sluggerotoole--2020-06-25--“Anyone who planted a bomb, shot and attacked security services or members of the public cannot be a

“Anyone who planted a bomb, shot and attacked security services or members of the public cannot be a victim…”

I ’ m publishing this whole because it puts the controversy over troubles pensions into perspective .
South Belfast UPRG ( and the UDA in that area ) , makes clear that former Loyalist terrorists will not be applying for the money .
They seem to have outmaneuvered Sinn Féin leaving them the only party arguing in favour of pensions for old terrorists , as of right .
The so-called “ Troubles ” claimed more than 3,500 lives and the Northern Ireland Office has estimated that another 40,000 people were injured.No one can underestimate the emotional and physical trauma that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this time .
It is a matter of public record that the Combined Loyalist Military Command ( CLMC ) has stated that ; ” In all sincerity , we offer to the loved ones of all innocent victims over the past twenty-five years , abject and true remorse .
No words of ours will compensate for the intolerable suffering they have undergone during the conflict ” .
With that said we will comment on the pension scheme in the belief that we will not be nor would we ever be an impediment to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the scheme is to ‘ acknowledge the harm suffered by those injured in the Troubles , and promote reconciliation between people in connection with Northern Ireland ’ s troubled past ’ ( Regulation 5 ( 6 ) ) .
The Board will be guided by principles on the need to be responsive to and prioritise victims ’ needs , to be transparent and communicate effectively , the Scheme to be simple to navigate , applications to be determined without delay , and for personal data to be handled sensitively ( Reg .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ demonstrate that their injury is a result of being present at a Troubles-related incident ( determined by the Board ) , present in the immediate aftermath of a Troubles-related incident in which a loved one died or suffered an injury , responding , in the course of employment to a Troubles-related incident , in which the person reasonably believed a loved one had died or suffered significant injury ( Reg .
7 ) .
A loved one includes those married , in civil partnership or cohabitating for over two years .
These contributing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sensible and can be agreed by all .
The most explicit exclusion is for those with relevant convictions that were as a result of ‘ conduct which caused , wholly or in part ’ with the incident they were seriously injured in .
A relevant conviction are those which have been spent or unspent and excluded under the Rehabilitation of Offenders ( Northern Ireland ) Order 1978 , i.e .
longer than thirty months or life sentences .
While in the first instance this will exclude those convicted for being involved in instances @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also has a wider scope for the Board to exclude those with any relevant conviction ( not related to the injury ) if it would be inappropriate to award them the victims ’ payment ( Reg .
6 ) .
A review panel within the Board can re-examine a decision to exclude an applicant with a relevant conviction thus , in theory , anyone can apply and present evidence to the board ( at appeal ) that they believe counteracts against a refusal to grant them a suitable award .
Whilst we would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suffering to innocent victims refrain from applying for a pension on the scheme the regulations do allow for such applications .
From a Loyalist perspective , we do not envisage many ( or for that matter any ) applications from those who were adjudged ( in law ) to have committed crimes that would exclude them from applying .
The current furore around the scheme is one created by Sinn Fein who would seek to conflate and confuse people around the notion of what constitutes a ‘ victim ’ .
We are very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a bomb , shot and attacked security services or members of the public and who ( in that process of committing those acts ) were injured can not claim to be a victim .
This is clear in a moral sense and we would submit it to be clear in a legal sense .
All delays in delivering pensions to victims is a further insult to them and adds to their suffering .
Those living with the consequences of serious injury do so with a constant reminder of those dark days in our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ physical but a significant number of survivors also continue to suffer from deep psychological trauma .
It is , therefore , not surprising that many struggle with normal daily routine tasks , and are struggling to cope financially .
We have great empathy and understanding of the emotional impact and debilitating effect that those who suffered are experiencing to this very day .
To further delay the pension scheme in an attempt by Sinn Fein to rewrite history and in some way justify the IRA murder campaign is outrageous and deeply offensive .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ scheme for victims and accept that the definitions and application criteria for the scheme is fair and proportionate .
We would vigorously encourage all political parties to reach rapid agreement and move this scheme forward .
We would also urge the United Kingdom government to roll out this scheme without delay and reject the constant delaying tactics of Sinn Fein , who remain a barrier to a resolution of this matter .

I’m publishing this whole because it puts the controversy over troubles pensions into perspective. South Belfast UPRG (and the UDA in that area), makes clear that former Loyalist terrorists will not be applying for the money.
They seem to have outmaneuvered Sinn Féin leaving them the only party arguing in favour of pensions for old terrorists, as of right.
The so-called “Troubles” claimed more than 3,500 lives and the Northern Ireland Office has estimated that another 40,000 people were injured.No one can underestimate the emotional and physical trauma that was inflicted on completely innocent citizens during this time.
It is a matter of public record that the Combined Loyalist Military Command (CLMC) has stated that; ”In all sincerity, we offer to the loved ones of all innocent victims over the past twenty-five years, abject and true remorse. No words of ours will compensate for the intolerable suffering they have undergone during the conflict”. With that said we will comment on the pension scheme in the belief that we will not be nor would we ever be an impediment to securing pensions to victims.
The purpose of the scheme is to ‘acknowledge the harm suffered by those injured in the Troubles, and promote reconciliation between people in connection with Northern Ireland’s troubled past’ (Regulation 5(6)). The Board will be guided by principles on the need to be responsive to and prioritise victims’ needs, to be transparent and communicate effectively, the Scheme to be simple to navigate, applications to be determined without delay, and for personal data to be handled sensitively (Reg. 4).
Individuals will have to demonstrate that their injury is a result of being present at a Troubles-related incident (determined by the Board), present in the immediate aftermath of a Troubles-related incident in which a loved one died or suffered an injury, responding, in the course of employment to a Troubles-related incident, in which the person reasonably believed a loved one had died or suffered significant injury (Reg. 7). A loved one includes those married, in civil partnership or cohabitating for over two years. These contributing factors to obtaining a pension are surely sensible and can be agreed by all.
The most explicit exclusion is for those with relevant convictions that were as a result of ‘conduct which caused, wholly or in part’ with the incident they were seriously injured in. A relevant conviction are those which have been spent or unspent and excluded under the Rehabilitation of Offenders (Northern Ireland) Order 1978, i.e. longer than thirty months or life sentences.
While in the first instance this will exclude those convicted for being involved in instances that they were injured in, it also has a wider scope for the Board to exclude those with any relevant conviction (not related to the injury) if it would be inappropriate to award them the victims’ payment (Reg. 6).
A review panel within the Board can re-examine a decision to exclude an applicant with a relevant conviction thus, in theory, anyone can apply and present evidence to the board (at appeal) that they believe counteracts against a refusal to grant them a suitable award. Whilst we would prefer that those who inflicted harm or suffering to innocent victims refrain from applying for a pension on the scheme the regulations do allow for such applications.
From a Loyalist perspective, we do not envisage many (or for that matter any) applications from those who were adjudged (in law) to have committed crimes that would exclude them from applying. The current furore around the scheme is one created by Sinn Fein who would seek to conflate and confuse people around the notion of what constitutes a ‘victim’. We are very clear about this.
Anyone who planted a bomb, shot and attacked security services or members of the public and who (in that process of committing those acts) were injured cannot claim to be a victim. This is clear in a moral sense and we would submit it to be clear in a legal sense. All delays in delivering pensions to victims is a further insult to them and adds to their suffering.
Those living with the consequences of serious injury do so with a constant reminder of those dark days in our history. Many of their injuries are physical but a significant number of survivors also continue to suffer from deep psychological trauma. It is, therefore, not surprising that many struggle with normal daily routine tasks, and are struggling to cope financially.
We have great empathy and understanding of the emotional impact and debilitating effect that those who suffered are experiencing to this very day. To further delay the pension scheme in an attempt by Sinn Fein to rewrite history and in some way justify the IRA murder campaign is outrageous and deeply offensive.
In conclusion, we support a pension scheme for victims and accept that the definitions and application criteria for the scheme is fair and proportionate. We would vigorously encourage all political parties to reach rapid agreement and move this scheme forward.
We would also urge the United Kingdom government to roll out this scheme without delay and reject the constant delaying tactics of Sinn Fein, who remain a barrier to a resolution of this matter.


sluggerotoole--2020-06-26--Is less medicine a bad thing?

Is less medicine a bad thing?

