noqreport--2020-01-30--Beth Moore attacks discernment on social media. I wonder why…

On the upcoming release of her new book , Beth Moore took to Twitter on January 28 , 2019 to lob an attack from on her high platform at those beneath her who criticize her and her teachings .
Calling criticism slander , Beth Moore took an elitist tone towards the “ tens of thousands ” of people who on social media have the same capacity , though not the same reach , to speak as she herself does .
What ’ s ironic , though not really , is that Beth Moore is accusing others of what she is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accuses .
She slanders the brethren as fundamentalists , those unable to differentiate between primary and tertiary issues , for adhering to biblical orthodoxy when she is making it obvious has noticeably deviated from orthodoxy she is believed to have held by championing the Social Justice Gospel and numerous false teachers .
This tweet is bait for her critics , like ourselves .
This tweet is a reply although not direct to her critics .
It ’ s exactly the same behavior we saw when Richard Caldwell strawmanned discernment blogs .
These people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ words broad .
They do not want to empower the discerning believers , the Evangelical Dark Web as we refer to those tens of thousands who because of the internet can compete in the arena of theological debate with the Lifeway Queen herself .
Because of such amenities , we can call out and call out effectively the strange doctrines and heterodox behavior of the elitists in Big Eva .
And they can not seem to help themselves by hiding their disdain for discernment .
She calls us slanderers , but we have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our Discernment ministry .
This verdict is well documented on why we should avoid Beth Moore ’ s teachings falling just shy of pronouncing her as a false teacher or heretic , but noting that her behavior and ambiguity renders her unqualified for ministry .
I want to finish off with a bit of hope .
The backlash from Beth Moore is reactive , not preemptive .
This means that she has taken damage and is returning fire .
When President Trump ordered the attack on the Iranian General , the Iranians were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so they orchestrated a show attack , knowing that they have been bested .
The situations are not all identical , though the concepts are the same .
There ’ s a persistent pattern within Big Eva to not name names because they know that if they do it will not end well .
Social media has left many elites exposed and information travels fast online .
If they attack , say Capstone Report to use a recent example , they know we will rally behind Capstone Report .
And that ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , especially as sites like the ones we promote in DarkLinks are thriving .
So they want to harm us without confrontation .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
On the upcoming release of her new book, Beth Moore took to Twitter on January 28, 2019 to lob an attack from on her high platform at those beneath her who criticize her and her teachings. Calling criticism slander, Beth Moore took an elitist tone towards the “tens of thousands” of people who on social media have the same capacity, though not the same reach, to speak as she herself does.
What’s ironic, though not really, is that Beth Moore is accusing others of what she is doing. She feels affirmed when she accuses. She slanders the brethren as fundamentalists, those unable to differentiate between primary and tertiary issues, for adhering to biblical orthodoxy when she is making it obvious has noticeably deviated from orthodoxy she is believed to have held by championing the Social Justice Gospel and numerous false teachers.
This tweet is bait for her critics, like ourselves. This tweet is a reply although not direct to her critics. It’s exactly the same behavior we saw when Richard Caldwell strawmanned discernment blogs. These people do not name names, keeping their words broad. They do not want to empower the discerning believers, the Evangelical Dark Web as we refer to those tens of thousands who because of the internet can compete in the arena of theological debate with the Lifeway Queen herself. Because of such amenities, we can call out and call out effectively the strange doctrines and heterodox behavior of the elitists in Big Eva. And they cannot seem to help themselves by hiding their disdain for discernment.
She calls us slanderers, but we have evidence on Beth Moore as part of our Discernment ministry. This verdict is well documented on why we should avoid Beth Moore’s teachings falling just shy of pronouncing her as a false teacher or heretic, but noting that her behavior and ambiguity renders her unqualified for ministry.
I want to finish off with a bit of hope. The backlash from Beth Moore is reactive, not preemptive. This means that she has taken damage and is returning fire. When President Trump ordered the attack on the Iranian General, the Iranians were too cowardly to go to war, so they orchestrated a show attack, knowing that they have been bested. The situations are not all identical, though the concepts are the same.
There’s a persistent pattern within Big Eva to not name names because they know that if they do it will not end well. Social media has left many elites exposed and information travels fast online. If they attack, say Capstone Report to use a recent example, they know we will rally behind Capstone Report. And that’s exactly what Big Eva does not want, especially as sites like the ones we promote in DarkLinks are thriving. So they want to harm us without confrontation.
Originally published on Evangelical Dark Web.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-31--Utah’s H.B. 217 could help Utah voters recall Mitt Romney

Mitt Romney is expected to vote for witnesses in the impeachment trial today .
He does so against the will of the party and a majority of people in Utah , which he was sent to Washington DC to represent .
He also does so against the best interests of the nation , as there are only left-wing arguments that can be made to justify extending a fruitless impeachment any longer .
A new bill being promoted by Utah Representative Steve Quinn , H.B .
217 , would establish a mechanism through which voters in the state could recall a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bill is not about Romney , but the timing of the Republican ’ s bill couldn ’ t be more conspicuous .
“ If I had a dollar for everyone who asked me today [ after the bill was made public ] if this was about Sen. Romney , I would have $ 20 , ” said Quinn .
Despite his protestations , any support for the bill will come from those who are angry with Romney for his clear betrayal .
He hates President Trump .
Nobody disputes this other than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He has opposed the President at every turn since long before he became a Senator , and he has continued to try to subvert Republican leadership on the impeachment issue .
It ’ s a longshot , as the threshold laid out in the bill is 25 % of voters from the previous election .
But given the state of affairs ahead of the 2020 election , if there was ever a time this could happen , it ’ s now .
If the bill becomes law , a concerted effort to recall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republican would be necessary .
It ’ s rare for Republicans to support the recall of a Republican , but Mitt Romney is a unique situation .
He ’ s representing a state that President Trump won by 18-points , and it was only that close because Evan McMullin got 21 % .
Romney needs to go .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Mitt Romney is expected to vote for witnesses in the impeachment trial today. He does so against the will of the party and a majority of people in Utah, which he was sent to Washington DC to represent. He also does so against the best interests of the nation, as there are only left-wing arguments that can be made to justify extending a fruitless impeachment any longer.
A new bill being promoted by Utah Representative Steve Quinn, H.B. 217, would establish a mechanism through which voters in the state could recall a sitting United States Senator. He says the bill is not about Romney, but the timing of the Republican’s bill couldn’t be more conspicuous.
“If I had a dollar for everyone who asked me today [after the bill was made public] if this was about Sen. Romney, I would have $20,” said Quinn.
Despite his protestations, any support for the bill will come from those who are angry with Romney for his clear betrayal. He hates President Trump. Nobody disputes this other than those playing the political correctness game. He has opposed the President at every turn since long before he became a Senator, and he has continued to try to subvert Republican leadership on the impeachment issue.
It’s a longshot, as the threshold laid out in the bill is 25% of voters from the previous election. But given the state of affairs ahead of the 2020 election, if there was ever a time this could happen, it’s now. If the bill becomes law, a concerted effort to recall Romney and replace him with an actual Republican would be necessary.
It’s rare for Republicans to support the recall of a Republican, but Mitt Romney is a unique situation. He’s representing a state that President Trump won by 18-points, and it was only that close because Evan McMullin got 21%. Romney needs to go.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-31--Adam Schiff tried to stop Jerry Nadler from answering the final question during impeachment

There was one thing we learned from the impeachment debacle .
House Manager Adam Schiff is a primadonna .
This was HIS stage .
This was HIS case .
The other Democrats were there to give him an occasional break and grab some clips for their reelection campaign that say , “ Impeachment ?
Yep , we were there !
” That ’ s why it was hilarious to watch Schiff have his final glory stolen by his own partner in crime , House Manager Jerry Nadler , who strolled up to the mic ahead of Schiff to close out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ question of impeachment Q & A .
Schiff wasn ’ t pleased .
This impeachment was supposed to be the launching pad for Adam Schiff where he could finally be face recognizable by Jeopardy !
contestants .
But Jerry Nadler had other plans , stealing the show in its final moments to Schiff ’ s dismay .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
There was one thing we learned from the impeachment debacle. House Manager Adam Schiff is a primadonna. This was HIS stage. This was HIS case. The other Democrats were there to give him an occasional break and grab some clips for their reelection campaign that say, “Impeachment? Yep, we were there!”
That’s why it was hilarious to watch Schiff have his final glory stolen by his own partner in crime, House Manager Jerry Nadler, who strolled up to the mic ahead of Schiff to close out the Democrats’ argument during the final question of impeachment Q&A. Schiff wasn’t pleased.
