minded folks at the World Health Organization and their prime disciples ( Drs .
Tedros , Fauci , Tam , etc . )
, nor by the movers and shakers ( attendance by invitation only ) at the World Economic Forum , nor the pharmaceutical giants which may reap great profits from their vaccine products , nor from government entities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but are , nevertheless , just turning into fear-mongering ping-pong balls of the afore-mentioned .
For another opinion along this line of thought , A. Firstenberg summarized that in a recent post with the title “ The Wrong Pandemic.
” With that in mind , please accept my Best Wishes for You and Yours for 2021 !
Dr. Klaus L.E .
Kaiser is a professional scientist with a Ph.D. in chemistry from the Technical University , Munich , Germany .
He has worked as a research scientist and project chief at Environment Canada @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for over 30 years and is currently Director of Research at TerraBase Inc .
He is author of nearly 300 publications in scientific journals , government and agency reports , books , computer programs , trade magazines , and newspaper articles .
Dr. Kaiser has been president of the International Association for Great Lakes Research , a peer reviewer of numerous scientific papers for several journals , Editor-in-Chief of the Water Quality Research Journal of Canada for nearly a decade , and an adjunct professor .
He has contributed to a variety of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many presentations at national and international conferences .
Dr. Kaiser is author of CONVENIENT MYTHS , the green revolution – perceptions , politics , and facts convenientmyths.com Dr. Kaiser can be reached at : mail @ convenientmyths The post The Meaningless Meaning of “ ( COVID ) -Cases ” appeared first on Ice Age Now .

“Most interesting, at least in my mind is that “evidence of pneumonia” – by this definition alone (see below) — now qualifies as a clinical evidence of COVID-19 ‘infection.’”
– Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser
_______
The Meaningless Meaning of “(COVID)-Cases”
Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser
COVID-19 here and COVID-19 there.
Each day, we’re bombarded (I’d say ad nauseam) with reports & news of more COVID-19 “cases,” whatever that term means.
You’d think that this term would be well defined, here, there and everywhere. I wish you luck in finding a standard, generally accepted definition of it. If you succeed, please let me know.
But, don’t despair, there’s a cure for it. Big Pharma is “on the case.”
Some Definitions of “Cases”
First, let’s see how Wikipedia defines it: Searching Wikipedia for the definition of “case,” at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case (accessed on Dec. 29, 2020, 6:21 pm EST) in this context. I could not find any reference to COVID-19, or any other medical meaning of the term “case” – none at all!
The CDC (U.S. Centers for Decease Control and Prevention); again just searching for a definition of the term “case” provides only such for Listeriosis: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/listeriosis/case-definition/2019/ ). No mention of COVID-19 – none at all.
Undeterred, further checking found a CDC definition, dating back to April, 2020, (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/case-definition/2020/ ) answering my quest. There, it states, under the Headlines (also accessed on Dec. 29, 2020) as follows :
“Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020”:
Most interesting, at least in my mind is that “evidence of pneumonia” – by this definition alone — now qualifies as a clinical evidence of COVID-19 “infection.”
Clearly, several decades ago now, I must already have had contracted “COVID-19” already. At that time I felt pretty lousy and went to see our GP physician whose diagnosis of my condition was “pneumonia.” His advice then was: “Rest up and drink lots of fluids and in a few days you’ll be fine again.”
Indeed, having plenty of prescribed fluids on hand and following the good doctor’s advice, after a few days of rest I was eager and ready to go back to work.
And I had just thought of it then as a “case” of the common seasonal flu!
That truly begs the question:
What differentiates the “common flu” from “COVID-19?”
As far as I can reckon, the answer to that question is hard to come by.
Both the “flu” and COVID-19,” diagnosed via the unspecific “PCR” (polymerase-chain-reaction test), appear to test for similar or, perhaps even identical, biological fragments in one’s body.
What’s of interesting significance in that regard is also a recent report in the journal Nature that states, inter alia,
“In May [2020], at the tail end of the first wave of COVID-19 deaths in many nations, and when some of the strictest lockdowns were in place, health workers noted an abrupt and early halt to the 2019–20 flu season in the Northern Hemisphere.”
Of course, such trivia is not welcome by the purveyors of the many millions of vaccine doses against this novel covidian type of the coronavirus variety. Nor is it welcome by progress-minded folks at the World Health Organization and their prime disciples (Drs. Tedros, Fauci, Tam, etc.), nor by the movers and shakers (attendance by invitation only) at the World Economic Forum, nor the pharmaceutical giants which may reap great profits from their vaccine products, nor from government entities that may have the best in mind but are, nevertheless, just turning into fear-mongering ping-pong balls of the afore-mentioned.
For another opinion along this line of thought, A. Firstenberg summarized that in a recent post with the title “The Wrong Pandemic.”
With that in mind, please accept my
Best Wishes for You and Yours for 2021 !
_________________________
Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser is a professional scientist with a Ph.D. in chemistry from the Technical University, Munich, Germany. He has worked as a research scientist and project chief at Environment Canada‘s Canada Centre for Inland Waters for over 30 years and is currently Director of Research at TerraBase Inc. He is author of nearly 300 publications in scientific journals, government and agency reports, books, computer programs, trade magazines, and newspaper articles.
Dr. Kaiser has been president of the International Association for Great Lakes Research, a peer reviewer of numerous scientific papers for several journals, Editor-in-Chief of the Water Quality Research Journal of Canada for nearly a decade, and an adjunct professor. He has contributed to a variety of scientific projects and reports and has made many presentations at national and international conferences.
Dr. Kaiser is author of CONVENIENT MYTHS, the green revolution – perceptions, politics, and facts
convenientmyths.com
Dr. Kaiser can be reached at: mail@convenientmyths
The post The Meaningless Meaning of “(COVID)-Cases” appeared first on Ice Age Now.
via Ice Age Now
https://ift.tt/2WYmbdW
December 30, 2020 at 04:31PM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-30--Coca-Cola tests positive for Covid-19

Coca-Cola tests positive for Covid-19

Austrian FPO lawmaker Michael Schnedlitz administered a COVID19 PCR test to a glass of Coca-Cola during a session of parliament @ @ @ @ @ , the soft drink tested positive for the coronavirus .
Thanks to Joe L for @ @ @ @ @ tests positive for Covid-19 appeared first on Ice Age Now .

Entire test captured on video.
Austrian FPO lawmaker Michael Schnedlitz administered a COVID19 PCR test to a glass of Coca-Cola during a session of parliament earlier this month.
Unfortunately, the soft drink tested positive for the coronavirus.
See more:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/austrian-lawmaker-tests-coca-cola-covid-infection-colleagues-drink-tests-positive/
Thanks to Joe L for this link
The post Coca-Cola tests positive for Covid-19 appeared first on Ice Age Now.
via Ice Age Now
https://ift.tt/3py8Rt1
December 30, 2020 at 04:09PM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-30--Record Daily Snowfall – Grand Isle Michigan

In addition , Grand Isle shattered the 30- year averages for both December snowfall and yearly snowfall .
It was @ @ @ @ @ Island on that date at 3.8 inches breaking the previous record of 3.5 inches set @ @ @ @ @ proven to be a snowy month .
With yesterday ’ s snowfall , Grand Island @ @ @ @ @ the month of December , almost triple the 30-year average is 4.8 inches of snow @ @ @ @ @ comes to snowfall for the entire year , Grand Island has had 13.5 inches of @ @ @ @ @ , handily surpassing the 30-year average yearly snowfall of 9 inches .
Thanks to Clay @ @ @ @ @ post Record Daily Snowfall – Grand Isle Michigan appeared first on Ice Age Now .

In addition, Grand Isle shattered the 30- year averages for both December snowfall and yearly snowfall.
A year-end snowstorm blanketed Grand Island and central Nebraska yesterday.
It was a record snowfall for Grand Island on that date at 3.8 inches breaking the previous record of 3.5 inches set in 1936.
December has proven to be a snowy month.
With yesterday’s snowfall, Grand Island has received 12 inches during the month of December, almost triple the 30-year average is 4.8 inches of snow in December.
When it comes to snowfall for the entire year, Grand Island has had 13.5 inches of snow so far this year, handily surpassing the 30-year average yearly snowfall of 9 inches.
https://theindependent.com/news/local/record-snowfall-blankets-g-i-hastings/article_762766 12-4a62-11eb-a633-bf579da753b7.html
Thanks to Clay Olson for this link
The post Record Daily Snowfall – Grand Isle Michigan appeared first on Ice Age Now.
via Ice Age Now
https://ift.tt/38OQaKF
December 30, 2020 at 03:55PM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-30--Doggerland: How did the Atlantis of the North Sea sink?

