nationalfile--2020-11-04--WATCH: Trump Team To Sue Over Democrat Voter Fraud, Claims Victory In Pennsylvania

SharpieGate is being investigated by election officials , says Arizona State Sen. Kelly Townsend

Last Updated on November 4, 2020
The President Donald Trump campaign declared Trump victorious in the state of Pennsylvania and Rudy Giuliani declared new lawsuits to fight against the Democrats’ widespread use of paper mail-in ballots that they have not shown to Republicans in any way, shape, or form. Giuliani accused Democrats of trying to steal the election, and vowed not to let it happen. Giuliani was joined at the press conference by former Florida attorney general Pam Bondi and former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski.
Giuliani said that the paper ballots could be from Mars, or from the Democratic National Committee. Giuliani assured that NO Republicans have seen the paper ballots being used by Democrat election officials. Giuliani spoke of how “120,000 ballots mysteriously appeared” at 3 o’clock in the morning in Wisconsin. “This is the way they intend to win.” Giuliani said that Democrats are doing the same thing with paper ballots in Arizona, Nevada, and Detroit, Michigan. He spoke of crooked big-city machines.
“We’re not going to let them get away with it,” Giuliani said, referring to the elites who don’t care about people because they feel they are so powerful because of their media power. Pam Bondi joined Giuliani in declaring a Trump victory in Pennylvania, as did Lewandowski. The President’s son Eric Trump also declared that Trump has won Pennsylvania. Trump holds a commanding lead in the state with 87 percent of the precincts reporting. Trump poll watchers are being kept out of observing the process, according to Bondi.
On Pennsylvania, National File previously reported:
White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany has tweeted out that Pennsylvania has fallen into the Trump column. Twitter has branded McEnany’s tweet with their promised warning label that information may be in dispute.


nationalfile--2020-11-06--BREAKING: Trump Projects Confidence, Says ‘If You Count The Legal Votes, I Easily Win’

`` If you count the legal votes , I easily win .
If you count the illegal votes , they @ @

Last Updated on November 5, 2020
President Donald Trump spoke publicly about the 2020 presidential election for the first time since late at night on Election Day, in a powerful speech that projected optimism while maintaining that legal avenues would be pursued to fight election rigging.
“If you count the legal votes, I easily win. If you count the illegal votes, they can try to steal the election from us,” President Trump said.
“If you count the votes that came in late, we’re looking at them very strongly, but a lot of votes came in late,” President Trump added. “I’ve already decisively won many critical states, including massive victories in Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Ohio, to name just a few. We won these and many other victories despite historic election interference from Big Money, Big Media, and Big Tech.”
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1324499759248384001
READ MORE: TOTAL WAR: Don Jr. Calls Out Weak GOP, Says Trump Should Declare ‘Total War’ Over Voter Fraud
On Wednesday, the Trump campaign claimed victories in Pennsylvania, Georgia, North Carolina, and Michigan:
President Donald announced on Twitter Wednesday afternoon that the Trump campaign is claiming electoral victories in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Georgia, the State of North Carolina, and the State of Michigan, in an unprecedented decision that rejects the technocratic censorship of Big Tech and the mainstream media. “We have claimed, for Electoral Vote purposes, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (which won’t allow legal observers) the State of Georgia, and the State of North Carolina, each one of which has a BIG Trump lead,” President Trump announced on Twitter. “Additionally, we hereby claim the State of Michigan if, in fact, there was a large number of secretly dumped ballots as has been widely reported!” the President added.
Results for the remaining disputed states may not be publicly announced until next week.


nationalfile--2020-11-05--SUSPICIOUS: Minnesota, Wisconsin Both Had Unrealistic 89%-90% Voter Turnout

Last Updated on November 5, 2020
With an estimated 161 million voters turning out this election cycle we are seeing historic voter turnout percentages across the country. But even with the increased mail-in voter participation and the extended deadlines, it is statistically unlikely that any state would reach the 90 percent voter turnout number.
But that’s what we are supposed to believe when it comes to the voter turnout in Minnesota and Wisconsin.
According to voting totals researched by Fred Sauer at GatewayPundit, Minnesota has experienced a 90 percent voter turnout in the 2020 General Election. Minnesota’s average voter turnout in the previous four General Election cycles was a distant 77 percent.
So, too, did Wisconsin see a dramatic increase in its voter turn out. This election cycle they experienced an 89 percent voter turnout where their previous four General Election cycle average stands at 69.75 percent.
By contrast – and adjusting for population, Florida achieved a 79 percent voter turnout, Iowa a 75 percent turn out and Texas a 69 percent voter turnout.
The recognized battle ground states had turn outs of:
Pennsylvania – 66 percent
Ohio – 65 percent
Michigan – 74 percent
https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1324208870584180738
On Minnesota and Wisconsin, National File recently reported that Biden received a suspicious 100% of votes counted during late night vote counting:
An analysis of the state and county hourly voting tallies in both Wisconsin and Michigan reveals significant jumps in Democrat candidate Joe Biden’s vote totals. These vote total jumps – which came in single instance ballot dumps as reported by ABC News and Nate Silver’s Five-Thirty-Eight. In Wisconsin, at between 2 a.m. and 3:30 a.m. ET, the total number of votes increased by 125,000. Of these 125,000 votes, 100% were for Biden, without a single vote for President Trump recorded.
Minnesota and Wisconsin find themselves this election cycle as critical must-win states for both candidates. Minnesota carries an Electoral College weight of 10 votes as does Wisconsin.


nationalfile--2020-11-06--VIDEO: Reps. Jim Jordan, Scott Perry Stand With Trump, Slam ‘Impeachment Attempt Number Three’

`` They are setting the stage to potentially steal an election , '' said Sen. Ted Cruz .

Last Updated on November 5, 2020
Representatives Jim Jordan and Scott Perry defended the integrity of the election and slammed what amounts to “impeachment attempt number three.”
Appearing on Fox News, Jordan and Perry, representatives from Ohio and Pennsylvania respectively, slammed the state of the election as a “horrific embarassment,” with the multiple reports of voting irregularities and potential fraud.
First, it was the Russia hoax. Then, it was Ukraine. Now? It's election integrity.@RepScottPerry's right, the Democrats are attempting #impeachment number 3. pic.twitter.com/fJ30bBH2qn — Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) November 6, 2020
Jordan said that Perry, himself, and “lots of other Americans are out fighting for this President for making sure that this election is fair, that only legitimate and legal votes are counted”:
We want all votes counted, but they’ve got to be legitimate, they’ve got to be legal. Not illegitimate votes, not votes that come after the election with no distinguishable postmark date… That’s craziness, so we’re out their fighting, and I know lots of Americans are doing the same.”
Perry described the election in Pennsylvania, where President Trump currently has a narrow lead according to votes reported, as a “horrific embarassment” for Pennsylvania, along with the country at large:
For two hundred and thirty three years, Americans have found their way to vote – through foreign wars, through civil wars, through pandemics and natural disasters, before we even had cars. Now in the 21st Century we can’t find a way to do this, and even in one of the counties that are counting the votes in my race, they’ve stopped again for the night… In Philadelphia they’re defying the court order – they won’t let people watch! We just want to observe. We’re not saying only Republicans, anybody should be able to watch! This is not their process, this is our process, this is the American people’s process!
READ MORE: Trump Projects Confidence, Says “If You Count The Legal Votes, I Easily Win”
The representative from Pennsylvania asked how anybody could have trust in the process when the election is being counted behind closed doors, referring to an event in Detroit where windows around the absentee ballot count were covered up with cardboard. He argued that “nobody believes” when hundreds of thousands of votes show up that just “all happen to be for Joe Biden.”
The scene at Detroit’s absentee ballot counting center is growing more heated. The windows now being covered up. Allegations of violations. Sec. of State says she welcomes challenges. pic.twitter.com/oUL4A0h3Ku — Matt Finn (@MattFinnFNC) November 4, 2020
In Nevada, counting is still going on, and will likely still be counting for days to come. “Why is it that our state of Ohio can be done on election night, a state of eleven and a half million people… but Nevada for the last 48 hours, a state a third of our size, hasn’t given us one update on the vote tally in their state?” Jordan asked. “Why is it always Democrat run cities in swing states that have all kinds of problems and take days and days and days to get us the vote count?”
Perry simply said that what is happening now is attempt number three to eject Donald Trump from the office of President of the United States. “We had Russian collusion, then the impeachment, so this is just the third large attempt,” Perry said:


nationalfile--2020-11-06--Utah Attorney General Calls Out Voter Fraud, Declares Leave of Absence to Help Trump’s Legal Team

`` Burn in hell Joe Biden , burn in hell Bill Gates , burn in hell Fauci , America is @ @

Last Updated on November 6, 2020
Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes has announced a leave of absence from his position in the state to work with President Donald Trump’s legal team as he prepares to challenge election results in key battleground states that initially reported wide victory margins for the president, but after days of discovering and counting mail-in ballots went to Joe Biden.
“Despite months of predictions about a ‘blue wave,’ @GOP kept the Senate & expanded seats in the House,” wrote Reyes. “Biden & his allies know @POTUS will win if only verified, #legal votes are counted.”
He added that, presumably at least in Utah, “we are making sure that happens” but adds that it “looks like courts may have to decide” the fate of the presidency in the United States.
On personal leave time to help prepare and support litigation in several states dealing with compromised election process. — Sean Reyes (@SeanReyesUT) November 6, 2020
Reyes then added that he is “On personal leave time to help prepare and support litigation in several states dealing with compromised election process.”
Yesterday President Trump confirmed National File’s reporting that Republican vote counting observers have not been allowed in Michigan or Pennsylvania, despite state law and a court order in Pennsylvania giving the Republicans permission to observe.
National File reported:
In a statement to the media, Pam Bondi said “We’re not going away, and now we are going to take further remedy to fix this.” Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski top Republican lawyer Pam Bondi addressed the press in Philadelphia, where they say Republicans are were still being kept from keeping an eye on the ballot count. They are being denied access to view the count despite being presented with a court order. The Sheriff has also refused to come down and enforce the court order, provoking a fiery speech in which Lewsndowski questioned, “What are you hiding?”
Additionally, National File has reported extensively on SharpieGate in Arizona, where a video told voters explicitly not to use a Sharpie marker on their ballots, which some claim invalidates them, prior to another video telling voters that use of sharpies was required.


nationalfile--2020-11-09--FACT CHECK: No, Brits Aren’t Setting Off Fireworks to Celebrate Biden’s “Victory”

Senate Lindsey Graham ( R-SC ) said he will be requesting the Department of Justice and the Postmaster General ...

