revolutionradio--2020-06-27--It’s Not About Masks or Health– It’s About POWER (Video)

In this informative video , Patriot Nurse discusses the well documented methodology of overlords dividing people to accomplish a political @ @ @ @ @ , every manner of division is being sown between colors , between generations , and @ @ @ @ @ working portions of the populace .
Overwhelming , the people giving medical advice have exceptionally @ @ @ @ @ economics and business .
The Constitution doesn ’ t just stop in a crisis .
@ @ @ @ @ to protect us from government during EXACTLY these times .
This entry was posted on @ @ @ @ @ 2020 at 2:46 pm and is filed under Conspiracy , Corruption , Government Evil , @ @ @ @ @ follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed .

BY PATRIOT NURSE
THEDAILYCOIN.ORG
JUNE 27, 2020
In this informative video, Patriot Nurse discusses the well documented methodology of overlords dividing people to accomplish a political end. Throughout the nation, every manner of division is being sown between colors, between generations, and between the working and non working portions of the populace. Overwhelming, the people giving medical advice have exceptionally poor understandings of civics, economics and business. The Constitution doesn’t just stop in a crisis. Indeed, it was drafted to protect us from government during EXACTLY these times.


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--SOCIAL CREDIT SCORES ARE ALREADY HERE

SOCIAL CREDIT SCORES ARE ALREADY HERE

PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD ARE ALREADY BEING JUDGED AND DENIED ACCESS TO FINANCIAL SERVICES BECAUSE OF THEIR SOCIAL MEDIA DATA — AND THEY DON ’ T EVEN REALIZE IT .
By now many of our readers are aware of the ongoing roll out of a nationwide social credit system in China .
Starting in 2009 , the Chinese government began testing a national reputation system based on a citizen ’ s economic and social reputation , or “ social credit.
” This social credit score can be used to reward or punish certain behaviors .
The idea is that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a social credit score in order to engineer good behavior from the people .
By late 2019 , Chinese citizens were losing points on their score for dishonest and fraudulent financial behavior , playing loud music , eating on public transportation , jaywalking , running red lights , failing to appear at doctor appointments , missing job interviews or hotel reservations without canceling , and incorrectly sorting waste .
To raise one ’ s social credit score a Chinese citizen can donate blood , donate to an approved charity , volunteer for community @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the government .
The Chinese government has begun to deny millions of people the ability to purchase plane and high-speed rail tickets due to low social credit scores and being labeled “ untrustworthy.
” While most people are likely familiar with this concept because of the popular show Black Mirror , the truth is this practice is much more reality than fiction .
According to a new report from cybersecurity experts Kaspersky , 32 percent of adults between 25 to 34 have had issues getting a mortgage or loan due to their social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comes as part of “ social scoring systems ” which are being used at an alarming rate by government and businesses to determine customers or citizens “ trustworthiness.
” “ Based on these scores , systems make decisions for us or about us , from travel destinations and the associated costs , to whether we are allowed to access the service itself , ” the report states .
Kaspersky surveyed more than 10,000 people from 21 countries and found that 18 percent of those polled had issues accessing financial services because of assessments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ report notes that more than 4.5 billion people use the internet around the world , and 3.8 billion have social media accounts .
These accounts provide governments and companies with thousands of data points to score people .
Less than half of those surveyed said they have heard of social scoring or social credit .
As few as 13 percent of those polled in Austria and Germany said they were familiar with the concepts , while 71 percent in China were familiar .
Unfortunately , the survey also found that 67 percent of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to secure online shopping discounts and 52 percent are willing if it means skipping lines at airports and other means of travel .
Finally , 51 percent of people said they are fine with government monitoring their social media behavior if it means keeping the public safe .
The post-9/11 indoctrination appears to have worked to an astounding degree .
Kaspersky warned that the public has little protections when it comes to their social media data , stating , “ there is no framework we are publicly aware of when it comes to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to collect our data.
” Further , the report states that consumers “ can find it impossible to find out what their scores are , how these scores are being calculated and how they can be corrected if there are inaccuracies.
” Chengyi Lin , a professor of strategy at the INSEAD business school , told EuroNews she believes , “ you ’ re gon na have a holistic view of your behaviours , both financial and digital , and even physical , to give you a single credit score.
” Lin ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of data and the push towards a single score by which governments will rate their populations .
When combined with facial recognition , biometrics at the airports , CCTV cameras , drones and surveillance planes flying above major cities — it is clear that the Technocratic State is coming into full view .
Clearly , the majority of people are completely in the dark about these programs and their dangerous implications .
Therefore , the goal for those “ in the know ” should be to spread the word and warn as many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take personal responsibility for the amount of data we voluntarily share with social media sites , apps , and the internet in general .
The only defense against the complete erosion of privacy — and thus liberty — is an educated public who stands up for their own rights .
Read the conclusions of the Kaspersky Report below : “ Consumers may find it a challenge to take a step back and remove their personal information from online and some real-world services .
Organizations are digitizing quickly and benefit from technology and consumer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world are considering a wider implementation of state monitoring systems for the stated purpose of ensuring public security .
Nevertheless , it ’ s not clear how much access to personal information and people ’ s lives governments would request in these cases .
The need for a compromise to show where the line is between public safety and control is becoming more crucial than ever .
Protecting privacy , both online and offline , is still possible , and Kaspersky advises consumers to take the following steps to safeguard themselves : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ account and history wherever possible when you stop using an app or online service .
Additionally , check which connected services have access to your personal accounts .
Our world is changing and that means every part of our lives could be measured and scored .
Use caution when sharing your personal information so that you are not denied a service for previous behavior .
Sharing behavior has its benefits but only with the right services .
An online survey may give you a discount off your favorite brand , but this may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you wanted them to know .
Remain vigilant about your online activities .
Social media is an integral part of our daily lives , so think twice before sharing your personal information online in case it could be misinterpreted or even used against you .
Question Everything , Come To Your Own Conclusions .
This entry was posted on Sunday , June 28th , 2020 at 8:36 am and is filed under Government Evil , New World Order , Police State , Population Control .
You can follow any responses to this entry @ @ @ @ @ @

BY DERRICK BROZE
TheLastAmericanVagabond.com
27 JUN 2020
PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD ARE ALREADY BEING JUDGED AND DENIED ACCESS TO FINANCIAL SERVICES BECAUSE OF THEIR SOCIAL MEDIA DATA — AND THEY DON’T EVEN REALIZE IT.
By now many of our readers are aware of the ongoing roll out of a nationwide social credit system in China. Starting in 2009, the Chinese government began testing a national reputation system based on a citizen’s economic and social reputation, or “social credit.” This social credit score can be used to reward or punish certain behaviors. The idea is that the state can give or takeaway points from a social credit score in order to engineer good behavior from the people.
By late 2019, Chinese citizens were losing points on their score for dishonest and fraudulent financial behavior, playing loud music, eating on public transportation, jaywalking, running red lights, failing to appear at doctor appointments, missing job interviews or hotel reservations without canceling, and incorrectly sorting waste. To raise one’s social credit score a Chinese citizen can donate blood, donate to an approved charity, volunteer for community service, and other activities approved by the government. The Chinese government has begun to deny millions of people the ability to purchase plane and high-speed rail tickets due to low social credit scores and being labeled “untrustworthy.”
While most people are likely familiar with this concept because of the popular show Black Mirror, the truth is this practice is much more reality than fiction. According to a new report from cybersecurity experts Kaspersky, 32 percent of adults between 25 to 34 have had issues getting a mortgage or loan due to their social media activity. The denial of loans comes as part of “social scoring systems” which are being used at an alarming rate by government and businesses to determine customers or citizens “trustworthiness.”
“Based on these scores, systems make decisions for us or about us, from travel destinations and the associated costs, to whether we are allowed to access the service itself,” the report states.
Kaspersky surveyed more than 10,000 people from 21 countries and found that 18 percent of those polled had issues accessing financial services because of assessments of their social media data. The report notes that more than 4.5 billion people use the internet around the world, and 3.8 billion have social media accounts. These accounts provide governments and companies with thousands of data points to score people. Less than half of those surveyed said they have heard of social scoring or social credit. As few as 13 percent of those polled in Austria and Germany said they were familiar with the concepts, while 71 percent in China were familiar.
Unfortunately, the survey also found that 67 percent of people are willing to share their profiles to secure online shopping discounts and 52 percent are willing if it means skipping lines at airports and other means of travel. Finally, 51 percent of people said they are fine with government monitoring their social media behavior if it means keeping the public safe. The post-9/11 indoctrination appears to have worked to an astounding degree.
Kaspersky warned that the public has little protections when it comes to their social media data, stating, “there is no framework we are publicly aware of when it comes to other systems used by organizations and governments to collect our data.” Further, the report states that consumers “can find it impossible to find out what their scores are, how these scores are being calculated and how they can be corrected if there are inaccuracies.”
Chengyi Lin, a professor of strategy at the INSEAD business school, told EuroNews she believes, “you’re gonna have a holistic view of your behaviours, both financial and digital, and even physical, to give you a single credit score.”
Lin’s comments point to an ever-increasing centralization of data and the push towards a single score by which governments will rate their populations. When combined with facial recognition, biometrics at the airports, CCTV cameras, drones and surveillance planes flying above major cities — it is clear that the Technocratic State is coming into full view.
Clearly, the majority of people are completely in the dark about these programs and their dangerous implications. Therefore, the goal for those “in the know” should be to spread the word and warn as many people as possible. We must also take personal responsibility for the amount of data we voluntarily share with social media sites, apps, and the internet in general. The only defense against the complete erosion of privacy — and thus liberty — is an educated public who stands up for their own rights.
Read the conclusions of the Kaspersky Report below:
“Consumers may find it a challenge to take a step back and remove their personal information from online and some real-world services. Organizations are digitizing quickly and benefit from technology and consumer data in new ways. Governments across the world are considering a wider implementation of state monitoring systems for the stated purpose of ensuring public security. Nevertheless, it’s not clear how much access to personal information and people’s lives governments would request in these cases. The need for a compromise to show where the line is between public safety and control is becoming more crucial than ever.
Protecting privacy, both online and offline, is still possible, and Kaspersky advises consumers to take the following steps to safeguard themselves:
Don’t forget to delete your account and history wherever possible when you stop using an app or online service. Additionally, check which connected services have access to your personal accounts.
Our world is changing and that means every part of our lives could be measured and scored. Use caution when sharing your personal information so that you are not denied a service for previous behavior.
Sharing behavior has its benefits but only with the right services. An online survey may give you a discount off your favorite brand, but this may lead to a company learning more than you wanted them to know. Remain vigilant about your online activities.
Social media is an integral part of our daily lives, so think twice before sharing your personal information online in case it could be misinterpreted or even used against you.
Question Everything, Come To Your Own Conclusions.