Here's the video of Jerry Nadler getting up to answer the final question of the two day Q & A session and Adam Schiff trying to stop him ??? pic.twitter.com/zYNQ1iY43I — Shem Horne (@Shem_Infinite) January 31, 2020
This impeachment was supposed to be the launching pad for Adam Schiff where he could finally be face recognizable by Jeopardy! contestants. But Jerry Nadler had other plans, stealing the show in its final moments to Schiff’s dismay.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-31--With end of impeachment in sight, here’s how to respond to claims of GOP ‘cover up’

My friends often accuse me of being too strategic .
There doesn ’ t always have to be a plan , they say .
My family refuses to let me plan out surprise parties because they say my ideas are far too intricate .
In everyday life , I ’ m accused of overthinking things .
In politics , my analyses usually work .
Now that the impeachment trial seems to be coming to an end shortly thanks to Senator Lamar Alexander stepping away from the Dark Side , there are many ways to counter the inevitable charges by Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ engaged in a “ cover up.
” Our responses will elicit many possible reactions .
In most cases , we ’ ll juice them up and make them try harder to get Democrats elected .
This is the reaction we want to avoid .
Instead , we want them to walk away questioning whether the Democrats are really worth fighting for at all .
With that goal in mind , let ’ s look at a few of the responses we could give them that will only make them fight harder from now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will shut some of them down .
• “ The charges weren ’ t impeachable.
” This is true .
It ’ s always been true ever since the House Democrats decided to take this on .
Ultimately , it ’ s what swayed Alexander from voting for more witnesses .
But considering it ’ s subjective ( to Democrats , at least ) , this will bring back the counterargument that if there were witnesses , we would have seen how impeachable the offenses were .
This comment will juice them up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House Democrats had 17 witnesses.
” Again , this is true .
Well , technically it was 18 , but the President ’ s defense kept hammering the 17-witness-narrative , so we ’ ll go with that .
This response will stimulate arguments that Senate impeachment trials have always had witnesses or that new information ( John Bolton ) arrived since the Articles of Impeachment were voted on by the House .
This comment will juice them up from now until November .
• “ It ’ s over .
You lost .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ normal circumstances , this would be the right response when one side wins and one side loses .
But this isn ’ t a normal circumstance .
Democrats are going to invoke the “ cover up ” regardless of what we say , but this response encourages them to “ move on ” by fighting harder .
This comment will juice them up from now until November .
Now that those are out of the way , how should we respond to disgruntled Democrats ?
Remember , we ’ re not trying to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t be removed from office since they ’ ve felt that way since before he was voted into office .
The goal here is to use this as an opportunity to weaken their political spirit .
We want them to understand one important truth , which is… Nancy Pelosi launched this impeachment to accomplish three goals : Divide the nation , harm most Democratic candidates , and create talking points against a booming economy .
This all must go back to the beginning .
Pelosi started this knowing it wouldn ’ t be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be .
She launched impeachment knowing there wasn ’ t a realistic expectation of removing the President from office , which would be a “ loss ” for her party .
But she was desperate .
Attempts to weaken the economy through her mainstream media doomsaying proxies wasn ’ t working , and no opposition party wants to go up against a booming economy .
Therefore , she changed the subject .
As the impeachment debacle draws to a close , Democrats are going to play this as their case for November .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ planned by Nancy Pelosi and meticulously executed .
She divided the nation to serve her needs .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
My friends often accuse me of being too strategic. There doesn’t always have to be a plan, they say. My family refuses to let me plan out surprise parties because they say my ideas are far too intricate. In everyday life, I’m accused of overthinking things. In politics, my analyses usually work.
Usually.
Now that the impeachment trial seems to be coming to an end shortly thanks to Senator Lamar Alexander stepping away from the Dark Side, there are many ways to counter the inevitable charges by Democrats in our circles that Republican Senators are engaged in a “cover up.” Our responses will elicit many possible reactions. In most cases, we’ll juice them up and make them try harder to get Democrats elected. This is the reaction we want to avoid. Instead, we want them to walk away questioning whether the Democrats are really worth fighting for at all.
With that goal in mind, let’s look at a few of the responses we could give them that will only make them fight harder from now until November before revealing the response that will shut some of them down.
“The charges weren’t impeachable.” This is true. It’s always been true ever since the House Democrats decided to take this on. Ultimately, it’s what swayed Alexander from voting for more witnesses. But considering it’s subjective (to Democrats, at least), this will bring back the counterargument that if there were witnesses, we would have seen how impeachable the offenses were. This comment will juice them up from now until November.
This is true. It’s always been true ever since the House Democrats decided to take this on. Ultimately, it’s what swayed Alexander from voting for more witnesses. But considering it’s subjective (to Democrats, at least), this will bring back the counterargument that if there were witnesses, we would have seen how impeachable the offenses were. This comment will juice them up from now until November. “House Democrats had 17 witnesses.” Again, this is true. Well, technically it was 18, but the President’s defense kept hammering the 17-witness-narrative, so we’ll go with that. This response will stimulate arguments that Senate impeachment trials have always had witnesses or that new information (John Bolton) arrived since the Articles of Impeachment were voted on by the House. This comment will juice them up from now until November.
Again, this is true. Well, technically it was 18, but the President’s defense kept hammering the 17-witness-narrative, so we’ll go with that. This response will stimulate arguments that Senate impeachment trials have always had witnesses or that new information (John Bolton) arrived since the Articles of Impeachment were voted on by the House. This comment will juice them up from now until November. “It’s over. You lost. Let’s move on.” Under normal circumstances, this would be the right response when one side wins and one side loses. But this isn’t a normal circumstance. Democrats are going to invoke the “cover up” regardless of what we say, but this response encourages them to “move on” by fighting harder. This comment will juice them up from now until November.
Now that those are out of the way, how should we respond to disgruntled Democrats? Remember, we’re not trying to convince them that the President shouldn’t be removed from office since they’ve felt that way since before he was voted into office.
The goal here is to use this as an opportunity to weaken their political spirit. We want them to understand one important truth, which is…
Nancy Pelosi launched this impeachment to accomplish three goals: Divide the nation, harm most Democratic candidates, and create talking points against a booming economy.
I elaborated on Twitter.
As it turns out, Pelosi was absolutely right. By pushing this partisan impeachment, she divided us… ✔ Intentionally.
✔ Unambiguously.
✔ Strategically. She predicted what would happen and moved forward with it because that's exactly what she wanted to happen. — JD Rucker (@JDRucker) January 31, 2020
Impeachment Result One: A nation divided. She knew it would happen. She said it would happen. It happened. Democrats feel cheated. There was no way a partisan impeachment could have ended differently, as she stated. Therefore, this was an intended consequence from the start. — JD Rucker (@JDRucker) January 31, 2020
Half of the top-tier candidates were tied up on the Senate floor for the crucial days leading up to the Iowa caucus. Who benefits from all of this? Just Joe Biden and Michael Bloomberg. The former was clearly intentional. The latter was an unexpected (maybe not) consequence. — JD Rucker (@JDRucker) January 31, 2020
Bottom Line: Nancy Pelosi divided the nation willfully to accomplish three political goals. She did so knowing there was zero chance it would result in the President's removal. She did so knowing it would hurt the nation but potentially help her party. She needs to go. — JD Rucker (@JDRucker) January 31, 2020
This all must go back to the beginning. Pelosi started this knowing it wouldn’t be bipartisan even after she said it must be. She launched impeachment knowing there wasn’t a realistic expectation of removing the President from office, which would be a “loss” for her party. But she was desperate. Attempts to weaken the economy through her mainstream media doomsaying proxies wasn’t working, and no opposition party wants to go up against a booming economy.
Therefore, she changed the subject.
As the impeachment debacle draws to a close, Democrats are going to play this as their case for November. But the end result was preordained, planned by Nancy Pelosi and meticulously executed. She divided the nation to serve her needs.
Dr. Joseph Mercola said, “Synthetic meat is the epitome of ultraprocessed food, and it seems naïve to think it won’t have health effects similar to other ultraprocessed junk foods.” For All-American REAL beef raised in pastures, sous vide, then freeze-dried for long-term storage, visit Whole Cows and use promo code “no junk” at checkout.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-03--Google’s Super Bowl commercial, Loretta, is a prelude to the dystopian future

When Google first hit the scene , it offered a solution .
Just one .
It found things on the internet , and at the time it did it better than anyone else .
Better than Yahoo .
Better than Alta Vista .
Better than Ask Jeeves .
Its algorithm and web-crawling strategies were years ahead of the competitors .
It ’ s no wonder that it continued to be an innovator until it no longer needed to be .
Things changed for Google when they realized they no longer had to beat the competition to the punch when it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to their second big breakthrough , the mastery of online ads , they were able to accumulate so much money that they simply bought those who did the innovation and creation for them .
That ’ s the point that many people attribute to their final transcendence from a search company to a true tech giant , but there was one more mountain to climb , and they started their ascent ahead of most .