This seems semi-topical on the day Britain signs off on its new deal with the EU countries .
Going back into history , but not all that far back , the river Thames flowed into the Rhine .
North Sea trawlers still find bones of mammoths and other such fossils in their nets today .
– – – For a long time , scientists believed that a powerful tsunami destroyed Doggerland 8,200 years ago , says DW.com .
Sediment analysis now suggests that the land once connecting Great Britain with the rest of Europe had a later demise .
Around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the last ice age , the sea level in northern Europe was still about 60 meters ( 197 feet ) below what it is today .
The British Isles and the European mainland formed a continuous landmass .
Relatively large rivers crossed this landmass , but in a different way than we know today .
The Elbe , for example , flowed into a large inland lake .
The Rhine flowed from east to west over long distances .
Before it reached the sea at the latitude of Brittany , the Thames @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sea is today , there were fertile meadows and forests through which hunter-gatherers roamed .
The coast ran about 300 kilometers ( 186 miles ) further north along an area of about 30,000 square kilometers ( 11,580 square miles ) that received the name of “ Doggerland ” in the 1990s , called after a sandbank now located in the region .
We do not yet know much about life on this sunken tract of land .
Every now and then , fishermen have found mammoth teeth and bones of now-extinct land animals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nets .

This seems semi-topical on the day Britain signs off on its new deal with the EU countries. Going back into history, but not all that far back, the river Thames flowed into the Rhine. North Sea trawlers still find bones of mammoths and other such fossils in their nets today.
– – –
For a long time, scientists believed that a powerful tsunami destroyed Doggerland 8,200 years ago, says DW.com.
Sediment analysis now suggests that the land once connecting Great Britain with the rest of Europe had a later demise.
Around 10,000 years ago, at the end of the last ice age, the sea level in northern Europe was still about 60 meters (197 feet) below what it is today.
The British Isles and the European mainland formed a continuous landmass.
Relatively large rivers crossed this landmass, but in a different way than we know today.
The Elbe, for example, flowed into a large inland lake. The Rhine flowed from east to west over long distances. Before it reached the sea at the latitude of Brittany, the Thames flowed into it.
Where the North Sea is today, there were fertile meadows and forests through which hunter-gatherers roamed.
The coast ran about 300 kilometers (186 miles) further north along an area of about 30,000 square kilometers (11,580 square miles) that received the name of “Doggerland” in the 1990s, called after a sandbank now located in the region.
First finds in nets
We do not yet know much about life on this sunken tract of land. Every now and then, fishermen have found mammoth teeth and bones of now-extinct land animals, such as aurochs, in their nets.
Continued here.
via Tallbloke’s Talkshop
https://ift.tt/2WUnWZF
December 30, 2020 at 01:15PM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-30--A New Year’s Look At WUWT

A New Year’s Look At WUWT

Today , as the result of a series of wrong turns and bad choices , I ended up at the Wikipedia entry for Watts Up With That .
It says : Watts Up With That ?
( WUWT ) is a blog promoting climate change denial that was created by Anthony Watts in 2006 .
The blog predominantly discusses climate issues with a focus on anthropogenic climate change , generally accommodating beliefs that are in opposition to the scientific consensus on climate change .
Appalled by the misrepresentations in that , I thought I might comment on them .
First @ @ @ @ @ @ @ promote climate change denial ” .
I always laugh when I read about “ denial ” because none of the authors of such nonsense ever get around to telling us exactly what we ’ re supposed to be “ denying ” .
Me , I deny nothing .
I disagree with some of the revealed wisdom of those who believe in “ consensus science ” but that ’ s a very different thing .
And for those who would like a full explanation of why “ consensus ” has nothing to do with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paper entitled Aliens Cause Global Warming .
The real misunderstanding , however , is that WUWT doesn ’ t “ promote ” anything .
Instead , it serves a very different purpose .
Let me explain what WUWT really is , which will require a bit of a digression .
But then if you know me , you ’ ll know that I ’ m susceptible to being sidetractored … Many , perhaps most people don ’ t understand what science is .
Some say they rely on “ the science ” , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Others think that science is a subject .
Some believe that a scientific “ consensus ” establishes truth .
In fact , science is a process , not a subject .
And it is a most curious process , one that has brought infinite good to the world .
The process works as follows : • Someone comes up up with an idea about how the world works .
• They publish their results in some public forum , along with all of the facts , logic , references , mathematics , and/or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their idea .
• Then other people try to poke holes in their facts , logic , references , etc .
• If they are successful in that process , then the idea goes down in flames .
• If nobody can find any errors in what they ’ ve done , then their idea is provisionally accepted as being valid .
• The reason the acceptance is “ provisional ” is that at some time in the future , someone may find something wrong with the idea .
Now , there are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ process we call “ science ” • It doesn ’ t matter who came up with the idea .
Either it is valid or it is demonstrably incorrect .
• The education level of the person who came up with the idea is also immaterial .
The only valid question is whether they are right or wrong .
• Similarly , it doesn ’ t matter who poked holes in the idea .
• The education level of the person who poked holes in the idea is also immaterial .
The only valid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exact problem ( s ) with the idea .
• The system only works when there is transparency and access to the facts , logic , etc .
If other people can ’ t see what the person has done , how can they possibly determine if it ’ s valid ?
• The system is totally adversarial .
If I can show that the central idea in someone ’ s entire lifetime of work is incorrect , they will not be happy with me … my saying about this is , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So we should not be surprised if passions run high .
• The more people who try to poke holes in the claims , and the better they understand the subject , the better the system works .
Now , historically there were no “ scientific journals ” .
New scientific ideas were circulated hand-to-hand or mailed between people who knew each other .
But the process described above was how they judged the ideas .
If someone could show the idea was wrong , it would be discarded .
Then along came @ @ @ @ @ @ @ started earlier , but they only became prevalent in the 20th century .
Same idea .
But they use “ peer reviewers ” to secretly judge the validity of the ideas .
And as you might imagine … this system is highly slanted towards whatever is currently believed .
People whose continued employment depends on some idea being correct will only very rarely be honest enough to say that a new idea is worth publishing if that new idea will cost them their job … Finally , in modern times , in some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the original , pre-peer-review method .
And THAT is what WUWT is .
It ’ s not a place that only publishes things that are 100 % validated .
There ’ s little point in that .
Instead , it is a place to expose new scientific ideas to the harsh glare of widespread publicity in the crowded public marketplace of new ideas .
People say “ But WUWT publishes some things that are obviously false ” , as though that were a bad thing .
That ’ s true , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It is a good and necessary thing .
The more that incorrect ideas get exposed to critical review , the sooner they will be shown to be incorrect .
And inter alia , this is why I love writing for WUWT .
If my work contains errors , they rarely last more than a couple of hours before someone points them out .
This is infinitely valuable to me , as it keeps me from wasting months haring down a blind alley .
It is also a place where I can publicly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ poke holes in them .
As mentioned above , science is adversarial , and to make that work , the person who came up with the idea needs to be able to defend it , rather than have it censored by what I call “ pal review ” .
There ’ s a description of one of my interactions with the peer-review system in my post called “ Michael Mann , Smooth Operator “ .
Next , compared with WUWT , the peer-review process is infinitely slow .
On WUWT I can think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and see it published by the afternoon , and then totally demolished the next day , not six months later .
And this is good because I ’ m not interested in being famous or garnering citations .
I ’ m interested in having an effect on the ongoing discussion of climate science , and for that my ideas need to be current .
Next , unlike my ideas being shot down by a few peer-reviewers with a large investment in defending the consensus ideas , there are literally thousands of people out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prove me wrong .
Heck , there are whole websites that do little else but tell people what a jerk I am .
Having this many adversaries provides a far more rigorous , skeptical , public , and fair peer-review than having say three people with fixed ideas on the subject censor my ideas in secret .
To summarize , WUWT is not a blog for “ promoting ” anything , as Wiki falsely claims .
And it is assuredly not a blog that only publishes just what is “ correct ” or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is a place where scientific ideas of all kinds can be most critically examined and publicly peer-reviewed in a modern , efficient manner .
And curiously , it is one of the few places in the world where this is true .
Finally , in that regard let me say that without Anthony Watts , Charles The Moderator , and the various moderators around the world , none of this would be possible .
My thanks to the whole crew—WUWT is a huge contribution to the testing of new scientific ideas .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ m going for a walk in the sunshine with my gorgeous ex-fiancee , my delightful wife of forty years .
My best to everyone , and wishes for the finest of new years .

