usatoday--2020-01-08--Fact check: Trump discusses escalation of tensions with Iran in televised speech

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump used a televised address Wednesday to warn Tehran of further provocations after it launched more than a dozen ballistic missiles on two bases in Iraq where American troops are stationed .
But he also noted there were no American or Iraqi casualties as a result of the attacks , which Iranian officials said were in response to last week 's U.S. drone strike that killed Iran 's top military commander Gen. Qasem Soleimani .
Trump outlined what he said were the causes of the sharp escalation between the two countries and signaled he was open @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the president 's assertions : What he said : Trump said hostilities with Iran substantially increased when the U.S. joined with five other nations to sign an agreement that eased sanctions with Iran in exchange for Tehran curbing its nuclear program .
“ Iran 's hostilities substantially increased after the foolish Iran nuclear deal was signed in 2013 , '' he said .
Context : Trump promised during his 2016 campaign to scrap the nuclear agreement with Iran , saying it was too lenient because the limits on Tehran 's enrichment were temporary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ development of its missile program .
While Trump tied the escalation of tensions to the deal negotiated under President Barack Obama , a series of major provocations occurred after Trump withdrew the U.S. from the agreement in 2018 .
Those included attacks on tankers near the Strait of Hormuz last year and the downing of a U.S. drone , which Iran said had violated its airspace .
Critics of the Iran deal have said Tehran used the money it received as part of the agreement to finance terrorism in the Middle East .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including Secretary of State John Kerry , acknowledged the possibility that Iran might use some of the money realized through sanctions relief to fund terrorist groups .
But Tehran 's funding of militant groups was ongoing years before the deal was reached .
Trump also misstated when the Iranian nuclear agreement was signed .
Although an interim deal was signed in 2013 , the broad multilateral agreement – known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action – was signed two years later in 2015 .
Attack on bases : What we know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Iraq What happens next ?
Iran 's assault was the most aggressive in decades What he said : “ Iran has been the leading sponsor of terrorism.
” Context : In a November 2019 report , the State Department lists four “ state sponsors ” of terrorism – official governments that support acts of international terrorism : North Korea , Iran , Sudan and Syria .
But it singles out Iran as the worst offender .
“ Iran remains the world ’ s worst state sponsor of terrorism , ” concluded the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ review of 2018 data and activities .
“ The regime has spent nearly one billion dollars per year to support terrorist groups that serve as its proxies and expand its malign influence across the globe .
Tehran has funded international terrorist groups such as Hizballah , Hamas , and Palestinian Islamic Jihad .
It also has engaged in its own terrorist plotting around the world , particularly in Europe.
” But experts have raised questions about labeling Iran as the worst state sponsor of terrorism .
And Trump has not always put Iran @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to terrorism .
In his 2011 book , Trump called Saudi Arabia “ the world ’ s biggest funder of terrorism .
Saudi Arabia funnels our petrodollars , our very own money , to fund the terrorists that seek to destroy our people.
” Indeed , terrorism experts note that in the Sept. 11 , 2001 , attack on the United States , 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis and the kingdom has been a source of terrorism financing for years .
“ Saudi Arabia ’ s society was a place where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and through charities , ” the 9/11 Commission Report states .
“ It was the society that produced 15 of the 19 hijackers.
” The Saudi government has taken steps since 9/11 to prevent money laundering and other crimes that enable terrorism financing , but serious gaps remain , according to a 2018 report by the Financial Action Task Force , an inter-governmental body .
What he said : After suggesting relations began fraying with Iran on Obama 's watch with the signing of the nuclear deal , Trump suggested his predecessor gave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were given $ 150 billion , not to mention $ 1.8 billion in cash .
Instead of saying ‘ thank you ’ to the United States , they chanted 'Death to America . '
” Trump went further to claim : `` The missiles fired last night at us and our allies were paid for with the funds made available by the last administration . ''
Context : Trump has cited both figures in the past to make the case that the Obama administration gave Iran a gift of billions of dollars .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ signed a multinational deal to restrain its nuclear development in 2015 , Iran was allowed access to its own assets , which had been frozen .
The U.S. Treasury or other countries did not give Iran $ 150 billion .
Rather , Iran was allowed to gain access to its own money .
As for the $ 1.8 billion , Iran did get a payment of roughly that amount from the U.S. Treasury .
But that was to pay an old IOU , according to the Associated Press .
In the 1970s , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for military equipment that was never delivered because the government was overthrown and diplomatic relations ruptured .
After the nuclear deal , the U.S. and Iran announced they had settled the matter , with the U.S. agreeing to pay the $ 400 million principal along with about $ 1.3 billion in interest .
The $ 400 million was paid in cash and flown to Tehran on a cargo plane .
The arrangement provided for the interest to be paid later .
Susan Rice , a national security adviser under the Obama administration , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Iran had ballistic missile technology before the deal was reached .
“ Iran has had these sophisticated missiles , they 've been developing their capacity for many many years .
To say that that money funded the attack on our personnel and on our base is just the most disgraceful kind of lie , of the sort that unfortunately President Trump tells every day , '' she told MSNBC .
More : What you need to know about rising tensions between the U.S. and Iran after Soleimani death What he said : Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his administration is spending on the military , and he did so again during his remarks about Iran on Wednesday .
“ The American military has been completely rebuilt under my administration , at a cost of $ 2.5 trillion .
U.S. Armed Forces are stronger than ever before.
” Context : Trump has freed up additional money for the military as the White House and Congress have brokered budget agreements in recent years to roll back deep sequestration cuts to Defense and non-Defense spending .
However , the president has often overstated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a military budget expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies , said Trump ’ s claim of spending more than $ 2 trillion on military equipment over the last three years is incorrect .
The Pentagon bought less than half a trillion in equipment over that period , according to Harrison .
Personnel costs , operations and research and development account for much of the remaining balance .
What he said : “ In recent months alone , Iran has seized ships in international waters , fired an unprovoked strike @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two U.S. drones.
” Context : A single U.S. military surveillance drone was downed by Iran 's Islamic Revolution Guard Corps ( IRGC ) in June 2019 as it was flying over the Strait of Hormuz , a vital chokepoint for transporting oil .
The IRGC said the aircraft had violated Iranian airspace , and that the incident sent a `` clear message to America . ''
However , the Pentagon said the drone was over international waters at the time is was shot down .
At the time , in response to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Iran made a very big mistake ! ''
A month later the US had shot down an Iranian drone that was menacing a US Navy ship in the Persian Gulf .
What he said : The Trump administration has justified the U.S. strike last week killing Soleimani by saying the Iranian general was planning additional attacks in Iraq against U.S. troops .
“ In recent days , he was planning new attacks on American targets , ” Trump said in his remarks Wednesday .
“ But we stopped him.
” Context : Was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ killing ?
It ’ s unclear .
Trump administration officials have not offered detailed information in public about the timing or extent of the plots by Soleimani that prompted the order .
Soleimani has been linked to sophisticated roadside bomb attacks that killed hundreds of U.S. troops in the Iraq war and more recently rocket fire that killed an American contractor on Dec. 27 .
Defense Secretary Mark Esper on Tuesday made the most definitive statement when he told reporters that the attacks Soleimani was planning were likely days , not weeks , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exquisite ” intelligence about Soleimani ’ s plans to kill American personnel .
Some Democratic members of Congress , including Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut , have said the Trump administration has failed to offer tangible evidence that Soleimani ’ s attacks were imminent .
Assassination ?
Legal debate rages as Iran retaliates against US for Soleimani killing What he said : Soleimani `` trained terrorist armies , including Hezbollah , launching terrorist strikes against civilian targets.
” And , “ he orchestrated the violent assault on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Quds Force , an elite military branch of Iran 's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps , Soleimani directed pro-Iranian , non-state groups or proxies from Lebanon to Yemen .
At the time of his death , he was managing and mobilizing militias in Iraq , including groups responsible for a recent siege on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad .
Lebanon 's Iran-allied Hezbollah movement is one of the proxies Soleimani had close ties with , including its leader Hassan Nasrallah , who urged Iran after Soleimani 's death to target the U.S. military presence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ designated as a terrorist organization by a large section of the international community .
What he said : “ Iran ’ s hostilities substantially increased after the foolish Iran nuclear deal was signed ... .
Instead of saying ‘ thank you ’ to the United States , they chanted ‘ death to America.
’ In fact , they chanted ‘ death to America ’ the day the agreement was signed.
” Context : As a slogan , `` Death to America '' has been a staple of Iranian political discourse since the Islamic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regularly be heard at large Friday prayer services in Tehran and across the country .
It can frequently be heard at pro-government demonstrations , sessions in parliament , official ceremonies and at meetings with current Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei .
Across Tehran , large paintings and billboards can be seen that display fiery anti-American messages and portraits .
What he said : “ We are now the number one producer of oil and natural gas anywhere in the world .
We are independent , and we do not need Middle East oil.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world ’ s top producer of oil and natural gas , according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration .
The U.S. increased petroleum and natural gas production by 16 % and 18 % , respectively , in 2018 , notching a new production record , the agency announced in August .
Petroleum production includes crude oil and lease condensate , natural gas plant liquids and bitumen .
But the U.S. is not completely free of importing Middle East oil , as Trump claimed , since the U.S. still imports it .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vow to avoid conflict to an order to kill Iran general

Courtney Subramanian, John Fritze, Michael Collins and Tom Vanden Brook, USA TODAY