They are still climbing the mountain today .
It ’ s the longest , hardest mountain they or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to climb .
It ’ s tied into nearly all of their current ambitions , from being the hub of everything that pertains to human health to creating the first true artificial intelligence that is not only self-expansive but also self-serving .
Today , all of their endeavors require one thing for fuel : data .
Specifically , they need your data , the ideas that can not be calculated with vast equations or solved with faster quantum computers .
Our personal data is the skeleton key to the future .
And we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as if this isn ’ t the company that dropped the mantra of “ don ’ t be evil ” from their employee handbook a couple of years ago .
It should have been huge and terrifying news to know that a company would literally wipe their only prevailing moral value to open the door to what they ’ re becoming today .
That ’ s an awfully long setup for a very short conclusion .
The Super Bowl ad they ran , “ Loretta , ” is another example of how Google @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us as possible for… something .
This isn ’ t just a convenience , though .
They may have all the money in the world , but they aren ’ t known for doing stupid things very often to waste it .
This ad space could have been used to promote any number of profitable products .
Instead , it was used for something much more valuable .
They planted a seed , one that was intended to prepare people for a future that is already here in the present , a future @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information than we give to our family members .
It ’ s more than we give to anyone , even Facebook .
There are two possible reactions from people who truly understand what Google is doing .
Those who see it as the convenience it ’ s being sold as will love it .
Those who realize their end goal is to become Big Brother are quite concerned .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
When Google first hit the scene, it offered a solution. Just one. It found things on the internet, and at the time it did it better than anyone else. Better than Yahoo. Better than Alta Vista. Better than Ask Jeeves. Its algorithm and web-crawling strategies were years ahead of the competitors. It’s no wonder that it continued to be an innovator until it no longer needed to be.
Things changed for Google when they realized they no longer had to beat the competition to the punch when it came to creation and innovation. Thanks to their second big breakthrough, the mastery of online ads, they were able to accumulate so much money that they simply bought those who did the innovation and creation for them. That’s the point that many people attribute to their final transcendence from a search company to a true tech giant, but there was one more mountain to climb, and they started their ascent ahead of most.
They are still climbing the mountain today. It’s the longest, hardest mountain they or any other tech giant has ever had to climb. It’s tied into nearly all of their current ambitions, from being the hub of everything that pertains to human health to creating the first true artificial intelligence that is not only self-expansive but also self-serving. Today, all of their endeavors require one thing for fuel: data. Specifically, they need your data, the ideas that cannot be calculated with vast equations or solved with faster quantum computers. Our personal data is the skeleton key to the future.
And we’re giving it to them willingly as if this isn’t the company that dropped the mantra of “don’t be evil” from their employee handbook a couple of years ago. It should have been huge and terrifying news to know that a company would literally wipe their only prevailing moral value to open the door to what they’re becoming today.
That’s an awfully long setup for a very short conclusion. The Super Bowl ad they ran, “Loretta,” is another example of how Google wants to collect as much data about us as possible for… something. This isn’t just a convenience, though. They may have all the money in the world, but they aren’t known for doing stupid things very often to waste it. This ad space could have been used to promote any number of profitable products. Instead, it was used for something much more valuable. They planted a seed, one that was intended to prepare people for a future that is already here in the present, a future in which we start giving them more information than we give to our family members. It’s more than we give to anyone, even Facebook.
There are two possible reactions from people who truly understand what Google is doing. Those who see it as the convenience it’s being sold as will love it. Those who realize their end goal is to become Big Brother are quite concerned.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-03--Celebrities are why the Super Bowl commercials sucked

Super Bowl commercials were once some of the greatest advertisements seen on television , but now it ’ s clear that March Madness has far exceeded the Super Bowl commercials .
The reason why the commercials are less funny then they used to be is simple : celebrities .
The high budget over the top flashy commercial appeals to few and is generally terrible at conveying the message advertisers want .
For instance , Coca-Cola ’ s commercial featuring Martin Scorsese and Jonah Hill relied on people first caring about two people they ( in all likelihood ) do not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their credibility .
Thus this commercial was so bad it invalidates Scorsese ’ s argument that Marvel movies aren ’ t cinema .
Contrast this with Jeep and Bill Murray .
They rehashed the movie Groundhog Day , on Groundhog Day .
This could have been painfully done .
But the focus of this commercial was not on the celebrity .
It was on the car .
Each repeated day , he went for the Jeep , and each day he had a different experience .
It would not have been as good @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an instance of celebrity enhancing an already well written commercial rather then being the commercial .
Charlie Day is a hilarious actor , but every time a Tide commercial came on the scene was a flat , unoriginal , half-rehash of a good commercial they did in the past .
This half-parody , half-repeat was repeated ad nauseum .
Then there were several ones relying on multiple celebrities , but because they are simply celebrities the normal viewer can not put a name to , acting as though they mean something proved both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in several commercials was a story .
For instance , Bill Murray relives Groundhog Day and has a different experience each day .
Charlie Day doesn ’ t know where the laundry room is .
One ’ s a story ; the other isn ’ t .
Sabra brought the extra cringe with their celebrity commercial .
I could go Don Drapier on all of these celebrity reliant commercials , but the Super Bowl commercials came off as lazy attempts to be cool , almost all of them .
It ’ s 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ve seen award show ratings tank , indicating people care less about celebrity endorsements than perhaps ever before .
And for celebrities to make the commercial simply by being themselves is simply a reminder that the actual game is the only reason to watch the Super Bowl in the first place .
Anything else , other than food and company of course , is a waste of time .
If you were wondering why the commercials aren ’ t nearly as good as they used to be , it ’ s all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the Super Bowl would be the pinnacle of good impactful advertisements , but we ’ ve since delved into a parody of a parody of what good advertising is and ought to be .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Super Bowl commercials were once some of the greatest advertisements seen on television, but now it’s clear that March Madness has far exceeded the Super Bowl commercials. The reason why the commercials are less funny then they used to be is simple: celebrities.
The high budget over the top flashy commercial appeals to few and is generally terrible at conveying the message advertisers want. For instance, Coca-Cola’s commercial featuring Martin Scorsese and Jonah Hill relied on people first caring about two people they (in all likelihood) do not care about, because it relies on their credibility. Thus this commercial was so bad it invalidates Scorsese’s argument that Marvel movies aren’t cinema.
Contrast this with Jeep and Bill Murray. They rehashed the movie Groundhog Day, on Groundhog Day. This could have been painfully done. But the focus of this commercial was not on the celebrity. It was on the car. Each repeated day, he went for the Jeep, and each day he had a different experience. It would not have been as good without Bill Murray, but this is an instance of celebrity enhancing an already well written commercial rather then being the commercial.
Charlie Day is a hilarious actor, but every time a Tide commercial came on the scene was a flat, unoriginal, half-rehash of a good commercial they did in the past. This half-parody, half-repeat was repeated ad nauseum.
Then there were several ones relying on multiple celebrities, but because they are simply celebrities the normal viewer cannot put a name to, acting as though they mean something proved both cringy and elitist.
What was missing in several commercials was a story. For instance, Bill Murray relives Groundhog Day and has a different experience each day. Charlie Day doesn’t know where the laundry room is. One’s a story; the other isn’t. Sabra brought the extra cringe with their celebrity commercial. I could go Don Drapier on all of these celebrity reliant commercials, but the Super Bowl commercials came off as lazy attempts to be cool, almost all of them. It’s 2020, and in the last decade we’ve seen award show ratings tank, indicating people care less about celebrity endorsements than perhaps ever before. And for celebrities to make the commercial simply by being themselves is simply a reminder that the actual game is the only reason to watch the Super Bowl in the first place. Anything else, other than food and company of course, is a waste of time.
If you were wondering why the commercials aren’t nearly as good as they used to be, it’s all the celebrities. It used to be that the Super Bowl would be the pinnacle of good impactful advertisements, but we’ve since delved into a parody of a parody of what good advertising is and ought to be.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-02--Senate Republicans should NOT acquit the President. Vacate the charges instead.

Senate Republicans blocked additional witnesses from the President ’ s Impeachment trial .
While this is good , it leaves open the argument that when the final vote acquits him , the trial will have been a sham .
Of course , the Left ’ s lapdogs in the drive-by media will trumpet this from the rooftops .
We don ’ t need this sort of slanderous outcome .
There is a better way .
First , let us make it clear that Donald Trump neither exceeded his lawful foreign policy authority in the cause of re-election , nor obstructed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prerogatives .
But an acquittal presumes that the charges Princess Pelosi , Pencil Neck Schiff , and Jerry Waddler so thoughtfully considered and tenderly carried across the Capital are actually “ high crimes or misdemeanors.
