noqreport--2020-01-17--Dana Loesch highlights the left’s grotesque double standards

Senator Bernie Sanders is a frontrunner for the Democratic nomination for president .
He has the strongest fundraising apparatus and a ground game that far exceeds the quality and scope of most of his competitors .
Included in that ground game is Kyle Jurek , a paid field organizer who was made famous by Project Veritas earlier this week .
In their most recent exposé , James O ’ Keefe and his intrepid investigative journalists caught Jurek demonstrating the type of hatred and preparation for violence that is indicative of those who want to be revolutionaries .
His threats against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ path on his way to securing the nomination were actually quite scary .
How has the left responded ?
They have been universally adamant and publicly appalled by one of their own being caught spewing vitriol .
But he ’ s a unique case , they say .
He doesn ’ t represent how other Bernie revolutionaries behave , nor do his feelings reflect anyone else in the movement , they say .
It ’ s unfair for conservatives to generalize , they say .
Gun owners ’ rights activist Dana Loesch agreed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s not fair to characterize an entire group based on the actions of the few bad apples .
She supports the left ’ s contention , which is why if they ’ re being consistent , they would apply their detached uniqueness criteria to criminals who use firearms .
She illustrated this point by drawing the appropriate parallels .
There are nearly 400 million guns in the United States .
That ’ s 1.2 for every man , woman , and child .
The vast majority of these firearms are not used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ percentage of guns used in crimes is lower than the percentage of Kyle Jurek ’ s on the Sanders campaign staff .
They say the group should not be punished or generalized as being like Jurek .
If they ’ re being consistent , they should also believe that lawful gun owners should not be punished or generalized as being like gun-toting criminals .
If we cut through the hypocrisy , disregard the inconsistencies , and deny the contradictions , we ’ re still stuck with one conclusion .
The left has a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ others , including gun owners , and one they apply to themselves .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Senator Bernie Sanders is a frontrunner for the Democratic nomination for president. He has the strongest fundraising apparatus and a ground game that far exceeds the quality and scope of most of his competitors. Included in that ground game is Kyle Jurek, a paid field organizer who was made famous by Project Veritas earlier this week.
In their most recent exposé, James O’Keefe and his intrepid investigative journalists caught Jurek demonstrating the type of hatred and preparation for violence that is indicative of those who want to be revolutionaries. His threats against anyone who stands in Senator Sanders’ path on his way to securing the nomination were actually quite scary.
How has the left responded? They have been universally adamant and publicly appalled by one of their own being caught spewing vitriol. But he’s a unique case, they say. He doesn’t represent how other Bernie revolutionaries behave, nor do his feelings reflect anyone else in the movement, they say. It’s unfair for conservatives to generalize, they say.
Gun owners’ rights activist Dana Loesch agreed. Well, sort of. It’s not fair to characterize an entire group based on the actions of the few bad apples. She supports the left’s contention, which is why if they’re being consistent, they would apply their detached uniqueness criteria to criminals who use firearms. She illustrated this point by drawing the appropriate parallels.
The left: You can’t use this guy and other staff as representatives of all Sanders’ supporters Also the left: A criminal who commits a crime with a gun is representative of ALL gun owners https://t.co/vUbWkmimft — Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) January 17, 2020
There are nearly 400 million guns in the United States. That’s 1.2 for every man, woman, and child. The vast majority of these firearms are not used in crimes. In fact, the percentage of guns used in crimes is lower than the percentage of Kyle Jurek’s on the Sanders campaign staff. They say the group should not be punished or generalized as being like Jurek. If they’re being consistent, they should also believe that lawful gun owners should not be punished or generalized as being like gun-toting criminals.
If we cut through the hypocrisy, disregard the inconsistencies, and deny the contradictions, we’re still stuck with one conclusion. The left has a double standard: one they apply to others, including gun owners, and one they apply to themselves.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-17--Mass killings: A constant reality of the human condition

