noqreport--2020-01-23--Jailed for Tweets: UMN student Luo Daiqing is experiencing the totalitarian insanity of China

In the United States , we often lament the censorship that is committed by Big Tech companies like Twitter , Facebook , and Google .
But our concerns are infinitesimal compared to the suppression of thought and Draconian policies the people of China face .
University of Minnesota student Luo Daiqing is learning about this first-hand after being sentenced to six months in prison over unflattering Tweets about Chinese President Xi Jinping .
While studying in the U.S. , Luo created a Twitter account that has since been deleted .
Was he Tweeting manifestos opposing communism or calls for revolution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and cartoons that weren ’ t flattering to President .
Here are a couple of the things he retweeted : Lest we forget , Twitter is blocked in China .
While it ’ s true that many circumvent the block , the number of Chinese citizens who may have seen Luo ’ s Tweets is tiny .
He isn ’ t a public figure or a popular opposition personality .
He ’ s a young adult who was studying in the United States and Tweeting nothing of major consequence .
For that , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serve a six-month term , forever labeled as a felon in his homeland .
One of his biggest crimes , as noted in court documents , was the Tweet above that morphed Winnie the Pooh into a Xi version .
Winnie the Pooh is not welcome in Communist China .
The Chinese Communist Party ought to release Luo Daiqing immediately , and the University of Minnesota ought to give him a full-ride scholarship .
Don ’ t forget that the Chinese Communist Party has banned Twitter , so the only people who even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with monitoring Chinese citizens while they ’ re enjoying freedom here in the United States .
This is what ruthless and paranoid totalitarianism looks like .
China ’ s implementation of their social credit score , which is creeping its way around the world and into the United States , combined with the party ’ s renewed insistence on keeping the population submissive mean anything that is perceived by the party as critical will likely result in prosecution and prison time .
As Axios noted , Luo ’ s case represents a broadening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ laws .
A University of Minnesota student has been arrested in China and sentenced to six months in prison for tweets he posted while in the United States , according to a Chinese court document viewed by Axios .
Some of the tweets contained images deemed to be unflattering portrayals of a “ national leader.
” Why it matters : The case represents a dramatic escalation of the Chinese government ’ s attempts to shut down free speech abroad , and a global expansion of a Chinese police campaign a year ago to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ posted content critical of the Chinese government .
People like Mike Bloomberg , Lebron James , and other China apologists will remain silent about the Communist Party ’ s actions .
Be wary of those who refuse to see that China ’ s policies oppose freedom of thought , as they may want to bring those policies here .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
In the United States, we often lament the censorship that is committed by Big Tech companies like Twitter, Facebook, and Google. But our concerns are infinitesimal compared to the suppression of thought and Draconian policies the people of China face. University of Minnesota student Luo Daiqing is learning about this first-hand after being sentenced to six months in prison over unflattering Tweets about Chinese President Xi Jinping.
While studying in the U.S., Luo created a Twitter account that has since been deleted. Was he Tweeting manifestos opposing communism or calls for revolution? No. He was Tweeting memes and cartoons that weren’t flattering to President. Here are a couple of the things he retweeted:
Lest we forget, Twitter is blocked in China. While it’s true that many circumvent the block, the number of Chinese citizens who may have seen Luo’s Tweets is tiny. He isn’t a public figure or a popular opposition personality. He’s a young adult who was studying in the United States and Tweeting nothing of major consequence. For that, he was incarcerated and will continue to serve a six-month term, forever labeled as a felon in his homeland. One of his biggest crimes, as noted in court documents, was the Tweet above that morphed Winnie the Pooh into a Xi version. Winnie the Pooh is not welcome in Communist China.
Senator Ben Sasse called for his release:
The Chinese Communist Party ought to release Luo Daiqing immediately, and the University of Minnesota ought to give him a full-ride scholarship. Don’t forget that the Chinese Communist Party has banned Twitter, so the only people who even saw these tweets were the goons charged with monitoring Chinese citizens while they’re enjoying freedom here in the United States. This is what ruthless and paranoid totalitarianism looks like.
Outrageous. Arrested there for tweets here.
The USG must do a better job of explaining v explicitly the dangers the CCP poses to Americans. https://t.co/EKISuGDlAq — Rebeccah Heinrichs (@RLHeinrichs) January 23, 2020
#china escalates its efforts to shut down free speech in America https://t.co/LFMwbEPIeY — Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) January 23, 2020
China’s implementation of their social credit score, which is creeping its way around the world and into the United States, combined with the party’s renewed insistence on keeping the population submissive mean anything that is perceived by the party as critical will likely result in prosecution and prison time. As Axios noted, Luo’s case represents a broadening of their enforcement of their new totalitarian laws.
A University of Minnesota student has been arrested in China and sentenced to six months in prison for tweets he posted while in the United States, according to a Chinese court document viewed by Axios. Some of the tweets contained images deemed to be unflattering portrayals of a “national leader.” Why it matters: The case represents a dramatic escalation of the Chinese government’s attempts to shut down free speech abroad, and a global expansion of a Chinese police campaign a year ago to track down Twitter users in China who posted content critical of the Chinese government.
People like Mike Bloomberg, Lebron James, and other China apologists will remain silent about the Communist Party’s actions. Be wary of those who refuse to see that China’s policies oppose freedom of thought, as they may want to bring those policies here.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-23--CNN’s Joe Lockhart makes up Senate GOP ‘convo.’ Conservatives bring down the hammer.

CNN political analyst Joe Lockhart had a viral Tweet today .
To many of the thousands who liked and retweeted him , the conversation he pretended to overhear from Senate Republicans at the impeachment trial represented their delusional hope .
It was a scathing rebuke of the echo chamber the left often believes Republicans exist in to perpetuate their conservative worldview .
The Tweet immediately took off as those cheering on the House Democrats today in the Senate read his post and believed it .
Never mind that it was as far-fetched as a Monty Python storyline .
They believed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They suspended disbelief willfully in hopes that their ultimate goal – the removal of President Trump from office – could actually be happening .
It was , of course , fake .
Lockhart admitted it 9 minutes later , an eternity in Twitter time .
At that point it had already triggered Twitter ’ s amplification algorithm and was being presented in tens of thousands of feeds .
The original Tweet is currently at 5,000 retweets .
The admission that it was fake is under 500 .
Here ’ s the biggest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ People will take him seriously .
It ’ s a common tactic used almost exclusively by the left to make false , outrageous statements to get maximum exposure , then retract or correct them later , at which point the correction gets next to zero exposure .
Lockhart took the “ just kidding ” route .
It ’ s this type of despicable move that reinforces our contention that most mainstream media outlets really are just fake news .
In fact , his false satire was called out by the undisputed kings of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ What Joe Lockhart did was a microcosm of how mainstream media operates today .
Fake news is ugly in all of its forms , but Lockhart ’ s maneuver is exceptionally disgraceful .
Nevertheless , he ’ ll feel no shame .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please @ @ @ @ @ @

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
CNN political analyst Joe Lockhart had a viral Tweet today. To many of the thousands who liked and retweeted him, the conversation he pretended to overhear from Senate Republicans at the impeachment trial represented their delusional hope. It was a scathing rebuke of the echo chamber the left often believes Republicans exist in to perpetuate their conservative worldview.
Overheard convo between two Republican Senators who only watch Fox News. "is this stuff real? I haven't heard any of this before. I thought it was all about a server. If half the stuff Schiff is saying is true, we're up shit's creek. Hope the White House has exculpatory evidence — Joe Lockhart (@joelockhart) January 22, 2020
The Tweet immediately took off as those cheering on the House Democrats today in the Senate read his post and believed it. Never mind that it was as far-fetched as a Monty Python storyline. They believed it because they wanted to believe it. They suspended disbelief willfully in hopes that their ultimate goal – the removal of President Trump from office – could actually be happening.
It was, of course, fake. Lockhart admitted it 9 minutes later, an eternity in Twitter time. At that point it had already triggered Twitter’s amplification algorithm and was being presented in tens of thousands of feeds. The original Tweet is currently at 5,000 retweets. The admission that it was fake is under 500.
Conservatives on Twitter reacted harshly.
Did I tell you the one about the CNN analyst who spread a false narrative, watched it go viral, then waited 10 minutes to admit he made it all up? This is the bullshit that discredits news organizations. — Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) January 22, 2020
Of course Jennifer Rubin retweeted this. She's the Queen of Fake news. — Mark Dice (@MarkDice) January 22, 2020
And then you tweeted you made this up.
Question: Why do you people get upset when we call you #FakeNews & you poll lower than Congress? It’s really weird when you question AMERICANS when we get upset about lies? — SeldenGADawgs (@SeldenGADawgs) January 22, 2020
If you gave a crap that people took it seriously and had an ounce of integrity you’d delete it — Sara Gonzales (@SaraGonzalesTX) January 22, 2020
Here’s the biggest problem with fake news like this. People will take him seriously. It’s a common tactic used almost exclusively by the left to make false, outrageous statements to get maximum exposure, then retract or correct them later, at which point the correction gets next to zero exposure. Lockhart took the “just kidding” route. It’s this type of despicable move that reinforces our contention that most mainstream media outlets really are just fake news. In fact, his false satire was called out by the undisputed kings of conservative satire, the Babylon Bee.
Leave the satire to us; we'll leave the fake news to you. — The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) January 22, 2020
What Joe Lockhart did was a microcosm of how mainstream media operates today. Fake news is ugly in all of its forms, but Lockhart’s maneuver is exceptionally disgraceful. Nevertheless, he’ll feel no shame.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-22--Will someone please take Lolo Jones on a date?

