therealnews--2020-05-07--FBI Finds Evidence Of Israeli Intervention In Trump’s 2016 Campaign

This is a rush transcript and may contain errors .
It will be updated .
Kim Brown : Welcome to The Real News .
I ’ m Kim Brown .
The US presidential elections of 2016 had such a profound impact on the world .
A few did predict some of the things that happened , but many others did not .
Now President Donald Trump ’ s policies seem to clash so clearly with the interests of the citizens of the US that there is no shortage of speculations , reaching from conspiracy theories to proven facts , about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and for what purpose .
Here at The Real News , we reported about Russiagate , the Russian involvement with the 2016 election campaign , and also about US involvement in the politics of other countries .
But new evidence shows that the Israeli government illegally offered and gave Candidate Trump intelligence which may have contributed to his victory .
The FBI released new documents showing that an Israeli minister met with Trump advisor , Roger Stone , who has since been convicted of tampering with justice , and offered him information collected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information was reported by Politico .
Richard Silverstein , in his blog , Tikun Olam , exposed that the Israeli minister involved is most likely Tzachi Hanegbi , Netanyahu ’ s lapdog .
So indeed , when Trump won the presidential election , one man was not surprised .
Speaker 2 : President-elect Trump , my friend , congratulations on being elected president of the United States of America .
You are a great friend of Israel .
Over the years , you have expressed your support consistently , and I deeply appreciate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with you to advance security , prosperity and peace .
Israel is grateful for the broad support it enjoys among the American people , and I am confident that the two of us , working closely together , will bring the great alliance between our two countries to even greater heights .
May God bless America .
May God bless Israel .
May God bless our enduring alliance .
Kim Brown : Richard Silverstein joins us today .
He ’ s an independent journalist who writes the blog , Tikun Olam , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Israeli-Arab conflict .
He joins us today from Seattle .
Richard , thank you so much for being here .
Richard Silvers… : I ’ m glad to do it .
Thank you .
Kim Brown : So this , to me , is a very fascinating topic .
So let ’ s start with what has been reported .
In your opinion , tell us who is Tzachi Hanegbi and what made you think that he was the unnamed minister from the FBI report .
Richard Silvers… : Well , the FBI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contact , but Israeli media have taken sort of the breadcrumbs in the FBI document and figured out , based on what they said about this person , that it was indeed Tzachi Hanegbi , who is a long-time Likud apparatchik who has sort of risen in the ranks over years to be one of Netanyahu ’ s closest political confidantes .
At the time he was a minister without portfolio specializing in military and foreign affairs , which made him a perfect intermediary in this situation with Roger Stone .
Because during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of months before the 2016 election , Hanegbi made regular visits to the United States , and many of those visits were designed to try to create this meeting with Trump through Roger Stone .
In the documents , Hanegbi is portrayed as telling Stone that it looks like Trump ’ s candidacy is doomed , but that he needs an October surprise to pull things out and that Israel has just the ticket for him .
It doesn ’ t really go into detail about what the particular intelligence information is , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of these meetings at least , Hanegbi , with another colleague of Stone named Jerome Corsi , brought an Israeli IDF lieutenant general to the conference , to the meeting .
So there is this element of Israeli intelligence being used and offered to Trump in order to win the election .
I ’ m trying to figure out , find out what exactly the intelligence information was , but you can imagine that that ’ s not readily available at this point .
Kim Brown : Well , Richard , let @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I mean , you just gave us the facts .
Now , let ’ s venture a bit into speculation .
I mean , what do you think was involved or contained in the intelligence report that the Trump administration received from the unnamed Israeli minister ?
The term quid pro quo has floated around and attached itself to Donald Trump since he ’ s been president .
Let ’ s speculate here .
What do you think he got , and what do you think he was expected to give up ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ look at what the Russians have done , their style is what ’ s called kompromat , which is usually trying to morally compromise their enemies .
So it is possible that there was some kind of information that was meant to embarrass Hillary Clinton .
It ’ s possible that this was more along the lines of some substantive intelligence trove like Israel and Netanyahu constantly try to present Iranian documents proving that Iran is a nuclear power or wants to get nuclear weapons .
So it could be something along those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go back a little bit also and say that in the midst of the negotiations and the meetings that we ’ re talking about , it doesn ’ t seem , until the very last minute , that Hanegbi actually succeeded in meeting Trump .
But there is a point in the document where it says that the last correspondence between Stone and Hanegbi was on October 30 , 2016 , a few days before the election .
There is a message in the document that says that the person , whose name @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump on October 30th or actually right before October 30th .
That would mean if this was Hanegbi , that he did actually have the meeting with Trump .
If he did have this meeting , he did transfer the intelligence information .
So that really makes this conspiracy with a lot of substance to it rather than just a conspiracy in which they intended to sabotage the election but didn ’ t necessarily do it .
Now , in terms of your mention of quid pro quos , there are so many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you know , as your viewers know , Trump has created this deal of the century with his son-in-law , Jared Kushner .
It basically presents on a silver platter everything Israel has ever wanted in a peace agreement and deprives the Palestinians of anything that they ’ ve ever wanted .
So that would be one possible way in which he would repay this Israeli gift to him .
Trump also abrogated the nuclear accord with the Iranians and the European powers .
So Netanyahu for years has wanted to destroy the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ narrative that Iran is one of the great satans of world nations and an enemy to US interests and to Israel .
So those are two plum gifts that that Trump could be giving back to Netanyahu if this intelligence was transferred .
Kim Brown : Richard , in the United States , it ’ s illegal for candidates to accept help from a foreign country , but in Israel the law is a little different .
Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu have this mutually fawning relationship .
Trump supported , I believe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ since 2019 .
Talk to us about how these two men know each other .
The nature of their relationship seems not necessarily transparent , though it appears outwardly that they do like each other quite a bit , and they have a lot of overlapping things as it relates to personality and policy .
But how did this relationship get forged initially ?
Richard Silvers… : Well , Netanyahu , over the 15 years or so that he ’ s been prime minister , has tilted Israeli policy from being bipartisan in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republicans .
So he has , as you said , been fawning over all of the Republican candidates .
As you recall , during the Obama administration , he did a address to Congress , and he bypassed Obama , and he attacked US policy before the US Congress on Iran .
So that ’ s where the orientation towards the Republican party comes in terms of Netanyahu .
You would think though that these two men wouldn ’ t have much in common because Trump , if anything , is an anti-Semite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he is hostile towards Jews who are liberal or Democratic and has even said that Jews who support Democrats are betraying their own interests and their country by doing so .
But when it comes to Israel , Trump and Netanyahu have created this sort of relationship of convenience .
As you mentioned , they ’ re both sort of deeply narcissistic .
They both view themselves as sort of , they ’ re monomaniacs in terms of seeing themselves as the sole savior of their country and wanting to preserve their power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ huge ethical and legal complications from corruption .
In Netanyahu ’ s case , and of course Trump , we know is riddled with corruption .
Netanyahu doesn ’ t have any sexual peccadilloes that Trump does , but they ’ re very , very similar in their personality .
That has created this really odd couple between them and brought them together in this way , even though Netanyahu really is divorcing himself from the American Jewish community , which is very hostile to Donald Trump and also very hostile to Netanyahu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Kim Brown : If you could , Richard , before we let you go , can you update us on what the status is of the Netanyahu administration ?
