noqreport--2020-01-26--Paula White is a fraud and heretic who should be removed from the White House

For all intents and purposes , Paula White is a scam artist .
The popular female televangelist has made a career out of spreading a false doctrine , from what I ’ ve been told by trusted allies .
One might wonder why I haven ’ t done more research on her .
It ’ s simple .
She ’ s unbearable to watch on video as it ’ s clear within seconds she doesn ’ t understand the Bible .
Her latest escapades are just a reminder that she ’ s not a proper leader of Christians and doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House .
She called for all “ satanic pregnancies ” to miscarry , and while technically one can argue that at face value the comment was sound ( who wants truly “ satanic pregnancies ” to be successful ? )
, the implication is misleading at best .
What does she define as a “ satanic pregnancy ” ?
President Trump ( and all of us ) need sound doctrine to be flowing into his ears .
There will be populists and secularists who don ’ t consider White ’ s heretical teachings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President likely doesn ’ t take much of her advise very seriously , but the optics are horrible and the attachment to a rich televangelist con-artist does not help make the case for most evangelicals to vote for him .
Thankfully , there is a much better case for that , a case that means most evangelicals will vote for him in November in spite of Paula White .
We must pray for our President and our nation .
In doing so , we should pray that he is not misled by this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House , even giving her the lofty responsibility of advising him on spiritual issues .
There are literally thousands of people who would be better advisers on issues of the spirit than Paula White , and I ’ m being conservative with my estimate .
It could be millions , as I ’ d rather he sought spiritual advise from my 13-year-old than from his current spiritual adviser .
My 13-year-old likely has a better understanding of the true Gospel based on the little I ’ ve heard from Paula White .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make about the President , it ’ s that he often doesn ’ t surround himself with the best people .
Rex Tillerson .
H.R .
McMaster .
Michael Cohen .
Anthony Scaramucci .
Omarosa Manigault .
But Paula White as a “ spiritual adviser ” is the worst .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short @ @ @ @ @ @ @ please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
For all intents and purposes, Paula White is a scam artist. The popular female televangelist has made a career out of spreading a false doctrine, from what I’ve been told by trusted allies. One might wonder why I haven’t done more research on her. It’s simple. She’s unbearable to watch on video as it’s clear within seconds she doesn’t understand the Bible.
Her latest escapades are just a reminder that she’s not a proper leader of Christians and doesn’t belong anywhere near the White House. She called for all “satanic pregnancies” to miscarry, and while technically one can argue that at face value the comment was sound (who wants truly “satanic pregnancies” to be successful?), the implication is misleading at best. What does she define as a “satanic pregnancy”?
“We command all satanic pregnancies to miscarry right now” — Special Adviser to the White House Faith and Opportunity Initiative Paula White pic.twitter.com/gtdZyGfkxy — Guthrie Graves-Fitzsimmons (@GuthrieGF) January 25, 2020
President Trump (and all of us) need sound doctrine to be flowing into his ears. There will be populists and secularists who don’t consider White’s heretical teachings to be a big concern as the President likely doesn’t take much of her advise very seriously, but the optics are horrible and the attachment to a rich televangelist con-artist does not help make the case for most evangelicals to vote for him. Thankfully, there is a much better case for that, a case that means most evangelicals will vote for him in November in spite of Paula White.
We must pray for our President and our nation. In doing so, we should pray that he is not misled by this charlatan he has allowed into his White House, even giving her the lofty responsibility of advising him on spiritual issues. There are literally thousands of people who would be better advisers on issues of the spirit than Paula White, and I’m being conservative with my estimate. It could be millions, as I’d rather he sought spiritual advise from my 13-year-old than from his current spiritual adviser. My 13-year-old likely has a better understanding of the true Gospel based on the little I’ve heard from Paula White.
If there’s one complaint we can make about the President, it’s that he often doesn’t surround himself with the best people. Rex Tillerson. H.R. McMaster. Michael Cohen. Anthony Scaramucci. Omarosa Manigault. But Paula White as a “spiritual adviser” is the worst.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-26--Coronavirus: Take precautions, but let’s not freak out just yet, folks

Some are trying to downplay it .
Others are pushing the panic button .
Most Americans seem oblivious despite ongoing coverage on most major news outlets .
But awareness is about to escalate dramatically now that a third case has been confirmed in the United States and as usual , western media will try to blow it out of proportions .
We should be aware and practice sensible virus avoidance procedures just like many Americans do during and flu season .
That doesn ’ t mean it ’ s time to “ go prepper ” and quarantine yourself and your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Orange Country , California , means we stand by our belief of taking appropriate precautions at this time .
Unfortunately , western media loves stoking a good panic even if doing so is dangerous .
Why is it dangerous for the media to stir up panic during medical circumstances like these ?
Because when the boy cried wolf too many times , his people stopped believing him .
There may come a time when a serious medical situation requires the full attention and rapid response of Americans .
The coronavirus itself may even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stage it ’ s simply not that big of a deal .
As The Daily WIre ’ s Matt Walsh noted , this is a tiny scale compared to how the flu spreads throughout our population .
The difference , of course , is that millions of Americans get their flu shot .
There are no comparable preventative treatments at this time for the coronavirus , and the media is playing on that .
When Americans feel unprotected , we often act irrationally .
Unless your plans included traveling to China in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no need to change anything at this point other than practicing basic protective measures .
Don ’ t let breathless mainstream media stir you up into a coronavirus frenzy .
Monitor it .
Wash your hands .
Cancel plans to visit China .
But otherwise , let ’ s not turn a new confirmed case of the virus into a fake national emergency .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Some are trying to downplay it. Others are pushing the panic button. Most Americans seem oblivious despite ongoing coverage on most major news outlets. But awareness is about to escalate dramatically now that a third case has been confirmed in the United States and as usual, western media will try to blow it out of proportions.
We should be aware and practice sensible virus avoidance procedures just like many Americans do during and flu season. That doesn’t mean it’s time to “go prepper” and quarantine yourself and your family. The new case confirmed in Orange Country, California, means we stand by our belief of taking appropriate precautions at this time. Unfortunately, western media loves stoking a good panic even if doing so is dangerous.
Not sure I quite understand this. I see people panicking over the coronavirus which has killed 56 people, all in China. Meanwhile the flu killed 1000 times that many in the US last year and nobody freaked out. Stop letting the media control what you worry about. — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) January 26, 2020
The other thing I remember from the Ebola panic is how angry people got when you didn’t participate in the panic. It’s happening again in the comments on this thread. Very strange psychological phenomenon. I’m more fascinated by it than annoyed. — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) January 26, 2020
Why is it dangerous for the media to stir up panic during medical circumstances like these? Because when the boy cried wolf too many times, his people stopped believing him. There may come a time when a serious medical situation requires the full attention and rapid response of Americans. The coronavirus itself may even get there, but at this early stage it’s simply not that big of a deal.
As The Daily WIre’s Matt Walsh noted, this is a tiny scale compared to how the flu spreads throughout our population. The difference, of course, is that millions of Americans get their flu shot. There are no comparable preventative treatments at this time for the coronavirus, and the media is playing on that. When Americans feel unprotected, we often act irrationally. Unless your plans included traveling to China in the near future, there’s really no need to change anything at this point other than practicing basic protective measures.
Don’t let breathless mainstream media stir you up into a coronavirus frenzy. Monitor it. Wash your hands. Cancel plans to visit China. But otherwise, let’s not turn a new confirmed case of the virus into a fake national emergency.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-26--Americana is dying: Why ‘Ford v. Ferrari’ isn’t getting the attention it deserves

