noqreport--2020-02-11--MS-13 member wanted for homicide arrested during 2-state enforcement efforts

DETROIT — An MS-13 gang member , in the country illegally and wanted in El Salvador for homicide , was arrested last week by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ’ s ( ICE ) Enforcement and Removal Operations ( ERO ) during ongoing enforcement efforts in Michigan and Ohio targeting at-large criminal aliens , illegal reentrants and other immigration violators .
“ ICE officers are first and foremost focused on removing criminal aliens from the community , ” said Rebecca Adducci , field office director of ICE ERO in Michigan and Ohio .
“ I applaud the dedicated men and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work tirelessly to keep our communities safe , often in the face of great personal danger.
” • In Wyoming , Michigan , a 52-year-old citizen of Mexico , who has convictions for possession of cocaine , DUI , and operating while impaired .
• In Galloway , Ohio , an MS-13 gang member charged by Salvadoran authorities with organized terrorism ( gang membership ) , aggravated homicide , creating danger to national security and public peace .
He is the subject of an Interpol Red Notice .
• In Warren , Ohio @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has convictions for carjacking and operating a vehicle under the influence .
• In Detroit , a 53-year-old citizen of Honduras who has convictions for operating with ability impaired and twice for operating under the influence of liquor – 2nd offense .
• In Sterling Heights , Michigan , a 55-year-old citizen of Iraq , who has convictions for larceny in a building , delivery of a cocaine , breaking and entering an automobile with damage , delivery and manufacturing ecstasy , delivery and manufacturing marijuana , possession of cocaine , and possession @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nationals of Albania , Bosnia and Herzegovina , Brazil , Burkina Faso , Cambodia , Costa Rica , El Salvador , Guatemala , Guinea , Honduras , Iraq , Israel and the Occupied Territories , Jamaica , Lebanon , Mexico , Nigeria , Saudi Arabia , Serbia , Thailand , Trinidad and Tobago , and Tunisia .
From Feb. 1-7 , ICE arrested 75 foreign nationals , 70 percent of whom had prior arrests and/or criminal convictions .
Convictions included : retail fraud , illegal entry , operating while ability impaired , operating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influence , operating intoxicated , operating a vehicle impaired , domestic violence , public intoxication , possession of marijuana , use of marijuana , larceny in a building , delivery of controlled substance , to wit : cocaine , breaking and entering an automobile with damage , drug charges , disorderly person , disorderly conduct , malicious destruction of property , stalking – personal protection order violation , impaired driving by controlled substance , driving with a , operating a vehicle while intoxicated endangering a person , physical control of vehicle while under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to pay registration fee , criminal sexual conduct , minor in possession of alcohol , disturbing the peace , aggravated assault , assault and battery , , tampering with evidence , carjacking , corruption of a minor , among others .
ERO officers were assisted by ICE Homeland Security Investigations and U.S. Border Patrol during the enforcement efforts .
ICE officers carry out targeted enforcement actions every day in locations around the country as part of the agency ’ s ongoing efforts to protect the nation , uphold public safety , and protect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ border controls .
ICE focuses its limited resources first and foremost by targeting those who pose the greatest threat to public safety and border security , and our officers make arrests every single day .
The agency ’ s arrest statistics clearly reflect this .
Nationally , approximately 86 percent of ERO ’ s administrative arrests during fiscal year 2019 either had a criminal conviction or were facing criminal charges at the time of their arrest .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
DETROIT — An MS-13 gang member, in the country illegally and wanted in El Salvador for homicide, was arrested last week by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) during ongoing enforcement efforts in Michigan and Ohio targeting at-large criminal aliens, illegal reentrants and other immigration violators.
“ICE officers are first and foremost focused on removing criminal aliens from the community,” said Rebecca Adducci, field office director of ICE ERO in Michigan and Ohio. “I applaud the dedicated men and women of ICE and our partners who work tirelessly to keep our communities safe, often in the face of great personal danger.”
Recent arrests include:
In Wyoming, Michigan, a 52-year-old citizen of Mexico, who has convictions for possession of cocaine, DUI, and operating while impaired.
In Galloway, Ohio, an MS-13 gang member charged by Salvadoran authorities with organized terrorism (gang membership), aggravated homicide, creating danger to national security and public peace. He is the subject of an Interpol Red Notice.
In Warren, Ohio, 41-year-old citizen of Serbia, who has convictions for carjacking and operating a vehicle under the influence.
In Detroit, a 53-year-old citizen of Honduras who has convictions for operating with ability impaired and twice for operating under the influence of liquor – 2nd offense.
In Sterling Heights, Michigan, a 55-year-old citizen of Iraq, who has convictions for larceny in a building, delivery of a cocaine, breaking and entering an automobile with damage, delivery and manufacturing ecstasy, delivery and manufacturing marijuana, possession of cocaine, and possession of analogues.
The individuals arrested were nationals of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guinea, Honduras, Iraq, Israel and the Occupied Territories, Jamaica, Lebanon, Mexico, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, and Tunisia.
From Feb. 1-7, ICE arrested 75 foreign nationals, 70 percent of whom had prior arrests and/or criminal convictions. Convictions included: retail fraud, illegal entry, operating while ability impaired, operating under the influence, operating under the influence, operating intoxicated, operating a vehicle impaired, domestic violence, public intoxication, possession of marijuana, use of marijuana, larceny in a building, delivery of controlled substance, to wit: cocaine, breaking and entering an automobile with damage, drug charges, disorderly person, disorderly conduct, malicious destruction of property, stalking – personal protection order violation, impaired driving by controlled substance, driving with a, operating a vehicle while intoxicated endangering a person, physical control of vehicle while under the influence, sex offenders – failing to pay registration fee, criminal sexual conduct, minor in possession of alcohol, disturbing the peace, aggravated assault, assault and battery,, tampering with evidence, carjacking, corruption of a minor, among others.
ERO officers were assisted by ICE Homeland Security Investigations and U.S. Border Patrol during the enforcement efforts.
ICE officers carry out targeted enforcement actions every day in locations around the country as part of the agency’s ongoing efforts to protect the nation, uphold public safety, and protect the integrity of our immigration laws and border controls.
ICE focuses its limited resources first and foremost by targeting those who pose the greatest threat to public safety and border security, and our officers make arrests every single day. The agency’s arrest statistics clearly reflect this. Nationally, approximately 86 percent of ERO’s administrative arrests during fiscal year 2019 either had a criminal conviction or were facing criminal charges at the time of their arrest.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-12--Egypt: Rights activist detained, allegedly tortured

