noqreport--2020-01-08--Evidence points to Iran taking Ukrainian plane down and covering it up

Editor ’ s Note : It ’ s often considered taboo to speculate in journalism , particularly in the face of nothing but circumstantial evidence .
That ’ s why I want to make it clear this is my opinion and not a news report , though many facts will be discussed in what follows .
Based on a slew of reports coming out of Iran and Ukraine , I believe it ’ s very likely the Ukrainian International Airlines Boeing 737 that crashed three minutes after takeoff from Tehran on route to Kyiv , Ukraine , was taken down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possible we will know the truth very quickly as both black boxes have been found by Iranian authorities .
Of course , it ’ s also possible the telemetry , communications recordings , and flight information does not come out intact ; if Tehran believes the information on the devices implicates them in taking the airliner down , they ’ re not going to admit to it .
Let ’ s take a look at the immediate information that has emerged about the crash .
It ’ s this information that drew me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not ready to make accusations at this point , but I will keep my belief that it is “ very likely ” Iran shot down the airliner until evidence sways me in one direction or the other .
Call this a conspiracy theory if you ’ d like , but even Ukraine withdrew their initial assessment of engine failure as President Zelensky has called his team to conduct a full investigation .
“ It was one of the best planes we had , with an amazing , reliable crew , ” the airline @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said at a briefing , choking back tears .
The Boeing 737-800 ( not the notorious 737 MAX 8 ) was three years old and had its last maintenance test two days before the crash .
These planes are designed to fly for decades .
A video posted by a BBC Iran Affairs Correspondent Ali Hashem allegedly shows the plane in the moments before it crashed .
It appears to be on fire throughout the video with a secondary explosion or flaring flames lighting up just prior to hitting the ground .
Here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mail that includes zoomed footage , demonstrating the plane was burning as it came down .
There was also an unverified report that eyewitnesses claimed there were two explosions heard before the plane hit the ground .
This alone does not indicate something external caused it like a missile strike or the plane hitting a small drone , but planes generally do not blow up in midair without cause .
Moreover , the sudden speed reduction does not jibe with a single engine catching fire .
When there ’ s engine trouble , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ landing .
Considering they were two minutes out from the airport , even one of the engines catching on fire would allow them to turn around and go back to the airport .
They certainly would have communicated their situation .
But instead , we see a sudden loss of speed and altitude indicative of an explosion .
But the only pieces of physical evidence made public so far are images that shows shrapnel damage indicative of air defense measures .
When news broke that the plane went down , the Ukrainian Embassy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ statement was rescinded and President Zelensky called on his Prosecutor General to begin a criminal investigation into the crash .
It seems likely Zelensky learned something that made his administration suspect it wasn ’ t just engine failure .
This is arguably the most damning piece of evidence pointing to an Iranian cover up .
Allegedly , these experienced pilots who were having “ engine failure ” did not communicate any problems to air traffic control .
In fact , they didn ’ t communicate anything at all according to Hassan Razaeifar , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Even during catastrophic engine failure , pilots will immediately communicate their situation to air traffic control .
Instant response from Iran about cause of crash The official response from Iran within an hour after the crash is that the one of the plane ’ s engines caught fire randomly , causing the experienced pilot to lose control and take the plane crashing to the ground quickly .
This account is not plausible .
Critics have questioned the Iranian account , calling it the “ fastest investigation in aviation history , ” according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s the black boxes Iran has recovered .
They aren ’ t giving them to Boeing , which is standard operating procedure .
They ’ re going to handle the boxes themselves .
Let ’ s not bypass the most obvious challenge to Iran ’ s story .
There aren ’ t many days when they are firing ballistic missiles at their enemies .
It ’ s been years since they ’ ve done anything close to what they did in their attack of Iraqi military bases yesterday .
This also means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their air defense operators poised to watch for an American counter attack .
Here ’ s my theory : Iran ordered air defense operators to take down any planes that weren ’ t scheduled to take off or land in Tehran .
The operators were given the schedules and flight plans of all incoming and outbound planes .
But this particular plane had a problem and was delayed by an hour , meaning its timing and flight path would not have matched what was on the list .
An missile operator saw the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the flight schedule , and followed orders .
That close to Tehran , they wouldn ’ t have much time to confirm anything .
It ’ s just a theory , and as theories go it ’ s light on evidence .
Some are speculating about the plane accidentally hitting a surveillance drone , of which there would have been many flying at the time .
Others are pointing to terrorism such as altitude-triggered bombs .
To me , the most likely scenario is someone thought the Americans were coming and fired @ @ @ @ @ @ @ really was just engine failure , but I ’ d say that ’ s less likely than Jeffrey Epstein killing himself .
Iran could clear it up by giving Boeing the black boxes .
But they won ’ t .
I ’ ll call it “ very likely ” they took down the Ukrainian plane .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Update: It has been confirmed by the Pentagon. Iran shot down the Ukrainian plane.
Original story:
Based on a slew of reports coming out of Iran and Ukraine, I believe it’s very likely the Ukrainian International Airlines Boeing 737 that crashed three minutes after takeoff from Tehran on route to Kyiv, Ukraine, was taken down inadvertently by Iran. It’s possible we will know the truth very quickly as both black boxes have been found by Iranian authorities. Of course, it’s also possible the telemetry, communications recordings, and flight information does not come out intact; if Tehran believes the information on the devices implicates them in taking the airliner down, they’re not going to admit to it.
Let’s take a look at the immediate information that has emerged about the crash. It’s this information that drew me to my conclusion. I’m not ready to make accusations at this point, but I will keep my belief that it is “very likely” Iran shot down the airliner until evidence sways me in one direction or the other. Call this a conspiracy theory if you’d like, but even Ukraine withdrew their initial assessment of engine failure as President Zelensky has called his team to conduct a full investigation.
Reliable plane and crew
“It was one of the best planes we had, with an amazing, reliable crew,” the airline’s president, Yevhen Dykhne, said at a briefing, choking back tears.
The Boeing 737-800 (not the notorious 737 MAX 8) was three years old and had its last maintenance test two days before the crash. These planes are designed to fly for decades.
Two explosions and shrapnel
A video posted by a BBC Iran Affairs Correspondent Ali Hashem allegedly shows the plane in the moments before it crashed. It appears to be on fire throughout the video with a secondary explosion or flaring flames lighting up just prior to hitting the ground.
Here’s the video enhanced by Daily Mail that includes zoomed footage, demonstrating the plane was burning as it came down.
There was also an unverified report that eyewitnesses claimed there were two explosions heard before the plane hit the ground. This alone does not indicate something external caused it like a missile strike or the plane hitting a small drone, but planes generally do not blow up in midair without cause. Moreover, the sudden speed reduction does not jibe with a single engine catching fire.
Speaking with an eye witness in Parand just now. They said that they heard two explosions before the UIA plane crashed to the ground. — Daniel Rád (@DanielKRad) January 8, 2020
When there’s engine trouble, planes generally maneuver to make an emergency landing. Considering they were two minutes out from the airport, even one of the engines catching on fire would allow them to turn around and go back to the airport. They certainly would have communicated their situation. But instead, we see a sudden loss of speed and altitude indicative of an explosion.
This plane maintained 275kts and over 7 thousand ft of altitude until loss of contact. If this was a “technical problem” flight data would have shown loss of altitude and air speed. This is a sudden catastrophe. https://t.co/E4VUrLIuIW pic.twitter.com/qLkDVqWsrj — Jared Carpenter (@jarheadjared14) January 8, 2020
But the only pieces of physical evidence made public so far are images that shows shrapnel damage indicative of air defense measures.
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!
One heck of Shrapnel Damage for Engine failure ! pic.twitter.com/ssPjFLNzIP — James Allan (@jamra3663) January 8, 2020
All evidence, including video, points to PS752 being shot down by a surface-to-air missile, burning up in mid air and falling to the ground. There's extensive damage on the plane that could've only been caused by shrapnel from a mid-air detonation. pic.twitter.com/TpsfUeM0u8 — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) January 8, 2020
Zelensky’s change of heart
When news broke that the plane went down, the Ukrainian Embassy issued a statement:
“According to preliminary data the plane crashed due to engine failure for technical reasons. As of now versions of terrorist attack or missile attack are ruled out.”
However, that statement was rescinded and President Zelensky called on his Prosecutor General to begin a criminal investigation into the crash. It seems likely Zelensky learned something that made his administration suspect it wasn’t just engine failure.
#BREAKING: Ukraine president says instructed prosecutor general to open criminal proceedings over iran air crash https://t.co/L3F3bnxDVu — Amichai Stein (@AmichaiStein1) January 8, 2020
“Missing” communication in last moments
This is arguably the most damning piece of evidence pointing to an Iranian cover up. Allegedly, these experienced pilots who were having “engine failure” did not communicate any problems to air traffic control. In fact, they didn’t communicate anything at all according to Hassan Razaeifar, the head of air crash investigation committee. Even during catastrophic engine failure, pilots will immediately communicate their situation to air traffic control.
Instant response from Iran about cause of crash
The official response from Iran within an hour after the crash is that the one of the plane’s engines caught fire randomly, causing the experienced pilot to lose control and take the plane crashing to the ground quickly. This account is not plausible.
Critics have questioned the Iranian account, calling it the “fastest investigation in aviation history,” according to Daily Mail.
Then, there’s the black boxes Iran has recovered. They aren’t giving them to Boeing, which is standard operating procedure. They’re going to handle the boxes themselves.
#Iran is refusing to hand over the black boxes found in the wreckage of the #ukrainianplane which crashed in #Tehran this morning. Meanwhile, #Ukraine has said that earlier statements on the cause of the crash were unofficial. https://t.co/xRBJXSbmTt — The Jerusalem Post (@Jerusalem_Post) January 8, 2020
Iranian missile operators were expecting air raids
Let’s not bypass the most obvious challenge to Iran’s story. There aren’t many days when they are firing ballistic missiles at their enemies. It’s been years since they’ve done anything close to what they did in their attack of Iraqi military bases yesterday.
This also means they were likely at full alert with their air defense operators poised to watch for an American counter attack.
“Nations, states, and central banks are quietly but rapidly shifting their money to precious metals. With bank runs, recession, CBDCs, and worse on the horizon, it’s easy to see why. NOW is the time to learn more about moving portions of your retirement or wealth to a self-directed gold and silver IRA through an America-First, Christian precious metals company.” – JD Rucker (not a financial advisor, just a guy who’s paying attention)
Here’s my theory: Iran ordered air defense operators to take down any planes that weren’t scheduled to take off or land in Tehran. The operators were given the schedules and flight plans of all incoming and outbound planes. But this particular plane had a problem and was delayed by an hour, meaning its timing and flight path would not have matched what was on the list. An missile operator saw the plane, noticed it wasn’t on the flight schedule, and followed orders. That close to Tehran, they wouldn’t have much time to confirm anything.
It’s just a theory, and as theories go it’s light on evidence. Some are speculating about the plane accidentally hitting a surveillance drone, of which there would have been many flying at the time. Others are pointing to terrorism such as altitude-triggered bombs. To me, the most likely scenario is someone thought the Americans were coming and fired.
There’s a chance it really was just engine failure, but I’d say that’s less likely than Jeffrey Epstein killing himself. Iran could clear it up by giving Boeing the black boxes. But they won’t. I’ll call it “very likely” they took down the Ukrainian plane.


