noqreport--2020-03-05--The right ways to hit Biden

The right ways to hit Biden

The Democratic nomination process isn ’ t over , but the tea leaves tell us unless there ’ s a major change to the calculus , Joe Biden will emerge victorious at a contested convention or maybe even outright .
Many conservatives were ramping up for the singular focus of hitting Bernie Sanders on the authoritarianism inherent in his Democratic Socialism ( aka Socialism ) .
Now , we ’ re having to rethink the attack angles as Biden may have plenty of authoritarian leanings , but he ’ s not really a socialist .
The problem is there are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him , it ’ s hard to find the right path .
I listed some of them on Twitter : Considering the majority of conservatives who are active in politics use social media , blogs , or word of mouth as their avenues through which to share their concerns about a candidate , it ’ s important that we focus on the points that can actually resonate and influence the election in favor of President Trump .
It ’ s easy to just hit , hit , hit , as Biden is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infamous gaffes , but we must employ some strategy if we want to maximize effectiveness .
Let ’ s start by addressing our targets .
I ’ m going to assume that most reading this do not have access to ad budgets ( though PACs and campaigns should take note as well ) , so we ’ ll proceed from a social media and/or word of mouth perspective .
Knowing this , one thing is crystal clear : Those who suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome , whether they ’ re leftists or NeverTrump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ swayed .
Biden could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and these people still won ’ t vote for President Trump .
But that doesn ’ t mean we avoid inserting tidbits of attacks on Biden into their post comments or real-life conversations .
There are others watching these things unfold , so leaving an appropriately brutal hit on Biden as a comment on a James Comey Tweet isn ’ t a bad idea .
You ’ re not going to influence Comey , but you may influence someone reading Comey ’ s thread @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the attack angles that are ineffective .
Arguably the easiest way to hit Biden is for his gaffes .
This is a bad idea , generally .
Everyone knows he makes gaffes .
Flooding Twitter with more of them isn ’ t going to surprise nor sway anyone with one exception : The major , character-revealing gaffes .
It does not behoove us to keep playing him saying “ Super Thursday… Tuesday… I ’ m getting ahead of myself.
” That was a minor gaffe in which he misspoke and quickly corrected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ towards his declining mental acuity , but there are much better examples of this .
Don ’ t waste time on the small stuff .
An example of a major gaffe is old , but it ’ s revealing and likely unknown to a good number of people : Some may say this was no big deal , that he was just stating an awkward opinion that wasn ’ t politically correct .
This is true .
But it ’ s an insight into his character that—thanks in large part to society ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , especially Indian-Americans .
Nevertheless , highlighting his numerous gaffes is generally a weak path to follow .
There are so many bigger fish to fry with Biden .
Another angle that seems , on the surface , to be a good way to attack Biden is to highlight how his family has benefited from his five decades in DC .
It ’ s true , there is plenty of evidence that everyone from his brother to his son have been recipients of the Biden-name-boost .
Unfortunately , most Americans don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ common practice in DC because , well , it is .
Others think they ’ d do the same if they were in office .
Some would point to familial benefits of being a Trump , including Ivanka and Jared Kushner being in the White House currently .
The few who would be offended aren ’ t worth focusing attention on , therefore this attack route is weak as well .
Before I get to the two great ways to hit Biden , I ’ ll point to the one that ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Biden likes sniffing hair .
It ’ s weird and even debatable , but the evidence seems to point in that direction .
He also seems to have a thing for touching or otherwise invading the personal space of women .
At first glance , this seems like a good angle .
I ’ m not sure one way or the other ; the sheer fact that it didn ’ t seem to hurt him in the polls when it started spreading like wildfire a little over a year ago makes me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but how could it be ?
On that particular hit route , you be the judge .
Now , let ’ s look at two angles we all should definitely be hitting .
On Hannity last light , President Trump noted that Biden ’ s connections to Ukraine corruption through Burisma and his son , Hunter , are going to be highlighted by his campaign .
This is a good strategy .
Those of us who are involved in politics may find it hard to believe there are still tens of millions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s quid pro quo .
We live in a political bubble and sometimes forget there are plenty of people who didn ’ t follow impeachment , never heard of Burisma , and are unaware of how corrupt Biden really is .
We need this message to resonate , even if we think it ’ s old news .
Arguably the best attack angle on Biden is one that must be handled carefully .
It ’ s becoming more and more evident that he ’ s lost a mental step or two .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be senile .
It ’ s terrifying , at least it should be , but there ’ s an important caveat to note about this weakness to exploit against Biden .
We can ’ t just hammer the fact that his mental acuity is fading .
That in and of itself is not necessarily a gamechanger in the minds of many voters .
The important part we need to highlight is that the country will be run by unelected , power-hungry bureaucrats hand-picked by other unelected , power-hungry bureaucrats to initiate an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A senile president who is a figurehead for the Deep State and the Swamp is the real threat to America ’ s future .
Electing Joe Biden means handing control of the nation to the people responsible for the economic collapse .
These are the people who put us in Iraq and Afghanistan .
These are the bureaucratic and corporate elite who will take this nation down a path of authoritarian control .
They believe they can placate the masses through manufactured outrage and crisis-driven folly .
They look down on us all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , President Reagan , and President Trump even dared to countermand their self-appointed authority .
Saying Joe Biden is senile is just the opening to the argument against him .
We must explain to people what that means and who will actually be in charge .
It won ’ t be Jill Biden or whoever the VP is .
It will be the Swamp , the Deep State , and the technocrats .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
The Democratic nomination process isn’t over, but the tea leaves tell us unless there’s a major change to the calculus, Joe Biden will emerge victorious at a contested convention or maybe even outright. Many conservatives were ramping up for the singular focus of hitting Bernie Sanders on the authoritarianism inherent in his Democratic Socialism (aka Socialism). Now, we’re having to rethink the attack angles as Biden may have plenty of authoritarian leanings, but he’s not really a socialist.
The problem is there are so many angles from which to attack him, it’s hard to find the right path. I listed some of them on Twitter:
Joe Biden: ☑ Five decades in DC
☑ Evident corruption
☑ Deep State favorite
☑ Family favors abound
☑ Epitomizes the Swamp
☑ Clearly senile
☑ Won't stop sniffing hair If he's to be the Democrats' treatment for their flaring #TDS, then bring it on. Patriots are ready. — Michio Hasai (@hasai) March 5, 2020
Considering the majority of conservatives who are active in politics use social media, blogs, or word of mouth as their avenues through which to share their concerns about a candidate, it’s important that we focus on the points that can actually resonate and influence the election in favor of President Trump. It’s easy to just hit, hit, hit, as Biden is a walking punching bag with all of his infamous gaffes, but we must employ some strategy if we want to maximize effectiveness.
Let’s start by addressing our targets. I’m going to assume that most reading this do not have access to ad budgets (though PACs and campaigns should take note as well), so we’ll proceed from a social media and/or word of mouth perspective. Knowing this, one thing is crystal clear: Those who suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome, whether they’re leftists or NeverTrump conservatives, will almost certainly never be swayed. Biden could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and these people still won’t vote for President Trump. But that doesn’t mean we avoid inserting tidbits of attacks on Biden into their post comments or real-life conversations. There are others watching these things unfold, so leaving an appropriately brutal hit on Biden as a comment on a James Comey Tweet isn’t a bad idea. You’re not going to influence Comey, but you may influence someone reading Comey’s thread.
Next, let’s look at the attack angles that are ineffective. Arguably the easiest way to hit Biden is for his gaffes. This is a bad idea, generally. Everyone knows he makes gaffes. Flooding Twitter with more of them isn’t going to surprise nor sway anyone with one exception: The major, character-revealing gaffes. It does not behoove us to keep playing him saying “Super Thursday… Tuesday… I’m getting ahead of myself.” That was a minor gaffe in which he misspoke and quickly corrected himself. Some would say it plays towards his declining mental acuity, but there are much better examples of this. Don’t waste time on the small stuff.
An example of a major gaffe is old, but it’s revealing and likely unknown to a good number of people:
Some may say this was no big deal, that he was just stating an awkward opinion that wasn’t politically correct. This is true. But it’s an insight into his character that—thanks in large part to society’s newfound hyper-sensitivity to stereotypes—will offend people, especially Indian-Americans.
Nevertheless, highlighting his numerous gaffes is generally a weak path to follow. There are so many bigger fish to fry with Biden.
Another angle that seems, on the surface, to be a good way to attack Biden is to highlight how his family has benefited from his five decades in DC. It’s true, there is plenty of evidence that everyone from his brother to his son have been recipients of the Biden-name-boost. Unfortunately, most Americans don’t care. Some assume it’s common practice in DC because, well, it is. Others think they’d do the same if they were in office. Some would point to familial benefits of being a Trump, including Ivanka and Jared Kushner being in the White House currently. The few who would be offended aren’t worth focusing attention on, therefore this attack route is weak as well.
Before I get to the two great ways to hit Biden, I’ll point to the one that’s up in the air in my mind. Biden likes sniffing hair. It’s weird and even debatable, but the evidence seems to point in that direction. He also seems to have a thing for touching or otherwise invading the personal space of women. At first glance, this seems like a good angle. I’m not sure one way or the other; the sheer fact that it didn’t seem to hurt him in the polls when it started spreading like wildfire a little over a year ago makes me believe it’s a non-issue, but how could it be? On that particular hit route, you be the judge.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
Now, let’s look at two angles we all should definitely be hitting.
On Hannity last light, President Trump noted that Biden’s connections to Ukraine corruption through Burisma and his son, Hunter, are going to be highlighted by his campaign. This is a good strategy. Those of us who are involved in politics may find it hard to believe there are still tens of millions of voters who have never heard about Biden’s quid pro quo. We live in a political bubble and sometimes forget there are plenty of people who didn’t follow impeachment, never heard of Burisma, and are unaware of how corrupt Biden really is. We need this message to resonate, even if we think it’s old news.
Arguably the best attack angle on Biden is one that must be handled carefully. It’s becoming more and more evident that he’s lost a mental step or two. To put it bluntly, he appears to be senile. It’s terrifying, at least it should be, but there’s an important caveat to note about this weakness to exploit against Biden. We can’t just hammer the fact that his mental acuity is fading. That in and of itself is not necessarily a gamechanger in the minds of many voters. The important part we need to highlight is that the country will be run by unelected, power-hungry bureaucrats hand-picked by other unelected, power-hungry bureaucrats to initiate an agenda that Americans will not like.
A senile president who is a figurehead for the Deep State and the Swamp is the real threat to America’s future. Electing Joe Biden means handing control of the nation to the people responsible for the economic collapse. These are the people who put us in Iraq and Afghanistan. These are the bureaucratic and corporate elite who will take this nation down a path of authoritarian control. They believe they can placate the masses through manufactured outrage and crisis-driven folly. They look down on us all, and only leaders like President Kennedy, President Reagan, and President Trump even dared to countermand their self-appointed authority.
Saying Joe Biden is senile is just the opening to the argument against him. We must explain to people what that means and who will actually be in charge. It won’t be Jill Biden or whoever the VP is. It will be the Swamp, the Deep State, and the technocrats.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-06--A WaPo columnist, NYT editorial board member, and MSNBC host walk into a math class…

