noqreport--2020-02-28--Maj Toure gives us all a lesson in ending tyranny

Black Guns Matter founder Maj Toure gave CPAC attendees a quick lesson how to make sure the messages of liberty and freedom are carried loudly and proudly .
His presentation was based on the book Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglass .
This just happens to be the Solutionary Book of the Month for March .
This is a program he is starting to get followers to read literature with conservative and liberty minded messages .
It is part of the first piece of advice he gave the audience , Educate yourself .
He asserted conservatism is a set @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the movement need to learn about the tools , ideas and speak about them passionately and proudly .
According to Toure , a silent majority is not effective .
If Frederick Douglass could trade food for the ability to read when both he and the person teaching him could have been severely punished , surely we can engage in educating ourselves to effectively fight a war of ideas .
Next , he told participants to ‘ Call Them Out ’ and not allow incorrect messages to permeate the culture .
Walmart decided @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pressure .
The activist told his followers to support local businesses .
We know that legal gun owners are some of the most responsible and safe citizens in the country .
Toure says Walmart ’ s decision was un-American and punished law abiding citizens .
He specifically pointed to Frederick Douglass naming his own masters and exposing how slaves were treated , even as children .
This was all while he was on the run and could have been returned at any time .
Third , he encouraged us to ‘ Work Nationally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a white man standing at the site of Nelson Mandela ’ s arrest in South Africa wearing a Black Guns Matter shirt .
Solutionarys , he stated can go wherever they want confident in their conservative principles .
Conservatives can also find allies around the world who want to join the movement for individual rights and liberty .
Douglass travelled around the world speaking of the evils of slavery .
Toure also touted his own podcast as an example of his fourth point , ‘ Create and Sell Your Own Media ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ station and violate the ever changing PC orthodoxy , a station could be pressured into firing you .
At $ 2 annually , Douglass ’ newspaper was a source of income that reached 4,000 subscribers and spread his message of freedom .
Douglass ’ first wife was Anna Murray-Douglass .
An abolitionist and member of the Underground Railroad , she accomplished much in her own right and helped Frederick escape before becoming his wife .
‘ Amplify the Voices of Women ’ Toure told the audience before asking them to ‘ Support Virginia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2nd Amendment rights .
Toure ’ s final emphasis was ‘ Recruit , Recruit , Recruit !
’ .
His own organization , which teaches conflict resolutions skills and gun rights in cities across the country , functions almost completely on grassroots and community support .
If you want to learn more about the work Maj is doing in our urban centers and to support his efforts please visit majtoure.com .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Black Guns Matter founder Maj Toure gave CPAC attendees a quick lesson how to make sure the messages of liberty and freedom are carried loudly and proudly. His presentation was based on the book Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglass. This just happens to be the Solutionary Book of the Month for March. This is a program he is starting to get followers to read literature with conservative and liberty minded messages.
It is part of the first piece of advice he gave the audience, Educate yourself. He asserted conservatism is a set of effective tools that work. Members of the movement need to learn about the tools, ideas and speak about them passionately and proudly. According to Toure, a silent majority is not effective. If Frederick Douglass could trade food for the ability to read when both he and the person teaching him could have been severely punished, surely we can engage in educating ourselves to effectively fight a war of ideas.
Next, he told participants to ‘Call Them Out’ and not allow incorrect messages to permeate the culture. Walmart decided to curtail gun sales caving to political pressure. The activist told his followers to support local businesses. We know that legal gun owners are some of the most responsible and safe citizens in the country. Toure says Walmart’s decision was un-American and punished law abiding citizens. He specifically pointed to Frederick Douglass naming his own masters and exposing how slaves were treated, even as children. This was all while he was on the run and could have been returned at any time.
Third, he encouraged us to ‘Work Nationally and Internationally’. Showing a picture of a white man standing at the site of Nelson Mandela’s arrest in South Africa wearing a Black Guns Matter shirt. Solutionarys, he stated can go wherever they want confident in their conservative principles. Conservatives can also find allies around the world who want to join the movement for individual rights and liberty. Douglass travelled around the world speaking of the evils of slavery.
Toure also touted his own podcast as an example of his fourth point, ‘Create and Sell Your Own Media’. If you work at a radio station and violate the ever changing PC orthodoxy, a station could be pressured into firing you. At $2 annually, Douglass’ newspaper was a source of income that reached 4,000 subscribers and spread his message of freedom.
Douglass’ first wife was Anna Murray-Douglass. An abolitionist and member of the Underground Railroad, she accomplished much in her own right and helped Frederick escape before becoming his wife. ‘Amplify the Voices of Women’ Toure told the audience before asking them to ‘Support Virginia’ in the fight to retain their 2nd Amendment rights.
Toure’s final emphasis was ‘Recruit, Recruit, Recruit!’. His own organization, which teaches conflict resolutions skills and gun rights in cities across the country, functions almost completely on grassroots and community support. If you want to learn more about the work Maj is doing in our urban centers and to support his efforts please visit majtoure.com.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-01--Black support for President Trump rising amid unpopular Democrat candidates

Before the first vote was cast in a primary or caucus this year , all of the major candidates who were persons of color had already dropped out of the race .
This made it impossible for Black or Latino voters to have a representative choice from their community when voting for a Democratic nominee , something they haven ’ t had since President Obama first ran a dozen years ago .
Compare this to the last Republican primary when two Latinos and an African-American were among the five final contestants for the GOP nomination of 2016 .
That same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were Caucasian .
The Democratic Party wanted to have GOP-life representation in 2020 until it became clear Cory Booker , Kamala Harris , and Julian Castro were not resonating .
Now , there are six Caucasians representing the party as major candidates still in the race heading into Super Tuesday .
The Democrats who remain are having a difficult time getting the Black vote to believe in them as well .
South Carolina was the first state with a strong Black voter base among Democrats to take part in a primary and former @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2/5th of the black vote .
Unfortunately for Biden , he is still going into Super Tuesday as a longshot in most of the states despite the momentum he is taking from South Carolina .
Meanwhile , Black unemployment is at historic lows while prosperity and wages are growing .
But that ’ s not the only reason President Trump ’ s popularity among African-Americans has risen to over 30 % after only getting 8 % of the Black vote in 2016 .
The White House continues to roll out programs that are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their voters , including housing and education programs that are proving to be more effective than anything seen in history .
Other than Biden , the other two so-called frontrunners—Bernie Sanders and Mike Bloomberg—are seeing flat numbers from African-Americans .
Sanders is failing to reach voters outside of his base with a positive message and Bloomberg ’ s history tends to not endear him to persons of color .
But outside of Texas , Biden is not polling well enough to be a serious contender on Super Tuesday , leaving Bloomberg ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spends as the wildcard going into the biggest nomination vote of the cycle .
Will his ads be appealing to persons of color ?
Deputy Assistant to the President Ja ’ Ron Smith spoke with OAN ’ s Chanel Rion to highlight many of the initiatives that are not only increasing President Trump ’ s popularity among black voters , but also helping to lift Black communities around the nation .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Before the first vote was cast in a primary or caucus this year, all of the major candidates who were persons of color had already dropped out of the race. This made it impossible for Black or Latino voters to have a representative choice from their community when voting for a Democratic nominee, something they haven’t had since President Obama first ran a dozen years ago.
Compare this to the last Republican primary when two Latinos and an African-American were among the five final contestants for the GOP nomination of 2016. That same year, all six major Democratic candidates were Caucasian. The Democratic Party wanted to have GOP-life representation in 2020 until it became clear Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, and Julian Castro were not resonating. Now, there are six Caucasians representing the party as major candidates still in the race heading into Super Tuesday.
The Democrats who remain are having a difficult time getting the Black vote to believe in them as well. South Carolina was the first state with a strong Black voter base among Democrats to take part in a primary and former Vice President Joe Biden excelled, gettin 2/5th of the black vote. Unfortunately for Biden, he is still going into Super Tuesday as a longshot in most of the states despite the momentum he is taking from South Carolina.
Meanwhile, Black unemployment is at historic lows while prosperity and wages are growing. But that’s not the only reason President Trump’s popularity among African-Americans has risen to over 30% after only getting 8% of the Black vote in 2016. The White House continues to roll out programs that are helping to lift many minority neighborhoods and their voters, including housing and education programs that are proving to be more effective than anything seen in history.
Other than Biden, the other two so-called frontrunners—Bernie Sanders and Mike Bloomberg—are seeing flat numbers from African-Americans. Sanders is failing to reach voters outside of his base with a positive message and Bloomberg’s history tends to not endear him to persons of color. But outside of Texas, Biden is not polling well enough to be a serious contender on Super Tuesday, leaving Bloomberg’s hundreds of millions of dollars in ad spends as the wildcard going into the biggest nomination vote of the cycle. Will his ads be appealing to persons of color?
Deputy Assistant to the President Ja’Ron Smith spoke with OAN’s Chanel Rion to highlight many of the initiatives that are not only increasing President Trump’s popularity among black voters, but also helping to lift Black communities around the nation.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-01--Analysis: Bernie Sanders and President Trump have similar speech patterns