noqreport--2020-01-09--Iran plane crash: Ukrainian investigators want to search crash site for Russian missile debris

Debris from the Ukrainian Boeing 737-800 that crashed in Iran early Wednesday morning may hold answers to the question of what brought the three-year-old plane down .
All 176 people on board died when it suddenly plummeted from the sky under questionable circumstances , a few hours after Iran launched a major strike against American forces in military bases in Iraq .
The official claim by Iran is that an engine fire brought down the plane two minutes out from Tehran .
But skeptics have wondered how Iran came to such a quick conclusion – an hour after the crash @ @ @ @ @ @ @ airline crash investigation in history.
” Ukraine initially posted a variation of Iran ’ s statement as their own stance , but quickly took it down after President Zelensky called for a full investigation into the incident .
Now , that investigation is looking into all possible theories , including the notion that an Iranian air defense system using Russian surface-to-air weapons took the plane down .
While publicly Ukrainian Secretary of the National Security Council Oleksiy Danylov is saying they are “ looking at various possible causes of the crash of an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attack , a collision , an engine explosion or terrorism , ” it seems as if their strongest working theory matches a theory we posted yesterday .
We suspect Iran inadvertently took down the plane because it took off late after a delay at the gate .
As or EIC noted , SAM operators were likely given a list of scheduled inbound and outbound flights and told to shoot down anything that wasn ’ t on the list as it was likely an American counter-strike .
With the Ukrainian plane departing almost an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an American bomber and brought down .
There ’ s an old saying in conspiracy theory circles that goes something like this : “ If you ’ re asking obvious questions mainstream media refuses to ask , you ’ re on the right track.
” A variation of that pertains to Big Tech ; when the likes of Google and Facebook suppress a particular story , it ’ s either wildly false or completely true .
Such is the case with a story our EIC posted yesterday regarding the Ukrainian plane that crashed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was a conspiracy theory that speculated Iran accidentally shot down the Ukrainian 737-800 shortly after takeoff near Tehran .
As conspiracy theories go , this one is relatively mild .
He wasn ’ t saying the earth is flat or Paul McCartney died in the 1960s and was replaced by a lookalike .
He put forth clear evidence that , at the very least , should get people asking serious questions .
At first , the story was exploding on Google and Facebook .
It was referenced in Wikipedia on the page about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of hours , it was “ disappeared ” faster than a Clinton accuser .
Now , searches on both platforms yield zip .
The story was deemed too conspiratorial and removed from prominence , though not completely removed from the index .
They didn ’ t take the story down .
They just buried it beneath a thousand other stories that were calling the crash an accident , stories that pretend like Iran withholding the two black boxes recovered from the debris is absolutely normal .
Stories that see nothing strange about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control that their engine was on fire .
Stories that ignore evidence of shrapnel indicative of a Russian SAM .
It ’ s unfortunate that most of mainstream media is buying Iran ’ s fishy claims of engine failure .
Thankfully , Ukraine isn ’ t buying it .
The downing of the Boeing 737-800 outside of Tehran must not be swept under the rug .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Update: It has been confirmed by the Pentagon. Iran shot down the Ukrainian plane.
Original Story:
Debris from the Ukrainian Boeing 737-800 that crashed in Iran early Wednesday morning may hold answers to the question of what brought the three-year-old plane down. All 176 people on board died when it suddenly plummeted from the sky under questionable circumstances, a few hours after Iran launched a major strike against American forces in military bases in Iraq.
The official claim by Iran is that an engine fire brought down the plane two minutes out from Tehran. But skeptics have wondered how Iran came to such a quick conclusion – an hour after the crash occurred – dubbing it “the fastest airline crash investigation in history.” Ukraine initially posted a variation of Iran’s statement as their own stance, but quickly took it down after President Zelensky called for a full investigation into the incident. Now, that investigation is looking into all possible theories, including the notion that an Iranian air defense system using Russian surface-to-air weapons took the plane down.
#BREAKING: "Ukrainian investigators want to search for debris of a Russian missile at the Iran plane crash site" – Ukrainian security chief qouted in Ukraine Interfax pic.twitter.com/xUWxvYVoo5 — Amichai Stein (@AmichaiStein1) January 9, 2020
While publicly Ukrainian Secretary of the National Security Council Oleksiy Danylov is saying they are “looking at various possible causes of the crash of an Ukrainian airliner, including a possible missile attack, a collision, an engine explosion or terrorism,” it seems as if their strongest working theory matches a theory we posted yesterday. We suspect Iran inadvertently took down the plane because it took off late after a delay at the gate. As or EIC noted, SAM operators were likely given a list of scheduled inbound and outbound flights and told to shoot down anything that wasn’t on the list as it was likely an American counter-strike. With the Ukrainian plane departing almost an hour late, it was mistaken for an American bomber and brought down.
Suppressed?
There’s an old saying in conspiracy theory circles that goes something like this: “If you’re asking obvious questions mainstream media refuses to ask, you’re on the right track.” A variation of that pertains to Big Tech; when the likes of Google and Facebook suppress a particular story, it’s either wildly false or completely true.
Such is the case with a story our EIC posted yesterday regarding the Ukrainian plane that crashed in Iran on Tuesday. The story was a conspiracy theory that speculated Iran accidentally shot down the Ukrainian 737-800 shortly after takeoff near Tehran. As conspiracy theories go, this one is relatively mild. He wasn’t saying the earth is flat or Paul McCartney died in the 1960s and was replaced by a lookalike. He put forth clear evidence that, at the very least, should get people asking serious questions.
At first, the story was exploding on Google and Facebook. It was referenced in Wikipedia on the page about the crash. But after a couple of hours, it was “disappeared” faster than a Clinton accuser. Now, searches on both platforms yield zip. The story was deemed too conspiratorial and removed from prominence, though not completely removed from the index.
They didn’t take the story down. They just buried it beneath a thousand other stories that were calling the crash an accident, stories that pretend like Iran withholding the two black boxes recovered from the debris is absolutely normal. Stories that see nothing strange about the pilots allegedly not mentioning to air traffic control that their engine was on fire. Stories that ignore evidence of shrapnel indicative of a Russian SAM.
All evidence, including video, points to PS752 being shot down by a surface-to-air missile, burning up in mid air and falling to the ground. There's extensive damage on the plane that could've only been caused by shrapnel from a mid-air detonation. pic.twitter.com/TpsfUeM0u8 — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) January 8, 2020
It’s unfortunate that most of mainstream media is buying Iran’s fishy claims of engine failure. Thankfully, Ukraine isn’t buying it. The downing of the Boeing 737-800 outside of Tehran must not be swept under the rug.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-09--Revisiting the link between leftism and Islamism

