noqreport--2020-04-16--How Mindy Robinson is trying to save America

Acutely intelligent .
Extremely passionate .
Patriotic through and through .
Republican candidate for Nevada ’ s 3rd Congressional District Mindy Robinson has what it takes to get the House of Representatives back on track .
Will she be able to translate her national fame into localized votes ?
We ’ ll find out on June 9th unless further complications with the coronavirus and mail-in voting cause turmoil .
The district she hopes to represent has traditionally been one of the most red in the state with Joe Heck winning it by over 24-points in 2014 .
But when Heck @ @ @ @ @ @ @ run for Senate in 2016 , Democrats were able to turn the district blue and keep it blue in 2018 .
Now , Robinson has plans to turn it red again , but she ’ ll have to overcome her less-conservative Republican competitors first .
Robinson will be speaking this Saturday at the first digital “ Saving America Conference.
” She gave us a preview of her style and topics on “ Conversations with Jeff.
” Her grasp of the issues and the passion behind her goals were on full display in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her district , state , and nation need in order to fight the scourge of authoritarianism wrapping its tentacles around our freedoms .
But there ’ s something bigger that Robinson represents that was clear in her interview with Jeff Dornik .
She isn ’ t a lifetime politician with wild ambitions of joining the DC Country Club .
She walked a different path her whole life , a path that included two college degrees , Hollywood movies , and taking on criminals on Twitter .
It was the realization that Democrats were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ district weren ’ t doing enough to fight them that prompted her to make this run for Congress .
America needs more of this .
We need people who are motivated by public service rather than personal ambition to take on the political elites .
This is one of the reasons I ’ m a staunch conservative but also an Independent .
Partisanship must not supersede ideology , and while I invariably support Republicans over Democrats , I do so selectively .
There are many Republican lawmakers who do not deserve support , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them .
I endorse her enthusiastically .
The time for lifetime politicians to decree their will on the people must come to an end .
True patriots like Mindy Robinson doing their civic duty and running for public office should be the new normal .
This Conversation with Jeff is a must-watch .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
The coronavirus crisis has prompted many , even some conservatives , to promote authoritarianism .
It ’ s understandable to some extent now , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ embed itself in American life .
We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Acutely intelligent. Extremely passionate. Patriotic through and through. Republican candidate for Nevada’s 3rd Congressional District Mindy Robinson has what it takes to get the House of Representatives back on track. Will she be able to translate her national fame into localized votes? We’ll find out on June 9th unless further complications with the coronavirus and mail-in voting cause turmoil.
The district she hopes to represent has traditionally been one of the most red in the state with Joe Heck winning it by over 24-points in 2014. But when Heck vacated his seat to mount an unsuccessful run for Senate in 2016, Democrats were able to turn the district blue and keep it blue in 2018. Now, Robinson has plans to turn it red again, but she’ll have to overcome her less-conservative Republican competitors first.
Robinson will be speaking this Saturday at the first digital “Saving America Conference.” She gave us a preview of her style and topics on “Conversations with Jeff.” Her grasp of the issues and the passion behind her goals were on full display in this hour-long podcast. She clearly knows what her district, state, and nation need in order to fight the scourge of authoritarianism wrapping its tentacles around our freedoms.
But there’s something bigger that Robinson represents that was clear in her interview with Jeff Dornik. She isn’t a lifetime politician with wild ambitions of joining the DC Country Club. She walked a different path her whole life, a path that included two college degrees, Hollywood movies, and taking on criminals on Twitter. It was the realization that Democrats were destroying America and Republican lawmakers in her district weren’t doing enough to fight them that prompted her to make this run for Congress.
America needs more of this. We need people who are motivated by public service rather than personal ambition to take on the political elites. This is one of the reasons I’m a staunch conservative but also an Independent. Partisanship must not supersede ideology, and while I invariably support Republicans over Democrats, I do so selectively. There are many Republican lawmakers who do not deserve support, but Robinson isn’t one of them. I endorse her enthusiastically.
The time for lifetime politicians to decree their will on the people must come to an end. True patriots like Mindy Robinson doing their civic duty and running for public office should be the new normal. This Conversation with Jeff is a must-watch.
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-04-16--Nancy Pelosi gloats to James Corden about ice cream stockpiles as millions of Americans suffer

Millions of Americans are struggling to put food on the table as most of the U.S. economy has been shut down by the coronavirus crisis .
But that fact hasn ’ t quite registered with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi who used her time on The Late Late Show with James Corden to gloat about her stockpiles of chocolate and ice cream .
Under normal circumstances , highlighting someone ’ s “ privilege ” is not something we would do .
People who earn or otherwise acquire wealth are free to do so in our American capitalistic system .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s sheltered life was poorly timed and ill-advised .
Most Americans aren ’ t interested in seeing how well politicians are living through the coronavirus crisis .
They ’ re interested in how they can get back to work , start earning money again , and doing the things that will allow them to buy ice cream or anything else for their families .
What makes this tasteless display even more infuriating is that Pelosi spends every day pointing out how badly President Trump is handling the crisis .
While he does everything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get us through this horrible situation , Pelosi brags about obstructing measures by the White House to address the situation .
Some will argue that we need hope and levity at times like these is beneficial .
This is true .
But levity coming from someone who seems opposed to finding solutions is not what the psychologist ordered .
Pelosi should have known better than to demonstrate how her blessings are so much greater than millions of Americans who are struggling .
As The Gateway Pundit noted , it ’ s like she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eat cake.
” It ’ s often said that Democratic leadership is tone-deaf to the conditions of average Americans .