( Beirut ) – Egyptian authorities on February 7 , 2020 detained Patrick George Zaki , a researcher with the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights ( EIPR ) , in a serious escalation of their campaign against human rights activists and groups , Human Rights Watch said today .
A source at the rights organization told Human Rights Watch that the National Security Agency held George incommunicado for roughly 24 hours and subjected him to torture , including with electric shocks .
He was held in two unofficial National Security Agency detention sites , in Cairo and al-Mansoura , where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the EIPR , the source said .
‘ Instead of facilitating the much-needed work of human rights defenders like Patrick George Zaki , security forces detained and allegedly tortured him , ’ said Joe Stork , deputy Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch .
‘ President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi ’ s government seems intent on emphasizing that no one is immune from the security services ’ brutal hand.
’ Zaki works for the EIPR on gender and sexuality rights .
Authorities arrested him upon his arrival at Cairo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been living and studying .
After 24 hours , prosecutors ordered Zaki detained pending an investigation , accusing him of actions including ‘ calling for protests without permission , ’ ‘ spreading false news , ’ and inciting violence and terrorism .
The EIPR source said that most of the interrogation concerned Zaki ’ s Facebook posts and that his detention report , according to Zaki ’ s lawyers who reviewed it , falsely claimed that officers arrested Zaki at his home in al-Mansoura , not at the airport .
The EIPR is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rights organizations .
The organization and several of its current and former staff members , including its founder and former director Hossam Bahgat , have been prosecuted in the year-long investigation in Case 173 of 2011 , known as the ‘ foreign funding ’ case .
Egyptian authorities have been using the case to prosecute leading human rights organizations and activists for doing their work and for receiving foreign funds .
An investigative judge and a court have ordered preventive travel bans and asset freezes on the defendants that have been in force @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a trial has yet to begin .
Attacks , arrests , and prosecutions of human rights defenders have been escalating in recent months .
Gamal Eid , the director of the independent Arab Network for Human Rights Information , was assaulted twice by armed men , in October and December 2019 , in what appeared to be attacks sponsored or carried out by National Security officers and agents .
Ibrahim Ezz el Din , a housing rights researcher at the Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms , has been ordered detained since November @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was taken before the prosecution , security officers forcibly disappeared him for 167 days .
Lawyers told Human Rights Watch that during Ezz el-Din ’ s disappearance , officers physically and psychologically tortured him , including with electric shocks , while questioning him about his activism .
Prosecutors failed to investigate his disappearance or torture and ordered him detained on charges solely related to his peaceful activism .
‘ The escalating attacks on human rights defenders , including disappearances , torture , and physical assaults in broad daylight , show that Egypt under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ where those who defend human rights do so at grave risk to themselves , ’ Stork said .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
(Beirut) – Egyptian authorities on February 7, 2020 detained Patrick George Zaki, a researcher with the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR), in a serious escalation of their campaign against human rights activists and groups, Human Rights Watch said today.
A source at the rights organization told Human Rights Watch that the National Security Agency held George incommunicado for roughly 24 hours and subjected him to torture, including with electric shocks. He was held in two unofficial National Security Agency detention sites, in Cairo and al-Mansoura, where interrogators questioned him extensively about his activism and the EIPR, the source said.
‘Instead of facilitating the much-needed work of human rights defenders like Patrick George Zaki, security forces detained and allegedly tortured him,’ said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. ‘President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi’s government seems intent on emphasizing that no one is immune from the security services’ brutal hand.’
Zaki works for the EIPR on gender and sexuality rights. Authorities arrested him upon his arrival at Cairo Airport from Italy, where he has been living and studying.
After 24 hours, prosecutors ordered Zaki detained pending an investigation, accusing him of actions including ‘calling for protests without permission,’ ‘spreading false news,’ and inciting violence and terrorism. The EIPR source said that most of the interrogation concerned Zaki’s Facebook posts and that his detention report, according to Zaki’s lawyers who reviewed it, falsely claimed that officers arrested Zaki at his home in al-Mansoura, not at the airport.
The EIPR is one of Egypt’s leading human rights organizations. The organization and several of its current and former staff members, including its founder and former director Hossam Bahgat, have been prosecuted in the year-long investigation in Case 173 of 2011, known as the ‘foreign funding’ case. Egyptian authorities have been using the case to prosecute leading human rights organizations and activists for doing their work and for receiving foreign funds. An investigative judge and a court have ordered preventive travel bans and asset freezes on the defendants that have been in force for almost four years now, but a trial has yet to begin.
Attacks, arrests, and prosecutions of human rights defenders have been escalating in recent months.
Gamal Eid, the director of the independent Arab Network for Human Rights Information, was assaulted twice by armed men, in October and December 2019, in what appeared to be attacks sponsored or carried out by National Security officers and agents.
Ibrahim Ezz el Din, a housing rights researcher at the Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms, has been ordered detained since November by State Security prosecutors. Before he was taken before the prosecution, security officers forcibly disappeared him for 167 days. Lawyers told Human Rights Watch that during Ezz el-Din’s disappearance, officers physically and psychologically tortured him, including with electric shocks, while questioning him about his activism. Prosecutors failed to investigate his disappearance or torture and ordered him detained on charges solely related to his peaceful activism.
‘The escalating attacks on human rights defenders, including disappearances, torture, and physical assaults in broad daylight, show that Egypt under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi is a place where those who defend human rights do so at grave risk to themselves,’ Stork said.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]
Dr. Joseph Mercola said, “Synthetic meat is the epitome of ultraprocessed food, and it seems naïve to think it won’t have health effects similar to other ultraprocessed junk foods.” For All-American REAL beef raised in pastures, sous vide, then freeze-dried for long-term storage, visit Whole Cows and use promo code “no junk” at checkout.


noqreport--2020-02-12--Former foster care recipients came to Ben Carson with a problem. Together, they solved it.

The United States government has its hands in everything .
It ’ s gargantuan , much larger than our founders could have ever dreamed and big enough to make conservatives today cringe .
But there are times when government programs shine through as worthy and righteous because they solve real problems that truly do require government involvement .
Such is the case of Housing and Urban Development ’ s new initiative , the Foster Youth to Independence program .
HUD Secretary Ben Carson worked with those who had been directly affected by the foster care program in our nation to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it provides a way for those who “ age out ” of foster care to get their feet underneath them before going at it on their own .
With 5,000 young Americans a year becoming homeless after aging out—at 18- to 21-years of age , depending on the state—it ’ s clear the system hasn ’ t prepared everyone for adult life on their own .
That ’ s where the FYI program comes in to help .
“ The most remarkable thing about FYI program being implemented is the timeline , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ told NOQ Report .
“ As a number of the interviewees now , it was implemented only four months after the time it was pitched to Carson by the youth.
” Jekielek is host of American Thought Leaders , the show that produced the video above .
They interviewed several people involved with visualizing , pitching , developing , and implementing the initiative through HUD , and as Jekielek noted , they did so at an incredible pace considering it involved the federal government .
But Carson , a world-renowned neurosurgeon and former @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a man of action .
“ When you ’ re in the system , housing is not a thought that you would think would go away at any moment until you ’ re in that last year when the social workers are kind of banging it into your head , ” said program participant Adaora Onuora .
“ So , that , I would say , is number one .
Housing , stability , how you ’ re going to fend for yourself.
” The system before the FYI Initiative allowed many who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lives in foster care simply fall through the cracks once they were emancipated and no longer a ward of the state .
Many Americans rely on family and friends to help them transition from childhood to adulthood , but that ’ s not the case for many foster children .
They are often plunged into the real world without a support system in place to help them transition .
That ’ s why the FYI Initiative is so important .
It bridges the gap for those who need such assistance the most .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It ’ s one that has been swept under the rug for years .
But as Jekielek found out in his interviews , the predictability of the phenomenon is one of the reasons the solution became so easily apparent .
“ Well , it ’ s interesting because the phenomenon that you described , that 5,000 young people will age out into homelessness every year , has been going on for many , many years , ” said Ruth Anne White , Executive Director for the National Center for Housing and Child @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Republican Congressman named Mike Turner from Ohio , one of the offices we worked very closely on this with , who figured out this was an entirely predictable problem.
” The initiative allows those coming out of foster care to have the security they need to establish themselves and prepare for being on their own .
Instead of six months , which was how the old system worked , emancipated former foster children have three years of support during which time they can go to school or work .
Initially , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the proposal , but HUD officials did not want to make it a partisan issue .
Instead , the time-limit requirement gave those in need sufficient resources to push forward without allowing them to take advantage of the system indefinitely .
The most impressive part of this program is how quickly it was brought to life .
In DC , things rarely move in terms of weeks or months .
It takes years to get many programs up and running , but because the need was great and the people behind it motivated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to go from inception to roll out .
One of the reasons it defied most expectations was because the initiative ’ s creators used preexisting rules and programs to piece it together , limiting requirements for approval and giving it the streamlined contours necessary for such fast implementation .
“ It ’ s also remarkable that the youth organization figured out how to leverage existing rules to make sure every foster child leaving the system can have a home while they get on their feet , ” Jekielek said .
A remarkable and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Secretary Ben Carson with an idea .
Together , they turned it into a plan to help those in foster care stay off the streets and move into adulthood properly .
Today , the FYI Initiative is a reality .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us @ @ @ @