An enemy of the United States is dead but only the right is celebrating .
Meanwhile Leftists like Rose McGowan are mourning and Marxists like Colin Kaepernick are condemning America ’ s actions .
While Republicans celebrated the tactical military victory , Democrats in Congress like Ilhan Omar and Nancy Pelosi are , to put their reactions mildly , not .
It is my hope to provide an explanation for the left ’ s activities following the the death of Qasem Soleimani , Iran ’ s top general .
The leftist media has been shilling for Iran and not all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there is a much deeper ideological alliance at play .
The Justice Democrats are perhaps the most influential behind-the-scenes group in Democrat politics decisively moving the party further and further to the left .
Omar , Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , and Rashida Tliab are all from the Justice Democrats .
The group was founded by Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks , Kyle Kulinski who of Secular Talk , a TYT affiliate , and two former Bernie Sanders staffers .
The Young Turks is a media group named after the Islamist Turkish political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As one would expect , The Young Turks operates as an online Al Jazeera with venture funding of its own and promotion by YouTube , something conservative channels could never get .
The Council on American Islamic Relations operates as a propaganda outlet for the terror groups Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood .
National Review notes : It apologizes for terrorist groups : Challenged repeatedly to denounce Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist groups , CAIR denounces the acts of violence but not their sponsors .
It is connected to Hamas : Hamas , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and many other governments , indirectly created CAIR and the two groups remain tight .
Examples : In 1994 , CAIR head Nihad Awad publicly declared his support for Hamas ; the Holy Land Foundation ( HLF ) , a Hamas front group , contributed $ 5,000 to CAIR ; in turn , CAIR exploited the 9/11 attacks to raise money for HLF ; and , this past August , demonstrators at a CAIR-sponsored rally in Florida proclaimed “ We are Hamas !
” It settled a lawsuit : CAIR initiated a libel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a group called Anti-CAIR .
But two years later , CAIR settled the suit with prejudice ( meaning that it can not be reopened ) , implicitly acknowledging the accuracy of Anti-CAIR ’ s assertions , which included : • “ CAIR is a terrorist supporting front organization that is partially funded by terrorists ” ; • “ CAIR .
.
.
is supported by terrorist supporting individuals , groups and countries ” ; • “ CAIR has proven links to , and was founded by , Islamic terrorists ” ; and It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least seven board members or staff at CAIR have been arrested , denied entry to the U.S. , or were indicted on or pled guilty to ( or were convicted of ) terrorist charges : Siraj Wahhaj , Bassem Khafagi , Randall ( “ Ismail ” ) Royer , Ghassan Elashi , Rabih Haddad , Muthanna Al-Hanooti , and Nabil Sadoun .
It is in trouble with the law : Federal prosecutors in 2007 named CAIR ( along with two other Islamic organizations ) as “ unindicted co-conspirators and/or joint venturers ” in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In 2008 , the FBI ended contacts with CAIR because of concern about its continuing terrorist ties .
With all of this , CAIR is deeply supportive of leftism and socialism .
In addition to CAIR , we also have the Women ’ s March with cofounder Linda Sarsour , an Islamist feminist .
Bernie Sanders and Linda Sarsour were made for each other .
As my colleague noted in her article It ’ s a strange alliance for a Muslim to join forces with a nominal Jew .
Despite how the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law , they have made their bed with Islamists .
Even stranger , despite how Islam feels about many women and sexual deviancy , the Islamists have made their pact with the homosexual lobby instead of the social conservatives .
Why ?
The answer ought to be found in Europe .
The EU has seen the alliance of Islamist and socialists progress further .
Islam has been trying to invade Europe since before the political left-wing was ever a thing .
Through mass immigration , the cultural identities of European nations have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the last month has the UK solidified its desire for independence and national identity , but let ’ s note that the UK does not really have a right=wing , nor do most European nations .
Assimilation is almost nonexistent in European immigration practices as it compares to America .
Such gradual eroding of American culture is possible here , though the likes of CAIR will play a minor role with the country ’ s massive illegal immigration burden being the much larger flame .
In Europe , we see a post-Christendom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reigns in Europe , and has for some time .
But secularism has not succeeded in proving its longevity .
The majority of communist powers have collapsed .
The remaining ones are faltering .
North Korea has made a craven god out of its dictators .
Perhaps China has made the CCP or government in general the idol atop of preexisting Chinese spirituality which is more secular in comparison to the rest of the world .
Secularism also fails to be a permeating worldview .
Very few atheists are willing to take their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Richard Dawkins will admit that no god means no morality or meaning to life .
But this worldview is not sufficient for the masses .
Interestingly enough , Richard Dawkins sees Christianity as a practical means to defend Europe against Islam .
This goes to show how insufficient secularism is in the long term .
The Young Turks shows how secularism and Islamism are intertwined , but are the ideologies equal partners in their alliance .
Sure , Jeremy Corbyn , the British Bernie Sanders , benefited from such alliance , but can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Islam ?
Not in Europe .
So between three key factions in the identity confederacy that is the left , Islamists are dominant over the feminists and homosexuals .
This leaves the radicals , like Antifa , as the only distinguishable base that could impose its will .
The chances of Antifa ’ s ideology being dominant in the long run are dubious .
Once again , secularism is unsustainable .
On the left we see different ideologies that would want to destroy American culture , but it looks as though the socialists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oppressed class for their eventual revolution while the Islamists are patient drafting in Leftism ’ s wake .
This curious alliance of anti-American ideologies is the most intricate and difficult to explain , but its root is theological .
America was a nation founded on Christian principles .
Both secular leftism and Islamism reject these founding principles because they reject the ideology and the God who created them .
Thus , no matter how often Christians are compared to terrorists by leftists , the alliance remains for it is an alliance founded on @ @ @ @ @