When we think of Senator Bernie Sanders and President Trump , it ’ s hard to find similarities between them .
Ideologically they ’ re on opposite ends of the spectrum .
The way they present their messages are very different… or are they ?
Few would argue against these being the two American politicians with the most rabid base supporters .
Both tend to be extreme in their adoration for their chosen leaders which is why nobody draws a crowd to rallies like them .
In fact , nobody comes close .
As YouTube video essayist NerdWriter noted , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a speaking perspective may be erroneous .
The two use very similar styles with different nuances .
A Sanders-Trump general election race would be extremely interesting .
As supporters of President Trump , we welcome the challenge .
The Democratic Socialist may be popular , but he still doesn ’ t hold a candle to the respect the President gets from his base .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
When we think of Senator Bernie Sanders and President Trump, it’s hard to find similarities between them. Ideologically they’re on opposite ends of the spectrum. The way they present their messages are very different… or are they?
Few would argue against these being the two American politicians with the most rabid base supporters. Both tend to be extreme in their adoration for their chosen leaders which is why nobody draws a crowd to rallies like them. In fact, nobody comes close. As YouTube video essayist NerdWriter noted, the perceived differences between the candidates from a speaking perspective may be erroneous. The two use very similar styles with different nuances.
A Sanders-Trump general election race would be extremely interesting. As supporters of President Trump, we welcome the challenge. The Democratic Socialist may be popular, but he still doesn’t hold a candle to the respect the President gets from his base.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-01--Joe Biden’s big win in South Carolina is a big problem for Mike Bloomberg

Billionaire Mike Bloomberg envisioned a two-man race going into Super Tuesday .
He was banking on it , literally , which is why he decided to come in later rather than put himself in the firing line during the February primary/caucus season .
He figured nobody would emerge as the frontrunner in the moderate lane , leaving him with an unofficial mandate to take on Senator Bernie Sanders mano-a-mano starting in March .
Former Vice President Joe Biden blew up those plans with an unexpectedly lopsided victory in South Carolina just three days before Super Tuesday .
Biden was favored @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had projected him to get nearly 50 % of the vote .
Heck , I had him at around 30 % with Sanders and billionaire Tom Steyer at around 20 % each .
But Biden blew out the competition with Sanders only getting a handful of delegates and Steyer ending his campaign .
It ’ s the worst-case-scenario for Bloomberg ; as I noted yesterday , Bloomberg needed Sanders to either win or come in a very close second .
With 90 % of the votes counted , it isn ’ t close @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by nearly 30-points .
If Biden could have stalled out in South Carolina , the path for Bloomberg to take the reins in the moderate lane would have been clear .
Super Tuesday would likely have swung in his direction after almost exclusively campaigning in the 14 states for the past two months and sinking hundreds of millions of dollars into big market television ads .
By winning huge , Biden ’ s campaign is officially back .
The anointing of Bloomberg as the only possible Bernie-killer is postponed .
It may even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over-perform on Super Tuesday .
Currently , Sanders has the lead in most states , including a double-digit lead in California .
To be competitive , Bloomberg needed Biden to be so embarrassed by the results of South Carolina that he bowed out .
The opposite happened .
Besides Steyer , the other candidates are not expected to drop out before Super Tuesday .
It ’ s only three days , after all .
Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar each have their homes states voting on Tuesday , meaning if they do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign ends in friendly territory .
Mayor Pete Buttigieg is still in third-place in the delegate race and had a decent fourth-place finish in South Carolina ; 8 % in a state with a mostly Black Democratic electorate is actually decent news for the young , gay candidate .
This victory did more than keep Biden in the race and give him momentum ahead of the most important day of the year for the nomination .
It also signaled to those quietly rooting for him that they could go public with their support @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Governor and DNC Chair Terry McAuliffe , who announced his endorsement of Biden just after the results showed the former VP had won big .
Virginia ’ s primary is on Super Tuesday , and as South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn demonstrated , these types of endorsements help greatly to alert state voters about who to trust .
The Bloomberg campaign is putting on a happy face for the public , but privately they ’ re stewing .
His poor debate performances knocked him out of favor with the Democratic Establishment , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ put their thumbs on the South Carolina scale to give Biden the big win he needed .
South Carolina strapped the defibrillators to the Biden campaign ’ s chest and surged it back to life .
In doing so , they may have stuck a dagger in the Bloomberg campaign ’ s back .
Super Tuesday could eliminate all but two candidates , Sanders and… who ?
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Billionaire Mike Bloomberg envisioned a two-man race going into Super Tuesday. He was banking on it, literally, which is why he decided to come in later rather than put himself in the firing line during the February primary/caucus season. He figured nobody would emerge as the frontrunner in the moderate lane, leaving him with an unofficial mandate to take on Senator Bernie Sanders mano-a-mano starting in March.
Former Vice President Joe Biden blew up those plans with an unexpectedly lopsided victory in South Carolina just three days before Super Tuesday.
Sleepy Joe Biden’s victory in the South Carolina Democrat Primary should be the end of Mini Mike Bloomberg’s Joke of a campaign. After the worst debate performance in the history of presidential debates, Mini Mike now has Biden split up his very few voters, taking many away! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 1, 2020
Biden was favored going into the race, but nobody had projected him to get nearly 50% of the vote. Heck, I had him at around 30% with Sanders and billionaire Tom Steyer at around 20% each. But Biden blew out the competition with Sanders only getting a handful of delegates and Steyer ending his campaign.
It’s the worst-case-scenario for Bloomberg; as I noted yesterday, Bloomberg needed Sanders to either win or come in a very close second. With 90% of the votes counted, it isn’t close at all with Biden beating 2nd-place Sanders by nearly 30-points. If Biden could have stalled out in South Carolina, the path for Bloomberg to take the reins in the moderate lane would have been clear. Super Tuesday would likely have swung in his direction after almost exclusively campaigning in the 14 states for the past two months and sinking hundreds of millions of dollars into big market television ads.
By winning huge, Biden’s campaign is officially back. The anointing of Bloomberg as the only possible Bernie-killer is postponed. It may even be derailed if he doesn’t over-perform on Super Tuesday. Currently, Sanders has the lead in most states, including a double-digit lead in California. To be competitive, Bloomberg needed Biden to be so embarrassed by the results of South Carolina that he bowed out. The opposite happened.
Besides Steyer, the other candidates are not expected to drop out before Super Tuesday. It’s only three days, after all. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar each have their homes states voting on Tuesday, meaning if they do not do well they can announce their campaign ends in friendly territory. Mayor Pete Buttigieg is still in third-place in the delegate race and had a decent fourth-place finish in South Carolina; 8% in a state with a mostly Black Democratic electorate is actually decent news for the young, gay candidate.
This victory did more than keep Biden in the race and give him momentum ahead of the most important day of the year for the nomination. It also signaled to those quietly rooting for him that they could go public with their support. The most notable was former Virginia Governor and DNC Chair Terry McAuliffe, who announced his endorsement of Biden just after the results showed the former VP had won big. Virginia’s primary is on Super Tuesday, and as South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn demonstrated, these types of endorsements help greatly to alert state voters about who to trust.
The Bloomberg campaign is putting on a happy face for the public, but privately they’re stewing. His poor debate performances knocked him out of favor with the Democratic Establishment, which has led to speculation that the DNC put their thumbs on the South Carolina scale to give Biden the big win he needed.
South Carolina strapped the defibrillators to the Biden campaign’s chest and surged it back to life. In doing so, they may have stuck a dagger in the Bloomberg campaign’s back. Super Tuesday could eliminate all but two candidates, Sanders and… who?
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!


