alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-10-29--Commonly Used Chemicals Linked to Diabetes, Obesity, Liver Disease

New research demonstrates the dramatic impact of chemical exposures on our genes that control cellular metabolism .
Action Alert !
Researchers have found that chemical exposures influence our genes that control aging , immune function , metabolism , and more in stunning new findings .
This research adds to our growing understanding of the profound impact exposure to even small amounts of chemicals like BPA can have on our health , underscoring the need to avoid these substances and for our government to act more aggressively to protect the public rather than kowtowing to industry .
Researchers looked at over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and humans and ranked the sensitivity of 17,000 genes to chemical exposures .
Chemicals ranged from prescription drugs to environmental pollutants .
The most sensitive body system to chemical exposures was cellular metabolism , particularly a group of proteins ( PPARs ) that regulate energy balance and metabolism of fats and sugar .
Changes in PPAR activity contribute to obesity , metabolic syndrome , diabetes , and fatty liver disease .
This supports other research estimating that the vast majority of diabetes in the US is caused by BPA and other persistent organic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , hormones involved in growth ( growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor ) were also affected by chemical exposure .
Changes in the activity of these hormones affect lifespan , according to animal studies .
The study also found that genes controlling the immune system are also sensitive to chemical exposure .
Outcomes linked to dysfunctional immunity are allergy and autoimmunity , both of which have increased in prevalence as our exposure to man-made chemicals have increased .
Consider that there are 84,000 chemicals registered for use in the US and less than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agencies .
Judging by the emerging research , chemical exposures are likely a major cause of chronic disease in the US .
The government seems content with rolling the dice on the safety of these chemicals while Americans get sick .
Could part of this inaction be linked to the fact that pharmaceutical profits are driven by drugs to treat the chronic diseases caused by these chemicals ?
Let ’ s also not forget that compromised immunity , obesity , and diabetes are all major risk factors for COVID complications .
Natural medicines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of these chronic conditions , and COVID-19 , but the government won ’ t let us hear about them .
Because of government rules ( or lack thereof ) , we ’ re exposed to a host of dangerous chemicals and develop chronic health conditions ; and because of government rules , we can ’ t learn about how to treat or prevent these chronic conditions with inexpensive , safe , and effective natural medicines .
This is unacceptable .
Action Alert !
Sign our petition that seeks to reform a healthcare system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ generally can not go through FDA approval .
Please send your message immediately .

New research demonstrates the dramatic impact of chemical exposures on our genes that control cellular metabolism. Action Alert!
Researchers have found that chemical exposures influence our genes that control aging, immune function, metabolism, and more in stunning new findings. This research adds to our growing understanding of the profound impact exposure to even small amounts of chemicals like BPA can have on our health, underscoring the need to avoid these substances and for our government to act more aggressively to protect the public rather than kowtowing to industry.
Researchers looked at over 2,000 studies on mice, rats, and humans and ranked the sensitivity of 17,000 genes to chemical exposures. Chemicals ranged from prescription drugs to environmental pollutants.
The most sensitive body system to chemical exposures was cellular metabolism, particularly a group of proteins (PPARs) that regulate energy balance and metabolism of fats and sugar. Changes in PPAR activity contribute to obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and fatty liver disease. This supports other research estimating that the vast majority of diabetes in the US is caused by BPA and other persistent organic pollutants.
According to the new study, hormones involved in growth (growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor) were also affected by chemical exposure. Changes in the activity of these hormones affect lifespan, according to animal studies.
The study also found that genes controlling the immune system are also sensitive to chemical exposure. Outcomes linked to dysfunctional immunity are allergy and autoimmunity, both of which have increased in prevalence as our exposure to man-made chemicals have increased.
Consider that there are 84,000 chemicals registered for use in the US and less than 1% have been tested by government agencies. Judging by the emerging research, chemical exposures are likely a major cause of chronic disease in the US. The government seems content with rolling the dice on the safety of these chemicals while Americans get sick. Could part of this inaction be linked to the fact that pharmaceutical profits are driven by drugs to treat the chronic diseases caused by these chemicals?
Let’s also not forget that compromised immunity, obesity, and diabetes are all major risk factors for COVID complications. Natural medicines can help us prevent and control many of these chronic conditions, and COVID-19, but the government won’t let us hear about them.
Because of government rules (or lack thereof), we’re exposed to a host of dangerous chemicals and develop chronic health conditions; and because of government rules, we can’t learn about how to treat or prevent these chronic conditions with inexpensive, safe, and effective natural medicines. This is unacceptable.
Action Alert! Sign our petition that seeks to reform a healthcare system that blocks access to natural treatments that generally cannot go through FDA approval. Please send your message immediately.


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-11-12--Biden Selects Anti-Supplement Crusader

Biden Selects Anti-Supplement Crusader

Dr. David Kessler , an anti-supplement crusader , drug industry adviser , and former FDA Commissioner , has been named to Biden ’ s COVID-19 task force .
We must push back .
Action Alert !
Dr. Kessler has been named co-chair of President-elect Joe Biden ’ s COVID-19 task force .
Dr. Kessler was FDA commissioner between 1990 and 1997 .
During that time , Kessler demonstrated his hostility towards the dietary supplement industry .
The last thing we need is someone who is diametrically opposed to natural medicine in a position of power , particularly concerning how our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ natural medicines like zinc , potassium , and vitamin D have demonstrated efficacy .
The record on Dr. Kessler is clear .
In 1993 , he took aim at the supplement industry by trying to limit the health claims supplements could make under the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 .
This law gave the FDA the authority to approve disease-prevention claims for food , including supplements ( for example , “ adequate calcium throughout life may reduce the risk of osteoporosis ” ) —but Dr. Kessler said the FDA would not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supplements .
He stood before Congress that same year and compared the supplement industry to “ snake oil salesmen.
” Ironically , Dr. Kessler ’ s aggressive campaign against supplements led to a grassroots movement in favor of supplements culminating in the landmark Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 ( DSHEA ) .
Industry observers note that Dr. Kessler was “ so infuriated by the enactment of DSHEA that he ordered the FDA not to enforce the new law.
” Former FDA officials subsequently admitted that the goal of this policy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aspects of the supplement industry to run wild in hope that the law would be repealed .
Thankfully , his plan failed , but this episode demonstrates the extreme measures Dr. Kessler was willing to pursue to undermine supplement access .
Dr. Kessler also serves as board chair for the Center for Science in the Public Interest ’ s ( CSPI ) Board of Directors .
It is a fitting post for Dr. Kessler , as CSPI shares his negative views on dietary supplements .
In particular , CSPI worked to eliminate legal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A structure/function claim describes the role of a nutrient on the structure or function of the body , such as “ calcium builds strong bones , ” or “ antioxidants maintain cell integrity.
” ) There is also speculation that Dr. Kessler is being considered for a more prominent role in government , such as heading up the Health and Human Services Department .
Dr. Kessler ’ s appointment to the COVID-19 task force is therefore particularly concerning .
We are already dealing with federal agencies trying to gag doctors to prevent them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of supplements for COVID-19—supplements that were part of President Trump ’ s own treatment regimen .
There is clear evidence to suggest many natural medicines to help prevent and treat COVID .
Another potential red flag for those with natural health concerns are those with ties to the drug industry .
Dr. Kessler recently joined the Board of Directors of Ellodi Pharmaceuticals .
Rick Bright , formerly of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and another pick for the COVID-19 task force , has ping-ponged several times between government work and private @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Altea Therapeutics .
This is one of many examples of the revolving door that helps keep our crony medical system going and drug industry interests front and center .
We need people who will recognize and harness the power of natural medicines to fight COVID , not a proven supplement foe who will continue—and worse , potentially expand—this censorship campaign that is costing American lives .
Action Alert !
Write to Joe Biden ’ s transition team and tell them we need proponents of natural medicine in the COVID-19 task force , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Please send your message immediately .
By sending this message , you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID .

Dr. David Kessler, an anti-supplement crusader, drug industry adviser, and former FDA Commissioner, has been named to Biden’s COVID-19 task force. We must push back. Action Alert!
Dr. Kessler has been named co-chair of President-elect Joe Biden’s COVID-19 task force. Dr. Kessler was FDA commissioner between 1990 and 1997. During that time, Kessler demonstrated his hostility towards the dietary supplement industry. The last thing we need is someone who is diametrically opposed to natural medicine in a position of power, particularly concerning how our country deals with a virus against which natural medicines like zinc, potassium, and vitamin D have demonstrated efficacy.
The record on Dr. Kessler is clear. In 1993, he took aim at the supplement industry by trying to limit the health claims supplements could make under the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990. This law gave the FDA the authority to approve disease-prevention claims for food, including supplements (for example, “adequate calcium throughout life may reduce the risk of osteoporosis”)—but Dr. Kessler said the FDA would not approve any of the proposed claims for supplements. He stood before Congress that same year and compared the supplement industry to “snake oil salesmen.”
Ironically, Dr. Kessler’s aggressive campaign against supplements led to a grassroots movement in favor of supplements culminating in the landmark Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA). Industry observers note that Dr. Kessler was “so infuriated by the enactment of DSHEA that he ordered the FDA not to enforce the new law.” Former FDA officials subsequently admitted that the goal of this policy of non-enforcement was to allow the worst aspects of the supplement industry to run wild in hope that the law would be repealed. Thankfully, his plan failed, but this episode demonstrates the extreme measures Dr. Kessler was willing to pursue to undermine supplement access.
Dr. Kessler also serves as board chair for the Center for Science in the Public Interest’s (CSPI) Board of Directors. It is a fitting post for Dr. Kessler, as CSPI shares his negative views on dietary supplements. In particular, CSPI worked to eliminate legal structure/function claims for dietary supplements. (A structure/function claim describes the role of a nutrient on the structure or function of the body, such as “calcium builds strong bones,” or “antioxidants maintain cell integrity.”)
There is also speculation that Dr. Kessler is being considered for a more prominent role in government, such as heading up the Health and Human Services Department.
Dr. Kessler’s appointment to the COVID-19 task force is therefore particularly concerning. We are already dealing with federal agencies trying to gag doctors to prevent them from disseminating basic information about the benefits of supplements for COVID-19—supplements that were part of President Trump’s own treatment regimen. There is clear evidence to suggest many natural medicines to help prevent and treat COVID.
Another potential red flag for those with natural health concerns are those with ties to the drug industry. Dr. Kessler recently joined the Board of Directors of Ellodi Pharmaceuticals. Rick Bright, formerly of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and another pick for the COVID-19 task force, has ping-ponged several times between government work and private industry, having held positions at Novavax and Altea Therapeutics. This is one of many examples of the revolving door that helps keep our crony medical system going and drug industry interests front and center.
We need people who will recognize and harness the power of natural medicines to fight COVID, not a proven supplement foe who will continue—and worse, potentially expand—this censorship campaign that is costing American lives.
Action Alert! Write to Joe Biden’s transition team and tell them we need proponents of natural medicine in the COVID-19 task force, not demonstrated crusaders against scientifically-proven treatments. Please send your message immediately. By sending this message, you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID.


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-11-12--Help Us Save Homeopathy!

Help Us Save Homeopathy!

Help us support our allies in an effort to stop the FDA ’ s attack on this safe , natural form of medicine .
Action Alert !
Our friends at Americans for Homeopathy Choice have submitted a Citizens Petition to the FDA requesting that the agency reverse its recent actions with regard to homeopathic medicine .
Upending decades of safe regulation , in 2018 the FDA released a draft guidance that essentially stated that all homeopathic drugs are illegal .
We can not let this attack against this safe and effective form of medicine go unchecked .
Recall that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lays out the agency ’ s current position on the regulation of homeopathic drugs , says : • Any homeopathic drug that has not been considered “ generally recognized as safe and effective ” ( GRAS/E ) is considered a new drug ; • FDA has not determined that any homeopathic drugs are GRAS/E ; • A new drug can not be marketed unless it goes through the FDA ’ s approval process ; • No homeopathic drugs have gone through FDA approval nor can any producer afford to take them through the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that , while all homeopathic drugs are illegal , the FDA will apply a risk-based enforcement approach .
The agency has already begun to apply this doctrine ; earlier this year the agency attacked manufacturers of injectable homeopathic medicines .
In our coverage of this recent attack , we pointed out that there is in fact no safety issue with homeopathic medicines , which have a sterling record of safety .
A review of the evidence of adverse events related to homeopathy , which included data from 12 European countries , the US @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Brazil published between 1978 and 2010 , found a total of just 1,159 adverse events .
This equates to an average of just over 50 cases per annum across all 17 countries from which studies were conducted .
By comparison , foodborne illness contributes to on average of 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths annually in the US alone .
Worldwide , an estimated 200 million people use homeopathy regularly , including 6 million in the United States .
These data show that adverse events from homeopathic medicines occur at a very , very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ homeopathic medicines ?
The FDA gets a large part of its funding from drug company user fees , and for this reason sees Big Pharma as its client .
Homeopathic medicines , like supplements and other natural products , compete with pharmaceutical drugs , so the FDA uses its enormous power to tilt the scales in favor of the drug companies .
And because natural products and homeopathic medicines generally can not be patent-protected like drugs can , they can ’ t afford FDA-approval and so can not make disease claims .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ undermining healthcare in this country .
Sign our petition below to reform American healthcare .
In addition , go to Americans for Homeopathy Choice ’ s website to submit a comment in support of their Citizens Petition .
Action Alert !
Sign our petition to reform our healthcare system that bars and undermines natural options like homeopathic medicine .
Please sign our petition immediately .

Help us support our allies in an effort to stop the FDA’s attack on this safe, natural form of medicine. Action Alert!
Our friends at Americans for Homeopathy Choice have submitted a Citizens Petition to the FDA requesting that the agency reverse its recent actions with regard to homeopathic medicine. Upending decades of safe regulation, in 2018 the FDA released a draft guidance that essentially stated that all homeopathic drugs are illegal. We cannot let this attack against this safe and effective form of medicine go unchecked.
Recall that the FDA’s guidance document, which lays out the agency’s current position on the regulation of homeopathic drugs, says:
Any homeopathic drug that has not been considered “generally recognized as safe and effective” (GRAS/E) is considered a new drug; FDA has not determined that any homeopathic drugs are GRAS/E; A new drug cannot be marketed unless it goes through the FDA’s approval process; No homeopathic drugs have gone through FDA approval nor can any producer afford to take them through the approval process.
The guidance also explains that, while all homeopathic drugs are illegal, the FDA will apply a risk-based enforcement approach. The agency has already begun to apply this doctrine; earlier this year the agency attacked manufacturers of injectable homeopathic medicines.
In our coverage of this recent attack, we pointed out that there is in fact no safety issue with homeopathic medicines, which have a sterling record of safety. A review of the evidence of adverse events related to homeopathy, which included data from 12 European countries, the US, Mexico, India, Israel and Brazil published between 1978 and 2010, found a total of just 1,159 adverse events. This equates to an average of just over 50 cases per annum across all 17 countries from which studies were conducted. By comparison, foodborne illness contributes to on average of 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths annually in the US alone. Worldwide, an estimated 200 million people use homeopathy regularly, including 6 million in the United States. These data show that adverse events from homeopathic medicines occur at a very, very low rate.
So why go after homeopathic medicines? The FDA gets a large part of its funding from drug company user fees, and for this reason sees Big Pharma as its client. Homeopathic medicines, like supplements and other natural products, compete with pharmaceutical drugs, so the FDA uses its enormous power to tilt the scales in favor of the drug companies. And because natural products and homeopathic medicines generally cannot be patent-protected like drugs can, they can’t afford FDA-approval and so cannot make disease claims. It is one of many ways cronyism is undermining healthcare in this country.
Sign our petition below to reform American healthcare. In addition, go to Americans for Homeopathy Choice’s website to submit a comment in support of their Citizens Petition.
Action Alert! Sign our petition to reform our healthcare system that bars and undermines natural options like homeopathic medicine. Please sign our petition immediately.


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-11-12--GE Salmon Ruled Unlawful

GE Salmon Ruled Unlawful

This is a major victory for American consumers .
Action Alert !
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has ruled that the FDA violated environmental laws in approving genetically engineered ( GE ) salmon .
This is a major victory , especially considering that , given the sham GE food labeling law that Congress passed , the GE salmon would not be required to have clear labeling that it was genetically altered .
The crux of the court ’ s decision is that the FDA did not adequately consider the environmental risks of GE salmon .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the GE species could threaten wild and endangered salmon species through cross-breeding or outperforming endangered species for scarce resources and habitat .
The approval of GE salmon would make the issue of transgenic contamination—when GE species contaminate non-GE plants or animals—even worse .
This has already cost farmers millions of dollars over the years when organic crops are contaminated by GE crops .
If the approval of GE salmon wasn ’ t bad enough , the sham labeling bill would allow companies to hide the fact that the salmon was genetically altered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consumers ever use .
Cronyism is at the center of this : Congress caved to Big Food , which has a vested interest in keeping Americans in the dark about the contents of food .
This is just one way that cronyism is threatening our health : we ’ ve also been telling you about the federal government ’ s censorship of doctors who try to inform the public about natural ways of preventing and treating COVID-19 infection .
We must fight back against the many ways in which government cronyism prevents us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inexpensive natural medicines to stay healthy .
Action Alert !
Sign our petition to reform our healthcare system that bars and undermines natural options like homeopathic medicine .
Please sign our petition immediately .