There was a lot of news coming out of Israel regarding the elections , and then there was a lot of maneuvering happening .
Can you let us know what the latest is ?
Richard Silvers… : Yes , very complicated .
But we just had our third election in a year in Israel , and now there is an attempt to form @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opposition parties and Netanyahu ’ s Likud party .
However , because Netanyahu is under indictment on three different corruption charges , good government groups have petitioned the Supreme Court and asked it to exclude Netanyahu as prime minister .
There never has been a prime minister who has been indicted serving as prime minister , and so this is testing out new law in Israel .
He will , Netanyahu will be tried under these charges , and if he is convicted , which may take some time , he will not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But the Supreme Court so far has shown a willingness to let this indicted prime minister continue in that role .
Many Israelis who are liberal or centrist in their political views are really aghast at this because it betrays this continuing deterioration of moral values in Israeli politics that has been going on for quite some time .
So if , at some point , Netanyahu is convicted or the coalition falls apart , we will have a fourth election .
Again , another unprecedented development in Israeli politics and shows that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dysregulated and quite dysfunctional , which I guess is nothing new .
Kim Brown : Well , I ’ m hoping the United States doesn ’ t follow that pattern of election dysfunctionality as we approach our election in November , though it is looking like it could head in that direction .
But this is certainly a fascinating topic about the relationships and the dynamics between Netanyahu people and Donald Trump ’ s people and whether or not it played a part in the election of Donald Trump as the 45th president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you joining us today .
We ’ ve been speaking with Richard Silverstein .
He is an independent journalist who writes the blog , Tikun Olam .
It explores Jewish-Muslim relations and the Israeli-Arab conflict .
Richard , as always , we appreciate your reporting today .
Thank you so much .
Richard Silvers… : Thanks for having me .
It was fun .
I enjoyed it .
Thank you .
Kim Brown : Thank you for watching The Real News Network .

An Israeli minister met with Roger Stone to provide information that may have benefited the Trump campaign. The discovery implicates Netanyahu in an attempt to distort the 2016 US election result.
Story Transcript
This is a rush transcript and may contain errors. It will be updated.
Kim Brown: Welcome to The Real News. I’m Kim Brown. The US presidential elections of 2016 had such a profound impact on the world. A few did predict some of the things that happened, but many others did not. Now President Donald Trump’s policies seem to clash so clearly with the interests of the citizens of the US that there is no shortage of speculations, reaching from conspiracy theories to proven facts, about what interests have put him in power and for what purpose.
Here at The Real News, we reported about Russiagate, the Russian involvement with the 2016 election campaign, and also about US involvement in the politics of other countries. But new evidence shows that the Israeli government illegally offered and gave Candidate Trump intelligence which may have contributed to his victory. The FBI released new documents showing that an Israeli minister met with Trump advisor, Roger Stone, who has since been convicted of tampering with justice, and offered him information collected by Israeli intelligence services.
Now this information was reported by Politico. Richard Silverstein, in his blog, Tikun Olam, exposed that the Israeli minister involved is most likely Tzachi Hanegbi, Netanyahu’s lapdog. So indeed, when Trump won the presidential election, one man was not surprised.
Speaker 2: President-elect Trump, my friend, congratulations on being elected president of the United States of America. You are a great friend of Israel. Over the years, you have expressed your support consistently, and I deeply appreciate it. I look forward to working with you to advance security, prosperity and peace. Israel is grateful for the broad support it enjoys among the American people, and I am confident that the two of us, working closely together, will bring the great alliance between our two countries to even greater heights. May God bless America. May God bless Israel. May God bless our enduring alliance.
Kim Brown: Richard Silverstein joins us today. He’s an independent journalist who writes the blog, Tikun Olam, which explores Jewish and Muslim relations and the Israeli-Arab conflict. He joins us today from Seattle. Richard, thank you so much for being here.
Richard Silvers…: I’m glad to do it. Thank you.
Kim Brown: So this, to me, is a very fascinating topic. So let’s start with what has been reported. In your opinion, tell us who is Tzachi Hanegbi and what made you think that he was the unnamed minister from the FBI report.
Richard Silvers…: Well, the FBI documents have redacted the name of this contact, but Israeli media have taken sort of the breadcrumbs in the FBI document and figured out, based on what they said about this person, that it was indeed Tzachi Hanegbi, who is a long-time Likud apparatchik who has sort of risen in the ranks over years to be one of Netanyahu’s closest political confidantes. At the time he was a minister without portfolio specializing in military and foreign affairs, which made him a perfect intermediary in this situation with Roger Stone. Because during this period, which was a couple of months before the 2016 election, Hanegbi made regular visits to the United States, and many of those visits were designed to try to create this meeting with Trump through Roger Stone.
In the documents, Hanegbi is portrayed as telling Stone that it looks like Trump’s candidacy is doomed, but that he needs an October surprise to pull things out and that Israel has just the ticket for him. It doesn’t really go into detail about what the particular intelligence information is, but it does mention that, at one of these meetings at least, Hanegbi, with another colleague of Stone named Jerome Corsi, brought an Israeli IDF lieutenant general to the conference, to the meeting.
So there is this element of Israeli intelligence being used and offered to Trump in order to win the election. I’m trying to figure out, find out what exactly the intelligence information was, but you can imagine that that’s not readily available at this point.
Kim Brown: Well, Richard, let’s imagine, shall we? I mean, you just gave us the facts. Now, let’s venture a bit into speculation. I mean, what do you think was involved or contained in the intelligence report that the Trump administration received from the unnamed Israeli minister? The term quid pro quo has floated around and attached itself to Donald Trump since he’s been president. Let’s speculate here. What do you think he got, and what do you think he was expected to give up?
Richard Silvers…: Well, if we look at what the Russians have done, their style is what’s called kompromat, which is usually trying to morally compromise their enemies. So it is possible that there was some kind of information that was meant to embarrass Hillary Clinton. It’s possible that this was more along the lines of some substantive intelligence trove like Israel and Netanyahu constantly try to present Iranian documents proving that Iran is a nuclear power or wants to get nuclear weapons. So it could be something along those lines.
But I want to just go back a little bit also and say that in the midst of the negotiations and the meetings that we’re talking about, it doesn’t seem, until the very last minute, that Hanegbi actually succeeded in meeting Trump. But there is a point in the document where it says that the last correspondence between Stone and Hanegbi was on October 30, 2016, a few days before the election.
There is a message in the document that says that the person, whose name again is redacted, did meet with Trump on October 30th or actually right before October 30th. That would mean if this was Hanegbi, that he did actually have the meeting with Trump. If he did have this meeting, he did transfer the intelligence information. So that really makes this conspiracy with a lot of substance to it rather than just a conspiracy in which they intended to sabotage the election but didn’t necessarily do it.
Now, in terms of your mention of quid pro quos, there are so many possible quid pro quos here. As you know, as your viewers know, Trump has created this deal of the century with his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. It basically presents on a silver platter everything Israel has ever wanted in a peace agreement and deprives the Palestinians of anything that they’ve ever wanted. So that would be one possible way in which he would repay this Israeli gift to him.
Trump also abrogated the nuclear accord with the Iranians and the European powers. So Netanyahu for years has wanted to destroy the nuclear agreement with Iran and has this narrative that Iran is one of the great satans of world nations and an enemy to US interests and to Israel. So those are two plum gifts that that Trump could be giving back to Netanyahu if this intelligence was transferred.