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
Today, as the result of a series of wrong turns and bad choices, I ended up at the Wikipedia entry for Watts Up With That. It says:
Watts Up With That? (WUWT) is a blog promoting climate change denial that was created by Anthony Watts in 2006. The blog predominantly discusses climate issues with a focus on anthropogenic climate change, generally accommodating beliefs that are in opposition to the scientific consensus on climate change.
Appalled by the misrepresentations in that, I thought I might comment on them.
First, the blog doesn’t “promote climate change denial”. I always laugh when I read about “denial” because none of the authors of such nonsense ever get around to telling us exactly what we’re supposed to be “denying”. Me, I deny nothing. I disagree with some of the revealed wisdom of those who believe in “consensus science” but that’s a very different thing. And for those who would like a full explanation of why “consensus” has nothing to do with science, let me recommend a wonderful paper entitled Aliens Cause Global Warming.
The real misunderstanding, however, is that WUWT doesn’t “promote” anything. Instead, it serves a very different purpose. Let me explain what WUWT really is, which will require a bit of a digression. But then if you know me, you’ll know that I’m susceptible to being sidetractored …
Many, perhaps most people don’t understand what science is. Some say they rely on “the science”, as if such a thing existed. Others think that science is a subject. Some believe that a scientific “consensus” establishes truth.
In fact, science is a process, not a subject. And it is a most curious process, one that has brought infinite good to the world. The process works as follows:
Someone comes up up with an idea about how the world works.
They publish their results in some public forum, along with all of the facts, logic, references, mathematics, and/or computer code that they think will support their idea.
Then other people try to poke holes in their facts, logic, references, etc.
If they are successful in that process, then the idea goes down in flames.
If nobody can find any errors in what they’ve done, then their idea is provisionally accepted as being valid.
The reason the acceptance is “provisional” is that at some time in the future, someone may find something wrong with the idea.
Now, there are several import things to note about this process we call “science”
It doesn’t matter who came up with the idea. Either it is valid or it is demonstrably incorrect.
The education level of the person who came up with the idea is also immaterial. The only valid question is whether they are right or wrong.
Similarly, it doesn’t matter who poked holes in the idea.
The education level of the person who poked holes in the idea is also immaterial. The only valid question is whether they can show the exact problem(s) with the idea.
The system only works when there is transparency and access to the facts, logic, etc. If other people can’t see what the person has done, how can they possibly determine if it’s valid?
The system is totally adversarial. If I can show that the central idea in someone’s entire lifetime of work is incorrect, they will not be happy with me … my saying about this is, “Science is a blood sport”. So we should not be surprised if passions run high.
The more people who try to poke holes in the claims, and the better they understand the subject, the better the system works.
Now, historically there were no “scientific journals”. New scientific ideas were circulated hand-to-hand or mailed between people who knew each other. But the process described above was how they judged the ideas. If someone could show the idea was wrong, it would be discarded.
Then along came the scientific journals. Historically, they started earlier, but they only became prevalent in the 20th century. Same idea. But they use “peer reviewers” to secretly judge the validity of the ideas.
And as you might imagine … this system is highly slanted towards whatever is currently believed. People whose continued employment depends on some idea being correct will only very rarely be honest enough to say that a new idea is worth publishing if that new idea will cost them their job …
Finally, in modern times, in some cases, we’ve gone back to the original, pre-peer-review method. And THAT is what WUWT is. It’s not a place that only publishes things that are 100% validated. There’s little point in that.
Instead, it is a place to expose new scientific ideas to the harsh glare of widespread publicity in the crowded public marketplace of new ideas.
People say “But WUWT publishes some things that are obviously false”, as though that were a bad thing.
That’s true, and it’s not a bad thing. It is a good and necessary thing. The more that incorrect ideas get exposed to critical review, the sooner they will be shown to be incorrect.
And inter alia, this is why I love writing for WUWT. If my work contains errors, they rarely last more than a couple of hours before someone points them out. This is infinitely valuable to me, as it keeps me from wasting months haring down a blind alley.
It is also a place where I can publicly defend my ideas against people trying to poke holes in them. As mentioned above, science is adversarial, and to make that work, the person who came up with the idea needs to be able to defend it, rather than have it censored by what I call “pal review”. There’s a description of one of my interactions with the peer-review system in my post called “Michael Mann, Smooth Operator“.
Next, compared with WUWT, the peer-review process is infinitely slow. On WUWT I can think of a new idea in the morning and see it published by the afternoon, and then totally demolished the next day, not six months later. And this is good because I’m not interested in being famous or garnering citations. I’m interested in having an effect on the ongoing discussion of climate science, and for that my ideas need to be current.
Next, unlike my ideas being shot down by a few peer-reviewers with a large investment in defending the consensus ideas, there are literally thousands of people out their who would like very much to prove me wrong. Heck, there are whole websites that do little else but tell people what a jerk I am. Having this many adversaries provides a far more rigorous, skeptical, public, and fair peer-review than having say three people with fixed ideas on the subject censor my ideas in secret.
(In passing, I am happy that there are websites that spend much of their time dissing my ideas, or me personally. They’ve obviously never heard the old Hollywood axiom that “All publicity is good publicity.” In my case, what looks like bad publicity is actually good because when people read that my ideas are wrong, wrong, wrong … well, a certain percentage of them will wonder why the folks on that site are so opposed to me, and they’ll come here and read what I actually wrote. So they’re just driving traffic to WUWT in general and to my work in particular. What’s not to like?)
To summarize, WUWT is not a blog for “promoting” anything, as Wiki falsely claims. And it is assuredly not a blog that only publishes just what is “correct” or just what skeptics say.
Instead, it is a place where scientific ideas of all kinds can be most critically examined and publicly peer-reviewed in a modern, efficient manner. And curiously, it is one of the few places in the world where this is true.
Finally, in that regard let me say that without Anthony Watts, Charles The Moderator, and the various moderators around the world, none of this would be possible. My thanks to the whole crew—WUWT is a huge contribution to the testing of new scientific ideas.
And now? … now I’m going for a walk in the sunshine with my gorgeous ex-fiancee, my delightful wife of forty years.
My best to everyone, and wishes for the finest of new years.
w.
Like this: Like Loading…
Related


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-30--China is taking down USA from “within” says Patrick Byrne

It may seem like a leap to say China is actively sabotaging the US .
A more useful question might be to ask how much cheaper it is to pay off corrupt elites than to build a new aircraft carrier ?
Given that President Trump has stood up to President Xi and put an end to the rich game of trade deals , how much would it be worth to China to not only get rid of Trump ( and all future Trump-copies ) but also to stop free and fair elections in the US and to install a President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at stake , it appears to be a cheap strategy .
What if he ’ s right ?
“ The greatest way to fight a war is not to have to fight it at all .
Years ago Patrick Byrne hoped to bring the beautiful things from Chinese culture to the USA .
instead now he warns that Chinese scholars have studied the US and figured out that the greatest vulnerability is corruption , and now they ’ ve used that to infiltrate and stage a slow coup .
Byrne is not just @ @ @ @

It may seem like a leap to say China is actively sabotaging the US. A more useful question might be to ask how much cheaper it is to pay off corrupt elites than to build a new aircraft carrier? Given that President Trump has stood up to President Xi and put an end to the rich game of trade deals, how much would it be worth to China to not only get rid of Trump (and all future Trump-copies) but also to stop free and fair elections in the US and to install a President they could control?
Given the trillions at stake, it appears to be a cheap strategy. What if he’s right?
“The greatest way to fight a war is not to have to fight it at all.
Not firing a bullet….” — Patrick Byne speaking of Chinese philosophy.
Years ago Patrick Byrne hoped to bring the beautiful things from Chinese culture to the USA. instead now he warns that Chinese scholars have studied the US and figured out that the greatest vulnerability is corruption, and now they’ve used that to infiltrate and stage a slow coup.
Byrne is not just the […]
via JoNova
https://ift.tt/37XdRBt
December 30, 2020 at 10:59AM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-30--The Green New Deal Arrives In Colorado

The Green New Deal Arrives In Colorado

Thousands in Colorado without heat after vandals attack gas system Earth First !
Worldwide Temperatures in the region were below @ @ @ @ @ morning .
This terrorism is only temporary and will be corrected soon , but Joe @ @ @ @ @ … Continue reading →