Medical consultants are anxious that too few acute medical cases are being reported at A & E departments during the on-going crisis .
This they claim predicts a potential surge in morbidity and mortality from diseases such as ; heart disease , lung disease , mental illness and cancers , once Covid-19 is dealt with .
It seems a logical conclusion given that there was , for example , in one Health Trust , a 33 % reduction in reported heart attacks in March and April .
Consultants reason that people are having the same number of heart events as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ due to fears of entering the health system .
GP ’ s too are concerned .
In an open letter to Robin Swann published in the Irish News they say it is time to get back to normal .
Too many patients , they claim , have been denied , or have been afraid , to access care over the past three months .
How many additional deaths are we willing to accept ?
they ponder .
With the unknowns in February and March it was right to shut the Health Service down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as Covid-19 free as possible .
It was also right to transform it to manage an unknown surge of very ill patients .
But things have moved on .
The SARS-CoV-2 virus is a killer but not on the biblical scale predicted ; remember the 14,000 deaths Robin Swan announced ?
Rather than be swamped , our main hospitals have been eerily quiet , the Nightingale hospitals were not really used and the Covid Centres- set up to deal with community based covid-19 cases – on reflection were surplus to requirements and should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apparent in mid-April .
Sandeep Janhur , a US cardiologist writing in the New York Times is relaxed about the public ’ s lack of access to American healthcare over recent months suggesting that in the round this might be a good thing .
He identifies a recent survey which shows that where most citizens had less contact with healthcare during the pandemic only 10 % felt their condition had got worse .
American healthcare is wasteful and Janhur suggests that up to 30 % of American healthcare provided is unnecessary .
Unsurprisingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ colleagues accusing him of endangering patients .
Off course this is an old argument raised first by Ivan Illich in his book Limits of Medicine back in the 1970s and it ’ s a theme we keep coming back to .
Richard Smith when editor of the BMJ had a themed edition of the magazine on this topic and produced , with medical journalist Ray Moynihan , an excellent editorial “ Too Much Medicine ?
” .
This explored the limits of medicine but also the vested interests of the medical professions and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even more interventions .
When doctors go on strike , fewer people die .
In 1973 doctors in Israel staged a month-long strike and during that month , mortality fell by 50 percent .
A couple of years later , a two-month work stoppage by doctors in the Columbian capital of Bogotá led to a 35 percent decline in deaths .
And during a “ work slowdown ” by doctors in Los Angeles protesting against the sharp increase in premiums for liability insurance , the number of deaths fell by 18 percent .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ were back at work full-time , mortality immediately jumped back to the previous level .
Medical interventions are not without risk .
Every year , 1.2 million of us across the UK are hospitalized as a result of improper medical care .
In the United States – where 40,000 people are shot dead each year – the chance of getting “ killed ” by a doctor is three times greater than being killed by a gun .
And every year significantly more people die from an infection sustained while in the hospital than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Covid-19 crisis has reminded us of the significant limitation of medical interventions and the real importance of public health .
Over the past 50 years the public has been willingly lulled into a false sense of security that when they get ill there will always be a cure or a treatment to save them .
When official medical support is removed such as happened in Israel and Columbia and more recently across the World due to Covid-19 , people seem to take more responsibility for their own health and this may result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be some time before the true health impact of the last three months becomes clear .
What is already clear is that a stronger focus on self-care and disease prevention should be a greater feature of the future of our health service and of course this is exactly what Professor Rafael Bengoa prescribed for us but it is a medicine our politicians up to now seem less willing to swallow .
Photo by DarkoStojanovic is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA

Medical consultants are anxious that too few acute medical cases are being reported at A&E departments during the on-going crisis. This they claim predicts a potential surge in morbidity and mortality from diseases such as; heart disease, lung disease, mental illness and cancers, once Covid-19 is dealt with. It seems a logical conclusion given that there was, for example, in one Health Trust, a 33% reduction in reported heart attacks in March and April. Consultants reason that people are having the same number of heart events as in previous years but simply not reporting due to fears of entering the health system.
GP’s too are concerned. In an open letter to Robin Swann published in the Irish News they say it is time to get back to normal. Too many patients, they claim, have been denied, or have been afraid, to access care over the past three months. How many additional deaths are we willing to accept? they ponder. With the unknowns in February and March it was right to shut the Health Service down and keep our hospitals and general practices as Covid-19 free as possible. It was also right to transform it to manage an unknown surge of very ill patients. But things have moved on. The SARS-CoV-2 virus is a killer but not on the biblical scale predicted; remember the 14,000 deaths Robin Swan announced? Rather than be swamped, our main hospitals have been eerily quiet, the Nightingale hospitals were not really used and the Covid Centres- set up to deal with community based covid-19 cases – on reflection were surplus to requirements and should have been stood down when that became apparent in mid-April.
Sandeep Janhur, a US cardiologist writing in the New York Times is relaxed about the public’s lack of access to American healthcare over recent months suggesting that in the round this might be a good thing. He identifies a recent survey which shows that where most citizens had less contact with healthcare during the pandemic only 10% felt their condition had got worse. American healthcare is wasteful and Janhur suggests that up to 30% of American healthcare provided is unnecessary. Unsurprisingly there was a quick response from his colleagues accusing him of endangering patients.
Off course this is an old argument raised first by Ivan Illich in his book Limits of Medicine back in the 1970s and it’s a theme we keep coming back to. Richard Smith when editor of the BMJ had a themed edition of the magazine on this topic and produced, with medical journalist Ray Moynihan, an excellent editorial “Too Much Medicine?”. This explored the limits of medicine but also the vested interests of the medical professions and pharmaceutical industry through the benefits derived from even more interventions.
When doctors go on strike, fewer people die. In 1973 doctors in Israel staged a month-long strike and during that month, mortality fell by 50 percent. A couple of years later, a two-month work stoppage by doctors in the Columbian capital of Bogotá led to a 35 percent decline in deaths. And during a “work slowdown” by doctors in Los Angeles protesting against the sharp increase in premiums for liability insurance, the number of deaths fell by 18 percent. The worrying thing is that once doctors were back at work full-time, mortality immediately jumped back to the previous level.
Medical interventions are not without risk. Every year, 1.2 million of us across the UK are hospitalized as a result of improper medical care. In the United States – where 40,000 people are shot dead each year – the chance of getting “killed” by a doctor is three times greater than being killed by a gun. And every year significantly more people die from an infection sustained while in the hospital than as a result of traffic accidents.
The Covid-19 crisis has reminded us of the significant limitation of medical interventions and the real importance of public health. Over the past 50 years the public has been willingly lulled into a false sense of security that when they get ill there will always be a cure or a treatment to save them. When official medical support is removed such as happened in Israel and Columbia and more recently across the World due to Covid-19, people seem to take more responsibility for their own health and this may result in better health outcomes.
It will be some time before the true health impact of the last three months becomes clear. What is already clear is that a stronger focus on self-care and disease prevention should be a greater feature of the future of our health service and of course this is exactly what Professor Rafael Bengoa prescribed for us but it is a medicine our politicians up to now seem less willing to swallow.
Photo by DarkoStojanovic is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA


New Cabinet announced

Here is the full list “ Dáil Éireann ” by justinpickard is licensed under CC BY-SA

Donate to keep Slugger lit!
For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.
Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger.
While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.
If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.


sluggerotoole--2020-06-27--Micheál Martin elected as the 15th Taoiseach…

Micheál Martin is a lesson in having patience .
If you hang around long enough and play the long game you eventually get the top job .
The Corkman is not exactly the most exciting politician but maybe a steady hand on the tiller is exactly what Ireland needs in these turbulent times .
With the Greens acting as a buffer in a historic coalition with their old enemy of Fine Gael , it will be interesting to see how it all holds together .
Never has the Benjamin Franklin phrase , ‘ We must , indeed , all hang @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shall all hang separately.
’ been more appropriate .
I liked this quote from an Irish Times profile of Martin : One Fianna Fáil TD told the present writer several years ago that he didn ’ t like Martin ; didn ’ t trust him .
He didn ’ t like the way his breakfast was constructed .
“ I see him there [ in the Dáil self-service restaurant ] every morning having his breakfast .
Muesli .
Fruit , ” the TD , a former cabinet minister , spat with contempt .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
.
.
soft runny eggs , I love ‘ em , ” the TD said .
His suspicions about Martin – a bit of an altar boy – were shared by many of his colleagues .
Years ago I was at the Merriman Summer School in Lisdoonvarna .
Martin was giving the keynote speech , and while I was not expecting much he actually spoke really well and seemed to be across his brief .
He is the very definition of a safe pair of hands .
I imagine Leo Varadkar will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a high note and let someone else endure the Covid-19 cleanup and the looming Brexit .
“ Dáil Éireann – Election of An Taoiseach – 27 June 2020 ” by Houses of the Oireachtas is licensed under CC BY

Micheál Martin is a lesson in having patience. If you hang around long enough and play the long game you eventually get the top job. The Corkman is not exactly the most exciting politician but maybe a steady hand on the tiller is exactly what Ireland needs in these turbulent times.
As I said in the Dáil earlier, being elected Taoiseach of a free Republic is the greatest honour that any Irish person could hope for. I am humbled by the responsibility and I pledge to work night and day with my partners in Government to realise the great potential of our nation — Micheál Martin (@MichealMartinTD) June 27, 2020
With the Greens acting as a buffer in a historic coalition with their old enemy of Fine Gael, it will be interesting to see how it all holds together. Never has the Benjamin Franklin phrase, ‘We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.’ been more appropriate.
I liked this quote from an Irish Times profile of Martin:
One Fianna Fáil TD told the present writer several years ago that he didn’t like Martin; didn’t trust him. He didn’t like the way his breakfast was constructed. “I see him there [in the Dáil self-service restaurant] every morning having his breakfast. Muesli. Fruit,” the TD, a former cabinet minister, spat with contempt. “I love a nice big fry . . . soft runny eggs, I love ‘em,” the TD said. His suspicions about Martin – a bit of an altar boy – were shared by many of his colleagues.
Years ago I was at the Merriman Summer School in Lisdoonvarna. Martin was giving the keynote speech, and while I was not expecting much he actually spoke really well and seemed to be across his brief. He is the very definition of a safe pair of hands.
I imagine Leo Varadkar will be more than delighted to be leaving on a high note and let someone else endure the Covid-19 cleanup and the looming Brexit.
“Dáil Éireann – Election of An Taoiseach – 27 June 2020” by Houses of the Oireachtas is licensed under CC BY


sluggerotoole--2020-06-28--If Unionism is to maintain Northern Ireland’s membership of the UK then it must change and evolve –