Kim Brown: Richard, in the United States, it’s illegal for candidates to accept help from a foreign country, but in Israel the law is a little different. Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu have this mutually fawning relationship. Trump supported, I believe, now three presidential campaigns of Netanyahu since 2019. Talk to us about how these two men know each other. The nature of their relationship seems not necessarily transparent, though it appears outwardly that they do like each other quite a bit, and they have a lot of overlapping things as it relates to personality and policy. But how did this relationship get forged initially?
Richard Silvers…: Well, Netanyahu, over the 15 years or so that he’s been prime minister, has tilted Israeli policy from being bipartisan in US context to being solely oriented towards Republicans. So he has, as you said, been fawning over all of the Republican candidates. As you recall, during the Obama administration, he did a address to Congress, and he bypassed Obama, and he attacked US policy before the US Congress on Iran. So that’s where the orientation towards the Republican party comes in terms of Netanyahu.
You would think though that these two men wouldn’t have much in common because Trump, if anything, is an anti-Semite. He supports white supremacists, and he is hostile towards Jews who are liberal or Democratic and has even said that Jews who support Democrats are betraying their own interests and their country by doing so. But when it comes to Israel, Trump and Netanyahu have created this sort of relationship of convenience.
As you mentioned, they’re both sort of deeply narcissistic. They both view themselves as sort of, they’re monomaniacs in terms of seeing themselves as the sole savior of their country and wanting to preserve their power at any cost. They both face huge ethical and legal complications from corruption. In Netanyahu’s case, and of course Trump, we know is riddled with corruption. Netanyahu doesn’t have any sexual peccadilloes that Trump does, but they’re very, very similar in their personality. That has created this really odd couple between them and brought them together in this way, even though Netanyahu really is divorcing himself from the American Jewish community, which is very hostile to Donald Trump and also very hostile to Netanyahu’s political views about the Palestinians.
Kim Brown: If you could, Richard, before we let you go, can you update us on what the status is of the Netanyahu administration? There was a lot of news coming out of Israel regarding the elections, and then there was a lot of maneuvering happening. Can you let us know what the latest is?
Richard Silvers…: Yes, very complicated. But we just had our third election in a year in Israel, and now there is an attempt to form a unity government between one of the opposition parties and Netanyahu’s Likud party. However, because Netanyahu is under indictment on three different corruption charges, good government groups have petitioned the Supreme Court and asked it to exclude Netanyahu as prime minister. There never has been a prime minister who has been indicted serving as prime minister, and so this is testing out new law in Israel.
He will, Netanyahu will be tried under these charges, and if he is convicted, which may take some time, he will not be allowed to be prime minister. But the Supreme Court so far has shown a willingness to let this indicted prime minister continue in that role. Many Israelis who are liberal or centrist in their political views are really aghast at this because it betrays this continuing deterioration of moral values in Israeli politics that has been going on for quite some time.
So if, at some point, Netanyahu is convicted or the coalition falls apart, we will have a fourth election. Again, another unprecedented development in Israeli politics and shows that the country’s politics is quite dysregulated and quite dysfunctional, which I guess is nothing new.
Kim Brown: Well, I’m hoping the United States doesn’t follow that pattern of election dysfunctionality as we approach our election in November, though it is looking like it could head in that direction. But this is certainly a fascinating topic about the relationships and the dynamics between Netanyahu people and Donald Trump’s people and whether or not it played a part in the election of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States.
We appreciate you joining us today. We’ve been speaking with Richard Silverstein. He is an independent journalist who writes the blog, Tikun Olam. It explores Jewish-Muslim relations and the Israeli-Arab conflict. Richard, as always, we appreciate your reporting today. Thank you so much.
Richard Silvers…: Thanks for having me. It was fun. I enjoyed it. Thank you.
Kim Brown: Thank you for watching The Real News Network.
Production: Genevieve Montinar, Taylor Hebden, Andrew Corkery
Studio: Taylor Hebden
Related
Republish This Story Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.


therealnews--2020-05-07--Sanders Is Back On The NY Primary Ballot

This interview was recorded prior to the ruling reinstating Bernie Sanders on the New York primary election ballot .
This is a rush transcript and may contain errors .
It will be updated .
Marc Steiner : Welcome to The Real News .
I ’ m Marc Steiner .
Good to have you all with us .
New York has canceled its primary election , forcing Bernie Sanders ’ name off the ballot .
Sanders in a statement has called this a blow to democracy .
And California seems to be changing the rules , and even though Sanders won @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the majority of the delegates to the convention in Milwaukee .
Part of the Sanders strategy was to have a huge delegate presence to push the progressive agenda , which is popular with most Democrats and Americans in general .
How might this affect the November election ?
Will this rift widen between Biden and Sanders , between the establishment Democrats and the progressives ?
In the midst of this pandemic so badly handled by Trump , are Democrats with little effective public response and feuding internally handing this election right over to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Well , we ’ re going to talk about that .
We ’ re joined by Norman Solomon .
He was co-founder and national coordinator of RootsAction.org , the founder and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy , and Marcus Farrell , former African American outreach director for Bernie Sanders in 2016 , former deputy campaign manager for Stacey Abrams , former chief of staff of the New Georgia Project , and currently a political consultant and now becoming a frequent guest like Norman on The Real News .
Good @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Welcome .
Marcus Farrell : Nice to be here .
Marc Steiner : Let me start , Norman , with you since you ’ re in California where some of the latest news came out .
What the hell is happening here ?
I mean , what do you think the dynamic is going on , both of you , that New York has canceled its election and California is debating on what ’ s counted in the delegates .
Politically , what do you think is going on internally ?
Norman Solomon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out with delegates is very murky , but I think it comes under the general heading of the victor gets the spoils .
And so while in the last month since Bernie Sanders suspended his campaign , there ’ s been quite a few pats on the head from Joe Biden and rhetorical flourishes in a progressive direction , we ’ re pretty much having a consolidation of control over the prospective nomination from the Biden forces and those economic and political powers that he represents .
It ’ s really a time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I think a lot of progressives are trying to find new footing over this new terrain .
And just to sort of sum up , we have as usual , but with a heightened acuity , this dual responsibility to fight the right wing , the racists , the misogynists , the nativists , and so forth , so ably represented and viciously implemented by the Trump administration .
And on the other hand , to really fight for and advance a progressive agenda , which requires combat , nonviolent but vehement combat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a lot of progressives are looking for the best ways forward to thread both of those needles at the same time .
Marc Steiner : Marcus , how do you read this ?
You ’ ve been in the middle of all of this , this campaign for a while .
Marcus Farrell : Listen , when they talk about voting in the presidential election , one thing that folks typically bring up is how you need to vote down-ballot .
I compare voting down-ballot also to being involved in local and state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s only the DNC that might have sort of an agenda to make sure that progressives don ’ t have their voice heard .
It ’ s more than just the DNC .
It goes all the way down to your city party .
There are people in this country who are Democrats , who fundamentally hate the idea of a progressive America .
Half of them don ’ t even know why they hate the idea of a progressive America .
It ’ s more so a cult of personality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and your friends aren ’ t your friends .