Nancy Pelosi demonstrated that clearly with her jovial display of food stores on James Corden ’ s show .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
The coronavirus crisis has prompted many , even some conservatives , to promote authoritarianism .
It ’ s understandable to some extent now , but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Millions of Americans are struggling to put food on the table as most of the U.S. economy has been shut down by the coronavirus crisis. But that fact hasn’t quite registered with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi who used her time on The Late Late Show with James Corden to gloat about her stockpiles of chocolate and ice cream.
Under normal circumstances, highlighting someone’s “privilege” is not something we would do. People who earn or otherwise acquire wealth are free to do so in our American capitalistic system. But this particular display of Pelosi’s sheltered life was poorly timed and ill-advised. Most Americans aren’t interested in seeing how well politicians are living through the coronavirus crisis. They’re interested in how they can get back to work, start earning money again, and doing the things that will allow them to buy ice cream or anything else for their families.
Name something worse than this. You can’t. pic.twitter.com/H5ovGuE74V — Dave Rubin (@RubinReport) April 16, 2020
What makes this tasteless display even more infuriating is that Pelosi spends every day pointing out how badly President Trump is handling the crisis. While he does everything he and his staff can do to get us through this horrible situation, Pelosi brags about obstructing measures by the White House to address the situation.
Some will argue that we need hope and levity at times like these is beneficial. This is true. But levity coming from someone who seems opposed to finding solutions is not what the psychologist ordered. Pelosi should have known better than to demonstrate how her blessings are so much greater than millions of Americans who are struggling. As The Gateway Pundit noted, it’s like she’s saying, “Let them eat cake.”
It’s often said that Democratic leadership is tone-deaf to the conditions of average Americans. Nancy Pelosi demonstrated that clearly with her jovial display of food stores on James Corden’s show.
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-04-16--Knesset has three weeks to pick a Prime Minister or a fourth Israeli election is coming

Blue and White leader Benny Gantz failed to form an emergency government for Israel despite an extended deadline to do so .
As midnight struck on Wednesday , President Reuven Rivlin officially pulled the mandate he had given Gantz to pull 61 MKs together , prompting a three-week period in which anyone in the Knesset could make an attempt to get a majority .
But this is really just an unofficial extension for Gantz and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hammer out an emergency government plan .
The two have claimed to be close to a deal for several days @ @ @ @ @ @ @ largest parties and allow a rotation in the Prime Minister ’ s office .
Two of the final points of contention that remains unresolved is a proposal that would allow an indicted leader to be Prime Minister and control over judicial appointments .
Netanyahu was indicted last November on corruption charges .
To get to this point , Gantz had split from some of his center-left coalition members to try to work with Netanyahu .
It cost him dearly as Blue and White is now splintered , but joining with the conservative bloc @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seemed to be the only viable option .
Gantz claimed the coronavirus crisis prompted him to make the move , but leftist MKs considered it a huge betrayal .
The call by Rivlin for the Knesset to deliver a majority mandate doesn ’ t change much in the current dynamic .
Netanyahu and Gantz are still the players holding most of the cards .
If they can hammer out deal that doesn ’ t cause more defections from either side , they still have an opportunity to avoid a fourth election in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can not , current polling shows Likud would likely gain a few seats while the splintered Blue and White would plummet , perhaps even below their current status as the second biggest party .
“ I hope that the Knesset members will be able to form a majority in such a way that a government can be formed as soon as possible , to prevent a fourth round of elections , ” Rivlin wrote in his formal withdrawal of the Gantz mandate .
Without the coronavirus crisis , an unprecedented fourth election would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presence of the coronavirus means election results will be unpredictable at best .
The vast majority of Israelis want a resolution now .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
The coronavirus crisis has prompted many , even some conservatives , to promote authoritarianism .
It ’ s understandable to some extent now , but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life .
We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Blue and White leader Benny Gantz failed to form an emergency government for Israel despite an extended deadline to do so. As midnight struck on Wednesday, President Reuven Rivlin officially pulled the mandate he had given Gantz to pull 61 MKs together, prompting a three-week period in which anyone in the Knesset could make an attempt to get a majority.
But this is really just an unofficial extension for Gantz and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hammer out an emergency government plan. The two have claimed to be close to a deal for several days, one that would unite the two largest parties and allow a rotation in the Prime Minister’s office. Two of the final points of contention that remains unresolved is a proposal that would allow an indicted leader to be Prime Minister and control over judicial appointments. Netanyahu was indicted last November on corruption charges.
To get to this point, Gantz had split from some of his center-left coalition members to try to work with Netanyahu. It cost him dearly as Blue and White is now splintered, but joining with the conservative bloc led by Netanyahu’s Likud Party seemed to be the only viable option. Gantz claimed the coronavirus crisis prompted him to make the move, but leftist MKs considered it a huge betrayal.
The call by Rivlin for the Knesset to deliver a majority mandate doesn’t change much in the current dynamic. Netanyahu and Gantz are still the players holding most of the cards. If they can hammer out deal that doesn’t cause more defections from either side, they still have an opportunity to avoid a fourth election in a little over a year. If they cannot, current polling shows Likud would likely gain a few seats while the splintered Blue and White would plummet, perhaps even below their current status as the second biggest party.
“I hope that the Knesset members will be able to form a majority in such a way that a government can be formed as soon as possible, to prevent a fourth round of elections,” Rivlin wrote in his formal withdrawal of the Gantz mandate.
Without the coronavirus crisis, an unprecedented fourth election would have been extremely unpopular. But the presence of the coronavirus means election results will be unpredictable at best. The vast majority of Israelis want a resolution now.