In recent modern history , we ’ ve seen pressure cookers , fertilizer , trucks , knives , guns , and hijacked airplanes used by depraved individuals to kill people .
It should appear beyond dispute that these crimes are not merely a consequence of access to weapons or would-be weapons .
Mass killings are some of the most premeditated crimes .
Those who plan and perpetrate such crimes are acting upon far deeper and concerning realities than just ease of access to the means to carry out their designs .
The fact is when someone gets it in their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are going to find a way to do it .
As we can , unfortunately , see in the many stabbings that have occurred in the UK and elsewhere in Europe , an inability to obtain a firearm doesn ’ t magically turn a would-be murderer back into a peaceful , law-abiding citizen .
Nor does an inability to obtain a firearm necessarily mitigate the death that can ensue .
The two worst mass shootings in modern American history are the Las Vegas Shooting ( 58 dead , 413 wounded ) and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 53 wounded ) .
In terms of police officer deaths , the worst instances were the Dallas Shooting ( 5 officers killed ) and the Seattle Ambush ( 4 officers killed ) .
The Nice Truck Attack , in France , rivals both of the mass shootings above ( 86 dead , 458 wounded ) , as do the Madrid Train Bombings ( 193 dead , 2,000 wounded ) , and the 2015 Paris Attacks ( 131 dead , 413 wounded ) .
As for officers killed , just this last October @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attack , and four officers were killed , with a knife .
All of these are rivaled by 9/11 , which resulted in nearly 3,000 deaths and over 25,000 wounded ( many of them first responders ) .
This was accomplished by terrorists who hijacked airplanes armed only with box cutters .
Beyond the above high-profile attacks , those of us in the West rarely connect the circumstances of mass shootings in our countries with the continued violence and mass killings perpetrated continuously in developing countries .
The reality is , mass killings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in every generation , and in every corner of the world .
As I recently tweeted , “ The psychological conditions that lead to mass murder are uniquely HUMAN realities .
History documents them in the earliest written records , they ’ ve existed in every century , and they presently exist in every country of the world .
This is not uniquely American.
” And , if we can be frank for a moment , despite these heart-rending attacks , things are largely much better today than they have ever been throughout @ @ @ @ @ @ @ centuries ago when government had a monopoly on violence and the tools to commit violence .
Before human rights , including the right of self-defense and the right to bear arms , became enshrined ideas of liberal government , mass killings were not only shockingly prevalent but were often state policy .
Even in American history , where such rights were ostensibly valued , there has been mass murder and campaigns of violence perpetrated as a direct result of disarmament .
Wounded Knee remains the largest mass shooting in American history with over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ began as an order to disarm the Lakota Indians camped there .
In the aftermath of the Civil War , southern states enacted Black Codes that effectively made carrying firearms illegal for African Americans .
This enabled a literal reign of terror as the Ku Klux Klan killed and assaulted thousands of African Americans disallowed from owning the means to protect themselves .
( Even today , the 2nd Amendment rights of African Americans are mostly non-existent , which likely plays a role in African Americans facing the most government-directed and criminal violence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ population ) Again , I can ’ t state it more clearly : this is typical government behavior for most of human history .
Most wars and conquests concluded with pillaging , raping , and murder .
Most regimes kept their populations in check with brutal and indiscriminate violence .
For most of human history , the ownership of weapons was a unique privilege of the ruling classes .
As I mentioned earlier , this constitutes a government monopoly on violence .
History is rife with examples of such a monopoly utilized to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we generally see today committed by individuals .
Please don ’ t misunderstand me .
I ’ m not one of those “ this is the cost of liberty ” types .
I don ’ t throw up my hands and assert that “ nothing can be done.
” I am only pointing out that far too many people are looking at the issue of mass shootings from an extremely narrow understanding of history and of the crimes themselves .
If we want to craft ways to truly combat the occurrence of mass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ understand certain realities .
First , mass shootings are only a narrow subsection of the broader category of mass murder , and such crimes occur everywhere .
Second , this isn ’ t a uniquely American phenomenon that only exists as a pernicious consequence of toxic gun culture .
Third , the idea that re-establishing the government ’ s monopoly on violence and the control of weaponry will end mass murder is verifiably false , given the examples of history .
I am willing to concede that we can enact some modest measures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of criminals and would-be criminals .
But such measures should only be a very small part of a broader vision to ensure adequate security of likely targets , better proactive enforcement of existing laws , and swift responses to actual attacks .
The constant and consistent focus on legal gun ownership is the most significant thing standing in the way of real solutions capable of mitigating what is , unfortunately , a constant reality of the human condition .
This article is adapted from a segment of The Liberty Letter , a recurring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
In recent modern history, we’ve seen pressure cookers, fertilizer, trucks, knives, guns, and hijacked airplanes used by depraved individuals to kill people. It should appear beyond dispute that these crimes are not merely a consequence of access to weapons or would-be weapons.
Mass killings are some of the most premeditated crimes. Those who plan and perpetrate such crimes are acting upon far deeper and concerning realities than just ease of access to the means to carry out their designs.
The fact is when someone gets it in their heart that they want to kill, they are going to find a way to do it. As we can, unfortunately, see in the many stabbings that have occurred in the UK and elsewhere in Europe, an inability to obtain a firearm doesn’t magically turn a would-be murderer back into a peaceful, law-abiding citizen. Nor does an inability to obtain a firearm necessarily mitigate the death that can ensue.
The two worst mass shootings in modern American history are the Las Vegas Shooting (58 dead, 413 wounded) and the Orlando Nightclub Shooting (49 dead, 53 wounded). In terms of police officer deaths, the worst instances were the Dallas Shooting (5 officers killed) and the Seattle Ambush (4 officers killed).
The Nice Truck Attack, in France, rivals both of the mass shootings above (86 dead, 458 wounded), as do the Madrid Train Bombings (193 dead, 2,000 wounded), and the 2015 Paris Attacks (131 dead, 413 wounded). As for officers killed, just this last October, a Paris police station came under attack, and four officers were killed, with a knife.
All of these are rivaled by 9/11, which resulted in nearly 3,000 deaths and over 25,000 wounded (many of them first responders). This was accomplished by terrorists who hijacked airplanes armed only with box cutters.
Beyond the above high-profile attacks, those of us in the West rarely connect the circumstances of mass shootings in our countries with the continued violence and mass killings perpetrated continuously in developing countries. The reality is, mass killings are something we see throughout history, in every generation, and in every corner of the world.
As I recently tweeted, “The psychological conditions that lead to mass murder are uniquely HUMAN realities. History documents them in the earliest written records, they’ve existed in every century, and they presently exist in every country of the world. This is not uniquely American.”
And, if we can be frank for a moment, despite these heart-rending attacks, things are largely much better today than they have ever been throughout history. It was only a few centuries ago when government had a monopoly on violence and the tools to commit violence. Before human rights, including the right of self-defense and the right to bear arms, became enshrined ideas of liberal government, mass killings were not only shockingly prevalent but were often state policy.
Even in American history, where such rights were ostensibly valued, there has been mass murder and campaigns of violence perpetrated as a direct result of disarmament.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
Wounded Knee remains the largest mass shooting in American history with over 250 killed and 51 wounded, and began as an order to disarm the Lakota Indians camped there.
In the aftermath of the Civil War, southern states enacted Black Codes that effectively made carrying firearms illegal for African Americans. This enabled a literal reign of terror as the Ku Klux Klan killed and assaulted thousands of African Americans disallowed from owning the means to protect themselves. (Even today, the 2nd Amendment rights of African Americans are mostly non-existent, which likely plays a role in African Americans facing the most government-directed and criminal violence of any other segment of the American population)
Again, I can’t state it more clearly: this is typical government behavior for most of human history. Most wars and conquests concluded with pillaging, raping, and murder. Most regimes kept their populations in check with brutal and indiscriminate violence. For most of human history, the ownership of weapons was a unique privilege of the ruling classes.
As I mentioned earlier, this constitutes a government monopoly on violence. History is rife with examples of such a monopoly utilized to perpetrate crimes far more devastating than what we generally see today committed by individuals.
Please don’t misunderstand me. I’m not one of those “this is the cost of liberty” types. I don’t throw up my hands and assert that “nothing can be done.” I am only pointing out that far too many people are looking at the issue of mass shootings from an extremely narrow understanding of history and of the crimes themselves.
If we want to craft ways to truly combat the occurrence of mass shootings, we have to recognize and understand certain realities. First, mass shootings are only a narrow subsection of the broader category of mass murder, and such crimes occur everywhere. Second, this isn’t a uniquely American phenomenon that only exists as a pernicious consequence of toxic gun culture. Third, the idea that re-establishing the government’s monopoly on violence and the control of weaponry will end mass murder is verifiably false, given the examples of history.
I am willing to concede that we can enact some modest measures to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals and would-be criminals. But such measures should only be a very small part of a broader vision to ensure adequate security of likely targets, better proactive enforcement of existing laws, and swift responses to actual attacks.
The constant and consistent focus on legal gun ownership is the most significant thing standing in the way of real solutions capable of mitigating what is, unfortunately, a constant reality of the human condition.
“Nations, states, and central banks are quietly but rapidly shifting their money to precious metals. With bank runs, recession, CBDCs, and worse on the horizon, it’s easy to see why. NOW is the time to learn more about moving portions of your retirement or wealth to a self-directed gold and silver IRA through an America-First, Christian precious metals company.” – JD Rucker (not a financial advisor, just a guy who’s paying attention)
This article is adapted from a segment of The Liberty Letter, a recurring newsletter written by Justin Stapley.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--Socialist George Orwell understood what socialist leaders really wanted

There are a couple of nasty myths floating around American political circles .
They have intensified as we near the 2020 election because one of President Trump ’ s potential opponents is Senator Bernie Sanders .
The myths are these : Socialism has never properly been tried and Sanders has a version of it that can work .
Both of these concepts are false .
It has been tried .
Over and over again , we see nations take the necessary steps to install a proper socialist government , only to have their efforts fail miserably for the people while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We can see this on clear display with Venezuela , which Sanders once promoted as the proper model .
This is why the second statement is also false .
If he believed in the Venezuela model , his variation certainly couldn ’ t have a better outcome .
Considering he ’ s wanting to install it in a country as large and powerful as America , the detrimental effects would be felt worldwide .
Undaunted , the hyper-leftists who support Sanders as well as many who support Senator Elizabeth Warren ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that this time it will be different .
They want us all to trust their plans to open the borders , offer “ free ” healthcare to everyone , and fundamentally change all societies by installing the Green New Deal in America .
And as I noted earlier , they ’ re doing so using strategies from the Fabian Society .
It ’ s very telling that the society ’ s two prominent allegories are “ the tortoise and the hare ” and “ a wolf in sheep ’ s clothing.
” They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ form of government and acting behind the facade of wanting to help the people .
Invariably , such ideologies do not allow for the relinquishing of power .
Once socialism is invoked , there will be no going back without a major fight .
Our EIC noted a quote from Orwell that perfectly encapsulates what Democratic Socialists are trying to accomplish today : What George Orwell feared about his beloved socialism was that it was established by a leftist elite who used it to control the masses .
They went so far as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who wasn ’ t pulling their weight .
Bernie ’ s plan isn ’ t very different .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
There are a couple of nasty myths floating around American political circles. They have intensified as we near the 2020 election because one of President Trump’s potential opponents is Senator Bernie Sanders. The myths are these: Socialism has never properly been tried and Sanders has a version of it that can work.
“The truth is that, to many people calling themselves Socialists, revolution does not mean a movement of the masses with which they hope to associate themselves; it means a set of reforms which ‘we’, the clever ones, are going to impose upon ‘them’, the Lower Orders.” – George Orwell
Both of these concepts are false. It has been tried. Over and over again, we see nations take the necessary steps to install a proper socialist government, only to have their efforts fail miserably for the people while still allowing the elites to retain power. We can see this on clear display with Venezuela, which Sanders once promoted as the proper model. This is why the second statement is also false. If he believed in the Venezuela model, his variation certainly couldn’t have a better outcome. Considering he’s wanting to install it in a country as large and powerful as America, the detrimental effects would be felt worldwide.
Undaunted, the hyper-leftists who support Sanders as well as many who support Senator Elizabeth Warren’s bid continue to try to convince Americans that this time it will be different. They want us all to trust their plans to open the borders, offer “free” healthcare to everyone, and fundamentally change all societies by installing the Green New Deal in America. And as I noted earlier, they’re doing so using strategies from the Fabian Society. It’s very telling that the society’s two prominent allegories are “the tortoise and the hare” and “a wolf in sheep’s clothing.” They believe in the steady destruction of our form of government and acting behind the facade of wanting to help the people. Invariably, such ideologies do not allow for the relinquishing of power. Once socialism is invoked, there will be no going back without a major fight.
Our EIC noted a quote from Orwell that perfectly encapsulates what Democratic Socialists are trying to accomplish today:
"The truth is that, to many people calling themselves Socialists, revolution does not mean a movement of the masses with which they hope to associate themselves; it means a set of reforms which 'we', the clever ones, are going to impose upon 'them', the Lower Orders." – G. Orwell — JD Rucker (@JDRucker) January 18, 2020
What George Orwell feared about his beloved socialism was that it was established by a leftist elite who used it to control the masses. They went so far as to call for the execution of anyone who wasn’t pulling their weight. Bernie’s plan isn’t very different.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--How Fabian socialism explains modern day American socialism