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
An enemy of the United States is dead but only the right is celebrating. Meanwhile Leftists like Rose McGowan are mourning and Marxists like Colin Kaepernick are condemning America’s actions. While Republicans celebrated the tactical military victory, Democrats in Congress like Ilhan Omar and Nancy Pelosi are, to put their reactions mildly, not. It is my hope to provide an explanation for the left’s activities following the the death of Qasem Soleimani, Iran’s top general. The leftist media has been shilling for Iran and not all of it is usual partisanship. Indeed, there is a much deeper ideological alliance at play.
Justice Democrats
The Justice Democrats are perhaps the most influential behind-the-scenes group in Democrat politics decisively moving the party further and further to the left. Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Rashida Tliab are all from the Justice Democrats. The group was founded by Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks, Kyle Kulinski who of Secular Talk, a TYT affiliate, and two former Bernie Sanders staffers.
The Young Turks is a media group named after the Islamist Turkish political group that performed the Armenian Holocaust. As one would expect, The Young Turks operates as an online Al Jazeera with venture funding of its own and promotion by YouTube, something conservative channels could never get.
CAIR and Women’s March
The Council on American Islamic Relations operates as a propaganda outlet for the terror groups Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. National Review notes:
It apologizes for terrorist groups: Challenged repeatedly to denounce Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist groups, CAIR denounces the acts of violence but not their sponsors. It is connected to Hamas: Hamas, designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. and many other governments, indirectly created CAIR and the two groups remain tight. Examples: In 1994, CAIR head Nihad Awad publicly declared his support for Hamas; the Holy Land Foundation (HLF), a Hamas front group, contributed $5,000 to CAIR; in turn, CAIR exploited the 9/11 attacks to raise money for HLF; and, this past August, demonstrators at a CAIR-sponsored rally in Florida proclaimed “We are Hamas!” It settled a lawsuit: CAIR initiated a libel lawsuit in 2004 over five statements by a group called Anti-CAIR. But two years later, CAIR settled the suit with prejudice (meaning that it cannot be reopened), implicitly acknowledging the accuracy of Anti-CAIR’s assertions, which included: “CAIR is a terrorist supporting front organization that is partially funded by terrorists”; “CAIR . . . is supported by terrorist supporting individuals, groups and countries”; “CAIR has proven links to, and was founded by, Islamic terrorists”; and “CAIR actively supports terrorists and terrorist supporting groups and nations.” It includes individuals accused of terrorism: At least seven board members or staff at CAIR have been arrested, denied entry to the U.S., or were indicted on or pled guilty to (or were convicted of) terrorist charges: Siraj Wahhaj, Bassem Khafagi, Randall (“Ismail”) Royer, Ghassan Elashi, Rabih Haddad, Muthanna Al-Hanooti, and Nabil Sadoun. It is in trouble with the law: Federal prosecutors in 2007 named CAIR (along with two other Islamic organizations) as “unindicted co-conspirators and/or joint venturers” in a criminal conspiracy to support Hamas financially. In 2008, the FBI ended contacts with CAIR because of concern about its continuing terrorist ties.
With all of this, CAIR is deeply supportive of leftism and socialism. In addition to CAIR, we also have the Women’s March with cofounder Linda Sarsour, an Islamist feminist. Bernie Sanders and Linda Sarsour were made for each other. As my colleague noted in her article
One hates Jews. The other is a Jew. But that’s where real differences end and the unified alliance to all things anti-American can blossom as anti-Semitic activist Linda Sarsour has joined Bernie Sanders on the campaign trail.
It’s a strange alliance for a Muslim to join forces with a nominal Jew.
European Left
Despite how the left accuses Evangelicals of wanting Christian sharia law, they have made their bed with Islamists. Even stranger, despite how Islam feels about many women and sexual deviancy, the Islamists have made their pact with the homosexual lobby instead of the social conservatives. Why?
The answer ought to be found in Europe. The EU has seen the alliance of Islamist and socialists progress further. Islam has been trying to invade Europe since before the political left-wing was ever a thing. Through mass immigration, the cultural identities of European nations have been under attack and gradually eroded. Only in the last month has the UK solidified its desire for independence and national identity, but let’s note that the UK does not really have a right=wing, nor do most European nations. Assimilation is almost nonexistent in European immigration practices as it compares to America. Such gradual eroding of American culture is possible here, though the likes of CAIR will play a minor role with the country’s massive illegal immigration burden being the much larger flame.
The Role of Secularism
In Europe, we see a post-Christendom society with a dead church. Secularism reigns in Europe, and has for some time. But secularism has not succeeded in proving its longevity. The majority of communist powers have collapsed. The remaining ones are faltering. North Korea has made a craven god out of its dictators. Perhaps China has made the CCP or government in general the idol atop of preexisting Chinese spirituality which is more secular in comparison to the rest of the world.
Secularism also fails to be a permeating worldview. Very few atheists are willing to take their beliefs to their more logical conclusions. Richard Dawkins will admit that no god means no morality or meaning to life. But this worldview is not sufficient for the masses. Interestingly enough, Richard Dawkins sees Christianity as a practical means to defend Europe against Islam. This goes to show how insufficient secularism is in the long term.
Dr. Joseph Mercola said, “Synthetic meat is the epitome of ultraprocessed food, and it seems naïve to think it won’t have health effects similar to other ultraprocessed junk foods.” For All-American REAL beef raised in pastures, sous vide, then freeze-dried for long-term storage, visit Whole Cows and use promo code “no junk” at checkout.
Alpha Ideology?
The Young Turks shows how secularism and Islamism are intertwined, but are the ideologies equal partners in their alliance. Sure, Jeremy Corbyn, the British Bernie Sanders, benefited from such alliance, but can the homosexual lobby impose its will on Islam? Not in Europe. So between three key factions in the identity confederacy that is the left, Islamists are dominant over the feminists and homosexuals. This leaves the radicals, like Antifa, as the only distinguishable base that could impose its will. The chances of Antifa’s ideology being dominant in the long run are dubious. Once again, secularism is unsustainable. On the left we see different ideologies that would want to destroy American culture, but it looks as though the socialists believe they are using Muslims as an oppressed class for their eventual revolution while the Islamists are patient drafting in Leftism’s wake.
Conclusion
This curious alliance of anti-American ideologies is the most intricate and difficult to explain, but its root is theological. America was a nation founded on Christian principles. Both secular leftism and Islamism reject these founding principles because they reject the ideology and the God who created them. Thus, no matter how often Christians are compared to terrorists by leftists, the alliance remains for it is an alliance founded on the rejection of God.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-09--Child porn Tweet has people asking, ‘Is Paul Krugman a victim or a sicko?’

Progressive economist Paul Krugman Tweeted out an odd , now-deleted post earlier today claiming someone hacked his IP and downloaded child porn .
He believes it may be the work of QAnon , the pro-Trump internet group that promotes a plan to get the President and other Republicans reelected .
But some are wondering if Krugman ’ s Tweet was based on actual concern about a crime against him or just a preemptive ploy to get ahead of something he believes will be in the news soon .
It seems likely he ’ s a victim of a scam of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surprising considering his history of completely misunderstanding how the internet works .
He once famously predicted it would have as much of an effect on the economy as a fax machine .
Nevertheless , many are asking the question .
Is he a victim of a scam or a child porn fan ?
By going to Twitter and the NY Times instead of law enforcement , it would seem that Paul Krugman is either clueless when it comes to the internet and reporting a crime or he has something to hide .
Let @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an idiot .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Progressive economist Paul Krugman Tweeted out an odd, now-deleted post earlier today claiming someone hacked his IP and downloaded child porn. He believes it may be the work of QAnon, the pro-Trump internet group that promotes a plan to get the President and other Republicans reelected. But some are wondering if Krugman’s Tweet was based on actual concern about a crime against him or just a preemptive ploy to get ahead of something he believes will be in the news soon.
It seems likely he’s a victim of a scam of some sort, which isn’t surprising considering his history of completely misunderstanding how the internet works. He once famously predicted it would have as much of an effect on the economy as a fax machine. Nevertheless, many are asking the question. Is he a victim of a scam or a child porn fan?
This seems like a matter you send over to the FBI rather than post on Twitter dot com but then again I'm not a New York Times columnist so must be missing this galaxy brain thinking. https://t.co/K7HdJDHITP — Mike Cernovich (@Cernovich) January 8, 2020
New York Times columnist Paul Krugman claims in a tweet that his “IP address” had been hacked to download child pornography. https://t.co/avTN7DZfJ5 — Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) January 8, 2020
Why Paul Krugman Is Totally Not a Pedophile —@nytimes A1 1/9/20 https://t.co/c5NGSmcVCD — Michael Malice (@michaelmalice) January 8, 2020
Over the past 24 hours, Trump reestablished deterrence, the Covington kid beat CNN, Prince Harry retired from the Royal Family, and Paul Krugman is trying to explain how kiddie porn ended up on his computer. We still have 2 hours until "Backstage" goes live. — Michael Knowles (@michaeljknowles) January 8, 2020
If I found out someone downloaded child porn using my IP address I would immediately hire a lawyer, file a police report and call the FBI. I would NOT try to massage the PR problem on social media. Krugman is Unbelievable. — John Ocasio-Nolte (@NolteNC) January 9, 2020
Paul Krugman Tweets Phishy Story About Hackers Using His IP For Child Porn https://t.co/LmgPDnDSF9 via @gatewaypundit — Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) January 8, 2020
Judge: And why exactly are you in possession of child pornography? Paul Krugman: Because of Orange Man and Qanon. Judge: pic.twitter.com/sZmOHVYAjp — Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) January 8, 2020
Paul Krugman got hacked on his way back from Subway. — Bridget Phetasy (@BridgetPhetasy) January 8, 2020
I have no idea if Paul Krugman is lying or not. None at all. pic.twitter.com/tqhriaxBcs — John Cardillo (@johncardillo) January 9, 2020
Paul Krugman once wrote a column predicting that the internet's effect on the economy would be no greater than the fax machine's, so I guess it isn't surprising that he doesn't internet too good. https://t.co/7hkorcJf0P — James Hasson (@JamesHasson20) January 9, 2020
NY Times columnist Paul Krugman says hacker 'compromised' his IP address to 'download child pornography' https://t.co/ddUOVwR5nl — Mike Cernovich (@Cernovich) January 8, 2020
New York Times writer Paul Krugman claims his IP address has been used to download child pornography. He blamed Qanon for it. https://t.co/jecvfKeOOz — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) January 9, 2020
By going to Twitter and the NY Times instead of law enforcement, it would seem that Paul Krugman is either clueless when it comes to the internet and reporting a crime or he has something to hide. Let’s hope he’s just an idiot.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-09--Flag officer rage about Trump’s ‘failings’