If you supported Bernie Sanders in 2016 and 2020 , that means that you ’ re a bad person .
So we have to fight to make sure that our down-ballot down-statewide parties are infiltrated by progressive people to make sure that there are fair actions across the board .
This is a muting of a progressive platform and , and it ’ s a very obvious thing that when Milwaukee comes around , and hopefully Milwaukee doesn ’ t come around , hopefully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t want you all bringing you all coronavirus-having asses to a black city and giving more of my people your little whatever you got , right ?
But when that moment happens , this is to make sure that the numbers and the pressure is not there .
What we ’ re seeing is as a progressive , and I ’ ll speak as a black progressive , what we ’ re seeing is a dual phase approach to subvert voters .
First you have the DNC subverting , I guess not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ subverting the will of more progressive folks .
And you also have a Trump administration who ’ s opening up the country right now at the same time , to aggressively almost attack black and brown communities who they know are going to show up in droves in November .
So it ’ s a very interesting place .
Marc Steiner : It is .
So let me take it from that point that both of you just said .
I ’ ve just read on the news before we went on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to end his coronavirus task force by sometime in May , at the end of May .
And the way this administration has handled this pandemic has been absurd .
It ’ s been like a clown show , except for the few people around him like Fauci and others were at least trying to do something to stem the tide of this pandemic .
Given that , and given the polls that show many Americans , most Americans are just fed up with Trump at a larger scale .
They call themselves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the left , whoever they are .
But it seems to me that what ’ s under this internal feud that allows this moment that could take down the right wing to be divided so that they actually can win a victory , because people get so internally divided that you can not win an election .
Marcus Farrell : Pride and ego .
I mean , let ’ s start there .
We want to win the way that we want to win .
We want to bring it back to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their money across and we can continue to do things like neglected progressive voices .
So the question is , do we want to have common sense as a Democratic Party ?
I ’ m a 20-year Democrat , I ’ m a Southern black voter , I live in Atlanta , Georgia right now .
And if you look around , and the state just dropped a poll I think last week saying that over 60 % of people in the state actually think that the governor ’ s handling of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s the same thing with the American polls when it comes down to Donald Trump .
But the internal divide comes from a place of , we still fundamentally want capitalism to happen after this is over with .
We just want our brand of it .
And at the end of the day , it ’ s as simple as it can get .
It ’ s an unfortunate place , because I have a funny feeling that we have a good chance of losing this election because of it .
Norman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very much in danger of losing this election to another four years of Donald Trump .
Certainly , what Marcus is saying rings true to me , and this is somebody who ’ s run for office , has been working outside as an activist outside the Democratic Party for decades and also had some toes into it as well .
I think that in terms of party operatives and people very involved and office holders and circles around them , there is this dynamic .
It ’ s interpersonal , it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all sorts of power struggles and so forth .
The broader constituency , though , is just often buffeted by the mass media , the sort of corporate Democratic messaging that comes from a place like MSNBC , which after all is owned by Comcast .
And anybody who thinks that doesn ’ t matter should think about does it matter that Rupert Murdoch has owned Fox ?
Yeah , I think so , in terms of messaging and content .
And then beyond that , historically , if you look back to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ examples of where small , but it turned out significant , parts of the left went third party in a presidential election , and the results of those elections at the presidential level were disastrous .
We ’ re still suffering from eight years of Reagan in the White House .
We ’ re still suffering from eight years of George W. Bush in the White House .
All that is perhaps surprisingly still in place now in 2020 despite just the , in some ways unprecedented in some ways not , horrific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would think that the urgency of evicting Trump from office would just carry forward just a tremendous , if not unanimity at least enormous agreement among vast numbers of progressives at the base that hey , if you ’ re in a swing state , you may not like Biden , you might despise Biden , but we ’ re able to differentiate between Biden and Trump and more broadly between Democratic and Republican president .
Just look at the Supreme Court .
It ’ s empirical .
You don ’ t have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the same time , there ’ s so much revulsion at Biden ’ s record that we do have this uncertainty .
I just sort of sum up by saying that USA Today published a poll a few days ago , 22 % of Bernie Sanders supporters said they ’ re not committed to voting for Biden .
That ought to set off alarm bells in the Biden campaign .
Marc Steiner : Let ’ s pick up that point .
I mean , this is what we just talked about here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were just describing , Norman , the history here of politics in America in the last 50 years , people will say , well look , what do you mean ?
Bill Clinton is the one who started locking up all black and brown people in America .
He ’ s the one who started this neo kind of liberal , conservative bent .
Hillary Clinton , you were for the war in Iraq .
Joe Biden , his record ’ s right there .
And so people are saying , what are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and how do you do it ?
I ’ ll make this very personal .
As I said to you , Norm , before we went on the air , and Marcus , I may have said this to you before , with two of my daughters I ’ m having this conversation .
They ’ re saying , “ I ’ m not sure I can vote for Biden .
I ’ m not sure what to do , ” because of who he represents to them .
The divide is that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well , it gets to the second point , which is about the establishment Democrats fearful of the progressives , which is why they ’ re trying to shut Sanders down and what that could mean .
Let ’ s just take it from the progressive side .
How do you organize that ?
How do you strategically make the argument that you were making to convince people that what we ’ re facing is an abyss ?
Marcus Farrell : I honestly think that we have to make the argument with more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s not on progressives anymore .
The day and age where we ’ re going to blame black people for not showing up to the polls , the day and age we ’ re going to blame progressives for not showing up to the polls when we are seeing messaging that literally says more of nothing , and I ’ m pretty sure we might even get into the black plan that Biden just came out with .
But I mean , are these things enough ?
And to be honest with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is sort of a smug , “ You got to come our direction or you ’ re going to destroy the country ” talking point that is not going to turn out young black voters that aren ’ t super voters in the South , that were a part of the Obama coalition or could be a part of what ’ s considered the Obama coalition .
You ’ re not going to get white progressives who are already saying , “ I ’ m going to sit home or I ’ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you don ’ t address their issues .
So how do you sell it ?
Well , you sell it by adopting the policy .
And listen , one thing that I find interesting is I always hear this from some of my colleagues , moderation and incremental change .
Even moderation and incremental change , when it comes down to progressive policies , the Biden campaign is really not doing that at a level where it should even be considered acceptable .
Lowering Medicare for All from 65 to 60 is not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ progressives who are like , “ How about you just give us Medicare for All , and then maybe we ’ ll bend on college for all right now , maybe we ’ ll bend on some of these things.
” It ’ s not going far enough .
And to be honest with you , when it comes down to black voters , and I ’ m talking about non-super voting African Americans who don ’ t show up in the primary , America , then guess what ?
They ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign , with a candidate that refuses to even acknowledge the reason why their brothers , sisters , uncles , cousins were put in jail .
So I mean , we got a long way to go , and I ’ m hoping that the Biden campaign adjusts , but as of right now the adjustment is not there .
Norman Solomon : Well , I agree with that .
And by the way , RootsAction distributed thousands of flyers in South Carolina before the primary there this year , documenting Biden ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for mass incarceration through his championing of the now notorious crime bill in 1994 .
So when we look , though , at it at the same time , I got to say that after a 40-year record in politics , changing his rhetoric is not going to do a lot .
Even if Biden says he ’ s going to do X , Y , and Z , the fact is , there ’ s only one decision he ’ s going to make between now and November that isn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ easily backtrack on and blow off , and that ’ s the vice presidential pick .