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--2020 Election Will Be A Contest Of The Angry

The old 2020 election was supposed to be about many familiar issues .
It is not any more .
Up until now , the candidates themselves would supposedly be the story in November .
The left had cited Trump ’ s tweets and erratic firings as windows into his dark soul .
The right had replied that an addled and befuddled Joe Biden was not really a candidate at all .
Instead he was a mere facsimile who would have to be carried to the Election Day on the shoulders of the Democratic party , only shortly to fade away @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could implement a hard-left agenda by succession what she could not through election .
Issues themselves are no longer likely to decide the election either .
Not long ago progressives argued that the miracle Trump economy was in shambles , done in by plague , quarantine and riot .
They thundered that it was what you would expect from Trump ’ s innate chaos — a mess that would have to be invented if it had not existed .
The right had countered that deregulation , energy development , tax reform and reindustrialization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Great — Again .
For all of 2019 and 2020 , Democrats had claimed that a calm abroad would return with a Biden win .
They talked of reestablishing the influence of postwar American-led diplomacy , soft power , traditional alliances , transnational organizations and the United Nations .
Trump Republicans believed all that was more the problem , not the solution .
They argued that America ’ s relationships with NATO , China and the European Union were now at least founded on reality , not dangerous fantasies and stale bromides .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a return to Washington normality : no more fights with the press , no more paranoia of a deep state , no more dissident generals , canned FBI leaders or exasperated CIA officials .
Trump ’ s base instead had seen the November election as the last chance to drain the federal swamp of careerists , apparatchiks , corporate flunkies and various grifters .
These unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats , lobbyists and revolving-door functionaries over the prior decades had hacked at the Bill of Rights , stagnated the economy , mired the nation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country to China .
But that conundrum is ancient history now .
For nearly a month , the nation has been consumed by massive protests and chronic riots , looting and arson .
The catalyst for the demonstrations — the violent and wrongful death of African American George Floyd while in the custody of Minneapolis police — is itself fading from connections with the ensuing upheavals .
Police are both reviled — and walking off the job .
Retired generals are no longer seen as conservative traditionalists but radicals themselves who dare to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is no longer in the control of the city government .
The internet is aflame with self-appointed sleuths .
They scour hours of video , and millions of words , searching for an indiscreet past remark — as fodder to take out a political opponent , a rival for a job or a personal enemy .
The people ’ s energy , tranquilized by a two-month national quarantine and terror of the coronavirus , has suddenly exploded in both massive protests and silent seething at the lawlessness .
The result is that for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is no longer really about Biden and Trump , Democratic or Republican policies , or progressive and conservative agendas .
No , it is now about America as it has been before May 2020 — always flawed , but constantly improving , and not perfect but far better than the alternatives — and what has now followed .
Much of the country believes that America is racist , cruel and incapable of self-correction of its so-called original sins — without a radical erasure of much of its past history , traditions and customs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ necessary stimulant of long overdue change .
It argues that the American founding focus on liberty and freedom as increasingly selfish and incompatible with social justice and equality .
Racism , the protesting left says , is in the American DNA .
It finally requires massive cutting , chemotherapy and radiation — treatment that deservedly will sicken and may even kill the host .
The other half of the country will vote to preserve what is under attack .
They feel that the dreamy world of the demonstrators and rioters is an Orwellian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they are protesting .
America in their view is the world ’ s only large , successful multiracial democracy .
It is the dream destination of the world ’ s immigrants — precisely because its ancient institutions adapt and change for the better , but only if they are preserved and allowed to work .
The angry and the demonstrating are loud and visible ; their opponents are angry and quiet .
The election will reveal not just who is more numerous — but sadly also who is the angriest .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 28th , 2020 at 8:21 am and is filed under Civil War II , Politics .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed .

by Victor Davis Hanson via RealClearPolitics.com,
ZeroHedge.com
Sat, 06/27/2020
The old 2020 election was supposed to be about many familiar issues. It is not any more.
Up until now, the candidates themselves would supposedly be the story in November. The left had cited Trump’s tweets and erratic firings as windows into his dark soul.
The right had replied that an addled and befuddled Joe Biden was not really a candidate at all.
Instead he was a mere facsimile who would have to be carried to the Election Day on the shoulders of the Democratic party, only shortly to fade away.
Then a radical vice president soon could implement a hard-left agenda by succession what she could not through election.
Issues themselves are no longer likely to decide the election either. Not long ago progressives argued that the miracle Trump economy was in shambles, done in by plague, quarantine and riot.
They thundered that it was what you would expect from Trump’s innate chaos — a mess that would have to be invented if it had not existed.
The right had countered that deregulation, energy development, tax reform and reindustrialization that made America Great would make American Great — Again.
For all of 2019 and 2020, Democrats had claimed that a calm abroad would return with a Biden win. They talked of reestablishing the influence of postwar American-led diplomacy, soft power, traditional alliances, transnational organizations and the United Nations.
Trump Republicans believed all that was more the problem, not the solution. They argued that America’s relationships with NATO, China and the European Union were now at least founded on reality, not dangerous fantasies and stale bromides.
Trump opponents saw the November election as a return to Washington normality: no more fights with the press, no more paranoia of a deep state, no more dissident generals, canned FBI leaders or exasperated CIA officials.
Trump’s base instead had seen the November election as the last chance to drain the federal swamp of careerists, apparatchiks, corporate flunkies and various grifters.
These unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats, lobbyists and revolving-door functionaries over the prior decades had hacked at the Bill of Rights, stagnated the economy, mired the nation in endless winless wars and mortgaged the country to China.
But that conundrum is ancient history now.
For nearly a month, the nation has been consumed by massive protests and chronic riots, looting and arson.
The catalyst for the demonstrations — the violent and wrongful death of African American George Floyd while in the custody of Minneapolis police — is itself fading from connections with the ensuing upheavals.
Statues are toppled. Names are abruptly changed. Careers cancelled.
Police are both reviled — and walking off the job. Retired generals are no longer seen as conservative traditionalists but radicals themselves who dare to take on the commander-in-chief.
Downtown Seattle is no longer in the control of the city government.
The internet is aflame with self-appointed sleuths. They scour hours of video, and millions of words, searching for an indiscreet past remark — as fodder to take out a political opponent, a rival for a job or a personal enemy.
The people’s energy, tranquilized by a two-month national quarantine and terror of the coronavirus, has suddenly exploded in both massive protests and silent seething at the lawlessness.
The result is that for good or evil, the 2020 election is no longer really about Biden and Trump, Democratic or Republican policies, or progressive and conservative agendas.
No, it is now about America as it has been before May 2020 — always flawed, but constantly improving, and not perfect but far better than the alternatives — and what has now followed.
Much of the country believes that America is racist, cruel and incapable of self-correction of its so-called original sins — without a radical erasure of much of its past history, traditions and customs.
It sees occasional violence as a necessary stimulant of long overdue change. It argues that the American founding focus on liberty and freedom as increasingly selfish and incompatible with social justice and equality.
Racism, the protesting left says, is in the American DNA. It finally requires massive cutting, chemotherapy and radiation — treatment that deservedly will sicken and may even kill the host.
The other half of the country will vote to preserve what is under attack. They feel that the dreamy world of the demonstrators and rioters is an Orwellian vision far worse than the present reality that they are protesting.
America in their view is the world’s only large, successful multiracial democracy. It is the dream destination of the world’s immigrants — precisely because its ancient institutions adapt and change for the better, but only if they are preserved and allowed to work.
The angry and the demonstrating are loud and visible; their opponents are angry and quiet.
The election will reveal not just who is more numerous — but sadly also who is the angriest.