Ford v. Ferrari is the best racing movie of all time .
It isn ’ t even close .
It did well at the box office , earned a 92 % on Rotten Tomatoes , and was nominated for Best Picture at the upcoming Academy Awards .
But it ’ s better than that .
Of the six nominated movies I ’ ve seen so far , it ’ s the best one yet .
It ’ s better than Roman Polanksi ’ s daydream tribute by Quentin Tarantino , Once Upon a Time in Hollywood .
It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s on par from a film making perspective as Parasite and much more enjoyable .
It ’ s even better than the big buzz machine , The Irishman .
While I haven ’ t seen three of the movies , the only one that has a realistic chance of being better based on what I know already is 1917 .
But Ford v. Ferrari will not win for Best Picture .
It may pick up one of the editing or sound mixing Oscars , but the big prize is out of reach .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Best Director .
Neither Christian Bale nor Matt Damon were nominated for acting Oscars .
It didn ’ t even get a nod for Best Screenplay .
This movie was given one of nine nominations for Best Picture because not giving them one would be a travesty , but it was otherwise dismissed among the major categories .
Why ?
Is there a Hollywood-favorites angle that often comes into play in which internal strife in Tinseltown detracts from a movie ’ s appeal with the Academy ?
No .
Did it take too @ @ @ @ @ @ @ true story of Carroll Shelby and Ken Miles ?
Not more than usual , with the only two notable changes being Enzo Ferrari ’ s presence at Le Mans ’ 66 ( he wasn ’ t there ) and the omission of Miles ’ loss at Le Mans ’ 65 .
No , this movie didn ’ t suffer from standard Hollywood setbacks .
It was tremendously produced , well-acted , and extremely entertaining .
But it was missing something .
It didn ’ t check off any of the modern day Hollywood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact , the nature of the story as a celebration of American spirit and innovation is practically anathema in today ’ s Hollywood .
If the movie wasn ’ t exceptional but merely very good , it would have been passed over by lesser movies for all of the four nominations it received .
There was a time when patriotism and American exceptionalism were bonuses for movies during award season .
Today , Hollywood has a preference for rooting for anyone other than the United States .
European progressivism is particularly appealing .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of diversity .
It ’ s a movie about a bunch of white men competing with each other .
There are no speaking parts for people of color and the only woman with a significant role is Caitriona Balfe .
But that ’ s the story .
It ’ s mid-1960 ’ s racing in America and Europe , long before Danica Patrick won a race and people like Wendell Scott were rare .
Adding people of color would have been forced .
There are many reasons why Ford v. Ferrari won ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but there are plenty of reasons why it should .
But it won ’ t .
It ’ s just not “ woke ” enough for Hollywood despite being the best racing movie of all time .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates @

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Ford v. Ferrari is the best racing movie of all time. It isn’t even close. It did well at the box office, earned a 92% on Rotten Tomatoes, and was nominated for Best Picture at the upcoming Academy Awards. But it’s better than that. Of the six nominated movies I’ve seen so far, it’s the best one yet.
It’s better than Roman Polanksi’s daydream tribute by Quentin Tarantino, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. It’s better than fan-favorite Joker. It’s on par from a film making perspective as Parasite and much more enjoyable. It’s even better than the big buzz machine, The Irishman. While I haven’t seen three of the movies, the only one that has a realistic chance of being better based on what I know already is 1917.
But Ford v. Ferrari will not win for Best Picture. It may pick up one of the editing or sound mixing Oscars, but the big prize is out of reach. James Mangold did not get nominated for Best Director. Neither Christian Bale nor Matt Damon were nominated for acting Oscars. It didn’t even get a nod for Best Screenplay. This movie was given one of nine nominations for Best Picture because not giving them one would be a travesty, but it was otherwise dismissed among the major categories.
Why? Is there a Hollywood-favorites angle that often comes into play in which internal strife in Tinseltown detracts from a movie’s appeal with the Academy? No. Did it take too many creative liberties diverting itself from the true story of Carroll Shelby and Ken Miles? Not more than usual, with the only two notable changes being Enzo Ferrari’s presence at Le Mans ’66 (he wasn’t there) and the omission of Miles’ loss at Le Mans ’65.
No, this movie didn’t suffer from standard Hollywood setbacks. It was tremendously produced, well-acted, and extremely entertaining. But it was missing something. It didn’t check off any of the modern day Hollywood’s required virtue-signalling boxes. In fact, the nature of the story as a celebration of American spirit and innovation is practically anathema in today’s Hollywood. If the movie wasn’t exceptional but merely very good, it would have been passed over by lesser movies for all of the four nominations it received.
There was a time when patriotism and American exceptionalism were bonuses for movies during award season. Today, Hollywood has a preference for rooting for anyone other than the United States. European progressivism is particularly appealing.
Then, there’s the lack of diversity. It’s a movie about a bunch of white men competing with each other. There are no speaking parts for people of color and the only woman with a significant role is Caitriona Balfe. But that’s the story. It’s mid-1960’s racing in America and Europe, long before Danica Patrick won a race and people like Wendell Scott were rare. Adding people of color would have been forced.
There are many reasons why Ford v. Ferrari won’t win the Best Picture Oscar, but there are plenty of reasons why it should. But it won’t. It’s just not “woke” enough for Hollywood despite being the best racing movie of all time.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-27--John Bolton: ‘If I had to say something I knew was false to protect American national security, I wo

John Bolton: ‘If I had to say something I knew was false to protect American national security, I would do it’