Hurdler .
Bobsledder .
Christian .
37-year-old virgin .
Olympian Lolo Jones is a very rare person in a society that promotes promiscuity and premarital sex .
Now , she ’ s regretting her decision to go public with her chastity .
“ That was a mistake , ” Jones said .
“ That killed all my dates after that .
Didn ’ t even have a chance , before I at least had a chance.
” Jones , who has been candid about her decision to remain abstinent until marriage , also disclosed her previous plan of action when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Before I ’ d tiptoe , like , ‘ OK , when is a good time to tell him ?
Do I wait until he sees my personality a little bit , or do I just drop the bomb ?
’ ” she said .
It may not be my place to say this , but I ’ m so proud of her .
Even as she struggles with her love life , she ’ s doing so knowing the right person will come along .
It ’ s impossible for him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and renown .
She just has to be patient .
As a Christian , stories like Lolo Jones ’ are inspiring .
It gives us hope that the debauchery and false gods so prevalent in American society can not latch onto us all .
Our nation needs inspiring people like Jones as role models for our children .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Hurdler. Bobsledder. Christian. 37-year-old virgin. Olympian Lolo Jones is a very rare person in a society that promotes promiscuity and premarital sex. Now, she’s regretting her decision to go public with her chastity.
Lolo Jones’ candid virginity talk has backfired on dates “That was a mistake,” Jones said. “That killed all my dates after that. Didn’t even have a chance, before I at least had a chance.” Jones, who has been candid about her decision to remain abstinent until marriage, also disclosed her previous plan of action when it came to sharing private information. “Before I’d tiptoe, like, ‘OK, when is a good time to tell him? Do I wait until he sees my personality a little bit, or do I just drop the bomb?’” she said.
It may not be my place to say this, but I’m so proud of her. Even as she struggles with her love life, she’s doing so knowing the right person will come along. It’s impossible for him not to considering her beauty, faith, and renown. She just has to be patient.
As a Christian, stories like Lolo Jones’ are inspiring. It gives us hope that the debauchery and false gods so prevalent in American society cannot latch onto us all. Our nation needs inspiring people like Jones as role models for our children.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-22--Impeachment analysis: Adam Schiff is still a liar

“ Bluster and showmanship.
” That ’ s what a progressive pundit told me during the House impeachment inquiry to justify why House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff was playing hardball against both fellow Republicans in the House as well as the President ’ s counsel .
“ It ’ s his show for now , but he ’ ll switch to the facts alone once he ’ s a House Manager , and I assure you he will be.
” My friend was correct .
Schiff was chosen as one of the House Managers for the Senate trial .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and possibly why she ’ s suddenly not answering any of my texts – was in her assertion that as a House Manager , Schiff would turn on “ attorney mode , ” as she put it , to deliver an evidential argument for President Trump to be removed from office .
Schiff would stop quoting hearsay testimony as first-hand knowledge , she said .
No , he hasn ’ t .
Schiff would work under the Constitutional presumption of innocence while trying to prove President Trump guilty , she said .
Again @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But the most significant inaccuracy in my progressive friend ’ s prognostications was that Schiff would stop lying .
He absolutely , positively hasn ’ t stopped doing that .
In fact , he seems to be doubling down in front of the Senate .
Or , to be more explanatory of the actual situation , Schiff is doubling down in front of the wider television audience he ’ s currently enjoying on Day 2 of the impeachment trial .
Whether he ’ s lying about Lev Parnas and the so-called “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who Schiff still claims he ’ s never even met , or Gordon Sondland ’ s testimony which unambiguously stated he never heard that the President made the Ukrainian aid conditional on a quid pro quo , Schiff is boldly lying directly to the American people .
The Senate is just there as a live studio audience .
That last lie is telling because in Schiff ’ s opening arguments today , he invoked Sondland repeatedly .
Another important lie is that Schiff continues to pretend like the House impeachment process was fair @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This , folks , is projection .
The President ’ s counsel wasn ’ t allowed to participate until the final seven days of a 78-day process .
By the time they were even allowed to see evidence , the fact-finding process had concluded .
The President ’ s team was only allowed to participate in the House Judiciary Committee ’ s portion in which legal scholars , not so-called fact-witnesses , were called to testify .
None of this is about impeachment .
Not really .
Impeachment is the backdrop for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against the President .
That ’ s it .
Nothing more .
There ’ s an old joke that goes , “ How can you tell when Adam Schiff is lying ?
His lips are moving.
” We can add an addendum to the joke after watching the impeachment debacle so far .
How do you know a process is corrupt ?
Adam Schiff is involved .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
“Bluster and showmanship.” That’s what a progressive pundit told me during the House impeachment inquiry to justify why House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff was playing hardball against both fellow Republicans in the House as well as the President’s counsel. “It’s his show for now, but he’ll switch to the facts alone once he’s a House Manager, and I assure you he will be.”
My friend was correct. Schiff was chosen as one of the House Managers for the Senate trial. But where she was clearly mistaken – and possibly why she’s suddenly not answering any of my texts – was in her assertion that as a House Manager, Schiff would turn on “attorney mode,” as she put it, to deliver an evidential argument for President Trump to be removed from office.
Schiff would stop quoting hearsay testimony as first-hand knowledge, she said. No, he hasn’t. Schiff would work under the Constitutional presumption of innocence while trying to prove President Trump guilty, she said. Again, no, he’s not. But the most significant inaccuracy in my progressive friend’s prognostications was that Schiff would stop lying. He absolutely, positively hasn’t stopped doing that. In fact, he seems to be doubling down in front of the Senate.
Or, to be more explanatory of the actual situation, Schiff is doubling down in front of the wider television audience he’s currently enjoying on Day 2 of the impeachment trial.
Whether he’s lying about Lev Parnas and the so-called “wrong Mr. Z,” the whistleblower who Schiff still claims he’s never even met, or Gordon Sondland’s testimony which unambiguously stated he never heard that the President made the Ukrainian aid conditional on a quid pro quo, Schiff is boldly lying directly to the American people. The Senate is just there as a live studio audience. That last lie is telling because in Schiff’s opening arguments today, he invoked Sondland repeatedly.
Another important lie is that Schiff continues to pretend like the House impeachment process was fair while the Senate’s is not. This, folks, is projection. The President’s counsel wasn’t allowed to participate until the final seven days of a 78-day process. By the time they were even allowed to see evidence, the fact-finding process had concluded. The President’s team was only allowed to participate in the House Judiciary Committee’s portion in which legal scholars, not so-called fact-witnesses, were called to testify.
None of this is about impeachment. Not really. Impeachment is the backdrop for Democrats to make a 2020 election case against the President. That’s it. Nothing more.
There’s an old joke that goes, “How can you tell when Adam Schiff is lying? His lips are moving.” We can add an addendum to the joke after watching the impeachment debacle so far. How do you know a process is corrupt? Adam Schiff is involved.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-23--Seattle shooting suspects Marquise Tolbert, William Ray Tolliver have 65 arrests, 35 convictions bet

Seattle shooting suspects Marquise Tolbert, William Ray Tolliver have 65 arrests, 35 convictions between them