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--Man is shot dead at Breonna Taylor protest in Louisville after gunman fires on demonstrators in Jeff

Man is shot dead at Breonna Taylor protest in Louisville after gunman fires on demonstrators in Jefferson Square Park in the city – sparking panic among protesters

One man was shot dead in the incident at Jefferson Square Park in downtown Louisville , Kentucky , at around 9 p.m. Saturday Disturbing footage on social media shows the moment the shooter aims his gun at the masses of people peacefully protesting and fires multiple shots It later shows people rushing to assist one person lying in a pool of blood Officers received a report of a second victim at the Hall of Justice who was taken to hospital with non-life threatening injuries The park has become a focal point for the city ’ s protests demanding justice for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down by cops in her apartment in March This is the second shooting during protests in Louisville over Taylor ’ s death Protesters nationwide are demanding an end to police brutality and systemic racism , and calls are mounting for widespread police reform In New York , hundreds of protesters camped outside City Hall Saturday night demanding lawmakers slash the New York City police budget by $ 1billion In Portland , Oregon , protesters tried to establish an autonomous zone outside a police precinct and cops warned riot control agents were being deployed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Breonna Taylor protest in Louisville after a white man opened fire on peaceful demonstrators in a crowded park , according to local police .
At least two people were shot – one fatally – in the incident at Jefferson Square Park in downtown Louisville , Kentucky , at around 9 p.m. Saturday .
Jefferson County Sheriff ’ s deputies performed life-saving measures on an unidentified male victim but he died at the scene .
The shooting took place at the park that has become a focal point for the city ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ black EMT who was gunned down by cops in her apartment back in March .
Disturbing footage on social media shows the moment the shooter aims his gun at the masses of people peacefully protesting and fires multiple shots .
Screams can be heard as people scramble for cover from the hail of bullets .
The footage later shows people rushing to assist one person who is seen lying in a pool of blood on the ground .
This entry was posted on Sunday , June 28th , 2020 at 8:12 am and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed .

One man was shot dead in the incident at Jefferson Square Park in downtown Louisville, Kentucky, at around 9 p.m. Saturday
Disturbing footage on social media shows the moment the shooter aims his gun at the masses of people peacefully protesting and fires multiple shots
It later shows people rushing to assist one person lying in a pool of blood
Officers received a report of a second victim at the Hall of Justice who was taken to hospital with non-life threatening injuries
The park has become a focal point for the city’s protests demanding justice for Breonna Taylor, the black EMT gunned down by cops in her apartment in March
This is the second shooting during protests in Louisville over Taylor’s death
Protesters nationwide are demanding an end to police brutality and systemic racism, and calls are mounting for widespread police reform
In New York, hundreds of protesters camped outside City Hall Saturday night demanding lawmakers slash the New York City police budget by $1billion
In Portland, Oregon, protesters tried to establish an autonomous zone outside a police precinct and cops warned riot control agents were being deployed
By RACHEL SHARP
DAILYMAIL.COM
28 June 2020
A man has been shot dead at a Breonna Taylor protest in Louisville after a white man opened fire on peaceful demonstrators in a crowded park, according to local police.
At least two people were shot – one fatally – in the incident at Jefferson Square Park in downtown Louisville, Kentucky, at around 9 p.m. Saturday.
Jefferson County Sheriff’s deputies performed life-saving measures on an unidentified male victim but he died at the scene.
The shooting took place at the park that has become a focal point for the city’s protests demanding justice for Taylor, the black EMT who was gunned down by cops in her apartment back in March.
Disturbing footage on social media shows the moment the shooter aims his gun at the masses of people peacefully protesting and fires multiple shots.
Screams can be heard as people scramble for cover from the hail of bullets.
The footage later shows people rushing to assist one person who is seen lying in a pool of blood on the ground.
The Rest…HERE


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--NYU Prof: “Hundreds, If Not Thousands” Of Universities Will Soon Be “Walking-Dead”

As colleges attempt to recover from the pandemic and prepare for future semesters , a New York University professor estimates that the next 5-10 years will see one to two thousand schools going out of business .
Scott Galloway , professor of marketing at the New York University Leonard N. Stern School of Business told Hari Sreenivasan on PBS ’ “ Amanpour and Co. ” that many colleges are likely to suffer to the point of eventual extinction as a result of the coronavirus .
He sets up a selection of tier-two universities as those most likely not to walk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pandemic , wealthy companies have not struggled to survive .
Similarly , he says , “ there is no luxury brand like higher education , ” and the top names will emerge from coronavirus without difficulty .
“ Regardless of enrollments in the fall , with endowments of $ 4 billion or more , Brown and NYU will be fine , ” Galloway wrote in a blog post .
“ However , there are hundreds , if not thousands , of universities with a sodium pentathol cocktail of big tuition and small @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this fall.
” “ You ’ re gon na see an incredible destruction among companies that have the following factors : a tier-two brand ; expensive tuition , and low endowments , ” he said on “ Amanpour and Co. , ” because “ there ’ s going to be demand destruction because more people are gon na take gap years , and you ’ re going to see increased pressure to lower costs.
” Approximating that a thousand to two thousand of the country ’ s 4,500 universities could go out of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Galloway concludes , “ what department stores were to retail , tier-two higher tuition universities are about to become to education and that is they are soon going to become the walking dead.
” Another critical issue underlying the financial difficulties families and universities both face is the possibility that the quality of higher education has decreased .
Galloway argues that an education in the U.S. is observably unsatisfactory for the amount that it costs , given that if you “ walk into a class , it doesn ’ t look , smell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 40 years ago , except tuition ’ s up 1,400 percent , ” he said during an interview with Dr. Sanjay Gupta .
And the pandemic , according to Galloway , has served to expose the quality of higher education .
“ Students I think across America along with their families listening in on these Zoom classes are all beginning to wonder what kind of value , or lack thereof , they ’ re getting for their tuition dollars , ” he said .
In the next six weeks , after receiving deposits/tuition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are moving to all online courses for Fall .
The scenario planning via Zoom among administrators rivals D-Day .
But likely all scenarios will lead to one realization : the protocols mandated by the surge in US infections will diminish the in-class experience to the point where the delta between in-person and Zoom will be less than the delta between the risks of each approach .
Parents and students may still decide to send their kids back to campus , and make their own decisions concerning the risks they can tolerate with a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on or near campus .
They should/will enjoy the lawns at UVA and Royce Quad with friends — marked for distancing .
But in-person classes should not take place .
Universities will face a financial crisis as parents and students recalibrate the value of the fall semester ( spoiler alert : it ’ s a terrible deal ) .
In addition , our cash cows ( international students ) may decide xenophobia , Covid-19 , and H1-B visa limits aren ’ t worth $ 79,000 ( estimated one-year cost of attending NYU ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coming and , similar to many industries , we will be forced to make hard decisions .
Most universities will survive , many will not .
This reckoning is overdue and a reflection of how drunk universities have become on exclusivity and the Rolex-ification of campuses , forgetting we ’ re public servants not luxury brands .
The outspoken professors ends with another uncomfortable truth : Universities that , after siphoning $ 1.5 trillion in credit from young people , can not endure a semester on reduced budgets do not deserve to survive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , June 28th , 2020 at 8:02 am and is filed under Communists , Pandemic .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed .

by Maria Copeland via CampusReform.org,
ZeroHedge.com
Sat, 06/27/2020
As colleges attempt to recover from the pandemic and prepare for future semesters, a New York University professor estimates that the next 5-10 years will see one to two thousand schools going out of business.
Scott Galloway, professor of marketing at the New York University Leonard N. Stern School of Business told Hari Sreenivasan on PBS’ “Amanpour and Co.” that many colleges are likely to suffer to the point of eventual extinction as a result of the coronavirus.
He sets up a selection of tier-two universities as those most likely not to walk away from the shutdown unscathed. During the pandemic, wealthy companies have not struggled to survive. Similarly, he says, “there is no luxury brand like higher education,” and the top names will emerge from coronavirus without difficulty.
“Regardless of enrollments in the fall, with endowments of $4 billion or more, Brown and NYU will be fine,” Galloway wrote in a blog post.
“However, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of universities with a sodium pentathol cocktail of big tuition and small endowments that will begin their death march this fall.”
“You’re gonna see an incredible destruction among companies that have the following factors: a tier-two brand; expensive tuition, and low endowments,” he said on “Amanpour and Co.,” because “there’s going to be demand destruction because more people are gonna take gap years, and you’re going to see increased pressure to lower costs.”
Approximating that a thousand to two thousand of the country’s 4,500 universities could go out of business in the next 5-10 years, Galloway concludes, “what department stores were to retail, tier-two higher tuition universities are about to become to education and that is they are soon going to become the walking dead.”
Another critical issue underlying the financial difficulties families and universities both face is the possibility that the quality of higher education has decreased.
Galloway argues that an education in the U.S. is observably unsatisfactory for the amount that it costs, given that if you “walk into a class, it doesn’t look, smell or feel much different than it did 40 years ago, except tuition’s up 1,400 percent,” he said during an interview with Dr. Sanjay Gupta.
And the pandemic, according to Galloway, has served to expose the quality of higher education.
“Students I think across America along with their families listening in on these Zoom classes are all beginning to wonder what kind of value, or lack thereof, they’re getting for their tuition dollars,” he said.
Here’s what Professor Galloway expects to happen:
In the next six weeks, after receiving deposits/tuition, more universities will begin announcing they are moving to all online courses for Fall. The scenario planning via Zoom among administrators rivals D-Day. But likely all scenarios will lead to one realization: the protocols mandated by the surge in US infections will diminish the in-class experience to the point where the delta between in-person and Zoom will be less than the delta between the risks of each approach.
Parents and students may still decide to send their kids back to campus, and make their own decisions concerning the risks they can tolerate with a hybrid experience — online learning while living on or near campus. They should/will enjoy the lawns at UVA and Royce Quad with friends — marked for distancing. But in-person classes should not take place.
Universities will face a financial crisis as parents and students recalibrate the value of the fall semester (spoiler alert: it’s a terrible deal). In addition, our cash cows (international students) may decide xenophobia, Covid-19, and H1-B visa limits aren’t worth $79,000 (estimated one-year cost of attending NYU). This has been a long time coming and, similar to many industries, we will be forced to make hard decisions. Most universities will survive, many will not. This reckoning is overdue and a reflection of how drunk universities have become on exclusivity and the Rolex-ification of campuses, forgetting we’re public servants not luxury brands.
The outspoken professors ends with another uncomfortable truth: Universities that, after siphoning $1.5 trillion in credit from young people, cannot endure a semester on reduced budgets do not deserve to survive.


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--Democrats in Orange County Want John Wayne’s Name Off Airport Over ‘Racist and Bigoted Statements’

The Democratic Party of Orange County in California wants to send the “ Duke ” riding off into the sunset for good .
Party leaders are demanding the removal of actor John Wayne ’ s name from the local airport due to the “ racist and bigoted statements ” that the Hollywood star made in a 1971 magazine interview .
In a resolution issued on Friday , they are calling for John Wayne Airport in Santa Ana to revert back to its original name , Orange County Airport .
“ Orange County is now a diverse region far different from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as namesake for the airport , ” the party said in its resolution .
There have been several attempts in recent years to rename John Wayne Airport .
But the latest effort from O.C .
Democrats is the first to invoke the recent Black Lives Matter protests , which have targeted historic statues and monuments around the country for destruction and removal .
“ A national movement to remove white supremacist symbols and names is reshaping American institutions , monuments , businesses , nonprofits , sports leagues and teams , ” the O.C @ @ @ @ @ @ @ widely recognized that racist symbols produce lasting physical and psychological stress and trauma particularly to Black communities , people of color and other oppressed groups.
” The party said the removal of racist symbols “ provides a necessary process for communities to remember historic acts of violence and recognize victims of oppression.
” John Wayne gave an interview to Playboy magazine in 1971 in which the Oscar-winning actor made comments that O.C .
Democrats now view as “ racist and bigoted.
” Here is the section of Wayne ’ s interview that has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a lot of blacks , there ’ s quite a bit of resentment along with their dissent , and possibly rightfully so .
But we can ’ t all of a sudden get down on our knees and turn everything over to the leadership of the blacks .
I believe in white supremacy until the blacks are educated to a point of responsibility .
I don ’ t believe in giving authority and positions of leadership and judgment to irresponsible people.
” In the 1971 interview , Wayne described the movie Midnight Cowboy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ f*gs.
” The Western star was also asked if he felt empathy for Native Americans .
“ I don ’ t feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them , if that ’ s what you ’ re asking .
Our so-called stealing of this country from them was just a matter of survival .
There were great numbers of people who needed new land , and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.
” John Wayne Airport was given its current name in 1979 in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ died that year and was a local resident .
It is the largest airport in Orange County , which owns and operates it .
The O.C .
was once a Republican stronghold .
But it turned blue during the 2018 midterm elections , with all of its congressional districts now represented by Democrats .
This entry was posted on Sunday , June 28th , 2020 at 7:53 am and is filed under Communists .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed .

by DAVID NG
BREITBART.COM
27 Jun 2020
The Democratic Party of Orange County in California wants to send the “Duke” riding off into the sunset for good.
Party leaders are demanding the removal of actor John Wayne’s name from the local airport due to the “racist and bigoted statements” that the Hollywood star made in a 1971 magazine interview.
In a resolution issued on Friday, they are calling for John Wayne Airport in Santa Ana to revert back to its original name, Orange County Airport.
“Orange County is now a diverse region far different from the time when John Wayne was chosen as namesake for the airport,” the party said in its resolution.
There have been several attempts in recent years to rename John Wayne Airport. But the latest effort from O.C. Democrats is the first to invoke the recent Black Lives Matter protests, which have targeted historic statues and monuments around the country for destruction and removal.
“A national movement to remove white supremacist symbols and names is reshaping American institutions, monuments, businesses, nonprofits, sports leagues and teams,” the O.C. Democrats said. “It is widely recognized that racist symbols produce lasting physical and psychological stress and trauma particularly to Black communities, people of color and other oppressed groups.”
The party said the removal of racist symbols “provides a necessary process for communities to remember historic acts of violence and recognize victims of oppression.”
John Wayne gave an interview to Playboy magazine in 1971 in which the Oscar-winning actor made comments that O.C. Democrats now view as “racist and bigoted.”
Here is the section of Wayne’s interview that has incited the most controversy:
“With a lot of blacks, there’s quite a bit of resentment along with their dissent, and possibly rightfully so. But we can’t all of a sudden get down on our knees and turn everything over to the leadership of the blacks. I believe in white supremacy until the blacks are educated to a point of responsibility. I don’t believe in giving authority and positions of leadership and judgment to irresponsible people.”
O.C. Democrats also called Wayne “anti-LGBT” and “anti-Indigenous.”
In the 1971 interview, Wayne described the movie Midnight Cowboy as a “a story about two f*gs.” The Western star was also asked if he felt empathy for Native Americans.
“I don’t feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them, if that’s what you’re asking. Our so-called stealing of this country from them was just a matter of survival. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.”
John Wayne Airport was given its current name in 1979 in honor of the True Grit actor who died that year and was a local resident. It is the largest airport in Orange County, which owns and operates it.
The O.C. was once a Republican stronghold. But it turned blue during the 2018 midterm elections, with all of its congressional districts now represented by Democrats.


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--Is US Debt Really $90 Trillion? – Mark Skidmore

Three years ago , Michigan State Economics Professor Mark Skidmore revealed there was $ 21 trillion in what he calls “ Missing Money ” from the Department of Defense ( DOD ) and Housing and Urban Development ( HUD ) .
This was a stunning revelation and the biggest auditing discovery in the history of accounting , but now this revelation comes in second with Dr. Skidmore ’ s latest update to the “ Missing Money ” question which is now the biggest in history by a long shot .
Skidmore ’ s research reveals the US Treasury market is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the official debt of $ 22 trillion ( 2019 ) .
Why do you need to churn $ 90 trillion in debt ?
Is the US debt really $ 90 trillion ?
Skidmore says , “ It ’ s not that we are moving to short term debt that would need more turn over .
That ’ s not it .
The only other explanation I can come up with is that the federal government , the Treasury , is supporting more debt with the reissuance than is officially recognized .
I am @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a look at this and tell me if there is some other possible explanation .
I don ’ t know of one .
.
.
.
This is a discrepancy .
Why do we have $ 22 trillion in debt , but $ 90 trillion in reissuance ?
” Skidmore goes on to say , “ It ’ s possible that over the years , we spent a lot more money than is acknowledged .
The implications of that are very important .
Is it fraud ?
I have tried really hard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s been quite an experience .
This make you question the structure of the system .
Is this fraud ?
I have to be able to prove it , but I have documents that say something is really , really wrong , and it ’ s not just bad accounting.
” What could go wrong with this much hidden debt ?
Skidmore says , “ Yes , it is concerning to me because this could blow up .
We don ’ t know when or how , but if people lose confidence in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the currency .
That could have severe impacts on lots of people in the whole global economy above and beyond what we are experiencing now .
.
.
.
Is there some reset in play ?
Is there some bigger issue at stake ?
Is this pulling away with other goals in mind ?
Yes , I think so .
I don ’ t know how this all fits together , but I do know there is something else going on that we all need to pay attention to .
Join Greg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with Economics Professor Mark Skidmore from Michigan State University .
This entry was posted on Sunday , June 28th , 2020 at 7:46 am and is filed under Conspiracy , Corruption , Economics , Government Evil .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed .

By Greg Hunter
USAWatchdog.com
June 28, 2020
Three years ago, Michigan State Economics Professor Mark Skidmore revealed there was $21 trillion in what he calls “Missing Money” from the Department of Defense (DOD) and Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This was a stunning revelation and the biggest auditing discovery in the history of accounting, but now this revelation comes in second with Dr. Skidmore’s latest update to the “Missing Money” question which is now the biggest in history by a long shot. Skidmore’s research reveals the US Treasury market is rolling over $90 trillion to support the official debt of $22 trillion (2019). Why do you need to churn $90 trillion in debt? Is the US debt really $90 trillion? Skidmore says, “It’s not that we are moving to short term debt that would need more turn over. That’s not it. The only other explanation I can come up with is that the federal government, the Treasury, is supporting more debt with the reissuance than is officially recognized. I am floating this around and asking people to have a look at this and tell me if there is some other possible explanation. I don’t know of one. . . . This is a discrepancy. Why do we have $22 trillion in debt, but $90 trillion in reissuance?”
Skidmore goes on to say, “It’s possible that over the years, we spent a lot more money than is acknowledged. The implications of that are very important. Is it fraud? I have tried really hard to get information, and it’s been quite an experience. This make you question the structure of the system. Is this fraud? I have to be able to prove it, but I have documents that say something is really, really wrong, and it’s not just bad accounting.”
What could go wrong with this much hidden debt? Skidmore says, “Yes, it is concerning to me because this could blow up. We don’t know when or how, but if people lose confidence in our government, they could lose confidence in the currency. That could have severe impacts on lots of people in the whole global economy above and beyond what we are experiencing now. . . . Is there some reset in play? Is there some bigger issue at stake? Is this pulling away with other goals in mind? Yes, I think so. I don’t know how this all fits together, but I do know there is something else going on that we all need to pay attention to.
Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he goes One-on-One with Economics Professor Mark Skidmore from Michigan State University.


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--Gab CEO Warns VIsa Is Helping To Bring China’s “Social Credit Score” To America

A little over a week after getting blacklisted by Visa simply for being associated with Gab , a social media alternative that ’ s committed to the principles of free speech , Andrew Torba , Gab ’ s CEO , has just spoken out for the first time via a blog post detailing his experiences .
His account is almost shocking in that , as Torba argues , it shows that US corporations like Visa have started to create their own version of China ’ s “ social credit score ” metric in the US .
If you ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be silenced , fired and harassed by major corporations , journalists and “ activists ” who claim to be committed to social justice and equality .
As Torba explains , because he refuses to censor hate speech on his platform in keeping with his commitment to making Gab a censorship-free platform , Visa has targeted him , and accused him of “ breaking the law ” – even though “ hate speech ” is protected under the First Amendment .
Visa has effectively cut Torba off from the dollar-based financial system .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ at this point , probably involves crypto .
This level of prosecution should make Christians and conservatives nervous , as they have seen these tactics from the left before .
And the results last time around…well…they weren ’ t pretty…no matter what American millennials might believe .
As many of you already know we learned last week that Visa blacklisted Gab and we are now unable to process credit and debit card transactions .
We learned more information this week and I think it ’ s important that I share it as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not just Gab that is blacklisted .
It ’ s also my family .
In China there is something called the Social Credit System , which was developed by the Communist Chinese Party as a “ national reputation system.
” This system tracks the “ trustworthiness ” of individuals , businesses , and organizations .
“ Trustworthiness ” here means total and complete submission to the Chinese Communist Party .
If the Communist Party deems you to be untrustworthy , you are denied access to plane tickets , train tickets , opening and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of June 2019 , according to the National Development and Reform Commission of China , 26.82 million air tickets as well as 5.96 million high-speed rail tickets have been denied to people who were deemed “ untrustworthy ( 失信 ) ” ( on a blacklist ) , and 4.37 million “ untrustworthy ” people have chosen to fulfill their duties required by the law .
To most Americans this sounds horrifying , and it is .
I now know from first-hand experience because this social credit system exists in the United States .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States government , it most certainly has been deployed by US corporations who today have in many ways more power , data , and control over our lives than our government does .
Many of these corporations also happen to be endorsing and raising money for communist organizations , revolutionaries , and the domestic terrorists burning down our cities .
We were told this week that not only is Gab blacklisted by Visa as a business , but my personal name , phone number , address , and more are all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wanted to leave Gab tomorrow ( something that isn ’ t going to happen ) and start a lemonade stand I wouldn ’ t be able to obtain merchant processing for it .
Simply because my name is Andrew Torba .
If my wife wants to start a business she won ’ t be able to obtain merchant processing because she lives at the same address as me and would be flagged by Visa .
This is obviously very concerning .
We have done nothing wrong .
Gab is and always has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hats , shirts , and a software subscription service that unlocks new features on Gab .
My personal credit score is in the 800 ’ s .
I pay my bills .
I have a wife and daughter to provide for , yet we are all being punished and defamed because someone at Visa has it out for me .
We were told that Visa has someone camping on our website watching our payment processing .
As soon as we get a new processor up they find out who it is on their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the processor that Gab is flagged for “ illegal activity ” and if they do not stop processing payments for us they will be heavily fined .
When the processor inquires about this alleged “ illegal activity , ” Visa tells them that Gab has been flagged for “ hate speech.
” “ Hate speech , ” is of course not illegal in the United States of America and is protected by the First Amendment .
As I have written , it ’ s not real and I refuse to acknowledge it as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with me .
The reason I share all of this is that I hope it serves as a wakeup call and as a warning .
If they can do this to me , they can do it to you and they likely will .
Christians need to be especially concerned and aware of this .
The Communist revolutionaries taking over the United States are coming for us all .
It ’ s only a matter of time before the Bible is labeled as “ hate speech ” and churches start to experience what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And that no man might buy or sell , save he that had the mark , or the name of the beast , or the number of his name .
Revelation 13:17 This entry was posted on Sunday , June 28th , 2020 at 1:44 am and is filed under Communists , Conspiracy , Corruption , End Times , New World Order , Population Control .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed .

by Tyler Durden
ZeroHedge.com
Sat, 06/27/2020
A little over a week after getting blacklisted by Visa simply for being associated with Gab, a social media alternative that’s committed to the principles of free speech, Andrew Torba, Gab’s CEO, has just spoken out for the first time via a blog post detailing his experiences. His account is almost shocking in that, as Torba argues, it shows that US corporations like Visa have started to create their own version of China’s “social credit score” metric in the US.
If you’re deemed “politically incorrect”, you will be silenced, fired and harassed by major corporations, journalists and “activists” who claim to be committed to social justice and equality. As Torba explains, because he refuses to censor hate speech on his platform in keeping with his commitment to making Gab a censorship-free platform, Visa has targeted him, and accused him of “breaking the law” – even though “hate speech” is protected under the First Amendment.
Visa has effectively cut Torba off from the dollar-based financial system. His easiest means of transacting digitally, at this point, probably involves crypto.
This level of prosecution should make Christians and conservatives nervous, as they have seen these tactics from the left before. And the results last time around…well…they weren’t pretty…no matter what American millennials might believe.
* * *
As many of you already know we learned last week that Visa blacklisted Gab and we are now unable to process credit and debit card transactions. We learned more information this week and I think it’s important that I share it as a warning for others.
It’s not just Gab that is blacklisted. It’s also my family.
In China there is something called the Social Credit System, which was developed by the Communist Chinese Party as a “national reputation system.” This system tracks the “trustworthiness” of individuals, businesses, and organizations. “Trustworthiness” here means total and complete submission to the Chinese Communist Party. If the Communist Party deems you to be untrustworthy, you are denied access to plane tickets, train tickets, opening and operating businesses, and more.
As of June 2019, according to the National Development and Reform Commission of China, 26.82 million air tickets as well as 5.96 million high-speed rail tickets have been denied to people who were deemed “untrustworthy (失信)” (on a blacklist), and 4.37 million “untrustworthy” people have chosen to fulfill their duties required by the law.
To most Americans this sounds horrifying, and it is. I now know from first-hand experience because this social credit system exists in the United States. While it may not be sanctioned by the United States government, it most certainly has been deployed by US corporations who today have in many ways more power, data, and control over our lives than our government does. Many of these corporations also happen to be endorsing and raising money for communist organizations, revolutionaries, and the domestic terrorists burning down our cities.
We were told this week that not only is Gab blacklisted by Visa as a business, but my personal name, phone number, address, and more are all also blacklisted by Visa. If I wanted to leave Gab tomorrow (something that isn’t going to happen) and start a lemonade stand I wouldn’t be able to obtain merchant processing for it. Simply because my name is Andrew Torba. If my wife wants to start a business she won’t be able to obtain merchant processing because she lives at the same address as me and would be flagged by Visa.
This is obviously very concerning. We have done nothing wrong. Gab is and always has been a legally operated business. We sell hats, shirts, and a software subscription service that unlocks new features on Gab. My personal credit score is in the 800’s. I pay my bills. I have a wife and daughter to provide for, yet we are all being punished and defamed because someone at Visa has it out for me.
We were told that Visa has someone camping on our website watching our payment processing. As soon as we get a new processor up they find out who it is on their end and contact them. They tell the processor that Gab is flagged for “illegal activity” and if they do not stop processing payments for us they will be heavily fined.
When the processor inquires about this alleged “illegal activity,” Visa tells them that Gab has been flagged for “hate speech.” “Hate speech,” is of course not illegal in the United States of America and is protected by the First Amendment. As I have written, it’s not real and I refuse to acknowledge it as term. Visa doesn’t agree with me.
The reason I share all of this is that I hope it serves as a wakeup call and as a warning. If they can do this to me, they can do it to you and they likely will.
Christians need to be especially concerned and aware of this. The Communist revolutionaries taking over the United States are coming for us all. It’s only a matter of time before the Bible is labeled as “hate speech” and churches start to experience what I am going through right now.
And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Revelation 13:17
* * *
Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab.com
June 26th, 2020
* * *