Last Updated on November 9, 2020
Media reports that Brits are setting fireworks to celebrate Joe Biden’s “victory” are massively overstated, with Bonfire Night being celebrated this week.
Mainstream news outlets prematurely called the election for Biden on Saturday, despite there being a number of states that are going to recounts, like Georgia and Pennyslvania, and with other states, such as Arizona and Nevada, being too close to call at the time of writing.
These same mainstream news outlets then also declared the rest of the world was celebrating the apparently imminent departure of President Trump from the White House.
“Fireworks lit up the night sky over London, England, after Joe Biden was characterized to be the apparent winner of the presidential election,” wrote ABC, while The Hill declared that “fireworks [were seen] in London, Edinburgh, as Biden win celebrated abroad.” Slate collated some of the “best celebrations of Donald Trump’s electoral defeat,” arguing that “the rest of the world is also glad to get rid of Trump.”
WATCH: Fireworks in London, Edinburgh as Biden win celebrated abroad https://t.co/dqPLRPso6i pic.twitter.com/xAOzXP79AU — The Hill (@thehill) November 8, 2020
They included a few tweets from Brits with videos and reports of fireworks supposedly celebrating Biden’s ascension:
Fireworks in London. This isn’t a US celebration, it’s a worldwide one. Let the healing begin. — Lauren S. Hissrich (@LHissrich) November 7, 2020
Fireworks for #bidenharis2020 here in SW London. We’re celebrating with you, America. It’s a much longer for win for us, too. pic.twitter.com/2UiPW5Ftyq — Nikki Baughan (@NikkiBaughan) November 7, 2020
Even here in the UK my neighbours are setting of fireworks and shouting in celebration of Biden’s win pic.twitter.com/5GVv3HokHe — N.B 🥔 (@Eternal_Stress) November 7, 2020
I’m not sure what Edinburgh is celebrating, but I’m claiming it’s for Biden and Harris! 🥳 #bidenharis2020 pic.twitter.com/Baovybu4XN — Sebastian Pohl (@SebastianPohl) November 7, 2020
However, what these outlets failed to mention is that it is highly unlikely any of the firework displays included in their reporting had anything to do with the American election.
November 5th is Bonfire Night in the United Kingdom, where Brits celebrate the foiling of the Gunpowder Plot to blow up Parliament and assassinate King James I in 1605 by Guy Fawkes and his co-conspirators. Traditionally, bonfires would be built, and a model of Guy burned on the 5th, and the celebrations would be complete with fireworks.
READ MOREL FACT CHECK: No, The English Language is Not More Likely to Spread Coronavirus
In modern times, the party is sometimes shifted to the Friday or Saturday if the 5th falls on a work day, so people have time to celebrate properly. Others celebrate at any point during the week, especially if they have spare fireworks. Brits would have seen fireworks go off across the country all from at least Monday through Saturday last week, this author included.
It didn’t take long therefore, for Brits to pick up on the reporting, and begin mocking it:
https://twitter.com/GerardBattenUK/status/1325548292273561600
Umm… you guys should deffo google what happens around this time in November in London every year… https://t.co/L8wyCBZ29b — Tom Harwood (@tomhfh) November 7, 2020
Sixteen million followers. And they now all know you’re thick as mince. 😂😂😂 — Dick Delingpole (@DickDelingpole) November 8, 2020
Oh honey, this is to celebrate something quite different. Google it: it’s crazy. — Tim Stanley (@timothy_stanley) November 8, 2020
IT’s CALLED BON FIRE NIGHT!!! Or do you yanks eat turkey in November in celebration of our Christmas light switch ons???… — Donella Frump (@Rogers_Forager) November 8, 2020
Fun fact: #BonfireNight was widely celebrated in the 13 colonies, and was an especially big deal in Massachusetts. George Washington ordered people to stop marking it because he hoped to win Canada, with its sizeable Catholic population, to the revolution. pic.twitter.com/s60mNBci4U — Daniel Hannan (@DanielJHannan) November 8, 2020
Certified Brit @JackHadders tells me the fireworks are for “bonfire week” (some monarchist holiday) in Britain and that this story is bullshit. https://t.co/OPBwj8DNT3 — Pete D’Abrosca (@pdabrosca) November 8, 2020
After facing much ridicule from the British public, many outlets then swiftly deleted their tweets, Facebook posts, and articles, or updated them to better reflect reality, without any corrections.
An earlier version of the story from The Hill, which was also reported in Slate, included a claim that church bells in Paris were ringing to celebrate, but this was also untrue.
“I live in Paris, I didn’t hear a single bell ringing, I went to check the news to see if it was me who heard nothing, not one article about a single bell ringing, so it’s either a very isolated church no one gives a shit about or it’s plain old storytelling,” one commentor said.


nationalfile--2020-11-09--AOC Hints She May Quit Politics, Criticizes Unsupportive, ‘Hostile’ Democrats

`` The President has every right to look into allegations and request recounts under the law , and notably , @

Last Updated on November 9, 2020
As the 2020 General Election continues to be counted and litigated one election result is clear, Democrats lost big in the US House of Representatives. And amidst criticism from House Democrat leadership that extremism cost them seats in the chamber, one member of “The Squad” is threatening to quit rather than cooperate.
US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), rejected the idea that the extreme Marxist positions that Progressives pushed in the election were the central cause of Democrats losing seats in the House. She also threatened to “quit politics.”
“Externally, there’s been a ton of support, but internally, it’s been extremely hostile to anything that even smells progressive,” she complained to The New York Times. When asked about her future the Congresswoman said, “I genuinely don’t know. I don’t even know if I want to be in politics.”
Immediately after it became clear that Democrats were going to lose seats in the House, mainstream Democrats took to a conference call blasting the Progressive wing of the party.
“No one should say ‘defund the police’ ever again,” Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA), said passionately. “Nobody should be talking about Socialism.”
Spanberger continued on to address the elephant in the room, saying if Democrats don’t change their messaging ahead of the 2020 midterm elections, “We will get f—king torn apart.”
Democratic lawmakers expressed frustration with party leaders over the loss of several congressional seats, saying House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and others oversold their prospects. The Democrats are angry & bitter reps of their constituents. https://t.co/98uw19My3V via @WSJ — Jeremy Dostoyevsky (@wiosal) November 6, 2020
Separately, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), told reporters, “We’re not for the New Green Deal, we’re not for Medicare for All. We can’t even pay for Medicare for some.”
He addressed the issue of the AOC Marxist influence saying, “Basically labeling every Democrat as a Socialist or supporting Socialism, that’s not who we are. It’s not who I am is not how we were raised. And it hurt a lot of good Democrats in rural America, Montana, for one. Other places around the country.”
Ocasio-Cortez appeared to just steamroll on, ignoring the concerns of those in her caucus.
Last Friday, November 6, Ocasio-Cortez tweeted, “Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future.”
Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) November 6, 2020
Social media lit up equating her to 20th Century dictators like Stalin in the Soviet Union, Mao in Communist China, Pol Pot in Cambodia, and Hitler for suggestion that a list be made to employ in political retaliation.


nationalfile--2020-11-10--EXCLUSIVE: Boris Johnson’s Message to Biden Shows Remnants of Congratulations for Trump’s Re-electio

EXCLUSIVE: Boris Johnson’s Message to Biden Shows Remnants of Congratulations for Trump’s Re-election

On Monday , U.S. Rep. Lance Gooden announced a lawsuit filed against the Dallas County Elections Office , alleging ...

Last Updated on November 10, 2020
Boris Johnson’s message to former vice president Joe Biden and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) on their supposed election win shows remnants of congratulations to President Trump, National File can reveal.
After the US media declared that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris had won the presidential election, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson tweeted out a congratulatory message to the pair.
“Congratulations to Joe Biden on his election as President of the United States and to Kamala Harris on her historic achievement,” the statement read. “The US is our most important ally and I look forward to working closely together on our shared priorities, from climate change to trade and security.”
However, further detailed inspection of the image posted by Johnson reveals that beneath the message there is the remains of another congratulatory message, but to President Trump, not Biden and Harris.
One Twitter user was the first to notice that when analysing the image in Photoshop, and even just with the naked eye with a careful look, “Trump” can be seen just above “Biden.”
https://twitter.com/CoofSpreader/status/1326027501173264384
READ MORE: Betting Website Shows Trump’s Odds At Winning Election Improving As More Fraud, Lawsuits Emerge
Further references can be seen to what appears to be “second term” above “look,” and “the future of this” under “shared priorities.”
https://twitter.com/CoofSpreader/status/1326032335750377472
National File consulted an independent expert in graphic design, who posited a theory on what had occurred. The expert noted that the fractals in the image suggested the unseen bits of text were sloppily removed with the paint bucket tool, suggesting the text layer could not be edited as a whole, meaning the image had been already saved previously.
This would imply that the message congratulating President Trump on his victory had already been prepared, and ready to go, and that Boris Johnson and Downing Street did not think the creation of two images was necessary, expecting the President to be re-elected.
The expert added that it is likely the image began being edited in one form with Photoshop’s paint bucket tool, when the creator assumed only small bits of text needed changing. When it became apparent the whole text needed to be redone, the graphic designer likely attempted to erase the entire first message, but failed to notice the remnants of his first attempt to edit the image. “By this point, the creator would likely not have noticed the tiny fractals left from the first edit,” they explained.
National File contacted Downing Street for comment and did not receive an immediate reply.
Update: A government spokesperson acknowledged the gaffe posted to Johnson’s Twitter account, and claimed that the error happened because of the “closely-contested” US election, supporting President Trump’s claim of the election being illegitimate.
This article was updated to include information about a statement from a UK government spokesperson.


