noqreport--2020-01-06--Literal Skynet: How China tracks everyone and why we need to prepare

The Orwellian phrase “ Big Brother Is Watching ” has been fodder for conspiracy theorists and dystopian fearmongers for decades .
But it ’ s no longer fiction , at least in China .
The most prolific true surveillance state is in place .
Everything anyone does in public in metro areas is being tracked and recorded .
Many things happening in private are also being tracked and recorded .
And as China officially launches its “ social credit score ” system this year , they will be using this data to keep a firm control over the population .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ social credit score is spreading , even to America The world is reacting , and not in the way freedom-loving Americans would expect .
I ’ ll admit , I was shocked to learn how many nations are watching China closely and starting to mimic their endeavors .
They ’ re installing CCTV cameras every and pushing for biometrics usage in more and more areas .
If that doesn ’ t sound familiar , it ’ s because you ’ re not paying attention .
In the United States , CCTV cameras are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are embracing the biometrics trend .
Currently , it ’ s not nefarious for the most part .
The embrace of these technologies is for practical purposes .
But any technology as powerful as this , with tracking equipment connected to AI and stored in vast databases , can and eventually will be used against the people .
The video above from VICE ’ s Elle Reeve , who is now a correspondent for CNN , explores the surveillance angle of China ’ s plan .
They will soon have over 600 million @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everything .
They already use facial recognition to allow ( and track ) people to come and go from buildings .
They use it to register ( and track ) their food orders at restaurants , making recommendations based on their history .
They even keep tabs on ( and track ) how many sheets of toilet paper people are using in public restrooms .
One of the systems used is called… wait for it… Skynet .
Seriously .
If this sounds like something that could never make it out of China , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ explored around the world at smaller scales as many , particularly Marxists , see a future where everyone is kept safe and in line through government ’ s control of all situations .
Over 3000 suspected criminals have been apprehended through the subway systems alone , a statistic that prompted Dubai to install a similar system in their airports .
The tracking of employees throughout their day , from the moment they enter the building ( don ’ t be late ) to the moment they leave has productivity implications that have many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the list goes on and on .
It couldn ’ t happen in America , right ?
Wrong .
Currently , there is no national or state law that prohibits this type of surveillance .
In fact , drones , police body cameras , and CCTV cameras in many major metros are already feeding into databases for allegedly “ future ” projects to be considered .
A handful of cities have outlawed the practice , but the numbers are growing much slower than the interest the technology is sparking .
With no legislative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truly entering uncharted territory without anything other than wide-open speculation to drive ill-conceived initiatives .
But the real risk in all of this is what will happen in two to five years when results of China ’ s program starts making people say , “ Hmm.
” China ’ s initiative will be “ successful , ” at least on paper .
There will be fewer crimes , less waste , more productivity , more socially conscientious actions , and most importantly more government control among a people who are used to being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we really need to worry as American Marxists start pushing for similar programs with appealing Chinese numbers to back their initiatives .
As much as we ’ d like to think most Americans value their freedom , there are woefully few who would be willing to pass on convenience or safety at the expense of liberty .
The initial responses to the Patriot Act tell us this .
America ’ s embrace of social media , smart devices , ever-listening assistants , and authoritarian law enforcement practices paint a dark future that will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We must not ignore this any longer .
Big Brother is already forming here , and when the surveillance state in China proves to be wildly successful , Marxists in America will have data points to make their case .
We need to cut this off before it manifests fully .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
The Orwellian phrase “Big Brother Is Watching” has been fodder for conspiracy theorists and dystopian fearmongers for decades. But it’s no longer fiction, at least in China. The most prolific true surveillance state is in place. Everything anyone does in public in metro areas is being tracked and recorded. Many things happening in private are also being tracked and recorded. And as China officially launches its “social credit score” system this year, they will be using this data to keep a firm control over the population.
Creeping Dystopia: How China’s social credit score is spreading, even to America The world is reacting, and not in the way freedom-loving Americans would expect. I’ll admit, I was shocked to learn how many nations are watching China closely and starting to mimic their endeavors. They’re installing CCTV cameras every and pushing for biometrics usage in more and more areas. If that doesn’t sound familiar, it’s because you’re not paying attention. In the United States, CCTV cameras are going up everywhere and various government agencies are embracing the biometrics trend. Currently, it’s not nefarious for the most part. The embrace of these technologies is for practical purposes. But any technology as powerful as this, with tracking equipment connected to AI and stored in vast databases, can and eventually will be used against the people.
The video above from VICE’s Elle Reeve, who is now a correspondent for CNN, explores the surveillance angle of China’s plan. They will soon have over 600 million CCTV cameras spread around the nation monitoring everything. They already use facial recognition to allow (and track) people to come and go from buildings. They use it to register (and track) their food orders at restaurants, making recommendations based on their history. They even keep tabs on (and track) how many sheets of toilet paper people are using in public restrooms. One of the systems used is called… wait for it… Skynet. Seriously.
If this sounds like something that could never make it out of China, think again. Similar programs are being explored around the world at smaller scales as many, particularly Marxists, see a future where everyone is kept safe and in line through government’s control of all situations. Over 3000 suspected criminals have been apprehended through the subway systems alone, a statistic that prompted Dubai to install a similar system in their airports. The tracking of employees throughout their day, from the moment they enter the building (don’t be late) to the moment they leave has productivity implications that have many private businesses’ interests piqued. And the list goes on and on.
It couldn’t happen in America, right? Wrong. Currently, there is no national or state law that prohibits this type of surveillance. In fact, drones, police body cameras, and CCTV cameras in many major metros are already feeding into databases for allegedly “future” projects to be considered. A handful of cities have outlawed the practice, but the numbers are growing much slower than the interest the technology is sparking. With no legislative protection in place, we’re truly entering uncharted territory without anything other than wide-open speculation to drive ill-conceived initiatives.
But the real risk in all of this is what will happen in two to five years when results of China’s program starts making people say, “Hmm.” China’s initiative will be “successful,” at least on paper. There will be fewer crimes, less waste, more productivity, more socially conscientious actions, and most importantly more government control among a people who are used to being controlled already. That’s when we really need to worry as American Marxists start pushing for similar programs with appealing Chinese numbers to back their initiatives. As much as we’d like to think most Americans value their freedom, there are woefully few who would be willing to pass on convenience or safety at the expense of liberty. The initial responses to the Patriot Act tell us this. America’s embrace of social media, smart devices, ever-listening assistants, and authoritarian law enforcement practices paint a dark future that will be easy for surveillance fanatics to exploit.
We must not ignore this any longer. Big Brother is already forming here, and when the surveillance state in China proves to be wildly successful, Marxists in America will have data points to make their case. We need to cut this off before it manifests fully.
We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.
[gravityform id=”2″ title=”true” description=”false”]


Pardon Michael Flynn

This won ’ t be a long article .
It doesn ’ t need to be .
General Michael Flynn is a patriot , but the Department of Justice has recommended up to six months in jail .
He was set up by nefarious forces in our government who have been trying to take down President Trump since before he was even elected .
Flynn was a casualty of this effort , and despite evidence that clearly shows he was entrapped and then mislead by his own counsel , the Department of Justice has decided to send him to jail @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If Flynn spends a moment in jail , the Deep State wins .
America loses .
Law abiding citizens lose to a system that is designed for vengeance rather than justice .
Patriots lose in knowing someone who has dedicated his life to serving our nation can be rewarded with entrapment and incarceration .
The Constitution loses by being utilized for wrong instead of right .
President Trump should put an end to this heinous miscarriage of justice .
It ’ s time to send a message that Deep State operators can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stab anyone they don ’ t like .
# PardonMichaelFlynn now .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
This won’t be a long article. It doesn’t need to be. General Michael Flynn is a patriot, but the Department of Justice has recommended up to six months in jail. He was set up by nefarious forces in our government who have been trying to take down President Trump since before he was even elected. Flynn was a casualty of this effort, and despite evidence that clearly shows he was entrapped and then mislead by his own counsel, the Department of Justice has decided to send him to jail.
The Justice Department now says Michael Flynn deserves up to six months in prison for lying to the FBI. Andrew McCabe has openly admitted to lying to the FBI. Why hasn’t McCabe been indicted yet? Two-Tiered Justice System.#PardonFlynnNowhttps://t.co/WXdmPsWIuz — Benny (@bennyjohnson) January 7, 2020
Prosecutors recommend General Michael Flynn be sentenced to up to six months in jail. Meanwhile, John Brennan, James Comey, Andrew McCabe and the rest of the Obama cabal are still cashing checks from book deals and fake news television contracts. We live in a clown world. — thebradfordfile™ (@thebradfordfile) January 7, 2020
Rt if you stand with General Michael Flynn! A total and complete Patriot who loves our country and stands with President Trump! — ACT for America (@ACTforAmerica) January 7, 2020
Here’s the thing. If Flynn spends a moment in jail, the Deep State wins. America loses. Law abiding citizens lose to a system that is designed for vengeance rather than justice. Patriots lose in knowing someone who has dedicated his life to serving our nation can be rewarded with entrapment and incarceration. The Constitution loses by being utilized for wrong instead of right.
Have you ever heard of Democrat privilege? You know — Andrew McCabe being let off the hook, for the same the thing Michael Flynn is going to PRISON for? HYPOCRISY! Who agrees? ? — Tea Party Patriots (@TPPatriots) January 7, 2020
Bill Barr DOJ recommends prison for Michael Flynn https://t.co/SHTjibhiyA — TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) January 7, 2020
Why did the DOJ reverse course & recommend 6 months in prison for Michael Flynn? Because he fought back against the Deep State This is how they silence his defense & protect themselves General Flynn is a patriot He deserves an immediate pardon in the face of this decision RT — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) January 7, 2020
President Trump should put an end to this heinous miscarriage of justice. It’s time to send a message that Deep State operators cannot wield our Constitution like a dagger to stab anyone they don’t like. #PardonMichaelFlynn now.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-07--Media miscalculation on Iran sentiment should be scorned