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--More Concrete Evidence of an Intended Purge Against Conservative Americans by the Would-Be Biden Adm

More Concrete Evidence of an Intended Purge Against Conservative Americans by the Would-Be Biden Administration

enemies .
The two key officials are former Presidential candidate , Senator Kamala Harris , and former Senior White House advisor , Valerie Jarrett .
Both prominent Democrats are proven criminals and both are reportedly being considered as a running mate for Joe Biden , or at minimum as senior level cabinet officials .
.
The statements of these two Democrats signal an intention to commit a purge against American conservatives for whom these two perceive as political opposition .
The current and past statements of these two Democratic women are very Gestapo-like and should make every American shudder in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threat of a purge against conservative Americans who dared to oppose the communist politics of these two , one has to decide how much weight to give tho their statements .
Below , an analysis is provided to the communist threat posed by these two public figures .
When one considers Biden ’ s recent threat to classify Christians as terrorists , it is time to take seriously the real possibility that a purge will take place if and when the Democrats ( ie communists ) take control of the White House .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Opponents When Democrats Take Back the White House The following has been vetted and it is so disturbing because this statement comes from a sitting United States Senator and the former Attorney General of California .
Clearly Harris ’ statement promises revenge on those who supported Trump as they will be hunted down , a purge-to-come if you will .
This entry was posted on Sunday , June 28th , 2020 at 3:00 pm and is filed under Civil War II , Communists , Government Evil .
You can follow any responses to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

by Dave Hodges
TheCommonSenseShow.com
Sunday, June 28, 2020
enemies. The two key officials are former Presidential candidate, Senator Kamala Harris, and former Senior White House advisor, Valerie Jarrett. Both prominent Democrats are proven criminals and both are reportedly being considered as a running mate for Joe Biden, or at minimum as senior level cabinet officials. .
The statements of these two Democrats signal an intention to commit a purge against American conservatives for whom these two perceive as political opposition. The current and past statements of these two Democratic women are very Gestapo-like and should make every American shudder in this shoes.
When one considers the threat of a purge against conservative Americans who dared to oppose the communist politics of these two, one has to decide how much weight to give tho their statements. Below, an analysis is provided to the communist threat posed by these two public figures. When one considers Biden’s recent threat to classify Christians as terrorists, it is time to take seriously the real possibility that a purge will take place if and when the Democrats (ie communists) take control of the White House.
Kamala Harris Threatening to Hunt Down Political Opponents When Democrats Take Back the White House
The following has been vetted and it is so disturbing because this statement comes from a sitting United States Senator and the former Attorney General of California. Clearly Harris’ statement promises revenge on those who supported Trump as they will be hunted down, a purge-to-come if you will.
The Rest…HERE


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--Pay-As-You-Go Government Is Precious Metals Paradise

The creators of Medicare , Social Security , and other long-term spending programs had a handle on demographics – or at least on the political realities of the time – so they structured those programs to initially take in more money than they needed in order to build up “ trust funds ” to cover the eventual retirement of the massive Baby Boomer generation .
The alternative to trust-fund entitlements is “ pay as you go , ” which makes such programs nice and cheap in the beginning and vastly more expensive later on .
This prospect used to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ became the conventional wisdom .
But those days are apparently over .
The most recent Congressional Budget Office projections show the Highway Trust Fund running out in 2021 and the much bigger Medicare Trust Fund emptying in 2023 .
Social Security is projected to run out by 2030 , but since those numbers were run before the pandemic slashed payments into the system , it ’ s safe to assume that Social Security ’ s trust fund evaporates circa 2027 .
What happens when the various trust funds run out ?
The costs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issue ” to “ cash flow issue.
” Taxes and/or deficits will rise dramatically as boomers move through their 70s and 80s , racking up massive medical bills along the way .
For a sense of just how big this change will be , here are a few fun facts : In the early days of Social Security , 42 people were paying into the system for every 1 receiving benefits .
Soon the ratio will be 2:1 The average early recipient received only a few years of payments before dying in their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ risen , 20 years of benefits are now to be expected for most recipients , meaning that they ’ ll draw far more from Social Security and Medicare than they paid in .
There ’ s no demographic cavalry – in the form of younger workers — riding to the rescue .
Birth rates are plunging in the developed world .
Minus immigration , the US is now below replacement rate , meaning that the native born population is shrinking rather than growing .
( This is great for the environment and housing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tax revenues . )
An optimist might note that all this new entitlement spending will at least be stimulative .
But even that might not be true this time .
The following chart , snagged from a recent Katusa Research article , shows that the velocity of money – the rate at which an existing dollar changes hands via spending – has been plunging lately ( from an already historically-low level ) .
So the past few years ’ massive deficits and Federal Reserve currency printing have done nothing for spending .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ growth has a name : stagflation .
And based on America ’ s last experience with it in the 1970s , it ’ s a hard time to feed a family but a spectacular time to own gold and silver .
This is what silver did back then .
We ’ re already in the early stages of a precious metals bull market .
Here ’ s another Katusa chart showing how gold is crushing stocks so far in 2020 .
So if we can ’ t stop the massive deficits and rampant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ embrace the resulting stagflation and keep stacking .
This entry was posted on Sunday , June 28th , 2020 at 2:53 pm and is filed under Economics , Survival .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed .

by John Rubino via DollarCollapse.com,
ZeroHedge.com
Sun, 06/28/2020
The creators of Medicare, Social Security, and other long-term spending programs had a handle on demographics – or at least on the political realities of the time – so they structured those programs to initially take in more money than they needed in order to build up “trust funds” to cover the eventual retirement of the massive Baby Boomer generation.
The alternative to trust-fund entitlements is “pay as you go,” which makes such programs nice and cheap in the beginning and vastly more expensive later on. This prospect used to be considered political poison, so trust funds became the conventional wisdom.
But those days are apparently over. The most recent Congressional Budget Office projections show the Highway Trust Fund running out in 2021 and the much bigger Medicare Trust Fund emptying in 2023. Social Security is projected to run out by 2030, but since those numbers were run before the pandemic slashed payments into the system, it’s safe to assume that Social Security’s trust fund evaporates circa 2027.
What happens when the various trust funds run out? The costs of these programs morph from “accounting issue” to “cash flow issue.” Taxes and/or deficits will rise dramatically as boomers move through their 70s and 80s, racking up massive medical bills along the way.
For a sense of just how big this change will be, here are a few fun facts:
In the early days of Social Security, 42 people were paying into the system for every 1 receiving benefits. Soon the ratio will be 2:1
The average early recipient received only a few years of payments before dying in their late 60s.
As life expectancies have risen, 20 years of benefits are now to be expected for most recipients, meaning that they’ll draw far more from Social Security and Medicare than they paid in.
There’s no demographic cavalry – in the form of younger workers — riding to the rescue. Birth rates are plunging in the developed world. Minus immigration, the US is now below replacement rate, meaning that the native born population is shrinking rather than growing. (This is great for the environment and housing affordability, but a serious problem for tax revenues.)
An optimist might note that all this new entitlement spending will at least be stimulative. But even that might not be true this time. The following chart, snagged from a recent Katusa Research article, shows that the velocity of money – the rate at which an existing dollar changes hands via spending – has been plunging lately (from an already historically-low level). So the past few years’ massive deficits and Federal Reserve currency printing have done nothing for spending.
The coming world of monetary inflation and sluggish growth has a name: stagflation. And based on America’s last experience with it in the 1970s, it’s a hard time to feed a family but a spectacular time to own gold and silver. This is what silver did back then.
We’re already in the early stages of a precious metals bull market. Here’s another Katusa chart showing how gold is crushing stocks so far in 2020.
So if we can’t stop the massive deficits and rampant currency creation, we might as well embrace the resulting stagflation and keep stacking.