Everything else , like so often has happened when politicians have run for office , they try to pander to the base , and Democrats in office quite often just blow off the base .
Frankly , Clinton and Obama did that to a large extent once they got to the White House .
So a practical progressive will look at Biden and say whatever he puts in his program when he ’ s running is not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be good for him to endorse Medicare for All .
We should pressure him to do that .
It ’ s not our fault as progressives that he ’ s not making the sale .
It ’ s his fault because of his record and the way he ’ s running this really zombie campaign at this point .
I just get back to the fact that the VP pick is very important and that at the end of the day progressives and everybody need to look at what ’ s in it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about him ultimately .
It ’ s about what happens to the people in this country and the suffering that will result if we get another four years of Trump .
Marc Steiner : Quick question for both of you , then I ’ m going to conclude with a larger question .
You mentioned vice president .
Who do you think the vice president should be with Biden ?
Do you have an idea ?
Marcus Farrell : I wrote an article on it in theGrio and everybody attacked me for it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the pick , followed by Warren followed by , as a matter of fact in a tie between second is Warren and Kamala Harris .
First you need a woman , of course , to be honest with you .
This is all about how you decide to slice the apple , right ?
One thing that you need , and the only person that ’ s being considered or throwing their hat out there that has actually turned out black people at a rate almost higher than Barack Obama in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you can motivate a whole black community with the mistakes , because again , I go back to the general election versus the primary .
You ’ re not going to get the same kind of turnout .
We saw this with Hillary Clinton in 2016 .
You ’ re going to need someone who actually understands how to do a couple of things .
The reason why I ’ m behind Stacey so hard is this .
She already has fought against Republican gerrymandering and Republican fights when it comes down to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organization called Fair Fight that literally does the work .
Yes , I used to work for her , but more importantly , I think she ’ s prepared to handle the onslaught of voter suppression tactics that are about to happen come November .
That ’ s pretty much the main reason why you need to have that kind of leadership , and also the Southern turnout of black folks to actually get you across [ inaudible 00:17:30 ] .
Norman Solomon : Yeah , there ’ s no doubt that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inspiring and got the vote out and is a model for what needs to happen with leadership around the country .
There ’ s no doubt that the fight that she has helped lead across the country now against voter suppression and for voting rights has been superb .
I have a question , which is , in December 2018 , Stacy Abrams joined the board of directors of the Center for American Progress , and not only did that but issued a public statement praising the Center for American Progress to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ progressive future .
And she named Neera Tanden , one of the most notorious attackers of Bernie Sanders in Washington , as a model for progressives .
I ’ d love to hear your explanation .
Marcus Farrell : I don ’ t have to have an explanation .
You know the reason why , is because she ’ s a black woman politician .
And I ’ m not sitting up here saying that she ’ s bought , because to be honest with you , there are a bunch of corporate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we start having numbers for black politicians in the South that actually get donations to organizations in the same way that Bernie Sanders has them , then we can have a different conversation .
She endorsed my campaign too , and she might ’ ve been endorsed Neera Tanden , but she also endorsed one of the most progressive African Americans that you will ever meet in my campaign .
So what I ’ ll say is this right here , political expediency might be one thing , but also look at resources @ @ @ @ @ @ @ filling the coffers so you can employ over 200 African Americans in the South to run your campaign .
The notion , because I think the premise of this question is , is she a neoliberal ?
Is she a moderate ?
And to be honest with you , I think she ’ s a pragmatist .
And also , I think that if we ’ re talking about getting Trump out of the office and we already have Joe Biden has pretty much secured the nomination , I want to win an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say , and I will repeat this , black politicians don ’ t get a million $ 2.70 donations to their campaigns .
Black politicians in the South don ’ t get a numerous amount .
So what comes first , the chicken or the egg ?
I ’ m a progressive , but I also understand that funding when you ’ re trying to beat someone like Brian Kemp , when you ’ re trying to beat someone like Jaime Harrison in South Carolina , do we have millions and millions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
No , we got to figure out where the money comes from , and to be honest with you , sometimes these decisions are compromised .
But I ’ d rather look at what a person proposed , and I ’ ve seen Stacey Abrams doing her work , and I ’ m going to back her up because I know for a fact having conversations with her that she would much rather be the progressive candidate that we need and fight for the issues that we need when she gets in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Wall Street .
And I ’ ve never seen her do it before , and none of her actions has she done it , and I don ’ t think she ’ ll do it as vice president .
Norman Solomon : Just so I understand , are you saying you think it was okay for her to praise this notorious anti-progressive Neera Tanden and a notorious anti-progressive organization , Center for American Progress ?
You think under the circumstances that made sense ?
Marcus Farrell : I mean , listen , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the devil ’ s in the detail .
She also endorsed Impact .
She also endorsed the NAACP .
So I mean , here ’ s the thing .
If we ’ re going to take one endorsement from a person , then I can look at a lot of things .
Bernie Sanders didn ’ t put money in black communities in the South when he should have been campaigning there .
Does that make him a racist ?
Norman Solomon : No , I don ’ t want to belabor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guess what I ’ m saying is- Marc Steiner : Let me ask you both a question .
Norman Solomon : I do want to say that this was a superlative praise .
It wasn ’ t just going on the board of directors , it was a superlative praise of Neera Tanden and Center for American Progress .
That ’ s all I ’ m saying .
Marc Steiner : Let me put out this .
I mean , we ’ re not going to resolve this right now , but I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the two of you just had .
So let me conclude with this .
I think that that made me pause when I looked at that , the Center for American Progress .
I remember when that happened .
It also gave me pause when I saw how badly Bernie organized in the black community and just didn ’ t do the work that needed to be done around the country in this campaign .
I think that ’ s very real as well .
And the numbers show that .
So the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ inaudible 00:22:04 ] passion the two of you just had , what does this portend for November ?
I mean , there ’ s already this vibe where 20-some percent of Sanders voters do not want to vote for Biden .
You have the reality that the establishment Democrats are trying to circumvent any power that the Sanders movement might bring to Milwaukee .
And you ’ ve got a real battle over which woman will be the vice presidential candidate .
And if there ’ s also this internal feud even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t want to leave this on a negative note , but I just want to explore this for a minute before we go , which is , where do you think this takes us ?
I ’ ll stop there .
I could riff for hours on this , but I won ’ t now .
Norman Solomon : I think the gist , I ’ m going to speak for myself , is that we ’ ve got to beat Trump , and that doesn ’ t change the fact that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sustained about what corporate Democrats and the DNC and , as Marcus pointed out , so many local , regional , state Democratic parties have continued to do , which is to entrench the already entrenched and to lock out those who are already locked out .
I think it ’ s a dual struggle , and yes , there ’ s divisions among progressives , but I hope that we can wage those battles at the same time .
Marcus Farrell : I think that defeating Trump is the number one answer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have the most strategic way of beating Trump as possible .
I think that there ’ s two routes to take .
I think that there ’ s a white progressive route , I think that there is a black Midwestern and Southern turnout route .
And I also think that it doesn ’ t have to be a either-or .
It could a both if the Biden campaign decided to make the decisions policy-wise and also make it easy for Elizabeth Warren to come onboard and produce her economic solutions for America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to come onboard and say , “ We ’ re going to engage African Americans in the way that you ’ ve never done before , DNC.