There is a small political organization in Great Britain that still wears the name “ Fabian Society , ” and while they almost certainly echo much of what Democratic Socialists in America say , we ’ re less concerned about their influence in America than we are about the original Fabian Society .
Their tactics of slow , methodical subverting of government control to establish a socialist society is very similar to what we ’ re seeing used in the United States today .
George Bernard Shaw , H. G. Wells , and Annie Besant were just some of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the tortoise and the hare approach to change ; rather than initiating quick and often violent revolutions , they wore away at the enemy in an effort to establish changes over extended periods of time .
Their name came from Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus , a Roman general made famous for his use of guerrilla warfare to slowly wear down superior forces instead of fighting in quick , large-scale battles .
And therein lies the methodology behind the current socialist push for cultural Marxism , open borders , and other radical progressive ideologies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the speed in which information travels today .
Thanks in large part to the internet , they ’ re able to play it “ slow ” much more rapidly than their predecessors .
Changes can are being made in years instead of decades or centuries because mobilization is much easier .
It is still the same strategy of methodical , incremental changes , just sped up .
George Orwell , a socialist , became disenchanted with the philosophies of Fabians .
What he saw coming from academic circles didn ’ t match his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would work for the people against the elite .
In essence , he believed the Fabians were not taking down the elites .
They were simply supplanting them with their on elites to continue to oppress the people from a different angle .
He would likely feel the same way about Democratic Socialists today .
In this video by Truthstream Media , Aaron and Melissa explore the roots of the Fabian Society and the collectivist , authoritarian policies they promoted .
Socialism in America did not start with Bernie Sanders .
It has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ century and has been prominent among the masses at various times over the decades .
But today ’ s iteration is the most bold and widespread that we ’ ve seen so far .
And while Sanders and his followers claim to be starting a political revolution , they ’ re still employing the slow-burn mentality of the Fabian Society .
It is often called “ creeping socialism ” in America , but that ’ s not quite accurate .
It ’ s slow , but “ creeping ” implies they ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s not the case .
Many radical progressives are shoving socialism down our throats any way they can , drawing others out of the shadows to join their destructive movement .
Like the Fabians , modern American socialists know they can spread their message best by donning sheep ’ s clothing and hiding their wolfish features .
And guess who follows these wolves in sheep ’ s clothing ?
The sheep .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
There is a small political organization in Great Britain that still wears the name “Fabian Society,” and while they almost certainly echo much of what Democratic Socialists in America say, we’re less concerned about their influence in America than we are about the original Fabian Society. Their tactics of slow, methodical subverting of government control to establish a socialist society is very similar to what we’re seeing used in the United States today.
George Bernard Shaw, H. G. Wells, and Annie Besant were just some of the prominent members of society. They employed the tortoise and the hare approach to change; rather than initiating quick and often violent revolutions, they wore away at the enemy in an effort to establish changes over extended periods of time. Their name came from Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, a Roman general made famous for his use of guerrilla warfare to slowly wear down superior forces instead of fighting in quick, large-scale battles.
And therein lies the methodology behind the current socialist push for cultural Marxism, open borders, and other radical progressive ideologies and policies. The only difference is the speed in which information travels today. Thanks in large part to the internet, they’re able to play it “slow” much more rapidly than their predecessors. Changes can are being made in years instead of decades or centuries because mobilization is much easier. It is still the same strategy of methodical, incremental changes, just sped up.
George Orwell, a socialist, became disenchanted with the philosophies of Fabians. What he saw coming from academic circles didn’t match his purist view of Marxism that he thought would work for the people against the elite. In essence, he believed the Fabians were not taking down the elites. They were simply supplanting them with their on elites to continue to oppress the people from a different angle. He would likely feel the same way about Democratic Socialists today.
"The truth is that, to many people calling themselves Socialists, revolution does not mean a movement of the masses with which they hope to associate themselves; it means a set of reforms which 'we', the clever ones, are going to impose upon 'them', the Lower Orders." – G. Orwell — JD Rucker (@JDRucker) January 18, 2020
In this video by Truthstream Media, Aaron and Melissa explore the roots of the Fabian Society and the collectivist, authoritarian policies they promoted.
Socialism in America did not start with Bernie Sanders. It has been around since at least the 19th century and has been prominent among the masses at various times over the decades. But today’s iteration is the most bold and widespread that we’ve seen so far. And while Sanders and his followers claim to be starting a political revolution, they’re still employing the slow-burn mentality of the Fabian Society.
It is often called “creeping socialism” in America, but that’s not quite accurate. It’s slow, but “creeping” implies they’re being stealthy with their actions. That’s not the case. Many radical progressives are shoving socialism down our throats any way they can, drawing others out of the shadows to join their destructive movement.
Like the Fabians, modern American socialists know they can spread their message best by donning sheep’s clothing and hiding their wolfish features. And guess who follows these wolves in sheep’s clothing? The sheep.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--Jeremiah 6:23 and gun control

Jeremiah 6:23 and gun control

This is in continuation of my reflections on my reading of Jeremiah , a book God has put on my heart to read .
And there was a verse that stood out as very relevant to today ’ s political climate .
Granted , it ’ s relevant in that America is a fallen culture that worsens daily , so it seems .
Jeremiah 6:23 , in context , shows that gun control is a tool of oppression .
Jeremiah 6 begins by prophesying the coming Chaldeans ( Babylonians ) .
Jerusalem shall be put to siege .
A destructive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a people is coming from the north land , And a great nation will be aroused from the remote parts of the earth .
They are cruel and have no mercy ; Their voice roars like the sea , Arrayed as a man for the battle Against you , O daughter of Zion !
” 24We have heard the report of it ; Pain as of a woman in childbirth .
25Do not go out into the field And do not walk on the road , For the enemy has a sword , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ able to defend themselves .
Their peasant weapons will be seized ( bow and spears ) while the Chaldeans will be mounted on horseback bearing swords .
Thus , God ’ s rebellious people are outmatched .
But this is because they have rejected their all-powerful God .
A proper reading of David and Goliath would show that Goliath was the real underdog and got trounced accordingly because God always covers the spread .
Now , the people of Israel and Judah are condemned for many things , but keeping weapons is not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ God .
It ’ s almost assumed that the rabble would keep bows and spears .
Thus having these arms removed denotes a major tyrannical presence .
It precedes the statement that “ they are cruel and without mercy.
” A pressing danger or tragedy is all the more reason to keep and bear arms .
In this passage the arms of the people will be confiscated and the land will be made untraversable for lack of safety .
While one is not necessarily the cause of the other , confiscation would make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ modern day this push for gun confiscation that will only worsen the problem because most mass shootings happen in gun free zones .
We recently saw a church shooting put down in seconds by armed congregants in Texas .
And while this passage does not prophesy that all civilian disarming measures will result in a lack of safety , this passage strongly ties it to tyranny which is a historically strong association .
I do not want to make too many more claims about what this passage says with regards to gun control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and tyranny is a truth worthy of standing on its own without embellishing on the commentary .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
This is in continuation of my reflections on my reading of Jeremiah, a book God has put on my heart to read. And there was a verse that stood out as very relevant to today’s political climate. Granted, it’s relevant in that America is a fallen culture that worsens daily, so it seems. Jeremiah 6:23, in context, shows that gun control is a tool of oppression.
Jeremiah 6 begins by prophesying the coming Chaldeans (Babylonians). Jerusalem shall be put to siege. A destructive war is nigh.
22Thus says the Lord, “Behold, a people is coming from the north land, And a great nation will be aroused from the remote parts of the earth. 23They seize bow and spear; They are cruel and have no mercy; Their voice roars like the sea, And they ride on horses, Arrayed as a man for the battle Against you, O daughter of Zion!” 24We have heard the report of it; Our hands are limp. Anguish has seized us, Pain as of a woman in childbirth. 25Do not go out into the field And do not walk on the road, For the enemy has a sword, Terror is on every side.
The people of Jerusalem will not be able to defend themselves. Their peasant weapons will be seized (bow and spears) while the Chaldeans will be mounted on horseback bearing swords. Thus, God’s rebellious people are outmatched. But this is because they have rejected their all-powerful God. A proper reading of David and Goliath would show that Goliath was the real underdog and got trounced accordingly because God always covers the spread.
Now, the people of Israel and Judah are condemned for many things, but keeping weapons is not seen as an idol or otherwise rejecting God. It’s almost assumed that the rabble would keep bows and spears. Thus having these arms removed denotes a major tyrannical presence. It precedes the statement that “they are cruel and without mercy.”
Modern Application
A pressing danger or tragedy is all the more reason to keep and bear arms. In this passage the arms of the people will be confiscated and the land will be made untraversable for lack of safety. While one is not necessarily the cause of the other, confiscation would make this disaster worse.
We see in modern day this push for gun confiscation that will only worsen the problem because most mass shootings happen in gun free zones. We recently saw a church shooting put down in seconds by armed congregants in Texas.
And while this passage does not prophesy that all civilian disarming measures will result in a lack of safety, this passage strongly ties it to tyranny which is a historically strong association.
I do not want to make too many more claims about what this passage says with regards to gun control because the established strong connection of confiscation and tyranny is a truth worthy of standing on its own without embellishing on the commentary.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--Is Andrew Peek, the NSC’s top Russia expert, the latest Deep State conspirator?