This is a major victory for American consumers. Action Alert!
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has ruled that the FDA violated environmental laws in approving genetically engineered (GE) salmon. This is a major victory, especially considering that, given the sham GE food labeling law that Congress passed, the GE salmon would not be required to have clear labeling that it was genetically altered.
The crux of the court’s decision is that the FDA did not adequately consider the environmental risks of GE salmon. When GE salmon escape into the environment, the GE species could threaten wild and endangered salmon species through cross-breeding or outperforming endangered species for scarce resources and habitat.
The approval of GE salmon would make the issue of transgenic contamination—when GE species contaminate non-GE plants or animals—even worse. This has already cost farmers millions of dollars over the years when organic crops are contaminated by GE crops.
If the approval of GE salmon wasn’t bad enough, the sham labeling bill would allow companies to hide the fact that the salmon was genetically altered in a scannable QR code which few consumers ever use. Cronyism is at the center of this: Congress caved to Big Food, which has a vested interest in keeping Americans in the dark about the contents of food.
This is just one way that cronyism is threatening our health: we’ve also been telling you about the federal government’s censorship of doctors who try to inform the public about natural ways of preventing and treating COVID-19 infection. We must fight back against the many ways in which government cronyism prevents us from using clean, organic foods and inexpensive natural medicines to stay healthy.
Action Alert! Sign our petition to reform our healthcare system that bars and undermines natural options like homeopathic medicine. Please sign our petition immediately.


Our Core Mission

Why Is the Government Gagging Doctors ?
The FDA , FTC , and some states ’ attorneys general have told doctors they can ’ t advise both their patients and the public about natural prevention and treatment for COVID-19 .
The FDA and FTC sent warning letters alleging that doctors and other practitioners were making illegal claims on their websites that a product could mitigate , prevent , treat , diagnose , or cure COVID-19 or related conditions , making the product an unapproved drug under the Food , Drug , and Cosmetic Act .
This follows an ongoing attempt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and other hormones critical for women and to destroy homeopathic treatments .
All of this is an egregious violation of the patient/doctor relationship .
It also violates the right of the public to learn about nutritionally based therapies , supported by solid scientific research , that are potentially lifesaving , not only for COVID-19 but for many other illnesses as well .
What is going on here ?
The bottom line is that cronyism in healthcare is killing us .
The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the failings of a health system that relies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pharmaceutical drugs to treat chronically sick people and to a lesser extent on surgery .
We should refocus to place primary reliance on diet and lifestyle along with inexpensive , safe , affordable , and scientifically validated natural medicines .
This will greatly reduce the need for drugs and surgery and also reduce medical costs dramatically .
University research demonstrates that natural , diet derived medicines work , but because naturally-occurring substances can not be patent protected in the same way as new to nature drugs , companies can not afford the billions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them .
Without FDA approval , natural medicines can not claim to prevent , treat , or even “ mitigate ” diseases , so these medicines are not only excluded from organized medicine , but even made illegal .
This has led to many unnecessary deaths from COVID-19 as well as other illnesses .
The problem originates in our food and drug laws and especially in the way federal agencies interpret these laws to enforce rigid drug company monopolies .
Until this model changes , we will continue to be a nation full @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on expensive drugs that are often unsafe or ineffective but are always very expensive .
Here ’ s how the system works , or rather does not work .
First , drug companies claim a legal monopoly when they patent a drug .
The drug research usually has been done by a university using government money or by the government itself but it does not matter .
The grant of monopoly to the private company stands .
Then the drug company takes the patented medication through the FDA approval process ( often costing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decade ) .
This includes randomized controlled trials ( RCTs ) , which , by the government ’ s own estimate , cost as much as $ 600 million each , and involve between 10,000 and 30,000 participants .
Drug companies do not object to this ordeal , because the stiff price both eliminates any competition from unpatentable treatments and also flows into the salaries of FDA employees , who consequently tend to take a friendly view of drug companies and zealously guard the legal exclusivity of their products .
Because of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ companies to pay billions to run RCTs and get FDA approval .
Natural substances , being generally not patentable , or not fully patentable , are shut out of this system , but for that very reason are much , much cheaper .
Since natural products are not patentable , nobody can afford to run RCTs and get the FDA ( or FTC ) approval that is required to make a “ disease ” claim .
In addition , natural products are often not suitable for RCT testing as a standalone molecule .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ not be taken without another for balance , so that drug trials are not the best way to prove efficacy .
In effect , the present RCT exclusive FDA approval process is a backhanded way of preventing all disease claims for natural products—no matter how many other valid scientific studies support the claim— thus preserving the monopoly of pharmaceutical drugs to prevent , treat , or mitigate illness .
The amount of research from respected universities validating natural treatments Is enormous , but is entirely rejected by the FDA , which demands its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can easily take a decade .
As experience has shown , even an extended approval process does not necessarily guarantee even the safety of a new to nature and therefore patentable molecule .
And after approval has been granted , there is not guarantee that the ingredients used to make the drug are safe .
An estimated 80 % of drugs are made from ingredients from China or India , and the FDA only inspects about 1 % of these imports .
Since 2018 , six widely prescribed drugs have been revealed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ university research behind them , we also know that natural medicines are effective in treating disease because drug companies use the FDA approval process to turn copycat versions of them into drugs .
In prior years , this was mostly done by creating synthetic analogues of natural substances which , unlike natural products , are patentable , but which , being new to our bodies , often turn out to be toxic .
As this has become more problematic , the new trend is for drug companies to claim “ novel use ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from hemp ) or more commonly the FDA may just seize the natural product and turn it into a protected drug monopoly free from price competition .
Doctors hear about the patented monopoly drugs , because they have been approved by the FDA , drug companies are free to promote them for disease , and it is worth spending billions to promote them .
In addition , medical journals are largely supported by drug companies and so is much of doctors ’ post-med-school education .
Just as importantly , a doctor who strays @ @ @ @ @ @ @ easily lose his or her medical license , a ruinous outcome after so many years of expensive education .
The threat is not just to doctors and their license to practice .
The FDA has even threatened cherry and walnut growers with fines and jail for mentioning respected university studies on the health benefits of those simple foods .
The agencies say that any reference to these benefits turns cherries and walnuts into unapproved drugs !
FDA enforcement includes armed raids and threats of a lifetime in jail for any producer who makes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ takes the position that for producers to make health claims for these heavily researched and very ealthy “ superfoods , ” they must first turn them into drugs through the drug approval process .
The Department of Health and Human Services and the US Department of Agriculture have stated that , based on studies , these percentages of Americans are getting less than the government recommended average amount of the following nutrients , which are found in good foods like cherries and walnuts among many others : Note that this is based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the nutrient needed .
Even using government recommendations , Americans are getting only : • 75 % of magnesium they need .
• 54 % of the vitamin E they need • 68 % of the vitamin A they need • 19 % of the vitamin D they need .
Does this matter ?
Indeed it does .
The US Center for Disease Control also tells us that low magnesium may be associated with high blood pressure , heart disease , bone loss , and headaches , but that is only part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Health reports that magnesium has been found to be needed for over 300 human body functions .
Magnesium must also be in balance with calcium for our muscles to work properly and for much else .
Studies show that COVID-19 deaths correlate almost perfectly with vitamin D level ( Blaylock Wellness Report , July 2020 , p.4 ) .
It has been estimated that raising the blood level of D in Americans to at least 40 ng/mL would save 336,000 lives a year from a variety of fatal illnesses , a figure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Some clinicians recommend getting blood levels above 65 .
No one pays any attention to these statistics .
Why ?
Because under federal law , as interpreted by the FDA and FTC , we are not allowed to hear that a lack of vitamin D leads to weak bones , immune system deficiencies , and from there to death from COVID-19 , other illnesses , and cancer .
Does this mean that all medicines should be from natural sources ?
Of course not .
New , patentable drugs may have genuine promise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has enabled scientists to extend the life of mice far beyond natural limits .
Drug trials are currently underway on dogs that are expected to yield similar results .
After that there will be ten years or more of human trials , also quite likely to be successful .
One wonders if elderly US senators and members of Congress realize that their own lives could be measurably extended if we adopted Singapore ’ s drug approval system , which only requires safety studies , so that these new life extending therapies could be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a few decades .
Then again , doctors gave President Trump a treatment for COVID , Regeneron ’ s Polyclonal Antibody Cocktail , that is not yet FDA approved , which violated the law .
Will members of Congress become exempt from the law as well ?
Regardless , how many people must die only because of the rigidities of our present system ?
Our medical system is failing us in other ways as well .
Medical system errors are generally ranked as the third leading cause of death in America .
Some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , not third , and in any case all such estimates are likely to be understated because the data mostly misses what happens outside hospitals and often misses even what happens inside hospitals .
Worse , this only measures errors , such as prescribing the wrong drug .
It does not include any of the deaths caused by poor nutrition or lifestyle caused by general ignorance of the link to disease , an ignorance that our present law and regulatory systems enforce under penalty of fines and jail .
Why is it so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
It took from the 1920 ’ s until 1964 for the American government to admit that tobacco smoking causes cancer and it took an additional fifteen years for the American Medical Association to agree .
It also took forty years for the government to admit that trans-fat is dangerous and another fourteen years to ban it in processed foods , where it was a mainstay .
Even today the government says that adding table sugar to your diet is OK if you limit it to 10 % of calories .
These cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ food processing , and sugar industries respectively .
Today the power of these industries pales beside the overwhelming dominance of drug companies , fueled by government mandated monopoly profits .
What we have is an out-of-control medical crony capitalist system in which private interests spend what it takes to gain mastery over Congress and regulatory agencies .
The result is unnecessary suffering and death along with spiraling medical costs .
It is past time for the American public to put a stop to this perversion of both healthy business competition and good government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ federal law and with FDA and FTC interpretation and enforcement of that law .
Our law should permit anyone to cite reputable , non-fraudulent science studies of health prevention and treatment .
This should apply to doctors , producers , and , yes , even drug companies .
The role of the FDA should be to confirm evidence of safety .
It lacks the staff expertise or freedom from political and drug company influence to do more .
Judgement of efficacy should be left to medical professionals , as it was in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and as it is in Singapore today .
Singapore has one of the most sophisticated medical systems in the world , and it has deliberately chosen not to follow the U.S. model .
Two simple steps will transform our medical system .
Will we take them ?