Thousands in Colorado without heat after vandals attack gas system Earth First! Worldwide Temperatures in the region were below 0F (-18C) this morning. This terrorism is only temporary and will be corrected soon, but Joe Biden has promised to completely … Continue reading →
via Real Climate Science
https://ift.tt/3o2Ilrc
December 30, 2020 at 10:47AM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-30--World L eading Engine Expert: Combustion Engine Remains The Future, “Hydrogen Will Be Nada”

E-vehicles not practical , not affordable .
Future of e-mobility still “ wishful thinking ” .
In a very recent interview , Germany/Austria ’ s top automobile engine expert Prof. Dr. Fritz Indra says hydrogen fuel cars will amount to “ nada ” because of the high inefficiency and costs .
The same applies to e-vehicles .
The Austrian engineer also says German and European policymakers are making a big mistake by prescribing to the industry what drive technology to use .
“ They can give us the targets , but they have to leave it up to engineers to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ targets , and to build a car that is affordable to the buyer.
” Electric battery cars no match for the combustion engine Indra also says electric cars offer little to be desired , saying that although the efficiency from battery to transmission is high , no one is looking at what happens before the battery and after the transmission , which he calls “ an inexcusable error.
” In the assessment of battery powered vehicles , Indra describes the problems of range and battery disposal that still profoundly plague electric battery vehicles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , what has company Bosch done ?
Bosch , about one year ago , stopped research in the lithium ion battery .
That means they have backed out completely from the topic of batteries , ” says Indra .
“ That ’ s an unbelievable decision , because that ’ s a global company.
” Hydrogen as a fuel will not be feasible as well , Indra explains : “ On the subject of hydrogen cars , we have to look at Daimler , Mercedes , ” says Indra .
“ On the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way ahead .
[ … ] About half a year ago , Mercedes announced that it was getting out of hydrogen .
That means that as a way for mobility , they see no chance for it.
” According to the Austrian engine expert , hydrogen as a fuel for fuel cells is plagued by too many efficiencies and dangers , describing how a fueling station would need three stages of piston-type compressors to get the fuel into the car at the “ unimaginable ” 1000 bars of pressure – never mind the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A quarter to one third of the energy offered by hydrogen would be consumed just to pressurize the gas , Indra reminds .
Moreover , hydrogen refueling stations would need to be supplied by tankers transporting the highly explosive gas at 50 bars of pressure .
Indra notes , however , that the hydrogen technology may have a chance for use in cargo vehicles .
Indra also sees no chance for Germany playing an important role in the electric battery market , explaining that China has already secured all the raw materials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chile , and thus “ practically controls the market ” .
Germany will never ever be able to produce the lithium ion batteries at a cost like that in China .
Indra sharply criticizes claims that lithium batteries can be recycled : “ But for those who don ’ t know , the recycling of lithium is an unbelievably difficult and expensive process.
” He adds that electric cars also will also never be able to meet Europe ’ s recycling directives , which call for minimum 80 % of devices be recyclable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sums of money when it comes to subsidizing e-mobility .
“ It ’ s an absurdity to subsidize something that doesn ’ t make any contribution to climate protection , ” he says .
He sees China ’ s strategy of “ giving every technology a chance ” as the way to go , and to not become dogmatically stuck on one such as e-mobility , which he feels will never lead to an economic boost in Germany .
Indra sees a cleaner combustion engine with new fuels as the future , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this is not being supported by the German government .
“ A combustion engine car with synthetic fuel a is much cleaner and can be used much longer than electric cars , ” Indra says .
The retired engineering expert also says countries who have declared an end to the combustion engine are “ full of politics ” and predicts they will push off their targets , if not completely abandon them as reality hits .
In summary : the combustion engine will be around for a long time because it is cleaner @ @ @ @ @ @

E-vehicles not practical, not affordable. Future of e-mobility still “wishful thinking”.
In a very recent interview, Germany/Austria’s top automobile engine expert Prof. Dr. Fritz Indra says hydrogen fuel cars will amount to “nada” because of the high inefficiency and costs. The same applies to e-vehicles.
No to government engineering
The Austrian engineer also says German and European policymakers are making a big mistake by prescribing to the industry what drive technology to use. “They can give us the targets, but they have to leave it up to engineers to find out how to best reach the targets, and to build a car that is affordable to the buyer.”
Electric battery cars no match for the combustion engine
Indra also says electric cars offer little to be desired, saying that although the efficiency from battery to transmission is high, no one is looking at what happens before the battery and after the transmission, which he calls “an inexcusable error.” In the assessment of battery powered vehicles, Indra describes the problems of range and battery disposal that still profoundly plague electric battery vehicles.
Bosch backs out of lithium ion batteries
“When it comes to batteries, what has company Bosch done? Bosch, about one year ago, stopped research in the lithium ion battery. That means they have backed out completely from the topic of batteries,” says Indra. “That’s an unbelievable decision, because that’s a global company.”
Hydrogen as a fuel will not be feasible as well, Indra explains: “On the subject of hydrogen cars, we have to look at Daimler, Mercedes,” says Indra. “On the subject of hydrogen, Mercedes was always way ahead. […] About half a year ago, Mercedes announced that it was getting out of hydrogen. That means that as a way for mobility, they see no chance for it.”
Hydrogen fueling stations impractical
According to the Austrian engine expert, hydrogen as a fuel for fuel cells is plagued by too many efficiencies and dangers, describing how a fueling station would need three stages of piston-type compressors to get the fuel into the car at the “unimaginable” 1000 bars of pressure – never mind the technical obstacles building such a car poses.
A quarter to one third of the energy offered by hydrogen would be consumed just to pressurize the gas, Indra reminds.
Moreover, hydrogen refueling stations would need to be supplied by tankers transporting the highly explosive gas at 50 bars of pressure.
Indra notes, however, that the hydrogen technology may have a chance for use in cargo vehicles.
China controls the lithium raw material market
Indra also sees no chance for Germany playing an important role in the electric battery market, explaining that China has already secured all the raw materials, in countries such as Congo and Chile, and thus “practically controls the market”. Germany will never ever be able to produce the lithium ion batteries at a cost like that in China.
Recycling is very expensive
Indra sharply criticizes claims that lithium batteries can be recycled: “But for those who don’t know, the recycling of lithium is an unbelievably difficult and expensive process.”
He adds that electric cars also will also never be able to meet Europe’s recycling directives, which call for minimum 80% of devices be recyclable.
Indra thinks policymakers are blowing large sums of money when it comes to subsidizing e-mobility. “It’s an absurdity to subsidize something that doesn’t make any contribution to climate protection,” he says.
Combustion engine still the future
He sees China’s strategy of “giving every technology a chance” as the way to go, and to not become dogmatically stuck on one such as e-mobility, which he feels will never lead to an economic boost in Germany.
Indra sees a cleaner combustion engine with new fuels as the future, and finds it’s a pity that this is not being supported by the German government.
“A combustion engine car with synthetic fuel a is much cleaner and can be used much longer than electric cars,” Indra says. The retired engineering expert also says countries who have declared an end to the combustion engine are “full of politics” and predicts they will push off their targets, if not completely abandon them as reality hits.
In summary: the combustion engine will be around for a long time because it is cleaner, extremely practical and affordable.
Donate – choose an amount
via NoTricksZone
https://ift.tt/2KMQEJs
December 30, 2020 at 09:29AM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-31--Global Hurricane Activity Below Average In 2020

As the year draws to a close , we can note that , despite a busy Atlantic hurricane season , @ @ @ @ @ been well below average : And in the US , tornado activity has also been @ @ @ @ @ provisional data : What is particularly notable is that again there have been no EF-5 @ @ @ @ @ are the most powerful category , and it is now more than 7 years since @ @ @ @ @ County , Oklahoma in May 2013 .
Since 1970 there has been a total of @ @ @ @ @ 14 occurred in the 1970s : via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood
As the year draws to a close, we can note that, despite a busy Atlantic hurricane season, global hurricane activity has actually been well below average:
http://climatlas.com/tropical/
And in the US, tornado activity has also been below average, according to provisional data:
https://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/#data
What is particularly notable is that again there have been no EF-5 tornadoes this year. EF-5s are the most powerful category, and it is now more than 7 years since the last one hit Moore County, Oklahoma in May 2013.
Since 1970 there has been a total of 36 EF-5s, of which 14 occurred in the 1970s:
https://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/#data
via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
https://ift.tt/34WcS2k
December 31, 2020 at 05:42AM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-31--Which of These is 2020’s Greatest “Crime against Humanity”