John Bolton has a long history of lying to the American people when he feels national security is at stake .
This may be normal in Washington DC and especially normal in the “ Deep State , ” but it doesn ’ t make us feel secure in trusting someone who on multiple occasions has used his personal ( and often demonstrably wrong ) perspectives as his lodestar for foreign policy .
Case-in-point : Weapons of Mass Destruction ( WMDs ) in Iraq .
As Jon Schwarz at The Intercept noted in 2016 , John Bolton “ is arguably the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about Iraq ’ s nonexistent WMDs.
” Lest we forget , Bolton was pushing President Bush to invade Iraq BEFORE 9/11 .
Now , Bolton is saying President Trump told him personally he was withholding aid for Ukraine over favors he had requested from them .
As the former National Security Adviser , his comments would normally hold weight .
But this is John Bolton , a man who clearly has a grudge against the President , a man who is currently trying to sell his new book .
As the video above @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who ’ s willing to lie to achieve his goals .
According to President Trump , Bolton is lying now as he has done many times in the past .
Before the news of his book leak broke , I offered him what I believed to be a clear path to prevent him from destroying his legacy .
By siding with Democrats and the Deep State , he would be a catalyst for the potential destruction of our nation .
It wasn ’ t hyperbole , but it would appear Bolton ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s sworn to this nation and the Constitution .
There are two things John Bolton has mastered over the years : Lying and getting us into unprovoked wars .
His penchant for saying whatever he feels is necessary to prove himself right is concerning as he attempts to boost book sales .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
John Bolton has a long history of lying to the American people when he feels national security is at stake. This may be normal in Washington DC and especially normal in the “Deep State,” but it doesn’t make us feel secure in trusting someone who on multiple occasions has used his personal (and often demonstrably wrong) perspectives as his lodestar for foreign policy.
Case-in-point: Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) in Iraq. As Jon Schwarz at The Intercept noted in 2016, John Bolton “is arguably the man most responsible for hiding the truth about Iraq’s nonexistent WMDs.” Lest we forget, Bolton was pushing President Bush to invade Iraq BEFORE 9/11.
Now, Bolton is saying President Trump told him personally he was withholding aid for Ukraine over favors he had requested from them. As the former National Security Adviser, his comments would normally hold weight. But this is John Bolton, a man who clearly has a grudge against the President, a man who is currently trying to sell his new book. As the video above demonstrates, he’s a man who’s willing to lie to achieve his goals.
According to President Trump, Bolton is lying now as he has done many times in the past.
I NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. In fact, he never complained about this at the time of his very public termination. If John Bolton said this, it was only to sell a book. With that being said, the… — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 27, 2020
…(Democrats said I never met) and released the military aid to Ukraine without any conditions or investigations – and far ahead of schedule. I also allowed Ukraine to purchase Javelin anti-tank missiles. My Administration has done far more than the previous Administration. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 27, 2020
Before the news of his book leak broke, I offered him what I believed to be a clear path to prevent him from destroying his legacy. By siding with Democrats and the Deep State, he would be a catalyst for the potential destruction of our nation. It wasn’t hyperbole, but it would appear Bolton’s personal goals supersede the various oaths he’s sworn to this nation and the Constitution.
There are two things John Bolton has mastered over the years: Lying and getting us into unprovoked wars. His penchant for saying whatever he feels is necessary to prove himself right is concerning as he attempts to boost book sales.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-27--Ray Recommends Netflix’s Messiah

Ray Recommends Netflix’s Messiah

Netflix debuted it ’ s Messiah series to much controversy globally .
This comes after Netflix had a “ gay @ @ @ @ @ a lot of socialist propaganda .
But Messiah is produced by the same people who @ @ @ @ @ the History Channel .
Ray gives a review of Netflix ’ s Messiah from a @ @ @ @ @ ultimately recommending it as a high quality depiction of an antichrist like figure in film @ @ @ @ @ discerning Christian , this show is for you .
Join fellow patriots as we form @ @ @ @ @ the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats @ @ @ @ @ .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If @ @ @ @ @ join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Netflix debuted it’s Messiah series to much controversy globally. This comes after Netflix had a “gay Jesus” movie and produces a lot of socialist propaganda. But Messiah is produced by the same people who made the Bible miniseries on the History Channel. Ray gives a review of Netflix’s Messiah from a youthful non-PC Christian perspective, ultimately recommending it as a high quality depiction of an antichrist like figure in film. If you are a discerning Christian, this show is for you.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-27--Senator Kelly Loeffler, a Mitt Romney mega-donor, chastises him for siding with Democrats

When Mitt Romney ran for President in 2012 , one of his biggest super PAC donors was Kelly Loeffler .
Between her and her husband , Jeffrey C. Sprecher , they contributed $ 1.5 million to get him elected .
Even though the money was wasted on Romney ’ s horrible campaigning and moderate policies , at least she made a friend who would eventually be a Senator .
Today , Loeffler is a Senator as well .
Appointed by Georgia Governor Brian Kemp , Loeffler is the newest member of the Senate , jumping head-first into her job by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being sworn in .
She has heard the same evidence as Romney , but she has come to a completely different conclusion .
Romney has indicated he is strongly considering voting to hear more witnesses , including former National Security Adviser John Bolton , breaking from his party and demonstrating once again he suffers from arguably the worst case of Trump Derangement Syndrome among any of his Republican colleagues .
Bolton is in the news now because a press leak revealed he insinuated in his upcoming book that President Trump told him he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they complied to his request to investigate corruption that pertained to the United States .
It matches the Democrats ’ claims as the basis of impeachment and offers Romney an opportunity to attack his nemesis .
Imagine a world in which Romney considered the radical progressives of the Democratic Party his actual nemesis .
When Mitt Romney ran for president , Kelly Loeffler and her husband donated $ 1.5 million to help him get elected .
Now that she ’ s his colleague in the Senate , she has seen his true RINO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
When Mitt Romney ran for President in 2012, one of his biggest super PAC donors was Kelly Loeffler. Between her and her husband, Jeffrey C. Sprecher, they contributed $1.5 million to get him elected. Even though the money was wasted on Romney’s horrible campaigning and moderate policies, at least she made a friend who would eventually be a Senator.
Today, Loeffler is a Senator as well. Appointed by Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, Loeffler is the newest member of the Senate, jumping head-first into her job by listening to the impeachment trial shortly after being sworn in. She has heard the same evidence as Romney, but she has come to a completely different conclusion.
After 2 weeks, it’s clear that Democrats have no case for impeachment. Sadly, my colleague @SenatorRomney wants to appease the left by calling witnesses who will slander the @realDonaldTrump during their 15 minutes of fame. The circus is over. It’s time to move on! #gapol — Senator Kelly Loeffler (@SenatorLoeffler) January 27, 2020
Romney has indicated he is strongly considering voting to hear more witnesses, including former National Security Adviser John Bolton, breaking from his party and demonstrating once again he suffers from arguably the worst case of Trump Derangement Syndrome among any of his Republican colleagues.
Bolton is in the news now because a press leak revealed he insinuated in his upcoming book that President Trump told him he was withholding military aid from Ukraine until they complied to his request to investigate corruption that pertained to the United States. It matches the Democrats’ claims as the basis of impeachment and offers Romney an opportunity to attack his nemesis.
Imagine a world in which Romney considered the radical progressives of the Democratic Party his actual nemesis.
When Mitt Romney ran for president, Kelly Loeffler and her husband donated $1.5 million to help him get elected. Now that she’s his colleague in the Senate, she has seen his true RINO colors. This impeachment scam must end.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-27--How many misleading media bombshells do we need to live through?