There was a mass shooting in Seattle yesterday that hasn ’ t received a lot of attention from mainstream media , gun control activists , or Democrats in general .
The reason for this is clear : It doesn ’ t have the right narratives or check any of the right boxes for the breathless outrage that normally follows a mass shooting of this magnitude .
Marquise Tolbert and William Ray Tolliver , both 24 , engaged in a bizarre series of events at the high-crime area of 3rd and Pine .
They were apparently walking together towards a McDonald @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Then , they pulled guns and , according to witnesses , engaged in a gun battle with each other .
One woman was killed an seven others were injured , including a 9-year-old .
Then , the two were seen running into the transit tunnel together .
Both are still at large .
The suspects each had warrants for their arrest even before the shooting .
One has been arrested at least 44 times with at least 20 criminal convictions .
The other has at least 21 arrests and 15 convictions .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ law enforcement ’ s ability to enforce the laws , has become a hub for violence despite Washington being one of the top 10 highest-rated gun control states according to pro-gun-control group Giffords Law Center .
Why has this bloody , disturbing mass shooting barely cracked into the national news cycle ?
It misses all of the narratives gun control advocates love .
• Both had lengthy criminal records .
Gun control advocates want previously law-abiding citizens to prove their points .
• It occurred in a gun-free zone in the mass transit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refuse to believe gun-free zones don ’ t work .
• As felons , both suspects were already prohibited from owning or carrying firearms .
Gun control advocates do not like stories proving that gun control doesn ’ t work .
• All eight victims appear to have been caught in a crossfire of a dispute instead of being targeted following a racist social media post or a manifesto being published online .
Gun control advocates like manifestos .
Two Black men with long rap sheets took illegally acquired firearms into a gun-free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far-left Democrat-controlled city and opened fire , defying all gun control laws .
No wonder mainstream media won ’ t touch this story .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
There was a mass shooting in Seattle yesterday that hasn’t received a lot of attention from mainstream media, gun control activists, or Democrats in general. The reason for this is clear: It doesn’t have the right narratives or check any of the right boxes for the breathless outrage that normally follows a mass shooting of this magnitude.
Marquise Tolbert and William Ray Tolliver, both 24, engaged in a bizarre series of events at the high-crime area of 3rd and Pine. They were apparently walking together towards a McDonald’s on the corner while arguing. Then, they pulled guns and, according to witnesses, engaged in a gun battle with each other. One woman was killed an seven others were injured, including a 9-year-old. Then, the two were seen running into the transit tunnel together. Both are still at large.
3RD AND PINE UPDATE: Detectives have identified two suspects in yesterday's shooting. Marquise Latrelle Tolbert (age 24, 6'1" 200 lbs) and William Ray Tolliver (age 24, 6'0" 145 lbs). Both men are considered armed and dangerous. Call 911 if you see them or know where they are. pic.twitter.com/vgg7Uez3zN — Seattle Police Dept. (@SeattlePD) January 23, 2020
The suspects each had warrants for their arrest even before the shooting. One has been arrested at least 44 times with at least 20 criminal convictions. The other has at least 21 arrests and 15 convictions. Seattle, known for laws that hamper law enforcement’s ability to enforce the laws, has become a hub for violence despite Washington being one of the top 10 highest-rated gun control states according to pro-gun-control group Giffords Law Center.
Why has this bloody, disturbing mass shooting barely cracked into the national news cycle? It misses all of the narratives gun control advocates love.
The suspects are Black. Gun control advocates prefer Caucasian suspects.
Both had lengthy criminal records. Gun control advocates want previously law-abiding citizens to prove their points.
It occurred in a gun-free zone in the mass transit section of downtown. Gun control advocates refuse to believe gun-free zones don’t work.
As felons, both suspects were already prohibited from owning or carrying firearms. Gun control advocates do not like stories proving that gun control doesn’t work.
All eight victims appear to have been caught in a crossfire of a dispute instead of being targeted following a racist social media post or a manifesto being published online. Gun control advocates like manifestos.
Two Black men with long rap sheets took illegally acquired firearms into a gun-free zone in a high-crime district within a far-left Democrat-controlled city and opened fire, defying all gun control laws. No wonder mainstream media won’t touch this story.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-23--Unpacking Laura Ingraham’s bombshell report on Eric Ciaramella, the Bidens, and Ken Vogel

There ’ s blowback that comes from invoking the name of the alleged Ukrainian whistleblower , Eric Ciaramella .
Doing so will get you silenced by YouTube , banned by Facebook , fired from Fox News , or scolded by Adam Schiff .
At NOQ Report , we believe the truth is the truth .
Hiding it only diminishes discourse ; in today ’ s contentious political atmosphere , discourse is the last thing that needs to be diminished .
Fox News host Laura Ingraham delivered a blockbuster segment that brought old conspiracy theories into the realm of verified facts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden , Burisma , Ukrainian officials , and a suppressed NY Times story .
And at the center of it all is Ciaramella who is quickly proving to be much more than a guy who ( allegedly ) blew the whistle about Ukraine .
It would seem he ’ s been involved since well before President Trump ever spoke to Ukrainian President Zelensky , which lends credence to my speculation that his complaint is as much ( or more ) about protecting himself as it is about protecting Joe Biden and taking down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ report by Ingraham followed by analysis : Ingraham , like all Fox News employees , is forbidden from even saying Eric Ciaramella ’ s name .
Her segment was still easy to follow , but here ’ s a breakdown with commentary about what was revealed , and we ’ ll even insert the appropriate name .
A White House meeting that Ciaramella may have had a hand in setting up on January 19 , 2016 , included Ukrainian prosecutors .
They wanted to move forward with investigations into Burisma , the energy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ son , Hunter , on their board .
According to White House logs , Ciaramella signed in several who likely attended the meeting , including Jeffrey Cole , Anna Iemelianova , Nazar Kholodnitsky , Catherine Newcombe , Svitlana Pardus , David Sakvarelidze , Artem Sytnyk , Andriy Telizhenko , and Andris Razans .
NY Times reporter Ken Vogel , who has long-said there is more to the Burisma-Biden story than we ’ re being told , inquired with the Department of Justice regarding the meeting .
In the email , Vogel wrote , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ State Department official ] Elizabeth Zentos attended a meeting at the White House on 1/19/2016 with Ukrainian prosecutors and embassy officials as well as … Eric Ciaramella from the NSC … the subjects discussed included efforts within the United State government to support prosecutions , in Ukraine and the United Kingdom , of Burisma Holdings , … and concerns that Hunter Biden ’ s position with the company could complicate such efforts.
” But the story never ran .
Whatever Vogel had discovered , it either turned out to be nothing ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stating , “ We are going to report that… ” ) or it was quashed by the editors .
The email was sent a week after Joe Biden had announced he was running for president .
Vogel has not answered our request for comment thus far .
Democrats in the impeachment hearing are currently arguing that the reason former Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin was fired under pressure from then-VP Joe Biden is because he was not investigating Burisma and was therefore corrupt .
But their argument is disingenuous as subsequent people who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Burisma .
When we consider Ingraham ’ s report into the equation , two things become clear : The Democrats ’ Burisma narrative is failing and Eric Ciaramella was deeply involved outside of being the whistleblower .
Whether Ciaramella is the whistleblower or not ( he is ) , this new information makes it crystal clear that he needs to testify about the Ukraine coverup , whether as a fact-witness for the impeachment trial or by a Senate committee .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
There’s blowback that comes from invoking the name of the alleged Ukrainian whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella. Doing so will get you silenced by YouTube, banned by Facebook, fired from Fox News, or scolded by Adam Schiff. At NOQ Report, we believe the truth is the truth. Hiding it only diminishes discourse; in today’s contentious political atmosphere, discourse is the last thing that needs to be diminished.
Fox News host Laura Ingraham delivered a blockbuster segment that brought old conspiracy theories into the realm of verified facts surrounding the Obama White House, Hunter Biden, Burisma, Ukrainian officials, and a suppressed NY Times story. And at the center of it all is Ciaramella who is quickly proving to be much more than a guy who (allegedly) blew the whistle about Ukraine. It would seem he’s been involved since well before President Trump ever spoke to Ukrainian President Zelensky, which lends credence to my speculation that his complaint is as much (or more) about protecting himself as it is about protecting Joe Biden and taking down President Trump. Here’s the report by Ingraham followed by analysis:
Ingraham, like all Fox News employees, is forbidden from even saying Eric Ciaramella’s name. Her segment was still easy to follow, but here’s a breakdown with commentary about what was revealed, and we’ll even insert the appropriate name.
A White House meeting that Ciaramella may have had a hand in setting up on January 19, 2016, included Ukrainian prosecutors. They wanted to move forward with investigations into Burisma, the energy company that had Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, on their board. According to White House logs, Ciaramella signed in several who likely attended the meeting, including Jeffrey Cole, Anna Iemelianova, Nazar Kholodnitsky, Catherine Newcombe, Svitlana Pardus, David Sakvarelidze, Artem Sytnyk, Andriy Telizhenko, and Andris Razans.
NY Times reporter Ken Vogel, who has long-said there is more to the Burisma-Biden story than we’re being told, inquired with the Department of Justice regarding the meeting.
In the email, Vogel wrote, “We are going to report that [State Department official] Elizabeth Zentos attended a meeting at the White House on 1/19/2016 with Ukrainian prosecutors and embassy officials as well as … Eric Ciaramella from the NSC … the subjects discussed included efforts within the United State government to support prosecutions, in Ukraine and the United Kingdom, of Burisma Holdings, … and concerns that Hunter Biden’s position with the company could complicate such efforts.”
But the story never ran. Whatever Vogel had discovered, it either turned out to be nothing (unlikely since he started the email by stating, “We are going to report that…”) or it was quashed by the editors. The email was sent a week after Joe Biden had announced he was running for president. Vogel has not answered our request for comment thus far.
Democrats in the impeachment hearing are currently arguing that the reason former Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin was fired under pressure from then-VP Joe Biden is because he was not investigating Burisma and was therefore corrupt. But their argument is disingenuous as subsequent people who filled his role also declined to investigate Burisma. When we consider Ingraham’s report into the equation, two things become clear: The Democrats’ Burisma narrative is failing and Eric Ciaramella was deeply involved outside of being the whistleblower.
Whether Ciaramella is the whistleblower or not (he is), this new information makes it crystal clear that he needs to testify about the Ukraine coverup, whether as a fact-witness for the impeachment trial or by a Senate committee.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com