Evidently what five-star General Douglas McArthur famously said in his farewell address at West Point is no longer true : “ Old soldiers never die ; they just fade away.
” Today ’ s “ old soldiers ” refuse to fade away .
Some of them are using their retired bully pulpits to criticize President Trump ’ s foreign policy decisions and by association defend their own failed leadership .
Recently retired General Dave Petraeus conducted an interview with Martha MacCallum , critical of President Trump ’ s decision to withdraw our troops from Syria .
Even former Secretary of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ General James Mattis is a critic .
In early January of 2020 , General Mattis was the keynote speaker at the annual Al Smith Dinner in New York City where he used the opportunity to take a swipe at President Trump who previously called Mattis “ the world ’ s most overrated general.
” Although Mattis is known for being very careful about his public statements regarding Mr. Trump , the general used his sense of humor to counterattack Trump ’ s recent criticism with the line : “ I ’ m honored @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] by Donald Trump because he also called Meryl Streep an overrated actress.
” He continued “ So , I guess I ’ m the Meryl Streep of generals.
” Jokes aside , in the past retired generals generally didn ’ t criticize the sitting president in part because of tradition but also because they remain subject to the Uniform Code Military Justice , and yes old soldiers can be called back to active duty and court-martialed , albeit rarely .
There is in fact a law ( UCMJ , Article 88 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disrespect to the president .
Mattis and Petraeus aren ’ t the only retired generals calling out the President , a possible dangerous break in tradition that could hurt the republic .
Earlier this month retired Admiral William McRaven wrote in The New York Times that our nation is under attack from within .
“ Last week I attended two memorable events that reminded me why we care so very much about this nation and also why our future may be in peril , ” Admiral McRaven , a former Navy SEAL , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ America is marked by “ an underlying current of frustration , humiliation , anger , and fear that echoed across the sidelines.
” And he continued , America is “ under attack , not from without , but from within.
” This was a swipe at the president .
Other retired flag officers joined the chorus of critics .
Retired General John Allen , once commander of American forces in Afghanistan , said events in Syria were “ completely foreseeable ” and Trump “ greenlighted ” Turkey ’ s recent invasion of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happens when Trump follows his instincts and because of his alignment with autocrats , ” Allen said .
Another retired four-star Army general , Stanley McChrystal , called Trump ’ s decision regarding the Kurds “ immoral ” and more recently retired Army General Joseph Votel , formerly the commander of U.S. Central Command , said Trump ’ s Syria abandonment of the Syrian Kurds “ threatens to undo five years ’ worth of fighting against ISIS and will severely damage American credibility and reliability in any future fights in which we need @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of all the four-star criticism of Mr. Trump ?
One could conclude that our national security decision-making is truly dysfunctional and that the nation is dangerously at risk .
That may be true .
Alternatively , one could conclude that Mr. Trump ’ s governing philosophy really rubs the retired military ’ s top brass in a very wrong way , which compels them to speak out .
After all , Mr. Trump is an unorthodox transactional leader who sees the world as having a malign impact on the United States .
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or morality to guide his foreign policy decisions ; rather he makes judgments based solely on American interests .
Remember his 2016 campaign slogan is “ Make America Great Again !
” President Trump ’ s record of putting America first is getting results .
He is as hard as nails with the communist Chinese , especially on trade .
It ’ s about time America has a leader who demands a fair deal from Beijing .
Mr. Trump rightly insists our NATO allies pay their fair share of the burden of defending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He wants to end our longest war in Afghanistan , exit Syria and reduce our footprint in many of the other endless wars across the world .
Perhaps best known is Mr. Trump ’ s promise to secure our border , which is happening in spite of the best efforts by the Democratic Party .
Evidently all this progress is bad in the eyes of some former commanders whose hands were behind our post-911 bad decisions to heavily invest America ’ s blood and treasure abroad in others ’ fights .
The growing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ evidently believe the president has abandoned America ’ s long-standing post-World War II sense of responsibility for international security – what Mr. Trump famously argues is acting as the world ’ s policeman , something he intends to quit .
Is that really so bad ?
Just maybe that ’ s what we must do to “ Make America Great Again !
” Mr. Trump campaigned on many issues and to most everyone ’ s surprise , he ’ s delivering on those promises .
I suppose the four-star officer critics who are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feel they must defend their past decisions against this unorthodox president ’ s unorthodox foreign policy approach much as the crazy congressional Democrats are blinded by their post-2016 election rage which compels them to seek to impeach this president no matter what and at the expense of much-needed legislation on important issues such as health care , illegal immigration , a failing infrastructure to name a few .
Retired U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Bob Maginnis graduated from the U.S. Military Academy , the Naval Postgraduate School , the Command & General Staff College @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Army War College ’ s strategy course .
He is an Airborne-Ranger infantry officer with service in four infantry divisions on three continents .
He is the author of nearly a thousand articles and five published books .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Evidently what five-star General Douglas McArthur famously said in his farewell address at West Point is no longer true: “Old soldiers never die; they just fade away.” Today’s “old soldiers” refuse to fade away. Some of them are using their retired bully pulpits to criticize President Trump’s foreign policy decisions and by association defend their own failed leadership.
Recently retired General Dave Petraeus conducted an interview with Martha MacCallum, critical of President Trump’s decision to withdraw our troops from Syria.
Even former Secretary of Defense under Trump and retired Marine Corps General James Mattis is a critic. In early January of 2020, General Mattis was the keynote speaker at the annual Al Smith Dinner in New York City where he used the opportunity to take a swipe at President Trump who previously called Mattis “the world’s most overrated general.” Although Mattis is known for being very careful about his public statements regarding Mr. Trump, the general used his sense of humor to counterattack Trump’s recent criticism with the line: “I’m honored to be considered that [overrated general] by Donald Trump because he also called Meryl Streep an overrated actress.” He continued “So, I guess I’m the Meryl Streep of generals.”
Jokes aside, in the past retired generals generally didn’t criticize the sitting president in part because of tradition but also because they remain subject to the Uniform Code Military Justice, and yes old soldiers can be called back to active duty and court-martialed, albeit rarely. There is in fact a law (UCMJ, Article 88, Contempt Toward Officials) that prohibits showing disrespect to the president.
Mattis and Petraeus aren’t the only retired generals calling out the President, a possible dangerous break in tradition that could hurt the republic. Earlier this month retired Admiral William McRaven wrote in The New York Times that our nation is under attack from within. “Last week I attended two memorable events that reminded me why we care so very much about this nation and also why our future may be in peril,” Admiral McRaven, a former Navy SEAL, wrote in the Times. He said America is marked by “an underlying current of frustration, humiliation, anger, and fear that echoed across the sidelines.” And he continued, America is “under attack, not from without, but from within.” This was a swipe at the president.
Other retired flag officers joined the chorus of critics. Retired General John Allen, once commander of American forces in Afghanistan, said events in Syria were “completely foreseeable” and Trump “greenlighted” Turkey’s recent invasion of the Kurdish northeast. “This is what happens when Trump follows his instincts and because of his alignment with autocrats,” Allen said.
Another retired four-star Army general, Stanley McChrystal, called Trump’s decision regarding the Kurds “immoral” and more recently retired Army General Joseph Votel, formerly the commander of U.S. Central Command, said Trump’s Syria abandonment of the Syrian Kurds “threatens to undo five years’ worth of fighting against ISIS and will severely damage American credibility and reliability in any future fights in which we need strong allies.”
What should we make of all the four-star criticism of Mr. Trump? One could conclude that our national security decision-making is truly dysfunctional and that the nation is dangerously at risk. That may be true.
Alternatively, one could conclude that Mr. Trump’s governing philosophy really rubs the retired military’s top brass in a very wrong way, which compels them to speak out. After all, Mr. Trump is an unorthodox transactional leader who sees the world as having a malign impact on the United States. That means he relies on no particular philosophy or morality to guide his foreign policy decisions; rather he makes judgments based solely on American interests. Remember his 2016 campaign slogan is “Make America Great Again!”
President Trump’s record of putting America first is getting results. He is as hard as nails with the communist Chinese, especially on trade. It’s about time America has a leader who demands a fair deal from Beijing. Mr. Trump rightly insists our NATO allies pay their fair share of the burden of defending that continent against the Russian threat. He wants to end our longest war in Afghanistan, exit Syria and reduce our footprint in many of the other endless wars across the world. Perhaps best known is Mr. Trump’s promise to secure our border, which is happening in spite of the best efforts by the Democratic Party. Evidently all this progress is bad in the eyes of some former commanders whose hands were behind our post-911 bad decisions to heavily invest America’s blood and treasure abroad in others’ fights.
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.
The growing covey of malcontent retired four-star flag officers evidently believe the president has abandoned America’s long-standing post-World War II sense of responsibility for international security – what Mr. Trump famously argues is acting as the world’s policeman, something he intends to quit. Is that really so bad? Just maybe that’s what we must do to “Make America Great Again!”
Mr. Trump campaigned on many issues and to most everyone’s surprise, he’s delivering on those promises. I suppose the four-star officer critics who are invested in decades of questionable foreign entanglements feel they must defend their past decisions against this unorthodox president’s unorthodox foreign policy approach much as the crazy congressional Democrats are blinded by their post-2016 election rage which compels them to seek to impeach this president no matter what and at the expense of much-needed legislation on important issues such as health care, illegal immigration, a failing infrastructure to name a few.
Retired U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Bob Maginnis graduated from the U.S. Military Academy, the Naval Postgraduate School, the Command & General Staff College, the Defense Language School and the Army War College’s strategy course. He is an Airborne-Ranger infantry officer with service in four infantry divisions on three continents. He is the author of nearly a thousand articles and five published books.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-09--Confirmed: Iran took down Ukrainian plane, likely by mistake