Fact check: Trump discusses escalation of tensions with Iran in televised speech
Show Caption Hide Caption Are we really ready for a World War III? Fears are mounting around the world following the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani - but is World War 3 about to happen? Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump used a televised address Wednesday to warn Tehran of further provocations after it launched more than a dozen ballistic missiles on two bases in Iraq where American troops are stationed.
But he also noted there were no American or Iraqi casualties as a result of the attacks, which Iranian officials said were in response to last week's U.S. drone strike that killed Iran's top military commander Gen. Qasem Soleimani. Trump outlined what he said were the causes of the sharp escalation between the two countries and signaled he was open to dialogue. USA TODAY has fact-checked the president's assertions:
Hostilities began when?
What he said: Trump said hostilities with Iran substantially increased when the U.S. joined with five other nations to sign an agreement that eased sanctions with Iran in exchange for Tehran curbing its nuclear program.
“Iran's hostilities substantially increased after the foolish Iran nuclear deal was signed in 2013," he said.
Context: Trump promised during his 2016 campaign to scrap the nuclear agreement with Iran, saying it was too lenient because the limits on Tehran's enrichment were temporary and there were insufficient prohibitions on the development of its missile program.
While Trump tied the escalation of tensions to the deal negotiated under President Barack Obama, a series of major provocations occurred after Trump withdrew the U.S. from the agreement in 2018. Those included attacks on tankers near the Strait of Hormuz last year and the downing of a U.S. drone, which Iran said had violated its airspace.
Critics of the Iran deal have said Tehran used the money it received as part of the agreement to finance terrorism in the Middle East. At the time, Obama administration officials, including Secretary of State John Kerry, acknowledged the possibility that Iran might use some of the money realized through sanctions relief to fund terrorist groups. But Tehran's funding of militant groups was ongoing years before the deal was reached.
Trump also misstated when the Iranian nuclear agreement was signed. Although an interim deal was signed in 2013, the broad multilateral agreement – known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action – was signed two years later in 2015.
Attack on bases: What we know about the assessment of damage to bases in Iraq
What happens next? Iran's assault was the most aggressive in decades
Does Iran sponsor terrorism?
What he said: “Iran has been the leading sponsor of terrorism.”
Context: In a November 2019 report, the State Department lists four “state sponsors” of terrorism – official governments that support acts of international terrorism: North Korea, Iran, Sudan and Syria.
But it singles out Iran as the worst offender.
“Iran remains the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism,” concluded the State Department report, which is a review of 2018 data and activities. “The regime has spent nearly one billion dollars per year to support terrorist groups that serve as its proxies and expand its malign influence across the globe. Tehran has funded international terrorist groups such as Hizballah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. It also has engaged in its own terrorist plotting around the world, particularly in Europe.”
But experts have raised questions about labeling Iran as the worst state sponsor of terrorism. And Trump has not always put Iran at No. 1 when it comes to terrorism.
In his 2011 book, Trump called Saudi Arabia “the world’s biggest funder of terrorism. Saudi Arabia funnels our petrodollars, our very own money, to fund the terrorists that seek to destroy our people.”
Indeed, terrorism experts note that in the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the United States, 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis and the kingdom has been a source of terrorism financing for years.
“Saudi Arabia’s society was a place where al Qaeda raised money directly from individuals and through charities,” the 9/11 Commission Report states. “It was the society that produced 15 of the 19 hijackers.”
The Saudi government has taken steps since 9/11 to prevent money laundering and other crimes that enable terrorism financing, but serious gaps remain, according to a 2018 report by the Financial Action Task Force, an inter-governmental body.
Money provisions
What he said: After suggesting relations began fraying with Iran on Obama's watch with the signing of the nuclear deal, Trump suggested his predecessor gave billions to Tehran.
"And they were given $150 billion, not to mention $1.8 billion in cash. Instead of saying ‘thank you’ to the United States, they chanted 'Death to America.'”
Trump went further to claim: "The missiles fired last night at us and our allies were paid for with the funds made available by the last administration."
Context: Trump has cited both figures in the past to make the case that the Obama administration gave Iran a gift of billions of dollars. That picture is misleading.
After it signed a multinational deal to restrain its nuclear development in 2015, Iran was allowed access to its own assets, which had been frozen. The U.S. Treasury or other countries did not give Iran $150 billion. Rather, Iran was allowed to gain access to its own money.
As for the $1.8 billion, Iran did get a payment of roughly that amount from the U.S. Treasury. But that was to pay an old IOU, according to the Associated Press.
In the 1970s, Iran paid the U.S. $400 million for military equipment that was never delivered because the government was overthrown and diplomatic relations ruptured. After the nuclear deal, the U.S. and Iran announced they had settled the matter, with the U.S. agreeing to pay the $400 million principal along with about $1.3 billion in interest.
The $400 million was paid in cash and flown to Tehran on a cargo plane. The arrangement provided for the interest to be paid later.
Susan Rice, a national security adviser under the Obama administration, pointed out after Trump's speech that Iran had ballistic missile technology before the deal was reached.
“Iran has had these sophisticated missiles, they've been developing their capacity for many many years. To say that that money funded the attack on our personnel and on our base is just the most disgraceful kind of lie, of the sort that unfortunately President Trump tells every day," she told MSNBC.
More: What you need to know about rising tensions between the U.S. and Iran after Soleimani death
Military funding
What he said: Trump has often touted the amount of money his administration is spending on the military, and he did so again during his remarks about Iran on Wednesday.
“The American military has been completely rebuilt under my administration, at a cost of $2.5 trillion. U.S. Armed Forces are stronger than ever before.”
Context: Trump has freed up additional money for the military as the White House and Congress have brokered budget agreements in recent years to roll back deep sequestration cuts to Defense and non-Defense spending. However, the president has often overstated the level of investment.
Todd Harrison, a military budget expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said Trump’s claim of spending more than $2 trillion on military equipment over the last three years is incorrect. The Pentagon bought less than half a trillion in equipment over that period, according to Harrison. Personnel costs, operations and research and development account for much of the remaining balance.
Downing of U.S. drone
What he said: “In recent months alone, Iran has seized ships in international waters, fired an unprovoked strike on Saudi Arabia, and shot down two U.S. drones.”
Context: A single U.S. military surveillance drone was downed by Iran's Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) in June 2019 as it was flying over the Strait of Hormuz, a vital chokepoint for transporting oil. The IRGC said the aircraft had violated Iranian airspace, and that the incident sent a "clear message to America." However, the Pentagon said the drone was over international waters at the time is was shot down.
At the time, in response to the incident, Trump tweeted: "Iran made a very big mistake!" A month later the US had shot down an Iranian drone that was menacing a US Navy ship in the Persian Gulf.
Planned attacks
What he said: The Trump administration has justified the U.S. strike last week killing Soleimani by saying the Iranian general was planning additional attacks in Iraq against U.S. troops. “In recent days, he was planning new attacks on American targets,” Trump said in his remarks Wednesday. “But we stopped him.”
Context: Was Soleimani planning an attack that justified his killing? It’s unclear. Trump administration officials have not offered detailed information in public about the timing or extent of the plots by Soleimani that prompted the order. Soleimani has been linked to sophisticated roadside bomb attacks that killed hundreds of U.S. troops in the Iraq war and more recently rocket fire that killed an American contractor on Dec. 27.
Defense Secretary Mark Esper on Tuesday made the most definitive statement when he told reporters that the attacks Soleimani was planning were likely days, not weeks, from being launched. Esper cited “exquisite” intelligence about Soleimani’s plans to kill American personnel. Some Democratic members of Congress, including Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, have said the Trump administration has failed to offer tangible evidence that Soleimani’s attacks were imminent.
Assassination? Legal debate rages as Iran retaliates against US for Soleimani killing
Trump: 'Saved a lot of lives' in Soleimani attack President Donald Trump defended his decision to target and kill top Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, insisting his decision saved American lives. Trump also backed down from his threats to target Iranian cultural sites if Iran retaliates. (Jan. 7) AP
Soleimani's record
What he said: Soleimani "trained terrorist armies, including Hezbollah, launching terrorist strikes against civilian targets.” And, “he orchestrated the violent assault on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad.”
Context: As the head of the Quds Force, an elite military branch of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, Soleimani directed pro-Iranian, non-state groups or proxies from Lebanon to Yemen. At the time of his death, he was managing and mobilizing militias in Iraq, including groups responsible for a recent siege on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.
Lebanon's Iran-allied Hezbollah movement is one of the proxies Soleimani had close ties with, including its leader Hassan Nasrallah, who urged Iran after Soleimani's death to target the U.S. military presence in the Middle East. Hezbollah is designated as a terrorist organization by a large section of the international community.
'Death to America' chant
What he said: “Iran’s hostilities substantially increased after the foolish Iran nuclear deal was signed.... Instead of saying ‘thank you’ to the United States, they chanted ‘death to America.’ In fact, they chanted ‘death to America’ the day the agreement was signed.”
Context: As a slogan, "Death to America" has been a staple of Iranian political discourse since the Islamic Republic's Revolution in 1979 and can regularly be heard at large Friday prayer services in Tehran and across the country. It can frequently be heard at pro-government demonstrations, sessions in parliament, official ceremonies and at meetings with current Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Across Tehran, large paintings and billboards can be seen that display fiery anti-American messages and portraits.
America leads the world in oil production
What he said: “We are now the number one producer of oil and natural gas anywhere in the world. We are independent, and we do not need Middle East oil.”
Context: The United States is the world’s top producer of oil and natural gas, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The U.S. increased petroleum and natural gas production by 16% and 18%, respectively, in 2018, notching a new production record, the agency announced in August. Petroleum production includes crude oil and lease condensate, natural gas plant liquids and bitumen. But the U.S. is not completely free of importing Middle East oil, as Trump claimed, since the U.S. still imports it.
The decision: How Trump went from a vow to avoid conflict to an order to kill Iran general
Contributing: Kim Hjelmgaard, Deirdre Shesgreen and David Brinkerhoff


usatoday--2020-01-08--Twitter users slam Donald Trump for misstating the year of 'foolish' Iran nuclear deal