I am over bombshells .
I have no interest in anonymous sources and people close to the President who only speak on the condition of anonymity .
Accused felons trying to save themselves by making stuff up is so Michael Cohen .
Now I am over John Bolton .
The House “ solemnly ” delivered Articles of Impeachment to the Senate , in a ceremony which included ceremonial pens and a forced march .
And breathless coverage from an adoring media .
The Articles arrived on Senator McConnell ’ s desk without alleging any criminal act and a very thin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trial was scheduled as required .
Then the “ bombshells ” started .
First , the night before the trial , a breathless left-wing press let us all know the Government Accountability Office ( GAO ) had determined the President broke the law by delaying aid that had been approved by Congress for Ukraine .
A few problems .
The aid was to be delivered by September 30th and was released a few weeks before that .
Additionally , the constitutionality of the law in question has been debated often .
In fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similar violations eight times while in office .
Perhaps most interesting is the GAO has 45 days to notify Congress according to the law .
The announcement was well outside that window .
The law itself also has a specific remedy that is not impeachment .
It almost felt like a coordinated hit job .
Then , the night before the President ’ s legal team was set to take the dais in his defense , a tape dropped .
The President had actually told someone to fire Ukrainian Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ out ” during the discussion .
The horror !
Except a President can fire an ambassador for wearing a shirt they think is ugly .
Or holding foreign policy views contrary to the administration and voicing them to our diplomatic partners .
Further the tape was made in 2018 , months before Joe Biden announced his candidacy .
We all knew Yovanovitch was fired and watched her file what sounded like an HR complaint in the House Intelligence Committee .
Given the full context it is also clear President Trump was saying “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This one hit the level of an exasperated eye-roll .
The President ’ s lawyers only took 2 hours on Saturday and pretty much demolished the House repetitive and misleading case .
As they were getting ready to speak again on Monday , BOMBSHELL !
Former National Security Advisor John Bolton said something in his book manuscript that indicated the President said he might hold aid to Ukraine in exchange for investigations .
Bolton ’ s lawyer responded to the story said the only place the manuscript was submitted was to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ books from members and former members for classified information .
The NSC has also been leaking like a sieve since January of 2017 .
It is also where the whistleblower who launched this whole farce used to work .
And according to Breitbart News , one of the people responsible for reviewing these manuscripts is the brother of Democrat star witness Alexander Vindman .
Nothing to see here folks .
Now I am just furious .
If Bolton has something to say , he should just say it .
For a long time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patriot whose foreign policy views I was not always a fan of .
To submit this manuscript now , when he is well aware he is on the Democrat ’ s list of potential witnesses , is vindictive and self-serving .
Got something to say sir ?
Speak up .
I hope your pre-orders , launched today , are dismal .
Additionally , I want who ever leaked this to the New York Times identified , prosecuted and fired .
At some point , someone needs to serve as an example to their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ staff should do a thorough evaluation of all NSC staff and change it up .
Bureaucrats who think they know better than the citizens who elect the President and their congressional representatives can be made available to the market .
Finally , call the offices of our notorious Republican squishes .
Romney , Murkowski , Collins are at the top of the list .
To call witnesses to testify about the accusation of thought crime and policy disagreements with the President is insane .
The impact it will have on the country is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ subjected to a continuous parade of “ breaking news ” that will increase the anxiety , division and anger that is already approaching the boiling point .
End this ridiculous spectacle at the first opportunity .
The very fabric of the country is fraying and the remaining threads can not continue to hold if bombshells keep dropping .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
I am over bombshells. I have no interest in anonymous sources and people close to the President who only speak on the condition of anonymity. Accused felons trying to save themselves by making stuff up is so Michael Cohen. Now I am over John Bolton.
The House “solemnly” delivered Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, in a ceremony which included ceremonial pens and a forced march. And breathless coverage from an adoring media. The Articles arrived on Senator McConnell’s desk without alleging any criminal act and a very thin investigative file.
Still, a Senate trial was scheduled as required. Then the “bombshells” started.
First, the night before the trial, a breathless left-wing press let us all know the Government Accountability Office (GAO) had determined the President broke the law by delaying aid that had been approved by Congress for Ukraine. A few problems. The aid was to be delivered by September 30th and was released a few weeks before that. Additionally, the constitutionality of the law in question has been debated often. In fact, President Obama had been accused of similar violations eight times while in office.
Perhaps most interesting is the GAO has 45 days to notify Congress according to the law. The announcement was well outside that window. The law itself also has a specific remedy that is not impeachment. It almost felt like a coordinated hit job.
Then, the night before the President’s legal team was set to take the dais in his defense, a tape dropped. The President had actually told someone to fire Ukrainian Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch. Allegedly used the phrase “Take her out” during the discussion. The horror!
Except a President can fire an ambassador for wearing a shirt they think is ugly. Or holding foreign policy views contrary to the administration and voicing them to our diplomatic partners. Further the tape was made in 2018, months before Joe Biden announced his candidacy. We all knew Yovanovitch was fired and watched her file what sounded like an HR complaint in the House Intelligence Committee. Given the full context it is also clear President Trump was saying “Taker her out of the position”. This one hit the level of an exasperated eye-roll.
The President’s lawyers only took 2 hours on Saturday and pretty much demolished the House repetitive and misleading case. As they were getting ready to speak again on Monday, BOMBSHELL! Former National Security Advisor John Bolton said something in his book manuscript that indicated the President said he might hold aid to Ukraine in exchange for investigations.
Bolton’s lawyer responded to the story said the only place the manuscript was submitted was to the National Security Council. The NSC reviews books from members and former members for classified information. The NSC has also been leaking like a sieve since January of 2017. It is also where the whistleblower who launched this whole farce used to work. And according to Breitbart News, one of the people responsible for reviewing these manuscripts is the brother of Democrat star witness Alexander Vindman. Nothing to see here folks.
Now I am just furious. If Bolton has something to say, he should just say it. For a long time, I viewed this man as a patriot whose foreign policy views I was not always a fan of. To submit this manuscript now, when he is well aware he is on the Democrat’s list of potential witnesses, is vindictive and self-serving. Got something to say sir? Speak up. I hope your pre-orders, launched today, are dismal.
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!
Additionally, I want who ever leaked this to the New York Times identified, prosecuted and fired. At some point, someone needs to serve as an example to their peers. Then the President and his staff should do a thorough evaluation of all NSC staff and change it up. Bureaucrats who think they know better than the citizens who elect the President and their congressional representatives can be made available to the market.
Finally, call the offices of our notorious Republican squishes. Romney, Murkowski, Collins are at the top of the list. To call witnesses to testify about the accusation of thought crime and policy disagreements with the President is insane. The impact it will have on the country is horrific. The public will only be subjected to a continuous parade of “breaking news” that will increase the anxiety, division and anger that is already approaching the boiling point.
End this ridiculous spectacle at the first opportunity. The very fabric of the country is fraying and the remaining threads cannot continue to hold if bombshells keep dropping.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-27--OAN: President Trump’s approval rating soars amid impeachment trial