Sometimes you have to wonder what the legacy media is thinking .
In their zeal to oppose absolutely anything President Trump does , they seem to have made a miscalculation .
They want to make us believe the Obama strategy of appeasement was moderating the Iranian regime .
In other words , handing them pallets of cash , opening up their economy and allowing them to continue the development on nuclear weapons in underground facilites we could not inspect was just ducky .
And “ Orange Man Bad ” is completely wrong to imperil the immense progress made by killing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Qassim Suleimani .
Here is Presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren trying to push the idea that diplomacy is the only solution : If that is indeed the narrative Democrats and their media PR firms want to push , they have taken an odd approach .
All of their mournful coverage today sounded more like Al-Jazeera then American media with some journalists actually amplifying Iraninan propaganda .
A small sample : They decided to let us know the whole of the Iranian population was in deep mournng over the death of Suleimani and was now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Because that ’ s never happened before .
Oh , wait , that has been the regime ’ s chant since about 1979 .
I guess the strategy is try and convince us that Iran is an equal power whose citizens are unified in seeking revenge ?
That some broad coalition of Iranians hate America ?
That ’ s a bold move Cotton , let ’ s see if it pays off .
My guess is the most likely outcome of this blatantly ridiculous meme will be hardening American resolve .
Suleimeni was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Middle East who rejoiced in the blood of hundreds of American soldiers along with that of countless Muslims , Christians and Jews across the region .
Intelligence reports said additional attacks against the U.S. and our allies were being planned throughout the Middle East under his leadership .
And while the Democrat activists in the media peddle mullah tears and mass mourning , there are resources painting a more realistic picture .
Not all mourning is voluntary and to push people into the streets the regime has shut down businesses and forced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ journalist Masih Alinejad also reminded everyone just last month the IRGC under Suleimani ’ s leadership killed approximately 1500 Iranian protestors .
Their families are prohibited from having funerals and some of them have been arrested and jailed .
These protests are part of a series of demonstrations against the regime that have occurred throughout the country in recent months .
Honest analysts will tell you the regime is actually on tenuous footing at home .
Economic sanctions have seriously damaged Iran ’ s economy and citizens are tired of economic resources being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ region rather than at home .
They will also tell you what is actually going on in the country .
Rather than listening to Martha Raddatz in her ridiculous head scarf speaking in dramatic tones , there are several better sources for information about what is going on in Iran .
In addition to Alinejad , you can also follow Michael Dorman and Heshmat Alavi for measured and well-documented information about what is going on inside the country .
Canadian activist Yasmine Mohammed is another great resource .
The greatest thing about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see world events through the eyes of people who are actually living through them .
Outlets like CNN and the New York Times should be ashamed of themselves and are worthy of scorn .
Let ’ s focus on supporting and sharing the dissident voices in Iran and elsewhere who are truly risking their lives to shine a light on the opppressive and violent regimes they live under .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Sometimes you have to wonder what the legacy media is thinking. In their zeal to oppose absolutely anything President Trump does, they seem to have made a miscalculation. They want to make us believe the Obama strategy of appeasement was moderating the Iranian regime.
In other words, handing them pallets of cash, opening up their economy and allowing them to continue the development on nuclear weapons in underground facilites we could not inspect was just ducky. And “Orange Man Bad” is completely wrong to imperil the immense progress made by killing their Terrorist in Chief, Major Gen. Qassim Suleimani. Here is Presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren trying to push the idea that diplomacy is the only solution:
Sen. Elizabeth Warren to @TheView on escalating tensions with Iran: "It is the responsibility of the commander in chief not to ask our military to solve problems that cannot be solved militarily." https://t.co/ulC7OobgIL pic.twitter.com/hmT1JrJA96 — ABC News (@ABC) January 7, 2020
If that is indeed the narrative Democrats and their media PR firms want to push, they have taken an odd approach. All of their mournful coverage today sounded more like Al-Jazeera then American media with some journalists actually amplifying Iraninan propaganda. A small sample:
Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, wept openly at the funeral for Gen. Qassem Soleimani. His tears give insight into how the death of the commander killed in a U.S. strike is being felt personally by the supreme leader. https://t.co/JuUCNNtyxQ — The Associated Press (@AP) January 6, 2020
Nikki Haley says no one is mourning the assassination of General Soleimani. I guess she didn’t see the hundreds of thousands of mourners in the streets of Iran. Trump’s reckless attack seems to have united both sides in Iran against the US.pic.twitter.com/Hgl2ekFwRS — Keith Boykin (@keithboykin) January 7, 2020
"A powerful combination of grief and anger, with shouts of 'death to America' echoing through the streets around us." https://t.co/Ho2Tizj1C6@MarthaRaddatz reports live from Iran. pic.twitter.com/kFrcKycwSg — Good Morning America (@GMA) January 6, 2020
“Knowing General Suleimani was out there made me feel safer,” said a student about the commander killed in an American drone strike. “He was like a security umbrella above our country.” Listen today's episode of The Daily. https://t.co/U3YUEnxqtX — The New York Times (@nytimes) January 7, 2020
Qassem Soleimani's funeral lasted 3 days, spanned 4 cities, and attracted massive crowds — a rare honour only awarded to national heroes. It hints at how far Iran is willing to go avenge his death. https://t.co/l1fvMUIauk — Alexandra Ma (@AlexandraMa15) January 7, 2020
They decided to let us know the whole of the Iranian population was in deep mournng over the death of Suleimani and was now chanting “Death to America”. Because that’s never happened before. Oh, wait, that has been the regime’s chant since about 1979.
I guess the strategy is try and convince us that Iran is an equal power whose citizens are unified in seeking revenge? That some broad coalition of Iranians hate America? That’s a bold move Cotton, let’s see if it pays off. My guess is the most likely outcome of this blatantly ridiculous meme will be hardening American resolve.
Suleimeni was the chief strategist behind terrorist attacks in the Middle East who rejoiced in the blood of hundreds of American soldiers along with that of countless Muslims, Christians and Jews across the region. Intelligence reports said additional attacks against the U.S. and our allies were being planned throughout the Middle East under his leadership.
And while the Democrat activists in the media peddle mullah tears and mass mourning, there are resources painting a more realistic picture. Not all mourning is voluntary and to push people into the streets the regime has shut down businesses and forced people to march.
Iranian activist and journalist Masih Alinejad also reminded everyone just last month the IRGC under Suleimani’s leadership killed approximately 1500 Iranian protestors. Their families are prohibited from having funerals and some of them have been arrested and jailed. These protests are part of a series of demonstrations against the regime that have occurred throughout the country in recent months.
Honest analysts will tell you the regime is actually on tenuous footing at home. Economic sanctions have seriously damaged Iran’s economy and citizens are tired of economic resources being spent on terrorism and wars throughout the region rather than at home.
They will also tell you what is actually going on in the country. Rather than listening to Martha Raddatz in her ridiculous head scarf speaking in dramatic tones, there are several better sources for information about what is going on in Iran. In addition to Alinejad, you can also follow Michael Dorman and Heshmat Alavi for measured and well-documented information about what is going on inside the country. Canadian activist Yasmine Mohammed is another great resource.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
The greatest thing about the democratization of information is the ability to see world events through the eyes of people who are actually living through them. Outlets like CNN and the New York Times should be ashamed of themselves and are worthy of scorn. Let’s focus on supporting and sharing the dissident voices in Iran and elsewhere who are truly risking their lives to shine a light on the opppressive and violent regimes they live under.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-07--TIME posts guide to help Democrats talk to their kids about Soleimani’s death. Seriously.