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump was singed on Twitter Wednesday when he appeared to misstate the date of the landmark nuclear agreement that Iran signed with the U.S. and five other countries .
In his address to the nation , Trump claimed that hostilities with Iran increased substantially “ after the foolish Iran nuclear deal was signed in 2013.
” The final nuclear agreement was signed in 2015 .
The White House said Trump was referring to an interim accord that was signed in 2013 and paved the way for the final agreement .
“ 2013 was when the initial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the final agreement in 2015 , ” White House spokesman Judd Deere said .
Read the transcript : 'Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon . '
Read Donald Trump 's remarks on Iran The interim agreement signed on Nov. 24 , 2013 spelled out an approach for working toward a long-term comprehensive pact dealing with international concerns about Iran ’ s nuclear program .
On April 2 , 2015 , Iran and the other countries reached a framework for a long-term deal , which was finalized the following July @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deal as a candidate for president , announced in 2018 that the U.S. was pulling out of the long-term agreement .
But in previous speeches , he has usually cited the 2015 pact , not the 2013 interim deal .
In a speech to the United Nations in 2018 , when arguing Iran ’ s neighbors paid a heavy toll for its aggression and expansion , Trump added : `` That is why so many countries in the Middle East strongly supported my decision to withdraw the United States from the horrible 2015 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ . ''
When he announced the U.S. was withdrawing from the agreement , Trump said : “ In 2015 , the previous administration joined with other nations in a deal regarding Iran ’ s nuclear program . ''
Twitter took notice when he switched the dates in his speech on Wednesday .
Live : Trump warns Iran but says US 'ready to embrace peace with all who seek it '

Michael Collins and John Fritze, USA TODAY

Twitter users slam Donald Trump for misstating the year of 'foolish' Iran nuclear deal
Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump responds to Iran missile attack, seeks NATO help President Donald Trump addressed the Iranian regime after it rained more than a dozen missiles down on airbases in Iraq housing U.S. troops. USA TODAY
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump was singed on Twitter Wednesday when he appeared to misstate the date of the landmark nuclear agreement that Iran signed with the U.S. and five other countries.
In his address to the nation, Trump claimed that hostilities with Iran increased substantially “after the foolish Iran nuclear deal was signed in 2013.”
The final nuclear agreement was signed in 2015.
The White House said Trump was referring to an interim accord that was signed in 2013 and paved the way for the final agreement.
“2013 was when the initial agreement was signed that ultimately led to the final agreement in 2015,” White House spokesman Judd Deere said.
Read the transcript: 'Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.' Read Donald Trump's remarks on Iran
The interim agreement signed on Nov. 24, 2013 spelled out an approach for working toward a long-term comprehensive pact dealing with international concerns about Iran’s nuclear program.
On April 2, 2015, Iran and the other countries reached a framework for a long-term deal, which was finalized the following July.
Trump, who repeatedly criticized the deal as a candidate for president, announced in 2018 that the U.S. was pulling out of the long-term agreement.
But in previous speeches, he has usually cited the 2015 pact, not the 2013 interim deal.
In a speech to the United Nations in 2018, when arguing Iran’s neighbors paid a heavy toll for its aggression and expansion, Trump added: "That is why so many countries in the Middle East strongly supported my decision to withdraw the United States from the horrible 2015 Iran Nuclear Deal and re-impose nuclear sanctions."
When he announced the U.S. was withdrawing from the agreement, Trump said: “In 2015, the previous administration joined with other nations in a deal regarding Iran’s nuclear program."
Twitter took notice when he switched the dates in his speech on Wednesday.
Trump said Iran's hostilities increased after the "foolish nuclear deal was signed in 2013." The substantive claim aside, it was signed in 2015.
He said the deal "expires shortly anyway." "Shortly" is subjective, but some provisions are indefinite, and others run to 2035, 2040. — Daniel Dale (@ddale8) January 8, 2020
Trump said Iran's hostilities increased after the "foolish nuclear deal was signed in 2013."
Interim agreement was made in 2013 with Joint Plan of Action, however, the deal was signed and adopted in 2015 #IranvsUSA — Uzair Hasan Rizvi (@RizviUzair) January 8, 2020
Live: Trump warns Iran but says US 'ready to embrace peace with all who seek it'
Background: U.S. withdraws from Iran nuclear deal, a set-up for Trump's ultimate goal


usatoday--2020-01-08--Senate Democrats grow impatient waiting for Pelosi to send articles for Trump impeachment trial

WASHINGTON – Senate Democrats are growing impatient for the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump , as the impasse continues over sending the articles of impeachment from the Democratic House to the Republican-led Senate .
`` We 're ready , willing and able , '' said Sen. Richard Blumenthal , D-Conn. , a former state attorney general .
`` I 'm ready to go to court and try this case . ''
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , D-Calif. , has delayed sending the two articles , which accuse Trump of abuse of power and obstruction Congress , until she learns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be conducted .
A big sticking point between the two sides is whether witnesses will be allowed to testify during the Senate trial .
Democrats have argued the trial should include witnesses who did n't testify during the House inquiry .
But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell , R-Ky. , announced Tuesday he has the votes to begin the trial without making a decision on witnesses .
But McConnell said he wo n't hold the vote until the Senate receives the articles .
McConnell said the trial rules would be modeled on those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 1999 .
House managers , who serve as prosecutors , and White House lawyers , who serve as defense lawyers , would give opening statements .
Then senators would submit questions to each side through Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts , who will preside .
After those steps , senators could vote on witnesses .
McConnell : :GOP will move on without Democrats to set rules for Senate impeachment trial of Trump Pelosi declined to comment Wednesday when reporters asked about sending the articles to the Senate .
But she told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that McConnell should publish the rules the Senate will follow in the trial .
She has argued she needs to know the rules in order to decide who and how many managers she should appoint to prosecute the case .
`` It is important that he immediately publish this resolution , so that , as I have said before , we can see the arena in which we will be participating , appoint managers and transmit the articles to the Senate , '' Pelosi said .
But McConnell said Pelosi is waiting in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trial .
`` Supposedly the explanation for this shameless game-playing is that Speaker Pelosi wanted leverage – leverage to reach into the Senate and dictate our trial proceedings to us , '' McConnell said Wednesday .
`` Now I ’ ve made clear from the beginning that no such leverage exists .
It is nonexistent .
And yesterday we made clear it will never exist . ''
Blumenthal said now that Pelosi knows the plan , she should transmit the articles of impeachment to the Senate – even if she does n't have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ She knows what the plan is and she will have to make a judgement , ” Blumenthal said .
Blumenthal : Some GOP 'have very severe misgivings ' about McConnell impeachment strategy He joined a growing list of Senate Democrats , including Sens .
Dianne Feinstein of California , Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Joe Manchin of West Virginia , who have made similar comments that it ’ s time for the Senate to receive the articles .
“ I think if we ’ re going to do it , we should do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee , who added that she didn ’ t understand what could be gained by a delay .
Murphy said the “ best leverage ” to gaining witnesses and documents in the trial was a “ vote on the floor of the Senate . ''
“ Pelosi 's going to make her own decision , but I think that at this point , our best leverage to get witnesses and document production is inside the confines of the trial , '' Murphy said .
McConnell 's announcement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York that senators should vote before the trial starts on whether to hear testimony from witnesses .
One of the potential witnesses , former national security adviser John Bolton , said Monday he would testify if subpoenaed .
The House accused Trump of abusing the power of his office by asking Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rival , former Vice President Joe Biden , withholding a White House meeting and $ 391 million in military aid .
The House also accused Trump of obstructing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defy subpoenas for documents and testimony , although some officials did testify .
The House approved the two articles of impeachment on Dec. 18 .
Trump and congressional Republicans have argued he had the authority to set foreign policy and was justified in fighting corruption in Ukraine .
Trump has said he expects to be exonerated in the Senate trial .