” Article 2 of the Congressional stillbirth is the easier issue .
As Alan Dershowitz pointed out , the House does not have an unlimited right to see Presidential documents and interview Presidential staff .
As in Nixon ’ s case , until the Supreme Court has rendered a final opinion , the President may restrict the House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court has ruled against him is it possible for him to obstruct Congress by withholding documents or staff .
Anything else would place the Congress above the Executive Branch , destroying the separation of powers inherent in our Constitutional design .
If the Senate acquits Trump on this Obstruction count , it will present to the House the presumption that their essential idea is valid , but that Trump didn ’ t do what they allege .
This is horrible .
Instead , it is essential that the Senate rebuff the legal basis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anything less would leave the House open to bring another set of articles for Obstruction the very next time Trump says they can ’ t have something .
They wouldn ’ t even need to subpoena documents or witnesses .
A simple request would become a command , under penalty of impeachment .
The proper action for the Senate to take is to Vacate Article 2 because it fails to state a high crime or misdemeanor .
In legalese , “ it fails to state a Constitutionally recognized cause of action.
” A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House has utterly failed in its Constitutional duty .
It would strike the Article from the Impeachment , leaving only Article 1 .
Article 1 is somewhat more involved , but the same issue applies .
Again , Alan Dershowitz carefully explained that the term “ Treason , Bribery , or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors ” is an inclusio , where all “ High Crimes and Misdemeanors ” are acts of a similar degree and criminality as “ Treason and Bribery.
” We should note with Dershowitz that the terms do not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ After all , bribery was not defined in US law until after the Constitution was adopted .
Thus , in this clause , criminality is not exactly identical to illegality .
Instead , the degree of criminality is inherent in the action , and must be notably similar to “ Treason and Bribery.
” Uncontroverted testimony showed that there was no criminality in the actions to which the House objected .
There were no fact witnesses that even identified horse trading .
Thus , the House ’ s Articles put forward hundreds of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outright fabrication , while failing to identify a single act with inherent criminality .
There is not a single documented piece of evidence having anything to do with election interference , the House ’ s prime concern .
The only possible complaint has to do with Trump mentioning Joe Biden , who , incidentally , only decided to run for President four days after Zelenskiy was elected on an anti-corruption platform .
Did he think being a candidate would insulate him from legal liability ?
In short , Article 1 is as deficient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state a Constitutional crime of Impeachment degree .
As a result , the Senate should vote to vacate Article 1 .
And this leaves the Senate in an interesting position .
If both Articles of Impeachment are vacated by the Senate , the Impeachment will be voided .
With a voided Impeachment , the Senate will have no Articles to vote on to either convict or acquit .
In a sense Trump won ’ t be vindicated , because there are no charges from which to be vindicated .
In a way , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the House will be reprimanded — told in no uncertain terms that only truly valid Constitutional charges will be considered by the Senate .
They got one bite at the apple , and got a face full of cold water rather than sweet fruit .
Should similarly deficient articles be submitted , they will also be rejected out of hand .
It is very important to respect the standards of criminality understood by the Founders .
The House has made a mockery of Impeachment in its headlong rush to find an excuse to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does not vacate these Articles , we will see a parade of Impeachments from the Democrats in the House .
If the Senate does vacate them , the House will have no option but to consider doing a more comprehensive evaluation of any charges against the President before presenting them to the Senate .
Impeachment was always intended to be a remedy for the rare President who paints waaaay outside the lines into manifest criminality .
It is inherently political , but it isn ’ t partisan .
The House ’ s Impeachment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must prevent such a travesty from happening again .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Senate Republicans blocked additional witnesses from the President’s Impeachment trial. While this is good, it leaves open the argument that when the final vote acquits him, the trial will have been a sham. Of course, the Left’s lapdogs in the drive-by media will trumpet this from the rooftops. We don’t need this sort of slanderous outcome. There is a better way.
First, let us make it clear that Donald Trump neither exceeded his lawful foreign policy authority in the cause of re-election, nor obstructed Congress in the pursuit of its lawful prerogatives. But an acquittal presumes that the charges Princess Pelosi, Pencil Neck Schiff, and Jerry Waddler so thoughtfully considered and tenderly carried across the Capital are actually “high crimes or misdemeanors.”
Article 2 of the Congressional stillbirth is the easier issue. As Alan Dershowitz pointed out, the House does not have an unlimited right to see Presidential documents and interview Presidential staff. As in Nixon’s case, until the Supreme Court has rendered a final opinion, the President may restrict the House’s access. Only after the Court has ruled against him is it possible for him to obstruct Congress by withholding documents or staff. Anything else would place the Congress above the Executive Branch, destroying the separation of powers inherent in our Constitutional design.
If the Senate acquits Trump on this Obstruction count, it will present to the House the presumption that their essential idea is valid, but that Trump didn’t do what they allege. This is horrible. Instead, it is essential that the Senate rebuff the legal basis for the House’s complaint. Anything less would leave the House open to bring another set of articles for Obstruction the very next time Trump says they can’t have something. They wouldn’t even need to subpoena documents or witnesses. A simple request would become a command, under penalty of impeachment.
The proper action for the Senate to take is to Vacate Article 2 because it fails to state a high crime or misdemeanor. In legalese, “it fails to state a Constitutionally recognized cause of action.” A vote to vacate would say that the House has utterly failed in its Constitutional duty. It would strike the Article from the Impeachment, leaving only Article 1.
Article 1 is somewhat more involved, but the same issue applies. Again, Alan Dershowitz carefully explained that the term “Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors” is an inclusio, where all “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” are acts of a similar degree and criminality as “Treason and Bribery.” We should note with Dershowitz that the terms do not necessarily refer to offenses against statutes. After all, bribery was not defined in US law until after the Constitution was adopted. Thus, in this clause, criminality is not exactly identical to illegality. Instead, the degree of criminality is inherent in the action, and must be notably similar to “Treason and Bribery.”
Uncontroverted testimony showed that there was no criminality in the actions to which the House objected. There were no fact witnesses that even identified horse trading. Thus, the House’s Articles put forward hundreds of pages of supposition, hearsay, and outright fabrication, while failing to identify a single act with inherent criminality. There is not a single documented piece of evidence having anything to do with election interference, the House’s prime concern. The only possible complaint has to do with Trump mentioning Joe Biden, who, incidentally, only decided to run for President four days after Zelenskiy was elected on an anti-corruption platform. Did he think being a candidate would insulate him from legal liability?
In short, Article 1 is as deficient as Article 2. It fails to state a Constitutional crime of Impeachment degree. As a result, the Senate should vote to vacate Article 1. And this leaves the Senate in an interesting position.
If both Articles of Impeachment are vacated by the Senate, the Impeachment will be voided. With a voided Impeachment, the Senate will have no Articles to vote on to either convict or acquit. In a sense Trump won’t be vindicated, because there are no charges from which to be vindicated. In a way, Trump will be “unimpeached” and the House will be reprimanded — told in no uncertain terms that only truly valid Constitutional charges will be considered by the Senate. They got one bite at the apple, and got a face full of cold water rather than sweet fruit. Should similarly deficient articles be submitted, they will also be rejected out of hand.
It is very important to respect the standards of criminality understood by the Founders. The House has made a mockery of Impeachment in its headlong rush to find an excuse to remove this President. If the Senate does not vacate these Articles, we will see a parade of Impeachments from the Democrats in the House. If the Senate does vacate them, the House will have no option but to consider doing a more comprehensive evaluation of any charges against the President before presenting them to the Senate.
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.
Impeachment was always intended to be a remedy for the rare President who paints waaaay outside the lines into manifest criminality. It is inherently political, but it isn’t partisan. The House’s Impeachment push is extremely partisan, and we must prevent such a travesty from happening again.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-02--Bloomberg’s Jennifer Epstein grossly misrepresents Senator Joni Ernst’s statement about Joe Biden

It ’ s getting harder and harder to blame progressive news outlets for their biased reporting .
Now that they ’ ve come out of the closet as unrepentant supporters and propagandists for the Democratic Party , many Americans have come to be suspicious of their headlines .
But Bloomberg.com has been relatively fair with their coverage , at least when compared to other outlets of similar size .
The allure of a “ gotcha ” hit piece on a Republican was too much for them to pass up as they contorted the words of Senator Joni Ernst ( R-IA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the news lately after “ spilling the beans ” on former Vice President Joe Biden .
It wasn ’ t intended to be a smear , but considering how Biden is falling in the polls , one can hardly fault him for trying to paint himself as a victim .
Bloomberg ’ s Jennifer Epstein added fuel to the fire against Ernst by misrepresenting something she said today : “ I think this door of impeachable whatever has been opened .