What is driving President Trump ’ s highest approval rating since his inauguration ?
Is it that the impeachment debacle is dragging out and demonstrating how much of a partisan political hack job it is ?
Are Americans realizing the doom and gloom the left has been predicting hasn ’ t hit the economy and that more people are working while also making more money ?
It ’ s likely a combination of these two and other facts that support the notion that President Trump truly has made America great again while the Democrats do everything to stop him from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about what happened in Ukraine ?
How many American lives have been affected ?
The longer impeachment drags out , the easier it will be for President Trump to be reelected .
Yet , he ’ s pushing for a speedy end to the debacle .
Why ?
Because despite rising in the polls , he ’ d rather Congress get back to doing work for the people .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
What is driving President Trump’s highest approval rating since his inauguration? Is it that the impeachment debacle is dragging out and demonstrating how much of a partisan political hack job it is? Are Americans realizing the doom and gloom the left has been predicting hasn’t hit the economy and that more people are working while also making more money?
It’s likely a combination of these two and other facts that support the notion that President Trump truly has made America great again while the Democrats do everything to stop him from doing so. How many American care about what happened in Ukraine? How many American lives have been affected?
The longer impeachment drags out, the easier it will be for President Trump to be reelected. Yet, he’s pushing for a speedy end to the debacle. Why? Because despite rising in the polls, he’d rather Congress get back to doing work for the people.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-27--Susan Collins signals she trusts vindictive liars more than her GOP colleagues

There are two important things we ’ ve learned about former National Security Adviser John Bolton since a draft section of his upcoming book was leaked to the press : Though these perspectives are commonly held by those who have worked with Bolton over the decades , it seems mainstream media is oblivious to them .
They didn ’ t used to be .
The evidence about Bolton that supports these premises came from left-leaning publications .
But all is forgotten now that Bolton is the golden boy for Democrats and seems to be justification for Republicans like Senator Susan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as usual .
Calls for additional witnesses have hit a fever pitch following the Bolton leak , and Collins signaled it may be enough to push her over the edge when it a vote .
“ From the beginning , I ’ ve said that in fairness to both parties the decision on whether or not to call witnesses should be made after both the House managers and the President ’ s attorneys have had the opportunity to present their cases .
“ I ’ ve always said that I was likely to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I did in the 1999 Clinton trial .
“ The reports about John Bolton ’ s book strengthen the case for witnesses and have prompted a number of conversations among my colleagues.
” But there ’ s a major flaw in her thinking .
If she is to believe the Bolton book strengthens the case to call him as a witness , she is acknowledging the credibility of the mainstream media sources who reported the leak , Democrats such as Adam Schiff who have promoted every negative aspect of the Ukraine affair , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been demonstrated to be liars .
Meanwhile , all of the actual evidence that is NOT a hearsay account points to the fact that the President did nothing wrong and the entire impeachment debacle is a partisan sham .
Her colleagues in the Senate understand this for the most part .
Every Republican in the House and a handful or Democrats understood it as well .
Whatever it is that ’ s motivating Collins and other Republican Senators who want more witnesses , we know for sure it ’ s not honesty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If Susan Collins and other Republican Senators vote for more witnesses in this partisan impeachment process , they are signaling to Republican voters and donors that they are Democrats who do not want our support .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
There are two important things we’ve learned about former National Security Adviser John Bolton since a draft section of his upcoming book was leaked to the press:
Though these perspectives are commonly held by those who have worked with Bolton over the decades, it seems mainstream media is oblivious to them. They didn’t used to be. The evidence about Bolton that supports these premises came from left-leaning publications. But all is forgotten now that Bolton is the golden boy for Democrats and seems to be justification for Republicans like Senator Susan Collins to do side with them, as usual.
We know… ? Mainstream media lies
? Adam Schiff lies
? John Bolton lies If @SenatorCollins (or any other Republican Senator) willfully sides with liars, they will be anathema to Republican voters and donors. Those who believe lies do so because they WANT to believe them. https://t.co/Wsj7uxGR8H — JD Rucker (@JDRucker) January 27, 2020
Calls for additional witnesses have hit a fever pitch following the Bolton leak, and Collins signaled it may be enough to push her over the edge when it a vote.
“From the beginning, I’ve said that in fairness to both parties the decision on whether or not to call witnesses should be made after both the House managers and the President’s attorneys have had the opportunity to present their cases. “I’ve always said that I was likely to vote to call witnesses, just as I did in the 1999 Clinton trial. “The reports about John Bolton’s book strengthen the case for witnesses and have prompted a number of conversations among my colleagues.”
But there’s a major flaw in her thinking. If she is to believe the Bolton book strengthens the case to call him as a witness, she is acknowledging the credibility of the mainstream media sources who reported the leak, Democrats such as Adam Schiff who have promoted every negative aspect of the Ukraine affair, and John Bolton himself. All three have been demonstrated to be liars. Meanwhile, all of the actual evidence that is NOT a hearsay account points to the fact that the President did nothing wrong and the entire impeachment debacle is a partisan sham.
Her colleagues in the Senate understand this for the most part. Every Republican in the House and a handful or Democrats understood it as well. Whatever it is that’s motivating Collins and other Republican Senators who want more witnesses, we know for sure it’s not honesty or intellect.
Make no mistake. If Susan Collins and other Republican Senators vote for more witnesses in this partisan impeachment process, they are signaling to Republican voters and donors that they are Democrats who do not want our support.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-27--Mark Meadows highlights major flaw in Democrats’ impeachment premise