There ’ s little solace that comes in being proven correct when the implications are so terrible .
My “ conspiracy theory ” from yesterday that Google and Facebook decided to suppress has been confirmed by Pentagon sources to Newsweek .
Unless Big Tech believes reporters at the long-time mainstream media outlet are all wearing tinfoil hats , it ’ s time to stop pretending like the story needs to be hidden .
Iran shot down the Ukrainian plane early Wednesday morning .
Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 , a Boeing 737–800 en route from Tehran Imam Khomeini International Airpot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was delayed an hour at the gate .
This , I believe , is why it was shot down .
Iranian surface-to-air missile ( SAM ) operators were likely given a schedule and flight paths of inbound and outbound aircraft .
Because this one was delayed , it didn ’ t match what the operators had on their lists , so they erred on the side of “ caution ” and assumed it was an American retaliation for the missile attack on Iraqi bases a couple of hours before .
Iran continues to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , causing the plane to crash .
But they came to this conclusion within an hour of the crash , which would make it the shortest plane crash investigation in history .
They also noted that communication from the pilots ended before any troubles were reported .
Then , after the two black boxes were recovered , they said they would not be handing them over to Boeing , the United States , Ukraine , or anyone else .
Ukraine initially echoed their storyline , but rescinded it quickly as President Zelensky announced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the incident .
A few hours ago , they requested to have access to the crash area and all debris that had been collected so they could search for indications of Russian missiles , which Iran uses for their air defense systems .
This changes the dynamic of Iran ’ s negotiating power .
They ( likely ) inadvertently killed 176 people , then tried to cover it up .
Now , the denial and finger-pointing portion of the Middle East ’ s escapades begins , and it won ’ t be pretty @

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
There’s little solace that comes in being proven correct when the implications are so terrible. My “conspiracy theory” from yesterday that Google and Facebook decided to suppress has been confirmed by Pentagon sources to Newsweek. Unless Big Tech believes reporters at the long-time mainstream media outlet are all wearing tinfoil hats, it’s time to stop pretending like the story needs to be hidden. Iran shot down the Ukrainian plane early Wednesday morning.
Newsweek is reporting that an Iranian missile took down the Ukraine flighthttps://t.co/QrgNE5sBlx — Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) January 9, 2020
Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752, a Boeing 737–800 en route from Tehran Imam Khomeini International Airpot to Kyiv’s Boryspil International Airport was delayed an hour at the gate. This, I believe, is why it was shot down. Iranian surface-to-air missile (SAM) operators were likely given a schedule and flight paths of inbound and outbound aircraft. Because this one was delayed, it didn’t match what the operators had on their lists, so they erred on the side of “caution” and assumed it was an American retaliation for the missile attack on Iraqi bases a couple of hours before.
Iran continues to report that an engine caught on fire, causing the plane to crash. But they came to this conclusion within an hour of the crash, which would make it the shortest plane crash investigation in history. They also noted that communication from the pilots ended before any troubles were reported. Then, after the two black boxes were recovered, they said they would not be handing them over to Boeing, the United States, Ukraine, or anyone else.
Ukraine initially echoed their storyline, but rescinded it quickly as President Zelensky announced he wanted a full criminal investigation into the incident. A few hours ago, they requested to have access to the crash area and all debris that had been collected so they could search for indications of Russian missiles, which Iran uses for their air defense systems.
This changes the dynamic of Iran’s negotiating power. They (likely) inadvertently killed 176 people, then tried to cover it up. Now, the denial and finger-pointing portion of the Middle East’s escapades begins, and it won’t be pretty.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-09--President Trump’s handling of Iran is historic foreign policy unfolding before our eyes

Let me make one thing crystal clear .
I support President Trump , but I ’ m not a sycophant who blindly supports everything he does or believes he ’ s above reproach .
I call it how I see it , which is why I have no problem criticizing some of his biggest moves .
The bump stock ban and the gargantuan budgets he ’ s been signing come to mind .
With that said , I believe his handling of the Middle East in general and Iran in particular have been unexpectedly brilliant .
He ’ s proven @ @ @ @ @ @ @ every progressive ) wrong on multiple occasions .
Syria isn ’ t a Turkish state after the President pulled back troops .
Withdrawing from Afghanistan is finally looking like it ’ s going to happen .
The Islamic State is essentially gone , at least militarily .
And Iran has been humbled , at least as much as the egotistical authoritarian leadership in Tehran can be humbled in the eyes of the world .
There are still tremendous risks .
One of the biggest is coming not from foreign soil but from Capitol @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resolutions are in play in the House and Senate .
Even though they are not designed to put the weight of the law behind them , they send the wrong message to Iran that could embolden them to resume their violent actions against Americans .
On top of that , the press outside of Iran has not been flattering .
If there ’ s one way to enrage a proud nation ’ s leadership , it ’ s to make them look bad .
It ’ s not out of the question that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deescalation , they may go in the other direction .
But if there ’ s one thing I ’ ve learned over the last three years , it ’ s that the President has been more right than wrong when it comes to the Middle East .
His moves have worked despite objections from pundits and politicians on both sides of the aisle .
He was heavily denounced for moving the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem .
Breathless journalists , unhinged Democrats , and pro-Palestinian groups around the world said the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Israel would be ushered into a state of complete turmoil within weeks .
Then it was months .
Now , over two years after the announcement , not much has changed in Israel .
Those who hated them still hate them and those who love them still love them .
Killing Qasem Soleimani is quickly turning into an action more consequential than the killing of former ISIS leader Alu Bakr al-Baghdadi or even Osama bin Laden .
It ’ s not that Soleimani was more prolific than the other two , but by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leaders down , their organizations were already in shambles .
They were important symbolic killings and nothing more .
But Soleimani was running things .
In fact , rumors from Iran seem to indicate he may have been the linchpin in Iran ’ s Middle East domination plan .
If Iran doesn ’ t do anything stupid , then the series of events following the rocket attack that killed an American contractor on December 27 , 2019 , until the President ’ s press conference yesterday will go down in history as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It was the type of scenario that would have been handled very differently by others .
President Obama may have paid Iran to stop bullying us .
President Cheney ( I mean Bush ) may have invaded them in search of figments of mass destructive imagination .
President Clinton would likely have paid them , then bombed them , then paid them again .
And I ’ m partially joking about all three hypothetical presidential reactions .
President Kennedy stopped a nuclear war .
President Reagan caused the Soviet Union to collapse .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ same accolades today for his Middle East maneuvers because we ’ re seeing it unfold slowly , but history will look back in awe .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Let me make one thing crystal clear. I support President Trump, but I’m not a sycophant who blindly supports everything he does or believes he’s above reproach. I call it how I see it, which is why I have no problem criticizing some of his biggest moves. The bump stock ban and the gargantuan budgets he’s been signing come to mind.
With that said, I believe his handling of the Middle East in general and Iran in particular have been unexpectedly brilliant. He’s proven me (and other conservatives along with every progressive) wrong on multiple occasions. Syria isn’t a Turkish state after the President pulled back troops. Withdrawing from Afghanistan is finally looking like it’s going to happen. The Islamic State is essentially gone, at least militarily. And Iran has been humbled, at least as much as the egotistical authoritarian leadership in Tehran can be humbled in the eyes of the world.
There are still tremendous risks. One of the biggest is coming not from foreign soil but from Capitol Hill as two symbolic Iran War Powers resolutions are in play in the House and Senate. Even though they are not designed to put the weight of the law behind them, they send the wrong message to Iran that could embolden them to resume their violent actions against Americans. On top of that, the press outside of Iran has not been flattering. If there’s one way to enrage a proud nation’s leadership, it’s to make them look bad. It’s not out of the question that despite President Trump’s gestures towards deescalation, they may go in the other direction.
But if there’s one thing I’ve learned over the last three years, it’s that the President has been more right than wrong when it comes to the Middle East. His moves have worked despite objections from pundits and politicians on both sides of the aisle. He was heavily denounced for moving the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Breathless journalists, unhinged Democrats, and pro-Palestinian groups around the world said the move would so destabilize the region, Israel would be ushered into a state of complete turmoil within weeks. Then it was months. Now, over two years after the announcement, not much has changed in Israel. Those who hated them still hate them and those who love them still love them.
Killing Qasem Soleimani is quickly turning into an action more consequential than the killing of former ISIS leader Alu Bakr al-Baghdadi or even Osama bin Laden. It’s not that Soleimani was more prolific than the other two, but by the time American forces took the two leaders down, their organizations were already in shambles. They were important symbolic killings and nothing more. But Soleimani was running things. In fact, rumors from Iran seem to indicate he may have been the linchpin in Iran’s Middle East domination plan.
A.Khamenei has invited the commanders of all proxies to Tehran today.He wants to organise them under the command of his son&new commander of Quds force. However,highly unlikely groups’d listen to Khamenei because they were loyal to Soleimani. Shia crescent is unofficially dead. https://t.co/Tg3K3dT3nm — Raman Ghavami (@Raman_Ghavami) January 9, 2020
It's even better.. pic.twitter.com/HAHaJS84R0 — Patchfarmstead, Sus Scrofa is Latin for yum. ? (@patchfarmstead) January 9, 2020
If Iran doesn’t do anything stupid, then the series of events following the rocket attack that killed an American contractor on December 27, 2019, until the President’s press conference yesterday will go down in history as a masterclass for statesmen on foreign affairs. It was the type of scenario that would have been handled very differently by others. President Obama may have paid Iran to stop bullying us. President Cheney (I mean Bush) may have invaded them in search of figments of mass destructive imagination. President Clinton would likely have paid them, then bombed them, then paid them again. And I’m partially joking about all three hypothetical presidential reactions.
President Kennedy stopped a nuclear war. President Reagan caused the Soviet Union to collapse. President Trump won’t get the same accolades today for his Middle East maneuvers because we’re seeing it unfold slowly, but history will look back in awe.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-09--Appeals court win: 5th Circuit lifts injunction on military funds used to build border wall