It doesn ’ t take a genius to do basic arithmetic .
We have calculators on our phones if the numbers are too big .
Unfortunately , we have progressive journalists on our phones bleating at us as well , and that may be the key to understanding why so many Americans embrace modern Democratic financial policies .
The math is fuzzy and mainstream media isn ’ t helping .
Case-in-point : MSNBC host Brian Williams talking to NY Times editorial board member Mara Gay about a Tweet by Washington Post columnist Mekita Rivas .
The Tweet , which lambasted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a presidential campaign when he could have helped every American to their share of the riches , had some mathematical challenges .
According to the now-deleted Tweet : “ Bloomberg spent $ 500 million on ads .
The U.S. population is 327 million .
He could have given each American $ 1 million and still have money left over .
I feel like a $ 1 million check would be life-changing for most people .
Yet he wasted it all on ads and STILL LOST.
” As anyone with a calculator or recollections @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you , Rivas was off .
Twitter users were quick to point out her error , so she deleted the post .
That should have been the end of it , but instead she decided to double-down on her error by making another .
Keep in mind , this isn ’ t a random person making a mental error .
This is a blue-checkmark , nationally published journalist whose opinions hold sway over the radical progressive masses .
It ’ s no wonder they seem to think Joe Biden ’ s outrageously expensive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enough or that Bernie Sanders is right that billionaires can pay for everything , leaving the rest of us soaking up million-dollar checks every month .
Unfortunately , the math was shared by MSNBC , but instead of debunking it , they allowed the NY Times editorial board member to push the “ leftist math ” further out to the unhinged folks who still watch the news channel .
To Williams ’ credit , he may have recognized the error .
To his shame , his only caveat was to say , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re ahead of us on the math.
” One can also argue that he justified the math by saying , “ When I read it tonight on social media , it kind of all became clear.
” Did he misunderstand the math like the other two progressive journalists or did he understand it and willfully mislead his viewers ?
Either way , he ’ s complicit in the dumbing down of the American left .
As I ’ ve said before , one of the reasons modern Democratic policies are so popular @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ability to comprehend large sums of money at a certain point .
A million is a billion , a billion is a trillion… what difference does it really make to someone making $ 12 an hour ?
To those who don ’ t even try to wrap their heads around the differences , here ’ s a quick breakdown with healthcare as the basis .
Biden ’ s “ modest ” healthcare plan would cost every American taxpayer an additional $ 5323 .
That ’ s on top of what we ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he specifically kept the total number under a trillion dollars to keep his distance from Sanders ’ healthcare plan .
Why ?
Because it makes him seem more moderate .
The world of politics isn ’ t about dealing with real numbers .
It ’ s about dealing with numbers the people can grasp , which is why you ’ d never hear Biden say how much it would cost every individual taxpayer .
We , as a nation , may have a hard time dealing with millions , billions , and trillions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ additional $ 5k isn ’ t what we want .
When mainstream media—specifically MSNBC , Washington Post , and NY Times—is working together to mislead Americans into thinking billionaires can solve all of our problems , it ’ s no wonder leftist policies are popular to some .
Math is too hard for them .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
It doesn’t take a genius to do basic arithmetic. We have calculators on our phones if the numbers are too big. Unfortunately, we have progressive journalists on our phones bleating at us as well, and that may be the key to understanding why so many Americans embrace modern Democratic financial policies. The math is fuzzy and mainstream media isn’t helping.
Case-in-point: MSNBC host Brian Williams talking to NY Times editorial board member Mara Gay about a Tweet by Washington Post columnist Mekita Rivas. The Tweet, which lambasted billionaire Mike Bloomberg for wasting money on a presidential campaign when he could have helped every American to their share of the riches, had some mathematical challenges.
MSNBC 11th Hour just showed this tweet from @MekitaRivas on national television. I'm speechless. pic.twitter.com/eMLhhFDcFR — PG Howie (@PGHowie2) March 6, 2020
According to the now-deleted Tweet: “Bloomberg spent $500 million on ads. The U.S. population is 327 million. He could have given each American $1 million and still have money left over. I feel like a $1 million check would be life-changing for most people. Yet he wasted it all on ads and STILL LOST.”
As anyone with a calculator or recollections of 3rd grade math class will tell you, Rivas was off. Twitter users were quick to point out her error, so she deleted the post. That should have been the end of it, but instead she decided to double-down on her error by making another.
Oh my gosh. Please keep tweeting about this. If only there were a calculator app on your phone. pic.twitter.com/qEZntlhQyA — BarnRant (@BarnRant) March 4, 2020
Keep in mind, this isn’t a random person making a mental error. This is a blue-checkmark, nationally published journalist whose opinions hold sway over the radical progressive masses. It’s no wonder they seem to think Joe Biden’s outrageously expensive proposed policies don’t go far enough or that Bernie Sanders is right that billionaires can pay for everything, leaving the rest of us soaking up million-dollar checks every month. Unfortunately, the math was shared by MSNBC, but instead of debunking it, they allowed the NY Times editorial board member to push the “leftist math” further out to the unhinged folks who still watch the news channel.
MSNBC’s Brian Williams reads a tweet: "Bloomberg spent $500 million on ads. U.S. Population, 327 million. He could have given each American $1 million" NYT Editorial Board Member Mara Gay: “It’s an incredible way of putting it. It’s true. It’s disturbing” It's $1.53 per person pic.twitter.com/dIiwCESgh8 — Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) March 6, 2020
To Williams’ credit, he may have recognized the error. To his shame, his only caveat was to say, “don’t tell us if you’re ahead of us on the math.” One can also argue that he justified the math by saying, “When I read it tonight on social media, it kind of all became clear.” Did he misunderstand the math like the other two progressive journalists or did he understand it and willfully mislead his viewers? Either way, he’s complicit in the dumbing down of the American left.
As I’ve said before, one of the reasons modern Democratic policies are so popular is because too many Americans lose the ability to comprehend large sums of money at a certain point. A million is a billion, a billion is a trillion… what difference does it really make to someone making $12 an hour? To those who don’t even try to wrap their heads around the differences, here’s a quick breakdown with healthcare as the basis.
Biden’s “modest” healthcare plan would cost every American taxpayer an additional $5323. That’s on top of what we’re spending on healthcare right now. But he specifically kept the total number under a trillion dollars to keep his distance from Sanders’ healthcare plan. Why? Because it makes him seem more moderate.
The world of politics isn’t about dealing with real numbers. It’s about dealing with numbers the people can grasp, which is why you’d never hear Biden say how much it would cost every individual taxpayer. We, as a nation, may have a hard time dealing with millions, billions, and trillions, but everyone understands that paying an additional $5k isn’t what we want.
When mainstream media—specifically MSNBC, Washington Post, and NY Times—is working together to mislead Americans into thinking billionaires can solve all of our problems, it’s no wonder leftist policies are popular to some. Math is too hard for them.
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-06--With Senate majority at risk, Republicans must start rallying now