” Because me and Norman just had a back and forth , and I want to acknowledge this .
That ’ s a good back and forth , right ?
And if we don ’ t have these conversations , then the problem is , is that the Biden campaign is just going to say , “ You know what ?
Let ’ s get a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Let ’ s go from there.
” And then we have a serious problem and Trump gets elected for the next four years , because Trump is not going to care , right ?
I ’ m very careful about our conversations during this moment right now , and if we don ’ t have them , I think it ’ s going to be a problem .
So I mean , the way we solve it is we keep yelling at each other on our side to make sure that we project @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need certain things .
Marc Steiner : I think this is an important conversation , and what I ’ d like to end with is that this should be the beginning of a series of conversations we ’ re doing on Real News to really help develop this and be part of that strategy to figure out how we respond to what we ’ re facing and not to allow the white supremacist mob that loves Trump and the neoconservative establishment elite who ’ s transforming our government by making all the court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a hugely important time for us .
I want to thank you both , Norm Solomon and Marcus Farrell , both for the work you ’ ve done in trying to change our society for the better and joining us here on The Real News .
Let ’ s pick this conversation up together in about a week and see where we are and keep on going and get some other people in the conversation so we can really push this out there and make something positive happen .
I appreciate both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Solomon : Hey , thanks to you both .
Marcus Farrell : Thank you , guys .
Appreciate you all .
Marc Steiner : As always .
And I ’ m Marc Steiner here for The Real News Network .
I really want to hear what you think , so write to us , let us know what you think , what do you think about this general campaign , where it should be going ?
Want to hear your ideas .
We can incorporate them in upcoming episodes and conversations and videos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us know .
And stay home , stay safe , stay healthy .
I ’ m Marc Steiner here for The Real News Network .
Take care .

Before the ruling was announced, TRNN spoke with Norman Solomon and Marcus Ferrell about how the split between establishment Democrats and progressives could help hand Trump the November election.
Story Transcript
This interview was recorded prior to the ruling reinstating Bernie Sanders on the New York primary election ballot.
This is a rush transcript and may contain errors. It will be updated.
Marc Steiner: Welcome to The Real News. I’m Marc Steiner. Good to have you all with us. New York has canceled its primary election, forcing Bernie Sanders’ name off the ballot. Sanders in a statement has called this a blow to democracy. And California seems to be changing the rules, and even though Sanders won the vote, he may not get the majority of the delegates to the convention in Milwaukee. Part of the Sanders strategy was to have a huge delegate presence to push the progressive agenda, which is popular with most Democrats and Americans in general. How might this affect the November election? Will this rift widen between Biden and Sanders, between the establishment Democrats and the progressives? In the midst of this pandemic so badly handled by Trump, are Democrats with little effective public response and feuding internally handing this election right over to the right wing to transform our country?
Well, we’re going to talk about that. We’re joined by Norman Solomon. He was co-founder and national coordinator of RootsAction.org, the founder and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy, and Marcus Farrell, former African American outreach director for Bernie Sanders in 2016, former deputy campaign manager for Stacey Abrams, former chief of staff of the New Georgia Project, and currently a political consultant and now becoming a frequent guest like Norman on The Real News. Good to have you both with us. Welcome.
Norman Solomon: Hey, thank you.
Marcus Farrell: Nice to be here.
Marc Steiner: Let me start, Norman, with you since you’re in California where some of the latest news came out. What the hell is happening here? I mean, what do you think the dynamic is going on, both of you, that New York has canceled its election and California is debating on what’s counted in the delegates. Politically, what do you think is going on internally?
Norman Solomon: Well, the way it rolls out with delegates is very murky, but I think it comes under the general heading of the victor gets the spoils. And so while in the last month since Bernie Sanders suspended his campaign, there’s been quite a few pats on the head from Joe Biden and rhetorical flourishes in a progressive direction, we’re pretty much having a consolidation of control over the prospective nomination from the Biden forces and those economic and political powers that he represents. It’s really a time of churning, of turmoil, and I think a lot of progressives are trying to find new footing over this new terrain.
And just to sort of sum up, we have as usual, but with a heightened acuity, this dual responsibility to fight the right wing, the racists, the misogynists, the nativists, and so forth, so ably represented and viciously implemented by the Trump administration. And on the other hand, to really fight for and advance a progressive agenda, which requires combat, nonviolent but vehement combat, with corporate Democrats. I think a lot of progressives are looking for the best ways forward to thread both of those needles at the same time.
Marc Steiner: Marcus, how do you read this? You’ve been in the middle of all of this, this campaign for a while.
Marcus Farrell: Listen, when they talk about voting in the presidential election, one thing that folks typically bring up is how you need to vote down-ballot. I compare voting down-ballot also to being involved in local and state parties also, right? People think it’s only the DNC that might have sort of an agenda to make sure that progressives don’t have their voice heard. It’s more than just the DNC. It goes all the way down to your city party. There are people in this country who are Democrats, who fundamentally hate the idea of a progressive America. Half of them don’t even know why they hate the idea of a progressive America. It’s more so a cult of personality, and our friends are our friends and your friends aren’t your friends. If you supported Bernie Sanders in 2016 and 2020, that means that you’re a bad person.
So we have to fight to make sure that our down-ballot down-statewide parties are infiltrated by progressive people to make sure that there are fair actions across the board. This is a muting of a progressive platform and, and it’s a very obvious thing that when Milwaukee comes around, and hopefully Milwaukee doesn’t come around, hopefully they do something virtually because I don’t want you all bringing you all coronavirus-having asses to a black city and giving more of my people your little whatever you got, right? But when that moment happens, this is to make sure that the numbers and the pressure is not there.
What we’re seeing is as a progressive, and I’ll speak as a black progressive, what we’re seeing is a dual phase approach to subvert voters. First you have the DNC subverting, I guess not the DNC but powers that be, subverting the will of more progressive folks. And you also have a Trump administration who’s opening up the country right now at the same time, to aggressively almost attack black and brown communities who they know are going to show up in droves in November. So it’s a very interesting place.
Marc Steiner: It is. So let me take it from that point that both of you just said. I’ve just read on the news before we went on the air together here that Trump is looking to end his coronavirus task force by sometime in May, at the end of May. And the way this administration has handled this pandemic has been absurd. It’s been like a clown show, except for the few people around him like Fauci and others were at least trying to do something to stem the tide of this pandemic. Given that, and given the polls that show many Americans, most Americans are just fed up with Trump at a larger scale. They call themselves moderates, liberals, or libertarians or on the left, whoever they are. But it seems to me that what’s under this internal feud that allows this moment that could take down the right wing to be divided so that they actually can win a victory, because people get so internally divided that you cannot win an election.
Marcus Farrell: Pride and ego.
Marc Steiner: Pardon?
Marcus Farrell: Pride and ego. I mean, let’s start there. We want to win the way that we want to win. We want to bring it back to normal so our donors can start getting their money across and we can continue to do things like neglected progressive voices. So the question is, do we want to have common sense as a Democratic Party? I’m a 20-year Democrat, I’m a Southern black voter, I live in Atlanta, Georgia right now. And if you look around, and the state just dropped a poll I think last week saying that over 60% of people in the state actually think that the governor’s handling of the coronavirus is bad. And that’s the same thing with the American polls when it comes down to Donald Trump.