Iranian Major General Qasem Soleimani was a monster who orchestrated the deaths of literally hundreds of thousands of people in the Middle East , including at least several hundred Americans .
His death was long overdue .
The world is a better place now that he ’ s gone .
There .
That should be all parents need to know to talk to their kids about the terrorist ’ s death .
They ’ ll have to make it kid-friendly in their own way , perhaps noting that killing is a sin but even in the Bible even men made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be saved .
Unfortunately , all of that information is useless for many Democrats .
To them , Soleimani was just a “ top military leader in Iran , ” as TIME Magazine put it in their guide : How to Talk to Your Kids About the Situation With Iran We realize this is a difficult topic to explain to kids .
TIME for Kids is here to help .
The guide below offers talking points for how to answer questions about this tough topic .
It ’ s not intended to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s meant to arm you with the information you need if you choose to bring up the topic or if kids ask questions about it .
Trust your instincts .
You know your kids best .
Use that knowledge to gauge the depth and breadth of your discussion .
Sometimes , it ’ s best to let a child take the lead and only answer the questions that are asked .
Often , brief and simple answers can satisfy a child ’ s curiosity .
Though the guide does not mention political affiliation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The target audience is comprised of people who may have been indoctrinated into the beliefs that Soleimani was not a monster , that Iran ’ s government hasn ’ t been attacking us and chanting “ death to America ” since long before the airstrike , and that we ’ re on the verge of World War III .
In other words , they ’ re targeting Democrats .
This isn ’ t the only example of a mainstream media outlet revising recent history to benefit the political left .
In fact , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ news outlets who are rightly describing the current state of affairs in the Middle East .
This has turned purely political , just like everything else since President Trump was elected .
This is another opportunity to gaslight Trump supporters into thinking the policies they support are insane , including the righteous killing of the most prolific terrorist the world has seen since Osama bin Laden .
Twitter had some suggestions for TIME : It ’ s been a long time since we ’ ve seen something as immersed in fake news reporting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the Russia hoax had more lucidity in the reports of mainstream media than this .
The narrative is playing on people ’ s ignorance of the Middle East .
In a society with many who don ’ t know the difference between Sunnis and Shiites , mainstream media is hoping people won ’ t understand the complex rings of proxies used by Iran or the reality on the ground in Iraq .
Mainstream media is on full-assault mode on the Iranian situation , loaded with articles and broadcasts to make people believe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump ’ s whimsy .
TIME took it to a new level with this low of a story .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Iranian Major General Qasem Soleimani was a monster who orchestrated the deaths of literally hundreds of thousands of people in the Middle East, including at least several hundred Americans. His death was long overdue. The world is a better place now that he’s gone.
There. That should be all parents need to know to talk to their kids about the terrorist’s death. They’ll have to make it kid-friendly in their own way, perhaps noting that killing is a sin but even in the Bible even men made it necessary to kill so others could be saved. Unfortunately, all of that information is useless for many Democrats. To them, Soleimani was just a “top military leader in Iran,” as TIME Magazine put it in their guide:
How to Talk to Your Kids About the Situation With Iran We realize this is a difficult topic to explain to kids. TIME for Kids is here to help. The guide below offers talking points for how to answer questions about this tough topic. It’s not intended to be used as a script. It’s meant to arm you with the information you need if you choose to bring up the topic or if kids ask questions about it. Trust your instincts. You know your kids best. Use that knowledge to gauge the depth and breadth of your discussion. Sometimes, it’s best to let a child take the lead and only answer the questions that are asked. Often, brief and simple answers can satisfy a child’s curiosity.
Though the guide does not mention political affiliation, let’s face it. The target audience is comprised of people who may have been indoctrinated into the beliefs that Soleimani was not a monster, that Iran’s government hasn’t been attacking us and chanting “death to America” since long before the airstrike, and that we’re on the verge of World War III. In other words, they’re targeting Democrats.
This isn’t the only example of a mainstream media outlet revising recent history to benefit the political left. In fact, it’s getting harder to find news outlets who are rightly describing the current state of affairs in the Middle East. This has turned purely political, just like everything else since President Trump was elected. This is another opportunity to gaslight Trump supporters into thinking the policies they support are insane, including the righteous killing of the most prolific terrorist the world has seen since Osama bin Laden. Twitter had some suggestions for TIME:
My generation watched World War II movies on the 4:30 Movie, we did not need explained to us why you need to kill the bad guys so they stop murdering innocent people. https://t.co/5XUqa0K3wg — Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) January 7, 2020
"We put him down for a dirt nap." https://t.co/trMh2SJ4GB — Siraj Hashmi (@SirajAHashmi) January 7, 2020
"The very bad man got blowed up and now he's in Hell." There you go. Pretty easy. https://t.co/d7DMd5Aw2d — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) January 7, 2020
This new parody account is great! ? https://t.co/VYBZFNlb1j — Harambe-Actual, WebMD (@Flahutin) January 7, 2020
Kid: "What happened"
Me: "We killed a very bad man"
Kid: "That's good, right?"
Me: "How it might play out is very complicated and could be messy but, yes, world is better off."
Kid: "cool"
End of discussion. For transcripts, workbooks, and ideas for your own home hit my PayPal https://t.co/LR4B1RsXAe — Andrew Donaldson (@four4thefire) January 7, 2020
Journos are taking this loss really hard https://t.co/YcWez2bQR6 — Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug) January 7, 2020
It’s been a long time since we’ve seen something as immersed in fake news reporting as the Iranian situation. Even impeachment and the Russia hoax had more lucidity in the reports of mainstream media than this. The narrative is playing on people’s ignorance of the Middle East. In a society with many who don’t know the difference between Sunnis and Shiites, mainstream media is hoping people won’t understand the complex rings of proxies used by Iran or the reality on the ground in Iraq.
Mainstream media is on full-assault mode on the Iranian situation, loaded with articles and broadcasts to make people believe Qasem Soleimani was a victim of President Trump’s whimsy. TIME took it to a new level with this low of a story.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-07--Why Eric Ciaramella should be an impeachment witness whether he’s the whistleblower or not

Let ’ s play a game of make-believe .
Imagine if CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella is NOT the Ukraine whistleblower .
If you ’ ve been following the stories and connecting the dots , it ’ s a stretch of the imagination to believe such a ludicrous scenario , but give it a try .
Think of it as a thought experiment .
Are you there yet ?
Okay , now let ’ s consider the whole impeachment debacle in those terms .
If Ciaramella is not the whistleblower , then his testimony before the Senate is still extremely relevant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ National Security Council during the end of the Obama administration .
In that capacity , he often traveled with Vice President Joe Biden to Kyiv and met with senior Ukrainian officials regularly .
He continued this role through the first few months of the Trump administration until it because clear his overt “ resistance ” stance and accusations of covert activity to subvert President Trump ’ s foreign policy ( and in some cases , his presidency itself ) prevented him from doing his job .
The information he has , including first-hand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during the Burisma investigation by former Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin , is important to the impeachment trial .
It gives a perspective on the narrative that Biden pressured Ukraine to fire Shokin and end the corruption investigation into the company for which Biden ’ s son , Hunter , was previously on the board .
If there is no reason to suspect Biden ’ s quid pro quo was to protect his son , Ciaramella would be the person who can shed the most light on it other than those directly involved .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he should be begging to testify on behalf of his former boss .
Biden claims the order to force Shokin out was an administration policy that wanted corrupt prosecutors out of allied nations ’ government ’ s .
Of course , there was no pressure applied to any other country in the entire history of the United States to remove a prosecutor , but as the story goes , Shokin was corrupt and it had nothing to do with the Burisma investigation .
Remember , we ’ re still playing make-believe .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , then he can debunk the conspiracy theories that he met with his former buddies at the NSC who happen to be working for House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff .
One of the most popular tales being told by those in the vast right-wing conspiracy is that the whistleblower met with Sean Misko and Abigail Grace from Schiff ’ s office and formerly with Ciaramella at the NSC .
He can tell us how the whistleblower , which is totally not him , met with his friends .
And his friends totally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ met with , because Schiff has denied even knowing who the whistleblower is .
That way , he can wipe away the Pinocchio ’ s even progressive Washington Post gave Schiff for claiming they never met with the whistleblower before someone at the office slipped and revealed it .
It ’ s Ciaramella ’ s debunking frenzy if he ’ d simply testify in this make-believe scenario .
But arguably the most important reason Ciaramella should testify is to debunk my conspiracy theory that he blew the whistle in an effort to protect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was a positive in his book , as was locking the President in a distracting impeachment battle , but in reality , he may have been looking out for # 1 .
In the real world , Eric Ciaramella is the whistleblower .
But even if he isn ’ t , his testimony before the Senate , whether for the impeachment debacle or an investigation into Adam Schiff ’ s lies , would still be relevant .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Let’s play a game of make-believe. Imagine if CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella is NOT the Ukraine whistleblower. If you’ve been following the stories and connecting the dots, it’s a stretch of the imagination to believe such a ludicrous scenario, but give it a try. Think of it as a thought experiment. Are you there yet? Okay, now let’s consider the whole impeachment debacle in those terms.
If Ciaramella is not the whistleblower, then his testimony before the Senate is still extremely relevant. He was Ukraine Director on the National Security Council during the end of the Obama administration. In that capacity, he often traveled with Vice President Joe Biden to Kyiv and met with senior Ukrainian officials regularly. He continued this role through the first few months of the Trump administration until it because clear his overt “resistance” stance and accusations of covert activity to subvert President Trump’s foreign policy (and in some cases, his presidency itself) prevented him from doing his job.
The information he has, including first-hand accounts of what went on in Ukraine during the Burisma investigation by former Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, is important to the impeachment trial. It gives a perspective on the narrative that Biden pressured Ukraine to fire Shokin and end the corruption investigation into the company for which Biden’s son, Hunter, was previously on the board. If there is no reason to suspect Biden’s quid pro quo was to protect his son, Ciaramella would be the person who can shed the most light on it other than those directly involved.
If he’s not the whistleblower, he should be begging to testify on behalf of his former boss. Biden claims the order to force Shokin out was an administration policy that wanted corrupt prosecutors out of allied nations’ government’s. Of course, there was no pressure applied to any other country in the entire history of the United States to remove a prosecutor, but as the story goes, Shokin was corrupt and it had nothing to do with the Burisma investigation. Remember, we’re still playing make-believe.
If he’s not the whistleblower, then he can debunk the conspiracy theories that he met with his former buddies at the NSC who happen to be working for House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff. One of the most popular tales being told by those in the vast right-wing conspiracy is that the whistleblower met with Sean Misko and Abigail Grace from Schiff’s office and formerly with Ciaramella at the NSC.
He can tell us how the whistleblower, which is totally not him, met with his friends. And his friends totally didn’t tell Schiff who they met with, because Schiff has denied even knowing who the whistleblower is. That way, he can wipe away the Pinocchio’s even progressive Washington Post gave Schiff for claiming they never met with the whistleblower before someone at the office slipped and revealed it. It’s Ciaramella’s debunking frenzy if he’d simply testify in this make-believe scenario.
The impeachment is obviously a complete dud for Democrats–dead on arrival in the senate. But I still want to hear Eric Ciaramella testify about his dealings w Adam Schiff. When you conspire against the president, it doesn't "go away" because your coup failed. They are traitors. — thebradfordfile™ (@thebradfordfile) January 7, 2020
But arguably the most important reason Ciaramella should testify is to debunk my conspiracy theory that he blew the whistle in an effort to protect himself, not Biden. Helping Biden was a positive in his book, as was locking the President in a distracting impeachment battle, but in reality, he may have been looking out for #1.
.@JDRucker – you are right on the money. We are working on another investigative special now. Hope to have it in Jan or Feb. https://t.co/tOxe4buZtF — Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) December 30, 2019
In the real world, Eric Ciaramella is the whistleblower. But even if he isn’t, his testimony before the Senate, whether for the impeachment debacle or an investigation into Adam Schiff’s lies, would still be relevant.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-08--Mark Robinson: ‘Not one inch on the 2nd Amendment’