If Unionism is to maintain Northern Ireland’s membership of the UK then it must change and evolve – otherwise, it will become a footnote in a forgotten story…

There is an old joke within Orange circles that goes , if you put 10 Orangemen into a room for 3 hours and task them with putting together a strategy on their lodge ’ s ambition for the next 10 years , the outcome would be – 15 completely different and contradicting ideas that all must be implemented .
The results being 3 people leaving the Orange for good ( 2 indicating it ’ s gone soft , 1 citing it ’ s got too extreme ) , 3 leave to set up a new lodge calling the 3 leavers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what remains of the original lodge is left in disarray with talk of folding .
In this scenario , the Orange is interchangeable with the Protestant churches or Unionist parties and the story works the same .
In following up on my original article for Slugger , I wanted to discuss some changes in direction that I would like to see across Unionism , however , as outlined above , Unionism takes on so many different strands , bodies and opinions that anything that I contribute to the debate will be agreed by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Unionist camp .
This may seem like an odd topic to begin with , but for me , it is extremely important .
I have found that as a political entity , Unionism is too often ignorant of its history , not only around the formation of Northern Ireland but what led to this , and what Unionism ’ s impact has been on Northern Ireland throughout its existence .
Honestly assessing and understanding the past is key to enabling Unionism to move forward in a more informed and progressive manner .
Currently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Unionism , nothing can be more damaging than when it becomes apparent that they ’ re unaware of their history , this is entirely self-defeating .
One of the huge problems at the moment is leadership wise Unionism is rudderless .
I have spoken before on my admiration for Arlene Foster ’ s handling of the Covid-19 epidemic , ( this extends to Michelle O ’ Neill and Robin Swan ) ; however , it does not hide the fact that her tenure as leader of Unionism has long since expired .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the RHI controversy along with several election hammerings and much more has permanently damaged Ms. Foster ’ s position .
The key problem here is that a successor is not obvious , either from the Westminster or Assembly pool .
Ironically the natural leader resides within the UUP in Doug Beattie , however , Doug has wisely chosen to stay away from leadership at this time .
When David Trimble and then Ian Paisley led Unionism , there was always a pool of people being lined up to succeed either one , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ healthy .
Unionism of all shades needs to begin developing leaders within their ranks , the fact that there is nobody there at present is going to be an ongoing problem – this is one aspect that needs immediate action .
What does Unionism stand for ?
Unionism should be about vibrantly and positively promoting Northern Ireland and its membership of the UK .
Unionism is a very diverse and complex demographic which reflects the Northern Ireland of 2020 .
However , at present with the DUP leading , the vast majority of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but not feeling entirely represented by them .
A key example of this was after the 2017 General Election when the DUP held the balance of power , journalists from Great Britain began interviewing some Unionists around Belfast to find out why they voted DUP ?
A common theme coming back was that they opposed most of their stances on social issues such as same-sex marriage but supported them as being the only viable Unionist party that could stop Sinn Fein .
The party that leads Unionism can not be driven by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which in itself is a minority member of the Protestant churches within Northern Ireland .
Unionism has to move from being a regressive and reactionary movement to one that is genuinely inclusive .
With some justification , many minority communities within Northern Ireland will feel alienated by political Unionism to say nothing of the Nationalist and Other camp and the Unionism demographic itself .
Unionism should be the opposite and fully inclusive , these are unfortunately very empty words as Unionism has frequently failed to be inclusive .
I am always surprised @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a long-term strategy of where it wants to be in 5 , 10 , 15 , or indeed 20 years .
Peter Robinson once mused that Unionism would need to court the Catholic vote as demographics continued to evolve but this was never developed .
We need to be looking towards the future , understanding our vision , and developing a strategy that works towards this .
This should be fully created in the format of a positive vibrant Northern Ireland at ease with itself and inclusive of all of its citizens .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ central theme should be healthcare and the NHS and on how the current system can be improved upon and properly funded .
What motivates a Unionist is not going to be very different from anyone else in society , key concerns are health , jobs , education , child care , the environment , equality and pensions along with living in a safe and peaceful community .
A Northern Ireland that works will have these themes at its heart , it ’ s encouraging to see a Unionist health minister take a huge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individuals have had this theme as a central plank of their agenda ( Robbie Butler stands out here ) , however , a more overarching and joined-up approach that the vast majority of the population can buy into is hugely important .
Sinn Fein in the Republic of Ireland made housing a central plank at the last election and it tapped into a universal demand .
Unionism can do the same by concentrating on bread and butter issues that affect everyone .
The words “ Fill your boots ” should haunt every Unionist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ greedy one-dimensional Unionism that views Westminster as a cash cow .
We have to get Northern Ireland working , which means creating jobs and an economy fit for 2020 and beyond .
Difficult decisions will need to be made to cut waste and the duplication of services and we need to develop our second city .
It was interesting that a Republican friend of mine who owns his own business mentioned that the UK furlough scheme was the only thing that kept him afloat during the pandemic .
This has shown that being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the UK can benefit us all in Northern Ireland , however , we have to make the economy work to show that Northern Ireland can be viewed as more than a financial basket case .
However , we ’ re still ideally situated with a full island to trade with and the overarching protection of the UK – the economy is crucial to everyone in Northern Ireland and Unionism needs to take it seriously .
It should also be noted that money needs to travel further away from Belfast , somewhere like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be happening .
Demographics are not concerning Republicans have made much of the changing demographics in Northern Ireland , however , this should not concern Unionism as it leaves a huge opportunity .
The undecided/other camp has never been larger and these are individuals open to persuasion on the Union .
They are going to be won over on Universal themes and not flags and aggression .
Northern Ireland is a mix of many communities coming together to form a uniquely Northern Irish identity , if people feel they have a stake here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , then there is vastly reduced needs to change the constitution .
Conversely , if Unionism acts as an incompetent , corrupt agitator , guess what people might want to do ?
Any attempts to reach out to Nationalists etc would be seen as cynical and fallacious but it does need to be done .
However , political Unionism needs to reach out to its own demographic first to find out their needs and concerns .
It is incredulous that political Unionism has drifted so far away from its base that it now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who elected it .
Unionism needs to have a serious in-house discussion about what it wants from its elected representatives .
Political Unionism also needs to be more transparent on its actions , for example , this week at Westminster the DUP voted against weekly Covid-19 testing for healthcare workers but they never explained why and this is certainly not something that has any approval across Northern Ireland .
By addressing concerns within the core Unionist base , political Unionism will start to realise that these are aspects that affect everyone in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the fundamentals like health , education , jobs , the economy , law and order , and the environment everyone benefits .
This of course is not to say that these things are not being worked upon at present by political Unionism but there is no overarching strategy to deal with them and frankly grassroots Unionism is not making their voices heard on these matters .
Heard it all Before Nothing Unionism says will change the opinions of many , internal change has to happen and Unionism will have to show it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lectern .
Simply put the Northern Ireland protocol is damaging for Northern Ireland and seriously undermines its position within the UK .
The DUP needs to take a step back on this and bring in some outside help to address this issue .
It is ridiculous to the point of contempt for Sammy Wilson to be making ludicrous statements in Westminster before going on the offensive against Alliance councillors on social media .
The lack of contrition from the DUP on the Brexit fiasco is not endearing them to anyone .
Unionism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strategy that will ease the protocol ’ s impact , ensuring that Northern Ireland is not disadvantageously impacted .
There are obvious first steps it can take in terms of arranging meetings with Dublin , London , and including the other main Northern Ireland parties .
Taking the lead on this , owning the problem and coming up with a solution is something that can benefit all of Northern Ireland .
Lack of Talent and Too Much Incompetence There is the talent within Unionism but not enough , it ’ s outstripped by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Alliance who all boast natural and competent leaders and a membership that in many ways ’ mirrors Northern Ireland .
It ’ s also noticeable that Executive Ministers from these parties are highly regarded ( mostly ) and there is considerable new talent coming through their ranks .
Fewer people want to get involved in Unionism now , gone are the days when Unionism had within its ranks David Trimble , Peter Robinson , Nigel Dodd ’ s ( albeit damaged by Brexit ) , Steven King and even in recent times the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stepped down as MEP , the DUP headhunted Jim Allister for the role who left his position as a barrister , effectively taking a pay cut .
Arguably Jim Allister is one of Unionism ’ s most talented politicians at the moment , however , his brand of politics will not drive Unionism forward .
Political Unionism needs to headhunt new talent for its ranks but people will not want to get involved if Unionism continues to espouse the ugly image it currently has .
Also , when Unionists go rogue or appear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Sammy Wilson blaming Alliance for checkpoints at Larne was incredulous and damaging .
Also , much was made of the Lisburn and Castlereagh council “ Black Lives Matter ” vote and some of the disjointed and at times ill-informed statements from SOME Unionist representatives against the motion that certainly caused some offence on social media .
Whilst the concerns of Unionists about the actual BLM movement and its political leanings are understandable and it ’ s a concern many conservatives share including black conservatives , the problem is they were not clear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This of course left Unionism caught in a trap of its own making .