noqreport--2020-03-01--A 40-year tradition, gone: California’s AB5 kills off Lake Tahoe Music Festival

After over 40-years of delivering classical music to the people of California and beyond , the Lake Tahoe Music Festival will be ending its run with a two-night performance in August .
They attribute California ’ s AB-5 , the “ gig economy killer ” promoted by Big Labor and radical progressive leftists among California Democrats .
The new law , which was passed under the subterfuge of “ protecting ” employees , has been wreaking havoc across the state ’ s millions of gig workers .
As with other leftist ideas like raising the minimum wage to $ 15 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American businesses , AB-5 has delivered many “ unintended ” consequences .
These consequences were , of course , well-known and deliberate , but the Democratic Party ’ s allegiance to labor bosses means they have to sneak in their moves under the cover of “ protecting ” employees .
The law places restrictions on individuals ’ ability to earn a living by steering them towards jobs that are controlled by Big Labor .
It was sold as a way to empower gig workers like Uber and Lyft drivers , but the results @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Freelance writers , for example , are being forced to consider leaving the state or changing professions as those who previously employed them were forced to cut ties with anyone in the radical progressive state .
According to the Lake Tahoe Music Festival ’ s website : New CA employment law AB-5 requirements add to the challenge of meeting our financial goals and create the final stressor on our small non-profit organization .
For several years we have experienced the same slowly eroding philanthropic support of cultural life faced by other small @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now join many who also face increased uncertainty regarding employment costs and infrastructure needs associated with AB-5 .
So we will bring our festival to a close with pride in our long-time contribution to community life in North Tahoe and Truckee .
A free market economy with limited regulations on business truly empowers workers , especially in a robust economy .
There are more jobs than people to fill them in America , giving the power of negotiating a better deal back in the hands of individual workers .
But laws like AB-5 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while also damaging businesses , a feat that can only be pulled off by powerful organizations like those who bow to Big Labor .
The damage from AB-5 continues to accumulate .
They did a number on millions of workers and businesses who seek to operate in the state .
Big Labor is ecstatic by the results , which makes one wonder how they can claim to be on the workers ’ side .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
After over 40-years of delivering classical music to the people of California and beyond, the Lake Tahoe Music Festival will be ending its run with a two-night performance in August. They attribute California’s AB-5, the “gig economy killer” promoted by Big Labor and radical progressive leftists among California Democrats.
The new law, which was passed under the subterfuge of “protecting” employees, has been wreaking havoc across the state’s millions of gig workers. As with other leftist ideas like raising the minimum wage to $15 or higher and forcing unnecessary regulations on American businesses, AB-5 has delivered many “unintended” consequences. These consequences were, of course, well-known and deliberate, but the Democratic Party’s allegiance to labor bosses means they have to sneak in their moves under the cover of “protecting” employees.
After 40 yrs, CA's Lake Tahoe Music Festival ends b/c of costs & paperwork from new law regulating contract workers like musicians, who voted for the idiotic leftists who passed law putting musicians out of work. But govt is trying to HELP you!
https://t.co/vUcWaob8pY — Gov. Mike Huckabee (@GovMikeHuckabee) March 1, 2020
The law places restrictions on individuals’ ability to earn a living by steering them towards jobs that are controlled by Big Labor. It was sold as a way to empower gig workers like Uber and Lyft drivers, but the results thus far have been catastrophic for many. Freelance writers, for example, are being forced to consider leaving the state or changing professions as those who previously employed them were forced to cut ties with anyone in the radical progressive state.
According to the Lake Tahoe Music Festival’s website:
New CA employment law AB-5 requirements add to the challenge of meeting our financial goals and create the final stressor on our small non-profit organization. For several years we have experienced the same slowly eroding philanthropic support of cultural life faced by other small arts organizations in our state. We now join many who also face increased uncertainty regarding employment costs and infrastructure needs associated with AB-5. So we will bring our festival to a close with pride in our long-time contribution to community life in North Tahoe and Truckee.
A free market economy with limited regulations on business truly empowers workers, especially in a robust economy. There are more jobs than people to fill them in America, giving the power of negotiating a better deal back in the hands of individual workers. But laws like AB-5 seek to limit the freedoms of workers while also damaging businesses, a feat that can only be pulled off by powerful organizations like those who bow to Big Labor.
The damage from AB-5 continues to accumulate. They did a number on millions of workers and businesses who seek to operate in the state. Big Labor is ecstatic by the results, which makes one wonder how they can claim to be on the workers’ side.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-01--‘Unite America’ PAC: Everything that’s wrong with the covert socialist left