Christal Hayes and Bart Jansen, USA TODAY

Senate Democrats grow impatient waiting for Pelosi to send articles for Trump impeachment trial
Show Caption Hide Caption Are we really ready for a World War III? Fears are mounting around the world following the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani - but is World War 3 about to happen? Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON – Senate Democrats are growing impatient for the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, as the impasse continues over sending the articles of impeachment from the Democratic House to the Republican-led Senate.
"We're ready, willing and able," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., a former state attorney general. "I'm ready to go to court and try this case."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has delayed sending the two articles, which accuse Trump of abuse of power and obstruction Congress, until she learns more about how the Senate trial will be conducted.
A big sticking point between the two sides is whether witnesses will be allowed to testify during the Senate trial. Democrats have argued the trial should include witnesses who didn't testify during the House inquiry. But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., announced Tuesday he has the votes to begin the trial without making a decision on witnesses. But McConnell said he won't hold the vote until the Senate receives the articles.
McConnell said the trial rules would be modeled on those for former President Bill Clinton's trial in 1999. House managers, who serve as prosecutors, and White House lawyers, who serve as defense lawyers, would give opening statements. Then senators would submit questions to each side through Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who will preside. After those steps, senators could vote on witnesses.
McConnell:: GOP will move on without Democrats to set rules for Senate impeachment trial of Trump
Pelosi declined to comment Wednesday when reporters asked about sending the articles to the Senate. But she told fellow House Democrats in a letter Tuesday that McConnell should publish the rules the Senate will follow in the trial. She has argued she needs to know the rules in order to decide who and how many managers she should appoint to prosecute the case.
"It is important that he immediately publish this resolution, so that, as I have said before, we can see the arena in which we will be participating, appoint managers and transmit the articles to the Senate," Pelosi said.
But McConnell said Pelosi is waiting in order to gain an advantage in the trial.
"Supposedly the explanation for this shameless game-playing is that Speaker Pelosi wanted leverage – leverage to reach into the Senate and dictate our trial proceedings to us," McConnell said Wednesday. "Now I’ve made clear from the beginning that no such leverage exists. It is nonexistent. And yesterday we made clear it will never exist."
Blumenthal said now that Pelosi knows the plan, she should transmit the articles of impeachment to the Senate – even if she doesn't have the text of the rules.
“She knows what the plan is and she will have to make a judgement,” Blumenthal said.
Blumenthal: Some GOP 'have very severe misgivings' about McConnell impeachment strategy
He joined a growing list of Senate Democrats, including Sens. Dianne Feinstein of California, Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who have made similar comments that it’s time for the Senate to receive the articles.
“I think if we’re going to do it, we should do it,” said Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, who added that she didn’t understand what could be gained by a delay.
Murphy said the “best leverage” to gaining witnesses and documents in the trial was a “vote on the floor of the Senate."
“Pelosi's going to make her own decision, but I think that at this point, our best leverage to get witnesses and document production is inside the confines of the trial," Murphy said.
McConnell's announcement defused demands from Democrats such as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York that senators should vote before the trial starts on whether to hear testimony from witnesses. One of the potential witnesses, former national security adviser John Bolton, said Monday he would testify if subpoenaed.
The House accused Trump of abusing the power of his office by asking Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, withholding a White House meeting and $391 million in military aid. The House also accused Trump of obstructing Congress by directing aides and agencies to defy subpoenas for documents and testimony, although some officials did testify. The House approved the two articles of impeachment on Dec. 18.
Trump and congressional Republicans have argued he had the authority to set foreign policy and was justified in fighting corruption in Ukraine. Trump has said he expects to be exonerated in the Senate trial.


usatoday--2020-01-08--Here's who was standing next to President Trump when he addressed the Iran missile strike

President Donald Trump addressed the nation Wednesday afternoon after Iran launched a missile strike against two Iraqi airbases housing U.S. forces .
As Trump spoke , a group of military leaders and trusted advisers served as the backdrop in the White House 's Grand Foyer .
So , who are they ?
Flanked on either side of the president were Vice President Mike Pence , Secretary of State Mike Pompeo , Secretary of Defense Mark Esper , Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley , Gen. David Goldfein and the Army ’ s chief of staff Gen. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's what we know about Iran 's missile attack and its repercussions During the press conference , some Twitter users pointed out that the group was all men and all white .
“ Trump just presented an all-male , all-white national security team , ” said Kate Brannen , editorial director of Just Security , as part of a Twitter feed discussion .
Pentagon Press Secretary Alyssa Farah replied , saying comments about the team were “ unfair ” and “ diminishes the service of countless women in senior leadership ” in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ came under fire .
Iranians have said the attack was in response to the U.S. drone strike last week that killed one of Tehran ’ s most powerful leaders , Gen. Qasem Soleimani .
In his remarks , the president threatened Iran with additional sanctions while at the same time signaling the United States doesn ’ t seek a war with Tehran and is open to negotiations .
“ We must all work together toward making a deal with Iran that makes the world a safer and more peaceful place , ” Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a deal that allows Iran to thrive and prosper and take advantage of its enormous untapped potential .
”

Here’s who was standing next to President Trump when he addressed the Iran missile strike
Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump responds to Iran attack with 'new' sanctions President Donald Trump addressed the nation just hours after Iran rained more than a dozen rockets down on airbases in Iraq housing U.S. troops. USA TODAY
President Donald Trump addressed the nation Wednesday afternoon after Iran launched a missile strike against two Iraqi airbases housing U.S. forces.
As Trump spoke, a group of military leaders and trusted advisers served as the backdrop in the White House's Grand Foyer.
So, who are they?
Flanked on either side of the president were Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley, Gen. David Goldfein and the Army’s chief of staff Gen. James McConville.
Iran attack: Here's what we know about Iran's missile attack and its repercussions
During the press conference, some Twitter users pointed out that the group was all men and all white.
“Trump just presented an all-male, all-white national security team,” said Kate Brannen, editorial director of Just Security, as part of a Twitter feed discussion.
Trump just presented an all-male, all-white national security team.
My tweet is advocating for more female voices in national security, not fewer. But thanks for the smear! https://t.co/QyVkTk26mt — Kate Brannen (@K8brannen) January 8, 2020
Pentagon Press Secretary Alyssa Farah replied, saying comments about the team were “unfair” and “diminishes the service of countless women in senior leadership” in the Department of Defense.
Those comments also came under fire.
This is an unfair attacks that diminishes the service of countless women in senior leadership at @DeptofDefense. This week SecDef @EsperDoD named a female COS. We have a female Under Secretary of Defense, Assistant Secretaries of Defense & numerous Deputy Assist. Secs of Defense https://t.co/wNApqJ3Ev4 — Alyssa Farah (@Alyssafarah) January 8, 2020
This is Pentagon Press Secretary using an out-of-context tweet to attack a female national security journalist, who is obviously responding to Trump having only white men behind him at speech. A really bad look for DOD, especially considering lack of routine Pentagon briefings. https://t.co/bzhyUXjmLq — Susan Hennessey (@Susan_Hennessey) January 8, 2020
Iranians have said the attack was in response to the U.S. drone strike last week that killed one of Tehran’s most powerful leaders, Gen. Qasem Soleimani.
In his remarks, the president threatened Iran with additional sanctions while at the same time signaling the United States doesn’t seek a war with Tehran and is open to negotiations.
“We must all work together toward making a deal with Iran that makes the world a safer and more peaceful place,” Trump said. “We must also make a deal that allows Iran to thrive and prosper and take advantage of its enormous untapped potential.”
Follow Adrianna Rodriguez on Twitter: @AdriannaUSAT.


usatoday--2020-01-08--Republicans stand with Trump after Iran remarks while Democrats blame tensions on Soleimani killing

President Donald Trump sent a warning to Iran in an address to the nation Wednesday , but said the United States is prepared to work toward peace , after Iranian missile strikes attacked Iraqi military bases housing U.S. troops late Tuesday .
Iran was responding to the U.S.-ordered airstrike that killed top military general Qasem Soleimani late last week .
The nation had vowed severe retaliation , but Trump confirmed Wednesday that no Iraqi or American lives were lost in the missile attacks .
Trump said that the United States would be implementing a new round of sanctions against Iran @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He said he would ask NATO to `` become much more involved in the Middle East process . ''
Trump also blamed the Obama administration for entering into the nuclear agreement which he claimed funded the missiles used by Iran , urging other nations to withdraw .
Trump aides are conducting briefings on Iran with the House and Senate Wednesday .
Republicans immediately commended the president for his remarks , calling them `` presidential , '' while Democratic lawmakers repeated their accusations that Trump escalated tensions with Iran by ordering the killing of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's speech on Iran “ I think the president correctly described 40 years of bad behavior , provocative behavior .
destabilizing behavior and enough is enough .
You 're not going to get a nuclear weapon , ” Graham said he was supportive of the additional sanctions but added that the president has the authority to respond with force if needed to protect U.S. forces .
He said the president ’ s goals should be something that Republicans , Democrats and the world can get behind .
“ To the Iranian people and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a chance to end this peacefully .
He 's given you a chance for peace and prosperity , you should take it , ” Graham said of Trump ’ s speech .
Sen. James Inhofe , R-Okla. , said that Trump 's acts of deterrence against Iran is the reason it `` chose not to escalate further . ''
`` Whether Iran seizes this opportunity to negotiate or not , by killing Soleimani , President Trump has put us in the strongest position we 've had with Iran in decades , '' Inhofe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Paul of Kentucky , a Republican who has been outspokenly critical of Trump 's decision on Soleimani , said he was `` pleased '' that the Wednesday speech appeared to support the `` preferred path of no further military action . ''
`` I believe any further decisions on military action require a full debate and Congressional authority , '' Paul said .
`` I ’ m also pleased that he is engaging our allies to push Iran for a new , better deal .
We should all work together toward peace and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for our troops to come home from the Middle East , '' he said .
How Democrats responded to the Iran remarks And while Republicans saw the address as a sign Trump is leaning away from an escalation of war , some Democrats said Trump created the crisis to begin with .
`` This makes no sense .
Sanctions are economic warfare , '' Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar tweeted .
`` They have already caused medical shortages and countless deaths in Iran .
You can not claim to want deescalation and then announce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is not a measured response ! ''
Tom Steyer , a billionaire running for the Democratic presidential nomination , said that Trump 's `` recklessness '' was the cause of risk to American lives .
`` I 'm grateful that no Americans or Iraqis were harmed in last night 's missile strikes by Iran , '' Steyer tweeted .
`` Let 's make one thing clear : Trump created this crisis and his remarks today demonstrate , once again , that his go at it alone strategy makes our country less safe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , said that neither the U.S. nor Iran wants an escalation of conflict .
`` War with Iran and its proxies is not the answer .
I urge Iran to accept President Trump 's offer of dialogue and to work with us on shared objectives , '' Feinstein said in a statement .
`` This is the time for diplomacy .
Anything else does n't make sense . ''

