noqreport--2020-01-20--Democrat enthusiasm is critically low

Democrat enthusiasm is critically low

I live in what ’ s left of Maryland , a Democrat stronghold , and despite the migrant caravan of Democrat candidates , visible support is scant .
A survey of bumper stickers would have Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders as the top candidates because people refused to remove these losing candidates from their cars to avoid looking dumb .
Otherwise support for any candidate is scant .
I once saw a Cory Booker bumper sticker several months ago before a debate .
I ’ ve seen a single Elizabeth Warren , and maybe two Joe Biden stickers .
Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far out .
However the lack of enthusiasm among Democrats is not limited to anecdotal evidence .
Polling data suggests that the Iowa Caucus and New Hampshire Primary are wide open with majority of voters undecided or fluid in their choice .
Compare this to four years ago when Ted Cruz was building momentum against frontrunner Trump .
It was known the Iowa Caucus would come down to Trump , Cruz , or maybe Rubio .
And on the Democrat side , the enthusiasm for Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton was raging .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Iowa Caucus goers are firm in their choice .
With 60 % undecided or persuadable , the Iowa Caucus is undoubtedly to be won by whoever can have the most widespread organization and enthusiasm .
But who can that be ?
The same poll shows that Elizabeth Warren has the highest favorability at 70 % followed by Pete Buttigieg at 68 % and Bernie Sanders at 66 % .
So on one hand Democrats in Iowa like their options , on the other , they balance their priorities .
Is the priority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Majority in the poll said beating Trump .
This bodes well for fluidity , as Trump has changed the conventions we knew about elections substantially , so Democrats are even less clear on a formula to beat Trump .
This struggle resembles the 2012 Republican Primary .
The Republican voters prioritized beating Obama but struggled to find a candidate that could knowing that Mitt Romney could not .
This led to Rick Santorum being the last desperate attempt to nominate a person to communicate a winning message .
2012 had the opposite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their nominees all that much , but the anybody but Obama message was communicated , so Republicans nominated the closest thing they could to Obama .
Likewise , Democrats could similarly blunder by nominating Elizabeth Warren .
It ’ s difficult to articulate that Trump ’ s a racist when Elizabeth Warren lied about her race to her own benefit , also difficult to call Trump a liar , nominating Warren .
It ’ s difficult to argue that Trump abused power with Ukraine when your son was benefiting from your office , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charge of racism is one Pete Buttigieg can not make either .
Bernie Sanders may come away cleanest when it comes to being free from the hypocrisy that stains the current Democrat field .
But there are obvious reasons why America might are reluctant to undergo a Bolshevik Revolution .
The other candidates don ’ t have a base .
Who can win ?
A question no serious candidate has yet to answer , and this results in crippling the enthusiasm for most of the base .
Alternatively there is a sizable minority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their belief with or without a strong case of beating Trump .
Bernie Sanders likely wins this crowd given his past Presidential run and loyal base of support .
Whereas , Pete Buttigieg , Champion of the Intersectionality Base , has some of this going for him as well because white guilt works on suburbanites .
Joe Biden purely relies on the beating Trump narrative , and Elizabeth Warren is inbetween .
In 2016 , where there was no incumbent President , we saw Republicans overwhelmingly reject the Establishment with Donald Trump and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their own establishment .
In 2008 , Democrats were intense this time of year .
The presence of an incumbent introduces standards for a Primary that curb certain political zeal .
Instead of enthusiasm for political candidates and policy proposals , we have extra Trump Derangement Syndrome .
But politics without zeal is not a winning strategy against an incumbent .
Ronald Reagan brought a sense of enthusiasm to one-term Jimmy Carter .
Bill Clinton had Ross Perot .
Otherwise , incumbents have dominated the general election in the primary era .
Polling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the candidates heading into the key swing states .
And that doesn ’ t include the states Trump may put into play in 2020 like Minnesota , since incumbents have a tendency to win larger margins the second time around .
In 2020 , elections are less about convincing “ moderates ” and more about rallying the bases to show up in droves .
This would make base enthusiasm even more necessary in the general .
The Democrats are mostly in favor of a negative message , as opposed to a positive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ term presidents .
So we must ask ourselves : does the quest to beat the incumbent curb vital enthusiasm necessary to win ?
If so , then the Democrats are in trouble in November .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
I live in what’s left of Maryland, a Democrat stronghold, and despite the migrant caravan of Democrat candidates, visible support is scant. A survey of bumper stickers would have Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders as the top candidates because people refused to remove these losing candidates from their cars to avoid looking dumb. Otherwise support for any candidate is scant. I once saw a Cory Booker bumper sticker several months ago before a debate. I’ve seen a single Elizabeth Warren, and maybe two Joe Biden stickers. Biden is most likely to win Maryland this far out.
However the lack of enthusiasm among Democrats is not limited to anecdotal evidence. Polling data suggests that the Iowa Caucus and New Hampshire Primary are wide open with majority of voters undecided or fluid in their choice. Compare this to four years ago when Ted Cruz was building momentum against frontrunner Trump. It was known the Iowa Caucus would come down to Trump, Cruz, or maybe Rubio. And on the Democrat side, the enthusiasm for Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton was raging. According to recent data, 40% of Iowa Caucus goers are firm in their choice. With 60% undecided or persuadable, the Iowa Caucus is undoubtedly to be won by whoever can have the most widespread organization and enthusiasm. But who can that be?
The same poll shows that Elizabeth Warren has the highest favorability at 70% followed by Pete Buttigieg at 68% and Bernie Sanders at 66%. So on one hand Democrats in Iowa like their options, on the other, they balance their priorities. Is the priority beating Trump or is the priority ideological. Majority in the poll said beating Trump. This bodes well for fluidity, as Trump has changed the conventions we knew about elections substantially, so Democrats are even less clear on a formula to beat Trump.
This struggle resembles the 2012 Republican Primary. The Republican voters prioritized beating Obama but struggled to find a candidate that could knowing that Mitt Romney could not. This led to Rick Santorum being the last desperate attempt to nominate a person to communicate a winning message. 2012 had the opposite problem where Republicans didn’t like their nominees all that much, but the anybody but Obama message was communicated, so Republicans nominated the closest thing they could to Obama.
Likewise, Democrats could similarly blunder by nominating Elizabeth Warren. It’s difficult to articulate that Trump’s a racist when Elizabeth Warren lied about her race to her own benefit, also difficult to call Trump a liar, nominating Warren. It’s difficult to argue that Trump abused power with Ukraine when your son was benefiting from your office, in regards to Joe Biden. The charge of racism is one Pete Buttigieg cannot make either. Bernie Sanders may come away cleanest when it comes to being free from the hypocrisy that stains the current Democrat field. But there are obvious reasons why America might are reluctant to undergo a Bolshevik Revolution. The other candidates don’t have a base. Who can win? A question no serious candidate has yet to answer, and this results in crippling the enthusiasm for most of the base.