For all of his faults and ideology based on falsehoods , at least Bernie Sanders is honest about who he is .
Breadline Bernie proudly admits that he ’ s a socialist .
Those of you who claim to be ‘ democratic ’ socialists will have to prove there is a difference before we will accept your name game .
Contrast that with presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg and others who claim to be ‘ moderates ’ or ‘ centrists ’ who hide their sinister ways .
That still want the same items of the left ’ s socialist national agenda @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Unite America a self described “ Hybrid ” PAC Consider the following problems they list on their website : While the rising budget deficit is something of a concern for those of us trying to conserve liberty , that concern is contrasted with the line about ‘ the growing gap between rich and poor ’ being a decidedly leftist issue , along with the climate ‘ crisis ’ and to a certain extent concerns over health care .
Then consider the leadership claiming to be ‘ centrist ’ while primarily coming from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some being veterans of similar organization ‘ NoLabels ’ .
Then there is the fact their introductory video starred committed leftist Michael Douglas .
This clearly a leftist group trying to pose as being ‘ non-partisan ’ as does the ‘ NoLabels ’ organisation .
Breaking politics down to its constituent components There are really just two sides in the political realm : Individualism and collectivism .
Those of us on the political right are on the individualist , pro-liberty side of the political spectrum : Anarchist , Libertarians , Conservatives , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Those on the political left are on the collectivist , societal control side of the political spectrum : leftists , fascists , socialists and totalitarians favor ‘ collective ‘ rights and control .
A quote from Ayn Rand on socialism perfectly frames the difference : Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake , that his life and his work do not belong to him , but belong to society , that the only justification of his existence is his service to society , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal , collective good .
The essential characteristic of socialism is the denial of individual property rights ; under socialism , the right to property ( which is the right of use and disposal ) is vested in “ society as a whole , ” i.e.
, in the collective , with production and distribution controlled by the state , i.e.
, by the government .
Socialism may be established by force , as in the Union of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Nazi ( National Socialist ) Germany .
The degree of socialization may be total , as in Russia—or partial , as in England .
Theoretically , the differences are superficial ; practically , they are only a matter of time .
The basic principle , in all cases , is the same .
The same old story : The socialist left always tries to muddy the political water The far-left certainly can ’ t campaign on this basis .
They would never win .
They could reject their collectivist control principles , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leftists .
They would become Anarchist , Libertarians , Conservatives , and true liberals .
Their only other choice is to confuse the issue with false labels , propaganda and organizations such as ‘ NoLabels ’ or ‘ Unite America ’ .
They exploit certain labels that imply support of liberty or progress .
They have propaganda efforts such as the ‘ political compass ’ that seeks to hide the basic authoritarian nature of the left .
The bottom line : Political positions have to be based on principles , not pablum The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because they are authoritarian in nature .
We on the political right can be open and honest because we favor liberty over control .
The political left has to hide who they are because they favor control over liberty .
This is easy to see in the policies they foment .
Supposedly ‘ non-partisan ’ groups such as ‘ NoLabels ’ or ‘ Unite America ’ are more of a threat than honest leftists .
The latter tend to either gloss over the horrid nature of their base ideology or have a superficial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ likely knows what they are doing and are concealing the truth because that is the only way they can attain power .
The authoritarian socialist left is on its last legs .
The ascendancy of Bernie Sanders means we will finally have a conversation about the horrid nature of the collectivist ideologies .
They will no longer be able to hide behind the Scandinavian socialism mythology or any of the others falsehoods they promulgate .
They will be out in the open on the battlefield of ideas .
The vast superiority of liberty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
For all of his faults and ideology based on falsehoods, at least Bernie Sanders is honest about who he is. Breadline Bernie proudly admits that he’s a socialist. Those of you who claim to be ‘democratic’ socialists will have to prove there is a difference before we will accept your name game.
Contrast that with presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg and others who claim to be ‘moderates’ or ‘centrists’ who hide their sinister ways. That still want the same items of the left’s socialist national agenda.
Enter the supposedly ‘non-partisan’ Unite America a self described “Hybrid” PAC
Consider the following problems they list on their website:
Skyrocketing health care costs. The growing gap between rich and poor. Rising budget deficits. A climate in crisis.
While the rising budget deficit is something of a concern for those of us trying to conserve liberty, that concern is contrasted with the line about ‘the growing gap between rich and poor’ being a decidedly leftist issue, along with the climate ‘crisis’ and to a certain extent concerns over health care.
Then consider the leadership claiming to be ‘centrist’ while primarily coming from the left side of the political spectrum with some being veterans of similar organization ‘NoLabels’. Then there is the fact their introductory video starred committed leftist Michael Douglas. This clearly a leftist group trying to pose as being ‘non-partisan’ as does the ‘NoLabels’ organisation.
Breaking politics down to its constituent components
There are really just two sides in the political realm: Individualism and collectivism. Those of us on the political right are on the individualist, pro-liberty side of the political spectrum: Anarchist, Libertarians, Conservatives, and true liberals favor individual rights and freedoms.
Those on the political left are on the collectivist, societal control side of the political spectrum: leftists, fascists, socialists and totalitarians favor ‘collective‘ rights and control.
A quote from Ayn Rand on socialism perfectly frames the difference:
Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good. The essential characteristic of socialism is the denial of individual property rights; under socialism, the right to property (which is the right of use and disposal) is vested in “society as a whole,” i.e., in the collective, with production and distribution controlled by the state, i.e., by the government. Socialism may be established by force, as in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics—or by vote, as in Nazi (National Socialist) Germany. The degree of socialization may be total, as in Russia—or partial, as in England. Theoretically, the differences are superficial; practically, they are only a matter of time. The basic principle, in all cases, is the same.
[Emphasis added]
The same old story: The socialist left always tries to muddy the political water
The far-left certainly can’t campaign on this basis. They would never win. They could reject their collectivist control principles, but then they would cease to be leftists. They would become Anarchist, Libertarians, Conservatives, and true liberals.
Dr. Joseph Mercola said, “Synthetic meat is the epitome of ultraprocessed food, and it seems naïve to think it won’t have health effects similar to other ultraprocessed junk foods.” For All-American REAL beef raised in pastures, sous vide, then freeze-dried for long-term storage, visit Whole Cows and use promo code “no junk” at checkout.
Their only other choice is to confuse the issue with false labels, propaganda and organizations such as ‘NoLabels’ or ‘Unite America’. They exploit certain labels that imply support of liberty or progress. They have propaganda efforts such as the ‘political compass’ that seeks to hide the basic authoritarian nature of the left.
“Political tags – such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth – are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.” Robert A. Heinlein
[Emphasis added]
The bottom line: Political positions have to be based on principles, not pablum
The left has to obscure their base principles because they are authoritarian in nature. We on the political right can be open and honest because we favor liberty over control. The political left has to hide who they are because they favor control over liberty. This is easy to see in the policies they foment.
Supposedly ‘non-partisan’ groups such as ‘NoLabels’ or ‘Unite America’ are more of a threat than honest leftists. The latter tend to either gloss over the horrid nature of their base ideology or have a superficial understanding of it. The former most likely knows what they are doing and are concealing the truth because that is the only way they can attain power.
The authoritarian socialist left is on its last legs. The ascendancy of Bernie Sanders means we will finally have a conversation about the horrid nature of the collectivist ideologies. They will no longer be able to hide behind the Scandinavian socialism mythology or any of the others falsehoods they promulgate. They will be out in the open on the battlefield of ideas. The vast superiority of liberty will see the end of collectivism.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-29--Why I take the sabbath off even though I’m not a 7th Day Adventist or Hebrew Roots guy

I ’ m just a Bible-believing Christian .
I don ’ t adhere to any particular denomination .
I don ’ t go to a traditional church .
My wife and I do Bible study , listen to a wide variety of sermons and Bible teachers , and we keep the sabbath .
But we ’ re not Seventh Day Adventists nor part of the Hebrew Roots movement .
Both have some good teachings .
Both have some that we consider to be heretical .
We ’ re just Christians , and as such we believe in the validity of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Part of this belief centers on a truth that the Ten Commandments are eternal , including the commandment regarding the sabbath day .
From the Book of Exodus : 8 Remember the sabbath day , to keep it holy .
9 Six days shalt thou labour , and do all thy work : 10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God : in it thou shalt not do any work , thou , nor thy son , nor thy daughter , thy manservant , nor thy maidservant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stranger that is within thy gates : 11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth , the sea , and all that in them is , and rested the seventh day : wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day , and hallowed it .
This is clear .
It is absolutely unambiguous .
There is no room for interpretation , no need for extensive exegesis .
Nevertheless , the modern day Christian church of nearly all denominations do not teach keeping the sabbath and hold their day of worship on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future , I ’ ll write an article explaining why this is the case—the historical truth will shock many Christians—and why we , as believers that Jesus Christ is our Lord , Savior , and only Salvation , should all keep the sabbath as commanded by God .
It isn ’ t because we must keep the law to earn salvation , which only comes through faith , but as James wrote , our works exemplify our faith .
For now , I ’ ll encourage readers to do some research on your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the sabbath away first , but do so prayerfully and with discernment in your heart .
The verses they quote as “ proof ” the sabbath was changed , abolished , moved , or otherwise superseded as a commandment should strike you as conspicuously vague .
They all require us to suspend disbelief in the works of Satan to change times and laws .
They demand that we assume a crystal clear edict given through Moses to the world has been vanquished through wordplay and casual examples by Jesus and the apostles .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ God would have made that clear .
Our Savior is Lord of the Sabbath .
To say it ’ s now vanquished as a result of His death and resurrection is to say his lordship in this regard is no longer required .
Nothing can be further from the truth .
Search scripture and see what it says about sabbath .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
I’m just a Bible-believing Christian. I don’t adhere to any particular denomination. I don’t go to a traditional church. My wife and I do Bible study, listen to a wide variety of sermons and Bible teachers, and we keep the sabbath. But we’re not Seventh Day Adventists nor part of the Hebrew Roots movement. Both have some good teachings. Both have some that we consider to be heretical.
We’re just Christians, and as such we believe in the validity of the whole Bible from Genesis to Revelation. Part of this belief centers on a truth that the Ten Commandments are eternal, including the commandment regarding the sabbath day. From the Book of Exodus:
8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: 10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: 11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
This is clear. It is absolutely unambiguous. There is no room for interpretation, no need for extensive exegesis. Nevertheless, the modern day Christian church of nearly all denominations do not teach keeping the sabbath and hold their day of worship on Sunday.
At some point in the future, I’ll write an article explaining why this is the case—the historical truth will shock many Christians—and why we, as believers that Jesus Christ is our Lord, Savior, and only Salvation, should all keep the sabbath as commanded by God. It isn’t because we must keep the law to earn salvation, which only comes through faith, but as James wrote, our works exemplify our faith.
James 2:18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
For now, I’ll encourage readers to do some research on your own. Listen to those who explain the sabbath away first, but do so prayerfully and with discernment in your heart. The verses they quote as “proof” the sabbath was changed, abolished, moved, or otherwise superseded as a commandment should strike you as conspicuously vague. They all require us to suspend disbelief in the works of Satan to change times and laws. They demand that we assume a crystal clear edict given through Moses to the world has been vanquished through wordplay and casual examples by Jesus and the apostles. If the sabbath day was abolished, God would have made that clear.
Our Savior is Lord of the Sabbath. To say it’s now vanquished as a result of His death and resurrection is to say his lordship in this regard is no longer required. Nothing can be further from the truth. Search scripture and see what it says about sabbath.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-01--Pete Buttigieg dropping out smells a lot like quid pro quo

