iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-11--Ivermectin “obliterates” transmission of Covid, but it’s too cheap to be used

Some things matter .
The biggest scandal of Covid — the one worth fighting for — is that there are drugs that work , which are safe and well tested , but they suffer from the crippling problem of being too cheap for our captured public health institutions to use .
Because they are old safe , mass produced and out of patent no Pharmaceutical giant will make mass profits , which dooms them to being ignored , under researched , and generally scoffed at in rude dismissive terms .
The biggest failure of our government health agencies right now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the astronomical event horizon beyond which cheap safe drugs disappear without a trace .
3,000 people are dying every day in the USA and 5,000 a day are dying in Europe , mostly from a problem which can be solved to a large extent .
Sure , the media hate HCQ because “ Donald ” .
But it ’ s not just HCQ and it ’ s not just Trump — the media ignore all the cheap antivirals and all the rich nations have the same medical Black Hole .
This is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Big Pharma .
The Age of Antivirals is here and hardly anyone even knows [ … ]

Some things matter. The biggest scandal of Covid — the one worth fighting for — is that there are drugs that work, which are safe and well tested, but they suffer from the crippling problem of being too cheap for our captured public health institutions to use. Because they are old safe, mass produced and out of patent no Pharmaceutical giant will make mass profits, which dooms them to being ignored, under researched, and generally scoffed at in rude dismissive terms.
The biggest failure of our government health agencies right now is the Black Hole of Medicine — the astronomical event horizon beyond which cheap safe drugs disappear without a trace.
3,000 people are dying every day in the USA and 5,000 a day are dying in Europe, mostly from a problem which can be solved to a large extent.
Sure, the media hate HCQ because “Donald”. But it’s not just HCQ and it’s not just Trump — the media ignore all the cheap antivirals and all the rich nations have the same medical Black Hole. This is the work of the Medical Swamp, captured by Big Pharma.
The Age of Antivirals is here and hardly anyone even knows […]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
via JoNova
https://ift.tt/3oHAAqO
December 11, 2020 at 04:28AM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-11--A Ban On Gas Boilers Is Yet Another Pointless Eco-Catastrophe