Joe Biden should be very careful what he ’ s asking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can have a situation where if it should ever be President Biden , that immediately , people , right the day after he would be elected would be saying , ‘ Well , we ’ re going to impeach him.
’ ” This is an accurate statement .
It wasn ’ t a threat .
It wasn ’ t a call to go after Biden .
It wasn ’ t even an insinuation that she would support such a concept .
Nevertheless , the headline and story by Bloomberg was inflammatory , suggesting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” for impeachment if he were to win .
This is a gross misrepresentation of the Senator ’ s comments that was designed to stir up calls of “ hypocrites ” from Democrats .
And it worked .
The bulk of comments and retweets seemed to take Epstein ’ s Tweet at face value , attacking Ernst and the GOP for something she never actually said .
This is how the left often operates .
Conservatives were mixed in their response .
Most called Epstein out for her deception .
Some cheered Ernst @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unlikely ) scenario in which Biden became president .
It ’ s a shame that mainstream media continues to operate as the propaganda wing for Democrats .
It ’ s time for Senator Ernst and other Republicans to take the McSally-approach : Treat them like the propagandists they are and refuse to answer questions .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
It’s getting harder and harder to blame progressive news outlets for their biased reporting. Now that they’ve come out of the closet as unrepentant supporters and propagandists for the Democratic Party, many Americans have come to be suspicious of their headlines. But Bloomberg.com has been relatively fair with their coverage, at least when compared to other outlets of similar size. The allure of a “gotcha” hit piece on a Republican was too much for them to pass up as they contorted the words of Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA).
The first-term lawmaker has been in the news lately after “spilling the beans” on former Vice President Joe Biden. It wasn’t intended to be a smear, but considering how Biden is falling in the polls, one can hardly fault him for trying to paint himself as a victim.
Bloomberg’s Jennifer Epstein added fuel to the fire against Ernst by misrepresenting something she said today: “I think this door of impeachable whatever has been opened. Joe Biden should be very careful what he’s asking for because, you know, we can have a situation where if it should ever be President Biden, that immediately, people, right the day after he would be elected would be saying, ‘Well, we’re going to impeach him.’”
This is an accurate statement. It wasn’t a threat. It wasn’t a call to go after Biden. It wasn’t even an insinuation that she would support such a concept. Nevertheless, the headline and story by Bloomberg was inflammatory, suggesting she indicated the GOP would “push” for impeachment if he were to win.
NEW: Joni Ernst tells me that there would “immediately” be a Republican push to impeach Biden over Ukraine if he’s elected https://t.co/vt38fewQxE — Jennifer Epstein (@jeneps) February 2, 2020
This is a gross misrepresentation of the Senator’s comments that was designed to stir up calls of “hypocrites” from Democrats. And it worked. The bulk of comments and retweets seemed to take Epstein’s Tweet at face value, attacking Ernst and the GOP for something she never actually said. This is how the left often operates.
Conservatives were mixed in their response. Most called Epstein out for her deception. Some cheered Ernst on in the hypothetical (and highly unlikely) scenario in which Biden became president.
Joni Ernst is correct. If we are going to use impeachment as a weapon, if that standard has been set, and it has, then it is going to be a weapon. https://t.co/tEJVpwwnmH — Carmine Sabia (@CarmineSabia) February 2, 2020
You're a liar, that's not what she said Ernst was being speculative and did not make a definitive statement Your own report does not even match your tweet, stop lying and spreading disinformation https://t.co/Le1ptjMaXF — Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) February 2, 2020
Spoiler Alert: That’s not what Joni actually said https://t.co/xJ21ZEPXCZ — Jack Posobiec?? (@JackPosobiec) February 2, 2020
Jennifer Epstein… you're being transparently dishonest. Your headline doesn't even state what your tweet claims; it says that "could" be the case "There would 'immediately' be…" is definitive "There could 'immediately' be…" is speculative Stop being so dishonest. https://t.co/FlGpZ3MB2X — (((Jason Rantz))) on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz) February 2, 2020
It’s a shame that mainstream media continues to operate as the propaganda wing for Democrats. It’s time for Senator Ernst and other Republicans to take the McSally-approach: Treat them like the propagandists they are and refuse to answer questions.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-02--#WalkAway town hall became free speech rally after Women’s Building canceled hours before event

Pro-Trump activists Scott Presler and Brandon Straka were doing what they do best yesterday in San Francisco .
Presler organized another successful clean up in the much-maligned downtown area and Straka was preparing to hold another # WalkAway LGBT Town Hall event .
But the Women ’ s Building in one of San Francisco ’ s most progressive neighborhoods alerted them hours before the event that they were canceling their contract .
Their reason : The clean up , which greatly benefits the neighborhood and those living on the streets , was deemed to be “ disparaging ” of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Last night # WalkAway came to San Francisco to help clean up the city earlier in the day with Scott Presler , then host a # WalkAway town hall for the LGBT community in the evening , ” Straka told NOQ Report .
“ The venue for the town hall cancelled our contract hours before the event , citing that our participation in the cleanup was a ‘ disparagement of the homeless community ’ .
” Instead of packing up and going home , event organizers turned the town hall into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Women ’ s Building .
Over 100 supporters , many of whom traveled from out of state to be at the event , rallied in support of President Trump and against the leftist movement they say is harming the nation and the LGBT community .
Counter-protesters gathered near them , and while there was plenty of yelling as well as pushing and shoving , no real violence broke out .
Law enforcement was nearby , prepared to step in if things got out of hand .
Earlier in the day , Presler @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the streets with 150 volunteers .
“ I organized a cleanup in San Francisco , just like I ’ ve done in Baltimore , Chicago , Houston , and Los Angeles , ” Pressler told NOQ Report .
“ We picked up trash and listened to the homeless community on how we can work together.
” While the cleanup was going on , Presler and others posted videos to social media of them talking to homeless people in the area about what their city was doing ( and more importantly , not doing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after these videos were live that leadership at the Women ’ s Builder were apparently “ triggered ” into canceling the contract .
“ After the cleanup , we were supposed to have a # WalkAway town hall with Brandon Straka and members of the LGBT community , ” Presler said .
“ The venue canceled the day of the event .
The truth is that there are people in society who don ’ t want to hear the truth .
The movement Brandon has built is real , with people walking away @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WalkAway Campaign “ encourages and supports those on the Left to walk away from the divisive tenets endorsed and mandated by the Democratic Party of today.
” Last night ’ s event in far-left San Francisco was intended to focus on a LGBT audience and featured four of the most outspoken Trump-supporting members of the community , including Blair White and Mike Harlow .
Straka received word via email that the venue had cancelled less than five hours before it was scheduled to begin .
As Straka noted , this cancellation was not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 5 # WalkAway LGBT Town Halls have been cancelled by venues citing that # WalkAway is a hate group , ” Straka said .
“ But , my team and I don ’ t go down without a fight .
In each case we found a new venue and the show went on and the community got its message : it ’ s time for LGBT people to leave the Democrat Party.
” Unlike past cancellations , they were informed too late to book another venue and inform those planning to attend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to turn it into a “ Freedom Rally ” just outside of the Women ’ s Building .
“ But last nights last minute cancellation in San Francisco led to the formation of a free speech rally outside of the canceling venue : the Women ’ s Building , ” he said .
“ Over 100 patriots showed up to fight for freedom and to stand up to the liberal left .
Dozens of deranged leftist protesters showed up in an attempt to shut down the free-speech rally .
But in the end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stronger , smarter , and much more loving , tolerant , and resilient .
Freedom won in San Francisco last night.
” While the town hall was canceled , the subsequent Freedom Rally may end up being a blessing in disguise .
Though no major media outlets have picked up the story yet , it will almost certainly make headlines this week as word of the attempted stifling and subversion reach the right ears .
Presler concluded by saying , “ I ’ m a conservative gay man who is cleaning up inner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fears most is other people seeing that we exist.
” Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Pro-Trump activists Scott Presler and Brandon Straka were doing what they do best yesterday in San Francisco. Presler organized another successful clean up in the much-maligned downtown area and Straka was preparing to hold another #WalkAway LGBT Town Hall event. But the Women’s Building in one of San Francisco’s most progressive neighborhoods alerted them hours before the event that they were canceling their contract. Their reason: The clean up, which greatly benefits the neighborhood and those living on the streets, was deemed to be “disparaging” of the homeless people it was trying to help.
“Last night #WalkAway came to San Francisco to help clean up the city earlier in the day with Scott Presler, then host a #WalkAway town hall for the LGBT community in the evening,” Straka told NOQ Report. “The venue for the town hall cancelled our contract hours before the event, citing that our participation in the cleanup was a ‘disparagement of the homeless community’.”
Instead of packing up and going home, event organizers turned the town hall into a free speech rally held outside of the Women’s Building. Over 100 supporters, many of whom traveled from out of state to be at the event, rallied in support of President Trump and against the leftist movement they say is harming the nation and the LGBT community.