Somebody made a deal .
Was it the DNC ?
Mike Bloomberg ?
Perhaps even Joe Biden ?
Pete Buttigieg , the young Mayor of South Bend , Indiana , who won the Iowa Caucus and performed better than expected in the New Hampshire primary and Nevada caucus ( and arguably the South Carolina primary where he came in fourth ) , has inexplicably dropped out of the race two days before Super Tuesday .
Like I said , somebody made a deal .
While his chances of winning the nomination were low at this stage , leaving ahead of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ debate performance and over-performing in all four contests to date , it appears to be nothing short of some sort of exchange that pushed him to the decision .
Perhaps the DNC told him they would back his run in 2024 if the Democrats lose or 2028 if they win .
Maybe Bloomberg and/or Biden offered him a nice cabinet position ; it ’ s almost certain the VP tap is going to a woman regardless of who gets the nomination .
Whatever happened , it ’ s highly unlikely Buttigieg would have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He had absolutely nothing to lose and everything to gain by waiting until after Super Tuesday .
Unlike Cory Booker , Julian Castro , and others who dropped out relatively early , Buttigieg had plenty of cash on hand .
While it ’ s true he will now be able to apply that money to future campaigns , it still seems like a waste considering his age .
As the youngest candidate with arguably the brightest future going , there will be plenty of time to raise campaign funds for his next endeavors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reasons for him dropping out and turn to the more conspiratorial notions that someone made him a deal he couldn ’ t refuse .
If I was forced to guess , I ’ d say it was a combination of the DNC , Bloomberg , and Biden .
By combination , I ’ m not suggesting they all spoke to him independently or as a group , but likely came to him with a group of promises depending on the various scenarios .
If one of the two “ moderates ” gets the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a cabinet position .
Chief of Staff seems like a natural fit for a man who prides himself as one who unites people .
In case Biden or Bloomberg lose , Buttigieg was likely promised top billing going into the 2024 election .
Keep in mind , whatever offer was made , it will have been big .
The stakes are far too high in the eyes of Establishment Democrats as they desperately oppose Sanders getting the nomination .
This move opens the doors wide open for Biden or Bloomberg ; it seemed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s share of the delegates on Tuesday as the crowded moderate lane made it possible other candidates would fail to reach the 15 % threshold for delegates .
By eliminating the # 3 guy in that lane , his support will be split between Biden and Bloomberg with some going to Amy Klobuchar .
In other words , Buttigieg dropping out gives the moderates a chance .
As I noted before , California in particular is a state in which Sanders is not only going to win , but had a chance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s delegates .
Everyone else was floating at or below the 15 % threshold in recent polls .
Buttigieg ’ s exit changes everything .
Buttigieg ’ s exit is great news for the floundering Bloomberg and resurgent Biden .
Meanwhile , every Sanders supporter should be concerned that this is the Democratic Establishment ’ s power play to stop their guy .
It very well might work .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Somebody made a deal. Was it the DNC? Mike Bloomberg? Perhaps even Joe Biden? Pete Buttigieg, the young Mayor of South Bend, Indiana, who won the Iowa Caucus and performed better than expected in the New Hampshire primary and Nevada caucus (and arguably the South Carolina primary where he came in fourth), has inexplicably dropped out of the race two days before Super Tuesday.
Like I said, somebody made a deal.
Timing of the Buttigieg drop out is more than a little unusual. Maybe he secured some sort of deal … a “quid pro quo,” we might say. — Josh Hammer (@josh_hammer) March 1, 2020
While his chances of winning the nomination were low at this stage, leaving ahead of Super Tuesday, especially following a strong debate performance and over-performing in all four contests to date, it appears to be nothing short of some sort of exchange that pushed him to the decision. Perhaps the DNC told him they would back his run in 2024 if the Democrats lose or 2028 if they win. Maybe Bloomberg and/or Biden offered him a nice cabinet position; it’s almost certain the VP tap is going to a woman regardless of who gets the nomination. Whatever happened, it’s highly unlikely Buttigieg would have dropped out willingly with no assurances. He had absolutely nothing to lose and everything to gain by waiting until after Super Tuesday.
Unlike Cory Booker, Julian Castro, and others who dropped out relatively early, Buttigieg had plenty of cash on hand. While it’s true he will now be able to apply that money to future campaigns, it still seems like a waste considering his age. As the youngest candidate with arguably the brightest future going, there will be plenty of time to raise campaign funds for his next endeavors. We can therefore exclude all standard reasons for him dropping out and turn to the more conspiratorial notions that someone made him a deal he couldn’t refuse.
If I was forced to guess, I’d say it was a combination of the DNC, Bloomberg, and Biden. By combination, I’m not suggesting they all spoke to him independently or as a group, but likely came to him with a group of promises depending on the various scenarios. If one of the two “moderates” gets the nomination and wins, Buttigieg would get a cabinet position. Chief of Staff seems like a natural fit for a man who prides himself as one who unites people. In case Biden or Bloomberg lose, Buttigieg was likely promised top billing going into the 2024 election.
Keep in mind, whatever offer was made, it will have been big. The stakes are far too high in the eyes of Establishment Democrats as they desperately oppose Sanders getting the nomination. This move opens the doors wide open for Biden or Bloomberg; it seemed very likely Sanders would get the lion’s share of the delegates on Tuesday as the crowded moderate lane made it possible other candidates would fail to reach the 15% threshold for delegates. By eliminating the #3 guy in that lane, his support will be split between Biden and Bloomberg with some going to Amy Klobuchar.
In other words, Buttigieg dropping out gives the moderates a chance. As I noted before, California in particular is a state in which Sanders is not only going to win, but had a chance of taking nearly all of the state’s delegates. Everyone else was floating at or below the 15% threshold in recent polls. Buttigieg’s exit changes everything.
Buttigieg’s exit is great news for the floundering Bloomberg and resurgent Biden. Meanwhile, every Sanders supporter should be concerned that this is the Democratic Establishment’s power play to stop their guy. It very well might work.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-01--Christianity Today’s vegan propaganda