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
The United States government has its hands in everything. It’s gargantuan, much larger than our founders could have ever dreamed and big enough to make conservatives today cringe. But there are times when government programs shine through as worthy and righteous because they solve real problems that truly do require government involvement. Such is the case of Housing and Urban Development’s new initiative, the Foster Youth to Independence program.
HUD Secretary Ben Carson worked with those who had been directly affected by the foster care program in our nation to develop this initiative. In essence, it provides a way for those who “age out” of foster care to get their feet underneath them before going at it on their own. With 5,000 young Americans a year becoming homeless after aging out—at 18- to 21-years of age, depending on the state—it’s clear the system hasn’t prepared everyone for adult life on their own. That’s where the FYI program comes in to help.
“The most remarkable thing about FYI program being implemented is the timeline,” said Epoch Times Senior Editor Jan Jekielek told NOQ Report. “As a number of the interviewees now, it was implemented only four months after the time it was pitched to Carson by the youth.”
Jekielek is host of American Thought Leaders, the show that produced the video above. They interviewed several people involved with visualizing, pitching, developing, and implementing the initiative through HUD, and as Jekielek noted, they did so at an incredible pace considering it involved the federal government. But Carson, a world-renowned neurosurgeon and former presidential candidate before leading HUD, is a man of action.
“When you’re in the system, housing is not a thought that you would think would go away at any moment until you’re in that last year when the social workers are kind of banging it into your head,” said program participant Adaora Onuora. “So, that, I would say, is number one. Housing, stability, how you’re going to fend for yourself.”
The system before the FYI Initiative allowed many who had spent much or all of their lives in foster care simply fall through the cracks once they were emancipated and no longer a ward of the state. Many Americans rely on family and friends to help them transition from childhood to adulthood, but that’s not the case for many foster children. They are often plunged into the real world without a support system in place to help them transition. That’s why the FYI Initiative is so important. It bridges the gap for those who need such assistance the most.
Is this a new phenomenon? No. It’s one that has been swept under the rug for years. But as Jekielek found out in his interviews, the predictability of the phenomenon is one of the reasons the solution became so easily apparent.
“Well, it’s interesting because the phenomenon that you described, that 5,000 young people will age out into homelessness every year, has been going on for many, many years,” said Ruth Anne White, Executive Director for the National Center for Housing and Child Welfare. “And it was actually a Republican Congressman named Mike Turner from Ohio, one of the offices we worked very closely on this with, who figured out this was an entirely predictable problem.”
The initiative allows those coming out of foster care to have the security they need to establish themselves and prepare for being on their own. Instead of six months, which was how the old system worked, emancipated former foster children have three years of support during which time they can go to school or work. Initially, there was a work or school requirement in the proposal, but HUD officials did not want to make it a partisan issue. Instead, the time-limit requirement gave those in need sufficient resources to push forward without allowing them to take advantage of the system indefinitely.
The most impressive part of this program is how quickly it was brought to life. In DC, things rarely move in terms of weeks or months. It takes years to get many programs up and running, but because the need was great and the people behind it motivated, it took a mere four months to go from inception to roll out.
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!
One of the reasons it defied most expectations was because the initiative’s creators used preexisting rules and programs to piece it together, limiting requirements for approval and giving it the streamlined contours necessary for such fast implementation.
“It’s also remarkable that the youth organization figured out how to leverage existing rules to make sure every foster child leaving the system can have a home while they get on their feet,” Jekielek said.
A remarkable and motivated group of people went to HUD Secretary Ben Carson with an idea. Together, they turned it into a plan to help those in foster care stay off the streets and move into adulthood properly. Today, the FYI Initiative is a reality.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-13--UNHRC’s Michelle Bachelet put out an anti-Israel blacklist that highlights socialism’s oppression

A name that is rarely associated with Bernie Sanders , Elizabeth Warren , Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , or any other radical progressive politicians in America is Michelle Bachelet .
The former Chilean President and current U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights ( OHCHR ) may be unfamiliar to most Americans , but she is everything far-left American politicians hope to be someday .
Today , she released a “ blacklist ” of companies that do business in the “ illegally occupied ” territories in Israel , including East Jerusalem and parts of the West Bank .
This list was a dream @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Sanctions ( BDS ) movement because it lends credibility ( in name only ) to their actions against companies who are friendly with the Jewish state .
Both the United States and Israel withdrew from the United Nations Human Right Council two years ago as it was clear their goals revolved around harming Israel and Israel alone .
Despite clear human rights violations in Iran , Saudi Arabia , North Korea , Qatar , Nigeria , China , and dozens of nations that are more of a danger to their own people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ singular goal of the UNHRC is to delegitimize Israel ’ s very existence .
Anti-Semitism comes in many forms .
For the political far-left , that means attacking Israel with everything possible on political and economic fronts so as not to be seen as anti-Semitic .
They claim their attacks are not racially or religiously biased , but their actions tell a completely different story .
The notion that Israel is more of a human rights violating nation than countries that commit human rights violations daily is ridiculous , but the Marxists must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservatism in the United States .
Both represent an existential threat to the Marxist ideology because both Israeli and American conservatism operate on a basis of truth .
It ’ s like Kryptonite to the radical ideologies of people like Bachelet , Sanders , and France ’ s Emanuel Macron .
If you want to see how Bernie Sanders or other Marxists would act if given enough power , follow the actions of Michelle Bachelet .
Her brand of socialism may be global in nature , but it ’ s a key example @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
A name that is rarely associated with Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, or any other radical progressive politicians in America is Michelle Bachelet. The former Chilean President and current U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) may be unfamiliar to most Americans, but she is everything far-left American politicians hope to be someday.
Today, she released a “blacklist” of companies that do business in the “illegally occupied” territories in Israel, including East Jerusalem and parts of the West Bank. This list was a dream victory for the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement because it lends credibility (in name only) to their actions against companies who are friendly with the Jewish state.
The @UN hit a new low today publishing its Antisemitic blacklist of companies it claims are involved in Israeli “settlement activity.” The timing of this after the U.S. released a peace plan is conniving & manipulative at best. Shameful. https://t.co/srJLZdZASf — Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) February 12, 2020
Both the United States and Israel withdrew from the United Nations Human Right Council two years ago as it was clear their goals revolved around harming Israel and Israel alone. Despite clear human rights violations in Iran, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Qatar, Nigeria, China, and dozens of nations that are more of a danger to their own people than Israel ever has been, the singular goal of the UNHRC is to delegitimize Israel’s very existence.
Anti-Semitism comes in many forms. For the political far-left, that means attacking Israel with everything possible on political and economic fronts so as not to be seen as anti-Semitic. They claim their attacks are not racially or religiously biased, but their actions tell a completely different story. The notion that Israel is more of a human rights violating nation than countries that commit human rights violations daily is ridiculous, but the Marxists must oppose Israel as much as they oppose conservatism in the United States. Both represent an existential threat to the Marxist ideology because both Israeli and American conservatism operate on a basis of truth. It’s like Kryptonite to the radical ideologies of people like Bachelet, Sanders, and France’s Emanuel Macron.
If you want to see how Bernie Sanders or other Marxists would act if given enough power, follow the actions of Michelle Bachelet. Her brand of socialism may be global in nature, but it’s a key example of what happens when collectivists have power.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-12--NH primary fallout: The race is now between overt and covert authoritarian socialists