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--The Rolling Stones Threaten to Sue Trump to Stop Playing Their Songs at Campaign Rallies

The Rolling Stones are threatening to sue President Trump over his continued playing of the iconic 1960s British Invasion group ’ s music at his campaign rallies .
The Stones made the threat in a follow-up to a demand by BMI , the performing rights organization , that the Trump campaign stop playing Stones songs .
The Stones ’ late Sixties classic You Can ’ t Get What You Want has been the closing anthem at Trump ’ s rallies and White House events for years .
Several other Rolling Stones songs are played over the campaign sound system during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Statement by the Stones issued Saturday , reported by Deadline : “ This could be the last time President Donald Trump uses Stones songs .
Despite cease & desist directives to Donald Trump in the past , the Rolling Stones are taking further steps to exclude him using their songs at any of his future political campaigning .
The Stones ’ legal team is working with BMI .
BMI has notified the Trump campaign on behalf of the Stones that the unauthorized use of their songs will constitute a breach of its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the exclusion and persists , then he would face a lawsuit for breaking the embargo and playing music that has not been licensed.
” Deadline reported the Stones ’ publishing company ABKCO was working with BMI and reported the contractual clause BMI is citing : “ BMI ’ s Music License for Political Entities or Organizations ( read it here ) states : “ One or more works or catalogs of works by one or more BMI songwriters may be excluded from this license if notice is received by BMI that such songwriters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ works for the intended uses by licensee .
BMI shall provide written notice to licensee of any such exclusion ” – which is whatBMI did this week.
” The Stone ’ s first objected to Trump ’ s use of their music in the 2016 campaign but did not force the issue until now .
The Stones ’ 2020 spring and summer tour of the United States and Canada was postponed due to the COVID-19 Chinese coronavirus pandemic .
The tour-ready band played a socially distanced acoustic version of You Can ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Citizen streamed concert on April 1 The Deadline article lists several others musicians who have complained about the Trump campaign playing their music , including most recently the estate of the late rocker Tom Petty .
This entry was posted on Sunday , June 28th , 2020 at 2:47 pm and is filed under Communists .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed .

By Kristinn Taylor
TheGatewayPundit.com
June 28, 2020
The Rolling Stones are threatening to sue President Trump over his continued playing of the iconic 1960s British Invasion group’s music at his campaign rallies. The Stones made the threat in a follow-up to a demand by BMI, the performing rights organization, that the Trump campaign stop playing Stones songs.
The Stones’ late Sixties classic You Can’t Get What You Want has been the closing anthem at Trump’s rallies and White House events for years. Several other Rolling Stones songs are played over the campaign sound system during the hours before Trump takes the stage.
Statement by the Stones issued Saturday, reported by Deadline:
“This could be the last time President Donald Trump uses Stones songs. Despite cease & desist directives to Donald Trump in the past, the Rolling Stones are taking further steps to exclude him using their songs at any of his future political campaigning. The Stones’ legal team is working with BMI. BMI has notified the Trump campaign on behalf of the Stones that the unauthorized use of their songs will constitute a breach of its licensing agreement. If Donald Trump disregards the exclusion and persists, then he would face a lawsuit for breaking the embargo and playing music that has not been licensed.”
Deadline reported the Stones’ publishing company ABKCO was working with BMI and reported the contractual clause BMI is citing:
“BMI’s Music License for Political Entities or Organizations (read it here) states: “One or more works or catalogs of works by one or more BMI songwriters may be excluded from this license if notice is received by BMI that such songwriters object to the use of their copyrighted works for the intended uses by licensee. BMI shall provide written notice to licensee of any such exclusion” – which is whatBMI did this week.”
The Stone’s first objected to Trump’s use of their music in the 2016 campaign but did not force the issue until now.
The Stones’ 2020 spring and summer tour of the United States and Canada was postponed due to the COVID-19 Chinese coronavirus pandemic. The tour-ready band played a socially distanced acoustic version of You Can’t Get What You Want for the Global Citizen streamed concert on April 1
The Deadline article lists several others musicians who have complained about the Trump campaign playing their music, including most recently the estate of the late rocker Tom Petty.


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--Demon Pelosi Tries to Revive Dead Russia Hoax — Says Russians Must Have Something on Trump

Demon Pelosi tried desperately on Sunday to revive the Russia hoax .
After three years of investigations and spying on candidate trump , his campaign , his family , his transition team and his administration , the criminal Obama deep state were not able to find any links between Russia and Donald Trump .
Democrats smeared him in their attempted coup but found NOTHING .
But that didn ’ t stop Demon Pelosi from pushing the collusion hoax again on Sunday morning .
According to deep state leakers Russia was paying the Taliban to kill US soldiers in Afghanistan .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Pelosi today told ABC ’ s “ This Week ” with George Stephanopoulos that Russia must have something on President Trump .
Speaker Pelosi : “ This is as bad as it gets , and yet the president will not confront the Russians on this score , denies being briefed .
I don ’ t know what the Russians have on the president , politically , personally , financially , or whatever it is , but he wants to ignore , he wants to bring them back to the G-8 despite the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Is there a woman in America more toxic and dishonest as Nancy Pelosi ?
This entry was posted on Sunday , June 28th , 2020 at 2:40 pm and is filed under Communists , Government Evil .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed .

By Jim Hoft
TheGatewayPundit.com
June 28, 2020
Demon Pelosi tried desperately on Sunday to revive the Russia hoax.
After three years of investigations and spying on candidate trump, his campaign, his family, his transition team and his administration, the criminal Obama deep state were not able to find any links between Russia and Donald Trump. Democrats smeared him in their attempted coup but found NOTHING.
But that didn’t stop Demon Pelosi from pushing the collusion hoax again on Sunday morning.
According to deep state leakers Russia was paying the Taliban to kill US soldiers in Afghanistan.
Trump wants US troops out of Afghanistan.
Pelosi today told ABC’s “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos that Russia must have something on President Trump.
Speaker Pelosi: “This is as bad as it gets, and yet the president will not confront the Russians on this score, denies being briefed. I don’t know what the Russians have on the president, politically, personally, financially, or whatever it is, but he wants to ignore, he wants to bring them back to the G-8 despite the annexation of Crimea and invasion of Ukraine.”
This woman is shameless.
Pelosi: "This is as bad as it gets and yet the president will not confront the Russians on this score, denies being briefed. Whether he is or not, his admin knows … With him all roads lead to Putin. I don't know what the Russians have on the president." pic.twitter.com/S4ui1FtI82 — Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) June 28, 2020
Is there a woman in America more toxic and dishonest as Nancy Pelosi?


revolutionradio--2020-06-28--We need a new CIVIL RIGHTS law to protect the modern-day oppressed: Conservatives, Christians and Wh

We need a new CIVIL RIGHTS law to protect the modern-day oppressed: Conservatives, Christians and Whites…(And A New Country!)