For the purpose of this Statute , ‘ crime against humanity ’ means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population , with knowledge of the attack [ emphasis mine ] .
The acts in themselves include many crimes including murder , enslavement , enforced disappearance , etc .
and also “ other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering , or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.
” In contrast with genocide , crimes against humanity do not need to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the victim of the attack can be any civilian population , regardless of its affiliation or identity .
Systemic crimes by communist regimes , such as the Holodomor ( the famine manufactured by the Soviets in Ukraine ) and the Great Leap Forward ( Chairman Mao ’ s “ reconstruction ” that killed 45 million ) have been described as “ crimes against humanity.
” Human beings are organisms capable of directing themselves , governing and even manufacturing , their emotions .
They can also modify , physiologically , the very source of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brain ) with purpose and practice ( neuroplasticity ) .
This self-directedness ( autonomy ) , is a primal source of joy , creativity , and productivity .
It does not follow that we must each secure knowledge in every field from cooking to medicine to virology .
In a world full of specialization , we can decide to follow experts we choose to trust .
In a free-speech world , we may make errors in seeking and following experts that turn out to be wrong , but reality promptly corrects wrongheaded science @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mind-criminals , never goes backward .
It ’ s thus a “ crime against humanity ” to force humans to act against their better judgment , to coerce them into accepting the rule of “ wise men.
” It ’ s even worse to hoodwink them into thinking that the unbiased counsel of experts is freely available to citizens via governments , and by those who have assumed the responsibility of holding governments to account ( the media ) .
So deceived , humanity , willingly but unknowingly , acts against its own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the reader , that there is no greater moral crime than this deception .
The Year 2020 ’ s Most Egregious Crimes against Humanity Our foundation laid , we are now in a position to call out the worst abuses of this calendar year .
A caveat , here .
Much of this foundation was laid across several essays that were published on Savvy Street through 2020 , and like the paragraph on autonomy above , are summaries of longer arguments .
Hyperlinks are provided for those who wish to dig deeper .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Destroyed Property , and Burned Livestock The year 2020 erupted with monstrous bushfires in Australia .
The bulk of these , it was determined , did not have a natural cause such as lightning strikes ( for which advanced meteorology keeps an accurate tab on locations and timing ) , but arson .
By the end of the northern summer , the western United States , too , was engulfed by record-breaking but preventable mega fires that claimed or destroyed human lives and other species .
As children and their grandmothers were burned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ narrative of the primary cause being “ climate change.
” 2 .
Was It Criminal Negligence or Design ?
China and the Virus Dr. Li-Meng Yan , a Chinese virologist , was involved in investigating the first reported outbreak of COVID-19 in the world in Wuhan .
In April 2020 , she fled China and came to the U.S. , where she sought refuge .
She later claimed , on several U.S. channels including Fox News that the COVID-19 virus was engineered in a lab—that the genome fingerprint reveals a manufacture— “ a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a rabbit ’ s ears , and a monkey ’ s hands can not arise in nature [ minute 2.30 to 2.40 ] ; ” that the wet market origination story was a smokescreen .
Dr. Lan also asserted that the World Health Organisation ( WHO ) was complicit , courtesy China ’ s intrusive domination of many developing countries via strategic lending ( the Belt and Road Initiative ) and its subversive machinations .
Dr. Lan ’ s claims may be false .
But they are being suppressed by mass media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Google raises only the dismissals to the top of its search engine ; its algorithms , it appears , are designed to promulgate the establishment narrative .
Even if the virus was lab engineered , its escape into the world may have resulted from negligence rather than intent .
But , at the very least , in the initial phase of the pandemic , China actively suppressed information that could have saved countless lives—this is not disputed .
That suppression of vital information alone marks it as a morally heinous crime .
3.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Agencies ’ Crime against Humanity What if the virus arose in nature and escaped China inadvertently ?
The public health agencies are not exonerated by that hypothesis .
Early in 2020 , there were plenty of signs of asymptomatic carry and a cure as the immune system overcame the virus , and also evidence that certain treatments , if given in the initial stages of the disease , were extremely effective .
But health agencies actively pooh-poohed studies of antibody testing and refused to engage on the cardinal numbers that really mattered .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ access to more funds and the agencies turned a blind eye .
Fraudulent studies that demonized HCQ were published in the world ’ s most prestigious medical journals .
4 .
The Enablers : Mass Media and Academe ’ s Capitulation Is a Crime The neo-Marxists long march through our institutions began nearly a century ago .
The critical capture was of academe , and then , media .
Economics was an easy prey once Keynes published his outlandish departure from logic .
The humanities were re-erected with “ grievance studies , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s shift away from objectivity toward leftist advocacy masquerading as journalism was predicated on the falsification provided by “ peer-reviewed ” journals , which , in the humanities , had become subtle advocates for unreason .
Restrained by the First Amendment in the U.S. , mass media used European regulation to strangle the multinational tech giants like Facebook , Twitter , and Google ( owner of YouTube ) .
Inventing pseudo-objective paradigms like “ fake news ” and “ hate speech , ” they succeeded in flooding the social media public square with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Rome Statute ’ s key criteria for labeling a wrong a “ crime against humanity ” : Intentionally causing great suffering , an attack that is widespread or systematic , and directed against any civilian population at large .
Which of these four , do you , the reader , believe to be the most egregiously heinous criminals against humanity of the year 2020 ?

From The Savvy Street.com
By Vinay Kolhatkar
Article 7 of the Rome Statute states:
For the purpose of this Statute, ‘crime against humanity’ means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack [emphasis mine].
The acts in themselves include many crimes including murder, enslavement, enforced disappearance, etc. and also “other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.”
The U.N. adds:
In contrast with genocide, crimes against humanity do not need to target a specific group. Instead, the victim of the attack can be any civilian population, regardless of its affiliation or identity.
Systemic crimes by communist regimes, such as the Holodomor (the famine manufactured by the Soviets in Ukraine) and the Great Leap Forward (Chairman Mao’s “reconstruction” that killed 45 million) have been described as “crimes against humanity.”
The Quintessential Nature of Humanity
Human beings are organisms capable of directing themselves, governing and even manufacturing, their emotions. They can also modify, physiologically, the very source of directedness and emotion (i.e., the brain) with purpose and practice (neuroplasticity).
This self-directedness (autonomy), is a primal source of joy, creativity, and productivity. It does not follow that we must each secure knowledge in every field from cooking to medicine to virology. In a world full of specialization, we can decide to follow experts we choose to trust. In a free-speech world, we may make errors in seeking and following experts that turn out to be wrong, but reality promptly corrects wrongheaded science. Science, when unhindered by willful mind-criminals, never goes backward.
It’s thus a “crime against humanity” to force humans to act against their better judgment, to coerce them into accepting the rule of “wise men.” It’s even worse to hoodwink them into thinking that the unbiased counsel of experts is freely available to citizens via governments, and by those who have assumed the responsibility of holding governments to account (the media). So deceived, humanity, willingly but unknowingly, acts against its own interest.
I submit to you, the reader, that there is no greater moral crime than this deception.
The Year 2020’s Most Egregious Crimes against Humanity
Our foundation laid, we are now in a position to call out the worst abuses of this calendar year.
A caveat, here. Much of this foundation was laid across several essays that were published on Savvy Street through 2020, and like the paragraph on autonomy above, are summaries of longer arguments. Hyperlinks are provided for those who wish to dig deeper.
1. Green Ideology Murdered People, Destroyed Property, and Burned Livestock
The year 2020 erupted with monstrous bushfires in Australia. The bulk of these, it was determined, did not have a natural cause such as lightning strikes (for which advanced meteorology keeps an accurate tab on locations and timing), but arson.
By the end of the northern summer, the western United States, too, was engulfed by record-breaking but preventable mega fires that claimed or destroyed human lives and other species. As children and their grandmothers were burned alive, mass media peddled the false narrative of the primary cause being “climate change.”
2. Was It Criminal Negligence or Design? China and the Virus
Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a Chinese virologist, was involved in investigating the first reported outbreak of COVID-19 in the world in Wuhan. In April 2020, she fled China and came to the U.S., where she sought refuge.
She later claimed, on several U.S. channels including Fox News that the COVID-19 virus was engineered in a lab—that the genome fingerprint reveals a manufacture—“a cow with a deer’s head, a rabbit’s ears, and a monkey’s hands cannot arise in nature [minute 2.30 to 2.40];” that the wet market origination story was a smokescreen. Dr. Lan also asserted that the World Health Organisation (WHO) was complicit, courtesy China’s intrusive domination of many developing countries via strategic lending (the Belt and Road Initiative) and its subversive machinations.
Dr. Lan’s claims may be false. But they are being suppressed by mass media despite other virologists making similar claims. Google raises only the dismissals to the top of its search engine; its algorithms, it appears, are designed to promulgate the establishment narrative.
Even if the virus was lab engineered, its escape into the world may have resulted from negligence rather than intent. But, at the very least, in the initial phase of the pandemic, China actively suppressed information that could have saved countless lives—this is not disputed. That suppression of vital information alone marks it as a morally heinous crime.
3. WHO, CDC, and Public Health Agencies’ Crime against Humanity
What if the virus arose in nature and escaped China inadvertently? The public health agencies are not exonerated by that hypothesis.
Early in 2020, there were plenty of signs of asymptomatic carry and a cure as the immune system overcame the virus, and also evidence that certain treatments, if given in the initial stages of the disease, were extremely effective.
But health agencies actively pooh-poohed studies of antibody testing and refused to engage on the cardinal numbers that really mattered. Hospitals inflated deaths by COVID to get access to more funds and the agencies turned a blind eye. Fraudulent studies that demonized HCQ were published in the world’s most prestigious medical journals.
4. The Enablers: Mass Media and Academe’s Capitulation Is a Crime
The neo-Marxists long march through our institutions began nearly a century ago. The critical capture was of academe, and then, media.
Economics was an easy prey once Keynes published his outlandish departure from logic. The humanities were re-erected with “grievance studies,” a scientific hoax. Mass media’s shift away from objectivity toward leftist advocacy masquerading as journalism was predicated on the falsification provided by “peer-reviewed” journals, which, in the humanities, had become subtle advocates for unreason.
Restrained by the First Amendment in the U.S., mass media used European regulation to strangle the multinational tech giants like Facebook, Twitter, and Google (owner of YouTube). Inventing pseudo-objective paradigms like “fake news” and “hate speech,” they succeeded in flooding the social media public square with neo-Marxist bias.
Let’s recall the Rome Statute’s key criteria for labeling a wrong a “crime against humanity”:
Intentionally causing great suffering, an attack that is widespread or systematic, and directed against any civilian population at large.
Which of these four, do you, the reader, believe to be the most egregiously heinous criminals against humanity of the year 2020?
Read More at: https://www.thesavvystreet.com/which-of-these-is-2020s-greatest-crime-against-humanity/
Like this: Like Loading…
Related