Unionism needs to be better and sometimes just taking a step back and presenting a more pragmatic view is the best option .
It was mentioned to me recently that the SDLP ’ s Westminster team of 2 was much stronger than the DUP team of 8 .
There is some merit within this statement and it perhaps arises from the fact that the current DUP team is severely damaged and compromised not least due to their partnership with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time to change this team so that it better reflects a 21st century Northern Ireland .
From a very crude analysis due to the current Westminster performances , North Down and North Belfast are beyond the DUP in any future election and East Belfast , East Antrim , Lagan Valley , and South Antrim are all in huge danger of falling at the next election .
Some of the DUP team look out of their depth at times , Gavin Robinson performed very poorly and seemed ill-informed during a debate with Naomi Long @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a safe pair of hands now .
This is all undermines Unionism and leaves the Unionist electorate embarrassed and frankly looking for alternatives .
However , it ’ s not just the Westminster team that needs a shakeup , across the Assembly and indeed some councils there are people in place who are frankly not representing the electorate .
There is a huge lack of females involved in Unionism and parties need more from the < 50 age demographic to get involved .
It ’ s the DUP or Nobody This has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in their current form many people will not vote for the DUP and don ’ t see the UUP as a credible alternative , therefore they either vote Alliance or don ’ t vote .
There is a need for something different within Unionism that better represents younger Unionists and more specifically Liberal Unionists .
When NI21 burst onto the scenes this caused huge concerns within the established Unionist parties as it represented a genuine alternative and had members within it that were relatable and reflected what Northern Ireland is .
Their implosion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opportunity for the UUP to adjust its model to capture this huge demographic and represent a real alternative to the conservative and indeed fundamental DUP .
This was never acted upon and this huge demographic has gone elsewhere with many making a home in the Alliance party .
Unionism can not afford to ignore the liberal demographic , they must be given political representation .
We have to address sectarianism , racism and the threat of violence that can too often exist within Unionism and in no ways represents anything close to mainstream @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this week a UUP party member shared a post indicating that he was learning some words of Irish and sure enough a “ super Unionist ” came along with an ill-informed rant laced with the menace of violence .
Such a thing happens all too often within Unionism and is particularly prevalent on social media .
Sectarianism is all too common also , with words such as “ taig ” and “ Fenian ” thrown in for good measure , this is not called out enough .
We all must lead by example @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nonsense , it turns people off Unionism , it genuinely upsets people and it completely undermines the Unionist cause .
The Alliance Party was never in the IRA When Unionism attacks the Alliance party with such bizarre and unsubstantiated statements , it hardens up some elements within Unionism against Alliance whilst turning others off Unionism .
In East Belfast , such a statement cost Unionist seats on the council and by playing this card it only enhances Alliance .
The attacks the Alliance party received , particularly during the flag protests are something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ am not a supporter of all of Alliances policies but to say they ’ re in league with Sinn Fein or the IRA is absurd .
Also , if we ’ re looking to preserve the Union , Alliance supporters will hold the key , self-preservation may need a more pragmatic approach .
Unionism due at times to bad leadership and also due to being whipped into a frenzy at election time with misinformation can sometimes present a case that is ill-informed and frankly illogical .
Unionism needs to better investigate the facts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was a key example that was utterly damaging to Unionism as it presented Unionism as being insular , paranoid , and intolerant .
Many other examples can be made and this ultimately boils down to Unionists frequently being unable to put forward a solid case for the Union .
For example , the bridge to Scotland sounds like a good idea , in theory , however , it ’ s something Boris Johnson has uttered without thinking it through and repeated to play to the DUP gallery .
Despite structural engineers and experts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and saying that such a bridge is impossible , political Unionism dismissed this and continued to pursue it all because Boris Johnson gave an utterance of approval .
At no stage did anyone within political Unionism seek the advice of a professional to find out if such a bridge was viable , they just arrogantly pursued this eutopia .
If a bridge can be built , I will more than happily concede I was wrong , however , at the moment I can only rely on what the experts say .
I have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but educational underachievement flows through Unionism , Protestantism , Orangeism , and Loyalism and is something that does need to be addressed .
It ’ s baffling that political Unionism has not grasped this issue and it should be a big-ticket item going forward .
With Peter Weir as the Education Minister , there should be no reason why this difficult issue can not be tackled .
Of course , underachievement from all demographics should be tackled , however , as it ’ s is particularly bad within Unionism it illustrates a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
When David Ervine passed away , Loyalists lost their main spokesperson and influencer and Unionism lost a very considerable talent .
David Ervine represented that rarity within Unionism in that he was well informed , pragmatic , and progressive whilst being respected inside and outside of Unionist circles .
With the PUP ( David Ervine ’ s former party ) now reduced to a handful of Councillors , Loyalists have turned to the DUP for direction and the DUP has turned to Loyalists for votes .
The problem here is that this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Loyalists don ’ t fully respect the DUP and on many issues will find them aloof whilst the DUP publicly at least will not want to be seen to be getting too close to Loyalists representing paramilitaries .
This has created huge issues , Loyalism feels that to some extent it is disenfranchised from the political process , and with this , there has been ongoing paramilitary and criminality from certain elements .
If the DUP are representing Loyalism then it needs to bring stakeholders from Loyalism into its ranks and have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ boroughs .
Political Unionism has to work with Loyalism to ensure that they are being properly represented but also to ensure Loyalism is committed to exclusively peaceful means and that there is accountability if this is not happening .
Paramilitaries are long past the time when they should be wound up and political Unionism must be responsible for this .
It benefits nobody to have Loyalist at the edge of society feeling angry and left behind .
They have to have a stake in a modern Northern Ireland that is solely peaceful and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This has to be aided with political representation , jobs , education , and regeneration of their areas so that communities have a chance to flourish .
Under David Ervine Loyalism as a political movement would be further along today , there is an onus on Unionism to continue this journey to a solely peaceful conclusion .
Unionism should be more active in developing better relationships with regional partners in England , Scotland , and Wales in areas of mutual interest .
This has been more visible to some extent during the coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be a part of the UK , we need a strong and productive relationship with our partners within the UK .
For example , has anyone asked Nicola about this bridge ?
During the pandemic , I have been outspoken in my desire that there should be an all-island strategy to deal with the coronavirus and I am happy that this has happened to a large extent .
In Fermanagh , we straddle the border of four counties from the Republic so an all-island approach is just common sense and in no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ political identity .
The same can be true of trade , particularly in a post-Brexit world , businesses here need to be able to trade in the Republic and vice versa and we need to be working with the new government in the Republic to ensure that everything possible is being done that encourages all Ireland trade .
This is a win-win situation for both parts of Ireland and there should be enough goodwill on each side to encourage this as much as possible .
Also , with the establishment of the new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and professional Unionism must reach out to develop a strong and genuine relationship with this government , we have many areas of mutual interest and it makes very little sense to have Unionism being hostile towards the Republic .
Being hostile towards the Republic will only undermine Unionism – there is nothing to be lost and everything to be gained from a positive and generous approach .
On that note , Unionism should reflect on the lack of support given to Senator Ian Marshall during his tenure and if Ian Marshall returns via @ @ @ @ @ @ @ link that should be better developed .
Remove Fear , Sinn Fein and the IRA from all Discussions When a Unionist does something wrong , the response is but look at what Sinn Fein and the IRA did .
When Unionists are asked about the benefits of the Union the conversation will make its way back to the IRA .
When Unionism talks about the future it will be about Sinn Fein .
When Unionism stands for election it will be focused on fear and Sinn Fein .
If political Unionism was a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trip to the doctors or even the psychiatrist .
This is an unhealthy and hugely unappealing attribute within Unionism , we are so focused on what we don ’ t want that we end up being bereft of any ideas on what we do want .
Fear along with “ IRA ” and “ Sinn Fein ” should be removed from all discussions concerning Unionism ’ s future .
It Won ’ t Happen in my Lifetime Radically I almost think a referendum on Irish unification is needed to generate a productive discussion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As Unionism is no longer the majority in Northern Ireland , I have no idea why Unionists continually indicate that unification “ won ’ t happen in my lifetime ” .
It is based on a false premise and completely ignores the changing landscape .
At the moment if a referendum was called Unionism would play “ project fear ” , that almost caused Scotland to leave the UK and played a huge role in Brexit .
I dread to think of the outcome here if such a card was played .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unification and work towards averting it and that involves developing a positive case that is not based on fear .
As I indicated in the opening paragraph , agreeing a plan that the bulk of Unionism can sign up to will be hugely difficult and that is not taking into account what non-Unionists will think .
This article will likely attract its fair share of criticism .
However , as a Unionist , I feel the current direction of travel is unsustainable and damaging .
With poor leadership and no strategy , Unionism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in fear , reacting to events that are increasingly out of its control .
If Unionism is to maintain Northern Ireland ’ s membership of the UK then it must change and evolve – otherwise , it will become a footnote in a forgotten story .
“ Good old North wind.. January 1st 1801 ” by fernando butcher is licensed under CC BY