noqreport--2020-01-23--Why Thomas Massie’s question obliterates the Democrats’ impeachment case

Representative Thomas Massie ( R-KY ) isn ’ t your stereotypical Republican on Capitol Hill .
He has no problem calling out both sides for their continuous outrageous spending and has voted against legislation his caucus generally supported if it did not meet his limited-government philosophy .
This is why his Conservative Review Liberty Score is 96 % , second highest among lawmakers .
It ’ s also why his perspective on impeachment is so important .
He has made it clear he puts country over party .
Massey has opposed impeachment since the middle of the House hearings when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brought to light by Democrats that rose to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors .
Today , he made a point that has been made before , but perhaps never quite as simply as he did in this Tweet : The similarities between what President Trump ’ s team did and what former Vice President Joe Biden personally did with Ukraine are striking .
Both wanted something they claim was tied to corruption .
Both had a perceived benefit they ’ d receive as a result .
But where things deviate is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden got what he wanted in exchange for allowing funds to flow .
President Trump received nothing and Ukraine still got their aid before the deadline .
• President Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate 2016 election interference and Burisma , the company that had employed Biden ’ s son , Hunter .
Biden wanted the prosecutor who was investigating Burisma fired .
• President Trump ’ s requests were not met .
Biden ’ s were met immediately – in less than six hours by his telling of the story .
• President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s actions .
The investigation into Biden ’ s son ’ s company was ended immediately , preventing prosecutors from looking into corruption that some , including respected investigative journalist John Solomon , have said paid Hunter Biden handsomely .
• Despite the delay , President Trump released the aid to Ukraine within the deadline .
After complying to Biden ’ s demands , Ukraine received their billion-dollar loan guarantee .
The only argument Democrats can make to justify Biden ’ s threat is to say he was doing it strictly because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Prosecutor General that Biden had them fire .
Democrats have to pretend like the tremendous benefit the Biden family received as a result of Shokin ’ s firing was incidental and played absolutely no part in motivating Biden ’ s actions .
They must also pretend like it ’ s common practice for an American administration to call for the firing of a prosecutor in an allied nation who had no direct dealings with U.S. affairs .
It has never happened in the history of the United States , but by their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ordinary .
The fact that Hunter Biden was shielded from a potentially devastating investigation was just a coincidence if Democrats are to be believed .
If the bar of high crimes and misdemeanors has been brought down so low to include President Trump ’ s so-called abuse of power , then Joe Biden should be criminally charged for his similar but fruitful actions in Ukraine .
Instead , he gets a pass .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) isn’t your stereotypical Republican on Capitol Hill. He has no problem calling out both sides for their continuous outrageous spending and has voted against legislation his caucus generally supported if it did not meet his limited-government philosophy. This is why his Conservative Review Liberty Score is 96%, second highest among lawmakers. It’s also why his perspective on impeachment is so important. He has made it clear he puts country over party.
Massey has opposed impeachment since the middle of the House hearings when it became clear there was nothing being brought to light by Democrats that rose to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors. Today, he made a point that has been made before, but perhaps never quite as simply as he did in this Tweet:
If withholding foreign aid is an impeachable offense, why did Joe Biden threaten to do it? — Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 23, 2020
The similarities between what President Trump’s team did and what former Vice President Joe Biden personally did with Ukraine are striking. Both wanted something they claim was tied to corruption. Both had a perceived benefit they’d receive as a result. But where things deviate is in how it all played out. Biden got what he wanted in exchange for allowing funds to flow. President Trump received nothing and Ukraine still got their aid before the deadline.
Let’s break it down point-by-point:
President Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate 2016 election interference and Burisma, the company that had employed Biden’s son, Hunter. Biden wanted the prosecutor who was investigating Burisma fired.
President Trump’s requests were not met. Biden’s were met immediately – in less than six hours by his telling of the story.
President Trump did not receive benefits from Ukraine’s actions. The investigation into Biden’s son’s company was ended immediately, preventing prosecutors from looking into corruption that some, including respected investigative journalist John Solomon, have said paid Hunter Biden handsomely.
Despite the delay, President Trump released the aid to Ukraine within the deadline. After complying to Biden’s demands, Ukraine received their billion-dollar loan guarantee.
The only argument Democrats can make to justify Biden’s threat is to say he was doing it strictly because of the corruption of Viktor Shokin, the Prosecutor General that Biden had them fire. Democrats have to pretend like the tremendous benefit the Biden family received as a result of Shokin’s firing was incidental and played absolutely no part in motivating Biden’s actions.
They must also pretend like it’s common practice for an American administration to call for the firing of a prosecutor in an allied nation who had no direct dealings with U.S. affairs. It has never happened in the history of the United States, but by their reckoning, there was nothing out of the ordinary. The fact that Hunter Biden was shielded from a potentially devastating investigation was just a coincidence if Democrats are to be believed.
If the bar of high crimes and misdemeanors has been brought down so low to include President Trump’s so-called abuse of power, then Joe Biden should be criminally charged for his similar but fruitful actions in Ukraine. Instead, he gets a pass.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-24--Laura Ingraham has advice for insomniacs

The impeachment debacle is going into Day 4 and it ’ s already painful to hear .
House Managers have been presenting their “ case ” for two days and still have another day to continue saying nothing of substance .
That alone is bad enough , but when you consider most of the talking is being done by House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff , the level of discomfort can be doubled .
It isn ’ t just his annoying voice or pedantic rhetoric that makes it sound like white noise .
It ’ s the passionless way in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ himself seems to doubt at times .
Fox News host Laura Ingraham delivered a zinger that isn ’ t far from the truth .
Anecdotally , my sleep-fighting 2-year-old crashed hard on the couch while my wife was watching the impeachment trial .
On the screen was Adam Schiff droning away .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
The impeachment debacle is going into Day 4 and it’s already painful to hear. House Managers have been presenting their “case” for two days and still have another day to continue saying nothing of substance.
That alone is bad enough, but when you consider most of the talking is being done by House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff, the level of discomfort can be doubled. It isn’t just his annoying voice or pedantic rhetoric that makes it sound like white noise. It’s the passionless way in which he presents a case that he himself seems to doubt at times.
Who needs a sound machine to sleep? Adam Schiff provides the best white noise out there. — Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) January 24, 2020
Fox News host Laura Ingraham delivered a zinger that isn’t far from the truth. Anecdotally, my sleep-fighting 2-year-old crashed hard on the couch while my wife was watching the impeachment trial. On the screen was Adam Schiff droning away.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-24--Video: Massive explosion in Houston