It ’ s illegal in America to discriminate against women because they ’ re women .
It ’ s also illegal to discriminate against Blacks because of the color of their skin .
And the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that it ’ s even illegal to discriminate against people who invent a whole new “ gender identity ” and claim to be a fictitious gender that ’ s invented out of thin air .
But in America today , it is perfectly legal to discriminate against conservatives , Christians and Whites , merely based on their political beliefs or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s because the 1964 Civil Rights Act — which was spearheaded by Republicans and opposed by Democrats , by the way — sought only to protect segments of society that were being oppressed at the time .
The act , however , did not protect people who might be oppressed in the future .
Fast forward to 2020 , and the oppressed people in America are conservatives , Christians and Whites .
They have no special protections and are routinely discriminated against by Facebook , YouTube and Twitter , where merely citing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Whites are routinely penalized in the workplace where racial quotas favor “ people of color , ” thereby punishing Whites who might be more qualified for the job .
Microsoft , for example , recently announced the company would hire more Black people even if they weren ’ t the best qualified for the job .
And in U.S. universities , both Whites and Asians are heavily punished merely because of their ethnicity , where Blacks are given extra admission credit solely because of “ Black privilege.
” If you are White in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guilt and sin ; you are denied career advancement because of the color of your skin , and you are singled out for violent attacks on the streets as Black Lives Matter mobs seek out victims based entirely on their apparent race .
It ’ s time for a new civil rights act that expands the protections of the 1964 Act to include people of any skin color , any religion or any race… not just women , Blacks and transgenders .
To achieve true equal protection under the law , discrimination must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supposed to be based on the idea of achieving “ equality ” in society , where all people are treated equally .
But how can equality be achieved when corporations , government , universities and half the population deliberately discriminate against people because of their political views , religious views or lack of melanin in their skin ?
According to the radical Left today , White people are evil , horrible people because they are born white .
Can you imagine the outcry if a similar criticism were directed at Black people merely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transgenders and homosexuals are afforded all sorts of special protections and societal status , heterosexuals are demonized by the progressive Left , too .
Men are actually looked down upon for not being gay , and people who espouse “ family values ” are flagged for “ hate.
” Time and time again , male-female marriage has been condemned by Leftists , and the attacks on the traditional family are a never-ending saga in American culture today .
Because of this extreme discrimination against conservatives , Christians , Whites and heterosexuals , only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — i.e .
Blacks , homosexuals , transgenders , etc .
— are even allowed the right to speak .
The First Amendment is only respected , in other words , if you are someone who expresses hatred toward Whites , conservatives or Christians .
This was demonstrated just recently in the Project Veritas explosive investigation into Facebook , where it was discovered that Facebook ’ s own content censors are radical left-wing fanatics who flag all conservatives and Christians as being engaged in “ hate ” while simultaneously allowing actual hate-filled content @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of individuals ( transgenders , etc . )
as long as their hatred was directed at conservatives , Christians or Whites .
When the tech giants claim to be “ anti-hate , ” it ’ s an absurd , dishonest claim .
In fact , they are pro-hate as long as the hate is directed at conservatives , Christians or Whites .
Honest criticism against Blacks , women or LGBTQWERTY fanatics is , of course , immediately flagged as “ hate , ” but malicious hatred directed at conservatives is considered “ legitimate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the haters on the Left have now defined their hatred and bigotry as “ equality , ” while those with conservative or Christian views are flagged as “ haters ” even if their arguments are rooted in reason and legitimate arguments .
We now live in a society where it ’ s accepted to openly discriminate against certain groups of people based on their beliefs or skin color As a result of all this , we now live in a society where discriminating against people based on their skin color or beliefs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and corporations ) .
Even Whites themselves have been brainwashed into embracing “ white guilt , ” which is a form of psychological torment that targets people of a specific skin color .
Who will now stand up for the rights of the oppressed ?
Christians are being persecuted , both online and offline , all around the world .
White people are being systematically punished in the workplace , shushed in public debates and physically attacked and demanded to pay reparations merely because of the color of skin they were born @ @ @ @ @ @ @ de-monetized and blacklisted by the tech giants merely because they love their country and its Founding Fathers .
To speak warmly of the American flag or the President of the United States is now deemed “ hate speech ” by the intolerant Left .
Democrats are hate-filled bigots who tolerate nothing but obedience This situation is untenable .
My warning to Leftists is that you can not have peace in society by pushing discrimination against the people you despise .
You call for “ equality ” but actually demand the destruction of those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ inclusiveness ” but you silence and destroy those who espouse views that you don ’ t like .
You once claimed to desire to “ coexist , ” but now all you can spout is calls for “ killing cops ” and murdering Whites .
Democrats are not tolerant people ; they are intolerant bigots .
They are filled with loathing and hatred , and they will use every position of power they acquire to punish , silence and destroy Christians , conservatives and Whites .
The next time you vote , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a ( D ) next to their name , you are voting for D = “ Discrimination ” = “ Demonic ” = “ De-platformed ” = “ Destruction.
” True tolerance now comes solely from the Right .
Conservatives are the new civil rights pioneers in America , and if Martin Luther King were alive today , he would be marching against the lunacy and intolerance of the radical Left that espouses discrimination , bigotry and hatred at every opportunity .
Urge your representatives in Washington to call for new civil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all groups in America , which is the only way we then have a level playing field where people compete based on merit rather than madness .
Stop the Black Lives Bullies from bullying society any longer .
It ’ s time to end their bigotry and hatred .
This entry was posted on Sunday , June 28th , 2020 at 2:34 pm and is filed under Civil War II .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed .

by: Mike Adams
NaturalNews.com
Sunday, June 28, 2020
It’s illegal in America to discriminate against women because they’re women. It’s also illegal to discriminate against Blacks because of the color of their skin. And the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that it’s even illegal to discriminate against people who invent a whole new “gender identity” and claim to be a fictitious gender that’s invented out of thin air.
But in America today, it is perfectly legal to discriminate against conservatives, Christians and Whites, merely based on their political beliefs or the whiteness of their skin. That’s because the 1964 Civil Rights Act — which was spearheaded by Republicans and opposed by Democrats, by the way — sought only to protect segments of society that were being oppressed at the time. The act, however, did not protect people who might be oppressed in the future.
Today’s oppressed groups are conservatives, Christians and Whites
Fast forward to 2020, and the oppressed people in America are conservatives, Christians and Whites. They have no special protections and are routinely discriminated against by Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, where merely citing scripture is now considered “hate.” Whites are routinely penalized in the workplace where racial quotas favor “people of color,” thereby punishing Whites who might be more qualified for the job. Microsoft, for example, recently announced the company would hire more Black people even if they weren’t the best qualified for the job. And in U.S. universities, both Whites and Asians are heavily punished merely because of their ethnicity, where Blacks are given extra admission credit solely because of “Black privilege.”
If you are White in modern society, you are assigned automatic guilt and sin; you are denied career advancement because of the color of your skin, and you are singled out for violent attacks on the streets as Black Lives Matter mobs seek out victims based entirely on their apparent race.
It’s time for a new civil rights act that expands the protections of the 1964 Act to include people of any skin color, any religion or any race… not just women, Blacks and transgenders.
To achieve true equal protection under the law, discrimination must be outlawed against ALL groups
Progressivism is supposed to be based on the idea of achieving “equality” in society, where all people are treated equally. But how can equality be achieved when corporations, government, universities and half the population deliberately discriminate against people because of their political views, religious views or lack of melanin in their skin? According to the radical Left today, White people are evil, horrible people because they are born white. Can you imagine the outcry if a similar criticism were directed at Black people merely because they were born Black?
While transgenders and homosexuals are afforded all sorts of special protections and societal status, heterosexuals are demonized by the progressive Left, too. Men are actually looked down upon for not being gay, and people who espouse “family values” are flagged for “hate.” Time and time again, male-female marriage has been condemned by Leftists, and the attacks on the traditional family are a never-ending saga in American culture today.
Because of this extreme discrimination against conservatives, Christians, Whites and heterosexuals, only people who stand opposite to these traits — i.e. Blacks, homosexuals, transgenders, etc. — are even allowed the right to speak. The First Amendment is only respected, in other words, if you are someone who expresses hatred toward Whites, conservatives or Christians. This was demonstrated just recently in the Project Veritas explosive investigation into Facebook, where it was discovered that Facebook’s own content censors are radical left-wing fanatics who flag all conservatives and Christians as being engaged in “hate” while simultaneously allowing actual hate-filled content to be posted by left-wing protected types of individuals (transgenders, etc.) as long as their hatred was directed at conservatives, Christians or Whites.
When the tech giants claim to be “anti-hate,” it’s an absurd, dishonest claim. In fact, they are pro-hate as long as the hate is directed at conservatives, Christians or Whites. Honest criticism against Blacks, women or LGBTQWERTY fanatics is, of course, immediately flagged as “hate,” but malicious hatred directed at conservatives is considered “legitimate” criticism and not hate.
Thus, the haters on the Left have now defined their hatred and bigotry as “equality,” while those with conservative or Christian views are flagged as “haters” even if their arguments are rooted in reason and legitimate arguments.
We now live in a society where it’s accepted to openly discriminate against certain groups of people based on their beliefs or skin color
As a result of all this, we now live in a society where discriminating against people based on their skin color or beliefs is perfectly acceptable (to “progressives” and corporations). Even Whites themselves have been brainwashed into embracing “white guilt,” which is a form of psychological torment that targets people of a specific skin color.
Who will now stand up for the rights of the oppressed?
Christians are being persecuted, both online and offline, all around the world.
White people are being systematically punished in the workplace, shushed in public debates and physically attacked and demanded to pay reparations merely because of the color of skin they were born with.
Conservatives are routinely de-platformed, de-monetized and blacklisted by the tech giants merely because they love their country and its Founding Fathers. To speak warmly of the American flag or the President of the United States is now deemed “hate speech” by the intolerant Left.
Democrats are hate-filled bigots who tolerate nothing but obedience
This situation is untenable. My warning to Leftists is that you cannot have peace in society by pushing discrimination against the people you despise. You call for “equality” but actually demand the destruction of those you oppose. You claim you want “inclusiveness” but you silence and destroy those who espouse views that you don’t like. You once claimed to desire to “coexist,” but now all you can spout is calls for “killing cops” and murdering Whites.
Democrats are not tolerant people; they are intolerant bigots. They are filled with loathing and hatred, and they will use every position of power they acquire to punish, silence and destroy Christians, conservatives and Whites.
The next time you vote, remember that if you vote for anyone with a (D) next to their name, you are voting for D = “Discrimination” = “Demonic” = “De-platformed” = “Destruction.”
True tolerance now comes solely from the Right. Conservatives are the new civil rights pioneers in America, and if Martin Luther King were alive today, he would be marching against the lunacy and intolerance of the radical Left that espouses discrimination, bigotry and hatred at every opportunity.
Urge your representatives in Washington to call for new civil rights legislation to protect all people and all groups in America, which is the only way we then have a level playing field where people compete based on merit rather than madness.
Stop the Black Lives Bullies from bullying society any longer. It’s time to end their bigotry and hatred.