The leading expert on Russia for the National Security Council was escorted off White House grounds and placed on leave yesterday .
Reports indicate he ’ s now under a security investigation just two months into the job .
Andrew Peek , a former Army Intelligence Officer who served in Afghanistan , was the third top Russia expert to leave the position in recent months .
His predecessor , Tim Morrison , left the position after testifying in the House impeachment inquiry .
Morrison replaced Fiona Hill , who also testified before the House Intelligence Committee .
Peek had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Davos , Switzerland next week , where President Trump is expected to meet with a number of world leaders as the impeachment trial takes place back in the Senate .
Peek declined to comment .
White House and National Security Council officials declined to discuss the situation .
“ We do not discuss personnel matters , ” the NSC said in a statement to Axios .
It ’ s a sensitive issue for the White House as the impeachment trial is set to begin in the Senate on Tuesday .
Speculation has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for alleged security violations , it ’ s possible Peek was sending information to Democrats to use in the trial , following the trend of his predecessors working against the President to help Democrats impeach him .
Much has been discussed about the “ Deep State ” – the cabal of entrenched members of the intelligence and federal law enforcement communities who direct foreign relations behind the scenes – as being directly involved in trying to take down President Trump since the 2016 election .
Shadowy figures like alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ viewed as ground level operatives who have been participating in subverting President Trump ’ s administration since it began .
Is Andrew Peek the latest Deep State “ hero ” working against America ?
With no comments from either side and no reports of what he allegedly did to get kicked out so unceremoniously , all we can do is speculate .
But the timing and circumstances seem to indicate there is a good chance he is involved with the debacle that ’ s unfolding .
There ’ s only so much one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eyes of the White House in only two months , and leaking information to the President ’ s opposition is one of them .
We will likely hear more about Andrew Peek in the days or weeks ahead .
The forceful eviction of the top Russia expert at the NSC does not sneak by unnoticed .
If we hear nothing at all , that could mean that whatever he did is even worse than we think .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
The leading expert on Russia for the National Security Council was escorted off White House grounds and placed on leave yesterday. Reports indicate he’s now under a security investigation just two months into the job.
Andrew Peek, a former Army Intelligence Officer who served in Afghanistan, was the third top Russia expert to leave the position in recent months. His predecessor, Tim Morrison, left the position after testifying in the House impeachment inquiry. Morrison replaced Fiona Hill, who also testified before the House Intelligence Committee.
NSC official on leave pending investigation Peek had been expected to attend the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland next week, where President Trump is expected to meet with a number of world leaders as the impeachment trial takes place back in the Senate. Peek declined to comment. White House and National Security Council officials declined to discuss the situation. “We do not discuss personnel matters,” the NSC said in a statement to Axios.
It’s a sensitive issue for the White House as the impeachment trial is set to begin in the Senate on Tuesday. Speculation has been circulating that based on his leave for alleged security violations, it’s possible Peek was sending information to Democrats to use in the trial, following the trend of his predecessors working against the President to help Democrats impeach him.
Much has been discussed about the “Deep State” – the cabal of entrenched members of the intelligence and federal law enforcement communities who direct foreign relations behind the scenes – as being directly involved in trying to take down President Trump since the 2016 election. Shadowy figures like alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella and former FBI agent Peter Stzrok have been viewed as ground level operatives who have been participating in subverting President Trump’s administration since it began.
Is Andrew Peek the latest Deep State “hero” working against America? With no comments from either side and no reports of what he allegedly did to get kicked out so unceremoniously, all we can do is speculate. But the timing and circumstances seem to indicate there is a good chance he is involved with the debacle that’s unfolding. There’s only so much one can do to discredit themselves in the eyes of the White House in only two months, and leaking information to the President’s opposition is one of them.
We will likely hear more about Andrew Peek in the days or weeks ahead. The forceful eviction of the top Russia expert at the NSC does not sneak by unnoticed. If we hear nothing at all, that could mean that whatever he did is even worse than we think.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--Huge migrant caravan blocked by Mexico

Huge migrant caravan blocked by Mexico

The best way to secure the border and prevent illegal immigrants from Central America from crossing over is to keep them from reaching the border in the first place .
Such is the case with a large migrant caravan estimated between 2000-3000 people coming up from Guatemala .
Most of them didn ’ t make it past the southern border .
MEXICO ’ s southern border .
Mexico blocks 2,500 migrants from crossing at Guatemala entry point , authorities say Mexican officials on Saturday closed a section of their border with Guatemala following a push by thousands of migrants to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Suchiate River between the two countries .
About 2,500 migrants of all ages were held up and prevented from crossing or entering the bridge at Mexico ’ s southern border by Mexican National Guardsmen , Guatemalan authorities estimated , according to The Associated Press .
Mexican authorities reportedly allowed several dozen migrants to enter into Mexico in groups of 20 but warned them against trying to slip away to avoid immigration processing .
Mexico ’ s National Migration Institute said on Twitter that it had shored up points along the southern border @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regular immigration.
” Immigrants found crossing the border into the United States illegally can only apply for asylum if they can demonstrate they applied for and were rejected by Mexico .
Otherwise , they ’ re sent back immediately .
This has curtailed the border crisis in recent months , but people who are part of the latest surge seems willing to take their chances .
Meanwhile , construction of the southern border wall has been proceeding with the administration hoping to have 500 miles of new border wall built before the election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issue for more than just the President as the GOP hopes obstruction of wall construction by Democrats will help Republicans win back control of the House of Representatives .
Mexico said repeatedly that they wouldn ’ t pay for the wall .
But as long as they continue stopping illegal immigrants from reaching the border , one can argue they ’ re paying for the wall anyway… by becoming the wall itself .
Not bad , Mr. President .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
The best way to secure the border and prevent illegal immigrants from Central America from crossing over is to keep them from reaching the border in the first place. Such is the case with a large migrant caravan estimated between 2000-3000 people coming up from Guatemala.
Most of them didn’t make it past the southern border. MEXICO’s southern border.
Mexico blocks 2,500 migrants from crossing at Guatemala entry point, authorities say Mexican officials on Saturday closed a section of their border with Guatemala following a push by thousands of migrants to make their way across a bridge over the Suchiate River between the two countries. About 2,500 migrants of all ages were held up and prevented from crossing or entering the bridge at Mexico’s southern border by Mexican National Guardsmen, Guatemalan authorities estimated, according to The Associated Press. Mexican authorities reportedly allowed several dozen migrants to enter into Mexico in groups of 20 but warned them against trying to slip away to avoid immigration processing. Mexico’s National Migration Institute said on Twitter that it had shored up points along the southern border to assure “safe, orderly and regular immigration.”
Immigrants found crossing the border into the United States illegally can only apply for asylum if they can demonstrate they applied for and were rejected by Mexico. Otherwise, they’re sent back immediately. This has curtailed the border crisis in recent months, but people who are part of the latest surge seems willing to take their chances.
Meanwhile, construction of the southern border wall has been proceeding with the administration hoping to have 500 miles of new border wall built before the election. It could turn into an election issue for more than just the President as the GOP hopes obstruction of wall construction by Democrats will help Republicans win back control of the House of Representatives.
Mexico said repeatedly that they wouldn’t pay for the wall. But as long as they continue stopping illegal immigrants from reaching the border, one can argue they’re paying for the wall anyway… by becoming the wall itself. Not bad, Mr. President.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--It’s Democrats’ media control versus the President’s television showmanship