Republicans stand with Trump after Iran remarks while Democrats blame tensions on Soleimani killing
Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump responds to Iran attack with 'new' sanctions President Donald Trump addressed the nation just hours after Iran rained more than a dozen rockets down on airbases in Iraq housing U.S. troops. USA TODAY
President Donald Trump sent a warning to Iran in an address to the nation Wednesday, but said the United States is prepared to work toward peace, after Iranian missile strikes attacked Iraqi military bases housing U.S. troops late Tuesday.
Iran was responding to the U.S.-ordered airstrike that killed top military general Qasem Soleimani late last week. The nation had vowed severe retaliation, but Trump confirmed Wednesday that no Iraqi or American lives were lost in the missile attacks.
Trump said that the United States would be implementing a new round of sanctions against Iran, but did not offer specifics. He said he would ask NATO to "become much more involved in the Middle East process." Trump also blamed the Obama administration for entering into the nuclear agreement which he claimed funded the missiles used by Iran, urging other nations to withdraw.
Trump aides are conducting briefings on Iran with the House and Senate Wednesday. Republicans immediately commended the president for his remarks, calling them "presidential," while Democratic lawmakers repeated their accusations that Trump escalated tensions with Iran by ordering the killing of Soleimani.
How Republicans responded to Trump's speech on Iran
Trump ally and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham called Trump's address "a homerun speech."
To the American people and Congress: What President Trump is seeking from Iran is to end 40 years of tyranny, to stop them from being a state sponsor of terrorism, and to abandon their nuclear weapons program once and for all. — Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) January 8, 2020
“I think the president correctly described 40 years of bad behavior, provocative behavior. destabilizing behavior and enough is enough. You're not going to get a nuclear weapon,”
Graham said he was supportive of the additional sanctions but added that the president has the authority to respond with force if needed to protect U.S. forces. He said the president’s goals should be something that Republicans, Democrats and the world can get behind.
“To the Iranian people and the regime: He's giving you a chance to end this peacefully. He's given you a chance for peace and prosperity, you should take it,” Graham said of Trump’s speech.
Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., said that Trump's acts of deterrence against Iran is the reason it "chose not to escalate further."
"Whether Iran seizes this opportunity to negotiate or not, by killing Soleimani, President Trump has put us in the strongest position we've had with Iran in decades," Inhofe wrote in a statement.
Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a Republican who has been outspokenly critical of Trump's decision on Soleimani, said he was "pleased" that the Wednesday speech appeared to support the "preferred path of no further military action."
"I believe any further decisions on military action require a full debate and Congressional authority," Paul said.
"I’m also pleased that he is engaging our allies to push Iran for a new, better deal. We should all work together toward peace and prosperity, to avoid war, and for our troops to come home from the Middle East," he said.
I believe that President Trump was very presidential and showed leadership and purpose. I support the President’s effort to negotiate with Iran from a position of strength and his vow to retaliate with military action if Americans or American assets are harmed. (1/2) — Richard Shelby (@SenShelby) January 8, 2020
Excellent address from @realDonaldTrump. The President showed a determined, forceful resolve while making it clear that America’s strongly preferred option is deescalation — not war. That’s leadership.
Let’s remain vigilant and get back to focusing on issues at home. — Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) January 8, 2020
Thankful to hear confirmation that no American troops were harmed in last night’s attack.
Iranian influence in the Middle East is a malign influence that has put in jeopardy not only American lives, but the lives of countless people throughout the region — Senator John Thune (@SenJohnThune) January 8, 2020
How Democrats responded to the Iran remarks
And while Republicans saw the address as a sign Trump is leaning away from an escalation of war, some Democrats said Trump created the crisis to begin with.
"This makes no sense. Sanctions are economic warfare," Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar tweeted. "They have already caused medical shortages and countless deaths in Iran. You cannot claim to want deescalation and then announce new sanctions with no clear goal. This is not a measured response!"
Tom Steyer, a billionaire running for the Democratic presidential nomination, said that Trump's "recklessness" was the cause of risk to American lives.
"I'm grateful that no Americans or Iraqis were harmed in last night's missile strikes by Iran," Steyer tweeted. "Let's make one thing clear: Trump created this crisis and his remarks today demonstrate, once again, that his go at it alone strategy makes our country less safe."
I’m grateful no Americans were hurt last night. The fact remains—we haven’t heard any long term strategy from President Trump on Iran. We must lower tensions in the region with diplomacy and Congress must exercise its oversight authority to prevent an unintended war. — Sen. Cory Booker (@SenBooker) January 8, 2020
Let me be clear: Trump is responsible for this crisis. He has shunned diplomacy since Day 1, filling his cabinet with warmongers and war hawks like Pompeo.
It's past time to return to diplomacy with our allies and repeal the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs to #StopEndlessWar. #NoWarWithIran https://t.co/S3BSzzfIB4 — Rep. Barbara Lee (@RepBarbaraLee) January 8, 2020
We must be clear-eyed about the threats that remain, and focused on a path forward that protects our interests and ensures our security. — Michael Bennet (@SenatorBennet) January 8, 2020
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif, said that neither the U.S. nor Iran wants an escalation of conflict.
"War with Iran and its proxies is not the answer. I urge Iran to accept President Trump's offer of dialogue and to work with us on shared objectives," Feinstein said in a statement. "This is the time for diplomacy. Anything else doesn't make sense."
Contributing: Nicholas Wu and Christal Hayes, USA TODAY


usatoday--2020-01-08--President Trump to Iran: 'terror, murder, mayhem will not be tolerated'

President Donald Trump addressed the Iranian regime after it rained more than a dozen missiles down on airbases in Iraq @ @ @ @

President Trump responds to Iran missile attack, seeks NATO help
President Donald Trump addressed the Iranian regime after it rained more than a dozen missiles down on airbases in Iraq housing U.S. troops.
USA TODAY


usatoday--2020-01-08--President Trump responds to Iran attack, seeking more sanctions and NATO involvement

President Trump responds to Iran attack with 'new ' sanctions President Donald Trump addressed the nation just hours after Iran @ @ @ @ @ rockets down on airbases in Iraq housing U.S. troops .

President Trump responds to Iran attack with 'new' sanctions
President Donald Trump addressed the nation just hours after Iran rained more than a dozen rockets down on airbases in Iraq housing U.S. troops.
USA TODAY


usatoday--2020-01-08--Iran's missile strike: A loud warning shot and an offer to de-escalate, sources say

WASHINGTON – Iran may have intentionally missed targets on bases in Iraq to avoid significant U.S. casualties and damage to infrastructure , according to U.S. government sources .
Iran appears to have fired the missiles into vacant areas where they were unlikely to cause significant harm , according to a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly .
The attack , the official said , was designed mainly for a domestic audience to show Iranians that the regime was responding to the killing last week of Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani .
The missile ’ s impact caused no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ source said .
The potential for mass casualties from an attack was real : More than 1,500 troops are housed at the two bases in western and northern Iraq .
In September , precision drone and missile strikes by Iranian-backed forces severely damaged oil production facilities in Saudi Arabia , supporting the belief that Iran has the capability to strike targets with lethal force .
That attack slashed Saudi oil production by destroying infrastructure .
The weapons used were Iranian , according to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo , and constituted an act @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not kill or wound any U.S. troops , President Donald Trump confirmed Wednesday in a live address to the nation .
He described the damage done by the missiles as `` minimal . ''
Iran , Trump said , `` appears to be standing down . ''
The strike Tuesday could have functioned as a very loud warning shot and may be an indication that the regime wants to limit escalation , said Michael O'Hanlon , a military analyst at the Brookings Institution .
The opening may be short-lived , he said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Pence have visited bases attacked by missiles '' They missed on purpose and want to de-escalate , '' O'Hanlon said , `` for the moment . ''
The Iranians know how to hit a target when they want to destroy it , said a U.S. official with knowledge of Iranian capabilities who was not authorized to speak publicly .
Such an attack would have caused `` grave damage , '' the official said .
It is possible that more moderate elements in the Iranian government are pushing for restraint , the official @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Capitol Hill said the Iranians deliberately chose their targets as a warning , not to inflict major damage .
Sen. Richard Blumenthal , D-Conn. , a member of the Armed Services Committee , said Wednesday there may be an opening for negotiation between the United States and Iran .
`` We have the opportunity to come back from the brink of war , '' Blumenthal said .
`` Purposely or inadvertently , the strikes caused a lot less damage than might have been expected . ''
Warning system works : US knew Iranian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump announces new sanctions Read his words : President Trump 's remarks on Iran from the White House The strikes involved more than a dozen guided missiles aimed at two bases in Iraq that house U.S.-led forces fighting Islamic State militants and helping to train Iraqi troops for combat .
At the sprawling al Assad air base in western Iraq , there are about 1,500 U.S. , Iraqi and allied forces .
Erbil , the other base , is in Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq .
The Iranian attack follows a drone strike last week @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Qasem Soleimani , the second-most powerful official in Iran and leader of forces that have been branded a terrorist organization by the United States .
Iran vowed revenge after that targeted killing , which the White House , State Department and Pentagon said was necessary to prevent imminent attacks on American forces in the region .
U.S.-Iranian tensions , already simmering after Iran shot down an American drone last summer , spiked Dec. 27 after Iranian-backed militias fired rockets at the U.S. base near Erbil and killed an U.S. contractor .