The Virginia liberty grabbers are doubling down on more restrictions on freedom .
Mark Robinson gave an impassioned speech in support of the Second Amendment and against tyrannical laws being proposed in Virginia and elsewhere around America .
There is also news that while some localities are voting in second amendment sanctuaries , other localities are trying to backtrack on freedom , specifically Prince William County .
Meanwhile , the liberty grabber leftists have made it plain that this isn ’ t just about vaguely defined ‘ assault firearms ’ .
Everyone has heard of liberty-free zones [ i.e .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ location of choice for mass murderers .
The insane logic of the liberty grabber left that has conveniently disarmed the innocent to the delight of the criminal element , because they don ’ t follow the law anyway .
Since liberty-free zones have worked out so well , the authoritarians want to go one better , just to make sure there are disarmed innocents while making it harder to get any type of safety training .
As reported by Law Enforcement Today : Virginia is now trying to pass “ ammunition free ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policies .
Banning gun safety training for the purpose of gun safety .
MRCTV also reported that the liberty grabbers want to Ban Many Indoor Gun Ranges and Outlaw Open-Carry in Vehicles .
The irony is that the press release announcing this new restriction on liberty references ‘ historic gun safety measures ’ .
So while they claim it ’ s all for safety , it will have the opposite effect since these ranges are places where people learn to properly handle firearms .
This alone speaks volumes on the left ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This isn ’ t about ‘ gun safety ’ or even protecting the children .
This is about empowering criminals and the government .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
The Virginia liberty grabbers are doubling down on more restrictions on freedom.
Mark Robinson gave an impassioned speech in support of the Second Amendment and against tyrannical laws being proposed in Virginia and elsewhere around America. There is also news that while some localities are voting in second amendment sanctuaries, other localities are trying to backtrack on freedom, specifically Prince William County.
Meanwhile, the liberty grabber leftists have made it plain that this isn’t just about vaguely defined ‘assault firearms’.
Ammo-free zones.
Everyone has heard of liberty-free zones [i.e. gun free zones], these are location of choice for mass murderers. The insane logic of the liberty grabber left that has conveniently disarmed the innocent to the delight of the criminal element, because they don’t follow the law anyway.
Since liberty-free zones have worked out so well, the authoritarians want to go one better, just to make sure there are disarmed innocents while making it harder to get any type of safety training. As reported by Law Enforcement Today: Virginia is now trying to pass “ammunition free” zones as politicians double down on anti-gun policies.
Banning gun safety training for the purpose of gun safety.
MRCTV also reported that the liberty grabbers want to Ban Many Indoor Gun Ranges and Outlaw Open-Carry in Vehicles.
Amid a slew of potential new gun control laws being considered in the newly Democrat-controlled state of Virginia, one soon-to-be lawmaker is putting forward a bill targeting indoor gun ranges, open-carry laws and concealed carry permits, all in one fell swoop.
The irony is that the press release announcing this new restriction on liberty references ‘historic gun safety measures’. So while they claim it’s all for safety, it will have the opposite effect since these ranges are places where people learn to properly handle firearms. This alone speaks volumes on the left’s true intentions in their socialist national agenda. This isn’t about ‘gun safety’ or even protecting the children. This is about empowering criminals and the government.