It was just so promising in the beginning .
Leftists had just ‘ re-discovered ’ the ancient ideas of collectivism or at least pretended that was the case .
These supposedly wondrous concepts could do everything , from miraculously providing free health care , housing , and education to healing the oceans and lowering the planet ’ s temperature .
This was the shining promise of socialism , THE ideology of the 16th century that would solve all of our problems , bringing everyone together by dividing them into groups .
They make extraordinary promises or assert that one can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right ’ to their money and viola ; those with a little knowledge will flock to the party .
Klomentum : Rising in the polls by hiding who you are Senator Amy Klobuchar ( D-MN ) and billionaire Mike Bloomberg ( ?
NY ) are now rising in the polls because they avoid the ‘ s ’ and ‘ c ’ words – socialism and gun confiscation .
It was only a few days ago that Amy Klobuchar raised her hand to the question of having a ‘ democratic ’ socialist in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bloomberg wants every stepping stone to gun confiscation , he tiptoes on the line better than a Bolshoi ballerina .
Both are authoritarian at heart , like the rest of their comrades of the national socialist left .
But both hide it well .
At least well enough to look reasonable to some voters who remember the abject horrors of socialism or who would like to keep their basic human rights .
The majority of the people know the left has lost the plot Let ’ s face it , the 90 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know that the left ’ s socialist national agenda is far worse than being a non-starter , it would be an economic disaster of epic proportions .
Just beginning the talk of reaming the rich will send the stock market into a tailspin .
Recent polls show that most people know this to be true , outside the cadre of the totalitarian 10 % .
Most of the people are of a practical perspective and know in their hearts that there is no free lunch , that providing a wondrous benefit to some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gunpoint .
Many are too busy being productive and living their lives to pay attention to the authoritarians in our midst who preach revolutionary socialism .
There always has been the paradoxical situation that for most people , the more you know about socialism , the less you like it .
The wise words of Ronald Reagan said it best : The supreme irony being that it ’ s the folks from the authoritarian socialist left who project their lack of knowledge on others .
Only those with a superficial understanding of socialism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into it raises all kinds of questions that leftists can ’ t answer : • How do you counteract human nature ?
• What happens when the producers decide to stop producing ?
• How do you force people to produce when there is no incentive to do so ?
These bring forth all manner of contradictions that serve to dismantle the left ’ s base ideology .
Then of course it is the fact that numbers never add up .
The ever false Utopian promises of the left Leftists try to tiptoe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ largess can be paid for with platinum unicorn droppings .
Or that waving a magic wand will produce an infinite pot of gold at the end of the rainbow .
But those who live in the real world know that is nothing but bovine excreta of the highest order .
We are already $ 23 trillion ( with a ‘ T ’ ) in debt .
There is no more ‘ wealth ’ to be ‘ redistributed ’ .
We are going to have enough of a problem trying to turn around Titanic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If the cadre of overt and covert authoritarians takes the White House and Congress , there is no telling the carnage – beginning with a second civil war and ending with who knows .
The bottom line : Leftists are defined as socialists Whether or not they admit to the truth , those on the far-left are on the authoritarian side of the political spectrum .
That includes Klobuchar , Bloomberg and Buttigieg .
One only needs to look at their interpretation of the left ’ s socialist national agenda to confirm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we are going to see a close examination of the scourge of socialism , the modern version of slavery .
Coincidentally , in his discussion of the New Hampshire primary , Glenn Beck asked , are we seeing a sea change in America .
Are we seeing the beginning of the end of this ‘ woke Nazi-ish ’ ideology ?
Are we seeing the start of a pro-liberty push-back in America ?
His discussion was right in line with our contentions here .
The left can not withstand a close examination of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ withstand the fact that it means the death of liberty , democracy and progress .
That is why some of them have to hide who they are , but it won ’ t matter in the end .
They are on the wrong side of history .
We know it , they know it and soon enough , everyone else will know it .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
It was just so promising in the beginning. Leftists had just ‘re-discovered’ the ancient ideas of collectivism or at least pretended that was the case. These supposedly wondrous concepts could do everything, from miraculously providing free health care, housing, and education to healing the oceans and lowering the planet’s temperature.
This was the shining promise of socialism, THE ideology of the 16th century that would solve all of our problems, bringing everyone together by dividing them into groups. They make extraordinary promises or assert that one can enslave others because of a new ‘right’ to their money and viola; those with a little knowledge will flock to the party.
Klomentum: Rising in the polls by hiding who you are
Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and billionaire Mike Bloomberg ( ? NY) are now rising in the polls because they avoid the ‘s’ and ‘c’ words – socialism and gun confiscation. It was only a few days ago that Amy Klobuchar raised her hand to the question of having a ‘democratic’ socialist in the White House. Similarly, while Mike Bloomberg wants every stepping stone to gun confiscation, he tiptoes on the line better than a Bolshoi ballerina.
Both are authoritarian at heart, like the rest of their comrades of the national socialist left. But both hide it well. At least well enough to look reasonable to some voters who remember the abject horrors of socialism or who would like to keep their basic human rights.
The majority of the people know the left has lost the plot
Let’s face it, the 90% majority of the people in the country know that the left’s socialist national agenda is far worse than being a non-starter, it would be an economic disaster of epic proportions. Just beginning the talk of reaming the rich will send the stock market into a tailspin. Recent polls show that most people know this to be true, outside the cadre of the totalitarian 10%.
Most of the people are of a practical perspective and know in their hearts that there is no free lunch, that providing a wondrous benefit to some will entail forcibly taking from others at gunpoint. Many are too busy being productive and living their lives to pay attention to the authoritarians in our midst who preach revolutionary socialism.
There always has been the paradoxical situation that for most people, the more you know about socialism, the less you like it. The wise words of Ronald Reagan said it best:
“How do you tell a communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin.” Ronald Reagan
The supreme irony being that it’s the folks from the authoritarian socialist left who project their lack of knowledge on others. Only those with a superficial understanding of socialism believe it can actually work. Delving into it raises all kinds of questions that leftists can’t answer:
How do you counteract human nature?
What happens when the producers decide to stop producing?
How do you force people to produce when there is no incentive to do so?
These bring forth all manner of contradictions that serve to dismantle the left’s base ideology. Then of course it is the fact that numbers never add up.
The ever false Utopian promises of the left
Leftists try to tiptoe around the implication that all of this largess can be paid for with platinum unicorn droppings. Or that waving a magic wand will produce an infinite pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. But those who live in the real world know that is nothing but bovine excreta of the highest order.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
We are already $23 trillion (with a ‘T’) in debt. There is no more ‘wealth’ to be ‘redistributed’. We are going to have enough of a problem trying to turn around Titanic 2.0 even if President Trump is re-elected. If the cadre of overt and covert authoritarians takes the White House and Congress, there is no telling the carnage – beginning with a second civil war and ending with who knows.
The bottom line: Leftists are defined as socialists
Whether or not they admit to the truth, those on the far-left are on the authoritarian side of the political spectrum. That includes Klobuchar, Bloomberg and Buttigieg. One only needs to look at their interpretation of the left’s socialist national agenda to confirm this fact. One way or another, we are going to see a close examination of the scourge of socialism, the modern version of slavery.
Coincidentally, in his discussion of the New Hampshire primary, Glenn Beck asked, are we seeing a sea change in America. Are we seeing the beginning of the end of this ‘woke Nazi-ish’ ideology? Are we seeing the start of a pro-liberty push-back in America? His discussion was right in line with our contentions here.
The left cannot withstand a close examination of their base ideology. They cannot withstand the fact that it means the death of liberty, democracy and progress. That is why some of them have to hide who they are, but it won’t matter in the end. They are on the wrong side of history. We know it, they know it and soon enough, everyone else will know it.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-12--Diversity dysfunction: UVA’s new Multicultural Student Center has ‘too many white people’

It took four days of the University of Virginia ’ s new Multicultural Student Center being opened before diversity was officially flushed down the drain .
That ’ s when one student proudly declared there were “ too many white people in here ” and that the MSC was “ a space for people of color.
” The irony of the “ public service announcement ” is that the person delivering it has no idea that multiculturalism , by definition , is not supposed to exclude people based on , well , anything .
The intention of these cultural melting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people with diverse backgrounds to foster dialogue and strengthen relationships .
The fact that she felt empowered to obliterate the premise of the MSC and replace it with a statement that Caucasians were not welcome exemplifies the growing ignorance in America ’ s institutions of higher learning .
Bigotry in all of its forms has stained our nation ( and every nation that has ever existed ) throughout history .
But in recent years , old bigotries have been isolated and minimized for the most part .
That ’ s not to say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compared to just three decades ago , we are a much more culturally tolerant nation .
Unfortunately , the pendulum is now swinging in the other direction as unprotected groups—Caucasians , cisgenders , men , Christians , and especially those with combined classifications—are being marginalized for not being part of the intersectionality revolution .
The whole point of multiculturalism is for diversity that includes ALL cultures .
But the University of Virginia ’ s new MSC is apparently just for “ people of color.
” That ’ s not multiculturalism .
That ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ woke ” students cheered .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
It took four days of the University of Virginia’s new Multicultural Student Center being opened before diversity was officially flushed down the drain. That’s when one student proudly declared there were “too many white people in here” and that the MSC was “a space for people of color.”
Leftists at the University of Virginia are dictating who is and who isn’t allowed in the new Multicultural Student Center. “Frankly there is just too many white people in here, and this is a space for people of color.” This kind of racist intolerance is NOT multicultural. pic.twitter.com/XkefKqfqLA — YAF (@yaf) February 12, 2020
The irony of the “public service announcement” is that the person delivering it has no idea that multiculturalism, by definition, is not supposed to exclude people based on, well, anything. The intention of these cultural melting pots is for students to engage with people with diverse backgrounds to foster dialogue and strengthen relationships. The fact that she felt empowered to obliterate the premise of the MSC and replace it with a statement that Caucasians were not welcome exemplifies the growing ignorance in America’s institutions of higher learning.
This isn’t multiculturalism. It’s Cultural Marxism.
I’m pretty sure the way to fight imaginary “racism” isn’t with actual racism, just saying. pic.twitter.com/yzqZ35rfRO — Mindy Robinson ?? (@iheartmindy) February 12, 2020
Why did they name the “Minority Only Center” the “Multicultural Student Center” it’s completely misleading! https://t.co/Q3e9MpFt0O — Johnny (Joey) Jones (@Johnny_Joey) February 12, 2020
1950s: segregation is bad
2020: no segregation is good actually https://t.co/bt6UljZIwc — Jessica Fletcher (@heckyessica) February 12, 2020
Lol WTAF. And people take out LOANS to go here. https://t.co/fi2HyrC1aN — Erielle Davidson (@politicalelle) February 12, 2020
Segregation is back to being woke https://t.co/o8iOxkExbv — Greg Price (@greg_price11) February 12, 2020
Bigotry in all of its forms has stained our nation (and every nation that has ever existed) throughout history. But in recent years, old bigotries have been isolated and minimized for the most part. That’s not to say it doesn’t exist, but compared to just three decades ago, we are a much more culturally tolerant nation. Unfortunately, the pendulum is now swinging in the other direction as unprotected groups—Caucasians, cisgenders, men, Christians, and especially those with combined classifications—are being marginalized for not being part of the intersectionality revolution.
The whole point of multiculturalism is for diversity that includes ALL cultures. But the University of Virginia’s new MSC is apparently just for “people of color.” That’s not multiculturalism. That’s racism. And still the “woke” students cheered.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-12--61% say they’re better off now than three years ago, a record high: Gallup