As the impeachment trial in the Senate gears up to start on Tuesday , both sides are sharpening their best tools for battle .
For the Democrats , that means coordinating with mainstream media in an effort to position their narratives for maximum headline potential .
They ’ re already feeding talking points to a willing press , one who will play a major role in determining how America views the proceedings .
President Trump is doing what he did best before becoming President .
He ’ s preparing to entertain an audience of American viewers who will make their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ merit .
He applied his showmanship in the selection of his defense team , inserting legal ( and television ) veterans Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr to help deliver the message of innocence .
Both are Fox News contributors .
Both have appeared in high-profile cases that required their arguments to be made to a larger audience than the courtroom .
And both have the flare necessary to generate moments that can be viewed over-and-over again on the internet even if mainstream media fails to air their zingers .
We can expect the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out videos of some of the best clips .
This isn ’ t really a trial intended to sway the views of most Senators .
Both sides are targeting voters .
Democrats want to convince as many as possible that the President is unworthy for reelection while the President ’ s team wants to deliver the message that this impeachment should never have existed in the first place .
It ’ ll be a test of the reach of network news , CNN , MSNBC , and news outlets like the NY Times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ high-reach right-leaning outlets like Fox News , OANN , and independent online news outlets ( like NOQ Report ) .
Democrats have the advantage on reach .
Even though Fox News is the most watched cable news network , its pro-Trump coverage will be less watched than the combined anti-Trump coverage of the networks and the other two cable news networks .
There will also be a dramatic gap between the quantity and reach of anti-Trump articles versus pro-Trump posts .
But where the President has the advantage is in the replay factor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ help echo the clips the President and his campaign collect as his “ made-for-TV ” legal team attempts to make mundane legal points as entertaining as possible .
This impeachment trial is 100 % about November .
Echo chambers on both sides will make their case about the election while pretending they ’ re talking about impeachment .
Thankfully , the President has the truth on his side .
But he still needs our help .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
As the impeachment trial in the Senate gears up to start on Tuesday, both sides are sharpening their best tools for battle. For the Democrats, that means coordinating with mainstream media in an effort to position their narratives for maximum headline potential. They’re already feeding talking points to a willing press, one who will play a major role in determining how America views the proceedings.
President Trump is doing what he did best before becoming President. He’s preparing to entertain an audience of American viewers who will make their decisions based on presentation as much as merit. He applied his showmanship in the selection of his defense team, inserting legal (and television) veterans Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr to help deliver the message of innocence.
Both are Fox News contributors. Both have appeared in high-profile cases that required their arguments to be made to a larger audience than the courtroom. And both have the flare necessary to generate moments that can be viewed over-and-over again on the internet even if mainstream media fails to air their zingers. We can expect the President to do his part by Tweeting out videos of some of the best clips.
This isn’t really a trial intended to sway the views of most Senators. Both sides are targeting voters. Democrats want to convince as many as possible that the President is unworthy for reelection while the President’s team wants to deliver the message that this impeachment should never have existed in the first place. It’ll be a test of the reach of network news, CNN, MSNBC, and news outlets like the NY Times and Washington Post versus a handful of high-reach right-leaning outlets like Fox News, OANN, and independent online news outlets (like NOQ Report).
Democrats have the advantage on reach. Even though Fox News is the most watched cable news network, its pro-Trump coverage will be less watched than the combined anti-Trump coverage of the networks and the other two cable news networks. There will also be a dramatic gap between the quantity and reach of anti-Trump articles versus pro-Trump posts. But where the President has the advantage is in the replay factor. His army of digital warriors will help echo the clips the President and his campaign collect as his “made-for-TV” legal team attempts to make mundane legal points as entertaining as possible.
This impeachment trial is 100% about November. Echo chambers on both sides will make their case about the election while pretending they’re talking about impeachment. Thankfully, the President has the truth on his side. But he still needs our help.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--Elizabeth Warren: ‘How could the American people want someone who lies to them?’

Every election cycle , at least one candidate emerges who demonstrates an uncanny willingness to outright lie .
One can argue that all successful politicians are inherently liars , but people like Al Gore , Hillary Clinton , and Elizabeth Warren take their dishonesty to the next level and beyond .
Warren took a question from the press that , intentionally or not , highlighted the growing reputation the Senator has of lying .
Whether it ’ s her heritage , her children ’ s schooling , why she left a job , or how she ’ s going to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ caught in multiple lies since launching her candidacy .
“ Is it disqualifying for a presidential candidate to lie to the American public on anything ?
” a reporter asked .
As everyone turned back to Warren , it was clear she wanted to answer the question as carefully as possible .
Thus , she used her standard generalization technique instead of giving a plain yes or no answer .
“ Uh… I would think that it… you know… how could the American people wants someone who lies to them ?
” she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s words a de facto admission that voters shouldn ’ t be considering her for office , whether as a Senator or in the highest office in the land ?
Either she ’ s just a hypocrite or she lacks self-awareness completely .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Every election cycle, at least one candidate emerges who demonstrates an uncanny willingness to outright lie. One can argue that all successful politicians are inherently liars, but people like Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, and Elizabeth Warren take their dishonesty to the next level and beyond.
Warren took a question from the press that, intentionally or not, highlighted the growing reputation the Senator has of lying. Whether it’s her heritage, her children’s schooling, why she left a job, or how she’s going to pay for Medicare-for-All, Warren has been caught in multiple lies since launching her candidacy.
The hypocrisy here is off the freaking charts. https://t.co/dabLTpsClV — The ? FOO (@PolitiBunny) January 19, 2020
“Is it disqualifying for a presidential candidate to lie to the American public on anything?” a reporter asked.
As everyone turned back to Warren, it was clear she wanted to answer the question as carefully as possible. Thus, she used her standard generalization technique instead of giving a plain yes or no answer.
“Uh… I would think that it… you know… how could the American people wants someone who lies to them?” she replied.
Can we call Warren’s words a de facto admission that voters shouldn’t be considering her for office, whether as a Senator or in the highest office in the land? Either she’s just a hypocrite or she lacks self-awareness completely.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--4 things that must not happen at Virginia’s Lobby Day gun owners’ rights rally