Why Is the Government Gagging Doctors?
The FDA, FTC, and some states’ attorneys general have told doctors they can’t advise both their patients and the public about natural prevention and treatment for COVID-19. The FDA and FTC sent warning letters alleging that doctors and other practitioners were making illegal claims on their websites that a product could mitigate, prevent, treat, diagnose, or cure COVID-19 or related conditions, making the product an unapproved drug under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
This follows an ongoing attempt by these agencies to ban bio-identical estriol and other hormones critical for women and to destroy homeopathic treatments. All of this is an egregious violation of the patient/doctor relationship. It also violates the right of the public to learn about nutritionally based therapies, supported by solid scientific research, that are potentially lifesaving, not only for COVID-19 but for many other illnesses as well.
What is going on here? The bottom line is that cronyism in healthcare is killing us. The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the failings of a health system that relies exclusively on newly-patented and therefore very expensive pharmaceutical drugs to treat chronically sick people and to a lesser extent on surgery. We should refocus to place primary reliance on diet and lifestyle along with inexpensive, safe, affordable, and scientifically validated natural medicines. This will greatly reduce the need for drugs and surgery and also reduce medical costs dramatically.
University research demonstrates that natural, diet derived medicines work, but because naturally-occurring substances cannot be patent protected in the same way as new to nature drugs, companies cannot afford the billions it takes to win FDA approval for them. Without FDA approval, natural medicines cannot claim to prevent, treat, or even “mitigate” diseases, so these medicines are not only excluded from organized medicine, but even made illegal. This has led to many unnecessary deaths from COVID-19 as well as other illnesses.
The problem originates in our food and drug laws and especially in the way federal agencies interpret these laws to enforce rigid drug company monopolies. Until this model changes, we will continue to be a nation full of sick people, spending ever more on expensive drugs that are often unsafe or ineffective but are always very expensive.
Here’s how the system works, or rather does not work. First, drug companies claim a legal monopoly when they patent a drug. The drug research usually has been done by a university using government money or by the government itself but it does not matter. The grant of monopoly to the private company stands.
Then the drug company takes the patented medication through the FDA approval process (often costing billions over what can easily be a decade). This includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which, by the government’s own estimate, cost as much as $600 million each, and involve between 10,000 and 30,000 participants. Drug companies do not object to this ordeal, because the stiff price both eliminates any competition from unpatentable treatments and also flows into the salaries of FDA employees, who consequently tend to take a friendly view of drug companies and zealously guard the legal exclusivity of their products.
Because of the patent, it is feasible for drug companies to pay billions to run RCTs and get FDA approval. Natural substances, being generally not patentable, or not fully patentable, are shut out of this system, but for that very reason are much, much cheaper. Since natural products are not patentable, nobody can afford to run RCTs and get the FDA (or FTC) approval that is required to make a “disease” claim. In addition, natural products are often not suitable for RCT testing as a standalone molecule. In many cases, one supplement should not be taken without another for balance, so that drug trials are not the best way to prove efficacy. In effect, the present RCT exclusive FDA approval process is a backhanded way of preventing all disease claims for natural products—no matter how many other valid scientific studies support the claim— thus preserving the monopoly of pharmaceutical drugs to prevent, treat, or mitigate illness.
The amount of research from respected universities validating natural treatments Is enormous, but is entirely rejected by the FDA, which demands its own approval process, a process that can easily take a decade. As experience has shown, even an extended approval process does not necessarily guarantee even the safety of a new to nature and therefore patentable molecule. And after approval has been granted, there is not guarantee that the ingredients used to make the drug are safe. An estimated 80% of drugs are made from ingredients from China or India, and the FDA only inspects about 1% of these imports. Since 2018, six widely prescribed drugs have been revealed to be contaminated.
In addition to the university research behind them, we also know that natural medicines are effective in treating disease because drug companies use the FDA approval process to turn copycat versions of them into drugs. In prior years, this was mostly done by creating synthetic analogues of natural substances which, unlike natural products, are patentable, but which, being new to our bodies, often turn out to be toxic. As this has become more problematic, the new trend is for drug companies to claim “novel use” patents (as with CBD, derived from hemp) or more commonly the FDA may just seize the natural product and turn it into a protected drug monopoly free from price competition.
Doctors hear about the patented monopoly drugs, because they have been approved by the FDA, drug companies are free to promote them for disease, and it is worth spending billions to promote them. In addition, medical journals are largely supported by drug companies and so is much of doctors’ post-med-school education. Just as importantly, a doctor who strays too far from the FDA reservation can easily lose his or her medical license, a ruinous outcome after so many years of expensive education.
The threat is not just to doctors and their license to practice. The FDA has even threatened cherry and walnut growers with fines and jail for mentioning respected university studies on the health benefits of those simple foods. The agencies say that any reference to these benefits turns cherries and walnuts into unapproved drugs! FDA enforcement includes armed raids and threats of a lifetime in jail for any producer who makes medical claims without permission. The agency takes the position that for producers to make health claims for these heavily researched and very ealthy “superfoods,” they must first turn them into drugs through the drug approval process.
The Department of Health and Human Services and the US Department of Agriculture have stated that, based on studies, these percentages of Americans are getting less than the government recommended average amount of the following nutrients, which are found in good foods like cherries and walnuts among many others:
Potassium: 100%
Vitamin D: 94%
Choline: 92%
Vitamin E: 89%
Vitamin K: 67%
Magnesium: 52%
Vitamin A: 43%
Vitamin C: 39%
Note that this is based on very low government estimates of the amount of the nutrient needed. Even using government recommendations, Americans are getting only:
75% of magnesium they need.
54% of the vitamin E they need
68% of the vitamin A they need
19% of the vitamin D they need.
Does this matter? Indeed it does. The US Center for Disease Control also tells us that low magnesium may be associated with high blood pressure, heart disease, bone loss, and headaches, but that is only part of it. The US National Institute for Health reports that magnesium has been found to be needed for over 300 human body functions. Magnesium must also be in balance with calcium for our muscles to work properly and for much else.
Studies show that COVID-19 deaths correlate almost perfectly with vitamin D level (Blaylock Wellness Report, July 2020, p.4). It has been estimated that raising the blood level of D in Americans to at least 40 ng/mL would save 336,000 lives a year from a variety of fatal illnesses, a figure far greater than COVID-19 deaths to date. Some clinicians recommend getting blood levels above 65.
No one pays any attention to these statistics. Why? Because under federal law, as interpreted by the FDA and FTC, we are not allowed to hear that a lack of vitamin D leads to weak bones, immune system deficiencies, and from there to death from COVID-19, other illnesses, and cancer.
Does this mean that all medicines should be from natural sources? Of course not. New, patentable drugs may have genuine promise. At the present time, technology has enabled scientists to extend the life of mice far beyond natural limits. Drug trials are currently underway on dogs that are expected to yield similar results. After that there will be ten years or more of human trials, also quite likely to be successful. One wonders if elderly US senators and members of Congress realize that their own lives could be measurably extended if we adopted Singapore’s drug approval system, which only requires safety studies, so that these new life extending therapies could be available in a few years rather than a few decades.
Then again, doctors gave President Trump a treatment for COVID, Regeneron’s Polyclonal Antibody Cocktail, that is not yet FDA approved, which violated the law. Will members of Congress become exempt from the law as well? Regardless, how many people must die only because of the rigidities of our present system?
Our medical system is failing us in other ways as well. Medical system errors are generally ranked as the third leading cause of death in America. Some credible research has suggested it is first, not third, and in any case all such estimates are likely to be understated because the data mostly misses what happens outside hospitals and often misses even what happens inside hospitals. Worse, this only measures errors, such as prescribing the wrong drug. It does not include any of the deaths caused by poor nutrition or lifestyle caused by general ignorance of the link to disease, an ignorance that our present law and regulatory systems enforce under penalty of fines and jail.
Why is it so hard to reform the American healthcare system? It took from the 1920’s until 1964 for the American government to admit that tobacco smoking causes cancer and it took an additional fifteen years for the American Medical Association to agree. It also took forty years for the government to admit that trans-fat is dangerous and another fourteen years to ban it in processed foods, where it was a mainstay. Even today the government says that adding table sugar to your diet is OK if you limit it to 10% of calories.
These cases reflect the power of the tobacco, food processing, and sugar industries respectively. Today the power of these industries pales beside the overwhelming dominance of drug companies, fueled by government mandated monopoly profits. What we have is an out-of-control medical crony capitalist system in which private interests spend what it takes to gain mastery over Congress and regulatory agencies. The result is unnecessary suffering and death along with spiraling medical costs.
It is past time for the American public to put a stop to this perversion of both healthy business competition and good government. The place to begin is with federal law and with FDA and FTC interpretation and enforcement of that law. Our law should permit anyone to cite reputable, non-fraudulent science studies of health prevention and treatment. This should apply to doctors, producers, and, yes, even drug companies.
The role of the FDA should be to confirm evidence of safety. It lacks the staff expertise or freedom from political and drug company influence to do more. Judgement of efficacy should be left to medical professionals, as it was in the U.S before the 1962 Kefauver Harris Amendment and as it is in Singapore today. Singapore has one of the most sophisticated medical systems in the world, and it has deliberately chosen not to follow the U.S. model.
Two simple steps will transform our medical system. Will we take them?