WASHINGTON , D.C. — Sixty-one percent of Americans say they are better off than they were three years ago , a higher percentage than in prior election years when an incumbent president was running .
In the 1992 , 1996 and 2004 election cycles , exactly half said they were better off .
In three separate measures during the 2012 election cycle , an average of 45 % said they were better off .
The current results , from a Jan. 16-29 Gallup poll , echo record highs , measured earlier in January , in Americans ’ satisfaction with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ life and in their assessments of their personal finances .
Relatedly , 52 % of U.S. adults say it is easier for them to ‘ go and buy things in the stores ’ than it was three years ago , higher than in the 1992 , 1996 and 2004 election cycles , when the figures were closer to 40 % .
Americans ’ perceptions of whether they are personally better off , and whether it is easier to buy things , appear to be influenced much more by their party leanings than by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ separate Republicans ’ ( 89 % ) and Democrats ’ ( 29 % ) assessments of whether they are better off than three years ago .
Independents are essentially in the middle of the two groups , at 60 % .
Meanwhile , 64 % of those in both upper- and middle-income households say they are better off , as do 49 % of those in lower-income households .
The Republican-Democratic gap is smaller — 44 points — when people indicate whether it is easier for them to buy things than it was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republicans versus 32 % of Democrats say it is , as do 49 % of independents .
The party gaps on the ‘ better off than three years ago ’ question were much smaller in the past , partly because supporters of the incumbent president ’ s party were less upbeat about their situations than Republicans are today .
In addition to higher ratings among Republicans , today ’ s higher figures are also driven by more positive ratings among independents — 60 % today , compared with ratings near 50 % in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reagan famously asked the American people , “ Are you better off than you were four years ago ?
” When he asked this , America was in a terrible economic situation .
It was bold nonetheless because all but one of the major polls in October and November had Jimmy Carter ahead of Reagan .
Some say it was this self-reflective question asked less than a week before the election that put Reagan over the top .
President Trump is in a completely different situation .
He ’ s the incumbent and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ behoove him to ask this question time and time again until the election , as some advisers are certain to recommend .
If I had the President ’ s ear , I would tell him to hold the question until the end , perhaps the closing argument of the final debate , before dropping this potent seed in the minds of voters .
Republicans and Independents overwhelmingly realize their personal situations are better now than they were under President Obama .
Over a quarter of Democrats have to admit it as well .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ victory in November .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
61% say they are better off than three years ago
No more than 50% have said this in past election cycles
Evaluations of U.S. world standing mostly similar to past elections
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Sixty-one percent of Americans say they are better off than they were three years ago, a higher percentage than in prior election years when an incumbent president was running. In the 1992, 1996 and 2004 election cycles, exactly half said they were better off. In three separate measures during the 2012 election cycle, an average of 45% said they were better off.
The current results, from a Jan. 16-29 Gallup poll, echo record highs, measured earlier in January, in Americans’ satisfaction with the way things are going in their personal life and in their assessments of their personal finances.
Relatedly, 52% of U.S. adults say it is easier for them to ‘go and buy things in the stores’ than it was three years ago, higher than in the 1992, 1996 and 2004 election cycles, when the figures were closer to 40%.
Americans’ perceptions of whether they are personally better off, and whether it is easier to buy things, appear to be influenced much more by their party leanings than by their economic situations. Sixty percentage points separate Republicans’ (89%) and Democrats’ (29%) assessments of whether they are better off than three years ago. Independents are essentially in the middle of the two groups, at 60%. Meanwhile, 64% of those in both upper- and middle-income households say they are better off, as do 49% of those in lower-income households.
The Republican-Democratic gap is smaller — 44 points — when people indicate whether it is easier for them to buy things than it was three years ago: 76% of Republicans versus 32% of Democrats say it is, as do 49% of independents.
The party gaps on the ‘better off than three years ago’ question were much smaller in the past, partly because supporters of the incumbent president’s party were less upbeat about their situations than Republicans are today.
In addition to higher ratings among Republicans, today’s higher figures are also driven by more positive ratings among independents — 60% today, compared with ratings near 50% in prior years.
My Take
In 1980, President Reagan famously asked the American people, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?”
When he asked this, America was in a terrible economic situation. It was bold nonetheless because all but one of the major polls in October and November had Jimmy Carter ahead of Reagan. Some say it was this self-reflective question asked less than a week before the election that put Reagan over the top.
President Trump is in a completely different situation. He’s the incumbent and the economy is soaring. It might behoove him to ask this question time and time again until the election, as some advisers are certain to recommend. If I had the President’s ear, I would tell him to hold the question until the end, perhaps the closing argument of the final debate, before dropping this potent seed in the minds of voters.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
Republicans and Independents overwhelmingly realize their personal situations are better now than they were under President Obama. Over a quarter of Democrats have to admit it as well. President Trump should ride this fact to victory in November.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-12--Elizabeth Warren brags about taking half of a broke college student’s savings