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-04-16--Fox News claims coronavirus leaked from Wuhan lab, not wet market (as Glenn Beck reported last week)

The coronavirus that has spread as a pandemic around the world—infecting at least two million people and killing over 133,000 so far—was accidentally leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab and not from a nearby wet market , as the Chinese Communist Party has claimed from the beginning .
A report citing multiple sources by Fox News shows confidence is high among experts that the CCP ’ s official story is false… and arguably the most expensive cover up of all time .
Documents detail early efforts by doctors at the lab and early efforts at containment .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possible point of origin never sold bats , and the sources tell Fox News that blaming the wet market was an effort by China to deflect blame from the laboratory , along with the country ’ s propaganda efforts targeting the U.S. and Italy .
Though the report is being treated as “ breaking ” and labeled by Fox News as “ exclusive , ” it has been widely covered by independent media sources for a while .
Last week , Glenn Beck released essentially the same evidence , going further to demonstrate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sold at the wet market .
His comprehensive video on the matter garnered a respectable 92,000 views so far , but did not get picked up by mainstream media .
Others in independent media have been ringing the same bell as well .
The official story from the CCP that has been echoed by the World Health Organization ( WHO ) has had holes in it from the start .
Now , questions are emerging about what repercussions should be levied on China for not stopping the spread of the deadly disease when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ China has so much influence over American mainstream media that it ’ s certain there will be major debunking and propaganda efforts used against the story .
But the facts are crystal clear .
Even without the expert sources for Fox News and Glenn Beck , common sense should tell us that a viral research lab which was warned about by the U.S. Embassy in 2018 is the most likely source of the disease instead of a wet market in which the bats were not even sold .
The WHO is already facing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his administration will be defunding the WHO until the results of an investigation into how they failed so miserably at their primary job .
The Fox News report is being widely covered by conservative and even some mainstream media outlets .
Of course , Glenn Beck made the same report a week ago , but mainstream media refused to pick it up .
At least now the truth is getting out .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
The coronavirus crisis has prompted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ promote authoritarianism .
It ’ s understandable to some extent now , but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life .
We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
The coronavirus that has spread as a pandemic around the world—infecting at least two million people and killing over 133,000 so far—was accidentally leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab and not from a nearby wet market, as the Chinese Communist Party has claimed from the beginning. A report citing multiple sources by Fox News shows confidence is high among experts that the CCP’s official story is false… and arguably the most expensive cover up of all time.
Documents detail early efforts by doctors at the lab and early efforts at containment. The Wuhan wet market initially identified as a possible point of origin never sold bats, and the sources tell Fox News that blaming the wet market was an effort by China to deflect blame from the laboratory, along with the country’s propaganda efforts targeting the U.S. and Italy.
Though the report is being treated as “breaking” and labeled by Fox News as “exclusive,” it has been widely covered by independent media sources for a while. Last week, Glenn Beck released essentially the same evidence, going further to demonstrate that bats are not and were never sold at the wet market. His comprehensive video on the matter garnered a respectable 92,000 views so far, but did not get picked up by mainstream media.
Others in independent media have been ringing the same bell as well. The official story from the CCP that has been echoed by the World Health Organization (WHO) has had holes in it from the start. Now, questions are emerging about what repercussions should be levied on China for not stopping the spread of the deadly disease when they had the chance.
Unfortunately, China has so much influence over American mainstream media that it’s certain there will be major debunking and propaganda efforts used against the story. But the facts are crystal clear. Even without the expert sources for Fox News and Glenn Beck, common sense should tell us that a viral research lab which was warned about by the U.S. Embassy in 2018 is the most likely source of the disease instead of a wet market in which the bats were not even sold.
U.S. Embassy officials warned in January 2018 about inadequate safety at the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab and passed on information about scientists conducting risky research on coronavirus from bats, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.
The WHO is already facing challenges after President Trump announced yesterday that his administration will be defunding the WHO until the results of an investigation into how they failed so miserably at their primary job.
The Fox News report is being widely covered by conservative and even some mainstream media outlets. Of course, Glenn Beck made the same report a week ago, but mainstream media refused to pick it up. At least now the truth is getting out.
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-07--Mark Meadows reminds Nancy Pelosi she’s a hypocrite

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has two different sets of rules when it comes to foreign affairs .
She has the Democratic President rules and the Republican President rules .
Or , to be more specific , she has the Obama-Free-Pass rule book that states whatever President Obama did with foreign countries , whether sending Iran pallets of money or engaging in a mini-war in Libya , it ’ s A-okay with her regardless of the consequences .
The other rule book is the Trump-Obstruction-Plan with which she objects to anything President Trump does regardless of the benefits to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ instances in which this is more clear than comparing her actions when President Obama was bombing Syria repeatedly versus when President Trump launched one targeted airstrike that took out Qasem Soleimani .
While President Obama was mucking up the Middle East a dozen airstrikes at a time , President Trump made the Middle East a safer place by taking out the preeminent terrorist leader of the day .
Representative Mark Meadows made sure she ( and everyone else ) was aware of her partisan hypocrisy on Twitter .
Let ’ s call it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was in the White House and ordered an airstrike to take out Soleimani , Pelosi and Democrats would be cheering .
And just like with Osama bin Laden ’ s death , Republicans would be cheering with them .
It ’ s called patriotism .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has two different sets of rules when it comes to foreign affairs. She has the Democratic President rules and the Republican President rules. Or, to be more specific, she has the Obama-Free-Pass rule book that states whatever President Obama did with foreign countries, whether sending Iran pallets of money or engaging in a mini-war in Libya, it’s A-okay with her regardless of the consequences. The other rule book is the Trump-Obstruction-Plan with which she objects to anything President Trump does regardless of the benefits to the American people.