Video: Massive explosion in Houston

A massive explosion in northwest Houston shattered windows as far as 20-miles away just before 4:25 am on Friday .
The explosion occurred around the 4500 block of Gessner Rd , a busy street with residential housing to the east and industrial businesses to the west .
The explosion was so powerful , it could be seen briefly on local weather radar .
Law enforcement hasn ’ t identified the source of the explosion , but some reports indicate it happened at Watson Grinding and Manufacturing , CNC machining and large-scale grinding company .
Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo indicated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exploded .
Twitter users in the area have been posting about it all morning .
Our thoughts and prayers go to the people of Houston who were affected by the explosion .
This story is breaking and will be updated as more information is made available .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Update: Two people have been confirmed killed in the blast. Houston PD delivered an update.
Original Article:
A massive explosion in northwest Houston shattered windows as far as 20-miles away just before 4:25 am on Friday. The explosion occurred around the 4500 block of Gessner Rd, a busy street with residential housing to the east and industrial businesses to the west.
The explosion was so powerful, it could be seen briefly on local weather radar.
In all my years, I've never seen this on our local radar. A giant explosion occurred just before 4:30am this morning in Northwest Houston and was felt more than 20 miles away. Radar clearly shows this brief FLASH of reflectivity from NW Houston. #explosion #Houston #Radar pic.twitter.com/6XJ5Wa5P0K — Mike Iscovitz (@Fox26Mike) January 24, 2020
Explosion in NW Houston…radar picked up a return near the location at the same time #houwx #hounews pic.twitter.com/Sk8kqztPbo — Jeff Lindner (@JeffLindner1) January 24, 2020
Law enforcement hasn’t identified the source of the explosion, but some reports indicate it happened at Watson Grinding and Manufacturing, CNC machining and large-scale grinding company. Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo indicated it was a “plant” that exploded.
Increases flames and small explosions at plant continue per @houstonpolice airship. Please avoid exposure if at possible until further notice. — Chief Art Acevedo (@ArtAcevedo) January 24, 2020
Twitter users in the area have been posting about it all morning.
BREAKING: Massive #explosion of a building caught on CCTV at 4am in Houston, Texas. 2 injured.pic.twitter.com/yexoiRKpOM — Banana News 24/7 (@banana_news_247) January 24, 2020
BREAKING NEWS: We are gathering more information but we know a massive explosion has been reported in northwest Houston. Some people living on Genard near Gessner and the surrounding area are being evacuated. No reports yet of injuries but lots of damage https://t.co/oNaxeevA79 — Brhe Berry ABC13 (@BrheABC13) January 24, 2020
Building Explosion 4500 Gessner: HPD command post at Tanner @ Gessner. All traffic avoid hot zone between Gessner, Genard, Sefani & Clay Rd. #houtraffic #hounews CC8 — Houston Police (@houstonpolice) January 24, 2020
photos from inside a nearby home on #neighborhood watch . Ceiling cracked, sliding doors blown in. Everyone ok. Kids were terrified, he says. #houstonexplosion #Houston #houston_explosion pic.twitter.com/sruHqiJ8MB — imaa007 (@imaa007) January 24, 2020
Thoughts to all those near the #explosion. Everyone check on your neighbors, especially the elderly.
Structural damage will need to be assessed on all those in area too. My ceiling fell down 2 miles away.#Allstate#SpringBranchExplosion #Houston #HoustonExplosion https://t.co/rOjeefhmbD — Seth Victoria (@Original_Seth_V) January 24, 2020
I’m at Gessner and Clay in #Houston where the Watson Grinding plant had an #explosion. Rocked all of Houston. Plant worker said there were “a couple of people there”. News crews here. pic.twitter.com/Zh7uaJmKZZ — Hero 004 (@CharleyLGardner) January 24, 2020
Looks like the actual explosion occurred at 4522 Steffani Lane. Check out the tanks on the side of the building. #houston #Explosion pic.twitter.com/5OHGmGnYxt — Add your name (@premo22pr) January 24, 2020
Breaking: Video just into our newsroom showing the aftermath of an explosion in Houston, TX. Police say this is an industrial facility. Witnesses say the windows and walls of their homes rattled. At this hour, authorities warn of a second blast. @wpri12 pic.twitter.com/w5BPCwx2a6 — Brandon Truitt (@BrandonTruittTV) January 24, 2020
?TAKE A LOOK: some serious damage to a NW Houston come from the massive explosion overnight. https://t.co/VCbuWp7Clc — John-Carlos Estrada (@Mr_JCE) January 24, 2020
Major explosion in Northwest Houston, neat Clay & Gessner. Did you hear it this morning? HPD blocking off the “hot zone” — Clay, Gessner, Steffani, and Genard @abc13houston #breaking #houston #traffic pic.twitter.com/JTddN7NFYl — Katherine Whaley (@KatherineABC13) January 24, 2020
Our thoughts and prayers go to the people of Houston who were affected by the explosion. This story is breaking and will be updated as more information is made available.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-24--Senator Mike Braun was absolutely correct when he said the President ‘didn’t do it’

There are times when I ’ m forced to do what I strongly recommend others not to do .
I often scan mainstream media feeds for stories that aren ’ t being covered by my conservative media peers .
On occasion , I ’ ll run across a story that progressive media reports as damaging to conservatives , and oftentimes these stories end up being ignored by the right .
It ’ s human nature to engage in confirmation bias , and since journalists are human , we do it all the time .
We ’ ll report stories that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are unfavorable .
One story being promoted by progressive media as an “ example of Republican glibness ” and “ another Republican Senator trapped by the President ’ s delusions ” revolves around a Tweet Senator Mike Braun posted .
Newsweek , who famously said the President was golfing while he was serving Thanksgiving food to troops in Afghanistan , ran with the headline , “ Republican senator tweets video of himself saying Trump never asked Ukraine to investigate Biden , despite video showing Trump doing it.
” The implication , of course @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President asked Ukraine to investigate the Bidens .
Is that really what he said ?
Here ’ s the Tweet : This is a textbook example of leftist media seeing what they want to see and hearing what they want to hear .
In reality , Braun ’ s answer to the loaded question was spot-on .
He wasn ’ t saying the President never asked Ukraine to investigate the Bidens , a fact that was made clear on multiple occasions , including the transcript of the phone call between President Trump and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ objecting to was the the second half of the question , “ and withhold foreign aid to coerce him into doing so.
” It ’ s patently clear in or out of context that Braun was referring to the second half of the question .
He said , “ No , I ’ m not saying that ’ s okay .
I ’ m not saying that ’ s appropriate.
” He clearly wasn ’ t referring to the request to investigate the Bidens .
That would be silly , as doing so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do to avoid investigation is to run for president .
Braun was obviously saying that the second half of the question posited by the reporter never happened .
The President did not withhold aid to coerce Ukraine into investigating the Bidens , as Ambassador Gordon Sondland was forced to admit during the House impeachment hearings .
The speed at which progressive mainstream media pounces on Republicans is only matched by the speed at which they run away from a story when their narrative blows up in their face .
Senator Mike Braun corrected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
There are times when I’m forced to do what I strongly recommend others not to do. I often scan mainstream media feeds for stories that aren’t being covered by my conservative media peers. On occasion, I’ll run across a story that progressive media reports as damaging to conservatives, and oftentimes these stories end up being ignored by the right. It’s human nature to engage in confirmation bias, and since journalists are human, we do it all the time. We’ll report stories that favor our narrative and ignore stories that are unfavorable.
One story being promoted by progressive media as an “example of Republican glibness” and “another Republican Senator trapped by the President’s delusions” revolves around a Tweet Senator Mike Braun posted. Newsweek, who famously said the President was golfing while he was serving Thanksgiving food to troops in Afghanistan, ran with the headline, “Republican senator tweets video of himself saying Trump never asked Ukraine to investigate Biden, despite video showing Trump doing it.” The implication, of course, is that Braun was denying the President asked Ukraine to investigate the Bidens. Is that really what he said? Here’s the Tweet:
REPORTER: So you're saying that it's okay for a President to ask a foreign leader to investigate a political rival and withhold foreign aid to coerce him into doing so? BRAUN: No, I'm not saying that's okay. I'm not saying that's appropriate. I'm saying that it DIDN'T HAPPEN. pic.twitter.com/nARMXL1KEz — Senator Mike Braun (@SenatorBraun) January 23, 2020
This is a textbook example of leftist media seeing what they want to see and hearing what they want to hear. In reality, Braun’s answer to the loaded question was spot-on. He wasn’t saying the President never asked Ukraine to investigate the Bidens, a fact that was made clear on multiple occasions, including the transcript of the phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky. What he was objecting to was the the second half of the question, “and withhold foreign aid to coerce him into doing so.”
It’s patently clear in or out of context that Braun was referring to the second half of the question. He said, “No, I’m not saying that’s okay. I’m not saying that’s appropriate.” He clearly wasn’t referring to the request to investigate the Bidens. That would be silly, as doing so would insinuate that all anyone has to do to avoid investigation is to run for president. Braun was obviously saying that the second half of the question posited by the reporter never happened. The President did not withhold aid to coerce Ukraine into investigating the Bidens, as Ambassador Gordon Sondland was forced to admit during the House impeachment hearings.
The speed at which progressive mainstream media pounces on Republicans is only matched by the speed at which they run away from a story when their narrative blows up in their face. Senator Mike Braun corrected their false insinuation, nothing more.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-24--Timing is everything: Why the Middle East peace plan MIGHT be released before Tuesday