Counter-protesters gathered near them, and while there was plenty of yelling as well as pushing and shoving, no real violence broke out. Law enforcement was nearby, prepared to step in if things got out of hand.
Earlier in the day, Presler’s now-famous inner-city clean ups hit the streets with 150 volunteers.
“I organized a cleanup in San Francisco, just like I’ve done in Baltimore, Chicago, Houston, and Los Angeles,” Pressler told NOQ Report. “We picked up trash and listened to the homeless community on how we can work together.”
While the cleanup was going on, Presler and others posted videos to social media of them talking to homeless people in the area about what their city was doing (and more importantly, not doing) for them. It was shortly after these videos were live that leadership at the Women’s Builder were apparently “triggered” into canceling the contract.
I met Osiris, a homeless American living on the streets of San Francisco, & he has a message for our politicians: Take care of us, not illegal immigrants. Please share this with the world. pic.twitter.com/E2oik44sbh — #ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) February 1, 2020
“After the cleanup, we were supposed to have a #WalkAway town hall with Brandon Straka and members of the LGBT community,” Presler said. “The venue canceled the day of the event. The truth is that there are people in society who don’t want to hear the truth. The movement Brandon has built is real, with people walking away from the Democrat Party.”
The #WalkAway Campaign “encourages and supports those on the Left to walk away from the divisive tenets endorsed and mandated by the Democratic Party of today.” Last night’s event in far-left San Francisco was intended to focus on a LGBT audience and featured four of the most outspoken Trump-supporting members of the community, including Blair White and Mike Harlow.
For those of you registered to attend tonight’s #WalkAway LGBT Town Hall, SF, the name of venue and location have been sent to you in an email. Please check! See you tonight!
FREE TIX: https://t.co/Q8sn2odHSO pic.twitter.com/cpo9H9NLy5 — Brandon Straka (@BrandonStraka) February 1, 2020
Straka received word via email that the venue had cancelled less than five hours before it was scheduled to begin.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
?RETWEET: #UNSILENT Our venue for tonight’s #WalkAway Town Hall JUST CANCELED us, citing: our “disparagement of the homeless” bc this was a duel event w/ @ScottPresler’s cleanup. WE WILL NOT BACK DOWN. Meet tonight at 6:30pm outside the Women’s Building for a FREE SPEECH RALLY‼ pic.twitter.com/8sKndaMcHu — Brandon Straka (@BrandonStraka) February 1, 2020
The Women's Building of SF has caved to extremist leftists who have labeled #WalkAway "anti-homeless community" and CANCELLED tonight's #WalkAway LGBT Town Hall. WE ARE FIGHTING BACK. JOIN US TONIGHT!!! https://t.co/k5ThMn1zsr — Brandon Straka (@BrandonStraka) February 1, 2020
As Straka noted, this cancellation was not an isolated occurrence.
“4 out of 5 #WalkAway LGBT Town Halls have been cancelled by venues citing that #WalkAway is a hate group,” Straka said. “But, my team and I don’t go down without a fight. In each case we found a new venue and the show went on and the community got its message: it’s time for LGBT people to leave the Democrat Party.”
Unlike past cancellations, they were informed too late to book another venue and inform those planning to attend, so Straka and his team decided to turn it into a “Freedom Rally” just outside of the Women’s Building.
“But last nights last minute cancellation in San Francisco led to the formation of a free speech rally outside of the canceling venue: the Women’s Building,” he said. “Over 100 patriots showed up to fight for freedom and to stand up to the liberal left. Dozens of deranged leftist protesters showed up in an attempt to shut down the free-speech rally. But in the end, #WalkAway’s people were stronger, smarter, and much more loving, tolerant, and resilient. Freedom won in San Francisco last night.”
While the town hall was canceled, the subsequent Freedom Rally may end up being a blessing in disguise. Though no major media outlets have picked up the story yet, it will almost certainly make headlines this week as word of the attempted stifling and subversion reach the right ears.
Presler concluded by saying, “I’m a conservative gay man who is cleaning up inner cities across America. What the left fears most is other people seeing that we exist.”
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-02--Canceled ‘gold standard’ Iowa poll: Mishap or another CNN/DNC anti-Bernie ploy?

On Monday , hundreds of thousands of Iowa Democrats are expected to caucus for their preferred nominee for president .
Many will end up with their second or third choices , as only candidates who meet the 15 % threshold will have their caucus votes counted .
It ’ s an odd process to those who have never participated , but supporters of the caucus system swear by it .
CNN and the Des Moines Register normally put out the “ gold standard ” poll ahead of the caucus that is supposed to be the most accurate in weighing support @ @ @ @ @ @ @ release was canceled at the last minute after reports of someone who claimed South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg ’ s name was not included in the list of preferences when he was called for the poll .
While most are taking it at face value , there are some who believe this was a ploy by CNN ( and possibly the DNC ) to subvert Senator Bernie Sanders ’ campaign .
He has been surging in recent weeks , including topping the previous CNN/DMR poll .
If the results of this poll showed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many expected , could their decision to scrap it based on one complaint be based on an anti-Bernie bias ?
Some believe this is the case .
CNN has recently seemed to be reporting unfavorably about Sanders for several weeks .
They released an article from information leaked by Senator Elizabeth Warren ’ s campaign that claimed Sanders said a woman couldn ’ t beat President Trump .
Then , they ambushed him at the last debate , asserting that he was lying when he denied the claim .
A big win for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a three-person race very quickly .
Vice President Joe Biden is holding out for South Carolina to be his first big win following expected victories for Sanders in Iowa and Vermont .
Meanwhile , billionaire Mike Bloomberg is banking ( literally ) on Super Tuesday a month after the Iowa caucus .
He needs the race to stay close , though , as his real play is for the convention .
Either CNN and the DNC were fortunate that this Buttigieg thing derailed their poll or they orchestrated it .
Either way , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign seem to be backfiring .
The more they hate on him , the higher his numbers go .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
On Monday, hundreds of thousands of Iowa Democrats are expected to caucus for their preferred nominee for president. Many will end up with their second or third choices, as only candidates who meet the 15% threshold will have their caucus votes counted. It’s an odd process to those who have never participated, but supporters of the caucus system swear by it.
CNN and the Des Moines Register normally put out the “gold standard” poll ahead of the caucus that is supposed to be the most accurate in weighing support for each individual candidate. But its release was canceled at the last minute after reports of someone who claimed South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s name was not included in the list of preferences when he was called for the poll.
The voter was an Iowa City area man who says the Iowa Poll polltaker didn’t name Buttigieg when asked which candidate he preferred. Voter said when she read a new list, she mispronounced Buttigieg’s name. https://t.co/MHRPktNkJy — Jennifer Jacobs (@JenniferJJacobs) February 2, 2020
While most are taking it at face value, there are some who believe this was a ploy by CNN (and possibly the DNC) to subvert Senator Bernie Sanders’ campaign. He has been surging in recent weeks, including topping the previous CNN/DMR poll. If the results of this poll showed him with a strong lead, which many expected, could their decision to scrap it based on one complaint be based on an anti-Bernie bias?
Some believe this is the case.
Breaking:
The will be no more polls because they all show @BernieSanders crushing the rest of the field.https://t.co/LiqMSJvuMT — Webstir ??Leftist Lawyers for #Bernie2020 (@TheRealWebstir) February 2, 2020
A single Buttigieg supporter claims Buttigieg’s name wasn’t given as an option during a phone poll, and now CNN is refusing to release the poll results. A cynic would have to be forgiven for wondering how big Bernie Sanders’ lead in the poll is. https://t.co/h9ja3WVRFd — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) February 2, 2020
Bernie Screwed Again – CNN/Des Moines Register Refuse To Publish Final Poll Showing Bernie Sanders Leading Iowa… https://t.co/0oyjCdGSz7 pic.twitter.com/kPNKdtOrJf — TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) February 2, 2020
After trashing Bernie Sanders endlessly, WHY do you suppose CNN is scrapping the Iowa Poll? Here, I'll help #ReleaseThePoll. Here's the most recent poll, and I can't IMAGINE why the Turner Industries CNN AT&T .001%er rich crew would want to HIDE this…(psst, Bernie hates greed) https://t.co/ySarB3QBd3 — Christine (@Gumdrop1956) February 2, 2020
CNN has recently seemed to be reporting unfavorably about Sanders for several weeks. They released an article from information leaked by Senator Elizabeth Warren’s campaign that claimed Sanders said a woman couldn’t beat President Trump. Then, they ambushed him at the last debate, asserting that he was lying when he denied the claim.