Alternatively there is a sizable minority that wants a candidate that aligns with their belief with or without a strong case of beating Trump. Bernie Sanders likely wins this crowd given his past Presidential run and loyal base of support. Whereas, Pete Buttigieg, Champion of the Intersectionality Base, has some of this going for him as well because white guilt works on suburbanites. Joe Biden purely relies on the beating Trump narrative, and Elizabeth Warren is inbetween.
In 2016, where there was no incumbent President, we saw Republicans overwhelmingly reject the Establishment with Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. Democrats similarly battled with their own establishment. In 2008, Democrats were intense this time of year. The presence of an incumbent introduces standards for a Primary that curb certain political zeal. Instead of enthusiasm for political candidates and policy proposals, we have extra Trump Derangement Syndrome.
But politics without zeal is not a winning strategy against an incumbent. Ronald Reagan brought a sense of enthusiasm to one-term Jimmy Carter. Bill Clinton had Ross Perot. Otherwise, incumbents have dominated the general election in the primary era. Polling shows that Trump is ahead of any of the candidates heading into the key swing states. And that doesn’t include the states Trump may put into play in 2020 like Minnesota, since incumbents have a tendency to win larger margins the second time around.
In 2020, elections are less about convincing “moderates” and more about rallying the bases to show up in droves. This would make base enthusiasm even more necessary in the general. The Democrats are mostly in favor of a negative message, as opposed to a positive one that wins general elections for first term presidents. So we must ask ourselves: does the quest to beat the incumbent curb vital enthusiasm necessary to win?
If so, then the Democrats are in trouble in November.
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-20--Buzz Patterson, impeachment, and the ‘national security’ scam

Pop quiz : How many Americans have been injured or killed fighting in Ukraine against the Russians ?
If you answered “ zero , ” then you clearly haven ’ t bought into the Democrats ’ impeachment narrative or mainstream media ’ s propaganda supporting that narrative .
They want us to believe that the Ukraine-Biden incident is a matter of “ national security ” so grim that they had to rush through impeachment in the House only to hold the Articles for a month .
If none of that makes sense to you , it will be pleasing to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Unfortunately , an oddly high number of Americans HAVE bought into the narrative that if President Trump is not removed from office by the Senate , then the nation ’ s security is at risk and Americans will die .
In Ukraine .
Or something .
Congressional candidate Lt. Col. ( ret ) Buzz Patterson had a reaction to that narrative that simplifies the issue .
In short , he ’ s as confused by the narrative as the rest of us .
As a candidate in California ’ s 7th District @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how a Republican can win .
But the district isn ’ t like others in California metro areas where the Democrats have a stranglehold .
CA-07 is a purple district in which the right Republican can unseat a Democrat .
We ’ re very hopeful that Patterson is up to the task .
Unlike most congressional candidates , Patterson has actually lived in the White House before .
He carried the “ nuclear football ” for President Clinton , accompanying him everywhere with the instant and final response to aggression against America .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ he knows how to handle pressure .
And as a stalwart conservative , he knows what America needs in order to continue improving in this new decade .
What CA-07 and Washington DC need is someone like Buzz Patterson who knows which direction we need to go and who understands how to handle the pressures of the job .
He clearly understands the idiocy of this impeachment debacle as well .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Pop quiz: How many Americans have been injured or killed fighting in Ukraine against the Russians? If you answered “zero,” then you clearly haven’t bought into the Democrats’ impeachment narrative or mainstream media’s propaganda supporting that narrative. They want us to believe that the Ukraine-Biden incident is a matter of “national security” so grim that they had to rush through impeachment in the House only to hold the Articles for a month.
If none of that makes sense to you, it will be pleasing to hear that you’re not alone. Unfortunately, an oddly high number of Americans HAVE bought into the narrative that if President Trump is not removed from office by the Senate, then the nation’s security is at risk and Americans will die. In Ukraine. Or something.
Congressional candidate Lt. Col. (ret) Buzz Patterson had a reaction to that narrative that simplifies the issue. In short, he’s as confused by the narrative as the rest of us.
I’m scratching my head and I still can’t figure out how withholding military aid from Ukraine for a few weeks has ANYTHING to do with OUR national security. — Buzz Patterson for Congress (@BuzzPatterson) January 19, 2020
As a candidate in California’s 7th District in eastern Sacramento, one might wonder how a Republican can win. But the district isn’t like others in California metro areas where the Democrats have a stranglehold. CA-07 is a purple district in which the right Republican can unseat a Democrat. We’re very hopeful that Patterson is up to the task.
Unlike most congressional candidates, Patterson has actually lived in the White House before. He carried the “nuclear football” for President Clinton, accompanying him everywhere with the instant and final response to aggression against America. As an Air Force fighter pilot, he knows how to handle pressure. And as a stalwart conservative, he knows what America needs in order to continue improving in this new decade.
What CA-07 and Washington DC need is someone like Buzz Patterson who knows which direction we need to go and who understands how to handle the pressures of the job. He clearly understands the idiocy of this impeachment debacle as well.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-20--NY Times endorses TWO Democrats for president in ill-conceived effort to remain relevant

Did the NY Times endorse someone from the far-left lane or the moderate lane in this election cycle ?
Yes .
And they did so in a way that was so blatantly pandering to the entirety of the Democratic Party that it should be seen as an insult by both progressives and centrists in the party .
In a first for the publication , they chose to endorse two candidates : Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar .
Their accompanying article does its best to pretend like their decision was not self-serving and strategic , but one does not have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ motivation was simply to not anger either side of their regular readership .
It ’ s a move that is defined as both a hedging of their bets and a safety net to fall on in case either of their endorsements actually win the nomination .
In other words , they didn ’ t want to make either side of the Democratic Party too angry now and they definitely do not want to get blamed for propelling one side or the other to a nomination that precedes a general election loss .
What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re scared .
They couldn ’ t commit to a lane any faster than Senator Kamala Harris , playing the same political chameleon games the failed candidate tried to play .
Was she a progressive or a centrist ?
It all depending on the audience at the moment .
The NY Times Editorial board took the same approach out of fear of making one side or the other upset that someone from their lane wasn ’ t picked .
It ’ s a microcosm of the division within the Democratic Party today .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ adamant about a radical getting the nomination as there are Democrats who fear a radical will propel President Trump to a second term .
Conversely , there are as many people clinging to the Democratic Party of old as there are people who want nothing less than fundamental change in the party and the nation .
And through it all , President Trump enjoys historic unity within the Republican Party and a mandate that changed from Make America Great Again to Keep America Great .
It ’ s a testament to the success @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the NY Times Editorial Board translated into total failure .
The way the story is written , one would think the economy is in shambles , America is stuck in a half-dozen wars , and Antifa is the new Peace Corps .
This is their saving grace among Democrats who will be displeased by their throwaway endorsements ; at least they still hate President Trump , so their regular readers can agree on that , though few they may be .