There is an old joke within Orange circles that goes, if you put 10 Orangemen into a room for 3 hours and task them with putting together a strategy on their lodge’s ambition for the next 10 years, the outcome would be – 15 completely different and contradicting ideas that all must be implemented. The results being 3 people leaving the Orange for good (2 indicating it’s gone soft, 1 citing it’s got too extreme), 3 leave to set up a new lodge calling the 3 leavers traitors and the original lodge Lundies and what remains of the original lodge is left in disarray with talk of folding. In this scenario, the Orange is interchangeable with the Protestant churches or Unionist parties and the story works the same.
In following up on my original article for Slugger, I wanted to discuss some changes in direction that I would like to see across Unionism, however, as outlined above, Unionism takes on so many different strands, bodies and opinions that anything that I contribute to the debate will be agreed by some and lambasted by others within the Unionist camp.
History
This may seem like an odd topic to begin with, but for me, it is extremely important. I have found that as a political entity, Unionism is too often ignorant of its history, not only around the formation of Northern Ireland but what led to this, and what Unionism’s impact has been on Northern Ireland throughout its existence. Honestly assessing and understanding the past is key to enabling Unionism to move forward in a more informed and progressive manner. Currently, when people speak on behalf of Unionism, nothing can be more damaging than when it becomes apparent that they’re unaware of their history, this is entirely self-defeating.
Leadership
One of the huge problems at the moment is leadership wise Unionism is rudderless. I have spoken before on my admiration for Arlene Foster’s handling of the Covid-19 epidemic, (this extends to Michelle O’Neill and Robin Swan); however, it does not hide the fact that her tenure as leader of Unionism has long since expired. The failed handling of Brexit, internal scandal, the RHI controversy along with several election hammerings and much more has permanently damaged Ms. Foster’s position. The key problem here is that a successor is not obvious, either from the Westminster or Assembly pool. Ironically the natural leader resides within the UUP in Doug Beattie, however, Doug has wisely chosen to stay away from leadership at this time. When David Trimble and then Ian Paisley led Unionism, there was always a pool of people being lined up to succeed either one, and to an extent this competition was healthy. Unionism of all shades needs to begin developing leaders within their ranks, the fact that there is nobody there at present is going to be an ongoing problem – this is one aspect that needs immediate action.
What does Unionism stand for?
Unionism should be about vibrantly and positively promoting Northern Ireland and its membership of the UK. Unionism is a very diverse and complex demographic which reflects the Northern Ireland of 2020. However, at present with the DUP leading, the vast majority of Unionists are left voting for this party but not feeling entirely represented by them. A key example of this was after the 2017 General Election when the DUP held the balance of power, journalists from Great Britain began interviewing some Unionists around Belfast to find out why they voted DUP? A common theme coming back was that they opposed most of their stances on social issues such as same-sex marriage but supported them as being the only viable Unionist party that could stop Sinn Fein. The party that leads Unionism cannot be driven by the ideologies of the fundamental Free Presbyterian church, which in itself is a minority member of the Protestant churches within Northern Ireland. Unionism has to move from being a regressive and reactionary movement to one that is genuinely inclusive. With some justification, many minority communities within Northern Ireland will feel alienated by political Unionism to say nothing of the Nationalist and Other camp and the Unionism demographic itself. Unionism should be the opposite and fully inclusive, these are unfortunately very empty words as Unionism has frequently failed to be inclusive.
Long Term Vision
I am always surprised that Unionism has never put in place a long-term strategy of where it wants to be in 5, 10, 15, or indeed 20 years. Peter Robinson once mused that Unionism would need to court the Catholic vote as demographics continued to evolve but this was never developed. We need to be looking towards the future, understanding our vision, and developing a strategy that works towards this. This should be fully created in the format of a positive vibrant Northern Ireland at ease with itself and inclusive of all of its citizens. As part of the Union, a central theme should be healthcare and the NHS and on how the current system can be improved upon and properly funded.
Universal Themes
What motivates a Unionist is not going to be very different from anyone else in society, key concerns are health, jobs, education, child care, the environment, equality and pensions along with living in a safe and peaceful community. A Northern Ireland that works will have these themes at its heart, it’s encouraging to see a Unionist health minister take a huge interest in mental healthcare and I know individuals have had this theme as a central plank of their agenda (Robbie Butler stands out here), however, a more overarching and joined-up approach that the vast majority of the population can buy into is hugely important. Sinn Fein in the Republic of Ireland made housing a central plank at the last election and it tapped into a universal demand. Unionism can do the same by concentrating on bread and butter issues that affect everyone.
It’s the Economy Stupid
The words “Fill your boots” should haunt every Unionist in Northern Ireland and it highlights a greedy one-dimensional Unionism that views Westminster as a cash cow. We have to get Northern Ireland working, which means creating jobs and an economy fit for 2020 and beyond. Difficult decisions will need to be made to cut waste and the duplication of services and we need to develop our second city. It was interesting that a Republican friend of mine who owns his own business mentioned that the UK furlough scheme was the only thing that kept him afloat during the pandemic. This has shown that being protected by a large economy as part of the UK can benefit us all in Northern Ireland, however, we have to make the economy work to show that Northern Ireland can be viewed as more than a financial basket case. However, we’re still ideally situated with a full island to trade with and the overarching protection of the UK – the economy is crucial to everyone in Northern Ireland and Unionism needs to take it seriously. It should also be noted that money needs to travel further away from Belfast, somewhere like Fermanagh is grossly overlooked which should not be happening.
Demographics are not concerning
Republicans have made much of the changing demographics in Northern Ireland, however, this should not concern Unionism as it leaves a huge opportunity. The undecided/other camp has never been larger and these are individuals open to persuasion on the Union. They are going to be won over on Universal themes and not flags and aggression. Northern Ireland is a mix of many communities coming together to form a uniquely Northern Irish identity, if people feel they have a stake here, that Northern Ireland works for them, then there is vastly reduced needs to change the constitution. Conversely, if Unionism acts as an incompetent, corrupt agitator, guess what people might want to do?
Reaching Out
Any attempts to reach out to Nationalists etc would be seen as cynical and fallacious but it does need to be done. However, political Unionism needs to reach out to its own demographic first to find out their needs and concerns. It is incredulous that political Unionism has drifted so far away from its base that it now barely resembles or reflects the views of those who elected it. Unionism needs to have a serious in-house discussion about what it wants from its elected representatives. Political Unionism also needs to be more transparent on its actions, for example, this week at Westminster the DUP voted against weekly Covid-19 testing for healthcare workers but they never explained why and this is certainly not something that has any approval across Northern Ireland. By addressing concerns within the core Unionist base, political Unionism will start to realise that these are aspects that affect everyone in Northern Ireland and by acknowledging and addressing the fundamentals like health, education, jobs, the economy, law and order, and the environment everyone benefits. This of course is not to say that these things are not being worked upon at present by political Unionism but there is no overarching strategy to deal with them and frankly grassroots Unionism is not making their voices heard on these matters.
Heard it all Before
Nothing Unionism says will change the opinions of many, internal change has to happen and Unionism will have to show it’s serious by example and not by the lectern.
Brexit
Simply put the Northern Ireland protocol is damaging for Northern Ireland and seriously undermines its position within the UK. The DUP needs to take a step back on this and bring in some outside help to address this issue. It is ridiculous to the point of contempt for Sammy Wilson to be making ludicrous statements in Westminster before going on the offensive against Alliance councillors on social media. The lack of contrition from the DUP on the Brexit fiasco is not endearing them to anyone. Unionism of all shades needs to develop a strategy that will ease the protocol’s impact, ensuring that Northern Ireland is not disadvantageously impacted. There are obvious first steps it can take in terms of arranging meetings with Dublin, London, and including the other main Northern Ireland parties. Taking the lead on this, owning the problem and coming up with a solution is something that can benefit all of Northern Ireland.
Lack of Talent and Too Much Incompetence
There is the talent within Unionism but not enough, it’s outstripped by Sinn Fein, the SDLP, and Alliance who all boast natural and competent leaders and a membership that in many ways’ mirrors Northern Ireland. It’s also noticeable that Executive Ministers from these parties are highly regarded (mostly) and there is considerable new talent coming through their ranks. Fewer people want to get involved in Unionism now, gone are the days when Unionism had within its ranks David Trimble, Peter Robinson, Nigel Dodd’s (albeit damaged by Brexit), Steven King and even in recent times the underrated Ian Marshall. When Ian Paisley stepped down as MEP, the DUP headhunted Jim Allister for the role who left his position as a barrister, effectively taking a pay cut. Arguably Jim Allister is one of Unionism’s most talented politicians at the moment, however, his brand of politics will not drive Unionism forward. Political Unionism needs to headhunt new talent for its ranks but people will not want to get involved if Unionism continues to espouse the ugly image it currently has.
Also, when Unionists go rogue or appear incompetent, this has to be addressed. Sammy Wilson blaming Alliance for checkpoints at Larne was incredulous and damaging. Also, much was made of the Lisburn and Castlereagh council “Black Lives Matter” vote and some of the disjointed and at times ill-informed statements from SOME Unionist representatives against the motion that certainly caused some offence on social media. Whilst the concerns of Unionists about the actual BLM movement and its political leanings are understandable and it’s a concern many conservatives share including black conservatives, the problem is they were not clear that they fully supported black lives. This of course left Unionism caught in a trap of its own making. Unionism needs to be better and sometimes just taking a step back and presenting a more pragmatic view is the best option.