A big win for Sanders in Iowa could turn this into a three-person race very quickly. Vice President Joe Biden is holding out for South Carolina to be his first big win following expected victories for Sanders in Iowa and Vermont. Meanwhile, billionaire Mike Bloomberg is banking (literally) on Super Tuesday a month after the Iowa caucus. He needs the race to stay close, though, as his real play is for the convention.
Either CNN and the DNC were fortunate that this Buttigieg thing derailed their poll or they orchestrated it. Either way, their efforts to stall Bernie Sanders’ campaign seem to be backfiring. The more they hate on him, the higher his numbers go.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-02--Yes, the 2019 Novel Coronavirus is different and more dangerous than past scares

There are three general narratives being pushed to keep Americans calm about the 2019 Novel Coronavirus .
The first is that there are only 8 cases so far in the United States .
The second is that it ’ s not nearly as deadly as the flu which has killed 8200 so far this season alone .
The third is that officials have taken the proper precautions to keep it from spreading , such as stopping foreign travelers who have been in China in the last two weeks .
All of these are partially true .
The part that should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of emergency-level warnings have not been issued .
In fact , we were given more warnings in the early days of SARS in 2002 , swine flu in 2009 , and Zika in 2016 than we ’ re getting now with the coronavirus .
It ’ s silly to think there are only 8 cases in the United States .
Yet media reports aren ’ t explaining the real risks this virus poses or the reasons it ’ s certain there are many more cases than we ’ re being told , reasons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ less-deadly-than-the-flu ” narrative is especially heinous because it ’ s a disingenuous statistic .
Yes , 8200 have died from flu this season , but that ’ s against 15,000,000 reported cases .
That means only one out of every 1829 cases are fatal .
The coronavirus has an estimated fatality rate of between 2 % -3 % .
This is lower than SARS which had a fatality rate of nearly 10 % , but there ’ s a reason even this statistic makes the 2019 Novel Coronavirus much more dangerous .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ well .
The third “ keep calm ” narrative is both hopeful and concerning .
It ’ s hopeful because it ’ s clear the Trump administration is taking this seriously .
It ’ s concerning because enough has not been done to warn and prepare the population for what ’ s really going on .
This coronavirus has some extremely alarming traits .
It ’ s slow to manifest with incubation rates of up to two weeks .
There ’ s as much as a week from the time the disease becomes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feeling symptoms .
It is an airborne contagion that can infect through the eyes .
All of these traits combine for a recipe of total disaster for any nation , including the United States , that has many travelers to and from China in general and Wuhan in particular .
It ’ s rare for a virus to be contagious when the carriers are asymptomatic for such an extended period of time .
Diseases like this were made to circumvent modern-day preventative measures .
Last week we posted a video showing the real @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rates may be 10x higher than they ’ re reporting .
The communist nation ’ s penchant for secrecy and disinformation make the conspiracy theory estimates seem realistic .
Even if those estimates are exaggerated , they ’ re still terrifying .
But let ’ s not get too wrapped up in conspiracy theories , as the bulk that are floating around now are simply untrue .
Some are saying this was manufactured for population control .
Others are saying it was a bioweapon that was accidentally unleashed on the population .
These @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the reality that it ’ s a virus borne from someone consuming an unclean meat from an animal that is known to carry these types of diseases .
It happened in a highly populated area with many travelers in and out .
There are times when stirring up fears of government conspiracies is necessary .
This is not one of them .
What ’ s important to understand is that Americans must take proper precautions .
These are the same precautions we should be practicing at all times anyway , especially during flu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t touch your eyes , nose , ears , or mouth with unwashed hands .
Limit exposure to contagious surfaces and wash your hands if you do touch them .
Did I mention washing your hands ?
We must address this with increased diligence .
The fact that it spreads so rapidly before symptoms are present is why reports that there are only 8 confirmed cases are misleading .
The death rate being lower than other diseases like SARS is good , but there ’ s a negative side effect as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ getting as sick as quickly , the spread of the disease is much higher .
I ’ m not suggesting it ’ s a bad thing that a lower percentage of people are dying from it , but it does make it easier to spread .
The government needs to start issuing warnings and educating people on proper actions to be taken .
Telling people to wash their hands more often than usual would go a long way to slowing the spread .
The first thing they say when situations like this arise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” 99 times out of 100 , this is great advice .
The 2019 Novel Coronavirus appears to be the 1 in a 100 times when calls for calm are misplaced .
We must take precautions for this one immediately .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join @ @ @ @ @

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
There are three general narratives being pushed to keep Americans calm about the 2019 Novel Coronavirus. The first is that there are only 8 cases so far in the United States. The second is that it’s not nearly as deadly as the flu which has killed 8200 so far this season alone. The third is that officials have taken the proper precautions to keep it from spreading, such as stopping foreign travelers who have been in China in the last two weeks.
All of these are partially true. The part that should scare people is that the conspicuous lack of emergency-level warnings have not been issued. In fact, we were given more warnings in the early days of SARS in 2002, swine flu in 2009, and Zika in 2016 than we’re getting now with the coronavirus.
It’s silly to think there are only 8 cases in the United States. Yet media reports aren’t explaining the real risks this virus poses or the reasons it’s certain there are many more cases than we’re being told, reasons I’ll describe below.
The “less-deadly-than-the-flu” narrative is especially heinous because it’s a disingenuous statistic. Yes, 8200 have died from flu this season, but that’s against 15,000,000 reported cases. That means only one out of every 1829 cases are fatal. The coronavirus has an estimated fatality rate of between 2%-3%. This is lower than SARS which had a fatality rate of nearly 10%, but there’s a reason even this statistic makes the 2019 Novel Coronavirus much more dangerous. I’ll cover that below as well.
The third “keep calm” narrative is both hopeful and concerning. It’s hopeful because it’s clear the Trump administration is taking this seriously. It’s concerning because enough has not been done to warn and prepare the population for what’s really going on.
This coronavirus has some extremely alarming traits. It’s slow to manifest with incubation rates of up to two weeks. There’s as much as a week from the time the disease becomes contagious to the time the carrier starts feeling symptoms. It is an airborne contagion that can infect through the eyes. All of these traits combine for a recipe of total disaster for any nation, including the United States, that has many travelers to and from China in general and Wuhan in particular. It’s rare for a virus to be contagious when the carriers are asymptomatic for such an extended period of time. Diseases like this were made to circumvent modern-day preventative measures.
Last week we posted a video showing the real numbers at that point of Chinese infection rates may be 10x higher than they’re reporting. The communist nation’s penchant for secrecy and disinformation make the conspiracy theory estimates seem realistic. Even if those estimates are exaggerated, they’re still terrifying.
But let’s not get too wrapped up in conspiracy theories, as the bulk that are floating around now are simply untrue. Some are saying this was manufactured for population control. Others are saying it was a bioweapon that was accidentally unleashed on the population. These and other conspiracy theories are distractions from the reality that it’s a virus borne from someone consuming an unclean meat from an animal that is known to carry these types of diseases. It happened in a highly populated area with many travelers in and out. There are times when stirring up fears of government conspiracies is necessary. This is not one of them.
What’s important to understand is that Americans must take proper precautions. These are the same precautions we should be practicing at all times anyway, especially during flu season. Wash your hands. Don’t touch your eyes, nose, ears, or mouth with unwashed hands. Limit exposure to contagious surfaces and wash your hands if you do touch them. Did I mention washing your hands?
We must address this with increased diligence. The fact that it spreads so rapidly before symptoms are present is why reports that there are only 8 confirmed cases are misleading. The death rate being lower than other diseases like SARS is good, but there’s a negative side effect as a result. Since people aren’t getting as sick as quickly, the spread of the disease is much higher. I’m not suggesting it’s a bad thing that a lower percentage of people are dying from it, but it does make it easier to spread. The government needs to start issuing warnings and educating people on proper actions to be taken. Telling people to wash their hands more often than usual would go a long way to slowing the spread.
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.
The first thing they say when situations like this arise is, “Don’t panic.” 99 times out of 100, this is great advice. The 2019 Novel Coronavirus appears to be the 1 in a 100 times when calls for calm are misplaced. We must take precautions for this one immediately.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-02--Michael Moore is a bit perturbed at Michael Bloomberg and the DNC

There are few spectacles more entertaining to conservatives than watching Michael Moore whine about things .
He ’ s become very good at doing so during the Trump era , though usually not as vulgarly and loudly as he did at a recent campaign event for Senator Bernie Sanders in Iowa .
This time , the hyper-leftist documentary maker wasn ’ t upset with Republicans .
It was the Democratic National Committee and billionaire candidate Mike Bloomberg who drew his ire .
On Friday , the DNC announced changes to the requirements to reach the debate stage in Las Vegas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Bloomberg isn ’ t accepting donations , instead relying on his $ 53 billion net worth to fund his campaign .