Successive governments have got away with adding ten billion a year to our energy bills , without us noticing .
They may now even get away with forcing us all into driving EVs .
But the ban on gas boilers could turn out to be the next government ’ s version of the poll tax , which brings the whole climate change house of cards tumbling down .
Has the Government ’ s Climate Change Committee ( CCC ) been seized by one of those gangs which promises to tarmac your driveway for £50 and then , when it has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , no , you misheard : £50 was the price per square foot ?
In its Sixth Carbon Budget , published yesterday , the CCC claims the cost of turning Britain carbon neutral by 2050 has plummeted .
It is now going to cost “ just ” £50 billion a year by 2030 .
And eventually that is all going to be cancelled out by lower fuel bills , anyway , so it will be free .
If something sounds too good to be true , you can be pretty sure it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Deal , introduced in 2013 to offer loans for energy improvements , the net cost of which would be zero because they would save more money than they cost ?
It was abandoned two years later when it became clear that improvements weren ’ t going to save nearly enough money to repay the loans .
A National Audit Office report concluded that the scheme had cost the taxpayer £17,000 per loan , with negligible reduction in carbon emissions .
Now , central to the Climate Change Committee ’ s ambitions are our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the sale of all new gas boilers by 2033 and oil boilers – relied upon by people in rural areas – by 2028 .
It is right to build new homes to high energy efficiency standards , but it is sadly all too easy to predict the result of a rushed scheme to retrofit all existing homes to make them zero carbon .
Homeowners will be fleeced , left with damp , chilly homes .
Worse , the costs are bound to fall disproportionately on the lowest- income homeowners .
Some homes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heated with hydrogen – even though the technology to produce clean hydrogen has yet to be proven on a commercial scale .
In most cases , though , the CCC wants gas boilers to be replaced with electric heat pumps .
But these cost a lot more : between £6,000 and £16,000 for a typical air-source heat pump , according to Which .
But if you live in one of Britain ’ s nine million older homes with solid walls , that is just the beginning .
Heat pumps operate on lower water @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a home effectively you may need to install much larger radiators and insulate the walls , too .
Solid wall insulation , again according to Which estimates , comes in at £7,400 if stuck on the inside ( which makes all the rooms smaller ) and £13,000 if stuck on the outside .
Damp is another potential hazard : cover an old house , built without a damp course , with cladding and insulation and you are asking for trouble .
The CCC puts a timetable of 10-15 years on bringing all homes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ level on an Energy Performance Certificate .
Where , other than the bands of cowboy contractors who will already be smacking their lips , does it think we are going to find the required workforce ?
And if you can ’ t pay to upgrade your home ?
The CCC wants the sale of all new homes which don ’ t come up to standard to be banned from 2028 , and mortgages on them to be stopped from 2033 .
In other words , if you can ’ t spend thousands to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t be able to sell it or continue paying a mortgage .
Yes , a government quango is proposing a policy which would lead to mass repossessions .
Energy efficiency and cutting carbon emissions are noble aims , but when it comes to climate change reason seems to go out of the window .
All economic and social concerns are subjugated to this one target : reaching net zero emissions by 2050 .
We ’ ve seen it with diesel cars – encouraged in spite of causing deadly nitrogen oxide emissions .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which are going to be the only option from 2030 , in spite of scant evidence that their cost will have come down and their battery range improved sufficiently by then .
It is easy to set targets , quite another to come up with practical measures to implement them at reasonable cost and without damaging side effects .
The CCC is very enthusiastic for the former , while doing little to prove that it has achieved the latter .
via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood
Successive governments have got away with adding ten billion a year to our energy bills, without us noticing. They may now even get away with forcing us all into driving EVs.
But the ban on gas boilers could turn out to be the next government’s version of the poll tax, which brings the whole climate change house of cards tumbling down.
Ross Clark writes:
Has the Government’s Climate Change Committee (CCC) been seized by one of those gangs which promises to tarmac your driveway for £50 and then, when it has finished its shoddy work, tells you, no, you misheard: £50 was the price per square foot? In its Sixth Carbon Budget, published yesterday, the CCC claims the cost of turning Britain carbon neutral by 2050 has plummeted. It is now going to cost “just” £50 billion a year by 2030. And eventually that is all going to be cancelled out by lower fuel bills, anyway, so it will be free.
If something sounds too good to be true, you can be pretty sure it is. Remember David Cameron’s Green Deal, introduced in 2013 to offer loans for energy improvements, the net cost of which would be zero because they would save more money than they cost? It was abandoned two years later when it became clear that improvements weren’t going to save nearly enough money to repay the loans. A National Audit Office report concluded that the scheme had cost the taxpayer £17,000 per loan, with negligible reduction in carbon emissions.
Now, central to the Climate Change Committee’s ambitions are our homes, in particular a proposed ban on the sale of all new gas boilers by 2033 and oil boilers – relied upon by people in rural areas – by 2028.
It is right to build new homes to high energy efficiency standards, but it is sadly all too easy to predict the result of a rushed scheme to retrofit all existing homes to make them zero carbon. Homeowners will be fleeced, left with damp, chilly homes. Worse, the costs are bound to fall disproportionately on the lowest- income homeowners.
Some homes, says the CCC, may be heated with hydrogen – even though the technology to produce clean hydrogen has yet to be proven on a commercial scale. In most cases, though, the CCC wants gas boilers to be replaced with electric heat pumps. But these cost a lot more: between £6,000 and £16,000 for a typical air-source heat pump, according to Which.
But if you live in one of Britain’s nine million older homes with solid walls, that is just the beginning. Heat pumps operate on lower water temperatures than gas boilers. To heat a home effectively you may need to install much larger radiators and insulate the walls, too. Solid wall insulation, again according to Which estimates, comes in at £7,400 if stuck on the inside (which makes all the rooms smaller) and £13,000 if stuck on the outside. Damp is another potential hazard: cover an old house, built without a damp course, with cladding and insulation and you are asking for trouble.
The CCC puts a timetable of 10-15 years on bringing all homes up to a grade “C” level on an Energy Performance Certificate. Where, other than the bands of cowboy contractors who will already be smacking their lips, does it think we are going to find the required workforce?
And if you can’t pay to upgrade your home? The CCC wants the sale of all new homes which don’t come up to standard to be banned from 2028, and mortgages on them to be stopped from 2033. In other words, if you can’t spend thousands to upgrade your home, you won’t be able to sell it or continue paying a mortgage. Yes, a government quango is proposing a policy which would lead to mass repossessions.
Energy efficiency and cutting carbon emissions are noble aims, but when it comes to climate change reason seems to go out of the window. All economic and social concerns are subjugated to this one target: reaching net zero emissions by 2050. We’ve seen it with diesel cars – encouraged in spite of causing deadly nitrogen oxide emissions. We’ve seen it with electric cars, which are going to be the only option from 2030, in spite of scant evidence that their cost will have come down and their battery range improved sufficiently by then.
It is easy to set targets, quite another to come up with practical measures to implement them at reasonable cost and without damaging side effects. The CCC is very enthusiastic for the former, while doing little to prove that it has achieved the latter.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/09/ban-gas-boilers-would-yet-another-pointless-eco-catastrophe/
via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
https://ift.tt/3oIqc24
December 11, 2020 at 04:18AM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-11--Real Meat is a Natural Product Fuelled by Solar Powered Bio-Mass