Christianity Today’s vegan propaganda

It ’ s not much of a secret that Christianity Today is Christian in name only .
This became quite clear after they came out of the closet with Mark Galli ’ s unethical and unbiblical argument weighing into politics in December .
But the influence of the magazine is not waned completely .
And this season of lent they published vegan propaganda under the guise of good stewardship towards creation .
In an article titled Going Vegan for Lent Can Orient Us to Christ ’ s Calling , there is no shortage of bad history used to further bad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ begins by establishing a precedent of veganism and Christianity , specifically during lent .
This premise that fasting is about stewardship and healthy attitudes towards food is patently false .
The goal of fasting is to rely on God , alone , “ A man does not live on bread alone.
” It has nothing to do with caring for creation or one ’ s own health .
The author , Elyse Durham , then goes on to say that the Bible promotes veganism Breaking down the examples of “ veganism ” in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ case .
John the Baptist ate locus , an animal , therefore he was not remotely vegetarian .
I would further maintain that the consumption of animal , as opposed to animal biproducts , is meat .
I also say this as a staunch supporter of eating alternative meats , which includes insects .
In Daniel ’ s case he abstained from delicious foods , or anything that would make eating enjoyable .
So I suppose this supports veganism but in no capacity is this done for Daniel ’ s health , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last sentence then presupposes a biblical basis for lent which doesn ’ t really exist .
Lent is a man-made tradition , unfounded in Scripture ( or else she would have cited it . )
The tradition of veganism during lent is not a good one .
During the Middle Ages , the Catholic Church declared it a sin to eat butter during lent .
Bluntly put , this is legalism .
However there are factors making this particularly worse .
People back then had more austere diets to begin with , so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a way to starve populations .
On top of that the standards do not make sense , such as Catholics eating fish on Fridays .
This also became a means to sell indulgences .
Jim Mica of the Living Lutheran notes that butter fueled the Reformation .
He says : Butter doesn ’ t get talked about much when we review Reformation history today , but Luther did bring it up in his 1520 address “ To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation.
” The bulk of the essay deals with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scripture and the “ priesthood of all believers ” —but Luther brought up butter at least a half dozen times .
When Luther—as translated by C.M .
Jacobs—expounded on unjust church taxes , he went into full rhetorical mode : “ For at Rome they themselves laugh at the fasts , making us foreigners eat the oil with which they would not grease their shoes , and afterwards selling us liberty to eat butter and all sorts of other things … thinking it is a greater sin to eat butter is a greater @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , or even to live unchastely.
” It would later be concluded that the more dairy rich nations in Europe would break from the Catholic Church .
The tradition of veganism is not a proud one as it was oil on the corruption of the Catholic Church to the point of Reformation in 1517 .
Christianity Today , after championing a horrid tradition , moves to make a moral argument for veganism .
First the article states that we should have compassion towards animals , implying that eating them is against creation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ theological argument about creation , that likely assumes that there was no animal death prior to the fall , the moral argument rails against factory farming .
I would disagree as this is a stretch , while not all meat farming is ethical , not all meat comes from such .
At what point is any of this bad ?
The expansion of meat in our diets has caused far fewer people to starve .
If you want to feed the hungry , veganism is the opposite of how you do that .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a good thing , a bounty to be thankful to God for .
Again , this is a good thing .
Furthermore the plethora of meat alternatives are worse for you than meat itself .
The differences between the Impossible Whopper and the real deal are rather nominal on the surface , however a deeper understanding of nutritional science favors the real meats in all of the above cases .
Not all proteins are equal .
Animal based protein is nutritionally superior to plant based proteins , especially soy which is bad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amino acids ( the building block of what a protein is ) in comparison to animal proteins .
In addition to a less complete amino acid portfolio these fake meats contain numerous suspect chemicals .
For instance , Methylcellulose is a filler that has no health benefits and potential adverse effects .
Christianity Today continues its moral argument by denouncing consumerism , in a non sequitur .
Then they promote climate hysteria , claiming that livestock contribute to climate change .
It ’ s important to note , which they do not , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Before closing the author cites Karen Swallow Prior , the one who said it ’ s ‘ unChristlike ” to refer to people who get and provide abortions as murderers and would go on to endorse the homosexual Revoice Conference , as a “ Christian writer and thinker ” further signaling the author ’ s lack of a Christian worldview .
The article ends with conflating veganism and fasting .
When you have a Christian worldview , you do not rely on the standards that the world creates to make moral arguments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is no moral , let alone Christian , case to make for veganism , nor is there any reason to conflate abstaining from certain meats and animal products with fasting .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
It’s not much of a secret that Christianity Today is Christian in name only. This became quite clear after they came out of the closet with Mark Galli’s unethical and unbiblical argument weighing into politics in December. But the influence of the magazine is not waned completely. And this season of lent they published vegan propaganda under the guise of good stewardship towards creation. In an article titled Going Vegan for Lent Can Orient Us to Christ’s Calling, there is no shortage of bad history used to further bad science and worse theology.
The article begins by establishing a precedent of veganism and Christianity, specifically during lent.
Yet thousands of years before veganism became popular, the Bible and Christian tradition included fasting as a way of maintaining healthy attitudes toward food and stewarding the earth responsibly.
This premise that fasting is about stewardship and healthy attitudes towards food is patently false. The goal of fasting is to rely on God, alone, “A man does not live on bread alone.” It has nothing to do with caring for creation or one’s own health. The author, Elyse Durham, then goes on to say that the Bible promotes veganism
In Scripture, fasting is a means of repentance and of crying out for God’s attention and help. But fasting doesn’t necessarily require total abstention from food: it can also mean the simple avoidance of meat and dairy, as in the case of Daniel (Dan. 10:3). John the Baptist (Matt. 3:1–4), as a consumer of locusts and honey, was not strictly a vegan, but through his ascetic diet and lifestyle often causes him to be considered the father of monastic fasting traditions. These Scriptural examples set the precedent for Christian traditions of abstaining from animal products, particularly during Lent.
Breaking down the examples of “veganism” in Scripture does not support Durham’s case. John the Baptist ate locus, an animal, therefore he was not remotely vegetarian. I would further maintain that the consumption of animal, as opposed to animal biproducts, is meat. I also say this as a staunch supporter of eating alternative meats, which includes insects. In Daniel’s case he abstained from delicious foods, or anything that would make eating enjoyable. So I suppose this supports veganism but in no capacity is this done for Daniel’s health, but rather a sense of terror. The last sentence then presupposes a biblical basis for lent which doesn’t really exist. Lent is a man-made tradition, unfounded in Scripture (or else she would have cited it.)
The tradition of veganism during lent is not a good one. During the Middle Ages, the Catholic Church declared it a sin to eat butter during lent. Bluntly put, this is legalism. However there are factors making this particularly worse. People back then had more austere diets to begin with, so removing fat from their diets was effectively a way to starve populations. On top of that the standards do not make sense, such as Catholics eating fish on Fridays. This also became a means to sell indulgences. Jim Mica of the Living Lutheran notes that butter fueled the Reformation. He says:
Butter doesn’t get talked about much when we review Reformation history today, but Luther did bring it up in his 1520 address “To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation.” The bulk of the essay deals with the church and politics, the interpretation of Scripture and the “priesthood of all believers”—but Luther brought up butter at least a half dozen times. When Luther—as translated by C.M. Jacobs—expounded on unjust church taxes, he went into full rhetorical mode: “For at Rome they themselves laugh at the fasts, making us foreigners eat the oil with which they would not grease their shoes, and afterwards selling us liberty to eat butter and all sorts of other things … thinking it is a greater sin to eat butter is a greater sin than to lie, to swear, or even to live unchastely.”
It would later be concluded that the more dairy rich nations in Europe would break from the Catholic Church. The tradition of veganism is not a proud one as it was oil on the corruption of the Catholic Church to the point of Reformation in 1517.
Christianity Today, after championing a horrid tradition, moves to make a moral argument for veganism. First the article states that we should have compassion towards animals, implying that eating them is against creation. But rather than expanding and making a theological argument about creation, that likely assumes that there was no animal death prior to the fall, the moral argument rails against factory farming.
Bookless argues that factory farms that use unsustainable, inhumane practices violate God’s call to steward the earth and its creatures. “Some of our modern, intensive, industrial farming methods go plain against the teaching of Scripture on having compassion for God’s creation,” he said. Therefore, purchasing, preparing, and eating meat raised on this kind of farm could be seen as ethically, and perhaps even biblically, questionable.
I would disagree as this is a stretch, while not all meat farming is ethical, not all meat comes from such.
Daily meat consumption is relatively new in human history. According to Wilson J. Warren, author of Meat Makes People Powerful, global consumption of meat skyrocketed after World War II, driven by globalization, federal aid to factory farms, and expanded consumer markets—as well as hefty advertising from the meat industry. Beef in particular—the most resource-hungry of all meats—has been aggressively marketed to Americans. (Consider, for instance, the 1984 “Where’s the Beef” campaign, or the 1993 “Beef: It’s What’s for Dinner.”) This widespread marketing continues today: In 2019, the American beef industry spent over $40 million on advertising alone.
At what point is any of this bad? The expansion of meat in our diets has caused far fewer people to starve. If you want to feed the hungry, veganism is the opposite of how you do that. The abundance of food we now have is a good thing, a bounty to be thankful to God for.
In 2020, Americans are on track to eat more meat than ever before. And despite the recent introduction of a plethora of meat alternatives, the USDA predicts that Americans’ consumption of meat will only increase over the next decade.
Again, this is a good thing. Furthermore the plethora of meat alternatives are worse for you than meat itself.
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.
The differences between the Impossible Whopper and the real deal are rather nominal on the surface, however a deeper understanding of nutritional science favors the real meats in all of the above cases. Not all proteins are equal. Animal based protein is nutritionally superior to plant based proteins, especially soy which is bad for men. Plant proteins lack essential amino acids (the building block of what a protein is) in comparison to animal proteins.
In addition to a less complete amino acid portfolio these fake meats contain numerous suspect chemicals. For instance, Methylcellulose is a filler that has no health benefits and potential adverse effects.
Christianity Today continues its moral argument by denouncing consumerism, in a non sequitur. Then they promote climate hysteria, claiming that livestock contribute to climate change. It’s important to note, which they do not, that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Before closing the author cites Karen Swallow Prior, the one who said it’s ‘unChristlike” to refer to people who get and provide abortions as murderers and would go on to endorse the homosexual Revoice Conference, as a “Christian writer and thinker” further signaling the author’s lack of a Christian worldview. The article ends with conflating veganism and fasting.
When you have a Christian worldview, you do not rely on the standards that the world creates to make moral arguments for acting on Christian faith. There is no moral, let alone Christian, case to make for veganism, nor is there any reason to conflate abstaining from certain meats and animal products with fasting.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-01--Image of churchgoers turning their backs on Mike Bloomberg is everything