Change of Personnel
It was mentioned to me recently that the SDLP’s Westminster team of 2 was much stronger than the DUP team of 8. There is some merit within this statement and it perhaps arises from the fact that the current DUP team is severely damaged and compromised not least due to their partnership with the Tories. Now would be the time to change this team so that it better reflects a 21st century Northern Ireland. From a very crude analysis due to the current Westminster performances, North Down and North Belfast are beyond the DUP in any future election and East Belfast, East Antrim, Lagan Valley, and South Antrim are all in huge danger of falling at the next election. Some of the DUP team look out of their depth at times, Gavin Robinson performed very poorly and seemed ill-informed during a debate with Naomi Long whilst Jeffrey Donaldson is by no means a safe pair of hands now. This is all undermines Unionism and leaves the Unionist electorate embarrassed and frankly looking for alternatives. However, it’s not just the Westminster team that needs a shakeup, across the Assembly and indeed some councils there are people in place who are frankly not representing the electorate. There is a huge lack of females involved in Unionism and parties need more from the <50 age demographic to get involved.
It’s the DUP or Nobody
This has been said a lot in Unionist circles and in their current form many people will not vote for the DUP and don’t see the UUP as a credible alternative, therefore they either vote Alliance or don’t vote. There is a need for something different within Unionism that better represents younger Unionists and more specifically Liberal Unionists. When NI21 burst onto the scenes this caused huge concerns within the established Unionist parties as it represented a genuine alternative and had members within it that were relatable and reflected what Northern Ireland is. Their implosion was predictable but this left a huge opportunity for the UUP to adjust its model to capture this huge demographic and represent a real alternative to the conservative and indeed fundamental DUP. This was never acted upon and this huge demographic has gone elsewhere with many making a home in the Alliance party. Unionism cannot afford to ignore the liberal demographic, they must be given political representation.
Become intolerant of intolerance
We have to address sectarianism, racism and the threat of violence that can too often exist within Unionism and in no ways represents anything close to mainstream views within Unionism. For example, this week a UUP party member shared a post indicating that he was learning some words of Irish and sure enough a “super Unionist” came along with an ill-informed rant laced with the menace of violence. Such a thing happens all too often within Unionism and is particularly prevalent on social media. Sectarianism is all too common also, with words such as “taig” and “Fenian” thrown in for good measure, this is not called out enough. We all must lead by example and to be less accepting of this nonsense, it turns people off Unionism, it genuinely upsets people and it completely undermines the Unionist cause.
The Alliance Party was never in the IRA
When Unionism attacks the Alliance party with such bizarre and unsubstantiated statements, it hardens up some elements within Unionism against Alliance whilst turning others off Unionism. In East Belfast, such a statement cost Unionist seats on the council and by playing this card it only enhances Alliance. The attacks the Alliance party received, particularly during the flag protests are something Unionism should take ownership of. I am not a supporter of all of Alliances policies but to say they’re in league with Sinn Fein or the IRA is absurd. Also, if we’re looking to preserve the Union, Alliance supporters will hold the key, self-preservation may need a more pragmatic approach.
Knowledge is Key
Unionism due at times to bad leadership and also due to being whipped into a frenzy at election time with misinformation can sometimes present a case that is ill-informed and frankly illogical. Unionism needs to better investigate the facts. The paranoia over the Irish language was a key example that was utterly damaging to Unionism as it presented Unionism as being insular, paranoid, and intolerant. Many other examples can be made and this ultimately boils down to Unionists frequently being unable to put forward a solid case for the Union. For example, the bridge to Scotland sounds like a good idea, in theory, however, it’s something Boris Johnson has uttered without thinking it through and repeated to play to the DUP gallery. Despite structural engineers and experts in the field of bridges coming out and saying that such a bridge is impossible, political Unionism dismissed this and continued to pursue it all because Boris Johnson gave an utterance of approval. At no stage did anyone within political Unionism seek the advice of a professional to find out if such a bridge was viable, they just arrogantly pursued this eutopia. If a bridge can be built, I will more than happily concede I was wrong, however, at the moment I can only rely on what the experts say.
Education
I have made this point a few times before, but educational underachievement flows through Unionism, Protestantism, Orangeism, and Loyalism and is something that does need to be addressed. It’s baffling that political Unionism has not grasped this issue and it should be a big-ticket item going forward. With Peter Weir as the Education Minister, there should be no reason why this difficult issue cannot be tackled. Of course, underachievement from all demographics should be tackled, however, as it’s is particularly bad within Unionism it illustrates a problem here that needs to be remedied.
Loyalists and Loyalist Paramilitaries
When David Ervine passed away, Loyalists lost their main spokesperson and influencer and Unionism lost a very considerable talent. David Ervine represented that rarity within Unionism in that he was well informed, pragmatic, and progressive whilst being respected inside and outside of Unionist circles. With the PUP (David Ervine’s former party) now reduced to a handful of Councillors, Loyalists have turned to the DUP for direction and the DUP has turned to Loyalists for votes. The problem here is that this is a very awkward and uncomfortable relationship. Loyalists don’t fully respect the DUP and on many issues will find them aloof whilst the DUP publicly at least will not want to be seen to be getting too close to Loyalists representing paramilitaries. This has created huge issues, Loyalism feels that to some extent it is disenfranchised from the political process, and with this, there has been ongoing paramilitary and criminality from certain elements. If the DUP are representing Loyalism then it needs to bring stakeholders from Loyalism into its ranks and have them stand in winnable seats within their boroughs. Political Unionism has to work with Loyalism to ensure that they are being properly represented but also to ensure Loyalism is committed to exclusively peaceful means and that there is accountability if this is not happening. Paramilitaries are long past the time when they should be wound up and political Unionism must be responsible for this. It benefits nobody to have Loyalist at the edge of society feeling angry and left behind. They have to have a stake in a modern Northern Ireland that is solely peaceful and supportive of the rule of law. This has to be aided with political representation, jobs, education, and regeneration of their areas so that communities have a chance to flourish. Under David Ervine Loyalism as a political movement would be further along today, there is an onus on Unionism to continue this journey to a solely peaceful conclusion.
East-West and North-South Relations
Unionism should be more active in developing better relationships with regional partners in England, Scotland, and Wales in areas of mutual interest. This has been more visible to some extent during the coronavirus pandemic, however, if we are to be a part of the UK, we need a strong and productive relationship with our partners within the UK. For example, has anyone asked Nicola about this bridge?
During the pandemic, I have been outspoken in my desire that there should be an all-island strategy to deal with the coronavirus and I am happy that this has happened to a large extent. In Fermanagh, we straddle the border of four counties from the Republic so an all-island approach is just common sense and in no way enhances or undermines anybody’s political identity. The same can be true of trade, particularly in a post-Brexit world, businesses here need to be able to trade in the Republic and vice versa and we need to be working with the new government in the Republic to ensure that everything possible is being done that encourages all Ireland trade. This is a win-win situation for both parts of Ireland and there should be enough goodwill on each side to encourage this as much as possible.
Also, with the establishment of the new government in the Republic, a new and professional Unionism must reach out to develop a strong and genuine relationship with this government, we have many areas of mutual interest and it makes very little sense to have Unionism being hostile towards the Republic. Being hostile towards the Republic will only undermine Unionism – there is nothing to be lost and everything to be gained from a positive and generous approach. On that note, Unionism should reflect on the lack of support given to Senator Ian Marshall during his tenure and if Ian Marshall returns via the new administration, this is a link that should be better developed.
Remove Fear, Sinn Fein and the IRA from all Discussions
When a Unionist does something wrong, the response is but look at what Sinn Fein and the IRA did. When Unionists are asked about the benefits of the Union the conversation will make its way back to the IRA. When Unionism talks about the future it will be about Sinn Fein. When Unionism stands for election it will be focused on fear and Sinn Fein. If political Unionism was a human then the prognosis would be a trip to the doctors or even the psychiatrist. This is an unhealthy and hugely unappealing attribute within Unionism, we are so focused on what we don’t want that we end up being bereft of any ideas on what we do want. Fear along with “IRA” and “Sinn Fein” should be removed from all discussions concerning Unionism’s future.
It Won’t Happen in my Lifetime
Radically I almost think a referendum on Irish unification is needed to generate a productive discussion on the future of Northern Ireland. As Unionism is no longer the majority in Northern Ireland, I have no idea why Unionists continually indicate that unification “won’t happen in my lifetime”. It is based on a false premise and completely ignores the changing landscape. At the moment if a referendum was called Unionism would play “project fear”, that almost caused Scotland to leave the UK and played a huge role in Brexit. I dread to think of the outcome here if such a card was played. We need to take seriously the possibility of unification and work towards averting it and that involves developing a positive case that is not based on fear.
Conclusion
As I indicated in the opening paragraph, agreeing a plan that the bulk of Unionism can sign up to will be hugely difficult and that is not taking into account what non-Unionists will think. This article will likely attract its fair share of criticism. However, as a Unionist, I feel the current direction of travel is unsustainable and damaging. With poor leadership and no strategy, Unionism has retreated to living as a community in fear, reacting to events that are increasingly out of its control. If Unionism is to maintain Northern Ireland’s membership of the UK then it must change and evolve – otherwise, it will become a footnote in a forgotten story.
“Good old North wind.. January 1st 1801” by fernando butcher is licensed under CC BY