But the internal divide comes from a place of, we still fundamentally want capitalism to happen after this is over with. We just want our brand of it. And at the end of the day, it’s as simple as it can get. It’s an unfortunate place, because I have a funny feeling that we have a good chance of losing this election because of it.
Norman Solomon: Well, we’re very much in danger of losing this election to another four years of Donald Trump. Certainly, what Marcus is saying rings true to me, and this is somebody who’s run for office, has been working outside as an activist outside the Democratic Party for decades and also had some toes into it as well. I think that in terms of party operatives and people very involved and office holders and circles around them, there is this dynamic. It’s interpersonal, it’s like a bad high school and all sorts of power struggles and so forth. The broader constituency, though, is just often buffeted by the mass media, the sort of corporate Democratic messaging that comes from a place like MSNBC, which after all is owned by Comcast. And anybody who thinks that doesn’t matter should think about does it matter that Rupert Murdoch has owned Fox? Yeah, I think so, in terms of messaging and content.
And then beyond that, historically, if you look back to 1980 or 2000, we have other examples of where small, but it turned out significant, parts of the left went third party in a presidential election, and the results of those elections at the presidential level were disastrous. We’re still suffering from eight years of Reagan in the White House. We’re still suffering from eight years of George W. Bush in the White House. All that is perhaps surprisingly still in place now in 2020 despite just the, in some ways unprecedented in some ways not, horrific characteristics of the Trump presidency.
One would think that the urgency of evicting Trump from office would just carry forward just a tremendous, if not unanimity at least enormous agreement among vast numbers of progressives at the base that hey, if you’re in a swing state, you may not like Biden, you might despise Biden, but we’re able to differentiate between Biden and Trump and more broadly between Democratic and Republican president. Just look at the Supreme Court. It’s empirical. You don’t have to theorize about it.
And so at the same time, there’s so much revulsion at Biden’s record that we do have this uncertainty. I just sort of sum up by saying that USA Today published a poll a few days ago, 22% of Bernie Sanders supporters said they’re not committed to voting for Biden. That ought to set off alarm bells in the Biden campaign.
Marc Steiner: Let’s pick up that point. I mean, this is what we just talked about here. If you look at what you were just describing, Norman, the history here of politics in America in the last 50 years, people will say, well look, what do you mean? Bill Clinton is the one who started locking up all black and brown people in America. He’s the one who started this neo kind of liberal, conservative bent. Hillary Clinton, you were for the war in Iraq. Joe Biden, his record’s right there. And so people are saying, what are you trying to convince me of here and how do you do it? I’ll make this very personal. As I said to you, Norm, before we went on the air, and Marcus, I may have said this to you before, with two of my daughters I’m having this conversation. They’re saying, “I’m not sure I can vote for Biden. I’m not sure what to do,” because of who he represents to them. The divide is that deep.
And then you have, well, it gets to the second point, which is about the establishment Democrats fearful of the progressives, which is why they’re trying to shut Sanders down and what that could mean. Let’s just take it from the progressive side. How do you organize that? How do you strategically make the argument that you were making to convince people that what we’re facing is an abyss?
Marcus Farrell: I honestly think that we have to make the argument with more pressure on the Biden campaign. It’s not on progressives anymore. The day and age where we’re going to blame black people for not showing up to the polls, the day and age we’re going to blame progressives for not showing up to the polls when we are seeing messaging that literally says more of nothing, and I’m pretty sure we might even get into the black plan that Biden just came out with. But I mean, are these things enough? And to be honest with you, what we see right now is sort of a smug, “You got to come our direction or you’re going to destroy the country” talking point that is not going to turn out young black voters that aren’t super voters in the South, that were a part of the Obama coalition or could be a part of what’s considered the Obama coalition.
You’re not going to get white progressives who are already saying, “I’m going to sit home or I’m going to vote third party” if you don’t address their issues. So how do you sell it? Well, you sell it by adopting the policy. And listen, one thing that I find interesting is I always hear this from some of my colleagues, moderation and incremental change. Even moderation and incremental change, when it comes down to progressive policies, the Biden campaign is really not doing that at a level where it should even be considered acceptable. Lowering Medicare for All from 65 to 60 is not going to get that 20% of progressives who are like, “How about you just give us Medicare for All, and then maybe we’ll bend on college for all right now, maybe we’ll bend on some of these things.” It’s not going far enough.
And to be honest with you, when it comes down to black voters, and I’m talking about non-super voting African Americans who don’t show up in the primary, America, then guess what? They’re not going to be impressed with a campaign, with a candidate that refuses to even acknowledge the reason why their brothers, sisters, uncles, cousins were put in jail. So I mean, we got a long way to go, and I’m hoping that the Biden campaign adjusts, but as of right now the adjustment is not there.
Norman Solomon: Well, I agree with that. And by the way, RootsAction distributed thousands of flyers in South Carolina before the primary there this year, documenting Biden’s record in helping pave the way for mass incarceration through his championing of the now notorious crime bill in 1994. So when we look, though, at it at the same time, I got to say that after a 40-year record in politics, changing his rhetoric is not going to do a lot. Even if Biden says he’s going to do X, Y, and Z, the fact is, there’s only one decision he’s going to make between now and November that isn’t reversible and that he couldn’t easily backtrack on and blow off, and that’s the vice presidential pick. Everything else, like so often has happened when politicians have run for office, they try to pander to the base, and Democrats in office quite often just blow off the base. Frankly, Clinton and Obama did that to a large extent once they got to the White House.
So a practical progressive will look at Biden and say whatever he puts in his program when he’s running is not too convincing. I agree it would be good for him to endorse Medicare for All. We should pressure him to do that. It’s not our fault as progressives that he’s not making the sale. It’s his fault because of his record and the way he’s running this really zombie campaign at this point. I just get back to the fact that the VP pick is very important and that at the end of the day progressives and everybody need to look at what’s in it for us. It’s not about him ultimately. It’s about what happens to the people in this country and the suffering that will result if we get another four years of Trump.
Marc Steiner: Quick question for both of you, then I’m going to conclude with a larger question. You mentioned vice president. Who do you think the vice president should be with Biden? Do you have an idea?
Marcus Farrell: I wrote an article on it in theGrio and everybody attacked me for it. I believe strongly that Stacey Abrams is the pick, followed by Warren followed by, as a matter of fact in a tie between second is Warren and Kamala Harris. First you need a woman, of course, to be honest with you. This is all about how you decide to slice the apple, right? One thing that you need, and the only person that’s being considered or throwing their hat out there that has actually turned out black people at a rate almost higher than Barack Obama in the South is Stacey Abrams. And also you can motivate a whole black community with the mistakes, because again, I go back to the general election versus the primary. You’re not going to get the same kind of turnout. We saw this with Hillary Clinton in 2016.
You’re going to need someone who actually understands how to do a couple of things. The reason why I’m behind Stacey so hard is this. She already has fought against Republican gerrymandering and Republican fights when it comes down to protecting the vote. She has a organization called Fair Fight that literally does the work. Yes, I used to work for her, but more importantly, I think she’s prepared to handle the onslaught of voter suppression tactics that are about to happen come November. That’s pretty much the main reason why you need to have that kind of leadership, and also the Southern turnout of black folks to actually get you across [inaudible 00:17:30] .