nationalfile--2020-11-10--BREAKING: UK Prime Minister’s Explanation For Biden Congrats Tweet Supports Trump’s Claim Of Illegit

BREAKING: UK Prime Minister’s Explanation For Biden Congrats Tweet Supports Trump’s Claim Of Illegitimate Election

Facebook banned the founder of its competition , claiming he is a `` dangerous individual '' or part of a @

Last Updated on November 10, 2020
A UK government spokesman admitted to the hidden message in Boris Johnson’s tweet congratulating Biden, that showed President Trump’s name, blaming the “closely-contested election.”
National File broke the story on Tuesday that there was a fragment of a message to President Trump in Boris Johnson’s congratulations message to Joe Biden. The mainstream British press then picked up on the story, forcing the government to respond.
A government spokesperson said: “As you’d expect, two statements were prepared in advance for the outcome of this closely-contested election. A technical error meant that parts of the alternative message were embedded in the background of the graphic.”
This statement would seem to acknowledge that President Trump has, thus far, refused to concede the election, and is pursuing lawsuits over credible claims of voter fraud in six battleground states.
As National File reported:
After the US media declared that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris had won the presidential election, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson tweeted out a congratulatory message to the pair. “Congratulations to Joe Biden on his election as President of the United States and to Kamala Harris on her historic achievement,” the statement read. “The US is our most important ally and I look forward to working closely together on our shared priorities, from climate change to trade and security.” However, further detailed inspection of the image posted by Johnson reveals that beneath the message there is the remains of another congratulatory message, but to President Trump, not Biden and Harris. One Twitter user was the first to notice that when analysing the image in Photoshop, and even just with the naked eye with a careful look, “Trump” can be seen just above “Biden.” National File consulted an independent expert in graphic design, who posited a theory on what had occurred. The expert noted that the fractals in the image suggested the unseen bits of text were sloppily removed with the paint bucket tool, suggesting the text layer could not be edited as a whole, meaning the image had been already saved previously. This would imply that the message congratulating President Trump on his victory had already been prepared, and ready to go, and that Boris Johnson and Downing Street did not think the creation of two images was necessary, expecting the President to be re-elected.
https://twitter.com/CoofSpreader/status/1326032335750377472
National File again contacted 10 Downing Street for comment on their use of the phrase “closely contested” to explain Johnson’s apparent gaffe and did not receive an immediate response.


nationalfile--2020-11-11--ANALYSIS: 10,000 Dead People Voted in Michigan Using Mail-in Ballots

Democrats did n't like that a Republican won NC-09 in 2018 .
So they claimed ballot harvesting , and got @

Last Updated on November 11, 2020
Analysis of the election data from Michigan shows thousands of people who are provably deceased voted in the November 3, 2020 General Election. This analysis proves that President Trump was spot on where the use of mail-in ballots in elections was concerned.
The analysis, provided by Richard Baris, the director of the Big Data Poll company, reveals that more than 10,000 people both confirmed or suspected dead returned mail-in ballots to vote in Michigan this past election.
The data gleaned from the analysis indicates voter fraud; that somebody other than the person named on the ballot tried casting the vote on behalf of these people.
“It’s also entirely possible that some of them aren’t even real people,” Baris told reporters. “If someone is 110 or some ridiculous age, we should have their death record but do not.”
Just under 10k confirmed dead returned absentee ballots in Michigan. We're done, for now. While I'm open to the idea some of these have been rejected, I'm not open to any outright dismissal they all were rejected. This was a small, tested listed that suggests irregs are plenty. — Rich "The People's Pundit" Baris (@Peoples_Pundit) November 8, 2020
About 9,500 voters who were confirmed dead through the Social Security Death Index are marked in Michigan’s database as having returned mail-in ballots. Another roughly 2,000 are registered as being 100 years old or more.
Tracy Wimmer, spokeswoman for the Michigan Secretary of State, said even if somebody did try to vote on behalf of someone who was deceased the ballot would be detected, and the vote would be rejected.
Baris was less than confident in Wimmer’s statement.
“While I’m open to the idea some of these have been rejected, I’m not open to any outright dismissal they all were rejected,” he tweeted.
Wimmer said that information on how many ballots were rejected during ballot processing and vote tabulations isn’t available yet, adding, “[A] ballot received for a living voter may be recorded in a way that makes it appear as if the voter is dead.”
The Trump campaign has litigation outstanding against the State of Michigan alleging election malfeasance.


nationalfile--2020-11-13--BREAKING: Kyle Rittenhouse’s Mom Announces Lawsuit Against Joe Biden On Tucker Carlson Tonight

`` Kyle is a caring young man .
He went to Kenosha to help people .
What Joe Biden did @ @

Last Updated on February 17, 2022
The mother of a 17-year-old teen who is currently residing in jail and faces murder murder charges after defending himself on video against violent protesters in Kenosha appeared on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight” to announce a lawsuit against Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden, who used her son’s image to make false claims about white supremacy in an election campaign.
“You saw the Joe Biden campaign smear your son as a white supremacist. What was your reaction to that?” Carlson asked Kyle Rittenhouse’s mom Wendy.
“How dare [Joe Biden] do that to my son,” Wendy Rittenhouse said. “That’s my son that he did that too, and I’m not gonna back down to him. And [Kyle Rittenhouse] is not a white supremacist, and he’s not a racist. He’s my son, and I know him, and he is none that, what Joe Biden said.”
READ MORE: Kenosha Rioter Repeatedly Says ‘Shoot Me N**ga,’ Gets Shot Multiple Times Moments Later
“Kyle is a caring young man. He went to Kenosha to help people. What Joe Biden did, showing my son’s picture and labeling him a white supremacist – I will take him down,” Wendy Rittenhouse added.
WENDY RITTENHOUSE: "Kyle is a caring young man. He went to Kenosha to help people. What Joe Biden did, showing my son's picture and labeling him a white supremacist — I will take him down." Wendy is asking for donations at https://t.co/rSv9fyAon5. pic.twitter.com/nb6WrCwFIf — August Takala (@AugustTakala) November 13, 2020
Wendy Rittenhouse went on to ask viewers to donate to her son’s legal defense fund at FightBack.Law, so that she can see him again.
“We’re raising money to try to get him home, I just need people to help me to bring my son home, please donate anything you can,” she said.
READ MORE: VIDEO: Rittenhouse Lawyer Lays Out ‘100% Self Defense’ Case For Kyle, Reveals New Info About Case
In October, Rittenhouse’s legal team released an 11-minute documentary that laid out the case for the teen’s defense using a intensive compilation of video footage from the night the incident occurred. The video quickly went viral and was promptly banned from its hosting platform.


nationalfile--2020-11-12--BREAKING: Federal Election Commission Chair Calls Election ‘Illegitimate’ Due To Voter Fraud

Last Updated on November 12, 2020
Trey Trainor, the Chairman of the Federal Election, stated during an appearance on Newsmax this Thursday that he “does believe there’s voter fraud taking place,” and confirmed that the refusal to allow poll watchers to observe the ballot counting process – among numerous other irregularities – does indeed constitute an “illegitimate election.”
“I do believe that there is voter fraud taking place in these places,” Trainor said. “Otherwise they would allow the observers to go in.”
“When you have claims of 10,000 people who don’t live in the state of Nevada having voted in Nevada, when you have the video showing where people are either duplicating a spoiled ballot right there, or they’re in the process of just marking a ballot that came in blank for a voter, that’s a process that needs to be observed by election observers,” Trainor said.
The FEC Chairman added that poll observers are legally allowed to be present during the counting of ballots, and if they are refused entry to a place where the vote is being tabulated then “the law is not being followed, making this an illegitimate election.”
https://twitter.com/thehangingchads/status/1326951639878668296
Trainor went on to forecast that some of the Trump campaign’s legal challenges to the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election will likely end up in the Supreme Court.
National File reported this week that U.S. House Rep. Lance Gooden has filed a lawsuit related to refusals to allow GOP poll watchers to observe ballot counting in Texas:
On Monday, U.S. Rep. Lance Gooden announced a lawsuit filed against the Dallas County Elections Office, alleging that the office refused to comply with local law and allow Republican Party poll watchers to observe the vote counting process. “Repeat violations of ballot counting procedures,” which include preventing Republicans from being present during the mail-in ballot tallying process, led to a lawsuit against the Dallas County Elections Office. “Voters deserve to see how their ballots are counted,” Gooden said in a statement provided to the press. “Democrat-run governments on every level will do anything to tip the scales in their favor. We’re not going to let them get away with it.”
In Detroit, poll observers boarded up windows and screamed at poll observers to leave while the latter chanted “Let us in” while locked outside of the vote counting area.


nationalfile--2020-11-14--GEORGIA: Ex-Kemp Staffer Lobbies For DOMINION, Voting Madness Leads To Lame ‘Recount’

Timestamps and text messages debunk the idea that Fulton County had to stop counting votes for an ...