They endorsed Warren for being the lesser-of-two radicals and they endorsed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a fatal flaw .
Doing so means they really aren ’ t sure who ’ s going to win so they might as well go with the safest bet in each lane .
I can not stress how weak and underwhelming this move is from a news outlet that once yielded so much power .
Today , they ’ re a shell of The Gray Lady that can not seem to reconcile their place in this new world .
Their motto , “ All the News That ’ s Fit to Print , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stay true to the times .
When was the last time you picked up a physical newspaper in which the news is printed ?
Here ’ s a breakdown of their critiques of the candidates they didn ’ t endorse : • Bernie Sanders : Too rigid in his Marxism • Joe Biden : Regressive policies that won ’ t make him more electable • Pete Buttigieg : Too young , maybe next time • Michael Bloomberg : He didn ’ t take our interview • Tom Steyer : Not mentioned at all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cowardly endorsement the NY Times has ever made .
They ’ ve never taken both sides .
Are they feeling the financial squeeze from President Trump ’ s attacks ?
Is the Democratic Party really that broken ?
Will their endorsement ( s ) mean anything ?
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Did the NY Times endorse someone from the far-left lane or the moderate lane in this election cycle? Yes. And they did so in a way that was so blatantly pandering to the entirety of the Democratic Party that it should be seen as an insult by both progressives and centrists in the party.
In a first for the publication, they chose to endorse two candidates: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. Their accompanying article does its best to pretend like their decision was not self-serving and strategic, but one does not have to be a pundit to realize their motivation was simply to not anger either side of their regular readership. It’s a move that is defined as both a hedging of their bets and a safety net to fall on in case either of their endorsements actually win the nomination. In other words, they didn’t want to make either side of the Democratic Party too angry now and they definitely do not want to get blamed for propelling one side or the other to a nomination that precedes a general election loss.
What this really tells us is they’re scared. They couldn’t commit to a lane any faster than Senator Kamala Harris, playing the same political chameleon games the failed candidate tried to play. Was she a progressive or a centrist? It all depending on the audience at the moment. The NY Times Editorial board took the same approach out of fear of making one side or the other upset that someone from their lane wasn’t picked.
It’s a microcosm of the division within the Democratic Party today. There are as many Democrats who are adamant about a radical getting the nomination as there are Democrats who fear a radical will propel President Trump to a second term. Conversely, there are as many people clinging to the Democratic Party of old as there are people who want nothing less than fundamental change in the party and the nation.
And through it all, President Trump enjoys historic unity within the Republican Party and a mandate that changed from Make America Great Again to Keep America Great. It’s a testament to the success of his first term, a success that the NY Times Editorial Board translated into total failure. The way the story is written, one would think the economy is in shambles, America is stuck in a half-dozen wars, and Antifa is the new Peace Corps. This is their saving grace among Democrats who will be displeased by their throwaway endorsements; at least they still hate President Trump, so their regular readers can agree on that, though few they may be.
They endorsed Warren for being the lesser-of-two radicals and they endorsed Klobuchar for being the only moderate without a fatal flaw. Doing so means they really aren’t sure who’s going to win so they might as well go with the safest bet in each lane. I cannot stress how weak and underwhelming this move is from a news outlet that once yielded so much power. Today, they’re a shell of The Gray Lady that cannot seem to reconcile their place in this new world. Their motto, “All the News That’s Fit to Print,” is indicative of their inability to stay true to the times. When was the last time you picked up a physical newspaper in which the news is printed?
Here’s a breakdown of their critiques of the candidates they didn’t endorse:
Bernie Sanders: Too rigid in his Marxism
Too rigid in his Marxism Joe Biden: Regressive policies that won’t make him more electable
Regressive policies that won’t make him more electable Pete Buttigieg: Too young, maybe next time
Too young, maybe next time Andrew Yang: Not enough experience, start smaller
Not enough experience, start smaller Michael Bloomberg: He didn’t take our interview
He didn’t take our interview Tom Steyer: Not mentioned at all for some reason
Not mentioned at all for some reason Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Steve Bullock, Michael Bennet, Deval Patrick, Jay Inslee: Mentioned for some reason
Mentioned for some reason Tulsi Gabbard: Not mentioned for obvious reasons
This was the most cowardly endorsement the NY Times has ever made. They’ve never taken both sides. Are they feeling the financial squeeze from President Trump’s attacks? Is the Democratic Party really that broken? Will their endorsement(s) mean anything?
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-20--We are in a struggle for liberty. Why are we allowing the left to make it just about guns?

The latest lie from the liberty grabber left is an attempt to smear innocent freedom advocates on the right as equivalent to KKK members , Nazis and White supremacists .
The next few days will see them work overtime to equate ‘ gun-rights advocates ’ with every ‘ hate group ’ imaginable , simply because they want to keep their unalienable human rights .
This smear from the authoritarian left and their comrades in the media is more than infuriating given “ The Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party.
” The National Socialist German @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far-left organisation repeatedly proven here , here , here , here and here , along with their white supremacist brethren .
The authoritarian far-left always has a tendency to follow the dictates of it ’ s historical icons Hitler and Lenin in repeating a lie until it ’ s forcibly the truth .
In this case they are cuing up the lie that ‘ gun-rights advocates ’ are the same as KKK members , Nazis and White supremacists .
This is the reason we need to change the debate by changing its terms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of inanimate objects of aluminium and steel .
• Why does the left always use the word gun in their assault against liberty ?
• Why do they call it gun violence or gun violence prevention ?
• Why is it gun safety or gun reform ?
• Why do they try to avoid the word control in these discussions ?
• Does it make any sense to allow the left to exploit the word gun when this is a fight over freedom ?
There are several reasons why the liberty grabber left @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in their fake news efforts .
These also make the case for using the more appropriate terms freedom and liberty , but we will get to that in a moment .
1 .
People have rights , guns do not This is reason enough to avoid using the deceptive language of the national socialist left .
Subtly couching the debate in these terms yields them a tremendous advantage – one that we of the pro-liberty right convey to them when we also use this term to our detriment .
The left wants to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of liberty , since it clearly puts them in an extremely bad light .
That is why they exploit these terms so they keep the debate away from the issue of our unalienable human rights .
2 .
Guns are scary to some We do ourselves a great disservice when we allow the left to dictate the terms of the debate in terms of scary looking objects that make loud noises and can be dangerous in the wrong hands .
Framing the debate in terms of these objects alienates those who support liberty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get past the fear factor of firearms .
Compare the fear of guns with a fear of liberty or freedom , aside from leftists , who want this only for themselves , no one has an issue with these concepts .
Couching the debate in terms of liberty opens up the possibility for a number of new supporters for the cause .
That alone should be reason enough to frame the argument in terms of liberty or freedom .
3 .
The authoritarian left is all about control The same logic that proves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in terms of liberty also provides the rationale to use of the word control in this debate .