noqreport--2020-01-08--Once Upon A Time in America

Once Upon A Time in America

Once upon a time , the Democratic party at least gave lip service to the concept of law and order .
Wait !
That was less than a month ago .
Nancy Pelosi announced that she was directing her committee chairmen to proceed with articles of impeachment against Donald Trump because “ no one is above the law.
” What a relief !
The Democrats still believe in law and order !
And they want Congress to pass a Declaration of War before Trump does anything military overseas .
Wait !
They were apoplectic when Trump redeployed fifty – count @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the Syrian border with Turkey .
We had “ betrayed ” the Kurds .
Curious .
The Kurds were our allies of the moment in the effort to destroy ISIS , which the Kurds had already been fighting .
But where was the Declaration of War to be involved in Syria at any time ?
But this time , when an Iranian Terrorist is killed , the typical Democrat response is : This reminds me of the classic way the Left rigs the climate change argument .
If you control the start @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say anything .
If you pick a cold year to start your chart , then today looks like a sauna – even as snow closes highways with chain reaction crashes .
If you start with a hot year , then California ’ s brush fires look like nothing more than normal summer .
Wait !
They are normal .
At least until the Left Coast resumes proper forest management .
But I digress .
It seems that the Left has already forgotten that the droning of the Quds Force commander was a response @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ordered .
And that attack led to the death of an American .
So where do we start ?
On www.startpage.com I have to go five ( 5 ) pages to find the December 27 attack that started this sequence .
So as long as our memory isn ’ t over a week long , the US is the aggressor .
But if we look further , we find a loooong series of provocations by Iran .
Those started in 1979 with the capture of the US Embassy in Tehran .
But even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drone and the Iranian missile attack on the Saudi refinery escape the Left ’ s attention .
That must be why the Democrat symbol is a jackass instead of elephant .
Elephants have a reputation for functional memory , unlike the Left , which only remembers emotional talking points of the moment .
The first question we must consider is legality .
The US Constitution clearly gives foreign policy authority to the President .
Along with that , the Constitution makes the President the Commander-in-Chief of all the armed forces .
Thus , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has full authority to command a counter-attack , regardless of the form that it may take .
Thus , the only real question is whether US forces are lawfully engaged in Iraq or in opposition to Iran .
The Constitution requires the involvement of Congress on two fronts .
The first is declaring war .
The last “ Declaration of War ” brought us formally into World War II after Pearl Harbor .
But under a different title , Congress did pass an “ Authorization for the Use of Military Force.
” And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nations , organizations , or persons he determines planned , authorized , committed , or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11 , 2001 , or harbored such organizations or persons.
” Since Iran facilitated the transit of the 9/11 hijackers , they fall under the AUMF .
The second question is “ propriety.
” For those of you who don ’ t read dictionaries at lunch , that ’ s about the “ law of war.
” Is it “ proper ” to kill the commander of enemy forces ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ at war with us ( as part of the millennium-long war of Islam with civilization ) since 1979 , this answer has to be unequivocally , “ Yes.
” The rank of an enemy combatant is irrelevant .
Not since the British complained about colonials shooting officers has this question even been an issue .
A third issue is timing .
Since Congress hasn ’ t restricted funding , and an enemy commander is a legitimate target , when is a good time to take him out ?
This is a proper function @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s always a judgment call , and will always find supporters and detractors .
But because President Trump is Commander-in-Chief , it ’ s his call , and his alone .
The universal condemnation of Trump ’ s order to kill Soleimani from the Left can therefore be only one thing : “ Orange Man Bad.
” Trump Derangement Syndrome has so consumed the Democrat Party that it simply can not see that there may be some benefit to removing the mastermind of so much evil against America .
Cries that we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” are the ravings of deranged minds .
It is sad that so many Americans have simply lost their ability to think .
A few on the Left are still able to understand that even if they generally disagree with the President , he may be able to achieve some good in the world .
They are reachable .
The rest are not .
But we must rest our hopes for the future on the millions who have not contracted TDS , and can be convinced that , whatever we may dislike about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more good for America than harm .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Once upon a time, the Democratic party at least gave lip service to the concept of law and order. Wait! That was less than a month ago. Nancy Pelosi announced that she was directing her committee chairmen to proceed with articles of impeachment against Donald Trump because “no one is above the law.”
What a relief! The Democrats still believe in law and order! And they want Congress to pass a Declaration of War before Trump does anything military overseas.
Wait! They were apoplectic when Trump redeployed fifty – count ’em – fifty special operators away from the Syrian border with Turkey. We had “betrayed” the Kurds. Curious. The Kurds were our allies of the moment in the effort to destroy ISIS, which the Kurds had already been fighting. But where was the Declaration of War to be involved in Syria at any time?
But this time, when an Iranian Terrorist is killed, the typical Democrat response is:
Last night the President engaged in what is widely being recognized as an act of war against Iran, one that now risks the lives of millions of innocent people. Now is the moment to prevent war & protect innocent people – the question for many is how, publicly & Congressionally: — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) January 3, 2020
This reminds me of the classic way the Left rigs the climate change argument. If you control the start time, you can make the data say anything. If you pick a cold year to start your chart, then today looks like a sauna – even as snow closes highways with chain reaction crashes. If you start with a hot year, then California’s brush fires look like nothing more than normal summer.
Wait! They are normal. At least until the Left Coast resumes proper forest management. But I digress.
It seems that the Left has already forgotten that the droning of the Quds Force commander was a response to an attack that he planned and ordered. And that attack led to the death of an American. So where do we start? On www.startpage.com I have to go five (5) pages to find the December 27 attack that started this sequence. So as long as our memory isn’t over a week long, the US is the aggressor. But if we look further, we find a loooong series of provocations by Iran. Those started in 1979 with the capture of the US Embassy in Tehran. But even the recent Iranian shootdown of a US drone and the Iranian missile attack on the Saudi refinery escape the Left’s attention. That must be why the Democrat symbol is a jackass instead of elephant. Elephants have a reputation for functional memory, unlike the Left, which only remembers emotional talking points of the moment.
The first question we must consider is legality. The US Constitution clearly gives foreign policy authority to the President. Along with that, the Constitution makes the President the Commander-in-Chief of all the armed forces. Thus, when US forces are attacked, he has full authority to command a counter-attack, regardless of the form that it may take. Thus, the only real question is whether US forces are lawfully engaged in Iraq or in opposition to Iran.
The Constitution requires the involvement of Congress on two fronts. The first is declaring war. The last “Declaration of War” brought us formally into World War II after Pearl Harbor. But under a different title, Congress did pass an “Authorization for the Use of Military Force.” And that action authorized action against “those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons.” Since Iran facilitated the transit of the 9/11 hijackers, they fall under the AUMF.
The second question is “propriety.” For those of you who don’t read dictionaries at lunch, that’s about the “law of war.” Is it “proper” to kill the commander of enemy forces? Given the fact that Iran has been at war with us (as part of the millennium-long war of Islam with civilization) since 1979, this answer has to be unequivocally, “Yes.” The rank of an enemy combatant is irrelevant. Not since the British complained about colonials shooting officers has this question even been an issue.
A third issue is timing. Since Congress hasn’t restricted funding, and an enemy commander is a legitimate target, when is a good time to take him out? This is a proper function of command on our side. It’s always a judgment call, and will always find supporters and detractors. But because President Trump is Commander-in-Chief, it’s his call, and his alone.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
The universal condemnation of Trump’s order to kill Soleimani from the Left can therefore be only one thing: “Orange Man Bad.” Trump Derangement Syndrome has so consumed the Democrat Party that it simply cannot see that there may be some benefit to removing the mastermind of so much evil against America. Cries that we will be “stirring up a war” are the ravings of deranged minds.
It is sad that so many Americans have simply lost their ability to think. A few on the Left are still able to understand that even if they generally disagree with the President, he may be able to achieve some good in the world. They are reachable. The rest are not. But we must rest our hopes for the future on the millions who have not contracted TDS, and can be convinced that, whatever we may dislike about Donald Trump, he has done far more good for America than harm.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-08--Iran is the big test. If there is no war, President Trump wins reelection easily.

The greatest threat to President Trump ’ s reelection bid is another unpopular Middle East war .
That ’ s not to say if we were to go to war with Iran following their ballistic missile attacks on U.S. bases in Iraq that he couldn ’ t still win , but ending this conflict without further major aggressive actions from either side would be a huge political victory .
Currently , there are no reported casualties from Iran ’ s attack .
Lord willing , it stays that way , in which case we have a clear path to peace @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prolific terrorist of recent times , Qasem Soleimani , in exchange for structural damage to U.S. bases is a fair trade off .
In fact , it would be a major feather in President Trump ’ s cap if he maintains his posture of strength while mitigating risks to our troops in the Middle East .
It will be difficult for Democrats and mainstream media to paint a non-war scenario as anything but positive , but they ’ ll still do their best to spin everything the President does as negative , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I stand by me assessment from six months ago that war is not inevitable .
Just as I noted back then , strikes were impossible to avoid based on their incessant prodding , and Soleimani ’ s death followed by Iran ’ s strikes today match my prediction .
An attack by the west is the best thing Iran can hope to happen at this point .
Their economy is crumbling .
Their terror and militia proxies are hurting because of the dried up funds no longer coming in from Tehran .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oil tanker around Africa to Syria , one of the few places willing to disregard U.S. sanctions against Iran .
So they ’ re left with either giving up their nuclear weapons ambitions altogether or provoking a war without being clearly seen as the aggressors .
Even though I do not believe war is inevitable , I don ’ t see a way to completely avoid military action .
Iran won ’ t stop until they ’ ve forced an attack against them .
The Middle East has always been a volatile place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to appear like the victims to the international community while still seeming strong internally , strikes may be inevitable but war is not .
What if there is war , or even limited airstrikes traded by both sides ?
Does that mean President Trump won ’ t get reelected ?
No .
He ’ s still in the driver ’ s seat and as long as U.S. troops aren ’ t marching towards Tehran , he can spin this mess as being not so bad .
That being the case , it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discernment , strength , and peace .
All of these points are spot-on .
Iran ’ s attack and their follow-up statement saying this will be their only attack as long as there ’ s no counter-strike tells us they aren ’ t itching for war .
It ’ s also accurate that they will be doing other things to harm us .
We can expect cyberattacks , limited aggressive moves by their proxies , and a major PR scheme flaming anti-American and anti-Trump rhetoric internationally and at home .
They may be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they can blame on unaffiliated “ supporters.
” But the most important part of this thread is his advice to the President : Take the “ W. ” President Trump has an opportunity .
He stared them down and then took a shot from them .
If it did no real harm and he remains composed , allowing this to deescalate , he will be the statesman his four most recent predecessors were not .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
The greatest threat to President Trump’s reelection bid is another unpopular Middle East war. That’s not to say if we were to go to war with Iran following their ballistic missile attacks on U.S. bases in Iraq that he couldn’t still win, but ending this conflict without further major aggressive actions from either side would be a huge political victory. Currently, there are no reported casualties from Iran’s attack. Lord willing, it stays that way, in which case we have a clear path to peace.
This is the first major foreign relations test for @realDonaldTrump. His four most recent predecessors all failed theirs. The #IranAttacks can go in dozens of different directions. Pray for discernment. Pray for strength. Pray that the right decisions are made. — JD Rucker (@JDRucker) January 8, 2020
Taking the life of the most prolific terrorist of recent times, Qasem Soleimani, in exchange for structural damage to U.S. bases is a fair trade off. In fact, it would be a major feather in President Trump’s cap if he maintains his posture of strength while mitigating risks to our troops in the Middle East. It will be difficult for Democrats and mainstream media to paint a non-war scenario as anything but positive, but they’ll still do their best to spin everything the President does as negative, as they’re wont to do. I stand by me assessment from six months ago that war is not inevitable. Just as I noted back then, strikes were impossible to avoid based on their incessant prodding, and Soleimani’s death followed by Iran’s strikes today match my prediction.
An attack by the west is the best thing Iran can hope to happen at this point. Their economy is crumbling. Their terror and militia proxies are hurting because of the dried up funds no longer coming in from Tehran. They can’t seem to sneak an oil tanker around Africa to Syria, one of the few places willing to disregard U.S. sanctions against Iran. So they’re left with either giving up their nuclear weapons ambitions altogether or provoking a war without being clearly seen as the aggressors.
Even though I do not believe war is inevitable, I don’t see a way to completely avoid military action. Iran won’t stop until they’ve forced an attack against them.
The Middle East has always been a volatile place. With Iran doing everything they can to appear like the victims to the international community while still seeming strong internally, strikes may be inevitable but war is not.
What if there is war, or even limited airstrikes traded by both sides? Does that mean President Trump won’t get reelected? No. He’s still in the driver’s seat and as long as U.S. troops aren’t marching towards Tehran, he can spin this mess as being not so bad. That being the case, it’s time for Americans to pray for discernment, strength, and peace.
Twitter user AGHamilton29 delivered a very important and accurate thread:
Iran has made a calculation about extent of public retaliation they believe US would tolerate without further escalation. This will not be Iran's only action, but there needs to be a careful consideration of damage and whether further direct confrontation now is in US interest. https://t.co/OlL3pgvtd0 — (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) January 8, 2020
With that said, there is a strong case for taking the W and avoiding further direct confrontation at this time. We should reinforce our alliance with Iraq as there will now be a competition over who they blame and how they react (Iran for the attack or us for being the targets). — (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) January 8, 2020
All of these points are spot-on. Iran’s attack and their follow-up statement saying this will be their only attack as long as there’s no counter-strike tells us they aren’t itching for war. It’s also accurate that they will be doing other things to harm us. We can expect cyberattacks, limited aggressive moves by their proxies, and a major PR scheme flaming anti-American and anti-Trump rhetoric internationally and at home. They may be planning terrorist attacks in the United States that they can blame on unaffiliated “supporters.” But the most important part of this thread is his advice to the President: Take the “W.”
President Trump has an opportunity. He stared them down and then took a shot from them. If it did no real harm and he remains composed, allowing this to deescalate, he will be the statesman his four most recent predecessors were not.


noqreport--2020-01-08--Iran’s spin: Zero american casualties, but 80 Americans dead. What?