Iran's missile strike: A loud warning shot and an offer to de-escalate, sources say
Show Caption Hide Caption Iran fires missiles at bases housing U.S. troops in Iraq Iran fired missiles at two bases housing U.S. troops and coalition forces in Iraq in apparent retaliation for Gen. Qasem Soleimani's death. USA TODAY
WASHINGTON – Iran may have intentionally missed targets on bases in Iraq to avoid significant U.S. casualties and damage to infrastructure, according to U.S. government sources.
Iran appears to have fired the missiles into vacant areas where they were unlikely to cause significant harm, according to a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly. The attack, the official said, was designed mainly for a domestic audience to show Iranians that the regime was responding to the killing last week of Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani.
The missile’s impact caused no caused casualties and limited damage, the source said. The potential for mass casualties from an attack was real: More than 1,500 troops are housed at the two bases in western and northern Iraq.
In September, precision drone and missile strikes by Iranian-backed forces severely damaged oil production facilities in Saudi Arabia, supporting the belief that Iran has the capability to strike targets with lethal force. That attack slashed Saudi oil production by destroying infrastructure. The weapons used were Iranian, according to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and constituted an act of war.
Are we really ready for a World War III? Fears are mounting around the world following the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani - but is World War 3 about to happen? Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
Tuesday's attack did not kill or wound any U.S. troops, President Donald Trump confirmed Wednesday in a live address to the nation. He described the damage done by the missiles as "minimal."
Iran, Trump said, "appears to be standing down."
The strike Tuesday could have functioned as a very loud warning shot and may be an indication that the regime wants to limit escalation, said Michael O'Hanlon, a military analyst at the Brookings Institution. The opening may be short-lived, he said.
What we know about bases: Trump, Pence have visited bases attacked by missiles
"They missed on purpose and want to de-escalate," O'Hanlon said, "for the moment."
The Iranians know how to hit a target when they want to destroy it, said a U.S. official with knowledge of Iranian capabilities who was not authorized to speak publicly. Such an attack would have caused "grave damage," the official said. It is possible that more moderate elements in the Iranian government are pushing for restraint, the official said.
Another senior staff member on Capitol Hill said the Iranians deliberately chose their targets as a warning, not to inflict major damage.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., a member of the Armed Services Committee, said Wednesday there may be an opening for negotiation between the United States and Iran.
"We have the opportunity to come back from the brink of war," Blumenthal said. "Purposely or inadvertently, the strikes caused a lot less damage than might have been expected."
Warning system works: US knew Iranian missiles were coming ahead of strike; Trump announces new sanctions
Read his words: President Trump's remarks on Iran from the White House
The strikes involved more than a dozen guided missiles aimed at two bases in Iraq that house U.S.-led forces fighting Islamic State militants and helping to train Iraqi troops for combat. At the sprawling al Assad air base in western Iraq, there are about 1,500 U.S., Iraqi and allied forces. Erbil, the other base, is in Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq.
The Iranian attack follows a drone strike last week in Baghdad that killed Iranian Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani, the second-most powerful official in Iran and leader of forces that have been branded a terrorist organization by the United States. Iran vowed revenge after that targeted killing, which the White House, State Department and Pentagon said was necessary to prevent imminent attacks on American forces in the region.
U.S.-Iranian tensions, already simmering after Iran shot down an American drone last summer, spiked Dec. 27 after Iranian-backed militias fired rockets at the U.S. base near Erbil and killed an U.S. contractor.


usatoday--2020-01-08--'Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.' Read Donald Trump's remarks on Iran

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened Iran with a new round of sanctions but also appeared to offer Tehran an opening for negotiations following a major rocket attack on bases in Iraq a day earlier .
Here is a transcript of the president 's remarks from the White House : As long as I am President of the United States , Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon .
Good morning .
I 'm pleased to inform you : The American people should be extremely grateful and happy no Americans were harmed in last night @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We suffered no casualties , all of our soldiers are safe , and only minimal damage was sustained at our military bases .
Our great American forces are prepared for anything .
Iran appears to be standing down , which is a good thing for all parties concerned and a very good thing for the world .
No American or Iraqi lives were lost because of the precautions taken , the dispersal of forces , and an early warning system that worked very well .
I salute the incredible skill and courage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in uniform .
What did leaders know : US knew Iranian missiles were coming ahead of strike For far too long -- all the way back to 1979 , to be exact -- nations have tolerated Iran ’ s destructive and destabilizing behavior in the Middle East and beyond .
Those days are over .
Iran has been the leading sponsor of terrorism , and their pursuit of nuclear weapons threatens the civilized world .
We will never let that happen .
Last week , we took decisive action to stop a ruthless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my direction , the United States military eliminated the world ’ s top terrorist , Qasem Soleimani .
As the head of the Quds Force , Soleimani was personally responsible for some of the absolutely worst atrocities .
He trained terrorist armies , including Hezbollah , launching terrorist strikes against civilian targets .
He fueled bloody civil wars all across the region .
He viciously wounded and murdered thousands of U.S. troops , including the planting of roadside bombs that maim and dismember their victims .
Soleimani directed the recent attacks on U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ service members and killed one American , and he orchestrated the violent assault on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad .
In recent days , he was planning new attacks on American targets , but we stopped him .
Soleimani ’ s hands were drenched in both American and Iranian blood .
He should have been terminated long ago .
By removing Soleimani , we have sent a powerful message to terrorists : If you value your own life , you will not threaten the lives of our people .
As we continue to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the United States will immediately impose additional punishing economic sanctions on the Iranian regime .
These powerful sanctions will remain until Iran changes its behavior .
In recent months alone , Iran has seized ships in international waters , fired an unprovoked strike on Saudi Arabia , and shot down two U.S. drones .
Iran ’ s hostilities substantially increased after the foolish Iran nuclear deal was signed in 2013 , and they were given $ 150 billion , not to mention $ 1.8 billion in cash .
Instead of saying `` @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they chanted `` death to America . ''
In fact , they chanted `` death to America '' the day the agreement was signed .
Then , Iran went on a terror spree , funded by the money from the deal , and created hell in Yemen , Syria , Lebanon , Afghanistan , and Iraq .
The missiles fired last night at us and our allies were paid for with the funds made available by the last administration .
The regime also greatly tightened the reins on their own country , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many protests that are taking place all throughout Iran .
The very defective JCPOA expires shortly anyway , and gives Iran a clear and quick path to nuclear breakout .
Iran must abandon its nuclear ambitions and end its support for terrorism .
The time has come for the United Kingdom , Germany , France , Russia , and China to recognize this reality .
They must now break away from the remnants of the Iran deal -– or JCPOA –- and we must all work together toward making a deal with Iran @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more peaceful place .
We must also make a deal that allows Iran to thrive and prosper , and take advantage of its enormous untapped potential .
Iran can be a great country .
Peace and stability can not prevail in the Middle East as long as Iran continues to foment violence , unrest , hatred , and war .
The civilized world must send a clear and unified message to the Iranian regime : Your campaign of terror , murder , mayhem will not be tolerated any longer .
It will not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I am going to ask NATO to become much more involved in the Middle East process .
Over the last three years , under my leadership , our economy is stronger than ever before and America has achieved energy independence .
These historic accompliments [ accomplishments ] changed our strategic priorities .
These are accomplishments that nobody thought were possible .
And options in the Middle East became available .
We are now the number-one producer of oil and natural gas anywhere in the world .
We are independent , and we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The American military has been completely rebuilt under my administration , at a cost of $ 2.5 trillion .
U.S. Armed Forces are stronger than ever before .
Our missiles are big , powerful , accurate , lethal , and fast .
Under construction are many hypersonic missiles .
The fact that we have this great military and equipment , however , does not mean we have to use it .
We do not want to use it .
American strength , both military and economic , is the best deterrent .
Three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of ISIS and its territorial caliphate , we killed the savage leader of ISIS , al-Baghdadi , who was responsible for so much death , including the mass beheadings of Christians , Muslims , and all who stood in his way .
He was a monster .
Al-Baghdadi was trying again to rebuild the ISIS caliphate , and failed .
Tens of thousands of ISIS fighters have been killed or captured during my administration .
ISIS is a natural enemy of Iran .
The destruction of ISIS is good for Iran , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other shared priorities .
Finally , to the people and leaders of Iran : We want you to have a future and a great future -- one that you deserve , one of prosperity at home , and harmony with the nations of the world .
The United States is ready to embrace peace with all who seek it .
I want to thank you , and God bless America .
Thank you very much .
Thank you .
Thank you .

'Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.' Read Donald Trump's remarks on Iran
Show Caption Hide Caption Are we really ready for a World War III? Fears are mounting around the world following the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani - but is World War 3 about to happen? Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened Iran with a new round of sanctions but also appeared to offer Tehran an opening for negotiations following a major rocket attack on bases in Iraq a day earlier.
Here is a transcript of the president's remarks from the White House:
As long as I am President of the United States, Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.
Good morning. I'm pleased to inform you: The American people should be extremely grateful and happy no Americans were harmed in last night’s attack by the Iranian regime. We suffered no casualties, all of our soldiers are safe, and only minimal damage was sustained at our military bases.
Our great American forces are prepared for anything. Iran appears to be standing down, which is a good thing for all parties concerned and a very good thing for the world.
No American or Iraqi lives were lost because of the precautions taken, the dispersal of forces, and an early warning system that worked very well. I salute the incredible skill and courage of America’s men and women in uniform.
What did leaders know:US knew Iranian missiles were coming ahead of strike
For far too long -- all the way back to 1979, to be exact -- nations have tolerated Iran’s destructive and destabilizing behavior in the Middle East and beyond. Those days are over. Iran has been the leading sponsor of terrorism, and their pursuit of nuclear weapons threatens the civilized world. We will never let that happen.
Last week, we took decisive action to stop a ruthless terrorist from threatening American lives. At my direction, the United States military eliminated the world’s top terrorist, Qasem Soleimani. As the head of the Quds Force, Soleimani was personally responsible for some of the absolutely worst atrocities.
He trained terrorist armies, including Hezbollah, launching terrorist strikes against civilian targets. He fueled bloody civil wars all across the region. He viciously wounded and murdered thousands of U.S. troops, including the planting of roadside bombs that maim and dismember their victims.
Soleimani directed the recent attacks on U.S. personnel in Iraq that badly wounded four service members and killed one American, and he orchestrated the violent assault on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad. In recent days, he was planning new attacks on American targets, but we stopped him.
Soleimani’s hands were drenched in both American and Iranian blood. He should have been terminated long ago. By removing Soleimani, we have sent a powerful message to terrorists: If you value your own life, you will not threaten the lives of our people.
As we continue to evaluate options in response to Iranian aggression, the United States will immediately impose additional punishing economic sanctions on the Iranian regime. These powerful sanctions will remain until Iran changes its behavior.
In recent months alone, Iran has seized ships in international waters, fired an unprovoked strike on Saudi Arabia, and shot down two U.S. drones.
Iran’s hostilities substantially increased after the foolish Iran nuclear deal was signed in 2013, and they were given $150 billion, not to mention $1.8 billion in cash. Instead of saying "thank you" to the United States, they chanted "death to America." In fact, they chanted "death to America" the day the agreement was signed.
Then, Iran went on a terror spree, funded by the money from the deal, and created hell in Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Afghanistan, and Iraq. The missiles fired last night at us and our allies were paid for with the funds made available by the last administration. The regime also greatly tightened the reins on their own country, even recently killing 1,500 people at the many protests that are taking place all throughout Iran.
The very defective JCPOA expires shortly anyway, and gives Iran a clear and quick path to nuclear breakout. Iran must abandon its nuclear ambitions and end its support for terrorism. The time has come for the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and China to recognize this reality.
They must now break away from the remnants of the Iran deal -– or JCPOA –- and we must all work together toward making a deal with Iran that makes the world a safer and more peaceful place. We must also make a deal that allows Iran to thrive and prosper, and take advantage of its enormous untapped potential. Iran can be a great country.
Peace and stability cannot prevail in the Middle East as long as Iran continues to foment violence, unrest, hatred, and war. The civilized world must send a clear and unified message to the Iranian regime: Your campaign of terror, murder, mayhem will not be tolerated any longer. It will not be allowed to go forward.
Today, I am going to ask NATO to become much more involved in the Middle East process. Over the last three years, under my leadership, our economy is stronger than ever before and America has achieved energy independence. These historic accompliments [accomplishments] changed our strategic priorities. These are accomplishments that nobody thought were possible. And options in the Middle East became available. We are now the number-one producer of oil and natural gas anywhere in the world. We are independent, and we do not need Middle East oil.
The American military has been completely rebuilt under my administration, at a cost of $2.5 trillion. U.S. Armed Forces are stronger than ever before. Our missiles are big, powerful, accurate, lethal, and fast. Under construction are many hypersonic missiles.
The fact that we have this great military and equipment, however, does not mean we have to use it. We do not want to use it. American strength, both military and economic, is the best deterrent.
Three months ago, after destroying 100 percent of ISIS and its territorial caliphate, we killed the savage leader of ISIS, al-Baghdadi, who was responsible for so much death, including the mass beheadings of Christians, Muslims, and all who stood in his way. He was a monster. Al-Baghdadi was trying again to rebuild the ISIS caliphate, and failed.
Tens of thousands of ISIS fighters have been killed or captured during my administration. ISIS is a natural enemy of Iran. The destruction of ISIS is good for Iran, and we should work together on this and other shared priorities.
Finally, to the people and leaders of Iran: We want you to have a future and a great future -- one that you deserve, one of prosperity at home, and harmony with the nations of the world. The United States is ready to embrace peace with all who seek it.
I want to thank you, and God bless America. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.


usatoday--2020-01-08--Elizabeth Warren on 'The View': 'Of course' Soleimani was a terrorist

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren added to her public comments about the U.S.-ordered airstrike that killed Iranian military leader Qasem Soleimani after she was pressed by `` The View '' co-host Meghan McCain to acknowledge him as a `` terrorist . ''
`` Of course he was , '' Warren said after a tense back-and-forth with McCain , who asked the question multiple times .
The Democratic top-tier presidential hopeful addressed recent criticism that her message on the Soleimani killing ordered by President Donald Trump appeared to have changed , because she referred to him once as a `` murderer '' @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who was `` assassinated . ''
Both are true , Warren said Tuesday .
`` Soleimani was a murderer , responsible for the deaths of thousands , including hundreds of Americans , '' Warren tweeted after news of the airstrike surfaced .
`` But this reckless move escalates the situation with Iran and increases the likelihood of more deaths and new Middle East conflict .
Our priority must be to avoid another costly war . ''
Warren on the issues : The 2020 candidate shares her views on foreign policy , climate change @ @ @ @ @ @ @ later tweet , Warren said that Trump had `` escalated tensions '' with Iran .
`` Now he ’ s assassinated a senior foreign military official .
He ’ s been marching toward war with Iran since his first days in office—but the American people won ’ t stand for it . ''
`` I believe you respect the military and you respect our troops , '' McCain told Warren before reciting the multiple public statements .
`` I do n't understand the flip-flop .
I do n't understand why it was so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' `` This is n't a change .
They 're true , '' Warren said .
`` The question is , what is the response that the president of the United States should make , and what advances the interests of the United States of America . ''
McCain interrupted to ask Warren whether Soleimani was a terrorist .
`` He 's part of a group that 's been designated -- , '' Warren said before being interrupted .
`` But is he a terrorist ? ''
McCain interjected .
Warren began giving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said , `` So he 's not a terrorist ? ''
`` Of course he is , '' Warren said .
`` He 's part of a group that our federal government has designated as a terrorist .
The question , though , is what 's the right response ?
And the response that Donald Trump has picked is the most incendiary and has moved us to the edge of war . ''
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders , also a 2020 contender , used the word `` assassination '' to refer to Soleimani @ @ @ @ @ @ @ another 2020 Democrat , former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg , called that characterization `` outrageous . ''
`` This is a guy who had an awful lot of American blood on his hands , '' Bloomberg said in response to Sanders ' statement .
Trump ordered the killing of the influential Iranian figure late last week , which the Defense Department labeled a `` defensive action , '' and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo explained it as preventing an `` imminent '' threat against American diplomats and soldiers .
Warren has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strike , suggesting it is a `` reasonable question to ask '' whether Trump is trying to distract from impeachment in an interview with CNN on Sunday .
`` People are asking , why in this moment ? ''
Warren said .
`` The president of the United States could be facing an impeachment trial in the Senate .
We know that he 's deeply upset about that , '' she said .
`` My take on this is , Soleimani was a bad guy , but the question is , what 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on The View .
Warren also hit Trump for his tweet suggesting the United States would target Iranian cultural sites if the regime retaliated for Soleimani 's killing .
`` It would be a war crime if the United States did that , '' Warren said .
The president has since backed off that statement , saying Tuesday , `` I like to obey the law . ''
`` But think of it : They kill our people , they blow up our people and then we have to be very gentle with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ OK with it , '' Trump said .
`` He has moved us close to the edge of war .
He 's put our country on the edge of going to war .
We know that the Iranians are going to respond , '' Warren said .
`` The job of the president of the United States is to keep America safe , to have a coherent , long-term strategy , not to make compulsive decisions . ''
More : Trump backs off threat to attack Iranian cultural sites amid rising tensions after @ @