Parenthetically speaking , the fact that the authoritarian left wants to avoid this term is reason enough to use it .
• Why do they avoid the obvious connection between the control of liberty and socialism ?
• Why does the liberty grabber left smear opponents of their control schemes as racists ?
• Lastly , why do they studiously avoid the terms liberty and freedom in these discussions of our unalienable human rights ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ connection between socialism and the control of liberty .
Socialism is essentially the concentration of power into the hands of a leftist authoritarian elite .
It attains this concentration of power , with never to be fulfilled promises of security and the radical redistribution of wealth for the purpose of centralized control of society – ultimately by force .
It can only attain its control with a monopoly on the use of force .
Or as Mao Zedong termed it : Arms in the hands of the people ensures the conservation of individual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not abide the people having this power .
The collectivist ideologies of socialism and fascism demand a monopoly on the use of force .
This is why the left obsesses over gun confiscation while lying that they obsess over gun confiscation .
The Bottom-Line : This is a fight over liberty , not inanimate objects A superb article in ‘ The Arbalest Quarrel ’ made the point that the radical left seeks to get rid of the Constitution , beginning with the second amendment .
Kevin D. Williamson in National Review made this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article entitled : Democrats vs. the Constitution .
Make no mistake , the authoritarian left wants this debate to be in terms of inanimate objects without any rights .
Keeping it in these terms lets them side-step any issues on liberty and the unalienable rights of human beings .
This is why it is imperative that we stop using the language of the left and frame this debate in its proper context .
This is a fight over liberty .
The 2nd Amendment is just the first target of the authoritarians .
Allowing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ terms of inanimate objects is a major mistake .
Just as it is also a mistake to not correct the record that the Klan , Nazis and others are part of the nation ’ s socialist left .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive @ @

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
The latest lie from the liberty grabber left is an attempt to smear innocent freedom advocates on the right as equivalent to KKK members, Nazis and White supremacists. The next few days will see them work overtime to equate ‘gun-rights advocates’ with every ‘hate group’ imaginable, simply because they want to keep their unalienable human rights.
This smear from the authoritarian left and their comrades in the media is more than infuriating given “The Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party.” The National Socialist German Workers’ Party or Nazis was a far-left organisation repeatedly proven here, here, here, here and here, along with their white supremacist brethren.
The authoritarian far-left always has a tendency to follow the dictates of it’s historical icons Hitler and Lenin in repeating a lie until it’s forcibly the truth. In this case they are cuing up the lie that ‘gun-rights advocates’ are the same as KKK members, Nazis and White supremacists. This is the reason we need to change the debate by changing its terms to one of freedom and liberty instead of inanimate objects of aluminium and steel.
Questioning the liberty grabber left’s obsession with inanimate objects.
Why does the left always use the word gun in their assault against liberty?
in their assault against liberty? Why do they call it gun violence or gun violence prevention?
violence or violence prevention? Why is it gun safety or gun reform?
safety or reform? Why do they try to avoid the word control in these discussions?
in these discussions? Does it make any sense to allow the left to exploit the word gun when this is a fight over freedom?
There are several reasons why the liberty grabber left incessantly exploits the term “gun” in their fake news efforts. These also make the case for using the more appropriate terms freedom and liberty, but we will get to that in a moment.
1. People have rights, guns do not
This is reason enough to avoid using the deceptive language of the national socialist left. Subtly couching the debate in these terms yields them a tremendous advantage – one that we of the pro-liberty right convey to them when we also use this term to our detriment.
The left wants to scrupulously avoid the issue of their destruction of liberty, since it clearly puts them in an extremely bad light. That is why they exploit these terms so they keep the debate away from the issue of our unalienable human rights.
2. Guns are scary to some
We do ourselves a great disservice when we allow the left to dictate the terms of the debate in terms of scary looking objects that make loud noises and can be dangerous in the wrong hands. Framing the debate in terms of these objects alienates those who support liberty in other ways, but cannot get past the fear factor of firearms.
Compare the fear of guns with a fear of liberty or freedom, aside from leftists, who want this only for themselves, no one has an issue with these concepts. Couching the debate in terms of liberty opens up the possibility for a number of new supporters for the cause. That alone should be reason enough to frame the argument in terms of liberty or freedom.
3. The authoritarian left is all about control
The same logic that proves that we need to set the debate in terms of liberty also provides the rationale to use of the word control in this debate. Parenthetically speaking, the fact that the authoritarian left wants to avoid this term is reason enough to use it.
Why do they avoid the obvious connection between the control of liberty and socialism?
of liberty and socialism? Why does the liberty grabber left smear opponents of their control schemes as racists?
schemes as racists? Lastly, why do they studiously avoid the terms liberty and freedom in these discussions of our unalienable human rights?
There is always a hidden but direct connection between socialism and the control of liberty. Socialism is essentially the concentration of power into the hands of a leftist authoritarian elite. It attains this concentration of power, with never to be fulfilled promises of security and the radical redistribution of wealth for the purpose of centralized control of society – ultimately by force. It can only attain its control with a monopoly on the use of force. Or as Mao Zedong termed it:
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!
“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.”
Arms in the hands of the people ensures the conservation of individual liberty. The national socialist left cannot abide the people having this power. The collectivist ideologies of socialism and fascism demand a monopoly on the use of force. This is why the left obsesses over gun confiscation while lying that they obsess over gun confiscation.
The Bottom-Line: This is a fight over liberty, not inanimate objects
A superb article in ‘The Arbalest Quarrel’ made the point that the radical left seeks to get rid of the Constitution, beginning with the second amendment. Kevin D. Williamson in National Review made this case over a year ago in an article entitled: Democrats vs. the Constitution.
Make no mistake, the authoritarian left wants this debate to be in terms of inanimate objects without any rights. Keeping it in these terms lets them side-step any issues on liberty and the unalienable rights of human beings. This is why it is imperative that we stop using the language of the left and frame this debate in its proper context.
This is a fight over liberty. The 2nd Amendment is just the first target of the authoritarians. Allowing the left to frame the discussion in terms of inanimate objects is a major mistake. Just as it is also a mistake to not correct the record that the Klan, Nazis and others are part of the nation’s socialist left.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-20--Don Jr. lambastes CNN for concern over Jeffrey Epstein’s environmental record

If you search CNN.com for “ Jeffrey Epstein , ” you may not find what you seek .
If you ’ re concerned about the dead pedophile ’ s numerous victims or even the odd circumstances surrounding his alleged suicide , you won ’ t find any stories on the first page with 10 results .
In fact , page two with the next 10 listings only have three that match Epstein ’ s most notorious exploits .
What you WILL find are several stories about President Trump ’ s impeachment , which is tangentially connected to Epstein through his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ll also find stories about Evelyn Yang , Ukraine , Harry and Meghan , and the environment .
Wait , the environment ?
Yes .
After combing through the Virgin Islands ’ lawsuit against the Epstein estate , CNN found something that really triggered them .