Moore was livid , cursing his anger out to the crowd before chuckling .
“ There are TV cameras here , ” he seemed to realize after dropping an F-bomb .
For once , he made a great point .
That doesn ’ t make his unhinged rage any less hilarious .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
There are few spectacles more entertaining to conservatives than watching Michael Moore whine about things. He’s become very good at doing so during the Trump era, though usually not as vulgarly and loudly as he did at a recent campaign event for Senator Bernie Sanders in Iowa.
This time, the hyper-leftist documentary maker wasn’t upset with Republicans. It was the Democratic National Committee and billionaire candidate Mike Bloomberg who drew his ire. On Friday, the DNC announced changes to the requirements to reach the debate stage in Las Vegas next month, eliminating the donor requirement. Bloomberg isn’t accepting donations, instead relying on his $53 billion net worth to fund his campaign.
Moore was livid, cursing his anger out to the crowd before chuckling. “There are TV cameras here,” he seemed to realize after dropping an F-bomb. For once, he made a great point. That doesn’t make his unhinged rage any less hilarious.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-02--The right impeachment message was (and is) available for President Trump

Donald Trump set the tone for his defense when he said “ I did nothing wrong.
” That ’ s true , but the word “ wrong ” is a dark word that attaches to the President .
It put him in a defensive posture that was doomed to give the Democrats an opening to impeach him .
This tone continued all through the public wrangling and even the “ trial ” in the Senate .
We had Alan Dershowitz presenting a legal tour-de-force on why the Constitution requires either a crime or an act of otherwise manifestly criminal character @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Obstruction of Congress ” is pure B***S*** because the House gave up its legal options to force testimony in a headlong rush to beat the election clock .
And , of course , there was the strange admission by Representative Green that “ If we don ’ t impeach him , he ’ ll be re-elected.
” None of this presented Trump in a good light .
And for one that Scott Adams ( creator of “ Dilbert ” and author of Win Bigly ) considers to be a “ master persuader @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
How was it that the President missed a chance to execute the “ high ground maneuver ?
” The “ high ground maneuver ” is a rhetorical flourish where the recipient of a verbal attack agrees with the attacker , and then raises the stakes by making a stronger case in a way that supports the one originally attacked .
In poker terms this would be , “ I see your bluff and raise you.
” When Princess Pelosi declared that the Constitution says that the President is to “ take care @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Donald Trump should have jumped in with both feet .
He might have said it like this .
“ I welcome the Speaker ’ s call for me to follow the Constitution ’ s “ take care ” clause ( Art 2 , Sec 3 ) .
For far too long , Presidents have ignored their responsibility to root out corruption .
Former VP Biden ’ s brag about extorting Ukraine to fire a prosecutor investigating a company where his son sits on the Board is likely just the tip of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other corrupt practices involving US persons that must be investigated .
To this end , I called on President Zelenskiy to honor our 1998 Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters by investigating corruption .
The Bidens were mentioned only as the most public case of likely corruption .
There are many others .
“ I do not undertake this lightly .
The burden imposed on the President by the “ take care clause ” is heavy .
It makes me the chief law enforcement officer of the United States .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ political families being part of corrupt practices in Ukraine , including members of both parties .
It is essential that we investigate fully in order to identify the guilty and clear the innocent .
Ukraine ’ s participation in this project is essential and required by our treaty .
Until our investigation is complete , we must not reveal any details , because premature reports could harm people who haven ’ t done anything illegal .
But once we have solid information , you may rest assured that we will prosecute anyone we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have instructed my chief deputy in this , the Attorney General , to vigorously pursue the truth as far and in whatever direction it leads until we are certain that all guilty persons have been prosecuted and all innocent people have been cleared .
No one will be exempt , regardless of heritage , wealth , or political status .
As the Speaker notes , “ no one is above the law.
” Imagine what would have happened .
The Democrats would have screamed about Trump ’ s call , but instantly he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the chief law enforcement officer of the US , his call for an investigation is clearly what he is required to do .
If the Democrats complain , they are objecting to him doing exactly what the Constitution calls on him to do .
Democrats claim they are protecting the Constitution .
But suddenly the high ground maneuver has put them in the position of attacking the Constitution .
We expect this in the arguments about the Electoral College and the Right to Keep and Bear Arms .
But at least there the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In Ukraine , they can ’ t make that claim , and the impeachment push would be completely changed .
As long as Trump stays on message , the public will see that the Democrats have no case .
What we got was the classic counterpuncher .
Democrats accused Trump of seeking foreign interference in the upcoming election .
He missed the high ground , and found himself mounting a vigorous defense .
He was Constitutionally correct in his defense , but optically deficient .
It became the political equivalent of “ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we know how well that works .
Editor ’ s note : This article was written about what the President should have done , but I believe the window of opportunity is still available at the upcoming State of the Union .
Speechwriters at the White House , please take note .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Donald Trump set the tone for his defense when he said “I did nothing wrong.” That’s true, but the word “wrong” is a dark word that attaches to the President. It put him in a defensive posture that was doomed to give the Democrats an opening to impeach him.
This tone continued all through the public wrangling and even the “trial” in the Senate. We had Alan Dershowitz presenting a legal tour-de-force on why the Constitution requires either a crime or an act of otherwise manifestly criminal character for impeachment. There were arguments that “Obstruction of Congress” is pure B***S*** because the House gave up its legal options to force testimony in a headlong rush to beat the election clock. And, of course, there was the strange admission by Representative Green that “If we don’t impeach him, he’ll be re-elected.”
None of this presented Trump in a good light. And for one that Scott Adams (creator of “Dilbert” and author of Win Bigly) considers to be a “master persuader,” it’s almost inexcusable. How was it that the President missed a chance to execute the “high ground maneuver?”
The “high ground maneuver” is a rhetorical flourish where the recipient of a verbal attack agrees with the attacker, and then raises the stakes by making a stronger case in a way that supports the one originally attacked. In poker terms this would be, “I see your bluff and raise you.”
When Princess Pelosi declared that the Constitution says that the President is to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” Donald Trump should have jumped in with both feet. He might have said it like this.
“I welcome the Speaker’s call for me to follow the Constitution’s “take care” clause (Art 2, Sec 3). For far too long, Presidents have ignored their responsibility to root out corruption. Former VP Biden’s brag about extorting Ukraine to fire a prosecutor investigating a company where his son sits on the Board is likely just the tip of the iceberg. We have numerous reports of other corrupt practices involving US persons that must be investigated. To this end, I called on President Zelenskiy to honor our 1998 Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters by investigating corruption. The Bidens were mentioned only as the most public case of likely corruption. There are many others. “I do not undertake this lightly. The burden imposed on the President by the “take care clause” is heavy. It makes me the chief law enforcement officer of the United States. “We have received many reports of US political families being part of corrupt practices in Ukraine, including members of both parties. It is essential that we investigate fully in order to identify the guilty and clear the innocent. Ukraine’s participation in this project is essential and required by our treaty. Until our investigation is complete, we must not reveal any details, because premature reports could harm people who haven’t done anything illegal. But once we have solid information, you may rest assured that we will prosecute anyone we find committed illegal acts. “I have instructed my chief deputy in this, the Attorney General, to vigorously pursue the truth as far and in whatever direction it leads until we are certain that all guilty persons have been prosecuted and all innocent people have been cleared. No one will be exempt, regardless of heritage, wealth, or political status. As the Speaker notes, “no one is above the law.”
Imagine what would have happened. The Democrats would have screamed about Trump’s call, but instantly he would have turned the tables. As the chief law enforcement officer of the US, his call for an investigation is clearly what he is required to do. If the Democrats complain, they are objecting to him doing exactly what the Constitution calls on him to do.
Democrats claim they are protecting the Constitution. But suddenly the high ground maneuver has put them in the position of attacking the Constitution. We expect this in the arguments about the Electoral College and the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. But at least there the argument is about changing the Constitution. In Ukraine, they can’t make that claim, and the impeachment push would be completely changed. As long as Trump stays on message, the public will see that the Democrats have no case.
What we got was the classic counterpuncher. Democrats accused Trump of seeking foreign interference in the upcoming election. He missed the high ground, and found himself mounting a vigorous defense. He was Constitutionally correct in his defense, but optically deficient. It became the political equivalent of “I am not a liar!” And we know how well that works.
Editor’s note: This article was written about what the President should have done, but I believe the window of opportunity is still available at the upcoming State of the Union. Speechwriters at the White House, please take note.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]
Dr. Joseph Mercola said, “Synthetic meat is the epitome of ultraprocessed food, and it seems naïve to think it won’t have health effects similar to other ultraprocessed junk foods.” For All-American REAL beef raised in pastures, sous vide, then freeze-dried for long-term storage, visit Whole Cows and use promo code “no junk” at checkout.