Senator Elizabeth Warren desperately wants to be seen as the less radical version of Senator Bernie Sanders .
She wants to seem sensible enough to get moderate voters to trust her while extreme enough to get the “ woke ” crowd on her side .
Her favorite tactic to make that happen is to appeal to those who don ’ t have a lot of money and who blame billionaires for all of their troubles .
Unfortunately for her , Bernie has the breadline crowd in his corner and moderates still believe she ’ s going to take away their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pushing forward with her selfie campaign , bragging about all of the broke people who sent her their life savings like a televangelist who needs a new private jet .
Her latest gaffe ( which she oddly doesn ’ t realize is a gaffe ) came when she discussed how a broke college student gave $ 3 of their last $ 6 to the campaign .
Warren wants to be seen as a fighter , a realist , a capitalist , a progressive , a woman , a non-man , a minority , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seem relevant in the presidential conversation .
It hasn ’ t worked out for her so far after being the frontrunner just a few months ago .
Some candidates get caught on hot mics or called out for statements from the past and have to explain themselves to their voter base .
Elizabeth Warren broadcasts her own faux pas to the world willingly .
Conservatives on Twitter had fun with her bragging : It takes an unprecedented lack of self-awareness for a presidential candidate to say these words and think this will make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ On the demerits of this statement alone , Warren should end her campaign immediately .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
Senator Elizabeth Warren desperately wants to be seen as the less radical version of Senator Bernie Sanders. She wants to seem sensible enough to get moderate voters to trust her while extreme enough to get the “woke” crowd on her side. Her favorite tactic to make that happen is to appeal to those who don’t have a lot of money and who blame billionaires for all of their troubles. Unfortunately for her, Bernie has the breadline crowd in his corner and moderates still believe she’s going to take away their health insurance.
Nevertheless, she keeps pushing forward with her selfie campaign, bragging about all of the broke people who sent her their life savings like a televangelist who needs a new private jet. Her latest gaffe (which she oddly doesn’t realize is a gaffe) came when she discussed how a broke college student gave $3 of their last $6 to the campaign.
A young girl came up to me tonight and said, “I’m a broke college student with a lot of student loan debt. I checked and I have $6 in the bank—so I just gave $3 to keep you in this fight.” We’re staying in this fight for the people who are counting on us. pic.twitter.com/AetWhpTJqT — Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) February 12, 2020
Warren wants to be seen as a fighter, a realist, a capitalist, a progressive, a woman, a non-man, a minority, and anything else that can make her seem relevant in the presidential conversation. It hasn’t worked out for her so far after being the frontrunner just a few months ago.
Some candidates get caught on hot mics or called out for statements from the past and have to explain themselves to their voter base. Elizabeth Warren broadcasts her own faux pas to the world willingly. Conservatives on Twitter had fun with her bragging:
A good person would have told that girl to keep her money because it’s more important that she is able to take care of herself https://t.co/JCcMjIKEvy — Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) February 12, 2020
A conservative would have guided her to @DaveRamsey for financial advice, told her to keep that money and connect her with a job. Because #capitalism https://t.co/K1sAMhBrMT — Elisha (@ElishaKrauss) February 12, 2020
And you said, "I'll take that money and blow it on a dead campaign. Hey, maybe Bernie will waive your student debt." https://t.co/0c5q9sh0DH — Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) February 12, 2020
BREAKING: Millionaire takes half of poor woman’s life savings to run failed presidential campaign… https://t.co/TKrReJaASg — Dave Rubin (@RubinReport) February 12, 2020
I'll give you $3 if you pay me back for the college loans I paid off. https://t.co/A0AtW5Ieba — Marc Thiessen (@marcthiessen) February 12, 2020
When I walk down the street, homeless people give *me* money. https://t.co/IMvqIjF2eO — Siraj Hashmi ? (@SirajAHashmi) February 12, 2020
Lives in a $4M mansion; teaches at Harvard; knows she won’t be President; takes the last dollars from broke college student anyway. Warren in a nutshell. (Also woke people don’t call college students “girls” anymore okay? she’s a woman!) https://t.co/eSfY7GaBY2 — Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) February 12, 2020
Nothing screams socialism quite like millionaire Elizabeth Warren bragging that she took half of a broke woman's money to continue a failing campaign… https://t.co/2xFTWvXWsT — Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) February 12, 2020
As a millionaire whose campaign is failing, you should have hugged her and handed her $20 of your own money. https://t.co/gBqw4ZP7MN — Guy Benson (@guypbenson) February 12, 2020
You're a millionaire, why the hell are you taking $3 from someone who only has $6? What kind of monster are you? https://t.co/lkybBPIT5R — Derek Hunter (@derekahunter) February 12, 2020
That poor decision making may have something to do with why you have six dollars https://t.co/vLBhWTVoN6 — Bethany S. Mandel (@bethanyshondark) February 12, 2020
It takes an unprecedented lack of self-awareness for a presidential candidate to say these words and think this will make them more appealing to the masses. On the demerits of this statement alone, Warren should end her campaign immediately.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-12--After New Hampshire win, Bernie Sanders is actually in trouble

If there ’ s one thing that bugs me about primary season commentaries , it ’ s when a way-too-smart analyst makes the case for a win actually being a loss for a candidate , followed closely by analysts who make the case that a loss was actually a win .
The intellectual cartwheels necessary to be so nonsensical tarnishes the field of journalism and turns people away from listening to sound analyses .
With that said , I ’ ll make the case that Senator Bernie Sanders ’ win in the New Hampshire primary was not as rosy at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The difference between this analysis and others like it is that I ’ m right .
The others may be right as well , but I haven ’ t read them .
There were two scenarios that would have put Sanders clearly in the driver ’ s seat careening down the path to the nomination .
The first is obvious .
If he had won New Hampshire with anywhere near the support he had there in 2016 , the momentum would have likely pushed him to an outright win ( the Bloomberg wildcard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into the Democratic National Convention .
But he didn ’ t get that type of support .
In fact , he barely won in a state that loved him to the tune of 60 % of the votes in 2016 .
The field is obviously bigger this time and Hillary Clinton isn ’ t the one he ’ s fighting against , but to squeak out a win in New Hampshire doesn ’ t give him a big momentum boost .
The second scenario may seem counter-intuitive , but hear me out .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ delegates and finish in a comfortable but not encouraging third place .
Sanders is the benefactor of her fall from grace , but he needs her to not fall so fast .
He needs her to block other candidates from getting delegates because her delegates are much more likely to select him as their second choice in a contested convention than delegates for any of the other candidates .
In a brokered convention , Warren is Sanders ’ firewall .
She may be flip-flopping back and forth between being a radical progressive and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ delegates will be progressives .
With the new DNC rules awarding split delegates in all states , it ’ s imperative for someone like Sanders to have as many friendly faces in the delegate count as possible .
The only delegates who will favor him are his own , of course , and Warren ’ s .
If she fails miserably and continues getting goose eggs in the delegate count , his hopes of winning the nomination in Minneapolis are essentially nil if he can ’ t get to the magic number on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has already taken shape .
As a brokered convention seems more and more likely , it ’ s him versus the combined delegate counts of the rest of the field .
If he can ’ t win it outright , he has no chance of being the nominee .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
If there’s one thing that bugs me about primary season commentaries, it’s when a way-too-smart analyst makes the case for a win actually being a loss for a candidate, followed closely by analysts who make the case that a loss was actually a win. The intellectual cartwheels necessary to be so nonsensical tarnishes the field of journalism and turns people away from listening to sound analyses.
With that said, I’ll make the case that Senator Bernie Sanders’ win in the New Hampshire primary was not as rosy at it may seem on the surface. The difference between this analysis and others like it is that I’m right. The others may be right as well, but I haven’t read them.
There were two scenarios that would have put Sanders clearly in the driver’s seat careening down the path to the nomination. The first is obvious. If he had won New Hampshire with anywhere near the support he had there in 2016, the momentum would have likely pushed him to an outright win (the Bloomberg wildcard notwithstanding) with the necessary delegates going into the Democratic National Convention. But he didn’t get that type of support. In fact, he barely won in a state that loved him to the tune of 60% of the votes in 2016. The field is obviously bigger this time and Hillary Clinton isn’t the one he’s fighting against, but to squeak out a win in New Hampshire doesn’t give him a big momentum boost.
The second scenario may seem counter-intuitive, but hear me out. He needed Senator Elizabeth Warren to get delegates and finish in a comfortable but not encouraging third place. Sanders is the benefactor of her fall from grace, but he needs her to not fall so fast. He needs her to block other candidates from getting delegates because her delegates are much more likely to select him as their second choice in a contested convention than delegates for any of the other candidates.
In a brokered convention, Warren is Sanders’ firewall. She may be flip-flopping back and forth between being a radical progressive and being a sensible moderate, but her delegates will be progressives. With the new DNC rules awarding split delegates in all states, it’s imperative for someone like Sanders to have as many friendly faces in the delegate count as possible. The only delegates who will favor him are his own, of course, and Warren’s. If she fails miserably and continues getting goose eggs in the delegate count, his hopes of winning the nomination in Minneapolis are essentially nil if he can’t get to the magic number on his own.
The worst-case-scenario for Sanders has already taken shape. As a brokered convention seems more and more likely, it’s him versus the combined delegate counts of the rest of the field. If he can’t win it outright, he has no chance of being the nominee.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-12--Amy Klobuchar’s ‘big win’ in third place does not make her the comeback kid