sluggerotoole--2020-06-28--The trials of lockdown Laundry…

The trials of lockdown Laundry…

Seven days into lockdown my washing machine , which had served me well , decided to become a space rocket .
It had never been the quietest of machines but excelled itself when it began dancing up and down under the work surface while emitting an ear-splitting , clanking cacophony .
This lasted for about half an hour , during which I was sure it was going to burst out and upwards at any moment .
The cat and I fled the house until all was silent and we realised the machine had , more than likely , ‘ had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of having to hand-wash my clothes for the next two or three months was horrific .
But , surely , a washing machine was an ‘ essential ’ item ?
So I called my local ‘ white goods ’ supplier .
A kind man , called Jeff , answered and told me all I had to do was peruse their web site , choose a new machine and let him know .
A man in a van would come and install it – distancing of course – and take the old one away @ @ @ @ @ @ @ went online… Life today is full of new experiences .
Old experiences – such as choosing a washing machine – are dead in the water .
This brave new world lets you do it all on a screen .
No longer is a person pointing out the innovative abilities of this or that model to make your whites whiter than white , you now have a photograph and a ‘ blurb ’ .
The first one proudly informed me their appliance came in a ‘ classic , glossy , white finish ’ and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of any modern home.
’ Don ’ t they all ?
And haven ’ t they been like that forever ?
This got me thinking… I would love a pink machine or a blue one – or maybe yellow ?
My quixotic attention was drifting already and I was only at number one on a long list .
Reading on , I discovered another machine had , ‘ anti-stain , anti-allergy and stain-bursting washes ’ .
With 16 programmes I could , ‘ feel confident that no matter what the stain – wine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had the setting to deal with it.
’ Gosh !
I could commit the perfect murder… My imagination again , flying away from the task in hand .
Next – get this – an ‘ Eco-Bubble ’ washing machine offering just about everything needed – AND MORE !
!
I wondered what else could one desire a washing machine to actually do , other than washing your clothes .
Would it hang them on the line ?
Fold them , put them away ?
I was hence not immediately excited to learn this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to create a soapy foam that is pumped in with the washing .
I think my grandmother did this with a bar of soap and my grandfather ’ s socks , but never mind .
This penetrates the fabric deeper and more evenly than the standard washing machine and can be added to any programme with the touch of a button .
I then had visions of the perfect , frilly-apron-wearing housewife standing with her finger on her chin , desperately trying to decide should she press that button .
‘ Did her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ little bubbles that day or not ?
’ After pressing the magic button , the temperature would be lowered , “ without compromising on performance.
” Wow !
Washing machines have certainly grown up !
Another ‘ sophisticated ’ machine has fourteen programmes , each with a specific function , whether you need to wash your waterproof coat – ‘ After a week in the wild !
’ or your best outfit ‘ For a big weekend !
’ Number six on the list specialised in baby care , bedding , dark garments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ designed , has smaller holes and a diamond imprint which cushions your laundry and gives it the care it deserves .
It provides a quiet , reliable and long-lasting performance , which comes as ‘ standard ’ .
Thanks to the ‘ Digital Inverter Motor ’ , if there is an error , the Smart Check allows you to download the App , and you can scan the message displayed on the LED screen .
You ’ ll be able to diagnose the error yourself !
( They do not mention who will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with , ‘ Outstanding results across the board.
’ Might this , by any chance , be the ironing board ?
The most expensive machine has a ‘ gentle , honeycomb drum where the clothes glide over a hexagonal sculptured structure with measured detergent use .
It runs quietly with ‘ bespoke ’ wash programmes , including , ‘ proofing ’ and ‘ Tooltip ’ information that tells you about energy and water consumption .
‘ Please !
’ I longed to cry , ‘ I don ’ t want to think about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ busy day – I just want to bung in the clothes , switch on and forget about them.
’ The next machine understood ‘ time is of the essence ’ , with a plethora of programmes including remote control .
It has an A+++ class for washing and spin performance and has ‘ One Touch ’ connectivity .
Simply downloading the App enables you to access a host of extra features !
Through smartphone or tablet you can pair the device with the washing machine through either Near Field Communication , Wi-Fi or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I decided a washboard down at the river was more ‘ my thing ’ .
It continued… ‘ You can receive a report of your laundry activities , perform maintenance checks and even download a new cycle which is then accessed by the One Touch setting.
’ An image of an executive person came into my mind who , in the middle of a management meeting , suddenly wondered , ‘ What about my laundry ?
Maybe I should get a progress report ?
Did I press that button before I left ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ what to do ?
’ With all this information to hand , I could now decide which machine to buy – couldn ’ t I ?
?
?
No , I wanted to lie down somewhere and drum my heels on the ground .
So I phoned Jeff , who , after I told him how much washing I usually did in a normal week , suggested a certain model which I promptly ordered .
The gentleman who came to fit it told me ( without being asked ) the number of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ button to that .
It has been there ever since and will stay that way until my new machine , in its turn , tries to take off for the moon .
“ Good drying weather !
” by judy dean is licensed under CC BY

Seven days into lockdown my washing machine, which had served me well, decided to become a space rocket. It had never been the quietest of machines but excelled itself when it began dancing up and down under the work surface while emitting an ear-splitting, clanking cacophony. This lasted for about half an hour, during which I was sure it was going to burst out and upwards at any moment. The cat and I fled the house until all was silent and we realised the machine had, more than likely, ‘had its wee day’.
The prospect of having to hand-wash my clothes for the next two or three months was horrific. But, surely, a washing machine was an ‘essential’ item? So I called my local ‘white goods’ supplier. A kind man, called Jeff, answered and told me all I had to do was peruse their web site, choose a new machine and let him know. A man in a van would come and install it – distancing of course – and take the old one away. What a relief! Then I went online…
Life today is full of new experiences. Old experiences – such as choosing a washing machine – are dead in the water. This brave new world lets you do it all on a screen. No longer is a person pointing out the innovative abilities of this or that model to make your whites whiter than white, you now have a photograph and a ‘blurb’.
The first one proudly informed me their appliance came in a ‘classic, glossy, white finish’ and ‘would suit the ‘look’ of any modern home.’ Don’t they all? And haven’t they been like that forever?
This got me thinking… I would love a pink machine or a blue one – or maybe yellow? My quixotic attention was drifting already and I was only at number one on a long list.
Reading on, I discovered another machine had, ‘anti-stain, anti-allergy and stain-bursting washes’. With 16 programmes I could, ‘feel confident that no matter what the stain – wine, blood or grease, the machine had the setting to deal with it.’ Gosh! I could commit the perfect murder… My imagination again, flying away from the task in hand.
Next – get this – an ‘Eco-Bubble’ washing machine offering just about everything needed – AND MORE!! I wondered what else could one desire a washing machine to actually do, other than washing your clothes. Would it hang them on the line? Fold them, put them away? I was hence not immediately excited to learn this ‘innovative eco-bubble technology’ is used to create a soapy foam that is pumped in with the washing. I think my grandmother did this with a bar of soap and my grandfather’s socks, but never mind. This penetrates the fabric deeper and more evenly than the standard washing machine and can be added to any programme with the touch of a button. I then had visions of the perfect, frilly-apron-wearing housewife standing with her finger on her chin, desperately trying to decide should she press that button. ‘Did her husband’s shirts need those amazing little bubbles that day or not?’
After pressing the magic button, the temperature would be lowered, “without compromising on performance.” Wow! Washing machines have certainly grown up!
Another ‘sophisticated’ machine has fourteen programmes, each with a specific function, whether you need to wash your waterproof coat – ‘After a week in the wild!’ or your best outfit ‘For a big weekend!’
Number six on the list specialised in baby care, bedding, dark garments and wool. Its drum, uniquely designed, has smaller holes and a diamond imprint which cushions your laundry and gives it the care it deserves. It provides a quiet, reliable and long-lasting performance, which comes as ‘standard’. Thanks to the ‘Digital Inverter Motor’, if there is an error, the Smart Check allows you to download the App, and you can scan the message displayed on the LED screen. You’ll be able to diagnose the error yourself! (They do not mention who will fix it.) The blurb finished with, ‘Outstanding results across the board.’ Might this, by any chance, be the ironing board?
The most expensive machine has a ‘gentle, honeycomb drum where the clothes glide over a hexagonal sculptured structure with measured detergent use. It runs quietly with ‘bespoke’ wash programmes, including, ‘proofing’ and ‘Tooltip’ information that tells you about energy and water consumption.
‘Please!’ I longed to cry, ‘I don’t want to think about these things in the middle of a busy day – I just want to bung in the clothes, switch on and forget about them.’
The next machine understood ‘time is of the essence’, with a plethora of programmes including remote control. It has an A+++ class for washing and spin performance and has ‘One Touch’ connectivity. Simply downloading the App enables you to access a host of extra features! Through smartphone or tablet you can pair the device with the washing machine through either Near Field Communication, Wi-Fi or mobile data.
After reading this, I decided a washboard down at the river was more ‘my thing’.
It continued… ‘You can receive a report of your laundry activities, perform maintenance checks and even download a new cycle which is then accessed by the One Touch setting.’
An image of an executive person came into my mind who, in the middle of a management meeting, suddenly wondered, ‘What about my laundry? Maybe I should get a progress report? Did I press that button before I left? Does it need me to tell it what to do?’
With all this information to hand, I could now decide which machine to buy – couldn’t I??? No, I wanted to lie down somewhere and drum my heels on the ground. So I phoned Jeff, who, after I told him how much washing I usually did in a normal week, suggested a certain model which I promptly ordered. The gentleman who came to fit it told me (without being asked) the number of the programme most people used and turned the button to that. It has been there ever since and will stay that way until my new machine, in its turn, tries to take off for the moon.
“Good drying weather!” by judy dean is licensed under CC BY