Journalists and pundits are still trying to learn how to interpret President Trump ’ s comments and Tweets over three years into his first term in the White House .
Most are still struggling to do so ; they haven ’ t quite mastered the nuances of how he answers questions and the fact that policy works-in-progress can come across as declarations of facts .
It can be challenging , but some of us understand that unless he ’ s explicit and detailed in a response , we have to assume what he says is being considered rather than be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this reason we held off on reporting that the “ Deal of the Century ” would be unveiled before Tuesday .
Maybe it will .
Maybe it won ’ t .
Everything depends on the whether the timing of the moment is appropriate .
Some have assumed that Vice President Mike Pence ’ s invitation for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his opponent , Benny Gantz , to visit the White House on Tuesday was a sign that the deal ’ s release was impending .
But President Trump initially dispelled the notion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when asked on a flight to Florida about releasing the peace plan when the Israeli leaders arrived , the President said , “ Sometime prior to that .
Probably , we ’ ll release it a little bit prior to that.
” The President then went on to describe the unprecedented visit in which both the Israeli Prime Minister and his competitor in the upcoming election would be visiting at the same time .
Vice President Pence had been asked to invite Netanyahu .
The Prime Minister suggested they invite Gantz as well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extremely important for both countries , which is why it ’ s still very possible the peace plan will not be released before it .
While it ’ s likely the plan will be revealed to the two Israelis , there ’ s a chance the potential for unrest from the Palestinians and the ongoing impeachment trial could delay the public release further .
But releasing it now would actually be very good timing considering so much focus is being placed on impeachment at home and the election in Israel .
Palestinian protests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in American mainstream media .
It would be released when the President ’ s legal team is finishing up their opening arguments .
If both Israeli leaders seem poised to endorse the plan , the timing might be perfect for all involved .
But if Gantz objects at all , the insertion of American politics into the Israeli election will receive some backlash .
Many expect the plan to favor Israel with financial incentives to try to coax the Palestinians into accepting it reluctantly .
Jerusalem and the West Bank settlements are both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demilitarizing the Gaza Strip is a certainty .
Palestinians have already balked at the partial plan release last year , and that was supposed to be the positive part for them .
It ’ s unlikely they will favor the political side of the plan which is set to give Israel the security and control factors they ’ ve sought before considering any two-state solution .
The White House has to weigh and balance all of the factors to determine whether releasing the plan now will benefit the President or not .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s difficult to know which way the optics will go .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Journalists and pundits are still trying to learn how to interpret President Trump’s comments and Tweets over three years into his first term in the White House. Most are still struggling to do so; they haven’t quite mastered the nuances of how he answers questions and the fact that policy works-in-progress can come across as declarations of facts. It can be challenging, but some of us understand that unless he’s explicit and detailed in a response, we have to assume what he says is being considered rather than be in motion.
It’s for this reason we held off on reporting that the “Deal of the Century” would be unveiled before Tuesday. Maybe it will. Maybe it won’t. Everything depends on the whether the timing of the moment is appropriate. Some have assumed that Vice President Mike Pence’s invitation for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his opponent, Benny Gantz, to visit the White House on Tuesday was a sign that the deal’s release was impending. But President Trump initially dispelled the notion as speculation in Tweet.
The United States looks forward to welcoming Prime Minister @Netanyahu & Blue & White Chairman @Gantzbe to the @WhiteHouse next week. Reports about details and timing of our closely-held peace plan are purely speculative. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 23, 2020
Later, when asked on a flight to Florida about releasing the peace plan when the Israeli leaders arrived, the President said, “Sometime prior to that. Probably, we’ll release it a little bit prior to that.”
The President then went on to describe the unprecedented visit in which both the Israeli Prime Minister and his competitor in the upcoming election would be visiting at the same time. Vice President Pence had been asked to invite Netanyahu. The Prime Minister suggested they invite Gantz as well.
Optics on this visit will be extremely important for both countries, which is why it’s still very possible the peace plan will not be released before it. While it’s likely the plan will be revealed to the two Israelis, there’s a chance the potential for unrest from the Palestinians and the ongoing impeachment trial could delay the public release further.
But releasing it now would actually be very good timing considering so much focus is being placed on impeachment at home and the election in Israel. Palestinian protests will be more muted, at least in American mainstream media. It would be released when the President’s legal team is finishing up their opening arguments. If both Israeli leaders seem poised to endorse the plan, the timing might be perfect for all involved. But if Gantz objects at all, the insertion of American politics into the Israeli election will receive some backlash.
Many expect the plan to favor Israel with financial incentives to try to coax the Palestinians into accepting it reluctantly. Jerusalem and the West Bank settlements are both expected to fall under Israeli control and demilitarizing the Gaza Strip is a certainty. Palestinians have already balked at the partial plan release last year, and that was supposed to be the positive part for them. It’s unlikely they will favor the political side of the plan which is set to give Israel the security and control factors they’ve sought before considering any two-state solution.
The White House has to weigh and balance all of the factors to determine whether releasing the plan now will benefit the President or not. As with everything involving the Middle East, it’s difficult to know which way the optics will go.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-24--AOC’s team promotes her Facebook ads by targeting people interested in Karl Marx: Report

Facebook ’ s rules on political advertising demand transparency as much as possible on a site that thrives on its users ’ personal transparency .
This is why their service is free .
Their product is… you .
They use you to attract advertisers because they have the market cornered on massive personal user data .
Combine their need for advertising transparency with their massive amounts of data they have on us and we quickly see how the company can be so valuable for political campaigns .
After all , politics is the exchange of and debate over ideas that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down particular paths , so it makes sense that Facebook would allow advertisers to be very specific with their target audiences .
Thanks to transparency in advertising , we now know Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez targets those who have an interest in Karl Marx .
To be fair , this has not been independently corroborated .
The original poster , Tom Woods , has a vested interest in promoting his free ( and excellent ) eBook titled “ AOC is Wrong.
” And this would be an extremely easy image to Photoshop into whatever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we are giving this post a high likelihood of being accurate because , let ’ s face it , AOC ’ s team would definitely target people interested in Karl Marx when they ’ re promoting her or her campaign fundraising .
AOC loves Marxists and Marxists love her because she ’ s one of them .
This may not be a blockbuster story by any means , but it ’ s definitely telling .
The freshman Congresswoman has been the most prolific social media user on Capitol Hill since being sworn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ She even held some classes for her caucus to train them how to use social media more effectively .
Experience from my past life owning a digital marketing company tells me that if I were running her social media and sought a friendly audience with the advertising , I ’ d target people with interests like “ Karl Marx , ” “ American Communism , ” “ Socialism in America , ” and “ Modern Monetary Theory.
” There is a very specific type of American who can stomach the radical socialistic and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ audience is limited to extreme Marxists .
Unfortunately , their ranks are rising in America .
They must be stopped .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Facebook’s rules on political advertising demand transparency as much as possible on a site that thrives on its users’ personal transparency. This is why their service is free. Their product is… you. They use you to attract advertisers because they have the market cornered on massive personal user data.
Combine their need for advertising transparency with their massive amounts of data they have on us and we quickly see how the company can be so valuable for political campaigns. After all, politics is the exchange of and debate over ideas that are intended to take jurisdictions and constituencies down particular paths, so it makes sense that Facebook would allow advertisers to be very specific with their target audiences. Thanks to transparency in advertising, we now know Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez targets those who have an interest in Karl Marx.
AOC's people are using Facebook ads to target people who are interested in Karl Marx. Time to visit https://t.co/rXeLjMvNkd pic.twitter.com/LVgKtQRjDw — Tom Woods (@ThomasEWoods) January 24, 2020
To be fair, this has not been independently corroborated. The original poster, Tom Woods, has a vested interest in promoting his free (and excellent) eBook titled “AOC is Wrong.” And this would be an extremely easy image to Photoshop into whatever anyone wanted it to say. Nevertheless, we are giving this post a high likelihood of being accurate because, let’s face it, AOC’s team would definitely target people interested in Karl Marx when they’re promoting her or her campaign fundraising.
AOC loves Marxists and Marxists love her because she’s one of them.
This may not be a blockbuster story by any means, but it’s definitely telling. The freshman Congresswoman has been the most prolific social media user on Capitol Hill since being sworn in just over a year ago. She even held some classes for her caucus to train them how to use social media more effectively. Experience from my past life owning a digital marketing company tells me that if I were running her social media and sought a friendly audience with the advertising, I’d target people with interests like “Karl Marx,” “American Communism,” “Socialism in America,” and “Modern Monetary Theory.”
There is a very specific type of American who can stomach the radical socialistic and communistic principles AOC espouses. Her target audience is limited to extreme Marxists. Unfortunately, their ranks are rising in America. They must be stopped.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-24--President Trump’s March for Life speech demonstrates why the faithful must vote for him