Underage sexual assault ?
No .
Evading law enforcement ?
No .
Bribing officials ?
No .
CNN honed in on his environmental crimes , and Donald Trump Jr. called them out for it .
Now radical progressives have a reason to be upset with Jeffrey @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is the source of all of our problems in their eyes .
And CNN played right into it , triggering themselves all the way to even lower ratings than usual .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
If you search CNN.com for “Jeffrey Epstein,” you may not find what you seek. If you’re concerned about the dead pedophile’s numerous victims or even the odd circumstances surrounding his alleged suicide, you won’t find any stories on the first page with 10 results. In fact, page two with the next 10 listings only have three that match Epstein’s most notorious exploits.
What you WILL find are several stories about President Trump’s impeachment, which is tangentially connected to Epstein through his former lawyer, Alan Dershowitz. You’ll also find stories about Evelyn Yang, Ukraine, Harry and Meghan, and the environment. Wait, the environment? Yes. After combing through the Virgin Islands’ lawsuit against the Epstein estate, CNN found something that really triggered them. Underage sexual assault? No. Evading law enforcement? No. Bribing officials? No. CNN honed in on his environmental crimes, and Donald Trump Jr. called them out for it.
OMG this is real! It’s not that he molested children that got CNN to pay attention it’s that he didn’t have high regard for the environment! WTF CNN?!? Jeffrey Epstein's disregard for environmental protections showed his disrespect for the law – CNN https://t.co/6EPTUZlrW3 — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) January 19, 2020
Now radical progressives have a reason to be upset with Jeffrey Epstein. Climate change, after all, is the source of all of our problems in their eyes. And CNN played right into it, triggering themselves all the way to even lower ratings than usual.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-21--Media’s Virginia rally narrative implodes to the surprise of no one on the right

We were told that a bunch of pro-liberty patriots getting together with guns *gasp !
* would surely lead to violence .
We were told that it was going to be a ‘ white nationalist rally in Virginia ’ .
That nothing good can ever come from people defending their unalienable human rights .
Then wouldn ’ t you know it , practical reality intercedes to decimate their pre-written story .
First , there was the condemnation of a ‘ journalist ’ from NBC that couldn ’ t resist in pushing the ‘ white supremacist ’ false narrative to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : NBC News ’ Ben Collins slammed for warning of ‘ white nationalist rally in Virginia ’ : Ahead of Monday ’ s gun-rights rally in Virginia , NBC News reporter Ben Collins labeled the event a “ white nationalist ” gathering Sunday , even as he warned against spreading “ made-up stuff ” on Twitter — prompting scores of critics to point out the apparent irony , and to condemn his network for sanctioning Collins ’ checkered reporting on the so-called “ dystopia beat.
” “ Reporters covering tomorrow ’ s white @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m absolutely begging you : Verify information before you send it out tomorrow , even if it ’ s a very sensational rumor you heard from a cop , ” Collins wrote in his since-deleted tweet .
“ Don ’ t become a hero in neo-Nazi propaganda circles with made-up stuff.
” Then of course , reality set in .
All of those armed citizens tend to keep violence at bay .
The quote from engineer and author Robert A. Heinlein being most appropriate here : Then all the video showed that despite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cross section of pro-liberty America with one video quickly going viral : There are reports that the authoritarians are panicking over the loss of support by certain groups .
Hence the reason they ironically labeling that which has resisted racism as racism .
Perhaps because that is their go-to accusation for anything that is in opposition to their tyranny .
Liberty control is a form of oppression and originally based in racism .
The fact that thousands from a cross-section of our society turned out for the support of liberty will panic the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ usual media narrative has failed .
But because they falsely think that we don ’ t really care about our unalienable human rights , they have chosen poorly on that score .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
We were told that a bunch of pro-liberty patriots getting together with guns *gasp!* would surely lead to violence. We were told that it was going to be a ‘white nationalist rally in Virginia’. That nothing good can ever come from people defending their unalienable human rights.
Then wouldn’t you know it, practical reality intercedes to decimate their pre-written story. First, there was the condemnation of a ‘journalist’ from NBC that couldn’t resist in pushing the ‘white supremacist’ false narrative to the limit. As reported by Fox news: NBC News’ Ben Collins slammed for warning of ‘white nationalist rally in Virginia’:
Ahead of Monday’s gun-rights rally in Virginia, NBC News reporter Ben Collins labeled the event a “white nationalist” gathering Sunday, even as he warned against spreading “made-up stuff” on Twitter — prompting scores of critics to point out the apparent irony, and to condemn his network for sanctioning Collins’ checkered reporting on the so-called “dystopia beat.” “Reporters covering tomorrow’s white nationalist rally in Virginia, I’m absolutely begging you: Verify information before you send it out tomorrow, even if it’s a very sensational rumor you heard from a cop,” Collins wrote in his since-deleted tweet. “Don’t become a hero in neo-Nazi propaganda circles with made-up stuff.”
Then of course, reality set in. All of those armed citizens tend to keep violence at bay. The quote from engineer and author Robert A. Heinlein being most appropriate here:
“An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.” Robert A. Heinlein
Then all the video showed that despite the narrative, it was a nice cross section of pro-liberty America with one video quickly going viral:
“Sir, are you a White Supremacist?” pic.twitter.com/JFhxLRfgv1 — Zach Vorhies (@Perpetualmaniac) January 20, 2020
There are reports that the authoritarians are panicking over the loss of support by certain groups. Hence the reason they ironically labeling that which has resisted racism as racism. Perhaps because that is their go-to accusation for anything that is in opposition to their tyranny.
Liberty control is a form of oppression and originally based in racism. The fact that thousands from a cross-section of our society turned out for the support of liberty will panic the left, and not just because their usual media narrative has failed. But because they falsely think that we don’t really care about our unalienable human rights, they have chosen poorly on that score.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-20--AOC to billionaires: The people ‘don’t want your money, we want your power’

The radical progressive wing of the New Democratic Party truly fails to understand why their ideas are so horrible .
People like Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have this notion that if they could only reach enough people with their extreme message against the rich , they can achieve their goal of complete government control over our lives .
You see , to the far-left , authoritarianism is considered a positive so they can protect us from each other… and ourselves .
It ’ s unfortunate that so many people really are starting to listen to her , Senator Bernie Sanders , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dominated by the upper political classes ( not to be confused with the upper economic classes ) who will make sure we ’ re all comfortable in our morphine-drip existence under Gargantuan Government .
This is why the push so hard for the Green New Deal , known in conservative economic circles as the pathway to Modern Monetary Theory .
But here ’ s the problem .
Okay , so there are a ton of problems with their socialistic agenda , but here ’ s the problem as it pertains to the messaging @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authoritarianism can only be achieved by utilizing “ the people ” within a power structure that only benefits the elite .
You ’ ll notice in her little slip that when she discusses wanting the people to take the power from billionaires like Jeff Bezos , she ’ s framing it within the concept of a “ worker cooperative.