Democrats have long asserted that President Trump was looking for political favors when he asked Ukraine to help investigate 2016 election interference and the Bidens ’ dealings with Burisma .
They even go so far as to say the President withheld aid to achieve his goal .
But as Representative Mark Meadows points out , the evidence seems to show the Democrats are wrong about the President ’ s goals .
It is not contested that the President asked Ukraine for a favor .
Even before Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi announced an impeachment inquiry , the President had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President Zelensky to be released .
Oddly , many on the left still contend that the President has been hiding what he asked from Zelensky ever AFTER he released the transcript .
He ’ s not hiding the fact that he asked for assistance .
He ’ s been extremely forthcoming about it .
Democrats have challenged his motivations , but Meadows points out facts that support the President ’ s claims .
The President went after corruption that influenced our last election and threatened to influence the next .
That ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but the Democrats want him removed from office for it .
As Meadows points out , which deliverable came through ?
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Democrats have long asserted that President Trump was looking for political favors when he asked Ukraine to help investigate 2016 election interference and the Bidens’ dealings with Burisma. They even go so far as to say the President withheld aid to achieve his goal. But as Representative Mark Meadows points out, the evidence seems to show the Democrats are wrong about the President’s goals.
It is not contested that the President asked Ukraine for a favor. Even before Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi announced an impeachment inquiry, the President had ordered the transcript of his call with President Zelensky to be released. Oddly, many on the left still contend that the President has been hiding what he asked from Zelensky ever AFTER he released the transcript. He’s not hiding the fact that he asked for assistance. He’s been extremely forthcoming about it. Democrats have challenged his motivations, but Meadows points out facts that support the President’s claims.
This impeachment comes down to two possible ‘deliverables:’ one political, one about corruption. Democrats, without evidence, insist it was political. Trump says it was anti-corruption. Ukraine delivered no political investigations. But they DID pass anti-corruption measures. — Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) January 27, 2020
The President went after corruption that influenced our last election and threatened to influence the next. That’s part of his job as President, but the Democrats want him removed from office for it. As Meadows points out, which deliverable came through?
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-27--Lies, vendettas, and ego: John Bolton’s history of retaliation through falsehoods