by Viv Forbes , with help from our editors Wandering recently through an arcade popular with the green smoothie set , I saw a sign boasting : “ Plant Based Meat ” .
Someone should advise those nutritional dunderheads that all real meat is plant-based .
Real beef and lamb are built from live plants like grasses , lucerne and mulga , plus salt , minerals and clay ; the best chicken is built mostly on seeds and shoots of wheat , corn and grasses plus a few worms , insects and gizzard-grit ; and when I was a kid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pollard , whey and vegetable scraps .
Cattle , sheep , pigs , goats , deer , bison , rabbits , turkeys and kangaroos have a long history of providing meat for our ancestral hunters and farmers .
In tough times the gatherers and gardeners collected and cultivated survival foods like wild onions , seasonal fruit , cabbages , tubers and grass seeds .
But there was always a celebratory feast when the hunters returned with high-nutrition meat .
Fake “ meat ” is usually made from denatured soy beans , peas and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for cultivation , planting , harvesting and transport – a huge carbon footprint .
Then they add meat glue , binders and fillers to hold it together , and artificial flavouring and colouring to make it look and taste right .
It is not natural , not green , and less healthy than the worst feed-lot meat .
Sustainable plant-based meat is made when cattle , sheep , goats , camels , deer and pigs graze natural free-range pasture which gathers solar energy via their green-leaf solar collectors .
These grazing animals harvest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also spread valuable plant fertiliser onto the ground and into the air .
Real meat is greener and healthier than any fake “ meat ” manufactured by green alchemists .
Viv Forbes has tertiary qualifications in Chemistry , Physics , Geology and Maths .
He and his wife have spent a lifetime learning how to raise healthy cattle and sheep from perennial natural pastures .
Interesting Reading : Do We Really Need Fake Meat : https : //theconsciousfarmer.com.au/do-we-really-need-fake-meat/ The Battle for our Livestock : https : //clexit.net/2016/11/04/grasslands/