There are no instances in which this is more clear than comparing her actions when President Obama was bombing Syria repeatedly versus when President Trump launched one targeted airstrike that took out Qasem Soleimani. While President Obama was mucking up the Middle East a dozen airstrikes at a time, President Trump made the Middle East a safer place by taking out the preeminent terrorist leader of the day. Representative Mark Meadows made sure she (and everyone else) was aware of her partisan hypocrisy on Twitter.
President Obama’s administration frequently conducted air strikes in Syria. Pelosi was silent. No calls for “Congressional authorization.” The feigned, hypocritical outrage you’re seeing from Democrats now is because a Republican is in the White House. @realDonaldTrump — Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) January 7, 2020
Let’s call it like it is. If Hillary Clinton was in the White House and ordered an airstrike to take out Soleimani, Pelosi and Democrats would be cheering. And just like with Osama bin Laden’s death, Republicans would be cheering with them. It’s called patriotism.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-07--Grassroots failure: 99.5% of money raised by March For Our Lives came from big donors

The groundswell of financial support for gun control group March For Our Lives has been called a mandate from the people for lawmakers to take action immediately .
They raised $ 17,879,150 in their first year after launching in the wake of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting when a former student , Nikolas Cruz , killed 17 people and injured 17 others .
But there ’ s a problem with this so-called groundswell .
It ’ s not an indicator of masses of people giving their hard-earned money in support of a worthy cause .
It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are using the group ’ s 501 ( C ) ( 4 ) status to keep their huge donations private .
A report by the Washington Free Beacon reveals that of the money raised that year , $ 16,922,331 was collected through 36 donations ranging from $ 100,000 and $ 3,504,717 .
On top of the donations from the wealthy , there were more “ modest ” donations between $ 5,000 and $ 100,000 from 38 donations , making up the bulk of the remaining 5 % .
How much was donated by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than $ 5000 ?
A grand total of $ 80,705 .
March For Our Lives Raised Nearly All Funding from Secret Six-Figure Donations While March For Our Lives is not required to disclose its donors under federal law , some businessmen and Hollywood celebrities vowed to provide generous contributions for the group ’ s 2018 march on Washington , D.C. Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff and billionaire businessman Eli Broad both gave $ 1,000,000 , two of six donors to do so .
George Clooney and wife Amal Clooney gave $ 500,000 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group ’ s spending went primarily toward its March 24 , 2018 march on Washington , D.C. , which garnered several hundred thousand attendees and featured speakers pushing for new gun bans and magazine limits .
The event cemented March For Our Lives as one of the most prominent and radical gun-control groups in the country .
The group has since called for confiscating up to 117 million firearms from Americans as part of its highly-publicized “ A Peace Plan for a Safer America.
” This is clearly not a “ groundswell ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be seen as a “ mandate ” for gun control .
This is rich activists like Mike Bloomberg and George Soros and their cronies attempting to inflate the potency of the gun control narrative so Americans will be mislead into believing there ’ s a consensus .
As we learned during the Virginia election last year , such messaging does have an effect when it has enough money behind it .
Huge amounts of outside money , especially supporting gun control , was flooded into Virginia to help flip the legislature from red @ @ @ @ @ @ @ faced with a gun control crisis that has become the bellwether for gun control across the nation .
Narrative-control is the best ( and arguably only ) weapon the left has in its armory when it comes to divisive issues like gun control .
They utilize emotion and knee-jerk reactions to tragedies to push their point forward .
This in itself should be seen as unambiguously despicable ; they see every shooting in America as an opportunity to spring to action .
Well , not every shooting .
It ’ s conspicuous that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ended when a “ good guy with a gun ” took down the shooter faded almost instantly from the news cycle .
Meanwhile , other similar situations that were not contained by an armed bystander get wall-to-wall coverage on the networks .
This is also the reason that gun control advocates do not react to shootings in places like Chicago where gun control keeps law abiding citizens unarmed .
Criminals bypass those laws as criminals are wont to do .
There were 515 homicides in Chicago in 2019 , which is thankfully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But it ’ s still much higher than in places where gun control is less of an issue .
Utah , a state with more people than Chicago and much looser gun laws , had 80 homicides in 2019 .
These are the types of narratives the organizers and mega-donor supporters of March For Our Lives do not want you to hear .
The nation ’ s gun control agenda is not being driven by a groundswell of grassroots activists .
The millions of dollars they are collecting mostly come from rich radical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disarmed .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
The groundswell of financial support for gun control group March For Our Lives has been called a mandate from the people for lawmakers to take action immediately. They raised $17,879,150 in their first year after launching in the wake of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting when a former student, Nikolas Cruz, killed 17 people and injured 17 others. But there’s a problem with this so-called groundswell. It’s not an indicator of masses of people giving their hard-earned money in support of a worthy cause. It’s a political ploy by progressive elites who are using the group’s 501(C)(4) status to keep their huge donations private.
A report by the Washington Free Beacon reveals that of the money raised that year, $16,922,331 was collected through 36 donations ranging from $100,000 and $3,504,717. On top of the donations from the wealthy, there were more “modest” donations between $5,000 and $100,000 from 38 donations, making up the bulk of the remaining 5%. How much was donated by the grassroots who couldn’t contribute more than $5000? A grand total of $80,705.