The eyes of the nation will be turned to Richmond , Virginia , on Monday as the annual Lobby Day gathering organized by Virginia Citizens Defense League is set to be exponentially bigger than normal .
Draconian gun control laws proposed by the new Democratic legislative majority and pushed by Governor Ralph Northam have prompted multiple gun owners ’ rights advocacy groups in and out of the state to converge on Richmond in full force .
“ Starting early at 8 am , many will be going in to main halls of the Capitol buildings to lobby Virginia legislators , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Mom-at-Arms and Virginia chapter lead for 1 Million Moms Against Gun Control .
“ From what I understand there are others who will be going in earlier than that .
Around 11 am a protest rally will start.
” Last week , Governor Northam announced a state of emergency that included a weapons ban for Capitol Square during the event .
2nd Amendment activist groups and VCDL challenged the ban , but the state supreme court ruled the Governor ’ s actions were constitutional on Friday .
The Capitol Building itself has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Northam indicated last week he ’ d received credible reports that militant groups , including white supremacist organizations , planned to attend the rally and spark violence that may include an armed assault of the Capitol Building .
Three white supremacist members of a group called “ The Base ” were arrested last week after Northam expressed his concerns .
With tens of thousands of people expected to attend , exposure for the event offers an opportunity to send a very clear message to not only the Virginia legislature but also gun control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are risks .
Media will be covering the event heavily , and much of the coverage will be dedicated to spinning the event into as negative of a light as possible .
It ’ s imperative that certain things not happen to prevent a positive show of activism that turns into a negative subject as fodder for Democrats ’ talking points and mainstream media propaganda .
Here are four things that must not happen : Radical progressives are certain that any time a group of “ gun nuts ” get together in large @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be violence .
They will point at the Charlottesville incident at the Unite The Right rally in 2017 , during which there were many physical altercations .
White supremacist James Alex Fields Jr drove through a crowd of counter-protesters , killing Heather D. Heyer and injuring 19 others .
Nothing like that can happen at this rally .
The potential to defuse the left ’ s narrative disappears the moment things turn violent .
It needs to be a peaceful , legal gathering of patriotic defenders of the Constitution who are invoking our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Amendment .
There may be a time in the future when we need to defend the 2nd Amendment by invoking the 2nd Amendment , but that time has not come yet .
If we are stalwart in our use of the 1st Amendment , we may never need to face an oppressive government bent on subverting the 2nd .
Of the four things that must not happen , this is the one that may seem counter-intuitive .
After all , we noted last month how Virginia is a bellwether for the nation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ definitely need to keep associating the national message of fighting Democrats with what ’ s happening in Virginia .
But Lobby Day is not the right venue .
This must be a glorious expression of limited-government federalism as citizens of a state that is currently in crisis sort out this mess by expressing the will of the people .
Gun owners ’ rights are a local , state , and national issue , but Lobby Day should be squarely focused on the state of Virginia .
“ When we moved to Virginia in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ d end up in the middle of a Constitutional fight like this , but here I am , almost like I was meant to be here , ” said Sam Janney , Editor at Twitchy .
“ And I can ’ t think of a more important place to be than shoulder-to-shoulder standing with other Virginians defending our inherent right to bear arms.
” In the aftermath of the event , attention can be turned again to the national debate and taken up by the rest of the nation , but this is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must remain on defending their rights .
Don ’ t worry .
The Trump campaign will make sure to invoke Virginia as a microcosm of America and a warning against the obtuse policies Democrats want to impose on us all .
Just as there are times when a state message must supersede the national message , so too are there times when the argument must focus on the Constitution instead of intellectual perspectives .
This is such a time .
Gun owners ’ rights advocates often use facts to fight gun control because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But for Lobby Day , the attention and messaging must cut to the heart of the matter .
We have a right to keep and bear arms .
Virginia ’ s Democrats want to systematically take that right away .
For this event , we need only one reason to object to what Democrats there are trying to do : Because the Constitution says we must .
“ The major difference in those who push gun control and those of us who value liberty is that gun control activists give fear power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by it , they push it onto everyone else , ” said McDaniel .
“ Misery loves company .
Those of us who love our liberties and freedoms as Americans choose to be empowered and not let fear overcome us.
” It ’ s fortunate that this event falls on Martin Luther King Jr. Day .
Just as he fought for rights , so too are Virginia patriots fighting for their rights .
Besides , many people are off that day , allowing for the event to swell even more than it would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But there ’ s also a risk .
White supremacist groups are allegedly converging on the event .
While many of them are also gun owners ’ rights advocates , the core of their messaging is often associated with bigotry , and this messaging must not be attached to the point of the event .
There is no way to stop them from co-opting the event to spread their hateful message if they choose to do so ; we can not pick and choose which opinions are put on display .
Nevertheless , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will become the centerpiece of their reporting on the event .
If this can be avoided without infringing on anyone ’ s 1st Amendment right , that would be ideal .
There is also the risk of radical progressive plants pretending to be conservative activists .
Again , there ’ s not much that can be done to stop them other than making our righteous messaging in defense of the Constitution louder and much more visible .
Patriots must stay the course and put forth proper messaging that remains on point .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ optics that some groups may intend to inject into the event .
The Virginia rally can be the launching point for gun owners ’ rights advocacy across the nation as the citizens of the state rightly defend the Constitution .
Challenges must be faced .
Risks must be mitigated .
The 2nd Amendment must be protected .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
The eyes of the nation will be turned to Richmond, Virginia, on Monday as the annual Lobby Day gathering organized by Virginia Citizens Defense League is set to be exponentially bigger than normal. Draconian gun control laws proposed by the new Democratic legislative majority and pushed by Governor Ralph Northam have prompted multiple gun owners’ rights advocacy groups in and out of the state to converge on Richmond in full force.
“Starting early at 8 am, many will be going in to main halls of the Capitol buildings to lobby Virginia legislators,” said Jill S. McDaniel, founder of Mom-at-Arms and Virginia chapter lead for 1 Million Moms Against Gun Control. “From what I understand there are others who will be going in earlier than that. Around 11 am a protest rally will start.”
Last week, Governor Northam announced a state of emergency that included a weapons ban for Capitol Square during the event. 2nd Amendment activist groups and VCDL challenged the ban, but the state supreme court ruled the Governor’s actions were constitutional on Friday. The Capitol Building itself has a permanent gun ban in place.
Northam indicated last week he’d received credible reports that militant groups, including white supremacist organizations, planned to attend the rally and spark violence that may include an armed assault of the Capitol Building. Three white supremacist members of a group called “The Base” were arrested last week after Northam expressed his concerns.
With tens of thousands of people expected to attend, exposure for the event offers an opportunity to send a very clear message to not only the Virginia legislature but also gun control advocates around the country. But there are risks. Media will be covering the event heavily, and much of the coverage will be dedicated to spinning the event into as negative of a light as possible. It’s imperative that certain things not happen to prevent a positive show of activism that turns into a negative subject as fodder for Democrats’ talking points and mainstream media propaganda. Here are four things that must not happen:
Violence
Radical progressives are certain that any time a group of “gun nuts” get together in large enough force, there is certain to be violence. They will point at the Charlottesville incident at the Unite The Right rally in 2017, during which there were many physical altercations. White supremacist James Alex Fields Jr drove through a crowd of counter-protesters, killing Heather D. Heyer and injuring 19 others.
Nothing like that can happen at this rally. The potential to defuse the left’s narrative disappears the moment things turn violent. It needs to be a peaceful, legal gathering of patriotic defenders of the Constitution who are invoking our 1st Amendment right to defend the 2nd Amendment.
There may be a time in the future when we need to defend the 2nd Amendment by invoking the 2nd Amendment, but that time has not come yet. If we are stalwart in our use of the 1st Amendment, we may never need to face an oppressive government bent on subverting the 2nd.
Nationalizing a state issue
Of the four things that must not happen, this is the one that may seem counter-intuitive. After all, we noted last month how Virginia is a bellwether for the nation. That hasn’t changed and we definitely need to keep associating the national message of fighting Democrats with what’s happening in Virginia. But Lobby Day is not the right venue. This must be a glorious expression of limited-government federalism as citizens of a state that is currently in crisis sort out this mess by expressing the will of the people. Gun owners’ rights are a local, state, and national issue, but Lobby Day should be squarely focused on the state of Virginia.
“When we moved to Virginia in 2016, I never thought I’d end up in the middle of a Constitutional fight like this, but here I am, almost like I was meant to be here,” said Sam Janney, Editor at Twitchy. “And I can’t think of a more important place to be than shoulder-to-shoulder standing with other Virginians defending our inherent right to bear arms.”
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.
In the aftermath of the event, attention can be turned again to the national debate and taken up by the rest of the nation, but this is Virginia’s day. The focus must remain on defending their rights. Don’t worry. The Trump campaign will make sure to invoke Virginia as a microcosm of America and a warning against the obtuse policies Democrats want to impose on us all.
Your 2nd Amendment is under very serious attack in the Great Commonwealth of Virginia. That’s what happens when you vote for Democrats, they will take your guns away. Republicans will win Virginia in 2020. Thank you Dems! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 17, 2020
Non-Constitutional messaging
Just as there are times when a state message must supersede the national message, so too are there times when the argument must focus on the Constitution instead of intellectual perspectives. This is such a time. Gun owners’ rights advocates often use facts to fight gun control because conservatives have the truth on our side. But for Lobby Day, the attention and messaging must cut to the heart of the matter. We have a right to keep and bear arms. Virginia’s Democrats want to systematically take that right away. For this event, we need only one reason to object to what Democrats there are trying to do: Because the Constitution says we must.
“The major difference in those who push gun control and those of us who value liberty is that gun control activists give fear power over them and because they are oppressed by it, they push it onto everyone else,” said McDaniel. “Misery loves company. Those of us who love our liberties and freedoms as Americans choose to be empowered and not let fear overcome us.”
Bad optics from white supremacists
It’s fortunate that this event falls on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Just as he fought for rights, so too are Virginia patriots fighting for their rights. Besides, many people are off that day, allowing for the event to swell even more than it would have if not for the holiday.
But there’s also a risk. White supremacist groups are allegedly converging on the event. While many of them are also gun owners’ rights advocates, the core of their messaging is often associated with bigotry, and this messaging must not be attached to the point of the event. There is no way to stop them from co-opting the event to spread their hateful message if they choose to do so; we cannot pick and choose which opinions are put on display. Nevertheless, the first racist sign mainstream media finds will become the centerpiece of their reporting on the event. If this can be avoided without infringing on anyone’s 1st Amendment right, that would be ideal.
There is also the risk of radical progressive plants pretending to be conservative activists. Again, there’s not much that can be done to stop them other than making our righteous messaging in defense of the Constitution louder and much more visible.
Patriots must stay the course and put forth proper messaging that remains on point. We must turn attention away from the bad optics that some groups may intend to inject into the event.
The Virginia rally can be the launching point for gun owners’ rights advocacy across the nation as the citizens of the state rightly defend the Constitution. Challenges must be faced. Risks must be mitigated. The 2nd Amendment must be protected.
“Nations, states, and central banks are quietly but rapidly shifting their money to precious metals. With bank runs, recession, CBDCs, and worse on the horizon, it’s easy to see why. NOW is the time to learn more about moving portions of your retirement or wealth to a self-directed gold and silver IRA through an America-First, Christian precious metals company.” – JD Rucker (not a financial advisor, just a guy who’s paying attention)
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--Mitt Romney’s popularity among Republicans, Independents in Utah plummets