The feared Iranian response to the targeted killing of Qassem Soleimani , the powerful head of Iran ’ s Quds Force , has passed with hardly a whimper .
Dozens of missiles were fired at an America base in Iraq with no casualties .
But if you ask the Iranian regime or its media , eighty Americans were killed , and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard took responsibility .
What actually happened in those attacks , why are we getting sharply conflicting reports , and what is likely to happen next ?
Middle East expert David Rubin , former Mayor of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Trump and the Jew , ” answers this question and more .
What do Israelis think about the Iranian missile response to the targeted killing of Soleimani ?
Rubin : It was a fairly impressive air show and a chance to save face for the Iranian regime after the humiliating elimination of their revered military leader .
How do we account for the conflicting accounts of the casualties ?
Was it 80 Americans killed or zero casualties ?
Rubin : Remember that we are talking about a totalitarian theocracy in Iran .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ people to pretend that this was a strong response , while in reality , it was a fireworks photo op .
However , in the age of Internet , people have learned to see through fake news , especially in a country like Iran , in which a large portion of the population has learned to be suspicious of the state-controlled media .
Can we expect another more serious attack ?
Rubin : It ’ s possible , but I really think the regime is going to hesitate , since they have to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I think they listened quite carefully to President Trump ’ s threat of hitting 52 targets in Iran , each representing the 52 American hostages taken captive by Iran in 1979 and held for 444 days .
The symbolism was no accident .
Americans who know their history have not forgotten that horrible period during the weak-kneed Jimmy Carter administration .
What about the latest Iranian threat to attack Israel ?
Rubin : The Iranian regime sees Israel as a vulnerable American-aligned target that they can hit hard either on their own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their surrogate in Lebanon , just north of Israel .
While it ’ s true that they can do some damage to our tiny country , we do have a very powerful military , along with the know-how to deliver missiles that know how to hit their targets .
Hitting closer to home , you and your son were targets of a Muslim terrorist that left you injured and your son in critical condition , leading to your founding of Shiloh Israel Children ’ s Fund .
Tell us about that and your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ driving home from Jerusalem with my three-year-old son when our car was ambushed by Muslim terrorists who were perched on the side of the road with AK-47 assault rifles .
I was shot in the leg and my son was shot in the head .
In fact , the bullet that went into his head and through his neck missed his brain stem by one millimeter .
In short , I eventually managed to restart the car , to get away from the terrorists and to get to the hospital where we had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ months , but the psychological trauma that my son experienced caused me to start the Shiloh Israel Children ’ s Fund for the purpose of creating integrative therapeutic-educational programs to heal the trauma of thousands of Israeli children and to restore some of the lost innocence of childhood to their young lives .
In your new book , you covered a lot of territory about Iran , Israel , the Middle East and President Trump .
Where can people get a copy of your book “ Trump and the Jews ” ?
Rubin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just go to Amazon.com and type in the words “ Trump and the Jews ” .
David Rubin , former Mayor of Shiloh Israel , is the author of the book , “ Trump and the Jews ” and five other books .
Rubin is the founder and president of Shiloh Israel Children ’ s Fund , established after he and his then three-year-old son were wounded in a terror attack .
He can be found at www.DavidRubinIsrael.com or at www.ShilohIsraelChildren.org

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
The feared Iranian response to the targeted killing of Qassem Soleimani, the powerful head of Iran’s Quds Force, has passed with hardly a whimper. Dozens of missiles were fired at an America base in Iraq with no casualties. But if you ask the Iranian regime or its media, eighty Americans were killed, and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard took responsibility.
What actually happened in those attacks, why are we getting sharply conflicting reports, and what is likely to happen next?
Middle East expert David Rubin, former Mayor of Shiloh and author of the book, “Trump and the Jew,” answers this question and more.
What do Israelis think about the Iranian missile response to the targeted killing of Soleimani?
Rubin: It was a fairly impressive air show and a chance to save face for the Iranian regime after the humiliating elimination of their revered military leader.
How do we account for the conflicting accounts of the casualties? Was it 80 Americans killed or zero casualties?
Rubin: Remember that we are talking about a totalitarian theocracy in Iran. They need to lie to their own people to pretend that this was a strong response, while in reality, it was a fireworks photo op. However, in the age of Internet, people have learned to see through fake news, especially in a country like Iran, in which a large portion of the population has learned to be suspicious of the state-controlled media.
Can we expect another more serious attack?
Rubin: It’s possible, but I really think the regime is going to hesitate, since they have to be wary of a harsh American response. I think they listened quite carefully to President Trump’s threat of hitting 52 targets in Iran, each representing the 52 American hostages taken captive by Iran in 1979 and held for 444 days. The symbolism was no accident. Americans who know their history have not forgotten that horrible period during the weak-kneed Jimmy Carter administration.
What about the latest Iranian threat to attack Israel?
Rubin: The Iranian regime sees Israel as a vulnerable American-aligned target that they can hit hard either on their own or through the Hezbollah terrorist organization, their surrogate in Lebanon, just north of Israel. While it’s true that they can do some damage to our tiny country, we do have a very powerful military, along with the know-how to deliver missiles that know how to hit their targets.
Hitting closer to home, you and your son were targets of a Muslim terrorist that left you injured and your son in critical condition, leading to your founding of Shiloh Israel Children’s Fund. Tell us about that and your charitable organization.
Rubin: I was driving home from Jerusalem with my three-year-old son when our car was ambushed by Muslim terrorists who were perched on the side of the road with AK-47 assault rifles. I was shot in the leg and my son was shot in the head. In fact, the bullet that went into his head and through his neck missed his brain stem by one millimeter. In short, I eventually managed to restart the car, to get away from the terrorists and to get to the hospital where we had several operations over a span of several months, but the psychological trauma that my son experienced caused me to start the Shiloh Israel Children’s Fund for the purpose of creating integrative therapeutic-educational programs to heal the trauma of thousands of Israeli children and to restore some of the lost innocence of childhood to their young lives.
In your new book, you covered a lot of territory about Iran, Israel, the Middle East and President Trump. Where can people get a copy of your book “Trump and the Jews”?
Rubin: They can go to www.DavidRubinIsrael.com or just go to Amazon.com and type in the words “Trump and the Jews”.
About Middle East Expert David Rubin:
David Rubin, former Mayor of Shiloh Israel, is the author of the book, “Trump and the Jews” and five other books. Rubin is the founder and president of Shiloh Israel Children’s Fund, established after he and his then three-year-old son were wounded in a terror attack. He can be found at www.DavidRubinIsrael.com or at www.ShilohIsraelChildren.org
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-08--With Iran narrative failing her, Nancy Pelosi will release the Articles of Impeachment soon