Marc Steiner: Norman?
Norman Solomon: Yeah, there’s no doubt that the gubernatorial campaign that Stacey Abrams ran was inspiring and got the vote out and is a model for what needs to happen with leadership around the country. There’s no doubt that the fight that she has helped lead across the country now against voter suppression and for voting rights has been superb. I have a question, which is, in December 2018, Stacy Abrams joined the board of directors of the Center for American Progress, and not only did that but issued a public statement praising the Center for American Progress to the skies as a wonderful leader for a progressive future. And she named Neera Tanden, one of the most notorious attackers of Bernie Sanders in Washington, as a model for progressives. I’d love to hear your explanation.
Marcus Farrell: I don’t have to have an explanation. You know the reason why, is because she’s a black woman politician. And I’m not sitting up here saying that she’s bought, because to be honest with you, there are a bunch of corporate interests folks that happened. Now once we start having numbers for black politicians in the South that actually get donations to organizations in the same way that Bernie Sanders has them, then we can have a different conversation. She endorsed my campaign too, and she might’ve been endorsed Neera Tanden, but she also endorsed one of the most progressive African Americans that you will ever meet in my campaign.
So what I’ll say is this right here, political expediency might be one thing, but also look at resources, look at actually who’s filling the coffers so you can employ over 200 African Americans in the South to run your campaign. The notion, because I think the premise of this question is, is she a neoliberal? Is she a moderate? And to be honest with you, I think she’s a pragmatist. And also, I think that if we’re talking about getting Trump out of the office and we already have Joe Biden has pretty much secured the nomination, I want to win an election.
The last thing I will say, and I will repeat this, black politicians don’t get a million $2.70 donations to their campaigns. Black politicians in the South don’t get a numerous amount. So what comes first, the chicken or the egg? I’m a progressive, but I also understand that funding when you’re trying to beat someone like Brian Kemp, when you’re trying to beat someone like Jaime Harrison in South Carolina, do we have millions and millions of people who are giving small dollar donations? No, we got to figure out where the money comes from, and to be honest with you, sometimes these decisions are compromised.
But I’d rather look at what a person proposed, and I’ve seen Stacey Abrams doing her work, and I’m going to back her up because I know for a fact having conversations with her that she would much rather be the progressive candidate that we need and fight for the issues that we need when she gets in, instead of being someone who kowtows to Wall Street. And I’ve never seen her do it before, and none of her actions has she done it, and I don’t think she’ll do it as vice president.
Norman Solomon: Just so I understand, are you saying you think it was okay for her to praise this notorious anti-progressive Neera Tanden and a notorious anti-progressive organization, Center for American Progress? You think under the circumstances that made sense?
Marcus Farrell: I mean, listen, if we’re looking for perfection, the devil’s in the detail. She also endorsed Impact. She also endorsed the NAACP. So I mean, here’s the thing. If we’re going to take one endorsement from a person, then I can look at a lot of things. Bernie Sanders didn’t put money in black communities in the South when he should have been campaigning there. Does that make him a racist?
Norman Solomon: No, I don’t want to belabor the point.
Marcus Farrell: I guess what I’m saying is-
Marc Steiner: Let me ask you both a question.
Norman Solomon: I do want to say that this was a superlative praise. It wasn’t just going on the board of directors, it was a superlative praise of Neera Tanden and Center for American Progress. That’s all I’m saying.
Marc Steiner: Let me put out this. I mean, we’re not going to resolve this right now, but I think it’s an important dialogue the two of you just had. So let me conclude with this. I think that that made me pause when I looked at that, the Center for American Progress. I remember when that happened. It also gave me pause when I saw how badly Bernie organized in the black community and just didn’t do the work that needed to be done around the country in this campaign. I think that’s very real as well. And the numbers show that. So the question is, in terms of the [inaudible 00:22:04] passion the two of you just had, what does this portend for November?
I mean, there’s already this vibe where 20-some percent of Sanders voters do not want to vote for Biden. You have the reality that the establishment Democrats are trying to circumvent any power that the Sanders movement might bring to Milwaukee. And you’ve got a real battle over which woman will be the vice presidential candidate. And if there’s also this internal feud even among progressions around this, I don’t want to leave this on a negative note, but I just want to explore this for a minute before we go, which is, where do you think this takes us? I’ll stop there. I could riff for hours on this, but I won’t now.
Norman Solomon: I think the gist, I’m going to speak for myself, is that we’ve got to beat Trump, and that doesn’t change the fact that there is a critique that must be sustained about what corporate Democrats and the DNC and, as Marcus pointed out, so many local, regional, state Democratic parties have continued to do, which is to entrench the already entrenched and to lock out those who are already locked out. I think it’s a dual struggle, and yes, there’s divisions among progressives, but I hope that we can wage those battles at the same time.
Marc Steiner: Marcus, quickly, what’s your thinking?
Marcus Farrell: I think that defeating Trump is the number one answer. I think that we need to have the most strategic way of beating Trump as possible. I think that there’s two routes to take. I think that there’s a white progressive route, I think that there is a black Midwestern and Southern turnout route. And I also think that it doesn’t have to be a either-or. It could a both if the Biden campaign decided to make the decisions policy-wise and also make it easy for Elizabeth Warren to come onboard and produce her economic solutions for America. Make it easy for Stacey Abrams to come onboard and say, “We’re going to engage African Americans in the way that you’ve never done before, DNC.” Because me and Norman just had a back and forth, and I want to acknowledge this. That’s a good back and forth, right?
And if we don’t have these conversations, then the problem is, is that the Biden campaign is just going to say, “You know what? Let’s get a moderate white man from the Midwest. Let’s go from there.” And then we have a serious problem and Trump gets elected for the next four years, because Trump is not going to care, right? I’m very careful about our conversations during this moment right now, and if we don’t have them, I think it’s going to be a problem. So I mean, the way we solve it is we keep yelling at each other on our side to make sure that we project together to the Biden campaign that we need certain things.
Norman Solomon: That’s right, yeah.
Marc Steiner: I think this is an important conversation, and what I’d like to end with is that this should be the beginning of a series of conversations we’re doing on Real News to really help develop this and be part of that strategy to figure out how we respond to what we’re facing and not to allow the white supremacist mob that loves Trump and the neoconservative establishment elite who’s transforming our government by making all the court judges and everything else. So this is a hugely important time for us. I want to thank you both, Norm Solomon and Marcus Farrell, both for the work you’ve done in trying to change our society for the better and joining us here on The Real News. Let’s pick this conversation up together in about a week and see where we are and keep on going and get some other people in the conversation so we can really push this out there and make something positive happen. I appreciate both your time and your work.
Norman Solomon: Hey, thanks to you both.
Marcus Farrell: Thank you, guys. Appreciate you all.
Marc Steiner: As always. And I’m Marc Steiner here for The Real News Network. I really want to hear what you think, so write to us, let us know what you think, what do you think about this general campaign, where it should be going? Want to hear your ideas. We can incorporate them in upcoming episodes and conversations and videos that we produce, so please let us know. And stay home, stay safe, stay healthy. I’m Marc Steiner here for The Real News Network. Take care.
Production: Genevieve Montinar, Bababtunde Ogunfolaju, Andrew Corkery
Studio: Bababtunde Ogunfolaju
Related
Republish This Story Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.