Senator Mitt Romney feels safe .
He ’ s considered a hero in many circles in Utah where his Mormon beliefs and center-right political ideology shine .
But he ’ s making enemies quickly as he continues to subvert President Trump ’ s agenda and in some cases , even his presidency itself .
The latest episode of Romney playing his NeverTrump role surrounds impeachment in which he seems poised to side with Democrats on key votes .
Many of his former fans are taking note .
Romney loses GOP support in Utah after challenging Trump on impeachment The Morning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 72 , going down after he called for former national security adviser John Bolton to testify at Trump ’ s impeachment trial , which began on Thursday .
The poll shows the senator ’ s approval rating falling among Utah Republicans from September through December 2019 , and independents also shifted to disapproving of Romney over the quarter .
In the prior quarter , 65 % of Utah Republicans supported Romney , and while a majority still do presently , that number sank to 57 % .
On the bright side , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ replace the Republicans and Independents who are scorning him .
He ’ s up 4 % among Utah Democrats .
The impeachment vote in the House went mostly along party lines with a few Democrats voting against it , joining every Republican in Congress .
But in the Senate , there are still people like Romney , Lisa Murkowski , and Susan Collins who may go against the party , the President , and the nation by supporting the Democrats in their ongoing attempt to redo the 2016 election .
But this is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Impeachment is about setting the state for the 2020 election as well .
If Mitt Romney sides with Democrats on this unambiguously political impeachment debacle , it ’ s time for Republicans to renounce him en masse .
He should just register as a Democrat and stop this charade that he ’ s a conscientious conservative .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Senator Mitt Romney feels safe. He’s considered a hero in many circles in Utah where his Mormon beliefs and center-right political ideology shine. But he’s making enemies quickly as he continues to subvert President Trump’s agenda and in some cases, even his presidency itself. The latest episode of Romney playing his NeverTrump role surrounds impeachment in which he seems poised to side with Democrats on key votes.
Many of his former fans are taking note.
Romney loses GOP support in Utah after challenging Trump on impeachment The Morning Consult survey found support for Romney, 72, going down after he called for former national security adviser John Bolton to testify at Trump’s impeachment trial, which began on Thursday. The poll shows the senator’s approval rating falling among Utah Republicans from September through December 2019, and independents also shifted to disapproving of Romney over the quarter. In the prior quarter, 65% of Utah Republicans supported Romney, and while a majority still do presently, that number sank to 57%.
On the bright side, he’s making news friends to partially replace the Republicans and Independents who are scorning him. He’s up 4% among Utah Democrats.
The impeachment vote in the House went mostly along party lines with a few Democrats voting against it, joining every Republican in Congress. But in the Senate, there are still people like Romney, Lisa Murkowski, and Susan Collins who may go against the party, the President, and the nation by supporting the Democrats in their ongoing attempt to redo the 2016 election. But this is more than just replaying a past election. Impeachment is about setting the state for the 2020 election as well.
If Mitt Romney sides with Democrats on this unambiguously political impeachment debacle, it’s time for Republicans to renounce him en masse. He should just register as a Democrat and stop this charade that he’s a conscientious conservative.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--Graham Allen has a reminder for Virginia

Gun control has been a way of life for many of us in progressive states .
I live in California for the weather and I exercise my 2nd Amendment rights “ quietly ” as a result .
That ’ s my choice .
But those who live in states where freedom is still a thing have found it challenging to abide by the leftist push to disarm the masses .
Virginia , the birthplace of American liberty , is one such state as Democrats push to subvert the 2nd Amendment .
Last year ’ s election caught many in Virginia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ excuse for the GOP ’ s inability to stave off the onslaught of anti-gun money being pumped in ahead of the election by the likes of Michael Bloomberg and George Soros , but now that the state has all branches controlled by Democrats , it ’ s time for conservatives to act .
Monday ’ s planned rally at the capital is a start .
One of the messages they need to deliver was expressed by Dear America Podcast host Graham Allen .
Virginia is a bellwether for the nation .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and his cronies that they can not operate against the Constitution without repercussions .
This subtle message from Graham Allen will hopefully remind them .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Gun control has been a way of life for many of us in progressive states. I live in California for the weather and I exercise my 2nd Amendment rights “quietly” as a result. That’s my choice. But those who live in states where freedom is still a thing have found it challenging to abide by the leftist push to disarm the masses. Virginia, the birthplace of American liberty, is one such state as Democrats push to subvert the 2nd Amendment.
Last year’s election caught many in Virginia by surprise. There’s no excuse for the GOP’s inability to stave off the onslaught of anti-gun money being pumped in ahead of the election by the likes of Michael Bloomberg and George Soros, but now that the state has all branches controlled by Democrats, it’s time for conservatives to act. Monday’s planned rally at the capital is a start. One of the messages they need to deliver was expressed by Dear America Podcast host Graham Allen.
BREAKING: Virginia wants to take away our guns…. So did the British, and we haven’t cared what they thought since 1776 ?? RT! #VirginiaRally #Virginia2A — Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen_1) January 19, 2020
Virginia is a bellwether for the nation. It’s imperative that patriots remind Ralph Northam and his cronies that they cannot operate against the Constitution without repercussions. This subtle message from Graham Allen will hopefully remind them.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--Why the ‘Sinner’s Prayer’ is so dangerous

If you ’ ve gone to an evangelical church , you ’ re probably familiar with the “ Sinner ’ s Prayer.
” It ’ s a tactic conceived of around five decades ago during a time when church revivalists were seeking shortcuts to infuse churches in America with more members .
The motives were likely sincere , but the results have been horrendous .
With the Sinner ’ s Prayer , parishioners are asked , usually at the end of a church service , whether anyone wants to be saved .
Those who raise their hand are often brought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will then have them recite a prayer .
There are many variations , but essentially it ’ s supposed to be a five-minute acknowledgement of sin and a request for Jesus Christ to come into their heart .
They are often told to write the date of the event in the back of their Bible to commemorate the occasion and to act as a reminder of the gift they ’ d been given .
In theory , it ’ s a fine technique .
It can even work from time to time when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ starting point for them to explore their faith , read the Bible , and begin a life of prayer and repentance .
But all too often , it ’ s a quickly forgotten moment that not only confuses people about what it means to be a born-again Christian , but may even hamper them from seeking proper acceptance of the Lord .
Evangelist Paul Washer is adamantly against the practice .
He is known for being a “ fire and brimstone ” style Bible teacher whose ministry is spread around the world .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ lukewarm nature of American evangelism and claims the Sinner ’ s Prayer does plenty of damage while rarely doing anything positive for the people who participate in it .
If you want a better understanding of what the Sinner ’ s Prayer really is and why it ’ s so dangerous , watch Paul Washer ’ s video .
It ’ s important for those seeking the truth and desiring to walk with Jesus Christ to understand what really needs to be done .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
If you’ve gone to an evangelical church, you’re probably familiar with the “Sinner’s Prayer.” It’s a tactic conceived of around five decades ago during a time when church revivalists were seeking shortcuts to infuse churches in America with more members. The motives were likely sincere, but the results have been horrendous.
With the Sinner’s Prayer, parishioners are asked, usually at the end of a church service, whether anyone wants to be saved. Those who raise their hand are often brought forward or sent to a counselor who will then have them recite a prayer. There are many variations, but essentially it’s supposed to be a five-minute acknowledgement of sin and a request for Jesus Christ to come into their heart. They are often told to write the date of the event in the back of their Bible to commemorate the occasion and to act as a reminder of the gift they’d been given.
In theory, it’s a fine technique. It can even work from time to time when the subject takes the event as a starting point for them to explore their faith, read the Bible, and begin a life of prayer and repentance. But all too often, it’s a quickly forgotten moment that not only confuses people about what it means to be a born-again Christian, but may even hamper them from seeking proper acceptance of the Lord.
Evangelist Paul Washer is adamantly against the practice. He is known for being a “fire and brimstone” style Bible teacher whose ministry is spread around the world. He is also extremely critical of the lukewarm nature of American evangelism and claims the Sinner’s Prayer does plenty of damage while rarely doing anything positive for the people who participate in it.
If you want a better understanding of what the Sinner’s Prayer really is and why it’s so dangerous, watch Paul Washer’s video. It’s important for those seeking the truth and desiring to walk with Jesus Christ to understand what really needs to be done.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--Why Ilhan Omar should be concerned she’s being investigated