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-11-19--Consumer-Driven Health Reform at Risk

Consumer-Driven Health Reform at Risk

A number of consumer-friendly changes to health insurance are in danger of being reversed .
We must protect them .
Action Alert !
We at ANH have written numerous articles on the burdensome regulations that prevent a consumer-friendly health insurance marketplace from developing .
Over the last few years , a number of reforms have been accomplished that loosen the straight-jacket the Affordable Care Act has put us in to allow more choice in healthcare .
We must demand that these changes be cemented into law .
In an excellent article , John Goodman of the Goodman Institute points out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bipartisan support .
Most of these have been accomplished through executive order or other administrative action , which means they can be reversed .
For many of us , fewer choices and higher premiums have characterized the healthcare marketplace since the Affordable Care Act was passed .
These reforms give us more choice and flexibility with regard to healthcare .
Telehealth is a key example , which we ’ ve covered previously .
Telehealth lowers healthcare costs , since telehealth visits are inherently less expensive than in-person visits .
There are a number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make permanent changes in the rules to allow more access to telemedicine ( currently , many of these changes are in response to the pandemic and could revert back once the public health emergency it is over ) .
We noted that there are also pushes to mandate that insurers reimburse for telemedicine at the same rate as in-person visits ( called payment parity ) .
These crony price-fixing schemes are designed to thwart competition and keep healthcare costs high , and must be opposed .
Price transparency has also been required of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is a crucial reform : hospitals are a crony capitalist mess and charge vastly different prices for the same services—even facilities in the same area .
This much-needed reform will allow consumers to avoid hospitals charging extortionist prices .
We must make sure it is codified into law .
A number of other key reforms introduce flexibility and consumer choice into health insurance .
For example , Health Savings Accounts ( HSAs ) were expanded to make it easier for HSA holders to get treatments for chronic illnesses covered .
Health Reimbursement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under an executive order to allow employers to give tax-free money to employees to buy their own insurance .
Other reforms extend healthcare options that are free of Obamacare restrictions , give states flexibility to reform their own healthcare markets , expand specialized health plans that offer insurance to patients with a particular disease , and expand access to direct primary care ( also called concierge medicine ) .
Significant steps have been taken to allow more consumer-driven healthcare options to flourish .
But this still all takes place in the context of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government is gagging doctors for talking about supplement benefits , attacking homeopathic medicine , and on the verge of banning estriol .
Help us fight for real healthcare reform .
Action Alert !
Write to Congress and tell them to cement recent gains in healthcare reform .
Please send your message immediately .
By sending this message , you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID .

A number of consumer-friendly changes to health insurance are in danger of being reversed. We must protect them. Action Alert!
We at ANH have written numerous articles on the burdensome regulations that prevent a consumer-friendly health insurance marketplace from developing. Over the last few years, a number of reforms have been accomplished that loosen the straight-jacket the Affordable Care Act has put us in to allow more choice in healthcare. We must demand that these changes be cemented into law.
In an excellent article, John Goodman of the Goodman Institute points out a number of these reforms that have bipartisan support. Most of these have been accomplished through executive order or other administrative action, which means they can be reversed.
For many of us, fewer choices and higher premiums have characterized the healthcare marketplace since the Affordable Care Act was passed. These reforms give us more choice and flexibility with regard to healthcare.
Telehealth is a key example, which we’ve covered previously. Telehealth lowers healthcare costs, since telehealth visits are inherently less expensive than in-person visits. There are a number of bills in Congress that seek to make permanent changes in the rules to allow more access to telemedicine (currently, many of these changes are in response to the pandemic and could revert back once the public health emergency it is over). We noted that there are also pushes to mandate that insurers reimburse for telemedicine at the same rate as in-person visits (called payment parity). These crony price-fixing schemes are designed to thwart competition and keep healthcare costs high, and must be opposed.
Price transparency has also been required of hospitals, per an executive order. This is a crucial reform: hospitals are a crony capitalist mess and charge vastly different prices for the same services—even facilities in the same area. This much-needed reform will allow consumers to avoid hospitals charging extortionist prices. We must make sure it is codified into law.
A number of other key reforms introduce flexibility and consumer choice into health insurance. For example, Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) were expanded to make it easier for HSA holders to get treatments for chronic illnesses covered. Health Reimbursement Accounts (HRAs) were also expanded under an executive order to allow employers to give tax-free money to employees to buy their own insurance.
Other reforms extend healthcare options that are free of Obamacare restrictions, give states flexibility to reform their own healthcare markets, expand specialized health plans that offer insurance to patients with a particular disease, and expand access to direct primary care (also called concierge medicine).
Significant steps have been taken to allow more consumer-driven healthcare options to flourish. But this still all takes place in the context of a crony medical system in which the government is gagging doctors for talking about supplement benefits, attacking homeopathic medicine, and on the verge of banning estriol. Help us fight for real healthcare reform.
Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them to cement recent gains in healthcare reform. Please send your message immediately. By sending this message, you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID.


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-11-18--Your Supplements on FDA’s Hit List

Your Supplements on FDA’s Hit List

The FDA is on the record supporting mandatory product listing for dietary supplements—that is , requiring each supplement manufacturer to register all the products it makes , including all the ingredients of those products , with the FDA .
It ’ s a strong possibility that with a Democratic appointee—which could be anti-supplement crusader Dr. David Kessler—as FDA commissioner or Secretary of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) , this dangerous regulation will be aggressively pursued .
Make no mistake : this innocuous-sounding proposal could spell big trouble for supplement access .
We must proactively oppose it .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ improve the FDA ’ s ability to root out bad actors who sell dangerous products .
It is a laudable goal , but the FDA already has the authority to go after companies that break the law and use illegal ingredients .
The agency can , and has , enforced this law , as it should .
The mandatory list is a concern given the current state of the FDA ’ s “ new supplement ” guidance .
This guidance , seeks to impose drug-like pre-approval requirements on all “ new supplements ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The FDA ’ s proposed definition of a “ new supplement ” is extremely broad , and the agency ’ s guidance is estimated to eliminate as many as 41,700 products from the market .
A mandatory list could then be used to target and eliminate supplements that have not yet complied with the FDA ’ s over-reaching policy .
A mandatory list is also a concern because of its likely use to create a list of supplements that might lead to “ adverse events , ” similar to a legislative effort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we defeated a number of years ago .
In that case , the list would be created by the FDA and the National Academies of Science , Engineering , and Medicine ( NASEM ) —the same body that once said people up to the age of 70 don ’ t need more than 600 IU of vitamin D per day , and above 4000 IU may be dangerous .
Keep in mind that researchers are recommending 4,000 IU of vitamin D a day to help reduce the severity of COVID-19 .
Some people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amount to achieve optimal blood levels of 60 ng/ml .
The point is this : a mandatory list could be used to target supplements and to remove “ dangerous ” high-dose supplements that don ’ t gel with the government ’ s pitifully low recommended dosages .
It doesn ’ t matter who is in office , this is a threat : Dr. Scott Gottlieb , former FDA commissioner under Trump , voiced support for the idea .
A Democratic nominee and anti-supplement crusader like Dr. David Kessler is even more likely to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Write to Congress and tell them to oppose the nomination of Dr. Kessler to head the FDA or HHS .
Please send your message immediately .
By sending this message , you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID .

A new regulation for supplements threatens access. Action Alert!
The FDA is on the record supporting mandatory product listing for dietary supplements—that is, requiring each supplement manufacturer to register all the products it makes, including all the ingredients of those products, with the FDA. It’s a strong possibility that with a Democratic appointee—which could be anti-supplement crusader Dr. David Kessler—as FDA commissioner or Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), this dangerous regulation will be aggressively pursued. Make no mistake: this innocuous-sounding proposal could spell big trouble for supplement access. We must proactively oppose it.
The stated purpose for mandatory listing is to improve the FDA’s ability to root out bad actors who sell dangerous products. It is a laudable goal, but the FDA already has the authority to go after companies that break the law and use illegal ingredients. The agency can, and has, enforced this law, as it should.
The mandatory list is a concern given the current state of the FDA’s “new supplement” guidance. This guidance, seeks to impose drug-like pre-approval requirements on all “new supplements” that came to the market after 1994. The FDA’s proposed definition of a “new supplement” is extremely broad, and the agency’s guidance is estimated to eliminate as many as 41,700 products from the market. A mandatory list could then be used to target and eliminate supplements that have not yet complied with the FDA’s over-reaching policy.
A mandatory list is also a concern because of its likely use to create a list of supplements that might lead to “adverse events,” similar to a legislative effort by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) we defeated a number of years ago. In that case, the list would be created by the FDA and the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM)—the same body that once said people up to the age of 70 don’t need more than 600 IU of vitamin D per day, and above 4000 IU may be dangerous. Keep in mind that researchers are recommending 4,000 IU of vitamin D a day to help reduce the severity of COVID-19. Some people may need four to five times that amount to achieve optimal blood levels of 60 ng/ml.
The point is this: a mandatory list could be used to target supplements and to remove “dangerous” high-dose supplements that don’t gel with the government’s pitifully low recommended dosages. It doesn’t matter who is in office, this is a threat: Dr. Scott Gottlieb, former FDA commissioner under Trump, voiced support for the idea.
The main issue, though, is the FDA’s still-incomplete “new supplement” guidance that threatens thousands of supplements on the market, which, under a Democratic administration, is in danger of moving forward. We have to push back.
Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them to oppose the “new supplement” guidance being completed as is. Please send your message immediately. By sending this message, you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID.


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-12-03--Big Ag, Big Chem Ally Up for Big Job

Big Ag, Big Chem Ally Up for Big Job

The largest agribusinesses and chemical giants are building support in the new administration , and beyond .
Action Alert !
President-elect Joe Biden is reportedly considering former US senator and Big Ag ally Heidi Heitkamp ( D-ND ) as the next Secretary of Agriculture .
Separately , the Food and Agriculture Organization ( FAO ) of the United Nations recently announced a pending partnership with CropLife , the trade association for the pesticide and biotech industry .
We must oppose this blatant cronyism .
Sen. Heitkamp ’ s industry-friendly record as a senator is enough to disqualify her from serving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opposed mandatory labeling of GMO foods , supporting voluntary labeling that was backed by industry .
She also advocated on behalf of the fossil fuel industry , sponsoring legislation that would roll back environmental regulations .
This shouldn ’ t have shocked anyone : before being elected as a senator , she worked for 12 years as the director of the Dakota Gasification Company ’ s Great Plains Synfuels Plant .
In addition , Heitkamp was financially supported by some of the world ’ s largest agribusinesses : Bayer-Monsanto gave her $ 13,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 12,500 , she received $ 9,000 from Syngenta , and $ 4,000 from Cargill .
All of this suggests that , if appointed , Sen. Heitkamp would stand up for industry rather than consumers .
Biden also appointed Michael McCabe to his EPA transition team ; McCabe led DuPont ’ s defense of the toxic PFAS chemical PFOA—precisely the kinds of chemicals that put us more at risk from severe COVID-19 infection .
Big Ag has also made substantial inroads at the international level with CropLife ’ s partnership with the FAO .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ an alliance if its member companies did not stand to make huge gains selling their pesticides and herbicides to the world market .
Seeing as the United States is the largest contributor to the FAO ’ s budget , US taxpayers are subsidizing this cash grab from Big Ag at the expense of some of the world ’ s most vulnerable populations .
We are beset on all sides from rampant cronyism , and we must oppose it where we can .
We ’ ve also been telling you about the federal government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to inform the public about natural ways of preventing and treating COVID-19 infection .
We must fight back against the many ways in which government cronyism prevents us from using clean , organic foods and inexpensive natural medicines to stay healthy .
Action Alert !
Oppose the appointment of Sen. Heitkamp to the USDA .
Please send your message immediately .
By sending this message , you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID .

The largest agribusinesses and chemical giants are building support in the new administration, and beyond. Action Alert!
President-elect Joe Biden is reportedly considering former US senator and Big Ag ally Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) as the next Secretary of Agriculture. Separately, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations recently announced a pending partnership with CropLife, the trade association for the pesticide and biotech industry. We must oppose this blatant cronyism.
Sen. Heitkamp’s industry-friendly record as a senator is enough to disqualify her from serving as Secretary of the USDA. She opposed mandatory labeling of GMO foods, supporting voluntary labeling that was backed by industry. She also advocated on behalf of the fossil fuel industry, sponsoring legislation that would roll back environmental regulations. This shouldn’t have shocked anyone: before being elected as a senator, she worked for 12 years as the director of the Dakota Gasification Company’s Great Plains Synfuels Plant.
In addition, Heitkamp was financially supported by some of the world’s largest agribusinesses: Bayer-Monsanto gave her $13,000, Archer Daniels Midland gave her $12,500, she received $9,000 from Syngenta, and $4,000 from Cargill. All of this suggests that, if appointed, Sen. Heitkamp would stand up for industry rather than consumers.
Biden also appointed Michael McCabe to his EPA transition team; McCabe led DuPont’s defense of the toxic PFAS chemical PFOA—precisely the kinds of chemicals that put us more at risk from severe COVID-19 infection.
Big Ag has also made substantial inroads at the international level with CropLife’s partnership with the FAO. CropLife would surely not invest in such an alliance if its member companies did not stand to make huge gains selling their pesticides and herbicides to the world market. Seeing as the United States is the largest contributor to the FAO’s budget, US taxpayers are subsidizing this cash grab from Big Ag at the expense of some of the world’s most vulnerable populations.
We are beset on all sides from rampant cronyism, and we must oppose it where we can. We’ve also been telling you about the federal government’s censorship of doctors who try to inform the public about natural ways of preventing and treating COVID-19 infection. We must fight back against the many ways in which government cronyism prevents us from using clean, organic foods and inexpensive natural medicines to stay healthy.
Action Alert! Oppose the appointment of Sen. Heitkamp to the USDA. Please send your message immediately. By sending this message, you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID.


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-12-03--How Deadly is COVID?

How Deadly is COVID?

A sobering look at the numbers offers reason for hope .
Action Alert !
For a deeper look at the numbers underlying this chart , consult this table .
Charts and data are courtesy of our , who also offer this analysis : While it ’ s hard to ignore the very raised excess mortality in some but certainly not all countries during the first wave , the pattern of excess mortality even in most of the countries hit hardest during the first wave is now pretty typical for the time of year .
It ’ s therefore no exaggeration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the first wave , COVID posed a threat that was in line with a bad flu season .
Right now , for the vast majority of the world , it looks a lot more like a typical flu season .
The pandemic did , however , give the FDA and FTC an opportunity to turn the screws on natural medicine , censoring doctors for sharing the most basic information on medicines that can help us prevent and treat COVID-19 infection .
Action Alert !
Sign our petition that seeks to reform a healthcare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that generally can not go through FDA approval .
Please send your message immediately .

A sobering look at the numbers offers reason for hope. Action Alert!
For a deeper look at the numbers underlying this chart, consult this table.
Charts and data are courtesy of Our World in Data and our friends at ANH International , who also offer this analysis:
While it’s hard to ignore the very raised excess mortality in some but certainly not all countries during the first wave, the pattern of excess mortality even in most of the countries hit hardest during the first wave is now pretty typical for the time of year. It’s therefore no exaggeration to say, at its worst during the first wave, COVID posed a threat that was in line with a bad flu season. Right now, for the vast majority of the world, it looks a lot more like a typical flu season.
The pandemic did, however, give the FDA and FTC an opportunity to turn the screws on natural medicine, censoring doctors for sharing the most basic information on medicines that can help us prevent and treat COVID-19 infection.
Action Alert! Sign our petition that seeks to reform a healthcare system that blocks access to natural treatments that generally cannot go through FDA approval. Please send your message immediately.


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-12-03--Big Ag, Big Chem Team Up

Big Ag, Big Chem Team Up


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-12-03--How Deadly is COVID Right Now?

How Deadly is COVID Right Now?