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-31--Go Native, Orders Prince Charles!

Go Native, Orders Prince Charles!

Says the man with four stately homes , and a carbon footprint of a small town !
Meanwhile he apparently expects the rest of us to live like a tribe of natives in the Amazonian jungle .
Maybe he could explain how the world could support billions of people in such a fashion .
The idea of a noble eco-savage is , in any event , a western inspired myth , as Robert Whelan explained in 1999 : Ever since the discovery of the New World by Christopher Columbus , the noble savage has been a potent symbol in Western @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a land where men and women live in simplicity and innocence has been used to draw unfavourable comparisons with advanced societies .
The noble savage has been conscripted by many causes , from the French Revolution to the sexual revolution , but in his most recent incarnation he is the champion of conservation .
The native peoples of the earth , according to this version of the legend , live in harmony with nature .
They respect the rest of creation .
They know how to harvest resources sustainably .
They are said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ environment .
However , we now know that native peoples can be as destructive to their environments as anyone else , and that historically aboriginal tribes often changed whole ecosystems by the repeated burning of forests and by hunting animal species to extinction .
The noble eco-savage is a white , Western artefact.When policy issues , such as land rights , are decided on the basis of this misconception , it leads to disappointment and sometimes recriminations against the tribal peoples who fail to conform to the stereotype .
via NOT A LOT @ @ @ @

By Paul Homewood
https://www.climatedepot.com/2020/12/30/prince-charles-we-can-learn-so-much-from-indigenous-communities-on-living-in-balance-with-the-natural-world-mother-nature-is-our-sustainer/
Says the man with four stately homes, and a carbon footprint of a small town!
Meanwhile he apparently expects the rest of us to live like a tribe of natives in the Amazonian jungle. Maybe he could explain how the world could support billions of people in such a fashion.
The idea of a noble eco-savage is, in any event, a western inspired myth, as Robert Whelan explained in 1999:
Ever since the discovery of the New World by Christopher Columbus, the noble savage has been a potent symbol in Western cultures. The notion that there is a land where men and women live in simplicity and innocence has been used to draw unfavourable comparisons with advanced societies. The noble savage has been conscripted by many causes, from the French Revolution to the sexual revolution, but in his most recent incarnation he is the champion of conservation. The native peoples of the earth, according to this version of the legend, live in harmony with nature. They respect the rest of creation. They know how to harvest resources sustainably. They are said to be ‘transparent’ in the environment. However, we now know that native peoples can be as destructive to their environments as anyone else, and that historically aboriginal tribes often changed whole ecosystems by the repeated burning of forests and by hunting animal species to extinction. The noble eco-savage is a white, Western artefact.When policy issues, such as land rights, are decided on the basis of this misconception, it leads to disappointment and sometimes recriminations against the tribal peoples who fail to conform to the stereotype.
https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Wild_in_Woods.html?id=SM5rmgEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
https://ift.tt/3aUYWJZ
December 31, 2020 at 04:18AM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-31--UK GOVERNMENT HIDES THE FULL COST OF DECARBONISING ELECTRICITY

This piece looks at the recently published energy white paper and finds the key detailed costings are missing .
The @ @ @ @ @ information to be made public .
How long will they fail to do so ?

This piece looks at the recently published energy white paper and finds the key detailed costings are missing. The GWPF are asking for the information to be made public. How long will they fail to do so?
via climate science
https://ift.tt/2KSwaii
December 31, 2020 at 02:00AM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-31--Georgia voting machines hacked live, and misprinted ballots in Republican area.

Georgia ’ s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections held a hearing to study Georgia ’ s Election .
Stanford Researcher @ @ @ @ @ U.S .
Patents , Jovan Pulitzer , Reveals Live , Real-Time Hacking of Dominion Voting @ @ @ @ @ Station .
Maybe this is why they won ’ t let us look at the @ @ @ @ @ misprinted in an area more likely to have Republican voters .
There are tiny changes @ @ @ @ @ printed ballots that would cause the machines to misread some votes .
Does the misaligning @ @ @ @ @ a shocking 93 % of ballots in Fulton county required adjudication ?
So 93 % @ @ @ @ @ were cast by the adjudicators , not the voters .
Where are those logs ?
@ @ @ @ @ need for paper ballots to be examined properly and just how much data they could @ @ @ @ @ the actual ballots .

Extraordinary evidence from Jovan Pulitzer
Georgia’s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections held a hearing to study Georgia’s Election. Stanford Researcher and Inventor with thousands of U.S. Patents, Jovan Pulitzer, Reveals Live, Real-Time Hacking of Dominion Voting Systems at Fulton County Polling Station.
Maybe this is why they won’t let us look at the physical ballots?
Ballots were misprinted in an area more likely to have Republican voters. There are tiny changes in the calibration marks of printed ballots that would cause the machines to misread some votes.
Does the misaligning of the calibration marks mean a shocking 93% of ballots in Fulton county required adjudication?
So 93% of votes in Fulton County were cast by the adjudicators, not the voters.
Where are those logs?
Watch Jovan Pulitzer discuss the need for paper ballots to be examined properly and just how much data they could get if they could see the actual ballots.
…
h/t PeterC, […]
via JoNova
https://ift.tt/37Z5llu
December 31, 2020 at 12:28AM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-31--The Middle East Doubles Down on Oil and Gas As the UN Warns of “Climate Emergency”