There are three main storylines coming out of New Hampshire following the nation ’ s first primary vote .
The first and second are correct .
Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg are both looking good despite deficiencies that could haunt them in upcoming primaries .
Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden are looking terrible .
The third narrative is that Amy Klobuchar is now a player and may be the “ comeback kid , ” a reference to Bill Clinton ’ s New Hampshire second place finish after a terrible Iowa caucus .
That entry onto the national stage was the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nominee in 1992 .
But before everyone jumps on the Klobuchar bandwagon and believes she ’ s the next Clinton , there is an important point to remember .
Clinton charmed his way to the nomination .
All he needed was the national attention garnered from getting on the map in New Hampshire to get people looking at him .
What they saw , they liked .
Klobuchar is very different from Clinton .
She ’ s a candidate who , upon closer examination , is not charming .
She ’ s clever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sharp wit and is an excellent campaigner .
She even fits the “ moderate ” mold that many Democrats are seeking in order to prevent a radical progressive like Sanders from getting the nomination .
But she ’ s not likable .
In fact , she ’ s arguably the least likable candidate still in the running .
Even when the field was large , she was close to being as unlikable as Kamala Harris and Eric Swalwell , which is saying a lot .
Her history of berating her staff is well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the accusations .
She attributes it to her passion and demands of excellence , but that does not endear her to voters the way Clinton ’ s charm and slick talking did .
As it turned out , Clinton was technically much worse to acquaintances , having allegedly raped some of them .
But those concerns weren ’ t known to the general public when the Democratic primaries were roaring .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
There are three main storylines coming out of New Hampshire following the nation’s first primary vote. The first and second are correct. Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg are both looking good despite deficiencies that could haunt them in upcoming primaries. Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden are looking terrible.
The third narrative is that Amy Klobuchar is now a player and may be the “comeback kid,” a reference to Bill Clinton’s New Hampshire second place finish after a terrible Iowa caucus. That entry onto the national stage was the biggest reason Clinton ended up being the nominee in 1992.
But before everyone jumps on the Klobuchar bandwagon and believes she’s the next Clinton, there is an important point to remember. Clinton charmed his way to the nomination. All he needed was the national attention garnered from getting on the map in New Hampshire to get people looking at him. What they saw, they liked.
Klobuchar is very different from Clinton. She’s a candidate who, upon closer examination, is not charming. She’s clever at times. She definitely has a sharp wit and is an excellent campaigner. She even fits the “moderate” mold that many Democrats are seeking in order to prevent a radical progressive like Sanders from getting the nomination. But she’s not likable. In fact, she’s arguably the least likable candidate still in the running. Even when the field was large, she was close to being as unlikable as Kamala Harris and Eric Swalwell, which is saying a lot.
Her history of berating her staff is well documented, and she has nary denied the accusations. She attributes it to her passion and demands of excellence, but that does not endear her to voters the way Clinton’s charm and slick talking did. As it turned out, Clinton was technically much worse to acquaintances, having allegedly raped some of them. But those concerns weren’t known to the general public when the Democratic primaries were roaring.
As much as we’d love to see Klobuchar going head-to-head against President Trump, the more likely scenario is the more America gets to know her, the less they’ll like her. She’s less like Bill Clinton and more like his unlikable wife.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-12--Donald Trump Jr. trolls Kamala Harris over Jussie Smollett

When news broke that actor Jussie Smollett was indicted again for lying to Chicago Police about an alleged attack by Caucasian assailants , the memes wrote themselves .
Insults started flying .
Fans of justice were ecstatic .
Then , the trolling of historical Smollett supporters emerged .
The most epic came from Donald Trump Jr. as he went after Senator Kamala Harris .
Harris took some flack for calling the incident a “ modern day lynching ” even before it was known that it was all a hoax .
She even went so far as to push anti-lynching legislation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , already illegal .
Her attempts to virtue-signal the masses while in the midst of her campaign launch was bad enough , but the revelation that he alleged hired actors to pretend to beat him up made her situation much worse .
There are more reported hate hoaxes from Trump supporters than there are actual hate crimes committed by them .
This is indicative of a false narrative attempting to become a self-fulfilled prophecy , but people like Jussie Smollett just aren ’ t that clever .
Join fellow patriots as we form @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
When news broke that actor Jussie Smollett was indicted again for lying to Chicago Police about an alleged attack by Caucasian assailants, the memes wrote themselves. Insults started flying. Fans of justice were ecstatic. Then, the trolling of historical Smollett supporters emerged. The most epic came from Donald Trump Jr. as he went after Senator Kamala Harris.
Great news Kamala!!! It looks like they indicted the guy that did this to Juicy. #JusticeForJussie https://t.co/i2TK7YtUN9 — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) February 12, 2020
Harris took some flack for calling the incident a “modern day lynching” even before it was known that it was all a hoax. She even went so far as to push anti-lynching legislation even though it is, of course, already illegal. Her attempts to virtue-signal the masses while in the midst of her campaign launch was bad enough, but the revelation that he alleged hired actors to pretend to beat him up made her situation much worse.
There are more reported hate hoaxes from Trump supporters than there are actual hate crimes committed by them. This is indicative of a false narrative attempting to become a self-fulfilled prophecy, but people like Jussie Smollett just aren’t that clever.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-12--The question of abortion, sometimes reduced to yet another political issue, is personal for Michael

The question of abortion, sometimes reduced to yet another political issue, is personal for Michael Burgess

Thank you , Madam Chair .
Today ’ s hearing is an unfortunate indication of where the Democratic party is headed .
While the policy concerns surrounding abortion and a right to life are not new , a bill such as H.R .
2975 , with over 200 members of the Democratic party in support , is unprecedented .
This bill transcends pro-life and pro-choice .
The question of abortion , sometimes reduced to yet another political issue to debate , is personal for me .
My belief in the right to life has influenced my professional career for much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In fact , it ’ s been a lifetime .
Before being elected to represent the 26th District of Texas , I spent almost three decades practicing as an OB/GYN in North Texas .
My medical career was rooted in my pro-life practice and the belief that all life has meaningful potential .
In the span of my obstetrics career , I delivered more than 3,000 babies .
Not only did I have the joy of seeing these babies when they were delivered , but throughout my career I witnessed great advances in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to see these children developing in the womb .
For those of us who have watched a baby squirm and kick during a sonogram , there is no question about the sanctity of life .
While my work has changed through the years – I now spend late nights delivering policy rather than babies – my dedication to pro-life medicine remains steadfast .
Ironically , this bill is called the Women ’ s Health Protection Act of 2019 , even though , if this bill became law , it would put women ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The heavy-handed language used in this bill puts women at risk .
By codifying that there may be no restrictions or prohibitions on particular abortion procedure prior to viability , women may be placed at risk of a number of potential harms associated with certain abortion procedures such as infection , bleeding , or uterine perforation , without the ability to be regulated for safety purposes .
Not only does this bill raise questions about the Democrats ’ concern for women ’ s health and safety , it also raises questions about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Supreme Court established the viability test in Roe v. Wade in 1971 .
This standard says that once a baby reaches the point of ‘ viability , ’ a state may regulate or prohibit abortions .
In Roe v. Wade , Justice Blackmuns ’ opinion states that viability is usually placed at about seven months – or 28 weeks – but may occur earlier , even at 24 weeks .
In 1973 , a viable baby being born at 24 weeks was something to hope for in the future .
The youngest baby @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Last week , at the State of the Union , President Trump recognized a young girl and her mother in the crowd .
This young girl , Ellie Schneider , was born severely premature at 21 weeks .
Ellie is one of the youngest babies to survive in the US and she is now a happy and healthy two-year-old .
As an OB/GYN it is incredible to see the medical advances saving the lives of mothers and babies .
As the viability of a baby occurs earlier with the help of medical innovation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extends the rights of states to regulate earlier in a pregnancy term .
A bill like this seeks to override and dismiss the viability standard set by the Supreme Court in the wake of medical advances that are saving babies lives .
This bill would codify into law that access to an abortion is essential to women ’ s health .
This is contrary to the US Constitution , which is very clear when it guarantees a right to life .
The federal government should work to overcome the factors that lead to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that directly address these factors .
That is not this bill .
I am a physician , but most Members of Congress are not .
For me , this bill crosses a line into dictating the practice of medicine , which is uncomfortable and threatening to health care practitioners and hospitals across the country .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
As Prepared for Delivery
Thank you, Madam Chair. Today’s hearing is an unfortunate indication of where the Democratic party is headed. While the policy concerns surrounding abortion and a right to life are not new, a bill such as H.R. 2975, with over 200 members of the Democratic party in support, is unprecedented. This bill transcends pro-life and pro-choice.
The question of abortion, sometimes reduced to yet another political issue to debate, is personal for me. My belief in the right to life has influenced my professional career for much longer than my time in Congress. In fact, it’s been a lifetime. Before being elected to represent the 26th District of Texas, I spent almost three decades practicing as an OB/GYN in North Texas. My medical career was rooted in my pro-life practice and the belief that all life has meaningful potential.
In the span of my obstetrics career, I delivered more than 3,000 babies. Not only did I have the joy of seeing these babies when they were delivered, but throughout my career I witnessed great advances in the technology that allowed doctors and parents to see these children developing in the womb. For those of us who have watched a baby squirm and kick during a sonogram, there is no question about the sanctity of life.
While my work has changed through the years – I now spend late nights delivering policy rather than babies – my dedication to pro-life medicine remains steadfast.
Ironically, this bill is called the Women’s Health Protection Act of 2019, even though, if this bill became law, it would put women’s health and safety at risk. The heavy-handed language used in this bill puts women at risk.
By codifying that there may be no restrictions or prohibitions on particular abortion procedure prior to viability, women may be placed at risk of a number of potential harms associated with certain abortion procedures such as infection, bleeding, or uterine perforation, without the ability to be regulated for safety purposes.
Not only does this bill raise questions about the Democrats’ concern for women’s health and safety, it also raises questions about the regard for the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court established the viability test in Roe v. Wade in 1971. This standard says that once a baby reaches the point of ‘viability,’ a state may regulate or prohibit abortions.
In Roe v. Wade, Justice Blackmuns’ opinion states that viability is usually placed at about seven months – or 28 weeks – but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks. In 1973, a viable baby being born at 24 weeks was something to hope for in the future.
The youngest baby I delivered was at 23 weeks. Last week, at the State of the Union, President Trump recognized a young girl and her mother in the crowd. This young girl, Ellie Schneider, was born severely premature at 21 weeks. Ellie is one of the youngest babies to survive in the US and she is now a happy and healthy two-year-old. As an OB/GYN it is incredible to see the medical advances saving the lives of mothers and babies.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
As the viability of a baby occurs earlier with the help of medical innovation, the Roe v. Wade standard inherently extends the rights of states to regulate earlier in a pregnancy term. A bill like this seeks to override and dismiss the viability standard set by the Supreme Court in the wake of medical advances that are saving babies lives.
This bill would codify into law that access to an abortion is essential to women’s health. This is contrary to the US Constitution, which is very clear when it guarantees a right to life.
The federal government should work to overcome the factors that lead to abortions and should support well-crafted legislative proposals that directly address these factors. That is not this bill.
I am a physician, but most Members of Congress are not. For me, this bill crosses a line into dictating the practice of medicine, which is uncomfortable and threatening to health care practitioners and hospitals across the country.
I yield back.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-14--James Woods shames San Francisco twice with a picture and 15 words