The legal back and forth surrounding President Trump ’ s wall on our southern border ebbed in favor of the right late Wednesday as the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals lifted an injunction on the use of military construction funds .
Now , construction can resume until those who are challenging border security efforts can appeal the case to the Supreme Court .
In a split-ruling , two 5th Circuit judges appointed by Republican presidents outvoted the lone Democrat-appointee to lift the injunction placed on wall construction by Judge David Briones of the U.S. District Court for the Western District @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had ruled use of the funds was an overreach , as argued by representatives of El Paso County and Border Network for Human Rights , a local illegal immigrants rights group .
The argument that the President doesn ’ t have the authority to use military construction funds to defend our border is ludicrous .
Defending our land from foreign invaders is literally the military ’ s primary function .
As a nation , we rightly differentiate between immigration enforcement and foreign incursions , but the fact the border wall helps prevent both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should prohibit military funds from building it .
One of the biggest sticking points of the last two years has been the Democrats ’ insistence on keeping the borders as open as possible .
Efforts by the administration though both border security and negotiations with other countries , particularly Mexico , have slowed border breaches in recent months .
But we must not be complacent and disregard the need for an effective wall .
Whether leftists want to admit it or not , they ’ re effective .
This win will help get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ may not be enough to get the whole wall built and there ’ s not enough time to get the border completely secure before the next election , but that ’ s not necessarily a bad thing for Republicans .
It reinforces the need to keep President Trump in the White House , a Senate majority , and to retake control of the House of Representatives .
At this point , we ’ ll take any win we can get .
This bodes well for border security fans who have been pushing for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Will the Supreme Court uphold this ruling ?
Let ’ s hope and pray they do .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
The legal back and forth surrounding President Trump’s wall on our southern border ebbed in favor of the right late Wednesday as the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals lifted an injunction on the use of military construction funds. Now, construction can resume until those who are challenging border security efforts can appeal the case to the Supreme Court.
Breaking News: The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals just reversed a lower court decision & gave us the go ahead to build one of the largest sections of the desperately needed Southern Border Wall, Four Billion Dollars. Entire Wall is under construction or getting ready to start! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 9, 2020
In a split-ruling, two 5th Circuit judges appointed by Republican presidents outvoted the lone Democrat-appointee to lift the injunction placed on wall construction by Judge David Briones of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas last month. The judge had ruled use of the funds was an overreach, as argued by representatives of El Paso County and Border Network for Human Rights, a local illegal immigrants rights group.
Appeals court lifts order blocking Trump from using military funds for border wall https://t.co/bhGmw5GBWP — Kelly Hancock (@KHancock4TX) January 9, 2020
The argument that the President doesn’t have the authority to use military construction funds to defend our border is ludicrous. Defending our land from foreign invaders is literally the military’s primary function. As a nation, we rightly differentiate between immigration enforcement and foreign incursions, but the fact the border wall helps prevent both does not make it an overreach that should prohibit military funds from building it.
One of the biggest sticking points of the last two years has been the Democrats’ insistence on keeping the borders as open as possible. Efforts by the administration though both border security and negotiations with other countries, particularly Mexico, have slowed border breaches in recent months. But we must not be complacent and disregard the need for an effective wall. Whether leftists want to admit it or not, they’re effective.
This win will help get much more wall built quickly. It may not be enough to get the whole wall built and there’s not enough time to get the border completely secure before the next election, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing for Republicans. It reinforces the need to keep President Trump in the White House, a Senate majority, and to retake control of the House of Representatives.
At this point, we’ll take any win we can get. This bodes well for border security fans who have been pushing for wall construction since before the 2016 election. Will the Supreme Court uphold this ruling? Let’s hope and pray they do.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-09--Symbolic Iran War Powers resolutions are begging Iran to attack Americans

Democrats in both chambers of Congress are pushing forward an Iranian War Powers resolution that would appear to hamper the President ’ s authority to engage with Iran in case they attack .
As a concurrent resolution , it technically wouldn ’ t do anything at all ; the President is able and likely willing to ignore it altogether .
But some won ’ t ignore it , namely Tehran .
They will see it as a weakening of the President ’ s authority and an opportunity to do what they will .
As a concurrent resolution for the House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it has as much force of law behind it as a condemning Tweet .
This is 100 % a political publicity stunt intended to confuse voters who aren ’ t up on their civics .
It won ’ t be pushed as a joint resolution because doing so means it would have to be signed by the President , which he , of course , would not .
But if it were pushed as a joint resolution , there is less of a chance that the current Republican defectors – Senators Rand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three or four others – would be willing to stand on that particular hill .
The fact that the resolutions are meaningless enables them to take the ideological high road , which is exactly what Democrats want .
Pelosi to Push Bill Limiting Trump ’ s Power in Confrontation with Iran , Now Over Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell ( R-KY ) criticized Pelosi in a floor speech Wednesday for blaming the Trump administration Tuesday night , rather than Iran , for the confrontation — while U.S. troops were under fire .
Pelosi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Administration ” and suggested the U.S. could not “ afford ” war .
She said Wednesday that the Democrats ’ resolution may include a proposal introduced by Rep. Ro Khanna ( D-CA ) and Sen. Bernie Sanders ( I-VT ) to defund any U.S. military action against Iran — effectively signaling surrender .
Their goal is to two-fold : to embarrass the President with bipartisan opposition to his engagements with Iran and to have an “ I told you so ” card if President Trump orders similar strikes like the one that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Unfortunately , it may be a self-fulfilling prophecy with their second goal .
Iran will view passage of the resolutions as signs of weakness and fading support for President Trump .
They ’ ll attempt to push the boundaries to draw the President into conflict with them .
Such conflict will bring him into further conflict with Democrats .
The opposition party in the United States is currently opposed for the sake of opposing .
The President made it clear with both his restraint following Iran ’ s attacks on Tuesday as well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wants to pursue peace .
The Democrats aren ’ t satisfied with peace as long as it ’ s a feather in the President ’ s cap , so they ’ re pushing their own agenda to mislead voters into thinking they ’ re the only thing preventing President Trump from starting another unpopular Middle East war .
There ’ s a third minor reason this is being pushed forward in the House by Speaker Nancy Pelosi .
It ’ s a reward and a bump for the resolution sponsor , Representative Elissa @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her support for impeachment .
Her swing district has been upset by her voting for the Articles of Impeachment .
By pushing her to the national stage , even if only briefly and symbolically , it could help the freshman Congresswoman in this year ’ s MI-08 election .
As impotent as it may be , the Iran War Powers resolutions will embolden Iran .
Their proxies will increase attacks .
Their propaganda and cyberattacking mechanisms will go into overdrive .
Democrats are giving Iran exactly what they want .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Democrats in both chambers of Congress are pushing forward an Iranian War Powers resolution that would appear to hamper the President’s authority to engage with Iran in case they attack. As a concurrent resolution, it technically wouldn’t do anything at all; the President is able and likely willing to ignore it altogether. But some won’t ignore it, namely Tehran. They will see it as a weakening of the President’s authority and an opportunity to do what they will.
As a concurrent resolution for the House and Senate, not a joint resolution, it has as much force of law behind it as a condemning Tweet. This is 100% a political publicity stunt intended to confuse voters who aren’t up on their civics. It won’t be pushed as a joint resolution because doing so means it would have to be signed by the President, which he, of course, would not. But if it were pushed as a joint resolution, there is less of a chance that the current Republican defectors – Senators Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and possibly three or four others – would be willing to stand on that particular hill. The fact that the resolutions are meaningless enables them to take the ideological high road, which is exactly what Democrats want.
Pelosi to Push Bill Limiting Trump’s Power in Confrontation with Iran, Now Over Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) criticized Pelosi in a floor speech Wednesday for blaming the Trump administration Tuesday night, rather than Iran, for the confrontation — while U.S. troops were under fire. Pelosi had tweeted against “needless provocations from the Administration” and suggested the U.S. could not “afford” war. She said Wednesday that the Democrats’ resolution may include a proposal introduced by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) to defund any U.S. military action against Iran — effectively signaling surrender.
Their goal is to two-fold: to embarrass the President with bipartisan opposition to his engagements with Iran and to have an “I told you so” card if President Trump orders similar strikes like the one that took out Quds leader Qasem Soleimani. Unfortunately, it may be a self-fulfilling prophecy with their second goal. Iran will view passage of the resolutions as signs of weakness and fading support for President Trump. They’ll attempt to push the boundaries to draw the President into conflict with them. Such conflict will bring him into further conflict with Democrats.
The opposition party in the United States is currently opposed for the sake of opposing. The President made it clear with both his restraint following Iran’s attacks on Tuesday as well as his press conference Wednesday that he wants to pursue peace. The Democrats aren’t satisfied with peace as long as it’s a feather in the President’s cap, so they’re pushing their own agenda to mislead voters into thinking they’re the only thing preventing President Trump from starting another unpopular Middle East war.
There’s a third minor reason this is being pushed forward in the House by Speaker Nancy Pelosi. It’s a reward and a bump for the resolution sponsor, Representative Elissa Slotkin, who has been dogged by her support for impeachment. Her swing district has been upset by her voting for the Articles of Impeachment. By pushing her to the national stage, even if only briefly and symbolically, it could help the freshman Congresswoman in this year’s MI-08 election.
As impotent as it may be, the Iran War Powers resolutions will embolden Iran. Their proxies will increase attacks. Their propaganda and cyberattacking mechanisms will go into overdrive. Democrats are giving Iran exactly what they want.
American Conservative Movement
As we prepare for the 2020 election, we are joining with fellow patriots to form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We will focus on two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats from winning elections and promoting strong conservative candidates wherever they are viable. After the election, we will shift to focusing on educating America about the tenets of conservatism. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-10--Ted Cruz offers Democrats a chance to prove they’re still patriotic Americans