At the virtual “ Climate Ambition Summit ” co-hosted by the UN and UK and attended by over 70 world leaders on December 12th , Secretary-General António Guterres issued a stark warning : the world is facing a catastrophe ahead as it is on track to warm by more than 30 C by the end of the century “ unless all countries declare climate emergency ” .
He expressed disappointment at the summit that the G-20 countries are “ spending 50 % more in their stimulus and rescue packages on sectors linked to fossil fuel production and consumption than on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Secretary-General asked earnestly “ Can anybody still deny we are facing a dramatic emergency ” ?
The question poses the vast gulf between the policy positions of key Western governments and the oil and gas producers in the Middle East .
For the Middle East hydrocarbon producers hit by the ‘ double whammy ’ of sharply reduced oil and gas price – the mainstay of government revenues — and the impact of Covid-19 lockdowns on domestic economic activity , the strategy for national survival is clear and could not be more opposed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sharply increasing the pace of monetizing the oil and gas reserves that their countries are blessed with .
Middle East To Supply More Oil And Gas Within two weeks of the UN summit , Saudi Arabia ’ s energy minister announced on December 27th the discovery of four new oil and gas fields , including unconventional resources .
The discoveries will boost the country ’ s plans to increase its maximum sustained crude production capacity from the current 12 million b/d to 13 million b/d as well as developing its gas resources to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of burning it for power generation .
CEO Sultan Al Jaber of the ADNOC , one of the leading national oil companies in the Gulf region , said that the Abu Dhabi company is “ leaving no stone unturned in unblocking value from our abundant hydrocarbon resources ” .
In late 2019 , Abu Dhabi ’ s government approved $ 122 billion investment schedule for the next 5 years to raise its oil and gas production capacity .
With massive newly discovered reserves and the go-ahead to award major oil and gas exploration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increasing its oil production capacity to 5 million barrels/day ( b/d ) from its current 4 million b/d .
While The West Seeks To Do Without In contrast , the climate summit was an occasion for Prime Minister Boris Johnson to show leadership on climate policy in a warm-up act for next year ’ s global climate conference to be held in Glasgow and hosted by the UK .
Calling for a radical end to dependence on fossil fuels , the UK has previously announced a ban on new diesel and petrol cars @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emissions by a steep 68 % of 1990 levels by 2030 .
At the climate summit , Prime Minister Johnson pledged to end the financing of oil and gas projects overseas “ as soon as possible ” .
He also repeated his call for the UK to become “ the Saudi Arabia of the wind power generation ” , putting the nation ’ s “ foot to the accelerator in a carbon friendly way ” .
Policy makers of a number of Western countries that have announced ambitious zero-emission reduction goals by 2050 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crisis into an “ opportunity ” for a Green Industrial Revolution ( Boris Johnson ) and the Great Reset of global business ( Klaus Schwab , founder of the World Economic forum ) .
And we are promised that a Biden presidency around the corner will sign on to the ‘ net-zero by 2050 ’ pledge from day one of its taking office .
While policy elites in the West warn about the “ impending ” cataclysmic outcome of not reducing emissions , those of the rest of the world have been beset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in restoring growth and employment for their citizens hit by recessions amid a global pandemic .
Hydrocarbons constitute almost 85 % of global energy consumption , while renewable energy technologies such as wind , solar , modern biofuels and batteries are barely able to provide 5 % .
Can these renewable energy technologies provide the world with the energy that it needs in the foreseeable future ?
But That Oil and Gas Is Needed Despite the unprecedented demand collapse caused by the coronavirus pandemic since March and despite the endless stream of stories @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world faces a long term supply gap for oil and gas .
According to energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie , only about half the supply needed to 2040 is available from producing fields , “ the rest requires new capital investment ” .
Given the recent collapse in upstream oil and gas investments , the International Energy Forum in a recent report pointed out that if upstream investments in oil and gas exploration and production do not increase by 25 % annually over the next 3 years , we face a supply shock @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to IEF ’ s Secretary-General , “ Slashing investment in new production locks in lower total supply…it won ’ t be long before this lower supply collides with resurgent demand .
The result will be higher and more volatile oil prices and headwinds for the post-pandemic global economic recovery.
” Access to fossil fuels , available at scale , is the only known route to economic development .
Since the Industrial Revolution in the 18th and 19th centuries , no country on earth has developed without the use of readily accessible hydrocarbons .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Saudi Arabia of wind energy ” ( though there are plenty of doubters ) , but what the developing world , accounting for over three quarters of the world ’ s population , needs is for the real Saudi Arabia , along with other oil and gas producers , to be willing and able to supply fossil fuels as needed for human flourishing .

Reposted from Forbes
By Tilak Doshi
At the virtual “Climate Ambition Summit” co-hosted by the UN and UK and attended by over 70 world leaders on December 12th, Secretary-General António Guterres issued a stark warning: the world is facing a catastrophe ahead as it is on track to warm by more than 30 C by the end of the century “unless all countries declare climate emergency”. He expressed disappointment at the summit that the G-20 countries are “spending 50% more in their stimulus and rescue packages on sectors linked to fossil fuel production and consumption than on low carbon energy…This is unacceptable”.
The Secretary-General asked earnestly “Can anybody still deny we are facing a dramatic emergency”? The question poses the vast gulf between the policy positions of key Western governments and the oil and gas producers in the Middle East. For the Middle East hydrocarbon producers hit by the ‘double whammy’ of sharply reduced oil and gas price – the mainstay of government revenues — and the impact of Covid-19 lockdowns on domestic economic activity, the strategy for national survival is clear and could not be more opposed to the UN Secretary-General’s: sharply increasing the pace of monetizing the oil and gas reserves that their countries are blessed with.
Middle East To Supply More Oil And Gas
Within two weeks of the UN summit, Saudi Arabia’s energy minister announced on December 27th the discovery of four new oil and gas fields, including unconventional resources. The discoveries will boost the country’s plans to increase its maximum sustained crude production capacity from the current 12 million b/d to 13 million b/d as well as developing its gas resources to free up more oil for export instead of burning it for power generation.
CEO Sultan Al Jaber of the ADNOC, one of the leading national oil companies in the Gulf region, said that the Abu Dhabi company is “leaving no stone unturned in unblocking value from our abundant hydrocarbon resources”. In late 2019, Abu Dhabi’s government approved $122 billion investment schedule for the next 5 years to raise its oil and gas production capacity. With massive newly discovered reserves and the go-ahead to award major oil and gas exploration blocks, the country looks forward to increasing its oil production capacity to 5 million barrels/day (b/d) from its current 4 million b/d.
While The West Seeks To Do Without
In contrast, the climate summit was an occasion for Prime Minister Boris Johnson to show leadership on climate policy in a warm-up act for next year’s global climate conference to be held in Glasgow and hosted by the UK. Calling for a radical end to dependence on fossil fuels, the UK has previously announced a ban on new diesel and petrol cars by 2035 and a cut in carbon emissions by a steep 68% of 1990 levels by 2030. At the climate summit, Prime Minister Johnson pledged to end the financing of oil and gas projects overseas “as soon as possible”. He also repeated his call for the UK to become “the Saudi Arabia of the wind power generation”, putting the nation’s “foot to the accelerator in a carbon friendly way”.
Policy makers of a number of Western countries that have announced ambitious zero-emission reduction goals by 2050 have focused on converting the coronavirus pandemic crisis into an “opportunity” for a Green Industrial Revolution (Boris Johnson) and the Great Reset of global business (Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic forum). And we are promised that a Biden presidency around the corner will sign on to the ‘net-zero by 2050’ pledge from day one of its taking office.
While policy elites in the West warn about the “impending” cataclysmic outcome of not reducing emissions, those of the rest of the world have been beset by the need to make tough choices in restoring growth and employment for their citizens hit by recessions amid a global pandemic. Hydrocarbons constitute almost 85% of global energy consumption, while renewable energy technologies such as wind, solar, modern biofuels and batteries are barely able to provide 5%. Can these renewable energy technologies provide the world with the energy that it needs in the foreseeable future?
But That Oil and Gas Is Needed
Despite the unprecedented demand collapse caused by the coronavirus pandemic since March and despite the endless stream of stories about robust growth of renewable energy, the world faces a long term supply gap for oil and gas. According to energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie, only about half the supply needed to 2040 is available from producing fields, “the rest requires new capital investment”.
Given the recent collapse in upstream oil and gas investments, the International Energy Forum in a recent report pointed out that if upstream investments in oil and gas exploration and production do not increase by 25% annually over the next 3 years, we face a supply shock of “historic proportions”. According to IEF’s Secretary-General, “Slashing investment in new production locks in lower total supply…it won’t be long before this lower supply collides with resurgent demand. The result will be higher and more volatile oil prices and headwinds for the post-pandemic global economic recovery.”
Access to fossil fuels, available at scale, is the only known route to economic development. Since the Industrial Revolution in the 18th and 19th centuries, no country on earth has developed without the use of readily accessible hydrocarbons. The UK may well become the “Saudi Arabia of wind energy” (though there are plenty of doubters), but what the developing world, accounting for over three quarters of the world’s population, needs is for the real Saudi Arabia, along with other oil and gas producers, to be willing and able to supply fossil fuels as needed for human flourishing.
Like this: Like Loading…
Related