” “ So , I don ’ t want your money as much as we want your power .
The people , not me.
” Therein lies a double-sided sword that few on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ side is the idea that “ I don ’ t want your money , ” as in the people don ’ t want Jeff Bezos ’ money .
This isn ’ t true .
Of course the people want the money .
Wealth redistribution is a foundation of socialism , but she ’ s being honest when she says the people won ’ t get the money .
In her world , it will be the government that gets the money to spend it “ beneficially ” on behalf of the people .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the people to take , is the pathway through which the socialists get the money .
Pushing the people to take the power within a business like Amazon gives them the feeling that they ’ re in control , and to some extent this will be true in the worker cooperative she envisions .
But that control will be within the framework of a greater control mechanism established by government .
Therefore , their control is limited by the shell that they would create .
That ’ s an inadequate breakdown of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but hopefully you can see where they ’ re heading .
In the future , I ’ ll be sure to get more detailed in my analysis .
The saddest part about her statement is that she thought it would be cut , clipped , and taken out of context .
But there ’ s no need .
What she meant by her words within context is actually worse than anything bad video editors could conceive .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
The radical progressive wing of the New Democratic Party truly fails to understand why their ideas are so horrible. People like Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have this notion that if they could only reach enough people with their extreme message against the rich, they can achieve their goal of complete government control over our lives. You see, to the far-left, authoritarianism is considered a positive so they can protect us from each other… and ourselves.
It’s unfortunate that so many people really are starting to listen to her, Senator Bernie Sanders, and other Marxists who envision a utopia dominated by the upper political classes (not to be confused with the upper economic classes) who will make sure we’re all comfortable in our morphine-drip existence under Gargantuan Government. This is why the push so hard for the Green New Deal, known in conservative economic circles as the pathway to Modern Monetary Theory.
But here’s the problem. Okay, so there are a ton of problems with their socialistic agenda, but here’s the problem as it pertains to the messaging depicted in the video below. Their authoritarianism can only be achieved by utilizing “the people” within a power structure that only benefits the elite. You’ll notice in her little slip that when she discusses wanting the people to take the power from billionaires like Jeff Bezos, she’s framing it within the concept of a “worker cooperative.”
AOC says she wants this clip getting out there: pic.twitter.com/qV8sTcxqqM — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) January 20, 2020
“So, I don’t want your money as much as we want your power. The people, not me.”
Therein lies a double-sided sword that few on the left seem to recognize. The first side is the idea that “I don’t want your money,” as in the people don’t want Jeff Bezos’ money. This isn’t true. Of course the people want the money. Wealth redistribution is a foundation of socialism, but she’s being honest when she says the people won’t get the money. In her world, it will be the government that gets the money to spend it “beneficially” on behalf of the people. But the power, which she wants the people to take, is the pathway through which the socialists get the money. Pushing the people to take the power within a business like Amazon gives them the feeling that they’re in control, and to some extent this will be true in the worker cooperative she envisions. But that control will be within the framework of a greater control mechanism established by government. Therefore, their control is limited by the shell that they would create.
That’s an inadequate breakdown of the dynamic envisioned by the Democratic Socialists, but hopefully you can see where they’re heading. In the future, I’ll be sure to get more detailed in my analysis.
The saddest part about her statement is that she thought it would be cut, clipped, and taken out of context. But there’s no need. What she meant by her words within context is actually worse than anything bad video editors could conceive.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-20--Perfect response at Virginia Rally: ‘Mainstream media be damned’

If ever there was a message to be heard about gun control in general and Virginia ’ s proposed draconian laws in particular , it ’ s this one .
An attendee of the Lobby Day rally at the Virginia State Capitol in Richmond explained why he was there and how mainstream media needs to stop spreading a false narrative about gun owners ’ rights activists .
He wasn ’ t happy with Virginia Governor Ralph Northam , either .
When asked what he thought about the Governor sealing up the Capitol , the activist suggested locking him and everyone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not a terrible idea .
As a defense of the 2nd Amendment , this is one of the best messages we ’ ve heard in a while .
But something tells me as more videos from the Virginia Rally emerge , we will hear similar messages of patriotism , equality , and preserving our natural rights .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
If ever there was a message to be heard about gun control in general and Virginia’s proposed draconian laws in particular, it’s this one. An attendee of the Lobby Day rally at the Virginia State Capitol in Richmond explained why he was there and how mainstream media needs to stop spreading a false narrative about gun owners’ rights activists.
Outside the assembly of Virginia pro-2a pic.twitter.com/pLnkJvCl6t — Hunter Johnson (@flop_gen) January 20, 2020
He wasn’t happy with Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, either. When asked what he thought about the Governor sealing up the Capitol, the activist suggested locking him and everyone else in there. It’s not a terrible idea.
As a defense of the 2nd Amendment, this is one of the best messages we’ve heard in a while. But something tells me as more videos from the Virginia Rally emerge, we will hear similar messages of patriotism, equality, and preserving our natural rights.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-20--ZERO arrests: Even CNN admits Ralph Northam’s breathless state of emergency was unnecessary

Leftists across the nation collectively held their breath and prepared for the worst today .
They were certain that if you get a bunch of right-wing 2nd Amendment activists together in the same place , it would devolve into a gigantic drunken fight at a country music bar .
They ’ d be storming the Capitol in search of Democrats to shoot .
They ’ re all domestic terrorists in the eyes of most leftists .
Except… they aren ’ t .
But with about an hour left for the event , there have been no incidents .
Zero .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ CNN that there hasn ’ t been a single arrest made .
Could it be ?
Was the left ’ s narrative wrong ?
Was Virginia Governor Ralph Northam being partisan and paranoid when he declared a state of emergency ?
The answer to all of these questions appears to be “ yes.
” The problem with the left ’ s narrative is they have a vision of gun owners that has been indoctrinated into them by leftist media and a progressive education system .
They can not fathom the concept that law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shoot people .
But their worldview is based on lies , therefore they ’ re unable to compute events like Richmond that do not devolve as they anticipated .
We can expect the media to thank Northam , his state of emergency , and the strong police presence for the lack of violent rioting the left expected .
Even in light of the actual events , they will not budge on their perspectives that everyone at the event is racist .
They ’ re all violent .
They ’ re all in training @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Well , the left can keep their narrative .
We ’ re just thankful to God and the patriots at the event that the proper message was sent .
It ’ s not surprising to conservatives that tens of thousands of patriotic American gun activists gathered for peaceful protest are less harmful than a couple dozen Antifa activists bent on mayhem .
But it ’ s shocking to the left .
Shocking , I tell you .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Leftists across the nation collectively held their breath and prepared for the worst today. They were certain that if you get a bunch of right-wing 2nd Amendment activists together in the same place, it would devolve into a gigantic drunken fight at a country music bar. They’d be storming the Capitol in search of Democrats to shoot. They’re all domestic terrorists in the eyes of most leftists. Except… they aren’t.