“ Brevity is the soul of wit , ” Polonius quipped in Hamlet Act 2 , scene 2 .
It was a humorous line as he had just finished being anything but brief in the introduction to his report to the King , but the notion was correct .
The best examples of wit come from the fewest words possible , and actor James Woods exemplifies this trait perfectly .
Perhaps that ’ s why he does so well on Twitter with its 280-character limit .
Unlike most celebrity Twitter users with political leanings they express , Woods rarely if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it done one Tweet at a time .
The 280-character limit was no problem for him when he found an example of San Francisco ’ s much maligned handling of laws .
He was able to make statements about one ordinance and another city policy with a single image and 85-characters .
“ Where are the San Francisco police ?
Can ’ t they see the plastic straw on the sidewalk ?
” he asked .
The city ’ s policy is to essentially ignore anything that happens on the street that doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That includes open air drug use and defecating in public .
Seriously .
The ordinance he referred to was enacted in July of last year in which straws are illegal .
Again , seriously .
As backwards as San Francisco is , at least they ’ re consistent .
Laws that make no sense , such as a ban on straws , are strictly enforced .
Meanwhile , laws that should exist such as a ban on public defecation are bypassed .
It ’ s a leftist paradise .
Join fellow patriots as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
“Brevity is the soul of wit,” Polonius quipped in Hamlet Act 2, scene 2. It was a humorous line as he had just finished being anything but brief in the introduction to his report to the King, but the notion was correct. The best examples of wit come from the fewest words possible, and actor James Woods exemplifies this trait perfectly. Perhaps that’s why he does so well on Twitter with its 280-character limit. Unlike most celebrity Twitter users with political leanings they express, Woods rarely if ever creates Twitter threads. He gets it done one Tweet at a time.
The 280-character limit was no problem for him when he found an example of San Francisco’s much maligned handling of laws. He was able to make statements about one ordinance and another city policy with a single image and 85-characters.
Where are the San Francisco police? Can’t they see the plastic straw on the sidewalk? pic.twitter.com/SxIrlOto9X — James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) February 13, 2020
“Where are the San Francisco police? Can’t they see the plastic straw on the sidewalk?” he asked.
The city’s policy is to essentially ignore anything that happens on the street that doesn’t directly harm someone else. That includes open air drug use and defecating in public. Seriously. The ordinance he referred to was enacted in July of last year in which straws are illegal. Again, seriously.
As backwards as San Francisco is, at least they’re consistent. Laws that make no sense, such as a ban on straws, are strictly enforced. Meanwhile, laws that should exist such as a ban on public defecation are bypassed. It’s a leftist paradise.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-02-13--Scott Presler ranted in San Francisco today. It was absolutely epic.

While Greta Thunberg talks about cleaning the planet , Scott Presler is out there doing it .
While Nancy Pelosi asks the people of San Francisco to keep voting for her as they ’ ve done for decades , Scott Presler is making the streets of her home district cleaner .
And when Democrats rant in their echo chambers from the comfort of their homes , Scott Presler took his rant to the unfriendly streets of San Francisco to explain why he ’ s voting for President Donald J. Trump in November .
During one of his famous clean up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s filthiest cities , in this case San Francisco , the conservative activist was approached by a young woman who became very aggressive towards him .
Instead of backing down , as so many people would do in that situation , Presler took the time to tell her and everyone else who would listen that he is voting for President Trump .
More importantly , he explained why he was voting this way .
“ Why are illegal immigrants more important than Americans ?
” he asked to a gathering crowd .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ answer.
” Some people recorded the video , apparently in hopes that it would make for good leftist fodder on YouTube .
But Presler didn ’ t go silent .
In fact , he encouraged it to get posted and to go viral because his message is an important perspective to hear .
All-too-often we hear of reasons to despise the President as mainstream media has their propaganda machines set to max volume , 24-7 .
It ’ s refreshing to hear a perspective from a man literally on the streets , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the streets of progressive American cities .
“ My dad is a retired Navy Captain .
He served our country honorably , ” he continued .
“ My grandfather is a retired Navy Captain , and I ’ m doing my part to help our country because I give a damn , and I ’ m going to fight for it , and I am 100 % voting for Donald Trump on Tuesday , November 3 , 2020.
” Scott Presler takes action .
He ’ s an inspiration to those whose streets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s an inspiration to those who want to support President Trump but are fearful of unhinged , violent leftists .
This is why today ’ s rant is so important .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
While Greta Thunberg talks about cleaning the planet, Scott Presler is out there doing it. While Nancy Pelosi asks the people of San Francisco to keep voting for her as they’ve done for decades, Scott Presler is making the streets of her home district cleaner. And when Democrats rant in their echo chambers from the comfort of their homes, Scott Presler took his rant to the unfriendly streets of San Francisco to explain why he’s voting for President Donald J. Trump in November.
During one of his famous clean up sessions on the streets of America’s filthiest cities, in this case San Francisco, the conservative activist was approached by a young woman who became very aggressive towards him. Instead of backing down, as so many people would do in that situation, Presler took the time to tell her and everyone else who would listen that he is voting for President Trump. More importantly, he explained why he was voting this way.
I was cleaning up the streets of San Francisco & this young woman became very aggressive. I don’t know what came over me, but I proclaimed my support for @realDonaldTrump on the dirty streets of SF & people listened. I hope this goes viral. pic.twitter.com/ZfIHg1d5SH — #ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) February 13, 2020
“Why are illegal immigrants more important than Americans?” he asked to a gathering crowd. “I’d like to hear an answer.”
Some people recorded the video, apparently in hopes that it would make for good leftist fodder on YouTube. But Presler didn’t go silent. In fact, he encouraged it to get posted and to go viral because his message is an important perspective to hear. All-too-often we hear of reasons to despise the President as mainstream media has their propaganda machines set to max volume, 24-7. It’s refreshing to hear a perspective from a man literally on the streets, a man who knows more than most about the streets of progressive American cities.
“My dad is a retired Navy Captain. He served our country honorably,” he continued. “My grandfather is a retired Navy Captain, and I’m doing my part to help our country because I give a damn, and I’m going to fight for it, and I am 100% voting for Donald Trump on Tuesday, November 3, 2020.”
Scott Presler takes action. He’s an inspiration to those whose streets he helps make cleaner. He’s an inspiration to those who want to support President Trump but are fearful of unhinged, violent leftists. This is why today’s rant is so important.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]