Elizabeth Warren on 'The View': 'Of course' Soleimani was a terrorist
Show Caption Hide Caption Iranian Americans in LA speak out on death of General Qasem Soleimani Iranian Americans in Los Angeles discuss Qasem Soleimani's death. Editor’s note: The video was edited to remove a family who mistakenly appeared on camera. Allison Zaucha, for USA TODAY
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren added to her public comments about the U.S.-ordered airstrike that killed Iranian military leader Qasem Soleimani after she was pressed by "The View" co-host Meghan McCain to acknowledge him as a "terrorist."
"Of course he was," Warren said after a tense back-and-forth with McCain, who asked the question multiple times.
The Democratic top-tier presidential hopeful addressed recent criticism that her message on the Soleimani killing ordered by President Donald Trump appeared to have changed, because she referred to him once as a "murderer" and then later as a government official who was "assassinated." Both are true, Warren said Tuesday.
"Soleimani was a murderer, responsible for the deaths of thousands, including hundreds of Americans," Warren tweeted after news of the airstrike surfaced. "But this reckless move escalates the situation with Iran and increases the likelihood of more deaths and new Middle East conflict. Our priority must be to avoid another costly war."
Soleimani was a murderer, responsible for the deaths of thousands, including hundreds of Americans. But this reckless move escalates the situation with Iran and increases the likelihood of more deaths and new Middle East conflict. Our priority must be to avoid another costly war. — Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) January 3, 2020
Warren on the issues: The 2020 candidate shares her views on foreign policy, climate change, health care and more
In a later tweet, Warren said that Trump had "escalated tensions" with Iran. "Now he’s assassinated a senior foreign military official. He’s been marching toward war with Iran since his first days in office—but the American people won’t stand for it."
"I believe you respect the military and you respect our troops," McCain told Warren before reciting the multiple public statements. "I don't understand the flip-flop. I don't understand why it was so hard to call him a terrorist."
"This isn't a change. They're true," Warren said. "The question is, what is the response that the president of the United States should make, and what advances the interests of the United States of America."
McCain interrupted to ask Warren whether Soleimani was a terrorist.
"He's part of a group that's been designated--," Warren said before being interrupted.
"But is he a terrorist?" McCain interjected. Warren began giving the same response, when McCain again said, "So he's not a terrorist?"
Are we really ready for a World War III? Fears are mounting around the world following the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani - but is World War 3 about to happen? Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
"Of course he is," Warren said. "He's part of a group that our federal government has designated as a terrorist. The question, though, is what's the right response? And the response that Donald Trump has picked is the most incendiary and has moved us to the edge of war."
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, also a 2020 contender, used the word "assassination" to refer to Soleimani's killing in a statement. But another 2020 Democrat, former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg, called that characterization "outrageous."
"This is a guy who had an awful lot of American blood on his hands," Bloomberg said in response to Sanders' statement.
Candidates respond: 2020 presidential contenders react to killing of Iranian military leader Qasem Soleimani
Trump ordered the killing of the influential Iranian figure late last week, which the Defense Department labeled a "defensive action," and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo explained it as preventing an "imminent" threat against American diplomats and soldiers.
Warren has questioned the president's timing for the strike, suggesting it is a "reasonable question to ask" whether Trump is trying to distract from impeachment in an interview with CNN on Sunday. "People are asking, why in this moment?" Warren said.
"The president of the United States could be facing an impeachment trial in the Senate. We know that he's deeply upset about that," she said.
Election 2020: As Soleimani killing jolts presidential race, Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders seize the moment
"My take on this is, Soleimani was a bad guy, but the question is, what's the right response?" Warren said on The View.
Warren also hit Trump for his tweet suggesting the United States would target Iranian cultural sites if the regime retaliated for Soleimani's killing. "It would be a war crime if the United States did that," Warren said.
The president has since backed off that statement, saying Tuesday, "I like to obey the law."
"But think of it: They kill our people, they blow up our people and then we have to be very gentle with their cultural institutions. But I'm OK with it," Trump said.
"He has moved us close to the edge of war. He's put our country on the edge of going to war. We know that the Iranians are going to respond," Warren said. "The job of the president of the United States is to keep America safe, to have a coherent, long-term strategy, not to make compulsive decisions."
More: Trump backs off threat to attack Iranian cultural sites amid rising tensions after Soleimani death


usatoday--2020-01-09--Senate Democrats grow impatient waiting for Pelosi to send articles for Trump impeachment trial


usatoday--2020-01-09--Lara Trump: Trump's Iran strategy is 'peace through strength' or could be 'hell to pay'

COLUMBUS — President Donald Trump won Ohio by 8 points in 2016 , but his re-election campaign so far has put a red circle around the Buckeye State .
Trump is scheduled to visit Toledo for his first campaign rally of 2020 on Thursday alongside Vice President Mike Pence , and his daughter-in-law and campaign adviser Lara Trump was a warm-up act in Columbus on Wednesday .
“ All roads to the White House run through Ohio , ” Lara Trump said during a speech to more than 300 of the president ’ s supporters at the Hilton Columbus at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doubt in my mind that Donald Trump is going to be re-elected for four more years.
” Limited powers ?
: Pelosi : House will vote to limit Trump 's war power amid 'urgent ' concerns on Iran strategy Speaking hours after Trump ’ s nationally televised address about the conflict with Iran , Lara Trump praised the administration ’ s killing of Gen. Qasem Soleimani while criticizing those who say Trump struggles to be “ presidential.
” In an interview before the rally , Lara Trump , who is married to Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ administrations ’ handling of Iran , saying they have dealt with problems in the Middle East “ by appeasing them.
” “ We have a very different strategy with this president .
It ’ s peace through strength , ” she told The Dispatch , noting that Trump has made it clear that there would be “ hell to pay ” if Iran took further action .
Between a smattering of chants of “ U.S.A. ” and “ four more years ” at the rally , Lara Trump alternated between praise for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Democratic primary field .
She accused Democrats of promoting socialism .
“ Every time I see some of these candidates , I say , ’ this is who they ’ re running for president really ?
’ It ’ s really scary to think that one of these individuals could end up in the White House.
” Only Democratic candidate former Vice President Joe Biden was mentioned by name , though .
“ Can you imagine if Donald Trump got to debate against Joe Biden ?
I sort of feel sorry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s how you know it ’ s not going well .
I ’ m supposed to be on the opposite team and every time he ’ s on stage I say , ’ oof , I hope he doesn ’ t mess something up here.
’ ” The Democratic challengers would have to overcome what Lara Trump said is the president ’ s booming economy , with more jobs , to win the election .
Ohio had its biggest job growth of 2019 in November , the most recent data available , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the year with fewer jobs .
Job growth in Ohio ranks 39th out of 50 states , according to the Seidman Research Institute at Arizona State University .
Trump ’ s campaign is visiting Ohio against the backdrop of impeachment , which has stalled in Congress after the historic vote in the House last month .
Speaker Nancy Pelosi hasn ’ t sent articles of impeachment to the Senate , and the Senate hasn ’ t set rules for a trial .
“ This impeachment was nonsense from the beginning , ” Lara @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact , she said it helped the campaign raise more money , raking in $ 46 million in the fourth quarter of 2019 .
“ They are desperate because they know what we know in this room – that this country is working for people again , ” she said .

Rick Rouan, Columbus Dispatch, USA TODAY

Lara Trump: Trump's Iran strategy is 'peace through strength' or could be 'hell to pay'
Show Caption Hide Caption Are we really ready for a World War III? Fears are mounting around the world following the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani - but is World War 3 about to happen? Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
COLUMBUS — President Donald Trump won Ohio by 8 points in 2016, but his re-election campaign so far has put a red circle around the Buckeye State.
Trump is scheduled to visit Toledo for his first campaign rally of 2020 on Thursday alongside Vice President Mike Pence, and his daughter-in-law and campaign adviser Lara Trump was a warm-up act in Columbus on Wednesday.
“All roads to the White House run through Ohio,” Lara Trump said during a speech to more than 300 of the president’s supporters at the Hilton Columbus at Easton. “There’s no doubt in my mind that Donald Trump is going to be re-elected for four more years.”
Limited powers?:Pelosi: House will vote to limit Trump's war power amid 'urgent' concerns on Iran strategy
Speaking hours after Trump’s nationally televised address about the conflict with Iran, Lara Trump praised the administration’s killing of Gen. Qasem Soleimani while criticizing those who say Trump struggles to be “presidential.”
In an interview before the rally, Lara Trump, who is married to Trump’s son Eric, ripped past administrations’ handling of Iran, saying they have dealt with problems in the Middle East “by appeasing them.”
“We have a very different strategy with this president. It’s peace through strength,” she told The Dispatch, noting that Trump has made it clear that there would be “hell to pay” if Iran took further action.
Between a smattering of chants of “U.S.A.” and “four more years” at the rally, Lara Trump alternated between praise for the president and rebukes of his potential opponents in the Democratic primary field. She accused Democrats of promoting socialism.
“Every time I see some of these candidates, I say, ’this is who they’re running for president really?’ It’s really scary to think that one of these individuals could end up in the White House.”
Only Democratic candidate former Vice President Joe Biden was mentioned by name, though.
“Can you imagine if Donald Trump got to debate against Joe Biden? I sort of feel sorry for him, guys. That’s how you know it’s not going well. I’m supposed to be on the opposite team and every time he’s on stage I say, ’oof, I hope he doesn’t mess something up here.’”
The Democratic challengers would have to overcome what Lara Trump said is the president’s booming economy, with more jobs, to win the election. Ohio had its biggest job growth of 2019 in November, the most recent data available, but it still was on pace to finish the year with fewer jobs.
Job growth in Ohio ranks 39th out of 50 states, according to the Seidman Research Institute at Arizona State University.
Trump’s campaign is visiting Ohio against the backdrop of impeachment, which has stalled in Congress after the historic vote in the House last month. Speaker Nancy Pelosi hasn’t sent articles of impeachment to the Senate, and the Senate hasn’t set rules for a trial.
“This impeachment was nonsense from the beginning,” Lara Trump said before the rally. In fact, she said it helped the campaign raise more money, raking in $46 million in the fourth quarter of 2019.
“They are desperate because they know what we know in this room – that this country is working for people again,” she said.