Justice can be slow and mainstream media ’ s coverage of it can be even slower , especially when it pertains to a Democrats .
Representative Ilhan Omar has been subject of so much speculation across independent media over the last two years , I ’ ll admit I assumed last week ’ s report that she ’ s under investigation didn ’ t get me excited .
It seemed , on the surface , to be another lame attempt by an upstart local politician trying to light a fire under a reluctant justice system .
Then I read more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I realized that this time , perhaps , justice may be heading in the right direction against Omar .
This article by David Steinberg breaks it all down very nicely .
Finally .
The Feds — including ICE — appear to be investigating Rep. Ilhan Omar .
Minnesota state Rep. Steve Drazkowski ( R ) had previously filed a complaint on the matter with the Minnesota District of the Department of Justice .
That office — headed by U.S. Attorney Erica MacDonald , a 2018 Donald Trump appointee — directed the FBI to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ formally met with Rep. Drazkowski , and others , in mid-October to receive a prepared file of evidence and related information .
I can confirm that the FBI has taken additional steps since this October meeting .
Unlike past reports from various hopeful conservative news outlets that the walls may be closing in on the freshman Congresswoman , this one seems to be legitimate .
Why ?
Because there ’ s a magic word in the title of that article : ICE .
Unlike the FBI , which often gets embroiled in political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ squarely to Deep State suppression of certain investigations , ICE stands alone .
That ’ s not to say they don ’ t make mistakes or fall victim to manipulation , but they ’ re one of the least corrupted law enforcement agencies in the land .
Moreover , they ’ re no friends of Omar ’ s .
How could they be ?
Omar was one of the first members of Capitol Hill to call for the abolition of ICE altogether .
She does not believe in their mission , nor does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ keep Americans safe .
If there ’ s anyone they , as an organization , would love to bust for immigration wrongdoing , it ’ s Ilhan Omar .
After years of evading investigations and hiding her past , the walls truly might be closing in on Ilhan Omar .
Her hidden history of alleged offenses are still well documented despite her best efforts .
Now , we might finally see justice served against her .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Justice can be slow and mainstream media’s coverage of it can be even slower, especially when it pertains to a Democrats. Representative Ilhan Omar has been subject of so much speculation across independent media over the last two years, I’ll admit I assumed last week’s report that she’s under investigation didn’t get me excited. It seemed, on the surface, to be another lame attempt by an upstart local politician trying to light a fire under a reluctant justice system.
Then I read more about it. That’s when I realized that this time, perhaps, justice may be heading in the right direction against Omar. This article by David Steinberg breaks it all down very nicely.
Finally. The Feds — including ICE — appear to be investigating Rep. Ilhan Omar. Minnesota state Rep. Steve Drazkowski (R) had previously filed a complaint on the matter with the Minnesota District of the Department of Justice. That office — headed by U.S. Attorney Erica MacDonald, a 2018 Donald Trump appointee — directed the FBI to review the complaint. An FBI SAC formally met with Rep. Drazkowski, and others, in mid-October to receive a prepared file of evidence and related information. I can confirm that the FBI has taken additional steps since this October meeting.
Unlike past reports from various hopeful conservative news outlets that the walls may be closing in on the freshman Congresswoman, this one seems to be legitimate. Why? Because there’s a magic word in the title of that article: ICE. Unlike the FBI, which often gets embroiled in political machinations from the left and is attached squarely to Deep State suppression of certain investigations, ICE stands alone. That’s not to say they don’t make mistakes or fall victim to manipulation, but they’re one of the least corrupted law enforcement agencies in the land.
Moreover, they’re no friends of Omar’s. How could they be? Omar was one of the first members of Capitol Hill to call for the abolition of ICE altogether. She does not believe in their mission, nor does she appreciate the work they do to keep Americans safe. If there’s anyone they, as an organization, would love to bust for immigration wrongdoing, it’s Ilhan Omar.
After years of evading investigations and hiding her past, the walls truly might be closing in on Ilhan Omar. Her hidden history of alleged offenses are still well documented despite her best efforts. Now, we might finally see justice served against her.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-19--Obama’s former National Security Advisor, James Jones, says killing of Soleimani ‘absolutely correct

Obama’s former National Security Advisor, James Jones, says killing of Soleimani ‘absolutely correct’

Opposition to President Trump ’ s ordered strike in Baghdad that killed Quds leader Qasem Soleimani has been loud and relatively universal… at least that ’ s the narrative being pushed by mainstream media and most Democrats .
They said opposition was bipartisan after a handful of Republicans voiced concern .
They said it was opposed by the military until flag officers came forward in full support .
They even claimed massive crowds at Soleimani ’ s funeral meant he was “ beloved ” until it was learned Iranian people were forced to attend .
CNN and MSNBC in particular @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on national security who oppose the move .
NY Times and Washington Post have found former military advisers to say Soleimani ’ s death only makes matters worse in the Middle East despite evidence to the contrary .
And none of them have been able to find experts or military advisers to support the President ’ s move .
Apparently , they weren ’ t looking hard enough .
Former President Barack Obama ’ s national security adviser fully supported President Trump ’ s decision to kill top Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the theocratic regime in Tehran .
“ What the administration did in the Soleimani case is absolutely correct , ” Gen. James Jones , 76 , said at the Atlantic Council Global Energy Forum in Abu Dhabi .
“ This was a powerful step .
We ’ ll see where it goes , ” he added .
“ It ’ s a complicated region , but I think history will say that this was the right thing to do.
” A search on Google News reveals the Washington Examiner and NOQ Report were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the observations made by Jones .
This is par for the course ; Jones is not in the public spotlight anymore and made his comments on foreign soil .
Nevertheless , it would have triggered alert feeds for most major news outlets and deserved at least a mention .
But nobody nibbled .
Nobody in progressive media wanted the story out there because it ran contrary to their carefully crafted narrative .
America needs independent outlets like NOQ Report to have the resources necessary to expose counter-narrative news like this , especially in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for donations and we appreciate those that come in , but it ’ s not nearly enough to make a dent in mainstream media ’ s stranglehold and suppression of the truth .
We simply need more .
It ’ s no wonder mainstream media was silent on this story .
Having a former National Security Advisor for President Obama siding with President Trump on the killing of Soleimani would be devastating for their 2020 election agenda .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Opposition to President Trump’s ordered strike in Baghdad that killed Quds leader Qasem Soleimani has been loud and relatively universal… at least that’s the narrative being pushed by mainstream media and most Democrats. They said opposition was bipartisan after a handful of Republicans voiced concern. They said it was opposed by the military until flag officers came forward in full support. They even claimed massive crowds at Soleimani’s funeral meant he was “beloved” until it was learned Iranian people were forced to attend.
CNN and MSNBC in particular have been trotting out “experts” on national security who oppose the move. NY Times and Washington Post have found former military advisers to say Soleimani’s death only makes matters worse in the Middle East despite evidence to the contrary. And none of them have been able to find experts or military advisers to support the President’s move. Apparently, they weren’t looking hard enough.
Obama national security adviser says Trump ‘absolutely correct’ to kill Soleimani Former President Barack Obama’s national security adviser fully supported President Trump’s decision to kill top Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani and floated the “possible collapse” of the theocratic regime in Tehran. “What the administration did in the Soleimani case is absolutely correct,” Gen. James Jones, 76, said at the Atlantic Council Global Energy Forum in Abu Dhabi. “This was a powerful step. We’ll see where it goes,” he added. “It’s a complicated region, but I think history will say that this was the right thing to do.”
A search on Google News reveals the Washington Examiner and NOQ Report were the only two news outlets to cover the observations made by Jones. This is par for the course; Jones is not in the public spotlight anymore and made his comments on foreign soil. Nevertheless, it would have triggered alert feeds for most major news outlets and deserved at least a mention. But nobody nibbled. Nobody in progressive media wanted the story out there because it ran contrary to their carefully crafted narrative.
America needs independent outlets like NOQ Report to have the resources necessary to expose counter-narrative news like this, especially in a crucial election year. We ask for donations and we appreciate those that come in, but it’s not nearly enough to make a dent in mainstream media’s stranglehold and suppression of the truth. We simply need more.
It’s no wonder mainstream media was silent on this story. Having a former National Security Advisor for President Obama siding with President Trump on the killing of Soleimani would be devastating for their 2020 election agenda.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]