March For Our Lives Raised Nearly All Funding from Secret Six-Figure Donations While March For Our Lives is not required to disclose its donors under federal law, some businessmen and Hollywood celebrities vowed to provide generous contributions for the group’s 2018 march on Washington, D.C. Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff and billionaire businessman Eli Broad both gave $1,000,000, two of six donors to do so. George Clooney and wife Amal Clooney gave $500,000, as did fashion company Gucci. The group’s spending went primarily toward its March 24, 2018 march on Washington, D.C., which garnered several hundred thousand attendees and featured speakers pushing for new gun bans and magazine limits. The event cemented March For Our Lives as one of the most prominent and radical gun-control groups in the country. The group has since called for confiscating up to 117 million firearms from Americans as part of its highly-publicized “A Peace Plan for a Safer America.”
This is clearly not a “groundswell” of “grassroots” support that should be seen as a “mandate” for gun control. This is rich activists like Mike Bloomberg and George Soros and their cronies attempting to inflate the potency of the gun control narrative so Americans will be mislead into believing there’s a consensus. As we learned during the Virginia election last year, such messaging does have an effect when it has enough money behind it. Huge amounts of outside money, especially supporting gun control, was flooded into Virginia to help flip the legislature from red to blue. Now, Virginia is faced with a gun control crisis that has become the bellwether for gun control across the nation.
Narrative-control is the best (and arguably only) weapon the left has in its armory when it comes to divisive issues like gun control. They utilize emotion and knee-jerk reactions to tragedies to push their point forward. This in itself should be seen as unambiguously despicable; they see every shooting in America as an opportunity to spring to action. Well, not every shooting. It’s conspicuous that the story of the Texas church shooting that ended when a “good guy with a gun” took down the shooter faded almost instantly from the news cycle. Meanwhile, other similar situations that were not contained by an armed bystander get wall-to-wall coverage on the networks.
This is also the reason that gun control advocates do not react to shootings in places like Chicago where gun control keeps law abiding citizens unarmed. Criminals bypass those laws as criminals are wont to do. There were 515 homicides in Chicago in 2019, which is thankfully lower than the previous three years. But it’s still much higher than in places where gun control is less of an issue. Utah, a state with more people than Chicago and much looser gun laws, had 80 homicides in 2019. These are the types of narratives the organizers and mega-donor supporters of March For Our Lives do not want you to hear.
The nation’s gun control agenda is not being driven by a groundswell of grassroots activists. The millions of dollars they are collecting mostly come from rich radical progressives who want the rest of us disarmed.
We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.
[gravityform id=”2″ title=”true” description=”false”]


noqreport--2020-01-07--Nikki Haley: Democratic leadership, candidates ‘the only ones mourning the loss of Soleimani’

As usual , Nikki Haley was spot-on with her commentary on Sean Hannity ’ s Fox News show last night @ @ @ @ @ Ambassador to the United Nations defended President Trump ’ s decision to take out Qasem @ @ @ @ @ General who led the Quds forces and directed Iran ’ s proxy militia groups to @ @ @ @ @ .
He has been directly attributed to orders that have led to hundreds of American @ @ @ @ @ on our consulate in Bengazi , Libya , that left four Americans brutally murdered .
@ @ @ @ @ only people morning the death of Soleimani outside of Iran and Iraq are Democratic leadership @ @ @ @ @ for the nomination .
It doesn ’ t matter what President Trump does .
He @ @ @ @ @ would accuse him of harming the oncology industry .
Nikki Haley is correct about Democratic @ @ @ @ @ love party over country .
We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement .
If @ @ @ @ @ more , we will be sending out information in a few weeks .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
As usual, Nikki Haley was spot-on with her commentary on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show last night. The former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations defended President Trump’s decision to take out Qasem Soleimani, the Iranian Major General who led the Quds forces and directed Iran’s proxy militia groups to attack American and allied targets. He has been directly attributed to orders that have led to hundreds of American deaths, including the attack on our consulate in Bengazi, Libya, that left four Americans brutally murdered.
According to Haley, the only people morning the death of Soleimani outside of Iran and Iraq are Democratic leadership and the presidential candidates vying for the nomination.
“The only ones mourning the loss of Soleimani are our Democrat leadership and Democrat Presidential candidates.” pic.twitter.com/IZJJqpxkBE — Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) January 7, 2020
It doesn’t matter what President Trump does. He could cure cancer and Democrats would accuse him of harming the oncology industry. Nikki Haley is correct about Democratic leadership and candidates. They love party over country.
We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.
[gravityform id=”2″ title=”true” description=”false”]


noqreport--2020-01-07--Dear Adam Schiff: Release the Michael Atkinson transcript

Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson has secrets .
The man who green-lit the Ukrainian whistleblower ’ s complaint despite zero first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoing gave damaging , sealed testimony before the House Intelligence Committee .
According to ranking member Devin Nunes , the information Atkinson revealed information that hurts the Democrats ’ impeachment case .
He spoke to Sara Carter about the investigation into Atkinson ’ s dealings .
Devin Nunes : ‘ Republicans have an active investigation into ( IG Michael ) Atkinson ’ Nunes , R-CA , spoke to this reporter for Monday ’ s podcast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s secret testimony will expose that the Inspector General either lied or he needs to make corrections to his statements to lawmakers .
The transcripts has been kept from the public by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff , D-CA , because it is damaging to their “ impeachment scam , ” Nunes said .
The whistleblower , who has not been formally named by lawmakers , met with Schiff ’ s staff members prior to submitting their complaint to Atkinson .
Schiff was chided by Republican lawmakers and many members of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ committee had no contact with the whistleblower .
“ ( Atkinson ) is under active investigation .
I ’ m not gon na go any farther than that because you know obviously he has a chance to come in and prove his innocence , but my guess is Schiff , Atkinson they don ’ t want that transcript out because it ’ s very damaging , ” Rep. Nunes said .