Last Updated on November 13, 2020
Georgia Republican governor Brian Kemp’s former chief of staff lobbies for Dominion Voting Systems, the embattled George Soros-linked company that flipped votes from President Donald Trump to Joe Biden in the 2020 election. Dominion products were used in Georgia, where massive vote-counting problems plagued the hearts of the citizenry.
The New York Review of Books reported: “In Georgia, election integrity advocates managed to stop state lawmakers from passing a bill in 2018 (SB403) that would have enabled universal use ballot-marking devices. But lawmakers went ahead and passed a new bill (HB316), enabling them in 2019. Georgia has since purchased BMDs from Dominion, whose lobbyist, Jared Thomas, was Governor Brian Kemp’s chief of staff and press secretary from 2012 to 2015 when Kemp was secretary of state. Dominion’s partner in the state is KNOWiNK, a supplier of electronic poll books, which are used to sign in voters and confirm voter registrations. KNOWiNK’s founder and CEO, Scott Leiendecker, is a former Republican election official whose wife donated $2,500 to the campaign of Georgia’s current secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, in November 2018.”
The Georgia election in 2020 was an absolute mess, with a burst pipe at State Farm Arena used to justify late-night vote-counting in Fulton County that gave Joe Biden a mystical lead.
Not surprisingly, considering Governor Kemp and the Secretary of State’s connections to Dominion and its Georgia partner, the “recount” in Georgia was quite lame Friday, with no actual auditing of the ballots as expected.
NATIONAL FILE REPORTED:
In announcing that the State of Georgia would execute a recount of the ballots cast in the 2020 General election, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, intimated that the exercise would put to bed concerns about vote fraud in the election. Now, questions are surfacing about the methods being used to execute that recount.
Raffensperger, a Republican, said in announcing the recount, “This will help build confidence. It will be an audit, a recount and a re-canvas all at once.” He said all of the 159 counties in Georgia execute the hand recount and that it should be completed by the deadline for the state to certify the election results, November 20, 2020.
But reports are coming out of vote tabulating centers that the recount effort is nothing more than a duplicate of the initial process which would effectively do little to audit the process.
Molly McCann, who is of counsel to Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell, tweeted out, “Attention, Georgia. The Georgia Republican leaders are selling us out. I am listening to @jfradioshow on Bannon’s War Room, and he is reporting that the Georgia recount is a farce. They are using one observer for ten teams, which means the observers are only able to…”
Attention, Georgia. The Georgia Republican leaders are selling us out. I am listening to @jfradioshow on Bannon's War Room, and he is reporting that the Georgia recount is a farce. They are using one observer for ten teams, which means the observers are are only able to… — Molly McCann Sanders (@molmccann) November 13, 2020
McCann’s tweet continued, “…watch 10% of the action. They aren’t checking signatures or matching absentee votes with addresses. Essentially, it is a pure recount that will re-tabulate the bad ballots.”
Attention, Georgia. The Georgia Republican leaders are selling us out. I am listening to @jfradioshow on Bannon's War Room, and he is reporting that the Georgia recount is a farce. They are using one observer for ten teams, which means the observers are are only able to… — Molly McCann Sanders (@molmccann) November 13, 2020
Raffensperger has come under intense fire from the Trump campaign, which requested the hand executed manual recount.
He has taken further fire from Sens. David Perdue (R-GA), and Kelly Loeffler (R-GA), who called for his resignation over his handling of their races, which heads to an all-important January 5, 2021, runoff election, and the election in general.
“The management of Georgia elections has become an embarrassment for our state,” the Perdue and Loeffler said in a statement. “We believe when there are failures, they need to be called out – even when it’s in your own party.”


nationalfile--2020-11-13--Intel Officials Confirm Biden Isn’t Getting National Security Info Yet Because He Isn’t POTUS

Last Updated on November 13, 2020
The office of the Director of National Intelligence confirmed this week that Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden is not receiving sensitive national security information and related intelligence reports because the General Services Administration has not confirmed the winner of the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
“ODNI follows the statutory direction provided in the Presidential Transition Act, which requires ascertainment of the candidate by the administrator of GSA prior to supporting a potential presidential transition,” the office of Director National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told NBC News in a statement this week. “ODNI would not have contact with any transition team until notified by the GSA administrator.”
Biden is also not receiving the President’s Daily Brief because President Donald Trump has not authorized the release of the various intelligence reports contained within to the Biden team.
An National File reported earlier this week, the office of GSA head administrator Emily Murphy has not signed an official letter of ascertainment declaring Biden as the president-elect, drawing the ire of Democrat activists and left-wing media outlets as well as several Republican senators.
“An ascertainment has not yet been made. GSA and its administrator will continue to abide by, and fulfill, all requirements under the law,” a spokesman with the GSA told reporters, adding that GSA administrator, Emily Murphy, will only execute a transition of power when a “clear winner is clear based on the process laid out in the Constitution.” If the GSA were to have made a determination that a transition of power was to be executed, the Biden campaign would be provided federal tax dollars for travel and salaries.
Republican senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told CNN this week that he thinks Biden should begin receiving sensitive national security intel right way, stating, “Yeah, I think he should.”
Oklahoma senator James Lankford (R-OK) has gone even further, threatening to “step in” to force the GSA to certify a Biden election win because he’s “on the committee of oversight.”
However, the decision of ascertaining the winner of the presidential election for the purposes of distributing classified information does not fall to the Senate, but rather to the GSA.


nationalfile--2020-11-17--Iowa State College Republicans Get Defederated By RINOs for Pro Second Amendment Tweet

Agitator rushed Trump supporters with a knife and said `` I will kill you ! ''

Last Updated on November 16, 2020
The Iowa State College Republicans have been defederated from the organisation following a tweet that advocated using arms in self-defence.
Following the premature declaration by the mainstream media that Vice President Joe Biden was set to be the next president, the Iowa State College Republicans’s Twitter account sent out a tweet, encouraging people to “arm up” and to “expect these people to attempt to destroy your life, [because] the elites want revenge on us.”
The tweet was swiftly picked up by leftist accounts, and was forced to be deleted following a backlash. Ryan Hurley, the chair of the ISCRs, told the Des Moines Register that their thought in writing the tweet “was to support everyone in their right to bear arms,” adding that “people have sickly twisted it. Violence is not our intent.”
Following the tweet, the Iowa Federation of College Republicans moved to defederate the ISCRs from the organisation on the basis of “inflammatory tweets, inappropriate behaviour, and a disregard for fellow citizens”: Although we all identify as Republicans, the IFCR Executive Board and Central Committee wish to convey inclusivity and diversity of opinions; including within the party structure. Furthermore, the IFCR functions to support Republican policy, priorities, and politicians on Iowa college campuses. While we do promote civil discourse over these ideas, we as a federation unequivocally condemn any real or perceived threat of violence.
The cancel culture “Republicans” strike again. Very low energy, very cringe! https://t.co/A7YlIYUAjY — College Republicans United at Iowa State🌪 (@IStateCRU) November 11, 2020
The statement was supported by the University of Iowa College Republicans, who it was noted are further away ideologically from the America First agenda that the ISCRs supported.
https://twitter.com/ChiefTrumpster/status/1326431854631727104
“We are really very saddened that this act of cancel culture took place,” Hurley said in an exclusive quote to National File. “We are one of the most active chapters in the Midwest, and look forward to continuing to push America First ideals.”
Other College Republicans across the country supported the ISCRs against the Iowa Federation, with the California College Republicans even declaring that they would only deal with the ISCRs “until such time this poor decision is retracted.”
Funny how the progressives only made @IStateCRs stronger by attacking them! 🇺🇸 — Texas Federation of College Republicans (@txfcr) November 13, 2020
We have elected to recognize and coordinate with @IStateCRs as the official representatives of Iowa until such time this poor decision is retracted by @officialifcr. @IowaGOP https://t.co/VbkUim2HFA — California College Republicans (@cacollegegop) November 11, 2020
Iowa State University had also put out a statement at the time of original tweet. “Iowa State University is aware of a social media post by one of its student organizations, encouraging others to ‘arm up,'” the statement read. “Any suggestion of armed activity by an Iowa State student organization is prohibited by university policy. Any conduct that violates university policy will be addressed in an appropriate manner.”
However, following an inquiry from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, noting that the discussion of armed activity is protected by the First Amendment, the university backed down and issued a second statement.
“The protections afforded by the First Amendment and similar provisions in the Iowa Constitution are core values of the university and are foundational to the university’s mission to create, share, and apply knowledge to make Iowa and the world a better place,” the new statement read.
Iowa State responded to our concerns by affirming that it only seeks to punish possession and use of prohibited weapons on campus — not expression — and that the College Republicans will not face disciplinary action for their tweet. pic.twitter.com/Dwi2l1Iov9 — FIRE (@TheFIREorg) November 11, 2020
UPDATE: Students and staff of Iowa State University have signed a mass open letter condemning the ISCRs, and attacked the university for not punishing them for their tweet, which the letter claimed “incites violence and creates a campus climate that feels threatening to and isolates students, faculty, and staff of marginalized and historically oppressed populations”:
Privileging the free speech of those causing harm over the safety of the historically marginalized members of our community furthers the damage and sends the message that the Iowa State University community does not value their presence, despite numerous condemnations in recent months of this exact kind of behavior. It is clear that the administration’s statements during a summer that served as a referendum on racism in this country, were merely symbolic and they now serve as further evidence of its history of denouncing some harmful behaviors, only to abdicate themselves of responsibility when given the opportunity to show their commitment through action.
The demands of the letter include the removal of the ISCRs until the last member of the society has graduated, and an update to the student code of conduct that addresses “how the institution responds to speech by students and student organizations that promote hate, directly or indirectly threaten the physical safety and free movement of members of the campus community, potentially incite violence, or violates the Principles of Community.”
Speaking exclusively to National File, Hurley revealed that some of the College Republicans have faced discrimination both from students and staff on campus. “We’ve been facing quite a few attacks here on campus,” Hurley said. “We have been repeatedly harassed both in classes and out on campus. We are waiting for Administration to respond and are ready to ensure free speech is protected here at Iowa State.”
Following further investigation, it was discovered that in 2017, the Iowa State Young Democratic Socialists of America made direct death threats towards President Trump and capitalists.
“COMRADES: stay away from needle drugs! The only dope worth shooting is in the oval office [right now],” the Iowa State YDSAs tweeted in September that year. “The left has done a good job radicalizing juggalos, weebs, furries, but I will not rest until ‘hXc’ [which stands for hardcore] stands for hang+Xterminate capitalists,” the account also tweeted in October.
However, at the time, Iowa State University declared that their statements “fall under free speech,” despite them coming very close to directly inciting violence.


nationalfile--2020-11-16--Here’s How State Legislatures Can Save a Stolen Election

The Trump campaign has ongoing litigation in four states, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, and Pennsylvania as recounts happen in Wisconsin and Georgia. But the question of what can be done if provable actions of vote fraud and ballot tampering are left in place had taken center stage. There is something that can be done.
While the Biden campaign attempts to falsely brand Joe Biden “president elect,” the fact of the matter is this. The election isn’t even close to being over. Just as the lack of a concession speech from President Trump negates Biden’s claim to “president-elect” so, too, does it open the door for a constitutional and legal solution.
The President of the United States, as most people know if they were lucky enough to have been made to take a Civics or US History class in school, is not elected directly by the public. Instead, the President and Vice President are elected in a vote in the Electoral College.
The brilliance of the Electoral College is in that it protects the nation from falling into majority rule or mob rule, even as it protects the rights of the minority.
But very few understand the process in which the Electoral College chooses the President and Vice President.
The Electoral College process is mapped out in the US Constitution and is governed by the Electoral Count Act, an 1887 law amended in 1948.
This law, as amended, is comprehensive, and sets the exact day that the Electoral College is mandated to meet: The Monday after the second Wednesday of December.
On that day (in 2020 this falls on December 14) the electors appointed by each state formally meet to cast their votes. This day is mandated and is not reschedulable; it is a hard deadline that is mandated and codified into federal law. States must have their electors chosen by then.
REMINDER TO THE REPUBLICAN STATE LEGISLATURES, YOU HAVE THE FINAL SAY OVER THE CHOOSING OF ELECTORS, NOT ANY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY OF STATE, GOVERNOR, OR EVEN COURT. YOU HAVE THE FINAL SAY — ARTICLE II OF THE FED CONSTITUTION. SO, GET READY TO DO YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY — Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) November 5, 2020
In the event that a state does not have a slate of electors seated due to a litigated or otherwise disputed election, the Electoral Count Act explicitly accounts for what to do if electors cannot be chosen by voters:
“Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct.”
Federal law unambiguously empowers the states – through their legislators – to decide how a state’s electoral votes shall be awarded if no electors have been seated because an election has “failed to make a choice.”
In fact, there is Supreme Court precedent codified into law in the Bush v. Gore ruling in the election of 2000. The High Court majority affirmed that, “…the State legislature’s power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself…”
If the law is to be followed with fidelity, the state legislators in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Arizona, and other states where disputes – for any reason – may arise must openly declare that they will only accept a Biden victory after thorough and complete investigations of all allegations of fraud and malfeasance have been satisfied.
If these investigations are obstructed in any way and by anyone, they must – by the mandate of federal laws – exercise their Constitutional power to choose electors that restore the will of the people.


nationalfile--2020-11-17--EXCLUSIVE: After Election, Facebook Will Now Ban You If You Are ‘Similar Looking’ To Someone They Ba

EXCLUSIVE: After Election, Facebook Will Now Ban You If You Are ‘Similar Looking’ To Someone They Banned

As the mainstream media continues to insist there is no evidence of vote fraud more solid evidence ...

Last Updated on November 17, 2020
National File has exclusively obtained comment from Facebook representatives who say that the platform will now ban conservative groups and pages if they are look similar to other groups and pages that they have banned for violating their Community Standards.
In the days before the election, National File reported that the once-massive Facebook page, God Emperor Trump, was unceremoniously banned from the platform for the 7th time. While communicating with Facebook Politics and Government Outreach Associate Danielle Cyr, at the direction of Facebook Public Policy Director for Global Elections Katie Harbath, National File was informed of this new policy.
When asked if the God Emperor Trump Facebook page actually violated any of the platform’s Community Standards, Cyr acknowledged that the page did not, and provided a link to Facebook’s updated Community Guidelines, which state:
We’ve long prohibited people from creating new Pages that look similar to those we’ve previously removed for violating our Community Standards. In early 2019, we updated our recidivism enforcement to prevent those who have had Pages removed for violating our Community Standards from using duplicate Pages to continue the same activity. According to our updated recidivism policy, when we remove a Page for violating our policies, we may remove other Pages and Groups even if that specific Page has not met the threshold to be unpublished on its own. This is determined by looking at a broad set of information, including whether the Page has the same people administering it or has a similar name to the one we’re removing.
Cyr then added additional context to the ban, explaining that “Your page was removed according to these policies and will not be reinstated. Additional similar looking pages and groups can also be removed,” emphasis added by National File.
When National File noted that most posts to the page were simply articles or popular pro-Trump memes, and asked whether this means all pro-Trump Facebook pages and their administrators may be banned from the platform due to this policy, we did not receive a response.
Big tech titans of industry are currently testifying before Congress to determine how they may have interfered in the 2020 election, with Zuckerberg claiming the platform’s post-election censorship of Republicans was an effort to curb political violence.


nationalfile--2020-11-18--Biden Appoints ‘Anti-Free Speech’ Zealot to Transition Team Propaganda Post

The hypocrisy of the Progressive Left in California ’ s elected class is on full display as they thumb ...

Last Updated on November 18, 2020
With the election still far from over and not one state certified in the ballot counts, Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden has pre-maturely started assembling a “transition team.” And while he bloviates about unity and the United States not being “Red” or “Blue,” the picks for his team are saying something completely different.
One of the newly created positions Biden has crafted – and one that no other transition team has ever had, is the position of “Team Lead” for the US Agency for Global Media.
If you’ve never heard of the US Agency for Global Media, you are not alone. But some of the entities that come under that brand are the Voice of America, the Middle East Broadcasting Networks, and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
Biden has tapped Richard Stengel, a former Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs in the Obama administration. He held this position from 2014 to 2016.
During his time at the State Department, Stengel led the department’s counter-disinformation efforts. This effort included starting the first counter Russian disinformation hub at the department.
The creation of this propaganda arm of the State Department led to an Obama executive order creating the Global Engagement Center. The center’s sole task is to deal with disinformation globally.
Shockingly, Stengel advocates for certain restrictions on free speech.
Last year, Stengel wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post declaring that US freedom of speech was too unfettered and that “changes must be considered.”
In The Post op-ed Stengel argued, “ [A]s a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier…All speech is not equal. And where truth cannot drive out lies, we must add new guardrails.”
“I’m all for protecting ‘thought that we hate,’” Stengel continued, “but not speech that incites hate.”
Biden appoints “anti-free speech” & pro-censorship Richard Stengel to transition team media post He’s said: “All speech is not equal…I’m all for protecting thought that we hate, but not speech that incites hate” He also praises social media censorshiphttps://t.co/b6JMOBOUzZ — ELIJAH SCHAFFER (@ElijahSchaffer) November 17, 2020
Hate, just as in the act of defining hate speech, is subjective and, therefore, the meaning is not common among all peoples.
In in May, Stengel, who until his appointment was employed as an MSNBC analyst, defended restrictions on speech regarding the coronavirus saying, “The First Amendment doesn’t protect false speech about a virus or false speech that endangers the health of your users. And by the way, Facebook and Twitter have been taking things down, but they need to be even more vigilant about it, and Google needs to be even more vigilant about what they prioritize in their search results.”
Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley sounded an alarm about Stengel’s appointment Tuesday, saying “[I]t would be difficult to select a more anti-free speech figure to address government media policy, one has to assume that Biden will continue the onslaught against this core freedom as president.”


nationalfile--2020-11-19--WISCONSIN RECOUNT: Out Of 176 Recount Workers, Only 58 Are Republican

With the two most Democrat leaning counties being recounted Democrats re-examining the ballots outnumber Republicans 41 to ...

Last Updated on November 19, 2020
In one of the most outrageous and lopsided politically partisan acts of the 2020 General Election, the Wisconsin Elections Commission has seated 118 Democrats to the 176 recount poll worker positions giving access to just 58 Republicans to the process.
The Commission issued a statement Wednesday announcing that it will engage in a recount effort in just two Wisconsin counties, Milwaukee and Dane. Milwaukee County is home to its namesake city, Milwaukee, and Dane County is home to the state capital, Madison.
Milwaukee and Dane counties are both the most populated counties and the most Democrat-leaning.
The decision to execute the recount, which is not mandatory in the State of Wisconsin no matter how close the race results are, was arrived at after the Trump campaign paid a $3 million dollar filing fee. A full recount for the state would have cost the Trump campaign in the neighborhood of $8 million.
According to Jim Hoft at the GatewayPundit, one Republican officer from Dane County said, “Only 12 out of 176 names submitted by the Republicans were accepted by the commission as recount workers.”
Since pressure has been applied by the public toward this overt exercise in partisanship, the Wisconsin Elections Commission upped the number of Republicans by 46, decreasing the ratio from 41:3 to 2:1.
https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1329478650798993409
As it stands, Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden leads President Trump in Wisconsin 49.6 percent (1,630,673) to 48.9 percent (1,610,065). A difference of less than 1 percent of the votes cast.
With a ratio of 2 to 1, the recount, paid for by the Trump campaign, will be done predominantly by Democrats with scant Republican oversight.


nationalfile--2020-11-19--Election Fraud Expert: Michigan’s Election Results Are ‘Physical Impossibility’

Last Updated on November 19, 2020
The claims of unexplained anomalies by Wayne County, Michigan, election board canvassers are validated by one renowned election fraud experts who states, definitively, that Michigan’s election results – across the state and not just in Wayne County – are a “physical impossibility.”
The examination of the Michigan voter data was performed by Russell Ramsland, the co-owner of Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG). His company specializes in detecting election fraud, cybersecurity, open source intelligence and global security services. Ramsland served in the Reagan administration and has worked for both NASA and MIT.
In the affidavit concerning the election in Michigan, Ramsland determined – without question – that vote fraud and ballot tampering took place in the 2020 General Election in Michigan determining the results as they are currently known to be a “physical impossibility.”
In addressing the Dominion Voting System, Ramsland was critical of its security over-all citing “vulnerabilities to hacking and tampering, both at the front end where Americans cast their votes, and at the back end where the votes are stored, tabulated, and reported.”
Ramsland noted that the vulnerabilities described are well-known by experts in the voting securing field and that these vulnerabilities have been extensively written about.
In explaining how the systems logs are tantamount to “uprotected,” Ramsland said that anyone with an elementary knowledge of computer systems could “arbitrarily add, modify, or remove log entries” causing a log event to take place. That the logs are unprotected makes the alterations to the tabulations undetectable.
“My colleagues and I… have studied… the November 3, 2020, election results. Based on the significant anomalies and red flags that we have observed, we believe there is a significant probability that election results have been manipulated…” Ramsland wrote.
His colleague, Dr. Andrew Appel, a professor of computer science at Princeton University and an election security expert, said, “I figured out how to make a slightly different computer program that just before the polls were closed it switches some votes around from one candidate to another. I wrote that computer program into a memory chip and now to hack a voting machine you need just 7 minutes alone with it and a screw driver.”
Ramsland goes on to write in his affidavit that, “There are a stunning 3,276 precincts where the Presidential Votes Cast compared to the Estimated Voters based on Reported Statistics ranges from 84% to 350%… reveals 431,954 excess ballots.. This pattern strongly suggests that the *additive algorithm* was activated.”
His affidavit goes on to say, “Until the tabulated voter turnout reached approximately 83%, Trump was generally winning between 55% and 60% of every turnout point. Then, after the counting was closed at 2:00am, the situation dramatically reserved itself, starting with a series of impossible spikes.”
But it is the final red-flag that Ramsland and his team found that provides the smoking-gun of vote fraud and ballot tampering; that convinced Ramsland and his team there was, indeed, a crime committed in Michigan.
“The final red flag is perhaps the greatest,” Ramsland wrote. “In the data are 4 spikes totaling 384, 733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined interval of only 2 hours and 38 minutes. This is physically impossible given the available equipment at the 4 reference locations.”
Ramsland continued to point out that, that the Dominion system reported 46 out of 47 precincts displaying a highly unlikely 96 percent voter turnout as the number of votes cast. He added that using the Secretary of State’s number of voters in the precincts, 25 of those 47 precincts show a highly suspect 100 percent turnout.
He noted that the pattern suggests with a great deal of certainty that both the fraudulent additive algorithm was activated in the code and that “batch processing of blank votes” also took place resulting in 74,119 more ballots cast than the capacity.
Ramsland warned about Dominion Voting System machine vulnerabilities before the election was even executed.
https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1327511568993701888
Michigan election canvassers in Wayne County, one of the counties flagged as having corrupted election results, have refused to certify the election.


nationalfile--2020-11-21--ROGER STONE: Bill Gates, Microsoft Designed Election Fraud Software Used By Dominion

As if getting caught red-handed violating his own restrictions on COVID weren ’ t enough California Governor Gavin Newsom ...

Last Updated on November 21, 2020
Roger Stone, the longtime political veteran who has been identified as one of the progenitors of the Stop the Steal movement for election integrity in the United States, released a video explaining that he has evidence Microsoft, at the direction of Bill Gates, designed the vote counting software used to commit election fraud by Dominion Voting Systems and competing companies.
Stone explained that Microsoft, at Gates’ instruction, “designed a software called Election Guard” that has “been used by Dominion, as well as Election Services, Hurt Intercivic, Clean Ballot, Election Systems and Hardware, BPro, and SmartMatic.”
“In other words, 100% of the voting machines and voting systems in this country are using the same software that Dominion has been using to switch votes,” said Stone.
Dominion Voting Systems has been repeatedly accused of using vote counting software that can switch votes if an administrator desires. Trump campaign attorney Sidney Powell made these claims publicly last Thursday.
Since Powell charged Dominion with supplanting the will of the American people and stealing the election, over 100 Dominion Voting Systems employees have purged their LinkedIn accounts, and the company reneged on its promise to meet with Pennsylvania lawmakers on Friday.
“The denial by the mainstream media that there’s any evidence whatsoever is ludicrous. The evidence is overwhelming and compelling. Whether Sidney Powell, a fine attorney who isn’t given to making claims she can’t back up in court, can bring a case without the cooperation of the Central Intelligence Agency and the FBI to come clean remains to be seen.”
Bill Gates has remained at the center of several COVID-19 scandals, as the billionaire likely stands to profit from the mass vaccination campaign soon to be underway in much of the civilized world.
Gates was also recently tied to the infamous “Antifa U-Haul” that was seen delivering shields and other supplies to rioters in Louisville, Kentucky.


nationalfile--2020-11-22--BLACKLIST: Harvard Students Spread Petition To Ban Trump Administration From Teaching, Speaking, Att

BLACKLIST: Harvard Students Spread Petition To Ban Trump Administration From Teaching, Speaking, Attending University

The American mainstream news media may not want to touch the story about the Biden-China connection with ...

Last Updated on November 22, 2020
As if obstructing the investigations of the multitude of vote fraud and ballot tampering claims weren’t enough, now the Progressive intelligentsia in higher education is attempting to implement their own version of a “truth and reconciliation commission.”
The caustic totalitarianism of the Progressive movement has seen a plethora of conservatives and Republicans banned from speaking and/or teaching in institutions of higher learning. Now, those same forces want to take that banishment a step further.
A petition circulating among the student body at one of the nation’s most prestigious institutions of higher learning, Harvard University, seeks to ban anyone who served in the Trump administration from teaching, speaking, or attending the institution.
The petition represents the latest attempt by the “enlightened” Leftists in the United States to rebuke President Trump and punish those who support him or believe in his vision for the country.
The petition reads, in part:
“We worry that in following tradition and inviting members of the Trump administration to Harvard, the school would be legitimizing this subversion of democratic principles that up to now had been universally accepted by both political parties. “That is why today we are asking you to set up a system of accountability for high-level political appointees and Trump administration consultants before they are invited as fellows or to teach or speak on campus. These accountability guidelines should be publicly shared with students by the end of the calendar year.”
Petition circulating at Harvard to stop former @realDonaldTrump administration officials from attending, teaching or speaking at the university. Communists doing what communists do… https://t.co/fN44kBtl9z — Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) November 18, 2020
Students, who by their station are subservient to the authority of the institution, are demanding that if the university does continue associating with any Trump administration alumnus, declare that the university must “create and share with students transparent guidelines” for why this association should be allowed.


nationalfile--2020-11-23--KRAKEN UPDATE: Powell To Sue Dominion, Smartmatic In New Lawsuit After Separating From Trump Campaig

KRAKEN UPDATE: Powell To Sue Dominion, Smartmatic In New Lawsuit After Separating From Trump Campaign

At the center of several of the lawsuits currently being pursued by the Trump campaign is this ...

Last Updated on November 23, 2020
Attorney Sidney Powell released a statement tonight on CBS News clarifying that she “will continue to defend the foundations of this great Republic” and that she will be “filing suit soon” against Dominion and Smartmatic for allegedly electronically switching of millions of votes from President Donald Trump to Joe Biden, in what she describes as “massive fraud.” This comes after the Trump Campaign announced that she was not a member of the Trump Legal Team on November 22, 2020.
Rudy Giuliani’s official statement from the Trump Campaign reads as follows: “Sidney Powell is practicing law on her own. She is not a member of the Trump Legal Team. She is also not a lawyer for the President in his personal capacity.”
The statement sparked confusion and concern among Trump supporters, who took to the internet to voice their opinions on the new developments. Bryson Gray, a popular Christian, conservative, Trump-supporting musical artist went on Twitter today and said this:
Personally, I think it was dumb to release a statement like that with no context. It’s just gonna bring down the morale of the base because people are gonna think too much of it. Very dumb move IMO. — ALBUMS OUT NOW (@RealBrysonGray) November 22, 2020
Dinesh D’Souza, creator of the pro-Trump documentary “Trump Card” had this to say:
I just saw this and I really don’t know what to make of it pic.twitter.com/2AWgpWSXS8 — Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) November 22, 2020
While various discussions ensued on what could possibly be going on with the controversial, swamp-angering Sidney Powell, former National Security Advisor and “Spygate” victim, General Michael Flynn gave Americans an update to the situation when he tweeted this:
https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1330671677211029506
Flynn was not the only deep state target to put out a tweet amid the drama. Former 2016 Trump Campaign foreign policy advisor, George Papadopoulos, tweeted this cryptic message:
We have the numbers. We have the power. — George Papadopoulos (@GeorgePapa19) November 23, 2020
For Powell’s part, she issued a response to CBS News over the weekend.
“I understand today’s press release. I will continue to represent #WeThePeople who had their votes for Trump and other Republicans stolen by massive fraud through Dominion and Smartmatic, and we will be filing suit soon. The chips will fall where they may, and we will defend the foundations of this great Republic. #KrakenOnSteroids”
While Powell has brought national attention to Dominion and Smartmatic for potentially undermining the integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election, this is not the first time these companies have faced scrutiny or criticism. Documents found on Wikileaks have outlined several concerns that the U.S. State Department had with Smartmatic in 2006. The documents state this:
Smartmatic is a riddle. The company came out of nowhere to snatch a multli-million dollar contract in an electoral process that ultimately reaffirmed Chavez’ mandate and all-but destroyed his political opposition. The perspective we have here, after several discussions with Smartmatic, is that the company is de facto Venezuelan and operated by Venezuelans. The identity of Smartmatic’s true owners remains a mystery. Our best guess is that there are probably several well-known Venezuelan businessmen backing the company who prefer anonymity either because of their political affiliation or, perhaps, because they manage the interests of senior Venezuelan government officials.
The 2006 Wikileaks papers are still available online.
Dominion voting machines have also been known to be easily hacked and manipulated, as was reported on during a segment on MSNBC in 2019. The video was uncovered by Jack Posobiec and subsequently posted on his Twitter account. Watch the video on Twitter here:
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1330364450935812100
Powell claims that President Trump was fraudulently cheated out of victory in the 2020 Presidential Election as a result of companies like Dominion and Smartmatic electronically manipulating the vote count in various states across America. If she can successfully prove that President Trump won the election by millions of votes, of which were lost due to widespread voter fraud, she will have uncovered the largest criminal scandal in the history of the United States.
For now, the country awaits, but as Powell noted on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo, she does not have a record of making claims she can’t prove.


nationalfile--2020-11-24--VIDEO: Florida Holocaust Museum Unveils New George Floyd Exhibit

Two top union bosses have given a thumbs down to Socialist Bernie Sanders as Labor Secretary in ...

Last Updated on November 25, 2020
A Holocaust museum in Florida has opened up a photographical exhibit dedicated to George Floyd, an alleged fraudster and convicted felon who died in police custody earlier this year, receiving criticism and derision online as a result.
The Holocaust Memorial Resource & Education Center in Orlando, Florida, is housing the exhibit, entitled “Uprooting Prejudice: Faces of Change,” which features 45 photos of different individuals reacting to the death of George Floyd. Floyd died in Minneapolis police custody in May this year, with his death sparking riots, looting, and civil unrest across the country.
Lisa Bachman, the assistant director of the Holocaust Center, said the exhibit was designed so that people could come and “look these individuals in the eye”:
So you come face to face with people, so you can really experience the feelings that they were feeling. You don’t just see this exhibit. You feel it. The expressions and thoughts of each person photographed tells a story that has a very universal message. It is one that can heal and bring us together. It shows us we are not alone in our thinking.
The photographs, which include an image of the father of Michael Brown Jr, who was shot while running towards a police officer in 2014, were all taken by John Noltner. “I hope that through these stories and these faces, you can understand the events of our day in a new way,” Noltner said.
I hope you can challenge some of your own preconceptions and I hope you can see the humanity of each and every person. When I photograph a person – no matter who they are – I strive to leave a simple message: I see you. I hear you. And you matter. When George Floyd was killed that happened 11.6 miles north of my house and I knew with the piece of my mind’s goal being to hear voices that aren’t always heard as well as they should be. I knew that I wanted to go to that site.
The reaction to the exhibit online was not positive, with many arguing that it “waters down the message” of the museum, “trivializes” the Holocaust, and puts the American police system on the same footing as the Nazi regime.
Holocaust museums including images of George Floyd Waters down their message behind repairing Can’t compare the two
https://t.co/LU5ZhRymay — ELIJAH SCHAFFER (@ElijahSchaffer) November 22, 2020
There absolutely is a place for this photographic memorial to Floyd. The images have merit, its creator is well-intentioned & America is a free country. But not at this location. That's all I'm saying. It's politicising and positioning is all wrong — Martin Daubney (@MartinDaubney) November 22, 2020
George Floyd is added to a Holocaust museum? That trivializes and distorts the Holocaust and its six million Jewish victims. And it grotesquely implies that American police are Nazis. https://t.co/zNsG0bqyEe — Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 (@ezralevant) November 22, 2020
https://twitter.com/TheWearyGrump/status/1330361413806796803
Attaching George Floyd to the Holocaust lays the groundwork for responding to cops/white people with levels of violence that would normally be reserved by real Nazis. It’s far more than inappropriate. It’s mentally preparing people to become exterminators. — SpiritualBreak (@SpiritualBreak) November 22, 2020
https://twitter.com/ItsReedyy/status/1330414242202345472
The Florida Holocaust Museum in St Petersburg, a separate institution from the Memorial Center located in Orlando, released a statement on the exhibit, as some online commentators had confused the two.
“For decades, The Florida Holocaust Museum has honored the memory of millions of innocents who suffered or died in the Holocaust, and we believe no comparisons should be made between other historical or current events and the Holocaust,” the statement reads.
The Holocaust museum in Florida issued a statement that say they are not affiliated with the George Floyd exhibition but it is another center that did that @lackboys3 pic.twitter.com/ehPUm5we6L — Odi F. (@odifass) November 23, 2020
National File reported in September about “The Free State of George Floyd,” an “autonomous zone” set up around the site of Floyd’s death in Minneapolis, which included a memorial for Floyd, and directions for cyclists to “prioritise space for BIPOC community members and visitors.”


nationalfile--2020-11-25--BREAKING: Trump Issues Full Pardon For General Michael Flynn

GETTYSBURG COLONEL : PA Sen. Mastriano Says Election Chaos Is 'By Design ' , Worse Than Afghanistan

Last Updated on November 25, 2020
President Donald Trump announced on Twitter Wednesday that he has issued a full pardon for General Michael Flynn, who was charged with lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation during an interview where agents lied to Flynn about the nature of the investigation. Flynn’s subsequent legal persecution has been described as a political witch hunt perpetrated by officials loyal to the Barack Obama administration.
“It is my Great Honor to announce that General Michael T. Flynn has been granted a Full Pardon. Congratulations to @Gen Flynn and his wonderful family, I know you will now have a truly fantastic Thanksgiving!” Trump said in Wednesday’s tweet.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1331706255212228608
Earlier in 2020, the claims that Flynn was set up by the FBI were given credence by the Department of Justice, which dropped charges against Flynn.
Via National File:
The Justice Department has announced that it is dropping the case against Michael Flynn, President Trump’s ex-National Security advisor. In court documents that were filed on Thursday and obtained by the Associated Press, the Justice Department said the criminal case against Flynn was being dropped “after a considered review of all the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information.” Prosecutors at the Justice Department and the FBI had maintained that Flynn had lied in an interview to the FBI about conversations he had had with the Russian ambassador. However, the Justice Department now says that the interview by the FBI was “untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn” and that it was “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis.”
The news of Flynn’s pardon has, predictably, been met with cries of anguish and alarm by the anti-Trump corporate media.


nationalfile--2020-11-26--VIDEO: Ellis Says Pennsylvania Can ‘Take That Power Back’ From Corrupt Officials, Assign Electoral V

VIDEO: Ellis Says Pennsylvania Can ‘Take That Power Back’ From Corrupt Officials, Assign Electoral Votes To Trump

Sidney Powell released the Kraken in time for Thanksgiving dinner

Last Updated on November 25, 2020
During the Pennsylvania Senate’s hearing on election integrity, Trump lawyer Jenna Ellis argued that the legislature can take back the power of assigning electors.
The hearing on election integrity in Pennsylvania took place on Wednesday, with a number of witnesses giving evidence of severe and widespread voter fraud in favour of Joe Biden.
One posited solution to a potentially corrupt voting system, proposed by Ellis and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, is for the Pennsylvania legislature to select the electors for the Electoral College. This was first mentioned by Republican State Rep. Dawn Keefer, who noted that the Constitution gave the legislature that ability, but added that the legislature ceded the power to the Secretary of State by a statute, and they were advised by attorneys that it was therefore out of their control.
In response, Trump attorney Jenna Ellis explained that the Pennsylvania legislature can “take that power back at any time”:
When you have the delegation of authority, the legislature can take that back. You also have an instance here that the law was completely ignored, so even though you have a manner in which your electors are generally selected in Pennsylvania, and that’s worked for the past presidential elections since the statutes were authorised and gone through the legislature, this is an election that has been corrupted, so you can’t go through that method. Those laws were violated. The general assembly here, the legislature, is the authorised entity in the constitution that selects the manner. You can take that power back at any time.
VIDEO: Trump Makes Surprise Appearance in Gettysburg, The “World is Watching,” And “We Can’t Let Them Get Away With It”
Ellis argued that as the laws were ignored, and election officials “violated the manner in which you as the general assembly has proscribed in the law how you select your electors,” then state legislatures “have the constitutional authority to craft a remedy.”
“You can take that power back at any time, you don’t need a court to tell you that,” Ellis concluded. “This is your constitutional prerogrative. State legislature, in the context of Article II Section 1.2, means state legislature, period.”
LOL Dems panicking and saying this “wasn’t a real hearing.” Sorry, libs, Article II is very real. #Pennsylvaniahearing — Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) November 25, 2020
Rudy Giuliani, the head of the Trump legal team investigating the election integrity, pointed out that the power was delegated “to the very people whose conduct is in question,” such as the Pennsylvania Secretary of State, who illegally changed the ballot identification deadline at short notice:
You’re asking them to investigate themselves. Given the fact that this is your sole constitutional right and authority, you can always assume constitutional authority that you delegated back. You also have a rational basis for doing it… This was done, one might argue… deliberately by the governor, the elections commissioner, who issued absurd opinions telling people to violate the law, and then you’re going to ask them to make a decision on the election that allegedly they corrupted? It seems to me you have a perfect right to take that back and make that decision.
National File reported on Wednesday that the campaign account of Senator Doug Mastriano was banned from Twitter following the election integrity hearing.
VIDEO: Crowd Gasps at PA Hearing After Learning of 600K Vote Dump for Biden, Just 3K for Trump
https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1331665609898266626
During the hearing, Sen. Mastriano, who organized the hearing, slammed the election chaos, which he said was completely by design. “We move heaven and earth with American dollars to secure elections in Iraq and Afghanistan and elsewhere. We can’t do it in our own state?” Mastriano said. “There’s people in Pennsylvania not interested in safe, secure elections.”


nationalfile--2020-11-26--Ukrainian-Born Incoming Republican House Rep Warns ‘I Grew Up In Socialism’ And ‘It’s Not Pretty’

In a Thanksgiving Eve press release , the Warren County , Virginia Sheriff 's Office warned residents against holding holiday @

Last Updated on November 27, 2020
The fact that 70 percent of millennials say they would vote for a socialist and one in three view communism favorably, should concern people of every demographic in the nation. But that isn’t what’s happening, and one new member of the US Congress is sounding the alarm about our creeping relationship with Socialism.
US Representative-elect Victoria Spartz (R-IN), is taking a stand against the efforts of the Democrat Party in the United States to move the country toward Socialism. Spartz is one of 17 newly elected conservative women in the next Congress.
Spartz is a Ukrainian-born, naturalized, American citizen and one of the founding members of the new “Freedom Force.” This group was created by Spartz and colleagues Reps. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY), Maria Elvira Salazar’s (R-FL), and Carlos Gimenez (R-FL), and meant to counter the influence of “The Squad,” piloted by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).
“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz said in an interview. “I grew up in socialism…I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
“I can tell you what is going to be next,” she said. Spartz explained that under both Socialist and Communist systems, the government “forces us to be equal” and will use “suppression” to do it.
“I grew up in a socialistic country. I saw what happens when it runs out of money and it is not pretty. And now we’re building socialism. I can tell you what is going to be next. It’s very sad for me to see that.” @Victoria_Spartz https://t.co/CaV9qkoegK — Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) November 20, 2020
The suppression Spartz speaks of is becoming increasingly evident, and the ongoing battle to affect free and fair elections in the United States this General Election cycle is a perfect example.
American lawyer and political strategist, Yuri Vanetik, who shares Ukraine as a birthplace with Spartz, said in an interview with National File, “It is certainly alarming. I speak often with business elite and politicians in the Caucuses, Eastern Europe and Asia. They tell me that our elections are beginning to resemble theirs. This sentiment, regardless of its empirical veracity, presents a growing image problem for Americans.”
Indeed, some world leaders – who ironically including Russia’s President Vladimir Putin – are hesitant about recognizing the victor in the November 3, 2020, presidential race because of questions about the election’s legitimacy.
“This is not about Trump winning or losing or conceding,” Vanetik said. “It is about the integrity of our institutions and regardless of whether the voter fraud was as enormous as some allege, we need to worry about optics and the erosion in values and sanctity of the democratic process.”
Spartz’s echoed Vanetik’s mindset saying, “We have to value our freedoms because we’re the greatest Republic that ever existed,”
Vanetik provided a warning to the American public, “There are plenty of fake ‘democracies’ that claim to have elected officials and claim to have respect for human rights. Most of these dictatorships’ claims are what English philosopher, Jeremy Bentham, referred to as ‘nonsense on stilts.’”
“Ukraine, our ally and my birthplace, is a great example of a failed country and a failed democracy,” Vanetik continued. “Let Ukraine be a warning for us. Curbing voter fraud is not as important for determining who wins this current election, as it is a sign that our institutions may be failing. If we start doubting the integrity of our establishment and the rule of law, we descend into a society where values transcend, becoming not much better than a Hobbesian state of nature.”
“We should remember that the whole world is watching our elections,” he said.
“We have a group of new Republicans who love America. We value freedom, liberty, and opportunity.” Several GOP Reps.-elect whose families fled #Socialist countries are forming a “freedom force” to fight #Socialism countering the progressive “Squad.” https://t.co/Kf8mUlBjU9 — The Epoch Times (@EpochTimes) November 22, 2020
Spartz and her colleagues in the Freedom Force will be seated in the 117th Congress of the United States, a Congress that sees the dangerous writing on the wall that is our dalliance with Socialism.


nationalfile--2020-11-27--VIDEO: PA Sen. Mastriano Unveils Joint Resolution To Assign Electoral Votes In Legislature, Pave Way

VIDEO: PA Sen. Mastriano Unveils Joint Resolution To Assign Electoral Votes In Legislature, Pave Way For Trump Victory

In a move that mirrors state senate hearings that took place this week in Gettysburg , Pennsylvania , a ...

Last Updated on November 27, 2020
On episode 541 of Steve Bannon’s War Room, Senator Doug Mastriano announced that the Pennsylvania state legislature will move to draft a joint resolution to take back the power to appoint presidential electors in a maneuver that could potentially result in President Donald Trump being awarded Pennsylvania’s electoral votes.
Mastriano explained to Bannon that in 1938, the Pennsylvania General Assembly gave the authority to select delegates to the Electoral College to the Secretary of State. “Assuming the election is fair,” the delegates would “naturally go to that person.” He noted that if the election isn’t fair, the state would be handing the power to the “same party that cheated.”
Bannon, shocked to hear the news, interrupted the Senator, saying:
“Hold it, I think we have some breaking news here. You’re saying you’re going to get a joint resolution to actually go forward, and the Republicans control the House and the Senate, to go forward to basically take the power back from the Secretary of State and put it in the state legislature to put forward the electors?”
Mastriano responded: “That’s exactly what we are going to do.”
https://youtu.be/hXQ4kDgjDiU?t=5774
The Senator elaborated, noting that backlash will ensue and the Governor will ultimately disagree with the decision, including the Secretary of State, Kathy Boockvar, who Mastriano thinks should’ve resigned “months ago” and that she “should’ve never been confirmed.”
“There is so much evidence of shenanigans and fraud, and we can’t stand aside and just watch this unfold around us here. You know, it’s not about disenfranchising anybody, it’s making sure every legal vote counted and if there is extensive shenanigans out there, it’s up to the General Assembly to step in. So we have a fight in our hands, and we’re going to fight, we’re going to take that fight all the way to the Supreme Court if we have to.”
Mastriano tells Bannon that there are 50 “voices” in the Senate, with 29 of them being “Republican or independent caucuses with us.” He adds that “all we need, you know, are 16 in the Senate, really, to influence the leadership.” The Senator believes that Republicans in the state legislature are “getting motivated” and that “momentum” is building to move forward and do “the right thing.”
“We can’t certify an election result that appears to be corrupted” said Mastriano.
This move could be considered another huge win for the Trump Campaign as they continue to push Republicans in Pennsylvania, as well as other states, to act upon the evidence of widespread voter fraud.


nationalfile--2020-11-30--DoJ Lawyer: US Can Kill Its Own Citizens Without Review

In an argument before a US federal appeals court , the US Department of Justice ( DoJ ) argued the @

Last Updated on November 29, 2020
In an argument before a US federal appeals court, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) argued the United States government had the right to take an American citizen’s life – without judicial review – if state secrets would be exposed.
Bradley Hinshelwood, a DoJ attorney, argued before the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Monday that the United States can target its own citizens for killing without judicial review when litigation would expose state secrets.
The argument drew noticeable alarm among judges on the Circuit Court panel.
“Do you appreciate how extraordinary that proposition is?” US Circuit Judge Patricia Millett asked Hinshelwood, rephrasing his claim as giving the government the ability to “unilaterally decide to kill US citizens.”
The plaintiff, Bilal Abdul Kareem, a US citizen, works as a journalist in Syria for an obscure news channel. This news outlet provides access to Islamofascist rebel fighters. The jihadis Kareem interviews are linked to al Qaida.
Yes. THIS DOES IN FACT SEEM ALARMING. https://t.co/lmgRkEJYzb — Eric Garland (@ericgarland) November 16, 2020
Kareem claims that he is targeted, included on a “kill list,” that resulted in five military strikes against him that he believes were carried out by the US military. He claims his inclusion on the alleged “kill list” came about because of metadata from electronic devices.
The US government sought to dismiss the case, saying that the bulk of his complaint was held under the state secrets privilege. A federal judge agreed with the government.
In its appellate brief, it was argued that Kareem lacked standing to bring the case because he makes an unsubstantiated claim about being targeted in a war zone. Even if he had standing, Hinshelwood argued, the state secrets privilege supersedes the claim in his litigation.
Hinshelwood did acknowledge that considering a potential strike against US citizen is a serious undertaking and admitted the courts have a role in deciding whether the state secrets privilege is appropriately applied in the matter.


nationalfile--2020-11-29--REMOVED: Johns Hopkins Study Saying COVID Has ‘Relatively No Effect on Deaths’ Is Expunged

Last Updated on December 1, 2020
A study critical to the narrative that COVID-19 is a deadly virus with the same killing power as smallpox or plague was published by John Hopkins University but was then suddenly retracted leading to this question. Why?
NOTE: Facebook is flagging this story as false information and removing it from feeds. Professor Briand continues to stand by her research.
On November 22, 2020, the John Hopkins University Newsletter published a study directly challenging the common narrative that COVID-19 a global threat to the human race.
Genevieve Briand, the assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Johns Hopkins University, analyzed the impact that COVID-19 had on US deaths saying the full impact of the virus – as it relates to deaths in the United States – can be understood by comparing it to the number of total deaths in the country.
According to the study – and contrary to the narrative being trumpeted by political opportunists and alarmists across the country, “[I]n contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”
Utilizing data from the CDC website, Briand compiled a table demonstrating percentages of total deaths per age demographic from early February 2020 to early September 2020. This includes the date range from before COVID-19 was detected in the US to after infection rates “spiked.”
Remarkably, deaths among older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since the virus primarily affects the elderly, experts anticipated an uptick in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is absent in the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths across all age groups remains unchanged.
Here is a presentation by Genevieve Briand presenter of the paper that was reported on yesterday. Very important presention. https://t.co/oZjNqUa8yP — Jeffrey A Tucker (@jeffreyatucker) November 26, 2020
“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals,” Briand said, “is simply because every day in the US older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals.”
“Every year in the US when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes,” Briand said.
Perhaps more interesting is the gerrymandering Briand found in how the death statistics were reported.
When Briand examined the 2020 data in context with the seasonal fluctuations, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases, an unusual finding because heart disease always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths.
When a closer examination of the CD data was performed, Briand noticed something disturbing and unnatural.
Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during seasonal periods in 2020 to 2018, and in doing so noticed that instead of the usual drastic increase across all causes, there was a substantial decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more alarming was that this sudden drop in deaths is observed for all other causes.
“This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years…the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19,” the study reads.
Briand’s conclusion? The COVID-19 death toll in the United States is deceptive and that deaths from other diseases are being categorized as COVID-19 deaths.
When Marvis Gutierrez and Ariella Shua, the managing editors of the JHU newsletter, were asked about the study’s removal from the publication their excuse presented as unbelievable and shocking.
“The article in question was retracted last night, as it was being used to spread misinformation about the pandemic…We were not censored, but decided to retract the article.
The article “A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19,” published in the Science & Technology section on Nov. 22, has been deleted. — JHU News-Letter (@JHUNewsLetter) November 26, 2020
Professor Briand stands by her research and conclusion.