Much attention has been paid to the House of Representatives as primaries on Tuesday in California demonstrated real weakness for Democrats , opening the door to the possibility of the GOP taking back the majority and removing the gavel from Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi next January .
Having control of the House , Senate , and White House would give the GOP agenda a huge boost for at least two of President Trump ’ s final four years .
The House looks promising and the White House looks pretty secure as Democrats squabble over socialism versus senility .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ as Democrats try to flip the four seats necessary to take back the majority they lost in 2014 .
What are their chances of doing that ?
Currently , 18 of the 35 seats up for grabs in November are safe .
It would take something catastrophic for Tom Cotton to lose in Arkansas or Dick Durbin to lose in Illinois .
That leaves 17 that have the possibility of being flipped , and most of them are Republicans .
The good news is one of those that is almost certain to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He squeaked by the special election due to reports that his Republican opponent , Judge Roy Moore , dated teen girls when he was in his 30s .
He denied the reports , but voters were spooked enough to put a Democrat in the seat vacated by former Attorney General Jeff Sessions .
Now Sessions and Tommy Tuberville are vying for the opportunity to take on Jones in the general election .
Either one of them should beat Jones by double digits .
With the Senate currently sitting at 53-47 , flipping Alabama @ @ @ @ @ @ @ four elections to get a tie .
Assuming Vice President Mike Pence is still the tiebreaker in 2021 , Democrats would need a fifth win to get an actual majority and install Chuck Schumer as Senate Majority Leader , thus demolishing the President ’ s judicial agenda of plugging in right-leaning judges .
This is why Schumer made his unhinged rant this week to set the stage for an election battle with Roe v. Wade unofficially on the ballot .
There are currently four Republicans who are in real danger of losing their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in easy races .
Martha McSally of Arizona , Cory Gardner of Colorado , Thom Tillis of North Carolina , and Susan Collins of Maine are all behind the eight ball .
Though most analysts are calling their races toss-ups , I would have a much more grim perspective .
These seats are likely to be flipped if a concerted effort and a lot of money isn ’ t injected into those races between now and November .
Gardner in particular is in trouble as Colorado has gone from purple to very much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and incumbency status may not be enough to overcome the state ’ s blue wave that saw Bernie Sanders defeat “ moderate ” Joe Biden on Tuesday .
Collins isn ’ t loved in her light blue state , either .
Maine has been bucking the GOP a lot lately , and while she was once the popular Republican there with her pro-choice abortion stance , her support of Brett Kavanaugh ’ s conformation did not endear her to many of the Independents who supported her .
But she has the money advantage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ long time .
There ’ s still a chance she can pull this out .
McSally is simply weak .
She lost to Kyrsten Sinema in 2018 , then was appointed to the other Senate seat after John McCain died .
But Arizona is still mostly red , leaning towards purple but not quite there yet .
Of the four races , hers is the one that the GOP needs to win the most .
Losing in Arizona would be a major blow to keeping the state right-leaning , opening the door to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the perceived Republican weakness .
Gary Peters in Michigan is the only other Democrat with a realistic chance of being flipped .
If the GOP loses all four vulnerable seats , they may need Peters ’ seat to keep things moving along properly .
A slim majority of 51 would hamper the GOP agenda greatly .
With people like Mitt Romney and Lisa Murkowski siding with Democrats regularly , it ’ s important for Republicans to not rely on a sliver .
We need strong majority in order to keep the judiciary leaning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agenda to move full-speed ahead if Republicans can retake control of the House .
So much attention is put on presidential elections , but a win by President Trump is greatly hampered if his party can not keep control of the Senate .
This is not the time for complacency or laziness .
Republicans must rally to keep the Senate red .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Much attention has been paid to the House of Representatives as primaries on Tuesday in California demonstrated real weakness for Democrats, opening the door to the possibility of the GOP taking back the majority and removing the gavel from Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi next January. Having control of the House, Senate, and White House would give the GOP agenda a huge boost for at least two of President Trump’s final four years.
The House looks promising and the White House looks pretty secure as Democrats squabble over socialism versus senility. But the Senate is also in play as Democrats try to flip the four seats necessary to take back the majority they lost in 2014. What are their chances of doing that?
Currently, 18 of the 35 seats up for grabs in November are safe. It would take something catastrophic for Tom Cotton to lose in Arkansas or Dick Durbin to lose in Illinois. That leaves 17 that have the possibility of being flipped, and most of them are Republicans. The good news is one of those that is almost certain to be flipped is Doug Jones in Alabama. He squeaked by the special election due to reports that his Republican opponent, Judge Roy Moore, dated teen girls when he was in his 30s. He denied the reports, but voters were spooked enough to put a Democrat in the seat vacated by former Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Now Sessions and Tommy Tuberville are vying for the opportunity to take on Jones in the general election. Either one of them should beat Jones by double digits.
With the Senate currently sitting at 53-47, flipping Alabama means the Democrats would need to win four elections to get a tie. Assuming Vice President Mike Pence is still the tiebreaker in 2021, Democrats would need a fifth win to get an actual majority and install Chuck Schumer as Senate Majority Leader, thus demolishing the President’s judicial agenda of plugging in right-leaning judges. This is why Schumer made his unhinged rant this week to set the stage for an election battle with Roe v. Wade unofficially on the ballot.
There are currently four Republicans who are in real danger of losing their seats with several others who are not in easy races. Martha McSally of Arizona, Cory Gardner of Colorado, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, and Susan Collins of Maine are all behind the eight ball. Though most analysts are calling their races toss-ups, I would have a much more grim perspective. These seats are likely to be flipped if a concerted effort and a lot of money isn’t injected into those races between now and November. Gardner in particular is in trouble as Colorado has gone from purple to very much blue in recent years. Name recognition and incumbency status may not be enough to overcome the state’s blue wave that saw Bernie Sanders defeat “moderate” Joe Biden on Tuesday.
Collins isn’t loved in her light blue state, either. Maine has been bucking the GOP a lot lately, and while she was once the popular Republican there with her pro-choice abortion stance, her support of Brett Kavanaugh’s conformation did not endear her to many of the Independents who supported her. But she has the money advantage and she’s been there a long time. There’s still a chance she can pull this out.
McSally is simply weak. She lost to Kyrsten Sinema in 2018, then was appointed to the other Senate seat after John McCain died. But Arizona is still mostly red, leaning towards purple but not quite there yet. Of the four races, hers is the one that the GOP needs to win the most. Losing in Arizona would be a major blow to keeping the state right-leaning, opening the door to future candidates in other races because of the perceived Republican weakness.
Gary Peters in Michigan is the only other Democrat with a realistic chance of being flipped. If the GOP loses all four vulnerable seats, they may need Peters’ seat to keep things moving along properly. A slim majority of 51 would hamper the GOP agenda greatly. With people like Mitt Romney and Lisa Murkowski siding with Democrats regularly, it’s important for Republicans to not rely on a sliver. We need strong majority in order to keep the judiciary leaning towards the Constitution and for the Trump agenda to move full-speed ahead if Republicans can retake control of the House.
So much attention is put on presidential elections, but a win by President Trump is greatly hampered if his party cannot keep control of the Senate. This is not the time for complacency or laziness. Republicans must rally to keep the Senate red.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.