This hasn ’ t been a good week for Democrats after seeming at first to be a great one .
They thought President Trump had made a political mistake by killing Qasem Soleimani , a mistake that culminated in what they hoped to be a devastating counter-strike from Iran yesterday .
Thankfully , the counter-strike wasn ’ t nearly as devastating as Iranians ( and Democrats ) had hoped .
With zero casualties , peace was still on the table .
This morning , President Trump took the peaceful option while punctuating it with threats of repercussions in the future @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To make it even worse for Iran ( and Democrats ) , President Trump slapped on new sanctions and called them to the negotiating table to discuss a new Iranian Nuclear Deal .
After all the bluster , breathless protests , and idiotic pro-Iranian hashtags on social media , they ’ re left with nothing .
Killing Soleimani is quickly being understood as a good move by most as word of his involvement in killing hundreds of Americans and tens of thousands of people in the Middle East breaks through mainstream media ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s response seems silly now .
As for starting a war , nope .
Not today .
Isn ’ t it odd that President Trump seems more adamant about peace than his Nobel-Peace-Prize-winning predecessor ?
The only thing Democrats have left with the Iranian narrative is to hope they escalate again , as it ’ s clear President Trump isn ’ t going to launch military strikes against them otherwise .
They ’ ll give it the rest of the week , but not much longer than that .
When it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be their Trump-busting narrative , Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi will be forced to release the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate .
She ’ ll have to because the longer she waits , the harder it becomes to justify her actions .
Even powerful Democratic Senators , one from her own state , aren ’ t happy about Pelosi ’ s delay .
A general rule for politicians who possess as much power as Pelosi is this : If the subject doesn ’ t benefit you , change it .
Right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ completely demolished the primary narrative Democrats have been pushing for a week .
They told the world they needed to put forth legislation to stop President Trump from starting a war .
But he didn ’ t and he won ’ t .
Now , Democrats have two options .
They can push forward with the legislation , in which case they ’ ll look foolish at best for making a fuss over something unnecessarily .
At worst , it could prompt Iran to act , in which case even their mainstream media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cover for them .
The other option is to ignore Iran altogether and change the subject .
Pelosi is holding in her hand the only thing that can shift conversation away from President Trump ’ s clear victory over Iran .
She may go ahead and send the Articles to the Senate and watch it get obliterated as quickly as Iran ’ s resolve .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
This hasn’t been a good week for Democrats after seeming at first to be a great one. They thought President Trump had made a political mistake by killing Qasem Soleimani, a mistake that culminated in what they hoped to be a devastating counter-strike from Iran yesterday. Thankfully, the counter-strike wasn’t nearly as devastating as Iranians (and Democrats) had hoped. With zero casualties, peace was still on the table. This morning, President Trump took the peaceful option while punctuating it with threats of repercussions in the future if Iran steps out of line. To make it even worse for Iran (and Democrats), President Trump slapped on new sanctions and called them to the negotiating table to discuss a new Iranian Nuclear Deal.
After all the bluster, breathless protests, and idiotic pro-Iranian hashtags on social media, they’re left with nothing. Killing Soleimani is quickly being understood as a good move by most as word of his involvement in killing hundreds of Americans and tens of thousands of people in the Middle East breaks through mainstream media’s shields. Their fearmongering about Iran’s response seems silly now. As for starting a war, nope. Not today. Isn’t it odd that President Trump seems more adamant about peace than his Nobel-Peace-Prize-winning predecessor?
Poor Democrats. This week, their leaders asked them to mourn for a terrorist, fear an impotent nation on the brink of economic collapse, and hope @realDonaldTrump tries to start a war. When your only policy is opposition, you get stuck on the wrong side of most narratives. — JD Rucker (@JDRucker) January 8, 2020
The only thing Democrats have left with the Iranian narrative is to hope they escalate again, as it’s clear President Trump isn’t going to launch military strikes against them otherwise. They’ll give it the rest of the week, but not much longer than that. When it’s clear Iran is not going to be their Trump-busting narrative, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi will be forced to release the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. She’ll have to because the longer she waits, the harder it becomes to justify her actions. Even powerful Democratic Senators, one from her own state, aren’t happy about Pelosi’s delay.
Pelosi has refused to send the articles for 21 DAYS. Even liberals in the Senate have begun criticizing her: Murphy: “I think the time has passed. She should send the articles over.” Feinstein: “I don’t see what good delay does.” This sham needs to end! — Ronna McDaniel (@GOPChairwoman) January 8, 2020
A general rule for politicians who possess as much power as Pelosi is this: If the subject doesn’t benefit you, change it. Right now, the topic of Iran has completely demolished the primary narrative Democrats have been pushing for a week. They told the world they needed to put forth legislation to stop President Trump from starting a war. But he didn’t and he won’t. Now, Democrats have two options. They can push forward with the legislation, in which case they’ll look foolish at best for making a fuss over something unnecessarily. At worst, it could prompt Iran to act, in which case even their mainstream media proxies won’t be able to cover for them.
The other option is to ignore Iran altogether and change the subject.
Pelosi is holding in her hand the only thing that can shift conversation away from President Trump’s clear victory over Iran. She may go ahead and send the Articles to the Senate and watch it get obliterated as quickly as Iran’s resolve.


noqreport--2020-01-08--President Trump to Iran: Let’s make a deal. Also, have more sanctions.

President Trump addressed the press and the nation in the White House Grand Foyer this morning , an unusual choice for a press conference about Iran .
But it became clear this was a strategic move as the message was intended as much for Iran and the rest of the world as it was for the American people .
Following yesterday ’ s attack from Iran against airbases in Iraq that housed multiple allied nations ’ military personnel , Iran declared they would not undertake further attacks as long as there was no counterattack .
This hope seems to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warned Iraq two hours before the attacks and were able to kill exactly zero people with 15 ballistics missiles .
Plus , their choice of targets seems to indicate they had no intention of killing anyone .
They wanted a display for their own people while , to whom state television has claimed 80 or more Americans were killed .
But they didn ’ t want a counterattack , which very likely would have happened if they struck with purpose .
“ As long as I am President of the United States , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” the President said to start his press conference .
From there , it just got better for America and worse for Iran .
In lieu of a military counter-strike , the President said there will be even more sanctions placed on Iran until they ’ re ready to change their ways .
It was an ambiguous criteria to place on the Middle Eastern nation , but the implications were clear .
If they want prosperity and to reenter the world stage economically , they ’ ll need to end their nuclear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ We must all work together toward making a deal with Iran that makes the world a safer and more peaceful place , ” President Trump said .
The deal the President wants to negotiate is a real Iran Nuclear deal .
The old one has been abandoned , first in 2018 by President Trump and now officially by Iran , though they have never really fulfilled their end of the bargain fully .
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action ( JCPOA ) was ineffective from the beginning because it was brought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President Obama and former Secretary of State John Kerry continuously let the Iranians bully their way through the negotiations to the point that wording regarding their ability to test ballistic missiles went from a requirement to something the deal “ strongly encouraged.
” This is one of the reasons why Iran started balking and misdirecting nuclear inspectors almost immediately after the deal was signed .
Iran is on the path to ruins , whether at the hands of our military if they continue their attacks or as a result of crushing sanctions .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ own survival .
They must change their ways and come to the negotiating table .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
President Trump addressed the press and the nation in the White House Grand Foyer this morning, an unusual choice for a press conference about Iran. But it became clear this was a strategic move as the message was intended as much for Iran and the rest of the world as it was for the American people.
Following yesterday’s attack from Iran against airbases in Iraq that housed multiple allied nations’ military personnel, Iran declared they would not undertake further attacks as long as there was no counterattack. This hope seems to have been aided by the fact that Iran warned Iraq two hours before the attacks and were able to kill exactly zero people with 15 ballistics missiles. Plus, their choice of targets seems to indicate they had no intention of killing anyone. They wanted a display for their own people while, to whom state television has claimed 80 or more Americans were killed. But they didn’t want a counterattack, which very likely would have happened if they struck with purpose.
“As long as I am President of the United States, Iran will never have a nuclear weapons,” the President said to start his press conference. From there, it just got better for America and worse for Iran. In lieu of a military counter-strike, the President said there will be even more sanctions placed on Iran until they’re ready to change their ways. It was an ambiguous criteria to place on the Middle Eastern nation, but the implications were clear. If they want prosperity and to reenter the world stage economically, they’ll need to end their nuclear ambitions and stop
their terrorist proxy maneuvers.
“We must all work together toward making a deal with Iran that makes the world a safer and more peaceful place,” President Trump said. The deal the President wants to negotiate is a real Iran Nuclear deal. The old one has been abandoned, first in 2018 by President Trump and now officially by Iran, though they have never really fulfilled their end of the bargain fully.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was ineffective from the beginning because it was brought about from a position of weakness. President Obama and former Secretary of State John Kerry continuously let the Iranians bully their way through the negotiations to the point that wording regarding their ability to test ballistic missiles went from a requirement to something the deal “strongly encouraged.” This is one of the reasons why Iran started balking and misdirecting nuclear inspectors almost immediately after the deal was signed.
Iran is on the path to ruins, whether at the hands of our military if they continue their attacks or as a result of crushing sanctions. They have one path forward for their own survival. They must change their ways and come to the negotiating table.