From the beginning , questions have been popping up about the whistleblower ’ s relationship to House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ State operatives like Atkinson .
The complaint seemed coordinated and in many cases fabricated with clear contradictions in it when compared to the actual transcript of the call between President Trump and Ukraine President Zelensky .
Very little has been released about either the whistleblower or Atkinson , which makes the fact that Schiff blatantly lied about them even more concerning .
But Nunes and Republicans are restrained from finding answers or revealing the truth to the American people .
The Democrats have sole subpoena power and they ’ re not going to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for questioning any time soon .
There is too much on the line for Democrats , most notably their need for political weapons to be used against Republicans and President Trump in this year ’ s election .
As long as they can control the impeachment narrative , they will not do anything to make their story seem fabricated .
That includes keeping Atkinson ’ s testimony secret .
This is why it ’ s so important for patriots to apply as much public pressure as possible on Schiff to release the Atkinson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the press , but others in the media need to step up as well .
Conservative Treehouse posted an expansive followup to Carter ’ s reporting that sheds light on the conspiracy : CTH has previously outlined ICIG Michael Atkinson as a dirty player amid a network of very corrupt officials who hold self-interests from participating in unlawful abuses of government surveillance including the DOJ and FBI activity during the 2016 election .
On Sunday , October 6th , 2019 , even before the revelations of Schiff working with the whistle-blower surfaced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his concerns with the testimony of Michael Atkinson .
Nunes noted the testimony “ was a joke ” .
Nunes told Sirius XM ’ s Breitbart News Sunday host Matt Boyle , “ [ The ICIG is ] either totally incompetent or part of the deep state , and he ’ s got a lot of questions he needs to answer because he knowingly changed the form and the requirements in order to make sure that this whistleblower complaint got out publicly.
” Democrats scream about transparency unless it doesn ’ t support @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s the word .
The people need to see the Atkinson transcript posthaste .
Democrats ’ greatest fear is the people knowing the truth .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson has secrets. The man who green-lit the Ukrainian whistleblower’s complaint despite zero first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoing gave damaging, sealed testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. According to ranking member Devin Nunes, the information Atkinson revealed information that hurts the Democrats’ impeachment case. He spoke to Sara Carter about the investigation into Atkinson’s dealings.
Devin Nunes: ‘Republicans have an active investigation into (IG Michael) Atkinson’ Nunes, R-CA, spoke to this reporter for Monday’s podcast. He revealed that transcripts of Atkinson’s secret testimony will expose that the Inspector General either lied or he needs to make corrections to his statements to lawmakers. The transcripts has been kept from the public by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-CA, because it is damaging to their “impeachment scam,” Nunes said. The whistleblower, who has not been formally named by lawmakers, met with Schiff’s staff members prior to submitting their complaint to Atkinson. Schiff was chided by Republican lawmakers and many members of the media for falsely claiming that his committee had no contact with the whistleblower. “(Atkinson) is under active investigation. I’m not gonna go any farther than that because you know obviously he has a chance to come in and prove his innocence, but my guess is Schiff, Atkinson they don’t want that transcript out because it’s very damaging,” Rep. Nunes said.
From the beginning, questions have been popping up about the whistleblower’s relationship to House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff as well as ties to alleged Deep State operatives like Atkinson. The complaint seemed coordinated and in many cases fabricated with clear contradictions in it when compared to the actual transcript of the call between President Trump and Ukraine President Zelensky. Very little has been released about either the whistleblower or Atkinson, which makes the fact that Schiff blatantly lied about them even more concerning.
But Nunes and Republicans are restrained from finding answers or revealing the truth to the American people. The Democrats have sole subpoena power and they’re not going to be bringing in the whistleblower or Atkinson for questioning any time soon. There is too much on the line for Democrats, most notably their need for political weapons to be used against Republicans and President Trump in this year’s election. As long as they can control the impeachment narrative, they will not do anything to make their story seem fabricated. That includes keeping Atkinson’s testimony secret.
This is why it’s so important for patriots to apply as much public pressure as possible on Schiff to release the Atkinson transcript. Carter is pushing the fight from the press, but others in the media need to step up as well. Conservative Treehouse posted an expansive followup to Carter’s reporting that sheds light on the conspiracy:
Devin Nunes Tells Sara Carter: “ICIG Michael Atkinson is Under Active Investigation”… CTH has previously outlined ICIG Michael Atkinson as a dirty player amid a network of very corrupt officials who hold self-interests from participating in unlawful abuses of government surveillance including the DOJ and FBI activity during the 2016 election. On Sunday, October 6th, 2019, even before the revelations of Schiff working with the whistle-blower surfaced, ranking member Devin Nunes originally discussed his concerns with the testimony of Michael Atkinson. Nunes noted the testimony “was a joke”. Nunes told Sirius XM’s Breitbart News Sunday host Matt Boyle, “[The ICIG is] either totally incompetent or part of the deep state, and he’s got a lot of questions he needs to answer because he knowingly changed the form and the requirements in order to make sure that this whistleblower complaint got out publicly.”
Democrats scream about transparency unless it doesn’t support their narrative, in which case mum’s the word. The people need to see the Atkinson transcript posthaste. Democrats’ greatest fear is the people knowing the truth.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-06--Trump’s Iran Strategy – Smart or Dangerous?

The logic that if a terrorist like Qassem Soleimani has an official title with a state that they are off-limits even as they actively seek to attack us is ludicrous .
Trump ’ s detractors are basically making the argument that if Osama Bin Laden was an official with the Afghan government , he would have been off-limits .