noqreport--2020-03-06--Senator Schumer needs to be ‘red flagged’ and removed from office or justice is no longer blind

If an ordinary citizen had issued the threat that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer made recently in a state with vile ‘ Red Flag ’ gun confiscation swatting laws , they could easily experience having their door battered down at 3:00 AM in a no-knock raid to forcibly confiscate their guns , regardless if they own any or not .
To borrow the words so often used in touting these laws , a ‘ Red Flag ’ petition under one of these due process abominations would temporarily remove him from office since he poses a threat to others or himself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go before a court to prove he is not a threat and have himself restored to office .
His name would of course be added to the instant background check system and he would be flagged whenever he runs for re-election .
Thus would be the fate of any ordinary citizen who ran afoul of just about anyone who wanted revenge .
They would not be given the benefit of the doubt or allowed to explain away what they supposedly had done , if even they hadn ’ t done anything at all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will tear the nation apart In the case of the Minority Leader , his words were on video for all to hear , with every inflection and nuance to prove the point .
However , he won ’ t be removed from office in this manner because there are those who prioritize power over everything else , including individual human rights set down in our founding documents .
These are the people of the authoritarian left , which ironically includes Senator Schumer himself .
For them it is far more important that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Never mind that laws already exist to handle people ‘ in crisis ’ as they say .
To them , the non-crisis was so dire that new laws that sweep away whole swaths of the Constitution were desperately needed without delay .
Back during the days of Apartheid in South Africa , the nation ’ s socialist left abhorred a legal code that treated some people differently than others .
However , these days that kind of injustice is perfectly acceptable to them , as long as it disarms their political enemies .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the very idea of due process and the rest of the bill of rights on its head .
The bottom line : If ordinary citizens can be Red Flagged , why not Senator Schumer ?
Of course , the obligatory due process retort from the left highlights their egregious hypocrisy .
The case of the Bernie Sanders supporter who tried to kill Republican lawmakers shows that some people act on threats made by politicians .
Thus , we see that there is a very good reason the founders mandated due process and equality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ endorsed by conservatives and true liberals .
If it ’ s wrong to remove Senator Schumer from office under a ‘ Red Flag ’ order , why doesn ’ t the same apply to a constitutionally affirmed basic human right ?
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join @ @ @ @ @

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
If an ordinary citizen had issued the threat that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer made recently in a state with vile ‘Red Flag’ gun confiscation swatting laws, they could easily experience having their door battered down at 3:00 AM in a no-knock raid to forcibly confiscate their guns, regardless if they own any or not.
To borrow the words so often used in touting these laws, a ‘Red Flag’ petition under one of these due process abominations would temporarily remove him from office since he poses a threat to others or himself. Then later, the Senator could go before a court to prove he is not a threat and have himself restored to office. His name would of course be added to the instant background check system and he would be flagged whenever he runs for re-election.
Thus would be the fate of any ordinary citizen who ran afoul of just about anyone who wanted revenge.
They would not be given the benefit of the doubt or allowed to explain away what they supposedly had done, if even they hadn’t done anything at all.
A two tiered justice system that will tear the nation apart
In the case of the Minority Leader, his words were on video for all to hear, with every inflection and nuance to prove the point. However, he won’t be removed from office in this manner because there are those who prioritize power over everything else, including individual human rights set down in our founding documents.
These are the people of the authoritarian left, which ironically includes Senator Schumer himself. For them it is far more important that they confiscate guns than protect individual liberty. Never mind that laws already exist to handle people ‘in crisis’ as they say. To them, the non-crisis was so dire that new laws that sweep away whole swaths of the Constitution were desperately needed without delay.
Back during the days of Apartheid in South Africa, the nation’s socialist left abhorred a legal code that treated some people differently than others. However, these days that kind of injustice is perfectly acceptable to them, as long as it disarms their political enemies. Forget about the fact that it turns the very idea of due process and the rest of the bill of rights on its head.
The bottom line: If ordinary citizens can be Red Flagged, why not Senator Schumer?
Of course, the obligatory due process retort from the left highlights their egregious hypocrisy. The case of the Bernie Sanders supporter who tried to kill Republican lawmakers shows that some people act on threats made by politicians.
Thus, we see that there is a very good reason the founders mandated due process and equality before the law. These are principles endorsed by conservatives and true liberals. If it’s wrong to remove Senator Schumer from office under a ‘Red Flag’ order, why doesn’t the same apply to a constitutionally affirmed basic human right?
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-06--The video to send to everyone citing the ‘97% scientist consensus’ on climate change

For decades , the climate change alarmism agenda has been raging around the globe .
But only until recently has it really gained widespread interest in the United States thanks in large part to radical progressives like Al Gore and Barack Obama .
They opened the door to the most modern versions of climate change leaders like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Greta Thunberg .
It ’ s clearly becoming a movement led by young people , yet they ’ re still echoing the same old lies .
Arguably the biggest lie in both its scope and the fact that it has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the masses is the notion that 97 % of scientists ( sometimes specified as “ climate scientists ” ) acknowledge that climate change is man-made , dangerous , and reversible if we act dramatically and immediately .
But is this oft-quoted statistic true ?
Not remotely .
The good folks at the Climate Discussion Nexus did a fabulous job of fact checking the so-called “ studies ” that back the claim echoed by climate change alarmists on a daily basis .
Do 97 % of scientists agree on anything ?
Nope , not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
For decades, the climate change alarmism agenda has been raging around the globe. But only until recently has it really gained widespread interest in the United States thanks in large part to radical progressives like Al Gore and Barack Obama. They opened the door to the most modern versions of climate change leaders like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Greta Thunberg. It’s clearly becoming a movement led by young people, yet they’re still echoing the same old lies.
Arguably the biggest lie in both its scope and the fact that it has contributed so greatly to the indoctrination of the masses is the notion that 97% of scientists (sometimes specified as “climate scientists”) acknowledge that climate change is man-made, dangerous, and reversible if we act dramatically and immediately. But is this oft-quoted statistic true? Not remotely.
The good folks at the Climate Discussion Nexus did a fabulous job of fact checking the so-called “studies” that back the claim echoed by climate change alarmists on a daily basis. Do 97% of scientists agree on anything? Nope, not even climate change.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-06--Jonathan Turley: ‘Schumer sounded more like a stalker than a statesman’