In 2002 , nearly everyone in the U.S. intelligence community was focused on finding and punishing anyone who was involved in the 9/11 terrorist attacks the year before as well as preventing future attacks from taking place .
But the State Department ’ s undersecretary for arms control issues , John Bolton , had three goals he was juggling simultaneously .
He pressed these goals with as much vigor as his position allowed , giving him a direct line to President George Bush and more importantly to Vice President Dick Cheney .
His first goal is well documented .
Bolton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for selling the notion of “ Weapons of Mass Destruction ” ( WMDs ) being in the hands of Saddam Hussein ’ s Iraq .
While it ’ s unclear whether he truly believed the WMDs were there or if he was using them as an excuse to push for a march into Baghdad , analysis after-the-fact has demonstrated the so-called evidence for WMDs was not compelling on its own .
Moreover , there were troves of alternative intelligence that refuted the limited intelligence supporting the presence of WMDs .
In other words @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the data , such as Bolton , would have to be either completely unqualified to assess the information or were willfully misleading Americans to use it as a predicate for war .
As Jon Schwarz noted in 2016 in The Intercept , Bolton “ is arguably the man most responsible for hiding the truth about Iraq ’ s nonexistent WMDs.
” Cuba was his second priority in 2002 .
Yes , Cuba .
For some reason , his strange theories about Cuba have been partially wiped from his history ; it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ assertions regarding Cuba on any government websites .
The Bolton stance on Cuba , that they were developing advanced chemical weapons to use on the United States in the very near future , was essentially debunked and cleared from intelligence reports by the Obama administration .
To this day , there are no indications that a chemical weapons program had ever been started in Cuba , let alone anywhere near Bolton ’ s 18-year-old claim that they were an imminent threat .
According to center-left investigative news outlet ProPublica , Bolton ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with his unfounded assertion that Cuba was developing chemical weapons .
Bolton , who was then the State Department ’ s undersecretary for arms control issues , included a warning about the Cuban threat in a draft of a speech and sent it around the department for the necessary clearance .
A biological warfare analyst wrote back that Bolton ’ s proposed comments overstated what U.S. intelligence agencies really knew about the matter , and , as routinely happens , suggested some small changes .
The analyst was summoned to Bolton ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the face , and shaking his finger at me , and explained to me that I was acting way beyond my position , ” the analyst , Christian Westermann , recalled later during a Senate inquiry .
Bolton then demanded that Westermann ’ s supervisor remove him permanently from the biological weapons portfolio , thundering that “ he wasn ’ t going to be told what he could say by a mid-level munchkin.
” His third priority started long before 9/11 and has continued until this day .
It is also the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because many attribute his Iranian regime change obsession as the reason he was sacked by President Trump last year .
It could also be what motivated him to write in his upcoming book that President Trump told him aid to Ukraine was being withheld until they announced investigations into Democrats and the Bidens .
As far-left Mother Jones noted last year , Bolton has been obsessed with Iran for decades .
As a diplomat and national security official across four Republican administrations , from Ronald Reagan to Donald Trump , Bolton has made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Korea and Syria , among other places .
But Iran remained a persistent concern for him , due to its alleged links to terrorism and burgeoning nuclear program .
Once he left his position as ambassador to the United Nations in the Bush White House in 2006 , he began more openly criticizing Bush ’ s Iran policy as too soft , calling it “ four and a half years of failed diplomacy.
” In an appearance on Fox News in 2008 , Bolton argued in favor of bombing Iranian camps that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American troops in Iraq .
“ This is not provocative or preemptive—this is entirely responsive , ” he said .
“ If we don ’ t respond , the Iranians will take it as a sign of weakness.
” Bolton ’ s history has been pocked by lies , vendettas , and an ego that prevents him from ever being wrong in his own mind .
Even today , he remains in the scant camp of people who still believe invading Iraq and Afghanistan were good ideas that somehow benefited America .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the quagmire of Iraq was not beneficial to us , Iraq , or the Middle East in general .
As for Afghanistan , anyone who has heard anything about the Afghanistan Papers published last month would likely come to the same conclusion about our extended presence there .
Yet , Bolton has remained a firm believer in both failed missions .
He believes he was right from the start and any insinuations to the contrary are met with indignation and rage .
Much of Bolton ’ s reputation for lying about and intimidating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his Senate hearings when he was nominated to become the U.S .
Ambassador to the United Nations in 2005 .
Among the 35 people interviewed were several who called into question his personality for the role .
He was referenced as one who was willing to lie ( something he affirmed in an interview five years later ) about those who criticized him .
They said he would “ bully ” and “ intimidate ” people who disagreed with him .
But most notably were instances documented in which he was accused of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had wronged him , a trait they said would manifest for years .
Former CIA analyst Fulton Armstrong learned this the hard way when he challenged Bolton ’ s assessment on Cuba .
Armstrong was an expert on Havana policies and saw nothing in the intelligence that indicated they were exploring advanced chemical weapons , let alone being on the verge of launching these weapons at Miami very soon , as Bolton attested .
How did Bolton respond to the dissenting view ?
In his Senate hearing , he said he had “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interviews and the Senate report indicate that the campaign against Armstrong lasted for years .
One senator described it as “ a vendetta.
” The timing of the leak to the press in which he claims President Trump spilled damaging information about Ukraine has drawn scrutiny from the right .
They note how convenient it is that the leak happens to coincide perfectly with the launch of his Amazon page for his book ’ s pre-sale orders .
It also comes at a time just before the Senate is to vote on witnesses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
What we know of Bolton ’ s past jibes with the scrutiny now being placed on him .
It fits with his dedication to vengeance ; lying to help remove President Trump from office , whether through impeachment or at the ballot box in November , is about the most Boltonesque thing one can do .
The increased book sales is a cherry on top , not his primary goal , contrary to popular theories floating around on social media .
Most John Bolton skeptics are pointing to increasing book sales as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But the much more likely motivation for calling out President Trump is found in his history of petty ego-boosting and an unquenchable thirst for vengeance .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
In 2002, nearly everyone in the U.S. intelligence community was focused on finding and punishing anyone who was involved in the 9/11 terrorist attacks the year before as well as preventing future attacks from taking place. But the State Department’s undersecretary for arms control issues, John Bolton, had three goals he was juggling simultaneously. He pressed these goals with as much vigor as his position allowed, giving him a direct line to President George Bush and more importantly to Vice President Dick Cheney.
His first goal is well documented. Bolton was the architect and most outspoken proponent for selling the notion of “Weapons of Mass Destruction” (WMDs) being in the hands of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. While it’s unclear whether he truly believed the WMDs were there or if he was using them as an excuse to push for a march into Baghdad, analysis after-the-fact has demonstrated the so-called evidence for WMDs was not compelling on its own. Moreover, there were troves of alternative intelligence that refuted the limited intelligence supporting the presence of WMDs. In other words, anyone who had access to all of the data, such as Bolton, would have to be either completely unqualified to assess the information or were willfully misleading Americans to use it as a predicate for war. As Jon Schwarz noted in 2016 in The Intercept, Bolton “is arguably the man most responsible for hiding the truth about Iraq’s nonexistent WMDs.”
Cuba was his second priority in 2002. Yes, Cuba. For some reason, his strange theories about Cuba have been partially wiped from his history; it’s hard to find anything about his assertions regarding Cuba on any government websites. The Bolton stance on Cuba, that they were developing advanced chemical weapons to use on the United States in the very near future, was essentially debunked and cleared from intelligence reports by the Obama administration. To this day, there are no indications that a chemical weapons program had ever been started in Cuba, let alone anywhere near Bolton’s 18-year-old claim that they were an imminent threat.
According to center-left investigative news outlet ProPublica, Bolton’s vindictive nature was apparent even when dealing with his unfounded assertion that Cuba was developing chemical weapons.
Bolton, who was then the State Department’s undersecretary for arms control issues, included a warning about the Cuban threat in a draft of a speech and sent it around the department for the necessary clearance. A biological warfare analyst wrote back that Bolton’s proposed comments overstated what U.S. intelligence agencies really knew about the matter, and, as routinely happens, suggested some small changes. The analyst was summoned to Bolton’s office. “He got very red in the face, and shaking his finger at me, and explained to me that I was acting way beyond my position,” the analyst, Christian Westermann, recalled later during a Senate inquiry. Bolton then demanded that Westermann’s supervisor remove him permanently from the biological weapons portfolio, thundering that “he wasn’t going to be told what he could say by a mid-level munchkin.”
His third priority started long before 9/11 and has continued until this day. It is also the most relevant portion of his sordid tale because many attribute his Iranian regime change obsession as the reason he was sacked by President Trump last year. It could also be what motivated him to write in his upcoming book that President Trump told him aid to Ukraine was being withheld until they announced investigations into Democrats and the Bidens. As far-left Mother Jones noted last year, Bolton has been obsessed with Iran for decades.
As a diplomat and national security official across four Republican administrations, from Ronald Reagan to Donald Trump, Bolton has made the case for regime change in North Korea and Syria, among other places. But Iran remained a persistent concern for him, due to its alleged links to terrorism and burgeoning nuclear program. Once he left his position as ambassador to the United Nations in the Bush White House in 2006, he began more openly criticizing Bush’s Iran policy as too soft, calling it “four and a half years of failed diplomacy.” In an appearance on Fox News in 2008, Bolton argued in favor of bombing Iranian camps that the US said were training insurgents to oppose American troops in Iraq. “This is not provocative or preemptive—this is entirely responsive,” he said. “If we don’t respond, the Iranians will take it as a sign of weakness.”
Bolton’s history has been pocked by lies, vendettas, and an ego that prevents him from ever being wrong in his own mind. Even today, he remains in the scant camp of people who still believe invading Iraq and Afghanistan were good ideas that somehow benefited America. It is widely believed committing our troops to the quagmire of Iraq was not beneficial to us, Iraq, or the Middle East in general. As for Afghanistan, anyone who has heard anything about the Afghanistan Papers published last month would likely come to the same conclusion about our extended presence there. Yet, Bolton has remained a firm believer in both failed missions. He believes he was right from the start and any insinuations to the contrary are met with indignation and rage.
Much of Bolton’s reputation for lying about and intimidating those who crossed him came out in his Senate hearings when he was nominated to become the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations in 2005. Among the 35 people interviewed were several who called into question his personality for the role. He was referenced as one who was willing to lie (something he affirmed in an interview five years later) about those who criticized him. They said he would “bully” and “intimidate” people who disagreed with him. But most notably were instances documented in which he was accused of “retaliating” against those he believed had wronged him, a trait they said would manifest for years.
Former CIA analyst Fulton Armstrong learned this the hard way when he challenged Bolton’s assessment on Cuba. Armstrong was an expert on Havana policies and saw nothing in the intelligence that indicated they were exploring advanced chemical weapons, let alone being on the verge of launching these weapons at Miami very soon, as Bolton attested. How did Bolton respond to the dissenting view? In his Senate hearing, he said he had “one conversation” about Armstrong, but interviews and the Senate report indicate that the campaign against Armstrong lasted for years. One senator described it as “a vendetta.”
The timing of the leak to the press in which he claims President Trump spilled damaging information about Ukraine has drawn scrutiny from the right. They note how convenient it is that the leak happens to coincide perfectly with the launch of his Amazon page for his book’s pre-sale orders. It also comes at a time just before the Senate is to vote on witnesses for the President’s impeachment trial. What we know of Bolton’s past jibes with the scrutiny now being placed on him. It fits with his dedication to vengeance; lying to help remove President Trump from office, whether through impeachment or at the ballot box in November, is about the most Boltonesque thing one can do. The increased book sales is a cherry on top, not his primary goal, contrary to popular theories floating around on social media.
Most John Bolton skeptics are pointing to increasing book sales as the reason for his Ukraine revelations. But the much more likely motivation for calling out President Trump is found in his history of petty ego-boosting and an unquenchable thirst for vengeance.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-01-27--Democrats and mainstream media have turned impeachment into ‘The Bachelor’