They are also making the argument that taking down murderous criminals is ill-advised because of the possibility of retaliation .
So if you are a member of a drug cartel or MS-13 , please feel free to come here and kill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you might get more violent and kill more of us if we confront you .
We know we must confront evil in this world , and killing Qassem Soleimani was a good thing , but we must also be careful and calculating if and when Iran strikes again .
Now is this a smart or a dangerous strategy ?
I believe it is both .
The show of overwhelming force and warning of targeting of sites to warn the Iran government is strategically smart and an excellent example of utilizing game-theory in international @ @ @ @ @ @ @ striking sites that are important to Iranian culture .
The reason this is dangerous is that these sites are most likely of religious importance .
You not only want the Iranians that want regime change on your side , but you do not want to have blowback by other countries in the region .
Excluding Israel , the population of Middle Eastern countries is predominately Muslim .
The Islamic Republic of Iran would want nothing else than to garner sympathy in the region and cast this as a war on Islam .
Iran @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we can not give it to them .
What we need to do is wisely choose targets that would deliver a crushing blow on the Iranian government from conducting further attacks against the US and its allies .
Targeting of their radar sites , naval capabilities from attempting to block the Straits of Hormuz , and so forth .
We must make it clear to the region and to the Iranian people that we are not against them or Islam .
Therefore , we will not target facilities like power plants that serve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Irans ability to start a war .
The United States must make it clear we do not wish the Iranian people to suffer , and we do not want war .
We will do all we can to limit their suffering , and it is up to the Iranian people to demand and stand up against their oppressors , the leadership of Iran .
I would warn caution to President Trump and our leadership .
Do not strike Iranian cultural sites , but do not back off .
Demonstrate resolve and strength @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the civilized world .
If we do this , we will not only win but could bring much-needed stability to the region .
Konstantinos Roditis studied Political Science International Relations from the University of California , San Diego , and 2018 nominated candidate for California State Controller .
You can follow him on Twitter & Facebook .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
The logic that if a terrorist like Qassem Soleimani has an official title with a state that they are off-limits even as they actively seek to attack us is ludicrous.
Trump’s detractors are basically making the argument that if Osama Bin Laden was an official with the Afghan government, he would have been off-limits.
They are also making the argument that taking down murderous criminals is ill-advised because of the possibility of retaliation.
So if you are a member of a drug cartel or MS-13, please feel free to come here and kill us because we are too scared that you might get more violent and kill more of us if we confront you.
We know we must confront evil in this world, and killing Qassem Soleimani was a good thing, but we must also be careful and calculating if and when Iran strikes again.
President Trump Tweeted:
Iran is talking very boldly about targeting certain USA assets as revenge for our ridding the world of their terrorist leader who had just killed an American, & badly wounded many others, not to mention all of the people he had killed over his lifetime, including recently…. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 4, 2020
….hundreds of Iranian protesters. He was already attacking our Embassy, and preparing for additional hits in other locations. Iran has been nothing but problems for many years. Let this serve as a WARNING that if Iran strikes any Americans, or American assets, we have….. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 4, 2020
….targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture, and those targets, and Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD. The USA wants no more threats! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 4, 2020
Now is this a smart or a dangerous strategy? I believe it is both.
The show of overwhelming force and warning of targeting of sites to warn the Iran government is strategically smart and an excellent example of utilizing game-theory in international relations.
The dangerous part is considering striking sites that are important to Iranian culture.
The reason this is dangerous is that these sites are most likely of religious importance. You not only want the Iranians that want regime change on your side, but you do not want to have blowback by other countries in the region.
Excluding Israel, the population of Middle Eastern countries is predominately Muslim. The Islamic Republic of Iran would want nothing else than to garner sympathy in the region and cast this as a war on Islam.
Iran wants a religious war narrative, and we cannot give it to them.
What we need to do is wisely choose targets that would deliver a crushing blow on the Iranian government from conducting further attacks against the US and its allies.
Targeting of their radar sites, naval capabilities from attempting to block the Straits of Hormuz, and so forth.
We must make it clear to the region and to the Iranian people that we are not against them or Islam. Therefore, we will not target facilities like power plants that serve a civil function. We are focusing on Irans ability to start a war.
The United States must make it clear we do not wish the Iranian people to suffer, and we do not want war. We will do all we can to limit their suffering, and it is up to the Iranian people to demand and stand up against their oppressors, the leadership of Iran.
I would warn caution to President Trump and our leadership. Do not strike Iranian cultural sites, but do not back off. Demonstrate resolve and strength in confronting the enemies of America and of the civilized world.
If we do this, we will not only win but could bring much-needed stability to the region.
Konstantinos Roditis studied Political Science International Relations from the University of California, San Diego, and 2018 nominated candidate for California State Controller. You can follow him on Twitter & Facebook.


noqreport--2020-01-06--183 arsonists arrested: Are climate change alarmists to blame for Australia’s massive fires?

The prevailing narrative surrounding Australia ’ s fires that have caused unprecedented damage as well as at least 18 deaths is that they ’ re the result of climate change .
“ Of course it ’ s climate change , ” an Australian politician told NOQ Report before learning the focus of our story and asking for anonymity .
“ Anyone with a brain and a science book knows this isn ’ t just bad luck or random weather .
Be sure to include that in your story , will ya ?
” We will .
We ’ ll also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of new revelations that reveal 85 % of the fires raging across Australia right now were started by humans and up to 37 % of them were intentional arsons .
Even a search on Google News showed only one Australian ( hidden behind a paywall ) and zero American mainstream media outlets reporting the truth of the matter .