It doesn ’ t take a law professor and constitutional scholar to realize Senator Chuck Schumer ’ s threats towards Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch were inappropriate… and that ’ s IF nothing else comes from them .
They were unambiguous threats that the Senator ’ s office tried to spin as being “ misinterpreted.
” This was a lie .
The only viable interpretation is that Schumer was threatening consequences against the Supreme Court Justices if he didn ’ t get his way on an abortion bill .
While most are focused on the risks of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ others , the potential repercussions being someone acts out on those threats , there ’ s another angle that ’ s important to understand .
This was interference from one branch of the federal government against another .
It ’ s unlikely the Justices were swayed by the Senator ’ s threats , but the attempt in and of itself is worrisome in our politically polarized society .
Georgetown University law professor and constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley chimed in on Schumer ’ s remarks .
Turley , who voted for Hillary Clinton in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comments directed at the court in the past , noted the hypocrisy in coverage and reactions from the left to Schumer ’ s remarks .
When President Trump or other Republicans make less-threatening statements that seem to go after the courts , mainstream media and Democrats are up in arms .
With Schumer , it ’ s radio silence at best and tacit defense at worst .
The reality of Schumer ’ s comments is that they were intended to start this firestorm .
He wanted the attention .
He wanted Republicans to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as possible .
As our EIC noted and Tweeted : Blowback has been relatively harsh from Republicans .
Ted Cruz is coming after his fellow Senator from his chamber while House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Biggs is coming after Schumer from the lower chamber .
And while many Republicans on social media have called for harsher repercussions , including forcing Schumer out of office , the options to punish him are limited .
The way the media and the left are handling Schumer shines yet another spotlight on the hypocrisy and double standards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had made the same exact threats , it would be a media circus .
For Schumer , it ’ s politely buried .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
It doesn’t take a law professor and constitutional scholar to realize Senator Chuck Schumer’s threats towards Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch were inappropriate… and that’s IF nothing else comes from them. They were unambiguous threats that the Senator’s office tried to spin as being “misinterpreted.” This was a lie. The only viable interpretation is that Schumer was threatening consequences against the Supreme Court Justices if he didn’t get his way on an abortion bill.
While most are focused on the risks of threats coming from people in power against others, the potential repercussions being someone acts out on those threats, there’s another angle that’s important to understand. This was interference from one branch of the federal government against another. It’s unlikely the Justices were swayed by the Senator’s threats, but the attempt in and of itself is worrisome in our politically polarized society. Georgetown University law professor and constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley chimed in on Schumer’s remarks.
Schumer's threat to the Court that "you will pay the price" is a direct attack on the integrity of our courts. I criticized Trump for his reckless comments about the courts. Where is the chorus of condemnation of Schumer? Schumer sounded more like a stalker than a statesman. — Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) March 4, 2020
Turley, who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and has criticized President Trump for comments directed at the court in the past, noted the hypocrisy in coverage and reactions from the left to Schumer’s remarks. When President Trump or other Republicans make less-threatening statements that seem to go after the courts, mainstream media and Democrats are up in arms. With Schumer, it’s radio silence at best and tacit defense at worst.
The reality of Schumer’s comments is that they were intended to start this firestorm. He wanted the attention. He wanted Republicans to react and get him as much publicity as possible. As our EIC noted and Tweeted:
Chuck Schumer's threats were a publicity stunt to set up the Democrats' attack angle. They will be using "abortion access" as one of their primary weapons in November. They will claim booting @realDonaldTrump is the only way to protect Roe v. Wade from #SCOTUS.#SchemingSchumer — JD Rucker (@JDRucker) March 5, 2020
Blowback has been relatively harsh from Republicans. Ted Cruz is coming after his fellow Senator from his chamber while House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Biggs is coming after Schumer from the lower chamber. And while many Republicans on social media have called for harsher repercussions, including forcing Schumer out of office, the options to punish him are limited.
The way the media and the left are handling Schumer shines yet another spotlight on the hypocrisy and double standards present in America. If a Republican had made the same exact threats, it would be a media circus. For Schumer, it’s politely buried.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-07--Masterstroke: Mark Meadows named Chief of Staff

We ’ ve long predicted former House Freedom Caucus Chair and President Trump ’ s man in the House Mark Meadows would be Chief of Staff even before he announced his retirement from Congress .
Now that the North Carolina primary is done and his friend is in the runoff with a strong lead , it was time for the administration to make this excellent move .
As usual , it was announced through President Trump ’ s Twitter account .
Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney will be moved to United States Special Envoy for Northern Ireland .
Seriously @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believing he would just fall back to his position as head of the OMB .
Mulvaney fell out of favor with the President relatively early in his tenure after replacing John Kelly .
Then , he committed the ultimate impeachment faux pas , acknowledging in a press conference that the White House regularly engages in quid pro quo at a time when the House impeachment inquiry was trying to sell quid pro quo as a reason to impeach the President .
Meadows is a staunch conservative who has proven to be mightily adept @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Washington DC .
He has bucked the system on both sides of the aisle , contributing to the retirement of John Boehner as Speaker of the House with his caucus ’ Tea Party sensibilities towards spending .
He enters a White House that needs his stability and keen awareness of the pulse of DC .
More importantly , he brings a strong campaign understanding to help position the White House to be in reelection mode ahead of the November elections .
Mark Meadows is a conservative warrior who isn ’ t afraid to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happen .
It ’ s too early to know for sure , but I predict he will be one of the most solid forces in a White House that could use his political acumen .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
We’ve long predicted former House Freedom Caucus Chair and President Trump’s man in the House Mark Meadows would be Chief of Staff even before he announced his retirement from Congress. Now that the North Carolina primary is done and his friend is in the runoff with a strong lead, it was time for the administration to make this excellent move.
As usual, it was announced through President Trump’s Twitter account.
….I want to thank Acting Chief Mick Mulvaney for having served the Administration so well. He will become the United States Special Envoy for Northern Ireland. Thank you! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 7, 2020
Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney will be moved to United States Special Envoy for Northern Ireland. Seriously. We got that prediction wrong, believing he would just fall back to his position as head of the OMB. Mulvaney fell out of favor with the President relatively early in his tenure after replacing John Kelly. Then, he committed the ultimate impeachment faux pas, acknowledging in a press conference that the White House regularly engages in quid pro quo at a time when the House impeachment inquiry was trying to sell quid pro quo as a reason to impeach the President.
Meadows is a staunch conservative who has proven to be mightily adept at navigating the most dangerous waters in Washington DC. He has bucked the system on both sides of the aisle, contributing to the retirement of John Boehner as Speaker of the House with his caucus’ Tea Party sensibilities towards spending.
He enters a White House that needs his stability and keen awareness of the pulse of DC. More importantly, he brings a strong campaign understanding to help position the White House to be in reelection mode ahead of the November elections.
Mark Meadows is a conservative warrior who isn’t afraid to role up his sleeves and make things happen. It’s too early to know for sure, but I predict he will be one of the most solid forces in a White House that could use his political acumen.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-07--Joe Biden is the Deep State’s and Swamp’s Manchurian Candidate