CNN: Threats which caused Gov. Northam to call for a State of Emergency "Have simply not emerged".. "The police very clear in saying they have not had a single arrest during this rally and we have been standing here all morning" pic.twitter.com/6p2JfebvFO — Benny (@bennyjohnson) January 20, 2020
Here’s a sampling of the unhinged responses earlier today:
Terrorists in Virginia right now. If you’re in Richmond right now please stay far, far away.
pic.twitter.com/tXlYE04aLN — Joshua Potash (@JoshuaPotash) January 20, 2020
This is directly outside Virginia’s State Capitol building. They want their opposition to be terrified. They’re terrorists. pic.twitter.com/GXl1llqnrA — Joshua Potash (@JoshuaPotash) January 20, 2020
Hundreds of armed domestic terrorists. Six cops total. This is not a "well regulared militia." It's appalling and extremely dangerous. The only reason they are allowed to do this is because they are white.
pic.twitter.com/CVDzVybsBB — Sergio Siano (@siano4progress) January 20, 2020
4/4/19 – FBI Director says white supremacy is a ‘Persistent, Pervasive Threat to the US!
This isn’t about gun rights!
On MLK Day to boot.
Make no mistake, these people are racist domestic terrorists!#RichmondVA pic.twitter.com/xP3fq07vxn — Tris Resists (@TrisResists) January 20, 2020
But with about an hour left for the event, there have been no violent incidents. Zero. Richmond police made it crystal clear to CNN that there hasn’t been a single arrest made for violence. One woman was arrested for allegedly not removing her bandanna, defying an anti-mask law. Could it be? Was the left’s narrative wrong? Was Virginia Governor Ralph Northam being partisan and paranoid when he declared a state of emergency? The answer to all of these questions appears to be “yes.”
The problem with the left’s narrative is they have a vision of gun owners that has been indoctrinated into them by leftist media and a progressive education system. They cannot fathom the concept that law abiding gun owners do not want to shoot people. But their worldview is based on lies, therefore they’re unable to compute events like Richmond that do not devolve as they anticipated.
We can expect the media to thank Northam, his state of emergency, and the strong police presence for the lack of violent rioting the left expected. Even in light of the actual events, they will not budge on their perspectives that everyone at the event is racist. They’re all violent. They’re all in training to be the next mass shooter. Well, the left can keep their narrative. We’re just thankful to God and the patriots at the event that the proper message was sent.
It’s not surprising to conservatives that tens of thousands of patriotic American gun activists gathered for peaceful protest are less harmful than a couple dozen Antifa activists bent on mayhem. But it’s shocking to the left. Shocking, I tell you.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-20--When MLK Jr. accepted a Planned Parenthood award, they were still publicly against abortion

Here ’ s a bit of a history lesson .
Planned Parenthood ’ s initial goal , at least publicly and politically , was to promote birth control .
They expressed opposition to abortion until the 1970s , even handing out pamphlets that warned against women attempting to have abortions .
“ Is birth control abortion ?
Definitely not .
An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun .
It is dangerous to your life and health .
It may make you sterile so that when you want a child you can not have it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ life.
” ( Is Birth Control Abortion , Planned Parenthood pamphlet , Aug. 1963 , p.1 ) This is extremely important to understand because there ’ s a perennial disinformation campaign that happens on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day that highlights the fact that Dr. King accepted the Margaret Sanger Award in 1966 from Planned Parenthood .
They use this as “ evidence ” that Dr. King supported their mission , and technically he did .
But what they never mention is that the mission he supported was for birth control and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the time he accepted his award , Planned Parenthood had not performed a single abortion , at least none acknowledged to the public .
Historians believe based on public and private engagements with Dr. King that he was adamantly pro-life but very supportive of birth control .
He condemned abortion as genocide against his people in multiple public speeches ; African-Americans have always held the lion ’ s share of abortions even before it was legalized by Roe v. Wade .
He felt that birth control was a better solution , preventing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ predication of conception .
Does this mean Planned Parenthood was pro-life at any point ?
No .
It is widely believed that their objections to abortion were used as political ploys to help them promote their birth control agenda .
The very foundation of the organization by Sanger and her cohorts was to legalize birth control in an effort to reduce population growth by African-American .
As LifeNews noted in 2011 : Planned Parenthood used Dr. King in order to promote birth-control ; a practice he would have vehemently agreed with .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Dr. King to promote abortion ; a practice which he vehemently disagreed with .
“ The mass of Negroes , particularly in the South , still breed carelessly and disastrously , with the result that the increase among Negroes , even more than among Whites , is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit .
“ The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal .
We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the Minister @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
” ( Black Pro-Lifers March , Protest Racist Nature of Planned Parenthood and Abortion , p.1 online ) Do not let Planned Parenthood tarnish the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. by association .
He was pro-life and when he accepted their award , they were not committing abortions .
He and they promoted birth control at the time , nothing more .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Here’s a bit of a history lesson. Planned Parenthood’s initial goal, at least publicly and politically, was to promote birth control. They expressed opposition to abortion until the 1970s, even handing out pamphlets that warned against women attempting to have abortions.
“Is birth control abortion? Definitely not. An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun. It is dangerous to your life and health. It may make you sterile so that when you want a child you cannot have it. Birth control merely post-pones the beginning of life.” (Is Birth Control Abortion, Planned Parenthood pamphlet, Aug. 1963, p.1)
This is extremely important to understand because there’s a perennial disinformation campaign that happens on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day that highlights the fact that Dr. King accepted the Margaret Sanger Award in 1966 from Planned Parenthood. They use this as “evidence” that Dr. King supported their mission, and technically he did. But what they never mention is that the mission he supported was for birth control and not for abortion. In fact, at the time he accepted his award, Planned Parenthood had not performed a single abortion, at least none acknowledged to the public.
Historians believe based on public and private engagements with Dr. King that he was adamantly pro-life but very supportive of birth control. He condemned abortion as genocide against his people in multiple public speeches; African-Americans have always held the lion’s share of abortions even before it was legalized by Roe v. Wade. He felt that birth control was a better solution, preventing the murder of abortion by reducing its predication of conception.
Does this mean Planned Parenthood was pro-life at any point? No. It is widely believed that their objections to abortion were used as political ploys to help them promote their birth control agenda. The very foundation of the organization by Sanger and her cohorts was to legalize birth control in an effort to reduce population growth by African-American. As LifeNews noted in 2011:
Planned Parenthood used Dr. King in order to promote birth-control; a practice he would have vehemently agreed with. But today, pro-Choice advocates use the memory of Dr. King to promote abortion; a practice which he vehemently disagreed with. “The mass of Negroes, particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among Whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit. “The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the Minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” (Black Pro-Lifers March, Protest Racist Nature of Planned Parenthood and Abortion, p.1 online)
Do not let Planned Parenthood tarnish the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. by association. He was pro-life and when he accepted their award, they were not committing abortions. He and they promoted birth control at the time, nothing more.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-20--MLK’s mission praised by black conservatives

Washington , D.C. – In observance of the upcoming holiday devoted to the life and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King , Jr. , members of the Project 21 black leadership network are available for interviews regarding Dr. King , how his teachings have shaped the nation and how people have acted – positively and negatively – in his name .