Perhaps it is cosmic irony that the impeachment trial in the Senate kicked off at roughly the same time as the new season of ABC ’ s “ The Bachelor ” .
Both ask their audiences to suspend disbelief to an extent that would make a confirmed fabulist grind his or her teeth .
Consider the way that vapid 20-somethings on The Bachelor and The Bachelorette constantly make obviously false statements .
“ I ’ m already developing feelings for you , ” said in week 3 by some dental hygienist or “ marketing executive ” who met the titular @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other suitors .
Or the common laments of emotional anguish from people like Bachelor Pete , who is already bemoaning how “ confused ” he is because he ’ s not sure if everyone on the show is there “ for the right reasons ” .
( Again – week 3 . )
Sure , Pete , all these ladies signed up for this gig because of their deep , abiding affection for you as a person .
If I thought this was sincere , I would avoid Delta flights where Pilot Pete @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like… weather .
That said , the things being said about impeachment by Democrats and their sycophants in the national media are equally vapid .
Witness Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler , who perverted the process in the House of Representatives as brazenly as possible .
Along with other charlatans like Chuck Schumer , they now insist that additional witnesses must be allowed .
Mind you , they couldn ’ t be bothered to get the witnesses they now crave when they had complete control of the process in the House .
Rather @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when it refused to provide requested witnesses , the House took a pass .
Why , you ask ?
Because according to these same people , this “ somber ” , “ prayerful ” process had to be rushed so that Trump could not “ steal another election ” .
But now they want to take the extra time to subpoena , depose and call these witnesses in the Senate ?
Has the timing of the November election been changed ?
If the House of Representatives wanted to challenge the White House ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ courts would have been the appropriate place to do that .
By definition , the judiciary is the branch that is supposed to settle disputes between the legislative and the executive .
But Schiff et al couldn ’ t be bothered to do that – the fate of the republic hung in the balance !
( they said ) .
However , now that there ’ s an opportunity to score political points by saying Senate Republicans are engaging in a “ cover-up ” , we have all the time in the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should be subpoenaed according to the left .
GOP witnesses would only serve as an attempt at distraction and a “ media circus ” .
Do Congressional Democrats think people are this stupid ?
Do they believe that independents and swing voters do not recognize this for what it is ?
Apparently , they do .
But speaking as a non-Trump supporter and non-Republican , I find it all insultingly transparent and self-serving .
The clear point of their efforts is not the truth , or the republic , or anything that Alexander @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Regardless of how many slobbering Twitter love letters Schiff ’ s performance got from the Paul Begalas and “ conservative ” Jennifer Rubins of the world , the performances being offered by the Democrats are naked , brazen political theater whose only purpose is to score points in advance of the 2020 election .
If you want to support this behavior because you want to hurt Trump/Republicans by any means possible , so be it .
But don ’ t embarrass yourself by pretending that you believe the lofty rhetoric being offered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so will make you seem gullible .
One of the reasons why I hate-watch The Bachelor is because I get a laugh as I listen to these buffoonish seekers of “ love ” plod around beautiful , exotic locations saying ridiculously unbelievable things – “ I just know my spouse is in the crowd of 20 strangers.
” When such nonsense is being offered by silly reality TV shows , there ’ s a pleasurable infuriation that it provides .
But when brazen lies and absurd assertions come from the national “ news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the federal government… not so much .
Given the way that they are trying to gaslight the public , and the minimal effort they put into making it seem plausible , I ’ m beginning to wonder if Schiff , Schumer and the national media are doing this… for the right reasons .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Perhaps it is cosmic irony that the impeachment trial in the Senate kicked off at roughly the same time as the new season of ABC’s “The Bachelor”. Both ask their audiences to suspend disbelief to an extent that would make a confirmed fabulist grind his or her teeth.
Consider the way that vapid 20-somethings on The Bachelor and The Bachelorette constantly make obviously false statements. “I’m already developing feelings for you,” said in week 3 by some dental hygienist or “marketing executive” who met the titular character a few days earlier…along with 20 other suitors. Or the common laments of emotional anguish from people like Bachelor Pete, who is already bemoaning how “confused” he is because he’s not sure if everyone on the show is there “for the right reasons”. (Again – week 3.) Sure, Pete, all these ladies signed up for this gig because of their deep, abiding affection for you as a person. If I thought this was sincere, I would avoid Delta flights where Pilot Pete might be confronted with a perplexing situation like… weather.
That said, the things being said about impeachment by Democrats and their sycophants in the national media are equally vapid. Witness Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler, who perverted the process in the House of Representatives as brazenly as possible. Along with other charlatans like Chuck Schumer, they now insist that additional witnesses must be allowed. Mind you, they couldn’t be bothered to get the witnesses they now crave when they had complete control of the process in the House. Rather than challenge the White House in court when it refused to provide requested witnesses, the House took a pass. Why, you ask? Because according to these same people, this “somber”, “prayerful” process had to be rushed so that Trump could not “steal another election”. But now they want to take the extra time to subpoena, depose and call these witnesses in the Senate? Has the timing of the November election been changed?
If the House of Representatives wanted to challenge the White House’s refusal to provide witnesses, the courts would have been the appropriate place to do that. By definition, the judiciary is the branch that is supposed to settle disputes between the legislative and the executive. But Schiff et al couldn’t be bothered to do that – the fate of the republic hung in the balance! (they said). However, now that there’s an opportunity to score political points by saying Senate Republicans are engaging in a “cover-up”, we have all the time in the world? Mind you, only Democrat witness should be subpoenaed according to the left. GOP witnesses would only serve as an attempt at distraction and a “media circus”.
Do Congressional Democrats think people are this stupid? Do they believe that independents and swing voters do not recognize this for what it is? Apparently, they do. But speaking as a non-Trump supporter and non-Republican, I find it all insultingly transparent and self-serving.
The clear point of their efforts is not the truth, or the republic, or anything that Alexander Hamilton may have said on the subject. Regardless of how many slobbering Twitter love letters Schiff’s performance got from the Paul Begalas and “conservative” Jennifer Rubins of the world, the performances being offered by the Democrats are naked, brazen political theater whose only purpose is to score points in advance of the 2020 election.
If you want to support this behavior because you want to hurt Trump/Republicans by any means possible, so be it. But don’t embarrass yourself by pretending that you believe the lofty rhetoric being offered by politicos feigning noble intent. Doing so will make you seem gullible.
One of the reasons why I hate-watch The Bachelor is because I get a laugh as I listen to these buffoonish seekers of “love” plod around beautiful, exotic locations saying ridiculously unbelievable things – “I just know my spouse is in the crowd of 20 strangers.” When such nonsense is being offered by silly reality TV shows, there’s a pleasurable infuriation that it provides. But when brazen lies and absurd assertions come from the national “news” media, our elected officials and the federal government… not so much.
Given the way that they are trying to gaslight the public, and the minimal effort they put into making it seem plausible, I’m beginning to wonder if Schiff, Schumer and the national media are doing this… for the right reasons.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!