It struck me as odd that in three chats and two phone conversations this week , all completely unrelated , the same topic came up without my prompting .
It was a variation of , “ How do the Democrats plan on getting Biden all the way through to the election ?
” One person flat out asked , “ Is he going to be replaced by Hillary ?
” The funniest was , “ Is Biden just a placeholder ?
” I didn ’ t go into details to anyone I spoke to on the topic because I needed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
After further review , I believe it is .
Yes , the Democrats are planning to prop him up—sometimes literally—just as they did with Hillary .
No , I do not believe he will be replaced by Hillary or that she ’ s going to be his VP choice despite some well-conceived conspiracy theories from notable conservatives on Twitter .
With that said , if she turns out to be the nominee , it only reinforces my theory .
Lastly , no , I don ’ t believe he ’ s a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what the Democratic Establishment pictures for Biden if he were to win is to play the role of figurehead .
Some have said that President George W. Bush was very much a figurehead .
I didn ’ t see the movie “ Vice ” with Christian Bale that chronicled a progressive perspective of Vice President Dick Cheney ’ s elevated role in the White House , but I know that there ’ s evidence supporting the notion that at least some of those accusations are accurate .
With Biden , it would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because he ’ s a Democrat but because he will be a patsy for the combined forces of the Deep State and the left-leaning side of The Swamp .
The Deep State will be running foreign affairs and The Swamp will be guiding domestic policy .
Biden ’ s input will be given to him one way or the other .
One of the best kept secrets in Washington DC is that this is partially the case with every presidency .
Some , like Presidents John F. Kennedy , Jimmy Carter , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the cabals and enacted more control than the Deep State and The Swamp would have liked .
Others like Lyndon Johnson , George W. Bush , and Bill Clinton let the forces behind the scenes carry far too much weight .
Biden , if elected , would be the ultimate pawn for the Deep State and The Swamp .
Unelected bureaucrats , lifetime members of the intelligence and military communities , and middlemen hand-selected by technocratic billionaires and corporations will be running the show .
All of it .
Literally all of it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This would be utterly disastrous for the nation , not just because it would take choice away from the American people but more importantly because there will be no referee at the top with the final word .
The same power struggles that have always occurred behind the scenes will turn much more brutal than ever before because it will be like the Wild West with no sheriff keeping anyone in line .
Biden likes to fancy himself a fighter , but from the start it will be made crystal clear that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the shots .
His VP will be chosen for him by the DNC on orders from the oligarchical powers behind them .
Every event will be controlled .
Every move will be orchestrated .
This isn ’ t going to happen at the convention .
It ’ s happening now .
Following his Super Tuesday victories that were only made possible by intervention from The Swamp ( with help from the Deep State ) , they made it unambiguous to him and his campaign that they were now in charge and will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ll play ball .
He has to .
They have immense sway over him from multiple angles .
They aren ’ t just dangling the nomination in front of him .
They ’ re pushing him from behind with whatever dirt they have on him .
Vice Presidents often get their hands dirtier than Presidents by being the necessary degree of separation between ugly activities below and the man at the top .
VPs are the plausible deniability presidents often need .
On the surface , they seem relatively powerless with minor control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as backup quarterback .
But some VPs , such as Cheney and Biden , got their hands much dirtier than others .
There ’ s a reason Biden oversaw Ukraine and other potentially dangerous dealings .
He didn ’ t have the same spotlight on him that President Obama had .
I know what you ’ re probably thinking .
This all sounds like a combination of tinfoil hat conspiracy theories and right-wing propaganda .
In some ways , it is both , but that doesn ’ t take away from the reality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Call me a wingnut if you ’ d like .
Lump me in with Alex Jones if that ’ s how you justify ridiculing this theory .
But ignore it at your own peril .
Biden is being groomed as the Deep State ’ s and Swamp ’ s propped-up figurehead .
He ( they ) must be stopped .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
It struck me as odd that in three chats and two phone conversations this week, all completely unrelated, the same topic came up without my prompting. It was a variation of, “How do the Democrats plan on getting Biden all the way through to the election?” One person flat out asked, “Is he going to be replaced by Hillary?” The funniest was, “Is Biden just a placeholder?”
I didn’t go into details to anyone I spoke to on the topic because I needed to be sure my theory was sound. After further review, I believe it is. Yes, the Democrats are planning to prop him up—sometimes literally—just as they did with Hillary. No, I do not believe he will be replaced by Hillary or that she’s going to be his VP choice despite some well-conceived conspiracy theories from notable conservatives on Twitter. With that said, if she turns out to be the nominee, it only reinforces my theory. Lastly, no, I don’t believe he’s a placeholder. The best way to describe what the Democratic Establishment pictures for Biden if he were to win is to play the role of figurehead.
Some have said that President George W. Bush was very much a figurehead. I didn’t see the movie “Vice” with Christian Bale that chronicled a progressive perspective of Vice President Dick Cheney’s elevated role in the White House, but I know that there’s evidence supporting the notion that at least some of those accusations are accurate. With Biden, it would be much, much worse, not just because he’s a Democrat but because he will be a patsy for the combined forces of the Deep State and the left-leaning side of The Swamp. The Deep State will be running foreign affairs and The Swamp will be guiding domestic policy. Biden’s input will be given to him one way or the other.
One of the best kept secrets in Washington DC is that this is partially the case with every presidency. Some, like Presidents John F. Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, and Donald Trump, have exerted pushback against the cabals and enacted more control than the Deep State and The Swamp would have liked. Others like Lyndon Johnson, George W. Bush, and Bill Clinton let the forces behind the scenes carry far too much weight.
Biden, if elected, would be the ultimate pawn for the Deep State and The Swamp. Unelected bureaucrats, lifetime members of the intelligence and military communities, and middlemen hand-selected by technocratic billionaires and corporations will be running the show. All of it. Literally all of it.
The fiefdoms will be distributed accordingly. This would be utterly disastrous for the nation, not just because it would take choice away from the American people but more importantly because there will be no referee at the top with the final word. The same power struggles that have always occurred behind the scenes will turn much more brutal than ever before because it will be like the Wild West with no sheriff keeping anyone in line.
Biden likes to fancy himself a fighter, but from the start it will be made crystal clear that he’s not calling any of the shots. His VP will be chosen for him by the DNC on orders from the oligarchical powers behind them. Every event will be controlled. Every move will be orchestrated. This isn’t going to happen at the convention. It’s happening now. Following his Super Tuesday victories that were only made possible by intervention from The Swamp (with help from the Deep State), they made it unambiguous to him and his campaign that they were now in charge and will be for his foreseeable future.
He’ll play ball. He has to. They have immense sway over him from multiple angles. They aren’t just dangling the nomination in front of him. They’re pushing him from behind with whatever dirt they have on him. Vice Presidents often get their hands dirtier than Presidents by being the necessary degree of separation between ugly activities below and the man at the top. VPs are the plausible deniability presidents often need. On the surface, they seem relatively powerless with minor control over the Senate and a primary role as backup quarterback. But some VPs, such as Cheney and Biden, got their hands much dirtier than others. There’s a reason Biden oversaw Ukraine and other potentially dangerous dealings. He didn’t have the same spotlight on him that President Obama had.
I know what you’re probably thinking. This all sounds like a combination of tinfoil hat conspiracy theories and right-wing propaganda. In some ways, it is both, but that doesn’t take away from the reality that it’s likely very true.
Call me a wingnut if you’d like. Lump me in with Alex Jones if that’s how you justify ridiculing this theory. But ignore it at your own peril. Biden is being groomed as the Deep State’s and Swamp’s propped-up figurehead. He (they) must be stopped.
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-06--Coronavirus and prepping basics: What you need to know

It is more than ironic that after years of ridiculing ‘ Preppers ’ , the national socialist media has suddenly seen the light in being ready for the unexpected .
This includes having extra water , food , firearms and basic first aid supplies on hand for the end of the world or everyday emergencies .
As we ’ ve seen around the world and in the states , normal supply chains aren ’ t set up for sudden surges in demand .
Therefore , it ’ s always a good idea to be stocked up on everyday necessities .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ you store For those new to ‘ prepping ’ , this is one of the basic rules .
While it is advisable to have emergency food with a long shelf life .
It also makes sense to determine your needs and plan accordingly with a 3 step process that is as easy as ABC : A. Assess what your family normally eats or uses .
B .
Buy these supplies and stock up according to expiration dates .
C. Cycle through these supplies for shelf life and that everyone will eat or use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ family normally eats or uses This is just a simple matter of observing what you normally eat or use on a daily basis then noting the shelf life of these supplies .
Obviously , fresh foods will have a short shelf life , but many have long term substitutes .
Frozen foods are an option but power outages render these less desirable , although these could be the first items consumed in a long-term emergency .
Other items have a long shelf life or virtually no expiration date .
Certain foods fall into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ better the container the longer the shelf life .
For example , tuna and other canned meats come in foil pouches , plastic containers and metal cans .
You ’ ll find that the same food in cans will have a longer shelf life because the manufacturer can be assured that it can be sealed and safe in cans .
But be sure to check for dents in the seals at the top and bottoms of the cans by running your fingers over them .
Some items have such a long shelf life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up on them to your storage capacity when they are on sale : Toilet paper , toiletries and cleaning supplies as well as batteries .
Note that some brands tout a 10 year shelf life .
Rechargeable or hand crank flashlights and headlamps are also a good option .
Buy and cycle through supplies , according to the expiration dates This is just a simple matter of listing out what you normally use and buying the versions with the longest shelf life .
While it can be useful to have long term survival @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is unpalatable it is of little use under normal circumstances .
Use the expiration dates as your guide on how certain items are cycle through your supplies .
Stock up on long term items when they are on sale .
The important point in all of this is to cycle through your supplies so that everyone is used to what is in your emergency food pantry , as well as ensuring that the contents will have as long a shelf life as possible .
The same holds true for your ammunition supply… if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your guns in a tragic boating accident .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
It is more than ironic that after years of ridiculing ‘Preppers’, the national socialist media has suddenly seen the light in being ready for the unexpected. This includes having extra water, food, firearms and basic first aid supplies on hand for the end of the world or everyday emergencies.
As we’ve seen around the world and in the states, normal supply chains aren’t set up for sudden surges in demand. Therefore, it’s always a good idea to be stocked up on everyday necessities.
Store what you eat and eat what you store
For those new to ‘prepping’, this is one of the basic rules. While it is advisable to have emergency food with a long shelf life. It also makes sense to determine your needs and plan accordingly with a 3 step process that is as easy as ABC:
A. Assess what your family normally eats or uses.
B. Buy these supplies and stock up according to expiration dates.
C. Cycle through these supplies for shelf life and that everyone will eat or use what you store.
Assess what your family normally eats or uses
This is just a simple matter of observing what you normally eat or use on a daily basis then noting the shelf life of these supplies. Obviously, fresh foods will have a short shelf life, but many have long term substitutes. Frozen foods are an option but power outages render these less desirable, although these could be the first items consumed in a long-term emergency.
Other items have a long shelf life or virtually no expiration date. Certain foods fall into this category, generally speaking, the better the container the longer the shelf life. For example, tuna and other canned meats come in foil pouches, plastic containers and metal cans. You’ll find that the same food in cans will have a longer shelf life because the manufacturer can be assured that it can be sealed and safe in cans. But be sure to check for dents in the seals at the top and bottoms of the cans by running your fingers over them.
Some items have such a long shelf life, that it makes sense to stock up on them to your storage capacity when they are on sale: Toilet paper, toiletries and cleaning supplies as well as batteries. Note that some brands tout a 10 year shelf life. Rechargeable or hand crank flashlights and headlamps are also a good option.
Buy and cycle through supplies, according to the expiration dates
This is just a simple matter of listing out what you normally use and buying the versions with the longest shelf life. While it can be useful to have long term survival food for extreme emergencies, if it is unpalatable it is of little use under normal circumstances.
Use the expiration dates as your guide on how certain items are cycle through your supplies. Stock up on long term items when they are on sale.
The important point in all of this is to cycle through your supplies so that everyone is used to what is in your emergency food pantry, as well as ensuring that the contents will have as long a shelf life as possible. The same holds true for your ammunition supply… if you haven’t lost all of your guns in a tragic boating accident.
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-06--President Trump gives hilarious explanation for Elizabeth Warren’s failure