Thursday Open Thread

Please report issues with the updated site here .
Thanks !
0 out of 10 based on 0 rating

Please report issues with the updated site here. Thanks!
0 out of 10 based on 0 rating
via JoNova
https://ift.tt/3o4iMGb
December 30, 2020 at 09:02PM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-31--Greta Thunberg: “we are not listening to climate scientists”

According to Greta Thunberg we listened to scientific advice about Covid-19 , but for some reason we are ignoring advice from climate scientists and biodiversity specialists .
‘ We can not make it without science ’ : Greta Thunberg says climate experts are being ignored Climate specialists not being listened to despite Covid showing importance of following science , activist says In a joint interview with the author Margaret Atwood , broadcast on BBC Radio 4 on Tuesday as part of the two-times Booker prize-winning writer ’ s guest-editing of the Today programme .
Thunberg was asked if the pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appreciation of science would have an effect on climate information .
“ It could definitely have .
I think this pandemic has shone a light on how … we are depending on science and that we can not make it without science , ” Thunberg said .
“ But of course , we are only listening to one type of scientist , or some types of scientist , and , for example , we are not listening to climate scientists , we ’ re not listening to scientists who work on biodiversity and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ change.
” The environmental campaigner expressed scepticism when questioned about nations ’ pledges to reduce their carbon emissions , such as China , which has committed to reach net zero by 2060 .
“ That would be very nice if they actually meant something , ” Thunberg said .
“ We can ’ t just keep talking about future , hypothetical , vague , distant dates and pledges .
We need to do things now .
And also net zero … that is a very big loophole , you can fit a lot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ”

Guest essay by Eric Worrall
According to Greta Thunberg we listened to scientific advice about Covid-19, but for some reason we are ignoring advice from climate scientists and biodiversity specialists.
‘We cannot make it without science’: Greta Thunberg says climate experts are being ignored
Climate specialists not being listened to despite Covid showing importance of following science, activist says
PA Media
Wed 30 Dec 2020 02.42 AEDT
…
In a joint interview with the author Margaret Atwood, broadcast on BBC Radio 4 on Tuesday as part of the two-times Booker prize-winning writer’s guest-editing of the Today programme.
Thunberg was asked if the pandemic’s impact on people’s appreciation of science would have an effect on climate information.
“It could definitely have. I think this pandemic has shone a light on how … we are depending on science and that we cannot make it without science,” Thunberg said.
“But of course, we are only listening to one type of scientist, or some types of scientist, and, for example, we are not listening to climate scientists, we’re not listening to scientists who work on biodiversity and that, of course, needs to change.”
The environmental campaigner expressed scepticism when questioned about nations’ pledges to reduce their carbon emissions, such as China, which has committed to reach net zero by 2060.
“That would be very nice if they actually meant something,” Thunberg said. “We can’t just keep talking about future, hypothetical, vague, distant dates and pledges. We need to do things now. And also net zero … that is a very big loophole, you can fit a lot in that word ‘net’.”
…


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-31--Britain’s new climate plan that could make millions of homes unsellable

Reposted from Not A Lot Of People Know That Last week , the government ’ s Climate Change Committee published its ‘ Sixth Carbon Budget ’ recommending what it thinks the government needs to do in order to meet its target of achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050 .
Much comment revolved around the proposed ban on new gas boilers from 2033 , after which homes would have to be heated either by electric heat pump or possibly by hydrogen boilers , should the government decide to repurpose the existing gas distribution network for hydrogen .
But there is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ document that was hardly reported : a proposal that the sale of properties be banned from 2028 unless they score at least a grade C in an energy performance certificate ( EPC ) .
This has serious implications because millions of British homes will not reach this level and can not be brought up to this standard at any reasonable cost .
I have serious doubts as to whether an EPC energy grade means anything , given that it is just a crude estimate of how well an computer algorithm thinks it ought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how it performs in practice .
Moreover , these reports seem highly sensitive to who is carrying them out – I hade two done on my home in the space of a year , one of which gave me a score of 42 out of 100 and the second , after I had replaced some windows with better-insulated ones , gave me a score of 32 .
The report informed me that even if I undertook all the recommendations in the EPC , which consisted of fitting solar panels and replacing the boiler @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me up to a score of 49 – a grade E. In other words , I could spend over £10,000 and still I wouldn ’ t be allowed to sell my house and nobody would be allowed to buy it .
Not only that , the Climate Change Committee recommends that mortgages shouldn ’ t be allowed on homes with a EPC rating of less than ‘ C ’ by 2033 .
So you , you won ’ t be able to sell , or to have a mortgage on your home .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
There are nine million homes in Britain which , like mine , have solid walls .
It is going to be virtually impossible to bring many of them up to a ‘ C ’ rating unless their walls are insulated .
You can do that ‘ cheaply ’ by stick insulation on the inside or outside , but even so that will cost – in the case of a three bedroom home – between £7000 and £13,000 , according to Which .
But it is fraught with problems .
If your house @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proof course – which applies to just about any house built before the 1920s – you could be trapping in damp .
More realistically , to achieve a grade ‘ C ’ rating you would have to undertake a complete refurbishment , stripping the property back to the bricks and starting again .
For millions of homeowners , that is not an option .
Has the Climate Change Committee thought for the moment of the repercussions of its recommended policy : to make millions of homes unsaleable ?
These unsaleable properties would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the many thousands of recently-built homes which , although they notionally have excellent energy performance , are unsaleable thanks to flammable cladding and insulation .

Reposted from Not A Lot Of People Know That
DECEMBER 31, 2020
By Paul Homewood
Last week, the government’s Climate Change Committee published its ‘Sixth Carbon Budget’ recommending what it thinks the government needs to do in order to meet its target of achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050. Much comment revolved around the proposed ban on new gas boilers from 2033, after which homes would have to be heated either by electric heat pump or possibly by hydrogen boilers, should the government decide to repurpose the existing gas distribution network for hydrogen.
But there is a far bigger nasty concealed in the document that was hardly reported: a proposal that the sale of properties be banned from 2028 unless they score at least a grade C in an energy performance certificate (EPC).
This has serious implications because millions of British homes will not reach this level and cannot be brought up to this standard at any reasonable cost. I have serious doubts as to whether an EPC energy grade means anything, given that it is just a crude estimate of how well an computer algorithm thinks it ought to perform, not a test of how it performs in practice.
Moreover, these reports seem highly sensitive to who is carrying them out – I hade two done on my home in the space of a year, one of which gave me a score of 42 out of 100 and the second, after I had replaced some windows with better-insulated ones, gave me a score of 32. The report informed me that even if I undertook all the recommendations in the EPC, which consisted of fitting solar panels and replacing the boiler, it was only going to bring me up to a score of 49 – a grade E.
In other words, I could spend over £10,000 and still I wouldn’t be allowed to sell my house and nobody would be allowed to buy it. Not only that, the Climate Change Committee recommends that mortgages shouldn’t be allowed on homes with a EPC rating of less than ‘C’ by 2033. So you, you won’t be able to sell, or to have a mortgage on your home. What are you supposed to do then?
There are nine million homes in Britain which, like mine, have solid walls. It is going to be virtually impossible to bring many of them up to a ‘C’ rating unless their walls are insulated. You can do that ‘cheaply’ by stick insulation on the inside or outside, but even so that will cost – in the case of a three bedroom home – between £7000 and £13,000, according to Which. But it is fraught with problems. If your house wasn’t built with a damp proof course – which applies to just about any house built before the 1920s – you could be trapping in damp. More realistically, to achieve a grade ‘C’ rating you would have to undertake a complete refurbishment, stripping the property back to the bricks and starting again. For millions of homeowners, that is not an option.
Has the Climate Change Committee thought for the moment of the repercussions of its recommended policy: to make millions of homes unsaleable? These unsaleable properties would be in addition, of course, to the many thousands of recently-built homes which, although they notionally have excellent energy performance, are unsaleable thanks to flammable cladding and insulation.
Like this: Like Loading…
Related