“ Dr .
King ’ s embodiment of bravery , courage and unity remains a call to action in our neighborhoods and communities .
We must continue to reference his life as a catalyst for racial harmony and justice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
“ We ’ ve come a long way since Dr. King imparted his dream to the world , and it is still incumbent upon us to continue making that dream a reality.
” Project 21 members criticized leftists who have misinterpreted or co-opted Dr. King ’ s inclusive and colorblind ideas to advance their political agenda .
“ Dr .
Martin Luther King , Jr. ’ s powerful messages continue to offer us deep insights and wisdom about the ideals we should strive for as we grapple with complex issues like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Project 21 member Dr. Carol Swain .
“ While speaking at Southern Methodist University on March 17 , 1966 , Dr. King rejected communism ’ s end-justifies-the-means approach for addressing inequalities .
‘ Destructive means , ’ King said , ‘ can not bring about constructive ends.
’ If only we would apply Dr. King ’ s wisdom to current day problems.
” “ As we reflect on the work of Dr. King , we can not ignore the ‘ I have a dream ’ portion of his famous March on Washington speech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Black Lives Matter organizations of this world have ignored it as they invoke Dr. King ’ s words to promote racial division – as if we have yet to move on from the segregation of the day , ” added Project 21 member Melanie Collette .
“ Dr .
King ’ s message was that of unity , not to separate ourselves from each other .
In the same speech , Dr. King encouraged us not to allow our fight to ‘ lead us to distrust all white people.
’ Instead , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brothers ‘ realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny… their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom . '
” “ As we celebrate the life and accomplishments of Dr. Martin Luther King , Jr. , I am convinced he would look favorably on the gains made by black Americans during the Trump Administration , ” said Project 21 member Donna Jackson .
“ Today , we have record-low unemployment , prison reform , greater faith-based outreach and permanent funding for historically black colleges and universities .
Dr. King was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social advancement of black people .
These goals are now being realized.
” Dr. King was born on January 15 , 1929 .
The federal holiday created for him that commemorates his birthday falls under the “ Uniform Monday Holiday Act , ” which sets the observance for the third Monday of every January .
It was created in 1983 .
At the ceremony where the bill designating the holiday was signed into law , President Ronald Reagan said Dr. King “ stirred our nation to the very depths of its soul.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Better Deal for Black America ” to help remove the remaining barriers to empowerment and ensure equal opportunity for black Americans to attain the American Dream .
The Blueprint ’ s 57 policy recommendations address issues including police-community relations , employment , immigration , education and revitalizing the black church .
A second edition containing dozens of new recommendations is currently in development and will be released later this year .
To schedule an interview with a member of Project 21 about this issue , contact Judy Kent at ( 703 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voice of black conservatives for over 25 years , is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research .
Its members have been quoted , interviewed or published over 40,000 times since the program was created in 1992 .
Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated , and may be earmarked exclusively for the use of Project 21 .
Founded in 1982 , the National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan , free-market , independent conservative think-tank .
Ninety-four percent of its support comes from some 60,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foundations and less than two percent from corporations .
Sign up for email updates here .
Follow Project 21 on Twitter at @ Project21News for general announcements .
To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by Project 21 members , follow our media appearances Twitter account at @ NCPPRMedia .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short @ @ @ @ @ @ @ please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Washington, D.C. – In observance of the upcoming holiday devoted to the life and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., members of the Project 21 black leadership network are available for interviews regarding Dr. King, how his teachings have shaped the nation and how people have acted – positively and negatively – in his name.
“Dr. King’s embodiment of bravery, courage and unity remains a call to action in our neighborhoods and communities. We must continue to reference his life as a catalyst for racial harmony and justice,” Project 21 member Demetrius Minor said. “We’ve come a long way since Dr. King imparted his dream to the world, and it is still incumbent upon us to continue making that dream a reality.”
Project 21 members criticized leftists who have misinterpreted or co-opted Dr. King’s inclusive and colorblind ideas to advance their political agenda.
“Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s powerful messages continue to offer us deep insights and wisdom about the ideals we should strive for as we grapple with complex issues like race and social class,” said Project 21 member Dr. Carol Swain. “While speaking at Southern Methodist University on March 17, 1966, Dr. King rejected communism’s end-justifies-the-means approach for addressing inequalities. ‘Destructive means,’ King said, ‘cannot bring about constructive ends.’ If only we would apply Dr. King’s wisdom to current day problems.”
“As we reflect on the work of Dr. King, we cannot ignore the ‘I have a dream’ portion of his famous March on Washington speech. Sadly, the Colin Kaepernicks and Black Lives Matter organizations of this world have ignored it as they invoke Dr. King’s words to promote racial division – as if we have yet to move on from the segregation of the day,” added Project 21 member Melanie Collette. “Dr. King’s message was that of unity, not to separate ourselves from each other. In the same speech, Dr. King encouraged us not to allow our fight to ‘lead us to distrust all white people.’ Instead, he wanted us to understand that our white brothers ‘realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny… their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom.'”
“As we celebrate the life and accomplishments of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I am convinced he would look favorably on the gains made by black Americans during the Trump Administration,” said Project 21 member Donna Jackson. “Today, we have record-low unemployment, prison reform, greater faith-based outreach and permanent funding for historically black colleges and universities. Dr. King was a strong advocate for the economic and social advancement of black people. These goals are now being realized.”
Dr. King was born on January 15, 1929. The federal holiday created for him that commemorates his birthday falls under the “Uniform Monday Holiday Act,” which sets the observance for the third Monday of every January. It was created in 1983. At the ceremony where the bill designating the holiday was signed into law, President Ronald Reagan said Dr. King “stirred our nation to the very depths of its soul.”
Project 21 created the “Blueprint for a Better Deal for Black America” to help remove the remaining barriers to empowerment and ensure equal opportunity for black Americans to attain the American Dream. The Blueprint’s 57 policy recommendations address issues including police-community relations, employment, immigration, education and revitalizing the black church. A second edition containing dozens of new recommendations is currently in development and will be released later this year.
To schedule an interview with a member of Project 21 about this issue, contact Judy Kent at (703) 759-0269.
Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives for over 25 years, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research. Its members have been quoted, interviewed or published over 40,000 times since the program was created in 1992. Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated, and may be earmarked exclusively for the use of Project 21.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
Founded in 1982, the National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from some 60,000 individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations. Sign up for email updates here.
Follow Project 21 on Twitter at @Project21News for general announcements. To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by Project 21 members, follow our media appearances Twitter account at @NCPPRMedia.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]