After signing the coronavirus funding bill , President Trump took questions Friday from the press .
One question came up about whether the President thought sexism played a role in the downfall of Elizabeth Warren .
The President didn ’ t think so .
“ I think lack of talent was her problem.
” President Trump said .
“ She had a tremendous lack of talent .
She was a good debater .
She destroyed Mike Bloomberg very quickly like it was nothing .
That was easy for her but people don ’ t like her.
” This is something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump regarding Warren , but others have made the observation throughout her run for the nomination .
While she took pride in taking hundreds of thousands of selfies with people , she didn ’ t generally seem to get the same adoration as her progressive lane competition , Bernie Sanders .
“ She is a very mean person and people don ’ t like her .
People don ’ t want that , ” the President said .
Politico didn ’ t know what to think about his final comment on the issue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attack on women , echoing mainstream media ’ s narrative they tried in 2016 when President Trump called Hillary Clinton a “ nasty woman.
” But this time is very different .
What he said wasn ’ t mean .
It was hilarious .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
After signing the coronavirus funding bill, President Trump took questions Friday from the press. One question came up about whether the President thought sexism played a role in the downfall of Elizabeth Warren. The President didn’t think so.
“I think lack of talent was her problem.” President Trump said. “She had a tremendous lack of talent. She was a good debater. She destroyed Mike Bloomberg very quickly like it was nothing. That was easy for her but people don’t like her.”
This is something we haven’t heard from President Trump regarding Warren, but others have made the observation throughout her run for the nomination. While she took pride in taking hundreds of thousands of selfies with people, she didn’t generally seem to get the same adoration as her progressive lane competition, Bernie Sanders.
“She is a very mean person and people don’t like her. People don’t want that,” the President said.
Politico didn’t know what to think about his final comment on the issue.
Trump then claimed that “people like a person like me, that is not mean.” It was not clear whether he was joking.
Trump rejected a suggestion that sexism grounded Elizabeth Warren's campaign: "I think lack of talent was her problem. She had a tremendous lack of talent… she is a very mean person and people don't like her… they like a person like me that's not mean" https://t.co/Soziuhi9Qi pic.twitter.com/7jvxzq3F0k — POLITICO (@politico) March 6, 2020
This will be turned into an attack on women, echoing mainstream media’s narrative they tried in 2016 when President Trump called Hillary Clinton a “nasty woman.” But this time is very different. What he said wasn’t mean. It was hilarious.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-06--President’s hunch confirmed: HHS estimates coronavirus mortality rate at 0.1%-1%

When the President told Sean Hannity on Wednesday that he had a “ hunch ” the coronavirus did not really have a a mortality rate over 3 % as mainstream media had been widely reporting , indignant progressive journalists took turns either criticizing him or ridiculing him .
This is standard operating procedure for mainstream media , but they were especially vicious in their attacks on this particular “ hunch.
” As it turns out , the President was absolutely correct .
ADM Brett P. Giroir , M.D.
, a four-star admiral in the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) , reported today that the mortality rate of the coronavirus is likely between 0.1 % and 1 % .
That would put it somewhere between being comparable to the flu and up to six times more lethal , but nowhere near the mortality rate that ’ s been reported thus far .
The reason it is now believed by medical professionals who are examining the data that the mortality rate is lower than reported is because there are likely many more people infected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The disease is turning out to be so mild in some that they do not display symptoms before their body beats it .
Others get mildly ill and do not go to the doctor at all .
With as much hype as has been given to the coronavirus , it ’ s fortunate that it ’ s not nearly as life-threatening in the United States as it seemed to be in China .
Then again , it ’ s also possible that China is either under-reporting or simply unaware of how many people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tool often used by the Chinese Communist Party , and while it ’ s harder for them to cover up deaths , it ’ s not hard at all to cover up infection numbers .
It ’ s possible that millions are infected in China but only thousands are reported to have died from the disease .
The sad part is this : Most in mainstream media will downplay this wonderful news .
Why ?
Because it proves the President ’ s hunch correct , and the media loathes ever having to report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s great news for Americans .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
When the President told Sean Hannity on Wednesday that he had a “hunch” the coronavirus did not really have a a mortality rate over 3% as mainstream media had been widely reporting, indignant progressive journalists took turns either criticizing him or ridiculing him. This is standard operating procedure for mainstream media, but they were especially vicious in their attacks on this particular “hunch.”
As it turns out, the President was absolutely correct.
WATCH: "The best estimates now of the overall mortality rate for COVID-19 is somewhere between 0.1% and 1%," Adm. Brett Giroir, assistant secretary for health at HHS, says. "That's lower than you heard probably in many reports … it's not likely in the range of 2 to 3%" pic.twitter.com/bAvS7LNWI8 — NBC News (@NBCNews) March 6, 2020
ADM Brett P. Giroir, M.D., a four-star admiral in the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps and Assistant Secretary for Health at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), reported today that the mortality rate of the coronavirus is likely between 0.1% and 1%. That would put it somewhere between being comparable to the flu and up to six times more lethal, but nowhere near the mortality rate that’s been reported thus far.
The reason it is now believed by medical professionals who are examining the data that the mortality rate is lower than reported is because there are likely many more people infected than what’s publicly known. The disease is turning out to be so mild in some that they do not display symptoms before their body beats it. Others get mildly ill and do not go to the doctor at all.
With as much hype as has been given to the coronavirus, it’s fortunate that it’s not nearly as life-threatening in the United States as it seemed to be in China. Then again, it’s also possible that China is either under-reporting or simply unaware of how many people are actually infected. Disinformation is a tool often used by the Chinese Communist Party, and while it’s harder for them to cover up deaths, it’s not hard at all to cover up infection numbers. It’s possible that millions are infected in China but only thousands are reported to have died from the disease.
The sad part is this: Most in mainstream media will downplay this wonderful news. Why? Because it proves the President’s hunch correct, and the media loathes ever having to report anything positive about him even if it’s great news for Americans.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-06--If you’re relying on government to protect you from the coronavirus, you’re doing it wrong