A sobering look at the numbers offers reason for hope .
Action Alert !
For a deeper look at the numbers underlying this chart , consult this table .
Charts and data are courtesy of Our World in Data and our , who also offer this analysis : While it ’ s hard to ignore the very raised excess mortality in some but certainly not all countries during the first wave , the pattern of excess mortality even in most of the countries hit hardest during the first wave is now pretty typical for the time of year .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , at its worst during the first wave , COVID posed a threat that was in line with a bad flu season .
Right now , for the vast majority of the world , it looks a lot more like a typical flu season .
The pandemic did , however , give the FDA and FTC an opportunity to turn the screws on natural medicine , censoring doctors for sharing the most basic information on medicines that can help us prevent and treat COVID-19 infection .
Action Alert !
Sign our petition that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blocks access to natural treatments that generally can not go through FDA approval .
Please send your message immediately .


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-12-10--FDA Shuts Down Natural Pain Options

FDA Shuts Down Natural Pain Options

FDA-approved pain medicines are dangerous , but the government is systematically attacking safer , non-addictive natural treatments .
Action Alert !
A recent study in Switzerland found that acetaminophen poisoning increased by 40 % following the approval of 1,000mg doses .
This is just the latest data to indicate the public health problems caused by this commonly used pain drug , which is the active ingredient in Tylenol .
Despite the dangers of FDA-approved pain drugs , the federal government aggressively attacks and censors natural pain medicines like homeopathic treatments , CBD , medical foods , and supplements .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve written for years about the dangers of acetaminophen .
It is the most commonly prescribed class of drugs despite causing 50 percent of all liver failure in the US .
According to the FDA ’ s adverse event database , acetaminophen has caused more than 100,000 adverse events and more than 78,000 serious adverse events , including 24,000 deaths .
It has also been linked to asthma and hearing loss .
Overdoses involving opioids killed nearly 47,000 people in 2018 alone .
Now consider the federal government ’ s approach to natural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all injectable homeopathic medicines , which includes Traumeel , a prescription-only homeopathic medicine for pain with an extremely robust safety profile .
Previously , the FDA went after Limbrel , a medical food for the treatment of osteoarthritis .
In a letter to Primus , the FDA stated that 194 adverse event reports for Limbrel were received between 2007 and 2017—about 20 a year .
Then , of course , there ’ s CBD .
The federal government ’ s approach to CBD right now is frankly a mess , and we ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coverage .
In short , hemp and its derivatives have been legalized at the federal level , but FDA laws still apply to products containing hemp , such as supplements , lotions , cosmetics , etc .
Since 2018 , the FDA has been trying to figure out how it will treat these products .
Recall , too , that the agency has approved a CBD drug , and according to FDA rules , this means that CBD can not legally be sold as a supplement .
We ultimately don ’ t know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If history provides any clues , the FDA will protect the drug-approval process and ban CBD supplements .
To add to the confusion , Congress is directing the FDA to release an interim policy ( called a policy of enforcement discretion ) explaining how it will treat CBD products in the marketplace as the agency develops its final regulatory framework .
Will the FDA release an interim policy that allows CBD supplements for the time being before banning them outright when a final policy is released ?
We just don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the FDA will not do the right thing , especially when Big Pharma profits are at stake .
It is unconscionable , but unsurprising , that the FDA would reduce access to safe , non-addictive alternatives to dangerous opioid drugs that killed 30,000 people in 2018 alone .
We ’ ve also seen basic information on natural health censored to protect drug industry profits during the COVID-19 pandemic .
This cronyism has to stop .
Action Alert !
Write to Congress and the FDA , telling them to issue a policy of enforcement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CBD supplements at therapeutic levels and full-spectrum hemp oil .
Please send your message immediately .
By sending this message , you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID .

FDA-approved pain medicines are dangerous, but the government is systematically attacking safer, non-addictive natural treatments. Action Alert!
A recent study in Switzerland found that acetaminophen poisoning increased by 40% following the approval of 1,000mg doses. This is just the latest data to indicate the public health problems caused by this commonly used pain drug, which is the active ingredient in Tylenol. Despite the dangers of FDA-approved pain drugs, the federal government aggressively attacks and censors natural pain medicines like homeopathic treatments, CBD, medical foods, and supplements. This needless suffering must end.
We’ve written for years about the dangers of acetaminophen. It is the most commonly prescribed class of drugs despite causing 50 percent of all liver failure in the US. According to the FDA’s adverse event database, acetaminophen has caused more than 100,000 adverse events and more than 78,000 serious adverse events, including 24,000 deaths. It has also been linked to asthma and hearing loss.
Overdoses involving opioids killed nearly 47,000 people in 2018 alone.
Now consider the federal government’s approach to natural pain medicines. The FDA essentially banned all injectable homeopathic medicines, which includes Traumeel, a prescription-only homeopathic medicine for pain with an extremely robust safety profile.
Previously, the FDA went after Limbrel, a medical food for the treatment of osteoarthritis. In a letter to Primus, the FDA stated that 194 adverse event reports for Limbrel were received between 2007 and 2017—about 20 a year.
Then, of course, there’s CBD. The federal government’s approach to CBD right now is frankly a mess, and we’ve sifted through the details in previous coverage. In short, hemp and its derivatives have been legalized at the federal level, but FDA laws still apply to products containing hemp, such as supplements, lotions, cosmetics, etc. Since 2018, the FDA has been trying to figure out how it will treat these products. Recall, too, that the agency has approved a CBD drug, and according to FDA rules, this means that CBD cannot legally be sold as a supplement.
We ultimately don’t know how the FDA will treat CBD supplements. If history provides any clues, the FDA will protect the drug-approval process and ban CBD supplements. To add to the confusion, Congress is directing the FDA to release an interim policy (called a policy of enforcement discretion) explaining how it will treat CBD products in the marketplace as the agency develops its final regulatory framework. Will the FDA release an interim policy that allows CBD supplements for the time being before banning them outright when a final policy is released? We just don’t know, but we should assume that the FDA will not do the right thing, especially when Big Pharma profits are at stake.
It is unconscionable, but unsurprising, that the FDA would reduce access to safe, non-addictive alternatives to dangerous opioid drugs that killed 30,000 people in 2018 alone. We’ve also seen basic information on natural health censored to protect drug industry profits during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cronyism has to stop.
Action Alert! Write to Congress and the FDA, telling them to issue a policy of enforcement discretion that protects consumer access to hemp-derived CBD supplements at therapeutic levels and full-spectrum hemp oil. Please send your message immediately. By sending this message, you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID.


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-12-10--Dangers of Antibiotics for Kids

Dangers of Antibiotics for Kids

Concerning data from a new study shows the dangers of antibiotic use in young children .
Action Alert !
A new study found that children younger than two who are given antibiotics are more likely to develop ongoing medical conditions later in life .
Given the multitude of natural alternatives to antibiotics , it is shameful that the medical establishment continues to rely on these drugs , particularly when antibiotic resistant infections are on the rise and killing thousands of people a year .
It is further evidence of a backwards medical system that throttles natural medicine to protect Pharma @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mayo Clinic Proceedings , found early antibiotic exposure was associated with increased risk of childhood-onset asthma , allergic rhinitis , atopic dermatitis , celiac disease , overweight , obesity , and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder .
Children exposed to antibiotics had a higher probability of having combinations of conditions , particularly when given multiple prescriptions .
Previously , we reported on a study , conducted at the Cincinnati Children ’ s Hospital , suggesting that exposure to antibiotics in the womb may permanently weaken the child ’ s immune system and increase the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggests that mainstream medicine is once again causing needless suffering .
Consider this evidence about alternatives to antibiotics : • Some evidence suggests that vitamin C could be effective in fighting antibiotic resistant infections .
• There have been studies showing that ozone therapy—which increases the amount of oxygen in the body—can be an effective treatment for TB .
• An Italian study found that thyme and clove essential oils were effective in treating bacterial vaginosis .
• A US study found tea-tree oil was a more effective treatment for staph-infected wounds than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the anti-pathenogenic properties of colloidal silver , the world ’ s oldest known antibiotic .
Further , Russell Blaylock , MD , a leading integrative physician , discussed several important studies on silver in his May 2016 newsletter : • One study found that adding just a small amount of nano-sized silver to antibiotics made the treatment much more potent in killing a resistant type of bacteria .
• Nanosilver can also destroy the bacterium ’ s biofilm—a protective organic coating that helps protect the bacteria from antibiotics .
One study showed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bacteria susceptible to lower doses of antibiotics .
Researchers found this strategy to be effective against some of the most dangerous bacteria .
Natural alternatives are clearly supported by good research .
But sadly , research doesn ’ t seem to be enough .
Silver , essential oils , and vitamin C can not be strongly patented like drugs can , and so can not make billions for drug companies .
Then , to prevent these treatments from competing on a level playing field with drugs , the FDA bars the public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must put a stop to this .
Action Alert !
Sign our petition that seeks to reform a healthcare system that blocks access to natural treatments that generally can not go through FDA approval .
Please send your message immediately .