Billionaire Mike Bloomberg has nobody to blame but himself for fading so quickly from contention in the Democratic nomination race .
FiveThirtyEight now has him at a 0.4 % chance of securing the nomination before the convention despite having spent half a billion dollars already on his campaign .
What went so wrong ?
It all started with his first debate performance .
It was his first huge mistake of the election cycle after making essentially flawless decisions leading up to it .
Perhaps ego and encouragement from his advisers got the better of him ; he shouldn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he had established himself as a real player on Super Tuesday .
Now , he has deflated his once-promising campaign even after a slightly better second debate performance last week .
Senator Elizabeth Warren , who is proving to be a campaign-by-attack candidate who can only make news by talking about others , set her sights on Bloomberg and his non-disclosure agreements .
Dozens of women have settled with him and his companies over the decades , and Warren isn ’ t letting that attack route go even after he agreed to release @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Senator Bernie Sanders in January hurt her chances .
Going after Bloomberg isn ’ t helping , but at least it ’ s not hurting .
But the real dagger lodged into Bloomberg ’ s nomination chances came Saturday after an impressive showing by former Vice President Joe Biden .
His huge victory reestablished him as the frontrunner in the moderate lane , making Bloomberg ’ s onus to swoop in and save the party from Sanders no longer required , at least in the eyes of many Democratic voters .
Bloomberg desperately @ @ @ @ @ @ @ South Carolina .
What happened was nearly as dramatic as a phoenix rising from its ashes .
Where is Bloomberg now with two days before the biggest event of primary season ?
Sunday , he spoke at a church in Selma , Alabama , where a small but mightily symbolic group of churchgoers stood and turned their backs on him as he spoke .
It ’ s the exact image Bloomberg did not need .
It ’ s the image that should ( and probably will ) doom his campaign going forward .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ success without getting support from the Black community at the national level .
Had Sanders done so in 2016 , he would have been the nominee .
The Black vote saved Hillary Clinton thanks in large part to exertion of influence by the DNC through Black community leaders .
Bloomberg ’ s history of targeting minority men age 18-25 can not be erased no matter how many billions of dollars he spends on the attempt .
Sanders is still the most likely candidate to get a plurality of delegates before the Democratic National @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a majority have dipped below 30 % for the first time in a month , according to FiveThirtyEight .
They give a contested convention a 60 % chance .
The only redeeming quality of Mike Bloomberg is that he ’ s rich , and he ’ s running for the nomination in a party that is increasingly hostile towards wealth .
He is uninspiring and not nearly as smart as he believes .
Is his campaign already done ?
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Billionaire Mike Bloomberg has nobody to blame but himself for fading so quickly from contention in the Democratic nomination race. FiveThirtyEight now has him at a 0.4% chance of securing the nomination before the convention despite having spent half a billion dollars already on his campaign. What went so wrong?
It all started with his first debate performance. It was his first huge mistake of the election cycle after making essentially flawless decisions leading up to it. Perhaps ego and encouragement from his advisers got the better of him; he shouldn’t have been anywhere near a camera until he had established himself as a real player on Super Tuesday. Now, he has deflated his once-promising campaign even after a slightly better second debate performance last week.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, who is proving to be a campaign-by-attack candidate who can only make news by talking about others, set her sights on Bloomberg and his non-disclosure agreements. Dozens of women have settled with him and his companies over the decades, and Warren isn’t letting that attack route go even after he agreed to release three women from their NDAs. Attacking Senator Bernie Sanders in January hurt her chances. Going after Bloomberg isn’t helping, but at least it’s not hurting.
But the real dagger lodged into Bloomberg’s nomination chances came Saturday after an impressive showing by former Vice President Joe Biden. His huge victory reestablished him as the frontrunner in the moderate lane, making Bloomberg’s onus to swoop in and save the party from Sanders no longer required, at least in the eyes of many Democratic voters. Bloomberg desperately needed Biden to crash and burn in South Carolina. What happened was nearly as dramatic as a phoenix rising from its ashes.
Where is Bloomberg now with two days before the biggest event of primary season? Sunday, he spoke at a church in Selma, Alabama, where a small but mightily symbolic group of churchgoers stood and turned their backs on him as he spoke. It’s the exact image Bloomberg did not need. It’s the image that should (and probably will) doom his campaign going forward.
No Democratic candidate for president can find success without getting support from the Black community at the national level. Had Sanders done so in 2016, he would have been the nominee. The Black vote saved Hillary Clinton thanks in large part to exertion of influence by the DNC through Black community leaders. Bloomberg’s history of targeting minority men age 18-25 cannot be erased no matter how many billions of dollars he spends on the attempt.
Sanders is still the most likely candidate to get a plurality of delegates before the Democratic National Convention, but his chances of getting a majority have dipped below 30% for the first time in a month, according to FiveThirtyEight. They give a contested convention a 60% chance.
The only redeeming quality of Mike Bloomberg is that he’s rich, and he’s running for the nomination in a party that is increasingly hostile towards wealth. He is uninspiring and not nearly as smart as he believes. Is his campaign already done?
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-01--Extreme Retribution Punishment Orders: ‘Red flag’ laws are the death of due process and the Constitu

Extreme Retribution Punishment Orders: ‘Red flag’ laws are the death of due process and the Constitution