Reconciliation above all

Reconciliation is the primary necessity facing Northern Ireland , believes Peter Osborne .
Peter is a former chair of both the Community Relations Council and the Parades Commission .
He was talking in the latest Forward Together podcast from the Holywell Trust .
“ I come from a perspective of looking at what reconciliation is about , ” says Peter .
He argues that to achieve reconciliation it is essential to correct the structures that create separation .
This has led him to strongly argue for the integration of the education and housing systems .
“ You need to make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the conflict , ” he says .
“ We need to tackle the causes of the problem , not deal with the symptoms .
The cause of the problem here is segregation .
That leads to sectarianism and all of the other stuff that we see every day .
There is a real need to make the structural change around education and around play.
” Many health specialists argue that the NHS in Northern Ireland has the wrong structures , with too many buildings , many of them old and inefficient .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ too much money is spent on buildings and not enough on services , requiring a significant reorganisation and reshaping of the service to correct .
Peter has argued that in a similar way Northern Ireland ’ s education system needs its own Bengoa-type review and restructure , with the possibility of reducing overheads and improving outcomes .
That view is influenced by the Department for Education saying that there are around 60,000 surplus places in Northern Ireland schools – though this is a reduction of 35,000 places since 2006 .
However , some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that financial savings are achieved from school mergers – with perhaps extra costs being generated by the construction of new school campuses .
Peter is clear , though , that having surplus school places is wrong .
He says : “ It feels as if it ’ s a waste of money .
Well , it is a waste of money….There are a number of arguments that are relevant – there ’ s the economic arguments , the political arguments as well.
” Peter stresses that apart from the direct costs of school @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also the issue that “ tens or perhaps hundreds of millions of pounds ” are spent a year in bringing children and society together in community cohesion projects that would be unnecessary if children were educated together .
Moreover , if school mergers led to the vacation of some existing school buildings that land could be sold to generate capital receipts that could be re-invested .
There is controversy around shared education campuses – opposition on the one side from some that the specific identity of faith schools is lost , while criticism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is a dilution of what can be achieved from fully integrated schools .
Peter believes that shared campuses are clearly preferable to segregated schools .
“ A lot of good stuff is happening within shared education , ” he says .
“ There is some stuff that is not good .
My criterion is that there is a continuum of moving to a place where children and young people are educated together .
If shared education helps us move along that continuum then fine.
” He adds : “ I ’ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we need .
I am in favour of integrated schools for children learning and developing together : that could be achieved by different models .
I think that ’ s a conversation we need to have .
But I think from the ground up , parents and young people , when they ’ re asked , very clearly say we would prefer everybody in the same classroom together .
There is a demand for that to happen .
“ That doesn ’ t mean that the children , young people , don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the experience from the integrated sector is that there is a greater focus on different types of religious education .
Both the Protestant and the Catholic churches like it when they ’ re involved in it , because they see what each other is doing and there is a greater relationship between the churches.
” But are the politicians willing to do more ?
“ I do see a change happening in the political side , ” says Peter .
However , even if there is a willingness to have more integrated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does not extend to the point of merging the Stranmillis and St. Mary ’ s teacher training colleges .
“ To have two teacher training colleges when clearly we should only have one , with a cost of millions of pounds extra , is ridiculous , ” Peter argues .
“ I do get a sense that there ’ s an acknowledgement of that politically .
And , there was a debate in the Assembly recently where politicians did say they wanted to see an independent review of education .
In the context @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that means a single education system.
” But , believes Peter , there is an equally pressing need to develop shared housing provision .
“ We need to be a lot more ambitious about public housing and about shared housing.
” The target now set is the building of 1500 more social housing units over the next 10 years , compared to the 487 in the previous plan – which is less than 1 % of total new housing stock .
“ And we need to defend the policy on shared housing we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t paramilitary flags going up.
” While the political system has resisted radical change to achieve a more integrated society , Peter believes that greater progress might be achieved if citizens ’ assemblies were used , in the way that has happened in the Republic .
“ I think citizens ’ assemblies and civic engagement more generally are something that we really need to put more resources , more thought into , ” he says .
Peter hopes that citizens ’ assemblies might be used to assist reform of the education system , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There is , he says , “ a real opportunity to use them to come up with some answers ” .
This latest podcast in the second Forward Together series is available here on the website of peace and reconciliation charity Holywell Trust .
It is funded by the Community Relations Council ’ s Media Grant Scheme .
Disclaimer : This project has received support from the Northern Ireland Community Relations Council which aims to promote a pluralist society characterised by equity , respect for diversity , and recognition of interdependence .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Community Relations Council .

Reconciliation is the primary necessity facing Northern Ireland, believes Peter Osborne. Peter is a former chair of both the Community Relations Council and the Parades Commission. He was talking in the latest Forward Together podcast from the Holywell Trust.
“I come from a perspective of looking at what reconciliation is about,” says Peter. He argues that to achieve reconciliation it is essential to correct the structures that create separation. This has led him to strongly argue for the integration of the education and housing systems. “You need to make the structural changes that created segregation and the conflict,” he says.
“We need to tackle the causes of the problem, not deal with the symptoms. The cause of the problem here is segregation. That leads to sectarianism and all of the other stuff that we see every day. There is a real need to make the structural change around education and around play.”
Many health specialists argue that the NHS in Northern Ireland has the wrong structures, with too many buildings, many of them old and inefficient. The Bengoa review of health services concluded that too much money is spent on buildings and not enough on services, requiring a significant reorganisation and reshaping of the service to correct. Peter has argued that in a similar way Northern Ireland’s education system needs its own Bengoa-type review and restructure, with the possibility of reducing overheads and improving outcomes.
That view is influenced by the Department for Education saying that there are around 60,000 surplus places in Northern Ireland schools – though this is a reduction of 35,000 places since 2006. However, some educationalists argue that there is no indication that financial savings are achieved from school mergers – with perhaps extra costs being generated by the construction of new school campuses.
Peter is clear, though, that having surplus school places is wrong. He says: “It feels as if it’s a waste of money. Well, it is a waste of money….There are a number of arguments that are relevant – there’s the economic arguments, the political arguments as well.”
Peter stresses that apart from the direct costs of school building and teacher duplication, there is also the issue that “tens or perhaps hundreds of millions of pounds” are spent a year in bringing children and society together in community cohesion projects that would be unnecessary if children were educated together. Moreover, if school mergers led to the vacation of some existing school buildings that land could be sold to generate capital receipts that could be re-invested.
There is controversy around shared education campuses – opposition on the one side from some that the specific identity of faith schools is lost, while criticism on the other from those who believe it is a dilution of what can be achieved from fully integrated schools. Peter believes that shared campuses are clearly preferable to segregated schools.
“A lot of good stuff is happening within shared education,” he says. “There is some stuff that is not good. My criterion is that there is a continuum of moving to a place where children and young people are educated together. If shared education helps us move along that continuum then fine.”
He adds: “I’m not saying one system is all that we need. I am in favour of integrated schools for children learning and developing together: that could be achieved by different models. I think that’s a conversation we need to have. But I think from the ground up, parents and young people, when they’re asked, very clearly say we would prefer everybody in the same classroom together. There is a demand for that to happen.
“That doesn’t mean that the children, young people, don’t get any religious education. Actually, the experience from the integrated sector is that there is a greater focus on different types of religious education. Both the Protestant and the Catholic churches like it when they’re involved in it, because they see what each other is doing and there is a greater relationship between the churches.”
But are the politicians willing to do more? “I do see a change happening in the political side,” says Peter. However, even if there is a willingness to have more integrated schools and shared campuses, that shift does not extend to the point of merging the Stranmillis and St. Mary’s teacher training colleges. “To have two teacher training colleges when clearly we should only have one, with a cost of millions of pounds extra, is ridiculous,” Peter argues. “I do get a sense that there’s an acknowledgement of that politically. And, there was a debate in the Assembly recently where politicians did say they wanted to see an independent review of education. In the context of New Decade, New Approach, that means a single education system.”
But, believes Peter, there is an equally pressing need to develop shared housing provision. “We need to be a lot more ambitious about public housing and about shared housing.” The target now set is the building of 1500 more social housing units over the next 10 years, compared to the 487 in the previous plan – which is less than 1% of total new housing stock. “And we need to defend the policy on shared housing we have, making sure there aren’t paramilitary flags going up.”
While the political system has resisted radical change to achieve a more integrated society, Peter believes that greater progress might be achieved if citizens’ assemblies were used, in the way that has happened in the Republic. “I think citizens’ assemblies and civic engagement more generally are something that we really need to put more resources, more thought into,” he says. Peter hopes that citizens’ assemblies might be used to assist reform of the education system, the environment and other social issues. There is, he says, “a real opportunity to use them to come up with some answers”.
This latest podcast in the second Forward Together series is available here on the website of peace and reconciliation charity Holywell Trust. It is funded by the Community Relations Council’s Media Grant Scheme.
Disclaimer: This project has received support from the Northern Ireland Community Relations Council which aims to promote a pluralist society characterised by equity, respect for diversity, and recognition of interdependence. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Community Relations Council.