The death of Qasem Soleimani in an airstrike by U.S. military forces on the order of President Trump last week should be as unambiguously positive for America as the killing of Osama bin Laden .
In fact , one can argue Soleimani ’ s death was more consequential as he was still the driving force behind both militia opposition and state-funded terrorists working on behalf of Iran to kill Americans .
Both bin Laden and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi , the former leader of the Islamic State , were killed when their powers had already slipped away .
But appreciation of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be much harder to find than it should be .
Most Democrats and a handful of Republicans on Capitol Hill have expressed concerns over the killing of a man who was responsible for at least 603 American deaths and countless people across the Middle East .
Why ?
For most Democrats , it ’ s all about politics .
Unlike Republicans who universally supported the killing of bin Laden , Democrats view everything as partisan fodder .
If President Trump makes any move at all , Democrats in DC will oppose it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to it , their motivation is a leaning towards libertarian ideals of non-intervention .
They want our military to never be engaged anywhere abroad at any time .
Senator Ted Cruz and 42 Republican cosponsors released a resolution praising the military and intelligence personnel involved in taking down Soleimani , as well as the President for ordering the strike .
The resolution is modeled on a resolution unanimously supported by the U.S. Senate in 2011 , after American forces killed Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden .
“ At a time when partisanship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , President Trump and his administration should be commended for bringing an end to Qasem Soleimani , a terrorist responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people across the Middle East , including at least 603 American service members , ” Sen. Cruz said .
“ Just as we did in 2011 following the killing of Bin Laden , it is my hope my colleagues in the Senate will come together once again to honor all those involved in this successful mission to defend America ’ s national security interests and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kills Americans and is actively working to kill more is a threat who needs to be removed by any means necessary .
This used to be a stance just about everyone could agree on , including Democrats and Libertarians , for one simple reason : To do otherwise is to risk the future of our nation by putting our men and women abroad at risk .
Soleimani made it clear he intended to have as much American blood on his hands as possible .
How does anyone in Washington DC object to his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the floor , will give every Senator an opportunity to answer a simple question : Are the really patriotic Americans or do they put political expediency over patriotism ?
Democrats will likely demonstrate they are the partisan hacks they ’ ve become in recent years .
As for Republicans who have voiced concern over the President ’ s order , they should be able to put down their qualms for just a moment and commend those who helped take down arguably the greatest threat to American security and American lives abroad .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Osama bin Laden was universal in the Senate even though he was impotent at the time .
Qasem Soleimani was a threat until the moment his life ended .
Appreciation of his death should be universal as well .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
The death of Qasem Soleimani in an airstrike by U.S. military forces on the order of President Trump last week should be as unambiguously positive for America as the killing of Osama bin Laden. In fact, one can argue Soleimani’s death was more consequential as he was still the driving force behind both militia opposition and state-funded terrorists working on behalf of Iran to kill Americans. Both bin Laden and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the former leader of the Islamic State, were killed when their powers had already slipped away.
But appreciation of the death of Soleimani has proven to be much harder to find than it should be. Most Democrats and a handful of Republicans on Capitol Hill have expressed concerns over the killing of a man who was responsible for at least 603 American deaths and countless people across the Middle East. Why? For most Democrats, it’s all about politics. Unlike Republicans who universally supported the killing of bin Laden, Democrats view everything as partisan fodder. If President Trump makes any move at all, Democrats in DC will oppose it. As for the handful of Republicans opposed to it, their motivation is a leaning towards libertarian ideals of non-intervention. They want our military to never be engaged anywhere abroad at any time.
Senator Ted Cruz and 42 Republican cosponsors released a resolution praising the military and intelligence personnel involved in taking down Soleimani, as well as the President for ordering the strike.
Sen. Cruz Leads Resolution Praising Successful Mission to Eliminate Qasem Soleimani The resolution is modeled on a resolution unanimously supported by the U.S. Senate in 2011, after American forces killed Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden. “At a time when partisanship and political differences threaten to divide us, President Trump and his administration should be commended for bringing an end to Qasem Soleimani, a terrorist responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people across the Middle East, including at least 603 American service members,” Sen. Cruz said. “Just as we did in 2011 following the killing of Bin Laden, it is my hope my colleagues in the Senate will come together once again to honor all those involved in this successful mission to defend America’s national security interests and eliminate a terrorist mastermind.”
Anyone who kills Americans and is actively working to kill more is a threat who needs to be removed by any means necessary. This used to be a stance just about everyone could agree on, including Democrats and Libertarians, for one simple reason: To do otherwise is to risk the future of our nation by putting our men and women abroad at risk. Soleimani made it clear he intended to have as much American blood on his hands as possible. How does anyone in Washington DC object to his killing?
This resolution, if brought to the floor, will give every Senator an opportunity to answer a simple question: Are the really patriotic Americans or do they put political expediency over patriotism? Democrats will likely demonstrate they are the partisan hacks they’ve become in recent years. As for Republicans who have voiced concern over the President’s order, they should be able to put down their qualms for just a moment and commend those who helped take down arguably the greatest threat to American security and American lives abroad.
Commendation for those who helped take down Osama bin Laden was universal in the Senate even though he was impotent at the time. Qasem Soleimani was a threat until the moment his life ended. Appreciation of his death should be universal as well.


noqreport--2020-01-10--President Trump: Radical Democrats are ‘stone cold crazy’

Those of us who are old enough to remember what the Democratic Party used to be like often scratch our collective heads over what it is today .
Notions like socialism , open borders , single-payer healthcare , and supporting our enemies in Iran would have been anathema to the party less than two decades ago .
They ’ ve changed , and not for the better .
Many of today ’ s Democrats are so far to the left , their policies align more with China than the Democratic Party of the 1990s .
That ’ s why President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign rally in Toledo , Ohio .
He said , “ Radical Democrats have never been more extreme than they are right now .
They are stone cold crazy.
” The Democratic Party of old , the one the even private-citizen Trump often supported , is a distant memory .
Even the old school Democrats are embracing the radical fringe of the party .
Democratic voters of old are being left behind .
We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement .
If you are interested in learning more , we will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Those of us who are old enough to remember what the Democratic Party used to be like often scratch our collective heads over what it is today. Notions like socialism, open borders, single-payer healthcare, and supporting our enemies in Iran would have been anathema to the party less than two decades ago. They’ve changed, and not for the better.
Many of today’s Democrats are so far to the left, their policies align more with China than the Democratic Party of the 1990s. That’s why President Trump went after them hard at a campaign rally in Toledo, Ohio. He said, “Radical Democrats have never been more extreme than they are right now. They are stone cold crazy.”
The Democratic Party of old, the one the even private-citizen Trump often supported, is a distant memory. Even the old school Democrats are embracing the radical fringe of the party. Democratic voters of old are being left behind.