The founding fathers were true geniuses of their day .
They were also liberals .
Liberal and liberty stem from the same word meaning defenders of individual rights and freedoms .
One of these is the right of due process .
They knew that a struggle between an individual and a tyrannical government would be extremely lopsided with the government having the unlimited advantages of power and funding over someone without these things .
That is why they wrote the Bill of Rights to balance out this extreme disparity , providing individuals with certain unalienable rights .
The death of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ ERPOs ’ or so-called ‘ red flag ’ laws In their zeal to empower themselves and disarm the innocent , the nation ’ s socialist left has thrown away most of the protections for the individual in the Bill of Rights .
These unconstitutional abominations eviscerate the 1st , 2nd , 4th , 5th , 6th and 14th amendments .
It takes a certain level of chutzpah to call oneself a ‘ liberal ’ while advocating these offences against liberty and yet the left manages to pull it off .
But they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ good and protecting the children .
In a report from 9news , a ‘ Red flag ’ petition was filed against one of the law ’ s biggest opponents .
An inmate filed the ERPO against Weld County Colorado Sheriff Steve Reams and some deputies showing the danger of these gun confiscation orders .
The extreme risk protection order ( ERPO ) petition against Reams was filed by an inmate at the Weld County jail .
The red flag law allows for someone to petition the court and ask for a person ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are either a threat to themselves or others .
After it ’ s filed , a judge will evaluate and rule on the petition .
In Reams ’ case , the judge threw out the case without a hearing , because the inmate did not prove a threat .
Reams argued that his experience proved the red flag law could be used frivolously .
… ERPO paperwork requires the petitioner to say how they ’ re related to the person they want the guns taken away from .
In Reams ’ case , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he regularly resides or has regularly resided with the sheriff and his jail deputies within the last six months .
This isn ’ t the first time this kind of abuse has taken place , as reported on Bearing Arms a Colorado Woman was convicted of perjury , and now she claims to be a ‘ Political Prisoner ’ .
Keep in mind that these were cases that directly involved law enforcement as the targets of retribution .
Ordinary citizens can easily be caught in one of these due process abominations without any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ known as Extreme Retribution Punishment Orders The fact is every state in the nation already have laws to address the need for involuntary commitment of people who may be a danger to themselves or others , as we ’ ve detailed this before .
So there is no need for these laws , despite the lies that nothing exists for these kinds of crisis .
The same political faction that pushes ‘ assisted suicide ’ has contradictorily exploited the issue for the purpose of disarming the innocent in order to empower themselves .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Up , Not Down , In States With “ Red Flag ” Laws .
Research has shown that these don ’ t save lives or reduce crime .
But that doesn ’ t stop the liberty grabber left from trying to use this emotion laden issue to push for even more gun confiscation .
The bottom line : ‘ Red Flag ’ or ERPO ’ s do nothing but officially sanction gun confiscation swatting The nation ’ s socialist left doesn ’ t really care about ‘ gun safety ’ , they only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ willing to use any means to accomplish this goal , from exploiting emotional issues such as suicide or the rare occurrence of a mass shooting to changing words instead of changing laws – or the Constitution .
They love to exploit the language for their empowerment , using the term ‘ hate speech ’ to suppress free expression or the term ‘ assault weapon ’ to attack the right of self-defense .
Anything can be an assault weapon if it ’ s held correctly , everything from a Sopher Clamp to a Bat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
The founding fathers were true geniuses of their day. They were also liberals. Liberal and liberty stem from the same word meaning defenders of individual rights and freedoms.
One of these is the right of due process. They knew that a struggle between an individual and a tyrannical government would be extremely lopsided with the government having the unlimited advantages of power and funding over someone without these things. That is why they wrote the Bill of Rights to balance out this extreme disparity, providing individuals with certain unalienable rights.
The death of due process with gun confiscation swatting, ‘ERPOs’ or so-called ‘red flag’ laws
In their zeal to empower themselves and disarm the innocent, the nation’s socialist left has thrown away most of the protections for the individual in the Bill of Rights. These unconstitutional abominations eviscerate the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 14th amendments.
It takes a certain level of chutzpah to call oneself a ‘liberal’ while advocating these offences against liberty and yet the left manages to pull it off. But they have convinced themselves that they are doing good and protecting the children.
“To do evil a human being must first of all believe that what he’s doing is good” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
The absurdity of ‘red flag’ Extreme Retribution Punishment Orders
In a report from 9news, a ‘Red flag’ petition was filed against one of the law’s biggest opponents. An inmate filed the ERPO against Weld County Colorado Sheriff Steve Reams and some deputies showing the danger of these gun confiscation orders.
The extreme risk protection order (ERPO) petition against Reams was filed by an inmate at the Weld County jail. The red flag law allows for someone to petition the court and ask for a person’s gun to be removed if they are either a threat to themselves or others. After it’s filed, a judge will evaluate and rule on the petition. In Reams’ case, the judge threw out the case without a hearing, because the inmate did not prove a threat. Reams argued that his experience proved the red flag law could be used frivolously.
…
ERPO paperwork requires the petitioner to say how they’re related to the person they want the guns taken away from. In Reams’ case, the inmate checked a box saying that he regularly resides or has regularly resided with the sheriff and his jail deputies within the last six months.
[Emphasis added]
This isn’t the first time this kind of abuse has taken place, as reported on Bearing Arms a Colorado Woman was convicted of perjury, and now she claims to be a ‘Political Prisoner’.
Keep in mind that these were cases that directly involved law enforcement as the targets of retribution. Ordinary citizens can easily be caught in one of these due process abominations without any recourse.
ERPO’s should be known as Extreme Retribution Punishment Orders
The fact is every state in the nation already have laws to address the need for involuntary commitment of people who may be a danger to themselves or others, as we’ve detailed this before. So there is no need for these laws, despite the lies that nothing exists for these kinds of crisis.
The same political faction that pushes ‘assisted suicide’ has contradictorily exploited the issue for the purpose of disarming the innocent in order to empower themselves. The fact is that Suicides Are Going Up, Not Down, In States With “Red Flag” Laws. Research has shown that these don’t save lives or reduce crime. But that doesn’t stop the liberty grabber left from trying to use this emotion laden issue to push for even more gun confiscation.
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!
The bottom line: ‘Red Flag’ or ERPO’s do nothing but officially sanction gun confiscation swatting
The nation’s socialist left doesn’t really care about ‘gun safety’, they only care about gun confiscation. They are willing to use any means to accomplish this goal, from exploiting emotional issues such as suicide or the rare occurrence of a mass shooting to changing words instead of changing laws – or the Constitution.
They love to exploit the language for their empowerment, using the term ‘hate speech’ to suppress free expression or the term ‘assault weapon’ to attack the right of self-defense. Anything can be an assault weapon if it’s held correctly, everything from a Sopher Clamp to a Bat’leth.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-02--Third Israeli election in a year means nothing—and everything—to America’s relations in the Middle E

Third Israeli election in a year means nothing—and everything—to America’s relations in the Middle East

The differences between President Trump and any of the Democratic candidates couldn ’ t be more numerous or consequential .
Even the “ moderate ” Democrats are diametrically opposed across the board to President Trump ’ s policies .
It ’ s literally every issue ; there hasn ’ t been much in the way of bipartisan agreement about major issues since the Iraq War .
The Israeli elections are often framed as having similar dispositions between the right-wing bloc of Likud with their conservative allies and the Blue and White center-left group .
But that ’ s simply not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between the two groups when it comes to several domestic policies , but Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz are extremely similar in how they view the United States , Israel ’ s role in the Middle East , and the enemies that surround the Jewish state .
That ’ s not to say there are no consequences for America if Netanyahu loses .
We ’ ll cover those shortly .
But the way the two men will interact with the United States are very similar .
We saw this last month when Vice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ White House for the unveiling of the Trump administration ’ s Middle East Peace plan .
Appropriately , Netanyahu asked Pence to invite Gantz as well .
It was necessary ; the last thing Netanyahu needed was for the peace plan to be viewed as a political show back home .
He wasn ’ t just being polite by asking for his opponent to join him .
He was thinking in Israel ’ s best interests .
As a result , both leaders expressed support for the peace plan , to President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ military leaders with a severe distrust of Iran , Lebanon , and Hezbollah .
Both want to annex parts of the West Bank , though Netanyahu will likely be a bit more bold about it .
Both view a peace-through-strength stance as the only way to properly defend Israel .
In a vacuum , it would seem like either leader would be good for U.S.-Israeli relations and keeping Israel safe .
But there ’ s a caveat .
Unless today ’ s elections go wildly to the left , the most likely path @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government is by bringing the Arab List onto his team .
That would be disastrous for relations as it would give an exaggerated degree of power to pro-Palestinian MKs .
They would negotiate cabinet positions , some of which could work to turn the the United States against Israel .
It wouldn ’ t be catastrophic ; Gantz would still sit in the PM ’ s chair .
But it wouldn ’ t be ideal .
If the wrong moves are made in forming a left-leaning coalition , the enemies of Israel and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a result .
This is the third election in less than a year .
It seems unfathomable that this one won ’ t result in the formation of a new government .
That ’ s good news if Likud gets the upper hand .
It could be horrible news if a desperate Blue and White embraces the Arab List out of necessity .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
The differences between President Trump and any of the Democratic candidates couldn’t be more numerous or consequential. Even the “moderate” Democrats are diametrically opposed across the board to President Trump’s policies. It’s literally every issue; there hasn’t been much in the way of bipartisan agreement about major issues since the Iraq War.
The Israeli elections are often framed as having similar dispositions between the right-wing bloc of Likud with their conservative allies and the Blue and White center-left group. But that’s simply not the case. There are clear differences between the two groups when it comes to several domestic policies, but Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz are extremely similar in how they view the United States, Israel’s role in the Middle East, and the enemies that surround the Jewish state.
That’s not to say there are no consequences for America if Netanyahu loses. We’ll cover those shortly. But the way the two men will interact with the United States are very similar. We saw this last month when Vice President Mike Pence invited Netanyahu to the White House for the unveiling of the Trump administration’s Middle East Peace plan. Appropriately, Netanyahu asked Pence to invite Gantz as well. It was necessary; the last thing Netanyahu needed was for the peace plan to be viewed as a political show back home. He wasn’t just being polite by asking for his opponent to join him. He was thinking in Israel’s best interests. As a result, both leaders expressed support for the peace plan, to President Trump’s delight.
Both candidates are military leaders with a severe distrust of Iran, Lebanon, and Hezbollah. Both want to annex parts of the West Bank, though Netanyahu will likely be a bit more bold about it. Both view a peace-through-strength stance as the only way to properly defend Israel. In a vacuum, it would seem like either leader would be good for U.S.-Israeli relations and keeping Israel safe.
But there’s a caveat. Unless today’s elections go wildly to the left, the most likely path through which Gantz could form a coalition government is by bringing the Arab List onto his team. That would be disastrous for relations as it would give an exaggerated degree of power to pro-Palestinian MKs. They would negotiate cabinet positions, some of which could work to turn the the United States against Israel. It wouldn’t be catastrophic; Gantz would still sit in the PM’s chair. But it wouldn’t be ideal. If the wrong moves are made in forming a left-leaning coalition, the enemies of Israel and the United States would be bolstered as a result.
This is the third election in less than a year. It seems unfathomable that this one won’t result in the formation of a new government. That’s good news if Likud gets the upper hand. It could be horrible news if a desperate Blue and White embraces the Arab List out of necessity.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]