noqreport--2020-01-08--Media malfeasance Part Deux

Media malfeasance Part Deux

Yesterday I wrote about the media attempting to lionize a bloodthirsty terrorist because Orange Man Bad .
That was just a small taste of what was to come .
Last night Iran lobbed some missles in the general direction of bases that house Americans and coalition forces Iraq .
When the news broke , I started cruising news channels and social media .
What I saw made me understand just how much the media hates the President .
The only confirmed deaths last night were 176 innocent people in a airplane that crashed taking off from Tehran .
The crash @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you watched many mainstream media channels last night , you would have thought 30 Americans had died .
How did outlets like MSNBC , CNN and the Washington Post get it so wrong ?
Don ’ t they have sources in the department of Defense and State Department ?
Of course they do .
However they decided to use reports from Iranian state media .
Really .
Iran state media .
Iran is the source these outlets used .
Many were specualting that Iran had missed their target on purpose in order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an American response .
This was the discussion on Fox by 9:15 PM because they relied on DOD sources indicating there were no American casualties .
But never fear .
An hour earlier , firefighter Chris Hayes reported what Iranian media was saying .
Here he is defending his decision to report the Iranian ’ s propaganda : Then CNN jumped on the disinformation train : And here is ABC ’ s Martha Raddatz in her head scarf carrying water for the regime who had just lobbed missles at US targets : I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But where is the context from ABC ?
It is certainly not on their Twitter feed .
By 9 PM January 7th , reports were coming from sources in the U.S. administration that there were no casualties .
Yet at about 8AM on January 8th , ABC shared this on their Twitter account without EVER sharing the reports that there were no American casualties : Not to be outdone , the Washignton Post decided to do a little moral equivalence .
Who do you believe ?
The U.S. government or Iran ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ but Tehran says ” really , just zip it .
If you need to see how Twitter lit up last night based on the media ’ s garbage reporting , you can scroll through the last 15 hours of tweets .
Clearly the media always thinks history started yesterday , but here are a few things that seem pretty evident : • The Iranian regime needed to save face so they tossed some missles in our general direction .
• President Trump has been quite restrained in responding to Iran ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • Iran killed an American and their Terrorist in Chief was turned to ash What is also clear is that the legacy media will report absolutely anything that makes the President look weak or wrong .
Including the rhetoric of the world ’ s largest state sponsor of terrorism .
This will only intensify between now and the election .
Select your sources carefully and stay vigilant .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Yesterday I wrote about the media attempting to lionize a bloodthirsty terrorist because Orange Man Bad. That was just a small taste of what was to come.
Last night Iran lobbed some missiles in the general direction of bases that house Americans and coalition forces Iraq. When the news broke, I started cruising news channels and social media. What I saw made me understand just how much the media hates the President. The only confirmed deaths last night were 176 innocent people in a airplane that crashed taking off from Tehran. The crash is still under investigation.
Yet if you watched many mainstream media channels last night, you would have thought 30 Americans had died. How did outlets like MSNBC, CNN and the Washington Post get it so wrong? Don’t they have sources in the department of Defense and State Department? Of course they do. However they decided to use reports from Iranian state media.
Really. Iran state media. Iran is the source these outlets used. Many were speculating that Iran had missed their target on purpose in order to save face at home while not drawing an American response. This was the discussion on Fox by 9:15 PM because they relied on DOD sources indicating there were no American casualties.
But never fear. An hour earlier, firefighter Chris Hayes reported what Iranian media was saying. Here he is defending his decision to report the Iranian’s propaganda:
Somehow you managed to cut out the part where I emphasized that that was Iranian state media and not verified. What a weird coincidence. https://t.co/qmjxlgsIJg pic.twitter.com/9GkJtDa56R — Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) January 8, 2020
Then CNN jumped on the disinformation train:
CNN: Video appears to show missiles hit airbase housing US troops. Network also says it can’t independently verify the video. So perhaps not broadcast it until it is verified? https://t.co/VGbTzg3UjW — Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) January 8, 2020
And here is ABC’s Martha Raddatz in her head scarf carrying water for the regime who had just lobbed missles at US targets:
IRAN ATTACKS U.S. MILITARY: @MarthaRaddatz is in Tehran where the Iranian military has launched what they are calling “Operation Martyr Soleimani,” firing missiles at U.S. military facilities in Iraq after vowing revenge for Qassem Soleimani's killing. https://t.co/zjLyq3Zezr pic.twitter.com/6e0d6cdeMg — World News Tonight (@ABCWorldNews) January 8, 2020
I get Raddatz has minders while in Iran. But where is the context from ABC? It is certainly not on their Twitter feed. By 9 PM January 7th, reports were coming from sources in the U.S. administration that there were no casualties. Yet at about 8AM on January 8th, ABC shared this on their Twitter account without EVER sharing the reports that there were no American casualties:
https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1214886457799839748
Not to be outdone, the Washignton Post decided to do a little moral equivalence. Who do you believe? The U.S. government or Iran? Seriously? Whenever you have to write “but Tehran says” really, just zip it.
No American casualties reported but Tehran claims dozens were killed https://t.co/m1EAWvt6aU — The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) January 8, 2020
If you need to see how Twitter lit up last night based on the media’s garbage reporting, you can scroll through the last 15 hours of tweets. Clearly the media always thinks history started yesterday, but here are a few things that seem pretty evident:
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.
The Iranian regime needed to save face so they tossed some missles in our general direction.
President Trump has been quite restrained in responding to Iran’s sabre rattling over the last year.
The President’s clear red line is killing Americans.
Iran killed an American and their Terrorist in Chief was turned to ash
What is also clear is that the legacy media will report absolutely anything that makes the President look weak or wrong. Including the rhetoric of the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism. This will only intensify between now and the election. Select your sources carefully and stay vigilant.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-08--The Iranian kerfuffle did WHAT to the oil markets?

As a trained market technician ( however not certified ) , the discussion of oil prices related to the recent Iran/US tit-a-tat is a source of great amusement .
For example the WSJ Editorial Board pontificated that the “ first Gulf War caused oil prices to nearly double in a few months.
” Curious .
Adherents to Ralph Nelson Elliott ’ s theory of markets had predicted that move , Gulf War or no .
Elliott Wave International has extensively documented the utter disconnect between news and stock prices .
My entertainment was amplified as I looked at the aftermarket @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It seems that the WSJ Op-Ed was written in the early evening as the attack was underway .
During those hours , USO did rise slightly less than 5 % from the daily market close .
But by the moment of this writing , it is down 1.4 % from the closing price .
It seems that something doesn ’ t add up .
I ’ ve been a victim of this phenomenon .
A couple of years ago I took an “ earnings trade ” in Netflix .
I thought I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the daily market closed , NFLX announced its earning .
The good news was amazing .
Not only did they earn more than the market analysts predicted , they earned more than their own bean counters predicted .
Happy days are here again !
But NFLX share price took a bath , and I got clobbered .
On good news !
EWI ’ s magnificent film , History ’ s Hidden Engine , clearly demonstrates that a number of market elements closely track large social mood .
And because of this , EWI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , notes that the 3-year stock market trend before the election is a very good predictor of the President ’ s re-election chances .
It also predicts the chances of his removal via impeachment .
We can be even more critical of market pundits .
On a daily basis we hear that “ because of X , Y happened.
” But those pundits refuse to participate in a challenge where they make predictions .
It would actually be quite simple .
There are a lot of scheduled economic announcements .
We can look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s regular statement that they will either raise , lower , or leave interest rates the same .
The Labor Department ’ s “ Non-Farm Payroll ” announcement is also on the calendar .
Pundits would make a set of predictions and hand them to a neutral third party .
What happens if the FOMC does any of the three possibilities .
Ditto for Non-Farm Payroll .
Predict the number of jobs .
Then assess the market response if they get it right , there are more jobs , or fewer jobs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is released to the public , open the predictions .
Post them on a public site .
Keep going for a number of months .
Once this data is in hand , we will know what credence to give the TV swamis .
After all , their record will be clear , and they can ’ t go backwards to “ correct the record.
” My guess is that they will all be shown to have less accuracy than darts thrown at the ticker tape .
Like last night .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
As a trained market technician (however not certified), the discussion of oil prices related to the recent Iran/US tit-a-tat is a source of great amusement. For example the WSJ Editorial Board pontificated that the “first Gulf War caused oil prices to nearly double in a few months.” Curious. Adherents to Ralph Nelson Elliott’s theory of markets had predicted that move, Gulf War or no. Elliott Wave International has extensively documented the utter disconnect between news and stock prices.
My entertainment was amplified as I looked at the aftermarket action of USO, the oil ETF. It seems that the WSJ Op-Ed was written in the early evening as the attack was underway. During those hours, USO did rise slightly less than 5% from the daily market close. But by the moment of this writing, it is down 1.4% from the closing price. It seems that something doesn’t add up.
I’ve been a victim of this phenomenon. A couple of years ago I took an “earnings trade” in Netflix. I thought I had properly divined the market. After the daily market closed, NFLX announced its earning. The good news was amazing. Not only did they earn more than the market analysts predicted, they earned more than their own bean counters predicted. Happy days are here again! But NFLX share price took a bath, and I got clobbered. On good news!
EWI’s magnificent film, History’s Hidden Engine, clearly demonstrates that a number of market elements closely track large social mood. And because of this, EWI’s companion institution, The Socionomist, notes that the 3-year stock market trend before the election is a very good predictor of the President’s re-election chances. It also predicts the chances of his removal via impeachment.
We can be even more critical of market pundits. On a daily basis we hear that “because of X, Y happened.” But those pundits refuse to participate in a challenge where they make predictions. It would actually be quite simple.
There are a lot of scheduled economic announcements. We can look at the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee’s regular statement that they will either raise, lower, or leave interest rates the same. The Labor Department’s “Non-Farm Payroll” announcement is also on the calendar.
Pundits would make a set of predictions and hand them to a neutral third party. What happens if the FOMC does any of the three possibilities. Ditto for Non-Farm Payroll. Predict the number of jobs. Then assess the market response if they get it right, there are more jobs, or fewer jobs than the prediction. After the data is released to the public, open the predictions. Post them on a public site. Keep going for a number of months.
Once this data is in hand, we will know what credence to give the TV swamis. After all, their record will be clear, and they can’t go backwards to “correct the record.” My guess is that they will all be shown to have less accuracy than darts thrown at the ticker tape. Like last night.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]