The rapidly spreading coronavirus is not the U.S. government ’ s fault .
When it finally subsides or is eliminated , it will not be due to government intervention , either .
It IS the responsibility of government to make resources available and to handle logistics if the disease spreads so widely that such things become necessary , but for now and until it gets really bad , WE are the first line of defense .
The second line of defense is , of course , medical personnel .
Some will point out that government is responsible for getting enough @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there ’ s a very valid argument against mass distribution at this time , which I ’ ll get to in a moment .
The third line of defense is local , city , county , and if necessary state government .
The federal government is a distant fourth when it comes to protection against the coronavirus .
With that said , the role of the federal government at this time is collecting research being done here and around the world and alerting the people at appropriate levels of what to do and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , DC is responsible for consolidating and disseminating data , and in that regard the Trump administration has been exceptional .
There are travel bans that have already been enacted , much to the dismay of WHO and Democrats at the time , but those are decisions that mitigate risk .
Those decisions DO NOT protect us other than reducing the potential for outbreaks .
However , that does not in any way negate our requirement to mind ourselves and our families .
The White House could have completely closed borders and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ How ?
Because it ’ s been here since before China even let the world know about it .
Back to the argument about tests .
It behooves the government and us to not be given free and unlimited access to tests .
As China learned , the majority of infections occurred at hospitals .
We do not need every kid with the sniffles crowding hospitals and doctor ’ s offices to get tested .
By limiting the amount of tests being administered , we are reducing the spread of the disease .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ release of tests , so be it .
But even then , we should avoid hospitals whenever possible .
We are the first line of defense .
As has been published numerous times , washing hands properly , avoiding touching your face when out in public , and minimizing contact with other people are the best ways to avoid infection .
For those who are forced to be out in the wild , proper precautions are in order .
This is no time to panic , but it ’ s incumbent on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ! )
to be smart and avoid risks whenever possible .
The coronavirus has been weaponized by Democrats and their proxies in the mainstream media to paint this as a loss for President Trump .
They spin the stories every way possible to assign as much blame as they can on the President , the Vice President , and the administration ’ s actions .
But a lucid , honest examination of everything that has been done so far reveals it has been handled as well as it could be by the government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guess decisions after the fact , but the White House and Congress have had adequate and appropriate responses outside of politicizing it all .
In the macro , government needs to be involved with the coronavirus .
But at the individual , micro level , the onus falls on every American to protect themselves , their families , and their communities by treating the coronavirus with appropriate respect .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
The rapidly spreading coronavirus is not the U.S. government’s fault. When it finally subsides or is eliminated, it will not be due to government intervention, either. It IS the responsibility of government to make resources available and to handle logistics if the disease spreads so widely that such things become necessary, but for now and until it gets really bad, WE are the first line of defense.
The second line of defense is, of course, medical personnel. Some will point out that government is responsible for getting enough coronavirus tests out to them, but there’s a very valid argument against mass distribution at this time, which I’ll get to in a moment. The third line of defense is local, city, county, and if necessary state government.
The federal government is a distant fourth when it comes to protection against the coronavirus. With that said, the role of the federal government at this time is collecting research being done here and around the world and alerting the people at appropriate levels of what to do and how to react. In other words, DC is responsible for consolidating and disseminating data, and in that regard the Trump administration has been exceptional.
There are travel bans that have already been enacted, much to the dismay of WHO and Democrats at the time, but those are decisions that mitigate risk. Those decisions DO NOT protect us other than reducing the potential for outbreaks. However, that does not in any way negate our requirement to mind ourselves and our families. The White House could have completely closed borders and the virus would have still been here. How? Because it’s been here since before China even let the world know about it.
Back to the argument about tests. It behooves the government and us to not be given free and unlimited access to tests. As China learned, the majority of infections occurred at hospitals. We do not need every kid with the sniffles crowding hospitals and doctor’s offices to get tested. By limiting the amount of tests being administered, we are reducing the spread of the disease. If the time comes for a mass release of tests, so be it. But even then, we should avoid hospitals whenever possible.
We are the first line of defense. As has been published numerous times, washing hands properly, avoiding touching your face when out in public, and minimizing contact with other people are the best ways to avoid infection. For those who are forced to be out in the wild, proper precautions are in order. This is no time to panic, but it’s incumbent on the collective (yes, a leftist word!) to be smart and avoid risks whenever possible.
The coronavirus has been weaponized by Democrats and their proxies in the mainstream media to paint this as a loss for President Trump. They spin the stories every way possible to assign as much blame as they can on the President, the Vice President, and the administration’s actions. But a lucid, honest examination of everything that has been done so far reveals it has been handled as well as it could be by the government. It’s easy to second guess decisions after the fact, but the White House and Congress have had adequate and appropriate responses outside of politicizing it all.
In the macro, government needs to be involved with the coronavirus. But at the individual, micro level, the onus falls on every American to protect themselves, their families, and their communities by treating the coronavirus with appropriate respect.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


noqreport--2020-03-06--DNC hopes to rush Biden nomination before voters get buyer’s remorse

The Democratic Establishment got their wish on Super Tuesday with a resurgent Joe Biden coming out on top and taking the delegate lead .
All of the major competitors other than Bernie Sanders were eliminated .
It ’ s now the former Vice President and his hope of being a continuation of the Obama administration versus the Democratic Socialist who wants to burn it all down and start over .
It ’ s an ideal situation for the DNC , at least it would have been in previous election cycles .
But in their effort to make things seem “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the foot by prohibiting winner-take-all primaries .
That means they ’ re stuck with what will almost certainly be a long primary season that may go all the way to the convention in July without a mathematical delegate winner .
With step-1 of their master plan behind them , they ’ re now moving onto step-2 : Burn Bernie faster .
They have every reason to want to wrap this up quickly for Biden .
They need time to push party unity and win back the radical progressive backers of Sanders that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need to preserve as much of the campaign funds as possible for the general election ; Biden has proven to be inept at fundraising throughout the campaign .
But the biggest reason they need to hurry this nomination process along is fear of “ buyer ’ s remorse ” among their base .
Biden is a gaffe-machine , which everyone knows , but lately he ’ s been appearing more challenged than usual .
His old gaffes were those of a man who often spoke before he thought .
Recently , he ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , spilling out rhetoric that seems taxed by repetition and failing mental acuity .
Is he going senile ?
That ’ s a question that some Democrats are starting to ask and many Republicans are starting to push .
Even the President has been chiming in about it being “ obvious ” the former Vice President doesn ’ t always know what ’ s going on around him .
If Democratic voters get cold feet , they may look back at Sanders and think they ’ d rather have a socialist who knows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than a moderate who often appears lost .
Biden ’ s biggest weakness is himself .
The DNC believes they can manage him through the general election .
They ’ re just not sure they can keep him on track now that he has the lead in the primary race .
This isn ’ t going to end well for them .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Subscribe for free to the America First Report newsletter.
The Democratic Establishment got their wish on Super Tuesday with a resurgent Joe Biden coming out on top and taking the delegate lead. All of the major competitors other than Bernie Sanders were eliminated. It’s now the former Vice President and his hope of being a continuation of the Obama administration versus the Democratic Socialist who wants to burn it all down and start over.
It’s an ideal situation for the DNC, at least it would have been in previous election cycles. But in their effort to make things seem “fair,” they shot themselves in the foot by prohibiting winner-take-all primaries. That means they’re stuck with what will almost certainly be a long primary season that may go all the way to the convention in July without a mathematical delegate winner.
With step-1 of their master plan behind them, they’re now moving onto step-2: Burn Bernie faster. They have every reason to want to wrap this up quickly for Biden. They need time to push party unity and win back the radical progressive backers of Sanders that they’re currently upsetting. They also need to preserve as much of the campaign funds as possible for the general election; Biden has proven to be inept at fundraising throughout the campaign.
But the biggest reason they need to hurry this nomination process along is fear of “buyer’s remorse” among their base. Biden is a gaffe-machine, which everyone knows, but lately he’s been appearing more challenged than usual. His old gaffes were those of a man who often spoke before he thought. Recently, he’s been having trouble with those thoughts, spilling out rhetoric that seems taxed by repetition and failing mental acuity.
Is he going senile? That’s a question that some Democrats are starting to ask and many Republicans are starting to push. Even the President has been chiming in about it being “obvious” the former Vice President doesn’t always know what’s going on around him. If Democratic voters get cold feet, they may look back at Sanders and think they’d rather have a socialist who knows where he is at any given moment than a moderate who often appears lost.
Biden’s biggest weakness is himself. The DNC believes they can manage him through the general election. They’re just not sure they can keep him on track now that he has the lead in the primary race. This isn’t going to end well for them.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]