Concerning data from a new study shows the dangers of antibiotic use in young children. Action Alert!
A new study found that children younger than two who are given antibiotics are more likely to develop ongoing medical conditions later in life. Given the multitude of natural alternatives to antibiotics, it is shameful that the medical establishment continues to rely on these drugs, particularly when antibiotic resistant infections are on the rise and killing thousands of people a year. It is further evidence of a backwards medical system that throttles natural medicine to protect Pharma profits.
The study, published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, found early antibiotic exposure was associated with increased risk of childhood-onset asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, celiac disease, overweight, obesity, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Children exposed to antibiotics had a higher probability of having combinations of conditions, particularly when given multiple prescriptions. Previously, we reported on a study, conducted at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, suggesting that exposure to antibiotics in the womb may permanently weaken the child’s immune system and increase the likelihood of lung disease.
This evidence suggests that mainstream medicine is once again causing needless suffering. Consider this evidence about alternatives to antibiotics:
Some evidence suggests that vitamin C could be effective in fighting antibiotic resistant infections.
that vitamin C could be effective in fighting antibiotic resistant infections. There have been studies showing that ozone therapy—which increases the amount of oxygen in the body—can be an effective treatment for TB.
showing that ozone therapy—which increases the amount of oxygen in the body—can be an effective treatment for TB. An Italian study found that thyme and clove essential oils were effective in treating bacterial vaginosis.
found that thyme and clove essential oils were effective in treating bacterial vaginosis. A US study found tea-tree oil was a more effective treatment for staph-infected wounds than conventional treatments.
found tea-tree oil was a more effective treatment for staph-infected wounds than conventional treatments. Additional research found that lemongrass oil could reduce MRSA.
We’ve reported on the anti-pathenogenic properties of colloidal silver, the world’s oldest known antibiotic.
Further, Russell Blaylock, MD, a leading integrative physician, discussed several important studies on silver in his May 2016 newsletter:
One study found that adding just a small amount of nano-sized silver to antibiotics made the treatment much more potent in killing a resistant type of bacteria.
that adding just a small amount of nano-sized silver to antibiotics made the treatment much more potent in killing a resistant type of bacteria. Nanosilver can also destroy the bacterium’s biofilm—a protective organic coating that helps protect the bacteria from antibiotics. One study showed that nanosilver destroyed the biofilm, making the bacteria susceptible to lower doses of antibiotics. Researchers found this strategy to be effective against some of the most dangerous bacteria.
Natural alternatives are clearly supported by good research. But sadly, research doesn’t seem to be enough. Silver, essential oils, and vitamin C cannot be strongly patented like drugs can, and so cannot make billions for drug companies. Then, to prevent these treatments from competing on a level playing field with drugs, the FDA bars the public from learning about their benefits. We must put a stop to this.
Action Alert! Sign our petition that seeks to reform a healthcare system that blocks access to natural treatments that generally cannot go through FDA approval. Please send your message immediately.


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-12-16--Congress: Our Plans for 2021

Congress: Our Plans for 2021

Season ’ s Greetings from all of us at the Alliance for Natural Health USA .
You can support our @ @ @ @ @ name to our petition .
If you wish to support our end of year giving @ @ @ @ @ here .

Season’s Greetings from all of us at the Alliance for Natural Health USA. You can support our new legislation by adding your name to our petition. If you wish to support our end of year giving campaign you can do so here.


alliancefornaturalhealth--2020-12-16--You’re Being Zapped With Dirty Electricity

Experts continue to warn of the dangers of 5G , but the dangers of electromagnetic radiation ( EMF ) exposure go far beyond 5G .
Action Alert !
As our friends at ANH-International point out , a new consensus statement has been released to reflect the concerns of medical and scientific experts and practitioners around the world on the acute and chronic health effects from EMF .
In the statement , more than 3,500 medical doctors call for a moratorium on 5G , wireless smart meters , and other new sources of EMF emissions .
This echoes what ANH and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now .
But the truth is that EMF emissions that could be affecting human health are ubiquitous in our environment , most likely including our homes and offices .
We ’ ve written a number of articles over the years detailing the dangers from 5G , the next generation of wireless technology .
The concerns are tied to the fact that the deployment of 5G networks necessitate the placement of many “ small cell ” towers to create a network , since 5G utilizes millimeter wavelengths that are more easily blocked by physical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will increase our exposure to the EMF emitted from these “ small cells , ” which has experts around the world concerned about possible human health effects .
Others are sounding the alarm about another source of exposure to EMF : “ dirty ” electricity , or electrical pollution .
Dirty electricity is a form of EMF that is generated by electronic devices that , when they operate , convert AC power to DC , creating high-frequency voltage spikes that flow back into the power grid , piggy-back on existing electrical wiring , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of dirty electricity include : smart meters , LED lights , light dimmer switches , wireless technology , computers , solar panels , video game consoles , phone chargers , and even kitchen appliances .
The type of EMF exposure caused by dirty electricity is at a lower frequency on the electromagnetic spectrum than that from 5G , which relies on millimeter waves ( this site has a visual of where 5G is on the spectrum compared to other sources of EMF ) .
So while dirty electricity may not present the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are still a source of EMF exposure that may cause problems for some people , particularly those who are sensitive to EMF .
Research conducted on schools situated near cell towers have shown the potential health effects of dirty electricity .
A study in three Minnesota schools found that reducing dirty electricity by 90 percent improved teacher health ( reduced headaches , general weakness , asthma , depression , anxiety , and skin irritation ) and student behavior .
A study on a school in La Quinta , California demonstrated similar results .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ by installing filters that short out high frequencies and reduce transients on electrical wiring .
There are some measures that can be taken to protect your home from dirty electricity .
As mentioned above , special filters can be bought to reduce dirty electricity ( such as this one ) .
But the best way to eliminate or reduce dirty electricity is to eliminate the sources , or at the very least to unplug them when they are not in use .
We can also call on elected officials to halt 5G expansion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposure to EMF , until it is proven safe for human and environmental health .
Action Alert !
Write to Congress and tell them to halt 5G until it is proven safe .
Please send your message immediately .
By sending this message , you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID .

Experts continue to warn of the dangers of 5G, but the dangers of electromagnetic radiation (EMF) exposure go far beyond 5G. Action Alert!
As our friends at ANH-International point out, a new consensus statement has been released to reflect the concerns of medical and scientific experts and practitioners around the world on the acute and chronic health effects from EMF. In the statement, more than 3,500 medical doctors call for a moratorium on 5G, wireless smart meters, and other new sources of EMF emissions. This echoes what ANH and others have been saying for some time now. But the truth is that EMF emissions that could be affecting human health are ubiquitous in our environment, most likely including our homes and offices.
We’ve written a number of articles over the years detailing the dangers from 5G, the next generation of wireless technology. The concerns are tied to the fact that the deployment of 5G networks necessitate the placement of many “small cell” towers to create a network, since 5G utilizes millimeter wavelengths that are more easily blocked by physical objects like trees and buildings. This will increase our exposure to the EMF emitted from these “small cells,” which has experts around the world concerned about possible human health effects.
Others are sounding the alarm about another source of exposure to EMF: “dirty” electricity, or electrical pollution. Dirty electricity is a form of EMF that is generated by electronic devices that, when they operate, convert AC power to DC, creating high-frequency voltage spikes that flow back into the power grid, piggy-back on existing electrical wiring, and radiate into the environment. Sources of dirty electricity include: smart meters, LED lights, light dimmer switches, wireless technology, computers, solar panels, video game consoles, phone chargers, and even kitchen appliances.
The type of EMF exposure caused by dirty electricity is at a lower frequency on the electromagnetic spectrum than that from 5G, which relies on millimeter waves (this site has a visual of where 5G is on the spectrum compared to other sources of EMF). So while dirty electricity may not present the same health concerns as 5G networks, they are still a source of EMF exposure that may cause problems for some people, particularly those who are sensitive to EMF.
Research conducted on schools situated near cell towers have shown the potential health effects of dirty electricity. A study in three Minnesota schools found that reducing dirty electricity by 90 percent improved teacher health (reduced headaches, general weakness, asthma, depression, anxiety, and skin irritation) and student behavior. A study on a school in La Quinta, California demonstrated similar results. In both studies the results were achieved by installing filters that short out high frequencies and reduce transients on electrical wiring.
There are some measures that can be taken to protect your home from dirty electricity. As mentioned above, special filters can be bought to reduce dirty electricity (such as this one). But the best way to eliminate or reduce dirty electricity is to eliminate the sources, or at the very least to unplug them when they are not in use.
We can also call on elected officials to halt 5G expansion, which will otherwise dramatically increase our exposure to EMF, until it is proven safe for human and environmental health.
Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them to halt 5G until it is proven safe. Please send your message immediately. By sending this message, you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID.