truthout--2020-11-18--Hunger Strikers Caged in the Second Wave Are “Just Trying to Survive the Winter”

“ Our society created the framework for this atrocity just like the trenches of World War I created perfect incubation zones for the 1918 flu , ” Truthout ’ s Kelly Hayes talks with Eric , an organizer with Oakland Abolition and Solidarity about the escalating COVID-19 outbreak at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility , where some imprisoned people have launched a hunger strike over unsafe , unlivable conditions .
Note : This a rush transcript and has been lightly edited for clarity .
Copy may not be in its final form .
Kelly Hayes : Welcome to “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about things you should know if you want to change the world .
I ’ m your host , Kelly Hayes .
By the end of the year , COVID-19 will be the third leading cause of death in the United States .
In the wake of Trump ’ s defeat at the ballot box , people in the U.S. are grappling with the second wave of COVID-19 , or in some cases , ignoring the problem and contributing to the spread .
Some of us are lucky enough to work at home @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up , sanitize and do their best to navigate the viral gauntlet .
But tragically , some people in the U.S. are not allowed to take even the most minimal precautions to protect themselves from a virus that has already killed more than a million people .
The plight of imprisoned people during the pandemic is not a popular discussion right now , but it is an essential one , which is why we will be devoting this episode , and some upcoming episodes , to the COVID-19 crisis in jails , prisons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we can do about it .
For those of us who are careful , who don ’ t leave home without a mask and a face shield , who use hand sanitizer every time we touch a surface outside , or who maybe even get our groceries delivered , it might be tough to imagine being trapped in a building where the virus is rampant , trying not to touch anything , knowing you don ’ t have hand sanitizer or soap .
Now , imagine that the building is packed full of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are sick , and you don ’ t have a mask .
You can ’ t leave , or even decide where you ’ re going to stand or rest .
The rooms are small and the hallways are narrow , and there is no way to keep your distance .
The building is poorly ventilated and there ’ s black mold all over on the walls , so the longer you ’ re there , the more you ’ re hurting your lungs , making yourself more susceptible to the virus .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s dirty , and you know the virus is hanging in the air and on surfaces throughout the building .
People are getting sick .
You can see them , you can hear them , but you can ’ t help them and you can ’ t leave .
That ’ s what life is like for people living in jails , detention centers and prisons during this pandemic .
I know a lot of you turn away from discussion of what ’ s happening in prisons even in the best of times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away and to forget .
We have also been conditioned to see ourselves as being different from imprisoned people .
I have frequently heard people say , for example , that they don ’ t approve of the conditions or approve of the practices in U.S. prisons , but that the thing to do is not wind up there .
“ I wouldn ’ t do something to wind up in prison , ” is something I have heard from people many times .
So before we dive into today ’ s discussion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility in Corcoran , California , I want to say a few words about how we relate to the people inside .
I have no trouble relating to people inside prisons , but I know that ’ s not everyone .
I don ’ t have any illusions that I am any better than people ensnared by the system .
I have broken the law many times over the years , and not always for the sake of justice .
I spent the better part of my 20 ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I was in and out of institutions , and I broke many , many laws .
Eventually , I got the right diagnosis and the right medication and things started to change in a big way , but for nearly a decade , there were countless occasions on which I could have been sent to prison for the things I was doing , even though I was mostly only hurting myself .
In my 30 ’ s , which are now coming to a close , I have taken a lot of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I believe in , and I have been very aware of my proximity to incarceration during that time as well .
I don ’ t really see a moral distinction between those different versions of me winding up dead in a cage , but I know the world does .
I also know that people tend to exceptionalize activists , as though our criminalization is different , and we ’ re somehow better than other people who face charges .
I believe , for example , that if I staged an act of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a lot of people would advocate for me .
There would be a # FreeKelly campaign on Twitter , and I am not getting down on that , because I am extremely grateful and please do get me out if they ever come for me — seriously , I will be counting on you all .
But please also understand that the Kelly in her mid-20s , who could not function in the world , who could not stop hurting herself , who experienced homelessness , who couldn ’ t hold down a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hard to deal with — there would have been no campaign to free her , and she deserved to live too .
One of my primary struggles during that time was an addiction to heroin .
But after getting the right psych meds , it was infinitely easier for me to avoid hard drugs , so I was able to begin the process of rebuilding my life , and twelve years later , here I am , talking to you .
But that very lucky turn of events isn ’ t how most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , for example , did not get her happy ending .
Keeley was the beloved sister of one of my best friends , Maya Schenwar .
Keeley was a vibrant , passionate person and she was brave .
The stories Maya told me about Keeley when she was in prison and rehab , sticking up for other people who were being bullied or abused , or smuggling an injured animal into the facility to care for it , I felt like I knew her .
And when we finally met , and I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s eyes when she was able to put her arm around her sister at a party , in the free world , I thought I was seeing another story like mine — someone who had been kicked around by this world , but who was going to make it .
I was so happy for my friend , and happy for Keeley .
But it didn ’ t end that way .
Keeley ’ s memorial service was the last social event I attended before the pandemic .
I watched my friend weep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ love of animals , her kindness , and how brave she was in defending others .
Keeley kept trying to get well , but she had been locked up so many times and endured so much violence , from the state , from people and also from the medical system .
There ’ s a lot of confusion in this country about treatment and care , as they relate to punishment and drug use , and this is especially important now as the Biden administration approaches .
One thing Keeley and I agreed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the U.S. is usually just another form of incarceration .
The conflation of punishment with treatment has led to a culture of violence against people criminalized for mental illness and addiction , and that culture manifests itself in many ways .
It turns hospitals into prisons , and it sometimes conjures notions of “ care ” around torture facilities that don ’ t even attempt treatments of any kind .
The California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility in Corcoran California is one such place .
There is no treatment at Corcoran , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ called .
It is a brutal prison , through and through .
There is also no meaningful activity of any kind for imprisoned people .
There are no masks , there is black mold everywhere , there is no way for prisoners to physically distance themselves and COVID-19 is rampant .
We have so much to reckon with in this country , and even those who are inclined to embrace those reckonings may struggle to do so now , with COVID-19 beating down our doors .
But we can not abandon the people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the framework for this atrocity just like the trenches of World War I created perfect incubation zones for the 1918 flu .
Our society has built a system of millions of cages , where conditions were already so bad that years were being stripped years off of people ’ s lives , and we have shuffled people through that system .
The United States created a system of disposal that ’ s now part of a perfect storm .
Because while it may feel as though prisons exist in some state of separation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do not .
Guards are vectors , and they very effectively redistribute the disease in our communities .
COVID-19 is being manufactured on a grand scale inside jails , prisons and detention centers .
In the case of jails , people are being cycled in and out of their communities , causing further spread , but in all facilities , you have guards who are bringing the disease back to their neighbors and communities .
In many cases , they are the only vectors .
There are countries that have emptied out entire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t do that because they discovered Mariame Kaba ’ s work and became prison abolitionists .
They did it because they knew they could not afford to create manufacturing centers for the disease .
So these are just some things I want to ask you to think about as we hear from today ’ s guest , Eric , who is an organizer with Oakland Abolition and Solidarity .
Because I know that a lot of you skip over stories about what ’ s happening in prisons , and you may even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happening inside , but I am asking you not to do that this time .
I am asking you to empathize , and if you have trouble imagining yourself in their shoes , or relating to what they ’ re going through , think about me .
Think about Keeley .
And ask yourself what must be done , for the sake of the people locked in those cages , and for the sake of your own humanity .
KH : Today ’ s guest is Eric , who is an organizer with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ California .
Oakland Abolition and Solidarity has been providing long term support for people trapped inside the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility , which is the largest prison facility in the state of California .
Eric , what can you tell us about what ’ s happening at the prison ?
Eric : Cases at CSATF have been hovering around 500 positive cases for about three weeks .
And we know that this is likely a kind of understatement of the crisis for two reasons .
Basically one is that [ California Department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cases to the quote “ resolved ” category after two weeks without retesting people .
And the second reason is the rate of false negatives that we know about , even in testing on the outside .
The yard in which the outbreak began , D Yard , there are two people on hunger strike , and today will be day 17 of that hunger strike .
Toward the beginning of the outbreak , they were very fed up and shocked by the handling of the crisis by the institution .
And they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Whenever I talk to people experiencing a particular crisis in a prison , whether it ’ s a natural disaster or an outbreak of disease , I pretty much always hear that conditions were already very bad , and even potentially deadly , prior to whatever disaster unfolded .
Can you tell us a bit about what people in CSATF were already up against ?
E : Absolutely .
Yeah .
So there ’ s kind of two answers to that one being like the , before COVID “ normal , ” before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I mean , going back several years , there has been unresolved leaks , across this facility , and that ’ s something that Oakland Abolition and Solidarity has been tracking for a long time , as well as people ’ s various attempts to address that situation through grievances and legal means .
So tons of leaking across the facility , the hunger strikers are now housed , they were moved recently .
They ’ re now housed in a leaky facility , and those leaky facilities almost always precipitate black @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kind of before COVID situation .
After COVID , and I ’ ll get to this when I talk about their second demand , a little more , but basically prisons respond to crises by taking stuff away like that is .
That is always their go-to solution and often their only solution .
So despite the fact that guards are sort of constantly bringing COVID-19 in and out .
In fact , in California , they ’ re like the sort of only possible vector , since visiting has been , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ beginning of the pandemic .
And across various facilities , people like people have across the system lost access to programming , classes , anything like anything that the state will call rehabilitation , is basically gone down to bare minimum quality of life resources , which after this outbreak started in CSATF , had been curtailed even further .
KH : People talk about comorbidities and how you are more likely to die of COVID-19 if you have diabetes or various disabilities .
We know there are many , many disabled and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the conditions you are describing really create their own potentially fatal vulnerabilities .
E : Yeah , absolutely .
You know , before the outbreak , I mean prison in general , but the black mold specifically has basically rendered people immunocompromised across the facility in ways that are likely undiagnosed .
KH : So how are the people who are on hunger strike holding up ?
E : Psychologically , remarkably well , sort of maintaining a lot of energy , a lot of regular communication and a lot of .
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like , they ’ re feeling the fight in , in a big way .
Physically their health is taking a toll they ’ ve each , at least two of the three have developed a skin condition all over their body , which they attribute more to the poor air in the facility and to the lack of access to showers more than they do to the hunger strike itself .
But you know , no doubt , that kind of a toll on the body isn ’ t helpful .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taking a toll on their immune system .
Which is especially scary considering that outbreak .
KH : So we know that a number of groups that are advocating for imprisoned people right now are making demands , and we will have links to some of that work in the show notes of this episode on our website , but I want to ask : what are the specific demands that the prisoners on hunger strike at CSATF are making ?
E : The prisoners who were on hunger strike have made three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kind of one , one like big statement , which I ’ ll get to at the end , but these demands are also a helpful lens into what people across the facility are experiencing .
So the first demanded universal and voluntary testing .
So the institution has , since about the time of the beginning of the hunger strike , about 80 percent of the facility has been tested , but there are two issues with this .
One is that people are often not given their own results until up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two , very often tests are carried out very forcefully and violently , and without the kind of attention to consent that we would associate with like normal , regular medical professionalism .
So this has led people across the facility to be sort of reticent to get tested and wary of being forced into circumstances where they ’ re tested and it ’ s in this sort of severely uncomfortable way .
So this is why it ’ s like universal access to voluntary testing and not just universal testing , cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dehumanize people who it ’ s meant to be treating medically .
Another reason this is important is because it ’ s like that having the information about one ’ s own status allows people to make actual decisions about their safety , about their distancing practices , about the ways that they engage with other people .
The institution has been moving people a lot , around the facility in really , really inexplicable ways and ways that have demonstrably put people at risk and exposed new people to the virus .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ about their own status in order to make those decisions for themselves , or at least to know what their risk level and risk factors are .
KH : I have heard a lot of reports about that kind of moving around of prisoners you describe .
Alan Mills , who ’ s with the Uptown People ’ s Law Center told a story on the show in April about how a prisoner in Stateville prison here in Illinois contracted COVID-19 , and then somehow frustrated the staff while being quarantined , so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which led to everyone who was in solitary at that time contracting the virus .
Like , this was an entirely predictable outcome and an undeniable act of violence .
E : Yeah , and so people have no control and often no knowledge of things like that happening .
KH : So what was the second demand that the hunger strikers are making ?
E : So demand number two is to restore safe programming .
Like we call programming basically anything that happens in prison that ’ s relatively positive .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a cell , so classes , rehabilitative activities , quote unquote “ sports , ” these are things that people have not had access to for a long time , but the sort of issue is beyond that .
Like the first step towards safe programming is the restoration of like bare minimum quality of life stuff , like telephone calls with loved ones , regular access to showers and regular access to commissary stores and packages .
And the stores and packages are survival necessities specifically because the food situation at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ getting like tiny silver dollar pancakes and a radish for breakfast , a few crackers and some cheese for lunch , and a boiled potato for dinner .
That ’ s like one little snapshot of a day ’ s worth of food at CSATF .
So people have to , like for survival , supplement their diets with quarterly packages that they can get from families and supporters on the outside , and commissary , neither of which they have had access to for at least a month now .
KH : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who have not been incarcerated , or had a loved one incarcerated , understand the importance of commissary access .
Prisons do not give people what they need to stay nourished , they do not give people what they need to stay warm — to even get a tiny fraction of their needs met , prisoners need commissary funds and access .
E : It is so unacceptable and , even when , oh , cleaning supplies , that ’ s the other thing .
That ’ s one thing that after the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ started to apply some pressure on the outside with phone zaps , we did see some return of access to cleaning supplies .
Albeit like really watered down and really sporadic .
But that ’ s another part of their demand that they have basically .
And that ’ s , again , it goes back to like health autonomy , and like the ability of people to like keep themselves safe .
The third demand is mechanisms for transparency .
So we ’ ve talked already about people needing to be informed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testing is happening .
CDCR also needs to also be in regular communication with people inside and their families about what is going on about why , like , why these movements are happening .
Like we know that we know that early last week , several people with positive cases were moved into F yard .
And they were there for about four hours and then moved out with the officials claiming that it was a mistake for them to have been there .
But now there ’ s a huge outbreak @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know people whose loved ones now are positive for COVID .
So no there ’ s been no accountability and no communication with people on the outside about what ’ s happening .
So CDCR needs to explain these movements .
And explain its overall plan for restoring better conditions and getting the outbreak under control .
And we think that video visiting is a good way to create some actual transparency and visibility to what ’ s happening inside .
It ’ s not likely that it ’ s safe to restore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s an ultimate goal , video visiting will allow people to sort of safely communicate with their loved ones and report what ’ s happening .
KH : I think so many of us are in a constant state of anxiety .
We have our masks , our hand sanitizer , our face shields , we get things delivered when we can , and we are avoiding other people like the plague because we think they might actually have the plague .
What do you think those of us who are really caught @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need to understand about how people in prison are experiencing this moment ?
E : I think that it ’ s difficult to imagine how much being in prison can or does ratchet up the kind of paranoia that we ’ re just getting used to on the outside about the surfaces that we touch , about sanitizing our hands , about the people that we come in contact with .
Imagine having no control .
Imagine having no ability to be more than six feet away from someone , or no ability @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the sort of status of people that you ’ re exposed to on a daily basis .
And this , in addition to all the other background conditions that we ’ ve described , so basically to know that you ’ re in this situation where COVID-19 is everywhere and have zero empowerment to do anything about it and to constantly held in that kind of precarity .
KH : I don ’ t think most people understand that submersion , that total evacuation of autonomy , and what that means when your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state of deterioration .
E : Yeah , absolutely .
And it is like , COVID-19 is just another kind of node in this systemic just the , the way that people ’ s autonomy is like absolutely violated and consistently violated by prison , like COVID-19 is just another aspect of that — like a new way for institutions to keep people scared disempowered and in danger .
KH : So there ’ s a new administration around the corner , and a lot of us are hopeful that we will finally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the federal government .
But unfortunately , the mass expansion of the prison industrial complex and the torturous conditions of the system were not invented by the Trump administration .
The nightmarish system that created a perfect framework for incubating this disease has been a bipartisan project , and Biden and Harris have both been extreme purveyors of carceral violence .
While I believe I will have a better chance of not dying of COVID-19 under a Biden administration , I am not sure how quickly anything will change for people inside the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will .
Is there any real discussion among the prisoners about whether Trump ’ s exit will change anything for them , or are folks just kind of trying to survive the winter ?
E : That ’ s a really good question .
I think in a lot of ways people are just trying to survive the winter .
I think the biggest danger of moving into a Biden administration is that people will be less apt to pay attention to things like this .
And I think like there ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of improvement .
And I think like what new restrictions and safety measures we see on the outside , like it takes people looking really hard and creating accountability just to make sure they happen at all on the inside .
And I think one of the talking points that the hunger strikers have been emphasizing is that if this were any other kind of situation where human beings were in danger , these facilities would be evacuated , would be like absolutely emptied out .
Because they ’ re incubators of COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic that we ’ re supposedly contending with and supposedly trying to get rid of prisons , our prisons are amplifying that virus .
So the call is to free them all and to evacuate these places .
But yeah , there ’ s that , that often feels a long way off .
KH : It really can .
But here , in this moment , I feel like we still have a lot of decisions to make , and that in each of those decisions , there is potential .
Like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this entire podcast , even though this is a tough subject that they could easily sort of divide from themselves and dismiss .
That ’ s a decision , and that decision might make something else possible , like them looking up y ’ alls website or checking out the show notes for ways to get involved , or even just reading up more on the subject .
We all have so many choices to make that can lead us places , and that can lead us to people , people who share @ @ @ @ @ @ @ value — one that ’ s enough to galvanize us .
Because whatever else we all like or don ’ t like about each other , we are all locked in a battle over what life and death mean .
And I think there are so many ways to show up for that fight , and advocating for the people this system is telling you to forget , is a really essential way to do that .
Things are going to get worse before they get better , and we know that , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
When people work together to survive a crisis , and to keep other people alive during a crisis , it can strengthen their bonds , and their determination and their values .
That could happen .
Or we could become more insular , more detached from each other ’ s fates , and we could wind up setting up the lowest bar imaginable , because Trump , as a point of comparison , makes it very easy to do that .
My feeling , in this moment , is that our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ things we make and share and build in this moment , will help drive those outcomes .
We could come through this winter valuing life more , and valuing each other more , and making bigger demands than ever .
We could , as my young friend Bresha Meadows says , “ care more and more about what happens to people over time , not less and less.
” I really think the way that we handle this crisis is going to dictate so much that comes after .
So I am so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doing , Eric , to support imprisoned people who are fighting for themselves right now .
And really for all of us , because that ’ s a fight for all of our humanity .
E : Yeah , absolutely .
And thank you so much for saying that .
Yeah , I think , you know where the hope is , is in that notion of collective survival .
And like , and we have to , like if we ’ re going to get through this and like you say , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through this with our humanity , I mean , we have to see people inside as , as us because they are us , and that ’ s something that so many people are sort of inculturated against .
The dividing line between inside and out in this , is this well-maintained political force that , that keeps us from having this kind of solidarity or sense of collective survival .
And , and I ’ m glad to see that there could be hope of breaking that down .
And I appreciate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ putting , putting this under the , under the magnifying glass .
KH : Well , if you all want to learn more about this struggle and what you can do to support , we are going to have some materials to check out on our website , so please do get involved , in whatever way that you can , and please remember that the crisis we are talking about today is just one of many , and that there is probably a similar crisis playing out at a facility near you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Eric , who are already working on it , whose efforts you can join .
If not , there are a lot of tools and resources out there to learn from , in terms of how to support people who are trying to survive inside of jails , prisons and detention centers and we will hook you up with as much as we can in the show notes .
Eric , I want to thank you so much for joining us today .
E : Thank you so much for having me .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s been a real pleasure and an honor .
KH : And I want to say to anyone imprisoned in the path of this disease , if you can hear or ready this : we haven ’ t given up , and we won ’ t .
I also want to thank our listeners for joining us today , and remember , our best defense against cynicism is to do good , and to remember , that the good we do matters .
Until next time , I ’ ll see you in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ call or send an email ?
Organizers with the Chicago Community Bond Fund are calling on the Cook County State ’ s Attorney and Chief Judge to take bold action to reduce the number of people incarcerated in Cook County Jail .
Current incarceration rates and practices at the facility are putting thousands of people at risk , both in and outside the facility .
You can find call-in and email scripts here .
Want to demand the release of people in ICE custody ?
Detention Watch Network ’ s # FreeThemAll : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Release of People in ICE Custody is a “ working toolkit to help guide and support the work of organizations and individuals looking to demand the release of people in ICE custody.
” Want to take action ?
The American Friends Services Committee will be hosting a week of action to # FreeThemAll from December 10 through December 18 with events and actions for people to plug into across the country .
Resources will also be available for people who would like to organize their action .
You can learn more here .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ & Solidarity ?
You can read more about their work here .
Report Finds Over 100 Rebellions in Jails and Prisons Over COVID Conditions Locked Down , Locked Out : Why Prison Doesn ’ t Work and How We Can Do Better by Maya Schenwar Prison by Any Other Name : The Harmful Consequences of Popular Reforms by Maya Schenwar and Victoria Law

Human rights activists prepare for a car caravan protest through downtown Los Angeles, California, to call on officials to release prisoners from jails to prevent the spread of coronavirus on April 7, 2020. ROBYN BECK / AFP via Getty Images
Part of the Series Movement Memos
“Our society created the framework for this atrocity just like the trenches of World War I created perfect incubation zones for the 1918 flu,” Truthout’s Kelly Hayes talks with Eric, an organizer with Oakland Abolition and Solidarity about the escalating COVID-19 outbreak at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, where some imprisoned people have launched a hunger strike over unsafe, unlivable conditions.
TRANSCRIPT
Note: This a rush transcript and has been lightly edited for clarity. Copy may not be in its final form.
Kelly Hayes: Welcome to “Movement Memos,” a Truthout podcast about things you should know if you want to change the world. I’m your host, Kelly Hayes. By the end of the year, COVID-19 will be the third leading cause of death in the United States. In the wake of Trump’s defeat at the ballot box, people in the U.S. are grappling with the second wave of COVID-19, or in some cases, ignoring the problem and contributing to the spread. Some of us are lucky enough to work at home, while others are forced to mask up, sanitize and do their best to navigate the viral gauntlet. But tragically, some people in the U.S. are not allowed to take even the most minimal precautions to protect themselves from a virus that has already killed more than a million people. The plight of imprisoned people during the pandemic is not a popular discussion right now, but it is an essential one, which is why we will be devoting this episode, and some upcoming episodes, to the COVID-19 crisis in jails, prisons and immigration detention centers, and what we can do about it.
For those of us who are careful, who don’t leave home without a mask and a face shield, who use hand sanitizer every time we touch a surface outside, or who maybe even get our groceries delivered, it might be tough to imagine being trapped in a building where the virus is rampant, trying not to touch anything, knowing you don’t have hand sanitizer or soap. Now, imagine that the building is packed full of people, and a lot of them are sick, and you don’t have a mask. You can’t leave, or even decide where you’re going to stand or rest. The rooms are small and the hallways are narrow, and there is no way to keep your distance. The building is poorly ventilated and there’s black mold all over on the walls, so the longer you’re there, the more you’re hurting your lungs, making yourself more susceptible to the virus. It’s dark, it’s dirty, and you know the virus is hanging in the air and on surfaces throughout the building. People are getting sick. You can see them, you can hear them, but you can’t help them and you can’t leave.
That’s what life is like for people living in jails, detention centers and prisons during this pandemic.
I know a lot of you turn away from discussion of what’s happening in prisons even in the best of times. We have been conditioned to look away and to forget. We have also been conditioned to see ourselves as being different from imprisoned people. I have frequently heard people say, for example, that they don’t approve of the conditions or approve of the practices in U.S. prisons, but that the thing to do is not wind up there. “I wouldn’t do something to wind up in prison,” is something I have heard from people many times. So before we dive into today’s discussion of what’s happening in the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility in Corcoran, California, I want to say a few words about how we relate to the people inside.
I have no trouble relating to people inside prisons, but I know that’s not everyone. I don’t have any illusions that I am any better than people ensnared by the system. I have broken the law many times over the years, and not always for the sake of justice. I spent the better part of my 20’s grappling with a misdiagnosed mental illness, I was in and out of institutions, and I broke many, many laws. Eventually, I got the right diagnosis and the right medication and things started to change in a big way, but for nearly a decade, there were countless occasions on which I could have been sent to prison for the things I was doing, even though I was mostly only hurting myself. In my 30’s, which are now coming to a close, I have taken a lot of legal risks for the sake of causes I believe in, and I have been very aware of my proximity to incarceration during that time as well. I don’t really see a moral distinction between those different versions of me winding up dead in a cage, but I know the world does. I also know that people tend to exceptionalize activists, as though our criminalization is different, and we’re somehow better than other people who face charges. I believe, for example, that if I staged an act of protest today and went to prison, a lot of people would advocate for me. There would be a #FreeKelly campaign on Twitter, and I am not getting down on that, because I am extremely grateful and please do get me out if they ever come for me — seriously, I will be counting on you all. But please also understand that the Kelly in her mid-20s, who could not function in the world, who could not stop hurting herself, who experienced homelessness, who couldn’t hold down a job, whose mental illness made her hard to deal with — there would have been no campaign to free her, and she deserved to live too. One of my primary struggles during that time was an addiction to heroin. But after getting the right psych meds, it was infinitely easier for me to avoid hard drugs, so I was able to begin the process of rebuilding my life, and twelve years later, here I am, talking to you.
But that very lucky turn of events isn’t how most stories like mine end. Keeley Schenwar, for example, did not get her happy ending. Keeley was the beloved sister of one of my best friends, Maya Schenwar. Keeley was a vibrant, passionate person and she was brave. The stories Maya told me about Keeley when she was in prison and rehab, sticking up for other people who were being bullied or abused, or smuggling an injured animal into the facility to care for it, I felt like I knew her. And when we finally met, and I saw the joy in my friend’s eyes when she was able to put her arm around her sister at a party, in the free world, I thought I was seeing another story like mine — someone who had been kicked around by this world, but who was going to make it. I was so happy for my friend, and happy for Keeley. But it didn’t end that way.
Keeley’s memorial service was the last social event I attended before the pandemic. I watched my friend weep as she talked about Keeley’s love of animals, her kindness, and how brave she was in defending others. Keeley kept trying to get well, but she had been locked up so many times and endured so much violence, from the state, from people and also from the medical system.
There’s a lot of confusion in this country about treatment and care, as they relate to punishment and drug use, and this is especially important now as the Biden administration approaches. One thing Keeley and I agreed on was that what passes for treatment in the U.S. is usually just another form of incarceration. The conflation of punishment with treatment has led to a culture of violence against people criminalized for mental illness and addiction, and that culture manifests itself in many ways. It turns hospitals into prisons, and it sometimes conjures notions of “care” around torture facilities that don’t even attempt treatments of any kind. The California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility in Corcoran California is one such place. There is no treatment at Corcoran, or CSATF, as it’s often called. It is a brutal prison, through and through. There is also no meaningful activity of any kind for imprisoned people. There are no masks, there is black mold everywhere, there is no way for prisoners to physically distance themselves and COVID-19 is rampant.
We have so much to reckon with in this country, and even those who are inclined to embrace those reckonings may struggle to do so now, with COVID-19 beating down our doors. But we cannot abandon the people in those buildings. Our society created the framework for this atrocity just like the trenches of World War I created perfect incubation zones for the 1918 flu. Our society has built a system of millions of cages, where conditions were already so bad that years were being stripped years off of people’s lives, and we have shuffled people through that system. The United States created a system of disposal that’s now part of a perfect storm. Because while it may feel as though prisons exist in some state of separation from the rest of society, they do not. Guards are vectors, and they very effectively redistribute the disease in our communities. COVID-19 is being manufactured on a grand scale inside jails, prisons and detention centers. In the case of jails, people are being cycled in and out of their communities, causing further spread, but in all facilities, you have guards who are bringing the disease back to their neighbors and communities. In many cases, they are the only vectors.
There are countries that have emptied out entire prisons during this crisis. They didn’t do that because they discovered Mariame Kaba’s work and became prison abolitionists. They did it because they knew they could not afford to create manufacturing centers for the disease.
So these are just some things I want to ask you to think about as we hear from today’s guest, Eric, who is an organizer with Oakland Abolition and Solidarity. Because I know that a lot of you skip over stories about what’s happening in prisons, and you may even distance yourself emotionally from what’s happening inside, but I am asking you not to do that this time. I am asking you to empathize, and if you have trouble imagining yourself in their shoes, or relating to what they’re going through, think about me. Think about Keeley. And ask yourself what must be done, for the sake of the people locked in those cages, and for the sake of your own humanity.
[Musical interlude]
KH: Today’s guest is Eric, who is an organizer with Oakland Abolition and Solidarity in Oakland, California. Oakland Abolition and Solidarity has been providing long term support for people trapped inside the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, which is the largest prison facility in the state of California. Eric, what can you tell us about what’s happening at the prison?
Eric: Cases at CSATF have been hovering around 500 positive cases for about three weeks. And we know that this is likely a kind of understatement of the crisis for two reasons. Basically one is that [California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation] CDCR moves cases to the quote “resolved” category after two weeks without retesting people. And the second reason is the rate of false negatives that we know about, even in testing on the outside. The yard in which the outbreak began, D Yard, there are two people on hunger strike, and today will be day 17 of that hunger strike. Toward the beginning of the outbreak, they were very fed up and shocked by the handling of the crisis by the institution. And they decided to take action.
KH: Whenever I talk to people experiencing a particular crisis in a prison, whether it’s a natural disaster or an outbreak of disease, I pretty much always hear that conditions were already very bad, and even potentially deadly, prior to whatever disaster unfolded. Can you tell us a bit about what people in CSATF were already up against?
E: Absolutely. Yeah. So there’s kind of two answers to that one being like the, before COVID “normal,” before this current outbreak. So before COVID, I mean, going back several years, there has been unresolved leaks, across this facility, and that’s something that Oakland Abolition and Solidarity has been tracking for a long time, as well as people’s various attempts to address that situation through grievances and legal means.
So tons of leaking across the facility, the hunger strikers are now housed, they were moved recently. They’re now housed in a leaky facility, and those leaky facilities almost always precipitate black mold. So that’s the kind of before COVID situation. After COVID, and I’ll get to this when I talk about their second demand, a little more, but basically prisons respond to crises by taking stuff away like that is. That is always their go-to solution and often their only solution. So despite the fact that guards are sort of constantly bringing COVID-19 in and out. In fact, in California, they’re like the sort of only possible vector, since visiting has been, there has been no visiting since the very beginning of the pandemic. And across various facilities, people like people have across the system lost access to programming, classes, anything like anything that the state will call rehabilitation, is basically gone down to bare minimum quality of life resources, which after this outbreak started in CSATF, had been curtailed even further.
KH: People talk about comorbidities and how you are more likely to die of COVID-19 if you have diabetes or various disabilities. We know there are many, many disabled and chronically ill people in prison, but the conditions you are describing really create their own potentially fatal vulnerabilities.
E: Yeah, absolutely. You know, before the outbreak, I mean prison in general, but the black mold specifically has basically rendered people immunocompromised across the facility in ways that are likely undiagnosed.
KH: So how are the people who are on hunger strike holding up?
E: Psychologically, remarkably well, sort of maintaining a lot of energy, a lot of regular communication and a lot of. A lot of spirit, a lot of like, they’re feeling the fight in, in a big way. Physically their health is taking a toll they’ve each, at least two of the three have developed a skin condition all over their body, which they attribute more to the poor air in the facility and to the lack of access to showers more than they do to the hunger strike itself. But you know, no doubt, that kind of a toll on the body isn’t helpful. And we know that not eating is likely taking a toll on their immune system. Which is especially scary considering that outbreak.
KH: So we know that a number of groups that are advocating for imprisoned people right now are making demands, and we will have links to some of that work in the show notes of this episode on our website, but I want to ask: what are the specific demands that the prisoners on hunger strike at CSATF are making?
E: The prisoners who were on hunger strike have made three demands of the facility, and then kind of one, one like big statement, which I’ll get to at the end, but these demands are also a helpful lens into what people across the facility are experiencing. So the first demanded universal and voluntary testing. So the institution has, since about the time of the beginning of the hunger strike, about 80 percent of the facility has been tested, but there are two issues with this. One is that people are often not given their own results until up to a week after testing. And two, very often tests are carried out very forcefully and violently, and without the kind of attention to consent that we would associate with like normal, regular medical professionalism. So this has led people across the facility to be sort of reticent to get tested and wary of being forced into circumstances where they’re tested and it’s in this sort of severely uncomfortable way. So this is why it’s like universal access to voluntary testing and not just universal testing, cause we know how these facilities treat or dehumanize people who it’s meant to be treating medically. Another reason this is important is because it’s like that having the information about one’s own status allows people to make actual decisions about their safety, about their distancing practices, about the ways that they engage with other people. The institution has been moving people a lot, around the facility in really, really inexplicable ways and ways that have demonstrably put people at risk and exposed new people to the virus. So people just having the basic knowledge about their own status in order to make those decisions for themselves, or at least to know what their risk level and risk factors are.
So yeah, pretty, pretty bare minimum.
KH: I have heard a lot of reports about that kind of moving around of prisoners you describe. Alan Mills, who’s with the Uptown People’s Law Center told a story on the show in April about how a prisoner in Stateville prison here in Illinois contracted COVID-19, and then somehow frustrated the staff while being quarantined, so they just put him in solitary, which led to everyone who was in solitary at that time contracting the virus. Like, this was an entirely predictable outcome and an undeniable act of violence.
E: Yeah, and so people have no control and often no knowledge of things like that happening.
KH: So what was the second demand that the hunger strikers are making?
E: So demand number two is to restore safe programming. Like we call programming basically anything that happens in prison that’s relatively positive. That’s like not sitting alone in a cell, so classes, rehabilitative activities, quote unquote “sports,” these are things that people have not had access to for a long time, but the sort of issue is beyond that. Like the first step towards safe programming is the restoration of like bare minimum quality of life stuff, like telephone calls with loved ones, regular access to showers and regular access to commissary stores and packages. And the stores and packages are survival necessities specifically because the food situation at CSATF is absolutely egregious. People are getting like tiny silver dollar pancakes and a radish for breakfast, a few crackers and some cheese for lunch, and a boiled potato for dinner. That’s like one little snapshot of a day’s worth of food at CSATF. So people have to, like for survival, supplement their diets with quarterly packages that they can get from families and supporters on the outside, and commissary, neither of which they have had access to for at least a month now.
KH: I don’t think most people who have not been incarcerated, or had a loved one incarcerated, understand the importance of commissary access. Prisons do not give people what they need to stay nourished, they do not give people what they need to stay warm — to even get a tiny fraction of their needs met, prisoners need commissary funds and access.
E: It is so unacceptable and, even when, oh, cleaning supplies, that’s the other thing. That’s one thing that after the hunger strikes started, and after we started to apply some pressure on the outside with phone zaps, we did see some return of access to cleaning supplies. Albeit like really watered down and really sporadic. But that’s another part of their demand that they have basically. And that’s, again, it goes back to like health autonomy, and like the ability of people to like keep themselves safe.
The third demand is mechanisms for transparency. So we’ve talked already about people needing to be informed of their own status when all this testing is happening. CDCR also needs to also be in regular communication with people inside and their families about what is going on about why, like, why these movements are happening.
Like we know that we know that early last week, several people with positive cases were moved into F yard. And they were there for about four hours and then moved out with the officials claiming that it was a mistake for them to have been there. But now there’s a huge outbreak in F facility where, where I know people whose loved ones now are positive for COVID. So no there’s been no accountability and no communication with people on the outside about what’s happening. So CDCR needs to explain these movements. And explain its overall plan for restoring better conditions and getting the outbreak under control. And we think that video visiting is a good way to create some actual transparency and visibility to what’s happening inside. It’s not likely that it’s safe to restore in prison visiting, although that’s an ultimate goal, video visiting will allow people to sort of safely communicate with their loved ones and report what’s happening.
KH: I think so many of us are in a constant state of anxiety. We have our masks, our hand sanitizer, our face shields, we get things delivered when we can, and we are avoiding other people like the plague because we think they might actually have the plague. What do you think those of us who are really caught up in our own fears and anxieties need to understand about how people in prison are experiencing this moment?
E: I think that it’s difficult to imagine how much being in prison can or does ratchet up the kind of paranoia that we’re just getting used to on the outside about the surfaces that we touch, about sanitizing our hands, about the people that we come in contact with. Imagine having no control. Imagine having no ability to be more than six feet away from someone, or no ability to control the amount of people and the sort of status of people that you’re exposed to on a daily basis. And this, in addition to all the other background conditions that we’ve described, so basically to know that you’re in this situation where COVID-19 is everywhere and have zero empowerment to do anything about it and to constantly held in that kind of precarity.
KH: I don’t think most people understand that submersion, that total evacuation of autonomy, and what that means when your environment is barbaric and in a constant state of deterioration.
E: Yeah, absolutely. And it is like, COVID-19 is just another kind of node in this systemic just the, the way that people’s autonomy is like absolutely violated and consistently violated by prison, like COVID-19 is just another aspect of that — like a new way for institutions to keep people scared disempowered and in danger.
KH: So there’s a new administration around the corner, and a lot of us are hopeful that we will finally see a coherent response to COVID-19 from the federal government. But unfortunately, the mass expansion of the prison industrial complex and the torturous conditions of the system were not invented by the Trump administration. The nightmarish system that created a perfect framework for incubating this disease has been a bipartisan project, and Biden and Harris have both been extreme purveyors of carceral violence. While I believe I will have a better chance of not dying of COVID-19 under a Biden administration, I am not sure how quickly anything will change for people inside the prison industrial complex, or if it will. Is there any real discussion among the prisoners about whether Trump’s exit will change anything for them, or are folks just kind of trying to survive the winter?
E: That’s a really good question. I think in a lot of ways people are just trying to survive the winter. I think the biggest danger of moving into a Biden administration is that people will be less apt to pay attention to things like this. And I think like there’s not to my knowledge, any signs of improvement. And I think like what new restrictions and safety measures we see on the outside, like it takes people looking really hard and creating accountability just to make sure they happen at all on the inside. And I think one of the talking points that the hunger strikers have been emphasizing is that if this were any other kind of situation where human beings were in danger, these facilities would be evacuated, would be like absolutely emptied out. Because they’re incubators of COVID-19, because they’re supercharging this pandemic that we’re supposedly contending with and supposedly trying to get rid of prisons, our prisons are amplifying that virus. So the call is to free them all and to evacuate these places. But yeah, there’s that, that often feels a long way off.
KH: It really can. But here, in this moment, I feel like we still have a lot of decisions to make, and that in each of those decisions, there is potential. Like the decision people made to listen to this entire podcast, even though this is a tough subject that they could easily sort of divide from themselves and dismiss. That’s a decision, and that decision might make something else possible, like them looking up y’alls website or checking out the show notes for ways to get involved, or even just reading up more on the subject. We all have so many choices to make that can lead us places, and that can lead us to people, people who share our values, or at least one value — one that’s enough to galvanize us. Because whatever else we all like or don’t like about each other, we are all locked in a battle over what life and death mean. And I think there are so many ways to show up for that fight, and advocating for the people this system is telling you to forget, is a really essential way to do that.
Things are going to get worse before they get better, and we know that, but trauma doesn’t always break people. When people work together to survive a crisis, and to keep other people alive during a crisis, it can strengthen their bonds, and their determination and their values. That could happen. Or we could become more insular, more detached from each other’s fates, and we could wind up setting up the lowest bar imaginable, because Trump, as a point of comparison, makes it very easy to do that. My feeling, in this moment, is that our choices, our organizing, and the things we make and share and build in this moment, will help drive those outcomes. We could come through this winter valuing life more, and valuing each other more, and making bigger demands than ever. We could, as my young friend Bresha Meadows says, “care more and more about what happens to people over time, not less and less.” I really think the way that we handle this crisis is going to dictate so much that comes after. So I am so grateful for everything that you all are doing, Eric, to support imprisoned people who are fighting for themselves right now. And really for all of us, because that’s a fight for all of our humanity.
E: Yeah, absolutely. And thank you so much for saying that. Yeah, I think, you know where the hope is, is in that notion of collective survival. And like, and we have to, like if we’re going to get through this and like you say, if we’re going to get through this with our humanity, I mean, we have to see people inside as, as us because they are us, and that’s something that so many people are sort of inculturated against. The dividing line between inside and out in this, is this well-maintained political force that, that keeps us from having this kind of solidarity or sense of collective survival. And, and I’m glad to see that there could be hope of breaking that down. And I appreciate you so much, you know, putting, putting this under the, under the magnifying glass.
KH: Well, if you all want to learn more about this struggle and what you can do to support, we are going to have some materials to check out on our website, so please do get involved, in whatever way that you can, and please remember that the crisis we are talking about today is just one of many, and that there is probably a similar crisis playing out at a facility near you. There may already be organizers like Eric, who are already working on it, whose efforts you can join. If not, there are a lot of tools and resources out there to learn from, in terms of how to support people who are trying to survive inside of jails, prisons and detention centers and we will hook you up with as much as we can in the show notes.
Eric, I want to thank you so much for joining us today.
E: Thank you so much for having me. It’s been, it’s been a real pleasure and an honor.
KH: And I want to say to anyone imprisoned in the path of this disease, if you can hear or ready this: we haven’t given up, and we won’t. I also want to thank our listeners for joining us today, and remember, our best defense against cynicism is to do good, and to remember, that the good we do matters. Until next time, I’ll see you in the streets.
Show Notes
Organizing Resources:
Can you make a call or send an email? Organizers with the Chicago Community Bond Fund are calling on the Cook County State’s Attorney and Chief Judge to take bold action to reduce the number of people incarcerated in Cook County Jail. Current incarceration rates and practices at the facility are putting thousands of people at risk, both in and outside the facility. You can find call-in and email scripts here.
Want to demand the release of people in ICE custody? Detention Watch Network’s #FreeThemAll: Toolkit to Support Local Demands for Mass Release of People in ICE Custody is a “working toolkit to help guide and support the work of organizations and individuals looking to demand the release of people in ICE custody.”
Want to take action? The American Friends Services Committee will be hosting a week of action to #FreeThemAll from December 10 through December 18 with events and actions for people to plug into across the country. Resources will also be available for people who would like to organize their action. You can learn more here.
Want to learn more about Oakland Abolition & Solidarity? You can read more about their work here.
Must-Read Articles:
Report Finds Over 100 Rebellions in Jails and Prisons Over COVID Conditions
Hunger Strike Enters Third Week at California’s Largest Prison
Books:
Locked Down, Locked Out: Why Prison Doesn’t Work and How We Can Do Better by Maya Schenwar
Prison by Any Other Name: The Harmful Consequences of Popular Reforms by Maya Schenwar and Victoria Law
Tired of reading the same old news from the same old sources? So are we! That’s why we’re on a mission to shake things up and bring you the stories and perspectives that often go untold in mainstream media. But being a radically, unapologetically independent news site isn’t easy (or cheap), and we rely on reader support to keep the lights on.
If you like what you’re reading, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. We’re not asking for a handout, we’re asking for an investment: Invest in a nonprofit news site that’s not afraid to ruffle a few feathers, not afraid to stand up for what’s right, and not afraid to tell it like it is.
Copyright © Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.


truthout--2020-11-19--CDC Urges Americans Not to Travel for Thanksgiving

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) is recommending that most Americans not travel for Thanksgiving , urging instead for people to stay at home and celebrate within their own households in order to prevent the spread of coronavirus this holiday season .
Noting that more than 1 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported within the past week alone , the CDC stated Thursday that “ postponing travel and staying home is the best way to protect yourself and others this year.
” The health agency created a checklist for individuals to consider before making plans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether someone in the household is at greater risk of contracting the virus , if the number of cases at their travel destination ( or at their origin ) is high , and if those in attendance at Thanksgiving festivities this year have avoided contact with others outside of their home for the past 14 days .
The checklist also asks whether travel will require a transportation method that does not allow for social distancing , and whether hospitals at travel destinations are overwhelmed with caseloads .
If a person can answer “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the checklist , the CDC advises against travel this year for Thanksgiving .
“ It ’ s important to talk with the people you live with and your family and friends about the risks of traveling for Thanksgiving , ” the CDC website says .
While the CDC has recommended caution or staying at home altogether during the Thanksgiving weekend , the Trump White House has expressed far less concern for public health .
President Donald Trump ’ s favored coronavirus task force member , Scott Atlas , who has made dubious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , has urged Americans to carry on with Thanksgiving plans , including visits with those who might be at higher risk of contracting the virus .
White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany , who has criticized the science behind protecting Americans from coronavirus for getting “ in the way ” of people going about their lives , described restrictions on Thanksgiving travel as “ Orwellian.
” Most Americans , however , do not trust Trump or his administration when it comes to advice on coronavirus .
According to data from exit polling after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ percent of voters said President-elect Joe Biden would handle the crisis better , versus just 43 percent who said Trump was more able to handle the pandemic .
Anthony Fauci , who serves on the coronavirus task force team and as the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , has made different recommendations than Trump loyalists at the White House .
The infectious diseases expert , whom Americans overwhelmingly trust , said that people need to assess the risk of travel this year , especially during a period of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to travel and go to a Thanksgiving meal where there may be 12 , 15 , 20 people ?
” Fauci rhetorically asked during an interview with USA Today on Wednesday .

The CDC notes that more than 1 million Americans have contracted coronavirus in the past week alone.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is recommending that most Americans not travel for Thanksgiving, urging instead for people to stay at home and celebrate within their own households in order to prevent the spread of coronavirus this holiday season.
Noting that more than 1 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported within the past week alone, the CDC stated Thursday that “postponing travel and staying home is the best way to protect yourself and others this year.”
The health agency created a checklist for individuals to consider before making plans to travel. Among the considerations include whether someone in the household is at greater risk of contracting the virus, if the number of cases at their travel destination (or at their origin) is high, and if those in attendance at Thanksgiving festivities this year have avoided contact with others outside of their home for the past 14 days.
The checklist also asks whether travel will require a transportation method that does not allow for social distancing, and whether hospitals at travel destinations are overwhelmed with caseloads.
If a person can answer “yes” to any of the questions on the checklist, the CDC advises against travel this year for Thanksgiving.
“It’s important to talk with the people you live with and your family and friends about the risks of traveling for Thanksgiving,” the CDC website says.
While the CDC has recommended caution or staying at home altogether during the Thanksgiving weekend, the Trump White House has expressed far less concern for public health.
President Donald Trump’s favored coronavirus task force member, Scott Atlas, who has made dubious and dangerous suggestions for handling the pandemic, has urged Americans to carry on with Thanksgiving plans, including visits with those who might be at higher risk of contracting the virus. White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, who has criticized the science behind protecting Americans from coronavirus for getting “in the way” of people going about their lives, described restrictions on Thanksgiving travel as “Orwellian.”
Most Americans, however, do not trust Trump or his administration when it comes to advice on coronavirus. According to data from exit polling after this year’s election, 53 percent of voters said President-elect Joe Biden would handle the crisis better, versus just 43 percent who said Trump was more able to handle the pandemic.
Anthony Fauci, who serves on the coronavirus task force team and as the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has made different recommendations than Trump loyalists at the White House. The infectious diseases expert, whom Americans overwhelmingly trust, said that people need to assess the risk of travel this year, especially during a period of increased infection.
“Do you want to travel and go to a Thanksgiving meal where there may be 12, 15, 20 people?” Fauci rhetorically asked during an interview with USA Today on Wednesday.
Tired of reading the same old news from the same old sources? So are we! That’s why we’re on a mission to shake things up and bring you the stories and perspectives that often go untold in mainstream media. But being a radically, unapologetically independent news site isn’t easy (or cheap), and we rely on reader support to keep the lights on.
If you like what you’re reading, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. We’re not asking for a handout, we’re asking for an investment: Invest in a nonprofit news site that’s not afraid to ruffle a few feathers, not afraid to stand up for what’s right, and not afraid to tell it like it is.
Copyright © Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.


truthout--2020-11-19--Trump-Backing Nonprofit Gave Millions to Swing State Voter Registration Groups

A nonprofit created to support President Donald Trump and his administration gave more than $ 2 million in 2019 to newly formed groups whose contacts with voters came under investigation in both Florida and North Carolina this year , according to a new tax filing from the group , America First Policies .
America First Policies ’ president is named Brian Walsh .
The group gave grants to three nonprofits — Florida First , North Carolina First and Pennsylvania First — all of which list a director named Brian Walsh , according to incorporation records filed in Texas .
America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nearly $ 2.3 million collectively , according to America First Policies ’ 990 tax filing .
By law , nonprofits such as America First Policies can ’ t have partisan politics as a primary purpose , but there ’ s no prohibition against spending money on voter registration work .
In June 2019 , America First Policies announced it would seek to spend more than $ 20 million registering voters in Florida , Pennsylvania , North Carolina and Georgia in advance of the 2020 elections .
The three groups that received grants — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Carolina First , one formed in July 2019 and two formed in September 2019 , according to the Texas incorporation records — appear to have been part of that effort , and the new tax filing confirms the links between the groups and the extent of America First Policies ’ initial support .
All three groups had nearly identical websites .
“ America First ’ s operatives are hiding behind state-themed entities that give the appearance of being homegrown operations when , in actuality , the effort appears to be orchestrated by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outside political operation of choice , ” said Anna Massoglia , a researcher at the Center for Responsive Politics , which tracks money in politics .
“ The extra layers of opacity keep the group ’ s ties to a political operation endorsed by Trump himself largely hidden.
” The Center for Responsive Politics obtained a copy of the tax filing and shared it with the Center for Public Integrity .
A spokeswoman for America First Policies later provided a separate copy of the document but did not respond to emails requesting comment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contributing to Florida First .
America First Policies is affiliated with the super PAC America First Action and the two groups also share leadership .
The groups are technically independent of Trump and his campaign , but the president himself has endorsed the super PAC .
His campaign last year issued a statement calling it the “ one approved outside non-campaign group.
” Earlier this year , voters contacted the North Carolina State Board of Elections to report strange calls involving their voter registration , according to a report by North Carolina station @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of elections initially contacted a lawyer for a similarly named North Carolina-based group , who said his client wasn ’ t involved .
That lawyer filed a complaint with the North Carolina Secretary of State ’ s office , saying he had also received complaints about the Texas-based group ’ s outreach to voters , WBTV reported .
WBTV reported that investigators for the North Carolina Secretary of State ’ s office reached out to the Texas-based group and subsequently forwarded information to the office of the state attorney general , but the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A spokeswoman for the state attorney general ’ s office said it does not have an active investigation into the group .
Patrick Gannon , a spokesman for the North Carolina State Board of Elections , said the board has received no additional information or complaints about North Carolina First .
The new America First Policies tax filing shows the Texas-based North Carolina First group received a $ 325,000 grant in 2019 .
Florida First , the most high-profile of the three groups , got the biggest grant from America First Policies : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s voter registration push hit controversy last March , when authorities said more than 100 voter registration forms submitted by the group had forged signatures , unauthorized party registration switches and other problems .
Authorities charged a canvasser for the group with 10 felony counts of submitting false voter registration information , but said they did not believe Florida First itself was engaged in or encouraging fraud .
The group had submitted nearly 50,000 voter registration forms in the Sunshine State as of August 2020 , the Tampa Bay Times reported .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ voter registration numbers as a strong sign for them in Florida , a state Trump ultimately won .
Florida First had registered with the Florida Secretary of State ’ s office as a third-party organization conducting voter registration in the state , but the email address provided to the state is no longer active and no one responded to a phone message requesting comment .
The organization is currently listed as inactive in the database maintained by the Florida Division of Corporations .
The third group , Pennsylvania First , appears to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a $ 450,000 grant from America First Policies , according to the tax filing .
America First Policies ’ disclosure also shows it raised about $ 30.8 million from 31 contributors in 2019 , though the nonprofit is not required to publicly disclose the identity of its donors .
Two of those contributions — for $ 5 million each — made up about a third of the total raised , and 16 contributors gave at least $ 1 million .

This article was originally published by the Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit investigative news organization based in Washington, D.C.
A nonprofit created to support President Donald Trump and his administration gave more than $2 million in 2019 to newly formed groups whose contacts with voters came under investigation in both Florida and North Carolina this year, according to a new tax filing from the group, America First Policies.
America First Policies’ president is named Brian Walsh. The group gave grants to three nonprofits — Florida First, North Carolina First and Pennsylvania First — all of which list a director named Brian Walsh, according to incorporation records filed in Texas.
America First Policies gave the three fledgling nonprofits nearly $2.3 million collectively, according to America First Policies’ 990 tax filing.
By law, nonprofits such as America First Policies can’t have partisan politics as a primary purpose, but there’s no prohibition against spending money on voter registration work. In June 2019, America First Policies announced it would seek to spend more than $20 million registering voters in Florida, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Georgia in advance of the 2020 elections.
The three groups that received grants — Florida First, Pennsylvania First and North Carolina First, one formed in July 2019 and two formed in September 2019, according to the Texas incorporation records — appear to have been part of that effort, and the new tax filing confirms the links between the groups and the extent of America First Policies’ initial support. All three groups had nearly identical websites.
“America First’s operatives are hiding behind state-themed entities that give the appearance of being homegrown operations when, in actuality, the effort appears to be orchestrated by the dark money arm of Trump’s outside political operation of choice,” said Anna Massoglia, a researcher at the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks money in politics. “The extra layers of opacity keep the group’s ties to a political operation endorsed by Trump himself largely hidden.”
The Center for Responsive Politics obtained a copy of the tax filing and shared it with the Center for Public Integrity. A spokeswoman for America First Policies later provided a separate copy of the document but did not respond to emails requesting comment. America First Policies has previously confirmed contributing to Florida First.
America First Policies is affiliated with the super PAC America First Action and the two groups also share leadership. The groups are technically independent of Trump and his campaign, but the president himself has endorsed the super PAC. His campaign last year issued a statement calling it the “one approved outside non-campaign group.”
Earlier this year, voters contacted the North Carolina State Board of Elections to report strange calls involving their voter registration, according to a report by North Carolina station WBTV. Investigators for the state board of elections initially contacted a lawyer for a similarly named North Carolina-based group, who said his client wasn’t involved. That lawyer filed a complaint with the North Carolina Secretary of State’s office, saying he had also received complaints about the Texas-based group’s outreach to voters, WBTV reported.
WBTV reported that investigators for the North Carolina Secretary of State’s office reached out to the Texas-based group and subsequently forwarded information to the office of the state attorney general, but the investigations appear to have fizzled out. A spokeswoman for the state attorney general’s office said it does not have an active investigation into the group. Patrick Gannon, a spokesman for the North Carolina State Board of Elections, said the board has received no additional information or complaints about North Carolina First.
The new America First Policies tax filing shows the Texas-based North Carolina First group received a $325,000 grant in 2019.
Florida First, the most high-profile of the three groups, got the biggest grant from America First Policies: $1.51 million. But Florida First’s voter registration push hit controversy last March, when authorities said more than 100 voter registration forms submitted by the group had forged signatures, unauthorized party registration switches and other problems. Authorities charged a canvasser for the group with 10 felony counts of submitting false voter registration information, but said they did not believe Florida First itself was engaged in or encouraging fraud.
The group had submitted nearly 50,000 voter registration forms in the Sunshine State as of August 2020, the Tampa Bay Times reported. By October, Republicans were pointing to voter registration numbers as a strong sign for them in Florida, a state Trump ultimately won.
Florida First had registered with the Florida Secretary of State’s office as a third-party organization conducting voter registration in the state, but the email address provided to the state is no longer active and no one responded to a phone message requesting comment. The organization is currently listed as inactive in the database maintained by the Florida Division of Corporations.
The third group, Pennsylvania First, appears to have drawn little public attention. It received a $450,000 grant from America First Policies, according to the tax filing.
America First Policies’ disclosure also shows it raised about $30.8 million from 31 contributors in 2019, though the nonprofit is not required to publicly disclose the identity of its donors. Two of those contributions — for $5 million each — made up about a third of the total raised, and 16 contributors gave at least $1 million.
Tired of reading the same old news from the same old sources? So are we! That’s why we’re on a mission to shake things up and bring you the stories and perspectives that often go untold in mainstream media. But being a radically, unapologetically independent news site isn’t easy (or cheap), and we rely on reader support to keep the lights on.
If you like what you’re reading, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. We’re not asking for a handout, we’re asking for an investment: Invest in a nonprofit news site that’s not afraid to ruffle a few feathers, not afraid to stand up for what’s right, and not afraid to tell it like it is.
This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.


truthout--2020-11-19--Trump Seeks to Disenfranchise More than 1 in 10 Voters in 6 Key States

President Donald Trump ’ s legal team and his conservative allies are seeking to invalidate one out of every 10 votes cast within six key states in the 2020 presidential election , according to a new analysis by The Washington Post .
The analysis , penned by The Post ’ s senior political writer Aaron Blake , notes that Trump ’ s legal team and other litigants aligned with the president have led challenges in six states integral to the final Electoral College count in this year ’ s race : Arizona , Georgia , Michigan , Nevada , Pennsylvania @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legal challenges were successful , one out of every 10 voters in those six states , amounting to about 2.5 million voters overall , would be disenfranchised this year .
The number of votes being challenged is likely higher , as the analysis doesn ’ t include a new lawsuit filed by the campaign on Wednesday , which seeks to invalidate all votes cast in Pennsylvania .
Some outside groups are attempting to help Trump win another term , in spite of declarations from almost every mainstream media source in the country noting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the presumed president-elect , based on vote tallies in all 50 states plus D.C .
In Wisconsin , for example , a lawsuit from an outside group sought to dismiss ballots in the Democratic strongholds of Dane and Milwaukee counties .
The Post analysis also includes the effort by Wayne County , Michigan , Republican officials to decertify votes within their jurisdiction .
Meanwhile , the Trump campaign is attempting to invalidate all votes within the entire state of Pennsylvania .
According to a lawsuit filed by Trump ’ s lawyers on Wednesday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a court declare him the winner of the election in that state , and to allow the state ’ s legislature , which is presently controlled by Republican lawmakers , to award him the state ’ s 20 Electoral College votes .
The lawsuit contends that 1.5 million votes were improperly tabulated after Election Day , and further alleges that the final vote totals should be dismissed over unfounded allegations that election observers weren ’ t granted adequate access to check ballots during the count .
The attempt by Trump ’ s lawyers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ change the election outcome , as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled earlier this week that observers were indeed given reasonable accommodations to watch and challenge the counting of votes after November 3 .
If the Trump campaign is successful , the final count would disregard the outcome of a state race that saw 6.9 million voters cast ballots , including 3.45 million ( roughly 50 percent ) who voted for Biden .
For comparison , Trump received about 48.8 percent of the vote in Pennsylvania .
Neither the challenges in the six states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawsuit brought forward in Pennsylvania by Trump ’ s lawyers on Wednesday , appear likely to win or drastically alter the outcome of the presidential race .
Still , the moves perhaps indicate what lengths that Trump and his legal team are willing to go to in order to attempt to secure him a second term in the White House , in spite of what voters across the U.S .

The legal challenges Trump is waging demonstrate his willingness to win at any cost, including at the voters’ expense.
President Donald Trump’s legal team and his conservative allies are seeking to invalidate one out of every 10 votes cast within six key states in the 2020 presidential election, according to a new analysis by The Washington Post.
The analysis, penned by The Post’s senior political writer Aaron Blake, notes that Trump’s legal team and other litigants aligned with the president have led challenges in six states integral to the final Electoral College count in this year’s race: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
If all of the legal challenges were successful, one out of every 10 voters in those six states, amounting to about 2.5 million voters overall, would be disenfranchised this year.
The number of votes being challenged is likely higher, as the analysis doesn’t include a new lawsuit filed by the campaign on Wednesday, which seeks to invalidate all votes cast in Pennsylvania.
Some outside groups are attempting to help Trump win another term, in spite of declarations from almost every mainstream media source in the country noting that Democratic candidate Joe Biden is indeed the presumed president-elect, based on vote tallies in all 50 states plus D.C.
In Wisconsin, for example, a lawsuit from an outside group sought to dismiss ballots in the Democratic strongholds of Dane and Milwaukee counties. The Post analysis also includes the effort by Wayne County, Michigan, Republican officials to decertify votes within their jurisdiction.
Meanwhile, the Trump campaign is attempting to invalidate all votes within the entire state of Pennsylvania. According to a lawsuit filed by Trump’s lawyers on Wednesday, the president is seeking to have a court declare him the winner of the election in that state, and to allow the state’s legislature, which is presently controlled by Republican lawmakers, to award him the state’s 20 Electoral College votes.
The lawsuit contends that 1.5 million votes were improperly tabulated after Election Day, and further alleges that the final vote totals should be dismissed over unfounded allegations that election observers weren’t granted adequate access to check ballots during the count.
The attempt by Trump’s lawyers may be a final long shot to change the election outcome, as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled earlier this week that observers were indeed given reasonable accommodations to watch and challenge the counting of votes after November 3.
If the Trump campaign is successful, the final count would disregard the outcome of a state race that saw 6.9 million voters cast ballots, including 3.45 million (roughly 50 percent) who voted for Biden. For comparison, Trump received about 48.8 percent of the vote in Pennsylvania.
Neither the challenges in the six states analyzed by The Post, nor the lawsuit brought forward in Pennsylvania by Trump’s lawyers on Wednesday, appear likely to win or drastically alter the outcome of the presidential race. Still, the moves perhaps indicate what lengths that Trump and his legal team are willing to go to in order to attempt to secure him a second term in the White House, in spite of what voters across the U.S.
Tired of reading the same old news from the same old sources? So are we! That’s why we’re on a mission to shake things up and bring you the stories and perspectives that often go untold in mainstream media. But being a radically, unapologetically independent news site isn’t easy (or cheap), and we rely on reader support to keep the lights on.
If you like what you’re reading, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. We’re not asking for a handout, we’re asking for an investment: Invest in a nonprofit news site that’s not afraid to ruffle a few feathers, not afraid to stand up for what’s right, and not afraid to tell it like it is.
Copyright © Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.