Nearly 200 People Arrested Across Australia For Deliberately Starting Bushfires A total of 183 people have been arrested by police in Queensland , NSW , Victoria , South Australia and Tasmania for lighting bushfires @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obtained by news agency AAP show .
In New South Wales , 24 people were arrested for arson , risking prison sentences of up to 25 years .
In Queensland , police concluded that 103 of the fires had been deliberately lit , with 98 people , 67 of them juveniles , having been identified as the culprits .
Around 85 per cent of bushfires are caused by humans either deliberately or accidentally starting them , according to Dr Paul Read , co-director of the National Centre for Research in Bushfire and Arson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s round of fires is much bigger because of climate change , some will say .
They ’ ll point to record high temperatures as the reason they ’ re spreading so quickly .
This may be partially true as the current weather cycle has Australia seeing record heat .
But there ’ s another viable theory .
With the rise of organizations like Extinction Rebellion and other radical climate change alarmist groups going to extreme measures to prove their point , could they be behind the dramatic increase in the number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In fact , considering “ juveniles ” make up a majority of arsons , it would seem likely many of them are out to prove a point rather than just having fun burning people to death .
In response to Paul Joseph Watson ’ s article , conservative activist Mindy Robinson tossed out the theory .
I asked the aforementioned Australian politician about it , which is what prompted her to ask what my story was about .
When she learned it was a conspiracy theory about climate change radicals , she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ summer .
When I noted the sharp rise this year , she said the heat caused by climate change is making people crazier .
You can ’ t make this up , but therein lies the root of the problem .
So much intellectual skin has been put into the climate change game , especially by leftist politicians , that their theories about man-made climate change are beyond reproach in their minds .
Settled science .
Only fools think otherwise .
It ’ s clear the climate is changing .
Whether that ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ changes in our Sun , or random highs and lows that seem to disappear in what scientists call “ pauses ” in the climate ’ s path towards apocalypse is unknown .
But any of those theories holds more true scientific weight than man-made climate change .
This is why the climate change alarmists are so determined to make their point .
They believe it , therefore they need it to be true .
Is Australia burning as a result of people needing it to be true so badly that they ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to speak , by starting bushfires ?
Progressive politicians , mainstream media , and climate change activists are certain Australia is burning because of man-made climate change .
But evidence points to man-made bushfires being the culprit .
Is it activism gone rogue ?

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
The prevailing narrative surrounding Australia’s fires that have caused unprecedented damage as well as at least 18 deaths is that they’re the result of climate change. “Of course it’s climate change,” an Australian politician told NOQ Report before learning the focus of our story and asking for anonymity. “Anyone with a brain and a science book knows this isn’t just bad luck or random weather. Be sure to include that in your story, will ya?”
We will. We’ll also point to the uncanny lack of coverage of new revelations that reveal 85% of the fires raging across Australia right now were started by humans and up to 37% of them were intentional arsons. Even a search on Google News showed only one Australian (hidden behind a paywall) and zero American mainstream media outlets reporting the truth of the matter.
Nearly 200 People Arrested Across Australia For Deliberately Starting Bushfires A total of 183 people have been arrested by police in Queensland, NSW, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania for lighting bushfires over the last few months, figures obtained by news agency AAP show. In New South Wales, 24 people were arrested for arson, risking prison sentences of up to 25 years. In Queensland, police concluded that 103 of the fires had been deliberately lit, with 98 people, 67 of them juveniles, having been identified as the culprits. Around 85 per cent of bushfires are caused by humans either deliberately or accidentally starting them, according to Dr Paul Read, co-director of the National Centre for Research in Bushfire and Arson.
Ah, but this year’s round of fires is much bigger because of climate change, some will say. They’ll point to record high temperatures as the reason they’re spreading so quickly. This may be partially true as the current weather cycle has Australia seeing record heat. But there’s another viable theory. With the rise of organizations like Extinction Rebellion and other radical climate change alarmist groups going to extreme measures to prove their point, could they be behind the dramatic increase in the number of arsons being committed? It seems plausible. In fact, considering “juveniles” make up a majority of arsons, it would seem likely many of them are out to prove a point rather than just having fun burning people to death.
In response to Paul Joseph Watson’s article, conservative activist Mindy Robinson tossed out the theory.
I don’t get it, even with the fires here it’s always just some crazy person. How the flying hell does Australia have 200 psychopaths willing to burn all that land and those animals to death? Were they climate activists doing it to try to push their narrative, or something? — Mindy Robinson ?? (@iheartmindy) January 6, 2020
I asked the aforementioned Australian politician about it, which is what prompted her to ask what my story was about. When she learned it was a conspiracy theory about climate change radicals, she said kids always start fires in the summer. When I noted the sharp rise this year, she said the heat caused by climate change is making people crazier. You can’t make this up, but therein lies the root of the problem. So much intellectual skin has been put into the climate change game, especially by leftist politicians, that their theories about man-made climate change are beyond reproach in their minds. Settled science. Only fools think otherwise.
It’s clear the climate is changing. Whether that’s part of the cycle, documented changes in our Sun, or random highs and lows that seem to disappear in what scientists call “pauses” in the climate’s path towards apocalypse is unknown. But any of those theories holds more true scientific weight than man-made climate change. This is why the climate change alarmists are so determined to make their point. They believe it, therefore they need it to be true. Is Australia burning as a result of people needing it to be true so badly that they’re willing to plant the evidence, so to speak, by starting bushfires?
Progressive politicians, mainstream media, and climate change activists are certain Australia is burning because of man-made climate change. But evidence points to man-made bushfires being the culprit. Is it activism gone rogue?