by Viv Forbes, with help from our editors
Wandering recently through an arcade popular with the green smoothie set, I saw a sign boasting: “Plant Based Meat”.
Someone should advise those nutritional dunderheads that all real meat is plant-based. Real beef and lamb are built from live plants like grasses, lucerne and mulga, plus salt, minerals and clay; the best chicken is built mostly on seeds and shoots of wheat, corn and grasses plus a few worms, insects and gizzard-grit; and when I was a kid our bacon was built by porkers from pollard, whey and vegetable scraps.
Cattle, sheep, pigs, goats, deer, bison, rabbits, turkeys and kangaroos have a long history of providing meat for our ancestral hunters and farmers. In tough times the gatherers and gardeners collected and cultivated survival foods like wild onions, seasonal fruit, cabbages, tubers and grass seeds. But there was always a celebratory feast when the hunters returned with high-nutrition meat.
Fake “meat” is usually made from denatured soy beans, peas and wheat, all grown using diesel fuel for cultivation, planting, harvesting and transport – a huge carbon footprint. Then they add meat glue, binders and fillers to hold it together, and artificial flavouring and colouring to make it look and taste right. It is not natural, not green, and less healthy than the worst feed-lot meat.
Sustainable plant-based meat is made when cattle, sheep, goats, camels, deer and pigs graze natural free-range pasture which gathers solar energy via their green-leaf solar collectors. These grazing animals harvest plant biomass without using diesel and they also spread valuable plant fertiliser onto the ground and into the air.
Real meat is greener and healthier than any fake “meat” manufactured by green alchemists.
Viv Forbes has tertiary qualifications in Chemistry, Physics, Geology and Maths. He and his wife have spent a lifetime learning how to raise healthy cattle and sheep from perennial natural pastures.
Interesting Reading:
Do We Really Need Fake Meat:
https://theconsciousfarmer.com.au/do-we-really-need-fake-meat/
All Sheep are Green:
http://www.damaras.com/newsletters/200805.pdf
The Battle for our Livestock:
https://clexit.net/2016/11/04/grasslands/
via The Carbon Sense Coalition
https://ift.tt/3oF9yjK
December 11, 2020 at 02:39AM


iowaclimatescienceeducation--2020-12-11--EU leaders agree to reduce CO2 emissions after all-night talks

European Union leaders have reached a hard-fought deal to cut the bloc ’ s greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 % by the end of the decade compared with 1990 levels , avoiding a hugely embarrassing deadlock ahead of a U.N. climate meeting this weekend .
BRUSSELS — European Union leaders reached a hard-fought deal Friday to cut the bloc ’ s greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 % by the end of the decade compared with 1990 levels , avoiding a hugely embarrassing deadlock ahead of a U.N. climate meeting this weekend .
Following night-long discussions at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 27 member states approved the EU executive commission ’ s proposal to toughen the bloc ’ s intermediate target on the way to climate neutrality by mid-century , after a group of reluctant , coal-reliant countries finally accepted to support the improved goal .
Five years after the Paris agreement , the EU wants to be a leader in the fight against global warming .
Yet the bloc ’ s heads of states and governments were unable to agree on the new target the last time they met in October , mainly because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how to fund and handle the green transition .
But the long-awaited deal on a massive long-term budget and coronavirus recovery clinched Thursday by EU leaders swung the momentum .
The post EU leaders agree to reduce CO2 emissions after all-night talks appeared first on The Global Warming Policy Forum ( GWPF ) .

European Union leaders have reached a hard-fought deal to cut the bloc’s greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by the end of the decade compared with 1990 levels, avoiding a hugely embarrassing deadlock ahead of a U.N. climate meeting this weekend.
BRUSSELS — European Union leaders reached a hard-fought deal Friday to cut the bloc’s greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by the end of the decade compared with 1990 levels, avoiding a hugely embarrassing deadlock ahead of a U.N. climate meeting this weekend.
Following night-long discussions at their two-day summit in Brussels, the 27 member states approved the EU executive commission’s proposal to toughen the bloc’s intermediate target on the way to climate neutrality by mid-century, after a group of reluctant, coal-reliant countries finally accepted to support the improved goal.
Five years after the Paris agreement, the EU wants to be a leader in the fight against global warming. Yet the bloc’s heads of states and governments were unable to agree on the new target the last time they met in October, mainly because of financial concerns by eastern nations about how to fund and handle the green transition.
But the long-awaited deal on a massive long-term budget and coronavirus recovery clinched Thursday by EU leaders swung the momentum.
The post EU leaders agree to reduce CO2 emissions after all-night talks appeared first on The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF).
via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
https://ift.tt/3768yPv
December 11, 2020 at 01:44AM