The label “ pro-life Democrat ” is quickly becoming obsolete .
It ’ s antiquated ; one would have an easier time finding someone who speaks Paakantyi than a Democratic politician who is pro-life .
Yes , there are still a few , but they ’ re being systematically pushed aside .
Being pro-life is anathema in the New Democratic Party .
Lawmakers who are flying the blue flag are being forced to switch their views or get forced out completely .
At the 2020 March for Life rally in Washington DC on Friday , President Trump became the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He delivered a 13-minute speech that included Bible verses and praise for God who created us .
It wasn ’ t his best speech , but it had a beautiful message that resonated with the youthful crowd .
Ever since he became a candidate , many conservatives and Christians have struggled with his apparent lack of experience with the Bible .
Many mocked him when he addressed an audience by quoting “ Two Corinthians.
” They shared the clip of him saying he never asks for forgiveness from God .
They pointed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of his adult life and questioned whether or not he would be a champion for the unborn if allowed to sit in the Oval Office .
I know these things because I was one of them .
I was a “ Never Trumper ” who reluctantly accepted him as the lesser-of-two evils .
But even as I feared what Hillary Clinton would do as president , I was also fearful that Donald Trump would turn away from his promises , including his promise to protect the sanctity of life .
Today and for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ admit that was completely wrong .
Was I wrong about his personality being abrasive or his leadership style being too bombastic ?
No .
Was I wrong about him being weak in his knowledge of the Bible ?
No .
But where I was very wrong is in the only place that counts the most when it comes to presidential leadership .
I was wrong about him breaking his promises , especially his promise to protect preborn babies .
He has fulfilled this and many other promises and far exceeded even my most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in office .
During these years with him as President , his consistency on the abortion issue has been a stark contrast to the radical and rapid evolution of the Democratic Party .
They went from preaching abortion that was “ safe , legal , and rare ” to becoming the party of extreme adherence to promoting the principles of abortion-on-demand .
They ’ ve stretched far beyond the middle ground on abortion to the point they continuously block votes to make it illegal to let a baby die if born alive after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abortion to be legal right up to the point of delivery .
There was a time when I believed the only people who could support late-term abortions were those who were completely unaware of how brutal and heartbreaking the practice really is .
I was wrong once again .
Today , many Democratic leaders are fully aware of what they ’ re promoting and are willing to encourage the practice anyway .
It is evil , and I do not use that word lightly .
I normally reserve it for descriptions of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proposed by Democratic candidates for president can only be described as a proper representation of demonic evil .
Listen to this speech .
Ask yourself if any of President Trump ’ s Democratic candidates could say anything he says or do anything he ’ s done to protect the sanctity of life in America .
Then , imagine how empowered the abortion industry would be if he loses .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
The label “pro-life Democrat” is quickly becoming obsolete. It’s antiquated; one would have an easier time finding someone who speaks Paakantyi than a Democratic politician who is pro-life. Yes, there are still a few, but they’re being systematically pushed aside. Being pro-life is anathema in the New Democratic Party. Lawmakers who are flying the blue flag are being forced to switch their views or get forced out completely.
At the 2020 March for Life rally in Washington DC on Friday, President Trump became the first president to address the rally in person. He delivered a 13-minute speech that included Bible verses and praise for God who created us. It wasn’t his best speech, but it had a beautiful message that resonated with the youthful crowd.
Ever since he became a candidate, many conservatives and Christians have struggled with his apparent lack of experience with the Bible. Many mocked him when he addressed an audience by quoting “Two Corinthians.” They shared the clip of him saying he never asks for forgiveness from God. They pointed out that he was pro-choice for most of his adult life and questioned whether or not he would be a champion for the unborn if allowed to sit in the Oval Office. I know these things because I was one of them. I was a “Never Trumper” who reluctantly accepted him as the lesser-of-two evils. But even as I feared what Hillary Clinton would do as president, I was also fearful that Donald Trump would turn away from his promises, including his promise to protect the sanctity of life.
Today and for a while now, I can humbly admit that was completely wrong. Was I wrong about his personality being abrasive or his leadership style being too bombastic? No. Was I wrong about him being weak in his knowledge of the Bible? No. But where I was very wrong is in the only place that counts the most when it comes to presidential leadership. I was wrong about him breaking his promises, especially his promise to protect preborn babies. He has fulfilled this and many other promises and far exceeded even my most generous expectations of what he would do in office.
During these years with him as President, his consistency on the abortion issue has been a stark contrast to the radical and rapid evolution of the Democratic Party. They went from preaching abortion that was “safe, legal, and rare” to becoming the party of extreme adherence to promoting the principles of abortion-on-demand. They’ve stretched far beyond the middle ground on abortion to the point they continuously block votes to make it illegal to let a baby die if born alive after a failed abortion. They push for abortion to be legal right up to the point of delivery.
There was a time when I believed the only people who could support late-term abortions were those who were completely unaware of how brutal and heartbreaking the practice really is. I was wrong once again. Today, many Democratic leaders are fully aware of what they’re promoting and are willing to encourage the practice anyway. It is evil, and I do not use that word lightly. I normally reserve it for descriptions of the demonic realm.
Seeing what is being proposed by Democratic candidates for president can only be described as a proper representation of demonic evil.
Listen to this speech. Ask yourself if any of President Trump’s Democratic candidates could say anything he says or do anything he’s done to protect the sanctity of life in America. Then, imagine how empowered the abortion industry would be if he loses.
It’s terrifying.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]
Dr. Joseph Mercola said, “Synthetic meat is the epitome of ultraprocessed food, and it seems naïve to think it won’t have health effects similar to other ultraprocessed junk foods.” For All-American REAL beef raised in pastures, sous vide, then freeze-dried for long-term storage, visit Whole Cows and use promo code “no junk” at checkout.


noqreport--2020-01-24--Huawei: The other Chinese virus that’s infecting the world

Huawei , the gigantic Chinese tech company that specializes in telecommunications infrastructure , is dangerous .
Despite vehement claims to the contrary , they are completely controlled by the Chinese Communist Party .
They can not be trusted , yet their technology is spreading like wildfire across the globe .
The reason is simple : In many ways , they ’ re the only viable gig in town .
The United Kingdom is strongly considering letting Huawei build their entire 5G infrastructure , a move that prompted the White House to send a delegation to warn them about the risks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we know and we accept those risks .
Imagine if the U.S. government controlled Apple .
Would you be more or less likely to own their products knowing there ’ s always a chance any federal agency or department could access your private information ?
If that would give you an ounce of concern , multiply that times 100 because with China and Huawei , we can be certain they are monitoring , collecting , and storing every bit of data they collect .
This is why the White House is so adamant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as possible .
They ’ ve even come close to putting its large collective foot down when it comes to allies , especially members of the “ Five Eyes ” who share intelligence about everyone , particularly nations like China .
They are already bigger than Oracle and Dell .
They are approaching the size and value of Cisco , Samsung , and Intel .
And as Newt Gingrich noted , we can only blame ourselves for no pushing American companies to match or exceed their technological prowess and infrastructure clout .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to counter their narrative .
If a country wants 5G , Huawei is the best company to provide it for them .
As The Epoch Times writer James Gorrie noted , this all ties back to the Phase I trade deal just signed this month between Beijing and DC .
If a conviction occurs , how serious will Beijing be about fulfilling its side of the Phase One deal ?
It wouldn ’ t be a surprise if China backed out of the deal ; doubts of its ability to meet the terms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States could ban Huawei from the American banking system , severely hindering its ability to do business .
That option is already been considered and remains on the table .
China , on the other hand , may be engaged in bit of messaging as well .
Huawei ’ s legal department issued what looks like a thinly veiled threat when chief legal officer Song Liuping stated that , “ Banning a company like Huawei , just because we started in China—this does not solve cyber security challenges.
” The meaning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Beijing is threatening cyberattacks against the United States if the case against Meng goes forward and/or results in a conviction and further actions against Huawei .
The cost of containing Huawei may well be the unwinding of Phase One , which may have been Beijing ’ s plan all along .
Two things are certain : Huawei is a CCP-run company that happens to have the market cornered on 5G infrastructure , and until an American company figures out how to compete with them , the 5G future rests in the palm of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Huawei, the gigantic Chinese tech company that specializes in telecommunications infrastructure, is dangerous. Despite vehement claims to the contrary, they are completely controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. They cannot be trusted, yet their technology is spreading like wildfire across the globe.
The reason is simple: In many ways, they’re the only viable gig in town. The United Kingdom is strongly considering letting Huawei build their entire 5G infrastructure, a move that prompted the White House to send a delegation to warn them about the risks. The UK’s response: we know and we accept those risks.
Imagine if the U.S. government controlled Apple. Would you be more or less likely to own their products knowing there’s always a chance any federal agency or department could access your private information? If that would give you an ounce of concern, multiply that times 100 because with China and Huawei, we can be certain they are monitoring, collecting, and storing every bit of data they collect. This is why the White House is so adamant about keeping Huawei as contained in China as possible. They’ve even come close to putting its large collective foot down when it comes to allies, especially members of the “Five Eyes” who share intelligence about everyone, particularly nations like China.
They are already bigger than Oracle and Dell. They are approaching the size and value of Cisco, Samsung, and Intel. And as Newt Gingrich noted, we can only blame ourselves for no pushing American companies to match or exceed their technological prowess and infrastructure clout. This is making it harder for the administration to counter their narrative. If a country wants 5G, Huawei is the best company to provide it for them.
As The Epoch Times writer James Gorrie noted, this all ties back to the Phase I trade deal just signed this month between Beijing and DC.
If a conviction occurs, how serious will Beijing be about fulfilling its side of the Phase One deal? It wouldn’t be a surprise if China backed out of the deal; doubts of its ability to meet the terms already exist. If that happened, the United States could ban Huawei from the American banking system, severely hindering its ability to do business. That option is already been considered and remains on the table. China, on the other hand, may be engaged in bit of messaging as well. Huawei’s legal department issued what looks like a thinly veiled threat when chief legal officer Song Liuping stated that, “Banning a company like Huawei, just because we started in China—this does not solve cyber security challenges.” The meaning of this statement seems rather clear: Beijing is threatening cyberattacks against the United States if the case against Meng goes forward and/or results in a conviction and further actions against Huawei. The cost of containing Huawei may well be the unwinding of Phase One, which may have been Beijing’s plan all along.
Two things are certain: Huawei is a CCP-run company that happens to have the market cornered on 5G infrastructure, and until an American company figures out how to compete with them, the 5G future rests in the palm of their hands.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-24--It’s time to take sensible precautions against China’s coronavirus

It isn ’ t time to dust off the hazmat suit quite yet , but standard precautions are definitely in order to prevent the coronavirus from doing more harm than it already has .
The second case of the coronavirus has been confirmed in the United States and 63 potential cases are being monitored as of Friday morning .
What ’ s worse is that the second case , which involves a woman in her 60s in the Chicago area , was not detectable with standard precautions when she flew back to the United States from Wuhan in China on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ later that she started feeling symptoms and only today nearly two weeks after she arrived back in America , was her diagnosis confirmed .
Is it time to panic ?
No .
Despite 26 deaths and over 900 known cases of the disease worldwide , the World Health Organization has declined to declare an emergency .
This is mostly for economic reasons ; health emergencies greatly disrupt worldwide trade , travel , and tourism .
But they are doctors first and if they felt the disease was growing out of control , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the markets deal with the economy later .
There are three things that need to be done now just in case the coronavirus starts getting uglier in the United States .
• Airlines and airports must adopt strict screening processes , including quarantines and tests , for anyone traveling back from heavily infected countries .
Currently , that ’ s only China .
Blood tests can take 4-6 hours once samples are received by a lab , so it may be necessary to take samples from those who are not showing symptoms and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Those showing symptoms should be quarantined until their test results come back negative .
• Knowledge is the best defense against outbreaks .
Doctors should communicate to their patients that if they experience symptoms , they need to coordinate with the doctor ’ s office to set up a test .
Sending a bunch of people to the hospital could exacerbate the problem , as China is learning , because hospitals can become breeding grounds for viruses .
It ’ s up to the personal healthcare professionals of this nation to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people of the precautions they should take .
• Americans need to be in full viral mode .
That means washing hands regularly , avoiding touching eyes , nose and mouth areas , and avoiding crowded places like public transportation whenever possible .
Again , it ’ s not a time to panic , but staying healthy when there are unknown risks is always easiest when the right defenses are put in place .
Thoroughly washing one ’ s hands is the best way to prevent and contain it .
Hand sanitizer is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not a replacement for lots of soap and hot water .
Face masks when out in public wouldn ’ t be a terrible idea , either .
It isn ’ t wise to wait until a case of the coronavirus is found in one ’ s area .
This potential epidemic spreads quickly , but symptoms do not always appear immediately .
We need to stay cautious and practice proper sanitation , which is a best practice anyway .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
It isn’t time to dust off the hazmat suit quite yet, but standard precautions are definitely in order to prevent the coronavirus from doing more harm than it already has. The second case of the coronavirus has been confirmed in the United States and 63 potential cases are being monitored as of Friday morning.
What’s worse is that the second case, which involves a woman in her 60s in the Chicago area, was not detectable with standard precautions when she flew back to the United States from Wuhan in China on January 13. It was four days later that she started feeling symptoms and only today nearly two weeks after she arrived back in America, was her diagnosis confirmed.
Is it time to panic? No. Despite 26 deaths and over 900 known cases of the disease worldwide, the World Health Organization has declined to declare an emergency. This is mostly for economic reasons; health emergencies greatly disrupt worldwide trade, travel, and tourism. But they are doctors first and if they felt the disease was growing out of control, they’d call the emergency and let the markets deal with the economy later.
There are three things that need to be done now just in case the coronavirus starts getting uglier in the United States.
Airlines and airports must adopt strict screening processes, including quarantines and tests, for anyone traveling back from heavily infected countries. Currently, that’s only China. Blood tests can take 4-6 hours once samples are received by a lab, so it may be necessary to take samples from those who are not showing symptoms and call them once the results are back. Those showing symptoms should be quarantined until their test results come back negative. Knowledge is the best defense against outbreaks. Doctors should communicate to their patients that if they experience symptoms, they need to coordinate with the doctor’s office to set up a test. Sending a bunch of people to the hospital could exacerbate the problem, as China is learning, because hospitals can become breeding grounds for viruses. It’s up to the personal healthcare professionals of this nation to be the tip of the spear in informing people of the precautions they should take. Americans need to be in full viral mode. That means washing hands regularly, avoiding touching eyes, nose and mouth areas, and avoiding crowded places like public transportation whenever possible. Again, it’s not a time to panic, but staying healthy when there are unknown risks is always easiest when the right defenses are put in place. Thoroughly washing one’s hands is the best way to prevent and contain it. Hand sanitizer is probably fine, but it’s not a replacement for lots of soap and hot water. Face masks when out in public wouldn’t be a terrible idea, either.
It isn’t wise to wait until a case of the coronavirus is found in one’s area. This potential epidemic spreads quickly, but symptoms do not always appear immediately. We need to stay cautious and practice proper sanitation, which is a best practice anyway.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]